Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-12-16 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT December 10, 1998 phone: 1714)962-2411 mailing address: NOTICE OF MEETING BD Box 8127 Founteln valley.CA 92728-6127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS .44Ells Avenue ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 19844 Ellis Avenue Pount92 Valley.CA 92798-TB,B WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1998 - 6:30 P.M. DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Member 10844 Ellis Avenue Agenda. Fountain Valley, California 92708 Oil The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Anaheim Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. Bra. Buena Park Cypress Fountain lrell.y Fully,= B.rden 3,ove HunGngt.n Beach wine Le HabraL. Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Bo# d Secretary Orange Placentia Sent.Ane Seel Beach Stant.n Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Tustin Villa Park Yorbe Linde County .f orange STEERING COMMITTEEIAD HOC sanitary Dl.tri.ts COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, December 16, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. Coat. Move Midway c¢y AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC Water Districts PLAN - Wednesday, January 6, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. Irvin. Ranch STRATEGIC PLAN WORKSHOP - Saturday, January 9, 1999 at 9:00 a.m. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, January 27, 1999 at 5:00 P.M. "To Protect the Public Health and the Environment thr.ugh Excellence in Wastewater 5ys[ems' BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting January January 27, 1999 February February 24, 1999 March March 24, 1999 April April 28, 1999 May May 26, 1999 June June 23, 1999 July July 28, 1999 August August 25, 1999 September September 22, 1999 October October 27, 1999 November November 17, 1999 December December 15, 1999 January January 26, 2000 AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 108"ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 16, 1998-6:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of Callfomia Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrafive Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on speck agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 12/16/98 F Page 2 of 6 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on September 23, 1998 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: 11/15/98 i 11130/91 Totals $4,856,684.44 $3.375,553.03 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 12/16/98 Page 3 of 6 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re December 16, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 18, 1998 to be filed. 10. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re December 2, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 4, 1998 to be filed. C. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation for Program Design, Field Sampling and Laboratory Analyses for Year One Strategic Process Studies (SPS), Specification No. P-185, for a total amount not to exceed $1,881,528.00. 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re December 3, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 3, 1998 to be filed. C. Ratify Change Order No. 16 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. 131.36-2, with Margate Construction authorizing an addition of$130,396 and 60 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$35,629,753. d. Accept Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P140.2 (Rebid), and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No, P247-2 (Rebid), as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving final closeout agreement with Margate Construction, Inc. e. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. for value engineering services for Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, for an amount not to exceed $81.580. I. Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro, Inc. for Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-1, and Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 2, Job No. P247-1, providing for additional design and construction support services for an additional amount of$280,234, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,772,478. 1 v16/98 Page 4 of 6 11. g. (1) Establish a budget of$90,000 for Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4; and (2)Approve Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants to perform engineering services and prepare a project report for the Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-17, Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, and Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-2 1, for an amount not to exceed $190,545. h. Approve a budget amendment of$345,300 for a total project budget of$1,735,900 for Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Fountain Valley Channel to Orangethorpe Avenue; Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue; and Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Marian Sewer to Carbon Creek Channel, Contract No. 2-34R; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Award a contract to Sancon Engineering II, Inc. for Contract No. 2-34R for an amount not to exceed $1,310,900. 1. (1)Approve plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R; and (2)Approve a budget amendment for Contract No. 3-35R from $3,500,000 to$6,500,000. j. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates for preparation of Phase 3 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-4, to provide additional environmental services in the amount of$90,457 for a total amount not to exceed $352,571. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re December 9, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 9, 1998 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 1998. d. Renew the District's Excess General Liability Insurance Program for the three-year period July 1, 1999 to July 1, 2002, in an amount not to exceed $111,492 each fiscal year e. Receive and file the 1998-99 Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter ended September 30, 1998 f. Receive and file the Districts' Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)for the year ended June 30, 1998, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants 12/16/98 Page 5 of 6 12. g. Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1 through September 30, 1998. 13. (1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (2)Award a contract to KPRS Construction Services, Inc. for Warehouse at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-65, for an amount not to exceed$1,075,000. 14. Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Cooperative Agreement with Orange County Water District authorizing the following: (1)A method for charging staff time to the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System; and (2)A reimbursement procedure for allocating grant monies obtained for the GWR System. 15. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(C). 2. Confer with General Counsel re Clarence Haydock v. Orange County Sanitation District, Worker's Compensation Appeals Board Case No. AHM 0063107 (Government Code Section 54956.9) b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in dosed session 16. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 17. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 12/16/98 Page 6 of 6 18. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 19. Adjournments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 H:%w .Eta�agenda%1998 Joint Board AgendW121696.Ex December 18, 1998 Dear Board Member: There are numerous opportunities for you to contribute to the continued success of the Sanitation District in addition to your membership on one of the three standing committees, Planning, Design and Construction (PDC); Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services (OMTS); and Finance, Human Resources and Administration (FAHR). For example, Board members represent the District on other governing boards and county agencies, including the Orange County Council of Governments and the LAFCO Special Advisory Committee. This survey will help identify those Board members who are interested in taking a leadership role. More importantly, the results of this survey will help ensure all future leadership needs of the District are met. And, we will be better able to identify your areas of interest. Thank you for taking the time to complete the following. 1. 1 am interested in changing committees from to 2. 1 am interested in becoming the chair or vice chair of the following standing committee: 3. 1 would be interested in being the Sanitation District Board delegate to: LAFCO Special Advisory Committee' Yes No In the future (position is currently vacant) Council of Governments Yes No In the future (position is currently filled) National Water Research Institute Yes No In the future (position is currently rifled) Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency Yes No In the future (position is currently(lied) GWR Joint Cooperative Committee Yes No In the future (position is currently filled) I 'The LAFCO Special Advisory Committee meets the third Thursday of the month in the OCSD Board Room to discuss special issues coming before LAFCO. Name SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING December 16, 1998—6:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. a. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Anaheim Shirley McCracken Tom Daly' Brea Lynn Daucher Roy Moore La Habra Steve Anderson Steve Simonian Santa Ana Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz Stanton Brian Donahue Harry Dotson' Villa Park Russell Patterson Richard A. Freschi Costa Mesa San. Dist. James Ferryman Art Perry Midway City San. Dist. Joy L. Neugebauer James V. Evans b. Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any W:wodlaWgenda\Board AgendaM1998 Board Agendask121698suppagenda.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District, to behold on ! /(p 19?Zwas duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on -2 116 1922 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this L day of 19yr Penny M. Kyl Secretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District HAW P.DTAIADMIN\SSV0RMS1F27A A4890 Combated water District BOAROOFOIRECFORB R.MICNAEL NEAE December 14, 1998 P,eeKBM DAWwV FRE.SOCgMU.EA F.,Vb Pm l °n"'""I President Jan Debay&Board Members BANA"u S County Sanitation Districts of Orange County romFiN,11 P.O.Box 8127 musroxuwuu Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Vm PmeNMI pwwn m NENm,sP.xux Dear President Debay: v aPeegmi In response to the vacant seat at the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), Mesa Consolidated Water District's (Mesa) Board of Directors COLEEN sCARMNACN took action at the December 10 'Board meeting to nominate Mesa Director Trudy Ohlig- swm•h Hall to the Orange County LAFCO Special Districts alternate commissioner seat. MARGAREI M.W.ROOE°OE "u°"°' Director Ohlig-Hall is currently a member of the LAFCO Special District Technical SOME.ARNESON Advisory Committee. She is also Mesa's representative to LAFCO and the Independent M.WREE B(PANNONE MW y Special Districts of Orange County (ISDOC). Director Ohlig-Hall serves on Men's Cities/District Liaison, Engineering & Operations, Finance, and Human Resources committees. She also has a broad and comprehensive understanding of Orange County governance issues. As a member of the American Water Works Association (AW WA) and the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) Water Quality Committees, Director Ohlig-Hall has lead the way and dedicated substantial efforts to resolving the MTBE hazard issue. Mem Cmvalidaled %I,,Dwr ,,}mwion We encourage your Board to concur with Mesa,endorse and select Director Trudy Ohlig- i:m ar..r aarCaFlamr.F Hall at the January 141°quarterly meeting of ISDOC. dvaagh e$Cienr managemeu and da.bnirm nfA ffCirne SlnCereI 'apply r,fquality water arafaircwt.. / red Bockmiller President,Board of Directors e: Mesa Bond Or Dirttors Kad Kemp,General MaOAgn Diane Leach,Assistant General Manager P.O. Box 5008. 1965 Placentia Avenue a Costa Mesa,California 92628.5008 Telephone(714)631.1200 FAX(714) 574-1036 ' ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 12116/98 TIME: 6:30 P.M. (SIMONIAN).......... ANDERSON .................... ✓ ✓ (FLORY) ............... BANKHEAD ..................... —_ (BOYD) ................ I2ROWOI .........................� _rG (COOK) ................ COLLINS ........................� — (MOORE).............. DAUCHER ........................Az — (NOYES)............... DEBAY.............................. / — (DOTSON) ........... DONAHUE...................... (UNDERHILL)......... ECKENRODE...................� (PERRY) ............... FERRYMAN .................... ..z (WISNER) ............. GULLIXSON.................... — (BROADWATER).... LEYES............................JL �I. (MAULLER) ........... MARSHALL .................... ✓ �/ _ (DALY)................. MC CRACKEN................. ✓ -v _ (LUTZ) ................. MC GUIGAN ................... ✓ _ (WALKER) ............ MINER-BRADFORD .......... ✓ ✓ (COONTZ) ............ MURPHY........................ (EVANS)............... NEUGEBAUER................. ✓ ✓ (FRESCHI) ............ PATTERSON................... — (KEENAN)............. PIERCY .......................... (POTTS) ............... SALTARELLI ................... � — (HAMMOND)......... SHEA............................. ✓ — (SPITZER)............. STEINER......................... ,/ / _ (HARMAN) ........... SULLIVAN......................J� (MILLER) .............. SWAN ........................... ✓ �/ — (BATES) ............... SYLVIA........................... STAFF: Anderson Ghirelli ✓ Hodges ✓ � /(� Kyle Ludwin McIntyre ✓ Miles ✓ Ooten Peterman Streed Tuchman ✓ OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus 12/17/98 lNmdmWftl wp.,h%ad.MM%DIRECTORWktrM m Roo Cell.dx SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) -74 C S'h tl b CHAIRMAN'S REPORT BOARD MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 1998 1 . CASA (THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF SANITATION AGENCIES) IS HOLDING ITS WINTER CONFERENCE IN RANCHO MIRAGE BEGINNING THURSDAY, JANUARY 21ST AND ENDING SATURDAY NOON, JANUARY 2311D. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ATTENDING, PLEASE CONTACT JEAN TAPPAN, DON MC INTYRE'S ASSISTANT, AT 714 593-7101 , NO LATER THAN TOMORROW. 2. THERE WILL BE AN AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6T", BEGINNING AT 5:30 P.M. THE NEXT STRATEGIC PLAN DIRECTORS WORKSHOP WILL BE HELD ON SATURDAY, JANUARY 9T" BETWEEN 9 A.M. AND 12 NOON, TO DISCUSS THE RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. I WANT TO URGE ALL OF YOU TO ATTEND, ESPECIALLY THE NEW DIRECTORS. i 3. AS YOU MAY HAVE NOTICED, THERE ARE NO WORKING COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY. THE NORMAL SCHEDULE WILL RESUME IN FEBRUARY. 4. 1 HAVE APPOINTED JOHN COLLINS TO SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT/ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT JOINT COORDINATING COMMITTEE FOR THE GWR PROJECT. HE WILL ALSO SERVE AS THE CHAIR OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN. 5. ENCLOSED IN YOUR FOLDERS IS A LEADERSHIP SURVEY, WHICH IS PRINTED ON GREEN PAPER. PLEASE TAKE A MINUTE TO FILL IT OUT, AND DON'T FORGET TO INCLUDE YOUR NAME AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM. LEAVE IT IN YOUR FOLDER AT THE END OF THE MEETING. 6. RESOLUTIONS FOR MARGIE RICE AND BILL STEINER. z ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT penny Kyte (2 copies no label) Board Secretary December 10, 1998 Planes: I7141952-2411 To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors eesumg add..: Pa B.8127 roun Sub ect: Board Lefter 9v veney.CA 12e-s1zT anwt address: 10844 Ell's Avenue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional rvuncein valley ca information on any of the items, please call me. 92708-T018 District Receives '98 Underground Storage Tanks [UST) Certifications Minister December 22, 1998 is the deadline for owners/operators of underground storage Aden°"' tanks (UST) to comply with EPA-mandated requirements regarding construction, spill e prevention, and monitoring. Eighteen of the District's UST are in full compliance with Me. the federal requirements and have been signed off by the Orange County Health Care Anaha. Agency (OCHCA), the local permitting agency responsible for performing the area certification inspections required by the EPA. Buena Perk Lypress Fauneam Vevey A nineteenth lank was recently installed at the Main Street Pump Station. Since this Pallrttan tank is not yet in operation it is exempt from the deadline. When the tank is brought Garnish Situ. into service it will already be compliant with the December 22 deadline. The District Huntington arson uses its UST to store unleaded and diesel motor vehicle fuels, tube oil, and waste Beach La Habra oils. Le Palma Los Ahirr ass hlawPort Beach New Appointments to Board Working Committees Orange vn . Bal. Chair Deba has announced the ointment of Director Norm Eckenrode as Chair of e An Ana Y e appointment Seat Beach the PDC Committee and a member of the Steering Committee, effective immediately. Sanwil Also, Director Collins has been appointed Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Tustin Villa Park Plan. Ybrbe Linda County or orange We have also been advised that Joy Neugebauer is replacing Margie Rice as the Midway City Sanitation District representative on the Board, effective immediately. Sanitary Districts CASA Serves Notice of Intent to Sue on U.S. EPA re "TMDL's" Costa Mesa Md.,crr The Board of Directors of the California Association of Sanitation Agencies ("CASA"), Water Districts of which the District is an active member, along with the Southern California Alliance Irnne Peach of Publicly-Owned Treatment Works ("SCAP"), of which the District is also a member, have each recently approved and served a formal notice, pursuant to the provisions of Section 505(b) of the Clean Water Act, on the United States Environmental Protection Agency for its failure to properly administer its duties under Sections 303 and 305(b) of the Clean Water Act. This was a difficult decision for both of the Boards, but ultimately it was determined that the long-term interests of virtually all POTWs was somewhat at risk, and that a 70 PmMcr Des Pudic Her Rh rM Owr EnwvxrwR Wnuph EsMmce in Wesuwerer Stamens' Board of Directors Page 2 December 10, 1998 judicial determination of certain issues was necessary in order to avoid the promulgation of regulations and the taking of other administrative actions which could ultimately cost each POTW millions of dollars. CASA and SCAP believe that EPA's failure to properly comply with the statutory requirements of the Clean Water Act compromises the missions of these two organizations, by setting in motion a regulatory program that may potentially force CASA and SCAP members to install costly treatment processes that will not result in any substantial water quality benefit. At issue is the subject known as TMDL's, which are Total Maximum Daily Loads of pollutants that have been identified, listed, and priority ranked within all navigable bodies of water within each state. This issue is a national problem, and has been a scientific struggle for many years. No state has been able to fully comply, and virtually no state has even significantly complied with its requirements to prepare and submit to EPA a report describing the water quality of all navigable waters in the state, together with an analysis of how the water protects and propagates a balance population of marine life, and the extent to which eliminating pollutants will be achieved. States are required to assess environmental impact, together with economic and social costs, and economic and social benefits. States are also required to identify the navigable waters where effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and once they have been identified, the states are required to establish the TMDL. The burden then is upon EPA to monitor and enforce this program, and it is its failure to do so that is the essence of this litigation. There is considerable opinion and school of thought that the real party is the nonpoint sources of pollution—namely, surface water runoff, but that in responding to those demands, rules and regulations will be imposed upon the POTWs as well. By EPA failing to require the State of California to perform its statutory duties and yet approving the California list, has led the POTWs to believe that it is a violation of law and warrants intervention by the Courts to have the program operated as adopted by Congress. Regional Water Quality Control Board Plant Inspection Steve Mayville, an inspector from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, conducted a comprehensive inspection of Plants 1 and 2 over the course of three days in early November. The inspection included staff interviews regarding construction dewatering practices, training and certifications, asset management software, and recycle flows. Operations and Maintenance presented an overview of Board of Directors Page 3 December 10, 1998 its current programs and Environmental Sciences Laboratory staff split influent and effluent samples with the inspector. No violations were noted during the inspection and the inspector's comments were positive. Attached is a November 24, 1998 memorandum report from staff on the inspection. Seal Beach Converting to Natural Gas The City of Seal Beach will replace six of its gasoline-powered vehicles, including police cars, with ones running on natural gas and will build a refueling station to be used by several public agencies. Their City Council unanimously authorized city officials to sign a contract with Pickens Fuel Corporation (of Seal Beach) to build the CNG station, which will be owned and operated by Pickens on city land. Seal Beach is using a $250,000 state energy grant to help fund the project. Ford Offering Vehicle Incentives on 1999 AFV Products The Ford Motor Company recently announced that for 1999 they would continue to offer substantial incentives to help customers make alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) economically viable additions to their fleets. A $2,000 incentive is available on the dedicated F-Series NGVs and Econoline dedicated and bi-fuel NGVs, as well as a $1,500 incentive on the Crown Victoria (or a $2025 incentive for the CV Extended- Range package). Ford AFV incentives are available in addition to any other Ford fleet incentives for which an AFV may qualify. Staff is analyzing our current motor pool and will be revising the policy governing the purchase of vehicles to include a preference for purchasing alternative fuel vehicles. Wheeler Ridge Compost Site Update Since the November 18 Board meeting, District's staff and consultants have been actively performing the preliminary steps tasks of the due diligence research on "Wheeler Ridge," the 640-acre site that may be used as a biosolids composting facility and composting of other related feedstock. During the due-diligence process we will determine if the information used in the preparation of the preliminary pro forma for the facility is supported. The preliminary pro forma analysis shows that if the facility were operating at or near capacity, it is highly likely the operation would substantially reduce OCSD's overall costs of biosolids management away from the treatment plant while producing a Class A biosolids product. District staff is in the process of retaining consultants to assist in performing several of the due-diligence tasks. Staff and existing consultants have begun performing a title search and an appraisal on Wheeler Ridge. Within the next month we hope to have completed the appropriate environmental research and review, preliminary permitting determination, site survey, water rights determination, and privatization Board of Directors Page 4 December 10, 1998 analyses. By the end of February 1999, we expect to have completed the preliminary site engineering, market research on feedstock (green waste, food waste, manure, food processing waste and agricultural residues) and compost products revenue, facility financial analysis, and alternative site analysis. By the end of March 1999, preliminary California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis, public acceptance efforts, the possibility of leasing portions of the land and infrastructure to entities such as the Forest Service, law enforcement agencies, and small industrial facilities, and legal review should also be completed. By the and of the due-diligence process, we will have determined if Wheeler Ridge is suitable for windrow composting, having the capacity to take in and process about 1,200,000 tons per year of organic matter. Please note that the total annual OCSD production of biosolids is less than 200,000 tons per year and can be fully accommodated by the operation of the Wheeler Ridge site. Plant No. 2 Surge Tower Construction This past summer, the new surge tower that was under construction at Plant No 2 developed cracks and associated leaking in its concrete base during hydraulic testing. An engineering analysis determined that the structure was not adequately designed. A fix was designed and has recently been completed successfully by the contractor at a cost of$299,900. Since the fix was necessary due to the error in the design, the cost will be reimbursed by the designer, Carollo Engineers. Plant No. 2 Storm Water Detention Basins During last winter's El Nino storms, Plant No. 2 experienced periods when storm water runoff from the plant site went onto Brookhurst Street. Although only storm water carrying sediment and no sewage was discharged, it created a public relations problem. Additionally, a storm water management plan is required by our new NPDES Permit that will establish best management practices for the District to retain and treat storm water runoff on-site. To accomplish this, grading will be done on the north end of the plant site and storm water detention basins will be constructed to prevent storm water runoff from leaving the site. The basins will also allow Operations to more effectively manage the peak flows needing treatment that are associated with in-plant storm runoff, As directed by the PDC Committee in November, the work will be constructed as a change order to an existing contract in an effort to expedite the work and complete the construction before the anticipated rains this winter. A project has been designed and bids were solicited from contractors that are currently working for the District. The low bid of$86,968 was received from Advanco Constructors. The work started on December 7 and is anticipated to be completed in 2 to 3 weeks. Board of Directors Page 5 December 10, 1998 Strategic Plan Workshop The next Strategic Plan Workshop for all Directors will be held on Saturday, January 9 from 9 a.m. to Noon at the District's Administrative Office. A summary of the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) will be presented to you showing the proposed annual expenditures for the treatment plants, collection system, Groundwater Replenishment System, and cooperative projects. Board members will review the proposed CIP and its impact on District's rates. Please RSVP by Thursday. January 7, to Debra Lacuna, at (714) 593-7121. Complaint Received re Revised Property Tax Bills At last month's Board meeting, Gary Streed briefed you on a complaint received from George Phelps regarding duplicate property lax billings required because of a programming error that billed sewer service fees to both the mobile home owners and the mobile home park owner. Mr. Phelps also requested an accounting of the costs to correct this error. The County has provided the following information to us: Programming consultant, $6,256: forms, postage and data processing, $2,436; and County Auditor's Office processing, $431, for a total of$9,123. We sent Mr. Phelps this information. Staff regrets this error which was a result of a quirk in the data base and a change in the property selection criteria in our user fee program. The change to a different, more descriptive data field overrode previous programming instructions. Orange County Bankruptcy Update Attached are press releases from Patrick Shea, OCIP attorney, announcing additional settlements, as follows: SBC Capital Markets, Inc. $ 6,500,000 Paribas Corp. 1,420,000 Fuji Securities 7.900,000 Dain Rauscher Corp. 10.000,000 These settlements, which are subject to approval by the Court, bring total litigation recoveries to approximately$798,991,732. Silverado Constructors Dewaterino Discharge— Eastern Transportation Corridor Project Silverado Constructors plan to discharge up to 1.3 mgd of treated groundwater to Peters Canyon Wash. Silverado needs to dewater the area around the Eastern Transportation Corridor project where the corridor passes under the 5 Freeway. The togs Board of Directors Page 6 December 10, 1998 District has an agreement with Silverado to allow pumping the water through the District's Main Street Pump Station, treating it through our system and discharging it through our outfall. We accepted the water after the RWOCB denied IRWD a permit to discharge the high-nitrate ground water to the Wash (which flows to Newport Bay). In order to meet the RWOCB's limits for the routine discharge, Silverado recently completed a $2 million nitrate removal system with plans to start treating and discharging to the Wash by the end of the year. Defend the Bay and Newport resident Allan Beek have filed a petition in OC Superior Court to prevent the discharge by IRWD. This issue was the subject of a LA Times article (copy attached). Staff will follow this situation and report back to you as things develop. Open House Marks Completion of Training Facility for Confined Space Rescue An Open House will be held on Thursday, Dec. 17, at the Costa Mesa Fire Station on Placentia to mark the completion of a joint training facility for confined space rescue. District staff has been working with the CMFD and the Central Net Operating Authority for the past two years to establish the training facility, which will allow us to more effectively coordinate confined space rescues with neighboring firing departments. The facility will also be available for future OSHA training needs. Orange County Grand Jury Attached is a letter of thanks from the Orange County Grand Jury's Environment and Transportation Committee. We will continue to meet with them and provide any information they need when requested to do so, as shown below. Presentation to Orange County Grand Jury On December 7, Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, spoke to the Environment and Transportation Committee of the Orange County Grand Jury about the issue of beach closures, water quality, and storm water runoff. Bob's presentation traced the history of the development of statewide public health standards and beach closure protocols, recently enacted by AS 411, which went into effect earlier this year. Of the more than 300 beach closures and warnings issued by the Orange County Health Care Agency in 1997, none were attributable to the District's discharge; most were related to storm events. The Foreman of the 1998-99 Grand Jury is Sheldon Singer, a former member of the District's Board of Directors. Congress: 105'h Session Recap and 1061h Session Forecast The District's Washington, D.C., legislative and regulatory consultant, ENS Resources, has provided us with a summary of their observations on the 1051h and 106'h Congresses. If you are interested in obtaining copies of these documents, please call Jean Tappan at 714/593-7101. h. Board of Directors Page 7 December 10, 1998 Odor Complaints Two odor complaints were received in the past month, a significant drop from previous months. Corrective action was taken by Operations staff on one complaint and the other was received six days after the event. Responding to Neiahbors' Concerns We recently received a letter from the Southeast Huntington Beach Neighborhood Association (SHBNA) asking us to respond to a homeowner's allegations that the District has violated AOMD regulations and that we have paid thousands of dollars in resultant fines. We replied that under California law all businesses, including the District, are required to pay fees to the California Air Resources Board and the SCAOMD based upon the amount of air emissions. These fees are used by the regulatory agencies to administer their programs of issuing permits and inspecting facilities for compliance. These are the only fees we pay to regulatory agencies for air emissions and should not be interpreted as fines. The allegations of our noncompliance were included in a letter sent to SHBNA homeowners naming several sources of air pollution, including fire pits at beaches and the old Edison electric plant in Huntington Beach. The letter encouraged homeowners to call the AOMD directly to get the agency "to move" on the issue of air emissions, including odors from our wastewater plant. As part of our ongoing community relations program and commitment to responding in an expeditious manner to odor complaints, our response to the SHBNA also urged homeowners to continue contacting us directly with their questions, comments or concerns. During the past several months staff has been in contact with the SHBNA leadership, made presentations on our Strategic Plan to their membership and offered to host their meetings or a tour at Plant 2. SHBNA leadership has said the group is very pleased with our timely response to their inquiries and our efforts to control odors. Satisfied Costa Mesa Neighbors The Northerly Trunkline, which collects wastewater from the City of Costa Mesa, has been a source of odor. Staff has recently received two letters (attached) from residents in two different developments in Costa Mesa expressing their appreciation to District staff members Brian Reed and Marco Polo Velasco for their responsiveness in resolving what has been a long-standing odor problem. The source of the odor problems in both cases was odor migrating from our Northerly Trunkline into the City's connection (to our Trunkline) and then into the residents homes. Both residents expressed frustration in not being able to get someone to acknowledge that they had an odor problem and fix it. aq u Board of Directors Page 8 December 10, 1998 A couple months ago Brian Reed and Marco Polo Velssco were contacted by these residents concerning the odor problem. Through investigation and working closely with City of Costa Mesa staff, we were able to identify the connections that were causing the problems and install gas Flaps to prevent migration of odor in our Trunkline into the City's sewer system. District staff will continue to work with staff from the cities that we serve to identify and resolve odor problems. District Introduces Computer-based Training The Education and Training Division is introducing computer-based software training, which allows individuals to learn software applications directly at their desktop PC. Rather than dedicating a full or part day to offsite training, employees can now take courses at their own pace, at a time that works best within their regular daily responsibilities. Computer-based software training provides the agency with a cost- effective method to enhance staff s computer skills and is tailored for both the beginner and the expert. Below is a list of the courses offered: • Microsoft Office • Integrating Office • Word • Project • Excel • Windows NIT • PowerPoint • Networking • Access • FrontPage • Outlook The Education and Training Division, in conjunction with Graphics Services, developed the attached brochure to introduce the program to staff. Published Articles of Interest I have included several articles taken from various publications dealing with issues of importance to the District. These include the Kern County biosolids ordinance, Y2K, GWR, health care costs, water quality, supply and conservation. Holiday Office Hours The administrative office will be closed Thursday and Friday, December 24 and 25, and Friday, January 1. Operations staff will be on site at all times. Board of Directors Page 9 December 10, 1998 If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. I would like to wish all of you a happy holiday season. dMclnre Dona General Manager DFM:jt w Ewa or•uow.cu,.v+wrr*[as ro*ems ao+aasnawe ooc Attachments Orange County Sanitation District Education and Training Division Announces... SOFTWARE TRAINING ON DEMAND Check out our new software training now available at your desktopl Need help with the software that you are using? Try the new NETg Skill Builder Computer-Based Training courses. Our Skill Builder Library has courses for all the Microsoft software applications we use at the District. Microsoft Certified Courses Many of these courses can help you become Microsoft Certified. For more information on certifications offered, please contact the Education and Training Division. Skill Builder Library :> Microsoft Office Windows NT User Fundamentals • Word _ FrontPage • Excel Networking (For IT Professionals) • PowerPdnt • Access • Outlook • Integrating Office • Project Courses are assigned based on division needs and usage. Please discuss any needs you hove for additionol courses with your monoeer. Who to call for questions or help? If you have a problem using Skill Builder courses, call the Education and Training Division. Frequently asked questions... How do 1 log on? Log on by doing the following: 1) Click the Start button, 2) Point to Programs, and then SkillVantage, 3)Click on SkillVantage Manager, 4)Type your employee ID number (hit enter), 5)Type your employee ID number again (as your password) (hit enter). What is my Password? Use your employee ID number as your password. How do 1 change my password? Enter your employee ID number and password. Go to the menu bar, click on password, then click on change password. use une n November24, 1998 MEMORANDUM TO: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env. Director of Technical Services FROM: Deirdre Hunt Environmental Specialist II THROUGH: Michael D. Moore i7'I , Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Manager SUBJECT: Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board Inspection Over the course of three days, November 2, 3,and 9, 1998, Steve Mayville of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB)conducted a pre-announced inspection and sample collection at the District's two plants. The last sample collection and inspection by the CRWQCB was on May 13, 1998. On Monday morning, November 2, 1998, John Linder and Chris Cervellone (Construction Management)met with Mr. Mayville to discuss implementation of the new construction dewatering NPDES permit and related contract language. Mr. Mayville requested quarterly updates of off-site, groundbreaking Construction Management projects. Construction Management has already followed up by sending their first submission to Mr. Mayville. Mr. Mayville also raised a question involving Safety and Emergency Response and Engineering. His question was whether or not the District has implemented a change in contract language requiring secondary containment for on-site, mobile, fuel storage in response to the Slater Pump Station contractor diesel spill a few years ago. This question will be discussed at an upcoming NPDES permit issues meeting with Engineering. The inspector also met with Operations and Education 8 Training. Bob Ooten gave an overview of the current Operations'projects that include the addition of basins, a more efficient primary treatment polymer, improved hightpeak flow management, Kem County biosolids negotiations, and the status of the District's Y2k efforts. Terry Josway and Tom Flanagan responded to Mr. Mayville's questions on training, specifically the District's follow-up on the Bay Bridge Pump Station incident. Jerry Jones discussed the District's efforts for improving maintenance with an asset management program/database that has been developed over the past four years. Mr. Mayville requested the maintenance records for two pieces of the equipment as an example of the software's capabilities. OCSD . P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley CA 92728.8127 • (714) 962-2411 y;S �r Robert P. Ghirelli, D. Env. Page 2 November 24, 1998 Mr. Mayville's questions, regarding turbidity issues with Green Acres and recycle flows,were answered by Doug Cook and John Finias. Mr. Mayville requested that future Plant 2 recycle flows and their justification be discussed with the CRWQCB in a meeting, as opposed to a series of letters. The CRWQCB is strengthening their recycle flow policy because of heightened public awareness and possible skepticism since the influent readings are calculated to adjust for the recycle flows. Mr. Mayville also requested all the engineer's recycle flow calculations be submitted for the most recent belt press filtrate recycle flow. The belt press filtration calculations were submitted to the inspector during his Plant 2 tour. The remaining calculations will be submitted with a letter explaining the District's understanding that short-term maintenance recycle flows will not be pre-approved by CRWQCB staff, but the calculations will be submitted with the DMR. Mr. Mayville also mentioned that Certification Statements submitted with reports to the CRWQCB (annual reports and NPDES-required reports)should be bound inside the report. On Tuesday, November 3, 1998, Mr. Mayville was supplied with split samples from the three compliance-sampling locations (plants'influent and final effluent)and the Plant 1 and 2 bar screen influent. Unfortunately, the Plant 1 East influent sampler line was intermittently clogged and, caused missing sample periods. Laurie Bluestein, Environmental Sciences Laboratory (ESL), explained the irony of the situation, since such problems usually occur only once per year, and Mr. Mayville was very understanding. Operations and ESL have been quickly working to remedy the situation by: • Implementing grab samples every three hours; • Placing the best(newest)sampler on the sampling line with the best flow; and • Cleaning out the East diversion pipe. The Plant 1 tour was lead by John Finias and Mark Esquer with the assistance of Ron Wade. About two and a half-hours were spent walking through the entire treatment facility and observing representative unit processes on the afternoon of Monday, November 2, 1998. A similar tour of Plant 2 was lead by Doug Cook and Mark Esquer with assistance from Dave Heinz on Monday, November 9, 1998. In summary, Mr. Mayville was pleased with our Operations, Training, Maintenance, and Construction practices and Y2k efforts. If you have any questions or would like more information on Mr. Mayville's visit, please feel free to contact me at extension 7459. DEH:mcm H:\WP.DTA1TSQ550\31013111MEMOWOV 95 RWQCa INSPECTION.DOC c: C. Cervellone (730) J. Herberg (720) D. Cook (840) J. Linder(730) M. Esquer(820) D. Ludwin (710) J. Finias(830) S. Mowbray(630) K. Haddon (620) R. Colon (810) D. Heinz (840) ECM File r. ♦ NOV 29 '90 11:01 ER P[LLSaLRY MRDISUN 619 236 1995 To le P.02 =—A&i 'i Pillsbury �Ob LF7YY/Z -- t 4 Ky ' ATIMMVS AT uw 10,WEST aE Ay SURE RDJ $AND)SCAWSIP-OmMW16 I"i 1nrM4fA N. (SR)94f000 FA%(619)LSIRf ew.�ea' yu/.S.yarn>. Madison& Svtro LLP Nfimldma mY®Lcl�.' (619) 544-3177 November 24, 1999 VIA FACSIMILE TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST Re: In Re County of Orange Case No. 94-22272JR Dear Pool Participants: We continue to monitor the status of various post-confirmation issues in the County's bankruptcy case. Yesterday, District Judge Gary L. Taylor considered the County's various Motions for Good Faith Settlement Determinations regarding the County's settlements with a number of Defendants, including Merrill Lynch, KPMG, CS First Boston, Morgan Stanley, LeBoeuf, Bear Sterns, the Government Sponsored Enterprises and others. The County sought the Court's finding of good faith under the California Code of Civil Procedure and a finding that the settlements would discharge the settling defendants from future liability for contribution or indemnity- Various non-scaling parties raised oppositions to the County's request insofar as their rights to contribution or indemnity would be affected. While the County stressed the need to resolve these issues quickly so that the settlements could be consummated, the Court did not rule on the motions but took the matters under submission and will issue a written ruling. When we receive that ruling, we will notify you. If you have any questions, please call me. Very , ours, Patric ea cc: Official Investment Pool Participants Committee and Counsel •.w DuIA L6f.1MGeCES xEw xox[MANGE COVMY 1nGM@1101W FWC6C0 LIItON V. wA4pN -D.C.RY�9 zlzrzazs. •* TOTIL' PAGE.02 *Ir _ NOV 30 '98 11:26 FR PILLSBURY MADISON 6192361995 TO 18 P.02 tiw 11,25,99 14:46 ND.e67 P002 v FjC`M20 C t r-r=,-pa THOMAS W.HAYES,Represmmtrae ORANGE COUNTY LrnGATION;FUND 915 L Sheet Suite 1105 Sacrmaeaio, California 95814 , Press Release I o r Z Contact:James W.Mercer November 25,1998 He utwn,Memo b&a ft (213)694-7200 Orange County Litigation Settlement Agreement Thmnas W.Hayes,appointed by the Federal Bankrptcy Court to oversee legal actions taken on behalf of the residents of Orange County against legal and financial service providers,announced today that an agreement in principle has been reached with BC Capital �.to settle the case against that firm fdr$6 5W,000.00. According to Hayes,"The agreement is subject to approval-by the Court" This settlement brings total litigation recoveries to appro>aQlately$779,671,732.67 All distributions are made in conformance with the distribution schedule approved by the Bankruptcy Court. NOV 25 '98 14:51 P00E.02 NOV 30 '98 11:26 FR PILLSBV.RY MADISON 6192361995 TO 18 P,03 ✓' 11�A�Da 14:4D Mr.ns'r MOa3 T 3, op20 �'Et'P£h THObIAS W.HAYES,Representative ORANGE COUNTY LMGATION,FUND 915 L Stmi,Suite 1105 Sacrmuato, California 95814 Press Release Z-F z— Contact James W.Mercer November 25,J998 Hennigan,Merin&Bennett (213) 694-1200 Orange Cotmty Litigation Settlement Agreement; Thomas W-Hayes,appointed by the Federal Bankruptcy Court to oversee legal actions taken on behalf of the readents of Orange County against legal and financol service providers,announced today that an agreement in principle h-aass been reached wi C4 to settle the case against that firm fo($1,420,000.ut4 According to -� J Hayes,"The agreement is subject to approval by the Court" This settlement brings total litigation recoveries to approximately$791,091,732 67 All distributions are made in conformance with the distribution schedule approved by the Bankruptcy Court. •' NOV 25 '9B 14:52 .. ..... .....—._.__.__ , . PFOE.03 r�x TOTAL PAGE.03 »a DEC 03 '98 14:21 FR PILLSBURY MRDISOM 6192361995 TO IB P.02 _. .- .. .•� ••. •�.Mw u w a a rM ce- MI taY taraadra5l:# 3 Y THOM"W.HAYES, RepresenMtme ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND 915 L Street,Suite 1105 Sacramento,California 95814 Press Release 14.- 2— Conrad:James W. Mercer December 3, 1998 Hennigm,Mercer 6 Bennett (113)694-1200 Orange County Litigation Settlement Agreement Thomas W.Hayes,the litigation Representative appointed by the Federal Bankruptcy Court to oversee legal actions taken on behalf of Orange County against legal and financial service providers,announced today tbat an agreement in principle has been reached with Fuji Securities Inc.to settle claims against that firm concerning the liquidation of the securities subject at the time of the County's chapter 9 filing to reverse repurchase agreements between the County and Puji Seeuritie The County and Fuji Securities have also agreed that certain other of the County's dams against Fuji Securities are appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit having been resolved in Fuji Securities'favor at the District Court level by prior orders in the case. Specifically, the parties agreed that judgment should be entered with respect to Orange County's ultra yes suitability,negligence and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty claims against Fuji Securities an that an immediate appeal could be commenced. The County also agreed not to pursue Certain other claims against Fuji Securities. DEC 03 •90 12:04 o �mn,-+�. a•T •�+ DEC 03 190 14:22 FR PI LLSBORY MADISON 6192361995 TO 10 P.I 12- 9-96 :12:00PM. : H H A B FAX #2- MCI Fax Broadcast:# 4 Fuji Securities agreed to In an immediate payment of S7y00,000,-It Fuji Securities prevails on the County's appeal,no further payment will be due from Fup Securities. If the County prevails on appeal and the matter is remanded to the District Court,the County and Fuji Securities have agreed to cap any additional potential liability for Fuji Securities at$8,600A00. According to Hayes,"The agreement is conditioned on further action by the Court." According to Dean Jeske,a partner in the Chicago office of Foley&lardner representing Fuji Securities,"While Fuji Securities continues to believe that it acted properly in all of its dealings with the County,the settlement relieves it of the continuing burden and expense of litigating the County's remaining claims. With respect to the claims to be appealed,Fuji Securities is confident that the District Court rulings in its favor will be upheld." 1Ws settlement brings total litigation recoveries to approximate y\ All distributions will be made in conformance with the distribution schedule approved by the Banknlptcy Cuurt. 2- DEC 03 '98 12105 ^•" ^'. -•-- - DEC 03 •98 14:22 FR PIL.LSBL19Y MMISON 6192361995 TO IS P.B4 seem BIZ 12- 3-30 :12:OOPY : M M & B FAX n- MCI Fax Broadcast:# 5 THOKU W.HAYES,Represemtatfue ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND 975 L Street,Suite 770,5 Sacramento,Califvmia 95814 Press Release ZoF Contact:Jamux W.Merccr December 3, 1998 HmWgae,terra&Bennett (223)694-1200 Orange County Litigation Settlement Agreement Thomas W.Hayes,appointed by the Federal Bankruptcy Court to oversee legal action taken on behalf of the residents of Orange County against legal and financial service protidersr announced today that an agreenrint in principle has been reached Data Rayscher Corp.,I}IMI Rauschcr Inc,successor by merger to Rauscher Piero= Relsnes an usches Pierce RefsTus inc to settle the raves against the firm fnr §l0 000 000.00.,Acmrding to Hayes,"The agreement is subject to approval by the Court." his�settlement brings total litigation recoveries to approximately 1— f7966,991,732b7.� . 'G Alldistributions will be made in conformance with the distribution schedule approved by the Bankruptcy Court. DEC 83 'SO 12:05 2136941234 PPGE.05 *+ TOTFL PR5�.04 rums aeule in v.C. nanxtvpLcc tm at t.v ,wuuuu ews FGo le n ex FGO RANGE COUNTY BUSINESS NELP:� this way for new & used cars Friday, ecem December , 1998 2 Firms Settle in O.C. Bankruptcy for $17.9 Million n Court: The county's recovery from its $1.64-billion loss will now exceed $800 million. One major defendant remains. By E.SCOTT RECKARD. Times Staff 114iter wo more financial firms agreed Thursday to pay a total RELATED of$17.9 million to settle lawsuits over Orange County's 1994 bankruptcy, bringing the county's recoveries to ® PERSONAL more than S800 million and hastening a showdown over its FINANCIAL. remaining claims. PLANNING AND Dain Rauscher Inc., which advised the county and four INVESTMENTS school agencies on municipal bonds they issued in 1994, CONFERENCE agreed to pay $10 million. The county accused the firm of O.C.SECTIONS failing to sound alarms about the risks the county treasury was running. NEWS BY Fuji Securities Inc.. a onetime county broker, will pay $7.9 COMMUNITY million now and up to$8.6 million later if it loses some key SPORTS legal rulings on appeal. It was accused of providing illegal investments to the county and cheating the county when the PREP SPORTS firm sold securities it had held as collateral. BUSINESS Both firms denied any wrongdoing or contribution to the county treasury's loss of$1.64 billion but said they settled to LIFE&STYLE avoid further litigation expense. The agreements leave Standard & Poor's, a bond-rating CALENDAR service owned by McGraw Hill Cos.. as the only major CALENDAR defendant in the case. Fuji and Dain Rauscher had been set for trial before S&P, which the county now hopes to schedule for WEEKEND WEEK - - trial next March. HOME DESIGN "We have always believed that Standard & Poor's is one of the major lawsuits,and the settlement today puts the case on a COMMENTARY fast track." said James W. Mercer Jr., one of the county's T.V.TIMES lamwers. The suit contends S&P had a duty under its contract with the county to warn of the investment risks being taken by former Treasurer Robert L. Citron. S&P pronounced the treasury sound and rated the county's ADVERTISEMENT bonds highly in spring 1994. despite well-publicized warnings of impending financial calamity from John M.W. Moorlach. who was in the middle of an unsuccessful run for county treasurer. S&P "didn't do their homework." said Moorlach, who http://www.latimes.com/HOME,/NEWS/ORANGE/BUSINESS/t0001 10620.1uml 12/4/98 < nnns acute w �.�. uutu.ruptq tUt a i I.v ,.uuwu became the treasurer after the bankruptcy. "The% testified that everything was fine--and that gave a lot of public officials - z comfort that everything was fine." L' 4 ' S&P contends it was misled by Citron. who later pleaded guilty to financial felonies, and his assistant. Matthew Raabe, who was convicted of fraud. �► t9 tit McGraw Hill spokeswoman Leah Johnson said her firm will 0 soon file the latest in a series of motions asking the judge to dismiss the suit and will "fight it vigorously" at trial if those attempts fail. On another legal front,Thursday's settlements will hasten an appeal of an important court ruling against Orange County. At issue are Citron's investment techniques. To multiply his bets on low-interest rates. Citron borrowed billions of dollars from his brokers through financial arrangements known as reverse repurchase agreements. He reinvested the proceeds in hopes of making an extra profit. When rates rose sharply in 1994, the strategy compounded the county's losses. The county suits contend it was so risky it was illegal. But on a motion by Fuji, U.S. District Judge Gary L. Taylor ruled in October that state law permits treasurers to use reverse repurchase agreements, even to the extremes employed by Citron. Fuji's settlement allows the county to appeal that ruling immediately. The settlement includes $6.5 million to cover a claim that Fuji withheld proceeds from selling county securities it held as collateral for loans. On the claim that Taylor invalidated--providing illegal reverse repurchase agreements--Fuji agreed to pay$1.4 million now. Should appeals judges decide that the reverse repurchases were illegal, it agreed to pay up to$8.6 million more, capping a liability that otherwise could be much higher. A final decision on the issue will determine whether the county proceeds with pending lawsuits against 1 I Wall Street firms. The brokers include such well-known names as PaineWebber. Smith Barney. Prudential Securities and Kidder, Peabody. While they were minor plavers in the Orange County debacle, they could be forced to pay large damages if the county prevails in arguments that they furthered Citron's illegal strategies. The four Wall Street firms involved most deeply with Citron already have settled for$590 million, including a$420- million civil settlement by Citron's chief investment house, Merrill Lynch & Co. Settlements with the county total $799 million. When interest is included from settlement funds being held in escrow accounts, the amount exceeds$800 million. This week, Taylor week ruled that the first$701 million of those settlements were financially fair and had been made in good faith. But distribution of the funds has been held up by wrangling over how the amounts recovered so far will be used to offset any additional damages against Standard& Poor s and the I I brokers. http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NTEWS/ORANGE/BUSINESS/t0001 10620.html 12/4/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page It Date Subject Los s AngelesiTImes hLc_�u) 1�� � S r-t , /✓�tr t -- � WETLANDS ,k Ys DS into rid bay. Members have long �/�/�1 L�jv LJ Contended the waste water would include dangerous levels of heavy Group Sues to Stop Cumtnoed from el metals, phosphorous and organic Pump out mllbons of gallons of materials,encourage the growth of Potential Flow of Round water, which the regional ogy of tdheasaltt muspt the h.fragile where water board ruled a Canyon be flushed least two through Peters Beach Wash and species of protected birds into the Newport Beach bay. nest and where fish and other Nitrates Into Bay Tell road officials contend that am alsnaketherrhome. under natural tircumsancea the In October, an Orange County water would eventually end up in Superior Courtjudge sided with the TI MES STAFF WRITER HARRIS}fpyRS the bay oo its own, trickling down environmentalists in their quest to T San Diego Creek and into the eco- " the Irvine Ranch Water Dis- T wo months after winning a four-year system that is teeming with tare trict from pumping millions of court fight that prevents the pumping of bards,mud Rats and salt marshes.In gallons of highly treated waste waste water into Upper Newport Bay, exchange for allowing them to pump water into the bay. Judge Robert environmentalists have geared for directly into the bay, agency oBi- El Thomas called "erroneous" the another battle over potential conmamina- cials have agreed to intercept the eontention of the regional water water and treat it first to lower the hoard that the reclaimed water tion. would benefit the ba This time the group Defend the Bay u concentration of nitrates. y- challenging a regional water board's But Defend the Bay leaders dis- decision that would allow pumping of pute the agency's findings, saying 13 million gallons a day W ground water the water in question does not Row carrying nitrates from farmland into the into the my.In fact,attorney Mark fragilewetlands. Wolfe said it Bows the opposite "We win one but we can't take the way,with the stream from the bay gloves off," said group member Allan feeding into the aquifer where the Beek."Seems everybody wants to dump contaminated water is located. somethin out there.It's a hand lace." "There are some serious sben- 6 YP pro questions that have not been Beek'e group filed a lawsuit this week properly addressed here;' Wolfe asking a judge to revoke a Regional Water said."This permit went through an Quality Control Board order that gives quickly,without any real regard to contractors fin the Eastern Trampmeation the fact,,that were forced to take Corridor permisinon to discharge rutrate- contaminated water into Back Bay. Ni- action." tote contamination typically comes from Officials with the county Trans- fertilizers or animal waste portation Corridor Agencies said At issue is a stretch of the tog road near Wednesday they had not yet seen Peters Canyon Wash in Irvine, which u the lawsuit and were unaware that situated below the water table To build the Jan. 23 regional water board the road Saveedo Constructors must decision was being challenged. Place see Wl.'19.AND6,Be the tiling is the latest move in the fight by Defend the Bay to prevent waste from being Bushed �''�-;. � '` ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST•SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701.714/834-3320 November 9, 1998 Donald F.McIntyre,General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Dear Mr.McIntyre: On behalf of the 1998-99 Orange County Grand Jury,I want to thank you for providing our Env ronment/Transportanon Committee with an interview on Thursday,October 29. We want to thank you for your time and for sharing your opinions on the issues being raised concerning the sanitation district. I hope we may call on you again should the need arise. Very truly yours, 1998-99 ORANGE f/OUNTY GRAND JURY Sheldon S. Singer Foreman SSS:cd 14 ILI _ '.- -----�` �,rwc��' .cw•� ��.��_x__ Gum--C��-�` -��cw�.a:�_ _ 76 Gr - --- CG2�r��--_ . 10, _ � :.�,.i,.r✓_.-Fes•%�s�.. - _�-u-F-_j'L..c��_.���..� ati�i ,�j/uti..� �-s-v�-� �T. _ice/w• - � - -- / . .. �gGi'1J I�IYKR.O l��l�� ��L''...�tZL.. . _. . _ _ � - - - j� --- w-- -. �- -- - �J �ry`�-�j � -------- -------- ._-�._----- - - ----.. _._. .. - -- K �i � �r �, - - - --- ant,. d. i,so i :ULra J b Unn:cn 114'17t-LJ]1 Debby Mccormick 1451 Shamrock Ln Costa Mesa, Ca 92626 (949)549-7373 Fax Memorandum Date. 1213198 Fax: 714 962 8379 To: OCSD Ann: Ed Tones From: Debby McCormick Fax: (949) 752-1997 Dear Mr. Torres, My neighbors and I had noticed afoul odor in our neighborhood for years. We realized it probably was the sewer lines.I called OCSD and was connected with a Mr. Brian Reed. He worked with the city of Costa Mesa when they were "stonewalling"me. To make a long story short, he understood, diagnosed, and feed our problem. 1 can not say enough about your Mr. Reed He strikes me as a professional and a skilled expert in his field.It is so refreshing to have an employee that is willing to go the distance to help the residents.l will be eteraallygrateful to Mr. Reed for his effective result to our long, longproblem. Thankyou. Re e try McCo nick Ag groups denounce use of sludge page I of Join Us ! nems Die-AkthrrsInib Californian Ag groups denounce use of sludge Filed: November 30, 1998 By WENDY OWEN Californian staff writer email:wowen(albakersfield.com Local farmers opposed to using treated human waste to fertilize fields in Kem County got a boost Monday when three major California agriculture organizations, representing thousands of growers and processors across the state,joined their cause. The Western Growers Association, California Citrus Mutual and the California Grape and Tree Fruit League publicly denounced the use of "biosolids" during a press conference Monday and announced their membership in the Kern Food Growers Against Sewage Sludge. The organization includes several thousand San Joaquin Valley farmers, growers and producers who have joined together to voice their opposition to the use of"sewage sludge," as they call it. The material is human waste that has been filtered and cooked, then used as crop fertilizer. Another group of sewage generators, investors and farmers is working to support the continued application of biosolids. The controversy over the use of the material has grown over the last two years, with farmers coming down on both sides of the issue. In some cases, producers who normally compete in the marketplace have teamed up to fight for or against the issue. Sludge opponents aren't against the 10,000 tons of locally treated human waste that is spread annually on Kem County fields. They're unhappy about the I million tons of biosolids shipped each year from Los Angeles and Orange counties for use on Kem County land. About 40,000 acres of Kem farmland received applications of biosolids last year. The anti-sludge group has gathered more support during the last several weeks with the addition of 14 local farmers and three water districts— Delano-Earlimart Irrigation, Kern Delta Water and Southern San Joaquin http://www.bakersfiield.com/top/i--l299656727.asp 12/1/98 Ag groups denounce use or sludge Page 2 o1A y Municipal Utility. Proponents of biosolids aren't interested in compiling lists of supporters, said Michael Tumipseed,a spokesman for pro-biosolids people. Rather, the group is spending its energy compiling research to prove the harmless nature of biosolids,he said. Little has changed in the arguments between the two groups. Those wanting to ban biosolids on private land cite inconsistent studies of its safety, potential danger to groundwater, heavy metals in the material as well as pharmaceuticals, viruses and other bacteria, such as e-coli,that may be in the material. The anti-biosolids group consists largely of fruit, vegetable and nut producers who are worried not only about actual threats to their crops but what consumers might believe. "We just can't afford one incident, even if it's a perceived incident," said Kevin Andrew, senior vice president of Sun World Inc. Andrew said it's easy for produce retailers to say, "'We're just not going to buy produce from Kem County."' Many growers have already been warned by their buyers, such as Delmonte and Heinz,that they will not accept food grown in soil that has ever had biosolids applied to it. Those supporting sludge use say the material is safe and note that biosolids are limited to non-food crops, such as alfalfa and cotton, so there should be no concern from food producers. "They're neglecting the science here," Tumipseed said,adding that the Environmental Protection Agency and others have said biosolids are safe. "The food growers almost seem to have a phobia against biosolids," he said. More information is expected on sludge research Thursday when the Biosolids Ordinance Advisory Committee hears specialists on both sides of the issue. The meeting begins at 2 p.m. at the county Public Services Building at 27th and M streets. ® ® O back back to top home Col%lgh10189a,The BaEgrsle G eli mIan I Email the IN Om aster Asaotlaletl Preas oovmhl aria vaq'Police statement http://www.bakersfield.com/top/i--I299656727.asp 12/1/98 .�• ... .. u .uo Y.u-. .u.. ....• cP.�. on.P,wV �Uul �g42D cFTr'C(L € A T, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY e WASHINGTON, D.C. 204M DEC 1 B98 OFFM of WAMR Statement Of Dr. Alan B.Rubin,Senior Scientist,Biosolids'1'earn, Office of Water,United States Environmental Protection Agency,Washinglon,D.C. Before the Kem County Riosolids Ordioance Advisory Committee in Bakersfield California December 3, 1998 Good Afternoon: The United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)appreciates the oppomitury to deliver the following statement to the Kem County Biosolids Ordinance Advisory Committee. EPA has had a long-standing policy to encourage the beneficial recycling of biosolids in various land application prautices. in these applications,biosolids perform both as a fertilizer providing plant nutrients and as a soil amendment where coil characteristics are improved by the addition of organic matter. The use or disposal of biosolids.including the use of biosolids as a fertilizer, is regulated at the Federal level by the 40 CFR Part 503 Rule which was promulgated by EPA in February, 1993. T can assure you that the land application of biosolids as a fertilizer in accordance with this regulation and appropriate State regulations protects public health and the environment with a large margin of safety.To support this conclusion, EPA has studied the potential impacts on human health and the environment front the recycling of biosolids on land. These studies have been conducted during the past thirty yeatx by eminent soil scientists and agronomists primarily from land grant universities and by Federal and State regulatory agencies throughout the United States and the rest of North America In addition, observations and data collected from hundreds of biosolids land application projects throughout the United States including California have augmented the data base on biosolids recycling. This data base clearly demonstrates the safety of biosolids recycling and has been used in the risk assessment as the technical basis of the Part 503 Rule. Drs. Chaney and O'Connor are just two of the many excellent agronomists, soil scientists, and academicians that have generated this extensive data base. I recognize that this committee has received voluminous data and opinions on the safety of the land application of biosolids. I ask that this committee critically examine the types of information that you have received. The information that has been presented to you that strongly suggests the safety of biosolids land application is based on a vast amount of documented,peer-reviewed (L J) PYYCMY1�iC�NqR�01f VV a"'y^�eMetSba^pd,a rta empirical evidence, not on allegations,theory, or undocumented media reports. While it is fair to say that 100%agreement among the scientific community has not been achieved on this issue,it is certainly fair to say that a strong majority of scientists support the land application of biosolids based on the available data. On the other hand,the opponents of the laud application of biosolids cannot offer much in the way of hard data to support their position.For the most part, the opponents rely on data from biosohds projects of many years past before pretreatment programs, development of appropriate biosolids management techniques, and certainly before adequate Federal and State regulations were in place. The opponents also heavily rely on unproven innuendo and undocumented media reports of alleged human health and environmental impacts from biosolids. I have placed into the record of this committee, a copy of a publication entitled"Biosolids Fact Sheets"which illustrates the time and expense it takes to either disprove or verify anecdotal information on alleged negative impacts from biosolids land application practices. A reading of this document will show that in almost every case, the initial assertions of harm from biosolids were shown to have no merit. Finally, I urge this committee to develop an ordinance that is based on science and quality data, not on fear and unage.I recognize that the public expects to eat foods that are wholesome and free of contamination. This is appropriate.However, their expectations can only be achieved by requiring that all materials that are used to grow the food that they eat are of appropriate quality an are used in an appropriate agronomic manner whether they be biosolids, animal manures, or inorganic fertilizers. Of this trio,the only member that is regulated at both the Federal and State levels to assure the material's quality and proper application is biosolids.Ladies and Gentlemen of the committee, I invite you to ensure that all these materials used in farming attain this state of quality and proper management by implementing a scientifically sound biosolids ordinance that some day may be used for the other nutrient sources used in your agricultural industry in Kern County. ..owed: la, 2146 J:2.Fu: ee6 bat roc,/ I - --- io n ov.....— ..v - • FROM: CC SANITATION FP% "0. 1 562 695 8660 :2-02-98 03; IMP P .02 • tAAt1 L E T r`rr2 UNI VERSrFY OF CAUFORPIIIA AT BERKELEY —(LAC �Z_ ruraaY care mVt6 tOr ANaatH M9a@a . rWCR)D UxaWKAm raafa WaYa lwaa(el'[ /rIB SSQ 6821 e.Aee[`EX M LSMCaTMO —_ —_ P (a51�)ms.Pfil aUK=Y.Ca1,I10124a Oe 3= 6iaa6 besa.Aua4trkY.ea December 1, 1998 Honorable Chairman Parrs Kem County 11L5 TruxtunAvanue,5a Floor Bakersfield, U 93301 Dear Chairman Parra: We have a serous health problem in America today. It has little in do with the areas in which w many health regulatory dollars are Spent- It IS the lack of fruits and vegetables and adcmnutrients I the diet of many Americans. Along with smoking,this dietary Imbalance is one of the greancst causes of rancor and 12 health. Although dais dietary imbalance is present In Mary Americarw,it is mat common in the pow who often don't have the money tobuy the needed(rides and vegetables to prevent cancer. The quarter of the population eating the fewest fruits and vegetables has about double the canter rate for motif types of cancer of the quarter eating the most 80%of American children and adolescents and 68% of adults do not eat the five portions a day that they should be eating.About a third of cancer is believed due to unbalanced diets, and much of that may be due to insufficient mlcronutriehts, such as the viramiru and trace minerals needed to guard our DNA 1roM damage. Defldertcy of vitamins folic acid, Ba,012,C,E,and the Mace mbarala selenium,iron,stuff rinc lead to broken duomosomex which in hum leads to carte.The main source of Many of dose miam.utnntre is fruits and vegetables Therefore,you'll find acre on the side of any program that increases agricultural production, such as the use of pesticide which reducethe cost of fruits and vegetables to the public, and especially to the poor. My Colleague,Luis Swirsky Cold,and I would be glad to provide any information you need to - prove to you the Importance of this issue Our cancer problems in this country cart frm m+oking and bad diets,not from tiny tracts of synthetic chemicals, I urderslard there a currently an issue before your goad that relates to this same matter, albeit indirectly. The issue of biowlids utillmtim on famdand, like traces of pesticide residues. with W of it's existing federal regulation,is simply a narLsue when it aces to health ,orhCans Both are highly regulated arena,both have the pounn al to help crop production and neither should be an issue for sear, teclir,that create public conm,n or panic in area,of mbJmal concern to hunun health. To attack the recycling of biceblida atdo farmland as enme kind of a serious public health ce even a public perception is Misguided in my view. It is not an issue On the public's radar screen odes FaCa1VYC: lam/ 1/btl a.eo I. eec e7e eeo„ -� .,..av c..•• a�•.�a..v..,, -v FROM: CO SANITATION FAX NO. : 562 695 0660 12-02-98 03:15P P.03 December I, 1998 Page 2 you choose to crake it one yourselves. As far as the environmental Cmurrurdy is concerned. recycling of biceolids.has been considered a positive step, whereas the envirormerital groups have both fertilizer and pesticide use very high on their agenda. Many faradands suffer from lack of mkmnuuients because they were copped out and sent to toms in the food with nothing to replace them. The nutrogel and phosphonu is renewed by fertilizer use,but the other miormutrietts (think of you vitamin pills with minerals) are simply not returned to the land. This is a esious-W" when It ernes to healthy cell growth,both in plants and in people. Biorolids recycling is simply taking the mieonutrients that went to town in food products and putting them back an the land when they belong. Of ctxuse, they went through treatment prc ses, but those are the same treatment prooteaen used in nature to recycle organic material. We have obviously bemme an easy sodety to scare — the more exotic, the mwa scary. I appeal to you to get On with the business of reducing ounce N Aaarka by encouraging fruit and vegetable producacnandcomumption andbyhelpinga keep the prices low. Them are already toomanyheaith scares about miniscule, implausible risks that confuse the public and divert resou cas Item the major important issues that will really maize a difference,cued as getting Amelira on a better diet I am aware of the esbabl shmmt of your review panel for this.issue(the Bieoolids Ordintuuc Advisory Board) and would be delighted to be of any amwaI ee that I=L Sincerely, •/��] //�� Dr.Bruce N.Ames, Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Director of National Institute of Environmental Health Sdeuss Center, Urdveasity of Caldomia, Berkeley Biosolids safety disputed Page I of the Securi y ProfeSS1081F! news Slr iMikersarib Qaldrimimt Biosolids safety disputed Filed: December 3, 1998 By WENDY OWEN Californian staff writer e-mail: wowenubak r fiCld.com Experts from across the United States spent nearly four hours in front of the Biosolids Ordinance Advisory Committee(BOAC) on Thursday discussing the safety of sewage sludge used as crop fertilizer. For each well-researched point, a counterpoint emerged. In the end, it seemed only one issue remained unanswered — public perception. BOAC is gathering information on sludge as it develops regulations for its application in Kern County. Currently, about 1 million tons of sludge is transported from the Los Angeles area to Kern County farmers requesting it. It is restricted to non- food crops such as alfalfa and cotton. Sludge is a mixture of human and industrial waste. It includes everything that goes down the drain in homes and factories. The material is then filtered and heated to eliminate part of the worms, bacteria, heavy metals and viruses. The experts at the BOAC meeting, ranging from a University of Florida professor to a U.S. Department of Agriculture research agronomist, presented the results of studies on biosolids, complete with chemistry formulas. The pro-biosolids experts maintained that sludge is safe and Rufus Chaney, senior research agronomist with the USDA, led the way. Chaney assured the committee that the federal regulations for biosolids were based on field research and target the highest risk factor. The filtering and heating required cleans the biosolids enough to be eaten in miniscule doses, Chaney said. http://www.bakersfield conJtop/i--1299398140.asp 12/4/98 Biosolids safety disputed Page 2 of 3 "The risk assessment presumes a child eats 200 milligrams a day," he said. Experts on the anti-sludge side introduced Gam Wallace, a former UCLA professor and current agriculture consultant from El Segundo, to refute the safety of the federal regulations. Wallace concentrated on heavy metals and noted the federal rules don't consider the metals combining to form volatile mixtures. Copper and zinc combine to create a toxin, he said. Other combinations can make the metals more soluble so a plant can absorb it. Wallace noted that his studies showed some plants absorbed more than others. He found that spinach soaked up lead in large amounts from soil that didn't contain biosolids. He anticipated even more if sludge was applied. "I've since stopped eating spinach," he said. Wallace said metals can remain in the soil forever unless plants absorb them or erosion sweeps them away. He recommended Kern County run its own tests before deciding on sludge. Even pro-biosolids experts agreed that sludge contains some nasty stuff. George A. O'Connor, professor at the University of Florida's Soil and Water Science Department, discussed the pollutants, many of which are not regulated in sludge because of their tiny portions. "The pollutants in biosolids are badies," O'Connor said, but most are in such microscopic amounts that they are harmless. He added that he uses biosolids in his own backyard. He noted that PCBs are the only worry among pollutants and can emerge in larger quantities, though they are still safe. O'Connor said it is foolish to believe that all traces of pollutants must be removed before biosolids are used. But he advocated continued monitoring for pollutants. He said organic toxin pollutants, like PCBs, need continued study of effects on the human hormonal system. "They don't make it into the sewage sludge usually. Nevertheless, they need our attention," he said. The experts agreed that research studies won't overcome the public's perception. It's the same perception that scared people away from strawberries last year and apples several years ago. Both fruits were later determined to be safe. Ronald Talbot, laboratory director for the Kern County Department of Public Health, was among the roomful of people at the meeting and said http://www.bakersfield.com/top/i--1299398140.asp 12/4/98 Biosolids safety disputed Page 3 of 3 he was impressed with the information, but he wasn't completely satisfied. "I'm still concerned about the perceived risk," he said, adding he believes biosolids are safe, but his experience at the department of health has proven it takes a lot to change public perception. USDA's Chaney wouldn't address the issue, saying people need to look at the science. "1'm not here to deal with perceptions," he said. A first draft of the biosolids ordinance is scheduled to come before the Kern County Board of Supervisors on Jan. 12, but the committee plans to ask for an extension. 0 ® O bacY G k W rop hmw COPtagM IM.TM 30l m ld Cali Wn I E.d Iha Wp�{js ps iaiw Press Cyv ht Neon I Privacy Pwi Slalemanr http://www.bakersfield.com/top/i--1299398140.asp 12/4198 Kern fanners irate over report that slams pesticide use Pagel of 2 fPBf A1611Communication 805Z61-2100 business news MrWakrrgirIDCalifuntaii Kern farmers irate over report that slams pesticide use Filed: November 12, 1998 By STEVEN MAYER Californian staff writer e-mail:smayer6a0akersfield.enm Kern County farmers and government pesticide regulators severely criticized an anti-pesticide report released Wednesday by an environmental group, calling it misleading and an example of irresponsible "hit-and-run" activism. The report, "Generations at Risk: How Environmental Toxicants May Affect Reproductive Health in California," said that commonly used chemicals may be linked to birth defects and other reproductive disorders. The report was produced by California Public Interest Research Group and Physicians for Social Responsibility. A story summarizing the report ran in Wednesdays Bakersfield Californian. But longtime Kern County family farmer Don Camp and others said the report unfairly paints growers as "bad guys." "I have to take offense at the suggestion that we are causing children to be born with defects," Camp said. "When reports like this are published, let's get some good scientific analysis behind it before we start shooting from the hip." Camp said he was particularly disturbed by a graphic published in the report and reproduced alongside the Californian story that identified Camp's farm, D.M. Camp& Sons, as the largest applicator of those pesticides identified in the report as dangerous to reproductive health. The chemicals named in the report included methyl bromide, metam sodium, diazinon and dozens of others. "The notion that we could be No. I in the state in the application of these pesticides is grossly wrong," Camp added. A spokesman for CALPIRG said the group stands by its statistics, but the http://www.bakersfiield.com/busri--1301228923.asp 11/16/98 Kern farmers irate over report that slams pesticide use Page 2 of 2 report strongly suggests that its list of top 10 applicators is subject to error. "Because growers often report pesticide use separately for each farm, a grower with farms scattered across the state would not be represented in the top 10 users if none of his or her individual operations were among the 10 largest users," the report states. "Thus there may be other proprietors with multiple operations who, in aggregate, use more pesticides than those applicators listed." While noting that Kem County is a major user of farm pesticides, county Agricultural Commissioner Ted Davis said the CALPB2G report is encouraging a common misconception: that the use of pesticides is the same as exposure to pesticides. "Two of those pesticides—methyl bromide and metam sodium—have some of the highest buffer zone restrictions in Kern County," Davis said. That means those chemicals and others cannot be used within specified distances around sensitive areas, including neighborhoods and schools. In addition, workers must wait for a specified period of time before re- entering the field after spraying. Davis said researchers in his department tried to re-create some of the numbers cited in the report, but could not determine how the report's authors reached their conclusions. "Our whiz computer guy cannot figure out how they came up with those numbers," Davis added. "That's the basic problem with these reports. They don't let anybody peer review them. How do they arrive at these figures?" m ® O Lank L k to by I... CoprgW 1M.The 80en d CalaMMan I E.0 au Tema W AMQdMW Fan Ca hl NO"I FMacv P ft 5101a M http://www.bakersfield.com/busfi--l301228923.asp 11/16/98 Some Want More Aggressive Plan to Purify Waste Water Page 1 of 2 News ao ite Index �o ! ORANGE COUNTY NEWS �qp HELP? this Itl� Y Y I Ir .{ J�IIt y�r� LI I Wednesday, December 9, 1998 Some Want More Aggressive Plan to Purify Waste Water ■Utilities: Comments at hearing are positive on proposed $400-million Groundwater Replenishment System. By HARRISON SHEPPARD, Special to The Times proposal to purify waste water and recycle it as tap RELATED ......:water for homes drew positive response at a public hearing Tuesday. O.C.SECTIONS "Our analysis shows this is probably the most innovative MAIN PAGE project to come forth in Orange County in a long time as far as water is concerned," said Tony Aguilar of the Hispanic NEWS BY Chamber of Commerce of Orange County. He was one of a COMMIIMTY dozen speakers at the hearing, which drew about 50 people to the Fountain Valley headquarters of the Orange County Water SPORTS District. PREP SPORTS Some even suggested that the project might not go far enough in reclaiming water. And the only real challenge was a BUSINESS question about whether laying the pipeline might interfere with the operations of a golf course in Santa Ana. SO CAL LIVING Don Schulz of the Surfrider Foundation, an environmental CALENDAR group, said the project would be good and suggested a more "aggressive" alternative. CALENDAR "We would like to see eventually a goal that most or all of WEEKEND the water is recycled," he said. Iry Pickler, board member of the water district and chairman HOME DESIGN of the committee that held the hearing, said the panel has yet to COMMENTARY hear any major complaints about the project, which means that it is likely to win approval in the spring. T.V.TIMES "We're trying to get negative input, but we can't seem to get it," Pickler said. The proposed $400-million Groundwater Replenishment System would treat about 40% of the waste water from homes in north and central Orange County and make it clean enough ADVERTISEMENT for eventual household use. The purified water would be pumped into the ground-water basin and eventually sent into homes in an area west of a line drawn from Yorba Linda to western Irvine. Allixncc'. http://www.metahollywood.com/HONIEfNEWS/0RANGE/t0001 12442.html 12/9/98 Some Want More Aggressive Plan to Purify Waste Water Page 2 of 2 Officials of the county water district and the Orange County Sanitation District are proposing the project, saying it would be the largest of its kind in the world and could lead to much wider use of treated waste water, as well as cheaper desalinization of ' ' ' • ocean water. a They say the project is needed because the north and central county population, now 2 million, is expected to grow by about 800,000 in the next 20 years. Without the project, the 50 billion additional gallons a year required would have to be imported from the Colorado River and Northern California. Officials say the project would not raise rates because of savings in energy and water acquisition costs. +Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved 6 Search the=him of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: WATER DISTRICTS—ORANGE COUNTY,WATER—ORANGE COUNTY,WATER RECLAMATION. You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. News NED Site Intlex o0 http://vw v.metahollywood.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000112442.htm1 12/9/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject •-�'1'�1-,�t.{�i-a-.�T' 1 0�..�:�:<: � 5 �/�r6� �ov�&r..f.e..2 Concerned about about future water in Orange County? The Orange County Water Dinriet and the Orangge Counm Sanitation District ate(costing a public workshop to(eniliuire you with a pmpmed pmjmt Bled the Orou Acot-f Replems ment$ys¢m'The gnrem will pmdun 100.000 acre(sn of oew water,moult/ro Wyse abr needy ef7110,0o0 Orange 6 ueryfnmit,pry yrar.One week later.we invite sou to attend a public hearing where you c wice your opiniom about the Gmuodwater Rrylmuhmcna gYntm. Isom anew( Voice year opiniom Gm.idw+:n Reyk �Ameni4D .b`aoh,Aep Gm 5:30,a.y T.. q,D .I, ,0 zap.m..%amy.o«.mbal s:30p.m.,Tueday,Deambera mdeHM.wnpr,gnnnn+nWryw,.+w�, LA,w:r,wwN„u,wn,Lrvn Join us an Ormgc County Wamr Dlnnn 105N FJI4 Avenue Immer of Do An.a Ward.SO Foumm.Valley.CA Grourdwater yi.r n�w u.w�x„M rm,4 M,w a.,r•G,y,r+„e.u u.a.,,,p.x n.... pw„a1 n..3aa�.u,„-iu re-a:uo.,aa,d�d�.r am,..>:ussi.,uo. aJ PepkWIvent$stem Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings /� Name of Paper Section Page # Date -p//� Su�bj�ectpq �} FOUNTAIN VALLEY The Orange County water Dln that Is hosOng an span house today to educate residents about the proposed Groundwater Re- plenishment System.a water pu- rification protect that would sup- ply 200,000 county residents every year.The system will take highly treated waste water and purify it to drinking water stand- ards. 7be open house is 2 to 7 pan.at the district headquarters, 10500 Ellis Ave., Fountain Val- ley.Information:(714)378-3351. —Harrwn swppar6,(714)966-5977 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Narne of Paper Section Page # Date Sub'ec[Orange County Register � /� /�� � 3 t5d WL . ,�nnoy,�.�- FOUNTAIN VALLEY The Orange County Sanitation and Water Districts will unveil a proposed water-purifica. tion Project during an open house from 2 to 7 p.m. today at the Orange County Water District, 10500 Ellis Ave. The public will have an op. pmmnity to leam how the ultraviolet,reverse-osmosis and micmfiltration system will be combined with a nat- ural-penwation process to purify water from the Ana- heim area. Information: public information specialist Ron Wilderanuth, (714)3'g- 3200. —Diana Taman (714)4e5E6e7 Pacific clippings Oogt office box 1178g MAU am, din. 82711 Placentia%ws Wceby NO" 12 1998 Mayor discusses wastewater treatment plan TWO million People mend for new, safe and reliable water and sanitation districts in enough water to 200,0110 families Isn't the water that comes hom water,the districts came up with Fountain Valley through micro throughout north Orange County. Northern Celdomia and Colorado would be provided the Groundwater Replenishment filtration, reverse osmosis and ► what Is the biggest problem this River good enough? withpurified ter - System to re-use wastewater purification. protect lama? Many people don't realize that p water now dumped into the ocean. These plants would treat 100 - The biggest problem is the cost the greatest treasure Orange By yefcel,Roles Placentia Mayor Norman Eck- percent of the water, which of the project, which is at $400 County has is its groundwater. Placentia News-Times enrude — the chairman of the would then be pumped along the million.So far,we have received The executive directors from the Orange County Sanitation Dis- Santa Ana River through a 13- $24 million from the Environ- water district and the sanitation The Orange County Water Dis- trict No.2—discusses the advaa- mile pipeline to the Anaheim mental Protection Agency, the district got together and said, trict and the Orange County San- .tages to this system. Lakes. By the time that water sanitation district has $140 mil- 'How can we serve the growth in itation District distribute water ►What exactly Is the groundwater gets down into the aquifers, it , lion saved up to replace the pipe- population and how can we save to approximately 2 million peo- replenishment system? - will have been treated six times; line and the water district has taxpayers money" pie in the north and central Or. The conception started about twice at the sanitation district, $100 million set aside to build the The water that we would be sage County areas. two years ago with the district's three times at the water district plants.So we are shy about $150 getting from these plants would By 2020, that population is ex- i finance committees. Water that and Mother Nature does the last million, which we hope to get be better than the Colorado Riv. pected to increase to 3 milliot ''is currently being dumped into job. from state and federal grants. To help meet this growingde- fheoceanwouldbetreatedatthe The end result would supply it,What is the mason for doing this? Please see WATER/7 pipelines. The water will be test- plenishlrg project? treatment facilities to produce facilities toproduce 75,000 acr, WATER it every day, so there's no way The project has been broken 50,000 acre-feet of water per year fSet Of wateread plisse lll,toQ any contamination could occur. down into three phases of five- by 2003.. __ I FROM 3 i ► Do other water districts and sang- year increments. Phase II;-t0 be coin Ie1ed P efad'by:202q would`re'sult l er because reverse osmosis al- tffWn districts In the country do Phase I includes . building 2010 will e p by total treatment of 100,000 am lows only water molecules to thleT - r aPand ltrfPYWt feet of water PenyedesAQ14 rt pees through, eliminating all Yes;thief hdoae In Virginia - �'�'� —• ••ter �+.•.., -.+n-a:wa ' n) :. e: 't.' , v ))'.!' contaminants. . . . (The Metro- and several other places that I politan Water District) does not can't remember right now. But treat their water through reverse this will be the largest redama- osmosis. lion project in the country, ► How would this saw taapayere pumping 100 million gallons a rummy? day. The average price of water ► What shies would this project from the Colorado River is S431 serve? an acre-foot, which is approro- This would serve 200,000 fam. mately enough water to fill a ilies—we estimated four people football field. In the long term, ppeer family—in the cities of Ana. the cost of an acre-foot of water heim,Villa Park,Santa Ana,Or- from the Anaheim Ickes would ange, Brea and most cities in be $371. north and central Orange Coun. ►Have you received any opposi0on ty. to this project? 0-How would this beri Placentia None at all. We have big cam. residents? panies such as the Irvine Water Because we have contracts Co., Irvine Co., Disneyland, with the Yorba Linda Water Dis. Fluora Corp. and the Orange trict and the Southern California County Business Association that Water District for yyears to come, have endorsed us.The Surfriders residents will not be able to use Association is also backing us. this water. But we will be able to As long as we build the plants divert that water for our parks and do what we say we're going and recreation needs. to do, then they believe in us. Also the water and sanitation ►How can residents be assured district has given the school dis- that this wastewater will be treated trict the right to tap into that property and safe to drink? pipeline.This project helps us in- The Orange County Health De- directly because it takes a load partment will be out there check- off the water demands in other ing the water. The controls are areas that the districts supply to. there making sure the water is ► When will thecllles beabls loreap safe before it,can,get into the . the benefits off this groundwater R III L N06, Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippingsy Name of Paper Section Page# Dat Subject i�e FOUNTAIN VALLEY Efforts to develop a system to purify waste water and use It to replenish Orange County's underground water basin re- cently,received$500,000 in fund- ing from legislation signed by President Clinton. The Ground- water Replenishment System. to be located in Fountain Palley and run jointly by the county water and sanitation districts, is expected to cost between $3.50 million and 5900 million to com- tete by 2020. The system will take treated waste water.which is normally released into the ocean, and purify it using a variety of techniques. —ffo n SSrppard.r710966-59r1 • Plan would turn waste water to drinking water Paee 1 of 4 _ F technology Home Page _ m Autes�s M z»c w�xcr<ourm uGur� - � ' ocregister tl>oio : .. Plan would turn waste water to drinking water ENVIRONMENT:The liquid, now pumped to reohneby sea, would be filtered and returned to the Edge of Nature uex ground to boost supply and keep rates our unFmc. down. December 2. 