Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-10-28 q,.....- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT October 22, 1998 phone: (7141982.2411 .111.9 add...; NOTICE OF MEETING P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valle,OA 92728-8127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS street address: versus ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT tOe44 Ellie Avenue Pouncain Valle,CN 9270E-7018 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1998 — 6:30 P.M. DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Marcher 10844 Ellis Avenue Ag...Its Fountain Valley, California 92708 Y 61eies The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Anaheim Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. area Buena Perk Cypress Fountain Vellay Fullerton Garden Grove Huntington Beech Irvine La Habra L. Palms Los Alamitos Newpan eases Board Secretary Orange Placentia Santa Ana seal anion Sranron Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Penn Ville Perk roroa ands County of Grange STEERING COMMITTEE/AD HOC Sanitary District. COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, October 28, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. Cosa Mass Midway Ciry OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND Water Districts TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 4, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Irvine Roncb PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, November 5, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE/AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday, November 18, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. -ID Protect too Pucho Health end the Environment through Excellence in Westewater Systems' BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting October October 28, 1998 November November 18, 1998 December December 16, 1998 January January 27, 1999 February February 24, 1999 March March 24, 1999 April April 28, 1999 May May 26, 1999 June June 23, 1999 July July 28, 1999 August August 25, 1999 September September 22, 1999 October October 27, 1999 November November 17, 1999 AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 28, 1998—6:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion '. and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 10/28/98 Page 2 of 6 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on September 23, 1998 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: 08/31/98 09/16/98 09/30/98 Totals $3,013,736.27 1 $3 200 070.37 $2,074.950.87 CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEM NOS. 9- 12) All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: 9. Authorize the General Manager to execute a Quitclaim Deed for a 206 square foot parcel in Banning Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach to Gary Gumbert, in a forth acceptable to General Counsel. 10. (1) Receive and file petition from David and Carol Day to annex 0.751 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Highcliff Drive and Brier Lane in the unincorporated area of Cowan Heights (Annexation No. OCSD-1 — Day Annexation); and (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-47. authorizing initiation of annexation of said territory to the District. 11. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-48, ordering Annexation No. OCSD-2- Portion of Tract No. 14185, in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Country Hills Road in the City of Anaheim, to the District 10/28/98 Page 3 of 6 12. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-49, ordering Annexation No. OCSD-3- Deutsch Annexation, in the vicinity of Foothill Boulevard and East Lemon Heights Drive in the unincorporated area of Orange County, to the District. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 13. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 10/28/98 Page 4 of 6 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re October 28, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 28, 1998 to be filed. C. Authorize approval of a Cost-sharing Memorandum of Understanding between Kem County and Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)to help mitigate and repair Kern County roads traversed by biosolids-hauling trucks, containing the following elements, in a forth approved by General Counsel: (1) $2.12 per ton fee paid by OCSD for transported biosolids on impacted roads; (2) Agreement that Kern County will conduct and fund a comprehensive traffic impact study within 12 months; and (3) Prepayment of$750,000 to Kem County to be refunded via tonnage credits over an approximate 5-10 year period. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re October 14, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 14, 1998 to be filed. C. (1) Increase the Year 2000 Date Change Budget Authorization from $500,000 to $2,141,500 for staff labor, material, and outside service costs through June 30, 1999; and (2)Approve Phase 2 of the Professional Services Agreement for Year 2000 Compliance project management and documentation services with Bristol Systems, Inc.for$160,000 for the period November 1998 to June 1999. d. (1) Approve an agreement with Municipal Water District of Orange County(MWDOC)for a multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program and direct staff to participate in Programs 1 and 2 for an amount not to exceed$150,000; and (2)Authorize staff to enter into a pilot project with MWDOC for Program 3 in an amount not to exceed $33,000. 16. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re October 8, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only):The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 8, 1998 to be filed. C. Ratify Change Order No. 6 to Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage &Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage&Water Distribution 10/28/98 Page 5 of 6 System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55 with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of$101,202 and 59 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $13.701.058. d. Ratify Change Order No. 15 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction authorizing a net addition amount of$122,912 and 38 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $35,499.357. e. Approve Professional Services Agreement with MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, Inc. for Improvements to Existing Mechanical Systems, Job No. J-62, for an amount not to exceed $154,760. 17. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re October 21, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 21, 1998 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 1998. d. Authorize the base salaries for the positions of Assistant General Manager, Director of Communications, Director of Information Technology and Controller to be above the maximum of the pay ranges. 18. (1)Approve the plans and specifications for Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P247.1, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2)Approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications; (3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and (4)Award a contract to Southern Contracting Company for Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P247-1,for an amount not to exceed $1,271,000. 19. (1)Approve plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1444, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; (2) Receive and file letter dated October 5, 1998, from Valley Waterproofing, Inc., protesting the waterproofing applicator qualifications for all bids; (3) Receive and file memorandum dated October 13, 1998, from General Counsel; (4) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation rejecting all bids; and (5) Authorize the General Manager to set the dale for receipt of bids for Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1 44 4 (Rebid). 20. Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Robert Burge, at al. v. Sanitation District of Orange County, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 800278, and authorize District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. 10/28/98 Page 6 of 6 21. CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in dosed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted dosed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(C). 2. Confer with General Counsel re pending matter of litigation for Robert Burge, et al. v. Sanitation District of Orange County, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 800278 (Government Code Section 54956.9. 3. Evaluation of General Manager's performance (Government Code Section 54957). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in dosed session 22. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 23. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 24. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 25. Adjournments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the dose of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 HAw dla%adm3n SSWBenda\1028M dra0.dm / Q l CHAIRMAN'S REPORT BOARD MEETING OF OCTOBER 28,1998 1 . WITH THE HOLIDAYS APPROACHING, I WANT TO CALL YOUR ATTENTION TO THE LIST OF UPCOMING MEETINGS. BECAUSE OF THANKSGIVING THE NOVEMBER BOARD MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THE THIRD WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18T", AND BECAUSE OF CHRISTMAS THE DECEMBER BOARD MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THE THIRD WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16TH. THESE DATES ARE ONE WEEK EARLIER THAN USUAL. THE FAHR COMMITTEE IS NOT SCHEDULED TO MEET IN NOVEMBER AND JANUARY. IF THIS CHANGES, YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED. 2. YOU HAVE ALL BEEN INVITED TO THE INAUGURATION OF THE COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS STATION THIS FRIDAY, OCTOBER 30TH, BETWEEN 10 AND NOON AT THE DISTRICT. THIS PROJECT IS AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLE OF AGENCIES COOPERATING TOGETHER i FOR THE GOOD OF ALL. IT IS A PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT BETWEEN THE DISTRICT, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, POWER SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, BATTELLE, AND PIMA GRO, ONE OF THE BIOSOLIDS HAULERS. I URGE YOU TO COME IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. 3. 2 ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: October 28. 1998 TIME: 6:30 a.m. (HOLMBERG)........ANDERSON ..................i ✓ _ (FLORY)...............BANKHEAD .................... 1/ — (BOYD)................BROWN .......................�G i (COOK) ...............COLLINS...................... �G �G — (NOYES) ..............DEBAY......................... y/ ✓ — (FRESCHI)............DENES......................... 7 _ (DOTSON) ...........DONAHUE.................... . (PARKER).............DUNLAP.......................y/ (UNDERHILL)........ECKENRODE................. Qi _ (PERRY)...............FERRYMAN .................. ✓ _ (WISNER).............GULLIXSON................... f� (BROADWATER) ...LEYES..........................� _— (MAULLER) ..........MARSHALL .................. . _ (LUTZ).................MC GUIGAN ................. ✓ _✓ _ (WALKER)............MINER-BRADFORD ........ ✓(COONTZ)............MURPHY......................� �e (KEENAN) ............PIERCY ........................�C — (EVANS)..............RICE............................ � 1G — (POTTS) ..............SALTARELLI .................gam — (HAMMOND)........SHEA........................... (SPITZER) ............STEINER ...................... (HARMAN)............S6tLL4V*W ................... .. y (MILLER)..............SWAN ......................... �G — (BATES) ..............SYLVIA........................ � — (DALY) ................ZEMEL.........................� STAFF: Anderson ✓ �2UPiL J Ghirelli ✓ p�,a,p Gam^""' Hodges d Kyle Ludwin McIntyre ✓ Miles ✓ Ooten Peterman ✓ Streed Tuchman OTHERS: Woodruff ✓ Andrus STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District, to be held on // /ate . 19 1 was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this�l day of 1» , Igy Penny M. K I , Se ry Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District H A W P MMADM I MBS1 FOR MSIFI7A ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) Board Secretary October 21, 1998 Please: 1714)962 2411 To the Chair and Members of the Board of Directors m.11lap adds...: P0. Bot 8127 Fountain valley.CA Subject: Board Letter 92728 8127 atr.se ad ue loeaa EJlid Avella nue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional Faanwm valley.g information on any of the items, please call me. 927M 7018 LIMS System Up and RunninD Member The District approved the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) project Apencle. in February 1997. The laboratory committed that there would be productivity S improvements, a reduction in data entry errors, and customers would receive data Cities and reports in a manner that would simplify information management. Anahean Brad The physical implementation of the LIMS was completed during the spring of this Buena Part year. For the past several months the lab has been engaged in "shaking the system cyPfQ$y down" and making It art of the normal work routine. LIMS currently controls man of Fountain Valley 9 P Y Y Fullaron the information management functions of the lab including sample handling, data Garden Grbya acquisition, quality assurance, and report generation. Huntington Reach o-mne Le Habra This month, the LIMS project team celebrates the successful accomplishment of Le Pelma three major project milestones. First, the Discharge Monitoring Report DMR has Loa aemima 1 P 1 9 9 P ( ) NisxPart 8 ..h been formatted to electronically receive data directly from LIMS. Previously, lab data orange were manually entered into the DMR forms. We estimate a timesaving of about 20-30 Placer: same An hours each month for this project. Seal Beach sud w^ Second, Source Control inspectors now pre-schedule their work in LIMS, and in the Mlle Part process pre-log samples in the database. Labels for sample bottles, including a Maros Linda barcode, are automatically printed so that the lab receives the sample by simply ceanty ar or.ne. scanning the barcode. A significant portion of the Source Control sample paperwork is also printed directly and automatically from LIMS. sanitary Districts Third, the integration of the LIMS with the Source Control database was completed. Cosh Mesa On October 1, a "switch"was literally and figuratively thrown which automates the Midway city reporting of Laboratory data to Source Control. Daily, LIMS automatically sends a Water Districts printed report to Source Control indicating which data files have been transferred and Inane Panrh which ones are wailing to be transferred. For the laboratory alone, this one automation process has saved approximately 60 to 70 hours per month. To date, the saving of time in the laboratory due to LIMS automation amounts to about 80 to 100 hours each month (about 0.5 FTE). The success is due, in large part, to the teamwork displayed by everyone involved in these projects. Staff 'To Protect the Public Health and the Envirenment through Excellence in wastewater Systems" Members of the Board of Directors Page 2 October 21. 1998 members from the Laboratory, Source Control and Information Technology have dedicated themselves to making these projects work. In the process, a greater understanding of each division's functions have developed. In addition to the successes with LIMS, the laboratory received certification from the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project for performing sediment and other analyses for the ongoing regional Bight studies. This is significant because only two participating laboratories in the regional program are completely certified. It is even more significant because the laboratory has not routinely performed analyses on marine sediments, and this activity involved development and validation of several new analytical procedures. Congratulations are due to the staff of all sections of the lab. Request for Relief—New Rate Structure Staff has been working with a restaurant owner in Huntington Beach who has also contacted Director Sullivan, Mayor Dettloff and Supervisor Silva about his user fees. His restaurant has 3,510 sq. ft. and the charge on the tax bill for 1998-99 is $696.38. The charge for last year was $137.63. Upon receiving our mail out advising of the proposed rate structure change and the impact on annual fees, the property owner called to complain about the very high increase. The rate change from $50.05 to$480.00 per thousand square feet and the then-existing annual fee of$137.63 were shown on the mail out, along with instructions for calculating the new annual fee. At that time, the new annual fee, calculated on the basis of the mail out, would have been $1,684.80, but the rate adjustment was subsequently spread over 3 years. When staff reminded the property owner of the option of basing the charge on actual water use rather than the new rate structure per 1000 sq. ft., he submitted his water bills and the alternative charge was calculated. Unfortunately, staff did not use the new alternative formula which accounts for Bow, SOD and TBS. Instead, we used the old alternative of$777.57/mg of water purchased, that is only based upon average Single Family Residence (SFR)Bow. The result of that calculation was an annual charge of$416. The property owner now says that based upon the reduction of the annual fee to $416, he decided it was not worth his time to launch a major effort to defeat the rate structure change. When the 1998-99 lax bill was received, however, the user fee was $696.38. This is the product of the 3,510 sq, ff. and the $198.40/1000 sq. ff. rate adopted for 1998-99. Members of the Board of Directors Page 3 October 21, 1998 The property owner believes that we "misled" him by giving him incorrect information. He claims that we took away his option to campaign for a rate structure change and "blindsided" him. Staff has agreed that we made a mistake when we originally calculated the alternative fee, but that our desire was to help him immediately, not to make him wait for an answer, and certainly not to mislead him. Unfortunately, staff had not been properly trained on the change in the alternative calculation method because we were concentrating on the proposed rate structure. We were expecting alternative calculation requests to come in later. We also advised the property owner of the Rate Advisory Committee process and that restaurants had not been paying their fair share in the past. The property owner would like his charge reduced to the level he was "promised" when he called. He has been advised, after discussion with General Counsel, that we cannot do that, but that we must enforce the Ordinance as adopted. He has also been reminded that the adopted Ordinance provides for a phased-in increase of the percentage of the SFR rate to 424% and 600% per 1000 sq. ft. over the next two years, rather than the immediate implementation of the 600% rate originally proposed. This phase-in, coupled with the already adopted rates for SFR, would increase the fee for this restaurant to $1339 and $2132, respectively. Explanations to date have not satisfied the property owner, and he may attend a future Board meeting to make his case in person. OCIP Earlier this month, counsel for the Orange County Investment Pool participants requested that the County immediately release $30 million. These funds are from two different sources and should be distributed differently. In 1996, the County auditors "found" $12 million, the source of which remains unknown. What is known is that these funds must have been on hand, but unaccounted for, when the 1995"Interest Allocation Agreement' between the County and each OCIP participant was executed. No source of these funds subsequent to the Agreement can be identified. Because the amount of funds reported to be on hand at the time of the Agreement were determined by the County and its accountant, the OCIP participants have requested that these funds be distributed in accordance with the April 23, 1996 letter agreement reagrding "Reduction in Pool Losses Resulting from Litigation". This agreement also includes money"related to the liquidation of the securities held by the pools". Under the terms of this Agreement, the $12 million would first be split equally between the County and the OCIP. The Sanitation District would then receive approximately 6.2%, or$372,000. Members of the Board of Directors Page 4 October 21, 1998 The other$18 million are the funds remaining in the Disputed Claims Reserve from the settlement of the Appaloosa claim. The Second Amended Plan of Adjustment provides that funds originally set aside for the resolution of a claim to be categorized as "litigation proceeds" if they remain after the settlement of the claim. Those are the fads for these funds. At this point in the distribution of litigation proceeds, 60% of the proceeds are to be allocated to the OCIP. The District can expect to receive approximately$1.3 million if these funds are distributed. If the County agrees with the OCIP opinion regarding this $30 million, then the combined share due to the District is approximately $1.7 million. As the Directors are already aware, none of the proceeds of settlements during 1997-98 have been distributed pending approval of the court. Staff has estimated the District share of these settlements to be $43.6 million. If all of these estimates and assumptions are accurate, and the funds are ultimately distributed, the remaining amount due from the County is approximately $35 million. Electrical Vehicle Loan Program The SCAOMD's Board has initiated a three-year electric vehicle loan program for government agencies. The program aims to familiarize government agencies with electric vehicles and encourage them to purchase or lease electric vehicles in the future. Ten electric vehicles will be housed at State's Department of General Services garages in Southern California. They will be loaned to state and local government agencies for periods ranging from one day to several months. SCAOMD will contribute $80,000 toward the $640,000 project. If your city or agency might be interested in this program, contact Mike Nazemi at SCAOMD's Technology Advancement Office (909-396-3187). Odor Control Efforts In the recent months there has been an increase in odor complaints in the vicinity of Plant 2. The District promptly responds to any odor concerns by logging an odor complaint report and immediately sending an employee to investigate the concern. The majority of the odors reported in the past two months are not related to Plant 2 operations. They are linked to collections work being done by the District and City of Huntington Beach, as well as the flood control system operated by the City of Huntington Beach. In an effort to proactively address any future concerns, the District has two teams addressing odor issues. The Odor Control Team, which includes staff from v a' Members of the Board of Directors Page 5 October 21, 1998 Operatons & Maintenance, responds to odor control issues in the two treatment plants. Their goal is to eliminate all fugitive odor sources from the two plants and to improve the automation of the existing odor control systems. The second team (OC3), covers odor and corrosion control issues for the collection system, and includes members from Operations, Engineering, the Collection Facilities, and Source Control. The OC3 program's purpose is to reduce the incidence of odor and corrosion in the sewer systems and provide beneficial information and services to process management at the two treatment plants. In the near future, these teams will be integrated, to form one Odor and Corrosion Control Team that will address all odor and corrosion concerns. The Air Quality and Special Projects Division is working with the Communications Department to develop an odor information brochure to distribute to residents in the areas adjacent to the two treatment plants and out in the service area, prior to and during any trunk line work in their communities. The calls we have received from the community have been, for the most part, friendly in nature. The residents have indicated the District is doing a good job and that they want to report odor incidents to help us resolve any problems quickly and efficiently. Several of the calls have come from members of the Southeast Huntington Beach Homeowner's Association. District staff has been meeting with members of this association recently, and this may lead to a higher than normal number of complaints or calls in the short term while staff pursue their goal of elimination of all fugitive odor sources at the two plants. I will keep you apprised of future developments. Quarterly Significant Industrial Users' Compliance Status Report As part of the District's Source Control program, industrial dischargers are sampled routinely to determine their compliance status. At the end of each quarter, the District is required to evaluate its significant industrial users' (permittees) compliance status for the previous six-months. Under this system, each permittee is evaluated four times during each fiscal year. The District is required to annually publish in the local newspaper(The Register) all permittees that have been identified as being in "significant noncompliance" (SNC) when the SNC criteria were not met during any of the previous four quarters. For fiscal year 1997-98, there are potentially 28 of 442 permittees classified as being in SNC, about 6.5% of the total permittees. The new NPDES permit requires the SNC percentage to be at or less than 10%. During the past few years, the District has achieved this criterion by taking proactive enforcement actions and working with industries to solve problems before they become significant violations. In order to notify the permittees prior to the publication, a letter was sent to the SNC permittees on October 8, 1998, which provided information and the reasons for the Members of the Board of Directors Page 6 October 21, 1998 SNC determination. In addition, Source Control staff set up an all-day, walk-in meeting on October 14, 1998, to meet with the SNC permittees in order to provide an opportunity to discuss the District's determination of SNC status. After the meetings with the industries, Source Control staff will determine whether the companies can be taken off the SNC list. A final determination will be made by October 21, 1998. The SNC list is scheduled to be published October 23, 1998, in The Register. A copy of the public notice and list of SNC permittees is attached. Backloa of Capital Repairs in Orenae County is Mountina An article from the Oct. 2 edition of the Times entitled "Backlog of Capital Repairs Mounting" is included in the attachments section of this package. Page three of the article briefly mentions the District and our$1.6 billion capital improvement program. You might find it of interest that the reporter contacted us only once and that was to request a copy of our CIP budget. We provided the information as published in our 1998-99 Budget. Other than his one telephone call, the reporter requested no other information and, when offered, was not interested in interviewing any staff. Y2K Issues Attached is an article from October 1998 PM Public Management magazine entitled "Y2K: Get Your Action Plan in Order NoW' by Victor Porker. It outlines the issues and concerns that may impact everyone. Filming at Plant 2 Ed Hodges reported that Rusing Photography used Plant 2 for a photo shoot for Mercedes Benz. The filming was done in the evening on September 16 near the Rothrock Pump Station and the surge tower. Groundwater Issues Tom Dawes provided me with a copy of an article from the Contra Costa Times (attached) on the reverse osmosis project in Pleasanton, CA, which is under construction. The agency has backed away from a plan to mix the highly-treated sewer water into the drinking water supply. It plans to used this water for landscaping or other non- potable uses, and if necessary, injection into the ground. Tom also forwarded us a copy of Resolution 98-309, which was adopted by the Orange County Supervisors and the Orange County Flood Control District on Members of the Board of Directors Page 7 October 21. 1998 August 18, 1998, supporting coordination and cooperation in joint efforts to implement the Groundwater Replenishment System Project. A copy of the resolution is attached. July 21 Sewage Spill On July 21 of this year a dewatering contractor working for the SoCal Gas Company in the City of Newport Beach accidentally drilled into a District force main. The pipeline ruptured and spilled approximately 122,000 gallons of raw sewage across Pacific Coast Highway and into surface drains leading into Newport Bay between the coastline and Lido Isle. A District cleanup crew was dispatched to the scene and assisted in the removal of Boatable materials from the marina. The City of Newport Beach Police Department report on the spill lists OCSD as a suspect in the matter for failure to adequately and accurately mark the location of the force main that was hit by the drilling contractor. As an owner of underground pipelines, the District is responsible for participating in the state's Dig Alert program to ensure excavators are made aware of the location of underground structures before commencing excavation at a construction site. District management is reviewing the actions of District personnel responsible for line marking, and it appears that the actions of District staff were consistent with existing District procedures and past practices. We are continuing to look at the screening criteria used by District staff to determine when we (OCSD) should mark a pipeline, as opposed to DigAlert, in an attempt to improve our procedures to prevent a similar occurrence in the future. We expect to complete the program review and develop recommendations for improvements within the next 30 days. AB 2339. Remediation of Identified Toxic Hot Spots Attached is a copy of a letter dated September 24, 1998, from Governor Pete Wilson to members of the California Assembly, informing them that he was not signing AB No. 2339 and the reasons for his action. Leaky Sewers in Huntington Beach I have enclosed a copy of an e-mail on the problems the City of Huntington Beach is experiencing with its aging collection system. These problems are probably typical for most of the cities and agencies in our service area. Members of the Board of Directors Page 8 October 21, 1998 OCSD Tour Guide Program The OCSD Tour Guide Program is celebrating its one-year anniversary this month - and what a year it has been! Over the past 12-months, 35 OCSD employees have hosted more than 900 visitors through our wastewater treatment facility at Plant 1. These guides show the public what an excellent job we are doing by giving them a first-hand and up-close look at wastewater treatment. Our guests include a wide range of visitors such as school groups, service organizations, city public works staffs and foreign dignitaries. More than ever, the demand for our tours is increasing as people pass the word along about the interesting and well-staffed tour we offer. On this one-year anniversary of the Tour Guide Program we are taking a moment to thank the individuals who have served as guides. Our guides come from almost every different department and they have done a fabulous job of making wastewater treatment a real and understandable concept to each of our visitors. Hats off to the following individuals. Terry Ahn Blake Anderson Nick Arhontes Jeff Armstrong Denise Bell Jean Bettenhausen Jeff Brown Deon Carrico Rich Castillion Bruce Chapman Kelly Christensen Barbara Collins Matt Eddy Fawn Elizondo Penny Kyle Larry Lazorek Rose Marsella Mike McCarthy Pat McNally Kathy Millea Mike Moore Tracey Murphy Ken Sakamoto Rich Schlegel Frank Schultz Yvonne Schwab Rob Thompson George Thuro Michelle Tuchman Tony Valenzuela Bill Wallin John Weingarden Ryal Wheeler Morris Ying Paula Zeller Training for new guides is scheduled for November. Anyone from the District can serve as a tour guide provided they have their supervisor's approval. Guides are asked to host tours no more than once a month and can indicate the level of group they are most comfortable with. Tour Guide training consists of two 2-hour sessions. The feedback I've received on this program has been extremely favorable, from those taking the tours and those giving the tours. If you are interested in learning more about this program, contact Cymantha Atkinson at 714 593-7122. Members of the Board of Directors Page 9 October 21, 1998 Articles of Interest I have attached recent newspaper articles that have appeared in local publications, as well as an article from the September 1998 issue of Governing on Biomass Appeal, which you may find interesting reading. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Derail F. M re General Manager DFM:jt H WP Mr OM Hm IOLerr[ws ro*Hr eoARo 1oxeae Doc Attachments PUBLIC NOTICE In accordance with the public participation requirements of 40 CFR Part 25 in the enforcement of National Pretreatment Standards and defined by 40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(0),the Orange County Sanitation District (District)is hereby publishing the following list of industries who,during July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998, were significantly in noncompliance with permitted wastewater discharge standards. A Significant Noncompliant(SNC) industry is defined as follows: • Chronic violations of discharge limits occurring when 66%or more of all measurements exceed the discharge limits for the same pollutant. ■ Acute violations of discharge limits occurring when 33%or more of all measurements are a major violation of the discharge limits. ■ Any other violation of a discharge limit that has caused,either alone or in combination with other discharges, interference or pass through. • Any discharge of a pollutant that has caused Imminent endangerment to human health,welfare, or the environment;or has resulted in the District's exercise of Its emergency authorities. • Exceeding by 90 days or more the scheduled date of a compliance schedule milestone for attaining final compliance. • Failure to provide required reports including,but not limited to, periodic self-monitoring reports and reports with compliance schedules within 30 days of the due date. • Failure to accurately report noncompliance with discharge limits or any other requirements applicable to the user pursuant to the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance). • Any other violation or group of violations that will adversely affect the operation or implementation of the District's pretreatment program. The District has taken enforcement action against these firms. Industries listed below have implemented corrective actions and may not be in violation of wastewater discharge standards as of the date of this publication. SIGNIFICANT NONCOMPLIANT INDUSTRIES Company Permit Number City Industries with Discharge Violations Air Industries 3-1-105 Garden Grove Air Industries Corporation 3-1-013 Garden Grove All Metals Processing of O.C., Inc. 3-1-110 Stanton Anaheim 6dmsion Co., Inc. 2-1-168 Anaheim Cannon Equipment West, Inc. 3-1-152 Garden Grove Ideal Uniform Rental Service 2-1-395 Garden Grove John A.Thomas 3-1-065 Huntington Beach Key Circuit Co. 3-1-079 Fountain Valley Killingswodh Oil Co. 11-1-016 Huntington Beach Precious Metals Plating 1-1-265 Santa Ana Solder Station One#4 1-1-015 Santa Ana South Bay Chrome/Chrome Effects 1-1-044 Santa Ana Spiveco, Inc. 2-1-046 Anaheim Triple A Containers, Inc. 3-1-019 Buena Park Industries with Reporting Violations Expo Dyeing and Finishing Inc. 3-1-322 Anaheim Independent Forge 2-1-401 Orange Kenlen Specialties, Inc. 2-1-171 Fountain Valley Omni Metal Finishing, Inc. 2-1-520 Fountain Valley Santana Services 2-1-016 Fullerton Sensolron, Inc. 11-1-011 Huntington Beach Solder Dynamics 1-1-295 Santa Ana Spectrum Yams Inc. 2-1-179 Anaheim Techplate Engineering Co., Inc. 2-1-082 Anaheim Industries with Discharge and Reporting Violations J.R.O. Operations Trust 11-1-017 Huntington Beach South Coast Oil Co. 11-1-019 Los Angeles Super Circuits 1-1-045 Santa Ana Ultra Wheel Company 3-1-074 Buena Park C:Vemp1.SNC for Board Leaer.dw i Y2KE Get Your Action Plan in Order Now Victor Porlier oes anyone know for sure how Y2K issues will play out on January 1, 2000? No, of course not. But we have had a spectacular demon- stration of the disruptive power of just a few little microchips. When the Galaxy 4 satellite acted up this past May,Amer- ica's 50 million pagers and other telecommunications de- vices couldn't function. This skip in our technological heartbeat gave us a warning and a preview of things to come. As noted in the June 8, 1998, issue of U.S. News and World Report, "One uncorrected module is like a burned- out bulb in a string of cheap Christmas lights: the whole string goes down." The point is, Y2K issues are not abstractions, exercises of interest only to computer geeks. "Y2K" stands for a host of 9 technological functions, from the workings of traffic lights and ATMs to the availability of emergency ambulance ser- vices and clean drinking water. What we are discussing here is the whole elaborate, interconnected, wired world at the local, state, national,and international levels. We know that some parts of the many vast computer net- Victor Farber will 6e works will become inoperative on January 1, 2000, because port of a panel discus- some date-sensitive microchips and software codes will lion on Y2K at lCWs conf�"crash" or malfunction. There are measures that must be Florida, in Orlando. Florida, on Monday, taken to forestall widespread systems failure. And there are October 26. PUBLIC MANAGEMEW 17 things that individual citizens need to their complacency,reporters appear not 4) electronic data interchanges (EDIs), know for their own protection. As of yet to have been in touch with the peo- and 5)structural interdependencies. October 1,we will have just 15 months ple who are actually doing the fixing be- left to get the word out and am cause the remediators are definitely not Legacy software applications on Unfortunately, business and news- offering ressamrances. mainframes. In the 1960s and 1970s, weeklies,as well as the daily newspapers Perhaps some reporters have been software was written mainly in some 40 have provided only occasional bits and talking with the CEOs, ClO1, and Y2K dialects of COBOL and in another 400- pieces about Y2K.And TV coverage, to managers of major corporations about plus computer languages.Over time,as data with occasional exceptions by C- the Y2K sum of their companies.If so, computer mainframe platforms im- SPAN,CBN,and CNN,has been almost nine will get you ten,they have gotten a proved in speed, storage capacity, and nonexistent. This is both amazing and very may picture. Corporate executives other features,other software languages irresponsible. Amazing because there is and public relations folk are skilled at were developed. Changes in software a tremendous story in the making, and papering over any corporate problems. were put in piecemeal,with old and new irresponsible bemuse the public trusts Again,this would be a case of reporters computer languages patched together. the media to deliver news of impor- talking to the wrong people. The result was computer systems that tance. Only slowly has more attention The apparently unstoppable bull haw millions of lines of code, often in a begun to be paid to Y2K. market on Wall Street may be one of the mix of computer languages.It takes an av- People have come to expect that the factors that have been lulling our media errge of 18 to 36 months to assess,reme- media will broadcast warnings of hum- to sleep.Good news fuels optimism,not duce,rest,and successfully implement the canes,floods,tornadoes,and forest fires. just in the general population but overhaul of a major computer system. Well, if there are sparse warnings about among pundits as well. It plays into our The bigger the system or duster of sys- Y2K issues, there's little problem, right? national penchant for optimism and tems,the longer it takes to fir The Social Only a few mild warnings have area the happy endings.Why rock the boat with Security Administration has been at it for light of print or been heard on the air. dire predictions of a Y2K disaster of seven years and now is only on the verge waves. If anything, the public has been whatever magnitude? of completion.There still is cause for con- lulled into believing that everything is Tben,too,the media apparently don't cent bemuse, as esuoned programmers under control. 'They'—the experts— have a very high opinion of the intelli- point out,when you are 90 percent done, will take care of everything. gence of their readers,listener,or view- the remaining 10 percent usually takes This dereliction on the par of the ers. And the Y2K story is complicated. twice to three times longer to finish than media stems in par from the monolithic Very complicated, as will be discussed planned.And sometimes even longer. nature of news organizations. A few later. The subject doesn't lend itself to Historically speaking, fewer than 20 leading newspapers and TV networks the kind of glitzy journalism we have percent of such major efforts are finished located in New York Gty call the shots been exposed to in recent months and on schedule. Given the fact that far less for the whole country.They haven't yet years. Y2K can't compete with O.J•, than two years time remains,any corpo- taken Y2K very seriously,so no one else Diana,or Monim for headlines.But Y2K rations or government agencies that have has either,and the story--other than in issues are as real as the rent,and they will not yet finished inventory and assess- disconnected bits—just isnt getting out haw a direct, personal effect on all the ment and begun recoding any such large with sufficient vigor.Belatedly, the New people in this country.So it behooves the legacy systems are unlikely to make the York Tama ran an editorial on August 2 media to set aside their preference for the deadline, even if skilled technicians can that took Y2K seriously, saying that it trivial and the garish and to get on with be found to do the job.Remediation is a would be wise"to prepare for the worst" genuine reporting of vital Y2K informs- laborious, step-by-step effort that re- How do we account for the medu's tion. Instead of washing their hands of quires that milestones be dealt with in apparent, entrenched resistance to Y2K bemuse it is hard to tackle, media sequence. As the deadline nears, such opening up and examining Y2K issues? people should use their skills to help citi- work resists acceleration, even if extra Some reporters may believe that they was understand what's involved. hands can be found to be put on the job. have checked out the story. But even if they have talked with a cutting-edge Five Major Concerns Desktop Pc applications. The chal- computer genius,they haven't necessar- lenge of Y2K remediation is somewhat By talked to the right person. People Y2K discussions depend on what part of less daunting when it comes to desktops who are in the vanguard of computer the problem you are talking about.There than it is for mainframe computers. development seldom concern them• are five separate but interactingaspects to While desktop Mau have no hardware selves with anything in the put. Berne- be considered 1) legacy systems,2) PCs problem, their applications may have. diction lacks sex appeal. Judging by and networks, 3) embedded microchips, Desktop PCs purchased before 1997 al- 18 OROBER 1998 f W most ce ave rtainly h hardware problems hat was a Compliance means that all of a utility's in their BIOS, CMOS, and RTC chips, systems (hardware, software, and and a sizable percentage of PCs put- technical and firmwam)haw been deep-tested for ad- chased since then have problems as well. ministrative management, electrical Vendors of such Computers,as well as management issue now generation, and transmission. Corpo- sellers of Commercial off-the-shelf oper- is one of public safety rate suppliers to the utilities that pro- ating systems and software applications, - duce,refine.and transport the essential have not been sufficiently forthcoming and quality of life. fuels (coal, petroleum, natural gas, and about the Y2K compliance of their prod- others)and replacement parts also must tuts.After a long period of denying that be independently certified as Y2K-Com- it had problems, Microsoft finally ac- system.just as the cells of a human body pliant. Because failure in one part of the knowledged Y2K glitches in more than share a common bloodstream,so com- grid can quickly ripple through to other 20 of its various software products last purer systems share a Common "bit- parts, a fully compliant utility system spring.Newer networked PCs,minicom- stream." Non-Y2K-compliant data are must have firewalls that will protect it puters, and varied client-server systems like viruses moving in the electronic bit- from any Y2K failures in neighboring are not as extensively vulnerable as older stream. They an Corrupt every system utilities on the common grid. mainframe legacy systems, but they re- they are able to enter. The vulnerability of businesses to quire careful assessment nevertheless. Such untested,unprotected data inter- supply chains for Critical goods an be il- The hardware,software,and data files all Changes an be destructive,if not deadly. lusuated by this summer's GM strike at a need assessment. Customized applies- An organization must ensure that all data metal stamping plant, which closed [ions require careful analysis. Many will exchanges, whether made electronically many plants and factories and signifi- need upgrades,repairs,or replacement. or by tape or disk mediums, have been cantly reduced production of trucks and fully assessed and made compliant Oth- cars.In 1996,a walkout at Dayton,Ohio, Embedded microchips. There are an erwise, the unprotected Compliant sys- brake plants led to nearly total closure of. estimated 25 to 40 billion microchips term may become infected and Crash.Ali GM manufacturing in North America. (firmware) in use worldwide. Mi- remediation efforts will have Come to Industry Wak magazine says, "With crochips Control all manner of military, nothing.These electronic interfaces are a today's just-in-time mind-set, the im- commercial, governmental, and per- particular problem for police and sheriff pact of Year 2000-caused interruptions sonal electromechanical devices. Of the departments.They exchange data with a to business would be catastrophic. total, about 1 to 5 percent are likely to wide array of other police or enforcement Should a shop-floor systems snafu be al- have date-sensitive functions that will entities not only within their home state lowed to go undetected Until its too late, cause Y2K problems. but with other states,the federal govern- not only is the Company that Caused the Up to 500 million chips most be ment,foreign counties,and Interpol. trouble at risk but so are its dependent found, tested,and reprogrammed or re- business partners." placed.This is proving to be a daunting Structural interdependencies.While As more and more organizations process.While there are many Common- such electronic data interdependencies have become aware of the potential im- alties in the microchip elements in build- are critical, of even greater concern are pact of Y2K,more and more attention is ings (HVAC, security, etc) and office dependencies on the Critical Lnftastruc- being paid to risk assessment contin- equipment (faxes, postage meters, etc.), cores that provide electricity,fuel, water, genry planning, disaster recovery, and every industrial sector has it own unique food, telecommunications, tramporta- potential litigation. Wse managers are technology equipment and processes to tion,and financial transactions. asking for the development of probable be analyzed. The health care industry is Of these,no dependency is more cru- worst-case scenarios to determine which only one of many fields having serious cial to our national and economic sur- measures for continuity of services and embedded-chip issues, and the percent- viva[than that on electricity.The United business survivability should be in place age of faulty chips in that industry is States is currently served by an interde- well before the end of 1999. proving In be much higher than average. pendent grid of 9,0D0 public and private The response to Y2K issues on the in- enterprises that generate and/or distribute temational, federal, and major cmpo- Electrea is debt h bendsanges(EDIs). electricity.Some still are in the process of rate levels has been tardy indeed It now Even if the entire computer-system writing request for proposals. Others is clear that we are in for some nasty mr- complex of an organization is internally have been working on remediation for a bulence in the early weeks and months Y2K-compliant in its hardware, soft- long time, yet the author knows of not of the year 2000,if not sooner.Last June, ware, and firmware, it is vulnerable one electric utility that is Y2K-compliant our federal agencies earned an overall F whenever it interfaces with an outside Independent certification of Y2K grade from Congressman Stephen PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 19 Horn, whose House subcommittee has gious groups should do all they can to electronic funds transfers to thew banks, the oversight function for the federal build awareness and urge action. There including Social Security, pension, dis- governmenes Y2K efforts. The progress are 85,000 political jurisdictions below ability, and unemployment drecks. All being made at the state level is dis- the federal level.Most localities are fur- these are at risk What should a city or turbingly uneven as well. ther behind than the federal government county be prepared to do if such checks Nor are shareholders getting a picture or the states. Gary Gwyn, city manager are delayed for up to six weeks? of the true rote of affairs in the cmpon- of Grand Prairie,Texas,and president of Public managers who have not yet tiom in which we invest, for which we ICMA, reports that more than half of begun a Y2K process should move work, and upon which we depend. Americas 36,000 cities have not yet sat quickly to launch one.If you are among Thankfully, the SEC is now requiring down and seriously reflected on Y2K. these managers, here are some crucial quarterly Y2K progress reports. As of Gwyn calls such behavior by the re- steps you should take. March 1998,some 80 of the Fortune 250 sponsible elected and appointed officials had yet to finish even the assessment "naive"Such officials are apparently un- Ensure that the elected officials to phase of the process. Fortunately, major aware of the tort, contractual, and inn- whom you report, as well as your money-center banks and others are much stimtional grounds upon which they management team, understand the further along and have not durmssed Y2K and their jurisdictions would be legally challenges and are fully committed to as overblown hype.This is dear from the liable for the Y2K disasters that would remediation. fact that Chase and Citibank have bud- result from the disruption of critical Form an oversight committee of geted$300 and$650 million,respectively; government services and functions. stakeholders. (This is not simply an for remediation. The very fabric of our There is a wide array of tools and lists information technology function.) economy depends upon the functioning both for businesses and for government Appoint a single project leaderIca r- ef our banks, brokerages, and insurance to use in approaching the problem.In ad- dinator,and give that person both the companies. And they depend upon an dition m the now-standard steps of in- responsibility and the authority to uncrumpted electronic bitstxam. vemory,assessment,semediation,testing, move the organization toward timely and implementation,serious attention to compliance. Talk to this coordinator The Local Response disaster recoveryscenarios is essential. daily. Given the current status of the elec- Conduct a comprehensive inventory The intensity,duration,and location(s)of tric utility industry,communities should of all hardware, software, and the coming turbulence will be significantly consider the experience of Montreal and firmware m use in every department. affected by what is done in our local cam- our Northeast during the ice storm last Identify every vendor, supplier, and munities.Communities would be well ad- winter,which led to power outages of up intergovernmental partner,and deter- vised to pool their thinking as individuals, to six weeks.If an electronic data storm mine all the dependencies involved. professionals,businesspeople,and elected left your community without electric and appointed officials and plan for the power for six weeks or subject to rolling W.Michael Fletdher,in his book Com- challenges ahead The local media should brown outs and many if not all of your purer Crisis 20M which is especially valu- be encouraged to create full-time Y2K surrounding communities were in the able for small and medium-sized orgam- beats from now until 2000. same boat, what plans and supplies rations,outlines three key questions that Characteristically,small and medium- should you have in place? most be asked of each system and process sized businesses and government entities Elaine Fluke, a Tucson Y2K consul- once an inventory has been done. do not have a great many large and inter- tant to small towns addresses such addi- connected systems. Consequently, they tional concerns = loss of oamral gas, 1. Is this system critical?Could your or- still have time to find most, if not all,of phones,911 service,water supply,treat- ganization operate its essential four. their problems and fix them over the m- ment and disposal systems, police and tions if this system disappeared for a maining months. fire protection and emergency medical week or a month? The problem has broad implications responses,as well as local bank closures, • Do I have the manpower,in-house for the future profitability and survival of ATM failures.and failures ofjust-in-time or outside, to do the job in the businesses, their ability to provide the transportation systems for food and fuel. time available? goods and services essential to other orga- She asks,"If local resort are b equipped • Do 1 have the manpower,in-house nations and to generate the tax revenue to handle any of these emergencies,then or outside,to do a manual process streams upon which governments and how will the town be prepared to handle for a while after January 1,2000? municipal bondholders are dependent the hundreds or thousands of additional 2. What is my best choice among these Local chambers of commerce,service people in the area,were such a disaster to options repairing, replacing,and m- dubs, fraternal orgarsizatiom, and tell- hit?" Many citizens are dependent upon tiring this process? 20 Ocroaea 1996 G 3. Does the time available mean that Develop a three-part community- issue, the magazines editor wrote•. "We one or more of these choices is prob- tion plan to usein (1) informing confess m having underestimated the Year ably unworkable all of your managers and employ- 2000 problem when presented with an ar- ees about the problem, what you tide four years ago.We also felt that it was Every organization needs to outline intend to do,and what their con- a minor technical glitch that would be a project schedule with "SMARTS": tnbutions most be;(2) Contacting fixed long before the year 2000. We were Specific objectives and components your vendors,suppliers, partners, wrong: the Year 2000 problem (or Y2K) Measurable interim and final results• and other government programs was more serious than we thought" Agreed to by all stakebolders.Realistic to ensure mutual support and Ideally, everyone who has tnderesti- in light of time, resources, and work compliance;and(3) meeting with mated its seriousness also will come to this quality. Time framed by the project's the citizens and leaders of your understanding and will act accordingly in deadlines. Steps sequenced so that community organizations. his or her community.What was a tec nd- progress and slippages can be carefully Seek programmer volunteers from Cal and management issue now is one of I monitored.And,without fail,develop among the communitys retirees, public safetyand qualityof life. MM disaster recovery and litigation protec- businesspeople, and college stu- tive plans as part of the project for the dents, when funds and skills are Vtr Porker is eucntive director of the scenarios deemed probable.Design as in short supply. Curter for Civic Renewai,lnt,with offices many of the tests for your testing in Manhattan and Albany, New York phase as possible before you begin The World Future Society publishes Porkers weekly Wednesday Internet Cal- your remediation. Remember, this is 71wRouristinordertoanalyzesignificant man, 'Digital States b Association "con an exercise in the assessment and social and technological trends and to be accessed at www.y2ktimebamb.com. management of risk. offer informed forecasts In the May 1998 His e-mail address is rcrenewal@aaLrom. CEm l � ICMA Annual Conference in Orlando, Radda Oct. 24-28, 1998 •Cheek your a-mail' •Streamline procummeirt with electronic commerce •Surf the Net •Network with local government peers24aam firm •Explore Y2K solutions their technology innovations •Demo public safety applications •and more! p ' 'Please OdnP your POSIotOca server name,accourd retire and pamwortl to me e-mall In TechCiry. �.� Cosponsors: TechCity 2000 is **'/*�� w2 ^ . hmuphi to you By ®`YMA ,-Wl�Focoar. 4 PUBLIC MANAGEMENT 21 Sep. 1%. ;M 2:0I'M E dCE a 9Ei E No. 6217 .. . . Argo, David G, (Dave) From: Lopez. Dan C QS V-Concord To: Crook. James(Jim);Henoerson, Ronald E. ;Ron) Cc: Arrggo, David G. (Dave) Subject: DSfiSD Clean Water Revival Date: Friday, September If. 19987:55AM Priority: High Bad News for the MF/AO Project. The following arti:le is from the Contra Costa Tames Published an September 11. 1998 Recycled water plan gets dumped Opposition over health risks raised by Tn-Valley residents sways services district to tnd other uses for treated source than dninWng By Lim Vorderbrueggan TIMES STAFF WRITER Tne Dublin San Ramon Services District plan to put purified milet water into :he drinking water supply is dead—at least tot now. Responding to heavy public opposition,the district.backed away Thursday from a plan to mix high)l treated sewer water into the drinking supply for Dubitn, Liva:mo•e and Pleasanton. 'The community is not comfortable with injector into the ground-water oasin.'said district general manager Robert Beebe. "We need to find a good rtrgalion a surboe use tur what I minx is high-quality water." The district is not abandoning as reverse osmosis pro,ect and will commie construction of as$21 million facility In Pleasanton. But the purified sewer water will be used for landscaomg or other nonpotable uses,according to the terms of a memorandum of understanding the boa•d ratified Thursday night. The district does not promise a will never Inject the water into the ground, however. If the district fnos Itself with too much waste water and nowhere for It to gc. It may still have to pump it into the ground-water table,Beebe said. "I don believe that will happen, but the water utilises in this valley will have to help us find other uses for this water,°Beebe saki. The accord--which also cans for a public education program, unfettered access by Zone 7 water district to the plant and a liability ciause—goes to the agency Tuesday. It both the agency and:he distinct sign a,the deal will be sem to the Regional Waver Quality Control Board, which has indicated it will make the fine decision In October. This is good news for angry residents who called the water Mend urappatizing at best and.at worst a ponenual health Oak from unknown substances or matfunctions at the plant. -This is a positive 0"013menL-as forg as tr.e Junlfled waste water stays Out of the ground, said Geoff Cooper,chairman tr!he Safe Water Committee,a page t Sep, 14. 1995 ^:92PM sLdCb d 'r=d? n No. U17 P. 3i3 citizens group that led opposition to the district's plans.—rho district now should go ahead with an extensive testing program.' Despite more than two years of hearings and the state Department of Heahh Service's seal of approval,the dlsthct.'s case for pumping treated sewer water imo the aquifer began unraveling early this year. In March,the National Research Cour ll found that while using reclaimed water In me nation's drinking supply was generally safe,it recommended more testing and urged to use"only as a last resort." The Safe Water Committee followed with a study in May. calling the project dangerous. But the turning point dame Tuesday night in P-easanton.After five hours of acrimonious lestimory,the City Council asked the district to keep the pun led water out of the city's drinking water supply. The most obvious use is irrigation,but a is not as simple as it sounds. Grass and grapes need water In the summer,but sewage knows no season. The district has no more room In the regional sewer pipeline to accommodate the thousands of new homes and businesses headed its way. "We have to have a wayto dispose of effluent during the ralny winter months." sate Dave Requa, engineer tot clean Water Revival, the time of the district's recycled water project The district is already so dose to as pipeline limit that it had to dump 60 million gallons of waste water into its sludge ponds during last wiener's heavy rains. One Possibility ism pumo the water into a section of the aquifer and pull it back out in the same year for irrigation,Reque said.The water would not mix with drinking water because it wouldn't be in the ground long enough. The Dublin district is not alone In Its struggle with public distaste for purified toilet water. San Diego is launching a S2 milion public relations campaign in an effort to convince its residents to drink recycled sewer water. San Diego plans to put highly treated waste water into a drinking water reservoir.It would be the first project of its kind In California and the second in me nation. 'if you get a group of people with cpen minds and we explain how it works and how safe it is,they are in favor of the pmject;sald Ran Kole, public affairs di'ector for San Diego's waste-water department.'But there is a vocal minority in the community that has said they don't want it," Edition,CCT, Section:A. Page. 6 Page 2 San Diego May Flush Now, Drink Later By STAcv x vers aioff Repener of Tur w.�.�srxe,,uovxx,�. a r r The city of San Diego doesn't have enough water for its thirsty population.But How do you sell a city on drinking its own sewage watef7 San Diego is preparing an It has come up with a solution:repurifying elaborate PA campaign that compares water molecules to tennis balls passing snugly sewage intolit has drinking water. through afilter's holes. On the slime scale,the campaign says: Now all it has to doffs persuade the tic to a plan that some have dubbed bed "toilet to lap." � It's repulsive,"e says Ryan Goulding, nd it electronics store that es associre that desperate esp rate I!r/ fl hard to believe that we're that desperate for water." In a bid to overcome such revulsion,San A virus Is like a semi... And a bacterium Is like a pyramid Diego is embarking on a high-profile mar keting campaign. Even before it has started building the waste-water recycling San Diego's population has leveled But It continues to consume more plant,the city already has spent more than off,,, water $2 million to hire a public-relations firm, population in millions Average deny consumption In millions of gallons conduct public outreach meetings and set up briefing sessions and hot lines. 