Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-09-23 a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 16, 1998 phone: (7141962 2411 m.gles.ddre..: NOTICE OF MEETING P.D. Bor 8127 Fountain Valle,CA 92728-9127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS •t'"•t•ddr•••' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1 DB44 By.Avenue Fountain Valley,C 9 2 708-7018 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1998 - 6:30 P.M. DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Member 10844 Ellis Avenue Agencies Fountain Valley, California 92708 • C11•• The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Atuhare Sanitation District will be held at the above location, time and date. area Buena Perk Gypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Gorden Grave Hunbngton Beach Irvine Le Habra La Palm. Lee Alamlte. Newport Beach B d Secretal Grange Placentia Sense Ana Sea/eaten Stanton Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings ,at. Villa Perk Wrbt Linda County of Orange STEERING COMMITTEE/AD HOC 9.nit.ry 01...into COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN - Wednesday,September 23, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. Coate Mean Midway City PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, October 8, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Weser Obericn Pvine Reath OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 14, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 21, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 28, 1998 at 5:00 p.m. To Protect She Public Health and the Environment through Excellence in Westeweter Systems- BOARD MEETING DATES Month Board Meeting September September 23, 1998 October October 28, 1998 November November18, 1998 December December16, 1998 January January 27, 1999 February February 24, 1999 March March 24, 1999 April April28, 1999 May May 26, 1999 June June 23, 1999 July July 28, 1999 August August 25, 1999 September September 22, 1999 October October 27, 1999 AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 1998—6:30 P.M. i In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relafing to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 09/23/98 Page 2 of 7 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the meeting held on July 29, 1998 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: O8105/98 08/19/98 Totals $1 691,228.32 $2 342,681.13 CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEM NOS. 9- 121 All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: 9. 1) Approve the 1994 Amendment to the National Water Research Institute (NWRI) Joint Powers Agreement which did not undergo official Board action or approval due to an NWRI oversight; and 2)Approve Amendments No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 to the 1994 Amendment to the NWRI Joint Powers Agreement. 10. Approve Sewer Service Agreement with the City of La Habra and City of La Habra Heights to provide sewer service re Tract 46591, in form approved by the General Counsel. 09/23/98 Page 3 of 7 11. Approve Sewer Service Agreement with Los Angeles County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District and Shea Homes to provide sewer service, in form approved by the General Counsel. 12. 1) Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, a Public Joint Powers Agency v. David E. and Joyce R. Griswold, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 797439, in connection with eminent domain acquisition of Parcel No. 300290-1, including sewer easement owned by the District in the vicinity of Jamboree Road and Barranca Parkway in the City of Irvine; and 2) authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 13. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 09/23/98 Page 4 of 7 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re September 23, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT COMBINED STEERING/AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 26, 1998 to be filed. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re September 2, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 2, 1998 to be filed. C. Approve an amendment to the Lease Amendment (Specification No. L-009-1)with Seaside Financial Corporation,for 18.09 acres of land at the northeast comer of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the city of Fountain Valley, for one year. d. 1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Advanced Engine Technology Corporation (AETC)to provide engineering services to design, install and certify a Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines, for an amount not to exceed $342,000; and, 2) Authorize the General Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with a source-testing firth to provide air emissions monitoring in support of installation of the Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines for an amount not to exceed $95,000. e. Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Schreiber Corporation to provide a Fuzzy Filter1°unit for a one-year test for an amount not to exceed $150,000. f. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Data Solutions Group, LLC for the development of a written implementation plan, purchase of off-the-shelf software, and customization, population, and commissioning of the Air Quality Information Management System (AIMS), for an amount not to exceed $127,000. 16. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design, and Construction Committee re September 3, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 3, 1998 to be filed. 09/23/98 Page 5 of 7 (Continued from page 4) 16. c. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Spec Services for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, for a total amount not to exceed $2,121,748. d. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Design of Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, for a total amount not to exceed $1,993,000. e. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for Area Classification Studies for Plants No. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35,for a total amount not to exceed $488,600. f. 1) Approve plans and specifications for the Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Fountain Valley Channel to Orangethorpe Avenue; Eucid Relief Trunk Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue; and Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Marian Sewer to Carbon Creek Channel, Contract No. 2-34R; and 2)Approve a budget amendment of$325,000 for a total project budget of$1,390,600. 17. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re September 9, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 9, 1998 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 1998. C. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period April 1, 1998 through June 30, 1998. d. Receive and file FY 1997-98 End of Year Operational Report for the period ending June 30, 1998. 09/23/98 Page 6 of 7 (Continued from page 5) 17. f. Approve the following revised rates for flow, SOD and suspended solids for Class I and Class 11 Source Control Permit Users: Proposed Rates Zone Flow BOD sollos per Per 1000# per 1000# 1 271.08 223.04 213.39 2 208.07 171.19 163.79 3 212.28 174.66 167.11 5 237.59 195.48 187.03 6 222.13 182.76 174.86 7 168.70 138.81 132.80 11 224.94 185.07 177.07 13 281.17 231.34 221.34 18. 1) Receive and file Staff Report dated September 23, 1998; and, 2) Direct Staff to proceed with preparation of the Strategic Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report(Job No. J-404), designating the preferred alternative as follows: 1. Level of Treatment • Discharge a blend of primary and secondary effluent to meet the requirements of our 1998 ocean discharge permit. 