HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-11-18 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
November 12, 1998
phone:
17141982-2411
ma81ng.4eres.: NOTICE OF MEETING
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valle,CA
9272B.8127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
street i .
1
O844 EIIIa . ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
Fo An.cAuntain VaWney Cl+
92708-7018 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1998 - 6:30 P.M.
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
Msmbtr 108" Ellis Avenue
A...tits Fountain Valley, California 92708
•
cities The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County
Ao.h.. Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date.
Brea
Buena Park
Cypress
Fountain ✓alley
Full.rton
Gereen Grove
Huntington Bosch
Irvine
L.Hebr.
Ls Pelmo .fit/wi t
Los Alamim.
Newp.rt Basch Bb rd Secretiry
Orange
Plaoantla
Sante A's
Seal Beach
Boonton Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings
uaun
U Perk
lbrbs;a Linea
c...tv or Drones
STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 18, 1998 at 3:00 p.m.
Sanitary Districts
Costa Mass SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
Mleway City BOARD OF DIRECTORS (TENTATIVE) - Saturday, November 21, 1998 at 9:00 a.m.
Water Districts PLANNING, DESIGN AND
Irvine Rnnr li CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, December 3, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 9, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
STEERING COMMITTEE/AD HOC
COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, December 16, 1998 at 5:00 p.m.
o um.,.., Puhtc Heav an,l m.Envronment nnr.ugh Excellence in Wastewater Systems'
BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Board Meeting
November November18, 1998
December December16, 1998
January January 27, 1999
February February 24, 1999
March March 24, 1999
April April 28, 1999
May May 26, 1999
June June 23, 1999
July July 28, 1999
August August 25, 1999
September September 22, 1999
October October 27, 1999
November November17. 1999
December December 15, 1999
AGENDA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 18, 1998—6:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has
been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion
and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there
is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the
posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to
the meeting date.
1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to
appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro lem, if necessary
5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters
of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be
deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot
have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b).
11/18/98
Page 2 oft
6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous
matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no
action by the Directors.
a. Report of Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and
awards
b. Report of General Manager
c. Report of General Counsel
7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on September 23,
1998 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.
8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:
10/15/98 10/31/98
Totals $4,205,168.51 $3,608,042.68
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a
Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions,
and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed
from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition
by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the Rem to be removed from the
Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
11/18/98
Page 3 of 5
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
9. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re November 18, 1998 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information
only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
October 28, 1998 to be filed.
10. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re
November 4, 1998 meeting.
b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (information only): The Chair will order the draft
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held
on November 4, 1998 to be filed.
C. Authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley,
providing for the City to use District's diesel and unleaded fueling station at Plant 1 at cost
plus 5% administration fees, in a form approved by General Counsel.
d. Authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation
providing for payment for the operation of the CNG Refueling Station at a cost of$0.10
per gallon for all sales, and maintenance costs of$900 per month plus parts, for one year,
in a forth approved by General Counsel.
e. (1)Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Global Security
Complex for an option to purchase a 640-acre site in Kem County for an amount not to
exceed $62,400, in a form approved by General Counsel; and (2)Authorize the General
Manager to initiate and conduct due diligence research of said 640-acre site for use as a
biosolids composting facility and for composting of other related feedstock including
manure, green waste, food wastes and other agriculture residues in an amount not to
exceed$100,000.
11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re
November 5, 1998 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO
ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design,
and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 5, 1998 to be
filed.
C. Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser&
McKee, Inc. for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-3, providing for
additional planning and design services in the amount of$293,022, increasing the total
amount not exceed $1,403,740.
11/18/98
Page 4 of 5.
11. d. Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camilo Engineers
for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, providing for additional programming
services and testing, for an additional amount of$62,993, increasing the total amount not
to exceed$7,119,469.
12. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1998.
13. Receive and file Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and Tier 1 Environmental Impact
Statement for the Groundwater Replenishment System, dated November 5, 1998.
14. Election of Chair
a. Consideration of nominations
15. Election of Vice Chair
a. Consideration of nominations
16.
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed
session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential
litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8,
54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public
Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are
not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any
of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
a. Convene in closed session, K necessary
1. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited
Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(C).
2. Confer with General Counsel re pending matter of litigation for Robert Burge, at al.
v. Sanitation District of Orange County, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 800278 (Government Code Section 54956.9).
3. Confer with General Counsel re pending matter of litigation for Wal-Con
Construction Co. v. County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, Orange
County Superior Court Case No. 782457 (Government Code Section 54956.9).
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
11/18/98
Page 5 of 5
17. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report
19, Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
20. Adjournment
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of
Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the dose of business 14 days
preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by
Directors, the General Managerand General Counsel and all formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
(714) 962-2411, ext. 7130
%VadonWatet%wp.dlelagendMi998 Joint Board AgerdesU 7 7998.doc
ROLL CALL
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
MEETING DATE: 11/18/98 TIME: 6:30 D.m.
(HOLMBERG) ........ ANDERSON ....................y/ ✓
(FLORY) ............... BANKHEAD .................... —
(BOYD) ................ BROWN .........................�/ ,✓ —
(COOK) ................ COLLINS ........................� —
(NOYES)............... DESAY........................... —
(FRESCHI) ............ DENES............................ y/(DOTSON) ............ DONAHUE......................�/ —
(PARKER) ............. DUNLAP.........................y/
(UNDERHILL)......... ECKENRODE...................�
(PERRY) ............... FERRYMAN ....................�
(WISNER) ............. GULLIXSON.................... 6✓ av _
(BROADWATER).... LEYES............................JL
(MAULLER)........... MARSHALL ....................
(LUTZ) ................. MC GUIGAN ...................JL _.Z—
(WALKER) ............ MINER-BRADFORD........... �
(COONTZ) ............ MURPHY........................i/ —
(KEENAN)............. PIERCY ..........................
y/ —
(EVANS)............... RICE.............................. o� a —
(POTTS) ............... SALTARELLI ................... /, _—
(HAMMOND)......... SHEA.............................__Jz
(SPITZER)............. STEINER.........................
� —
(HARMAN) ........... SULLIVAN......................� —
(MILLER) .............. SWAN ...........................
J� —
(BATES) ............... SYLVIA..........................
� —
(DALY)................. ZEMEL..... ................ ... Q"/ a/ —
STAFF:
Anderson
Ghirellip
Hodges
Kyle �dP
Ludwin ✓
McIntyre pact
Miles
Ooten
Peterman
Streed
Tuchman
OTHERS:
Woodruff
Andrus
H:Mp.ft ln=%DIRECTORWIna]ma Rao COILA
SIGN-IN SHEET
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
leaseprint) leaseprint)
��t_�-'✓ _grin C 'v/i[PCi� it c /2
i
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
BOARD MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 18,1998
1 . BECAUSE OF CHRISTMAS THE DECEMBER BOARD
MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THE THIRD WEDNESDAY,
DECEMBER 16T", ONE WEEK EARLIER THAN USUAL.
2. ON DECEMBER 15T, THERE WILL BE A GROUNDWATER
REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (OTHERWISE KNOWN AS
THE GWR) OPEN HOUSE AT THE ORANGE COUNTY
WATER DISTRICT BETWEEN 2 AND 7 P.M., AND ON
DECEMBER 8T" AT 5:30 P.M., THE PUBLIC HEARING ON
THE GWR PROJECT WILL ALSO BE HELD AT THE
WATER DISTRICT. YOU ARE INVITED TO ATTEND
THESE EVENTS.
IF YOU WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION ON EITHER
OF THESE EVENTS, CONTACT MICHELLE TUCHMAN.
3. IT WAS MY PLEASURE TO REPRESENT THIS BOARD AT
THE DEDICATION OF THE COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS
STATION ON OCTOBER 30TH, AND I WANT TO THANK
i
THOSE DIRECTORS WHO ATTENDED. THE TURN OUT
WAS MOST IMPRESSIVE AND STAFF DID AN
EXCELLENT JOB PREPARING FOR THIS OCCASION.
2
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
r
Penny KYle (2 copies no label)
Board Secretary
November 12, 1998
phone:
(714)962-2411 To the Chair and Members
of the Board of Directors
:nailing address:
P.O. Ball 8127 Fountain Valley, Subject: Board Letter
92728-012727
street addrew:
10844 Ellis Avenue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
Fountain valley,ca information on any of the items, please call me.
92708-7018
Computer Loan Program
Mnmher We began the Computer Loan Program in the summer of 1997 and it has been a
Ag=.tits great success. To date, we have had 115 employees apply for loans and buy
• computers. As of October 20, 1998, we have loaned $250,000, have collected
cities $143,017 in payments and have$106,983 available for future loans. Requests from
Anahalm employees are less frequent, but we are still receiving them. The Human Resources
area Department has heard numerous comments of appreciation for the program from
Buono Perk employees.
Lypre
Fountain Mley
Fullerton
Garden craw Directors Workshop
Huntington Beech
rrwra A Directors' Workshop has been tentative) scheduled for Saturday, November 21, to
La Habra P Y ti
Le Pelme discuss the proposed change to apay-for-pertormance compensation system. The
Los Alamitos Steering Committee has scheduled a special 3 p.m. meeting on November 18 to
Newpwtorangge discuss this subject, and the results of that meeting will determine whether to hold the
Plecentia Saturday workshop. An announcement will be made at the November 18 Regular
Santa Me Board Meeting and notification by fax will be sent to all Directors on the status of this
sear Basch Stantonvery important issue.
k
Ylle Park
ar Perk
vorbe Linda Fleet Reduction
Council of Drosso
Staff has recently re-evaluated our Fleet needs. As a result of that evaluation, staff
saniurr, Districts was able to eliminate 40 vehicles with high mileage or that were otherwise obsolete.
These vehicles will be sent to auction. The monies raised as a result will be placed
cache Mo. back into the General Fund. Very few, if any, of these vehicles will be replaced, and
Midway city those that will be replaced will be replaced with Alternative Fuel Vehicles (either
Water Districts electric or CNG). Over the past 5 years, staff has eliminated almost one half of the
Inane Ranch Fleet through this program.
Y2K Update
An excerpt from an article on Y2K: "AT&T chairman and CEO Michael Armstrong,
who is heading the industry-government Network Reliability and Interoperability
Council working on Y2K issues, called the task before the communications industry
'To Protect the Pubhc Health and the Environment through Excellence 11 Marewater Systems'
r l -
Board of Directors
Page 2
November 12, 1998
'daunting'. Domestic and international providers need to make sure their networks will
inter-operate smoothly as the date rolls over to Jan. 1, 2000. That means doing
60,000 years'worth of testing on systems and equipment in 443 days, Armstrong
said."
The following Statement For The Record by Lacy Suiter, Executive Associate Director
of the Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency
was made before the United States Senate Special Committee on the Y2K
Technology Problem on October 2, 1998:
The Council is scheduled to release a report later this year that narrows down
the risks and describes a plausible worst-case scenario. John Koskinen,
Chairman of the President's Council on Y2K Conversion, attended our August
meeting of the primary Federal Response Plan agencies, and stated that,
domestically, he is most concerned about small- and medium-sized
organizations (public and private); and over-reaction by the public. He believes
that the basic infrastructure will work and that there will be no major
nationwide catastrophic disruptions, but that there may be needs for Federal
response in some service sectors and in some geographic areas.
Too Clean for the Fish?
District's staff is known for the saying, 'The bluer the water, the fewer the fish." Now,
one of the District's consultants, Alan Meams, has co-authored an article, Too Clean
for the Fish?, which appeared in a recent addition of the Seattle Times. The article
discusses the link between nutrient and organic inputs to local waters and how they
impact fish abundance. Dr. Meams notes that while many coastal waterbodies have
gotten cleaner, there has also been a marked decrease in the number of fish. He and
his colleagues propose a more holistic approach to environmental and species
management. The article ends with a suggested five-point strategy to lake a broader
look at the Puget Sound ecosystem. A copy of the article is included in the
attachments.
Odor Complaints
Between October 20 and 29, five odor complaints were received. Four were the
result of plant operation and the fifth was most likely from a city storm drain.
Operations staff made corrections as necessary to solve the problems.
Board of Directors
Page 3
November 12, 1998
Test Method Modification Approved by EPA
In June 1998, the District began conducting acute toxicity testing under the auspices
of the new ocean discharge permit. In this test, live animals are placed in a control
tank containing effluent to determine whether the effluent is toxic to aquatic life. The
test—referred to as an acute toxicity test_uses a younger, more sensitive, life stage
of the fathead minnow(fish) than was mandated in the District' previous permit. The
first fathead minnow acute toxicity test conducted did not meet the permit-required
30-day average toxicity value. With additional testing, the 30-day value was met, but
the test results were still abnormally high, nearing non-compliance values.
Staff suspected that artificially high levels of ammonia in the test tank caused the high
test values. Ammonia is a component of the effluent and occurs in a balance
between the ionized (non-toxic) and the un-ionized (toxic)forms. The balance
between the two is controlled by a number of factors, including pH and temperature.
Due to the test temperature (prescribed by EPA) and length of the test (96-hours), pH
tends to drift up over the duration of the test. As pH rises, the amount of the toxic
forth of ammonia in the test solution also rises, creating artificial ammonia toxicity.
Artificial ammonia toxicity can be controlled by adjusting the pH of the test solution,
but any changes to test procedures must be first be approved by EPA. Staff
completed a study that verified artificial ammonia toxicity and forwarded to EPA a
recommendation for pH adjustment in the acute toxicity test. In October 1998, the
District was granted the requested pH control for conducting all acute toxicity tests
using the fathead minnow. The rapid response of the District's Ocean Monitoring
Program staff assured continued compliance with our ocean discharge permit and
EPA's approval of the modified test method speaks highly of staffs technical
expertise.
Review of July 21 Newport Beach Spill
On July 21 of this year, a contractor drilled into one of the District's force mains in
Newport Beach. Approximately 120,000 gallons of raw sewage were spilled: Of this,
20,000 gallons were contained and the remainder entered a storm drain and flowed
into Lido marina. District personnel assisted in the cleanup of spill and the Orange
County Health Care Agency closed the area for several days.
The Assistant General Manager directed staff to conduct a thorough "post mortem" on
the incident to determine what went wrong, why it happened, and lessons to be
learned. After interviewing District personnel involved in the events leading up to,
during, and after the spill, the inquiry focused on the District's Dig Alert program.
Board of Directors
Page 4
November 12, 1998
As an agency that owns and operates underground structures (e.g., sewer pipelines)
the District is required by State law to participate in the underground service alert
program—also known as the Dig Alert program. Contractors and others planning an
excavation project are required to notify the District of plans to dig underground and in
turn the District is required to alert contractors of the presence of a sewer line in the
vicinity of an excavation. The District is responsible for field marking the line if we
believe the line is at risk of being hit by the excavation.
In the Newport Beach situation a contractor for the Gas Company notified us through
a Dig Alert notice of their plans to relocate a gas pipeline. District staff did not
respond to the Dig Alert notice. Staff concluded the force main in the location of the
proposed excavation was not at risk bemuse it was buried 5-10 feet below the gas
line. What the contractor failed to tell us in the notice was they were planning to drill
extraction wells to dewater the excavation. The contract ruptured our force main in
the process of drilling one of those dewatering wells.
What did we learn from our review: First, our staff at all times followed the District's
existing Dig Alert procedures in screening out this notice and deciding not to respond.
Second, our existing Dig Alert procedures are not adequate to prevent situations like
this from occurring again. Staff screened out a notice that, in hindsight, we should
have responded to either by marking the line in the field or notifying the contractor of
the presence of the line in the vicinity of the excavation.
In response to the review of this incident, the Engineering Department is in the
process of analyzing and refining its Dig Alert policies and procedures to lake a more
preventive approach. Program improvements will be put in place to:
• enhance communication between office staff and field inspectors;
• provide better training and supervision of the program staff;
• establish more stringent screening criteria to determine when to field mark a
sewer line;
• make a positive, prompt response to all Dig Alert notices either by field
marking, notifying the excavator in writing if a line is nearby, or with a phone
call when no line is located in the area.
If we can prevent even one major spill with these new procedures it could save the
District tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in avoided labor costs, cleanup
costs, contractor claims, and administrative penalties.
The matter is presently under administrative review by the staff of the Regional Water
Quality Control Board. Board staff has told us that the District's involvement in the
events leading up to the spill is being looked at from a"strict liability" standpoint. It is
our understanding the matter will be considered by the RWQCB at its January 1999
Board meeting.
Board of Directors
Page 5
November 12, 1998
Articles of Interest
I have attached articles on subjects of importance or interest to the District that you
may not have seen.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Donald F. McIntyre tyre V
General Manager
DFM:jt
H\WP.WWOMI"WDFM1 MERSMi EROAR�l I I M.00O
Attachments
Tut: Shnrn.s.Taus COMMENTARY SUnwY,JULY 19, 1998 B 5
Llslde Cpinlons
8,,llIl//aB,II IJ'u,
anon:Pe c e B)
gowmdsb:Yecc 85,6
MANAGING 1NE NAIERVYAYS RW,
70
Too clean
forfish .? a. .
the Sam elsotlleYe gelmm head thraudh A,Holland asan l}eir nay m"
Lade IPo.sh...ho in jury 19IP.The U parfinemoJFisberler runs la open the
ldelurliahiaW On,ofInget 358 W amved Below J1.1j6,d),have berm
wren of the hichsin Are post)yeerre,
♦PUGET SOUND I,appraachinggh it...,,highthhfq bud less-abundanl/ish communiry.
Scientist,who in the past suggested that same apartment o(nmDiext and organic input might be
be.. vial to line SPmm,ar at least not harnlJml,noire disrounded by the media,regndmosy
agencies and publicnadoocarygromps. bit time to take another look at the relationship
between organic matter and fish habitat?
rd '.uWa.....I.,rn.vr........e . bused,he lYumlWns W father ait.'ITayim Sa d I l'
here war orinaboSing ad Seri I I
e.l String' 1 L1 when.are M1 froloo, i 111I LJ M1 their feral mend. ay
fishr Il J - ry What we din Y buteugut 1,—isielyet they hand ..
Y.m M d ali 8 - daorta" NL I tingly II f the hound rush W C
lov S al I look I ShellfishV. J by consuming- each year? i
,uses between har,cuuM Palle - Wlr M1 q- W d Il 1 Y>l 1 -
y bl antl elwa hang.. I hT Iho U-stie n.r(they arv,the So—a use being
� �
Nan',Ilaryr:neJ.But it Iwks liY.we're gelling cbx. east,a aJr4m L%krwn Sau J,rnfish"vwrlraJalion. �1
SauM War Qualn,gety.Tend a report IN Netwere. What Awl n vMgv. LI your -Jv nN North
Lhifle ,amnia to an were. Hv( Q cI iiac - gLa.Y andlwLhlwevm _ r�'
tweed uvJ�11 I Itw rrl relate uld R R 1. td�-ts d Ma N 16 'was ar q Iul - 'rS u Wen III, 1 1 r
N ham PWIY Wm 1 Ina big—his h - W ur—n e J ( {a..� t v3•
arrWly I+nI AM1 I, I,.I lln—
file,M1 e h W Mc A Niger Su E lv h result an e' S
F continued ceneereants.dedgung, hine and LoMen WII klun—,he W.,,barleyWLI Afil. ryrf ta'd1 M Y.' Y
thwterwi firepublic INA we ba We beli to fish. MII(sh nutM1 I he i,.eShift hasafferted x4 a1h+ p.� ;P��eyyww
t afluttan andN return Is fewer fish,nar trount, IM1e entire PardicC - I where p1jukhe-M( M1 W -
it.I'd MUbe 51 1 8 U . by wl dby N M1 Lu ,S IIYI J g M1 I Y ra y rJL F"-ape h bl Y l Is d g M Presentably,this- 11a rase bIu. Sn J llr ii
rni program Such a poiseen wAlp g I Jifa.f.ACS .
J the publue new 111treatersfor g d In ur knowledge there preas.in place in
IUSIL un,un.utly.RISC US entire orthsturV 1 tr omlure laughter and 11.11 fed Nit Mmnd VY
J 11-, du sears mumsand M1 l ar re dun rrlh llul Is 11x N. d Nellie 1Mur 1 sa d mr Ln+l
ax
v x L P Aih IIY -h bI1Y.due -rt.r N
1
lbrvduv.a r'nmYrl.m',gre—h—WitLUYa.I P 1 Alak 1 Wfina hnand nil J.
.rynhhr¢IIal nllld aUwl,l-fish red lust PdluWne
T' ....
Il NNUa m ng:WCle,,We..su Ass Awre Ly,Llighl.d
"n the rccau,ampler by Muss Anrhrbw("Novae.ul Did ire-In,Armin,the bah?
I liSeUr "Ju1Y 11 and 15.) '1 he re relmim brt—n clan valet aIW Jmlininp
m `
Fansiom esam w Ple Prereed yW.Nmraemenl of manna fish implwa tNl Vast Lrllu,im may has been a p.rJ :Y a b Y Vpirrg r.aWuht fiat and at leastwr hat,ahuWuxv.11ow rW yuu caVlaix
h:e.p....., oll..r...nu'.Y nJ..... a nnu l m Jix'bn sjllI HII rvun aq�wM1en w.xv.
-ow..it pull-all wa11a1 ma live rvJu ullulu ul piny hundreds J Inma a-m%anir lmlmiW
exyun4 merit m be Wood.wan IRwfixo, ed-W sWn uWv'
IN unxnnl M".Isla se:AN,wresariePW,nsol IImmb It, IYSb at,1!NQIs,wMn Said,EmnAt
vrJnn W thew'pav4ilities taut,led lu. and'I . .obila avers,daily lekn un mN lg Wrc4ul
4/Ienrhel f.W:illa! waste.man w lLe Sound.IxxlutW lneu in were real Na
Wanly W Ith-end,wlo•lose.ncFfiah at,1.ral 1.
We are all familiar with Herschel and leis gang of 11 nA du ml eA Ire,sama,taller d..I,.but It it..
Cablwn user burn wlwmlhQ♦d a1¢INudaW sake me Ater wmma.[lama and erualr[canY IN,thrus t
Nc1iallwiwb*'IN HeruMli wcrtsentu l'Nritla eel
lain their friend,Are still co wing large numbers W Salmi as
mmN cei i.somil .To M
fah along the cwu.H.I.WI i1 so Wume certain.makers fish in the Huwami h Waterway and
Doing the ped Owner eunlury.the Sound has Wen Akl walled but Armti'ancre plagued with fin or am
.Aber Oaearu caused or the w,la.
hint fist were idinalki even flare.le
:.asatlne the his a.Al,high b.h
Monitoring the Sound ,xWm mayWJ,w ...I.x .tlw rare..a.,...
.II.,.A•lW polot sjdwyN yrvuJ Ae.k.x eu w eel lmu .I..F.emul MNJLx bUle..A IN,seed to .t,,
..JMN.N• ndiai NNu-WdJWn An"..Aws,A the S.mW laud lots.al nmgtbrJJe
.mlWpYrnwnwWaw mdlukwa/W.Ilan err eweryrM A-ore, Puhlia onW, has huen .e.....nto lisk.the mcca�impliu Nts is than White wdllllrub um tlul we dant wane billions in public money w lalSe
r..µmluoPuge Pl damossnW ALl Suxxd 'Li.wAWi and Lnior NorvalW wdw-Ic4ne the turn W IN century-traYLc.lust capecta14ms or cwnleapwiterse mnugemenl anwna.
As la h 1 YW M Illfwer fish or lM Sound-at 11wre willM ba - l-twom to Wmil lot
2xrm Ins!that organic d San,loan jeet,nours,FoJi slash as Arle.dmmdll rmLfish also read. wine of our priessidgerical Artesia may fam Men won.
Ism IM1e R (called J Went we Imareating during the Alb and NIA,An excess terproduct m so a numberW Aniffe.man Ahuub fell.
us)IN used ft Nan ilwons e dl.lr J t J h F be.poll still will net1 YYrais or .If she•\l I Ilnte alormarn -uenad arLdind.1 As Mil yhe theI situation what e now reader is chall M d by the 4lNt' exactly
1\
1M fl 11 J .tied
n J M1 'Ib 14 disease,Sort kas ow went hallvY do).As I Anapp yn (1 'YWY IA Nlg delsn The MYd Sausnal Wine,Quetta,M' T
eam w Un J I 1d I JI hit,, S I UW of fish WIII isle the vat t geo('m suarow d¢uvary. er dew
C�•. I,,,has.M I lwr IY III tidal 100,041leant duringd urfa IesuraQemem auqunvWabraader LM retu.
Awh advdnr.-a in wastewater lican
ep gul•n,t Wie1Itl NN a Ix MJ Na M lu d p IM4
OZ 9I m.1did IN the W 4 rS W Maybe,twl a I µ' t I
or A
e \ I Lanu�u floor l I means l l I ° 'n' i 1 1 lamp ti XI Iwt oil l nut authors
IN,mJyp M M oiled broader II 6i Sound.The
U• ` UXn tI - fit h u E0td - K. M1g van AI MvnI main
( Y g 1' Ih1 pin II.A. 'I spills,red tides,
�,d I M M J W -I sl J J I V I 1 u Ih 1M1 . \ r Y Lsl
LS j)1 (Eder M And Fu AI L 1 1 na-rud m 11 Moist
wJ 1 G 1 Ice Agencies ci L':I F I ew w N W dN
1 J IJLf Ih J FI 1 14.IJIN ud L ly what DI : 1 IDeanc
. Iryilphh J y h-IIIM1 II IIY IIIWI b Iw, said A ophtl
-h ill IIIM' II µR
I I M ml II pf Ily INF+I J Ad leads..Scaulle.
xelsld ss MSouM lIwe caNer. Iax1X f IIIX / 1 AI -on LW or
rWas, MAW I,'bar l I And W 1 '1 WHIN Ill " gh PuN (Sound mural gt 1 we mmai
uJl„�C/.� t d • !.i Wend Yr nil I liIg I en J ati , yt pp h IMtom NOW-t ill wwuiW Us.
JA -Y 1 with qllli I gwllYI - N IN10 l { Yli
[ An
y I. {••�•• Wanl p I.A.I h but A Ja WIev1 PWn W 6F n N : Il osir;LxNh
\1, I hi. 1991 book 1 M1 U 1 sea n e AM be Jc hnh 1 all la l or. Yass elm P W slmlds.
hnI xy I F Washington d b W W YM'ttexlMm N f surs
INemerimIla,larrud. �for Sister.EN-mos...WbIll
T• + hey a University dW M1' M Art with the199J National Research Council I d MCAccl 9e I• Na:
I ml h I II ll v t St gig Wastewaters to C urban plus
I.tln rd h M M d- Coastal maddieQ aPcde ..
rJ •• ul Iruwd aewaNe in IYM 1 I ke uFe+ A m,N fisMIYTM'a' gnphY Mna ho It, hwyt row'.W
&elan l bna J I W II Sound prostates U 4 N
,)/ Sound 1VILIb O4M1µMvpi Ed ntlw sIIIi ILWh' g, and 1N AJ.... -114 irallaa anatlu•d w11X..
lay A. K. ! Win, IM1 I • 1 M••1•srNMillaet•1g•F ,A x
y lira IWyI le Yq •IuuhY NMwlwe9 Iml phl - Weld l ` .".i
LWi hew bull P W I Sake,A '1get Ihel.xW.N ids N1 mido,-I and fat, ,c . a IS~Coal Jr.la a blow.
kam I and dl (JI Ian I rya h Id M IgI I W pe udustnal history bQlul wAttoQ pN
P,asmA tuWIY,N ,ury py nddoo y iladtr sMWea '
•% INN IN M1 lh t I M the H! 1 theirNM ltEgC and their y, with IN h brad D •age
Cdg ry WI it is, tat I At IN dA1 pb
IWbu . Wr an 1 11MceilaY IWu c In N I lem.1,'I ,trends artanneI Ade la his Start,that
As I throure INuk of l' Warshe
birds. te 1er Angola,fish Lundri,a.fishing 41.10.ud ipg0..
•L NM C 1 ewe W n A l narratoragriculture. 1 p 1 rumH Carl.. W 1\ F -I (.Ali goal I I Shia," events,' F Agt st 1 I ao g t I s helped 0 by ud tail mdels for menay
Iltw cti alms bM Jkl 1 d
ghA4d uaD NgwnmmW Ptgn Soared.
Signal A}l As Ihlin lW I I I Il M her1 Ise pi fpeW
.. f \i'lu` }I fI� Mdraw,Ae . 1M. M1 Ic., A W ImW ria—missy tlrpe s'awastIA orris nwrd•�' r 1/ \Pubpop w1J11 -' deco wide Ads....wan
4wfi Ix JI ass ntu wln All Jwr 611es,111 Qdwv�a.pry
A p I..A Inca list, l u e.A,est lltl l r vnaxe f.1. will µholly J ' leeauintns and ma.Nmel .,
u he I l whin p-0mxm was n b lutn-,nr Mrs.impmnlly.n will help I it w __ __•u. ate._,
V
_,San Diego Union-Tribune Archive Document Page 1 of 5
a
(Page B-1 )
Toilet-to-tap plan worries Salk researcher
Kathryn Balint
STAFF WRITER
18-Oct-1998 Sunday
Dave Schubert, a biochemist and Alzheimer's researcher at The Salk
Institute, has raised a new concern about San Diego's plans to turn sewage
into tap water.
He thinks tiny molecules of biotech and medical wastes -- substances whose
properties might not even be fully understood by scientists --might be
able to slip through the treatment process undetected.
"There are hundreds of thousands of these compounds that are put out by the
medical research community, biotech firms and hospitals," said Schubert,
who serves on Salk's safety committee and knows firsthand about the kinds
of wastes that can legally be put down the drain.
Neurotoxins and radioactive isotopes, for instance.
"The city doesn't have any way of measuring these easily," said Schubert.
San Diego proposes to purify sewage water and add it to Colorado River
water in the San Vicente Reservoir southeast of Poway. If the project is
approved next year by the San Diego City Council, the mix could begin
flowing from some San Diegans'faucets in four years.
Schubert said he would not be so worried about the project if the sewage
came only from households.
But much of it flows from northern parts of San Diego, including Sorrento
Valley and Torrey Pines, where biotech labs and medical facilities abound.
"My point is, you have to consider the source of this water," Schubert
said. 'There's not going to be an immediate effect on health, but the
long-term effect may be quite significant."
.../idoc.cgi7416375+unix+jtappan+ads.uniontrib.com..80+Union-Tribune+Union-Tribune+Librar 10/30/98
V
San Diego Union-Tribune Archive Document Page 2 of 5
w
San Diego officials, however, say that no matter what contaminants are in
the waste water to begin with, they will be removed during five intensive
treatment processes. They say their purified sewage water will be even
cleaner than the city's present tap water.
Paul Gagliardo, manager of the city's sewage purification project, calls
Schubert's concerns about biotech and medical wastes "a non-issue" and
"totally unwarranted in the grand scheme of things."
Even Salk Institute President Tom Pollard has endorsed the city's sewage
purification project.
Gagliardo says the amount of biotech and medical waste poured down the
drain is infinitesimal compared to the 24 million gallons of other wastes
flowing daily through the city's northern sewers.
"It's basically killed or removed in any of the treatment processes or
diluted to a significant degree," he said.
Schubert said he is impressed with how conscientious the city waste water
officials are. But he is not convinced that all the potentially harmful
contaminants can be removed.
His position has strong backing from an internationally recognized expert
on water quality.
Daniel Okun, a retired University of North Carolina environmental
engineering professor, has long objected to San Diego's plan to add 18
million gallons of purified sewage water daily to the San Vicente
Reservoir.
Only one other area in the United States adds purified sewage to a drinking
water reservoir: the Upper Occoquan Sewage Authority, which serves the
Alexandria, Va., area. That system, which has operated for 20 years, is
smaller than what the city of San Diego proposes.
Okun points out that new chemicals are being discovered all the time, and
that it will be difficult, if not impossible, to tell if they end up in San
Diego's drinking water.
"There are so many people out there looking for new chemicals, for
pharmaceuticals, pesticides and other uses," Okun said. "But there are very
few people who are looking for methods of measuring these chemicals in low
concentrations of water, and even fewer people looking at how to remove
these things from water."
While San Diego waste water officials reject Schubert's opinion, they have
listened carefully to his argument.
City Councilwoman Valerie Stallings arranged for Schubert to meet with them
.../idoc.cgi?416375+unix+jtappan+ads.uniontfib.com..80+Union-Tfibune+Union-Tfibune+Librar 10/30/98
aSan Diego Union-Tribune Archive Document Page 3 of 5
u
after he wrote to her. Schubert, who has been with Salk for 30 years, knows
Stallings from the days when she, too, worked at the private research
institute.
"If there is any merit to what Dave Schubert is saying, then we need to
know about it," said Stallings.
She said she is confident the water is safe, but added she has not made up
her mind whether the city should go ahead with the$154 million plan.
Stallings'confidence in the safety of the treatment system is echoed by
Perry McCarty, a Stanford University environmental engineer who directs the
Western Region Hazardous Substance Research Center. He headed a panel of
scientists that investigated San Diego's plan and deemed it safe.
McCarty acknowledges that there are a lot of unknowns in the city's sewers,
but says the purification process is designed to deal with them.
"It's a very thorough system of barrier after barrier to prevent this sort
of thing from getting into the water supply and affecting people," he said.
"I know of nothing that's so toxic that it would go through all of these
processes and would survive in a reservoir for a year."
Under their permits with San Diego, biotech and medical facilities are
legally allowed to put small amounts of certain potentially hazardous
substances into the sewer system.
Schubert said such wastes can be poured directly down the drain or can be
rinsed off beakers and other glassware used in research.
He also says there is a potential for less ethical companies to discharge
prohibited wastes.
City officials, however, say San Diego biotech and medical facilities do a
good job of adhering to regulations.
Even so, Schubert argues that the discharge guidelines were written many
years ago, before the advent of biotech industries, and that they were
primarily to deal with industrial wastes, such as heavy metals, pesticides
and other chemicals. He said the guidelines do not take biotech wastes into
account.
Schubert became concerned about San Diego's waste water recycling plans
when he noticed children playing in reclaimed irrigation water along Torrey
Pines Road a couple of months ago. He said there is no telling what medical
or biotech wastes may have escaped treatment and may have been present in
the reclaimed water.
Schubert sees the reclaimed irrigation water as a potential problem in the
short run.
.../idoc.cgi?416375+unix+jtappan+ads.uniontrib.com..80+Union-Tribune+Union-Tribune+Librar 10/30/98
San Diego Union-Tribune Archive Document Page 4 pf 5
0
"The public has not been informed that this is a potential health hazard,"
said Schubert, who wants the city to embark on a campaign warning people
that state guidelines recommend that people avoid contact with it.
Reclaimed water, which is used for irrigation only, is treated much less
than the waste water that would be used for drinking.
While Schubert focuses on biotech wastes that may enter the sewers, Okun,
the water quality expert from North Carolina, is following a new area of
potential concern: medications excreted into the sewage system by people
taking them.
Researchers have detected low doses of medications--everything from
birth-control hormones to drugs for heart ailments-- in drinking water in
Europe.
The effects on people who drink the water are unknown. But Okun said San
Diego is increasing the likelihood that such pharmaceutical compounds will
end up in its drinking water by using sewage as a water supply.
Okun also worries about the potential hazards of estrogenic chemicals,
another relatively recent discovery.
These chemicals, sometimes called endocrine disrupters, can alter hormonal
functions in animals by acting like estrogen. Numerous chemicals, including
those in pesticides and plastics, are suspected estrogen mimics. In waters
contaminated with such chemicals, male fish have taken on female
characteristics.
It is unknown how humans react to these chemicals, but some suggest they
may be responsible for worldwide reductions in male sperm counts.
From the city's viewpoint, neither pharmaceutical compounds or estrogens
are a concern.
"They're large molecules," said Gagliardo, the city s sewage purification
expert. "They're removed by the reverse osmosis treatment and they're
oxidized by the chemical processes."
Okun, however, goes by the principle that a city should always use its best
and purest source of water first. He says San Diego should focus on getting
water from farmers in the Imperial Valley and increasing use of reclaimed
water for irrigation.
By using sewage as its water source, Okun said, "people are going to be
obliged to take an added risk that is not necessary."
...fidoc.cgi7416375+unix+jtappan+ads.uniontrib.com..80+Union-Tribune+Union-Tribune+Librar 10/30/98
Fertility via sewers Page ] of 6
MARKE
technology HsrtotrnoetPage m AutAc esCEs § m
Txsnanxor couNry ruwnca. .
Fertility via sewers
AGRICULTURE: Treated sludge from Orange ..E :..
County's sewage supplies nutrients to TeoNnubyyFPoompuWo
marginal land in outlying counties. Aq riunofMeFU&
Edge of Natma
El N§b
October 25, 1998 Lhoft
oennPug.
Our Univars.
By PHIL GARLINGTON 5oayie.
The Orange County Register Thank
From Buttonwillow, Kern County
On an 80-acre cotton field near this town of 1,600, the
sludge semi passes slowly up and down the tilled
ground, a conveyor belt on the trailer's floor rolling a
black, pungent goo out the back and depositing it in
even lines.
:u
The delivery complete, the driver uses an air
compressor to blow away any lingering residue and
odor before he points his truck back toward Southern
California for another 25-ton load.
Within a few hours after the coal-black muck slides
onto the field, a tractor towing a disc turns it into the
soil.
"This pretty much controls the fly problem," says Bill
Tracy, a long-time cotton farther and a recent convert
to bio-solids, as he tilts back his straw Stetson. "It's
darker than steer manure, but organically it's the
same."
Bureaucrats like to refer to "bio-solids." At the
treatment plant this stuff is sometimes called "cake
sludge." On Tracy's field it looks like black
mayonnaise. You know what it smells like.
"It's kind of a musty odor," Tracy says,judiciously.
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/10/25/science/waste025 w.shtml 10/26/98
Fertility via sewers Page 2 of 6
"My wife notices if we use it on a field near the
house."
Any way you slice it, it's sewer waste, and every year
an estimated million tons of it from Southern
California toilets are spread on farmlands here in
Kern County, some 100,000 tons supplied by the
Orange County Sanitation District.
It has to go someplace. It's illegal to dump it in the
ocean. It's costly to put it in landfills. And plenty of
farmers want it.
The Orange County Sanitation District spends $4
million annually to hire specialized trucking
companies to haul sludge, 25 tons per load, to rural
areas in nearby counties, where some farmers use the
treated night soil as a nutrient-rich amendment to
bring marginal land into production.
But Kern County is having second thoughts. Some of
the politically powerful agricultural giants here,
including the row-crop vegetable growers who
produce 70 percent of the nation's fresh carrots,
would like to ban sewage sludge completely. They
don't want sewer waste anywhere near a carrot crop
worth $51 million annually.
Although sewage sludge is never allowed on fields
that grow human food, and although there is no
evidence sludge has caused heath risks, Kem County
carrot growers have become worried that pathogens
might migrate during floods, or that ground water
might become contaminated with heavy metals such
as cadmium or arsenic.
During floods last winter in eastern Kern, sludge
clumps were washed through the streets of the tiny
hamlet of Cantil, near Red Rock State Park.
"Our biggest problem would be any perception by the
public that there is any chance of any kind of E. coli
or salmonella organism being detected," said John
Guerard, agronomist with Bolthouse Farms, one of
the world's biggest carrot producers. "Our business
http://www.ocregister.conVarchives/1998/10/25/science/waste025w.shtml 10/26/98
Fertility via sewers Page 3 of 6
could be ruined overnight."
Even the public perception that food crops and sludge
are close to each other might cause damage to the
industry, says Mary Shell, a former Kern County
supervisor who is a consultant for vegetable growers
opposing sludge.
But no health hazards or water contamination from
the sludge have been detected so far, says Steve
McCalley, director of Kern County's department of
environmental health, although there have been
nuisance complaints because of odor.
McCalley says only 50,000 acres in the county have
been approved for sludge, and that there's now a
moratorium on new sites until county supervisors
approve a new sludge ordinance.
"The stuff can smell," McCalley says. "That's part of
the reason we're looking at this."
Until now, sludge has been spread on Kern County
farmland without much regulation. All a farmer
needed was a permit from the water quality control
district.
Tracy successfully uses sludge to revitalize what
otherwise would be low-yielding acres that he's
planting in cotton and animal feed grains. He says he
was skeptical at first but is now convinced the
practice poses no danger. "Responsible farmers are
good stewards," Tracy says. "We don't want a Love
Canal situation. Twenty-five years of research has
shown this isn't a problem. But the people on the
other side, if they can't argue science, they bring up
the bogeyman of perception."
Orange County officials are concerned about the
sludge dispute in Kern County but say a ban wouldn't
create a crisis. Mike Moore, the district's manager of
environmental compliance and monitoring, says other
counties remain willing to take sludge. But a ban in
Kern,which now takes the preponderance of Orange
County's sludge, would be inconvenient.
http://www.ocregister.conilarchives/i 998/10/25/sciencetwaste025w.shtml 10/26/98
Fertility via sewers Page 4 of 6
"I don't think a ban is going to happen, but we have
sites in Riverside and San Diego counties, so we do
have flexibility."
The main concern, Moore says, is about what would
happen if for some reason all outlying counties
decided to ban bio-solids. The district would have to
use expensive landfills, and ratepayers would see a
big hike in their bills.
Even if sludge deliveries aren't banned outright, the
rules are about to change. Kern County supervisors
are now mulling tough new regulations that would
include new fees for "generators" such as Orange
County to help defray the cost of maintaining Waal
roads that are being pounded by rumbling sludge
trucks.
"The roadbeds were made for the school bus and the
pickup truck," Tracy says, "not for big trucks carrying
tons of material."
The amount the district would pay for for its share of
mitigating road damage remains unresolved, Moore
says.
The OCSD's two treatment plants, which serve 2.2
million people, produce 190,000 wet tons of bio-
solids a year. During treatment, the solids are allowed
to settle out in ponds; then the resulting cake
undergoes "anaerobic digestion and de-watering." But
the sludge may still contain bacteria and viruses.
Moore said there are about 20 cities trucking sludge
to Kern, but Orange County, the city of Los Angeles
and Los Angeles County are the big players.
Currently, there are eight trucking companies, or
"applicators," bringing the black goo to Kern County.
Puna Gro Systems is the biggest, and the company
that brings the most from Orange County.
Pima Gro's Wilson Nolan, whose company is one of
three haulers based in Orange County, says hired
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/I 998/10/25/science/waste025w.shtml 10/26/98
Fertility via sewers Page 5 of 6
trucks pick up sludge from treatment plants in
Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach.
"We take out about 70,000 tons annually," he
explains. Two-thirds of that goes to Kem County.
"Regulation is an absolutely necessary thing," Nolan
says. "We are not resisting. We want that layer of
safety and certainly to avoid any risk to the public
health and to the environment."
Moore emphasizes that the bio-solids are not being
dumped in Kern: "The farmers are requesting bio-
solids. It's the best way to use this organic material."
Cotton farmer Tracy agrees. He says that in a global
economy the profit in cotton and cattle feed is so iffy
that it doesn't pay to plant marginal, alkaline land if
the farmer has to foot the bill for steer manure.
"But if(the soil amendment) is free, then bringing
these lands into production can be economical."
The amount of land brought under cultivation with
sludge almost equals the amount of farmland in the
county that has been lost to tract houses, Tracy says.
And when land is planted it goes on the county's tax
rolls.
Usually, the goo is turned into the ground within
hours, Tracy says. And within days, the farmer is
putting in a crop, either cotton or shallow-rooted
wheat used for animal feed.
Like other farmers, Tracy rotates the crops in his
fields, meaning that some land usually is available for
taking sludge.
"But farming is first," he says. "We take only the
amount of bio-solids we can use."
Guerard of Bolthouse Farts says only a half-dozen
growers in the county have an interest in using the
sludge. "A lot of the data is in dispute, but we don't
think it's worth the risk to a whole industry," he says.
http://www.ocregister.conVarchives/1998/10/25/sciencetwasteO25w.shtm] 10/26/98
Fertility via sewers Page 6 of 6
In any case, says Kern County supervisor Ken
Peterson, the days of laissez-faire sludge delivery are
over: "We're looking at health, we're looking at
roads."
The county is going to have the agricultural
commissioner document every parcel on which sludge
is used, so that the county can notify future buyers.
"I don't think we want to outright ban it, but we want
to direct the flow and make sure it's properly
recycled," Peterson said.
"There aren't going to be any (sludge) sand castles out
here."
/1 ngNgper In Omn/e Gunry,Glibmu
egis
Gpyri/ht 19ae The Oran/o County RoglNor
Fosse aentl comments to ocraolYer�l'nM haetlom com
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/10/25/sciencelwasteO25w.shtml 10/26/98
12 Independent cover Story Thursday,October 15, 1998
Millions of gallons of sewage seep into soil
■Much of the city's 600 miles
of underground sewer pipes are - J
Outdated and cracking. era �i• :C 'jt, 1
1(A1NlxeN HANn �t'T Huntington
Beach City
HUNiIN=N BEACH—Imagine 114 - Yazd
lom lodtied ga of raw sewage seal to - �. employee
the contents of 5.700 average swbmdng 1, s.Sar Jerry
Items
Ite —seeping into We snit heneath Me 3
ofy's streets. - .: plays a
Thus may be,a difhcdt scene to fathom fro F i model of a
for the typical resident Yet Mats how much broken
sewage
eoPs been last smm 1996 And itbase
At least 147000 gallons of Me ctys 1•I Y main.The
rile water Is lost rp� t I made of
every day In the +w t y
PLUMBING Downown area alone y. ;7 x'y day pipes,
PUGHR sews wdergmund _?�, are 40
se elpeWes that ; r years over
do ® are relM1 broken
or
w severely decked '>r IM1elr tlfe
because of old age, etPe<taLlcy'
lhbk Iast month, the !f g
a60YL City Council approved .11 all,
Vie spending$1 mWcas for .h FoRsH or
problems tem rewe e
emergency sewer th
facing Uae Downto n more man
dq¢ effort m head off Find-
In.,. 's �• q r
Y awLan] But Mal E fund
/ey
Lee your only a Wmd A d n
our alms on rs eueh-needed Sy Lm
Mallare
Hot
lneat Wb cot Medy$35N ..--
tend an e- miWon over Me nett These video printouts attest to Me damage the clay pipes have suffered after 80 to 86
din ail s0 years ve money LL
ea M1hfick n doesn't have a is bud- years of me m Me Downtown and old town areaz of Huntingdon Beach.
eanhlink.nel. get-wnstmined cal-
lers
But there's sal - -`'erne people believe Me system need- sewage gets everywhere,'he said. per day,he said.
Hong even more cis- Ed to be replaced because it was adtlated Pipelinx are aduffier senora concern. The sfmadon's seventy prompted Me
inching to city oBinas. Dinner said. Some of Me tltys main sewed problems he City Council a move to approve the$1 mJ-
'We're lasing a large amount of sewage, He said Me matter, now being mrsom- willdn Me Downtown area,where some of bon for emergency repims Downtown.
and we don't know where its going,-said gated by Me U.S.abomey's office,isalso Me Wes are Ed years and older.The typical Noble said many of Wove Wes will be
Don Noble,maintenance operator;!man- being appealed to Me stale RegWrtal Water We d a pipeline s 50 years,Noble antl. mended using a process called slip Wing,
ager for Me HunWglon Beach pubW works Oualty Control Board—Use same agency 'It's gotten to Me point where we are which Involves fiding another fine Inside
deparbnent. met Issued Me M.3 notion fine. stand to clean them;said Jerry OIks,a Me broken pipeline and se palling it to lit
City officials speculate Me waste water as, Noble said be wouldn't rule ant the Fee- crew leader for Me itys wastewater Me oriented,
being absorbed for the most pan by me siblity of sewage reaching We ocean off management Wvsion. 'They-0 fag apart Shp hal wWch carts much less Wan
dense soil sunmunding the pipeline. Huntington Beach OR us., replacing me en ire pipeline,adds another
However,leakage is just one of any prod- •g sewdge came up mmugh me man. Cracks,breaks and deposit buldups an 70 to 05 years to a We.