1998 By OLIVIA HAWKINSON The Orange County Register FOUNTAIN VALLEY— The skies were wet and Al gloomy Tuesday afternoon, but folks inside the Orange County Water District headquarters talked of drought and water shortage. Water officials and their neighbors from the Orange County Sanitation District held an open house to show off plans for the unique ground-water filtration system. The $400 million system would allow highly treated waste water to seep into the underground beds that hold much of Orange County's future supply of drinking water. The research for what would be the largest project of its kind in the nation has gone on for eight years, but water district officials want to rally county residents' support before the project comes to a vote in March. If approved by water district board members, fmal design will begin next year and the project's first phase will be completed in 2003. The filtration project could keep water costs down, ease water rationing during droughts, boost supplies for the county's rapidly growing population and make http://%N v .ocregister.com/science/waterx02w.shtml 12/7/98 Plan would turn waste water to drinking water Page 2 of 4 ' better use of waste water that now is pumped out to sea. The project would add enough water to the supply annually for about 800,000 people by 2020 —the expected population growth for that time frame. Now serving about 2.2 million people north of the El Toro "Y," the water district would continue to rely on imported water from Northem California and the Colorado River. The water district is the wholesale agency responsible for managing and protecting the ground-water basin serving 23 cities and water agencies in north and central Orange County. The sanitation district collects, treats and disposes waste water in those areas. Despite the rosy outlook, the board will not approve the plan without firm public support, said Michelle Tuchman, spokeswoman for the sanitation district. In a team effort, the districts have used newsletters, telephone surveys and public hearings to educate residents. "There's cactus growing not far from my house," Tuchman said. "It's a constant reminder this is a desert. We have to manage our water resources." Consultants, representatives from community groups such as the Rotary Club and a handful of local residents attended the open house in the water district's board room. Curious residents asked: How much is it going to cost? How will it affect my water rates? Is it safe? The project would be funded entirely by loans and grants to the districts, not by bond measures, said water district senior engineer Tama Snow. The districts have secured about S20 million in grants, $500,000 from the federal government and $790,000 from the California Energy Commission. Snow said the project will be kind to residents' wallets. http://www.ocregister.com/sciencetwaterx02w.shtmi 12/7/98 Plan would tum waste water to drinking water Pace 3 of 4 "If we don't do the project, rates will go up," she said. "The project is rate-neutral. Our only water alternative is importing more water if it's available, or sea-water desalination. Both are very expensive." The quality of the system's water will exceed that of the Santa Ana River, which currently feeds the district's ground-water basin, and district officials expect it to improve the overall quality of the local water supply. Residents seldom realize most of their imported water is also recycled, treated waste water, Snow said. The water district's selfdescribed "one-two punch" replenishment system would filter out particles, bacteria, salts, viruses and pesticides to turn the waste water into pure, clean water. The project could serve not only as a model for other and regions but as an aid to them as well. "By us being more self-sufficient here, it frees up more water supplies for other areas," Snow said. South-county residents, who use 100 percent imported water, will see no change in their water resources. The district's plans have attracted international attention, especially from desert nations such as Kuwait and growing nations such as China. A similar system with an above-ground reservoir is in place in San Diego, as well as smaller systems in Texas and Virginia. "The project seems pretty clear," said Charlie Lundberg, a Huntington Beach resident who attended the open house. "I hate to see all that water in the Santa Ana River go to waste." The districts will hold a public heating at 6 p.m. Tuesday at the water district headquarters, 10500 Ellis Ave., Fountain Valley. Copies of the recently released environmental impact report are available at http://www.ocregister.com/science/waterx02w.shtti l 12/7/98 Plan would turn waste water to drinking water Page a of 4 the headquarters and at libraries. Call (714) 378-3200 for more information. n nsxapepx m 0n UU*.gistur CapyrOpM 18aB TM Onnpe eoumy Repiatx pMw folk Oe.MNMb to oc�eeirter®link FaeEem.cem http://www.ocregister.com/science/waterxO2w.shtH 12/7/98 Purifying Waste Water for Home Use Proposed Page I of 4 fdeves ____WFG70J rte Index Go - t ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP WIN this way 11 f 1.or apartment rental u Monday, December 7, 1998 Purifying Waste Water for Home Use Proposed . Utilities: The $400-million project would supply North and Central County. Officials concede residents may be squeamish about the idea. By HARRISON SHEPPAR,Special to The Times n what officials say would be the largest project of its RELATED _kind in the world, water agencies are proposing to send highly purified waste water into the faucets of more than 2 O.C. SECTIONS million households in central and north Orange County. MAIN PAGE The proposed $400-million Groundwater Replenishment System would treat about 40% of the water that households NEWS BY flush down their drains--and that now is pumped to the ocean-- CONUALNITY so that it becomes as pure as bottled water, officials say. It then would be pumped into the ground water basin and eventually SPORTS withdrawn by water districts throughout north and central PREP SPORTS Orange County for household use. "This project will put [the waste water] through a treatment BUSINESS process which will turn it into the highest-quality water available in Orange County," said Thomas Dawes, who is SO CAL LIVING managing the project for the Orange County Water District and CALENDAR Orange County Sanitation District. Officials of the two districts acknowledge that residents CALENDAR could be squeamish about drinking water that used to be mixed WEEKEND with sewage. They will hold a public hearing Tuesday to explain HOME DEStGN the project and get public feedback, and they expect to vote on it in the spring. COMMENTARY District officials say the system is needed because of the county's rapid growth. Within 20 years, 800,000 new residents T.V. TIMES are expected in North and Central County alone, creating demand for almost 50 billion additional gallons of water a year. The water supplied by the project would be drawn out of the ground by districts spanning almost all of North and Central County, defined loosely as the area west of a line drawn from ADVERTISEMENT Yorba Linda to the western edge of Irvine. La Habra and Brea at the northern tip of the county are excluded because they are not part of the water district. I',� 1113 Without the project, the county would have to rely even littp://w v.metahollywood.com/HONffi/NEWS/ORANGE/t000111753.html 12/7/98 Purifying Waste Water for Home Use Proposed Page 2 of 4 more on water imported from the Colorado River and Northern California, sources that are more expensive and becoming increasingly restricted for environmental reasons, according to _ Ron Wildermuth, spokesman for the water district. "That would be higher-priced water, so water bills would go o'Sr up," Wildermuth said. "If there were a drought, there could be a wox _ real problem." The water treatment process would pay for itself in reduced water and energy costs, he said. While other water reclamation projects in the region have at times run into opposition from environmental and industry groups, this project has so far managed to steer clear of controversy. In the San Gabriel Valley, for example, the Miller Brewing Co. and a group of local residents fought hard two years ago against a water reclamation project that would have put the treated waste water into the company's beer, as well as sending it to other customers throughout the region. Opponents said the project provided inadequate protection for human health. Eventually the project was scaled down and modified, and located downstream of the brewery. Forest Tennant, a former West Covina mayor who formed a citizens group to fight the San Gabriel project, said if water officials had proposed using the same technology Orange County wants to use, he would have supported it. "That was the precise technology that we wanted them to use in the San Gabriel Valley, and they didn't want to do that," Tennant said. "That's what the issue was all about." With Orange County's technology, "it is very difficult for me to see how any viral particle or DNA particle would survive and be a threat to human existence," Tennant added. The Sierra Club, which has opposed a number of area water reclamation projects in the past, doesn't have any major objections to this project, said Bob Siebert, chairman of the Conservation Committee of the club's branch representing north and central Orange County. Although the group has yet to take a formal position on the project, Siebert said it appears beneficial--as long as the water quality is regularly monitored-- because it preserves water resources. Reed Royalty, president of the Orange County Taxpayers Assn., said he supports the project because it would not raise taxes or water rates. He also has no problem using water that at one time was considered sewage. "A lot of people say, No, I don't want to drink water that's been used before.'The fact is, every drop of water on Earth has been used before. We have the same amount of water we've had since the days of the cave man, I suppose." The project's environmental impact report is being reviewed by a number of government agencies. Kurt Berchtold, assistant to the head of the Regional Water littp://www.metahollywood.com/HONfE/NEWS/0RANGE/t0001 11753.html 12/7/98 Purifying Waste Water for Home Use Proposed Page 3 of 4 Quality Control Board, said the technologies to be used by the plant have proved effective. "Generally, our agency supports proper waste water reuse as long as it's done in a manner that protects both existing water quality and public health," Berchtold said. The system, which would be completed in stages from 2003 to 2020, would pump more than 32 billion gallons of purified water per year into the ground-water basin, which supplies about three-quarters of the tap water for northern and central Orange County. County officials hope to meet additional demand for water through conservation efforts such as distributing low-flush toilets and teaching efficient landscaping techniques, as well as importing more water. South County imports all of its water and is therefore not affected by the project, while North and Central County import about one-quarter of their supply. The technology used in the project is a relatively new combination of older techniques that has been used on a small scale in only a few communities throughout the country, according to county officials. Orange County would be taking a "leadership position" in the water industry by building this plant, said Dawes, the project manager. The new plant in Fountain Valley would use microfiltration and reverse osmosis--essentially a two-part filtering process-- and then sterilize the water with ultraviolet light. Minerals would be added back into the water to prevent concrete and iron in the pipes from leaching into it. The purified water would be pumped from the plant to a pipeline along the Santa Ana River and dumped into the Kraemer Miller Basin in Anaheim to seep into the ground. From there, it would take at least two years before the first of the treated water is pulled out for household use. Both microfiltration and reverse osmosis have been used in bottled water and in pharmaceuticals for years, but combining the two to produce clean tap water is a relatively new innovation, first used in 1992 by the Walt Disney Co. in Orlando, according to Wildermuth. Districts in Los Angeles County and Arizona have been using the technology for several years without major problems, but their plants process only a fraction of the amount of water that Orange County would. The techniques are so effective that officials believe they will eventually be able to desalinate ocean water cheaply. Desalination currently costs about four times as much as waste water to purify because of its high salt content. "It's a breakthrough industry that will probably become the standard in the dry, western parts of the United States in the next 10 to 20 years," Dawes said. A public hearing on the proposed project is scheduled for 6 littp://www.metahollywood.com/HONE/NEWS/OP,ANGE/t0001 I 1753.htm] 12/7/98 Purifying Waste Water for Home Use Proposed Pace 4 of 4 p.m. Tuesday at Orange County Water District headquarters, 10500 Ellis Ave., Fountain Valley. rrr From Your Drain to Your Faucet Orange County's water and sanitation districts are proposing a system that purifies treated wastewater to drinking water standards. The reclaimed water could supply 800,000 people a year in North and Central County. How it works: 1. Water leaves home through the sewer system. 2. It is pumped to a sanitation plant and treated to a level that makes it safe for oceans and streams. 3. Under the current method, treated water is piped to the ocean. 4. With the new system 40% of the water is instead filtered using microfiltration and reverse osmosis and sterilized by ultraviolet light. Minerals are added to prevent it from picking up iron and other minerals from the pipes. Chlorine is added as an extra disinfectant. 5. The clean water is pumped along the Santa Ana River to a holding basin in Anaheim. From there, it percolates into the ground water and spreads throughout north and central Orange County. Source: Orange County Water District Conyrieht 1998 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved Search the archives of the Las Angeles Times for similar stories about. WATER RECLAMATION, WATER TREATMENT PLANTS, WATER— ORANGE COUNTY, WATER DISTRICTS—ORANGE COUNTY. You will not be charged to look for stones,only to retrieve one. News co Site Index .o litip://www.metahollywood.conVliONE/NEWS/ORANGE/t0001 11753.html 12/7/98 OCREGISTER.COM: Columnists: Pagel of 3 MARKETPLACE Columnists et,omes ��m X Home Page .�. AutoAccess iNC OY4NG!COUHiY 11YCJff[1[ MSEET]A ocm9lste�.com ii+YLf� Outside Om,9.(aunty Nu lea ri.ic h Obllua rles L, wrJva clD:v _t Wr- From sewage pure water shall emerge December 9, 1998 = = It's not easy persuading people to drink water that used to be sewage. Let's face it: There's a pretty high yuck factor involved. True, the treated sewage water the Orange County Water District wants to put into municipal water systems actually will be more pure than the bottled water you pay $1.25 a quart for at the 7-Eleven. But when you hear about turning sewage into drinking water— "from your toilet to your tap," as the unsavory saying goes—the initial reaction is an unqualified "Yuck!" And even though you're pretty sure that the guys at the sewage treatment plant aren't simply taking raw sewage, straining it through a cheesecloth, sprinkling a little chlorine into it and then sending it straight to your kitchen tap, the idea of using former sewage in the coffee or the baby formula can make you a little queasy. It takes some effort to rid that water of its sewage stigma. "It's a challenge," says Ron Wildermuth, a spokesman http://www.ocregister.com/community/dillow.shtmi 12/8/98 OCREGISTER.COM: Columnists: Page 2 of 3 for the water district, which supplies water to most of north and central Orange County. "We've probably given a hundred talks to politicians, community groups, Rotary Clubs, you name it. When you explain the technology, they say OK." But Ron admits the yuck factor is there. In fact, the yuck factor is so strong that the sewage-into-drinking- water system the water district wants to build is actually far more elaborate than it really needs to be. Here's what I mean. As it now stands, sewage and other waste water in the Orange County Sanitation District is discharged into the ocean at the rate of about 245 million gallons a day. The former sewage water is actually already pretty clean when it leaves the treatment plant. Although it's not recommended, it wouldn't kill you to drink the stuff. But now the water district wants to save some of that water. So it's proposing a $400 million system that would take about 20 percent of the former waste water from the sewage treatment plant and squeeze it through a microfiltration and reverse osmosis system. After the water got through that, it would be as pure and crystal clear as any water on Earth. So if it's that clean,you'd think it could be put directly into your drinking-water pipes. And frankly, it could be. But there's that yuck factor; no matter how clean it is, people don't want to drink water that's too closely associated with a sewage treatment plant. So the water district plans to pump that hyper-purified water miles away from the Fountain Valley sewage treatment plant and into holding ponds on the Santa Ana River in Anaheim. Then it will seep down through the ground until it reaches the aquifer, the vast underground reservoir from which the water district draws its drinking water. http://www.ocregister.com/community/dillow.shtm] 1218/98 OCREGISTER.COM: Columnists: Page 3 of 3 A couple years or more later, the former sewer water, now mixed in with the aquifer water, finally will be pumped up and sent into people's homes. Sure, it's a long way to go to shed the sewage stigma. But it's probably necessary. So if the water district does decide to turn sewage into drinking water,we shouldn't worry. The water coming out of our taps will be miles and years and numerous filtration systems removed from its former sewage self. In fact, maybe we should remember that municipal drinking water is a little like sausage: If it tastes good, we should relax and enjoy it. And try not to think too much about how it was made. Gordon Dillow may be reached at(714)953-7953. ♦1 news W In omn,county.Caftnna �egistu,, Cop"ght I TM orange ewntY aegleter Please send oommems to ecreoisteaMIM keedmm http://www.ocregister.com/community/dillow.shtm] 12/8/98 Plan would turn waste water to drinking water Page 1 of 4 iL ' •r,;- Hoe mbe Page s.. m v Auto�Ac~ce!! ®..�_.. SNcnMwcr.COUN fREGIS" II ocr eg isber.com Plan would turn waste water to drinking water ENVIRONMENT: The liquid, now pumped to Teuhooroey&µuumuhnu sea, would be filtered and returned to the Uri.or Ndu,e ground to boost supply and keep rates our unbnua down. December 2, 1998 By OLIVIA HAWKINSON a�•,.,=. =OMER The Orange County Register "=?""•"" FOUNTAIN VALLEY —The skies were wet and gloomy Tuesday afternoon, but folks inside the Orange County Water District headquarters talked of drought and water shortage. Water officials and their neighbors from the Orange County Sanitation District held an open house to show off plans for the unique ground-water filtration system. The $400 million system would allow highly treated waste water to seep into the underground beds that hold much of Orange County's future supply of drinking water. The research for what would be the largest project of its kind in the nation has gone on for eight years, but water district officials want to rally county residents' support before the project comes to a vote in March. If approved by water district board members, final design will begin next year and the project's first phase will be completed in 2003. The filtration project could keep water costs down, ease water rationing during droughts, boost supplies for the county's rapidly growing population and make http://www.ocregister.com/science/waterx02w.shtmi 12/2/98 Plan would turn wastewater to drinking water Page 2 of 4 better use of waste water that now is pumped out to sea. The project would add enough water to the supply annually for about 800,000 people by 2020 —the expected population growth for that time frame. Now serving about 2.2 million people north of the El Toro "Y," the water district would continue to rely on imported water from Northern California and the Colorado River. The water district is the wholesale agency responsible for managing and protecting the ground-water basin serving 23 cities and water agencies in north and central Orange County. The sanitation district collects, treats and disposes waste water in those areas. Despite the rosy outlook, the board will not approve the plan without firm public support, said Michelle Tuchman, spokeswoman for the sanitation district. In a team effort, the districts have used newsletters, telephone surveys and public hearings to educate residents. "There's cactus growing not far from my house," Tuchman said. "It's a constant reminder this is a desert. We have to manage our water resources." Consultants, representatives from community groups such as the Rotary Club and a handful of local residents attended the open house in the water district's board room. Curious residents asked: How much is it going to cost? How will it affect my water rates? Is it safe? The project would be funded entirely by loans and grants to the districts, not by bond measures, said water district senior engineer Tama Snow. The districts have secured about $20 million in grants, $500,000 from the federal government and $790,000 from the California Energy Commission. Snow said the project will be kind to residents' wallets. http://www.ocregister.com/science/waterx02w.shtml 12/2/98 Plan would turn waste water to drinking water Page 3 of 4 "If we don't do the project, rates will go up," she said. "The project is rate-neutral. Our only water alternative is importing more water if it's available, or sea-water desalination. Both are very expensive." The quality of the system's water will exceed that of the Santa Ana River, which currently feeds the district's ground-water basin, and district officials expect it to improve the overall quality of the local water supply. Residents seldom realize most of their imported water is also recycled, treated waste water, Snow said. The water district's selfdescribed "one-two punch" replenishment system would filter out particles, bacteria, salts, viruses and pesticides to turn the waste water into pure, clean water. The project could serve not only as a model for other and regions but as an aid to them as well. "By us being more self-sufficient here, it frees up more water supplies for other areas," Snow said. South-county residents, who use 100 percent imported water, will see no change in their water resources. The district's plans have attracted international attention, especially from desert nations such as Kuwait and growing nations such as China. A similar system with an above-ground reservoir is in place in San Diego, as well as smaller systems in Texas and Virginia. "The project seems pretty clear," said Charlie Lundberg, a Huntington Beach resident who attended the open house. "I hate to see all that water in the Santa Ana River go to waste." The districts will hold a public hearing at 6 p.m. Tuesday at the water district headquarters, 10500 Ellis Ave., Fountain Valley. Copies of the recently released environmental impact report are available at http://www.ocregister.com/science/waterx02w.shtmi 12/2/98 Plan would turn waste water to drinking water Page 4 of 4 the headquarters and at libraries. Call (714) 378-3200 for more information. f1 nevrswper in Orange Canny.Couroxii, _. teyiSW " CopyripM IM TM Orange County Register Please sod!cemmenis to acreaister�l'nk heMam RECYCLING WASTE WATER " 1' oieaa g Orange County water officials want to channel treated wane wateriM V fa,ime,o underground g ^re ,C Ground-water water supplies.If approved in March,the tint phase of the project Would be fiver 4 t' isnin operational in 2003. oundary OClear and odorless waste �aatme di '�Wastewater. Wastewater. OUNtt water is rather"%dindmust �.,pgyamnt_.•, RO percent .! eul�'�J.n be treated to make it drink able, processed for - discharged into .f±�.'�)~ reuse. the sea. rested / e water The O.C.Water Oinrist wants to salvage some of the 245 million gallons of\; treat ad wane water e4 discharged into the ocean every day ©Miaofiltration 0 Treated water sent to holding removes larger pools and the Santa subnancessuchas Ana River bed. / viruses and bacteria. e,�,—•--.-..,,,a ©Reverse / i osmosis removes Particles I / ave,andt the ets rid Holtlin level and gets rid pool of the salty taste �y Pined wataris - War to the surface - and multl be treated with REVERSE WHAT? ©.Percolation purifies the chlorine before it shows up Here's how reverse osmosis works. watt,with the impurities in homes. filtering out in the porous cork. 1.Pressurized 2.Impurities It'it.aboutayearto percolate - - waste wa ter pumped trapped in down to the water table through membrane. membrane,leaving purified water. 3.Purified water Waste squeezed into pipe. water SIZE COMPARISON -" ",etherize of ale ...then avirus would Wand be the ",a the size ofa bathe size ofa would rithesize M Purified tennis ball... tractor trailer of Luxor in Las ens { water Vegas. Sourcei Oran County Water D str., •�I• GEORGE TURNEYrrhe Orange County Register http://www.ocregister.com/sciencetwaterxO2w.shtml 12/2/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Registers - Employees' health costs on the rise INSURANCE: Mergers of HMO companies from some IIaVe reduced ChOICeS communities, there is less com- petition—and HMOs have found and allowed HMOs to it easier to raise prices to try to raise premiums. Man restore profits. P S As businesses and organize. businesses are tions face sharply higher premi- I18SSinthe COSLS LO workers. irritate ums,many of them, reluctant to irritate workers in a tight labor By MILT FREUDENNEIM market, are sharing the in- The New York Times creases proportionately with their employees. Many working Americans will But others are asking employ pay R percent to 20 percent more ees to pay more outof-pocket for health insurance premiums charges or to pay larger percent. next year,the sharpest increases ages of the premium costs. since the early 1990s. Three thousand employees of The rises in premiums follow J.Baker Inc.,a retail shoe chain, several years of failed efforts by will pay 9 percent more in premi. health maintenance organiza- ums neat year,reflecting an av- tions and other managed-care erage 9.2 percent increase in the companies to stem growing med- company's overall premiums. ical costs. Outof-pocket charges toemploy- Chief among those increases ces for prescription drugs, ad- are the costs of prescription missions to hospitals and visits to drugs, advanced surgical de- doctors and emergency rooms vices and techniques, and mr- will also rise vices to patients outside hospi- Dorothy Finigan, benefits cols. Cost-cutting has also been manager at J. Baker, which is thwarted by legislation in a num. based in Canton,Mass.,said that bar of states that prevent HMOs without the added out-of-pocket ` from restricting patients'access charges, overall premiums for to specialists and diagnostic pro Elie company would have risen 20 cedures. percent. As costs climbed.health plans Ante[Corp.,a telecommunice- for a time had trouble raising tiom company based in Little rates significantly bemuse big Rock.Ark., will pay 9.6 percent employers and purchasing more, on average, z Ro health ' groups beat down their demands maintenance orgganizations, but and even, in some cases,forced the increases f A be much steep- am- them to swallow lower premi- er for many of se theal's company any ums. pays ones, because the rom each But now,after a wave of merg- pays only a set amount for each ers. acquisitions and departures Plane see INSURANCE Page 4 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # I Date I Subject Orange County Register INSURANCE: Soaring premiums hit small businesses hardest FROM I Riverdale Texaco in Morris Federal employees, whose are still in precarious financial employee. County.N.J.,will face an 11 per- health plan is the nation's larg. straits. Alltel Days about 80 percent of cent increase,to S720 a month,to est,will pay 7.4 percent more,on a llt monthly premium fora cover the owner, Sal Risalvalo, average,next year. The govern- "I was really surprised and family in an IIMO.The company and two full-lime employees. Ri- ment agreed to average in- shocked that the price increases is raising iyin its contribution for the salvato joined an HMO offered creases in premiums of 10.2 per- are coming through," said Wil- is a time in four years,by 4 per- by Aetna U.S. Healthcare when cent,the biggest since 1989, The liam McKeever, a health care cent, said Joe Meyer, manager his former insurer left the state. employees will pay only part of analyst at Paine Webber Securi- ce ,If we had taken a comparable the increase because the taxpay. ties,who added that the year 1999 of corporate benefit planning. Even so, some employees will policy, the increase would have ers are absorbing part of it. could he the"best since 1993"for been 20 percent," he said. Consolidated Edison employ- I HMO rofits. be pay 31 percent more, or $19.42 Even at the biggest compa- ees who are union members will D more each month. nies, the increases have jolted pay 8 percent to 9 percent more The HMO industry has benefit. Some medium-size employers corporate benefits executives, next year for llMOcoverage,un- in Florida with SW or 600 workers who fear a return to the fast-ris- der a three-year contract. Edwln ed from rapid consolidation, are getting killed," said Becky ing health costs of the late 1980s Ortiz,director of employee rate- which has left the surviving com- Clorida fleali Care the Central and early 1990s. tions for the company,said HM0 Danies in stronger positions.Six- Florida Ilealth Care Coalition, a Government economists say premiums paid by the company teen of the nation's 25 biggest group of large employers in Or- they expect that the upswing will were rising 5 percent to 13 per- HMOs were swallowed by other Inndu. Her members have three- continue over the next few years, cent,compared with 6 percent to managed care companies in the year HMO contracts with 3 per. adding hundreds of billions of 9 percent in 1998. last three years. cent annual Increases, but some dollars to national health spend- The California Public Employ- "There are only a few national midsize companies are facing 20 ing. Medical costs are now pro- ees Retirement System bar. carriers left: Aetna,Cigna,Unit- percent increases, she said. jetted by consultants to rise 6 gained rates down in each of the ed Healthcare," Finigan, of J. Costs are also shaTly higher t f l than t percen , more an three limes last Baker, said. Because the num- for small businesses, and same ncre. Now it has i hers so limited,they are calling giving up health ea fast as the annual rate of in0a- agreed to ncrease the shots." s averaging e are considering g lion. 7.3 percent for 900,000 members, benefits,which would add to the While Information on next including a 10.75 percent in- 43 million Americans who do not year's premiums is still being have insurance. crease for Keiser Permanents. Neil Caggiano, owner of the gathered, the trend is already The premium increases have Glen Head Flower Shop in the clear. Medical costs are up 6 per- been welcomed on Wall Street, Long Island community of Glen cent and HMO premiums are ris- where most health maintenance Ilead,N.Y.,with nine employees ing percent,according to a so, organizations have been out of 8 covered, is waiting for notice of Vey of So of the nation's largest favor with investors during sev- his 1999 rates, which take effect companies and 1,000 medium- era] years of small or nonexis- in February."if it goes up more, size employers by BT Alex tent profits.Indeed,by last year, we may not be able to offer it," Brown Inc., a Wall Street firm. most health maintenance organi- he said. zations were losing money, ac- cording to Inlerstudy, a man- aged-care research center in Minormnvdia. and many InIOs UIIlWll 1 UUgnCuS INaUU11 e H diet 1-011ULIUII JIW IU:11'Ua 1'SE.0 I U1 � ews co ie n ex �a ' 1 I A SECTION HELP✓ this way for apartment rental Friday, ecem er 4, 1998 Clinton Toughens Nation's Water Pollution Standards ■ Environment: Program takes aim at microbe blamed for 900 deaths annually. $870-million grant includes$80.8 million for California. By JAMES GERSTENZANG. Times Staff HIMer IEWPORT, R.I.--President Clinton unveiled some of the toughest water pollution standards in the nation's history 1IRMAThursday, with the goal of eliminating a deadly microbe from the nation's drinking water and reducing the hazardous noveaTisEmEr byproducts of disinfectants. After touring a water treatment plant, the president also announced the award of nearly $870 million in grants to help states make low-interest loans to communities to improve their ' drinking water treatment, including $80.8 million, the largest single grant, for California. "This is the sort of thing we ought to be doing in America. . 6ll�a V ���ir the president said. "It's a very important day." On a scenic overlook of Fort Adams State Park,while sailboats crossed Narragansett Bay behind him. Clinton also •.;.,.,::. ' used the speech to make the broader argument that the fight to restore the environment can bring economic benefits rather CNOk ' _I than damaging the economy. ".,. We have got to get over this idea that protecting our environment and the quality of our lives is somehow bad for the economy. It will be one of the cheap generators of high- wage jobs in the 21 st century." the president said, on a brisk yet unseasonably mild day along the New England seashore. The drinking water standards are intended to eliminate from tap water a minuscule microbial monster. known as cryptosporidium,that federal authorities estimate kills 900 people a year. The regulations also are intended to reduce the potentially long-range interactions--which studies now link to increased risk of cancer, reproductive disorders and developmental problems--when chlorine and other chemicals are introduced to water supplies to kill bacteria and other dangerous agents found in ground and surface waters. Sen. John H. Chafee. the Rhode Island Republican who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, has called the toughened standards "without question the most significant and expansive safe-drinking-water regulations in the history of the issue." But although the new regulations were praised as overdue and far-reaching improvements, they were also criticized as http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000110819.html 12/4/98 111JAWll lVUA;uCub ANYUUIIb t%YtCI YVUVUV11 JW11V,11W insufficiently lax in fighting the introduction of such chemicals as trihalomethanes,one of the byproducts that occurs when disinfectants interact with organic and inorganic materials in drinking water. "They're a good first step,but they don't go far enough," said Jane Houlihan, a senior analyst on the staff of the Environmental Working Group,a Washington-based research and public interest organization. In 1990,the Environmental Protection Agency's Science Advisory Board determined that exposure to bacteria,viruses and protozoa—among them giatdia and cryptosporidium—was most likely the greatest remaining health risk associated with drinking water supplies. In recent years,about 900,000 people annually have suffered the debilitating—and in some cases fatal—effects of drinking water contaminated With cryptosporidium. An outbreak in Milwaukee in 1993 has been blamed for as many as 104 deaths. The EPA has estimated that the cost of implementing new treatment plans among all but the smallest water treatment systems Will be$307 million and that,for more than 90%of those affected,the cost would mean increases of less than$1 in monthly water bills.The benefits,the agency predicted,would include savings of$263 million to $1.24 billion in costs associated With the waterbome illnesses. The White House estimates that the measures could prevent 460,000 illnesses each year. Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved IQ Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: BILL CLINTON,WATER.WATER POLLUTION,PUBLIC HEALTH, FEDERAL AID.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. FIFW_ �_ GO e 11 2X � http://"u�,.Iatimes,comfHOME/NEWSIASECTION/t000110819.html 12/4/98 sewage viant is rutauy netpurg to "mar ure tray rage i ut . ews Po i e n ex t 71 1 FRONT PAGE HELP) this way for apartment rental .... ues ay, December 8, 1998 Sewage Plant Is Finally Helping to Heal the Bay By BETTINA BOXALL, Times Staff Writer lt has taken years of court battles, environmental activism and more than$1 billion, but the waste water pumped J into Santa Monica Bay by the city of Los Angeles is finally as clean as it's supposed to be. ADVERTISEMENT The city's sprawling Hyperion sewage treatment plant is for y, the first time fully meeting pollution standards set 26 years ago by the federal government. C' The milestone, reached this month,highlights significant improvement in the health of the long-abused bay, thrust throughout this century into the conflicting roles of city playground and toilet. p Los Angeles coastal waters face ongoing pollution -" problems, but the river of city effluent piped into the Pacific is % i the cleanest it's ever been. `VIN " d�■ It's just such an incredibly momentous day for the bay," � rejoiced Mark Gold, executive director of Heal the Bay, an r� environmental group formed to force bay cleanup. "More than any other event I can think of, it's a reminder of how far the bay has come." Los Angeles arrived reluctantly at this point. For years after sweeping pollution standards were adopted in the 1972 federal Clean Water Act, the city argued--along with many others in California--that it should be exempt from the law's mandate to treat all ocean-bound waste water at the secondary level, biologically scrubbing it after most of the solids are removed in primary treatment. Orange County and San Diego won exemptions. But the federal Environmental Protection Agency eventually said no to Los Angeles and sued to force the city into compliance. In 1987, city officials waved a white flag,signing a consent decree in which they agreed to almost immediately stop dumping sewage sludge in the ocean and to meet the secondary standards by the end of 1998. They have done just that, and are on the verge of finishing a complicated and costly overhaul of the Hyperion complex that one sanitation official likened to open-heart surgery. "We've got a flagship of a plant," boasted Chris Westhoff, general counsel of the city Department of Public Works. "I can tell you everyone involved in it has a major sense of accomplishment. . . . A lot of us feel very, very good about having met the deadlines." http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/FRONT/t000112051.html 12/8/98 bewage Fiam is rmauy neipmg to neat me nay rugc: ui y The levels of suspended solids and a number of heavy metals discharged into the bay by Hyperion and the county Sanitation Districts' sewage treatment plant in Carson have declined dramatically since 1971. Hyperion actually started meeting the secondary standard for solids removal nine years ago,well ahead of the court schedule. That has improved water clarity in rite bay, while the end of sludge dumping more than a decade ago has allowed some bottom-dwelling marine life to return to what was essentially a dead zone seven miles offshore. City marine biologist John Dorsey said the area to which Hyperion's treated effluent is piped, five miles off shore,has also become more hospitable to sea life--to the point where it's not much different from the rest of the bay. Still,the good news on the sewage front is countered by another major pollution source that will make the massive Hyperion improvements look like an easy fix. Hyperion's upgrade"is a very large step forward," said attorney David Beckman of the Natural Resources Defense Council. "But it just strips away one set of problems,which still leaves a critical problem--that posed by storm water pollution." When It Rains,It Pours Urban runoff is now a greater source of some bay contaminants than treated waste water,according to the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project. Massive piles of trash flow into the bay from stone drains when it rains. And the project points to high bacteria levels in runoff as the primary cause of health risks to swimmers and surfers. Sediment contamination also persists in the bay, and additional sewage improvements are needed. The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts' Carson plant,which processes roughly the same amount of sewage as Hyperion, still treats some waste water at only the primary level.The districts have until the end of 2002 to upgrade to full secondary treatment under a consent decree reached after the EPA and environmental groups filed suit. Then there are the city's sewer pipes,which are old, leaky and too small. They overflow during heavy rains, such as last winter's El Nino downpours,sending raw sewage into storm drains and ultimately,the ocean. The city has spent more than$300 million upgrading the collection system and plans to spend $1 billion more in the next decade. The money is coming from $3.5 billion in bond issues approved by voters,signaling the degree to which an often tightfisted public has yearned for a cleaner bay. "If you went out to the average Joe on the street,they wanted treatment," said Michael Stenstrom,director of the UCLA Institute of the Environment. "And the folks running the agencies didn't want treatment. I think they lost some attachment to their constituency." However loath city leaders were in the past to embark on Hyperion's$1.2-billion make-over, they are now like proud parents,bragging about the results and planning a major http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWSIFRONT/t00011205I Jum1 12/8/98 Jewage rnaru is ruitmy nmpmg w nem we nay rage o uw r dedication ceremony next spring. Almost entirely rebuilt in a brightly efficient, high-tech style,Hyperion neither looks nor smells like the end of the line for roughly 370 million gallons a day of sewage. Packed into 144 acres just south of Los Angeles International Airport,the complex has commanding views of the ocean and a remarkably civilized scent. It is light-years away from the small plant opened on the site in 1925, when treatment consisted of screening out debris and pumping the raw sewage a mile into the bay. The resulting sewage plume closed beaches from Venice to Manhattan Beach in the late 1930s and'40s. In 1950 a new plant,advanced for its time and designed to treat at secondary levels,was opened. But the city population was growing so quickly that after less than a decade,more capacity was needed. The outfall pipe was moved to five miles offshore and primary treatment facilities were added, so that some of the sewage was given primary treatment and some secondary,a practice that endured until now. The recent reconstruction was complicated by the fact that Hyperion had to remain in full operation while old facilities were tom down and new ones built. The city could not exactly turn off the pipes. "It was a livingg nightmare," said John Crosse,who managed the plant from 1990 to 1997 and is now assistant director of the city Bureau of Sanitation. But one with a happy ending. Mission Accomplished The plant started sending all its flow through the secondary process the last week in November. As waste-eating bacteria in new tanks kick into full microbial gear, Crosse said the effluent is meeting full secondary standards for biochemical oxygen demand, and EPA officials say they expect the city to meet the Dec. 31 deadline. The treatment process involves steps as simple as screening out toilet paper and as complex as keeping bacteria munching away in air-free "digesters"that resemble giant industrial eggs. Another set of bacteria, which like air, is kept happy with pure oxygen created in an on-site cryogenic facility. The sludge left over from treatment--what used to be dumped in the ocean--is trucked to agricultural areas, where it is used to fertilize nonfood crops. As Hyperion has grown more sophisticated and high-tech this decade, its staff has shrunk to 500 workers and its annual operating budget has been cut by half,to $47 million. The rebuilding has not significantly added to the plant's capacity of 420 million gallons a day. When two final biological reactor modules come on-line early next year, Hyperion will be able to treat 450 million gallons a day. Crosse said that should be enough to handle the city's sewage until 2010, when further expansion may be necessary somewhere in the system, which also includes three smaller plants. Those facilities, in the Sepulveda Basin,near Griffith Park and on Terminal Island,treat at advanced tertiary or secondary levels. http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/FRONT/t000112051.html 12/8/98 sewage rutut is ruauq netpwg w new we on) t gc+w + . The Hyperion upgrade caps Crosse's career,and he is planning to retire next year. But before he does,he has one major task at the plant: He has been assigned to try to get the Navy's Blue Angels to do a Flyover at the dedication ceremony. Coavrieht 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: SANTA MONICA BAY,OCEAN POLLUTION,POLLUTION CONTROL,SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS HYPERION SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT,SEWAGE—DISPOSAL.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. ews _ GO _t__ ex ' GO http://w .latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/FRONT/t000112051.html 12/8/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register rl /a ,�n�y,e,< a' Doheny's waters closed through Sunday The orange County Register levels in the creek. The ocean at Doheny State Long said mainly surfers Beach is expected to remain would be affected by the closure, closed to surfers, swimmers and but because the waves were poor waders through Sunday because at Doheny and good elsewhere, Of high bacteria levels at the he doubted many people would mouth of San Juan Creek,which have been m the water if access empties into the ocean at the were allowed. beach. It was uncertain whether a sewage break had occurred up- stream. The beach itself remains open to the public. Lifeguard supervi. sor Steve Long said Doheny's waters are closed six to 10 times a year because of high bacteria WALL STREET JOURNAL/CALIFORNIA Low-Flow Toilets Bring Out a Torrent Of San Franciscans By Banana L.Moon Sla/1aPporl<r o)TIrt Wnu arn[RJOVPN« SAN FBANCISCO—Talk about a pre, gram flush with success. mile tourists make heelInesfar F7sher- man's Wharf and the Golden Gate Bridge, true San Franciscans have been lining up for areal anracllan:cheap toilets. For more than a year, the city Water Department has been offering ultra-low- now toiets(with 1.6-gallon tarka)for just $10.These toilets,wroth are required for an new construction in California and use 1.9 fewer gallons per Bush than the previ- ous standard,typically retail for$60 to$70. Boarding Sales The effort—pan of a program designed to cut the city's water usage and sewage treatment needs—has been a big sucoess: Sixteen on"ay sales (set up in parking boost have nearly all been sellouts.accord- ing to Kim Knox.a water-conservadon ad- ministrator.In all,she says,the city has sold 14.955 toilets since the program warted in the spring of 1997,including 2,361 lest month. James Fryer,water-conservation coo, dinator for the Merin Municipal WaterDis- tricl and a member of the California Urban Water Council,says the San Francisco ini- tiative is one of many low-flow Incentive programs around the stale. From 1995 to 1997,he says,such all"rebuffed in the replacement of more than 400.000 ware, chugging toilers. San Francisco officials haven't set their next sale. but will blanket the targeted area with notices and sign-up cards before It's time.Buyers can fill out the paperwork in advance.As part of the deal,they must agree to let an Inspector come into their home and make sure the toilet is installed. Isaac Wang, a financial analyst here who has picked up two toilets from the city, was drawn mainly by the potential sav- ings.On average,the city says,utility bills fall IN a year with the Installation of an of- ta-low-now toilet. Enjoying Ills Toilet Mr.Wang says he also liked the idea of conserving city water, mid he has found the toilets work well. "So far.' he says, "I've really enjoyed them." That's a rave review,considering the poor reputation that developed when low- now flushers were first mandated by the slate in the early bills for all new con. struction.Manufacturers bad Hills time to design those early models,Mr.Fryer says, so that many required two flushes instead of one,defeating I he conservation purpose. But Mr.Fryer says the models that fol. lowed work much better. "This time around," he says, "manufacturers had a lot of lead time to gear up,did a lot o1 re- search and analysis,and brought in all the rocketscienlism. k t theOpeniflof , Free market water could become California's next mother lode. by Dennis Pfaff i In the tpnng of I-Ni Chnwuc ..\I. Frahm.a tole pnca- 50 percencA kwkc•ern. f,rornis wed the rapt but inee thm noner whu chay. the Sara Divgn ('Dunn' W.vvr .Audtnnp'. Fnhmiagenq'h..Ive•n lookutg rilr aln•rn.trnx anvco. received a phone c.Ill iroununmonr tth,: had an tdea for ut- Working with mi :ntcrnmdi,im Fmluu met tath Ardon isfying the d,wicrl pcn•mual yuva to, oarcr. i\loom.then pn'.tticnr,,r Wcacrn Farnn.unl C.ittle C,v,which The caller.., limucr hn.vd nmmbc,I nc, water audu,rrtv. Imld water nehr. to —mm agwn: ,n r:. ,pr;rar and grazing had been npped Od th.0 a cm..ut LuLlh,ddcr it, nc, Ilupcnal land Althnuuh Frduu rn cat unnt. hvr r.:lk• ttuh .\Lmrc conut- Vtlley had rtehn n, .:¢mriomt agq,lm. I..un nc, ( t- uunl n:. m•nr :ncl..auu:.." rho% were ILitrr and nliehr be ...wroted ,I ne,kule : dvA n. hvlp •a .car : ..wnu '..vl. .L', a ❑u..b"w"tally Fhe pn,puul :utn4cd I'r.tluu.I Inrmp ,.Irnught ,rhr snit .L.wpc nit, '.t at tt I. „q•pi:c•I nw,u tin,:n t Am r,,,.I. b 1'191:1• tau 1 hvg„ h.ul hcru udd In pooch .upphvr' ill, \I It It 1puhta u \C.It It I):.m,I ,I NouiI t I t Aturwa ikn:awn S.m I..m, I.co rhv ,\Iva.tivu lhr, mm�l,ill ,anoun,6l hctw be a.nue h.:. Iluh I •ur::.I' FOR YOUR INFORMATION From: Lindell L. Mersh -. _ 9• "This is. Western Farms was the Owens Valley debacle."inch turned rich farmland l ono ,, the first deal'. owned by the Bass broth- dust bowl,California growers have bitterly opposed (alkwcmm e . of Fort Worth.Texas, even marginal acreage to benefit the cities. of its kincl who control a nluln- "Tire is the first deal of sit kind invoking Large quannar,.. involving large billion-dollar real estate water with a market appmach:'ssys John P Carter,chief counsel fortune.The Basses began to the IID."It's high stakes:'Underscoring that point.Gov.pet, quantities of water) buying Imperial Valley Wilson and state Sen. Steve Peace (D-EI Cajon)—both from with a market farmland about the same San Diego Counry­scaled the agreement on the last claw of the approach:' time as San Diego's 1998 legislative session by pushing through a S235 million drought. By the mid- appropriations bill.The measure will pay for water storage along 1990s their land qualified the mute to San Diego and for lining the canal with cement. for more than 200,000 thereby,saving some 300.000 acre-feet of water that would oth- acre-feet of water a year erwise be lost in tnrisit.Peace claimed the pmjea represented a i from the Imperial Irri- "fundamental shift"in the way California regarded water. gation District (IID). "People are starting to look at water as an asset ... [that] this That much water would swB has economic value:'says Swart Somach,a veteran water supply about one-third lawyer with Saaamentos De Cuir A Somach who has written of San Diego's annual extensively on private water marketing. Somach believes a consumption. commodities-type market holds the most promise,allowing for According to docu- relatively shon-term sales or leases a needs arse.Although he ments obtained this doubts that government bureaucnu and ranchers will ever per- summer by the Wall mit a pure free market in water,he is encouraged by the recent Street Journal, Western attendon of entrepreneurs. Farms offered to make "You're seeing the big dollars come in; people who do its water available at have saying power:'Somach says.People like the Basses,who prices aS much as 40 percent lower than what San Diego have reinvested their holdings in California but have not gone had been paying the Met.The proposed deal supposedly away.People like the shareholders of Cadiz Inc.,which owe could be done without the consent of any water or irriga- more than 57.000 acres in Central and Southern California. tion district.And the transfer promised to be enormously Cadiz plans to store surplus water in its aquifer system during profitable: Imperial Valley farmers paid $12.50 an acre-foot wet wean and transfer groundwater to the Met during dry for water that San Diego might buy for as much as$400 an years.The company has even gone to court to prevent a acre-foot.The Basses stood to capture the price difference garbage dump from locating near is property for fear it could on what amounted to a huge arbitrage deal. pollute the holding aquifers. 'We're a nationally traded After reviewing the documents.Frahm acknowledges that company, and water is San Diego—aware of the huge price differential—brle0y "The Kremlins our focus:' Cadiz CEO considered cutting out the middleman."Was there an idea of California, Keith Brackpool cold an about landowners entering into an agreement (directly with Investment newsletter in San Diego]?Yeah, that was an idea going around at that allocate water January. "We feel chat time:'Frahm says. She adds that the district even considered in inefficient and "ater-based assets will buying land and water rights itself. as the Los Angeles increase substantially in Department of Water and Posver had done in the notorious environmentally. value over time:, Owen,Valley land grab of the 1931k."When we were talking destructive The flurry of activist' to Western Farnrs, the first thought we had was.'If Western ways:' has demonstrated some- Farnrs can buy the In1J,vvhp emir wr?'-Frahm says thing else: Very itch V thin months,however, Frahm', talks with Moore fell and powerful plat- apart. San Diego discovered that W'cstern Farms' water ers, including some rights actually were held in cent by the IID—which of cc- environmentalists, are -' tively cut the Basses out of the deal.That discovery set up a sensing that after years series of confrnnution, hrncrrn the IID, the county of of talk. California is San Dsago. and th, .Ntet o%er pricing and transfer issues. getting serious about But with th, help of n,v&itor,,the liacnous parties signed putting wirer on the historic agrv,umnn tht, yvmg .Ind sununer. Starting in open market lust 151� about 211,i' .Iod , nu ulume for lu cave,, up to 21111JII III years after the guW acre-I.vI ,I( A......1'. ss.iicl will Rosa annually front rush, the market pro- the h,iI,mA \'.,Ile, Ise 1.In Ip,,gu La 52rd1 .In acre-foot mg of water nsulJ wall Ihr pl'o., o,srl n, the uurkoi taro. usher In a wnnod. ecru The kit .nH qn mew cal-Ihr Jell o, cumvrv.rtusn. which richer boom flat woul,l will pot w 11.11" ,Lsmo,n 111 ,.q,un'r .nsJ <hqs excess sapplin du,tically change floc wuN wt oho ul land out of producron. Ever once ,Hire West. aF L rAAt 141. � M. ` tea,_.. - .�� -: :r Acr,•' iq ` \ +It ��_• � 4. �'y��+�'�J. ice. •+yn. f` _ so Y S Rln 1 ,rWl•�u� ) 1 _ y�' alitimuo: water delivery system s<wnttilb. conaso of cws+ Vill.inju'r rrun.us concern is that rural communiov, di huge concrete slam-and-canal complexes chat collect and could disappear n the big growers sell then seater ngim 1. A came water from the northern Sierra Nevada and ems•.."Thc question we pow to the environmentalists. is the 1` Cascade Ranges to the Central Valle% and Southern if private parrs control the land and water even though i h- California.A third ditch system brings Colorado River war developed at public expense.what happens to the peopl, tc water from the aar.The massive public works proyecq largely who live and work thcmr'he asks."Who in this communm A completed in the middle third of the century and paid for by ever met a Bass bmthcr" ar ace and federal taxpayers,distribute their cheap water through Despite the fear of fallowing,however,efforts to introduce I us a hodgepodge system of 800 to 1.000 public water and imp- public policy considerations to water transfers have made tion districts.About 80 percent of the water they deliver is steady progress. In 1986, for instance. a California court of ce used for irngaton. appeal held that because the sure water board may determine to Over time,however,economists,urban planners,and emi- what is a -reasonable me" of water, it is free to modJy an% re` ronmentalists realized that Else inexpensive water concealed right based on what"is essentially a policy judgment requiring et enormous cos¢ and risks. For instance,huge numbers of fish a balancing of the competing public mcemsts: United Start v ss rt arc blocked from critical spawning beds by dams or arc Smr Naar i2esouno Coum+l Bel.(1986) 182 CA3d 82,130. :h sucked into the pumps used to divert water south from the In 1992 Congress passed the Central Valley Project Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. In addition,population pees- Improverriene Act.a bill supported by both Graff and Rosen- kic rer su and competition from other Western stares have caused berg.Among the bills primary goals was to restore massive the Colorado River to be overdrawn during years of drought. amounts of water to California's streams.But it included a pro- New comtmction of dams and pipelines.however, has been vision permitting users of Central Valley Project (CVP) water s� ila' scaled for both financial and environmental rcasom. to sell their allocations to buyers outside the projects service tar: Fbting this situation, many now argue,meam fundunen- corridor.thus opening the door to market-based transfers. in, tally changing the old central planting model that ronrols According to Tom Birmingham, a water lawyer at Sac- Bs the water delivery system.In other words,what is needed is a rimento's Kronick,Moskovitz,Tiedemairn&Girard,the hope- Pit dose of free enterprise.Among chose who share that percep- rus for market pricing"began to develop when it became th lion is Tom Grad,a senior anorney with the Oakland-based evident that water traditionally used for agriculttral,municipal, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), who advocates using and industrial purposes wotdd be rededicated to the environ- fOi market-based solutions to emironmend problems. ment:'Birmingham says the California Supreme Court deci- Graff says the price of water collected and delivered sion in National Audubon Soc'y v Superior Court (1983) through the sures aqueducts is"a gross undenaluation of the 33 CM 419 reinforced resource"that creates mote problems than itsolves. He eon- "The Basses) such thinking by "con- m' tends that subsidized prices,among other things,provide little On[ lit vincing lawyers that water w' incrntive to conserve water suppLes.Wasting irrigation water, $ , nigh¢ were rim as secure er he says, only encourages pressure to build more dams that involved ink as they had assumed:'The ac` .Imady have caused the near extinction of ocean-run salmon Audubon case held that el ttansattions and s[eelhead species. the sate had a dory ender tit -You can make capitalism work for the public interest if if they don't the public rust doctrine m you get serious about making it happen:'God says."We've understand the to allocate water resources at. had a socialist system for the put 100 years [where) you have in the public interest N, derails:' the Kremlins of California allocating water in wars that are wherever possible. economically inefficient and emironmenolly destructive'. It. Economic growth far is a position that"puts us on the side of the billionaires:'Graff factors also were entering an acknowledges,with just a hint of sheepishness. the equation. Cannon Di Indeed on this issue the EDF counts among its friends says BofA, for instance, so' retired Bank of America (BofA) chairman Richard was upset by proposals h1 Rosenberg.BofA,with a huge portfolio of agricultural loam. circulated during the fe has been inseparable from state agricultural policy for decades. drought years of the m' Fred Cannon,an executer vice president of BofA,says."I'm 1990s to rim water allo- Bi an economist by training, and most economists who have cations to urban areas, in looked at the water situation in California think it's screaming including Silicon Valley. Pr out for market reforms' by as much as 25 per- .a Ell' A coalition of big business and environmentalists,however. cent."Anything this puts su' nukes some Centel Vallev resider¢ deeply suspmous."As I the Califorma economy s fir see it.the environmental have jumped into bed with the at risk pun BofA a risk:' urban development community in hopes there will be a Cannon says. D trickle of water left after the construction is done:'says Ilan Despite thew pre m xsum.Calduras water d¢tncts, irriga- R Villarejo. executive director of the nonprofit California non district,.and water agencies—known as-the water buf- Ima ate for Rund Studio in Davis."I dons think paving over falocs"—weren't about to concede power. David Guys California is going to help the environment" a lawyer to, the C.duhrnu Farm liurcau, says mum, of the w NOrl nblt �� UII n. , .,.y.• �ww•�u districts opposed market reforms in the CVP Improvement of thinking [market pricing) is all you have to do:'Kennedy Act because they "dolt feel they need anything new." In says."We think chores about ten other things you have to do:' r 1993, tar example, the Central California Irrigation District including.he says,constructing new pipelines,aqueducts,and, helped sabotage a proposed sale of 32,00) acre-feet of water possibly.additional reservoirs, to the Met From a San Joaquin Valley dairy farm owned by Ultimately the Met and San Diego agreed to sidestep the Assemblyman Rusty Areus. Neighboring growers were "wheeling' issue—analogous to electric power transfers—by uiuid of Fallowing.as well as the possibility that Arenas might considering the deal to be rseo separate transactions. Under increase pumping from shared groundwater supplies. the agreement San Diego will acquire the conserved water A dismayed Graff watched helplessly as the badly bungled each year from the IID and mnsfer the supplies to the Met. effort Fell apart.He criticized the Met s"imardulnesi'in trying In exchange,the Met will deliver a like amount of water from arc to make a deal "with a high-profile politician running for its sources as San Diego. For in troubles the Met initially will os reelection"and then fading to make assurances about such a charge S90 an acre-foot. n¢ critical issue a gmundwater.Grad also blames a lack of lead- When all the pieces were apparently in place,one last player ership by both state and federal water officials."You really challenged the deal. In September the Coachella Valley Water have to make this a higher-profile concern:'he says. District—the IID's neighbor and lot in line for Colorado :a In May 1996 a coalition of business and agricultural lead- River water—threatened to block the transfer unless it �- ers did just that. Representatives from the state's Business received previously promised surpluses. Rellecting the impor- le Roundtable, Chamber of Commerce, Farm Bureau Feden- Lance of the IID-Met-San Diego pact. Secretary of the lion,and the California Manufacturers Association delivered to Interior Bruce Babbitt threatened to intervene in the dispute yr the state Legislature the Model Water Transfer Act for Califor- unless the parties could agree on a compromise. e =The document was supposed to serve as a basis for develop- ing and regulating a system of short-term,free-market truufers. he Bass brothers,who were chinking of some very large Bur despite the extraordinary economic clout behind the pro- Tout numbers when Moore first sat down wish Frahm,may posal,the act failed to produce the anticipated reforms.Puttinghave asked themselves in the put few monde why they the best face on the joint proposal, Cannon says,"What weever wanted to come to California.After they were cut think a impotent is that the urban business community cane of the action in 1995,some people began to wonder together with agriculture on what the rules should be:' if the Bass boys knew what they had gotten into. During this time San Diego's water authority was engaged Others close to the San Diego deal, however,dismiss any in marathon negotiations with Imperial Valley.The break- implication that the Bores had overlooked such basic infor- through proved to be "finding" excess water through new mation as who controlled the water rights to their land. methods of conservation rather dun fallowing land.The IID "They are very experienced and well-regarded business- would coax—in other words,pay—its participating landown- people:'says Steve Merksamer, a partner with Sacramento's ern to save water while they continue to urigtm thousands of Nielsen,Merksamer, Parrinello,Mueller & Naylor who rep- acres of lettuce,melons,asparagus,and Future.That won't be resents the Basses."They do not get involved in transactions; easy, possibly requiring a pumping system to capture irriga- where they do not understand all the details:' lion water for use a second or third time.Coss for installing The Basses sill may nuke money in Californias incipient and operating such a system could approach$700 to$900 per water market.In 1997 they sold their Imperial Valley land and acre, says IID's attorney Carter. San Diego's water payments interests in Texas for 8 million shares of U.S.Filter,a publicly world have to cover shore expenses. traded company in Palm Desert that manufactures water The deal,however,also had to mollify die politically power- treatment and tilmtion equipment.Among other holdings, ful Met,which wholesales some 2 million acre-feet of water the company owns Culligan, a manufacreirer of water III=- annually to 16 million people in Southern California. San ion systems.The Basel stock,valued at more than$352 mil- Diego was also the Mecs biggest customer, providing it with lion at its peak, represents a tidy profit on a real estate some 5200 million a year m revenue.Entering the deal late,the purchase chat originally cost less than$100 million. :Met used is control of the Ad-Amencan Canal to exact a vans- However. U.S. Filter has bigger plans. Moore, the former mr fee. It pmposed charging up to $262 an acre-Foot—mom president of Western Farms,sits on its board of directors along dun San Diego was odtiong to pay the IID—to use in canal. with former Vice President Dam Quayle.According to com- Bmcr negotiations on that issue dragged on for two years.Early pany spokespeople, U.S. Filter expects to receive compen- in 1998 a San Francisco judge ruled agunst the Men which sation for the water it conserves in the Imperial Valley for promptly appealed the decision.The L-Aniveles Timer reported transfer to San Diego.Coincidentally, U.S. Filter his invented that the conflict occasionally"rook on soma elements of farce:' new technology for recycling and purifying irrigation water such as the revelation that the Met had paid a public relations that may be essential for the success of future mnsfers. firm more than 5250,0)) to generate bad publicity about San "What we arc trying to do is help III) figure out how it Diego and its supposed.dlies.the Bus brothers. can .ell water to the city ... and have no less water for firm- Finally.George Dunn.Governor Wdson's chief .of ruff.and mg:'says Mum Jewett,a senior vice president of U.S. Filter. David Kennedv,the director o(the slice 1)ep.urment of Water Echoing a sentiment tut may become the mantra of water liesources, stepped in ear rave the deal. ironically. Kennedy policy analyst, in the 21st century.jessen says the district and isn't an advocate of market pricing as .i cure-all fair the sutei as tanners an,"going to have a little bit of cake, and they're w iter problan.,"I think some people base tillers into the trap going m c.u.t little of n.ono" O Tappan, Jean From: Miles, Patrick Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 1998 11:05 AM To: EMT;Y2K Steering Committee Cc: Information Technology Subject: U.S. raises estimate for fixing bug U.S. raises estimate for fixing bug WASHINGTON, Dec. 8—Ridding U.S.federal agency computers of the dreaded millennium bug will cost$6.4 billion, up nearly 19%from a$5.4 billion estimate made three months ago, the Clinton administration on Tuesday said. So far,61 percent of the government's most critical computer systems have been repaired or replaced so they can properly process dates after Dec. 31, 1999, up from 50 percent three months ago. THE DEPARTMENTS OF DEFENSE, Energy, State,Transportation, and Health and Human Services along with the Agency for International Development continue to lag in their preparations, however.The Education Department,which had been considered a significant laggard three months ago, is now making adequate progress, the administration reported. The administration's quarterly report said the increased cost estimate was expected and included in the government's 1999 budget. Patrick B.Miles Director of Infmrnation Technology Orange County sensation DRAW (714)593-7280 (714)219-3112 Pager Dmilest@orsd.com News Release Page l of 3 SuEcomeetee w Government Management, Information, and Technology Home ) News Release Jurisdiction Members For Immediate Release Contact:Malthew Ebert(102) 225-5147 Hearings ) November13, 1998 Schedule HORN RELEASES LAST SET OF Y2K GRADES FOR 1998: Press EXECUTIVE BRANCH MERITS AN OVERALL "13" Year 2000 WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Representative Stephen Horn, R-CA, Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Government Management, Information,and Technology,today released the last set of grades for 1998 on the Federal Government's progress toward solving the Year 2000 computer problem. Mr. Horn made the following statement upon releasing the grades: "In a little over 400 days,America and the world will come to terms with a problem of our own making. The problem is described in various ways—the Year 2000 problem, the millennium bug,the"Y21C"problem. Simply put, programmers in the 1960s and 1970s, saved limited expensive computer memory space by abbreviating the year, listing just the last two digits of the year. For example, using "67" instead of"1967" When the year 2000 arrives, unless corrected, some computers will assume"00"represents the year 1900 not the year 2000. Uncorrected computer systems may not know how to resolve this apparent return to the past. "As chairman of the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information, and Technology of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, 1, along with members of the subcommittee,have investigated how the Federal Government's computers are being prepared to avoid the Year 2000 problem. This review began during the 104d'Congress. We have been joined in this effort by the House Committee on Science's Subcommittee on Technology,chaired by my colleague, Mrs. Morella of Maryland. Along with other committees in the House of Representatives,we have spent a great deal of time assessing the status of public and private efforts to fix the Year 2000 problem. "It is in this context that I am releasing the sixth (61h) Report Card which reports the progress of the largest Federal Government departments and agencies' efforts to avoid year 2000 problems in the computer systems and embedded chips that relate to the agency mission. "The grades are based on agency information provided to the subcommittee's staff, on November 13, 1998, addressing the status of the agencies' most important, that is,their mission critical systems. These are the computers which the agencies have determined must be fixed in order for that Federal http:/hvww.house.gov/refomVemit/v2FJ981123.htm 11/24/98 News Release Page 2 of 3 department to perform its key duties. As you can see on the"Year 2000 Progress"chart,the picture is a gloomy one. "Overall, the Executive Branch of the Federal Government has earned a 'D.' Unfortunately,the Federal Government has not made enough progress since the last report card when it also received a 'D.' Executive Branch departments and agencies are responding too slowly in assessing and repairing their mission-critical systems, their telecommunications equipment, their embedded chip systems, and their data exchanges. This includes their interaction with other Federal agencies or the clients they serve be they States, localities,or non-governmental sources. More important,over one-half of the agencies have not completed contingency plans to ensure that service will continue should their mission critical systems fail. "We estimate, at the current rate of progress, that nearly one-third of the Federal Government's mission critical systems will not be Year 2000 compliant by the deadline established by the President of March 30, 1999. Federal systems need to be updated by this deadline to ensure sufficient testing of multiple systems. This deadline cannot be extended. "Several agencies "earned" grades that are especially discouraging.The Department of Health and Human Services, an agency that has been on this subcommittee's"Watch List" for some time, has again received an 'F.' Health and Human Services' Health Care Financing Administration,called by many "HCFA",the entity that administers the Medicare program, is mainly responsible for the failing grade.HCFA has over 100 mission critical systems and only 7 are Year 2000 compliant. If HCFA does not accelerate its efforts dramatically, failure of Medicare's systems is inevitable and thus the ability to provide payments for benefits and services will be jeopardized. "The Department of Energy's failing grade is another source of deep anxiety. Who wants an 'F' student managing nuclear material,as well as the clean-up of hazardous waste? "In addition, Energy has a key function in monitoring the production and distribution of electrical power to the citizens of the United States. Potential electrical blackouts could cost billions of dollars a day. Thousands of workers could be laid off. That would be a critical blow to an otherwise growing economy. "Departments that continually fail include the Department of Justice and the Department of State. In addition,I remain deeply concerned about the Department of Defense's 'D' minus grade. While I am encouraged by the leadership of Secretary Cohen and Deputy Secretary Harare,the Defense Department must focus on its embedded chip problem as well as its strategic systems. It goes without saying that there is zero tolerance for error when you are dealing with the defense of our Nation. "At the other end of the spectrum, the Small Business Administration has the notable distinction of being the first agency to report having one hundred http://www.house.gov/refonn/gmitty2k/981123.htm 11/24/98 News Release Page 3 of 3 percent(1000%)of its mission critical systems Year 2000 compliant. SBA can now focus on strengthening the status of its contingency planning and data exchange activities. In addition,the Social Security Administration has continued to improve its Y2K status. Social Security has been ahead of the curve since the start. It began working on the problem in 1989,eight(8)years before most departments and agencies began to awaken. Social Security is scheduled to be 100 percent(1000/9)compliant by the March 30, 1999 deadline and has a strong contingency planning process. "The Year 2000 problem has become more and more visible as the media continues to present this issue to the public in an informative and,in most cases, non-alarmist manner. However,the Year 2000 computer problem is 44.t receiving the attention it deserves from the President. It is essential that the President begin to address the Year 2000 issue much more frequently. President Clinton and Vice President Gore cannot continue to act as if this problem is going to solve itself. I have advocated the use of fireside chats from the White House. I continue to encourage the President,the Vice President,and the Assistant to the President John Koskinen,chairman of the Year 2000 Council,to redouble their efforts to address this issue.Time is naming out." "M I Juri"I.ft I Rharnbarm I Hearin s I schedule I P43t I Year 2000 B-373 Rayburn lloun OOim Building,Washington DC 20515 Tel.120 21 225 5147 Fax.12021 225 2373 http://www.house.gov/reform/gmit/y2k/981123.htm 11/24/98 YEAR 2000 PROGRESS Agency Grade Distribution REPORT CARD ro 9 s m a c I a 5 s YEAR 2000 rain ` � 3 z "r^( " z PROGRESS A B C D F Grades for Federal Department and Agency Grades For November 13, 1998 Federal Departments and Agencies Please sign your report card and have your department or agency head sign to designate awareness of your progress this grading period: Overall Grade : D Department or Agency Chief Information Officer Department or Agency Head Naparad for Suboommlera Chairman Stapban Nmn November H,1998 Suacomminee on G..rmmem Manayemnm.Inlonnallon,and Tarhnol.,, YEAR 2000 PROGRESS REPORT CARD 98 98 98 98 2000 98 98 98 98 2000 Feb 15 May 15 August 1 Nov 13 Final Eater, Feb 15 May 15 Aug 15 Nov 13 final Eaa SBA OPM Small Business Administration B B A A Office of Personnel Management B C- D C' SSA Education Social Security Administration A A+ A A Department of Education F D F C- NSF A A A A NRC C- B D C- Nalienal Science Foundation en Nuclear Regulatory Commission EPA DOT EW,onmenbd Protection Agency B F B B+ Department of Transportation F F D D DOD General Services Adminlstralian C A- B+ B+ Department of Defense F D D D- Interior C- C- D B Department of the Interior FEMA Justice Federal Emergency Management Agency D- A- B- B Department of Justice C- D F F Commerce DOE Department of Commerce B B B B Department of Energy D F F F VA Department of Veterans Affairs A C B- B- Dept of Health and Human Services D F F F State F F F F Department of Sale AID National NASA Aeronautics and Space Admin D B C+ C+ I Agency for International Development D- F F F HUD Dept of Housing and Urban Development B C C C Labor Administration Overall Department of labor F C D C Federal Departments and Agencies D- F D D Agriculture g D C C Department of Agriculture Prepared for subcommittee Clubman shaman Hmn.subcomminee on Government Management, Treasury ^ D+ leIRmn-tidn,and TKhoolosy. Issued November aa,lage baaad on al data hom Noeember 13, D Department of the Treasury U C INS. S=sominee Nome Pass on Ise tnlmroh hftp1 w.houae.gwl.Iamvgmlt YEAR 2000 PROGRESS Federal Departments and Agencies ve AGENCY SELF-REPORTED MISSION-CRITICAL SYSTEMS ADDITIONAL CRITERIA DATA FOR LAST 3 MONTH Tod bymand -Estimwed °Estimated Contingency Telecom. Embedded Eamittal S3'� November 13, 1998 Compliant as Compliant by Year 1= plats mastication Systems Dec. GRADE of Nov D March 1999 Compliant: systems Exchange SBA 42 100% 1110% 1998 IF IP IP - A s..11 ea. ess adavensian SSA n 308 99% 100% 1999 + IF IF IP A Saaal Secmh Admanetad. NSwsd mm Fm aaam SF 17 88% 100% 1999 + IP - IF A EPA 58 90% 97% 1999 - IP IP - B+ Enmarvmnul wmenm Atentv GSA Gm0lal semcm Aamnnwlim 58 88% 96% 1999 + IP IP + B+ Interior 92 82% 94% 1999 + IP - - B t eaanmm mn tatimi pr FEMA 46 85% 93% 1999 IF + + IF B FNeT Eme,aemy Mpml ApencY Comtmmercmmm,m 458 80% 91% 1999 IF IF IP + B VA 319 72% 85% 1999 IP IF IP + B- pe mentor Vmemre Aeaev NASA 157 76% 83% 1999 IF IP IP IF C+ Nedems"i advllneeds.e 1Mmm HUD 62 73% 83% 1999 + IF IF IF C Wat m Wand,and union pevNapnent Labor 61 67% 78% 1999 + IF IP IP C oe nmml mtaha, Agriculture 362 65% 76% 1999 + IF IF IF C bemnmemal Aencaawe Treaamemmla.Tm.wn 323 63% 73% 1999 IF IF IF IP C OPM 109 61% 70% 2000 + IF + IF C- created dammed mi nepemml Education 14 64% 69% 2000 + IF IF C- oepmmemerEctei IF NRC 7 57% 69% 1999 + + IP + C. xvaae.aewninyemmamm DOT 613 51% 61% 2000 IP IP IP IF, D CapNnMlNTmnspMellm DOD 2581 52% 59% 2000 IF IP - IF D- on nmadmpelanee Justice 223 54% 59% 2001 IP IF IF F peas .mmJmam DOE 420 50% 55% 2001 IF IF IF F nm pesuemel EnepY HHS 300 49% 54% 2001 + IP IP oemm Heanianam,manaenna IP F Mtate atmrenlmenm 59 36% 36% 2030 IP IF IF IF F AID 7 14% 15% 2023 IF IP Adhaa Y'ar intensional condemned IP F TOTAL 6696 61% 69% al omeamenn.Apemee D 'All progress,calculations,and estimates are based on subcommittee stairs analysis of agency self+eponed data. The R4mNad percentage of miadon<liwl cysteme done by March 1999 OMB deadline u a subcommittee mlimale beaed on agency rme of progre.. AdditonH Cdada are mtad'plui if the agency is noadng cmnplelian decampumial the task:mtoo'nagetive'if the agency ie significantly behind; dr•IP'II the task is in pmpre.s. Prepared for subcommittee Chapman Stephen Harn Issued November 23,1991 based on agency data As 01 November 13,109 subcommittee on Government Management Information,and Technology Internet:hap:rMww.housegaerrahmm it McIntyre, Donald From: Miles, Patrick Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 1998 12:18 PM To: EMT; Y2K Steering Committee Cc: Information Technology Subject: Federal Y2k Update Below is an excerpt from the Federal Government's Y2k status report released yesterday(11123).The full text can be found at httb:/Av .house.Dov/refoml/amit/v2k/981123.htm. You can also view the overall report card by clicking the "Year 2000"tab on the link above and then selecting the"YEAR 20DO PROGRESS-GRADE CARD AND CHART° option. 'The Department of Energy's failing grade is another source of deep anxiety.Who wants an student managing nuclear material, as well as the clean-up of hazardous waste? "In addition, Energy has a key function in monitoring the production and distribution of electrical power to the citizens of the United States. Potential electrical blackouts could cost billions of dollars a day. Thousands of workers could be laid off. That would be a critical blow to an otherwise growing economy.' Thanks, Patrick B. Miles Director of Information Techmbgy Orange county saturation DisaiR (714)593-72W (714)2193112 Pager pmiles@ocsd corn t Millennium Bu ed. Mr.Lea's year 2000 problem is overkill: He has been deluged all year with letters end questionnaires overreacting, in his The BigY2KProblem opinion,to predictions of computer haam. 'This year 20 W stuff Is waayyyy overdone:' Is the Silly Questions he says.'It's complete.template lunacy." Not all of his colleagues have reacted • quite so strongly, though many say they Dan Lee of Mirage Resorts Inc. are searching for solutions to the paper- work glut.Glenn Schaeffer,president and Is Sick of All the Queries chief financial officer of Circus Circus En terprises Inc., anomer Las Vegas gam About Whether Hai Ready, bling company, says his staff has been swamped with form letters for me past six months or So."The anxiety level as we get By CwgsrmA BwmsY closer to the date is getting higher." he Stan epa.n.of iam w—SLa xa— says.Mr.Schaeffer sends a form letter re, Dan Lee, a soft-spoken former Wall sparse to the form letter requests. Street analyst and weekend pilot.isn't gem The madness started in earnest last erally,given In flights of fancy. spring.Mr.Lee says,when federal bank. But he's had it with the so-called miller Ing regWators asked financial institutions main bug. to make sure their borrowers are prepared. Last month.Mr.Lee,the chief financial The banks in return requested chains of officer of Mirage Resorts Inc. in las Ve, Mirage Resoru' computer progress. "1 gas,got a two-page Picture Turn W Pope AIS.eblumn I query tram Har - reb's Bntertaur ment Inc..in Main phis.Tenn..asking �.+r whether Mirage's computers are 1 ,1 ready for the new millennium. "Who ' -� a „ is leading your Y2K .y .�,.. efforts?" Harrah's , asked Mr. Lee, re- questing tltiea ' Millennium Bugged and Hating It , he names and phone Continued s ys M .YnfLm Pape Mr.Ln. as ore he got into on Wall "ambers' Dar tee have 10 banks."says Ala.Lee."1 got forms bMg business was one of me first b Wall Such letters are from each asking if we are Y2K compliant Streettoanalyaemecaztrio lndustrybazkm mmmonnow uoors will eush to eto cope and if we've asked all our suppliers H the 1980s.started outbeing polite.But thhb that that computers will 99 tole m cope they're Y2K compliant." response to banks last May.he asked for a Ing to avoid id brdate eakdowns from 1999 to al liaDO.bility Hop- A trickle became a torrent. He got modicum of common sense: `Our dealers Ing yeavoidbreaktlowns and they an seMury forms from suppliers who sell beer to Mb ,do not need computers to deal cards.' flanker 2000probleme, theyare seeking rage Resorts'cautious-the Golden Nugget, And he suggested a potential bright side blanket assurances Irom people they do Treasure Island,the Mirage and Helaine. to computer havoc.Federal airbaffircom business writ coal they, too, are mine.rhart prepared. Treason got forms from credit-card processors trot computers could fail.Then the Federal Mr.Lee scrawledMe in "Thwho are in trade r Morgan Stanley rsand(.in&Cr_ era ground lanes Administration would bets rced would. largersoclents our on Y2 property who are in ton.He go operators and from tour opera ground planes in tar Vegas. "This wm ost of their alone... fax efforts.I'mst" not sure tors.Hegotquerin about mhis elevators and of oourse,occuron Jan.1,2000.hope.be of their phone and fax numbers." Ms To Mr.Lea's air-conditioning systems. of er i best customers New will,we hope.oe he Asked for the names of his suppliers,d. To Mr.Lea's dismay,even Ns own staff covering from the New Year's parry of the listed"Cad"and gave"Heaven"as me tub win to the urge to blanket suppliers they Me.Lee al h his cankers. a hen bad fwant.the Then.In the margins,be scribbled wdh form letters. dae day he ubtearn as- they will be trappeestimation. here. .. 'Not a lad further remarks to Colin Reed, the best lug staff had created especial ng.He p to Thing in his his contempt chief I've seen officer: 'This situation me best signed tome paperwork) andliet Heputa Despite Mscontemptfor ing islderol, proof I've seen yet mat the Y2K situation b stop to that. I said,I'll handle the paper Me.Lee actually has been doing his oil for a...scheme initialed by Bill Gates,el al.. work.you torkonme computeout of the formsays.s the turn of the operatnum.The eaonlds to sell sofmare." t came in.Hat he co ld many ignore fmms desk has been o.sum rig m the year 21100. The questionnaire he mucked specifi- that came in.But he couldn't ies a n a 22- ahead a months ,since be set Its rate Rd rally pertained to the computer readiness page epistle from the Securities and Ex glRatl months ego as a test. Mirage Ro- of an AOanuc CI puking lot coal Flat- change Commission Instructing him on seats installed a new hotel-reservationsys- ry p g how to report his Y2K progress in federal tem and has signed a 52.1 million mnsuib rah's rents(rom Mirage Reasons.The lot is filings.-They want charts and graphs and m contract to make sure its gambler very low-tech. I'm not even sure that it's diagrams.'Mc Lee says. g paved,"says the/2yearold Mr.Lee. Butwhen Harrah's asked how he is coin cracking systems are ready. In me end. So,asked by Hamah's to describe how muNcetmg hta computer progress to cus Mr. Lee expects Mirage to have spent he has tested the parking lot's systems,he tamers.Mr.Lee omput back."How many about$30 million on preparedness. responded: "We took an old Ford pickup people do you want me b fax this w an I We're being very diligent about every- people and removed the clock. We then have to repeat thls exercise monthly?As an thing in all Ws except the damned paper drove the Ford to the site and parked it.be, aside,how many nets and how many man- work,'be says."because I'm sick of il' Ing careful to avoid the rodents mentioned years are being wasted by Ys"K paperwork?' �rq. �genwlllnl: Foranownemuur above.It drove fine.It parked fine.We are MI.Reed,the executive at Harrah I who re, al&]man amm efforts u prtWrt mmpulen seeking an expensive consultant who will calved Mr.Lee's response.got the idea.He was tin me Year aloe,see The wall stneuauem over verify,based on this data,that our parking heard to mumble:"This is a lm M ponder.' active Faison at my:gwn.aaa lot is Y2K compliant." jAo - L4T 2 PjOhw The Honolulu Advertiser ''$$'�� Wednesday,November 11,1998 AWAIT B City Desk:525-8090 Hewer char a tu � Sewer nhllincreases Possible monthly sewer charges for a typical family of lour on Oahu.The New policy wins council OK water projects and cover The fee then would exact rates r. beselby the City costsother costs over the next 20 Increase annually by 3.1 per- Council lateater. years. Up to now, the city cent to as much as 7.2 percent By ypiM m Kreelnek approved new policies that used borrowed money backed through fiscal year 2017, Now ................r33.fi6 Admeteer Caphol Bureau Chief essentially require the city by the citys taxing power. when the average monthly July 2001............$37.13 wastewater system to be self. The city Is planning almost bill would be$83.94. July 2006............$46.40 A new Honolulu policy that supporting. $1.7 billion in construction, Earlier, city Environmental July 2011............$51.04 could lead to sewer fee platinum said he opposed the repairs and other wastewater Services Director Kenneth July 2016............463.94 Increases of at least 3 percent proposal because he felt the projects over the next 20 Sprague said if the City Coun- a year — with residents pay- Issue needed more public dis- years. cll didn't go along with the s.vn.gmN ing more than $80 a month 20 cussion.The policy could lead Under the city administra. administration's proposal for Years from now — received to large sewer rate Increases tion proposal to pay for the covering the costs through City Council approval yester- in the near future,he said. work, the currently average fee Increases, sewer system day. Under the financing plan, monthly sewer fee of 933.65 users would probably see off money borrowed earlier. The By an 8-1 vote, with Coun- the city would use revenue for a family of four would rise even higher increases In their administration's newest proposal cllman Duke.Balnum (Wells- bonds essentially backed by by 3.1 percent to $34.69 for bills next year and later. calls for lower rate Increases life, St. Louts Heights, Wai- the clty's wastewater fees to the fiscal year that begins That's because more money because earlier debt would be klkl) dissenting, the council borrow money for waste- July 1,2000. would be needed to help pay refinanced. March against domestic violence Council 7 ,7}, approves '�t11-p2�L�111 fi rs' .i+w•i; ' J' ' .,K, w _,A - 1lrt ,4,�u, i �. makeover McIntyre, Donald From: Dubois, Marc Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 1998 8:38 AM To: Everyone Subject: FW: CAPPOLIST: Phone Scam Staff, please be aware. Thanks, Marc -----Original Message-- From: Anthony Bernard FSMTP:abernardCcbgsais.co.orance.ca.usl <mailto: fS MTP:abe rnard(aa)gsais.co.orange.ca.usl> Sent: None Subject: CAPPOLIST: Phone Scam FYI One of our County employees received a phone call from an individual identifying himself as an AT&T service technician who was conducting a test on our telephone lines. The 'technician*stated that to complete the test, he should touch nine (9), zero(0),the pound sign (#) and then hang up. He was suspicious and refused. Upon checking with the telephone company, he was informed pushing 90#gives the requesting individual full access to your telephone line, allowing them to place long distance calls billed to your account. He was further informed that this scam has been originating from many jails and prisons. Pacific Ball, MCI, Bell Atlantic, GTE, UCB Telecomm, and NYNEX have verified this information and asked that this information be passed along to organizations and entities we correspond with. 1 Daily Pilot Page 1 of 1 I NEWS BRIEFS INes co Tuesday, November 24, 1998 Debay elected chair of sanitation board e Newport Beach official is first woman to head district directors ewport Beach Councilwoman Jan Debay last week was _elected chairwoman of the Orange County Sanitation District board of directors, making her the first woman to lead the board since the district was formed in 1954. Debay, who has been on the Newport Beach council for the past six years, was appointed to the sanitation district board in 1993. The 25-member board represents all the cities in the district's service area, which covers 470 square miles in central and northern Orange County and serves 2.2 million people. Michelle Tuchman, director of communications for the sanitation district, said the former board chairman, Bernie Dunlap, left the board after losing his bid for re-election to the Brea City Council. Debay was elected unanimously at the board's Wednesday meeting. She also is a member of the board's steering committee and the past chairwoman of the planning, design and construction committee. Feedback to dailypilotna.earthlink.net So. California co ISite Index EHIGO http://www.dailypilot.com/HOME/COh4MUN/PAPERS/PILOTBRIEFS/topstory.htral 11/24/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register )1eu--4- Lk3C La Nina has stalled = = .. . and coexists with El Nino in the Pacific WEATHER: Oceanogra- "The forecasted _ phers believe the ocean intensification of and the climate system this La Nina for have not recovered fail 1998 and into '0 from warming. winter 1999 has et to live u to The Associated Press y f 1 '� +i_•yt PASADENA—Lis Nina and El its billing.rr Nino seem to be getting along. BILL PATZERT Measurements of sea surface research oceanographer - + height made by the TopexPosei- El Nino are essentially oppo- Nan satellite show that the he sites,and the status of both he. a, Nona condition stalled in the P — with tropical Pacific is last year-5 nomena al important to forecast. with the remnants of last year's '^B global weather patterns be- Aw tl El Nino event, according to re- cause of the interaction of the searchers at NASA's Jet Propul. ocean water with the atmosphere + soon Laboratory. above it. NASAJPLTne A,smiated Press Coexistence of the two con. During a La Nina,trade winds LA NINA: The pool of cold Pacific Ocean water that is part of La Nina trasting conditions causes ocean. are stronger than normal, and is shown in this Nov. 8 image.The dark image below the equator ographers to believe that the cold water that normally exists shows the characteristic of colder-than-normal water temperature. ocean and the climate system along the coast of South America have not recovered from the re- extends to the central equatorial cord-breaking warming that oc- Pacific. curred during the past two years. The condition is associated JPL said. with the possibility of more win- "The forecasted intensifica- ter storms entering North Amer- tion of this La Nina for fall 1998 ica through the Pacific North. and into winter 1999 has yet to west and drier conditions in the live up to its billing," research Southern tier states. oceanographer Bill Patzert said An El Nino occurs when west- recently. ward-blowing trade winds weak- "The size and heat content of en, allowing a large mass of this cold pout of water has re- warm water that has built up in mained remarkably stable for the Western Pacific to pulse back the past five months since El eastward along the equator to- Nino began to dissipate in mid- ward the coast of South America. .rune." he said. The 199;-98 El Nino created re- JPL's latest image of the phe- cord rainfall in California,heart' nomena, based on Topex data, flooding in Peru. drought and depicts sea-surface height rela- wildfires in Indonesia and torna- nve to normal ocean conditions does and flooding in the South- �m Nov. 8. Sea-surface height is east states. on indicator of how much heat Topex Poseidon, a joint U.S .- the ocean contains. French project, was launched in The image shows remnants of August 1993 and orbits the Earth El Nino's warmer writers—in& at an altitude of 830 miles,using :aced by high sea level — still several instruments to measure lingeringnorth oftheequator.At sea level and the water vapor the same time, the area of cold content of the atmosphere. water known as La Nina—inch- its prime mission ended in fall gated by low,sea level—remains 199S, but it continues to operate .n the center of the Pacific on an extended hasis A followup rrujeuf arms to re%nc uuwg eefp regc 1 ul+ o Ng MARKETPLACE F—m ome age -7m u o ccess � m TKU OMN@ COUNTY PEGL11ER /T.1f+-tee ocregisterecom Project aims to revive ailing kelp _ ENVIRONMENT: Edison will cultivate artifical kelp forests to replace those -- '- -z 7 destroyed by a nuclear plant. Technology 6 eo,,W g Edge of N.W. lifbff November 29, 1998 our unNerse By PAT BRENNAN TIMES AND PLACES The Orange County Register e A public meeting on Southern California An ambitious plan to create an Edison's plan to build a artificial kelp reef off the Orange 150-acre kelp reef off County coast will be unveiled the San Clemen ete Dec. 10 by Southern Californi coast will be D c. 10 in a the San Clemente Edison. It is a project meant to Community Center, compensate for the destruction Ole Hanson Room, of natural kelpforests b the San 10o N.morCalle Seville. Y . For more Onofre nuclear plant. Information,Call Mary Griggs at the California Edison environmental officials State Lands Commission, (916) will explain their proposal to 574-1814. dump rock or chunks of concrete a Obtain copies of across 150 acres of ocean the environmental bottom about half a mile off San impact report on the project by wnting me Clemente. The material will act California State Lands as attachment points for kelp, a commission, Division e of al that es of environmental type algae Planning provides$ P Planning and habitat for a variety offish, Management, 100 crustaceans and other animals. Howe Ave., Suite 100 South, Sacramento, Calif. 95825-6202. If all goes well, kelp spores floating in seawater will begin growing on the rocks without human intervention, eventually forming the undulating kelp forests that are among the more spectacular ecosystems found in near-shore waters. "It's like the proverbial field of dreams," said Frank L. Melone, project manager for Edison's kelp reef. "If you build it, they will come." The public meeting, to be held at the San Clemente http://www.ocregister.com/archives/I998/11/29/science/reefD29w.shtml 11/30/98 YrOJCCI allllb W re%I%e ainog kelp rd)_IC _ UI Y , Community Center, is only the beginning of a length}' series of public sessions, and approval by government agencies, needed before work can begin on the reef. Melone hopes Edison will be ready to start the first phase of the estimated $50 million to $60 million project by fall 1999. Edison will start with an experimental 16.8-acre plot to test ideas for how best to build the kelp reef. Although the science behind the construction of artificial kelp reefs is relatively new, two such projects off the San Diego coast have proved successful in recent years. Still, the California Coastal Commission, which ordered Edison to build the reef, wants the company to study whether reefs are best built of rock or concrete fragments, Melone said. The experimental plot will include a series of 42 modules that will contain different proportions of rock, concrete and sand. Melone hopes the concrete, gathered from road projects and construction sites, will prove the best option. "We think there are a lot of advantages to concrete." he said. "We would be using material that is a waste product, and using it in a way that helps the environment." Concrete also would be far cheaper than rock. And quarrying rock, whether from Santa Catalina Island or the mainland, would involve far more trips by diesel trucks, increasing the amount of air pollution caused by the Edison project, he said. Assessing the effects on air quality is one of the main themes of an environmental impact report prepared on the project. Edison would be required to make up for any si_nificant air pollution — for example, by reducing the number of truck trips or purchasing new low-polluting diesel engines. In the worst case, the project would be built entirely of rock and take eight years to complete. Melone said, resulting in large quantities of air pollution. http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/11/29/science/reefD29w.shtml 11/30/98 MJCUt auna w M%[%C uumg nap The reef construction itself will be watched closely by a variety of government agencies and environmental groups. It is the largest such project ever attempted and, whether it succeeds or fails, will yield important scientific data. "This presents an opportunity to learn quite a bit about how to do this right," said Dennis Bedford, a marine biologist who is coordinating the state's artificial-reef program for the Department of Fish and Game. He said Edison's program appears to be on track. Kelp forests have been severely depleted off the Southern California coast, disrupting sport fishing and diving. A warming of ocean water by El Nino caused the die-off, although Bedford said there are signs of a reversal. "Recruitment for kelp seems to be really good this year," he said. Although the area where Edison plans to build its reef is lacking in kelp spores, there will, with luck, be plenty by the time the project starts, he said. The reef project has had a rocky history. Concern about the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station's effect on kelp beds began in the late 1980s, when a scientific panel concluded that the plant's cooling system was spreading fine sediment across submerged rocks that had supported kelp forests. The gradual burial of the rocks left the kelp with no solid surface on which to grow. The Coastal Commission ordered Edison to grow 300 acres of kelp in compensation. In 1996, Edison asked for a reduction in the amount of kelp it had to grow, arguing that new scientific data showed that the nuclear plant's effects on kelp were far less harmful than estimated. The commission eventually settled on 150 acres. Edison must also restore 150 acres of degraded wetlands in San Dieguito Lagoon as part of the deal. at an estimated cost of$60 million, and continue http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/11/29/science/recfD29w.shtml 11/30/98 rrulcct nwta ku rok tae auutg producing white sea bass at a fish hatchery. The kelp reef will be monitored by the Coastal Commission for many years to ensure that it thrives; Edison will pay for the monitoring, expected to cost $200,000 to $300,000 a year. How long the monitoring lasts depends on how long the San Onofre plant continues operating. The plant is scheduled to be shut down in 2013; Melone said the monitoring would probably have to continue for 15 years after that. The Coastal Commission can reduce the monitoring if the kelp appears to be healthy. 016awspopsiTn Oianpe Coumy,Cseiumii - --------- —�'_-��� copyright 1998 The Orange county Register Please send wmments to ocre9ater.Q k.ireedom.psm http://www.ocregister.com/archives/I998/11/29/science/reef029w.shtml 11/30/98 Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 18, 1998 pJN ANIrgT� x c� If � 9 2= o � Fclro� EHv\�p� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 OCSO*P.O.Boa 9127•Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714)962-2411 Minutes for Board Meeting 11/18/98 Page 2 of 6 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on November 18, 1998, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Bumie Dunlap, Chair Glenn Parker X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson John Holmberg X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X George Brown Shawn Boyd X John Collins Laurann Cook X Jan Debay John E. Noyes X Barry Denes Richard A. Freschi X Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry A John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Eva Miner-Bradford Paul F.Walker X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan A Margie Rice James V. Evans X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts X Christina Shea Barry Hammond A William G. Steiner Todd Spitzer X Dave Sullivan Tom Hannan X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates A Bob Zemel Tom Daly STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Petennan; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Chuck Winsor; Mike Moore; Layne Baroldi; Jim Herberg; John Linder, Mark Esquer, Jean Tappan OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Mary Lee; Charles Egigian-Nichols; Terry Lane; Harvey Gobas Minutes for Board Meeting 11/18/98 Page 3 of 6 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Directors George Brown, Barry Denes, and Bob Zemel, for their contribution and dedication to public. service upon their retirement from the District. REPORT OF THE CHAIR The Chair reminded the Directors that the Board of Directors' meeting for December would be held on December 16th due to the holidays. Chair Dunlap also announced that the Orange County Water District would be hosting a Groundwater Replenishment System open house on December 1 between 2:00 p.m. and TOO p.m. The public hearing for this project is scheduled to be held on December Bat 5:30 p.m. at the Orange County Water District. All Directors were invited to attend both events. It was then reported that Director Tom Saltarelli would be replacing Director George Brown as the Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager noted that the warrants listing included in the agenda package is different than what was previously mailed, in that the listings are more comprehensive and contain payroll totals. Mr. McIntyre also referred the Directors to a memo included in their meeting folders that evening regarding information requested by a property owner, and that the information requested was to be mailed to the property owner. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 28, 1998, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: 10/15/98 10/31/98 Totals $4,205,168.51 li $3,608.042.68 Minutes for Board Meeting 11/18/98 Page 4 of 6 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 9. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the November 18, 1998 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 28, 1998 to be filed. 10. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the November 4, 1998 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 4, 1998 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley, providing for the City to use District's diesel and unleaded fueling station at Plant 1 at cost plus 5% administration fees, in a form approved by General Counsel. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation providing for payment for the operation of the CNG Refueling Station at a cost of$0.10 per gallon for all sales, and maintenance costs of$900 per month plus parts, for one year, in a form approved by General Counsel. 10. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Global Security Complex for an option to purchase a 64D-acre site in Kern County for an amount not to exceed $62,400, in a form approved by General Counsel; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to initiate and conduct due diligence research of said 640-acre site for use as a biosolids composting facility and for composting of other related feedstock including manure, green waste, food wastes and other agriculture residues in an amount not to exceed$100,000. 11. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the November 5, 1998 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 5, 1998 to be filed. Minutes for Board Meeting 11/18/98 Page 5 of 6 11. c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-3, providing for additional planning and design services in the amount of$293.022, increasing the total amount not exceed $1,403,740. Directors Brian Donahue and Christina Shea opposed. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P242, providing for additional programming services and testing, for an additional amount of$62,993, increasing the total amount not to exceed$7,119,469. 12. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1998. 13. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Groundwater Replenishment System (Job No. J-36) dated November 5, 1998. 14. ELECTION OF CHAIR Chair Dunlap announced that due to his retirement from the Board of Directors effective December 1, 1998, the office of Chair would be vacant and election of a new Chair would be in order. Nominations were then called for the post, whereupon Director Jan Debay was nominated. There being no further nominations, it was: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED to close nominations. IT WAS FURTHER MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED to elect Director Jan Debay as the Chair of the Orange County Sanitation District. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director Burnie Dunlap for his contribution and dedication to public service upon his retirement from the District. Minutes for Board Meeting 11/18/98 Page 6 of 6 CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: The Board convened in closed session at 7:50 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with Califomia Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. The Board did not consider Item No. 16(a)(1), and no report was given on that item. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 16(a)(2) and (3). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:01 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:01 p.m. .�iGtr?G Secretary#the Board Directors of Orange County Sanit n District H1wp.dla%agendatl 998 Joint Board MlnulesN 118.98.dec Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011198 - 10116/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 14482 Barry C. Groveman, Esq. $ 15,000.00 Expert Witness Fees 14483 Isiah J. Mitchell 50,000.00 EEOC Settlement&Release Claim#J-CSD-98-L-11 14484 Carollo Engineers 59,880.63 Engineering Services-P1-38, P243,MO4-14-93 14485 Orange County Sanitation District 396,354.64 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 14486 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 89,062.51 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 14487 Western States Chemical Inc. 46,409.02 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 14488 Court Order 212.50 Wage Garnishment 14489 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 14490 Brown and Caldwell 3.713.88 Construction Contract MO 7-24-96 14491 Bush&Associates Inc. 18.654.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 14492 Court Ord" 581.00 Wage Gamishment 14493 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Gamishmenl 14494 CASA 175.00 Conference Registration m 14495 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment y 14496 DGA Consultants, Inc. 3,694.62 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 y 14497 Franchise Tax Board 522.24 Wage Garnishment 14498 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 14499 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 COP Arbitrage Rebate 14500 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,788.75 Dues Deduction 14501 IPCO Safety-Ca 768.85 Safety Supplies 14502 Labware Inc. 1,500.00 Lab Information Management System Software MO 2.26.97 14503 Lee&Ro Inc. 21.998.90 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-93 14504 Lessons in Leadership 1.275.00 Seminar Registration 14505 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 664.70 Tools 14508 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange 7,010.00 ULFT Program 14507 Office Depot Business Services 3,436.36 Office Supplies 14508 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 14509 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 14510 OCEA 582.62 Dues Deduction 14511 Pacific Mechanical Supply 555.06 Plumbing Supplies 14512 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 14513 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 14514 Peace Officers Council of CA 837.00 Dues Deduction 14515 Precision Backhce 6,622.80 Equipment Rental 14516 RJN Group, Inc. 9.000.00 CMMS Consulting Services 14517 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 334.80 Specialty Gases 111g198 1:50 PM BA Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xis Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011/98 - 10115198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14618 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 139.59 Tools 14519 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 576.64 Tools/Hardware 14520 Snap-On Incorporated 235.96 Tools 14521 State of California 95.42 Hazardous Waste Tax 14622 Summit Steel 1,098.29 Metal 14523 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 202.32 Mechanical Supplies 14524 Mary S.Thompson 116.85 Training Expense Reimb. 14525 Lisa L.Tomko 300.00 Training Expense Reimb. 14526 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions 14527 Valcom 2,988.45 Software 14528 Tadao G.Vilko 151.80 Training Expense Reimb. 14529 Nicholas J.Amontes 102.46 Meeting Expense Relmb. 14530 Bradley H.Cagle 223.76 Meeting Expense Relmb. 14531 Barbara A. Collins 144.98 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14532 Ronald L. Dewitt,Jr. 275.29 Training Expense Reimb. 14533 Rick B. Russell 708.39 Training Expense Reimb. 14534 Operation Technology, Inc. 890.00 Computer Software 14535 Allied Supply Company 40,401.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies to y 14536 IPI'GrammTech, Inc. 76,875.00 Computer Software-PowerMart Suite needed for Data Warehouse/Integration y 14537 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 25,816.20 Sewer Emergency Repair 300 fl of 24" D.I.P. in Zone 5 N 14538 Keiser Foundation Health Plan 25.358.56 Medical Insurance Premium 14539 Kemiran Pacific, Inc, 50,554.80 Ferris Chloride MO 9-27-95 14540 Network Catalyst 43.730.35 (14)3 COM Computer Networking Hubs 14541 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 29,604.39 Instrument Supplies 14542 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 139,770.48 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 14543 Tule Ranch/Magen Fans 37,176.67 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 14544 United Healthcare I Metra Health 132,963.79 Medical Health Insurance 14545 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 172,973.90 Construction J-34-1, P2-35-5 14546 First Fire Systems, Inc. 115,854.92 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-25-98 14547 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 28,481.72 Construction 7.17 14548 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. 258,275.25 Construction 3.38.3,2-R-97 14549 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 90,962.85 Construction Contract#2-40 14550 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 195,888.10 Construction 7-7-1 14651 American Telephone&Telegraph 3,404.02 Long Distance Telephone Services 14552 American Telephone&Telegraph 2.19 Long Distance Telephone Services 14563 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 22,921.02 0&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 14654 Airborne Express 03.45 Air Freight 14665 Allied Electronics, Inc. 156.32 Electrical Supplies 1119198 1:50 PM BA Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xls Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011/98-10115198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14556 American Seals West 21.55 Gaskets 14557 American Sigma, Inc. 17.516.36 Mechanical Supplies 14558 Anixter Inc. 4,373.25 Computer Supplies 14559 Appleone Employment Service 4,616.37 Temporary Employment Services 14560 Applied Industrial Technology 984.98 Pump Supplies 14561 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 4,500.00 Lab Supplies 14562 Arizona Instrument 1,267.90 Instrument Supplies 14563 Armor-Vac 1,738.00 Vacuum Truck Services 14564 Arrow Craneholst Corp. 43.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 14565 Asco Services 2,497.64 Emergency Repair of Transfer Switch-Bay Bridge Pump Station 14566 Aurora Data Systems 11,495.00 MSDS Pro Enterprise Version&Service Agreement-Intranet Project 14567 Awards&Trophies By Bea 105.73 Plaques 14568 ABL, Inc. 199.00 Subscription 14569 Assoc of Metro.Sewemge Agencies 905.00 Training Registration 14570 APEX Communications 6.534.87 Communication Equipment Upgrade tl 14571 Banana Blueprint, Inc. 1,975.87 Printing MO 11-7-94 y 14572 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 2,992.16 Telephone Installation y 14573 Battery Specialties 173.78 Batteries w 14574 Ben Franklin Crafts 39.87 Award 14575 BioSpherical Instruments Inc. 9.32 Electrical Supplies 14576 Black Box Corporation 6,729.15 Computer Supplies 14577 Bristol Systems, Inc. 12,000.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 14578 Builders Book, Inc. 45.54 Subscription 14579 BNI Building News 531.00 Subscription 14580 BOC Edwards 765.85 Lab Supplies 14581 California Municipal Statistics, Inc. 425.00 Computation of OCSD Direct&Ovedapping Debt 14582 Caltrol, Inc. 434.52 Hardware 14583 Carrell Corp. 4,662.50 Service Agreement 14584 Carl Warren&Co. 1.094.31 Insurance Claims Administrator 14585 Centrepointe Commercial Interior 7,499.41 Office Furniture 14586 Cerrnet 20.00 Computer Services 14587 Charles P. Crowley Co. 655.71 Instrument Parts 14588 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas 8,370.75 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP 14589 City of Costa Mesa 2.508.00 Service Contract-Fairview Road Rehabilitation 14590 City of Fullerton 2,500.00 Water Use 14591 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 2.104.84 Professional Services 14592 Cole-Parmer Instrument Company 168.25 Lab Supplies 14593 Computers America, Inc. 1.576.15 Computer Supplies 11/9198 1:50 PM BA Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xls Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011198 - 10/16/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14594 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 6,123.59 Electrical Supplies 14595 Consolidated Freightways 430.51 Freight 14596 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 762.87 Plumbing Supplies 14597 Converse Consultants 102.00 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 14598 Cooper Cameron Corporation 1,542.24 Engine Supplies 14599 - Corporate Express Imaging 158.65 Instrument Supplies 14600 Corporate Express 654.88 Office Supplies 14601 CorDax/Bentley Systems, Inc. 4,040.63 Computer Software for Plant Automation/Reinvention Project#J-42 14602 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 45.31 Truck Parts 14603 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 146.53 Mechanical Supplies 14604 County of Orange 2,898.91 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 14605 County Wholesale Electric Co. 259.68 Electrical Supplies 14606 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 1,313.10 Lab Supplies 14607 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 922.37 Lab Supplies 14608 Datavault 320.50 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 14609 Dell Marketing L.P. 15,192.78 6 Computer Workstations y 14610 DeZurick 1,512.81 Valves y 14611 Dover Elevator Company 1,203-60 Elevator Maintenance ,0 14612 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 306.82 Paint Supplies 14613 Electra Bond, Inc. 560.30 Mechanical Supplies 14614 Elsevier Science 589.00 Subscription 14615 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 14616 EIS Electrical Insulation Supply 157.68 Electrical Supplies 14617 Federal Express Corp. 56.35 Air Freight 14618 Filter Supply Company 674.28 Filters 14619 Fisher Scientific 720.96 Lab Supplies 14620 Flo-Systems, Inc. 1,838.97 Pump Supplies 14621 Forked Engineering&Surveying 10.455.00 Engineering Services P-150 14622 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,689.31 Long Term Disability Premium 14623 Fountain Valley Camera 47.20 Photo Supplies 14624 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 732.19 Paint Supplies M25 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 396.00 Truck Wash Tickets 14626 Franklin Covey Co. 229.00 Training Registration 14627 Fry's Electronics 2,94424 Computer Supplies 14628 GTE California 3,559.09 Telephone Services 14629 Gieriich-Mitchell, Inc. 10.00 Pump Supplies 14630 W W Grainger Inc. 1,416.49 Compressor Supplies 14631 Graphic Distributors 818.90 Photographic Supplies 11/9/96 1:50 PM BA Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.YIs Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011/98 - 10/15198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14632 Graseby STI 2,494.10 Engine Supplies 14633 Graybar Electric Company 15,269.58 Electrical Supplies 14634 Great American Printing Co. 1,428.20 Printing Service 14635 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 511.15 Janitorial Supplies 14636 Haaker Equipment Company 2,618.04 Truck Supplies M37 Hach Company 69.08 Lab Supplies 14638 Harbour Engineering Group 2,911.10 Mechanical Parts 14639 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples 14640 Harrington Industrial Plastics 480.73 Plumbing Supplies 14641 Hatch 8 Kirk Inc. 5.947.15 Truck Supplies 14642 Herb's Blackforest Bakery& Deli 462.20 Training Expense for Catering-Div 720 8 730 14643 Hoerbiger Service Inc. 1,347.50 Compressor Parts 14644 The Holman Group 738.40 Employee Assistance Program Premium 14645 Home Depot 352.52 Small Hardware 14646 Hub Auto Supply 275.46 Truck Parts 14647 Huntington Beach Library 185.50 Meeting Room Renal Fee y 14648 HI Standard Automotive 1,677.11 Truck Parts 7 14649 Idexx 1,622.87 Lab Supplies u 14650 Imaging Plus, Inc. 460.76 Office Supplies 14651 Impulse 87.17 Mechanical Supplies 14652 Industrial Steam 220.06 Pump Supplies 14653 Industrial Threaded Products 5,693.41 Connectors 14654 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 261.87 Lab Supplies 14655 IBM Corporation 538.79 After-hours Phone Support-Various AS/400 Problems 14656 IPCO Safety-Ca. 211.55 Safety Supplies 14657 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 520.47 Instrument Supplies 14658 J.L.Wingert Co. 390.69 Electrical Supplies 14659 J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. 22,451.51 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series 14660 J.P. Nissen Co. 47.77 Office Supplies 14661 Jay's Catering 213.95 Director's Meeting Expense 14662 John Mangiapane 400.00 Repair Service-Trawl Nets 14663 Johnstone Supply 1,402.64 Electrical Supplies 14664 Kelly Paper 403.32 Paper 14665 Knox Industrial Supplies 5,860.15 Tools 14666 Komax Systems, Inc. 623.12 Plumbing Supplies 14667 Lantronix 116.37 Computer Supplies 14668 League Of California Cities 500.00 Conference Registration 14669 Lexis-Nexis 373.41 Subscription 1119198 1:50 PM BA Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-93.xls Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 10/1198-10115/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14670 LA Cellular Telephone Company 32.31 Cellular Telephone Service 14671 M.E. Silbermann Co. 24,197.70 Sewer Repair 14672 Mamco International 139.00 Janitorial Supplies 14673 Mar Vac Electronics 76.50 Instrument Supplies 14674 Margate Construction 7,000.00 Construction Pl-36-2 14675 Mc Junkin Corp 3,880.65 Plumbing Supplies 14676 McKenna Engineering&Equipment 1,794.06 Pump Supplies 14677 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,685.74 Tools 14678 McWelco Rack-N-Box Co. 574.85 Auto Parts&Supplies 14679 Micro Flex 304.00 Gloves 14680 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 13,537.73 Mechanical Repairs 14681 Mission Uniform Service 1,735.27 Uniform Rentals 14682 Motion Industries 73.38 Pump Supplies 14683 MotoPhoto 18.19 Photographic Services 14684 MGD Technologies, Inc. 4,660.00 Maintenance Agreement 14685 MPS Photographic Services 36.10 Water System Maint.Agreement y 14686 MSA C/O Mag Systems 273AO Electrical Supplies y 14687 Mine Safety Appliances Company 4.981.02 Safety Supplies 14688 National Civic League 325.00 Meeting Registration 14689 National Plant Services, Inc. 5,900.00 Vacuum Truck Services 14690 Neal Supply Co. 452.55 Plumbing Supplies 14691 Newark Electronics 147.96 Instrument Supplies 14692 Nextel Communications 476.47 Cellular Phones&Air Time 14693 Nickey Petroleum Co. Inc. 1,766.46 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 14694 NAS Associates, Inc. 483.00 Service Agreement-1998 Regional Monitoring Program 14695 Office Depot Business Services 905.71 Office Supplies 14696 Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 768.00 Temporary Employment Services 14697 Oracle Education 1.515.00 Training Registration 14698 Orange County EMA 808.50 Permit Fees 14699 Orange County Farm Supply 123.91 Chemicals 14700 Orange County Wholesale Electric 438.86 Instrument Supplies 14701 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 534.96 Fittings 14702 Oxygen Service Company 1,919.64 Specialty Gases 14703 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 970.10 Electrical Supplies 14704 Pacific Bell 35.76 Telephone Services 14705 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,703.86 Plumbing Supplies 14706 Padre Janitorial Supplies 538.16 Janitorial Supplies 14707 Pagenet 1,730.91 Rental Equipment 11/9/98 1:50 PM BA Page 6 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xIs Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011198 - 10/15/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14708 Parts Unlimited 259.84 Truck Supplies 14709 Peeress Wiping Materials Co. 721.93 Janitorial Supplies 14710 Polydyne, Inc. 11,557.87 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 14711 Port Supply 203.00 Rope 14712 Power Design 3,839.70 Electrical Repairs 14713 Power Systems Services, Inc. 3,600.00 Service Agreement-Blowers 4&5 Testing 14714 Prosum Information Technologies 1.200.00 Consulting Service-Intranet FronlPage'98 14715 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 164.37 Electrical Supplies 14716 Realtime Systems Corporation 2,500.00 Integration&Support Services 14717 Remedy 6,283.93 Temporary Employment Services 14718 Reynolds&Reynolds Company 2.927.38 Printing Service-Wastehauler Manifest Form 14719 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 125.00 Auto Repair 14720 Rosen's Electrical Equipment 646.50 Electrical Supplies 14721 Royce Productions 10,503.10 Video Production Service-10 Minute Orientation Video 14722 RPM Electric Motors 2,397.44 Electric Motor Supplies m 14723 Scantech, Inc 6,013.45 Sewer System Atlas y 14724 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,486.37 Specialty Gases y 14725 Sears 40.53 Mechanical Supplies 14726 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 322.80 Tools/Hardware 14727 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 438.39 Lab Supplies 14728 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. 273.45 Plumbing Supplies 14729 Snap-On Incorporated 69.91 Tools 14730 So.Cal.Gas Company 2,123.07 Natural Gas 14731 South Coast Air Quality Management 2,537.80 Service Agreement-Review of ACEMS Application 14732 Southem California Edison 7,894.62 Power 14733 Southwest Scieniffic Inc. 4,732.38 Instrument Supplies 14734 Sparing Instruments, Inc. 126.43 Meter 14735 Spex Ceripmp Inc. 1.425.62 Lab Supplies 14736 State Chemical Mfg. Co. 137.00 Janitorial Supplies 14737 State Street Bank and Trust Co. 5,825.88 COP Trustee Services 14738 Summit Steel 2,758.99 Metal 14739 Sunset Ford 120.28 Truck Supplies 14740 Super Chem Corporation 1,209.55 Chemicals 14741 Syscom, Inc. 1,521.68 On-Site Training 14742 SKC-West, Inc. 909.89 Safety Supplies 14743 SMACNA 5.00 Publication 14744 SWRCB Accounting Once 400.00 Annual Fee 14745 Taylor-Dunn 86.04 Electric Cart Parts 11/9/98 1:50 PM BA Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-96.xis Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 10/1/98 -10116/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrlptlon 14746 Thermo LabSystems 1,500.00 Training Registration 14747 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,950.57 Mechanical Supplies 14748 Time Warner Communications 80.94 Cable Services 14749 Travel Executives 1,140.00 Travel Services 14750 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 9,003.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 14751 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 288.04 Truck Supplies 14752 TCH Associates, Inc. 512.10 Lab Supplies 14753 Ultra Scientific 88.32 Lab Supplies 14754 Valley Cities Supply Company 3,819.85 Plumbing Supplies 14755 Vertex 1,034.40 Office Furniture 14756 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7.497.00 Vision Service Premium 14757 VWR Scientific Products 2.487.74 Lab Supplies 14758 The Wackenhut Corporation 6.083.04 Security Guards 14759 Weather Services International 7.67 Computer Supplies 14760 Wellwater, Inc. 670.00 Permit Fee Refund 14761 Western Health Services 14,920.00 Degreaser 14762 Xerox Corporation 14,613.51 Copier Leases y 14763 Voided Check - - m 14764 Veme's Plumbing 9.760.00 Plumbing Supplies 14765 Shabbir S. Basrai 221.29 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14768 James E. Colston 182.25 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14767 Robert P.Ghirelli 62.81 Training Expense Reimb. 14766 Harriet Kader 193.53 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14769 Dustin Le 193.53 Training Expense Reimb. 14770 David A. Ludwin 477.28 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14771 Donald F. McIntyre 60.98 Cellular Expense Reimb. 14772 Michael D. Moore 518.80 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14773 Robert Ooten 160.50 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14774 LEllen Ray 250.00 Cash Advance 14775 Adriana Renescu 221.87 Training Expense Reimb. 14776 Antonio S.Valenzuela 107.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14777 EZ ComputerNoxon Corp. &Victor Salinas 1.928.92 Computer Loan 14778 Orange County Sanitation District 16,809.65 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 14779 Orange County Sanitation District 1,002.53 Petty Cash Reimb. 14780 Orange County Sanitation District 137.85 Petty Cash Reimb, 14781 Rita Riccardo 174.71 Training Expense Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $2,799,506.09 11/9/98 1:50 PM BA Page 8 of 9 Clalms Paid Report 10-15-98.4s Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011198 - 1 0116/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 11094.11241 Employee Paychecks $ 189.017.73 Biweekly Payroll 1017198 11242 Employee Paycheck 10,973.50 Termination 11243-11265 Directors'Paychecks 5,122.81 Payroll 10114/98 31000-31441 Direct Deposit Payments 815,891.40 Biweekly Payroll 10/7198 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 821,005.44 Wire Transfer Payments Texas Commerce Bank $ 148,842.54 October Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Texas Commerce Bank 230,837.24 October Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits State Street Bank&Trust 204,077.20 October Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certlficate of Deposits [[[777 Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 584,356.98 Total Claims Paid 1011198-10115198 $4,205,168.51 q 11/9/98 1:50 PM BA Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xls Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16/98 to 10/31/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 14782 CSMFO 6 60.00 Seminar Registration 14783 Anchor Paving 27,200.00 Raise Manholes 14784 Carollo Engineers 79,438.83 Engineering Services-P1-38,P243,MO 4-14-93 14785 Orange County Sanitation District 398,859.35 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 14786 Science Applications Intl., Co. 152,284.05 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 14787 Southern California Edison 45,538.58 Power 14788 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 33,489.11 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044 14789 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 8,905.33 Engine Testing J-19 1479D Ahsa Lynn Gorman 212.50 Wage Garnishment 14791 Almega Environmental&Technical 320.00 Service Agreement-Emissions Source Testing of Combustion Engines 14792 Barclays Law Publishers 99.00 Subscription 14793 Bentley Systems, Inc. 553.38 Software Maintenance Agreement 14794 Beverly May Gilliam 455.15 Wage Garnishment 14795 Boyle Engineering Corporation 7,430.4D Engineering Services 7-23 14796 British American Chamber of Commerce 35.00 Conference Registration m 14797 Lori Colamonico 581.00 Wage Garnishment y 14798 CorDax/Bentley Systems, Inc. 1,100.00 Registration Fee-Essential MicroStation Course 14799 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 14800 California Water Awareness Campaign 300.00 Campaign Contribution 14801 CNA Trust 19,217.10 Construction 541-1 14802 CWEA 1998 Conference 455.00 Conference Registration 14803 Diane Kilpatrick 611.07 Wage Gamishmem 14804 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 99.51 Paint Supplies 14605 DGA Consultants, Inc. 8,192.20 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 14806 Enterprise Technologies 16,754.70 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation 14807 Franchise Tax Board 97.81 Wage Garnishment 14808 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 14809 Haaker Equipment Company 57.34 Truck Supplies 14810 Holmes&Narver Inc. 1,578.20 Engineering Services 2-41 14811 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 COP Arbitrage Rebate 14812 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,774.44 Dues Deduction 14813 J&W Scientific 300.00 Lab Supplies 14814 Moreland&Associates 11,243.50 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 14815 National Seminars Group 395.00 Seminar Registration 14816 New Horizons Computer Learning 349.00 Software Training Classes 14817 The Norco Companies 111.80 Mail Delivery Service 14818 Optic,Software 1,250.D0 Software 1119/98 2:09 PM Page 1 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.x1s ,� Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16/98 to 10131/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14819 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 14820 Orange County Forum 30.00 Conference Registration 14821 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 14822 OCEA 573.37 Dues Deduction 14923 Pacific Bell 49.24 Telephone Services 14824 Pamela Garcia 100.00 Wage Garnishment 14825 Patricia Burkholder 296.00 Wage Garnishment 14826 Peace Officers Council of CA 937.00 Dues Deduction 14827 Showcase Corporation 3.232.50 Software License 14828 So. Cal.Gas Company 17,215.47 Natural Gas 14829 State of California 95A2 Hazardous Waste Tax 14830 SWRCB Accounting Office 10,000.00 Annual Fee 14831 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions 14832 Cad E. Beach 374.03 Training Expense Reimb. pJ 14833 Jeffrey Brown 96.66 Meeting Expense Reimb. i„ 14834 Barbara A. Collins 103.80 Training Expense Reimb. 14835 Rick J. Hannappel 639.00 Training Expense Reimb. '3 14836 W.Doug Hauser 195.97 Training Expense Reimb. T 14837 Warren S.Hawkins 357.46 Training Expense Reimb. 14838 Voided Check - - 14839 John Kavoklis 360.85 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14840 Vladimir A. Kogan 408.21 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14841 Beatrice A. Mitchell 193.53 Training Expense Reimb. 14842 Edward M.Tones 432.08 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14843 Marco Polo S.Velasco 422.07 Training Expense Reimb. 14844 Charles F.Winsor 1,212.15 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14845 Computer Library 2,164.89 Subscription 14846 Advanco Constructors Inc. 209.500.00 Construction J-34-1, P2-35-5 14847 Alrpol Construction, Inc. 270.345.08 Construction Pi-51R 14848 go Gro Division 30,773.89 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 14849 Business Objects Americas 49,034.44 Software-Data Warehousedntegration Project 14850 Cincinnati Incorporated 94,176.77 Hydraulic Press Brake 14851 Dell Marketing L.P. 48,238.20 10 Dell Latitude Cpi 266XT& 1 Inspiron D233XT Notebook Computers 14852 Delta Dental 38,892.82 Dental Insurance Plan 14853 James Martin&Co. 111,125.43 Data Integration Project 14854 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,385.80 Medical Insurance Premium 14855 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 38,447.45 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 14856 Margate Construction, Inc. 48.259.00 Construction P1-36-2 11/9/98 2:09 PM Page 2 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.xls Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16/98 to 10131/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14857 Olsson Construction 33,003.00 Construction P2-39-1 14858 Pacificare of Ca 40.495.97 Health Insurance Premium 14859 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 70.461.05 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 14860 Polydyne, Inc. 28,408.23 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11.92 14861 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 28,034.18 Construction 7-7-1 14862 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 69.494.26 Residuals Removal NO 3-29-95 14863 Western States Chemical, Inc. 32,610.06 Caustic Soda MO 8-23.95 14864 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 98,282.72 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 14865 The Vantage Group, Inc. 9.832.00 Professional Services-Source Control Programming 14866 American Telephone&Telegraph 13.23 Long Distance Telephone Services 14867 A-Plus Systems 696.96 Notices&Ads 14868 Abrasive Engineering Tool &Equipment 36.47 Hardware 14869 Accountants Overload 1,224.00 Temporary Employment Services 14870 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 3,647.50 Engine Testing J-19 F� 14871 Aidco Systems, Inc. 3,188.76 Engine Supplies 14872 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 13.20 Lab Supplies 14873 Airborne Express 16.50 Air Freight '-3 14874 Allied Supply Company 11.432.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies to 14875 American Management Association 139.00 Seminar Registrations/Subscription r" 14876 American National Standards, Inc. 24.00 Publication 14877 Amencan Sigma, Inc. 863.48 Mechanical Supplies 14878 Anicom, Inc. 407.30 Electrical Parts&Supplies 14879 Anixter, Inc. 41.00 Computer Supplies 14880 Appleone Employment Service 6,513.91 Temporary Employment Services 14881 Applied Industrial Technology 9.893.61 Pump Supplies 14882 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 950.00 Lab Supplies 14883 Asbury Environmental Services 55.00 Waste Oil Removal 14884 Azur Environmental 275.60 Lab Supplies 14885 AKM Consulting Engineers 20.120.00 Engineering Services 11-17-1 MO 6-24-98 14886 Bailey Fischer&Porter Company 382.27 Electrical Supplies 14887 Baker Process 999.92 Mechanical Supplies 14888 Banana Blueprint, Inc. 593.17 Printing MO 11-7-94 14889 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 225.00 Telephone Installation 14890 Battery Specialties 52.11 Batteries 14891 BuyComp 3,555.14 Computer Supplies 14892 Cal-Glass, Inc. 135.23 Lab Supplies 14893 California Environmental Controls 864.77 Electrical Parts&Supplies 14894 California Auto Refrigeration 60.30 Service Agreement 11/9/98 2:20 PM Page 3 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.x�s Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16198 to 10/31198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14895 Caltrol, Inc. 2,016.88 Hardware 14896 Canus Corporation 206.28 Fiber Optic Cable 14897 Carleton Engineers&Consultants 13.75 Engineering Services-Air Quality 14898 Cashoo, Inc. 90.39 Valve Supplies 14899 Charles P. Crowley Co. 326.36 Instrument Parts 14900 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 721.48 Professional Services 14901 Coast Rubber Stamp, Mfg. 40.19 Office Supplies 14902 Color Ads, Inc. 1,714.31 Vehicle Decals 14903 Communications Performance Group 18,180.00 Professional Services 14904 Compuserve Incorporated 254.15 Computer Services 14905 Computers America, Inc. 3,840.82 Computer Supplies 14906 Connell GM Parts 41.95 Truck Supplies 14907 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 7.331.07 Electrical Supplies 14908 Consolidated Plastics Company 642.45 Welding Equipment& Supplies 14909 Converse Consultants 382.50 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 ,.., 14910 Cooper Cameron Corporation 15,455.37 Engine Supplies 14911 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease y 14912 Corporate Express 2,508.62 Office Supplies m 14913 Cost Containment Solutions 2,128.51 Workers Comp. Services 14914 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 66.45 Truck Parts 14915 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 133.06 Mechanical Supplies 14916 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 4.356.00 Underground Tank Fees 14917 County of Orange 3,915.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 14918 County Wholesale Electric Co. 12.69 Electrical Supplies 14919 Culligan Water Conditioning 30.00 Soft Water Service 14920 CPI: Califomia Pipeline Inspection 1,173.00 Lab Supplies 14921 CR&R Incorporated 315.00 Container Rentals 14922 CWEA 1998 Conference 315.00 Conference Registration 14923 Daily Pilot 150.00 Notices&Ads 14924 Day-Timers, Inc. 27.74 Office Supplies 14925 Decorative Arts 650.00 Refinish Desk 14926 Del Mar Analytical 2,382.00 Biosolids Analysis 14927 DeZurick 14,287.87 Valves 14928 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 468.73 Paint Supplies 14929 Duthie Generator Service, Inc. 6,306.00 Generator Supplies 14930 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 200.00 Medical Screening 14931 Electra Bond, Inc. 1,777.88 Mechanical Supplies 14932 Emergency Management Network 3,000.00 CPR/First Aid Training 1119198 2:09 PM Page 4 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98 xls Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10116/98 to 10/31/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14933 Enchanter, Inc. 6,300.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 14934 Enterprise Technologies 5,432.50 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation 14935 Environmental Resources Association 1,238.80 Lab Services 14936 ESP Industries, Inc. 216.36 Mechanical Supplies 14937 Federal Express Corp. 127.15 Air Freight 14938 Filter Supply Company 530.17 Filters 14939 Fisher Scientific 388.64 Lab Supplies 14940 Fluke Electronics Corp. 11,152.24 Electrical Supplies 14941 Fountain Valley Camera 28.04 Photo Supplies 14942 Voided Check - - 14943 Voided Check - - 14944 Fry's Electronics 950.64 Computer Supplies 14945 FST Sand and Gravel, Inc. 552.13 Road Base Materials 14946 G.E. Supply Company 451.58 Electric Parts 14947 Ganahl Lumber Company 178.00 Lumber/Hardware H 14948 GTE California 6,228.63 Telephone Services to 14949 George Yardley Co. 1,193.67 Lab Supplies y 14950 Getinge Castle 936.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance 14951 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 2,816.10 Pump Supplies 14952 WW Grainger Inc. 3,021.90 Compressor Supplies 14953 Greseby STI 2,106.75 Engine Supplies 14954 Grating Pacific, Inc. 2,444.85 Fiberglass Grating 14955 Graybar Electric Company 2,707.88 Electrical Supplies 14956 Great American Printing Co. 1,267.58 Printing Service 14957 G.W.Maintenance 120.00 Pump Maintenance 14958 David P. Halverson 2,475.00 Computer Loan 14959 Hamilton Company 5,791.13 Lab Supplies 14960 Harcourt Brace 75.70 Publication 14961 Harrington Industrial Plastics 1,320.01 Plumbing Supplies 14962 Harvard Business Review 155.00 Subscription 14963 Hatch 8 Kirk, Inc. 2,156.70 Truck Supplies 14964 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 1,609.91 Compressor Parts 14965 Home Depot 436.07 Small Hardware 14966 Hopkins Technical Products 3,320.30 Pump Supplies 14967 Hub Auto Supply 34.88 Truck Parts 14968 Idexx 167.57 Lab Supplies 14969 Industrial Hearing 8 Pulmonary 6,590.00 On-Site Audiometric Testing 14970 Industrial Threaded Products 141.48 Connectors 11/9198 2:09 PM Page 5 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.xi e Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16198 to 10/31/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14971 Information For Public Affairs 165.00 Online Service 14972 Information Resources 100.00 Personnel Services 14973 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 579.48 Lab Supplies 14974 Inside EPA 1,605.00 Subscription 14975 Interstate Battery Systems 254.07 Batteries 14976 Irvine Ranch Water District 48.10 Water Use 14977 IBM Corporation e57.23 Service Contract 14978 IBM Corporation 6,075.37 Service Contract 14979 IPCO Safety-Ca 667.19 Safety Supplies 14980 ISA 56.00 Publication 14981 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,055.58 Instrument Supplies 14982 Jay's Catering 548.01 Director's Meeting Expense 14983 Jendham, Inc. 338.00 Subscription 14984 Jensen Instruments Co. 3,474.23 Gauge p1 14985 Jobs Available, Inc. 119.80 Notices&Ads rG� 14986 John Lisee Pumps 3,774.47 Pump Supplies 14987 Johnstone Supply 668.67 Electrical Supplies 14988 JLMC, Inc. 2,558.64 Tour Platform Q Trickling Filters 14989 K.P. Undstrom 5,157.75 Envir. Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 14990 Kaman Industrial Technologies 39.53 Mechanical Supplies 14991 Kelar Training Centers 395.00 Registration Fees 14992 Kelly Paper $3.42 Paper 14993 Knox Industrial Supplies 2,294.59 Tools 14994 Lab Safety Supply,lnc. 1,794.69 Safely Supplies 14995 Lab Support 2,475.00 Temporary Employment Services 14996 Law/Crandall 456.00 Soil Testing 7-13-94 14997 Leadership Directories, Inc. 36.00 Subscription 14998 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 6,115.00 Architectural Services 14999 Lustre-Cal 954.63 Safety Supplies 15000 M. E.Silbermann Co. 5,445.65 Sewer Repair 15D01 Maintenance Technology Corp. 389.09 Welding Supplies 15D02 Masune Company 222.75 Safety Supplies 15003 Mc Junkln Corp. 646.50 Plumbing Supplies 15004 McKenna Engineering&Equipment 552.59 Pump Supplies 15005 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,214.38 Tools 15D06 Mattes Griot Optical 849.00 Office Supplies 15007 Mellon Trust 16,083.34 Investment Custodian Bank 15008 Mesa Muffler 348.00 Truck Supplies 11/9/98 2:09 PM Page 8 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.xis Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16198 to 10/31/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15009 Metier, Inc. 9,000.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Data Integration Project 15010 TO Pole CorplMicroAge 3,280.97 Software 15011 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 6,718.38 Mechanical Repairs 15012 Milltronics, Inc. 457.62 Electrical Supplies 15013 Mission Uniform Service 3.932.25 Uniform Rentals 15014 Mission Abrasive Supplies 154.95 Gloves 15015 Monitor Labs, Inc. 1,699.99 Instruments 15016 Peter M. Morrison 617.05 Training Expense Reimb. 15017 Morton Salt 549.63 Salt 15018 Motion Industries 263.15 Pump Supplies 15019 MotoPhoto 48.86 Photographic Services 15020 MGD Technologies, Inc. 1.000.00 Maintenance Agreement 15021 MPS Photographic Services 44.18 Water System Maint.Agreement 15022 Nat West Markets 1,000.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees 15023 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement 15024 National Plant Services, Inc. 13,419.40 Vacuum Truck Services 15025 National Safety Council 500.00 Safety Film Rentals y 15026 National Technology Transfer 3.940.00 Training Registration 15027 Newark Electronics 73.98 Instrument Supplies 15028 Nickey Petroleum Co. Inc. 8,203.82 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 15029 Nico Mak Computing 770.00 Software 15030 NWRI Microfiltration II 195,00 Registration Fees 15031 Once Depot Business Services 2.223.95 Office Supplies 15032 Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 3,290.00 Temporary Employment Services 15033 Robert Ooten 303.23 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15034 Operation Technology, Inc. 994.75 Computer Software 16035 Oracle Corporation 3,857.45 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement 15036 Oxygen Service Company 1,836.91 Specialty Gases 15037 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 144.82 Electrical Supplies 15038 Pacific Bell 2,328.68 Telephone Services 15039 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1.367.08 Plumbing Supplies 15040 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 11,204.65 Instrument Supplies 15041 Padre Janitorial Supplies 241.60 Janitorial Supplies 15042 Pagenet 1,737.76 Pager Services 15043 Parts Unlimited 161.35 Truck Supplies 15044 Pinnacle One 540.00 Registration Fees 15045 Precision Backhoe 985.00 Equipment Rental 15046 Progressive Business Publication 230.00 Subscription 11/9/98 2:09 PM Page 7 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.As Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16/98 to 10131198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15047 Prosum Information Technologies 150.00 Consulting Service-Intranet Frontpage'98 15048 PCS Express 105,00 Courier Service 15049 O Air-Calif. Div. Pump Engineer 786.00 Pump Supplies 15050 R&R Instrumentation, Inc. 62.12 Electrical Supplies 15051 R. L.Abbott&Associates 8,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 15052 Ray Ashworth, C.P.A. 10.00 Refund of Overpayment for Plans&Secifications 15053 Reliastar 23.612.65 Life Insurance Premium 15054 Reliastar Bankers Security Life 13.291.38 Life Insurance Premium 15055 Remedy 4,411.70 Temporary Employment Services 15056 Adrian Renescu 1,247.69 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15057 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 110.00 Auto Repair 15058 RM Controls 38.91 Instrument Supplies 15059 IRS Hughes Co., Inc. 516.17 Paint Supplies 15060 Safety-Kleen 60.00 Service Agreement 15061 Sea Coast Designs, Inc. 39.00 Lab Supplies 15062 City of Seal Beach 178.96 Water Use 15063 Second-Sun 1,098.85 Light Fixtures 15064 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 416.74 Tools 15065 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 4,421.34 Tools/Hardware oD 15066 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 8,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 15087 Sievers 920.50 Lab Supplies 15068 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 168.04 Lab Supplies 15069 Skyline Displays of Orange County 96.98 Halogen Light Set 15070 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 865.91 Plumbing Supplies 15071 Snap-On Incorporated 3e.85 Tools 15072 Southern California Trans Service 10,880.00 Electrical Supplies 15073 Sparkletts 2,131.68 Drinking WaterlCooler Rentals 15074 Specialized Products 1,826.24 Network Test Equipment 15075 Sprint 43.05 Long Distance Telephone Service 15076 Standard and Poors Corp. 2,500.00 COP Contract Service 15077 State Board Of Equalization 208.61 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 15078 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 89e.40 Janitorial Supplies 15079 Summit Steel 4,585.31 Metal 15080 Sunrise Environmental Scientific 200.83 Auto Supplies 15081 Sunset Ford 283.38 Truck Supplies 15082 Super Chem Corporation 870.80 Chemicals 15083 Super Ice Corporation 127.27 Lab Supplies 15084 Super Power Products 371.74 Janitorial Supplies 11/9198 2:09 PM Page 8 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31.98.xls Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16198 to 10131198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15085 Systems Integrated 19,800.00 Construction Services-J-31-3 15086 SARBS-CWEA 30.00 Annual Meeting 15087 SHRM 160.00 Annual Membership Renewal 15088 Teledyne Eletronic Tech. 164.45 Instrument Parts 15089 Foxboro Company 853.38 Instrument Supplies 15090 The Register 1,832.80 Notices 8 Ads 15091 Tomell 6 Cotten 1,278.50 Legal Services 15092 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 103.07 Truck Supplies 15093 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 352.00 Lab Services 15094 Unoca176 13.34 Permit Fee Refund 15095 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,150.54 Plumbing Supplies 15096 Veme's Plumbing 636.80 Plumbing Supplies 15097 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 18,793.41 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 15098 VWR Scientific Products 582.95 Lab Supplies 15099 The Wackenhut Corporation 3,041.52 Security Guards 15100 Water Environment Federation 260.00 Professional Development Courses 15101 Waxie Sanitary Supply 680.66 Janitorial Supplies 15102 Western Metro Unit 599.74 Filters 1p 15103 Moyasar T. Yahya 764.05 Meeting Expense Reimb. `D 15104 Yokogawa Ind.Automation 129.11 Instrument Supplies 15105 3T Equipment Company 168.49 PSI Wire Reinforced Hose 16106 Juan J.Ambriz 253.96 Training Expense Reimb. 15107 Nicholas J.Arhontes 293.27 Training Expense Reimb. 15108 Mark Castillo 1,441.16 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15109 Chloe D. Dao 329.34 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15110 Kevin L. Hadden 1,468.36 Training Expense Reimb. 15111 Donald F. McIntyre 1.705.07 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15112 Kathleen T. Mlllea 504.71 Training Expense Reimb. 15113 Michael D.Moore 1,336.51 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15114 Robed Dolan 1.380.21 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15115 Voided Check - - 15116 Robed C.Thompson 901.49 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15117 Michelle Tuchman 46.05 Cellutar Expense Reimb. 15118 State Board of Equalization 250.00 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 15119 Orange County Sanitation District 892.45 Petty Cash Reimb. 15120 LA Cellular Telephone Company 75.47 Cellular Telephone Service 15121 State Board of Equalization 250.00 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 15122 County of Orange 3,915.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 11/9/98 2:23 PM Page 9 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.x1s Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16198 to 10131/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2.786.625.72 Payroll Disbursements . 11266-11411 Employee Paychecks $ 189,458.48 Biweekly Payroll 10/21/98 11412-11426 Employee Paycheck 2,343.79 Shift Differential Adjustments 11427 Employee Paycheck 241.78 Accrual Payout 31500-31941 Direct Deposit Statements 629,372.91 Biweekly Payroll 10121/98 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 821,416.96 Wire Transfer Payments None r4 Total Claims Paid 10116/98-10131198 $ 3,608,042.68 m H H bJ 0 1119198 2:09 PM Page 10 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.xls BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Toee.ofoir. 2 16, 98 AGENDA REPORTItemNumber Itemgymber Orange County Sanitation District .Y FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CECA FINDINGS N/A \ SWd e�al npd,Pv1nvaonmddaewmRuEama,Mwae.doc Rw,wd. vdana Page 1 ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 11/1/98 -11/15/98 & 11/16/98— 11/30/98. BA mamamtan.p dtaV AT20%hkpaWFILE9cbnm.paid a« ae..ed w a Page 2 AGENDA REPORT TRANSMITTAL FORM _W v As soon as the review of the Agenda Report is complete, call the contact person for pickup. Subject of Agenda Report: Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts Contact: Name: Bill Aldridge Telephone Ext.: 7562 REVISION DATE TO S REVIEWED COMMENTS REQUIRED i 'sion nags a ea Greg Mathews Assistant General Manager/General Manager NWWn Wll Elev�PWFILESW Me Wd= R".W snares Page 3 Claims Paid From 11/01/98 to 1111SMS Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 15123 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. $ 28,245.60 Engineering Services 2.37 15124 Parsons Engineering Science 138,929.89 Engineering Services J-42 15125 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing 69,714.96 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 15126 Global Engineering&Management 46.220.00 Consulting Services-Reinvention 15127 Orange County Sanitation District 381.143.54 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 15128 Southern California Edison 73,357.92 Power 15129 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 15130 Capital Westward 1,851.04 Mechanical Parts 15131 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 11,310.00 Engineering Services Pt-63 15132 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 15133 Corporate Express 4.229.30 Office Supplies 15134 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 15135 Dell Marketing L.P. 7.848.51 6 Monitors for J-25 15136 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 15137 City of Fountain Valley 187.15 Water Use 15138 Franklin Covey Co. 224.61 Office Supplies 15139 Franklin Covey Co. 747.98 Training Registration 15140 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 15141 FM International, Inc. 5,125.00 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System 15142 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 15143 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,774.44 Dues Deduction 15144 CALAFCO 55.00 Registration Fees 16145 Moore&Taber 3,172.60 Equipment Rental 15146 City of Newport Beach 47.98 Water Use 15147 Orange County Family Support 1.188.78 Wage Garnishment 15148 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 15149 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 887.07 Fittings 15150 OCEA 573.37 Dues Deduction 15151 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 15152 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 15153 Peace Officers Council of CA 837.00 Dues Deduction 15164 Pinnacle One 980.00 Registration Fees 15155 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 803.25 Tools 15156 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 1,736.64 ToolslHardware 15157 South Coast Air Quality Mgml. 1,989.20 Permit Fees 15158 Southern California Water 91.26 view Use 15159 State of California 95.42 Hazardous Waste Tax Pagel of 10 a Claims Paid From 111I01198 to 11115198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15160 SCAP 10,574.00 Professional Services-Joint Accidental Release Prevention Program 15161 Thomas Bros. Maps 9,826.80 Printing 15162 Union Dodge 21,321.57 Vehicle Purchased-Dodge Model 1500 Truck 15163 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions 15164 WEF-Registration Dept. 450.00 Registration Fees 15165 Blake Anderson 200.28 Cellular Expense Relnb. 15166 Bradley H. Cagle 183.36 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15167 Barbara A.Collins 586.62 Meeting Expence Reimb. 16168 Danny S. Evangelista 888.75 Training Expense Reimb. 15169 Victor R. Hermelin 146.71 Training Expense Raimb. 15170 Lary J.Jones 146.71 Training Expense Reimb. 15171 Frank R. Steiger 688.74 Training Expense Reimb. 15172 Mahin Talebi 649.60 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15173 Advanco Constructors Inc. 101.723.40 Construction J-34-1, P2-35.5 15174 Cytec Industries Inc. 30,753.75 Inspection Services 15175 Dell Marketing L.P. 44.415.63 PowerEdge 6300 Server for Data Warehouse Project 15176 Delta Dental 38,675.92 Dental Insurance Plan 15177 Dupont Engineered Services 37,317.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98 15178 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 188,722.35 Construction 7-17 15179 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 96,276.02 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 15180 Mike Prlich&Sons 42,603.00 Construction 3-35R-1 15181 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. 646,961.25 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 15182 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 113,885.19 Construction Contract#2.40 15183 Oracle Corporation 37,397.87 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement 15184 Orange County Water District 43,275.60 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 15185 Pacificere of Ca 37.367.80 Health Insurance Premium 16186 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 29.244.05 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 15187 Realtime Systems Corporation 47,000.D0 Integration&Support Services 15188 Shasta Electric LP 29,520.00 Construction J-31-2 15189 Southern California Edison 45,D62.56 Power 15190 Tula RanchlMagan Farms 46,824.73 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 15191 United Healthcare I Matra Health 144.001.91 Medical Health Insurance 15192 The Vantage Group LLC 18,698.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 15193 American Telephone&Telegraph 1.79 Long Distance Telephone Services 15194 American Telephone&Telegraph 1,803.69 Long Distance Telephone Services 15195 American Telephone&Telegraph 4.85 Long Distance Telephone Services 15196 Accountants Overload 795.60 Temporary Employment Services 15197 Aidco Systems,Inc. 458.76 Engine Supplies Page 2 of 10 Claims Paid From 11101198 to 11/15/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15198 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 22,894.98 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8.8-89 15199 Airborne Express 166.25 Air Freight 15200 Allied Packing&Rubber, Inc. 163.78 Mechanical Supplies 15201 American Digital Technologies, Inc. 1,688.00 On-Site Training 15202 American National Standards, Inc. 94.00 Publication&Books 15203 American Sigma, Inc. 1,724.42 Mechanical Supplies 15204 American Training Resources, Inc. 915.88 Training Materials 15205 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 631.00 Lab Supplies 15206 Angel Scientific Products, Inc. 733.31 Lab Supplies 15207 Anicom, Inc. 1.507.60 Electrical Pads&Supplies 15208 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 675.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 15209 Appleone Employment Service 2.397.00 Temporary Employment Services 15210 Applied Industrial Technology 603.12 Pump Supplies 15211 Arizona Instrument 1,308.96 Instrument Supplies 15212 Armor-Vac 455.00 Vacuum Truck Services 15213 Art's Disposal Service, Inc. 1,241.60 Toxic Waste Removal 15214 Voided Check - - 15215 Action Door Repair Corp. 610.97 Door Repairs 15216 AWSI 359.00 D.O.T.Training Program 15217 Bailey Fischer&Porter Company 159.85 Electrical Supplies 15218 Baker Process 1,063.49 Mechanical Supplies 15219 Banana Blueprint, Inc. 210.12 Printing MO 11-7-94 15220 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 1,690.03 Telephone Installation 15221 Battery Specialties 104.22 Batteries 15222 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobett Crafts) 98.75 Once Supplies 15223 BioSource Consulting 5.087.46 Consulting Servicce-Biosolids&Watershed 15224 Bloomberg L.P. 5.268.98 Financial Monitoring MO4-14-93 15225 Blossoms n'Balloons 277.44 CNG Dedication Ceremony 15226 Breezer Construction 4,169.62 Pump Supplies 15227 Brenner-Fiedler&Assoc, Inc. 315.92 Generators 15228 Bristol Systems, Inc. 19,200.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 15229 Brithinee Electric 1,589.87 Electrical Supplies 15230 Budget Janitorial, Inc. 8,110.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94 15231 Burke Engineering Co. 1,224.73 Electrical Supplies 15232 Bush&Associates, Inc. 17,060.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 15233 BuyComp 1,208.15 Computer Supplies 15234 BNI Building News 365.73 Subscription 15235 C.S.I1.F. Foundation 8,757.00 Professional Services Page 3 of 10 r Claims Paid From 11/01/98 to 11/15/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15236 California Environmental Controls, Inc. 458.78 Electrical Parts&Supplies 15237 California Automatic Gate 90.00 Vans MO 5-28-97 15238 Calolympic Safety 666.22 Safety Supplies 15239 Canus Corporation 6,290.00 Fiber Optic Cable 15240 Capitol Enquiry, Inc. 131.02 Publication 15241 Carl Warren&Co. 1.368.36 Insurance Claims Administrator 15242 Carollo Engineers 6.712-69 Engineering Services-Pl-38, P243, MO 4-14-93 15243 Charles P.Crowley Co. 370.11 Instrument Parts 152" Chemsearch 164.13 Janitorial Supplies 15245 Chem-Dry Of Huntington Beach 50.00 Carpet Cleaning 15246 Cincinnati Incorporated 16.57 Conference Registration 15247 City of Costa Mesa 220.00 Service Contract-Fairview Road Rehabilitation 15248 Coast Fire Equipment 676.14 Service Agreement 15249 Color Arts, Inc. 3.126.79 Vehicle Decals 15250 Communications Performance Gro 9.600.00 Professional Services 15251 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 3,791.46 Electrical Supplies 15252 Consolidated Freightways 107.66 Freight 15253 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 567.17 Plumbing Supplies 15254 Continental-McLaughlin 545.58 Tools 15255 Converse Consultants 9,843.60 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 15256 Cooper Cameron Corporation 21,093.36 Engine Supplies 15257 Corporate Express 171.99 Office Supplies 15258 Cost Containment Solutions 92.04 Worker's Comp. Services 15259 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 109.04 Truck Parts 15260 CHEMetrics, Inc. 45.12 Registration Fees 15261 CNA Trust 11,302.60 Construction 541-1 15262 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 405.16 Lab Supplies 15263 CR& R Incorporated 1,260.00 Container Rentals 15264 Dapper Tire Co. 502.24 Truck Tires 15265 Del Mar Analytical 380.00 Biosolids Analysis 15266 Delta Foam Products 161.63 Lab Supplies 15267 DeZurick 7,474.59 Valves 15268 Diamond H Recognition 1.250.80 Service Awards 15269 Dover Elevator Company 1.203.60 Elevator Maintenance 15270 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 618.50 Paint Supplies 15271 DGA Consultants, Inc. 3.312.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 15272 Electra Bond, Inc. 6,524.26 Mechanical Supplies 15273 EDSG: Environmental Data Solutions Grp. 23,336.00 Professional Services-Air Quality Info. Mgmt. Sys. Implementation Project Page 4 of 10 Claims Paid From 11/01/98 to 11/15198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15274 ENS Resources, Inc. 5,427.18 Professional Services 15275 Fairbanks Scales, Inc. 516.23 Service Agreement 15276 Federal Express Corp. 48.35 Air Freight 15277 Fibertron 1.023.46 Fiber Optic Cable 15278 Finnigan Corp. 1,289.77 Service Agreement 15279 First Fire Systems, Inc. 8,554.33 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-25-98 15280 Fisher Scientific 1,283.80 Lab Supplies 15281 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 220.00 Concrete Cuffing 15282 Flo-Systems, Inc. 65.38 Pump Supplies 15283 Forked Engineering 8 Surveying, Inc. 5.009.20 Engineering Services P-150 15284 Fountain Valley Camera 203.99 Photo Supplies 15285 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 178.28 Paint Supplies 15286 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 292.50 Truck Wash Tickets 15287 City of Fountain Valley 1,362.40 Water Use 15288 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering 200.42 Paint Supplies 16289 Fry's Electronics 283.32 Computer Supplies 15290 FLW Inc. 586.80 Electrical Supplies 15291 Garrett-Callahan Company 4,467.86 Chemicals 15292 General Binding Corporation 382.36 Printing 15293 GTE California 1,664.38 Telephone Services 15294 George T. Hall Co. 171.80 Electrical Supplies 15295 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 5,550.38 Pump Supplies 15296 W W Grainger Inc. 2,509.50 Compressor Supplies 16297 Gmseby STI 134.66 Engine Supplies 15298 Grating Pacific Inc. 2,383.43 Fiberglass Grating 15299 Graybar Electric Company 2,191.60 Electrical Supplies 15300 Great American Printing Co. 401.72 Printing Service 15301 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 548.95 Janitorial Supplies 15302 Hamilton Company 220.78 Lab Supplies 15303 Harbour Engineering Group 11.438.54 Mechanical Pads 15304 Harcourt Brace 8 Co.and Subsidiaries 75.70 Publication 15305 Voided Check - - 15306 Harvard Business Review 85.00 Subscription 15307 Gerald E. Hasenstab 102.92 Insurance Refund 15308 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery 8 Deli 76.40 Training Expense for Catering-Div 720 8 730 15309 Herman Miller 254.29 Once Supplies 15310 Hewlett-Packard 1,540.63 Service Agreement 15311 Hilton, Famkopf 8 Hobson, LLC 6.178.75 Consulting Services-Office Support Study Page 5 of 10 - Claims Paid From 11/01/98 to 11/15/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15312 Hoerbiger Service Inc. 2,649.22 Compressor Parts 15313 The Holman Group 735.56 Employee Assistance Program Premium 15314 Home Depot 548.70 Small Hardware - 15315 Hugh Dean Company 268.27 Mechanical Supplies 15316 City of Huntington Beach 16.610.55 Water Use 15317 Ideal Scanners&Systems 925.00 Software 15318 Imaging Plus, Inc. 1,500.00 Office Supplies 15319 Information For Public Affairs 165.00 Online Service 15320 Inland Empire Equipment, Inc. 400.04 Truck Supplies 15321 IDM Controls, Inc. 10,057.53 Equipment Repair 15322 IPCO Safety-Ca 1,845.20 Safety Supplies 15323 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 829.35 Instrument Supplies 15324 J.W. D'Angelo Co, Inc. 138.90 Building Materials 15325 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 6.300.00 Professional Services 15326 Jay's Catering 3.369.83 Catering Services for Various Meetings 15327 Jobtrak 162.00 Registration Fees 15328 Johnstone Supply 173.44 Electrical Supplies 15329 J2 Printing Services 524.74 Printing 15330 Kelly Paper 7.96 Paper 15331 Kimmede Bros., Inc. 2.550.09 Mechanical Parts 15332 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,977.46 Tools 15333 Lakewood Publications 78.00 Subscription 15334 LaserAll Corp. 8.744.99 Service Agreement 15335 LaMothe Company 48.52 Sulfide Test Kit 15336 Lee&Ro, Inc. 231.00 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 15337 Lexis-Nexis 350.00 Subscription 15338 Liebert Corporation 3,276.61 Electrical Supplies 15339 Line-X Protective Coatings 391.63 Truck Supplies 15340 Liquid Handling Systems 1.079.58 Mechanical Supplies 15341 Los Angeles Galvanizing Company 161.63 Galvanize Gap Plates 15342 Los Angeles Times 1.057.04 Notices&Ads 15343 LA Cellular Telephone Company 1,799.71 Cellular Telephone Service 16344 Voided Check - - 15345 Matt Chlor, Inc. 568.20 Ferric Chloride Supplies 15346 McCollister's Moving&Storage 859.57 Registration Fees 15347 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 2,939.41 Tools 15348 Mechanical Drives Co. 114.64 Electrical Supplies 15349 Medlin Controls Co. 1.454.22 Instrument Supplies Page 6 of 10 Claims Paid From 11101/98 to 11115198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15350 Mesa Muf0er 52.24 Truck Supplies 15351 Metier, Inc. 2,400.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Data Integration Project 15352 Micro Flex 608.00 Gloves 15353 Tri Pole CorplMicroAge 1,623.58 Software 15354 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 2,039.60 Mechanical Repairs 15355 Mission Abrasive Supplies 204.71 Gloves 15356 Mission Uniform Service 4,266.05 Uniform Rentals 15357 Monitor Labs Inc. 1,814.84 Instruments 15358 Moreland&Associates 1,664.75 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 15359 Motion Industries 141.91 Pump Supplies 15360 MotoPhoto 63.14 Photographic Services 15361 Municipal Maintenance Equipment 917.18 Mechanical Repairs 15362 MPS Photographic Services 5.93 Photographic Services 15363 National Seminars Group 295.00 Seminar Registration 15364 Neal Supply Co. 311.65 Plumbing Supplies 15365 Newark Electronics 147.96 Instrument Supplies 15366 North American Crane Bureau, Inc. 1.590.00 Equipment Training Course 15367 Once Depot Business Services 1,272.18 Orrice Supplies 15368 Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 1,120.00 Temporary Employment Services 15369 Orange County Sanitation District 15,254.93 Workers Comp. Reimb. 15370 Orange Coast Petroleum Equipment 619.56 Fuel Noule 16371 Orange County Fan Supply 61.55 Chemicals 15372 Orange County Industrial Plastics 30.17 Plastic Sheets 15373 Orange County Wholesale Electric 1,838.01 Instrument Supplies 15374 Orrick, Herrington&Sutcliffe 2,000.00 Professional Services 15375 Oxygen Service Company 2.721.38 Specialty Gases 15376 Ol Analytical 176.02 Lab Supplies 15377 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 63.66 Electrical Supplies 15378 Pacific Bell 1,233.17 Telephone Services 15379 Pacific Bell Internet Services 2,303.00 Internet Services 15380 Pacific Mechanical Supply 94.18 Plumbing Supplies 15381 Padre Janitorial Supplies 110.10 Janitorial Supplies 15382 Pagenet 1,806.49 Rental Equipment 15383 Parker Hannifin Corporation 663.87 Mechanical Supplies 15384 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 301.28 Tres 15385 Pads Unlimited 372.36 Truck Supplies 15386 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 6.269.40 Filters 15387 PCI: Poly-Cart Industries 21.55 Janitorial Supplies Page 7 of 10 r - Claims Paid From 11/01198 to 11/16198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15388 Power Distributors, Inc. 24,300.00 Lighting Fixtures Installation 15389 Presidium Inc. 2.083.33 Worker's Comp. Claims Admin. 15390 Prosum Information Technologies 75.00 Consulting Service-Intranet Frontpage'98 15391 Public Risk Management Assoc. 220.00 Membership 15392 Putzmeister, Inc. 15,119.94 Pump Supplies 15393 PCS Express 105.00 Courier Service 15394 R. L.Abbott&Associates 12,103.68 Professional Services-Kern County Biosolids 15395 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,443.61 Trash Removal 15396 Ramada Plaza Hotel 441.70 Registration Fees 15397 LEllen Ray 498.83 Cash Advance for Mobile Crane Training 15398 Realtime Systems Corporation 1,275.85 Integration&Support Services 15399 Realtime Systems Corporation 2,000.00 Integration&Support Services 15400 Red Wing Shoes 169.37 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 15401 Reliastar 8,096.00 Life Insurance Premium 15402 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 5,167.72 Life Insurance Premium 15403 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 1,012.85 Metal 15404 RJN Group, Inc. 11,199.25 CMMS Consulting Services 15405 RPM Electric Motors 134.69 Electric Motor Supplies 15406 IRS Hughes Co., Inc. 48.24 Paint Supplies 15407 Safety-Kleen 6,459.00 Service Agreement 15408 SantaFe Industrial Products 6.70 Mechanical Supplies 15409 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,631.17 Specialty Gases 15410 Seagate Software 3,781.25 Training Fee 15411 Second-Sun 799.54 Light Fixtures 15412 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 363.27 Tools 15413 Sheshuno8 284.95 Registration Fees 15414 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,663.67 Tools/Hardware 15415 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 195.62 Lab Supplies 15416 Sloan Electric Company 15,162.84 Motor Repairs 15417 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 249.44 Plumbing Supplies 15418 So. Cal. Gas Company 6.802.33 Natural Gas 15419 Soco-Lynch Corp. 714.13 Janitorial Services 15420 Southern California Edison 5,998.03 Power 15421 Southern California Trans Service 362.05 Electrical Supplies 15422 Southwest Scientific Inc. 533.36 Instrument Supplies 15423 Specialized Equipment Systems 5,000.00 Mechanical Supplies 15424 Strata International, Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 15425 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 6,804.25 Landscape Maint. Page 8 of 10 Claims Paid From 11/01/98 to 11115/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15426 Taylor-Dunn 86.04 Electric Cart Parts 15427 Technet 774.73 Publication 15428 Technic Computer Service Corp. 646.84 Printer Maintenance 15429 Tekmar Company 291.85 Cable 15430 Textile Engineering Associates 1.640.44 Electrical Supplies 15431 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,321.16 Mechanical Supplies 15432 Time Warner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 15433 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 92.63 Locks& Keys 15434 Tomell&Cotten 2,589.30 Legal Services 15435 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 1,976.64 Truck Supplies 15436 Two Wheels One Planet 41.96 Bicycle Supplies 15437 TEKsystems 880.00 Registration Fees 15438 The Unisource Corporation 857.76 Office Supplies 15439 United Parcel Service 606.83 Parcel Services 15440 United Rent-All 1.265.35 Misc. Rentals for the CNG Dedication Ceremony 15441 United States Filter Corp. 1,262.75 Filters 15442 Valcom 2,872.77 Software 15443 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,716.96 Plumbing Supplies 15444 Veme's Plumbing 762.09 Plumbing Supplies 15445 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,467.60 Vision Service Premium 15446 Vortex Corp. 369.95 Door Maint. For Human Resources Bldg. 15447 VWR Scientific Products 9,600.74 Lab Supplies 15448 The Wackenhut Corporation 12,166.08 Security Guards 15449 Water Environment Federation 75.25 Professional Development Courses 15450 Waters Corporation 1.154.39 Service Agreement 15451 Wayne Electric Co. 638.96 Electrical Supplies 15452 Wells Supply Co. 3,180.46 Registration Fees 15453 Western Business Systems 638.35 Office Supplies 15454 Western States Chemical, Inc. 18,042.43 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 15455 Whatman, Inc. 332.13 Registration Fees 15456 WEF-Registration Dept. 450.00 Registration Fees 15457 Xerox Corporation 17,511.68 Copier Leases 15458 YCA&Associates 5,565.00 Project Management Training Seminar Registration Fees 15459 Zemarc Corp. 500.00 Training Expense 15460 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 24.408.00 Construction 7-7-1 15461 Emilio Ariston 169.80 Training Expense Reimb. 15462 Kelly J.Christensen 434.75 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15463 Jerry F. Evangelista 559.59 Meeting Expense Reimb. Page 9 of 10 r - Claims Paid From 11/01/98 to 11/16198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15464 Daniel C. Fontela 169.80 Training Expense Reimb. 15465 Roy A. Handy 169.80 Training Expense Reimb. 15466 Gerald R.Jones 298.18 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15467 Alan D. Ralph 169.80 Training Expense Reimb. 15468 Merrill F. Seiler 425.75 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15469 Stuart D. Severn 1,648.83 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15470 Michelle Tuchman 627.44 Training Expense Reimb. 15472 David A. Ludwin 2,923.73 Employee Computer Loan Program 15473 Orange County Sanitation District 617.13 Petty Cash Reimb. 15474 County of Orange 2,295.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 15475 City of Huntington Beach 50.00 Water Use 15476 City of Huntington Beach 7,913.48 Permit Fee-Job No. P2-65 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 3,376,507.41 Payroll Disbursements 11428A 1570 Employee Paychecks $ 182,680.16 Biweekly Payroll 11/4/98 11575-11585 Employee Paychecks 133,469.36 Termination Payoffs 11728-11748 Directors'Paychecks 5,362.18 Payroll 11/13/98 32000-32437 Direct Deposit Statements 605,236.57 Biweekly Payroll 1114198 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 926,748.27 Wire Transfer Payments Texas Commerce Bank $ 149.661.24 November Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Texas Commerce Bank 222,727.39 November Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits State Street Bank 8 Trust 182,040.13 November Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 554,428.76 Total Claims Paid 1111/98-1111W08 $ 4,856,684.44 Page 10 of 10 Claims Paid From 11116198 to 11/30198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 15477 Orange County Sanitation District $ 428,814.69 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 15478 American Airlines 8,218.41 Travel Services 15479 Anicom, Inc. 71.75 Electrical Parts& Supplies 15480 ABB Industrial Systems, Inc. 4,147.35 Instrument Supplies 15481 Assoc.of Metro.Sewerage Agencies 16,500.00 AMSA Membership Dues 15482 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 15483 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 15484 Computers America, Inc. 1,146.25 Computer Supplies 15485 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 15486 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 15487 Diehl, Evans&Co., LLP 270.00 Seminar Registration 15488 Dr. G.Fred Lee&Associates 25.00 Registration Fees 15489 Employers Group 98.00 Registration Fees 15490 Employment Development Dept. 464.00 Unemployment Insurance 15491 Flo-Systems, Inc. 1,112.39 Pump Supplies 15492 Franchise Tax Board 55.00 Wage Garnishment 15493 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 15494 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples 15495 Inside EPA 595.00 Subscription 15496 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 Wage Garnishment 15497 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,774.44 Dues Deduction 15498 Jordan Controls, Inc. 51 A3 Electrical Parts&Supplies 15499 LA Cellular Telephone Company 431.67 Cellular Telephone Service 15500 LRP Publications 366.50 Subscription 15501 Maintenance Technology Corp. 3,973.18 Welding Supplies 15502 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 192.41 Tools 15503 Network Associates 12,174.10 Antivirus Software- 2Year Renewal 15504 Oracle Corporation 624.95 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement 15505 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 15506 Orange County Marshal 55.00 Wage Garnishment 15507 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 159.95 Fittings 15508 OCEA 582.62 Dues Deduction 15509 Pacific Bell Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Services 15510 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 15511 Panametrics 370.35 Meter 15512 Court Order 296.DD Wage Garnishment 15513 Peace Officers Council of CA 837.00 Dues Deduction Page 1 of 12 Claims Paid From 11/16/98 to 11/30/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15514 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 62.18 Tools 15515 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,776.70 Tools/Hardware 15516 Stemon, Larsen&Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 15517 Voided Check 0.00 - 15518 State of California 95.42 Hazardous Waste Tax 15519 Ten Hoeve Bros., Inc. 129.60 Safely Supplies 15520 Tomell&Cotten 354.40 Legal Services 15521 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions 15522 UMI 61.96 Publications&Books 15523 Valley Cities Supply Company 392.10 Plumbing Supplies 15524 Ruth Gomez 1.049.95 Training Expense Reimb. 15525 Rick J. Hannappel 629.65 Training Expense Reimb. 15526 David R. Heinz 241.58 Meeting Expence Reimb. 15527 Robert C.Thompson 726.11 Meeting Expense Remit. 15528 Barclays Bank PLC 91,069.55 COP Letter of Credit 15529 Carollo Engineers 131,561.97 Engineering Services-P1-38, P2.43,MO 4-14-93 15530 Cooper Cameron Corporation 29,293.98 Engine Supplies 15531 Dell Marketing L.P. 72.397.40 12 Dell P6400 Computer Workstations& 1 Dell 6300 Server 15532 Delta Dental 38,791.24 Dental Insurance Plan 15533 Holmes&Narver, Inc. 45,778.27 Engineering Services 241 15534 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 46,609.88 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 15535 Lee&Ro, Inc. 31,792.01 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-94 15536 Painewebber Incorporated 59,521.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 15537 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 158,893.73 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 15538 Polydyne,Inc. 31,922.40 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 15539 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 42.660.00 Landscape Improvements @ Plants 1 &2 15540 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 86,435.69 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 15541 Woodruff, Spradlin&Smart 99,989.69 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 15542 First Fire Systems, Inc. 28,937.51 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-25-98 15543 Margate Construction, Inc. 234,071.00 Construction Pt-36-2 15544 Pave West 154,545.30 Construction P1 40-3 15545 Systems Integrated 42.408.00 Construction Services-J-31-3 15546 A&G Electropolish 343.90 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15547 American Telephone&Telegraph 1.35 Long Distance Telephone Services 15548 A-1 All American Roofing 2,750.00 Re-Roof Power Building at Plant 2 15549 Abrasive Engineering Tool&Equip. 956.22 Hardware 15550 Aidco Systems, Inc. 3,305.41 Engine Supplies 15551 Air Liquids America Corporation 1,860.75 Specialty Gasses Page 2 of 12 Claims Paid From 11/16/98 to 11/30/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15552 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 13.64 Lab Supplies 15553 Airborne Express 51.40 Air Freight 15564 Alamo Motor Lodge 434.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15555 Albertson's 9620 872.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15556 Court Order 425.00 Wage Garnishment 15557 Allied Electronics, Inc. 156.32 Electrical Supplies 15558 Allied Pacific 2.770.02 Photographic Services 15559 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 1,173.01 Mechanical Supplies 15560 Allied Supply Company 2.888.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 15561 American National Standards, Inc. 375.00 Publications&Books 15562 Anaheim Convention Center 145.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15563 Anaheim Motel Ltd. 1.505.02 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15564 Anaheim Terrace Care Center 1,215.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15565 Andrews Glass Co. 510.70 Lab Supplies 15566 Anixter, Inc. 68.18 Computer Supplies 15567 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. 315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 15568 Appleone Employment Service 7,905.87 Temporary Employment Services 15569 Applied Industrial Technology 5.88 Pump Supplies 15570 Annor-Vac 1,605.50 Vacuum Truck Services 15571 Asbury Environmental Services 335.00 Waste Oil Removal 15572 OuickseUAssociated Concrete Prod. 452.55 Building Materials 15573 Associated Vacuum Tech., Inc. 136.17 Filter 15574 Astech/MCI Manufacturing 3.417.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15575 Atlantic Pool Care 705.00 Service Agreement 15576 ADCOA 214.90 Electrical Parts&Supplies 15577 AAF International 1,278.98 Mechanical Supplies 15578 APEX Communications 3,285.51 Communication Equipment Upgrade 15579 AWSI 156.00 D.O.T.Training Program 15580 Steward Realty Management 187.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15581 Baker's Square#0522 164.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15582 Balboa Pavilion 189.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15583 Banana Blueprint, Inc. 4,336.19 Printing MO 11-7-94 15584 Bandera Estates 109.99 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15585 Battery Specialties 54.23 Batteries 15586 Beacon Bay Enterprises 462.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15587 Belair Motor Hotel 892.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16688 Ben Franklin Crafts(Bobeft Crafts) 98.75 Office Supplies 15589 Bender&Assoc. 199.00 Registration Fee Page 3 of 12 - Claims Paid From 11/16198 to 11/30/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15590 Benlly Nevada Corporation 1,235.50 Instrument Supplies 15591 Best Western Plaza International 1.118.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15592 Dept of Parks 8 Recreation 469.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15593 Boot Bam 96.87 Reimbumeable Safety Shoes 15594 Bristol Systems, Inc. 9,600.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 15595 Brown And Caldwell 2.196.70 Engineering Services Res 93-101 15596 Buena Vista Convalescent Hospital 488.80 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15597 Burke Engineering Co. 948.83 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 15598 Bush 8 Associates, Inc. 8,288.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 15599 BC Wire Rope 8 Rigging 151.74 Rope 15600 Calif. Centrifugal Pump 580.00 Electrical Services 15601 California Auto Collision 415.62 Repair Kits 15602 California Auto Refrigeration 341.66 Service Agreement 15603 California Automatic Gate 657.68 Service Agreement 15604 California Custom Shapes,Inc. 1,847.26 Photographic Services 15605 California Relocation Services 156.00 Moving Services 15606 California Trailer Park 631.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15607 Calolympic Safely 64.15 Safety Supplies 15608 Caltrol, Inc. 18,180.69 Valves 15609 Candy Cane Motel 1.113.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15610 Canus Corporation 648.03 Fiber Optic Cable 15611 Care Enterprises West 148.69 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15612 Catalina Cylinders 120.10 Janitorial Supplies 15613 Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers 6.240.00 Engineering Services PI-63 15614 Charles P. Crowley Co. 667.69 Instrument Parts 15615 City Office Furniture, Inc. 370.61 Office Supplies 15616 Clean Source 144.39 Janitorial Supplies 15617 Coast Fire Equipment 958.90 Service Agreement 15618 Coco's#127 167.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15619 Communications Performance Group 9,090.00 Professional Services-Hazardous Energy Control Program 15620 Computers America, Inc. 451.59 Computer Supplies 15621 Connell GM Parts 34.17 Truck Supplies 15622 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 10,165.42 Electrical Supplies 15623 Continental-McLaughlin 149.46 Tools 15624 Converse Consultants 3,299.50 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 15625 Copelco Capital, Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease 15626 Corporate Express 3019 Office Supplies 15627 County of Orange 455.00 Permit Fees Page 4 of 12 Claims Paid From 11/16/98 to 11/30/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15628 County Investments 11 445.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15629 County Wholesale Electric Co. 3,486.51 Electrical Supplies 15630 Crazy Shirts, Inc. 919.67 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15631 Crest Coatings#2 210.17 Photographic Services 15632 Culligan Water Conditioning 30.00 Soft Water Service 15633 Cypress Park Community Church 512.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15634 CAPIO 125.00 Subscription 15635 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 2.573.07 Lab Supplies 15636 CSMFO 712.00 Notices&Ads 15637 Danco Metal Surfacing 510.34 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15638 Datavault 101.50 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage 15639 Del Mar Analytical 492.00 Biosolids Analysis 15640 Del Taco#26 31.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15641 Denny's Inc.#154 279.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15642 Denny's Restaurant#1205 283.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15643 Denny's Restaurant#136 726.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15644 Denny's Restaurant 91509 566.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15645 DeZurick 8,138.35 Valves 15646 Discount Camper 615.94 Truck Supplies 15647 Don-A-Vee Jeep Eagle of Placentia 21,446.56 Jeep Wrangler 15648 Dover Elevator Company 1,017.00 Elevator Maintenance 15649 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 319.08 Paint Supplies 15650 DGA Consultants, Inc. 16,506.66 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 15651 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 35.00 Medical Screening 15652 Electra Bond, Inc. 2,074.18 Mechanical Supplies 15653 Electronic Specialties 41.43 Electrical Supplies 15654 Enchanter, Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 15655 Environmental Resources Associates 987.60 Lab Services 15656 Expertune 3,510.00 Mechanical Supplies 15657 Exquisite Design 16.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15658 ENS Resources, Inc. 2,243.29 Professional Services 15659 Family Restaurant#227 733.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15660 Farquhar Investment Group 105.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15661 Federal Express Corp. 64.50 Air Freight 15662 Ferguson Sales, Inc. 275.05 Mechanical Supplies 15663 Fibenron 3,858.84 Fiber Optic Cable 15664 Finnigan Corp 297.09 Service Agreement 15665 First American Real Estate Solutions 2,220.34 Orange County Property Information Subscription Page 5 of 12 r Claims Paid From 11116198 to 11130/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15666 Fisher Scientific 712.77 Lab Supplies 15667 Flexible Metal Hose Manufacturing 542.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15668 Flomax Products, Inc. 535.22 Valve Supplies 15669 Fluke Corporation 21,097.26 Electrical Supplies 15670 Flynn Signs&Graphics, Inc. 443.82 Signs 15671 Fortis Benefits Insurance Comp 17,504.75 Long Term Disability Premium 15672 Fountain Valley Camera 29.55 Photo Supplies 15673 Fountain Valley Florist 59.26 Benevolence Flowers 15674 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 193.95 Paint Supplies 15675 City of Fountain Valley 12,663.68 Water Use 15676 Franklin Covey 101.04 Office Supplies 15677 Fritz That's Too 677.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15678 Frontier Motel 177.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15679 Fry's Electronics 114.13 Computer Supplies 15680 FM International, Inc. 500.00 Service Agreement-RFP for the Engineering Document Mgmt System 15681 Ganahl Lumber Company 470.61 Lumber/Hardware 15682 Garden Park Care Center 528.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15883 Gamatt-Callahan Company 30.17 Chemicals 15684 GTE California 7,668.42 Telephone Services 15685 George Jones 37.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15686 Goldenwest Window Service 1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service 15687 WW Grainger, Inc. 362.72 Compressor Supplies 15688 Graybar Electric Company 241.36 Electrical Supplies 15689 Grove Investment Company 154.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15690 The Grove Motel 301.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15691 Haaker Equipment Company 402.22 Truck Supplies 15692 Hamilton Company 78.61 Lab Supplies 15693 Harvard Business Review 85.00 Subscription 15694 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli 32.00 Catering Services-Pastries 15695 Hilbert&Associates, Inc. 17,495.00 Engineering Services P2-61 15696 Hilt!, Inc. 3,129.88 Tools 15697 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 58.49 Compressor Parts 15698 Holiday Inn Express 923.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15699 Home Depot 162.91 Small Hardware 15700 Hub Auto Supply 283.06 Truck Parts 15701 Hubbell Family,LLC 401.73 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15702 Hyatt Newporter 3,201.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15703 HUB Construction Specialties 257.38 Tools Page 6 of 12 Claims Paid From 11/16/98 to 11/30/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15704 Idexx 1,002.58 Lab Supplies 15706 Imaging Plus, Inc. 1,190.44 Office Supplies 15706 In-N-Out Burger, Store#24 248.58 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15707 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 23.30 Connectors 15708 Intergraph Corporation 3,135.53 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 15709 International E-Z Up 3,344.76 Safety Supplies 15710 Interstate Battery Systems 974.22 Batteries 15711 Irvine Ranch Water District 48.74 Water Use 15712 IBM Corporation 6.075.37 IBM AS/400 Lease 15713 IPCO Safety-Ca 1.160.17 Safety Supplies 15714 ISA 249.00 Publication 15715 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 7,289.10 Instrument Supplies 15716 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Co. 1,000.00 FIS Training 15717 Jay's Catering 839.77 Catering Services 15718 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,945.33 Tools 15719 La Quints Inn#541 2.458.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15720 Labware, Inc. 4,500.00 Lab Information Management System Software MO 2-26-97 15721 LaserAll Corp. 1,329.47 Service Agreement 15722 Law/Crandall 13,232.30 Soil Testing 7-13-94 15723 Leach Corp. 710.58 Water System Maint.Agreement 15724 Lewco Electric Co. 118.53 Truck Supplies 15725 Long Beach Line-X 1,741.90 Truck Supplies 15728 LA Fitness Anaheim, Inc. 2,985.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15727 LNP Engineering Plastics,Inc. 2,884.89 Office Supplies 15728 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. 2,868.38 Engineering Services 2-37 15729 Madrid Motel 180.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15730 Mag Systems 853.38 Electrical Supplies 15731 Maintenance Products, Inc. 2,649.10 Mechanical Supplies 15732 Mc Junkin Corp. 984.30 Plumbing Supplies 15733 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,401.29 Tools 15734 McWelco Rack-N-Box Co. 409.45 Auto Parts 8 Supplies 15735 Medlin Controls Co. 92.81 Instrument Supplies 15736 Micro Flex 608.00 Gloves 15737 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. 4,890.00 Mechanical Repairs 15738 Mighty Mover Trailers, Inc. 12,965.55 Safety Supplies 15739 Mission Uniform Service 2.228.82 Uniform Rentals 15740 Monitor Labs, Inc. 1.461.23 Instruments 15741 Monitor Plating 1.449.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 7 of 12 v ., Claims Paid From 11N8198 to 11/30/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15742 Motel #1258.1-C 3,219.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15743 Motion Industries 266.11 Pump Supplies 15744 MotoPhoto 89.31 Photographic Services 15745 MPS Photographic Services 16.16 Photographic Services 15746 Nasco 330.90 Lab Supplies 16747 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement 15748 Neal Supply Co. 282.42 Plumbing Supplies 15749 Network Associates, Inc. 14,045.52 Software License Fees 15750 Newport Beach Inn 530.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15751 Newport Center Medical,Building#3 2,063.94 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15752 Newport-Costa Mesa YMCA 65.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15753 Nextel Communications 755.15 Cellular Phones 8 Air Time 15754 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 760.52 LubricantlDlesel Fuel 15755 NAB Associates, Inc. 1,060.00 Lab Services 15756 O'Donnel Oil Co. 86.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 16757 Office Depot Business Services 6,022.10 Office Supplies 15758 Old Spaghetti Factory 121.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15759 Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 1,120.00 Temporary Employment Services 15760 Olympus America, Inc. 1,200.34 Computer Supplies 15761 Orange County Fair 8 Expo 7,172.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15762 Orange County Wholesale Electric 1.150.23 Instrument Supplies 15763 Orange Tree Motel 715.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15764 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 342.24 Fittings 15785 Oxygen Service Company 1,684.34 Specially Gases 15766 OCB Reprographics 221.53 Printing Service-Spec#P-173 15767 OI Analytical 91.59 Lab Supplies 15768 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 177.27 Electrical Supplies 15769 Pacific Bell 1,259.22 Telephone Services 15770 Pacific Haven Convalescent Home 1,319.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15771 Pacific Mechanical Supply 88.07 Plumbing Supplies 15772 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 4,934.89 Instrument Supplies 15773 Pacifica Aerospace Corp. 516.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15774 Padre Janitorial Supplies 387.30 Janitorial Supplies 15775 Palm Lodge Mobile Estates 1,581.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15776 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 1,263.62 Time 15777 Parts Unlimited 809.12 Truck Supplies 15778 Pepperiree Plaza 455.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15779 Pinnacle One 3,088.00 Consulting Services, 5-37-3 Page 8 of 12 Claims Paid From 11/16198 to 11/30/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15780 Plegel Oil Company 209.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15781 Pleion Corp.#2 213.02 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15782 Power Bros. Machine, Inc. 1.048.45 Equipment Rental 15783 Precious Metals Plating Co. 364.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15784 Pyramid Fence Company, Inc. 1.168.20 Fencing Installation 15785 Quality Inn,#740 2.375.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15786 Quality Building Supply 199.77 Building Supplies 15787 Rainbow Disposal Co., Inc. 2,235.02 Trash Removal 15788 Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. 488.53 Lab Supplies 15789 Ranch Motel 92.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15790 Remedy 20,653.25 Temporary Employment Services 15791 Restek Corporation 117.07 Training Registration 15792 Reynolds&Reynolds Company 216.27 Publications 15793 Road Works, Inc. 66.00 Seminar Registration 15794 Robin Hood Motel 335.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15795 Rosemount/Uniloc 206.07 Instrument Supplies 15796 Best Budget Inn 24.83 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15797 Russell Investments 3,590.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15798 Rusty Pelican Restaurant 150.27 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15799 Ryan Heroo Products Corp. 50.25 Metal 15800 Ryerson Tull Wholesale 2,628.00 Storage Containers 15801 RBF Engineers 4.500.00 Professional Services, 2-24-1 15802 RJN Group, Inc. 3,100.00 CMMS Consulting Services 15803 RPM Electric Motors 293.08 Electric Motor Supplies 15804 RS Hughes Co., Inc. 562.99 Paint Supplies 15805 S.G.E., Inc. 31.38 Mechanical Supplies 15806 Safelite Glass Corp. 241.45 Auto Supplies 15807 Sam Ash Music Stores 345.86 Electrical Supplies 15808 SantaFe Industrial Products 227.49 Mechanical Supplies 15809 Santana Services 114.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15810 Scott Laboratories 87.53 Lab Supplies 15811 Scoff Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,930.88 Specialty Gases 15812 Second-Sun 1,470.13 Light Fixtures 15813 Shureluck Sales& Engineering 7,152.25 Tools/Hardwam 15814 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 1,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 15815 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 288.62 Lab Supplies 15816 Silver Moon Motel C/O Par!Enterprises 294.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15817 Sizzler#1392 167.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Page 9 of 12 Claims Paid From 11/16198 to 11130/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15818 Sizzler Steak House 512.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15819 Smith Pipe& Supply, Inc. 332.02 Plumbing Supplies 15820 So.Cal. Gas Company 12,952.51 Natural Gas 15821 Soundview Executive Book Summaries 179.00 Subscriptions 15822 South Coast Water 55.00 Water System Maint.Agreement 15823 Sparkleds 2,173.73 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 15824 Speedy Circuits, Facility#2 172.01 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15826 Blame Cells, Inc. 173.59 Lab Supplies 15827 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 353.48 Management Agreement 16828 Strata International, Inc. 928.98 Chemicals 15829 Strip Clean Co 110.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15830 Stuart Anderson's Black Angus,#1039 634.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15831 Summit Steel 2,538.78 Metal 15832 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance 8,449.00 Landscape Maim. 15833 Sunset Ford 81.13 Truck Supplies 15834 Swains Electric Motor Service 1.361.68 Pump 15835 SARBS-CWEA 30.00 Registration 15836 SMT Dynamics Corporation 848.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15837 Taggin'Waggon Mobilhome Park 870.78 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15838 Taylor-Dunn 14.50 Electric Cart Parts 15839 Foxboro Company 973.25 Instrument Supplies 15840 The Register 1.675.80 Notices&Ads 15841 Thompson Industrial Supply, In 2,970.46 Mechanical Supplies 15842 Tiodize Co. 90.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15843 Aerofund Financial/Top Hat Productions 231.45 Catering Services 15844 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 644.33 Truck Supplies 15846 Truck Parts Supply&etc. 71.18 Truck Supplies 15846 TEKsystems 1,408.00 Service Agreement 15847 TRW Space&Electronic Group 100.00 Meter Calibration Service 15848 U.S. Postal Service 511.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15849 U.S. Postal Service 150.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15850 U.S.Postal Service 37.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15851 U.S. Postal Service 133.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15852 Unifirst Cap. 5,144.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15853 United Parcel Service 575.50 Parcel Services 15554 United States Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 15855 US Postal Service 302.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15856 Valley Cities Supply Company 5,401.36 Plumbing Supplies Page 10 of 12 Claims Paid From 11/16198 to 11130/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15857 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 576.93 Electrical Supplies 15858 Valley View Shopping Center 203.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15859 Van Waters&Rogers 2,801.50 Chemicals 15860 Vencor, Inc. 2,289.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15861 Village Nurseries 470.29 Landscaping Supplies 15862 VWR Scientific Products 3,324.46 Lab Supplies 15863 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,083.04 Security Guards 15864 Warehouse Restaurant 600.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15865 Warner Center Associates 749.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15866 Wayne Electric Co. 940.30 Electrical Supplies 15867 Weather and Wind Instrument Co. 475.72 Wind Sock Frame 15868 Weber Aircraft, Inc. 1.304.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15869 Bonnie Weberg 158.83 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15870 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 391.25 Safety Supplies 15871 West-Cite Supply Company, Inc. 460.51 Electrical Engineering Services 15872 Wasted 1,161.91 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15873 Western Canners, Inc. 290.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15874 Western Skies Mobilehome Park 1,776.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15875 Western States Chemical, Inc. 17,166.15 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 15876 Western Stales Industrial 303.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15677 The Westin South Coast Plaza 1,404.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund - 15878 Alice Wong 1.444.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 15879 Westrux International 39.09 Truck Supplies 15880 Whessoe Varec, Inc. 3,761.56 Valves 15881 Xerox Corporation 2.086.49 Copier Leases 15882 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 428.90 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15883 Kimberly C.Christensen 479.45 Training Expense Reimb. 15884 Dell Computers&Gerardo Amezcua 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 15885 Danny S. Evangelista 2,324.49 Employee Computer Loan Program 15886 Gateway Computers&Jan Orel 2,714.34 Employee Computer Loan Program 15887 David P. Halverson 1,240.71 Training&Meeting Expense Reimb. 15888 James D. Herberg 571.37 Meeting Expence Reimb. 15889 Gregory R. Mathews 1,737.79 Employee Computer Loan Program 15890 Donald F. McIntyre 1,571.34 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15891 Samuel L. Mowbray 554.17 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15892 Robert Dolan 330.65 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15893 Orange County Sanitation District 19.50 Petty Cash Reimb. 15894 Vann Phonsin 1,917.18 Employee Computer Loan Program Page 11 of 12 _, Claims Paid From 11/16/98 to 11/30/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15895 The Good Guys 8 Hylan Harrison 1,763.35 Employee Computer Loan Program 15896 The Good Guys 8 Victor Hartnett 1,661.89 Employee Computer Loan Program 15897 Edward M.Torres 151.27 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15898 Yu-LI Tsai 657.65 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15899 Bobby L.Unsell 115.00 Training Expense Reimb. 15900 William F.Webster,Jr 553.52 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15901 County of Orange 2,250.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 15902 Orange County Sanitation District 1,288.34 Petty Cash Reimb, 15903 City of Fountain Valley 860.00 Water Use 15904 South Coast Water 1,244.