134 rog City officials are hoping that a sober ! presentation of the scientific evidence will 121 Igo I ! help assuage public fears about the pro- ject's safety and feasibility. They have ! commissioned a report from an indepen. t'is 'ro dent group of scientists, due next week. Ila 1i0 that is expected to endorse the plan. As other cities find themselves in semi. ! lar dehydrated straits, they are looking to tte ! IW San Diego as a possible model for water INI n W .1 •Is In= W W x Ye reuse.Thecity's wastewater management Sam:cayors,n aWa w,i..uowr department has already gotten calls from municipalities in Australia. Hong Kong and Japan. Diego has consistently exceeded its alloca. Diego plans to use what is known pop amulti- But Howard Wayne,a San Diego assem. lion of water from the Colorado.But other pie-barrier method. This would first filter blyman, is concerned that the program cities are now using up their allucaliuns, mnlamtnanttout of waste water as it passed could create an image problem for the city. putting pressure on San Diego to come up through tiny membranes,and then remove "Do you want to mine to San Francisco and with other options. minerals and more pollutants through a see the Golden Cate,or do you want to go to After years of negotiations, it recently form of filtration called reverse osmosis. San Diego and drink sewage?"he says."It reached agreement to import water from The water would be treated with soften. will make it hard for San Diego to compete." California's Imperial Valley. The city has ers,disinfected with ozone and then placed The city may not have much choice.Its also undertaken some rationing efforts. A in an open reservoir where it would blend eucalyptus-shaded beachfront facade be. city ordinance, for example. requires all with raw water from runoff and imported lies the fact that the city basically sits in a' properties that are sold to be retrofitted sources.The water would then sit for more desert. It now imports 9g9 of the water it with Iow-flush toilets.And some reclaimed than a year to provide an additional mea. uses, mainly from the Colorado River and water is already available for lawns,but is sure of safety.The idea is that if any of the stale aqueducts. As its population has not drinkable. filtration measures failed. impurities grown—it Is currently at 1.2 million—San To turn sewage into drinking water.San please Turn to Pape B8.Column I �, ppj ,I���f��E,�,�11�Cd/ AI XT 900k U THURSDAY. SEPTEMBER 111, 1998 San Diego May Recyle Its Water Continued From Page BI would be detected long before the water of cost,as well as safety.The S150 million was wed.Then lhewaterwould bepurlried price tag would over construction, with a final time before reacting the tap. operation and maintenance projected at£9 Repurification isn't completely new:M million a year.Still, repurification is con- Paso, Texas, and Orange County, Calif.. siderably feu expensive than the alterna- both have repurificabon facilities. But live, desalination—taking the salt out of . ratherthanusingopenreservoirs,theyuse sea water—which Mr. Schlesinger says a method called groundwater injection. costs two to four times as much. Purified sewage water is injected into an And the project does have some sup- underground layer of porous rock and porters. Including environmental groups sand, which filters the water before It is such as the Sierra Club and the Surfrider withdrawn and filtered again for drinking. Foundation. They support reuse, rather People involved with these facilities don't than dumping treated sewage into the recall them generating public opposition, ocean,which is the current practice.The or even garnering much attention. county health department is also on board, "That's where the public has gotten but the city council has yet to give Its final their hair on fire—when you put it under- vote. ground when no one can see it they don't Overcoming public perceptions about mind,but when you put it in a large visible drinking purified sewage is the hard part, reservoir, it agitates people," says Dave city officials acknowledge. "If you can Schlesinger,director of San Diego's Metro spend an how with these people.they over- politan Wastewater Department. whelmingly accept the project,"says Mr. The only recycling facility in the nation Schlesinger. "The question is, can we that currently has a system simllar to that reach two million people?" proposed for San Diego is one in Northern In an effort to do so,the public relations Virginia that serves about one million peo- firm hired by the city,Ratz&Associates, ple.it was built more than 20 years ago,at has created a page of cartoon renderings a time when the local water supply was designed to explain the filtration process in heavily polluted.Millard Robbins,head of uncomplicated terms.The drawings show the area sewage authority, recalls public that If a water molecule were the size of a support for the project. tennis bell, it would fit through a tiny That isn't necessarily the rase in San cross-hatched membrane used for reverse Diego."I don't know what they could possi- osmosis.The cartoon shows that in corre- bly do to make it clean enough," says sponding dimensions,a virus would be the Chandelle Jackson, having coffee in front size of a semi-truck,bacteria the size of a of a local Starbucks. "I wouldn't trust the. pyramid and protozoa the size of a volcano, city government to do It right."adds David thus unable to penetrate the membrane Carr,a San Diego resident with tennis-ball-sized openings. The project is being opposed on grounds Mr.Schlesinger says the city has other plans to "saturate the public" with scien- tists'reports and other environmental doc- uments,placing them in libraries and on the Internet. The city council will also be reviewing the reports and holding hear. ings,and could give the project its final go- ahead in about a year. The waste-water management depart- ment could begin construction of pipelines and treatment facilities as early as Febru. ary 2001 with a target of September=for delivery to the tap. At least some residents say they will be waling to turn on the tap for a drink."The notion's a littierepulsive,but I tout the en- gineers.That's what nature does to water anyway,"says Mike Boyle,a construction lawyer. "Who knows,"says Melody Romero,a loan processor, "it could be cleaner than the cop water is now." 5 P 24 '98 _1:06AM PLAN.& DES. SER` :CES P.21'4 1 SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE r`f. 4 4/_�,_'°� AND THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OFF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ry August 18, 1998 a i On motion of Supervisor Steiner, duly Seconded and carried,the following Resolution was G adopted: 6 WHEREAS,the County of Orange has an adopted General Plan which includes a Resources 7 Element Water Component identifying water sources and utilization in the County; and g WHEREAS, this Board of Supervisors has farmed the Orange County Water Task Force to advise this Board on water matters affecting Orange Counfy; and 9 10 WHEREAS,the State of California, has,at times, experienced severe droughts that impact the financial and environmental character of urban and Waal communities alike; and I I WHEREAS, recycled water is defined as water which,as a result of treatment of wastewater, is 12 suitable for an indirect beneficial use or a controlled use that would not otherwise occur; and 13 WHEREAS,the future need for adequate,reliable and high quality water supplies for South= 14 California can only be met by using every available source for water, including recycled water and flood and storm waters; and to WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District are 16 planning a major water recycling project (the Groundwater Replenishment System Project)to percolate the highly purified recyled water into the groundwater basin along the Santa Ana River as a 17 supplemental additional source of water to reduce demands on imported water supplies; and 1g WHEREAS, the Groundwater Replenishment System Project will require use of flange County 19 Flood Control District right-of-way for the conveyance of the water to the Santa Ana River. and 20 WHEREAS, the purposes of the Orange Comity Flood Control District include providing for the control of the flood and storm waters of the district and the conservation of those waters for beneficial 21 and useful purposes within or without the district;and 22 WHEREAS,recycled water is a regional benefit in that it is a dependable supply,not subject to 23 drought or seasonal disparities;and 24 WHEREAS,the Orange County Task Force has recommended at its meeting of June 18. 1998 to support coordination and cooperation in joint efforts to implement the Groundwater Replenishment 2c _ System Project by the County of Orange,the Orange County Flood Control District. the Orange County 26 Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District. 27 'Resolution No. 98-309 Supporting groundwater Replenish- 28 ment System Project DPT:ep t 24 '98 11:06RM PLANA DEV, SEP.VXES P.3i4 I NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of Supervisors.also acting as the Board of the Orange County Flood Control District, hereby reiterates its support for water 2 reclamation and recycling projects and directs its departments and staff to coordinate work efforts on the Groundwater Replenishmem System Project with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District when compatible with Flood Control District purposes and uses. 4 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Orange County Hoard of Supervisors. also acting as the I 5 Board of the Orange County Flood Control District, further direct&its departments and staff to cooperate with the Orange County Sanitation District and the Orange County Water District by agreeing to 6 exchange real property entitlement rights or allow each of the agencies to use its right-of-way as 7 mutually agreed upon such as the exchange of storage capacity and easement rights on Santiago Creek in exchange for easement rights on the Santa Ana River. 8 , I 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEP 24 '99 C+07PN PLAN.& DEV. SERV.CES P.4/4 The foregoing was passed and adopted by the tollewing vote of the Orange County Board of Supervisors on August 19, 1998, to wit: AYES: Supervisors: WILL/AM G. STEINER, TODD SPITZER, CHARLES V. SMI^H THOMAS W. WILSON, SAKES W. SILVA NOES: EXCUSED; ABSTAINED: CHAIRMAN, Orange County Board of Supervisors STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) as: COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, DARLENE J. BLOOM, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, Califomia, nereby certify that a copy of this document has been dellvered to the Chairman of the Board and that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the Orange County Board of Supervisors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and seal. Al 082511998 At An Ir Date DARLENEj.ULUUM Clerk of BR Board of SuperviaoR 17 County Or Orange,State of dllfomla Resolution No:99.309 Agoras Oaf¢. 0811811998 Item No. 1s AE I awcfy datdrafcaadrp Is a tue and c Dopy orthn EML Raeeuaen UWAd by ab Beard of SupeMwb. Drape coafty,Sub of aalMome. DARLENE J.BLOOM,Clerk d Ms Board d Suesvaan By Depub N V I R O N M E N T 6 TOM ARRANOAH Biomass Appeal WHEN THEY BUILT their solar- the town limits.With no central sewers in the town,Burton's Bated house 15 years ago, some 6,800 residents all rely on septic tanks to handle human wastes. "ends of mine installed a Clivus That's hardly a fail-safe mechanism for protecting public health Multnun,a Swedish-built compost- and preventing groundwater contamination,and residue must g toilet system.it's essentially an be pumped out from time to time and sent to somebody else's elaborate indoor outhouse,and after sewage treatment plant.Still,Buxton dwellers obviously prefer ve years, natural decomposition not to accept the treated sludge from Portland and other larger begun producing a useful,fully population centers that would arrive in exchange. organic byproduct. Since then, -It does smell bad,and most people don't realize that it's they ire been spreading the residue regulated,"notes David Wright,Maine's sludge and residuals to fertilize their fruit trees,but not licensing division chief.In fact.the U.S.Environmental Pro- � - their vegetable garden.Neighbors tection Agency sets standards for how sludge must be processed I seem n odors walling from a rooftop vent. before its burned or deposited.Sludge most be composted at I Not many Americans are that committed to an organic 128 degrees Fahrenheit for at least three days to kill any dis- IifesNle.Nor are they generally aware that communities across ease-causing organisms.EPA is now working on standards to the country have been musing human wastes on a grander scale make sure that sludge laced with dioxins,radioactive particles for the past couple of decades.Its not something politicians or other dangerous contaminants won't wind up polluting the clamor to claim credit for,but converting sewage treatment countryside. plant sludge into fertilizer may well be governments most Sue. In all probability,some purists will never be convinced that cessful recycling program sludge regulations are adequate.This year,they conducted a After processing row sewage in compliance with federal vehement Internet campaign that forced the U.S.Department water quality regulations,the country's 15,000 sewage treat- of Agriculture to back off from proposed standards that would ment plants now produce nearly 7 million tons of leftover have allowed producers to label crops fertilized with sludge as sludge every year.Some gets incinerated or handed off to land- organically grown foodstuffs.That position's defensible;Con- fills.but communities in most states have been more inventive Somers have a right to assess for themselves how the foods they than that about handling solid sewage residues. Around the country,treatment plants now -. .. disposeof54permntoftheirsludgeby spread- (converting sewage treatment ing it on the land. Sludge augments soils on rural croplands,forests and grazing land.its plant sludge Into fertilizer may also applied to urban golf courses and parks and is used to rehabilitate abandoned strip well be governments most mines and construction sites.Municipal wacle- %ater agencies usually are happy to simply ship successful recycling program. processed sludge to farmers for fiee.But some communities dry, compost and otherwise `_ ^__..- —._ _. ___. __ process sludge and market it as organic fertilizer.Seattle sells a eat are cultivated But they also ought to keep in mind that con- sludge product called Silvigro for cropland and timberland. verting the wastes they produce themselves to productive use Denver markets it as Metrogm;Salem,Oregon,as Biogm;Mil- remains a sensible proposition. seaukee as Agro-Life;and Virginia Beach,Virginia as Nutri- If anything,governments and sewage treatment plant oper- Green. atom need to be even more creative about reassuring the pub Fancy labels aren't enough to overcome some communities he that recycling sludge is safe as well as practical.Outside Seat- distaste for depositing sludge in their neighborhoods.howevm tie,the King County Water Pollution Control Department has Texas and Arizona residents are upset that New York City worked successfully with logging companies,environmentalists exports sewage wastes for fertilizing agricultural lands in those and Washington state forest managers to use sewage residues to states.Farmers in Gooddand County,Virginia have been fer. stimulate timber growth.Since"sewage"and"sludge"aren't i tilizing with sludge for 20 years, but protesting neighbors especially pleasant ward,wastewater operators around the jammed the board of supervisors meeting room in June and country have begun calling the product"biomass." persuaded officials to ban the practice.Supervisor M.R.Buder For the first time,that tern is listed in the latest edition of i says the board concluded that the odor that sludge-covered Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionmy.Sludge by my name field give off amounts to a public nuisance for other residents. won't exactly smell sweet,but governments also shouldn'tapol- Small-town prejudice against big-city dwellers is clearly at ogize for reming it back into the natural cycle oflife.Taking all .york This summer,the people of Buxton,Maine,voted 852- environmental impacts into account,the best thing govern- 659 to uphold an omhrance that bans spreading sludge within merits can do with human waste a to reuse it w a resource. Ill 70 GOVERN ING September IRKS BiBNMrIAMPAPh a 18/81/98 12:11:89 -> 71496211356 Donald McIntyre Peyc HH2 OCT-01-98 THU 10:05 P. 02 GOVERN?& 2ET 19WILSON To the Members of the California Assembly: I am returning Assembly Bill No.2339 without my signature. This bill would extend mordmtdng and surveillance activities for the State Water Resources Control Boards(SWRCB)Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program(BPTCP)and would require the SWRCB and coastal Regional Water Quality Control Boards(RWCQB)to implement a consolidated,statewide cleanup plan in immediate identified roue hot spots. The bill would also exempt dischargers from the requirements ofthe BPTCP cleanup plan if they are remedianng or contributing to the cost of remediating these sites under other specified federal or state regulatory programs. AB 2239 represents a step backwards in the BPTCP. Dischargers would be excused from being required to meet adopted water control standards if they participate or contribute in any way in mother specified remediation plait. Those provisions are extremely bound,and could be used to let the biggest polluters off the hook for soaking only the slightest contribution to the cleanup effort. Requiring those dischargers to accept additional cleanup responsibilities would require the approval of the Site Designation Committee,a body neared to settle issues of jurisdiction,not compliance. Finally,the provision of this bill that call for implementation of the final plan"with all delibetate speed'could be interpreted m force inmrediam implementation The existing process requires the plan to include findings and recommendations for the establishment of a toxic hot spot program(Water Codc section 13394(i)). The purpose of this provision is to allow all affected stakeholders,including the public,the opportunity to review and evaluate every aspect of the completed plan,including scope, feasibility,and cross(including potential for recover of costs). To call for the implementation of a plan that has not been completed and for which a funding plan has not been identified would not only be premature,it would be irresponsible. Cordially, PETE WILSON STATE CAFC L • SACrrAMF TQ, Cnt.t Fci rr 95814 . (916)445-2841 McIntyre, Donald From: Amontes, Nick Sent: Friday, October 16, 1998 11:02 AM To: EMT Subject: FW: Leaky Sewers in Huntington Beach Just in case your reading files are running low. Nick Arhontes Manager,Collection Facilities O&M and Facilities Maintenance Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 narhontes@ocsd.com Ph 714593-7210 Fax 714-962-3071 —Original Meeeega— From: Blend.,Thorne. Sent: Friday, October 16. 1998 9:18 AM To: Arhonte., Nick subject: Huntington Beech Nick I received this from Jerry D. it's very interesting reading. BEACH — Imagine 114 million gallons of raw sewage —equal to the contents of 5,700 average swimming pools— seeping into the soil beneath the streets of Huntington Beach. This may be a difficult scene to fathom for the typical resident. Yet that's how much sewage has been lost since 1996. And it hasn't stopped. At least 147,000 gallons of the city's waste water is lost every day in the Downtown area alone from underground sewer pipelines that are either broken or severely cracked because of old age. Last month, the City Council approved spending $1 million for emergency sewer system repairs in the Downtown area in an effort to head off problems. But that will fund only a band-aid on much- needed system repairs that are expected to cost the city $360 million over the next 50 years — money it doesn't have in its budget-constrained coffers. But there's something even more disturbing to city officials. "We're losing a large amount of sewage, and we don't know where it's going," said Don Noble, maintenance operations manager for the Huntington Beach Public Works Department. City officials speculate the waste water is being absorbed for the most part by the dense soil surrounding the pipelines. However, leakage is just one of many problems facing the city's deteriorating sewer system. "It's one of those things that is out of sight, out of mind," Noble said. "We don't think about it until it fails." Which could be extremely costly in other ways. For example, the city of Thousand Oaks was fined $2.3 million after one of its main sewer arteries released 86 million gallons of raw sewage into the ocean, said Jeffrey Dintzer, an attorney who represents that city. He said city officials maintain the harsh El Nino storms that took place in February caused the sewer line to be washed away, although others disagree. "Some people believe the system needed to be replaced because it was outdated," Dintzer said. He said the matter, now being investigated by the U.S. Attorney's office, is also being appealed to the State Water Quality Control Board —the same agency who issued the $2.3 million fine. 1 Noble said he wouldn't rule out the possibility of sewage reaching the ocean off Huntington Beach. "If sewage came up through the manholes and then flowed to the ocean — yes, it could happen," he said. The purpose of the city's sewer system is to collect waste water from toilets, showers and sinks, and transport it from homes and businesses to the Orange County Sanitation District treatment facility in Fountain Valley. The system includes 10,000 manholes, which workers use to clean and repair 600 miles of pipeline and 28 underground lift stations— mechanisms which help to keep sewage flowing correctly. And Noble said problems infiltrate all parts of the city's sewer system. For example, almost all of the lift stations have a limited storage capacity. "Which means that if a backup occurs, sewage gets everywhere," he said. Pipelines are another serious concern. Some of the city's main sewer problems lie within the Downtown area, where some of the lines are 80 years and older. The typical life of a pipeline is 50 years, Noble said. "It's gotten to the point where we are afraid to clean them," said Jerry Dilks, a crew leader for the city's Wastewater Management Division. 'They'll fall apart on us." Cracks, breaks and deposit build- ups on the inside of lines that can't be removed are part of what the Public Works crews deal with when trying to keep the sewer system working. "When you see a crack, its like dominoes — the line can fall at any minute," Dilks said. 'There are parts [in the system] where there is no sewer at all, just a void." Noble said two state-of-the-art cameras the city purchased about five years ago help keep his staff informed on the state of the city's sewer lines. The cameras, which can examine any line larger than 6-inches in diameter, is what helped the Public Works Department compile a detailed list of the more troublesome pipelines, some of which are losing up to 8,000 gallons of raw sewage per day, he said. The situation's severity is what prompted the City Council's move to approve the $1 million for emergency repairs Downtown. Noble said many of those lines will be mended using a process called slip lining, which involves fitting another line inside the broken pipeline and expanding it to fit the original. Slip lining, which costs much less than replacing the entire pipeline, adds another 70 to 85 years to a line. "Plus we can do it without tearing up the world," Noble added. Yet Public Works officials say the repair schedule for the sewer system needs to be stepped up. Until then, Noble said, the work crews will do everything they can to keep the sewer system operational. Mayor Shirley Dettloff said she is proud of the efforts city staff and the infrastructure committee is putting forth to help solve this problem, which is one that affects the entire community. 'The day the water doesn't turn on or the day you flush and nothing happens, is the day no one will want to live here," she said. "We want to make sure that doesn't happen." QUESTION: PLUMBING PLIGHT What do you think about the problems facing the city's sewer system? Leave your thoughts on our Readers Hotline at 965-7175 or send an e-mail to hbindv(Mearthlink.net <mailto:hbindv(cbearthlink.net> . camas 641111 d .0�GSG C�uJfe�areos Ae 7"//W6%0—8OG-"a_e re.. if orwer 2 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register 3 la',/y C05TA MESA one thousand low-flush toilets designed to save water will be distributed Saturday to water district customers on a first- come,first-served basis. To receive the free toilets, cus- tomers must bring a Mesa Consolidated water bill and identification.They must know the toilet's measure- ments—the distance from the wall to where the white caps on the floor are.Cus- tomers who don't bring in their old toilets as trade-ins will be charged S100. New toilets will be given out from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. at the water district offica, 196E Placentia Ave. Information: (714)631-1200. —Stephen Wala(M)565f902 Newport Beach/Costa Mesa Daily Pilot Thursday, October 8, 1998 Water district giving out low-flush toilets COSTA MESA— Mesa Con- Mesa is able to provide the toi- measurements. A 'rough-in" whilated Water District will help lets through a partnership with measurement is the distance from families cut than water usage by the Orange County Sanitation the wall to the bolts on the floor. giving away 1,000 low-flush toi. District, the Metropolitan Water Customers also must return lets Saturday. District of Southern California than old toilet for recycling to The toilets are expected to and the Municipal Water District avoid being charged$100. save an average family 22,000 of Orange County. The giveaway will be held at gallons of water a year because The white Briggs model toilets the water district, 1965 Placentia they use fewer gallons par flush will be given away to Mesa cus- Ave.,Costa Mesa,from 8 a.m.to 3 than older toilets. tomers on a first-come, first-serve p.m. "Mesa customers should not basis. To receive the toilet, cus- Old toilets can be returned Sal. flush this chance down the tomers must have their account urday or Oct. 17 or Oct.24. drain," spokeswoman Lynette numbers or a copy of their water Round said. bill,identification and "rough-in" —Elise Gee LAGUNA HILLS The El Toro Water Recycling Plant takes in about 5 million gallons of wastewater daily and treats it so it can be used to irrigate the Leisure World Golf Course and other green areas. Local residents are invited to tour the newly upgraded plant Oct.3 and we how this water recycling works.The open house is from ]0 a.m. to 2 p.m.at the plant,23542 Moulton Park- way.The El Toro Water District just completed a two-year,$14 million repo- vation project at the 33- yearold plant,which is ca. pable of processing 6 million gallons of wastewater a day. Information: (949) 937.7050, En.M. -his Yokel (949)45dra40 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section I Page # I Date Subject Los Angeles Times eaZo� g 9l y�5� r �:� • �Jec �1s Two for California egislative success often depends on With the bond dead, Assemblyman Bob spotting an opportunity and seizing it. Hertzberg (D-Sherman Oaks) and Sen. Steve That was the case in Sacramento this Peace (D-San Diego)quickly moved the $235 week with two major bills:a big water trans- million into a bill to appropriate the money fer from Imperial Valley farms to the San directly from the state's general fund. They Diego urban area and purchase of the Head- maneuvered it to passage in tandem with the waters stand of old-growth redwood trees in Headwaters bill, which passed during the fi- far Northern California. nal moments of the session. For the state to Both were controversial issues and both underwrite a contract involving three giant had big price tags—$242 million for the and wealthy water districts is unorthodox. Headwaters grove and $235 million to effect But the importance of the transfer to future the farm-to-city water shift. H the Legisla- Southern California water supplies was too ture and Gov. Pete Wilson had failed to act great to let the chance slip by. this year, the chance of achieving either Purchase of Headwaters from Pacific Lum- particularly saving the spectacular trees— her Co.first was negotiated by the company, might have been lost forever. Fortunately, federal officials, Sen.. Dianne Feinstein (D- the state had the money available in the Calif.) and Wilson. But the deal was chal- $4.4-billion state budget surplus. The other lenged for the lack of strict controls on log- element that brought success on the issues ging stands adjacent to the tall trees. Of spe- was the determination of the governor and cial concern was the impact on streams used key legislators. by the endangered Coho salmon to spawn. The $235-million subsidy for the water Sen. Bryon Sher (D-Stanford) insisted on transfer originally was included in a pro- tougher restrictions, which were critical to posed $1.6-billion water and flood control the bill's success. The payoff to Pacific was bond issue,one of the most vigorously nego- sweetened with additional funds for neighbor tiated compromises of the legislative ses- ing stands of redwoods. Pacific comes away sion.But the bond issue collapsed at the last with nearly $500 million in state and federal moment when Wilson and farm groups mr funds and the environmentalists still com- ststed that a $57-million. item for reservoir plain that the logging controls we not tough planning be upped to$157 million. enough. Wilson blamed the failure on "radical no, But without these elements, forged in in- growth" elements working through Senate tense negotiations,the opportunity to buy the President Pro Tern John Burton(D-San Fran- ancient redwoods would have been lost. Wil- cisco). But participants in the delicate nego- son, Sher and others insisted on an arrange- tiations insisted that was not so.The deal was ment that would best achieve everyone's ulti- broken by the premature demand for more mate goal: to put the trees into inviolate reservoir money, a move that threatened to public protection. undercut a joint state-federal project to de- It's said that the legislative process is like velop ways to remedy environmental deamic- making sausage—you'd rather not see it tion to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta done. In these cases,working out the details caused by water exports to Southern Califon was messy at times, but the outcomes were nia and the San Joaquin Valley. double victories for California. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings FL[__0� Name of Paper Section Page # Date ubject s Angeles Times Q 9 z89� lVerJPb•f,Cs[i S.�f WX Leaders Look Upstream for Bay-Silt Remedy ■Environment: With funds for dredging scarce,officials hope a into a fund to help offset the coat of dredging work. federal study will offer preventive solutions to sediment deposits. The measure was held hostage last going to look at Iota of for month by Assembly Democratic leaders In improvements By ERIC BAILEY p the closing days of the legislative session. TIMM STAFF WRITER upatrewn," said Dave Riff,assistant to the Over the protests of Johnson, Democrats city manager in Newport Beach."There's a amended It to provide only a one-time With stale lawmakers unwilling to R• huge watershed up there running Into Lake payment of $200,0OD for future dredging Hance long-term relief for silt-choked Forest and the Irvine hills.This will be the work. Upper Newport Bay, local officials are first time its been significantly studied." Gov. Pete Wilson signed the measure beginning to eye corrective measures that For years, local officials have focused this week,but Johnson vowed an Thursday might keep harmful sediment from ever their energies m gelling money to pay for to return next year and seek again to get a reaching the ecologically sensitive wet- dredging work to remove mud and silt that permanent funding source for dredging. land. accumulates In the brackish bay, which is "We II aggressively pursue it again next Newport Beach officials are hopeful a home to scores of rare fish and bird species. year,"Johnson said. study planned by the U.S. Army Corps of But funding has always been bard to Local officials welcome such help but are Engineers will spotlight steps that could be come by. increasingly turning their attention to taken,to better catch sediment along San State Senate Republican Leader Roes more permanent solutions upstream. Diego Creek, the main tributary�mto the Johnson (R-Irvine) tried to solve that Officials hope the Army Corps of Engl- upper bay. ongoing money problem with a hill this nears will complete a study by the end of "The long-term strategy for the bay is year that would have put$400,ODO annually Please see BAY,B5 BAY: Exploring Preventive Measures Continued from An sooner if financing can be found. convinced that dredging will al- 2000 and then move to fund proj- "What we've done upstream has ways he necessary. And since the ects along San Diego Creek and gotten in the way of nature," Kiff bay is a stale-owned ecological smaller tributaries leading to the said. "Grading the hills, over-irri- reserve, he said. "it's a state re- bay, which typically must be gating, all those things contribute sponsibllity,and the stale ought to dredged every five years to main- to sediment deposits in the bay. set aside funding." tain the proper water depth needed We're going to try to use science to for the fish and birds that Dock to. reverse that." the 752-acre ecological reserve. The upper bay is home to the; Three basins already exist along light-footed clapper rail and the; San Diego Creek to catch silt,but Belding's Savannah sparrow, two s t authorities say further Improve- birds on the state's endangered . meats are needed The huge flows species list It also hosts two en-i during last winter's storms con- dangered plants, the salt marsh. Let our vinced experts they need to seek bird's beak and the raze Laguna more permanent-ways to slow the Beach live-forever.Five other rare' ADVER1100 SALES TEAM water so lees sediment cascades or endangered birds visit the bay, drive our next sales down to the bay. including the least tem. the brown Y Possible solutions Include Intro- pelican and the California gnat- event With ads that seRj ducing types of vegetation.along catcher. More than 75 fish species the channels that can better an- Inhabit the waters, among them Call The Times Omngs Courys chorlhesoil. the California halibut and barred Advemsing Sales al 7141966-5719 If all goes well,work could begin sand bass. about 2002, Kiff said, although While he weicomse upstreamEM some projects that enjoy unanl- efforts to keep sediment from sYAN01C0ggIT moue support might gel going even reaching the bay,Johnson remains Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County RegisterSubject range t?s�- F Water district files suit to recover $2.2 million Irvine Ranch Water District officials announced late Tues- day that they filed a lawsuit Monday to recover$2.2 million they say was wrongfully divert- ed from the district's conserva- tion program, Operation Out- reach. The suit names Wayne Smith, SO,of Tustin,a former IRWD employee; and landscape con- tractors Robert Baier,54, of Seal Beach; J. Randall Ismay, 48,of Laguna Niguel; and Rob- ert Casey,41,of San Dimas. Baier, the only one of the four who could be reached late Tues- day,referred questions to his lawyer, who was not available. The District Attorney's office filed criminal charges against Smith,Baier,Casey and Ismay on Aug. 18,alleging the four had conspired to commit grand theft and misappropriation of IRWD funds targeted for irriga- tion- and landscaping• improve- ment efforts under the Opera- tion Outreach program. The criminal charges were filed in connection with a year- long investigation by Irvine po- lice and the district attorney into Operation outreach. Irvine was among dozens of water-district customers that were allegedly used by the four, who are accused of creating phony invoices for water-con- servation work that was never done, police said. Air Board Chief to Quit After Key Meeting By MARLA CONE TIMES ENVIROMMOlTAL WRMR Gov. Pete Wilson's chief air quality aide—who heads the state'a Air Resources Board—has re- signed effective next month to \ accept an executive Job represent- ing private industry. y RX State officials had expected John Dunlap to leave his post before the term asend of the year, because Wilson's ends in January. ,N 1 Bu Dun apehasrtimed his depar. (� a tore, erected Nov, 9, an he can •L y OU preside over the air board's w important Nov. 5 decision on y y whether car manufacturers must N make further cute in emissions 0 from automobiles, especially sport (� \ utillyvehiclea Dunlap'e new Job will he u chief O executive officer at the California Restaurant Aasn., a Sacramenm- •CL LOauuledmom than IDDDmanuranan other food service bustnesaes. •= V S His decision to leave smog work L « eurpriaes many Insiders. Wilson U) no N appointed Dunlap chairman of the Q 0 I air board in late 1994, and he has worked quality yea ccandother eavIonmen al arenas; Q for at least 16 years. Dunlap's role (Jj y has been controversial, especially Im since the board under his leader- O m ship eliminated a rule that would V z have required 2% of automobiles, said in California to be electric C beginning this year. After 0 post. Dunlap might stay on the = m board representing the governor to while giving up the chairmanship L and position on Wilson's staff, said ODunlap's spokesman Joe frvla N The restaurant group has been involved in tote( air quality issues because restaurants with eber- E brollers emit smog-forming gases y` F, Under state law,however, Dunlap a carnet lobby air quality agencies m (n for one year. a d "Clearly It's a terrific opportu- o y ally for John, and he's really m ZM exited about it and theyre exited E C about him,"Irvin said. "He wanted m a to try something new." Z The president of the restaurant y0 group said Dunlap's leadership J skills in heading the state agency will be valuable In directing the association's dealings with labor, government and the public. State Lottery Chief to Join -- Private Sector ■ Administration:Former Orange County CEO William Popejoy is among dozens of (n to Wilson appointees leaving posts. V t� BYCAPLINGBAM r •L 1—I TIMES STAFF wartEa '" _ y SACHAMENTO—William J. Popejoy. 0 N (fie the businessman who helped extract y Orange County from the worst local gov- ernment bankruptcy to the nation's his- ".L tory, said Friday that he will resign as •� :... O director of the California Lottery next Q. month. � p, Popejoy, 60, appointed by Gov, Pete w Wilson in April 1997 to run the f2-bunion enterprise, said he intends to return to V private enterprise,but has no job in mind "We have accomplished everything that O ' I had hoped to be part of," he said in an William J. Popejoy Q. interview. �.� Popejoy is among scores of top-level a Wdson appointees making plans for other a PDPEJDY employment in advance of a new Arninis- N m [ration in January. In [ion Low,a spokesman for the governor, Continued from In. dsaid Eugene Balonon. a veteran lottery eceesors, Popeja}'s term was rela- (� executive,will be appointed acting director lively free of controversy.He drew Z for the remainder of Wilson's term. The criticism,however, when he elimi- CD Post PxYs SI09,000 a year. nated the jobs of 25% of We work Popejoy came to Wilson's attention in force, or 218 employees,in a cos[- o FQ 1995 ae a strong-willed, blunt-spoken cutting action.He said Friday that <» businessman appointed by the Orange only four have not found otherjobs County Hoard of Supervisors to lead the instate government or retired county out of bankruptcy. Popejoy said that during the 0 As the county's chief executive, he past fiscal year, the lottery pro- imposed several reforms but quit five. duced almost $750 million for ymonths later,charging that the supervisors schools, an increase of 11% over had become so meddlesome that he could the previous year. not do his job.His departure also followed He forecast that annual rev- comes to schools will increase by m voter rejection of a sates-tax increase that n' he argued was essential for fiscal recover t25U w elt- on as a result of a b s (A Popejoy arrived at the lottery amid tightening Program aimed at re- a)d demands that it be made more efficient, coosttss lottery's madminis[rativule . d attract more players and produce higher E revenue for public schools. revenue to leas than 13.5% by [Unlike the tenures of most of his pred M. - Z Q Pleau see POPFJOY,n1Y Popejoy said It is unlikely he will return to government"I feel like a to) - very useful 60-Year-old and rd O like to return to the private sector. .J if that works out,"he said Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times ;N SS g t Judge Sets Decision on Firms' Liability in O.C. Bankruptcy By E SCOTT RECKARD county contends they are dill TIME WAIT"ITPR liable for its entire t1.6-billion loss for aiding an investment A ruling on the extent of scheme so risky that Citron had brokerages Ilabllity for Orange no authority to undertake it. County's bankruptcy was de- Arguing before U.S. District layed Monday by a judge who Judge Cary L.Taylor In Santa grilled lawyers for an hour Ana. F1p lawyer Nancy J. before saying he will rule neat Sennett contended that state month. law permitted Citron to make A ruling against the broker- his investments. ages could set the stage for Taylor said he would rule in Orange County to recover writing"in a couple of weeks." large sums beyond the U he decided Citron acted $739 million in settlements it within his authority, the already has reached county could recover at most The county grin has active about Ee mWim from F5rj1 and suits against 15 Wall Street little or nothing from other firms,Including Fuji Secoritln brokers,county lawyers said Inc.,that helped finance former Suits based on different county Trneurer Robert L theories continue against Citron's multibillion-dollar Standard&Poor'e,which gave speculations on interest rates. county municipal bonds top Unlike Merrill Lynch&Co., ratings before the December. which settled civil claims for 1994 bankruptcy, and against $437 million, none of 15 re- Who Ramcher Inc., which ad- mxining fume had a close rela- wised the county on issuing tlonshfp with Citron. But the those bonds. News Relwee hnpriwww,mwa.Os�u.uvpv"wvnewvreorncayp.me. WODRASKA RESIGNS AS MWD GENERAL MANAGER September 29, 1998 — John R. Wodraska, general manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California who directed the agency through the most politically challenging and construction-intense period in its 70-year history, resigned today to take a position at a newly created international water business. Calling it "the right decision for me and for MWD," Wodraska tendered his resignation after 51/2 years with the district in a two-page letter to Metropolitan's board of directors. Wodraska leaves Metropolitan to become managing director of North America at Azurix, a newly created global water business based in Houston, Texas. A subsidiary of Enron, a worldwide integrated natural gas and electricity company, Azurix (ah-ZOOR-ix) was formed in July to own and operate strategic water and wastewater assets, develop related infrastructure, and extend critical risk management and finance skills into the international water market. "This is a difficult moment for me-one of mixed and strained emotions," Wodraska said. "I am truly excited about the personal and professional opportunities that lie ahead for me. But I am equally saddened at the prospect of leaving MWD." Known as "Woody" to friends and associates, Wodraska, 50,joined Metropolitan in July 1993 as the district's 1 Oth general manager since its founding in 1928, and the first to be appointed from outside district ranks. "He was the right manager at the right time for this district," said MWD Chairman John V. Foley of Wodraska. "He has guided Metropolitan and Southern California through a critical period in water history. We wish him the best in his future endeavors." Wodraska's decision comes seven weeks after Metropolitan's board approved a historic, 30-year water exchange agreement with the San Diego County Water Authority. Wodraska was instrumental in drafting the memorandum of understanding which ended a two-year impasse between the two agencies over the delivery of water to San Diego from the Imperial Valley. I of J 9/29198 1:59 PM N.R.I. He also was instrumental in the marathon negotiations between state and federal resource agencies as well as Califomias urban, agricultural and environmental interests that resulted in the 1994 Bay-Delta Accord, the agreement on operation of the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, a drinking water source for 16 million Southern Californians. Wodraska played a similar role in the negotiation of major contract revisions regarding State Water Project allocations. Wodraska drew international attention for his managerial accomplishments and leadership of MWD's Integrated Resources Planning(IRP) process aimed at meeting Southern California's future water supply needs. The IRP process resulted in broad public participation and serves as an example of community involvement and consensus-building throughout the nation's water industry. During Wodraska's tenure, the district entered a critical construction period for its multibillion-dollar capital improvement program. Since 1993, the district broke ground on its $2 billion Eastside Reservoir Project, nearly doubling Southern California's surface water storage, and $1.2 billion Inland Feeder, a 43.7-mile pipeline/tunnel project. The district currently is moving into its new headquarters building at Union Station, another project undertaken during Wodraska's leadership. In addition, he reorganized and streamlined MWD's administration and organizational structure, revised the district's revenue structure, and instituted progressive affirmative action and minority contracting programs. "This period has clearly been the most definitive for me as a water manager. The size and scope of MWD is almost incomprehensible. Our ability to face challenges and overcome them has never ceased to amaze me," Wodraska said. "Most importantly, this is a tremendous organization, one which I have been proud to serve and one which will always be in my heart." Prior to joining Metropolitan, Wodraska was with the South Florida Water Management District from 1972 to 1991, the last seven years as its executive director. His earlier SFWMD responsibilities included serving as the district's chief operating officer, lobbyist and planner. After leaving the management district, the largest water agency in the East, he divided his time between Florida Atlantic University and a Florida law firm specializing in water utility and resource issues. Since joining Metropolitan, Wodraska was awarded an honorary doctor of science degree from Wilkes University in 1996. In the same year, he received the first "Excellence in Water Leadership Award" from the Association of California Water Agencies, the William C. Ackerman Medal for Excellence in Water Management from the American Water 2 of 3 9/29193 1:59 PM Ncw Rel.... hnp:.. +�.mwe.astw.uvpWaocvnewvravriwyyi.iw. Resources Association, and the President's Award from the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies for his significant contributions to the improvement of water supply management. A process to replace Wodraska is expected to be announced following Metropolitan's next board meeting, Oct. 13. The Metropolitan Water District is a regional water agency that imports waterfront Northern California and the Colorado River, and delivers it on a wholesale basis to the coastal plain of Southern California. Through its 27 member Public agencies. the district provides almost 60 percent of the water used by nearly 16 million people living in portions of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and Ventura counties. mmmm Comments or Questions-send email to Bob Gomperz. Acting Director, Public Affairs Mailing Address. P.O. Box 54153 Los Angeles, CA 90054-0153 3 of 3 92999 1:59 PM Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page Al Date Subject Orange County Register Mei/10 j 11z)_9_9Y1 Wslfee Ground-water menace may have met match RESEARCH: An MTBE-gobbling bacterium has the MTBE it's fed, she said. MTBE. The chemical,first detected in No drinkingwells have been been isolated by UC-t)aVIBBCiPJItI8t8. The County water in 1996,has concerned water officials closed in Orange County because By The range County it might patent o the ready for use on throughout the state. Added to of the chemical, and it hasn't The Orange County Register g might be ready for use on gasoline to make it burn more been found in any wells since A microscopic creature with ground water in one to two cleanly and reduce air pollution, 1996. But it is widespread in the an unusual appetite might soon Years. MTBE, or methyl tertiary butyl. county's shallow ground water. be enlisted in the fight against "First, we have to make sure ether, leaks into ground water Although this ground waterisnot MTBE—a possible cancer-caus- the organism could survive- from underground fuel-storage used fordrinking,waterofficials in chemical invading Orange wherever it is going to be put," tanks. worry that MTBE could sink into County's shallow ground water. said Jessica Hanson, a doctoral It began turning up in water deeper kinaqug rat which are used Researchers at the University candidate who first isolated the wells throughout California soon for drinking water. of California, Davis, say they bacterium."We've begun to do a after it first was detected in Officials at the Orange County have isolated a soil bacterium little bit of that in the lab." Orange County. Santa Monica, Water District, which passed a that eats MTBE, breaking it So far, the creature seems to for example, had to shut down symbolic resolution this week to down into harmless byproducts. be surviving quite well in bottles municipal drinking-water wells ban MTBE,also have tried to iso- The researchers, who are seek- full of soil, and breaking down contaminated with high levels of late an MTBE-eating microbe. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Oate Subject II Los Angeles Times Siltlep�rda Z ���y fe ��orf[�I Water sbould be source of more concenz L ast week there was a lose 35%of our cheap water, would be 3 billion by the year meeting between the WETLANDS rates could go up to S90 a 2000.Now we know it wt8 be icounty's Local Agency WARRIOR month.Total increases could cost dose to 6 billion.The Public Formation Commission and the citizens about$2 million a Policy Institute at Southern my to discuss two—mmt'em "-: vet : month) Illinois Umversiry says it could tea—annexations.The ttm _ 7:x• ;���;' Some round members think be as high as 12 billion by:050. dealt with whether we should we should annex the land,and And what if history repeats itse_. ! amex the Boise Chicat mesa,and let the developers build because and we find that we agam the other focused on whether weGt�b,5 -s we would get a one-time wind- underestimated as my teachers should allow South County to 2,'^Y fall of S5 million in fees.Well, did? have access to our water sources. +t "} " . that S5 million would trickle in Unless solutions are found If the council agrees to one " '` '+ over countytime years,and m the the result could be femme and or both of these amexatiof _ meantime a could pay up at even wen,m the past 50 years. the incumbent problems g 824 million a year just for watec many wars were fought over on these dedsions will belong to us alp m his new motor Paid Si m the next 50 years,wars could forever. ha1p18 mute formers coup r Paul Swan be fought for water. Development means short- carves that the country is looking They aren't making any mare I water,folks. li term money and long-tern big w a mtiW wear shames,but the fosses.Naturally,any y tod of world is facing a crisis ing t e funds will be bailed by taday's costs$400—four times more! water consumption is ridng twice •BILL bdu t B is a coral resident vow ngton council members as than civic Any of our S94 water that goes as fast as the population. `"dry avant other trio,sumi Sens carments a ether loot issues.Sena contribution,but well start pay- elsewhere will have to he I remember as a boy being P.O.Box 4 and Long to Nun at ing through the nose by me time replaced with$600 water.if we told the population of the world P.O.aw 4asa,Long Beach 9a60a. sEcnoas uaatttrtaCE columnists ome age ® u cress m, -.Mae oaiwG�mtixrcarranu�'. - � i ocrsgistercom k"WL3 - r, r,. gordon Billow obftU-,r _ ,rT- Fish becoming an expensive little IM sucker October6, 1998 Jim Van Haun has been having a recurring bad dream lately. It's a bad dream about a fish. The fish in question isn't the usual stuff of nightmares. It's not a great white shark or a barracuda or some other deadly predator. No,the fish that inhabits Van Haun's bad dreams is the lowly Santa Ana sucker, a seemingly innocuous, 6-to 8-inch-long fish that nibbles algae off of rocks. What makes this tiny fish so scary, for Van Haun and others, is the strong possibility that it could wind up on the endangered species list. Van Hann, you see, is the associate general manager of the Orange County Water District,which uses a six-mile stretch of the Santa Ana sucker's natural habitat—that is, the Santa Ana River—to recharge the ground water supply that provides most of the water used by 2 million Orange Countians. And if the little sucker does wind up on the endangered list—well, as Van Haun puts it, "For a water manager, it's kind of a bad dream. In the very worst case, it could have serious effects on our operations." But Van Hann shouldn't be the only guy having bad dreams about the Santa Ana sucker. Because if it is deemed endangered, efforts to save it from extinction http://www.ocregister.com/conirnunity/dillow.shtml 10/6/98 vi.nnvaa i LA.l Ulvl. w1ta11tasu: rage J ut won't have much say in the matter. If the Santa Ana sucker gets on the endangered list, bureaucrats and the courts will be calling the shots. So I guess we can only hope that they'll be reasonable in their efforts to save the Santa Ana sucker. Otherwise, what is now a bad fish dream could easily turn into a bona fide fish nightmare. Gordon Dillow may be reached at(714)953-7953. al newspaper in OmngeC mty, 'oma UegYsfier COMM998 The Orange County Register Pk s mmmenh W oaeavler@Ina.heeGpm.mm http://www.ocregister.com/community/dillow.shtml 10/6/98 Sewage spill shuts portion of Seal beach .��� • �• - C®6it<@94i1E6A� ^y�l sEcttoxs 9 ' teaaKcntw� ome a e — R I" u cress r�i � ,,' fkeoxnise oounrraccustrx- . � I t 0cmigma.com outskle."ou.*iZounty eanrha ::' Sewage spill shuts portion of Seal fire a><n 06kuarnss_,_._mi.:.r L. Beach October 13, 1998 By HEATHER MacDONALD The Orange County Register An overflowing sewage pipe closed a small portion of , t Seal Beach Sunday morning, but officials said the whole beach should be open again Wednesday morning. "The crowds this time of year are minimal," said IMP lifeguard Jeff Aldinger. "You couldn't even tell the WrTITMERNMEM difference." About 10 am. Sunday, a surfer notified lifeguards that a pipe on the Seal Beach Municipal Pier was emptying into the ocean and onto the beach. The Orange County Enviromental Health Department determined that the liquid was wash water and sewage, said lifeguard Capt. Steve Cushman. "Now we're just waiting for the water samples, which shouldn't take more than another day or so," Cushman said. Roughly 100 yards of the beach was closed on both sides of the pier, from Eighth Street to 10th Street. Bathrooms on the pier were also closed.No swimmers, surfers or sunbathers were turned away because of the spill, nor was anyone sickened or injured, officials said. The pipe feeds into a holding tank in the Eighth Street parking lot, which in turn connects to the main sewer on Ocean Avenue. The contents of the pressurized holding tank empty into the main tank twice an hour, or when the holding tank is full. When the pipe overflowed, so did the holding tank, sending the http://www.ocregister.com/archives/1998/10/13/community/beach013w.shtml 10/14/98 Sewage spill shuts portion of Seal Beach Page 2 of 2 sewage into the ocean. The city-owned pipe removes waste from nearby Ruby's Restaurant. Business at the restaurant was not affected by the spill. L1 newspaper in Orange uMy, 1 mra ..•.fie . Copyright 1998 n e Orange Gooniy Register Please send comments W ].ssMfl k beep m - •••.• :N .�� rmmhi�•�cyl04Ry1011WcnmmonitW`heach013w.shtml 10/14/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page# I Date Subject _ Orange County Register tNq„Is S' lof,'9a City looks to master disaster via YX drill MILLENNIUM: Lub- sandal city computers fail to roc- "This Is not about us trying to prove we dering workers to land the D.C., about the results of their ognim the new millennium. streets. drills. bock, Texas, practices City crews, including police, are ready for this, this is about us seeing Drill operators also sent arc Same computer sdenusts say responding to computer fire and utility workers,were as the holes that may exist because We've poll that$man haddrownedina the Y K bugcould cause water masted to simulate massive small pond, and a mock riot supplies lA shut down, traffic failures coupled with computer fafluresin the muntof never faced anything like this before." brokeoutateprim just outside lights to Is haywire,lifesup"n problems such as wits- mock natural disasters. Alm gay pgraggy of town, system$to fail—even planes to ther and prison riots. planned were computer failures lubbork pol esmen In what may issue been the fall out of the sky. P so serious they could cousedisas- first actual Y2K-related crisis, When a General Moto. in. Otank ateN ters themselves. thing announced was a four-hour In the hours before the stmu- thee' s911 rency$Yale. ran a Y2K test on a plant compel. The drills involved test conduo window,starting at S p.m.,when lated midnight, emergency airs wasso vefm Imtasthe er system,it was discovered that lbe aeoruted Pten [ors sending Email messages to anything could happen. ciao grappled with all sell of driuperiod began. se�,�rit d��ors wereamckclosed. LUBBOCK,Texas—Highaech city officials notifying Them of "This is not about.trying to mayhem unrelated to comput- OfDclala quickly switched over hubboc—FCTgeror SbZa$r--' doomsday, Arrived early to this problems or faded systems while prove we are ready for this,this any. to a county ayetem end broad raid even each minor failures on west Texas city. arro[her system was set up to Pa about us seeing the holes that Mock circumstances included teat two new police and fire de a citywide level could parelyre a I With just W days before the judge response time. may exist beaux we've never a aid front that blew in from the partment emergency numbers community, so called YM bug hits,city om- Bundy what or when the"di faced anything like this before." north,chilling temperatures into on television. "We all had better figure out clabapeededuptMdockatotat a9ters" would.o[cur was kept city spokesman Tony Privet the lower teens, icing over Members of Congress have what It wW be likelooperate in their readine. for the coons secret until the drills started said. There Is absolutely no strats and causing power out. asked officials from Lubbock to city where many compute. many believe could occur If es- Wednesday evening. The only manual on how to handle this." ages. Officials responded by or- testify Friday in Washington, have failed,"Ca.laid. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register �" Vz n 3 Id 719 SEAL BEACH The city will man accept bids to replace an 8-inch sewer line that runs from Marble Cove and Crystal Cove Way to the main line on Pacific Coast Highway.The current sewer line is Q years old and intersects vacant par- cels along the streers front- age. The project is expected to be completed in Novem• bar at a cost of 52S,09p. -Sylvia Maridlt7701 445.6695 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # I Date Sub ct Orange County Register m�« 3 13 e-4Q s��v��� o*� J u-s SV,c� DANA POINT The Capistrano Beach water District Board decided Wednes. day it will hold a workshop to educate the public before allowing its staff to negoti. ate with investment bankers for the sale of about$14 mil- lion in bonds. The money is being raised to help pay for a capital improvement pro- gram that staff says will carry the district's infra- structure though the next 20 years.General Manager Dennis MacLain said the improvements can be made without a rate increase until 2005,when a 1 percent to 2 percent rate hike may be implemented. The date of the workshop has not been set. Information: (949) 248- 3990. — DenNr Kalsed(999)4s0.7329 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Forange County Register VA 3 Io��lyg c,�•, r C*i�a �sck� W �,i c�. �.� DANA POINT The Capistrano Beach Water District witi hold a special board meeting at 6:30 p.m. today with a workshop, staff presentation and discussion of the possible sale of about $14 million in bonds to fi- nance the district's capital Improvements program. About$6 million of the fund- ing will go to a proposed ground-water recovery plant the district says wilt gener- ate savings for its custom. ers. By recovering ground water,the district expects to shve enough money to pay off the bonds without a rate increase until after MS. The meeting is in the South East Regional Reclamation Authority operations build- ing at 34156 Del Obispo St. Information: (949) 749-3940. —Denis Kaiser f949145473i9 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Orange County Register ��Ce o 3 lo/4//� Qt�_ n• : Subject '� r3� `uo. C.e.$. 