2. Water Reclamation • Participate in Phase 1 of Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR System)with the Orange County Water District and contribute up to$125 million (50%)of the capital cost. 3. Peak Flow Management • Utilize existing in-plant storage to mitigate peak flows; • Participate in Phase 1 of the GWR System to provide 100 mgd of peak wet weather flow relief, and 50 mgd average daily flow; • Rely on the 78-inch outfall for emergency discharge of secondary effluent at an estimated frequency of once every 3 years by the year 2020. 19. CLOSED SESSION; During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in dosed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. 09/23/98 Page 7 of 7 (Continued from page 6) 19. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(C). 2. Evaluation of General Manager's performance (Government Code Section 54957). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 20. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 21. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 22, Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 23. Adjournments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the dose of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 M9wp Eta%agendaM 998 Joint Board AgendasZ92398.doc CHAIRMAN'S REPORT BOARD MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 23, 1998 1 . I WANT TO CALL YOUR ATTENTION TO THE LIST OF UPCOMING MEETINGS. BECAUSE OF CONFLICTS WITH THE LEAGUE OF CITIES MEETING, THE DATES HAVE BEEN CHANGED. OMTS WILL MEET AT 5:30 P.M. ON OCTOBER 14TH PDC WILL MEET AT 5:30 P.M. ON OCTOBER 8TH AND FAHR WILL MEETS AT 5:30 P.M. ON OCTOBER 21ST THE NOVEMBER COMMITTEE MEETINGS WILL BE HELD ACCORDING TO THE USUAL SCHEDULE. HOWEVER, THE NOVEMBER BOARD MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THE THIRD WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18TH BECAUSE OF THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY. THE DECEMBER BOARD MEETING WILL ALSO BE HELD ON THE THIRD WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16TH BECAUSE OF THE CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY. ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: September 23. 1998 TIME: 6:30 p.m. (HOLMBERG)........ANDERSON .................. , ✓ (FLORY)...............BANKHEAD ....................az a, — (BOYD)................BROWN ......................... — (COOK) ...............COLLINS ...................... — (NOYES) ..............DEBAY......................... �G i (FRESCHI)............DENES.........................� — (DOTSON) ...........DONAHUE..................... ✓ _ (PARKER).............DUNLAP....................... .. (UNDERHILL) ........ECKENRODE.................� (PERRY)...............FERRYMAN .................. . _ (WISNER).............GULLIXSON.................. � c (BROADWATER) ...LEYES.......................... ✓ r —_ (MAULLER) ..........MARSHALL .................. ./ (LUTZ).................MCGUIGAN .................i ✓ — (WALKER)............MINER-BRADFORD ........ �/ �L (COONTZ)............MURPHY......................(KEENAN) ............PIERCY ........................ ✓ ✓ — (EVANS)..............RICE............................ w (POTTS) ..............SALTARELLI ................. (HAMMOND)........SHEA...........................� (SPITZER) ............STEINER .........................L i — (HARMAN)...........SULLIVAN....................�/ y/ — (MILLER)..............SWAN ......................... .. — (BATES) ..............SYLVIA........................ �G (DALY) ................ZEMEL......................... _� — Anders on t� Anderson W,rsu.w Ghirelli ✓ Hodges Kyle Ludwin / McIntyre a Miles ✓ Ooten ✓ Peterman Streed ✓ Tuchman ✓ OTHERS: ✓ ' � / ./1 i•O „/� `�` '�'ur.�,�" Woodruff Andrus ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 16, 1998 pb.ne: (714)962 2411 To the Chairman and Members of the Board of Directors m.111, dd..: PO. 8.8127 rtuntah W11'..Ca Subject: Board Letter 92728-8127 .n..c.ddres.: 10.ere A�.nue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional rounc2 vallal A cA 9 information on any of the items, please call me. 2 08-7 Public Response to Rate Structure Changes Member I have included several articles on the recent rate structure changes that have Agencies appeared in local newspapers. Past Chair John Collins has submitted a rebuttal to • the September 1, 1998 editorial by Edward T. Marshall entitled 'Those Alice-in- Melee Wondedand tax formulas.' It was scheduled to appear in the Register's Sunday, September 13 issue, but it has been delayed to Sunday, September 20. A ropy of Mahe" John's letter to the editor is enclosed. Brae Buena Perk Gilwa. Fountain Valley Odor Complaints Fullerton When Grove Huntington Beach Unfortunately, we continue to receive odor complaints from our neighbors, especially Irvine when the temperature and humidity are higher than normal. Operations responds to Le Habra each complaint and makes the necessary corrections to the treatment processes. Le Palma P ry Los werh the Neapart Beech ore , . U.S. Chamber of Commerce Broadcast on Deregulation Patenm Sense Ane Seal Beach Bob Ooten was one of seven panel members on a U.S. Chamber of Commerce cable s�uwn television and internal broadcast discussing unique opportunities in water and vm. Pan: wastewater as a result of electricity restructuring. The presentation was broadcast rorba Linea live on Tuesday, September 15. The two-hour presentation will be re-broadcast on eeuetP er a .... CSPAN cable television and can be viewed in the future on the Internet. Bob spoke on the District's present energy management practices, including energy conservation, process optimization, new technology development, and how to take Seek., ol.tHc.. advantage of the developing California deregulation opportunities. A video of the Chen Main discussions will also be available in the near future. Midway C"y Water 01.W.t. 1998-99 League of California Cities Officers Irvine Ranch In case you haven't heard, Director Jan Debay has been elected First Vice President of the Orange County Division, League of California Cities for 1998-99. Congratulations, Jan. 'TO Protect the Pudic Health and the Environment Mmugh Excellence in Wastewater S,,lne- o q,. Letter to the Board of Directors Page 2 September 16, 1998 Urban Sprawl The Sierra Club has identified urban sprawl as the fastest growing environmental issue in the country. See the enclosed Daily Environment Report article dated September 10, 1998. Treatment Membranes The American Society of Civil Engineers has a featured article in its September 1998 Civil Engineering magazine on membranes for water treatment. A copy of the article is enclosed. Honolulu to Pour on the Chlorine Honolulu, like the Sanitation District, has an ocean discharge permit with site-specific limitations issued in accordance with Section 301(h) of the federal Clean Water Act. Also like the Sanitation District, Honolulu has been able to discharge treated wastewater without disinfection, except under certain wind conditions. Honolulu's scientific assessment has determined that public health is fully protected by the location of the outfall, which is 1.5 miles offshore. By contract, our outfall is 4 miles offshore. Despite the advice of staff and scientists and the findings of EPA in its original issuance of the ocean discharge permit, Mayor Jeremy Harris has directed staff to commence disinfection using chlorine. Additional details are outlined in the enclosed news release by the City and County of Honolulu and the Honolulu Advertiser newspaper article. State Legislative Update The California Legislature completed this years session on September 1 The Governor has 30 days to veto enrolled bills. Unfortunately, the legislature was unable to pass the proposed Water Bond. This would have included grant and loan monies for reclamation projects such as the Groundwater Replenishment System. Despite failure of the Bond issue, San Diego and the Metropolitan Water District (MET)were able to get last minute support for monies necessary to line the All-American