Iems facie Me city determinating ewer hdeandmenflowed Eomeocean—yez,l Me Insitles Wes mat can't be removed are •Plus we can do it widens tearing up Me
9 N% 9 could happen.•be sdd. pan d what Me public works crews deal world;Noble added.
system. The purpose of Me Milk sewersystem is widt when trying to keep Me sewer system Yet pubic works Wicies say me repair
It. one xl Wom Win, mat is out of W colts wants water from Exiles,showers working. schedule for Me sewer system needs to be
sight out of mind.• Noble sold. 'We don't and sinks,and mangers 1t from homes antl 'when you see a oadl.Its Me dorm- stepped up. Urm Men, Noble said. Me
mink about it mW it lads.- businesses to me Orange Comfy Sanhedrin does—Me fine can fail at any manure,- work crews wW do everything they can W
WdcbcoddbembemelycostiyInother District treatment facility In Fountain Volley. D'Jks wed.•There are pars IM Me system) keep Me sewer system operaamd.
ways. For example. We city of Thousand The system Includes 10,000 ma Wol . where Were asno sewer at all,just a void." Mayor Shhley DenloB said she isproud
Oak s was[fired M.3 carbon Wier one of is which workers use todean and repair ROD Noble sold two state-al-)heart cameras of me efforts city stall and me mfmstmchure
mainsewer arteries released Ed Indian gel- moss of pipeline and 28 underground Wl We city pardtarad about five years ago help consumes is putting foci to help solve Wis
Ion; of cow sewage Into Me never, said stations—mechnism which help W keep keep his Mafl Wowed on me Mate of Me problem,which Is one Mat Effects Me entire
Jeffrey DInser,an anomey who remoteness sewage flowing tonedly city'.se er Wes.The cameras,which can udty
that city. And Noble said problem Miltrale ail amine any line larger Wan 6Inche In w-The day me waiter commit Win on or
He said city officials mainWd Me harsh pans of Me citys sewer system.For exam- diameter,Is what helped me public works me day you flusM1 antl nothing happens,a
FJ Nino see mts Wad took place In February pie,abroad ail of We ktt stations have a Ifin- department compile a detailed fiM of Me the day no one will want to live here:she
caused Me sewer fine to be washed away, iced storage capacity re troublesome pipeWe,some of which said. 'We want to make sure Mat doesn't
dmough others disagree. -which means Mat 9 a backup anus, are Iming up to 6,000 galxe of raw sewage happen.-
IMPERILED PARADISE
Here are ware trances olsewer •Taulwnmaged.$34,553 •Age:el yeast •gallons,lost pa day 911 %m aLOIX OF
pipelines mar irgreryirtMl are an •Number at cracks 37 •Gallons,lost to date:673.874 rM1rOBNMA EErp
aeei,irriticaldiontylat Third. M mOIX OF JOUIT AVENUE •NumberafhdecS •W4lmimrtpinf3L>m •lergm:331 feel
dledy Wbliawodoefiaab lerrpda 331 her •rrelbm bn pady.2lm •p9s]3yean
hem All IM Wwgh tune 19W •Age:70 year •GalMa ant ordale 1.8 ashen mBlO m .NumberolvMs66
•Numbers oal54 -1muca cereFWr.531,9m WANIOORrpVFNUEp11EY •Narria lhow,I
2m KOCN OF AItANFA AVENUE •Numbaaf Mal .Iergdc 315 feet •call trot Per dry:Lay?
•terrglM1:317 feet •Began trot per day b 555 O ELM OF .Ron:)Bar es •gallons,on t to deft:971,226
Al 82 year •Gallons lost todaft:395,316 DELAWARE51NEETAUEY •temM0valse2 •saw cast to repin$3;1m
•Numbasaall •East coat m repent.13a.200 .Length:327kn •Numbs of hake,1
•Number of deli'0 •Age.20 Kan •(I.E.bin per my,11
•GSllenfoul,rday4,214 And aLOIX OF IM STREET ALLEY •Number of all 54 •Gallen bat to date:511.730 Soure:Huntington Beach
•Gallons br to wo:lT millian •Lag0c319fM •Numba all Was:2 •inset con m repeb:53L5m WNicwwksdeparment
Thursdo,,Geuther IS 1998 - cover story Indepandem, 13
THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE PROCESS
60-member infrastucture committee gets familiar with needs, looks for funding sources
kAm1eEN Hnuev > • Neu l Bds<ommunity'
Pb
thh volunteers< lun m stall M1oln od
tnl the volunteers whet
W ith roughly E13 billion needs to be wanted within
tr v _ f Huntington Beach
worth a winawawe
{ T jet y p For example during.re<enl
needs In Huntington
an t! S ;fir monthly meetings committee
Beach a key quertlon looms ( ayla
Where wW Be.money rome .fie`..5 g �� .t "� members heard eswlpresenla
bon on Me condition of Me city's
Iro Firstling the answer Is Just sheets The members were fen
one of several Items the taken on a tour to zee some of
CWsems'lamdeachan Advisory _ the problems firsthand.
eddressIng. -`'�' < a Once members become
Commineeb
Comm4tleadd by Me City harbor with what the needs
Council In March.Bds 60-mem- gr - - are, Dysart said the committee
bar volunteer group n studying - moves on to the next problem
city systems and sWtlures entl uee
will make recommended... to // Edward Robison a member
the council on how to fund - sir, 1* .,f!','. of the Huntington Beach Mobile
Improvements over the next two . Homeowners Association, said
decade �„ :-, he barely knew what the word
The cracked and broken 'ministucture' meant before
sewer goes are one piece of a �' y?. r joining the advisory romminee,
very large purzle of items fat I A- But alter viewing the my's
need to be repeated and may. woe, .,are. and streets,
[.tried, said Chairmen Dick a A. Robison seed he knows exactly
Harlow what it means.
It•not leak one problem,It's Huntington Beech hi in betl
a big problem that deals with _ trouble;he said.'We neverset
the entire Inlraunic,ure,' he - b aide money for tangs we need
said.'were
looking at anything ��_— to have done.'
members
andcity staRMfM
the city owns,' However,Rablaon 4 hopeful
structures that make app Jim ,
Huntington Beach Cigarettes'durinInfirag
a to we Advisory Committee members end city alati the people .. y pant can
Illy-ouch as streets,medeens, walk past crumbling walls during a low of the Huntington Beach Civic Center reronfy. make a tlBferenre by peN<Ipat-
curbs,gutters,sidewalks,block Many city structwers are In disrepair. Ing an the board.
walls,pinks and landaapmg- 'I think we're going to have
are being examined. het we have.' said Gary waist the infrastructure commit. take a comprehensive look at a lot of good come from this
-We need to take care of Dysart, a consultant waisthosed to tee. 'That's why we decided to what's needed to provide ser he said.
Saving the city from sewage is not a glamorous job
■If emergency strikes, 12 men a pipc break, whim me fin a Lill .loti.rs
I with sewage,k broken alarms which can
stand between the city end _ e , d to sewage barking up into peoples
waste water spurs. 1 r ,� t es mid Jerry D11m,a crew leader In
1 the slew ter ember.
LI<n Cnm fast
ldremembers an Instance when
Xt3 �s let work pro etl vilel.
tlaaMl k' A few years beck a IYAnch main
HUNTINGTON BEACH-Theymght �'� ty� lacked and blew up and we had a lOAoot
wear pagers instead of capes and light �,. hula of water antler pressure' Bbchfuid
wage m lead of vWoms but g a sewage I .,;:kF recalled. 'It was like a fountain'
r nif stdkes,these am the menwho .� Burchfield said because the form was so
win come Ins the city rescue, p.;:pr strong, pumping water was not possible.
The .ewes tleportment'a canna water The department relied on a device similar
management division works 24 hours to a large damp.
KLir
Jay cos. which the .ewe, tines and marine
L . 'The renter pump epiUmechanic went on
nations. which are underground through
m M i�@ topof it he swetl ure the pipe re eteeme
i cos to pump the sewage eurough the / toiler and a setl handadd. wrenches to
t nctines Add,12-man tam Is so meh I damp 11 ryou, n you There was
.unctions, thb 12 men teem Lath rya �j/,1' .ter all over you entl you roWMt think
mein We of defense.iti I \ `h beta it because it could be dumping Into
hen
tangs da qo wrong a comp re- 1 Q the bey and you've got to ronbIn 1,
'setl eyes easier sewer where sewage Is Ma
- _, _ _ 'Yaujwtshulyourmaulabetinamthe
qa too Ngh and sets all an ela,m Net �- - " _v+a�:. still they!spewing is waste water-hm-
nrmmaticeuymia.bilii'wlephone in artlous material;b'echlield said.
until a team member,ti reached _ "�•y BbcNleld added fat the division as not
e 91 calls the house,entl a blue computer ' q ppetl with heartlous meledel and.
:.Ice Wks to you and tells you what's wrong awimnc RrvmLLlsnnmelNofM to M aalheonesusetl by the Fire
ike. 'Bddon ell, lea high.' It soon& Huntington Beach employee Les Moore opens Vie entrance to lift sta ion D. Department.
may;said[entl eewmen Mark Burchfield. 'They have uniforms, we Jul have
Armed with hepetes B and typhoid shots,'BtckWeld seek.
:hole and,11 needed.breathing appara[w 'Some ill[ rtellona have a holding B the powergoesouttb tumh Bless BW despite the pads of the job,
n pro[eci against polwnous gaau pro cepetlty of 21 hours, be, some have 15 than 3o minuhee to gel It the pmaki Brea Refbun added the[he enjoys the work.
laced in sewers, team ,members cosh [o minutes to a hail-hour before 11 starts before sewage can begin Beeping into the 'I love Lt. It's not as glamorous as It
nanholes or Bit stations to fir mahunNons dumping: Btrchlleid said. 'So you can't harbor,raw member Rorm Re[hbunsald. sowds,' Refbun said. You Just never
-sometimes with only seconds to spare. play mound' Emergency Mrsubom can very Irons know where going to happen-
l reared Waste is Barred from Newport Bay Page 1 or
News EOJ Pre.Index " co
O.C.COMMUNITIES
A woman is diagnosed 1 I I wf tt1:A- 11
with it every,
minutes
. w�sco
Thursday, October 15, 1998
Treated Waste Is Barred From Newport Bay
■Environment: Superior Court judge says regional quality control board
did not prove benefits of pumping reclaimed water. Opponents feared
effects of heavy metals on the salt marsh.
By JEFF GOTTL/EB, Times Staff Writer
a n Orange County Superior Court judge has told the Irvine
11
RELATED �AjRanch Water District it cannot pump millions of gallons of
highly treated waste into Upper Newport Bay.
O.C. SECTIONS Mark Wolfe, attorney for Defend the Bay, called the decision a
NEWS BY significant step to restore water quality and recreational uses to
COMMUNITY Newport Bay.
"We have a patient with emphysema and gotten him to stop
SPORTS smoking, but we've got a lot of work to restore his health," Wolfe
said.
PREP SPORTS Judge Robert E. Thomas called "erroneous" the contention of
BUSINESS the Regional Water Quality Control Board that the reclaimed water
would benefit the bay.
LIFE&STYLE The regional water board is considering what to do next and
CALENDAR may appeal, said Joanne Schneider, the agency's environmental
program manager.
CALENDAR Ken Thompson, Irvine Ranch's director of water quality, said in
WEEKEND a news release that the district was "surprised and disappointed" at
the decision and continued to believe the project was
HOME DESIGN "environmentally sound." He said the district board will review its
OMMENTARY options.
C
The ruling is the latest move in the four-year fight by Defend the
T.V. TRvtES Bay to prevent the water district from flushing waste into the bay.
The district said the project would reduce the amount of nitrogen
flowing into the bay from San Diego Creek, decrease by about 15
tons the pollution moving into the bay and enhance the quality of
its water.
AWERTISEMENT Critics contended the waste water would include dangerous
levels of heavy metals, phosphorous and organic materials,
encourage the growth of algae and disrupt the fragile ecology of
the salt marsh, where at least two species of birds nest and where
fish make their home.
http://www.metahoUywood.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/OCNEWS/t000093621.htud 10/15/98
Treated Waste is Barred From Newport Bay rage ur .
Looking Irvine Ranch's plan called for as much as 5 million gallons daily
far an of reclaimed sewage water to be sent through a system of duck
apartment? During
leading to San Diego Creek and Upper Newport Bay.
During the summer, the district planned to send more than 3 million
gallons of water daily through the ponds.
5 MOM The environmentalists'fight against the plan began almost as
�^ soon as it was proposed, with Defend the Bay taking the lead with
a lawsuit.
In July 1996, the board allowed the water district, which
promoted the project as a way to save customers money on their
water bills, to discharge the highly treated sewage into the bay.
After protests, Irvine Ranch agreed to sell most of the reclaimed
water for irrigation of greenbelts and golf courses instead.
Earlier this year, Judge Thomas suspended the water control
board's permit, saying it had made procedural errors, and required
it to hold another hearing to reconsider the issue. The board
approved the plan to send the reclaimed sewage into the bay in
April.
State law prohibits new discharges into an enclosed bay unless
the process provides benefits to the waterway. Both sides brought
in scientists to back up their positions.
"The question was, Does science show that's the case? Clearly it
wasn't," Wolfe said. "That's what we have alleged all along. The
discharge was actually going to make it worse."
This marks Defend the Bays second victory in the battle over
Newport Bay. A previous lawsuit forced the federal Environmental
Protection Agency to establish standards limiting the amount of
pollutants that could be pumped into the bay.
Newport Beach previously had reached an agreement with the
Irvine water district that prevented any discharge into the bay until
December, and only allowed it if certain weather conditions
occurred. It also provided a framework for further negotiations.
Newport Beach Mayor Thomas C. Edwards said he was
gratified by the Superior Court decision. "It's a great victory," he
said.
Coovrieht 1998 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved
b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
IRV[NE RANCH WATER DISTRICT,ENVIRONMENT—ORANGE
COUNTY,COURT RULINGS,WATER POLLUTION, WATER You will not
be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
News ao nelndex op
http://www.metahollywood.com/liON E/NEWS/ORANGE/OCNEWS/t000093621.html 10/15/98
Road repairs in Kern about halfway
complete
Filed; October 26, 1998
The Bakersfield Californian
Kern County is about halfway through federally funded repairs of roads damaged by the EI Nido flooding
last winter.
Crews have gradually reopened roads since the mins diminished. About 20 roads remain closed.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency three weeks ago gave county officials the go-ahead to do a
host of road projects that have been on hold for months,said Craig Pope,roads department director.
However,about six large projects estimated at S 100,000 or more are not expected to finish until spring or
summer because of the scope of work needed,Pope said.Those larger projects in the works are generally
for roads that lave much of the pavement entirely missing,Pope said.
Among the more severely damaged roads is Calienm Creek Road.Residents who rely on the road are
unhappy with its closure,Pope said.
"We have done some patching on the road that is there and got what we call an emergency route,"Pope
said.
But then cartel trucks started using the closed road and have damaged the emergency repairs,Pope said.
Road officials still are trying to figure out what they will do next,Pope said.
A carrot truck blocked Calieme Creek on Monday night when it tipped over near Indian Creek Road;
nobody was injured.The driver drove off the edge of the mad in a section that is especially narrow because
of flood damage.
El Nmo left behind some$S million in road damage,Pope said.Of that,the county probably will be on the
hook for about$2 million,with the rest coming from federal and state aid.So far all projects have come in
on budget.
�„ . ..,,."� �.v. .,�......w- ww.c.ay.✓ �wow�ynucuvw �u�renmwu� rtuocaa ragc . w
eW5 I+ GO I e index - GO
� SCIENCE - NELP.?
a y, October 31, 1998
Pilot Program Offers Simplified Permit Process
■ Region: Consolidated application will let South County businesses
submit plans to participating agencies, cities.
By RICHARD AMROSI, Times Staff Wrdr
ocal officials are promising a more efficient process
beginning Monday for companies seeking
environmental permits in south Orange County.
Operating the largest of four pilot programs in the state,the
ADvermsrovar Orange County Permit Assistance Center will help businesses
in South County save time and money,center director Danian
Hopp said.
Businesses operating in the South Orange County Permit
Consolidation Zone will be able to submit expansion or
building plans to as many as 16 state and regional agencies,
along with 10 participating cities, through a consolidated
application.
"In the end,this is an issue of government efficiency," he said.
Any business needing permits involving air or water quality,
hazardous materials,sewers or biological resources will have
the option of using the center, Restaurants,dry cleaners and
computer-chip manufacturers are just some of the businesses
that need environmental permits.
"The beauty of something like this is that as we try to attract
new businesses to Orange County,this could make the
difference," said Julie Puente,spokesperson for the Orange
County Business Council. "It creates a far more friendly
business environment."
Puente,who said permits now can take up to three years to
receive,regards the new zone as a good first step toward
reducing red tape. She said the business community still
questions the need for certain permits.
The pilot program will handle the process for state agencies
such as the California Environmental Protection Agency,the
Air Resources Board,the Integrated Waste Management
Board, and the Department of Fish and Game.
Regional agencies taking part in the consolidation include the
Southern California Air Quality Management District,the
Orange County Environmental Health Division and the Irvine
Ranch Water District.
The participating cities are:Dana Point,Irvine,Laguna Niguel,
Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills,Lake Forest,Mission Viejo, San
Clemente, San Juan Capistrano and Orange.
The center is at Lake Forest City Hall.
Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
http://www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra.../aaaa0027G3 e5446&NS-doc-offset=0&NS-adv-search=0 11/2198
ews Go ¢e naex Go
IMF' i - m ,i..w ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP
Sunday, November 1, 1
Waterways Must Be Protected
13 he hurdles to tampering with natural resources such as
Upper Newport Bay are Justifiably high.New
RELATED REL secTloNs procedures can produce ill effects that last years or
decades.
MAIN PAGE Superior Court Judge Robert E. Thomas last month again
put the brakes on a plan by the Irvine Ranch Water District to
NE WS BY pump millions of gallons of waste water, even after it has been
COMMUNITY highly treated, into the bay.
SPORTS The water district had won approval for the procedure from
the regional water quality control board.But Thomas said the
PREP SPORTS district's contention that adding treated water would improve
the bay's quality was wrong.
BUSINESS An environmental group that formed to battle the plan,
LIFE&STYLE Defend the Bay, cheered the judge's decision,Thomas' second
rejection of the proposal. Also applauding were the Newport
CALENDAR Beach mayor,joggers and walkers along the edge of the quiet
waters,and many who worried that the ecologically fragile
CALENDAR estuary would be permanently banned.
WEEKEND The concern for water quality also should be re-emphasized
HOME DESIGN at the Capistrano Beach Water District,although in a very
different situation.The Orange County district attorney's office
COMMENTARY filed criminal charges last year, alleging that the district
ordered its truck drivers to collect sewage sludge and dump it
T.V.TIMES on the ground outside a treatment plant at Capistrano Beach.
Last month, the district agreed to shut the plant and pay
$75,000 in penalties and costs in exchange for having the
charges dismissed. The plant is near San Juan Creek,which
ArrvvtnsF�FM flows to Doheny State Beach,though prosecutors said they
found no evidence that discharged waste entered the creek.
The chief plant operator pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor
charge of directing district employees to dump the sewage.
Newt Charges against the district were dropped,and it admitted no
wrongdoing under the deal with prosecutors.
The environmental movement has existed long enough and
sunk roots sufficiently deep that directors, executives and
employees of water districts have to be cognizant of the harm
that can be done if operations are not carried out properly.
_ Orange County has endured too many sewer line breaks,
discharges into waterways and beach closings in recent years.
More care is needed to protect the resources that contribute so
much to the quality of life.
http://www.latimes.cOMIHOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000099317.httnl 11/2/98
ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP'k
un ay,November 1, 1998
Top Orange County Races,Where the Leading Candidates Stand in the Contests
for Legislative Districts,County and City Offices
2ND DISTRICT SUPERVISORS RACE
�Dd nOra An Orange County supervisor for the last four years,
RELATED
Silva touts his record as a fiscal conservative and leader
O.C.SECTIONS who helped the county out of bankruptcy without raising taxes.
MAIN PAGE " Political party: Republican
" Age: 54
NEWS BY • Residence: Huntington Beach
COMMUNITY " Education: Bachelor of science,business, San Jose State
SPORTS University, 1966; master's,education,Chapman College, 1974
" Career highlights: Elected to the Huntington Beach City
PREP SPORTS Council in 1988 as pm-development for downtown area.
Elected to county Board of Supervisors in 1994, a month
BUSINESS before the county bankruptcy.
LIFE&STYLE " Priorities: Continue support for the El Toro airport. Work
on reducing the bankruptcy debt still owed by the county.
CALENDAR Oversee a senior citizen help hotline the county will set up
soon.
CALENDAR
WEEKEND DAVE SULLIVAN
HOME DESIGN A Huntington Beach councilman for six years, Sullivan
launched his campaign as an El Tom airport opponent,thus
COMMENTARY garnering thousands of dollars of contributions from South
County airport opponents.
T.V.TIMES • Political party: Republican
Age: 60
• Residence: Huntington Beach
" Education: Bachelor of science,biology,Boston College,
�vEans�t,+�rr 1959; dentistry degree,Tufts University School of Dental
Medicine, 1963; doctor of dental medicine,University of
Detroit Dental School, 1966.
• Career highlights: Elected to Huntington Beach City
i - Council in 1992 as an environmentalist who opposed
1 ' t development of local parks and the beachfront. Opposed police
union's attempted salary increases as "pension spiking."
��• • Priorities: Create new majority to oppose development of
the El Toro airport. Seek televised board - ^etings. Work on
!' land swap with the owners of the Bolsa C:..ca mesa
, Coovriaht 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000099349.1.htm1 11/2/98
I
ZI
O.C. Water
Officials
y Seek Help
U From State
L
N S J Orange County Water District '
officials we urging the state to
N provide more resources to clean
Q V up all spills and ban gasoline-
powered watercraft on drmkimg-
-/' water reservoirs.
O t The district's Board of Direc-
Ctors voted unanimously this
week to approve an ambitious
CU G plan to ban the use of a gasoline
additive called methyl tertiary
•= U do butyl ether (MTBE) within two
L m years. The additive gets into the
cc — drinking-water supply from
aQ. G watercraft using reservoirs.
w O The resolution also recom-
mends new state legislation to
N m pay for MTBE cleanup and to
study the health effects of the
3 1 additive.
Q The resolution was prompted
U IL by the results of a recent MTBE
zstudy by the Lawrence Uver-
a mine National Laboratory. The
C study concluded that MTBE u
u more mobile in ground water
0 than other gasoline additives and
(QCn is extremely slow to degrade in
L. the environment.
O 'The results of the study jus-
tify immediate action to try to
N ban MTBE and get the resources
G7 needed to deal with meting
` MTBE contamination in a timely
manner;' said Kathryn Barr,the
aOrange County Water District
n (A director.
d y MTBE is a gasoline additive
C that enhances co ihustiaq re-
m suiting in improved air quality.
E C —J"GN HANDEL
z Q
N
O
J
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Los Angeles Times Ra-144.
LAWSUIT: O.C. Loses Ruling
• Continued from CI some of its theories,"said aopokea-
O Closes Key Ruling I to comment. woman, Leah Johnson. "ar are
• • Also unaffected are several t pleased and believe t Pinar ruling
firer setthat have be with Wall Street will ainnenu sther Standard Beals co."
• I firma that have been signed but Michael
Dmn Rauacher officials couldn't
In Bankruptcy Cases Yet announced, J. county. reached.
Hannigan,a lawyer for re county. Hannigan, the 't overlook
lawyer.
He said those deals will bring the said Taylor didn't overlook any
focal recovery to about 190 million important issues In ruling against
I for the county and special
echoolnvies the"We've
■ COartR:Judge lain ex-Treasurer However Millie Citron may have been that
low cities
monand n the
financial "We've reviewed the the judge
Citron had I in
4intere t billions"there
dollars to bet on that le. money In the financial he said."It appears to d the Judge
anal authority to low interest tales,"rare was authority to debacle. hoe carefully considered all of the
invest.Decision has no ether[on act, Taylor wrote.Even"grave errors"In The judge-9 ruling came on a arguments. And although we dis-
exerclsing that authority are not prohibited motion made by one of the Wall agree with the outcome, we are
legal settlements already reached. by law,he ruled. Sheet firma named in the county's pleased with the level of deliber-
Counly lawyers Bald they probably will lawsuits, FuJI Securities Inc., a atlon."
By E SCOTr RECKARD appeal the ruling, which negates suits subsidiary of Japan's Full Bank Hennlgan said the county will
trees mArr WRlifa agalnet more than a dozen Wall Street Ltd. ask Taylor to allow an immediate'
In a decision that severe) limits Orange firms that did business with Citron. With Taylor's ruling leaves Orange appeal of the issue of Diemen legal
Y 6 no evidence thine firms realized the rinks County with only a minor claim authority. If the judge refuses, an
County'e chances to recover more bank- the treasurer was running,the theory that against Fuji: that the firm de- appeal would have to wait until
mptcy lasses,a judge ruled Thursday that Citron exceeded his authority was the frauded it of E0 million to$10 mil- after we minor claim against Fuji Is
former county Treasurer Robert L.Citron county's sole cause of sell on against them. lion when It liquidated securities tried,he said.
had legal authority to make the high-risk County lawyers have said privately that held as collateral for loans to The defendants claim the
bond mvestmenuffhat caused the debacle. they had hoped to recoup mare ran Citron In December 1994. county's loan actually In about
In lawsuits against former brokers and $1 billion of the county's 11 an. Fuji's lawyer, Milwaukee attor- t900 million—the$1.94-billion lase
other professionals, the county contended The decision has no effect on the ney Nancy J. Sennett, couldn't be minus the huge extra earnings that
the Investments vitiated the California $739 milafin in legal settlements already reachedlorcomment. Citrorl'a inves0nenta yielded in the
Constitution and state laws.It argued that agreed to by a number of major defendants, Taylor's ruling notwithstanding, yearn before his bete came up
Citron was never authorized to take such notably $437 million from the counly'e the county con proceed with law- loners.
rlaks—end that the defendants therefore former chief investment house, Merrill suits against Standard & poor', Especially when considered
most repay the entire $1.64 billion lost in Lynch&Co. Inc.,which gave county municipal against the lower loan figure, the
December 1994. Merrill Lynch settled the case rather bonds lop ratings before the bank- $770 mutton recovered so far bl
That contention was thrown out by U.S. than risk an unfavorable ruling on re issue ruptcy,and against Vain Rouscher much more.than most experts be-
'strict Judge Cary L Taylor,in a 38-page of Citron a authority—a decision that now Inc., which advised the county on lieved Orange County would
ruling that
the counly'n own lawyers called seems unfortunate for the big Wall Street Issuing those bonds. achieve. And the legal contention
comprehensive on the legal Issues In- firm.A Merrill Lynch spokesman declined Standard&Poor's applauded the that Citron exceeded big authority,
volved. Pleme see LAWSUIT CS ruling, however, noting that It even if treated out In the end, was
negates a part of the county law- the major motivator for the settle-
suit that contended the land rat- ments,Reclusion mid.
Inge agency should have warned "U we were never right about
that Citron was pursuing an Illegal this;' he said,"then it just goes to
course of action. show, as Paul Newman once said,
"The court appears to recognize sometimes nothing is a real cool .that the county her overreached In hand."
COLUMN UNL: Knee-Veep lllsputes IOr <b>Wateryb><b>tSunaloesv1)> rage 1 01 y
Omla - r{p _+ GO
• ;m,tt NEIGHBORHOOD NEWS HELP
Sunday,November 1, 1999
SUNUAY REPORT
Knee-Deep Disputes for 'Water Buffaloes'
■The power of the Metropolitan Water District long went unquestioned.
Now it is mired in inertia,ineptitude.
By TERRYAfCDERMOTT, Times Staff Writer
Inhe last water buffalo in the lower Colorado River basin
grazes in the low green vegetation.The last buffalo in
the lower basin is unhappy.The buffalo's days are
numbered, and he knows it.
Aoveart EMEW He edges through the burnt brown grains,pushing rejects aside,
burrowing on. He doesn't have time for croutons. He came for
the crab.
Charles"Chick" Barker is eating lunch, a crab Caesar,at a
waterside restaurant in San Pedro. Asked to look back at his
life,he looks instead out the window and stares there a while.
"You don't really want to hear this crap,do you?" he asks, then
starts talking about a time in California when the challenges
were clear and the means to meet them apparent.
Barker is the longest-serving member of the board of directors
of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California He's
been on the board for half its existence, 35 years. "He did that,"
another board member says,"and I went to kindergarten."
The Metropolitan,or the Met,as it is often called, is a
confederation of 27 cities and local water districts that stretches
from Santa Barbara to Mexico.It has,since shortly after its
founding in 1928,been the main importer of water to semiarid
Southern California For most of its history,the Met acted as a
potent shadow government, shaping the region. It was one of
those rare public institutions whose enemies and defenders
agreed on what it was: a powerful,impenetrable and arrogant
monolith that did as it pleased.
The Met found water and built whatever it felt necessary to
deliver it—huge dams,vast networks of canals,pumps and
pipelines. Water,Met people like to say,is free. Moving it
costs money.No project was too big or costly.The Met
engineered solutions.
Barker represents the last of an era of water overlords who,
owing to a shared sense of purpose and access to economic
might,ran this water business pretty much as they saw fit.
Critics called them the"Water Buffaloes," a slight intended to
demean then thickheaded,eyes-down,perpetually plodding
approach. Barker takes the name with pride. Plodding is a good
thing,he thinks,if you know where you're going.And boy,did
the buffaloes know where they were going:To get water,ever
and always,to get more water.No matter what anyone said
about the impracticality of getting more,the impossibility of
getting more,or even the immorality of getting more,they
http://www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra../aaaa0000T3df696&NSdocoffset=0&NS-adv-search=0 111!2/98
t-VLUMIN urVh: &nee-ucep 111sputes ror <DY W ater4o><O>t$UliaioesV[) rage L of Y
went and got more.
The result is Southern California.
The Met's power to acquire the area's water supplies
underwrote—some would say dictated—its stupendous growth.
Critics deride the accompanying amorphous sprawl. Defenders
praise the creation of the eighth-largest industrial economy in
the world and the realization of the American Dream for
millions.
Things are different today. There is no more water for the Met
to go get. The main problem in the water world is dividing a
shrinking supply among more people. Environmental and
population pressures are growing. More people and less water
mean more fights: farm against city,north against south,
Arizona against California. These are largely political,not
physical challenges.And the Meta political skills seem to have
atrophied.Its inclinations are still those of the old buffaloes and
their engineers.
The Met is still at the center of regional water politics. It hasn't
shrunk.But it has become a clumsy giant, Gulliver among the
Lilliputians.
Who cares?
Southern California prospered because of the Met's ability to
deliver as much cheap water as anybody wanted. A less able
Met could mean higher prices. It could mean less water. It
would mean,almost inevitably,less growth.
A Ditch That Supports 16 Million People
If you're a stranger here--if, say,your idea of what constitutes
majesty in a waterway derives from the mile-wide might of the
Mississippi or the slippery mysteries of the Columbia River
Gorge—then your awe of ditches might be insufficient.
Take this ditch. From on high,it has some beauty;a shiny line
of pure,straight-arrow angularity,a bright rope pulled taut
across the random warp of the desert floor.
But the beauty is all distant geometry. Up close,every hint of it
disappears. It's a ditch,after all,a silver gray concrete culvert;a
small,plain thing,maybe 40 feet wide. You could spit across
it.
This ditch is,however,distinguished in significant ways.
For one thing, it is the only apparent artificial structure on the
dead brown ground of eastern Riverside County.
For another, it is full of water,a swift stream of it moving west.
It is in the middle of a desert.The temperature boils above 120
degrees.It hasn't rained in months.And the ditch is full of
water, flowing at 1,700 cubic feet per second.
Finally,this ditch,unlike most others,has a name: the
Colorado River Aqueduct.The economic well-being and,in
some cases,physical survival of 16 million people depend on
it.
This ditch is water grandeur, California style. Water here is
among the most domesticated natural resources on the planet. It
is a measure of its domesticity that if any water does eventually
make it to the ocean,water people routinely describe it as
having been spilled. This ditch was built to prevent that from
happening.
Building it required brute force. Dreaming it was crazy.
Imagine Los Angeles of the 1920s.The city government has
http://www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra.../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-doc-offsets&NS-adv-search=0 11/2/98
CULUMN UNL:knee-Deep Disputes lot '<b>Wao:r</U><b>r3urtaloesyb> rage oIY
already completed the Los Angeles Aqueduct,bringing water
to the city from the Owens Valley. The place is awash in water.
There is no obvious need to import more of it
Enormous Gamble in Depression Years
It took a quarter-billion dollars,real money even by today's
standards,and an almost unimaginable sum when voters
approved spending it in the Depression. Given the
circumstances,the Colorado Aqueduct was an enormous
gamble.It paid off.The aqueduct carries one-third of the water
supply for Southern California 300 miles over mountains,
under mountains,under roads,over deserts from the Colorado
River to the sea
The Los Angeles Aqueduct built Los Angeles. The Colorado
Aqueduct built the rest of Souther California, fueling one of
the greatest,most prolonged economic booms in human
history,enabling among other things the creation of drive-in
hamburger stands,the de-centered city and the technical
prowess to win the Cold War.
The aqueduct remains the Met's defining achievement. It set
the agency on the way to becoming the country's largest water
wholesaler.One of every 20 Americans is a customer. That's
more customers than all but three states have people.
The grand conceit of the aqueduct infused the Met with a self-
confidence,blurring into hubris,that is so deep it now seems
genetic.Even now,the agency is building a$2-billion reservoir
in Riverside County. The place is utterly devoid of water to put
in the reservoir,so the Met is also building a billion-dollar
pipeline to fill it with water from up north. Southern California
imports about two-thirds of its water. About half the imports
come from Northern California by way of the State Water
Project and the Los Angeles Aqueduct.About half comes from
the Colorado River via the aqueduct.In the last decade,both
these sources have been reduced.
Growing environmental concerns and political power
essentially halved the water available from the north. Growing
populations and political power in the other states of the
Colorado River basin,notably Arizona,have forced California
to agree to take much.less water from the Colorado.
These tightened supplies have forced Southern California to
manage its water use,rather than simply tum the spigot and let
growth pour out.
Water creates its own impetus for growth by removing an
otherwise unremovable constraint.If you have water, and land,
the capacity for growth is limited mainly by the political will to
stop it,which,if you look over the huge expanse that is
contemporary Los Angeles,has been no match,so far,for the
water buffaloes.
When Plenty of Water Meant Endless Growth
One morning in 1954,Chick Barker was sitting at his desk in
the operations office of the Chevron oil refinery in El Segundo.
His boss,Don Harger,walked in and,in the manner of a boss
in 1954,gave an order.
"Barker," he said,"get interested in the water business."
Barker,in the manner of an employee in 1954,didn't discuss or
argue or ask why.Chick Barker is a pragmatic man,not much
http://www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra../aaaa0000T3df6%&NSdocoffset=O&NS-adv-searches 11/2/98
UULUMN UNIT: Knee-Deep Disputes tor'<b>WaterVb><b>Buttaioes</b>' Page 4 of 9
intrigued by questions that start with the word "why." Besides,
he already knew why.Next to the raw petroleum,water is the
single most critical element in refining oil,a process that
involves repeated heating and cooling. On average, it takes five
gallons of water to produce a gallon of oil. If nothing else,then,
Barker understood the importance of water to the oil industry.
Water,usually,works like this: You turn the tap,it comes out.
But a complex assemblage as much political as mechanical
underlies the simple turning of every tap. California has a lot of
water and a lot of people.The problem is,they're in different
places. Almost all of the complications and,not coincidentally,
costs in the water business derive from this basic imbalance.
The water world that has evolved to address the imbalance is a
confusing place if only by the sheer number of players in it. in
Southern California alone,more than 300 public or private
water companies have some portion of the water business.
Beyond that lies Sacramento and Washington,which are,with
water as with much else, virtual festivals of further
complication.
Oilman Becomes a Water Man
This was the thicket Chick Barker got tangled in. For a certain
type,this can be a pleasing experience. Barker was the type.
While not much interested in whys, Barker is an intuitive
expert at how. He has a gift for reducing complex situations to
their basics. He knows how to make things work. When,for
example,pickets from a longshoremen's strike halted
shipments of supplies and people to the refinery,Barker,
figuring there were no picket lines at sea,commandeered a
surplus landing craft and ferried materials and men directly to
the refinery.
So when his boss gave the order,Barker loyally went out and
got interested in the water business. Very interested, as it
turned out. In short order,he got involved in his local water
district and in 1963 was appointed to represent it on the
Metropolitan.
When Barker went on the board,the directors were all white,
all men. Metropolitan directors in those days served what
amounted to life terms. They came mainly from three places--
real estate,the water business and industry. They presided as a
modem version of knights of the round table, each of the 27
districts a fiefdom. (The number of directors varies over time,
according to a formula based on assessed value of real estate in
each of the areas. For example,there are currently 51 Met
directors;Los Angeles has seven, San Diego six, Orange
County five and so on down to San Marino's one.)
Even given their great number and greater differences among
the areas they represented,directors had in those days a shared
sense of purpose:to get and sell ever more water, enabling
perpetual growth. They saw themselves as unsung igniters of a
great explosion of prosperity.
Ruling the District With an Iron Fist
"We didn't feel it was self-serving in those days," says
Thornton Ibbetson,a land developer who served on the Met
board for parts of four decades with Barker. "It was for the
development of California. We didn't see any conflict. Who
httpd/www.latimes.con/sbin/iawm.../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-doc-offset=0&NS-adv-searches 11/2/98
gULUMN UNE: &nee-Veep Disputes Tor'<b>WaterV b><b>Buttaloesvb>' Page.,)of Y
knows more about growth than developers?"
The Met then was dominated by a series of strong leaders.
When Barkerjoined the board,the most legendary of those
leaders was at the peak of his power. Joe Jensen,an oilman
from Los Angeles,headed the board for 25 years beginning in
1949. Jensen made the Met his job. And he made it clear it was
his alone. He patrolled the district in a chauffeured car and
didn't hesitate to tell everyone from engineers to local water
board directors how to do theirjobs. Back at headquarters,he
was equally forceful in setting the district agenda.
Discussions within the board were rare. If you didn't agree,you
didn't speak. Even if you did agree,you didn'tspeak up until
you had been there for a while.
Jensen didn't give up the chairmanship until he died in 1974,
immediately after which the board amended its rules to limit
future chairmen to two terms. The effect of this has been to
transfer power from the board to the agency staff.No one took
fuller advantage of this than Carl Boronkay,general manager
from 1984 to 1993.
"Carl Boronkay ran the place with an iron fist. If you wanted to
sell something to MWD,I don't care if it was a pencil,you had
to talk to Carl," said Ralph Menvielle,a member of the board
of directors of the Imperial Irrigation District.
Boronkay,who characterizes his reign as simply that of a
corporate CEO,dragged the district into the modem world. The
Penpheral Canal, a favored project of the Met that would have
brought water from the northern Sierra,around the Sacramento
River Delta and eventually to Southern California,had been
defeated.Boronkay recognized the growing political power of
the environmental movement and tried to make common cause.
He often did this to the complete surprise—and sometimes
shock--of the board of directors.
Management Changes at a Complex Time
Boronkay eventually accumulated too many enemies on the
board and resigned as a forceful new board chairman, Mike
Gage,was taking charge. Boronkay's replacement was a more
conciliatory professional water manager from Florida,Woody
Wodraska.
With Gage as the external leader, Wodraska looked inward.
The organization had run pretty much on its own while
Boronkay was off politicking in Sacramento and Washington.
The separate departments functioned with almost complete
autonomy from one another.
"We called them silos," Wodraska said,and he concentrated on
breaking them down.
Meanwhile, Gage,an appointee of Los Angeles Mayor Tom
Bradley,was ousted when Richard Riordan took office.The
chairmanship passed to Jack Foley,an amiable grandfather
who was spending his Army retirement managing the tiny
Laguna Niguel water and sewer district.("I'd like to get rid of
the sewer.Nobody wants to take it," he said.)
Foley is a sharp-nosed, bushy-browed,almost impish Irishman
from Brooklyn. He winks and will say of a woman he's had
some dealings with, "She's a tough broad." He has not been, all
agree,a forceful chairman.
Katherine Moret,a Met director from Los Angeles, said: "God
http://www.latimes.con/sbin/iawra.../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-doc-offsets&NS-adv-search=0 11/2/98
CULUMN UNIT: tSnee Lleep Disputes for'<b>W ater</b><b>t3u1ta1oes<1b>' Page b of 9
bless Jack Foley,he's a nice man,but he's not a leader."
Meanwhile,the world beyond Met's walls came pouring in.
Wodraska now admits he was unprepared for the complexity of
California politics and paid it too little attention. In the
description of one director: "We've got two peacetime generals
and we're in the middle of a war."
"Here's the history of California water in 100 words or less,"
said Tim Quinn,deputy director of the Met. "We used to think
that the way to solve any problem was to build something big.
Then came the Peripheral Canal."
The defeat of the canal in 1982 signaled the end of the Met's
unchallenged autonomy over water and the new power and
persistence of the environmental movement.Moreover,the
courts seemed eager to support the environmentalists'
persistence. Other changes, including modest broadening of the
board's membership, came from within. But with only slight
compromises,the Met in many areas did a pretty good job of
pretending the world was the same as it had always been.
Then in 1995 the Metropolitan finally met an opponent it
couldn't ignore or conquer: itself.
The consensus that had propelled the board for decades
disappeared entirely,beginning in a protracted, corrosive fight
over an important but relatively straightforward issue:whether
to allow one of the 27 member agencies,the San Diego County
Water Authority,to purchase its own supply of water. Not only
would this challenge the Met's monopoly as the region's water
importer, it would cost money because San Diego is the Mefs
biggest customer.The Met's revenues are overwhelmingly
derived from selling water,which creates a sticky contradiction
with the district's efforts to encourage conservation and
diversification of water sources.
But the substance of the dispute quickly ceased to be the main
issue.Name-calling and exaggeration replaced debate. The San
Diego delegates to the Met were extraordinarily strong-willed
and unrelenting. The rest of the Met board, in time-honored
fashion,hunkered down to outwait them.
The debate devolved into bitter personal feuds complete with
civic insults. Los Angeles representatives delighted in
sarcastically dismissing San Diego as a Podunk one-horse town
(or,the modem equivalent,a one-runway town), and began
concerted misinformation campaigns. San Diegans persisted in
saying,falsely,that the Met board had singled them out for
deep cuts in water supplies during the drought of the early
1990s.
Hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent trying to discredit
each other. Clandestine meetings were held in both camps.
Public meetings of the Met board became a farce. San Diego
began bringing its own recording equipment to board meetings,
as if saying the Met couldn't be trusted not to doctor the record
of its own meetings. Every issue--it didn't matter if it was water
quality or building a dam--somehow led back to San Diego's
complaints,which,though exaggerated,were genuine.
Met lawyers began requiring San Diego board members—
representatives of the Mefs biggest customer--to file public
information act requests to get data from the district.
Feud Calls Public Attention to Agency
http://www.latimes.comisbin/iawra.../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-doc-offset=0&NS-adv-search=o 11/2/98
COLUMN ONE: Knee-Deep Utsputes Ior'<tvWatervb>�Ivriuttaloesvb> rage 1 ur Y
"Met failed to keep its best customer happy," said Christine
Frahm,chairwoman of the San Diego board. "That's what it
came down to. So we looked elsewhere."
The feud eventually called attention to the agency in a way that
its great past successes never had.
The agency did not know how to react Family secrets were
being aired in public.
A powerful state senator spent much of the recent legislative
session railing against the Met as"a ghost organization,
arrogant and utterly lacking in accountability."U.S. Interior
Secretary Bruce Babbitt recently characterized Southern
California water politics as being in"disarray."
The uncertainty increased this fall with the sudden resignation
of Wodracka,the Met's chief executive.Foley is also due to
step down as chairman at the end of the year.
The underlying issue in the San Diego dispute has implications
far beyond the Metropolitan: Should water be deregulated?
Should it follow telephones and electricity into the vagaries of
the free market?Water has always been regarded as a natural
resource to be protected and distributed by the government.
Should it instead become a commodity to be bought and sold in
the market like so many frozen pork bellies?
This,critics say,is what the Metropolitan Board of Directors
should have spent the last three years deciding. Instead,they
were not discussing much of anything.They were stranded on
opposite shores of indecision—calling one another names.
Chick Barker is a compact man who,at 83,retains a boxers
round, sloping shoulders. He has thick forearms and fingers.
Even with a stride foreshortened by age,he walks like he
knows where his Rockport are taking him.He wears double
hearing aids,double-thick glasses and short-sleeved shirts, the
pockets stuffed full of pens,pads and scraps of paper. He has a
rough,florid face and a nearly full head of hair.
He is the kind of man who will kiss a lady's hand.He's the kind
of man,in fact, who will kiss a woman's hand even when he
doesn't think she's a lady.It's an old-fashioned sense of doing
what you're supposed to do that still runs deep at the
Metropolitan.
Met board meetings are like family gatherings in a stem great
aunt's parlor. They serve chocolate chip cookies and no one
speaks out of turn.
"It's like a movie going on for years and years. You could leave
the room for a month,come back and not have missed a
frame," said David Freeman,the general manager of the city of
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power who joined the
Met board this year. Freeman has spent much of a 50-year
career in the utility business,most prominently as manager of
the Tennessee Valley Authority. In other words,he has
credentials. Yet when he raised questions at his first board
meeting he was taken aside by a veteran director and,in time-
honored Met fashion,was counseled to wait a couple of years
before speaking again.
For all the changes on the board in recent years,a Met meeting
still looks like Thursday night at the Fullerton Elks. Met people
look like what people everywhere would look like if they
attended a lot of these meetings,ate a lot of those cookies and
the Staimtaster hadn't yet been invented.
http://www.ladmes.com/sbin/iawra.../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-docoffset=O&NS-adv-searches 11/2/98
COLUMN ONE.: Knee-lleep Llsputes I0r'<b>water<Jb> <1o>1$u11a1oesV b> rage a ut 9
This combination of homeyness and reserve, many Met
directors say,makes for a friendly but ineffectual board that
refuses to acknowledge the world has changed, like the
Kremlin during the last days of the Soviet Union.
"Real policy questions like 'What are we supposed to be doing
here.?haven't been asked," said Bill Luddy, a Los Angeles
director.
"The world has changed," said director John Moms of San
Marino. "You must recognize you need to.IMn'tjust stand in
the middle of the road. You keep getting run over."
Water,in the West, is destiny,and the water future of the
region is being decided right now. People talk seriously of
letting old government monopolies like the Met die,replaced
by open water markets with buyers and sellers bidding to see
who gets how much.
The Met seems frozen in place,hampered by its history and
unwilling to acknowledge the changing world. Longtime critics
have mistaken its inaction for the Met's old arrogance and have
stepped up their attacks. Even old Met allies are chiming in.
But much of the criticism is aimed at an organization that in
some sense no longer exists.
Sin of Ineptitude Replaces Arrogance
The Metropolitan, long accused of running roughshod over all
opposition, is today guilty,even its advocates say,of an almost
unimaginable sin: ineptitude.
Barker has watched the decline in horror.He says he had
always agreed with what a wise man--a taxi driver in Las
Vegas—told him: "Water's so goddamned important, 1 know
somebody's going to take care of it."Now,Barker says, "We're
in a very serious situation, as serious as I've ever seen. I'm not
so sure who's going to take care of anything."
The Met meetings are somber affairs conducted under the pall
of gentlemen's club courtesies in rented space in a downtown
high-rise. A new headquarters next to Union Station is due to
open this fall. Typical of the agency's imperiousness,according
to two Met staffers,board members initially did not want
anyone to know they had voted to build it. Also typical of the
agency,the most heated board debate regarding the new
building was where to build a special restroom for the board.
Meetings always open with a prayer, usually written by a board
member. One recent example asked that Southern Californians
be able to "fill their cups from an ever-full aqueduct" Another
sought to "open the intake valves of our hearts" so that its
internal divisions could heal.
Every director has a laptop at his or her position. At a recent
meeting,one director played solitaire on his.Another member
said he and his next-seat neighbor play a game during
meetings—they bet on how many board members will fall
asleep. The record so far is 11.
When people in the water world today survey the turmoil
around them,they frequently refer to "Chinatown,"the
shadowy movie that depicted the first great Southern California
water war.
Its the wrong movie.
There are few shadows in the new water world. Everything is
battered by the cruel bright light of a desert noon.
httpJ/www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra../aaaa0000T3df696&NS-doc-offset=0&NS-adv-seareh=o 11/2/98
(:OLUMN ONE: Knee-Deep Disputes tbr'<W Water<lb><b>ButkaloesV b>' Page 9 of v
If you insist on a movie metaphor,you would do better to
search for one of those safari films in which a rogue elephant
terrorizes hapless villages,trampling through them heedless of
the damage strewn in its wake.The Great White Hunters set off
to trap the rogue. But the plan backfires,and in the climactic
scene,the angry beast makes one last charge right at the
hunters.They shoot to kill. They let fly round after round and
the elephant finally goes down.
It falls with a thunderous cartoon crash,hitting the ground with
such force that all the twigs,rocks, leaves,small animals and
large men on the jungle floor are tossed up into the air,where
they hang,suspended.
That's the shape of the water world today. Shots have been
fired.The elephants, and their friends the water buffaloes,
have crashed to earth.
Everything else is still up in the air.
Next: Directors of the Met increasingly pursue personal
agendas.
♦ rr
Water,Water From Everywhere
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is the
biggest water wholesaler in the nation,stretching from Ventura
County to Mexico and serving 16 million people. Two-thirds of
the region's water is imported via three canal systems--the
Colorado River Aqueduct,the Los Angeles Aqueduct and the
State Water Project.
�1Corrvriuht 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
O Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT,WATER--SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA,WATER--NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER
RIGHTS,BOARDS OF DIRECTORS CHARLES(CHICK)BARKER.
You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
PF[VICVE""CX EEGRC.REEuLTS 66LPCX PYNEL XEITMYTCM
http://www.latimes.com/sbin/iawra.../aaaa0000T3 df696&NS-doe-offset=0&NS-adv-search=0 11/2/98
O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 1 of S
community r �oRme PaOe � 1•J'.y rA ROKEAiveu� . M
T t CAANGF lfNNfY RPG61C1! LI:.�i11:.1�
Outside Orange County
MARK RIOHTMIRE?M Orange Lounly Bear her
Register ril ,Ich
Obilrurlet
OPEN SPACE:This was the
view in from Yorba Linda
toward Anaheim Hills and the
new Eastern Transportation r lei
Corridor,just opened.
