Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-11-18 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT November 12, 1998 phone: 17141982-2411 ma81ng.4eres.: NOTICE OF MEETING P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valle,CA 9272B.8127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS street i . 1 O844 EIIIa . ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Fo An.cAuntain VaWney Cl+ 92708-7018 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1998 - 6:30 P.M. DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Msmbtr 108" Ellis Avenue A...tits Fountain Valley, California 92708 • cities The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Ao.h.. Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain ✓alley Full.rton Gereen Grove Huntington Bosch Irvine L.Hebr. Ls Pelmo .fit/wi t Los Alamim. Newp.rt Basch Bb rd Secretiry Orange Plaoantla Sante A's Seal Beach Boonton Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings uaun U Perk lbrbs;a Linea c...tv or Drones STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 18, 1998 at 3:00 p.m. Sanitary Districts Costa Mass SPECIAL MEETING OF THE Mleway City BOARD OF DIRECTORS (TENTATIVE) - Saturday, November 21, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. Water Districts PLANNING, DESIGN AND Irvine Rnnr li CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, December 3, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 9, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE/AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, December 16, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. o um.,.., Puhtc Heav an,l m.Envronment nnr.ugh Excellence in Wastewater Systems' BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting November November18, 1998 December December16, 1998 January January 27, 1999 February February 24, 1999 March March 24, 1999 April April 28, 1999 May May 26, 1999 June June 23, 1999 July July 28, 1999 August August 25, 1999 September September 22, 1999 October October 27, 1999 November November17. 1999 December December 15, 1999 AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 18, 1998—6:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro lem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 11/18/98 Page 2 oft 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager c. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on September 23, 1998 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: 10/15/98 10/31/98 Totals $4,205,168.51 $3,608,042.68 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the Rem to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 11/18/98 Page 3 of 5 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re November 18, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 28, 1998 to be filed. 10. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re November 4, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 4, 1998 to be filed. C. Authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley, providing for the City to use District's diesel and unleaded fueling station at Plant 1 at cost plus 5% administration fees, in a form approved by General Counsel. d. Authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation providing for payment for the operation of the CNG Refueling Station at a cost of$0.10 per gallon for all sales, and maintenance costs of$900 per month plus parts, for one year, in a forth approved by General Counsel. e. (1)Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Global Security Complex for an option to purchase a 640-acre site in Kem County for an amount not to exceed $62,400, in a form approved by General Counsel; and (2)Authorize the General Manager to initiate and conduct due diligence research of said 640-acre site for use as a biosolids composting facility and for composting of other related feedstock including manure, green waste, food wastes and other agriculture residues in an amount not to exceed$100,000. 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re November 5, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 5, 1998 to be filed. C. Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-3, providing for additional planning and design services in the amount of$293,022, increasing the total amount not exceed $1,403,740. 11/18/98 Page 4 of 5. 11. d. Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camilo Engineers for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, providing for additional programming services and testing, for an additional amount of$62,993, increasing the total amount not to exceed$7,119,469. 12. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1998. 13. Receive and file Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Groundwater Replenishment System, dated November 5, 1998. 14. Election of Chair a. Consideration of nominations 15. Election of Vice Chair a. Consideration of nominations 16. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, K necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(C). 2. Confer with General Counsel re pending matter of litigation for Robert Burge, at al. v. Sanitation District of Orange County, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 800278 (Government Code Section 54956.9). 3. Confer with General Counsel re pending matter of litigation for Wal-Con Construction Co. v. County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 782457 (Government Code Section 54956.9). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 11/18/98 Page 5 of 5 17. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 19, Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 20. Adjournment NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the dose of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Managerand General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 %VadonWatet%wp.dlelagendMi998 Joint Board AgerdesU 7 7998.doc ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 11/18/98 TIME: 6:30 D.m. (HOLMBERG) ........ ANDERSON ....................y/ ✓ (FLORY) ............... BANKHEAD .................... — (BOYD) ................ BROWN .........................�/ ,✓ — (COOK) ................ COLLINS ........................� — (NOYES)............... DESAY........................... — (FRESCHI) ............ DENES............................ y/(DOTSON) ............ DONAHUE......................�/ — (PARKER) ............. DUNLAP.........................y/ (UNDERHILL)......... ECKENRODE...................� (PERRY) ............... FERRYMAN ....................� (WISNER) ............. GULLIXSON.................... 6✓ av _ (BROADWATER).... LEYES............................JL (MAULLER)........... MARSHALL .................... (LUTZ) ................. MC GUIGAN ...................JL _.Z— (WALKER) ............ MINER-BRADFORD........... � (COONTZ) ............ MURPHY........................i/ — (KEENAN)............. PIERCY .......................... y/ — (EVANS)............... RICE.............................. o� a — (POTTS) ............... SALTARELLI ................... /, _— (HAMMOND)......... SHEA.............................__Jz (SPITZER)............. STEINER......................... � — (HARMAN) ........... SULLIVAN......................� — (MILLER) .............. SWAN ........................... J� — (BATES) ............... SYLVIA.......................... � — (DALY)................. ZEMEL..... ................ ... Q"/ a/ — STAFF: Anderson Ghirellip Hodges Kyle �dP Ludwin ✓ McIntyre pact Miles Ooten Peterman Streed Tuchman OTHERS: Woodruff Andrus H:Mp.ft ln=%DIRECTORWIna]ma Rao COILA SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) ��t_�-'✓ _grin C 'v/i[PCi� it c /2 i CHAIRMAN'S REPORT BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18,1998 1 . BECAUSE OF CHRISTMAS THE DECEMBER BOARD MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THE THIRD WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16T", ONE WEEK EARLIER THAN USUAL. 2. ON DECEMBER 15T, THERE WILL BE A GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE GWR) OPEN HOUSE AT THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT BETWEEN 2 AND 7 P.M., AND ON DECEMBER 8T" AT 5:30 P.M., THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE GWR PROJECT WILL ALSO BE HELD AT THE WATER DISTRICT. YOU ARE INVITED TO ATTEND THESE EVENTS. IF YOU WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION ON EITHER OF THESE EVENTS, CONTACT MICHELLE TUCHMAN. 3. IT WAS MY PLEASURE TO REPRESENT THIS BOARD AT THE DEDICATION OF THE COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS STATION ON OCTOBER 30TH, AND I WANT TO THANK i THOSE DIRECTORS WHO ATTENDED. THE TURN OUT WAS MOST IMPRESSIVE AND STAFF DID AN EXCELLENT JOB PREPARING FOR THIS OCCASION. 2 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r Penny KYle (2 copies no label) Board Secretary November 12, 1998 phone: (714)962-2411 To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors :nailing address: P.O. Ball 8127 Fountain Valley, Subject: Board Letter 92728-012727 street addrew: 10844 Ellis Avenue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional Fountain valley,ca information on any of the items, please call me. 92708-7018 Computer Loan Program Mnmher We began the Computer Loan Program in the summer of 1997 and it has been a Ag=.tits great success. To date, we have had 115 employees apply for loans and buy • computers. As of October 20, 1998, we have loaned $250,000, have collected cities $143,017 in payments and have$106,983 available for future loans. Requests from Anahalm employees are less frequent, but we are still receiving them. The Human Resources area Department has heard numerous comments of appreciation for the program from Buono Perk employees. Lypre Fountain Mley Fullerton Garden craw Directors Workshop Huntington Beech rrwra A Directors' Workshop has been tentative) scheduled for Saturday, November 21, to La Habra P Y ti Le Pelme discuss the proposed change to apay-for-pertormance compensation system. The Los Alamitos Steering Committee has scheduled a special 3 p.m. meeting on November 18 to Newpwtorangge discuss this subject, and the results of that meeting will determine whether to hold the Plecentia Saturday workshop. An announcement will be made at the November 18 Regular Santa Me Board Meeting and notification by fax will be sent to all Directors on the status of this sear Basch Stantonvery important issue. k Ylle Park ar Perk vorbe Linda Fleet Reduction Council of Drosso Staff has recently re-evaluated our Fleet needs. As a result of that evaluation, staff saniurr, Districts was able to eliminate 40 vehicles with high mileage or that were otherwise obsolete. These vehicles will be sent to auction. The monies raised as a result will be placed cache Mo. back into the General Fund. Very few, if any, of these vehicles will be replaced, and Midway city those that will be replaced will be replaced with Alternative Fuel Vehicles (either Water Districts electric or CNG). Over the past 5 years, staff has eliminated almost one half of the Inane Ranch Fleet through this program. Y2K Update An excerpt from an article on Y2K: "AT&T chairman and CEO Michael Armstrong, who is heading the industry-government Network Reliability and Interoperability Council working on Y2K issues, called the task before the communications industry 'To Protect the Pubhc Health and the Environment through Excellence 11 Marewater Systems' r l - Board of Directors Page 2 November 12, 1998 'daunting'. Domestic and international providers need to make sure their networks will inter-operate smoothly as the date rolls over to Jan. 1, 2000. That means doing 60,000 years'worth of testing on systems and equipment in 443 days, Armstrong said." The following Statement For The Record by Lacy Suiter, Executive Associate Director of the Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency was made before the United States Senate Special Committee on the Y2K Technology Problem on October 2, 1998: The Council is scheduled to release a report later this year that narrows down the risks and describes a plausible worst-case scenario. John Koskinen, Chairman of the President's Council on Y2K Conversion, attended our August meeting of the primary Federal Response Plan agencies, and stated that, domestically, he is most concerned about small- and medium-sized organizations (public and private); and over-reaction by the public. He believes that the basic infrastructure will work and that there will be no major nationwide catastrophic disruptions, but that there may be needs for Federal response in some service sectors and in some geographic areas. Too Clean for the Fish? District's staff is known for the saying, 'The bluer the water, the fewer the fish." Now, one of the District's consultants, Alan Meams, has co-authored an article, Too Clean for the Fish?, which appeared in a recent addition of the Seattle Times. The article discusses the link between nutrient and organic inputs to local waters and how they impact fish abundance. Dr. Meams notes that while many coastal waterbodies have gotten cleaner, there has also been a marked decrease in the number of fish. He and his colleagues propose a more holistic approach to environmental and species management. The article ends with a suggested five-point strategy to lake a broader look at the Puget Sound ecosystem. A copy of the article is included in the attachments. Odor Complaints Between October 20 and 29, five odor complaints were received. Four were the result of plant operation and the fifth was most likely from a city storm drain. Operations staff made corrections as necessary to solve the problems. Board of Directors Page 3 November 12, 1998 Test Method Modification Approved by EPA In June 1998, the District began conducting acute toxicity testing under the auspices of the new ocean discharge permit. In this test, live animals are placed in a control tank containing effluent to determine whether the effluent is toxic to aquatic life. The test—referred to as an acute toxicity test_uses a younger, more sensitive, life stage of the fathead minnow(fish) than was mandated in the District' previous permit. The first fathead minnow acute toxicity test conducted did not meet the permit-required 30-day average toxicity value. With additional testing, the 30-day value was met, but the test results were still abnormally high, nearing non-compliance values. Staff suspected that artificially high levels of ammonia in the test tank caused the high test values. Ammonia is a component of the effluent and occurs in a balance between the ionized (non-toxic) and the un-ionized (toxic)forms. The balance between the two is controlled by a number of factors, including pH and temperature. Due to the test temperature (prescribed by EPA) and length of the test (96-hours), pH tends to drift up over the duration of the test. As pH rises, the amount of the toxic forth of ammonia in the test solution also rises, creating artificial ammonia toxicity. Artificial ammonia toxicity can be controlled by adjusting the pH of the test solution, but any changes to test procedures must be first be approved by EPA. Staff completed a study that verified artificial ammonia toxicity and forwarded to EPA a recommendation for pH adjustment in the acute toxicity test. In October 1998, the District was granted the requested pH control for conducting all acute toxicity tests using the fathead minnow. The rapid response of the District's Ocean Monitoring Program staff assured continued compliance with our ocean discharge permit and EPA's approval of the modified test method speaks highly of staffs technical expertise. Review of July 21 Newport Beach Spill On July 21 of this year, a contractor drilled into one of the District's force mains in Newport Beach. Approximately 120,000 gallons of raw sewage were spilled: Of this, 20,000 gallons were contained and the remainder entered a storm drain and flowed into Lido marina. District personnel assisted in the cleanup of spill and the Orange County Health Care Agency closed the area for several days. The Assistant General Manager directed staff to conduct a thorough "post mortem" on the incident to determine what went wrong, why it happened, and lessons to be learned. After interviewing District personnel involved in the events leading up to, during, and after the spill, the inquiry focused on the District's Dig Alert program. Board of Directors Page 4 November 12, 1998 As an agency that owns and operates underground structures (e.g., sewer pipelines) the District is required by State law to participate in the underground service alert program—also known as the Dig Alert program. Contractors and others planning an excavation project are required to notify the District of plans to dig underground and in turn the District is required to alert contractors of the presence of a sewer line in the vicinity of an excavation. The District is responsible for field marking the line if we believe the line is at risk of being hit by the excavation. In the Newport Beach situation a contractor for the Gas Company notified us through a Dig Alert notice of their plans to relocate a gas pipeline. District staff did not respond to the Dig Alert notice. Staff concluded the force main in the location of the proposed excavation was not at risk bemuse it was buried 5-10 feet below the gas line. What the contractor failed to tell us in the notice was they were planning to drill extraction wells to dewater the excavation. The contract ruptured our force main in the process of drilling one of those dewatering wells. What did we learn from our review: First, our staff at all times followed the District's existing Dig Alert procedures in screening out this notice and deciding not to respond. Second, our existing Dig Alert procedures are not adequate to prevent situations like this from occurring again. Staff screened out a notice that, in hindsight, we should have responded to either by marking the line in the field or notifying the contractor of the presence of the line in the vicinity of the excavation. In response to the review of this incident, the Engineering Department is in the process of analyzing and refining its Dig Alert policies and procedures to lake a more preventive approach. Program improvements will be put in place to: • enhance communication between office staff and field inspectors; • provide better training and supervision of the program staff; • establish more stringent screening criteria to determine when to field mark a sewer line; • make a positive, prompt response to all Dig Alert notices either by field marking, notifying the excavator in writing if a line is nearby, or with a phone call when no line is located in the area. If we can prevent even one major spill with these new procedures it could save the District tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in avoided labor costs, cleanup costs, contractor claims, and administrative penalties. The matter is presently under administrative review by the staff of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Board staff has told us that the District's involvement in the events leading up to the spill is being looked at from a"strict liability" standpoint. It is our understanding the matter will be considered by the RWQCB at its January 1999 Board meeting. Board of Directors Page 5 November 12, 1998 Articles of Interest I have attached articles on subjects of importance or interest to the District that you may not have seen. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Donald F. McIntyre tyre V General Manager DFM:jt H\WP.WWOMI"WDFM1 MERSMi EROAR�l I I M.00O Attachments Tut: Shnrn.s.Taus COMMENTARY SUnwY,JULY 19, 1998 B 5 Llslde Cpinlons 8,,llIl//aB,II IJ'u, anon:Pe c e B) gowmdsb:Yecc 85,6 MANAGING 1NE NAIERVYAYS RW, 70 Too clean forfish .? a. . the Sam elsotlleYe gelmm head thraudh A,Holland asan l}eir nay m" Lade IPo.sh...ho in jury 19IP.The U parfinemoJFisberler runs la open the ldelurliahiaW On,ofInget 358 W amved Below J1.1j6,d),have berm wren of the hichsin Are post)yeerre, ♦PUGET SOUND I,appraachinggh it...,,highthhfq bud less-abundanl/ish communiry. Scientist,who in the past suggested that same apartment o(nmDiext and organic input might be be.. vial to line SPmm,ar at least not harnlJml,noire disrounded by the media,regndmosy agencies and publicnadoocarygromps. bit time to take another look at the relationship between organic matter and fish habitat? rd '.uWa.....I.,rn.vr........e . bused,he lYumlWns W father ait.'ITayim Sa d I l' here war orinaboSing ad Seri I I e.l String' 1 L1 when.are M1 froloo, i 111I LJ M1 their feral mend. ay fishr Il J - ry What we din Y buteugut 1,—isielyet they hand .. Y.m M d ali 8 - daorta" NL I tingly II f the hound rush W C lov S al I look I ShellfishV. J by consuming- each year? i ,uses between har,cuuM Palle - Wlr M1 q- W d Il 1 Y>l 1 - y bl antl elwa hang.. I hT Iho U-stie n.r(they arv,the So—a use being � � Nan',Ilaryr:neJ.But it Iwks liY.we're gelling cbx. east,a aJr4m L%krwn Sau J,rnfish"vwrlraJalion. �1 SauM War Qualn,gety.Tend a report IN Netwere. What Awl n vMgv. LI your -Jv nN North Lhifle ,amnia to an were. Hv( Q cI iiac - gLa.Y andlwLhlwevm _ r�' tweed uvJ�11 I Itw rrl relate uld R R 1. td�-ts d Ma N 16 'was ar q Iul - 'rS u Wen III, 1 1 r N ham PWIY Wm 1 Ina big—his h - W ur—n e J ( {a..� t v3• arrWly I+nI AM1 I, I,.I lln— file,M1 e h W Mc A Niger Su E lv h result an e' S F continued ceneereants.dedgung, hine and LoMen WII klun—,he W.,,barleyWLI Afil. ryrf ta'd1 M Y.' Y thwterwi firepublic INA we ba We beli to fish. MII(sh nutM1 I he i,.eShift hasafferted x4 a1h+ p.� ;P��eyyww t afluttan andN return Is fewer fish,nar trount, IM1e entire PardicC - I where p1jukhe-M( M1 W - it.I'd MUbe 51 1 8 U . by wl dby N M1 Lu ,S IIYI J g M1 I Y ra y rJL F"-ape h bl Y l Is d g M Presentably,this- 11a rase bIu. Sn J llr ii rni program Such a poiseen wAlp g I Jifa.f.ACS . J the publue new 111treatersfor g d In ur knowledge there preas.in place in IUSIL un,un.utly.RISC US entire orthsturV 1 tr omlure laughter and 11.11 fed Nit Mmnd VY J 11-, du sears mumsand M1 l ar re dun rrlh llul Is 11x N. d Nellie 1Mur 1 sa d mr Ln+l ax v x L P Aih IIY -h bI1Y.due -rt.r N 1 lbrvduv.a r'nmYrl.m',gre—h—WitLUYa.I P 1 Alak 1 Wfina hnand nil J. .rynhhr¢IIal nllld aUwl,l-fish red lust PdluWne T' .... Il NNUa m ng:WCle,,We..su Ass Awre Ly,Llighl.d "n the rccau,ampler by Muss Anrhrbw("Novae.ul Did ire-In,Armin,the bah? I liSeUr "Ju1Y 11 and 15.) '1 he re relmim brt—n clan valet aIW Jmlininp m ` Fansiom esam w Ple Prereed yW.Nmraemenl of manna fish implwa tNl Vast Lrllu,im may has been a p.rJ :Y a b Y Vpirrg r.aWuht fiat and at leastwr hat,ahuWuxv.11ow rW yuu caVlaix h:e.p....., oll..r...nu'.Y nJ..... a nnu l m Jix'bn sjllI HII rvun aq�wM1en w.xv. -ow..it pull-all wa11a1 ma live rvJu ullulu ul piny hundreds J Inma a-m%anir lmlmiW exyun4 merit m be Wood.wan IRwfixo, ed-W sWn uWv' IN unxnnl M".Isla se:AN,wresariePW,nsol IImmb It, IYSb at,1!NQIs,wMn Said,EmnAt vrJnn W thew'pav4ilities taut,led lu. and'I . .obila avers,daily lekn un mN lg Wrc4ul 4/Ienrhel f.W:illa! waste.man w lLe Sound.IxxlutW lneu in were real Na Wanly W Ith-end,wlo•lose.ncFfiah at,1.ral 1. We are all familiar with Herschel and leis gang of 11 nA du ml eA Ire,sama,taller d..I,.but It it.. Cablwn user burn wlwmlhQ♦d a1¢INudaW sake me Ater wmma.[lama and erualr[canY IN,thrus t Nc1iallwiwb*'IN HeruMli wcrtsentu l'Nritla eel lain their friend,Are still co wing large numbers W Salmi as mmN cei i.somil .To M fah along the cwu.H.I.WI i1 so Wume certain.makers fish in the Huwami h Waterway and Doing the ped Owner eunlury.the Sound has Wen Akl walled but Armti'ancre plagued with fin or am .Aber Oaearu caused or the w,la. hint fist were idinalki even flare.le :.asatlne the his a.Al,high b.h Monitoring the Sound ,xWm mayWJ,w ...I.x .tlw rare..a.,... .II.,.A•lW polot sjdwyN yrvuJ Ae.k.x eu w eel lmu .I..F.emul MNJLx bUle..A IN,seed to .t,, ..JMN.N• ndiai NNu-WdJWn An"..Aws,A the S.mW laud lots.al nmgtbrJJe .mlWpYrnwnwWaw mdlukwa/W.Ilan err eweryrM A-ore, Puhlia onW, has huen .e.....nto lisk.the mcca�impliu Nts is than White wdllllrub um tlul we dant wane billions in public money w lalSe r..µmluoPuge Pl damossnW ALl Suxxd 'Li.wAWi and Lnior NorvalW wdw-Ic4ne the turn W IN century-traYLc.lust capecta14ms or cwnleapwiterse mnugemenl anwna. As la h 1 YW M Illfwer fish or lM Sound-at 11wre willM ba - l-twom to Wmil lot 2xrm Ins!that organic d San,loan jeet,nours,FoJi slash as Arle.dmmdll rmLfish also read. wine of our priessidgerical Artesia may fam Men won. Ism IM1e R (called J Went we Imareating during the Alb and NIA,An excess terproduct m so a numberW Aniffe.man Ahuub fell. us)IN used ft Nan ilwons e dl.lr J t J h F be.poll still will net1 YYrais or .If she•\l I Ilnte alormarn -uenad arLdind.1 As Mil yhe theI situation what e now reader is chall M d by the 4lNt' exactly 1\ 1M fl 11 J .tied n J M1 'Ib 14 disease,Sort kas ow went hallvY do).As I Anapp yn (1 'YWY IA Nlg delsn The MYd Sausnal Wine,Quetta,M' T eam w Un J I 1d I JI hit,, S I UW of fish WIII isle the vat t geo('m suarow d¢uvary. er dew C�•. I,,,has.M I lwr IY III tidal 100,041leant duringd urfa IesuraQemem auqunvWabraader LM retu. Awh advdnr.-a in wastewater lican ep gul•n,t Wie1Itl NN a Ix MJ Na M lu d p IM4 OZ 9I m.1did IN the W 4 rS W Maybe,twl a I µ' t I or A e \ I Lanu�u floor l I means l l I ° 'n' i 1 1 lamp ti XI Iwt oil l nut authors IN,mJyp M M oiled broader II 6i Sound.The U• ` UXn tI - fit h u E0td - K. M1g van AI MvnI main ( Y g 1' Ih1 pin II.A. 'I spills,red tides, �,d I M M J W -I sl J J I V I 1 u Ih 1M1 . \ r Y Lsl LS j)1 (Eder M And Fu AI L 1 1 na-rud m 11 Moist wJ 1 G 1 Ice Agencies ci L':I F I ew w N W dN 1 J IJLf Ih J FI 1 14.IJIN ud L ly what DI : 1 IDeanc . Iryilphh J y h-IIIM1 II IIY IIIWI b Iw, said A ophtl -h ill IIIM' II µR I I M ml II pf Ily INF+I J Ad leads..Scaulle. xelsld ss MSouM lIwe caNer. Iax1X f IIIX / 1 AI -on LW or rWas, MAW I,'bar l I And W 1 '1 WHIN Ill " gh PuN (Sound mural gt 1 we mmai uJl„�C/.� t d • !.i Wend Yr nil I liIg I en J ati , yt pp h IMtom NOW-t ill wwuiW Us. JA -Y 1 with qllli I gwllYI - N IN10 l { Yli [ An y I. {••�•• Wanl p I.A.I h but A Ja WIev1 PWn W 6F n N : Il osir;LxNh \1, I hi. 1991 book 1 M1 U 1 sea n e AM be Jc hnh 1 all la l or. Yass elm P W slmlds. hnI xy I F Washington d b W W YM'ttexlMm N f surs INemerimIla,larrud. �for Sister.EN-mos...WbIll T• + hey a University dW M1' M Art with the199J National Research Council I d MCAccl 9e I• Na: I ml h I II ll v t St gig Wastewaters to C urban plus I.tln rd h M M d- Coastal maddieQ aPcde .. rJ •• ul Iruwd aewaNe in IYM 1 I ke uFe+ A m,N fisMIYTM'a' gnphY Mna ho It, hwyt row'.W &elan l bna J I W II Sound prostates U 4 N ,)/ Sound 1VILIb O4M1µMvpi Ed ntlw sIIIi ILWh' g, and 1N AJ.... -114 irallaa anatlu•d w11X.. lay A. K. ! Win, IM1 I • 1 M••1•srNMillaet•1g•F ,A x y lira IWyI le Yq •IuuhY NMwlwe9 Iml phl - Weld l ` .".i LWi hew bull P W I Sake,A '1get Ihel.xW.N ids N1 mido,-I and fat, ,c . a IS~Coal Jr.la a blow. kam I and dl (JI Ian I rya h Id M IgI I W pe udustnal history bQlul wAttoQ pN P,asmA tuWIY,N ,ury py nddoo y iladtr sMWea ' •% INN IN M1 lh t I M the H! 1 theirNM ltEgC and their y, with IN h brad D •age Cdg ry WI it is, tat I At IN dA1 pb IWbu . Wr an 1 11MceilaY IWu c In N I lem.1,'I ,trends artanneI Ade la his Start,that As I throure INuk of l' Warshe birds. te 1er Angola,fish Lundri,a.fishing 41.10.ud ipg0.. •L NM C 1 ewe W n A l narratoragriculture. 1 p 1 rumH Carl.. W 1\ F -I (.Ali goal I I Shia," events,' F Agt st 1 I ao g t I s helped 0 by ud tail mdels for menay Iltw cti alms bM Jkl 1 d ghA4d uaD NgwnmmW Ptgn Soared. Signal A}l As Ihlin lW I I I Il M her1 Ise pi fpeW .. f \i'lu` }I fI� Mdraw,Ae . 1M. M1 Ic., A W ImW ria—missy tlrpe s'awastIA orris nwrd•�' r 1/ \Pubpop w1J11 -' deco wide Ads....wan 4wfi Ix JI ass ntu wln All Jwr 611es,111 Qdwv�a.pry A p I..A Inca list, l u e.A,est lltl l r vnaxe f.1. will µholly J ' leeauintns and ma.Nmel ., u he I l whin p-0mxm was n b lutn-,nr Mrs.impmnlly.n will help I it w __ __•u. ate._, V _,San Diego Union-Tribune Archive Document Page 1 of 5 a (Page B-1 ) Toilet-to-tap plan worries Salk researcher Kathryn Balint STAFF WRITER 18-Oct-1998 Sunday Dave Schubert, a biochemist and Alzheimer's researcher at The Salk Institute, has raised a new concern about San Diego's plans to turn sewage into tap water. He thinks tiny molecules of biotech and medical wastes -- substances whose properties might not even be fully understood by scientists --might be able to slip through the treatment process undetected. "There are hundreds of thousands of these compounds that are put out by the medical research community, biotech firms and hospitals," said Schubert, who serves on Salk's safety committee and knows firsthand about the kinds of wastes that can legally be put down the drain. Neurotoxins and radioactive isotopes, for instance. "The city doesn't have any way of measuring these easily," said Schubert. San Diego proposes to purify sewage water and add it to Colorado River water in the San Vicente Reservoir southeast of Poway. If the project is approved next year by the San Diego City Council, the mix could begin flowing from some San Diegans'faucets in four years. Schubert said he would not be so worried about the project if the sewage came only from households. But much of it flows from northern parts of San Diego, including Sorrento Valley and Torrey Pines, where biotech labs and medical facilities abound. "My point is, you have to consider the source of this water," Schubert said. 'There's not going to be an immediate effect on health, but the long-term effect may be quite significant." .../idoc.cgi7416375+unix+jtappan+ads.uniontrib.com..80+Union-Tribune+Union-Tribune+Librar 10/30/98 V San Diego Union-Tribune Archive Document Page 2 of 5 w San Diego officials, however, say that no matter what contaminants are in the waste water to begin with, they will be removed during five intensive treatment processes. They say their purified sewage water will be even cleaner than the city's present tap water. Paul Gagliardo, manager of the city's sewage purification project, calls Schubert's concerns about biotech and medical wastes "a non-issue" and "totally unwarranted in the grand scheme of things." Even Salk Institute President Tom Pollard has endorsed the city's sewage purification project. Gagliardo says the amount of biotech and medical waste poured down the drain is infinitesimal compared to the 24 million gallons of other wastes flowing daily through the city's northern sewers. "It's basically killed or removed in any of the treatment processes or diluted to a significant degree," he said. Schubert said he is impressed with how conscientious the city waste water officials are. But he is not convinced that all the potentially harmful contaminants can be removed. His position has strong backing from an internationally recognized expert on water quality. Daniel Okun, a retired University of North Carolina environmental engineering professor, has long objected to San Diego's plan to add 18 million gallons of purified sewage water daily to the San Vicente Reservoir. Only one other area in the United States adds purified sewage to a drinking water reservoir: the Upper Occoquan Sewage Authority, which serves the Alexandria, Va., area. That system, which has operated for 20 years, is smaller than what the city of San Diego proposes. Okun points out that new chemicals are being discovered all the time, and that it will be difficult, if not impossible, to tell if they end up in San Diego's drinking water. "There are so many people out there looking for new chemicals, for pharmaceuticals, pesticides and other uses," Okun said. "But there are very few people who are looking for methods of measuring these chemicals in low concentrations of water, and even fewer people looking at how to remove these things from water." While San Diego waste water officials reject Schubert's opinion, they have listened carefully to his argument. City Councilwoman Valerie Stallings arranged for Schubert to meet with them .../idoc.cgi?416375+unix+jtappan+ads.uniontfib.com..80+Union-Tfibune+Union-Tfibune+Librar 10/30/98 aSan Diego Union-Tribune Archive Document Page 3 of 5 u after he wrote to her. Schubert, who has been with Salk for 30 years, knows Stallings from the days when she, too, worked at the private research institute. "If there is any merit to what Dave Schubert is saying, then we need to know about it," said Stallings. She said she is confident the water is safe, but added she has not made up her mind whether the city should go ahead with the$154 million plan. Stallings'confidence in the safety of the treatment system is echoed by Perry McCarty, a Stanford University environmental engineer who directs the Western Region Hazardous Substance Research Center. He headed a panel of scientists that investigated San Diego's plan and deemed it safe. McCarty acknowledges that there are a lot of unknowns in the city's sewers, but says the purification process is designed to deal with them. "It's a very thorough system of barrier after barrier to prevent this sort of thing from getting into the water supply and affecting people," he said. "I know of nothing that's so toxic that it would go through all of these processes and would survive in a reservoir for a year." Under their permits with San Diego, biotech and medical facilities are legally allowed to put small amounts of certain potentially hazardous substances into the sewer system. Schubert said such wastes can be poured directly down the drain or can be rinsed off beakers and other glassware used in research. He also says there is a potential for less ethical companies to discharge prohibited wastes. City officials, however, say San Diego biotech and medical facilities do a good job of adhering to regulations. Even so, Schubert argues that the discharge guidelines were written many years ago, before the advent of biotech industries, and that they were primarily to deal with industrial wastes, such as heavy metals, pesticides and other chemicals. He said the guidelines do not take biotech wastes into account. Schubert became concerned about San Diego's waste water recycling plans when he noticed children playing in reclaimed irrigation water along Torrey Pines Road a couple of months ago. He said there is no telling what medical or biotech wastes may have escaped treatment and may have been present in the reclaimed water. Schubert sees the reclaimed irrigation water as a potential problem in the short run. .../idoc.cgi?416375+unix+jtappan+ads.uniontrib.com..80+Union-Tribune+Union-Tribune+Librar 10/30/98 San Diego Union-Tribune Archive Document Page 4 pf 5 0 "The public has not been informed that this is a potential health hazard," said Schubert, who wants the city to embark on a campaign warning people that state guidelines recommend that people avoid contact with it. Reclaimed water, which is used for irrigation only, is treated much less than the waste water that would be used for drinking. While Schubert focuses on biotech wastes that may enter the sewers, Okun, the water quality expert from North Carolina, is following a new area of potential concern: medications excreted into the sewage system by people taking them. Researchers have detected low doses of medications--everything from birth-control hormones to drugs for heart ailments-- in drinking water in Europe. The effects on people who drink the water are unknown. But Okun said San Diego is increasing the likelihood that such pharmaceutical compounds will end up in its drinking water by using sewage as a water supply. Okun also worries about the potential hazards of estrogenic chemicals, another relatively recent discovery. These chemicals, sometimes called endocrine disrupters, can alter hormonal functions in animals by acting like estrogen. Numerous chemicals, including those in pesticides and plastics, are suspected estrogen mimics. In waters contaminated with such chemicals, male fish have taken on female characteristics. It is unknown how humans react to these chemicals, but some suggest they may be responsible for worldwide reductions in male sperm counts. From the city's viewpoint, neither pharmaceutical compounds or estrogens are a concern. "They're large molecules," said Gagliardo, the city s sewage purification expert. "They're removed by the reverse osmosis treatment and they're oxidized by the chemical processes." Okun, however, goes by the principle that a city should always use its best and purest source of water first. He says San Diego should focus on getting water from farmers in the Imperial Valley and increasing use of reclaimed water for irrigation. By using sewage as its water source, Okun said, "people are going to be obliged to take an added risk that is not necessary." ...fidoc.cgi7416375+unix+jtappan+ads.uniontrib.com..80+Union-Tribune+Union-Tribune+Librar 10/30/98 Fertility via sewers Page ] of 6 MARKE technology HsrtotrnoetPage m AutAc esCEs § m Txsnanxor couNry ruwnca. . Fertility via sewers AGRICULTURE: Treated sludge from Orange ..E :.. County's sewage supplies nutrients to TeoNnubyyFPoompuWo marginal land in outlying counties. Aq riunofMeFU& Edge of Natma El N§b October 25, 1998 Lhoft oennPug. Our Univars. By PHIL GARLINGTON 5oayie. The Orange County Register Thank From Buttonwillow, Kern County On an 80-acre cotton field near this town of 1,600, the sludge semi passes slowly up and down the tilled ground, a conveyor belt on the trailer's floor rolling a black, pungent goo out the back and depositing it in even lines. :u The delivery complete, the driver uses an air compressor to blow away any lingering residue and odor before he points his truck back toward Southern California for another 25-ton load. Within a few hours after the coal-black muck slides onto the field, a tractor towing a disc turns it into the soil. "This pretty much controls the fly problem," says Bill Tracy, a long-time cotton farther and a recent convert to bio-solids, as he tilts back his straw Stetson. "It's darker than steer manure, but organically it's the same." Bureaucrats like to refer to "bio-solids." At the treatment plant this stuff is sometimes called "cake sludge." On Tracy's field it looks like black mayonnaise. You know what it smells like. "It's kind of a musty odor," Tracy says,judiciously. http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/10/25/science/waste025 w.shtml 10/26/98 Fertility via sewers Page 2 of 6 "My wife notices if we use it on a field near the house." Any way you slice it, it's sewer waste, and every year an estimated million tons of it from Southern California toilets are spread on farmlands here in Kern County, some 100,000 tons supplied by the Orange County Sanitation District. It has to go someplace. It's illegal to dump it in the ocean. It's costly to put it in landfills. And plenty of farmers want it. The Orange County Sanitation District spends $4 million annually to hire specialized trucking companies to haul sludge, 25 tons per load, to rural areas in nearby counties, where some farmers use the treated night soil as a nutrient-rich amendment to bring marginal land into production. But Kern County is having second thoughts. Some of the politically powerful agricultural giants here, including the row-crop vegetable growers who produce 70 percent of the nation's fresh carrots, would like to ban sewage sludge completely. They don't want sewer waste anywhere near a carrot crop worth $51 million annually. Although sewage sludge is never allowed on fields that grow human food, and although there is no evidence sludge has caused heath risks, Kem County carrot growers have become worried that pathogens might migrate during floods, or that ground water might become contaminated with heavy metals such as cadmium or arsenic. During floods last winter in eastern Kern, sludge clumps were washed through the streets of the tiny hamlet of Cantil, near Red Rock State Park. "Our biggest problem would be any perception by the public that there is any chance of any kind of E. coli or salmonella organism being detected," said John Guerard, agronomist with Bolthouse Farms, one of the world's biggest carrot producers. "Our business http://www.ocregister.conVarchives/1998/10/25/science/waste025w.shtml 10/26/98 Fertility via sewers Page 3 of 6 could be ruined overnight." Even the public perception that food crops and sludge are close to each other might cause damage to the industry, says Mary Shell, a former Kern County supervisor who is a consultant for vegetable growers opposing sludge. But no health hazards or water contamination from the sludge have been detected so far, says Steve McCalley, director of Kern County's department of environmental health, although there have been nuisance complaints because of odor. McCalley says only 50,000 acres in the county have been approved for sludge, and that there's now a moratorium on new sites until county supervisors approve a new sludge ordinance. "The stuff can smell," McCalley says. "That's part of the reason we're looking at this." Until now, sludge has been spread on Kern County farmland without much regulation. All a farmer needed was a permit from the water quality control district. Tracy successfully uses sludge to revitalize what otherwise would be low-yielding acres that he's planting in cotton and animal feed grains. He says he was skeptical at first but is now convinced the practice poses no danger. "Responsible farmers are good stewards," Tracy says. "We don't want a Love Canal situation. Twenty-five years of research has shown this isn't a problem. But the people on the other side, if they can't argue science, they bring up the bogeyman of perception." Orange County officials are concerned about the sludge dispute in Kern County but say a ban wouldn't create a crisis. Mike Moore, the district's manager of environmental compliance and monitoring, says other counties remain willing to take sludge. But a ban in Kern,which now takes the preponderance of Orange County's sludge, would be inconvenient. http://www.ocregister.conilarchives/i 998/10/25/sciencetwaste025w.shtml 10/26/98 Fertility via sewers Page 4 of 6 "I don't think a ban is going to happen, but we have sites in Riverside and San Diego counties, so we do have flexibility." The main concern, Moore says, is about what would happen if for some reason all outlying counties decided to ban bio-solids. The district would have to use expensive landfills, and ratepayers would see a big hike in their bills. Even if sludge deliveries aren't banned outright, the rules are about to change. Kern County supervisors are now mulling tough new regulations that would include new fees for "generators" such as Orange County to help defray the cost of maintaining Waal roads that are being pounded by rumbling sludge trucks. "The roadbeds were made for the school bus and the pickup truck," Tracy says, "not for big trucks carrying tons of material." The amount the district would pay for for its share of mitigating road damage remains unresolved, Moore says. The OCSD's two treatment plants, which serve 2.2 million people, produce 190,000 wet tons of bio- solids a year. During treatment, the solids are allowed to settle out in ponds; then the resulting cake undergoes "anaerobic digestion and de-watering." But the sludge may still contain bacteria and viruses. Moore said there are about 20 cities trucking sludge to Kern, but Orange County, the city of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County are the big players. Currently, there are eight trucking companies, or "applicators," bringing the black goo to Kern County. Puna Gro Systems is the biggest, and the company that brings the most from Orange County. Pima Gro's Wilson Nolan, whose company is one of three haulers based in Orange County, says hired http://www.ocregister.com/archives/I 998/10/25/science/waste025w.shtml 10/26/98 Fertility via sewers Page 5 of 6 trucks pick up sludge from treatment plants in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. "We take out about 70,000 tons annually," he explains. Two-thirds of that goes to Kem County. "Regulation is an absolutely necessary thing," Nolan says. "We are not resisting. We want that layer of safety and certainly to avoid any risk to the public health and to the environment." Moore emphasizes that the bio-solids are not being dumped in Kern: "The farmers are requesting bio- solids. It's the best way to use this organic material." Cotton farmer Tracy agrees. He says that in a global economy the profit in cotton and cattle feed is so iffy that it doesn't pay to plant marginal, alkaline land if the farmer has to foot the bill for steer manure. "But if(the soil amendment) is free, then bringing these lands into production can be economical." The amount of land brought under cultivation with sludge almost equals the amount of farmland in the county that has been lost to tract houses, Tracy says. And when land is planted it goes on the county's tax rolls. Usually, the goo is turned into the ground within hours, Tracy says. And within days, the farmer is putting in a crop, either cotton or shallow-rooted wheat used for animal feed. Like other farmers, Tracy rotates the crops in his fields, meaning that some land usually is available for taking sludge. "But farming is first," he says. "We take only the amount of bio-solids we can use." Guerard of Bolthouse Farts says only a half-dozen growers in the county have an interest in using the sludge. "A lot of the data is in dispute, but we don't think it's worth the risk to a whole industry," he says. http://www.ocregister.conVarchives/1998/10/25/sciencetwasteO25w.shtm] 10/26/98 Fertility via sewers Page 6 of 6 In any case, says Kern County supervisor Ken Peterson, the days of laissez-faire sludge delivery are over: "We're looking at health, we're looking at roads." The county is going to have the agricultural commissioner document every parcel on which sludge is used, so that the county can notify future buyers. "I don't think we want to outright ban it, but we want to direct the flow and make sure it's properly recycled," Peterson said. "There aren't going to be any (sludge) sand castles out here." /1 ngNgper In Omn/e Gunry,Glibmu egis Gpyri/ht 19ae The Oran/o County RoglNor Fosse aentl comments to ocraolYer�l'nM haetlom com http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/10/25/sciencelwasteO25w.shtml 10/26/98 12 Independent cover Story Thursday,October 15, 1998 Millions of gallons of sewage seep into soil ■Much of the city's 600 miles of underground sewer pipes are - J Outdated and cracking. era �i• :C 'jt, 1 1(A1NlxeN HANn �t'T Huntington Beach City HUNiIN=N BEACH—Imagine 114 - Yazd lom lodtied ga of raw sewage seal to - �. employee the contents of 5.700 average swbmdng 1, s.Sar Jerry Items Ite —seeping into We snit heneath Me 3 ofy's streets. - .: plays a Thus may be,a difhcdt scene to fathom fro F i model of a for the typical resident Yet Mats how much broken sewage eoPs been last smm 1996 And itbase At least 147000 gallons of Me ctys 1•I Y main.The rile water Is lost rp� t I made of every day In the +w t y PLUMBING Downown area alone y. ;7 x'y day pipes, PUGHR sews wdergmund _?�, are 40 se elpeWes that ; r years over do ® are relM1 broken or w severely decked '>r IM1elr tlfe because of old age, etPe<taLlcy' lhbk Iast month, the !f g a60YL City Council approved .11 all, Vie spending$1 mWcas for .h FoRsH or problems tem rewe e emergency sewer th facing Uae Downto n more man dq¢ effort m head off Find- In.,. 's �• q r Y awLan] But Mal E fund /ey Lee your only a Wmd A d n our alms on rs eueh-needed Sy Lm Mallare Hot lneat Wb cot Medy$35N ..-- tend an e- miWon over Me nett These video printouts attest to Me damage the clay pipes have suffered after 80 to 86 din ail s0 years ve money LL ea M1hfick n doesn't have a is bud- years of me m Me Downtown and old town areaz of Huntingdon Beach. eanhlink.nel. get-wnstmined cal- lers But there's sal - -`'erne people believe Me system need- sewage gets everywhere,'he said. per day,he said. Hong even more cis- Ed to be replaced because it was adtlated Pipelinx are aduffier senora concern. The sfmadon's seventy prompted Me inching to city oBinas. Dinner said. Some of Me tltys main sewed problems he City Council a move to approve the$1 mJ- 'We're lasing a large amount of sewage, He said Me matter, now being mrsom- willdn Me Downtown area,where some of bon for emergency repims Downtown. and we don't know where its going,-said gated by Me U.S.abomey's office,isalso Me Wes are Ed years and older.The typical Noble said many of Wove Wes will be Don Noble,maintenance operator;!man- being appealed to Me stale RegWrtal Water We d a pipeline s 50 years,Noble antl. mended using a process called slip Wing, ager for Me HunWglon Beach pubW works Oualty Control Board—Use same agency 'It's gotten to Me point where we are which Involves fiding another fine Inside deparbnent. met Issued Me M.3 notion fine. stand to clean them;said Jerry OIks,a Me broken pipeline and se palling it to lit City officials speculate Me waste water as, Noble said be wouldn't rule ant the Fee- crew leader for Me itys wastewater Me oriented, being absorbed for the most pan by me siblity of sewage reaching We ocean off management Wvsion. 'They-0 fag apart Shp hal wWch carts much less Wan dense soil sunmunding the pipeline. Huntington Beach OR us., replacing me en ire pipeline,adds another However,leakage is just one of any prod- •g sewdge came up mmugh me man. Cracks,breaks and deposit buldups an 70 to 05 years to a We. Iems facie Me city determinating ewer hdeandmenflowed Eomeocean—yez,l Me Insitles Wes mat can't be removed are •Plus we can do it widens tearing up Me 9 N% 9 could happen.•be sdd. pan d what Me public works crews deal world;Noble added. system. The purpose of Me Milk sewersystem is widt when trying to keep Me sewer system Yet pubic works Wicies say me repair It. one xl Wom Win, mat is out of W colts wants water from Exiles,showers working. schedule for Me sewer system needs to be sight out of mind.• Noble sold. 'We don't and sinks,and mangers 1t from homes antl 'when you see a oadl.Its Me dorm- stepped up. Urm Men, Noble said. Me mink about it mW it lads.- businesses to me Orange Comfy Sanhedrin does—Me fine can fail at any manure,- work crews wW do everything they can W WdcbcoddbembemelycostiyInother District treatment facility In Fountain Volley. D'Jks wed.•There are pars IM Me system) keep Me sewer system operaamd. ways. For example. We city of Thousand The system Includes 10,000 ma Wol . where Were asno sewer at all,just a void." Mayor Shhley DenloB said she isproud Oak s was[fired M.3 carbon Wier one of is which workers use todean and repair ROD Noble sold two state-al-)heart cameras of me efforts city stall and me mfmstmchure mainsewer arteries released Ed Indian gel- moss of pipeline and 28 underground Wl We city pardtarad about five years ago help consumes is putting foci to help solve Wis Ion; of cow sewage Into Me never, said stations—mechnism which help W keep keep his Mafl Wowed on me Mate of Me problem,which Is one Mat Effects Me entire Jeffrey DInser,an anomey who remoteness sewage flowing tonedly city'.se er Wes.The cameras,which can udty that city. And Noble said problem Miltrale ail amine any line larger Wan 6Inche In w-The day me waiter commit Win on or He said city officials mainWd Me harsh pans of Me citys sewer system.For exam- diameter,Is what helped me public works me day you flusM1 antl nothing happens,a FJ Nino see mts Wad took place In February pie,abroad ail of We ktt stations have a Ifin- department compile a detailed fiM of Me the day no one will want to live here:she caused Me sewer fine to be washed away, iced storage capacity re troublesome pipeWe,some of which said. 'We want to make sure Mat doesn't dmough others disagree. -which means Mat 9 a backup anus, are Iming up to 6,000 galxe of raw sewage happen.- IMPERILED PARADISE Here are ware trances olsewer •Taulwnmaged.$34,553 •Age:el yeast •gallons,lost pa day 911 %m aLOIX OF pipelines mar irgreryirtMl are an •Number at cracks 37 •Gallons,lost to date:673.874 rM1rOBNMA EErp aeei,irriticaldiontylat Third. M mOIX OF JOUIT AVENUE •NumberafhdecS •W4lmimrtpinf3L>m •lergm:331 feel dledy Wbliawodoefiaab lerrpda 331 her •rrelbm bn pady.2lm •p9s]3yean hem All IM Wwgh tune 19W •Age:70 year •GalMa ant ordale 1.8 ashen mBlO m .NumberolvMs66 •Numbers oal54 -1muca cereFWr.531,9m WANIOORrpVFNUEp11EY •Narria lhow,I 2m KOCN OF AItANFA AVENUE •Numbaaf Mal .Iergdc 315 feet •call trot Per dry:Lay? •terrglM1:317 feet •Began trot per day b 555 O ELM OF .Ron:)Bar es •gallons,on t to deft:971,226 Al 82 year •Gallons lost todaft:395,316 DELAWARE51NEETAUEY •temM0valse2 •saw cast to repin$3;1m •Numbasaall •East coat m repent.13a.200 .Length:327kn •Numbs of hake,1 •Number of deli'0 •Age.20 Kan •(I.E.bin per my,11 •GSllenfoul,rday4,214 And aLOIX OF IM STREET ALLEY •Number of all 54 •Gallen bat to date:511.730 Soure:Huntington Beach •Gallons br to wo:lT millian •Lag0c319fM •Numba all Was:2 •inset con m repeb:53L5m WNicwwksdeparment Thursdo,,Geuther IS 1998 - cover story Indepandem, 13 THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE PROCESS 60-member infrastucture committee gets familiar with needs, looks for funding sources kAm1eEN Hnuev > • Neu l Bds<ommunity' Pb thh volunteers< lun m stall M1oln od tnl the volunteers whet W ith roughly E13 billion needs to be wanted within tr v _ f Huntington Beach worth a winawawe { T jet y p For example during.re<enl needs In Huntington an t! S ;fir monthly meetings committee Beach a key quertlon looms ( ayla Where wW Be.money rome .fie`..5 g �� .t "� members heard eswlpresenla bon on Me condition of Me city's Iro Firstling the answer Is Just sheets The members were fen one of several Items the taken on a tour to zee some of CWsems'lamdeachan Advisory _ the problems firsthand. eddressIng. -`'�' < a Once members become Commineeb Comm4tleadd by Me City harbor with what the needs Council In March.Bds 60-mem- gr - - are, Dysart said the committee bar volunteer group n studying - moves on to the next problem city systems and sWtlures entl uee will make recommended... to // Edward Robison a member the council on how to fund - sir, 1* .,f!','. of the Huntington Beach Mobile Improvements over the next two . Homeowners Association, said decade �„ :-, he barely knew what the word The cracked and broken 'ministucture' meant before sewer goes are one piece of a �' y?. r joining the advisory romminee, very large purzle of items fat I A- But alter viewing the my's need to be repeated and may. woe, .,are. and streets, [.tried, said Chairmen Dick a A. Robison seed he knows exactly Harlow what it means. It•not leak one problem,It's Huntington Beech hi in betl a big problem that deals with _ trouble;he said.'We neverset the entire Inlraunic,ure,' he - b aide money for tangs we need said.'were looking at anything ��_— to have done.' members andcity staRMfM the city owns,' However,Rablaon 4 hopeful structures that make app Jim , Huntington Beach Cigarettes'durinInfirag a to we Advisory Committee members end city alati the people .. y pant can Illy-ouch as streets,medeens, walk past crumbling walls during a low of the Huntington Beach Civic Center reronfy. make a tlBferenre by peN<Ipat- curbs,gutters,sidewalks,block Many city structwers are In disrepair. Ing an the board. walls,pinks and landaapmg- 'I think we're going to have are being examined. het we have.' said Gary waist the infrastructure commit. take a comprehensive look at a lot of good come from this -We need to take care of Dysart, a consultant waisthosed to tee. 'That's why we decided to what's needed to provide ser he said. Saving the city from sewage is not a glamorous job ■If emergency strikes, 12 men a pipc break, whim me fin a Lill .loti.rs I with sewage,k broken alarms which can stand between the city end _ e , d to sewage barking up into peoples waste water spurs. 