canal in support of the water transfer from the Imperial Irrigation District to San Diego through MET facilities. One bill of interest to the Staff is Assembly Bill 2339. This bill requires the State Water Resources Control Board to complete the mandates of the Bay Protection and Toxic Clean-up Program to clean-up toxic hot spot identified through the program. Dischargers, such as the District, have been required to pay for this program through fees that ended last year. Now the Slate will be required to assure that the identified sites are remediated. The bill also provides protection for dischargers from Letter to the Board of Directors Page 3 September 16, 1998 duplicative costs or actions when identified sites are already undergoing remedial action by another regulatory agency. Caffed Bay Delta Program Faltering We received the following correspondence from a representative on the Milk Producers Council (MPC). "Last Thursday I participated in the Southern California Urban Water Conference. Al that conference we received briefings from the various participants in the CALFED Bay-Delta program. "As you may recall, MPC has been very involved in the effort to secure adequate water supplies to meet the needs of both California's cities and farms. The major problem facing California's water supply is created by the fact that the plumbing system which moves water from Northern California to Southern and Central California is broken. This water must pass through the Sacramento- San Joaquin River Delta on its way from the North to the South. The water passes through canals that were created by levies, built at the turn of the century, that were never intended to be water conveyance facilities. Furthermore, the export of water from the delta is effected by the ocean tides which creates water quality problems because of salt water intrusion into the fresh water supply. The current plumbing system also causes fishery problems because it disrupts and disorients the flow of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers which negatively impact migrating fish like salmon. "There has been a concentrated planning effort, called the CALFED Bay-Delta Program since 1995, which has been committed to producing a specific plan to "fix"the problems of the delta while maintaining and enhancing the water supply and water quality for the millions of people and millions of acres of farmland that depend on the delta for a water supply. CALFED has been promising to produce this plan by the end of 1998. We received an update on their progress at the Thursday conference. Unfortunately, CALFED has now backed off of its commitment to produce a complete and specific plan to solve the delta's problems this year, and is instead moving ahead with a scaled down, short term band-aide approach that will not solve the major problems facing the delta. In particular, CALFED is backing away from solutions which would meet their commitment to providing an adequate water supply for Central and Southern California. "This backing away takes a couple fortes. One, CALFED under pressure from the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) is putting up major objections to constructing new surface storage reservoirs. EPA instead insists that the water needs of the growing population of California can be met by water conservation Letter to the Board of Directors Page 4 September 16, 1998 and water transfers. This is strongly disputed by both the urban and agriculture representatives in this process. They believe, and we agree, that California needs more places to store water in wet years when it is plentiful, so that it will be available in dry years when it is needed. This can only be accomplished if California has the proper infrastructure which would include more surface storage reservoirs and a better water conveyance system through the delta. The second deficiency of CALFED is in their failure to provide for a better plumbing system in the delta. CALFED acknowledges that they have to do something about the plumbing, but the facility that the CALFED scientists and engineers have identified as the best facility for water quality and EPA is rejecting fish at the behest of the most radical environmentalists in the state. The minor facility improvements CALFED is ending up proposing will not solve the problems of the delta and therefore will leave the water supply system vulnerable to disruption, as it is currently. "it is very discouraging to hear this news. MPC, along with our agriculture and urban colleagues, have worked hard to meaningfully participate in the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. We have been told all along that this was a science and technically based process which would search for the "best" balanced solution for the environment, water quality, and water supply. "It now appears that we have been misled. It has turned out to be a politically- based process with the most radical environmental forces in the state in charge of the outcome. The wrap up speaker at the Thursday conference expressed dismay at the failure of CALFED to live up to its commitments. He urged the conference participants to inform their elected representatives about the water needs of our communities and the failure of CALFED to meet those needs. Ultimately, we live in a democracy and the will of the people must be done. We believe that a clean environment and a prosperous economy are compatible. But the radical environmental community has EPA on their side and we need to engage our political representatives in the battle to restore balance to the process. MPC will continue to do its part to make this happen." Articles of Interest Enclosed are articles on issues of important or interest that you might not have seen. Out of the Office I will be out of the office until Tuesday, September 29. If you need assistance before I return, please call Blake Anderson at 714 593-7110 or my assistant, Jean Tappan, at 714 593-7101. Jean has my itinerary and can reach me in an emergency. Blake is in charge during my absence. Letter to the Board of Directors Page 5 September 16, 1998 If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me or Blake. 6, -; 1 Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt w:%w MAwuoem�TO TME Eonaonemnae.00c Enclosures DO v-r Orange County Sanitation Districts g°AR° `- A Do ,y rrz4 p . at r Newspaper Clippings z=50a,�,F ;�2 cU, Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register U � /1 191 Those Alice-in-Wonderland tax formulas L ewis Carroll's Alice of Won- courant or uses a car wash,he or she derland fame fell down a becomes a consumer. rabbit hole and found herself But since sanitation hoard members in a land of maknbelieve. apparently live in a land of make-be- Methinks the board mem- KA lieve,they lack this basic knowledge. Dirt of the Orange County Sanitation Thus,it's time for them to give their District t same must have fallen abdication speeches. In short,they down that same hole.They make be really do not know what they are do- lieve that businesses pay taxes. ing.And the worst of it is that these As reported recently,the board vot. bureaucrats are in charge and they im- ed IS to 3 to back a plan to increase pose their wrong ideas with the form EDWARD T. MARSHALL sewer fees for restaurants and car of a government gun. washes because these businesses use Unfortunately,it is not only the more water than homeowners. I•TBE ISSUE:Governments always seem to board members of the Orange County Board member and former chair- want to conlme people about who pays Sanitation District who have the false man Jahn Collins of Fountain Valley business tares. Idea that businesses pay taxes,it is was quoted as saying,"Homeowners - will no longer have to carry the busi- any government agency that offers to nesses on their back."The statement THE WgrtElt:Mr.Marshall.who is reared protect homeowners by making busi- is a whopper of a fib