O.C. residents favor slower growth
POLL: A Register survey finds split views on
whether the county has grown too much. T,��
November 1, 1998
HOW POLL WAS
By PETER LARSEN DONE
The Orange County Register
The Orange County
A large majority—73 percent Register Poll was
— of Orange County residents conducted by Richard
Hertz Consulting. The
say more limits are needed to poll is based on
manage new development random telephone
expected over the next two interviews of
503
eX
P county residents
from
decades, according to a new Sept.22 to Oct. 1. It
Orange County Register poll. has a margin of error
of plus or minus 4.7
Even more people— 83 percent percent.
— said they would support limits on economic and
population growth in Orange County to set aside land
as permanent open space.
"Our area right now is a disaster," said Helen Ostoich,
67, a resident of Coto De Caza unhappy with the pace
of development in new communities around her.
"They're just building everywhere."
She favors stronger limits on development, but admits
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/I998/1l/Ol/community/po11001w.shtml 11/3/98
O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 2 of 8
they might be tough to achieve.
"I caret imagine what you can do to stop it in Orange
County," Ostoich said. "Orange County is a very
popular place."
The Register poll surveyed residents on a wide range
of issues related to growth: their assessment of
previous development and mistakes that were made in
the past, their concerns about future growth, and the
possibility that some might move out of the county
because of concerns over the increasing crowds and
congestion.
The poll found:
. Disagreement between those who believe growth has
been balanced with concerns such as community
character and open space, and those who believe
development has overwhelmed other interests: 49
percent said it has been balanced, while 41 percent
said there has been too much growth.
. Concerns that the county is growing so large it is
becoming unliveable: 34 percent said they might
move because of growth concerns.
. Optimism for the future: 80 percent said they believe
growth can be successfully balanced.
Between now and 2020, based on current economic
expectations, Orange County is expected to
experience a massive building boom, according to an
extensive review by the Register of county and city
planning documents.
Millions of square feet of office space and 219,000
new homes will cover an estimated 110,000 acres of
— for now— undeveloped land. The county will gain
another 577,000 residents and 746,000 jobs.
That volume of growth continues to fuel a long-
standing debate by residents over the impact of
growth on Orange County.
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/11/01/community/po11001 w.shtml 11/3/98
O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 3 of 8
"There's a legitimate debate, a basic split, over
whether there was too much growth too fast, or
whether there was a good balance," said Richard
Hertz, director of the poll.
"But even the people who feel there's been a good
balance between development and protecting
community character are saying that in the future you
need to be more conscious of making the impacts not
as large," he said.
GROWTH: GOOD OR BAD?
In several questions, the poll asked residents to
evaluate the growth of Orange County from the past
to the present.
How well had the county balanced competing
concerns: economic growth,jobs and housing vs.
community character, open space and freely flowing
traffic?
The overall results found a narrow split: 49 percent
saw balanced growth, 41 percent saw a bias toward
growth.
Viewed from different angles, the numbers offered
further insight into the way Orange County feels
about growth:
. Residents in the north part of the county were more
likely to see growth as good than those in the south:
50 percent of those in the north said growth was
balanced, compared with 44 percent in the south.
. Young people— 30 or younger— saw development
more favorably than older residents: 64 percent
younger than 30 said there was a good balance,
compared with only 39 percent of those ages 30 to 45.
. Hispanics also were more likely to see development
as a plus than any other ethnic group: 57 percent said
it was balanced, compared with 44 percent for whites.
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/11/01/community/po11001 w.shtml 11/3/98
O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 4 of 8
. Oldtimers were more negative about growth than
newcomers: 57 percent of those who have lived here
25 years or more said growth was overwhelming,
while only 29 percent of those who have lived here
five years or less said there was too much growth.
In explaining their points of view, many pointed to the
master-planned cities and communities of Orange
County as examples of the good and the bad sides of
development.
"I think in south county they've done it in a pretty nice
way," said Sharon Logan, 51, of Anaheim, who
believes that growth has been balanced.
"There are ways to do it to deal with the numbers of
people who need houses and jobs and not have that
closed-in feeling," she said.
"As a general rule, I think things are going fine," said
Richard Ortiz, 52, who, like Logan, believes growth
has been balanced.
He moved to Irvine two months ago, after 20 years in
Garden Grove. In his new city, he senses that city
planners have tried to ensure that it grows into a
liveable city.
"For Irvine, I think the development of the homes was
done nicely," he said. "And we do have lots of parks."
Yet others see those same tidy streets and
neighborhoods as the bad side of growth—places
that evolved in an orderly fashion, but without the
sense of character or community found in older cities.
"In Irvine, the way the neighborhoods were so well
planned you get lost," said Mary Galagar, 25, of
Yorba Linda. "You feel like you're in a maze. You
travel down these long avenues, but you're not
anywhere. It's all the same."
The south and east parts of the county are the areas
were the most growth is expected over the next
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/1 I/0l/community/poll001 w.shtml 11/3/98
O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 5 of 8
decade, given current economic indicators, according
to planning documents.
For Ostoich, who believes there is too much growth in
the county, that means more roads and buildings to
fill the hills and valleys around her Coto de Caza
home.
"When we bought here, we were told they couldn't
build on the ridge," she said. "Well, now they're
building on the ridge.
"I can't believe the change in eight years. I'm
shocked."
GROWTH MISTAKES?
The Register poll also asked residents to list examples
of mistakes made in Orange County development in
the past — or things that could be done to improve
the quality of life in the future.
Most listed four topics: roads and traffic congestion,
27 percent; developed too fast, 25 percent;
development poorly planned and lack of open space,
both 15 percent.
"Traffic is the daily social indicator of growth in a
region," said Mark Baldassare, a professor of urban
and regional planning at the University of California,
Irvine, and director of the Orange County Annual
Survey.
" 'Is it more or less congested than it was a year ago?
And what are we doing about the infrastructure to
cope with the growth and development that's taking
place?'
"This is how most people experience the growth of a
region and make an assessment about whether a
region has grown too fast or too big," he said.
Even those who indicated they believe that growth is
balanced said traffic is a problem.
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/1 I/Ol/community/po11001 w.shtrnl 11/3/98
O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 6 of 8
"I get absolutely frustrated when it takes 45 minutes
to an hour to get to work," said Stephanie Ernster, 33,
who commutes from Fullerton to the Santa Ana civic
center.
"I know they're making improvements on the freeway,
but it's every freeway that's congested," she said.
"Now it's gone to surface streets."
Ostoich said she tries to time her trips to miss the
crowds at the gates to Coto de Cana and on surface
streets in neighboring communities such as Rancho
Santa Margarita.
"You just have to know when to get out and when not
to," she said. "That's what happens when you build
like crazy."
Sheila Czajkowski, 46, of Fountain Valley mentioned
traffic— but also the rapid pace of development and
the loss of open space — as mistakes made in Orange
County.
She talked wistfully of how Pacific Coast Highway
between Newport Beach and Laguna Beach once
offered beautiful views of undeveloped coastal
hillsides.
"That was really nice," she said. "Now they're
building up the houses, and I assume more is coming.
"Gosh,just so people can have an ocean view? It's
sad."
FUTURE GROWTH, FUTURE LIMITS?
Regardless of their views on previous development,
when asked to consider the future most residents
interviewed for the poll — 80 percent —were
optimistic that growth can be balanced.
They supported limits to achieve that balance —
especially to preserve more open space.
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/1 1/0 I/community/po]100 lw.shtml 11/3/98
O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 7 of 8
Still, 55 percent said they preferred that new housing
in the future be directed to areas that now are lower-
density instead of existing cities.
"People want their region to be growing and
expanding, but they want their locality to stay the
same — and, of course, that's an impossible dream,"
Baldassare said.
Emster said as much in her chief complaint about
growth—the traffic that makes her crazy is the fault
of people who live in Riverside and San Bernardino
counties who commute into Orange County for work.
"Corona and Chino are all coming into our county
because we pay better, and that's hurting us," she said.
Create more jobs in those counties and growth in
Orange County will be balanced, Emster said.
Michael Sykes, 38, of Costa Mesa said he believes it
is possible to balance growth, in principle —though
in Orange County the time for that may have passed.
"It's too late," he said. "The horses are out of the
barn."
The problem is the lack of an effective slow-growth
movement here, Sykes said. "There doesn't seem to be
a voice of reason talking about limiting growth," he
said. "And people are feeling helpless."
Others were more optimistic.
"What I would do is stop tearing down the old
buildings," said Galagar, whose favorite places
include Old Towne Orange and downtown Fullerton.
"Maybe make an area like the Third Street Promenade
in Santa Monica, where you can walk at night."
Logan said she believes growth can be balanced if it
comes with adequate support services —new houses
and shopping centers need new roads and sewers and
the like.
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/11/01/community/po11001 w.shtml 11/3/98
O.C. residents favor slower growth Page 8 of 8
Ortiz offered a similar hope for the future.
"Things will continue to grow," he said. "There just
has to be some real good planning on where to build
and grow."
Hertz said the results of the poll suggest that residents
—no matter their view on growth— have learned
from past growth in the county.
"Even those who are satisfied with what happened in
the past may be educated by that experience," he said.
"And they want future planning policies to be more
conscious of the effects of growth."
Next: What Orange County residents have to say about
the future of the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station site.
81n ,oapr In Orange county.CalromW
CapyrlgM tyre Orange GouMy flop)&er
Plan.wM m mmonno nh I. 1pglsmr®I'nM hootl_�cym
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/I1/01/community/poll001w.shunt 11/3/98
COMMUNITY CHARACTER VS. IS BALANCE POSSIBLE? GROWING OUT OF THE
GROWTH COUNTY
i Overall,In Orange County,do you feel there has been a good Do you feel it is possible for an area to develop In a way Asked what might cause them to leave the county,
balance between these competing interests,or do you feel that offers adequate economic growth,fobs and housing residents listed:
there has been too much emphasis on one or the other? while maintaining the character of the community and
Not certain: protecting open space and the environment? Reasons Countryside
6%
Too much —� Not certain: Growth and overpopulation: 50%
emphasis on. No 131/T. 7% Traffic and congestion: 45%
openspace: Crime: 17%
�414 Too much Cannot afford cost of living: 13%
emphasis on I Cannot find affordable housin 9%
growth k, yes'80%. 9:
41% . ,
Residents of north and south Orange County differed on ;
Asked for examples of mistakes made In development residents in why they might consider a move:'
all parts of the county listed several common themes: .North South
Responses Percentage Reasons Count- County
'Residents of north Orange Countyy we re slightly more positive about Roads and traffic congestion: 27% Growth and overpopulation: 53% 43%
growth than residents of south county: 9
Responses North County South County Developed too fast 25% Traffic and congestion: 50% 39%
"Good balance 50% 44% Development poorly planned: 15% Crime: 24% 7%
Too much growth 40% 47% Lack of open space: 15% Wrong element moving In: 12% 2%
Stine:Orangebounty Register Pall
LIMITS ON GROWTH? would you SupportsetOng
The poll focused on growth aside certain areas as
iA
issues.Here aresome responses. Permanent open space if
Others on page 18. this requires placing limits
oneconomicand
Do you feel there should be population growth in
stronger limbs placed on growth Nose areas?
In Orange County? Not certain:
Depends on 4%
j limits:]% No:
No:20% 9%
?FBa HMXI51fhe Orange County Register
Yes:]3% Yes t3%
In Mission Viejo on Feather Ridge Trail near Oso Parkway '' 'S$;
and Antonio Parkway,workers frame the roofs of new Depends.
homes.O'Neill Regional Park and Trabuco Creek liejust Soma:Orange County Reyirter roll spedfics:4%
below the development. The many.Ovary Register
open Space in Project l-nucizeu Page 1 of i
eWS GO le 0 eX .� GG
- t ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP?
/d/
FROM LAX TO SAN JOSE I
J
Monday, November ,
Open Space in Project Criticized
. Land use: Regulators wonder if Saddleback Meadows"wildlife
corridors'are big enough.
By DEBORAHSCHOCH, Times Staff Writer
�I I first glance, Saddleback Meadows looks like a cookie-
cutter version of many other projects springing up in the
RELATED Orange County foothills. It's to be a gated community of
G.C.SECTIONS single-family homes grouped around cul-de-sacs in the
MAIN PAGE Trabuco Canyon area,with price tags of$300,000 and up.
But a unique and highly contentious feature can be found in
NE WS BY one comer of the project map: a 500-foot gap between house
COMMUNITY lots labeled a"wildlife corridor,' through which rare birds and
SPORTS other wild creatures would travel.
And on the eve of a vote Tuesday on the project by the
PREP SPORTS Board of Supervisors,concerns have escalated as to whether
that corridor is wide enough to serve as the crucial link for a
BUSINESS much-hailed county network of wildlife preserves.
LIFE&STYLE While county planners appear satisfied, state and federal
regulators continue to raise concerns that the corridor is flawed.
CALENDAR In fact,the state Department of Fish and Game plans to provide
information to supervisors Tuesday,said department official
CALENDAR Bill Tippets.
WEEKEND "It's a big deal. It's a critical linkage area." added biologist
HOME DESIGN John Bradley of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
In fact, Saddleback Meadows promises to be a litmus test of
COMMENTARY a nationally touted program intended to help stave off
T.V.TIMES extinction for Orange County's rare plants and animals. That
program, launched by Gov. Pete Wilson with the support of
U.S. Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt,has already produced a
sprawling, 37,000-acre preserve in the county's central and
coastal areas, and a second preserve in South County is
ADVERTISEMENT planned'
A key link between the two reserves: the picturesque wilds
of Saddleback Meadows, flanked by two religious centers and
hills rich with native plants and animals. And with supervisors
N•w s poised to approve the housing project on 222 acres,some state
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000099468.htrnl 11/2/98
Open Space in Project Lritrcrzea rage Z ut J
and federal regulators worry that it will block the Flow of
y wildlife.
J�C•:r Some regulators and environmentalists fear that if rare
songbirds and other animals cannot travel between the two
reserves,the costly and complex Natural Community
Conservation Plan reserve program blessed by Babbitt and
VISA Wilson could be derailed. Instead of a network of reserves,the
county could have two reserve"islands,"with encroaching
suburbanization threatening the future of rare wildlife.
County planning administrator Tim Neely defends the
proposed link.
"Obviously a wider corridor would be preferable,but this
project has a long and complicated history. And in light of that
history,I'm not sure that this proposed corridor is
unreasonable,"Neely said.
"It's hard for me to imagine this is so terrible in light of all
the work we've done," said Pike Oliver,a principal with
Newport Beach-based TPG Management Inc.,which is
managing the project for landowner California Quartet.As for
the concerns of state and federal regulators,Oliver said, "Pve
never seen an agency that hasn't asked for more."
The debate over Saddleback Meadows stretches back two
decades,with plans taking many forms,from a 318-home
project to a cluster of 705 mobile homes.
Opponents include environmental groups and the
neighboring St. Michael's Abbey and the Ramakrishna
monastery.The abbey is owned by the Norbertine Fathers of
Orange,a Catholic religious order,while the Ramakrishnas are
an independent faith tied to Hinduism.
The two religious centers have retained attorney Edmond
Connor,who heads the county Bar Assn.,and have spent
months attempting to craft a compromise. One plan calls for a
conservancy to buy 178 acres of the California Quartet
property to preserve it for open space.
The purchase would be financed with$1.5 million from the
county and$3.7 million from the Saddleback Meadows Land
Conservancy,formed by the Norbertine fathers and benefactor
Kathryn Swiss,Connor said.The developer could then build
homes on the remaining 44 acres.
But the negotiations,assisted by Supervisor Todd Spitzer,
apparently ran aground,although talks reportedly will continue
today.The 299-home project,meanwhile, was approved 4-1 on
Oct. 7 by the county Planning Commission.
"The story here is that the cowry is processing this thing at
breakneck speed," Connor said.
A local review board,in fact,has asked the supervisors to
postpone action because it lacked time to study it properly.
Based on the information at hand,the Foothill Trabuco
Specific Plan Review Board voted 4 to 0 with one abstention to
oppose the project.
But others say the county has had ample time for study.
"It's time for the county to decide what it wants—to at least
decide the outside of what's going to happen on this property,"
said Oliver with the fine managing the project.
"I believe we've done what we can do within the limits of
our discretion to advance an alternative that our biologist has
advised us satisfies reserve design requirements," said Neely at
http://www.latimes.com/HOMEINEWS/0RANGE/t000099468.html 11/2/98
Open Space in Project Criticized page 6 of S
the county.
Yet,state and federal officials have failed to reconcile their
differences with the county over the projeefs effects on
wildlife.
In a joint Aug. 11 letter to county supervisors,the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service and the state Department of Fish and
Game outline what they term "significant biological issues
related to the project site."
For instance,the federally endangered Riverside fairy
shrimp can be found in at least seven wetlands on the property,
the letter states. The rare cactus wren has been found on site,
with the threatened California gnatcatcher found nearby.
A 299-home project poses "a significant threat" to the
existing habitat connection,the letter states. It asks the board to
consider an alternative that would allow development"while
maintaining an essential biological connection"between the
two reserve areas.
But in an Oct. 19 memorandum,Neely reported that a
biologist with Dudek and Associates,which works for the
county and South County landowners,had concluded that with
proper replanting of vegetation,the proposed corridor would
allow movement of birds and small mammals.Neely
recommends the county conclude that the project"will not
preclude or prevent the preparation" of a South County
preserve.
That conclusion is"premature," said Bradley at Fish and
Wildlife. "We haven't gotten far enough along on the analysis
of reserve designs." And environmentalist Pete DeSimone goes
even further.
"If the 299 homes go in,and the wildlife movement area is
impacted to the extent we expect," DeSimone said, "then our
ability to come up with a viable [South County preserve] is
severely compromised,if not impossible."
• as
How Much Is Enough?
The Saddleback Meadows community in the Trabuco
Canyon area wuld include a 500-foot gap between homes to be
set aside as a wildlife corridor.
Convrieht 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
Seatch the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about
ENVIRONMENT—ORANGE COUNTY WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT.
OPEN SPACE,ORANGE COIJN7Y—DEVELOPMENT AND
REDEVELOPMENT,TRABUCO CANYON(CAl.You will not be
charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
_aW5_ _._. GO __ GO
http://www.latimes.con-dHOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000099468.html l irng
ramt ar a ttas aouuu atwua pama uu muct.-nuctaug uccn
CE
t2tL�lL'nalogy sEo oxs�_E - M uMAa rn s m
ocregister.com LLiWi�
Farm area has doubts about plan for
muck-sucking trees ,��,
ENVIRONMENT: An experiment would use
trees to rid the round of waste. T"arknof s°acifi: �°
poplar 9 Edgeo Mature
Edge°I Nature
October 16, 1998 at°'t°
tdba
O:ean Page
By HANS GREIMEL our unieeise
The Associated Press Se vi.
Thank
DALLAS, Ore. — Some people living in and around 11 ^ -^
this fainting community are fighting a city plan to use
a grove of poplar trees to suck sewage and industrial �� T'
waste from the ground like 100-foot soda straws. Tr --_—
The experimental new approach is generating interest
globally as a green solution to a messy problem, and --- --_
Dallas is one of the fast places to try it. The city plans
to spray the trees with waste water from a computer
circuit-board factory. The waste contains salts,
copper, heavy metals and possibly cyanide.
Scientists say the poplars will rid the ground of
ammonia and nitrogen by safely metabolizing the
compounds in their wood, keeping the heavy metals
and salts fixed in place in the soil. But some
neighbors believe the grove taking root in their back
yards will be another toxic waste dump that will
poison their wells.
"We're absolutely outraged about the whole process,"
said Penny Cox, who heads a dozen residents suing to
block the plan.
Dallas has planted almost 1,300 knee-high saplings
on a 3-acre test plot and could begin dumping the
water as early as next spring. If the three-year
demonstration succeeds, a full-scale project could
reach 175 acres.
"It isn't a hazardous-waste site," said City Manager
http://w -ocregister.com/science/I 6toxsuck.shtml 10/16/98
Roger Jordan. "The scale of it is small enough that
there won't be any long-term or short-term
environmental impacts."
The city of 11,000 discharges nearly 2 million gallons
of treated sewage water a day directly into Rickreall
Creek. But in the summer, when the river runs low,
the discharge exceeds legal concentration limits. The
solution: a technology developed in the past three
years that relies on fast-growing hybrid poplars to lap
up nearly 3,000 gallons of waste per acre per day.
However, scientists acknowledge that if the soil
acidity isn't carefully maintained, some contaminants
could leach into the groundwater. And that's what has
residents worried.
a1 newspaper In Orange County,Calfforni.
U ..
Copyright 1998 The Onrge County Register
Please seM comments to o isterRIink treedom.w
http://www.ocregister.com/science/i6toxsuckshtml 10/16/98
Sewage spill shuts portion of neat ream
communitysErnoxs ixaaxtrru�
ome age p;� m' u o ccess iF
ME 0xAN6E COUNTY RWISTEF 'rl�
ocregister.com iW�y
Outside Ora rqe County
Sewage spill shuts portion of Seal Fie`,tch
Beach obituaries
October 13, 1998
By HEATHER MacDONALD
The Orange County Register
An overflowing sewage pipe closed a small portion of �—
Seal Beach Sunday morning, but officials said the
whole beach should be open again Wednesday
morning.
"The crowds this time of year are minimal;" said
lifeguard Jeff Aldinger. "You couldn't even tell the
difference."
About 10 am. Sunday, a surfer notified lifeguards
that a pipe on the Seal Beach Municipal Pier was
emptying into the ocean and onto the beach. The
Orange County Enviromental Health Department
determined that the liquid was wash water and
sewage, said lifeguard Capt. Steve Cushman.
"Now we're just waiting for the water samples, which
shouldn't take more than another day or so," Cushman
said.
Roughly 100 yards of the beach was closed on both
sides of the pier, from Eighth Street to IOth Street.
Bathrooms on the pier were also closed. No
swimmers, surfers or sunbathers were turned away
because of the spill, nor was anyone sickened or
injured, officials said.
The pipe feeds into a holding tank in the Eighth Street
parking lot, which in turn connects to the main sewer
on Ocean Avenue. The contents of the pressurized
holding tank empty into the main tank twice an hour,
or when the holding tank is full. When the pipe
overflowed, so did the holding tank, sending the
http://www.ocregister.com/commurlity/beachOl3w.shtml 10/16/98
......ug., ay... auuu pw...w... ................. . —_' — -- —
sewage into the ocean.
The city-owned pipe removes waste from nearby
Ruby's Restaurant. Business at the restaurant was not
affected by the spill.
i1 newspaper in Orange coaft Celffoaaa
'l�egisfier'
Copyright mmo9a Tha Orange County nalin Register
Please send comments io odeaister®link.freetlom.com
http://www.ocregister.com/cornmunity/beach013w.shtml 10/16/98
Carwashes Get Huge Bills for Superfund Site Cleanup Page 1 of 5
News !� co Site Index
FRONT PAGE HELP
Monday, October 19, 1998
Carwashes Get Huge Bills for Superfund Site Cleanup
■Pollution: Charges run into six figures although only dirt from cars
went to Monterey Park toxic waste dump.
ByANTONIO OLIVO, Times Staff Writer
o much time had passed that Tim Wilson nearly forgot he
once operated a carwash in Sherman Oaks near the Cadillac
dealership he has owned on Ventura Boulevard for more than 30
years.
ADVERTISEMENT But when he opened the mail recently, Wilson was painfully
reminded of the Casa De Cascade Car Wash, closed in 1980 due to
poor revenues.
News Inside an envelope from the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency was a bill for$142,500, Wilson's share of the cost of
Looking cleaning a Monterey Park toxic waste site that he had no idea
for an existed. His contribution to that Superfund site?Dirt that had been
apartment? washed from the cars, stored in a holding tank and later trucked
there, the EPA said.
"What the hell is this?" the 68-year-old car dealer recalled
a..S saying that June morning. He said he had been careful over the
years to comply with every environmental regulation on the books.
The EPA acknowledges that Wilson and about 680 area
businesses and public agencies that recently received bills did
nothing wrong. Instead, EPA officials said the group acted
responsibly over the years by sending their waste--soapy carwash
mud, petroleum products, industrial cleaning solvents qr regular
household garbage—to a licensed landfill built by Operating
Industries Inc. in 1948.
But because the Monterey Park landfill has since been turned
into a Superfund site, those billed must, under federal law, help
foot the$600-million cleanup cost, officials said.
Their portion of the cost, officials said, is based on the volume
of waste they sent to the site that was closed in 1984, and not its
level of toxicity--something that has outraged carwash owners like
Wilson.
The group's predicament, common among thousands of
businesses near closed-down landfills across the country, lies at the
core of current efforts in Congress to reform the federal law
framing the EPA's Superfund program, which has a budget of
http://www.metahollywood.com/HOME/NEWS/FRONT/t000094967.htm] 10/19.198
t,wwasnes bet huge nws for aupermna bite ueanup rage c ui
$1.39 billion this year.
Critics say the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (known as CERCLA)unfairly
punishes businesses--small and large—that are only remotely
connected to Superfund toxic waste sites being cleaned by the
EPA-
Enacted in 1980 as a result of New York's Love Canal crisis,
the law "is something that has not made sense for a long time," said
Drew Page, a San Diego attorney who has pushed for Superfund
reform on behalf of the Downey-based Western Car Wash Assn.
"It's irrational and needs to be changed."
'This Bill Is Not a Penalty'
EPA officials and environmentalists defend the law, saying it is
the only fair way to recover money needed to clean up the 1,436
Superfund sites that are polluting soil, ground water and drinking
water sources throughout the country. Of those sites, hundreds are
closed-down landfills.
"This bill is not a penalty," said Arthur Haubenstock, an EPA
attorney in charge of recovering money needed to clean the
Monterey Park landfill. "We're not saying [the 680 businesses] are
immoral or illegal or wrong."
Rather, "it's just a question of who should have to pay for
cleaning up this mess," he said.
The site is bordered by the Pomona and Long Beach freeways,
Haubenstock noted.
"There are a huge number of commuters who pass by it every
day," he said. "You've got gases from there percolating into
people's houses."
The 680 businesses and municipalities are considered by the
EPA to be minor polluters. Documented to have contributed
between 2,100 and 110,000 gallons of waste to the landfill since
1948, their group includes carwashes, light manufacturers, auto
repair shops, municipalities and a few high-profile corporations,
including the Walt Disney Co.
Other companies and municipalities that dumped more than
110,000 gallons of waste at the 190-acre site are considered major
polluters by the EPA
That group--responsible for more than half of the heavy
industrial waste causing problems at the Monterey Park site—was
billed by the EPA during the late 1980s. Of that group of major
polluters, 133 have agreed to pay a combined S300 million.
Though the 680 businesses and municipalities are not
considered by the EPA as major sources of the toxic pollution in
Monterey Park, under the liability law they can each be held liable
for the entire $600-million cleanup cost of the Superfund site.
Should they decide to ignore the EPA's recent notice, the minor
polluters could also be sued by the group of major polluters for
even more than what the federal agency is asking for.
http://www.metahollywood.com/HONE/NEWS/FRONT/t000094967.html 10/19/98
Carwashes Get Huge Bills for Superfund Site Cleanup Page 3 of 5
Those companies—which, according to the EPA, include Arco,
Chrysler Corp. and Times Muror Co., which owns The Times—
seek to recoup from minor polluters like Wilson some of the $300
million they have contributed. Attorneys for the major polluters say
they have already sued and recovered about $75 million from other
polluters who refused to pay the govertunent.
The EPA advised the minor polluters to settle their bills,
promising them legal protection from the corporations as a result
and offering a 5% cost reduction if they paid right away.
Feeling trapped, carwash owners call their predicament unfair.
Their waste—essentially soapy mud—is on the cleaner side of the
spectrum of industrial solvents, oil and city trash legally sent to the
Monterey Park landfill for decades, the carwash owners contend.
Critics complain that the bills for carwash waste—ranging from
$7,200 to $377,000 per business—are typical of how minor
polluters are steamrollered by the federal law intended to clean up
more toxic pollution.
Several carwash owners in the Los Angeles area have hired
lawyers to fight their bills. Because the state has assured industry
groups that their waste is not considered hazardous--unless engine
steam-cleaning is part of their services—the carwashes are disputing
the bills.
EPA attorneys said the businesses have until the end of October
to pay.
Attorneys for several carwashes said their clients have been
refused help from their insurance companies because they were not
covered for toxic pollution before 1980, when the law went into
effect. Many, like Wilson—who did not steam-clean engines--said
they didn't think they needed such coverage, given the state's view
of their waste.
State and federal officials, however, said what is considered
nonhazardous by California is not necessarily viewed the same way
by EPA officials.
Carwash owners complain that is unfair.
"We feel we have demonstrated for years that our[waste] is not
hazardous," said Sam Olivito, executive director of the 600-
member Western Car Wash Assn.
"This law brings us into a group of polluters that we shouldn't
be in," he said. "This could put a lot of our folks out of business."
Mike Genewick, whose Carson carwash was billed for
$103,000, said, "The law is ludicrous."
Referring to an EPA estimate that does not foresee completely
removing the toxic waste from the Monterey Park landfill for
another 80 years, Genewick said: "The only people benefiting from
this are the attorneys and the environmental consultants, because
nothing is getting cleaned up."
The provision that makes it possible for the EPA to hold a
single party liable for the entire cleanup cost of a Superfund site is
a tort law measure called "joint several and liability." Essentially, it
means that an ounce of pollution at a Superfund site linked to your
http://www.metahoflywood.com/HONMINEWS/FRONT/t000094967.htnil 10/19/98
Carwashes Get Huge Hills for Superfund Site Cleanup rage 4 or D
business can make you legally responsible for the entire cleanup
cost.
That aspect of Superfund cleanup and the fact that businesses
can be punished retroactively for actions that were legal before
1980 are the chief sources of complaints about the EPA's
Superfund program.
Consistently upheld by federal courts, "the retroactive nature of
the law is perhaps one of the most litigated issues of all time," said
Dallas attorney David Whitton,who has helped craft a number of
Superfund reform bills that sit in congressional committees
awaiting approval.
"What you did that was legal in the 1950s suddenly becomes
illegal today," he said. "That logic has affected a lot of small
businesses and insurance companies."
The rationale behind aggressively going after minor polluters is
one of fairness, EPA officials said. Because toxic waste sites are so
expensive to clean, it is necessary to spread the burden of cost
evenly among those who have contributed, said Kathleen Johnson,
who oversees the legalities of EPA cleanup efforts in the western
United States.
"It is not fair to the major contributors for us to just dismiss the
fact that there were hundreds of other people who brought in
smaller amounts" of hazardous waste to landfills like the one in
Monterey Park, she said.
The point of the "joint several and liability measure" is to scare
polluters into paying what the EPA determines to be their fair share
of the cost, Johnson said. Most businesses agree to pay the much
smaller bill presented the EPA before the question of enforcing that
provision arises, she said.
Critics complain that in cases where the connection to toxic
pollution is either hazy or insignificant, the measure puts unfair
pressure on businesses to fork over cash for a problem they are
only minutely responsible for.
Many small businesses that pay the EPA do so because they are
convinced the legal expense of fighting their bills would be even
higher, critics say.
"When you hold that kind of hammer over people, it is not a
level playing field," said Kip Prahl, a Sacramento-based
environmental consultant. "These are a lot of innocent people who
have had their trash picked up like everybody else."
But because they are businesses, he added, "the government
takes a very heavy hand with them. Twenty years after the fact, all
of a sudden the government comes back to them and says: 'You did
a very terrible thing.'And they say: 'What did I do?"'
Carwash Owner Says Business Has Fallen Off
That's how Richard Duffy, owner of Burbank's Lakeside Car
Wash, responded to his $58,000 bill.
"I just don't understand it," he said. "I thought I did everything I
http://www.metahollywood.conVHONM/NEWSIFRONT/t000094967.htn l 10/19/98
Carwashes Get Huge Bills for Superfund Site Cleanup Page of D
was supposed to."
With dirty cars not rolling in like they did shortly after he
opened his shop in 1948, Duffy said he will be hard-pressed to
come up with the money. His insurance company has also refused
to help, he said.
On the advice of the Western Car Wash Assn., Duffy said he
will probably ignore the bill and hope it will go away.
"I'm going to let nature take its course," he said.
David Giannotti, a Los Angeles attorney who represents the
group of large companies that have already settled with the EPA
for$300 million, promised aggressive legal action in response to
such an approach. Perhaps fearing reprisal from Giannotti s group,
some on the list of 680 have already settled their bill, EPA officials
said.
Giannotti acknowledged that the position minor polluters are in
is unfair, but "the law is what it is. They must pay their share as we
move forward to what we hope is a final remedy" on the Monterey
Park site.
"There are a number of things about CERCLA that just cry out
for change," said Giannotti, who represented one of the polluters
involved in the Love Canal case during the late 1970s and has
specialized in Superfund law ever since.
As it stands, the nature of the law "is one that forces [major
polluters] to be sure to pull in as many others as they can" into the
process of cleaning a Superfund site, he said. "Whether it's the local
mom-and-pop store or Exxon Oil."
In the case of the landfill in Monterey Park, EPA officials have
determined that about 1,500 additional Los Angeles-area
companies—senders of even smaller amounts of waste than the 680
now targeted—can be tapped next to help pay for the cleanup.
Because they sent less than 2,100 gallons of waste to the
landfill, their bills probably will be no greater than$7,200, EPA
officials said.
But those businesses will still be liable for the entire $600-
million cleanup cost and run the risk of lawsuits from other
companies if they refuse to pay.
Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved
Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
CARWASHES—FINANCES POLLUTION.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS—
DISPOSAL LIABB.II'Y, SUPERFUND BUSINESS.ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to
retrieve otre.
News Go ite Index , Go
http://www.metahollywood.com/HONE/NEWS/FRONT/t000094967.htn 1 10/19/98
Health officials say public wins with closure of plant Page I of 2
community Home Page mWAR AutoAETcP m
o m9 stet amps,
Ouhld•Ony Gm,lr
Ma,hc
lch
Health officials say public wins with oh wda
closure of plant
REACTION: The Capistrano water district
didn't have the infrastructure to handle
some waste, so it was dumped in a field.
October 22, 1998
By MAYRAV SAAR
The Related story:
The Orange County Register
DANA POINT—Both sides
• Capistrano water
district cleared in
in asewage-drooping case dumping case
asserted victory Wednesday,
but county health officials
said the public is the real winner.
Orange County Superior Court Judge Michael
Brenner ordered the Capistrano Beach Water District
to shut down the Victoria Sewage Treatment Plant by
June 30, 1999, as part of a settlement of the dumping
case.
"I think that the main thing we were concerned with
was that untreated human sewage was being dumped
near a creek that goes to Doherty Beach," said Larry
Honeyboutme, program chief of the Orange County
Health Care Agency's water quality division.
He added that there was no evidence that any sewage
flowed into the creek.
Honeybourne played a crucial part in the district
attorney's investigation that led to the order to close
the plant: After water district employees blew the
whistle on their agency's repeated sewage dumping,
http://www.ocregister.com/community/capos22w.shtrnl 10/22/98
Health officials say public wins with closure of plant Page 2 of 2
Honeyboume secretly watched district vactor rocks
in May 1996 spew sludge in a field south of the
Victoria plant, and reported his findings to
prosecutors.
Sanitation districts rely on gravity to push sewage
from pipelines to treatment plants. When things like
hills get in the way, a vactor truck is used like a
vacuum to suck pooled sewage out of the lines,
Honeybotune said.
Normally, the trucks' contents are treated at a proper
facility, but the Capistrano district did not have the
infrastructure to handle that waste, so the district
dumped the untreated sludge, prosecutors said.
"The employees were offended by what they were
being ordered to do," Deputy District Attorney
Michelle Lyman said. "I felt (the ordered closure) was
pretty elegant. It should have been out of business
years ago."
Paul S. Meyer, attorney for the water district, said the
agency was not negligent. "This settlement permits us
to go back to the work of continuing to provide clean,
safe and reasonably priced service to our ratepayers."
Actually, the Capistrano district planned to close the
Victoria plant as part of a mandated merger of that
district, South Coast Water District and Dana Point
Sanitary District.
The county Board of Supervisors is expected to
approve the merger Nov. 10.
Staff writer Pat Brennan contributed to this report.
81 Mwepper m onnP Celnb.Ce L
Rupw
CWjAgM 1998 The OmWe County Reg er
Pbase emM eenments to oaanuterQlink heetlommm
http://www.ocregister.com/community/capos22w.shtn l 10/22/98
Capistrano water district cleared in dumping case Page 1 of 2
sftCCi1t111tIJiltlty/ icenous _ Baas errtra
Home Page p m AUI—.A ese
txroc.xer couxn eeemen
ocregisterxom
O.hida Bnrye CDVptr
B ,h.
Capistrano water district cleared in o "�;' ;,
dumping case
SETTLEMENT: But as part of an agreement
with the District Attorney's Office, its
treatment plant must close.
October22, 1999
By MAYRAV SAAR Related story:
The Orange County Register *+
. Health of olals say
DANA POINT—The public wins with
Capistrano Beach Water closure of plant
District was cleared
Wednesday of all criminal
charges in a 1996 sewage dumping case, but was
ordered to shut down its treatment plant.
In a settlement with the District Attorney's Office,
water district officials agreed to close the Victoria
Sewage Treatment Plant by June 30, 1999, and pay a
$75,000 fine for dumping untreated sewage in a field
near San Juan Creek in May 1996.
The district's liquid wastes will now be handled across
the creek at the South East Regional Reclamation
Authority plant, which already handles Capistrano's
solid wastes.
As part of the settlement, misdemeanor charges were
dropped against district General Manager Dennis
Emerson Mac-
Lain.
The district's chief plant operator, Steven Corey
http://www.ocregister.com/community/capo022w.shtml 10/22/98
Capistrano water district cleared in dumping case Page 2 of 2
Sanchez, pleaded guilty Oct. 13 to discharging
sewage, a misdemeanor. Wednesday, he was
sentenced to three years' probation and 200 hours of
physical community service.
The settlement comes one year after county
prosecuters filed 26 criminal charges, including 12
felony counts, against the district and Sanchez for
discharging liquid sludge from vactor trucks —used
to vacuum sewer lines — into the field.
"A thorough investigation by the district attorney did
not reveal any pollution of water," Paul Meyer,
attorney for the district, said Wednesday. "The district
did not admit liability or negligence by the
settlement."
-- - _ H rwspeper In a.npe ew^tY Cemems --
�nmam rase rn.aanpe coumy a�smar
Plano wrM wmmen4 to wiwibter(AI nk hootlom wm
http://www.ocregister.com/community/capo022w.shtn l 10/22/98
Boise Chica fight comes down to one last stand Page tot 4
ome age � m, F7317ccess c m'
fL THE OMNGE LOHNtt REGIAr0. t
ocregister.com - --- - -
Bolsa Chica fight comes down to rvy
one last stand
LAND USE: An environmental group's battle
with developers over a eucalyptus rove Technologydthrep"ift np
P YP 9 b�d�nd,ie rant
may be the final round in the dispute. Edge or Nature
El N&
Uk H
October 24, 1998 Oc.n N,
Our Universe
Savew
By OLIVIA HAWKINSON 11t=nk
The Orange County Register ------ •^ r=„s
From Huntington Beach n'-•----fig
s—
The leaves of the towering eucalyptus trees rustle in T7
the breeze. A red-tailed hawk peers down from its
perch atop a dead branch, and the whoops and
whistles of songbirds pierce the air. The only signs of
civilization are the sounds of distant bulldozers and
an occasional airplane.
The grove overlooks the Bolsa Chica wetlands from
an area known as the mesa, or upper grassland. It
shades a dusty trail popular with joggers, bicyclists
and dog walkers. The trees offer a rare roosting place
for raptors, or buds of prey, and a laundry list of other
birds.
This 6.5-acre string of trees may be the last stand in
the decades-long battle over development at Bolsa
Chica. An environmental group's appeal of two court
rulings supporting a 1,235-home development rests
on the trees, which are to be cut down.
The Bolsa Chica Land Trust argues that the grove's
environmental value was not adequately addressed
when Orange County approved the plan by California
Coastal Communities, formerly Koll Real Estate
Group, for the development called Warner Mesa—
the homes, a regional park and open space on 200
acres of the mesa.
The 4th District Court of Appeal in Santa Ana last
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/I 998/10/24/science/tree024w.shtml 10/28/98
Bolsa Chica fight comes down to one last stand Page t oI 4
week completed its hearing on the appeal and has
until Jan. 14 to decide. If the court denies the appeal,
development would probably start next year. If the
court rules in favor of the Land Trust, the developer
would have to come up with a new plan and return to
the Coastal Commission for a fourth time. The
commission first approved a plan for 5,700 homes
and a marina in 1986.
The company plans to chop down the 90-year-old
Australian trees and replace them with new trees on
the Huntington mesa, a narrow strip of grassland at
the other end of Bolsa Chica, according to
spokeswoman Lucy Dunn.
Trees that were once native to the area, such as
sycamores and oaks, would be planted there, and
"roosting poles"would provide birds with temporary
perches until the saplings reached maturity, Dunn
said.
"The (eucalyptus) trees are dying," said Dunn,
executive vice president of Hearthside Homes, a
subsidiary of the real estate company. "Under our
plan, we were going to (plant) native trees that will
survive and grow tall and allow for the trees to
become a good place to nest. Does it make sense to ...
keep a dying habitat?"
Those who stroll beneath the trees love the sanctuary
and the birds. Even the groups that fight over this land
speak with a shared reverence for the habitat.
Land Trust members have argued that not all the trees
are dying and say even the dead wood remains a
valuable perch for hawks, falcons, owls and other
birds. In 1982, the grove and the grassland and scrub
beneath were identified as a 20-acre environmentally
sensitive habitat area, or ESHA, by the state
Department of Fish and Game.
The birds roosting in the eucalyptus groves differ
from those in the wetlands nearby, said Connie
Boardman, a biology professor at Cerritos College
and a Land Trust member.
Approximately 20 species of raptors perch on the tall
trees to view their prey in extensive wetlands to the
south and in the mesa grassland to the north,
according to Tustin biologist Pete Bloom.
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/10/24/science/treeO24w.shtmi 10/28/98
Bolsa Chica fight comes down to one last stand rage i of 4
The raptors swoop down from the trees to hunt
gophers, mice and small birds in the wetland areas,
which are occupied by other buds, such as snowy
egrets and pelicans, Boardman said.
"It's wonderful to be able to walk 50 feet away from
the wetlands and see a completely different variety of
birds," she said of the eucalyptus grove.
One year ago, the Coastal Commission approved the
real estate company's plan to destroy and replace the
ESHA, and the San Diego County Superior Court
upheld that decision in December.
The grove is the only roosting spot for raptors in
northern Orange County, Bloom said. The county
environmental-impact report on the project said the
loss of the habitat was "not considered significant"
because the bird species that use it are common, or at
least not endangered.
Boardman said she counts all the dead wood as part
of the grove and the habitat should remain untouched,
even when trees die or fall.
"Even dead trees have use—buds of prey make use
of dead wood as hunting sites," Boardman said.
"Even if(the trees) don't look pretty to us,they're still
used and still important.
"The (replacement grove)that's planned up on the
Huntington mesa is pitiful," she said. "They're
planning to plant saplings, and it will take 20 or 30
years for those to grow. By then the birds will he
gone."
The grove would be replaced by a 5-mile nature trail
connecting with trails in Bolsa Chica State Ecological
Preserve, Dunn said.
The trees were planted as agricultural windbreaks by
employees of the Bolsa Chica Gun Club around the
turn of the century. Eucalyptus is native to Australia
and was brought to this country about 200 years ago,
said Bloom, an independent biologist and consultant
who focuses on raptors.
Eucalyptus trees in Irvine have reached 180 feet with
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/I998/10/24/science/tree024wshtml 10/28/98
Bolsa Chica tight comes down to one last stand Page 4 or 4
no help from arborists, he said. The younger Bolsa
Chica eucalyptus trees are 50 feet tall and offer the
tallest perches in the area, Bloom said.
"I certainly wouldn't describe them as healthy trees,
but they're perfect trees for raptors," he said.
The idea of replacement trees on the Huntington mesa
has some value, Bloom said, but there's nothing like a
mature grove of trees for birds to use for roosting,
nesting and hunting. The ultimate way to preserve the
local raptor population would be no mesa
development, period, he said.
'Us fair to say (cutting down the trees) is a disaster to
the local bird of prey population," he said.
Resident Danny Cullinana, who visits the grove four
or five days a week, said he loves the trees because
they give him the feeling of being out in the country.
Still, he understands the proposal to destroy them, he
said.
"I've seen one of those trees fall. The dead ones
would probably have to be cut down," said Cullinana,
a city resident for 37 years, who was walking his dog
on the path Thursday.
Rossmoor resident Diane Legros, who was taking
pictures of the raptors Thursday, said she'd rather see
the grove left wild than replaced by a walking trail
with a higher concentration of people.
"It's going to be really sad if they cut down the trees,
especially for the hawks," said Legos, who said she
has been coming to the grove daily since she
stumbled upon it a year and half ago. "The birds are
very shy. If the trees go down, the birds are going to
go "
1 newspaper n nge County, om, a
. ,1ftCytSf�t' .
CopYtl9h1 lla rlia Orange County Reglaler
Please sentl commends to oueaislen5llilu.lMEom.mm
http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/10/24/science/treeO24w.shtml 10/28/98
Les taps for historic water area Page l of
NUUUMTPLA
ovEE"CalSLfl ;.s soeruage ® users —iG (�
ter oematourrr ereisru k{3R .lr
OcretJil9ter.co 1 --
It's taps for historic water area
GOVERNMENT: Carpenter, O.C.'s last
irrigation district, will hand over operations
to IRWD.
October 29, 1998 etb�
By TERI SFORZA
The Orange County Register
Orange County's last irrigation district—which long
refused to dissolve even though its customers nearly
disappeared—will soon cease to exist.
The Civil War was a fresh wound and Ulysses S.
Grant was president when John and Alexander
Carpenter bought a swath of land south of Santiago
Creek in the 1870s. Precious water rights—to half
the creek's flow—came with it, and soon the
Carpenter Water Co. was bom.
It went public as the Carpenter Irrigation District in
1927, serviced 1,500 acres of lush farmland north of
Orange during World War II, then saw the county
turn largely concrete and its customer base dwindle to
a dozen.
Grand juries repeatedly called on Carpenter to
dissolve, but its directors refused. "There is history
around what goes on here," board member Amos R.L.
Deacon insisted in 1995. "We make a contribution."
But under an agreement approved last week,
Carpenter will cease to exist and the Irvine Ranch
Water District will take over its operations as of Dec.
31.
A "hostile takeover" attempt from neighboring
Serrano Water District prompted the board to start
talks with IRWD.
http://www.ocregister.com/politics/carp029w.shtml 10/30/98
It's taps for tustonc water area Page t 01 t
"They were going to take us over and basically take
our money," said board member Leif Brudevold.
IRWD gets Carpenter's 70 acres and $1 million in
reserves. It promises to employ Carpenter's manager
for two years; pay medical and other insurance for
Carpenter's 14 directors, retired directors and spouses;
and continue to provide cheap water to Carpenter's 12
customers until they die, or for 30 years, whichever
comes first. The reorganization saves about $83,000 a
year.
"And then," Brudevold said, "we just drift off into the
sunset."
1 newspaper in Me unty, r omu
Regtsf et' . .
Cspyripin 199a Toe Orar p County Register
Please aeno comments to aaea4ler®Onk.heetlom.mm
http://www.ocregister.com/politicstcarp029w.shtml 10/30/98
Water District I•med for Discharge to t-reeK
' ' ' tl " w- METRO HELP
nn
AS A MATTER OF FACT, WE DO
LKNOW THE WAY TO SAN JOSE. sr
tIMITE�
Wednesday, cto r 28, 1
Official Business/Courts and Governments
Water District Fined for Discharge to Creek
�J n an ongoing dispute that may lead to Ned m PA I ar
penalties of hundreds of thousands of >.. me genre
dollars,the Las Virgenes Municipal �,o;,`;I�
Water District has been fined for illegally
ADVERTISEMENT discharging treated water into Malibu Creek,state officials
® said.
Already facing a bill of more than$70,000 for releasing into
the creek 19.2 million gallons of treated water from its Tapia
Plant during September, district officials said this week they
would unavoidably commit even greater violations, because of
YElStI IOUS what they call unfair state restrictions.
g Expecting more fines,district officials said they will appeal
the penalties and argue for looser restrictions at a California
Regional Water Quality Control Board meeting scheduled for
Dec. 14.
y� The plant's permit, approved by the state board in April,
prohibits treated water from entering the creek from May to
November of every year to protect endangered species in the
Malibu Lagoon and limit the levels of human waste entering
the ocean, state officials said.
It requires the Las Virgenes district—which processes
sewage from residents of the San Fernando Valley's western
edge--to offer its highly treated water during that period to
government and private agencies for use in irrigating parks,
schools, golf courses and landfills.
District officials complain that complying with the new
restrictions is sometimes impossible--particularly in cool fall
weather,when there is little demand for irrigation water.
"We're trying,we're really trying," said Norm Buehring,
director of resource conservation for the Las Virgenes district.