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,576,729.11 Payroll Disbursements 11586-11727 Employee Paychecks $ 184,707.98 Biweekly Payroll 11/18/98 32438-32878 Direct Deposit Statements 614,126.94 Biweekly Payroll 11/18/98 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 798,833.92 Wire Transfer Payments None Total Claims Paid 11/16198.11/30/98 $ 3,375,563.03 Page 12 of 12 v nd DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, November 18,.1998 at 3 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, November 18, 1998 at 3 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Board Peer Swan, Vice Chair Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMITS Committee STAFF PRESENT: Jan Debay, Chair, PDC Committee Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager George Brown, Outgoing Chair, FAHR Committee Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager John Collins, Past Chairman of the Boards Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Bill Steiner, County Supervisor Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Tom Saltarelli, Incoming Chair, FAHR Committee Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Directors Absent: Bob Oaten, Director of Operations and None Maintenance Greg Mathews, Asst. to the General Manager Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Gary Slreed, Director of Finance Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Vice Chair Swan was appointed Chair Pro Tem. Chair Dunlap arrived after the start of the meeting. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting of October 28, 1998 were approved as drafted. OCSO • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 r . Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 2 November 18, 1998 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Pro Tem Swan reported on his visit to the Wheeler Ridge property that is being considered for purchase as a composting site. He also drove the roads that the biosolids haulers use and found only one that was in bad shape. The OMTS Committee is recommending exercising the option to purchase this property at tonight's Board meeting as a long-term disposal option. Mr. Swan also announced that the EIR for the Groundwater Replenishment System has been released. The public hearing is scheduled for December 8, 1998 at the Orange County Water District. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre announced that staff is still working with CDM on the capital improvement report associated with the Strategic Plan. The first cut with costs was very high because of the GWR project and staff is reviewing to see if some projects can be delayed to Flatten out expenditures. Because there is still a lot of work to do on the report, the December 5 workshop and the December 3 PAC meeting will be delayed until January. Mr. Swan also mentioned that a new directors workshop should be scheduled as soon as possible for January. He also suggested that a Steering Committee workshop on the Strategic Plan should also be held in January with a workshop for the full Board in February. It was suggested that the Steering Committee Workshop be held in place of either the January OMTS or PDC Committees, as they are not meeting. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (8) STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS A. The action items scheduled to be considered by the working committees at their meetings in December were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were no other business, communications, or supplemental agenda items. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. 'y Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 3 November 18, 1998 (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for December 16, 1998 at 5 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session with members of the Management Negotiating Team at 3:20 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. Director Collins left the Closed Session at the beginning of the discussion on SPMT negotiations. At 6:05 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:06 p.m. ubmitted by: J n Tappan Bring Committee Secretary Nbp.AelpmWL51FER�W COYYRiEflY9V.VNf1/lpm+nYf.he \ a bm DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1998 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on December 2, 1998, in the District's Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: James Ferryman, Vice Chair Toby Weissert, Corollo Engineers Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Bob Chapman, Tulle Ranch Don Bankhead Shane McGannon, Tulle Ranch John Collins, Past Board Chair Anna Piercy Staff Present: Charles E. Sylvia Steve Anderson Don McIntyre, General Manager Margie L. Rice Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay Ed Hodges, Director General Services Admin. Bob Ooten, Director Operations and Maintenance Directors Absent: Patrick Miles, Director Information Technology Bob Ghirelli, Director Technical Services Pat McGuigan, Chair Frankie Woodside, Committee Secretary Ed Torres, Air Quality&Special Projects Manager George Robertson, ECM Supervisor Mike Moore, ECM Manager Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. OCSO 0 PO.amrIV 9 FoummveJ,.cn W?M127 0 (/14)W2-2411 Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee p Page 2 December 2, 1998 RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the November 4, 1998 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR (Vice Chair Ferryman) Vice Chair Ferryman welcomed Jan Debay to the Board. He reminded everyone that we would be dark in January 1999 and the OMITS Committee would not be meeting. Item 2, OMTS98- 040, was pulled from the Agenda by the originator REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER (McIntyre) The General Manager gave no report. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (Anderson) Update on item MTS98-032 Kern County Biosolids Ordinance and Road Mitigation Fee Agreement: 1)The District is only sending 60% of their biosolids to Kern County (down from a normal amount of 80%), with the balance being divided between Riverside and San Diego Counties. No fees are being paid at this time as the fees are being held until the County Board of Supervisors approves the actual ordinance, which should be in early 1999; 2)A Biosolids Ordinance Advisory Committee (BOAC) has been formed by the Kern County Board of Supervisors and they will be meeting December 3, 1998; and 3) Due diligence has begun regarding the Wheeler Ridge site with Mike Moore managing this project. A report will be brought to this Committee at the March 1999 meeting. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (Hodges) 1) Staff has finalized the Fueling Agreement with the City of Fountain Valley and they will begin utilizing our fueling pumps Monday, December 7, 1999; 2) The Guidance Review Committee requested a meeting be held with the Director's of Public Works, from the various cities, to discuss the established Proposed Evaluation Criteria. This meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 3, 1998 and will be referred to as a Partnering Policy Workshop; and 3) The Air Resources Board, the AQMD, and the Department of General Services have launched a new program called the EV Loan Program. This program encourages the purchase of electric vehicles. Staff will be in the possession of a Honda EV-Plus for one month. This vehicle will be available for use by staff members and/or Directors. If you would like to try this electric vehicle, please give me a call. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Miles) Update on item OMTS98-030 Year 2000 Date Change Compliance Project: This project is currently progressing as planned. Staff has located approximately 3,200 embedded devices that potentially could have a Y2K compliance problem. Original plans called for District staff to Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee ` Page 3 December 2, 1998 complete the assessment of these items. However, due to resource constraints, staff has contracted for electrical engineering assistance to meet the 1/31199 Y2K assessment goal. The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition and Programmable Logic Controllers programming appear to be compliant. The desktop computing systems have been assessed and repaired; and the telephone and radio systems have been documented to be Y2K compliant. Director Swan recommended that staff utilizes the services of R. W. Beck and access their database to match devices to see if they are compliant; and 2)The first phase of the Data Warehouse Project will be put into production this month. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (Ooten) Staff is reviewing the Peak Flow Management Plan before the rainy weather starts; and the O&M Annual Report has been published and is available for review. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES (Ghirelli) Staff is pleased to report that all 19 of the District's underground storage tanks are in full compliance with the December 22, 1998, EPA regulatory deadline and have been signed off by the Orange County Health Care Agency. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. DISCUSSION ITEM(S) 1. OMTS98-039 STRATEGIC PROCESS STUDIES CONTRACT SERVICES FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to authorize the General Manger to award a 36-month professional service contract to Science Applications International Corporation to conduct permit required "Strategic Process Studies"for the District's ocean monitoring program. These projects consist of the following: 1). Plume Tracking for a cost not to exceed $945,870.00. 2). Newport Canyon Sediments for a cost not to exceed $739,390.00. 3). Effluent Characterization for a cost not to exceed $196,268.00. The total cost for all three studies is not to exceed $1,881,528.00. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee i Page 4 December2, 1998 3. OMTS98-041 AUTOMATION OF DIGESTER GAS HYDROGEN SULFIDE CONTROL Motion: Information only. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for February 3, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Submitted by: Frankie Woodside Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary H:%wpAtMgsaA10\woodsidMOMrSM 99809mmbeA123-98 Minutes.00c OMITS COMMITTEE FM.D.9 Date To9a.or DU. ,1 12/2/98 12/IB/98 AGENDA REPORT 41amm Numbe I Item Num /G<a Orange County Sanitation District 39 FROM: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services-r.—�, RiG Originator: George Robertson, Senior Scientist SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PROCESS STUDIES CONTRACT SERVICES FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Award a 36-month professional services contract to Science Applications International Corporation to conduct permit required "Strategic Process Studies" for the District's ocean monitoring program. These projects consist of the following: 1). Plume Tracking for a cost not to exceed $945,870.00. 2). Newport Canyon Sediments for a cost not to exceed $739,390.00. 3). Effluent Characterization for a cost not to exceed $196,268.00. The total cost for all three studies is not to exceed $1,881,528.00. Projected annual costs are presented in Figure 2. SUMMARY The District's new ocean monitoring program consists of three major programmatic elements, Core Monitoring, Regional Monitoring, and Strategic Process Studies. These programmatic elements are required in our new NPDES permit. One goal for the new monitoring program design is to integrate Strategic Process Studies with the Core and Regional Monitoring program elements. Findings and information developed from the Strategic Process Studies will compliment and build upon those from the other components of the program. In March 1998, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region approved three Strategic Process Study designs that the District would initiate during the first year of our new permit cycle. These studies were presented to the OMTS Committee on March 4, 1998. The first series of Strategic Process Studies focuses on the District's plume. With changes in water contact standards (now out to three miles offshore) it has become increasingly more important for the District to better understand the dynamics of our plume. The three studies will evaluate: (1) the physical extent and variability of the District's wastewater plume — Plume Tracking; (2) the impact to and shoreward HF WNW55'N WTRE5ENi 0g aRepanf\pe -SPS M OJ Got CMWI m1111� 124e PM MF—R—. 626 Page 1 transport in the Newport Canyon— Newport Canyon Sediments; and (3) the final ASK effluent— Effluent Characterization. A more complete description of the studies and r their relationships to each other is provided in Attachment 1. The District solicited proposals for the Strategic Process Studies program element of our required ocean monitoring program. The proposal was sent out to over 45 companies or individuals throughout the United States known to provide environmental monitoring services. Two local southern California companies responded — Parsons Engineering Science, Incorporated, and Science Applications International Corporation. Science Applications International Corporation received both the highest technical ratings and overall scores for all three Strategic Process Studies. Details of the review are provided in Attachment 1. The review panel recommends awarding a 36-month professional services contract for the three Strategic Process Studies to Science Applications International Corporation for a cost not to exceed is $1,881,528.00 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY One of the goals of the redesigned Core Monitoring program element was to eliminate redundant and/or ineffectual sampling that provided no benefit to the District or regulators while maintaining cost neutrality. The overall average annual cost for the ocean monitoring would remain roughly the same for the new program with funds being reallocated to Regional Monitoring and Strategic Process Studies. Figure 1 provides a cost history for the first 13 years of District's 301(h) ocean monitoring program. While the cost of the program has fluctuated from year-to-year, the average annual expenditure was $1,702,902. IT",000 - tYYFAR OLERX MONITORING ANNUAL CO6i.ft,)p1,00] R000000 � pAA�\k f150000[ f 000000 1 Oo \\ I, ve510 Lfi610 I/611c Lae is >/eB to IIBO Io IM,Io 9oEm 11—v ]IBO Io 1.". 1N6m I.,N 61B! !I!I e/O 6I6B eIBO elBt Brvl YBl OF6 ORS NO OIB] eR6 Figure 1. Annual ocean monitoring costs from 1985 to 1997 with 13-year average cost. Last April the Boards approved a contract for the Core Monitoring program for an amount not to exceed $984,638. The difference, roughly $720,000, would be reallocated to the permit required Regional Monitoring and Strategic Process Studies. Figure 2 represents a projected annual budget for the first three years of our new ocean monitoring program. This budget takes into consideration the fact that these studies will span two or more years of the permit monitoring program. The projected average annual cost is estimated to be $1,706,814. However, the Newport Canyon Strategic Hq WSUM] W !Xtftw PAESENTV O .R.P MOSLSPS_M_03.Ool CRCIOO.I IM61012 Q PM MF.ROWwt'. MOSS Page 2 Process Study is a tiered study. If the results from the field studies conducted in Tier 1 j are negative, than Tier 2 will not be conducted. This would result in a decrease in the projected budget of over $450,000 in Years 2 and 3 of our new program. ® ProjIl.1.,vel IOpe en \y xn manJ nnBI I111 IM 114 NY0O M iIY I I I II IIIII I IIIII I N® I I' � IIIII 1 III i ee4.!Ijl( � ' N,4 Nbs, qRm anm BBase OMP ®Regional Monitoring ®Plume Modeling M Newport Canyon-Tier 1 ®Newport Canyon-Tier 2 ®Wastewater Characterization m New SPS Figure 2. Projected 3-year ocean monitoring costs versus 13-year average cost. Figure 2 shows the cost for the Core Monitoring program remaining stable for the first three years. This projection is based upon previous experience with contracting our ocean monitoring program. Year 1 costs for the three Strategic Process Studies is projected to be nearly $315,000 as each program gets under way. Year 2 of the new ocean monitoring program sees the greatest amount of sampling effort for the three studies and shows the biggest impact with projected costs of$1,060,498. Years 2 and 3 also include $100,000 for new studies (studies are proposed on an annual basis to EPA and the RWQCB). However, there is over $450,000 for the Newport Canyon—Tier 2 study in Years 2 and 3 that may not be expended depending on results from the Newport Canyon—Tier 1 study. The proposed total combined cost of services for the three Strategic Process Studies is $1,881,528.00, which will be spread out and budgeted over 36 months (three fiscal cycles). BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 53) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) H:Nvp dta,O55PmMAII WRESENM eM Rop nn,NDo6B SPS AR 034o1 C.I.d M I I1169B I1:40 PM PRF—RoviW MW O Page 3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES None. This contract is necessary to carry out the District's federal and state mandated ocean monitoring program. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1). Attachment 1 —Summary of Ocean Monitoring Strategic Process Studies and Contractor Selection Process N�.CIWa�EWN WaMeMW>IMer99 WS M M" CrsaN0 m 111189E 12.PM M Foy A..aFrr ermea Page 4 Attachment 1 Summary of Ocean Monitoring Strategic Process Studies and Contractor Selection Process Strategic Process Studies Overview The District's ocean monitoring program consists of three major programmatic elements, Core Monitoring, Regional Monitoring, and Strategic Process Studies. One goal for the new monitoring program design is to integrate Strategic Process Studies with the Core and Regional Monitoring program elements. Findings and information developed from the Strategic Process Studies will compliment and build upon those from the other components of the program. In March 1998, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region approved three Strategic Process Study designs that the District would initiate during the first year of our new permit cycle. These studies were presented to the OMTS Committee on March 4, 1998. The three approved studies will evaluate: (1) the physical extent of the District's wastewater plume— Plume Tracking; (2) the impact to and shoreward transport in the Newport Canyon — Newport Canyon Sediments; and (3) the final effluent— Effluent Characterization. A more complete description of the studies is provided below. The relationships of each study are presented in Figure Al. Plume Tracking The purpose of the Plume Tracking Strategic Process Study is to provide a quantitative characterization of the physical processes, primarily currents and water column stratification, that control the fate and determine the likelihood of onshore transport of the District's effluent plume. The study involves deployments of fixed current meter and thermister moorings and boat surveys to perform mapping of water quality parameters using towed instrumentation packages and pumped water samples. Newport Canyon Sediments This Strategic Process Study has two primary objectives: (1) determine whether the District's discharge affects sediment quality in Newport Canyon, and whether particles deposited in the canyon are transported toward shore; and (2) determine whether dredged material disposal operations at the LA-3 ocean disposal site affect the quality of sediments and health of benthic communities within the District's ocean monitoring study area. This study is divided into three phases with Phases 2 and 3 dependent upon results obtained in Phase 1. Phase 1 will evaluate the District's contributions to particle fluxes in the canyon by collecting and analyzing surface sediments for a chemical marker for sewage. Phases 2 and 3 involve collecting and analyzing sinking particles using sediment traps, and measuring sediment resuspension events using instrumented arrays. The use of sediment traps and instrumented arrays will depend on results from the initial analyses of sediments for sewage markers. Evaluations of impacts from K"ftYh155WOMnuWRESENrA a RapvNWMBS--Sps-M w C, .1.11 H 124 PM MF.RrnMC vm,te Page 5 dredged material disposal will involve collections and analyses of sediment quality and benthic infaunal samples from the vicinity of the disposal site. Effluent Characterization The purpose of this Strategic Process Study is to provide characterizations of the physical (e.g., particle size distributions) and chemical characteristics of the District's effluent. This study involves collections and analyses of effluent samples, partitioning of samples into different particle size classes, and analyses of each size class for suites of physical and chemical parameters. The effluent characterization Strategic Process Study will provide information on the dissolved and particulate fractions of the wastewater plume that will be useful for evaluating fates of the buoyant plume and settling particle phases that are of primary importance to the Plume Tracking and Newport Canyon Strategic Process Studies. Proposal Evaluation In August 1998, the District placed the three Strategic Process Studies required for the ocean monitoring program out for competitive proposals. These studies will occur over 36 months to account for all sampling and reporting segments. In October 1998, the District received two bids that consisted of a technical proposal and a separately sealed price proposal. A panel of five to seven reviewers, all District's employees, evaluated each technical proposals. All of the reviewers were experienced in environmental monitoring and reporting. The rating was broken into two components. First, each proposal was evaluated on a technical basis consisting of the qualifications and experience of the firm worth 40 points, and the proposed study design worth 40 points. If a company's proposal made it through the technical evaluation, then the proposed cost worth 20 points was factored into a final overall score. The review panel would select the company with the highest final overall score (out of the 100 points possible). The individual panelists first reviewed the proposals for technical merit and rated each company. The panel then met to discuss their evaluations and establish a final, overall technical ranking for each study agreed to by all panel members. If a company did not meet the technical needs of the District for a study, that company was eliminated from further consideration based upon a lack of technical merit. After deliberations, all reviewers agreed that Science Applications International Corporation was the best qualified company, technically, to carry out all three of the Strategic Process Studies for the District's ocean monitoring program. The panel determined that Parsons Engineering Science, Incorporated did not meet the District's technical criteria to conduct the Plume Tracking Study. Table 1 contains the technical rankings for the three studies. Xb EleWli55O.mMIImWRESENI nEa RaW.ul0Or SPSM 03&t LmledM Iill B13WPM MF—Rev. fl1688 Page 6 Table 1. Review panel's technical rankings. Qualifications study Design Technical Score -T Company and Experience (40 points max) (40 points max) (80 points max) Plume Tracking Strategic Process Study Parsons Engineering Science, I32 26' 58 Incorporated Science Applications 37 37 74 International Corporation Newport Canyon Strategic Process Study Parsons Engineering Science, 30 31 61 Incorporated Science Applications 38 37 75 International Corporation Effluent Characterization Strategic Process Study Parsons Engineering Science, 33 24 57 Incorporated Science Applications 36 36 72 International Corporation Proposal eliminated from further consideration based upon lack of technical merit. After the technical evaluation the separate, sealed price proposals were opened, reviewed and a final overall score determined. Table 2 provides the proposed cost of services for each study. Table 3 provides the final score for each Strategic Process Study. Table 2. Strategic Process Study Proposed Cost of Services. Company TProposed Cost of Services Plume Tracking Strategic Process Study Parsons Engineering Science, $780 348' Incorporated Science Applications $945,870 International Corporation Newport Canyon Strategic Process Study Parsons Engineering Science, $1.060,753 Incorporated Science Applications $739,390 International Corporation Effluent Characterization Strategic Process Study Parsons Engineering Science, $125 842 Incorporated Science Applications $196 268 International Corporation Proposal eliminated from further consideration based upon lack of technical merit. H Iry.NWUS5OvenncVRF3ENRPgrgs RW Os LSPS_MLW%1 G m1111G 12:WM MV.Rm comae Page Table 3. Final Overall Scores. ; Technical Soora proposed Cost Final Overall Scone Company (80 points max) Score' (100pointsmax) (20 points max) Plume Tracking Strategic Process Study Parsons Engineering Science, 582 20 78 Incorporated Science Applications 74 17 91 International Corporation Newport Canyon Strategic Process Study Parsons Engineering Science, 61 14 75 Incorporated Science Applications 75 20 95 International Corporation Effluent Characterization Strategic Process Study Parsons Engineering Science, 57 Incorporated 20 77 Sc IntemationaenceApplications l 72 13 85 Corporation Score based upon a ratio of the lowest cost with the lowest proposed cost getting 20 points. For example of Company A proposed $10,000 and Company B proposed $8,000, than Company B would get 20 points and Company A would get 16 points (i.e., $8,000/$10,000 x 20 points). 2Proposal eliminated from further consideration based upon lack of technical merit. HW dMW� RESENT%q RWWSN 1 SP5 M_OI.OM cm mII11W 12M PM MF.� B/'UV6 Page 8 EFFLUENT CHARACTERIZATION: • Variability and changes related to different treatment processes Buoyant Plume: Particle Settling: Near-ouffall effects: • Factors affecting chemical • Factors affecting • Particle deposition partitioning 0 sinking rates • Organic loading • Dilution • Biological interactions PLUME TRANSPORT: PARTICLE TRANSPORT: • Onshore transport (and • Transport and deposition towards Newport Canyon) in canyons • Dilution rate • Shoreward transport in canyons • Coliform viability • WQ compliance/ health risks Optional: • Long-term fate of effluent particles Figure Al . Relationships between Year 1 Strategic Process Studies. DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, December 3, 1998, at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, December 3, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Collins, Past Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Brian Donahue Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Jan Debay, Board Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Eva Miner-Bradford Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Patsy Marshall Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager Christina Shea Bob Chenowith, Principal Eng. Associate Dave Sullivan Gail Cain, Executive Assistant Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Absent: Gerald Lindquist, DGA Consultants Norm Eckenrode, Chair Lee Badertscher, Lee 8 Ro Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM In the absence of Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the PDC Committee, Director Brian Donahue was appointed as Chair pro tem. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. OCSD . P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 o (714) 982-2411 �a Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 2 December 3, 1998 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the November 5, 1998 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager was not present. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering updated the Committee on two projects that were discussed previously. The first item was the construction of several storm water retention basins at Plant No. 2. Direction from the Committee was to take bids from on-site contractors, and if it there was a bid less than $100,000, to move forward with a change order to get that work constructed. The Director of Engineering advised that proposals were sent to four of the on-site contractors, and on Monday, November 30, staff received price quotes back from two of the contractors. Advanco Constructors submitted a low bid of$86,968. The second bid was approximately$89,100. As a result, a change order will be issued to Advanco to do the work. The work is scheduled to begin next week, and should be completed in two to three weeks. The Director of Engineering advised that another project that was brought to the Committee in the past was a change order relative to the construction of the surge tower at Plant No. 2, to retrofit the surge tower to fix a structural defect in the design. That work has been completed, other than the hydraulic tests. As noted previously, that effort will be invoiced to Carollo Engineers for payment of that extra work, which equals approximately$300,000. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent (5%). r° Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 3 December 3, 1998 (11) ACTION ITEMS(Items No. a-j) a. PDC98-47: Ratify Change Order No. 16 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction for a net addition amount of$130,396 and 60 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $35.629,753. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval to increase the authorization by$145,000, but not increase the current project budget. b. PDC98-48: Accept Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plants No. 1 and 2, Jobs No. P1-40.2RIP2-47-2R as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the final closeout agreement with Margate Construction, Inc. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. c. PDC98-49: Approve a budget amendment of$566,000 for Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, for a total project budget of$4,447,000. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to continue this item to February at which time a change order will be included to explain the need for the budget increase. d. PDC98-50: Approve Professional Services Agreement for Value Engineering Services for Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. P1.37, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. for a total not to exceed $81,580. Discussion: Committee members requested that staff develop a policy on the use of Value Engineering services on future projects. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. e. PDC98-51: Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro, Inc. for Jobs No. P1-40-1 and P2-47-1, for additional design and construction support services for$280,234 for a total not to exceed $1,772,478. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. f. PDC98-52: (1) Establish a budget of$90,000 for Contract No. 1-2-4; and (2) Approve Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants to perform engineering services and prepare a project report for the Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-17, Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-2-4, and Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for an amount not to exceed $190,545. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. P� Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 4 December 3, 1998 g. PDC98-53: Approve a budget amendment of$345,300 for a total project budget of $1,735,900 for Contract No. 2-34R; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Approve award of contract to Sancon Engineering II, Inc. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. h. PDC98-54: (1)Approve Plans and Specifications for the Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R; and (2) Approve a budget amendment for Contract No. 3-35R in the amount of$3,000,000. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. i. PDC98-55: Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates (ESA) for preparation of Phase 3 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J40-4, to provide additional environmental services in the amount of$90,457 for a total not to exceed $352,571. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Director Swan requested that at the February PDC Committee Meeting, staff be prepared to discuss and refine the list of additional projects CDM is considering. The Director of Engineering advised there were plans to have an Ad Hoc or Board Workshop in early January to go over that subject. Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor, advised that everyone was polled as to what dates they preferred, and it was determined the Ad Hoc Meeting will be on either January 6 or 7, and a Board Workshop is scheduled for January 9, 1999. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. 0 Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 5 December 3, 1998 (16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 4, 1999. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Submitted by: ail Cain PDC Committee Secretary H: vp.tlla�&DC91)CGSOECW1inWm. o PDC COMMITTEE Me^irg oate To It.ees 1213/98 12/16/N AGENDA REPORT I Number Item N r Orange County Sanitation Dist FROM: David Ludwi , irector of Engineering Originator: Patrick Pan, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO P1-36-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 16 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 with Margate Construction for a net addition amount of$130,396 and 60 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $35,629,753. SUMMARY Change Order No. 16 includes fourteen items of added work to Job No. P1-36-2. There are two omission items associated with this change order. There is a 60 day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $35,291,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 208,357.00 This Change (Add) $ 130,396.00 Change Orders to Date $ 338,753.00 Percentage Increase 0.96% Amended Contract Price $35,629,753.00 Value Engineering Credits $ 329,194.00 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: A.3.b) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. P1-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, consists of expanding the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. The project provides ten new secondary clarifiers, replacement of the return activated sludge (RAS) pumps, replacement of the existing aeration system, renovation of existing blowers, renovation of three existing dissolved air Flotation thickeners (DAF), three new dissolved air flotation thickeners (DAF) and other improvements. These improvements will increase the secondary treatment capacity from forty-six million gallons per day to eighty million gallons per day. The contract also includes a new pump station for the Orange County Water District for which the District will be reimbursed. Carollo Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate on September 18, 1995. This contract is 99% complete. The following summarizes the change order. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Plant Water Line Reroute at $ 3,310 0 Omission Existing Clarifiers 2 Remove Concrete Covers at 4.647 0 Design Change Existing Aeration Basins 3 Change Spray Nozzles at 739 0 Design Change Secondary Clarifiers 4 Instrument Air Piping Addition at 5.558 7 Design Change RAS Pump Station 5 Diffuser Modifications in Existing 12,638 14 Design Change Aeration Basins 6 Bubbler Tube Modifications at DAF 921 0 Design Change Facility TWAS Sumps 7 Add Grounding Circuit for Turblex 7,104 0 Design Change Blowers 8 Revise Wiring Schematics for 2,030 0 Omission TWAS Pump DP Switches 9 Miscellaneous Electrical 4,850 0 Changed Modifications Condition 10 Repair Mixed Liquor Channel Gates 35,740 25 Design Change 11 Remove and Replace Electrical 19,871 0 Design Change Conduit at DAF Facility 12 Change Circuit Breakers for Sump 823 0 Design Change Pumps 13 Add Pumping to Clarifier Drains 29,593 14 Design Change 14 Add Guard Posts on Existing 2,572 0 Design Change Aeration Basin Deck TOTAL -Change Order No. 16 $130,396 60 All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the design phase. ALTERNATIVES None 1UadonWatallwp.dlal nguoBs&CONTRACTSIPI.36.21P1362AIR-COt6.dac Page 2 CEQA FINDINGS 5 None ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order PP:Ic H:6vp.dlaNmgU0aS S CONTRACTS%P7-3&2M%362AIrt-CO16.d= Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 OR161NAL CURRENT PROPOSED- PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT? BUDGET'ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT -REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL-' EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE .. BUDGET TO DATE - REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE - TODATE(%) (See Bslovq Design* $ 1,406,065 $ 1.469.058 $ - $ 1.469.068 $ 1.469,058 $ $ 1,469,058 $ 1,302,30D 89% Construction $ 35,835,690 $ 36.035.690 $ 36.035.690 $ 35,499,357 $ 130,398 $ 35,629.753 $ 35,297,330 99% E n $ 3,358.245 $ 3,295.252 $ 3.295.252 $ 3,295,252 $ 14.604 $ 3,309,856 $ 1,981,302 60% $ 40,600,000 $ 40.800,000 $ - $ 40,800,000 $ 40,263.667 $ 145,000 $ 40.408,667 $ 38.580,932 95% •"Design" represents the portion of the Design Consultant PSA associated with the P1-36.2 project. Hew AWa 9vaes—Iy126M352 Revised 1277198 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 6/28195 $ 35,291,000.00 $ 35,291,000.00 0.00 900 900 CO NO. 1 11/22/95 $ (297,500.00) $ 34,993,500.00 (0.84) 0 900 CO NO. 2 616/96 $ - $ 34,993,500.00 (0.84) 0 900 CO NO. 3 8/28196 $ (100.226.00) $ 34,893,274.00 (1.13) 0 900 CO NO.4 9/25/96 $ 24,733.00 $ 34,918,007.00 (1.06) 0 900 "CO NO. 5 10/3/96 $ 29,251.00 $ 34,947,258.00 (0.97) 0 900 CO NO. 6 3126/97 $ 179,966.00 $ 35,127,224.00 (0.46) 0 900 CO NO. 7 4/23/97 $ 130,573.00 $ 35,257,797.00 (0.09) 28 928 *CO NO. 8 4/24/97 $ - $ 35,257,797.00 (0.09) 98 1026 "CO NO. 9 8/7/97 It (2,479.00) $ 35,255,318.00 (0.10) 0 1026 -CO NO. 10 10/16/97 $ 6,966.00 $ 35,262,284.00 (0.08) 0 1026 CO NO. 11 12/17/97 $ 69,628.00 $ 35,331,912.00 0.12 0 1026 *CO NO. 12 4/8/98 $ 22,651.00 $ 35,354,563.00 0.18 0 1026 'CO NO. 13 6/24/98 $ (8,272.00) $ 35,346,291.00 0.16 17 1043 "CO NO. 14 9/3/98 $ 30,154.00 $ 35,376,445.00 0.24 15 1058 CO NO. 15 10/28/98 $ 122.912.00 $ 35,499,357.00 0.59 38 1096 CO NO. 16 Pending $ 130,396.00 $ 35,629,753.00 0.96 60 1156 *Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 "Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 9M P1362CO Stet apt Page 1 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Sixteen (16) Date: December 16 1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36.2 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Beduet) $ 130,396.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — PLANT WATER LINE REROUTES AT EXISTING CLARIFIERS This item provides extra labor and material to route the new 3-inch PVC Plant Water line at the existing secondary clarifiers. This reroute was necessary to avoid conflict with the new spray support beams. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(6)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-85) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3.310.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—REMOVE CONCRETE COVERS AT EXISTING AERATION BASINS This item is for extra work to remove the existing concrete covers and install temporary handrails on top of the existing Aeration Basins. The District's Operations Division requested this work to allow visual inspection inside of these basins. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-88) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 4,647.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days a Page 2 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Sixteen (16) Date: December 16,1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-36-2 ITEM 3 —CHANGE SPRAY NOZZLES AT SECONDARY CLARIFIERS This item changes the scum spray nozzles for the existing secondary clarifiers from 1/8-inch in diameter to %-inch. The larger diameter nozzles are necessary to avoid clogging problems and reduce maintenance cost. This work was not included in the original contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-89, PCH P1362-93) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 739.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4— INSTRUMENT AIR PIPING ADDITION AT RAS PUMP STATION This item is for providing new stainless steel Instrument Air(IA) piping for the bubbler system at the RAS Pump Station to replace the existing piping. The existing black steel IA pipes are badly deteriorated and undersized for the new bubbler system. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-129) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,558.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days ITEM 5— DIFFUSER MODIFICATIONS IN EXISTING AERATION BASINS This item is for labor to trim 20 inches off of the diffusers near the baffles in existing Aeration Basins and trim 12 inches off of the bottom of the baffles. This modification provides improved access for maintenance personnel inside of basins to perform repair and cleaning work, thereby reducing maintenance effort while improving worker safety. This work was not included in the original contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(6)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-135) ADDED COST FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,638.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days Y Page 3 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Sixteen (16) Date: December 16.1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Imorovements at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-36-2 ITEM 6— BUBBLER TUBE MODIFICATIONS AT DAF FACILITY TWAS SUMPS This item provides labor to modify the bubbler tube for the existing DAF TWAS Sumps 1, 2, and 3. This work is necessary so that the bubbler tube elevations in the existing DAF and the new DAF have the same elevation. This allows for consistent operation and calibration for the entire facility. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-140) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 921.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7—ADD GROUNDING CIRCUIT FOR TURBLEX BLOWERS This item provides labor and material to install ground conductor cables from Turblex Blower Skid No. 1 and 2 to the existing cable tray in the basement. This work was not shown in the original contract documents and is required to comply with the blower manufacturers recommendations and the NEC Codes. This item was accomplished by Contractor force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-62) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,104 .00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8— REVISE WIRING SCHEMATICS FOR TWAS PUMP AND POLYMER FEED PUMP DISCHARGE PRESSURE SWITCHES This item provides additional relay connection contacts for TWAS Pump and Polymer Feed Pump Low and High Discharge Pressure Switches. This revision is necessary to provide a fail- safe method of slopping the pumps under low or high discharge pressure conditions if the PLC is out of service. This item was accomplished by Contractor force account pursuant to Section 10- 6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-117, PCH P1362-47) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2.030 .00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days f II Page 4 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT !! 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction - C.O. No.: Sixteen (161 Date: December 16,1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 9—MISCELLLANEOUS ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS This item provides labor and material to connect the 2-inch signal conduit to the existing junction box at the property line to complete the circuit from the OCWD Pump station. This item also provides labor and material to repair a 2-inch conduit and pullbox on Fuentes Road near the Construction Management Complex,which was damaged by unknown parties during previous construction work. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-112) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4.850 .00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10—REPAIR MIXED LIQUOR CHANNEL GATES This item provides work to clean, adjust, and epoxy coat 42 badly leaking mixed liquor channel gates at the existing secondary clarifiers. This item includes repair of the deteriorated concrete under gate operator supports and provides new concrete anchors at various locations. This area was isolated (the Activated Sludge Plant is shutdown)to perform contract work; performing repairs now will eliminate another shutdown in the future. This work was not included in the original contract documents. This item was accomplished by the Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-122) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $35.740.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 25 Calendar Days ITEM 11 —REMOVE AND REPLACE ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AT EXISTING DAF FACILITY This item is for removing and replacing existing PVC conduits, supports, and junction boxes with new PVC coated GRS conduits, supports and junction boxes. This work was necessary to meet the NEC requirement and will improve safety and reliability of the equipment. This item was accomplished by the Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-125, PCH P1362-53) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 19,871.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 5 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Sixteen (16) Date: December 16,1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 12—CHANGE CIRCUIT BREAKERS FOR SUMP PUMPS This item provides 20 Amp and 30 Amp circuit breakers in lieu of 7 Amp and 20 Amp breakers specified in the contract documents for sump pumps. The circuits were designed for typical 4.8 full load amp, 3 horsepower motors. The pumps, as approved and supplied, have severe duty submersible type motors and have a full load amp rating of 9 Amps each. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-128) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 823 .00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 13—ADD PUMPING TO CLARIFIER DRAINS This item is to modify the piping in the clarifier tunnel and the RAS Pump Station in order to connect the Secondary Clarifier drains to the existing WAS Pumps No. 1 and 2. This work includes additional piping, valves and fittings, pipe supports, painting, and electrical work. This change was requested by the Operations and Maintenance staff and will result in a significant amount of labor savings for the maintenance staff. Doing this work on P1-36-2 presented several advantages to save money including utilizing facilities already shutdown and cleaned, using salvaged piping and fittings, and savings on overhead and staff time to prepare detailed design. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10- 6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-138) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 29,593.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days ITEM 14—ADD GUARD POSTS ON EXISTING AERATION BASIN DECK This item provided 10 new guard posts and traffic striping on top of the existing Aeration Basins. This work is necessary to provide traffic safety and protection of equipment in this area. This work was not included in the original contract documents. This Item was negotiated with the Contractors pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P11362- 142, PCH P1362-57) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,572.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 0 Page 6 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX$127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Maroate Construction C.O. No.: Sixteen (16) Date: December 16,1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 130,396.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 60 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 38 calendar day time extension is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Dale: September 18, 1995 Original Contract Time: 900 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 5, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 60 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 256 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 1,156 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 16, 1998 Projected Completion Date: November 30, 1998 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $35,291,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 208,357.00 This Change Order(Add) $ 130,396.00 Amended Contract Price $ 35,629,753.00 u Page 7 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Sixteen (16) Date: December 16,1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pi-36-2 Board Acceptance Date: December 16, 1998 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submmoted by: �I Corrrlllssffruction Manager Date Ap rov d /a Director qfnginaa&nng Date Accepted by: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION Con actor Date PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date Ta]L Bds. IZ13/99 17J36/9e tem I Nu AGENDA REPORT m K I[em N m Mm Orange County Sanitabon Dist ct FROM: David Lud , r ctor of Engineering Originator: Patrick Pan, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT FOR FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANTS NO. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. P140-2R/P2-47-2R GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Accept Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plants No. 1 and 2, Jobs No. P1-40-2R/P247-2R as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the final closeout agreement with Margate Construction Inc. SUMMARY Job No. P1-40-2R/P2-47-2R, Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plants No. 1 and 2, consists of providing improvements for both plants to upgrade operations, health and safety, and maintenance. Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate on January 6, 1997. The contract is complete, PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 1,900,000.00 Total Contract Change Orders $ 73,675.00 Percentage Increase 3.88% Final Adjusted Amount $ 1,973,675.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: A.3.b) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information 2. Change Order Status Report PP:Ic G:NIgbNNpeM poll Repwp'DpCD110}A W y M I.peMa ReCvt bac Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant Nos. 1 & 2 Job Nos. P'1-40-2R/P2-47-2R 61 ORIGINAL CURRENT<. PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED' , ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTH6R(3.ATION TOTA6,'1' b(PENDITURE' COMPLETE t BUDGET. BUDGET y+ INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE gEE3T b. AUTHog12A'7pN +`kT0#D�{ALE TO DATEI%I P1.40-2R Design $ 365,000 $ 299,715 $ 299,715 $ 299,715 $ 299,715 $ 271,247 91% Construction $ 1,117,310 $ 1.026,000 $ 1.026.000 $ 1.008,822 $ 1,008,822 $ 972,300 96% Staff and Support $ 182,690 $ 339,285 $ 339,285 1' $ 339,285 $ 339,285 $ 260,457 77% Subtotal $ 1,665,000 $ 1.665.000 $ 1,665,000 $ 1,647,822 $ - $ 1.647,822 $ 1,504,004 91% P2.47-2R Design $ 380.000 $ 294,000 $ 294,000 ? $ 294,000 $ 294.000 $ 292,626 100% Construction $ 1,000,000 $ 969.000 $ 969.000 $ 964.853 $ 964,853 $ 760.930 79% Staff and Support $ 628.000 $ 367.000 It 367.000 "' $ 367,000 $ 367.000 $ 237,071 65% r Subtotal $ 2.008,000 $ 1.630.000 $ 1,630,000 `; $ 1,625,853 $ - $ 1,625,853 $ 1,290,627 79% TOTAL $ 3.673.000 $ 3.295.000 $ - $ 3,295,000 �s' $ 3,273,675 $ - $ 3,273.675 $ 2,794,631 85% HNpdWW. l geWl40ZBIT d.s ReMee4 0a100I44 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Facility Modifications & Safety Upgrades Job Nos. P1-40-2R/P2-47-2R AUTHORIZED TIME APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE TIME REM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) TO DATE (DAYS) CONTRACT 1/6/97 $ 1,900,000.00 $ 1,900,000.00 0.00 365 365 CO NO. 1' 1/1198 $ 16,224.00 $ 1,916,224.00 0.85 0 365 CO NO. 2' 4122/98 $ 1,404.00 $ 1,917,628.00 0.93 0 365 CO 11/5198 $ 56,047.00 $ 1,973,675.00 3.88 228 593 Approved by GM per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 "Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-8 H:\wp.dtawngyobS conlracl1pl402\P1402.zISlCO Stet Rpt PDC COMMITTEE ng� To - 98 12-03.98 132 AGENDA REPORT trlIII NYIIW It m YDC98-SO Orange County Sanitation istri FROM: David Lu irector of Engineering Originator: husk Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR VALUE ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR PRIMARY CLARIFIERS AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB NO. P1-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for Value Engineering Services for Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. Pt-37, with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. for a total not to exceed $ 81,580. SUMMARY In September 1998, the Board awarded a PSA to Brown and Caldwell for design of the expansion of the Primary Clarifiers at Plant No. 1. Because this project is of significant size and cost (up to 96 MGD and $62,127,000), Staff is recommending that a Value Engineering study be performed at the 30 percent and 60 percent design phases. Historically, Value Engineering studies have proven to result in up to a $15 return for each dollar invested in the studies. Capital savings typically range between five and thirty percent as a result of Value Engineering studies. Although there are other benefits derived from performing this study, such as increased reliability, ease of operation, and reduced maintenance efforts, the potential cost savings are enough incentive to pursue Value Engineering Services for this project. Staff has solicited proposals from four firms qualified to perform Value Engineering services. Based on the proposal evaluation and staff negotiations conducted in accordance with Board Resolution No. OCSD 98-8, Staff recommends approval of a PSA for Value Engineering Services for Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, to Sverdrup Civil, Inc. for a total not to exceed $ 81,580. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached"Budget Information Table." (Attachment "A") Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: Plant t,2-6) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) See attached "Budget Information Table." (Attachment "A") ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District is interested in optimizing costs and enhancing reliability and performance during design and construction of the new primary treatment facilities and related facilities. Value Engineering studies are typically performed at the 30 percent and 60 percent design stages. A preliminary and a final report will be submitted at each stage. The Value Engineering process consists of the following phases: • An Information Phase; collection of all facts, background and data that are pertinent to the design, including an energy and a cost model. • A Speculative/Creative Phase; creation of a list of alternative ways to perform the essential functions found during information gathering, concentrating on areas with highest potential savings. • An Evaluation/Analytical Phase; evaluation of the feasibility of alternatives generated during the creative phase. • A Development/Recommendation Phase; complete evaluation of the most feasible alternatives and identification of Value Engineering recommendations. Final recommendations following the study will include: • A summary of Value Engineering recommendations • Estimated cost savings for each Value Engineering recommendation • Accepted Value Engineering recommendations • Cost and a schedule for implementing the accepted recommendations • Rejected recommendations and reasons for rejection • Expected savings (both capital and O&M) for the accepted Value Engineering recommendations Page 2 Value Engineering is a systematic approach for searching out high-cost areas in a design. The intent is to arrive at the best balance of cost, performance, and reliability. The proposed value engineering will involve the cooperative participation of staff from the design consultant (Brown and Caldwell) team, the value engineering consultants and the District. The use of Value Engineering offers numerous benefits to the District. Value Engineering can generate substantial cost savings with a relatively low expenditure of total project funds and administrative effort. In addition, substantial operating and maintenance savings may be realized over the life of the primary clarifiers. Value Engineering also increases overall sensitivity to project costs. Consultant Selection Procedure Staff solicited proposals from four firms qualified for the project. Two teams responded: • Sverdrup Civil, Inc. • Dudek& Associates, Inc. A four-member evaluation team reviewed and ranked the proposals. Based on the proposal evaluation, Staff ranked the two firms and selected Sverdrup Civil, Inc. as the top-rated firm. Following the ranking process, Staff opened the sealed fee proposals of the qualified firms. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. submitted the lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Firm Fee Proposal Dudek $99,600 Sverdrup $81,580 ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with P1-37 Value Engineering Study (NO ACTION). The no action alternative could: • Prevent identification of substantial capital cost savings • Prevent identification of potential operating and maintenance costs savings over the life of the Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities • Reduce the Districts chances of identifying areas to increase plant reliability, improve current treatment processes, and optimize proposed treatment processes at a minimum cost Page 3 CEQA FINDINGS Final 1989 Master Plan EIR approved on July 19,1989; and Notice of Determination filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table (Attachment "A") 2. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to provide engineering services (Attachment "B") CJH:jam Wntglabal'Agenda Draft RepodstPDCT1-3M&W-P1-37AR g9039 A& Page 4 ATTACHMENT"A" BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities Job No. P1-37 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design Consultant (PSA) $ 3170.000 S 3,170.000 $ 2201715 $ 87580 $ 2283.295 $ 208,715 9% OCSD Staff,Oesi n $ 877,500 $ 877,500 $ 877,500 $ 877,500 $ 150,000 17% Construction Contract $ 43.649,000 $ 43,649000 $ - $ 0% OCSD Staff, Inspect/Construct $ 3467000 $ 3.467,000 $ - $ 0% Contingency $ 10.202000 $ 10,202000 $ - $ 0% Other ' S 761500 $ 761.500 $ - g 0% TOTAL $ 38450.000 $ 62,127,000 $ - $ 62,127.000 $ 3,079215 $ 81,580 is 3,160.795 1 $ 358.715 1 11% ' Sails Conlnd,Survey Conewl.Testing Contract,Legal Fees.Equip oenl G sirgbEaNgan"reWc1P13PBUDGET1-P1-37 Reseed 057"S ATTACHMENT "B" Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Value Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Dudek and Associates • Montgomery Watson • George Wesner • Sverdrup Corporation Montgomery Watson and George Wesner declined to submit proposals. As a result, two consulting firms submitted proposals on September 14, 1998. Proposals were reviewed and ranked by an in-house review panel from September 14 -24, 1998. The review panel consisted of four members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10, 10 being best, in six categories. Each category was weighted so that the total maximum score for all six categories is 660. The categories are described below. 1. Team Composition: Ensure the proper mix of team disciplines; proper leveIs of design, construction, operational, and VALUE ENGINEERING experience; appropriate number of teams and team members; and acceptable employment affiliations of team members (no members from the designer's firm). (Weight =15) 2. VETC: Ensure the proper level of Value Engineering and management experience; ability to establish a productive working relationship with the proposed Value Engineering team members and the project designer. (Weight=15) 3. Schedule: Ensure compliance with the design schedule. (Weight=10) 4. Approach: Ensure that the proposed approach for conducting the Value Engineering study is consistent with the EPA publication entitled "Value Engineering for Wastewater Treatment Works." (Weight=10) 5. Level of Effort: Ensure that the proposed level of effort is sufficient to meet the project needs and the intent of the EPA publication entitled"Value Engineering for Wastewater Treatment Works." Recognize that the ultimate project cost savings will far exceed the higher study costs for a quality Value Engineering consultant and team. (Weight=10) S. References: Ensure a satisfactory level of performance on previous Value Engineering studies. (Weight=5) G'n10nWNgeMapM(iepa,tt'POCV+13TS4X w+Wale VF Prqusb.Eoe R. I111Y 1 After reviewing and grading the proposals, the two consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results of the two firms: 1. Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 2415 points 2. Dudek and Associates 2255 points Based on the proposal evaluation, Staff selected the Sverdup Civil, Inc. team as the top- rated consultant. After ranking the proposals, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the two candidates. The top ranked Consultant, Sverdup Civil, Inc. submitted the lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Staff recommends Sverdup Civil, Inc. to be awarded the PSA for Value Engineering Services for Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 for a total fee not to exceed $81,580. CJH:jam \t~Watal WglobalWgenda Draft ReportsTMP1-3Maff evaluate-VE Propossls.d GM�BbWN9eMMn MepwuV9CW1dn1911 m4a4.VF G,WaaXbc RenaeG.nnBna 2 P7-37 VE PROPOSAL RANKING RESULTS O j C U °a ui O N � Q Reviewer A 610.0 540.0 Reviewer B 585.0 585.0 Reviewer C 570.0 550.0 Reviewer D 650.0 580.0 Total Score (2600 Points max.) 2415.0 2255.0 Average Score (650 Points max.) 301.9 281.9 Workforce Estimate (man-hours) 648 760 100% Design Completion Proposed 13 Months 13 Months Proposed not to exceed Fee $81,580 $99,600 Average cost per Hour $125.90 $131.05 G'ngieoaMpanEa UaM1 RegvISNGCV+t]]1P111-VE Pmp W Iteww Summmy PDC COMMITTEE MeetlnB DMe TO Ba.of Dir. 12/3/96 12/16/9a AGENDA REPORT mNumbe Ire Nrbr 8- Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Lu ctor of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. 131- 40-1, AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Lee and Ro, Inc. for Job Nos. P1-40-1 and P2-47-1, for additional design and construction support services for$280,234 for a total not to exceed $1,772,478. SUMMARY In December 1993, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Lee & Ro, Inc. for the design of Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plants No. 1 and 2. This project includes the Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K, L, M. N. and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-39. The project has been modified through four previous addenda to meet changing requirements. In the original scope of work for this project, electrical room modifications for the Digester Rehabilitation project would be designed to meet the requirements for areas determined to contain explosion hazards. The Consultant and District staff now agree that a better design philosophy is to modify the environments in the electrical rooms and reclassify them as non-hazardous areas. A non-hazardous classification would lead to equipment cost savings for this project and future retrofits to the electrical rooms. To implement this design philosophy, an additional $115,870 is requested for engineering design services. In consideration of the four previous addenda and this Addendum No. 5, the estimate for the construction support services as proposed in 1993 for the original scope was evaluated. An additional $164,364 is requested for construction support services. Please see the "Additional Information" section for further explanation. G NIA1bbaMgenda Draft Re PC�SWDCtl 196 Add P1401 Goc R-W ar 8 Page 1 The total increase requested for Addendum No. 5 is $280,234. The total value of the Professional Services Agreement would increase from $1,492,244 to $1,772,478. Staff requests the approval of Addendum No. 5 to the PSA. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See individual Budget Information Tables for Job No. P1-40-1, Job No. P2-47-1, and Job No. P2-39. BUDGETIMPACT ® These items have been budgeted. (Une items: section a-P14o-1 is Page s item 5.1b,P247-1 is Page 9 Rem 5.e, and P2-39 is Page 9 item 4.d) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background In December 1993, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Lee & Ro, Inc. for the design of Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plants No. 1 and 2. The original scope of work was for studies and the preparation of plans and specification for 23 miscellaneous tasks and the design of the Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J, K. L, M, N, and 0 at Plant No. 2. The project has changed since the award of the PSA through four previous addenda. An Addendum No. 5 is proposed. The addenda are summarized in the table titled "Professional Services Agreement Status Report" (attached). A brief project status follows. Project Status Design is complete for Job No. P140-1. The construction has been implemented through Job No. P140-2 (Rebid) and Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid) and two small construction projects. • Construction is complete for Job No. P1-40-2 (Rebid). • Job No. P1444 (Rebid) is expected to award for construction in January 1999. c 1nlglabaM ends Dnn RepoMwCCn 16e ned5 P1401 ax Rena. M"a Page 2 9 Design is complete for Job No. P1-47. • Plans and specifications for the 12 kV distribution system upgrade and laboratory electrical system upgrade, Job No. P1-47, were presented to the PDC Committee, but the project was not approved for construction. • The Fire Alarm System upgrades are under construction through Job No. J57. There are three groupings of projects for Job No. P2-47-1. • Six tasks are included in the construction project, Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P247-1. This project was awarded for construction in October 1998, • The second project will upgrade the electrical system and instrumentation for the activated sludge secondary facility. The design for this work is 90% complete and will bid with the project to install a new PLC for the secondary facilities, Job No. J-314. • The final project will design a temporary filtrate clarifier. This project is at the 30% design level. This project is on hold. The project will proceed based on the facilities siting recommendations from the Strategic Plan. There are two projects resulting from the work to rehabilitate the digesters. • Construction is complete for the project TWAS Feed to Digesters F & G, Job No. P2-39-1. • The design of the Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39, is 85% complete and will bid in March 1999. Addendum No. 5 Addendum No. 5 includes design changes for the Digester Rehabilitation project, Job No. P2-39, for$115,870. Addendum No. 5 includes increases in the construction support services for Jobs No. P2-47-1 and 132-39 and decreases in the construction support services for Jobs No. P1-40-1 and P147 for a net amount of$164,364. The total value for Addendum No. 5 is $280,234. Addendum No. 5 Design Change The original PSA issued in 1993 required the facilities to be designed to meet the National Fire Protection Association's Standard for Fire Protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities (NFPA 820). In 1995, this standard was extensively revised. In part, this revision made the requirements more clear. An evaluation against this revised standard was postponed while staff implemented a project to classify all facilities against NFPA 820. Design work on the Digester Rehabilitation project was also on hold for approximately one year in D:,glomry nde Di ReMftw idMB 5P14m.doo Page 3 m 1997 and 1998 due to the impact of the automation project on the Digester Rehabilitation Project. With the Digester Rehabilitation project restarted, the consultant reviewed the electrical design in consideration of the revised and more clearly written standards. To meet the intent of the original scope of work, it was determined that the electrical room modifications would be designed in accordance with the requirements for classified locations. New equipment that meets the requirements for classified locations would be installed in existing electrical gear that does not meet the requirements of a classified location. With the revised standards, it is now clear that a modification to change the environment within the electrical rooms would allow these rooms to be considered unclassified. This unclassified status allows less expensive electrical equipment to be installed in these areas and removes potential explosion hazards from the work environment. The consultant currently working on the project to classify all facilities concurs with the proposed "unclassified" designation and recommended changes. Three design modifications are needed to change the electrical rooms from a classified area to an unclassified area. • Nine electrical rooms require a positive ventilation system with failure alarms. The ventilation systems require supply equipment with environmental controls to keep dust and humidity levels low and exhaust equipment. The power distribution system requires evaluation to ensure that adequate power is available for the ventilation equipment. • A physical separation is required between the digesters and the electrical room. Four electrical rooms require structural modifications to provide the physical separation from the digesters. Physical seals are required for conduit and cable trays entering the electrical room. Structural modifications are also needed to seal doorways opening to classified areas. • Nine electrical rooms require combustible-gas detection systems and portable fire extinguishers. To incorporate these changes, an additional $115,870 is requested for engineering design services. Although exact costs have not been estimated, the proposed changes are far lower in construction costs than the alternative to bring each electrical room up to the requirements for a classified location. Without the proposed electrical room modifications, considerable modifications to the electrical equipment in each room would eventually be required. To bring these electrical rooms up to the classified status would require all new Motor Control Centers with new electrical equipment and new lighting. G NIBIOEVMAenEc deN FepomWOQHN MO M g1.Ce[ R-. � Page 4 Addendum No. 5 Construction Su000rt Services In consideration of the changes to the project from the five addenda, the estimate for the construction support services as proposed in the original scope was evaluated to coincide with this Addendum No. 5. Staff did not present a request for changes in construction support services through previous addenda. Staff postponed this request until the projects were closer to the construction phase when a more accurate estimate of the construction support services could be presented. The changes in construction support services are due to design changes affecting the number of submittals to be reviewed and the quantity of potential questions to be clarified. Since the award of the original PSA in 1993, staff has requested more construction management services from Consultants for all construction projects to support low staffing levels. Staff considered the alternative to not increase the construction support services budget. Construction services are provided at the direct request of the District. The current philosophy is to increase the use of the Consultant during construction. This allows design staff more time to work on other design projects. Not increasing the construction support services budget would require District design staff to spend more time on construction issues and less time on design issues. Staff is requesting changes to the PSA for construction support services as summarized in the table that follows. There are unused construction support funds allocated within the Professional Services Agreement for Job Nos. P1-40-1 and P1-47. Staff requests that these unused funds be reallocated to Job Nos. P247-1 and P2-39. G4.pbtaNYenCPOMFeyb IIN Ad6 Pl1 Ex R. Page 5 0 Summary of Chances in Construction Suotaort Services Job No. Decrease due to decrease in scope $ (21,968) P1.40-1 of work. Job No. Decrease since Job No. P1-47 will $ (14,910) Pl-47 not be constructed. Job No. Increase due to design changes and $ 85,578 P2-47-1 three separate construction projects resulting from this work. Job No. Increase due to design changes and $ 115,664 P2-39 two separate construction projects resulting from this work. NET CHANGE $ 164,364 Action Addendum No. 5 comprises design changes for$115,870 and additional construction support services for a net amount of$164,364. The total value for Addendum No. 5 is $280,234. The following table shows the distribution of funds within the PSA. Project Approved Addendum No. 5 Revised Total PSA PSA' Job No. P1-40-1 $ 173,988 $ (21,968) $ 152,020 Job No. P 1-47 $ 398,662 $ (14,910) $ 383,752 Job No. P2-47-1 $ 396318 $ 85,578 $ 481,896 Job No. P2-39 $ 523,276 $ 231,534 $ 754,810 Total $ 1,492,244 $ 280,234 $ 1,772,478 'Includes both design and construction support services. Staff requests the approval of Addendum No. 5 to Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1, Job No. P140-1, and Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-1, for $280,234 for a total not to exceed $1,772,478. ALTERNATIVES Staff considered the alternative to design and construct the modifications to the digester area electrical rooms through a separate project. This alternative would not meet the schedule requirements of the Digester Rehabilitation project and G NlplppaMgpMa pall Repm P=lIN AddS FIMI Um R..;a.a,emaa Page 6 would add complexity to coordinate work between consultants and contractors. Giving the project to another consultant could expose Lee & Ro to liability since their design would be based on a future change to the area classification. Staff resolved that the best alternative would be to issue an addendum to the existing project and keep the work together. CEQA FINDINGS This project is exempt per CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(B). The Notice of Exemption was filed with the County Clerk on December 15, 1993. ATTACHMENTS Professional Services Agreement Status Report Summary of Scope of Work Changes -Addendum No. 4 Budget Information Table— Job No. P1-40-1 Budget Information Table —Job No. P247-1 Budget Information Table—Job No. P2-39 Proposal Letter WTS:jam GPnlglcbalAgenda Draft ReperlsWDC11199 AWS P1401.doc G:MVWME endaonlleepm�IINAddSPI.d- aenwa_ eMN Page 7 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. P140-1 and P247-1 Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems, and Process Evaluations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 Total Project Budget: PSA dollars spread over P1-40-1 P1-47 P2-47-1 and P2-39 Consultant: Lee&Ro.Inc. Start Date of Project: June 1993 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 12/8193 Original Studies and design for tasks that will generate four construction projects, $1,160,000 $1,160,000 PSA Job Nos.P140-1,P2-47-1,P1-47 and P2-39. P140-1 and P247-1 provides for the design of 23 tasks for miscellaneous projects at Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 including trickling filter rehab,filtrate routing, building structural and ventilation improvements,drainage Improvements and odor control,electrical equipment upgrades,gate replacements,site improvements and other safety and operational Improvements. PI-47 provides a 12kV distribution system for support facilities at Pl,and fire alarm system upgrades. 132=39 rehabilitates 7 digesters and provides PLC control system for all digesters at P2 1 Change type of swhchgear for Job No.P1-47 rescinded $1.160,000 829/95 2 Conduct study for Job No.P147 $11,168 $1,171,166 925/96 3 Revise P1-47 design to install electrical equipment in a building. $76,801 $1,247,967 1120196 4 Provides for 12 items of changes to the scope for P1-40-1, P247-1 and $244,277 $1,492,244 P2-39. See table titled"Summary of Scope of Work Changes for Addendum No.4"(attached). Pending 5 Provides for design changes for Job No.P2-39 to modify digester electrical $280.234 $1,772,478 rooms to allow designation of'unclassified"per the requirements of the revised fire protection code for wastewater treatment facilities. Provides far additional construction support for Job Nos. P247-1 and 132-39. WadonWalat W p.dla`e,UOSS&CONTRACTSTI40-1 TSA staWs report AddS.dm SUMMARY OF SCOPE OF WORK CHANGES FOR ADDENDUM NO. 4 APPROVED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN NOVEMBER 1996 JOB NO.ATEM DESCRIPTION JOB NO. P1-40-1 Delete preparation of plans and specifications ITEM 1 for Trickling Filter System Upgrades Delete preparation of plans and specifications ITEM 2 for Filtrate Routing and Nitrogen Mana ement ITEM 12 Project Delays JOB NO, P2-47-1 Revise the design for Activated Sludge Plant ITEM 3 Control System Delete preparation of plans and specifications for Gas Compressor Building upgrades to ITEM 4 code ITEM 5 Revise the design for Outfall level controls Revise the design for motor starter ITEM 6 improvements at 12kV Distribution Center"B" Design ventilation upgrades for a third ITEM 7 electrical building Revise the design of the Plant Water Pump ITEM 8 Station electrical upgrades Revise the design of electrical upgrades at ITEM 9 Power Building"B" Revise the design of the filtrate clarifier to be a ITEM 10 temporary unit ITEM 12 Project Delays JOB NO. P2-39 Revise the design of the Digester Rehabilitation to incorporate seven design ITEM 11 ichanges ITEM 12 1 Project delays N:%.p.dtakngUOBS 8 CONTRAOTST 1-4 1%SUMMARY TABLE ADDEN 04.Eoc Budget Information Table Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-40-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE' BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Consultant PSA $ 300,000 $ 174.000 $ - $ 174,000 $ 173,988 $ (21,968) S 152,020 $ 126,000 83% District-Design Phase $ 200,000 $ 72.000 $ 20 000 $ 92,000 $ 72,000 $ 20.000 $ 92,000 $ 74.000 80% Construction Contract $ 2,298000 $ 257000 $ - $ 257000 $ - $ 0% District-Construction Phase $ 250000 $ 61000 $ - $ 61000 $ 51,000 $ 51,000 $ 0% Contingency $ 120,000 $ (20,000 $ 100000 $ - $ 0% Other $ 12000 $ 11000 S 11000 $ 11,000 $ 11000 $ 0% TOTAL $ 3,060,000 $ 695.000 $ - $ 695.000 $ 307.988 $ (1.968)1 $ 306,020 $ 200,000 29% A transfer of funds from contingency to design phase is requested. Staff and General Counsel performed unanticipated work to clarify issues regarding the original bids and to rebid the project. H W1.dlaWrgWudgNWudgetW add5 Rni 05.29A41 Budget Information Table Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-47-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE' BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%( District -Design Phase $ 326,000 $ 179,000 $ - $ 179,000 $ 179,000 $ 179,000 $ 179,000 100% Design Consultant $ 300,000 $ 406,000 $ 73,909 $ 479.909 396,318 $ 85,578 $ 481,896 $ 338,000 70% Construction Contract $ 2,938,000 $2,512,600 $ 2,512,600 $ 1,271,000 $ - $ 1,271,000 $ 0% District- Construction Phase $ 486,000 $ 719,400 $ 719,400 $ 719,400 $ - $ 719,400 $ 0% Contingency $ 655,000 $ 73,909 $ 581,091 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 4.050,000 $4,472,000 $ - $ 4,472,000 $ 2,565,718 $ 85,578 $ 2,651,296 $ 517,000 12% A transfer of funds from contingency to the design consultant is requested. These funds are for the additional construction management services. H'.Wry.tl a4nglobscontract5Np2-3g%udgetbl aM5 Budget Information Table Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-39 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%j Previous Design Costs-Consultant' $ 345,000 $ 330,000 $ 330,000 $ 330,000 $ • $ 330,000 $ 330,000 100% Previous Design Costs-Staff$ 90,000 $ 90.000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ - $ 90,000 $ 90,000 100% Consultant PSA $ 700,000 $ 920,000 $ 920,000 1 $ 523,276 $ 231,534 $ 754,810 $ 437,000 58% District-Design Phase $ 40,000 $ 105,000 $ 105,000 $ 523,276 $ - $ 523,276 $ 40,000 8% Construction Contract $ 9,875,000 $16.000,000 $ 16,000.000 $ $ - $ - $ 0% District- Construction Phase $ 50,000 $ 1,161,000 $ 1,161,000 $ 227,028 $ - $ 227,028 $ 0% Contingency $ 2,358.000 $ 2,358,000 $ - $ - $ 0% Other $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ $ - $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 11,100,000 $21.000,000 $ - $21,000,000 $ 1,693,580 $ 231,534 $ 1.925,114 $ 897,000 4% Design was completed for Digester Rehabilitation in 1989 under a separate PSA. The project was put on hold in 1989 due to excess capacity available in four newly constructed digesters. The project was restarted with a larger scope of work in 1993. h:\wp,ftWngYob contactslp2-39W dgNEl adds JAy Attachment "A" gp,1715,WM Cry d Mxla T6 G 917153e70 7d:(82619U-S6f Fax:(BZB)8I?TJIS LEE& RO, Inc. 1199 Sme1 FUN~naafi Giy of Mmay,CA 91749 October 15, 1998 Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention: Ms. Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager Subject: Request for Project Amendment 295A Job Nos. P147, P1-40-1, P2-47-1, and P2-39 Dear Ms. Sevenandt: The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)extensively revised the Standard for Fire Protection in Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities (NFPA 820) in 1995. Many of the changes are clarifications or simplifications to the existing NFPA; however, some of the changes are more extensive. This update affects digester areas and their hazardous classifications, in particular Job No. P2-39, which is currently under design. The District has requested changes in the scope of work to upgrade nine (9) digester electrical rooms to meet the NFPA 820 unclassified area requirements. Various project elements have been revised which require changes in the Scope of Work. We propose reduction in construction support services to Job Nos. P140 and P7-47, while additional funding is necessary for construction support services to Job Nos. P247-1 and P2-39. As you directed, we are submitting our fee proposal for additional engineering, design, and construction support tasks associated with these changes. LEE & RO requests increases in manhours and fees for the following elements: JOB NO. 122-39 - DIGESTER REHABILITATION NFPA 820 DESIGN CHANGES The District has requested the additional construction documents and support for modifications and upgrades to the digester electrical rooms to modify the environments to declassify area. The scope of work will be expanded to include the following improvements which require additional plans and specifications. 1. All nine (9) electrical rooms require ventilation improvements to meet the NFPA 820 requirements of a continuous positive ventilation system with failure alarms. The systems should provide a minimum of six (6)air changes per hour, utilizing supply and exhaust fans. An additional ten (10) mechanical drawings will be required for ventilation improvements. 2. Gas tight partitions are required between the electrical room and digester or pump room providing a physical separation. Four (4) electrical rooms require walls to separate rooms from the Orange County Sanitation District -2- October 15, 1998 following digesters E. M, N. and Q. All openings, such as conduit trays and doors, between electrical rooms and pump rooms will have to be sealed. An additional five (5) structural drawings will be required for structural improvements. 3. Investigate electrical distribution system and make necessary upgrades for and to supply power to new ventilation systems. 4. Sealing all conduits leaving and entering electrical rooms is required. An additional ten (10) electrical drawings will be required to detail this work. 5. All the electrical rooms require combustible gas detection systems and fire extinguishers. 6. Make changes to the drawings and specifications under production as necessary to produced a coordinated set of construction documents. Also, revise the project construction cost estimate. For the above design services, LEE & RO requests a fee increase of$115,870. JOB NOS. P1-40-1, P1-47, P2-47-1, AND P2-39 -CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES The above projects have changed substantially since award of the contract in 1993. The design scope of work has been changed to meet the updated requirements but the construction support scope of work has never been revised to reflect the design changes. As the project complexity and components increase the construction support increases. Due to the additional project components, project complexity, and the District's construction management policy changes we will have additional submittals, RFIs, construction meetings, and as-built drawing work. The following is a summary of construction support service fees: Job No. P1-40-1: The Plant Security and the Trickling Filter projects were deleted from the scope of work. We propose that the construction support fee be reduced by $21,968 to $9,360. Original Construction Support Fee: $31,328 Proposed Construction Support Fee: $ 9,360 Job No. P1-47: The designs were completed for the 12 kV Power Distribution Upgrades and Laboratory Electrical Upgrades but the construction has been postponed indefinitely. We propose that the construction support fee be reduced by $14,910 to $11,225. Original Construction Support Fee: $26.135 Proposed Construction Support Fee: $ 11.225 Job No. P2-474: This project includes four(4)elements which Addendum No. 4 changed the design scope of work increased the design complexity considerably. An additional HVAC area and HVAC monitoring controls were added to scope of work increasing the submittals and construction support effort by $14,742. The Outfall Level element was revised to include a complete control system increasing the submittals and construction support effort by $20,130. The Plant Water was revised adding additional electrical upgrades to facility increasing the submittals and construction support effort by $23,191. The Activated Sludge Control System was revised adding additional wiring, PLC controls, safety devices, and alarms to scope of work increasing the submittals and construction Orange County Sanitation District -3- October 15, 1998 support effort by $27,515. In summary, we propose an increase in the total construction support effort by$85,578 to $106,120. Original Construction Support Fee: $ 20.542 Proposed Construction Support Fee: $106,120 Job No. P239: This project includes two elements which Addendum No.4 changed the design scope of work increased the design complexity. Added Pressure and level instrumentation and electrical upgrades increasing the submittals and construction support effort by $54,544. The NFPA 820 upgrades discussed in this proposal increase the submittals and construction support effort by $61,120. We propose a total increase of$115,664 for Job No. P2-39 making the total construction support fee to $183,016. Original Construction Support Fee: $ 67.352 Proposed Construction Support Fee: $183,016 Our fee proposal matrices (2 sheets) for these additional services are enclosed. For all additional services described above, we are requesting a net compensation increase of$280.234. We have included the fee breakdown in the format you requested as follows: Change Per Addendum 5 Engineering Services, (direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 155%and direct expenses), $259,551 not to exceed Subconsukant Fees and costs, $0 not to exceed Profit $20,683 Total, Not to Exceed $280,234 We appreciate your consideration of this proposal. If you have any questions, please call Lee Badertscher or me at (626) 912-3391. Very truly yours, LEE & RO, Inc. M. Steve Ro, P.E. President cc: Lee Badertscher Attachments c,Pvorav OWCHAN�OWauc as LEE & RO, INC. MANHOUR ESTIMATE (Lahor Breakdown) CRem: OCSD 29S Proj ecl rai, PI-00-1;P1-47; P2-47-1; and P2-39 N 39 Digatrr DsO, Pomr 51cabantcel F,Itttmvl DId,16utMv TO/'AI' 6ar��NrY ' ➢.,m 5lrvavnl Desw Dvriga f&Cll,rigil . fvvm,anlim )IRS 41 HR TMALS ROFFS910XAL oglonr9 8 8 8 24 5141 S1.2511 EVSIo.r8 40 120 40 200 4 74 P.M ogle.,] 120 30 100 40 290 42.68 S12,3]] egier,r6 10 10 38.70 Z97 E.&.5 0 34.14 so ogienr4 Ho 20 IN 29.9 n951I vglvnrJ 0 2502 s0 v31enr2 0 21.0 So e61vnr1 0 1810 so UKTOTAL _89H 229 40 59 62A R6a28 CtlMM nhekiae6 0 29.58 In eeh.feYo5 120 IN 1060 4a0 2S.42 S11j" . M4 heaR 100 80 IN 21.0 53,893 .heltlao3 0 18.20 So aho141av3 0 15.17 so .held..l 0 12.89 SO URTOTAL 220 1 100 240 60 0 630 N SI5,0>8 6nlolelnll,e5 0 29.5s SO dnlont.IK,3 0 IH.20 s0 dn,Watralb,2 16 16 32 I5.1] 5485 dmiehlnlive 1 11 1100 s0 URTOTAL 16 0 16 0 0 32 54H5 OTAL HOURS 4d4 198 4" 10H SO 1 1.276 341992 OTAL S/SASK 13301 6703 16J36 323E 2257111 41H9 erh.d B55%) 20713 10189 25321 mno 3498 6493 rofit lB%) 52,]36 S1967 DX3 S6591 A60I 58,546 'reel Con Sim S50 S250 S20 S20 LiA OTALSTASK U6,953 SISM0 S45,240 58,922 56,2J5 I VYgVUNON4 LEE&AO,INC. M AM1 IlOUN 4.5I UTAiE (1 I .PrnLaonn) HCIi[nl: OI S11 2" nn vn,- ruwp•1-fr,rl-n>.p nen rf_le C(Irv9pt.7 'FtT1Wl11:P]OQS P(bl pHT %{p{ M�la r 6k A Fls Wn L of wmma rWtl TrvW[I Id AV P L 0 MAkI[eY ROOa INAL t au I d Pump S4M0l}ap HdS143p P, 4rN l Elueptl -,9AblM TM' u M, # nr Gel�n &WV• Ylna w11nry WfM« '': IIPSNan.. Ipl,• fryl ap.. ; UpplVa upPip 1«hpMMW1 Vs4MM •/�IOO.n 1 1 . . 1 n W, wl M[S I131 n% (l.t Inl ]0 m NoI Im m a 111 K.,. $110. GiLr.l Im) (m) n31 l,1, m a .1 70Im IA m w .LY Illsf> Gllm[6 ON IN nl (1) eNmtt[a 0 m.11 b Lnllm.[I 0 mL b gMml 0 Ilm b I—TAL I,fl Pl) 1«I 101 110 lel Ifl ]Il Ifl 1}f0 rnni'Im6 m9 b I"FttMl[I[nf =' N UWQTAL . Ivl hll10 10 nl 1'. nml Ivl PII10 u m uo ]o m mf I5'. m}e «1m .,1.1 10 S 10 m f1 ¢n M4 n1U o 0 0 o Io 1 20 b o 0 f1 fn. E n011 OOII (TI Iml Im ILI 101 ml ap 11, bl 1P 10a1 NM .]IY .Sfb mm 121, mb INS III. IISm 11m .(.I) nsm uN, .,1] NAN «sr 1I= SIN,sm ]m slo 11m fm N0 �.., m1e ALLS.VB o10/m) nn}1n ImN91 w.«n f«.,.1 sm".I wo. Avn I IN'.. lfybf sB}f1 I•: I«}L 1 Wq�39]tlar54 PDC COMMITTEE Meeengoate I Tosd.oroir. 12-3-98 12-1698 AGENDA REPORT Item Number I[em Num vacua-sz Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwl , irector of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Project Manager SUBJECT: SANTA ANA TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 1-17, BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4, AND SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-21 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish a budget of$90,000 for Contract No. 1-2-4; and (2) Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with DGA Consultants, to perform engineering services and prepare a project report for the Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-17, Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-2-4, and Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for an amount not to exceed $190,545, SUMMARY The District has three sewer projects that require TV inspection of trunk lines and physical inspection of the manholes. These inspections are used to determine the extent of deterioration of the sewer trunk and manhole structures due to sewer gases and age. The inspection will provide information for the following projects: • Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-17 • Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-2-4 • Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21 The Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-2-4 was not budgeted in FY98-99 because it was not known until recently that the interior pipe lining is in bad shape. The District will establish a construction budget in the FY99-00 CIP for any rehabilitation work after the project report is complete. This current budget is for a study only. Three proposals were received on October 9, 1998. Staff recommends award of a Professional Services Agreement to DGA Consultants, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $190,545. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table for each project. R. , eaaae Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-17; Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21) ® This item has not been budgeted (Revised 1998-99 Budget, zone 11, Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation,Contract No. 1-2-4) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds ❑ Not applicable (information item) The budget for Contract 1-2.4, in the amount of$90,000, will be funded from the CORF 1998-99 budget reserves. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OCSD has three sewer projects that are in need of repair. To assess the needs for rehabilitation, OCSD requires a videotape and physical inspection of the interior of manhole structures and sewer pipe walls for each project. The 1989 Master Plan recommended that rehabilitation of aging interceptor sewers be part of the District's on-going program of repairing and lining of previously unlined and unprotected sewer pipe and manhole structures. Contract No. 1-17: The Santa Ana Trunk was constructed in 1952. The sewer was built to convey flow from the City of Santa Ana to Plant No. 1. The inspection will include 35 manholes and approximately 16,000 feet of unlined sewer. Contract No. 1-2-4: The Bushard Trunk was constructed in 1954 to convey interplant flow from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2. It also served to reroute the Magnolia Trunk Sewer to Plant No. 2. The Magnolia Trunk flows previously went to Plant No. 1 by means of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station. In 1983, three projects were undertaken to repair portions of the Bushard Trunk sewer. Several manholes and the sewer were lined with polyurethane coatings. The inspection will include 18 manholes and approximately 20,000 feet of sewer. Contract No. 7-21: The Sunflower Interceptor sewer was constructed in 1972. The Sunflower Interceptor sewer is one of two major trunk sewer systems serving the former District No. 7 drainage area. The inspection will include 39 manholes and approximately 20,000 feet of sewer. Rw amen Page 4 A project report will be prepared for each trunk sewer and will include the TV and physical inspection of the interior of manhole structures and sewer pipe walls. Three engineering firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the required services. All three proposals were received on October 9, 1998. Staff reviewed the proposals and ranked them according to pre-selected criteria. DGA was selected as the top ranked firm. Following the ranking the proposal fee envelopes were opened. The results are as follows: Firm Fees 1. DGA Consultants Inc. $190,545 2. Boyle Engineering Corporation $202,961 3. Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates $377,384 ALTERNATIVES Not known at this time. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable at this point. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services 3. Consultants Proposals RLC:jam:jo G:WgIoba6Agenaa Dreg RepoftXPDU-17 AR,111898.Cot R� � Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Contract No. 1-17 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) (OCSD Staff) Project Development $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ 82,000 $ - $ 82,000 $ 15.000 18 (OCSD Staff) Planning Studies $ 50,000 S 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 0 (Consultant) Planning Studies $ 259000 $ 259000 $ 259.000 S 58,292 $ 58,292 0% (OCSD Staff) Design $ 450,000 $ 450000 $ 450.000 (Consultant) Design $ 295000 $ 295,000 $ 295.000 $ - $ - $ (Contractor) Construction $ 4,230.000 $ 4.230,000 $ 4.230.000 S - $ - $ OCSD Construction Management $ 145,000 $ 145,000 $ 145.000 $ - $ - $ OCSD Construction Inspection $ 240,000 $ 240.000 $ 240,000 $ - $ $ (Design/Construction) Contingency $ 1.743.500 $ 1743500 $ 1743,500 $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ 7.494.500 $ 7494.500 $ - $ 7,494.500 1 1 $ 82,000 Is 108292 $ 190,292 $ 15,000 1 8% H,W, alaa oe contracla\t-1T1-17bWgelbI BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Contract No. 1-2-4 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSEDTOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT7TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) (OCSD Staff) Planning Studies $ 35,000 $ 35000 $ 35,000 $ 35000 0% (Consultant) Planning Studies $ 55,000 $ 55000 $ 47479 $ 47479 0% (OCSD Staff) Desi n $ $ - $ (Contactor) Construction $ OCSD Construction Mena emant $ $ - $ - $ (OCSD Staff) Inspection $ $ - $ - $ (Design) Contingency $ $ - $ - $ TOTAL $ - $ -Is 90,000 $ 90,000 $ - $ 82,479 1 $ 82,478 $ 1 0% Hwp.4ta4ngUobs&conlreclsV3-411-2.4 bWgelbl BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation Contract No. 7-21 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE:. REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) (OCSD Staff) Project Development $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ - $ 13,000 0% (OCSD Staff) Planning/Studies $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 0% (Consultant) I g/Studies $ 5.000 $ 5.000 $ 85,000 $ 90,000 $ 84,774 $ 84,774 0% Staff) $ 88,000 $ 88 000 $ 88,000 $ - $onstructionment $ 46,000 $ 46,000 $ 46.000 s $ - $ctor)ction $ 225,000 $ 225.000 $ 225,000 =C $ - $ - $ /Construction)ency $ 114,000 $ 114000 $ 100,000 $ 14,000 $ - $ - $ 1 $ 491.000 $ 491.000 Is - $ 491.000 $ 13,000 1 $ 99,774 $ 112.774 $ 0% H:wpdtWngiobs6Lontractsq-2117-21 budgetbl ' STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-17 Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract 1-2-4 Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21 The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • DGA Consultants, Inc. • Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates • Boyle Engineering, Inc. Three consulting firms submitted proposals on October 9, 1998. The proposals were reviewed and evaluated using a rating system from 1 to 10, 10 being the highest for each of the following four rating criteria. The maximum possible points for each consulting firm per individual reviewer was 40 points. 1. Proiect Approach and Understanding of Scope. Rates the company's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Experience of Team Members on Related Projects. Comparison of firm's experience in past projects. Important is the Consultants ability to have performed similar work for another agency. 3. Applicable Proiect Experience. A comparison of the company's experience and expertise as it relates directly to the design of sewer trunk lines. 4. Scheduling. Understanding of tasks to be performed and completed to meet the schedule per Scope of Work. Ratings are shown in attached table "Staff Evaluation of Proposals for Consulting Services." After reviewing and grading the proposals, the three consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved and fee. The firms are, in order: Firm Points Fee 1. DGA Consultants, Inc. 155 points $190,545.00 2. Robert Bein, William Frost &Associates 135 points $377,384.00 3. Boyle Engineering, Inc. 126 points $202,961.00 After ranking the proposals, the review panel opened the sealed fee envelopes submitted by the candidates. Staff selected DGA Consultants, Inc. because of their expertise and knowledge in the rehabilitation of sewers and manhole structures and their fee to do the project was the lowest. Staff recommends the approval of a PSA with DGA Consultants, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $190,545.00 to provide engineering services and a project report. ftftnWWWV.GkbnS W&CONTIIAOTS%IAM-17 stuffmulualb dpWmalsAw STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 1-17 Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract 1-2-4 Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21 M G Q M m LL Ay d LL O tl�l d _W m e U 0 — Q W 306 Reviewer A 31.0 27.0 24.0 Reviewer B 33.0 29.0 25.0 Reviewer C 29.0 27.0 25.0 Reviewer D 31.0 25.0 26.0 Reviewer E 31.0 27.0 26.0 Total Score (200 Points Max.) 155.0 135.0 126.0 Workforce Estimate (man-hours) 1,542 2,839 1,204 100% Design Completion Proposed 5 months 5 months 5 months Proposed not to exceed Fee $190,545.00 $377,384.00 $202,961.00 Average Cost per Hour $123.57 $132.92 $168.57 Hwm. Amen P,e lRW-« m 0. TABLE 11/19/98 CONSULT . kDGR 2130 E. 4th St. Ste. 100 • Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714/568-0200 • Fax 714/568-5434 October 9, 1998 MIL DAVID LUDWIN, P.E. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708.4018 SUBJECT: FEE PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT REPORT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SANTA ANA TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 1-17; BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 1-24 AND SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-21 Dear Mr. Ludwin, Enclosed herewith is DGA Consultants, Inc,proposed fee for the three subject projects. Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal- Very truly yours, DGA CONSULTANTS, INC. Donald Greek, P.E. President COMBINATION OF ALL THREE PROJECTS PROJECT REPORT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SANTA ANA TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 1-17, BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION,CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4 SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION,CONTRACT NO. 7-21 * �C014SULTINGp CES OR` � ` T " ACOLISUL INC1 ... Burdens?Will,o o '2 ?�, vy(r.yy`12 8 0:06" g' T�'",� • B�ed-Iabo�Mracfl�i Z-4-r• 052.90 . •iY' i Bu dmedTa�o>° oatra�` 21' '$ 52:Q0, y Oveilieadaf M^; > ^ S67�4F:00 S r k 123 9;OO �x Y S 7 Subs��nces7�I ' " `� � �S �y286iD6 t•- f �F� • V: TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED $190,545.00 Owl CONSULTANTS•INC. CONSULT . DGA 2130 E. 4th St. Ste. 100 • Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714/568-0200 • Fax 714/568-5434 October 9, 1998 MR.DAVID LUDWIN, P.E. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-4018 SUBJECT: FEE PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT REPORT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-21 Dear Mr. Ludwm, Enclosed herewith is DGA Consultants, Inc,proposed fee for the subject project, presented in the format and under separate cover, as requested. Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. Very truly yours, DGGA eCONSULTANTS, INC. Gtl� Donald Greek, P.E. President PROJECT REPORT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION CONTRACT NO. 7-21 _^#O$PfiSUL`1*_ INCa.:.._ _ Bill CIIC� BbOP •..aa� "R+Rc�•/5 ;�.:�_y�, a �_...; . _ a ST �Vtl Sa b _ TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED CONSULTANTS•INC. CPI California Pipeline Inspection 8032 Westman Avenue Whittier, CA 90606 (562) 699-5474 SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION,CONTRACT NO. 7-21 • CCTV Inspection ...........Approximately 26,0001meal feet @ $0.81 per foot. TOTAL $21,060.00 • Manhole Inspection .......34 each @$270.00 per Manhole Inspection TOTAL $9,180.00 TOTAL QUOTE FOR THIS PROJECT$30,240.00 Included in the cost for CCTV 1. Traffic control(labor, supervision and equipment). 2. Computer generated report of all findings using"LineView/LineFix"software designed specifically for this type of application 3. Color videotapes on VHS format. 4. Color photos captured from videotapes indicating general condition and specific defects. 5. All equipment and supervision required to meet all CAI, OSHA and District safety regulations related to this project Included in the cost for Manhole and Structure Inspection 1. Traffic control(labor supervision and equipment). 2. All safety equipment and supervision required by CAL-OSHA and the District for Confined Space Entry. 3. Written report of all findings, dimensions and defects as required 4. Color photos of defects and general condition of Manholes/Structures. 5. Frame and cover inspection. Schedule CPI,Inc.will require FOURTEEN workdays to complete this project using one crew to conduct both the CCTV inspection and Manhole Inspection at the same time. (Additional Crews are available if needed) Report The final CCTV report will be processed and submitted within four days of completion of wort. CONSUL . DGR 2130 E. 4th St. Ste. 100 • Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714/568-0200 • Fax 714/568-5434 October 9, 1998 MR.DAVID LUDWIN,P.E. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 927084018 SUBJECT: FEE PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT REPORT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR BUSS ARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 1-2.4 Dear Mr. Ludwig, Enclosed herewith is DGA Consultants,Inc, proposed fee for the subject project, presented in the format and under separate cover, as requested Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. Very traly yours, DGA CONSULTANTS,INC. " y Donald Greek,P.E. President PROJECT REPORT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION CONTRACT NO. 1-2A 170 `CON�S�yUyyL G SEROR ;. B- 61-1- S TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED $47.479.00 CON SU LTANTS'INC. CPI California Pipeline Inspection 8032 Westman Avenue Whittier, CA 90606 (562) 699-5474 BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 1-2-4 • CCTV Inspection ...........Approximately 12,870 lineal feet @ $0.81 per foot. TOTAL $10,424.00 • Manhole Inspection .......14 each @$270.00 per Manhole Inspection. TOTAL $3,780.00 TOTAL QUOTE FOR THIS PROJECT$14,204.00 Included in the cost for CCTV: 1. Traffic control(labor, supervision and equipment). 2. Computer generated report of all findings using "LineView/LineFix" software designed specifically for this type of application. 3. Color videotapes on VHS format. 4. Color photos captured from videotapes indicating general condition and specific defects. 5. All equipment and supervision required to meet all CAL OSHA and District safety regulations related to this project. Included in the cost for Manhole and Structure Inspection: 1. Traffic control(labor supervision and equipment). 2. All safety equipment and supervision required by CAL-OSHA and the District for Confined Space Entry. 3. Written report of all findings,dimensions and defects as required. 4. Color photos of defects and general condition of Manholes/Structures. 5. Frame and cover inspection. Schedule CPI,Inc.will require SIX workdays to complete this project using one crew to conduct both the CCTV inspection and Manhole Inspection at the same time. (Additional Crews are available if needed) Report The final CCTV report will be processed and submitted within four days of completion of work. a CONSUL 2130 E. 4th St. Ste. 100 • Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714/568-0200 • Fax 714/568-5434 October 9, 1998 MR.DAVID LUDWIN,P.E. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-4018 SUBJECT: FEE PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT REPORT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SANTA ANA TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION,CONTRACT NO. 1-17 Dear Mr.Ludwin, Enclosed herewith is DGA Consultants,Inc,proposed fee for the subject project, presented in the format and under separate cover,as requested Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposaL Very truly yours, DGGAA CONSULTANTS,INC. ' Donald Greek, P.E. President PROJECT REPORT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR SANTA ANA TRUNK SEWER REHABH,ITATION CONTRACT NO. 1-17 Il ER C0 SI A 5 1 Y DGA't(> J6• B�deaedlaG"'[�,r" - ;I� •840' '�- , °' . t fibtb �°4 3 d500 � ' u"b i S 2 2 7Y;sutti TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED $ 58,292.00 CONSULTANTS•INC. S I CPI California Pipeline Inspection 8032 Westman Avenue Whittier, CA 90606 (562) 699-5474 SANTA ANA TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 1-17 • CCTV Inspection ...........Approximately 17,200 lineal feet @ $0.81 per foot. TOTAL $13,932.00 • Manhole Inspection .......33 each @$270.00 per Manhole Inspection. TOTAL $8,910.00 TOTAL QUOTE FOR THIS PROJECT$22,942.00 Included in the cost for CCTV: 1. Traffic control(labor, supervision and equipment). 2. Computer generated report of all findings using "LineView/LineFix" software designed specifically for this type of application. 3. Color videotapes on VHS format. 4. Color photos captured from videotapes indicating general condition and specific defects. 5. All equipment and supervision required to meet all CAI, OSHA and District safety regulations related to this project. Included in the cost for Manhole and Structure Inspection: 1. Traffic control(labor supervision and equipment). 2. All safety equipment and supervision required by CAL-OSHA and the District for Confined Space Entry. 3. Written report of all findings, dimensions and defects as required. 4. Color photos of defects and general condition of Manholes/Structures. 5. Frame and cover inspection. Schedule CPI, Inc.will require EIGHT workdays to complete this project using one crew to conduct both the CCTV inspection and Manhole Inspection at the same time. (Additional Crews are available if needed) Report The final CCTV report will be processed and submitted within four days of completion of work. PDC COMMITTEE Meedng Da[ Toad.of Dir. ._.` 12-3-98 12-1698 r AGENDA REPORT ac"DS3 'Ji Orange County Sanitation Di FROM: David Ludwl hector of Engineering Originator: Bill Brooks, Engineer SUBJECT: REPAIR AND REHABILITATION OF MANHOLIiS ON EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, FOUNTAIN VALLEY CHANNEL TO ORANGETHORPE AVENUE; EUCLID RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, ELLIS AVENUE TO EDINGER AVENUE; EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MARIAN AVENUE TO CARBON CREEK CHANNEL, CONTRACT NO. 2-34R GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$345,300 for a total project budget of$1,735,900, for Contract No. 2-34R; and (2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (3) Approve award of contract to Sancon Engineering II, Inc. SUMMARY The plans and specifications for the project were approved at the September 23, 1998 Board Meeting. The engineer's estimate for the project was $1,000,000. Three bids were received on October 20. 1998 ranging from a high bid of$1,835,800 to a low bid of $1,310,900, submitted by Sancon Engineering II, Inc. A budget increase of$345,300 is requested to accommodate the higher construction cost and to provide a 10 percent contingency for potential future change orders. The additional funds are proposed to come from the Zone No. 2 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) reserves. The Director of Engineering recommends award of the construction contract to Sancon Engineering II, Inc. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The current $1,000,000 construction budget was approved at the September 23, 1998 Board Meeting. An additional $345.300 is requested. The cost summary is presented in the attached "Budget Information Table" BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (tine item: CIP Collection System Improvement Projects,Zone 2, Item d, page 6). ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This budget amendment, in the amount of$345,300, will be funded from the Zone No. 2 1998-99 budget reserves. Gln191Qbz1Vga1da Draft ReWftT041 RAR 121M de R-rem � Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background: This project rehabilitates 95 deteriorating manholes on the Euclid Trunk Sewer. Rehabilitation consists of installation of a new polyvinyl chloride (PVC) liner within the existing manhole shaft and replacement of the frame and cover. These manholes are in various stages of deterioration and must be repaired to stop the corrosion process. Eventually, sewer gases yell corrode the manholes to the point of structural collapse. The project also replaces 82 manhole frame and covers on the Euclid Relief Sewer and the Euclid Interceptor Sewer because of deficiency reports from the collections maintenance division. The latest design for these manhole covers reduces rainwater and infiltration, thereby increasing the reliability of the sewer collection system. Bid Analysis: Three bids were received on October 20, 1998 ranging from $1,310,900 to $1,835,800. The engineers estimate for the project was $1,000,000. The rehabilitation cost was estimated based upon a new PVC liner being installed within the existing manholes. All bid prices submitted for this manhole rehabilitation were significantly higher than estimated. The District has not recently bid a manhole rehabilitation project of this magnitude and, therefore, had no basis for bid comparison. Although only three bids were received, staff has concluded that the bids received are responsible and justifiable. Staff recommends approval of the budget amendment and award of the construction contract to Sancon Engineering, Inc. ALTERNATIVES If the budget increase is not approved, the remaining alternative is not to proceed with the project. Staff does not recommend this action since the manholes will continue to deteriorate. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. The Final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989, and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Table Information Bid Tabulation & Recommendation BDB:jam:jo:jam G M16loEaMpeMa Dnll Reparu'➢OC UR AR 121M am R-. � Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Fountain Valley Channel to Orangethorpe Avenue; Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue; Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Marian Avenue to Carbon Creek Channel Contract No. 2-34R ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT17ASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%,) Design Consultant(PSA) $ 70,000 S 147,000 $ 147,000 $ 147,000 S 147,000 $ 147,000 t00% CSDOC Staff,Design S 28.000 $ 51,000 $ - $ 51,000 $ 51,000 $ 51,000 $ 51.000 100% Construction Contract $ 730000 $ 1000000 $ 310900 $ 1310900 $ - $ 1310900 $ 1310900 $ 0% CSDOC Staff,Inspection and Constr. Management $ 48.000 $ 96000 $ 96,000 $ - $ 96000 $ 96000 $ 0% Contingency $ - $ 96.600 $ 34.400 $ 131000 $ $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 876,000 $ 1.390,600 $ 345,300 $ 1735,900 $ 198,000 $ 1406.900 $ 1.604,900 $ 198.000 14% K: p.4t %eng�HC2-34Rbudget info October 20, 1998 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 1 BID TABULATION Euclid Manhole Rehab Contract No. 2-34R ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $1.000,000 Construction Contract Budget:$1,000,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Sancon Engineering 11, Inc. $ 1,310,900 2. Miladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. $ 1,693,850 3. Colich & Sons $ 1,835,800 4. $ 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 9. $ 10. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, ra omme ward to Sancon Engineering, in the bid amount of$1,310,900 as the lowest and est bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering Niwp.dtabngVOBS&CONTRACTSU-34RQ-34R Bid Tab.doo Revised 0"9198 OCSD • RO. Box 8127 • Fountain Vallev.CA 927284127 . p141 962-2411 PDC COMMITTEE Mee6o9DaW To9e.of Dir. 12-3.98 1 12-16-98 AGENDA REPORT Av IN-U ber 177?771 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Lud rector of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Project Manager SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF THE MAGNOLIA TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-35R, AND SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 3-11 R GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1)Approve Plans and Specifications for the Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R; and (2) Approve a budget amendment for Contract No. 3-35R in the amount of$3,000,000. SUMMARY The plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R, were completed August 1998. The designer for this project is DGA Consultants Inc. OCSD obtained all city permits in July 1998. The current engineer's estimate for both projects is $6,613,000 and the original construction budget for both projects was $3,750.000. A budget increase for Contract No. 3-35R is required because the consultant received low cost estimates from several rehabilitation contractors during the preliminary design process and the consultant underestimated the costs for this difficult of a project. The cost estimate rose significantly after the contractors received a complete set of plans. This revealed more work than what was first estimated because of the severity of the rehabilitation work and the increased traffic control required for each city. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. The original construction budget for Contract No. 3-35R was $3.5 million. The requested construction budget for Contract No. 3-35R is now$6.5 million. The construction budget for Contract No. 3-11 R remains at $250,000. The current engineer's estimate for construction of both projects is $6,613,000. Page 1 r BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (1998-99 Budget Capital Projects Zone 3, line d) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable. (information item) Staff requests an increase in the construction budget of$3 million for Contract No. 3-35R. The construction budget for Contract No. 3-11 R remains at $250,000. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R. were identified in the 1989 Master Plan for sewer and manhole rehabilitation. Magnolia Trunk Sewer The Magnolia Trunk Sewer was originally designed in November 1950 and constructed in 1951. The trunk sewer is located between Orangethorpe Avenue in Fullerton and Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley. In 1990, the District contracted with PSS Incorporated to videotape the Magnolia Trunk Sewer and conduct a manhole inspection survey with our Maintenance Department. The survey covered approximately 63,000 feet of sewer varying in size from 30 to 78 inches in diameter. Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor The Seal Beach Sewer was originally constructed in 1971. This line was built to convey wastewater by gravity between the Westside Pump Station to the Seal Beach Pump Station. This line was also videotaped and a manhole inspection survey was conducted. The survey identified several of the same conditions in the Magnolia Trunk Sewer manholes but there was no sewer wall damage or deterioration. The survey covered 5,600 feet of sewer, and eight 72-inch unlined manholes. The survey identified the following conditions within the manholes and sewer line: • Softening of the concrete • Bubbles and deterioration in the existing polyvinyl chloride (PVC) lining in the sewer pipe • Exposed aggregate in the concrete base and shelves • Deterioration of the main line concrete channel and laterals • Deterioration of manhole frames and covers Page 2 The Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R and the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R will: • Remove existing deteriorated structures and replace with new reinforced concrete manhole shaft walls with PVC liner. • Restore manhole concrete shelves and laterals with PVC liner. • Restore concrete mainline channels. • Provide PVC liner repairs for 39-inch to 78-inch diameter sewers. Conclusion In November of 1997, DGA Consultants estimated Contract No. 3-35R at $3.5 million. After completing the plans and specifications in March 1998 and receiving city permits, the current engineer's estimate is $6,613,000 for both projects. The engineer's estimate escalated for the following reasons: • The Consultant received low cost estimates from several rehabilitation contractors that did not reflect the difficulty and severity of the rehabilitation work during the preliminary design phase. • The sewer pipe liner repair kits is the only method of spot repair that can be used with flows in the sewer. Costs for this product have gone up 35% in price since the consultant originally did the estimate. Although the costs have increased significantly, staff has determined that this sewer project is greatly needed and that the work must be performed to prohibit further and more costly deterioration. ALTERNATIVES There are no cost effective alternatives. Construction of a new sewer would cost $60,000,000 to $70,000.000. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table -Contract No. 3-11 R Budget Information Table - Contract No. 3-35R RLC:jam:jcr:jam Gnntglob•IWgentle Dreft RepodWPDCG-35R AR 100398.eoc Page 3 E BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer Contract No. 3-35R ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL ExPENomm COMPLETE BUDGET. BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Project Development (OCSD) $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 $ 32.000 100% City Permits $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30.000 It 30.000 $ 30,000 0% Planning Studies (OCSD) $ 62,000 $ 62.000 $ 62.000 $ 62.000 $ 62,000 $ 62,000 100% Planning Studies (Consultant) $ 44,000 $ 41,000 $ 44.000 $ 44,000 It 44,000 $ 44,000 100% Design (OCSD) $ 171,000 $ 245.000 $ 245,000 $ 245,000 $ 245,D00 $ 192,187 78% Design (Consultant) S 300,000 1 $ 300.000 $ 300,000 $ 299,280 $ 299.280 $ 294.280 98% Construction (OCSD) $ 402,000 S 402.000 $ 402.000 $ - § Construction (Contractor) § 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 6,500,000 Contingency Design/Construction $ 786.400 $ 712.400 $ 712.400 $ 712,400 $ 712,400 TOTAL $ 5.327.400 $ 5.327.400 $ 3.000.000 $ 8,327,400 $ 1,424,680 S 1.424,680 $ 624,g87EJ44% H:wp eumneUaC63513 i3514 liu40H01 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation Contract No. 3-11 R ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASN AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION .TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION '. TO DATE TODATE(%) Prolecl Development (OCSD) $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7.000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 100% Coy Permils $ 13.000 $ 13.000 $ 13,000 1 $ 13,0001 $ 13,000 Planning Studies (OCSD) $ 27,000 $ 27.000 It 27,000 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 100% Planning Studies (Consultant) $ 8.000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 100% Design (OCSD) $ 40,000 $ 40.000 $ 40.000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 31,500 79% Design (Consultant) $ 37,000 $ 37.000 $ 37.000 It 36.150 $ 36.150 $ 34,150 94% Constmction E $ 46.000 $ 46,000 S 46,000 $ $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 68,200 $ 68,200 $ 68,200 $ 68,200 $ 66,200$ 495.200 $ 496,200 $ 496,200 $ 199,350 $ 199.350 $ 107,650 1 %% H'.wp.dW WngU&M WRW IR BufteW e PDC COMMITTEE M T1]2G ernN N1B Db�AGENDA REPORT Orange County Sanitation Dis trict IJ FROM: David Ludor of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN PHASE 3, PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, JOB NO. J-40-4, ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) WITH ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates (ESA) for preparation of Phase 3 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-4, to provide additional environmental services in the amount of $90,457 for a total not to exceed $352,571. SUMMARY Development of a "Preferred Alternative" for the Strategic Plan has increased the number and range of treatment and disposal alternatives that must be analyzed in the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Additionally, the June 1998 Ocean Discharge Permit warrants additional analysis of marine ecology and water quality impacts. Staff recommends that the following additional work will be included in the Program EIR: • Analyze a total of twelve scenarios consisting of three treatment alternatives, with and without the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System combined with two disposal alternatives, instead of the five to seven alternatives in the original scope of work. • Analyze impacts of a pipeline between Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 to supply secondary effluent for Phases 2 and 3 of the GWR System. • Analyze impacts of a new outfall located approximately one mile from the existing oufall. • Perform in-depth assessment of marine environment impacts beyond that presented in 1989 EIR. These proposed efforts reinforce the technical analysis, making the EIR less likely to be challenged during public review. Because of the additional work for the Strategic Plan the certification of the EIR schedule will be September 1999. Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total additional fee proposed for this work is $90,457, increasing the PSA amount •� not to exceed $352,571. Please refer to the attached Professional Services Agreement Status Report. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (CORF Budget, Line Item, Spedal Projects le) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) See attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The additional work to be performed under proposed Addendum No. 2 is discussed in more detail below. Treatment and Discharge Alternatives: The original scope required five to seven planning alternatives for treatment and disposal alternatives to be addressed. Development of the Strategic Plan "Preferred Alternative" has expanded the range of feasible alternatives to include: Six Treatment Scenarios with and without the GWR system, Phase 1 • Enforce 1998 NPDES Permit Limits • Continue 50 Percent Secondary Treatment Policy • Implement Full Secondary Treatment Two Disposal Scenarios • Existing 120-inch outfall plus emergency discharge to the 78-inch outfall at an estimated frequency of once every three years by the year 2020, • New Ocean 06tfall; assumed to be located one-mile away from existing 120-inch outfall diffuser Additionally, ESA will address the proposed pipeline between District's Plants No. 1 and 2 for Phases 2 and 3 of the GWR System. This alternative was added to the Strategic Plan to make use of the existing secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 2. The ten additional discharge scenarios that were considered in the Strategic Plan will be described but not analyzed in the EIR. The focus will be on alternatives that could potentially avoid or lessen impacts of the "Preferred Alternative." Page 2 Preferred Alternative: r On September 23, 1998, the Board of Directors directed Staff to proceed with ' preparation of the Strategic Plan Draft EIR designating the "Preferred Alternative" consisting of: • Level of Treatment to meet 1998 Ocean Discharge Permit limits, • Use of the 78-inch ouffall for emergency discharge without disinfection, with an estimated discharge frequency of once every three years by the year 2020, • Use of seven million gallons of in-plant storage to hold peak flows, and • Participation in Phase 1 of the GWR System Marine Environment Analysis and Public Health Impacts: The original scope of work assumed that the analysis would be similar to that presented in the 1989 EIR analysis. The consultant was to use baseline assumptions and information from the 1989 EIR to estimate impacts. However, the EPA used a different model to establish our 1998 permit limits. Staff recommends a more in-depth analysis of potential impacts to the marine environment and public health, given the EPA's analysis. This work effort will help to avoid public criticism for using a less rigorous methodology than was used by the EPA. ESA will update the 1989 Program EIR using new marine monitoring reports and data to be collected near the 78-inch outfall. ESA will also conduct similar modeling performed in 1989 and compare it the EPA modeling criteria used in the 1998 permit. Additional Work Items, Addendum No. 2: Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Alternatives $28,876 Marine Environment/Outfall Analysis $31,099 Time Extension, Meetings and Support 3$ 0,482 Total, Addendum No. 2: $90,457 ALTERNATIVES Do not issue Addendum. Without this additional work performed, the analysis may not fully support the Strategic Plan Alternatives, and the EIR may be further subject to challenge during the review process. Moreover, the project may be subject to future revisions that will be difficult and costly to implement later in the process. CEQA FINDINGS The Notice of Preparation for a Draft Programmatic EIR for the Strategic Plan was filed for public review and comment on October 23, 1997. ATTACHMENTS 1. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 2. Budget Information Table 3. Proposal letter from ESA dated October 30, 1998 JDH:jo:jam 1W K)datalWglobam9enda Draft Reporls%PDCVJ 04 AR 1239&d= Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT JOB NO. J-40-4 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT7TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) EIR Preparation, Consultants $ 342,000 $ 377,000 $ 262.114 $ 90,457 $ 352,571 $ 72,003 20% EIR Preparation,Staff $ 69.000 $ 293,050 $ 293,050 $ 293.050 $ 70.737 24% Materials B Misc. $ 11.950 $ 11.950 $ 11,950 $ 7,038 59% TOTAL $ 411,000 $ 682,000 $ - $ $ 567,114 $ 90,457 $ 657,571 $ 149.778 23% Wexcel.41e1engten&ttmpinUJOAWben4um No.2 SWgetbl.As RwW GUMS Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-40.4 Phase 3 Strategic Plan Total Project Budget: $ 682,000 Consultant: Environmental Science Associates, Inc. Start Date of Project: April 23. 1997 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 4/23/97 Phase 3 Strategic Plan — Program Environmental Original PSA Impact Report, J-40-4 237,138 237,138 11/16/98 1 Additional Environmental and Technical Services 24,976 262,114 Increase the number and range of treatment and Proposed 2 disposal alternatives; perform in-depth marine 90,457 352,571 analysis; provide additional environmental support %VadonWata1kwp.dUvmgU0BS 8 CONTRACT84STRAT PIANU404WdendumV Wdei dum Statue Repod.d= 11/16/98 Revised 05/1498 Environmental Science i E I bsesiares October 30, 1998 Mr.David Ludwin,P.E. Director of Engineering Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92727-6127 Subject: Strategic Plan Phase 3 -Job J-404 EIR Preparation Contract Addendum No. 2 Dear Dave: This letter presents ESA's request for modification of the above-referenced contract for EIR preparation on the District's Strategic Plan Update. The modification is necessary to incorporate several additional work tasks and effort beyond our current contract scope of work. These additional tasks are necessitated by changes to the project description,issuance of the revised NPDES permit that warrants additional effort in the marine ecology and water quality impact analysis,and schedule delay,all of which occurred after the original EIR scope was developed and contracted. This second contract addendum modifies the scope of work,budget and schedule as described in the attachment. Please call the if you have any questions. ESA shares the District's goal of proceeding with the CEQA phase of the Strategic Plan process as soon as possible. Sincerely, Leslie oulton Project Manager Director Water and Wastewater Utility Services 225 Bush Srm ,,Suim 17M S Fnncism.Uikmu 941M (415)996.5900 f.x 996-0332 email:made esuwo<om ' OCSD STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE—EIR (Phase 3—Job J404 EIR Preparation) ADDENDUM NO,2 ESA will undertake the following additional tasks and effort in preparation of the EIR on the District's Strategic Plan Update. In summary,these additional tasks are necessitated by changes to the project description,issuance of the revised NPDES permit that warrants additional effort in the marine ecology and water quality impact analysis,and schedule delay,all of which occurred after the original ERR scope was developed and contracted. This addendum modifies the scope of work,budget and schedule. ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF WORK Task C.1—Proposed Pipeline between Plant No.2 and GWR System • Describe the setting and analyze the impacts of the proposed pipeline in Brookhurst Avenue from Plant No.2 to GWR System facilities. This new project component will be addressed as appropriate throughout the EIR,but most notably in the analysis of land use,traffic,air quality,noise,and public health and safety. • ESA will consult with the District team to describe potential alternatives to this pipeline and, if necessary to explain the reason that other alternatives may be infeasible. Task C.2—Additional Treatment and Discharge Alternatives • Analyze 12 treatment and discharge alternatives at an equal level of detail (instead of 5-7) that represent the potential range of treatment processes,effluent volume,concentration,and mass emissions. Analyze the affect of implementing or not implementing the GWR Project. Scenario 1 is the District's preferred alternative. 1. Current NPDES permit(TSS 17,000 mt/y) Existing OutfaIV78" With GWR 2. Current NPDES permit(TSS 20,000 mt/y) Existing OutfaIV78" No GWR 3. Current NPDES permit(TSS 20,000 mt/y) New Outfall With GWR 4. Current NPDES permit(TSS 20,000 only) New Outfall No GWR 5. Full Secondary Treatment(TSS 17,000 only) Existing OutfaIV78" With GWR 6. Full Secondary Treatment(TSS 12,000 mUy) Existing OutfalV78" No GWR 7. Full Secondary Treatment(TSS 12,000 only) New Outfall With OWR 8. Full Secondary Treatment(TSS 12,000 mt/y) New Outfall No GWR 9. 50:50 Blend Treatment(TSS 20,000 ratty) Existing OutfaIV78" With GWR 10. 50:50 Blend Treatment(TSS 20,000 mt/y) Existing Outfa1V78" No GWR 11. 50:50 Blend Treatment(TSS 20,000 mt/y) New Outfall With GWR 12. 50:50 Blend Treatment(TSS 20,000 ratty) New Outfall No GWR ESA-960436 I 11/03/98 OCSD Strategic Plan Update EIR Addendum No.2 All 12 alternatives will be presented in the Project Description and addressed wherever appropriate throughout the EIR but most notably in the analysis of land use,air quality,energy, noise,effluent water quality,marine environment,public health,and cross media trade-offs. • In the EIR alternatives chapter,review the alternatives development and screening process. Describe the other treatment and discharge alternatives(up to 10)considered but eliminated from further consideration and explain the reasons for rejection. The focus will be on those alternatives capable of meeting the basic project objectives that could potentially avoid or lessen impacts of the preferred project. The analysis will describe any additional impacts implementation of the alternatives might generate. Task C3—New Outfall Location • Describe the setting for and analyze the impacts of a new outfall that is located approximately one mile away from the existing outfall(rather than adjacent and parallel to the existing outfall as previously described in the 1989 EIR and assumed in the original Update EIR scope). Analysis will be based on site information for one of the existing ocean monitoring program sites. Task CA—Additional Marine Environment Impact Analyses • To evaluate water quality impacts, [in addition to conducting a similar analysis to that used in the 1989 EIR),describe the relationship between initial dilution and oceanographic conditions and evaluate a range of potential initial dilutions. Review and discuss the methods used in the EPA Technical Review Document(TRD)and Technical Decision Document (TDD)regarding initial dilution, which supported development of the District's current NPDES permit(1998). • Discuss the relationship between suspended solids mass emissions and transmissivity. Review EPA TRD and TDD methods and discuss. Review and discuss current study by USC at Whites Point Outfall. (Original scope considered suspended solids concentration.) • Analyze the potential impact of projected mass emissions(in addition to concentration)on sediment quality and toxicity for both the existing 120"outfal V78"emergency outfall and the new outfall scenarios. Develop and analyze a range of scenarios to reflect the range of key parameters: initial dilution,current speed,and size of depositional area using the following methods: regression model of sediment quality with effluent quality EPA DECAL model based on effluent deposition and an assumed effluent particle size - foot print approach correlated with mass emissions. • Evaluate the impact of the projected mass emission on benthic biota using current models for commnity response and factors controlling organization. Describe measurements of community composition using the Biological Response Index(in addition to the Infaunal Trophic Index(ITI)used in the 1989 EIR). In addition to evaluation of the Word and Means model(used previously),MEC also will employ the EPA models used in the District's recent NPDES TDD and TRD for estimating impact relative to TSS concentration and mass emission. The analysis will address both the existing 120""outfall/78"emergency outfall and the new outfall scenarios. ESA-960436 2 11/03/98 OCSD Strategic Plan Update EIR Addendum No.2 a ESA/MEC will discuss the relationship between fish disease and mass emissions and attempt to decouple the toxics issue from organics. • Augment the original scope of analysis of cumulative marine water quality effects to address trends in mass emissions and compare mass emissions with non-point source inputs. MEC will also include an analysis of ocean dumping of dredge spoils which could contribute to a cumulative mass load impact. Task C 5—Additional Project Management The EIR/CEQA schedule has been delayed and consequently extended for an additional 14-months. For the extended performance period through August 1999,ESA's Project Management team,Leslie Moulton and Richard Masters, will maintain regular contact with District staff and other consultants. They will manage scope,schedule and budget progress and monitor and report compliance. They will continue to submit written progress reports with each monthly invoice. Task CA—Additional Meetings For the extended performance period through October 1999,ESA will attend team meetings as requested,up to one meeting per month. EFFORT AND COST The additional team effort and cost associated with the additional scope of work tasks described above is presented on the attached spreadsheet. The additional cost is$90,457. With this addendum the total contract cost would increase as follows: Current Contract Addendum (with Addendum No 1) No 2 Total Contract ESA Environmental Services $162,707 $49,237 $211,944 (direct labor+ 183%overhead) Subconsultants $73.396 $32,997 $106,393 Profit $26,011 $8,223 $34,234 TOTAL $262,114 $90,457 $352,571 PERFORMANCE PERIOD The performance period for completion of this scope of work for the CEQA process is extended through October 1999,and is based on the following schedule assumptions. Tasks in italics are the responsibility of OCSD and/or CDM;tasks in plain text font are the responsibility of ESA. ESA-960436 3 11/03/98 OCSD Strategic Plan Update E1R Addendum No.2 The two critical task assumptions for the ADEIR preparation schedule include: receipt of all key project description/Strategic Plan information from CDM and the District by mid-December,and preparation of the effluent quality information for each of the 12 treatment/discharge alternatives by K.Lindstrom by the end of January. Task Timeframe Date Strategic Plan Update Nov—mid-Dec Dec 15, 1998 Find Project Description information Contract made;frcation/ Authorization to Proceed(ATP) Dec 15 NOP follow-up letter Jan Jan 15, 1999 Effluent Water Quality Development For Treatment/Discharge Alternatives(KPL) Jan 'Jan 30 EIR Project Description Chapter—draft Dec—Jan Jan 30 4 wks from receipt of needed information District review 2 weeks Feb 15 ADEIR 4 months from ATP April 15 and receipt of key Pmj.Descr info District Review 4 weeks May 15 Draft EIR preparation 2 weeks May 31 Screencheck EIR review 2 days June 4 Draft EIR publication 1 week June 11 Public Review Period 45 calendar days July 30 FEIR/MMRP Preparation 3 weeks August 20 District Review 2 weeks Sept 3 FEIR Publication 2 weeks Sept 17 Draft Findings Sept 17 EIR certification 2 weeks October 1 ESA-960436 4 11/03/98 OCSD Strategic Plan Update EIR Addendum No.2 OCSD Strategic Plan EIR(lours Estimate Detail 0 ESA STAFF 0 9 m F u u g a g 0 F Fm muk Want: W $IN $95 Ins 56E Us f60 us ASI18: CA New hood.Between Mona < 1 16 1 1 b I I B 1 6 361 M300 SI50 S50 52b f1330 C2 20 a I I U I 1 8 1 8 IMI awlE250 M 5250 an 39 13 .3 New(c:anlllun0on Analnem 6 16 8 a S 5M f50 M S2,578 C.6 Menncl =.Awl lit-NMIIS nil 20 48 10 B 116 E10.2a0 s500 75 10 Is C.f P14.1Mene meM I2 60 L 116 $11.180 E500 S210 E210 1 150 fl CA Mood. 1 R- 0 6 IN 11525 EI 500 Sim 1 ) (YfALBFFORT Iicun) 112 W N W d0 s20 DIAL COST$ E $14.M $22w 1 55.720 1 1 E en0 s2,200 M) 9n0 1 WHO I 5800 Kw WJJLJ OCSD Strategic Plan EIR Hours Estimate Detail (continued) SUBCONSULTANTS Rat:,Okltsll Direct PROJECT "OURS z »$22 ? 9 $ GRAND GRAND d E TOTAL ITOTALFEEI Emp3o ebill ma'. (WI Sl% f81 31% fR f123 f60 ASKS: CA NevR lim aelW[en"mn 16 16 32 $2,M f30 f3462 88 f].992 C.2 Tm69nenI4MDim8 cAlu f 32 40 L 16 112 910B f200 SHXI 212 S20 IM C.3 NcrO :flll1 don 8 40 48 f;088 f1701 76 f]2)9 CA M4rimlm IAn2as.NPDE9P l 32 60 M 16 132 E11308 fl $13,005 218 621120 C.$ ml Mem mcnl 16 16 f512 E300 nu 132 SO.264 .6 Meeun I L 16 40 f50 f44)4 144 $17.219 OTAL EFFORT (loon % 156 48 N 16 16 380 900 OTALMM S) 10.176 1;636 3 1 LSM f;000 E960 S3 % ml f3]%] $9% 348 29,4M E2,960 6 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, December 9, 1998, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on December 9, 1998 at 5:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Mike Moreland, Moreland &Associates Thomas Saltarelli, Chair Chuck Acocello, Moreland &Associates John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Julie Prichard, Moreland &Associates Jan Debay, Board Chair Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers Mark Leyes Ryal Wheeler, Foreman Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Mark Mutz, 501 Oper. Engrs. Shop Steward William G. Steiner David Hamilton, Rep: Local 501 Oper. Engrs. Directors Absent: STAFF PRESENT: John M. Gullixson Don McIntyre, General Manager Mark A. Murphy Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Gary Streed, Director of Finance Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Mike White, Controller Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Manager Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Mark Mutz, employee and Local 501 Operating Engineers Shop Steward, and Dave Hamilton, Local 501 Representative, addressed the Committee expressing their viewpoints against broadbanding and pay-for-performance, as well as the performance review process which is pan of these programs. Mr. Hamilton recommended that the Committee read the book entitled Tapp,"which deals with employee performance improvement. OCSD . P.O.Box 8127 . Fantain Valley,CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting f Page 2 December 9, 1998 e (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the October 21, 1998 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Saltarelli advised that there would be no meeting in January and that the next regularly scheduled meeting will be on February 10, 1999. He also advised that there would be a brief closed session this evening. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Don McIntyre reported that he attended a meeting at the City of San Diego Sanitation District a few weeks ago and learned that they have a pay-for-performance program and a gain-sharing program. To say that these programs are not done and do not work isn't entirely accurate, he noted. The program will not work if we do not have the employees' buy-in, and it certainly will not work if our managers are not trained well. Our entire staff must work together in order for the program to be successful. (7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson was not present. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE • Mr. Streed introduced Mike Moreland, Chuck Acocello and Julie Prichard of Moreland & Associates, the District's independent auditors, who were present to answer any questions the Directors had regarding the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)for the year ended June 30, 1998, • The Treasurer's Report for November was placed before the Committee prior to the meeting in accordance with the Investment Policy and Government Code requirements. • The October Treasurer's Report was sent directly to the Board in November because there was no FAHR meeting in November. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources Mike Petennan announced that he attended a legislative luncheon today which Director Mark Leyes also attended. The program reviewed new bills which are expected to be passed by the State Legislature this year. Mr. Peterman highlighted those bills for the Committee, since some of them, if passed, will have an impact on the District. 1 Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 December 9, 1998 (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS • The Director of Communications briefly updated the Committee on a public hearing held on Tuesday night, December 8, 1998, on the Groundwater Replenishment System. About 50 people were in attendance and 9 people spoke, however, none of those who spoke were adamantly opposed to the system. Articles in the Times and Register were very positive. Radio stations that also carried the story were KFWB, KFI, KOCE and KMEX. Channel 4 has also has expressed an interest in the story. • The third phase of the public outreach campaign for the Groundwater Replenishment System begins following the certification of the EIR which should be within the February-March timeframe. • The District's video, "Forty Years of Caring;' has been updated and shortened. It will be used for tours, school presentations and presentations to groups away from the District. Copies are being sent to the cities for the public works departments and city managers to look at. • The second phase of the Speaker's Bureau training has just been completed. Twenty employees have signed up. • Staff is preparing a sheet on earthquake preparedness and what to do if your sewer system becomes damaged or inoperable. Communications is working with GSA and the Orange County health care agency to do a one page sheet which will be distributed to the cities for their citizens. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items A- E) A. FAHR98-78: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 1998: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. B. FAHR98-79: Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR98-80: Receive and file Employment Status Report. D. FAHR98.81: Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1 through September 30, 1998 E. FAHR98-82: Approve changes and additions to Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual END OF CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 December 9, 1998 Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 12(A) through 12(E) under Consent Calendar. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items A- D) A. FAHR98-83: Renew the District's Excess General Liability Insurance Program for the three-year period July 1, 1999 to July 1, 2002, in an amount not to exceed $111,492 each fiscal year Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. B. FAHR98-84: Receive and file the 1998-99 Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter ended September 30, 1998 Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. C. FAHR98-85: Receive, file and approve the Districts' Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 1998, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. D. FAHR98-86: Review and approve the request for proposals (RFP) for consulting services to review the District's sewer service fee program for unassessed and under-assessed parcels as identified on the Assessors database. During discussion, the Committee requested that staff reword the RFP so that it does not exclude any firm that may not have or had a government agency as a client. Also, that a phased approach to government agencies should be used when the program actually takes effect. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation with the modification that the RFP allow the bidders to explain how they propose to be compensated for the project, including any contingencies. (14) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION None. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 December 9, 1998 (15) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (18) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for February 10, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. (19) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by Government Code Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item 19(A)(1)on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 6:55 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item 19 (A)(1). At 7:09 p.m., the Committee reconvened In regular session. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 7:10 p.m. Submitted by:C� AA,, �� ,, I- xL Idnora Crane FAHR Committee Secretary FAHIR COMMITTEE Neetln9orte ToXB9a. 12/9/96 17/16/98 AGENDA REPORT Mtn NuMMr Rem Numper Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 1998 (FAHR98-78) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 1998. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) \NEenWYIYq.E nVlVrn MR1 HflBSLwIF/JRW80x Rw IWIM Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 7 Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of November 1998 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounis November 30, 1998 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAW $ 17,691,874 56 Union Bank Checking Account 340.281 4.4 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1.585.000 4.4 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 18.455,508 5.0 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 279,697,806 4.1 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 8.885 5.4 Debt Service Reserves C Trustees 32.634,593 6.2 Petty Cash 4,400 TOTAL $350,418.347 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Reports GGS:SK:Ic 1MbanW�plWpGbanVierniMFAXe1FAWiBeOxiFAXRBSieCe[ ll : 1017M Page 2 unnnu IN IIIIIIIIII unnnn IIIIIIIIII ol ZXX ..... ❖.,.�.,. XISSHI, .•...❖.4 .❖.❖a .❖.❖o ff ITT TT �.❖.❖. ...., ..... ❖.•. !.... ❖.•.•Q !.... ..... !.❖.❖, !.❖O.Q &XXX !.... ..... ..... ..... • ;4 le F : : ' LAIF 1nk Accts IT Petty Cash O Dist 11 GO Bond Fund 1 � MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 30 November 1998) Liquid Operating Monies (603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: Mp�� $18456,844 Mellon $18:455,508 Historical Cost: PIMCO $18,457,359 Mellon $18,456,551 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.21 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $38,896(0.21%) 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 82% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%) Portfolio Index by Period: 1 Month: 0.41 0.37 3 Months: 139 1.18 12 Months: 5.69 5.12 Year-to-Date: 5.18 4.67 N.A..L11NANCE1210W0Z4K1UQ1 198.RPT MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ending 30 November 1998) Long-Term Operating Monies (203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: pIM $280,276,648 P onO $279,697,807 Historical Cost: PIMCO $278119,813 Mellon $278:059,444 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.39 Of Index: 2.37 15.13 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $6,771,031 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %ofPortfolio•in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return("/u) Portfolio Index by Period: 1 Month: 0.07 (0.17) 3 Months: 2.04 1.95 12 Months: 8.51 8.05 Year-to-Date: 7.65 7.25 K.L IPINANCEWOWOZ4x -771198.RPT OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-NOV-1998 HB1300 8 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,759,940.03 2,758,940.03 14.89% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3,664,387.50 3,664,387.50 19.78% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 3,554,227.00 3,554,227.00 19.19% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN IYR 3,555,589.00 3,555,589.00 19.19% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 1,378,440.00 1,378,440.00 7.44% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 219,702.00 219,702.00 1.19% 0.00 10,662.31 4.85 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 15,131,285.53 15,131,285.53 81.69% 0.00 10,662.31 0.07 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,325,265.63 3,324,222.00 17.95% -1,043.63 210,375.00 6.33 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,325,265.63 3,324,222.00 17.95% -1,043.63 210,375.00 6.33 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 68,037.79 68,037.79 0.37% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ -----___ --------------___ ________________ ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 68,037.79 68,037.79 0.37% 0.00 0.00 0.00 »................ .................. ------- ----------------- ................ ....... NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 18,524,588.95 18,523,545.32 100.00% -1,043.63 221,037.31 1.19 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-NOV-1998 HB1100 1 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CORR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH -173,309.41 -173,309.41 -0.06% 0.00 0.00 0.00 RECEIVABLES 6,223,229.63 6,223,229.63 2.20% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -32,324,062.65 -32,324,062.65 -11.43% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 5,276,681.42 5,276,681.42 1.871 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 1,888,766.25 1,888,766.25 0.671 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS -19,108,694.76 -19,108,694.76 -6.76% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 124,950,145.85 126,769,554.33 44.84% 1,819,408.48 7,955,433.64 6.28 U.S. AGENCIES 41,102,820.73 41,554,610.35 14.70% 451,781.62 2,610,106.16 6.28 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 10,709,550.75 10,727,772.50 3.79% 18,221.75 667,500.00 6.22 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 6,124,578.26 6,069,658.11 2.15% -54,920.15 415,980.52 6.85 FHLMC POOLS 15,512,237.79 15,393,791.12 5.44% -118,446.67 1,069,151.16 6.95 FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,331,600.BB 7,421,161.29 2.62% 89,560.41 461,978.88 6.23 FNMA POOLS 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 0.79% 0.00 137,145.00 6.12 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 268,202.60 269,247.50 0.10% 1,044.90 16,628.56 6.18 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 4,736,455.25 4,676,510.67 1.65% -59,944.58 262,430.98 5.61 BANKING 6 FINANCE 66,788,959.60 66,657,311.40 23.58% -131,648.20 3,975,607.94 5.96 INDUSTRIAL 9,903,780.00 9,351,990.00 3.31% -551,790.00 832,500.00 8.90 UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,672,350.00 2.71% 175,095.00 450,000.00 5.87 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 297,168,138.46 298,806,501.02 105.68% 1,630,362.56 16,854,462.84 6.31 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 3,040,568.44 3,040,568.44 1.08% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ ------------- _____ ________ _________________ _________ _______ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 3,040,568.44 3,040,568.44 1.08% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---=-=.eve=- ------------------ -------= ----------------- ee==............ .....__ NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 281,100,012.14 282,738,374.70 100.00% 1,638,362.56 18,954,462.84 6.67 Page 1 - YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 1 =F07511102 1998/11/30 RUM DATE 12/04/% ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 12.47.14 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 219,702.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMI .000 4.853 AAA 100.000 219,702.00 1.45 99608524T 219,702.00 1.19 3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 4.998 .000 P-1 99.037 3,664,587.50 24.21 313396BU HAT 02/01/1999 3,664,387.50 19.86 1,400,000.00 FED FARM OR BK CONS DISC 5.027 .000 P-1 98.460 1,378,440.00 9.10 313312CJ7 HAT 02/26/1999 113781440.00 7.47 3,600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MIG ASSN DISC 5.095 .000 P-1 98.729 3,554,227.00 23.48 313588BM6 MAT 02/05/1999 3,554,227.00 19.26 200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.212 .000 P-1 99.011 198,022.00 1.30 36959JP23 OVOV1999 198,022.00 1.07 3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DIX 5.229 .000 P-1 98.766 3,555,589.00 23.49 313384BK4 HAT OV03/1999 3,555,589.00 19.27 800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 5.287 .000 P-1 98.282 786,259.78 5.19 34539UNT5 01/27/1999 786,259.78 4.26 900,000.00 GNAC DISC 5.360 .000 P-1 99.an 891,636.75 5.89 37042ENL1 01/20/1999 891,636.75 4.83 90U,000.00 IBM DISC 5.494 .000 P-1 98.113 883,021.50 5.83 44922BN06 01/13/1999 883,021.50 4.78 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.970 .116 1511311285.53 100.00 15,131,265.53 81.99 FIRED INCOME SECURITIES 3,300,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 5.585 6.329 AAA I00.734 3,325,265.63 100.00 912827K72 06.3757. 05/15/1999 DO 05/15/96 3,324,222.00 18.01 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.585 6.329 3,325,265.63 100.00 3,324,222.00 18.01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 OMF07512102 1998/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/98 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 12.47.14 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MAW" VALUE 7. TOTAL TOTAL 4.9" .357 14,456,551.26 100.00 18,455,507.53 100.00 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 3 OCSF07522202 1998/11/30 RUN DATE t IV04/96 ORANGE CTY—LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 12.47.14 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 1 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ CASH B CASH EQUIVALENTS .00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT .000 .000 AAA .000 .00 .00 996085247 .00 .00 2,700,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 4.898 .000 99.634 2,690,118.00 37.54 025815MM0 12/21/19" 2,6900118.00 .88 1,900,000.00 FEDERAL ROME LN MTB CORP DISC 4.979 .000 P-1 99.489 1,868,766.25 26.35 313397TS5 HAT 12/15/1998 1,888,766.25 .62 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.056 .000 P-1 99.678 897,102.00 12.51 36959JMJ9 12/18/1998 897,102.00 .29 1,700,000.00 GIAC DISC 5.222 .000 P-1 99.380 1o689,461.42 23.57 37042EMHI 12/17/1998 1,689,461.42 .BE ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.963 .000 7,165,447.67 200.00 7:165,447.67 2.34 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANXERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NY .000 6.147 A2 %.279 1,992,800.00 .63 0663650N4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 DD 05/11/98 21895,580.00 .62 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MIN .000 5.834 A2 99.531 3o498,635.00 1.16 17120QE80 FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/06/98 3,483,585.00 1.24 .00 FNMA POOL 00313600 .000 .000 AAA .000 .00 .00 31374GKMS 6.160% 05/01/2036 DD 06/01/97 .00 .00 .00 FNMA POOL /0559016 .000 .000 AAA .000 .DO .00 31375MSD6 6.1627, 11/01/203S DO 03/01/96 .00 .00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 4 OCSF07522202 1998/11/30 RUN DATE 12/04/96 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 22.47.14 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 5.3" Al 99.754 1,998,613.60 .66 345397 FLTG RT 08/27/2006 DO 00/27/98 1,994,680.00 .65 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR KTN TR 4 00177 .000 4.370 Al 99.765 6,999,748.00 2.37 345402NJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 00 03/30/% 7,083,315.00 2.32 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP NTS .000 5.598 A2 98.373 3,918,768.50 1.30 370425QV5 FLTG RT 08/28/2003 DO 00/17/98 3,885,733.50 1.27 5,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR HT .000 6.179 A3 100.135 2,999,310.00 1.00 423328AZ6 FLTG RT 04/27/2999 DO 04/27/94 3,004,050.00 .90 4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN .000 5.914 A3 99.890 4,000,000.00 2.33 42333NJN3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 00 04/07/98 3,995,600.00 1.32 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO KTH .000 6.029 AZ 98.648 4,000,000.00 1.32 44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 3,945,920.00 1.29 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTH SR 000570 .000 5.792 A2 99.161 999,188.90 .33 44181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 991,610.00 .32 7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST OEM HITTER SR NOTES .000 5.690 AA3 99.906 7,D03,710.00 2.34 61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/25/2000 DO 02/2S/98 6,993,420.00 2.29 4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al .000 5.612 AAA 98.734 4,736,455.25 2.56 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 OD 06/18/98 4,676,510.67 1.53 7,150,290.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.699 3.633 AAA 99.781 7,127,120.19 2.38 91M273AS 3.6257. 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 7,134,630.86 2.33 10,325,500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.730 3.458 AAA 97.594 10,046,310.47 3.37 9128272M3 3.3752 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 10,077,068.47 3.29 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 4.179 5.974 AAA 104.625 9,034,223.67 2.97 9128272G6 06.2507. 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 8,893,125.00 2.91 19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 4.943 6.353 AAA 104.984 20,012,510.00 6.67 31364CZY7 6.670% 03/27/2002 DO 03/27/97 19,%6,960.00 6.52 5,0V0,V00.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.234 6.794 AAA 126.500 6,233,593.75 2.11 912B1ODE5 11.1252 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 6,325,000.00 2.07 17,100.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 6.954 AAA 107.859 16,388,684.02 6.17 912827025 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO ll/15/91 18,443,889.00 6.03 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 5 OCSFO7522202 1996/11/30 RUN DATE : 12/%/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATING RUN TINE : 12.47.14 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY "NET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- 13,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.436 6.548 AAA 114.547 14,539,266.30 4.98 912827S86 07.SOOX 02/15/2005 DO OVIS195 14,891,110.00 4.87 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES S.553 5.933 AAA 105.344 2,566,119.73 .88 912827365 06.250Y. 08/51/2002 00 09/02/97 2,633,600.00 .86 20,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.569 6.100 AAA 104.500 20,986,875.00 7.16 912827ZS4 06.375% 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 21,422,500.00 7.00 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY SOROS 5.617 9.0" AAA 131.016 61698,250.00 2.28 91281000O 11.875Y. 11/15/2003 DO 30/05/83 6,812,832.00 2.23 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.307 AA3 103.063 1,543,M.00 .51 046003HY8 6.SOOX 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 1,5450945.00 .51 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC HTS 5.760 5.820 A3 98.798 999,730.00 .33 42333HKJO 5.750X 09/25/2001 0D 09/25/96 987,980.00 .32 16,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.783 6.142 AAA 109.844 16,581,067.03 5.70 9128272M1 06.500% 05/31/2002 00 06/02/97 17,040,884.00 5.57 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.244 AM 106.0% 3,613,203.13 1.24 912827250 06.625X 04/30/2002 00 04/30/97 3,713,290.00 1.21 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 5.967 AAA 104.734 5,086,402.25 1.75 9128272LS 06.250Y. OV29/2002 DO OV28/97 5,236,700.00 1.71 6,000,000.00 HATIUt68ANK CHARLOTTE N C NTN 5.882 5.827 AA1 100.390 5,996,400.00 2.02 63858JOE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 6,023,400.00 1.97 1,167,608.05 FHLMC MULTICL HTG P/C L574 E 5.912 5.891 100.156 1,166,165.81 .39 3133TOMS 5.900% 06/15/2017 1,169,629.83 .38 1,888,368.26 CHASE HANATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 5.957 5.804 AAA 100.267 1,884,458.75 .63 163614AE2 5.900% 1L 5/2001 DO I1/15/95 1,893,420.20 .62 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.252 AA3 101.961 2,526,725.00 .85 59018SXP4 6.375Y 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 2,549,025.00 .83 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTN TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.865 AAA 102.298 7,497,255.00 2.56 079867AX5 6.000X 06/15/2002 0O 06/15/98 7,672,350.00 2.51 2,230,006.00 COMMIT TO PUR F 11" DIST 6.011 6.116 AAA 100.563 2,242,543.75 .75 XIFOI1610 6.150% 01/ZS/2029 2,242,543.75 .73 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF07522202 1998/11/30 RUN DATE IV04/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 12.47.24 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 2,480,000.00 COMMIT TO MR FKMA 6.012 6.116 AAA 100.563 2,493,950.00 .83 999AM96 6.150X O1/25/2029 2,493,950.00 .82 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO MR SHIA SF MTG 6.017 6.063 AAA 98.969 6,164,550.75 2.07 DIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 6,185,562.50 2.02 1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 6.032 6.853 A2 203.974 1,293,862.50 .43 37042SQF0 7.125X 05/01/2001 00 05/01/97 1,299,675.00 .42 1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 6.046 6.515 A2 302.843 11018,520.00 .34 37042VOK1 6.7007. 04/30/2001 DD 04/25/96 1,028,430.00 .34 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 6,047 fi.121 AAA 300.641 2,012,812.50 .67 999ACV446 6.1607. 12/25/2028 2,012,812.50 .66 2,000s00O.00 COMMIT TO PUR FMNA DXST B 6.069 6.121 AAA 300.641 2,012,812.50 .67 11FOII&C6 6.160% 12/25/2028 2,012,812.50 .66 268,202.61 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 9" CLA 6.200 6.176 AAA 100.390 268,202.60 .09 31677EAA4 6.2007. 09/01/2001 OD 03/15/96 269,247.50 .09 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLBOS MTN TR 00252 6.232 6.352 BAA1 100.760 2,509,175.00 .84 5ZS17rLMl 6.400% OB/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 2,519,000.00 .82 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNHA SF MTG 6.279 6.440 AAA 100.938 4,545,000.00 1.52 OIN062615 6.5007. 01/15/2029 4,542,210.00 1.48 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL H1TL HT6 ASSN MTN 6.291 6.015 AAA 103.578 4,488,705.00 1.55 31364CNV5 6.23OX 03/01/2002 DO OUO3/97 4,662,010.00 1.52 4,159,997.07 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.297 AAA 200.434 4,164,547.07 1.39 3133TCE95 6.324% 06/15/2032 4,178,051.46 1.37 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 6.330 6.542 A2 103.172 2,031,960.00 .69 073902ANI 6.750% 04/15/2003 2,063,W0.00 .67 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDRS MTN 400196 6.364 6.602 BAA1 100.734 5,039,450.00 1.68 52517P. 6.650% 11/08/2000 DO 21/08/96 5,036,700.00 1.65 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC SR NTS 6.425 6.578 A2 102.614 1,317,629.35 .44 07390UWS 6.750% 051OV2001 DO 04/26/96 1,339,122.70 .44 2,000,000.00 FHLMC KULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.270 AAA 103.674 2,000,888.00 .69 3133TOPV2 6.500X 09/25/2018 2,073,480.00 .68 VLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 7 OCSF07522202 1998/11/30 RIM DATE t 12/04/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 12.47.24 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOW( YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 2,225,602.67 FNLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 162OZ 6.572 6.392 AAA 93.887 2,069,462.73 .69 3133T17A4 6.0007. 11/15/2023 OD 11/01/93 2,089,545.35 .68 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL HATL NTG ASSN MM 6.577 6.357 AAA 104.219 8,012,576.40 2.79 31364CB09 6.625X 04/18/2001 DO 04/18/96 6,337,520.00 2.72 9,000,000.00 PNILIP MORRIS COS NT 6.593 8.902 A2 103.911 9,903,780.00 3.12 718154BB2 9.2507. 0VIS12000 9,351,990.00 3.06 15,273,587.98 FNLMC GROUP IG5-0476 6.628 6.945 AAA 100.787 15,512,237.79 5.15 3I280BQ55 7.000% 02/02/2003 DO 02/O1/98 15,395,791.12 5.03 3,000,000.00 G N A C MED TERM HIS 6.660 8.326 A2 103.590 3,227,070.00 1.04 37042R(Q4 8.6257. 1/10/2000 OD 1/10/95 3,107,700.00 1.02 3,561,645.20 GNMA II POOL 0080088M 6.705 6.793 AAA 101.203 3,639,556.20 1.20 362MCZO 6.875% 06/20/2027 GO 06/01/97 3,604,491.79 1.18 2,444,534.45 GKKA II POOL 60080023 6.869 6.941 AAA 100.844 2,485,022.06 .82 36225CAZ9 7.000% IV20/2026 GO 12/O1/96 2,465,166.32 .81 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 7.992 AAA 165.797 4,029,030.31 1.GO 922810DA 13.250% 05/15/2024 DO OS/15/04 4,144,925.00 1.35 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.102 6.062 297,168,138.46 100.00 298,806,501.02 97.68 ________ _______ ----------------- ________- TOTAL 4.103 6.049 304,333,586.13 100.00 305,971,%8.69 100.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST .1 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 27-MOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 31339IS77 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW HAT 12/11/1998 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES O6-NOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 31364FFMB FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 5.880% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 19-NOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3137006L8 FNMA POOL /0238575 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 19-NOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 31375MSD6 FNMA POOL /0339016 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CN 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 27-NOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827D25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/25/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 30-NOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827D25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 19-NOV-1996 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827R20 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.875► 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 24-NOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827R20 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 Page 1 OCSG000IOO MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ CN 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 24-NOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128272G6 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 25-NOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273AS US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 30-NOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273AO US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,700,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 24-NOV-1998 -2,690,118.00 -2,690,118.00 99.634000 0258ISMM0 12/21/2998 24-NOV-1998 2,690,118.00 2,690,118.00 99.634000 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,700,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 24-NOV-1998 -2,690,119.00 -2,690,118.00 99.634000 025SISMM0 12/21/1998 24-NOV-1998 -2,690,119.00 0.00 99.634000 PC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 24-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 04-NOV-1998 -2,489,291.67 -2,489,291.67 99.571667 02581SM40 12/04/1998 04-NOV-1998 2,489,291.67 2,489,291.67 99.571667 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 04-NOV-1998 -2,489,291.67 -2,499,291.67 99.572667 0258ISM40 12/04/1998 04-NOV-1998 -2,489,291.67 0.00 99.571667 FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 04-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 2 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LASS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 05-NOV-1998 -1,379,735.34 -1,378,735.34 99.481096 313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 06-NOV-1999 1,378,735.34 1,378,735.34 99.481096 B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 05-NOV-1998 -1,378,735.34 -1,378,735.34 98.481096 313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 06-NOV-1998 -1,378,735.34 0.00 98.481096 FC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK O6-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 05-NOV-1998 1,378,735.34 1,378,735.34 98.481096 313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 06-NOV-1998 -1,378,735.34 -1,378,735.34 98.481096 BC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 05-NOV-1998 1,378,735.34 1,378,735.34 98.481096 313312CJ7 HAT 02/26/1999 06-NOV-2998 1,378,735.34 0.00 98.481096 FCC HORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 05-NOV-1998 -1,378,440.00 -1,378,440.00 96.460000 313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 06-NOV-1998 1,370,440.00 1,378,440.00 96.460000 B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 05-NOV-1998 -1,378,440.00 -1,378,440.00 90.460000 313312CJ7 MAT 02/26/1999 06-NOV-1998 -1,378,440.00 0.00 98.460000 FC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 05-NOV-1998 -3,555,589.00 -3,555,589.00 98.766361 313384BK4 MAT 02/03/1999 06-NOV-1998 3,555,509.00 3,555,589.00 98.766361 B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 05-NOV-1998 -3,555,509.00 -3,555,589.00 98.766361 313384BK4 MAT 02/03/1999 06-NOV-1998 -3,555,589.00 0.00 98.766361 FC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 3 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASS PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 05-NOV-1998 -3,556,197.37 -3,556,197.37 98.783260 313384BK4 MAT 02/03/1999 06-NOV-1998 3,556,197.37 3,556,197.37 98.783260 B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO -3,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 05-NOV-199B 3,556,197.37 3,556,197.37 98.783260 313384BK4 MAT 02/03/1999 06-NOV-1998 -3,556,197.37 -3,556,197.37 98.783260 BC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 23-NOV-1998 -3,664,387.50 -3,664,387.50 99.037500 313396BH5 MAT 02/01/1999 23-NOV-1998 3,664,387.50 3,664,387.50 99.037500 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 D.OD LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 23-NOV-1998 -3,664,307.50 -3,664,387.50 99.037500 313396SH5 MAT 02/01/1999 23-NOV-1998 -3,664,387.50 0.00 99.037500 FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 23-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-NOV-1998 -1,093,496.25 -1,093,496.25 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 1,093,496.25 99.408750 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.DOOOOO000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-NOV-1998 -1,093,496.25 -1,093,496.25 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-NOV-1996 -1,093,496.25 0.00 99.408750 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 02-NOV-1996 0.00 O.OD 1.000000000 O.DD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-NOV-1998 -1,093,496.25 -1,093,496.25 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 1,093,496.25 99.408750 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 02-NOV-1998 -1,093,496.25 -1,093,496.25 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 02-NOV-1998 -1,093,496.25 0.00 99.408750 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 03-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 4 OCSGOOO100 MELLON TRUST .1 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,600,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 05-NOV-1998 -3,554,227.00 -3,554,227.00 98.728527 3135888M6 MAT 02/05/1999 06-NOV-1998 3,554,227.00 3,554,227.00 98.728527 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,600,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 05-NOV-1998 -3,554,227.00 -3,554,227.00 98.728527 313588BM6 MAT 02/05/1999 06-NOV-1998 -3,554,227.00 0.00 90.728527 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 04-NOV-1998 -13,915,393.33 -13,915,393.33 99.395667 36959JMG5 12/16/1998 04-NOV-1998 13,915,393.33 13,915,393.33 99.395667 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 04-NOV-1998 -13,915,393.33 -13,915,393.33 99.395667 36959JMGS 12/16/1998 04-NOV-1998 -13,915,393.33 0.00 99.395667 PC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 04-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 25-NOV-1998 -897,102.00 -897,102.00 99.678000 36959JMJ9 12/18/1998 25-NOV-1998 897,102.00 897,102.00 99.678000 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 25-NOV-1998 -897,102.00 -897,102.00 99.678000 36959JMJ9 12/18/1998 25-NOV-1998 -897,102.00 0.00 99,678000 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 24-NOV-1999 -198,022.00 -198,022.00 99.011000 36959JP23 02/02/1999 25-NOV-1998 198,022.00 198,022.00 99.011000 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 24-NOV-1990 -198,022.00 -198,022.00 99.011000 36959JP23 02/02/1999 25-NOV-1998 -198,022.00 0.00 99.011000 Page 5 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,200,000.00 GMAC DISC 04-NOV-1998 -4,173,963.50 -4,173,963.50 99.380083 37042EMH1 12/17/1998 04-NOV-1998 4,173,963.50 4,173,963.50 99.380083 B CHEMICAL BK COMMERCIAL PAPER/I ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,200,000.00 GMAC DISC 04-NOV-1998 -4,173,963.50 -4,173,963.50 99.380083 37042FMHI 12/17/1998 04-NOV-1998 -4,173,963.50 0.00 99.380083 FC CHEMICAL BK COMMERCIAL PAPER/I 04-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GMAC DISC 17-NOV-1998 -891,636.75 -891,636.75 99.070750 37042ENL1 01/20/1999 18-NOV-1998 891,636.75 891,636.75 99.070750 B CHEMICAL BK COMMERCIAL PAPER/I ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,OOD.00 GMAC DISC 17-NOV-1998 -891,636.75 -891,636.75 99.070750 37042ENL1 01/20/1999 18-NOV-1998 -891,636.75 0.00 99.070750 PC CHEMICAL BK COMMERCIAL PAPER/I 18-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,266.41 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-NOV-1998 -5,266.41 -5,266.41 1.000000 996085247 02-NOV-1998 5,266.41 5,266.41 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,266.41 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MG14T 02-NOV-1998 -5,266.41 -5,266.41 1.000000 996085247 02-NOV-1998 -5,266.41 0.00 1.000000 FC 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,686,125.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-NOV-1998 -2,686,125.00 -2,686,125.00 1.000000 9960B5247 04-NOV-1998 2,686,125.00 2,686,125.00 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,686,125.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-NOV-1998 -2,686,125.00 -2,686,125.00 1.000000 Page 6 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST •CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TH200 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996085247 04-NOV-1998 -2,686,125.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 04-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,701,710.18 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-NOV-1998 -4,701,710.18 -4,701,710.18 1.000000 996085247 05-NOV-1998 4,701,710.18 4,701,710.18 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,701,710.18 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-NOV-1998 -4,701,710.18 -4,701,710.18 1.000000 996085247 05-NOV-1998 -4,701,710.18 0.00 1.000000 FC 05-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 68,563.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-NOV-1998 -68,563.75 -68,563.75 1.000000 996085247 09-NOV-1998 68,563.75 68,563.75 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 68,563.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-NOV-1998 -68,563.75 -68,563.75 1.000000 996085247 09-NOV-1998 -68,563.75 0.00 1.000000 PC 09-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,691.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-NOV-1998 -19,691.57 -19,691.57 1.000000 996085247 13-NOV-1998 19,691.57 19,691.57 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,691.57 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-NOV-1998 -19,691.57 -19,691.57 1.000000 996085247 13-NOV-1998 -19,691.57 0.00 1.000000 PC 13-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 105,187.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-NOV-1998 -105,197.50 -105,167.50 1.000000 996085247 16-NOV-1998 105,187.50 105,287.50 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Page 7 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- __________________ ____________________ __________________ 105,187.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-NOV-1998 -105,187.50 -105,187.50 1.000000 996085247 16-NOV-1998 -105,187.50 0.00 1.000000 FC 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,142,621.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-NOV-1998 -2,142,621.66 -2,142,621.66 1.000000 996085247 16-NOV-1998 2,142,621.66 2,142,621.66 1.000000 B -- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,142,621.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-MOV-1998 -2,142,621.66 -2,142,621.66 1.000000 996085247 16-NOV-1998 -2,142,621.66 0.00 1.000000 FC 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 8,363.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 1B-NOV-1998 -8,363.25 -8,363.25 1.000000 996085247 18-NOV-1998 8,363.25 8,363.25 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 8,363.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-NOV-1998 -8,363.25 -8,363.25 1.000000 996085247 18-NOV-1998 -8,363.25 0.00 1.000000 FC 18-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,857.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-NOV-1998 -25,857.01 -25,857.01 1.000000 996085247 18-NOV-1998 25,857.01 25,857.01 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,857.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-NOV-1998 -25,857.01 -25,857.01 1.000000 996085247 18-NOV-1998 -25,957.01 0.00 1.000000 FC 18-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 2,647,978.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-NOV-1998 -2,647,978.15 -2,647,978.15 1.000000 996085247 20-NOV-1998 2,647,978.15 2,647,978.15 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 8 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,647,978.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-NOV-1998 -2,647,978.15 -2,647,978.15 1.000000 996085247 20-NOV-1998 -2,647,978.15 0.00 1.000000 PC 20-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 35,612.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-NOV-1998 -35,612.50 -35,612.50 1.000000 996085247 23-NOV-1998 35,612.50 35,612.50 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 35,612.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-NOV-1998 -35,612.50 -35,612.50 1.000000 996085247 23-NOV-1998 -35,612.50 0.00 1.000000 PC 23-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,978.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-NOV-199B -1, 978.00 -1,978.00 1.000000 996085247 25-NOV-1998 1,978.00 1,978.00 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,978.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 25-NOV-1998 -1,978.00 -1,978.00 1.000000 996085247 25-NOV-1998 -1,978.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 101,591.93 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 23-NOV-1998 -101,591.93 -101,591.93 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 23-NOV-1998 101,591.93 101,591.93 1.000000 B 23-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 17-NOV-1998 -6,164,550.75 -6,164,550.75 98.632812 OIN060619 6.000% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 6,164,550.75 6,164,550.75 98.632812 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 01-SEP-1998 8,721,132.77 8,721,132.77 102.601562 OIN0626AS 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -8,721,132.77 -8,721,132.77 102.601562 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 9 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-MOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 01-SEP-1998 8,721,132.77 8,721,132.77 102.601562 01N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 8,721,132.77 0.00 102.601562 FCC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.0000000DO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 01-SEP-1998 -4,527,070.29 -4,527,070.29 1DD.601562 O1N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -4,527,070.29 0.00 100.601562 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC GOLD SF 06-OCT-1998 -4,745,546.68 -4,745,546.88 99.906250 02RO606B1 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 4,745,546.88 4,745,546.88 99.906250 B MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 06-OCT-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.906250 02RO606B1 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -4,745,546.88 0.00 99.906250 PC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC GOLD SF 07-OCT-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500 D2RO706BO 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -2,817,031.25 -2,817,031.25 102.437500 BC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 03-NOV-1998 -2,031,960.00 -2,031,960.00 101.598000 073902AHI 6.7508 04/15/2003 06-NOV-1998 2,D31,960.00 2,031,960.00 101.598000 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 03-NOV-1998 -7,975.00 -7,875.00 101.598000 073902AHI 6.750% 04/15/2003 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 101.598000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC 03-NOV-1998 -2,039,835.00 -2,039,835.00 101.598000 073902AH1 6.750% 04/15/2003 06-NOV-1998 -2,039,835.00 0.00 101.598000 Pepe 10 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST ., CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA DIST B 18-NOV-1998 -2,012,812.50 -2,012,812.50 100.640625 11F0116C6 6.160% 12/25/2028 23-DEC-1998 2,012,812.50 2,012,812.50 100.640625 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 11TH DIST 17-NOV-1998 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500 IIF0I1610 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.5625D0 B BEAR STEARNS 8 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 757,499.42 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0496 07-OCT-1998 -775,963.47 -775,963.47 102.437500 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 775,963.47 775,963.47 102.437500 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 757,499.42 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0496 07-OCT-1998 -1,620.21 -1,620.21 102.437500 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 102.437500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00' LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 757,499.42 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0496 07-OCT-1998 -777,583.68 -777,583.68 102.437500 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 -777,583.66 0.00 102.437500 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0496 07-OCT-1998 -1,034,618.75 -1,034,618.75 102.437500 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 1,034,618.75 1,034,610.75 102.437500 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0496 07-OCT-1998 -2,160.28 -2,160.28 102.437500 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 102.437500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 9GO-0496 07-OCT-1998 -1,036,779.03 -1,036,779.03 102.437500 Page 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IRV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LASS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31283GRRO 7.000% 07/01/2026 DD 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 -1,036,779.03 0.00 102.437500 PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP YGO-0496 07-OCT-1998 -1,034,618.75 -1,034,618.75 102.437500 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DD 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 1,034,618.75 1,034,618.75 102.437500 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0496 07-OCT-1998 -2,160.28 -2,160.28 102.437500 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 102.437500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0496 07-OCT-1998 -1,036,779.03 -1,036,779.03 102.437500 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 -1,036,779.03 0.00 102.437500 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,225,602.67 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 09-NOV-1998 -2,069,462.73 -2,069,462.73 92.984375 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 13-NOV-1999 2,069,462.73 2,069,462.73 92.984375 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,225,602.67 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 09-NOV-1998 -4,451.20 -4,451.20 92.984375 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 13-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 92.984375 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,225,602.67 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 09-NOV-1998 2,069,462.73 2,069,462.73 92.984375 31337`17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 13-NOV-1998 -2,069,462.73 -2,069,462.73 92.984375 BC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,225,602.67 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 09-NOV-1998 4,451.20 4,451.20 92.984375 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 13-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 92.984375 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 12 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE:•USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 2,225,602.67 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 09-NOV-1998 -2,069,462.73 -2,069,462.73 92.984375 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 13-NOV-1998 2,069,462.73 2,069,462.73 92.984375 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,225,602.67 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 09-NOV-1998 -4,451.20 -4,451.20 92.984375 3133TI7A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 13-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 92.984375 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,225,602.67 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF SER 1620Z 09-NOV-1998 -2,073,913.93 -2,073,913.93 92.984375 3133T17A4 6.000% 11/15/2023 DO 11/01/93 13-NOV-1998 -2,073,913.93 0.00 92.984375 FC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 13-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 03-NOV-1998 -20,012,510.00 -20,012,530.00 105.329000 31364CZY7 6.670% 03/27/2002 DO 03/27/97 19-NOV-1998 20,012,510.00 20,012,510.00 105.329000 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 03-NOV-1998 -103,054.44 -183,054.44 105.329000 31364CZY7 6.670% 03/27/2002 DO 03/27/97 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 105.329000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 03-NOV-1998 -20,195,564.44 -20,195,564.44 105.329000 31364CZY7 6.670% 03/27/2002 DO 03/27/97 19-NOV-1998 -20,195,564.44 0.00 105.329000 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1998 -3,267,858.00 -3,267,858.00 108.995900 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 12-NOV-1999 -3,267,858.00 0.00 108.995900 FC BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 -5,618,327.17 -5,618,327.17 106.329400 9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 09-NOV-1998 -5,618,327.17 0.00 106.329400 FC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 09-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 13 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,480,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 17-NOV-1998 -2,493,950.00 -2,493,950.00 100.562500 999ACW396 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,493,950.00 2,493,950.00 100.562500 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 17-NOV-1998 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500 999ACW420 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500 B BEAR STEARNS a CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,230,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 17-NOV-1998 2,242,543.75 2,242,543.75 100.562500 999ACN420 6.150% 01/25/2029 25-JAN-1999 -2,242,543.75 -2,242,543.75 100.562500 BC BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 18-NOV-199B -2,012,812.50 -2,012,812.50 100.640625 999ACW446 6.160% 12/25/2028 23-DEC-1998 2,012,812.50 2,012,812.50 100.640625 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 19-OCT-1998 -2,017,343.76 -2,017,343.76 100.867188 999ACW453 6.160% 11/25/2028 23-NOV-1998 2,017,343.76 2,017,343.76 100.867188 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 19-OCT-1998 -2,017,343.76 -2,017,343.76 100.867188 999ACN453 6.160% 11/25/2028 23-NOV-1998 -2,017,343.76 0.00 100.867188 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 23-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 -12,600.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JUL-1998 12,600.00 12,600.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 -12,600.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 0.00 100.000000 Page 14 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST _ CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 -12,600.00 100.000000 9128212M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1998 12,600.00 12,600.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 -12,600.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 30-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 13-NOV-1998 2,091,005.00 2,091,005.00 99.571666 025SISM40 12/04/1998 13-NOV-1998 -2,091,005.00 -2,091,005.00 99.571666 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 13-NOV-1998 2,600.50 2,600.50 99.571666 02581SM40 12/04/1998 13-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.571666 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,100,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 13-NOV-1998 2,093,605.50 2,093,605.50 99.571666 02581SM40 12/04/1998 13-NOV-1998 2,093,605.50 0.00 99.571666 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 13-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 19-NOV-1998 398,286.67 398,286.67 99.571667 0258ISM40 12/04/199B 19-NOV-1998 -398,286.67 -398,286.67 99.571667 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 AMERICAN EX CA CP DISC 19-NOV-1998 888.33 988.33 99.571667 025SISM40 12/04/1998 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.571667 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 19-NOV-1998 399,175.00 399,175.00 99.571667 025SISM40 12/04/1998 19-NOV-1998 399,175.00 0.00 99.571667 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 03-NOV-1998 2,665,119.00 2,665,119.00 98.708111 313397S77 MAT 12/11/1998 04-NOV-1998 -2,665,119.00 -2,665,119.00 98.708111 S CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 03-NOV-1998 21,006.00 21,006.00 98.708111 313397S77 MAT 12/11/1998 04-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 98.708111 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 03-NOV-1998 2,686,125.00 2,686,125.00 98.708111 313397S77 MAT 12/11/1998 04-NOV-1998 2,686,125.00 0.00 98.708111 PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 04-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 298,226.25 298,226.25 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 -298,226.25 -298,226.25 99.408750 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 376.75 376.75 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.408750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-NOV-1998 298,603.00 298,603.00 99.408750 313397T35 MAT 12/15/1998 12-NOV-1998 298,603.00 0.00 99.408750 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 03-NOV-1998 1,686,485.00 1,686,485.00 99.205000 313397T68 MAT 12/18/1998 04-NOV-1998 -1,686,485.00 -1,686,485.00 99.205000 S DEUTSCHE BANK SECS CORP ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 16 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST - CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 03-NOV-1998 3,126.11 3,126.11 99.205000 313397T68 MAT 12/18/1998 04-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.205000 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 03-NOV-1998 1,689,611.11 1,689,611.11 99.205000 313397T68 MAT 12/18/1998 04-NOV-1998 1,689,611.11 0.00 99.205000 PC DEUTSCHE BANK SECS CORP 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-NOV-1998 13,915,393.33 13,915,393.33 99.395666 36959JMG5 12/16/1998 19-NOV-1998 -13,915,393.33 -13,915,393.33 99.395666 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-NOV-1998 32,736.67 32,736.67 99.395666 36959JMG5 12/16/1998 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.395666 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-NOV-1998 13,948,130.00 13,948,130.00 99.395666 36959JMG5 12/16/1998 19-NOV-1998 13,948,130.00 0.00 99.395666 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 GMAC DISC 19-NOV-1998 2,484,502.08 2,484,502.00 99.380083 37042EMHI 12/17/1998 19-NOV-1998 -2,484,502.08 -2,484,502.08 99.380083 S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 GRAC DISC 19-NOV-1998 5,834.03 5,834.03 99.380083 37042EMH1 12/17/1998 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.380083 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 GMAC DISC 19-NOV-1998 2,490,336.11 2,490,336.11 99.380083 37042ENHI 12/17/1998 19-NOV-1998 2,490,336.11 0.00 99.380083 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 17 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,448,198.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-NOV-1998 7,448, 198.25 7,448,198.25 1.000000 996085247 02-NOV-1998 -7,448, 198.25 -7,448,198.25 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,448,198.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-NOV-1998 7,448, 198.25 7,448,198.25 1.000000 996085247 02-NOV-1998 7,448,198.25 0.00 1.000000 PC 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,093,496.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 1,093,496.25 1.000000 996085247 03-NOV-1998 -1,093,496.25 -1,093,496.25 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,093,496.25 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 1,093,496.25 1.000000 996085247 03-NOV-1998 1,093,496.25 0.00 1.000000 PC 03-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,031,178.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-NOV-1998 4,031,178.15 4,031,178.15 1.000000 996085247 04-NOV-1998 -4,031, 178.15 -4,031,178.25 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,031,178.15 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-NOV-1998 4,031,178.15 4,031,178.15 1.000000 996085247 04-NOV-1998 4,031,178.15 0.00 1.000000 PC 04-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29,878.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-NOV-1998 29,878.00 29,878.00 1.000000 996085247 06-NOV-1999 -29,878.00 -29,878.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29,878.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O6-NOV-1998 29,878.00 29,878.00 1.000000 996085247 06-NOV-1998 29,878.00 0.00 1.000000 Page 10 „ OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST -. CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,867,208.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O6-NOV-1998 2,867,208.64 2,867,208.64 1.000000 996085247 06-NOV-1998 -2,867,200.64 -2,867,208.64 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,067,208.64 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-NOV-1999 2,867,208.64 2,867,208.64 1.000000 996095247 06-NOV-1998 2,867,200.64 0.00 1.000000 PC 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,563,677.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-NOV-1998 1,563,677.31 1,563,677.31 1.000000 996085247 09-NOV-1999 -1,563,677.31 -1,563,677.31 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.00000000D 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,563,677.31 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-NOV-1998 1,563,677.31 1,563,677.31 1.000000 996065247 09-NOV-1990 1,563,677.31 0.00 1.000000 PC 09-NOV-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,982,034.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-NOV-1998 2,982,034.95 2,982,034.95 1.000000 996085247 12-NOV-1998 -2,982,034.95 -2,982,034.95 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,982,034.95 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGHT 12-NOV-1998 2,982,034.95 2,982,034.95 1.000000 996085247 12-NOV-1998 2,902,034.95 0.00 1.000000 FC 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,306,041.46 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-NOV-2998 2,306,041.46 2,306,041.46 1.000000 996085247 19-NOV-1998 -2,306,041.46 -2,306,041.46 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,306,041.46 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-NOV-1998 2,306,041.46 2,306,041.46 1.000000 Page 19 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996085247 19-NOV-1998 2,306,041.46 0.00 1.000000 PC 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,593.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-NOV-1998 3,593.76 3,593.76 1.000000 996085247 23-NOV-1998 -3,593.76 -3,593.76 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,593.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-NOV-1998 3,593.76 3,593.76 1.000000 996085247 23-NOV-1998 3,593.76 0.00 1.000000 PC 23-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,588,532.07 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-NOV-1998 2,588,532.07 2,588,532.07 1.00ODD0 996085247 24-NOV-1998 -2,588,532.07 -2,588,532.07 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,588,532.07 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-NOV-199B 2,580,532.07 2,589,532.07 1.000000 996085247 24-NOV-1998 2,588,532.07 0.00 1.000000 PC 24-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -64,101.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-NOV-1998 64,101.02 64,101.02 1.000000 996085247 25-NOV-1998 -64,101.02 -64,101.02 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -64,101.02 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-NOV-1998 64,101.02 64,101.02 1.000000 996085247 25-NOV-1998 64,101.02 0.00 1.000000 PC 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-NOV-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 30-NOV-1998 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Page 20 OCSGOOOlOO MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-NOV-1999 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 30-NOV-1998 3.