and needs to be from the Fluor Corporation,lives in[m nesses pay more. It's an impossibility exposed for the fraud that it repre- Alamhos. because only individuals pay taxes. tents. Sadly,however,this false idea is ac- _ Collins and the board it homeown- cepted by many in the public.The P Of course,o business can show a ere against businesses, e N fee of question,therefore,arises asep how creases can be put impacting the backs of "Payment"to s government m agency, such Ob i wrong idea can be accepted. just as it sM1ows payments made for Obvious) businesses without impacting the wages for their employees,or pay- Y.the blame must rest homeowner. ments to a landlord for rent,or to utiB- somewhere in our society.Perhaps one However,a simple examination of a ty companies,or tar materiels end of the first places to look would be to business operation proves that in order supplies. ask about our government schooling. for the business to survive,all imposed And just when do they get their rev- Are we taught in public schools that _ In- fees,licenses and taxes must be enue to make these all these pay- businesses do not pay taxes?No.passed through to the customers.As mentst Who else but their customers, stead we are bombarded all the time the American Institute of Economic the consumers? Customers pay for all with the false premise that corpora- Research notes in its April 27 newslet. business rests,including r pm fit for the tions are not paying their fair share. ter,"Of course,all taxes ultimately In fact,the tired old cliche,used by owner. politicians,is that we have to tax the are paid by individuals." This fact is so fundamentally true Apparently,in the make-believe businesses more In order to make life that one wonders on which planet the world of the sanever consumers. board,home- fair for the taxpayers.We hear that all p owners ere never consumers.But ev- eanite[ion board members reside.Only ery time a homeowner eats at a res- the Nine from our politicians. if one lives in the land of make-believe course,it's impossible prove can one be so lacking in comprehen- thaatt a politician is deliberately lying. Sion. Apparently, bl the We can,however,wonder if the politi- Incidentally,the plan,as reported in make-believe world of - dams are really that dense to believe the news story,will reduce rates for that businesses pay taxes.More than single family homes from about$100 the sanitation board, likely they simply are carrying on with per year to$96 per year.That's a S4 homeowners are a known falsehood because to state it decrease per year,about a penny per never consumers. But otherwise..old be to expose the entire day savings. government operation to charges of On the other hand,the board plans every time a fraud. to increase the fee on sit-down restau- The sanitation district officials may rants 743 percent,from 5320 per year homeowner eats at a need an increase in fees but they have to 52,7110 per year.And for a car wash restaurant or Uses a gone about it in a manner that perpe- it will be about a 1,DD0 percent in- trales a continuing fraud—that busi- crease—from$140 per year to$1,500 car wash, he or she nesses pay taxes.For that they should per year. becomes a consumer. abdicate. Response to "Those Alice-in-Wonderland tax formulas" By John J. Collins Member, Board of Directors and former Chairman Orange County Sanitation District Edward Marshall's Op. Ed. of Sept. 1 (Those Alice-in-Wonderland tax formulas) is a fantasy of non-facts and a thought process that rivals the Mad Hatter's. His derogatory remarks about my veracity are pejorative and inaccurate. My statement, "Homeowners will no longer have to carry the businesses on their back," is not "...a whopper of a fib..." or fraudulent. It's the truth. Let me clarify Mr. Marshall's fantasy with facts. The cost of operating the Orange County Sanitation District collection and treatment system is proportionally distributed among all users of the system based on their wastewater discharge. The resultant service charge is a fee for services provided and not a tax. Because this fee is collected annually along with the county's property tax, it is often confused as part of the property tax. The singular goal of modifying the Sanitation District's rate structure was to achieve greater fairness and equity among all users, residential, commercial and industrial. These modifications were not made arbitrarily. In fact, they were recommended by the ratepayers themselves, not "...in the make-believe world of the sanitation board..." as Mr. Marshall asserts. While the change in the rate structure will decrease- and increase- some businesses' fees, the overall impact to the Sanitation District is revenue neutral. Modifying the rate structure is a fairness issue, not an overall rate increase. I think it is important to note that the sewer service rates of the Orange County Sanitation District continue to be among the lowest in California and the country. A 36-member public participation committee, the Rate Advisory Committee, spent nearly two years studying the former rate structure. The Committee was comprised of volunteers from homeowner associations, area businesses and industry, cities and members of the public at large. More than 3,000 letters were sent to members of the business and industry communities. The National Restaurant Association was contacted for an Orange County representative, and telephone calls were made to restaurants, both large and small, asking for their participation. Yes, this was a time-consuming effort. But, getting a cross-section of ratepayers for the Rate Advisory Committee was important to the Board of Directors. - more - Page 2 The modifications to the rate structure adopted by the Sanitation District Board in August were the recommendations of the Rate Advisory Committee, who were adamant that a new structure be both equitable and ensure that all users pay their fair share. Instead of all commercial and industrial users paying the same rate per 1,000 square feet of developed property, charges are now based upon the average quantity and strength of wastewater discharged by a category of users. I suppose it is logical to conclude that because Mr. Marshall doesn't like the rate structure changes, he would prefer no change to the former structure, which allowed some businesses not to pay their fair share. This avoided "fair share" was being picked up by other businesses and homeowners. During July's public hearing on the then-proposed rate structure, the owner/operator of a fast-food restaurant argued that his sewer service charges were high enough at $59 a year. The average homeowner pays around $75 a year. Is this fair? Should the average car wash pay only $140 a year when it discharges millions of gallons of wastewater into the sewer system annually? Car washes, restaurants and all other commercial and industrial users should pay according to the amount of wastewater they generate and the strength of that wastewater. (By the way, car washes that recycle their water qualify for a significant rate adjustment.) Mr. Marshall wants to play word games with his statement that businesses don't pay for the cost of doing business—customers do. I think that's rather obvious. However, each business owner prices their product or service with careful consideration for all elements of the cost to provide that product or service and their expectation of a reasonable profit to compensate for their risk and effort. It is also interesting to note that the price of a car wash is substantially the same in L.A. County and Orange County. However, L.A. County's sanitation service charges for car wash businesses are over 7 times that of Orange County. I wonder if the 22,424 commercial and industrial entities that will receive a decrease in their sewer service charges will pass those savings on to the customer? Its not government's role to favor one business over another or over people who may choose