1 r ,� t es mid Jerry D11m,a crew leader In 1 the slew ter ember. LI<n Cnm fast ldremembers an Instance when Xt3 �s let work pro etl vilel. tlaaMl k' A few years beck a IYAnch main HUNTINGTON BEACH-Theymght �'� ty� lacked and blew up and we had a lOAoot wear pagers instead of capes and light �,. hula of water antler pressure' Bbchfuid wage m lead of vWoms but g a sewage I .,;:kF recalled. 'It was like a fountain' r nif stdkes,these am the menwho .� Burchfield said because the form was so win come Ins the city rescue, p.;:pr strong, pumping water was not possible. The .ewes tleportment'a canna water The department relied on a device similar management division works 24 hours to a large damp. KLir Jay cos. which the .ewe, tines and marine L . 'The renter pump epiUmechanic went on nations. which are underground through m M i�@ topof it he swetl ure the pipe re eteeme i cos to pump the sewage eurough the / toiler and a setl handadd. wrenches to t nctines Add,12-man tam Is so meh I damp 11 ryou, n you There was .unctions, thb 12 men teem Lath rya �j/,1' .ter all over you entl you roWMt think mein We of defense.iti I \ `h beta it because it could be dumping Into hen tangs da qo wrong a comp re- 1 Q the bey and you've got to ronbIn 1, 'setl eyes easier sewer where sewage Is Ma - _, _ _ 'Yaujwtshulyourmaulabetinamthe qa too Ngh and sets all an ela,m Net �- - " _v+a�:. still they!spewing is waste water-hm- nrmmaticeuymia.bilii'wlephone in artlous material;b'echlield said. until a team member,ti reached _ "�•y BbcNleld added fat the division as not e 91 calls the house,entl a blue computer ' q ppetl with heartlous meledel and. :.Ice Wks to you and tells you what's wrong awimnc RrvmLLlsnnmelNofM to M aalheonesusetl by the Fire ike. 'Bddon ell, lea high.' It soon& Huntington Beach employee Les Moore opens Vie entrance to lift sta ion D. Department. may;said[entl eewmen Mark Burchfield. 'They have uniforms, we Jul have Armed with hepetes B and typhoid shots,'BtckWeld seek. :hole and,11 needed.breathing appara[w 'Some ill[ rtellona have a holding B the powergoesouttb tumh Bless BW despite the pads of the job, n pro[eci against polwnous gaau pro cepetlty of 21 hours, be, some have 15 than 3o minuhee to gel It the pmaki Brea Refbun added the[he enjoys the work. laced in sewers, team ,members cosh [o minutes to a hail-hour before 11 starts before sewage can begin Beeping into the 'I love Lt. It's not as glamorous as It nanholes or Bit stations to fir mahunNons dumping: Btrchlleid said. 'So you can't harbor,raw member Rorm Re[hbunsald. sowds,' Refbun said. You Just never -sometimes with only seconds to spare. play mound' Emergency Mrsubom can very Irons know where going to happen- l reared Waste is Barred from Newport Bay Page 1 or News EOJ Pre.Index " co O.C.COMMUNITIES A woman is diagnosed 1 I I wf tt1:A- 11 with it every, minutes . w�sco Thursday, October 15, 1998 Treated Waste Is Barred From Newport Bay ■Environment: Superior Court judge says regional quality control board did not prove benefits of pumping reclaimed water. Opponents feared effects of heavy metals on the salt marsh. By JEFF GOTTL/EB, Times Staff Writer a n Orange County Superior Court judge has told the Irvine 11 RELATED �AjRanch Water District it cannot pump millions of gallons of highly treated waste into Upper Newport Bay. O.C. SECTIONS Mark Wolfe, attorney for Defend the Bay, called the decision a NEWS BY significant step to restore water quality and recreational uses to COMMUNITY Newport Bay. "We have a patient with emphysema and gotten him to stop SPORTS smoking, but we've got a lot of work to restore his health," Wolfe said. PREP SPORTS Judge Robert E. Thomas called "erroneous" the contention of BUSINESS the Regional Water Quality Control Board that the reclaimed water would benefit the bay. LIFE&STYLE The regional water board is considering what to do next and CALENDAR may appeal, said Joanne Schneider, the agency's environmental program manager. CALENDAR Ken Thompson, Irvine Ranch's director of water quality, said in WEEKEND a news release that the district was "surprised and disappointed" at the decision and continued to believe the project was HOME DESIGN "environmentally sound." He said the district board will review its OMMENTARY options. C The ruling is the latest move in the four-year fight by Defend the T.V. TRvtES Bay to prevent the water district from flushing waste into the bay. The district said the project would reduce the amount of nitrogen flowing into the bay from San Diego Creek, decrease by about 15 tons the pollution moving into the bay and enhance the quality of its water. AWERTISEMENT Critics contended the waste water would include dangerous levels of heavy metals, phosphorous and organic materials, encourage the growth of algae and disrupt the fragile ecology of the salt marsh, where at least two species of birds nest and where fish make their home. http://www.metahoUywood.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/OCNEWS/t000093621.htud 10/15/98 Treated Waste is Barred From Newport Bay rage ur . Looking Irvine Ranch's plan called for as much as 5 million gallons daily far an of reclaimed sewage water to be sent through a system of duck apartment? During leading to San Diego Creek and Upper Newport Bay. During the summer, the district planned to send more than 3 million gallons of water daily through the ponds. 5 MOM The environmentalists'fight against the plan began almost as �^ soon as it was proposed, with Defend the Bay taking the lead with a lawsuit. In July 1996, the board allowed the water district, which promoted the project as a way to save customers money on their water bills, to discharge the highly treated sewage into the bay. After protests, Irvine Ranch agreed to sell most of the reclaimed water for irrigation of greenbelts and golf courses instead. Earlier this year, Judge Thomas suspended the water control board's permit, saying it had made procedural errors, and required it to hold another hearing to reconsider the issue. The board approved the plan to send the reclaimed sewage into the bay in April. State law prohibits new discharges into an enclosed bay unless the process provides benefits to the waterway. Both sides brought in scientists to back up their positions. "The question was, Does science show that's the case? Clearly it wasn't," Wolfe said. "That's what we have alleged all along. The discharge was actually going to make it worse." This marks Defend the Bays second victory in the battle over Newport Bay. A previous lawsuit forced the federal Environmental Protection Agency to establish standards limiting the amount of pollutants that could be pumped into the bay. Newport Beach previously had reached an agreement with the Irvine water district that prevented any discharge into the bay until December, and only allowed it if certain weather conditions occurred. It also provided a framework for further negotiations. Newport Beach Mayor Thomas C. Edwards said he was gratified by the Superior Court decision. "It's a great victory," he said. Coovrieht 1998 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: IRV[NE RANCH WATER DISTRICT,ENVIRONMENT—ORANGE COUNTY,COURT RULINGS,WATER POLLUTION, WATER You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. News ao nelndex op http://www.metahollywood.com/liON E/NEWS/ORANGE/OCNEWS/t000093621.html 10/15/98 Road repairs in Kern about halfway complete Filed; October 26, 1998 The Bakersfield Californian Kern County is about halfway through federally funded repairs of roads damaged by the EI Nido flooding last winter. Crews have gradually reopened roads since the mins diminished. About 20 roads remain closed. The Federal Emergency Management Agency three weeks ago gave county officials the go-ahead to do a host of road projects that have been on hold for months,said Craig Pope,roads department director. However,about six large projects estimated at S 100,000 or more are not expected to finish until spring or summer because of the scope of work needed,Pope said.Those larger projects in the works are generally for roads that lave much of the pavement entirely missing,Pope said. Among the more severely damaged roads is Calienm Creek Road.Residents who rely on the road are unhappy with its closure,Pope said. "We have done some patching on the road that is there and got what we call an emergency route,"Pope said. But then cartel trucks started using the closed road and have damaged the emergency repairs,Pope said. Road officials still are trying to figure out what they will do next,Pope said. A carrot truck blocked Calieme Creek on Monday night when it tipped over near Indian Creek Road; nobody was injured.The driver drove off the edge of the mad in a section that is especially narrow because of flood damage. El Nmo left behind some$S million in road damage,Pope said.Of that,the county probably will be on the hook for about$2 million,with the rest coming from federal and state aid.So far all projects have come in on budget. �„ . ..,,."� �.v. .,�......w- ww.c.ay.✓ �wow�ynucuvw �u�renmwu� rtuocaa ragc . w eW5 I+ GO I e index - GO � SCIENCE - NELP.? a y, October 31, 1998 Pilot Program Offers Simplified Permit Process ■ Region: Consolidated application will let South County businesses submit plans to participating agencies, cities. By RICHARD AMROSI, Times Staff Wrdr ocal officials are promising a more efficient process beginning Monday for companies seeking environmental permits in south Orange County. Operating the largest of four pilot programs in the state,the ADvermsrovar Orange County Permit Assistance Center will help businesses in South County save time and money,center director Danian Hopp said. Businesses operating in the South Orange County Permit Consolidation Zone will be able to submit expansion or building plans to as many as 16 state and regional agencies, along with 10 participating cities, through a consolidated application. "In the end,this is an issue of government efficiency," he said. Any business needing permits involving air or water quality, hazardous materials,sewers or biological resources will have the option of using the center, Restaurants,dry cleaners and computer-chip manufacturers are just some of the businesses that need environmental permits. "The beauty of something like this is that as we try to attract new businesses to Orange County,this could make the difference," said Julie Puente,spokesperson for the Orange County Business Council. "It creates a far more friendly business environment." Puente,who said permits now can take up to three years to receive,regards the new zone as a good first step toward reducing red tape. She said the business community still questions the need for certain permits. The pilot program will handle the process for state agencies such as the California Environmental Protection Agency,the Air Resources Board,the Integrated Waste Management Board, and the Department of Fish and Game. Regional agencies taking part in the consolidation include the Southern California Air Quality Management District,the Orange County Environmental Health Division and the Irvine Ranch Water District. The participating cities are:Dana Point,Irvine,Laguna Niguel, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills,Lake Forest,Mission Viejo, San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano and Orange. The center is at Lake Forest City Hall. Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved http://www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra.../aaaa0027G3 e5446&NS-doc-offset=0&NS-adv-search=0 11/2198 ews Go ¢e naex Go IMF' i - m ,i..w ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP Sunday, November 1, 1 Waterways Must Be Protected 13 he hurdles to tampering with natural resources such as Upper Newport Bay are Justifiably high.New RELATED REL secTloNs procedures can produce ill effects that last years or decades. MAIN PAGE Superior Court Judge Robert E. Thomas last month again put the brakes on a plan by the Irvine Ranch Water District to NE WS BY pump millions of gallons of waste water, even after it has been COMMUNITY highly treated, into the bay. SPORTS The water district had won approval for the procedure from the regional water quality control board.But Thomas said the PREP SPORTS district's contention that adding treated water would improve the bay's quality was wrong. BUSINESS An environmental group that formed to battle the plan, LIFE&STYLE Defend the Bay, cheered the judge's decision,Thomas' second rejection of the proposal. Also applauding were the Newport CALENDAR Beach mayor,joggers and walkers along the edge of the quiet waters,and many who worried that the ecologically fragile CALENDAR estuary would be permanently banned. WEEKEND The concern for water quality also should be re-emphasized HOME DESIGN at the Capistrano Beach Water District,although in a very different situation.The Orange County district attorney's office COMMENTARY filed criminal charges last year, alleging that the district ordered its truck drivers to collect sewage sludge and dump it T.V.TIMES on the ground outside a treatment plant at Capistrano Beach. Last month, the district agreed to shut the plant and pay $75,000 in penalties and costs in exchange for having the charges dismissed. The plant is near San Juan Creek,which ArrvvtnsF�FM flows to Doheny State Beach,though prosecutors said they found no evidence that discharged waste entered the creek. The chief plant operator pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of directing district employees to dump the sewage. Newt Charges against the district were dropped,and it admitted no wrongdoing under the deal with prosecutors. The environmental movement has existed long enough and sunk roots sufficiently deep that directors, executives and employees of water districts have to be cognizant of the harm that can be done if operations are not carried out properly. _ Orange County has endured too many sewer line breaks, discharges into waterways and beach closings in recent years. More care is needed to protect the resources that contribute so much to the quality of life. http://www.latimes.cOMIHOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000099317.httnl 11/2/98 ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP'k un ay,November 1, 1998 Top Orange County Races,Where the Leading Candidates Stand in the Contests for Legislative Districts,County and City Offices 2ND DISTRICT SUPERVISORS RACE �Dd nOra An Orange County supervisor for the last four years, RELATED Silva touts his record as a fiscal conservative and leader O.C.SECTIONS who helped the county out of bankruptcy without raising taxes. MAIN PAGE " Political party: Republican " Age: 54 NEWS BY • Residence: Huntington Beach COMMUNITY " Education: Bachelor of science,business, San Jose State SPORTS University, 1966; master's,education,Chapman College, 1974 " Career highlights: Elected to the Huntington Beach City PREP SPORTS Council in 1988 as pm-development for downtown area. Elected to county Board of Supervisors in 1994, a month BUSINESS before the county bankruptcy. LIFE&STYLE " Priorities: Continue support for the El Toro airport. Work on reducing the bankruptcy debt still owed by the county. CALENDAR Oversee a senior citizen help hotline the county will set up soon. CALENDAR WEEKEND DAVE SULLIVAN HOME DESIGN A Huntington Beach councilman for six years, Sullivan launched his campaign as an El Tom airport opponent,thus COMMENTARY garnering thousands of dollars of contributions from South County airport opponents. T.V.TIMES • Political party: Republican Age: 60 • Residence: Huntington Beach " Education: Bachelor of science,biology,Boston College, �vEans�t,+�rr 1959; dentistry degree,Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, 1963; doctor of dental medicine,University of Detroit Dental School, 1966. • Career highlights: Elected to Huntington Beach City i - Council in 1992 as an environmentalist who opposed 1 ' t development of local parks and the beachfront. Opposed police union's attempted salary increases as "pension spiking." ��• • Priorities: Create new majority to oppose development of the El Toro airport. Seek televised board - ^etings. Work on !' land swap with the owners of the Bolsa C:..ca mesa , Coovriaht 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000099349.1.htm1 11/2/98 I ZI O.C. Water Officials y Seek Help U From State L N S J Orange County Water District ' officials we urging the state to N provide more resources to clean Q V up all spills and ban gasoline- powered watercraft on drmkimg- -/' water reservoirs. O t The district's Board of Direc- Ctors voted unanimously this week to approve an ambitious CU G plan to ban the use of a gasoline additive called methyl tertiary •= U do butyl ether (MTBE) within two L m years. The additive gets into the cc — drinking-water supply from aQ. G watercraft using reservoirs. w O The resolution also recom- mends new state legislation to N m pay for MTBE cleanup and to study the health effects of the 3 1 additive. Q The resolution was prompted U IL by the results of a recent MTBE zstudy by the Lawrence Uver- a mine National Laboratory. The C study concluded that MTBE u u more mobile in ground water 0 than other gasoline additives and (QCn is extremely slow to degrade in L. the environment. O 'The results of the study jus- tify immediate action to try to N ban MTBE and get the resources G7 needed to deal with meting ` MTBE contamination in a timely manner;' said Kathryn Barr,the aOrange County Water District n (A director. d y MTBE is a gasoline additive C that enhances co ihustiaq re- m suiting in improved air quality. E C —J"GN HANDEL z Q N O J Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times Ra-144. LAWSUIT: O.C. Loses Ruling • Continued from CI some of its theories,"said aopokea- O Closes Key Ruling I to comment. woman, Leah Johnson. "ar are • • Also unaffected are several t pleased and believe t Pinar ruling firer setthat have be with Wall Street will ainnenu sther Standard Beals co." • I firma that have been signed but Michael Dmn Rauacher officials couldn't In Bankruptcy Cases Yet announced, J. county. reached. Hannigan,a lawyer for re county. Hannigan, the 't overlook lawyer. He said those deals will bring the said Taylor didn't overlook any focal recovery to about 190 million important issues In ruling against I for the county and special echoolnvies the"We've ■ COartR:Judge lain ex-Treasurer However Millie Citron may have been that low cities monand n the financial "We've reviewed the the judge Citron had I in 4intere t billions"there dollars to bet on that le. money In the financial he said."It appears to d the Judge anal authority to low interest tales,"rare was authority to debacle. hoe carefully considered all of the invest.Decision has no ether[on act, Taylor wrote.Even"grave errors"In The judge-9 ruling came on a arguments. And although we dis- exerclsing that authority are not prohibited motion made by one of the Wall agree with the outcome, we are legal settlements already reached. by law,he ruled. Sheet firma named in the county's pleased with the level of deliber- Counly lawyers Bald they probably will lawsuits, FuJI Securities Inc., a atlon." By E SCOTr RECKARD appeal the ruling, which negates suits subsidiary of Japan's Full Bank Hennlgan said the county will trees mArr WRlifa agalnet more than a dozen Wall Street Ltd. ask Taylor to allow an immediate' In a decision that severe) limits Orange firms that did business with Citron. With Taylor's ruling leaves Orange appeal of the issue of Diemen legal Y 6 no evidence thine firms realized the rinks County with only a minor claim authority. If the judge refuses, an County'e chances to recover more bank- the treasurer was running,the theory that against Fuji: that the firm de- appeal would have to wait until mptcy lasses,a judge ruled Thursday that Citron exceeded his authority was the frauded it of E0 million to$10 mil- after we minor claim against Fuji Is former county Treasurer Robert L.Citron county's sole cause of sell on against them. lion when It liquidated securities tried,he said. had legal authority to make the high-risk County lawyers have said privately that held as collateral for loans to The defendants claim the bond mvestmenuffhat caused the debacle. they had hoped to recoup mare ran Citron In December 1994. county's loan actually In about In lawsuits against former brokers and $1 billion of the county's 11 an. Fuji's lawyer, Milwaukee attor- t900 million—the$1.94-billion lase other professionals, the county contended The decision has no effect on the ney Nancy J. Sennett, couldn't be minus the huge extra earnings that the Investments vitiated the California $739 milafin in legal settlements already reachedlorcomment. Citrorl'a inves0nenta yielded in the Constitution and state laws.It argued that agreed to by a number of major defendants, Taylor's ruling notwithstanding, yearn before his bete came up Citron was never authorized to take such notably $437 million from the counly'e the county con proceed with law- loners. rlaks—end that the defendants therefore former chief investment house, Merrill suits against Standard & poor', Especially when considered most repay the entire $1.64 billion lost in Lynch&Co. Inc.,which gave county municipal against the lower loan figure, the December 1994. Merrill Lynch settled the case rather bonds lop ratings before the bank- $770 mutton recovered so far bl That contention was thrown out by U.S. than risk an unfavorable ruling on re issue ruptcy,and against Vain Rouscher much more.than most experts be- 'strict Judge Cary L Taylor,in a 38-page of Citron a authority—a decision that now Inc., which advised the county on lieved Orange County would ruling that the counly'n own lawyers called seems unfortunate for the big Wall Street Issuing those bonds. achieve. And the legal contention comprehensive on the legal Issues In- firm.A Merrill Lynch spokesman declined Standard&Poor's applauded the that Citron exceeded big authority, volved. Pleme see LAWSUIT CS ruling, however, noting that It even if treated out In the end, was negates a part of the county law- the major motivator for the settle- suit that contended the land rat- ments,Reclusion mid. Inge agency should have warned "U we were never right about that Citron was pursuing an Illegal this;' he said,"then it just goes to course of action. show, as Paul Newman once said, "The court appears to recognize sometimes nothing is a real cool .that the county her overreached In hand." COLUMN UNL: Knee-Veep lllsputes IOr <b>Wateryb><b>tSunaloesv1)> rage 1 01 y Omla - r{p _+ GO • ;m,tt NEIGHBORHOOD NEWS HELP Sunday,November 1, 1999 SUNUAY REPORT Knee-Deep Disputes for 'Water Buffaloes' ■The power of the Metropolitan Water District long went unquestioned. Now it is mired in inertia,ineptitude. By TERRYAfCDERMOTT, Times Staff Writer Inhe last water buffalo in the lower Colorado River basin grazes in the low green vegetation.The last buffalo in the lower basin is unhappy.The buffalo's days are numbered, and he knows it. Aoveart EMEW He edges through the burnt brown grains,pushing rejects aside, burrowing on. He doesn't have time for croutons. He came for the crab. Charles"Chick" Barker is eating lunch, a crab Caesar,at a waterside restaurant in San Pedro. Asked to look back at his life,he looks instead out the window and stares there a while. "You don't really want to hear this crap,do you?" he asks, then starts talking about a time in California when the challenges were clear and the means to meet them apparent. Barker is the longest-serving member of the board of directors of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California He's been on the board for half its existence, 35 years. "He did that," another board member says,"and I went to kindergarten." The Metropolitan,or the Met,as it is often called, is a confederation of 27 cities and local water districts that stretches from Santa Barbara to Mexico.It has,since shortly after its founding in 1928,been the main importer of water to semiarid Southern California For most of its history,the Met acted as a potent shadow government, shaping the region. It was one of those rare public institutions whose enemies and defenders agreed on what it was: a powerful,impenetrable and arrogant monolith that did as it pleased. The Met found water and built whatever it felt necessary to deliver it—huge dams,vast networks of canals,pumps and pipelines. Water,Met people like to say,is free. Moving it costs money.No project was too big or costly.The Met engineered solutions. Barker represents the last of an era of water overlords who, owing to a shared sense of purpose and access to economic might,ran this water business pretty much as they saw fit. Critics called them the"Water Buffaloes," a slight intended to demean then thickheaded,eyes-down,perpetually plodding approach. Barker takes the name with pride. Plodding is a good thing,he thinks,if you know where you're going.And boy,did the buffaloes know where they were going:To get water,ever and always,to get more water.No matter what anyone said about the impracticality of getting more,the impossibility of getting more,or even the immorality of getting more,they http://www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra../aaaa0000T3df696&NSdocoffset=0&NS-adv-search=0 111!2/98 t-VLUMIN urVh: &nee-ucep 111sputes ror <DY W ater4o><O>t$UliaioesV[) rage L of Y went and got more. The result is Southern California. The Met's power to acquire the area's water supplies underwrote—some would say dictated—its stupendous growth. Critics deride the accompanying amorphous sprawl. Defenders praise the creation of the eighth-largest industrial economy in the world and the realization of the American Dream for millions. Things are different today. There is no more water for the Met to go get. The main problem in the water world is dividing a shrinking supply among more people. Environmental and population pressures are growing. More people and less water mean more fights: farm against city,north against south, Arizona against California. These are largely political,not physical challenges.And the Meta political skills seem to have atrophied.Its inclinations are still those of the old buffaloes and their engineers. The Met is still at the center of regional water politics. It hasn't shrunk.But it has become a clumsy giant, Gulliver among the Lilliputians. Who cares? Southern California prospered because of the Met's ability to deliver as much cheap water as anybody wanted. A less able Met could mean higher prices. It could mean less water. It would mean,almost inevitably,less growth. A Ditch That Supports 16 Million People If you're a stranger here--if, say,your idea of what constitutes majesty in a waterway derives from the mile-wide might of the Mississippi or the slippery mysteries of the Columbia River Gorge—then your awe of ditches might be insufficient. Take this ditch. From on high,it has some beauty;a shiny line of pure,straight-arrow angularity,a bright rope pulled taut across the random warp of the desert floor. But the beauty is all distant geometry. Up close,every hint of it disappears. It's a ditch,after all,a silver gray concrete culvert;a small,plain thing,maybe 40 feet wide. You could spit across it. This ditch is,however,distinguished in significant ways. For one thing, it is the only apparent artificial structure on the dead brown ground of eastern Riverside County. For another, it is full of water,a swift stream of it moving west. It is in the middle of a desert.The temperature boils above 120 degrees.It hasn't rained in months.And the ditch is full of water, flowing at 1,700 cubic feet per second. Finally,this ditch,unlike most others,has a name: the Colorado River Aqueduct.The economic well-being and,in some cases,physical survival of 16 million people depend on it. This ditch is water grandeur, California style. Water here is among the most domesticated natural resources on the planet. It is a measure of its domesticity that if any water does eventually make it to the ocean,water people routinely describe it as having been spilled. This ditch was built to prevent that from happening. Building it required brute force. Dreaming it was crazy. Imagine Los Angeles of the 1920s.The city government has http://www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra.../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-doc-offsets&NS-adv-search=0 11/2/98 CULUMN UNL:knee-Deep Disputes lot '<b>Wao:r</U><b>r3urtaloesyb> rage oIY already completed the Los Angeles Aqueduct,bringing water to the city from the Owens Valley. The place is awash in water. There is no obvious need to import more of it Enormous Gamble in Depression Years It took a quarter-billion dollars,real money even by today's standards,and an almost unimaginable sum when voters approved spending it in the Depression. Given the circumstances,the Colorado Aqueduct was an enormous gamble.It paid off.The aqueduct carries one-third of the water supply for Southern California 300 miles over mountains, under mountains,under roads,over deserts from the Colorado River to the sea The Los Angeles Aqueduct built Los Angeles. The Colorado Aqueduct built the rest of Souther California, fueling one of the greatest,most prolonged economic booms in human history,enabling among other things the creation of drive-in hamburger stands,the de-centered city and the technical prowess to win the Cold War. The aqueduct remains the Met's defining achievement. It set the agency on the way to becoming the country's largest water wholesaler.One of every 20 Americans is a customer. That's more customers than all but three states have people. The grand conceit of the aqueduct infused the Met with a self- confidence,blurring into hubris,that is so deep it now seems genetic.Even now,the agency is building a$2-billion reservoir in Riverside County. The place is utterly devoid of water to put in the reservoir,so the Met is also building a billion-dollar pipeline to fill it with water from up north. Southern California imports about two-thirds of its water. About half the imports come from Northern California by way of the State Water Project and the Los Angeles Aqueduct.About half comes from the Colorado River via the aqueduct.In the last decade,both these sources have been reduced. Growing environmental concerns and political power essentially halved the water available from the north. Growing populations and political power in the other states of the Colorado River basin,notably Arizona,have forced California to agree to take much.less water from the Colorado. These tightened supplies have forced Southern California to manage its water use,rather than simply tum the spigot and let growth pour out. Water creates its own impetus for growth by removing an otherwise unremovable constraint.If you have water, and land, the capacity for growth is limited mainly by the political will to stop it,which,if you look over the huge expanse that is contemporary Los Angeles,has been no match,so far,for the water buffaloes. When Plenty of Water Meant Endless Growth One morning in 1954,Chick Barker was sitting at his desk in the operations office of the Chevron oil refinery in El Segundo. His boss,Don Harger,walked in and,in the manner of a boss in 1954,gave an order. "Barker," he said,"get interested in the water business." Barker,in the manner of an employee in 1954,didn't discuss or argue or ask why.Chick Barker is a pragmatic man,not much http://www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra../aaaa0000T3df6%&NSdocoffset=O&NS-adv-searches 11/2/98 UULUMN UNIT: Knee-Deep Disputes tor'<b>WaterVb><b>Buttaioes</b>' Page 4 of 9 intrigued by questions that start with the word "why." Besides, he already knew why.Next to the raw petroleum,water is the single most critical element in refining oil,a process that involves repeated heating and cooling. On average, it takes five gallons of water to produce a gallon of oil. If nothing else,then, Barker understood the importance of water to the oil industry. Water,usually,works like this: You turn the tap,it comes out. But a complex assemblage as much political as mechanical underlies the simple turning of every tap. California has a lot of water and a lot of people.The problem is,they're in different places. Almost all of the complications and,not coincidentally, costs in the water business derive from this basic imbalance. The water world that has evolved to address the imbalance is a confusing place if only by the sheer number of players in it. in Southern California alone,more than 300 public or private water companies have some portion of the water business. Beyond that lies Sacramento and Washington,which are,with water as with much else, virtual festivals of further complication. Oilman Becomes a Water Man This was the thicket Chick Barker got tangled in. For a certain type,this can be a pleasing experience. Barker was the type. While not much interested in whys, Barker is an intuitive expert at how. He has a gift for reducing complex situations to their basics. He knows how to make things work. When,for example,pickets from a longshoremen's strike halted shipments of supplies and people to the refinery,Barker, figuring there were no picket lines at sea,commandeered a surplus landing craft and ferried materials and men directly to the refinery. So when his boss gave the order,Barker loyally went out and got interested in the water business. Very interested, as it turned out. In short order,he got involved in his local water district and in 1963 was appointed to represent it on the Metropolitan. When Barker went on the board,the directors were all white, all men. Metropolitan directors in those days served what amounted to life terms. They came mainly from three places-- real estate,the water business and industry. They presided as a modem version of knights of the round table, each of the 27 districts a fiefdom. (The number of directors varies over time, according to a formula based on assessed value of real estate in each of the areas. For example,there are currently 51 Met directors;Los Angeles has seven, San Diego six, Orange County five and so on down to San Marino's one.) Even given their great number and greater differences among the areas they represented,directors had in those days a shared sense of purpose:to get and sell ever more water, enabling perpetual growth. They saw themselves as unsung igniters of a great explosion of prosperity. Ruling the District With an Iron Fist "We didn't feel it was self-serving in those days," says Thornton Ibbetson,a land developer who served on the Met board for parts of four decades with Barker. "It was for the development of California. We didn't see any conflict. Who httpd/www.latimes.con/sbin/iawm.../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-doc-offset=0&NS-adv-searches 11/2/98 gULUMN UNE: &nee-Veep Disputes Tor'<b>WaterV b><b>Buttaloesvb>' Page.,)of Y knows more about growth than developers?" The Met then was dominated by a series of strong leaders. When Barkerjoined the board,the most legendary of those leaders was at the peak of his power. Joe Jensen,an oilman from Los Angeles,headed the board for 25 years beginning in 1949. Jensen made the Met his job. And he made it clear it was his alone. He patrolled the district in a chauffeured car and didn't hesitate to tell everyone from engineers to local water board directors how to do theirjobs. Back at headquarters,he was equally forceful in setting the district agenda. Discussions within the board were rare. If you didn't agree,you didn't speak. Even if you did agree,you didn'tspeak up until you had been there for a while. Jensen didn't give up the chairmanship until he died in 1974, immediately after which the board amended its rules to limit future chairmen to two terms. The effect of this has been to transfer power from the board to the agency staff.No one took fuller advantage of this than Carl Boronkay,general manager from 1984 to 1993. "Carl Boronkay ran the place with an iron fist. If you wanted to sell something to MWD,I don't care if it was a pencil,you had to talk to Carl," said Ralph Menvielle,a member of the board of directors of the Imperial Irrigation District. Boronkay,who characterizes his reign as simply that of a corporate CEO,dragged the district into the modem world. The Penpheral Canal, a favored project of the Met that would have brought water from the northern Sierra,around the Sacramento River Delta and eventually to Southern California,had been defeated.Boronkay recognized the growing political power of the environmental movement and tried to make common cause. He often did this to the complete surprise—and sometimes shock--of the board of directors. Management Changes at a Complex Time Boronkay eventually accumulated too many enemies on the board and resigned as a forceful new board chairman, Mike Gage,was taking charge. Boronkay's replacement was a more conciliatory professional water manager from Florida,Woody Wodraska. With Gage as the external leader, Wodraska looked inward. The organization had run pretty much on its own while Boronkay was off politicking in Sacramento and Washington. The separate departments functioned with almost complete autonomy from one another. "We called them silos," Wodraska said,and he concentrated on breaking them down. Meanwhile, Gage,an appointee of Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley,was ousted when Richard Riordan took office.The chairmanship passed to Jack Foley,an amiable grandfather who was spending his Army retirement managing the tiny Laguna Niguel water and sewer district.("I'd like to get rid of the sewer.Nobody wants to take it," he said.) Foley is a sharp-nosed, bushy-browed,almost impish Irishman from Brooklyn. He winks and will say of a woman he's had some dealings with, "She's a tough broad." He has not been, all agree,a forceful chairman. Katherine Moret,a Met director from Los Angeles, said: "God http://www.latimes.con/sbin/iawra.../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-doc-offsets&NS-adv-search=0 11/2/98 CULUMN UNIT: tSnee Lleep Disputes for'<b>W ater</b><b>t3u1ta1oes<1b>' Page b of 9 bless Jack Foley,he's a nice man,but he's not a leader." Meanwhile,the world beyond Met's walls came pouring in. Wodraska now admits he was unprepared for the complexity of California politics and paid it too little attention. In the description of one director: "We've got two peacetime generals and we're in the middle of a war." "Here's the history of California water in 100 words or less," said Tim Quinn,deputy director of the Met. "We used to think that the way to solve any problem was to build something big. Then came the Peripheral Canal." The defeat of the canal in 1982 signaled the end of the Met's unchallenged autonomy over water and the new power and persistence of the environmental movement.Moreover,the courts seemed eager to support the environmentalists' persistence. Other changes, including modest broadening of the board's membership, came from within. But with only slight compromises,the Met in many areas did a pretty good job of pretending the world was the same as it had always been. Then in 1995 the Metropolitan finally met an opponent it couldn't ignore or conquer: itself. The consensus that had propelled the board for decades disappeared entirely,beginning in a protracted, corrosive fight over an important but relatively straightforward issue:whether to allow one of the 27 member agencies,the San Diego County Water Authority,to purchase its own supply of water. Not only would this challenge the Met's monopoly as the region's water importer, it would cost money because San Diego is the Mefs biggest customer.The Met's revenues are overwhelmingly derived from selling water,which creates a sticky contradiction with the district's efforts to encourage conservation and diversification of water sources. But the substance of the dispute quickly ceased to be the main issue.Name-calling and exaggeration replaced debate. The San Diego delegates to the Met were extraordinarily strong-willed and unrelenting. The rest of the Met board, in time-honored fashion,hunkered down to outwait them. The debate devolved into bitter personal feuds complete with civic insults. Los Angeles representatives delighted in sarcastically dismissing San Diego as a Podunk one-horse town (or,the modem equivalent,a one-runway town), and began concerted misinformation campaigns. San Diegans persisted in saying,falsely,that the Met board had singled them out for deep cuts in water supplies during the drought of the early 1990s. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent trying to discredit each other. Clandestine meetings were held in both camps. Public meetings of the Met board became a farce. San Diego began bringing its own recording equipment to board meetings, as if saying the Met couldn't be trusted not to doctor the record of its own meetings. Every issue--it didn't matter if it was water quality or building a dam--somehow led back to San Diego's complaints,which,though exaggerated,were genuine. Met lawyers began requiring San Diego board members— representatives of the Mefs biggest customer--to file public information act requests to get data from the district. Feud Calls Public Attention to Agency http://www.latimes.comisbin/iawra.../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-doc-offset=0&NS-adv-search=o 11/2/98 COLUMN ONE: Knee-Deep Utsputes Ior'<tvWatervb>�Ivriuttaloesvb> rage 1 ur Y "Met failed to keep its best customer happy," said Christine Frahm,chairwoman of the San Diego board. "That's what it came down to. So we looked elsewhere." The feud eventually called attention to the agency in a way that its great past successes never had. The agency did not know how to react Family secrets were being aired in public. A powerful state senator spent much of the recent legislative session railing against the Met as"a ghost organization, arrogant and utterly lacking in accountability."U.S. Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt recently characterized Southern California water politics as being in"disarray." The uncertainty increased this fall with the sudden resignation of Wodracka,the Met's chief executive.Foley is also due to step down as chairman at the end of the year. The underlying issue in the San Diego dispute has implications far beyond the Metropolitan: Should water be deregulated? Should it follow telephones and electricity into the vagaries of the free market?Water has always been regarded as a natural resource to be protected and distributed by the government. Should it instead become a commodity to be bought and sold in the market like so many frozen pork bellies? This,critics say,is what the Metropolitan Board of Directors should have spent the last three years deciding. Instead,they were not discussing much of anything.They were stranded on opposite shores of indecision—calling one another names. Chick Barker is a compact man who,at 83,retains a boxers round, sloping shoulders. He has thick forearms and fingers. Even with a stride foreshortened by age,he walks like he knows where his Rockport are taking him.He wears double hearing aids,double-thick glasses and short-sleeved shirts, the pockets stuffed full of pens,pads and scraps of paper. He has a rough,florid face and a nearly full head of hair. He is the kind of man who will kiss a lady's hand.He's the kind of man,in fact, who will kiss a woman's hand even when he doesn't think she's a lady.It's an old-fashioned sense of doing what you're supposed to do that still runs deep at the Metropolitan. Met board meetings are like family gatherings in a stem great aunt's parlor. They serve chocolate chip cookies and no one speaks out of turn. "It's like a movie going on for years and years. You could leave the room for a month,come back and not have missed a frame," said David Freeman,the general manager of the city of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power who joined the Met board this year. Freeman has spent much of a 50-year career in the utility business,most prominently as manager of the Tennessee Valley Authority. In other words,he has credentials. Yet when he raised questions at his first board meeting he was taken aside by a veteran director and,in time- honored Met fashion,was counseled to wait a couple of years before speaking again. For all the changes on the board in recent years,a Met meeting still looks like Thursday night at the Fullerton Elks. Met people look like what people everywhere would look like if they attended a lot of these meetings,ate a lot of those cookies and the Staimtaster hadn't yet been invented. http://www.ladmes.com/sbin/iawra.../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-docoffset=O&NS-adv-searches 11/2/98 COLUMN ONE.: Knee-lleep Llsputes I0r'<b>water<Jb> <1o>1$u11a1oesV b> rage a ut 9 This combination of homeyness and reserve, many Met directors say,makes for a friendly but ineffectual board that refuses to acknowledge the world has changed, like the Kremlin during the last days of the Soviet Union. "Real policy questions like 'What are we supposed to be doing here.?haven't been asked," said Bill Luddy, a Los Angeles director. "The world has changed," said director John Moms of San Marino. "You must recognize you need to.IMn'tjust stand in the middle of the road. You keep getting run over." Water,in the West, is destiny,and the water future of the region is being decided right now. People talk seriously of letting old government monopolies like the Met die,replaced by open water markets with buyers and sellers bidding to see who gets how much. The Met seems frozen in place,hampered by its history and unwilling to acknowledge the changing world. Longtime critics have mistaken its inaction for the Met's old arrogance and have stepped up their attacks. Even old Met allies are chiming in. But much of the criticism is aimed at an organization that in some sense no longer exists. Sin of Ineptitude Replaces Arrogance The Metropolitan, long accused of running roughshod over all opposition, is today guilty,even its advocates say,of an almost unimaginable sin: ineptitude. Barker has watched the decline in horror.He says he had always agreed with what a wise man--a taxi driver in Las Vegas—told him: "Water's so goddamned important, 1 know somebody's going to take care of it."Now,Barker says, "We're in a very serious situation, as serious as I've ever seen. I'm not so sure who's going to take care of anything." The Met meetings are somber affairs conducted under the pall of gentlemen's club courtesies in rented space in a downtown high-rise. A new headquarters next to Union Station is due to open this fall. Typical of the agency's imperiousness,according to two Met staffers,board members initially did not want anyone to know they had voted to build it. Also typical of the agency,the most heated board debate regarding the new building was where to build a special restroom for the board. Meetings always open with a prayer, usually written by a board member. One recent example asked that Southern Californians be able to "fill their cups from an ever-full aqueduct" Another sought to "open the intake valves of our hearts" so that its internal divisions could heal. Every director has a laptop at his or her position. At a recent meeting,one director played solitaire on his.Another member said he and his next-seat neighbor play a game during meetings—they bet on how many board members will fall asleep. The record so far is 11. When people in the water world today survey the turmoil around them,they frequently refer to "Chinatown,"the shadowy movie that depicted the first great Southern California water war. Its the wrong movie. There are few shadows in the new water world. Everything is battered by the cruel bright light of a desert noon. httpJ/www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-doc-offset=0&NS-adv-seareh=o 11/2/98 (:OLUMN ONE: Knee-Deep Disputes tbr'<W Water<lb><b>ButkaloesV b>' Page 9 of v If you insist on a movie metaphor,you would do better to search for one of those safari films in which a rogue elephant terrorizes hapless villages,trampling through them heedless of the damage strewn in its wake.The Great White Hunters set off to trap the rogue. But the plan backfires,and in the climactic scene,the angry beast makes one last charge right at the hunters.They shoot to kill. They let fly round after round and the elephant finally goes down. It falls with a thunderous cartoon crash,hitting the ground with such force that all the twigs,rocks, leaves,small animals and large men on the jungle floor are tossed up into the air,where they hang,suspended. That's the shape of the water world today. Shots have been fired.The elephants, and their friends the water buffaloes, have crashed to earth. Everything else is still up in the air. Next: Directors of the Met increasingly pursue personal agendas. ♦ rr Water,Water From Everywhere The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is the biggest water wholesaler in the nation,stretching from Ventura County to Mexico and serving 16 million people. Two-thirds of the region's water is imported via three canal systems--the Colorado River Aqueduct,the Los Angeles Aqueduct and the State Water Project. �1Corrvriuht 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved O Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT,WATER--SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,WATER--NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER RIGHTS,BOARDS OF DIRECTORS CHARLES(CHICK)BARKER. You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. PF[VICVE""CX EEGRC.REEuLTS 66LPCX PYNEL XEITMYTCM http://www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra.../aaaa0000T3 df696&NS-doe-offset=0&NS-adv-search=0 11/2/98 O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 1 of S community r �oRme PaOe � 1•J'.y rA ROKEAiveu� . M T t CAANGF lfNNfY RPG61C1! LI:.