Continued
Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
LAS VIRGINES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FINES WATER
POLLUTION—LOS ANGELES COUNTY,MALIBU CREEK.You will
not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
ew'F s — Tt e n ex —
http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWSIMETRO/t000097861.1.html 10/29/99
Water UISUICL rmCU lot UtSCaargC 10 LrCCK
rFTFwS-----_jGO n GO
METRO HELP=')
Get the latest browser and
email package. Free. rs
Wednesday, cto er 28, 1999
Water District Fined for Discharge to Creek(cont'd)
Previous Paee -Need.Vdo,or
wve 1peenerc
Handlingroughly 10 million gallons r •,"ry?SeIocl Ne
8 Y it per tonLf u.
day with limited reservoir capacity,the
ADVERTISEMENT district's storage capacity can be overwhelmed by the volume
of water it treats when its customers don'twant it, Buehring
said.
The number of residents whose sewage the district treats has
grown since 1988 by 10,000 to roughly 64,000, district
Savings officials said.
"We're trying to use what storage we have and have even
tried to offer no-cost water to public agencies to limit the
NextCard 77
number of days it would have to go into the creek," Buehring
Online Balance said.
Transfers. But,when the weather gets cold, "nobody is interested,"
Buehring said.
2.9% intro APR.
Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved
b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about:
LAS VIRGINES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FrNES WATER
POLLUTION—LOS ANGELES COUNTY,MALIBU CREEK. You will
not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
n eX _. _... GO
http://www.latimes.com/HOMEfNEWS/METR0/t000097861.2.html 10/28/98
News _.... C+" c;o Site.Index ? Go
r ORANGE COU NTY NENES HELPy.`
F?" �ii sew ii q
J',tZtxw
Wednesday, October 28, 1998
DANA PARSONS
Water District Gets the Drop on Killer Parasite
By DANA PARSONS
id you catch the NBC movie Sunday night about the
RELATED Ell potentially lethal parasite that tainted a town's water supply?
Me neither.
O.C.SECTIONS I probably should have, though, because rm leery of my tap
MAIN PAGE water. Some would say mine is an abnormal fear, but all I can say is
that when the faucet drips onto a dishrag, the rag turns brown. I
NEWS BY was no them whiz, but I don't recall that being one of water's
CONRAUN]TY qualities.
NBC touted the story line in "Thirst" as depicting a "public
SPORTS health hazard that leaves citizens a drop away from total
PREP SPORTS destruction."
That's exactly the kind of talk that Ron Wildennuth can't stand.
BUSINESS As a spokesman for the Orange County Water District,
Wildermuth's job is to assure customers that, when they take a
LIFE A STYLB drink of water, they will five to tell about it.
CALENDAR So, Wildermuth launched a preemptive strike the day before
"Thirst" aired. The release said Orange County's water does not—
CALENDAR repeat not—contain deadly parasites. "Current filtering processes
WEEKEND prevent any parasitic life forms from entering Orange County's
HOME DESIGN drinking water," he wrote.
My initial thought was that Wildermuth has too much time on
COMMENTARY his hands.
Later, it dawned on me we're nearing the 60th anniversary of
T.V.TIMES Orson Welles'Halloween radio broadcast of"The War of the
Worlds," in which he told listeners that Martians had invaded New
Jersey.
People panicked, especially in New Jersey. Clearly, we could
have used someone like Wfidennuth in 1938: "Martians Are Not
ADVERTISEMENT Attacking New Jersey, and If They Do They'll Be Sorry," his press
release might have said.
NBC spokeswoman Rebecca Marks said she wasn't aware of
I , any other water district in the country reacting as Orange County
http://www.latimes.convHOME/NEWS/0RANGFJt000097726.htm1 10/28/98
did.
r "It was a fictional account, it was entertainment," she said of the
movie. "It was rooted in some fact, and I think it probably played
into some people's fear about their drinking water. I have them, and
t • I I t t Pm a logical, intelligent human being, but because we don't know
about the filtering process, we all kind of get the heebie-jeebies
INTO111 over where our water is coming from and whether it's clean and
safe."
Not to worry, Wildermuth said.
"It was a pretty preposterous scenario in the movie," he said. "I
saw it. We were just cutting it off at the pass [with the release], in
case there was some kind of TV piece afterward, which I've seen
so many times, like, 7s Orange County's water safe?' "
The county gets its water from ground water sources and
imports from the Metropolitan Water District. When I asked if the
movie had any plausibility, Wildermuth said, "I don'tthink so. With
the system we have in Orange County, its just not going to
happen."
Confident his release did the trick, Wildermuth noted, "We did
not get any calls, by the way."
Ifis review of the movie: "It would be kind of neat if you didn't
know anything about water, but when you know something about
water, you start picking it apart."
The movie scored in one regard, he said: "All our water
engineers were ecstatic that the movie actually highlighted them,
for a change."
It turns out, however, the plot wasn't as far-fetched as
Wddermuth suggests. A parasite got into the Milwaukee water
system in 1993 and made more than 400,000 people sick,
according to newspaper accounts. A Milwaukee city health official
said as many as 100 deaths might have been attributable to the
contamination.
Just last summer in Sydney, Australia, residents emptied store
shelves of bottled water because of a reported contamination.
Closer to home, the Metropolitan Water District received a
patent this year to test for the contaminant mentioned in "Thirst."
In general, however,Marks concurred with Wildermuth's
reassuring tone.
The tone of"Thirst," she said, was reminiscent of"Asteroid,"
the two-part drama NBC aired in February 1997. That movie was a
"fun thriller with a tinge of reality" that was just real enough to
worry people,Marks said.
Apparently,NBC doesn't care if we're all paranoid.
I asked Marks if the network is through scaring us.
No, she said, there's a miniseries in production called "Atomic
Train." Look for it next spring.
That one, Marks said, "is in the vein of a runaway train, it's
carrying nuclear weapons, and it's coming our way."
Mr. Wildermuth and the citizens of Orange County, do not
panic.
http://www.latimes.com/HONM/NEWS/ORANGE/t000097726.html 10/28/98
water tstnct Vels the Ll UP Wl W1101 rarasae ...b.. .. e. ..
Let me say to you as calmly as possible:
Run for your lives.
Dana Parsons'column appears Wednesday, Friday and Sunday.
Readers may reach Parsons by calling(714)966-7821 or by writing
to him at the Times Orange County Edition, 1375 Sunflower Ave.,
Costa Mesa, CA 92626, or by e-mail to dana.parsons(alatimes.com
C YHzb[1998149 Angeles Taaea AR Rights Reserved
I Search the archives ofthe L,os Angeles antes for similar stories.You will
not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one.
http://www.latimes.com/HOMFJNEWS/ORANGEtt000097726.html 10/28/98
_...__
columnists Gmesaye m NxuuclrEne� m
ME GRANGE MUNIT REGISUR Irinlfr�
ocregister.com i1liirrWW.�1H�
oRtrwe Orange rORRty
Be,ahes
n
Bllewatah
gordon dillow ohitW Ei
Low flush toilet doesn't sit well with
plumber
October 29, 7998
When she saw the offer in her water bill, Bridget
Riley figured it was a pretty good deal. Her water
company said it would give her a brand-new "ultra
low flush" toilet. Absolutely free. All she had to do
was come down and pick it up.
Not that there was anything wrong with her old
porcelain facility. It was still providing the stout
yeoman service it always had. Still, it was more than
30 years old, and Bridget figured that maybe it was
time for a change.
So a couple of weeks ago, Bridget, 70, of Costa Mesa,
sent her son to the offices of the Mesa Consolidated
Water District to pick up her free toilet. And then she
asked a plumber she knows to install it.
But the plumber shook his head.
You don't want that ultra low flush toilet, he told her.
Not enough flushing power. You'll have to flush it
two, three times to get the job done. If you don't, it'll
clog your pipes.
Based on that advice, Bridget decided to send the new
toilet back. But it left her wondering.
"It just doesn't make any sense," Bridget says. "If
these new toilets cause all these problems, why are
they giving them to people?"
http://www.ocregister.com/community/dillow.shtml 10/30/98
Well, the simple answer is that it's the law.
See, in 1992 Congress passed a law requiring every
new residential toilet sold or installed in the U.S. to
use no more than 1.6 gallons of water per flush. Until
then, 3.5 gallons per flush was the usual standard. The
idea, of course, was to save water.
Unfortunately, there were a lot of complaints about
the new toilets not having enough 000mph to propel
their unmentionable cargos out of the house and on
their way to the treatment plant.
In fact, there've been reports of a black market
springing up for old-style, 3.5-gallon-per-flush toilets
that are smuggled in from Canada. And last year there
was an unsuccessful move in Congress to repeal the
1.6 gallon standard.
Nevertheless, about 25 million of the ultra low flush
toilets have been installed in American homes—
including virtually all homes in Orange County built
since 1992.
But according to the Municipal Water District of
Orange County, there are still an estimated 1.2
million old-style toilets in the county. And the water
district wants people to voluntarily trade in those old
toilets for new low flush ones.
So they've been offering discounts on the new toilets
and in some cases even giving them away. So far,
about 110,000 of the new toilets have been
distributed.
And Joe Berg, water use efficiency program manager
for the water district, says the new toilets work just
fine.
"A lot of the negativity(about the new toilets) comes
from the late-1980s, when they were being
developed," he says. "But the flush effect has been
greatly improved since then. Less than one-tenth of
one percent of our customers ever have a problem—
and if they do, we help them fix it."
Meanwhile, Berg says, the new toilets offer
tremendous water savings—about 10,500 gallons
http://www.ocregister.com/conimunity/dillow.shtml 10/30/98
per toilet per year.
I'm torn on this one. Yes, saving water is important.
But so is having confidence in your bathroom
fixtures.
Of course, maybe its a moot point. Because 1.6
gallons per flush is the law.
But if enough people decide that just isn't enough to
do the job, the law could be changed.
All we'd have to do is flush a few congressmen.
Gordon Dillow may be reached at(714)953-7953.
Si ners�in Umpe Courty.Cauomia
conyavm teas me on�ga cemnr Re9alar
Please ae�M cmnments to aaeaisle��ymk.freatlom.mm
http-.//www.ocregister.com/community/dillow.shtml 10/30/98
_0
2
Orange County Sanitation District
MINUTES
BOARD MEETING
October 28, 1998
�JN A ITgr�
� � O
� 9
o .a
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
OC9D.P.O.Box 9127•Fountain Valley,CA 927284127•(714(962-2411
v Minutes for Board Meeting
p 10/28/98
Page 2 of 7
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was
held on October 28, 1998, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's'Administrative Offices. Following the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum
present as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
X Bumie Dunlap, Chair Glenn Parker
X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller
X Steve Anderson John Holmberg
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X George Brown Shawn Boyd
X John Collins Laurann Cook
X Jan Debay John E. Noyes
X Barry Denes Richard A. Freschi
A Brian Donahue Harty Dotson
A Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
A John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner
X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater
A Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
X Eva Miner-Bradford Paul F. Walker
A Mark A. Murphy Joanne CAontz
X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan
X Margie Rice James V. Evans
A Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
A Christina Shea Barry Hammond
A William G. Steiner Todd Spitzer
ave Sullivan X Tom Hannan
D
X Chedes E. Sylvia Ron Bates
A Bob Zemel I Tom Daly
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant
General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin;
Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Peterman; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Chuck Winsor; Mike
Moore; Ryal Wheeler
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas Woodruff; Alternate Director Shawn Boyd; Adana Schafer
Minutes for Board Meeting v
10/28/98 a
Page 3 of 7
REPORT OF THE CHAIR
The Chair reminded the Directors that the Board of Directors' meetings would be held on
November le and December 160 due to the holidays, which is one week earlier than usual. It
was also noted that the FAHR Committee was not scheduled to meet in November and
January.
Chair Dunlap reported that the inauguration of the compressed natural gas station would be
held on October 30'". This project, which is a public1private partnership between the District,
Southern California Gas Company, South Coast Air quality Management District, Power
Systems Associates, Battelle and Pima Gro, is an excellent example of cooperation for the good
of all.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
September 23, 1998, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A",
"B", and "C', attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below:
08/31/98 1 09/16/98 1 09/30/98
Totals $3,013,736.27 1 $3,200,070.37 1 $2,074,950.67
CONSENT CALENDAR
9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to
execute a Quitclaim Deed for a 205 square foot parcel in Banning Avenue in the City of
Huntington Beach to Gary Gumbert, in a forth acceptable to General Counsel.
10. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from David
and Carol Day to annex 0.751 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Highcliff
Drive and Brier Lane in the unincorporated area of Cowan Heights (Annexation No.
OCSD-1 —Day Annexation); and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-47, authorizing
initiation of annexation of said territory to the District.
11. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-48,
ordering Annexation No. OCSD-2 - Portion of Tract No. 14185, in the vicinity of Santa
Ana Canyon Road and Country Hills Road in the City of Anaheim, to the District.
12. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-49,
ordering Annexation No. OCSD-3 - Deutsch Annexation, in the vicinity of Foothill
Boulevard and East Lemon Heights Drive in the unincorporated area of Orange County,
to the District.
Minutes for Board Meeting
y' 10/28/98
Page 4 of 7
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
14. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by
Director Peer Swan, Vice Chair of the Steering Committee, re the October 28, 1998
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
September 23, 1998 to be filed.
C. Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, gave a brief update regarding the
biosolids issue in Kern County.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Motion was amended authorizing
staff to continue negotiations for a Memorandum of Understanding between Kern
County and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) supporting:
(1) $2.12 per ton fee paid by OCSD for transported biosolids on impacted
roads; and,
(2) Prepayment of$750,000 to Kem County to be refunded via tonnage
credits over an approximate 5-10 year period.
15. DRAFr OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the October 14, 1998
meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 14, 1998 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Increase the Year 2000 Date
Change Budget Authorization from $500,000 to$2,141,500 for staff labor,
material, and outside service costs through June 30, 1999; and (2)Approve
Phase 2 of the Professional Services Agreement for Year 2000 Compliance
project management and documentation services with Bristol Systems, Inc. for
$160,000 for the period November 1998 to June 1999.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve an agreement with
Municipal Water District of Orange County(MWDOC) for a multi-agency Water
Use Efficiency Program and direct staff to participate in Programs 1 and 2 for an
amount not to exceed$150,000; and (2)Authorize staff to enter into a pilot
project with MWDOC for Program 3 in an amount not to exceed $33,000.
Minutes for Board Meeting
10/28/98 ,
Page 5 of 7
16. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal
report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of the Planning, Design, and
Construction Committee re the meeting held on October 8, 1998 summarizing the
actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered thje draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes
for the meeting held on October 8, 1998 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 6 to
Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire
Protection, Signage &Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage&Water Distribution
System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and Chemical and Plant
Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55 with Sverdrup Civil,
Inc. authorizing an addition of$101,202 and 59 calendar days, increasing the
total contract amount to 13,701,058.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 15 to
Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1,Job No. P1-36-2, with
Margate Construction authorizing a net addition amount of$122,912 and 38
calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$35,499,357.
e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services
Agreement with MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. for Improvements to
Existing Mechanical Systems, Job No. J-62,for an amount not to exceed
$154,760,
17. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re the meeting held on
October 21, 1998 summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 21, 1998 to be filed.
C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's
Report for the month of September 1998.
d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the base salaries for
the positions of Assistant General Manager, Director of Communications,
Director of Information Technology and Controller to be above the maximum of
the pay ranges.
Directors Tom Hannan and Margie Rice opposed.
Minutes for Board Meeting
j 10/28/98
Page 6 of 7
18. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve the plans and specifications
for Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-1, on
file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a
contract to Southern Contracting Company for Modifications to Electrical and Control
Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-1, for an amount not to exceed $1,271,000.
19. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Approve plans and specifications for
Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4, on file
at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file letter dated October 5, 1998,
from Valley Waterproofing, Inc., protesting the waterproofing applicator qualifications for
all bids; (3) Receive and file memorandum dated October 13, 1998, from General
Counsel; (4) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation rejecting all bids; and
(5) Authorize the General Manager to set the date for receipt of bids for Seismic Retrofit
of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44-4 (Rebid).
20. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Summons and
Complaint, Robert Burge, at al. v. Sanitation District of Orange County, at al., Orange
County Superior Court Case No. 800278, and authorize District's General Counsel to
appear and defend the interests of the District.
21. General Counsel reported a need for a closed session, as authorized by Government
Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957, to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item
Nos. 21(a)(1), (2), and (3). General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item
needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He
reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section
54954.2(b)(2), upon a two-thirds'vote of the Directors. No other items would be
discussed or acted upon.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE: That the
pending matter of litigation entitled Wal-Con Construction Co. v. County Sanitation
District No. 5 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 782457 be
added to the agenda as Item No.21(a)(4), for discussion.
CONVENE INCLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS
54956.9 AND 54957: The Board convened in dosed session at 7:18 p.m. pursuant to
Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957. Confidential Minutes of the Closed
Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with
California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board
Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed
Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 21(a)(1), (2)and (4).
Minutes for Board Meeting
10/28/98 y
Page 7 of 7
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 8:10 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular
session. The General Counsel reported that the Board of Directors adopted Resolution
No. OCSD 98-50, approving Amendment No. 2 to the General Manager's contract.
ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m.
Secretary of th oard of Dirg y rs of
Orange County Sanitation Di ict
H:\wp.dla%agendaX1998 Joint Board Minutes\702898.doo
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 8131/98
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
13650 The Vantage Group,Inc. $25,785.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
13651 Advance Constructors Inc. $107,897.00 Construction J-34-1,P2-35-5
13652 Blo Gro Division $25,735.28 Residuals Removal MO 4-2&95
13653 Boyle Engineering Corporation $25,557.10 Engineering Services 7-23
13554 Burch Ford $73,630.52 Vehicles Purchased-4-1998 Ford Taurus Sedans
13855 Carlyle Engineers $160,207.86 Engineering Services
136M Dell Marketing L.P. $33,333.01 9-Micro-computers&2 Printers for Divisions 510,520,490
13657 Glodich-Mitchell,Inc. $31,097.52 Pump Supplies
13658 James Martin&Co. $91,015.00 Data Integration Project
13659 Kemkon Pacific,Inc. $83.772.59 Fordo Chloride MO 9.27-95
13660 Margate Construction Inc. $168,851.96 Construction Pl-36-2
13661 Pima Go Systems Inc $154,592.05 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95
13662 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. $61,488.16 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94
13663 Southern California Edison $71.882.12 Power
13664 Tule RanchlMagan Farms $48.912.98 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95
13655 Western Slates Chemical Inc. $36,720.90 Caustic Sods Solution MID&23-95
13666 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart $72,659.71 Legal Services MO 7.26-95
13657 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $1.164.804.43 Construction 7-7-1
13668 Systems Integrated $31,500.00 Professional Services-J-31-3
13669 Advanced Cooling Technologies $196.54 Electric Pads
13670 Air Products and Chemicals $23.289.96 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen System MO 8-8-89
13671 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. $3,254.05 Manhole Frames&Covers
13672 Allied Supply $4,786.37 Plumbing Supplies
13673 Almega Environmental&Technical $320.00 Emissions Source Testing of Combustion&Portable Engines
r13674 American Sigma,Inc. $4.006.87 Instrumentation Pads&Supplies
13675 American Training Resources,Inc. $1,074.81 Training Materials
13676 Blake Anderson $168.97 Meeting Expense Reimb
13677 Anicom,Inc. $684.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies
13678 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $930.00 Service Agreement
13679 Appleone Employment Service $9.253.60 Temporary Employment Services
13680 Applied Industrial Technology $2,643.95 Pump Supplies
13681 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $8.800.00 Lab Supplies
13682 Atlantic Pool Care $401.79 Service Agreement
13683 Audio Video Reporting Services $37.33 Audiot ipe from Radio Show re:New Sewer Rates
13684 ACWA $90.00 1999 Salary Survey
13685 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. $10,500.00 Professional Services- Flaw Monitoring Project
13686 AKM Consulting Engineers $6.296.58 Professional Services-Contracts 11-17-3
13687 AM Best Co. $86.95 Subscription
13685 American Seals West $16.17 Gaskets
13689 ARMA international $100.00 Membership
13690 AWSI $96.98 D.O.T.Training Program
13691 Banana Blueprint,Inc. 54,491.25 Printing MO 11-7-94
13692 Battery Specialties $960.51 Batteries
13693 BloMedeux Vitek,Inc. $1.832.51 Lab Supplies
13694 Bristol Systems,Inc. $3.200.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
13695 Bureau of National Affairs $1,648.58 Subscription
13696 Burke Engineering Co. $102.37 Electrical Supplies
13897 BNI Building News $525,51 Subscription
136M California Automatic Gate $1,17840 Maintenance Agreement-9 Automatic Gales Pi &P2
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 81
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
13699 California Environmental $25.00 Training Registration
13700 Callan Associates,Inc. $3.550.00 Investment Advisor
13701 Centrepointe Commercial Interior $958.98 Office Furniture
13702 Cale-Parmer Instrument Company $149.53 Lab Supplies
13703 Communication Briefings $79.00 Subscription
13704 Compuserve Incorporated $110.89 Computer Services
13705 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $2,468.99 Electrical Supplies
13706 Contmental-McLaughlin $498.75 Tools
13707 Control Switch $111.63 Electrical Supplies
13708 Convey Development 5304.00 Software License Renewal for 1099 Reporting
13709 Cooper Cameron Corporation $412.01 Engine Supplies
13710 Coral Magazine $24.95 Technical Journal
13711 Corporate Express $4,846.89 Office Supplies
13712 County of Orange $7,56TS4 Underground Tank Fee
13713 CH2MHill $20.000.00 Engineering Services J-31
13714 Daniels Tie Service, $1.550.87 Truck Tires
13715 Dexon Computer,Inc. $895.00 VAX Computer Workstation Hardware
13716 Dun 8 Bradstreet Corp.Foundation $1g8.00 Training Registration
13717 DGA Consultants,Inc. $5.184.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
13718 Electra Bond,Inc. $161.63 Mechanical Supplies
73719 James M.Eta $175.00 Cash Advance-Training Expense
V 13720 Enchanter,Inc. $2.800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
13721 Enedech $26.50 Freight Charges
rt 13722 Enterprise Technologies $11.399.20 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation
yj 13723 Experian $267.51 Orange County Property Information
13724 Federal Express Corp. $82.00 Air Freight
13725 Federal Express Corp. $48.50 Air Freight
13726 Fibedron $801.42 Fiber Optic Cable
13727 Filter Supply Company $5.067.53 Fibers
13725 Finnigan Corp $147.39 Service Agreement
13729 Fisher Scientific $1,222.10 Lab Supplies
13730 Fluid Tech.A Div.of FLW Ina $500.50 Instrument Supplies
13731 Fodls Benefit.Insurance Company $17.610.31 Long Term Disability Premium
13732 Fountain Valley Florist $86.83 Employee Bereavement Flowers
13733 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc $525.31 Paint Supplies
13734 Franklin Covey $40.90 Office Supplies
13735 Frys Electronics $559.88 Employee Computer Loan Program
13736 So.Cal.Gas Company $15.101.29 Natural Gas
13737 General Petroleum $8,277.91 Unleaded Gasoline
13738 GTE California $337.16 Telephone Services
13739 YWV Grainger Inc $160.82 Compressor Supplies
13740 Greseby STI $390.03 Engine Supplies
13741 Great American Printing Co. $8.545.91 Printing
13742 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $835.75 Janitorial Supplies
13743 GST,Inc./Micro City $511.46 Office Supplies
13744 GTE $86.41 Telephone Services
13745 GTE $110.00 Telephone Services
13746 Harold Primrose Ice $40.00 Ice For Samples
13747 Hoerbiger Service Inc. $1,890.90 Compressor Pads
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid W1198
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
13748 The Holman Group $746.92 Employee Assistance Program Premium
13749 Home Depot $759.69 Small Hardware
13750 Hub Auto Supply $276.18 Truck Pads
13751 City of Huntington Beach $1,440.00 Water Use
13752 City of Huntington Beach $16.013.52 Witter Use
13753 HI Standard Automotive $1,649.64 Truck Paris
13754 Idexx $841.08 Lab Pads&Supplies
13755 Imaging Pubs,Inc. $223.60 Office Supplies
13756 Information For Public Affairs $165.00 Training Expense-Video
13757 Inland Empire Equipment,Inc $2.740.61 Truck Supplies
13758 Intelligence Press,Inc. $245.00 Subscription
13759 Intuitive Technology Corporation $5,000.00 Seruice Agreement
13760 Irvine Ranch Water District $198.20 Water Use
13761 ICMA $141.00 Subscription
13762 IDM Controls Inc. $197.82 Equipment Repair
13763 IPCO Safety-Ca $1.663.52 Safety Supplies
13764 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $558.73 Instrument Supplies
13765 Jamison Engineering,Inc $998.00 Equipment Rental
13766 Jay's Catering $50.00 Directors Meeting Expense
13767 Johnstone Supply $121 AS Electrical Supplies
13768 MC do MISCO Southwest $12,786.69 Mechanical Paris It Supplies
13769 Killer Training Centers $2,985.00 Training Registration
Y. 13770 Knox Industrial Supplies $5,979.W Tools
R 13771 Laborers Inc. $22,000.00 Lab Information Man
agement System Software MO 2-26-97
13772 Lasaigraphics $431.01 Computer Software
W 13773 LaserAll Corp. 52,146.78 Service Agreement
13774 Leadership Directories $434.95 Subscription
13775 League Of California Cities $540.00 Conference Registration
13776 Lee&No Inc. $5,683.45 Engineering Services
13777 Liquid Handling Systems $159.81 Mechanical Supplies
13778 LA Cellular Telephone Company $1,884.38 Cellular Telephone Service
13779 M&D Machining $770.00 General Electric,A/C Gear Box Supplies
13780 Mar Vac Electronics $16.21 Instrument Supplies
13781 McKenna Engineering&Equipment $285.26 Pump Supplies
13782 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $752.44 Tools
13783 Medlin Controls Co. $237.72 instrument Supplies
13794 MicroAge Computer $9,375.99 Software
13785 Mdway Mfg&Machining Co. $8,639.37 Mechanical Repairs
13786 Mission Uniform Service $3.251.59 Uniform Rentals
13787 Mitsubishi Wireless $100.52 Cellular Telephone Batteries
13788 Michael D.Moore $498.80 Meeting Expense Reimb
13789 MoloPholo $40.19 Photographic Services
13790 MBC Applied Enviraamental Science 54,173.00 Vessel Support for Ocean Monitoring Program
13791 MPS Photographic Services $260.25 Office Supplies
13792 National Plant Services,Inc. $16,975.00 Vacuum Truck Services
13793 National Technology Transfer $18,405.00 Training Registration
13794 Network Catalyst $1,000.00 Computer Supplies
13795 Newark Electronics $751.80 Instrument Suppress
13796 City of Newport Beach $71.76 Water Use
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 8131/98
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
13797 North American Crane Bureau $2.480.00 Training Registration 8 Certification Fees
13798 Occupational Vision Services $471.03 Safety Glasses
13799 Office Depot Business Services $2,085.04 Office Supplies
138M Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. $5,298.00 Temporary Employment Services
13801 Orange Coast Pipe Supply $16.67 Plumbing Supplies
13802 Orange County Forum $45.00 Conference Registration
13803 Orange County Wholesale Electric $28.55 Instrument Supplies
13804 Orange VaNe 8 Filing Company $2,700.48 Fillings
13805 Drift Fire Protection $833.00 Service Agreement
13806 Oxygen Service Company $282.00 Specialty Gases
13807 Pacific Bell $1,28381 Telephone Services
13008 Pacific Bell Internet Services $1,151.50 Internet Services
13809 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2.108.55 Plumbing Supplies
13810 Parts Unlimited $327.48 Track Supplies
13811 Patriot Video Productions $344.49 Video Taping Services
13812 Pemiaseal $407.98 Lube Oil
13813 Predate $1,595.00 Computer Software
13814 Pumping Solutions Inc. $162.26 Mechanical Supplies
13815 R 8 R Instrumentation,Inc. $1,069.19 Electrical Supplies
13816 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2.157.61 Trash Removal
13817 Randolph Austin Co. $639.76 Lab Supplies
13818 Restek Corporation $276.90 Training Registration
13819 Robinson Fertilizer Co.,Inc $3.110.38 Groundskeeping Supplies
13820 Rupes-Kennedy Hydraulic, $415.92 Pump
P13821 R IN Group.Inc. $6,000.00 CMMS Consulting Services
13822 RPM Electric Motors $535.63 Electric Motor Supplies
13823 Sancon Engineering.Inc. $9,212.50 Engineering Services
131124 Saratoga Institute $1.197.25 Human Resources Financial Report 1998
13825 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. $736,42 Specialty Gases
13826 Sea Water Vlsione $814.59 Chiller
13827 Second-Sun $519.49 Light Fixtures
13828 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $447.24 Tools
138N Shureluck Sales B Engineering $2,363.25 Tools/Hardware
13830 Siemon,Larsen 8 Marsh $1.000.00 Professional Services
13831 Sigma-Aftich,Inc. $250.30 Lab Supplies
13832 Skater,Inc. $170.12 Pump Supplies
13833 Smith Pipe 8 Supply Inc. $808.43 Plumbing Supplies
13834 South Coast Water $366.96 Office Supplies
13935 Southern California Edison Co. $3,060.16 Power
13836 Southern California Water $61.03 Water Use
13837 Sparklefis $2.128.44 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
13838 Sprint $30.45 Lang Distance Telephone Service
13539 SlateNel $330.00 Seminar Registration
13840 Sterling Art $65.19 Art Supplies
13841 Steven Enterprises,Inc. $920.14 Management Agreement
13842 Summit Steel $1,113.54 Metal
13843 Sunset Ford $148.00 Truck Supplies
13844 Super Chem Corporation $336.78 Chemicals
13845 Swains Electric Motor Service $304.65 Pump
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 8131MS
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
13US T a C Industrial Controls,Inc $1,663.31 Electrical Supplies
13847 Technic Computer Service Corp. $202.88 Printer Maintenance
13848 Think Earth Environmental Education $7,000.00 Membership
13849 ThirdWave $850.00 Document Management Project Consultant
13850 Thomas Gray 8 Assoc. $432.00 Lab Services
13851 Thomas M.Dawes,P.E. $6.120.00 Professional Services MO 4-23-97
13852 Thompson Industrial Supply $2,809,66 Mechanical Supplies
13853 Robert Tighe $4,800,00 Relocation Expense Project#541-1
13854 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service $344,20 Locks 8 Keys
13855 Edward M.Tones $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting Expense
13856 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River $45.00 Seminar Registration
13857 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. $4.260.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11.94
13858 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $381,08 Truck Supplies
13859 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $854 10 Lab Services
13960 Tustin Dodge $79,65 Truck Supplies
13MI Tuthill Carp $427.85 Valve
13862 US FIIIeriPolymetrics,Inc. $2.525.50 Lab Supplies
13863 USC $25.00 SCEC Ouarledy Newsletter
13864 Valley Cities Supply Company $2,975.57 Plumbing Supplies
1*1 13865 Veme's Plumbing $17.850,00 Plumbing Supplies
rS 13066 Village Nurseries $63.26 Landscaping Supplies
13867 Vision Service Plan-(CA) $7.511.70 Vision Service Premium
13868 Vortex Corp. $424,02 Service Agreement-Repair Roll-Up Door
rt 13869 VWR Scientific Products $7,483.05 Lab Supplies
> 1387D Weather and Wind Instrument Co. 5429.98 Wind Sods Frame
to 13871 Wileg Scientific $496,63 Lab Supplies
13872 WyaO Data Services $269.00 1998-99 ECS Geographic Report
13873 Xerox Corporation $12.230,92 Copier Leases
13874 Kirk%pedex Paper 8 Graphics $201.43 Photo Coping Service
13875 Douglas M. Stewart $755.00 Meeting Expense Reimb
13876 John W.Swindler $784.88 Meeting Expense Reimb
13877 Jean E.Tappan $148,50 Reimburse Director Room Charges
13876 Michelle Tuchman 521.90 Cellular Phone Charges
13879 Layne T.BaroMl $520.88 Meeting Expense Reimb
13880 Mark Castillo $1.056.22 Training Expense Reimb
13881 James E.Colston $294.78 Meeting Expense Reimb
13582 Kevin L.Hadden $692.42 Mewling Expense Reimb
13853 Orange County Sanitation Dist. $1,217.92 Petty Cash Reimb.
138M Space Leasing Company $19.618,90 Construction Trailers P240
13885 Yo-U Tsai $2,551.25 Computer Loan
7,013,736.27
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 9/16198
Cho&No. Vendor Amount Description
13910 Dell Marketing L.P. 878,615.00 3-Dell Network Servers-Div.930
13911 Delta Dental $39,072.80 Dental Insurance Plan
13912 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $64,559.66 Natural Gas-Spec AP-170
13913 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan $25,358.56 Medical Insurance Premium
13914 Kemiron Pacific.Inc. $51,924.10 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
13915 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. $555,915.69 Construction 3.38J,2-R-97
13916 Nat West Markets $68,121.69 COP Letter of Credit Fees
13917 NCCI Enterprises.Inc. $48,156.03 Construction Contract 9240
13918 Oracle Corporation $32.303.45 Computer Software-Full Enterprise Edition License
13919 Paciltcere of Ca $43.317.25 Health Insurance Premium
13920 Remedy $28.598.41 Temporary Employment Services
13921 Southern California Edison $45.217.63 Power
13922 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms &33,060.57 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95
13923 United HealthCare/More Health $133,184.75 Medical Health Insurance
13924 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $35.810.46 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C444
13925 Advance Constructors Inc. $219.455.10 Construction J-34-1,P2-35-5
13926 Fleming Engineering,Inc. $46,728.33 Sewer Repair MO 6-24-98
13927 County of Orange 546.344.81 Sewer Service Fees
13928 Irvine Ranch Water District $752.807.04 Transfer Connection Fees
yr 13929 American Telephone&Telegraph $2,620.08 Long Distance Telephone Services
�F 13930 Amercan Telephone&Telegraph E3.00 Long Distance Telephone Services
r 1393/ Adamson Industries 5200.08 Lab Supplies -
. 13932 Air Cold Supply 8%.26 Ab Conditioner Repairs
rT 13933 Airborne Express 618.45 Air Freight
pr 13934 Allied Packing&Rubber Inc. SSD7.13 Mechanical Supplies
�+ 13935 Allied Supply $214.50 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
13936 American Aidines $6.368.01 Travel Services
13937 Anicem,Inc. $2.505.00 Electrical Parts&Supplies
13938 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control
13939 Apce Valve And Primer $8.544.58 Plumbing Supplies
13940 Appleoms Employment Service $969.17 Temporary Employment Services
13941 Applied Industrial Technology 82,24&43 Pump Supplies
13942 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $1.600.00 Lab Supplies
13943 Armor-Vac $3.370.00 Vacuum Truck Services
13944 Atlas Chrysler Plymouth $18,273.32 1998 Dodge Ram Tmtic
13945 Auto Shop Equipment Co.,Inc. $330.78 Filters
13946 Azalea Software,Inc. E604.00 Soft are
13947 AMAI/Padgett-Thompson $834.00 Training Expense
13948 American National Standards ANSI $32.00 Publications
13949 Assoc of Metro.Sewerage Agencies $10.00 Training Registration
13950 APEX Communications $8,30129 Equipment Installation-Employee Card Readers
13951 ARB/PERP $100.00 Registration Fees fort Portable Engines
13952 AWWA Annual Conference 5430.D0 Subscription
13953 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $1,301.52 Printing MO 11-7-94
13964 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $5.555.17 Telephone Installation
13955 Battelle-Northwest 52,023.47 Solids Impact Meeting
13956 Baudville $110.36 Flames
13957 BloMerieux Work,Inc. 668.02 Lab Supplies
13958 BicSource Consulting $14.993.90 Consulting Service-Biosolids&Watershed
Orange County Sanitation District a
Claims Paid 9116190
Check No. Vender Amount Description
13959 Birmingham Controls $350.73 Mechanical Pads S Supplies
13960 Boyle Engineering Corporation $2.496.96 Engineering Services 7-23
13961 Bristol Systems,Inc. $9.000.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
13982 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $900.00 Janitorial Servlcas MO 1.12-94
13953 Buroh Ford $18,407.63 1998 Ford Taurus
13964 Burlington Safely Laboratory $468.00 Testing Services
13965 Bush&Associates Inc. $932.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
13966 California NGV Coalition $500.00 Membership
13967 Calolymplc Safety $6.026.08 Safely Supplies
13968 Carleton Engineers B Consultants $2.460.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality
13969 Carollo Engineers $7,443.49 Engineering Services-P1-38,P243,MO 4.14-93
13970 Cashion,Inc. $815.92 Valve Supplies
13971 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors $2.234.36 Office Furniture
13972 Codified Labs $1,018.35 Lab Supplies
13973 Charles P.Crowley Co. $453.39 Instrument Pads
13974 Chrome Crankshaft Co. $794.00 Pump Supplies
13975 Clean Source $200.42 Janitorial Supplies
13976 Coast Fire Equipment $5.091.90 Service Agreement
13977 Communications Performance Group $9.090.00 Professional Services
13978 Computers America,Inc. $4.639.86 Computer Supplies
13979 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $5,385.97 Electrical Supplies
13980 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. $176.71 Plumbing Supplies
13981 Contlnental-McLaughlin $48.00 Tools
hf 13982 Converse Consultants $1.227.80 Consulting Services MO 8.11-93
l 13983 Cooper Cameron Corporation $1,911.18 Engine Supplies
13984 Corporate Expresa $5.983.93 Office Supplies
13985 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. $3,289.07 Mechanical Supplies
13986 The Cri Odet Company $884.00 Training Expense
13987 Culligan Water Conditioning $30.00 Soft Water Service
13988 CH2MHIII $14,336.06 Engineering Services J-31
13989 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection $8.600.40 Lab Supplies
13990 CR 8 R Incorporated $6.300.00 Container Rentals
13991 Dapper Tire Co. $216.47 Track Tires
13992 Dal Mar Analytical $2,394.00 Siosolids Analysis
13993 Dosed Computer,Inc. $8.255.00 Computer Workstation&License Documentation
13994 DeZurick $2223.96 Valves
13995 Dan Maurer $2,345.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program
13996 Dun 8 Bradstreet Corp.Foundation $495.00 Training Registration
13997 Duthie Generator Service,Inc. $6.605.00 Generator Supplies
13998 Electra Bond,Inc. $888.94 Mechanical Supplies
13999 Embareadero Technologies,Inc. $6.458.06 5-User License DB Artisan for Oracle Software
14000 Enchanter,Inc. $4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
14001 Enterprise Technologies $3.680.00 Consulting Services-CMMS Implementation
14002 Environmental Resources Association $920.20 Lab Services
14003 Environmental Sampling Supply $342.05 Lab Supplies
14004 ENS Resources,Inc. $4.982.23 Professional Services
14005 Federal Express Corp. $92.70 Air Freight
14006 Fibermn $665.04 Fiber Optic Cable
14007 FileNet Corporation $24,851.98 Computer Software-ION Desktop 2.X,Doe Services Oracle,Annual Mainlenance Agreement
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 9116M
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
14008 Finnigan Corp $144.21 Service Agreement
14009 Fisher Scientific $656.08 Lab Supplies
14010 Flo,System,Inc. $18.351.71 Pump Supplies
14011 Fountain Valley Camara $57.11 Photo Supplies
14012 City of Fountain Valley $14,355.60 Water Use
14013 Franklin Covey $389.67 GBka Supplies
14014 Frazee Paint and Wascovedlg $390.06 Palm Supplies
14015 Frost Engineering Service Co. $1.303.48 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
14016 Frys Electronics $60.23 Employee Computer Loan Program
14017 FM International,Inc. $7,075.00 RFP for the Engineering Document Management System
14018 Ganahl Lumber Company $220.78 Lumber/Hardware
14019 Garralt-Callahan Company $5.037.31 Chemicals
14020 GTE California $3,500.49 Telephone Services
14021 Goldennest Window Service $1.798.00 Window Cleaning Service
14022 Great American Printing Co. $447.613 Printing
14023 Great Westem Sanitary Supplies $729.38 Janitorial Supplies
14024 GST,Inc.I Micro City $3.216.66 Office Supplies
14025 GTE $93.52 Telephone Services
14026 Haaker Equipment Company $366.31 Truck Supplies
14027 Harald Primrose Ice $96.00 Ice For Samples
14028 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli $153.40 Director's Meeting Expense
H. 14029 HI-Tek Timedock Company $143.02 Repair&Maintenance Service-Stromberg Daleffime Stamper
ittl 14030 Haerbiger Service Inc. $797.72 Compressor Parts
I 14031 Home Depot $278.67 Small Hardware
u 14032 Hopkins Technical Products $1.068.76 Mechanical Pads&Supplies
14033 Hub Auto Supply $79.88 Truck Pans
14034 Imaging Plus,Inc. $575.55 OMIca Supplies
14035 Industrial Air Compressor $426.43 Mechanical Pans&Supplies
14036 Infonnallon Resources $1atim Personnel Services
14037 Interstate Battery Systems $656.63 Batteries
14038 Ipswltch Inc. $155.00 Computer Software-4 each of WS-FTP Pro 5.D
14039 Irvine Photo Graphics $13.38 Photographic Servlcas
14040 Irvine Ranch Water District $3.64 Water Use
14041 IBM Corporation $284.75 Service Contract
14042 IBM Corporation $12,353.24 Lease Payment on the AS400
14043 IPCO Safely-Ca $14,426.70 Safety Supplies
14044 ISA Publications $577.00 Subscription
14045 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $3.982.54 Equipment Rental
14D46 Jay's Catering $225.01 Director's Meeting Expense
14047 Johnstone Supply $1,162.34 Electrical Supplies
14048 Frances L.Kaluzny $1.500.00 Consulting Service-Human Resources
14049 Knox Industrial Supplies $3.196.56 Tools
14050 Larkin Inc. $298.50 Service-Recertify Refrigerant Recovery Cylinders
14051 LaserAll Corp. $285.18 Service Agreement
14052 LeMOMe Company $148.27 Sulfide Teal Kit
14053 Lessons in Leadership $445.00 Seminar Registration
14054 Lexis-Neils $724.37 Subscription
14055 LA Cellular Telephone Company $840.74 Cellular Telephone Service
14056 Mag Systems $859.05 Electrical Supplies
Orange County Sanitation District u
Claims Paid 9116198
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
14057 Maintenance Technology Corp. $701.75 Welding Supplies
14058 Mandic Motors $46.00 Towing Services
14059 Mar Vac Ehrcronic5 $1.518.70 Instrument Supplies
14060 Mad Chlor Inc. $1.482.82 Ferric Chloride Supplies
14061 Mc Junkin Corp $724.08 Plumbing Supplies
14062 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. $2.841.69 Tools
14063 Measurement Variables,Inc. $782.50 Fillers
14064 MlcmAge Computer $3,406.52 Software
14065 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. $4.309.13 Mechanical Repairs
14066 Mission Uniform Service $3,154.15 Uniform Rentals
14D67 Mitchell Repair Information Co. $354.50 Subscription
14D68 Monitor Labs,Inc. $978.93 Instruments
14069 The Minster Board $175.00 Job Posting on the Internet
14070 Montgomery Watson $1.379.75 Air Toxica Project MO 12-12-90
14071 Moreland&Associates $19.176.25 Auditing Services MO 3.8.95
14072 MPS Photographic Services $19.94 Office Supplies
14073 N.Glanta&Son $813.85 Tools
14074 National Microcemp Services 52,045.00 Service Agreement
14075 National Plant Services,Inc. $3,475.00 Vacuum Truck Services
74076 National Research Council Canada $325.60 Subscription
14077 National Seminars Group $199.00 Seminar Registration
14078 National Technology Transfer $2.955.00 Training Registration
14079 Neal Supply Co. $1.638.88 Plumbing Supplies
14080 Network Catalyst $2,994.37 Computer Supplies
cej 14081 New Horizons Computer Learning $1.590.00 Software Training Classes
'P 14082 Nextel Communications $5.108.58 Cellular Phones&Air Time
14083 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. $19,874.10 LubritsmUDiesel Fuel
14084 The Norco Companies $111.00 Mail Delivery Service
14085 NAB Associates,Inc. $4,417.75 Service Agreement-1998 Regional Monitoring Program
14086 O.C.Council of Government $25.00 Meeting Expense
14087 Occupational Vision Services $349.09 Safety Glasses
14088 Office Depot Business Services $1.249.19 Office Supplies
14089 Office Pavillion $841.50 Office Furniture Repairs
14090 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. $960.00 Temporary Employment Services
14091 Olympic Creations $1.581.20 OCSD logo pins
14D92 Operation Technology,Inc. $11.391.25 Computer Software
14093 Orange County Sanitation District $0.41 Petty Cash Reimb.
14094 Orange County Water Distnc $7.010.00 Toilet Exchange Program
14095 Orange County Wholesale Electric $4.665.07 Instrument Supplies
14096 Orange Valve&Fitting Company $22.09 Fittings
14097 Oxygen Service Company $1.886.64 Specialty Gases
14098 OCB Reprographics $2.175.93 Blueprinting&Photocopying Service-Spec.4P-173
14099 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. $7,734.41 Electrical Supplies
14100 Pacific Bell $1.151.50 Telephone Services
14101 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2,774.61 Plumbing Supplies
14102 Pacific Pads and Controls $13.925.83 Instrument Supplies
14103 Padgett-Thompson $710.00 Seminar Registration
14104 Padre Janitorial Supplies $214.97 Janitorial Supplies
14105 Pagenel $3,69BA6 Rental Equipment
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 9116/96
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
14106 Parallax Education $50.00 Training Expense
14107 Parkhouse Tire Inc. $1,929.36 Time
14108 Pads Unlimited $568.38 Truck Supplies
14109 Petco Animal Supplies $47.35 Lab Supplies
14110 Pima Gro Systems Inc. $20,125.62 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.96
14111 Presidium Inc. $4,166.66 Workers Comp.Claims Admin.
14112 Pumping Solutions Inc. $75.03 Mechanical Supplies
14113 Putimeisler,Inc. $800.64 Pump Supplies
14114 Quantena.Inc. $1,650.00 Analytical Service
14115 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2,157.61 Trash Removal
14116 Realtime Systems Corporation $4,085.00 Integration&Support Services
14117 Reliastar $15,248.44 Life Insurance Premium
14118 Robedo's Auto Trim Shop $221.94 Auto Repair
14119 Ronan Engineering Co. $172.32 Electrical Pads&Supplies
14120 Rosen's Electrical Equipment $400.00 Electrical Supplies
14121 Ryan Herco Products Corp. $1.047.48 Metal
14122 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc, $9g5.00 Engineering Services
14123 Santa Ana River Flood Protection $1,400.00 Membership
14124 Schwing America,Inc. $66.63 Pump Supplies
14125 Scott,Reilly&Whitehead $64.75 Legal Services-Personnel Issues
14126 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. $218.00 Lab Repairs
14127 Seagate Software $8.000.00 Training Fee
M 14128 City of Seal Beach $110.48 Water Use
m 14129 Second-Sun $2.621.76 Light Fixtures
l - 14130 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc $91.20 Tools
14131 Shimadiu Scientific Instrument $104.52 Lab Supplies
14132 Shuraluck Sales&Engineering $2,446.78 Tools/Hardware
14133 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh $3.000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
14134 Skafloath Seminars $99.00 On-Site Training
14135 Sludge Newsletter $409.00 Subscription
14136 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc $80.11 Plumbing Supplies
14137 So.Cal.Gas Company $6,617.33 Natural Gas
14138 South Coast Air Duality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees
14139 South Coast Air Duality Mngt. $152.10 Permit Fees
14140 South Coast Air Duality Mngt. $9.746.40 Permit Fees
14141 South Coast Air Duality Mngt. $11.892.00 Permit Fees
14142 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $4.038.80 Permit Fees
14143 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees
14144 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees
14145 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees
14146 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees
14147 Southern California Edison $7.128.87 Power
14148 Southern California Marine Institute $1.560.00 Rental Equipment
14149 Sparkletts $2,280.33 Drinking Waler/Cooler Rentals
14150 Standard Supply&Equipment Co. $46.80 Pump Supplies
14161 State Chemical Mfg.Co. $700.00 Janitorial Supplies
14152 Steven Enterprises,Inc. $47.26 Management Agreement
14153 Strata International,Inc. $926.98 Chemicals
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 9116198
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
14154 Summit Steel $370.22 Metal
14155 Sun-Batt Landscape&Maintenance $4.420.00 Landscape Maintenance
14156 Sunset Ford $200.15 Truck Supplies
14157 Swains Electric Motor Service $487.36 Pump
14158 SETAC $600.00 Subscription
14159 The Register $810.95 Notices&Ads
14160 Thompson Industrial Supply $605.54 Mechanical Supplies
14161 Time Warner Communications $40.47 Cable Services
14162 Aamfund Financial/Top Hal Productions $96.65 Directors Meeting Expense
14163 T&Stale Seminar On-me-River $40.OD Seminar Regislralion
14164 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. $7.770.00 Contract Groundskeeping M05.11-94
14165 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. $53.82 Truck Supplies
14166 Truesdell Laboratories.Inc. $2,644.00 Lab Services
14167 Trs Tropical Fish $1,269.30 Lab Parts&Supplies
14168 Union Dodge $18.389.69 1999 Dodge Ram Truck
14169 The Unisource Corporation $6,255.29 Office Supplies
14170 United Parcel Service $26.28 Parcel Services
14171 ULI $24.95 Publication
14172 Valley Cities Supply Company $3.548.05 Plumbing Supplies
14173 VWR Scientific Products $1.144.20 Lab Supplies
14174 The Wackenhut Corporation $12.235.51 Security Guards
14175 Wayne Electric Co. $315.58 Electrical Supplies
N 14176 Western Slates Chemical Inc. $23.734.36 Caustic Soda Solution C-038
tn 14IT7 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $715.00 Consulting Services
m 14178 Xerox Corporation $8.903.93 Copier Leases
14179 CNA Trust $24.383.90 Construction Contract d 541-1
14180 Vemw's Plumbing $19.035.00 Plumbing Supplies
14181 Donald F.McIntyre $571.98 Mewling Expense Reimb.
14182 Michael D.Moore $426.96 Training Expense Reimb.
14183 Peter M.Mordent, $657.18 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14184 Orange County Sanitation District $4,748.27 Workers Comp.Reimb.