never to patronize that business. Why should a government agency subsidize the cost of a restaurant and ask homeowners to pay that cost? They shouldn't! And, under the new rate structure they don'ti Thursday, $aplamber 3, 1996 - — cltySlde . it New sewer fee rates_ don't please everyone ; EIS IN While homeowners will see small decrease, board announced it would con- bave swknming pools and spas. 10 "°h8` a^pgrea s slier the change, more than 350 The sanitation dsblct has said in w codselgra 9 Cammunilti folbgdmFpn{Gi^ bUsllleSS and apartment complex owners will telephone protests and 54 letters it would consider individual t he altl teeffeUNunrsseess chttledu.' get an increase. were received by the district. adjustments, which is something ap�dalarea,l d�ami¢I- NbiyleM But board member John Albert Henddcker, a Huntington < kaY tyDud Ly C7ou said Waller Drake, a 3bs rt Collins said the amount of the Beach apartment complex owner, homeowner. "They're complain- business me emes depends on took advantage of. Idras�r ing about increases ... why is It the use of water-preserving Hendricker wrote a letter of ' lNMeantllgyn ibhBs.Smryrl Rbg FOUNTAIN VALLEY — The that homeowners have been car- amenities, such as a recycling complaint to the district and Ta wrnk RdshmW y y pay, tying the brunt of the user tee for tank in car washes and grease was awarded an adjustment mM Idelne watada of more of use,the more you j w ruled the Orange Count years, and these guys have been traps N restaurants. The large because his sin-unit building HdmlVw H Being graduatad g Y getting away with very minimal increases could also be paid over used significantly less services ` hdmthe llhkrlington6aadr ss Sanitationer useboard Aug. es 9 g y when sewer user lee changes Payments?"The a three-year period. than others, volwree Moor pre were approved. The changes are not aimed Mundy Duch, who owns a The $8-a-year increase has giarn�Women BarkkK a red- Under the new system,which at producing more revenue but small complex m Fountain Valley, upset many apartment owners, darn of Humingtmg Beach,was is already N place, single-family rather al making lees more believes that the rate change said David Cordero, director of appdmed Xee Prerl.dr, the residences would experience a equitable for the 495,000 affecting apartments is unfair. public affairs for the Orange Huron loan teamr bran mthe P 9 Partr^ P . Huntington Center..thug dan small fee heirrrate. BusinessesIncrease by parcels of land the Fountain 'The sanitation district always Comfy Apartmentnot thrilled Ase in t. ofseth,adedustef Edboe0. could see mph rates Increaze by Valley-haled rs sag serves, goes after Jusj based nt the fad •We're Batra", t the pesatlx agradume of ceWd more than eight to 11 times. board members said. Only that we can raise ow rent," on on increase m sewer rates,but as tar Nigh Sdiool,rerenuy re�Ned a Additionally, a an come ence i parcels would expect- said. 'That's poor justification on as takingse any e a lot action, It badrelora degree m corporate Flexes will see an average pace Increases while 35Q000 their doesn't seem likes lotofome.* cork Scaral of caromdk Boyd.:'- P 9 Pam• P Park C011MC My.n 5 tlwa increase of about$B more a year parcels would decrease, nWcl Duch added that his complex are left open to us at this time,' tt nh I. College;N.v,_Sneai per apartment trictlas said.The sanitation C d y has eight d dryer who share one Cordero said. me I.Rrtaln a 19H19%g - "The hill property owners,the trio serves Orange County washer and dryer and use lignite But he also commended the ate d Famtnln vat,aa Xlgh restaurant owners,dump millions north of the El Toro Y. scantly less sanitation services district for its willingness to make 9dmot her graduated/rom the of gallons and pay the same rate But not everyone is happy than some single-fancily rest- adjustments, saying it showed a Army Reserve M0cerlraning we sin le-famil residents do," with the decision. When the dances,width he said commonl reffeNon of ood faith. Corp&romp Challleenngs at fort j 9 Y j Y 9 KCCooqroitxmmknoµamgl—aryv,Coestlepmasla Poumaln valley has hlrad Polai Small victory in small claims, big deal to residents M � Ma Student Ad Counm... over the course of 54 months. "The ndkr9 is improper. We balked and said he'd have to 0.Mamagg,a graduate of ■Mobile home ownersXWmngton Bead.High Stliool, Inspired by who rarcese,the ed will dies,"continue b pursue legal spend because t time reading the case reported for dory with the IN sued over water Charges residents — who represented remedies," Welby said, adding because there was no lawyer Motor Ramppn 9attallanm and came away a year themselves—sued for$135 each that state law says park owners there to explain it to him. Camp Pendleton_.former and court costs. should charge the same rates for The Judged eventually ruled Huntington Beach residents later with$32.50 each. Sea Aka resident Teresa mobile homes as they would in in favor of the tenants but cut the ttrete and a Y of the who wax ako rarmamnolrhg . Reynolds said water moth for homes where people r. directly amount they were asking down NewlaM BamAre uMng oAet I-Dp t-jgti fees are normally e o month for to But utility provider. fees, s,due and$30 each for coon Peace Cap.in the I.—u "Swim' homeowners but are sub-metered $2.50 a believes resident Vugthpr proves the lees,due to missing the statute o/ thlCox a scare dCNdnau_.Des �v^� month for homeowners. housing behaves the ailing proves the limitations,Btthe Wetbywindfall said. Hun and Mn eedt were timed or mobile homeowners. residents were N the right. But the windfall does have Employees B the eads wpm named HUNTINOTON BEACH — courn, tesefardFair by orange heddrj After a yearlong legal squabble, •I'm not happy with should nil- "The judge ruled in our laved more tangible meager composed even 0 Gary fair awt rredda seven residents hoes the Sea Ake have Reynolds said. 'We should w apparently the court agreed may seem meager compared to "` Gary W of Had—puoo A. Mobile judgment Home Estates won a c wind- have gotten a t whole amount with us, regardless of what the col Reynolds s id she a mightn u of H ron of Had aiW 7 k bath fall ud ant e of$32.50 each. But It was a teaming expert- owners say,'Apemen said. Re olds said she might buy a In Hurgtln�lan Beatlt tack part j gm 9 P Y Sm 9 Y ;'.Ih du 199E aim d the Patlfk - A ruling by Judge Mason L ence." Reynolds — who is also the potted plant with her S32.50 ixenho.where da mumdes" Fenton of Westminster Superior Chuck Welby,business manage past president of the Sea Aka because she enjoys gardening. Joined to 1e0he their mmbar Small Claims Court on Aug. 7 at for the mobile home park con- Residents Corp.,the homeowners And Alleman, eagerly await- sulk._ favored the tenons in an appeal tends the owners did nothing association — said when the Ng her same of the winnings, y- by park owners,who overcharged wrong In charging the residents$5 group went to smag claims court said she'll probably treat herself them for water connection fees a month for the connection fees. without an attorney, the judge to dinner out. Sewer rates for restaurants, carwashes rise seams ruattrKAM Community Ho—me Page m AutoAccess m .:nnwr+�taamvusn:=.