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 30-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -101,591.93 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 24-NOV-1998 101,591.93 101,591.93 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO O6/26/1997 24-NOV-1998 -101,591.93 -101,591.93 1.000000 5 24-NOV-199B 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 -4,601,601.54 -4,601,601.54 102.257812 OIN0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 4,585,916.44 4,585,916.44 102.257812 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -15,685.10 -15,685.10 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 4,601,601.54 4,601,601.54 102.257812 O1N0626AS 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -4,527,070.29 -4,527,070.29 102.257812 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 74,531.25 74,531.25 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1999 4,601,601.54 4,601,601.54 102.257812 0IN0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 4,601,601.54 0.00 102.257812 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF O6-OCT-1998 -4,746,289.06 -4,746,289.06 99.921875 02R0606A3 6.D004 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 4,709,921.88 4,709,921.88 99.921875 SC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -36,367.18 -36,367.18 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 06-OCT-1998 -4,746,289.06 -4,746,289.06 99.921875 02R0606A3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -4,746,289.06 0.00 99.921875 FCC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 14-OCT-1998 0.00 D.DD 1.000000000 D.DD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 06-0CT-1998 4,746,209.06 4,746,209.06 99.921875 02RO606A3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -4,709,921.88 -4,709,921.88 99.921875 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 36,367.19 36,367.10 1.000000000 0.00 Page 21 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC GOLD SF 06-OCT-1998 4,746,289.06 4,746,289.06 99.921875 02RO606A3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 4,746,289.06 0.00 99.921875 PC MORGAN STANLEY i CO INC, NY 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 4,705,468.75 4,705,468.75 99.062500 02R0606B1 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.062500 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -40,078.13 -40,078.13 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 4,705,460.75 4,705,468.75 99.062500 02R0606B1 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 4,705,468.75 0.00 99.062500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 17-NOV-1998 6,142,578.13 6,142,578.13 98.281250 02RO60613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 -6,191,328.13 -6,191,328.13 98.281250 S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- -48,750.00 -48,750.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 2,814,453.13 2,814,453.13 102.343750 02RO706BO 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -2,817,031.25 -2,817,031.25 102.343750 S GREENNICH CAP MKTS, NEW YORK ----------- -2,578.12 -2,578.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 -2,814,453.13 -2,814,453.13 102.343750 02RO706BO 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.343750 SC GREENNICH CAP MKTS, NEW YORK ----------- 2,578.12 2,578.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 2,814,453.13 2,814,453.13 102.343750 02RO706BO 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -2,827,032.25 -2,917,031.25 102.343750 S ----------- -2,578.12 -2,578.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 2,814,453.13 2,814,453.13 102.343750 02RO706BO 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 2,814,453.13 0.00 102.343750 FC 12-NOV-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 22 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST .. CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 -2,814,453.13 -2,814,453.13 102.343750 02R0706B0 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.343750 SC ----------- 2,578.12 2,578.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 -2,814,453.13 -2,814,453.13 102.343750 02R0706B0 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -2,814,453.13 0.00 102.343750 FCC 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 03-NOV-1998 1,997,560.00 1,997,560.00 99.878000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 06-NOV-1998 -1,997,730.00 -1,997,730.00 99.878000 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -170.00 -170.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 03-NOV-1998 12,400.00 22,400.00 99.878000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 99.878000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 03-NOV-1998 2,009,960.00 2,009,960.00 99.878000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 06-NOV-1998 2,009,960.00 0.00 99.878000 FC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 06-NOV-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -757,499.42 FHLMC GROUP ®GO-0496 16-OCT-1998 775,253.31 775,253.31 102.343750 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 -775,963.47 -775,963.47 102.343750 S GREENWICH CAP MKTS, NEW YORK ----------- -710.16 -710.16 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -757,499.42 FHLMC GROUP BGO-0496 16-OCT-1998 1,620.21 1,620.21 102.343750 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 102.343750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -757,499.42 FHLMC GROUP ®GO-0496 16-OCT-1998 776,873.52 776,873.52 102.343750 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 776,873.52 0.00 102.343750 Page 23 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC CHASE SECS INC, NY 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP IGO-0496 16-OCT-1998 1,033,671.88 1,033,671.88 102.343750 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 -1,034,618.75 -1,034,618.75 102.343750 S GREENWICH CAP MKTS, NEW YORK ----------- -946.87 -946.87 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4GO-0496 16-OCT-1998 2,160.28 2,150.28 102.343750 31283GRR0 7.0001 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 102.343750 is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP AGO-0496 16-OCT-1998 1,035,832.16 1,035,832.16 102.343750 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 1,035,832.16 0.00 102.343750 PC CHASE SECS INC, NY 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /GO-0496 16-OCT-1998 1,033,671.88 1,033,671.88 102.343750 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 -1,034,618.75 -1,034,618.75 102.343750 S GREENWICH CAP MKTS, NEW YORK ----------- -946.87 -946.87 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP AGO-0496 16-OCT-1998 2,160.28 2,160.28 102.343750 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 102.343750 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,010,000.00 FHLMC GROUP BGO-0496 16-OCT-1998 1,035,832.16 1,035,832.16 102.343750 31283GRR0 7.000% 07/01/2026 DO 07/01/96 12-NOV-1998 1,035,832.16 0.00 102.343750 PC CHASE SECS INC, NY 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -452,217.57 PNMA POOL #0065581 17-NOV-1998 455,043.96 455,043.96 100.625006 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 19-NOV-1998 -455,467.88 -455,467.88 100.625006 S BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY ----------- -423.92 -423.92 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -452,217.57 FNMA POOL #0065581 17-NOV-1998 1,390.34 1,390.34 100.625006 Page 24 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST .. CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31362M2N7 6.391% O6/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 100.625006 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -462,217.57 FNMA POOL /0065581 17-NOV-1990 456,434.30 456,434.30 100.625006 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 19-NOV-1996 456,434.30 O.OD 100.625006 FC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 20-NOV-1998 0.00 O.OD 1.000000000 O.DD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -888,392.65 FNMA POOL #0313371 17-NOV-1998 893,945.14 893,945.14 100.625004 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 19-NOV-1998 -894,777.97 -894,777.97 100.625004 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -832.83 -832.83 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -668,392.65 FNMA POOL 10313371 17-NOV-1998 2,729.14 2,729.14 100.625004 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 100.625004 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -888,392.65 FNMA POOL #0313371 17-NOV-1998 896,674.28 896,674.28 100.625004 31374GCG0 6.147% O8/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 19-NOV-1998 896,674.28 0.00 100.625004 FC BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY 20-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -058,537.58 FNMA P00L 10313600 17-NOV-1998 863,903.44 863,903.44 100.625000 31374GKM8 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 19-NOV-1996 -864,708.31 -864,708.31 100.625000 S BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY ----------- -804.87 -804.87 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -858,537.58 FNMA POOL #0313600 17-NOV-1998 2,642.15 2,642.15 100.625000 31374GKMS 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 100.625000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -858,537.58 FNMA POOL #0313600 17-NOV-1998 866,545.59 866,545.59 100.625000 31374GKMB 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 19-NOV-1998 866,545.59 0.00 100.625000 FC BEAR STEARNS 4 CO INC, NY 20-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 25 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 -6,475,000.00 -6,475,000.00 129.500000 912830DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 6,233,593.15 6,233,593.75 129.500000 SC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- -241,406.25 -241,406.25 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 -114,877.72 -114,871.72 129.500000 912830DE5 11.125E 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 129.500000 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 -6,589,877.72 -6,589,877.72 129.500000 912810DES 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 -6,599,877.72 0.00 129.500000 FCC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-OCT-1998 13,418,531.25 13,418,531.25 109.093750 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 23-OCT-1998 -13,226,948.16 -13,226,948.16 109.093750 S BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 191,583.09 191,583.09 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-OCT-1990 403,593.75 403,593.75 109.093750 912827D25 01.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 23-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 109.093750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-OCT-1998 13,822,125.00 13,822,125.00 109.093750 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 23-OCT-1998 13,922,125.00 0.00 109.093750 PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-NOV-1998 11,164,234.38 11,164,234.38 108.390625 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 04-NOV-1998 -11,076,224.88 -11,076,224.BB 108.390625 S CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 88,009.50 88,009.50 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-NOV-1998 363,158.97 363,158.97 108.390625 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 04-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 108.390625 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 26 „ OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-MOV-1998 TH10D BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-NOV-1998 11,527,393.35 11,527,393.35 108.390625 912827D25 07.500E 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 04-NOV-1998 11,527,393.35 0.00 108.390625 FC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 05-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-NOV-1998 1,043,125.00 1,043,125.00 104.312500 912827Z54 06.375E 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 19-NOV-1998 -1,023,750.00 -1,023,750.00 104.312500 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 19,375.00 19,375.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-NOV-1998 8,756.87 8,756.87 104.312500 912827Z54 06.375E 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 104.312500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-NOV-1998 1,051,881.87 1,051,881.87 104.312500 912827ZS4 06.375E 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 19-NOV-1998 1,051,081.87 0.00 104.312500 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 19-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-NOV-1998 9,473,632.81 9,473,632.81 106.445312 9128272WI 06.500E 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 04-NOV-1998 -9,165,931.46 -9,165,931.46 106.445312 S CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 307,701.35 307,701.35 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-NOV-1998 248,154.37 248,154.37 106.445312 9128272WI 06.500E 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 04-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 106.445312 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-NOV-1998 9,721,787.18 9,721,787.18 106.445312 9128272NI 06.500E 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 04-NOV-1998 9,721,787.18 0.00 106.445312 FC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 05-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA 18-NOV-1998 2,013,750.00 2,013,750.00 100.687500 999ACK453 6.160E 11/25/2028 23-NOV-1998 -2,017,343.76 -2,017,343.76 100.687500 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- -3,593.76 -3,593.76 1.000000000 0.00 Page 27 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 18-NOV-1998 2,013,750.00 2,013,750.00 100.687500 999ACN453 6.160% 11/25/202B 23-NOV-1998 2,013,750.00 0.00 100.687500 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 23-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -163,368.42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-NOV-1998 163,368.42 163,368.42 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-NOV-1998 -163,030.20 -163,030.20 100.000000 PD ----------- 338.22 338.22 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -163,368.42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-NOV-1998 163,368.42 163,368.42 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-NOV-1998 163,368.42 0.00 100.000000 PC 16-NOV-199B 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -565,772.96 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-NOV-199B 565,772.96 565,772.96 100.000000 312ODD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 01-NOV-199B -574,613.16 -574,613.16 100.000000 PD ----------- -8,840.20 -8,840.20 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -565,772.96 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-NOV-1998 565,772.96 565,772.96 100.000000 3128DD055 7.0008 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-NOV-1998 565,772.96 0.00 100.000000 FC 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 95,834.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-OCT-1998 -95,834.00 -95,834.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-OCT-1998 95,938.82 95,938.82 100.000000 PDC ----------- 104.82 104.82 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -95,834.34 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-OCT-1998 95,834.34 95,834.34 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-OCT-1998 -95,939.16 -95,939.16 100.000000 PD -- -104.82 -104.82 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -95,834.34 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-OCT-1998 95,834.34 95,834.34 100.000000 Page 28 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM10D BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-OCT-1998 95,834.34 0.00 100.000000 FC 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -00,651.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-NOV-1998 80,651.50 80,651.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-NOV-1998 -80,739.71 -80,739.71 100.000000 PD ----------- -88.21 -88.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46,964.1D FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-NOV-1998 46,964.10 46,964.10 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-NOV-1998 -46,898.06 -46,898.06 100.000000 PD ----------- 66.04 66.04 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -46,964.10 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-NOV-1998 46,964.10 46,964.10 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-NOV-1998 46,964.10 0.00 100.000000 FC 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,627.77 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-NOV-1998 6,627.77 6,627.77 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-NOV-1998 -6,675.41 -6,675.41 100.000000 PD ----------- -47.64 -47.64 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,627.77 FNMA POOL 00065581 01-NOV-1998 6,627.77 6,627.77 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-NOV-1998 6,627.77 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,315.63 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-NOV-1998 15,315.63 15,315.63 100.000000 31374GCG0 6.1474 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 01-NOV-1998 -15,425.71 -15,425.71 100.000000 PD ----------- -110.08 -110.08 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,315.63 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-NOV-1998 -15,315.63 -15,315.63 100.000000 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 01-NOV-1998 15,425.71 15,425.71 100.000000 PDC ----------- 110.06 110.08 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 29 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -15,315.62 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-NOV-1998 15,315.62 15,315.62 100.000000 31374GCGO 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-NOV-1998 -15,425.70 -15,425.70 100.000000 PD ----------- -110.08 -110.08 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,315.62 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-NOV-1998 15,315.62 15,315.62 100.000000 31374GCGO 6.147% 08/01/2029 DD 01/01/97 01-NOV-1998 15,315.62 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,724.36 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-NOV-1998 16,724.36 16,724.36 100.000000 31374GKMB 6.143% 05/01/2036 DD 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 -16,844.57 -16,844.57 100.000000 PD ----------- -120.21 -120.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,724.36 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-NOV-1998 -16,724.36 -26,724.36 100.000000 31374GKM8 6.143% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 16,844.57 16,844.57 100.000000 PDC ----------- 120.21 120.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,724.36 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-NOV-1998 16,724.36 16,724.36 100.000000 31374GKMB 6.1431 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 -16,844.57 -16,844.57 100.000000 PD ----------- -120.21 -120.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,724.36 PUMA POOL 103136DO 01-NOV-1998 -16,724.36 -16,724.36 100.000000 31374GKM8 6.143% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 16,844.57 16,844.57 100.000000 PDC ----------- 120.21 120.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,717.17 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-NOV-1998 16,717.17 16,717.17 100.000000 31374GKM8 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 -16,837.32 -16,837.32 100.000000 PD ----------- -120.15 -120.15 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,717.17 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-NOV-1998 16,717.17 16,717.17 100.000000 31374GKM8 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 16,717.17 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 30 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USE, O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -737.46 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-NOV-1998 137.46 737.46 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-NOV-1998 -742.76 -742.76 100.000000 PD ----------- -5.30 -5.30 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 737.46 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-NOV-1998 -737.46 -737.46 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-NOV-1998 742.76 742.76 100.000000 PDC ----------- 5.30 5.30 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -737.49 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-NOV-1998 737.49 737.49 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-NOV-1998 -742.79 -742.79 100.000000 PD ----------- -5.30 -5.30 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -737.49 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-NOV-1998 737.49 737.49 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-NOV-1998 737.49 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,365.78 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-NOV-1998 22,365.78 22,365.78 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-NOV-1998 -22,365.78 -22,365.78 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,365.78 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-NOV-1998 22,365.78 22,365.78 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-NOV-1998 22,365.78 0.00 100.000000 PC 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -163,167.90 GNMA II POOL 00080023 01-NOV-1998 163,167.90 163,167.90 100.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-NOV-1998 -165,870.37 -165,870.37 100.000000 PO ----------- -2,702.47 -2,702.47 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 163,167.90 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-NOV-1998 -163,167.90 -163,167.90 100.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-NOV-1998 165,870.37 165,870.37 100.000000 PDC ----------- 2,702.47 2,702.47 1.000000000 0.00 Page 31 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1999 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -163,164.70 GNMA II POOL /0080023 01-NOV-1998 163,164.70 163,164.70 100.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-NOV-1998 -165,867.12 -165,867.12 100.000000 PD ----------- -2,702.42 -2,702.42 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -163,164.70 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-NOV-1998 163,164.70 163,164.70 100.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-NOV-1998 163,164.70 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -334,782.86 GNMA II POOL 0080088M 01-SEP-1998 334,782.86 334,782.86 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -342,106.24 -342,106.24 100.000000 PD ----------- -7,323.38 -7,323.38 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -334,782.86 GNMA II POOL 1080088M O1-SEP-1998 334,782.86 334,782.86 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-SEP-1998 334,782.86 0.00 100.000000 PC 23-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -199,493.67 GNMA II POOL 9080088M O1-NOV-1998 199,493.67 199,493.67 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 -203,857.59 -203,857.59 100.000000 PD ----------- -4,363.92 -4,363.92 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 199,493.67 GNMA II P00L 4080088M O1-NOV-1998 -199,493.67 -199,493.67 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 203,857.59 203,857.59 100.000000 PDC ----------- 4,363.92 4,363.92 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -199,494.03 GNMA II POOL 1080088M O1-NOV-199B 199,494.03 199,494.03 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-NOV-199B -203,857,96 -203,957.96 100.000000 PD ----------- -4,363.93 -4,363.93 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -199,494.03 GNMA II POOL 4080088M O1-NOV-1998 199,494.03 199,494.03 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 199,494.03 0.00 100.000000 FC 20-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 32 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST .. CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 25-NOV-1998 198,961.94 198,961.94 100.000000 26354BLRI 11/25/1998 25-NOV-1998 -198,961.94 -198,961.94 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 06-NOV-1998 792,920.00 792,920.00 100.DD0000 313397N49 MAT 11/06/1998 06-NOV-1998 -792,920.00 -792,920.00 100.OD0000 MT BOND MATURITY 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 23-NOV-1998 3,687,666.67 3,687,666.67 100.00000D 313397053 MAT 11/23/1998 23-NOV-1998 -3,687,666.67 -3,687,666.67 100.0000D0 MT BOND MATURITY 23-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 06-NOV-1998 3,156,158.22 3,156,159.22 100.000000 313589N41 MAT 11/06/1998 06-NOV-1998 -3,156,158.22 -3,156,158.22 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY O6-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 GMAC DISC 18-NOV-1999 882,675.00 882,675.00 100.000000 37042ELJB 11/18/1998 18-NOV-1998 -882,675.00 -082,675.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 18-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 FORD MTR CA MTN TRANCHE 4TR 96 09-NOV-1998 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 100.000000 345402DZI FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 09-NOV-1998 -3,970,480.00 -3,970,480.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 09-NOV-1998 29,520.00 29,520.00 1.000000000 0.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 28-OCT-1998 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 31364BWF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 28-OCT-1998 =9,593,750.00 -9,593,750.00 100.000000 CAL ----------- 406,250.00 406,250.00 1.000000000 Page 33 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 28-OCT-1998 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 31364BWF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 28-OCT-1998 10,000,000.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -0.01 TO DELIVER OFF FRACTIONAL UNIT 30-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 0.000000 31374GCGO FNMA POOL #0313371 30-NOV-1998 -0.01 -0.01 0.000000 SW 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 ----------- -0.01 -0.01 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 12-NOV-1998 29,902.08 29,902.08 0.000000 066365DW4 FLTG AT 05/11/2003 DD 05/11/98 11-NOV-1998 29,902.08 0.00 0.000000 IT 12-NOV-199B 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 02-NOV-1998 44,043.75 44,043.75 0.000000 073902ANS 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 01-NOV-1998 44,043.75 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 163,368.42 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 16-NOV-1998 10,087.70 10,087.70 0.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-NOV-1998 10,087.70 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-MOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 18-NOV-1998 14,599.63 14,599.63 0.000000 171200EBO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 15-NOV-1998 14,599.63 0.00 0.000000 IT 18-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 25-NOV-1998 1,038.06 1,038.06 0.000000 26354BLR1 11/25/1998 25-NOV-1998 1,038.06 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 34 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 565,772.96 FHLMC GROUP RG5-0476 16-NOV-1998 92,396.27 92,396.27 0.000000 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-NOV-1998 92,396.27 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 95,834.34 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 16-NOV-1998 22,733.19 22,733.19 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-OCT-1998 22,733.19 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 25-NOV-1998 10,833.33 10,833.33 0.000000 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 25-NOV-1998 10,833.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 46,964.10 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 16-NOV-1998 5,972.63 5,972.63 0.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-NOV-1998 5,972.63 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 06-NOV-1998 7,080.00 7,080.00 0.000000 313397N49 MAT 11/06/199B O6-NOV-1998 7,080.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 06-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 23-NOV-1998 12,333.33 12,333.33 0.000000 313397053 MAT 11/23/1998 23-NOV-1998 12,333.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 23-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC O6-NOV-1998 43,841.78 43,641.78 0.000000 313589N41 MAT 11/06/199B 06-NOV-1998 43,841.78 0.00 0.000000 IT O6-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,627.77 FNMA POOL #0065581 25-NOV-1998 2,355.79 2,355.79 0.000000 31362142N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-NOV-1998 2,355.79 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 35 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ RASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 28-OCT-1998 -106,533.33 -106,533.33 0.000000 31364BHF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 20-AUG-1998 -106,533.33 0.00 0.000000 ITC 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 28-OCT-1998 106,533.33 106,533.33 0.000000 31364BNF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DD 02/20/96 28-OCT-1998 106,533.33 0.00 0.000000 CD REPS INTEREST RECEIVED AS A 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 RESULT OF CALL 10/28/98 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,315.62 FNMA POOL #0313371 25-NOV-1998 4,636.18 4,636.78 0.000000 31374GCGO 6.147% 08/01/2029 DD 01/01/97 01-NOV-1998 4,636.78 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,717.17 FNMA POOL 10313600 25-NOV-1998 4,500.20 4,500.20 0.000000 31374GKM8 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 4,500.20 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 737.49 FNMA POOL #0339016 25-NOV-199B 150.07 150.87 0.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-NOV-1998 150.87 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,365.78 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 16-NOV-1998 1,501.27 1,501.27 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-NOV-1998 1,501.27 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO TERM ENHANCED 30-NOV-1998 29,500.55 29,500.55 0.000000 345397SCB FLTG AT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 27-NOV-1998 29,580.55 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 FORD MTR CA MTN TRANCHE 1TR 96 09-NOV-1998 54,649.86 54,649.86 0.000000 345402DE1 FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DD 11/08/93 08-NOV-1998 54,649.86 0.00 0.000000 Page 36 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST .. CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ IT 09-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 163,164.70 GNMA II POOL 10080023 20-NOV-1998 15,211.58 15,211.58 0.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-NOV-1998 15,211.58 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 199,494.03 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 20-NOV-1998 21,548.19 21,548.19 0.000000 36225CC20 6.8758 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-NOV-1998 21,548.19 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 334,792.86 GNMA II P00L 4080088M 23-NOV-1998 25,134.33 25,134.33 0.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-SEP-1998 25,134.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 23-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GMAC DISC 18-NOV-1998 17,325.00 17,325.00 0.000000 37042ELJ8 11/19/199B 18-NOV-1998 17,325.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 18-NOV-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 02-NOV-1998 44,531.25 44,531.25 0.000000 3704250F0 7.125% 05/01/2001 DO 05/01/97 01-NOV-1998 44,531.25 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 18-NOV-1998 59,069.88 59,069.88 0.000000 370425QV5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 DO O8/17/98 18-NOV-1998 59,069.88 0.00 0.000000 IT 18-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 100570 02-NOV-1998 9,413.37 9,413.37 0.000000 44181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 DD 09/04/98 02-NOV-1998 9,413.37 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-NOV-1998 308,750.00 308,750.00 0.000000 Page 37 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 91281ODGO 11.875% 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/83 15-NOV-1998 308,750.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.OD0000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-NOV-1998 165,625.00 165,625.00 0.000000 912810DJ4 13.250% 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 15-NOV-1998 165,625.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-NOV-1998 641,250.00 641,250.00 0.000000 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 15-NOV-1998 641,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-NOV-1998 105,187.50 105,187.50 0.000000 912827X72 06.375% 05/15/1999 DO 05/15/96 15-NOV-1998 105, 187.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 02-NOV-1998 12,600.00 12,600.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1990 12,600.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 02-NOV-1998 -12,600.00 -12,600.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 02-NOV-1998 12,600.00 12,600.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 02-NOV-1998 12,600.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 OCTOBER 1998 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-NOV-1998 12,600.00 12,600.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1998 12,600.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 38 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LASS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-NOV-1998 115,937.50 115,937.50 0.000000 9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DD 04/30/97 31-OCT-1998 115,937.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-MOV-1998 523,250.00 523,250.00 0.000000 9128272WI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 30-NOV-1998 523,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-NOV-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,163.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-OCT-1998 -0,163.00 -8,163.00 0.000000 9128273AO 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -0,163.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-OCT-1998 8,163.00 8,163.00 0.000000 9128273AO 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 30-OCT-1998 8,163.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 OCTOBER 1998 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FOS INT ADJ 30-NOV-1998 -2,542.42 -2,542.42 0.000000 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 30-NOV-1998 -2,542.42 0.00" 0.000000 CW AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 30-NOV-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-NOV-1998 5,266.41 5,266.41 0.000000 996085247 01-NOV-1998 5,266.41 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-MOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-NOV-1990 21,240.45 21,240.45 0.000000 996085247 01-NOV-1998 21,240.45 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 02-NOV-1998 9.40 9.40 0.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 01-NOV-1998 9.40 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 39 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1998 - 30-NOV-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ Page 40 or Dr.FAHR COMMITTEE dI6911/W/D 17 AGENDA REPORT Item (a) ItemN mpg 13um Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: RENEWAL OF THE DISTRICTS EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 1999 TO JULY 1, 2002 (FAHR98-83) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Renew the District's Excess General Liability Insurance Program for the three-year period July 1, 1999 to July 1, 2002, in an amount not to exceed $111,492 each fiscal year. SUMMARY Staff recommends the renewal of the District's $25 million Excess General Liability Insurance Program for the three-year period July 1, 1999 through July 1, 2002. The coverage is provided through the California Municipal Excess Liability Program (CAMEL). At present, the District is in the third year of a three-year commitment to the CAMEL Program approved by the Board in May 1996. after completing a competitive bid selection process. The premium cost for FY 1998-99 was $111,492. Approval of this agenda item would continue the District's $25 million liability coverage through the CAMEL program for three additional years, with no increase in the annual premium cost. Further, the District would be eligible for a dividend rebate in the amount of 15% to 20% of premium cost beginning with the FY 1999-2000 renewal period. Excess General Liability Program The current liability insurance program provides the District with a $25 million policy of comprehensive coverage for property and vehicle damage, bodily injury, and personal injury. The program was structured to also include Employment Practices, and Public Officials Errors & Omissions coverages. The $25 million coverage is per occurrence, with a self-insured deductible of$100,000 per occurrence. In 1997, the Employment Practices portion of coverage was enhanced from a $2 million sublimit, to the full $25 million policy limit. %4 donWaVI"ry VnUl Ptra-VAHRTAHF60r AHRB6eJ.dx R--: WOW Page 1 Renewal for FY 1999-2000 through FY 2001-02 Two important advantages of a multi-year renewal of the District's participation in the CAMEL general liability insurance program include guaranteed coverage and cost stability. When the District entered the CAMEL program for three years beginning in July 1996, we obtained an annual premium cost not to exceed $125,000 in the first year, together with a commitment for a 2% premium reduction in the second year of the program, and a 5% premium reduction in the third year. It should be noted that the actual second-year premium cost (FY 1997-98) was $121,875, a 2.5% reduction from the first-year premium; and the that this year's premium represents a second consecutive year of cost savings, as the FY 1997-98 premium cost was $111,492, an 8.52% reduction from the second-year premium. Building on these premium cost reductions of more than 10%, approval of the proposed renewal of the District's Excess General Liability insurance policy would guarantee both continuation of the District's $25 million level of coverage, and a level annual premium not to exceed the FY 1998-99 cost of$111,492, for each of the next three fiscal years. Dividend Rebates Additionally, the District becomes eligible for an annual CAMEL program dividend rebate in the amount of 15% to 20% of premium cost beginning with the FY 1999-2000 renewal period. Each year, the dividend rebate will be calculated based on the loss experience of the program for the program year that expired two years prior to the calculation. Dividends are then paid to program participants in equal annual increments for the two years following the calculation. By example, calculation of an annual dividend rebate in July 1999, at the minimum rate of 15%, would further reduce the District's premium cost by at least another$16,724. The District would receive the first half of the dividend rebate in FY 1999-2000, and the second half in FY 2000-01. Thus, annual premium costs would be lowered to approximately$103,130, in the first and second years of the renewal period. Likewise, the annual dividend calculation in July 2000, would result in a similar premium cost reduction in FY 2001-02, the third year of the renewal period. Conclusion In summary, renewal of the CAMEL excess liability insurance program will ensure that the District's premium costs are controlled while obtaining maximum coverage levels for the Districts for the next three fiscal years. The attached letter from Robert F. Driver Associates, the District's Broker of Record, summarizes coverage and cost information for the proposed excess general liability insurance renewal. Staff will continue to work with our insurance broker to develop and implement additional program enhancements. \Ytiv,WTi1M =%in1210cra�AHWAXRBSPMFAXftB88l h,c RmW erxiae Paget PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter from Robert F. Driver Associates ftde Webl4 ftft131P Aero AHM AHfl881�}FAHR9 dw R. � Page 3 V ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES a Dividoa of Robert F.Ddver Co.,1ac A SWOCIATFS Founded on knowledge, integrity and service. November 24, 1998 Steve Kozak,Financial Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 RE: Excess Liability Insurance Coverage California Municipal Excess Liability (CAMEL) Program Dear Steve: At July 1, 1998, we renewed coverage for the Districts in the CAMEL Program. The Districts have been insured in the program since July 1996 after a Request for Proposal process. The program provides General Liability, Auto Liability and Public Officials Errors & Omissions coverage for the Districts. The limit of coverage is $25,000,000 excess of a self-insured retention of $100,000 per occurrence. A full outline of the program is attached. In 1992, our office created the CAMEL Program to provide California public agencies with a joint purchase alternative to the standard "open market' placements. CAMEL provides its members with greater stability of pricing, broader coverage and potential dividends for years where there is a good loss experience. At the July 1" renewal, we were able to obtain several long-term commitments from our program underwriters. First, the premium for the Districts of$111,492 is guaranteed to stay at this level for three years. During this period, the coverage supplied will remain "as is" or be improved where possible. Lastly, we have continued to improve the dividend program, which the Districts become eligible for starting July 1, 1999. This program can now pay up to 20% of the premium back to the members when the loss experience is profitable. When we successfully placed the business over two years ago, the Districts obtained a very competitive program. Since then, the CAMEL Program has further decreased the premium paid by the Districts. We now have the opportunity to "lock in" these very competitive rates and coverages. It is our recommendation that Orange County Sanitation District take advantage of this offer. Newport Beach 4041 MacArthur Blvd.,#300, P.O. Box 6450, Newport Beach, Califonua 92658-6450 r (949) 756-0271 •Fax(949)756-2713 x.uaww>a¢uo�+s�swasoa: Licd'OC36861 r wwx.rfdriveccom San Diego Escondido Sacramento Fresno u Steve Kozak,Financial Manager Orange County Sanitation District November 24, 1998 Page Two In addition, we continue to improve the coverages under the Program. As this last renewal, we were able to include coverage for Inverse Condemnation and Subsidence. We are always looking for ways to ensure that CAMEL stays on the "cutting edge" of not only pricing but also coverage. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, ROBERT F.DRIVER Al/SSSOOCIIAT/nES— Gordon B. DesCombes Executive Vice President GBD/stb Enc. x.ummnv,wcuawe.vomcsn.e: Yi ® CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL EXCESS LIABILITY (CAMEL) PROGRAM SUMMARY JULY 1, 1998-1999 INSURERS: American Re-Insurance Company(Am-Re)and Sable Insurance Company (American Re-Insurance is the lead underwriter and re-insures a majority of the Program. The Sable Insurance Company issues the policies and provides excess capacity) BEST'S GUIDE American Re-Insurance Company RATING: A, Excellent; Financial Size Category FSC 12$500,000,000 to$750,000,000 Sable Insurance Company A, Excellent; Financial Size Category FSC 12$1,000,000,000 to$1,250,000,000 CALIFORNIA STATUS: Admitted PROGRAM TERM: July 1, 1998 to July 1,2001 COVERAGE: Excess Municipal Liability on an Occurrence Basis including: • Bodily Injury • Personal Injury • Property Damage • Public Officials Errors&Omissions • Unfair Employment Practices Liability • Excess Employer's Liability • Subsidence • Inverse Condemnation MAJOR EXCLUSIONS: • Workers' Compensation • Asbestos • Pollution/Contamination except for: Hostile Fire and Collision Upset/Overturn of owned and non-owned vehicles and Time Element Extension • Eminent Domain • Care, Custody and Control ASSOCIATE r�V� >s v CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL EXCESS LIABILITY (CAMEL) PROGRAM SUMMARY JULY 1, 1998-1999 MAJOR EXCLUSIONS (continued): • Aircraft/Airfield Exclusion(F)not absolute • Watercraft • Airports • Medical Malpractice(except incidental) • Subsidence • Nuclear Material • ERISA • Dams(only those owned or operated by the insured) LIMITS OF LIABILITY: I. BASIC PROGRAM Difference Between$10,000,000 per occurrence and Self-Insured Retention II. S10 X$15 OPTIONAL PROGRAM Optional $5,000,000, $10,000,000 or $15,000,000 per occurrence excess of $10,000,000 Basic Program. Annual Aggregate applies to each entity for Products/Completed Operations and Public Officials Errors&Omissions. DEFENSE COSTS AND EXPENSES: Defense Costs and Expenses are included in the Self-Insured Retention and Limits of Liability CLAIMS To remain under direction and control of ADMINISTRATION: Individual CAMEL members. Claims Reporting Requirements apply as outlined in the issued policies OTHER PROGRAM • "Rolling"Three Year Premium Program per FEATURES: attached • CAMEL Dividend Program per attached ����'' ASSOCIATES r�®rimn.aaiaaars r 1998 CAMEL PROGRAM DIVIDEND PARAMETERS 1. The Dividend is calculated 90 days prior to renewal for the policy that incepted 3 years prior (i.e. Dividend for the 7/1/98 year is based on the 7/l/95-96 policy premium). 2. The Dividend Percentage is 15%. There is an additional Bonus Dividend of 5%. 3. The Dividend is applicable to the "Basic" Program premium (Limits to $10,000,000) for the policy that incepted 3 years prior. 4. 75% of the entities that participated in the prior policy year must renew in order for the Dividend to apply. 5. Dividends are only paid if a member renews with the Program. 6. The Loss Ratio must be below 50% for the Dividend to apply. The Loss Ratio must be below 25% for the additional Bonus Dividend to apply. The Loss Ratio is calculated using the Policy Premiums divided by Incurred Losses. 7. Incurred Losses are those losses paid or reserved above member self- insured retentions, as determined by American Re-Insurance. ASSOCIATES CeMana Limnce%WBC3]9 1 1998 CAMEL PROGRAM DIVIDEND PAYMENT PLAN • All Dividends are paid in two (2) increments. • 50% is paid 3 years after inception and 50% is paid 4 years after inception. • At the 2nd calculation, the members are able to recapture any dividend not paid in the prior calculation due to a change in loss reserves. The underwriters, however, are not able to recapture past dividend payments if loss reserves or payments increase at the 2' calculation. ASSOCIATE Colnmia Liw�m ao Wn FAHR COMMITTEE MemngDxe I To6d.ofDin. 12/09/98 12/06/98 AGENDA REPORT R eM NMW IMM N mw, 13 Cub) I AR ( eJ Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (FAHR98-84) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the 1998-99 Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter ended September 30, 1998. SUMMARY Attached in a separately bound document is the District's First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period ended September 30, 1998. This report is a consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the District through the first quarter of the 1998-99 fiscal year. Contained within the First Quarter Financial Report and Operational Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating &Working Capital Funds, the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, individual Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds. Also contained within this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan milestones identified in the 1998-99 Approved Budget and Strategic Goals Workplan. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 23.12 percent, or$10,449,000 of the 1998-99 net joint operating budget of$45.2 million has been expended. Net costs have increased 9.25 percent in comparison with the same period last year primarily due to the timing of expenditures. Last year, expenditures were low in the beginning of the year, only at 20.38 percent, due to the year-end costs incurred late in the 1996-97 year. This year, although still under the first quarter budget, costs are now being incurred and reported in a more even distribution. The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 1998 is $449.67 based on flows of 23,236.07 million gallons. This is $35.96, or 7.4 percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of$485.63. N1wp ran erfAMWAHRMOnn FAHRB 4dz Reefed. d 8 Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. 1998-99 Financial and Operational Report for the Quarter Ended September 30, 1998 e�ro wn„va<o.e��emsuasa�vnxasam e: a...Y.a erzam Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE Mer21 9e- gsae To04.ofD Mzis/9er. AGENDA REPORT Item Wm Ee Rmn Num r3 rct ,;a lF� Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT(CAFR) FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 (FAHR 98-85) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive, file and approve the Districts' Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 1998, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. SUMMARY The District's independent auditors, Moreland & Associates, have completed their examination of the Districts' financial statements for the year ended June 30, 1998, the last year to be audited prior to consolidation, and have again issued an unqualified opinion on the Districts' financial statements. Each year, the FAHR Committee reviews the results of the audit and the corresponding Auditors report to the Committee. Michael Moreland, Partner, will attend the meeting to respond to any questions of Directors. This year, staff has again prepared the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that incorporates the audited financial statements in-house. For the last four years, the Districts have earned the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). This years report will again be submitted to GFOA for their review in anticipation of another award. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, including the Auditors opinion letter, the Auditor's Report to the Committee, the Auditors Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, and the Auditors Appropriations Limit Report are attached. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A \YaEpntlltytbp.WNn2l CcnnpFPHRFPXR981D[c\FRHR9995 Goc R�„� eaoee Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1998 2. Auditor's Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 3. Auditor's Report to the FAHR Committee 4. Appropriations Limit Report %WdonWablFv fttnplUenneI AHRWAHRB91 AHRBbH d. R-..e. v Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE ""sRB D" 1T°a 12/09/98 2/16 en m g fllb- AGENDA REPORT 12(d)Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (FAHR98-81) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1 through September 30, 1998. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the"Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies," are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) 1VdMW@WlM %n1]101c AHWAHRBB�AHRY lGx R,„,a.. 1� Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Performance Reports The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for your reference. Also attached are two comparative bar charts which depict the sector diversification of the District's portfolios, as of June 30, 1998, and September 30, 1998. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of less than 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries, and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a summary of the performance of the Districts portfolios managed by PIMCO for the period July 1 through September 30, 1998. Portfol ,Performance Sunnary Quarter Ended September 30,1998 Liquid Operating Monies(%) Long-Term Operating Monies(%) Total Rate of Return 3 Months 15 39 6 Months 2.9 5.7 9 Monrhs 4.3 1.4 12 Months 5.7 9.5 Since inception 30 Sept.95 5.7 7. 6en—c ark 3 Months 1.3 3.7 6 Months 9 Months .9 7.1 12 Months .2 9.1 Since Inception 30 Sept,95 5.3 7.3 Market Value per PIMCO 30 Sept.98 S18.4M $282.8M Average Quality 'AAA. 'AM' Current Yield 5.5% 6.1% Estimated Yield to Maturity 4.9% 4.8% auarteL Oelpi,5 Is(W andrawals) (540M) Esl'unaletl Annual Income S1.gM 517.3M Market Recap The third quarter of 1998 saw investors rush to the relative safety and quality of U.S. government bonds. This pushed interest rates to 30-year lows as economic and political turmoil, which began more than a year ago in Asia, permeated international capital markets, including the U.S. This prompted the Federal Reserve to cut short-term interest rates by 25 basis points, amid concerns of slower growth in the U.S. economy. 1NGwWlOI My Cpgnt$tOt,lne�AMMF/JlaeTpY}FAMRe$a1 eM n«..a uses Page 2 ' As depicted in the attached comparative graph of the "Historical Yield Curve," the Treasury yield curve flattened significantly during the third quarter, with rates dropping sharply. The benchmark 30-year Treasury rate declined approximately 65 basis points when compared to the end of the second quarter 1998 (4.97% vs. 5.62%). Shorter rates (3-month to 1-year) declined an average of 80 basis points. However, intermediate rates (from 2 to 10 years) declined more significantly; 119 basis points on average. As a result, relative returns were lower across the yield curve. For the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a weighted maturity or duration, slightly above the duration index (2.5 vs. 2.3 years), emphasizing holdings in lower coupon mortgage backed securities, and higher- quality corporates. These investments contributed incremental yield to the portfolio when compared to the all-Treasury benchmark yields, despite market volatility. The portfolio outperformed its benchmark (3.9% vs. 3.7%) for the third quarter. For the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained an at-index duration posture (approximately 72 days), and continued emphasizing U.S. Agency discount notes and high-quality corporate commercial paper in the portfolio. These investments added incremental yield to the portfolio, which outperformed its benchmark (1.5% vs.1.3%)for the third quarter. Portfolio Market Values Two withdrawals were made from the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio during the quarter. On July 29, 1998. $20 million was withdrawn to fund the semi-annual debt service payments for the Districts COP issues. On September 22, 1998, another$20 million was withdrawn to meet current and projected cash flow requirements. These funds are invested in LAW until they are needed. Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table below, and in the attached bar chart. Long-Term Liquid Operating Quarter Operating Monies Ending Monies(SM) (SM) 30 Sept 97 17.4 298.5 31 Dec.97 17.6 301.1 31 March 98 17.8 306.0 30 June 98 18.1 311.5 30 Se .98 18.4 282.8 1VetlmWeOlYq.gpA"Vleoe,M MRTAHa8910"dFAHRRBal. m RM , 1 s Page 3 ALTERNATIVES , N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. PIMCO Report 2. Callan Report 3. Three Comparative Bar Charts 4. Historical Yield Curve Graph SK:Ic 1VREonWhlMy Edt',+11PcnnelR'�XRFPXRBAOnSeANRB861 do RwtuJ. Page 4 Prepared by Finance, 11/18/98, 10:54 AM OCSD Investment Management Program Quarter End Portfolio Values (Marked-to-Market) $350,000,000 $300,000,000 ��� iii iii •+* $250,000,000 iii #iii - iii iii iii iii +++ iii iii iii ♦�� iii iii $200,000,000 ��� iii iii �** iii ��� .... --H++$150,000,000 iii *� • ++ +�� +*+ $100,000,000 iii iii --- -- iii ..._ iii +++ iii ♦.. ... $50,000,000 ��� iii - ��� iii iii . iii ♦.. ♦.. ��� iii - iii - iii $0 ��� +*+ ++; 30 Sep 97 31 Dec 97 31 Mar 98 30 Jun 98 30 Sep 98 ❑ Liquid Operating Monies ff] Long-Term Operating Monies G:\excel.dta\fi n\2220\geggi\Finance\investmgmtprogram Prepared by Finance, 11/18/98. 10:59 AM Y . OCSD Liquid ' Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Diversification 100100 100 . -- 90 - - -- - - 80 - - - ----- -- 70 c -- -. ._ - -- - - _ -_ 2 50 0 9/30/98 11 a`) 40 -- - a 30 -- -- - — 20 ----- - I 10 -r - --- . - ---- -- 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:lexcel.dte\fin122201geggi\FinancetPortfolio short term �1 Prepared by Finance, 11/18/98, 11:01 AM OCSD Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Diversification 100 90 -- - - -- --- - 80 72 - - - - - - - l u o/30/98 60 sa - -- -- -- -. ---j j 0 9/30/98 a) 50 - -- - - --. - aa) 40 - --- -- - --- a 30 - --- - - - — -- — - --- 25 - 20 -- — - ids ---- - - - - 10 - 5 3-- - - 9 U -O- --O 0 --- Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:\excel.otaTin\22201geggi\Finance\Portfolio long term graph Prepared by Finance, 11/12/98, 9:13 AM HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 6.00 . .. . I 5.75 5.50 li j : 5.25 I 5.00 0 w 4.75 ------ - ---- _... 4.50 ----- -- -- — ------ -- 4.25 4.00 a ro a m r. e o t 31-Mar-98 —e-30-Jun-98 —0--30-Sep-98 G:\excel.dta\fin12220\geggi\Fina nce W istoricalTREASURVyieldcurve BOARD OF DIRECTORS taemng Date TDBd.of Di, 12/16/98 AGENDA REPORT 1em Numbs item ryutnbe Orange County Sanitation X11rector 3 FROM: David Lu of Engineering Originator: Kathy Millea, Engineer SUBJECT: WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-65 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (2) Award a contract to KPRS Construction Services, Inc. for Job No. P2-65, to construct a warehouse at Plant No. 2 for a total not to exceed $1, 075,000. SUMMARY In June 1998, the Board of Directors approved plans and specifications for the Warehouse at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-65, and approved a budget increase of $385,000, bringing the total project budget to $1,564,000. This increase accounted for Coastal Permit conditions, unexpected poor soil conditions, and utility and material requirements that could not be determined during the preliminary design. On October 6, 1998, thirteen bids were received ranging from $1,063,838 to $1,885,000. The Architect's estimate was $1,110,000. The first low bidder, PDG Builders, was rejected as non-responsive by legal counsel as a result of the exclusion on the face of its bid. The responsible low bid is KPRS Construction Services, Inc. for $1,075,000. The Director of Engineering recommends award of the contract to KPRS Construction Services, Inc. Construction completion is scheduled for December 1999. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT N This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 9,Treatment Plant No.2, 7.b.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) GW&b.M9 da D10 Re,..nl Baartls\Wartbovu JW N.P3 5.D.98B 1 da Logy Rma 9Qm99 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In May 1997, the PDC Committee approved the construction of a new warehouse at Plant No. 2 in lieu of rehabilitating the existing warehouse. This decision was based on a preliminary cost estimate prepared by the architectural firm of Himes-Peters Architects, Inc. This architect estimated the construction cost to be $780,000. The project total for construction of the new warehouse was budgeted at $1,179,000. In September 1997, the Board of Directors approved the award of a PSA with Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. for the design of a warehouse at Plant No. 2. The interim construction cost estimate prepared by Lord Fleming Architects exceeded the budgeted construction cost of$780,000. Staff went to an independent firm, Snyder Langston, to obtain a comparison cost estimate for the facility under design. Snyder Langston verged the cost estimate prepared by Lord Fleming Architects as appropriate for this type of design and construction. In February 1998, Staff reported to the PDC Committee on the status of the Warehouse design and the cost estimate overrun for the facility. The PDC Committee directed Staff to continue with the design and present a budget amendment to the PDC Committee when the plans and specifications were ready for approval. In June 1998, Staff presented to the PDC Committee the completed plans and specifications and the final construction cost estimate of$1,110,000. On the recommendation of the PDC Committee, the Board of Directors approved the plans and specifications, as well as a budget increase of$385,000, bringing the total project budget to $1,564,000. On October 6, 1998, thirteen bids were received ranging from $1,063,838 to $1,885,000. The Architect's estimate was $1,100,000. The first low bid, PDG Builders, was rejected as non-responsive by legal counsel as a result of the exclusion on the face of its bid. The responsible low bid is KPRS Construction Services, Inc. for$1,075,000. The Director of Engineering recommends award of the contract to KPRS Construction Services, Inc. Construction completion is scheduled for December 1999. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed, because the recommendation is to award the lowest responsible bidder. CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989, under the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. G NrpiaeaMpenEa Oral)R.�.om 0 B rl Ox Eol a..,ee � Page 2 ATTACHMENTS 1) Budget Information Table 2) Bid Tabulation and Recommendation 3) Letter from Legal Counsel addressing Bid Protests KfM:jo:jam:jo G:1ntglobalV genda Draft ReportsUolnt Boards\Warehouse Job No.P2-65,Dec 98 Boartl doc.dot G NIgbYMVndae ft Repmus .4 aua %Wa,eho eJM No.nt .esNB dx dM Rertsea � Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Warehouse at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-65 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design Consultant $ 95,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ 75.000 $ 67,385 $ - $ 67,385 $ 43,779 65% Design Stall $ 140.800 $ 70,800 $ - $ 70,800 $ 70,800 $ - $ 70,800 $ 65,517 93% Building Permits $ 45,600 $ 15,600 $ - $ 15,600 $ 15,600 $ - $ 15,600 $ 2,568 16% Construction Staff $ 117,600 $ 181.600 $ - $ 181,600 $ 181,600 $ - $ 181,600 $ 0% Construction $ 780,000 $ 1,110.000 $ - $ 1,110.000 $ - $ 1,075,000 $ 1,075,000 $ 0% Contingency $ - $ 111,000 $ - $ 111,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 1.179,000 $ 1,564,000 $ - $ 1,664,000 $ 335,385 $ 1.075,000 $ 1,410,385 $ 111,864 7% Includes costs such as overhead, materials.legal services,and geotechnical services HAwp.disWng1 dgetWWgelbl-Dec 98 BMW Revise!W24198 a October 6, 1998 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 1 BID TABULATION WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 2 Job No. P2-65 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $1,110,000 Budget Amount: $1,564,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. PDG Builders` $ 1,063,838 2. KPRS Construction Services, Inc. • $ 1,075,000 3. Shook Building Systems, Inc. $ 1,166.443 4. Varkel Construction, Inc. $ 1,222,000 5. Sunpeak Construction $ 1,284,920 6. Amelco Construction $ 1,326,000 7. A.R. Willinger Co. ` $ 1,331,920 8. Phoenix National $ 1.395,000 9. Ocean State Development• $ 1,427,800 10. Tri Span Inc. $ 1,500,120 11. States Link Construction' $ 1,513,813 12. Atek Construction $ 1,732,000 13. FTR International, Inc. $ 1,885,000 Legal Counsel has reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and has determined the low bid, PDG Builders, to be non-responsi I, therefore, recommend award to KPRS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. ' the slid amount of$1,075,000 as the lowest and best bid. - David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering ' Contractors original calculations incorrect and are changed to our correct calculations. \Vadon)datal WiP.dtalengUOSS 8 CONTRACTST2.651P2-65 Bid Tab.doc Form Revised 0"9198 OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 •Fountain Vallev.CA 92728-8127 •(714)962-2411 BID SUMMARY WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-65 PDG BUILDERS KPRS,INC. SHOOK Item Approx.Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ 979,048.00 $ 979,048.00 $ 975,000.00 $ 975,000.00 $ 1,086,383.00 $ 1,086,383.00 3 3,000 CY $ 14.33 $ 42,990.00 $ 10.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 13.07 $ 39,210.00 4 5,000 CY $ 8.26 $ 41,300.00 $ 5.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 7.17 $ 35,850.00 Subtotal EPDGBUILDERS j'pn'1 $ - $ - •Add (+) or Delete " - $ .. - $ - $ - $ - �$ - Total Amount of Bid - 1 3,y8�'$,¢(f, KPRS,INC. SHOOK VARKEL CONSTRUCTION,INC. SUNPEAK CONSTRUCTION AMELCO CONSTRUCTION Item Approx. Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 11,500.00 $ 11,500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.OD 2 1 Lump Sum $ 1,139,500.00 $ 1,139,500.00 $ 1,135,000.00 $ 1,135,000.00 $ 1,257,500.00 $ 1,257,500.00 3 3,000 CY $ 12.50 $ 37.500.00 $ 23.34 $ 70,020.00 $ 8.50 $ 25,500.00 4 5,000 CY $ 8.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 13.68 $ 68,400.00 $ 8.40 $ 42,000.00 Subtotal $ - FOR;,' $ - •Add (+)mun or Delete (-) $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - Total Aot of Bid a 1 " WROW I4 VARKEL CONSTRUCTION,INC. SUNPEAK CONSTRUCTION AMELCO CONSTRUCTION HAwp.dta\sngVormslBid Docs1p2-65 Bid Summery 1 of 3 1112196 t BID SUMMARY WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-65 A.R.WILLINGER CO. PHOENIX NATIONAL OCEANSTATE DEVELOPMENT Item Approx. Qty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Pdce Price Pdce Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 2.100.00 $ 2,100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ 1,278,920.00 $ 1,278,920.00 $ 1,326,250.00 $ 1.326.250.00 $ 1,313,000.00 $ 1,313,000.00 3 3,000 CY $ 6.30 $ 18,900.00 $ 11.25 $ 33,750.00 $ 16.60 $ 49.800.00 4 5,000 CY $ 6.40 $ 32,000.00 $ 7.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 8.00 $ 40,000.00 Subtotal $ - �. ,., ,a.-. $ - $ 'Add (+) or Delete(-) $ - Total Amount of Bid i 0, xfli'l'5 pip ! A.R.WILLINGER CO. PHOENIX a OCEANSTATE DEVELOPMENT TRI SPAN,INC. STATES LINK CONSTRUCTION ATEK CONSTRUCTION Item Approx. Qty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 21,420.00 $ 21.420.00 $ 17,851.00 $ 17,851.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 2 1 Lump Sum $ 1,386,600.00 $ 1,386,600.00 $ 1,405,522.00 $ 1,405,522.00 $ 1.646.000.00 $ 1,646,000.00 3 3,000 CY $ 12.85 $ 38.550.00 $ 14.28 $ 42,840.00 $ 12.00 $ 36,000.00 4 5,000 CY $ 10.71 $ 53,550.00 $ 9.52 $ 47.600.00 $ 8.00 $ 40,000.00 Subtotal $ - $ i $ - ._#.. - -Add(+)or Delete (-) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Amount of Bid ". ';'/ 0 ; TRI SPAN,INC. STATES LINK CONSTRUCTION ATEK CONSTRUCTION H A.P.dt.l..0if..MBid Doc.\p2-65 Bid Summery 2 of 3 f 1/2/98 BID SUMMARY WAREHOUSE AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-65 FTR INTERNATIONAL,INC. COMPANY NAME COMPANY NAME Item Approx. Qly Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 1 Lump Sum $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - 2 1 Lump Sum $ 1,780,000.00 $ 1,780,000.00 $ - $ $ $ - 3 3,000 CY $ 15.00 $ 45,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 4 5,000 CY $ 10.00 $ 50.000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - Subtotal $ - $ - $ - 'Add (+) co Delete (-) $ - $ $ - $ - $ Tmount of Bid �. j9� '$0 otal A FTR INTERNATIONAL,INC. COMPANY NAME COMPANY NAME HAwp.EtelengVorm0ad1 DocMp2-65 Bid Summery 3 of 3 1112/98 -10. 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I Ton eaa. • 12116/9B AGENDA REPORT I[em NU ber Item Nu be Orange County Sanitation Di Ct FROM: David LuDIM I ctor of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT PLANNING FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Cooperative Agreement with Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District authorizing the following: (1) A method for charging staff time to the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System; and (2) A reimbursement procedure for allocating grant monies obtained for the GWR System. SUMMARY In July 1998, the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee recommended approval of a second amendment to the Cooperative Agreement between Orange County Water District (Water District) and Orange County Sanitation District (Sanitation District) to account for the following changes: • Incorporating Staff charges for time and benefits to the GWR System, provided the General Manager (or designee) approves the activity • Providing a procedure for allocating grant receipts and issuing equal credit to the Sanitation District and Water District for shared project expenses PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Because grants require specific information regarding "matching funds" and how they are to be used, the agreement will need to be amended to include an allocation formula for staff charges and receipts of grant funds. c M1910W M smd.D.n Repomuu,1 Boa,m1GWR AR 1216H a«as Page 1 The Water District will receive all grant monies and divide expenditures between the two districts. Grant proceeds will be deducted from project costs before the Sanitation District approves the expenditures. The Sanitation District will then receive grant credit against any amounts owed to the Water District, followed by an invoice for the balance due. The Water District will continue to provide periodic statements to the Sanitation District for project expenses, as required by the original Agreement. The periodic statements will generally appear as follows: (A+B-C -B=Invoice to OCSD l 2 ) A = Cost of Water District Staff and Outside Services B = Cost of Sanitation District Staff and Outside Services C = Grants Staff believes that the above changes to the Agreement are necessary for allocation of staff charges and accurate accounting for grant purposes. Amendment No. 2 was approved by the Sanitation District and Water District General Counsels. The Water District Board of Directors also approved the amendment in August 1998. ALTERNATIVES Not approving the amendment. District staff does not recommend this alternative because staff charges and other services will be excluded from the reimbursement agreement. In addition, each agency will decrease their opportunity to broaden the base for"matching funds" through grants received. CEQA FINDINGS The Draft Environmental Impact Report/Statement for the Groundwater Replenishment System was filed on November 5, 1998. ATTACHMENTS None AA:jam:jo G Nt9bbaM9enda Oral Repo Ua ,,Rbild6MfWR AR 121698 dM dM Page 2 1 i `�� li � a� } r ` � i . ' ' ,1� V i I�r�' � I 1 � .• d .:. y �"ry i4 I' r J b-. � � 7 r �� T J �. '. �. � ,�� �= fig "� - � �'- A ; ' .: � � � ,�i �' �J ��tJ 1 }.� y fit, fr }', . �� � i� I �9 �� �: � �� � 5 c �~ P' � � I• 1 � . �,. , �(yy 1• � �'' , . � ��, T �' t � � � � F 't 1 ; ,. 'l �� �- � l f r u r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT r FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 r r u Prepared By: r Department of Finance Accounting Division Michael D. White, CPA Controller r u u u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) u y IW' V�I1 Iu U u u u u u r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report r Table of Contents For the Year Ended June 30, 1998 r r INTRODUCTORY SECTION: page Letterof Transmittal..................................................................................................................... GFOACertificate of Achievement................................................................................................ b( rBoard of Directors........................................................................................................................ x OrganizationChart....................................................................................................................... xi Mapof Service Area..................................................................................................................... A r FINANCIAL SECTION: Independent Auditors' Report....................................................................................................... 1 Combined Financial Statements(General Purpose Financial Statements): r Combined Balance Sheets.................................................................................................. 4-8 Combined Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in RetainedEarnings ........................................................................................................... 8 r Combined Statements of Cash Flows................................................................................. 7-8 Notesto Financial Statements............................................................................................. 9-28 Combining Financial Statements: Combining Balance Sheet................................................................................................... 30-31 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in RetainedEarnings............................................................................................................ 32-33 CombiningStatement of Cash Flows.................................................................................. 34-35 r STATISTICAL SECTION: Expenses by Type-Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................. 37 r Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source-Last Ten Fiscal Years....................................... 38 Property Tax and User Fee Levies and Collections-Last Ten Fiscal Years .............................. 39 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property- LastTen Fiscal Years.............................................................................................................. 40 Property Tax Rates-Direct and Overlapping Governments- LastTen Fiscal Years.............................................................................................................. 41 PrincipalUsers............................................................................................................................. 42 r Ratio of Annual Debt Service-Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................. 43 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt.............................................................................. 44 Bond Coverage-Last Ten Fiscal Years...................................................................................... 48 Demographic Statistics-Last Ten Fiscal Years.......................................................................... 48 Property Values, Construction and Bank Deposits- LastTen Fiscal Years .............................................................................................................. 47 Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Served by The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ............................................................. 48 InsuranceIn Force....................................................................................................................... 49 Comparison of Volume of Wastewater Treated With Expenses by Type-Last Ten Fiscal Years 50 r Biosolids Produced-Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................................ 51 MiscellaneousStatistics............................................................................................................... 52 r Y�1 u u u u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) u u .0 u u u u u u u u u u CSDOC Introductory Section For the Fiscal Year Ended .lime 30, 1998 r 'S O Q r n C'* O r Ln co n ct r r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT e ses Phase: w(714)962-2411 September 23, 1998 tailing.rid,...: P.O.Be.8127 Teenteln Valleµ CA 92728-8127 The Board of Directors of the went add...: Orange County Sanitation District, _944 Ellis Avenue Orange County, California Fountain Valle,CA 92708-7018 Submitted herewith is the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998. This report includes all of the individual District funds as of June 30, 1998 and was prepared by the Accounting Division of the Districts' Finance Department. McInber A rel. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, 0 including all disclosures, rests with the Districts. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed cities data are accurate in all material respects and are reported in a manner designed to present fairly the see An.nelm financial position and results of operations of the Districts. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader area to gain an understanding of the Districts'financial activities have been included. Beene Park Cypress Vell, The report presented herewith consists of three arts: 1 an introductory section consisting of a letter of eas Panareon transmittal, a Governmental Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement, a listing of the Board cane, Grove of Directors, a Districts' organization chart, and a map of the individual Districts; (2) a financial section :°"°etas arson consisting of the independent auditors' report, eneral u purpose financial statements, and combining Irvine 9 P9 P rP 9 eas La H.bra statements of the individual District Enterprise Funds; and (3) a statistical section consisting of pertinent La Pac'a financial and nonfinancial data that presents historical trends and other information about the Districts. Lee Alernrtos Newport Beech Orange Included within the accompanying financial statements are all of the organizations, activities, and Placand. functions controlled by the Districts Boards of Directors in accordance with the Governmental Accounting Serve Ann seal e..an Standards Board Statement Number 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity". For the purpose of this Stanton evaluation, control was determined by the Boards responsibility for (1) adoption of the budgets and user oil.Park charges, (2) taxing authority, and (3) establishment of policies. The reporting entity and its services are Yorbe Linde described in further detail in Note 1 of the financial statements. L Incµ of Orange sr•,t.,v m.criet. GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE Coate Ms. Mltlwer City am m.tel.t. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, incorporated in 1954, encompasses the Northern section of Orange County. The Districts provide wastewater treatment for an area of the County covering spa Irvine Paneh 471 square miles and serving a population of 2,340,000, or approximately 87%of the County's population. During 1997-98, the Districts were made up of nine separate public corporations. Each District is governed by a representative from each city or sanitary district within the District, and a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each District has its own budget and is responsible for the construclion and maintenance of its own collection system. All Districts, except Districts 13 and 14, receive their own share of the one-percent ad valorem property tax levy. In addition, all Districts except -To Protect Me Public Health,antl the Environment tivough Ercelbnte in viestewater Systems- u u District 14, collect user fees from property owners. District 14 receives contributions from user fees collected by the Irvine Ranch Water District. I In April of 1998, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange passed Resolution No. 98-140 ordering the consolidation of the nine County Sanitation Districts into a new, single sanitation district, to be known as the Orange County Sanitation District, effective July 1, 1998. This action was recommended to the Board by the Local Agency Formation Commission in order to simplify governance structures, reduce the size of the Board, ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making and consolidate accounting and auditing processes. The boundaries of the nine previous districts will remain intact far the purpose of collecting sewer user fees, at the previously established rate schedules,and will be referred to as revenue areas. The purpose of the Districts'wastewater management program is to protect the public's health, preserve L the beneficial uses of the coastal waters, and maintain air quality. The objectives of operating the treatment plants are to process and dispose of the treated wastewater and the separated solids in ; ; accordance with Federal,state, and local laws including the Environmental Protection Agency. L The Districts sewerage system includes approximately 650 miles of sewers that convey wastewater generated within the Districts' boundaries to the Districts' two wastewater treatment plants, Reclamation Plant No. 1 located in the City of Fountain Valley, and Treatment Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach. Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity of 108 million gallons per day (mgd). Treatment Plant No. 2's designed primary treatment capacity is 186 mgd. Approximately 50% of the advanced primary effluent also receives secondary treatment. Both plants are master-planned for a future primary and secondary treatment capacity of 240 mgd for a combined total of 480 mgd. Outflows of treated wastewater from the two plants are combined, disinfected, and discharged to the ocean off the Huntington Beach coast through an outfall pipe that is 120 inches in diameter and approximately five miles long. The last mile of the outfall pipe is a diffuser that dilutes the wastewater with seawater in a relic of 148 parts seawater to one part treated wastewater at an average depth of 185 feet. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK Lg The Orange County Progress Report prepared by the California State University, Fullerton Center for ( I Demographic Research predicts continued moderate but steady economic growth for 1999. in their July (� 1998 report, the Center for Demographic Research indicates that 50,200 jobs were created in 1997, a 75 percent increase over the previous year. In addition, the 1997-98 assessed value of taxable property j within the Districts'boundaries increased$2.769 billion or 2.2 percent from the prior year. u In May 1997, a new user fee rate schedule was adopted that provides for gradual increases over the next five years for four of the nine districts beginning in fiscal year 1997-98. The two districts in need of the largest adjustments voted to extend their increases over a ten-year period beginning in 1997-98, a move designed to ease the immediate impact of those increases on their residents. Pending completion of the new strategic plan, it is anticipated that three districts will require no changes in their sewer service user ( j fees over the next five years. Prior to this increase, the Districts had been operating without an increase u in sewer service fees over the last five years by deferring the construction of new facilities and by reorganizing and streamlining operations which resulted in the reduction of actual staffing levels by 93 positions, or 14.9 percent of the workforce, primarily through attrition. However, rate increases became ii �i r r inevitable as the Districts' capital improvement and rehabilitation requirements and Certificate of Participation debt obligations grew beyond the Districts'ability to pay solely from property tax proceeds. r In 1998, the Districts conducted an in-depth review of the agency's reserve policies. This review included a survey of the reserve policies of 23 other public agencies as a tool to assist in the evaluation of the underlying economic assumptions supporting the Districts reserve policy. As of June 30, 1998, the Districts designated retained eamings totaled $373 million and have been earmarked for the following specific purposes in accordance with the revised accumulated funds policy: Designated For Cash Flow Contingency $ 63 million Designated For Self-Insurance 89 million Designated For Capital Improvements 171 million Designated For Debt Service Requirements 33 million Designated For Rate Stabilization 17 million Total Designated Retained Earnings $ 373 million r MAJOR INITIATIVES r Strategic Plan The District is currently undergoing a major strategic planning effort that will define goals, operational commitments and associated financial requirements for the next ten years. The strategic plan revises many of the assumptions used to develop the District's existing planning document, including the population and land use projections, the level of building activity within the service area and the volume of r wastewater treated. The plan, which is expected to be completed in the Spring of 1999, will also provide an operations and financial plan, including a review of the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities, and a study r of the ocean oulfall system. Reinvention r During 1996-97, the Districts Assessment and Reinvention Team (DART) was formed with the goal of reinventing the business processes of the Districts' in order to reduce the cost of operations while ,r increasing the level of efficiency to exceed that of the most efficient wastewater treatment facility. Operations and Maintenance reinvention efforts to date, resulting from new work methods, staff downsizing and technology enhancements, have already generated a savings of $3.49 million. At the conclusion of the forthcoming implementation phase, it is estimated that an annual savings of $1.44 million will occur each year thereafter. Following is a summary and status on the five phases identified to complete the reinvention process. r . Phase I -Competitive Assessment This effort began with a review of the Districts' operations by an automation consulting firm that r specializes in the water and wastewater. This review compared the Districts' operations to privately contracted operation and identified areas where operating efficiency could be improved and costs could be reduced. Completed in March 1996, the results of the review indicated that the Districts' operating costs were higher than the model of a privately contracted operation. The r iii r L L study identified approximately 86 million of potential savings within the operations and maintenance of the Districts. L • Phase II—Development of Mission &Goals During this phase, DART created its Mission and Goals for the reinvention process and outlined a Project Plan. The Phase II Report was issued in January 1997 and contains the results of a four- month study of the available industry best practices options. Following are the major topics reported on in the Phase II Report: L evaluation of the proper application of technology to the reinvention process. analysis of work force,work distribution, and skill enhancement strategies. I . -identification of other departments and divisions outside operations and maintenance IJ that would be affected by any proposed changes for the purpose of including these "stakeholders"in the reinvention effort -redirection of the various support groups to the core business function of wastewater treatment • Phase III—Reinvention Development The reinvention development report was submitted to the Board of Directors in June of 1998. This report documents the reinvention plan and documents the following accomplishments: completed the development and training of the DART task teams. -performed a detailed evaluation of current business practices and work practices. assessed external benchmarks and industry best practices. -developed recommended changes and modifications to the current business and work practices,organizational structures, and application technology. �+ -developed an implementation strategy and approach for the recommended changes and modifications. i • Phase IV—Implementation V In this phase, the reinvention implementation plan will be implemented and monitored. This L implementation process is expected to take three to five years, depending on the specific elements of the practices, or tools undergoing change. The reinvention implementation will begin in the first quarter of fiscal year 1998-99. V • Phase V—Process Monitoring and Measurement Shortly after Phase IV is underway, this phase will measure, at various intervals, the actual y results against the expected results of the changes and modifications. This is the "continuous improvement" aspect of the reinvention process. Reinvention is an ongoing effort that is continuously monitored and changed as needed. Sewer Service Fees V In 1997-98, the rate advisory committee, comprised of representatives from industrial, commercial, and residential users, analyzed the Districts' rate structure to determine whether user fees are equitable L among residences and industry. Their review resulted in a proposal to add several non-residential user categories that would be based upon the average flow and strength of wastewater discharged for that property type. L Iv . r r In June 1998, the Directors approved a revision of the sewer service user fee structure by expanding the number of non-residential categories from one to twenty-three, and basing rates on average quantity and ,r strength of discharge per category. The increase In the number of categories will allow for a more equitable fee structure and may also allow for future reductions in single-family residential fees. r SERVICE EFFORTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS r In June 1998, the Districts' received renewal of their ocean discharge permit from the Environmental ,r Protection Agency and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The new permit, which is effective to June 2003, Includes a renewal of the Districts' wavier from discharging 100 percent secondary-treated effluent. Currently, the Districts' discharge a blend of 50 percent advanced primary and 50 percent secondary effluent The new permit will allow the Districts' Board of Directors to reevaluate the effluent blend. The new permit also provides for changes in the monitoring requirements with less repetitive monitoring for pollutants, which are not usually found in the Districts' effluent, and additional bacteria tests along the shoreline. r In April 1998, the Districts' employees newsletter, The Pipeline, received the first place award in the internal newsletter category in statewide competition sponsored by the California Association of Public r Information Officials, an affiliation of the League of California Cities. r ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY CONTROLS r The Districts' accounting records are maintained on the accrual basis for all funds. In developing and evaluating the Districts' accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition: and (2) the r reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and r judgments by management We believe that the Districts' internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions. ,r Each year the Districts' Board of Directors adopts an annual operating plan. Joint works'budgets are first prepared that identify the specific capital projects and operating activities to be undertaken by the Districts during the year. Upon adoption, Districts' staff allocates the joint works' budgets proportionately to each of the individual Districts and obtains individual District budget approval. The budgetary level of control, the level at which expenses cannot exceed budget, is exercised at the District, or fund level. All of the Districts have adopted a Uniform Purchasing Policy that identifies the agreed upon purchasing standards. r ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS Enterprise funds are used to account for the operations of the Districts, which are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises. This allows the Districts to determine that the costs r v L U (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing wastewater management services on a continuing basis are financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Sewer service user fees are evaluated annually based primarily on budget requirements for total operation, maintenance and capital L expenditures in providing wastewater management services. Property tax revenues are dedicated for the payment of debt service. Comparative data covering the Districts'enterprise operations over the past two fiscal years is as follows: L Amount Percent Summary of of Increase of Increase j Revenues and Expenses 1997-98 1996-97 Decrease Decrease y Operating revenues $56,290,836 $62,528,809 $(6,237,973) (9.98)% L Operating expenses, Including depreciation 85,706,557 89,726,903 4,0( 20,346) (4.48)% Operating income(loss) (29.415,721) (27,198,094) (2,217,627) (8.15)% Non-operating income, net 40,746,355 28,783,119 11,963,236 41.56% j Net income $ 11,330,634 $ 1,585,025 $ 9,745,609 614.86% 1� L Operating revenues decreased primarily because of a $6.3 million, or 10.13 percent decline in service charges. The decline in service charges is a direct result of $6.8 million in user fees refunded to commercial users in 1997-98. These refunds, which in most cases go back four years, were provided to commercial users who provided documentation that their actual usage was less than what was calculated Lr by the Districts' square footage formulas. Although more equitable rates have been established by the rate advisory committee that should limit the number and dollar amount of future rebates, the District will always be subject to rebates to those commercial customers who can establish that their actual usage in u any one year was less than the amount that was calculated based on square footage and average use. The 4.48 percent decrease in net operating expenses is primarily attributable to the efforts made by the L Districts' in reorganizing and streamlining operations. These efforts have resulted in the elimination of 56 full time equivalent positions at a savings of$2.8 million in salaries and benefits over the prior year. In addition, contractual services were reduced by$1.7 million,or 17.2 percent. I The 41.56 percent, or$11.9 million increase in net non-operating income is comprised of a$9.8 million, or Ir 19.00 percent increase in nonoperafing income and a $2.2 million, or 9.66 percent decrease in non- operating expenses. The increase in non-operating income includes a $6.9 million, or 33.1 percent increase in interest revenues and a$3.1 million, or 10.97 percent increase in property tax revenues. The increase in interest revenues is primarily attributable to the higher yields earned in investments over the prior year, up 1.72 percent over the pdor to 7.15 percent, and to the recognition of$1.5 million in earnings L. due to the increase in the fair value of investments. The$3.1 million increase in property tax revenues is reflective of the current rebound in the real estate market as total assessed valuations have also increased over the prior year by 2.2 percent. G The 9.56 percent decrease in non-operating expenses is primarily attributable to the decrease of $2.0 million in interest expense over the prior year primarily due to the favorable decline in the month-to-month rates on the Districts'variable rate certificates of participation debt program. L vi r r DEBT ADMINISTRATION At June 30, 1996, the Districts had a number of debt issues outstanding. These issues, net of applicable unamortized discounts, included $384.8 million of certificates of participation and $15,000 of general obligation bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Pooes Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services. Pending completion of the strategic plan, the Districts are projecting $1.5 billion in future joint capital r improvements out to the year 2020. In accordance with the Districts long-term debt fiscal policy, 50 percent of these improvements will be funded through current revenues with the other 50 percent being funded through the issuance of new debt. No new debt was issued in 1997-98 and no new debt is r scheduled to be issued in 1998-99. However, $396.5 million of debt financing is forecasted over the next ten years due to the$816 million of capital improvement requirements over the same time period. CASH MANAGEMENT r The Districts' investment portfolio, except for the Districts' debt service reserves, investments with the State Local Agency Investment Fund, and overnight repurchase agreements of idle cash within the r Districts' general bank account, are managed by an outside money manager, Pacific Investment Management Company, who perform the daily investment activities, and by Mellon Trust, who serve as the Districts' independent custodian bank. This externally, managed portfolio consists of a short term investment pool of $17,972,000 at June 30, 1998 that has maturities out to 180 days, and a long-term r investment pool of $305,437,000 that has maturities out to five years. Investments of this externally managed investment portfolio consist of U.S. Government securities, corporate bonds, and commercial paper. Investments of the Districts'debt service reserves totaling$32.8 million consist of bank investment r contracts of$18.3 million with Texas Commerce Bank and State Street Bank, maturing out to August 1, 2013, and$14.5 million in open-ended mutual funds. Interest earnings for the year were $27,897,000, an increase of$6.939,000 over the prior fiscal year total r of$20,958,000. This increase is primarily due to the 7.15 percent average yield on maturing investments earned in 1997-98, an increase of 1.72 percent over the 5.43 percent earned in the prior year, and in the in the recognition of$1.5 million in earnings due to the increase in the fair value of investments. r ,r RISK MANAGEMENT For the year ended June 30, 1998, the Districts were self-insured for a portion of workers'compensation and property damage. The self-insured portion for workers compensation is $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess r insurance coverage to $200 million for fire, flood, and other perils. The self-insured portion for property, damage covering earthquake is $250,000 or 5% per unit of insurance, whichever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to $40 million. The Districts also maintain outside comprehensive boiler and r machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000. The Districts are insured for general liability up to $25 million with a self-insured portion of$100,000. r vli L L Districts' management believes that there are no outstanding claims as of June 30, 1998 that would materially affect the financial position of the Districts. v INDEPENDENT AUDIT An audit of the books, financial records and transactions of the Districts is conducted annually by L independent certified public accountants. The Districts selected the accounting firm of Moreland & L Associates to perform the audit for the year ended June 30, 1998. The auditors' report on the Districts' combined financial statements and combining statements is included in the financial section of this report j This report renders an unqualified opinion on the Districts' combined financial statements for the year L ended June 30, 1998. L CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING L The Government Finance Officers' Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the County Sanitation Districts of L Orange County for the Districts'comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended June 30, 1997. This was the fourth consecutive year that the Districts has received this award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports b+ must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current L comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. L ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report could not have been accomplished without the dedicated services of the Accounting Division staff, and I would like to especially express my appreciation to Dan Dillon who assisted in its preparation. L I would also like to thank the Districts' Boards of Directors, the General Manager, and the Director of Finance for their interest and support in conducting the financial operations of the Districts in a responsible and progressive manner. L Respectfully submitted, A"U 41 Z�'4 W V Michael D.White, CPA L Controller L vill j r Certificate of Achievement r for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, r California For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1997 ,r A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada to r government wits and public employee retirement system whose comprehensive annual financial reports(CAFRs) achieve the highest standards in government accounting �+ and financial reporting. Preslaentp,o r Executive Director r r r ix J L+ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Board of Directors As of June 30, 1998 L. ALTERNATE AGENCY/CITIES ACTIVE DIRECTOR DISTRICT NO.(S) DIRECTOR V Anaheim Bob Zemel 2,3&13 Tom Daly- Brea Bumie Dunlap 2.3&13 Glen Parker Buena Park Patsy Marshall 3 Jack Mauller Cypress Anna L.Plercy 3 Tim Keenan Fountain Valley John Collins 2&3 Laurann Cook* v Fullerton Don Bankhead• 2&§ Jan Flory Garden Grove Bruce Broadwater- 2 Mark Layers L Mark Leyes 3 Bruce Broadwater• Huntington Beach Dave Sullivan 3&11 Tom Hannan Shirley Dettio6 11 Tom Harman V Irvine Christina Shea* 7&14 Barry Hammond Le Habra Steve Anderson 2&3 John Holmberg V La Palma Eva G.Miner Bradford 3 Paul F.Walker Los Alamitos Charles E.Sylvia 3 Ronald Batas• Newport Beach Jan Debay 5.6&7 John E. Noyes V John Noyes 5 Jan Debay, Orange Mark A.Murphy 1,2,7,13&14 Joanne Coontz• Placenta Norman Z.Eckenrode• 2 Constance Underhill Santa Ana Pat Mc Guigan 1,2.3&7 Thomas E.Lutz v Seal Beach George Brown 3 Marilyn Bruce Hastings Stanton Brian Donohue 3 Harry M.Dotson V Tustin Thomas R.Saltarelli 1,7,&14 Jim Potts Villa Park Barry Danes 2 Richard A. Freschi• Yorba Linda John M.Gullureon 2&13 Gene Wwner• Lr Sanitary Water Districts Ld Costa Mesa Sanitary District James M.Ferryman 1,6,&7 Arthur Perry La Midway City Sanitary District Margie L.Rice 3 James V.Evans Irvine Rench Water District Peer Swan 14 Darryl G.Miller County Areas L Members of the Board of Supervisors Todd Spitzer 1,2,3&11 William G.Steiner William G.Steiner 5,6,7, 13&14 Todd Splicer L ('Mayor) X L County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Organizational Chart As of June 30, 1998 r mumov ooixnove xxl aexexu. wwmumwra iwwaea omce uwwrurt wxowxwwex �^xux xsewi iwomv`nm avounowF imawu � mxuuwunow xeaoxxwa wxxae a¢xwva reuowwor uuwnuxce avmcea eron®um cwxxwwnnow wxw nxuwx xaasu�aearwq ixrowu,wx ovvumxa• reaww exowFFwro u!xwemxiwx �sowma icxwmunw uxxxwmawx auacFmr xxxiewwe eewncw uwiwmunax aowxwmamx uxiwe�wnm uxxwamanw wxmmumx '� eouloov werv• xcmuxnw mwsmx wowex marnx exwwxuwru enweewro wvxms xearoxrt vaaunee uvroxr eroixewm mwwxwa owwxa eecaerury wwnexuoe xowmimo vurxro eouunma nwawuroa Hurt vxuuma xenwvx wertro.