�i11:.1� Outside Orange County MARK RIOHTMIRE?M Orange Lounly Bear her Register ril ,Ich Obilrurlet OPEN SPACE:This was the view in from Yorba Linda toward Anaheim Hills and the new Eastern Transportation r lei Corridor,just opened. O.C. residents favor slower growth POLL: A Register survey finds split views on whether the county has grown too much. T,�� November 1, 1998 HOW POLL WAS By PETER LARSEN DONE The Orange County Register The Orange County A large majority—73 percent Register Poll was — of Orange County residents conducted by Richard Hertz Consulting. The say more limits are needed to poll is based on manage new development random telephone expected over the next two interviews of 503 eX P county residents from decades, according to a new Sept.22 to Oct. 1. It Orange County Register poll. has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.7 Even more people— 83 percent percent. — said they would support limits on economic and population growth in Orange County to set aside land as permanent open space. "Our area right now is a disaster," said Helen Ostoich, 67, a resident of Coto De Caza unhappy with the pace of development in new communities around her. "They're just building everywhere." She favors stronger limits on development, but admits http://www.ocregister.com/archives/I998/1l/Ol/community/po11001w.shtml 11/3/98 O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 2 of 8 they might be tough to achieve. "I caret imagine what you can do to stop it in Orange County," Ostoich said. "Orange County is a very popular place." The Register poll surveyed residents on a wide range of issues related to growth: their assessment of previous development and mistakes that were made in the past, their concerns about future growth, and the possibility that some might move out of the county because of concerns over the increasing crowds and congestion. The poll found: . Disagreement between those who believe growth has been balanced with concerns such as community character and open space, and those who believe development has overwhelmed other interests: 49 percent said it has been balanced, while 41 percent said there has been too much growth. . Concerns that the county is growing so large it is becoming unliveable: 34 percent said they might move because of growth concerns. . Optimism for the future: 80 percent said they believe growth can be successfully balanced. Between now and 2020, based on current economic expectations, Orange County is expected to experience a massive building boom, according to an extensive review by the Register of county and city planning documents. Millions of square feet of office space and 219,000 new homes will cover an estimated 110,000 acres of — for now— undeveloped land. The county will gain another 577,000 residents and 746,000 jobs. That volume of growth continues to fuel a long- standing debate by residents over the impact of growth on Orange County. http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/11/01/community/po11001 w.shtml 11/3/98 O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 3 of 8 "There's a legitimate debate, a basic split, over whether there was too much growth too fast, or whether there was a good balance," said Richard Hertz, director of the poll. "But even the people who feel there's been a good balance between development and protecting community character are saying that in the future you need to be more conscious of making the impacts not as large," he said. GROWTH: GOOD OR BAD? In several questions, the poll asked residents to evaluate the growth of Orange County from the past to the present. How well had the county balanced competing concerns: economic growth,jobs and housing vs. community character, open space and freely flowing traffic? The overall results found a narrow split: 49 percent saw balanced growth, 41 percent saw a bias toward growth. Viewed from different angles, the numbers offered further insight into the way Orange County feels about growth: . Residents in the north part of the county were more likely to see growth as good than those in the south: 50 percent of those in the north said growth was balanced, compared with 44 percent in the south. . Young people— 30 or younger— saw development more favorably than older residents: 64 percent younger than 30 said there was a good balance, compared with only 39 percent of those ages 30 to 45. . Hispanics also were more likely to see development as a plus than any other ethnic group: 57 percent said it was balanced, compared with 44 percent for whites. http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/11/01/community/po11001 w.shtml 11/3/98 O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 4 of 8 . Oldtimers were more negative about growth than newcomers: 57 percent of those who have lived here 25 years or more said growth was overwhelming, while only 29 percent of those who have lived here five years or less said there was too much growth. In explaining their points of view, many pointed to the master-planned cities and communities of Orange County as examples of the good and the bad sides of development. "I think in south county they've done it in a pretty nice way," said Sharon Logan, 51, of Anaheim, who believes that growth has been balanced. "There are ways to do it to deal with the numbers of people who need houses and jobs and not have that closed-in feeling," she said. "As a general rule, I think things are going fine," said Richard Ortiz, 52, who, like Logan, believes growth has been balanced. He moved to Irvine two months ago, after 20 years in Garden Grove. In his new city, he senses that city planners have tried to ensure that it grows into a liveable city. "For Irvine, I think the development of the homes was done nicely," he said. "And we do have lots of parks." Yet others see those same tidy streets and neighborhoods as the bad side of growth—places that evolved in an orderly fashion, but without the sense of character or community found in older cities. "In Irvine, the way the neighborhoods were so well planned you get lost," said Mary Galagar, 25, of Yorba Linda. "You feel like you're in a maze. You travel down these long avenues, but you're not anywhere. It's all the same." The south and east parts of the county are the areas were the most growth is expected over the next http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/1 I/0l/community/poll001 w.shtml 11/3/98 O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 5 of 8 decade, given current economic indicators, according to planning documents. For Ostoich, who believes there is too much growth in the county, that means more roads and buildings to fill the hills and valleys around her Coto de Caza home. "When we bought here, we were told they couldn't build on the ridge," she said. "Well, now they're building on the ridge. "I can't believe the change in eight years. I'm shocked." GROWTH MISTAKES? The Register poll also asked residents to list examples of mistakes made in Orange County development in the past — or things that could be done to improve the quality of life in the future. Most listed four topics: roads and traffic congestion, 27 percent; developed too fast, 25 percent; development poorly planned and lack of open space, both 15 percent. "Traffic is the daily social indicator of growth in a region," said Mark Baldassare, a professor of urban and regional planning at the University of California, Irvine, and director of the Orange County Annual Survey. " 'Is it more or less congested than it was a year ago? And what are we doing about the infrastructure to cope with the growth and development that's taking place?' "This is how most people experience the growth of a region and make an assessment about whether a region has grown too fast or too big," he said. Even those who indicated they believe that growth is balanced said traffic is a problem. http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/1 I/Ol/community/po11001 w.shtrnl 11/3/98 O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 6 of 8 "I get absolutely frustrated when it takes 45 minutes to an hour to get to work," said Stephanie Ernster, 33, who commutes from Fullerton to the Santa Ana civic center. "I know they're making improvements on the freeway, but it's every freeway that's congested," she said. "Now it's gone to surface streets." Ostoich said she tries to time her trips to miss the crowds at the gates to Coto de Cana and on surface streets in neighboring communities such as Rancho Santa Margarita. "You just have to know when to get out and when not to," she said. "That's what happens when you build like crazy." Sheila Czajkowski, 46, of Fountain Valley mentioned traffic— but also the rapid pace of development and the loss of open space — as mistakes made in Orange County. She talked wistfully of how Pacific Coast Highway between Newport Beach and Laguna Beach once offered beautiful views of undeveloped coastal hillsides. "That was really nice," she said. "Now they're building up the houses, and I assume more is coming. "Gosh,just so people can have an ocean view? It's sad." FUTURE GROWTH, FUTURE LIMITS? Regardless of their views on previous development, when asked to consider the future most residents interviewed for the poll — 80 percent —were optimistic that growth can be balanced. They supported limits to achieve that balance — especially to preserve more open space. http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/1 1/0 I/community/po]100 lw.shtml 11/3/98 O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 7 of 8 Still, 55 percent said they preferred that new housing in the future be directed to areas that now are lower- density instead of existing cities. "People want their region to be growing and expanding, but they want their locality to stay the same — and, of course, that's an impossible dream," Baldassare said. Emster said as much in her chief complaint about growth—the traffic that makes her crazy is the fault of people who live in Riverside and San Bernardino counties who commute into Orange County for work. "Corona and Chino are all coming into our county because we pay better, and that's hurting us," she said. Create more jobs in those counties and growth in Orange County will be balanced, Emster said. Michael Sykes, 38, of Costa Mesa said he believes it is possible to balance growth, in principle —though in Orange County the time for that may have passed. "It's too late," he said. "The horses are out of the barn." The problem is the lack of an effective slow-growth movement here, Sykes said. "There doesn't seem to be a voice of reason talking about limiting growth," he said. "And people are feeling helpless." Others were more optimistic. "What I would do is stop tearing down the old buildings," said Galagar, whose favorite places include Old Towne Orange and downtown Fullerton. "Maybe make an area like the Third Street Promenade in Santa Monica, where you can walk at night." Logan said she believes growth can be balanced if it comes with adequate support services —new houses and shopping centers need new roads and sewers and the like. http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/11/01/community/po11001 w.shtml 11/3/98 O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 8 of 8 Ortiz offered a similar hope for the future. "Things will continue to grow," he said. "There just has to be some real good planning on where to build and grow." Hertz said the results of the poll suggest that residents —no matter their view on growth— have learned from past growth in the county. "Even those who are satisfied with what happened in the past may be educated by that experience," he said. "And they want future planning policies to be more conscious of the effects of growth." Next: What Orange County residents have to say about the future of the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station site. 81n ,oapr In Orange county.CalromW CapyrlgM tyre Orange GouMy flop)&er Plan.wM m mmonno nh I. 1pglsmr®I'nM hootl_�cym http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/I1/01/community/poll001w.shunt 11/3/98 COMMUNITY CHARACTER VS. IS BALANCE POSSIBLE? GROWING OUT OF THE GROWTH COUNTY i Overall,In Orange County,do you feel there has been a good Do you feel it is possible for an area to develop In a way Asked what might cause them to leave the county, balance between these competing interests,or do you feel that offers adequate economic growth,fobs and housing residents listed: there has been too much emphasis on one or the other? while maintaining the character of the community and Not certain: protecting open space and the environment? Reasons Countryside 6% Too much —� Not certain: Growth and overpopulation: 50% emphasis on. No 131/T. 7% Traffic and congestion: 45% openspace: Crime: 17% �414 Too much Cannot afford cost of living: 13% emphasis on I Cannot find affordable housin 9% growth k, yes'80%. 9: 41% . , Residents of north and south Orange County differed on ; Asked for examples of mistakes made In development residents in why they might consider a move:' all parts of the county listed several common themes: .North South Responses Percentage Reasons Count- County 'Residents of north Orange Countyy we re slightly more positive about Roads and traffic congestion: 27% Growth and overpopulation: 53% 43% growth than residents of south county: 9 Responses North County South County Developed too fast 25% Traffic and congestion: 50% 39% "Good balance 50% 44% Development poorly planned: 15% Crime: 24% 7% Too much growth 40% 47% Lack of open space: 15% Wrong element moving In: 12% 2% Stine:Orangebounty Register Pall LIMITS ON GROWTH? would you SupportsetOng The poll focused on growth aside certain areas as iA issues.Here aresome responses. Permanent open space if Others on page 18. this requires placing limits oneconomicand Do you feel there should be population growth in stronger limbs placed on growth Nose areas? In Orange County? Not certain: Depends on 4% j limits:]% No: No:20% 9% ?FBa HMXI51fhe Orange County Register Yes:]3% Yes t3% In Mission Viejo on Feather Ridge Trail near Oso Parkway '' 'S$; and Antonio Parkway,workers frame the roofs of new Depends. homes.O'Neill Regional Park and Trabuco Creek liejust Soma:Orange County Reyirter roll spedfics:4% below the development. The many.Ovary Register open Space in Project l-nucizeu Page 1 of i eWS GO le 0 eX .� GG - t ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP? /d/ FROM LAX TO SAN JOSE I J Monday, November , Open Space in Project Criticized . Land use: Regulators wonder if Saddleback Meadows"wildlife corridors'are big enough. By DEBORAHSCHOCH, Times Staff Writer �I I first glance, Saddleback Meadows looks like a cookie- cutter version of many other projects springing up in the RELATED Orange County foothills. It's to be a gated community of G.C.SECTIONS single-family homes grouped around cul-de-sacs in the MAIN PAGE Trabuco Canyon area,with price tags of$300,000 and up. But a unique and highly contentious feature can be found in NE WS BY one comer of the project map: a 500-foot gap between house COMMUNITY lots labeled a"wildlife corridor,' through which rare birds and SPORTS other wild creatures would travel. And on the eve of a vote Tuesday on the project by the PREP SPORTS Board of Supervisors,concerns have escalated as to whether that corridor is wide enough to serve as the crucial link for a BUSINESS much-hailed county network of wildlife preserves. LIFE&STYLE While county planners appear satisfied, state and federal regulators continue to raise concerns that the corridor is flawed. CALENDAR In fact,the state Department of Fish and Game plans to provide information to supervisors Tuesday,said department official CALENDAR Bill Tippets. WEEKEND "It's a big deal. It's a critical linkage area." added biologist HOME DESIGN John Bradley of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. In fact, Saddleback Meadows promises to be a litmus test of COMMENTARY a nationally touted program intended to help stave off T.V.TIMES extinction for Orange County's rare plants and animals. That program, launched by Gov. Pete Wilson with the support of U.S. Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt,has already produced a sprawling, 37,000-acre preserve in the county's central and coastal areas, and a second preserve in South County is ADVERTISEMENT planned' A key link between the two reserves: the picturesque wilds of Saddleback Meadows, flanked by two religious centers and hills rich with native plants and animals. And with supervisors N•w s poised to approve the housing project on 222 acres,some state http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000099468.htrnl 11/2/98 Open Space in Project Lritrcrzea rage Z ut J and federal regulators worry that it will block the Flow of y wildlife. J�C•:r Some regulators and environmentalists fear that if rare songbirds and other animals cannot travel between the two reserves,the costly and complex Natural Community Conservation Plan reserve program blessed by Babbitt and VISA Wilson could be derailed. Instead of a network of reserves,the county could have two reserve"islands,"with encroaching suburbanization threatening the future of rare wildlife. County planning administrator Tim Neely defends the proposed link. "Obviously a wider corridor would be preferable,but this project has a long and complicated history. And in light of that history,I'm not sure that this proposed corridor is unreasonable,"Neely said. "It's hard for me to imagine this is so terrible in light of all the work we've done," said Pike Oliver,a principal with Newport Beach-based TPG Management Inc.,which is managing the project for landowner California Quartet.As for the concerns of state and federal regulators,Oliver said, "Pve never seen an agency that hasn't asked for more." The debate over Saddleback Meadows stretches back two decades,with plans taking many forms,from a 318-home project to a cluster of 705 mobile homes. Opponents include environmental groups and the neighboring St. Michael's Abbey and the Ramakrishna monastery.The abbey is owned by the Norbertine Fathers of Orange,a Catholic religious order,while the Ramakrishnas are an independent faith tied to Hinduism. The two religious centers have retained attorney Edmond Connor,who heads the county Bar Assn.,and have spent months attempting to craft a compromise. One plan calls for a conservancy to buy 178 acres of the California Quartet property to preserve it for open space. The purchase would be financed with$1.5 million from the county and$3.7 million from the Saddleback Meadows Land Conservancy,formed by the Norbertine fathers and benefactor Kathryn Swiss,Connor said.The developer could then build homes on the remaining 44 acres. But the negotiations,assisted by Supervisor Todd Spitzer, apparently ran aground,although talks reportedly will continue today.The 299-home project,meanwhile, was approved 4-1 on Oct. 7 by the county Planning Commission. "The story here is that the cowry is processing this thing at breakneck speed," Connor said. A local review board,in fact,has asked the supervisors to postpone action because it lacked time to study it properly. Based on the information at hand,the Foothill Trabuco Specific Plan Review Board voted 4 to 0 with one abstention to oppose the project. But others say the county has had ample time for study. "It's time for the county to decide what it wants—to at least decide the outside of what's going to happen on this property," said Oliver with the fine managing the project. "I believe we've done what we can do within the limits of our discretion to advance an alternative that our biologist has advised us satisfies reserve design requirements," said Neely at http://www.latimes.com/HOMEINEWS/0RANGE/t000099468.html 11/2/98 Open Space in Project Criticized page 6 of S the county. Yet,state and federal officials have failed to reconcile their differences with the county over the projeefs effects on wildlife. In a joint Aug. 11 letter to county supervisors,the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the state Department of Fish and Game outline what they term "significant biological issues related to the project site." For instance,the federally endangered Riverside fairy shrimp can be found in at least seven wetlands on the property, the letter states. The rare cactus wren has been found on site, with the threatened California gnatcatcher found nearby. A 299-home project poses "a significant threat" to the existing habitat connection,the letter states. It asks the board to consider an alternative that would allow development"while maintaining an essential biological connection"between the two reserve areas. But in an Oct. 19 memorandum,Neely reported that a biologist with Dudek and Associates,which works for the county and South County landowners,had concluded that with proper replanting of vegetation,the proposed corridor would allow movement of birds and small mammals.Neely recommends the county conclude that the project"will not preclude or prevent the preparation" of a South County preserve. That conclusion is"premature," said Bradley at Fish and Wildlife. "We haven't gotten far enough along on the analysis of reserve designs." And environmentalist Pete DeSimone goes even further. "If the 299 homes go in,and the wildlife movement area is impacted to the extent we expect," DeSimone said, "then our ability to come up with a viable [South County preserve] is severely compromised,if not impossible." • as How Much Is Enough? The Saddleback Meadows community in the Trabuco Canyon area wuld include a 500-foot gap between homes to be set aside as a wildlife corridor. Convrieht 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved Seatch the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about ENVIRONMENT—ORANGE COUNTY WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT. OPEN SPACE,ORANGE COIJN7Y—DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT,TRABUCO CANYON(CAl.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. _aW5_ _._. GO __ GO http://www.latimes.con-dHOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000099468.html l irng ramt ar a ttas aouuu atwua pama uu muct.-nuctaug uccn CE t2tL�lL'nalogy sEo oxs�_E - M uMAa rn s m ocregister.com LLiWi� Farm area has doubts about plan for muck-sucking trees ,��, ENVIRONMENT: An experiment would use trees to rid the round of waste. T"arknof s°acifi: �° poplar 9 Edgeo Mature Edge°I Nature October 16, 1998 at°'t° tdba O:ean Page By HANS GREIMEL our unieeise The Associated Press Se vi. Thank DALLAS, Ore. — Some people living in and around 11 ^ -^ this fainting community are fighting a city plan to use a grove of poplar trees to suck sewage and industrial �� T' waste from the ground like 100-foot soda straws. Tr --_— The experimental new approach is generating interest globally as a green solution to a messy problem, and --- --_ Dallas is one of the fast places to try it. The city plans to spray the trees with waste water from a computer circuit-board factory. The waste contains salts, copper, heavy metals and possibly cyanide. Scientists say the poplars will rid the ground of ammonia and nitrogen by safely metabolizing the compounds in their wood, keeping the heavy metals and salts fixed in place in the soil. But some neighbors believe the grove taking root in their back yards will be another toxic waste dump that will poison their wells. "We're absolutely outraged about the whole process," said Penny Cox, who heads a dozen residents suing to block the plan. Dallas has planted almost 1,300 knee-high saplings on a 3-acre test plot and could begin dumping the water as early as next spring. If the three-year demonstration succeeds, a full-scale project could reach 175 acres. "It isn't a hazardous-waste site," said City Manager http://w -ocregister.com/science/I 6toxsuck.shtml 10/16/98 Roger Jordan. "The scale of it is small enough that there won't be any long-term or short-term environmental impacts." The city of 11,000 discharges nearly 2 million gallons of treated sewage water a day directly into Rickreall Creek. But in the summer, when the river runs low, the discharge exceeds legal concentration limits. The solution: a technology developed in the past three years that relies on fast-growing hybrid poplars to lap up nearly 3,000 gallons of waste per acre per day. However, scientists acknowledge that if the soil acidity isn't carefully maintained, some contaminants could leach into the groundwater. And that's what has residents worried. a1 newspaper In Orange County,Calfforni. U .. Copyright 1998 The Onrge County Register Please seM comments to o isterRIink treedom.w http://www.ocregister.com/science/i6toxsuckshtml 10/16/98 Sewage spill shuts portion of neat ream communitysErnoxs ixaaxtrru� ome age p;� m' u o ccess iF ME 0xAN6E COUNTY RWISTEF 'rl� ocregister.com iW�y Outside Ora rqe County Sewage spill shuts portion of Seal Fie`,tch Beach obituaries October 13, 1998 By HEATHER MacDONALD The Orange County Register An overflowing sewage pipe closed a small portion of �— Seal Beach Sunday morning, but officials said the whole beach should be open again Wednesday morning. "The crowds this time of year are minimal;" said lifeguard Jeff Aldinger. "You couldn't even tell the difference." About 10 am. Sunday, a surfer notified lifeguards that a pipe on the Seal Beach Municipal Pier was emptying into the ocean and onto the beach. The Orange County Enviromental Health Department determined that the liquid was wash water and sewage, said lifeguard Capt. Steve Cushman. "Now we're just waiting for the water samples, which shouldn't take more than another day or so," Cushman said. Roughly 100 yards of the beach was closed on both sides of the pier, from Eighth Street to IOth Street. Bathrooms on the pier were also closed. No swimmers, surfers or sunbathers were turned away because of the spill, nor was anyone sickened or injured, officials said. The pipe feeds into a holding tank in the Eighth Street parking lot, which in turn connects to the main sewer on Ocean Avenue. The contents of the pressurized holding tank empty into the main tank twice an hour, or when the holding tank is full. When the pipe overflowed, so did the holding tank, sending the http://www.ocregister.com/commurlity/beachOl3w.shtml 10/16/98 ......ug., ay... auuu pw...w... ................. . —_' — -- — sewage into the ocean. The city-owned pipe removes waste from nearby Ruby's Restaurant. Business at the restaurant was not affected by the spill. i1 newspaper in Orange coaft Celffoaaa 'l�egisfier' Copyright mmo9a Tha Orange County nalin Register Please send comments io odeaister®link.freetlom.com http://www.ocregister.com/cornmunity/beach013w.shtml 10/16/98 Carwashes Get Huge Bills for Superfund Site Cleanup Page 1 of 5 News !� co Site Index FRONT PAGE HELP Monday, October 19, 1998 Carwashes Get Huge Bills for Superfund Site Cleanup ■Pollution: Charges run into six figures although only dirt from cars went to Monterey Park toxic waste dump. ByANTONIO OLIVO, Times Staff Writer o much time had passed that Tim Wilson nearly forgot he once operated a carwash in Sherman Oaks near the Cadillac dealership he has owned on Ventura Boulevard for more than 30 years. ADVERTISEMENT But when he opened the mail recently, Wilson was painfully reminded of the Casa De Cascade Car Wash, closed in 1980 due to poor revenues. News Inside an envelope from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was a bill for$142,500, Wilson's share of the cost of Looking cleaning a Monterey Park toxic waste site that he had no idea for an existed. His contribution to that Superfund site?Dirt that had been apartment? washed from the cars, stored in a holding tank and later trucked there, the EPA said. "What the hell is this?" the 68-year-old car dealer recalled a..S saying that June morning. He said he had been careful over the years to comply with every environmental regulation on the books. The EPA acknowledges that Wilson and about 680 area businesses and public agencies that recently received bills did nothing wrong. Instead, EPA officials said the group acted responsibly over the years by sending their waste--soapy carwash mud, petroleum products, industrial cleaning solvents qr regular household garbage—to a licensed landfill built by Operating Industries Inc. in 1948. But because the Monterey Park landfill has since been turned into a Superfund site, those billed must, under federal law, help foot the$600-million cleanup cost, officials said. Their portion of the cost, officials said, is based on the volume of waste they sent to the site that was closed in 1984, and not its level of toxicity--something that has outraged carwash owners like Wilson. The group's predicament, common among thousands of businesses near closed-down landfills across the country, lies at the core of current efforts in Congress to reform the federal law framing the EPA's Superfund program, which has a budget of http://www.metahollywood.com/HOME/NEWS/FRONT/t000094967.htm] 10/19.198 t,wwasnes bet huge nws for aupermna bite ueanup rage c ui $1.39 billion this year. Critics say the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (known as CERCLA)unfairly punishes businesses--small and large—that are only remotely connected to Superfund toxic waste sites being cleaned by the EPA- Enacted in 1980 as a result of New York's Love Canal crisis, the law "is something that has not made sense for a long time," said Drew Page, a San Diego attorney who has pushed for Superfund reform on behalf of the Downey-based Western Car Wash Assn. "It's irrational and needs to be changed." 'This Bill Is Not a Penalty' EPA officials and environmentalists defend the law, saying it is the only fair way to recover money needed to clean up the 1,436 Superfund sites that are polluting soil, ground water and drinking water sources throughout the country. Of those sites, hundreds are closed-down landfills. "This bill is not a penalty," said Arthur Haubenstock, an EPA attorney in charge of recovering money needed to clean the Monterey Park landfill. "We're not saying [the 680 businesses] are immoral or illegal or wrong." Rather, "it's just a question of who should have to pay for cleaning up this mess," he said. The site is bordered by the Pomona and Long Beach freeways, Haubenstock noted. "There are a huge number of commuters who pass by it every day," he said. "You've got gases from there percolating into people's houses." The 680 businesses and municipalities are considered by the EPA to be minor polluters. Documented to have contributed between 2,100 and 110,000 gallons of waste to the landfill since 1948, their group includes carwashes, light manufacturers, auto repair shops, municipalities and a few high-profile corporations, including the Walt Disney Co. Other companies and municipalities that dumped more than 110,000 gallons of waste at the 190-acre site are considered major polluters by the EPA That group--responsible for more than half of the heavy industrial waste causing problems at the Monterey Park site—was billed by the EPA during the late 1980s. Of that group of major polluters, 133 have agreed to pay a combined S300 million. Though the 680 businesses and municipalities are not considered by the EPA as major sources of the toxic pollution in Monterey Park, under the liability law they can each be held liable for the entire $600-million cleanup cost of the Superfund site. Should they decide to ignore the EPA's recent notice, the minor polluters could also be sued by the group of major polluters for even more than what the federal agency is asking for. http://www.metahollywood.com/HONE/NEWS/FRONT/t000094967.html 10/19/98 Carwashes Get Huge Bills for Superfund Site Cleanup Page 3 of 5 Those companies—which, according to the EPA, include Arco, Chrysler Corp. and Times Muror Co., which owns The Times— seek to recoup from minor polluters like Wilson some of the $300 million they have contributed. Attorneys for the major polluters say they have already sued and recovered about $75 million from other polluters who refused to pay the govertunent. The EPA advised the minor polluters to settle their bills, promising them legal protection from the corporations as a result and offering a 5% cost reduction if they paid right away. Feeling trapped, carwash owners call their predicament unfair. Their waste—essentially soapy mud—is on the cleaner side of the spectrum of industrial solvents, oil and city trash legally sent to the Monterey Park landfill for decades, the carwash owners contend. Critics complain that the bills for carwash waste—ranging from $7,200 to $377,000 per business—are typical of how minor polluters are steamrollered by the federal law intended to clean up more toxic pollution. Several carwash owners in the Los Angeles area have hired lawyers to fight their bills. Because the state has assured industry groups that their waste is not considered hazardous--unless engine steam-cleaning is part of their services—the carwashes are disputing the bills. EPA attorneys said the businesses have until the end of October to pay. Attorneys for several carwashes said their clients have been refused help from their insurance companies because they were not covered for toxic pollution before 1980, when the law went into effect. Many, like Wilson—who did not steam-clean engines--said they didn't think they needed such coverage, given the state's view of their waste. State and federal officials, however, said what is considered nonhazardous by California is not necessarily viewed the same way by EPA officials. Carwash owners complain that is unfair. "We feel we have demonstrated for years that our[waste] is not hazardous," said Sam Olivito, executive director of the 600- member Western Car Wash Assn. "This law brings us into a group of polluters that we shouldn't be in," he said. "This could put a lot of our folks out of business." Mike Genewick, whose Carson carwash was billed for $103,000, said, "The law is ludicrous." Referring to an EPA estimate that does not foresee completely removing the toxic waste from the Monterey Park landfill for another 80 years, Genewick said: "The only people benefiting from this are the attorneys and the environmental consultants, because nothing is getting cleaned up." The provision that makes it possible for the EPA to hold a single party liable for the entire cleanup cost of a Superfund site is a tort law measure called "joint several and liability." Essentially, it means that an ounce of pollution at a Superfund site linked to your http://www.metahoflywood.com/HONMINEWS/FRONT/t000094967.htnil 10/19/98 Carwashes Get Huge Hills for Superfund Site Cleanup rage 4 or D business can make you legally responsible for the entire cleanup cost. That aspect of Superfund cleanup and the fact that businesses can be punished retroactively for actions that were legal before 1980 are the chief sources of complaints about the EPA's Superfund program. Consistently upheld by federal courts, "the retroactive nature of the law is perhaps one of the most litigated issues of all time," said Dallas attorney David Whitton,who has helped craft a number of Superfund reform bills that sit in congressional committees awaiting approval. "What you did that was legal in the 1950s suddenly becomes illegal today," he said. "That logic has affected a lot of small businesses and insurance companies." The rationale behind aggressively going after minor polluters is one of fairness, EPA officials said. Because toxic waste sites are so expensive to clean, it is necessary to spread the burden of cost evenly among those who have contributed, said Kathleen Johnson, who oversees the legalities of EPA cleanup efforts in the western United States. "It is not fair to the major contributors for us to just dismiss the fact that there were hundreds of other people who brought in smaller amounts" of hazardous waste to landfills like the one in Monterey Park, she said. The point of the "joint several and liability measure" is to scare polluters into paying what the EPA determines to be their fair share of the cost, Johnson said. Most businesses agree to pay the much smaller bill presented the EPA before the question of enforcing that provision arises, she said. Critics complain that in cases where the connection to toxic pollution is either hazy or insignificant, the measure puts unfair pressure on businesses to fork over cash for a problem they are only minutely responsible for. Many small businesses that pay the EPA do so because they are convinced the legal expense of fighting their bills would be even higher, critics say. "When you hold that kind of hammer over people, it is not a level playing field," said Kip Prahl, a Sacramento-based environmental consultant. "These are a lot of innocent people who have had their trash picked up like everybody else." But because they are businesses, he added, "the government takes a very heavy hand with them. Twenty years after the fact, all of a sudden the government comes back to them and says: 'You did a very terrible thing.'And they say: 'What did I do?"' Carwash Owner Says Business Has Fallen Off That's how Richard Duffy, owner of Burbank's Lakeside Car Wash, responded to his $58,000 bill. "I just don't understand it," he said. "I thought I did everything I http://www.metahollywood.conVHONM/NEWSIFRONT/t000094967.htn l 10/19/98 Carwashes Get Huge Bills for Superfund Site Cleanup Page of D was supposed to." With dirty cars not rolling in like they did shortly after he opened his shop in 1948, Duffy said he will be hard-pressed to come up with the money. His insurance company has also refused to help, he said. On the advice of the Western Car Wash Assn., Duffy said he will probably ignore the bill and hope it will go away. "I'm going to let nature take its course," he said. David Giannotti, a Los Angeles attorney who represents the group of large companies that have already settled with the EPA for$300 million, promised aggressive legal action in response to such an approach. Perhaps fearing reprisal from Giannotti s group, some on the list of 680 have already settled their bill, EPA officials said. Giannotti acknowledged that the position minor polluters are in is unfair, but "the law is what it is. They must pay their share as we move forward to what we hope is a final remedy" on the Monterey Park site. "There are a number of things about CERCLA that just cry out for change," said Giannotti, who represented one of the polluters involved in the Love Canal case during the late 1970s and has specialized in Superfund law ever since. As it stands, the nature of the law "is one that forces [major polluters] to be sure to pull in as many others as they can" into the process of cleaning a Superfund site, he said. "Whether it's the local mom-and-pop store or Exxon Oil." In the case of the landfill in Monterey Park, EPA officials have determined that about 1,500 additional Los Angeles-area companies—senders of even smaller amounts of waste than the 680 now targeted—can be tapped next to help pay for the cleanup. Because they sent less than 2,100 gallons of waste to the landfill, their bills probably will be no greater than$7,200, EPA officials said. But those businesses will still be liable for the entire $600- million cleanup cost and run the risk of lawsuits from other companies if they refuse to pay. Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: CARWASHES—FINANCES POLLUTION.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS— DISPOSAL LIABB.II'Y, SUPERFUND BUSINESS.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve otre. News Go ite Index , Go http://www.metahollywood.com/HONE/NEWS/FRONT/t000094967.htn 1 10/19/98 Health officials say public wins with closure of plant Page I of 2 community Home Page mWAR AutoAETcP m o m9 stet amps, Ouhld•Ony Gm,lr Ma,hc lch Health officials say public wins with oh wda closure of plant REACTION: The Capistrano water district didn't have the infrastructure to handle some waste, so it was dumped in a field. October 22, 1998 By MAYRAV SAAR The Related story: The Orange County Register DANA POINT—Both sides • Capistrano water district cleared in in asewage-drooping case dumping case asserted victory Wednesday, but county health officials said the public is the real winner. Orange County Superior Court Judge Michael Brenner ordered the Capistrano Beach Water District to shut down the Victoria Sewage Treatment Plant by June 30, 1999, as part of a settlement of the dumping case. "I think that the main thing we were concerned with was that untreated human sewage was being dumped near a creek that goes to Doherty Beach," said Larry Honeyboutme, program chief of the Orange County Health Care Agency's water quality division. He added that there was no evidence that any sewage flowed into the creek. Honeybourne played a crucial part in the district attorney's investigation that led to the order to close the plant: After water district employees blew the whistle on their agency's repeated sewage dumping, http://www.ocregister.com/community/capos22w.shtrnl 10/22/98 Health officials say public wins with closure of plant Page 2 of 2 Honeyboume secretly watched district vactor rocks in May 1996 spew sludge in a field south of the Victoria plant, and reported his findings to prosecutors. Sanitation districts rely on gravity to push sewage from pipelines to treatment plants. When things like hills get in the way, a vactor truck is used like a vacuum to suck pooled sewage out of the lines, Honeybotune said. Normally, the trucks' contents are treated at a proper facility, but the Capistrano district did not have the infrastructure to handle that waste, so the district dumped the untreated sludge, prosecutors said. "The employees were offended by what they were being ordered to do," Deputy District Attorney Michelle Lyman said. "I felt (the ordered closure) was pretty elegant. It should have been out of business years ago." Paul S. Meyer, attorney for the water district, said the agency was not negligent. "This settlement permits us to go back to the work of continuing to provide clean, safe and reasonably priced service to our ratepayers." Actually, the Capistrano district planned to close the Victoria plant as part of a mandated merger of that district, South Coast Water District and Dana Point Sanitary District. The county Board of Supervisors is expected to approve the merger Nov. 10. Staff writer Pat Brennan contributed to this report. 81 Mwepper m onnP Celnb.Ce L Rupw CWjAgM 1998 The OmWe County Reg er Pbase emM eenments to oaanuterQlink heetlommm http://www.ocregister.com/community/capos22w.shtn l 10/22/98 Capistrano water district cleared in dumping case Page 1 of 2 sftCCi1t111tIJiltlty/ icenous _ Baas errtra Home Page p m AUI—.A ese txroc.xer couxn eeemen ocregisterxom O.hida Bnrye CDVptr B ,h. Capistrano water district cleared in o "�;' ;, dumping case SETTLEMENT: But as part of an agreement with the District Attorney's Office, its treatment plant must close. October22, 1999 By MAYRAV SAAR Related story: The Orange County Register *+ . Health of olals say DANA POINT—The public wins with Capistrano Beach Water closure of plant District was cleared Wednesday of all criminal charges in a 1996 sewage dumping case, but was ordered to shut down its treatment plant. In a settlement with the District Attorney's Office, water district officials agreed to close the Victoria Sewage Treatment Plant by June 30, 1999, and pay a $75,000 fine for dumping untreated sewage in a field near San Juan Creek in May 1996. The district's liquid wastes will now be handled across the creek at the South East Regional Reclamation Authority plant, which already handles Capistrano's solid wastes. As part of the settlement, misdemeanor charges were dropped against district General Manager Dennis Emerson Mac- Lain. The district's chief plant operator, Steven Corey http://www.ocregister.com/community/capo022w.shtml 10/22/98 Capistrano water district cleared in dumping case Page 2 of 2 Sanchez, pleaded guilty Oct. 13 to discharging sewage, a misdemeanor. Wednesday, he was sentenced to three years' probation and 200 hours of physical community service. The settlement comes one year after county prosecuters filed 26 criminal charges, including 12 felony counts, against the district and Sanchez for discharging liquid sludge from vactor trucks —used to vacuum sewer lines — into the field. "A thorough investigation by the district attorney did not reveal any pollution of water," Paul Meyer, attorney for the district, said Wednesday. "The district did not admit liability or negligence by the settlement." -- - _ H rwspeper In a.npe ew^tY Cemems -- �nmam rase rn.aanpe coumy a�smar Plano wrM wmmen4 to wiwibter(AI nk hootlom wm http://www.ocregister.com/community/capo022w.shtn l 10/22/98 Boise Chica fight comes down to one last stand Page tot 4 ome age � m, F7317ccess c m' fL THE OMNGE LOHNtt REGIAr0. t ocregister.com - --- - - Bolsa Chica fight comes down to rvy one last stand LAND USE: An environmental group's battle with developers over a eucalyptus rove Technologydthrep"ift np P YP 9 b�d�nd,ie rant may be the final round in the dispute. Edge or Nature El N& Uk H October 24, 1998 Oc.n N, Our Universe Savew By OLIVIA HAWKINSON 11t=nk The Orange County Register ------ •^ r=„s From Huntington Beach n'-•----fig s— The leaves of the towering eucalyptus trees rustle in T7 the breeze. A red-tailed hawk peers down from its perch atop a dead branch, and the whoops and whistles of songbirds pierce the air. The only signs of civilization are the sounds of distant bulldozers and an occasional airplane. The grove overlooks the Bolsa Chica wetlands from an area known as the mesa, or upper grassland. It shades a dusty trail popular with joggers, bicyclists and dog walkers. The trees offer a rare roosting place for raptors, or buds of prey, and a laundry list of other birds. This 6.5-acre string of trees may be the last stand in the decades-long battle over development at Bolsa Chica. An environmental group's appeal of two court rulings supporting a 1,235-home development rests on the trees, which are to be cut down. The Bolsa Chica Land Trust argues that the grove's environmental value was not adequately addressed when Orange County approved the plan by California Coastal Communities, formerly Koll Real Estate Group, for the development called Warner Mesa— the homes, a regional park and open space on 200 acres of the mesa. The 4th District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana last http://www.ocregister.com/archives/I 998/10/24/science/tree024w.shtml 10/28/98 Bolsa Chica fight comes down to one last stand Page t oI 4 week completed its hearing on the appeal and has until Jan. 14 to decide. If the court denies the appeal, development would probably start next year. If the court rules in favor of the Land Trust, the developer would have to come up with a new plan and return to the Coastal Commission for a fourth time. The commission first approved a plan for 5,700 homes and a marina in 1986. The company plans to chop down the 90-year-old Australian trees and replace them with new trees on the Huntington mesa, a narrow strip of grassland at the other end of Bolsa Chica, according to spokeswoman Lucy Dunn. Trees that were once native to the area, such as sycamores and oaks, would be planted there, and "roosting poles"would provide birds with temporary perches until the saplings reached maturity, Dunn said. "The (eucalyptus) trees are dying," said Dunn, executive vice president of Hearthside Homes, a subsidiary of the real estate company. "Under our plan, we were going to (plant) native trees that will survive and grow tall and allow for the trees to become a good place to nest. Does it make sense to ... keep a dying habitat?" Those who stroll beneath the trees love the sanctuary and the birds. Even the groups that fight over this land speak with a shared reverence for the habitat. Land Trust members have argued that not all the trees are dying and say even the dead wood remains a valuable perch for hawks, falcons, owls and other birds. In 1982, the grove and the grassland and scrub beneath were identified as a 20-acre environmentally sensitive habitat area, or ESHA, by the state Department of Fish and Game. The birds roosting in the eucalyptus groves differ from those in the wetlands nearby, said Connie Boardman, a biology professor at Cerritos College and a Land Trust member. Approximately 20 species of raptors perch on the tall trees to view their prey in extensive wetlands to the south and in the mesa grassland to the north, according to Tustin biologist Pete Bloom. http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/10/24/science/treeO24w.shtmi 10/28/98 Bolsa Chica fight comes down to one last stand rage i of 4 The raptors swoop down from the trees to hunt gophers, mice and small birds in the wetland areas, which are occupied by other buds, such as snowy egrets and pelicans, Boardman said. "It's wonderful to be able to walk 50 feet away from the wetlands and see a completely different variety of birds," she said of the eucalyptus grove. One year ago, the Coastal Commission approved the real estate company's plan to destroy and replace the ESHA, and the San Diego County Superior Court upheld that decision in December. The grove is the only roosting spot for raptors in northern Orange County, Bloom said. The county environmental-impact report on the project said the loss of the habitat was "not considered significant" because the bird species that use it are common, or at least not endangered. Boardman said she counts all the dead wood as part of the grove and the habitat should remain untouched, even when trees die or fall. "Even dead trees have use—buds of prey make use of dead wood as hunting sites," Boardman said. "Even if(the trees) don't look pretty to us,they're still used and still important. "The (replacement grove)that's planned up on the Huntington mesa is pitiful," she said. "They're planning to plant saplings, and it will take 20 or 30 years for those to grow. By then the birds will he gone." The grove would be replaced by a 5-mile nature trail connecting with trails in Bolsa Chica State Ecological Preserve, Dunn said. The trees were planted as agricultural windbreaks by employees of the Bolsa Chica Gun Club around the turn of the century. Eucalyptus is native to Australia and was brought to this country about 200 years ago, said Bloom, an independent biologist and consultant who focuses on raptors. Eucalyptus trees in Irvine have reached 180 feet with http://www.ocregister.com/archives/I998/10/24/science/tree024wshtml 10/28/98 Bolsa Chica tight comes down to one last stand Page 4 or 4 no help from arborists, he said. The younger Bolsa Chica eucalyptus trees are 50 feet tall and offer the tallest perches in the area, Bloom said. "I certainly wouldn't describe them as healthy trees, but they're perfect trees for raptors," he said. The idea of replacement trees on the Huntington mesa has some value, Bloom said, but there's nothing like a mature grove of trees for birds to use for roosting, nesting and hunting. The ultimate way to preserve the local raptor population would be no mesa development, period, he said. 'Us fair to say (cutting down the trees) is a disaster to the local bird of prey population," he said. Resident Danny Cullinana, who visits the grove four or five days a week, said he loves the trees because they give him the feeling of being out in the country. Still, he understands the proposal to destroy them, he said. "I've seen one of those trees fall. The dead ones would probably have to be cut down," said Cullinana, a city resident for 37 years, who was walking his dog on the path Thursday. Rossmoor resident Diane Legros, who was taking pictures of the raptors Thursday, said she'd rather see the grove left wild than replaced by a walking trail with a higher concentration of people. "It's going to be really sad if they cut down the trees, especially for the hawks," said Legos, who said she has been coming to the grove daily since she stumbled upon it a year and half ago. "The birds are very shy. If the trees go down, the birds are going to go " 1 newspaper n nge County, om, a . ,1ftCytSf�t' . CopYtl9h1 lla rlia Orange County Reglaler Please sentl commends to oueaislen5llilu.lMEom.mm http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/10/24/science/treeO24w.shtml 10/28/98 Les taps for historic water area Page l of NUUUMTPLA ovEE"CalSLfl ;.s soeruage ® users —iG (� ter oematourrr ereisru k{3R .lr OcretJil9ter.co 1 -- It's taps for historic water area GOVERNMENT: Carpenter, O.C.'s last irrigation district, will hand over operations to IRWD. October 29, 1998 etb� By TERI SFORZA The Orange County Register Orange County's last irrigation district—which long refused to dissolve even though its customers nearly disappeared—will soon cease to exist. The Civil War was a fresh wound and Ulysses S. Grant was president when John and Alexander Carpenter bought a swath of land south of Santiago Creek in the 1870s. Precious water rights—to half the creek's flow—came with it, and soon the Carpenter Water Co. was bom. It went public as the Carpenter Irrigation District in 1927, serviced 1,500 acres of lush farmland north of Orange during World War II, then saw the county turn largely concrete and its customer base dwindle to a dozen. Grand juries repeatedly called on Carpenter to dissolve, but its directors refused. "There is history around what goes on here," board member Amos R.L. Deacon insisted in 1995. "We make a contribution." But under an agreement approved last week, Carpenter will cease to exist and the Irvine Ranch Water District will take over its operations as of Dec. 31. A "hostile takeover" attempt from neighboring Serrano Water District prompted the board to start talks with IRWD. http://www.ocregister.com/politics/carp029w.shtml 10/30/98 It's taps for tustonc water area Page t 01 t "They were going to take us over and basically take our money," said board member Leif Brudevold. IRWD gets Carpenter's 70 acres and $1 million in reserves. It promises to employ Carpenter's manager for two years; pay medical and other insurance for Carpenter's 14 directors, retired directors and spouses; and continue to provide cheap water to Carpenter's 12 customers until they die, or for 30 years, whichever comes first. The reorganization saves about $83,000 a year. "And then," Brudevold said, "we just drift off into the sunset." 1 newspaper in Me unty, r omu Regtsf et' . . Cspyripin 199a Toe Orar p County Register Please aeno comments to aaea4ler®Onk.heetlom.mm http://www.ocregister.com/politicstcarp029w.shtml 10/30/98 Water District I•med for Discharge to t-reeK ' ' ' tl " w- METRO HELP nn AS A MATTER OF FACT, WE DO LKNOW THE WAY TO SAN JOSE. sr tIMITE� Wednesday, cto r 28, 1 Official Business/Courts and Governments Water District Fined for Discharge to Creek �J n an ongoing dispute that may lead to Ned m PA I ar penalties of hundreds of thousands of >.. me genre dollars,the Las Virgenes Municipal �,o;,`;I� Water District has been fined for illegally ADVERTISEMENT discharging treated water into Malibu Creek,state officials ® said. Already facing a bill of more than$70,000 for releasing into the creek 19.2 million gallons of treated water from its Tapia Plant during September, district officials said this week they would unavoidably commit even greater violations, because of YElStI IOUS what they call unfair state restrictions. g Expecting more fines,district officials said they will appeal the penalties and argue for looser restrictions at a California Regional Water Quality Control Board meeting scheduled for Dec. 14. y� The plant's permit, approved by the state board in April, prohibits treated water from entering the creek from May to November of every year to protect endangered species in the Malibu Lagoon and limit the levels of human waste entering the ocean, state officials said. It requires the Las Virgenes district—which processes sewage from residents of the San Fernando Valley's western edge--to offer its highly treated water during that period to government and private agencies for use in irrigating parks, schools, golf courses and landfills. District officials complain that complying with the new restrictions is sometimes impossible--particularly in cool fall weather,when there is little demand for irrigation water. "We're trying,we're really trying," said Norm Buehring, director of resource conservation for the Las Virgenes district. Continued Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: LAS VIRGINES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FINES WATER POLLUTION—LOS ANGELES COUNTY,MALIBU CREEK.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. ew'F s — Tt e n ex — http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWSIMETRO/t000097861.1.html 10/29/99 Water UISUICL rmCU lot UtSCaargC 10 LrCCK rFTFwS­-----_jGO n GO METRO HELP=') Get the latest browser and email package. Free. rs Wednesday, cto er 28, 1999 Water District Fined for Discharge to Creek(cont'd) Previous Paee -Need.Vdo,or wve 1peenerc Handlingroughly 10 million gallons r •,"ry?SeIocl Ne 8 Y it per tonLf u. day with limited reservoir capacity,the ADVERTISEMENT district's storage capacity can be overwhelmed by the volume of water it treats when its customers don'twant it, Buehring said. The number of residents whose sewage the district treats has grown since 1988 by 10,000 to roughly 64,000, district Savings officials said. "We're trying to use what storage we have and have even tried to offer no-cost water to public agencies to limit the NextCard 77 number of days it would have to go into the creek," Buehring Online Balance said. Transfers. But,when the weather gets cold, "nobody is interested," Buehring said. 2.9% intro APR. Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: LAS VIRGINES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FrNES WATER POLLUTION—LOS ANGELES COUNTY,MALIBU CREEK. You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. n eX _. _... GO http://www.latimes.com/HOMEfNEWS/METR0/t000097861.2.html 10/28/98 News _.... C+" c;o Site.Index ? Go r ORANGE COU NTY NENES HELPy.` F?" �ii sew ii q J',tZtxw Wednesday, October 28, 1998 DANA PARSONS Water District Gets the Drop on Killer Parasite By DANA PARSONS id you catch the NBC movie Sunday night about the RELATED Ell potentially lethal parasite that tainted a town's water supply? Me neither. O.C.SECTIONS I probably should have, though, because rm leery of my tap MAIN PAGE water. Some would say mine is an abnormal fear, but all I can say is that when the faucet drips onto a dishrag, the rag turns brown. I NEWS BY was no them whiz, but I don't recall that being one of water's CONRAUN]TY qualities. NBC touted the story line in "Thirst" as depicting a "public SPORTS health hazard that leaves citizens a drop away from total PREP SPORTS destruction." That's exactly the kind of talk that Ron Wildennuth can't stand. BUSINESS As a spokesman for the Orange County Water District, Wildermuth's job is to assure customers that, when they take a LIFE A STYLB drink of water, they will five to tell about it. CALENDAR So, Wildermuth launched a preemptive strike the day before "Thirst" aired. The release said Orange County's water does not— CALENDAR repeat not—contain deadly parasites. "Current filtering processes WEEKEND prevent any parasitic life forms from entering Orange County's HOME DESIGN drinking water," he wrote. My initial thought was that Wildermuth has too much time on COMMENTARY his hands. Later, it dawned on me we're nearing the 60th anniversary of T.V.TIMES Orson Welles'Halloween radio broadcast of"The War of the Worlds," in which he told listeners that Martians had invaded New Jersey. People panicked, especially in New Jersey. Clearly, we could have used someone like Wfidennuth in 1938: "Martians Are Not ADVERTISEMENT Attacking New Jersey, and If They Do They'll Be Sorry," his press release might have said. NBC spokeswoman Rebecca Marks said she wasn't aware of I , any other water district in the country reacting as Orange County http://www.latimes.convHOME/NEWS/0RANGFJt000097726.htm1 10/28/98 did. r "It was a fictional account, it was entertainment," she said of the movie. "It was rooted in some fact, and I think it probably played into some people's fear about their drinking water. I have them, and t • I I t t Pm a logical, intelligent human being, but because we don't know about the filtering process, we all kind of get the heebie-jeebies INTO111 over where our water is coming from and whether it's clean and safe." Not to worry, Wildermuth said. "It was a pretty preposterous scenario in the movie," he said. "I saw it. We were just cutting it off at the pass [with the release], in case there was some kind of TV piece afterward, which I've seen so many times, like, 7s Orange County's water safe?' " The county gets its water from ground water sources and imports from the Metropolitan Water District. When I asked if the movie had any plausibility, Wildermuth said, "I don'tthink so. With the system we have in Orange County, its just not going to happen." Confident his release did the trick, Wildermuth noted, "We did not get any calls, by the way." Ifis review of the movie: "It would be kind of neat if you didn't know anything about water, but when you know something about water, you start picking it apart." The movie scored in one regard, he said: "All our water engineers were ecstatic that the movie actually highlighted them, for a change." It turns out, however, the plot wasn't as far-fetched as Wddermuth suggests. A parasite got into the Milwaukee water system in 1993 and made more than 400,000 people sick, according to newspaper accounts. A Milwaukee city health official said as many as 100 deaths might have been attributable to the contamination. Just last summer in Sydney, Australia, residents emptied store shelves of bottled water because of a reported contamination. Closer to home, the Metropolitan Water District received a patent this year to test for the contaminant mentioned in "Thirst." In general, however,Marks concurred with Wildermuth's reassuring tone. The tone of"Thirst," she said, was reminiscent of"Asteroid," the two-part drama NBC aired in February 1997. That movie was a "fun thriller with a tinge of reality" that was just real enough to worry people,Marks said. Apparently,NBC doesn't care if we're all paranoid. I asked Marks if the network is through scaring us. No, she said, there's a miniseries in production called "Atomic Train." Look for it next spring. That one, Marks said, "is in the vein of a runaway train, it's carrying nuclear weapons, and it's coming our way." Mr. Wildermuth and the citizens of Orange County, do not panic. http://www.latimes.com/HONM/NEWS/ORANGE/t000097726.html 10/28/98 water tstnct Vels the Ll UP Wl W1101 rarasae ...b.. .. e. .. Let me say to you as calmly as possible: Run for your lives. Dana Parsons'column appears Wednesday, Friday and Sunday. Readers may reach Parsons by calling(714)966-7821 or by writing to him at the Times Orange County Edition, 1375 Sunflower Ave., Costa Mesa, CA 92626, or by e-mail to dana.parsons(alatimes.com C YHzb[1998149 Angeles Taaea AR Rights Reserved I Search the archives ofthe L,os Angeles antes for similar stories.