- -- - fir. fir,` r - toclregister etom , w�� OuhkM 00g7e Gounly; Sewer rates for restaurants r carwashes rise August 27, 1998 By JENIFER B. McKIM The Orange County Register Sewer rates for carwashes and restaurants will increase by almost tenfold— and decrease slightly T for most single-family-home owners—under a plan approved Wednesday by the Orange County Sanitation District. The board voted 18-3 to back the plan, meant to more fairly distribute service costs by increasing rates for businesses and apartment complexes, which use more water. The plan will reduce rates for most single-family homes from about $100 a year to $96. "Homeowners will no longer have to carry the businesses on their back," said John Collins, a district board member and former chairman from Fountain Valley. Of the more than 485,000 parcels served by the district, 50,000 will see an increase. More than 350,000 will see rate reductions. Apartment dwellers will see some of the smallest increases, with an average boost per unit of about $8.25 a year. An average carwash will see rates go from $140 a year to $1,500. A sit-down restaurant will see increases from $320 a year to $2,700. http://www.ocregister.com/commuruty/rates027w.shtml 8/27/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register New sewer fee rates don't please everyone ■While homeowners will see small decrease, board announced it would con- have swhoming pools and spas. sider the change, more than 350 The sanitation district has said business and apartment Complex owners will telephone protests and 54 letters it would consider Individual get an increase. were received by the district. adjustments, which is something But board member John Albert Henddcker, a Huntington LISA Cant said Walter Drake, a Tustin Collins said the amount of the Beach apartment complex owner, bixawm. homeowner. "They're complain- business increases depends on. took advantage of. Ing about increases ... why is it the use of water-preserving Henddcker wrote a letter of FOUNTAIN VALLEY — The that homeowners have been car- amenities, such as a recycling complaint to the district and more you use, the mom you pay, Mng the brunt of the user fee for tank in car washes and grease was awarded an adjustment ruled the Orange County years,and these guys have been traps in restaurants. The large because his six-unit butiding Sanitation District board Aug. 26, getting away with very minimal Increases could also be paid over used significantly less services when sewer user fee changes payments?" a three-year period. than others. were approved. The changes are not aimed Murray Duch, who owns a The $8-a-year increase has Under the new system, which at producing more revenue but small complex In Fountain Valley, upset many apartment owners, is already in place, single-family rather at making fees more believes that the rate change said David Cordero, director of residences would experience a equitable for the 485,000 affecting apartments is unfair. public affairs for the Orange small fee decrease. Businesses parcels of land the Fountain "The sanitation district always County Apartment Association. could see their rates Increase by Valley-based district serves, goes after [usj based on the fact "We're not thrilled in the more than eight to l f times. board members said. Only that we can raise our rent,"Darch increase in sewer rates,but as far Additionally, aparmrent com- 50,000 parcels would expert. said. "That's poor justification on as taking any further action, it plexes will see an average ence Increases while 350,000 their part." doesn't seem like a lot of options increase of about$8 more a year parcels would decrease, district Duch added that his complex are left open to us at this tine," per ap, ant. officials said.The sanitation dis- has eight families who share one Cordem said. "The big property owners,the trict serves Orange County washer and dryer and use signif- But he also commended the restaurant owners,dump millions north of the El Toro Y. Icandy less sanitation services district for its willingness to make of gallons and pay the same rate But not everyone is happy than some single-family rest- adjusbnents, saying it showed a we [single-family residents] do," with the decision. When the dences,which he said commonly reflection of good faith. Sep 10 99 10:4Oa XXXXX 1234 P. J. Daily Eaviroamcm Repun-Urban Sprawl Presena Oww4aalbml hnpJ/wwwnewanmdk-IiNcwmin d...e01c697beba525667b000132fd'lOpmDmc t PosFIC Fax Note 7671 �+ Back la ltightION � Cadeaaa T. Frtnu�L calow. Ca Daily Envimnmei °xx F mr Fv1 Fate REPORT No. 175 Thursday,September 10,1998 News Air Pollution Urban Sprawl Presents Growing Threat To Cities; Atlanta Leads Pack, Group Says Urban sprawl is the fastest-growing environmental problem facing cities in the United States, officials with the Sierra Club said Sept. 9,releasing a report on the 30 cities with the worst urban sprawl problems. Atlanta,which the report described as having the worst urban sprawl problem in the nation,is losing 70 acres of open space per day as a result of overdevelopment according to Cad Pope,executive director of the Sierra Club.At the same tlme.he added.residents of the Washington, D.C.,area spend an average of 71 hours per year in traffic jams,white residents in Austin,Texas,experience a 4 percent increase In traffic for every 1 percent growth in population—all because of urban sprawl. The American dream,which Pope described as a house in the suburbs with a white picket fence,is"rapidly developing into the American nightmare,'he said during a press conference in Washington, D.C.The reason for this,he added,is"poorly planned,stupid growth." Siena Club's report said urban sprawl is threatening both environmental health and quality of life on a number of fronts.One of the foremost impacts is deteriorating air and water quality, Pope said. In addition,however,residents in and around cities are facing increased traffic congestion,loss of farmland and open spaces,and increased flooding as a result of the problem, the report said. 'Sprawl-Threatened'Cities The report identified Atlanta as the"most sprawl-threatened"large city in the United States, with large defined as having a population of 1 million or more.St. Louis was the second most threatened city in this category,and Washington,D.C.,ranked third,according to Siena Club. The report identified the remaining top 10 large does threatened by urban sprawl as Cincinnati,Kansas City,Mo., Denver. Seattle.Minneapolis-St. Paul,Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and Chicago. The report also identified the five most threatened medium-sRe cities,defined as having a population between 500,000 and 1 million,and the five most threatened small cities,defined as having a population between 200,000 and 500,000. In the medium-city category, Orlando, Fla.,lopped the list followed by Austin,Texas,Las Vegas,Nev.,West Palm Beach,Fla.,and Akron, Ohio. For small cities, meanwhile,the report identified MWlen,Texas.as the small city most threatened by sprawl,followed by Raleigh,N.C., Pensacola,Fla.,Daytona Beach, Fla.,and Little Rock,Ark. In gauging sprawl,the report's authors looked at levels of traffic congestion and the growth rate in the suburbs as compared to the growth rate in the urban core of each of the cities considered,according to Pope.The report described the phenomenon='low density, automobile dependent development beyond the edge of service and employment areas." The report also ranked the top five dues in terms of population density loss between 1990 and 1996 coat seem development between 1982 and 1992.amount of time wasted in haffic 1 00 9/10A S8 .44 AM Sep 10 98 10:40a XXXXX 1234 p,2 Daily Environment Report-Urban SprewlPre OrpwmngTheet ht4pdvwwmwstlmdk-link.coca/awsma_-olc69] M525667b000132fd9Opm0oc t in 1 WA.and daily vehicle miles traveled per person in 1996. Kansas City,Mo..faced the most severe population density loss, according to the report.It was followed by St. Louis,Denver, Buffalo, N.Y.,and San Francisco/Oakland,Calif.As far as open space development.Fort Lauderdale was at the top of the list. Other cities that experienced significant development of open spaces included Rivemide/San Bernardino.Calif..Atlanta, Miami,and Phoenix,the report said. Residents in Riverside/San Bernardino spend the highest amount of time sitting in traffic.the Sierra Club saitl.Washington,D.C.,was second on the list,followed by San Francisco/Oakfand, Los Angeles,and Houston. Atlanta was first on the list of the lop five cities with the highest levels of daily vehicle miles traveled. It was followed by Dallas, St. Louis, Kansas City.and Cincinnati,the report