14185 Douglas M.Stewart $755.00 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14186 Edward M.Tones $347.75 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14187 Burke Anderson $118.91 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14188 Layne T.Biracial $438.85 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14189 Molly Barons $2,400.00 Settlement Claim 97-CSD.98.L-2
14190 Jeffrey Brown $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting
14191 County of Orange $5,505.00 Supplemental Senator Service Fee&Cancellations
14192 Chloe D.Coo $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting
14193 Vladimir A.Kogan $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting
14194 Orange County Sanitation District $360.77 Petty Cash Reimb.
14195 Orrick,Herrington&Sutcliffe $7.500.00 Profamonal Services
14196 Public Financial Management $7,500.00 Certificate of Participation-1990-92 Series'C'Arbitrage Management Program
14197 U.S.Postal Service $5,000.00 Postage
14198 Pacft Bell $20.36 Telephone Services
3,2
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 913W8
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
14227 The Vantage Group,Inc. $53,618.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project
14228 the Gro Division $26,148.40 Residuals Removal MO4-26-95
14229 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $167,159.00 Engineering Services J40.1,J40-2
14230 Carollo Engineers $67,041.16 Engineering Services P1.60&P2-50
14231 Dail Marketing L.P. $90,320.51 Computers-2-Network Servers+6-Computers-Div 930
14232 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $76,884.80 Natural Gas
14233 Holmes&Narver Inc. $26.871.43 Engineering Services 241
14234 James Martin&Co. $83.757.50 Data Integration ProJecl
14235 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. $102.188.95 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
14236 Orange County Water District $46.353.60 Green Acres Proect Water Use MO 6.9-93
14237 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. $93,258.68 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
14238 Polydyne,Inc. $170,893.00 Callonic Polymer MO 3-11-92
14239 Power Distributors,Inc. $36.450.00 Lghling Fixtures Installation
14240 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. $59,425.06 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
14241 Southern California Edison $67.653.27 Power
14242 Tula RanchiMagan Farms $75.116.77 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
14243 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart $75.730.88 Legal Services
14244 Margate Construction Inc. $158,935.50 Construction P7-36-2
14245 American Telephone&Telegraph $12.64 Long Distance Telephone Services
74246 American Telephone&Telegraph $25.16 Long Distance Telephone Services
14247 American Telephone&Telegraph $1.285.14 Long Distance Telephone Services
14248 Able Equipment Rental $647.09 Equipment Rental
M 14249 Action Bearing $670.26 Mechanical Supplies
f] 14250 Advance Aluminum&Brass $19,896.00 Mechanical Supplies
r 14251 Allied Packing&Rubber Inc. $339.79 Mechanical Supplies
14252 Allied Supply Co. $134.64 Plumbing Supplies
14253 Allied Supply $837.73 Mechanical Supplies
14254 American Airlines $5.270.46 Travel Services
14255 American Payroll Association $125.00 Membership
14256 American Sigma,Inc. $18.80 Mechanical Supplies
14257 American Sigma,Inc. $18,716.20 Mechanical Supplies
14258 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $575.00 Service Agreement
14259 Appleane Employment Service $7,643.34 Temporary Employment Services
14260 Applied Industrial Technology $94.26 Pump Supplies
14261 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $325.00 Lab Supplies
14262 Awards&Trophies By Bea $322.71 Plaques
14263 AKM Consulting Engineers $12,173.36 Consulting Services 11-20
14264 AMAI/Padgett-Thompson $395.00 Training Expense
14265 API Fund For Payroll Education $618.00 Training Expense
14266 AWSI $256.00 D.O.T.Training Program
14267 Bailey Fischer&Porter Company $187.67 Electrical Supplies
14288 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $1,559.21 Printing MO 11-7-94
14269 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $3,200.32 Telephone Installation
14270 Bauer Compressors $116.24 Compressor Supplies
14271 Beckman Instruments,Inc. 5445.15 Lab Supplies
14272 Black Box Corporation $506.24 Computer Supplies
14273 Boise Radiator Service $264.30 Truck Repairs
14274 Boyle Engineering Corporation $21,635.82 Engineering Services 7-23
14275 Bristol Systems,Inc. $9,600.00 Consulting Services-V21k Project
a a�
a
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 9/3W8
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
14275 BrBhinee Electric $165.08 Electrical Supplies
14277 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $8,110.00 Janitorial Services MO 1.12-94
14278 BNI Building News $21a.37 Subscription
14279 California Auto Refrigeration $352.33 Service Agreement
14280 California Relocation Services $156.00 Moving Services
14281 Celtrol,Inc. $2.988.15 Hardware
14282 Cashes,Inc. $2.679.58 Valve Supplies
14283 Century Paint $240.10 Paint Supplies
14284 Charles P.Crowley Co, $656.45 Instrument Pads
14285 Chrome Crankshaft Co. $240.00 Pump Supplies
14286 City Office Furniture,Inc. $371.68 Office Furniture
14287 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. $220.24 Office Supplies
14288 Compressor Components Of Calif. $1.745.55 Pump Supplies
14289 Computers America,Inc. $358.74 Computer Supplies
14290 Connell GM Pads $44.39 Truck Supplies
14291 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. $2.188.99 Electrical Supplies
14292 Cooper Cameron Corporation $2,349.97 Engine Supplies
14293 Copelco Capital,Inc. $2,864.00 Copier Lease
14294 Corporate Express Imaging $442.54 Instrument Supplies
14295 Corporate Express $5.022.43 Office Supplies
14296 Cost Containment Solutions $500.96 Workers Compensation Services
14297 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $91.97 Truck Pads
14296 Cylec Industries $16.241.35 Anionic Polymer
14299 CH2M HILL $3.055.62 Engineering Services J-31
N14300 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection $713.15 Lab Supplies
14301 CPI-The Alternative Supplier $4,728.13 Lab Supplies
14302 CS Company $240.00 Plumbing Supplies
14303 CWEA 1998 Conference $350.00 Conference Registration
14304 Davis Instruments $505.12 Mechanical Supplies
14305 DeZurick $777.70 Valves
14306 Dickmns Inc. $933.12 Electrical Supplies
14307 Dover Elevator Company $1,203.60 Elevator Maintenance
14308 Dupont Engineered Services $14.500.00 Painting Maintenance Services MO 4.22-98
14309 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. $122.00 Medical Screening
14310 Electra Band,Inc. $404.06 Mechanical Supplies
14311 Elsevier Science $821.00 Subscription
14312 Emergency Management Network,Inc. $2.000.00 CPPJFbst Aid Training
14313 Enchanter,Inc. $5,000.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95
14314 EMAT West'98 $335.00 Registration Fees
14315 EDE International,Inc. $6,932.50 Risk Assessment-Y21,Protect
14316 Federal Express Corp. $111.55 Air Freight
14317 Flbedron $981.95 Fiber Optic Cable
14318 FNaNET Corporation $2,742.01 Computer Software B IDM Desktop Training Expense
14319 Fisher Scientific $1,213.37 Lab Supplies
14320 Flo-Systems,Inc. $75.52 Pump Supplies
14321 Franklin Covey $490.91 OBIce Supplies
14322 Fry'sElectronics $183.12 Computer Supplies
14323 City of Fullerton $459.75 Water Use
14324 FLW Inc. $414.40 Electrical Supplies
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 9/30/98
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
14325 G.E.Supply Company $8,896.60 Electric Parts
14326 Ganahl Lumber Company $2,271.95 Lumber/Hardware
14327 Garra0-Callahan Company $1,410.99 Chemicals
14328 Gouge Repair Service $204.31 Gauge Repair
14329 General Binding Corporation $470.77 Maintenance Agreement
14330 GTE California $6,153.47 Telephone Services
14331 Giedich-Mitchell,Inc. $556.72 Pump Supplies
14332 Government Institutes Inc. $95.00 Publication
14333 VWy Grainger Inc. $1.254.75 Compressor Supplies
14334 Great American Printing Co. $4.176.87 Printing
14335 Guy L.Warden 8 Sons $81.91 Compressor Supplies
14336 GST,Inc./Micro City $2.305.14 Office Supplies
14337 Hach Company $382.81 Lob Supplies
14338 Harrington Industrial Plastics $617.74 Plumbing Supplies
14339 Hello Direct.Inc. $868.16 Telephone Headsets
14340 Here's Blockforesl Bakery $101.40 Director's Meeting Expense
14341 Hewlett-Packard $2,456.70 Service Agreement
14342 HIIIi Inc. $2,641.47 Tools
14343 Hoerblger Service Inc. $1.333.09 Compressor Parts
143" The Holman Group $745.50 Employee Assistance Program Premium
14345 Hub Auto Supply $20.27 Truck Parts
14346 City of Huntington Beach $16.013.07 Water Use
M 14347 HI Standard Automotive $407.41 Truck Parts
n 14348 Ideal Scanners 8 Systems $926.00 Software
w 14349 Industrial Threaded Products.Inc. $127.26 Connectors
14350 InfoEdge Inc. $585.00 Computer Supplies
14351 Inland Empire Equipment.Inc. $211.24 Truck Supplies
14352 International Mascot Corporation $2,000.00 Equipment Rental
14353 Irvine Ranch Water District $55.14 Water Use
14354 City of Irvine $178.68 Inspection Services
14365 law,Inc. $88.11 Instruments
14356 IBM Corporation $5,177.38 Service Contract
14357 IDM Controls Inc. $8.142.14 Equipment Repair
14358 IPCO Safety-Ca $447.65 Safety Supplies
14359 ISA Expo/98 $90.00 Registration Fees
14360 J.G.Tucker and Sm.Inc. $591.66 Instrument Supplies
14361 J.L.Winged Co. $101.15 Electrical Supplies
14362 Jay's Catering $766.69 Directors Meeting Expense
14363 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. $5,125.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
14364 Kahl Scientific Instruments $191.56 Lab Supplies
14365 Kelar Training Centers $2.985.00 Registration Fees
14366 Knox Industrial Supplies $927.48 Tools
14367 LaserAll Corp. $557.82 Service Agreement
14368 Liquid Handling Systems $4.31 Mechanical Supplies
14369 LA Cellular Telephone Company $1,957.52 Cellular Telephone Service
14370 M.E.Sllbermenn Co. $22,373.53 Sewer Repair
14371 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers $1,615.00 Engineering Services 2-37
14372 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $911.15 Tools
14373 Motor.Inc. $7,500.00 Consulling Services-Source Control Dale Integration Project
ar
}
Qarlga County Sanitation District
Clothes Paid 9/30/98
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
14374 Micro Flex 57,204.00 Gloves
14375 MlcroAge Computer $3,701.55 Computer Supples-1-HP Printer 8 1-Print Server
14376 Mission Uniform Service $3,372.42 Uniform Rentals
14377 Morton Sall $283.99 Salt
14378 MotoPhoto $55.01 Photographic Services
14379 MGD Technologies,Inc. $9,850.00 Maintenance Agreement
14380 MPS Photographic Services $17.79 Office Supplies
14351 National Fire Protection $525.00 Membership Renewal Fees
14382 National Seminars Group $199.00 Seminar Registration
14383 Network Construction Services $9,640.00 Construction Services-Wiring
14384 Network Solutions Group $780.00 Lab Services
14385 City of Newport Beach $10,288.25 Constroclien Services-PCH/Newport Blvd.Interchange Improvements
14386 Nexlel Communications $816.81 Cellular Phones 8 Air time
14387 Nickey Petroleum Co.Inc. $19,739.83 LubrlcentrDiesel Fuel
14388 NAB Associates,Inc $034.50 Service Agreement-1998 Regional Monitoring Program
14389 NOV Ecotrans Group,LLC $114.09 Publications
14390 Office Depot Business Services $4,484.47 Office Supplies
14391 Olsten Stalling Service,Inc. $2.826.00 Temporary Employment Services
14392 Oracle Corporation $3,636.00 Software-Training
14393 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. $53.93 Instrument Supplies
14394 Orange Courier $10.60 Courier Services
14395 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company $85.75 Fittings
n 14396 Oxygen Service Company 52,150.18 Specialty Gases
t7 14397 DAG $961.19 Software License
l� 14398 Pacific Bell $1,278.41 Telephone Services
14399 Pacific Mechanical Supply $1,143.27 Plumbing Supplies
14400 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. 34,599.64 Instrument Supplies
14401 Pads Unlimited $110.56 Truck Supplies
14402 Pitney Bowes $336.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement
14403 Presidium lnc. $2.083.33 Workees Comp.Claims Admin.
14404 Primavera $15,181.20 Consulting Servces
14405 Pyramid Fence Company,Inc. $6,301.00 Fencing Installation
14406 PCS Express $123.00 Courler Services
14407 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2.157.61 Trash Removal
14408 Ralnin Instmment Co.,Inc. $412.02 Lab Supplies
14409 Reliaslar $8,128.00 Life Insurance Premium
14410 Reliaslar Bankers Security Life Ins. $5.183.40 Life Insurance Premium
14411 Remedy $9.954.84 Temporary Employment Services
14412 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop $112.71 Auto Repair
14413 Rosen's Electrical E9uipmenl Co. $538.75 Elecirical Supplies
14414 RJN Group,Inc. $6.082.50 CMMS Consulting Services
14415 RPM Electric Motors $161.83 Electric Motor Supplies
14416 HIS Hughes Co.,Inc. SS01.81 Paint Supplies
14417 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. $598.05 Specialty Gases
14418 Scott.Reilly B Whitehead $342.33 Legal Services-Personnel Issues
14419 Sea Water Visions $165.51 Chiller
14420 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. $335.00 Lab Repairs
14421 Seagate Software $1.275.00 Training Fee
14422 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering $1,833.36 ToolsrHardware
Orange County Sensation District
Claims Paid 9130I96
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
14423 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. $502.78 Lab Supplies
14424 Skyline Displays of Orange County,Inc. $2,112.51 Halogen Light Set
14425 Smith Pipe 8 Supply Inc. $275.86 Plumbing Supplies
14426 Snap-On Incorporated $242.39 Tools
14427 So.Cal.Gas Company $13,045.30 Natural Gas
14428 South Coast Water $170.00 Water System Maint.Agreement
14429 Spex Cedprep Inc. $359.67 Lab Supplies
14430 Sprint $34.95 Long Distance Telephone Service
14431 Square D Company $5.969.44 Software License Agreement
14432 Slate Chemical Mfg.Co. $156.51 Janitorial Supplies
14433 Steve Caserta Construction Co. $9,076.86 Construction Services-Street Repair
14434 Strata International,Inc. $926.98 Chemicals
14435 Summit Steel 5444.02 Metal
14436 Sun-Belt Landscape B Maintenance $5,425.00 Landscape Maint.
14437 Sunset Ford $213.57 Truck Supplies
14438 Swains Electric Motor Service $223.91 Pump
14439 Peer A.Swan $25.00 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14440 Taylor Industrial Software $5,035.00 Service Agreement
14441 Thomas Gray S Assoc. $330.00 Lab Services
�J 14442 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $294.83 Mechanical Supplies
14443 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. $131.53 Truck Supplies
14444 Underground Service Alert of So.Callf. $275.00 Membership
w 14445 Union Bank of California $104.69 Account Analysis
rr 14446 Union Dodge $20,239.76 1998 Dodge Truck
jt 14447 United Parcel Service $588.03 Parcel Services
rn 14448 University Products,Inc. $74.10 Office Supplies
14449 Valley Cities Supply Company $3,56949 Plumbing Supplies
14450 VernWs Plumbing $3,490.00 Plumbing Supplies
14451 VWR Scientific Products $9,459.89 Lab Supplies
14452 The Wackenhut Corporation $9,160.48 Security Guards
14453 Weather and Wind Instrument Co. $475.72 Wind Sock Frame
14454 West Coast Safety Supply Co, $391.75 Tools
14455 Weslmx International $16.57 Mechanical Supplies
14456 Xerox Corporation $5,923.91 Copier Leases
14457 3CMA $540.00 Registration Fees
14458 Systems Integrated $12,471.84 Construction Services J-31-3
14459 Nicholas J.Arhonles $100.00 Training Expense Reimb.
14460 Layne T.Baroldi $399.39 Training Expense Reimb.
14461 Shabbir S.Basmi $951.79 Training Expense Reimb.
14462 Eva M.Bradford $57.85 Director Meeting Expense Reimb.
14463 Patrick B.Carnahan $205.28 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14464 David M.Chafe $599.54 Training Expense Reimb.
1"65 John B. Falkenstein $1,302.31 Inspection Travel Expense Reimb.
14466 Michelle R.Hetherington $353.90 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14467 David A.Ludwin $605.00 Registration Fee Reknb.
14468 James McCann $19001 Training Expense Reimb.
14469 Peter M.Morrison $250.00 Training Expense Reimb.
14470 Robert Ooten $252.53 Meeting Expense Reimb.
q
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 9130198
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
14471 Charles E.Reed $411.27 Training Expense Reimb.
14472 Dale E.Sparks $322.80 Training Expense Reimb.
14473 Antonio S.Valenzuela $468.05 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14474 Paula A.Zeller $368.74 Training Expense Reimb.
14475 County of Orange $2,790.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
14476 Dell Computer Corporation&Brad Cagle $2,980A2 Employee Computer Loan Program
14477 James E.Hauler $2.314.79 Employee Computer Loan Program
14478 Stephen V.Kozak $330.00 Training Expense Reimb.
14479 Orange Computer Systems&Victor Salinas $1,542.92 Employee Computer Loan Program
1"80 Orange County Sanitation District $4W.34 Petty Cash Reimb.
14481 Cooper Cameron Corporation $650.00 Engine Supplies
2,074, 550.67
r�
P
W
fr
n
Ch
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mmbng Date I road.ort»r.
11/18/98
AGENDA REPORT Item Number I QMPMber
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.
SUMMARY
See attached listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
\vaMVnat\yygNnVNabiOpe\WPFILES`[Iaingatl M[
Page t
ATTACHMENTS
e
1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 10/1/98 -10/15/98 & 10/16/98— 10/31/98.
BA
a.w.a bwm Page
<tq -
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 1011/98 - 10115/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
14482 Barry C. Groveman, Esq. $ 15,000.00 Expert Witness Fees
14483 Isiah J.Mitchell 50,000.00 EEOC Settlement 8 Release Claim#J-CSD-98-L-11
14484 Carollo Engineers 59,880.63 Engineering Services-Pt-38,P243, MO 4.14-93
14485 Orange County Sanitation District 386,354.54 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
14486 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 89,062.51 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044
14487 Western Stales Chemical Inc. 46.409.02 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
14488 Court Order 212.50 Wage Garnishment
14489 Court Order 455.15 Wage Garnishment
14490 Brown and Caldwell 3,713.88 Construction Contract MO 7-24-96
14491 Bush 8 Associates Inc. 18,654.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97
14492 Court Order 581.00 Wage Garnishment
14493 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
14494 CASA 175.00 Conference Registration
14495 Court Order 611.07 Wage Garnishment
14496 DGA Consultants, Inc. 3,694.62 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
14497 Franchise Tax Board 522.24 Wage Garnishment
14498 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
14499 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 COP Arbitrage Rebate
14500 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,788.75 Dues Deduction
14501 IPCO Safety-Ca 766.85 Safety Supplies
14502 Labware Inc. 1.500.00 Lab Information Management System Software MO 2-26-97
14503 Lee 8 Ro Inc. 21,998.90 Engineering Consulting Services-MO 12-8-93
14504 Lessons in Leadership 1,275.00 Seminar Registration
14505 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 664.70 Tools
14506 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange 7,010.00 ULFT Program
14507 Office Depot Business Services 3,436.35 Office Supplies
14508 Orange County Family Support 1.188.78 Wage Garnishment
14509 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
14510 OCEA 582.62 Dues Deduction
14511 Pacific Mechanical Supply 555.05 Plumbing Supplies
14512 Court Order 100.00 Wage Garnishment
14513 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment
14514 Peace Officers Council of CA 837.00 Dues Deduction
14616 Precision Backhoe 6,622.80 Equipment Rental
14516 RJN Group, Inc. 9,000.00 CMMS Consulting Services
14517 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 334.80 Specialty Gases
11191M8 1:50 PM BA Page 1 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-96.xls
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 1011198 - 10115198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14518 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 139.59 Tools
14519 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 576.64 Tools/Hardware
14520 Snap-On Incorporated 235.96 Tools
14521 State of California 95.42 Hazardous Waste Tax
14522 Summit Steel 1,098.29 Metal
14523 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 202.32 Mechanical Supplies
14624 Mary S.Thompson 116.85 Training Expense Ralmb.
14525 Lisa L. Tomko 300.00 Training Expense Reimb.
14526 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions
14527 Valcom 2,988.45 Software
14528 Tadao G.Vitko 151.80 Training Expense Reimb.
14529 Nicholas J.Arhontes 102.46 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14530 Bradley H. Cagle 223.76 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14531 Barbara A. Collins 144.98 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14532 Ronald L. Dewitt,Jr. 275.29 Training Expense Reimb.
14533 Rick B. Russell 708.39 Training Expense Reimb.
14534 Operation Technology, Inc. 890.00 Computer Software
14535 Allied Supply Company 40,401.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
14536 IPI'GrammTech, Inc. 76,875.00 Computer Software-PowerMart Suite needed for Data Warehouselintegration
14537 Jamison Engineering, Inc. 25,816.20 Sewer Emergency Repair 300 8 of 24"D.I.P. in Zone 5
14538 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25,358.56 Medical Insurance Premium
14539 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 50,554.80 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
14540 Network Catalyst 43,730.35 (14)3 COM Computer Networking Hubs
14541 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 29,604.39 Instrument Supplies
14542 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 139,770.48 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
14543 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 37,176.67 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
14544 United HealthCare/Metra Health 132,963.79 Medical Health Insurance
14545 Advanco Constructors, Inc. 172,973.90 Construction J-34-1, P2-35-5
14646 First Fire Systems, Inc. 115,85C92 Construction Contract J-57 MO 2-25-98
14547 Fleming Engineering, Inc. 28,461.72 Construction 7-17
14548 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. 258,275.25 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97
14549 NCCI Enterprises, Inc. 96,962.85 Construction Contract is 2-40
14550 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 195,866.10 Construction 7-7-1
14551 American Telephone&Telegraph 3.404.02 Long Distance Telephone Services
14552 American Telephone&Telegraph 2.19 Long Distance Telephone Services
14553 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 22,921.02 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 8-8-89
14554 Airborne Express 63.45 Air Freight
14555 Allied Electronics, Inc. 156.32 Electrical Supplies
11/9198 1:50 PM BA Page 2 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98-.%!�sv
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 1011198 - 10/16/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14556 American Seals West 21.55 Gaskets
14557 American Sigma, Inc. 17,516.36 Mechanical Supplies
14558 Anixter Inc. 4,373.25 Computer Supplies
14559 Appleone Employment Service 4,616.37 Temporary Employment Services
14560 Applied Industrial Technology 984.98 Pump Supplies
14561 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 4,500.00 Lab Supplies
14562 Arizona Instrument 1,267.90 Instrument Supplies
14563 Armor-Vac 1,738.00 Vacuum Truck Services
14564 Arrow Cranehoist Corp. 43.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
14565 Asco Services 2,497.64 Emergency Repair of Transfer Switch-Bay Bridge Pump Station
14566 Aurora Data Systems 11,495.00 MSDS Pro Enterprise Version& Service Agreement-Intranet Project
14567 Awards&Trophies By Bea 105.73 Plaques
14568 ABL,Inc. 199.00 Subscription
14569 Assoc of Melro.Sewerage Agencies 905.00 Training Registration
14570 APEX Communications 6,534.87 Communication Equipment Upgrade
14571 Banana Blueprint, Inc. 1.975.87 Printing MO 11-7-94
14572 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 2,992.16 Telephone Installation
14573 Battery Specialties 173.78 Batteries
14574 Ben Franklin Crafts 39.67 Award
14575 BioSphencal Instruments Inc. 9.32 Electrical Supplies
14576 Black Box Corporation 6.729.15 Computer Supplies
14577 Bristol Systems, Inc. 12,000.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project
14578 Builders Book, Inc. 45.54 Subscription
14579 BNI Building News 531.00 Subscription
14580 BOC Edwards 765.85 Lab Supplies
14561 California Municipal Statistics, Inc. 425.00 Computation of OCSO Direct&Overlapping Debt
14582 Callrol, Inc. 434.52 Hardware
14583 Camali Corp. 4,562.50 Service Agreement
14584 Cad Warren&Co. 1,094.31 Insurance Claims Administrator
14585 Centrepointe Commercial Interior 7,499.41 Office Furniture
14586 Cerfnet 20.00 Computer Services
14587 Charles P. Crowley Co. 655.71 Instrument Parts
14588 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas 8,370,75 Trustee Bank Service-Series 1993 Refunding CIP
14589 City of Costa Mesa 2,508.00 Service Contract-Fairview Road Rehabilitation
14590 City of Fullerton 2.500.00 Water Use
14591 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 2,104.84 Professional Services
14592 Cale-Parmer Instrument Company 168.25 Lab Supplies
14593 Computers America, Inc. 1,576.15 Computer Supplies
1119198 1:50 PM BA Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xis
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 10/1198 - 10/15198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14594 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 6,123.59 Electrical Supplies
14595 Consolidated Freightways 430.51 Freight
14596 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 762.87 Plumbing Supplies
14597 Converse Consultants 102.00 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93
14598 Cooper Cameron Corporation 1.542.24 Engine Supplies
14599 Corporate Express Imaging 158.65 Instrument Supplies
14600 Corporate Express 654.88 Once Supplies
14601 CorDax/Bentley Systems, Inc. 4,D40.63 Computer Software for Plant Automation/Reinvention Project If J42
14602 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 46.31 Truck Parts
14603 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 146.53 Mechanical Supplies
14604 County of Orange 2,898.91 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
14605 County Wholesale Electric Co. 259.68 Electrical Supplies
14606 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection 1,313.10 Lab Supplies
14607 CPI-The Alternative Supplier 922.37 Lab Supplies
14608 Datavault 320.50 OBske Back-Up Tape Storage
14609 Dell Marketing L.P. 15,192.78 6 Computer Workstations
14610 DeZurick 1,512.81 Valves
14811 Dover Elevator Company 1,203.60 - Elevator Maintenance
14612 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 386.82 Paint Supplies
14613 Electra Bond, Inc. 560.30 Mechanical Supplies
14814 Elsevier Science 589.00 Subscription
14615 Enchanter, Inc. 2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
14616 EIS Electrical Insulation Supply 157.68 Electrical Supplies
14617 Federal Express Corp. 56.35 Air Freight
14618 Filter Supply Company 674.28 Filters
14619 Fisher Scientific 720.96 Lab Supplies
14620 Flo-Systems, Inc. 1,838.97 Pump Supplies
14621 Forked Engineering 8 Surveying 10,455.00 Engineering Services P-150
14622 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 17,689.31 Lang Term Disability Premium
14623 Fountain Valley Camera 47.20 Photo Supplies
14624 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 732.19 Paint Supplies
14625 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash 396.00 Truck Wash Tickets
14626 Franklin Covey Co. 229.00 Training Registration
14627 Fry's Electronics 2.944.24 Computer Supplies
14628 GTE California 3,589.09 Telephone Services
14629 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 10.00 Pump Supplies
14630 WW Grainger Inc. 1,416.49 Compressor Supplies
14631 Graphic Distributors 818.00 Photographic Supplies
1119/98 1:50 PM BA Page 4 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98cs
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 10/1198 - 10115/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14632 Graseby STI 2,494.10 Engine Supplies
14633 Graybar Electric Company 15,269.58 Electrical Supplies
14634 Great American Printing Co. 1,428.20 Printing Service
14635 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 511.15 Janitorial Supplies
14636 Haaker Equipment Company 2,618.04 Truck Supplies
14637 Hach Company 69.08 Lab Supplies
14638 Harbour Engineering Group 2.911.10 Mechanical Parts
14639 Harold Primrose Ice 96.00 Ice For Samples
14640 Harrington Industrial Plastics 480.73 Plumbing Supplies
14641 Hatch&Kirk Inc. 5,947.15 Truck Supplies
14642 Herb's Blackforest Bakery& Deli 462.20 Training Expense for Catering-Div 720&730
14643 Hoerbiger Service Inc. 1,347.50 Compressor Parts
14644 The Holman Group 738.40 Employee Assistance Program Premium
14645 Home Depot 352.52 Small Hardware
14646 Hub Auto Supply 275.46 Truck Parts
14647 Huntington Beach Library 185.50 Meeting Room Renal Fee
14648 HI Standard Automotive 1,677.11 Truck Parts
14649 Idexx 1.622.87 Lab Supplies
14650 Imaging Plus, Inc. 460.76 Office Supplies
14651 Impulse 67.17 Mechanical Supplies
14652 Industrial Steam 220.08 Pump Supplies
14653 Industrial Threaded Products 5,693.41 Connectors
14654 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 261.87 Lab Supplies
14655 IBM Corporation 538.79 After-hours Phone Support-Various AS/400 Problems
14656 IPCO Safety-Ca. 211.55 Safety Supplies
14657 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 520.47 Instrument Supplies
14658 J.L.Wingert Co. 390.69 Electrical Supplies
14659 J.P.Morgan Securities, Inc. 22,451.51 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series
14660 J.P. Nissen Co. 47.77 Office Supplies
14661 Jay's Catering 213.95 Directors Meeting Expense
14662 John Mangiapane 400.00 Repair Service-Trawl Nets
14663 Johnstone Supply 1,402.64 Electrical Supplies
14664 Kelly Paper 403.32 Paper
14665 Knox Industrial Supplies 5,860.15 Tools
14666 Komax Systems, Inc. 623.12 Plumbing Supplies
14667 Lantronix 116.37 Computer Supplies
14668 League Of California Cities 500.00 Conference Registration
14669 Lexis-Nexis 373.41 Subscription
1119/98 1:50 PM BA Page 5 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xis
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 10/1198 -10/16/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14670 LA Cellular Telephone Company 32.31 Cellular Telephone Service
14671 M.E. Silbermann Co. 24,197.70 Sewer Repair
14672 Mamco International 139.00 Janitorial Supplies
14673 Mar Vac Electronics 76.50 Instrument Supplies
14674 Margate Construction 7,000.00 Construction Pl-36-2
14675 Mc Junket Corp 3,880.65 Plumbing Supplies
14676 McKenna Engineering&Equipment 1,794.08 Pump Supplies
14677 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,685.74 Tools
14678 McWelco Rack-N-Box Co. 574.85 Auto Parts&Supplies
14679 Micro Flex 3D4.00 Gloves
14680 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 13,537.73 Mechanical Repairs
14681 Mission Uniform Service 1,735.27 Uniform Rentals
14682 Motion Industries 73.38 Pump Supplies
14683 MotoPhoto 18.19 Photographic Services
14684 MGDTechnclogies, Inc. 4,660.00 Maintenance Agreement
14685 MPS Photographic Services 36.10 Water System Maint.Agreement
14686 MSA C/O Mag Systems 273.40 Electrical Supplies
14687 Mine Safety Appliances Company 4,981.02 Safety Supplies
14688 National Civic League 325.00 Meeting Registration
14689 National Plant Services, Inc. 5,900.00 Vacuum Truck Services - -
14690 Neal Supply Co. 452.55 Plumbing Supplies
14691 Newark Electronics 147.96 Instrument Supplies
14692 Nextel Communications 476.47 Cellular Phones&Air Time
14693 Nidrey Petroleum Co. Inc. 1,766.46 LubricantlDiesel Fuel
14694 NAS Associates,Inc. 483.00 Service Agreement-1998 Regional Monitoring Program
14695 Office Depot Business Services 905.71 Office Supplies
14696 Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 768.00 Temporary Employment Services
14697 Oracle Education 1,515.00 Training Registration
14698 Orange County EMA 808.50 Permit Fees
14699 Orange County Farts Supply 123.91 Chemicals
14700 Orange County Wholesale Electric 438.86 Instrument Supplies
14701 Orange Valve&Fitting Company 534.96 Fittings
14702 Oxygen Service Company 1,919.64 Specialty Gases
14703 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 970.10 Electrical Supplies
14704 Pacific Bell 35.76 Telephone Services
14705 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,703.86 Plumbing Supplies
14706 Padre Janitorial Supplies 538.16 Janitorial Supplies
14707 Pagenet 1,730.91 Rental Equipment
1119/98 1:50 PM BA Page 6 of 9 CWlmu Paid Ropoit 10 15-ua')*a
t I%
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 10/1198 -10115198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14708 Pads Unlimited 259.84 Truck Supplies
14709 Peerless Wiping Materials Co. 721.93 Janitorial Supplies
14710 Polydyne, Inc. 11,557.87 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
14711 Pod Supply 203.00 Rope
14712 Power Design 3,839.70 Electrical Repairs
14713 Power Systems Services, Inc. 3,600.00 Service Agreement-Blowers 4& 5 Testing
14714 Prosum Information Technologies 1,200.00 Consulting Service- Intranet FrontPage'98
14715 R B R Instrumentation, Inc. 164.37 Electrical Supplies
14716 Realtime Systems Corporation 2,500.00 Integration& Support Services
14717 Remedy 6,283.93 Temporary Employment Services
14718 Reynolds& Reynolds Company 2,927.38 Printing Service-Wastehauler Manifest Form
14719 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 125.00 Auto Repair
14720 Rosen's Electrical Equipment 646.50 Electrical Supplies
14721 Royce Productions 10,503.10 Video Production Service- 10 Minute Orientation Video
14722 RPM Electric Motors 2,397.44 Electric Motor Supplies
14723 Scantech, Inc 6,013.45 Sewer System Atlas
14724 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 1,486.37 Specialty Gases
14725 Sears 40.53 Mechanical Supplies
14726 Shurduck Sales&Engineering 322.80 ToolslHardware
14727 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 436.39 Lab Supplies
14728 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. 273.45 Plumbing Supplies
14729 Snap-On Incorporated 69.91 Tools
14730 So.Cal. Gas Company 2,123.07 Natural Gas
14731 South Coast Air Quality Management 2,537.80 Service Agreement-Review of ACEMS Application
14732 Southern California Edison 7.894.62 Power
14733 Southwest Scientific Inc. 4,732.38 Instrument Supplies
14734 Sparling Instruments, Inc. 126.43 Meter
14735 Spex Ceriprep Inc. 1,425.62 Lab Supplies
14738 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 137.00 Janitorial Supplies
14737 State Street Bank and Trust Co. 5,825.88 COP Trustee Services
14738 Summit Steel 2,758.99 Metal
14739 Sunset Ford 120.28 Truck Supplies
14740 Super Chem Corporation 1,209.55 Chemicals
14741 Syscom, Inc. 1.521.68 On-Site Training
14742 SKC-West, Inc. 909.89 Safety Supplies
14743 SMACNA 5.00 Publication
14744 SWRCB Accounting Office 400.00 Annual Fee
14745 Taylor-Dunn 86.04 Electric Cad Pans
1119198 1:50 PM BA Page 7 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.x1s
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 1011198 -10115198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14746 Thermo LabSystems 1,500.00 Training Registration
14747 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,950.67 Mechanical Supplies
14748 Time Warner Communications 80.94 Cable Services
14749 Travel Executives 1.140.00 Travel Services
14760 Tropical Plaza Numery, Inc. 9,003.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
14751 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 288.04 Truck Supplies
14752 TCH Associates, Inc. 512.10 Lab Supplies
14753 Ultra Scientific 66.32 Lab Supplies
14754 Valley Cities Supply Company 3,619.85 Plumbing Supplies
14755 Vertex 1,034.40 Office Furniture
14756 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,497.00 Vision Service Premium
14757 VWR Scientific Products 2,487.74 Lab Supplies
14758 The Wackenhut Corporation 6,083.04 Security Guards
14759 Weather Services International 7.67 Computer Supplies
14760 Wellwater, Inc. 670.00 Permit Fee Refund
14761 Western Health Services 14,920.00 Degreaser
14762 Xerox Corporation 14,613.51 Copier Leases
14763 Voided Check - -
14764 Verve's Plumbing 9,760.00 Plumbing Supplies
14765 Shabbir S.Basrai 221.29 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14766 James E.Colston 182.25 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14767 Robert P.Ghirelli 62.81 Training Expense Reimb.
14768 Harriet Kader 193.53 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14769 Dustin Le 193.53 Training Expense Reimb.
14770 David A. Ludwin 477.28 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14771 Donald F. McIntyre 60.98 Cellular Expense Reimb.
14772 Michael D. Moore 518.80 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14773 Robert Dolan 160.50 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14774 LEIIen Ray 250.00 Cash Advance
14775 Adrian Renescu 221.87 Training Expense Reimb.
14776 Antonio S.Valenzuela 107.00 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14777 EZ ComputerNoxon Corp. &Victor Salinas 1,928.92 Computer Loan
14778 Orange County Sanitation District 16,809.65 Workers Comp. Reimb.
14779 Orange County Sanitation District 1,002.53 Petty Cash Reimb.
14780 Orange County Sanitation District 137.85 Petty Cash Reimb.
14781 Rita Riccardo 174.71 Training Expense Reimb.
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $2,799,806.09
11/9/98 1:50 PM BA Page 8 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-964ds
c5� a
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid 1011198 -10116198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Payroll Disbursements
11094-11241 Employee Paychecks $ 189,017.73 Biweekly Payroll I V7198
11242 Employee Paycheck 10,973.50 Termination
11243-11265 Directors'Paychecks 5.122.81 Payroll 10/14/98
31000-31441 Direct Deposit Payments 616,891.40 Biweekly Payroll 10f7198
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 821.005.44
Wire Transfer Payments
Texas Commerce Bank $ 148,842.54 October Interest Payment on 1993 Certificate of Deposits
Texas Commerce Bank 230,837.24 October Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series A Certificate of Deposits
State Street Bank 8 Trust 204,677.20 October Interest Payment on 1990-92 Series C Certificate of Deposits
Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 584,356.08
Total Claims Paid 10/1198 -10/16/98 $4,205,168.51
11/9198 1:50 PM BA Page 9 of 9 Claims Paid Report 10-15-98.xls
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid From 10116/98 to 10131198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Accounts Payable-Warrants
14782 CSMFO $ 60.00 Seminar Registration
14783 Anchor Paving 27,200.00 Raise Manholes
14784 Carollo Engineers 79,438.83 Engineering Services-P1-38, P2.43, MO 4-14-93
14785 Orange County Sanitation District 398.859.35 Payroll EFT Reimbursement
14786 Science Applications Intl., Co. 152.284.05 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94
14787 Southern California Edison 45.538.58 Power
14788 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 33,489.11 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044
14789 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 8,905.33 Engine Testing J-19
14790 Alisa Lynn Gorman 212.50 Wage Garnishment
14791 Almega Environmental&Technical 320.00 Service Agreement- Emissions Source Testing of Combustion Engines
14792 Barclays Law Publishers 99.00 Subscription
14793 Bentley Systems, Inc. 553.38 Software Maintenance Agreement
14794 Beverly May Gilliam 455.15 Wage Garnishment
14795 Boyle Engineering Corporation 7,430.40 Engineering Services 7-23
14796 British American Chamber of Commerce 35.00 Conference Registration
14797 Lori Colamonico 581.00 Wage Garnishment
14798 CorDax/Bentley Systems, Inc. 1,100.00 Registration Fee-Essential MicroStation Course
14799 Court Trustee 572.50 Wage Garnishment
14800 California Water Awareness Campaign 300.00 Campaign Contribution
14801 CNA Trust 19.217.10 Construction 5-41-1
14802 CWEA 1998 Conference 455.00 Conference Registration
14803 Diane Kilpatrick 611.07 Wage Garnishment
14804 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 99.51 Paint Supplies
14805 DGA Consultants, Inc. 8,192.20 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94
14806 Enterprise Technologies 16.754.70 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation
14807 Franchise Tax Board 97.81 Wage Garnishment
14808 Friend of the Court 339.50 Wage Garnishment
14809 Haaker Equipment Company 57.34 Truck Supplies
14810 Holmes&Narver Inc. 1.578.20 Engineering Services 2-41
14811 Internal Revenue Service 125.00 COP Arbitrage Rebate
14812 Intl Union of Oper Eng AFL-CIO 1,774A4 Dues Deduction
14813 J&W Scientific 300.00 Lab Supplies
14814 Moreland&Associates 11,243.50 Auditing Services MO 3-8-96
14815 National Seminars Group 395.00 Seminar Registration
14816 New Horizons Computer Learning 349.00 Software Training Classes
14817 The Norco Companies 111.80 Mail Delivery Service
14818 Optio Software 1,250,00 Software
11/9198 2:09 PM Page 1 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.r1:i •�
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid From 10116198 to 10/31198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14819 Orange County Family Support 1,188.78 Wage Garnishment
14820 Orange County Forum 30.00 Conference Registration
14821 Orange County Marshal 110.00 Wage Garnishment
14822 OCEA 573.37 Dues Deduction
14823 Pacific Bell 49.24 Telephone Services
14824 Pamala Garcla 100.00 Wage Gamishment
14825 Patricia Burkholder 296.00 Wage Garnishment
14826 Peace Officers Council of CA 837.00 Dues Deduction
14827 ShowCase Corporation 3.232.50 Software License
14828 So.Cal. Gas Company 17,215.47 Natural Gas
14829 State of Califomia 95.42 Hazardous Waste Tax
14830 SWRCB Accounting Office 10.000.00 Annual Fee
14831 United Way 94.00 Employee Contributions
14832 Cad E. Beach 374.03 Training Expense Reimb.
14833 Jeffrey Brown 96.66 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14834 Barbara A. Collins 103.80 Training Expense Reimb.
14835 Rick J. Hannappel 639.00 Training Expense Reimb.
14836 W.Doug Hauser 195.97 Training Expense Reimb.
14837 Warren S.Hawkins 357.46 Training Expense Reimb.
14838 Voided Check -
14839 John Kavoklis 360.85 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14840 Vladimir A. Kogan 408.21 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14841 Beatrice A. Mitchell 193.53 Training Expense Reimb.
14842 Edward M.Torres 432.08 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14843 Marco Polo S.Velasco 422.07 Training Expense Reimb.