1ilo�ec C� lllkc p_ lour\1as��9;�¢'ts PLACENTIA The Southern California Water Co.is offering more than 1,000 free ultra-low nosh toi- lets to its customers in Pla- centia and elsewhere on a first-come,first-served ba- sis. Distribution—limit two per household—will be from 9 a.m, to 2 p.m.Satur- day at 1930 W.Corporate Way,Anaheim.To partici- pate,you must: bring a copy of your most recent water bill; a current photo fD or driver's license; and install the new toilets and retum the old ones to the company within two weeks. The new toilets use 1.6 gal- lons of water per flush rum. pared to the standard 5 to 7 gallons. —AM Pepper 01417043717 Pollution Juriaues at ninon runt Zw5 GO le n eXi� GO i t i W A SECTION HELPV c' heck out far. �j► what's new ona ay, cto erY1Y6 Pollution Surfaces at Rincon Point ■Health: Discovery of virulent microbes forces Santa Barbara County officials to shut down beach, one of the most polluted in Southland. By OARY POLAKOV/C, Times SrafJWrirer INCON POINT--If surfing were a religion, which it virtually is along much of the California coast,this rocky little nub IS miles north of Ventura would be sacred shore. Winter swells peel around the point, grow into thunderous ADVERTISEMENT barrel rolls and launch board riders on runs so long and smooth that they become the stuff of legend. "Rincon's a killer. . . . You can surf anything from a body News board to a bam door out here," said Peter Berkey of Montecito, a surfer who pulled off U.S. 101 recently to inspect the waves. But this year, swimmers and surfers are staying away, because a virulent brew of microbes is lurking inside the tubular breakers. Santa Barbara County health officials have closed Rincon t ' • II I i Point,or posted health advisories,every day except four ^ between Jan. 1 and Oct. 4. The beach immortalized by the Itl) l� Beach Boys song, "Surfin' Safari," and known to surfers around Mrr♦la:+ the world as the "Queen of the Coast," now ranks as one of the most polluted stretches of shoreline in Southern California. The discovery demonstrates that even far-flung parts of the California coast are no longer safe from pollution long identified with Cuban areas. The problem underscores the difficulty of making the nation's waters fit for swimming 26 years after passage of the Clean Water Act. The origin of the contamination at Rincon Point is a mystery,although farms, septic tanks, horse corrals and orchards are suspected. Whatever the cause, more pollution hot spots such as Rincon are bound to surface as new state laws take effect in April requiring more rigorous ocean water-quality testing, setting tougher standards and mandating public notification of hazardous conditions. "We're going to see a huge rise in beach closures. If people are checking the water more frequently,they are going to find more pollution," said Catherine Kuhlman, associate director of the water division at.the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's California office. Rincon Point,and the two beaches that flank it on the boundary between Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, is a http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000090474.htm1 10/5/98 Pollution Surtaces at Ktncon Point rage z of place of tranquillity and beauty.The only intrusion is a sign warning"Nudity Prohibited." The danger may arise in the Santa Ynez Mountains,which tower above the beach. Rincon Creek flows past several dozen homes on Rincon Point on its way to the ocean. Gerry Winant of the Santa Barbara County ocean water- monitoring program wades into the surf off Rincon each Monday and scoops up a water sample at the mouth of the creek. When the sample is analyzed,a shocking image emerges. Some of the samples contain bacteria counts that are off the chart.Three tithes this year,Winama instruments have measured 30,000 coliform organisms—the maximum their equipment measures. The health standard for coliform,an indicator of fecal material at which water is considered contaminated,is 10,000. As a result,Rincon has been closed 105 days this year. On an additional 168 days, advisories have been posted warning surfers and swimmers to use the water at their own risk. Excessive bacteria are the most common form of beach water pollution. Last year, 5,199 beaches were closed or health advisories were issued in the United States. About 69°/a of the time excessive bacteria was to blame,according to data released by the environmental advocacy group Natural Resources Defense Council and endorsed by the EPA. Storm water drains, including creeks, streams and flood control channels,are big polluters in rural areas. While laws have been passed to force factories and sewage treatment plants to clean up,there are no requirements to clean storm water drains in places like Rincon Point. A 1996 USC study of 15,492 swimmers at Santa Monica Bay found bathers at storm drains got sick 57%more than people swimming only 400 yards away. Sicknesses caused by exposure to the microbes resemble flu-like symptoms, including fevers, severe stomach aches, vomiting,respiratory illness and ear,nose and throat problems. Some of the bacteria cause hepatitis and dysentery. "It's shocking to people how much bacteria is in the water at beaches near places where there's storm water runoff, say a creek or rivers or storm drain," said Mark Pumford, environmental specialist for the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board,which has jurisdiction over water quality in Ventura County. Santa Barbara and Ventura counties are poised to launch a joint study to pinpoint the origin of pollution at Rincon. Santa Barbara County has agreed to cover half the cost of the $25,000 study,and the Ventura County supervisors are expected to agree to cover the remainder at their Oct. 13 meeting. Topping the list of contamination suspects are 72 homes plopped right on the shore in the exclusive Rincon Point gated community. Kevin Cosmer and other celebrities have homes there that rely on septic tanks. Judith Meyer,a Rincon Point resident and microbiology professor at Santa Barbara City College,knew something was amiss at the beach by her home.Her son frequently became ill after he surfed, so she began testing the waters. The results http://www.latimes.com/HOMEINEWS/ASECTIONh000090474.html 10/5/98 Pollution burtaces at IUncon Point rage of j stunned her. "Nobody wanted to admit we had a problem," Meyer said. "They didn't want it to get out of the gate." Copyri t 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times far similar smries about COASTAL AREAS—VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENT— VENTURA COUNTY,OCEAN POLLUTION BEACHES.BACTERIA HEALTH HAZARDS,PUBLIC SAFETY.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. http://www.latimes.comtHOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000090474.html 10/5198 Da.:uug w wp....♦u:tnu.a.v�uu...,G ...e- - .._ _ iNews � ORAIVGECO.VNTY YifitNS:'_ •, „i i MEL'P Friday, cto Backlog of Capital Repairs Mounting ■Tens of millions of dollars are needed for infrastructure improvements countywide,but taxpayers have balked. Safety issues add urgency. By SC07T AMRT=, Ttmw Staff Wriw 40 rues across Orange County,particularly those with older urban cores,face millions of dollars in mounting RELATED maintenance backlogs ranging from crumbling roads to O.C. SECTIONS inadequate flood-control channels to aging sewer lines. Although government officials know what the needs are,in MAIN PAGE many cases they don't know one key detail:how to pay for the repairs,which become more difficult and costly the longer they HEWS BY are left undone. COMMUNITY For example,about a quarter of the county's 6,600 miles of SPORTS surface streets are in poor or very poor condition,according a March report to the Orange County Transportation Authority. PREP SPORTS The report estimated it would cost cities$150 million a year to - BUSQIPSs keep streets from deteriorating further,but that only$50 million to $60 million was being budgeted annually. LffE&STYLE More than a decade ago, Orange County planners compiled a list of$1.1 billion in flood-control projects to protect existing CALENDAR communities and channel raging flood waters in areas where communities were planned. So far, only about 10%of the CALENDAR CALEND WEEKEND projects have been completed, and critical work to storm channels in Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa that HOME DESIGN experienced devastating flooding in 1983 remains undone. The reason: lack of cash. COMMENTARY "It's a hell of a backlog," said Sara Bavan,the county's chief T.V.T IWS of flood control programs. "We generally find that we are reactive, because of the lack of funds." And with age comes deterioration—as Westminster found out last month when a 30-year-old water tank ruptured, unleashing a flash flood of 5 million gallons of water that FDVEFMSEMEtrr injured six people,destroyed 10 homes and damaged at least 60 other buildings. Preliminary damage estimates began at$20 million. As city officials investigated the cause of the rupture, an News acrimonious local debate has broken out over whether better http://www.latimes.com/HONEE/NEWS/0RANGF/t000089515.html 1012/98 monitoring could have prevented the incident. Critics, t including some former city officials,said Westminster should have gone ahead with plans in 1991 to double water rates to finance a better maintenance and repair program. Instead, the city reacted to public outcry and raised rates only 15%. School districts face similar challenges,trying to maintain older buildings while adding classrooms to handle growing student populations and class-size reductions in elementary grades. Yet even when the money is available, the work doesn't always get done. Los Angeles voters last year approved a$2.4- billion proposition to catch up with deferred repairs and build new schools. By April, one year after the issue was approved, only 8%—or 814 of 10,699 projects—of the five-year plan had been completed. Delays in Repair May Create Safety Hazards Meanwhile,the backlog has increased,and some officials worry that$2.4 billion might not be enough,touching off a debate over whether old schools should be repaired or new ones built to handle overcrowding. In Orange County,few of the deferred projects,such as disintegrating sidewalks,are considered threats to public safety. But some of the delays have experts worried. County engineers acknowledge that many storm channels cannot withstand a historic deluge. Antiquated sewer systems need to be improved,officials said,to avoid lines cracking that could result in environmental problems. The backlogs points up the challenge that faces city officials who must persuade taxpayers to spend millions of dollars to repair items,such as storm drains, that they never see. The problem extends nationwide. In highways alone,a congressional transportation committee report four years ago concluded that the nation needed$212 billion to repair highways in poor to fair condition. That didn't include repairs to the one in three bridges that were "structurally deficient or functionally obsolete." The crux of the problem, nationally as well as locally,for public policy officials lies in balancing priorities. When funding falls off, maintenance is usually among the fast areas scaled back. Maintenance and capital improvements are often a difficult sell at budget time,as the public clamors for more police patrols,recreation programs and computers in classrooms. "The people who get laid off are people like maintenance workers, because [administrators] keep the priority on public safety," said Sandra Sutphen,a political science professor at Cal State Fullerton who specializes in public administration and emergency management. For example, Fullerton cut 53 jobs—about a third of the work force—from its maintenance department over the last decade,said Robert Savage,city director of maintenance.The city spends about$14.6 million a year on capital maintenance, but still has a backlog of sidewalk, street,building and park repairs and maintenance, he said. When Orange County went into bankruptcy in 1994,all but essential maintenance projects—those considered a matter of http://www.latimes.com/HOM&NEWS/0RANGE/t000089515.html 10/2/98 ..........,d ... ....r..... ...r...................g rage J ul public safety—were put off, said Rick Dostal, administrative manager in the county's budget office. "You figure you can put off maintaining buildings and do it next year,then next year comes around and you put it off until the year after that,"Dostal said. "It kind of builds on itself." Eventually,though,the work has to get done.Earlier this year the county Board of Supervisors approved a$41-million, seven-year plan to catch up with deferred maintenance, involving projects ranging from balky air conditioners to leaky roofs. "We're still putting forth a million or two for ongoing maintenance as we chip away at the backlog," Dostal said. "Anything we felt would be a safety hazard, even during the bankruptcy,we addressed." Yet even during cash-flush times,attention paid to maintenance issues is a function of the local political atmosphere, Sutphen said. `rbe issue is local leadership," she said. "If the city manager will put this high on his or her agenda,the city council will more likely pay attention." In most municipalities,she said,council members serve part time and in many cases rely on administrators' recommendations for which projects to undertake. "But they're also very dependent on immediate critical issues,and anything that comes up that is politically sensitive is going to take priority over these longer-range issues," Sutphen said. "Particularly in an election year,they're going to be responsive to people in the community yelling and screaming about a new traffic signal versus such a boring issue as there might be a leak in the reservoir." The problem extends beyond local government to school districts. A report last year by the Coalition for Adequate School Housing estimated that schools statewide will need$6 billion over the next decade to catch up with deferred maintenance. About nine out of 10 schools needed major repairs or maintenance,making the state among the worst in the nation, the report said. Orange County school districts reported$205 million in deferred maintenance projects that will need to be completed over the next five years. Voters will be presented with a$9.2- billion statewide bond issue in November that would build and repair public school facilities from kindergarten through graduate school. Last year,the Orange County Sanitation District hiked sewer rates by as much as 100%in certain areas in part to finance nearly$1.6 billion in capital improvements. The district handles sewage for more than 1.5 million people roughly living north of the El Toro Y. District officials were harshly criticized by some residents for the steep hikes,but they argued that older portions of the sewer system in cities like Santa Ana needed repairs, and that the entire system had to be expanded to handle increased demands from surging populations. At the local level, many cities report no backlog of maintenance,particularly places like Irvine,which is less than 30 years old. http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/0RANGE/t000089515.htm1 10/2/98 Older cities,though,have more pressing problems. Keith Comrie,the Los Angeles city administrator, said the ' city has fallen behind in its street maintenance efforts. About 3,000 miles of streets currently require some level of maintenance or repair,he said. An average of I50 miles of the city streets are resurfaced each year—well below the goal of covering 200 miles a year.In some years,only 50 miles have been done,he said. In Huntington Beach,city officials expect to spend$6.3 million this fiscal year on emergency repairs, including$1 million on the sewer system,$12 million on streets and $400,000 to replace the City Hall roof. But city officials also have identified about$217 million in expected projects over the next 20 years. It has referred the - issue to a citizens advisory committee,which is studying which projects to tackle first and how to pay for them. In Tustin,the physical state of the city has become a political issue in the fall election.Three of the city's six water tanks need repairs. Two have wooden lids that need to be replaced, and one needs a new retaining wall, said Water Services Manager Gary Veeh. 'Concerns Have Fallen on Deaf Ears' Although city engineers say the problems won't lead to structural breaches,at least one candidate—Lou Bone--had raised the condition of the tanks weeks before the Westminster tank collapse. After the collapse,Bone argued that "infrastructure concerns in the city of Tustin have fallen on deaf ears." However,Veeh said a project to replace the retaining wall is in the design stage,and that repairs to the deteriorating roofs will probably follow after completion of a new water tank under construction at Main Street and Prospect Avenue. In Seal Beach,the city has accrued a backlog of minor projects deferred in recent years because of finding problems. Now that financial pressures have lessened with the improving economy, city officials are chipping away at the backlog, said Steve Badum,public works director. For example,city officials are accepting bids for renovations to public restrooms beneath Seal Beach Pier—a project that has been needed for several years,Badum said. And always lurking in the future are the vestiges of the past. Cities that were developed in sections tend to fall apart the same way. "The problem is when cities get old," Badum said, "they tend to deteriorate in chunks." Contributing to this report were Times correspondents John Canalis,Christine Castro, Steve Carney, Chris Ceballos,Linn Groves,Jason Kandel,James Meier, Harrison Sheppard, Joseph Trevino and Lesley Wright • UPCOMING PROJECTS:A city-by-city list of maintenance priorities.B3 Copyrizht 1998 Los Angeles Times.All(tights Reserved Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ORANGEtt000089515.hbnl 10/2198 Keeping Manure in Its Place Pagel of 3 Newt ao ne Index ! ORANGE COUNTY NEWS HELP? Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Keeping Manure in Its Place ■Health: A program that rewards Inland Empire dairy farmers who compost is launched to help keep up quality of D.C.'s water supply. By LISA R/CHARD.SDN. Times SIaffWruer n a new campaign to protect the quality of Orange County's RELATED ],'drinking water supply, officials are offering discounts to Inland Empire dairy farmers who compost their cow manure rather O.C. SECTIONS than let it run off into the Santa Ana River. MAIN PAGE The money-for-manure program is aimed at reducing the amount of salt and nitrates flowing from the river into Orange NEWS BY County's aquifers, a problem that officials consider a long-term cOMMUtd177 threat to local ground water. SPORTS Trout and bass at an Anaheim fishing lake died in record numbers last March because of huge amounts of dairy runoff PREP SPORTS generated by El Niho storms. The Chino Basin Nitrate area of Riverside and San Bernardino counties is Problem BUSINESS home to 313,000 cows. They produce about Click hem for a 600,000 tons of manure that washes downstream araphi about LIFE&STYLE into Orange County annually, officials said. the manure CALENDAR The Orange County Water District is offering problem. financial incentives to farmers in an effort to Requires Adobe CALENDAR increase the use of a composting plant to dispose Acrobat Redder WEEKEND of the manure. The district has contributed HOIv1E DESIGN $175,000 that will be used to subsidize the price farmers pay for composting. CONQAENTARY For every wet ton of manure, the composting process will remove an estimated 154 pounds of salt. T.V.TINE 5 The immediate goal is to compost about 150,000 tons of manure by the end of the year and an additional 200,000 tons next year. "We'll be going full strength till the end of the year," said Gary Hackman, manager of processing for the Inland Empire Utilities ADVERTISEMENT Agency, which runs the composting facility. "It's going to be close, but we think we'll make it." The plant, amid the dairy farms in Chino, also processes tons of News liquid waste. Discharge of waste water into the Santa Ana River http://www.latimes.con-LIHONLE/NEWS/ORANGE/t000092981.htnd 10/20/98 Keeping Manure in Its Place Page 2 of 3 has also concerned Orange County water officials, but less so in recent years with the development of better sewer systems. Looking for an :'.i.>' Officials at the Milk Producer's Council, which represents about 'S. '.apartment? 120 Inland Empire farmers, said they expect to easily meet the water district's composting goals. Response to the project has been enthusiastic, said council executive director Robert Feenstra, and about 30 farmers have already agreed to compost their cow waste. Dairies average 700 to 800 cows per farm, Feenstra said, and one cow produces about 10 pounds of manure a day, or 1.5 tons a year. Many farmers have stockpiles of manure that they are unable to dispose. Cropland in Riverside and San Bernardino counties has diminished with increasing development, Feenstra said, reducing the demand for manure-based fertilizers. "The opportunity given the dairymen by Orange County and the Inland Empire Utilities has been a great help in removing the fertilizer from the dairy operation," he added. "We're going to be looking for every opportunity to completely remove all the livestock waste from the Chino Basin." Orange County Water District officials see the composting effort as only a short-term solution to the manure runoff problem, said spokesman Ron Wildermuth. The agency is asking the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Agriculture Department to inspect farms this winter to make sure they comply with laws prohibiting farmers from allowing manure to pile up, Wildermuth said. Officials stress that Orange County's ground water is now perfectly safe. But they fear water quality could suffer in the future if the manure problem isn't corrected. • ss Nitrate Problem Runoff from dairies, along with treated waste water from Riverside and other communities, is dumping nitrates into the Santa Ana River. The river, which flows through wetlands, past the Prado Dam and into Anaheim, is a main replenisher of Orange County's ground water basin, or aquifer. A closer look at the path: Dairy farms: Highest concentration of dairy cows in the United States North County ground water wells: High levels of nitrates found; water heavily diluted with nitrate-free water before being introduced into public water system, so tap water contains low levels or nitrates. Aquifers: River water diverted into holding ponds, where it percolates into aquifer, raising ground water levels. CopLigN 1998 Los Angcics Times. All Rights Reserved http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/OR.ANGE/t000092981.html 10/20/98 04- i lW40103 A�1►a1l�e�+_- a business news Or Flnkrtstia"Ifotvian .lv.. Concerns over water shared Filed: October 16, 1998 By STEVEN MAYER Calilomian staff writer e-mail:smavcnu bakcrsfidd.cnm American humorist Mark Twain once noted that while whiskey is made for drinking, water is made for fighting over. But at a state Senate water committee hearing held in Bakersfield Friday, environmental advocates were badly outnumbered by agricultural, water and urban interests—and fighting was virtually nonexistent. At the four-hour hearing held at the Kern County Water Agency's Bakersfield office, State Sen. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Water Resources, listened to testimony from a dozen farmers, water professionals and two environmental advocates. Costa was joined by California Assemblyman Mike Machado, D- Linden, and the committee's principal water consultant, Linda Adams. "California's current population of approximately 32 million is expected to grow to 47.5 million by the year 2020 and could surpass 50 million by the year 2025," Costa said in his opening remarks. "Along with that tremendous growth will be demands for additional water." Most of that new demand will come from urban residents, and water shortages in the valley by 2020 could be as much as 1.5 million acre feet in a drought year, Costa warned. The committee is in the process of attempting to develop a long range water policy for California. Costa asked witnesses to discuss their positions regarding the development of new water supplies, especially in the context of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. The CALFED program is a collaboration of state and federal agencies, water users and environmentalists. The group is examining water quality, supply and ecology issues in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River delta. "I think the San Joaquin Valley is headed for a big hit," said Howard Frick, member of the Bay-Delta Advisory Council and a board member of Western Growers Association. Frick said additional storage capacity through the development of new reservoirs or the expansion of current sites is imperative to any plan. But he complained that environmental groups are calling for more conservation from already water-efficient growers rather than endorsing new storage projects. "Almost nothing can be saved in the San Joaquin Valley regarding water use efficiency," Frick told the legislators. "You can't find guys doing a betterjob on water use efficiency than you can today." Frick's call for new water storage was echoed by Kern County Farm Bureau President Jim Crettol, Kern County Water Agency manager Tom Clark, Tim Quinn, deputy general manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and several other witnesses Friday. But Joe Caves, principal partner with The Nature Conservancy, said his group and other environmental groups will push for such "soft path" solutions as water conservation, recycling and reclamation. "We're certainly not going to support any new surface storage," Caves said. 'The fear is that additional storage will de-water streams and further stress an already stressed ecosystem—and the Delta can't take any more environmental stress." ® ® a Copyright©1998, The Bakersfield Californian I Email the Webmaster Associated Press Copyright Notice I Privacy Policy Statement Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 1998 oJN ANllgr� 9 x v Q 9 2L' O H Fcl'NTH EN�� O� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 OCSD. P.O.Eiox 8127• Fountain Valley,CA 927284127•(714)962-2411 Minutes for Board Meeting 09/23/98 Page 2 of 7 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on September 23, 1998, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Burnie Dunlap, Chair Glenn Parker X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller X Steve Anderson John Holmberg A Don Bankhead Jan Flory X George Brown Shawn Boyd X John Collins Laurann Cook X Jan Debay John E. Noyes X Barry Denes Richard A. Freschi X Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry A John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner X Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater X Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Eva Miner-Bradford Paul F. Walker A Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan A Margie Rice James V. Evans X Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts X Christina Shea Barry Hammond X William G. Steiner Todd Spitzer X Dave Sullivan Tom Harman X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates A Bob Zemel Tom Daly STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Colon; Mike Pelerman; Gary Slreed; Michelle Tuchman; Jim Herberg; Angie Anderson;Greg Mathews; Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Kalil Bum-Lucht;Tom Dawes; Kris Lindstrom; Bill Knopf; Phil Stone Minutes for Board Meeting 09/23/98 'yr Page 3 of 7 REPORT OF THE CHAIR The Chair reported that the committee meetings for the month of October had been rearranged due to a conflict with the League of Cities meeting, as follows: Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee—October 14 at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design and Construction Committee—October 8 at 5:30 p.m. Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee—October 21 at 5:30 p.m. Chair Dunlap further reported that the November meetings would be according to the usual schedule. However, the November Board meeting will be held on November 18 because of the Thanksgiving holiday, and the December Board meeting will be held on December 16 because of the Christmas holiday. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 26, 1998, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits"A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: O8105/98 08/19/98 Totals $1,691,228.32 $2 342,681.13 CONSENTCALENDAR 9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve the 1994 Amendment to the National Water Research Institute (NWRI)Joint Powers Agreement which did not undergo official Board action or approval due to an NWRI oversight; and 2) Approve Amendments No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 to the 1994 Amendment to the NWRI Joint Powers Agreement. 10. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Sewer Service Agreement with the City of La Habra and City of La Habra Heights to provide sewer service re Tract 46591, in form approved by the General Counsel. 11. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Sewer Service Agreement with Los Angeles County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District and Shea Homes to provide sewer service, in form approved by the General Counsel. 12. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, a Public Joint Powers Agency v. David E. and Joyce R. Griswold, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 797439, in connection with eminent domain acquisition of Parcel No. 300290-1, including sewer easement owned by the District in the vicinity of Jamboree Road and Barranca Parkway in the City of Irvine; and 2) authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. Minutes for Board Meeting 09/23/98 Page 4 of 7 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 14. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the September 23, 1998 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 26, 1998 to be filed. 15. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the September 2, 1998 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 2, 1998 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve an amendment to the Lease Amendment(Specification No. L-009-1)with Seaside Financial Corporation, for 18.09 acres of land at the northeast comer of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the city of Fountain Valley, for one year. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Advanced Engine Technology Corporation (AETC)to provide engineering services to design, install and certify a Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines, for an amount not to exceed $342,000; and, MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with a source-testing firm to provide air emissions monitoring in support of installation of the Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines for an amount not to exceed $95,000. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Schreiber Corporation to provide a Fuzzy Filter° unit for a one-year lest for an amount not to exceed $150,000. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Data Solutions Group, LLC for the development of a written implementation plan, purchase of off-the-shelf software, and customization, population, and commissioning of the Air Quality Information Management System (AIMS), for an amount not to exceed $127,000. Minutes for Board Meeting 09/23/98 Page 5 of 7 16. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re the meeting held on September 3, 1998 summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 3, 1998 to be filed. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Spec Services for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, for a total amount not to exceed $2,121,748. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. 131-37,for a total amount not to exceed $1,993,000. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Area Classification Studies for Plants No. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35, for a total amount not to exceed $488,600. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1)Approve plans and specifications for the Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Fountain Valley Channel to Orangethorpe Avenue; Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue; and Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Marian Sewer to Carbon Creek Channel, Contract No. 2-34R; and 2)Approve a budget amendment of$325,000 for a total project budget of$1,390,600. 17. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee re the meeting held on September 9, 1998 summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 9, 1998 to be fled. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of August 1998. d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Ouartedy Investment Management Program Report for the period April 1, 1998 through June 30, 1998. Minutes for Board Meeting 09/23/98 Page 6 of 7 17. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file FY 1997-98 End of Year Operational Report for the period ending June 30, 1998. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve the following revised rates for flow, BOD and suspended solids for Class I and Class II Source Control Permit Users: Proposed Rates Zone Flow SOD Solids per MG Per 10001E per 10009 1 271.08 223.D4 213.39 2 208.07 171.19 163.79 3 212.28 174.66 167.11 5 237.59 195.48 187.03 6 222.13 182.76 174.86 7 188.70 138.81 132.80 11 224.94 185.07 177.07 13 281.17 231.34 221.34 18. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Receive and file Staff Report dated September 23, 1998; and, 2) Direct Staff to proceed with preparation of the Strategic Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (Job No. J-40-4), designating the preferred alternative as follows: 1. Level of Treatment • Discharge a blend of primary and secondary effluent to meet the requirements of our 1998 ocean discharge permit. 2. Water Reclamation • Participate in Phase 1 of Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR System)with the Orange County Water District and contribute up to $125 million (50%) of the capital cost. 3. Peak Flow Management • Utilize existing in-plant storage to mitigate peak flows; • Participate in Phase 1 of the GWR System to provide 100 mgd of peak wet weather flow relief, and 50 mgd average daily flow; • Rely on the 78-inch outfall for emergency discharge of secondary effluent at an estimated frequency of once every 3 years by the year 2020. Minutes for Board Meeting 09/23/98 Page 7 of 7 19. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: The Board convened in closed session at 7:34 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. The Board did not consider Item No. 19(a)(2), and no report was given on that item. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item No. 19(a)(1). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 7:43 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:43 p.m. r� Secretary� a Boa of cvrs of Orange C ty Sanitatl�istrial H:\wp.&al dminOSWinu[e 92398.DRAFT.dw Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid SI5/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13073 The Vantage Group.Inc. $27,843.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programing Project 13074 Barclays Bank PLC $93.820.10 COP Letter of Credit 13075 Duke Energy Trading 8 Marketing $111,825.44 Natural Gas 13076 Forts Benefits Insurance Comp $35,647.34 Long Term Disability Premium 13077 Harbour Engineering Group $53,424.35 Mechanical Paris 13078 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan $25,318.34 Medical Insurance Premium 13079 Mike Silbermann Co. $31,989.75 Contractual Service for Repair of Sewer Lines 13080 NETG(National Education Training Group) $27,476.25 Subscription Library Rental 13081 Pack Investment Management Co. $123.430.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 13082 Padficare of Ca $35,051.49 Health Insurance Premium 13083 Pima Gro Systems Inc $76.266.92 Residuals Removal NO 3-29-95 13084 Sopp Chevrolet $48,071.59 Vehicle Purchase 13085 Southern California Edison $70,374.26 Parer 13086 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms $46,386.67 Residuals Removal Spec#P-157 13087 Margate Construction Inc. $288,350.21 Construction PI-36-2 13088 Systems Integrated $112.366.54 Professional Services-J-3" 13089 Amedmn Telephone 8 Telegraph $28.05 Long Distance Telephone Services 13090 American Telephone 8 Telegraph $6.182.17 Long Distance Telephone Services 13091 American Telephone 8 Telegraph $32.70 Long Distance Telephone Services t.1 13092 AT&T $943.77 Long Distance Telephone Services % 13093 A-Plus Systems $9,184.93 Notices 8 Ads 13094 Abresive Engineering Tool&Equipment $228.77 Hardware N 13095 Aides Systems,Inc. $468.76 Engine Supplies 13098 Allied Supply Co. $790.00 Training Expense > 13097 Amedcan Management Association $390.00 Seminar Registrations/Subscription 130M American Precision Industries $1,196.11 Mechanical Pads 13099 Angle Anderson $282.00 Training Expense Reimb. 13100 Blake Anderson $607.97 Meeting&Cellular Telephone Expense Reimb. 13101 Angelus Engine Center $106.14 Truck Supplies 13102 Anicom,Inc. $414 00 Electrical Pads&Supplies 13103 Anthony Past Control,Inc. $10150 Service Agreement 13104 Arens Industries Inc. $3.491.10 Instrument Supplies 13105 Asbury Environmental Services $55,00 Waste Oil Removal 13106 Ashrsa $32.00 Publication 13107 Atlantic Pool Care $235.00 Service Agreement 13108 AMAUPedgefi-Thompson $149.00 Training Expense 13109 American Seals West $448.72 Gaskets 13110 American Petroleum Institute $249.45 Publication 13111 ASIS $690.00 Training Expense 13112 Shabbir S.Basrai $653.25 Meeting Expense Reimb. 13113 Bauer Compressors $116.24 Compressor Supplies 13114 Beckman Coulter $995.00 Officer Supplies 13115 Bernadette D.Berdes $883.98 Technical Service Position Exp.Reimb. 13116 BRSC(Blosolids Reorders of So.Cal.) $1,0D0.00 Membership 13117 Somers Associates $1.532.05 Pretreatment Automation Study 13118 Eva M.Bradford $550.00 CASA Expense Reimb. 13119 Bristol Systems, Inc. $3,200.00 Consulting Services-Y2K Project 13120 Bryant&Associates $3,000.00 Consulting Services-Integrated Assets Protection Plan 13121 Burke Engineering Co. $75.48 Electrical Supplies Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 815198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13122 Burlington Safety Laboratory $199,00 Testing Services 13123 Ben Franklin Crafts $3048 Awards 13124 BNI Building News $363 93 Subscription 13125 C.P.I.(Cal6.Pipeline Inspection) $2,586.02 Lab Supplies 13126 C.S.D.F.Foundation $8,750.00 Professional Services-Demographic Research 13127 Calif Cantdfugal Pump $546,99 Electrical Services 13128 California Auto Refrigeration $562.22 Servica Agreement 13129 California Journal $39.95 Publication 13130 Calolympic Safety $629A8 Safety Supplies 13131 Callroi,Inc. $6.974.64 Hardware 13132 Centrepointe Commercial Interior $1,698.14 Once Furniture 13133 Century Paint $541.77 Paint Supplies 13134 Clayton Group Services,Inc. $12,777.87 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 13135 Coast Fire Equipment $447 87 Service Agreement 13136 Computers America,Inc. $865.88 Computer Supplies 13137 Compusa,Inc. $1,594.72 Computer Software 13138 Connell GM Pads $79.23 Truck Supplies 13139 Consolidated Electrical Distribution $1.571.10 Electrical Supplies 13140 Consolidated Freightways $637.97 Freight 13141 Consolidated Plastics Company $543.78 Tools 13142 Construction Fabricators Inc. $2.543.98 Construction Services-Repair of$1 North Grit Auger 13143 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co $1,377.67 Plumbing Supplies 131" Converse Consultants $561.50 Consulting Services MO B-11-93 M 13145 Core Laboratories, Inc $400.00 Soil Testing y 13146 Corporate Express $1,823.88 Office,Supplies N 13147 Cost Containment Solutions $1,168.08 Worker's Compensation Services 13148 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $131A5 Truck Parts 13149 Orange County Sanitation District $2D.03 Petty Cash Reims. 13150 County Wholesale Electric Co. E66.81 Electrical Supplies 13151 CSM Metal Fabricating&Engine $851.23 Truck Supplies 13152 Janlca Debay $340.00 CASA Expense Reimb. 13153 Dal Mar Analytical $610.00 Blosollds Analysis 13164 Dell Marketing L.P. $14,334.14 Computers 13155 Delta Foam Products $159.30 Lab Pads&Supplies 13156 Design Automation $236.50 Computer Software 13157 DeZunck $8,162.D6 Valves 13150 Discount Laser $305.01 Computer Printer Supplies 13159 Dover Elevator Company $1.203.60 Elevator Maintenance 13160 Dunn-Edwards Corporation $250.41 Paint Supplies 13161 Eagle Distribution $50.99 Auto Supplies 13182 Enchanter,Inc. $4.900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 13163 Enelteoh $24.25 Freight Charges 13164 Enterprise Technologies $11.080.50 FIS Implementation Consulting Services 13165 Environmental Management Consulting $3.625.97 Professional Services-Troubleshooting for Packed Tower 13166 Environmental Sampling Supply $359.68 Lab Pads&Supplies 13167 Experian $132.25 Orange County Property Information 13168 ESP Industries,Inc. $163.06 Mechanical Supplies 13169 Federal Express Corp. 5MAS Air Freight 13170 Fibartron $1,076.29 Fiber Opllc Cable Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid W5I98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13171 Finnigan Corp $11,000.00 Service Agreement 13172 Fisher Scientific $641.20 Lab Supplies 13173 Flo-Systems,Inc. $4,019.84 Pump Supplies 13174 Fountain Valley Camera $105.36 Photo Supplies 13175 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash $391.50 Truck Wash Tickets 13176 City of Fountain Valley $15.203.04 Water Use 13177 Franklin Covey $177.68 Office Supplies 13178 Fry's Electronics $2,484.30 Employee Computer Loan Frogman 13179 City of Fullerton $195.35 Water Use 13180 Ganehl Lumber Company $107.98 Lumber/Hardware 13181 So.Cal.Gas Company $812.61 Natural Gas 13182 GTE California $2,075.03 Telephone Services 13183 George Yardley Co. $1,818.22 Lab Supplies 13184 Getiige Castle $604.97 Pump Supplies 13186 Giedich-Mitchell,lna $9.679.63 Pump Supplies 13166 Goldenwast Window Service $1.658.00 Window Cleaning Service 13107 W W Grainger Inc. $616.71 Compressor Supplies 13188 Graphic Distributors $311.50 Photographic Supplies 13189 Greseby,STl $2,674.89 Engine Supplies 13190 Greet American Printing Co S4A71.57 Printing 13191 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $754.58 Janitorial Supplies 13192 GS Edwards Systems Technology $170.00 Alann Service Call h 13193 GST,Inc.7 Micro City $4,993.20 Office Supplies 13194 Harder Equipment Company $105.97 Truck Supplies 13195 Hach Company $142.66 Lab Supplies w 13196 Kevin L.Haddon $465.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 13197 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery 8 Deli 5203.50 Directors Meeting Expense 13198 HewIe6-Packard $323.25 Service Agreement 13199 Hoerbiger Service Inc $1,182.59 Compressor Parts 13200 The Holman Group $752.60 EAP Premium 13201 Home Depot $644.24 Small Hardware 13202 Hub Auto Supply $260.82 Track Parts 13203 City of Huntington Beach $13.014.36 Water Use 13204 Ideas for You,Inc. $043.03 O.C.Fair Items 13206 file. $748.59 Lab Pads 5 Supplies 13206 Imaging Plus,Inc $1.469.99 Office Supplies 13207 Industrial Threaded Products, $736.69 Connectors 13208 Information Resources $300.00 Personnel Services 13209 Inland Empire Equipment,Inc $2.227.75 Tmck Supplies 13210 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $23.92 Water Use 13211 Irvine Sci-Tech Books $81.85 Subscription 13212 IPCOSafely-Ca $1,895.31 Safety Supplies 13213 ISCO,Ina $764.34 Lab Services 13214 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $2,11".49 Instrument Supplies 13215 Jay's Catering $516.22 Directors Meeting Expense 13216 Jensen Instruments Co. $614.64 Gauge 13217 Jim's Suspension Service $5D.00 Truck Repairs 13210 Johnstone Supply $47.73 Electrical Supplies 13219 Joint Inntmmentation Committee $120.00 Seminar Registration Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 815198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13220 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. $1,437.50 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 13221 Kato Engineering $5,913.80 Electrical Parts&Supplies 13222 Knox Industrial Supplies $1.207.10 Tools 13223 Lab Safety SupplyInn $2.816.03 Safety Supplies 13224 Lab Support $664.00 Temporary Employment Services 13225 Lab Systems $6,55D.00 Chromatography Server&Acquisition Licenses 13226 Layette Company $56D.71 Sulfide Test Kit 13227 Leadership Directories,Inc. $661.00 Subscriplion 13228 Liquid Handling Systems $356.78 Mechanical Supplies 13229 LA Cellular Telephone Company 52,013.67 Cellular Telephone Service 13230 LHI $50.00 Computer Software 13231 Maintenance Products,Inc. $7,778.00 Mechanical Supplies 13232 Maintenance Technology Corp. $4,638.20 Welding Supplies 13233 Mar Vac Electronics $375.06 Instrument Supplies 13234 Dan Meurer $3,150.00 Consulting Services-Ocean Monitoring Program 13235 McKenna Engineering&Equipment $5.540.58 Pump Supplies 13238 MCMasler-Carr Supply Co. $377.16 Tools 13237 Measurement Variables,Inc. $203.52 Filters 13238 Medlin Controls Co. $5,007.28 Instrument Supplies 13239 Mallon Trust $16,677.04 Investment Custodian Bank 13240 Mesa Muf0er $255.44 Truck Supplies 13241 Micro Flex $304.00 Gloves f„ 13242 Midway Mfg B Machining Co $5.593.38 Mechanical Repairs 4 13243 Mission Uniform Service $4,991.96 Uniform Rentals yy 13244 Moore Business Forms&Systems $1,612.30 Office Supplies ,Tp 13245 MoloPhoto $225.36 Photographic Services 13245 MGD Technologies,Inc. $1,000.00 Maintenance Agreement 13247 MPS Photographic Services $356.48 Office Supplies 13248 National Assoc.of Regional Co $75.00 Training Video 13249 National Mlcrocomp Services $2,045.00 Service Agreement 1325D National Plant Services,Inc. $2,145.50 Vacuum Truck Services 13251 Neal Supply Co $069.97 Plumbing Supplies 13252 Nelson Marketing $1,877.21 O.C.Fair Items 13263 Newark Electronics $304.10 Instrument Supplies 13254 City of Newport Beach $109.10 Water Use 13255 Newport Electronics,Inc $986.86 Electrical Pads&Supplies 13268 The Norco Companies $127.00 Mail Delivery Service 13257 Northwestern Carbon $1.389.56 Filters 13258 Office Depot Business Services .$1,126.99 Office Supplies 13259 Orange County Wholesale Electric $535.77 Instrument Supplies 13200 Orke r Co. 3695.51 Pump Supplies 13261 Orrick,Herrington&Sutcliffe $1.821.05 Arbitrage Rebate Compliance Services 13262 Oxygen Service Company $1.143.72 Specialty Gases 13263 OCB Reprographics $7.248.97 Blueprints&Photocopying,Spec Is P-173 13264 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. $290.51 Electrical Supplies 13255 Pacific Bell $1.224.36 Telephone Services 13266 Pacific Mechanical Supply $193.78 Plumbing Supplies 13267 Pacific Pans and Controls,Inc. $2,750.21 Instrument Supplies 13260 Parkhouse Tire Inc $478.69 Tires Orange County Sanitation District - Clehrls Paid 85M Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13269 Parts Unlimited $332.15 Truck Supplies 13270 Performance Training Associates $395.00 Training Expense 13271 Petro Animal Supplies 564.64 Lab Supplies 13272 PC]: Poly-Comindusides $2.302.19 Janitorial Supplies 13273 Pod Supply $359.83 Rope 13274 Power Pumps,Inc. $2,812.20 Pump Supplies 13275 Harold Primrox Ice 548.00 Ice 13276 Pumping Solutions Inc. $4.102.58 Mechanical Supplies 13277 PSI Furellmenl $249.00 Computer Software 13278 R 8 R Instmmmtation,Inc. $1,081.59 Electrical Supplies 13279 Red Wing Shoes $151.71 Reimbursable Safely Shoes 13280 Riordan 8 MMnzie $1.972.00 Legal Services 13281 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop $223.10 Auto Repair 13282 RJN Group,Inc. $5,142.50 CMMS Consulting Services 13283 RM Controls 5447.33 Instrument Supplies 13284 RMS Engineering$Design, Inc $13,532.00 Engineering Services 13285 RPM Electric Motors $5,317.11 Electric Motor Supplies 13286 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $2.726.09 Specialty Gases 13287 Sea Coast Designs,Inc. $66.00 Lab Supplies 13286 SecondSun $858.22 Light Fixtures 13289 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $43.10 Tools 13290 Shureluck Sales B Engineering $1,637.22 Tcalsniardwane M 13291 Siemon,Larsen B Marsh $5.000.00 Professional Services-Shared Govemance 13292 Sievers $290.00 Lab Supplies N13293 SkillPath Seminars $89.00 On-Site Training 13294 Smith Pipe 8 Supply Inc. $393.37 Plumbing Supplies 13295 Soca-Lynch Corp. $74.48 Janitorial Services 13296 South Coast Water $35.00 Office Supplies 13297 Southern California SETAC $75.00 Training Expense 13298 Soulhweat Scientific Inc. $1.260.68 Instrument Supplies 13299 Spax Ceriprep Inc. $72.38 Lab Supplies 13300 Strata International,Inc. 5926.98 Chemicals 13301 Summit Steel $5.123.27 Metal 13302 Sunset Ford $445.57 Truck Supplies 133D3 Super Power Products $193.95 Janitorial Supplies 13304 Taylor-Dunn 5542.43 Electric Cad Pads 13305 Titan Power,Inc. $23.350.00 Maintenance Agreement 13306 Aerofund Financia0fop Hat Productions $627.54 Director's Meeting Expense 13307 Trl-Stale Seminar On-the-River $280.00 Seminar Registration 13308 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. $205.07 Tmck Supplies 13309 TCH Associates,Inc. $90D.86 Lab Supplies 13310 Ultra Scientific $490.83 Lab Supplies 13311 United Pumping Service $910.00 Emergency Vacuum Service 8 Spill Containment 13312 Valley Cities Supply Company $2.915.00 Plumbing Supplies 13313 Vision Service Plan-(CA) $7.629.30 Vision Service Premium 13314 Vossler B Company $937.37 Mechanical Supplies 13315 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $2,702.37 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification NO:C-D" 13316 VWR Scientific Products $11,205.32 Lab Supplies 13317 Water Environment Federation $13.30 Professional Development Courses Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8/5198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13318 Winds Sanitary Supply $125.42 Janitorial Supplies 13319 Wayne Electric Co. $543.07 Electrical Supplies 13320 Whessoe Verse,Inc. $3.537.40 Valves 13321 WEFTEC'98 $655.00 Conference Registration 13322 Xerox Corporation $8,489.49 Copier Leases 13323 2011h,Century Plastics Inc $322.59 Office Supplies 13324 Clasen Construction $13.347.00 Construction Contract 8 P2-39-1 13325 Donald F.McIntyre $1.753.94 Meeting Expense Relmb. 13326 Michael D.Moore $1.122.92 Meeting Expense Relmb. 13327 Daniel E.Tunniclik $246.34 Meeting Expense Relmb. 13328 Orange County Sanitation District $530.99 Petty Cash Relmb. 13329 Internal Revenue Service $178.95 Rebate Liability Interest Payment 13330 Margie Rice $340.00 CASE Expense Relmb. 13331 Internal Revenue Service $3.200.00 Rebate Liability Payment $1.691,228.32 N rt 3+ rr P Oren9e County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8/19/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13408 Aluminum Precision $34,20.18 Office Supplies 13409 Atlas Chrysler Plymouth $60,088.79 Vehicles Purchased-3 Dodge Trucks 13410 Dell Marketing L.P. $104.155.45 32 Pentium 11400 MMX/266 Computers for 220.230,520,720.820,910,920 13411 Della Dental $39,225.04 Dental Insurance Plan 13412 Gierlich-Mitchell,Inc. $68.211.33 Pump Supplies 13413 Lee&Ro Inc $31,065.62 Engineering Services-P1.40-1,P1.47,P247-1,P2-39 13414 Mladen Bunlich Construction Co. $486,093.60 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 13416 Orange County Flood Control District $109,000.00 Service Contract,MO 2-25-98 13416 Orange County Water District $71,664.00 Green Acres Prefect Agreement 13417 Palnewebber Incorporated $60,188.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 13418 Pima Gro Systems Inc $146,392.94 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 13419 Southern California Edison $45,099.26 Power 13420 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $124,112.70 Construction 74-1 13421 Tula RanchlMa9an Farms $53.765.85 Residuals Removal Spec a P-157 13422 United HealthCare/Metro Health $133,814.75 Medical Health Insurance 13423 AManco Constructors Inc $258.527.70 Construction J-34-1,P2-35-5 13424 Alrpoi Construction,Inc. $70,786.89 Construction P1-51R 13426 CNA Trust $28.725.30 Construction Contract e541-1 13426 A&D Party Rentals $719.50 All Hands Meeting Supplies 13427 American Telephone&Telegraph $1.56 Long Distance Telephone Services 13428 Air Products&Chemicals $22.500.00 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen.Syt MO 8-8-09 13429 Airborne Express $152.78 Air Freight 13430 Allee Construction Company $9.005.00 Service Contract,P2 floor Installation 13431 Allied Supply Co. $9,609.60 Plumbing Supplies 13432 Allied Supply $395.00 Training Expense �-' 13433 American Airlines $6,116.39 Travel Services 13434 American Management Association $150.00 Seminar ReglstretionslSubscriptlon 13435 Anicem,Inc. $728.46 Electrical Pam&Supplies 13436 Appleone Employment Service $1,104.00 Temporary Employment Services 13437 Applied Industrial Technology $180.98 Pump Supplies 13436 Armor-Vac $1,050.00 Vacuum Truck Services 13439 Ares Disposal Service,Inc. $620.80 Toxic Waste Removal 13440 Awards&Trophies By Bea $80.49 Plaques 13441 Assoc of Metro.Sewerage Agencies $650.00 Training Registration 13442 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $4,246.29 Telephone Installation 13443 Barclays Law Publishers $60.00 Subscription 13444 Layne T.Baroidi $906.25 Meeting Expense Relmb. 13445 Battery Speclailles $652.83 Batteries 13446 Ben Franklin Crafts $156.62 Award 13447 Blo Gro Division $500.32 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 13448 Bristol Systems,Inc. $4,400.00 Consulting Service-Y21K Protect 13449 Bureau of National Affairs $1.090.14 Subscription 13450 Burlington Safety Laboratory $199.00 Testing Services 13451 BASF Corporation $335.00 Janitorial Supplies 13452 Cal South Industrial $8N.38 Calibrate/Repair Digital Crane Scale 13453 California Auto Refrigeration $371.66 Service Agreement 13454 California Automatic Gate $91 Maintenance Agreement-9 Automatic Gates PI &P2 13455 Cablymplc Safety $872.47 Safety Supplies 13458 Ceftrol,Inc. 31.315.43 Hardware Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8119198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13457 Carleton Engineers&Consultants $1,211.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality 13458 Carollo Engineers $3,216.15 Engineering Services MO 5-12-93 13459 Centrepointe Commercial Interior $172.40 Office Furniture 13460 Chem-Dry Of Huntington Beach $470.00 Service Agreement 13461 CirwO World $3.00D.00 Office Supplies 13462 Cole,Inc. $10.00 Workshop Registration 13463 Computers America,Inc. $251.09 Computer Supplies 13464 Consolidated Electrical Distribution $3,577.95 Electrical Supplies 13465 Continental-McLaughlin $225.74 Tools 13466 Cooper Cameron Corporation $1.761.76 Engine Supplies 13467 Corporate Express $79322 Office Supplies 13468 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $224.59 Truck Paris 13469 County of Orange $2.232.25 Underground Tank Fee 13470 Crime Pro Services $2.046.50 Maintenance Agreement 13471 Crystal Glass&Mirror $6,870.00 Instalation of New Doors P2 Control Center 13472 Culligan Water Conditioning $30.00 Soft Water Service 13473 CPI $394.60 Lab Supplies 13474 DeZurich $3.850.99 Valves 13475 DGA Consultants,Inc. $4,349.89 Surveying Services NO 8-8-94 13476 Eagle Distribution $29.16 Auto Supplies 13477 Electra Bond,Inc $6.589.96 Mechanical Supplies 13478 Enchanter,Inc. $3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 f.. 13479 Environmental Resources Assod $1,159.80 Lab Services rr 13480 Evergreen $30.00 Mechanical Paris Degreaser m 13481 Federal Express $101.60 Air Freight N 13482 Fountain Valley Camera $10A3 Photo Supplies 13483 Foxboro Company $1,073.00 Instrument Supplies 13484 Franklin Covey $1.523.57 Office Supplies 13485 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering $197.72 Paint Supplies 13486 Fry's Electronics $705.74 Employee Computer loan Program 13487 FM International,Inc. $4.950.00 Service Agreement 13488 So.Cal.Gas Company 52.985.12 Natural Gas 13489 GTE California $7.233.75 Telephone Services 13490 George Yardley Co. $1.566.88 Lab Supplies 13491 Georgetown Publishing House $97.00 Subscription 13492 Gad Lopker&Associates $10.500.00 Consulting Service-Customer Expectations Focus Group 13493 Getinge Castle $1.382.99 Pump Supplies 13494 Graphic Distributors $2,140.73 Photographic Supplies 13495 Great American Printing Co $5,565.74 Printing 13496 GBC(General Binding Corp) $247.60 Maintenance Agreement 13497 GS Edwards Systems Technology $5,475.00 Service Maintenance Agreement 13498 GST,Inc I Micro City $8,960.49 Office Supplies 13499 Harold Primrose Ice $144.00 Ice 13500 Hewlett-Packard $129A4 Service Agreement 13501 Hcerbiger Service Inc $50237 Compressor Pans 13502 Home Depot $99.31 Small Hardware 13503 Idexx $2,807.85 Lab Pads&Supplies 13504 Imaging Plus,Inc $777.00 Office Supplies 13505 Industrial Threaded Products $T7.43 Connectors Orange County Sanitation District + Claims Paid 8/19MS Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13506 Infilce Degremord,Inc. $924.89 Mechanical Parts 8 Supplies 13507 Inland Empire Equipment,Inc. $363.45 Truck SupptWa 13508 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $186.87 Lab Supplies 135M Inside CAL/EPA $535.00 Subscription 13510 Intl Risk Mind.Institute,Inc. $59.96 Publications 13511 Interstate Battery Systems $805.33 Batteries 13512 Irvine Photo Graphics $13.38 Photographic Services 13513 IPCO Safety-Ca $1,491,37 Safety Supplies 13514 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $970.29 Instrument Supplies 13515 Jay's Catering $469.42 Direclofs Meeting Expense 13516 Job.Available Inc. $288,00 Notices&Ads 13517 Johnstone Supply $893.74 Electrical Supplies 13518 Kehl Scientific Instruments 54,212.95 Semi Drive 13510 Kolar Corp $343.94 Training Materials 13520 Kelly Paper $44.47 Paper 13521 Knox Industrial Supplies $2.573.53 Tools 13522 Lab Safety Supply,lnc. $311.79 Safety Supplies 13623 League Of Califomla Cities $50.00 Conference Registration 13524 Lord Fleming Architects,Inc $4.680.00 Archilecturel Services-P1.407,MO 9-24-97 13525 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers. $15.088.60 Engineering Services 2-37 13526 Maintenance Superintendents Assoc. $70.00 Membership 13527 Maintenance Troubleshooting $32.50 Publications 13528 Mamco International $136.61 Maintenance Supplies rT 13529 Mandic Motors $275.00 Towing Services tt00 13530 Masters Company $132.65 Safety Supplies u 13531 Don Maurer $3.150.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 13532 MC Junkln Corp $8,974.60 Plumbing Supplies 13533 McMaster-Carr Supply Co, $155.69 Tools 13534 Medlin Controls Co. $264.22 Instrument Supplies 13535 Metier,Inc $000.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Data Integration Pmject 13536 Mlcm Flex $900.00 Gloves 13537 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co. $7.370.00 Mechanical Repairs 13538 Mission Uniform Service $3.371.72 Uniform Rentals 13539 Mission $1,594.70 Maintenance Supplies 13540 MoloPhoto $109.95 Photographic Services 13541 MGD Technologies,Inc. $1,000.00 Maintenance Agreement 13542 MPS Photographic Services $52.26 Office Supplies 13543 National MW=mp Services $2,045.00 Service Agreement 13544 NaOink Ltd. $1.792.97 Communications Equipment 13545 New Horizons Computer Looming $1.275.00 Software Training Classes 13546 Newark Electronics $22,220.16 Instrument Supplies 13547 NCSS Statistical Software $256.95 Computer Software 13548 Office Depot Business Services $2.019.51 Office Supplies 13549 Office Pavillion $20.544.70 Office Furniture Repairs 13550 Orange Coast Pipe Supply $91.94 Plumbing Supplies 13551 Orange County EMA $723.00 County Service Fee 13552 Orange County Forum $450.00 Conference Registration 13553 Orange County Wholesale Electric $212.17 Instrument Supplies 13554 Oxygen Service Company $2,060.01 Spectafty Gases Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8/19198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13555 OCV Control Valves $1,004.28 Mechanical Pads 8 Supplies 13556 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. $376.06 Electrical Supplies 13557 Pacific Bell $1.151.50 Telephone Services 13558 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2.534.84 Plumbing Supplies 13559 Pacific Pads and Controls,Inc. $270.82 Instrument Supplies 13560 Padre Janitorial Supplies $34.67 Janitorial Supplies 13561 Parkhouse Tire Inc $1.155.08 Time 13562 Perkin Elmer Service $717.50 Filters 13563 Perkin-Elmer Corp. $746.05 Fillers 13564 Petco Animal Supplies $100.13 Lab Supplies 13595 Pinkerton Systems Integration $10.240.00 Computer Supplies 13566 Pitney Bowes $374.43 Postage Machine Service Agreement 13567 Style Dining Inc. $435.86 Permit Fee Refund 13568 Fluid Components,International $4,00687 Instrument Supplies 13569 Public Risk Management Assoc. $28.50 Membership 13570 PCS Express $462.60 Courier Service 13571 Rellastar $24,584.21 Life Insurance Premium 13572 Rellastar Bankers Security Life $4,888.64 Life Insurance Premium 13573 RJN Group,Inc. $9,552.25 CMMS Consulting Services 13574 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. $121.11 Paint Supplies 13575 Safelite Glass Corp. $466.54 Auto Supplies 13576 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $52.08 Tools N. 13577 Shufeluck Sales 8 Engineering $96.80 Tools/Hardware rT 13578 Snap-On Incorporated $130.67 Tools lid 13579 So Coast Air Duality Management $321A0 Pump Supplies 13580 Southern California Edison $7,329.05 Power 13581 Space Leasing Company $18,398.90 Construction Trailers P2-70 13582 State Board Of Equalization $280.00 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 13583 Sterling Ad $64.85 Ad Supplies 13584 Summit Steel 1273.69 Metal 13585 Time Werner Communications $40.47 Cable Services 13586 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $570.00 Lab Services 13587 Vertex Business Systems $977.50 Office Furniture 13588 The Wackenhut Corporation $6.083.04 Security Guards 13589 Water Environment Federation $1.050.00 Professional Development Courses 13590 Western Business Systems $510.14 051ca Supplies 13591 The Willing Company $7.500.00 Professional Services-Development of a Public Ocean Booklet 13592 WESTCAS $2,200.00 ULFT Mailers 13593 3 Com Corporation $61.72 Training Registration 13594 Donald F.McIntyre $330.00 Meeting Expense Reimb 13595 Samuel L.Mowbrey $319.18 Meeting Expense Reimb 13596 Michelle Tuchmen $19.73 Cellular Telephone Cells Reimb. 13597 Allied Supply $395.00 Training Expense 13598 Orange County Sanitation District $447.78 Pally Cash Relmb. 13599 Michelle Tuchman $341.13 O.C.Fair Appreciation Dinner Expense Reimb. 13600 Bristol Systems,Inc. $5,350.00 Consulting Services 13601 Moreland 8 Associates $7,011.00 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 $2,342,681.13 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeenngDae I Tozoizeea.iveofDir. - AGENDA REPORT 1tem Nufter I fterok�pmeer Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. SUMMARY See attached listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A NM,W fa1\wp ABVinV3PapgpelWirRESlrlamua4 0. a�. ygys Page 1 ATTACHMENTS r 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 8131/98, 9/16/98 & 9/30/98. BA vwo�wuiwoo-v�vzoauageawrnesmm. aaax am:e snv,a Page 2 Orange County Sanitation District ` Claims Paid 8131/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13660 The Vantage Group,Inc. $25,785.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 13651 Advance Constructors Inc. $107,897.00 Construction J-34-1,P2-35.5 13652 Blo Gro Division $25,735.28 Residuals Removal MO 4-28-95 13853 Boyle Engineering Corporation $25,557.11) Engineering Services 7.23 13654 Burch Ford $73,630.52 Vehicles Purchased-4-1998 Ford Taurus Sedans 13666 Carollo Engineers $160,207.88 Engineering Services 13655 Dell Marketing L.P. $33,333.01 9-Micm,compulers&2 Printers for Divisions 510,520.490 13557 Gledich-Mitchell,Inc. $31,097.52 Pump Supplies 13858 James Martin&Co. $91,015.01) Data Integration Project 13659 Kemimn Pacific,Inc. $83.772.59 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 13660 Margate Construction Inc. $168,851.96 Construction P7-36-2 13661 Pima Gro Systems Inc $154,592.05 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 13662 Science Applications Intl..Corp. $61,488.16 Ocean Monitoring MO6-8-94 13663 Southern California Edison $71,862.12 Power 13664 Tula RanclJMagan Farms 548,912.98 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 13665 Waste.States Chemical Inc. $36,720.9D Caustic Soda Solution MO 8.23-95 136N Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart $72,659.71 Legal Services MO 7.26.95 13667 Sverdmp Civil,Inc. $1.164,804.43 Construction 7-7-1 13668 Systems Integrated $31.600.00 Professional Somices-J-31-3 13659 Advanced Cooling Technologies $195.54 Electric Pads 13670 Air Products and Chemicals $23.289.95 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen System MO 8-8-89 13671 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. $3,254.05 Manhole Frames&Covers 13672 Allied Supply $4,788.37 Plumbing Supplies 13673 Almege Environmental&Technical $32D.00 Emissions Source Testing of Combustion&Portable Engines 13574 American Sigma,Inc. $4,006.87 Instrumentation Parts&Supplies 13675 American Training Resources,Inc. $1,074.81 Training Materials 13676 Blake Anderson $168.97 Meeting Expense Raimb 13677 Anioom,Inc. $SB4.05 Electrical Pads&Supplies 13678 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $930.00 Service Agreement 13679 Appleone Employment Service $9,25160 Temporary Employment Services 13680 Applied Industrial Technology $2.643.95 Pump Supplies 13681 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $8,800.00 Lob Supplies 13682 Atlantic Pool Care $401.79 Service Agreement 13683 Audio Video Reporting Services $37.33 Audiotape from Radio Show re:New Sewer Rates 13684 ACWA $90.00 1999 Salary Survey 13685 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. $10,500.00 Professional Services- Flow Monitoring Project 13686 AKM Consulting Engineers $6,296.58 Professional Services-Contract#11-17-3 13687 AM Best Co. $86.95 Subscription 13688 American Seals West $16.17 Gaskets 13669 ARMA International $100.00 Membership 13690 AWSI $26.98 D.O.T.Training Program 13691 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $4.491.25 Printing MO 11-7-94 13692 Battery Specialties $950.51 Batteries 13693 BioMedeux Vitek,Inc. $1.832.51 Lob Supplies 13694 Brislol Systems,Inc. $3.200.00 Consulting Services-V2K Project 13695 Bureau of National Affairs $1.648.50 Subscription 13696 Burke Engineering Co. $102.37 Electrical Supplies 13697 BNI Building News $525.51 Subscription 13698 California Automatic Gate $1,178.40 Maintenance Agreement-9 Automatic Gates PI &P2 Orange County Sanitation District Clams Pow ar31r98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13699 California Environmental $25.00 Training Registration 13700 Callan Associates,Inc. $3,550.00 Investment Advisor 13701 Centrepointe Commercial Interior $958.98 Office Furniture 13702 Cole-Pamrer Instrument Company $149.53 Lab Supplies 13703 Communication Briefings $79.00 Subscription 13704 Compuserve Incorporated $110.89 Computer Services 13705 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $2.468.99 Electrical Supplies 13706 Continental-McLaughlin $498.75 Tools 13707 Control Switch $111.63 Electrical Supplies 13708 Convey Development $304.D0 Software License Renewal for 1099 Reporting 13709 Cooper Cameron Corporation $412.01 Engine Supplies 13710 Core[Magazine $24.95 Technical Journal 13711 Corporate Express $4,846.89 Office Supplies 13712 County of Orange $7.567.54 Underground Tank Fee 13713 CH2MHil1 $20,000.00 Engineering Services J-31 13714 Daniels Tire Service $1,550.87 Track Tires 13715 Dexon Computer,Inc. $895.00 VAX Computer Workstation Hardware 13716 Dun 8 Bradstreet Corp.Foundation $198.00 Training Registration 13717 DGA Consultants,Inc. $5.184.0D Surveyhrg Services MO 6-8-94 13718 Electra Bond,Inc $161.63 Mechanical Supplies 13719 James M.Elo $175.00 Cash Advance-Training Expense 13720 Enchanter,Inc. $2,800.