said. Solving the Problem The report oullined what the Sierra Club deemed"smart growth solutions"for minimizing the - - Impact of urban sprawl,including land purchasing programs,urban growth boundaries,and using revenue collection measures to preserve open space. Many of these efforts already are under way in cities across the nation,according to the Sierra Club.For instance,Pope said,residents of Peninsula Township,in Michigan, recently voted to adopt a measure that would pay farmers to continue farming their land instead of subdividing it for development-The report also noted Marylands Smart Growth and Neighborhood Conservation Program,which sets aside$71 million to purchase agricultural and forested areas that might otherwise be developed. Other areas are taking more direct measures.A number of cites,including Portland, Ore., and Boulder,Colo.,have established urban growth boundaries that restrict development in natural areas that surround cities Other cities,meanwhile, have adopted measures designed to raise revenue for the purchase of open spaces,the report said. Residents in Austin.for instance,supported an Increase in water rates that was designed to raise revenue for the purchase of environmentally sensitive land around the city. Federal Regulations The causes of urban sprawl, however, may lie beyond the control of localities.Federal regulahons may be contributing to the problem,and may need to be reconsidered in light of their effect on urban sprawl,according to some officials.The Clean Air Act may be one of the best examples,one Environmental Protection Agency official told BNA It DEN AA-1, 1/108). Richard Wilson,former acting assistant administrator for EPA$Office of Air and Radiation, said the act lends to require more control of sources that locale in urban areas. prompting more development in outlying mass."As a result,all of our environmental programs have had a tendency to make 0 easier for people to locate in greenfield [undeveloped]saes than in brownfield sites,"he said.In light of this.EPA has launched an agencywide effort to develop a coordinated approach for dealing with environmental issues facing clues. Despite the limits of the Clean Air Act,there still Is room for improvement in the nation's cities, according to Pope. He said further controls on existing sources of air pollution will provide the emission reductions needed to allow for more growth in urban areas.*Every city has an ample Inventory"of overpolluting existing sources,he said. For more information on Sierra Club's report, The Dark Sida of the American Dream, contact the group at.Sierra Club, 408 C Sf. N.E., Washington,D.C.20002,w check the groups's website, at wwws/erratlub.mg.� By Ain Zacaroii 'n 9/10193 9%9 AM Cnn E%nmtUrWRrenbra I" C � :7/L If, �ra� ���• �yy':•�':•le�.1 Innovations in the design and use of pressure-driven membranes will help municipalities reach stringent drinking water quality standards. These nascent membrane technologies may one day become the preferred method of water treatment. Never before have our conventional water treatment processes tntion (ire).which are very low pressure processes. most effec looked as limited as they do today.Not only is there a continu- tively remove particles and microorganisms.The reverse osmosis ing decline in the quabty of our nation's water supplies:there are (ao) process most effectively desalts brackish water and seawater also higher consumer standards and increasingly stringent mea- and removes natural organic matter and svnthetic organic and sums for regulating microbiological contaminants and disinfection inorganic chemicals.The nanofiluation (NT) process softens water by-products.Traditional methods of water treatment may not be by removing calcium and magnesium ions.new sn alled nanofil. able to meet our curtent needs. ten are also effective in removing the precursors to disinfection bv- However.engineers have developed new methods of water uvat products that result from such oxidants as chlorine. ment that promise more effective solutions,as seen in recent im ova lions in pressure-driven membrane processes. Emcmirr OmoN Although membrane processes have been used successfully for Approximately 10 years ago.the use of low-pressure membranes many vears in desalting brackish water and seawater,new kinds of such as MF and a for disinfection and particle removal was only a membrane processes are now capable of treating water for a wide concept being studied or was used only on a limited basis.The range of other uses.Some of these new,robust processes promise water community foresaw the possibility of providing primary dis, to do a better job meeting our current water treatment goals than infection without the use of chemicals.Moreover.Cryprnsporidium, such conventional processes as granular media filtration,carbon a waterbome enteric pathogen responsible for several disease out- filtration and disinfection with chlorine. breaks,was gradually showing resistance to traditional disinfec- Engineers classify membranes in many different ways,including rants such as chlorine. Thus. researchers believed that greater describing them by the driving forces used for separating materials emphasis should be placed on removing organisms thmugh physi- (i.e..pressure.temperature.concentration and electrical potential). cal means as opposed to chemical means. the mechanism of separation.the stmchr a and chemical compost Membrane processes also offer other a�vanuges over convem Lion.and the construction geometry.In water treatment.the mein tional treatments.They reduce the number of unit processes in brans most widely used are broadly described as pressure driven, treatment systems for clarification and disinfection and increase Each membrane process is best suited for a particular water aenenrnuneN..mrumnunox xeeeus eexxoxv uu treatment function.For example.mimfiltration (mF) and ultrafil xouew non xaasaaaxa eaoasamn. M.xaxern...SAID V a."-oaxoua aroouua errs.unarms wxrwuunexa. 42 oass,roa.,,ssa000s oo+Mos oo.We rot stun, Can.Er.v.a,1Sr:rnnncx Iwx i I the potential for process automation and plant compactness. water permeability and chemical resistance than symmetric Designers also thought membrane plants could be much smaller membranes. than conventional plants of the same capacity and,given their mod- MF and tn,membranes are constructed in either asymmetric or ular configuration,could be easily expanded.Additionally,these symmetric configurations.A number of hydrophilic and hydrophobic plants would produce less sludge than conventional plants because polymeric materials are used in manufacturing these membranes. they wouldn't use such chemicals as coagulants or polymers. These include cellulosic polymers,polypropylene,polysulfones and Now,10 years later,many of the projected benefits of MF and tn, polyamides.The choice of material will influence contaminant rejec. have been realized.These technologies provide effec ive disinfec. lion characteristics,durability and fouling potential. lion for potable water supplies as they reduce the levels of Ciardia Membrane systems consist of membrane elements or mod- and Cryptosporidium. as well as a variety of bacteria, below ales.For potable water treatment,NF and Ro membrane modules detectable levels.MF and OF plants are now in operation throughout are commonly fabricated in a spiral configuration.An important the world.In Eumpe there are several large OF plants In the U.S., consideration of spiral elements is the design of the feed spacer. the San Jose Water Co.in Saratoga,Calif.,was the first to construct which promotes turbulence to reduce fouling. MF and OF mere a major MF plant (17.000 ms/day). A plant with 15.000 ms/day braves often use a hollow fiber geometry.This geometry does not capacity followed in Rancho Cucamonga. Calif.. and a 68.000 require extensive pretreatment because the fibers can be periodi rnVday plant is under construction in Kenosha.Wis.The largest