� Fxxmrwwru mxnmronar r muwro wwwwwe w+xmxueF aurvax+ orvunarw mexw uuucexexr vsoaamv vmowwFro vwrt ro.v amnce ♦a....., ov¢w.mw mxma sve�a � vwrt �mcxvxu� MIIOMAIIfM M4x1EWICF EIECTIIG4♦ 1.a)1l/.iwM xix� uuxnxwae cvu�va� cwewnox vxmara r✓ J rr r r r rJ A rr Gq LA HABRA CG Gryt BREA r FULL ETOM YORBA I3 PLACENTIA LINDA UENA LA BARN ." PALNA a` AN IN O o CYPRES�S� VILLA 'I T PARK o LOS 3 ON ALAMITOS ORANGE 4AQ.'f1Y GARDEN GROVE SE ESTMINSTER ( ! I� -- SANTAI 0_ STIN q• ANA I II �4 AIN ALLEY NUNTING7dH BEACH_ I 9 on COSTA aE,,,,PACIFIC MESA IRVIN .. ` 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF . . , . r, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 xii CSDOC Financial Section For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1998 r T 7 4) - 7 n 07 N _ cr O 7 MI DOVE STREET.SUITE W NEWRORT BEACH.CALIFORNIA 925CO oreland &.Raao - j, (9a9)2 I1 s MCERTIFIED W&ICACCDUWWS 5To RANCHEROS DRIVE.SUITE M SAN MARCO,R,CA 9MS (750)752a3T0 September 23, 1998 The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District Independent Auditors'Report We have audited the accompanying Combined financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California (Districts) as of and for the years ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, as listed in the table of contents. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the Districts' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Combined financial statements based on our audits. We Conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits Contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Combined financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the Combined financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accountng principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall Combined financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the Combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Districts as of June 30, 1998 and 1997, and the results of its operations and Cash flows for the years then ended in Conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with Government Aud'Aina Standards, we have also issued our report dated September 23, 1998 on our consideration of the Districts' internal Control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations and contracts. Our audits were performed for the purpose of farming an opinion on the combined financial statements of the Districts taken as a whole. The accompanying Combining financial statements listed in the table of Contents _ are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the Combined financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the Combined financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects, in relation to the Combined financial statements taken as a whole. The statistical information listed in the table 1of Connntteennntss was — not audited by us and,accordingly,we do not express an opinion thereon.� t"Wl'G'1�'r'wl/•a" 1 u' u u u u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) L u LI u u u u u u 2 u J ..I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY J COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS J J J I J J ►1 J - i V J J 3 r u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Balance Sheets June 30, 1998 and 1997 ILt L 1998 1997 Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents(note 2) $ 25,283,084 $ 36,836,402 L, Investments(note 2) 190,563,202 148,137,859 Receivables: Accounts,net of allowances for uncollectibles 4,020,700 13898,871 Accrued interest 5,680.898 2:627,838 L Due from other Districts(note 12) 15,008,497 10,458,787 Due from other governmental agencies 90,167 1,898,668 Total receivables 24,800,322 28,883,764 L Inventories 4,394,026 4,400,651 Prepaid and other assets 307,187 163,800 Total current assets 245,327,820 218,422,276 Restricted assets: Cash and cash equivalents(notes 2 and 4) 46,198,804 65357,655 L Investments(note 2) 111,184,132 128:143,941 Receivables: Accrued Interest 538,821 2,952,430 Connection fees 2,061,775 754,643 L Due from other Districts(note 12) 12,134,152 3,930.430 Due from other governmental agencies 168,000 761.815 Other 559.312 135,224 Lt Total restricted assets 173,134,998 202,036,138 Due from other governmental agencies, j noncurrent(note l l)' 88,340.640 88,340,640 L Deferred charges 2,DS9,024 2,162,687 Property,plant and equipment,at cost(notes 3 and 8): Land 7,140,672 7,121.674 Sewage collection facilities 319,653,231 317,211,179 Sewage treatment facilities 513,729,012 507,349,211 Sewage disposal facilities 81,830,012 :1389462 Lr General plant and administrative facilities 98,637,497 3:621:529 Construction in progress 158,142,014 123,380,332 Total property, plant and equipment 1,177,132,438 1,130,033.387 V Less accumulated depreciation 376,288,552 343,432,730 Net property, plant and equipment 800,843,886 786,600,667 Excess purchase price over book value on acquired L.i assets(notes 5 and 8) 12,086,492 12,744,201 Other assets,at mat,less accumulated amortization 2,921,04-1 2,311,598 L Total assets $1,324,723,905 $1,310,618,177 (Confined) L See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. 4 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Balance Sheets(Continued) r June 30,1998 and 1997 r 1998 199T Current liabilities payable from current assets: r Accounts payable $ 5,593.293 $ 8.356,853 Accrued expenses 5.326,423 4.847,088 Other 2213 r Total current liabilities payable from current assets 10,921.929 13,203.941 r Current liabilities payable from restricted assets: Retentions payable 2.457,571 1,663,085 r Interest payable 4,710,258 5,56fir Deposits 1,817,146 2,921291 Due to other Districts(note 12) 27,142,649 14.389,218 Claims and judgments payable,current portion(note 4) 429,603 524,546 General obligation bonds payable,current portion (note 4) 15.000 15,000 Certificates of participation payable, cunenl portion r (note 4) 12,105,000 11,304,980 Total current liabilities payable from restricted assets 48,677.227 36,385,047 r Long-term liabilities: r Compensated absences(note 4) 3.065,600 2,814,800 Claims and judgments payable,noncurrent portion(note 4) 1.002,408 1,783,935 Arbitrage payable(note 4) - 180,156 ,r General obligation bonds payable, noncurrent portion (note 4) - 15,D00 Certificates of participation payable,noncurrent portion(note 4) 372,653,677 384.677,740 r Deferred revenue 80.408 80,408 Total long-term liabilities 376,802,093 389.552,039 r Total liabilities 436,401,M 439.141,027 Fund equity: Contributed capital(notes 5 and 8) 241.153.400 236,388,273 Retained earnings 647,169,256 635,108,877 Total fund equity 888,322,656 871,477,150 r Total liabilities and fund equity $1,324,723905 $1,310,618,177 r See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. r 5 r I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings For the years ended June 30, 1998 and 1997 6d i 1998 1997 L Operafing revenues: Service charges S 55.961.564 $ 62,Z70,407 Permit and inspection fees 329.2 268,402 Total operating revenues 56290.836 62,528,B09 Operating expenses other than depreciation and amortization: 6, Salaries and benefits 4,131,704 4,329,165 Utilities 434,688 670,985 Supplies 91,713 775,848 Contractual services 1,186.556 2.121,873 Dimctors'lees 91.806 96,029 Meetings and training 6,357 6,175 Repairs and maintenance 138,774 94,592 Joint operating fund expense allocation,net(note 6) 43211,557 46,930,489 I Other 692.820 18,439 Lrl Total operating expenses other than depreciation and amorozaton 49,865,475 54,443.386 ; Operating income before depreciation and �1 amortization 6.425,361 8.085,423 Depredation on contributed facilPoes 72,036 75073 i 1 Depredation on other facilities 35,111,337 34,550:735 V Amortization of excess purchase price over book value on , acquired!assets(notes 5 and 8) 657.708 657.709 1 t Operating income(loss) (29,415,721) (27,198,0911) 411 Nonoperdtmg revenues: Property taxes 31,297,109 28,192, L 960 I I Interest 27,896,829 20,957,589 Other 2,124,182 2,305,820 Total nonoperati revenues 61.308,120 51,517,369 L Nonopereting expenses: Interest 19.232,169 21236,935 Other 1,329,595 1,497,315 1 Total nonoperabng expenses 20,561,]85 22.734.250 Ind Net income 11,330.634 1,585,025 Add(notes 5andepreciation) and amortization related to contributed eRuiry V (notes s aria 8) 729.745 732.782 Net increase in retained earnings 12.050,379 2,317,807 beginning of year 635108,877 632.791.070 Retained earnings,beg g y Retained earnings,end of year E 8/7.189,256 S 835.108.BT7 V L See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. V 6 Ld r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Statements of Cash Flows For the years ended June 30, 1998 and 1997 1998 1997 Cash flows from operating activities: •+ Net cash provided(used)by operations $ 14,735,821 $5 610,369 r, Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Proceeds from property taxes 31,287.109 28,192,960 r Cash flows from(used by)capital and related financing activities: r Additions to property,plant and equipment (48,768,893) (54,236,300) Interest paid,net of amounts capitalized (20,007,881) (20,482,641) Principal payments on certificates of r participation (11,305.000) (10.684,999) Principal payments on bonds (15,000) (15,000) Proceeds from capital contributions 3,550.031 21,438,867 ,r Net cash provided(used)by capital and related financing activities (76,546.743) (63,940,273) r Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from the sale of investments 1,727,e41,475 863.370.389 Purchase of investments (1,755,107,009) (826.293.540) Interest received 27257,178 20.828,822 r Net cash provided(used)by investing activities (208,356) 57,905,671 Net increase(decrease)in cash and cash m equivalents (30,732,169) 27,768,727 r Cash and cash equivalents,beginning of year 102,194,057 74,425,330 Cash and cash equivalents,end of year $ 71.461,888 $102,194,057 r, (Continued) ,d See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. er 7 r U COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Statements of Cash Flows(Confined) For the years ended June 30, 1998 and 1997 1998 1997 Cash flows from operating activities: L Operating income(loss) $(29,415,721) $(27,198,094) Adjustments to reconcile operating income(loss) to net cash provided by operations: Depredation 35,183,373 34,625,808 �+ Amortization 667,709 657.709 Other non-operating revenues 2,124,182 2,366,820 Other non-operating expenses 0X15,955) (1,388,867) V Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease(increase)in accounts receivable 9,877,911 (8,914,268) Decrease Increase)in due from other districts (12.763.432) (14.389.217) L+ Decreasncrease)in due from other e I governmental agencies 2,412,318 2,576,248 _ Decrease Increase)in other receivables (724,088) (90000) Decrease Increase)in inventories SAW (440:392) L Decrease Increase)in prepaid and other assets (143,587) (29296) - Decrease(increase)in other assets,net of amortization (609.450) 981,131 `+ Increase(decease)in accounts payable (2,763,560) 5,688,433 Increase(decrease)in accrued expenses 299.179 346,243 Increase(decrease)in retentions payable 794.486 489,813 L Increase(decrease)in deposits (1,104,145) (239,959) Increase(decrease)in due to other _ districts 12,753,432 14,389,218 Increase(decease)in other liabilities 2.213 (35.247) L Increase(decrease)in compensated absences 250,800 103,300 Increase(decrease)in claims and judgments payable payable (876,470) 889,014 Net cash provided by operations $14,735.821 $ V L L I u L See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. ( . N 8 V L r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 r (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Reporting Entity The financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) include the ,r operations of nine separate Districts operating within the County of Orange, California. The Districts jointly own and operate certain sewage treatment and disposal facilities for the benefit of residents of Orange County, California. The Districts are managed by a joint administrative organization composed of directors appointed by the Districts. Each Individual District is governed by a board consisting of the mayor, or a designee, of each of the cities, or a representative from the local sewering district within the District and a member of the Board of Supervisors. The Districts utilize joint and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, which costs r are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow. The Districts' balance sheets reflect the allocated balance sheet accounts of the joint and capital outlay funds. The Districts are independent of and overlap many formal political jurisdictions. There are many governmental entities, including the County of Orange, that operate within the Districts' jurisdictions; however, financial Information for these entities is not included in the accompanying financial statements based on the following provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards r Board Statement 14: • Each entity has an independent elected governing body. • Each entity is solely responsible for its daily operations. +' • The Districts are neither entitled to operating surpluses nor responsible for operating deficits of any of the entities. • Each entity is exclusively responsible for administration of its own fiscal affairs. In April of 1998, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange passed Resolution No. 98-140 ordering the consolidation of the nine County Sanitation Districts into a new, single sanitation district, to be known as the Orange County Sanitation District, effective July 1, 1998. This action r was recommended to the Board by the Local Agency Formation Commission in order to simplify govemance structures, reduce the size of the Board, ease administrative processes, streamline decision-making and consolidate accounting and audking processes. r The boundaries of the nine previous districts will remain intact for the purpose of collecting sewer user fees, at the previously established individual rate schedules, and will be referred to as revenue areas. r Basis of Accounting Each of the Districts operates as an enterprise activity. Enterprise funds account for operations r that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, where the intent of the Board of Directors is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or •r recovered primarily through user charges. Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. All enterprise funds are accounted for on the flow of r economic resources measurement focus and use the accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they are earned, and their expenses are recognized when they are incurred. (Continued) 9 r L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 L Unbilled sewer service receivables are recorded at year end. The Districts apply all GASB pronouncements currently in effect as well as Financial Accounting Standards Board Statements and Interpretations,Accounting Principal Board Opinions and Accounting Research Bulletins of the Committee on Accounting Procedure issued on or before November 30, 1989. Operating Plans I`J Each year, Districts'staff prepare annual operating plans for each District. These annual operafing _ plans, as adopted by the respective Boards of Directors, are used to serve as a basis for L'monitoring financial progress, estimating the levy and collection of taxes and determining future service charge rates. During the year, these plans may be amended as circumstances or levels of operations dictate. Cash Equivalents L Investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. Investments L All investments are stated at fair value (the value at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation sale). Inventory Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, or first-out basis. Property, Plant and Equipment u Outlays for property, plant, equipment and construction in progress are recorded in the respective Districts. Such outlays may be for either individual District assets or their respective share of joint 4 assets. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, except for assets acquired by contribution, which are recorded at fair market value at the time received. Cost includes labor, materials; L+ outside services; vehicle and equipment usage; allocated indirect charges such as engineering, purchasing, supervision and other fringe benefits; and certain administrative and general L expenses. Net interest costs are capitalized on projects during the construction period. Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets using the straight-line method. The Districts generally follow the guidelines of estimated useful lives as recommended in the State of California Controllers Uniform System of V Accounts for Waste Disposal Districts, which range from 3 to 75 years. The fallowing are _ estimated useful lives for major classes of depreciable assets: Sewage collection facilities — 50 years, Sewage treatment facilities—40 years, Sewage disposal facilities —40 years and General y plant and administrative facilities— 11.5 years. Depreciation expense related to contributed plant and equipment is charged to contributed facilities. v Amortization Amortization of excess purchase price over book value of joint assets acquired is provided using the straight-line method over estimated useful life of 30 years. i (Continued) y" 10 L r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1997 rl Discounts on the certificates of participation are amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the installment obligations based on their effective interest rates (note 4). When certificates of participation have been refunded in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance, the related portion of the discount, acquisition costs and deferred gain or loss on terminated interest rate swaps are written off at the date of the refunding and classified as an extraordinary item in the accompanying combined statement of revenues, expenses, and changes in retained earnings(note 4). r Restricted Assets Certain assets are restricted to comply with debt service and capital project requirements. Specifically, the assets are restricted for the purposes of installment payments due on certificates ., of participation,joint treatment works expansion and capital expenditures for improvements. Interest Rate Swaps r The Districts enter into interest rate swap transactions in connection with the issuance of certificates of participation as part of their overall financing program. These interest rate swaps are accounted for as hedges, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to Interest expense over the terms of the swap agreement. Gains or losses on terminated interest rate swaps are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the remaining terms of the swap agreements, although the amortization may be accelerated in the case of a refunding of the related certificates of participation in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance(see discussion in Amortization above). Compensated Absences �+ The Districts' employees, other than operations and maintenance personnel, are granted vacation and sick leave in varying amounts with maximum accumulations of 200 hours and 560 hours for vacation and sick days earned but unused, respectively. Operations and maintenance personnel accrue"Personal Leave" at a rate of between 60 and 200 hours per year depending on years of service. Personal leave can be accumulated up to a maximum of 400 hours. r Vacation and sick leave benefits and personal days are recorded when earned in the accompanying Districts' financial statements under the caption "Compensated absences." In determining the estimated sick leave liability at June 30 of each year, the Districts assume that all employee accumulated sick leave balances will ultimately be paid out. Claims and Judgments 'r The Districts' record estimated losses, net of any insurance coverage under its self-insurance program (see Self-insurance Plans below) when it is probable that a claim liability has been incurred,and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Claims payable,which includes r an estimate for"incurred but unreported claims", is recorded in each of the Districts'funds. Property Taxes Property taxes attach an enforceable lien on property as of January 1. Taxes are levied on July 1 and are payable in two installments which become delinquent after December 10 and April 10. The County bills and collects the property taxes and remits them to the Districts in installments (Continued) 11 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 4 Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 ' u during the year. Districts' property tax revenues are recognized when levied to the extent that they are available to finance current operations. - r The County is permitted by State law (Proposition 13) to levy taxes at 1% of full market value (at time of purchase) and can increase the assessed value no more than two percent per year. The Districts receive a share of this basic levy proportionate to what was received in the 1976 to 1978 period. Joint Operations �. The Districts are co-participants in an agreement dated March 10, 1971, as amended July 1, 1985, - which provides for the joint construction,ownership and operation of certain treatment and disposal V property, plant, equipment and other assets. Under the agreement, the respective District equity percentages in jointly owned assets are based on gallons of sewage flow. Equity percentages are _. determined at the end of each fiscal year and prevail for the ensuing year. Construction costs of jointly owned assets are allocated to the various individual Districts. Joint V expenses are allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow during the year. Self-Insurance Plans For the year ended June 30, 1998, the Districts were self-insured for portions of workers' compensation, properly damage and general liability. The self-insurance portion of workers' compensation is $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $200 million for flood, fire and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquakes is rr $250,000 or 5% per unit of insurance,whichever is greater,with outside insurance coverage to$40 million. The Districts also maintain outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a j $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000. L+ The Districts are substantially self-insured for general liability coverage. During the past three fiscal years there has been only one claim settlement in excess of covered amounts. The expense - for that claim was accrued during fiscal year 1995-96 and the settlement of$5.1 million was paid L from the reserves of the Districts during the 1996-97 reporting period. There were no significant changes in insurance coverage during 1997-98 as well as for the previous year. I As of February 1, 1995, the Districts obtained outside insurance coverage for group medical claims u and are no longer self-insured. Districts'management believes that there are no unrecorded claims as of June 30, 1998 that would materially affect the financial position of the Districts. 4 Claims against the Districts are processed by outside insurance administrators. These claims are charged to claims expense based on amounts which will ultimately be paid. Claims incurred but not yet reported have been considered in determining the accrual for loss contingencies. `r Insurance expense is allocated to the individual Districts based on wastewater flow. (Continued) v 12 W r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 r Contributed Equity `+ Connection fees represent fees received from developers and residents to join new or extend existing trunk sewer systems in excess of the cost to connect Capital replacement charges represent fees charged to certain special districts and agencies for their proportionate share of ,r fixed asset expenditures. Connection fees and capital replacement charges are recorded as contributed equity. Deferred Compensation Plan The Districts offers its employees a deferred compensation plan established in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan permits all employees of the Districts to defer a �. portion of their salary until future years. The amount deferred is not available to employees until termination, refirement, death or for unforeseeable emergency. During the year ended June 30, 1998, the plan was amended so that the assets of the plan are now held in trust for the exclusive benefit of the participants and their beneficiaries. Since the plan assets are administered by an outside party and no longer subject to the claims of the Districts' general creditors, in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. r 32, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plans, these assets and the related liability of $10,940,356 have been removed from the financial statements of the Districts as of June 30, 1997. Restatements Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 31, Accounting and Financial Reporting r for Certain Investments and for External Pools, and Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 32, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Internal Revenue Cale Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plans that became effective for the year ended June 30, 1998 have been implemented. For comparative purposes, certain restatements were made to the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 1997. (2) Cash and Investinents r The Districts follows the practice of pooling cash and investments of all funds except for cash held by fiscal agents. Interest income earned on pooled cash and investments is allocated quarterly to the various funds based on month-end cash and investment balances. Interest income from cash r and investments of funds excluded from pooled cash is credited directly to the related fund. Deposits r Deposits in banks are maintained in financial institutions which provide deposit protection on the bank balance from the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation. The California Government Code requires California banks and savings and loans to secure local government deposits by r pledging government secunties equal to 110% of the deposits or by pledging first trust dead mortgage notes equal to 150%of the Deposits. r Deposits are categorized herein, in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASS) Statement No. 3, to give an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the Districts at year-end. (Continued) 13 r L l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 + . L Category 1- Insured or collateralized with securities held by the Districts or by its agent in the Districts'name. 4 Category 2- Collateralized with securities held by the financial institution's trust department or agent in the Districts' name. Category 3- Uncollateralized or collateralized, but the pledged securities are not held in the y Districts' name. Restricted investments, as classified on the balance sheet, are in reserve funds held by Chase Bank and State Street Bank as specified in the trust agreements (note 4). At June 30, 1998 and 1997, these investments were limited to deposits within bank investment contracts (BIC). Although the BIC with State Street Bank is classified as Category 3, as shown below, the depositor, AIG - Matched Funding Corporation, is required to pledge collateral in an amount equal to 103% of the amount of the investment contract if the long-term unsecured, unsubordinated debt securities of AIG falls below a S&P rating of'AA-"or below a Moody's rating of'Aa3°. i Investments Ir Statutes authorize the Districts to invest in obligations of the U.S. Government; state and local governmental agencies; negotiable certificates of deposits; bankers acceptance; commercial paper, reverse repurchase agreements; and a variety of other investment instruments which are allowable under the California Government Code section 53600 at seq. Investments are categorized herein, in accordance with GASS Statement No. 3, to give an L indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the Districts at year-end. Category 1- Insured or registered, or securities held by the Districts or their agent in the Districts' name. L, Category 2- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial _ institutions'trust department or agent in the Districts' name. Category 3- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial V institutions'trust department or agent but not in the Districts'name. The Districts invest in overnight repurchase agreements in order to maximize the yield on funds on deposit as a result of outstanding warrants. At June 30, 1998, the Districts total demand cash bank balance amounted to$3,661,589, of which $3,158,000 was invested in overnight repurchase agreements. Investments Not Subject to Categorization Investments in the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) are not categorized, as GASB Statement No. 3 does not require categorization of investment pools managed by another government. Also cash held by trustees are also not categorized because the underlying assets of the funds are invested within open- ended mutual funds. Decisions regarding these investments are made by fiscal agents for the 4 Districts who are acting in accordance with agreements entered into with the Districts. All such investments are not required to be categorized under interpretive guidelines issued by GASB. The management of the LAIF has indicated to the Districts'that as of June 30, 1998 the amortized L cost of the pool was $31,920,000,841 and the estimated fair value of the pool was(Continued) I I 14 61 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 r $31,932,227,970. Included in LAIF's Investment portfolio are certain derivative securities or similar ,r products in the form of structured notes, totaling$977,100,000 and asset-backed securities totaling $388,537,000. LAIF's (and the Districts') exposure to risk(credit, market or legal) is not currently available. .r A summary of deposits and investments were categorized as follows: r June 30, 1998 Carrying Amount Bank Deposits: Unrestricted Restricted Balance Category Demand cash accounts $ 658,086 (1,736,352) 503,589 2 Bank Investment Contracts- -with Chase Bank - 4,482.958 4.482,958 3 -with State Street Bank 13,813.498 13,813,498 3 r Total Deposits 658, 86 16,560.104 18,800,045 Investments: Repurchase agreement 1,427,854 1,730,146 3 Cash and investments with LAW 9,239.402 5.390.730 NIA Cash and investments with OCIP - 6.206 N/A U.S.Government Securities 153,133,147 89,345,562 1 Commercial Paper 2,562,912 1,495.333 1 Corporate Bonds 48.547,374 28,324.970 1 Cash and investments held with fiscal agents: Mutual funds 257,511 14,629.885 N/A Total Investments 215,168,200 140,822,832 Total Carrying Amount $215,826,286 157,382,936 Cash and cash equivalents and investments as reported on the combined balance sheet: Cash and cash equivalents $ 25,263,084 46,198.804 Investments 190,563,202 111,184,132 $215.826,286 157,382,936 Included in U.S. Government Securities, Commercial Paper and Corporate Bond investments are asset backed securities totaling $32,491,064 and, in Corporate Bond investments, floating rate corporate notes totaling$25,646,068. r r (Continued) 15 r VY COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 Summary of deposits and investments (continued):, u June 30, 1997 Carrying Amount Bank `, Deposits: Unrestricted Restricted Balance Cate no Demand cash accounts $ (363,885) (296,118) 783,575 2 Bank Investment Contracts- -with Chase Commerce Bank - 4,462,834 4,482,934 3 y -with State Street Bank 14.221.000 14,221,000 3 Total Deposits (363,885) 18.407.816 19.487,509 �r Investments: Repurchase agreement 1,303,363 1,060,637 3 Cash and investments with LAW 5,108,995 4,479.926 N/A Cash and investments with OCIP - 4,277 WA U.S.Government Securities 124,885,039 109,507.975 1 L Commercial Paper 30,986,189 27,170.868 1 Corporate Bonds 20,451,907 17,933,668 1 Cash and investments held with fiscal agents: V Repurchase agreements 602,653 528,448 3 Mutual funds 14,407,981 WA Total Investments 183,338,146 176,093,780 L Total Carrying Amount $182,974,261 193,501,596 Cash and cash equivalents and L investments as reported on the combined balance sheet: Cash and cash equivalents $ 36,836,402 65,357,655 i Investments 146.137.859 128,143,941 L $182.974,261 193,501,596 V Included in Corporate Bond investments are floating rate corporate notes totaling$7,103,266. The Districts invest in overnight repurchase agreements in order to maximize the yield on funds or deposit as a result of outstanding warrants. At June 30, 1997, the Districts total demand cash bank 61 balance amounted to$3,147,575, of which$2,364,000 was invested in overnight repurchase agreements. L+ L (Confiniald) L 16 L r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 r (3) Property, Plant, Equipment and Construction in Progress r Respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost,at June 30, 1998 and 1997 follows: ,r Property, Plant and Equipment r 1998 1997 District Jointly Separately r No. Owned Owned Total Total 1 $ 77,526,074 7,054,233 84,580,307 80,400,473 2 207.801,989 97,845.570 305,647,559 301,922,790 3 216.959,276 75,053,277 292,012,553 282,227,656 5 28,610,803 34,424,116 63.034,919 62,484,357 6 26,339,023 5,281,731 31,620,754 35,706,392 7 71,207,597 43,202,223 114,409,820 106,554,836 11 49,270,173 19,275,148 68,545,321 66,701,095 13 8,094,209 3,033,825 11,128,034 10,530,263 14 24,401,844 25,609,313 50,011,157 60,145.193 710,210,988 310,779.436 1,020,990,424 1,006,673,055 r Construction in Progress 1998 1997 District Jointly Separately No. Owned Owned Total Total 1 $ 15,779,389 - 15,779,389 12,304,654 2 41,034,730 439,445 41,474,175 33,235,656 3 41,807,885 3,811,104 45,618,989 38,894,311 5 5,876,761 1,752,182 7,628,943 4,878,349 6 4,920,469 3,142,691 8,063,160 4,627,919 r 7 12,598,430 3,070,892 15,669,322 10,453,965 11 8,763,953 7,659,040 16,422,993 13,574,521 13 1,314,441 - 1,314,441 936,706 r 14 3,954,301 216,301 4.170,602 4,454,261 136,050,359 20,091,655 156,142,014 123,360,332 Total property, plant and equipment $846,261,347 330,871,091 1,177,132,438 1,130,033,387 r (Continued) 17 r Ld COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY v Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 L (4) Long-Tenn Debt I The following is a summary of the changes in long-tens debt for the year ended June 30, 1998: iJ Balance Balance July 1, June 30, 6a 1997 Additions Deletions 1998 Arbitrage payable $ 180,156 - 180,156 - Compensated absences 2,814,800 250,800 - 3,065,600 Claims and judgments payable 2,308,481 - 876,470 1,432,011 General obligation V bonds 30,000 - 15,000 15,000 Certificates of participation 397,545,000 - 11,305,000 386,240,000 Totals $ 402,878,437 250,800 12,376,626 390,752,611 Arbitrage Payable r The Tax Reform Ad of 1986 ( the Act") substantially revised the treatment to be afforded to the earnings on the proceeds of tax exempt debt, and now requires the Districts to calculate and remit rebatable arbitrage earnings to the Internal Revenue Service. Certain of the Districts' debt and interest earnings on the proceeds thereof 6o are subject to the requirements of the Act. The Districts liability at June 30, 1998 is zero. L Compensated Absences The Districts' policies related to compensated absences are described in Note 1. This liability will be paid in future years from future resources: $3,065,600 6o Claims and Judgments Payable f. . 1997-98 1996-97 4r The Districts are self-insured in a number of areas as described in Note 1: Claims and Judgments payable at July 1 $ 2,308,481 6,197,495 Claims incurred during the fiscal year (498,450) 1,748,478 y Payments on claims during the fiscal year (378,020) (5,637,492) Claims and Judgments payable at June 30 1,432,011 2,308,481 r, Less: current portion 429,603 524,546 Total long-term $ 1,002,408 1,783,935 it y (Continued) 6' 18 V r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 r General Obligation Bonds r 1958 District No. 11 General Obligation Bonds with interest at 1%payable in installments of$15,000 to maturity in January 1999: $15,000 r Less current portion: 15,000 Total long-tern $ r Certificates of Participation r The Districts issue certificates of participation in order to finance their respective share of the construction scheduled at the jointly owned treatment facilities. Each certificate of participation represents a direct and proportionate interest in the semi-annual interest payments. Each district is responsible for its own installment payment and is not obligated for any other Districts' payments. Installment payments for the issues are payable from any source of lawfully available funds of the Districts. All of the Districts'certificates of participation are 25-year issuances except for the 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation which is a 23-year issuance. Certificates of r participation at June 30, 1998 are summarized as follows: 1990-1992 Series A Certificates of Participation $ 88,200,000 r 1990-1992 Series B Certificates of Participation 24,755,000 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation 90,400,000 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation 138,135,000 r 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation 44,750,000 Total certificates of participation 386,240,000 Less: current portion 12,105,000 unamort¢ed discount 1,481.323 .,� Total long-term $372,653,677 1986 Certificates of Participation r On August 13, 1986, District Numbers 1, 2 and 3 completed the sale of$117,000,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments were due February 1 and August 1, beginning February 1, 1987. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1988. r In December 1992, the entire remaining principal balance of the certificates was refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. r 1990.1992 Series A Certificates of Participation On December 5, 1990, all Districts completed the sale of $100,000,000 of certificates of r participation. Interest payments are due monthly beginning January 1991. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The (Continued) 19 r 69 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 i weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998 was 3.2%. Annual principal L' payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1991. All principal and interest payments are to be secured by nine separate irrevocable letters of credit issued by National Westminster Bank The letters of credit will expire on December 15, 2000, unless earlier terminated. The Districts have the option of prepaying certificates in whole or in part at an amount equal to the principal plus accrued interest, if any,without premium. 1990-1992 Series B Certificates of Participation I On May 1, 1991, District Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$117,555,000 of V certificates of participator. Interest payments are due February 1 and August 1 of each year. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998 was 6.21%. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1992. The certificates were issued with an original issue discount of$3,731,496. The trust agreement for the certificates requires a reserve fund which was funded from certificate proceeds. The current reserve requirement of $4,482,958 is being held by Texas Commerce Bank, the trustee (note 2). In addition, Federal Guaranty Insurance Company provides municipal bond insurance for the certificates. On December 3,1992, $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was V refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. On September 1, 1993, $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was y refunded from the proceeds of the September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation rr On September 1, 1992, District Numbers 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$98.500,000 of _ certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly, beginning October 7, 1992. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest V rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998 was 3.3%. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to$9,850,000,which was LW funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by State Street Bank, the trustee(note 2). December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation L On December 3, 1992, District Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5,6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$160,600,000 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due V August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. On October 1, 1992,the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 5.55%and receive a variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of$160,600,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. Ir The 20-year swap agreement matures on August 1,2013. (Continued) V 20 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 r The certificates were issued to refund the remaining outstanding principal balance of the 1986 ,r certificates of participation and $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly,the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts' combined financial statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30, 1998 was $130,150,000. r The trust agreement for the certificates requires a reserve fund which was funded from certificate proceeds. The current reserve requirement of$13,813,498 is being held by State Street Bank, the trustee(note 2). In addition,AMBAC provides municipal bond insurance for the certificates. September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation On September 2, 1993, Districts Numbers 1,2,3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$46,000,000 ,r of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1995. .. On September 1, 1993, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 4.56% and receive a variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of $46,000,000. This interest rate swap agreement is r accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as Interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. The 22-year swap agreement matures on August 1,2016. The certificates were issued to refund $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts' combined financial statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30, r 1998 was approximately$39,740,000. Annual Amortization Requirements The annual requirements to amortize all Districts' debt related to bonds and certificates of `+ participation as of June 30, 1998, including interest payments of$243,943,102, are as follows: General Certificates r Obligation Bonds of Participation Year ending June 30: 1999 $ 15,150 34,597,610 r 2000 - 34,627,746 2001 - 34,738,246 2002 - 34,570,664 2003 - 34,931,404 Thereafter 456,717,382 $ 1J150 6300182,952 'r (Continued) 21 r 66 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Ir Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 L (5) Contributed Equity L The following is a summary of the changes in contributed capital for the years ended June 30, 1986 and 1997, respectively: Lr CspOal corm nm0n. M. raVon j1s1 M1om of tip Ezoess Connelon capita Depreda5an R+cN Puro Fees Replan Ball DstaVlatet PBre .1 i y1.1 a1 Eerm tit nOtIVIWM Data 8t B(,aa8) Ba 30,,1 OI JUN 1.198] (EmenaeEl CNalpes FBGIi4M note 0 lwle a June 30. LW 18B8 DlatrtiNo.i 3 6,2 ', 116.013 (435,585) - 5,03,135 District No.2 51,055.917 4,239,987 (1,116.457) - - 55,108,447 I Dieaid No.3 33.237,858 3.150,289 (1.304.028) - - - 3 .M.213 V DISMd No.5 14,368,019 629,769 (165.2]5) - - - 14,830.503 Divaid No.6 5,asa,329 287,021 (191'2 ) - 5.450.716 D�d No,] 19,14012Rs (25,176) (989,391) (12,038) - - 11I.M.660 l D of No.11 13. 2 .on 1,403.755 (2B4,B3B) - - 14,532.188 Did dNo.13 7.35a,120 697282 (441561) - - O.M.818 yy DMd No.14 85�_]88 ]52.80] (M.81M 15( . 5B.]BO) 6( 5].1081 83,03, Total 8236,36B.V3 t1 4180100 .036 t.5( %.3801 (657.7091 241.153.400 �1 capital caM AmorLL bNbM14 ]Bbon M1om of y IrvMe Eaceaa ConnNrion capeal mem e Depmda0on Ranch Fees ReplaoWa an watt Price Om Over BNenm at EemeO D+cRift, gate 8t B('0te 8) Joao 30,19alance I JUN t,tee6 (F.zpmse0) CMtm Fadtitles (note e) (ndo el June 901BB) y District No 3 4,811,463 3)9,3]3 sm'"1 - - - 6222,M District No 45.0M.030 3,981,525 2,978,362 - 51,985,917 D¢trid No,3 25.014,00] 2,288,/]3 2,934.Tnt - - 33,237.856 1 DistOtlNo.5 12,M.M 1,030,845 322,970 - (22]29) - 14,388M l4sl District No 6 4,850,633 ]4]20 420,476 - - sas4,32B D No 17.314,052 1.021,4]0 M.214 (]5A]3) - - 18,140.263 Distrit3No.11 12.255,012 502.6]4 W.386 - - - 13g23,0]2 District No.13 6,028.M 454.7B4 100,821 7,384,120 District No.14 82y.sal �516 IMIA00 t851.]091 852��3788 44 Total 5214.538.288 B 98]F2 ()S.073I 9108621 (657.709 1 236988223 V (6) Joint Fund Expense Allocation The Districts utilize joint and capital ouday accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, L which are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow. A summary of joint operating costs follows: L (Continued) L 22 L r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 r 1998 1997 r Revenue: Service charges $ 3.554,837 2,652,333 Other 1.158,756 1,02Z770 Total revenue 4,713,593 3,675,103 r Expenses: Salaries and benefits 24,593.619 27,193,724 Supplies 5,538,655 6,430,143 r Contractual 7,030.378 7,776,344 Repairs and maintenance 3,986,898 3,152.171 Utilities 2,893,536 3,073,497 Other 3,882,166 2,979,713 r Total expenses 47,925,150 50,605,692 Net joint operating expenses $43,211,557 46,930,489 (7) Pension Plan The Districts participate in the Orange County Employee's Retirement System ("OCERS"), a cost-sharing multiple-employer, defined benefit pension plan. OCERS was established in 1945 under the provisions of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, and provides members •+ with retirement, death, disability, and cost-0f-living benefits. The payroll of employees covered by OCERS was $27,943,478 for the year ended June 30, 1998, $27,918,636 for the year ended June 30, 1997 and $27,473,413 for the year ended June 30, 1996; the Districts' total payroll was ,r $29,684,325 in 1998, $29,483,892 in 1997 and$29,534,540 in 1996. Benefits All District full-time employees participate in OCERS. Employees who retire at or after age 50 with ten or more years of service are entitled to an annual retirement allowance. The amount of the retirement allowance is based upon the members age at retirement the members "final compen- sation" as defined in Section 31462 of the Retirement Law of 1937, the total years of service under OCERS, and the employees' classification as a Tier I or Tier II member. Benefits fully vest on reaching five years of service. OCERS also provides death and disability benefits. r Contributions Tier I and Tier II covered employees are required to contribute 4.89%- 7.51% and 6.66%-10.23%, respectively, of their annual compensation to OCERS. The Districts are required to make periodic r contnbutions to OCERS in amounts that are estimated to remain a constant percentage of covered employees' compensation such that when combined with covered employees' contributions, will fully provide for all covered employees' benefits by the time they retire. The contribution r requirement for the years ended June 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 were $2,684,493, $2,876,050 and $3,563,022, respectively, which consisted of $1,889,570 from the Districts and $794,923 from employees in 1998, $2,086,966 from the Districts and $790,094 from employees in 1997 and (Continued) 23 r 1 I.r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 L $2,682,558 from the Districts and $880,464 from employees in 1996. The Districts' contributions represented 6.8%, 7.5% and 9.8% of covered payroll and employee contributions represented V 2.8%for both the year ended June 30, 1998 and 1997 and 3.2%for 1996. The Districts' contributions for the years ended June 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 represented 2.9%, 3.2% and 3.9%of total contributions required of all participating entities, respectively. �+ (8)Transactions with Irvine Ranch Water District y District No. 14 - The Districts formed Sanitation District No. 14 as a result of a negotiated Agreement between the Y° Districts and Irvine Ranch Water District("IRWD") as of July 1, 1985. Pursuant to the Agreement, IRWD paid the Districts $34,532,000 for an initial 15,000,000 gallons per day capacity in the Districts' joint treatment facilities (with an ultimate collection capacity of 32,000,000 gallons per day), together with a pro-rata interest in real property based on flow of 32,000,000 gallons per day. The book value of the assets purchased by IRWD was determined to be $14.553,000 as of June 30, 1986. The excess of the purchase price over the assets' book value of$19,979,000 at June 30, 1986 is being amortized over the remaining 30-year useful lives of the joint assets of District No. 14. As of June 30, 1998, $7,892,508 of the excess of purchase price over the assets' book value was amortized. ;y IRWD entered into a separate agreement with District No. 14 whereby IRWD agreed to annually fund payment of District No. 14's proportionate share of the District's joint capital outlay revolving fund budget requirements and certain capital improvements during the Ferro of the agreement, y which contribution amounted to $1,556,380 in 1998 and $3,021,400 in 1997 (see note 5). The contributions are included as contributed equity in the accompanying combined balance sheet District No. 5 "' IRWD has entered into an agreement with District No. 5 to provide funding to District No. 5 for the construction costs of certain wastewater collection, transmission, treatment and disposal facilities to be used by IRWD (the "Downcoast Agreement"). No new funding occurred in 1998 or 1997. The agreement also provides that IRWD would not be required to pay connection fees related to development in the Downcoast Area(as defined in the Downcoast Agreement). L Lr L (Continued) 24 I L r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 r (9)Segment Information r The Districts consist of nine individual Districts that provide sewerage services and are financed primarily through user charges. Key financial data of the individual Districts, in thousands of dollars, are as follows for the years ended June 30, 1998 and 1997: .r 1998 Property Tax Operating Dept.&Amort. Operating Net Net Incr.To Fund Revenues Revenues Expense Inc. Loss Inc. Loss Contrib. Capital r District No. 1 $2,008 5,696 3,138 (2,732) (1,581) (320) District No. 2 9,596 18,232 10,330 (7,346) 4,276 3,123 District No. 3 10,637 18,553 10,128 (5,796) 8,165 1,846 District No. 5 2,661 1,960 1,902 (2,400) 1,335 464 r District No. 6 1,194 3,229 1,250 297 2,"0 96 District No. 7 3,024 4,362 3,850 (5,333) (1,523) (487) District No. 11 2,167 3.517 2,327 (2,181) 782 1,109 ,r District No. 13 742 312 (71) 725 653 District No. 14 22,604 118552 (3289) (1,699) Total $331287 56,291 35,841 (29,416) 11,330 4,785 C.O.P.'s& r Fixed Asset Total Net Working Bonds Total Additions Assets Capital Payable E ui r District No. 1 $ 6,622 93,197 11,964 48208 31,804 District No.2 12,235 385,590 52,817 126.872 251,828 District No.3 17,010 384.084 84,463 120,251 254,918 District No. 5 3,141 87,827 16,447 21,687 64,072 District No.6 295 60,146 21,380 16,395 42,072 District No. 7 11.016 127,931 17.897 26,464 94,403 District No. 11 4.373 91,163 13,639 24,306 60.364 r District No. 13 862 22,516 2,980 300 21,411 District No. 14 (6,857) 72,269 12,819 _ 1,764 67,451 r Total $ 48.697 1,324,723 234,408 386,237 88�323 r r 'r (Continued) 25 r Li COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 L 1 1997 Property Tax Operating Depr. 8 Amort Operating Net Net Incr. To I Fund Revenues Revenues Expense Inc. loss Inc. Loss Contrib. Capital L District No. 1 $1,836 5,956 2,993 (2,509) (2,661) 1,361 District No.2 8,967 20,607 10,220 (6,701) 868 6,913 L District No. 3 9,400 21,215 9,851 (4,349) 5.401 5,224 District No. 5 2,503 2,665 1,859 (1,594) 1,232 1,381 District No. 6 1,071 3,163 1,376 83 1,464 604 District No. 7 2,569 5,127 3,619 (3,905) (827) 1,826 L District No. 11 1,947 3,0D2 2,315 (3,428) (1,340) 1.168 District No. 13 - 789 290 (39) 443 555 1 District No. 14 5 22,103 01561 (2,262) 2,898 W Total $28,193 62,529 3�4626 27,198 22,318 21,830 61 C.O.P.'s 8 Fixed Asset Total Net Wonting Bonds Total Additions Assets 222M Payable Equity IL District No. 1 $ 7.150 89.953 8,585 49,611 33,705 District No.2 14.623 383,132 48,382 130,703 244,429 District No.3 19,377 378,966 75.883 123,655 244,907 District No.5 2,657 86,652 15.331 22,441 62,272 District No. 6 353 58,173 16,668 16,8W 39,536 District No. 7 5,95D 127,366 18,996 27,248 96,341 District No. 11 4,134 87,389 9,967 24,966 58,473 ` District No. 13 980 21,007 2,230 307 20,032 District No. 14 (1,006) j 7,177 1,808 71782 Total $54,236 1,310,619 203,219 397,675 871,477 (10)Other Required Individual Fund Disclosures District 14 has accumulated retained earnings deficits at June 30, 1998 and 1997 of$16.052.791 and $13,421,995, respectively. These deficits are expected to be eliminated by revised service charges in future years. L I (Ca,gnured) iw 26 L r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1998 and 1997 r ,+ (11)Contingencies On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (County) and the Orange County Investment Pools (collectively) filed petitions under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy code. On May 2, 1995, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana Division ("Bankruptcy Court"), approved the settlement entered into by and among the County, the Pool and Pool Participants. r On May 15, 1996, the settlement agreement was amended by the County of Orange Plan of Adjustment was approved by the Bankruptcy Court The Settlement provided for the Districts to r receive "Settlement Secured Claims' against the County. The settlement Secured Claims are secured by a first-priority, secured interest on 65%of net litigation proceeds if and when recovered by the County from third party defendants. The Districts also received "Repayment Claims°. The repayment claims are seared by a second-priority security interest on 65% of litigation recoveries by the County from third party defendants. The Repayment Claims are an "allowed" claim in the County's bankruptcy case under the terms of the Settlement r Under the Chapter 9 Plan of Adjustment filed by the County, any future receipt is contingent on this litigation. A litigation fund has been formed by the pool participants with approximately $50 million available to pursue litigation. The Districts'have recorded $88,340,638 as a noncurtent receivable r on their June 30, 1998 Balance Sheet, which represents the non-recovered principal balance of investments in the Orange County Investment Pool. While collectibility, of the receivable from the County cannot presently be determined, it is the opinion of District Management that the effect of non-payment of the claims would not materially affect the financial position of the Districts. r (12) Due FroMTo Other Districts r Inlerdistrict receivables and payables at June 30, 1996 areas follows: Fund Receivable Payable r District No. 1 $ 839,549 10,737,202 District No. 2 6,767,827 236,503 �+ District No. 3 4,884,960 2,177,264 District No. 5 299,410 1.144,290 District No. 6 4,740.459 990,668 ,r District No. 7 465,623 4,927,992 District No. 11 340,072 4,781.229 District No. 13 148,159 610,902 District No. 14 8,656,590 1,536,599 r Total $27,142,649 27,142,849 r 27 U U U U U (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY SLAW W L' U U U U U U U U U U U 28 U J J J J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS i J J u J J J J . 1J J J l� 29 MUM ISNOTAMON DISTRICIB DP OMN08 COUNTY Ca Who mums sNot hma3a1886 VBN CamdrNMTaWeN2ms J0,1Bm ' DNlrkl D1.111d IRmM oNlrkl DNOM DIM DhVW OMrk1 OW&I No.l tlx3 Ne.3 tla fi DD.@ tlaI xlf lx N9.23 No.14 15W 1�L cx.ml Ywu: CW aM weNpuNelxVs ; 1.255.398 S 597I852 f 8009.]W ! IMeYmeMe . 4_ 5]tR f 20d.0]B f IB)IR ; 1 f 0. f 605913 S 25.20d S . B.4 90 45d5a ]2BBB2bt 1>145] 151 1 511R3 1191613 2450 4670 1Po8R 1461200529 I Wft*e: K t. 05,554 1.491',901 1.137.409 151,644 lu'am 331,681 314,270 41.382 58,231 4,020760 13,8B0.8)1 IGNVM Inleleel 62UWI I,BB 'm 1,)xam 228,840 210,701 SWIM 324,254 a1,782 10,151 5,BBJ.M 2,627,00 OueM1mn pdx dYaW W8.640 41),)10 M49W 2M,410 I,050,832 465,623 308,a01 10.169 T,SW,SW isook"i 10.4m,787 Owhmn Mer9NxMneMY pemM B.W6 3a0R 3a510 3,40 3Yo 7.139 4m1 m6 3,547 M16I 1.680,6W TIIWI NeWae 18B4.9BJ ]00).004 B]B m M.W2 4464.0'Y 13d.t6i 1m 266.111 7,64310 2L80DW RBfiW)d Ime .. 470020 12W.131 TSIR.614 ITMO I0016 440.721 aUaN 00.0M 14839) 43040M UWfiat PMIleltlena ONxnwY 33N M914 02.0f0 12.380 11%) J0.011 213IO IM 10443 ]o).1a) IYIaOp TNNMeill eeeNe 131z2.m 66.992"s Bi.]Y.a00 IBM4.121 21774W4 I5964416 19502 01014N 13.179.781 m5.327.a'lO 2104z2.2i0 NaWIMeSeuals'. C vkm..MOWNWNe 2,Yt,]W la242.3 ) IJ,6W,9W 3.WB.314 1,5M,M2 2,WB.IW 2}Ta,6W W3.B3] 411.723 10.188,W4 B5,J6),841 Mvexm.me z.aW.»0 43,z1x.3W M,]M.xax t0.>M.316 3.1W.Bd ).1M.aW ).132.zBB 6.»3.40) J.3as.2W 1I11W.1Jz 12aI1fM1 n wNaNex AIXMNaN NBN 31.793 199,9M lOD,9M W..081 O.im ]],WT ..Y) 96aBx1 3.764M3 Cpmedbnlew Jl.]W W0,4'O 281,813 m,Wfi 387.WB 71,318 BW.W1 2W,H4 2.001.»6 )d.815 Ow6om oNer denkte a3m,tn 1,m3,CW eW,M) 33.411 - 1,09B,MI 12,134.im 39m,4eD OMlmn Mer BawammxaY e9nntln 159.aW . . . ta 0MI'1.e16 OIM 44 2 82 B9] 2 e Mo= TYal 7129,31 9)101 95045 13BMB3 a)MAN 10lM04 IIOIB ).tl .MO 6021 ] tY R3MAN OwWWII,ewwneM 5644e14 R9.44342o za210226 53a30J4 elm eo9 10491 6aW.375 aRitBto 1299.9se u]m No M.a1Bdo oel. a T&99e ow."I BM.Ms W0132 BO.fiM W.YA 120M5 14901 Mz 4om 200M ]16206) PmpoM.NPnI eM eWkmeM,N mY'. LeM dt,l& 1,7Sa99 1,SBB.010 239,413 1m,BW 1.BBO,2n 1J8,1JJ 46.B3] 1m.8M T,14a8]] 7,211,179 aS...O.wlNNlmlecBXlee 860,430 IWWB,3W ]B,""m 31,WaT92 %mi.im Y,m;.2)2 3a»0,J» 1)7,)T 291152.68 5f9,06y2J1 J1],211,IIB Sewed WalmelIl IRW.e W,07,03 1W,Jo m 165,Ma1To 20,79.83 1&M1,2W 81.6x&o29 05.676.010 6,88,204 11,45 ,I0 B4I.M.012 stm. It sawweallpeel letllnbe e,BM.343 23,9u,OBB x4awAY 3.300,73 3.039.51 8,2046 a6i6,Ot0 21,70 2,7e,78 6t890.at2 et3W.N2 pe 'WplenlaM 4dnINNeIM IMIAIoe 10,4m.311 2],WB,1 M ) 2By82,]85 3,Wa110 J, , B,Wi.HJ SaW.JM 1. 11 5.330.00 W.m),1BI 3,m1,mB LpbyIM YIN plOy969 1ai)0.3W 411)4116 4881flBmfld] B®IW 1b W8]R2 1612R.99d 1311 4"Y1 4.170.602 1W142014 1233W W3 TWIgodOY.pleN xM apulPm^^I 1m,3W,896 34).121,)31 397,631.Mx 70.8B].802 301683.814 130,079,143 84,9611,314 12,442,176 a4,1111,759 1,177,133,438 1,1]D,W],NI UeeemmwlelMaepNlctlm 345m 112613412 1140YBW 192111M 11344518 433MM 20 Y ]IV.212 1357247I 310.2861.m3 NO 432]90 Net gOpMy.plml entl pWpnoM K7W 170 2]1fA9321 mf5n]W2 5IMS1 293N" 0]]J04M W6Y1.3m LWAM 40.609 1 WUB43BM MOOD.W] Eemee p W lew Iwlw awr fiaah wNe m . M 13YW.4B2 120004@ 12i14.M1 O Nrt enYu., mN,l eY eaumNYea emmltrn1.,tIbn 252048 7612W 782.Y0 @1]31 143215 316620 4Sz.611 H1d BBBM 29210O 2311580 T.1.-.e S 93.197.1101 ; ]05INM S VIONIDi S IW.W IN S M115140 S 127,01,212 S 911RIM 1 I&&= 8 72270]T1 a 1324723005 $ 1310918.f]] Soo am ,FoM'q lntlepe snl milWe'me . Icanunuea) r- E _ r- I u- r_ rr - t I t t t t t t t C t t t t t t t t l COUNTY&1xrtRnOx DISTRICTS OF OMxa 0 Comm c.bb np 0e1iv wal(C•nllwee) J.W,I M 'MN C-Foom •T.WISI.Jute W.I897 Ewa! ObWd WOM OIxIN OI•BH OI•Wc1 Moral OIWId DIWIG tl9.1 Iffi.3 KRA Ma.d No B np.2 N" W.R m I 1;@4 1ffiZ cwvm llmlmmsprvvea n•m wm ewxe. a ecauna wr•a• f 5I'm { I,n m f t,0.m { 214" $ llWwu" { Wi,n9 3 aw,t9] i %no f t]B,]01 3 B,bn.2W $ SSs9,n9 emuaJwwneo• M1,BN 1,SY,9n 1,02),67 219,MB 1Sip01 n1,"1 Y•,]•1 80,TJ0 101,W2 8,332213 0.0Yi.n0 ONm 2J! flV B]9 n el Y11 +fB ae ]2 2313 TWlart•MIIMIBb. pa,wifi•rt.. •eeN• IIBM 3143.05) ]924W] 1 W BB1.+n 1n0.R02 BB9.mY 12000 360966 lowl Bw8 13203.911 W aaa II•LIAIlesprv•d•tmm re•bkl•0 Mal.'. ReNmwm wrd• 2212a1 mIBW BW.]W 02156 M.I. %Sn1 187.961 23.410 69.81e 2,457,91 +,W3,m6 Inkntlp•yeBb ]I]670 +,)19,)46 1.53Sm9 2W.152 M376 ZO,@0 141.1% 935 5,494 e,710,20 S.M..Wi Cw*ft. 32,216 173,188 103,153 41,2M 32,293 6$4W 314."1 M4 972.907 1,817,140 tto21,201 gyro uW101sWds 10,)3],203 malot 2.1]]M9 11..20 BWRn 4,527.912 4.781.22B 010.902 +,"65M 21,142,0G9 14.W9216 CYM1..,MaBms p•ye01•. awMwN•n 40.741 133,BN 1Z],54B 18.nB 14,Bm 40,Bn 28,00) I.812 11.259 929,6D3 534,540 Gemrx aMporflnnmOepryanla, aW awal lm - - - - - 15 - I5.000 1s aW Cm b•xwek7.lron PpYedp, rt Tottfl ron 1,6m.0M I,OW.)M 3&I.OM BOBAbb 412A18 B50.9M BM.603 _. S1B0 4•.0W 12.IOB.WO 11.AI.BW aobotas T,"No n,..,I wane uvm re.ma4B w.xe uzW.+ze 6 98T639 a4e1 4m 224e.M9 1Wp.742 eb10,22e B+xi1e] e4e.4n 21411n M{m227 ••'m) leilp.1101111.1 Common...vna--- 333,m B563W B102W 121.100 Im,2W W5.400 is,. O 3W00 W,9W 3.086.800 2s14.000 c norBMIro Wiolspw•e1•. murt•M w01•n 109.003 313,350 2W,6I6 3B,60S 91.m3 100,004 n,bW 11.23) 28.Y03 I,072.409 1,703,935 aeB.vw p•aew - - - - - - - tW,IM G•mnl.ant wY•01•, mnamonl wNm - - - - - - - - - - 15.000 cvntlrcal•sa pturodptlon puree:•. rwwnlam wttiol0bn.x•I vOaunl 46.531.96e 1n.2W.297 ++B.151.704 20.001.3ss 16,n1.008 M.4n,42e 23.sn.01s 20G,34s 1a07.900 37Z0.U.e77 384.e MAN Delmve raeav aTBev ssTW W4Ge mom Telx"4eml HaMW 0.9745W 12961]50] 117M516 M983aW 159••.900 Mu0.490 230116)4 316.e]z 1e144n (M 3BBmme Told u•dini•. 61]n)07 IVM23M t"In.ss4 217SS.tn IR0]0.]n n.W].Bie W.]B].W9 t.+09.3n 49104u 4&401 zaa 439141 M7 Fulq•9unr C•MImuWOwpnx S,Bnlas 351muT 35vu,213 14.MUS b4sq710 t0,an.0W 14.M.109 B,W5010 n,5 .671' 241.10.400 2U.M,273 R•lelnea wmmp.(nau -Wool Bead" 2&m219 19B71043J 2190410 49MI4y MR, ]5)49 0]4 45032M M373600 116.0anil &)1092W n01m.0]) Td•IM.d.,dy 31=351 251WTPd0 359910153 M.071.nt 4a.0723W •IAn.234 SOM424B 21410MB 8)450.BW M9.3z20M Wl 4])IW Total aablxl•... epuity ; 93.IW031 ; 3055802m ; 301U030]] S M11271M S 60.148.149 ; 137.931313 S 91 FWIN 3 n.51$)21 S 72270372 S +324M.M S 1]+O010.17] See•mom 11l&p IMepmMnl o"Moo.'reRM 31 COUN)Y MMTRTION OINRIOTB OF ORRNO6 COUN)Y Cmn050ne81e1emeMMRevenuw,Epeww,eml CM,..in R.MM O ENMnO Far W Yw Entletl Jwe3o,IBN N CwnpanU 7] WlalMYwrEpWJw M.1897 OYMd DftN WOId O"m DIFM M.d. ONM OINMA Oh IIY1 RO.fl tlR..i R9-`3 RLS d4.2 R412 R0.li RB19 IE Im OpRlNprtvanu0l 6ervke Nalpes t 6,B5B,]N i Pwnn ena lmpedlmlaas �j.¢R@ 1B, S 18,5IO,i8 $ 1,95 f ],28 ,,8)1 f4.332.2Wf 3.60%321 ]4.148 S O2,270.407 1n.31 ItfA �774 19 �-211M 1 097 W92 PEB.aR Will ewre1,rtvenuea ISM 14=2e ISM2]60 �9 �,228' ,M 4=34 35172W Tae' IN W.z00.6ffi 6]SRB BOB Opare15Oeapenwe aNerllmn a.Pwnwlwe.mmwlwn: NNnweM BxreFna IOS,aN 1,156NB BS.S,643 Y8,387 82 1 ]N,RIB Ils,w 4,712 12,631 L1N.]0 1.]RB,1% UBIBIaa ,N8 111,08 BB,N WIN I WIN R4,BN N,BN - 57,830 191.513 WO,BBB Bu V. - Ne Sg029 10�WM 150 9.868 N1.33R - 81.)13 176.NB CPnOadwleervkee 1]5,BJB 9N,BBB 180,015 5B.B01 14.101 1N.m Bkm ),R]B wAW3ile 1,180,6a8 2,121.873 05elb".w1 5,1)3 17,N3 R2.85a 9,m 1,161 I,BOB 5,91R 6,)CO 10,1'J] B1,BC8 BB,08 Rrtp.h1ervJ11h 200 1,)1] 3l1T R0 111 07 181 OB NB 8,G5) 'm RBPPIIt ew melMelmm'e 2.628 Nmuo,,4W 30.40 15,031 11 81.53) 0.821 - - 211,M4 N,6N Oftr perelMB OWenee ellPwlbn.nel 9,]0t 1]g96 1R,B2gN6 1.]00.N] I,I51.193 4.]R].OID Z)2371 IIB,B61 1,f3R.143 43,211,02 N.NII,IBB OILer � 850.9 IRflR]3 �� � BB,� 2]]10 �fjj �� 682920 IB 4]B TOMOPenbpwpemw w ruunawle Wn Mem..irm 5290il$ I52"97z 11219519 4e 1544 584181 ]6]1 aN NJ 1250 I OM%47e 544W Opermliqumna llwe)wlme OemedadweOamMUNlan 408.110 2,985.3O6 1,]]2,BN (197,B38) 1,598.BBT (1,4B3Al2) 115,80 210,Bb (1,150,101) 8,420,381 B4ONpR3 OpmcYlkn 4nmmMuletlledl3lw 7R,030 ]],036 70.473 peprxNlkn On MM1erlecRtln 3.130.375 10.329,871 10.428.210 1.M215 1.250.M2 3.)77,)41 2,326,791 311.860 1.948,253 30.111,33) a1.5W,735 pmmlhelw M nceee pumMee mke avw BwkveluawequMC eewle - - 6571 W7 65]]N OwnftlIB MCPTe11NQ S 2]33P2]1 i A344.6661 6 IS)OBUM f MADMIS9 f 296.951 S 16333,4491 S 12.10.16B1 f IHRI61 S 135.54.7431 f f18I15M 16 12710M4 (Comilla) Svo—mpem'Irm manpeneem oWwm'repan. 32 r r-- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- c COUNTY SANITATION OISMM OF OMNOE WUM CanMMn93klmmenl d Rev u.E mws."ORanm M R9 Ep s(CvnlWaal Far 9M Year EMM J.8O,1993 YAM Camp.MNS TOlals M IM You FMaa Juu W.1 W] OI,W ow. Mud mmut o6Vid olwld Oldrid DiOd ola9ld N9.1 tla.] tla3 tlo.3 xa.9 tl9.Z No 11 Na.I3 Na Ia l9� ]ffi Nwlyal Ift..0 Pro Wms. S 2,WSC91 S 9,593166 S 10,037,231 S 2.=.M2 S 1,133,911 3 3.M3.T]6 S 2.16T. 3 S 5 - S 31, .1W S MIW.980 Inbwal 1.691,724 8,2K3M 9pW.619 2,10O,YJO I.M.2O1 I.M. 12 1,O21,725 799p M." 27.M.W9 M..957.509 O9u mm M102 M4M§ 81190 BSBR3 T195M 1^83] 24 M 0'M 212119R Amen TOIaIIIua .h9wwlluas MOM 1R49R7RB wmt 199 = 207,915 6.2J'= 41JR.63O 8131T4 M9.99R 913M1M 51.5]Z369 Nanapxa ,. mwe'. IMalwl 2,669,1% 0,615.052 &0J1,885 I,M,319 ]IX1,A19 1,2M.1W 1,O39,TSO 11,M3 00,910 19,23;169 21.23893S O. 1199R5 9YM] ]O16RR 1d1M 4101 221BM 138996 940 V.Mp 13 594 1497315 TdtlaMq.'slaWq aapampe RB]O 932 6,871.618 93n.16] 11R61] TM.]1O I.m m 1170.TO 9.A1 1O1.BM NMI 22231RW Nd Nwma(Ima) (IMI.]MJ 4,Y2O,O12 &IM,M2 1133O.SSS 2,44B,m6 (1.623,On) ]MASK n6.M M208 ) 11.33O.834 I$05025 Me eapmtlaOx and anion vrWu MSlae 1pwmrMlBa pVlry noa 95T.]9B 1R9Ta5 __. .7AM Nx Mv9aw�aada9w�mdla5we em.IgaleoRanuldea Oe5W1 11,691,]381 4,2M.6R 9.1M,M2 1,395,558 2,13Q108 11.361,030) ]M,958 7251O3J N,8J0.nBl 13,Om.]]9 2.31].00] RalaMM &'.1 (aca�muWM aHw'q, 6a9Fnh901 y15f 270l.MS 192a0M1 311 fifiB R36 0)B]SB6O ]i.1815R0 ]]3U0.81O 4505O R03 12MB.527 113.I2100.51 835.1999jj 632,791.07 Rd eamn9s( r u!Maa Wet), aMdyaer S R9959219 S 1%718433 S 219W.140 S 90,241.4S9 S 388318E S ]6]49574 S *M2,059 S 13.373, S (18952191) S 847.169.2% $ 635AWS71 See wampuryiry ImePonaanl auaAad npoR 33 COUM SFb)RnON Ixf MT11 OF OPANoe COUNW cW tartY BWdbd rdeM.I ws Fat W Teer FNM Jura Wdw just, VMIGnpvSIMTWIe Mtlre Year ErtlM Jxro80.1BB) Wdtl U. peultl ONd" OINM Re6W WNd M.wd qwW tlx.l Ib.E tle3 Ib.S tb.9 (W.Z tl¢11 Ne +5 Ne.to IB_60 1042 GN Bo.eapenWpe Nuee'. NdwshNp MCe4(u100)b/opntlwn f B]x1.110 f !)408161 S 11660b S IIO e16 f )btb f 49:9b] f 6000.Ytl S 614LZl S 133>)bT S 16]65Bt1 S bB10%e CeNBowe RweM. ,sad MmNq xtlNllee: M1gngoryMluee 2004WL B6b.IW tO W)l01 2.8W.66] 11%811 30%776 2167190 313b.1% 9B1%9N Ce f B Aoxe Imm u0Be1 e M relel W finentle0e@N9m: aaado,peand M.peiu end p dpmad Ies22.oM1 I12214.7831 (I7,0e0,12e) RAb.s2s7 Rw,b61 Ilf.bdesl p,])645a1 IW.bll e.6a.es6 (40.10010) ISLttM.WB1 IMucses eelaermane llpWhed (2.6M.1571 R.W2AM1 R.28B.Sb) 11.145.501) (n]AWI It2b.700I (tAdB.Lee) if 1,b21 I16,n71 (M,W>,ebl IMLb.bp pBMpel peymenll m a4]ulu dpWapMm 11.LOx.SOL) P.6]6Aael (3A64.i26) (766.04) (N1.1M) OB].6t01 (batted) 17.I8sf (4a.W0) Iitms.0d 110.b0.00ad FMtlptl prymwbmaeMe (tatted) (Added (15.DD) Ylale0e6omwpYel mnd6ulvne I110 b]I RB]IIDS 1]486) e6L.010 (161]Y11 tl]Y.4b1 080]L Lb 14) It]W 101 65b%e z1 LY tl] Net oeN paAtM(used)br aepxd.ed,easse' .' 9NNIbS 110] 4111 I20.4M1LT IM9371341 LL50210x1 110 .3141 1051M.M7 (5.01]1061 1412610 6 043 INW.]L]I 1%.UOV3 GN Bowe hart.ree.mNSe.: F1owe5e M1em th wlaollnwdmmW 111"m 405]6)A22 513A35.09 Ib.O]0]50 213.I9S.BW 051bbd051 161Abb1 107.134.1L6 167,OX.M I,M,661,47e SNIX0,300 11Nnwlass .ueemt (1121.113,O1,0) 141"W,xbl (WIAe1.0021 (lb.Ob.dM R10.e05 =) 'mosda101 (1W.6'1],bs) 11%bi}VI (1WAI0.0401 (1.165.1W.IXp) (M..26S.Nq Idm02Med 1.147. 4101.1b 9=506 2.301,114 1.e01195 "Min 1.n2A16 M.M ARM 2d.2W.170 20NSN2 Net.'hp .lu.odw.daKl µUNp. IO2]]T 'A'Som 0W.060 15b.1]01 11 b6.1301 1210654 lI ON ease)m1 QMI.M 1260.0b1 52W5.071 le.n Nellm,h (d.uau9)dtl.0 eN epWdeMe (t.010.be) (0.SW26'.0 110.2B5.249) (2.]7L.466) (t.]06.615) (3A)1161) (t.etl.el% (70414)) R54272) 1]0.nz.106) (04,26]) Ce aMw.0e0dredds,""d)ee1 0(IN WJ47012 %44070 ]zw Old 4=1% 03I000 &=a imam 1 908 INIm.95] 744251f0 CeNmgmN pdMede.vMdywr f 6.017118, S Mousse f 2].101.)56 3 A.W.6M S 3. M f 4.9s5.065 f 4A16.516 S 1.I150.M S 1.017.O36 S )1.461090 1 74.Wl.01 S...mpeepgrat.pndedepiwro'ppen. IGeueuee) 34 r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- c r- r- r- r I r I [ L [ [ I I [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ c0uxx UMMAMN MSMM OF OlMf4W=NlT O WnlnBWdwnded DeWFbx (LBnW ) FarlMYem EMBtl lunB30,1 WB NMB CdnpenlNe Tpkle KKlM YurFidM.M1me 30,IBW DIWItl DIYBkI D"W DIBYId D4bk1 DWId M,*t DIWid DbUld ft 1 14a5 wea Hsz 1121E No 3 Ib 14 188E ]em9 CM Me aom ierellR etlirtlia Op�eleghmne lbeB) S (2.i3x,xR)1 $ 0?14.%E1 f (6,)96,948) S (2,IOg159) S 2B8.881 S (s.9A,299) S (2,181,iW) E (I1,210) $ (9.898.)13) f (29p15,721) 3 Ixi.1W,099) FCYWnelMlerem Aoperelbq lnwme IIve1lB mlvN p4'tleetlaY walelMm: Oewedwbn 3,1W,W6 10.929.8I1 10,128,210 1,BW,215 1,20,02 3,8I9,777 2,W6.i82 311,8W 1,W6,239 35,183,371 N.WS.BOB W5.2W W),1M Wi,i08 ONermnaq�dhgrve�wee 258.585 69B,18R 611,835 81,950 8 IN 2xa,630 160,63) (SAB1 05,2W R,1RI,iB'1 1.3MWO OlM1ermnapvdNpmpmu (1W,i81) 19xD,4ID) C11z,6W1 lW.z501 l]IV,WaI 12f1,iW) (19i,%9) (5.9W) (Jll,i11) (1.z35,9531 (1,JW,Wi) tnn�en.e.enenelWDtlu oevewlNwavlin eBVYde rreNBde B]7,I21 2.9W.B9B 2.Bz3.7W 3)2.))) 35x,70 f,OW.OW ]A.171 10.776 1.SOpd12 9.8na11 19.914201 Oeweve(Bavvinnneem wvowim (4.4P1 (6.4151,217) (9,aW.472) (zox) (1.1oe,o99( s,Ws - sae Iz,9BB,rIB) (12,753,IJz) (14,909,31)1 DewvBe(emw)Bl navBYm Ww9wumneNYperrclu ]xB.630 iW.Tp 771.818 15),BBS 117,PAi 1W,815 1i3.%G Y1,1e0 (121,W0) 2,I12,316 2.578.295 De wryveeeBlsldlnr �Nedv IM.WS) (267$13) (RW,WS) (84265) 193.fA6) li).Bxxl (57,570) (x) 101,91E (]21,O80) IW.WDI Devaeae(hvaau)hl NYWmIBB (19,520) (I.zz2) (618) 13.aB9) 19,eW (9F.901) (7,W1) 12.1251 ¢8.235 0.93a (91Q3W) Deoeeu(nwn)nDnpeM nd dndeven ItB,3n1 (W.W1) l4s,to91 IB.oiel Is.iaBl (181 WI (10,on) I1.Wa1 (e,721) (1a9,W7) (R,216) wwaew lBwwl maum van,mldemontreuon DI,WE) Ileo,zJ31 (1Wa29) (za,slt) (6s,6W) (xs.Wi) (4s.Ws) O.wl 190a1 R09.9w) W1.131 Iw.naelemewlnewamle areBle (2a6,97+1 (et0.9as) (BW.Ws) lei.+3a1 (tW.aetl 129a,1W1 InAnl 19o,Wi1 (229,7e5) l2763W01 seW.433 Inveave ltlevewl n ewuee agaves 218,302 (15g80.5) ti1,181 W.015 14,6H (1)0,018) 63,:.RP ZE.389 19,810 299.+78 34G293 Imeaa Iuve9ee)N MentlCnB pryegB i3,IW MUBw(Mauve)el BepoeN +] . 2 .&1 ax RWA ( 124) 7.05 WS) iBIW I89, (1.7I1) (R2W) MOW) xiW) (2.]0) 210 (5,124) Pill) I109115) ( 9,%9)Wien Di aCBYM)IntlYBb aNw Wkn 6,)60,11) 218,521 (WB,673 R1z,19s (881) 3,4W,Wi 3,WR,1W MIN 1 12,i62.213 14,380,218 ImweleBdBwlNdMraeOileNs NO 81x 8]3 W a1 221 159 25 72 2,219 (35,31)) InoeeeBltlwua)N mmvneBlee BplvaB 39,800 19.IW W.1N v,)O] 1t.91p W,e1M1 (91m) ].RW (27,1W) zW,WO 103.90D Iwevelewaa)ndMn NOIYe®nNBpByBdB IW.BWI I2]8.1001 1R10eT 192.2841 1311741 14e 6911 189.951 (Mn1 155713 IB28.IiD1 13WBe141 Nd uW plwlMalueaM W opmetlan f &122,20 f f1N.615) $ 3,165.018 f 110.WB f 758.xW f 2,DW,W7 S 1.OW.Mi 8 511,I27 E p,9)),11437l E f1,7JS,WI E EA10,369 8N e4wna og d pwNMnl udMf raw, 35 L L L L (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) I , W u u u L' u L u L Li 36 u CSDOC Statistical Section hw the Fiscal )ear Ruclecl .luue 30, 1998 C .y U d LJ) CO U N 4j .. N M _ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Expenses by Type (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years $100000 s90,1100 - sal $70,000 $60,000 ss0.o0o S40,000 $W'000 r $20.000 $1a.= _ 1988.89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 199293 199}9 1994 95 1995-M 199 97 1997-98 O Operating Expense ❑Non Operating Expense w Operating(1) Non-Operating Personal Maint& Oepr 8 Interest Total Fiscal Year Services utilities Other Amort Total Ooer Expense Other Non-Over. 1988-89 $ 15,735 $ 5.580 $ 19,810 $ 14,988 $ 56,113 S 3,531 $ 494 $ 4,025 1989-90 19,170 5.578 19,224 17,726 61,698 9,368 1,048 10.416 1990.91 24,170 5,483 20,711 23,520 73,884 9,654 1,822 11,476 _ 1991-92 26,757 5.920 20.416 23,346 76,439 11,825 2,405 14,230 1992-93 28,924 7,235 21.677 27,950 85,786 11,799 1,250 13,049 1993-94 28.886 4,589 21,599 33.988 89.062 16.964 2.414 19.378 _ 1994-95 29.399 3.180 27.369 34.087 94,035 23.941 626 24,767 1995-96 32.660 2.978 26.114 34.001 95,753 20,731 7,648 28,379 1996.97 31.523 3,744 22.851 35,284 93,402 21,237 1,497 22.734 1997-98 28,725 3.328 22.526 35.841 90,420 19,232 1,330 20.562 (1)-The Individual cost components include a breakdown of the joint operating expenses,which,for last six fiscal years .are as follows'. Personal Maint$ Depr& Fiscal Year Services Utilities Other Amort Total Ow ... 1992-93 $ 24,660 $ 6.740 $ 18,923 $ - $ 50,323 1993-94 24,715 4,042 18.870 - 47,627 1994-95 25,861 2,630 22,791 - 51.282 1995-96 27,410 2,392 22,247 - 52,049 1996.97 27,194 3,073 20.339 - 50.606 1997-98 24,594 2,893 20.438 - 47.925 Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division 37 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County r Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years 105 O00 MOOD - 7s.aoo . 80.000 r 45.000 Wood r 15.000 - l. (15.000) 196"9 1999-90 1990-91 199142 1992-93 1093-94 1994-95 1995-96 199s-97 1997-98 r r ■Oyer Revenue ■Non-Oper Revenue ■Contnpute4 Capital Operating Revenue Non Operating Revenue Federal 8 _ Flscal Service Permit& Prop. Cap State Net Contrib. Year Charas Inso Fees, Other Taxes Rlghli Interest Grants Other Capital 1988-89 S 12.775 $ 16.669 S 1,919 S 28,768 S 324 $ 22.091 $ 865 $ 5.238 $ (733) _ 1989-90 23,009 1.241 - 31,122 1.242 18,993 2,070 1,887 94.132 1990-91 39,712 7.429 - 33,395 1,172 17.279 64 3,496 15,683 _ 1991-92 56,155 322 - 34,053 1,815 22,593 2,053 5.499 12,898 1992-93 69,569 456 - 31,054 2,228 27.669 18 1.679 9.486 1993-94 70.908 540 - 35,854 - 33,226 - 6,450 13,471 ` 1994-95 70,292 240 - 27.286 - 18.500 204 2,172 21,431 1995-96 68.328 120 - 29.285 - 20209 - 3,068 4.209 1996-97 62,271 268 - 28,193 - M958 - 2.367 21.830 1997-98 55.962 329 - 31,287 - 27,897 - 2.124 4,785 r Source:County Sanitation Douncts'Accounting Division r 38 r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Property Tax and User Fee Levies and Collections (Dollars in Thousands) r Last Ten Fiscal Years r $t00oo0 r $90.000 ss0000 $70,000 560,000 $50,000 S40,000 ' S30.00D $20,000 r $10,000 $. r 1998.89 1989-90 1990.91 199142 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995�98 199697 1997-98 D Total Tax and User Fes Levy ■Total Tax and User Fee Collection r Current Total Tax % of Total Tax Tax and Percent of and User % of Total O/s Delinquen- and User User Fee Levy Delinquent Fee Collection Delinquen- cies to Tax Fiscal Year Fee Levy Collection Collection Collection Collection to Lew cies Levy 1988-89 $ 34,118 $ 32,816 96.18% $ 942 $ 33,758 98.94 % $ 981 2.88 % 1989-90 47,900 45,024 94.00 729 45,753 95.52 2,532 5.29 1990-91 72,180 68,841 95.37 845 69,686 96.54 2,774 3.84 as1991-92 85.172 79.329 93.14 1,637 80,966 95.06 5,067 5.95 1992-93 92,926 86.511 93.10 2,152 88,663 95.41 5,465 5.88 _ 1993-94 92,728 88.335 95.26 5,722 94,057 101.43 3,255 3.51 1994-95 91.562 86,294 94.25 2,239 88,533 96.69 2,942 3.21 1995-96 91.844 90,479 98.51 586 91,065 99.15 1.710 1.86 r 1996-97 89,794 82,123 91.46 246 82,369 91.73 2.191 2.44 1997-98 90,953 78,861 86.71 12 78,873 86,72 3,039 3.34 r Source: Orange County Auditor-Controller's Office 39 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property (Dollars in Millions) Last Ten Fiscal Years r 140,000 120,000 `. 100,000 i -- 80.000 I 50.000 ._ 40,000 1 20.000 1988.89 1989.90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995-96 19W97 1997.0 0 secured Property Assessed Value 0 Unsecured Property Assessed Value r Secured Property Unsecured Property Totals s. Ratio of Total Assessed Est.Actual Assessed Estimated Assessed Estimated Assessed to Est Fiscal Year Value Value Value Actual Value Value Actual Value Value 1988-89 $ 88,632 $ 88,632 $ 3,464 $ 3.464 $ 92.096 $ 92,096 100% 1989-90 98,750 98.750 4,422 4,422 103,172 103,172 100 V 1990-91 109,048 109,048 3,575 3,575 112.623 112.623 100 1991-92 116,450 116,450 4,473 4,473 120,923 120,923 100 L 1992-93 122,510 122,510 4,687 4,687 127,197 127,197 100 1993-94 124,016 124,016 3,963 3,963 127.979 127,979 100 L 1994-95 123,525 123,525 3,871 3,871 127.396 127,396 100 1995-96 122,524 122,524 3,372 3,372 125,896 126,896 100 VA 1996-97 122,304 122,304 3,247 3,247 125,551 125,551 100 1997-98 126.018 125,018 3,302 3,302 128,320 128,320 100 Source: Orange County Auditor-Controller's Office r r 40 as r r' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Property Tax Rates-Direct and Overlapping Govemments (per$100 of asessed value) r Last Ten Fiscal Years r Fiscal Year 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1291.92 1992.93 1993_94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1996-98 r Basic 1%Levy 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000D 1.00000 1.00000 1.0D000 1=00 1.00000 1.00000 Orange County No.1 Bond AR Fund-1951 0.00121 0.00024 - - - - - - - - r Orange County No.3 Bond MR Fund-1951 0.00210 0.D0039 - - - - - - - - r Orange County No.5 Bond 18R Fund-1951 0.00031 0.00041 - - - - - - - - r Orange County No.6 Bond I&R Fund-1951 - - - - - - - - - - Orange County No.11 r Bond 18R Fund-1951 0.00017 0.00008 - - - - - - - - Sond I&R Fund-1958 0 00051 0.00021 0.00015 0.00012 0.DD013 0.000119 Moil 0.00018 00010 0,000 Q r Total 1.00430 1.00133 1.00015 1.00012 1.00013 1,00019 1=19 1400018 1.00D10 1.00D10 r r r Source: County of Orange Auditor-Controllers Office. r 41 r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Principal Users For the Year Ended June 30, 1998 U AERA EnergyS.Dyeing 8 Finishing 22% Kimberly Clark r 23% 67% Sunda,Brands 23% r Disneyland .24% Ad°hr Farms _ 60% Manna Corps Air Station 24% MCP Foods .31% Favorite Foods Rockwell Semiconductor 32% 39% r Percentages of Service Total Service User Charges Charge Revenues Kimberly Clark $ 401,126 0.67% assAdohr Farms 357,647 0.80% Rockwell Semiconductor 232,842 0.39% Favorite Foods 188,395 0.32% as MCP Foods 182,430 0.31% L Marine Corps Air Station 145,600 0.24% Disneyland 140,117 0.24% k. Sundor Brands 137,606 0.23% U.S. Dyeing & Finishing 134,466 0.23% r AERA Energy 132,666 0.22% r $ 2,052,895 3.45% r Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division 42 as r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Ratio of Annual Debt Service for Bonded Debt to Total Expenses r Last Ten Fiscal Years r 70.0% _. r G00% 50.0% 40.0% r 30.0% r 20.0% 10.0% r U% 1988-09 190390 199 91 1991-92 1992-93 19919 1991-95 M5-96 1996-97 1997.98 r Dollars in Thousands as, Total Operating Expenses Ratio of Debt Service r Total Debt Exclusive of to Total Operating Fiscal Year Principe Interest Service Depr.&Amort Expenses 1988-89 $ 3,002 $ 3,531 $ 6,533 $ 41,125 15.89% ass 1989-90 2.593 9,368 11,961 43,972 27.20 1990-91 2,396 9,654 12,050 50.363 23.93 ass 1991-92 3,335 11,825 15,160 53,091 28.55 1992-93 6,075 11,799 17,874 54,096 33.04 1993-94 11,990 16,964 28,954 50,280 57.59 1994-95 9,670 25,439 35,109 55,298 63.49 r 1995-96 10,180 21,298 31,478 57,561 54.69 1996-97 10,680 20,463 31,143 54,443 57.20 1997-98 11,320 20,008 31,328 49,865 62.83 r Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division r r 43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Computation of Dinner 80 Overlapping Debt June W.1999 a.a f9g]ABAssessal Valuaban(L E lmpmvemena Ony): S117,35].121109(afer CNucbrg S10.962.E3E.T]9 recl v pmenl irnerrnnmal valuation) DIRECTANOOVEft1APPING DEBT(BexO on reeevebprant apjusletl all property asaesxtl valuation W 5123,33].B43,2]0): %Apaiceae Belo 60096 Orange County Te ier Pan Obligations 75.095% S 116,39].250 MCVopollan Water DisNG of Souaem Calllomv 15.089 nw.221 LI trvine Unaee Stlnol Disbia 93.993 3.0E4.495 DErerS Dereem Various M.915 coyorA eim Mon 9,031,171 City a Irvine IN 4.850.000 V 00uacites Verias 1,4E8,341 Orange County SanNabon Det tl No.11 IN. 1g000 OVVe RaiM Water DleVip lmpmvmnem Dlxitla Values 29],T]0.495 Welt DUVirffi 9296E-100. 15,609200 V Omnge Count,Msessmenl Dlslntlb IN. 183.BM. 3 Cie,0 IrviM 1915 Atl Bones 100. 4 .56;oao City or Tustin Isis A Bones 100. 74.610,000 Doer City 1915 Atl EOnis Venous 4g91220e CNy of AruMlm CommurSly FBtlrNes Dieaas I00. 24,3E0,000 V Irvine UnMW School Disrntl Community Facides District No.Ml 99.996 W.5W216 Orange Crony Community FwMbos Donner No,W-4 100. 84,41E,1M Cey of Placenta Community FaciWas Disaa No,MI 100. 2],M0,= DOrer Community Famlibes DebitlS Various 124,741,090 Doer Speazl Distrlob Various 259.651 TOTAL DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT 51,621,BBI.1E2 DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING LEASE OBLIGATION DEBT: %Apaiceae Debt E1301M Orange Came,General Fund ObSgatons 75.095% S W.301,442 Ld Orange Caarty Yenscn ONigatons 75095 240,8M.485 Orange Came,Transit Disbici Aed,o ty 75.095 12,5E],110 Coast Commoner College Ocatl CeNrwas of Partiapeton MAST 17,BM,BM Soua OramJe County Cormnandy Couege DishcA CeNrtrates of Pertapabon %.243 ls,681,W6 Brea Hfi UNnee SUgoIDiSNSICatBr el Panicpa 97755 M.M.014 L Santa Ana Undllal School D¢ CgESoas of Partapaton 100. 11,m.m Orange UniSetl Sdppl DisbKi CerGSceas of Pa2tipabon 95.1E7 11,]20,386 Oaa Stlwol Good CeNfrates of PerEOpabon vane 2),BW,6E2 WmCity aArgOtim GBMM Furq Oalgatiore m T35,ST4,SW L City of Coss Men General Furx1 Funtll Coe 1 W. 30,965,000 City a Innee,ngan Beach General Funtl Oa9eEons 99.969 49.M M City ollrvine Geraral FUM OVgaOae 100. ]S,B)0,000 r Soma Ana Fund Furs Dafgation4 100. 151.216. 5 Oder Cie,Gearel Fund Dash!!C Vinous 151,240. M Le, Orange Count'SarNabn Disbim CertiSoales of Paroopaton 1W. 38E2M,oW Irvine Caul Water Di strict CeAlIesd of P.,ripurnon MM4 91,845.16E Orange Carry Water Defternge Conty% arer Famine 99224 1932W,o12 L Down Sp Water DisNtlaOran9e County Water FaolNes DOmoration 12882 53,5Sy,581 Oaer Speaa GROSS Ce PIN mEASE BU t00. 3.7,498,016 TOTAL GROSS OVERLAPPING LEASE O ftrny(8 DEBT E3.110 029,016 Len: Orerge County Tra1NB DLttrictAWgrily(00%xtt-wpportn07 10029.68E City County Water DisOia DcbSsecsIN Pamapation(100%seB wPPONrg) W9832,012 L NWVD0C Mw xlf-wPPaore ragatona 6E4,E32.1E2 M eel Wdp ringFacifflee Cmperation(100%x0supportirg) 53,537,581 DefersRLAPING o0 EOBLI 3,759.E54 TOTAL NET OVERLAPPING LEASE OBLIGATON DEBT 52.1e2.13a 919 I GROSS COMBINED TOTAL DEBT 54.749=.178 (1) V NET COMBINED TOTAL DEBT $3.803.989,081 (1) Extlutlestax and reWnce arNapation rotes,revenue,mortgage revenue eM�allocetian bondsaM rorvboMetl cepal chase oaigaton. Rates W. L IaM 6lmaovemems M Pmcery As Noel Va w Assesseel yw.wn Cumana Duel Debt ($386255,a0) 0.33% 0.31% I Tonal Direct eM Overlapping Tax arm As 5vnem Dea In% WA Inl Gross Canara,M TOW Debt 4.05% 3.05% Net Comanee Tom Deer 324% 3.08% STATE SCHOOL BUILDING AID REPAYABLE AS OF 6y30198: E35292.]8] L I ' Source: Lalifom®Maridpal Blatstin LI 44 L ad County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Bond Coverage r Last Ten Fiscal Years na e.00 ' 7.00 6,00 5.00 am 3.00 am 2.00 00 all 0.00 Dollars in Thousands _ D 1988-89 ■1989-90 D 19 91 01991-92 111 1992-93 D 1993-94 0 1994-95 D 1995.98 0 199 97 D 1997-96 Direct Net Revenue Debt Service Requirements Gross Operating Avail. For Debt ._ Fiscal Year Revenuelll Exoensi l2l Service Principal Interest Total Coveraae(31 1988-89 S 88S49 $ 41.125 S 47.524 $ 3,002 S 3,531 $ 6,533 7.27 .� 1989-90 79,563 43,972 35,591 2,593 9,368 11,961 2.98 1990.91 102.548 50.363 52,185 2.396 9,654 12,050 4.33 sas 1991-92 122,489 53,091 69,398 3,335 11.825 15,160 4.58 1992-93 132.573 54.096 78.477 6.075 11,799 17.874 4.39 ass 1993-94 146,979 50.280 96.699 11.990 16,964 28.954 3.34 1994-95 118,695 55,298 63.397 9,670 25,439 35.109 1.81 1995-96 121,010 57.561 63.449 10,180 21,298 31,478 2.02 1996-97 114,046 54,443 59.603 10,880 20,463 31,143 1.91 1997-98 117,599 49,865 67.734 11,320 20.008 31.328 2.16 (1)-Including non-operating revenues. (2)-Exclusive of depreciation and amortization. (3)-Coverage requirements per the Districts'certificate of participation indenture agreements range from 1.0 to 1.25, The coverage rate has stabilized around 2.0 for the last four years. sas It is the Districts' policy to be in compliance with all bond covenants and the Districts have the ability to raise user fees by a vote of the Board of Directors. r Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division 45 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V Demogrehic Statistics Covering The Entire County of Orange(1) Last Ten Fiscal Years I V (2) (2) (3) Population Median (2) Public School (2) LI Fiscal Estimates Family Median Enrollment Unemployment Year (In Thousands) Income Age (In Thousands) Rate 1988.89 2,280 $49,916 32.8 354 3.1% L 1989-90 2,326 53,000 33.2 368 2.9% 1990.91 2,411 56,380 30A 385 4.8% L 1991-92 2,512 56,346 30A 393 4.8% 1992-93 2,667 54,380 30A 400 6.7% L 1993-94 2,597 54,413 32.6 402 5.8% 1994-95 2,641 55,507 32.9 412 5.5% 1995-96 2,624 57,106 31.9 422 4.2%1996-97 2,632 59,629 32.2 443 3.5% L L 1997-98 2,615 60.000 30.4 458 4.2% L V L Notes and Data Sources, I V (1)- The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County services 471 square miles, or 59%out of the total 799 square miles that make up the boundries of the County of Orange.(2)- Data Source-Demographic Research Unit,California Department of Finance and Center for L Demographic Research, California State University, Fullerton. (3)- Data Source-Orange County Department of Education. L 1 V I V 46 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits r Covering The Entire County of Orange (1) (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years Non. Assessed Residential Residential Property Value(21 Cons .S) Construction(3) Total Bank �+ Fiscal Calendar No.of Constr. Deposits Year Value Year Ve1ue Units value Vslue(31 M r 1988-89 $ 125,682,613 1989 $ 1,707,485 24,056 $ 2.279.615 $ 3,987,000 $ 19,853.278 1989-90 141,941,723 1990 1.472,070 14,849 1.807,324 3,369,394 18,556,165 1990-91 158,342,197 1991 963,972 8,193 1.041,641 2,005,813 19,887,437 r 1991-92 170,151,136 1992 704,135 7.698 1,297,452 2,001,587 , 27,223,764 1992-93 178,534,134 1993 520,214 6,122 1,083,565 1,583,779 22.637,820 1993-94 178,761.413 1994 523.480 7,333 1,338,519 1.861.999 24,925,640 1994-95 17e,974,944 1995 622,189 11,728 1,576,136 2,198,326 24.979,857 1995-96 172,508,373 1998 693.256 9,424 1.467,292 2,180,548 23,044,306 1996-97 177,300,663 1097 742,808 11,281 1,782,930 2,525,536 24,609,517 r 1997-98 182,284,316 1998 1,182,094 14,345 2,333,177 3,516,271 - (4) r r Data Souroes: (1)- The County Sanitaton Districts of Orange County services 471 square miles, or 59% out of the total 799 square miles that make up the boundaries of the County of Orange. (2)- Orange County Auditor-Controller. `r (3)- "The Chapman College Economic 8 Business Review". All amounts shown for 1998 are forecasted. (4)- Data not available at time of publication. r r r 47 r V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Served by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County June 30, 1998 V Citv Population city Population Anaheim 301,200 Los Alamitos 11,850 �+ Brea 35,900 Newport Beach 72,600 Buena Park 74,500 Orange 125,100 Costa Mesa 104,200 Placentia 47,150 L. Cypress 47,950 Santa Ana 311,200 Fountain Valley 55,600 Seal Beach 26,750 Fullerton 125,100 Stanton 33,450 Garden Grove 154,400 Tustin 66,400 Huntington Beach 192,400 Villa Park 6,550 Irvine 133,200 Westminster 84.800 y La Habra 55,100 Yorba Linda 60.300 La Palma 16.000 23 Cities Subtotal 2,141,700 `. Unincorporated 198,300 Total 2,340,000 V V i r v V La V Source: Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. V 48 V "i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Insurance in Force As of June 30, 1998 r Tvpe Insurer Deductible Limit r All-Risk Property Ten Carriers Fire and Flood $25,000 $200 Million per occurrence. r Earthquake Greater of 5%per $40 Million per occurrence. unit or$250,000 r Boiler 8 Machinery Kemper Insurance Group $25,000 to $100 Million per occurrence. $100,000 r Employee Dishonesty/ Faithful Performance Hartford Insurance Co. $5,000 $5 Million per loss. r Errors&Omissions See Employee Dishonesty/ Faithful Performance r 'r General Liability CV Starr&American RE- $100,000 $25 Million per occurrence Ins.Co. Master Course of Construction Encon/Zurich 5%Values $45 Million at Risk per occumence/location r Travel&Accident ITT Hartford -0- Class 13100,000 per person .+ Insurance Co. $500,000 aggregate for any one accident Workers' r Compensation Self Insured r Excess Workers' Compensation Continental Casualty $250.000 $1 Million each accident. Corp.(CNA) Each Accident r r Source: County Sanitation Districts' Risk Management Office. r 49 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Comparison of The Volume of Wastewater Treated With Expenses by Type (Dollars in Thousands) - Last Ten Fiscal Years Millions of Gallons of wastewater Treated Fiscal Per Personal Maim Depr.B Total Interest Total Total Year Dav Services U=1. &Otter Amon. Ooer. amn Other NonAcer expel,... 1988-89 .d28k S 15.735 $ 5.580 $ 19,810 $ 14.988 S 56,113 $ 3,531 5 494 $ 4,025 $ 60,138 - 1989-90 19.170 5.578 19.224 17.726 61,698 9,368 1,048 10,416 72,114 1990-91 24,170 5.483 20,711 23.520 73,984 9,654 1,822 11,476 65,360 1991-92 _ 26,757 5.920 20,416 23.346 7GA39 11,825 2.405 14,230 90,669 vx � 1992-93 28,924 7,235 21,6Tf 27,950 85,786 11,799 1,250 13,019 98,833 1993-94 28,888 4.589 21,599 33,988 89,062 16,964 2.414 19,378 108,440 199495 29,399 3.180 27,369 34.087 94,035 23,941 826 24,767 118,802 1995-96 32,660 2.978 26,114 34,001 95,753 20731 7,648 28,379 124,132 1996-97 31,523 3,744 22,851 35.284 93.402 21,237 1.497 22,734 116,136 1997-98 28,725 3.328 22.526 35.641 90,420 19,232 1.330 20,562 110,982 In 1989.the Districts completed a 30 year master plan which projected wastewater treatment Bows to increase from 275 millions of gallons per day(mgd)in 1990 to 300 mgd in 105 and out to 400 mgd in the year 2020. In order to manage the increase in wastewater flows,the Districts initiated a S1.5 billion 30 year capital expansion plan with projected debt financing costs of S1.2 billion and Mum operating and maintenance costs,excluding depreciation,of S62 million annually. Total expenses have increased$38.9 million,or 53.9 percent since 1989-90 primarily as a result of the expected increases in wastewater flows. Of this increase,depreciation expense represented 46.6 percent and debt service interest represented another 25.4 percent as a result of the capital facilities expansion that has been completed. As depicted from the chart above,actual wastewater treatment flows increased from 264 mgd in 1988-89 to a high of 269 mgd in 1990-91. Flows suddenly dropped to a ten year low of 227 mgd in 1991-92 and have since ratcheted themselves back up to 254 mgd in 1997-98, The sudden drop in 1991-92 influent is allmutable to a combination of factors including. -the slate-wke recession which not only reduced new development in Orange County,but mused a migration of existing commercial and industrial facilities and reductions in hotel occupanaes. -the So.California water drought which lead to conservation measures and changes in water usage habits. The Districts are currently performing a master plan update to ensure that future plant capacity will match more dosely the future needs of the residents of Orange County. Source: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. 50 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Biosolids Produced Last Ten Fiscal Years 50.000 40 000 36000 30,000 w 25,000 20,000 a 1988-89 0 1989-90 0 1990-91 ❑1991-92 01992-93 01993-94 111 199495 01995-96 ■1996-97 ■1997-98 Fiscal Year Tonnage 1988-89 45,164 w 1989-90 48,439 1990-91 44,968 w 1991-92 43,464 1992-93 41,964 w 1993-94 39,650 1994-95 40,228 w 1995-96 38,802 1996-97 39,387 1997-98 42,645 w Source: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 51 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Miscellaneous Statistics June 30, 1998 I LJ DlaWet Organization: 9 dDistrictshrt servicing 23 does,unincorporated tetl areas all three special districts as fogows: I District No.1 District No.3 District No.7 County of Orange County of Orange County of Orange Cities: Cities: Cities: Orange Anaheim Irvine Santa Ana Brea Orange L Tustin Buena Park Sella Ana Special Districts: Cypress Tusfin Costs Mesa Sanitary Fountain Valley Special Districts: L District Futienon Costa Mesa Sanitary Garden Grove District Huntington Beach La Habm L La Palma District No.I I Los Alamitos County of Orange Santa Ana City of Huntington Beady Seal Beach L District No.2 Stanton District No.13 County of Orange Special Districts: County of Orange Cities: Midway City Sanitary Cities: AnaheM District Bma Bma Orange L Fountain Valley District No.6 Yodla Linda Fullerton County of Orange Garden Grove City of Newport Beach La Habra District No.14 L Orange County of Orange Placentia Distinct No.6 Cities: Santa Ana County of Orange Irvine Villa Park Cities: Orange I Yorba Linda Newport Beach Tustin Lrl Special D'utrids: Spacial Districts: Costa Mesa Sanitary Irvine Rani Water District District L Governing Body: 29 member Board of Directors stall: 531 full-time equivalent employees. Yd operational new: July 1,1954 Authority: Calgomia Health s Safety Code Section 4700 at.seq. services: Wastewater wllection,beabnenl,and disposal. V Service Area: 471 square miles L Population Served: 2,340.000 Operations: Total miles of trunk and subtmnk servers-650 miles Number of pumping stations-22 Average Daily Flow-Plant No.1 92 MGD(1) Average Daily Flow-Plant No.2 162 MOD(1) Toml saasa264 MGD(1) L (1)MGD= millions of gallons per day. Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division. L 52 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Finance Department Accounting Division (714) 962.2411 mailing address: — M.t). Kos 8127 Mountain California 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Mountain VullcN, California 92708-7018 I� IY�I Y FINANCIAL & OPERATIONAL REPORT J. aA•; - - - �0 4 V N y A r Tom. ' Of �W CJ�N0 THE ENq, First Quarter ended September 30, 1998 Orange County Sanitation District, California Table of Contents `. Section 1 - Overview........................................................................................................1 Financial Report - Section 2 - Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department..................................................1 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge.......................................................2 Comparison of Expenses by Department .............................................................3 Summary of Expenses by Major Category............................................................4 Summaryof Revenue by Line Item.......................................................................5 Summary of Expenses by Line Item .....................................................................6 Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process......................................................8 Chartof Staffing Trends........................................................................................9 Section 3- Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Graphs by Type and Funding Source..................1 Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Current Year.....................2 .. Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement- Project Life.......................8 Section 4 - Budget Review by Revenue Areas r Summary Budget Reviews-All Revenue Areas...................................................1 RevenueArea No. 1 Budget Review.....................................................................2 Revenue Area No. 2 Budget Review.....................................................................3 Revenue Area No. 3 Budget Review.....................................................................4 Revenue Area No. 5 Budget Review.....................................................................5 Revenue Area No. 6 Budget Review.....................................................................6 Revenue Area No. 7 Budget Review.....................................................................7 Revenue Area No. 11 Budget Review ..................................................................8 Revenue Area No. 13 Budget Review...................................................................9 Revenue Area No. 14 Budget Review.................................................................10 r Section 5 - Self Insurance Funds Budget Reviews Public Liability Fund Budget Review.....................................................................1 Workers' Compensation Budget Review...............................................................2 Operational Report Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plans......................................................1 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report I + Yd 1�1 II 4 L u This Page Left Intentionally Blank. I � V L L u u V L Overview r First Quarter Financial & Operational Report September 30, 1998 The Finance Department is pleased to present the 1998-99 first quarter comprehensive financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial and operational accomplishments of the District with the intent of providing the Directors, staff, and the r general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the District, reporting on the status of all capital projects in progress, and providing detailed analysis on the status of each Division's 1998-99 performance objectives as established in the 1998-99 adopted budget. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. Joint Operating 8 Working Capital Budget Review., At September 30, 1998, 23.12 percent, or $10,449,000 of the 1998-99 revised net joint operating budget of$45.2 million has been expended. This is a net increase in costs of 9.25 percent, or$884,000 from the same period last year. The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 1998 is $449.67 based on flows of 23,236.07 million gallons. This is $36, or 7.4 percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of$485.63 while flows are only 0.1 percent lower than budgeted. Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of September 30, 1998 include: Salaries and Wages - Net Joint Operating Personnel Cost were at 26.48 percent of budget through the first quarter while staffing was 29.25 full time equivalents (FTE's), or 5.3 percent below the total 549 FTE's approved in the 1998-99 budget. r Personnel costs were high in the first quarter due to (1) the distribution of annual bonuses for department heads and managers in the first quarter and (2) the early retirement and associated accrual payoff for ten employees. Cost savings associated with these early retirements will be realized in 1999-00, and thereafter. • Memberships—At the end of the first quarter, Membership expense totaled $59,423, or 42.62 percent of budget. Membership costs are high because a majority of the District's membership cost are due in the first quarter. r • Office Expense — Supplies—The first quarter expenses for Office Expense— Supplies are at 40.98 percent of budget as a result of the need for new letterhead, r envelopes, and business cards due to the consolidation of the District and associated change in the District's name. r Section 1 -Page 1 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report �+ i � I , • Notices &Ads— First quarter expense for Notices & Ads was at 48.9 percent or $6,600 of the 1998-99 budget of$13,600 due to the executive search for two Executive management positions. • Training — First quarter 1998-99 expenses of$46,000 are low at 5.4 percent of budget. During this quarter, the training program has gone through restructuring and planning for FY 1998-99. Staff anticipates training expenses to increase in the second and third quarters of 1998-99. • Gasoline, Diesel & Oil — Expenses were high at $75,000, or 36.9 percent in the first quarter of 1998-99, due to the timing of when purchases are made. Maintenance buys grease and oil in bulk, which staff believes will last five to eight months. • Contractual Services—Other—Most of the projects relating to other contractual services are in the planning and request for proposal stages at September 30, 1998. 6' With expenses of$166,000 at only 9.1 percent of the budget, staff expects costs to significantly increase in the second and third quarters of FY 1998-99. L • Professional Services—Audit&Accounting — First quarter expenses of $27,000 are at 63.6 percent due to the timing of the District's annual financial audit which occurs L during the first and second quarters of each year. • Professional Services—Other—First quarter expenses of$96,000 are only at 8.6 L percent. Most projects are only in the planning and request for proposal stages at September 30, 1998. Staff expects costs to significantly increase in the second and third quarters of FY 1998-99. W • Repairs and Maintenance— First quarter expenses for "Materials and Services" totaled $678,000, or 17.4 percent of the $3,899,000 budget. Equipment failures are L somewhat unpredictable and were lower in the first quarter of the year. However, staff expects this account to approximate budget by year-end. Operators and L Maintenance staff are concentrating on predictive or scheduled maintenance in an attempt to reduce failures, and ultimately costs, in the future. II W L Section 1 - Page 2 L Overview Comparison of First Quarter Results with Year- End Actuals (Budget) Last Five Years 5sg r r03.0 4eee5 479.37 4e109 Nis]. 