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 13721 Fnertech $26.50 Freight Charges 13722 Enterprise Technologies $11,399.20 Consulting Services-FIS Implementation 13723 Expedan $267.61 Orange County Property Information 13724 Federal Express Corp. $82.00 Air Freight 13725 Federal Express Corp. $48.50 Air Freight 13726 Fibertmn $801.42 Fiber Optic Cable 13727 Filter Supply Company $6,067.53 Filters 13728 Finnigan Corp $147.39 Service Agreement 13729 Fisher Scientific $1,222.10 Lab Supplies 13730 Fluid Tech.A Div.of FLW Inc. $500.50 Instrument Supplies 13731 Fodis Benefits Insurance Company $17,610.31 Long Term Disability Premium 13732 Fountain Valley Florist $86.83 Employee Bereavement Flowers 137M Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $525.31 Paid Supplies 13734 Franklin Covey $40.90 Office Supplies 13736 Fry's Electronics $559.88 Employee Computer Loan Program 13736 So.Cal.Gas Company $15,101.29 Natural Gas 13737 General Petroleum $8.277.91 Unleaded Gasoline 13738 GTE California $337.16 Telephone Services 13739 NNJ Grainger Inc. $160.82 Compressor Supplies 13740 Greseby STl $390.03 Engine Supplies 13741 Great American Prinling Co. $8,545.91 Printing 13742 Great Westem Sanitary Supplier $W5.75 Janitorial Supplies 13743 GST,Inc.r Micro City $511.46 Office Supplies 13744 GTE $86.41 Telephone Services 13745 GTE $110.00 Telephone Services 13746 Harold Primrose Ice $48.00 lee For Samples 13747 Hoerbiger Service Inc. $1.898.90 Compressor Parts Orange County Sanitation Dlslrid Claims Paid 8/31198 Cherie Nu. Vendor Amount Description 13748 The Holman Group $746.92 Employee Assistance Program Premium 13749 Home Depot $759.69 Small Hardware 13750 Hub Auto Supply $276.18 Truck Parts 13751 City of Huntngton Beach $1,440.00 Water Use 13752 City of Huntington Beach $16.013.52 Water Use 13753 HI Standard Automotive $1,649.64 TnnA Pads 13754 Idexx 5841.08 Lab Pads&Supplies 13755 Imaging Plus,Inc. $223.60 Office Supplies 13766 Information For Public Affairs $165.00 Training Expense-Video 13767 Inland Empire Equipment,Inc. $2,740.61 Truck Supplies 13758 Intelligence Press,Inc. $245.00 Subscription 13759 Intuitive Technology Corporation 55,000.0D Service Agreement 13760 Irvine Ranch Water District $198.20 Water Use 13761 ICMA $141.00 Subscription 13762 IDM Controls Inc. $197.82 Equipment Repair 13763 IPCO Safety-Ca $1,663.52 Safety supplies 13764 J.G.Tucker and San,Inc. $558.73 Instrument Supplies 13765 Jamison Engineering,Inc, $998.00 Equipment Rental 13766 Jay's Catering $50.00 Director's Meeting Expense 13767 Johnstone Supply $121.49 Electrical Supplies 13768 JWC do MISCO Southwest $12,786.69 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 13769 Kelar Training Centers $2,985.00 Training Registration 13770 Knox Industrial Supplies $5.979.30 Tools 13771 Labware Inc. $22,000.00 Lab Information Management System Software MO 2-26-97 13772 Lasergraphics $431.01 Computer Software 13773 LaserAll Corp. $2,146.78 Service Agreement 13774 Leadership Directories $434.95 Subscription 13775 League Of California Cities $540.00 Conference Registration 13776 Lee&Ro Inc. $5,683.45 Engineering Services 13777 Liquid Handling Systems $159.81 Mechanical Supplies 13778 LA Cellular Telephone Company $1.884.38 Cellular Telephone Service 13779 MILD Machining $770.00 General Electric A/C Our Box Supplies 13780 Mar Vat Electronics $16.21 Instrument Supplies 13781 McKenna Engineering&Equipment 5285.26 Pump Supplies 13782 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 5752.44 Tools 13783 Medlin Controls Co. $237.72 Instrument Supplies 13784 MicroAge Computer $9.375.99 Software 13785 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. $8,639.37 Mechanical Repairs 13786 Mission Uniform Service $3,251.59 Uniform Rentals 13787 Mitsubishi Wireless $100.52 Cellular Telephone Batteries 13758 Michael D.Moore $498.80 Meeting Expense Reimb 13709 MoloPhoto $40.19 Photographic Services 13790 MBC Applied Environmental Science $4,173.00 Vessel Support for Ocean Monitoring Program 13791 MPS Photographic Services 5260.25 Office Supplies 13792 National Plant Services,Inc. $15,975.00 Vacuum TmrJe Services 13793 National Technology Transfer $18,405.00 Training Registration 13794 Network Catalyst $1,000.00 Computer Supplies 13795 Newark Electronics $751.80 Instrument Supplies 13798 City of Newport Beach $71.76 Water Use Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8/31/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13797 North American Cram Bureau $2.480.00 Training Registration&Codification Fees 13798 Occupational Vision Services $471.03 Safety Glasses 13799 Office Depot Business Services $2,085.04 Office Supplies 136M Olsten Staging Service,Inc. $5,298.00 Temporary Employment Services 13801 Orange Coast Frye Supply $16.67 Plumbing Supplies 13802 Orange County Fomm $45.00 Conference Registration 13803 Orange County Wholesale Electric $28.55 Instrument Supplies 13804 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company 52,700.48 Fittings 13805 Ortiz Fire Protection $a33.00 Service Agreement 13806 Oxygen Service Company $282.00 Specialty Gases 13807 Pacific Bell $1283.81 Telephone Services 138DB Pack Bell Internet Services $1,151.50 Internet Services 1380 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2,108.65 Plumbing Supplies 13810 Parts Unlimited $327.48 Truck Supplies 13811 Patriot Video Productions $344.49 Video Taping Services 13812 Permaseal $407.98 Luke Oil 13813 Predate $1.595.00 Computer Software 13814 Pumping Solutions Inc. $162.26 Mechanical Supplies 13515 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. $1,0611 Electrical Supplies 13816 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2,157.61 Trash Removal 13817 Randolph Austin Co. $639.76 Lab Supplies 13818 Restek Corporation $276.90 Training Registration 13819 Robinson Fertilizer Co.,Inc. $3,110.38 Groundskeeping Supplies 13520 Rupes-Kennedy Hydroutics $415.92 Pump 13821 RJN Group,Inc $6.000.00 CMMS Consulting Services 13822 RPM Electric Motors $535.63 Electric Motor Supplies 13823 Sancon Engineering,Inc. $9.212.50 Engineering Services 13824 Saratoga Institute $1.19725 Human Resources Financial Report 1998 13825 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. $736.42 Specialty Gases 13826 Sea Water Visions $814.59 Chiller 13827 Second-Sun $519.49 Light Fixtures 13828 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $447.24 Tools 13829 Shureluck Sales B Engineering $2,363.25 Tools/Hardware 13830 Saudi Larsen 8 Marsh $1,000.00 Professional Services 13831 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. $250.30 Lab Supplies 13832 Skater,Inc. $170.12 Pump Supplies 13833 Smith Pipe$Supply Inc. $808.43 Plumbing Supplies 13834 South Coast Water $366.96 Office Supplies 13835 Southern California Edison Co. $3,060.16 Power 13836 Southern California Water $61.03 Water Use 13837 Sparkletts $2.128.44 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 13838 Sprint $30.45 Long Distance Telephone Service 13839 StaleNel $330.00 Seminar Registration 13640 Starting Art $65.19 Art Supplies 13841 Steven Enterprises.Inc. $920.14 Management Agreement 13542 Summit Steel $1,113.64 Metal 13843 Sunset Ford $148.00 - Truck Supplies 135" Super Chem Corporation $331 Chemicals 13845 Swains Electric Molar Service $304.65 Pump E Orange County Sanitation District , Claims Paid 8/31r98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13946 T B C Industrial Controls,Inc $1,663.31 Electrical Supplies 13847 Technic Computer Service Corp. $202.88 Printer Maintenance 13840 Think Earth Environmental Education $7.000.00 Membership 13849 Third Wave $850,00 Document Management Project Consultant 13850 Thomas Gray 9 Assoc. $432.00 Lab Services 13851 Thomas M.Dawes.P.E. $6.120.00 Professional Services MO 4.23-97 13352 Thompson Industrial Supply $2.809.66 Mechanical Supplies 13853 Robed Tighe $4.800,00 Relocation Expense Project#5.41-1 13854 Tony's Lock&Safe Service $344.20 Locks 8 Keys 13855 Edward M.Torres $250.00 Cash Advance-Mee0ng Expense 13856 Tri-State Seminar On4ho-River $45.00 Seminar Registration 13657 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc, 94.260.60 Conrad Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 13BSS Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $381.08 Truck Supplies 13859 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $854.00 Lab Services 13860 Tustin Dodge $79.65 Truck Supplies 13861 Tuthill Corp $427.88 Valve 13862 US FittenPotymetrics, Inc. $2,525.50 Lab Supplies 13863 USC $25.00 SCEC Quarterly Newsletter 13864 Valley Cities Supply Company $2.975.57 Plumbing Supplies 13865 Veme's Plumbing $17,850.00 Plumbing Supplies 13M Village Nurseries $63.26 Landscaping Supplies 13867 Vision Service Plan{CA) $7.511.70 Vision Service Premium 13868 Vortex Corp. $424.02 Service Agreement-Repair Roll-Up Door 13869 VWR Scientific Products $7,483.05 Lab Supplies 13870 Weather and Wind Instrument Co. $429.98 Wind Sock Frame 13871 Wiling Scientific $496.63 Lab Supplies 13872 Wyatt Data Services $269.00 1998-99 ECS Geographic Report 13873 Xerox Corporation $12.230.92 Copier Leases 13874 Kirk Xpedex Paper 8 Graphics $201.43 Photo Coping Service 13875 Douglas M.Stewed $755.00 Meeting Expense Reimb 13876 John W.Swindler $784.88 Meeting Expense Reknb 13877 Jean E.Tappan $141L50 Reimburse Director Room Charges 13878 Michelle Tuchman $21.90 Cellular Phone Charges 13879 Layne T.Baroldi $520.88 Meeting Expense Reimb 13580 Mark Castillo $1,066.22 Training Expense Reimb 13881 James E.Colston $294.78 Meeting Expense Reimb 13582 Kevin L.Hadden $692.42 Meeting Expense Reimb 13a83 Orange County Sanitation Dist. $1.217.92 Petty Cash Reimb, 13884 Space Leasing Company $19.618.90 Construction Trailers P2-70 13985 Yu-U Tsai $2,551.25 Computer Loan 3, ,736.27 Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9116198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13910 Dell Marketing L.P. $78.615.00 3-Dell Network Servers-Div.930 13911 Delta Dental $39,072.80 Dental Insurance Plan 13912 Duke Energy Trading B Marketing 564,559.68 Natural Gas-Spec#P-170 13913 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan $25.358.56 Medical Insurance Premium 13914 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. $51,924.10 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 13915 Mladen Buntich Constmdion Co. $586.915.69 Construction 3.38.3,2-R-97 13916 Nat West Markets $68.121,69 COP Letter of Credit Fees 13917 NCCI Enterprises,Inc. $48,156.03 Construction Contract#240 13918 Oracle Corporation $32.303.45 Computer Software-Full Enterprise Edition License 13919 Pacifcare of Ca $43.317.26 Health Insurance Premium 13920 Remedy $28.598.41 Temporary Employment Services 13921 Southern California Edison $45,217.63 Power 13922 Tub Ranch/Mogan Forms $33.060.57 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 13923 United HealthCare/Metre Health $133,184.75 Medical Health Insurance 13924 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $35,810.46 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C-044 13925 Advance Constructors Inc. 5219,455.10 Construction J-344,P2-755 13926 Fleming Engineering,Inc. $46,728.33 Bawer Repair MO 6-24-98 13927 County of Orange $46.344.81 Sewer Service Fees 13928 Irvine Ranch Water District $752.807.04 Transfer Connection Fees 13929 American Telephone 8 Telegraph $2.620.08 Long Distance Telephone Services 13930 American Telephone B Telegraph $3.00 Lang Distance Telephone Services 13931 Adamson Industries $200.08 Lab Supplies - 13932 Air Cold Supply 398.26 Air Conditioner Repairs 13933 Airbgme Express $18.45 Air Freight 13934 Allied Packing 8 Rubber Inc. $507.13 Mechanical Supplies 13935 Allied Supply $214.50 Mechanical Pars 8 Supplies 13936 American Airlines $6,358.01 Travel Services 13937 Arlicom,Inc. $2.506.00 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 13938 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $315.00 Service Agreement-Pest Control 13939 Aped Valve And Primer $8.544.68 Plumbing Supplies 13940 Appleone Employment Service $959.17 Temporary Employment Services 13941 Applied Industrial Technology $2,243.43 Pump Supplies 13942 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $1,600.00 Lab Supplies 13943 Annor-Vac $3.370.00 Vacuum Truck Services 13944 Atlas Chrysler Plymouth $18.273.32 1996 Dodge Ram Truck 13945 Auto Shop Equipment Co., Inc. $330.78 Fillers 13946 Azalea Software,Inc. $604.00 Software 13947 AMAI/Padgett-Thompson 5834.00 Training Expense 13948 American National Standards ANSI $32.00 Publications 13949 Assoc of lietro.Sewerage Agencies $10.00 Training Registration 13950 APEX Communications $8.301.29 Equipment Installation-Employee Card Readers 13951 ARB/PERP $180.00 Registration Fees for 2 Portable Engines 13952 AWWA Annual Conference $430.00 Subscription 13953 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $1.301.62 Printing MO 11-7-94 13954 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $5.555.17 Telephone Installation 13955 Baftelle-Northwest $2.023.47 Solids Impact Meeting 13956 Baudville $110.36 Frames 13957 BloMeneua Vdek, Inc. $68.02 Lab Supplies 13958 BioSource Consulting $14,993.90 Consulting Service-Biosolida 8 Watershed e Orange County Sanitation District i Claims Pak 9116198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13959 Birmingham Controls $350.73 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 13960 Boyle Engineering Corporation $2.495.96 Engineering Services 7.23 13961 Bristol Systems,Inc. $9,000.00 Consulting Services-T2K Project 13962 Budget Janitorial,Ina $900.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-02-94 13963 Burch Ford $18,407.63 1998 Ford Taurus 13964 Burlington Safety Laboratory $468.00 Testing Services 13965 Bush&Associates Inc. $932.00 Surveying Services NO 6.25-97 13966 California NGV Coalition $500.00 Membership 13967 Calolymplc Safety $6.026.08 Safety Supplies 13968 Carleton Engineers&Consultants $2,460.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality 13969 Carollo Engineers $7,443.49 Engineering Services-Pt-38,P243,MO 414-93 13970 Casten.Inc. $815.92 Valve Supplies 13971 Cenlrepointe Commercial Interiors $2,234.36 Office Furniture 13972 Certified Labs $1.018.35 Lab Supplies 13973 Charles P.Crowley Co. $453.39 Instrument Pads 13974 Chrome Crankshaft Co. $794.00 Pump Supplies 13975 Clean Source $200.42 Janitorial Supplies 13976 Coast Fire Equipment $5,091.90 Service Agreement 13977 Communications Performance Group $9,090.00 Professional Services 13978 Computers America,Inc. $4.639.86 Compulersupplies 13079 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $5.386.97 Electrical Supplies 13980 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. $176.71 Plumbing Supplies 13981 ConBnenta4MCLaughlin $48.00 Tools 13982 Converse Consultants $1,227.80 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 13983 Cooper Cameron Corporation $1.911.18 Engine Supplies 13984 Corporate Express $5.983.93 Office Supplies 13985 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. $3,289.07 Mechanical Supplies 13986 The Cragar Odel Company $884.00 Training Expense 13987 Culligan Water Conditioning $30.00 Soft Water Service 13988 CH2MHill $14,336.06 Engineering Services J-31 13989 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection $8.600.40 Lab Supplies 13990 CR&R Incorporated $6.300.00 Container Rentals 13991 Dapper Tire Co. $216.47 Truck Tires 13992 Del Mar Analytical $2,394.00 Blosollds Analysis 13993 Dexon Computer,Inc. $8,265.00 Computer Workstation&License Documentation 139N DeZurick $2,223.96 Valves 13995 Don Maurer $2,345.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 139% Dun&Bradstreet Corp. Foundation $495.00 Training Registration 13997 Duthie Generator Service,Inc. $6,606.00 Generator Supplies 13998 Electra Bond,Inc. $888.94 Mechanical Supplies 13999 Embarcadero Technologies,Inc. $6.458.06 5-User License DB Artisan for Oracle Software 14000 Enchanter,Inc. $4.200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 14001 Enterprise Technologies $3,680.OD Consulting Services-CMMS Implementation 14002 Environmental Resources Association $920.20 Lab Services 14003 Environmental Sampling Supply $342.05 Lab Supplies 14004 ENS Resources,Inc. 54,982.23 Professional Services 14005 Federal Express Corp. $92.70 Air Freight 14005 Fibedron $666.04 Fiber Optic Cable 14007 Filehlel Corporation $24,851.98 Computer Software-IDM Desktop 2.X,Doc Services Oracle,Annual Maintenance Agreement Orange County San8e8on District Claims Paid ill Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14008 Finnigan Corp $144.21 Service Agreement 140M Fisher Scientific $656.08 Lab Supplies 14010 Flo.Systems,Inc. $18,351.71 Pump Supplies 14011 Fountain Valley Camera $57.11 Photo Supplies 14012 City of Fountain Valley $14,355.6D Water Use 14013 Franklin Covey $389.67 Once Supplies 14014 Frazee Paint and Wellcovering $390.06 Paint Supplies 14015 Frost Engineering Service Co. $1,303.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 14016 Frye Electronics $60.23 Employee Computer Loan Program 14017 FM International,Inc. $7,075.00 RFP for the Engineering Document Management System 14018 Ganahl Lumber Company $220.78 Lumber/Hardware 14019 GarraB-Callahan Company $5,037.31 Chemicals 14020 GTE California $3,500.49 Telephone Services 14021 Golde amesl Window Service $1,798.00 Window Cleaning Service 14022 Great American Printing Co. $447.68 Printing 14023 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $729.38 Janitorial Supplies 14024 GST,Inc./Micro City $3,216.66 Office Supplies 14026 GTE $93.52 Telephone Services 14026 Hecker Equipment Company $366.31 Truck Supplies 14027 Harold Primrose Ice $96.00 Ice For Samples 14028 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli $153.40 Directors Meeting Expense 14029 HI-Tek Tenecl0ck Company $143.02 Repair&Maintenance Service-Slromberg Dalerrime Stamper 14030 Hoerbiger Service Inc $797.72 Compressor Parts 14031 Home Depot $278.67 Small Hardware 14032 Hopkins Technical Products $1,068.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 14033 Hub Auto Supply $79.88 Truck Parts 14034 Imaging Plus,Inc. $575.55 Office Supplies 14035 Industrial Air Compressor $426.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 14036 Information Resources $185.00 Personnel Services 14037 Interstate Battery Systems $656.63 Batteries 14038 tpswitch Inc. $155.00 Computer Software-4 each of WS-FTP Pro 5.0 14039 Irvine Photo Graphics $13.38 Photographic Services 14040 Irvine Ranch Water District $3.54 Water Use 14041 IBM Corporation $284.75 Service Contract 14042 IBM Corporation $12,353.24 Lease Payment on the AS400 14043 IPCO Safety-Ca $14,426.70 Safety Supplies 14044 ISA Publications $577.00 Subscription 14045 Jamison Engineering, Inc. $3,982.54 Equipment Rental 14046 Jays Catering $226.01 Directors Meeting Expense 14047 Johnstone Supply $1,162.34 Electrical Supplies 14048 Frances L.Kaluzny $1,50D.00 Consulting Service-Human Resources 14049 Knox Industrial Supplies $3,196.56 Tools 14050 Larkin Inc. $298.50 Service-Recertify Refrigerant Recovery Cylinders 14051 LaserAll Corp. $286.15 Service Agreement 14052 LaMutle Company $148.27 Sulfide Test Kit 14063 Lessons In Leadership $445.00 Seminar Registration 14054 Lexis-Nazis $724.37 Subscription 1055 LA Cellular Telephone Company $840.74 Cellular Telephone Service 14056 Mag Systems $859.05 Electrical Supplies E Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9/16198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14057 Maintenance Technology Corp. $701.75 Welding Supplies 14058 Mantle Motors $45.00 Towing Services 14059 Mar Vac Electronics $1,518.70 Instrument Supplies 14080 Matt Chlor Inc. $1.482.82 Ferric Chloride Supplies 14061 Me Junkin Corp $724.08 Plumbing Supplies 14062 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $2,841.69 Tools 14063 Measurement Variables,Inc. $792.50 Filters 14064 MicroAge Computer $3,406.62 Software 14065 Midway Mfg.6 Machining Co. 94.309.13 Mechanical Repairs 14066 Mission Uniform Service $3.154.15 Uniform Rentals 14067 Mitchell Repair Information Co. E364.50 Subscripbon 14068 Monitor Labs,Inc. $978.93 Instruments 14069 The Monster Board $175.00 Job Pealing on the Internet 14070 Montgomery Watson $1,379.75 Air Toxics Project MO 12-12-90 14071 Moreland 8 Associates $19.176.25 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 14072 MPS Photographic Services $19.94 Office Supplies 14073 N.Glantz 8 Son $813.85 Tools 14074 National Mlcrcwmp Services $2,045.00 Service Agreement 14075 National Plant Services,Inc. $3.475.00 Vacuum Truck Services 14076 National Research Council Canada $325.60 Subscription 14077 National Seminars Group $199.00 Seminar Registration 14078 National Technology Transfer $2.955.00 Training Registration 14079 Neal Supply Co. $1.638.88 Plumbing Supplies 14080 Network Catalyst $2.994.37 Computer Supplies 140al New Horizons Computer Learning $1.590.00 Software Training Classes 14082 Nextel Communications $5.108.58 Cellular Phones B Air Time 14083 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. $19.874.10 LubncantlDiesel Fuel 14084 The Norco Companies $111.00 Mail Delivery Service 14065 NAS Associates,Inc. $4,417.75 Service Agreement-1995 Regional Monitoring Program 14086 O.C.Council of Government $25.00 Meeting Expense 14087 Occupational Vision Services $349.09 Safety Glasses 14088 Omce Depot Business Services $1.249.19 Office Supplies 14089 Office Pavillion $841.5D Office Furniture Repairs 14090 Olsten Starting Service,Inc. $960.00 Temporary Employment Services 14091 Olympic Creations $1.581.20 OCSD logo pins 14092 Operation Technology.Inc. $11.391.25 Computer Software 14093 Orange County Sanitation District WAI Petry Cash Reimb. 14094 Orange County Water District $7.010.00 Toilet Exchange Program 14095 Orange County Wholesale Electric $4.665.07 Instrument Supplies 14095 Orange VaNs&Fitting Company $22.09 Fittings 14097 Oxygen Service Company $1,886.64 Specialty Gases 14098 OCB Reprographics $2,175.93 Blueprinting 8 Photocopying Service-Spec.9P-173 14099 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. $7,734./1 Electrical Supplies 14100 Pacific Bell $1.151.50 Telephone Services 14101 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2,774.61 Plumbing Supplies 14102 Pacific Pans am Controls $13.925.0 Instrument Supplies 14103 Padgett-Thompson $710.00 Seminar Registration 14104 Padre Janitorial Supplies $214.97 Janitorial Supplies 14105 Pagenet $3,698.45 Rental Equipment Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9/16/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14108 Parallax Education $50.00 Training Expense 14107 Parkhouse Tire Inc. $1,929.36 Time 1410E Parts Unlimited $568.38 Truck Supplies 14109 Petco Animal Supplies $47.35 Lab Supplies 14110 Pima Gro Systems Inc. $20,125.62 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 14111 Presidium Inc 54.166.66 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin. 14112 Pumping Solutions Inc. $75.03 Mechanical Supplies 14113 Puhmeister,Inc $800.64 Pump Supplies 14114 Quanterta,Inc. $1.650.00 Analytical Service 14116 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2,157AI Trash Removal 14116 Reallime Systems Corporation $4.085.00 Integration 8 Support Services 14117 Reltastar $15.248.44 L6e Insurance Premium 14115 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop $221.94 Auto Repair 14119 Ronan Engineering Co. $172.32 Electrical Paris B Supplies 14120 Rosens Electrical Equipment $400.00 Electrical Supplies 14121 Ryan Herco Products Corp. $1.047.48 Metal 14122 RMS Engineering 8 Design,Inc. $995.00 Engineering Services 14123 Santa Ana River Flood Protection $1.400.00 Membership 14124 Schwing America,Inc. $56.63 Pump Supplies 14125 Srott.Reilly B Whitehead $64.75 Legal Services-Personnel Issues 14126 Sea-BIM Electronics,Inc. $218.00 Lab Repairs 14127 Seagate Software $8,000.00 Training Fee 14128 City or Seal Beach $110.48 Water Use 14129 Second-Sun $2,621.76 Light Fixtures 14130 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $9120 Tools 14131 Shimadzu Scientific Instrument $104.52 Lab Supplies 14132 Shureluck Sales B Engineering $2.446.78 Tools)Hardware 14133 Slemon,Larsen 6 Marsh $3,000.00 Professional Services-Watershed Management 14134 SkillPalh Seminars $99.00 On-Site Training 14135 Sludge Newsletter $409.00 Subscription 14136 Smim Pipe 8 Supply Inc. 580.11 Plumbing Supplies 14137 So.Cal.Gas Company $6.617.33 Natural Gas 14138 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees 14139 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $152.10 Permit Fees 14140 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $9,748.40 Permit Fees 14141 South Coast Air Quality hi $11,892.00 Permit Fees 14142 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $4,038.80 Permit Fees 14143 Scum Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees 14144 Sant Coast Air Qualdy MngL $175.60 Permit Fees 14145 Spurn Coast Air Quality MngL $175.60 Permit Fees 14146 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $175.60 Permit Fees 14147 Southern California Edison $7,128.87 Power 14148 Southern California Marine Institute $1,560.00 Rental Equipment 14149 Sparklells $2.280.33 Drinking Water/Cooler Ronlals 14150 Standard Supply 8 Equipment Co. $46.80 Pump Supplies 14151 Stale Chemical Mfg.Co. $700.00 Janitorial Supplies 14152 Steven Enterprises,Inc. $47.26 Management Agreement 14153 Strata International,Inc. $926.98 Chemicals Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9116198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14154 Summit Steel $370.22 Metal 14155 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance $4,420.00 Landscape Maintenance 14156 Sunset Ford $200.16 Truck Supplies 14157 Swains Electric Motor Service $487.36 Pump 14158 SETAC $600.00 Subscription 14159 The Register $810.95 Notices It Ads 14160 Thompson Industrial Supply $605.54 Mechanical Supplies 14161 Time Warner Communications $40.47 Cable Services 14162 Aerofund Financtairrop Hal Productions $96.65 Directors Meeting Expense 14163 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River $40.00 Seminar Registration 14164 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Ina $7.770.00 Contract GrouMskeeping NO 5.11-94 14165 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $53.82 Truck Supplies 1416E Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $2,644.00 Lab Services 14167 Ti's Tropical Fish $1,269.30 Lab Pads It Supplies 14166 Union Dodge $18,389.69 1999 Dodge Ram Truck 14169 The Unisource Corporation 56,255.29 Office Supplies 14170 United Parcel Service $26.28 Parcel Services 14171 ULI $24.95 Publication 14172 Valley Cities Supply Company $3,648.05 Plumbing Supplies 14173 VWR ScientiSC Products $1.144.20 Lab Supplies 14174 The Wackenhut Corporation $12.236.51 Security Guards - 14175 Wayne Electric Co. $315.58 Electrical Supplies 14176 Western Slates Chemical Inc. $23,734.36 Caustic Soda Solution C-038 14177 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $715.00 Consulting Services 14178 Xerox Corporation $8.903.93 Copier Leases 14179 CNA Trust $24,353.90 Construction Contract O 5.41-1 14180 Veme's Plumbing $19,035.00 Plumbing Supplies 14181 Donald F.McIntyre $571.98 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14182 Michael D.Moore $426.96 Training Expense Reimb. 14183 Peter M.Morrison $657.18 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14194 Orange County Sanitation District $4,748.27 Workers Comp.Reimb. 14185 Douglas M.Stewart $755.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14186 Edward M.Tortes $347.75 Meeting Expanse Rehnb, 14187 Blake Anderson $118.91 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14188 Layne T.Baroldi $438.86 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14189 Molly Baross 32,400.00 Settlement Claim*7-CSD-98-L-2 14190 Jeffrey Brown $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting 14191 County of Orange $5,505.00 Supplemental Samar Service Fee It Cancellations 14192 Chloe D.Dee $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting 14193 Vladimir A.Kogan $250.00 Cash Advance-Meeting 14104 Orange County Sanitation District $360.77 Petty Cash Reimb. 14195 Orrick,Herrington It Sutdille $7,500.00 Profesional Services 14196 Public Financial Management $7,500.00 CedKcate of Participation-1990-92 Series"C"Arbitrage Management Program 14197 U.S.Postal Service $5,000.00 Postage 14198 Pacific Bell $20.36 Telephone Services Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9I30198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14227 The Vantage Group,Inc. $53.618.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programming Project 14228 Sio Gro Division $26,148.40 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 14229 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $167.159.00 Engineering Services J40-1,340.2 14230 Camillo Engineers $67,041.16 Engineering ServMas P1-60&P2-60 14231 Dell Marketing L.P. $90.320.51 Computers-2-Network Solvent+6-Computers-Div 930 14232 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $76,884.80 Natural Gas 14233 Holmes&Newer Inc. $26,871.43 Engineering Services 241 14234 James Martin&Co. $83.757.50 Data Integration Project 14235 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. $102,188.95 Ferric Chloride NO 9.27-95 14235 Orange County Water District $46.353.60 Green Acres Project Water Use MO 6.9-93 14237 Pima Gro Systems,Inc. $93,253.68 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 14238 Polydyne,Inc. $170,893.00 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 14239 Power Distributors,Inc. $38,450.00 Lighting Fixtures Installation 14240 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. $59,425.06 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 14241 Southern California Edison $57,653.27 Power 14242 Tule RancNhtagan Farms $75,116.77 Residuals Removal MO}29-95 14243 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart $75,730.88 Legal Services 14244 Margate Construction Inc. $158,935.50 Construction P7-36-2 14245 American Telephone&Telegraph $12.54 Long Distance Telephone Services 14246 Amedcen Telephone&Telegraph $26.16 Long Distance Telephone Services 14247 American Telephone&Telegraph $1,285.14 Long Distance Telephone Services 14248 Able Equipment Rental $647.D9 Equipment Rental 14249 Action Bearing $670.26 Mechanical Supplies 14250 Advance Aluminum&Brass $19,895.00 Mechanical Supplies 14251 Allied Packing&Rubber Inc. $339.79 Mechanical Supplies 14252 Allied Supply Co. $134.54 Plumbing Supplies 14253 Allied Supply $837.73 Mechanical Supplies 14254 American Airlines $5,270.46 Travel Services 14255 American Payroll Association $125.00 Membership 14256 American Sigma,Inc. $18.80 Mechanical Supplies 14257 American Sigma,Inc. $18,716.20 Mechanical Supplies 14258 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $575.00 Service Agreement 14269 APpleone Employment Service $7.643.34 Temporary Employment Services 14260 Applied industrial Technology $94.26 Pump Supplies 14261 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $325.00 Lab Supplies 14262 Awards&Trophies By Bea $322.71 Plaques 14263 AKM Consulting Engineers $12,173.36 Consulting Services 11-20 14264 AMAIIPedgeO-Thompson $395.00 Training Expanse 14265 API Fund For Payroll Education $618.00 Training Expense 14266 AWSI $256.00 D.O.T.Training Program 14267 Balley Fischer&Porter Company $187.87 Electrical Supplies 14268 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $1,659.21 Printing MO 11-7-94 14269 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $3,200.32 Telephone Installation 14270 Bauer Compressors $116.24 Compressor Supplies 14271 Berkman Instruments,Inc. $445.15 Lab Supplies 14272 Black Box Corporation $508.24 Computer Supplies 14273 Boise Radiator Service $264.30 Truck Repairs 14274 Boyle Engineering Corporation $21,635.62 Engineering Services 7-23 14275 Bristol Systems,Inc. $9,600.00 Consulting Services-V21,Project E .. Orange County Sanitation District r Claims Paid 9I3om Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14276 Brithinee Electric $165.08 Electrical Supplies 14277 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $8.110.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94 14278 BNI Building News $218.37 Subscription 14279 California Auto Refrigeration $352.33 Service Agreement 14280 Calgomia Relocation Services $156.00 Moving Services 14281 Caltrol,Inc. $2,988AS Hardware 14282 Cashco,Inc. $2,579.58 Valve Supplies 14283 Century Paint $240.10 Paint Supplies 14284 Charles P.Crowley Co. $656.46 Instrument Pans 14285 Chrome Crankshaft Co. $240.00 Pump Supplies 14286 City Office Furniture.Inc. $371.68 OMce Furniture 14287 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. $220.24 Office Supplies 14288 Compressor Components Of Calif. $1,745.55 Pump Supplies 14289 Computers Amence,Inc. $388.74 Computer Supplies 14290 Connell GM Pads $44.39 Truck Supplies 14291 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 52,188.99 Electrical Supplies 14292 Cooper Cameron Corporation $2,349.97 Engine Supplies 14293 Copelco Capital,Inc. $2.864.00 Copier Lease 14294 Corporate Express Imaging $442.54 Instrument Supplies 14295 Corporate Express $5,022.43 Office Supplies 14296 Cost Containment Solutions $500.96 Workers Compensation Services 14297 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $91.97 Truck Parts 14298 Cylec Industries $15,241.36 Anionic Polymer 14299 CH2M HILL $3,056.62 Engineering Services J-31 14300 CPI: California Pipeline Inspection $713.16 Lab Supplies 14301 CPI-The Alternative Supplier $4.728.13 Lab Supplies 14302 CS Company $240.08 Plumbing Supplies 14303 CWEA 1998 Conference $350.00 Conference Registration 14304 Davis Instruments $505.12 Mechanical Supplies 14305 DOZurick $777.76 Valves 14306 Dickson Inc. $933.12 Electrical Supplies 14307 Dover Elevator Company $1,203.60 Elevator Maintenance 14308 Dupont Engineered Services $14,500.00 Painting Maintenance Services MO 4.22-98 14309 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. $122.00 Medical Screening 14310 Electra Bond.Inc. 5404.06 Mechanical Supplies 14311 Elsevier Science $821.00 Subscription 14312 Emergency Management Network,Inc. $2,000.00 CPR/First Aid Training 14313 Enchanter,Inc $5,600.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 14314 EMAT West'98 $335.00 Registration Fees 14315 EDE International,Inc, $6.932.50 Risk Assessment-Y2k Project 14316 Federal Express Corp. $111.55 Air Freight 14317 Fiberlron $881.95 Fiber Optic Cable 14318 FBeNET Corporation $2.742.01 Computer Software 81DM Desktop Training Expense 14319 Fisher Scientific $1,213.37 Lab Supplies 14320 Flo-Systems,Inc. $75.52 Pump Supplies 14321 Franklin Covey $499.91 Office Supplies 14322 Fry's Electronics $183.12 Computer Supplies 14323 City of Fullerton $459.75 Water Use 14324 FUN Inc. $414.40 Electrical Supplies Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9130198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14325 G.E.Supply Company $8.896.60 Electric Parts 14326 Ganahl Lumber Company $2.271.95 LumberlHardware 14327 Garmlt-Callahan Company $1.410.99 Chemicals 14328 Gauge Repair Service $204.31 Gauge Repair 14329 General Binding Corporation $470.77 Maintenance Agreement 14330 GTE California $6.153.47 Telephone Services 14331 Giedch-Muchell,Inc. $566.72 Pump Supp0es 14332 Government Institutes Inc. $95.00 Publication 14333 PAN Grainger Inc. $1.254.75 Compressor Supplies 14334 Great American Printing Co. $4,176.87 Printing 14335 Guy L.Warden 8 Sons $81.91 Compressor Supplies 14336 GST,Inc,I Micro City $2,306.14 Office Supplies 14337 Hach Company $382.81 Lab Supplies 14338 Harrington Industrial Plastics $617.74 Plumbing Supplies 14339 Hello Dared,Inc. $668.16 Telephone Headsets 14340 Herb's Blackforest Bakery $101.40 Directors Meeting Expense 14341 Hewlett-Packard $2.456.70 Service Agreement 14342 Hiffi Inc. $2,641.47 Tools 14343 Hoerbiger Service Inc $1.333.09 Compressor Parts 14344 The Holman Group $745.50 Employee Assistance Program Premium 14345 Hub Auto Supply $20.27 Truck Parts 14346 City of Huntington Beach $16.013.07 Water Use 14347 HI Standard Automotive $407.41 Truck Parts 14348 Ideal Scanners B Systems $925.00 Software 14349 Industrial Threaded Product,Inc. $127.26 Connectors 143W InfoEdge Inc. $585.00 Computer Supplies 14351 Inland Empire Equipment,Ix. 521124 Truck Supplies 14352 International Mascot Corporation 52,000.00 Equipment Rental 14363 Irvine Ranch Water District $66.14 Water Use 14354 Cary of Irvine $178.68 Inspection Services 1436S Isco,Inc. $88.11 Instrument 14356 IBM Corporation $5,177.38 Service Contract 14357 IDM Controls Inc $8.142.14 Equipment Repair 14358 IPCO Safety-Ca $447.65 Safety Supplies 14359 ISA Expo/98 $90.00 Registration Fees 14360 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc $591.66 Instrument Supplies 14361 J.L.Wingert Co. $101.15 Electrical Supplies 14362 Jay's Catering $766.69 Directors Meeting Expense 14363 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. $5,125.00 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 14364 Kahl Scientific Instruments $191.56 Lab Supplies 14365 Kelar Training Centers $2,985.00 Registration Fees 14366 Knox Industrial Supplies $927.48 Tools M67 LiserAll Corp. $657.82 Service Agreement 14368 Liquid Handling Systems $4.31 Mechanical Supplies 14369 IA Cellular Telephone Company $1,967.52 Cellular Telephone Service 14370 M.E.Sa0cermann Co. $22,373.53 Sewer Repair 14371 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers $11615.00 Engineering Services 2-37 14372 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $911.15 Toot 14373 Helier,Inc. $7,500.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Data Integration Project C Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9130/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14374 Micro Flex $1,204.00 Gloves 14375 MicmAge Computer $3.701.56 Computer Supplies-l-HP Printer 8l-Print Server 14376 Mission Uniform Service $3,372.42 Uniform Rentals 14377 Morton Salt $263.99 Salt 14378 MotoPhoto $56.01 Photographic Services 14379 MGD Technologies,Inc. $9,860.00 Maintenance Agreement 14380 MPS Photographic Services $17.79 Office Supplies 14381 National Fire Protection $525.00 Membership Renewal Fees 14382 National Seminars Group $199.00 Seminar Registration 14383 Network Construction Services $9.640.00 Construction Services-Wring 14384 Network Solutions Group $780.00 Lob Services 14385 City of Newport Beach $10,288.25 Construction Services-PCH/Newport Blvd.Interchange Improvements 14386 Nextel Communications $818.81 Cellular Phones B Alr time 14387 Hickey Petroleum Co. Inc $19.739.83 LubricantlDlesel Fuel 14388 NAB Associates,Inc. $634.50 Service Agreement-1998 Regional Monitoring Program 14389 NGV Ecotrans Group,LLC $114.09 Publications 14390 Office Depot Business Services $4,484A7 Office Supplies 14391 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. $2.826.00 Temporary Employment Services 14392 Oracle Corporation $3.636.00 Software-Training 14393 Orange County Wholesale Electric,Inc. $53.93 Instrument Supplies 14394 Orange Courier $10.80 Courier Services 14395 Orange Valve 8 Filling Company $85.75 Fittings 14396 Oxygen Service Company $2,150.18 Specialty Genes 14397 DAG $961.19 Software License 14398 Pacific Bell $1,278.41 Telephone Services 14399 Pacific Mechanical Supply $1.143.27 Plumbing Supplies 14400 Pacific Parts and Conlrols,Inc. 94.599.64 Instrument Supplies 14401 Paris Unlimited $110.56 Truck Supplies 14402 Pftney Bowes $336.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement 14403 Presidium Inc. 32,083.33 Wurkees Comp.Claims Admin. 14404 Primavera $15.181.20 Consulting Services 14405 Pyramid Fence Company,Inc. $8.381.00 Fencing Installation 14408 PCS Express $123.00 Courier Services 14407 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2.157.61 Trash Removal 14408 Ralnin Instrument Co.,Inc. $412.02 Lab Supplies 14409 Reliastar $8.128.00 Life Insurance Premium 14410 Reliastar Bankers Security Lire Ins. $5,183.40 Life Insurance Premium 14411 Remedy $9,954.84 Temporary Employment Services 14412 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop $112.71 Auto Repair 14413 Rosen's Electrical Equipment Go. $538.75 Electrical Supplies 14414 RJN Group,Inc. $5.062.50 CMMS Consulting Services 14415 RPM Electric Motors $181.63 Electric Motor Supplies 14416 RS Hughes Co.,Inc 3601.81 Paint Supplies 14417 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. $598.06 Specialty Gases 14418 Scott,Reilly B Whitehead $342.33 Legal Services-Personnel Issues 14419 Sea Water Visions $165.51 Chiller 14420 Sea-Biro Electronlce, Inc. $335.00 Lab Roper. 14421 Seagate Software $1,275.00 Training Fee 14422 Shureluck Sales$Engineering $1,833.36 Tools/Hardware Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9130t98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14423 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. $502.78 Lab Supplies 14424 Skyline Displays of Orange County,Inc. $2,112.51 Halogen Light Set 14425 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. $275.86 Plumbing Supplies 14426 Snap-On Incorporated $242.39 Tools 14427 So.Cal.Gas Company $13.048.30 Natural Gas 14428 South Coast Water $170.00 Water System Maint.Agreement 14429 Spex Ceriprep Inc. $359.67 Lab Supplies 14430 Sprint $34.95 Long Distance Telephone Service 14431 Square D Company $5,989.44 Software License Agreement 14432 State Chemical Mfg.Co. $156.51 Janitorial Supplies 14433 Steve Casada Construction Co. $9,076.96 Conshuc0on Services-Street Repair 14434 Strata International,Inc. $926.98 Chemicals 14435 Summit Steel $444.02 Metal 14436 Sun-Belt Landscape&Maintenance $5.425.00 Landscape Maint. 14437 Sunset Ford $213.57 Truck Supplies 1443E Swains Electric Motor Service $223.91 Pump 14439 Peer A.Swan $25.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14440 Taylor Industrial Software $5,035.00 Service Agreement 14441 Thomas Gray&Assoc. $330.00 Lab Services 14442 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $294.83 Mechanical Supplies 14443 Track&Auto Supply,Inc. $131.53 Truck Supplies 14444 Underground Service Alen of So.Calif. $27500 Membership 14445 Union Bank of California $104.69 Account Analysis 14446 Union Dodge $20.239.76 1998 Dodge Truck 14447 United Parcel Service $588.03 Parcel Services 14448 University Products,Inc $74.10 Office Supplies 14449 Valley Cities Supply Company $3.569.49 Plumbing Supplies 14450 Verne's Plumbing $3,490.00 Plumbing Supplies 14451 VWR Scientific Products $9,459.69 Lab Supplies 14452 The Wackenhut Corporation $9,160.48 Security Guards 14453 Weather and Wind Instrument Co. $475.72 Wind Sock Frame 14464 West Coast Safety Supply Co. $391.75 Tools 1"55 Westrux International $16.57 Mechanical Supplies 14456 Xerox Corporation $5.923.91 Copier Leases 14457 3CMA $540.00 Registration Fees 1"53 Systems Integrated $12,471.84 Construction Services J-31-3 14459 Nicholas J.Arhonles $100.00 Training Expense Reimb. 14460 Layne T.Sawkil $399.39 Training Expense Reimb. 14461 Shabbir S.Basrai $951.79 Training Expense Reimb. 14462 Eva M.Bradford $57.85 Director Meeting Expense Reimb. 14463 Patrick B.Carnahan $206.28 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14464 David M.Chafe $599.54 Training Expense Reimb. 14465 John B.Falkenstein $1,302.31 Inspection Travel Expense Reimb. 1"66 Michelle R.Hetherington $353.90 Meeting Expense Reimb. 14467 David A.Ludwin $605.00 Registration Fee Reimb. 14458 James McCann $190.01 Training Expense Reimb. 14469 Peter M.Morrison $250.00 Training Expense Reimb. 14470 Robert Oman $252.53 Meeting Expense Reimb. m c 1 Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 9/30198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 14471 Charles E.Read $411.27 Training Expense Reimb. 14472 Dale E. Sparks $322.80 Training Expense Relmb. 14473 Antonio S.Valenzuela $468.05 Meeting Expense Relmb. 14474 Paula A.Zeller $368.74 Training Expense Reimb. 14475 County of Orange $2.790.00 Sewer Service Fees Admin. 14476 Dell Computer Corporation B Brad Cagle $2,91B0.12 Employee Computer Loan Program 14477 James E.Hauler $2.314.79 Employee Computer Loan Program 14478 Stephen V.Kozak $330.00 Training Expense Reimb. 14479 Orange Computer Systems 6 Victor Salinas $1,542.92 Employee Computer Loan Program 14480 Orange County Sanitation District $406.34 Petty Cash Reimb. 14481 Cooper Cameron Corporation $650.00 Engine Supplies 2, 74,950.57 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meetlng sae Tolo/m/ Dr. io�ze�se AGENDA REPORT Rem MMM I rrem Meer Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwi , Director of Engineering Originator: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: QUITCLAIM A 206 SQ FT PARCEL OF OCSD EASEMENT TO CURRENT LANDOWNER, GARY GUMBERT, 22011 HULA CIRCLE, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to execute a Quitclaim Deed for a 206 sq ft parcel of existing OCSD sewer easement to the current landowner, Gary Gumbert, 22011 Hula Circle, Huntington Beach, California 92646, in a form acceptable to General Counsel. SUMMARY OCSD currently owns a 40-foot wide easement in Banning Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. This easement was obtained for the construction of the Miller- Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-1, completed in 1959. Several years later, a residential housing tract was built in the vicinity of Magnolia Street and Banning Avenue. The City of Huntington Beach has since widened Banning Avenue and realigned Magnolia Street. This resulted in a curved alignment for Magnolia Avenue and increased the back yard potential for Mr. Gumbert. Mr. Gumbert wants a 206 sq ft parcel of land in his back yard quitclaimed to him so that he can expand his usable space currently encumbered by an easement. All of the existing Contract No. 3-1 pipeline and manhole structures are currently in the public right of way in Banning Avenue. There is no longer a need for the portion of this easement adjacent to Banning Avenue in the rear of Mr. Gumbert's property. None of the existing OCSD underground structures are within ten feet of the edge of the new proposed property line of Mr. Gumbert. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) G N1pbWNpnW plll FWti11oM BNMO]a'O11 XW.M tp$pO.Jrc Rry emm Page 1 r ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The City of Huntington Beach also owns a local sewer and a street easement at the rear of Mr. Gumbert's property, concurrent with the OCSD easement. The City is willing to vacate a portion of their easement to Mr. Gumbert. The City and OCSD have determined that the small portion of the overall easement that will be vacated or quitclaimed to Mr. Gumbert is not necessary for continued operation and maintenance of either sewer. Mr. Gumbert acquired an appraiser who states that the additional property from the quitclaimed OCSD easement would typically add approximately $200 to the overall value of his property. Mr. Gumbert is agreeable to pay OCSD the sum of $200 in exchange for the right to acquire the property unencumbered from the existing easement. That property, 206 sq ft, is less than two-tenths of one percent of the size of land in the original 106,832 sq ft easement for which the District paid a sum of$7,350 in May 1961, That 206 sq ft portion represents less than 400 in 1961 dollars. In exchange for the quitclaim deed, Mr. Gumbert will pay$200 as the value of the easement, plus OCSD legal costs estimated at up to $1,000. Staff requests approval to quitclaim the 206 sq ft portion of the easement to Mr. Gary Gumbert in a form acceptable to General Counsel. ALTERNATIVES Deny the quitclaim request. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Map of Assessor's Parcel No. 114481-14 2. Quitclaim Exhibit Showing Magnolia Street and Banning Avenue and Easements 3. Exhibit 'A'— Legal Description for Quitclaim 4. Exhibit 'B' —Sketch of Quitclaim of Easement 5. Appraisal Report CFW:jam G:WglobaMgenda Ural)ReporlsUalrll Boardsl22011 Hula.AR 102898.Ex G�1Il Mach Dna Rehr anla rft 11 HWa AR 102Mdx R-. � Page 2 tl096368Y AL1000 30V vtl0 IilwtlAdUOJ '03AVisiu 61MNtl T1V'03'!000tld3tl 88 O110N x 6380 U3N10 k,.U1'OBVfI ANl'C'aaOEBY 80N R0Ytl000Y BL O1 BY 3'a{/lYtlY000N mw.400 aoo 3ONVUO tl0i ONVC3WGYM dVV"16 A a PO f 6b I g 3NV7 �1 J J n J� • a 3oa a a a s ry /•��� 1+ ,og ,09 f.N+e e2�r,e Ay m a 3ND"7 � NdSns UP O ° O O O S . O 'R 1 q O ® a f! N II r a 1S Y" NI '` Ivi YV 1 rYY� ^y 'IW i -- 'V" + Y • N 'C � tlY lyq w .0 ° - - : REASON BLVERLY F TR •22091 SUSAV LN N- RES 1270-I 2N91 SUSAiI IN MTA FnILETA ROBE •.IUNTINGTON DEACH.CA 9264{ 1 1 4-4 8 1-0 7 19{5 6-]-Y.0 10/t6/90 J6 994 IIVNI INOTOM j N TR_3903 LOT 223 - -(716)-962_8475- ATACHD- 6,969 90.569670-0 SI.i57 80,I51-78 N TR 5903 L( WHITE ROSE RI TR •22072 XULA CIR H- RES 1459-1 t2072 HUTA CIR II1P NL N'EIIIY E •lIL91T1 NO ION BEACH.CA 92e 46 114-481 - 08 1964 6-5-2.0 2.07/9L 19.417 •IIC11T:4:-•'.< N 14 3403 _QT 12. (714) Y00-6740 ATACHD 7.500 9e-060103-Q 28.623 43.035.75 i jN IR 394 Lt i ______ _______ ______________________________ ___ __________________________________ ____________SASS I ---------- MITE HUNT NGTONT •220/2 IIVl4 CIR H- RES 1459-1 11012 HULA CI4 H16 MC NEILLY EV •NtW fINOTON DEACN,CA 92646 1 1 4-4 8 1 -0 8 1964 6-3-Y.0 Y/07/96 19.412 +IIUNTINGION 11 TR 3103 LOT 222 N/C17141 960-8740 ATACHD 7.300 96-060103-Q 28,62Et 48.035-75 I N TR 3903 LD -YAMS--------------------+RYAN. DANA _-_------ WE RES IJtt-1 22052 HULA CIR HTB CASiI LAS JO !YAM !OWN •9331 TpMITI 22032 HVIA CIR •HUNTINGTON DEACH,CA 92646 1 1 4-4 8 1-0 9 1964 6-3-2.0 6/21104 172.I t2 260,5 N TR 3903 lO 14 IR 3903 tOT 221 OARAOE 4,400 94-410231-0 5A,313 730.3DD-a3 A,U a •Sol KuI L..`1 IY 4 -4 --RES /639-1 72042 HULA CIA Illy I L93ILl AS JUII IL'USIA 03LOCn 92627 1 1 4-4 8 1 - 1 0 19e3 6-4-2.0 2434107 6.950e 55.0 I .9331 TA41 TI N TR 3905 LOT 220 171U 646-6I11 ATACHD 6,000 12434186! 46.950 e5,23r-ie . IN TR ---- LC . _____. __________________________________________ _________-________-__-___-______________ _______ADDS_ •HUNEV TONBEEN ANN •22101 JONESI`OR1 IN RES 123-2. 22022 NULA CIR IITp R UNTIN ON WE IR INDTON BEACN.CA 92646 114-481TACHD 11 1964 6-]-2.0 6/YEH4 17.e79 •NUR_3103ON ' i N IR ----SIP3 LOT --- ------ ----4 ----------Q ------ 108.7J.... N TR 3903 l0 _ ___._._SANS. ._ _ ASD _ _______________________________________________________________________ __ MASTERSON J• ANDS_ __ANDS_ ._-________:____________________ j GRAVES JOXN TAD GRAVES. MEL INDA %AV X- RES 7-4-3. 72012 HULA CIR HTB .HUNTINDTON 1 22012 IIUl4 C14 •XIMTINOTON BEACN,CA 92646 1 1 4-4 8 1 - 1 2 1964 7-6.3.0 11/16/93 84,4292 N TR 3903 l0' N TR 3903 l01 118 ATACHD 3 1,860 9]-786578-0 1A4.6t9 600.021-v3 _ ______._______-.____.__ HISS _______.__-_. •22001 HULA CIR ----_----H RES ItJS-1 tt001 HULA CIR IIID DIXON NANCY i -HMTIE MARCEI 9' TR •9361 TAHITI N I111 3903 LOTS 217,CA 92e46(7141 962-76178 ATACHD3 1914 /�0l5•e 91'SI1490-0 2 NN" 45.524.75 N TR 3103 LOI __________________________________________________________............._____________________________________ --------- D7 i LOURTIE MARCEL F •22001 HULA CIR N- RES 1135-1 2Y101 HUl4 CIR HTp GREENBERTOH E HlD1tINO1pN pE4CN,C4 92646 1 1 4-4 B 1 - 1 3 1964 a-3-t.0 6/IB/91 11,372 N 1R 1903 l01 N TR 3903 LOT 217 HIC(714) 962-7617 ATACHD 7.GA5 91:311490-0 25.952 45.524-75 ------------- ____________ _ __________________________._____-_-_________ ORANGE, CA_ _ ______________________________________________R17 __ ------ ORANGE. CA. ]{S E� \aliHnx'idc I -80I- 345-7334\!•17E 1 qll IC p®• ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST 96.97 EDITION ����pp OWNER ADDRESS ! CARE OF E%-z10 PARCEL N G . VEAR ROOMTCTF UNITS SITUS ADDRESND S TFR VACITY OMMER HC/STS PHONF. D4R%ING /. P LOISI2E DOCUMENI-% IHP VAl FULL VAL-VR OUMDERT GARY L 42011 NUTA CIR 11- RES 165E-1 22011 HULA CIR LIED ADOMD 010%. ML'NT INOTCI7 T 2CH,CA 9264e 1 1 4-4 8 1 - 1 4 IH 64 9.4-2.0 Ili21/90 71.7082 3S0,0 •IIIIRI I9GION A N TR 19C] LOT 216 ATACHD 1 9,7/0 90-61756 t-G 71,708 255.000-9i N lk ---- - ________ ___________------------------------------------ ____________---- _____________________________ _____________ -NINE nMMg3 J •t2071 HVl4 CIR H• RES It]5-1 tt021 HVIA CIR HTP Eli%ER POI INA NINEINOIN BCH.CA 92646 1 1 4-4 8 1 - 1 5 1966 6-S-2.0 8/31172 19,409 32.5 • MEN ONNER N IR 31.3 LOT 215 (7141 963-5142 DTACHD 1 5.810 103050029 34.738 54.147-75 R IR 390.1 LO1 _________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ SAND--_ADDS__ P22441 FA CI R •MUMTIRA, MIBEACH. R H- RES 1196-1 229g1 MULA C1R ON SANDERS LEE 22E 41 NDL4 CIR •IIIINTik,YON pE4CH.Lq 92646 114-481 - 1D N65 6-]-2.0 A- S/96 59. 332 20,00 IIIR INOTON 0! N IR 3903 IGf 314 ATACHD 6,100 94-12]6aP 59.i63 210.000-94 N IR .9903 l01 _ONES_-______. ElY JDN DUgNE - -------•EI V. CYNTHIq JEAN MEST--H----------- -------------- RES 1668-3 22051 HULA CIR NTB JOKES A4IIIUR N2111 3903 HULA LO11 t03 •HLNIINGTON 5EACH,C 92146(714) 964-85866 OARAGE 481-- 17 1964 6,098.5 92-172809-5 64, 40 240.000-93 WE 39030LOT _______ ___________ .-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _______ -IMB4ll LA CIRII C •HINTING. N BEAC7TE M H- RES 1468-1 22N1 HULA CIR IHP lE0NA4D O11Y1 210/1 NUII CIR •NIMTINOTON DEACH,C4 92646 1 1 4-4 8 1. '- 1 8 1964 6-3-2.D 10/12/93 ORTJERRCHAD63,196t NME 9031 DI N TR 3903 LOT 211 -----AACH0 6.---EEG 91-691S61-G ------ ---------- jN iR ---- --- --------------------_-----------------------------------_-------------_____------------_____________________________________________ 1 _____________. N9002MCH STINE L X JR •MDR TINER. JANETTE C N- RES 1306•I 9002 CHRISTlNE DR HID LEONARD DONEE •900t 905 LOT 2 1 •HUNTINGTON BEACH.0 92646 1 1 4-4 8 1 - 1 9 1963 6-3-2.0 11/18/9] 200.602 262.5 NUNTINOTON & N TR 39 D3 LOt 211 GARAGE 6,098 9s-79514/-0 104,430 305.032-96 N TR 3903 LOT ___._-_-__.___________ ___.___________________________________----- ___ _------------ .___-______-______________-_ _-________-__. B14VKT CON •9012 Cltl9IS 11NE O% RES 1Y35-1 9012 CHRISTIRE OR NtP PMUNII NnRGIt IIUNIINO3 L TEACX.CA 92646 1 1 4-46 1 -2 0 1964 6-5-2.0 9/1]/84 19 412 •IIUNIINOTN 0C> N TR 3903 LOT 2I0 (7141 847-2346 ATACHD 6.052 Sq-JS]195-V 78.-96 --------- N TE39031.01 ---- --- __________________________________WITS_ _---_________E .902A4I KOUROSISTINEH -HUNTING NFARIMDEAC H- RES 1139�17-4-2. 9032 CHRISTINF OR WITS IMUN tkN 90z7 CI14ISTINE OR +HUNT/4C{OM PEACH.C4 9t6N 1 1 4-4 8 1 -C 1 1965 7-662.0 11/12/86 140.8�3 119.0 HUHLIN'03L PE N •R 3993 lCl 209 ATACHD 5.662 86-55213I.0 /9,573 .ID.Se6-A7 N IR 3903 IGf ___ ___________________-----------------_----------______-------------------------------------.---------. ._.. - .- . .. . EXHIBIT PARTIAL OUITCLAIM OF EASEMENT n/ MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER Lli RIW &4 I a AVENUE r r-vw.t_ r v wa. i L ,\MH '-- MILLER_HOLDER TRUNK SEWER_ LOT 216 LOT 217 -MAIcT No. 3903 M.M. 165/48-50 LEGEND: PROPOSED STREET VACATION ® PROPOSED QUITCLAIM AREA 09/01/1998 16:50 1149bblbdV EXHIBIT ' A' OUTACLAM OF A PORAON OF 7HE EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN BOOK 5739, PAGE 796, O.R. (MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER,, CONTRACT NO. 3-1) THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF THE EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN FINAL JUDGEMENT OF CONDEMNATION NO. 79885, RECORDED MAY 25. 1961 IN BOOK 5739, PACE 796 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE CITY OF HUNRNGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALI- FORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS., BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2. BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF BANNING AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF TRACT NO. 3903. FILED IN BOOK 165. PAGES 48, 49 AND 50 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0038'30' WEST'16.J4 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, WITH A RADIUS OF 390.00 FEET, A RADAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 16'11'IO' WEST; THENCE SOUTH- EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0(731'32'. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 3.58 FEET TO A POINT THROUGH WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 15'J9'S8' WEST,• THENCE SOUTH 31'30'00- EAST 7.20 FEET AND SOUTH 68'572C' FAST 25.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 216 OF SAID TRACT NO. 3903, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL I OF S410 EASEMENT,. THENCE. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 216 AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINES OF SAID PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF SAID EASEMENT, SOUTH 89'32'40' WEST 30.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ENCOMPASSING A COMPUTED AREA OF 206 SQUARE FELT ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 'B' ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. eS��1Lf.0 pFdr Nm Ep 9-]0.01 JrA/ror C� 8131198 i 89/01/1998 16:58 114ybbjb88 EXHIBIT ' B' OfOaNM OF A PCRnON OF THE EASEMENT OESMEM /N BOOK 57J9, PACE 794 OA (MAYER-HOLDER TR(TNK MMM CONFLICT NO. J-1) N W BANNING AVENUE h O 2 I I PAR. 2 I PAR. .1 A=00'Jt'32' R=J90.00' L=3.58' 5739-796 0. R, 51611'IO'W(RAD) 515'3@'38'W(RAO) I p ------------- 531'30'00'E 7.20' "bi o I b- SSB,J,r�O. aoa g F 2M 50. A. ?sue ------- —————— 589'3740'W 30.35' TRACT N0. 3903 M.M. 165 / 48\\ — 50 \ LOT 215 \\ LOT 217 F. A Eq.9-17-01 k 1105 ! 8131198 SUMMIT APPRAISALS mm am5m- AFTYRUMBPRT Bery1Y. TAIL NUTA CWCI.E lflj�NIMAYRI6BN ANNF SUBJECT: T MBJELTOFTNISM'AL"MMAMRTIONOFPARCELSISFOFTM M3CURRENTLYHELOAS AN EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN ATTACHED ADDENDUM EYNIBITS'A'A'F. REQUEST: WE SUBJECT OWNER REQUESTED"ANALYSIS TO DETFRMOETHE FAIR MARKET VALUE OFA AB SOFT. ADJACENT PLOTAGE OF RAJA AS OUTUNED IN EKMI9ITs A'N V. SOE MARKET VALUE WE SITE IN QUESTION 0ONLY MS TOTAL SQUARE FEET OF AREA AND MOLDS NO REAL UTBJTY.THEREFORE, NO VALUE ON ITS OWN IN THE GENERAL REAL ESTATE MAR1ETPIACE FROCE99 OF EVALUATING LOT SEE DIFFERENCES FOR TRACT HOMES: WNEN EVALUATPIG THE LOT VALUE OF SFR TRACT MOME9, A LOMPAR610N OF RECENTSOAIAN 9A1E5 VATUNTHESUBJECTSREJEVENTMARKETMEAMUSEDTOOFJFAMINETHEBREVALUEry EMPO LEI ANDADJU9TME ARENAOEFORODTERENCESWICCHMFJURACTEDOYAPAOEOSALESANALYSIS STUDY RED WE MYTO FRJO fECETYT COMPS WRH SOALM LARGE LOTS TO DETERMUETEADWIIONAL VALUE JF ANY.OF THE I WR LOT THE TYPICAL ADJUSTMENT FOR LOT SIZE DIFFERENCES IN TRACT HOMES IS APPROXIMATELY F1.00 FUR SQUARE FOOT FOR DIFFERENCES OVER 1.0W SQUARE FEET, MARK@ VALUECONCLUSIONOF ADOOIG TOP SOFY.TO THE SUBJECT LOT BUT VAUJE: F THE SUBJECT SUE AQUIRED THE ADDTIIONAL M SOFT.FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY AS NOTED IN EXHIBITS A A'B' WE OVERALL SUM WOULD CHJUIGE FROM AFPNOL RT00 SOFT.RPM FORM RECOR09I TO 9.9611 WUFI THE SURROAMOMG NEIONBORNOOO LOT SQES RINOE FROM APPROXIMATELY%ms F, AND UP,THEREFORE.THE ADDNpN U.M S WbUID TYRCAUEY ADD APPROXMATELY$2MOO TO THE OVOW L VILLUE TO THE PROPERTY.NOMtYEILY HEN FACTORING M THE E[ORBOANT COST OF MOVPIG THE BLOCK WALL IN ORDER FOR THE SUBJECT SITE TO UT WE ABMBNAL SOFT.THE NET EFFECT ON WE SUBJECT PROPEFUAY WOULD BE NO ADDED MARIET VALUE VALUE RECAP: 14 ON AE OWN THE SITE HAS NO M UKET VALUE L)PICREA9WOTHE SUBJECT LOT SUM SOS 90"{OFFSET BYTHE COST OF MOWNG THE BEACH WALLI WOULD ADD NO MARKET VALUE TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SINCERELY. LOU AMPINATO STATE CER161ED APPRAISER NC 1PAR01V IT tutus r s.nr u�..�s.��,r aw Fp mmr BOARD OF DIRECTORS raemng Dace I To]t.Bae. 1g-28. AGENDA REPORT I Mon Numbe I ID! 0NUMW Orange County Sanitation DI FROM: David Lud i , irector of Engineering Originator: Joe Rycraw, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-1, DAY ANNEXATION (DA 98-5)TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (FORMERLY REFERRED TO AS ANNEXATION NO. 153 TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 IN OTHER CORRESPONDENCE) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition from David and Carol Day to annex 0.751 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity of Cowan Heights at the intersection of Highcliff Drive and Brier Lane; (2)Adopt a resolution authorizing initiation of annexation of said territory to the District. SUMMARY On April 22, 1998, the District received a request from David and Carol Day to annex a 0.751-acre parcel located at 10012 Highcliff Drive to the District. The Days are constructing a new home on the site and plan to connect to the public sewer. This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.B tax exchange for annexing properties, Board approved and effective March 14, 1989. Under this tax exchange, the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and, instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The annexation fee of$5,970 includes the following: $3.982 District annexation acreage fee (minimum one acre) $ 250 State Board of Equalization processing fee $ 500 District processing fee $ 38 California Environmental Quality Act fee $ 100 District Revenue Area No. 7, area-wide planning study fee of$100 per acre (minimum one acre) LL.J.QQ Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) processing fee, normally collected by the District, paid by applicant's contractor Russ Smith directly to the agency. $5,970 Total Annexation Fee c�eiowivo..e.o,.n R.00.wuom m.wv......uo.i iozeeo aoo Page 1 T PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ These items have been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives. CEOA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Map 2. Legal Document RJR:jep:jo CNpWUMpmOa PaR Rw1{VilIIPNMI�nMa W 11VIBNM Page 2 lock 5853 Module 97 EXHIBIT "A" ,V, 5953 07 ANNEXATION OCSD N0. 1 - DAY ANNEXATION(DA 98-5) TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1 IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. STATE OF 2 CALIFORNIA,AND BEING THAT PORTION OF LOT 13 OF TRACT NO. 3021,AS 3 SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 92 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS AT PAGES 5 4 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID 5 COUNTY,AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 6 COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF BRIER LANE(FORMERLY 7 COWAN HEIGHTS DRIVE), 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT 8 NO. 3021, SAID POINT BEING ALSO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EXISTING 9 BOUNDARY OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, 10 AS ESTABLISHED BY THE MAUDE ANNEXATION DATED JULY 2, 1969,SAID ANGLE I POINT BEING ALSO THE NORTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN 12 COURSE THEREIN DESCRIBED AS SOUTH 32'1T 24'EAST 20.00 FEET;THENCE 13 LEAVING SAID EXISTING BOUNDARY AND ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, NORTH 14 32'17'24'WEST 15.18 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, 15 CONCAVE EASTERLY,AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET;THENCE 16 CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE AND SAID CURVE,THROUGH A CENTRAL 17 ANGLE OF 83'10' 11', NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY AN ARC 16 DISTANCE OF 174.19 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, 19 NORTH 50'52'4T EAST 126.