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. http://www.latimes.com/HOMFJNEWS/ORANGEtt000097726.html 10/28/98 _...__ columnists Gmesaye m NxuuclrEne� m ME GRANGE MUNIT REGISUR Irinlfr� ocregister.com i1liirrWW.�1H� oRtrwe Orange rORRty Be,ahes n Bllewatah gordon dillow ohitW Ei Low flush toilet doesn't sit well with plumber October 29, 7998 When she saw the offer in her water bill, Bridget Riley figured it was a pretty good deal. Her water company said it would give her a brand-new "ultra low flush" toilet. Absolutely free. All she had to do was come down and pick it up. Not that there was anything wrong with her old porcelain facility. It was still providing the stout yeoman service it always had. Still, it was more than 30 years old, and Bridget figured that maybe it was time for a change. So a couple of weeks ago, Bridget, 70, of Costa Mesa, sent her son to the offices of the Mesa Consolidated Water District to pick up her free toilet. And then she asked a plumber she knows to install it. But the plumber shook his head. You don't want that ultra low flush toilet, he told her. Not enough flushing power. You'll have to flush it two, three times to get the job done. If you don't, it'll clog your pipes. Based on that advice, Bridget decided to send the new toilet back. But it left her wondering. "It just doesn't make any sense," Bridget says. "If these new toilets cause all these problems, why are they giving them to people?" http://www.ocregister.com/community/dillow.shtml 10/30/98 Well, the simple answer is that it's the law. See, in 1992 Congress passed a law requiring every new residential toilet sold or installed in the U.S. to use no more than 1.6 gallons of water per flush. Until then, 3.5 gallons per flush was the usual standard. The idea, of course, was to save water. Unfortunately, there were a lot of complaints about the new toilets not having enough 000mph to propel their unmentionable cargos out of the house and on their way to the treatment plant. In fact, there've been reports of a black market springing up for old-style, 3.5-gallon-per-flush toilets that are smuggled in from Canada. And last year there was an unsuccessful move in Congress to repeal the 1.6 gallon standard. Nevertheless, about 25 million of the ultra low flush toilets have been installed in American homes— including virtually all homes in Orange County built since 1992. But according to the Municipal Water District of Orange County, there are still an estimated 1.2 million old-style toilets in the county. And the water district wants people to voluntarily trade in those old toilets for new low flush ones. So they've been offering discounts on the new toilets and in some cases even giving them away. So far, about 110,000 of the new toilets have been distributed. And Joe Berg, water use efficiency program manager for the water district, says the new toilets work just fine. "A lot of the negativity(about the new toilets) comes from the late-1980s, when they were being developed," he says. "But the flush effect has been greatly improved since then. Less than one-tenth of one percent of our customers ever have a problem— and if they do, we help them fix it." Meanwhile, Berg says, the new toilets offer tremendous water savings—about 10,500 gallons http://www.ocregister.com/conimunity/dillow.shtml 10/30/98 per toilet per year. I'm torn on this one. Yes, saving water is important. But so is having confidence in your bathroom fixtures. Of course, maybe its a moot point. Because 1.6 gallons per flush is the law. But if enough people decide that just isn't enough to do the job, the law could be changed. All we'd have to do is flush a few congressmen. Gordon Dillow may be reached at(714)953-7953. Si ners�in Umpe Courty.Cauomia conyavm teas me on�ga cemnr Re9alar Please ae�M cmnments to aaeaisle��ymk.freatlom.mm http-.//www.ocregister.com/community/dillow.shtml 10/30/98 _0 2 Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING October 28, 1998 �JN A ITgr� � � O � 9 o .a ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 OC9D.P.O.Box 9127•Fountain Valley,CA 927284127•(714(962-2411 v Minutes for Board Meeting p 10/28/98 Page 2 of 7 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on October 28, 1998, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Bumie Dunlap, Chair Glenn Parker X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson John Holmberg X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X George Brown Shawn Boyd X John Collins Laurann Cook X Jan Debay John E. Noyes X Barry Denes Richard A. Freschi A Brian Donahue Harty Dotson A Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry A John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater A Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Eva Miner-Bradford Paul F. Walker A Mark A. Murphy Joanne CAontz X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Margie Rice James V. Evans A Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts A Christina Shea Barry Hammond A William G. Steiner Todd Spitzer ave Sullivan X Tom Hannan D X Chedes E. Sylvia Ron Bates A Bob Zemel I Tom Daly STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Peterman; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Chuck Winsor; Mike Moore; Ryal Wheeler OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas Woodruff; Alternate Director Shawn Boyd; Adana Schafer Minutes for Board Meeting v 10/28/98 a Page 3 of 7 REPORT OF THE CHAIR The Chair reminded the Directors that the Board of Directors' meetings would be held on November le and December 160 due to the holidays, which is one week earlier than usual. It was also noted that the FAHR Committee was not scheduled to meet in November and January. Chair Dunlap reported that the inauguration of the compressed natural gas station would be held on October 30'". This project, which is a public1private partnership between the District, Southern California Gas Company, South Coast Air quality Management District, Power Systems Associates, Battelle and Pima Gro, is an excellent example of cooperation for the good of all. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 23, 1998, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A", "B", and "C', attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: 08/31/98 1 09/16/98 1 09/30/98 Totals $3,013,736.27 1 $3,200,070.37 1 $2,074,950.67 CONSENT CALENDAR 9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to execute a Quitclaim Deed for a 205 square foot parcel in Banning Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach to Gary Gumbert, in a forth acceptable to General Counsel. 10. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from David and Carol Day to annex 0.751 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Highcliff Drive and Brier Lane in the unincorporated area of Cowan Heights (Annexation No. OCSD-1 —Day Annexation); and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-47, authorizing initiation of annexation of said territory to the District. 11. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-48, ordering Annexation No. OCSD-2 - Portion of Tract No. 14185, in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Country Hills Road in the City of Anaheim, to the District. 12. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-49, ordering Annexation No. OCSD-3 - Deutsch Annexation, in the vicinity of Foothill Boulevard and East Lemon Heights Drive in the unincorporated area of Orange County, to the District. Minutes for Board Meeting y' 10/28/98 Page 4 of 7 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 14. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Peer Swan, Vice Chair of the Steering Committee, re the October 28, 1998 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 23, 1998 to be filed. C. Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, gave a brief update regarding the biosolids issue in Kern County. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Motion was amended authorizing staff to continue negotiations for a Memorandum of Understanding between Kern County and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) supporting: (1) $2.12 per ton fee paid by OCSD for transported biosolids on impacted roads; and, (2) Prepayment of$750,000 to Kem County to be refunded via tonnage credits over an approximate 5-10 year period. 15. DRAFr OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the October 14, 1998 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 14, 1998 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Increase the Year 2000 Date Change Budget Authorization from $500,000 to$2,141,500 for staff labor, material, and outside service costs through June 30, 1999; and (2)Approve Phase 2 of the Professional Services Agreement for Year 2000 Compliance project management and documentation services with Bristol Systems, Inc. for $160,000 for the period November 1998 to June 1999. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve an agreement with Municipal Water District of Orange County(MWDOC) for a multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program and direct staff to participate in Programs 1 and 2 for an amount not to exceed$150,000; and (2)Authorize staff to enter into a pilot project with MWDOC for Program 3 in an amount not to exceed $33,000. Minutes for Board Meeting 10/28/98 , Page 5 of 7 16. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re the meeting held on October 8, 1998 summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered thje draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 8, 1998 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 6 to Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage &Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage&Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55 with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of$101,202 and 59 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to 13,701,058. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 15 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1,Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction authorizing a net addition amount of$122,912 and 38 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$35,499,357. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. for Improvements to Existing Mechanical Systems, Job No. J-62,for an amount not to exceed $154,760, 17. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the meeting held on October 21, 1998 summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 21, 1998 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 1998. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the base salaries for the positions of Assistant General Manager, Director of Communications, Director of Information Technology and Controller to be above the maximum of the pay ranges. Directors Tom Hannan and Margie Rice opposed. Minutes for Board Meeting j 10/28/98 Page 6 of 7 18. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve the plans and specifications for Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-1, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to Southern Contracting Company for Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-1, for an amount not to exceed $1,271,000. 19. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file letter dated October 5, 1998, from Valley Waterproofing, Inc., protesting the waterproofing applicator qualifications for all bids; (3) Receive and file memorandum dated October 13, 1998, from General Counsel; (4) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation rejecting all bids; and (5) Authorize the General Manager to set the date for receipt of bids for Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid). 20. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Robert Burge, at al. v. Sanitation District of Orange County, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 800278, and authorize District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. 21. General Counsel reported a need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957, to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item Nos. 21(a)(1), (2), and (3). General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), upon a two-thirds'vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE: That the pending matter of litigation entitled Wal-Con Construction Co. v. County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 782457 be added to the agenda as Item No.21(a)(4), for discussion. CONVENE INCLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54956.9 AND 54957: The Board convened in dosed session at 7:18 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 21(a)(1), (2)and (4). Minutes for Board Meeting 10/28/98 y Page 7 of 7 RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:10 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. The General Counsel reported that the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. OCSD 98-50, approving Amendment No. 2 to the General Manager's contract. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m. Secretary of th oard of Dirg y rs of Orange County Sanitation Di ict H:\wp.dla%agendaX1998 Joint Board Minutes\702898.doo Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8131/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13650 The Vantage Group,Inc. $25,785.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 13651 Advance Constructors Inc. $107,897.00 Construction J-34-1,P2-35-5 13652 Blo Gro Division $25,735.28 Residuals Removal MO 4-2&95 13653 Boyle Engineering Corporation $25,557.10 Engineering Services 7-23 13554 Burch Ford $73,630.52 Vehicles Purchased-4-1998 Ford Taurus Sedans 13855 Carlyle Engineers $160,207.86 Engineering Services 136M Dell Marketing L.P. $33,333.01 9-Micro-computers&2 Printers for Divisions 510,520,490 13657 Glodich-Mitchell,Inc. $31,097.52 Pump Supplies 13658 James Martin&Co. $91,015.00 Data Integration Project 13659 Kemkon Pacific,Inc. $83.772.59 Fordo Chloride MO 9.27-95 13660 Margate Construction Inc. $168,851.96 Construction Pl-36-2 13661 Pima Go Systems Inc $154,592.05 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 13662 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. $61,488.16 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 13663 Southern California Edison $71.882.12 Power 13664 Tule RanchlMagan Farms $48.912.98 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 13655 Western Slates Chemical Inc. $36,720.90 Caustic Sods Solution MID&23-95 13666 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart $72,659.71 Legal Services MO 7.26-95 13657 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $1.164.804.43 Construction 7-7-1 13668 Systems Integrated $31,500.00 Professional Services-J-31-3 13669 Advanced Cooling Technologies $196.54 Electric Pads 13670 Air Products and Chemicals $23.289.96 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen System MO 8-8-89 13671 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. $3,254.05 Manhole Frames&Covers 13672 Allied Supply $4,786.37 Plumbing Supplies 13673 Almega Environmental&Technical $320.00 Emissions Source Testing of Combustion&Portable Engines r13674 American Sigma,Inc. $4.006.87 Instrumentation Pads&Supplies 13675 American Training Resources,Inc. $1,074.81 Training Materials 13676 Blake Anderson $168.97 Meeting Expense Reimb 13677 Anicom,Inc. $684.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies 13678 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $930.00 Service Agreement 13679 Appleone Employment Service $9.253.60 Temporary Employment Services 13680 Applied Industrial Technology $2,643.95 Pump Supplies 13681 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $8.800.00 Lab Supplies 13682 Atlantic Pool Care $401.79 Service Agreement 13683 Audio Video Reporting Services $37.33 Audiot ipe from Radio Show re:New Sewer Rates 13684 ACWA $90.00 1999 Salary Survey 13685 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. $10,500.00 Professional Services- Flaw Monitoring Project 13686 AKM Consulting Engineers $6.296.58 Professional Services-Contracts 11-17-3 13687 AM Best Co. $86.95 Subscription 13685 American Seals West $16.17 Gaskets 13689 ARMA international $100.00 Membership 13690 AWSI $96.98 D.O.T.Training Program 13691 Banana Blueprint,Inc. 54,491.25 Printing MO 11-7-94 13692 Battery Specialties $960.51 Batteries 13693 BloMedeux Vitek,Inc. $1.832.51 Lab Supplies 13694 Bristol Systems,Inc. $3.200.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 13695 Bureau of National Affairs $1,648.58 Subscription 13696 Burke Engineering Co. $102.37 Electrical Supplies 13897 BNI Building News $525,51 Subscription 136M California Automatic Gate $1,17840 Maintenance Agreement-9 Automatic Gales Pi &P2 Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 81 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13699 California Environmental $25.00 Training Registration 13700 Callan Associates,Inc. $3.550.00 Investment Advisor 13701 Centrepointe Commercial Interior $958.98 Office Furniture 13702 Cale-Parmer Instrument Company $149.53 Lab Supplies 13703 Communication Briefings $79.00 Subscription 13704 Compuserve Incorporated $110.89 Computer Services 13705 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $2,468.99 Electrical Supplies 13706 Contmental-McLaughlin $498.75 Tools 13707 Control Switch $111.63 Electrical Supplies 13708 Convey Development 5304.00 Software License Renewal for 1099 Reporting 13709 Cooper Cameron Corporation $412.01 Engine Supplies 13710 Coral Magazine $24.95 Technical Journal 13711 Corporate Express $4,846.89 Office Supplies 13712 County of Orange $7,56TS4 Underground Tank Fee 13713 CH2MHill $20.000.00 Engineering Services J-31 13714 Daniels Tie Service, $1.550.87 Truck Tires 13715 Dexon Computer,Inc. $895.00 VAX Computer Workstation Hardware 13716 Dun 8 Bradstreet Corp.Foundation $1g8.00 Training Registration 13717 DGA Consultants,Inc. $5.184.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 13718 Electra Bond,Inc. $161.63 Mechanical Supplies 73719 James M.Eta $175.00 Cash Advance-Training Expense V 13720 Enchanter,Inc. $2.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 13721 Enedech $26.50 Freight Charges rt 13722 Enterprise Technologies $11.399.20 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation yj 13723 Experian $267.51 Orange County Property Information 13724 Federal Express Corp. $82.00 Air Freight 13725 Federal Express Corp. $48.50 Air Freight 13726 Fibedron $801.42 Fiber Optic Cable 13727 Filter Supply Company $5.067.53 Fibers 13725 Finnigan Corp $147.39 Service Agreement 13729 Fisher Scientific $1,222.10 Lab Supplies 13730 Fluid Tech.A Div.of FLW Ina $500.50 Instrument Supplies 13731 Fodls Benefit.Insurance Company $17.610.31 Long Term Disability Premium 13732 Fountain Valley Florist $86.83 Employee Bereavement Flowers 13733 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc $525.31 Paint Supplies 13734 Franklin Covey $40.90 Office Supplies 13735 Frys Electronics $559.88 Employee Computer Loan Program 13736 So.Cal.Gas Company $15.101.29 Natural Gas 13737 General Petroleum $8,277.91 Unleaded Gasoline 13738 GTE California $337.16 Telephone Services 13739 YWV Grainger Inc $160.82 Compressor Supplies 13740 Greseby STI $390.03 Engine Supplies 13741 Great American Printing Co. $8.545.91 Printing 13742 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $835.75 Janitorial Supplies 13743 GST,Inc./Micro City $511.46 Office Supplies 13744 GTE $86.41 Telephone Services 13745 GTE $110.00 Telephone Services 13746 Harold Primrose Ice $40.00 Ice For Samples 13747 Hoerbiger Service Inc. $1,890.90 Compressor Pads Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid W1198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13748 The Holman Group $746.92 Employee Assistance Program Premium 13749 Home Depot $759.69 Small Hardware 13750 Hub Auto Supply $276.18 Truck Pads 13751 City of Huntington Beach $1,440.00 Water Use 13752 City of Huntington Beach $16.013.52 Witter Use 13753 HI Standard Automotive $1,649.64 Truck Paris 13754 Idexx $841.08 Lab Pads&Supplies 13755 Imaging Pubs,Inc. $223.60 Office Supplies 13756 Information For Public Affairs $165.00 Training Expense-Video 13757 Inland Empire Equipment,Inc $2.740.61 Truck Supplies 13758 Intelligence Press,Inc. $245.00 Subscription 13759 Intuitive Technology Corporation $5,000.00 Seruice Agreement 13760 Irvine Ranch Water District $198.20 Water Use 13761 ICMA $141.00 Subscription 13762 IDM Controls Inc. $197.82 Equipment Repair 13763 IPCO Safety-Ca $1.663.52 Safety Supplies 13764 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $558.73 Instrument Supplies 13765 Jamison Engineering,Inc $998.00 Equipment Rental 13766 Jay's Catering $50.00 Directors Meeting Expense 13767 Johnstone Supply $121 AS Electrical Supplies 13768 MC do MISCO Southwest $12,786.69 Mechanical Paris It Supplies 13769 Killer Training Centers $2,985.00 Training Registration Y. 13770 Knox Industrial Supplies $5,979.W Tools R 13771 Laborers Inc. $22,000.00 Lab Information Man agement System Software MO 2-26-97 13772 Lasaigraphics $431.01 Computer Software W 13773 LaserAll Corp. 52,146.78 Service Agreement 13774 Leadership Directories $434.95 Subscription 13775 League Of California Cities $540.00 Conference Registration 13776 Lee&No Inc. $5,683.45 Engineering Services 13777 Liquid Handling Systems $159.81 Mechanical Supplies 13778 LA Cellular Telephone Company $1,884.38 Cellular Telephone Service 13779 M&D Machining $770.00 General Electric,A/C Gear Box Supplies 13780 Mar Vac Electronics $16.21 Instrument Supplies 13781 McKenna Engineering&Equipment $285.26 Pump Supplies 13782 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $752.44 Tools 13783 Medlin Controls Co. $237.72 instrument Supplies 13794 MicroAge Computer $9,375.99 Software 13785 Mdway Mfg&Machining Co. $8,639.37 Mechanical Repairs 13786 Mission Uniform Service $3.251.59 Uniform Rentals 13787 Mitsubishi Wireless $100.52 Cellular Telephone Batteries 13788 Michael D.Moore $498.80 Meeting Expense Reimb 13789 MoloPholo $40.19 Photographic Services 13790 MBC Applied Enviraamental Science 54,173.00 Vessel Support for Ocean Monitoring Program 13791 MPS Photographic Services $260.25 Office Supplies 13792 National Plant Services,Inc. $16,975.00 Vacuum Truck Services 13793 National Technology Transfer $18,405.00 Training Registration 13794 Network Catalyst $1,000.00 Computer Supplies 13795 Newark Electronics $751.80 Instrument Suppress 13796 City of Newport Beach $71.76 Water Use Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8131/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13797 North American Crane Bureau $2.480.00 Training Registration 8 Certification Fees 13798 Occupational Vision Services $471.03 Safety Glasses 13799 Office Depot Business Services $2,085.04 Office Supplies 138M Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. $5,298.00 Temporary Employment Services 13801 Orange Coast Pipe Supply $16.67 Plumbing Supplies 13802 Orange County Forum $45.00 Conference Registration 13803 Orange County Wholesale Electric $28.55 Instrument Supplies 13804 Orange VaNe 8 Filing Company $2,700.48 Fillings 13805 Drift Fire Protection $833.00 Service Agreement 13806 Oxygen Service Company $282.00 Specialty Gases 13807 Pacific Bell $1,28381 Telephone Services 13008 Pacific Bell Internet Services $1,151.50 Internet Services 13809 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2.108.55 Plumbing Supplies 13810 Parts Unlimited $327.48 Track Supplies 13811 Patriot Video Productions $344.49 Video Taping Services 13812 Pemiaseal $407.98 Lube Oil 13813 Predate $1,595.00 Computer Software 13814 Pumping Solutions Inc. $162.26 Mechanical Supplies 13815 R 8 R Instrumentation,Inc. $1,069.19 Electrical Supplies 13816 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2.157.61 Trash Removal 13817 Randolph Austin Co. $639.76 Lab Supplies 13818 Restek Corporation $276.90 Training Registration 13819 Robinson Fertilizer Co.,Inc $3.110.38 Groundskeeping Supplies 13820 Rupes-Kennedy Hydraulic, $415.92 Pump P13821 R IN Group.Inc. $6,000.00 CMMS Consulting Services 13822 RPM Electric Motors $535.63 Electric Motor Supplies 13823 Sancon Engineering.Inc. $9,212.50 Engineering Services 131124 Saratoga Institute $1.197.25 Human Resources Financial Report 1998 13825 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. $736,42 Specialty Gases 13826 Sea Water Vlsione $814.59 Chiller 13827 Second-Sun $519.49 Light Fixtures 13828 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $447.24 Tools 138N Shureluck Sales B Engineering $2,363.25 Tools/Hardware 13830 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh $1.000.00 Professional Services 13831 Sigma-Aftich,Inc. $250.30 Lab Supplies 13832 Skater,Inc. $170.12 Pump Supplies 13833 Smith Pipe 8 Supply Inc. $808.43 Plumbing Supplies 13834 South Coast Water $366.96 Office Supplies 13935 Southern California Edison Co. $3,060.16 Power 13836 Southern California Water $61.03 Water Use 13837 Sparklefis $2.128.44 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 13838 Sprint $30.45 Lang Distance Telephone Service 13539 SlateNel $330.00 Seminar Registration 13840 Sterling Art $65.19 Art Supplies 13841 Steven Enterprises,Inc. $920.14 Management Agreement 13842 Summit Steel $1,113.54 Metal 13843 Sunset Ford $148.00 Truck Supplies 13844 Super Chem Corporation $336.78 Chemicals 13845 Swains Electric Motor Service $304.65 Pump Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8131MS Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13US T a C Industrial Controls,Inc $1,663.31 Electrical Supplies 13847 Technic Computer Service Corp. $202.88 Printer Maintenance 13848 Think Earth Environmental Education $7,000.00 Membership 13849 ThirdWave $850.00 Document Management Project Consultant 13850 Thomas Gray 8 Assoc. $432.00 Lab Services 13851 Thomas M.Dawes,P.E. $6.120.00 Professional Services MO 4-23-97 13852 Thompson Industrial Supply $2,809,66 Mechanical Supplies 13853 Robert Tighe $4,800,00 Relocation Expense Project#541-1 13854 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service $344,20 Locks 8 Keys 13855 Edward M.Tones $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting Expense 13856 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River $45.00 Seminar Registration 13857 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. $4.260.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11.94 13858 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $381,08 Truck Supplies 13859 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $854 10 Lab Services 13960 Tustin Dodge $79,65 Truck Supplies 13MI Tuthill Carp $427.85 Valve 13862 US FIIIeriPolymetrics,Inc. $2.525.50 Lab Supplies 13863 USC $25.00 SCEC Ouarledy Newsletter 13864 Valley Cities Supply Company $2,975.57 Plumbing Supplies 1*1 13865 Veme's Plumbing $17.850,00 Plumbing Supplies rS 13066 Village Nurseries $63.26 Landscaping Supplies 13867 Vision Service Plan-(CA) $7.511.70 Vision Service Premium 13868 Vortex Corp. $424,02 Service Agreement-Repair Roll-Up Door rt 13869 VWR Scientific Products $7,483.05 Lab Supplies > 1387D Weather and Wind Instrument Co. 5429.98 Wind Sods Frame to 13871 Wileg Scientific $496,63 Lab Supplies 13872 WyaO Data Services $269.00 1998-99 ECS Geographic Report 13873 Xerox Corporation $12.230,92 Copier Leases 13874 Kirk%pedex Paper 8 Graphics $201.43 Photo Coping Service 13875 Douglas M. Stewart $755.00 Meeting Expense Reimb 13876 John W.Swindler $784.88 Meeting Expense Reimb 13877 Jean E.Tappan $148,50 Reimburse Director Room Charges 13876 Michelle Tuchman 521.90 Cellular Phone Charges 13879 Layne T.BaroMl $520.88 Meeting Expense Reimb 13880 Mark Castillo $1.056.22 Training Expense Reimb 13881 James E.Colston $294.78 Meeting Expense Reimb 13582 Kevin L.Hadden $692.42 Mewling Expense Reimb 13853 Orange County Sanitation Dist. $1,217.92 Petty Cash Reimb. 138M Space Leasing Company $19.618,90 Construction Trailers P240 13885 Yo-U Tsai $2,551.25 Computer Loan 7,013,736.27 Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9/16198 Cho&No. Vendor Amount Description 13910 Dell Marketing L.P. 878,615.00 3-Dell Network Servers-Div.930 13911 Delta Dental $39,072.80 Dental Insurance Plan 13912 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $64,559.66 Natural Gas-Spec AP-170 13913 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan $25,358.56 Medical Insurance Premium 13914 Kemiron Pacific.Inc. $51,924.10 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 13915 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. $555,915.69 Construction 3.38J,2-R-97 13916 Nat West Markets $68,121.69 COP Letter of Credit Fees 13917 NCCI Enterprises.Inc. $48,156.03 Construction Contract 9240 13918 Oracle Corporation $32.303.45 Computer Software-Full Enterprise Edition License 13919 Paciltcere of Ca $43.317.25 Health Insurance Premium 13920 Remedy $28.598.41 Temporary Employment Services 13921 Southern California Edison $45.217.63 Power 13922 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms &33,060.57 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 13923 United HealthCare/More Health $133,184.75 Medical Health Insurance 13924 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $35.810.46 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C444 13925 Advance Constructors Inc. $219.455.10 Construction J-34-1,P2-35-5 13926 Fleming Engineering,Inc. $46,728.33 Sewer Repair MO 6-24-98 13927 County of Orange 546.344.81 Sewer Service Fees 13928 Irvine Ranch Water District $752.807.04 Transfer Connection Fees yr 13929 American Telephone&Telegraph $2,620.08 Long Distance Telephone Services �F 13930 Amercan Telephone&Telegraph E3.00 Long Distance Telephone Services r 1393/ Adamson Industries 5200.08 Lab Supplies - . 13932 Air Cold Supply 8%.26 Ab Conditioner Repairs rT 13933 Airborne Express 618.45 Air Freight pr 13934 Allied Packing&Rubber Inc. SSD7.13 Mechanical Supplies �+ 13935 Allied Supply $214.50 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 13936 American Aidines $6.368.01 Travel Services 13937 Anicem,Inc. $2.505.00 Electrical Parts&Supplies 13938 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 13939 Apce Valve And Primer $8.544.58 Plumbing Supplies 13940 Appleoms Employment Service $969.17 Temporary Employment Services 13941 Applied Industrial Technology 82,24&43 Pump Supplies 13942 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $1.600.00 Lab Supplies 13943 Armor-Vac $3.370.00 Vacuum Truck Services 13944 Atlas Chrysler Plymouth $18,273.32 1998 Dodge Ram Tmtic 13945 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. $330.78 Filters 13946 Azalea Software,Inc. E604.00 Soft are 13947 AMAI/Padgett-Thompson $834.00 Training Expense 13948 American National Standards ANSI $32.00 Publications 13949 Assoc of Metro.Sewerage Agencies $10.00 Training Registration 13950 APEX Communications $8,30129 Equipment Installation-Employee Card Readers 13951 ARB/PERP $100.00 Registration Fees fort Portable Engines 13952 AWWA Annual Conference 5430.D0 Subscription 13953 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $1,301.52 Printing MO 11-7-94 13964 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $5.555.17 Telephone Installation 13955 Battelle-Northwest 52,023.47 Solids Impact Meeting 13956 Baudville $110.36 Flames 13957 BloMerieux Work,Inc. 668.02 Lab Supplies 13958 BicSource Consulting $14.993.90 Consulting Service-Biosolids&Watershed Orange County Sanitation District a Claims Paid 9116190 Check No. Vender Amount Description 13959 Birmingham Controls $350.73 Mechanical Pads S Supplies 13960 Boyle Engineering Corporation $2.496.96 Engineering Services 7-23 13961 Bristol Systems,Inc. $9.000.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 13982 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $900.00 Janitorial Servlcas MO 1.12-94 13953 Buroh Ford $18,407.63 1998 Ford Taurus 13964 Burlington Safely Laboratory $468.00 Testing Services 13965 Bush&Associates Inc. $932.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 13966 California NGV Coalition $500.00 Membership 13967 Calolymplc Safety $6.026.08 Safely Supplies 13968 Carleton Engineers B Consultants $2.460.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality 13969 Carollo Engineers $7,443.49 Engineering Services-P1-38,P243,MO 4.14-93 13970 Cashion,Inc. $815.92 Valve Supplies 13971 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors $2.234.36 Office Furniture 13972 Codified Labs $1,018.35 Lab Supplies 13973 Charles P.Crowley Co. $453.39 Instrument Pads 13974 Chrome Crankshaft Co. $794.00 Pump Supplies 13975 Clean Source $200.42 Janitorial Supplies 13976 Coast Fire Equipment $5.091.90 Service Agreement 13977 Communications Performance Group $9.090.00 Professional Services 13978 Computers America,Inc. $4.639.86 Computer Supplies 13979 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $5,385.97 Electrical Supplies 13980 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. $176.71 Plumbing Supplies 13981 Contlnental-McLaughlin $48.00 Tools hf 13982 Converse Consultants $1.227.80 Consulting Services MO 8.11-93 l 13983 Cooper Cameron Corporation $1,911.18 Engine Supplies 13984 Corporate Expresa $5.983.93 Office Supplies 13985 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. $3,289.07 Mechanical Supplies 13986 The Cri Odet Company $884.00 Training Expense 13987 Culligan Water Conditioning $30.00 Soft Water Service 13988 CH2MHIII $14,336.06 Engineering Services J-31 13989 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection $8.600.40 Lab Supplies 13990 CR 8 R Incorporated $6.300.00 Container Rentals 13991 Dapper Tire Co. $216.47 Track Tires 13992 Dal Mar Analytical $2,394.00 Siosolids Analysis 13993 Dosed Computer,Inc. $8.255.00 Computer Workstation&License Documentation 13994 DeZurick $2223.96 Valves 13995 Dan Maurer $2,345.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 13996 Dun 8 Bradstreet Corp.Foundation $495.00 Training Registration 13997 Duthie Generator Service,Inc. $6.605.00 Generator Supplies 13998 Electra Bond,Inc. $888.94 Mechanical Supplies 13999 Embareadero Technologies,Inc. $6.458.06 5-User License DB Artisan for Oracle Software 14000 Enchanter,Inc. $4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 14001 Enterprise Technologies $3.680.00 Consulting Services-CMMS Implementation 14002 Environmental Resources Association $920.20 Lab Services 14003 Environmental Sampling Supply $342.05 Lab Supplies 14004 ENS Resources,Inc. $4.982.23 Professional Services 14005 Federal Express Corp. $92.70 Air Freight 14006 Fibermn $665.04 Fiber Optic Cable 14007 FileNet Corporation $24,851.98 Computer Software-ION Desktop 2.X,Doe Services Oracle,Annual Mainlenance Agreement Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9116M Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14008 Finnigan Corp $144.21 Service Agreement 14009 Fisher Scientific $656.08 Lab Supplies 14010 Flo,System,Inc. $18.351.71 Pump Supplies 14011 Fountain Valley Camara $57.11 Photo Supplies 14012 City of Fountain Valley $14,355.60 Water Use 14013 Franklin Covey $389.67 GBka Supplies 14014 Frazee Paint and Wascovedlg $390.06 Palm Supplies 14015 Frost Engineering Service Co. $1.303.48 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 14016 Frys Electronics $60.23 Employee Computer Loan Program 14017 FM International,Inc. $7,075.00 RFP for the Engineering Document Management System 14018 Ganahl Lumber Company $220.78 Lumber/Hardware 14019 Garralt-Callahan Company $5.037.31 Chemicals 14020 GTE California $3,500.49 Telephone Services 14021 Goldennest Window Service $1.798.00 Window Cleaning Service 14022 Great American Printing Co. $447.613 Printing 14023 Great Westem Sanitary Supplies $729.38 Janitorial Supplies 14024 GST,Inc.I Micro City $3.216.66 Office Supplies 14025 GTE $93.52 Telephone Services 14026 Haaker Equipment Company $366.31 Truck Supplies 14027 Harald Primrose Ice $96.00 Ice For Samples 14028 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli $153.40 Director's Meeting Expense H. 14029 HI-Tek Timedock Company $143.02 Repair&Maintenance Service-Stromberg Daleffime Stamper ittl 14030 Haerbiger Service Inc. $797.72 Compressor Parts I 14031 Home Depot $278.67 Small Hardware u 14032 Hopkins Technical Products $1.068.76 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 14033 Hub Auto Supply $79.88 Truck Pans 14034 Imaging Plus,Inc. $575.55 OMIca Supplies 14035 Industrial Air Compressor $426.43 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 14036 Infonnallon Resources $1atim Personnel Services 14037 Interstate Battery Systems $656.63 Batteries 14038 Ipswltch Inc. $155.00 Computer Software-4 each of WS-FTP Pro 5.D 14039 Irvine Photo Graphics $13.38 Photographic Servlcas 14040 Irvine Ranch Water District $3.64 Water Use 14041 IBM Corporation $284.75 Service Contract 14042 IBM Corporation $12,353.24 Lease Payment on the AS400 14043 IPCO Safely-Ca $14,426.70 Safety Supplies 14044 ISA Publications $577.00 Subscription 14045 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $3.982.54 Equipment Rental 14D46 Jay's Catering $225.01 Director's Meeting Expense 14047 Johnstone Supply $1,162.34 Electrical Supplies 14048 Frances L.Kaluzny $1.500.00 Consulting Service-Human Resources 14049 Knox Industrial Supplies $3.196.56 Tools 14050 Larkin Inc. $298.50 Service-Recertify Refrigerant Recovery Cylinders 14051 LaserAll Corp. $285.18 Service Agreement 14052 LeMOMe Company $148.27 Sulfide Teal Kit 14053 Lessons in Leadership $445.00 Seminar Registration 14054 Lexis-Neils $724.37 Subscription 14055 LA Cellular Telephone Company $840.74 Cellular Telephone Service 14056 Mag Systems $859.05 Electrical Supplies Orange County Sanitation District u Claims Paid 9116198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14057 Maintenance Technology Corp. $701.75 Welding Supplies 14058 Mandic Motors $46.00 Towing Services 14059 Mar Vac Ehrcronic5 $1.518.70 Instrument Supplies 14060 Mad Chlor Inc. $1.482.82 Ferric Chloride Supplies 14061 Mc Junkin Corp $724.08 Plumbing Supplies 14062 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. $2.841.69 Tools 14063 Measurement Variables,Inc. $782.50 Fillers 14064 MlcmAge Computer $3,406.52 Software 14065 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. $4.309.13 Mechanical Repairs 14066 Mission Uniform Service $3,154.15 Uniform Rentals 14D67 Mitchell Repair Information Co. $354.50 Subscription 14D68 Monitor Labs,Inc. $978.93 Instruments 14069 The Minster Board $175.00 Job Posting on the Internet 14070 Montgomery Watson $1.379.75 Air Toxica Project MO 12-12-90 14071 Moreland&Associates $19.176.25 Auditing Services MO 3.8.95 14072 MPS Photographic Services $19.94 Office Supplies 14073 N.Glanta&Son $813.85 Tools 14074 National Microcemp Services 52,045.00 Service Agreement 14075 National Plant Services,Inc. $3,475.00 Vacuum Truck Services 74076 National Research Council Canada $325.60 Subscription 14077 National Seminars Group $199.00 Seminar Registration 14078 National Technology Transfer $2.955.00 Training Registration 14079 Neal Supply Co. $1.638.88 Plumbing Supplies 14080 Network Catalyst $2,994.37 Computer Supplies cej 14081 New Horizons Computer Learning $1.590.00 Software Training Classes 'P 14082 Nextel Communications $5.108.58 Cellular Phones&Air Time 14083 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. $19,874.10 LubritsmUDiesel Fuel 14084 The Norco Companies $111.00 Mail Delivery Service 14085 NAB Associates,Inc. $4,417.75 Service Agreement-1998 Regional Monitoring Program 14086 O.C.Council of Government $25.00 Meeting Expense 14087 Occupational Vision Services $349.09 Safety Glasses 14088 Office Depot Business Services $1.249.19 Office Supplies 14089 Office Pavillion $841.50 Office Furniture Repairs 14090 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. $960.00 Temporary Employment Services 14091 Olympic Creations $1.581.20 OCSD logo pins 14D92 Operation Technology,Inc. $11.391.25 Computer Software 14093 Orange County Sanitation District $0.41 Petty Cash Reimb. 14094 Orange County Water Distnc $7.010.00 Toilet Exchange Program 14095 Orange County Wholesale Electric $4.665.07 Instrument Supplies 14096 Orange Valve&Fitting Company $22.09 Fittings 14097 Oxygen Service Company $1.886.64 Specialty Gases 14098 OCB Reprographics $2.175.93 Blueprinting&Photocopying Service-Spec.4P-173 14099 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. $7,734.41 Electrical Supplies 14100 Pacific Bell $1.151.50 Telephone Services 14101 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2,774.61 Plumbing Supplies 14102 Pacific Pads and Controls $13.925.83 Instrument Supplies 14103 Padgett-Thompson $710.00 Seminar Registration 14104 Padre Janitorial Supplies $214.97 Janitorial Supplies 14105 Pagenel $3,69BA6 Rental Equipment Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9116/96 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14106 Parallax Education $50.00 Training Expense 14107 Parkhouse Tire Inc. $1,929.36 Time 14108 Pads Unlimited $568.38 Truck Supplies 14109 Petco Animal Supplies $47.35 Lab Supplies 14110 Pima Gro Systems Inc. $20,125.62 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.96 14111 Presidium Inc. $4,166.66 Workers Comp.Claims Admin. 14112 Pumping Solutions Inc. $75.03 Mechanical Supplies 14113 Putimeisler,Inc. $800.64 Pump Supplies 14114 Quantena.Inc. $1,650.00 Analytical Service 14115 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2,157.61 Trash Removal 14116 Realtime Systems Corporation $4,085.00 Integration&Support Services 14117 Reliastar $15,248.44 Life Insurance Premium 14118 Robedo's Auto Trim Shop $221.94 Auto Repair 14119 Ronan Engineering Co. $172.32 Electrical Pads&Supplies 14120 Rosen's Electrical Equipment $400.00 Electrical Supplies 14121 Ryan Herco Products Corp. $1.047.48 Metal 14122 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc, $9g5.00 Engineering Services 14123 Santa Ana River Flood Protection $1,400.00 Membership 14124 Schwing America,Inc. $66.63 Pump Supplies 14125 Scott,Reilly&Whitehead $64.75 Legal Services-Personnel Issues 14126 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. $218.00 Lab Repairs 14127 Seagate Software $8.000.00 Training Fee M 14128 City of Seal Beach $110.48 Water Use m 14129 Second-Sun $2.621.76 Light Fixtures l - 14130 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc $91.20 Tools 14131 Shimadiu Scientific Instrument $104.52 Lab Supplies 14132 Shuraluck Sales&Engineering $2,446.78 Tools/Hardware 14133 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh $3.000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 14134 Skafloath Seminars $99.00 On-Site Training 14135 Sludge Newsletter $409.00 Subscription 14136 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc $80.11 Plumbing Supplies 14137 So.Cal.Gas Company $6,617.33 Natural Gas 14138 South Coast Air Duality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees 14139 South Coast Air Duality Mngt. $152.10 Permit Fees 14140 South Coast Air Duality Mngt. $9.746.40 Permit Fees 14141 South Coast Air Duality Mngt. $11.892.00 Permit Fees 14142 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $4.038.80 Permit Fees 14143 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees 14144 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees 14145 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees 14146 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees 14147 Southern California Edison $7.128.87 Power 14148 Southern California Marine Institute $1.560.00 Rental Equipment 14149 Sparkletts $2,280.33 Drinking Waler/Cooler Rentals 14150 Standard Supply&Equipment Co. $46.80 Pump Supplies 14161 State Chemical Mfg.Co. $700.00 Janitorial Supplies 14152 Steven Enterprises,Inc. $47.26 Management Agreement 14153 Strata International,Inc. $926.98 Chemicals Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9116198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14154 Summit Steel $370.22 Metal 14155 Sun-Batt Landscape&Maintenance $4.420.00 Landscape Maintenance 14156 Sunset Ford $200.15 Truck Supplies 14157 Swains Electric Motor Service $487.36 Pump 14158 SETAC $600.00 Subscription 14159 The Register $810.95 Notices&Ads 14160 Thompson Industrial Supply $605.54 Mechanical Supplies 14161 Time Warner Communications $40.47 Cable Services 14162 Aamfund Financial/Top Hal Productions $96.65 Directors Meeting Expense 14163 T&Stale Seminar On-me-River $40.OD Seminar Regislralion 14164 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. $7.770.00 Contract Groundskeeping M05.11-94 14165 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. $53.82 Truck Supplies 14166 Truesdell Laboratories.Inc. $2,644.00 Lab Services 14167 Trs Tropical Fish $1,269.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 14168 Union Dodge $18.389.69 1999 Dodge Ram Truck 14169 The Unisource Corporation $6,255.29 Office Supplies 14170 United Parcel Service $26.28 Parcel Services 14171 ULI $24.95 Publication 14172 Valley Cities Supply Company $3.548.05 Plumbing Supplies 14173 VWR Scientific Products $1.144.20 Lab Supplies 14174 The Wackenhut Corporation $12.235.51 Security Guards 14175 Wayne Electric Co. $315.58 Electrical Supplies N 14176 Western Slates Chemical Inc. $23.734.36 Caustic Soda Solution C-038 tn 14IT7 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $715.00 Consulting Services m 14178 Xerox Corporation $8.903.93 Copier Leases 14179 CNA Trust $24.383.90 Construction Contract d 541-1 14180 Vemw's Plumbing $19.035.00 Plumbing Supplies 14181 Donald F.McIntyre $571.98 Mewling Expense Reimb. 14182 Michael D.Moore $426.96 Training Expense Reimb. 14183 Peter M.Mordent, $657.18 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14184 Orange County Sanitation District $4,748.27 Workers Comp.Reimb. 14185 Douglas M.Stewart $755.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14186 Edward M.Tones $347.75 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14187 Burke Anderson $118.91 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14188 Layne T.Biracial $438.85 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14189 Molly Barons $2,400.00 Settlement Claim 97-CSD.98.L-2 14190 Jeffrey Brown $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting 14191 County of Orange $5,505.00 Supplemental Senator Service Fee&Cancellations 14192 Chloe D.Coo $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting 14193 Vladimir A.Kogan $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting 14194 Orange County Sanitation District $360.77 Petty Cash Reimb. 14195 Orrick,Herrington&Sutcliffe $7.500.00 Profamonal Services 14196 Public Financial Management $7,500.00 Certificate of Participation-1990-92 Series'C'Arbitrage Management Program 14197 U.S.Postal Service $5,000.00 Postage 14198 Pacft Bell $20.36 Telephone Services 3,2 Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 913W8 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14227 The Vantage Group,Inc. $53,618.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 14228 the Gro Division $26,148.40 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95 14229 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $167,159.00 Engineering Services J40.1,J40-2 14230 Carollo Engineers $67,041.16 Engineering Services P1.60&P2-50 14231 Dail Marketing L.P. $90,320.51 Computers-2-Network Servers+6-Computers-Div 930 14232 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $76,884.80 Natural Gas 14233 Holmes&Narver Inc. $26.871.43 Engineering Services 241 14234 James Martin&Co. $83.757.50 Data Integration ProJecl 14235 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. $102.188.95 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 14236 Orange County Water District $46.353.60 Green Acres Proect Water Use MO 6.9-93 14237 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. $93,258.68 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 14238 Polydyne,Inc. $170,893.00 Callonic Polymer MO 3-11-92 14239 Power Distributors,Inc. $36.450.00 Lghling Fixtures Installation 14240 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. $59,425.06 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 14241 Southern California Edison $67.653.27 Power 14242 Tula RanchiMagan Farms $75.116.77 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 14243 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart $75.730.88 Legal Services 14244 Margate Construction Inc. $158,935.50 Construction P7-36-2 14245 American Telephone&Telegraph $12.64 Long Distance Telephone Services 74246 American Telephone&Telegraph $25.16 Long Distance Telephone Services 14247 American Telephone&Telegraph $1.285.14 Long Distance Telephone Services 14248 Able Equipment Rental $647.09 Equipment Rental M 14249 Action Bearing $670.26 Mechanical Supplies f] 14250 Advance Aluminum&Brass $19,896.00 Mechanical Supplies r 14251 Allied Packing&Rubber Inc. $339.79 Mechanical Supplies 14252 Allied Supply Co. $134.64 Plumbing Supplies 14253 Allied Supply $837.73 Mechanical Supplies 14254 American Airlines $5.270.46 Travel Services 14255 American Payroll Association $125.00 Membership 14256 American Sigma,Inc. $18.80 Mechanical Supplies 14257 American Sigma,Inc. $18,716.20 Mechanical Supplies 14258 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $575.00 Service Agreement 14259 Appleane Employment Service $7,643.34 Temporary Employment Services 14260 Applied Industrial Technology $94.26 Pump Supplies 14261 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $325.00 Lab Supplies 14262 Awards&Trophies By Bea $322.71 Plaques 14263 AKM Consulting Engineers $12,173.36 Consulting Services 11-20 14264 AMAI/Padgett-Thompson $395.00 Training Expense 14265 API Fund For Payroll Education $618.00 Training Expense 14266 AWSI $256.00 D.O.T.Training Program 14267 Bailey Fischer&Porter Company $187.67 Electrical Supplies 14288 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $1,559.21 Printing MO 11-7-94 14269 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $3,200.32 Telephone Installation 14270 Bauer Compressors $116.24 Compressor Supplies 14271 Beckman Instruments,Inc. 5445.15 Lab Supplies 14272 Black Box Corporation $506.24 Computer Supplies 14273 Boise Radiator Service $264.30 Truck Repairs 14274 Boyle Engineering Corporation $21,635.82 Engineering Services 7-23 14275 Bristol Systems,Inc. $9,600.00 Consulting Services-V21k Project a a� a Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9/3W8 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14275 BrBhinee Electric $165.08 Electrical Supplies 14277 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $8,110.00 Janitorial Services MO 1.12-94 14278 BNI Building News $21a.37 Subscription 14279 California Auto Refrigeration $352.33 Service Agreement 14280 California Relocation Services $156.00 Moving Services 14281 Celtrol,Inc. $2.988.15 Hardware 14282 Cashes,Inc. $2.679.58 Valve Supplies 14283 Century Paint $240.10 Paint Supplies 14284 Charles P.Crowley Co, $656.45 Instrument Pads 14285 Chrome Crankshaft Co. $240.00 Pump Supplies 14286 City Office Furniture,Inc. $371.68 Office Furniture 14287 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. $220.24 Office Supplies 14288 Compressor Components Of Calif. $1.745.55 Pump Supplies 14289 Computers America,Inc. $358.74 Computer Supplies 14290 Connell GM Pads $44.39 Truck Supplies 14291 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. $2.188.99 Electrical Supplies 14292 Cooper Cameron Corporation $2,349.97 Engine Supplies 14293 Copelco Capital,Inc. $2,864.00 Copier Lease 14294 Corporate Express Imaging $442.54 Instrument Supplies 14295 Corporate Express $5.022.43 Office Supplies 14296 Cost Containment Solutions $500.96 Workers Compensation Services 14297 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $91.97 Truck Pads 14296 Cylec Industries $16.241.35 Anionic Polymer 14299 CH2M HILL $3.055.62 Engineering Services J-31 N14300 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection $713.15 Lab Supplies 14301 CPI-The Alternative Supplier $4,728.13 Lab Supplies 14302 CS Company $240.00 Plumbing Supplies 14303 CWEA 1998 Conference $350.00 Conference Registration 14304 Davis Instruments $505.12 Mechanical Supplies 14305 DeZurick $777.70 Valves 14306 Dickmns Inc. $933.12 Electrical Supplies 14307 Dover Elevator Company $1,203.60 Elevator Maintenance 14308 Dupont Engineered Services $14.500.00 Painting Maintenance Services MO 4.22-98 14309 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. $122.00 Medical Screening 14310 Electra Band,Inc. $404.06 Mechanical Supplies 14311 Elsevier Science $821.00 Subscription 14312 Emergency Management Network,Inc. $2.000.00 CPPJFbst Aid Training 14313 Enchanter,Inc. $5,000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 14314 EMAT West'98 $335.00 Registration Fees 14315 EDE International,Inc. $6,932.50 Risk Assessment-Y21,Protect 14316 Federal Express Corp. $111.55 Air Freight 14317 Flbedron $981.95 Fiber Optic Cable 14318 FNaNET Corporation $2,742.01 Computer Software B IDM Desktop Training Expense 14319 Fisher Scientific $1,213.37 Lab Supplies 14320 Flo-Systems,Inc. $75.52 Pump Supplies 14321 Franklin Covey $490.91 OBIce Supplies 14322 Fry'sElectronics $183.12 Computer Supplies 14323 City of Fullerton $459.75 Water Use 14324 FLW Inc. $414.40 Electrical Supplies Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9/30/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14325 G.E.Supply Company $8,896.60 Electric Parts 14326 Ganahl Lumber Company $2,271.95 Lumber/Hardware 14327 Garra0-Callahan Company $1,410.99 Chemicals 14328 Gouge Repair Service $204.31 Gauge Repair 14329 General Binding Corporation $470.77 Maintenance Agreement 14330 GTE California $6,153.47 Telephone Services 14331 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. $556.72 Pump Supplies 14332 Government Institutes Inc. $95.00 Publication 14333 VWy Grainger Inc. $1.254.75 Compressor Supplies 14334 Great American Printing Co. $4.176.87 Printing 14335 Guy L.Warden 8 Sons $81.91 Compressor Supplies 14336 GST,Inc./Micro City $2.305.14 Office Supplies 14337 Hach Company $382.81 Lob Supplies 14338 Harrington Industrial Plastics $617.74 Plumbing Supplies 14339 Hello Direct.Inc. $868.16 Telephone Headsets 14340 Here's Blockforesl Bakery $101.40 Director's Meeting Expense 14341 Hewlett-Packard $2,456.70 Service Agreement 14342 HIIIi Inc. $2,641.47 Tools 14343 Hoerblger Service Inc. $1.333.09 Compressor Parts 143" The Holman Group $745.50 Employee Assistance Program Premium 14345 Hub Auto Supply $20.27 Truck Parts 14346 City of Huntington Beach $16.013.07 Water Use M 14347 HI Standard Automotive $407.41 Truck Parts n 14348 Ideal Scanners 8 Systems $926.00 Software w 14349 Industrial Threaded Products.Inc. $127.26 Connectors 14350 InfoEdge Inc. $585.00 Computer Supplies 14351 Inland Empire Equipment.Inc. $211.24 Truck Supplies 14352 International Mascot Corporation $2,000.00 Equipment Rental 14353 Irvine Ranch Water District $55.14 Water Use 14354 City of Irvine $178.68 Inspection Services 14365 law,Inc. $88.11 Instruments 14356 IBM Corporation $5,177.38 Service Contract 14357 IDM Controls Inc. $8.142.14 Equipment Repair 14358 IPCO Safety-Ca $447.65 Safety Supplies 14359 ISA Expo/98 $90.00 Registration Fees 14360 J.G.Tucker and Sm.Inc. $591.66 Instrument Supplies 14361 J.L.Winged Co. $101.15 Electrical Supplies 14362 Jay's Catering $766.69 Directors Meeting Expense 14363 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. $5,125.