500 4 4&� 4ee.x4 450 4M � I ]50 94-95 WN W97 97-98 98-99 19 Y. Jet Year let Year tat Year let hinual W teed W end W antl aw end OR, Budget As highlighted in the graph shown above, the cost per million gallons at the end of the first quarter has been somewhat lower than at year-end for each of the last five years. This Fluctuation is due in part to the time it takes to complete various operating activities and when they can actually be recorded within the District accounting records. With the exception of 1997-98, each year is within eight percent of the budgeted cost per million gallons for that year. Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution towards the gallonage charge through the first quarter, as budgeted for 1998-99, and as actually incurred through the first quarter of 1997-98. All three charts are quite similar showing little change between the prior year first quarter actual, current year budget and prior year first quarter actual. For more detailed information, Section 2 - Page 2 provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through the first quarter for the last five years, Section 2 — Page 3 provides a comparison of expenses by department for September 30, 1996, 1997, and 1998, Section 2 - Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by major category through September 30, 1998 and 1997, Section 2 - Page 5 provides a Section 1 - Page 3 1998-99 First Quarter Report summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through September 30, 1998, and 1997, Section 2 — Page 6 and 7 provides a summary of expenses by line item through September 30, 1998 and 1997, Section 2 - Page 8 is new for this report and provides a summary of expenses by treatment process through September 30, 1998, and 1997; Section 2 - Page 9 provides staffing trends over the last five years including total authorized, actual staffing positions filled, and vacant staffing positions. a. Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review: seo,000,000 r' s7o,000,000 $901000,0a0 $50.000,000 $40,0011,000 1130,000,000 s20,COD,ODD s10,000,000 $o 9130198 Actual Projected 1998-99 Originally Estimated .� Capital Outlay- Capftal Outlay- 1998-99 Capital $8,179,000 $63,663,000 Outlay-$72,186,000 o-a At September 30, 1998, total Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) expenditures se totaled $8,179,100, or 11.3 percent of the original capital outlay estimate for 1998-99, as depicted by the chart above. Costs are low through the first quarter as most projects for 1998-99 are still in the design phase and are expected to approximate budget by ►a year-end. Section 3 — Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical presentation on each District's share of the total amount of joint works capital outlay requirements incurred through September 30. r 1_ Section 1 - Page 4 r Overview For more detailed information, Section 3 - Page 2 through 7 provides a summary of the Joint Works construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section 3— Page 8 through 13 provides a summary of the Joint Works construction requirements of each project over the project life. Budget Review by Revenue Areas:At September 30, 1998, revenues from all Areas totaled $17.0 million, or 12.9 percent of budget. Tax allocations and subvention revenues, budgeted at$30.8 million, are only at 5.9 percent of budget, or $1.8 million, and Other (User) Fees, the largest revenue source of the individual Revenue Areas budgeted at $74.0 million, are only at 2.0 percent of budget, or$1.5 million. Both of these revenue sources are low, because most of the property tax apportionment and user fee receipts that are collected by the County through the property tax roll are not e distributed to the District until after the first quarter of each year. Expenses and outlays of all Revenue Areas totaled $36.4 million, or 23.1 percent of .W budget at September 30, 1998. District Operating and Other Expenditures, budgeted at $9.3 million, are only at 14.3 percent of budget, primarily because of the majority of the line cleaning work to be done is scheduled for the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. ~ District Trunk Sewer Construction costs, budgeted at $22.9 million, are only at 12.7 percent of budget, or $2.9 million, due to the award of fewer than expected construction projects. Self-insurance Budget Reviews: The District is self-insured for Workers' Compensation, and for General Liability claims in excess of$25 million. Separate fund accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred in managing .+ these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual Revenue Area contributions based on flows. Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies. r The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $97,000, or 17.5 percent of budget, while _ total expenses were at $223,000, or 24.8 percent of budget at September 30, 1998. Operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6) r pertains to the status of Performance Objectives as of September 30, 1998. Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the District and r incorporated into the 1998-99 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured, achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to r r Section 1 - Page 5 1998-99 First Quarter Report further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the District's critical goals for 1998-99, workplans were also developed at the divisional level. At September 30, 1998, 86 percent of the Distrid's performance objectives and, 83 L percent of the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end. I ' L' Li i v li L L: L' Swdon 1 -Page 6 - L J.O. & W.C. Budget Review — Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Three I.bnths Ended September J0. 1996 + O&V En9meeag 60"= 0% GSA — 6% Fima Canon Into ap T EA ;mgm. J% Te S. WR 1 2%.6% 2% Departmental Gallonage Charges 199"9 Budget Eng.eenn9 0% O&M w G S A 56% 10% — Finance T% Comm. 1% + Into Tech s% E a Mg mt 3% T.. %wa R . FU 1 — 6% J% Departmental Gallonage Charges - 1997-98 Actual + Enginee6M,.tD M 0% GSA 9% Finance 6% Can. — 1% Into.Teo <% — Ex J% Txh Svcs MIR 14% ]% + Section 2 - Page 1 1998-99 First Quarter Report J Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge For the Three Months Ended September 30, Lot 9130rJa ar3o/ss Maass 913as7 19811.99 w3ase � Actual Actual Antos Actual Annual Budge Aral Flowtn lAlllon Gallons 21.794.23 21,807.71 22.344.81 22.896.85 93,075.00 23.236.07 - General Managers DepaMlent IT47 13.35 12.27 12a5 13.72 9.46 y Canmunira5ors (119 6.11 5.08 5.32 6.35 5.64 _ Hawn Reso ces DepaMiert Hunan Resources 641 4.67 4.49 4.35 4,43 4.05 Safety&Emengers,Respone - 5,58 623 3.55 5.17 2.74 Education&Training 258 5.90 7.25 8.67 3.41 Total 6.41 1283 16.02 15.18 1827 10.23 France DepaMranl Finace Adniroarelicn 14.10 2D.02 18.33 18.42 18.n 13.81 Acco w 4.41 10.14 7.46 10.76 10.88 11.01 Purctssin9&WareMising 3.67 7.38 4.19 5.18 6.88 6.88 V Tnlal 22.18 37.54 29.98 3235 36.52 31.70 General Services Depanmad General Services Administaton 4.74 2.74 6.50 4.15 4.87 426 ; Collation Facilities Mairderance 0.41 0.79 Las 1.84 2.95 3.90 {Ill���llll Fart Facilities Maintenance 33.72 37.73 38.35 33.46 43.65 35.03 Total 38.87 4126 47.84 39.46 51.47 43.19 Informalon Tedadogy Departmest I.T.Adstirmsbation - - - - 271 2.57 u F4M User Support 11.68 247 4,M 7.87 6.27 3.95 Network Support - - - - 8.10 4.42 Progranning&Database - 3.84 8.44 6.85 3.26 2.76 Rant Automatics 1256 0.77 3.25 525 3.22 V Total 11.as 18.67 14.00 17.97 25.59 16.93 Operations&Maintenance Department _ Opus&Meinlera ce Admin - 12AS 12.92 2.32 234 2.10 O&M Process Support - 4.81 3.W 5.24 7.53 4.42 L Plant No.1 Operations - - 75.0 67.00 Saw MM Plats No.2 Operations - - 109.80 8915 9345 96.07 1 Mecir.roai Meintenanee 55.67 49.69 W.63 49.88 47,61 50.83 Dear.&Intr. Maintenance 38.61 41.33 39.14 43.57 49.99 45.56 Central Genevation - - 25.48 31.58 2a73 23.31 Air Quality&encl.Projects - - - 7.73 &80 8.12 Plant Operafiors 18&27 198.55 Trial 28255 307.05 317.12 29147 304.13 3D1.14 Tedmical Se v.Der wannest Teechrical Services Administration (101 6.25 3.95 5,53 7.16 7.03 Environmental Mgmt 117.34 26.69 38,96 27.81 36.10 3228 L.I Environmental Sciences laboratory 32.65 39.29 31,88 29.29 31.97 33.55 Source Control 0.91 0.55 2.96 3.03 3.80 6.43 Total t50.91 72.78 ]5.]6 fi5.66 7&03 81109 En0ineersir Department tan: Engineering Admisstretion 0.13 0.0 0.71 - - 0.02 Planning&Design 0.90 0.91 2.06 0.19 1.00 0.81 j Cora4aetion Maregemmt 0.81 0.44 1.71' 1.11 0.65 0.41 l Total 1.84 1.88 4.54 1.31) 1.66 1.24 Total Joint Operating E)pmses 51210 511.67 M 21 481.66 53&73 499.59 L.Revenues (47.76) (43.43) (W.12) (63,95) (51.10) (49.92) Not Joint Operating Expenses 84.34 668.24 487,09 417,71 485.63 40.67 Section 2 -Page 2 IV L.I J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Comparisons of Expenses by Department For the Three Months Ended September 30, 199&99 9141% 9Ia097 11raiee4 YeartoDate Budget% A l Aral fi sfoin 91:1019e Rmlimtl General Managers Department 274,144 296,624 1276,850 219,871 1722 Communications 113,598 121,648 590,600 131,107 2220 Human Resources Department - Human Resources 100,356 99,854 41Z540 S4,190 2253 Safety&Emergency Response 139,120 81,538 481,350 63.593 1321 r Education&Training 131,747 166,332 8W.600 79A10 923 Total 371223 347,724 1,700,490 237,093 13.94 Finance Department Finance Adntinistration 409,556 375,863 1,748,350 320523 18.35 ~ Accounting 166.754 246,403 1,012,760 255,886 2527 Purchasing&Warehousing 93.650 11801 638,940 159,952 2553 Total 669,960 740.957 3.400,040 736,651 2157 ly General Services Department General Services Administration 145224 95,116 453.370 98,927 2152 Coon Facilities Mairlenaic , 66,757 42.082 274,150 90AW 3353 Plant Facilities Maintenance 856,895 766,053 4,063,030 813,945 20.03 y Total 1,068,877 903251 4,790,550 1,003.332 20.84 lhrio no n Technology Department I.T.Administration 252,590 59,723 23.64 End User Support 107.102 180226 583.800 92,105 15.78 Network Support 753,970 102.791 13M Prograrnng&Database 188,571 156,967 303,= Il 21.16 PlemAuromation 172M 74.498 480220 74,795 15.32 Total 312,941 411,683 2,381,970 393,622 1653 Operations&Maintenance Department Dins&Maintenance Admin 288,783 63,177 217,375 48.717 22AI O&M Process Support 80,347 119,976 700,425 102,743 14.67 Plant No.1 Operations 1,688,158 1,534,193 6225,110 1,643,542 25.40 Plant No.2 Operations 2,453,754 2,040,972 8,698,190 2=304 25.65 Mechanical Maintenance 1131225 1,027,557 4,431.080 1,181,034 26.65 Elect.&lnstr Maintenance 874,689 997,665 4,652,940 1,058,637 22.75 Central Generation 569270 723.026 2,766,850 541,541 1957 Air Ctuality&Spel.Projects - 177,001 614,030 185,559 3071 y Plarn Operations Total 7AM125 6,673.567 28,306,000 6.91 24.72 Technical Services Department Technical Services Administration 68,595 125"9 666,800 182AN 27.30 Environmental Mgmt 825.823 635.652 3,359,900 749,979 2232 Environmental Sciences Laboratory 712250 670AM 2,975250 779,480 2620 Source Control 66,206 69,325 354,000 149,468 4222 rr Total 1,692,874 1503207 7,355,950 1590.931 25.30 Engineering Department Engineering Administration 15543 1 130 413 32154 Planning&Design 45,990 4273 92.920 18,815 2025 Construction Management 39,502 25.390 60,600 9,525 15.72 Total 101.335 29.664 153.650 28.758 18.12 Total Joint Operating Expenses 11.691,078 11,02$525 49,956,100 11,608.462 2324 Less Revenues (807,062) (1,464240) (4,755.100) (1,159,917) 2439 Net Joint Operating Expenses 105S4,016 9,564285 45.200,000 10,448.645 23.12 kd Section 2-Page 3 r , 1998-99 First Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Major Category I For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 v L Revised E"oso 6pense Increase tmmse Aw ent Budget Thou Thou (Decrease) (Deowese) Budget R.Ining 199a-99 9KAW W30197 9 % Reollied Budget Not Salary,Wages B Benefits Z1,918,240 6=.653 5,795,146 537,537 9 26 17.565,587 V Atlmioistni Nu Eapeneee 711,650 198'sm 144,550 54.023 37 28 513,Wl PNMIng 8 Publiw8on 341,700 86,181 81.676 4.505 5.52 2522 255,519 Training 8 Meetings 1,073.840 94,598 176.348 (81.760) (46.35) Q61 979242 1 , Operating Expenses 5,371.280 1,261,256 1J18;398 178.860 16.52 33.0 4,110,024 Contractual Services 7,037,350 1.461.445 1.315,413 14 .= 11.10 20.77 5,575,905 Professional Services 1.905,000 233,695 402,395 (168.700) (41.92) 1227 1.671.3115 LI Reseamh 8 Monitoring 2,292.500 471.300 374,991 96.309 25.68 20.56 1,821290 I'I Repairs B Maintenance 3.899.040 877,908 892.509 (214,683) (24.05) 17.39 3221,136 V Joint. 3.744,450 717,765 807,711 (89948) (11.14) 19.17 3.010.868 Other Material,Supplies, I . antl Sevices ;573,720 400,461 418,881 41,]63 9.97 17.69 ;119266 Y► Tote)Joint 0pea6ng Expense 49.956.100 11.808.462 11.028.525 579.937 5.26 M24 W.U7,638 Revenues B O6suts (4,756,100) (1,159,917) (1,464,240) 304,323 (20.78) 24.39 (3,586,163) V Net Joint operating Fapenae 45,200,000 10.448,545 9,564.285 864,260 925 23.12 34751,455 i Gallonage Flow(MG) 93,075.W 23236.0] 22.Mes 339.22 148 24.99 69,639 tart Gallonage Flow(MGD) 255 253 249 3.6S 1.48 ` Gallonage Flow(9's/MG) 465.63 449.67 417.71 3195 7.65 IL Lr1 V 4 L i� Lr I ; Section 2- Page 4 v r J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item r For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 r Revised Revenue Revenue Revenue, Increase Increase gar Budget -99 Thna mN Remaining (Oeerease) (Decrease) Description 1999-99 9/30198 9/30198 Budget 9130M97 $ % Inter Dstria Sever Use 2,175,D00 359,592 16.53 1,815,406 739,544 (379,952) (51.38) Wastehauler 400,000 116.279 29.07 283,721 80,629 35,650 44.21 r+ IRWD Sludge Disposal 900,000 177,083 19.68 722,917 296.134 (119,051) (40.20) Soap Sales 20,000 - - 20,DDO -Other Sales 5,000 625 1250 4.375 Z997 (2,372) (79,15) r Rents 8 Leases 100,ODD 90,469 90.47 9.531 70,430 20,039 28.45 Genersl Non-Operating 50,000 13,181 26,36 36,819 112,644 (99.463) (88.30) Verude B Ectwpmer4 350,OOD 74,055 21,16 275,945 12,328 61.727 500.71 Sampling Charges 296,100 124.561 43.54 161,539 50,921 73,640 144.62 paver Sales 470,ODD 204.072 43.42 265,928 98.613 105.459 106.94 r Total Joint OperwUng Revenues 4,756,100 1,159,917 24.39 3,596,183 1,464,240 (3D4,323) (20.78) ti r s r r r d Section 2-Page 5 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Rwis % W Budget Expense Expense Fspaeee Increase Inmeess ewgm rio PA Remaiges Th. (Decrease) (Dec% Deena% 1898d9 9130198 9g0198 Bu�el 9I3019T S % apples,Wagee,&B=B6t Satarres&Wages 37,173,440 8,322,468 26.70 22.850,972 7,587,725 754.743 9.97 1,4 Employee aene8ls: -- Relusmed 2,497.900 493,928 19.77 2003.972 50&131 (12.203) (241) Group lnsurmxm 2,768,700 759,046 27.51 1,999,654 659,025 100,021 1&18 N Union,Rental WAN 15,611 2&89 44,689 14.720 891 6.05 workers Comprnsaean 219,000 54,7W 25.00 164,2W 53.590 1,160 2.17 Unemployment Insurance 392W 3,680 9.39 35,620 3,61DO - l Total Benefit 5,575,100 1,327,016 23.60 4248,084 1,233,466 93,550 7.58 W Salaries,Wages,&Benefit 36,748.540 9.649.484 26.26 27.099,056 8,801,191 848,293 9.64 I_ Salaries&Bon.Aloe. Dimcd Indirect All=-CorrlDist (12,830,300) (3.316,831) 25AS 19.513.469) (3,006.045) (310,786) 10.34 Ille..11l Net Salary,Wages&Minerals 23,918,240 6,332,653 26.48 17,585,587 5,795,146 537,W7 9.28 Matt,Supply,&Services �..� Administrative Expenses - Memberships 139,420 0,423 42.62 79.997 64,990 (5,567) (8.57) Office Exp-Supplies 132,810 54,423 40.98 78.387 28.262 25,161 92.56 W Office Expense-OVW 124,520 28,623 22.99 95,897 29,329 ()OB) (241) Small Compute Mans 242250 45,053 18.61 197,167 18,439 26,644 144.60 Minor Fumihue,Pictures,etc. 72,880 11,020 15.12 61,560 3.530 7,490 21219 Pdrltg 8 Publication V Rapro-N-HwseN=se 248,650 22,128 31.79 147,472 21,155 5,040 14.45 Pmees,&As 89,600 26,648 48.88 46.952 27,171 523 4.45 Nobces&Ads 11,550 2,210 19.13 9.340 7,171 (954) (0.16) I.+ Photo Processing 11,5W 2210 19.13 9.340 3,164 (954) (W.16) Training&Meetings Meetings 234,340 49,088 20.95 185252 45,220 3,668 Training 09,500 45,510 5.42 793,990 131,128 (85,618) (6629) Ill Operating Expenses -- CheniealCoagulats 1.388.130 306,954 M12 1.081,146 204,60C) 102,354 50.04 sulfide Control 1,310.430 298,689 22.79 1.011,741 358,562 (59,673) (16.70) y Oft Comm! 1,744,700 401b32 23.01 1,343,168 345,982 55,550 16.08 Chenirls-CogenereBon Oper. - 2,743 - (2743) - 2,743 - _. Miscellanea.Clearness mess - 976 - (976) - 976 - Gasdine,Oiasel&Oil 2D3,750 75.186 W.90 128,564 26.995 48.191 178.52 V Tads 132,500 M. W 15.59 111.840 16,241 4.419 27.21 SOH,Palms.&JIM supplies 88.570 21,489 24.26 67.081 15,985 5.503 34.43 Lab Chemicals&Supplies 355.400 90,172 25.37 265228 68,905 21,254 30.86 Odor Operating Supplies 147,800 42,825 M.98 104,975 45,122 (2,297) (5.09) L CarBnued: I.-. 4 V Section 2-Page 6 61 I 6w J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line Item For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Revised Experue Srporea Expanse eereas Increase Bu4get Thru r3oass Th main Thv lose$ IOecrease) Deecdptlon 189899 90098 9YJ0198 Budget 9130197 3 % COnenued: CorNxSral S ices ass Solids Removal 4,128.380 1.127,692 27.32 3.000.698 967,974 159.718 16.50 OBner Waste Disposal 489340 42,526 8.68 446,814 83,849 (41,323) (49.28) GnwMskeoping 8 Jan4mial 202,W 3ZO47 15.84 170,333 26,638 5.411 20.31 Outside lab services 111,000 24,159 21.n 86,841 17.604 6.466 36.54 Oxygen Platy Oper 288000 68,684 24.02 217.316 54,500 (15.816) (I&n) Other 1,820,240 166,337 9.14 1.663.903 134,760 31,Sn M.43 Prefeealpnel Serviraa so Legal 400,500 $3.361 20.81 317,139 134,130 (60,769) (37.85) kal l B A fungi 42,BOD 27,087 63.68 15.513 25.010 1,017 3.90 Engineering 353,00D 27.592 7.82 325.409 87.428 (59,837) (6844) China, 1.108.90D 95,666 8.0 1,013,2 154,767 (59,111) (38.19) Research 8 Monitoring EmnromneMal Mennen, 1,63zm 390,960 23.96 1,241,020 341,597 49,353 14.46 Plr Dually MonBonng 25,OOD 320 128 24,650 332B1 (32.971) (W9 ) RosmarN 635,500 80,000 12,59 555500 103 79.897 n.ml).90 ass Repairs 8 Malnfenanee Mafanals B Services 2,M.500 476.811 17.51 2,246.689 643,873 (167,062) (25.95) Svc.MIc.Agreements 1,176.540 201.095 Iles 975,445 248,716 (47,621) (19.15) r tl06ee T For 2ffi,000 45,293 18.03 237.3oe 34,001 11292 I121 O rs For Generebrs 78,000 - - 53,097 - - Naluml Gas 127$000 224,303 19.32 553,89T 2111.90 (501920) (18.50) Power 1273.150 246,015 19.32 1,027,135 281,543 (14,390) ((665) Water 876,700 202,154 20.70 n4,518 2t6,5M (14,390) (6.85) Other Opara6n9 8uppllsa ass OUsala Equip Rental le%= M295 2196 $5,786 M.772 623 2.30 Dnanet EpuiP Rend 275,400 73,746 26.18 201,654 12,931 60,815 470.31 In.'M Premiums 1,460,000 25A387 17.36 120Q614 307.423 (54,037) (17.58) Freight 55,550 14,410 25.48 42,140 17,019 (21609) (15.M) ass Mist.OpaM,Expense 214.100 36,W8 17.07 1n,562 56,546 (22.008) (37.59) AOMD OparaSrg Fees 142,000 54,834 38.62 87.166 - 54,SU - Garnered Manager Continganey M9,400 - - 259,400ass - - - Other Non-Oper Ecpene 57,19D 4,244 7.02 62.946 - 4,244 - Mats,SUP,B Sam. 26960,760 5,W3jT4 19.W 23287,556 5,SKM (33,566) (0.50) C aAlloc4:orf8OMer (2,912900) (387,366) 1330 (2,625,535) (463,381) 76.016 (1640) NMJ.O.48atls.Sep,B Serv. 26,037,850 6,275,809 2026 20,162,051 5233,379 42,430 0.81 ass Tota1J.O.Requirementa 19.9W.100 11,808,462 2324 38,347,638 11.025,526 519.937 6.25 Less:: Revenue (4,756,100) (1,159,917) 24.39 (3.596,183) (1.464,240) 304,323 (20.78) Net J.O.Expenditures 4 .200.000 10,448,545 23.12 34,151.455 9.554285 8842B0 9.25 4r Section 2 - Page 7 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report L Summary of Expenses by Treatment Process For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 L i . Increase Increase V Actual Actual (Decrease) (Decrease) 9130198 9130/97 $ Treatment Process: Preliminary Treatment 949.633 1,004,056 (54,423) (5.42) - Primary Treatment 1.133,234 900,030 233,204 25.91 V Secondary Treatment 865,929 635,386 230,543 36.28 1 Cryogenic Plant(Plant 2) 76,389 107,102 (30,713) (28.68) W Effluent Disposal 164.757 206,961 (42,2D4) (20.39) - Solids Handling 3,236,004 2,854,698 381,306 13.35 6.1 Cogeneration 821.983 1,050,779 (228,796) (21.77) utilities 251,923 239,564 12,359 5.16 61 Electrical Distribution 153.902 215.374 (61,472) (28.54) Miscellaneous Buildings 1,492.399 1.587,959 (95,560) (6.02) Air Quality 419,655 270,195 149.460 55.32 ( - Laboratory 856.879 1,025,741 (168,862) (16.46) W Source Control 1,185,775 930.680 255,095 2T41 V Total Joint Operating Requirements 11,808,462 11,028,625 579,937 5.26 Less Revenues (1,159,917) (1,464,240) 304,323 20.78 J W Net Loint Operating Expenditures 10,448,W 9,564,285 884,260 9.25 r I b I L i . Section 2 - Page 8 u J.O. & W.C. Budget Review Staffing Trends — Full Time Equivalents September 30, 1998 700. 673 666 + 60 70 — 600 560 560 549 I 23 — 29 r 6/000N6 6IM/% 6130197 6/00/96 9/30M ❑Actual ❑Vacant At September 30, 1998, the total head count was 528 employees, or a full time equivalency of 519.75. Section 2- Page 9 1998-99 First Quarter Report L L F. W L W L L L L This Page Left Intentionally Blank. I W i , L. f Lr L yr u L L Section 2-Page 10 V W CORF Review Capital Improvement Program - FY 1998-99 For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Plant 1 $1,424,606 Collection Projects is % SZ914,909 3fi% Plant 2 $1,666,229 21% Equipment nems $545,253 7% Interplant 8 Joint Special Projects Facilities $913.120 $694,969 11% 6% Total Capital Improvement Expenditure-$8,179,085 Revenue Ana 13 $94,059 1% Revenue Revenue n Aa 3 Area 2 $2,420,191 5;553.511 29% 31% Revenue Ana5 Revenue $329,617 Anal 4% $885,795 11% Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Mai6 Area 11 Are.14 Nea 7 $287,904 $504.912 SR7a79 $845,717 4% 7% 3% 10% Total Capital Improvement Funding -$8,179,085 Section 3 - Page 1 1998-99 First Quarter Report Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Current Year I For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 L 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 1 1997-93 Actual Remaining projected V Estm uW Outlay @9MM8 Outlay Outlay Collec0on System improvement projects I - Revenue Area 1 V a Same Ana Trunk Bewati Rehab. 67,000 - 000 67,000 b Frame,Cover and Coating ReheD, 20.rFJ0 20.20,000 20,000 _ Revenue Area 1 Total 87,D30 - 67,000 87,000 1 u Revenue Area 2 a Mode.To Newhope-placenta Sever 46,200 - 48.200 46,200 1 � b Carbon Carryon Dam Sever and Pump M 10D,mo 2,09 W 3 97.9 232.000 Y c SeMa Ana River IMerwptor Rebel - - - - d fir5d Turk Manhole Rehab. 745.500 24.016 721,484 708,300 e "Freeway Widening Project 235 56.100 (3,13M) 59,100 - f Pump Sheen ImPrevaments(10%) 122,850 7,14 115,802 lasso u g Sara Ana River IM.Shut 06 Oate Repl. 460,000 102.930 W,070 450,000 h same Me River her.Reelignmerrl&Prot 50D.000 49,301 450,699 150,000 I Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 20.000 - 20,G00 2Q000 1 m Miscellaneous Projects 80,000 - 80,000 80,000 y Revenue Area 2 Twell 2,130,650 182.388 1,948= 1,710,050 Revenue Area 3 V a Pump Staton Improvements,(14%) 171.990 9,668 la2,122 18,900 b Modi catow to Magnolia Relief Sever 170,500 113.652 55" 170,500 _ c Seal Beach Blvd.Rehab.,3.11R 367,200 31296 353,904 349,000 d Magnolia Trunk Serer Rehab. 2,080,000 16,460 2,053,540 2,050,000 e 1-5 Freeway Widening,337 46.200 42.015 4.185 46,200 f Miller4lclder Trunk Sever,Arancan to HBtsbao 2,589,500 13,673 2575,a27 2.589,500 g Mi9er-Flolder Improv., Impedal Hwy.,338.3 1,452.000 1297,977 154,023 1,452.OD0 In Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 20.000 - 20.000 20,000 1y i Miscellaneous projects 80,000 80,000 80,000 Revenue Area 3 Total 6.977.390 1.496,941 5,48Q449 6,806,100 --- Revenue Area 5 a Pump Banton Improvements,(28%) 343,980 19.736 3242" 37,800 b Beautification of Bay Bddge Pump Salon 73.000 37,192 35.808 55,200 c Newpod Blvd.&PCH Widening 1,098.100 (130.585) 1,7235w 1.098.100 d Relocation of Lido Pump station 2350,900 630.642 1,720,258 2,3501900 a Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Rehabilalaton 62700 - 62,700 62,700 f Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 30,000 - 30.000 30.000 g Mmoelaneous breeds 120,000 120,OD0 120.000 L Revenue Area STotal 4,078.680 556,985 3.521,695 3.764.700 Revenue Area 6 L a Pump Staten lmprovemeMs.(6%) 73,71D 4.2M 69,451 6.100 b Nevport Blvtl.&PCH Widertlrg -M.150 (180.332) 9T5.482 795,150 c Fairview Relief Sewer 2,207,000 47.711 2,15%2M 4115.000 d Watson Avenue 7 Cabbmia SL Sever - 2.296 (L296) 2296 y g Frame,Cover and Cozeril Rehab. 5.000 - 5.000 5,000 In MI6eellaneeee luoleets 20M0 20,000 20,O110 Revenue Area 6 Total 3100.880 (125.096) 3226.956 2,945.546 L I Section 3- Page 2 I V r CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements-Current Year r For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 loss." 1999-99 1998-99 r 1997-98 Actual Remaining prolecmU Estlmated Outlay @ 913019a Outlay, outlay Revenue A.7 a Pump station Impmemems,(33%) 406,405 234.6% 170,706 "'SM we blmpmvemeMs W Main St.P.S.,7-7-1 (28%) 358,610 90.4T7 288.133 358,610 e Omnge Parli Acm Trunk Replacement 1,327,000 75.639 1261.361 1.301 f Sum lower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 134.000 - 134,000 134,000 g Wiese Ave.Pump Station parallel Force - 2,30P 2.302) 2,302 r In Mnsoong Subbunk Seger 500.000 56,491 443.909 500,000 1 Ir sbeet 8 Michell SL Sewer RepMcemerd 330.000 4,078 325,922 250,000 j Gisler Red Hill TIuN Relocation 385,500 398 385,102 5,000 k Wicellaneous Repair of Loral Sewers 574,000 - 574.000 574.000 r I Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 in Mrscellaneous projects 40.000 40.000 40,000 Revenue Area 7 Total 4,064,515 464.084 3.601 3,228.412 r Revenue Area 11 a Pump station Improwherns.(996) 110,565 640D9 46,555 12,150 b GoMmwest SL Sewer Replacement 418.01M 6,095 411,905 290,000 r c Goldevivest SLTmnk Sewer Replacement 304,000 14,285 289,714 300,000 it Wamer Avenue Pump Steel 65.000 645 64.355 85,000 e Hal Interceptor 195,700 lasso 176.816 195,700 f Wamer Avenue Relief sewer 195.000 - 195,000 190,000 g Hurdington Beach Sewor B Abandonment 50,000 4,026 45.972 355,000 In Frame.Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 i Woellanaous Projects 40.O0D 40,000 40,000 Revenue Area 11 Total 1,388,265 107.90 1.280,317 1,457.850 Revenue Arm 13 It, Capacity in Caul Canyon Interceptor 23,OM - 23,OOD 23,ODD r e Capacity in East RichfieM Interceptor 700 - 700 700 f Capacity in Santa Me River Intenxptor 93,400 - 93,400 93.400 g Capacity in South River Irdemeptor 14,500 - 14,5110 14,5W h Capacity in New Taft Interceptor 11,9m 11.9011 11,900 Revenue Area 13 Total 143.500 143,500 143,500 Revenue Arm 14 a ImprownerRs to Main SL P.S.,7-7-1 (72%) 922,120 232,658 8N,462 922.120 r b Frame.Cover and Coating Rehab, 10.000 10,000 i(I'm Revenue Area 14 Total 9=120 232,858 899,482 932,120 r Collinew System OlPToMI 2249OZ980 2,814,908 19,988,072 21,075.278 r r Section 3 - Page 3 1998-99 First Quarter Report Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Current Year 1J For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1995 1998-99 1998.99 1996.99 1 -. 1997.98 ACWal Remaining Projected Estlivatad Outlay @ 9130M Outlay outlry, led RepNmatlon Plant No.1 1.Preliminary Treatrnert I i a.Headi No.2 Control System Upgrade,J 31-3 1,115.000 172,778 942= 1,115.000 V c.Sunflower P.S.On"Replacement,PI62 328.000 - 326.000 325.000 2.Primary Treahnenl a.Pmnary Effluent Pumping Automation 95,000 - 95.000 wow i b.Primary Treabnerd 72 MGD E�am:ton,P1-37 1,000,000 WS23 941.077 900,000 (J c.Prim Clarifiers 3A&5 Rehab. P141 100,000 95,841 4,359 100,000 d.Adv. Primary Pohner Benching PLC Pmgm. 109,500 - 109.500 109,500 3.Secondary Treabnern b.Secondary Treabnenl Expansion to 80 MGD,P1-36-2 200,000 260,933 (WSM) 250,983 c.Drain Modifications at Activated sludge Rant,PI-59 110,000 911 lo9.0B9 90,000 4.Solids Handling&Dewatenng b.Automation of Solos Storage Fac P/60 150,000 19.069 130,931 10D.000 S.USfdy Systems laid a.Ere Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mods., P1SIF5 10,000 549,291 (539.291) 549,201 b.Eli Facility Moddns&Safety Upgades,P140-1 700.000 7.106 692,894 250.000 . .. Transfer to Project Below (12,500) - (12,500) - Alarm Baboons for Venting of Gas HoWer 12,5110 735 11,715 12.500 L C.Fac Modihua&Safety Upgrades,P140.2 10.000 8,261 1,T39 10.000 d.Drainage lmprov.Al Plant 1,P14O3 218,000 10.230 207,770 218,000 f.Chemical Faculty Modtfrls,P146-2 1,200,000 16,024 1,184,976 200 U 000 II .. e.CNG Refueling Station.P1-51 433,816 68.831 364.985 433:816 6.ad"Irh r non s a.Selntic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems,N43 218,000 54,065 163,935 218,000 - b.SeisnW Rebofil SbucWel Items,P144 304.000 8.477 295,523 304, 00 p 0 c.Seismic Retrofit of Four Sbuuras, P1444 OQ 1,125,000 8.641 1.116,459 S000 'L) 7.Miscellaneous&Support Projects a.landscaping Project for Undevetoped Area 33,000 - 33,000 1.000 b.Replace Nr Conditioning Units @ Warehouse 35,000 - 35,000 35,000 c Repl Six Gat Fred Ceiling Heaters @ Fleet 20,000 - 20,D00 20.000 d.Replace Ten Gas Fired Ceiling Healers @ B 29,000 - 29,000 29,000 e.Waste Side Stream Automation fi0,000 - 60,000 50.000 -' f Nlowence for Planned Small Projects 1,900,OOD 63,298 1,836,702 1,9DO,W0 j Sub-Total -Rectanabon Plant 9.491.316 1,402,164 8,089,152 7,827,040 Y/ TreaNmrrt Plant No.2 1,Preliminary Treabnerd a.Heacworks lmpnovenents@Plant 2,P266 1,000ADg 13.112 986,888 300,000 r b. Improvements to Influent Sampling System,P2-75 3.6,000 - 35,000 35.000 2.Primary Treatment b.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 666,000 192,894 473.106 888,000 ism3.Secondary Treatrnem a O.AF.Thibsenar Surface Sldm.Sup.Rats 65,000 - 65,OOD 0.000 b.Rehab of Secondary FecilNes,P2.74 485.000 - 485,000 50.000 4.Solids Handling&Dewatedng is Comreyor&it Repl.-Solids Storage Loading 75,000 - 75.0110 75.000 b.Dewatering Beb Prase Rebuild 220,000 - 220,000 220.000 d.Rehab of Digesters in Plant 2,P2-39 817," 27,713 789.287 300,000 a T I 000 WPS Feed to Digesters F&G,P2-39-1 110, 22,327 87,673 110,000 I f.Solids Storage Facility at Plant 2,P260 00 1, 0,000 84,128 915.872 850,000 Illwwwlll Ir Section 3 -Page 4 L CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Current Year For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 IM-99 1993-99 1998.99 y 1997-98 Actual Remaining Pmlectd Estimated Outlay glum Outlay Outlay, 5.UBliy Systems a Digester Cas Flare Coned System Upgrade,P2-76 154,000 - 154,000 154.000 y c Mainly Fire Protection,Signs d Water Sys,P2-46 10.000 388.945 (980,945) 398,945 d.Fee 8 Water Sys Modena.F2462 7,000 8,452 (1.452) a.452 a.Elect Fac Modilns 6 Safely Upgraded,P247.1 1,500,000 4g057 1.450.943 1,000,000 1.Chemical and Pled Water Modifiu,P265 10.000 173,168 (103.168) 173.168 y g.AJr Compressors for Rate Air System,F261 240.000 6,139 233.881 100,000 h.Gas Compreewr Redundancy,P2-79 528.000 - 526,OW 300,000 S.Safety Impm iemeMs a Phase II Site a Security Imp..P2.35-5 31,000 3,172 27.828 31.000 y b.Samic Retrofit of NonSbucWre Systems,P2-50 131,000 105.552 22.418 131.000 c Seismic ReeoBt.Structural"a P2-53-2 469,000 13.233 455,767 409.000 d.Rehab Tunnel lighting System,P2-78 279,000 - 279.000 250.000 7.Miscellaneous 8 Support Rojads v,t a.Maidenance Budding,P2.35-38-1 70,000 283,852 (213,852) 283.852 e.Warehouse Building.P265 1.130,000 19,332 1,110,e6e 130.001) c Fac Moddns 8 Safely Upgrades,N47-2 10.000 39.483 (20.483) 30.493 d.Replace Ar Conditioning@Lquid Oxygen Its 21,000 - 21,000 21,000 y e.Replace Air conditioning @Oyer Center 22.000 - 22,000 22,000 I Replace EMaust Fans @ Operations Center IZI00 - 12,100 12.100 g.Replace ELLseon Supply 8 ReWm DuclampA 30.800 - 30.000 30,000 In.Ram 2 Facilities 6rgineenng 1.900AW ISZ28D 1.717,720 1.900,00D y Sub-Total -TeaNreMPlaM2 11.025,100 1,625.80 9,399.231 8.125,000 Inu mpMM and Joint Facilities 1.Ram Automation 8 Compumizabim a.Compulerued Fac Records and Dug.Sys.J-25.1 385,000 28,253 356.747 360,000 It.Sec Treatment Writ 8 rid System Upgrade.}314 300,000 (41.018) 341.018 70.00D c Poser Monitoring and Comml System,J-333 198,00) - 198,000 100.000 d.Plea ReirrventimdAulomation project,J42 2.706.0DD 171,748 2,534,252 2,587.600 r a.CmN.Of ModOus.Door Hwys to Ring Config 210,001) 29,4a5 18D,515 210,000 L Fiber Optic Upgrades 456,500 6.626 449,874 458.500 9.SCADA Administration Sohvare lmprevemenl 150.000 - 150,000 150,000 h.SM Pland 162 Field Fiber Optic Term.JO Fa 229.700 15,239 214,461 229.700 y 2.Safety B Security Improvements a.Area Classifiratons Saa ies,plants 1 6 2,J-35-1 955,000 32.052 922.948 a00.000 b.Confined Space Personnal Retrieval System,J49 113.000 - 113,0DD 113.000 e.Fire Harm 3 Secunty,System Upgrade,1Yr 298,260 12.02 288.186 2082M y 3.Support Fa.1dms a Endcae Open Bay at vrehouse Storage,1201 157,000 - 157,000 157,000 Is.Collection Faulieas Depot.J- I 136.910 - 136,910 135.910 y Transfer te Project Below (2,023) - (2.023) - Chlorine Bldg Meth Equip Demolition,J60 Z023 Z023 - - clnfomuton Technologies Trader Addition,J61 243,000 8.056 234.944 243.000 4,Utility Systems Improvements y, a.FJectricel Paver System Stalms,J-254 439,000 128,913 310.087 439.000 b.Electrical Foaer System Said..J-2S5 97,SDO - 97,500 97,500 c Sunday Power Reliability Modens,J33-1 947,000 80,577 aS6A23 a50.000 d.Cable Trey Improvements,J47 2,500.000 06,934 2.433.068 2.500,000 y e.Impw.To Central Generation Standing Air System.J63 38.000 - 38.1100 33.000 f.Migetion of Cen.Gen.Waste Heat Bidder.J6a 50,000 965 48.035 50,000 g.Gas Mtdng Systems Impninmen6.J68 2DSAD 1,576 208.424 100.OW r y Section 3- Page 5 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Current Year ' For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 fJ 1998-M 1998-99 199&99 1 1997-98 Actual Remalnl,g Projoctod Estimated Outlay Ld 9130198 Outlay Outlay 5.Fl Management&Reliability a.Surge Tower Repaeenent J-34-1 32,000 63,255 (31255) 0,,255 y c.OWell Flow Meta ReplacencM,J-05 W000 - 90,00D 90,000 d.Peak Flwv NaagemaE Pmjafs,J-67 100,000 - 100,000 100.000 6.Msca'arleola Projects a.Ronsion of Standard SpeaficsBons J< 160D00 M'S90 12S31D 170,000 ad b.Erallafion of Tunnels for Structual Integrity,J-55 203,ODD 15.486 197,514 203,000 c.New Grit Augers,J-52 558,000 2.809 SK191 300,ODD d Madders to Emsting Mectarvm System,J C2 143.030 - USOOD 143,DDO i e.Tuaid Flooding hlerate ng System,J 30,000 - 30.000 20,000 6.1 f.Mechanical Seek on High Rate Dgeaer Mix 517,000 17,846 499,164 517,ODD h.Joint FadliSes Eng:rleaing 1,400,ODO lams 1276975 1,400000 - Sub-Total -Interplant&JOInt 14.CX860 769,622 13,28g238 12,787,915 Sub-Total - Major Proieds 34,5598 3,797A55 30.757.621 25,739.956 Special PmJacls - - t.Strategic 8 Mesta Panning V a.InvesSggatiien and Rehab of Ocean Da8al1,J-39 390,00D 37,943 362057 140,00) b.MamxJenart of Peak Hy& Wic Discharge,J-40.1 379.890 (177,5D7) 557,357 270.000 c.DOam Of F.Ctages and Fee Schad,J10.2 94,145 3.915 90.230 15.30D I d Treatment Rene and Disposal Pan,J-40.3 652,000 167,702 484.298 210,600 1-i e CEQA,Public Par6tipation.Jin4 514,000 17,444 496.555 514,000 f.Permit Renewal&Mairderance 50000 654 49,336 SO,OOD S Pant O&M Mamal&S.O.P.Improv.Prcjel 230,000 - 230,000 230,000 2 lydormffibn managerher4&Cmpnde�8on L a.An Quality lntormalion Mg t.Sys. 180,000 2,233 177,767 180,000 b.Autorre on Report Pudisring 12.000 8,468 111.532 120,00D c.ChM Prognemming 230,000 39,136 190.864 230.000 d.Dale Integration 1,4&9,000 257.356 1,231,644 1,489,000 e Docwle!Maagene t 571,WO 83,SU 487,352 571,OM f.Financial Information System(17) 45D000 81,954 364036 4MOM 9.Geographic InfamaDm System 180,000 - 180.ODD 180,000 h. Internet Application DeeawM. 188,240 499 167,741 188.240 L i. Itraret Applieafion Developmard 91800 24.354 67.216 91,61DD j. LLKS.Inpk:meMaEon Phase ll 75,ODD - 75.000 75,000 k. Netwv Backbornellpgmde Caltinuelion 579,040 47,241 531,799 579,040 I.Neevork Test Facility 1WODO - 105.000 1p5,0o0 y m.Source,Control Programming 255,000 M0 137 184.563 25som a Strategic Information Archilecnae(SIA) 240,OD0 (7,475) 247.475 240,00D o.Vocatkda 6luildng Rewiring 221.080 12,702 2DB,376 221,080 p.Warehouse Bar Cade EvauaSon 111.980 - 111,980 111,980 y %Year 20DO Data Change 186oDD 133.759 S2241 186,000 3.Research&Developmerd a Activated Carbon Fu3 Scale EvWualion 60,000 - MOOD 60,= b.BiobicMing Filter Develepmad&Darren rs inuo 1M.500 - 123,500 123.900 61 c-Large Scale Maofdtration Oarwntmtion 55,500 11.950 43.540 56.500 d Mue Optima tlon Strides&Imprwments 210,000 210.000 210.000 a Rimay E1flua4 Fhrabon Large-Scale Test 207,000 1.970 2D5,030 207,000 f.Pmasaes to Achti pass A Biosoffds 117,MC 630 116.370 117,ODO 6.1 r Section 3-Page 6 V la CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Current Year r For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 1998-99 Iasi 1998-99 1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected r FSOmated Outlay @9Oef98 Outlay Outlay 4.util0y Systems a.Can Gan Engine Air 9nisaion Monitning Sys 550,000 10,921 539,079 550,000 b.Can Gen Engine NO%8 VOC Emission Eal 195,000 - 195.000 195,ODD c Komas Direct Steam Injection System 46.000 - 40.000 46.ODD d.Pranl1 82 Heat Imp RC Sextant 240,000 - 240,000 240,000 e.Rant Water Station Valve Upgrade 27.000 - 27.000 27.ODD r f,Upgrade Phone System 40,000 2.694 37,3DS 40,000 S.Process-R¢lelad Special Projects a.H2O2 Dosing Feed Sensor for Influent Trunks 35,000 - 35,000 35,000 b.Pn1lim Concision Amemt Study for Collection 72.1100 - 72,OD0 72,000 r c.Headwo ul,Main Sewer Pump Rehab 160,000 68,356 81,644 150,000 d.Heatlwmks Scmbber Seal Retrofit 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 a.Digestem Erzpa lion Joint Replacement 75,000 - 75.000 75.0110 L KADY Process for Diameter i9Ronnance Impm. 85.80g - 85,800 85.000 r a.Rapt Pri Clarifier;Foul Air W/D Tiarw.Coupli 32.000 - 32,000 32,000 h.Vander Efficiency Improvements 100,000 - 100.000 100.000 I.Bet Precis Automation 175.000 - 175.000 175,000 j.Bed Press Drone Unit Replacement 60.000 - 50,000 50,000 r k P-25ludge Gnnder Replacamen9Rehab 224.000 - 224,000 224.000 I. P-2 Sludge Une Expansion Joint RepVReMb 6D,000 - 60,000 00.000 m.Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 415,000 10,8as 404,315 415,000 n.Suttur Mmuenng for Combusbon 101,0D0 16.097 $4.903 101.000 r o.Upgrado Emission Modeling Testing System 22,0D0 1,380 20,620 22,000 6.Mecolla mous a.Replacement of Plant Process Equipment 80,000 - 801000 $0,000 to Miscellaneous Relmloliy 8 Redund.Projects 50.000 - 50,000 5D,000 Tmnsfer to Projects Below (35) - (35) - Rt2 Anionic PoymerAutomation 35 35 - - c.Small Capital Equipment Replacement Project 80.000 - 80.000 50.000 f.Security System Improvements 257.800 Z464 255.346 257,800 r Sub-Toot-Special Profacb 11,528,535 931,88.6 10,598.850 10,848,440 Water Management Projects a.Gmundwater Replenishment System. J-36 776.000 18,646 756.354 775,00D r b.Water Conservation Cooperative Projects 20 OD0 7,010 192,990 200,000 c.City InfiltratioMnflow Cooperative Projects 100,000 100,000 100,000 Sub-Total-Water Management Projects 1.075,000 25.656 1.049,344 1.075.000 r Equipment Items 2,124,0D0 545,253 1.578,747 2,124,000 Total Treatment 8 Disposal Projects 49282.811 5,300249 43,902,562 42.587.396 Construction in Progress Completed M6=M (WO72) 35.072 r Tom)Collections,Treatment and Disposal Projects 72,185,787 8,178,085 84,006,706 83,882.673 r r ` Section 3- Page 7 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report L Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements-Project Life I For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1990 L Current Total 1 Approved moms year Projected Remaining LI Project Accumulated Projected Coal at Future Budget Coed coat 6130199 Budget collection System lmprovement projects Revenue Area 1 V a Santa Me Trunk Sewer Rehab. 7,491.501) - 67,000 67,000 7,427,500 b Friend.Cover and Coaling Rehab. 20,000 20,000 20,0010 Revenue Area 1 Total 7.514.500 87,0D0 87,000 7,427,500 1 - Revenue Area 2 a Media To Newltape-Racentia Sewer 86200 4,373 46200 50,573 15.627 - - b Carbon Canyon Dam Sewer and Pump St 2,194,000 5,986 =.000 237,986 1.956.014 ) 1 c Sand Ana River Intercepter Relief 16,572,0010 - - - 16AMODD io d Eudid Trunk Manhole Rehab. 1,065,600 41.713 708.300 750.013 315.587 e 1-5 Freeway Widening Project.2-35 140,800 102,093 - 10Z093 38,707 - f Puny station Improvemmtls(10%) 429,300 71.121 13.550 $4,871 3el.629 i g Santa Ana River Intr.Shut lM Gad Repl. 757,000 96.409 460.000 556.409 200.591 fail Ph Santa Arta River bar.Realignment 8 Rot 11.854,000 13.527 150,000 less, 11.700.473 1 Abandonment of yorba Linda Pump golden 200.000 - - - 280.000 j Replacement of Newhope RawnDa Trunk 8.022,000 - - - 602Z000 k Replacement al Cypress Ave.Subtiunk 7,180.000 - - - 7,180,000 IJ I Fiend.Cover and Coa&g Rehab. 20.000 - 20,000 20.000 in Miscellaneous Projects 80,000 84000 80,000 Revenue Area 2 Total 40.670.900 335= 1,710,050 Z045272 46,625,628 I rea Revenue A 3 u a Purr,Stabon Imprwemmrd,(14%) 600,460 99.569 18,900 118,469 481,991 b Modifirabons to Magnolia Relief Sewer 212,300 23.281 170.600 193,781 18,519 V c Seal Beedr Blvd.Rehab.,311R 491 9,388 349,000 358,388 137,812 d Magnolia Trunk Sewer Rehab. 5,327,400 373,621 2,080,OOD Z453,521 Z673,879 e 1-5 Freeway Widening,3-37 67,100 66-84 46,20g 101,764 (34,654) f MillerJidder Trunk Sewer,Artesia to Hillsboro 6,31Z000 345.761 2,589.600 2,935251 3.376,739 L g Miller-Holder lmprov., Imperial Hay.,3.383 6.344,000 2.11 1.462.000 4,254.753 Z079247 h Frame.Cover and Cowing Rehab. 20,000 - 20,000 20,000 - Miscellaneous prolecd 80.000 $0,000 80,000 . Revenue Area 3 Total 19,469,460 3.719.837 8,806.100 10.525,93, 8,933,523 L Revenue Area 5 a Pun,station Improvements,(28%) 1201,760 199137 37,800 236,937 96gB23 b Beautification of Bay&idle Pump station 80,000 1Z366 85,200 77,586 Z414 L c Newport BIM.B PCH Widening 1207,800 230,851 1,090,100 1.328,961 (121.151) d Relocation of Uda Pump 9aden 3.318.700 491,087 Z350,g00 2.841,9117 476,713 e all Canyon Trunk Sewer Rehzbilaoltion Z245,100 - 62.700 6Z700 Z18Z400 i ' 1 Frame.Cover and Coating Rehab. 0000 - 3DODD 30,000 - V l Misceltaneow Projects 720.000 120,000 120,000 Revenue Area 6 Total 8.2(l 933,461 3,764,700 4,698,161 3.505.199 Revenue Area 6 y a Pump station lmpmvemenls.(6%) 257,520 42,673 8,100 50,773 206.747 b Newport Blvd.B PCH Widening 874.480 318.70 795,150 1,113,111 (239.4651 c Fairview Relief Sewer 3,138.300 389,185 Z115,000 Z504,185 634.115 d Wadon Avenue/California St Sewer 2.176,000 83.508 2,296 86,804 Z090,196 Ll e Old'Dishid6Tmnk-Pmallel 1,719,000 - - - 1,719.000 f Dover Drive Parallel" wer 1,893,000 - - - 1,893,00D - - 9 Frame,Cover and combing Rehab. 5,000 - 5,0 5,00 00 D h Mimellardous Projects 20,000 20,000 20,DDD irY Revenue Area 6 Total 10.083,300 834,161 2.945.545 3,779,707 6.303.593 Section 3-Page 8 L L CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Project Life .. For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Current Total r Approved 6/30/98 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected costal Future Budget Coat Cost W0199 Budget r Revenue Area a Pump Station Improvements,(M%) 1,416,360 23,260 44,500 67,760 1.348.600 b Improvements to Main SL P.S.,7-7-1 (28%) 1,086,680 791 368.610 1,157,152 (70,472) c Racquel Hill Pump Baden Abandonment 215,000 - - - 215.000 �r d Covey Lane Pump Si Abandonment 210.00 - - - 210,000 e Orange Park Acne Trunk Repleremem 1,685,200 60,108 1.300,000 1,380,108 325,094 f Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab. 491,000 - 134,000 134,000 357.000 9 College Ave.Pump Slalion Parallel Force 1,8T7.000 60,354 2,302 62,858 1,814,344 r In Armstrong Subbunk Sewer 7.016,000 12.652 500.000 512,682 0.503.338 i 'B'Street&Michell SL gleaner Replacement 395,000 1,811 280.000 261.811 133.189 j Gisler Red Hill Trunk Relcou.n 5.906.000 - 5.000 5.000 5.901,000 k Miscellaneous Repair of Loral Saxers 2,291,000 - 574.000 574,000 1.717.000 r I Frame,Cover and Coating Rehab. 10,000 - 10.000 10,o00 - m Miscellaneous Project, 40.000 40,000 40,000 Revenue Area 7 Total 22639.240 956.735 3,228,412 4,185,147 18,454,093 'r Revenue Area ll a Pump Station Impmvements,(9%) 386,250 6,343 12,150 18,493 W7,787 b Goldemvem SL Sewer Replacement 491,700 181.278 290,000 471,278 20,422 c Goldemem SL Trunk Sewer Replacement 3.920.400 2.384 300,000 302,394 3.618.016 d Warner Avenue Pump station 1.391,000 104,862 65,0m 169.882 1.221.338 a Heil Interceptor 4.072.900 2,336 195,700 199,036 3,874,864 f Warner Avenue Relief Sower 2,053.640 - 1911 190,000 1,663,640 J 9 Harlington Beads Sewer&Abandonment 370,000 294 M5,000 355,294 14,706 h Frame.Cover and Coating Rehab. 10.000 10,000 10,000 i Miscelaneous Projects 140.000 40,000 40,000 100,000 Revenue Area ll Total 12,835,920 297.207 1.457,850 1,755,147 11,080,7`3 r Revenue Area 13 a Capacity in Euciid Interceptor 2.661.600 - - - 2,661,600 n b Capacity in Carbon Canyon Imeeptor 6,845,148 - 23.000 23,000 5.822.148 r c Capacity in Richfield Tmnk WAS - - - %.968 d Capacity In Kellogg Trunk M.862 - - - 23.852 e Capacity in East Richfield Interceptor 44.942 - 700 700 44.242 f Capacity in Somali,Ana River Interceptor 5,884,393 - 93.400 93.400 5.790,993 r g Capacity in Soulb River Interceptor e35,918 - 14.500 14.500 921.416 h Capacity in New Taft Interceptor 298,879 - 11.900 11,900 284,779 i Capacity in Orange Park Acres Sewer 4,225,924 4.225.924 Revenue Ante 13 Total 19.955,424 143,500 143,500 19,811.924 r Revenue Area 1/ a Improvements to Main SL P.S.,7-7-1 (72%) 2,794,320 2,053,393 922.120 2,976.513 (181.193) b Frame,Cover and Combing Rehab. 10.000 10,000 10,000 Revenue Area 14 Total 2.B04,3M 2.053,303 932.120 2,985,513 (181.193) Collection System GIP Total 152.166.424 9,130.105 21.075,278 30.205,384 121.981.040 r r Section 3- Page 9 1998-99 First Quarter Report L Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Project Life For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 f•l currant Total Approved 6730198 Year Projected Remaining L Project Accumulated Projected cost at Future Budget cost Cost mom Budget Reclamation Plant No.1 1.Phu ihhnary Traa Trent V a. HesdworsNo.2 Control System Upgrade,J314i 1,546.000 1.178,570 1.115.000 2.293.570 (747,570) b. Headwor s Rehab/RefeibvinreM 3,ODO.000 - - - 3,000,D00 c.Sunflower P.S.Dhve Replacerren4 P152 325.000 - 328,000 326,000 L 2.Primary Treatment a.Primary lEffluent Pumping Automation 95.010D - 95,000 95,ODO - b.Prirnary Theab ord"MGD E parhwon,Pt-37 62,127,000 307,339 900,000 1,207.339 60.919.881 ' c.Prim Cladflers 3.485 Rehab. P141 1,845,000 1,504,313 1DD,000 1,604,313 240.687 I d.Adv.Primary Polymer Batcting PLC Pmgm. 109,500 - 109,500 109.500 - 60 3.Secondary Treabnent a.Sec Tmm Process RehablRetabishmeM 5.500,000 - - - 5,500,000 b.Secondary Trealment Expansion to SO MGD.P1-36- 40.800,000 38,324,258 250,933 38,555,191 2,214,809 c.Drain ModBations M Activated Sludge Plain,M59 123.000 4,205 90,000 94,205 26,795 bl 4.Solids Handling 8 Dewatedrg a.Digestion 8 Dewaterin9 Rehab/Refurbishment 9,800,000 - - 9.800,000 b.Aummabon of Solids storage Fac. P150 898.000 4.316 100,000 1D3,316 793,684 5.Utility Systems ir✓ a.Fire Protection,Signs and Wator Sys Mods.,P1-38- 2,685.100 2,513.T07 549.291 3.062.998 (377,898) b. Seen.Facility M ilns B Safety Upg2tles,P-40-1 895,000 201,503 250,000 451,583 143.417 Transfer to Project Below (12,500) - - - (12.500) L Alan Beacons for Ventral of Gas Holder 12.500 - 12,500 12,500 - c.Fee Modifts8 Safety Upgrades,P14 2 1,665,000 1.550-98 10,000 1,560,298 104.702 d.Drainage Impmv.At Plant 1.P140-3 220,000 12,7a3 218,000 230,783 (10.783) e. Raid U81ites RehedRefuNbhmend 500.000 - - - 50D,DD0 1..1 f.Chemial Facility Moderns,P146-2 3,498,000 516.443 2D0,00D 716,4I3 2.779,557 e.CNG Refueling Slabon,PI51 1,402,6D9 1.042.931 433,816 1.476.747 (74.138) 6.Safety Improvements a.Seimic Rebuilt of Non-Structure Systems,P143 1.446.000 1206.039 218.00D 1A28,039 19.961 L b.Seismic Rebuff Shudual Items,P144 2.590.000 110.542 WOOD 414.542 2,175,456 c.Seismic RetmSt of Four Structures, P "4 1229.000 2,370,278 500.000 2.870.276 (1,641276) 7.Mealleneous 5 Support Projects a. iardsapinal Project for UMeveloped Area 33.000 - 1.01DO 1,000 32.000 L b. Replaos Air Conditioning Units Q Warehouse 35.00D - 35,000 35,000 - c.Reel Six Gas Fired Ceiling Heaters®Fleet 20.000 - 20,000 20,00D - d. Replace Ten Gas Fired Ceiling Hosiers®B 29.000 - 29,000 n,000 - e.WasteSideStreamAuromaOon 50.000 - 50,000 50,000 I f.Allowance for Planned Snall Projects 41,800,000 681825 1.900,DD0 1,958,625 39.341.375 Imo' Sub-Total •Reclamation Pram 1 184,285,209 50.908228 7.827,040 58,735268 125.629.941 Treatment Plant No.2 1.Preliminary Treatment a. lieadwerks Improvements @ Plant 2,P256 14 70 ,OW 15,191 300.000 315.191 14.392,NO al Replacement of Barsr4een Influent Gatti.P253 - 5.032 - 5.032 (5,032) b. Inprovemerne to Influent sampling System,P2-75 70,000 - 35,000 35,000 WOOD 2.Primary TreaMent a.Pomery Treatment Rehab/Refurbishrrent 9.618,000 - - - 9,618.000 b.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 5,637.000 4,976.&10 696,01DO 5.642.330 (5,330) 3.Secondary Treatnent L a. DAF.Thideener Surface Slum.sup.Rails M,ODO - 85,000 65.000 - b. Rehab of SeaMary Facilities,P2-74 6.841,000 50,00D 50,0DO 6,791,000 L i ' Section 3-Page 10 W _ L CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Project Life For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Current Total r Approved 6/ 0198 year Projected Remaining Pmjed Accumulated Protected Costat Future Budget Coat cost Orem Budget 4.Solids Handling 5 Dewatedng r a.Comeyar Batt Real.-Solids Storage Loading 75,000 - 75.000 75,000 - b.DevretaringSe'tPreesRebuid 825,000 - 220.000 220,000 605,000 c.Digestion 8 Do.atsring Rehab/Refurbishment 7.800.000 - - - 7.800.000 d.Rehab of Digesters at Ram 2.P2-39 21.000.OD0 888,515 300.000 11186.515 19,813.485 a,4 a.TWAS Feed to Digesters F 8 G,1`2a9-1 200,000 84.571 110.000 194.571 5,429 f.Solids Storage FecilHy,M Raid 2,P250 9,993,000 96.901 850.000 946.901 9,046,099 5,Lamy Systems a.Digests,Ges Flare control System Upgrade,P2-76 154,000 - 154.000 150,000 - b.PlainUtilitiesRaheb/Rehubishment 1.000,000 - - - 1.000.000 o.Modify Fine Pmtsceon,Signs 8 Water Sr.P248 3,763,000 3,410294 398.545 3,509239 (46.M) d.Fire 8 Water Sys Modifrn,P246-2 200,000 172,752 8.452 161204 18,798 e.Becd Fee MotlBrs 5 Safety Upgrades,P2.47.1 4,400,000 5OZ446 1,000.000 1.602.448 2,897,554 r C Chemical and Rand Water Modihs,P255 420D,000 4.184,536 173768 4,337.704 (137.704) 9.Air Compressors far Plain Ur System,P251 550,000 1.935 100,000 101.935 455.065 h.Gas Compressor Redundancy,P2-79 W6.000 - 300,000 300.000 228,000 e.Safety ImprowmeMs r a.Phase II Ste 8 Security Imp.,P2-35.5 1.465.632 1,337,385 31.000 1.356.365 87247 b.Salmk greafit of HonStructure Systems,P250 1.511,000 12117,851 131,000 1.426.851 392,149 c.Severe.Retrofit Structural Hems P2532 4,424.000 4,176.OD7 469,000 4A45.007 (221,007) d.Rehab Tunnel Lighting System,P2.78 279.000 - 250.000 250.000 29,000 r 7.Mismlvenesw 8 Support Pmjeds a.Maimenance Building.P2-3 3 8-1 9,358.000 6,7W.854 293,852 7.074.716 2283254 b.Warehouse Building.P265 1,330,000 103.106 130,000 230,106 1,091.a94 c Fac Modifns 8 Safety Upgrades.P247-2 1,630,000 1.468.586 39.453 1,505,069 121,931 r d.Replace Nr conditioning®Uquel Oxygen Re 21,000 - 21.000 21.000 - e.Replace Nr conditioning®Oyer Center 22,000 - 22,000 22.000 f.Replace Edreust Fans®Operations Center 12,100 - 12,100 12.100 - g.Replace F++Men Supply 8 Return Duckwerk 30.ODD - 30.000 30,000 - r h.Plant 2 Facilibes Engineering 41,800,OW 192.736 1.90D,000 2,W2735 39,707.254 Sub-Total -Treabnem Pla,d2 163,007.732 29,668.038 8.125,0110 37.813.036 115.994,694 _ Intendant and Joint Facilites 1. Ram Automation 8 Computerization a.Compubaroad Fac Records and Deg.Sys.J-25-1 4,805,000 725.741 380,000 1,085,741 3.519,259 It.Sec.Traabnerd Meru a Cm System Upgrade,J-314 1,916,000 221,420 70.000 291,420 1,624,580 r c.Power Monitonng and Comml Systems,J-333 4.033.000 - 10D,000 100.00D 3,933,000 d.Ram Reimemion kitomation Project.J42 25,760.000 319.882 2.687.800 2,907,652 22,852.318 e.Codv.Of Modbus+Data Hwys to Ring CmRig 210.000 - 210,000 210.000 - f.Fiber Optic Upgrades 050.000 - 458,500 456.500 203,500 r g.SCADA Administration Sofware lmproyemem 150,= - 150,000 150.000 - h.SW Rent 1&2 Field Fiber Optic Term.Jet Fa 324,700 - 229,700 229.700 95,O00 2.Safety 8 Security Impmvemems a.Area Gassi feaHons Studies.Rams 1 82.J-351 1,000.000 0.810 800.000 553.810 146.190 r b.Confined Space Personnel Re neval System.J49 352,00D - 113,000 113.000 239.000 c.Fire Alarm 8 security System Upgrade,J-67 560,000 156,861 298,250 455.111 104,889 3.Support Famlites a.Endow Open Bay M eiamhouse Storage,J-20.1 175.000 28,031 157,000 185,031 (10,031) b.collection Facilates Depot,J50-1 846.000 - 136,910 136,910 709.090 Transfer to Prided Bela. (136,910) - - - (135.910) Chlorine Bldg Medl Equip DemolNon,J{A 136,910 - - - 196.910 C.lmemation Technologies Trailer Addition,J51 243.000 - 243.000 243,000 - r d.Building RehablRefurbishment 1 G55.000 - - - 1.455,000 Section 3-Page 11 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report L Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements-Project Life I For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 L Currant Total Approved 6130198 Year p bjo Remaining project Accumulated Projected Cestat Future Budget Con Cost 6130199 Budget 4. S Improrements e Electrical Pw System Studks,J-25-0 3.171.000 146,631 439.000 585,831 2,581 L b.Elecbraal Power System SlWies,J-2S5 3,31511,000 - 97,500 97,5110 3,270,500 c Standby Power Reliability Maki J 1 17,206,OW 735.879 650,000 1,395,879 15.620,121 d.Cable Tray Improvements,J47 12,750,000 95,174 2,500,000 2,595.174 10,154,826 e.Impvr.To Central Genermon sterling Air System,J6 136.000 - 33,000 33,000 103,000 ✓✓ t Mitigation of Cen.Gen,Waste Hen Boiler,J64 200.000 - 50,000 50,000 150,000 g.Gas Mixing Systems Imp on ments,J68 497,000 442 100,OW 100.442 396.555 h.Ekmiral Fialbes Rehabdtefuntishment S87OW0 - - - all".0010 5.Flow Management 8 Reliability a.Surge Tower Replacement,l34-1 8,259,106 7,95a617 63,255 8.076.11M 24Z,234 o Fester Outrall Pumping Station Rehab,J-59 13,040,0110 - - - 13.040,000 c Oudell Fiore Meter RaPkoement J66 924,000 - 901000 90,000 834,001) 1 J.Peak Flaw Management Projects,J67 3.640,000 - 100.000 101 3.540.000 6; 6.Miiseellarkeous Projects a.ReYston of Skroned Slraafications,Jib 341,000 36,122 170.O00 206,122 134,878 b.Evaluation or Tunnels for Structural integrity,J-55 236,000 10.700 203,O00 213,700 22,3W c New Grit Augers.J-52 660,000 - 300.000 3W,000 260,000 1 a1 d.Medians to Existing MCUanital System,J62 1,473,WD - 1143,000 143.000 1,330.000 e.Tunnel Flooding Monirering System,J65 180,000 - 20,W0 20.000 160,00D f Mertarroal Seals on High Rare Digester Mu 577,000 - 517,000 517,000 - g.Odor Control Process RehaWReNnbiahmem 1,8W,000 - - - 1,BW,000 L h.Joint FaalNes Engineering 30,800,000 245,904 1,400,O0111 1,645,904 29,154,096 Sub-Total -Inwit am B Joint 148.067.806 10,T30214 12,767.915 23.510,129 124.539,677 1 Sub-Total - MajorProjects 406.130.747 91,326.480 26,739,955 120.085.435 385,084,312 Special Projects 1.strategic 8 Meaner Planning I a.Investigation and Rehab of Ocean Oudall,J-39 1.439,000 759.20t 740,000 699,201 540.399 V b.Mamagement of Peak Hydraulic Datharge,J4e4 2,646,350 2,554,178 Z70,000 2,824,178 (177.828) c Dem..Of Fin Cha ges arxd Few Schad.,J40.2 694,145 678,850 115,301) 694,150 (5) d.Tmatrnanl,pause and Dbolbed Ran,J40.3 1,462,OW 1,251.474 210,8W 1,462,074 e.GEOA,Public Participation,Ji 882AW 162,707 574,000 578,707 5.293) L f.Permit Renewal B Meentenanee 50,000 698,078 50,000 746.078 (696.078) a-Plant 08 M Manual B S.O.P.Improv.project 2W,000 - 230,000 230,000 - 2.INormaEon Management 8 Compueatuation a.Per Quality Intonntian Mgme Sys. 250.000 44,934 180,000 224.934 now L b.Automation Repot Publishing 195,000 - 120,000 120,001) ]S.OW a CMMS Programming 490,000 104,188 230,000 334,188 155,834 d.Data Integration 4,334,001) 285.282 1.489.000 7,754,2M 2579,738 L: a Document Man m ageem BWW,O 37,434 M.000 608.434 191,586 1.Financial lntonatian system(IT) 2,475.000 1,986,157 450,00111 2,436.157 38,843 9 Geographic Information System 874,000 - 180,0110 180,000 694.000 h. Internet Application Development 382,240 39.351 188?40 227,591 164.649 L L Intranet Application Devn 35 opmnt 235,600 ,816 91,600 127.416 108,184 j. LI.MS Implementation Phase,II 505,000 380958 75,000 455958 49.042 k NeNgrk Backbone Upgrade Continuation 1.439.040 491 579.040 1.069.547 369.493 L Network Test Facility 125,000 - 105,000 105,000 20.000 1 - n.Sanme Control Programming 576,OOo 147,745 255,000 4OZ745 173.255 y n.Strategic lnermomm Architechme(MA) 724,000 189.621 240,000 429.621 294,379 o-VoiceJDala Building Rewiring 570,OB0 292,592 221,030 513,672 56.408 p-Warehouse Ber Code Ewaluabon 111,9B0 - 111.950 111111.983 V.Year 2000 Dad Change 500,000 35,709 788.000 221,709 M,291 L Section 3-Page 12 L L CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements-Project Life .. For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 current Total Approved W30M Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected Costat Future Budget Cost Cast 8130N9 Budget 3.Research B Dewgopmmt as a.PcSvaled Carbon Full Scale EwluaSml fiU,OW - 80,000 60,000 - b.SbbiHJingFilterDeelopmem&Demonstration 123,500 - 123,500 123,51XI - C.Large Scale Maofllbation Demonebaeon 98,5W 16,725 65,5W 102,225 (6,726) d.MBsc Opbmzffbm Studlee&tinprowments 4W,000 44,222 210,000 254,222 175,n8 r e.Primary Effluent Relation Largo-Scale Teat 349,W0 195,301 207.000 402.301 (53,301) C Pntcassos to Achieve Clan A Bosolids 127,W0 314 117,W0 117,314 9,656 4.Utimy system, a.Cm Gan Engine Air Emission Monitoring Sys 5a0.000 42,590 550,000 592.590 (32.690) .r It.Cm Gan Engine NOX&WC Emission Eval 195,WO - 195.W0 195,000 - C.KumasDlredSteaminjectionSgstem 4d,W0 - 46,W0 46,000 - d.Plant 1&2 Heat Loop PLC Studies 440,000 8.548 240,000 248.548 191,462 0.Plant water Station vale upgrade 27,000 - 27,000 27,01D0 - ,� f.Upgrade From System 78,0110 230,021 40,000 270.021 (192,021) S.PmwsReleted special Projects a.H2O2 Doshg Feed sevm/or Influent Trunks 40,000 - 35,W0 35,000 5,000 Tnreferto Pmjed Below (39205) - - _ (39.205) r H2O2 Comgnuae MoniterMetreatrnent ANametlon S 39,205 - - - 39.206 b.Prelim Corrosion Asmurd Strldy,for Collection 107,000 - M.000 72,OW W.000 c.Headaarks Mein Sewer Pump Rehab 300,OW - 1 W,000 1 W,OW 150,000 d.Headwores Scrubber Seal Rebufd 10,0W - 10W0 10,1100 - e.cleaners EtyeWm Joint Replacement 75,000 - 76W0 75,000 - f.KADY Process for Digester Performance lmprv. 90.800 - WACO 85.800 5,000 g.Repl Pri dangers Foul Air W/o Tram.Coupli 32,000 - M.000 32.000 - h.Clad8er Efficiency lmproemenb 1.700,000 - 1W.000 1W,000 1,SW,0DD I.Bait Peas Automation 175,000 - 175.000 175,000 - j.Belt Press orW unit ReplaOis end W,000 - 50,000 50,OW k. P-2 Sludge Grinder Replacemenl/Renao M4,000 - 224,W0 224,W0 - I. P-2 Sludge line Elpanslon Joint ReptlRehab BO.WO - 80.1100 60.000 - in.Scrubber Chemical Food System Mod. 655,000 58,476 415,000 473.476 211.524 n.Sulfur Monaomg for Combustion 128,000 3g609 101.000 131.609 Made) o.upgrade Emblem Woofing Testing SyS" 62.000 27,955 22,000 49,955 2.045 6.Miscellaneous r a.Replacement of Plant Pieces,Equipment 1,7KOOO - 80,000 80,000 1,600.000 b.Misadaneous Reliability&Redund.Pmjeds 250,000 18,960 SQOW 68,950 181,040 Transfer to Project$Show (152.888) - - OS2.S89) Energy Deregulation Study 57,268 539 - 539 66,729 r PH 2 Anionic Polymer Automation 95.600 n.692 - n.692 17.908 C.Small Capital Equipment Replacement Project 80,eW - 80,01)0 80.000 - f Security System lmpmvements 784,80l) 130,592 257,800 308,392 398.408 Sub•Total-Spaced proJ4ab 30.924.635 11,065,284 10,648."0 21,713.724 9,210,911 Water Management Pnojecla a.Groundwater Replenishment Bysem, Jd6 121.M.000 641,012 n5,000 1.316.012 120,8011,988 b.Water ComervaUon Cooperative Pmjeds 1,0011,000 - 2W.000 200.000 8W,0W c.City lrfilms"MnBow CoopereWe Projects 205,100,000 100,000 100,0W 205,000.00(1 Sub-Total-Water Management,Projects 328.025.000 541,012 1.075,000 1.616.012 326.405,988 Equipment W 44,124,0010 2.111,181 2.124.000 4.236.161 39,SW.Wg r Total Treatment&Disposal Projects 889,204,382 105,043.937 42.587,395 147,631.332 741.573.050 Construction in Progress Completed at 8130198 - 59,644.199 - 59,64g199 (59,614,1g9) Pnijints To Be Identified in anabolic Plan 526,000.000 526.000.W0 ,r Total Collections.Treatment and Disposal Projects 1.567,370,SD6 173.818.242 63.662.673 237.480,915 1.329,889,891 Section 3-Page 13 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report L L L L L L L L This Page Left Intentionally Blank. L L L L L L L L Section 3- Page 14 La L Budget Review by District All Revenue Areas Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-To Date `+ Budget Date Budget %Expanded REVENUES: Tax Levy(No. 11 Bond Fund Only) 10,000 5,399 4,601 53.99% Tax Allocations/Sulrven5ons(Sham of l%) 30.815.000 1.819,625 28.995,375 5.90% Connection Fees 6.800.000 895,093 5.904.907 13.16% IRWD Fears - - - 0.00/0 ,r Other Fees 73,795,000 1,472,644 72,322,356 2.00% Sale of Capacity Rights 50.000 - 50.000 - Interest&Misc. Receipts 20.648,000 12,364,668 8=.342 59.88% Other - 465,056 (465,056) - r Total Revenues 132,118,000 17.022.475 115.095.525 12.88% _ OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trait.Plant 49.284,000 5254,178 44,019,822 10.68% District Trunk Sewer Construction 22,904,000 2,914,908 19.959,092 12.73% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 30.444.000 16,402,093 14,041,907 53.88% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 45,200,000 10,448,645 34,751,455 23.12% District Operating&Other Expenditures 9219,500 1.325,323 7,953,177 14.29% Total Outlays 157,111,500 36,356,047 120.755,453 23.14% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Treneraf to Balance 7/lItH &Additions Fixed AsNrs Ill CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Uslncts 1-14 Construction in Progress 34,705,356 2.914,908 (25,575,250) 12,045,014 _ Share of Joint Works 150,440,838 5?64,178 - 155,705,014 Sub-Total 185,146.192 8.179,086 (25,575.250) 167,750,028 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EOUIFt Land and Property Rights 2.675.266 - 2,675,266 Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 307.096.988 25,575,250 - 332,672.238 Treatment Facilities 19,922 - - 19,922 Disposal Facilities 101.528 - - 101,528 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 885,732 - - 855,732 Equity in Joint Treatment Fact. 674.856,556 (152,228) - 674,704,328 r Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 116,246 (14.282) 101,964 Sub-Total 985.752,238 25,408.740 - 1,011,160.978 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 1,170.898,430 33,587,826 (25.575,250) 1,178,911,006 Section 4- Page 1 1998-99 First Quarter Report Revenue Area No. 1 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year4o40ate L Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: L Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - - TaxAllocations/Subventicns(Share of i%) 1,976,000 366,411 1,609,689 18.54% Connection Fees 500,000 33,776 466224 0.70% Other Fees 7,764,000 86,376 7,6T,624 1.11% Saleof Capacity Rights - - - - Inkrest&Misc.Receipts 1.041,000 609,319 431,681 58.53% V Other - 50,742 (50.742) - Total Revenues 11,281,000 1.148,024 10.134,376 10.16% OUTLAYS: Share of hint Works Tmn Plats 5,431,DW 574,849 4,856,151 10.58% District Tmnk Sewer Construction 87,000 - 67,000 0.00% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3,958,000 2,080,610 1,8T7,390 52.57% �y Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 6,040,000 1,131,577 3,908,423 22.45% District Operating&Other Expenditures 693,000 108,350 484,650 1827% Tattooutlays 15,109,000 3,695,388 11213,614 25.70% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adkmbmnb Tranaferto Balance 7HI88 &AddBfon; Fixed Assets 9f40198 Construction in Progress - - - - ShereofJointWorks 16,428,139 574,849 - 17,002,988 Sub-Total 16,428.139 574,849 - 17,002,988 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 81,398 - - 81,398 L Collection Linos and Pump SNs. 6,903,000 - - 6,903,000 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 11.593 - - 11,593 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 58241 - - 58241 Equity in Joint Treatment Feel. 73.837297 (15.923) - 73,821,374 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon - - - - V Sub4otsl 80,891,529 (15,923) - 80,875,605 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 97,31OMS 558,926 - 97,878,594 L L Section 4- Page 2 L L Budget Review by District r Revenue Area No. 2 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Operating Budget Review 1997-98 Year-To Remaining Year-TpDate r Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax levy(Bad Fund(s)Only) - - - - TexA9ocaials/SLbventiors(Share of1%) 9,575,OOD 530,890 9,044,110 5.54% r Conaxdicn Fees 2,500,000 251,652 2,248,348 10,07% Olhr Fees 23,913,000 681,490 23,291,510 284% Sale of Capscity,Rights - - - - r Interest&Use.Race]pts 5,958,000 3,8 618 2,355,482 60.47% Other - 136,241 (136,241) - Total Revenues 4ZWB,000 5,202,791 36,803,209 12.39% r OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trent Rarit 14,524,000 1,940,825 12,9W,175 10.61% Dhbkt Trunk Seeer Construction 2,131,ODD 182,368 1,948,612 8.561% ,r COP/Bo d Retimie, antl Interest Expense %3O2,OOD 5,5116,014 4,705,986 54.32% Share dJdd Woks Operating Expenses 14,W000 3=036 11,107,964 2270% Distnd Operating&Other 6yendiWres 2,775,000 393,729 2,381,271 14.19% r Total Outlays 44,10,0D0 10,974.992 33,127,008 24.89% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments TrarMer to Balance 7/119B &Additions Fixed Assets 9/30198 ,r Construction in Progress 831,047 IBZ388 (295,825) 517,610 Store of Jod Works 44,034,032 1,540,825 - 45,574,857 Sub-Total 44,SSS079 1,723,213 (295,825) 46,092.467 r COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Lad and Property Rights 517,04 - - 517,694 Cotiecucn Lines and Pump Stuns. 97,07Q167 295,825 - 97,371,982 Trcetnned Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 33.172 - - 33,172 r General Pad and Admin.Facil. 218,549 - - 218,549 Equity in Joint Trlstmern Fad]. 197,50&072 (44,344) - 197,461,728 Oth r Assets a Cost Less Anon. 14,089 (2,850) - 11,2M r Sub-Total 295.355.733 248,631 - 296,614,354 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 340,030,812 1,971.844 (29S825) 341,706,831 r r r Section 4 - Page 3 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report Revenue Area No. 3 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L' For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-TODa[e Budget Date Budget %Expended L REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond FutM(s)Only) - - - - TaxAllorationsrSubvenlions(Sham of 1%) 10,313,W0 52Q084 9,786,916 5.10% L Connection Fees 1,800,000 204,494 1,595,506 11.30% Other Fees 23,326,000 438,215 22887,785 1.85% Sale of Capacity Rights - - - Interest B Misc.Receipts 6,888,000 4,055,424 2,832,576 58.88% Irl Other - 141,921 (141,921) - Total Revenues 42.327,000 5,356,138 36,960,862 12.66% OUTLAYS- u Share of Joint Works Trail Plant 14,9M,0D0 1,608,732 13,314,268 10,76% District Trunk Searer Corstruction 6,977,000 1,496,941 5,480,059 21.469% j C.OPIBcnd Retirement end Interest Expense 9,469,000 6,012,186 4,456,814 52.93% L Share of Jam Works Operating Expenses 13,085,000 3,091,724 9,993,276 23.63% District Operating&Other Expenditures 2,365,OW 207,415 2,067,585 12.58% Total Outlays 48,819,O00 11,508,998 35,312,002 24.5B% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance V 711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130198 Ci structj nin Progress 14,901,704 1.496.941 (11,181,867) 5,216,778 L Sham of Jam Works 45,974,719 1.608,732 - 47,553,451 Sub-Total 60,876,423 3,105,973 (11,181,857) 52,800,229 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: L Laid and Property Rights 280,231 - - 280.231 Collection Lines end Pump Sins. 74,414,552 11,181,867 - 85,596,419 Treatment Facilities 9,922 - - 9,922 Disposal Facilities 28.419 - - 25,419 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 320,153 - - 320,153 L Equity in Jard Treatment Facil. 206,177,306 (46.429) - 206,130,957 Other Asses at Cost Less Amort. _ Sub-Total 281,230,6M 11,135,4M - MZ3W,101 L Total Property,Plant&Equipment&GP 342,107,086 14,241,111 (11,181,897) 346,166,330 L L L Section 4-Page 4 L Budget Review by District r Revenue Area No. 5 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 .. Operating Budget Review r 1998-99 Year To- Remaining Year-To-Date Budget Dale Budget %Expended REVENUES: r Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - - TaxAllocatonwSubventions(Sham of l%) 2,612,000 136,980 2,475.020 5.24% Connection Fees SOo,000 10,930 489,070 2.19% Other Fees 2,730,000 15,713 2,714,287 0.581% Sale of Capacity Rights - - - - Interest&Misc.Receipts 1.642.000 1,010,068 631,932 61.51% Other - 18,715 (18,715) - '�' Total Revenues 7.484,000 1,192,406 6,291,594 15.93% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 2,DD6,000 212,146 1,793,854 10.58% — District Trunk Sewer Construction 4,079,000 556,985 3,522.015 13.65% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,789,000 984,a74 804.126 55.05% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,844.000 421,076 1,422,924 22.83% District Operating&Other Expenditures 864,500 108,507 755.993 12.55% Total Outlays 10,582,500 2,283,588 8,298,912 21.58% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adlusbnenis Trwofar to Balance r 711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130198 Construction in Progress 1,861,682 556,985 (928,221) 1,490,446 Share of Joint Works 6.062,766 212,146 - 6.274.912 Sub-Total 7,924,448 769,131 (926,221) 7.765.358 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: r Land and Properly Rights 69.740 - - 69.740 Collection Lines and Pump Sirs. 34.300.512 928,221 - 35,228.733 Treatment Facilities 7,347 - - 7.347 r Disposal Facilities 7.115 - - 7,115 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 39,402 - - 39,402 Equity in Joint TreabrreM Facil. 27,219,658 (5,998) - 27,213.650 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - - - - - Sub-Total 61,643.774 922,223 - 62,565,997 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 69.568,222 1,691,354 (928,221) 70,331,355 Section 4 - Page 5 1998-99 First Quarter Report �+ Revenue Area No. 6 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Operating Budget Review L.I 1998-99 Year-To- Reneinirg Year-TmDste Budget Date Budget %Expanded REVENUES: Tat<Leay(Bontl Funtl(s)OnN) _ _ _ _ V Tm[AOacasmrslSubventions(Share of l%) 1.194,000 5270 1.188,730 0.44% Connection Fees 100,000 2,990 97.010 2.99% Other Fees 3,586.00D 68.492 3.517,508 1.91% L Sale ofCapadty Rl" - - - Interesl&Misc Receipts 1219,000 762.917 456,083 62.59% ' 1 Other - 17.487 (17,487) - L Total Revenues 6,099,D00 857.156 5,241,844 14.05% OUTLAYS: Share of Jchd Works Tmd.Plant 1,I108,000 195,301 1,642,699 10.63% Disicl Trunk Serer ConsurAon 3,101A00 (125,096) 3227,096 4.07% COP/Bond Retinamem and Interest Expense 1,135= 628,565 506,435 55.38% Shan,of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,5CA,000 367,789 1,182211 23.73% II 'f Oistic[Operamil&OBra Expenditures 225,500 46.157 180.343 20.38% 1J Total Outlays 7AMOOD 1,111,716 6.738,784 14.16% I Capita FaI:ilBba Budget Review v Babe Adjustments Trdnsforto Balance 7N186 &Additm Fixed Assets 9r3098 Canatmction in Progress 3,192,091 (126,096) (2,357,930) 7W 065 Shareof Joint Warks 5.01.30 195,301 - 5,776,656 Sub-Total 8,773.446 69,205 (2,357,930) 6,484,721 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: 1 Land and Pmperly Rights 5(2 - - 562 L Collection Unes and Pump Sm. 5,157,381 2,367,930 - 7415291 Treabnmt Facilities 2,853 - - 2,663 Disposal Facilities 7,194 - - 7,%4 General PWmand Adimn.Feel. 113,761 - - 113.761 Equity in JointTreabramt Facil. 24.911.510 (6,120) - 24,905,390 Olha Assets atCost Lass MTOR 3&600 - - 36,600 22 Sub-Total 309,541 Z351,810 - 32,581,651 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 39A03= 2,421A75 (2,357,930) 39,056.372 V ll Lr L' Section 4- Page 6 61 Budget Review by District Revenue Area No. 7 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 as Operating Budget Review 1996-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - Tax Albcetiens/Subventions(Share of l%) 2,9B0,000 147,559 2,832,441 495% Connection Fees 500,000 180,503 319,497 36,10% Other Fees TAM.= 183,613 7242.387 247% Sale of Capacity Right _ _ _ Inherent&Misc.Receipts 11593,000 867,121 725,879 54.439/6 Other - 46,590 (46,580)Total Revenues 12,49%0W 1.425,376 11,073,624 11.40% _ OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tmll Plant 4,854,00D 527,997 4,32SOD3 1088% District Trunk Sewer Construction 4A65,00D 464,084 3,60D,916 11A2% COPISond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,974.000 1,127.073 846,927 57.10% Share of Jomt Works Operating Expenses 4.714,000 1,080,380 3.633,620 Zi!S2 Dstret Operating&Other Expenditures 1,504,SW 109.720 1,314,780 12.61% Total Outlays 17,111,500 3,389254 13.722246 1981% — Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Tmnsferto Balance �+ 7n/98 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130198 Construction in Progress 4,361,999 464,084 (3.405264) 1,420,819 ShareofJdmt Works 15.089,216 527,997 - 15.617213 Sub-Total 19,451.215 992,081 (3,405,264) 17,038,032 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Right 1.578,655 - - 1,578,656 Collection Lines and Pump Sts. 41514.588 3,405264 - 44.919352 Treatment Facilities - - - - `� Disposal Facilities 10,782 - - 10,782 General Plant and Admin.Fardl. 98,197 - - 98.197 Equity in Joint Treatment Fact. 67.975.501 (13,990) - 67,961.511 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon 65.557 (11,432) - 54.125 Sub-Total 111243280 3.379,842 - 114.623.122 Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 130.694,495 4,371.923 (3,405264) 131.651,154 r r Section 4-Page 7 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report L Revenue Area No. 11 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review li For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-[o-Dafe Budget Data Budget %Expended ILII REVENUES: Tax Le (Bond Fund(s)Only) 10.000 6,399 4.601 53.99% - Tax Alloca6onslSubvemons(Sham of l%) 2.165,000 106,431 2,068,569 4.92% Connection Fees 500.000 - S00,000 0.00% Other Feas 4,164,000 (2,116) 4,166,116 -0.05% Sale of Capacity Rights 50.000 - 50,000 - InterestBMisc.Receipts 1,299,000 817,260 481,740 62.91% u Other - 32286 (32,286) - Total Revenues 8,188,000 959260 7,228,740 11.72% OUTLAYS: a4 Share of Joint Works Tnnt Plant 3,470,000 365.334 3.104.666 10.63% District Tnrnk Sewer Construction 1,388,000 107,948 1.280.052 7.78% I I COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 1,845,000 899,983 745,017 54.71% L Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2,938,000 W3,335 2,254,665 23.28% District Operating&Other ExpendlWres 715,500 152,379 563,121 21.30% Total Outlays 10,156,500 2,208,979 7,947,521 21,78% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance r+ 717198 &Additions Feed Assets 9130198 Construction in Progress 7,703,440 107,948 (7,406,143) 405,245 I Share of Joint Works 10,440,590 365,3M - 10.805.928 u Sub-Total 18,144.034 473,282 (7,406.143) 11,211.173 COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 146,986 - - 146,986 Collection Lines and Pump Sins. 19,094,427 7,406.143 - 26.500.570 Treatment Facilities - - - - 6w Disposal Facilities 3,053 - - 3,053 General Plant and Admin.Facil. 30.682 - - 30,682 Equity In Joint Treatment Facil. 46.880,113 (10,308) - 46.869.807 Omer Assets at Cost Lem Amon. - Sub-Total 66,155,261 7,396,837 - 73.651.098 Total Property,Plant B Eq uipmen,&CIP 64299,295 7.889,119 (7,408,143) 84,762 ?l L L L, u Section 4- Page 8 L� Budget Review by District r Revenue Area No. 13 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 V Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year-To ata Budget Date Budget %Expended REVENUES: Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - Tax Allocatons9ubventions(Share of l - r Connection Fees 400,000 210,748 189262 52.69% Other Fees 826,000 191 825,809 0.02% Sale of Capacity Right _ _ - r Interest&Muc.Receipt 5981000 380,723 217,277 63.67% Other - 5294 (SIM) - Total Revenues 1.824.000 596,966 1,227.044 3273% r OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tma Plant 562,000 60.012 501,988 1068% District Trunk Sewer Construction 144,000 - 144,000 0.00% r COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 19,000 10.576 6,424 55.66% Sham of Joint Works Operating Expenses 506.000 120.158 385,842 23.75% District Operating&Other Expenditures 24,000 1.881 22,119 784% r Total Outlays 1,255,000 192,627 1.062.373 15.35% Capital Facilities Budget Review r Balance Adjustments Tmnsforto Balance 711198 &Additions Fixed Assets 913098 Construction in Progress - - - - r Share of Joint Works 1,715,026 60,012 - 1.775.038 Sub-Tonal 1,715.026 60.012 - 1,T5,038 a COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Right - - - Collection,Unes and Pump Stirs. 3,033,824 - - 3.033.824 r Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - - General Plant and Admin.Facil. - - - - EquityinJointTreatmentFacil. 7709,858 (1,659) - 7,70B,199 r Other Assetet Cori LessAmod. - - - - Sub-Total 10,743,682 (1,659) - 10.742,023 r Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 12458.708 58.353 - 12,517.061 Section 4- Page 9 1998-99 First Quarter Report Revenue Area No. 14 Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Operating Budget Review 1998-99 Year-To- Remaining Year4o-Dam L� Budget Date Budget %Expended - REVENUES: u Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Ony) - - - - Tax AllmationslSulwentions(Sham of l%) - - - - IRWDFees - - - - 1 Other Fees - 670 (670) V Sale of Capacity Rights - - - Interest&Misc.Receipts 410,000 259,308 160,692 632M Other - 15.790 (15,790) - TotelRevenues 410,000 275.768 134.232 6725% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt Plant 1,676,000 178J162 1,497,018 10.68% ;u Dishla Tmnk Sewer Construdion 232,000 232,658 699,342 24.95% COPIBond ReBremerdand Interest Expense 163,000 62212 90,788 40.66% Sham of Joint Works Operating Eirpensea 1,153,000 290,470 862,530 25.19% District Operates&Other ExpendiWres 211,500 25.155 183,315 13.33% y Toms Outlays 4,126,500 792507 3,332,993 1921% i Capital Facilities Budget Review V Balance Adjustments Tmnamrto Balance 7M198 &Addhmns Food Assets grjow V Construction in Progress 2.053,303 232.658 - 2,286,051 Share of Joint Works 5.114,989 178.982 - 5.293,971 Sub-Total 7,168,382 411,640 - 7,580,022 V COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Properly Rights - - - - 'y Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 25.602,567 - - 25,602,567 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - - GeneralPlanlandAdmin.Factl. 6,747 - 6,747 Equity in Joint Treatment Fact. 22,639.161 (7,459) - 22,631,702 Other Asselsal Coat Less Amon - - - Sub-Total 48248,475 (7A59) - 48.241.01; L Total Property,Plant B Equipment&CIP 55,416.857 404,181 - 55,821,038 — L L I ' U ll Section 4-Page 10 II`rl u Self Insurance Review General Liability Fund Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Percent of Actual Budget Remaining Actual r 1998-99 Through Through low" Through Increase Budget g1301" g190198 Budget 9130197 (Deveue) 1. Beginning Res~ 2,609,160 2,059,473 2.481.670 (422,197) r Revenues 2 In4Jeu Premiums - - - - - 3 Interest 8 Mecellameous 135,000 31,546 23.37% 103,454 25,437 6,109 r 4. RalmMosemerds from tune Fund 1W,000 Z833 1.7m 157.167 - 2,833 r S Total Pw uea 205.000 34,379 11.65% 250,621 25,437 8,942 r r 6 Salaries,Wages and Benefits 4,500 - 4,5W - - 7. gewfihnOeims 130,000 - 130,000 27,225 (27,226) r 8. Contractual Services 5,000 - 5,000 - - 9. Legal SerAces 30O,OOD 89.949 23.32% 230,051 31,876 X073 10. Professional Services 5,000 - S,OOD - - 11. Supplies 80thm Soo - S00 - - 11 Sub-Toldexperuses 445,000 89.949 23.32% 375,051 59,102 10,847 13. Excess Lees Paley 120,ODD 27,873 23.23% 92,127 - 27.tt73 - 14. Toai Expenses 585,000 97,822 17.31% 497,178 59,102 38,720 r 16. Excess Revenue(bermes) (270,OOD) (63,443) 23.50% (206,557) (33.655) (29.718) r 16. Ending Reserves' 2,339,160 1,996,030 85.33% 343,130 2,448,005 (451.975) r ' includes$687,300 long term receivable due from the County of Orange. r Section 5-Page 1 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report L Worker's Compensation Fund Budget Review L For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1998 Percent Actual of Budget Remaining Actual j 1998-99 Through Through 1998-99 Through Increase 61 Budget 9130198 9/30198 Budget 9130197 (Decrease) 1. Beginning Reserves' 659,609 563,272 678,744 (115,472) L Revenues r 2. In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 54,750 24.33% 170,250 53,590 1,160 3. Interest 6 Miscellaneous 35,000 7,990 22.83% 27,010 19,546 (11,556) 4. Total Revenues 260,000 62,740 24.13% 197,260 73,136 (10,396) L Expenses u 5. Salaries,Wages and Benefits - - - - - - 6. Benefits/Claims 250,000 66,710 26.68% 183,290 84,900 (18,190) LI 7. Contractual Services 25,000 - 25,000 - - 8. Legal Services 5.000 4,863 97.26% 137 2,275 2.588 L 9. Professional Services 30,000 - 30,000 300 (300) 10. Supplies S Other - 583 - (583) - 583 LI 11. Sub-Total Expanses 310.000 72.156 23.28% 237,844 87,475 (15,319) Li 12. Excess Loss Policy 25,000 5,430 21.72% 19,570 - 5,430 13. Total Expenses 335,000 77,586 23.16% 257,414 87,475 (9,889) j Ir i� 14. Excess Revenue(Expenses) (75,000) (14,846) - (60,154) (14,339) (507) 4 15. Ending Reserves' 584.609 548.426 93,81% (60,154) 664,405 (115.979) L Includes $139,231 long term receivable due from the County of Orange. u Section 5-Page 2 V Self Insurance Review - This Page Left Intentionally Blank - Section 5- Page 3 Performance Objectives GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE General Management Administration(Division 110) Summary—of Data Ensure treatment cost do" $486/MG $450/MG Cost below Gallonage charge due to lower not exceed target by end of than anticipated expenditures through the fiscal year first quarter. Ensure District meets 521.5 FTEs by 519.75 FrEs Target currently met adopted five year staffing end of fiscal year plan Maintain 100% Compliance 100% 100% Target met. with permit Compliance Deliver 80%of CORE 80% 11.3% Expenditures well under target through first Budget by end of year quarter but target should be achieved by end of 40 quarter. Ensure 95%+of Agenda 96%+% 86% 25/29 Agenda reports were approved. Four Reports are approved by were returned related to broadbanding;Y2K; Committees on first and Conservation,Inflow and Infiltration submission projects. Ensure District Performance 80% 86%Performance Performance objectives and workplan targets Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives have been met for the ls'quarter. Note milestones met within Objectives 83%Workplan however,that with GM approval,some targets 80%Workplan Milestones scheduled workplan tasks can be delayed to a Milestones subsequent quarter given appropriate justification. Not AW� Started Summary Of"Data A 94 78 12 4 83%of workplan tasks that were scheduled (and not delayed with GM approval)were completed. NOTE: The General Manager approved some 1-Quarter Workplan tasks for delay. These do not appear in the above table. Approval requires staff to specify valid reasons for project delay to a subsequent quarter. ti Section 6-Page 1 ' I L 1998-99 First Quarter Report II '' FINANCE DEPARTMENT L Finance Administration(Division 210) :Ftlimance Ob7 4998*9 P.er£orrnance '< r'E'y TaSget Through'Jsf6darter Summary of Data Average Annualized Rate 6% 6.1% The portfolios(long/short term and cash flow r� of Return on Investments management)outperformed their respective benchmarks. Figures based on current yield - - calculations. l y Average Interest Rate 4% 2.80% 1%is equivalent to apprommately$1.7101 Paid on Certificate of annually in interest savings based on variable Participation(COP) rate COPS that are not protected by a long-tern Borrowing interest rate exchange agreement. Remain at or under the $45.21VIillion by $10.4 million through Expenses am being controlled well. Despite net Joint Operating(J.O.) end of fiscal 3months(67%total) one-time costs recorded in the first quarter,we year are on a 92%budget pace. Not s ` .Complele Behind Started. Summary ofData IA r I ' 2 1 1 0 Cost-sharing consultant study is behind schedule. - l u L i L I ) 4 L I Section 6 - Page 2 V Performance Objectives FINANCE DEPARTMENT Accounting (Division 220) Performance Objective 1999-99 Target Performance Through 1st Summaryof.Data Quarter Issue monthly financial Due to end-of-year closings,July's reports within 10 working 92% 67% distribution was delayed. days r. Develop FIS OneWorld 90%trained by 0% The training program is to be conducted in Training program year end the latter half of the fiscal year. Complete cost-allocation 100%by year end Implementation Stage Contract awarded. Project is proceeding. study r Not Complete Beh`md Started Summarybf Data ` 5 4 0 1 Implementation of contract management module in FIS has been delayed. r r r r r r r r Section 6- Page 3 L 1998-99 First Quarter Report FINANCE DEPARTMENT Purchasing &Warehousing (Division 230) '�-Oikrmance.Objldtiv, 1998=99 . Performance Summary of Data Target Through 1st Quarter L.I Maintain cycle count 97%+Accuracy 96.52% 3rd Quarter cycle counting program met Program Rating benchmark target. — JIT Inventory Contract Complete by Research Stage Project may be delayed due to a retirement Li ry 2/99 and re-assignment of staff to Y2K program. Plant 1 Barooding System Complete by Research Stage Products have been demonstrated and staff 3/99 1 is reviewing findings. Lr Implement Procurement Complete by N/A Project currently on hold due to Y2K - Card Program 3/99 program. L Develop Quick Reference Complete by N/A Project currently on hold due to Y2K Guide 3/98 program. 1 Inf Not"• Tasks t + , r r�. 'Complete Behind Started .Summary ofData a7"k1 Lr uS 2 1 0 1 Procurement Card program delayed. u L i u 6J W L Section 6-Page 4 I r Performance Objectives COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT Communications(Division 310) r ;^Pe[tosM'anbe`(D�iJ'elctiva #P,.a'rfcimanea ''Target TrBcougRYst r aOWaker Summary of Data Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 100% Agenda turnaround was delayed in November Turnaround Time 100%of time 1997 due to pending Information from General r Counsel. Board Minute Preparation 10 day 67% Minute's turnaround was delayed In Turnaround Time turnaround December and February due to two-week r 100%of time vacation of Board Secretary and/or PA. Employee Satisfaction 3.0 score WA This survey will be conducted in the 0 Rating(Communications quarter. r Audit) Photocopying Services 93%+ N/A This survey is conducted in the 2dd and 4' Satisfaction quarters. r Graphics Services 95%+ WA This survey is conducted in the 2n°and 4' Satisfaction quarters. r Visitor Tour Satisfaction 65%+ 95% Our tour guide program inomporat ng other Rating Districts employees has met with success as reflected by the performance standard. 60 r p ,.Y[fur�lan,Sas(cs '17asttQuuter C(unnp7eYerlud 'Summary,of:Dafa ' a . r 1 0 0 Workplan task complete. 1 r r r r r Section 6-Page 5 r 1� 1998-99 First Quarter Report GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT L (Divisions 4101420/430') Performance 067ective- 19W99Target Performance. _ Through Ast Summary of Data Auartet Establish Cooperative 100%try yearend Implementation Basic parameters and review committee 1.1 Projects Program Stage established. Proposals due 12/31. Ensure Department budget 95%-100% 21.45% Target currently met. Expenditures tracking V managed to within 95%- well below target 100%of approved funding Ensure Department 90% Pending Will be fully reported in 4e quarter. I.r achieves 90%+of budget performance objectives Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench time 86% Target mat. Pump Stations meets or exceeds target Ensure that collections 90%+spots 87% Trouble spot performance slightly missed due v trouble spots are cleaned on to heavy training in 1.quarter. maintained on schedule schedule li Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 74% Target met. r Fleet Maintenance Division meets or exceeds target - I Ensure planned/prevenbve 75%Planned& 73%Preventive Approaches targeted benchmarks. U maintenance to corrective Preventive 27%Corrective maintenance ratios meets Maintenance targets 25%Corrective Maintenance V Not .Complete: Behind 'Started -.Summary of Data 7 6 0 1 Implementation of DART recommendation not started due to DART delays in FY 97/98. 'Note that GSA Administration, Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined this quarter for reporting purposes. r' V 6i V U Section 6 -Page 6 / I Performance Objectives HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT (Divisions 510/520") r Performance Obfectrvel - 1998-99 Performances Target Through 1st Summary of Data Quarter'. Percentage of supervisor 20.5%by years 23% Supervisor Compensation ratio remains salaries to total does not and below private sector average but does not r exceed 20.5% yet achieve benchmark. (private sector=25%) HR Department managed 90-100%of 23%expended through This is trending at approximately endof- r within budget budget 3 months. year target. Achieve 5-year staffing plan 521.5 FTE's by 519.75 FTE's through This is below our end-of-year target. projections years end quarter r Ensure Department 90% 91%through 1"quarter Complete data will be fully reported in 0 achieves 90%+of budget quarter. performance objectives "Ensure staff receive all 95%by years 84%through t"quarter Target should be met by the conclusion of mandatory training and 40 quarter. r T�r'S'', Not _ Complete Behind Started SummaryoPData - 6 6 n 0 Workplan tasks completed. r 'Note that Human Resources and Training Divisions have been combined for this quarter's reporting purposes. r r r r r r Section 6 - Page 7 r L 1998-99 First Quarter Report HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT U Safety&Emergency Response(Division 530) ' —' bjg'eire g'r9. RerToA �1 ! s>kT®rget 7h '1st Summaryof Data 'Resolve Service Requests 90%of lime 98% Customer Service remains a division �•I within 2 work days priority. This also represents a significant - improvement over last two years'objectives I of a 75%/5 day turnaround and 900/a/3day LY turnaround,respectively. Ensure Injury Incidence is 7.6 incidence 8.3 The objective is below industry standards 45%below industry rate but slightly above our internal benchmark. L average Lost Work Day Case 3.8 incidence 3.0 Target has been met and is signifi=11y Incidence Rate 50%below rate lower than established benchmark. industry average Workers Compensation $403 $29 Costs were negligible the first quarter. Cost Factor 30%below Ld industry average i W '.L'� £ `-i .< ".t+�mne'. ,.;, Summary 12 12 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. L L V L I : 4r.1 L L I L.I Section 6-Page 8 L r Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Compliance and Monitoring (Division 620) *ee•ID6jective 199B-99 Target Performance 1x a e¢k ? Through let Summaryof Data .,C c1 :Quarter Conduct all core ocean 100%of time 100% Target met. monitoring sampling within r NPDES parameters Meet Regulatory Deadlines 100%Deadlines 100% All regulatory deadlines met. and complete associated r reports Distribute high priority 80%Within 7 day 85% Regulatory Target met. legislation information to turnaround 90. Legislative appmpdate staff with 7 working days Ensure 100%spill incidents 100%within 5 days 100% Target met reported within 5 working days. r ry _ ' ?.+i, - .Not _ Started - - r- Complete Behind Summaryot.Data 4 4 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. r r r r r r r Section 6 - Page 9 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report u TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT L Environmental Sciences Laboratory(Division 630) oo -,Gbae1.�e h Performance ''j r1r3n,ti,° 'a"�y7 p a{�yf Through'Ls[ Summary.of Data . ,r.'''. `v r .r;, r{e n y +Quarter I Maintain monthly sample 90%-110%of 99.5% Target met. analyses within"productive" target samples - range taken L Quality Assurance Testing 95%correct on 100% 100%on internal samples. Awaiting results on laboratory samples 1"' analysis- for external samples. L100%on 2nd I ` s�NCo17`a[inTesks � '� .Not : u i.. �° i"'attAriartai- otPplefe.'� BehNd Started Summapyt ofDalah ''J�rir 2 2 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. y� it v L u L II 6W L L L L L Section S-Page 10 L Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Source Control(Division 640) `Performanee°Ob)ective 1998-99 Performanee Target Through 1st Summary of Data Quarter r Maintain field inspection 2.5 monitoring 2.7 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note, productivity events/day however,that due to data collection methods _ data is for 4w quarter of FV 97198. Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal. actions within 30 days of _ noncompliance event Issue industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal. permits prior to expiration r Revise and develop local Complete 100% Project on-going 100%of scheduled tasks t"ate are limits for pollutants of of project by end complete. concem of year r r iNolcyfalieTa4ks Not lrstQtrarter :Complete Behind Started Summary:ofData: 4 4 0 0 Wod#o Wales co pleM. r r r r r r Section 6 -Page 11 r I L 1998-99 First Quarter Report L ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Division 710/721 '.Ale�'f lad t ;bA, . '1998=99:. Pe1 o ' 'nce' ?IAngle :`. "IHrott 7st• Summary of Uata G1FlaYster - y Manage Engineering CORF 80%+ 10.7% Due to unanticipated project delays and other Budget expended by issues,less expended than anticipated. years end However,8 is expected that by the and of the L fiscal year we will be on-target. Bid construction projects on 80%+of time 100% Target met. established Capital L Improvement Program schedule Meet design project 80%+of time 97% Target met. Noted improvement noted over I milestones last fiscal year. 61 Meet 90%of project Complete 100% Based on revised Strategic Plan schedule, milestones for Strategic Plan project by 3199 milestones have been met. L Respond to environmental 100%of time 100% The District Is typically allowed 30 days to correspondence within 30 respond to inquiries. ' working days Ld F4 n i s .y IJ Not h>i "f iolt#r t+hamP `` '�Ntlttii Started Summary oflData . L 10 8 2 0 Behind schedule on project management training tasks and revised planning process for long-term CIP scheduling. � � 'Note that Engineering Admit. and Planning&Design Division have been combined for this quarter's reporting Lu purposes. V L I V L L L Section 6-Page 12 V r Performance Objectives ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Construction Management(Division 730) r - ' R10=0 dbJecdve, 1998.99- Performance Summary of Data ,- Target Throygfi'�°C'Duartet: r Target Change Order mats 5% 3% Change order costs are always based on at no greater than 5%of the preceding four quarters. Targets have original contract amount been met (industry standard=7.25%) r Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 100%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is always based on Occupancy in facilites days 0%-240 days the premdingfourquarters. Fourjobs within targets 40%-within 240 weremmpleted. The target was days exceeded. Conduct Quality Control 10%or less 2.65% Target has been met based on OC Inspections and average no inspections. r more 10%correctable deficiencies 77777 - � - r HehinA Sbrted Summary of Data 8 7 1 0 Behind schedule on project management training tasks. r r r r r r Section 6-Page 13 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT L O&M Administration (Division 810) '"Slli :ftyfosmance- *' a . . Targef TfiwQghefst Summary of Data Ensure Operations $312/million $301/million gallons Target met treatment cost per million gallons treated treated gallons does not exceed I 1 target Ensure Total injury 12.2 8.15 Target met Frequency Rate 25%or or less more below industry ( ) average Ensure Five-year staffing 208.25 FTEs by 216 FTEs Due to delays in plant automation pmjects I plan figures are met end of year (J-42)this number may be revisited in the forthcoming 4-year staffing plan. Not .SehVd �rt Summary Lj 1 1 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. u L L L L u L L Section 6- Page 14 i u Performance Objectives `y OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Operations &Maintenance Processing Support(Divisions 8201870) .. Pef£grmancs b tive- ?898-90 Performance 'Target ihrgpgh Ast Summary of Data ''@UaftBF Ensure u811ty,chemical, 90%-100% Natural Gas: On target. biosolids and oxygen within budget 95.2%(annualized) contracts are managed Power.57.6% within budget (annualized) Ensure Capital Outlay 80%+of 6me -80% Project milestones met. r Revolving Fund(CORF) project milestones are met Respond to trouble- 80%+ 100% Target met. shooting and service requests by established priority time frames „r Maintain average cost per $.050 $0.45 Target met. kilowatt hour($/kWh) •Maintain therms/kWh at .111 themis/kWh .108 thenns/kWh- Within targeted parameters. d Central Generation plants -Plant 1 Plant 1 (kilowatt hour)within .106 therns/kWh .108thenns/kWh- targeted limits -Plant 2 Plant2 ,r 'Maintain FERC efficiency 42%or greater 65% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit at Central Generation requirements thus gaining favorable natural plants within targeted limits gas transmission rates. r ,7asks '9F�reluarter Complete Behind Started Suninrary ofData 2 2 0 0 Workplan tasks complete. ,r *Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined this quarter for reporting purposes. r r Section 6 -Page 15 L 1998-99 First Quarter Report OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Plant Operations(Divisions 830/940) L Perfe'imance0bjective 1998.99 Target Perfannaoee TnriAtillitlit SummaryofData r Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 77%Plana 1 Target met Removal Targets in Primary Treatment 70%>at Plant 2 72%Plma 2 Process bw Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 48%>at Plant 1 51%Plena 1 Low influent BOD (BOD) Removal Targets in Primary and Plant 2 38%Plant 2 concentrations at Plant 2 and Treatment Process primary basin rehab project 1 impacted P2 numbers although Ir final effluent within norms. Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 25%(1 hour 6.9%Plant 1 Overtime much lower than total leave hours taken does not exceed overtime per 4 13% Plant 2 benchmark due to light first r targets hours leave taken) quarter training schedule and bansfer of Sr. Plant Operate to P1 nightshift. i V Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 2.9% Plant 1 See above. does Trot exceed targets salary 3%Plant 2 L i `imsks Not - L.I ~ Complete 'Behind Started SummaryofXlW:-- _ 2 1 1 0 Safety training identification 1 behind schedule. Ir L 6i L L L L I1 U Section 6- Page 16 Lei Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Maintenance Divisions (Divisions 8501860) r , . iJ1 oRnande Objective 1998+99 Target Performance Through 1st Summary of Data " Quarter Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 58% Target met. Time In Mechanical Maintenance Division r Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 47% Target met. Time In Electrical& Instrumentation Division r Ensure 60%Wrench 47.5% 69% Time/Direct Support Time Target met. in Mechanical Maintenance r Division Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 61% Target met. Time In Electrical& Instrumentation Division Ensure preventive <100% 17% Preventive maintenance cycles were refined maintenance backlog in and in many instances extended due to on- Mechanical Maintenance is going research and actual need. This less than 100% changed due-dates and thus significantly reduced backlogs. Ensure preventive <100% 12% See above. maintenance backlog in Mechanical Maintenance Is less than 100% r 'Wo'rk„pIan TasUs '/1lOf �n ,� 't•rrsrtitpetYw • .Complete Behindhad .Summary of Data r 7 5 2 0 Hazardous energy control procedures have been slightly delayed. r r r r r Section 6- Page 17 r 1998-99 First Quarter Report u OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT L Air Quality&Special Projects(Division 880) i `Performance Objective i 19S8-f98 .. Performance Through- _ Target - 1st Quarter Summary of Data Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 100% Performance objective is on target �+ deadlines Complete approved 80%+projects 7 of 9 have started or in- Target met research projects including completed by progressto date project planning,design and year's end field investigation L r 4 f� RA�sT6 - - :Not ,1 i �€aF Oomp7efe ,HAh1etl �ar6elf . 'gummarlr Epata `� 18 11 4 1 Some projects delayed due to researching I Plant 2 Odor problems. y WA L L L L �.I L L 1 ' 6 Secilon 6-Page 18 r Performance Objectives r INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT (Divisions 920193019401950') r ::Performance Objective - 1998.99 - Performance: Target Through lst Summary of.Data Quarter r Resolve all help desk calls 80%+within 5 79% Target met. days r Ensure limited radio-system Lessthan.5% 0% Target met. outages Meet Capital Outlay 85%+Div 930 100% Target met. Revolving Fund(CORF) 75%+Div 940 75% project milestones by due date Maintain Computer Network 97%+ 99.02% Target met. 'Up-time' Maintain Database'Up- 95%+ 97.55% Target met. time' Maintain SCADA server 99.5%+at both 100% Target met. 'Up-time plants r !'C6007ats - Behlntl Started "Summary of!Data ..... r 3 2 1 0 Y2K Risk-based analysis of larger scope than expected and behind schedule. 'Note that Information Technology divisions and Plant Automation division have been combined this quarter for r reporting purposes. r r r r Section 6 -Page 19 L 1998-99 First Quarter Report L L L L L L This Page Left Intentionally Blank. u 6 L b L+ Ir 60 L V Section 6-Page 20 6I Orange County Sanitation District (714) 962-2411 mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 . street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 OCSD 11/25/98