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, 20 CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY,AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET;THENCE 21 CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE AND LAST SAID CURVE,THROUGH A 22 CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11'01'22", NORTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 76.95 23 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, NORTH 39"51'25'EAST 24 122.54 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF HIGHCLIFF 25 ' DRIVE.40.00 FEET IN WIDTH,AS SAID INTERSECTION IS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT 26 27 28 SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS i EXHIBIT "A" / ANNEXATION OCSD NO. 1 - DAY ANNEXAT ION (DA 98-5) TO V ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT I NO. 3021; THENCE ALONG LAST SAID CENTERLINE. SOUTH 42'30' 52' EAST 2 69.50 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE NORTH- 3 EASTERLY,AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 350.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING 4 ALONG LAST SAID CENTERLINE AND SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 5 OF 04'52' 12', SOUTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 29.75 FEET TO A POINT 6 TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 42.36' 56-WEST,SAID POINT BEING 7 THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION;THENCE CONTINUING 8 ALONG LAST SAID CENTERLINE AND SAID CURVE,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 9 OF 18'45'58", SOUTHEASTERLY 114.63 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY 10 PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN ON 11 THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 74, PAGE 17, RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE 12 OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,A RADIAL LINE THROUGH 13 SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 23'50'58"WEST;THENCE LEAVING LAST SAID 14 CENTERLINE AND SAID CURVE SOUTH 23'50'58'WEST 20.00 FEET ALONG SAID 15 NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE TO THE 16 MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 13, SAID MOST EASTERLY CORNER 17 BEING ALSO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2, SAID POINT 13 BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID 19 HIGHCLIFF DRIVE;THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND ALONG THE 20 SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 13 AND PARCEL 2, SOUTH 23'50'58"WEST 21 176.45 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 13 AND PARCEL 22 2;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 13 AND PARCEL 2, 23 NORTH 83'49'01"WEST 120.70 FEET;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY 24 LINE OF SAID LOT 13 AND PARCEL 2, NORTH 31'31' 16'WEST 71.81 FEET TO 25 THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF,SAID PARCEL 2;THENCE LEAVING SAID 26 27 28 11 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS EXH'BIT "A" `Y ANNEXATIONOCSD NO. 1 - DAY ANNEXATION (DA 98-5) TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1 SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 13 AND PARCEL 2.AND ALONG THE 2 NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, NORTH 39"51'25" EAST 199.68 3 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2, SAID POINT BEING 4 ALSO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID 5 HIGHCUFF DRIVE, SAID POINT BEING ALSO A POINT ON A CURVE, CONCAVE 6 NORTHEASTERLY,AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 370.00 FEET,A RADIAL LINE 7 THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 42"36'56"WEST;THENCE ALONG LAST 8 SAID RADIAL LINE, NORTH 42°36'56" EAST 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF 9 BEGINNING. 10 11 THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 0.751 ACRES. ATTACHED 12 AND MADE A PART OF IS A MAP DESIGNATED AS EXHIBIT"B". 13 14 4 COOK R.C.E..E. 31 31570 Co 15 EXP. 12-31-2000 c ,1190 16 17 • OFCPVF 18 19 THIS MAP DOES MEET THE APPROVAL OF 20 THE ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE. 21 ,,.�� 22 DATED T 5117 AY OF -� , 1998 v 23 °' + BY 24 J A A S EYOR �, 4�OfCAtA� 25 26 27 28 SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS block 585I module 97 EXHIBIT 595J 07 ANNEXATION II I10 OCS . ] - NY ANNEXATION (BA98-5) ttl ORANGE COUNTY SANt'fMPIUH DISTPICf � 9 o IS Sow LEGEND LLLILJI -ESEXING T LINE -ANNEXATION BOUNDARY LINO .O xH Corr � ...sPI%is ti Dnae• y" wu•uaam�frul... mm' �`Tr PEIVE 0 C k lI rAa Cu .w �� 1 Aral c �. I PA SD CD�y of N ,W Y,Y V1 d 1 A, PREPARED BYt $ P cc TPITNNIE ENGINEERING OULEV ARD COSTA MESA, CAEWPORT A.926IY IVCe.AI 17161 662-766I k \ P \ THIS PLAN PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF. N \ J 12-3 4 ORY J. COCA P.C.8.31570 <• \ Q�' UP. ua1-I000 R,6W r 4 aA rir'W J / TNIS HAP DOES NECT THE APPROVAL OF TI16 ORANGE COUNTY SV��PV��B�YIlOP��'E OPP1C6. y.10yW yb DATED IIS•Z DI�NR'c ,1998. I I�MY O BBpyl BYUN *� CAMAS, COU SURVEYOR ' 4 SHEET I OF 1 SNEET BOARD OF DIRECTORS meetng DaW To ad.of DI" to/ze/se AGENDA REPORT Rem Numbv l4m Numbe Orange County Sanitation Distract FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Joe Rycraw, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-2, PORTION OF TRACT NO. 14185. VISTA DEL SOL ANNEXATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT(OCSO) (DA 96-17) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. ; ordering Annexation No. OCSD-2, Portion of Tract No. 14185, to OCSD, 7.025 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Country Hills Road in the City of Anaheim. SUMMARY On July 7, 1997, the District received a request from Reza Dadashi of Boulevard Development to annex subject portion of Tract No. 14185 to the District. This tract consists of 13 residential lots. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re: A.B. 8; a tax exchange for annexing properties, approved by the Board of Directors on March 14, 1989. Under this tax exchange, the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and instead collects a higher annexation fee that includes the following: $ 500.00 District Processing Fee $ 1,950.00 LAFCO Processing Fee $ 250.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee $ 28,156.20 District Annexation Acreage Fee $ 38.00 California Environmental Quality Act Fee $ 30,894.20 Total Annexation Fee \boOaM1V aL1NpIohaMpan4a Doh 21118pB.Orc RmWtl Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT This item has been budgeted. (Line ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This annexation was initiated before the District consolidation. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Exempt ATTACHMENTS LAFCO Resolution No. 96-17 RJR:jo MotalMatel IWlooaMoenda Draft Repoi6Vunl B nn-No 2111 Wo8 tla Rene.. &Hl9B Page 2 w DA 96-17 RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE VISTA DEL SOL ANNEXATION TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 2, 1998 On motion of Commissioner Huntley,duly seconded and carried,the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the proposed annexation to the Orange County Sanitation District, designated as "Vista del Sol Annexation to the Orange County Sanitation District"(DA 96-17), was heretofore filed with and accepted for filing on August 26,1998 by the Executive Officerof this Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Title 5,Division 3,commencing with Section 56000 et seq of the Government Code; and WHEREAS,the Executive Officer,pursuant to Government Code Section 56838 set September 2, 1998 as the hearing date of this proposal; and WHEREAS,the Executive Officer,pursuant to Government Code Section 56833 has reviewed this proposal and prepared a report including her recommendation thereon,and has furnished a copy of this report to each person entitled to a copy; and WHEREAS,the proposal consists of the annexation to the Orange County Sanitary District and the concurrent annexation to the Orange County Sanitation District Special Zone No. 2;and WHEREAS,this Commission on September 2, 1998 considered the proposal and the report of the Executive Officer,and considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant to this proposal,including,but not limited to,factors specified in Government Code Section 56841; and WHEREAS,this Commission called for and held a public hearing on the proposal on September 2, 1998,and at the hearings,this Commission heard and received all oral and written protests,objections and evidence which were made,presented or filed,and all persons present were given an opportunity to hear and be heard with respect to this proposal and the report of the Executive Officer;and WHEREAS,information satisfactory to this Commission has been presented that all the owners of land within the proposed territory have given their written consent to the annexation; and Resolution No. 96-17 1 v WHEREAS,pursuantto the California Environmental Quality Act,the Commission certifies that it has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by the City of Anaheim. NOW, THEREFORE, the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE and ORDER as follows: Section 1. The proposal is approved subject to the following terms and conditions. a) Payment by the applicant of State Board of Equalization fees. b) The applicant agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify LAFCO and/or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against LAFCO and/or its agents,officers and employees to attack,set aside,void orannul the approval of LAFCO concerning this proposal or any action relating to or arising out of such approval when such action is brought within the applicable statute of limitations. c) The effective date shall be the date of recordation. Section 2. The annexing area of 7.025 acres is found to be uninhabited,is within the County of Orange,and is assigned the following distinctive short-form designation:"Vista del Sol Annexation to the Orange County Sanitation District"(DA 96-17). Section 3. The Commission authorizes conducting authority proceedings be waived in accordance with Government Code Section 56837(c). Section 4. The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this resolution as provided in Section 56853 of the Government Code. AYES: COMMISSIONERS HUNTLEY, STEINER, WILSON, WITHERS, AND HERZOG,AND VICE-CHAIR SMITH,AND CHAIR BRESSETTE NOES: NONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Resolution No. 96-17 2 V I,DANA M.SMITH,Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County,California,hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by said Commission at a regular meeting thereof,held on the V day of September, 1998. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this V day of September, 1998. DANA M. SMITH Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commissio sy: Dana M. Smith F:I AFC0%De9&IM .wpd Resolution No. 96-17 3 GMC Gr thAdonagement Company _ A division ofSzeed 1m imena,Inc Q o 12362 Beach Bhd Suite 110 Stanton,CA 9O680 (714)181-4400 Far(714)890-4869 O Block 6154 LNl _ ZI Modules 71,72,81,82 9 i.� EXHIBIT `A' ANN=TION NO. 76 (DA 96-17) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 That portion of Section 6, Township 4 South, Range 8 West, San 2 Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of 3 California, being a portion of Tract No. 14185, as per moo filed in Book 4 699, Pages 20 through 24 inclusive of Miscellaneous Mans in the O£fice of 5 the County Recorder of said County described as follows: 6 7 BEGINNING at a point in the existing boundary line of County Sani- 8 tation District No. 2 (CSD No. 2) as established by "Annexation No. 69", 9 said paint being the intersection of the southwesterly line of said 10 annexation with the southeasterly line of "Annexation No. 29" to said 11 District, said point also being the most northerly corner of Tract ' No. 12 14185; THENCE along said existing boundary line oar the southwesterly 13 line of said "Annexation No. 69" and the northerly line of said Tract 14 through the following described courses: South 39^05129" East, 98.90 15 feet; THENCE South 46.53.19" East, 86.84 feet; TRENCE South, 81^23'09" 16 East, 646.76 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Tract; THENCE 17 leaving said existing boundary line following along the easterly Line of 18 said Tract South 6^37.51" East, 160.97 feet to an angle point in said 19 existing boundary line of CSD No. 2 as established by -Annexation No. 20 30^, said point being the northeast corner of said annexation; THENCE 21 along said existing boundary line per the northerly line of said 22 annexation through the following described courses: South 7B^09'02" West, 23 195.77 feet; THENCE South 89^40.17^ west, 100.18 feet; THENCE South 24 89^40'17" West, 31.93 feet; THENCE North 79°52'40" West, 198.52 feet; 25 THENCS North 77"29'29" West, 242.60 feet; THENCE South 83e17.35^ West, 26 301.97 feet; THENCE South 40^21'35^ West, 395.94 feet to a point in the 27 centerline of Count_-y Hill Road, 40.00 feet wide as shown on the map, of 28 said Tract, said centerline being a curve concave northeasterly and 29 having a radius of 300.00 feet, a radial line of said curve through said 30 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT 1XI ANUIMTION NO. '76 (DA 96-17) n COMITY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Y 1 point bears South 4T°42'21" West, said point also being the intersection 2 0£ the westerly line of said -Annexation No. 30" with a point on the 3 northeasterly line of "Annexation No. 16" to said District; THENCE 4 Westerly continuing along said existing boundary line, said northeasterly 5 Lime and said curve through a central angle of 23^53139" and an arc 6 distance of 125.11 feet; THENCE tangent to said curve North 24^24100" 7 West, 204.03 feet to a point in the northwesterly line of said Tract No. 8 14185; THENCE leaving said existing boundary line following along said 9 northwesterly line of said Tract through the following described courses: 10 North 91°33'04" East, 188.75 feet; THENCE South 31°16' Sa" East, 38.02 it feet; THENCE�North 43•41'42" East 184.05 feec.to a point in said existing 12 boundary line of said CSD No. 2 as established by said "Annexation No. 13 290; THENCE following along said existing boundary line per said 14 annexation South 61°05'56" East, 107.96 feet and North 45-29'26" East, 15 207.57 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 16 17 The above described parcel contains 7.025 acres. 18 19 Attached and made a part hereof is a may designated as EXHIBIT 'B' . 20 21 22 23 24 25 Th's proposal does meet the. approval 26 of he Orange County Surva is Office. 27 28 Date thi• day o ,&.V-� 1997 29 30NVIZ 3D C Co y Surveyor \ONpI.IAN�SG 1 n 32 M� license expires 09/30/97 �50�`N CAry9s9G� 33 34 ¢ No.4406 y 35 36 IthrP.g130197 39 a aD 26492 OF CALF' Via\ y17) (7M 617.-a2113 Page 2 of 2 thHllSl I "f5" ' ANNEXATION No. 76 Cf 1 9(0- 171 1 BLOCK Glsa TO -COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT" Na. Z MOOULE 71,1Z,11,12 ��QpOFESSlpN4�_` I CITY O ANAMN.1,,4%,I 492 .-. .� SEC 6 T4° ROW ��l 2.1'9/R.300r)39.P J'>I• T�AYIt� ��NW'LYUN6 78.02, SPc \q7' �OFTRINEO 43• RAO \W S NE'lY LINE OF '1B4b54/47 E ` ANNEIA-1i SQ, SWILY I SE'LY ASsb• LINES OF ANNEX �1tSya;t Y4so\ r07S6,£�i PANNEY� *Za ANNEX. ANNEX. NO. 16 No. 30 1 Byo� PDCL kgTeTs7� \ N'LY UNEJ >�\ TQ 14TH5 T£Z4F- A"V,r ' OF ANNEX-A �s B � , 79e� .Fy/81Y� \ A,y r 5 �t N'LY LINED[ l✓}•S4g F'r. N9�f.6B. 1R 141£5 0 IN S3vy.F.B4. 6 Bq �• N t `0 0 y • �pHpl•UNp c No.4408 u+ 1 > * Exp.9/30197 A'LY LINE OF `3 OF ANNEX &JO SBY4O'17''W 3693' — — EYlrnN6 DISTRICT DOUNDAKY L101F�}.•i,•r \ No. lag AMUCUTU BOUNDARY" \ \ S fl9°46'l7"'A IW.Lfl"� � NE'lY � .t OF Tx 141£S \1 SUS='1.,'lOO. >, 'IYU 9 \ ENE6t� 1 / AU13EY.Na.71 ANNEX, tL34 THI .FMSALO MESTTHE APPROVAL 0 TV 0RAN6E UN Y SURVEYO OfFICE 'yam' "•rS6°]7'Sf Ib0.9'F' DA a I V OF f997 i SE'CY 04 OFZR WS5 �Nt COR ANNE*6.30 JOH ANAS COUN UR PLO 8y� JCENSE EXPIRES 91301r A{RtICEE AIl.MIK KE1Gq�i CDAi37k1249 W iil•7A00 LOc .'NTION rA1 - PUBLIC FACILITIES and RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GIS APPLICATIONS & MAPPING SERVICES a� S" 5y County Sanitation county Sanitation up .a / District 03 ANNEXATION *76 (DA 96_17) c / mo n District No . 2 NOTE: Na tehed area not included in C.S.D.d2 ANNEXATION No . 76 ( DA 96-17) Portion of Tract No. 14185 (MB 699-20/24) N to SCALE: 1 - 1DD0. County Sanitation District No. 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS •g ToaG.of ar. Ior7B 98 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Ikm mW Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David LuArector of Engineering Originator: Joe Rycraw, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-3, DEUTSCH ANNEXATION (DA 96-04) TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (OCSD) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. ; ordering Annexation No. OCSD-3, Deutsch Annexation (DA 96-04) to OCSD, 3.20 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Foothill Boulevard and East Lemon Heights Drive in the unincorporated area of Orange County. SUMMARY On September 3, 1997, the District received an annexation request from five individually owned inhabited single family residences and one residence under construction: • William Deutsch at 2086 S.E. Foothill Boulevard • Robert Pearson at 2121 S.E. Foothill Boulevard • James Bear at 2102 La Cuesta Drive • Fred L. Walker at 2133 La Cuesta Drive • Jane Vaughn at 2052 La Cuesta Drive • Walter Ward at 2012 La Cuesta Drive The Deutsch's are constructing a new single family home at 2086 Foothill Boulevard. The other five homeowners are on septic systems and plan to connect to the public sewer at a later date. GN,pbWNpmfPa110. par4Wnl�MMnnaNe J111BW Y[ qm� � Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re: A.B. 8; a tax exchange for annexing properties, approved by the Board of Directors on March 14, 1969. Under this tax exchange, the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and instead collects a higher annexation fee that includes the following: $ 500.00 District Processing Fee $ 950.00 LAFCO Processing Fee $ 250.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee $ 417.00 Area-Wide Planning Study Fee $ 16,604.94 District Annexation Acreage Fee $ 38.00 California Environmental Quality Act Fee $ 18,759.94 Total Annexation Fee The local sewering agency is Orange County Sanitation District. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This annexation was initiated before District consolidation. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Exempt ATTACHMENTS LAFCO Resolution No. 96-04. RJR:jo \1CaEelYdablNlycWMOenda onn Few,bvonl Bmk:ann..xa.a n+8%d. n^^� % Page 2 Y DA 96-04 RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE DEUTSCH ANNEXATION TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 2, 1998 On motion of Commissioner Huntley,duly seconded and carried,the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the proposed annexation to the Orange County Sanitation District, designated as "Deutsch Annexation to the Orange County Sanitation District"(DA 96-04),was heretofore filed with and accepted for filing on August 26, 1998 by the Executive Officer of this Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Title 5,Division 3,commencing with Section 56000 et seq of the Government Code; and WHEREAS,the Executive Officer,pursuant to Government Code Section 56838 set September 2, 1998 as the hearing date of this proposal; and WHEREAS,the Executive Officer,pursuant to Government Code Section 56833 has reviewed this proposal and prepared a report including her recommendation thereon,and has furnished a copy of this report to each person entitled to a copy; and WHEREAS,the proposal consists of the annexation to the Orange County Sanitary District and the concurrent annexation to the Orange County Sanitation District Special Zone No. 7; and WHEREAS,this Cormission on September 2, 1998 considered the proposal and the report of the Executive Officer, and considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant to this proposal, including,but not limited to, factors specified in Government Code Section 56841; and WHEREAS,this Commission called for and held apublic hearing on the proposal on September 2,1998,and at the hearings,this Commission heard and received all oral and written protests,objections and evidence which were made,presented or filed,and all persons present were given an opportunity to hear and be heard with respect to this proposal and the report of the Executive Officer; and WHEREAS,information satisfactory to this Commission has been presented that all the owners of land within the proposed territory have given their written consent to the annexation; and Resolution No.96-04 1 WHEREAS, the Executive Officer determines that this project is categorically exempt under Section 15319,Class 19 of the State of California Environmental Quality Act; NOW, THEREFORE, the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE and ORDER as follows: Section 1. The proposal is approved subject to the following terms and conditions. a) Payment by the applicant of State Board of Equalization fees. b) The applicant agrees to defend,hold harmless and indemnify LAFCO and/or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against LAFCO and/or its agents, officers and employees to attack, set aside, void or annul the approval of LAFCO concerning this proposal or any action relating to or arising out of such approval when such action is brought within the applicable statute of limitations. c) The effective date shall be the date of recordation. Section 2. The annexing area of 4.17 acres is found to be inhabited,is within the County of Orange,and is assigned the following distinctive short-form designation:"Deutsch Annexation to the Orange County Sanitation District'(DA 96-04). Section 3. The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District is designated as the conducting authority and is hereby directed to conduct proceedings without notice,hearing,or an election, pursuant to Government Code Sections 56837(a) (3),and in compliance with this resolution. Section 4. The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this resolution as provided in Section 56853 of the Government Code. AYES: COMMISSIONERS HUNILEY, STEINER, WILSON, WITHERS, AND HERZOG,AND VICE-CHAIR SMITH,AND CHAIR BRESSETTE NOES: NONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) as COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Resolution No. 96-04. 2 \9/ 1 I,DANA M. SMITH,Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County,California,hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by said Commission at a regular meeting thereof,held on the 2"d day of September, 1998. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of September, 1998. DANA M. SMITH Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation C iss' n By. ` Dana M. Smith F:LL FCMN96-03\R w.wpd Resolution No. 96-04 . 3 Y I Block: 5853 JUL 0 2 1996 2 Modules: 24&25 Am"no MIllp M 3 4 EXHIBIT "A" 5 ANNEXATION NO. 152—DEUTSCH ANNEXATION(DA 96-04) 6 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 7 8 PARCEL I: 9 That portion of that certain land in the Unincorporated Territory of the County of Orange, State 10 of California,being Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 87-349, as shown by the map recorded in book 275, 11 pages 18 and 19 of Parcel Maps, on file in the office of the County Recorder of said County, more 12 particularly described as follows: 13 Beginning at an angle point in the existing district boundary of Orange County Sanitation 14 District No.7 as established by"Annexation No.71-A Portion of Tract No.9615" (Annexation No.71) 15 to said District,said angle point being the Easterly terminus of that certain course described as"North 16 84"33'06" East, 199.18 feet"in said Annexation No. 71; ' S 17 Thence along said existing district boundary per Annexation No. 71, South 84°1 l'00" West, 18 19.74 feet to the Southwesterly corner of Parcel I of said Parcel Map 87-349; 19 Thence leaving said existing district boundary and along the boundary of Parcel I of said Parcel 20 Map 87-349,North 5"49'00" West, 15.00 feet; 21 Thence North 14"36'00" East, 154.39 feet toa point in said existing-district boundary of said 22 Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 as established by"Annexation No. 96-Hom"(Annexation No. 23 96)to said District,said point being 11.94 feet Westerly from the Easterly terminus of that certain course 24 described as"North 84°02'50" West, 148.23 feet"in said Annexation No. 96; 25 Thence along said existing district boundary per Annexation No.96,South 84"05'47"East, 11.94 26 feet; 27 Thence South 34054'07"East 308.81 feet to the Southeasterly comer of Parcel 2 of said Parcel 28 Map 87-349; Page 1 of 4 v 1 EXHIBIT"A^ 2 ANNEXATION NO. 152—DEUTSCH ANNEXATION (DA 96-04) ' 3 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 4 i 5 Thence leaving said existing district boundary and along the boundary of Parcel 2 of said Parcel 6 Map No. 87-349, South 28°24'49" West 16227 feet; 7 Thence South 50°4T23" West 15.00 feet to a point in said existing district boundary of said ; i 8 Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 as established by "Annexation No. 57 - Tract No. 8295 9 (Recorded)" (Annexation No. 57)to said District,said point being 39.13 feet Southeasterly along and 10 from the Northwesterly terminus of that certain course described as"South 39*01'35" East 106.08 feet" 11 in said Annexation No. 57; 12 Thence along said existing district boundary per Annexation No. 57,North 3991237" West 13 39.13 feet' 14 Thence North 23*24'51"West 37.04 feet to an angle point in said Annexation No. 71,said angle 15 point being the Southeasterly terminus of that terrain course described as"South 23"12'13"East,196.32 16 feet"in said annexation; s 17 Thence along said existing district boundary per Annexation No. 71,North 23"24'51" West is 196.32 feet to the Point of Beginning. 19 20 The above described parcel of land contains 0.97 acres,more or less. 21 { 22 PARCEL 2: - 23 That portion of that certain land in the Unincorporated Territory of the County of Orange,State 24 of California, being Lots 6 through 11 inclusive of Tract No. 670, as shown by the map recorded in 25 Book 20,pages 40 and 41 of Miscellaneous Maps,together with Parcel 2 of a parcel map recorded in 26 Book 104, pages 27 and 29, all on file in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more 27 particularly described as follows: 28 Page 2 of 4 y 1 EXDd1BIT"A" 2 ANNEXATION NO. 152—DEUTSCH ANNEXATION(DA 96-04) 3 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 4 5 Beginning at an angle point in the existing boundary line of Orange County Sanitation District 6 No.7 as established by"AmexationNo.96-Horn'(Annexation No.96)to said District,said angle point 7 being the Easterly terminus of that certain course described as South 84"02'50"East 157.55 feet"in said 8 Annexation No. %; 9 Thence following along said existing district boundary per Annexation No.96,South 84"05'47" 10 West, 157.60 feet; 11 Thence North 58"45'57" West 62.72 feet; 12 Thence North 32"00'49"West 9.02 feet to an angle point in said existing district boundary per I3 "Annexation No. 108-Mahoney" (A""eration No. 108) to said District, said angle point being the 14 Westerly terminus of that certain course described as "South 87"55'55" West, 95.04 feet" in said 15 Annexation No. 108; 16 Thence along said existing district boundary per said Annexation No. 108,North88°00'46"East, t 17 95.03 feet; 18 Thence North 73"17'49" East 93.00 feet; 19 Thence North 12"12'37"West 48.74 feet; - 20 Thence North 25"3521"East 20.00 feet 21 Thence South 64"2439"East 193.68 feet; 22 Thence North 58"20'13" East 110.00 feet to an angle point in the centerline of La Cuesta Drive, 23 as shown on said Tract Map No. 670; 24 Thence leaving said existing district boundary along the centerline of La Cuesta Drive, South i 25 28003 27" East 404.65 feet to the intersection of the centerline of said La Cuesta Drive and the 26 Northwesterly prolongation of the Northeasterly line of Lot 6 of said Tract No. 670; 27 Thence along said Northeasterly line and its Northwesterly prolongation, South 35"41'47"East 28 90.00 fect; Page 3 of 4 v 1 EXHIBIT"A" 2 ANNEXATION NO. 152—DEUTSCH ANNEXATION (DA 96-04) 3 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 4 5 Thence alone the Southeasterly line of said Lot 6 South 61°58'49" West 196.52 feet to a point 6 in said existing district boundary of said Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 as established by said 7 Annexation No. 96,said point being 79.74 feet Southeasterly from the Northwesterly terminus of that 8 certain course described as"South 51°4T08" East 239.75 feet' in said Annexation No. 96; 9 Thence along said existing district boundary per Annexation No.96 North 51 052'07"West 79.74 10 feet; 11 Thence North 34°54'07" West 423.22 feet to the Point of Beginning. 12 13 The above described parcel of land contains 3.20 acres,more or less. 14 15 All as shown on a map attached to and made a part hereof, designated as EXHIBIT"B". 16 17 This legal description was prepared under my direction and was compiled from record data. 18 19 By: o" oQQOFESSIpyq! Noel W. Torkelson, RCE 15308 4yTO �!\yc 20 21 Date: * E Na 3 0 J �Q 22 This proposal does meet the approval £Clvl OF CAi�`� of the Orange County Surveyor's Office for 23 John Canes�-,_}}Ci�ono Surveyor 24 Dated thisL4S'dayofI , 19% vPw 25 'Sewca' F�, 26 By: -tr.�1..1 &L.....«.e r,;. I Michael B. Emmons, P.L.S. 5899 sdtssse 27 Deputy County Surveyor 7 My license expires 12/31/96 �OF CA�h 28 .perv.ryuui-tea Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT "B" ANNEXATON NO. 152 - OEUTSCN ANNEXATNNI (OA 96-04) ( P IQTT ] 1 I TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT K. 7 LA CUES ° DRIVE .a w�PW4+aMn W1KKxl M4 •y.°.nwn fYMM. I I I I I r PCLI2 I M. Nrh 670 I I D t LL. ETB M.M. TV/40-01 I �I O LOT fi n wnn w:K•P n i PARCEL 2 I II�IY.' UUtl LOT 7 I ' PCL II y"•"~ Q I wd `P +v•�` I L,L. e,T9f26a O I\U<"l0i 9 I LOT 8 DECL PCL. 2 JUNE 11,TRUST960 r \��1T I'� I i1 ] (\ \\ \\ I L01 10 P.0.0. \Yr-0 EOT 11 PCL. 2 va•\r. RD eur. ±N rxoup uma M PMi°•um PCL. I + d.`•`.5'd1C. IL �a L VA 104/27-28 K +9IM Mtldt T " O Pa PARCEL. 1 PCL.z O 761078'.9V •�3. P.6� 87-569 M N. 'D75(]6-]9 \C•�1. PCL. I 1 '?- I:'i ] 7 rt +�+ �' +R. nx'�?s - x N..a� \\ s.a+.rs • 4'++ � Om' .x.n• ..w ,tea.. i vwv o6< LEGEND ANNFUTION UUZ TR. NO. 9615 38TR. N0. 8295 M.M. 2(20-21 M.M. C19/<5-6] a Pax rrY m ��-+F=1NA-"UU, YNNE v DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES COMBINED MEETING Wednesday, September 23, 1998 at 5 p.m. A meeting of the combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, September 23, 1998 at 5 p.m., in the DistricCs Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Board Thomas M. Dawes, Consultant Peer Swan, Vice Chair Kris Lindstrom, Consultant Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Ryal Wheeler Jan Debay, Chair, PDC Committee George Brown, Chair, FAHR Committee John Collins, Past Chairman of the Boards STAFF PRESENT; Bill Steiner, County Supervisor Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services David Ludwin, Director of Engineering AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Directors Present: Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer George Brown, Chair Peer Swan, Vice Chair Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Jan Debay, Chair, PDC Committee North Eckenrode, GWR Joint Coordinating Committee Member John Collins, Past Chairman of the Boards Bill Steiner, County Supervisor Directors Absent: (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. OCSD • P.O.am 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees d Meeting Page 2 September 23, 1998 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Ryal Wheeler addressed the Committee on his attendance at the meetings. He indicated that the meetings are beneficial to him because he can learn about how meetings are run. He also thanked the members for allowing him to attend. He also thanked the committee for allowing his son, Christopher, to attend and for making him feel welcome. Christopher is working on obtaining a Boy Scout merit badge. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the of the Combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committees Meeting of August 26, 1998 were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Burnie Dunlap did not make a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson reported on several issues on behalf of the General Manager, who was on vacation. • Kem County Board Of Supervisors Extend Urgency Biosolids Ordinance: Last week the Kem County Board of Supervisors approved an extension of the urgency ordinance to regulate the transport, use, monitoring, and record keeping of biosolids in Kem County. Kem County staff was directed to complete work on a permanent ordinance. They also rescinded the$51ton road mitigation fee, pending a supporting engineering report. A preliminary engineering report, prepared by an independent engineering firm, Martin-Macintosh, set the cost of all of the presently identified and needed road repair and upgrade costs at $15 to 16 million. The report assumed that 100% of the road damage was a result of biosolids hauling activities. General Counsel Tom Woodruff indicated that the actions being considered by the Kem County Supervisors can be challenged, and there are a lot of cases that are similar with favorable rulings. Staff plans to meet with each of the supervisors, as well as the engineering firm that prepared the traffic study. Staff was directed to continue to follow this ever-changing issue and report to the Steering Committee as necessary. • Sewage Spill on Pacific Coast Hinhwav: Staff received a copy of the Newport Beach police report on the Pacific Coast Highway spill. This spill resulted when a subcontractor to the gas company drilled through our force main. The police report identified the city as the victim, the Sanitation District as the suspect and the gas company as the witness. The report indicated that the problem resulted because the sewer line was incorrectly marked on the road. Bob i Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 3 September 23, 1998 Ghirelli is investigating what occurred in an effort to determine if standard reporting procedures were followed. He will prepare a report on his findings and the Steering Committee will be updated at the next meeting. • Comprehensive Listing of the User Rate Chanoes: Director Collins previously asked the Finance Department to provide a comprehensive listing of the user rate changes that all permitted users will experience as a result of the newly adopted user rates. The report has been placed in the Director's notebooks. • Executive Management Team Retreat: The Executive Management Team will be conducting a day and a half retreat on October 15 and 16. Discussion items include performance measurement techniques, managing staff capacity against work plan and task demands, broad banding, delegation of authority, DART and other reinvention initiatives throughout the District. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff provided a heads-up to the Steering Committee members on a request from the developer of the Boise Chloe area, Hearthside Homes, to assign our existing agreement with the landowner, Signal Boise, to a private water company that would provide sewer and water services. The existing agreement with Signal Boise, the landowner, provides that the District has a duty to service this area once the property is annexed to our service area. Mr. Woodruff outlined the options. No action was required by the Steering Committee at this time. (8) STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Reciprocal Representation on SAWPA Commission and OCSD Board of Directors Blake Anderson provided a briefing on the issues as requested by the Steering Committee in May. SAWPA has a new general manager and a new chairman. At this time, the SAWPA Commission is reconsidering its role in the region. The issues outlined in a draft White Paper may no longer be relevant. Staff was directed to continue to monitor the situation, and when SAWPA determines its role, revise the White Paper for further consideration by the Committee. B. The action items scheduled to be considered by the working committees in October were reviewed. (9) REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE CHAIR Chairman George Brown did not make a report. Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 4 September 23, 1998 (10) COMBINED STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES DISCUSSION ITEMS A. CEQA Issues Related to GWRS Project. OCWD's decision to proceed with 30% design before the EIR/EIS was adopted and before the District's Directors have voted to support the project was questioned. General Counsel indicated that preliminary engineering is not considered a project by CEQA. And the action taken by OCWD was to procure a consultant for the preliminary engineering. The actual work would probably not begin until after the EIR/EIS is certified because of the time required to solicit an RFP, review and evaluate the proposals and then award a contract. B. Review Quarterly Schedule of Events for Strategic Plan. There are no date changes since the last update. On November 5, the OCWD will release the Draft EIR/EIS for the GWRS Project. The next GWR Joint Coordinating Committee meeting is now scheduled for October 27. In November the regular GWR Joint Coordinating Committee meeting has been changed to November 22. (11) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were no other business, communications, or supplemental agenda items. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (14) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for October 28, 1998 at 5 p.m. (15) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:17 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Sections 54956.9(a)(2) and 54957, to discuss the General Manager's Evaluation and one item of significant exposure of litigation against the District. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. The minutes of a future Board Meeting will report on the actions when they are approved. Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 5 September 23, 1998 At 6:27 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:27 p.m. Submitted by: J)94i Tappan "ring Committee Secretary HWOYMpbtlM1SiFfRW4 CW1NrtiEflYfiKEPoW]YB SCANMinNu.Ez STEERING COMMITTEE MeetingDae rom.oroo-. ro/za/9s to/zsise AGENDA REPORT g"� nbe '�j'�y" Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Originator: Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding re Biosolids Delivery to Kern County GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Authorize approval of a Cost-sharing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), between OCSD and Kern County, to help mitigate and repair Kern County roads traversed by biosolids-hauling trucks. The MOU contains the following major elements: a. $2.12 per ton fee paid by OCSD for transported biosolids on impacted roads; b. Agreement that Kern County will conduct and fund a comprehensive traffic impact study within twelve months; and C. Prepayment of$750,000 to Kern County to be refunded via tonnage credits over an approximate 5-10 year period. 2. Authorize General Counsel to approve MOU as to form. SUMMARY In July of this year, the Kern County Board of Supervisors directed its staff to draft three ordinances for the Board's consideration. The three were: an ordinance that would ban biosolids; an ordinance that would regulate the use of biosolids; and a fee ordinance that would recover the costs of repairing the damage to Kern County roads caused by trucking biosolids. These issues were subsequently and extensively discussed by the Kern County Board of Supervisors on several occasions in open and closed sessions. Orange County Sanitation District staff, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts staff, Los Angeles City staff and our consultants have worked together in a very intensive effort to develop the most favorable terms achievable on these issues. Our primary objective has been to preserve the long-term use of biosolids in Kern County for agricultural purposes while maintaining, to the extent possible, a cooperative relationship between the urban and agricultural counties of California. We have negotiated with Kern County staff on a number of occasions since July and we have communicated with the Kern County Board of Supervisors in their offices and in their open sessions. We have successfully avoided the imposition of a ban, negotiated an appropriate and achievable interim use ordinance that will effectively protect public health and the environment, and have achieved conceptual agreement on the terms of an MOU with Kern County. The proposed MOU would recover road impact costs caused by biosolids trucking from the public wastewater treatment agencies that ► generate biosolids outside of Kern County. The proposed MOU would impose a $2.12 per ton fee for all out-of-county biosolids that are transported on Kern County-owned roads for the purpose of agricultural use. This rate would be adjusted to a more accurate pro rate cost sharing after a year-long study of biosolids vs. non-biosolids truck traffic for the roads in question. The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts and the Orange County Sanitation District would each prepay $750,000 in road impact mitigation fees at the time that a long-term use ordinance is adopted by the Kern County Board of Supervisors. This prepayment would be credited back to us over several years as 50% of the ongoing fees contemplated in the MOU. (For us, the pay back would take approximately 5 years at a fee of$2 per ton and 10 years at a fee of$1 per ton.) In the event that Kern County defaulted on the terms of the MOU for reasons either within or outside of its control, then any remaining prepayment would be refunded to us. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The Sanitation District presently delivers between 150,000 and 180,000 tons of biosolids per year to Kern County. Most (but not all) travel on roads that are owned by Kern County. Our contractors are in the process of developing traffic routing plans to limit travel on Kern County roads, where practical. Assuming 180,000 tons per year, a first year fee of$2.12 per ton, and everything transported on a Kern County road, the maximum first twelve months fee would be $382,000. However, staff estimates that traffic routing changes will reduce the impact fees on Kern County roads to approximately 75% of this figure and the fee will apply to only 6 months of this fiscal year. Therefore, the anticipated fee for this fiscal year is estimated to be $172,000. It could be less. In addition, we would prepay $750,000 which would be credited back over time, beginning in the second year and extending for between five and ten years against 50% of the road impacts fee prevailing at the time. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The operating budget line item for biosolids disposal is $4.2 million for FY 98-99. We presently anticipate spending this budgeted amount. The anticipated first year fee and the prepay, (together totaling $0.92 million) when added to the expenditures to this line item would represent a 22% overage. While the prepay of$750,000 can be rightfully allocated to future operating years, accurately determining a sensible allocation formula is not possible. We anticipate that the existing Joint Works Operating Budget, totaling fl M UMYperMalSIEEfl W G CpAM iTIEEW YK T10iPBB Rxn Ca BdOb<M]ll M G„c flwdJ:NUH! Page 2 just over $45 million, may have sufficient room to accommodate this unanticipated cost. Therefore, staff does not recommend an amendment to the Joint Works Operating Fund at this time. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The use of biosolids in California for agricultural purposes has increased dramatically in the last decade. Prior to 1985, domestic reuse of bagged composted biosolids products, ocean disposal and landfill disposal were the three predominate methods of biosolids management utilized by the wastewater treatment plants of southern California. Very little went directly to agricultural land. All of this changed as the Orange County Sanitation District committed to 100% beneficial reuse in our 1989 Master Plan, Los Angeles City discontinued ocean disposal, and the Los Angeles County Sanitation District began to look for alternatives to landfill disposal. The much smaller wastewater agencies of Southern California followed suit. Equally as important, the EPA adopted an extensive set of federal regulations that established scientifically-based standards for the beneficial use of biosolids in agriculture. By 1995, nearly all of Southern California's biosolids were being utilized in agricultural counties, primarily Kern, Kings, and Riverside. Agriculture has been the true beneficiary of this change in practice. Free or nearly free soil amendments have increased yields per acre and even reclaimed marginally productive land. Agriculture has profited from the practice. On the other hand, public awareness increased exponentially in the agricultural counties as each new ton arrived. Opposition increased quickly and loudly through the telling and retelling of unfounded horror stories (mixed with a few true accounts of some very poor application practices). Public concern rose to politically unacceptable levels in some California counties. To date, bans have been enacted in 10 of California's 58 counties—all of them predominately agricultural. Unfortunately, unified action by the wastewater community to educate the public and local government policy makers has been slow in coming. And we probably have yet to see the worst of the public reaction. It is for this reason that we value every beneficial use alternative we now have available to us. In Kern County, things were looking very good up until July of this year. There had been a limited problem with wind blown biosolids and inadequate irrigation in the windy and dry region of eastern Kern County, but Supervisor Steve Perez and Kenn County staff had things well under control. They were drafting a county-wide ordinance. The ordinance was a combination of federal "Section 503" regulations, recently completed California Manual of Good Practice (created by the wastewater agencies in cooperation with Cal EPA and other interested parties), and the best advice from staff of the Orange County Sanitation District, Los Angeles City's Bureau of Sanitation, and the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. With significant input from a technical advisory committee made up of Kern County interests, the evolution of the ordinance into a final XM.'VEnWmLU^IF£IiIN6COMNIREEI9B'aLTt®il Ywn Ca Bmdl MGI M.!¢ Page 3 version that would be adopted by the Kern County Board of Supervisors looked like a a done deal. While the other four supervisors had taken little notice of the ongoing public participation process or the technical merits of the use of biosolids in Kern County, the wastewater community was confident that Supervisor Perei s leadership would be sufficient to shepherd the process to completion. In July, the biosolids hit the fan. What started as a Board of Supervisors open session discussion about El Nino-related road damage soon spun out of control to include biosolids trucks, biosolids use, biosolids impacts, and agricultural "dead zones" caused by the monstrously toxic effects of biosolids. No County staff with knowledge of the pending biosolids ordinance were in the room and, because the agenda item under discussion had everything to do with roads and nothing to do with biosolids, no wastewater representatives were present either. The Supervisors directed staff to bring back an ordinance to ban some or all types of biosolids and a road fee ordinance for any biosolids that they proposed for exemption from the ban. A year's worth of technical and public outreach work went up in smoke in ten short minutes. At this point, top management staff from the three large agencies entered into the discussions for the first time. This in not to imply that the technical staffs of the agencies had done an inadequate job up to this point. Far from it. In fad, the considerable progress we have achieved in the last three months is a direct result of the trust and technical ground work they established in their dealings with Kern County staff during the previous year. The last few months have been intense, filled with countless hours of help from our technical staffs and several consultants, and meetings with members of the Board of Supervisors, key Kern County staff, carrot growers, water district interests, and other interested parties. The issues represented by the use ordinance, the proposed ban, and the fee ordinance occupied the agenda of four regular meetings of the Board of Supervisors and an equal number of their closed executive sessions as well. In August, the Board adopted a biosolids use ordinance on an urgency basis that is set to expire in January. It is essentially the ordinance that had been in the process of being readied for adoption prior to the July blow up. The Board also adopted a $5 per ton fee in August, rescinded it in September, considered a $5.99 per ton fee in October and directed Kern County staff to return with an analysis of a wastewater agency-proposed fee structure in November. Since July, the staffs of the three large wastewater agencies have agree, with varying degrees of enthusiasm, that the communities causing cost impacts to the infrastructure and administrative procedures of Kern County have some responsibility to pay for those impacts. With approximately 40,000 truck loads of biosolids applied to Kern County agricultural land every year, the county roads serving these agricultural parcels are being impacted to some degree. Also, it is evident, and quite understandable, that some agricultural interests, like carrot growers, want to make the business decision of steering clear of biosolids for the sake wey.au�+wb+�wuxccoMui*,Fesarxmmaa w.cea�e Mou w.eec wae,:eimee Page 4 of public perception and marketability. That's fine with us. The demands of non-food crops like sudan grass and cotton, for instance, are more than enough to provide a viable and ample market for the reuse of biosolids. In fact, it has been estimated that biosolids from urban Southern California would only satisfy 5% of the agricultural nutrient demand for Kern County. Providing the carrot growers with the opportunity to avoid biosolids amended land, and demonstrating to their buyers that they have, requires a robust reporting, inspection, enforcement, and record-keeping system that is administered by a county department. Fees associated with the urgency ordinance appropriately provide the money to administer such a system. With regard to impact fees associated with road damage, it is critical for the Orange County Sanitation District's Board of Directors to note that there are some significant constitutional and philosophical questions at play here. General Counsel has advised that there is significant case law to support our resisting any road fee whatsoever that Kern County might attempt to impose on us. In fact, the Kern County Taxpayers Association and the California Trucking Association have both made it a matter of record that they oppose the collection of any road fee. They asked the Kern County Board of Supervisors to look to existing fuel tax and property tax revenues for recovering costs due to the normal wear and tear on county roads caused by biosolids trucking. They both also argued that a fee directed only at biosolids is, on its face, discriminatory, and because it fails to have a solid technical basis on which to calculate it, fails the Proposition 218 test. The wastewater agencies were considering making these arguments against a road mitigation fee a matter of public record, but chose not to because we knew that our arguments could be made just as well by others. The question for the Orange County Sanitation District's Board of Directors to decide is whether to support the idea that it is fair and reasonable for the rate payers of our service area to pay for the costs of roadway repair and administrative burdens that would otherwise be paid from the general funds and road funds of Kern County. Sanitation District staff believes that it is fair and reasonable to do so. There is precedence enough here in Orange County to support this position. The host fees paid to Brea and Irvine by Orange County to offset the traffic impacts of the County's landfills is a case in point. The mitigation and impact fees charged developers for city impacts are another example of the concept. It was from this position that staff proposed the terms of the MOU that have been described above. The best (and unfortunately inadequate) estimate of biosolids-related cost impacts are contained in the hastily prepared report that was created by the engineering firm, Martin Macintosh, headquartered in Bakersfield. The firm was hired by the wastewater agencies to complete an independent survey of the truck traffic and pavement conditions of the county roadways and to recommend a tonnage charge to equitably recover the costs. The report is filled with assumptions unsubstantiated by actual field data and uses cost recovery formulas based on unmeasured traffic counts. Based on the foregoing, it concludes that biosolids carry a 73% pro rata share of the H:W ,ft\gmYclSf MWC MRiEEWbLT1WW Wm Ce 6bm'KK MW AR n.:.ae.emlee Page 5 responsibility of the road damage, and that cost recovery over a ten-year period would k require a $2.12 per ton fee on the biosolids traveling these roads. Actual truck traffic counts and actual engineering field assessments of the roads in question are necessary to establish a more accurate pro rate assessment of biosolids trucking. This can be done, but will require either a year's planting and harvesting cycle to count trucks, or a far more sophisticated accounting of the trucking activities that typically occur on the roads in question. Both methods will take longer than the Kern County Board of Supervisors is willing to wait. In the interim, if one buys the argument that a fair and reasonable payment to Kern County is appropriate, then every month that a fee decision is delayed is one more month that debts remain unpaid to Kern County. It is for this reason that the wastewater agencies proposed a first year interim fee of $2.12 per ton. We believe that an accurate assessment will result in a fee more on the order of $1 per ton, but we won't really know until a more comprehensive assessment is completed. $2.12 is a reasonable negotiated first year fee, considering where the Board of Supervisors started. The idea of a prepayment was first suggested by the wastewater agencies. The reason for this suggestion was to acknowledge that there are existing and unmet road repair needs that are impacting our operations, as well as all others who share the use of the roads in question. Kern County staff have adequately described the shortfall of their road repair budget in this and previous fiscal years. We thought it reasonable to advance some of our fees with the understanding that these fees would be fully recoverable in either the form of credits in future years or in a cash refund if circumstances prevent us from future access to Kern County. In no case would the prepayment be offered or paid without the wastewater agencies first receiving reasonable assurance through the adoption of a final version of a use ordinance (and not a biosolids ban) by the Kern County Board of Supervisors. The act of the Board to adopt a tough but reasonable use ordinance that fully protects public health and the environment is sound public policy we support. It regulates the transport, use, monitoring, reporting and record keeping of biosolids use activities on agricultural land. ALTERNATIVES There are three alternatives: 1. That the Board of Directors authorize approval of a Memorandum of Understanding between Kern County and Orange County Sanitation District for purposes of sharing in the cost of repairing and mitigating the impact to certain Kern County roads from biosolids truck delivery traffic, in a form approved by General Counsel. This is the staff recommended alternative. 2. That the Board of Directors directs General Counsel to notify Kern County of our intent to not pay road impact costs imposed by ordinance or other proposed X My UleMpmOaV^IEERMG LCAIMR}EENPpC1�10$BBB Kem Cu Bmtlq{MW M.GM K..,ee aao� Page 6 Y methodology and that we would take action up to and including relief in the Courts to enforce our rights. We could very well prevail in this endeavor. However, Kern County could devise other methods to collect the fees which are legal or could seek legislative relief in Sacramento or Washington. In any case, a long and protracted battle between urban and agricultural interests would serve little constructive purpose and would do nothing to advance a spirit of cooperation and mutual support. 3. That the Board of Directors directs staff to eliminate Kern County as an alternative for managing biosolids. Other counties and other non-land based alternatives are certainly within the realm of possibility. We, in fact, now take 15% of our biosolids to Kings, San Diego, or Riverside Counties. However, these alternatives, if not now more expensive than Kern County, could in the future become so. We would expect that if the wastewater agencies walk away from Kern County (where the vast majority of southern California biosolids are now used), there will be an immediate dislocation of the existing pricing structure of biosolids management, and we will see price increases in the alternative counties. Recent proposal cost for our sister agencies have ranged from $28.00 to $32.00 per wet ton. It is also unclear at this time how sustainable agricultural use of biosolids will be if Kern County falls. As goes Kern County, so goes California, and some say the Nation. If Board of Directors directs staff to implement Alternative 3, the District has the following non-Kern County biosolids management options currently available under existing contracts Bio Gro, Pima Gro, and Tule Ranch. Sites currently available at existing contract rates Bio Gro and Pima Gro have a permitted land base of approximately 9,000 acres in western Riverside County and 4,000 acres in San Diego County. The District and several Southern Californian POTWs, including San Diego, are currently using these sites. A conservative estimate of the District's share of the capacity on these sites is approximately 80,000 tons of biosolids per year. Unfortunately, these sites are not a viable option during inclement weather. This capacity may increase pending San Diego's decision to start landfilling biosolids in January 1999. Adverse regulatory activity may result from a drastic increase in biosolids imported to Riverside County. Tule Ranch has a land base of 1,808 acres in Kings County. A conservative estimate of the District's share of the capacity on this site is approximately 30,000 tons of biosolids per year. This site provides the District with a viable inclement weather biosolids management site. However, some of Tule Ranch's Kern County sites directly adjacent to the Kings County line may not be subjected to the road mitigation impact fee since they can be accessed without using "county roads." Such a determination may result in an additional 2,680 acres available for management of District's biosolids. A conservative estimate HMy.aase•"m�wc cauMmee�erwcm mme wm ce ema�a wu•n.e: neseaeause Page 7 of the District's share of the capacity on this site is approximately 45,000 tons of f biosolids per year. If the District were to enter into an agreement having sole rights to Tule Ranch's Kings County site and the adjacent Kern County site the capacity would be approximately 150,000 tons per year. Sites currently available at increased rates Bio Gro and Pima Gro have a permitted land base of approximately 1,000 acres in eastern Riverside County. Capacity on this site is approximately 25,000 tons of biosolids per year. This site provides the District with a viable inclement weather biosolids management site. Biosolids management at this site would cost approximately $30.00 per ton. Additional biosolids management options currently available include Bio Gro's ability to compost District's biosolids at their Arizona Soils composting site for $38.00 per ton, Pima Gro's Arizona land application at$35.00 per ton, and Landfilling in Arizona at $45.00 per ton. Pima Gro also expects to receive a 250-ton per day expansion at their Recyc composting facility in February 1999. This could provide the District with a 90,000 ton per year biosolids management option. Expected cost for this composting option is approximately $26.00 per ton. Assessment of other biosolids management alternatives such as other contracting with other land application sites, and buying a farm and/or a composting facility are being explored. CEQA FINDINGS To the extent that Kern County finds it necessary to comply with CEQA in its ordinance adoption process they will do so. They will rely, somewhat, on the regulations of the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, Lahontan and Central Valley Regions. ATTACHMENTS None BPA:LB Kt .M...g.nE0S1EERING C MRIE�MM I(em Co 8vd MW AR.Ex R,,;.. . Page 8 h a C�e� DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1998 - 5.30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on October 14, 1998, in the District's Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Betty Burnett, General Counsel James Ferryman, Vice Chair Shane McGannon, Tulle Ranch Bumie Dunlap, Board Chair Toby Weissert, Corollo Engineers Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Steve Anderson Staff Present: Don Bankhead John Collins Don McIntyre, General Manager Anna Piercy Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Margie L. Rice Ed Hodges, Director General Services Admin. Bob Ooten, Director Operations and Maintenance Directors Absent: Patrick Miles, Director Information Technology Frankie Woodside, Committee Secretary Charles E. Sylvia Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager Ed Torres,Air Quality & Special Projects Manager Larry Kraemer, Senior Engineer Mike Moore, ECM Manager APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. OCSD 0 P 0.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley.C 92/36E127 0 (714)9e2-2411 Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 October 14, 1998 APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the September 2, 1998 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR (McGuigan) Thanked Ed Torres for the tour of the Microfillralion unit and introduced Anne Piercy as a new board member. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER (McIntyre) No report was given. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (Anderson) No report was given. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (Hodges) The CNG station will be up and running Friday, October 16, 1998, and the dedication ceremony will be held October 30, 1998. The Cooperative Projects Guidance Committee has been established, they met last month and will meet again this next week. The Committee has begun to formulate the rating criteria that will be used to evaluate the proposals, once they are received. We are in discussion with the City of Fountain Valley to assist them in a fueling agreement for diesel and unleaded fuel. I will address this proposed agreement next month. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY(Miles) We are in the process of developing an Internet presence for the District and it should be available by the end of this month or early November. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (Ooten) We received the final payment from Southern California Energy Coalition escrow account in the amount of$134,000. The Southern California Edison Company had held the money. A report regarding the reinvention plan was prepared but was not included in the package, it will be brought forward when OMTS next meets. The report is several pages. Hence the Directors need time to digest prior to the meeting. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 October 14, 1998 On page three of the O&M Report, the O&M Safety Summary data in the table is correct and the calculation for the Total Injury Frequency rate was incorrect. Director Swan requested the gallonage charge be added to the budget reports. He also requested the chart on page 4, Item 3- Final Effluent BOD and SS be replaced with a graph of the effluent suspended solids mass discharge. O&M Monthly Report Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report: A report for the month of August was submitted to the OMITS Committee for review. This report focuses on compliance, safety, financial data and performance measures for O & M and is intended to provide Committee members with information on a timely basis. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES (Ghirelli) No report was given. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. DISCUSSION ITEMS) 1. OMTS98-030 YEAR 2000 DATE CHANGE COMPLIANCE PROJECT Motion: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to: 1. Increase the Year 2000 Date Change Budget Authorization from $500,000 to $2,141,500 for staff labor, material, and outside service costs through June 30, 1999. 2. Approve Phase 2 of the Professional Services Agreement for Year 2000 Compliance project management and documentation services with Bristol Systems Inc. for$160,000 for the period from November 1998 to June 1999. The recommended total not to exceed cost for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 is $232,000 This item will be kept on the agenda every month for further updates. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 October 14, 1998 2. OMTS98-031 WATER CONSERVATION COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM Motion: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to: 1. Enter into an agreement with Municipal Water District of Orange County(MWDOC)for a multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program and direct staff to participate in Programs 1 & 2 for an amount not to exceed $150,000. 2. Authorize staff to enter into a pilot project with MWDOC for Program 3 in an amount not to exceed $33,000. 3. OMTS98-032 KERN COUNTY BIOSOLIDS ORDINANCE AND ROAD MITIGATION FEE AGREEMENT Motion: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to continue negotiating the road mitigation costs associated with the Kern County Biosolids Urgency Ordinance. The Directors would like this brought back to the Committee when they next meet along with a cost- analysis report. 4. OMTS98-033 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT Motion: Information only. The Directors would like future quarterly reports modified to include a cost per ton for each company identified in the Contractor Load Distribution chart on page 4. 5. OMTS98-034 O&M COST SAVINGS PROVIDED BY THE DISTRICT'S 301(h) WATER QUALITY PERMIT Motion: Information only. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 October 14, 1998 OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for November 4, 1998 at the District's Administrative Offices. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Submitted by1:/ ��1c�11C1U Frankie Woodside Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary H:\wp.dWagsal410\woodsideWMBN998WOdob Al\ 1498 Minutes.doc OMTS COMMITTEE Memnewr• o/iris TOro/ze/se BD.of dr. r r AGENDA REPORT rt•mNumO r%Sy Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Originator: Robert Thompson, Plant Automation Manager SUBJECT: YEAR 2000 DATE CHANGE COMPLIANCE PROJECT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Increase the Year 2000 Date Change Budget Authorization from $500,000 to $2,141,500 for staff labor, material, and outside services costs through June 30, 1999. 2. Approve Phase 2 of the Professional Services Agreement for Year 2000 Compliance project management and documentation services with Bristol Systems Inc. for $160,000 for the period from November 1998 to June 1999. SUMMARY The Year 2000 (Y2K) Date Change Project is required to ensure that the District's internal process controls, embedded systems, and computing systems operate safely, predictably, and satisfactorily for all dates in the Year 2000 and beyond. Industry standard methodology will be used to successfully achieve the following objectives in priority order: 1. PUMP WATER INTO AND OUT OF THE PLANTS • Ensure personnel safety systems are functional and meet OSHA requirements. • Keep wastewater flowing into the treatment plants and through the 120" outfall. 2. TREAT WASTEWATER TO PERMIT LEVELS • Achieve full compliance with discharge quality requirements 3. ENSURE FULL PERMIT COMPLIANCE • Maintain full compliance with all other terms and conditions Of permits issued by RWQCB, EPA, and SCAQMD. 4. MAINTAIN DISTRICT BUSINESS PROCESSES • Ensure compliance for non-process related systems including the Financial Information System (FIS), desktop computing systems, security systems, etc... In support of Objective#1, District staff are preparing a risk analysis plan for plant process systems classified by criticality. Critical systems include influent pumping, outfall pumping, electrical generation, instrument air, and water systems. Additionally, staff intend to research, correct (if required), and test all embedded systems (e.g. "smart" transmitters or valves, variable speed electric motor drives, electronic time clocks, sampling equipment, and data and voice networking equipment)which may n.w.a. rows Page 1 affect Objectives#1 and #2. To assist in this process, staff has acquired the services of , Dr. Gayn Winters, President and technical representative of Bristol Systems, Inc. ' Dr. Winters chairs the IEEE Working Group for Year 2000 Problems in Embedded Devices and co-chairs the Southern California Software Council's Special Interest Group on the Year 2000. Dr. Winters has 33 years of experience in the computer industry specializing in embedded systems. His expertise in this crucial area will greatly enhance staffs ability to successfully achieve Objectives#1 and #2. Objective#3 involves the effort to ensure that normal permit required laboratory and field testing continues and that operating requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Air Quality Management District not directly related to ocean discharge quality requirements are also met. Staff intends to research, correct (if required), and test embedded systems required to carry out this objective. Objective #4 involves the effort to ensure that District business processes continue with minimal disruption. Examples include the Financial Information System (FIS), desktop computing, building mechanical systems (e.g. security and alarm systems) and other noncritical specialty software packages. Given that different staff resources are required for each objective, staff can and will address the objectives in parallel. Objectives #1 and #2 will be prioritized in cases where common resources are required. The purpose of this report is to recommend an increase in the Y2K Project budget from $500,000 to $2,141,500 for FY 1998/1999 only (please reference the attached project cost/staff FTE summary for further details). Funding for FY 1999/2000 will be requested via the normal budgeting process. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached spreadsheets. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information Rem) Staff estimate that the overall impact to District expenditures will be neutral. While there is significant staff associated with this project, it will be reallocated from other capital and operational activities which will be temporarily deferred or modified to provide sufficient staff capacity to do the Y2K work. The CORF budget will incur additional staff charges representing nearly 80% of the Y2K project cost. Conversely, the Joint Operating expense account should realize a net decrease of the same amount. Outside services and material charges (the remaining 20% of project costs) to CORF should be offset by probable spending delays in FY 1998/1999 capital projects. w.,..a ,o.,,,, Page 2 y ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Overall Project Approach: To ensure the successful completion of the four project objectives outlined in the summary, a five-step process will be applied uniformly across the District. The steps are: • Awareness and Evaluation • Assessment of Hardware and Software and Associated Risk of Failure • Correction of Problems or Work Around Plans Developed for Problems Discovered in Assessment • Testing of the Corrective Action or Work Around Plan • Deployment of the Tested Software/Hardware on Live Systems Embedded systems are considered the most important area to evaluate for each of the four project objectives. Embedded systems are defined as equipment or systems with built in microprocessors. Examples of embedded systems at the District include: "smart" transmitters or valves, variable speed electric motor drives, electronic time clocks, robotic lab equipment, and data and voice networking equipment. District staff are preparing a detailed embedded systems inventory. EQE International, an insurance industry risk analysis firm, was retained in July to work with Operations & Maintenance and Information Technology to identify both internal and external risk factors. The embedded systems inventory will be sorted by Objective and prioritized based on risk factors. A Request for Proposal will be sent to firms with expertise in evaluating embedded systems. The selected vendor will provide a report detailing which embedded systems are Y21K compliant, non-compliant and special. Recommendations for non-compliant or special systems will be detailed; upgrade to firmware version X.X, replace with part#XXXX, or a workaround procedure will be provided (e.g. set date back to 1992). Further, the selected vendor will provide written test procedures for staff to verify embedded system compliance. District staff are well into the process of evaluating its Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC's) and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System. These systems appear to be Y21K compliant and will be tested thoroughly. Likewise, other District business processes, while not the priority, will be assessed to ensure Y21K compliance. • The Laboratory is highly automated with robotic testing, computerized sample control, and sample custody issues. It is important for permit compliance that these systems continue to operate normally. • The financial system is heavily dependent on electronic control systems for payroll, fiscal reporting and payment of bills. • The Purchasing /Warehousing functions are increasingly computerized and are critical for the ongoing operation and maintenance to the treatment process. • The Communications department has special graphics development equipment. • The Human Resources department maintains several programs for safety, training record keeping, and employee benefits. � ,ate Page 3 • The Technical Services department maintains specialized programming to aid in Source Control and Environmental Monitoring. • The Engineering department maintains electronic records for projects in various stages of completion as well as operating process systems. It is important that this information be safe guarded. Air quality compliance systems will be assessed to ensure permit reporting compliance is maintained. Another aspect of the Y21K Compliance Project is to identify, and prepare for, the effects of external Y2K driven events in order to minimize the risk to public health and District operation. This aspect of the Project is focused primarily on the operation of the treatment process. The methodology for this part of the project includes: • Identification of Risk Factors • Creation of Plans and Procedures to Mitigate Identified Risks • Updates to the Integrated Emergency Response Plan (IERP) • Table Top Exercise • Late December 1999 Preparation The most visible external events include the temporary loss of critical utility service, electricity, natural gas, city water, industrial water, and process chemicals. The risk assessment planning also takes into account these outside variables. With the proper contingency planning and preparation in place these risks can be managed to acceptable levels. With this information in hand, Operations and Maintenance will proceed with the risk abatement planning. The same individuals who successfully planned for the El Nino events will be involved in the Y2K preparation and planning. As this planning is completed, the Integrated Emergency Response Plan will be updated. This planning will be of benefit for years to come. The written procedures will assist staff in the event of a county/city wide power failure, telephone outage, or interruptions in water delivery. It is anticipated that preparatory exercises will be conducted in the fall of 1999. Planning will also be put Into place to ready the District prior to dates that have been identified as having a higher probability of trouble. Simple steps such as topping off plant chemical and diesel tanks, scheduling extra staff, and managing vacation scheduling will be very low cost and very beneficial in responding to difficulties. Project progress to data: • District-wide Y2K awareness has been achieved for key supervisory and technical staff. • The Y21K steering committee was formed to coordinate interdepartmental activities. • A standardized methodology of assessment/evaluation, remediation, testing, and commissioning of systems has been adopted District-wide. • Information Technology has created a detailed project implementation plan and schedule. All other District departments are creating their schedules based on the same execution plan and project schedule templates. • A processtpermit compliance Risk Assessment by a third party with heavy District staff input is nearly complete. w.„.., %dam Page 4 • The Districts process control computers and software have been assessed with no v major problems found. Identified software patches and no cost upgrades are being done, followed by testing. • The Operations and Maintenance Department, Information Technology and Laboratory are assembling their inventory of embedded systems to be assessed by an independent third party. • Y21K archive has been established. • District-wide task tracking is in place. • The District-wide working plan is in place. • The internal telephone equipment has been upgraded to Y2K compliance. • Central Generation Engine Control Software and Computer Hardware are being upgraded by the manufacture for Y21K compliance. • Source Control Permitting Program is 75% converted from a non-compliant DOS format to a compliant Windows NT platform. Future project milestones include: • Objective#1 Critical wastewater pumping systems will be Y2K compliant by March 31, 1999. • Objective#2 Wastewater treatment systems will be Y2K compliant by September 30, 1999. • Objective#3 Non-treatment permit compliance systems will be Y2K compliant by June 30, 1999. • Objective#4 Normal District business process systems will be addressed by December 31,1999. Requirement for additional resources: Bristol Systems, Inc. has been assisting the District in focusing the Y2K project since June 1998. Bristol Systems assisted staff in adopting a standardized methodology, producing a written project plan, maintaining a uniform documentation system, and developing detailed project schedules for tracking. Bristol Systems has also been instrumental in assisting staff to understand the need for, and subsequently help develop an embedded systems inventory. Phase 1 of the consulting contract is nearing completion and has included: Phase 1 (June 1998— October 1998) • Increase District-wide awareness of the Y21K problem. • Implement a standardized Y2K project methodology and written project plan. • Assist District staff in the creation of detailed and unified project schedule. • Create and maintain a project archive to satisfy due diligence concerns. • Work with District staff to produce an embedded system assessment scope of work and detailed embedded systems inventory. • Coordinate the risk assessment study activities with EQE International and District staff. • Create and maintain the Y2K project task tracking system. �.,a_ 1. Page 5 • Manage the external requests for Y21K related information by producing an approved standard response letter. • Assist District staff in identifying critical vendors, mailing request for information letters to each vendor, and track and document the responses. Phase 2 (November 1998 —June 1999) of the consulting contract requires Board authorization and includes the following services: • Assist District staff in developing a treatment process risk analysis study. • Assist District staff in selecting and managing an embedded system assessment consultant for critical systems. • Assist District staff in producing compliance testing procedures and testing for computer systems and embedded systems. • Update the written project plan monthly. • Progress and update the unified project schedule. • Maintain a project archive to satisfy due diligence concerns. • Maintain the Y21K project task tracking system. • Manage the external requests for Y21K related information by producing an updated approved standard response letter quarterly. • Assist District staffs in tracking critical vendor requests for information and document all correspondence. • Assist District staff in contingency planning activities. Recommendation for Bristol Systems Consulting Services: Bristol Systems Inc. is the product of a merger between SMS Agoura Systems Incorporated and System Solutions International. These companies have been doing business in Orange County for 24 years collectively. Bristol Systems Inc. maintains offices in Orange and Santa Ana. Their gross revenue last year was appoximately$2 million. Current major accounts include IBM, Dyncorp Inc., and Experian Corporation. Dr. Gayn Winters is the assigned technical representative from Bristol Systems. Dr. Winters chairs the IEEE Working Group for Year 2000 Problems in Embedded Devices and co-chairs the Southern California Software Council's Special Interest Group on The Year 2000. These groups specialize in understanding the classification, analysis, debugging, testing, and legal issues related to Year 2000 problems. Dr. Winters has 33 years of experience in the computer industry in computer design, software development and embedded systems. The assigned project manager from Bristol Systems has six years of experience in industrial project management. Prior to selecting Bristol Systems, the Information Technology Department contacted several firms including Lockheed Martin IMS, Focus Software International, Inc, Digital Equipment Corp., Litton Enterprise Solutions, and Bristol Systems Inc. Lockheed Martin IMS and Focus Software International declined to offer project management services due to lack of resources. Digital Equipment Corp. offered services centered on its own equipment, which is of limited help. Litton Enterprise Solutions offered a $40,000/month project management proposal. This proposal was judged too expensive for the services rendered. Bristol Systems offered a very competitively priced, approximately $20,000/month, flexible proposal for comprehensive technical and management Rm; ,Wove Page 6 services. The proposal, detailed in Phase 1 and Phase 2 above, is structured as a not to exceed (NTE) contract and may be terminated with four weeks notice. ALTERNATIVES 1. Recognizing that some level of effort must be expended on the Y2K project, the Board could direct staff to limit the time spent on an individual project objective or limit the time spent on all of the project objectives. 2. Direct staff to solicit additional proposals for the statement of work currently performed by Bristol Systems, Inc., or direct staff to reduce the overall scope for Bristol Systems. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Year 2000 Date Change Project— Cost Summary (through 6130199) Year 2000 Date Change Project— Staff FTE Summary (through 6130199) Ae�.. IN. Page 7 Year 2000 Date Change Project Cost Summary (through 6130199) OUTSIDE OBJECTIVE DESCRIPTION STAFF SERVICES MATIL TOTALS 1 PUMP WATER INTO AND OUT OF THE PLANTS $ 351,000 $ 80,000 $ - $ 431,000 Keep wastewater flowing into the treatment plants and throuah the 120"ouffall A. Safety Compliance B. Collection system operation C. Wastewater pumping into the treatment plants D. Pumping effluent into the outfall 2 TREAT WASTEWATER TO PERMIT LEVELS 468,000 195,000 20,000 683,000 Achieve full compliance with discharge quality requirements 3 ENSURE FULL PERMIT COMPLIANCE 234,000 54,000 288,000 Maintain full compliance with all other terms and conditions of permits issued by RWQCB, EPA, and SCAQMD 4 MAINTAIN DISTRICT BUSINESS PROCESSES 643,500 66,000 30,000 739,500 A. Financial Information System Testing B. Desktop Computing/Standard Software C. Mechanical Systems D. Security/Telephone E. Specialty Software TOTAL PROJECT COSTS S rr rrr 50,000 it ' Please note that all numbers are estimates based on the best available information. Specifically, the material cost estimate could change significantly if major hardware issues are uncovered. OMITS Agenda Report Attachments October 98 10/20/98 Year 2000 Date Change Project Staff FTE Summary (through 6130199) TOTAL TOTAL OBJECTIVE O&M ENO GSA TS FIN Other IT FTE COSTS 1 1.0 1.5 0.5 3.0 $ 351,000 2 3.0 1.0 4.0 468,000 3 2.0 2.0 234,000 4 0.5 2.0 1.0 2.0 5.5 643,500 OMTS Meeting Date T03L Bid. 10/14/98 10/28/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Nu r 98-031 /'s- Orange County Sanitation District / FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration SUBJECT: WATER CONSERVATION COOPERATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC)for a multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program and direct staff to participate in Programs 1 &2 for an amount not to exceed $150,000. 2. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a pilot project with MWDOC for Program 3 in an amount not to exceed $33,000. Recommended Action Staff believes that it would be beneficial to continue with another multi-agency agreement with MWDOC. OCSD benefits associated with their participation in a ULF toilet Rebate Program and Bulk Purchase and Free Distribution Program are estimated at 412,000-gallons/day/yr wastewater flow reduction (Attachment A). This benefit is based on targeting 15,000 ULF toilet retrofits with savings rates of 24 gallons per day in the single-family sector and 43 gallons per day in the multi-family sector assuming a 67/33 split between single and multi-family retrofits. The total savings are anticipated to be $51,416 per year. This represents a 2.92-year return on investment. Additionally, staff would like to develop a multi-agency agreement that would address a Commercial, Industrial and Institutional rebate program. Background Historically, the District has been committed to the objectives of water reuse and water conservation. Water reuse (reclamation) efforts have been focused on a cooperative association with the Orange County Water District (OCWD). Additionally, water agencies within the District's service area have actively developed and operated water conservation programs in response to the need to prudently manage California's limited water resources. The District first dealt with these issues in their 1989 Master Plan (volume 3) and is dedicating another entire volume of the soon to be released, Strategic Plan. In November 1996, the California Urban Water Agencies (CUWA) and the Environmental Water Caucus (EWC) established principles supporting the joint development and advancement of an urban water conservation framework as part of the CALFED Water Use Efficiency Common Program. The Water Use Efficiency common Program proposed several strategies to promote more efficient allocation and use of water from the Bay-Delta watershed. Urban water conservation is one of these strategies. Efforts to improve urban water use efficiency in California have been underway for some time. H%Wftbsealay.e %Ce eivew eas P„yy,nwmerCa ee�ikt roans.Repoli ans-Mier conxnern,.aa< Page r The 1991 signing of the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water Conservation in California greatly advanced urban water management by providing water agencies a consensus-based framework in which to implement water conservation Best Management Practices (BMP). There are 14 identified and accepted BMP's available today. BMP 2 deals with Residential Plumbing Retrofit; BMP 6 deals with High-Efficiency Washing Machine Rebate Programs; BMP 9 deals with Conservation Programs for Commercial, Industrial, and Institution Accounts; and BMP 14 deals with the Residential ULFT Replacement Programs. This report addresses an approach that staff believes best addresses these four BMP's. Prior Action At the March 1998 OMTS, staff asked for and received permission to enter into an agreement with MWDOC for a multi-agency water use efficiency program. This provided for the distribution of ultra low flow (ULF) toilets, showerheads and sink aerators. This program included the distribution of 11,875 ULF toilets at a total cost to the District of$78,400 ($6.60 per ULF toilet). In August, this agreement was amended to increase the total distribution of ULF toilets from 11,875 to 14,875 and the total cost to the District from $78,400 to $98,200. This expanded program ended on September 30, 1998. To date, the program has been very successful. Between May 1, 1998 and September 14, 1998, a total of 12,570 ULF toilets were distributed to multi-family residences. This represents 85% of the total 14,875 ULF toilet target. As of the time this agenda report was prepared, another 774 ULF toilets have been reserved and await distribution. The total cost to the District of this program (assuming that the remaining 774 ULF toilets get distributed) is $88,098. A breakdown by city of the 12,570 ULF toilets that have been distributed this year, is listed below, Grand Total Brea Agency 6I119 9-911419 9 u Fountain a Garden y a enn Grove Huntington Beach a Habra Orange Seal eac us tin Mr es ms r y East range Vivo lu mesa consolklatea- Yonne Linda Anaheim u on Neavon Beach Santa Ana TOTAL 12,570 Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will present a verbal report on this item. ew.a.�w.��o+vaa.�cm.w^^ +.wwmlw.wcw.�+vrae b.d.wcm oslrs.w.wrw..lmae Paget a PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Staff has budgeted $200,000.00 in the fiscal year 1998/99 CIP budget for this program. As of October 1, 1998, there are $183,292 remaining. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, page 230) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item) Since Staff budgeted $200,000 under the Water Management portion in this year's fiscal CIP budget (Section 8, page 230, item b), the expenditure of these funds should have a minimal effect on the budget. To date, staff, has spent$7,010 for a ULF toilet program conducted on District property in August and $9,699 for 1,469 ULF toilets distributed under last years program. Of the remaining $183,000, staff intends on spending $150,000 on Programs 1 & 2 and the remaining $33,000 on Program 3, as listed above. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This year, there are three established MWDOC countywide programs that staff believes the District should participate in. The programs are: Program#1: Single and Multi-Family ULF Toilet Rebate Program This program offers a $50 rebate toward the purchase of a toilet of the customers choice. A contractor managed by MWDOC administers this project through the mail and over the phone to residents throughout Orange County. MWDOC designs and prints marketing brochures for retail agency distribution to their customers and to local home centers. The total unit cost for this project is $61 including $60 from Metropolitan and $1 from MWDOC. The proposed OCSD participation is a $10 contribution to increase the current rebate, from $50 to $60. Program #2: Bulk Purchase and Free Distribution ULF Toilet Program This program offers a standard white toilet and installation hardware to program participants at a unit cost of$70. MWDOC acquires, tracks and distributes the toilets to residents throughout Orange County. MWDOC designs and prints marketing brochures for retail agency distribution to their customers- The ultimate goal for this project is to provide free toilets to single and multi-family residents throughout Orange County. Four pilot programs are being planned this year to verify the accuracy of the costs listed above. MWDOC would coordinate bulk purchasing of the toilets and coordinate deliveries to retail water agencies for distribution to their customers. Free distribution is possible but requires limited staffing assistance by retail agencies. If successful, this will be the model program in the Nation. nwv.an�.ouimmpe•�comsmwa PM weQmmw cm,em.n Hamm Re uuvs-v mcmmmven Page As you can see from the above referenced chart, the total cost of this program is estimated to be $70 per toilet. Metropolitan will provide$60 and OCSD will provide the remaining $10. Staff is attempting to establish four pilot test sites to host this program and to verify the program methodology and cost estimates. The first program is scheduled for October 10, 1998 at the Mesa Consolidated corporate yard in Costa Mesa. As of this writing, there are no firm plans for additional pilot sites; however, negotiations are underway with the following cities: Anaheim, Huntington Beach and Garden Grove. Program#3: Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Plumbing Fixture Rebate Program This program offers rebates for a variety of common plumbing fixtures found in the Commercial, Industrial and Institutional sector. The rebate level is based on the volume of water savings associated with the efficiency device. The current rebate amount along with proposed OCSD funding levels (based on water savings and 3-year benefit) is provided in the table below. Recommended OCSD Funding Levels for Common Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Plumbing Fixture Retrofits Plumbing Fixture Current MWDOC Proposed OCSD Rebate Total Rebate Rebate _Uffm- ow Plush Toffel nna uomaro auw— o ave orizon a es as er oomg ower on u lv Controller This is a new program administered in-house by MWDOC staff on a pilot basis. If demand for the program is great, a contractor will be hired for project implementation. At this early stage of program implementation, participation levels are low but increasing. Rebate funding is provided by Metropolitan while MWDOC provides in-kind services (staff to administer program) for program implementation. The District proposed funding participation would be at the levels listed in the above-referenced chart. OCSD Economic Benefits The reduction of wastewater flows can, (1) reduce operating costs for the collection, treatment, and outfall systems; and (2) delay and or reduce future capital improvements. The primary source of cost savings is from delaying the need for and/or reducing the size of capital improvements. The secondary source of savings is from reduced energy consumption and other operations and maintenance savings from chemicals and labor. Volume 7 of the District's Strategic Plan deals with the issue of Water Reuse and Water Conservation. Attachment C to that document is a June 1997 survey of Programs and Potential Benefits to the District. In that report Camp Dresser McKee (CDM) noted that, "Combining the projected cost savings per gallon for capital construction and energy, the total expected benefit to the District is $112,755 per mgd per year of reduced, sustainable Flows. This converts to approximately$0.113 per gallon/day per year of reduced flow." ALTERNATIVES 1. Not to proceed with the Water Conservation Cooperative Projects Program 2. Increase the Water Conservation Cooperative Projects Program budget from $200,000 to $400,000 and authorize staff to go forward with a more aggressive program. H: P4.%PMIUOWOWCoy.,eWO".P,o®wnlWax CenumtimlW arwM.aep.M1OMIS-wam,cn..enalun.ex Page CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Analysis of OCSD Economic Benefits (Attachment A) EEH: fw x�.ra4sawioecae�cnw�+avrv;.mnmpicm�wm.rca�w�.N���oenperm xww�ornrs-wxb cm�.aemex. Page i Attachment A Analysis of OCSD Economic Benefits Programs 1 & 2 Target: 15,000 Retrofits Savings Rates: Single-family Toilet—24 gallons/day (67% or 10,000 retrofits) Mufti-family Toilet—43 gallons/day (33% or 5,000 retrofits) Analysis: Single-family— 10,000 retrofits x 24 gallons/day = 240,000 Multi-family - 5,000 retrofits x 43 gallons/day = 215,000 Total OCSD Benefit: 455,000 gpd x:woaob.oa�ou�w.� �h+wgw.rmmmnrvm«cenmrveumwnaa«mnew�OWS-Mercwwrv.imn.aoc Page DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, October 8, 1998, at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, October 8, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Collins John Linder, Construction Manager Brian Donahue Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Burnie Dunlap, Board Chair Jim Harris, Project Manager Eva Miner-Bradford Gail Cain, Executive Assistant Christina Shea Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Absent: Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers Patsy Marshall Dave Sullivan Bob Zemel (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) AGENDA The agenda was posted in accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2. OCSD • P 0 Box 8127 . Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 . (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 2 October 8, 1998 (4) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (5) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the September 3, 1998 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (6) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. (7) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. (8) REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager reported on the Kern County road fees and negotiations with Kern County. • Currently, the proposed Kern County road fees are at $2.12 a ton, with a $1.5 million front end pre-payment. • The fees pertain only to county roads in Kem County. • OCSD is coordinating the negotiations with agencies and private companies. • We want the fees to be fair and equitable. • Kenn County Board of Supervisors will meet on October 13, 1998 to discuss the issue. • The OMTS Committee has jurisdiction on this issue and will meet on Wednesday, October 14, 1998. • The item will be on the agenda of the Board Meeting October 28, 1998. (9) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering reported on numerous projects currently in construction: • 5-33-1 Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station • The new stucco wall with gate and paving has been completed. • 5-41-1 Lido Pump Station Relocation • Backfilling has been completed around new pump station. • Half of sheet piles were removed October 6, 1998 with no problems of damage or complaints. • The pile removal operation will be completed tomorrow. Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 3 October 8, 1998 • 5-41 Lido Force Main Replacement • Brackets have been installed for the screen that will hide the force main located on the side of the bridge over the canal. • The screen is expected to be installed in approximately one month. • PI-51R Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station • The new gas compressor has been installed. • The scheduled completion date is October 16, 1998. • A dedication ceremony is scheduled for October 30, 1998. • 3-38-3 Improvements to Miller-holder Trunk Sewer System • Change Order No. 5 is on the agenda for tonight's meeting. • Traffic has been disrupted due to two to three lanes on Imperial Highway in the City of La Habra being taken out of service for the construction. • Director Anderson has been concerned about the impacts on traffic, and we have been keeping him informed of the activity. • The contractor is on schedule; however, we and the City would like the contractor to complete sooner, if possible. We are seeking Caltrans approval to extend daytime-working hours in order to complete the job by the first week in December. P2-65 Warehouse at Plant No. 2 • We received 13 bids that were opened on Tuesday, October 6, 1998. • Apparent low bidder listed an exception, so that bid may be rejected. • It appears that the second low bidder is qualified to do the project. • The bid is less than engineer's estimate. • Will be forwarded as an Agenda Item to the Board Meeting in October. • P1-44-4 Seismic Retrofit of Structures • Project is to do seismic upgrades of facilities, including the Administration Building. • A part of the project is to enhance waterproofing of the Administration Building. • We received four bids that were opened on Tuesday, September 15, 1998. • Low bidder did not list the subcontractor for the waterproofing work, and did not have the required qualifications. • The next two low bidders listed a subcontractor that appears to not have the required experience for the type of coaling we specified. • This will be an Agenda Item at the Board Meeting in October with a recommendation to reject all bids and to rebid the project. Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 4 October 8, 1998 Newport Beach Spill Incident of July 21, 1998 Director Collins asked for an update on the spill incident. The Assistant General Manager reported that The Gas Company has already paid the District for some of the work that was required to repair the line. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, interviewed Construction Management and GSA staff, and based on those interviews, conclusion has been reached that we followed our current procedures for responding to Dig Alert requests. Using those procedures for screening of Dig Alert requests, we did not respond to the request to mark our line. The Dig Alert did not disclose they were going to be doing dewatering. The Police Report of the incident is now with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Regional Board will be taking any further action if warranted. (10) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (11) CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Reports and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent (5%). (12) QUARERLY REPORT ON PSAs AND ADDENDA Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Quarterly PSAs and Addenda Report. (13) QUARTERLY REPORT ON FACILITIES ENGINEERING CONSULTANT ACTIVITY Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Quartedy Facilities Engineering Consultant Activity Report. (14) ACTION ITEMS (Items No.A-D) A. PDC98-40: Ratify Change Order No. 6 to Jobs No. P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P246, and P2-55 with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. for the Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, at at, in the amount of$101,202 and 59 calendar days. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. B. PDC98-41: Ratify Change Order No. 15 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction for a net addition amount of$122,912 and 38 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $35,499,357. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 5 October 8, 1998 C. PDC98-42: Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Contract No. 3-38-3 and Project No. 2-R-97 with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for an amount of $39,889, and nine calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $5,112,758. It was brought to the attention of the Committee that the resolution referred to as 98-12 should be OCSD 98-8. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve this item. D. PDC98-43: Approve Professional Services Agreement for Improvements to Existing Mechanical Systems, Job No. J-62, to MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, Inc. for a total not to exceed $154,760. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. (15) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (16) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY None. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. (19) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 5, 1998. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Submitted by: ail Cain PDC Committee Secretary H:wip.ah�enpwocwnc9e1OclwMln0m.dw PDC COMMITTEE Mee°n9 Date TOIL ads. 10/8/96 10/MIN AGENDA REPORT M Number Item Nu 2!) 740 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Lud Airector of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 2, ET AL, JOBS NO. P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, and P2-55 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 6 to Jobs No. P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, and P2-55 with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. for the Maintenance Building at Plant 2, et al, in the amount of $101,202 and 59 calendar days. SUMMARY Change Order No. 6 is for three items of additional work to Jobs No. P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, and P2-55. There are no errors or omissions items associated with this Change Order. There is a 59-calendar day extension associated with this Change Order, which is not subject to Liquidated Damages. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 13.196.500.00 Previous Authorized Changes $ 403,356.00 Change Order No. 6 (Add)(Deddst) $ 101,202.00 Percent Increase 3.82% Amended Contract Price $ 13,701,058.00 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: A.6.a, B.6.a, B.61, B.8.1b) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) See attached Budget Information Table c� 19b M *e aan Fecau`PIX.+➢I.M-MFT CM dm a..»ed eaum Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. P2-35-3, Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, provides for a new 30,819 square foot, two-story steel frame with tilt-up concrete curtain walls structure, to house approximately 75 Maintenance personnel from Plant Maintenance, Instrumentation, Electrical, Mechanical and Collection Facilities. The building includes shops, offices, lunchroom, showers and locker rooms, library, and training rooms. Brown and Caldwell designed this job. Job No. P1-38-5, Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, provides for replacement and code updated potable water supplied fire protection throughout the Process Areas. The work also includes modifications to the existing City Water Pump Station including four new pumps, building signage to direct emergency crews, and a new high pressure plant water pump in the Digester Complex to supply the digester cleaning manifolds. Lee and Ro designed this job. Job No. P246, Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, provides for a new City Water Pump Station. The new City Water Pump Stations will house two 13,000-gallon air break tanks and seven pumps. Other work includes replacing pipes for the water distribution system for fire protection, building signage to direct emergency crews, and the demolition of the existing City Water Pump Station. Lee & Ro designed this job. Job No. P2-55, Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, provides for the demolition of the existing Chlorination Station and Caustic Storage Facility, and the construction of a 36-inch plant water by-pass line, a Bleach Station, and four Chemical Stations. Black and Veatch designed this job. The contract was awarded to Sverdrup Civil, Inc. on April 8, 1996. This contract is 90% complete. The following summarizes the change order. ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE NO. 1 Construct New Manhole $ 94 725.00 45 I Chan ed Condition 2 Fuse Size Revisions 2,631.00 0 De si n Chan e 3 Lighting Revisions 3 646.00 14 1 Design Change TOTAL-Change Order No. 6 $101 202.00 59 These items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered in the design phase. ALTERNATIVES None cmianwnro.^m o,.n newmwocv't.asar.rtccn an Page 2 y CEQA FINDINGS Job No. P2-55 is exempt. Notice of Exemption filed on April 30, 1993. Job No. P2-35-3, P1-38-5 and 13246 are not exempt. Final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989 and Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report Change Order UM:Ic G WkN11W^^Ga MM1ReVuh'A1L1P135JIJfLCB.M Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 2, et al JOB NO. P2.35-3 et al ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design $ 1,313,169 $ 1,313,169 $ 1 313 169 S 1,313,169 $ 1,313,169 $ 1,265,379 96% Construction $ 14,934,122 $ 14.934.122 $ 14,934,122 :Z E 13,599,856 $ 101.202 $ 13,701,058 $ 13,311.559 97% Staff and Support S 3758809 $ 3758809 $ 3758809 $ 3758809 $ 3758809 E 3012618 80% Contingency S $ - E TOTAL $ 20,006,100 $ 20,006,100 $ - $ 20,006,100 $ 18,671,834 $ 101.202 1 $ 18.773.036 1 $ 17,589,556 94% ..va.�yYm,.ae.n.vx�s�coeei. ti CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 2 et al Job No. P2-35-3, et al APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACTCOST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 2/28196 $ 13,196,500.00 $ 13,196,500.00 550 550 CO NO. 1 1/22197 $ 250,000.00 $ 13,446,500.00 1.89% 12 562 CO NO. 2' 3/21197 $ 23,916.00 $ 13,470,416.00 2.08% 0 562 CO N0 . 3' 8/19/97 $ 17,405.00 $ 13,487,821.00 2.21% 0 562 CO NO. 4 11/19/97 $ 80,611.00 $ 13,568,432.00 2.82% 27 589 CO NO. 5- 8/20/98 $ 31,424.00 $ 13,599,856.00 3.06% 43 632 CO NO. 6 Proposed $ 101,202.00 $ 13,701,058.00 3.82% 59 691 General Manager Approval per Resolution 98-12 H:...P2-35-3\co6StatusRepo rt V Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil Incorporated G.O. No.: Six(6) Date: October 28, 1998 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sionaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. 132-55 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Dedusl) $101,202.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. 132-35-3/ P2-46/ P2S5 ITEM 1 — CONSTRUCT NEW MANHOLE This item is for labor, equipment and material necessary for the construction of a new manhole on the 78-inch Miller-Holder influent sewer that was constructed in 1959. This item consists of excavation, dewatering and shoring, coredrilling the existing 78-inch reinforced concrete pipe, construction of a concrete saddle and 14 vertical feet of a 48-inch PVC lined concrete manhole shafting. It also involved connecting the undisclosed sewer lines found during the excavation to the new manhole. The Contract Drawings showed connecting the new Maintenance Building sewer to an existing 30-inch manhole. The indicated existing manhole was found to be a 12-inch Geanout that could not be used. The construction of this new manhole delayed the completion of the Maintenance Building, the City Water Pump Station and the Chemical Handling Facilities drainline connections and associated work items which were on the Project's Critical Path Schedule. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(2)(b) of the General Provisions. Reference: Sverdrup Serial Letter No.116; Plan Change No.25. (P2-35-3 =33.3%) , (P246=33.3%) 8 (P2-55 =33.3%) COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $94,725.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 45 Calendar Days Page 2 of 4 W ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Sverdrup Civil Incorporated C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: October 28, 1998 Job: Maintenance Buildino at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Signaoe and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection, Signace and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 P2 75-3f P2-46 ITEM 2—FUSE SIZE REVISIONS This item is for the labor and material necessary for the revision of fuse sizes in the 12kva switchgear at Distribution Center"D". This work consists of relocating six S&C 40 E fuses that were provided for transformers MBB and QBB to protect transformers CWA and CWB, install S&C 50E fuses to protect transformer MBB, and S&C 65E fuses to feed transformer OBB. This work was recommended by Westinghouse's Coordination Study dated September 30, 1997, which was completed after this project's notice to proceed was given. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. Reference: Sverdrup Serial Letter No.140; Field Change Order No. 29. (P2-35-3=50%) &(P2-46=50%) COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,631.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days P2-35-3 ITEM 3—LIGHTING REVISIONS This item is for the labor and material necessary to provide additional light fixtures for the kitchen and lunchroom and to revise the type of light fixtures for stairways No. 1 & No. 3 of the Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. This work consists of adding four light fixtures and revising six light fixtures from recessed to surface mounted. This work provides for better illumination. The new fixtures selected are an improvement over the specified fixtures. This is a design change by the Engineering Department. The lighting revisions caused delays to other work in the area resulting in a time extension. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. Reference: Sverdrup Serial Letter Nos. 141 & 143; Field Change Order Nos. 30 & 32. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,846.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $101,202.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 59 Calendar Days a y Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Sverdrup Civil Incorporated C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: October 28. 1998 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Jab No. P11-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 59 day extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: April 8, 1996 Original Contract Time: 550 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 9, 1997 Time Extension this C.O.: 59 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 141 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 691 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: February 27, 1998 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $13,196,500.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 403,356.00 This Change (Add) (13eduot) $ 101,202.00 Amended Contract Price $13,701,058.00 P Page 4 of 4 k ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Sverdrup Civil Incorporated C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: October 28, 1998 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Signaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2.46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 Board Authorization Date: October 28, 1998 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. Contractor Date H'Av Mai ngU08S 8 CONTRACTS1 23 \CO6.E PDC COMMITTEE Wftng Da[e TOJb Bds. 10/8/98 1 10/28/98 •� AGENDA REPORT Item Number Iteq Nu Orange County Sanitation Dls1n FROM: David Ludwin, Ir ctor of Engineering Originator: Patrick Pan, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO P1-36-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 15 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, with Margate Construction for a net addition amount of$122,912 and 38 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to $35,499,357. SUMMARY Change Order No. 15 includes fourteen items of added work to Job No. P1-36-2. There are five omission items associated with this change order. There is a 38 day time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $35,291.000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 85,445.00 This Change (Add) $ 122,912.00 Change Orders to Date $ 208,357.00 Percentage Increase 0.59% Amended Contract Price $35,499,357.00 Value Engineering Credits $ 329,194.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Une hem: A.3.b) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Refer to the attached Budget Information Table ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • Job No. P1-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, consists of expanding the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. The project provides ten new secondary clarifiers, replacement of the return activated sludge (RAS) pumps, replacement of the existing aeration system, renovation of existing blowers, renovation of three existing dissolved air flotation thickeners (DAF), three new dissolved air flotation thickeners (DAF) and other improvements. These improvements will increase the secondary treatment capacity from forty-six million gallons per day to eighty million gallons per day. The contract also includes a new pump station for the Orange County Water District for which the District will be reimbursed. Carollo Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate on September 18, 1995. This contract is 98% complete. The following summarizes the change order. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Instrument Air Piping Addition for $ 22,671 0 Design Change RAS Valves 2 Remove Step Feed Divider Wall 10,823 7 Omission 3 Add Stop Plate Guides at Mixed 27,322 14 Design Change Liquor Channel 4 Provide Bypass Around Industrial 1,138 0 Design Change Water Booster Pumps 5 Reseal Annular Space at RAS Pipe 12,737 7 Design Change Penetrations 6 Add Area Drain at DAF 7,275 0 Omission 7 Add Valves and Actuators to Air 1,245 0 Omission Supply Line at Bulk Polymer Pump 8 Add Filters to Instrument Air Dryer 2,790 0 Design Change 9 Revise Mounting for Polymer Feed 1,438 0 Design Change Pump Discharge Pressure Switches 10 Replace Skimmer Arms at DAF 16,165 0 Changed No. 2 Condition 11 Add Air Release Piping for Return 8,343 0 Omission Actuated Sludge Pumps 12 Add Water Pressure Reducing 1,541 0 Design Change Valves at DAF 13 Instrument Air Supply to Secondary 9,424 0 Omission Clarifiers and DAF 14 Testing Delays to RAS Pump 0 10 Other Station TOTAL - Change Order No. 15 $122,912 1 38 All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the design phase. c R,�Po 1- swR. 15. Page 2 ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order PP:Ic cWgJow enm Dnn Re ftW li 2AIRc 16 : Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design $ 1.406.065 $ 1.406,065 $ 1,406.065 $ 1.406,065 $ 1,406,065 $ 1,302,300 93% Construction $ 35.835,690 $ 35,835,690 $ 35.835.690 $ 35,376,445 $ 122,912 $ 35.499.357 $ 35.143.870 99% Staff and Support $ 3.358.245 1 $ 3.558.2451 IS 3,558,245 1 $ 3,558,245 Is 3.558,245 1 $ 2,680,523 75% TOTAL $ 40.600,000 $ 40.800,000 $ - $ 40,800,000 1 $ 40,340.755 $ 122,912 $ 40,463,667 $ 39,126,693 1 97% Hkw 41aWr&u49e11P 1362 Revis 00125198 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE TIME TIME DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) TO DATE (DAYS) CONTRACT 6/28/95 $ 35,291,000.00 $ 35,291,000.00 0.00 900 900 CO NO. 1 11/22/95 $ (297.500.00) $ 34,993,500.00 (0.84) 0 900 CO NO.2 6/6196 $ - $ 34,993,500.00 (0.84) 0 900 CO NO. 3 8/28/96 $ (100.226.00) $ 34,893,274.00 (1.13) 0 900 CO NO.4 9/25/96 $ 24.733.00 $ 34,918,007.00 (1.06) 0 900 "CO NO. 5 1013/96 $ 29,251.00 $ 34,947,258.00 (0.97) 0 900 CO NO. 6 3/26197 $ 179,966.00 $ 35,127,224.00 (0.46) 0 900 CO NO. 7 4/23/97 $ 130,573.00 $ 35,257,797.00 (0.09) 28 928 'CO NO. 8 4/24/97 $ - $ 35,257,797.00 (0.09) 98 1026 "CO NO. 9 8/7/97 $ (2,479.00) $ 35,256,318.00 (0.10) 0 1026 'CO NO. 10 10/16/97 $ 6.966.00 $ 35,262,284.00 (0.08) 0 1026 CO NO. 11 12/17/97 $ 69,628.00 $ 35,331,912,00 0.12 0 1026 'CO NO. 12 418/98 $ 22.651.00 $ 35,354,563.00 0.18 0 1026 'CO NO. 13 6/24/98 $ (8,272.00) $ 35,346,291.00 0.16 17 1043 "CO NO. 14 9/3/98 $ 30,154.00 $ 35,376,446.00 0.24 15 1058 CO NO. 15 Pending $ 122,912.00 $ 35,499,357.00 0.59 38 1096 'Approval by General Manager per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-12 "Approval by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 98-12 P1362CO Stat Rpt Page 1 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 109" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Fifteen (15) Date: October 28, 1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Imorovements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Bedusk) $ 122,912.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — INSTRUMENT AIR (IA) PIPING ADDITION FOR RETURN ACTUATED SLUDGE (RAS) VALVES This item provides the following: 1. Replace existing steel IA line with a new stainless steel (SS) line in the existing clarifier area. This work was performed to meet new District Standards which were established after this project was in the construction phase. 2. Provide a new SS IA supply tubing to the RAS valves in lieu of the specified steel air pipe. This was a request from District staff due to the fact that IA provides cleaner air and SS is more suitable for use with sensitive control devices. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-82) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 22,671.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 — REMOVE STEP FEED CHANNEL DIVIDER WALL IN EXISTING AERATION BASINS This item is for extra work to remove a portion of the divider wall inside the Step Feed Channel between Aeration Basins 5 and 6. This work was necessary to avoid conflict with construction of new deck openings. The divider wall was not shown in the original contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-92) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 10,823.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days Page 2 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10344 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Fifteen (15) Date: October 28, 1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 3—ADD STOP PLATE GUIDES AT SECONDARY CLARIFIER MIXED LIQUOR CHANNELS This item includes the labor and material for the addition of two stainless steel (SS) stop plate guides and one 7.5 foot x 6.5 foot stop plate in the Secondary Clarifier mixed liquor channel. This addition will give the District's staff the flexibility of shutting off flow to a portion of the clarifiers while maintaining a reasonable amount of capacity. As originally designed, mixed liquor channel shutdowns would have to be for all of the eastside or westside clarifiers at once. This is an improvement over the original design as per District Staffs request. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-89, PCH P1362-42) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $27.322.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days ITEM 4— PROVIDE BYPASS AROUND INDUSTIAL WATER(IW) BOOSTER PUMPS This item is for providing bypass piping around the IW booster pumps in the DAF basement. The booster pump system supplies seal water at high pressure for certain operating conditions. The District changed the supply water to the IW system during the construction phase of this project. The IW system is now charged with reclaimed water from the Green Acres Project (GAP) which has sufficient pressure for current use. The new bypass will allow the booster pumps to be turned off when not needed to save additional pumping costs. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-100) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 1.138.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5— RESEAL ANNULAR SPACE AT EXISTING RAS PIPE PENETRATIONS This item is for labor and materials to reseal the annular space between the wall sleeve and the existing 18-Inch RAS pipe penetrations at the North wall of the Aeration Basins at the step feed channels. This work was necessary because the existing seals were leaking. This work was not included in the contract. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-104) ADDED COST FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,737.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days Page 3 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Fifteen (15) Date: October 28, 1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No 1 Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 6 —ADD AREA DRAIN BETWEEN DAF FACILITY AND SECONDARY CLARIFIERS This item adds an area drain and 100 feet of 4-inch DIP piping between the DAF facility and the Secondary Clarifiers. The construction of the new DAF changed the existing site drainage and created a low spot where rainwater will pond. This additional drain will allow removal of this ponded water and increase the life of the new paving to be installed in this area. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-116, PCH P1362-52) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,275.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7—ADD VALVE AND ACTUATOR TO AIR SUPPLY LINE AT BULK POLYMER PUMP This item adds a valve with an actuator to the high-pressure air supply line for the Bulk Polymer Feed Pump No. 2. This work is necessary to achieve the ability to control air supply to the pump. This valve and actuator were omitted from the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-118) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,245.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8 —ADD FILTERS AT AERATION BASIN INSTRUMENT AIR DRYER This item adds a prefilter and an after filter to the Instrument Air piping at the Aeration Basin instrument air dryer. This item also provides by-pass piping for this dryer. The additional filters and the by-pass will improve the maintenance and operation of the system. This item was accomplished by Contractor force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-120, PCH P136249) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2.790.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 103" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Fifteen (15) Date: October 28, 1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. Pt-36-2 ITEM 9— REVISE MOUNTING FOR POLYMER FEED PUMP DISCHARGE PRESSURE SWITCHES This item revises the mounting of six pressure switches and six pressure gauges at the Polymer Feed Pump Discharge Piping. The mounting was changed to add support to the instruments to prevent damage due to normal maintenance (wash down) in the area. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-121) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1.438.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10—REPLACE SKIMMER ARMS AT DAF NO. 2 This item is for removing and replacing six existing 20 foot steel skimmer arms at DAF No. 2. The existing arms are badly deteriorated and in need of replacement. The deterioration was discovered when the basin was shutdown for contract work. This work was not included in the original contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractors pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-126) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 16,165.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 11 —ADD AIR RELEASE PIPING FOR RETURN ACTUATED SLUDGE PUMPS This item is for additional work in adding 1 '/,inch air release piping for all five RAS pumps. This addition will improve performance of pumps by keeping air from becoming trapped in the pump volutes. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-127) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,343.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ,r Page 5 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Fifteen (15) Date: October 28. 1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 12—ADD WATER PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES (PRVs) AT DAF COMPLEX This item is for labor and material to add two PRVs to the potable water supply for the laboratory, men's and woman's restrooms, and janitorial closet in the DAF Complex. The current water pressure in the plant potable water system is significantly higher than that what was expected during design. Adding these valves will improve reliability of the fixtures in this complex by providing a safe working pressure. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-131) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,541.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 13 —INSTRUMENT AIR SUPPLY TO SECONDARY CLARIFIERS AND DAF SUMP PUMP BUBBLER PANELS This item is for providing Instrument Air piping for the Sump Pump bubbler panels in Secondary Clarifier tunnel and DAF basement. This piping was omitted from the Contract Drawings but was necessary for bubbler panel operation. . This item was negotiated with the Contractors pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362.137) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9.424.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 14—TESTING DELAYS TO RAS PUMP STATION This item adds 10 calendar days to the project schedule for delays in the testing schedule for the RAS Pump Station. The delays resulted from District's coordination problems, and from difficulties with the Consultant supplied software testing. This item was negotiated with the Contractors pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362- 137) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 122,912.