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 14364 Kahl Scientific Instruments $191.56 Lab Supplies 14365 Kelar Training Centers $2.985.00 Registration Fees 14366 Knox Industrial Supplies $927.48 Tools 14367 LaserAll Corp. $557.82 Service Agreement 14368 Liquid Handling Systems $4.31 Mechanical Supplies 14369 LA Cellular Telephone Company $1,957.52 Cellular Telephone Service 14370 M.E.Sllbermenn Co. $22,373.53 Sewer Repair 14371 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers $1,615.00 Engineering Services 2-37 14372 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $911.15 Tools 14373 Motor.Inc. $7,500.00 Consulling Services-Source Control Dale Integration Project ar } Qarlga County Sanitation District Clothes Paid 9/30/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14374 Micro Flex 57,204.00 Gloves 14375 MlcroAge Computer $3,701.55 Computer Supples-1-HP Printer 8 1-Print Server 14376 Mission Uniform Service $3,372.42 Uniform Rentals 14377 Morton Sall $283.99 Salt 14378 MotoPhoto $55.01 Photographic Services 14379 MGD Technologies,Inc. $9,850.00 Maintenance Agreement 14380 MPS Photographic Services $17.79 Office Supplies 14351 National Fire Protection $525.00 Membership Renewal Fees 14382 National Seminars Group $199.00 Seminar Registration 14383 Network Construction Services $9,640.00 Construction Services-Wiring 14384 Network Solutions Group $780.00 Lab Services 14385 City of Newport Beach $10,288.25 Constroclien Services-PCH/Newport Blvd.Interchange Improvements 14386 Nexlel Communications $816.81 Cellular Phones 8 Air time 14387 Nickey Petroleum Co.Inc. $19,739.83 LubrlcentrDiesel Fuel 14388 NAB Associates,Inc $034.50 Service Agreement-1998 Regional Monitoring Program 14389 NOV Ecotrans Group,LLC $114.09 Publications 14390 Office Depot Business Services $4,484.47 Office Supplies 14391 Olsten Stalling Service,Inc. $2.826.00 Temporary Employment Services 14392 Oracle Corporation $3,636.00 Software-Training 14393 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. $53.93 Instrument Supplies 14394 Orange Courier $10.60 Courier Services 14395 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company $85.75 Fittings n 14396 Oxygen Service Company 52,150.18 Specialty Gases t7 14397 DAG $961.19 Software License l� 14398 Pacific Bell $1,278.41 Telephone Services 14399 Pacific Mechanical Supply $1,143.27 Plumbing Supplies 14400 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. 34,599.64 Instrument Supplies 14401 Pads Unlimited $110.56 Truck Supplies 14402 Pitney Bowes $336.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement 14403 Presidium lnc. $2.083.33 Workees Comp.Claims Admin. 14404 Primavera $15,181.20 Consulting Servces 14405 Pyramid Fence Company,Inc. $6,301.00 Fencing Installation 14406 PCS Express $123.00 Courler Services 14407 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2.157.61 Trash Removal 14408 Ralnin Instmment Co.,Inc. $412.02 Lab Supplies 14409 Reliaslar $8,128.00 Life Insurance Premium 14410 Reliaslar Bankers Security Life Ins. $5.183.40 Life Insurance Premium 14411 Remedy $9.954.84 Temporary Employment Services 14412 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop $112.71 Auto Repair 14413 Rosen's Electrical E9uipmenl Co. $538.75 Elecirical Supplies 14414 RJN Group,Inc. $6.082.50 CMMS Consulting Services 14415 RPM Electric Motors $161.83 Electric Motor Supplies 14416 HIS Hughes Co.,Inc. SS01.81 Paint Supplies 14417 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. $598.05 Specialty Gases 14418 Scott.Reilly B Whitehead $342.33 Legal Services-Personnel Issues 14419 Sea Water Visions $165.51 Chiller 14420 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. $335.00 Lab Repairs 14421 Seagate Software $1.275.00 Training Fee 14422 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering $1,833.36 ToolsrHardware Orange County Sensation District Claims Paid 9130I96 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14423 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. $502.78 Lab Supplies 14424 Skyline Displays of Orange County,Inc. $2,112.51 Halogen Light Set 14425 Smith Pipe 8 Supply Inc. $275.86 Plumbing Supplies 14426 Snap-On Incorporated $242.39 Tools 14427 So.Cal.Gas Company $13,045.30 Natural Gas 14428 South Coast Water $170.00 Water System Maint.Agreement 14429 Spex Cedprep Inc. $359.67 Lab Supplies 14430 Sprint $34.95 Long Distance Telephone Service 14431 Square D Company $5.969.44 Software License Agreement 14432 Slate Chemical Mfg.Co. $156.51 Janitorial Supplies 14433 Steve Caserta Construction Co. $9,076.86 Construction Services-Street Repair 14434 Strata International,Inc. $926.98 Chemicals 14435 Summit Steel 5444.02 Metal 14436 Sun-Belt Landscape B Maintenance $5,425.00 Landscape Maint. 14437 Sunset Ford $213.57 Truck Supplies 14438 Swains Electric Motor Service $223.91 Pump 14439 Peer A.Swan $25.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14440 Taylor Industrial Software $5,035.00 Service Agreement 14441 Thomas Gray S Assoc. $330.00 Lab Services �J 14442 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $294.83 Mechanical Supplies 14443 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. $131.53 Truck Supplies 14444 Underground Service Alert of So.Callf. $275.00 Membership w 14445 Union Bank of California $104.69 Account Analysis rr 14446 Union Dodge $20,239.76 1998 Dodge Truck jt 14447 United Parcel Service $588.03 Parcel Services rn 14448 University Products,Inc. $74.10 Office Supplies 14449 Valley Cities Supply Company $3,56949 Plumbing Supplies 14450 VernWs Plumbing $3,490.00 Plumbing Supplies 14451 VWR Scientific Products $9,459.89 Lab Supplies 14452 The Wackenhut Corporation $9,160.48 Security Guards 14453 Weather and Wind Instrument Co. $475.72 Wind Sock Frame 14454 West Coast Safety Supply Co, $391.75 Tools 14455 Weslmx International $16.57 Mechanical Supplies 14456 Xerox Corporation $5,923.91 Copier Leases 14457 3CMA $540.00 Registration Fees 14458 Systems Integrated $12,471.84 Construction Services J-31-3 14459 Nicholas J.Arhonles $100.00 Training Expense Reimb. 14460 Layne T.Baroldi $399.39 Training Expense Reimb. 14461 Shabbir S.Basmi $951.79 Training Expense Reimb. 14462 Eva M.Bradford $57.85 Director Meeting Expense Reimb. 14463 Patrick B.Carnahan $205.28 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14464 David M.Chafe $599.54 Training Expense Reimb. 1"65 John B. Falkenstein $1,302.31 Inspection Travel Expense Reimb. 14466 Michelle R.Hetherington $353.90 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14467 David A.Ludwin $605.00 Registration Fee Reknb. 14468 James McCann $19001 Training Expense Reimb. 14469 Peter M.Morrison $250.00 Training Expense Reimb. 14470 Robert Ooten $252.53 Meeting Expense Reimb. q Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9130198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14471 Charles E.Reed $411.27 Training Expense Reimb. 14472 Dale E.Sparks $322.80 Training Expense Reimb. 14473 Antonio S.Valenzuela $468.05 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14474 Paula A.Zeller $368.74 Training Expense Reimb. 14475 County of Orange $2,790.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 14476 Dell Computer Corporation&Brad Cagle $2,980A2 Employee Computer Loan Program 14477 James E.Hauler $2.314.79 Employee Computer Loan Program 14478 Stephen V.Kozak $330.00 Training Expense Reimb. 14479 Orange Computer Systems&Victor Salinas $1,542.92 Employee Computer Loan Program 1"80 Orange County Sanitation District $4W.34 Petty Cash Reimb. 14481 Cooper Cameron Corporation $650.00 Engine Supplies 2,074, 550.67 r� P W fr n Ch BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mmbng Date I road.ort»r. 11/18/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Number I QMPMber Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A \vaMVnat\yygNnVNabiOpe\WPFILES`[Iaingatl M[ Page t ATTACHMENTS e 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 10/1/98 -10/15/98 & 10/16/98— 10/31/98. BA a.w.a bwm Page <tq - Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011/98 - 10115/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 14482 Barry C. Groveman, Esq. $ 15,000.00 Expert Witness Fees 14483 Isiah J.Mitchell 50,000.00 EEOC Settlement 8 Release Claim#J-CSD-98-L-11 14484 Carollo Engineers 59,880.63 Engineering Services-Pt-38,P243, MO 4.14-93 14485 Orange County Sanitation District 386,354.54 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 14486 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 89,062.51 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 14487 Western Stales Chemical Inc. 46.409.02 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 14488 Court Order 212.50 Wage Garnishment 14489 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment 14490 Brown and Caldwell 3,713.88 Construction Contract MO 7-24-96 14491 Bush 8 Associates Inc. 18,654.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 14492 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment 14493 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 14494 CASA 175.00 Conference Registration 14495 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment 14496 DGA Consultants, Inc. 3,694.62 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 14497 Franchise Tax Board 522.24 Wage Garnishment 14498 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 14499 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 COP Arbitrage Rebate 14500 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,788.75 Dues Deduction 14501 IPCO Safety-Ca 766.85 Safety Supplies 14502 Labware Inc. 1.500.00 Lab Information Management System Software MO 2-26-97 14503 Lee 8 Ro Inc. 21,998.90 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-93 14504 Lessons in Leadership 1,275.00 Seminar Registration 14505 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 664.70 Tools 14506 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange 7,010.00 ULFT Program 14507 Office Depot Business Services 3,436.35 Office Supplies 14508 Orange County Family Support 1.188.78 Wage Garnishment 14509 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 14510 OCEA 582.62 Dues Deduction 14511 Pacific Mechanical Supply 555.05 Plumbing Supplies 14512 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment 14513 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 14514 Peace Officers Council of CA 837.00 Dues Deduction 14616 Precision Backhoe 6,622.80 Equipment Rental 14516 RJN Group, Inc. 9,000.00 CMMS Consulting Services 14517 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 334.80 Specialty Gases 11191M8 1:50 PM BA Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-96.xls Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011198 - 10115198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14518 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 139.59 Tools 14519 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 576.64 Tools/Hardware 14520 Snap-On Incorporated 235.96 Tools 14521 State of California 95.42 Hazardous Waste Tax 14522 Summit Steel 1,098.29 Metal 14523 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 202.32 Mechanical Supplies 14624 Mary S.Thompson 116.85 Training Expense Ralmb. 14525 Lisa L. Tomko 300.00 Training Expense Reimb. 14526 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions 14527 Valcom 2,988.45 Software 14528 Tadao G.Vitko 151.80 Training Expense Reimb. 14529 Nicholas J.Arhontes 102.46 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14530 Bradley H. Cagle 223.76 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14531 Barbara A. Collins 144.98 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14532 Ronald L. Dewitt,Jr. 275.29 Training Expense Reimb. 14533 Rick B. Russell 708.39 Training Expense Reimb. 14534 Operation Technology, Inc. 890.00 Computer Software 14535 Allied Supply Company 40,401.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 14536 IPI'GrammTech, Inc. 76,875.00 Computer Software-PowerMart Suite needed for Data Warehouselintegration 14537 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 25,816.20 Sewer Emergency Repair 300 8 of 24"D.I.P. in Zone 5 14538 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,358.56 Medical Insurance Premium 14539 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 50,554.80 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 14540 Network Catalyst 43,730.35 (14)3 COM Computer Networking Hubs 14541 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 29,604.39 Instrument Supplies 14542 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 139,770.48 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 14543 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 37,176.67 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 14544 United HealthCare/Metra Health 132,963.79 Medical Health Insurance 14545 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 172,973.90 Construction J-34-1, P2-35-5 14646 First Fire Systems, Inc. 115,85C92 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-25-98 14547 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 28,461.72 Construction 7-17 14548 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. 258,275.25 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 14549 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 96,962.85 Construction Contract is 2-40 14550 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 195,866.10 Construction 7-7-1 14551 American Telephone&Telegraph 3.404.02 Long Distance Telephone Services 14552 American Telephone&Telegraph 2.19 Long Distance Telephone Services 14553 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 22,921.02 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89 14554 Airborne Express 63.45 Air Freight 14555 Allied Electronics, Inc. 156.32 Electrical Supplies 11/9198 1:50 PM BA Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98-.%!�sv Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011198 - 10/16/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14556 American Seals West 21.55 Gaskets 14557 American Sigma, Inc. 17,516.36 Mechanical Supplies 14558 Anixter Inc. 4,373.25 Computer Supplies 14559 Appleone Employment Service 4,616.37 Temporary Employment Services 14560 Applied Industrial Technology 984.98 Pump Supplies 14561 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 4,500.00 Lab Supplies 14562 Arizona Instrument 1,267.90 Instrument Supplies 14563 Armor-Vac 1,738.00 Vacuum Truck Services 14564 Arrow Cranehoist Corp. 43.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 14565 Asco Services 2,497.64 Emergency Repair of Transfer Switch-Bay Bridge Pump Station 14566 Aurora Data Systems 11,495.00 MSDS Pro Enterprise Version& Service Agreement-Intranet Project 14567 Awards&Trophies By Bea 105.73 Plaques 14568 ABL,Inc. 199.00 Subscription 14569 Assoc of Melro.Sewerage Agencies 905.00 Training Registration 14570 APEX Communications 6,534.87 Communication Equipment Upgrade 14571 Banana Blueprint, Inc. 1.975.87 Printing MO 11-7-94 14572 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 2,992.16 Telephone Installation 14573 Battery Specialties 173.78 Batteries 14574 Ben Franklin Crafts 39.67 Award 14575 BioSphencal Instruments Inc. 9.32 Electrical Supplies 14576 Black Box Corporation 6.729.15 Computer Supplies 14577 Bristol Systems, Inc. 12,000.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 14578 Builders Book, Inc. 45.54 Subscription 14579 BNI Building News 531.00 Subscription 14580 BOC Edwards 765.85 Lab Supplies 14561 California Municipal Statistics, Inc. 425.00 Computation of OCSO Direct&Overlapping Debt 14582 Callrol, Inc. 434.52 Hardware 14583 Camali Corp. 4,562.50 Service Agreement 14584 Cad Warren&Co. 1,094.31 Insurance Claims Administrator 14585 Centrepointe Commercial Interior 7,499.41 Office Furniture 14586 Cerfnet 20.00 Computer Services 14587 Charles P. Crowley Co. 655.71 Instrument Parts 14588 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas 8,370,75 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP 14589 City of Costa Mesa 2,508.00 Service Contract-Fairview Road Rehabilitation 14590 City of Fullerton 2.500.00 Water Use 14591 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 2,104.84 Professional Services 14592 Cale-Parmer Instrument Company 168.25 Lab Supplies 14593 Computers America, Inc. 1,576.15 Computer Supplies 1119198 1:50 PM BA Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xis Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 10/1198 - 10/15198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14594 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 6,123.59 Electrical Supplies 14595 Consolidated Freightways 430.51 Freight 14596 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 762.87 Plumbing Supplies 14597 Converse Consultants 102.00 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 14598 Cooper Cameron Corporation 1.542.24 Engine Supplies 14599 Corporate Express Imaging 158.65 Instrument Supplies 14600 Corporate Express 654.88 Once Supplies 14601 CorDax/Bentley Systems, Inc. 4,D40.63 Computer Software for Plant Automation/Reinvention Project If J42 14602 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 46.31 Truck Parts 14603 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 146.53 Mechanical Supplies 14604 County of Orange 2,898.91 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 14605 County Wholesale Electric Co. 259.68 Electrical Supplies 14606 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 1,313.10 Lab Supplies 14607 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 922.37 Lab Supplies 14608 Datavault 320.50 OBske Back-Up Tape Storage 14609 Dell Marketing L.P. 15,192.78 6 Computer Workstations 14610 DeZurick 1,512.81 Valves 14811 Dover Elevator Company 1,203.60 - Elevator Maintenance 14612 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 386.82 Paint Supplies 14613 Electra Bond, Inc. 560.30 Mechanical Supplies 14814 Elsevier Science 589.00 Subscription 14615 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 14616 EIS Electrical Insulation Supply 157.68 Electrical Supplies 14617 Federal Express Corp. 56.35 Air Freight 14618 Filter Supply Company 674.28 Filters 14619 Fisher Scientific 720.96 Lab Supplies 14620 Flo-Systems, Inc. 1,838.97 Pump Supplies 14621 Forked Engineering 8 Surveying 10,455.00 Engineering Services P-150 14622 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,689.31 Lang Term Disability Premium 14623 Fountain Valley Camera 47.20 Photo Supplies 14624 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 732.19 Paint Supplies 14625 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 396.00 Truck Wash Tickets 14626 Franklin Covey Co. 229.00 Training Registration 14627 Fry's Electronics 2.944.24 Computer Supplies 14628 GTE California 3,589.09 Telephone Services 14629 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 10.00 Pump Supplies 14630 WW Grainger Inc. 1,416.49 Compressor Supplies 14631 Graphic Distributors 818.00 Photographic Supplies 1119/98 1:50 PM BA Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98cs Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 10/1198 - 10115/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14632 Graseby STI 2,494.10 Engine Supplies 14633 Graybar Electric Company 15,269.58 Electrical Supplies 14634 Great American Printing Co. 1,428.20 Printing Service 14635 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 511.15 Janitorial Supplies 14636 Haaker Equipment Company 2,618.04 Truck Supplies 14637 Hach Company 69.08 Lab Supplies 14638 Harbour Engineering Group 2.911.10 Mechanical Parts 14639 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples 14640 Harrington Industrial Plastics 480.73 Plumbing Supplies 14641 Hatch&Kirk Inc. 5,947.15 Truck Supplies 14642 Herb's Blackforest Bakery& Deli 462.20 Training Expense for Catering-Div 720&730 14643 Hoerbiger Service Inc. 1,347.50 Compressor Parts 14644 The Holman Group 738.40 Employee Assistance Program Premium 14645 Home Depot 352.52 Small Hardware 14646 Hub Auto Supply 275.46 Truck Parts 14647 Huntington Beach Library 185.50 Meeting Room Renal Fee 14648 HI Standard Automotive 1,677.11 Truck Parts 14649 Idexx 1.622.87 Lab Supplies 14650 Imaging Plus, Inc. 460.76 Office Supplies 14651 Impulse 67.17 Mechanical Supplies 14652 Industrial Steam 220.08 Pump Supplies 14653 Industrial Threaded Products 5,693.41 Connectors 14654 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 261.87 Lab Supplies 14655 IBM Corporation 538.79 After-hours Phone Support-Various AS/400 Problems 14656 IPCO Safety-Ca. 211.55 Safety Supplies 14657 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 520.47 Instrument Supplies 14658 J.L.Wingert Co. 390.69 Electrical Supplies 14659 J.P.Morgan Securities, Inc. 22,451.51 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series 14660 J.P. Nissen Co. 47.77 Office Supplies 14661 Jay's Catering 213.95 Directors Meeting Expense 14662 John Mangiapane 400.00 Repair Service-Trawl Nets 14663 Johnstone Supply 1,402.64 Electrical Supplies 14664 Kelly Paper 403.32 Paper 14665 Knox Industrial Supplies 5,860.15 Tools 14666 Komax Systems, Inc. 623.12 Plumbing Supplies 14667 Lantronix 116.37 Computer Supplies 14668 League Of California Cities 500.00 Conference Registration 14669 Lexis-Nexis 373.41 Subscription 1119/98 1:50 PM BA Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xis Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 10/1198 -10/16/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14670 LA Cellular Telephone Company 32.31 Cellular Telephone Service 14671 M.E. Silbermann Co. 24,197.70 Sewer Repair 14672 Mamco International 139.00 Janitorial Supplies 14673 Mar Vac Electronics 76.50 Instrument Supplies 14674 Margate Construction 7,000.00 Construction Pl-36-2 14675 Mc Junket Corp 3,880.65 Plumbing Supplies 14676 McKenna Engineering&Equipment 1,794.08 Pump Supplies 14677 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,685.74 Tools 14678 McWelco Rack-N-Box Co. 574.85 Auto Parts&Supplies 14679 Micro Flex 3D4.00 Gloves 14680 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 13,537.73 Mechanical Repairs 14681 Mission Uniform Service 1,735.27 Uniform Rentals 14682 Motion Industries 73.38 Pump Supplies 14683 MotoPhoto 18.19 Photographic Services 14684 MGDTechnclogies, Inc. 4,660.00 Maintenance Agreement 14685 MPS Photographic Services 36.10 Water System Maint.Agreement 14686 MSA C/O Mag Systems 273.40 Electrical Supplies 14687 Mine Safety Appliances Company 4,981.02 Safety Supplies 14688 National Civic League 325.00 Meeting Registration 14689 National Plant Services, Inc. 5,900.00 Vacuum Truck Services - - 14690 Neal Supply Co. 452.55 Plumbing Supplies 14691 Newark Electronics 147.96 Instrument Supplies 14692 Nextel Communications 476.47 Cellular Phones&Air Time 14693 Nidrey Petroleum Co. Inc. 1,766.46 LubricantlDiesel Fuel 14694 NAS Associates,Inc. 483.00 Service Agreement-1998 Regional Monitoring Program 14695 Office Depot Business Services 905.71 Office Supplies 14696 Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 768.00 Temporary Employment Services 14697 Oracle Education 1,515.00 Training Registration 14698 Orange County EMA 808.50 Permit Fees 14699 Orange County Farts Supply 123.91 Chemicals 14700 Orange County Wholesale Electric 438.86 Instrument Supplies 14701 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 534.96 Fittings 14702 Oxygen Service Company 1,919.64 Specialty Gases 14703 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 970.10 Electrical Supplies 14704 Pacific Bell 35.76 Telephone Services 14705 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,703.86 Plumbing Supplies 14706 Padre Janitorial Supplies 538.16 Janitorial Supplies 14707 Pagenet 1,730.91 Rental Equipment 1119/98 1:50 PM BA Page 6 of 9 CWlmu Paid Ropoit 10 15-ua')*a t I% Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 10/1198 -10115198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14708 Pads Unlimited 259.84 Truck Supplies 14709 Peerless Wiping Materials Co. 721.93 Janitorial Supplies 14710 Polydyne, Inc. 11,557.87 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 14711 Pod Supply 203.00 Rope 14712 Power Design 3,839.70 Electrical Repairs 14713 Power Systems Services, Inc. 3,600.00 Service Agreement-Blowers 4& 5 Testing 14714 Prosum Information Technologies 1,200.00 Consulting Service- Intranet FrontPage'98 14715 R B R Instrumentation, Inc. 164.37 Electrical Supplies 14716 Realtime Systems Corporation 2,500.00 Integration& Support Services 14717 Remedy 6,283.93 Temporary Employment Services 14718 Reynolds& Reynolds Company 2,927.38 Printing Service-Wastehauler Manifest Form 14719 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 125.00 Auto Repair 14720 Rosen's Electrical Equipment 646.50 Electrical Supplies 14721 Royce Productions 10,503.10 Video Production Service- 10 Minute Orientation Video 14722 RPM Electric Motors 2,397.44 Electric Motor Supplies 14723 Scantech, Inc 6,013.45 Sewer System Atlas 14724 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,486.37 Specialty Gases 14725 Sears 40.53 Mechanical Supplies 14726 Shurduck Sales&Engineering 322.80 ToolslHardware 14727 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 436.39 Lab Supplies 14728 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. 273.45 Plumbing Supplies 14729 Snap-On Incorporated 69.91 Tools 14730 So.Cal. Gas Company 2,123.07 Natural Gas 14731 South Coast Air Quality Management 2,537.80 Service Agreement-Review of ACEMS Application 14732 Southern California Edison 7.894.62 Power 14733 Southwest Scientific Inc. 4,732.38 Instrument Supplies 14734 Sparling Instruments, Inc. 126.43 Meter 14735 Spex Ceriprep Inc. 1,425.62 Lab Supplies 14738 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 137.00 Janitorial Supplies 14737 State Street Bank and Trust Co. 5,825.88 COP Trustee Services 14738 Summit Steel 2,758.99 Metal 14739 Sunset Ford 120.28 Truck Supplies 14740 Super Chem Corporation 1,209.55 Chemicals 14741 Syscom, Inc. 1.521.68 On-Site Training 14742 SKC-West, Inc. 909.89 Safety Supplies 14743 SMACNA 5.00 Publication 14744 SWRCB Accounting Office 400.00 Annual Fee 14745 Taylor-Dunn 86.04 Electric Cad Pans 1119198 1:50 PM BA Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.x1s Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011198 -10115198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14746 Thermo LabSystems 1,500.00 Training Registration 14747 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,950.67 Mechanical Supplies 14748 Time Warner Communications 80.94 Cable Services 14749 Travel Executives 1.140.00 Travel Services 14760 Tropical Plaza Numery, Inc. 9,003.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 14751 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 288.04 Truck Supplies 14752 TCH Associates, Inc. 512.10 Lab Supplies 14753 Ultra Scientific 66.32 Lab Supplies 14754 Valley Cities Supply Company 3,619.85 Plumbing Supplies 14755 Vertex 1,034.40 Office Furniture 14756 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,497.00 Vision Service Premium 14757 VWR Scientific Products 2,487.74 Lab Supplies 14758 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,083.04 Security Guards 14759 Weather Services International 7.67 Computer Supplies 14760 Wellwater, Inc. 670.00 Permit Fee Refund 14761 Western Health Services 14,920.00 Degreaser 14762 Xerox Corporation 14,613.51 Copier Leases 14763 Voided Check - - 14764 Verve's Plumbing 9,760.00 Plumbing Supplies 14765 Shabbir S.Basrai 221.29 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14766 James E.Colston 182.25 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14767 Robert P.Ghirelli 62.81 Training Expense Reimb. 14768 Harriet Kader 193.53 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14769 Dustin Le 193.53 Training Expense Reimb. 14770 David A. Ludwin 477.28 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14771 Donald F. McIntyre 60.98 Cellular Expense Reimb. 14772 Michael D. Moore 518.80 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14773 Robert Dolan 160.50 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14774 LEIIen Ray 250.00 Cash Advance 14775 Adrian Renescu 221.87 Training Expense Reimb. 14776 Antonio S.Valenzuela 107.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14777 EZ ComputerNoxon Corp. &Victor Salinas 1,928.92 Computer Loan 14778 Orange County Sanitation District 16,809.65 Workers Comp. Reimb. 14779 Orange County Sanitation District 1,002.53 Petty Cash Reimb. 14780 Orange County Sanitation District 137.85 Petty Cash Reimb. 14781 Rita Riccardo 174.71 Training Expense Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $2,799,806.09 11/9/98 1:50 PM BA Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-964ds c5� a Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 1011198 -10116198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 11094-11241 Employee Paychecks $ 189,017.73 Biweekly Payroll I V7198 11242 Employee Paycheck 10,973.50 Termination 11243-11265 Directors'Paychecks 5.122.81 Payroll 10/14/98 31000-31441 Direct Deposit Payments 616,891.40 Biweekly Payroll 10f7198 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 821.005.44 Wire Transfer Payments Texas Commerce Bank $ 148,842.54 October Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits Texas Commerce Bank 230,837.24 October Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits State Street Bank 8 Trust 204,677.20 October Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 584,356.08 Total Claims Paid 10/1198 -10/16/98 $4,205,168.51 11/9198 1:50 PM BA Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xls Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10116/98 to 10131198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 14782 CSMFO $ 60.00 Seminar Registration 14783 Anchor Paving 27,200.00 Raise Manholes 14784 Carollo Engineers 79,438.83 Engineering Services-P1-38, P2.43, MO 4-14-93 14785 Orange County Sanitation District 398.859.35 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 14786 Science Applications Intl., Co. 152.284.05 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 14787 Southern California Edison 45.538.58 Power 14788 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 33,489.11 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044 14789 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 8,905.33 Engine Testing J-19 14790 Alisa Lynn Gorman 212.50 Wage Garnishment 14791 Almega Environmental&Technical 320.00 Service Agreement- Emissions Source Testing of Combustion Engines 14792 Barclays Law Publishers 99.00 Subscription 14793 Bentley Systems, Inc. 553.38 Software Maintenance Agreement 14794 Beverly May Gilliam 455.15 Wage Garnishment 14795 Boyle Engineering Corporation 7,430.40 Engineering Services 7-23 14796 British American Chamber of Commerce 35.00 Conference Registration 14797 Lori Colamonico 581.00 Wage Garnishment 14798 CorDax/Bentley Systems, Inc. 1,100.00 Registration Fee-Essential MicroStation Course 14799 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment 14800 California Water Awareness Campaign 300.00 Campaign Contribution 14801 CNA Trust 19.217.10 Construction 5-41-1 14802 CWEA 1998 Conference 455.00 Conference Registration 14803 Diane Kilpatrick 611.07 Wage Garnishment 14804 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 99.51 Paint Supplies 14805 DGA Consultants, Inc. 8,192.20 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 14806 Enterprise Technologies 16.754.70 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation 14807 Franchise Tax Board 97.81 Wage Garnishment 14808 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment 14809 Haaker Equipment Company 57.34 Truck Supplies 14810 Holmes&Narver Inc. 1.578.20 Engineering Services 2-41 14811 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 COP Arbitrage Rebate 14812 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,774A4 Dues Deduction 14813 J&W Scientific 300.00 Lab Supplies 14814 Moreland&Associates 11,243.50 Auditing Services MO 3-8-96 14815 National Seminars Group 395.00 Seminar Registration 14816 New Horizons Computer Learning 349.00 Software Training Classes 14817 The Norco Companies 111.80 Mail Delivery Service 14818 Optio Software 1,250,00 Software 11/9198 2:09 PM Page 1 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.r1:i •� Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10116198 to 10/31198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14819 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment 14820 Orange County Forum 30.00 Conference Registration 14821 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment 14822 OCEA 573.37 Dues Deduction 14823 Pacific Bell 49.24 Telephone Services 14824 Pamala Garcla 100.00 Wage Gamishment 14825 Patricia Burkholder 296.00 Wage Garnishment 14826 Peace Officers Council of CA 837.00 Dues Deduction 14827 ShowCase Corporation 3.232.50 Software License 14828 So.Cal. Gas Company 17,215.47 Natural Gas 14829 State of Califomia 95.42 Hazardous Waste Tax 14830 SWRCB Accounting Office 10.000.00 Annual Fee 14831 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions 14832 Cad E. Beach 374.03 Training Expense Reimb. 14833 Jeffrey Brown 96.66 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14834 Barbara A. Collins 103.80 Training Expense Reimb. 14835 Rick J. Hannappel 639.00 Training Expense Reimb. 14836 W.Doug Hauser 195.97 Training Expense Reimb. 14837 Warren S.Hawkins 357.46 Training Expense Reimb. 14838 Voided Check - 14839 John Kavoklis 360.85 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14840 Vladimir A. Kogan 408.21 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14841 Beatrice A. Mitchell 193.53 Training Expense Reimb. 14842 Edward M.Torres 432.08 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14843 Marco Polo S.Velasco 422.07 Training Expense Reimb. 14844 Charles F.Winsor 1,212.15 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14845 Computer library 2,164.89 Subscription 14846 Advance Constructors Inc. 209,500.00 Construction J-34-1, P2-35-5 14847 Airpol Construction, Inc. 270.345.08 Construction P1-51R 14948 Bio Gro Division 30,773.89 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 14849 Business Objects Americas 49.034.44 Software-Data Warehouse/Integration Project 14850 Cincinnati Incorporated 94,176.77 Hydraulic Press Brake 14851 Dell Marketing L.P. 48.236.20 10 Dell Latitude Cpi 266XT 8 1 Inspiron D233XT Notebook Computers 14852 Delta Dental 38,892.82 Dental Insurance Plan 14853 James Martin&Co. 111,125.43 Data Integration Project 14854 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25.385.80 Medical Insurance Premium 14855 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 38,447.45 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 14856 Margate Construction, Inc. 48,259.00 Construction Pl-36-2 11/9198 2:09 PM Page 2 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.xis Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10116198 to 10131198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14857 Olsson Construction 33,003.00 Construction P2-39-1 14858 Pacificare of Ca 40.495.97 Health Insurance Premium 14859 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 70,461.05 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 14860 Polydyne, Inc. 28,408.23 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 14861 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 26,034.18 Construction 7-7-1 14862 Tule Ranch/Magan Fans 69,494.26 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 14863 Western States Chemical, Inc. 32,610.06 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 14864 Woodruff, Spradlin& Smart 98.282.72 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 14865 The Vantage Group, Inc. 9,832.00 Professional Services-Source Control Programming 14866 American Telephone&Telegraph 13.23 Long Distance Telephone Services 14867 A-Plus Systems 696.96 Notices&Ads 14868 Abrasive Engineering Tool& Equipment 36.47 Hardware 14869 Accountants Overload 1,224.00 Temporary Employment Services 14870 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 3,647.50 Engine Testing J-19 14871 Aidco Systems, Inc. 3,188.76 Engine Supplies 14872 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 13.20 Lab Supplies 14873 Airborne Express 16.50 Air Freight 14874 Allied Supply Company 11,432.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 14875 American Management Association 139.00 Seminar Registrations/Subscription 14876 American National Standards, Inc. 24.00 Publication 14877 American Sigma, Inc. 863.48 Mechanical Supplies 14878 Anicom, Inc. 407.30 Electrical Parts&Supplies 14879 Anixter, Inc. 41.00 Computer Supplies 14680 Appleone Employment Service 5.513.91 Temporary Employment Services 14881 Applied Industrial Technology 9.893.61 Pump Supplies 14882 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 950.00 Lab Supplies 14883 Asbury Environmental Services 55.00 Waste Oil Removal 14884 Azur Environmental 275.60 Lab Supplies 14885 AKM Consulting Engineers 20.120.00 Engineering Services 11-17.1 MO 6-24-98 14886 Bailey Fischer&Porter Company 382.27 Electrical Supplies 14887 Baker Process 999.92 Mechanical Supplies 14888 Banana Blueprint, Inc. 583.17 Printing MO 11-7-94 14889 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 225.00 Telephone Installation 14890 Battery Specialties 52.11 Batteries 14891 BuyComp 3,555-14 Computer Supplies 14892 Cal-Glass, Inc. 135.23 Lab Supplies 14893 Califomia Environmental Controls 864.77 Electrical Parts&Supplies 14894 California Auto Refrigeration 60.30 Service Agreement 1119/98 2:20 PM Page 3 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.t68 Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16198 to 10131/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14895 Callrol, Inc. 2.016.88 Hardware 14896 Canus Corporation 206.28 Fiber Optic Cable 14897 Carleton Engineers&Consultants 13.75 Engineering Services-Air Quality 14898 Cashes, Inc. 90.39 Valve Supplies 14899 Charles P. Crowley Co. 326.36 Instrument Parts 14900 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 721.48 Professional Services 14901 Coast Rubber Stamp, Mfg. 40.19 Office Supplies 14902 Color Arts, Inc. 1,714.31 Vehicle Decals 14903 Communications Performance Group 18.180.00 Professional Services 14904 Compuserve Incorporated 284.15 Computer Services 14905 Computers America, Inc. 3.840.82 Computer Supplies 14906 Connell GM Parts 41.95 Truck Supplies 14907 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 7,331.07 Electrical Supplies 14908 Consolidated Plastics Company 842.45 Welding Equipment&Supplies 14909 Converse Consultants 382.50 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 14910 Cooper Cameron Corporation 15,455.37 Engine Supplies 14911 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease 14912 Corporate Express 2,508.62 Office Supplies 14913 Cost Containment Solutions 2,128.51 Workers Comp. Services 14914 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 66.45 Truck Pads 14915 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 133.06 Mechanical Supplies 14916 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 4,356.00 Underground Tank Fees 14917 County of Orange 3,915.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 14918 County Wholesale Electric Co. 12.69 Electrical Supplies 14919 Culligan Water Conditioning 30.00 Soft Water Service 14920 CPI: Califomia Pipeline Inspection 1,173.00 Lab Supplies 14921 CR& R Incorporated 315.00 Container Rentals 14922 CWEA 1998 Conference 315.00 Conference Registration 14923 Daily Pilot 150.00 Notices&Ads 14924 Day-Timers, Inc. 27.74 Office Supplies 14925 Decorative Arts 650.00 Refinish Desk 14926 Del Mar Analytical 2,382.00 Biosolids Analysis 14927 DeZudck 14,287.87 Valves 14928 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 466.73 Paint Supplies 14929 Duthie Generator Service, Inc. 6,306.00 Generator Supplies 14930 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 200.00 Medical Screening 14931 Electra Bond, Inc. 1,777.88 Mechanical Supplies 14932 Emergency Management Network 3,000.00 CPR/First Aid Training 1119198 2:09 PM Page 4 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.x1s Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16/98 to 10/31/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14933 Enchanter, Inc. 6.300.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 14934 Enterprise Technologies 5,432.50 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation 14935 Environmental Resources Association 1.238.80 Lab Services 14936 ESP Industries, Inc. 216.36 Mechanical Supplies 14937 Federal Express Corp. 127.15 Air Freight 14938 Filter Supply Company 530.17 Filters 14939 Fisher Scientific 388.64 Lab Supplies 14940 Fluke Electronics Corp. 11,152.24 Electrical Supplies 14941 Fountain Valley Camera 28.04 Photo Supplies 14942 Voided Check - 14943 Voided Check - - 14944 Fry's Electronics 950.64 Computer Supplies 14945 FST Sand and Gravel, Inc. 552.13 Road Base Materials 14946 G.E. Supply Company 461.58 Electric Parts 14947 Ganahl Lumber Company 178.00 Lumber/Hardware 14948 GTE California 8.228.63 Telephone Services 14949 George Yardley Co. 1.193.67 Lab Supplies 14950 Getinge Castle 936.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance 14951 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 2,816.10 Pump Supplies 14952 WIN Grainger Inc. 3,021.90 Compressor Supplies 14953 Graseby STI 2,106.75 Engine Supplies 14954 Grating Pacific, Inc. 2,444-85 Fiberglass Grating 14955 Graybar Electric Company 2,707.88 Electrical Supplies 14956 Great American Printing Co. 1,267.58 Printing Service 14957 G.W. Maintenance 120.00 Pump Maintenance 14958 David P. Halverson 2,475.00 Computer Loan 14959 Hamilton Company 5,791.13 Lab Supplies 14960 Harcourt Brace 75.70 Publication 14961 Harrington Industrial Plastics 1,320.01 Plumbing Supplies 14962 Harvard Business Review 155.00 Subscription 14963 Hatch 8 Kirk, Inc. 2,156.70 Truck Supplies 14964 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 1,609.91 Compressor Parts 14965 Home Depot 436.07 Small Hardware 14966 Hopkins Technical Products 3,320.30 Pump Supplies 14967 Hub Auto Supply 34.88 Truck Parts 14968 loan 167.57 Lab Supplies 14969 Industrial Hearing&Pulmonary 6,590.00 On-Site Audiometric Testing 14970 Industrial Threaded Products 141A8 . Connectors 11/9198 2:09 PM Page 5 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.xia Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10116/98 to 10131198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 14971 Information For Public Affairs 165.00 Online Service 14972 Information Resources 100.00 Personnel Services 14973 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 579.48 Lab Supplies 14974 Inside EPA 1,605.00 Subscription 14975 Interstate Battery Systems 254.07 Batteries 14976 Irvine Ranch Water District 48.10 Water Use 14977 IBM Corporation 667.23 Service Contract 14978 IBM Corporation 6,075.37 Service Contract 14979 IPCO Safety-Ca 667.19 Safety Supplies 14980 ISA 56.00 Publication 14981 J.G. Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,055.58 Instrument Supplies 14982 Jay's Catering 548.01 Director's Meeting Expense 149B3 Jendham, Inc. 338.00 Subscription 14984 Jensen Instruments Co. 3,474.23 Gauge 14985 Jobs Available, Inc. 119,60 Notices&Ads 14986 John Lisee Pumps 3,774.47 Pump Supplies 14987 Johnstone Supply 668.67 Electrical Supplies 14988 JLMC, Inc. 2,558.64 Tour Platform @ Trickling Filters 14989 K.P. Lindstrom 5,157.75 Envir.Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 14990 Kaman Industrial Technologies 39.63 Mechanical Supplies 14991 Kelar Training Centers 395.00 Registration Fees 14992 Kelly Paper 63.42 Paper 14993 Knox Industrial Supplies 2.294.59 Tools 14994 Lab Safety Supply,lnc. 1,794.69 Safety Supplies 14995 Lab Support 2,475.00 Temporary Employment Services 14996 Law/Crandall 456.00 Soil Testing 7-13-94 14997 Leadership Directories, Inc. 36.00 Subscription 14998 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 6,115.00 Architectural Services 14999 Lustre-Cal 964.63 Safety Supplies 15000 M. E. Silbemlann Co. 5,445.65 Sewer Repair 15001 Maintenance Technology Corp. 389.09 Welding Supplies 15002 Masune Company 222.75 Safety Supplies 16003 Mc Junkin Corp. 646.50 Plumbing Supplies 15004 McKenna Engineering& Equipment 652.59 Pump Supplies 15005 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1,214.38 Tools 15006 Melles Griot Optical 849.00 Office Supplies 15007 Mellon Trust 16,083.34 Investment Custodian Bank 15008 Mesa Muffler 348.00 Truck Supplies 1119198 2:09 PM Page 6 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98 As Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16/98 to 10131/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15009 Metier, Inc. 9,000.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Data Integration Project 15010 Tri Pole CorplMicroAge 3,260.97 Software 15011 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 6,718.38 Mechanical Repairs 15012 Milltronics, Inc. 457.62 Electrical Supplies 15013 Mission Uniform Service 3.932.25 Uniform Rentals 15014 Mission Abrasive Supplies 154.95 Gloves 15015 Monitor Labs, Inc. 1.699.99 Instruments 15016 Peter M. Morrison 617.05 Training Expense Reimb. 15017 Morton Salt 549.63 Salt 15018 Motion Industries 263.15 Pump Supplies 15019 MotoPhoto 48.86 Photographic Services 15020 MGD Technologies, Inc. 1,000.00 Maintenance Agreement 15021 MPS Photographic Services 44.18 Water System Maint.Agreement 15022 Nat West Markets 1,000.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees 15023 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement 15024 National Plant Services, Inc. 13.419.40 Vacuum Truck Services 15025 National Safety Council 500.00 Safety Film Rentals 15026 National Technology Transfer 3,940.00 Training Registration 15027 Newark Electronics 73.98 Instrument Supplies 15028 Nickey Petroleum Co. Inc. 8,203.82 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel 15029 Nico Mak Computing 770.00 Software 15030 NWRI Microfiltration II 195.00 Registration Fees 15031 Office Depot Business Services 2,223.95 Once Supplies 15032 Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 3.290.00 Temporary Employment Services 15033 Robert Dolan 303.23 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15034 Operation Technology, Inc. 994.75 Computer Software 15035 Oracle Corporation 3,857.45 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement 15036 Oxygen Service Company 1,836.91 Specialty Gases 15037 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 144.82 Electrical Supplies 15038 Pacific Bell 2,328.68 Telephone Services 15039 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,367.08 Plumbing Supplies 15040 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 11,204.65 Instrument Supplies 1 SG41 Padre Janitorial Supplies 241.60 Janitorial Supplies 15042 Pagenet 1,737.76 Pager Services 15043 Parts Unlimited 161.35 Truck Supplies 15044 Pinnacle One 540.00 Registration Fees 15045 Precision Backhoe 985.00 Equipment Rental 15046 Progressive Business Publication 230.00 - Subscription 1119198 2:09 PM Page 7 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98..s Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10116198 to 10/31/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15047 Prosum Information Technologies 150.00 Consulting Service-Intranet Frontpage'98 15048 PCS Express 105.00 Courier Service 15049 0 Air•Calif. Div. Pump Engineer 786.00 Pump Supplies 15050 R&R Instrumentallon, Inc. 62.12 Electrical Supplies 15051 R.L.Abbott&Associates 8.000.00 Kern County Blosolids Consulting Services 15052 Ray Ashworth, C.P.A. 10.00 Refund of Overpayment for Plans&Secificalions 15053 Reliaslar 23,612.66 Life Insurance Premium 15054 Reliastar Bankers Security Life 13.291.38 Life Insurance Premium 15055 Remedy 4,411.70 Temporary Employment Services 15056 Adriana Renescu 1,247.69 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15057 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 110.00 Auto Repair 15058 RM Controls 38.91 Instrument Supplies 15059 RS Hughes Co., Inc. 516.17 Paint Supplies 15060 Safety-Kleen 60.00 Service Agreement 15061 Sea Coast Designs, Inc. 39.00 Lab Supplies 15002 City of Seal Beach 178.96 Water Use 15063 Second-Sun 1.096.85 Light Fixtures 15064 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 416.74 Tools 15065 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 4,421.34 Tools/Hardware 15066 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 8,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 15067 Sievers 920.50 Lab Supplies 15068 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 168.04 Lab Supplies 15069 Skyline Displays of Orange County 96.98 Halogen Light Set 15070 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 865.91 Plumbing Supplies 15071 Snap-On Incorporated 36.65 Tools 15072 Southern California Trans Service 10,880.00 Electrical Supplies 15073 Sparkletts 2,131.68 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 15074 Specialized Products 1.826.24 Network Test Equipment 15075 Sprint 43.05 Long Distance Telephone Service 15078 Standard and Poors Corp. 2,500.00 COP Contract Service 15077 State Board Of Equalization 208.61 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 15078 State Chemical Mfg. Co. 896.40 Janitorial Supplies 15079 Summit Steel 4,585.31 Metal 15080 Sunrise Environmental Scientific 200.83 Auto Supplies 15081 Sunset Ford 283.38 Truck Supplies 15082 Super Chem Corporation 670.80 Chemicals 15063 Super Ice Corporation 127.27 Lab Supplies 15084 Super Power Products 371.74 Janitorial Supplies 1119198 2:09 PM Page 8 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.xls Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10/16198 to 10131/98 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 15085 Systems Integrated 19,800.00 Construction Services-J-31-3 16086 SARBS-CWEA 30,00 Annual Meeting 15087 SHRM 160.00 Annual Membership Renewal 15088 Teledyne Eletronic Tech. 164.45 Instrument Parts 15089 Foxboro Company 853.38 Instrument Supplies 15090 The Register 1,832.60 Notices&Ads 15091 Tomell &Cotten 1.278.50 Legal Services 15092 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 103.07 Truck Supplies 15093 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 352.00 Lab Services 15094 Unocal 76 13.34 Permit Fee Refund 15095 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,150.54 Plumbing Supplies 15096 Veme's Plumbing 636.80 Plumbing Supplies 15097 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 18,793.41 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044 15098 VWR Scientific Products 582.95 Lab Supplies 15099 The Wackenhut Corporation 3,041.52 Security Guards 15100 Water Environment Federation 260.00 Professional Development Courses 15101 Waxis Sanitary Supply 680.66 Janitorial Supplies 15102 Western Metro Unit 599.74 Filters 15103 Moyasar T.Yahya 754.05 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15104 Yokogawa Ind.Automation 129.11 Instrument Supplies 15105 3T Equipment Company 168.49 PSI Wire Reinforced Hose 15106 Juan J.Ambriz 253.96 Training Expense Reimb. 15107 Nicholas J.Amontes 293.27 Training Expense Reimb. 15108 Mark Castillo 1,441.16 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15109 Chloe D. Dee 329.34 Meeting Expense Relmb. 15110 Kevin L. Hadden 1,468.36 Training Expense Reimb. 15111 Donald F. McIntyre 1,705.07 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15112 Kathleen T. Millea 504.71 Training Expense Reimb. 15113 Michael D. Moore 1,336.51 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15114 Robert Ooten 1,380.21 Meeting Expense Reimb. 15115 Voided Check - - 15116 Robed C.Thompson 901.49 Meeting Expense Relmb. 15117 Michelle Tuchman 46.05 Cellular Expense Reimb. 15118 State Board of Equalization 250.00 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 15119 Orange County Sanitation District 892.45 Petty Cash Reimb. 15120 LA Cellular Telephone Company 75.47 Cellular Telephone Service 15121 State Board of Equalization 250.00 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 15122 County of Orange 3,915.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 11/9/98 2:23 PM Page 9 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10.31.98.xh Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 10116198 to 10131198 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,786,625.72 Payroll Disbursements 11266-11411 Employee Paychecks $ 189,458A8 Biweekly Payroll 10121/98 11412.11426 Employee Paycheck 2,343.79 Shift Differential Adjustments 11427 Employee Paycheck 241.78 Accrual Payout 31500-31941 Direct Deposit Statements 629.372,91 Biweekly Payroll 10121/98 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 821,416.96 Wire Transfer Payments None Total Claims Paid 10116198-10131198 $ 3,608,042.68 11/9198 2.09 PM Page 10 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.x1s DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, October 28, 1998 at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, October 28, 1998 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Board (part-time) Shawn Boyd, Seal Beach Alternate Director Peer Swan, Vice Chair of the Board Norm Eckenrode, Director Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Charles Egigian-Nichols, Consultant Jan Debay, Chair, PDC Committee Ryal Wheeler, OCSO Employee George Brown, Chair, FAHR Committee John Collins, Past Chairman of the Boards STAFF PRESENT: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Directors Absent: Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Bill Steiner, County Supervisor Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Bob Ghirelli, Director of Tech. Services Ed Hodges, Director of GSA David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Mike Petennan, Director of Human Resources Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Jim Herberg, Planning Manager Mike Moore, ECM Manager (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Vice Chair Peer Swan was appointed Chair pro tem in the absence of Chair Dunlap, who arrived at 6 p.m. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) 'RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting of September 23, 1998 were approved as drafted. OCSD • PO Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127 . (714) %2-2411 i Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 2 October 28, 1998 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR There was no report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre asked to add an item to the Closed Session agenda, and General Counsel also asked that the pending Walcon litigation be added to the Closed Session agenda. It was moved, seconded and passed that the measures were of an urgent nature, and that they be added to the Closed Session agenda for discussion. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (8) STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Early Retirement Opportunity The General Manager updated the Committee on the results of this program to date, and recommended that it again be presented to the Board in January for the effective period of January through May 1999. Action: This item will be added to the December Steering Committee agenda with a detailed report for additional discussion. C. Ranking Procedures for FY 99-00 Capital Improvement Projects David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, reported that a team has been farmed to develop a methodology to screen new projects and prioritize them for the next CIP budget in an effort to streamline and standardize the process. Subjectivity should not be eliminated from the process. Action: Staff was directed to bring a 'project' back to the Steering Committee that has been run through the criteria. D. Orange County Millenium Book Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, reported on an outreach opportunity through the County of Orange's Millenium Book. The Steering Committee directed staff to purchase a single page at the rate of$3,000. E. Agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation re Operation of the Compressed Natural Gas Station Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, discussed this project, which will be dedicated this Friday, October 30. An agreement for accessing computer usage data and the user-billing function is required. Signage and marketing activities also have to be worked out. Any signage will require City of Fountain Valley approval. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 3 October 28, 1998 Action: The agenda item drafted for the Steering Committee will be revised to include information on other firms, besides Pickens Fuel Corp., that can also perform these functions and submitted to the OMTS Committee in November for action. F. Directors Workshop on Personnel Issues Don McIntyre asked the Steering Committee members to consider scheduling a Directors workshop in an effort to effect the culture changes needed to educate the full Board on the compensation issues involved in re-engineering the District—where we came from, where we are, and where we are heading—and resulting in a clear direction on how to achieve our goals. Action: The Steering Committee scheduled a special meeting on Wednesday, November 18, at 3 p.m. to discuss this one issue in Closed Session. If consensus is reached, a Directors Workshop on the issue will be held on Saturday, November 21. The regular 8 p.m, Steering Committee meeting will not be held to allow sufficient time to discuss this major issue. B. Kern County Proposed Biosolids Ordinance Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, updated the members on the Kern County biosolids issue as well as the three alternatives available to the District. The draft MOU was discussed. Blake will be providing a brief update to all of the Directors at the Board meeting. Action: The Steering Committee passed a motion to support the numbers in the draft MOU. A related item that staff was previously asked to consider—the possibility of purchasing land for a composting site—was also discussed. Biosolids consultant, Charles Egigian-Nichols, described an available parcel in Kem County that could be converted to a composting site, and outlined some of the other issues required to operate a composting operation. Action: The OMITS Committee shall consider forming a subcommittee at its next meeting to discuss this idea in more detail before taking any further action. G. The list of action items scheduled for consideration by the working committees in November was reviewed. The FAHR Committee will not be meeting in November. 1. Proposed Addendum 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM re Strategic Plan, Phase 2. Treatment. Reuse and Disposal Facilities, Job No. J-40.3. Dave Ludwin reported that most of the work included in this addendum has already been completed because it was additional effort on contract items, not new work. He recognized and apologized for the lapse in program management and has developed safeguards to prevent this from happening again. The addendum and the new safeguards will be discussed in detail at the November PDC Committee meeting. (9) OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were no other business, communications, or supplemental agenda items. Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting Page 4 October 28, 1998 (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 18, 1998 at 3 P.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. The Committee voted to forward the agendized items directly to the Closed Session in tonight's Board meeting. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:31 p.m. Submitted by: J n Tappan S16aring Committee Secretary NWp EY�*WMERM'E CWMII1EflOBIO MMOW SC Minube.Ea 4 r pd DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1998 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on November 4, 1998, in the District's Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Toby Weissert, Corollo Engineers James Ferryman, Vice Chair Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Staff Present: Don Bankhead John Collins, Past Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Anna Piercy Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Charles E. Sylvia Ed Hodges, Director General Services Admin. Gary Streed, Director Finance Directors Absent: Bob Ooten, Director Operations and Maintenance Patrick Miles, Director Information Technology Bumie Dunlap, Board Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director Technical Services Steve Anderson Michelle Tuchman, Director Communications Margie L. Rice Frankie Woodside, Committee Secretary Ed Torres, Air Quality &Special Projects Manager Mike Moore, ECM Manager Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialists Jerry Jones, O&M Maintenance Manager APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Ocso 0 P.o.ik.8127 • Fo Uin Vanes,cn 9272"127 0 (714)962-2411 Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 November 4, 1998 RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES The minutes of the October 14, 1998 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR (McGuigan) Chair McGuigan congratulated Ed Hodges on the successful opening dedication ceremonies held on Friday, October 30, 1998, for the CNG station. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER (McIntyre) Peer Swan and myself are meeting with Bill Lane of Crow Winthrop, on Friday, November 6, 1998, to discuss the possibility of avoiding a potential lawsuit. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (Anderson) Update on item MTS98-032 Kern County Biosolids Ordinance and Road Mitigation Fee Agreement: Kern County Board of Supervisors have deferred all of the fees related to biosolids truck inspection fees and road mitigation fees for later consideration when they take up the issue of the final version of their Biosolids Ordinance. This will be occurring sometime in the first quarter of 1999. They've also referred the entire issue of biosolids to their technical advisory committee (known as the Biosolids Ordinance Advisory Committee) to take into consideration the various regulatory issues surrounding the Ordinance as well as the issue of the fees. Existing biosolids application sites will continue to be regulated under the terms of the interim ordinance in the meantime. Our largest contractor in Kern County, Pima Gro, elected to not apply for permits for any of its existing biosolids application sites and, as a result, they are no longer hauling any biosolids to Kern County. They are now hauling instead to Riverside and San Diego Counties for the same dollar per ton charge to us. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (Hodges) The Director of General Services Administration did not make a report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Miles) Update on item OMTS98-030 Year 2000 Date Change Compliance Report: Staff is still working diligently on this project. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (Ooten) The Director of Operations and Maintenance did not make a report. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 November 4, 1998 O&M Monthly Report Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report: The previous month's report was submitted to the OMTS Committee for review. This report focuses on compliance, safety, financial data and performance measures for O& M and is intended to provide Committee members with information on a timely basis. Also included in this report is the DART Implementation Status Report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES (Ghirelll) Technical Services submitted an application to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)for$500,000, to conduct a Dairy Washwater Sewering Project. This application is part of a larger watershed package submitted by the Santa Ana River Watershed Group, Technical Services has just learned that the State Board has tentatively approved funding for the sewering project. Technical Services has received and will respond to a survey from the SWRCB asking us to tell them what our plans are concerning the Y2K program. OCWD has offered us a couple of seats on a tour they're conducting of their Wetlands Project at Prado Dam on Friday, November 20, 1998, from 8:30 a.m. to noon. If anyone would like to attend please let me know. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. DISCUSSION ITEM(S) 1. OMTS98-034 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY FUELING AGREEMENT Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to authorize the General Manger to enter into an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley to allow the City to use our diesel and unleaded fueling station at Plant 1. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 November 4, 1998 2. OMTS98-035 AGREEMENT WITH PICKENS FUEL CORPORATION FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CNG REFUELING STATION Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation for the Operation and Maintenance of the CNG Refueling Station. 3. OMTS98-036 COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM GUIDANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE UPDATE Motion: Information only. 4. OMTS98-037 1998-99 OPERATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM AND STATUS Motion: Information only. 5. OMTS98-038 AGREEMENT FOR OPTION TO PURCHASE 640-ACRE SITE FOR BIOSOLIDS COMPOSTING Motion: 1. Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend to the Board to authorize the General Manager to enter into an exclusive agreement with Global Security Complex for an option to purchase a 640-acre site in Kern County, for an amount not to exceed $62,400, in a form approved by the General Counsel. 2. Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend to the Board to authorize the General Manager to initiate and conduct due diligence research of said 640-acre site for use as a biosolids composing facility and for composting of other related feedstock including manure, green waste, food wastes and other agriculture residues, in an amount not to exceed $100,000. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 November4, 1998 MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for December 2, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Director McGuigan will not be able to attend this meeting and has asked that Director Ferryman chair this meeting in her absence. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Submitted by: Jl VLlll� At 'cc(\�lA C Franlde Woodside Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary H-..\wp dtalagenda\OMr$t1998\MinutesU I 98 Minutes d. OMTS COMMITTEE MeebngDate To�e/tS 11/04/98 i//idlyd AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Nunite 911-034 Orange County Sanitation District J FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration l W SUBJECT: CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY FUELING AGREEMENT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley to allow the City to use our diesel and unleaded fueling station at Plant 1. SUMMARY The City of Fountain Valley is in the process of relocating their City maintenance yard and has asked if they could use our gasoline and diesel fueling facility at Plant 1 until their yard is complete. They anticipate that they will need to use our facility from December 1, 1998 to June 1999 upon the completion of their maintenance yard. Staff is working with General Counsel in developing a fueling agreement with the City that will result in the District recovering the cost of fuel and any program administration costs (is: cost to bill the City, wear and tear on the facility, etc.). It is anticipated that the contract will include the cost of fuel, plus 15% to cover the administrative costs. During the term of the agreement,the City will have access to our facility and fuel island on a 24-hour per day basis. Staff will issue card keys that will allow the City police staff to have access to our plant during off shift times. Staff will also issue a Personal Identification Number (PIN)that the City staff can use to access the fuel pumps. The PIN will allow us to capture the actual amount of fuel used in each of the City vehicles and will allow us to prepare our billing report to the City. Diesel and unleaded gasoline usage is paid for out of the District's Joint Operating budget, under a blanket purchase order. Fuel is ordered when the tanks are low. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will present a verbal report on this item. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This project will pay for itself and as a result is budget neutral. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section , page ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) H\WP dialgeaW1MOdgeMOMTS1Nov Agenda RaMd OATS.F Poemp Nreemem Ga Paget Since Staff budgeted $140,000 under the Miscellaneous Chemicals, Gasoline, Diesel and Oil portion in this year's fiscal JO budget. Since the City of Fountain Valley will reimburse the District for the use of any gasoline and diesel fuel, the expenditure of these funds should have a minimal effect on the budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Staff is working with General Counsel to prepare an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley. ALTERNATIVES 1. Not to proceed with the Agreement with the City of Fountain Valley. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS EEH: fw H My m�WMlOIa]W`OMfSVb+Igwffi PeOa OMrS.N Fui9 Mw^M.Eac PBrp 2 OMTS MmUng Date ToJtem. 11/04/98 /r/d' J' AGENDA REPORT Item NUM M Item Number 98-035 „ "d I Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration zr>� SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH PICKENS FUEL CORP FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CNG REFUELING STATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation for the Operation and Maintenance of the CNG Refueling Station. SUMMARY The District's CNG Refueling Station is due to become operational in November 1998. Staff believes that it would be to the best interest of the District to outsource the Operation and Maintenance of the station. Additionally, staff believes that Pickens Fuel Corp. is best suited to take over the operation and maintenance function. Pickens Fuel Corp. is a California corporation that owns or manages more than 40 CNG stations in California and the greater Phoenix, Arizona area. They are the largest natural gas fuel suppliers in the United States, with sales of more than 5 million gallons annually. They process more than 3,000 transactions each day and bill more than 1,000 customers each month. Some of their fleet customers include the United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service, SunLine Transit, SuperShuttle, Waste Management, City of Irvine and the US Marine Corp. Under the terms of the agreement, Pickens Fuel Corp. will conduct all scheduled maintenance as required on the compressor skid/controls, gas dryer, two fuel dispensers and 2 card readers. The estimated monthly cost for weekly service to these pieces of equipment is $900 per month, plus parts. Staff assumed that this work would be outsourced when they prepared the original Performs analysis and included a fee of$20,000 in year 1 and $18,000 in subsequent years to cover this cost. The monies to pay for this work would come from the sale of CNG to public and private fleets. Additionally, Pickens will also operate the station for the District. Under the terms of this portion of the agreement, Pickens would provide all of the training, issue credit applications and fuel cards, take care of all billing and market the station to both public and private sector fleets. The cost to provide these services will be $0.10 per gallon for all sales at the District station. Attached for your guidance and review is the Performs analysis showing the cost impact of entering into an agreement with Pickens. Please note that the CNG station still has a positive cash flow, which will only increase, with the increase in marketing effort by Pickens Fuel Corp. In October, staff brought the concept of entering into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corp to the Steering Committee for their information. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will report on the outcome of the meeting with the Steering Committee and be prepared to present a verbal report on this item. HbPNe`yFF IM.V FNLT-FUEIIPICMNMW ,PpFMFReµv10MT5-PFC.E Page t PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The CNG refueling station is designed to pay for itself. The cost to operate and maintain the station will come from the proceeds of selling CNG to public and private Fleets. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section , page ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Staff is working with General Counsel to prepare an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corp. ALTERNATIVES 1. Not to enter into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corp. 2. Not to enter into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corp and to market the use of the station using District staff to other governmental agencies and the public. 3. Do not provide allow the sale of CNG to the public. 4. Prepare a RFP for the outsourcing of the Operation and Maintenance of the facility. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Performa Analysis on the CNG Refueling Station showing the addition of outsourcing the Operation and Maintenance. EEH: fw HWy.�10 dI WTiMLWICI N"w�N WTa-PFL.Ez Paget Perlmms AMlyels 010 Loatla N V-10 LO kDA 1012]I988:10 '- CSDOC NG STATION INCOME STATEMENT Year Yeer2 Year Year4 YWWS Yesr5 YearT Yeare Year9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Yeer13 Yasr14 YBer15 Annual Loatl gB gall4ney6-HAULERS 140.40 140A0 140.40 140.40 2]A.60 22/.84 994.04 224.84 T24.04 280.80 2%.00 280.60 230.80 MAD 280.80 Armual Load(M gallon")-OCSO ____ 5.90 620 6.50 8.83 )d]_ T.53 7.91 SW 8.90 030 8.30 8.30- 8.30 Annual I.Hd(M ga0ur W)-CITIES _ _ 50.00 52.50 SSd9 5].BB 6788 5].88 5]AS 5788 fi].BB 57.% 57.BB 57.88 57 88 57.88 Annual LOetl(bt Hons"-OTHER 5.00 526 5.51 5.79 8.08 0.38 0.70 ).MO 7.99 ].]B 8.14 8,55 _TOTAL ANNUAL LOAD WAS 190A0 198.80 20S.T2 29T28 2%.00 296.48 29GA3 2%.81 353.60 354.02 354.37 354.74 355.13 355.53 Station Recoery-HAULERS(E1.048/gap 191.O9 191.93 199.A 20).]9 2%.l2_ 2%.91 298.81 297.58 28BR6 355.92 30 5 35841 358.48 356.07 357.20 Sta0on Reawary-OCSDDI .0491gaq -- 6.19 am 0.02 7.16 7.52 7.90 829 0.71 8]1 8]t 5.71 8.71 8.71 Stadcn Recovery-CRIES($1.0421gal)__ __ _ 5025 52]fi 0.40 U-10 M 16 58.16 50.16 HIS 58.16_ 58.16 68.15 58.18 58.18 Station Recoery_-OTHER($10191ga$___. ___ 5.W 528 5.54 5.82 6.11 6A1 B.T4 7.W - 7.42 759- 8.18 8.59 TOTAL STATON RECOVERY _ 141.09 241.58 250.72 2]4.% 365.98 38).10 %8.43 389.T5 3)146 429.52 d29.)0 430.40 431.16 431.93 432]4 _. - - StadonE4penaea:_ (Et,%01 . . ..._ COmmotllry )E023Me1m) _ _ _ 3229 42.)9 13A3 K36 18.71 I&n 18.86 18.92 19.00 8125 21.42 21.81 81AS BL68 - 21.]) 7.55 Taxes(kaulerarel ( (e0rers-$.1 t])_. ____._,_. ___ 5.80_12.45 _ 13.95 14.%._ 18.➢1 11.T] 11.85 1IM 11.00 14.15 1410 14.01 14.19 14.21 91.% so Inheart DemanE ($0.04Rs($0. _ _ _ 5_92 7.62._._. ].89 6.27 11.48 11]9 26.59 HAS 1L8) 14A5 1d.18 14.1] 31.93 31.96 143E $c CalTmo pmolnien COek($o.09Menn) ._ _ - 9.83 . 1).14 1].89 1&fi0 26A8_28.00 18.00 ism 28.00 31.00 31.% 31.09 91.83 18.00 _92.00 Fi4ml luers Fue MairMnance 20.00 18." 19.89 1s.% 20.13 20A9 29.55 18.90 29.00 10Ao 36A0 18.00 18.% MAD 35AS Pkkena Fuel Corp operation($O.f0lgalbn) 19.00 12.21 12.83 2&8] 18.1 18.0 29.59 29.61 26.08 36.3] 26AM 22.72 22A7 2E.61 JSSS POWrarux, 9_00 1221 10.00 19R5 1a.( 10.% 16.8a 1&BB 10.00 22.BT 20.00 22.0E 22J4 22.]8 M.72 kaursnce _ _ _ __ _ 0.00 0.00- o.00 0.00- e.MM D.% a.MM D.aD o.DM o.%- a.eM 0.00-o.DD D.oe o.% . _ TOTAL F_kPENSEB 97.37 130.29 135.62 140.70 1%.94 191.21 191.71 192.1E 192.50 226.09 225.91 Y25.53 225A 228.0E 22B.2B 20 NET INCOME (E1,000) 4371 2J10 1 111.34 1 . 3J.95 175.05 175.% 176.72 1T].63 1]8.5) &B3 20429 204s) 205A8 205.91 308.4] HAULING COST SAVINGS ($l,%0) _ Sd.% 54.00 54.08 U.% _ 80463 86.53 86.53 %.53 0.53 108.16 108.16 108.10 1%.16 108.16 10848 CUMMULAWENETINCOME (51,%0) W]9 283.21 "029 028442 589.99 1152.30 1416.89 16)9]9 1844.90 22%.B9 2569.54 2882.5) 31%11 3510.18 J824.80 CASHFLOWSTATEMENT_- - -- -- -- --'_-- -- NET INCOME (31,000) ___ g].)9 289.21 94D.39 62&42 889.89 1152.39 1tl8.84 18T9.]9 1%4.% 2258.89 95BB.56 2882.5] 31%.11 3510.10 382480 Cask Flew 97.79 263.21 d4029 SM442 889.99 1152.39 141SAPI 1679.79 1944.% MNAS 2%&54 2882.517 31911.11 3510.10 384MAD Payback A%lysla@E12m -11%29 4190 T 4113.0 426A6 -38d:09 -101.0 .161.58 40.71 e9D02 : 1002.011 1616ABI IUBAQ1 IW21131 2200.10 2.11 inlet401ced y,4d yaAveek,WgaW6 52 vek".,.aef IAA DOE lecler tar years 14,16 katls tar"am&a aM --- 20 Wall;W years 10-1 B. oche 2-kauMn coat saNrge$1A aflOW _ age OMTS COMMITTEE MeeengDate To ad.ofDlr. 11/4/98 1 11/18/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Number I Item Nu ber ie lei Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Originator: Michael D. Moore, Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Manager SUBJECT: Agreement for Option to Purchase 640-Acre Site for Biosolids Composting GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into an exclusive agreement with Global Security Complex, for the option to purchase their 640-acre site in Kern County for an amount not to exceed $62,400 in a form approved by the General Counsel. 2. Authorize the General Manager to initiate and conduct due diligence research of this site for the use as a biosolids composting facility and for composting of other related feedstocks including manure, green waste, food wastes, and other agricultural residues in an amount not to exceed $100.000. SUMMARY Recent events in Kern County, California, with respect to a County ordinance governing the land application of biosolids have resulted in significant concern by the District's staff over the stability of its program for land application of Class B biosolids. Although a Cost-Sharing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between OCSD and Kern County appears imminent, there continue to be several unsettling issues with respect to Class B biosolids land application in Kern County. Consideration of the draft ordinance by the Kern County Biosolids Ordinance Advisory Committee (BOAC) will commence on October 28, 1998. This committee was recently expanded to include the vocal-farming opponents to Class B biosolids land application. Recommendations from the BOAC are anticipated after the first of the year. Recent meetings with certain farming interests in Kern County indicate a willingness to reach consensus on how best to have biosolids and Kern County agriculture coexist. Not-withstanding these positive steps, the Directors advised OCSD staff to commence assessing other biosolids management alternatives including buying land. Utilizing existing staff and consulting resources, we have identified what appears to be an exceptional land purchase opportunity. In southwestern Kern County a 640-acre, one square mile, parcel is available on the market at an asking price of just less than $2,000,000. For the land alone this price equals $3,108 per acre. The isolated site includes numerous infrastructure improvements (partial list below) valued at more than $12,000,000 installed. The prior owner was the Rockwell Corporation who used the property for microwave testing and B-2 bomber development. The site was evaluated for environmental hazards by the Radon Corporation prior to the sale to the present H%'ryd g.MMlBg6 Mm�,d Age nd.Fepx %lII$44ee IN*)A4 Rw. � Page 1 owner and was allegedly Geared of any hazardous contamination. The site key features include: ♦ Two airport runways, one at 3,200' x 200' and one at 2,800' x 60' ♦ Two helicopter landing pads with total area of 6,300 square feet ♦ 2.1 miles of asphalt roadway plus excellent local road access ♦ Fully chain link fenced ♦ Electrical power single and triple phase 110, 220, and 440 volt ♦ Three buildings with floor space in excess of 21,000 square feet all served by existing water and sewer utilities. The largest building is an administrationlclassroom facility with over 12,000 square feet in 3-stories. A 6,400 square foot hangar building fully insulated and air-conditioned. A 2,500 square foot control tower equivalent to a six-story building including office and bathroom space. • Deep potable water well with operating pump, 12,000 gallon storage tank and installed fire fighting distribution system charged by 12" main pipelines ending in 4" pipelines at hydrant locations. ♦ Developed portions of the facility consume about 140-acres leaving about 500 acres for other uses such as composting. ♦ The site was graded to an average slope of 4%, ideal for storm water drainage control. Because of past activities on the site, there are no conflicts with endangered or threatened species. ♦ The site has existing County Conditional Use Permits (CUP) allowing operation of the airport, related industrial uses, mobile home park, law enforcement training, civilian target shooting, and paint ball recreation. A new CUP would be needed to launch compost operations. A fast-track CUP based on a mitigated negative declaration could be obtained in 90-days. If an environmental impact report were required the permitting process could be achieved within 180 to 210 days. These timeframes would accommodate obtaining permits from the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Integrated Waste Management Board. Once obtained, a CUP is held in perpetuity. The composting opportunity on this site is excellent and substantial. Over 400 acres of the site are suitable for windrow composting. Using conservative assumptions regarding process operations and product marketing opportunities, the site has a capacity to take in and process about 1,200,000 tons per year of organic matter. The total annual OCSD production of biosolids is less than 200,000 tons per year and could be fully accommodated by the operation. If operating at rapacity, composting would transform the feedstock into about 720,000 tons per year of various grade compost products. A preliminary pro forma for the facility was developed. Key assumptions in the analysis include that the facility is drawing in green waste, food waste, manure, food processing waste and agricultural residues at current market values for feedstock, transportation and product revenue and efficiently operated by a private firm. Also, in addition to the property purchase price of up to $2 million, we estimate an additional $1.8 million is needed for site improvements and operating equipment. Depending on site soil conditions and their ability to be compacted an additional $1 million may be needed to add a one-foot clay sealant layer to prevent any downward migration of compost constituents. w w.P.aaW mwrveoe�mn ame�w�Rawrs��ttemwn tIXH.m a Page 2 The preliminary pro forma analysis shows that if the facility were operating at or near capacity, it is highly likely the operation would substantially reduce OCSD's overall costs of biosolids management away from the treatment plant while producing a Class A biosolids product. Depending on market conditions, it may be possible for the District to approach break-even on its biosolids. This preliminary pro forma did not include any funds from operation of the airfield, related training and industrial facilities, or from the potential to sell water associated with the property. In addition there is the real possibility to lease portions of the land and infrastructure to entities such as the Forest Service, law enforcement agencies, and small industrial facilities. Due diligence on this site would include, at a minimum, work items such as title search, property appraisal & valuation, site and infrastructure conditions verification including environmental hazards, water rights research. In addition the permit approval processes with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the California Integrated Waste Management Board, and Kern County would have to be addressed and preliminary compost facility engineering developed. It is estimated that this due diligence will cost between $50,000 and $100,000. The schedule to bring on-line this facility could be fast-tracked to occur in 6 to B months. If feedstocks were brought to the site beginning mid-1999, the first compost products would be ready for sale and distribution about 120 days later. If the ramp up period for new feedstock is relatively short, 3 to 6 months, it is probable that the District's payback will occur within 15-months of start-up. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY To secure the exclusive rights to the option to purchase this property and conduct our needed due diligence, the property owner is willing to entertain an offer from the OCSD for an option to purchase the parcel contingent upon all necessary research and other appropriate conditions. The landowner requests the option be established at $10,400 per month, which covers current mortgage, operating expenses, and, property taxes. Based on our current understanding of research and development requirements for this property, we estimate the purchase option may need to extend for up to 6-months for a total of$62,400. All of the purchase option funds would credit against the property purchase. It is estimated that this due diligence will cost between $50,000 and $100,000. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HMy.C9bpaMvll�Jurit RmNFgenEv Repvb\1110BTXsn 1qe)M Page 3 p I'' ALTERNATIVES \ CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS H My Cs�peMe\1pd8 Jtirf.&ury AooM.FepahI1116BTMn 1de14✓ "^°•° ° Page 4 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN- AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, November 5, 1998, at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, November 5, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Jan Debay, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager John Collins, Past Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Brian Donahue John Linder, Construction Manager Burnie Dunlap, Board Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Eva Miner-Bradford Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Christina Shea Mark Esquer, Engineering Manager Dave Sullivan Dean Fisher, Engineer Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Gail Cain, Executive Assistant Directors Absent: OTHERS PRESENT: Patsy Marshall Craig Farrington, General Counsel Bob Zemel Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. OCSO • P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 V Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 2 November 5, 1998 (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the October 8, 1998 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that he and Director Swan had a meeting with Crow Winthrop on Monday, November 2, 1998, to discuss their lawsuit. (7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager reported that on Tuesday, November 3, 1998, the Kern County Supervisors waived all the fees regarding the roads and trucks. The fees and the long-term ordinance will be taken under consideration the first quarter of 1999. They referred that matter to their Technical Advisory Committee as part of the process they'll be discussing on the regulation of biosolids. Next week, there will be discussions with the editorial board of the Bakersfield Californian. We expect to see an editorial position of the local paper in a week. (8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering requested Committee's approval to issue a Change Order not to exceed $100,000 to do grading for two storm water retention basins. Bids will be solicited from existing, on- site contractors. It was the consensus of the Committee members that staff proceed with the change order and do the work. Staff advised they would be taking bids, and that information would be reported to the Committee members. The Director of Engineering introduced the Engineering Manager,who updated the PDC Committee on progress to date on Project P2-60, Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 2. The project is currently between the 50% and 85% design points. Changes to the project scope have increased the engineer's cost estimate from $7.3 million to $11.4 million. Differences in the cost estimate are due to the addition of cake transfer pumps, new solids hopper sliding frame technology, pile foundation requirements, and electrical upgrades. The project will be presented to the PDC Committee in February 1999, when approval of the plans and specifications is expected to be requested. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent (5%). Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 3 November 5, 1998 (11) ACTION ITEMS (Items No. ac) a. PDC98-44: Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plants No. 1 and 2, Job No. P1-40-2R/P247-2R, with Margate Construction for a net addition amount of$56,047 and 228 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to$1,973,675. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve this item. b. PDC98-45: Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-Q-3, for additional planning and design services in the amount of$293,022 for a total amount not to exceed $1,403,740. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried, with six yes and two no votes, to recommend approval. c. PDC98-46: Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2A2, for an additional amount of$62,993, increasing the total amount not to exceed $7,119,469. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. (12) CLOSED SESSION The Committee Chair reported to the Committee the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9, in order to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda, to wit: Walcon Construction Co.. Inc. v. County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 782457. She reported that the item could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) upon a two-thirds' vote of the Committee. No other item would be discussed or acted upon. Upon the unanimous vote of all members present to add an item to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), the Committee convened in closed session at 6:30 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the dosed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final. At 6:45 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY None. i Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 4 November 5, 1998 (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. (16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, December 3, 1998. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Submitted by: ad t .-^.i Gail Cain PDC Committee Secretary H:4vp.dta'enp1PDCIPDC98 W O W Anutes.dw PDC COMMITTEE memna ox� rcx ads. 11/OS/9a 1111814 AGENDA REPORT HmmNumber RemNum r pDe9a-V, C Orange County Sanitation Di FROM: David Ludw rector of Engineering Originator: Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN PHASE 2, TREATMENT, REUSE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES, JOB NO. J-40-3, ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) WITH CAMP DRESSER AND MCKEE, INC. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-3, for additional planning and design services in the amount of$293,022 for a total amount not to exceed $1,403,740. SUMMARY Additional work has been required of Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM) to complete Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan. The additional work includes revisions to Strategic Plan documents, changes in planning assumptions, and additional support due to the extended project schedule. This additional work is beyond the scope that was envisioned when the PSA was amended in January 1998. The majority of the additional effort was performed incrementally by CDM from May through August 1998. Over time, the additional tasks accumulated and became significant. Although staff realized that some of the work was out of scope, at the time the work was being done, staff believed that sufficient consultant budget was available to complete the work. CDM did not inform the District of the magnitude of the extra work or the associated cost until September 1998. The fee for this additional work is $236,11 B. As a good faith gesture, and to show their commitment as a team member on the project, CDM has agreed to be compensated for the additional work at their cost with no allowance for profit. This proposed increase also does not include $50,000 of additional costs that CDM has incurred and agreed to write off and not attempt to recover. One of staffs project management responsibilities is to assure that the consultant's work is completed within budget. We also require our consultants to keep our staff informed as to the status of work efforts and budget compliance. We will continue to stress the importance of proactive budget management to our project management staff and our consultants. A comprehensive project management training program is in Page 1 development that will address this issue. In the interim, our staff and supervisors have ' been instructed to provide a higher level of budget oversight and communication with the PDC Committee and our Board of Directors. For the remainder of this project, CDM will be required to provide monthly status reports outlining project progress, budget compliance, and potential areas of concern. If requested, the status report for the previous month can be reported to the Ad Hod Steering Committee on a monthly basis. In addition to the Strategic Plan, all current projects are being reviewed to assure that consultant progress reports are contractually required and are being submitted. In addition to the completed work, CDM has proposed future work necessary for completion of the Strategic Plan including: • Revising all volumes of the Strategic Plan to reflect the agency's name change to Orange County Sanitation District. ' • Providing for additional review and revisions to Capital Improvement Program (CIP) information. • Providing continued project support, participation in project management meetings, and coordination efforts with EIR consultants. Staff is requesting an additional authorization of$56,904 for this upcoming work. As with the work described above, CDM has agreed to complete the work at their cost, with no profit. The combined fee for the additional completed and future work described above is $293,022. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total additional fee of$293,022 is 10% of CDM's existing total budget of$2,929,178 for Phases 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan. Please refer to the attached Professional Services Agreement Status Report. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item). There are sufficient unexpended funds in the combined Strategic Plan project budgets for phases 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan (Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, Job No. J-40-1; Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedules, Job No. J-40-2; and Treatment, Disposal & Reuse Plan, Job No. J-40-3) to cover the additional fees. See attached Budget Information Table. Page 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WORK COMPLETED: The fallowing represents the additional work completed thus far: Technical Memos - In the January 1998 addendum, staff requested that technical memos be prepared documenting the underlying engineering assumptions of the Strategic Plan. They were prepared and reviewed by Engineering, 0 & M, Finance, GSA and Technical Services. To better communicate and serve our internal stakeholders, a collaborative process formed between the departments. The group, known as the Technical Advisory Group (TAG), generated significant comments and information during the review process beyond what was projected when the addendum was issued. The large volume of comments reflected the fad that the technical memo effort was underestimated initially. To address these comments, CDM performed additional work, increasing the overall length of the technical memos from the contracted 70 pages (seven memos 10 pages each) to over 360 pages (9 memos averaging 42 pages in length). The technical memos were finalized during April and May 1998. The review and comment process was necessary to ensure documentation that resulted in the best information available for the Strategic Plan. The information will serve in prioritizing construction of future capital projects. It will also be useful in making future technical and operational decisions, particularly in light of the agency's reinvention efforts. Planning Issues - In June 1998, after completion of the technical memos, a number of important assumptions changed. The changes required a level of engineering effort beyond the scope of work. The additional work included: • Support for Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)—The initial engineering work on the treatment facilities (Volume 4)was based upon the GWRS secondary effluent quality requirements provided in a March 1998 memorandum from Orange County Water District (OCWD). To meet the GWRS requirements, CDM determined that a $40 million secondary treatment expansion was necessary. In June 1998, District Staff, OCWD, CDM, and the GWRS consultants (Black and Veatch and Carollo Engineers) developed an alternate plan to reduce the amount of secondary facilities supporting GWRS. It was decided that the District's existing secondary facilities could be operated at a higher flow rate, increasing the effluent solids content. To compensate for the higher solids content, the GWRS would include $5 million in additional microfilters. Although this decision required CDM to revise engineering work that they had already completed, the revised plan reduces future secondary treatment construction by approximately $40 million. Page 3 • Urban Design Element - The Strategic Plan includes a landscaping improvement ' plan to visually screen the area along Pacific Coast Highway at the south boundary of Plant No. 2. CDM is required to coordinate the design with the City of Huntington Beach (City) and the California Department of Fish and Game (DF& G). Consensus between these agencies has been difficult, requiring more meetings and revisions to the plans than originally anticipated. In July 1998, Staff directed CDM to modify plans previously agreed upon by the City and incorporate changes recommended by DF&G. The work was necessary to move forward with the project and maintain a good relationship with the agencies involved. 50/50 Discharge Criteria -The original scope addressed two discharge scenarios, the NPDES permit limits, and full secondary treatment. In July 1998, in preparation for the August Board workshop, CDM analyzed the impact of GWRS on the District's current policy of discharging a blended effluent consisting of 50 percent primary and 50 percent secondary effluents (50/50 policy). Although this analysis was not included in the original scope, it was required to demonstrate the major differences in cost between the District's 50/50 policy with and without GWRS. Increased Staff and Board Support— Due to the highly collaborative nature of this project, an increased level of technical and management analysis, decision-making, and internal and external communication was required beyond what was originally estimated. The meetings were necessary to provide the required communication with the various stakeholders (Board, Public, and Management). The following additional meetings were required beyond the original scope: -Thirty biweekly management meetings (Technical Advisory Group and Management Advisory Group) -One Board Workshop -One RAC Meeting -Three Ad Hoc Committee Meetings PROPOSED ADDITIONAL WORK: The following represents proposed upcoming work: Name Chanae - On July 1, 1998, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) became the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). In addition, the individual Districts were renamed as Revenue Areas as part of consolidation. Based on these changes, all Strategic Plan volumes will need to be revised. Over 700 pages of text and 200 figures and tables are affected by the name change, as well as associated grammar (singular versus plural). Since the document will not be adopted until July 1999 (one year after consolidation), a name change is being recommended. Interim Submittal for Capital Improvement Prooram (CIP)—The new facilities identified in the Strategic Plan will need to be combined with the District's existing five year capital Page 4 program and future rehabilitation and replacement projects. An additional interim submittal of the CIP will be required to assure that project phasing and budgeting has been reviewed and analyzed by District Staff, and that the District's input is included in the final CIP. An interim submittal will require CDM to conduct additional meetings with Staff and make revisions to the draft CIP prior to finalizing. Ongoing Management and Enaineen a Support -Staff informed the Ad Hoc and Steering Committees at the July 29 meeting that additional strategic planning costs would be incurred for future work due to extension of the project schedule. The schedule was extended to allow time to receive direction from the Board on the designated preferred alternative for the Strategic Plan, prior to moving forward with the CIP and the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This resulted in a Board Workshop being held on August 22, with recommendations presented to the full Board of Directors at the September 23id meeting. The additional time required to receive Board direction on the preferred alternative has extended CDM's efforts beyond the scheduled completion by the end of July. While a large part of the Strategic Plan has been completed and reviewed by the District, there is significant effort remaining, requiring continued consultant support. The support services include a number of ongoing responsibilities, including: - Eight Project Management Meetings - One Ad Hoc Committee Meetings - One Board Workshops - Four coordination meetings with the EIR consultants PROPOSED ADDENDUM NO. 4 COST SUMMARY: Work Completed Technical Memos $103,867 Revised Planning Issues $ 59,808 Schedule Delays/ Management Support 7$ 2,443 Subtotal $236,118 Upcoming Work Documentation; Consolidation and Name Change $ 23,304 Interim Submittals for CIP $ 22,600 Ongoing Management and Engineering Support $ 11,000 Subtotal $ 56,904 Addendum No. 4 Total $293,022 ALTERNATIVES Do not approve addendum. Should the PSA not be amended, CDM would not be compensated for extra work already completed. In addition, revisions reflecting the District's name change and refinement of the CIP would not be done. Page 5 CEOA FINDINGS None Required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 2. Budget Information Table, Phase 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan 3. Proposal letter from CDM dated October 12, 1998 JDH:jam G:WglobaMgenda Draft Re"ft\PDCUJ AR2d= Page 6 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job/Contract No. J-40-3 Phase 2 Strategic Plan Total Project Budget: $ 1,462,000 Consultant: Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. Start Dale of Project: January 22, 1997 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 1/22/97 Original PSA Phase 2 Strategic Plan—Treatment, Reuse and 673,461 673,461 Disposal Plan 1/5/98 1 Additional Energy Studies 15,049 688,510 Revised Permit Conditions, Additional Public 1/28/98 2 Involvement, and Assistance with Outstanding 397,239 1,085,749 Rate Structure Issues Develop and file a Stormwater Management Plan 9/3/98 3 with California Regional Water Quality Control 24.969 1.110,718 Board Proposed 4 Support ongoing and future activities for completion of the Strategic Plan 293,022 1,403,740 HAwp.dtetenpUOBS 8 CONTRACTSXSTRAT PLANU40.3%ddendum%Addendum Status Repod.doc 10/20/98 Revised 05H4198 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE STRATEGIC PLAN (PHASES 1 & 2) JOBS NO. J-40-1, J-40-2 & J-40-3 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROE3.222,20O2 TED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TITURE COMPLETE BUDGET. BUDGET. INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHOTE TO DATE(%) Consultant PSA' $ 2,671,000 $ 3,295200 S 3,295,200 $ 2,929,178 $ 293022 $ B,396 87% Flow Monitoring Services $ 359,800 $ 359.800 $ 359800 $ 9,800 100% Staff$Overhead $ 380,000 $ 937,260 $ 937,250 $ 937,260 $ 937,250 $ 871.444 1 93% Contingnecy and Other $ - $ 210245 $ 210,245 $ 59645 $ 59545 $ 59645 100% TOTAL $ 3.051,000 $ 4.802,495 $ - $ 4,802,495 S 4,285.873 $ 293,022 $ 4,578,895 $ 4,099,285 on Ooee not include$239,930I.,Di.Vict 7 MepPing Plolaol. h'.Nvp Lta`engVoboconbecbtftmtp1ny-403eaddendum 4 AR budget table ' Jim tl, CDMCamp Dresser&McKee Inc. oon•wmo 1925 Palomar Oaks Way,Suite 300 a^e^ `M Carlsbad,California 92008 o,`uf y'0" Te1:760438-M5 Fat:760436.7411 RECEIVED m•ra� ' ENGINEE91NG DEPARTMENT October 12,1998 OCT 2 3 1998 COUNTY SANITATIC;J Mr.David A.Ludwin DISTRICTS OF Director of Engineering ORANGE COUNTY Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Subject: Strategic Plan,Phase 2-Job J-40-3 Addendum 4:Revisions to the.Strategic Plan Dear Mr.Ludwin: Thank you so much for meeting with us today to review the changes in scope to the strategic planning effort. As we discussed today,much has transpired since receiving Addendum 2 on January 28, 1998. Changes in technical direction,levels of detail,and schedule delays have resulted in a higher level of effort to complete the planning and engineering analyses and documentation. Although the work has provided additional benefits to the decision-making process,it has exceeded the level of effort envisioned by both CDM and OCSD in January 1998. As we are all aware,this project has been more of a"process"than a traditionally-defined project. Although the process may have seemed somewhat arduous at times,there has been a tremendous amount of valuable work performed. This work has resulted in the development of dynamic tools and documentation that will provide significant benefit to the District and the County of Orange for many years to come. Through this collaborative process,the District's staff,management,Board and public have gained significantly in the following areas: • Dynamic Tools - Collection System Model(STORM and Extran) Wastewater Treatment Facilities Model Facet Decision Model H,S Model • Detailed Documentation and Action Plans Planning and Design Criteria - Cost Criteria(capital and O&M) - Stormwater Management Plan - Water Conservation Program - Interim Flow Management Plan - Hydrogen Sulfide Study Urban Design Plan CDM Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. Mr.David A.Ludwin October 12, 1998 Page 2 • Foundation for Future Programs - GWR System Implementation - Cooperative Projects Program - Adaptive Plan for Future Regulatory Changes Because of the level of effort in gaining input and buy-in both internally(staff, management and Board) and externally(public and regulatory community),these tools and plans will be extremely useful as you proceed through the planning horizon. Additional Work Required Below,you will find a more detailed accounting of the changes in scope that have occurred in the last 8 months. We hope this documentation helps to illuminate not only the changes to the levels of effort,but the benefits gained by them. We have also included a time line to illustrate the incremental nature of the changes in scope. Planning Issues • Support of GWR System On June 1,1998,after completion of the technical memoranda documenting all of the engineering baseline assumptions and parameters,a meeting was held with the GWR System Team to review facility changes that would reduce the cost impacts of GWR System support. At that meeting,significant baseline assumptions were revised. These assumptions included use of trickling filter effluent for GWR supply water,reduction in quality of secondary effluent acceptable to GWR(increasing loading rates to clarifiers),and the pursuit of Phase I only for GWR. Although these changes significantly impacted the strategic planning efforts,the changes benefitted both OCSD and OCWD by reducing the cost of supporting GWR System by$40 million. • Innbvative Technol= The original scope of work required CDM to consider space-saving technologies to forestall possible site limitation problems at both plants. In addition,the scope required CDM to specifically consider primary effluent filtration. However, during the development of the technical memoranda,and in subsequent meetings and discussions with OCSD staff regarding Volume 4, comments from OCSD emphasized the need to consider further opportunities. Based on this input, Sections 5,6,9 and 17 of Volume 4 were revised to include innovative technology discussions for implementation of promising innovative technologies for preliminary/primary,secondary and solids processes. This additional work consolidated,evaluated and prioritized a variety of innovative process technologies and provided support to OCSD's on-going monitoring of alternative CDM Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. Mr.David A. Ludwin October 12, 1998 Page 3 processes. (It should be noted that CDM is not asking for additional compensation for this expanded scope of work.) • Urban Design I m nt As part of the development of contract documents for landscape improvements to the Plant 2 south boundary wall,CDM was required to coordinate with OCSD and the City of Huntington Beach to ensure that any proposed improvements were acceptable to the California Department of Fish and Game. In April 1998, CDM and OCSD met with the City of Huntington Beach to begin the process. Coordination with Fish and Game resulted in a meeting on July 15, 1998 which also included the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Differences between these agencies and the City required revisions by CDM to the original set of plans recommended for the area and agreed to by the City. This issue is still unresolved,and the CDM team has demobilized temporarily. Once completed, however, this project will not only result in a pleasant visual break to travelers along Pacific Coast Highway,but it will also strengthen OCSD's existing good relationships with both the City of Huntington Beach and the California Department of Fish and Game. • Odor Control/Air Emissions The original scope of work required CDM to conduct a straightforward evaluation of previous studies conducted regarding odor control scrubbers and to prepare a technical memorandum presenting recommendations to increase scrubber efficiency. This initial scope was slowly expanded by OCSD staff until "odor control"became"air emissions'which resulted in the preparation of Technical Memorandum 4A-1 which was issued in May 1998. This memorandum,consisting of over 30 pages,covers odor/VOC treatment parameters,practices and operating philosophies;air emissions permitting regulations driving odor control requirements;criteria for chemical odor treatment and biofiltration,and air emissions impacts affecting power generation. While this work provides clew benefits to OCSD in strategic planning,it has moved far beyond the original intent of the scope of work. (It should be noted that CDM is not asking for additional compensation for this expanded scope of work.) • Addition of 5050 Level of Treatment In August of 1998,staff requested that CDM consider the District's current target of achieving a blend of 50 percent primary and 50 percent secondary effluent,in addition to the original NPDES permit limits and full secondary treatment criteria. This work was requested to show the comparative impact of changing from current philosophy to the new permit limits. Through this additional CDMCamp Dresser&McKee Inc. Mr. David A. Ludwin October 12,1998 Page 4 analyses,the Board was able to make an educated decision regarding the move from current philosophy to producing an effluent meeting permit requirements. To quantify the increased level of effort,we provide the following summary: Budget $170,139(1281 hours) Actual $229,947(1976 hours) Difference$59,808(695 hours) Technical Memoranda The original concept and intent of the development of technical memoranda was to confirm thb fundamental assumptions and"building blocks"which had been developed in 1997. These memoranda were to incorporate work that had been previously completed. The understanding was that these memoranda would be short(t10 pages) with minimum review of the contents. After receipt of the Addendum 2,however,the scope and breadth of the Technical Memoranda changed considerably. The Memoranda became a tool for greater staff collaboration,input and review of the baseline decisions,an opportunity for staff to reconsider assumptions that had been previously made,and a chance for more in-depth documentation of background information and description of tools and methodology used to reach the decisions made. This process afforded the District the additional opportunity to take full advantage of the extertise and knowledge of the staff in Operation&Maintenance,Technical Services and Engineering and Planning. Although this greater level of participation and detailed analyses and documentation will help make these tools more accepted and utilized,the effort to complete the documents far exceeded the originally anticipated level. To quantify the increased level of effort,we provide the following summary: - Original 7 memos,10 pages each,5 reviewers,level of comments-1 week turn around - Actual 9 memos,average 47 pages each(excluding appendices),20-25 reviewers, average 70 comments per memo,2 to 3 weeks to address Budget $109568(879 hours) Actual $213,435 (1888 hours) Difference$103,867(1009 hours) CDM Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. Mr.David A. Ludwin October 12,1998 Page Schedule Delays/Increase in Management As you know,the schedule for completion and the number of meetings required for planning,education,and decision-making have been expanded as the process has progressed. In reviewing the contractual requirements(original agreement plus addenda)for meetings compared with the actual number of formal meetings(excluding informal staff-level discussions),the additional effort has been substantial,but warranted in bringing the necessary parties toward decision. To quantify the increased level of effort,we provide the following summary: Meetinp By Contract Actual (as of 10-10-98) Bi-weekly(STRAP,TAG) 54 84 Board Workshops 8 9 RAC/PAC 16 17 Ad Hoc 9 12 Budget $454,379(3,504 hours) Actual $526,822(3,959 hours) Difference:$72,443(455 hours) Additional Work Efforts Required • Name Change On July 1,1998,the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(CSDOC) became the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD). In addition,the title of each individual member District was changed from District to Revenue Area. All Strategic Plan volumes need to be revised to reflect these recent changes. Over 700 pages of text and 200 figures and tables are affected as well as associated grammar(singular versus plural). • Additional Technical Review/Comments With the exception of the Volume 3,the scope of work required the submittal of only a draft 50%and a final submittal for each volume of the Strategic Plan. However,it has become clear that staff require at least one other opportunity to review the portions of key volumes which present Capital Improvement Program (CEP)information. Single submittals of the draft CIPs for the collection system, treatment facilities and disposal system will be prepared by CDM for review by OCSD staff. CIP adjustments and phasing of expenditures to the collection system,treatment plants and disposal system will be performed by OCSD staff in =M Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. Mr.David A.Ludwin October 12,1998 Page 6 working sessions with CDM staff. The resultant comments will be provided to CDM for incorporation into the final CIP. This process has already been discussed with staff and has been accepted by them to finalize the CIP. • Ongoing Management and Entneering Support The current Strategic Plan effort was scheduled to be completed by the end of July 1998. While a large part of the work has been completed and reviewed by OCSD, the continued participation of CDM to provide support to the Strategic Plan effort through mid-1999 is seen by OCSD and CDM has beneficial. To provide this support on an on-call basis,an upper limit not-to-exceed value for these services has been established by OCSD. The extent,timing and level of effort of all support efforts provided under this task will be defined by OCSD in advance. CDM will endeavor to make available those staff requested by OCSD at the locations and times proposed by OCSD. In this way,CDM's expertise in the strategic planning process will continue to be available to OCSD. Level of Effort The level of effort that has been expended and will be needed to complete the work outlined above is broken down in the attached Table 1. As you can see,the fee needed to complete the work is$293,022. As we are all aware of budget constraints and the need to minimize impacts to the District,we are offering that CDM be compensated on an"at cost"basis for the work outlined herein. Thank you for your consideration of this requested addendum. We are proud to be a part of this important planning process and have enjoyed the team spirit that has been fostered. We look forward to the successful completion of this useful,dynamic plan. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER&MdCiE INC. Kellene M.Bum-Lucht,P.E. Senior Vice President KMBL:hs: I:Wad\proprs M0,12 m prp CC. Jim Herberg,OCSD Paul Gustafson,CDM CDMCamp Dresser&McKee Inc. Mr.David A.Ludwin October 12, 1998 Page 7 Table 1 Description of Tasks Summary of Labor Hours and Fee Description Estimated/ Estimated/ Actual Actual Cost Labor Hours Planning Issues 695 $59,808 Technical Memoranda 1009 $103,867 Schedule Delays/Increase in 455 $72,443 Management Name Change 244 $23.304 Additional Technical Review/Comments 236 $22,600 Ongoing Support 118 $11,000 Total 2757 $293,022 PDC COMMITTEE Ne„roeenyom Te /sa la.mx . s/se r AGENDA REPORT Item Num. IWMm Iw nc98-46 ( Orange County Sanitation Disbi FROM: David Lud , erector of Engineering Originator: Dean Fisher, Engineer SUBJECT: SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-36, AND SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Carollo Engineers for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P242, for an additional amount of$62,993, increasing the total amount not to exceed $7,119,469. SUMMARY The construction of the Secondary Treatment Improvement Project at Plant No. 1 is the final phase of a multi-project design and construction effort. The construction of this final phase is now 99% complete. This project contains a significant amount of automation and associated programming in order to control the process. An addendum was issued to Carollo earlier in this project to add programming services to their PSA. Implementing and testing this software while coordinating with the construction schedule has proven to be more time consuming than first realized. Sequencing the construction to replace equipment while keeping the plant in service requires that equipment be placed on-line in phases. This results in a start-stop work schedule that taxes resources. In addition, other change orders on the project have lengthened the construction schedule when the original programming addendum was written. This has caused an increase in the projected amount of overhead and labor costs from that originally proposed. For these reasons, the programming effort requires additional compensation in order to complete the project. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached PSA Status Report. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:A.3.b) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) See attached Budget Information Table. nndcnVmlb WbgWM a LOMACT 1.WIR Addendum W etrc R„.. &,� Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project Summary Job No. P1-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, consists of expanding the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. The project provides ten new secondary clarifiers, replacement of the existing aeration system, replacement of the existing blowers, renovation of three existing dissolved air flotation thickeners, three new dissolved air flotation thickeners and other improvements. These improvements will increase the secondary treatment capacity from forty-six million gallons per day to eighty million gallons per day. The contract also includes a new pump station for the Orange County Water District for which the District will be reimbursed. Carollo Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction, Inc. on September 18, 1995. The original PSA to Carollo Engineers to provide design services for this project was executed on October 11, 1989. Since that time, seven addenda have modified or added to this original PSA. Addendum No. 1 was ratified in November 1990 for additional design services adding elements to the project. Addendum No. 2 was ratified in June 1993 for air diffuser system studies and miscellaneous design changes. Addendum No. 3 was ratified in April 1994 for additional costs relating to schedule changes and miscellaneous additions. Addendum No. 4 was ratified in June 1995 to add programming services and additional construction support. Addendum No. 5 was ratified in November 1996 for services to perform an electrical coordination study. Addendum No. 6 was ratified in January 1997 to provide additional training and construction support services. Addendum No. 7 was ratified in March 1997 to add and revise elements to the programming services. Addendum No. 8 is proposed to add additional programming services in order to complete the necessary testing and training on the completed programming in order to meet the Districts needs. Please refer to the attached PSA Status Sheet. Addendum No. 8 —Additional Programming Required Addendum No. 4 originally added programming services to the Carollo scope of work, which included programming the three automatic controllers and associated graphic interfaces to automate the project and other services including testing and documentation. This addendum was based on the information known at the time and was based on computer systems used at the time, but has since proved to be insufficient to complete all of the work required. This proposal did not take into account several elements that have evolved during the completion of this project such as: • The piecemeal nature of meeting the construction schedule. This schedule is far more detailed than any used to estimate programming time and has been modified numerous times during the course of construction. Keeping the plant in service while replacing nearly all of the equipment results in a phased schedule where only small pieces can be completed at a time. The results in a start-stop work schedule as well as making provisions for a working system when all of the components may not be completed. %WdonbablM Wb,gUOB &COM ACTS 1. fi IRAddendum No.8. R—. &1w Page 2 A • The use of a relatively new graphical interface software package that has resulted in additional efforts while the software manufacturer corrects problems discovered by programmers. The requirements of configuring the control system to control the specific equipment used on the project, the details of which were unknown before the project bid and submittal phase. • Special requirements placed on the project staff when removing existing equipment from one control system and place it on the new system, and configuring special alarms and some custom programming to meet the Operations Staff needs. • Reduced District staff resources in assisting with the coordination of testing and startup. During the latter part of this project, several other projects are also in the testing and startup phase, including the Primary Clarifier Rehabilitation Project(s), the City Water Improvements Project(s) and the Main Street Pump Station Improvements. This has led to some additional coordination efforts on the part of the consultant. To compensate for the above and allow for the continuation of programming, testing, and startup, this proposed addendum provides an additional $67,460 to Direct Labor and Overhead, while subtracting $4,467 from the Other Direct Costs, resulting in a net addition to the PSA of$62,993. The Fixed Profit remains unchanged as this addendum only compensates for the additional labor and overhead needed to complete the work. This modifies the total not to exceed amount of the PSA to $7,119,469. Please refer to the Proposal Letter for Carollo Engineers dated October 26, 1998. Project Billing and Timeline A portion of this addendum amount compensates for additional programming hours billed to the project that are beyond the previously approved Addendum No. 4. A potential for a PSA budget shortfall has been known and discussed between the District and Carollo for the last 90 days. During that time negotiations and ongoing project work hampered a quick resolution to this problem. District staff expected the consultant to be able to complete the contract work within the budget and timeframe required. As the startup progressed it was evident that more effort was being expended than anyone projected, both in District staff time and programming effort. District staff had to rely on the consultant for additional assistance on this project as staff was working on several projects that required startup expertise. The District continued to negotiate with Carollo, but did not direct the programmers to stop in order to keep the construction contractor on schedule. Programming and testing the controls, unlike other design consultant tasks, directly affects the contractor's schedule. The startup testing was treated as a priority over the PSA programming time for bath the District staff and Carollo as there was insufficient staffing to concentrate on both issues concurrently. nxadanWmaln,GbMn9WM&WNMACiS%30WR Addendum No.Odc aa:sed: WIM98 Page 3 Once the construction schedule was satisfied and there was a breaking point, negotiations resumed resulting in this addendum request. The resulting billing amount in excess of the original addendum is approximately $25,000. IV Project Budget The project budget is sufficient to cover to the additional costs of the proposed addendum, however a reallocation between the budget tasks is required. The proposed budget changes would reallocate $62,993 from the Staff and Support task into the Design task in order to increase the authorized budget for the design Consultant. There is no increase or change to the total project budget. Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ALTERNATIVES None ATTACHMENTS 1. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 2. Budget Information Table 3. Proposal letter from Carollo Engineers dated October 26, 1998 NMon`JM\Mp4p WOW WO ARMS WAJGeMum No Bme N' W, Page 4 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. P1-36 and P2-42 Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2 Total Project Budget: $40,800,000.00 Consultant: Carollo Engineers Start Date of Project: October 11, 1989 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 10-11-89 Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 $4,997,841 $4,997,841 Original PSA and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2 11-14-90 Modifications to design, Design of A.S. lab at Plant $180,232 $5,178,073 1 No. 1 DAFs, 36-inch Drain at Plant 1, 84-inch Bypass at Plant No. 2. 6-9-93 2 Air Diffuser Study, Miscellaneous Changes. $303 680 $5,481,753 4-26-95 Replacement pumps at Headworks C, Headworks $407,397 $5,889,150 B equipment hatch, Prequalification of pumps, 3 Relocation of Sidestream Pump Station, Flowmeter, Observation Deck, Aeration System modifications. 6-26-95 4 Additional Construction Services and PLC/MMI $750,215 $6,639,365 Programming. 11-12-96 5 Elect. Coordination Study $17,256 $6 656 621 1-22-97 6 Additional Construction Services and O&M $374,909 $7,031,530 Manuals. 3-18-97 7 Changes to Control System and Programming for $24,946 $7,056,476 Blower/Aeration Control and Sludge Valve Control. Proposed 8 Additional Programming Services for Testing and $62,993 $7,119,469 Coordination. Hflwp dta�ng�OBS 8 CONTRACT51P1-3 2VWd.8 PSA SIatn.dw 1027/98 Revised 0511 /98 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. Pt-36-2 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNS THIS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED TOTAL AUTHORIZA71ON EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGETDAT DATE REQUEST DATE DATE(%) Design' S 1,406065 $ 1,406,055 $ 62.993 S 1,469,056 $ 1.406.065 $ 62,993 $ 1,469.0541 S 1,302,300 89% Construction S 35,835,690 S 35,635SW S 35,835,690 S 35,499,357 S 35,199.357 S 35,297.330 99% Staff and Support S 3,356,245 1 S 3,556,245 1$ 62,993 $ 3,495.252 $ 3,558245 S 62,993 $ 3,495,252 S 1,981,302 57% TOTAL $ 40,600,000 $ 40,800,000 3 - f 40,800000 S 40,463,fi6] 3 - 3 40,453,667 S 36,560,932 95% "Design"represents the portion of the Design Consultant PSA associated with the Pl-36-2 project. H:1 PAWw scmu SI91.36wMmdum 6.aT R.."08125/98 c ENC.'lJFc?(?�G ��LL�C" DEYRT7vVT rne,.l,r.dr,.. .n:,e V <� a nG r n e e r s OCT ? 7 1999 ""' „;';°";"°""""" b,w ry COUNTY SANMATICA DISTRICTS OF ORAN3'c COJw-f October 27, 1998 3340A2A Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Subject: Secondary Treatment expansion at Plant No. 1 Job No. P7-36-2 Programming and Construction Services Budget Dear Mr. Ludwin: For more than three years, Carollo has been providing construction services and PLC/HMI programming services for the Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 1. In that time, we have completed a major percentage of the work in our scope. Construction is now essentially complete, and the PLC/HMIs at the DAF Complex (CPSCP4) and the RAS Pump Station (CP-RW) have been installed and tested, and are currently operating the equipment in a fully automatic mode. The programming and startup for these two PLC/HMI's are essentially complete. The programs for the aeration system PLC/HMI at the Blower Building (CP-BB) are currently installed, and have been partially tested. They are capable of operating most of the equipment in a manual operating mode. Over the next several weeks, we expect to test and place into service the automatic controls for the aeration system, which will complete our programming effort. We have prepared this letter to advise the Districts of our current budget status. As of September 30, 1998,we estimate there are sufficient funds remaining in our budget allocation to provide approximately 260 labor hours of work at our current labor rates. We estimate that a total of 891 labor hours are necessary to complete the work in our programming and construction services scope. This 631 labor hour budget shortfall is primarily the result of add'Rional effort spent on programming services during startup. This shortfall has occurred for a variety of reasons, which we consider to be beyond our control, or could not have been foreseen at the time our estimate for performing this work was prepared.The reasons are as follows: 1. The project has extended well beyond the scheduled completion date. Carollo prepared the programming and construction services budgets, based on a thirty month construction schedule. This project has extended well beyond the scheduled completion date, and it appears as though the work will not be complete until S:\33e0AkA\LETTERNUVJ ,Pd 3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92704 • (714) 540-4300 • TAX (714) 540.4349 b Mr. David Ludwin Orange County Sanitation District October 27, 1998 Page No. 2 December 1998. We have been attending coordination meetings, and dealing with programming and startup issues for several months longer than projected in our estimate. 2. Resolving problems during startup has, in many cases, been a process of elimination, where the mechanical components, electrical wiring, and PLC/HMI controls all have to be checked against each other until the problems can be identified and corrected.The level of effort required in coordinating startup of equipment and program testing between Carollo, Contractor, and the Districts has been significantly greater than was included in our estimate. 3. There have been a number of other Districts' projects going through startup at the same time as this project. Districts inspection staff have been called away on several occasions, sometimes for several days. In general, we have assigned our staff to other projects during these periods, but starting and stopping of the program testing on this project has resulted in delays and reduced efficiency. 4. During startup, Operations staff requested that a number of common alarms be added to the programming, and that several process data values be transmitted to the Control Center from the remote PLC's. This should not be a major effort, but communication between the Remote PLC's and the Control Center was not part of oursoope. 5. The level of effort necessary to train the Operations Department in the use of the PLC/HMI controls has been significantly greater than projected.This training is currently approximately 60 percent complete, but the training for CP-BB and the aeration system controls remains to be completed. At our current average labor and overhead rate of$106.91, we estimate the additional budget necessary to complete the additional 631 labor hours of programming startup and construction services total$67,460. SIUX 0A2AUErrEMluEn5006.wp0 3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92704 • (714) 540-4300 . FM (714) 540-4349 Mr. David Ludwin Orange County Sanitation District October 27, 1998 Page No. 3 Through September 30, 1998; Carollo's labor, fixed fee, and other direct cost funds remaining for Pt-36-2 are as follows: Funds Remaining Labor and Overhead $18,445.07 Fee $5,373.02 Other Direct Costs $19,967.07 (all Secondary Treatment/Electrification Projects) Total $43,785.16 The$19,967.07 Other Direct Costs (OCD)funds remaining are more than is necessary to complete the project. We estimate that expenses for O&M Manual reproduction, Record Drawing reproduction, subconsultant expenses, and travel through the completion of the project will be approximately$15,500. We request that the excess$4,467 CDC funds be reallocated to help cover some of the additional labor and overhead expenses described above. In summary, the cost revisions proposed in this letter are as follows: Added Direct labor and Indirect Costs $67,460 Fixed Profit $0 Other Direct Costs ($4,467) Total Request $62,993 s:{33AOATA\LEFTErnwtlxio05.wp0 3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92704 • 1714) 540-4300 • FAX (714) 540-4349 W Mr. David Ludwin Orange County Sanitation District October 27, 1998 Page No. 4 Carollo has provided on-call support for this project for more than three years. We would like to assist the Districts Staff in completing this project, but cannot do so with the funds currently allocated. We request that our allocation for this project be increased by$62,993 to cover additional costs resulting from the extended duration of the project, and additional work.Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, CARDILLO ENGINEERS, P.C. Mark S. Ludlow Project Manager f am P ' cipa MSL:JD:pmb cc: Tod Haynes (OCSD- Plant 1 Construction) Dean Fisher (OCSD-Plant 1 Construction) Mary Lee (Carollo-SAO) SA, 07v!A\LMERIWOwA105.wpC 3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92704 (714) 540.4300 FAX (714) 5404349 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS meeting Me Tonsm. wreroe AGENDA REPORT Iem Numbe Ih%rvum6a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1998 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1998. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the Districts professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The Districts Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Dislric's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) \Y. W,WlM g ftVIPcnnMAHRTAHRWWwTu.RRI d¢ R«..d IWIM Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of October 1998 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Aocounts October 31, 1998 Yield I%) Stale of Calif LAW 9 12,491,874 5.6 Union Bank Checking Amount 481,303 4.6 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 2.083.000 4.8 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 18.247.061 5.0 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 278,305.267 4.1 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 6,708 5.5 Debt Service Reserves®Trustees 32,635,323 6.2 Petty Cash 4,400 TOTAL $344,254.936 ALTERNATIVES/ None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Reports GGS:SK:lc jv,m a+we e.ol v n. AHWAr RsewaT. ,Xa: Page 2 R. 'WW c � Prepared by Finance, 11/9/98, 4:06 PM Monthly Treasurer's Report District Fund Balances $400,000,000 i I $300,000,000 H $200,000,000 j $100,000,000 — i i $0 May, 98 Jun, 98 Jul, 98 Aug, 98 Sep, 98 Oct, 98 OPIMCO-Long-term OPIMCO-Shod-tens ®Debt Service Reserves OLAIF { 13 Bank Accts O Petty Cash 0 Dist 11 GO Bond Fund G:\excel.dta\fin\2220Ngegg!\Finance\monthly treasurers report MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1WESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ending 31 October 1998) Liquid Operating Monies (603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: $18,247,087 MEW $18,247,061 Historical Cost: PIMCO $18240,375 Mellon $18:240,350 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.15 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $27,669(0.15%) 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 82% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return(%): I Month: 0.45 3 Months: 1.47 12 Months: 5.74 Year-to-Date: 4.75 Index Total Rate of Return(°/n): 1 Month: 0.40 MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ending 31 October 1998) Long Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: p�,CO 278,768,0221 Mellon 278,305,267 Historical Cost: PIMCO $275,151,960 Mellon $274,863,778 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.41 Of Index: 2.31 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $6,822,739 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 0.12 3 Months: 3.54 12 Months: 8.68 Year-to-Date: 7.57 Index Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 0.32 A OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-OCT-1998 Halloo 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ "'----- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,750,918.22 2,750,918.22 14.91% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 8,832,190.67 8,832,190.67 47.87% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 3,156,158.22 3,156,158.22 17.111 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 175,817.23 175,817.23 0.95% 0.00 7,970.51 4.53 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH S CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,915,O04.34 14,915,084.34 80.84% 0.00 7,970.51 0.05 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,325,265.63 3,331,977.00 18.06% 6,711.37 210,375.00 6.31 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,325,265.63 3,331,977.00 18.061 6,711.37 210,375.00 6.31 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS .- PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 204,067.80 204,067.80 1.11% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 204,067.60 204,067.80 1.11% 0.00 0.00 0.00 -----------a----- ------------------ -------- ----------------- -e------------- ----- NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 18,444,417.77 18,451,129.14 100.00% 6,711.37 218,345.51 1.18 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-OCT-1998 HB1100 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH -11,336,166.78 -11,336,166.78 -4.01% 0.00 0.00 0.00 RECEIVABLES 4,842,123.06 4,842,123.06 1.71% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -31,121,707.32 -31,121,707.32 -11.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 12,572,872.65 12,572,872.65 4.45% 0.00 569,979.74 4.53 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS -25,042,978.39 -25,042,878.39 -8.85% 0.00 569,979.74 -2.28 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 146,194,606.19 149,744,897.27 52.94% 3,550,291.08 9,369,437.73 6.26 U.S. AGENCIES 14,518,624.75 15,100,270.00 5.34% 581,645.25 933,550.00 6.18 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 4,545,000.00 4,542,865.00 1.61% -2,115.00 292,500.00 6.44 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 6,494,194.13 6,447,839.52 2.28% -46,354.61 441,109.91 6.84 FHLMC POOLS 25,095,210.33 24,992,648.03 8.84% -102,562.30 1,676,255.27 6.71 FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,459,238.99 7,569,232.34 2.68% 109,993.35 469,850.20 6.21 FNMA POOLS 2,283,483.66 2,289,157.31 0.811 5,673.65 139,277.71 6.08 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 290,568.38 291,672.07 0.10% 1,104.49 18,015.24 6.18 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 4,736,455.25 4,659,487.85 1.65% -76,967.40 262,620.43 5.64 BANKING 6 FINANCE 70,886,239.80 70,659,225.51 24.98% -229,014.29 4,213,281.16 5.96 INDUSTRIAL 9,903,780.00 9,405,180.00 3.33% -498,600.00 032,500.00 8.85 UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,645,650.00 2.70% 148,395.00 450,000.00 5.89 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 299,906,656.48 303,348,145.70 107.25% 3,441,409.22 19,098,397.65 6.30 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,542,003.17 4,542,003.17 1.61% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,542,003.17 4,542,003.17 1.61% 0.00 0.00 0.00 .................. .................. ........ ................. ................ ------- NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 279,405,781.26 282,847,270.48 100.00% 3,441,489.22 19,668,377.39 6.95 Page 1 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 1 OCSF07511102 1998/10/31 RUN DATE : 11/05/98 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 24.59.53 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH B CASH EQUIVALENTS 175,827.23 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGM .000 4.694 AAA 100.000 175,817.23 1.17 996085247 175,827.23 .96 1,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MG CORP DISC 4.808 .000 P-1 99.205 1,686,485.00 11.30 313397T68 MAT 12/18/1998 11686,485.00 9.24 3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MG CORP DISC 5.017 .000 P-1 99.667 3,687,666.67 24.72 313397Q53 MAT 11/23/1998 3,687,666.67 20.21 200,000.00 OU PONT BE NEMOUR DISC 5.076 .000 P-1 99.481 198,961.% 1.33 26354BLR1 11/25/1998 198,961.94 1.09 800,000.00 FORD MR CA CO DISC 5.287 .000 P-1 98.282 766,259.78 5.27 34539UMS 01/27/1999 786,259.78 4.31 2,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN RIG CORP DISC 5.354 .000 P-1 96.708 2,665,119.00 17.86 313397577 MAT IV21/1998 2,663,119.00 14.61 900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN RIG CORP DISC 5.448 .000 P-1 99.II5 792,920.00 5.31 313397N49 MAT 11/06/1998 792,920.00 4.35 900,DOO.00 IBM DISC 5.494 .000 P-1 98.113 883,021.50 5.92 449228ND6 01/13/1999 883,021.50 4.84 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN DISC 5.495 .000 P-1 98.630 3,156,158.22 21.16 313589N41 MAT 11/06/1998 3,156,158.22 17.30 900,000.00 GMAC DISC 5.608 .000 P-1 98.075 982,675.00 5.91 37042ELJ8 11/18/1998 802,675.00 4.84 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.OL7 .105 14,91510".34 100.00 14,915,084.34 81.75 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,300,D00.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.585 6.314 AAA 100.969 3,325,265.63 100.00 912827K72 06.375% 05/15/1999 DO OS/15/96 3,331,977.00 18.26 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 2 OCSF07511102 1990/10/31 RUN OATS 11/O3/96 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 14.59.53 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOO( YIELD RATING PRICE NARXET VALUE X TOTAL -""' """""""""'----""" """' -"-"' ""-"" -------- """'""" ------"" ________ _______ _________________ _________ TOTAL FINED INCOME SECURITIES S.SBS 6.314 3,325,265.63 1D0.00 3,331,9T1.00 18.26 TOTAL 5.040 .356 18,240,349.97 100.00 18,247,061.34 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSF07522202 1998/10/31 RUN DATE : 11/05/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING MAN TIME : 14.59.53 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 12,572,872.65 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH FONT .000 4.694 AAA 100.000 12,572,972.65 100.00 996085247 12,372,872.65 3.98 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 4.6% 12,572,872.65 1DO.00 12,572,872.65 3.98 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR MY CORP GLOBAL NT .000 6.434 A2 90.079 1,992,800.00 .59 066365DN4 FLTG RT 05/12/2003 OD 05/11/96 1,BOI,SBD.00 .57 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN .000 5.846 A2 99.328 3,498,615.00 1.14 17120QESO FLTG RT O6/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 3,476,460.00 1.10 456,845.54 FNMA POOL B0065581 .000 6.0" AAA 100.969 462,143.29 .15 31362H2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/D1/88 463,291.55 .15 2,000,D00.00 FORD MR CA CO TERM ENHANCED .000 5.803 Al 99.734 1,998,613.60 .65 M5397SM FLTG RT 08/27/2D06 DO 08/27/98 119941680.00 .63 4,000,000.00 FORD HTR CA HTN TRANCHE AIR 96 .000 5.480 Al 99.997 3,970,480.00 1.31 345402DZ1 FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 31999,880.00 1.27 7,1DO,000.00 FORD MOTOR CA MTN TR 8 00177 .000 4.373 Al 99.703 6,999,749.00 2.33 345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 OD 03/30/94 7,078,913.00 2.24 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS .DDO 5.894 A2 98.189 3,918,70.50 1.27 370425QV5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 OD 08/17/98 3,878,465.50 1.23 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT .000 6.185 A3 100.037 21999,310.00 .98 423328AZ6 FLTG RT 04/27/2999 DO 04/27/% 3,001,110.00 .95 4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL HTN .000 5.923 A3 99.734 41000,000.0% 1.31 42333HJN3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 DO 04/07/98 3,989,360.00 1.26 4,000,000.09 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN .000 6.D18 AZ 98.822 4,000,000.00 1.30 44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 3,952,880.00 1.25 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR A00570 .000 5.792 A2 99.161 999,188.90 .32 44181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 OD 09/04/96 991,610.00 .31 YLOAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 4 OCSF07522202 1998/10/31 RUN DATE 11/05/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 14.59.53 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COSY/ I TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ _-_ -------- -________- 7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN NITTER SR NOTES .000 5.690 Al 99.765 71003,710.00 2.30 61745ELT6 FLTG RT OU23/2000 GO 02/23/98 6,983,550.00 2.21 4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSM 98-2 Al .000 5.636 AAA 98.375 4,736,455.25 2.53 78442GBA3 KID RT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 4,659,487.85 1.47 7,141,40.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX MT 3.699 3.627 AAA 99.937 7,118,274.19 2.35 9228273AS 3.625X 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 7,236,%4.89 2.26 30,312,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX IR 3.731 3.432 AAA 98.344 10,033,710.47 3.34 9128272M3 3.375X O1/15/2007 GD DI/15/97 10,142,118.38 3.21 8,540,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 4.179 5.921 AAA 105.562 9,034,223.67 2.95 9120272G6 06.25DX O1/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 8,972,770.00 2.84 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.234 8.662 AAA 128.437 6,233,593.75 2.11 912810DES 11.1252 09/15/2003 DO 07/05/03 61421,850.00 2.03 27,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 6.897 AAA 108.750 29,464,908.90 9.82 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 29,797,500.00 9.43 13,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.436 6.453 AAA 116.219 14,559,266.30 4.98 912827586 07.500% OV1512005 DO OVIS195 15,108,470.00 4.78 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.553 5.876 AAA 106.359 2,566,119.73 .87 912827WS 06.2507. 08/31/2002 OD 09/02/97 2,658,975.00 .84 21,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.569 6.049 AAA 105.389 22,010,625.00 7.46 912827I54 06.375X 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 22,658,635.00 7.17 5,2DD,000.00 U S TREASURY B01D1S 5.617 8.941 AAA 132.812 6,698,250.00 2.27 912010DG0 11.875% 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/83 6,906,224.00 2.29 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR IRS 5.650 6.317 AA3 102.904 1,543,215.00 .50 046003NY8 6.500X 07/15/2002 OD 07/11/97 1,543,560.00 .49 1,000,000.00 NELLER FINANCIAL INC IRS 5.760 5.775 A3 99.564 999,730.00, .32 42333WJ0 5.7502 09/25/2001 OD 09/25/98 995,640.00 .32 25,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.783 6.081 AAA 106.891 25,746,998.49 8.80 9128272WI 06.5007. 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 26,722,750.00 8.46 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.183 AAA 107.141 3,613,203.13 1.23 9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 GO 04/30/97 3,749,935.00 1.19 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OMF07522202 1998/10/31 RUN DATE 11/05/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 14.59.53 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT RUAL1'TY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE Y. TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ _--------- 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 5.915 AAA 205.636 5,086,402.25 1.74 9128272LS 06.250X OV28/2002 00 OV28197 5,282,800.00 1.67 6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MTH 5.882 5.810 AA1 100.487 5,996,400.00 1.99 63658JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 6,041,220.00 1.91 1,224,772.15 FNLMC MULTICL MG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.963 100.625 1,213,063.87 .40 3133T0205 5.900% 06/15/2017 1,222,364.48 .39 2,051,736.68 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 5.957 5.878 AAA 100.376 2,047,486.95 .67 161614AE2 5.900E 11/15/2001 GO 11YI5195 2,059,451.21 .65 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.243 AA3 102.119 2,526,725.00 .84 59018SKP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 OD 10/03/97 2,552,975.00 .81 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.886 AAA 101.942 71497,255.00 2.52 079867AK5 6.000X 06/15/2002 DD 06/15/98 71645,650.00 2.42 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO MR FNMA 6.025 6.148 AAA 100.188 2,017,343.75 .66 999ACV232 6.1607. 11/n/Z028 2,003,750.00 .63 1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 6.032 6.849 A2 104.027 1,263,862.50 .42 370425RF0 7.125X 05/01/2001 DO OS/01/97 1,300,337.50 .41 2,000,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP NTN 6.046 6.480 A2 103.390 11028,520.00 .34 37042WMI 6.700% 04/30/2001 DO 04/25/96 1,033,900.00 .33 6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 6.075 6.075 AAA 96.766 6,191,328.13 2.03 02R060613 6.000% 01/15/2029 6,172,875.00 1.95 903,708.28 FNMA POOL @0313371 6.096 6.088 AAA 100.969 910,203.68 .30 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 00 01/01/97 912,465.21 .29 29,379.89 FKMA POOL 00339016 6.104 6.0% AAA 100.969 29,591.06 .00 31375M506 6.153X 11/01/203S OD 03/01/96 291664.58 .01 875,254.75 FNHA POOL *0313600 6.144 6.101 AAA 100.969 881,545.63. .29 31374GKM8 6.143X 05/01/2036 00 06/01/97 883,M.97 .28 290,568.39 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.177 AAA 100.380 290,568.36 .09 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 OB 03/15/96 291,672.87 .09 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 6.225 6.194 A2 100.100 1,997,730.00 .65 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 2,002,000.00 .63 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF07522202 1998/10/31 RUN DATE 11/OS/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 14.59.53 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTH TR 00252 6.232 6.456 BMI 99.126 2,509,175.00 .81 SZS17PLMI 6.400% 08/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 2,478,150.00 .78 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO MR QNMA SF MTG 6.279 6.439 AAA 100.953 4,545,000.00 1.49 OIN06261S 6.5007. 01/15/2029 4,542,885.00 1." 4,5G0,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTH 6.291 5.972 AAA 104.312 4,488,705.00 2.54 31364CKV5 6.230X 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 4,6%,040.00 1.49 4,240,648.91 FMLMC MULTICLASS UP E3 A 6.316 6.303 AM IDO.332 4,245,287.12 1.40 3133TCE95 4.324% 08/15/2032 4,254,727.86 1.35 5.000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MLOSS NTH 400196 6.364 6.570 DMI 101.218 5,039,450.00 1.66 5n17PJD4 6.6507. 11/08/2000 OD 11/08/96 5,0601900.00 1.60 2,505,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC SR HTS 6.425 6.650 A2 101.506 1,317,619.35 .43 073902AN8 6.7507. 05/01/2001 DD 04/26/96 - 1,324,655.50 .42 2,000,000.00 FMLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.224 AM 104.607 2,000,888.00 .68 3133TDPV2 6.5002 09/25/2018 2,092,140.00 .66 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTH 6.577 6.308 MA 105.032 8,012,576.00 2.76 31364CBD9 6.6252 D4/18/2001 OD 04/18/96 8,402,480.00 2.66 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS HT 6.593 8.852 A2 304.502 9,9D3,780.00 3.10 718154BB2 9.2502 OVIS12000 9,405,180.00 2.98 15,839,360.94 FMLMC GROUP BGS-0476 6.628 6.923 MA 101.113 16,086,850.95 5.27 3128DDQSS 7.0007. G2/O1/2003 DO 02/01/98 16,015,653.03 5.07 3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM HTS 6.660 8.299 A2 103.931 3,227,070.00 1.02 37042RKQ4 8.6252 1/20/2000 DO 1/10/95 3,117,930.00 .99 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FMLMC GOLD SF 6.664 6.865 AM 102.968 2,817,031.25 .92 02R070600 7.D002 11/15/2028 2,804,120.00 .89 3,761,032.35 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 6.705 6.777 AM 101.453 3,843,304.94, 1.25 36225CC20 6.8757. 06/20/2027 OD 06/01/97 3,815,680.15 1.21 2,607,699.15 GNMA II POOL 00090023 6.869 6.935 MA 100.938 2,650,889.18 .86 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 OD 12/O1/96 2,632,159.37 .83 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BOWS 6.906 7.913 AM 167.437 4.029,030.31 1.37 912810DJ4 13.2502 03/15/2D14 00 05/15/84 4,185,925.00 1.32 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE T OCSF07522202 1998/30/31 RUN DATE 11/05/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RIM TIME 14.59.53 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION DOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ .......... -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.060 6.061 299,906,656.48 100.G0 503,348,145.70 96.01 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 4.054 6.069 312,479,529.13 100.00 313,921,010.35 100.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST " CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 00-OCT-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827D25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-OCT-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827SB6 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-OCT-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827V66 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.750► 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-OCT-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273A8 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 DO PONT DE NEHOUR DISC 19-OCT-1998 -198,961.94 -198,961.94 99.490972 26354BLRI 11/25/1998 19-OCT-1998 198,961.94 198,961.94 99.480972 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 DU PONT DE NEHOUR DISC 19-OCT-1998 -198,961.94 -198,961.94 99.480972 26354BLRI 11/25/1998 19-OCT-1998 -198,961.94 0.00 99.480972 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 30-OCT-1998 -3,687,666.67 -3,687,666.67 99.666666 313397053 MAT 11/23/1998 30-OCT-1998 3,687,666.67 3,687,666.67 99.666666 B GOLD14AN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 30-OCT-1998 -3,687,666.67 -3,687,666.67 99.666666 313397053 MAT 11/23/1998 30-OCT-1999 -3,687,666.67 0.00 99.666666 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 19-OCT-1998 -1,686,485.00 -1,686,485.00 99.205000 313397T68 MAT 12/18/1998 19-OCT-1998 1,686,485.00 1,686,485.00 99.205000 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 19-OCT-1998 -1,686,485.00 -1,686,485.00 99.205000 313397T68 MAT 12/18/1998 19-OCT-1998 -1,686,485.00 0.00 99.205000 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 685.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-OCT-1998 -685.88 -685.88 1.000000 996085247 01-OCT-1998 685.88 685.88 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 685.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-OCT-1998 -685.88 -685.88 1.000000 996085247 01-OCT-1998 -695.88 0.00 1.000000 FC 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,251,405.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-OCT-1998 -1,251,405.76 -1,251,405.76 1.000000 996085247 01-OCT-1999 1,251,405.76 1,251,405.76 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,251,405.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-OCT-1998 -1,251,405.76 -1,251,405.76 1.000000 996085247 01-OCT-1998 -1,251,405.76 0.00 1.000000 FC 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,186,133.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HUNT 05-OCT-1998 -5,106,133.33 -5,186,133.33 1.000000 996085247 05-OCT-1998 5,186,233.33 5,186,133.33 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 2 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,186,133.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-OCT-1998 -5,186,133.33 -5,186,133.33 1.000000 996085247 05-OCT-1998 -5,186,133.33 0.00 1.000000 FC 05-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 175,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-OCT-1998 -175,500.00 -175,500.00 1.000000 996085247 07-OCT-1998 175,500.00 175,500.00 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 175,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-OCT-1998 -175,500.00 -175,500.00 1.000000 996085247 07-OCT-1998 -175,500.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 07-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,637,770.21 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-OCT-1998 -3,637,770.21 -3,637,770.21 1.000000 996085247 15-OCT-1998 3,637,770.21 3,637,770.21 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,637,770.21 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-OCT-1998 -3,637,770.21 -3,637,770.21 1.000000 996085247 15-OCT-1998 -3,637,770.21 0.00 1.000000 PC 15-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-OCT-1998 -2,400,000.00 -2,400,000.00 1.000000 996085247 16-OCT-1999 2,400,000.00 2,400,000.00 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-OCT-1998 -2,400,000.00 -2,400,000.00 1.000000 996085247 16-OCT-1999 -2,400,000.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 16-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,870,203.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-OCT-1998 -2,870,203.44 -2,870,203.44 1.000000 996085247 20-OCT-1998 2,870,203.44 2,870,203.44 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 3 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,870,203.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-OCT-1998 -2,870,203.44 -2,870,203.44 1.000000 996085247 20-OCT-1998 -2,B70,203.44 0.00 1.000000 PC 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-OCT-1998 -2,900,000.00 -2,900,000.00 1.000000 996085247 23-OCT-1998 2,900,000.00 2,900,000.00 2.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-OCT-1990 -2,900,000.00 -2,900,000.00 1.000000 996005247 23-OCT-1998 -2,900,000.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 23-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 469,325.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NGHT 26-OCT-1999 -469,325.20 -469,325.20 1.000000 996085247 26-OCT-1998 469,325.20 469,325.20 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 469,325.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGRT 26-OCT-1998 -469,325.20 -469,325.20 1.000000 996085247 26-OCT-1998 -469,325.20 0.00 1.000000 PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 116,061.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-OCT-1990 -116,861.10 -116,861.10 1.000000 996085247 27-OCT-1998 116,861.10 116,861.10 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 116,061.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-OCT-1990 -116,861.10 -116,861.10 1.000000 996005247 27-OCT-1998 -116,861.10 0.00 1.000000 FC 27-OCT-199B 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 10,415,590.91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-OCT-1998 -10,415,598.91 -10,415,598.91 1.000000 996085247 28-OCT-1998 10,415,598.91 10,415,598.91 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 4 OCS0000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,415,598.91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-OCT-1998 -10,415,598.91 -10,415,598.91 1.000000 996085247 28-OCT-1998 -10,415,598.91 0.00 1.000000 PC 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,142,525.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-OCT-1998 -12,142,525.50 -12,142,525.50 1.000000 996085247 30-OCT-1998 12,142,525.50 12,142,525.50 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,142,525.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-OCT-1998 -12,142,525.50 -12,142,525.50 1.000000 996085247 30-OCT-1998 -12,142,525.50 0.00 1.000000 PC 30-OCT-1998 0.00 '0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 193,998.65 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 15-OCT-1998 -193,998.65 -193,998.65 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DD O6/26/1997 15-OCT-1998 193,998.65 193,998.65 1.000000 B 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 263,544.75 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 27-OCT-1998 -263,544.75 -263,544.75 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 27-OCT-1999 263,544.75 263,544.75 1.000000 B 27-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG 01-SEP-1998 -8,721,132.77 -8,721,132.77 102.601562 O1N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -8,722,132.77 0.00 102.601562 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG O1-SEP-1996 -4,527,070.29 -4,527,070.29 100.601562 01NO626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 4,527,070.29 4,527,070.29 100.601562 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG O1-SEP-1998 4,527,070.29 4,527,070.29 100.601562 _-- Page 5 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 01N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -4,527,070.29 -4,527,070.29 100.601562 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 -4,599,843.75 -4,599,843.75 102.218750 O1N0626B3 6.500% 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 4,599,843.75 4,599,843.75 102.218750 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 4,599,843.75 4,599,843.75 102.218750 O1N0626B3 6,500% 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 -4,599,843.75 -4,599,843.75 102.218750 BC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1,000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 -4,599,843.75 -4,599,843.75 102.218750 O1N0626B3 6.5001 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 4,599,843.75 4,599,843.75 102.218750 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 4,599,843.75 4,599,843.75 102.218750 O1N0626B3 6.500% 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 -4,599,843.75 -4,599,843.75 302.21B750 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.000000 O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.000000 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 -4,709,921.88 -4,709,921.88 99.156250 02R0606A3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -4,709,921.88 0.00 99.156250 FC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 -4,709,921.08 -4,709,921.88 99.156250 02RO606A3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 4,709,921.68 4,709,921.88 99.156250 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 6 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1999 4,709,921.88 4,709,921.88 99.156250 02R0606A3 6.000% 10/25/2028 14-OCT-1998 -4,709,921.88 -4,709,921.88 99.156250 BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 06-OCT-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.906250 02RO606BI 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 4,745,546.89 4,745,546.88 99.906250 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.00OOD0000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 06-OCT-1998 4,745,546.88 4,745,546.86 99.906250 02R060691 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.906250 BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF O6-OCT-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.906250 02RO60681 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 4,745,546.88 4,745,546.88 99.906250 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF O6-OCT-1998 4,745,546.88 4,745,546.88 99.906250 02RO606BI 6.0001 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.906250 BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 -1,491,796.88 -1,491,796.88 99.453125 02R060613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 1,491,796.00 1,491,796.98 99.453125 B GREENWICH CAP MKTS, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 -4,699,531.25 -4,699,531.25 98.937500 02R060613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 4,699,531.25 4,699,531.25 99.937500 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2029 14-OCT-1998 -2,804,140.63 0.00 101.968750 PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 - Paga 7 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -2,804,140.63 0.00 101.968750 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 2,804,140.63 2,804,240.63 101.968750 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 2,804,140.63 0.00 101.968750 FCC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 2,904,140.63 2,004,140.63 101.968750 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750 BC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 2,804,140.63 2,804,140.63 101.968750 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -2,804,140.63 0.00 101.968750 PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1998 0.00 O.DO 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 2,804,140.63 2,804,140.63 101.968750 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750 BC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 2,804,140.63 2,804,140.63 101.968750 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 2,804,140.63 0.00 101.968750 FCC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 07-OCT-1998 -2,817,031.25 -2,817,031.25 102.437500 02R0706BO 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 8 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 07-OCT-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500 02R0706BO 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -2,817,031.25 -2,817,031.25 102.437500 BC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 07-OCT-1998 -2,817,031.25 -2,817,031.25 102.437500 02R0706B0 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 22-SEP-1998 999,730.00 999,730.00 99.973000 42333HKJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 25-SEP-1998 -999,730.00 -999,730.00 99.973000 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 11000000000 D.