14844 Charles F.Winsor 1,212.15 Meeting Expense Reimb.
14845 Computer library 2,164.89 Subscription
14846 Advance Constructors Inc. 209,500.00 Construction J-34-1, P2-35-5
14847 Airpol Construction, Inc. 270.345.08 Construction P1-51R
14948 Bio Gro Division 30,773.89 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
14849 Business Objects Americas 49.034.44 Software-Data Warehouse/Integration Project
14850 Cincinnati Incorporated 94,176.77 Hydraulic Press Brake
14851 Dell Marketing L.P. 48.236.20 10 Dell Latitude Cpi 266XT 8 1 Inspiron D233XT Notebook Computers
14852 Delta Dental 38,892.82 Dental Insurance Plan
14853 James Martin&Co. 111,125.43 Data Integration Project
14854 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 25.385.80 Medical Insurance Premium
14855 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 38,447.45 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
14856 Margate Construction, Inc. 48,259.00 Construction Pl-36-2
11/9198 2:09 PM Page 2 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.xis
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid From 10116198 to 10131198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14857 Olsson Construction 33,003.00 Construction P2-39-1
14858 Pacificare of Ca 40.495.97 Health Insurance Premium
14859 Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 70,461.05 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
14860 Polydyne, Inc. 28,408.23 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
14861 Sverdrup Civil, Inc. 26,034.18 Construction 7-7-1
14862 Tule Ranch/Magan Fans 69,494.26 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95
14863 Western States Chemical, Inc. 32,610.06 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
14864 Woodruff, Spradlin& Smart 98.282.72 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
14865 The Vantage Group, Inc. 9,832.00 Professional Services-Source Control Programming
14866 American Telephone&Telegraph 13.23 Long Distance Telephone Services
14867 A-Plus Systems 696.96 Notices&Ads
14868 Abrasive Engineering Tool& Equipment 36.47 Hardware
14869 Accountants Overload 1,224.00 Temporary Employment Services
14870 Advanced Engine Tech Corp. 3,647.50 Engine Testing J-19
14871 Aidco Systems, Inc. 3,188.76 Engine Supplies
14872 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 13.20 Lab Supplies
14873 Airborne Express 16.50 Air Freight
14874 Allied Supply Company 11,432.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies
14875 American Management Association 139.00 Seminar Registrations/Subscription
14876 American National Standards, Inc. 24.00 Publication
14877 American Sigma, Inc. 863.48 Mechanical Supplies
14878 Anicom, Inc. 407.30 Electrical Parts&Supplies
14879 Anixter, Inc. 41.00 Computer Supplies
14680 Appleone Employment Service 5.513.91 Temporary Employment Services
14881 Applied Industrial Technology 9.893.61 Pump Supplies
14882 Aquatic Testing Laboratories 950.00 Lab Supplies
14883 Asbury Environmental Services 55.00 Waste Oil Removal
14884 Azur Environmental 275.60 Lab Supplies
14885 AKM Consulting Engineers 20.120.00 Engineering Services 11-17.1 MO 6-24-98
14886 Bailey Fischer&Porter Company 382.27 Electrical Supplies
14887 Baker Process 999.92 Mechanical Supplies
14888 Banana Blueprint, Inc. 583.17 Printing MO 11-7-94
14889 Bar Tech Telecom, Inc. 225.00 Telephone Installation
14890 Battery Specialties 52.11 Batteries
14891 BuyComp 3,555-14 Computer Supplies
14892 Cal-Glass, Inc. 135.23 Lab Supplies
14893 Califomia Environmental Controls 864.77 Electrical Parts&Supplies
14894 California Auto Refrigeration 60.30 Service Agreement
1119/98 2:20 PM Page 3 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.t68
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid From 10/16198 to 10131/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14895 Callrol, Inc. 2.016.88 Hardware
14896 Canus Corporation 206.28 Fiber Optic Cable
14897 Carleton Engineers&Consultants 13.75 Engineering Services-Air Quality
14898 Cashes, Inc. 90.39 Valve Supplies
14899 Charles P. Crowley Co. 326.36 Instrument Parts
14900 Clayton Group Services, Inc. 721.48 Professional Services
14901 Coast Rubber Stamp, Mfg. 40.19 Office Supplies
14902 Color Arts, Inc. 1,714.31 Vehicle Decals
14903 Communications Performance Group 18.180.00 Professional Services
14904 Compuserve Incorporated 284.15 Computer Services
14905 Computers America, Inc. 3.840.82 Computer Supplies
14906 Connell GM Parts 41.95 Truck Supplies
14907 Consolidated Electrical Distributors 7,331.07 Electrical Supplies
14908 Consolidated Plastics Company 842.45 Welding Equipment&Supplies
14909 Converse Consultants 382.50 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93
14910 Cooper Cameron Corporation 15,455.37 Engine Supplies
14911 Copelco Capital,Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease
14912 Corporate Express 2,508.62 Office Supplies
14913 Cost Containment Solutions 2,128.51 Workers Comp. Services
14914 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 66.45 Truck Pads
14915 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 133.06 Mechanical Supplies
14916 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 4,356.00 Underground Tank Fees
14917 County of Orange 3,915.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
14918 County Wholesale Electric Co. 12.69 Electrical Supplies
14919 Culligan Water Conditioning 30.00 Soft Water Service
14920 CPI: Califomia Pipeline Inspection 1,173.00 Lab Supplies
14921 CR& R Incorporated 315.00 Container Rentals
14922 CWEA 1998 Conference 315.00 Conference Registration
14923 Daily Pilot 150.00 Notices&Ads
14924 Day-Timers, Inc. 27.74 Office Supplies
14925 Decorative Arts 650.00 Refinish Desk
14926 Del Mar Analytical 2,382.00 Biosolids Analysis
14927 DeZudck 14,287.87 Valves
14928 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 466.73 Paint Supplies
14929 Duthie Generator Service, Inc. 6,306.00 Generator Supplies
14930 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 200.00 Medical Screening
14931 Electra Bond, Inc. 1,777.88 Mechanical Supplies
14932 Emergency Management Network 3,000.00 CPR/First Aid Training
1119198 2:09 PM Page 4 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.x1s
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid From 10/16/98 to 10/31/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14933 Enchanter, Inc. 6.300.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95
14934 Enterprise Technologies 5,432.50 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation
14935 Environmental Resources Association 1.238.80 Lab Services
14936 ESP Industries, Inc. 216.36 Mechanical Supplies
14937 Federal Express Corp. 127.15 Air Freight
14938 Filter Supply Company 530.17 Filters
14939 Fisher Scientific 388.64 Lab Supplies
14940 Fluke Electronics Corp. 11,152.24 Electrical Supplies
14941 Fountain Valley Camera 28.04 Photo Supplies
14942 Voided Check -
14943 Voided Check - -
14944 Fry's Electronics 950.64 Computer Supplies
14945 FST Sand and Gravel, Inc. 552.13 Road Base Materials
14946 G.E. Supply Company 461.58 Electric Parts
14947 Ganahl Lumber Company 178.00 Lumber/Hardware
14948 GTE California 8.228.63 Telephone Services
14949 George Yardley Co. 1.193.67 Lab Supplies
14950 Getinge Castle 936.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance
14951 Giedich-Mitchell, Inc. 2,816.10 Pump Supplies
14952 WIN Grainger Inc. 3,021.90 Compressor Supplies
14953 Graseby STI 2,106.75 Engine Supplies
14954 Grating Pacific, Inc. 2,444-85 Fiberglass Grating
14955 Graybar Electric Company 2,707.88 Electrical Supplies
14956 Great American Printing Co. 1,267.58 Printing Service
14957 G.W. Maintenance 120.00 Pump Maintenance
14958 David P. Halverson 2,475.00 Computer Loan
14959 Hamilton Company 5,791.13 Lab Supplies
14960 Harcourt Brace 75.70 Publication
14961 Harrington Industrial Plastics 1,320.01 Plumbing Supplies
14962 Harvard Business Review 155.00 Subscription
14963 Hatch 8 Kirk, Inc. 2,156.70 Truck Supplies
14964 Hoerbiger Service, Inc. 1,609.91 Compressor Parts
14965 Home Depot 436.07 Small Hardware
14966 Hopkins Technical Products 3,320.30 Pump Supplies
14967 Hub Auto Supply 34.88 Truck Parts
14968 loan 167.57 Lab Supplies
14969 Industrial Hearing&Pulmonary 6,590.00 On-Site Audiometric Testing
14970 Industrial Threaded Products 141A8 . Connectors
11/9198 2:09 PM Page 5 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.xia
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid From 10116/98 to 10131198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
14971 Information For Public Affairs 165.00 Online Service
14972 Information Resources 100.00 Personnel Services
14973 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 579.48 Lab Supplies
14974 Inside EPA 1,605.00 Subscription
14975 Interstate Battery Systems 254.07 Batteries
14976 Irvine Ranch Water District 48.10 Water Use
14977 IBM Corporation 667.23 Service Contract
14978 IBM Corporation 6,075.37 Service Contract
14979 IPCO Safety-Ca 667.19 Safety Supplies
14980 ISA 56.00 Publication
14981 J.G. Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,055.58 Instrument Supplies
14982 Jay's Catering 548.01 Director's Meeting Expense
149B3 Jendham, Inc. 338.00 Subscription
14984 Jensen Instruments Co. 3,474.23 Gauge
14985 Jobs Available, Inc. 119,60 Notices&Ads
14986 John Lisee Pumps 3,774.47 Pump Supplies
14987 Johnstone Supply 668.67 Electrical Supplies
14988 JLMC, Inc. 2,558.64 Tour Platform @ Trickling Filters
14989 K.P. Lindstrom 5,157.75 Envir.Consulting Services MO 12-9-90
14990 Kaman Industrial Technologies 39.63 Mechanical Supplies
14991 Kelar Training Centers 395.00 Registration Fees
14992 Kelly Paper 63.42 Paper
14993 Knox Industrial Supplies 2.294.59 Tools
14994 Lab Safety Supply,lnc. 1,794.69 Safety Supplies
14995 Lab Support 2,475.00 Temporary Employment Services
14996 Law/Crandall 456.00 Soil Testing 7-13-94
14997 Leadership Directories, Inc. 36.00 Subscription
14998 Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. 6,115.00 Architectural Services
14999 Lustre-Cal 964.63 Safety Supplies
15000 M. E. Silbemlann Co. 5,445.65 Sewer Repair
15001 Maintenance Technology Corp. 389.09 Welding Supplies
15002 Masune Company 222.75 Safety Supplies
16003 Mc Junkin Corp. 646.50 Plumbing Supplies
15004 McKenna Engineering& Equipment 652.59 Pump Supplies
15005 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 1,214.38 Tools
15006 Melles Griot Optical 849.00 Office Supplies
15007 Mellon Trust 16,083.34 Investment Custodian Bank
15008 Mesa Muffler 348.00 Truck Supplies
1119198 2:09 PM Page 6 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98 As
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid From 10/16/98 to 10131/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
15009 Metier, Inc. 9,000.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Data Integration Project
15010 Tri Pole CorplMicroAge 3,260.97 Software
15011 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 6,718.38 Mechanical Repairs
15012 Milltronics, Inc. 457.62 Electrical Supplies
15013 Mission Uniform Service 3.932.25 Uniform Rentals
15014 Mission Abrasive Supplies 154.95 Gloves
15015 Monitor Labs, Inc. 1.699.99 Instruments
15016 Peter M. Morrison 617.05 Training Expense Reimb.
15017 Morton Salt 549.63 Salt
15018 Motion Industries 263.15 Pump Supplies
15019 MotoPhoto 48.86 Photographic Services
15020 MGD Technologies, Inc. 1,000.00 Maintenance Agreement
15021 MPS Photographic Services 44.18 Water System Maint.Agreement
15022 Nat West Markets 1,000.00 COP Letter of Credit Fees
15023 National Microcomp Services 2,045.00 Service Agreement
15024 National Plant Services, Inc. 13.419.40 Vacuum Truck Services
15025 National Safety Council 500.00 Safety Film Rentals
15026 National Technology Transfer 3,940.00 Training Registration
15027 Newark Electronics 73.98 Instrument Supplies
15028 Nickey Petroleum Co. Inc. 8,203.82 Lubricant/Diesel Fuel
15029 Nico Mak Computing 770.00 Software
15030 NWRI Microfiltration II 195.00 Registration Fees
15031 Office Depot Business Services 2,223.95 Once Supplies
15032 Olsten Staffing Service, Inc. 3.290.00 Temporary Employment Services
15033 Robert Dolan 303.23 Meeting Expense Reimb.
15034 Operation Technology, Inc. 994.75 Computer Software
15035 Oracle Corporation 3,857.45 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement
15036 Oxygen Service Company 1,836.91 Specialty Gases
15037 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 144.82 Electrical Supplies
15038 Pacific Bell 2,328.68 Telephone Services
15039 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1,367.08 Plumbing Supplies
15040 Pacific Parts and Controls, Inc. 11,204.65 Instrument Supplies
1 SG41 Padre Janitorial Supplies 241.60 Janitorial Supplies
15042 Pagenet 1,737.76 Pager Services
15043 Parts Unlimited 161.35 Truck Supplies
15044 Pinnacle One 540.00 Registration Fees
15045 Precision Backhoe 985.00 Equipment Rental
15046 Progressive Business Publication 230.00 - Subscription
1119198 2:09 PM Page 7 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98..s
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid From 10116198 to 10/31/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
15047 Prosum Information Technologies 150.00 Consulting Service-Intranet Frontpage'98
15048 PCS Express 105.00 Courier Service
15049 0 Air•Calif. Div. Pump Engineer 786.00 Pump Supplies
15050 R&R Instrumentallon, Inc. 62.12 Electrical Supplies
15051 R.L.Abbott&Associates 8.000.00 Kern County Blosolids Consulting Services
15052 Ray Ashworth, C.P.A. 10.00 Refund of Overpayment for Plans&Secificalions
15053 Reliaslar 23,612.66 Life Insurance Premium
15054 Reliastar Bankers Security Life 13.291.38 Life Insurance Premium
15055 Remedy 4,411.70 Temporary Employment Services
15056 Adriana Renescu 1,247.69 Meeting Expense Reimb.
15057 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 110.00 Auto Repair
15058 RM Controls 38.91 Instrument Supplies
15059 RS Hughes Co., Inc. 516.17 Paint Supplies
15060 Safety-Kleen 60.00 Service Agreement
15061 Sea Coast Designs, Inc. 39.00 Lab Supplies
15002 City of Seal Beach 178.96 Water Use
15063 Second-Sun 1.096.85 Light Fixtures
15064 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 416.74 Tools
15065 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 4,421.34 Tools/Hardware
15066 Siemon, Larsen&Marsh 8,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management
15067 Sievers 920.50 Lab Supplies
15068 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 168.04 Lab Supplies
15069 Skyline Displays of Orange County 96.98 Halogen Light Set
15070 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 865.91 Plumbing Supplies
15071 Snap-On Incorporated 36.65 Tools
15072 Southern California Trans Service 10,880.00 Electrical Supplies
15073 Sparkletts 2,131.68 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
15074 Specialized Products 1.826.24 Network Test Equipment
15075 Sprint 43.05 Long Distance Telephone Service
15078 Standard and Poors Corp. 2,500.00 COP Contract Service
15077 State Board Of Equalization 208.61 Underground Fuel Storage Fee
15078 State Chemical Mfg. Co. 896.40 Janitorial Supplies
15079 Summit Steel 4,585.31 Metal
15080 Sunrise Environmental Scientific 200.83 Auto Supplies
15081 Sunset Ford 283.38 Truck Supplies
15082 Super Chem Corporation 670.80 Chemicals
15063 Super Ice Corporation 127.27 Lab Supplies
15084 Super Power Products 371.74 Janitorial Supplies
1119198 2:09 PM Page 8 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.xls
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid From 10/16198 to 10131/98
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
15085 Systems Integrated 19,800.00 Construction Services-J-31-3
16086 SARBS-CWEA 30,00 Annual Meeting
15087 SHRM 160.00 Annual Membership Renewal
15088 Teledyne Eletronic Tech. 164.45 Instrument Parts
15089 Foxboro Company 853.38 Instrument Supplies
15090 The Register 1,832.60 Notices&Ads
15091 Tomell &Cotten 1.278.50 Legal Services
15092 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 103.07 Truck Supplies
15093 Truesdell Laboratories, Inc. 352.00 Lab Services
15094 Unocal 76 13.34 Permit Fee Refund
15095 Valley Cities Supply Company 1,150.54 Plumbing Supplies
15096 Veme's Plumbing 636.80 Plumbing Supplies
15097 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 18,793.41 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No: C-044
15098 VWR Scientific Products 582.95 Lab Supplies
15099 The Wackenhut Corporation 3,041.52 Security Guards
15100 Water Environment Federation 260.00 Professional Development Courses
15101 Waxis Sanitary Supply 680.66 Janitorial Supplies
15102 Western Metro Unit 599.74 Filters
15103 Moyasar T.Yahya 754.05 Meeting Expense Reimb.
15104 Yokogawa Ind.Automation 129.11 Instrument Supplies
15105 3T Equipment Company 168.49 PSI Wire Reinforced Hose
15106 Juan J.Ambriz 253.96 Training Expense Reimb.
15107 Nicholas J.Amontes 293.27 Training Expense Reimb.
15108 Mark Castillo 1,441.16 Meeting Expense Reimb.
15109 Chloe D. Dee 329.34 Meeting Expense Relmb.
15110 Kevin L. Hadden 1,468.36 Training Expense Reimb.
15111 Donald F. McIntyre 1,705.07 Meeting Expense Reimb.
15112 Kathleen T. Millea 504.71 Training Expense Reimb.
15113 Michael D. Moore 1,336.51 Meeting Expense Reimb.
15114 Robert Ooten 1,380.21 Meeting Expense Reimb.
15115 Voided Check - -
15116 Robed C.Thompson 901.49 Meeting Expense Relmb.
15117 Michelle Tuchman 46.05 Cellular Expense Reimb.
15118 State Board of Equalization 250.00 Underground Fuel Storage Fee
15119 Orange County Sanitation District 892.45 Petty Cash Reimb.
15120 LA Cellular Telephone Company 75.47 Cellular Telephone Service
15121 State Board of Equalization 250.00 Underground Fuel Storage Fee
15122 County of Orange 3,915.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin.
11/9/98 2:23 PM Page 9 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10.31.98.xh
Orange County Sanitation District
Claims Paid From 10116198 to 10131198
Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description
Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 2,786,625.72
Payroll Disbursements
11266-11411 Employee Paychecks $ 189,458A8 Biweekly Payroll 10121/98
11412.11426 Employee Paycheck 2,343.79 Shift Differential Adjustments
11427 Employee Paycheck 241.78 Accrual Payout
31500-31941 Direct Deposit Statements 629.372,91 Biweekly Payroll 10121/98
Total Payroll Disbursements $ 821,416.96
Wire Transfer Payments
None
Total Claims Paid 10116198-10131198 $ 3,608,042.68
11/9198 2.09 PM Page 10 of 10 Claims Paid Report 10-31-98.x1s
DRAFT
MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, October 28, 1998 at 5 p.m.
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was
held on Wednesday, October 28, 1998 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative
Office.
(1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT:
Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Board (part-time) Shawn Boyd, Seal Beach Alternate Director
Peer Swan, Vice Chair of the Board Norm Eckenrode, Director
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Charles Egigian-Nichols, Consultant
Jan Debay, Chair, PDC Committee Ryal Wheeler, OCSO Employee
George Brown, Chair, FAHR Committee
John Collins, Past Chairman of the Boards STAFF PRESENT:
Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Directors Absent: Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager
Bill Steiner, County Supervisor Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
Bob Ghirelli, Director of Tech. Services
Ed Hodges, Director of GSA
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Mike Petennan, Director of Human Resources
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Jim Herberg, Planning Manager
Mike Moore, ECM Manager
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
Vice Chair Peer Swan was appointed Chair pro tem in the absence of Chair Dunlap, who arrived
at 6 p.m.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
(4) 'RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting of September 23, 1998 were
approved as drafted.
OCSD • PO Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127 . (714) %2-2411
i
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 2
October 28, 1998
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
There was no report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre asked to add an item to the Closed Session agenda, and General
Counsel also asked that the pending Walcon litigation be added to the Closed Session agenda. It was
moved, seconded and passed that the measures were of an urgent nature, and that they be added to
the Closed Session agenda for discussion.
(7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel did not make a report.
(8) STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Early Retirement Opportunity
The General Manager updated the Committee on the results of this program to date, and
recommended that it again be presented to the Board in January for the effective period of
January through May 1999.
Action: This item will be added to the December Steering Committee agenda with a
detailed report for additional discussion.
C. Ranking Procedures for FY 99-00 Capital Improvement Projects
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, reported that a team has been farmed to develop a
methodology to screen new projects and prioritize them for the next CIP budget in an effort
to streamline and standardize the process. Subjectivity should not be eliminated from the
process.
Action: Staff was directed to bring a 'project' back to the Steering Committee that has been
run through the criteria.
D. Orange County Millenium Book
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, reported on an outreach opportunity
through the County of Orange's Millenium Book. The Steering Committee directed staff to
purchase a single page at the rate of$3,000.
E. Agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation re Operation of the Compressed Natural Gas
Station
Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, discussed this project, which will
be dedicated this Friday, October 30. An agreement for accessing computer usage data
and the user-billing function is required. Signage and marketing activities also have to be
worked out. Any signage will require City of Fountain Valley approval.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 3
October 28, 1998
Action: The agenda item drafted for the Steering Committee will be revised to include
information on other firms, besides Pickens Fuel Corp., that can also perform these
functions and submitted to the OMTS Committee in November for action.
F. Directors Workshop on Personnel Issues
Don McIntyre asked the Steering Committee members to consider scheduling a Directors
workshop in an effort to effect the culture changes needed to educate the full Board on the
compensation issues involved in re-engineering the District—where we came from, where
we are, and where we are heading—and resulting in a clear direction on how to achieve our
goals.
Action: The Steering Committee scheduled a special meeting on Wednesday,
November 18, at 3 p.m. to discuss this one issue in Closed Session. If consensus is
reached, a Directors Workshop on the issue will be held on Saturday, November 21. The
regular 8 p.m, Steering Committee meeting will not be held to allow sufficient time to discuss
this major issue.
B. Kern County Proposed Biosolids Ordinance
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, updated the members on the Kern County
biosolids issue as well as the three alternatives available to the District. The draft MOU was
discussed. Blake will be providing a brief update to all of the Directors at the Board meeting.
Action: The Steering Committee passed a motion to support the numbers in the draft MOU.
A related item that staff was previously asked to consider—the possibility of purchasing land
for a composting site—was also discussed. Biosolids consultant, Charles Egigian-Nichols,
described an available parcel in Kem County that could be converted to a composting site,
and outlined some of the other issues required to operate a composting operation.
Action: The OMITS Committee shall consider forming a subcommittee at its next meeting to
discuss this idea in more detail before taking any further action.
G. The list of action items scheduled for consideration by the working committees in November
was reviewed. The FAHR Committee will not be meeting in November.
1. Proposed Addendum 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with CDM re Strategic
Plan, Phase 2. Treatment. Reuse and Disposal Facilities, Job No. J-40.3. Dave Ludwin
reported that most of the work included in this addendum has already been completed
because it was additional effort on contract items, not new work. He recognized and
apologized for the lapse in program management and has developed safeguards to
prevent this from happening again. The addendum and the new safeguards will be
discussed in detail at the November PDC Committee meeting.
(9) OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There were no other business, communications, or supplemental agenda items.
Minutes of the Steering Committee Meeting
Page 4
October 28, 1998
(10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
There were none.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
(12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 18, 1998 at 3 P.m.
(13) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session. The Committee voted to forward the agendized items directly to the
Closed Session in tonight's Board meeting.
(14) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:31 p.m.
Submitted by:
J n Tappan
S16aring Committee Secretary
NWp EY�*WMERM'E CWMII1EflOBIO MMOW SC Minube.Ea
4
r
pd
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
Orange County Sanitation District
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1998 - 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on November 4, 1998, in the District's Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Directors Present: Others Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Toby Weissert, Corollo Engineers
James Ferryman, Vice Chair
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Staff Present:
Don Bankhead
John Collins, Past Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
Anna Piercy Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Charles E. Sylvia Ed Hodges, Director General Services Admin.
Gary Streed, Director Finance
Directors Absent: Bob Ooten, Director Operations and Maintenance
Patrick Miles, Director Information Technology
Bumie Dunlap, Board Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director Technical Services
Steve Anderson Michelle Tuchman, Director Communications
Margie L. Rice Frankie Woodside, Committee Secretary
Ed Torres, Air Quality &Special Projects Manager
Mike Moore, ECM Manager
Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager
Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialists
Jerry Jones, O&M Maintenance Manager
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
Ocso 0 P.o.ik.8127 • Fo Uin Vanes,cn 9272"127 0 (714)962-2411
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 2
November 4, 1998
RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MINUTES
The minutes of the October 14, 1998 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR (McGuigan)
Chair McGuigan congratulated Ed Hodges on the successful opening dedication ceremonies
held on Friday, October 30, 1998, for the CNG station.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER (McIntyre)
Peer Swan and myself are meeting with Bill Lane of Crow Winthrop, on Friday, November 6,
1998, to discuss the possibility of avoiding a potential lawsuit.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (Anderson)
Update on item MTS98-032 Kern County Biosolids Ordinance and Road Mitigation Fee
Agreement: Kern County Board of Supervisors have deferred all of the fees related to biosolids
truck inspection fees and road mitigation fees for later consideration when they take up the
issue of the final version of their Biosolids Ordinance. This will be occurring sometime in the
first quarter of 1999. They've also referred the entire issue of biosolids to their technical
advisory committee (known as the Biosolids Ordinance Advisory Committee) to take into
consideration the various regulatory issues surrounding the Ordinance as well as the issue of
the fees. Existing biosolids application sites will continue to be regulated under the terms of the
interim ordinance in the meantime. Our largest contractor in Kern County, Pima Gro, elected to
not apply for permits for any of its existing biosolids application sites and, as a result, they are
no longer hauling any biosolids to Kern County. They are now hauling instead to Riverside and
San Diego Counties for the same dollar per ton charge to us.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (Hodges)
The Director of General Services Administration did not make a report.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Miles)
Update on item OMTS98-030 Year 2000 Date Change Compliance Report: Staff is still working
diligently on this project.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (Ooten)
The Director of Operations and Maintenance did not make a report.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 3
November 4, 1998
O&M Monthly Report
Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report: The previous month's report was submitted to the
OMTS Committee for review. This report focuses on compliance, safety, financial data and
performance measures for O& M and is intended to provide Committee members with
information on a timely basis. Also included in this report is the DART Implementation Status
Report.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES (Ghirelll)
Technical Services submitted an application to the State Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB)for$500,000, to conduct a Dairy Washwater Sewering Project. This application is
part of a larger watershed package submitted by the Santa Ana River Watershed Group,
Technical Services has just learned that the State Board has tentatively approved funding for
the sewering project.
Technical Services has received and will respond to a survey from the SWRCB asking us to tell
them what our plans are concerning the Y2K program.
OCWD has offered us a couple of seats on a tour they're conducting of their Wetlands Project at
Prado Dam on Friday, November 20, 1998, from 8:30 a.m. to noon. If anyone would like to
attend please let me know.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
DISCUSSION ITEM(S)
1. OMTS98-034 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY FUELING AGREEMENT
Motion:
Moved, seconded and duly carried to authorize the General Manger to
enter into an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley to allow the
City to use our diesel and unleaded fueling station at Plant 1.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 4
November 4, 1998
2. OMTS98-035 AGREEMENT WITH PICKENS FUEL CORPORATION FOR THE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CNG REFUELING
STATION
Motion:
Moved, seconded and duly carried to authorize the General Manager to
enter into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation for the
Operation and Maintenance of the CNG Refueling Station.
3. OMTS98-036 COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM GUIDANCE REVIEW
COMMITTEE UPDATE
Motion:
Information only.
4. OMTS98-037 1998-99 OPERATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM AND STATUS
Motion:
Information only.
5. OMTS98-038 AGREEMENT FOR OPTION TO PURCHASE 640-ACRE SITE FOR
BIOSOLIDS COMPOSTING
Motion:
1. Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend to the Board to
authorize the General Manager to enter into an exclusive agreement
with Global Security Complex for an option to purchase a 640-acre
site in Kern County, for an amount not to exceed $62,400, in a form
approved by the General Counsel.
2. Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend to the Board to
authorize the General Manager to initiate and conduct due diligence
research of said 640-acre site for use as a biosolids composing
facility and for composting of other related feedstock including
manure, green waste, food wastes and other agriculture residues, in
an amount not to exceed $100,000.
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 5
November4, 1998
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING
The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for
December 2, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Director McGuigan will not be able to attend this meeting and
has asked that Director Ferryman chair this meeting in her absence.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
Submitted by:
Jl VLlll� At 'cc(\�lA C
Franlde Woodside
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Secretary
H-..\wp dtalagenda\OMr$t1998\MinutesU I 98 Minutes d.
OMTS COMMITTEE MeebngDate To�e/tS
11/04/98 i//idlyd
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Nunite
911-034
Orange County Sanitation District J
FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration l W
SUBJECT: CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY FUELING AGREEMENT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley to
allow the City to use our diesel and unleaded fueling station at Plant 1.
SUMMARY
The City of Fountain Valley is in the process of relocating their City maintenance yard and has
asked if they could use our gasoline and diesel fueling facility at Plant 1 until their yard is
complete. They anticipate that they will need to use our facility from December 1, 1998 to June
1999 upon the completion of their maintenance yard.
Staff is working with General Counsel in developing a fueling agreement with the City that will
result in the District recovering the cost of fuel and any program administration costs (is: cost to
bill the City, wear and tear on the facility, etc.). It is anticipated that the contract will include the
cost of fuel, plus 15% to cover the administrative costs.
During the term of the agreement,the City will have access to our facility and fuel island on a
24-hour per day basis. Staff will issue card keys that will allow the City police staff to have
access to our plant during off shift times. Staff will also issue a Personal Identification Number
(PIN)that the City staff can use to access the fuel pumps. The PIN will allow us to capture the
actual amount of fuel used in each of the City vehicles and will allow us to prepare our billing
report to the City.
Diesel and unleaded gasoline usage is paid for out of the District's Joint Operating budget,
under a blanket purchase order. Fuel is ordered when the tanks are low.
Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will present a verbal report on this
item.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
This project will pay for itself and as a result is budget neutral.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section , page )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
H\WP dialgeaW1MOdgeMOMTS1Nov Agenda RaMd OATS.F Poemp Nreemem Ga Paget
Since Staff budgeted $140,000 under the Miscellaneous Chemicals, Gasoline, Diesel and Oil
portion in this year's fiscal JO budget. Since the City of Fountain Valley will reimburse the
District for the use of any gasoline and diesel fuel, the expenditure of these funds should have a
minimal effect on the budget.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Staff is working with General Counsel to prepare an agreement with the City of Fountain Valley.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Not to proceed with the Agreement with the City of Fountain Valley.
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
EEH: fw
H My m�WMlOIa]W`OMfSVb+Igwffi PeOa OMrS.N Fui9 Mw^M.Eac PBrp 2
OMTS MmUng Date ToJtem.
11/04/98 /r/d' J'
AGENDA REPORT Item NUM M Item Number
98-035 „ "d I
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration zr>�
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH PICKENS FUEL CORP FOR THE OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF THE CNG REFUELING STATION
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corporation for
the Operation and Maintenance of the CNG Refueling Station.
SUMMARY
The District's CNG Refueling Station is due to become operational in November 1998. Staff
believes that it would be to the best interest of the District to outsource the Operation and
Maintenance of the station. Additionally, staff believes that Pickens Fuel Corp. is best suited to
take over the operation and maintenance function.
Pickens Fuel Corp. is a California corporation that owns or manages more than 40 CNG
stations in California and the greater Phoenix, Arizona area. They are the largest natural gas
fuel suppliers in the United States, with sales of more than 5 million gallons annually. They
process more than 3,000 transactions each day and bill more than 1,000 customers each
month.
Some of their fleet customers include the United States Postal Service, United Parcel Service,
SunLine Transit, SuperShuttle, Waste Management, City of Irvine and the US Marine Corp.
Under the terms of the agreement, Pickens Fuel Corp. will conduct all scheduled maintenance
as required on the compressor skid/controls, gas dryer, two fuel dispensers and 2 card readers.
The estimated monthly cost for weekly service to these pieces of equipment is $900 per month,
plus parts. Staff assumed that this work would be outsourced when they prepared the original
Performs analysis and included a fee of$20,000 in year 1 and $18,000 in subsequent years to
cover this cost. The monies to pay for this work would come from the sale of CNG to public and
private fleets.
Additionally, Pickens will also operate the station for the District. Under the terms of this portion
of the agreement, Pickens would provide all of the training, issue credit applications and fuel
cards, take care of all billing and market the station to both public and private sector fleets. The
cost to provide these services will be $0.10 per gallon for all sales at the District station.
Attached for your guidance and review is the Performs analysis showing the cost impact of
entering into an agreement with Pickens. Please note that the CNG station still has a positive
cash flow, which will only increase, with the increase in marketing effort by Pickens Fuel Corp.
In October, staff brought the concept of entering into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corp to
the Steering Committee for their information. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services
Administration, will report on the outcome of the meeting with the Steering Committee and be
prepared to present a verbal report on this item.
HbPNe`yFF IM.V FNLT-FUEIIPICMNMW ,PpFMFReµv10MT5-PFC.E Page t
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The CNG refueling station is designed to pay for itself. The cost to operate and maintain the
station will come from the proceeds of selling CNG to public and private Fleets.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section , page )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Staff is working with General Counsel to prepare an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corp.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Not to enter into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corp.
2. Not to enter into an agreement with Pickens Fuel Corp and to market the use of the station
using District staff to other governmental agencies and the public.
3. Do not provide allow the sale of CNG to the public.
4. Prepare a RFP for the outsourcing of the Operation and Maintenance of the facility.
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Performa Analysis on the CNG Refueling Station showing the addition of outsourcing the
Operation and Maintenance.
EEH: fw
HWy.�10 dI WTiMLWICI N"w�N WTa-PFL.Ez Paget
Perlmms AMlyels 010 Loatla N V-10 LO kDA
1012]I988:10 '-
CSDOC NG STATION
INCOME STATEMENT Year Yeer2 Year Year4 YWWS Yesr5 YearT Yeare Year9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Yeer13 Yasr14 YBer15
Annual Loatl gB gall4ney6-HAULERS 140.40 140A0 140.40 140.40 2]A.60 22/.84 994.04 224.84 T24.04 280.80 2%.00 280.60 230.80 MAD 280.80
Armual Load(M gallon")-OCSO ____ 5.90 620 6.50 8.83 )d]_ T.53 7.91 SW 8.90 030 8.30 8.30- 8.30
Annual I.Hd(M ga0ur W)-CITIES _ _ 50.00 52.50 SSd9 5].BB 6788 5].88 5]AS 5788 fi].BB 57.% 57.BB 57.88 57 88 57.88
Annual LOetl(bt Hons"-OTHER 5.00 526 5.51 5.79 8.08 0.38 0.70 ).MO 7.99 ].]B 8.14 8,55
_TOTAL ANNUAL LOAD WAS 190A0 198.80 20S.T2 29T28 2%.00 296.48 29GA3 2%.81 353.60 354.02 354.37 354.74 355.13 355.53
Station Recoery-HAULERS(E1.048/gap 191.O9 191.93 199.A 20).]9 2%.l2_ 2%.91 298.81 297.58 28BR6 355.92 30 5 35841 358.48 356.07 357.20
Sta0on Reawary-OCSDDI .0491gaq -- 6.19 am 0.02 7.16 7.52 7.90 829 0.71 8]1 8]t 5.71 8.71 8.71
Stadcn Recovery-CRIES($1.0421gal)__ __ _ 5025 52]fi 0.40 U-10 M 16 58.16 50.16 HIS 58.16_ 58.16 68.15 58.18 58.18
Station Recoery_-OTHER($10191ga$___. ___ 5.W 528 5.54 5.82 6.11 6A1 B.T4 7.W - 7.42 759- 8.18 8.59
TOTAL STATON RECOVERY _ 141.09 241.58 250.72 2]4.% 365.98 38).10 %8.43 389.T5 3)146 429.52 d29.)0 430.40 431.16 431.93 432]4
_. - -
StadonE4penaea:_ (Et,%01 . . ..._
COmmotllry )E023Me1m) _ _ _ 3229 42.)9 13A3 K36 18.71 I&n 18.86 18.92 19.00 8125 21.42 21.81 81AS BL68 - 21.])
7.55
Taxes(kaulerarel ( (e0rers-$.1 t])_. ____._,_. ___ 5.80_12.45 _ 13.95 14.%._ 18.➢1 11.T] 11.85 1IM 11.00 14.15 1410 14.01 14.19 14.21 91.%
so Inheart
DemanE ($0.04Rs($0. _ _ _ 5_92 7.62._._. ].89 6.27 11.48 11]9 26.59 HAS 1L8) 14A5 1d.18 14.1] 31.93 31.96 143E
$c CalTmo pmolnien COek($o.09Menn) ._ _ - 9.83 . 1).14 1].89 1&fi0 26A8_28.00 18.00 ism 28.00 31.00 31.% 31.09 91.83 18.00 _92.00
Fi4ml luers Fue MairMnance 20.00 18." 19.89 1s.% 20.13 20A9 29.55 18.90 29.00 10Ao 36A0 18.00 18.% MAD 35AS
Pkkena Fuel Corp operation($O.f0lgalbn) 19.00 12.21 12.83 2&8] 18.1 18.0 29.59 29.61 26.08 36.3] 26AM 22.72 22A7 2E.61 JSSS
POWrarux, 9_00 1221 10.00 19R5 1a.( 10.% 16.8a 1&BB 10.00 22.BT 20.00 22.0E 22J4 22.]8 M.72
kaursnce _ _ _ __ _ 0.00 0.00- o.00 0.00- e.MM D.% a.MM D.aD o.DM o.%- a.eM 0.00-o.DD D.oe o.%
. _ TOTAL F_kPENSEB 97.37 130.29 135.62 140.70 1%.94 191.21 191.71 192.1E 192.50 226.09 225.91 Y25.53 225A 228.0E 22B.2B
20 NET INCOME (E1,000) 4371 2J10 1 111.34 1 . 3J.95 175.05 175.% 176.72 1T].63 1]8.5) &B3 20429 204s) 205A8 205.91 308.4]
HAULING COST SAVINGS ($l,%0) _ Sd.% 54.00 54.08 U.% _ 80463 86.53 86.53 %.53 0.53 108.16 108.16 108.10 1%.16 108.16 10848
CUMMULAWENETINCOME (51,%0) W]9 283.21 "029 028442 589.99 1152.30 1416.89 16)9]9 1844.90 22%.B9 2569.54 2882.5) 31%11 3510.18 J824.80
CASHFLOWSTATEMENT_- - -- -- -- --'_-- --
NET INCOME (31,000) ___ g].)9 289.21 94D.39 62&42 889.89 1152.39 1tl8.84 18T9.]9 1%4.% 2258.89 95BB.56 2882.5] 31%.11 3510.10 382480
Cask Flew 97.79 263.21 d4029 SM442 889.99 1152.39 141SAPI 1679.79 1944.% MNAS 2%&54 2882.517 31911.11 3510.10 384MAD
Payback A%lysla@E12m -11%29 4190 T 4113.0 426A6 -38d:09 -101.0 .161.58 40.71 e9D02 : 1002.011 1616ABI IUBAQ1 IW21131 2200.10 2.11
inlet401ced y,4d yaAveek,WgaW6
52 vek".,.aef IAA DOE lecler tar
years 14,16 katls tar"am&a aM ---
20 Wall;W years 10-1 B.
oche 2-kauMn coat saNrge$1A aflOW _
age
OMTS COMMITTEE MeeengDate To ad.ofDlr.
11/4/98 1 11/18/98
AGENDA REPORT Item Number I Item Nu ber
ie lei
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Originator: Michael D. Moore, Environmental Compliance and Monitoring
Manager
SUBJECT: Agreement for Option to Purchase 640-Acre Site for Biosolids Composting
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into an exclusive agreement with Global
Security Complex, for the option to purchase their 640-acre site in Kern County for
an amount not to exceed $62,400 in a form approved by the General Counsel.
2. Authorize the General Manager to initiate and conduct due diligence research of this
site for the use as a biosolids composting facility and for composting of other related
feedstocks including manure, green waste, food wastes, and other agricultural
residues in an amount not to exceed $100.000.
SUMMARY
Recent events in Kern County, California, with respect to a County ordinance governing
the land application of biosolids have resulted in significant concern by the District's
staff over the stability of its program for land application of Class B biosolids. Although a
Cost-Sharing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between OCSD and Kern County
appears imminent, there continue to be several unsettling issues with respect to Class B
biosolids land application in Kern County. Consideration of the draft ordinance by the
Kern County Biosolids Ordinance Advisory Committee (BOAC) will commence on
October 28, 1998. This committee was recently expanded to include the vocal-farming
opponents to Class B biosolids land application. Recommendations from the BOAC are
anticipated after the first of the year. Recent meetings with certain farming interests in
Kern County indicate a willingness to reach consensus on how best to have biosolids
and Kern County agriculture coexist.
Not-withstanding these positive steps, the Directors advised OCSD staff to commence
assessing other biosolids management alternatives including buying land. Utilizing
existing staff and consulting resources, we have identified what appears to be an
exceptional land purchase opportunity. In southwestern Kern County a 640-acre, one
square mile, parcel is available on the market at an asking price of just less than
$2,000,000. For the land alone this price equals $3,108 per acre. The isolated site
includes numerous infrastructure improvements (partial list below) valued at more than
$12,000,000 installed. The prior owner was the Rockwell Corporation who used the
property for microwave testing and B-2 bomber development. The site was evaluated
for environmental hazards by the Radon Corporation prior to the sale to the present
H%'ryd g.MMlBg6 Mm�,d Age nd.Fepx %lII$44ee IN*)A4
Rw. � Page 1
owner and was allegedly Geared of any hazardous contamination. The site key features
include:
♦ Two airport runways, one at 3,200' x 200' and one at 2,800' x 60'
♦ Two helicopter landing pads with total area of 6,300 square feet
♦ 2.1 miles of asphalt roadway plus excellent local road access
♦ Fully chain link fenced
♦ Electrical power single and triple phase 110, 220, and 440 volt
♦ Three buildings with floor space in excess of 21,000 square feet all served by
existing water and sewer utilities. The largest building is an administrationlclassroom
facility with over 12,000 square feet in 3-stories. A 6,400 square foot hangar building
fully insulated and air-conditioned. A 2,500 square foot control tower equivalent to a
six-story building including office and bathroom space.
• Deep potable water well with operating pump, 12,000 gallon storage tank and
installed fire fighting distribution system charged by 12" main pipelines ending in 4"
pipelines at hydrant locations.
♦ Developed portions of the facility consume about 140-acres leaving about 500 acres
for other uses such as composting.
♦ The site was graded to an average slope of 4%, ideal for storm water drainage
control. Because of past activities on the site, there are no conflicts with endangered
or threatened species.
♦ The site has existing County Conditional Use Permits (CUP) allowing operation of
the airport, related industrial uses, mobile home park, law enforcement training,
civilian target shooting, and paint ball recreation. A new CUP would be needed to
launch compost operations. A fast-track CUP based on a mitigated negative
declaration could be obtained in 90-days. If an environmental impact report were
required the permitting process could be achieved within 180 to 210 days. These
timeframes would accommodate obtaining permits from the Regional Water Quality
Control Board and the Integrated Waste Management Board. Once obtained, a CUP
is held in perpetuity.
The composting opportunity on this site is excellent and substantial. Over 400 acres of
the site are suitable for windrow composting. Using conservative assumptions regarding
process operations and product marketing opportunities, the site has a capacity to take
in and process about 1,200,000 tons per year of organic matter. The total annual OCSD
production of biosolids is less than 200,000 tons per year and could be fully
accommodated by the operation. If operating at rapacity, composting would transform
the feedstock into about 720,000 tons per year of various grade compost products.
A preliminary pro forma for the facility was developed. Key assumptions in the analysis
include that the facility is drawing in green waste, food waste, manure, food processing
waste and agricultural residues at current market values for feedstock, transportation
and product revenue and efficiently operated by a private firm. Also, in addition to the
property purchase price of up to $2 million, we estimate an additional $1.8 million is
needed for site improvements and operating equipment. Depending on site soil
conditions and their ability to be compacted an additional $1 million may be needed to
add a one-foot clay sealant layer to prevent any downward migration of compost
constituents.
w w.P.aaW mwrveoe�mn ame�w�Rawrs��ttemwn tIXH.m
a Page 2
The preliminary pro forma analysis shows that if the facility were operating at or near
capacity, it is highly likely the operation would substantially reduce OCSD's overall costs
of biosolids management away from the treatment plant while producing a Class A
biosolids product. Depending on market conditions, it may be possible for the District to
approach break-even on its biosolids. This preliminary pro forma did not include any
funds from operation of the airfield, related training and industrial facilities, or from the
potential to sell water associated with the property. In addition there is the real
possibility to lease portions of the land and infrastructure to entities such as the Forest
Service, law enforcement agencies, and small industrial facilities.
Due diligence on this site would include, at a minimum, work items such as title search,
property appraisal & valuation, site and infrastructure conditions verification including
environmental hazards, water rights research. In addition the permit approval
processes with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the California Integrated
Waste Management Board, and Kern County would have to be addressed and
preliminary compost facility engineering developed. It is estimated that this due
diligence will cost between $50,000 and $100,000.
The schedule to bring on-line this facility could be fast-tracked to occur in 6 to B months.
If feedstocks were brought to the site beginning mid-1999, the first compost products
would be ready for sale and distribution about 120 days later. If the ramp up period for
new feedstock is relatively short, 3 to 6 months, it is probable that the District's payback
will occur within 15-months of start-up.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
To secure the exclusive rights to the option to purchase this property and conduct our
needed due diligence, the property owner is willing to entertain an offer from the OCSD
for an option to purchase the parcel contingent upon all necessary research and other
appropriate conditions. The landowner requests the option be established at $10,400
per month, which covers current mortgage, operating expenses, and, property taxes.
Based on our current understanding of research and development requirements for this
property, we estimate the purchase option may need to extend for up to 6-months for a
total of$62,400. All of the purchase option funds would credit against the property
purchase. It is estimated that this due diligence will cost between $50,000 and
$100,000.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
HMy.C9bpaMvll�Jurit RmNFgenEv Repvb\1110BTXsn 1qe)M
Page 3
p I''
ALTERNATIVES \
CEQA FINDINGS
ATTACHMENTS
H My Cs�peMe\1pd8 Jtirf.&ury AooM.FepahI1116BTMn 1de14✓
"^°•° ° Page 4
DRAFT
MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN- AND CONSTRUCTION
COMMITTEE MEETING
Orange County Sanitation District
Thursday, November 5, 1998, at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange
County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, November 5, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., in
the District's Administrative Office.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Directors Present:
Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Jan Debay, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
John Collins, Past Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Brian Donahue John Linder, Construction Manager
Burnie Dunlap, Board Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
Eva Miner-Bradford Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Christina Shea Mark Esquer, Engineering Manager
Dave Sullivan Dean Fisher, Engineer
Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Gail Cain, Executive Assistant
Directors Absent: OTHERS PRESENT:
Patsy Marshall Craig Farrington, General Counsel
Bob Zemel Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers
(2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
OCSO • P.O.Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411
V
Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting
Page 2
November 5, 1998
(4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the October 8, 1998 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
(5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
(6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager reported that he and Director Swan had a meeting with Crow Winthrop on
Monday, November 2, 1998, to discuss their lawsuit.
(7) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager reported that on Tuesday, November 3, 1998, the Kern County
Supervisors waived all the fees regarding the roads and trucks. The fees and the long-term
ordinance will be taken under consideration the first quarter of 1999. They referred that matter to
their Technical Advisory Committee as part of the process they'll be discussing on the regulation of
biosolids. Next week, there will be discussions with the editorial board of the Bakersfield Californian.
We expect to see an editorial position of the local paper in a week.
(8) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
The Director of Engineering requested Committee's approval to issue a Change Order not to exceed
$100,000 to do grading for two storm water retention basins. Bids will be solicited from existing, on-
site contractors. It was the consensus of the Committee members that staff proceed with the change
order and do the work. Staff advised they would be taking bids, and that information would be
reported to the Committee members.
The Director of Engineering introduced the Engineering Manager,who updated the PDC Committee
on progress to date on Project P2-60, Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 2. The project is currently
between the 50% and 85% design points. Changes to the project scope have increased the
engineer's cost estimate from $7.3 million to $11.4 million. Differences in the cost estimate are due
to the addition of cake transfer pumps, new solids hopper sliding frame technology, pile foundation
requirements, and electrical upgrades. The project will be presented to the PDC Committee in
February 1999, when approval of the plans and specifications is expected to be requested.
(9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel did not make a report.
(10) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and
the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent (5%).
Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting
Page 3
November 5, 1998
(11) ACTION ITEMS (Items No. ac)
a. PDC98-44: Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at
Plants No. 1 and 2, Job No. P1-40-2R/P247-2R, with Margate Construction
for a net addition amount of$56,047 and 228 calendar days, increasing the
contract amount to$1,973,675.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve this item.
b. PDC98-45: Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with
Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic
Plan, Job No. J-Q-3, for additional planning and design services in the
amount of$293,022 for a total amount not to exceed $1,403,740.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried, with six yes and two
no votes, to recommend approval.
c. PDC98-46: Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement with
Carollo Engineers for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2A2, for an additional amount of$62,993, increasing
the total amount not to exceed $7,119,469.
Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
(12) CLOSED SESSION
The Committee Chair reported to the Committee the need for a closed session, as authorized by
Government Code Section 54956.9, in order to add one item needing immediate action that arose
subsequent to the publication of the agenda, to wit: Walcon Construction Co.. Inc. v. County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 782457. She
reported that the item could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) upon a
two-thirds' vote of the Committee. No other item would be discussed or acted upon.
Upon the unanimous vote of all members present to add an item to the agenda pursuant to
Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), the Committee convened in closed session at 6:30 p.m.
Confidential Minutes of the dosed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance
with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the
Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action
taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final.
At 6:45 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
(13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
None.
i
Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting
Page 4
November 5, 1998
(14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
None.
(15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
None.
(16) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
December 3, 1998.
(17) ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Submitted by:
ad t .-^.i
Gail Cain
PDC Committee Secretary
H:4vp.dta'enp1PDCIPDC98 W O W Anutes.dw
PDC COMMITTEE memna ox� rcx ads.
11/OS/9a 1111814
AGENDA REPORT HmmNumber RemNum r
pDe9a-V, C
Orange County Sanitation Di
FROM: David Ludw rector of Engineering
Originator: Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN PHASE 2, TREATMENT, REUSE AND
DISPOSAL FACILITIES, JOB NO. J-40-3, ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) WITH CAMP
DRESSER AND MCKEE, INC.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp
Dresser& McKee, Inc. for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-3,
for additional planning and design services in the amount of$293,022 for a total amount
not to exceed $1,403,740.
SUMMARY
Additional work has been required of Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM) to complete
Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan. The additional work includes revisions to Strategic Plan
documents, changes in planning assumptions, and additional support due to the
extended project schedule. This additional work is beyond the scope that was
envisioned when the PSA was amended in January 1998.
The majority of the additional effort was performed incrementally by CDM from May
through August 1998. Over time, the additional tasks accumulated and became
significant. Although staff realized that some of the work was out of scope, at the time
the work was being done, staff believed that sufficient consultant budget was available
to complete the work. CDM did not inform the District of the magnitude of the extra
work or the associated cost until September 1998. The fee for this additional work is
$236,11 B. As a good faith gesture, and to show their commitment as a team member
on the project, CDM has agreed to be compensated for the additional work at their cost
with no allowance for profit. This proposed increase also does not include $50,000 of
additional costs that CDM has incurred and agreed to write off and not attempt to
recover.
One of staffs project management responsibilities is to assure that the consultant's
work is completed within budget. We also require our consultants to keep our staff
informed as to the status of work efforts and budget compliance. We will continue to
stress the importance of proactive budget management to our project management staff
and our consultants. A comprehensive project management training program is in
Page 1
development that will address this issue. In the interim, our staff and supervisors have '
been instructed to provide a higher level of budget oversight and communication with
the PDC Committee and our Board of Directors.
For the remainder of this project, CDM will be required to provide monthly status reports
outlining project progress, budget compliance, and potential areas of concern. If
requested, the status report for the previous month can be reported to the Ad Hod
Steering Committee on a monthly basis. In addition to the Strategic Plan, all current
projects are being reviewed to assure that consultant progress reports are contractually
required and are being submitted.
In addition to the completed work, CDM has proposed future work necessary for
completion of the Strategic Plan including:
• Revising all volumes of the Strategic Plan to reflect the agency's name
change to Orange County Sanitation District. '
• Providing for additional review and revisions to Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) information.
• Providing continued project support, participation in project management
meetings, and coordination efforts with EIR consultants.
Staff is requesting an additional authorization of$56,904 for this upcoming work. As
with the work described above, CDM has agreed to complete the work at their cost, with
no profit. The combined fee for the additional completed and future work described
above is $293,022.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The total additional fee of$293,022 is 10% of CDM's existing total budget of$2,929,178
for Phases 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan. Please refer to the attached Professional
Services Agreement Status Report.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item).
There are sufficient unexpended funds in the combined Strategic Plan project budgets
for phases 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan (Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge,
Job No. J-40-1; Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedules, Job No.
J-40-2; and Treatment, Disposal & Reuse Plan, Job No. J-40-3) to cover the additional
fees. See attached Budget Information Table.
Page 2
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
WORK COMPLETED:
The fallowing represents the additional work completed thus far:
Technical Memos - In the January 1998 addendum, staff requested that technical
memos be prepared documenting the underlying engineering assumptions of the
Strategic Plan. They were prepared and reviewed by Engineering, 0 & M, Finance,
GSA and Technical Services. To better communicate and serve our internal
stakeholders, a collaborative process formed between the departments. The group,
known as the Technical Advisory Group (TAG), generated significant comments and
information during the review process beyond what was projected when the addendum
was issued. The large volume of comments reflected the fad that the technical memo
effort was underestimated initially. To address these comments, CDM performed
additional work, increasing the overall length of the technical memos from the
contracted 70 pages (seven memos 10 pages each) to over 360 pages (9 memos
averaging 42 pages in length). The technical memos were finalized during April and
May 1998. The review and comment process was necessary to ensure documentation
that resulted in the best information available for the Strategic Plan. The information will
serve in prioritizing construction of future capital projects. It will also be useful in making
future technical and operational decisions, particularly in light of the agency's
reinvention efforts.
Planning Issues - In June 1998, after completion of the technical memos, a number of
important assumptions changed. The changes required a level of engineering effort
beyond the scope of work. The additional work included:
• Support for Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS)—The initial
engineering work on the treatment facilities (Volume 4)was based upon the GWRS
secondary effluent quality requirements provided in a March 1998 memorandum
from Orange County Water District (OCWD). To meet the GWRS requirements,
CDM determined that a $40 million secondary treatment expansion was necessary.
In June 1998, District Staff, OCWD, CDM, and the GWRS consultants (Black and
Veatch and Carollo Engineers) developed an alternate plan to reduce the amount of
secondary facilities supporting GWRS. It was decided that the District's existing
secondary facilities could be operated at a higher flow rate, increasing the effluent
solids content. To compensate for the higher solids content, the GWRS would
include $5 million in additional microfilters. Although this decision required CDM to
revise engineering work that they had already completed, the revised plan reduces
future secondary treatment construction by approximately $40 million.