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 38 Calendar Days e a Page 6 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Fifteen (15) Dale: October 28, 1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 38 calendar day time extension is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 18, 1995 Original Contract Time: 900 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 5, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 38 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 196 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 1,096 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: September 17, 1998 Projected Completion Date: October 30, 1998 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $35,291,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 85,445.00 This Change Order(Add) $ 122, 912.00 Amended Contract Price $35,499,357.00 Page 7 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Fifteen (15) Date: October 28, 1998 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 Board Acceptance Date: October 28, 1998 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Su fitted by' O , nstruction Manager Date Owl y: /0 /3--?? Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: M ATE O�IST U M o f Z�9 Contractor to PDC COMMITTEE MeeBng Date To JLBds. 10/08/98 10/28/98 AGENDA REPORT Rem Numbe I[em Nu by g-K3 Orange County Sanitation Di FROM: David Lud ' , Rector of Engineering Originator: Jim Hams, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-62 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement for Improvements to Existing Mechanical Systems, Job No. J-62, to MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, Inc, for a total not to exceed $154,760, SUMMARY In October 1996, the District's Operations and Maintenance Department completed a preliminary study exploring the possibility of reducing the amount of reclaimed and potable water used in the wastewater treatment facilities. Based on the study, Staff recommended changes resulting in Job No. J-62, Improvements to Existing Mechanical Systems. The preliminary study identified six areas to be modified at each plant including mechanical modifications to existing equipment and processes. District's staff will implement the recommended changes to complete five of the six areas at an estimated installation cost of $11,000. Modifications to be completed by staff include installation of water efficient faucets, flushometers, and irrigation control equipment. The sixth item is included in this PSA for further investigation and definition. The estimated simple payback is approximately 2.5 years. Staff has also identified other areas for investigation that could also provide additional operational savings beyond those discussed in the 1996 preliminary study. The selected consultant for Job No. J-62 will further define the proposed modifications to determine the scope and maximum cost effectiveness of the work. Only modifications found to optimize treatment plant performance with a payback of less that seven years will be considered for construction. Staff has solicited proposals from four firms for this project. Based on the proposal evaluations, Staff recommends award of a PSA for Improvements to Mechanical Systems, Job No. J-62, to MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, Inc. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total amount of the agreement will not exceed $154,760. The funds for this project, $1,473,000, are contained in the FY 1998-99 Capital Improvement Budget. Any portion of the study found to reduce water consumption may qualify for offset funds available through the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC). The funds provided through MWDOC may include up to 50 percent of the design and construction costs. GWabbaM anda Dnn R&MftP Ql-0N$$AR4W Rmn 1� Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT t ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2.a, Inter-Plant Joint Facilities) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) See attached Budget Information Table ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In October 1996, the District's Operations and Maintenance Department completed a preliminary study exploring the possibility of reducing the amount of reclaimed water used in the wastewater treatment facilities. The study identified six areas to be modified at each plant. This study resulted in Job No. J-62, Improvements to Existing Mechanical Systems. This project requires the following modifications to existing equipment and processes to provide optimal water efficiency in the plants: • Eliminating once-through cooling in Central Generation Facilities and Control Center • Installing soil moisture sensors and irrigation timers • Modifying irrigation practices • Retrofitting toilets to reduce water consumption • Installing faucet aerators in locker rooms • Replacing locker room shower heads The scope of this Professional Services Agreement is to investigate only the systems at the Central Generation Facilities and Control Center. The remaining five items will be completed by the District's Maintenance Staff and require no additional professional studies. Subsequent to the 1996 Preliminary Study, Staff identified the following additional areas that may also produce considerable operational savings: • Eliminating once-through cooling in air and digester gas compressors and the cooling water systems for buildings • Improving efficiency of chillers • Modifying hot and chilled water loops • Monitoring office building and control systems • Modifying belt press wash water • Implementing a reclaimed water dechlorination system The selected consultant will investigate the above points as well as the modifications to the cooling systems at the Central Generation Facilities and the Control Center, and define the best solution for each. Those issues found to be economically feasible to construct and provide long term savings to the District will be designed and constructed in the near future. The final design and construction phases are not included in this Professional Services Agreement since the magnitude of the work is not yet defined. c R.�.Mv 2W.es R.. „ Page 2 Staff has solicited proposals from four firms qualified for the project. Two firms declined to propose due to unavailability of mechanical engineering staff. Based on the proposal V' evaluation of the remaining two firms, MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, Inc., demonstrated the best understanding of and approach to the Scope of Work. Staff recommends award of a Professional Services Agreement for Improvements to Existing Mechanical Systems, Job No. J-62, to MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, Inc. ALTERNATIVES No cost-effective alternatives to the comprehensive studies are available. Delays in the award of the PSA will postpone valuable cost savings in operation and maintenance expenditures. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation JRH:jo:jam caVloean^ "ounn.oeaW a Ak. R. 1� Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING MECHANICAL SYSTEMS JOB NO. J-62 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT7TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%( Consultant $ 133,000 $ 133,000 $ 27,000 $ 160.000 $ 154760 S 154.760 0% Staff $ 69,000 $ 69,000 $ 69,000 $ 69,000 $ 69,000 0% Construction I $ 948,000 S 948.000 $ 948.000 $ - IS 0% Contingency $ 323.000 S 323,000 E (27.0001 $ 296,000 $ - E 0% Other E $ S - $ 0% TOTAL $ 1,473,000 $ 1.473,000 $ - $ 1.473,000 $ - E 223760 $ 223,760 5 0% G:NI&WOna .d.R.P ftWE2W Bu4yer T.W. RWW W29a K � Professional Services Agreement Status Report IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Job No. J-62 Total Project Budget: $1,473,000 Consultant: MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, Incorporated Start Date of Project: August 1, 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Proposed Ori final PSA Im rovements to Existing Mech. S stems J-62 $154,760 $0 GM910bellAgenda Drell RepoftTE)CVF2V-82-AR-PSA SIatm RepoR.dw 08/31/98 V Improvements to Existing Mechanical Systems, Job No. J-62 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Boyle Engineering • Brown and Caldwell • Carollo Engineers • MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers Boyle Engineering and Brown and Caldwell declined to submit a proposal due to the unavailability of mechanical engineers. As a result, two consulting firms submitted proposals on August 6, 1998. Proposals were reviewed and ranked the Engineering Project Manager assigned to this project. Each proposal was compared, in seven categories described below: 1. Total Experience—Rates the team's overall total number of years experience perfuming engineering services 2. Applicable Related Project Experience—Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to study and design of primary treatment facilities 3. Applicable Recent Projects—Rates the team's recent experience androles performing engineering services as it relates directly to study and design of primary treatment facilities 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualificatlons as they relate to study and design of primary treatment facilities 5. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants—Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subconsultants to consultant team 6. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work—Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work Included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown 7. Value of the Firm(s) —Rates the firm(s) past expedence with the District's, overall reputation with the District's, size and depth of the the whole firm(s), location of the team members, etc... The comparison of each proposal resulted in the following rankings for the above seven categories: Category 1. MSE demonstrated more experience related to power generation, heat recovery, and wastewater treatment. The use of a specialized subconsullant to assist in the study was the deciding factor. ESA has worldwide experience in power generation and heat recovery systems. c HW�mvroaem.onn awomwocvaawn enmamnan.az aen.aa:mrviea 1 4 Category 2 MSE listed many similar projects where systems were reviewed and recommendations (and designs) were completed to improve system performance. Category 3 MSE listed many similar projects where systems were reviewed and recommendations (and designs) were completed to improve system performance. Category 4 MSE has enlisted several specialty firms to assist in the design study. Demonstrated more specialized experience in the power system and heat recovery fields. Category 5 MSE demonstrated that specially consultants will enhance the field study and the final product. Category 6 MSE demonstrated the value of field investigation to determine actual conditions. The field studies will greatly improve the overall documentation and will be the basis of the Final design. Category 7 Carollo Engineers has been providing quality wastewater treatment plant designs for over 30 years. Their knowledge of the plants and systems are excellent. The following is a summary of the proposals: MacDonald-Stephens. Engineers (MSE) MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers proposes to provide several mechanical engineers dedicated to this project. The proposal demonstrated a complete understanding of job requirements and includes the field survey and documentation required to fully understanding the systems to be investigated. MSE has included a team of subconsultants to assist them in the evaluation. These include ADS Environmental (field measurements), ESA (power industry consultant), Truesdail Laboratories (flow measurements), and CH2Mhill (programming requirements). They have a solid plan to optimize mechanical equipment systems. Carollo Carollo has a solid understanding of the District's goals and objectives. They have excellent staff mechanical engineers available for this detailed study. The Carollo work approach did not include the field investigation staff believes is necessary to adequately understand the complete operation of the existing systems. The proposal also did not address programming requirements. N WWV .a an nepwmwoCVammewm.mom,.mz na;.aa.osrvree 2 Based on the proposal evaluation and consultant interviews, Staff selected the MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, as the top-rated consultant. After comparing the proposals, the fee proposals submitted by the four candidates were reviewed. The top ranked consultant, MSE, also submitted the lowest fee proposal for the requested scope of work. Staff recommends MSE to be awarded the PSA for the detailed Study for the Improvements to Existing Mechanical Systems, Job No. J-62, for a total fee not to exceed $154,760. GMiglobaMgenda Draft Rap rlsWDCUL2\Staff avaluatalion Am c�wmma.od.u.a Remm� as eni..wond: R.v,..d Dermas 3 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, October 21, 1998, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on October 21, 1998 at 5:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel George Brown, Chair Toby Weissen, Carollo Engineers John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Ryal Wheeler, Foreman & Citizen Barry Denes Burnie Dunlap, Chair STAFF PRESENT: Norman Z. Eckenrode Mark Leyes Don McIntyre, General Manager William G. Steiner Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Mike Petennan, Director of Human Resources Gary Streed, Director of Finance Directors Absent: Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology John M. Gullixson Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Mark A. Murphy Mike White, Controller Thomas R. Saltarelli Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Manager Dawn McKinley, Sr. Human Resources Analyst Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Mark Reed, representing the Supervisory and Professional Management Group, addressed the Committee and stated that the group has been trying to negotiate a new contract since their recent contract expired in June. Since they have been unable to reach a settlement, a meeting has been set up with State mediators tomorrow. Mr. Reed reviewed the group's position on the issues involved. OCSD • P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain valley,CA 9272E-8127 . (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting ' Page 2 October 21, 1998 (4) RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE DRAFT MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the September 9, 1998 Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Brown advised that there would be no meeting in November due to the Veteran's Day and Thanksgiving holidays, and that the next regularly scheduled meeting will be on December 9, 1998. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Don McIntyre advised the Committee that there is a report on tonight's agenda regarding government parcels that have not been billed for user fees. He stated that the Grand Jury has contacted him and would like to discuss the issue. He and Gary Streed are scheduled to meet with Mark Gresham and his group from the Grand Jury a week from Thursday. (7) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson reported that negotiations started yesterday with Kern Countys staff regarding the biosolids matter. After only two hours, an effective agreement was reached on what the terms of an MOU could be. This item will be brought to the District's Board next Wednesday, and to Kern County's Board of Supervisors next Tuesday. The deal points are that $2.12 a ton for the first year will be charged with a traffic study to be conducted later to confirm what the impacts are. The prepayment for the District is $750.000. to be credited back over time as part of the ongoing fees. The prepayment will not be made until a long-term ordinance has been adopted by Kern County's Board of Supervisors. The fee may eventually be down to $1 per ton, once solid data is received. Blake stated that the District's Board must determine whether any host fees should be charged by Kem County. There are discernible impacts on the roads and there are costs to administer the program. He advised there is a considerable amount of political heat from both the opponents and proponents of biosolids in Kern County. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE • The Treasurer's Report was placed before the Committee prior to the meeting in accordance with the Investment Policy and Government Code requirements. • Mr. Streed announced that Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, is out of town on training and requested that he inform the Committee that she received two phone calls from reporters from the RE9istef and the Times regarding collecting user fees for city-owned buildings. At this point neither of the reporters have indicated any interest in writing a story, and are currently only interested in collecting facts, however, this happened prior to the Grand Jurys request to set up a meeting. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources did not make a report. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 October 21, 1998 (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS The Director of Communications was not in attendance. (11) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Tom Woodruff reported that the District was served with a Summons and Complaint yesterday afternoon by 13 of our former employees who were either terminated or resigned as a result of the drug investigation. Tom advised he will keep the Committee updated on this issue. (12) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS (Items A-C) A. FAHR98-72: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of Septembert 1998: The Treasurers Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. B. FAHR98-73: Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. C. FAHR98-74: Receive and file Employment Status Report. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 12(A), 12(B), and 12(C) under Consent Calendar. (13) ACTION ITEMS (Items A- C) A. FAHR98-75: Receive and file initial report of General Manager-approved purchases in amounts exceeding $50,000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. B. FAHR98-76: Receive and file status report on staffs efforts to review the Assessors data base for undercharged and uncharged parcels. Committee Discussion: Gary Streed gave a status report on the progress staff has made after receiving direction from the Committee to find a way to either find an alternate staff person, or hire an outside contractor, to review the Assessors data base for proper classifications of properties, for proper square footage, or any square footage of buildings. He also gave a progress report to date on resolving the government-owned parcels issue. Mr. Streed advised that the Assessor has told his Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 October 21, 1998 staff that there are only 1,050 governmentally owned parcels with development that may be using the sewer, which is a significantly lower figure than originally thought. We will be evaluating a way to identify and visit those parcels and get their square footage, he advised. Director Leyes reported that he also has spoken to Jason Kendal of the Times, and discussed with him some of his own perspectives on the govemment-owned parcels issue. Director Leyes has now referred Mr. Kendal back to Gary Streed. After discussion on this item, it was the consensus of the Committee that staff should be given some direction on how to proceed on this item. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to direct staff to proceed to develop a scope of work and a Request for Proposals for the appropriate services. If, necessary, this item can be brought to the Steering Committee next month. C. FAHR98-77: Adjust the pay ranges of the Assistant General Manager, the Director of Communications, and the Director of Information Technology positions After considerable discussion on this item, the Committee agreed that in order for the Board to make informed decisions, establish a position, and give Gear direction to Executive Management, a workshop should be held. It was further agreed that the Steering Committee will discuss this issue and decide on a date for the workshop. Director Collins requested that staff provide the Board with the number of employees each Manager supervisors during the workshop. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the current pay levels, including the unpaid July 1998 adjustments, out of range for the Assistant General Manager, Director of Communications, Director of Information Technology, and Controller positions, and adjust the pay ranges at a later date. (14) INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION A. OMTS-030: Year 2000 (Y2K) Date Change Compliance Project Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology, gave a slide presentation regarding the Year 2000 (Y2K) Date Change Project for the Committee's information. The OMITS Committee reviewed the Y2K report at their meeting of October 14, 1998, and will be making a recommendation to the Board of Directors on October 28th. (15) OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. ' Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 October 21, 1998 (16) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (17) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (18) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for December 9, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. (19) CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by Government Code Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item 19(A)(1) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 6:43 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item 19 (A)(1). At 7:10 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 7:12 p.m. Submitted by: � J Iu,'� Cerlora Crane FAHR Committee Secretary 1YMmWbIbPWeYmI]iWerolFAiFkNMYflCtM1NM10f1.bt • FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date TU JL"S. 10/21/98 1001119E AGENDA REPORT Ie12(mEe i111,7NuMba 10 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 1998 (FAHR98-72) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of September 1996. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Districts Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) kY don me l y.E OnWlftMIOTAHRTAHR�up W GAHRB}Rvtlt R"" 1d,791 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of September 1998 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. On September 22, 1998, $20 million was withdrawn from the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio to meet current and projected cash flow requirements. The funds are deposited in IAIF until they are needed. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts September 30, 1998 Yield(%) Slate of Calif. LAIF $ 18.353.682 5.7 Union Bank Checking Account 462,427 4e Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 2,611.000 5.1 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 18.187.311 5.3 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 277.985,163 4.3 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 6,679 5.5 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,626,142 8.2 Petty Cash 4,400 WA TOTAL $350,217,804 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. %YdmWSW1M ,Mn121PnvndTAHRWAHR8810.T UPM FAHRB72W R_n langl Page 2 V ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Reports 3. Book Balances Barchart GGS:SK:lc 1WGOnWatlIW,ftlfinlYl nN MWAHFB910u GBS NFAHP86'/2wtk R. : 1W?W Page 3 ReportPrepared by Finance. 10/1 3M, 8:33 AM Monthly Treasurer's District Fund Balance 11 1 / 1 111 IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII uunun 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1.1.1.11� .1.1.1.1.1 �111111111 111111111, 11•1♦1•111 1•1•1•1•1, 1 . 1.1.....1. �� • .. �....-.... .�.. Debt Service Reserves u LAIF R _ MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING ((or the month ending 30 September 1998) Liquid Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: $18,188,362 MEW $18,187,311 Historical Cost: PIMCO $18,179,604 Mellon $18,179,576 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.20 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss) of 1%Change: $36,725 (0.20%) 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 73% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return ("/"): 1 Month: 0.51 3 Months: 1.49 12 Months: 5.74 Year-to-Date: 4.28 Index Total Rate of Return(%): 1 Month: 0.41 .. A MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 11WESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 30 September 1998) Long Term Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: 0elo° FA428399 Historical Cost: PIMCO $272,210,865 Mellon $272,266,917 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.50 Of Index: 2.32 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,069,095 15.IA REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: °AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 1.84 3 Months: 3.86 12 Months: 9.54 Year-to-Date: 7.44 Index Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 1.79 A OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR RASE: USD 30-SEP-1998 HB1100 8 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,551,956.28 2,551,956.28 13.90% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3,458,039.00 3,459,039.00 18.83% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 3,156,158.22 3,156,158.22 17.19% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 2,667,368.09 2,667,368.09 14.531 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 2,872,544.25 2,872,544.25 15.64% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 148,244.96 148,244.96 0.81% 0.00 7,537.55 5.09 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,054,310.80 14,854,310.80 80.091 0.00 7,531.55 0.05 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,325,265.63 3,333,000.00 18.159 7,734.37 210,375.00 6.31 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,325,265.63 3,333,000.00 18.154 7,734.37 210,375.00 6.31 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 175,709.64 175,709.64 0.96% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 175,799.64 175,789.64 0.96% 0.00 0.00 0.00 :==-----=-=------ -------=-----=---= —=---- ----------------- ----ee==== ___ ==eves. NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 18,355,366.07 18,363,100.44 100.001 7,734.37 217,912.55 1.19 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-SEP-1999 HB1100 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 1,000,509.05 1,000,509.05 0.35% 0.00 0.00 0.00 RECEIVABLES 117,422.00 117,422.00 0.04% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -95,323,678.69 -95,323,678.69 -33.75% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 3,480,088.42 3,480,008.42 1.23% 0.00 176,945.90 5.08 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS -90,725,659.22 -90,725,659.22 -32.12% 0.00 176,945.90 -0.20 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 181,010,043.02 185,474,752.56 65.67% 4,464,709.54 11,818,108.88 6.37 U.S. AGENCIES 27,095,812.25 28,188,875.00 9.98% 1,093,062.75 1,668,350.00 5.92 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 13,248,203.06 13,288,340.00 4.71% 40,136.94 845,000.00 6.36 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 8,525,854.41 8,519,928.35 3.02% -5,926.06 580,521.96 6.81 FHLMC POOLS 27,167,402.37 27,104,145.16 9.63% 16,742.79 1,831,298.66 6.74 FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,602,294.81 7,740,671.33 2.74% 138,376.52 478,694.56 6.18 FNMA POOLS 4,365,018.14 4,382,624.50 1.55% 17,606.36 266,370.66 6.08 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGA 192,717.53 194,354.24 0.07% 1,636.71 11,954.90 6.15 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 313,323.97 315,396.77 0.11% 2,072.90 19,426.08 6.16 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 5,000,000.00 4,995,650.00 1.77% -4,350.00 291,150.00 5.83 BANKING 4 FINANCE 71,070,872.04 71,306,934.17 25.25% 236,062.13 4,293,658.82 6.02 INDUSTRIAL 9,903,780.00 9,436,500.00 3.34% -467,280.00 832,500.00 8.82 UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,663,650.00 2.71% 166,395.00 450,000.00 5.87 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 362,992,576.50 360,691,822.08 130.54% 5,699,245.58 23,387,034.52 6.34 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,459,256.40 4,459,256.40 1.58% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,459,256.40 4,459,256.40 1.58% 0.00 0.00 0.00 =ve___-----_----__ _eee==e==e===----- -----== ----------------- ---------====___ -.---o NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 276,726,173.68 282,425,419.26 100.00% 5,699,245.58 23,563,980.42 8.34 --- Page 1 � „ VLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF07511102 1998/09/30 RUN DATE 10/02/98 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 13.03.58 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ................. ............................. ---- ....... ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 148,244.96 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HURT .000 5.204 AAA 100.000 148,244.96 .99 996085247 148,244.96 .82 800,000.00 FORD MR CR CO DISC 5.237 .000 P-1 98.282 786,259.78 5.29 34539MTS 01/27/1999 786,259.78 4.32 2,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN NTD CORP DISC 5.354 .000 P-1 96.708 2,665,119.00 17.94 313397577 MAT 12/11/1998 2,665,119.00 14.65 800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN NTG CORP DISC 5.448 .000 P-1 99.215 792,920.00 5.33 31339TH49 MAT 11/06/1998 792,920.00 4.36 2,900,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC 5.462 .000 P-1 99.053 2,872,544.25 19.33 313313L63 MAT 10/23/1998 2,872,544.25 15.79 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL ME LN M CONS DISC 5.485 .000 P-1 98.811 2,371,454.67 15.96 313WSK70 MAT 10/16/1998 2,371,454.67 13.04 900,000.00 IBM DIM 5.494 .000 P-1 98.113 803,021.50 5.94 44922BM06 01/13/1999 883,021.50 4.86 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MG ASSM DISC 5.495 .000 P-1 98.630 5,156,158.22 21.24 313589N41 MAT 11/06/1998 3,156,258.22 17.35 900,000.00 GMAC DISC 5.60E .000 P-1 98.075 882,675.00 5.94 37042ELJ0 11/18/1998 882,675.00 4.85 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 6.138 .000 P-1 98.636 295,913.42 1.99 31338SL20 MAT 10/19/1998 295,913.42 1.63 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.329 .097 14,854,310.80 100.00 14,854,330.80 81.67 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.589 6.322 AAA 101.000 3,325,265.63 100.00 912827K72 06.3757. 05/15/1999 DO 05/15/96 3,333,000.00 18.33 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 2 OMFO7511102 1998/09/30 RUN DATE 10/02/98 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 13.03.58 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE Y. TOTAL TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES S.SBS 6.312 3U325,265.63 100.00 3,333,000.00 18.33 TOTAL 5.340 .347 18,179t576.43 100.00 18t187,330.80 100.00 LDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE t 3 CSF07522202 1996/09/30 RUN DATE t 10/02/98 RANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 13.03.58 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DISCRIPtION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ................. ..................... ........ ....... ....... ....... ........ ------------ CASH 0 CASH EQUIVALENTS 3,450,088.42 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NGHT .000 S.2E4 AM 100.000 3,480,U08.42 100.00 996055247 3,460,088.42 .94 TOTAL CASH L CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 5.204 3,480,068.42 100.00 3,480,088.42 .9e FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT .000 5.615 A2 99.653 11992,800.00 .54 066365DN4 FITG RT 05/11/20DS DD OS/11/98 1,993,060.00 .54 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MIN .ODO 5.804 A2 100.031 3,498,635.00 .94 17120QEBO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DD 04/08/98 3,501,085.00 .94 467,473.96 FNMA POOL 80065561 .000 6.035 AM 101.125 470,833.93 .12 31362MM7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DD 09/01/88 472,733.04 .13 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CD TERM ENHANCED .000 5.792 Al 99.931 1,998,613.60 .54 345397SCO FLTG RT OB/27/2006 DD 08/27/98 1,998,613.60 .m 4,000,000.DD FORD MR CR NTH TRANCHE DID 96 .000 5.480 Al 99.992 3,970,480.00 1.08 345402DZ1 FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 3,999,650.00 1.07 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR 8 00177 .000 5.346 Al 99.890 6,999,748.00 1.92 M4 62HU3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 71092,190.00 1.91 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP HIS .000 5.800 A2 99.782 31918,768.50 1.06 3704ZSQV5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 DD 08/17/98 3,%1,389.00 1.06 3,000,000.00 MILLER FINL INC SR NT .000 6.175 A3 100.208 2,999,310.00 .81 423328AZ6 FLTG BY 04/27/1999 DD 04/27/94 31006,240.00 .81 4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL HTM .000 5.896 A3 100.187 4,000,000.00 1.08 42333HJN3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 OD 04/07/9B 4,007,480.00 1.08 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO NTH .000 5.960 A2 99.796 4,000,000.00 1.08 44181KZA5 FLTG RT 06/24/2003 DD 06/24/98 3,991,840.00 1.07 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR SOOS70 t .ODD 5.751 A2 99.878 999,188.90 .27 94181KZT4 FLTG RT 08/O1/20U1 DO 09/04/98 998,780.00 .27 (LOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 ICSF07522202 1990/09/30 RUN DATE 10/02/96 ]RANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 13.03.50 PAR VALUE TIM At CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY TO SECURITY DISCRTrT10M BON( YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ---'"-- -----. -------- ------------ ---------- 7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST OEM VITTER $R MOTES .006 5.675 Al 100.171 7,003,710.00 1.90 61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/0000 DO EL23/08 7,011,970.00 1.88 5,000,000.00 STUDENT LN MID "" 98-2 AT .000 5.828 AAA 99.913 5,000,000.00 1.35 78442GBA3 FLTG RT 04/25/2EQ DO 66/18/M 4,995,650.00 1.34 10,300,300.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX W 3.731 3.426 AAA 98.500 10,021,110.47 2.75 9128272M3 3.3752 01/IS/2E07 DO ll/1S/97 10,145,795.50 2.73 7,237,207.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.740 3.610 AAA 100.406 7,201,026.68 1.97 9128273A8 3.6257. 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 7,266,590.06 1.95 43,300,000.DO V S TREASURY NOTES 4.901 6.741 AAA 101.984 44,009,210.70 11.97 912827RZO 06.8752 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 44,159,072.00 11.87 13,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.436 6.412 AAA 116.969 14,559,266.30 4.12 912827SB6 07.5007. 02/15/2005 OD 02/15/95 15,205,970.00 4.09 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.553 5.859 AM 106.672 2,566,119.73 .72 9128273G5 D6.2502 08/51/2002 DO 09/02/97 2,666,800.00 .72 21,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.569 6.043 AAA 105.500 22,010,625.00 6.15 912827254 06.375% 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 22,682,500.00 6.09 27,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.594 6.882 AAA 308.984 29,235,206.21 8.09 912827D25 07.500Y. 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 29,861,616.00 8.02 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.617 8.883 AAA 133.687 61698,250.00 1.88 9126100G0 11.875% 11/15/2003 D0 10/05/83 6,951,724.00 1.87 1,500,OD0.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 5.650 6.237 AA3 104.219 1,543,215.00 .42 046003HYS 6.500% 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 1,563,285.00 .42 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 5.760 5.621 A3 102.302 999,730.00 .27 42333WJ0 5.750% 09/25/2001 OD 09/25/98 1,023,020.00 .27 25,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.783 6.067 AAA 107.141 25,746,998.49 7.26 9128272N1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 26,785,250.00 7.20 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.168 AAA 107.406 3,613,203.13 1.01 9128272SO 06.6252 04/30/2002 OD 04/30/97 3,759,210.00 1.01 S,RRD,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 5.899 AAA 105.953 5,086,402.25 1.43 9128272LS 06.2502 02/28/2002 DO 02/28/97 5,297,650.00 1.42 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS- PAGE 7 5 OCSF07522202 1998/09/30 RUN DATE : 10/02/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 13.03.58 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION 600M! YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL IATL RIG ASSN NTM 5.871 5.611 AAA 101.187 5,000,781.25 1.37 31364FFM8 5.880% 11/03/1999 00 11/85/97 5,059,350.00 1.36 6,000,000.00 NATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C MTN 5.882 5.823 AA1 100.468 5,996,400.00 1.63 63858JDE6 5.850% 04/07/2000 DO 04/07/98 6,028,080.00 1.62 1,261,955.85 FNLMC MULTICL MIG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.860 100.687 1,260,181.22 .34 3133T0"S 5.900X D6/15/2017 1,270,62 .49 .34 2,234,747.81 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-6 CL A 5.957 5.879 AAA IDO.354 2,230,121.29 .60 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 2,242,658.82 .60 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.195 AA3 102.905 2,526,725.00 .69 59018SKP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 2,572,625.00 .69 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO MR FNLMC GOLD SF 6.006 6.000 AAA 100.000 4,709,921.88 1.28 02R0606AS 6.000X 10/15/2028 4,750,000.00 1.28 7,50D,000.OD BELLSOUTM TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6.010 5.672 AAA 102.182 7,497,255.00 2.07 079867AXS 6.000% 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/98 7,663,650.00 2.06 1.250,000.00 GENERAL MRRS ACCEP CORP NTS 6.032 6.794 A2 104.879 1,283,662.50 .35 370425GF0 7.125X OS/01/2002 00 OS/D1/97 1,310,987.50 .35 1,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP HIM 6.046 6.486 A2 103.296 1,018,520.00 .29 37042RGK1 6.700% 04/30/2001 DO 04/25/96 1,032,960.00 .28 917,772.90 FNMA POOL /0313371 6.096 6.079 AAA 301.125 924,369.39 .25 31374GCG0 6.1477. 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 928,097.85 .25 215,373.37 FNMA POOL 80313769 6.102 6.083 AAA 101.125 226,921.36 .05 31374GGN0 6.1517.. 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 217,796.32 .06 629,050.17 FNMA POOL 80339016 6.104 6.085 MA 101.125 633,551.32 .17 31375M5D6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 636,106.76 .17 803,462.20 FNMA POOL 50313783 6.108 6.089 AAA 101.125 809,237.16 .22 31374GRC3 6.157% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 812,501.23 .22 889,216.31 FNMA POOL /0313600 6.144 6.075 AAA 101.125 895,607.54 .24 31374GMM8 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 899,219.99 .24 411,539.49 FNMA POOL 80258575 6.149 6.098 AAA 101.125 414,497.44 .11 3137006L8 6.167X 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 416,169.31 .11 YLOAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 6 OCSF07522202 1998/09/30 RUN DATE : 10/02/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.03.58 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY OESCRIPTIM BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.162 8.621 AAA 129.047 6,233,593.75 1.75 912610DES 11.1257. 03/15/2163 DO 07/65/63 6.452.350.00 1.73 313.323.88 FIFTH THIRD 8X AUTO TV 9" CLA 6.200 6.159 AAA 100.662 313.323.87 .08 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2691 DO 93/15/96 315,396.77 .08 193,132.46 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EO 96.4 A3 6.213 6.151 AAA 100.633 192,717.53 .09 21075M S 6.190X 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 194.354.24 .05 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 6.225 6.073 A2 102.083 2,997,730.00 .SS 075902BJ6 6.200X OU30/2005 OD 03/30/98 2,041,660.00 .SS 13,000,000.08 COMMIT TO PUB GNHA SF RTC 6.228 6.359 AAA 102.218 13.248.203.06 3.60 OIN0626A5 6.500% 10/25/2028 13.200.340.00 3.57 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLOCS NTH TV 00252 6.232 6.426 BAA1 99.599 2,309,175.00 .67 S2527PLMI 6.40OX 08/30/2000 OD 09/26/97 2,489,975.00 .67 4.SGD.ODO.00 FEDERAL NAIL BIG ASSN MTH 6.291 5.954 MA 104.641 4.488.705.00 1.27 31364CXYS 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 4,708,845.00 1.27 4,336,482.56 FHLMC MULTICLASS CIF E3 A 6.326 6.304 AAA 100.316 4.341.225.59 1.17 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2932 4.350.185.84 1.17 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLOOS NTH IOD196 6.364 6.6K BAA1 99.796 5,039,450.00 1.35 52517PJ04 6.650% 11/08/2000 DO 11/08/96 4,989,800.00 1.34 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR HIS 6.425 6.579 A2 102.605 1.317.619.35 .36 073902AN8 6.7507. 03/01/2001 OD 64/26/96 2,338,995.25 .36 2.OD0.000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF III A6 6.496 6.132 AAA 1D5.993 2,000,888.00 .57 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 2,119,860.00 .57 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL BID AWN BIN 6.577 6.301 AAA 105.141 9,0220576.00 2.28 31364COD9 6.426% 04/18/2001 DO 04/18/96 - 8.411.200.00 2.26 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS HT 6.593 8.822 A2 104.850 9,903,780.00 2.55 718154BB2 9.25OX OVIS12000 9.436.SG0.00 2.54 16,589,980.79 FHLMC GROUP NGS-0476 6.628 6.917 AAA 101.194 16,649,199.23 4.55 3128DDR55 7.000X 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 16.788.065.16 4.51 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL BIB AWN NTH 6.636 5.635 AAA 200.094 9,593,750.00 2.71 313648NF3 5.6407. OU20/2001 OR OV20/96 10.009.400.00 2.69 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 7 OCSF07522202 1998/01/50 RUN DATE 10/02/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATING RUN TINE f 13.03.58 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY RARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPII0N 80Q YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL 3,000,000.00 G N A C RED TERN NIS 6.669 8.265 A2 104.352 3,227,070.00 .84 37042MO4 8.6257. 1/10/2099 00 1/10195 3,130,560.00 .84 4,052,193.67 "A II POOL R9R99MR 6.705 6.737 AM 102.047 4,140,835.42 1.12 36225CCZ0 6.8757. 06/21/2427 DO OVIII97 4,135,142.07 1.11 5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO M FRLRC GOLD 6.746 6.819 AM 102.656 5,608,281.26 1.53 02R0706A2 7.D02 10/15/2428 5,646,080.00 1.52 1,545,168.64 GNNA II POOL 40008684 6.865 6.876 AM 101.797 1,571,001.92 .42 36202KUN6 7.0002 00/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 1,572,935.32 .42 2,768,169.25 "A I1 POOL 60080023 6.869 6.891 AM 101.578 2,814,017.07 .76 36225CAZ9 7.000% 1V20/2026 DO 12/O1/96 2,811,850.96 .76 2,500,ODO.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 7.812 AM 169.609 4,029,030.31 1.15 912810OJ 13.250% 05/15/2014 DO OS/15/84 4,240,225.00 1.14 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES 4.328 6.160 362,992,576.50 100.00 368,691,822.08 99.08 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 4.327 6.160 566,472,664.92 100.00 372,171,910.SO 100.00 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN ADMINISTRATOR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN 22-SEP-1998 -20,000,000.00 -20,000,000.00 0.000000 NA9123459 ADMINISTRATOR ----------- -20,000,000.00 0.00 0.000000 CN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 28-SEP-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 31293AB56 FHLMC GROUP 4C1-4560 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 6.5001 09/01/2028 DO 09/01/98 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 28-SEP-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 31293AB56 FHLMC GROUP 4C1-4560 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 6.500% 09/01/2028 DO 09/01/98 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES O8-SEP-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912810DY1 U S TREASURY BONDS ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 08.7501 05/15/2017 DO 05/15/87 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 30-SEP-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827R20 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.8751 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES il-SEP-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827586 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 30-SEP-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827586 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 9-16-98 30-SEP-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1996 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 9128273G5 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CR 06.250% 08/31/2002 DD 09/02/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 08-SEP-1998 -792,920.00 -792,920.00 99.115000 313397N49 MAT 11/06/1998 08-SEP-1998 792,920.00 792,920.00 99.115000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 08-SEP-1998 -792,920.00 -792,920.00 99.115000 313397N49 MAT 11/06/1998 08-SEP-1998 -792,920.00 0.00 99.115000 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 08-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 14-SEP-1998 -2,665,119.00 -2,665,119.00 98.708111 313397577 MAT 12/11/1998 14-SEP-1998 2,665,119.00 2,665,119.00 98.706111 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 14-SEP-1998 -2,665,119.00 -2,665,119.00 98.708111 313397577 MAT 12/11/1998 14-SEP-1998 -2,665,119.00 0.00 98.706111 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 28-SEP-1998 -786,259.78 -786,259.78 98.282472 34539UNT5 01/27/1999 28-SEP-1998 786,259.78 786,259.78 98.282472 B BANK OF IRELAND, LONDON ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 28-SEP-1998 -786,259.78 -786,259.78 98.282472 34539UNT5 01/27/1999 28-SEP-1998 -786,259.78 0.00 98.282472 PC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 28-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 IBM DISC 09-SEP-1998 -883,021.50 -883,021.50 98.113500 44922BND6 01/13/1999 09-SEP-1998 863,021.50 983,021.50 98.113500 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 2 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST 11 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-199B - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 IBM DISC 09-SEP-1998 -883,021.50 -883,021.50 98.113500 44922BNDS 01/13/1999 09-SEP-1998 -883,021.50 0.00 98.113500 FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 09-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 737.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-SEP-1998 -737.67 -737.87 1.000000 996085247 01-SEP-1998 737.87 737.87 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 737.87 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-SEP-1998 -737.87 -737.87 1.000000 996085247 01-SEP-1998 -737.87 0.00 1.000000 PC 01-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 204,991.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-SEP-1998 -204,991.56 -204,991.56 1.000000 996085247 01-SEP-1998 204,991.56 204,991.56 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 204,991.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-SEP-1998 -204,991.56 -204,991.56 1.000000 996085247 01-SEP-1998 -204,991.56 0.00 1.000000 FC 01-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 560,444.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-SEP-1998 -568,444.29 -568,444.29 1.000000 996085247 04-SEP-1998 568,444.29 568,444.29 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 568,444.29 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-SEP-1998 -568,444.29 -568,444.29 1.000000 996085247 04-SEP-1998 -568,444.29 0.00 1.000000 PC 04-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 7,060.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-SEP-1998 -7,080.00 -7,080.00 1.000000 996085247 08-SEP-1998 7,080.00 7,080.00 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 3 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 7,080.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-SEP-1998 -7,080.00 -7,080.00 1.000000 996085247 08-SEP-1998 -7,080.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 08-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 16,978.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-SEP-1998 -16,978.50 -16,978.50 1.000000 996085247 09-SEP-1998 16, 978.50 16,978.50 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 D.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 16,978.50 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 09-SEP-1998 -16,978.50 -16,978.50 1.000000 996085247 09-SEP-1998 -16,978.50 0.00 1.000000 PC 09-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 459,928.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-SEP-1998 -459,928.56 -459,928.56 1.000000 996085247 10-SEP-1998 459,928.56 459,928.56 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 459,928.56 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-SEP-1998 -459,928.56 -459,928.56 1.000000 996085247 10-SEP-1998 -459,928.56 0.00 1.000000 FC 10-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 95,333.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-SEP-1998 -95,333.59 -95,333.59 1.000000 996085247 14-SEP-1998 95,333.59 95,333.59 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 95,333.59 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-SEP-1998 -95,333.59 -95,333.59 1.000000 996085247 14-SEP-1999 -95,333.59 0.00 1.000000 PC 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,039,483.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-SEP-1998 -1,039,483.98 -1,039,483.90 1.000000 996085247 15-SEP-1998 1,039,483.98 1,039,483.98 1.000000 Page 4 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST C$DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,039,483.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 15-SEP-1998 -1,D39,483.98 -1,039,483.98 1.000000 996085247 15-SEP-1998 -1,D39,483.98 0.00 1.000000 PC 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,072,024.54 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-SEP-1998 -3,072,824.54 -3,072,824.54 1.000000 996085247 21-SEP-1998 3,072,824.54 3,072,924.54 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 . 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,072,824.54 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-SEP-1998 -3,072,824.54 -3,072,024.54 1.000000 996095247 21-SEP-1998 -3,072,824.54 0.00 1.000000 FC 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 247,843.08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-SEP-1998 -247,843.OB -247,843.08 1.000000 996085247 22-SEP-1998 247,843.08 247,843.09 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 247,843.08 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 22-SEP-1998 -247,843.08 -247,043.08 1.000000 996085247 22-SEP-1998 -247,643.08 0.00 1.000000 PC 22-SEP-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 60,796.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-SEP-1999 -60,796.66 -60,796.66 1.000000 996085247 24-SEP-1998 60,796.66 60,796.66 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 60,796.66 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 24-SEP-1998 -60,796.66 -60,796.66 1.000000 996085247 24-SEP-1998 -60,796.66 0.00 1.000000 PC 24-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 13,740.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-SEP-1998 -13,740.22 -13,740.22 1.000000 Page 5 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996085247 28-SEP-1998 13,740.22 13,740.22 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 13,740.22 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-SEP-1998 -13,740.22 -13,740.22 1.000000 996085247 28-SEP-1999 -13,740.22 0.00 1.000000 FC 28-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-SEP-1998 -0.01 -0.01 1.000000 996095247 29-SEP-1998 0.01 0.01 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.01 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 29-SEP-1998 -0.01 -0.01 1.0000DD 996085247 29-SEP-1998 -0.01 0.00 1.000DDO PC 29-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.D00000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 841,544.77 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-SEP-1998 -841,544.77 -841,544.77 1.000000 996085247 30-SEP-1998 941,544.77 841,544.77 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 841,544.77 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 30-SEP-1998 -841,544.77 -841,544.77 1.000000 996085247 30-SEP-1998 -841,544.77 0.00 1.000000 FC 30-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 01-SEP-1998 -8,721,132.77 -8,721,132.77 102.601562 01NO626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 8,721,132.77 8,721,132.77 102.601562 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR GNMA SF MTG 01-SEP-1998 -4,527,070.29 -4,527,070.29 100.601562 01NO626A5 6.500% 10/15/2028 21-OCT-1998 4,527,070.29 4,527,070.29 100.601562 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 -.----- Page 6 , OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST .. CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 -4,709,921.00 -4,709,921.88 99.156250 02RO606A3 6.000% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1998 4,709,921.88 4,709,921.88 99.156250 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 11-AUG-1998 -4,645,351.56 -4,645,351.56 97.796875 02R060696 6.000% 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 -4,645,351.56 0.00 97.796875 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PURCHASE FHLMC GOLD 04-AUG-1998 5,487,968.75 5,487,968.75 99.781250 02R062692 6.50% 9/15/2028 14-SEP-1958 -5,487,968.75 -5,487,968.75 99.781250 BC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES 6 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1999 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2028 14-OCT-1999 2,804,140.63 2,804,140.63 101.960750 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-SEP-1998 -2,804,140.63 -2,804,140.63 101.968750 02R0706A2 7.00% 10/15/2029 14-OCT-1998 2,804,140.63 2,804,140.63 101.968750 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 03-AUG-1998 -2,792,109.37 -2,792,109.37 101.531250 02R070695 7.000% 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1996 -2,792,109.37 0.00 101.531250 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-SEP-199S 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 11-SEP-1998 -1,543,215.00 -1,543,215.00 102.881000 046003HYS 6.500% 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 16-SEP-1998 1,543,215.00 1,543,215.00 102.981000 B PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 11-SEP-1998 -16,520.84 -16,520.84 102.881000 046003NY8 6.500% 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 16-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 102.881000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 7 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1990 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP N A SR NTS 11-SEP-1998 -1,559,735.84 -1,559,735.84 102.881000 046003HYS 6.500% 07/15/2002 DO 07/11/97 16-SEP-1998 -1,559,735.84 0.00 102.881000 FC PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INC 16-SEP-1998 0.00 O.DO 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 26-AUG-1998 497,925.00 497,925.00 99.585000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 31-AUG-1998 -497,925.00 -497,925.00 99.585000 BC BHF SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.ODD000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 26-AUG-1998 12,916.67 12,916.67 99.585000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 99.585000 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 26-AUG-1998 510,841.67 510,841.67 99.585000 073902BJ6 6.2001 03/30/2003 DD 03/30/98 31-AUG-1998 510,841.67 0.00 99.585000 FCC BHF SECURITIES, NEW YORK 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 BEAR STEARNS 00 UNSUB 26-AUG-1998 -497,925.00 -497,925.00 99.585000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 31-AUG-1998 497,925.00 497,925.00 99.585000 B BHF SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 26-AUG-1998 -12,916.67 -12,916.67 99.585000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 99.585000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 26-AUG-1998 -510,841.67 -520,841.67 99.585000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 31-AUG-1998 -510,841.67 0.00 99.585000 FC BANK OF NY BARCLAYS DE EOETE W 02-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C1-4560 04-AUG-1998 -493,917.19 -493,917.19 99.781250 31293AB56 6.500% 09/01/2028 OD 09/01/98 14-SEP-1998 493,917.19 493,917.19 99.781250 B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES 6 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 8 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /C1-4560 04-AUG-1998 -1,161.88 -1,161.88 99.781250 31293AB56 6.500% 09/01/2028 DD 09/01/98 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 99.781250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /C1-4560 04-AUG-1998 -495,079.07 -495,079.07 99.781250 31293AB56 6.500% 09/01/2028 DD 09/01/98 14-SEP-1998 -495,079.07 0.00 99.781250 PC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES 6 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,950,000.00 FHLMC GROUP ICI-4560 04-AUG-1998 -4,939,171.88 -4,939,171.88 99.781250 31293AB56 6.500% 09/01/2028 DO 09/01/98 14-SEP-1998 4,939,171.88 4,939,171.88 99.781250 B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES 6 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,950,000.00 FHLMC GROUP /C1-4560 04-AUG-1998 -11,618.75 -11,618.75 99.781250 31293AB56 6.500% 09/01/2028 DO 09/01/98 14-SEP-1999 0.00 0.00 99.781250 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,950,000.00 FHLMC GROUP ICI-4560 04-AUG-1998 -4,950,790.63 -4,950,790.63 99.781250 31293AB56 6.500% 09/01/2028 DO 09/01/98 14-SEP-1998 -4,950,790.63 0.00 99.781250 PC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES 6 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,7D0,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS - 28-AUG-1998 -3,680,213.22 -3,680,213.22 99.208000 370425QV5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 02-SEP-1998 -3,680,213.22 0.00 99.208000 PC CHEMICAL SK/BROKER 4 DEALER, N 02-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 28-AUG-1998 -248,715.56 -249,715.56 99.229000 370425QV5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 DO 09/17/98 02-SEP-1998 -248,715.56 0.00 99.229000 PC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 02-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 22-SEP-1998 -999,730.00 -999,730.00 99.973000 42333HKJO 5.750% 09/25/2001 DD 09/25/98 25-SEP-1998 999,730.00 999,730.00 99.973000 Page 9 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 22-SEP-1998 -999,730.00 -999,730.00 99.973000 42333HKJO 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 25-SEP-1998 -999,730.00 0.00 99.973000 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 22-SEP-1998 -999,730.00 -999,730.00 99.973000 42333HKJO 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 25-SEP-1998 999,730.00 999,730.00 99.973000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HELLER FINANCIAL INC NTS 22-SEP-1998 -999,730.00 -999,730.00 99.973000 42333HKJO 5.750% 09/25/2001 DO 09/25/98 25-SEP-1998 -999,730.00 0.00 99.973000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 28-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 400570 01-SEP-1998 -999,188.90 -999,188.90 99.918890 44181KZT4 FLTG AT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 04-SEP-1998 999, 188.90 999,188.90 99.91889D B CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN MTN SR 400570 01-SEP-1998 -999,188.90 -999,188.90 99.918890 44181KZT4 FLTG AT 08/01/2001 DO 09/04/98 04-SEP-1998 -999,188.90 0.00 99.918890 PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 04-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00252 04-SEP-1998 -3,011,010.00 -3,011,010.00 100.367000 52517PLMI 6.400% OB/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 10-SEP-1998 3,011,010.00 3,011,010.00 300.367000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00252 04-SEP-1998 -13,333.33 -13,333.33 100.367000 52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 10-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 100.367000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00252 04-SEP-1998 3,011,010.00 3,011,010.00 100.367000 _ . ...._.-_ Page 10 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 10-SEP-1998 -3,021,010.00 -3,011,010.00 100.367000 BC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00252 04-SEP-1998 13,333.33 13,333.33 100.367000 52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 10-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 100.367000 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00252 04-SEP-1998 -2,509,175.00 -2,509,175.00 100.367000 52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DO 09/26/97 10-SEP-199B 2,509,175.00 2,509,175.00 100.367000 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00252 04-SEP-1998 -11,111.11 -11,111.11 100.367000 52517PLMI 6.400% 00/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 10-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 100.367000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN TR 00252 04-SEP-1990 -2,520,286.12 -2,520,296.11 100.367000 52517PLM1 6.400% 08/30/2000 DD 09/26/97 10-SEP-1998 -2,520,286.11 0.00 100.367000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 10-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-AUG-1998 -17,595,959.63 -17,595,959.63 106.049100 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 18-SEP-1998 -17,595,959.63 0.00 106.049100 FC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 18-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-SEP-1998 -17,044,708.20 -17,044,700.20 107.877900 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 23-OCT-1998 17,044,700.20 17,044,708.20 107.877900 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-SEP-1998 -518,437.50 -518,437.50 107.877900 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 23-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 107.877900 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Pegs 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1998 -44,044,266.00 -44,044,266.00 101.396000 91282IR20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 17-SEP-1998 -44,044,266.00 0.00 101.396000 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 -44,009,210.70 -44,009,210.70 101.637900 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 20-OCT-1998 44,009,210.70 44,009,210.70 101.637900 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 -411,170.58 -411,170.58 101.637900 912827R20 06.975% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 20-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 101.637900 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1998 -6,691,563.26 -6,691,563.26 110.853500 912927S86 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 17-SEP-1998 -6,691,563.26 0.00 110.853500 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-AUG-1998 -1,582,171.56 -1,582,171.56 112.339700 912827S86 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 17-SEP-1998 -1,582,171.56 0.00 112.339700 PC BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-SEP-1998 -565,901.50 -565,901.50 113.180300 912827S86 07.5001 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 09-OCT-1998 565,901.50 565,901.50 113.180300 B HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-SEP-1998 -5,604.62 -5,604.62 113.180300 912827S86 07.500► 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 09-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 113.180300 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-SEP-1998 -2,963,901.20 -2,963,901.20 113.996200 912827S86 07.500% 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 16-OCT-1998 2,963,901.20 2,963,901.20 113.996200 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 12 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST .. , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-SEP-1998 -32,853.26 -32,853.26 113.996200 912827S86 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 113.996200 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 -2,629,032.90 -2,628,032.90 114.262300 912827S86 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 16-OCT-1998 2,628,032.90 2,628,032.90 114.262300 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 -29,062.51 -29,062.51 114.262300 912827S86 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 16-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 114.262300 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,444,904.