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 22-SEP-1998 999,730.00 999,730.00 99.973000 42333HKJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 25-SEP-1998 999,730.00 0.00 99.973000 FCC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 28-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 -6,404,325.00 -6,404,325.00 128.086500 912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 26-JAN-1999 6,404,325.00 6,404,325.00 128.086500 B HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 -247,894.02 -247,894.02 128.086500 912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 26-JAN-2999 0.00 0.00 128.086500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 15,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-SEP-1998 -17,563,145.70 -17,563,145.70 107.877900 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 23-OCT-1998 -17,563,145.70 0.00 107.877900 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 23-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-OCT-1998 -13,414,318.50 -23,414,318.50 109.059500 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 29-OCT-199B 13,414,318.50 13,414,318.50 109.059500 B BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 9 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE NRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-OCT-1998 -418,634.51 -418,634.51 109.059500 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 29-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 109.059500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-OCT-1998 -13,832,953.01 -13,832,953.01 109.059500 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 29-OCT-1998 -13,832,953.01 0.00 109.059500 PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 29-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1998 -3,160,881.10 -3,160,881.10 108.995900 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 12-NOV-1998 3,160,881.10 3,160,881.30 108.995900 B BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1990 -106,976.90 -106,976.90 108.995900 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 OD 11/15/91 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 108.995900 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 -44,420,381.28 -44,420,381.28 101.637900 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 20-OCT-1998 -44,420,381.28 0.00 101.637900 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 20-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 -44,274,250.00 -44,274,250.00 102.250000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 19-OCT-1998 44,274,250.00 44,274,250.00 102.250000 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 -402,947.17 -402,947.17 102.250000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 102.250000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 -44,677,197.17 -44,677,197.17 102.250000 912827R20 06.875% O0/31/1999 DO O8/31/94 19-OCT-1998 -44,677,197.17 0.00 102.250000 Page 10 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1990 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-SEP-1998 -571,506.12 -571,506.12 113.280300 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 09-OCT-1998 -571,506.12 0.00 113.180300 PC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 09-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 D.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-SEP-1998 -2,996,754.46 -2,996,754.46 113.996200 912827586 07.5001 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 16-OCT-1998 -2,996,754.46 0.00 113.996200 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 -2,657,095.41 -2,657,095.41 114.262300 912827S86 07.500% 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 16-OCT-1998 -2,657,095.41 0.00 114.262300 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 16-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 -9,031,914.06 -9,031,914.06 106.257812 9128272G6 06.2501 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 19-OCT-1998 9,031,914.06 9,031,914.06 106.257812 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 -115,489.13 -115,489.13 106.257812 9126272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 106.257812 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-199B -9,147,403.19 -9,147,403.19 106.257812 9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 19-OCT-1998 -9,147,403.19 0.00 106.257812 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 -5,529,128.80 -5,529,128.80 106.329400 9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 09-NOV-1998 5,529,128.80 5,529,128.80 106.329400 B HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 -99,298.37 -89,198.37 106.329400 Page 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 09-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 106.329400 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,448,049.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 19-SEP-1998 -2,468,917.83 -2,468,917.83 99.837903 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 26-OCT-1998 -2,468,917.83 0.00 99.837903 IC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,448,432.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 -2,452,982.51 -2,452,982.51 100.185854 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 30-OCT-1998 2,452,982.51 2,452,982.51 100.185854 B BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,448,432.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 -25,806.67 -25,806.67 100.185854 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 100.185854 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,448,432.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 -2,478,789.18 -2,478,789.18 100.185854 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 30-OCT-1990 -2,478,789.18 0.00 100.185054 PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-SEP-1998 -1,059,148.69 -1,059,148.69 105.155200 9128273GS 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 14-OCT-1998 -1,059,148.69 0.00 105.155200 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 19-OCT-1998 -2,017,343.75 -2,017,343.75 100.867188 999ACV232 6.160% 11/25/2028 23-NOV-1998 2,017,343.75 2,017,343.75 100.867188 B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 -12,600.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1999 12,600.00 12,600.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 12 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1990 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 -12,600.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,723.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -7,723.00 -7,723.00 100.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 7,723.00 7,723.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,723.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -7,723.00 -7,723.00 100.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -7,723.00 0.00 100.000000 PC O1-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,163.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1999 -8,163.00 -6,163.00 100.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 8,163.00 8,163.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,163.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -8,163.00 -8,163.00 100.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -8,163.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-OCT-1998 9.00 9.00 1.000000 996085247 02-OCT-1998 -9.00 -9.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-OCT-1998 9.00 9.00 1.000000 996085247 02-OCT-1998 9.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 02-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,455,670.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-OCT-1998 2,455,670.45 2,455,670.45 1.000000 Page 13 OCBG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE ERATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996085247 08-OCT-1998 -2,455,670.45 -2,455,670.45 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,455,670.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-OCT-1999 2,455,670.45 2,455,670.45 1.000000 996085247 08-OCT-1999 2,455,670.45 0.00 1.000000 FC 08-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -571,506.12 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-OCT-1998 571,506.12 571,506.12 1.000000 996085247 09-OCT-1998 -571,506.12 -571,506.12 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -571,506.12 DREYFUS TREASURY CAST{ MGMT 09-OCT-1998 571,506.12 571,506.12 1.000000 996085247 09-OCT-1998 571,506.12 0.00 1.000000 PC 09-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,814,031.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-OCT-1998 3,914,031.52 3,014,031.52 1.000000 996005247 14-OCT-1998 -3,014,031.52 -3,814,031.52 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,814,031.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-OCT-1998 3,814,031.52 3,814,031.52 1.000000 996085247 14-OCT-1998 3,814,031.52 0.00 1.000000 PC 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,655,710.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-OCT-1990 2,655,710.59 2,655,710.59 1.000000 996085247 16-OCT-1998 -2,655,710.59 -2,655,710.59 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,655,710.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-OCT-1998 2,655,710.59 2,655,710.59 1.000000 996085247 16-OCT-1998 2,655,710.59 0.00 1.000000 PC 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Page 14 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -1,585,446.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-OCT-1996 1,505,446.94 1,585,446.94 1.000000 996005247 19-OCT-1990 -1,505,446.94 -1,585,446.94 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -1,585,446.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-OCT-1998 1,585,446.94 1,585,446.94 1.000000 996095247 19-OCT-1999 1,585,446.94 0.00 1.000000 PC 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,066,612.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-OCT-1998 3,086,672.05 3,086,672.05 1.000000 996005247 19-OCT-1998 -3,086,672.05 -3,086,672.05 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,066,672.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-OCT-2998 3,086,672.05 3,086,672.05 1.000000 996085247 19-OCT-1998 3,086,672.05 0.00 1.000000 PC 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,017,501.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-OCT-1998 4,017,501.43 4,017,501.43 1.000000 996085247 21-OCT-1998 -4,017,501.43 -4,017,501.43 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,017,501.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-OCT-1998 4,017,501.43 4,017,501.43 1.000000 996085247 21-OCT-1996 4,017,501.43 0.00 1.000000 PC 21-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,571,438.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 29-OCT-1998 10,571,438.O6 10,571,438.06 1.000000 996085247 29-OCT-1998 -10,571,438.O6 -10,571,438.06 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,571,438.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-OCT-1998 10,571,438.06 10,571,438.06 1.000000 996005247 29-OCT-1998 10,571,438.06 0.00 1.000000 PC 29-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,681,666.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-OCT-1998 3,697,666.67 3,687,666.67 1.000000 996085247 30-OCT-1998 -3,687,666.67 -3,687,666.61 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,687,666.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-OCT-1998 3,687,666.67 3,687,666.67 1.000ODO 996085247 30-OCT-1998 3,607,666.67 0.00 1.000000 PC 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -193,998.65 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-OCT-1998 193,998.65 193,998.65 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 16-OCT-1998 -193,998.65 -193,998.65 1.000000 S 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -263,544.75 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 28-OCT-1998 263,544.75 263,544.75 1.000000 996007094 VAR RT DD O6/26/1997 28-OCT-1998 -263,544.75 -263,544.75 1.000000 S 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 4,601,601.54 4,601,601.54 102.257812 O1N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -4,585,916.44 -4,585,916.44 102.257812 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 15,685.10 15,685.10 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 -4,601,601.54 -4,601,601.54 102.257812 O1N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 4,585,916.44 4,585,916.44 102.257812 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -15,685.10 -15,685.10 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUS GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 4,601,601.54 4,601,601.54 102.257812 O1N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -4,585,916.44 -4,585,916.44 102.257812 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 15,685.10 15,685.10 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 4,552,031.25 4,552,031.25 101.156250 OIN0626B3 6.500% 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 -4,599,843.75 -4,599,843.15 101.156250 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -47,812.50 -47,812.50 1.000000000 Page 16 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 -4,552,031.25 -4,552,031.25 101.156250 O1N0626B3 6.5008 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 4,599,843.75 4,599,843.75 101.156250 SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 47,812.50 47,812.50 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF O6-OCT-1998 4,746,289.06 4,746,289.06 99.921875 02R060GA3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -4,709,921.88 -4,709,921.88 99.921875 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 36,367.18 36,367.18 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF O6-OCT-1998 4,746,289.06 4,746,289.06 99.921875 02R0606A3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 4,746,209.06 0.00 99.921875 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 4,705,468.75 4,705,468.75 99.062500 02R0606BI 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.062500 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -40,078.13 -40,078.13 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 -4,705,468.75 -4,705,468.75 99.062500 02R0606B1 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 4,745,546.88 4,745,546.88 99.062500 SC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 40,078.13 40,078.13 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 07-OCT-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1996 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 102.437500 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 12,890.62 12,890.62 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 07-OCT-1098 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500 02RO706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1996 2,817,031.25 0.00 102.437500 PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 02-OCT-1998 5,062,000.00 5,062,000.00 101.240000 31364FFM8 5.880% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 05-OCT-1998 -5,000,781.25 -5,000,701.25 201.240000 Page 17 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 61,218.75 61,218.15 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 02-OCT-1998 124,133.33 124,133.33 101.240000 31364FFM8 5.880% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 05-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 101.240000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 02-OCT-1998 5,186,133.33 5,186,133.33 101.240000 31364FFMB 5.880% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 05-OCT-1998 5,186,133.33 0.00 101.240000 PC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 05-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -404,143.86 FNMA POOL #0238575 19-OCT-1998 407,553.83 407,553.83 100.843751 - 3137006LB 6.1674 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 20-OCT-1998 -407,048.65 -407,048.65 100.843751 S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 505.18 505.18 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -404,143.86 FNMA POOL #0238575 19-OCT-1999 1,307.73 1,307.73 100.843751 31370Q6L8 6.167% 03/O1/2033 DD 09/01/93 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 100.843751 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 ' LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -404,143.B6 FNMA POOL #0238575 19-OCT-1998 408,861.56 408,861.56 100.843751 3137006L8 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 20-OCT-1998 408,861.56 0.00 100.843751 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -211,B04.03 FNMA POOL #0313769 19-OCT-1998 213,591.13 213,591.13 100.843750 31374GOW0 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 20-OCT-1998 -213,326.37 -213,326.37 100.843750 S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 264.76 264.76 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -211,804.03 FNMA POOL 00313769 19-OCT-1998 688.53 680.53 100.843750 31374GQW0 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 100.843750 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -211,804.03 FNNA POOL 10313769 19-OCT-1998 214,279.66 214,279.66 100.843750 Page 18 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-2998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 RASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31374GONO 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 20-OCT-1998 214,279.66 0.00 100.843750 PC GOLDMAN SACKS 4 CO, NY 22-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -789,380.51 FNMA POOL #0313783 19-OCT-1999 796,099.79 796,099.79 100.851209 31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 20-OCT-1998 -795,054.18 -795,054.18 100.851209 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 1,045.61 1,045.61 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -789,380.51 FNMA POOL #0313783 19-OCT-1990 2,568.22 2,568.22 100.851209 31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 20-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 100.851209 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -709,380.51 FNMA POOL #0313783 19-OCT-1998 798,668.01 798,668.01 100.851209 31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 20-OCT-1998 798,668.01 0.00 100.851209 PC GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY 22-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO -585,856.57 FNMA POOL #0339016 19-OCT-1998 590,799.73 590,799.73 100.843750 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 20-OCT-1998 -590,067.42 -590,067.41 100.843750 S GOLDMAN SACHS s CO, NY ----------- 732.32 732.32 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -585,856.57 FNMA POOL #0339016 19-OCT-1998 1,905.30 1,905.30 1DO.843750 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 100.843750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -585,856.57 FNMA POOL #0339016 19-OCT-1999 592,705.03 592,705.03 100.843750 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 20-OCT-1998 592,705.03 0.00 100.843750 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,452,290.40 GNMA II POOL #0008684 27-OCT-1998 1,461,821.06 1,461,821.06 100.656250 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 30-OCT-1998 -1,476,570.87 -1,476,570.87 100.656250 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -14,749.81 -14,749.01 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 19 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ RASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -1,452,290.40 GNMA II POOL 10008684 27-OCT-1998 7,750.59 7,750.59 100.656250 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 100.656250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,452,290.40 GNMA II POOL #0008694 27-OCT-1998 1,469,571.65 1,469,571.65 100.656250 36202KUH6 7.0001 08/20/2025 DD 08/01/95 30-OCT-1998 1,469,571.65 0.00 100.656250 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 6,475,000.00 6,475,000.00 129.500000 912810DE5 11.1254 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 -6,233,593.75 -6,233,593.75 129.500000 S HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 241,406.25 241,406.25 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 114,877.72 114,877.72 129.500000 912810DE5 11.1251 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 129.500000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 6,589,877.72 6,589,877.72 129.500000 912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 6,589,077.72 0.00 129.500000 PC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 6,457,812.50 6,457,812.50 129.156250 912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DD 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 -6,404,325.00 -6,404,325.00 129.156250 S HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 53,487.50 53,497.50 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 114,877.72 114,877.72 129.156250 912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 129.156250 LS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 6,572,690.22 6,572,690.22 129.156250 912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 6,572,690.22 0.00 129.156250 PC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 20 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDDC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-2998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 RASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1998 3,162,812.50 3,162,812.50 109.062500 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 29-OCT-1998 -3,118,548.75 -3,118,548.75 109.062500 S BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK ----------- 44,263.75 44,263.75 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1998 98,702.45 98,702.45 109.062500 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 29-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 109.062500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1998 3,261,514.95 3,261,514.95 309.062500 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 29-OCT-1998 3,261,514.95 0.00 109.062500 PC BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK 29-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.OD U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 44,271,998.40 44,271,998.40 102.244800 912827R20 06.875% O8/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 20-OCT-1998 -44,141,730.35 -44,141,730.35 102.244800 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB ----------- 130,268.05 130,268.05 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 411,170.58 411,170.58 102.244800 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO OB/31/94 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 102.244800 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 44,683,166.98 44,683,168.98 102.244800 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD O0/31/94 20-OCT-2998 44,683,168.98 0.00 102.244800 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 44,274,250.00 44,274,250.00 102.250000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 19-OCT-1998 -44,141,730.35 -44,141,730.35 102.250000 S GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY ----------- 132,519.65 132,519.65 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 402,947.17 402,947.17 102.250000 912827R20 06.075% 09/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 102.250000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 21 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 44,677,197.17 44,677,197.17 102.250000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 19-OCT-1998 44,677,197.17 0.00 102.250000 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 5,531,500.00 5,531,500.00 106.375000 9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 19-OCT-1998 -5,526,819.19 -5,526,819.19 106.375000 S HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 4,600.81 4,680.81 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 70,652.17 70,652.17 106.375000 9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DD 01/31/97 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 106.375000 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 5,602,152.17 5,602,152.17 106.375000 9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 19-OCT-1998 5,602,152.17 0.00 106.375000 FC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 -2,439,292.35 -2,439,292.35 99.781250 9129273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 2,432,405.68 2,432,405.68 99.781250 SC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- -6,886.67 -6,886.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 -16,375.10 -16,375.10 99.781250 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 99.781250 Lsc ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 -2,455,667.45 -2,455,667.45 99.781250 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 -2,455,667.45 0.00 99.781250 FCC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 21-SEP-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,548,950.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-OCT-1998 2,546,153.45 2,540,153.45 99.968750 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-OCT-1998 -2,536,207.26 -2,536,207.26 99.968750 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 11,946.19 11,946.19 1.000000000 Page 22 OCS0000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,548,950.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-OCT-1998 23,099.86 23,099.86 99.968750 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 99.968750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,548,950.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-OCT-1998 2,571,253.31 2,571,253.31 99.968750 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-OCT-1998 2,571,253.31 0.00 99.968750 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 15-OCT-1998 O.DD 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,448,048.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 2,452,638.09 2,452,638.09 100.187500 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 26-OCT-1998 -2,440,096.42 -2,440,096.42 100.187500 S BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 12,541.67 12,541.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,448,048.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 24,838.04 24,838.04 100.187500 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 26-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 100.187500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO -2,448,048.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 2,477,476.13 2,477,476.13 100.187500 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 26-OCT-1998 2,477,476.13 0.00 200.187500 PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -183,011.13 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-OCT-1998 283,011.13 183,011.13 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-OCT-1998 -182,632.24 -182,632.24 100.000000 PD ----------- 378.89 378.89 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -183,011.13 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-OCT-1998 183,011.13 183,011.13 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-OCT-1998 183,011.13 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 23 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -750,619.95 FHLMC GROUP #G5-0476 01-OCT-1998 750,619.85 750,619.85 100.000000 312ODD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-OCT-1998 -762,348.28 -762,348.28 100.000000 PD ----------- -11,728.43 -11,728.43 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -750,619.85 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-OCT-1998 750,619.85 750,619.85 100.000000 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-OCT-1998 750,619.85 0.00 100.000000 FC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 117,422.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-SEP-1998 -117,422.00 -117,422.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.3241 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1998 117,550.43 117,550.43 100.000000 PDC ----------- 128.43 128.43 1.D00000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -117,421.65 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-SEP-1998 117,421.65 117,421.65 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1998 -117,550.06 -217,550.08 100.000000 PD ----------- -128.43 -128.43 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 117,421.65 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-SEP-1998 -117,421.65 -117,421.65 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1999 117,550.08 117,550.08 100.000000 PDC ----------- 128.43 128.43 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -117,421.65 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-SEP-1998 117,421.65 117,421.65 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324E 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1998 -117,550.08 -117,550.08 100.000000 PD ----------- -128.43 -128.43 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -117,421.65 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-SEP-1998 117,421.65 117,421.65 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1998 117,421.65 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -95,834.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-OCT-1998 95,834.00 95,034.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-OCT-1998 -95,938.82 -95,938.82 100.000000 PD ----------- -104.82 -104.82 1.000000000 0.00 Page 24 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDDC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,183.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-OCT-2998 47,183.70 47,183.70 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-OCT-1998 -47,117.35 -47,117.35 100.000000 PD ----------- 66.35 66.35 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,183.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-OCT-1998 -47,183.70 -47,183.70 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-OCT-1998 47,117.35 47,117.35 100.000000 PDC ----------- -66.35 -66.35 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,183.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-OCT-1996 47,183.70 47,183.70 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-OCT-1998 -47,117.35 -47,117.35 100.000000 PD ----------- 66.35 66.35 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,183.70 FNLMC MULTICL HIS P/C 1574 E O1-OCT-1998 47,183.70 47,183.70 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-OCT-1998 47,183.70 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO -8,628.62 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-OCT-1998 8,628.62 8,628.62 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-OCT-1998 -8,690.64 -8,690.64 100.000000 PD ----------- -62.02 -62.02 1.D00000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,628.62 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-OCT-1998 8,626.62 8,628.62 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-OCT-1998 8,628.62 0.00 100.000000 PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,395.63 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-OCT-1998 7,395.63 7,395.63 100.000000 3137006LB 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-OCT-1998 -7,448.79 -7,448.79 100.000000 PD ----------- -53.16 -53.16 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -7,395.63 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-OCT-1998 7,395.63 7,395.63 100.000000 3137006L8 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-OCT-1999 7,395.63 0.00 100.000000 PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 25 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,064.60 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-OCT-1999 14,064.60 14,064.60 100.000000 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 01-OCT-1990 -14,165.69 -14,165.69 100.000000 PD ----------- -101.09 -101.09 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,064.60 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-OCT-1998 -14,064.60 -14,064.60 100.000000 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-OCT-1998 14,165.69 14,165.69 100.000000 PDC ----------- 101.09 101.09 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,064.62 FNMA POOL $0313371 01-OCT-1998 14,064.62 14,064.62 100.000000 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -14,165.71 -14,165.71 100.000000 PD ----------- -101.09 -101.09 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,064.62 FNMA POOL 00313371 01-OCT-1998 14,064.62 14,064.62 100.000000 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO O2/01/97 01-OCT-1998 14,064.62 0.00 100.000000 PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,962.56 FNMA POOL 10313600 01-OCT-1998 13,961.56 13,961.56 100.000000 31374GKM8 6.143% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -14,061.91 -14,061.91 100.000000 PD ----------- -100.35 -100.35 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,961.56 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-OCT-1998 -13,961.56 -13,961.56 100.000000 31374GKMS 6.143% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 14,061.91 14,061.91 100.000000 PDC ----------- 300.35 100.35 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,961.56 FNMA POOL 00313600 01-OCT-1998 13,961.56 13,961.56 100.000000 31374GKMO 6.143% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-OCT-1999 -14,061.91 -14,061.91 100.000000 PD ----------- -100.35 -100.35 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,961.56 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-OCT-2998 13,961.56 13,961.56 100.000000 31374GKMB 6.1431 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 13,961.56 0.00 100.000000 PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 26 OCSGOOD100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,569.34 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-OCT-1999 3,569.34 3,569.34 100.000000 31374GOWO 6.1511 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -3,594.99 -3,594.99 100.000000 PD ----------- -25.65 -25.65 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,569.34 FNMA POOL 10313769 01-OCT-1998 -3,569.34 -3,569.34 100.000000 31374GQWO 6.151% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-OCT-1990 3,594.99 3,594.99 100.000000 PDC ----------- 25.65 25.65 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,569.34 FNMA POOL 10313769 01-OCT-1998 3,569.34 3,569.34 100.000000 31374GONO 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -3,594.99 -3,594.99 100.000000 PD ----------- -25.65 -25,65 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,569.34 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-OCT-1998 3,569.34 3,569.34 100.000000 31374GQVO 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-OCT-1998 3,569.34 0.00 100.000000 PC 26-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,081.77 PNNA POOL #0313783 01-OCT-1990 14,081.77 14,081.77 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.157% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-OCT-1999 -14,102.98 -14,182.98 100.000000 PD ----------- -101.21 -101.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,081.77 PUMA POOL #0313783 01-OCT-1998 -14,081.77 -14,081.77 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.157% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-OCT-1998 14,192.98 14,182.98 100.000000 PDC ----------- 101,21 101.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,081.77 FNMA POOL /0313783 01-OCT-1998 14,081.77 14,081.77 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DD 10/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -14,192.98 -14,162.98 100.000000 PD ----------- -301.21 -101.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,081.77 FNMA POOL 10313783 01-OCT-1998 14,091.77 14,061.77 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-OCT-1996 14,081.77 0.00 100.000000 Page 27 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC 27-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,792.95 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-OCT-1998 13,792.95 13,792.95 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-OCT-1998 -13,892.09 -13,992.09 100.000000 PD ----------- -99.14 -99.14 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,792.95 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-OCT-1998 -13,792.95 -13,792.95 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-OCT-1990 13,892.09 13,892.09 100.000000 PDC ----------- 99.14 99.14 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,793.71 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-OCT-1998 13,793.71 13,793.71 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-OCT-1998 -13,892.85 -13,892.85 100.D00000 PD ----------- -99.14 -99.14 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -13,793.71 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-OCT-1996 13,793.71 13,793.71 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-OCT-1998 13,793.71 0.00 100.000000 PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 . 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,755.49 FIFTH THIRD SK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-OCT-1996 22,755.49 22,755.49 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-OCT-1998 -22,755.49 -22,755.49 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,755.49 -FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-OCT-1998 22,755.49 22,755.49 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-OCT-1998 22,755.49 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -92,899.52 GNMA II POOL #0008684 01-OCT-1998 92,899.52 92,899.52 100.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DD 08/01/95 01-OCT-1998 -94,452.68 -94,452.68 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,553.16 -1,553.16 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 92,899.52 GNMA II POOL #0008684 01-OCT-1990 -92,899.52 -92,899.52 100.000000 Page 28 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST " CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 36202KUHG 7.000% 08/20/2025 DD 00/01/95 01-OCT-1998 94,452.68 94,452.60 100.000000 PDC ----------- 1,553.16 1,553.16 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -92,878.24 GNMA II POOL 00008684 01-OCT-1998 92,078.24 92,878.24 100.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 00/20/2025 DD 00/01/95 01-OCT-1998 -94,431.05 -94,431.05 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,552.81 -1,552.01 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -92,878.24 GNMA II POOL 40008684 01-OCT-1998 92,878.24 92,870.24 100.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DD 09/01/95 01-OCT-1999 92,078.24 0.00 100.000000 FC 20-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -160,474.30 GNMA II POOL 10080023 01-OCT-1998 160,474.30 160,474.30 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-OCT-1990 -163,132.16 -163,132.16 100.000000 PD ----------- -2,657.86 -2,657.86 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 160,474.30 GNMA II POOL 10080023 01-OCT-1998 -160,474.30 -160,474.30 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-OCT-1998 163,132.16 163,132.16 200.000000 PDC ----------- 2,657.86 2,657.86 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -160,470.10 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-OCT-1998 160,470.10 160,470.10 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.0001 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-OCT-1998 -163,127.89 -163,127.89 100.000000 PD ----------- -2,657.79 -2,657.79 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -160,470.10 GNMA II POOL /0080023 01-OCT-1998 160,470.10 160,470.10 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-OCT-1998 160,470.10 0.00 100.000000 FC 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -291,167.14 GNMA II POOL 1080008M 01-OCT-1998 291,167.14 291,167.14 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -297,536.42 -297,536.42 100.000000 PD ----------- -6,369.28 -6,369.29 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERN OPER-PINCO Page 29 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1990 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 291,161.14 GNMA II POOL 1080068M O1-OCT-1998 -291,167.14 -291,167.14 100.000000 36225CC20 6.075% 06/20/2027 DD O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 297,536.42 297,536.42 100.000000 PDC ----------- 6,369.28 6,369.28 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -291,161.32 GNMA II POOL 1080088M O1-OCT-1990 291,161.32 291,161.32 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -297,530.47 -297,530.47 100.000000 PD ----------- -6,369.25 -6,369.15 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 291,161.32 GNMA II P00L 1080086M O1-OCT-1998 -291,161.32 -291,161.32 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-OCT-1998 297,530.47 297,530.47 100.000000 PDC ----------- 6,369.15 6,369.15 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -291,161.32 GNMA II POOL 1080086M O1-OCT-1998 291,161.32 291,161.32 100.000000 36225CC20 6.075% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -297,530.47 -297,530.47 100.000000 PD ----------- -6,369.15 -6,369.15 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -291,161.32 GNMA II POOL 1080088M O1-OCT-1999 291,161.32 291,161.32 100.000000 36225CC20 6.8751 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1990 291,161.32 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -263,544.75 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 25-OCT-1998 263,544.75 263,544.75 100.000000 78442GBA3 FLTG AT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 25-OCT-1998 -263,544.75 -263,544.75 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -263,544.75 STUDENT IN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 25-OCT-1998 263,544.75 263,544.75 100.000000 78442GBA3 FLTG AT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 25-OCT-1990 263,544.75 0.00 100.000000 PC 27-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,900,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC 23-OCT-1998 2,872,544.25 2,872,544.25 100.000000 3133131,63 NAT 10/23/1990 23-OCT-1998 -2,872,544.25 -2,872,544.25 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 23-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 30 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 16-OCT-1998 2,371,454.67 2,371,454.67 100.000000 313385K70 MAT 10/16/199B 16-OCT-1998 -2,371,454.67 -2,371,454.67 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BK CONS DISC 19-OCT-1998 295,913.42 295,913.42 100.000000 313385L20 MAT 10/19/1998 19-OCT-1998 -295,913.42 -295,913.42 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -193,132.46 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 19-OCT-1998 193,132.46 193,132.46 100.000000 21075NDKB 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 19-OCT-1998 -192,717.53 -192,717.53 100.000000 CAL ----------- 414.93 414.93 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -193,132.46 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 19-OCT-1998 193,132.46 193,132.46 300.000000 21075NDKO 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 19-OCT-1998 193,132.46 0.00 100.000000 FC 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST V.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 183,011.13 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-OCT-1998 10,997.52 10,987.52 0.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-OCT-1998 10,997.52 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 21-OCT-1998 19,470.80 19,470.80 0.000000 171200EBO FLTG RT O8/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 15-OCT-1990 19,470.80 0.00 0.000000 IT 21-OCT-1998 D.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 193,132.46 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 15-OCT-1998 549.73 549.73 0.000000 21075NDKO 6.190% 10/15/2012 DO 11/23/96 01-OCT-1996 549.73 0.00 0.000006 IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 31 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -193,132.46 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 15-OCT-1998 -549.73 -549.73 0.000000 21075WDKB 6.19D4 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-OCT-1998 -549.73 0.00 0.000000 ITC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 15-OCT-1998 996.24 996.24 0.000000 21075NDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-OCT-1998 996.24 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.00D000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 750,619.85 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 15-OCT-1998 96,774.89 96,774.89 0.000000 312ODD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-OCT-1998 96,774.89 0.00 D.000000 IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 117,421.65 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-OCT-1998 23,388.14 23,388.14 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324E 00/15/2032 DI-SEP-1998 23,388.14 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF III A6 26-OCT-1998 20,833.33 10,833.33 0.000000 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 25-OCT-1998 10,833.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,183.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-OCT-1998 6,204.61 6,204.61 0.000000 3133TO2D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-OCT-1998 6,204.61 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 23-OCT-1998 27,455.75 27,455.75 0.000000 3133131,63 MAT 10/23/1998 23-OCT-1998 27,455.75 0.00 0.000000 IT 23-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 16-OCT-1998 28,545.33 28,545.33 0.000000 313385K70 MAT 10/16/1996 16-OCT-1998 20,545.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 32 OCSGOOOIDO MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 19-OCT-1998 4,086.58 4,086.58 0.000000 3133851,20 MAT 10/19/1998 19-OCT-1998 4,066.58 0.00 0.000000 IT 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,628.62 FNMA POOL #0065581 26-OCT-1998 2,388.40 2,388.40 0.000000 31362M2N7 6.3918 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-OCT-1998 2,388.40 0.00 0.000000 IT 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 28-OCT-1998 106,533.33 106,533.33 0.000000 31364BWF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 20-AUG-1998 106,533.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 19-OCT-1998 265,000.00 265,000.00 0.000000 31364CBD9 6.625% 04/18/2001 DO 04/19/96 18-OCT-1998 265,000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 19-OCT-1998 0.00 O.OD 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,395.63 FNMA POOL #0239575 26-OCT-1998 2,102.62 2,102.62 0.000000 3137006LO 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-OCT-1998 2,102.62 0.00 0.000000 IT 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 14,064.62 PUMA POOL #0313371 26-OCT-1999 4,693.64 4,693.64 0.000000 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-OCT-1998 4,693.64 0.00 0.000000 IT 26-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,961.56 FNMA POOL #0313600 26-OCT-1998 4,552.08 4,552.08 0.000000 31374GKM8 6.143% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 4,552.08 D.00 0.000000 IT 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 3,569.34 FNMA POOL 40313769 26-OCT-1998 1,101.35 1,101.35 0.000000 31374GOWO 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-OCT-1998 1,101.35 0.00 0.000000 Page 33 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1990 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ IT 26-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,091.77 FNMA POOL 00313783 27-OCT-1998 4,110.01 4,110.01 0.000000 31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-OCT-1998 4,110.01 0.00 0.000000 IT 27-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13,793.71 FNMA POOL #0339016 26-OCT-1998 3,213.61 3,223.61 0.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-OCT-1998 3,213.61 0.00 0.000000 IT 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,755.49 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-OCT-1998 1,618.84 1,618.84 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-OCT-1998 1,618.84 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CA MTN TR 4 00177 30-SEP-1998 -94,785.00 -94,785.00 0.000000 345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 30-SEP-1998 -94,785.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 30-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CA MTN TR 4 00177 30-SEP-1998 95,564.05 95,564.05 0.000000 345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 30-SEP-1998 95,564.05 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 92,078.24 GNMA II POOL 10008684 20-OCT-1998 9,013.48 9,013.48 0.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 01-OCT-1998 9,013.48 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 160,470.10 GNMA II POOL 00080023 20-OCT-1998 16,147.65 16,147.65 0.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-OCT-1999 16,147.65 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 291,161.32 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 20-OCT-1998 23,226.30 23,216.30 0.000000 Pago 34 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 36225CC20 6.875► 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-OCT-1998 23,216.30 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 01-OCT-1998 129,375.00 229,375.00 0.000000 37042RK04 8.625% 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 01-OCT-1998 129,375.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 01-OCT-1998 33,500.00 33,500.00 0.000000 37042NGK1 6.700% 04/30/2001 DO 04/25/96 01-OCT-1998 33,500.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT 28-OCT-1998 45,520.83 45,520.83 0.000000 423328AZ6 FLTG AT 04/27/1999 DO 04/27/94 27-OCT-1998 45,520.83 0.00 0.000000 IT 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 01-OCT-1998 79,687.50 79,687.50 0.000000 59018SXP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 01-OCT-1998 79,687.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MTN 07-OCT-1998 175,500.00 175,500.00 O.000D00 63858JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 07-OCT-1998 175,500.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 07-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 27-OCT-1998 98,669.32 98,669.32 0.000000 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 25-OCT-1998 98,669.32 0.00 0.000000 IT 27-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 01-OCT-1998 12,600.00 12,600.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JUL-1998 12,600.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 35 -- _ OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT O1-OCT-1998 -12,600.00 -22,600.00 0.000000 9128212M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JUL-1990 -12,600.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT O1-OCT-1998 12,600.00 12,600.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 01-OCT-1998 12,600.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST O1-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 OCTOBER 1998 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,723.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT O1-OCT-1998 7,723.00 7,723.00 0.000000 9129273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 7,723.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,723.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT O1-OCT-1998 -7,723.00 -7,723.00 0.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -7,723.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC O1-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT O1-OCT-1998 7,723.00 7,723.00 0.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 01-OCT-1998 7,723.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST O1-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 OCTOBER 1998 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 8,163.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-OCT-1998 8,163.00 8,163.00 0.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 8,163.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-OCT-1998 0.00 O.OD 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM PUS INT ADJ 30-OCT-1998 -10,924.91 -10,824.91 0.000000 990000PJ9 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 30-OCT-1998 -10,824.91 0.00 0.000000 CN AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-OCT-1998 685.B8 685.88 0.000000 996085247 01-OCT-1998 685.88 0.00 0.000000 IT O1-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 36 s r OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGHT 01-OCT-1998 8,334.21 8,334.21 0.000000 996085247 01-OCT-1998 8,334.21 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 37 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MewngUMe Toed moo-. 11/le/99 AGENDA REPORT IMmNumber Item Number Orange County Sanitation FROM: David LuDistrict ctor of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement for the Groundwater Replenishment System, dated November 5, 1998 SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District (OCWD), joint sponsors of the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS), have prepared the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (DEIR/EIS)for public review in accordance with State of California and Federal laws. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION On December 15, 1997 a Notice of Preparation for the DEIR/EIS was issued, and scoping sessions were held in January 1998. The DEIR/EIS addresses comments received from the public and government agencies during the scoping process. An informational open house will be held on December 1, 1998 at OCWD from 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. A formal Public Hearing will be held before the Joint OCSD/OCWD GWRS Committee on December 8, 1998 at 6:00 p.m. Certification of the DEIR/EIS will be considered at the March, 1999 regular Board Meeting. ALTERNATIVES Not applicable G\nlpladeMpenda p,aX FeNneVum.1.11 tlB9&eMM6Lle dx fiev,aed d 8 Page 1 CEQA FINDINGS Pending ATTACHMENTS None. G Mp bNNyerga paX Re W r6 W nl Boarp1111 B[V rRrv[dXb px RMu^ Xaa�X Page 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District, to be held on P'I/!/1*4ee 199t was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on �/"� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this��day of �/Ulti-ri �c, Penny M. Ky[4/Secretapfj Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District HA W R DTA\ADMIMBS\FORMSTVA