Page 3
• Urban Design Element - The Strategic Plan includes a landscaping improvement '
plan to visually screen the area along Pacific Coast Highway at the south boundary
of Plant No. 2. CDM is required to coordinate the design with the City of Huntington
Beach (City) and the California Department of Fish and Game (DF& G). Consensus
between these agencies has been difficult, requiring more meetings and revisions to
the plans than originally anticipated. In July 1998, Staff directed CDM to modify
plans previously agreed upon by the City and incorporate changes recommended by
DF&G. The work was necessary to move forward with the project and maintain a
good relationship with the agencies involved.
50/50 Discharge Criteria -The original scope addressed two discharge scenarios,
the NPDES permit limits, and full secondary treatment. In July 1998, in preparation
for the August Board workshop, CDM analyzed the impact of GWRS on the District's
current policy of discharging a blended effluent consisting of 50 percent primary and
50 percent secondary effluents (50/50 policy). Although this analysis was not
included in the original scope, it was required to demonstrate the major differences
in cost between the District's 50/50 policy with and without GWRS.
Increased Staff and Board Support— Due to the highly collaborative nature of this
project, an increased level of technical and management analysis, decision-making, and
internal and external communication was required beyond what was originally
estimated. The meetings were necessary to provide the required communication with
the various stakeholders (Board, Public, and Management). The following additional
meetings were required beyond the original scope:
-Thirty biweekly management meetings (Technical Advisory Group and
Management Advisory Group)
-One Board Workshop
-One RAC Meeting
-Three Ad Hoc Committee Meetings
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL WORK:
The following represents proposed upcoming work:
Name Chanae - On July 1, 1998, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
(CSDOC) became the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). In addition, the
individual Districts were renamed as Revenue Areas as part of consolidation. Based on
these changes, all Strategic Plan volumes will need to be revised. Over 700 pages of
text and 200 figures and tables are affected by the name change, as well as associated
grammar (singular versus plural). Since the document will not be adopted until July
1999 (one year after consolidation), a name change is being recommended.
Interim Submittal for Capital Improvement Prooram (CIP)—The new facilities identified
in the Strategic Plan will need to be combined with the District's existing five year capital
Page 4
program and future rehabilitation and replacement projects. An additional interim
submittal of the CIP will be required to assure that project phasing and budgeting has
been reviewed and analyzed by District Staff, and that the District's input is included in
the final CIP. An interim submittal will require CDM to conduct additional meetings with
Staff and make revisions to the draft CIP prior to finalizing.
Ongoing Management and Enaineen a Support -Staff informed the Ad Hoc and
Steering Committees at the July 29 meeting that additional strategic planning costs
would be incurred for future work due to extension of the project schedule. The
schedule was extended to allow time to receive direction from the Board on the
designated preferred alternative for the Strategic Plan, prior to moving forward with the
CIP and the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This resulted in a Board
Workshop being held on August 22, with recommendations presented to the full Board
of Directors at the September 23id meeting. The additional time required to receive
Board direction on the preferred alternative has extended CDM's efforts beyond the
scheduled completion by the end of July. While a large part of the Strategic Plan has
been completed and reviewed by the District, there is significant effort remaining,
requiring continued consultant support. The support services include a number of
ongoing responsibilities, including:
- Eight Project Management Meetings
- One Ad Hoc Committee Meetings
- One Board Workshops
- Four coordination meetings with the EIR consultants
PROPOSED ADDENDUM NO. 4 COST SUMMARY:
Work Completed
Technical Memos $103,867
Revised Planning Issues $ 59,808
Schedule Delays/ Management Support 7$ 2,443
Subtotal $236,118
Upcoming Work
Documentation; Consolidation and Name Change $ 23,304
Interim Submittals for CIP $ 22,600
Ongoing Management and Engineering Support $ 11,000
Subtotal $ 56,904
Addendum No. 4 Total $293,022
ALTERNATIVES
Do not approve addendum. Should the PSA not be amended, CDM would not be
compensated for extra work already completed. In addition, revisions reflecting the
District's name change and refinement of the CIP would not be done.
Page 5
CEOA FINDINGS
None Required.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Professional Services Agreement Status Report
2. Budget Information Table, Phase 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan
3. Proposal letter from CDM dated October 12, 1998
JDH:jam
G:WglobaMgenda Draft Re"ft\PDCUJ AR2d=
Page 6
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Job/Contract No. J-40-3
Phase 2 Strategic Plan
Total Project Budget: $ 1,462,000
Consultant: Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc.
Start Dale of Project: January 22, 1997
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated
Costs
1/22/97 Original PSA Phase 2 Strategic Plan—Treatment, Reuse and 673,461 673,461
Disposal Plan
1/5/98 1 Additional Energy Studies 15,049 688,510
Revised Permit Conditions, Additional Public
1/28/98 2 Involvement, and Assistance with Outstanding 397,239 1,085,749
Rate Structure Issues
Develop and file a Stormwater Management Plan
9/3/98 3 with California Regional Water Quality Control 24.969 1.110,718
Board
Proposed 4
Support ongoing and future activities for
completion of the Strategic Plan 293,022 1,403,740
HAwp.dtetenpUOBS 8 CONTRACTSXSTRAT PLANU40.3%ddendum%Addendum Status Repod.doc 10/20/98
Revised 05H4198
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
STRATEGIC PLAN (PHASES 1 & 2)
JOBS NO. J-40-1, J-40-2 & J-40-3
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROE3.222,20O2
TED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TITURE COMPLETE
BUDGET. BUDGET. INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHOTE TO DATE(%)
Consultant PSA' $ 2,671,000 $ 3,295200 S 3,295,200 $ 2,929,178 $ 293022 $ B,396 87%
Flow Monitoring
Services $ 359,800 $ 359.800 $ 359800 $ 9,800 100%
Staff$Overhead $ 380,000 $ 937,260 $ 937,250 $ 937,260 $ 937,250 $ 871.444 1 93%
Contingnecy and
Other $ - $ 210245 $ 210,245 $ 59645 $ 59545 $ 59645 100%
TOTAL $ 3.051,000 $ 4.802,495 $ - $ 4,802,495 S 4,285.873 $ 293,022 $ 4,578,895 $ 4,099,285 on
Ooee not include$239,930I.,Di.Vict 7 MepPing Plolaol.
h'.Nvp Lta`engVoboconbecbtftmtp1ny-403eaddendum 4 AR budget table
' Jim tl,
CDMCamp Dresser&McKee Inc.
oon•wmo 1925 Palomar Oaks Way,Suite 300
a^e^ `M Carlsbad,California 92008
o,`uf y'0" Te1:760438-M5 Fat:760436.7411 RECEIVED
m•ra� ' ENGINEE91NG
DEPARTMENT
October 12,1998
OCT 2 3 1998
COUNTY SANITATIC;J
Mr.David A.Ludwin DISTRICTS OF
Director of Engineering ORANGE COUNTY
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O.Box 8127
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Subject: Strategic Plan,Phase 2-Job J-40-3
Addendum 4:Revisions to the.Strategic Plan
Dear Mr.Ludwin:
Thank you so much for meeting with us today to review the changes in scope to the
strategic planning effort. As we discussed today,much has transpired since receiving
Addendum 2 on January 28, 1998. Changes in technical direction,levels of detail,and
schedule delays have resulted in a higher level of effort to complete the planning and
engineering analyses and documentation. Although the work has provided additional
benefits to the decision-making process,it has exceeded the level of effort envisioned by
both CDM and OCSD in January 1998.
As we are all aware,this project has been more of a"process"than a traditionally-defined
project. Although the process may have seemed somewhat arduous at times,there has
been a tremendous amount of valuable work performed. This work has resulted in the
development of dynamic tools and documentation that will provide significant benefit to
the District and the County of Orange for many years to come.
Through this collaborative process,the District's staff,management,Board and public
have gained significantly in the following areas:
• Dynamic Tools
- Collection System Model(STORM and Extran)
Wastewater Treatment Facilities Model
Facet Decision Model
H,S Model
• Detailed Documentation and Action Plans
Planning and Design Criteria
- Cost Criteria(capital and O&M)
- Stormwater Management Plan
- Water Conservation Program
- Interim Flow Management Plan
- Hydrogen Sulfide Study
Urban Design Plan
CDM Camp Dresser&McKee Inc.
Mr.David A.Ludwin
October 12, 1998
Page 2
• Foundation for Future Programs
- GWR System Implementation
- Cooperative Projects Program
- Adaptive Plan for Future Regulatory Changes
Because of the level of effort in gaining input and buy-in both internally(staff,
management and Board) and externally(public and regulatory community),these tools
and plans will be extremely useful as you proceed through the planning horizon.
Additional Work Required
Below,you will find a more detailed accounting of the changes in scope that have
occurred in the last 8 months. We hope this documentation helps to illuminate not only
the changes to the levels of effort,but the benefits gained by them. We have also
included a time line to illustrate the incremental nature of the changes in scope.
Planning Issues
• Support of GWR System
On June 1,1998,after completion of the technical memoranda documenting all of
the engineering baseline assumptions and parameters,a meeting was held with
the GWR System Team to review facility changes that would reduce the cost
impacts of GWR System support. At that meeting,significant baseline
assumptions were revised. These assumptions included use of trickling filter
effluent for GWR supply water,reduction in quality of secondary effluent
acceptable to GWR(increasing loading rates to clarifiers),and the pursuit of Phase
I only for GWR. Although these changes significantly impacted the strategic
planning efforts,the changes benefitted both OCSD and OCWD by reducing the
cost of supporting GWR System by$40 million.
• Innbvative Technol=
The original scope of work required CDM to consider space-saving technologies
to forestall possible site limitation problems at both plants. In addition,the scope
required CDM to specifically consider primary effluent filtration. However,
during the development of the technical memoranda,and in subsequent meetings
and discussions with OCSD staff regarding Volume 4, comments from OCSD
emphasized the need to consider further opportunities. Based on this input,
Sections 5,6,9 and 17 of Volume 4 were revised to include innovative technology
discussions for implementation of promising innovative technologies for
preliminary/primary,secondary and solids processes. This additional work
consolidated,evaluated and prioritized a variety of innovative process
technologies and provided support to OCSD's on-going monitoring of alternative
CDM Camp Dresser&McKee Inc.
Mr.David A. Ludwin
October 12, 1998
Page 3
processes. (It should be noted that CDM is not asking for additional
compensation for this expanded scope of work.)
• Urban Design I m nt
As part of the development of contract documents for landscape improvements to
the Plant 2 south boundary wall,CDM was required to coordinate with OCSD
and the City of Huntington Beach to ensure that any proposed improvements
were acceptable to the California Department of Fish and Game. In April 1998,
CDM and OCSD met with the City of Huntington Beach to begin the process.
Coordination with Fish and Game resulted in a meeting on July 15, 1998 which
also included the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Differences between these
agencies and the City required revisions by CDM to the original set of plans
recommended for the area and agreed to by the City. This issue is still
unresolved,and the CDM team has demobilized temporarily. Once completed,
however, this project will not only result in a pleasant visual break to travelers
along Pacific Coast Highway,but it will also strengthen OCSD's existing good
relationships with both the City of Huntington Beach and the California
Department of Fish and Game.
• Odor Control/Air Emissions
The original scope of work required CDM to conduct a straightforward
evaluation of previous studies conducted regarding odor control scrubbers and to
prepare a technical memorandum presenting recommendations to increase
scrubber efficiency. This initial scope was slowly expanded by OCSD staff until
"odor control"became"air emissions'which resulted in the preparation of
Technical Memorandum 4A-1 which was issued in May 1998. This
memorandum,consisting of over 30 pages,covers odor/VOC treatment
parameters,practices and operating philosophies;air emissions permitting
regulations driving odor control requirements;criteria for chemical odor
treatment and biofiltration,and air emissions impacts affecting power generation.
While this work provides clew benefits to OCSD in strategic planning,it has
moved far beyond the original intent of the scope of work. (It should be noted
that CDM is not asking for additional compensation for this expanded scope of
work.)
• Addition of 5050 Level of Treatment
In August of 1998,staff requested that CDM consider the District's current target
of achieving a blend of 50 percent primary and 50 percent secondary effluent,in
addition to the original NPDES permit limits and full secondary treatment
criteria. This work was requested to show the comparative impact of changing
from current philosophy to the new permit limits. Through this additional
CDMCamp Dresser&McKee Inc.
Mr. David A. Ludwin
October 12,1998
Page 4
analyses,the Board was able to make an educated decision regarding the move
from current philosophy to producing an effluent meeting permit requirements.
To quantify the increased level of effort,we provide the following summary:
Budget $170,139(1281 hours)
Actual $229,947(1976 hours)
Difference$59,808(695 hours)
Technical Memoranda
The original concept and intent of the development of technical memoranda was to
confirm thb fundamental assumptions and"building blocks"which had been developed
in 1997. These memoranda were to incorporate work that had been previously
completed. The understanding was that these memoranda would be short(t10 pages)
with minimum review of the contents.
After receipt of the Addendum 2,however,the scope and breadth of the Technical
Memoranda changed considerably. The Memoranda became a tool for greater staff
collaboration,input and review of the baseline decisions,an opportunity for staff to
reconsider assumptions that had been previously made,and a chance for more in-depth
documentation of background information and description of tools and methodology
used to reach the decisions made. This process afforded the District the additional
opportunity to take full advantage of the extertise and knowledge of the staff in
Operation&Maintenance,Technical Services and Engineering and Planning.
Although this greater level of participation and detailed analyses and documentation will
help make these tools more accepted and utilized,the effort to complete the documents
far exceeded the originally anticipated level.
To quantify the increased level of effort,we provide the following summary:
- Original 7 memos,10 pages each,5 reviewers,level of comments-1 week turn
around
- Actual 9 memos,average 47 pages each(excluding appendices),20-25 reviewers,
average 70 comments per memo,2 to 3 weeks to address
Budget $109568(879 hours)
Actual $213,435 (1888 hours)
Difference$103,867(1009 hours)
CDM Camp Dresser&McKee Inc.
Mr.David A. Ludwin
October 12,1998
Page
Schedule Delays/Increase in Management
As you know,the schedule for completion and the number of meetings required for
planning,education,and decision-making have been expanded as the process has
progressed. In reviewing the contractual requirements(original agreement plus
addenda)for meetings compared with the actual number of formal meetings(excluding
informal staff-level discussions),the additional effort has been substantial,but warranted
in bringing the necessary parties toward decision.
To quantify the increased level of effort,we provide the following summary:
Meetinp By Contract Actual (as of 10-10-98)
Bi-weekly(STRAP,TAG) 54 84
Board Workshops 8 9
RAC/PAC 16 17
Ad Hoc 9 12
Budget $454,379(3,504 hours)
Actual $526,822(3,959 hours)
Difference:$72,443(455 hours)
Additional Work Efforts Required
• Name Change
On July 1,1998,the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(CSDOC)
became the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD). In addition,the title of
each individual member District was changed from District to Revenue Area. All
Strategic Plan volumes need to be revised to reflect these recent changes. Over
700 pages of text and 200 figures and tables are affected as well as associated
grammar(singular versus plural).
• Additional Technical Review/Comments
With the exception of the Volume 3,the scope of work required the submittal of
only a draft 50%and a final submittal for each volume of the Strategic Plan.
However,it has become clear that staff require at least one other opportunity to
review the portions of key volumes which present Capital Improvement Program
(CEP)information. Single submittals of the draft CIPs for the collection system,
treatment facilities and disposal system will be prepared by CDM for review by
OCSD staff. CIP adjustments and phasing of expenditures to the collection
system,treatment plants and disposal system will be performed by OCSD staff in
=M Camp Dresser&McKee Inc.
Mr.David A.Ludwin
October 12,1998
Page 6
working sessions with CDM staff. The resultant comments will be provided to
CDM for incorporation into the final CIP. This process has already been
discussed with staff and has been accepted by them to finalize the CIP.
• Ongoing Management and Entneering Support
The current Strategic Plan effort was scheduled to be completed by the end of July
1998. While a large part of the work has been completed and reviewed by OCSD,
the continued participation of CDM to provide support to the Strategic Plan effort
through mid-1999 is seen by OCSD and CDM has beneficial. To provide this
support on an on-call basis,an upper limit not-to-exceed value for these services
has been established by OCSD. The extent,timing and level of effort of all
support efforts provided under this task will be defined by OCSD in advance.
CDM will endeavor to make available those staff requested by OCSD at the
locations and times proposed by OCSD. In this way,CDM's expertise in the
strategic planning process will continue to be available to OCSD.
Level of Effort
The level of effort that has been expended and will be needed to complete the work
outlined above is broken down in the attached Table 1. As you can see,the fee needed to
complete the work is$293,022. As we are all aware of budget constraints and the need to
minimize impacts to the District,we are offering that CDM be compensated on an"at
cost"basis for the work outlined herein.
Thank you for your consideration of this requested addendum. We are proud to be a
part of this important planning process and have enjoyed the team spirit that has been
fostered. We look forward to the successful completion of this useful,dynamic plan.
Very truly yours,
CAMP DRESSER&MdCiE INC.
Kellene M.Bum-Lucht,P.E.
Senior Vice President
KMBL:hs:
I:Wad\proprs M0,12 m prp
CC. Jim Herberg,OCSD
Paul Gustafson,CDM
CDMCamp Dresser&McKee Inc.
Mr.David A.Ludwin
October 12, 1998
Page 7
Table 1
Description of Tasks
Summary of Labor Hours and Fee
Description Estimated/ Estimated/
Actual Actual Cost
Labor
Hours
Planning Issues 695 $59,808
Technical Memoranda 1009 $103,867
Schedule Delays/Increase in 455 $72,443
Management
Name Change 244 $23.304
Additional Technical Review/Comments 236 $22,600
Ongoing Support 118 $11,000
Total 2757 $293,022
PDC COMMITTEE Ne„roeenyom Te /sa la.mx .
s/se
r AGENDA REPORT Item Num. IWMm Iw
nc98-46 (
Orange County Sanitation Disbi
FROM: David Lud , erector of Engineering
Originator: Dean Fisher, Engineer
SUBJECT: SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB
NO. P1-36, AND SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT
NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Carollo
Engineers for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and
Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P242, for an additional
amount of$62,993, increasing the total amount not to exceed $7,119,469.
SUMMARY
The construction of the Secondary Treatment Improvement Project at Plant No. 1 is the
final phase of a multi-project design and construction effort. The construction of this
final phase is now 99% complete. This project contains a significant amount of
automation and associated programming in order to control the process. An addendum
was issued to Carollo earlier in this project to add programming services to their PSA.
Implementing and testing this software while coordinating with the construction
schedule has proven to be more time consuming than first realized. Sequencing the
construction to replace equipment while keeping the plant in service requires that
equipment be placed on-line in phases. This results in a start-stop work schedule that
taxes resources. In addition, other change orders on the project have lengthened the
construction schedule when the original programming addendum was written. This has
caused an increase in the projected amount of overhead and labor costs from that
originally proposed. For these reasons, the programming effort requires additional
compensation in order to complete the project.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached PSA Status Report.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:A.3.b)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
See attached Budget Information Table.
nndcnVmlb WbgWM a LOMACT 1.WIR Addendum W etrc
R„.. &,� Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Project Summary
Job No. P1-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, consists of
expanding the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. The project provides ten
new secondary clarifiers, replacement of the existing aeration system, replacement of
the existing blowers, renovation of three existing dissolved air flotation thickeners, three
new dissolved air flotation thickeners and other improvements. These improvements will
increase the secondary treatment capacity from forty-six million gallons per day to
eighty million gallons per day. The contract also includes a new pump station for the
Orange County Water District for which the District will be reimbursed. Carollo
Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to
Margate Construction, Inc. on September 18, 1995.
The original PSA to Carollo Engineers to provide design services for this project was
executed on October 11, 1989. Since that time, seven addenda have modified or
added to this original PSA. Addendum No. 1 was ratified in November 1990 for
additional design services adding elements to the project. Addendum No. 2 was ratified
in June 1993 for air diffuser system studies and miscellaneous design changes.
Addendum No. 3 was ratified in April 1994 for additional costs relating to schedule
changes and miscellaneous additions. Addendum No. 4 was ratified in June 1995 to
add programming services and additional construction support. Addendum No. 5 was
ratified in November 1996 for services to perform an electrical coordination study.
Addendum No. 6 was ratified in January 1997 to provide additional training and
construction support services. Addendum No. 7 was ratified in March 1997 to add and
revise elements to the programming services. Addendum No. 8 is proposed to add
additional programming services in order to complete the necessary testing and training
on the completed programming in order to meet the Districts needs.
Please refer to the attached PSA Status Sheet.
Addendum No. 8 —Additional Programming Required
Addendum No. 4 originally added programming services to the Carollo scope of work,
which included programming the three automatic controllers and associated graphic
interfaces to automate the project and other services including testing and
documentation. This addendum was based on the information known at the time and
was based on computer systems used at the time, but has since proved to be
insufficient to complete all of the work required. This proposal did not take into account
several elements that have evolved during the completion of this project such as:
• The piecemeal nature of meeting the construction schedule. This schedule is far
more detailed than any used to estimate programming time and has been modified
numerous times during the course of construction. Keeping the plant in service
while replacing nearly all of the equipment results in a phased schedule where only
small pieces can be completed at a time. The results in a start-stop work schedule
as well as making provisions for a working system when all of the components may
not be completed.
%WdonbablM Wb,gUOB &COM ACTS 1. fi IRAddendum No.8.
R—. &1w Page 2
A
• The use of a relatively new graphical interface software package that has resulted in
additional efforts while the software manufacturer corrects problems discovered by
programmers.
The requirements of configuring the control system to control the specific equipment
used on the project, the details of which were unknown before the project bid and
submittal phase.
• Special requirements placed on the project staff when removing existing equipment
from one control system and place it on the new system, and configuring special
alarms and some custom programming to meet the Operations Staff needs.
• Reduced District staff resources in assisting with the coordination of testing and
startup. During the latter part of this project, several other projects are also in the
testing and startup phase, including the Primary Clarifier Rehabilitation Project(s),
the City Water Improvements Project(s) and the Main Street Pump Station
Improvements. This has led to some additional coordination efforts on the part of
the consultant.
To compensate for the above and allow for the continuation of programming, testing,
and startup, this proposed addendum provides an additional $67,460 to Direct Labor
and Overhead, while subtracting $4,467 from the Other Direct Costs, resulting in a net
addition to the PSA of$62,993. The Fixed Profit remains unchanged as this addendum
only compensates for the additional labor and overhead needed to complete the work.
This modifies the total not to exceed amount of the PSA to $7,119,469.
Please refer to the Proposal Letter for Carollo Engineers dated October 26, 1998.
Project Billing and Timeline
A portion of this addendum amount compensates for additional programming hours
billed to the project that are beyond the previously approved Addendum No. 4. A
potential for a PSA budget shortfall has been known and discussed between the District
and Carollo for the last 90 days. During that time negotiations and ongoing project work
hampered a quick resolution to this problem. District staff expected the consultant to be
able to complete the contract work within the budget and timeframe required.
As the startup progressed it was evident that more effort was being expended than
anyone projected, both in District staff time and programming effort. District staff had to
rely on the consultant for additional assistance on this project as staff was working on
several projects that required startup expertise. The District continued to negotiate with
Carollo, but did not direct the programmers to stop in order to keep the construction
contractor on schedule. Programming and testing the controls, unlike other design
consultant tasks, directly affects the contractor's schedule. The startup testing was
treated as a priority over the PSA programming time for bath the District staff and
Carollo as there was insufficient staffing to concentrate on both issues concurrently.
nxadanWmaln,GbMn9WM&WNMACiS%30WR Addendum No.Odc
aa:sed: WIM98 Page 3
Once the construction schedule was satisfied and there was a breaking point,
negotiations resumed resulting in this addendum request. The resulting billing amount
in excess of the original addendum is approximately $25,000. IV
Project Budget
The project budget is sufficient to cover to the additional costs of the proposed
addendum, however a reallocation between the budget tasks is required. The proposed
budget changes would reallocate $62,993 from the Staff and Support task into the
Design task in order to increase the authorized budget for the design Consultant. There
is no increase or change to the total project budget.
Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table.
ALTERNATIVES
None
ATTACHMENTS
1. Professional Services Agreement Status Report
2. Budget Information Table
3. Proposal letter from Carollo Engineers dated October 26, 1998
NMon`JM\Mp4p WOW WO ARMS WAJGeMum No Bme
N' W, Page 4
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Job No. P1-36 and P2-42
Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 and
Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2
Total Project Budget: $40,800,000.00
Consultant: Carollo Engineers
Start Date of Project: October 11, 1989
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated
Costs
10-11-89 Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 $4,997,841 $4,997,841
Original PSA and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2
11-14-90 Modifications to design, Design of A.S. lab at Plant $180,232 $5,178,073
1 No. 1 DAFs, 36-inch Drain at Plant 1, 84-inch
Bypass at Plant No. 2.
6-9-93 2 Air Diffuser Study, Miscellaneous Changes. $303 680 $5,481,753
4-26-95 Replacement pumps at Headworks C, Headworks $407,397 $5,889,150
B equipment hatch, Prequalification of pumps,
3 Relocation of Sidestream Pump Station,
Flowmeter, Observation Deck, Aeration System
modifications.
6-26-95 4 Additional Construction Services and PLC/MMI $750,215 $6,639,365
Programming.
11-12-96 5 Elect. Coordination Study $17,256 $6 656 621
1-22-97 6 Additional Construction Services and O&M $374,909 $7,031,530
Manuals.
3-18-97 7 Changes to Control System and Programming for $24,946 $7,056,476
Blower/Aeration Control and Sludge Valve Control.
Proposed 8 Additional Programming Services for Testing and $62,993 $7,119,469
Coordination.
Hflwp dta�ng�OBS 8 CONTRACT51P1-3 2VWd.8 PSA SIatn.dw 1027/98
Revised 0511 /98
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1
Job No. Pt-36-2
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNS THIS ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION PROPOSED TOTAL AUTHORIZA71ON EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGETDAT DATE REQUEST DATE DATE(%)
Design' S 1,406065 $ 1,406,055 $ 62.993 S 1,469,056 $ 1.406.065 $ 62,993 $ 1,469.0541 S 1,302,300 89%
Construction S 35,835,690 S 35,635SW S 35,835,690 S 35,499,357 S 35,199.357 S 35,297.330 99%
Staff and Support S 3,356,245 1 S 3,556,245 1$ 62,993 $ 3,495.252 $ 3,558245 S 62,993 $ 3,495,252 S 1,981,302 57%
TOTAL $ 40,600,000 $ 40,800,000 3 - f 40,800000 S 40,463,fi6] 3 - 3 40,453,667 S 36,560,932 95%
"Design"represents the portion of the Design Consultant PSA associated with the Pl-36-2 project.
H:1 PAWw scmu SI91.36wMmdum 6.aT
R.."08125/98
c ENC.'lJFc?(?�G
��LL�C" DEYRT7vVT rne,.l,r.dr,.. .n:,e
V <� a nG r n e e r s OCT ? 7 1999 ""' „;';°";"°"""""
b,w ry
COUNTY SANMATICA
DISTRICTS OF
ORAN3'c COJw-f
October 27, 1998
3340A2A
Orange County Sanitation District
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Attention: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Subject: Secondary Treatment expansion at Plant No. 1
Job No. P7-36-2
Programming and Construction Services Budget
Dear Mr. Ludwin:
For more than three years, Carollo has been providing construction services and PLC/HMI
programming services for the Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 1. In that time,
we have completed a major percentage of the work in our scope. Construction is now
essentially complete, and the PLC/HMIs at the DAF Complex (CPSCP4) and the RAS
Pump Station (CP-RW) have been installed and tested, and are currently operating the
equipment in a fully automatic mode. The programming and startup for these two
PLC/HMI's are essentially complete. The programs for the aeration system PLC/HMI at the
Blower Building (CP-BB) are currently installed, and have been partially tested. They are
capable of operating most of the equipment in a manual operating mode. Over the next
several weeks, we expect to test and place into service the automatic controls for the
aeration system, which will complete our programming effort.
We have prepared this letter to advise the Districts of our current budget status. As of
September 30, 1998,we estimate there are sufficient funds remaining in our budget
allocation to provide approximately 260 labor hours of work at our current labor rates. We
estimate that a total of 891 labor hours are necessary to complete the work in our
programming and construction services scope.
This 631 labor hour budget shortfall is primarily the result of add'Rional effort spent on
programming services during startup. This shortfall has occurred for a variety of reasons,
which we consider to be beyond our control, or could not have been foreseen at the time
our estimate for performing this work was prepared.The reasons are as follows:
1. The project has extended well beyond the scheduled completion date. Carollo
prepared the programming and construction services budgets, based on a thirty
month construction schedule. This project has extended well beyond the scheduled
completion date, and it appears as though the work will not be complete until
S:\33e0AkA\LETTERNUVJ ,Pd
3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92704 • (714) 540-4300 • TAX (714) 540.4349
b
Mr. David Ludwin
Orange County Sanitation District
October 27, 1998
Page No. 2
December 1998. We have been attending coordination meetings, and dealing with
programming and startup issues for several months longer than projected in our
estimate.
2. Resolving problems during startup has, in many cases, been a process of
elimination, where the mechanical components, electrical wiring, and PLC/HMI
controls all have to be checked against each other until the problems can be
identified and corrected.The level of effort required in coordinating startup of
equipment and program testing between Carollo, Contractor, and the Districts has
been significantly greater than was included in our estimate.
3. There have been a number of other Districts' projects going through startup at the
same time as this project. Districts inspection staff have been called away on several
occasions, sometimes for several days. In general, we have assigned our staff to
other projects during these periods, but starting and stopping of the program testing
on this project has resulted in delays and reduced efficiency.
4. During startup, Operations staff requested that a number of common alarms be
added to the programming, and that several process data values be transmitted to
the Control Center from the remote PLC's. This should not be a major effort, but
communication between the Remote PLC's and the Control Center was not part of
oursoope.
5. The level of effort necessary to train the Operations Department in the use of the
PLC/HMI controls has been significantly greater than projected.This training is
currently approximately 60 percent complete, but the training for CP-BB and the
aeration system controls remains to be completed.
At our current average labor and overhead rate of$106.91, we estimate the additional
budget necessary to complete the additional 631 labor hours of programming startup and
construction services total$67,460.
SIUX 0A2AUErrEMluEn5006.wp0
3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92704 • (714) 540-4300 . FM (714) 540-4349
Mr. David Ludwin
Orange County Sanitation District
October 27, 1998
Page No. 3
Through September 30, 1998; Carollo's labor, fixed fee, and other direct cost funds
remaining for Pt-36-2 are as follows:
Funds Remaining
Labor and Overhead $18,445.07
Fee $5,373.02
Other Direct Costs $19,967.07
(all Secondary Treatment/Electrification Projects)
Total $43,785.16
The$19,967.07 Other Direct Costs (OCD)funds remaining are more than is necessary to
complete the project. We estimate that expenses for O&M Manual reproduction, Record
Drawing reproduction, subconsultant expenses, and travel through the completion of the
project will be approximately$15,500. We request that the excess$4,467 CDC funds be
reallocated to help cover some of the additional labor and overhead expenses described
above.
In summary, the cost revisions proposed in this letter are as follows:
Added Direct labor and Indirect Costs $67,460
Fixed Profit $0
Other Direct Costs ($4,467)
Total Request $62,993
s:{33AOATA\LEFTErnwtlxio05.wp0
3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92704 • 1714) 540-4300 • FAX (714) 540-4349
W
Mr. David Ludwin
Orange County Sanitation District
October 27, 1998
Page No. 4
Carollo has provided on-call support for this project for more than three years. We would
like to assist the Districts Staff in completing this project, but cannot do so with the funds
currently allocated. We request that our allocation for this project be increased by$62,993
to cover additional costs resulting from the extended duration of the project, and additional
work.Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Very truly yours,
CARDILLO ENGINEERS, P.C.
Mark S. Ludlow
Project Manager
f am
P ' cipa
MSL:JD:pmb
cc: Tod Haynes (OCSD- Plant 1 Construction)
Dean Fisher (OCSD-Plant 1 Construction)
Mary Lee (Carollo-SAO)
SA, 07v!A\LMERIWOwA105.wpC
3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92704 (714) 540.4300 FAX (714) 5404349
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS meeting Me Tonsm.
wreroe
AGENDA REPORT Iem Numbe Ih%rvum6a
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
OCTOBER 1998
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1998.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the Districts
professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's
third-party custodian bank for the investment program.
The Districts Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly
Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating
Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with
the requirements of the Dislric's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio
contains no reverse repurchase agreements.
Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as
estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused
by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
\Y. W,WlM g ftVIPcnnMAHRTAHRWWwTu.RRI d¢
R«..d IWIM Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and
long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted
investment portfolio transactions for the month of October 1998 is attached. The
attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting
enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market
values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon
Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions
that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected.
The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted
Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient
funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements
for the next six months.
The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar
chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Aocounts October 31, 1998 Yield I%)
Stale of Calif LAW 9 12,491,874 5.6
Union Bank Checking Amount 481,303 4.6
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 2.083.000 4.8
PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 18.247.061 5.0
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 278,305.267 4.1
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 6,708 5.5
Debt Service Reserves®Trustees 32,635,323 6.2
Petty Cash 4,400
TOTAL $344,254.936
ALTERNATIVES/
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Reports
GGS:SK:lc
jv,m a+we e.ol v n. AHWAr RsewaT. ,Xa: Page 2
R. 'WW
c �
Prepared by Finance, 11/9/98, 4:06 PM
Monthly Treasurer's Report
District Fund Balances
$400,000,000
i
I
$300,000,000 H
$200,000,000 j
$100,000,000 —
i
i $0
May, 98 Jun, 98 Jul, 98 Aug, 98 Sep, 98 Oct, 98
OPIMCO-Long-term OPIMCO-Shod-tens
®Debt Service Reserves OLAIF
{ 13 Bank Accts O Petty Cash
0 Dist 11 GO Bond Fund
G:\excel.dta\fin\2220Ngegg!\Finance\monthly treasurers report
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
1WESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 October 1998)
Liquid Operating Monies (603)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
$18,247,087
MEW $18,247,061
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $18240,375
Mellon $18:240,350
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.15
Of Index: 0.20
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $27,669(0.15%)
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 82%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return(%):
I Month: 0.45
3 Months: 1.47
12 Months: 5.74
Year-to-Date: 4.75
Index Total Rate of Return(°/n):
1 Month: 0.40
MONTHLY REPORT
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 October 1998)
Long Term Operating Monies(203)
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
p�,CO 278,768,0221
Mellon 278,305,267
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $275,151,960
Mellon $274,863,778
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.41
Of Index: 2.31
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $6,822,739
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (%)
1 Month: 0.12
3 Months: 3.54
12 Months: 8.68
Year-to-Date: 7.57
Index Total Rate of Return: (%)
1 Month: 0.32
A
OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-OCT-1998 Halloo
4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ "'----- ----------------- ---------------- -------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,750,918.22 2,750,918.22 14.91% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 8,832,190.67 8,832,190.67 47.87% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 3,156,158.22 3,156,158.22 17.111 0.00 0.00 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 175,817.23 175,817.23 0.95% 0.00 7,970.51 4.53
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL CASH S CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,915,O04.34 14,915,084.34 80.84% 0.00 7,970.51 0.05
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,325,265.63 3,331,977.00 18.06% 6,711.37 210,375.00 6.31
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,325,265.63 3,331,977.00 18.061 6,711.37 210,375.00 6.31
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
.- PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 204,067.80 204,067.80 1.11% 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 204,067.60 204,067.80 1.11% 0.00 0.00 0.00
-----------a----- ------------------ -------- ----------------- -e------------- -----
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 18,444,417.77 18,451,129.14 100.00% 6,711.37 218,345.51 1.18
Page 1
OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-OCT-1998 HB1100
4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH -11,336,166.78 -11,336,166.78 -4.01% 0.00 0.00 0.00
RECEIVABLES 4,842,123.06 4,842,123.06 1.71% 0.00 0.00 0.00
PAYABLES -31,121,707.32 -31,121,707.32 -11.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00
MUTUAL FUNDS 12,572,872.65 12,572,872.65 4.45% 0.00 569,979.74 4.53
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS -25,042,978.39 -25,042,878.39 -8.85% 0.00 569,979.74 -2.28
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 146,194,606.19 149,744,897.27 52.94% 3,550,291.08 9,369,437.73 6.26
U.S. AGENCIES 14,518,624.75 15,100,270.00 5.34% 581,645.25 933,550.00 6.18
GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 4,545,000.00 4,542,865.00 1.61% -2,115.00 292,500.00 6.44
GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 6,494,194.13 6,447,839.52 2.28% -46,354.61 441,109.91 6.84
FHLMC POOLS 25,095,210.33 24,992,648.03 8.84% -102,562.30 1,676,255.27 6.71
FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,459,238.99 7,569,232.34 2.68% 109,993.35 469,850.20 6.21
FNMA POOLS 2,283,483.66 2,289,157.31 0.811 5,673.65 139,277.71 6.08
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 290,568.38 291,672.07 0.10% 1,104.49 18,015.24 6.18
OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 4,736,455.25 4,659,487.85 1.65% -76,967.40 262,620.43 5.64
BANKING 6 FINANCE 70,886,239.80 70,659,225.51 24.98% -229,014.29 4,213,281.16 5.96
INDUSTRIAL 9,903,780.00 9,405,180.00 3.33% -498,600.00 032,500.00 8.85
UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,645,650.00 2.70% 148,395.00 450,000.00 5.89
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 299,906,656.48 303,348,145.70 107.25% 3,441,409.22 19,098,397.65 6.30
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,542,003.17 4,542,003.17 1.61% 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,542,003.17 4,542,003.17 1.61% 0.00 0.00 0.00
.................. .................. ........ ................. ................ -------
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 279,405,781.26 282,847,270.48 100.00% 3,441,489.22 19,668,377.39 6.95
Page 1
YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 1
OCSF07511102 1998/10/31 RUN DATE : 11/05/98
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 24.59.53
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
CASH B CASH EQUIVALENTS
175,827.23 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGM .000 4.694 AAA 100.000 175,817.23 1.17
996085247 175,827.23 .96
1,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MG CORP DISC 4.808 .000 P-1 99.205 1,686,485.00 11.30
313397T68 MAT 12/18/1998 11686,485.00 9.24
3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MG CORP DISC 5.017 .000 P-1 99.667 3,687,666.67 24.72
313397Q53 MAT 11/23/1998 3,687,666.67 20.21
200,000.00 OU PONT BE NEMOUR DISC 5.076 .000 P-1 99.481 198,961.% 1.33
26354BLR1 11/25/1998 198,961.94 1.09
800,000.00 FORD MR CA CO DISC 5.287 .000 P-1 98.282 766,259.78 5.27
34539UMS 01/27/1999 786,259.78 4.31
2,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN RIG CORP DISC 5.354 .000 P-1 96.708 2,665,119.00 17.86
313397577 MAT IV21/1998 2,663,119.00 14.61
900,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN RIG CORP DISC 5.448 .000 P-1 99.II5 792,920.00 5.31
313397N49 MAT 11/06/1998 792,920.00 4.35
900,DOO.00 IBM DISC 5.494 .000 P-1 98.113 883,021.50 5.92
449228ND6 01/13/1999 883,021.50 4.84
3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN DISC 5.495 .000 P-1 98.630 3,156,158.22 21.16
313589N41 MAT 11/06/1998 3,156,158.22 17.30
900,000.00 GMAC DISC 5.608 .000 P-1 98.075 982,675.00 5.91
37042ELJ8 11/18/1998 802,675.00 4.84
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.OL7 .105 14,91510".34 100.00
14,915,084.34 81.75
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
3,300,D00.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.585 6.314 AAA 100.969 3,325,265.63 100.00
912827K72 06.375% 05/15/1999 DO OS/15/96 3,331,977.00 18.26
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 2
OCSF07511102 1990/10/31 RUN OATS 11/O3/96
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 14.59.53
PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOO( YIELD RATING PRICE NARXET VALUE X TOTAL
-""' """""""""'----""" """' -"-"' ""-"" -------- """'""" ------""
________ _______ _________________ _________
TOTAL FINED INCOME SECURITIES S.SBS 6.314 3,325,265.63 1D0.00
3,331,9T1.00 18.26
TOTAL 5.040 .356 18,240,349.97 100.00
18,247,061.34 100.00
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
OCSF07522202 1998/10/31 RUN DATE : 11/05/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING MAN TIME : 14.59.53
PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS
12,572,872.65 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH FONT .000 4.694 AAA 100.000 12,572,972.65 100.00
996085247 12,372,872.65 3.98
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 4.6% 12,572,872.65 1DO.00
12,572,872.65 3.98
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR MY CORP GLOBAL NT .000 6.434 A2 90.079 1,992,800.00 .59
066365DN4 FLTG RT 05/12/2003 OD 05/11/96 1,BOI,SBD.00 .57
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN .000 5.846 A2 99.328 3,498,615.00 1.14
17120QESO FLTG RT O6/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 3,476,460.00 1.10
456,845.54 FNMA POOL B0065581 .000 6.0" AAA 100.969 462,143.29 .15
31362H2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/D1/88 463,291.55 .15
2,000,D00.00 FORD MR CA CO TERM ENHANCED .000 5.803 Al 99.734 1,998,613.60 .65
M5397SM FLTG RT 08/27/2D06 DO 08/27/98 119941680.00 .63
4,000,000.00 FORD HTR CA HTN TRANCHE AIR 96 .000 5.480 Al 99.997 3,970,480.00 1.31
345402DZ1 FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 31999,880.00 1.27
7,1DO,000.00 FORD MOTOR CA MTN TR 8 00177 .000 4.373 Al 99.703 6,999,749.00 2.33
345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 OD 03/30/94 7,078,913.00 2.24
3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS .DDO 5.894 A2 98.189 3,918,70.50 1.27
370425QV5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 OD 08/17/98 3,878,465.50 1.23
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT .000 6.185 A3 100.037 21999,310.00 .98
423328AZ6 FLTG RT 04/27/2999 DO 04/27/% 3,001,110.00 .95
4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL HTN .000 5.923 A3 99.734 41000,000.0% 1.31
42333HJN3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 DO 04/07/98 3,989,360.00 1.26
4,000,000.09 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN .000 6.D18 AZ 98.822 4,000,000.00 1.30
44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 3,952,880.00 1.25
1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR A00570 .000 5.792 A2 99.161 999,188.90 .32
44181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/01/2001 OD 09/04/96 991,610.00 .31
YLOAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 4
OCSF07522202 1998/10/31 RUN DATE 11/05/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 14.59.53
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COSY/ I TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ _-_ -------- -________-
7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN NITTER SR NOTES .000 5.690 Al 99.765 71003,710.00 2.30
61745ELT6 FLTG RT OU23/2000 GO 02/23/98 6,983,550.00 2.21
4,736,455.25 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSM 98-2 Al .000 5.636 AAA 98.375 4,736,455.25 2.53
78442GBA3 KID RT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 4,659,487.85 1.47
7,141,40.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX MT 3.699 3.627 AAA 99.937 7,118,274.19 2.35
9228273AS 3.625X 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 7,236,%4.89 2.26
30,312,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX IR 3.731 3.432 AAA 98.344 10,033,710.47 3.34
9128272M3 3.375X O1/15/2007 GD DI/15/97 10,142,118.38 3.21
8,540,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 4.179 5.921 AAA 105.562 9,034,223.67 2.95
9120272G6 06.25DX O1/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 8,972,770.00 2.84
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.234 8.662 AAA 128.437 6,233,593.75 2.11
912810DES 11.1252 09/15/2003 DO 07/05/03 61421,850.00 2.03
27,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.366 6.897 AAA 108.750 29,464,908.90 9.82
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 29,797,500.00 9.43
13,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.436 6.453 AAA 116.219 14,559,266.30 4.98
912827586 07.500% OV1512005 DO OVIS195 15,108,470.00 4.78
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.553 5.876 AAA 106.359 2,566,119.73 .87
912827WS 06.2507. 08/31/2002 OD 09/02/97 2,658,975.00 .84
21,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.569 6.049 AAA 105.389 22,010,625.00 7.46
912827I54 06.375X 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 22,658,635.00 7.17
5,2DD,000.00 U S TREASURY B01D1S 5.617 8.941 AAA 132.812 6,698,250.00 2.27
912010DG0 11.875% 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/83 6,906,224.00 2.29
1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR IRS 5.650 6.317 AA3 102.904 1,543,215.00 .50
046003NY8 6.500X 07/15/2002 OD 07/11/97 1,543,560.00 .49
1,000,000.00 NELLER FINANCIAL INC IRS 5.760 5.775 A3 99.564 999,730.00, .32
42333WJ0 5.7502 09/25/2001 OD 09/25/98 995,640.00 .32
25,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.783 6.081 AAA 106.891 25,746,998.49 8.80
9128272WI 06.5007. 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 26,722,750.00 8.46
3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.183 AAA 107.141 3,613,203.13 1.23
9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 GO 04/30/97 3,749,935.00 1.19
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5
OMF07522202 1998/10/31 RUN DATE 11/05/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 14.59.53
PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT RUAL1'TY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE Y. TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ _---------
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 5.915 AAA 205.636 5,086,402.25 1.74
9128272LS 06.250X OV28/2002 00 OV28197 5,282,800.00 1.67
6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MTH 5.882 5.810 AA1 100.487 5,996,400.00 1.99
63658JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 6,041,220.00 1.91
1,224,772.15 FNLMC MULTICL MG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.963 100.625 1,213,063.87 .40
3133T0205 5.900% 06/15/2017 1,222,364.48 .39
2,051,736.68 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 5.957 5.878 AAA 100.376 2,047,486.95 .67
161614AE2 5.900E 11/15/2001 GO 11YI5195 2,059,451.21 .65
2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.243 AA3 102.119 2,526,725.00 .84
59018SKP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 OD 10/03/97 2,552,975.00 .81
7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.886 AAA 101.942 71497,255.00 2.52
079867AK5 6.000X 06/15/2002 DD 06/15/98 71645,650.00 2.42
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO MR FNMA 6.025 6.148 AAA 100.188 2,017,343.75 .66
999ACV232 6.1607. 11/n/Z028 2,003,750.00 .63
1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 6.032 6.849 A2 104.027 1,263,862.50 .42
370425RF0 7.125X 05/01/2001 DO OS/01/97 1,300,337.50 .41
2,000,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP NTN 6.046 6.480 A2 103.390 11028,520.00 .34
37042WMI 6.700% 04/30/2001 DO 04/25/96 1,033,900.00 .33
6,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 6.075 6.075 AAA 96.766 6,191,328.13 2.03
02R060613 6.000% 01/15/2029 6,172,875.00 1.95
903,708.28 FNMA POOL @0313371 6.096 6.088 AAA 100.969 910,203.68 .30
31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 00 01/01/97 912,465.21 .29
29,379.89 FKMA POOL 00339016 6.104 6.0% AAA 100.969 29,591.06 .00
31375M506 6.153X 11/01/203S OD 03/01/96 291664.58 .01
875,254.75 FNHA POOL *0313600 6.144 6.101 AAA 100.969 881,545.63. .29
31374GKM8 6.143X 05/01/2036 00 06/01/97 883,M.97 .28
290,568.39 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.177 AAA 100.380 290,568.36 .09
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 OB 03/15/96 291,672.87 .09
2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 6.225 6.194 A2 100.100 1,997,730.00 .65
073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 2,002,000.00 .63
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6
OCSF07522202 1998/10/31 RUN DATE 11/OS/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 14.59.53
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL
2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTH TR 00252 6.232 6.456 BMI 99.126 2,509,175.00 .81
SZS17PLMI 6.400% 08/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 2,478,150.00 .78
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO MR QNMA SF MTG 6.279 6.439 AAA 100.953 4,545,000.00 1.49
OIN06261S 6.5007. 01/15/2029 4,542,885.00 1."
4,5G0,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTH 6.291 5.972 AAA 104.312 4,488,705.00 2.54
31364CKV5 6.230X 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 4,6%,040.00 1.49
4,240,648.91 FMLMC MULTICLASS UP E3 A 6.316 6.303 AM IDO.332 4,245,287.12 1.40
3133TCE95 4.324% 08/15/2032 4,254,727.86 1.35
5.000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MLOSS NTH 400196 6.364 6.570 DMI 101.218 5,039,450.00 1.66
5n17PJD4 6.6507. 11/08/2000 OD 11/08/96 5,0601900.00 1.60
2,505,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC SR HTS 6.425 6.650 A2 101.506 1,317,619.35 .43
073902AN8 6.7507. 05/01/2001 DD 04/26/96 - 1,324,655.50 .42
2,000,000.00 FMLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 6.496 6.224 AM 104.607 2,000,888.00 .68
3133TDPV2 6.5002 09/25/2018 2,092,140.00 .66
8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTH 6.577 6.308 MA 105.032 8,012,576.00 2.76
31364CBD9 6.6252 D4/18/2001 OD 04/18/96 8,402,480.00 2.66
9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS HT 6.593 8.852 A2 304.502 9,9D3,780.00 3.10
718154BB2 9.2502 OVIS12000 9,405,180.00 2.98
15,839,360.94 FMLMC GROUP BGS-0476 6.628 6.923 MA 101.113 16,086,850.95 5.27
3128DDQSS 7.0007. G2/O1/2003 DO 02/01/98 16,015,653.03 5.07
3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM HTS 6.660 8.299 A2 103.931 3,227,070.00 1.02
37042RKQ4 8.6252 1/20/2000 DO 1/10/95 3,117,930.00 .99
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FMLMC GOLD SF 6.664 6.865 AM 102.968 2,817,031.25 .92
02R070600 7.D002 11/15/2028 2,804,120.00 .89
3,761,032.35 GNMA II POOL 8080088M 6.705 6.777 AM 101.453 3,843,304.94, 1.25
36225CC20 6.8757. 06/20/2027 OD 06/01/97 3,815,680.15 1.21
2,607,699.15 GNMA II POOL 00090023 6.869 6.935 MA 100.938 2,650,889.18 .86
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 OD 12/O1/96 2,632,159.37 .83
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BOWS 6.906 7.913 AM 167.437 4.029,030.31 1.37
912810DJ4 13.2502 03/15/2D14 00 05/15/84 4,185,925.00 1.32
YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE T
OCSF07522202 1998/30/31 RUN DATE 11/05/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RIM TIME 14.59.53
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION DOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ..........