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-AUG-1998 -2,439,301.38 -2,439,301.38 99.101008 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 -2,439,301.38 0.00 99.101008 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOS70N CDR 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,448,048.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 -2,444,079.79 -2,444,079.79 99.837903 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 26-OCT-1998 2,444,079.79 2,444,079.79 99.837903 B BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,448,048.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 -24,838.04 -24,838.04 99.837903 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 26-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 99.837903 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-SEP-1998 -1,051,552.00 -1,051,552.00 105.155200 9128273G5 06.250% 08/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 14-OCT-1998 1,051,552.00 1,051,552.00 105.155200 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-SEP-1998 -7,596.69 -7,596.69 105.155200 9128273G5 06.250% 09/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 14-OCT-1998 0.00 0.00 105.155200 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 13 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,876.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -8,876.00 -8,876.00 100.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 8,076.00 8,876.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,876.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -8,876.00 -8,876.00 100.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -8,876.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 02-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -59,141.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-SEP-1998 59,141.43 59,141.43 1.000000 996085247 02-SEP-1998 -59,141.43 -59,141.43 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 l.DDDDDDDDO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -59,141.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 02-SEP-1998 59,141.43 59,141.43 1.000000 996085247 02-SEP-1998 59,141.43 0.00 1.000000 PC 02-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -849,441.90 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-SEP-1998 849,441.90 849,441.90 1.000000 996085247 08-SEP-1998 -849,441.90 -849,441.90 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -849,441.90 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 08-SEP-1998 849,441.90 849,441.90 1.000000 996085247 OB-SEP-1998 849,441.90 0.00 1.000000 PC O8-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT II-SEP-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 11-SEP-1998 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 s - 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 14 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-SEP-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 11-SEP-1998 3.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 11-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -65,119.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-SEP-1998 65,119.00 65,119.00 1.000000 996085247 14-SEP-1998 -65,119.00 -65,119.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -65,119.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-SEP-1998 65,119.00 65,129.00 1.000000 996085247 14-SEP-1998 65,119.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -277,614.37 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-SEP-1998 277,614.37 277,614.37 1.000000 996085247 16-SEP-1998 -277,624.37 -277,614.37 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -277,614.37 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 16-SEP-1998 277,614.37 277,614.37 1.000000 996085247 16-SEP-1999 277,614.37 0.00 1.000000 FC 16-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -465,926.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-SEP-1998 465,926.43 465,926.43 1.000000 996085247 17-SEP-1998 -465,926.43 -465,926.43 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -465,926.43 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-SEP-1998 465,926.43 465,926.43 1.000000 996085247 17-SEP-1998 465,926.43 0.00 1.000000 FC 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -126,225.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-SEP-1998 126,225.93 126,225.93 1.000000 996085247 18-SEP-1998 -126,225.93 -126,225.93 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -126,225.93 DREYFUS TREASURY CASK MGMT 18-SEP-1998 126,225.93 126,225.93 1.000000 996095247 18-SEP-1998 126,225.93 0.00 1.000000 PC 18-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -878,770.07 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGNT 25-SEP-1998 878,770.07 878,770.07 1.000000 996085247 25-SEP-1998 -878,770.07 -878,770.07 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -878,770.07 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-SEP-1998 878,770.07 878,770.07 1.000000 996085247 25-SEP-1998 878,770.07 0.00 1.000000 PC 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -999,736.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-SEP-1998 999,736.00 999,736.00 1.000000 996085247 28-SEP-1998 -999,736.00 -999,736.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -999,736.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-SEP-1998 999,736.00 999,736.00 1.000000 996085247 28-SEP-1998 999,736.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 28-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 4,711,406.25 4,711,406.25 99.187500 02R060696 6.000% 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 -4,645,351.56 -4,645,351.56 99.187500 S MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 66,054.69 66,054.69 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 4,711,406.25 4,711,406.25 99.187500 02R060696 6.000% 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 4,711,406.25 0.00 99.187500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PURCHASE FHLMC GOLD 11-AUG-1998 -5,503,437.50 -5,503,437.50 100.062500 02R062692 6.50% 9/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 5,487,968.75 5,487,968.75 100.062500 Page 16 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ SC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -15,468.75 -15,468.75 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 2,806,074.21 2,606,074.21 102.039062 02RO70695 7.000% 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 -2,792,109.37 -2,792,109.37 102.039062 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 13,964.84 13,964.84 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 2,806,074.21 2,806,074.21 102.039062 02RO70695 7.000% 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 2,806,074.21 0.00 102.039062 PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 -2,806,074.21 -2,806,074.21 102.039062 02RO70695 7.000% 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 2,792,109.37 2,792,109.37 102.039062 SC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- -13,964.84 -13,964.94 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1999 -2,906,074.21 -2,806,074.21 102.039062 02RO70695 7.000% 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 -2,806,074.21 0.00 102.039062 FCC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-SEP-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1998 2,806,074.20 2,806,074.20 102.039062 02RO70695 7.0001 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 -2,792,109.37 -2,792,109.37 102.039062 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 13,964.83 13,964.83 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 09-SEP-1996 2,806,074.20 2,806,074.20 102.039062 02RO70695 7.000% 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 2,806,074.20 0.00 102.039062 PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP IC1-4560 11-AUG-1998 495,309.38 495,309.38 100.062500 31293AB56 6.5009 09/01/2028 DO 09/01/98 14-SEP-1998 -493,917.19 -493,917.19 100.062500 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 1,392.19 1,392.19 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP OCI-4560 11-AUG-1996 1,161.88 11161.66 100.062500 Page 17 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31293AB56 6.500% 09/01/2028 DD 09/O1/98 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 100.062500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -495,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C1-4560 11-AUG-1998 496,471.26 496,471.26 100.062500 31293AB56 6.500% 09/01/2028 DO 09/01/98 14-SEP-1998 496,411.26 0.00 100.062500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,950,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C1-4560 11-AUG-1998 4,953,093.75 4,953,093.75 100.062500 31293AB56 6.500% 09/01/2028 DD 09/01/98 14-SEP-1998 -4,939,171.88 -4,939,111.88 100.062500 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 13,921.87 13,921.87 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,950,000.00 FHLMC GROUP BC1-4560 11-AUG-1998 11,619.75 11,618.75 100.062500 31293AB56 6.500% 09/01/2028 DO 09/01/98 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 100.062500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,950,000.00 FHLMC GROUP 4C1-4560 11-AUG-1998 4,964,712.50 4,964,712.50 100.062500 31293AB56 6.5001 09/01/2028 DO 09/01/98 14-SEP-1998 4,964,712.50 0.00 100.062500 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN TR00324 28-AUG-1998 3,869,787.35 3,869,787.35 101.076000 37042RPM8 8.375% 02/03/1999 DO 0/03/95 02-SEP-1998 3,869,787.35 0.00 101.076000 PC CHEMICAL BK/BROKER 6 DEALER, N 02-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-SEP-1998 17,064,000.00 17,064,000.00 108.000000 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 18-SEP-1998 -16,858,251.59 -16,858,257.59 108.000000 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 205,742.41 205,742.41 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-SEP-1998 405,733.70 405,733.70 108.000000 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 18-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 108.000000 LS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 18 „ OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -15,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-SEP-1999 17,469,733.70 17,469,733.70 108.000000 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 18-SEP-1998 17,469,733.70 0.00 108.000000 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 18-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 44,057,750.00 44,057,750.00 101.750000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 17-SEP-1998 -43,904,468.00 -43,904,468.00 101.750000 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 153,282.00 153,282.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 139,798.00 139,798.00 101.750000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 17-SEP-1999 0.00 0.00 101.750000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 44,197,548.00 44,197,548.00 101.750000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 17-SEP-1998 44,197,548.00 0.00 101.750000 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-SEP-1998 566,406.25 566,406.25 113.281250 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 04-SEP-1998 -555,429.30 -555,429.30 113.281250 S HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 10,976.95 10,976.95 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-SEP-1998 2,038.04 2,039.04 113.281250 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 04-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 113.281250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.00OODD000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-SEP-1998 568,444.29 569,444.29 113.281250 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 04-SEP-1998 569,444.29 0.00 113.281250 FC HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK 04-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-SEP-1999 2,966,437.50 2,966,437.50 114.093750 912827SSS 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 10-SEP-1998 -2,889,934.12 -2,889,934.12 114.093750 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 76,503.38 76,503.38 1.000000000 0.00 Page 19 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-SEP-1998 13,777.17 13,777.17 114.093750 912827586 07.5001 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 10-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 114.093750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-SEP-1998 2,980,214.67 2,980,214.67 114.093750 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 10-SEP-1998 2,980,214.67 0.00 114.093750 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CUR 10-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 2,629,906.25 2,629,906.25 114.343750 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 17-SEP-1998 -2,567,112.95 -2,567,112.95 114.343750 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 62,793.30 62,793.30 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 15,468.75 15,468.75 114.343750 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 114.343750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-SEP-1998 2,645,375.00 2,645,375.00 114.343750 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 17-SEP-1998 2,645,375.00 0.00 114.343750 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 17-SEP-2998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 21-SEP-1998 3,485,859.38 3,485,859.38 116.195312 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 22-SEP-1998 -3,359,830.68 -3,359,830.68 116.195312 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 126,028.70 126,028.70 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 21-SEP-1998 23,233.70 23,233.70 116.195312 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 22-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 116.195312 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-SEP-1998 3,509,093.08 3,509,093.08 116.195312 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 22-SEP-1999 3,509,093.08 0.00 116.195312 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 22-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 20 „ OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 21-SEP-1999 16,376,250.00 16,376,250.00 102.351562 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 22-SEP-1998 -16,030,100.89 -16,030,100.89 102.351562 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 346,149.11 346,149.11 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 21-SEP-1990 362,500.00 362,500.00 102.351562 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 22-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 102.351562 is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,000,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 21-SEP-1998 16,738,750.00 16,738,750.00 102.351562 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 22-SEP-1998 16,738,750.00 0.00 102.351562 _ FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 22-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 2,439,292.35 2,439,292.35 99.781250 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 -2,432,405.68 -2,432,405.68 99.781250 S BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 6,886.67 6,886.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 16,375.10 16,375.10 99.781250 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1999 0.00 0.00 99.781250 is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 2,455,667.45 2,455,667.45 99.791250 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 2,455,667.45 0.00 99.781250 PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 10-SEP-1998 2,439,292.35 2,439,292.35 99.781250 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 -2,432,405.68 -2,432,405.68 99.791250 S BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 6,886.67 6,886.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1998 16,375.10 16,375.10 99.781250 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 99.781250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 21 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,444,640.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 18-SEP-1999 2,455,667.45 2,455,667.45 99.781250 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 2,455,667.45 0.00 99.781250 PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-SEP-1998 1,051,875.00 1,051,875.00 105.187500 9128273G5 06.250% O0/31/2002 DO 09/02/97 16-SEP-1998 -1,026,447.89 -1,026,447.89 105.187500 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 25,427.11 25,427.11 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 15-SEP-1998 2,762.44 2,762.44 105.187500 9128273G5 06.250% 08/31/2002 DD 09/02/97 16-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 105.187500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-SEP-1998 1,054,637.44 1,054,637.44 105.107500 9128273G5 06.250% 08/31/2002 DD 09/02/97 16-SEP-1998 1,054,637.44 0.00 105.187500 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB 16-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -199,767.55 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-SEP-1998 199,767.55 199,767.55 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-SEP-1998 -199,353.97 -199,353.97 1D0.000000 PD ----------- 413.58 413.58 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -199,767.55 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-SEP-1998 199,767.55 199,767.55 100.000DDD 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-SEP-1998 199,767.55 0.00 100.000DDD PC 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.00OOODOD0 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -306,843.60 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME SO 96-4 A3 01-SEP-1998 306,843.60 306,843.60 100.000000 21075NDKS 6.1901 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-SEP-1998 -306,184.37 -306,184.37 100.000000 PD ----------- 659.23 659.23 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 22 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -306,843.60 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-SEP-1998 306,843.60 306,843.60 100.000000 21075NDKO 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-SEP-1998 306,843.60 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -435,461.52 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-SEP-1998 435,461.52 435,461.52 100.000000 312ODD055 7.0001 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-SEP-1998 -442,265.61 -442,265.61 100.000000 PD ----------- -6,804.09 -6,804.09 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -435,461.52 FHLMC GROUP IG5-0476 01-SEP-1998 435,461.52 435,461.52 100.000000 312ODD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-SEP-1998 435,461.52 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-SEP-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 92,961.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-AUG-1998 -92,961.00 -92,961.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-AUG-1998 93,062.68 93,062.68 100.000000 PDC ----------- 101.68 101.68 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -92,961.19 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 01-AUG-1998 92,961.19 92,961.19 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% O9/15/2032 01-AUG-1998 -93,062.87 -93,062.87 100.000000 PD ----------- -101.68 -101.68 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PINCO -92,961.19 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-AUG-1998 92,961.19 92,961.19 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 00/15/2032 01-AUG-1998 92,961.19 0.00 100.000000 FC 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -117,422.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-SEP-1998 117,422.00 117,422.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-SEP-1998 -117,550.43 -117,550.43 100.000000 PD ----------- -128.43 -128.43 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,404.50 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-SEP-1998 47,404.50 47,404.50 100.000000 3133TO2D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-SEP-1998 -47,337.94 -47,337.84 100.000000 PD ----------- 66.66 66.66 1.000000000 0.00 Page 23 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,404.50 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-SEP-1998 47,404.50 47,404.50 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-SEP-1998 47,404.50 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,016.54 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-SEP-1998 14,016.54 14,016.54 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% O9/01/2028 DD 09/01/88 01-SEP-1998 -14,117.28 -14,117.28 100.000000 PD ----------- -100.74 -100.74 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,016.54 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-SEP-1998 14,016.54 14,016.54 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-SEP-1998 14,016.54 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,134.00 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-SEP-1998 5,134.00 5,134.00 100.000000 3137006L8 6.167% 03/01/2033 DD 09/01/93 01-SEP-1998 -5,170.90 -5,170.90 100.000000 PD ----------- -36.90 -36.90 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5, 134.00 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-SEP-1998 5,134.00 5,134.00 100.000000 31370Q6LB 6.1671 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-SEP-1998 5,134.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,726.43 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-SEP-1998 17,726.43 17,726.43 100,000000 31374GCGO 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -17,853.84 -17,853.84 100.000000 PD ----------- -127.41 -127.41 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,726.43 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-SEP-1998 -17,726.43 -17,726.43 100.000000 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 01-SEP-1998 17,853.84 17,853.84 100.000000 PDC ----------- 127.41 127.41 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,726.42 FNMA POOL /0313371 01-SEP-1998 17,726.42 17,726.42 100.000000 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -17,853.83 -17,853.83 100.000000 PD ----------- -127.41 -127.41 1.000000000 0.00 Page 24 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,726.42 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-SEP-1998 17,726.42 17,726.42 100.000000 31374GCGO 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-SEP-1998 17,726.42 O.OD 1DO.000000 PC 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,328.90 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-SEP-1999 16,328.90 16,328.90 100.000000 31374GKMB 6.160% 05/01/2036 DD 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -16,446.26 -16,446.26 100.000000 PD ----------- -117.36 -117.36 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,328.90 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-SEP-1998 -16,328.90 -16,328.90 100.000000 31374GKMB 6.160% 05/01/2036 DD 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 16,446.26 16,446.26 100.000000 PDC ----------- 117.36 117.36 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,328.90 FMMA POOL /0313600 01-SEP-1996 16,328.90 16,328.90 100.000000 31374GKMB 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -16,446.26 -16,446.26 100.000000 PD ----------- -117.36 -117.36 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,328.90 FMMA POOL #0313600 01-SEP-1998 -16,328.90 -16,328.90 100.000000 31374GKM8 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-SEP-1996 16,446.26 16,446.26 100.000000 PDC ----------- 117.36 117.36 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,328.90 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-SEP-1998 16,328.90 16,328.90 100.000000 31374GKM8 6.160► 05/01/2036 DD 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -16,446.26 -16,446.26 100.000000 PD ----------- -117.36 -117.36 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,328.90 FNKA POOL #0313600 01-SEP-1998 -16,320.90 -26,328.90 100.000000 31374GKMO 6.1601 05/01/2036 DD 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 16,446.26 26,446.26 100.000000 PDC ----------- 117.36 117.36 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,332.14 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-SEP-1998 16,332.14 16,332.14 100.000000 31374GKMO 6.160► 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -16,449.53 -16,449.53 100.000000 PD ----------- -117.39 -117.39 1.000000000 Page 25 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ EASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,332.14 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-SEP-1998 -16,332.14 -16,332.14 100.000000 31374GKMB 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 16,449.53 16,449.53 100.000000 PDC ----------- 117.39 117.39 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,332.13 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-SEP-1999 16,332.13 16,332.13 100.000000 31374GKMB 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -16,449.52 -16,449.52 100.000000 PD ----------- -117.39 -117.39 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,332.13 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-SEP-1998 16,332.13 16,332.13 100.000000 31374GKMO 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-SEP-1998 16,332.13 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,534.37 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-SEP-1998 4,534.37 4,534.37 100.000000 31374GOW0 6.151% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -4,566.96 -4,566.96 100,000000 PD ----------- -32.59 -32.59 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,534.37 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-SEP-1998 -4,534.37 -4,534.37 100.000000 31374GOND 6.151% 05/01/2036 DD 09/01/97 01-SEP-1998 4,566.96 4,566.96 100.000000 PDC ----------- 32.59 32.59 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,536.99 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-SEP-1998 4,536.99 4,536.99 100.000000 31374GON0 6.1511 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -4,569.60 -4,569.60 100.000000 PD ----------- -32.61 -32.61 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,536.99 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-SEP-1998 4,536.99 4,536.99 100.000000 31374GON0 6.151% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-SEP-1998 4,536.99 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,073.00 FNMA POOL #0313783 01-SEP-1998 19,073.00 19,073.00 200.000000 31374GRC3 6.157% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-SEP-2998 -19,210.09 -19,210.09 100.000000 Page 26 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PO ----------- -137.09 -137.09 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,073.00 FNMA POOL #0313783 01-SEP-1998 -19,073.00 -19,073.00 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.1571 05/01/2036 DD 10/01/97 01-SEP-1998 19,210.09 19,210.09 100.000000 PDC ----------- 137.09 137.09 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,090.06 FNMA POOL #0313783 01-SEP-1998 19,090.06 19,090.06 200.000000 31374GRC3 6.157% 05/01/2036 DD 10/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -19,227.27 -19,227.27 100.000000 PD ----------- -137.21 -137.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,090.06 FNMA POOL #0313783 01-SEP-1998 19,090.06 19,090.06 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.157% 05/01/2036 DD 10/01/97 01-SEP-1998 19,090.06 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-SEP-2998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,701.84 FNMA POOL 40339016 01-SEP-1998 10,701.84 10,701.84 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-SEP-1998 -10,778.76 -10,778.76 100.000000 PD ----------- -76.92 -76.92 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,701.84 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-SEP-1998 -10,701.84 -10,701.94 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 02-SEP-1998 10,778.76 10,778.76 100.000000 PDC ----------- 76.92 76.92 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,703.43 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-SEP-1998 10,703.43 10,703.43 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DD 03/01/96 01-SEP-1998 -10,780.36 -10,780.36 100.000000 PD ----------- -76.93 -76.93 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,703.43 FNMA POOL 00339016 01-SEP-1998 10,703.43 10,703.43 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.1531 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-SEP-1990 10,703.43 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-SEP-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,767.35 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-SEP-1990 22,767.35 22,767.35 100.000000 Pago 27 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-SEP-1998 -22,767.35 -22,767.35 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,767.35 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-SEP-1998 22,767.35 22,767.35 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-SEP-1998 22,767.35 0.00 100.000000 PC 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -69,777.04 GNMA II POOL #0008684 01-SEP-1998 69,777.04 69,777.04 100.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 01-SEP-1998 -70,943.62 -70,943.62 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,166.58 -1,166.58 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 69,777.04 GNMA II POOL #0009684 01-SEP-1998 -69,777.04 -69,777.04 100.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 01-SEP-1998 70t943.62 70,943.62 100.000000 PDC ----------- 1,166.58 1,166.58 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -70,131.16 GNMA II POOL #0008684 OS-SEP-1998 70,131.16 70,131.16 100.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 01-SEP-1998 -71,303.67 -71,303.67 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,172.51 -1,172.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -70,131.16 GNMA II POOL 00008684 01-SEP-1998 70,131.16 70,131.16 100.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO O8/01/95 01-SEP-1998 70,131.16 0.00 100.000000 PC 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -144,234.65 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-SEP-1998 144,234.65 144,234.65 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-SEP-1998 -146,623.54 -146,623.54 200.000000 PD ----------- -2,388.89 -2,388.89 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 144,234.65 GNMA II POOL 90080023 01-SEP-1998 -144,234.65 -144,234.65 100.00D000 36225CAZ9 7.0008 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-SEP-1998 146,623.54 146,623.54 100.000000 PDC ----------- 2,388.89 2,388.89 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 28 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE KEATS/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -144,224.25 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-SEP-1998 144,224.25 144,224.25 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-SEP-1998 -146,612.96 -146,612.96 100.000000 PD ----------- -2,388.71 -2,388.11 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -144,224.25 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-SEP-1998 144,224.25 144,224.25 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-SEP-1998 144,224.25 0.00 100.000000 FC 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -334,865.91 GNMA II POOL 0080088H O1-SEP-1998 334,865.91 334,865.91 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-SEP-1998 -342,191.10 -342,191.10 100.000000 PD ----------- -7,325.19 -7,325.19 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIHCO 334,865.91 GNMA II POOL 0080088M O1-SEP-1998 -334,865.91 -334,865.91 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DO O6/01/97 01-SEP-1998 342,191.10 342,191.10 100.000000 PDC ----------- 7,325.19 7,325.19 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -334,869.74 GNMA II POOL 4080089M O1-SEP-1998 334,889.74 334,809.74 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/91 01-SEP-1998 -342,215.45 -342,215.45 100.000000 PD ----------- -7,325.71 -7,325.71 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -334,889.74 GNHA II POOL 4080088M O1-SEP-1998 334,889.74 334,889.74 100.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 334,889.74 0.00 100.000000 PC 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 08-SEP-1998 791,909.78 791,809.78 100.000000 313397E98 MAT 09/08/1998 08-SEP-1998 -791,909.78 -791,809.78 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY O8-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,600,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NTS 14-SEP-1998 2,565,881.50 2,565,681.50 100.000000 313397F71 MAT 09/14/1998 14-SEP-1998 -2,565,081.50 -2,565,801.50 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 29 0CSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-SEP-1998 889,288.66 889,288.66 100.000000 36959JJ95 09/09/1998 09-SEP-1998 -889,288.66 -889,288.66 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 09-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 28-SEP-199B 788,410.00 788,410.00 100.000000 63743DJU6 09/28/1998 28-SEP-1998 -788,410.00 -788,410.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 28-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBS 17-SEP-1998 5,000,000,00 5,000,000.00 100.000000 3134AONN8 5.990% 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/96 17-SEP-1998 -4,851,562.50 -4,851,562.50 100.000000 CAL ----------- 148,437.50 148,437.50 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DEES 17-SEP-1998 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.000000 3134AONN8 5.990% 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/96 17-SEP-1998 5,000,000.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 30-SEP-1998 62,000.00 62,000.00 0.000000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 30-SEP-1998 62,000.00 O.OD 0.000000 IT 30-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 199,767.55 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-SEP-1998 11,969.70 11,969.70 0.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-SEP-1998 11,969.70 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 16-SEP-1998 15,746.78 15,746.78 0.000000 171200EBO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 15-SEP-1998 15,746.78 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 30 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 306,843.60 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 15-SEP-1998 2,579.04 2,579.04 0.000000 21075NDKO 6.190% 10/15/2011 DD 11/23/96 01-SEP-1998 2,579.04 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 435,461.52 FHLMC GROUP #G5-0476 15-SEP-1998 99,315.08 99,315.08 0.000000 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 01-SEP-1998 99,315.08 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 92,962.19 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-SEP-1998 23,977.54 23,977.54 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-AUG-1998 23,977.54 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF III A6 25-SEP-1998 10,933.33 10,833.33 0.000000 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 25-SEP-1998 10,933.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 47,404.50 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 15-SEP-1998 6,437.69 6,437.69 0.000000 3133702DS 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-SEP-1998 6,437.69 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC O8-SEP-1998 8,190.22 8,190.22 0.000000 313397E98 MAT 09/08/1998 08-SEP-1998 8,190.22 0.00 0.000000 IT 08-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 FED HOME IN MTG CORP DISC NTS 14-SEP-1998 34,118.50 34,118.50 0.000000 313397F71 MAT 09/14/1998 14-SEP-1998 34,118.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 14-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DEES 08-SEP-1998 149,750.00 149,750.00 0.000000 3134AONN8 5.990% 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/96 06-SEP-1998 149,750.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 08-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 31 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DEBS 17-SEP-1998 9,151.39 9,151.39 0.000000 3134AONW8 5.990% 03/06/2001 DD 03/06/96 06-SEP-1998 9,151.39 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,016.54 FNMA POOL #0065581 25-SEP-1998 2,460.02 2,460.02 0.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/02/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-SEP-1998 2,460.02 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN O1-SEP-1998 140,175.00 140,175.00 0.000000 31364CKV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 01-SEP-1998 140,175.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,134.00 FNMA POOL 10238575 25-SEP-1998 2,136.49 2,136.49 0.000000 3137006L8 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-SEP-1998 2,136.49 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,726.42 FNMA POOL #0313371 25-SEP-1998 4,779.62 4,779.62 0.000000 31374GCG0 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-SEP-1998 4,779.62 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,332.13 FNMA POOL #0313600 25-SEP-1998 4,632.45 4,632.45 0.000000 31374GKMB 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-SEP-1998 4,632.45 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,536.99 FNMA POOL #0313769 25-SEP-1998 1,121.18 1,121.18 0.000000 31374GOWO 6.151% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-SEP-1998 1,121.16 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,090.06 FNMA POOL #0313783 25-SEP-1998 4,199.62 4,189.82 0.000000 31374GRC3 6.1571 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-SEP-1998 4,189.82 0.00 0.000000 Page 32 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IRV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ IT 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,703.43 FNMA POOL /0339016 25-SEP-1998 3,267.45 3,267.45 0.000000 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-SEP-1998 3,267.45 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,767.35 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-SEP-1998 1,736.47 1,736.47 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-SEP-1998 1,736.47 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR 4 00177 30-SEP-1998 94,785.00 94,785.00 0.000000 345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DD 03/30/94 30-SEP-1998 94,785.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 70,131.16 GNMA II POOL #0008684 21-SEP-1998 9,422.58 9,422.58 0.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO O8/01/95 01-SEP-1998 9,422.58 0.00 0.000000 IT 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 144,224.25 GNMA II POOL #0080023 21-SEP-1998 16,988.96 16,988.96 0.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-SEP-1998 16,988.96 0.00 0.000000 IT 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 334,889.74 GNMA II POOL 40B0088M 21-SEP-1998 25,134.33 25,134.33 0.000000 36225CC20 6.875% 06/20/2027 DD O6/01/97 01-SEP-1998 25,134.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 09-SEP-1998 10,711.34 10,711.34 0.000000 36959JJ95 09/09/1998 09-SEP-1998 10,711.34 0.00 0.000000 IT 09-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN 01-SEP-1998 60,387.78 60,387.78 0.000000 Page 33 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 42333HJN3 FLTG RT O6/01/2000 DO 04/07/98 01-SEP-1998 60,387.78 0.00 0.000000 IT O1-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN 24-SEP-1998 60,796.66 60,796.66 0.000000 44181KZAS FLTG RT O6/24/2003 DO O6/24/98 24-SEP-1998 60,796.66 0.00 0.000000 IT 24-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN HITTER SR NOTES 24-AUG-1998 -100,786.35 -100,786.35 O.000DOO 61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 24-AUG-1998 -100,786.35 0.00 0.0000D0 ITC 24-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.ODOD00000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 MORGAN ST DEAN HITTER SR NOTES 26-AUG-1998 100,786.35 100,786.35 0.000000 61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DD 02/23/98 26-AUG-1998 100,786.35 0.00 0.000000 IT 26-AUG-1998 0.00 O.OD 1.000000000 O.OD LIQUID OPER-FIMCO 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 28-SEP-1998 11,590.00 11,590.00 0.000000 63743DJU6 09/28/1998 28-SEP-1998 11,590.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 28-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 21,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-SEP-1998 685,312.50 685,312.50 0.000000 912827Z54 06.375% 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 30-SEP-1998 685,312.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,800.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-AUG-1998 -12,800.00 -12,800.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -12,800.00 0.00 O.D00000 ITC 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-AUG-1998 12,800.00 12,800.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 31-AUG-1998 12,800.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 PAYABLE 08/31/98 0.00 i/JNG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 34 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST I , CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-SEP-1998 - 30-SEP-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 6,876.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 02-SEP-1998 0,076.00 8,876.00 0.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 01/15/97 15-JUL-1998 8,976.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,876.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 02-SEP-1998 -8,876.00 -8,876.00 0.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -0,876.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 02-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 02-SEP-1998 8,976.00 8,876.00 0.000000 9120273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 02-SEP-1998 9,876.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 02-SEP-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 PAYABLE 09/02/98 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 30-SEP-1999 -543.71 -543.71 0.000000 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 30-SEP-1998 -543.71 0.00 0.000000 CW AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 30-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-SEP-1998 737.87 737.87 0.000000 996005247 01-SEP-1998 737.87 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 01-SEP-1998 4,419.50 4,419.50 0.000000 996085247 01-SEP-1998 4,419.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 01-SEP-1998 9.28 9.28 0.000000 996087094 VAR RT DD 06/26/1997 01-SEP-1998 9.28 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 35 FAHR COMMITTEE Nesting oz a I To W.W D, 10/21/98 10/28/98 AGENDA REPORT 10 Number Ihm Nu�99t�qq i'7(dl Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS, THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND THE CONTROLLER'S SALARIES (FAHR98-77) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the base salaries for the positions of Assistant General Manager, Director of Communications, Director of Information Technology and Controller to be above the maximum of the pay ranges. SUMMARY For the past two years, staff has been involved in designing a new compensation and classification program known as Broadbanding. In early October the General Manager, Assistant General Manager, Director of Human Resources and the Assistant to the General Manager met with the Chairman, Vice Chairman, and past Chairman of the Board to discuss Broadbanding for executive and division management. It was agreed that staff would postpone recommendations on Broadbanding for Executive and Division Managers until after negotiations are concluded with supervisors, professionals, Local 501 Operating Engineers and the Orange County Employees' Association. However, since there were a few classifications that needed to be addressed immediately, it was suggested that staff return to the FAHR Committee to address the individual classifications rather than Broadband the entire group. Because management believed that Broadbanding would be implemented in July, we allowed the salaries of the Assistant General Manager, the Director of Information Technology, the Director of Communications and the Controller to advance past the maximum of their pay ranges. According to a market comparison of executive management positions conducted in June of this year, the salaries of the individuals just mentioned will be at market when adjusted. Although staff recommended to the FAHR Committee extending the salary ranges of certain management employees, the FAHR Committee, after careful review and discussion, recommends the following: x�.mfty nu.rMWMRmwaFui rMa R. a Page 1 1. Redcircle, or authorize salaries above the published range for the following: Classification Maximum Annual Salary Assistant General Manager $142,983 Director of Information Technology 120,000 Director of Communications 88,985 Controller 104,618 2. To be effective July 1, 1998. 3. No other changes in pay ranges shall be considered until the Board Workshop on Human Resource issues is held. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS H. a ftt la,.�AHWAHaaeaeFAHn IM m R.H..a eaose Page 2 Y BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Tog or o1r. ioiiaiee AGENDA REPORT IMm Number Item tuber Orange County Sanitation Distri FROM: David Lu i , rector of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve the plans and specifications for Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-1, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 3) Award a contract to Southern Contracting Company for Job No. P2-47-1 providing for miscellaneous improvements to electrical and control systems at Plant No. 2 for a total not to exceed $1,271,000. SUMMARY This project is for the construction of miscellaneous tasks identified by District staff to improve operations, reliability, and safety. In this project, the contractor will: • Upgrade electrical systems at the Plant Water Pump Station. • Upgrade ventilation for three power buildings. • Replace a PCB-filled transformer. • Install vibration sensors at the ocean outall pumps. • Install new level detectors and a programmable logic controller for the emergency ouffall pumping system. The plans and specifications for Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-07-1, were completed in August 1998. The design was performed by Lee & Ro, Inc. The Engineer's estimate is $2,000,000. On September 15, 1998, four bids were received ranging from $1.902,000 to the low bid of$1,271,000 submitted by Southern Contracting Company. The Director of Engineering recommends award of the contract to Southern Contracting Company. Construction completion is scheduled for March 2000. RM : •,•„ Page 1 A transfer of$72,000 is requested from the Contingency Funds category to the Design category. The transfer between categories will reflect the actual costs expended to the end of the design period. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: Section 8, Page 9,Treatment Plant No.2, 5.e.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Staff is requesting the award of a construction contract for the project titled Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P247-1. The project will: 1. Provide a second power feed to the Plant Water Pump Station to improve reliability. 2. Replace and upgrade 20-year-old electrical equipment at the Plant Water Pump Station to increase reliability. 3. Install air-handling equipment to condition the air for three power distribution buildings to protect the electrical equipment from premature corrosion and failure and reduce maintenance requirements. 4. Replace a 20-year-old PCB-filled transformer. This is the only transformer remaining at the treatment plants filled with toxic PCB. Removal of this transformer will lower the District's exposure to liability issues regarding toxic PCBs. 5. Upgrade existing vibration sensors for the ocean outfall pumps to protect the equipment. 6. Replace the existing level measuring devices for the outfall termination channel and connect the level signals to the plant-wide computerized monitoring and control system. The level signals are used to automatically start the emergency outfall pumps. In December 1993. the Boards of Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Lee & Ro, Inc., for the design of miscellaneous improvements at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2. The miscellaneous tasks were identified by District staff to improve operations, reliability, plant efficiency, and health and safety. This project, Job No. P2-47-1, is one of many construction projects issued under this large design project. Rm apace Page 2 Y On September 15, 1998, four bids were received ranging from $1,902,000 to the low bid of$1,271,000 submitted by Southern Contracting Company, The Director of Engineering recommends award of the contract to Southern Contracting Company. Construction completion is scheduled for March 2000. In reviewing the project budget, the expenditures through the design period were $517,000. Of this amount, $338,000 was for the Design Consultant, and $179,000 was for other costs accumulated during the design period. These other costs include staff, benefits, overhead, materials, vehicle usage, and other outside services. The $179,000 exceeded the estimated $107,000 by $72,000. A transfer of$72,000 is requested from the Contingency Funds category to the Design category to reflect the actual expenditures reported in the Financial Information System. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed, because the recommendation is to award the lowest responsible bidder. CEUA FINDINGS This project is exempt per CEQA and Districts Guidelines, Section 15301(B). The Notice of Exemption was filed with the County Clerk on December 15, 1993. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Bid Tabulation and Recommendation WTS:jo:jam:jo:jcr G:Wg1obaM9enda Draft RepoftUolnl 8=rdsW-amrd1098.dw R..we: enaae Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-47-1 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design Other $ 326,000 S 107,000 $ 72,000 $ 179,000 $ 107,000 $ 72,000 $ 179,000 $ 179,000 100% Design Consultant $ 300,000 $ 406,000 $ 406.000 $ 394,331 $ 394,331 $ 338,000 86 Construction Contract I $ 2,938.000 $ 2.512.600 $ 2,512,600 $ - $ 1.271.000 $ 1.271.000 $ 0% Construction Other $ 486,000 $ 719,400 $ 719 400 $ 86,344 $ 633.056 $ 719.400 $ 0% Contingency $ 655,000 $ 72000 $ 583000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 4,050,000 $ 4400,000 $ - $ 4,400,000 $ 587675 $ 1,976,056 $ 2,563,731 $ 517.000 20% HN oW4 n99obecontrac1sP2J7-1%.d,,Qb1 P247-1 ewm4 Form RWN M9198 6 September 15, 1998 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 1 BID TABULATION MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-47-1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $2,000,000.00 CONSTRUCTION BUDGET: $2,304,300.00 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. SOUTHERN CONTRACTING CO. $ 1,271,000 2. J.W. CONTRACTING CORP. $ 1,595,600 3. SHASTA ELECTRIC $ 1,702,000 4. NCCI $ 1,902,000 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ 8. $ 9. $ 10. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommen ward to SOUTHERN CONTRACTING COMPANY in the bid amount of$1,271,0 as the lowest and best bid. 4Di LudwinP, .E. Director of Engineering WadonWata 1 kwp dtaf ngVOBS&C ONTRACTST2.4741p2.47-1 Bid Tab doc OCSO • P.O.Box 8127 ,Fountain vainev. CA 92728-8127 ,(714)962-2411 BOARD OF DIRECTORS McAtlR9 Date To ad.of Do. ioi2e/se AGENDA REPORT hunNunw n7mbw Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Lu rector of Engineering Originator. Jim Hams, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: CONTRACT AWARD FOR SEISMIC RETROFIT OF FOUR STRUCTURES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-044 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION The General Manager recommends the Board of Directors: (1) Approve the plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1444, providing for additional structural support to existing structures, waterproof coating, and other miscellaneous items, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary. (2) Receive and file letter dated October 5, 1998, from Valley Waterproofing, Inc., protesting the waterproofing applicator qualifications for all bids. (3) Receive and file memorandum dated October 13, 1998, from General Counsel. (4) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation rejecting all bids. (5) Authorize General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P144-4 (Rebid). (Tentative bid date December 1, 1998) SUMMARY Job No. P144-4 was designed by Holmes and Narver with additional work added to the project designed by Lee& Ro and Lord Fleming Architects. This work will construct additions to existing structures to strengthen and better resist earthquakes. The additional work will waterproof the Administration Building and modify the entrance areas. The plans and specifications for this project, Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1444, were bid on September 15, 1998. Four bids were received ranging from a high of$927,711 to the low bid of$658,000 submitted by Ark Construction Company. The Engineer's estimate was $828,000. The spec cations for the work to waterproof the Administration Building required a specialty contractor with five years experience in the specified waterproofing product. The low bid contractor did not list a subcontractor for the work, nor does G NlpbEaMgenEa pfM1 RepW Vonl&urmVt J�JN1LJ♦R�epf al bh he Renato Page 1 w this contractor have the required experience. None of the remaining bidders had the required experience or listed a subcontractor that had the required experience applying the specified waterproofing product. Therefore, all bids are considered nonresponsive. Staff recommends that the Board of Directors receive and file the bid tabulation and recommendation rejecting all bids, and authorize the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-444 (Rebid). The tentative bid date is December 1, 1998. The specifications will be revised to clarify the qualifications for the waterproofing work. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 8, Line 6-C and Line 5-B) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Combining the two projects requires the transfer of construction monies from Budget Line 5-b to 6-c. The amount transferred shall be$200,000. The total new budget for Job No. P144 is now $1,204,000. Two work items designed under Job No. P140-1 are included in the construction contract for Job No. P1444. Funding for these two work items is allocated in the 1998-99 fiscal year budget under Job No. P140-1 (Section 8, Page 8, Line 5-b). A transfer of$200,000 from budget line item 5-b will provide for the budget increase for Job No. P1-444. This information is shown on the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This seismic retrofit program was recommended by the 1989 Master Plan to enact measures to reduce the facility and system vulnerabilities that could occur during a large localized earthquake. The Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1444, is the final construction phase in a series of projects addressing risk reduction. This work will provide additional structural supports for the Blower Building, Dewatering Building 'C', Belt Press Building, and the Administration Building. These improvements will provide stronger connections between the roof of a structure and a wall, and reinforcing the connection between the wall and the foundation. Holmes& Narver Engineers completed this design. c a�eae.oneMm own a.wauom m„mwiu.�wiva ra.,.�.n.�ae..ex n...,.a Page 2 Two work items from Job No. P1-40-1 were incorporated into this construction project. The transferred work includes waterproofing the Administration Building and installing a protective awning to the entrance area. The work was combined due to common areas being modified. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are presented, as all bidders are deemed non-responsive. CEQA FINDINGS Not a "Project' as defined by CEQA Section 15378. No Further action required. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation 3. Valley Waterproofing Letter dated October 5, 1998 4. General Counsel Memorandum dated October 13, 1998 JRH:jo:jam:jcr G�bmrtnanm Uvn Fewaudm BoaNawlsbawtsL-e Aft+e�zlv0 eGs.as AWw Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. I JOB NO. PI-44-4 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTrIASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) P1,14-4 1229,000 $ $ Design $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 180.000 $ 180,000 $ 165.000 92% Construction $ 900,000 I $ 100000 $ 1,000.000 $ - $ - 0% Const. Management $ 29.000 $ 000 $ 129,000 $ - $ - 0% 10 Desi n Staff $ 20,000 � $$ 20,000 �kl $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 12.000 60% P 1 TOTAL $ 1,129,000 $ 200.000 $ 1.329,000 $ 200.000 $ 200,000 $ 177,000 1 20% Note: Two work items designed under Job No. Pl-40-1 are included in the construction contract for Job No. Pl-444. Funding for these two work items is allocated in the 1998-99 fiscal year budget under Job No. P1-40-1 (Section 8, Page 8, Line 5-b). A transfer of$200,000 from budget line item 5-b will provide for the budget increase for Job No. Pl-44-4. H, ,ft� W dgela l Budget Table Revised M9198 , September 15, 1998 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: BID TABULATION SEISMIC RETROFIT OF FOUR STRUCTURES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-444 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $828.000 APPROX. BUDGET AMOUNT: $1,400,000.00 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. ARK CONSTRUCTION CO. $ 658,000 2. VAHDANI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. $ 729,076 3. SEDCON ENGINEERS CONTRACTORS. INC. $ 744,890 4. METRO BUILDERS & ENGINEERS GROUP, LTD. $ 927,711 5. $ 6. $ 7. $ B. $ 9. $ 10. $ 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that all bids are nonresponsive. I, therefore, recommend r cting all bids. (40�- David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering Hiwp.Eta%engUOBS&CONTRACTSTI-4441p1.444 Bid Tab Rejection doc OCSD • Po Boy 8127 .Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 •(714)962-2411 FE-E-RValle-y RECEIVSD P.O. Bo. 20003, San Jos., CA 95160 ENGINFERING Tel: AOS-988-7701 F..: a08-985-0956 DER"RTA6'SW October5,1998 CNl r 1998 COUNTY SANMAMCA Mr. Dave Ludwin DISTRICTS OF Ms.Wendy Sevenaadt OI-bOM COUNTY Orange County Sanitation District PO Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Re: Seismic Retrofit of Four Structures at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Job# PI 44 1 This letter serves as an official protest as it pertains to bid selection of prime contractor for the referenced project It is our belief should listed low bidder,Ark Construction,be approved as prime contractor, ndes under the California Public Contracts Code,specifically section 4106,would be ignored and not enforced. Ark Construction did not[in a subcontractor for waterproofing work required on the Administration building and per the letter of the law under section 4106: "Ifa prime cronowtorfafls to specify a subcontractor or ifthe prime contractor speafies more than one subcomractorfor the same portion ofwork to be performed under the contract in excess of K of l%oflhe prime contractor's twat bid the prime contractor agrees that he or she isfully qualified to perform that portion himselfor herself, and that the prime contractor shall perform that portion himsetfor herself" Ark Construction should be thrown out for the following reasons: -The value of the waterproofing work is approximately 10-15%the total price. RecogaiAug Ark Construction has no previous experience with installation of lbw Corning sealant or AIIGuard Elastomeric Wall Coating coupled with the specifications clear request for the applicator to document a minimum 5 years experience and 5 completed projects using the specified system,the bid should be disqualified -Valley Waterproofing,Inc.was asked to enter into an agreement similar to what is being proposed to Regal Waterproofing who has successfully managed and completed minimum 5 projects in the last 5 years. Valley Waterproofing,Inc.,through iinterpretation of the code, considers any agreement reached by Ark Construction with any other'approved'contractor with the ability to fulfill requirements of the specifications illegal under California Public Contracts Code and therefore rejected his request Simply adding field labor with application experience to Ark Construction's payroll should not qualify Ark as approved and experienced to perform the waterproofing work. The specifications call for an experienced 'applicator'R in my previous 6 years of experience as Dow Coming's sales representative in Southern California,I do not recall ever providing a warranty to field labor or Laborers. Applicators(companies)were provided warranties because of their ability to manage a project,snocessfidly installing per manufacnuer recommendations. Although this process i Qi consists of physically installing sealant&coating,more importantly,it demands experienced, knowledgeable supervision and leadership provided by the applicator(contractor)performing the work. Regal Waterproofing successfully managed and completed these projects,not Ark Construction. Allowing Ark Construction to hire labor or management from Regal to fulfil( requirements of the specifications should be considered incomplete. Employing both labor& management from Regal,renting equipment and purchasing material from Regal(who does not own equipment or warehouse and supply materials)is essentially an agreement to perform the work with Regal Waterproofing and should be recognized as illegal. -The fact that Dow Coming issued a letter of intent to warrant Ark Construction should hold no merit toward approving Ark Construction. Since Dow Coming has m'approved'applicator program,they will warrant the performance of their products to anyone wishing to install. The key is that the products must be installed correctly or the warranty becomes null and void. Therefore,in order to fulfill the sanitation district's desire to get an experienced applicator to perform the work with the highest probability of success,the focus must be on the requirements of the company attempting to perform the work as originally planned. To approve a company with zero experience,ignoring the specifications,would be an injustice to thou companies including Valley Waterproofing,Inc.,who meet the requirements of the specification and put in much time and effort to bid the project. All other bids should be disqualified for the following reasons: -All other prime bidders listing a waterproofing applicator listed I Francis Co.who does not have a to aimum 5 completed projects utilizing Dow Coming's system. Unfortunately,the only justifiable action is to disqualify all bids. In closing,the Orange County Sanitation District developed a set or waterproofing specifications around a complex,`cadillac'system which must be applied by a trained and experienced applicator in order to insure a successful installation. You had the right idea,now please enforce it It is regrettable that prime contractors attempting to bid the project did not do their homework or thou not to follow the rules For reasons previously mentioned,all bids most be thrown out and the process attempted again. Any decision short of this would open the door for legal action for thou qualified contractors who pursued the project within the guidelines of the law. Regards,/ Robert Kench VP Sales BOARD OF DIRECTORS M ,,q Dare TOBO.of D, 0/2.: AGENDA REPORT Item Numee lC;Z6T e. Orange County Sanitation District Cl FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: SUMMONS & COMPLAINT RE ROBERT BURGE, ET AL. V. SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY, ET AL. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Robert Burge, at al. v. Sanitation District of Orange County, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 800278, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY Complaint filed by 13 former employees of the District and served on October 20, 1998. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEOA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS GGS:SK:BG M rvo J,aOnZMgeygmV PtlavmNli.nmv 9auon tO:IDtl a AP„ua srwna Page 1