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.060 6.061 299,906,656.48 100.G0
503,348,145.70 96.01
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL 4.054 6.069 312,479,529.13 100.00
313,921,010.35 100.00
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST "
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 00-OCT-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
912827D25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-OCT-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
912827SB6 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 07.500% 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-OCT-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
912827V66 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 05.750► 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 02-OCT-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
9128273A8 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PURCHASES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 DO PONT DE NEHOUR DISC 19-OCT-1998 -198,961.94 -198,961.94 99.490972
26354BLRI 11/25/1998 19-OCT-1998 198,961.94 198,961.94 99.480972
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 DU PONT DE NEHOUR DISC 19-OCT-1998 -198,961.94 -198,961.94 99.480972
26354BLRI 11/25/1998 19-OCT-1998 -198,961.94 0.00 99.480972
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 30-OCT-1998 -3,687,666.67 -3,687,666.67 99.666666
313397053 MAT 11/23/1998 30-OCT-1998 3,687,666.67 3,687,666.67 99.666666
B GOLD14AN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
Page 1
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
3,700,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 30-OCT-1998 -3,687,666.67 -3,687,666.67 99.666666
313397053 MAT 11/23/1998 30-OCT-1999 -3,687,666.67 0.00 99.666666
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,700,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 19-OCT-1998 -1,686,485.00 -1,686,485.00 99.205000
313397T68 MAT 12/18/1998 19-OCT-1998 1,686,485.00 1,686,485.00 99.205000
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
1,700,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 19-OCT-1998 -1,686,485.00 -1,686,485.00 99.205000
313397T68 MAT 12/18/1998 19-OCT-1998 -1,686,485.00 0.00 99.205000
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
685.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-OCT-1998 -685.88 -685.88 1.000000
996085247 01-OCT-1998 685.88 685.88 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
685.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-OCT-1998 -685.88 -685.88 1.000000
996085247 01-OCT-1998 -695.88 0.00 1.000000
FC 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,251,405.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-OCT-1998 -1,251,405.76 -1,251,405.76 1.000000
996085247 01-OCT-1999 1,251,405.76 1,251,405.76 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,251,405.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-OCT-1998 -1,251,405.76 -1,251,405.76 1.000000
996085247 01-OCT-1998 -1,251,405.76 0.00 1.000000
FC 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,186,133.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HUNT 05-OCT-1998 -5,106,133.33 -5,186,133.33 1.000000
996085247 05-OCT-1998 5,186,233.33 5,186,133.33 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 2
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,186,133.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-OCT-1998 -5,186,133.33 -5,186,133.33 1.000000
996085247 05-OCT-1998 -5,186,133.33 0.00 1.000000
FC 05-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
175,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-OCT-1998 -175,500.00 -175,500.00 1.000000
996085247 07-OCT-1998 175,500.00 175,500.00 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
175,500.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-OCT-1998 -175,500.00 -175,500.00 1.000000
996085247 07-OCT-1998 -175,500.00 0.00 1.000000
FC 07-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,637,770.21 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-OCT-1998 -3,637,770.21 -3,637,770.21 1.000000
996085247 15-OCT-1998 3,637,770.21 3,637,770.21 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,637,770.21 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-OCT-1998 -3,637,770.21 -3,637,770.21 1.000000
996085247 15-OCT-1998 -3,637,770.21 0.00 1.000000
PC 15-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,400,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-OCT-1998 -2,400,000.00 -2,400,000.00 1.000000
996085247 16-OCT-1999 2,400,000.00 2,400,000.00 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,400,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-OCT-1998 -2,400,000.00 -2,400,000.00 1.000000
996085247 16-OCT-1999 -2,400,000.00 0.00 1.000000
FC 16-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,870,203.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-OCT-1998 -2,870,203.44 -2,870,203.44 1.000000
996085247 20-OCT-1998 2,870,203.44 2,870,203.44 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 3
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,870,203.44 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-OCT-1998 -2,870,203.44 -2,870,203.44 1.000000
996085247 20-OCT-1998 -2,B70,203.44 0.00 1.000000
PC 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,900,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-OCT-1998 -2,900,000.00 -2,900,000.00 1.000000
996085247 23-OCT-1998 2,900,000.00 2,900,000.00 2.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,900,000.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 23-OCT-1990 -2,900,000.00 -2,900,000.00 1.000000
996005247 23-OCT-1998 -2,900,000.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 23-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
469,325.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NGHT 26-OCT-1999 -469,325.20 -469,325.20 1.000000
996085247 26-OCT-1998 469,325.20 469,325.20 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
469,325.20 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGRT 26-OCT-1998 -469,325.20 -469,325.20 1.000000
996085247 26-OCT-1998 -469,325.20 0.00 1.000000
PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
116,061.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-OCT-1990 -116,861.10 -116,861.10 1.000000
996085247 27-OCT-1998 116,861.10 116,861.10 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
116,061.10 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-OCT-1990 -116,861.10 -116,861.10 1.000000
996005247 27-OCT-1998 -116,861.10 0.00 1.000000
FC 27-OCT-199B 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
10,415,590.91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-OCT-1998 -10,415,598.91 -10,415,598.91 1.000000
996085247 28-OCT-1998 10,415,598.91 10,415,598.91 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 4
OCS0000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,415,598.91 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-OCT-1998 -10,415,598.91 -10,415,598.91 1.000000
996085247 28-OCT-1998 -10,415,598.91 0.00 1.000000
PC 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,142,525.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-OCT-1998 -12,142,525.50 -12,142,525.50 1.000000
996085247 30-OCT-1998 12,142,525.50 12,142,525.50 1.000000
B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,142,525.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-OCT-1998 -12,142,525.50 -12,142,525.50 1.000000
996085247 30-OCT-1998 -12,142,525.50 0.00 1.000000
PC 30-OCT-1998 0.00 '0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
193,998.65 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 15-OCT-1998 -193,998.65 -193,998.65 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT DD O6/26/1997 15-OCT-1998 193,998.65 193,998.65 1.000000
B 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
263,544.75 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 27-OCT-1998 -263,544.75 -263,544.75 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 27-OCT-1999 263,544.75 263,544.75 1.000000
B 27-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB GNMA SF MTG 01-SEP-1998 -8,721,132.77 -8,721,132.77 102.601562
O1N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -8,722,132.77 0.00 102.601562
PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 21-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG O1-SEP-1996 -4,527,070.29 -4,527,070.29 100.601562
01NO626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 4,527,070.29 4,527,070.29 100.601562
B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR GNMA SF MTG O1-SEP-1998 4,527,070.29 4,527,070.29 100.601562
_-- Page 5
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
01N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -4,527,070.29 -4,527,070.29 100.601562
BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 -4,599,843.75 -4,599,843.75 102.218750
O1N0626B3 6.500% 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 4,599,843.75 4,599,843.75 102.218750
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 4,599,843.75 4,599,843.75 102.218750
O1N0626B3 6,500% 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 -4,599,843.75 -4,599,843.75 102.218750
BC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1,000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 -4,599,843.75 -4,599,843.75 102.218750
O1N0626B3 6.5001 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 4,599,843.75 4,599,843.75 102.218750
B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 4,599,843.75 4,599,843.75 102.218750
O1N0626B3 6.500% 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 -4,599,843.75 -4,599,843.75 302.21B750
BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 -4,545,000.00 -4,545,000.00 101.000000
O1N062615 6.500% 01/15/2029 21-JAN-1999 4,545,000.00 4,545,000.00 101.000000
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 -4,709,921.88 -4,709,921.88 99.156250
02R0606A3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -4,709,921.88 0.00 99.156250
FC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 -4,709,921.08 -4,709,921.88 99.156250
02RO606A3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 4,709,921.68 4,709,921.88 99.156250
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 6
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1999 4,709,921.88 4,709,921.88 99.156250
02R0606A3 6.000% 10/25/2028 14-OCT-1998 -4,709,921.88 -4,709,921.88 99.156250
BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 06-OCT-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.906250
02RO606BI 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 4,745,546.89 4,745,546.88 99.906250
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.00OOD0000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 06-OCT-1998 4,745,546.88 4,745,546.86 99.906250
02R060691 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.906250
BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF O6-OCT-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.906250
02RO60681 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 4,745,546.88 4,745,546.88 99.906250
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF O6-OCT-1998 4,745,546.88 4,745,546.88 99.906250
02RO606BI 6.0001 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.906250
BC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 16-OCT-1998 -1,491,796.88 -1,491,796.88 99.453125
02R060613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 1,491,796.00 1,491,796.98 99.453125
B GREENWICH CAP MKTS, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 -4,699,531.25 -4,699,531.25 98.937500
02R060613 6.000% 01/15/2029 14-JAN-1999 4,699,531.25 4,699,531.25 99.937500
B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750
02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2029 14-OCT-1998 -2,804,140.63 0.00 101.968750
PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
- Paga 7
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750
02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -2,804,140.63 0.00 101.968750
FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 2,804,140.63 2,804,240.63 101.968750
02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 2,804,140.63 0.00 101.968750
FCC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 2,904,140.63 2,004,140.63 101.968750
02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750
BC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750
02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 2,804,140.63 2,804,140.63 101.968750
B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750
02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -2,804,140.63 0.00 101.968750
PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1998 0.00 O.DO 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 2,804,140.63 2,804,140.63 101.968750
02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750
BC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 2,804,140.63 2,804,140.63 101.968750
02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 2,804,140.63 0.00 101.968750
FCC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 07-OCT-1998 -2,817,031.25 -2,817,031.25 102.437500
02R0706BO 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500
B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 8
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 07-OCT-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500
02R0706BO 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -2,817,031.25 -2,817,031.25 102.437500
BC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 07-OCT-1998 -2,817,031.25 -2,817,031.25 102.437500
02R0706B0 7.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500
B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 22-SEP-1998 999,730.00 999,730.00 99.973000
42333HKJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 25-SEP-1998 -999,730.00 -999,730.00 99.973000
BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 11000000000
D.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 22-SEP-1998 999,730.00 999,730.00 99.973000
42333HKJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 25-SEP-1998 999,730.00 0.00 99.973000
FCC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 28-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 -6,404,325.00 -6,404,325.00 128.086500
912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 26-JAN-1999 6,404,325.00 6,404,325.00 128.086500
B HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 -247,894.02 -247,894.02 128.086500
912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 26-JAN-2999 0.00 0.00 128.086500
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
15,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-SEP-1998 -17,563,145.70 -17,563,145.70 107.877900
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 23-OCT-1998 -17,563,145.70 0.00 107.877900
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 23-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-OCT-1998 -13,414,318.50 -23,414,318.50 109.059500
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 29-OCT-199B 13,414,318.50 13,414,318.50 109.059500
B BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 9
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE NRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-OCT-1998 -418,634.51 -418,634.51 109.059500
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 29-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 109.059500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-OCT-1998 -13,832,953.01 -13,832,953.01 109.059500
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 29-OCT-1998 -13,832,953.01 0.00 109.059500
PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 29-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1998 -3,160,881.10 -3,160,881.10 108.995900
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 12-NOV-1998 3,160,881.10 3,160,881.30 108.995900
B BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1990 -106,976.90 -106,976.90 108.995900
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 OD 11/15/91 12-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 108.995900
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 -44,420,381.28 -44,420,381.28 101.637900
912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 20-OCT-1998 -44,420,381.28 0.00 101.637900
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 20-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 -44,274,250.00 -44,274,250.00 102.250000
912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 19-OCT-1998 44,274,250.00 44,274,250.00 102.250000
B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 -402,947.17 -402,947.17 102.250000
912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 102.250000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 -44,677,197.17 -44,677,197.17 102.250000
912827R20 06.875% O0/31/1999 DO O8/31/94 19-OCT-1998 -44,677,197.17 0.00 102.250000
Page 10
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1990 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-SEP-1998 -571,506.12 -571,506.12 113.280300
912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 09-OCT-1998 -571,506.12 0.00 113.180300
PC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 09-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
D.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-SEP-1998 -2,996,754.46 -2,996,754.46 113.996200
912827586 07.5001 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 16-OCT-1998 -2,996,754.46 0.00 113.996200
FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 -2,657,095.41 -2,657,095.41 114.262300
912827S86 07.500% 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 16-OCT-1998 -2,657,095.41 0.00 114.262300
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 16-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 -9,031,914.06 -9,031,914.06 106.257812
9128272G6 06.2501 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 19-OCT-1998 9,031,914.06 9,031,914.06 106.257812
B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 -115,489.13 -115,489.13 106.257812
9126272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 106.257812
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-199B -9,147,403.19 -9,147,403.19 106.257812
9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 19-OCT-1998 -9,147,403.19 0.00 106.257812
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 -5,529,128.80 -5,529,128.80 106.329400
9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 09-NOV-1998 5,529,128.80 5,529,128.80 106.329400
B HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 -99,298.37 -89,198.37 106.329400
Page 11
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO O1/31/97 09-NOV-1998 0.00 0.00 106.329400
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,448,049.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 19-SEP-1998 -2,468,917.83 -2,468,917.83 99.837903
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 26-OCT-1998 -2,468,917.83 0.00 99.837903
IC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,448,432.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 -2,452,982.51 -2,452,982.51 100.185854
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 30-OCT-1998 2,452,982.51 2,452,982.51 100.185854
B BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,448,432.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 -25,806.67 -25,806.67 100.185854
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 100.185854
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,448,432.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 -2,478,789.18 -2,478,789.18 100.185854
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 30-OCT-1990 -2,478,789.18 0.00 100.185054
PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-SEP-1998 -1,059,148.69 -1,059,148.69 105.155200
9128273GS 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 14-OCT-1998 -1,059,148.69 0.00 105.155200
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 19-OCT-1998 -2,017,343.75 -2,017,343.75 100.867188
999ACV232 6.160% 11/25/2028 23-NOV-1998 2,017,343.75 2,017,343.75 100.867188
B GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PAY UPS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 -12,600.00 100.000000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1999 12,600.00 12,600.00 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 12
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1990 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 -12,600.00 100.000000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -12,600.00 0.00 100.000000
FC 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,723.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -7,723.00 -7,723.00 100.000000
9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 7,723.00 7,723.00 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,723.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -7,723.00 -7,723.00 100.000000
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -7,723.00 0.00 100.000000
PC O1-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 2.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,163.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1999 -8,163.00 -6,163.00 100.000000
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 8,163.00 8,163.00 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,163.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -8,163.00 -8,163.00 100.000000
9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -8,163.00 0.00 100.000000
PC 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
SALES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-OCT-1998 9.00 9.00 1.000000
996085247 02-OCT-1998 -9.00 -9.00 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-OCT-1998 9.00 9.00 1.000000
996085247 02-OCT-1998 9.00 0.00 1.000000
PC 02-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,455,670.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-OCT-1998 2,455,670.45 2,455,670.45 1.000000
Page 13
OCBG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE ERATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
996085247 08-OCT-1998 -2,455,670.45 -2,455,670.45 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,455,670.45 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-OCT-1999 2,455,670.45 2,455,670.45 1.000000
996085247 08-OCT-1999 2,455,670.45 0.00 1.000000
FC 08-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-571,506.12 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-OCT-1998 571,506.12 571,506.12 1.000000
996085247 09-OCT-1998 -571,506.12 -571,506.12 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-571,506.12 DREYFUS TREASURY CAST{ MGMT 09-OCT-1998 571,506.12 571,506.12 1.000000
996085247 09-OCT-1998 571,506.12 0.00 1.000000
PC 09-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,814,031.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-OCT-1998 3,914,031.52 3,014,031.52 1.000000
996005247 14-OCT-1998 -3,014,031.52 -3,814,031.52 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,814,031.52 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-OCT-1998 3,814,031.52 3,814,031.52 1.000000
996085247 14-OCT-1998 3,814,031.52 0.00 1.000000
PC 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,655,710.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-OCT-1990 2,655,710.59 2,655,710.59 1.000000
996085247 16-OCT-1998 -2,655,710.59 -2,655,710.59 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,655,710.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-OCT-1998 2,655,710.59 2,655,710.59 1.000000
996085247 16-OCT-1998 2,655,710.59 0.00 1.000000
PC 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
Page 14
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1999 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-1,585,446.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-OCT-1996 1,505,446.94 1,585,446.94 1.000000
996005247 19-OCT-1990 -1,505,446.94 -1,585,446.94 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-1,585,446.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-OCT-1998 1,585,446.94 1,585,446.94 1.000000
996095247 19-OCT-1999 1,585,446.94 0.00 1.000000
PC 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,066,612.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-OCT-1998 3,086,672.05 3,086,672.05 1.000000
996005247 19-OCT-1998 -3,086,672.05 -3,086,672.05 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 2.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,066,672.05 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-OCT-2998 3,086,672.05 3,086,672.05 1.000000
996085247 19-OCT-1998 3,086,672.05 0.00 1.000000
PC 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 2.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,017,501.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-OCT-1998 4,017,501.43 4,017,501.43 1.000000
996085247 21-OCT-1998 -4,017,501.43 -4,017,501.43 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,017,501.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-OCT-1998 4,017,501.43 4,017,501.43 1.000000
996085247 21-OCT-1996 4,017,501.43 0.00 1.000000
PC 21-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,571,438.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 29-OCT-1998 10,571,438.O6 10,571,438.06 1.000000
996085247 29-OCT-1998 -10,571,438.O6 -10,571,438.06 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 2.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,571,438.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-OCT-1998 10,571,438.06 10,571,438.06 1.000000
996005247 29-OCT-1998 10,571,438.06 0.00 1.000000
PC 29-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 15
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,681,666.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-OCT-1998 3,697,666.67 3,687,666.67 1.000000
996085247 30-OCT-1998 -3,687,666.67 -3,687,666.61 1.000000
S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,687,666.67 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-OCT-1998 3,687,666.67 3,687,666.67 1.000ODO
996085247 30-OCT-1998 3,607,666.67 0.00 1.000000
PC 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-193,998.65 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-OCT-1998 193,998.65 193,998.65 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 16-OCT-1998 -193,998.65 -193,998.65 1.000000
S 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-263,544.75 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 28-OCT-1998 263,544.75 263,544.75 1.000000
996007094 VAR RT DD O6/26/1997 28-OCT-1998 -263,544.75 -263,544.75 1.000000
S 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 4,601,601.54 4,601,601.54 102.257812
O1N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -4,585,916.44 -4,585,916.44 102.257812
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 15,685.10 15,685.10 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 -4,601,601.54 -4,601,601.54 102.257812
O1N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 4,585,916.44 4,585,916.44 102.257812
SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -15,685.10 -15,685.10 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUS GNMA SF MTG 07-OCT-1998 4,601,601.54 4,601,601.54 102.257812
O1N0626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 -4,585,916.44 -4,585,916.44 102.257812
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 15,685.10 15,685.10 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 4,552,031.25 4,552,031.25 101.156250
OIN0626B3 6.500% 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 -4,599,843.75 -4,599,843.15 101.156250
S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- -47,812.50 -47,812.50 1.000000000
Page 16
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 21-OCT-1998 -4,552,031.25 -4,552,031.25 101.156250
O1N0626B3 6.5008 11/15/2028 18-NOV-1998 4,599,843.75 4,599,843.75 101.156250
SC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 47,812.50 47,812.50 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF O6-OCT-1998 4,746,289.06 4,746,289.06 99.921875
02R060GA3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 -4,709,921.88 -4,709,921.88 99.921875
S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 36,367.18 36,367.18 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF O6-OCT-1998 4,746,289.06 4,746,289.06 99.921875
02R0606A3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 4,746,209.06 0.00 99.921875
PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 4,705,468.75 4,705,468.75 99.062500
02R0606BI 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 -4,745,546.88 -4,745,546.88 99.062500
S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -40,078.13 -40,078.13 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 19-OCT-1998 -4,705,468.75 -4,705,468.75 99.062500
02R0606B1 6.000% 11/15/2028 12-NOV-1998 4,745,546.88 4,745,546.88 99.062500
SC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 40,078.13 40,078.13 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 07-OCT-1998 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500
02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1996 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 102.437500
S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 12,890.62 12,890.62 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 07-OCT-1098 2,817,031.25 2,817,031.25 102.437500
02RO706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1996 2,817,031.25 0.00 102.437500
PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 02-OCT-1998 5,062,000.00 5,062,000.00 101.240000
31364FFM8 5.880% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 05-OCT-1998 -5,000,781.25 -5,000,701.25 201.240000
Page 17
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 61,218.75 61,218.15 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 02-OCT-1998 124,133.33 124,133.33 101.240000
31364FFM8 5.880% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 05-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 101.240000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 02-OCT-1998 5,186,133.33 5,186,133.33 101.240000
31364FFMB 5.880% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 05-OCT-1998 5,186,133.33 0.00 101.240000
PC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 05-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-404,143.86 FNMA POOL #0238575 19-OCT-1998 407,553.83 407,553.83 100.843751 -
3137006LB 6.1674 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 20-OCT-1998 -407,048.65 -407,048.65 100.843751
S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 505.18 505.18 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-404,143.86 FNMA POOL #0238575 19-OCT-1999 1,307.73 1,307.73 100.843751
31370Q6L8 6.167% 03/O1/2033 DD 09/01/93 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 100.843751
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00 '
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-404,143.B6 FNMA POOL #0238575 19-OCT-1998 408,861.56 408,861.56 100.843751
3137006L8 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 20-OCT-1998 408,861.56 0.00 100.843751
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-211,B04.03 FNMA POOL #0313769 19-OCT-1998 213,591.13 213,591.13 100.843750
31374GOW0 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 20-OCT-1998 -213,326.37 -213,326.37 100.843750
S GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY ----------- 264.76 264.76 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-211,804.03 FNMA POOL 00313769 19-OCT-1998 688.53 680.53 100.843750
31374GQW0 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 100.843750
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-211,804.03 FNNA POOL 10313769 19-OCT-1998 214,279.66 214,279.66 100.843750
Page 18
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-2998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
RASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
31374GONO 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 20-OCT-1998 214,279.66 0.00 100.843750
PC GOLDMAN SACKS 4 CO, NY 22-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-789,380.51 FNMA POOL #0313783 19-OCT-1999 796,099.79 796,099.79 100.851209
31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 20-OCT-1998 -795,054.18 -795,054.18 100.851209
S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 1,045.61 1,045.61 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-789,380.51 FNMA POOL #0313783 19-OCT-1990 2,568.22 2,568.22 100.851209
31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 20-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 100.851209
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-709,380.51 FNMA POOL #0313783 19-OCT-1998 798,668.01 798,668.01 100.851209
31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 20-OCT-1998 798,668.01 0.00 100.851209
PC GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY 22-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO
-585,856.57 FNMA POOL #0339016 19-OCT-1998 590,799.73 590,799.73 100.843750
31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 20-OCT-1998 -590,067.42 -590,067.41 100.843750
S GOLDMAN SACHS s CO, NY ----------- 732.32 732.32 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-585,856.57 FNMA POOL #0339016 19-OCT-1998 1,905.30 1,905.30 1DO.843750
31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 100.843750
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-585,856.57 FNMA POOL #0339016 19-OCT-1999 592,705.03 592,705.03 100.843750
31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 20-OCT-1998 592,705.03 0.00 100.843750
FC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,452,290.40 GNMA II POOL #0008684 27-OCT-1998 1,461,821.06 1,461,821.06 100.656250
36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 30-OCT-1998 -1,476,570.87 -1,476,570.87 100.656250
S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -14,749.81 -14,749.01 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 19
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ RASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-1,452,290.40 GNMA II POOL 10008684 27-OCT-1998 7,750.59 7,750.59 100.656250
36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 100.656250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,452,290.40 GNMA II POOL #0008694 27-OCT-1998 1,469,571.65 1,469,571.65 100.656250
36202KUH6 7.0001 08/20/2025 DD 08/01/95 30-OCT-1998 1,469,571.65 0.00 100.656250
PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 6,475,000.00 6,475,000.00 129.500000
912810DE5 11.1254 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 -6,233,593.75 -6,233,593.75 129.500000
S HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 241,406.25 241,406.25 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 114,877.72 114,877.72 129.500000
912810DE5 11.1251 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 129.500000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 6,589,877.72 6,589,877.72 129.500000
912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 6,589,077.72 0.00 129.500000
PC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 6,457,812.50 6,457,812.50 129.156250
912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DD 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 -6,404,325.00 -6,404,325.00 129.156250
S HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 53,487.50 53,497.50 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 114,877.72 114,877.72 129.156250
912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 129.156250
LS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 29-OCT-1998 6,572,690.22 6,572,690.22 129.156250
912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 30-OCT-1998 6,572,690.22 0.00 129.156250
PC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 20
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDDC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-2998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
RASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1998 3,162,812.50 3,162,812.50 109.062500
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 29-OCT-1998 -3,118,548.75 -3,118,548.75 109.062500
S BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK ----------- 44,263.75 44,263.75 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1998 98,702.45 98,702.45 109.062500
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 29-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 109.062500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1998 3,261,514.95 3,261,514.95 309.062500
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 29-OCT-1998 3,261,514.95 0.00 109.062500
PC BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK 29-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-43,300,000.OD U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 44,271,998.40 44,271,998.40 102.244800
912827R20 06.875% O8/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 20-OCT-1998 -44,141,730.35 -44,141,730.35 102.244800
S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB ----------- 130,268.05 130,268.05 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 411,170.58 411,170.58 102.244800
912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO OB/31/94 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 102.244800
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 44,683,166.98 44,683,168.98 102.244800
912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD O0/31/94 20-OCT-2998 44,683,168.98 0.00 102.244800
PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 44,274,250.00 44,274,250.00 102.250000
912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 19-OCT-1998 -44,141,730.35 -44,141,730.35 102.250000
S GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY ----------- 132,519.65 132,519.65 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 402,947.17 402,947.17 102.250000
912827R20 06.075% 09/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 102.250000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 21
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1998 44,677,197.17 44,677,197.17 102.250000
912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 19-OCT-1998 44,677,197.17 0.00 102.250000
PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 5,531,500.00 5,531,500.00 106.375000
9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 19-OCT-1998 -5,526,819.19 -5,526,819.19 106.375000
S HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 4,600.81 4,680.81 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 70,652.17 70,652.17 106.375000
9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DD 01/31/97 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 106.375000
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-OCT-1998 5,602,152.17 5,602,152.17 106.375000
9128272G6 06.250% 01/31/2002 DO 01/31/97 19-OCT-1998 5,602,152.17 0.00 106.375000
FC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 -2,439,292.35 -2,439,292.35 99.781250
9129273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 2,432,405.68 2,432,405.68 99.781250
SC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- -6,886.67 -6,886.67 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 -16,375.10 -16,375.10 99.781250
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 99.781250
Lsc ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 -2,455,667.45 -2,455,667.45 99.781250
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 -2,455,667.45 0.00 99.781250
FCC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 21-SEP-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,548,950.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-OCT-1998 2,546,153.45 2,540,153.45 99.968750
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-OCT-1998 -2,536,207.26 -2,536,207.26 99.968750
S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 11,946.19 11,946.19 1.000000000
Page 22
OCS0000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,548,950.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-OCT-1998 23,099.86 23,099.86 99.968750
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 99.968750
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,548,950.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-OCT-1998 2,571,253.31 2,571,253.31 99.968750
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-OCT-1998 2,571,253.31 0.00 99.968750
PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 15-OCT-1998 O.DD 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,448,048.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 2,452,638.09 2,452,638.09 100.187500
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 26-OCT-1998 -2,440,096.42 -2,440,096.42 100.187500
S BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 12,541.67 12,541.67 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,448,048.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 24,838.04 24,838.04 100.187500
9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 26-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 100.187500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
-2,448,048.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 23-OCT-1998 2,477,476.13 2,477,476.13 100.187500
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 26-OCT-1998 2,477,476.13 0.00 200.187500
PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-183,011.13 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-OCT-1998 283,011.13 183,011.13 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-OCT-1998 -182,632.24 -182,632.24 100.000000
PD ----------- 378.89 378.89 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-183,011.13 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-OCT-1998 183,011.13 183,011.13 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-OCT-1998 183,011.13 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 23
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-750,619.95 FHLMC GROUP #G5-0476 01-OCT-1998 750,619.85 750,619.85 100.000000
312ODD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-OCT-1998 -762,348.28 -762,348.28 100.000000
PD ----------- -11,728.43 -11,728.43 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-750,619.85 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-OCT-1998 750,619.85 750,619.85 100.000000
3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-OCT-1998 750,619.85 0.00 100.000000
FC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
117,422.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-SEP-1998 -117,422.00 -117,422.00 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.3241 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1998 117,550.43 117,550.43 100.000000
PDC ----------- 128.43 128.43 1.D00000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-117,421.65 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-SEP-1998 117,421.65 117,421.65 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1998 -117,550.06 -217,550.08 100.000000
PD ----------- -128.43 -128.43 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
117,421.65 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-SEP-1998 -117,421.65 -117,421.65 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1999 117,550.08 117,550.08 100.000000
PDC ----------- 128.43 128.43 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-117,421.65 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-SEP-1998 117,421.65 117,421.65 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324E 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1998 -117,550.08 -117,550.08 100.000000
PD ----------- -128.43 -128.43 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-117,421.65 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-SEP-1998 117,421.65 117,421.65 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1998 117,421.65 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-95,834.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-OCT-1998 95,834.00 95,034.00 100.000000
3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-OCT-1998 -95,938.82 -95,938.82 100.000000
PD ----------- -104.82 -104.82 1.000000000
0.00
Page 24
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDDC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-47,183.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-OCT-2998 47,183.70 47,183.70 100.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-OCT-1998 -47,117.35 -47,117.35 100.000000
PD ----------- 66.35 66.35 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
47,183.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-OCT-1998 -47,183.70 -47,183.70 100.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-OCT-1998 47,117.35 47,117.35 100.000000
PDC ----------- -66.35 -66.35 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-47,183.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-OCT-1996 47,183.70 47,183.70 100.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-OCT-1998 -47,117.35 -47,117.35 100.000000
PD ----------- 66.35 66.35 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-47,183.70 FNLMC MULTICL HIS P/C 1574 E O1-OCT-1998 47,183.70 47,183.70 100.000000
3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-OCT-1998 47,183.70 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
-8,628.62 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-OCT-1998 8,628.62 8,628.62 100.000000
31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-OCT-1998 -8,690.64 -8,690.64 100.000000
PD ----------- -62.02 -62.02 1.D00000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-8,628.62 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-OCT-1998 8,626.62 8,628.62 100.000000
31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-OCT-1998 8,628.62 0.00 100.000000
PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,395.63 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-OCT-1998 7,395.63 7,395.63 100.000000
3137006LB 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-OCT-1998 -7,448.79 -7,448.79 100.000000
PD ----------- -53.16 -53.16 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-7,395.63 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-OCT-1998 7,395.63 7,395.63 100.000000
3137006L8 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-OCT-1999 7,395.63 0.00 100.000000
PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 25
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,064.60 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-OCT-1999 14,064.60 14,064.60 100.000000
31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 01-OCT-1990 -14,165.69 -14,165.69 100.000000
PD ----------- -101.09 -101.09 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,064.60 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-OCT-1998 -14,064.60 -14,064.60 100.000000
31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-OCT-1998 14,165.69 14,165.69 100.000000
PDC ----------- 101.09 101.09 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,064.62 FNMA POOL $0313371 01-OCT-1998 14,064.62 14,064.62 100.000000
31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -14,165.71 -14,165.71 100.000000
PD ----------- -101.09 -101.09 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,064.62 FNMA POOL 00313371 01-OCT-1998 14,064.62 14,064.62 100.000000
31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO O2/01/97 01-OCT-1998 14,064.62 0.00 100.000000
PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,962.56 FNMA POOL 10313600 01-OCT-1998 13,961.56 13,961.56 100.000000
31374GKM8 6.143% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -14,061.91 -14,061.91 100.000000
PD ----------- -100.35 -100.35 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,961.56 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-OCT-1998 -13,961.56 -13,961.56 100.000000
31374GKMS 6.143% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 14,061.91 14,061.91 100.000000
PDC ----------- 300.35 100.35 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,961.56 FNMA POOL 00313600 01-OCT-1998 13,961.56 13,961.56 100.000000
31374GKMO 6.143% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-OCT-1999 -14,061.91 -14,061.91 100.000000
PD ----------- -100.35 -100.35 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,961.56 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-OCT-2998 13,961.56 13,961.56 100.000000
31374GKMB 6.1431 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 13,961.56 0.00 100.000000
PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 26
OCSGOOD100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,569.34 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-OCT-1999 3,569.34 3,569.34 100.000000
31374GOWO 6.1511 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -3,594.99 -3,594.99 100.000000
PD ----------- -25.65 -25.65 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,569.34 FNMA POOL 10313769 01-OCT-1998 -3,569.34 -3,569.34 100.000000
31374GQWO 6.151% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-OCT-1990 3,594.99 3,594.99 100.000000
PDC ----------- 25.65 25.65 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,569.34 FNMA POOL 10313769 01-OCT-1998 3,569.34 3,569.34 100.000000
31374GONO 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -3,594.99 -3,594.99 100.000000
PD ----------- -25.65 -25,65 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,569.34 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-OCT-1998 3,569.34 3,569.34 100.000000
31374GQVO 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-OCT-1998 3,569.34 0.00 100.000000
PC 26-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,081.77 PNNA POOL #0313783 01-OCT-1990 14,081.77 14,081.77 100.000000
31374GRC3 6.157% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-OCT-1999 -14,102.98 -14,182.98 100.000000
PD ----------- -101.21 -101.21 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,081.77 PUMA POOL #0313783 01-OCT-1998 -14,081.77 -14,081.77 100.000000
31374GRC3 6.157% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-OCT-1998 14,192.98 14,182.98 100.000000
PDC ----------- 101,21 101.21 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,081.77 FNMA POOL /0313783 01-OCT-1998 14,081.77 14,081.77 100.000000
31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DD 10/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -14,192.98 -14,162.98 100.000000
PD ----------- -301.21 -101.21 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-14,081.77 FNMA POOL 10313783 01-OCT-1998 14,091.77 14,061.77 100.000000
31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-OCT-1996 14,081.77 0.00 100.000000
Page 27
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURE GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
FC 27-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,792.95 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-OCT-1998 13,792.95 13,792.95 100.000000
31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-OCT-1998 -13,892.09 -13,992.09 100.000000
PD ----------- -99.14 -99.14 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,792.95 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-OCT-1998 -13,792.95 -13,792.95 100.000000
31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-OCT-1990 13,892.09 13,892.09 100.000000
PDC ----------- 99.14 99.14 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-13,793.71 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-OCT-1998 13,793.71 13,793.71 100.000000
31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-OCT-1998 -13,892.85 -13,892.85 100.D00000
PD ----------- -99.14 -99.14 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-13,793.71 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-OCT-1996 13,793.71 13,793.71 100.000000
31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-OCT-1998 13,793.71 0.00 100.000000
PC 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 . 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-22,755.49 FIFTH THIRD SK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-OCT-1996 22,755.49 22,755.49 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-OCT-1998 -22,755.49 -22,755.49 100.000000
PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-22,755.49 -FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-OCT-1998 22,755.49 22,755.49 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-OCT-1998 22,755.49 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-92,899.52 GNMA II POOL #0008684 01-OCT-1998 92,899.52 92,899.52 100.000000
36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DD 08/01/95 01-OCT-1998 -94,452.68 -94,452.68 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,553.16 -1,553.16 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
92,899.52 GNMA II POOL #0008684 01-OCT-1990 -92,899.52 -92,899.52 100.000000
Page 28
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST "
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
36202KUHG 7.000% 08/20/2025 DD 00/01/95 01-OCT-1998 94,452.68 94,452.60 100.000000
PDC ----------- 1,553.16 1,553.16 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-92,878.24 GNMA II POOL 00008684 01-OCT-1998 92,078.24 92,878.24 100.000000
36202KUH6 7.000% 00/20/2025 DD 00/01/95 01-OCT-1998 -94,431.05 -94,431.05 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,552.81 -1,552.01 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-92,878.24 GNMA II POOL 40008684 01-OCT-1998 92,878.24 92,870.24 100.000000
36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DD 09/01/95 01-OCT-1999 92,078.24 0.00 100.000000
FC 20-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-160,474.30 GNMA II POOL 10080023 01-OCT-1998 160,474.30 160,474.30 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-OCT-1990 -163,132.16 -163,132.16 100.000000
PD ----------- -2,657.86 -2,657.86 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
160,474.30 GNMA II POOL 10080023 01-OCT-1998 -160,474.30 -160,474.30 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-OCT-1998 163,132.16 163,132.16 200.000000
PDC ----------- 2,657.86 2,657.86 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-160,470.10 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-OCT-1998 160,470.10 160,470.10 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.0001 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-OCT-1998 -163,127.89 -163,127.89 100.000000
PD ----------- -2,657.79 -2,657.79 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-160,470.10 GNMA II POOL /0080023 01-OCT-1998 160,470.10 160,470.10 100.000000
36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-OCT-1998 160,470.10 0.00 100.000000
FC 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-291,167.14 GNMA II POOL 1080008M 01-OCT-1998 291,167.14 291,167.14 100.000000
36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -297,536.42 -297,536.42 100.000000
PD ----------- -6,369.28 -6,369.29 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERN OPER-PINCO
Page 29
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1990 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
291,161.14 GNMA II POOL 1080068M O1-OCT-1998 -291,167.14 -291,167.14 100.000000
36225CC20 6.075% 06/20/2027 DD O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 297,536.42 297,536.42 100.000000
PDC ----------- 6,369.28 6,369.28 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-291,161.32 GNMA II POOL 1080088M O1-OCT-1990 291,161.32 291,161.32 100.000000
36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -297,530.47 -297,530.47 100.000000
PD ----------- -6,369.25 -6,369.15 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
291,161.32 GNMA II P00L 1080086M O1-OCT-1998 -291,161.32 -291,161.32 100.000000
36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-OCT-1998 297,530.47 297,530.47 100.000000
PDC ----------- 6,369.15 6,369.15 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-291,161.32 GNMA II POOL 1080086M O1-OCT-1998 291,161.32 291,161.32 100.000000
36225CC20 6.075% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-OCT-1998 -297,530.47 -297,530.47 100.000000
PD ----------- -6,369.15 -6,369.15 1.000000000
0.00
TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-291,161.32 GNMA II POOL 1080088M O1-OCT-1999 291,161.32 291,161.32 100.000000
36225CC20 6.8751 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1990 291,161.32 0.00 100.000000
PC 20-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-263,544.75 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 25-OCT-1998 263,544.75 263,544.75 100.000000
78442GBA3 FLTG AT 04/25/2007 DD 06/18/98 25-OCT-1998 -263,544.75 -263,544.75 100.000000
PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-263,544.75 STUDENT IN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 25-OCT-1998 263,544.75 263,544.75 100.000000
78442GBA3 FLTG AT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 25-OCT-1990 263,544.75 0.00 100.000000
PC 27-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
MATURITIES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,900,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC 23-OCT-1998 2,872,544.25 2,872,544.25 100.000000
3133131,63 NAT 10/23/1990 23-OCT-1998 -2,872,544.25 -2,872,544.25 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 23-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 30
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 16-OCT-1998 2,371,454.67 2,371,454.67 100.000000
313385K70 MAT 10/16/199B 16-OCT-1998 -2,371,454.67 -2,371,454.67 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BK CONS DISC 19-OCT-1998 295,913.42 295,913.42 100.000000
313385L20 MAT 10/19/1998 19-OCT-1998 -295,913.42 -295,913.42 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
CORPORATE ACTIONS
U.S. DOLLAR
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-193,132.46 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 19-OCT-1998 193,132.46 193,132.46 100.000000
21075NDKB 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 19-OCT-1998 -192,717.53 -192,717.53 100.000000
CAL ----------- 414.93 414.93 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-193,132.46 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 19-OCT-1998 193,132.46 193,132.46 300.000000
21075NDKO 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 19-OCT-1998 193,132.46 0.00 100.000000
FC 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
INTEREST
V.S. DOLLAR
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
183,011.13 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-OCT-1998 10,997.52 10,987.52 0.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-OCT-1998 10,997.52 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 21-OCT-1998 19,470.80 19,470.80 0.000000
171200EBO FLTG RT O8/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 15-OCT-1990 19,470.80 0.00 0.000000
IT 21-OCT-1998 D.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
193,132.46 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 15-OCT-1998 549.73 549.73 0.000000
21075NDKO 6.190% 10/15/2012 DO 11/23/96 01-OCT-1996 549.73 0.00 0.000006
IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 31
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-193,132.46 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 15-OCT-1998 -549.73 -549.73 0.000000
21075WDKB 6.19D4 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-OCT-1998 -549.73 0.00 0.000000
ITC 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 15-OCT-1998 996.24 996.24 0.000000
21075NDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-OCT-1998 996.24 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.00D000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
750,619.85 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 15-OCT-1998 96,774.89 96,774.89 0.000000
312ODD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-OCT-1998 96,774.89 0.00 D.000000
IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
117,421.65 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-OCT-1998 23,388.14 23,388.14 0.000000
3133TCE95 6.324E 00/15/2032 DI-SEP-1998 23,388.14 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF III A6 26-OCT-1998 20,833.33 10,833.33 0.000000
3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 25-OCT-1998 10,833.33 0.00 0.000000
IT 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
47,183.70 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-OCT-1998 6,204.61 6,204.61 0.000000
3133TO2D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-OCT-1998 6,204.61 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,900,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 23-OCT-1998 27,455.75 27,455.75 0.000000
3133131,63 MAT 10/23/1998 23-OCT-1998 27,455.75 0.00 0.000000
IT 23-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 16-OCT-1998 28,545.33 28,545.33 0.000000
313385K70 MAT 10/16/1996 16-OCT-1998 20,545.33 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 32
OCSGOOOIDO MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS DISC 19-OCT-1998 4,086.58 4,086.58 0.000000
3133851,20 MAT 10/19/1998 19-OCT-1998 4,066.58 0.00 0.000000
IT 19-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,628.62 FNMA POOL #0065581 26-OCT-1998 2,388.40 2,388.40 0.000000
31362M2N7 6.3918 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-OCT-1998 2,388.40 0.00 0.000000
IT 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 28-OCT-1998 106,533.33 106,533.33 0.000000
31364BWF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 20-AUG-1998 106,533.33 0.00 0.000000
IT 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN MTN 19-OCT-1998 265,000.00 265,000.00 0.000000
31364CBD9 6.625% 04/18/2001 DO 04/19/96 18-OCT-1998 265,000.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 19-OCT-1998 0.00 O.OD 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,395.63 FNMA POOL #0239575 26-OCT-1998 2,102.62 2,102.62 0.000000
3137006LO 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-OCT-1998 2,102.62 0.00 0.000000
IT 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
14,064.62 PUMA POOL #0313371 26-OCT-1999 4,693.64 4,693.64 0.000000
31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-OCT-1998 4,693.64 0.00 0.000000
IT 26-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,961.56 FNMA POOL #0313600 26-OCT-1998 4,552.08 4,552.08 0.000000
31374GKM8 6.143% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-OCT-1998 4,552.08 D.00 0.000000
IT 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
3,569.34 FNMA POOL 40313769 26-OCT-1998 1,101.35 1,101.35 0.000000
31374GOWO 6.136% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-OCT-1998 1,101.35 0.00 0.000000
Page 33
OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1990 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
IT 26-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
14,091.77 FNMA POOL 00313783 27-OCT-1998 4,110.01 4,110.01 0.000000
31374GRC3 6.138% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-OCT-1998 4,110.01 0.00 0.000000
IT 27-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
13,793.71 FNMA POOL #0339016 26-OCT-1998 3,213.61 3,223.61 0.000000
31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-OCT-1998 3,213.61 0.00 0.000000
IT 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
22,755.49 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-OCT-1998 1,618.84 1,618.84 0.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-OCT-1998 1,618.84 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CA MTN TR 4 00177 30-SEP-1998 -94,785.00 -94,785.00 0.000000
345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 30-SEP-1998 -94,785.00 0.00 0.000000
ITC 30-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CA MTN TR 4 00177 30-SEP-1998 95,564.05 95,564.05 0.000000
345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 30-SEP-1998 95,564.05 0.00 0.000000
IT 30-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
92,078.24 GNMA II POOL 10008684 20-OCT-1998 9,013.48 9,013.48 0.000000
36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 01-OCT-1998 9,013.48 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
160,470.10 GNMA II POOL 00080023 20-OCT-1998 16,147.65 16,147.65 0.000000
36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-OCT-1999 16,147.65 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
291,161.32 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 20-OCT-1998 23,226.30 23,216.30 0.000000
Pago 34
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
36225CC20 6.875► 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-OCT-1998 23,216.30 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 01-OCT-1998 129,375.00 229,375.00 0.000000
37042RK04 8.625% 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 01-OCT-1998 129,375.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 01-OCT-1998 33,500.00 33,500.00 0.000000
37042NGK1 6.700% 04/30/2001 DO 04/25/96 01-OCT-1998 33,500.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT 28-OCT-1998 45,520.83 45,520.83 0.000000
423328AZ6 FLTG AT 04/27/1999 DO 04/27/94 27-OCT-1998 45,520.83 0.00 0.000000
IT 28-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 01-OCT-1998 79,687.50 79,687.50 0.000000
59018SXP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 01-OCT-1998 79,687.50 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MTN 07-OCT-1998 175,500.00 175,500.00 O.000D00
63858JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 07-OCT-1998 175,500.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 07-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al 27-OCT-1998 98,669.32 98,669.32 0.000000
78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 25-OCT-1998 98,669.32 0.00 0.000000
IT 27-OCT-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 01-OCT-1998 12,600.00 12,600.00 0.000000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JUL-1998 12,600.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 35 -- _
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-12,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT O1-OCT-1998 -12,600.00 -22,600.00 0.000000
9128212M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JUL-1990 -12,600.00 0.00 0.000000
ITC 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT O1-OCT-1998 12,600.00 12,600.00 0.000000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 01-OCT-1998 12,600.00 0.00 0.000000
CD RECEIVED INTEREST O1-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
OCTOBER 1998 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,723.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT O1-OCT-1998 7,723.00 7,723.00 0.000000
9129273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 7,723.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,723.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT O1-OCT-1998 -7,723.00 -7,723.00 0.000000
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -7,723.00 0.00 0.000000
ITC O1-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT O1-OCT-1998 7,723.00 7,723.00 0.000000
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 01-OCT-1998 7,723.00 0.00 0.000000
CD RECEIVED INTEREST O1-OCT-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
OCTOBER 1998 0.00
LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO
8,163.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 30-OCT-1998 8,163.00 8,163.00 0.000000
9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 8,163.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 30-OCT-1998 0.00 O.OD 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SHORT TERM PUS INT ADJ 30-OCT-1998 -10,924.91 -10,824.91 0.000000
990000PJ9 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 30-OCT-1998 -10,824.91 0.00 0.000000
CN AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 30-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT O1-OCT-1998 685.B8 685.88 0.000000
996085247 01-OCT-1998 685.88 0.00 0.000000
IT O1-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 36
s
r
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-OCT-1998 - 31-OCT-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGHT 01-OCT-1998 8,334.21 8,334.21 0.000000
996085247 01-OCT-1998 8,334.21 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 37
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MewngUMe Toed moo-.
11/le/99
AGENDA REPORT IMmNumber Item Number
Orange County Sanitation
FROM: David LuDistrict ctor of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT:
GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and Tier 1
Environmental Impact Statement for the Groundwater Replenishment System,
dated November 5, 1998
SUMMARY
The Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District
(OCWD), joint sponsors of the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS),
have prepared the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report and Tier 1
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIR/EIS)for public review in accordance with
State of California and Federal laws.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Not applicable
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
On December 15, 1997 a Notice of Preparation for the DEIR/EIS was issued,
and scoping sessions were held in January 1998. The DEIR/EIS addresses
comments received from the public and government agencies during the scoping
process. An informational open house will be held on December 1, 1998 at
OCWD from 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. A formal Public Hearing will be held before
the Joint OCSD/OCWD GWRS Committee on December 8, 1998 at 6:00 p.m.
Certification of the DEIR/EIS will be considered at the March, 1999 regular Board
Meeting.
ALTERNATIVES
Not applicable
G\nlpladeMpenda p,aX FeNneVum.1.11 tlB9&eMM6Lle dx
fiev,aed d 8 Page 1
CEQA FINDINGS
Pending
ATTACHMENTS
None.
G Mp bNNyerga paX Re W r6 W nl Boarp1111 B[V rRrv[dXb px
RMu^ Xaa�X Page 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation
District, to be held on P'I/!/1*4ee 199t was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on
�/"� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this��day of
�/Ulti-ri �c,
Penny M. Ky[4/Secretapfj
Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
HA W R DTA\ADMIMBS\FORMSTVA