tally backwashed. Flow in these hollow fiber systems can be plant for disinfection and particle removal.a 106.000 ms/day OF either from the inner lumen of the membrane fiber to the outside installation.is being planned in Del Rio.Tex Today,there is more (inside-out Bow) or from the outside to the inside of the fibers than 400,000 ms/day of MF and OF capacity in the U.S.,either in (Outside-in flow).Tubular NF membranes are nowjust entering the operation or in the planning stage. marketplace. The anticipated U.S. EPA Disinfectant/Disinfection By-Product MF and OF systems can be designed to operate in various Rule will lower the maximum contaminant level (MCL).for tri- process configurations. Fig. 1 shows one in which the feedwater halomethanes (riim) from 100 to 80 pg/L,and set an MCL for is pumped with a cross-Bow tangential to the membrane.The haluaaetic acids (HM) at 60 pg/L.Thus. NF and Ro membrane only pretreatment usually provided is a crude prescreening (usu- processes are receiving considerably more attenfion since they are ally 50 to 300 pm).The water that permeates the membrane is efficient at removing the precursors to these by-products. clean. The water that does not permeate is recirculated as Ro and NF membranes, in addition to r desalting brackish water and seawater,are being used to remove inorganic chemicals such as nitrates, as well as synthetic organic chemicals. NF plants have been '•�:y-�:.g; installed since the 1980s in Florida to remove color and hardness from ground. water.Today, there is 568,000 ma/day of (- installed NF and an capacity in the US. BACK ro RAsics Membrane plant design begins with the selection of the membrane,which can be organic or inorganic in composition. Mein brane manufacturers strive to formulate membranes that provide a desired permeate quality,are durable and resistant to fouling, and can be produced at a competitive cost Most commercial water treatment NF and sw au WlLttlStaMaaaYrwmmMOw OtYYMY,au.tw taaWrwwras son, Ro membranes are made up of organic poly- mers and are asymmetric.The active layer responsible for the separation process is typ ically a few micrometers thick and is sup ported on a highly permeable layer that adds 1 mechanical strength to the membrane. One type of asymmetric membrane for NF and so systems,the thin-film composite ItfU, shows great promise for potable _ water treatment These membranes genet- ally consist of an ultrathin active layer coated onto a microporous layer that, in - turn,is supported on a mechanically strong " base.m membranes typically have higher wiz RAN OURnn MOUNTAINS novrm SOURCE warn FOR tar 15,000 ryoar mnAnox Ruhr. 43 Caa.eum'rruvl3rnaraxw99 FIG. 1. CROSS-FLOW CONFIGURATION eight membrane elements; the second stage has two pressure vessels;and the final stage has one.In full-scale plants,elements are approximately 1,000 men long and have a diameter of 200 ro cl mm.Permeate is collected from each pressure vessel.The ton• ccntrale from the first stage serves as the feed to the second: concentrate from the second stage serves as the feed to the third. Consequently, each successive stage of the array P-mustO increases the total system recovery. For many groundwater applications, the pretreatment mir or liquid required for so or NP consists in adding acid or antiscalant and rgw beckMlb then passing the feed through a cartridge filter.However,for water surface waters,more extensive pretreatment is necessary.This j Ned pro- mdrculaaon my Involve conventional tremment.MF.uF.slaw sand filtration i pump screen puMp or,In wme Cases,granular activated carbon adsorption. FIG.-2. DIRECT-FLOW FILTRAUGN One innovative process configuration for surface water and •R NIP OR UP tertiary wastewater treatment involves the use of doublrmem- ' backwash waste bran systems,consisting of a low-pressure and a high-pressure ! membrane in series.This treatment is effective for both micro- bill and chemical contaminant control.The first membrane (MF or W) Is used to help prevent fouling of the second,higherprar sure membrane system (so or NF). In the Netherlands,the permeate i Heemskirk water treatment plant,which will be completed late this year, will use a 53,000 ma/day double,membrane process (CIF and WC-ao) to treat water from the Ijssel River. San Diego, our Or liquid Calif.,will also use a double,membrwe system integrated into Its raw backwash treatment train as part of an approach for purifying tertiary water teed pro, i wastewater for potable reuse.Another system uses membranes pump screen designed to be immersed in a process unit and suction instead of pressure to draw water through the membrane hallow fiber lumen. • Sulu 1 • STI EM CHECK •lam swss z Pilot testing is often a key aspect of successful membrane plant Sups 3 design.One of the mom important reasons for conducting a pilot r' ! study is to evaluate the Influence of water quality on membrane eamnietea fouling. It is critical to determine if the process is feasible for afillrati � camas° P< °" specific water source,particularly for those that exhibit signifi. j cant water quality changes an a seasonal basis. ww°°te Other reasons for pilot tests include demonstrating regula- tory compliance, identifying the most effective and appropriate concentrate and blended with additional feedwater just after the 1 processes,evaluating new membrane products and establishing preliminary filter.To control the concentration of the wilds In Ne design criteria for a full-scale plant. recirculation loop, some of the concentrate is discharged at■ I Designers can also evaluate pretreatment options by conduct. specified rate. i Ing experiments using parallel treatment trains with varying pre. ! MF and uF systems may also operate in a direct filtration coo- treatment processes but identical operating conditions.This figuration (Fig.2).with no crass-flow (or recirculation).This is 1 avoids the confounding factors in data Interpretation. such as often termed dead-end filtration.All of the prescreened feedws- changing source water quality.Designers can also verify and fine- ter passes through the membrane. Therefore, there is IN% tune chemical cleaning procedures for site-specific conditions.In 1 recovery of this water,except for the small fraction of the water pilot studies,designers are able to optimize the operating condo used to periodically backwash the system.MF and uF plants typl- tions of each individual stage of a multistage installation. tally rely on either liquid or pneumatic backwashing systems, I Most MF and ue water treatment plants use this direct flow MEMaaaNE FouuNt configuration, since It saves considerably on energy by not As membranes filter out the impurities from the water,the mem requiring recirculation.There are also capital cost savings since brans themselves become fouled (or clogged) and less effec. there is no need to purchase recirculation pumps and associated five.The fouling of membranes has been one the primary Imped. piping, invents to their more widespread application in water treatment. j RO and NF systems usually operate in a series of stages.Fig.3 Membrane systems operate in one of two modes:constant trans provides an example of a three-stage army.The first stage cos- membrane water flux(flow rate per unit membrane area)with vari sists of three pressure vessels, which usually contain four to 1 able pressure:or constant pressure with variable tansmembrane ! 44 Cvr F.aaarpn,Afrre vivx 1 WX water this.The former is the more common. Membrane fouling treatment plants using these technologies.However,a consider- occurs during an increase in transmembrane pressure to maintain able amount of research is needed in this field to achieve opti. a particular water flue or during a decrease in water flux when the mum performance, efficiency and affordability. (See sidebar.) I system is operated at constant pressure. Ideally, this research will lead to the fabrication, construction In general, membranes can be fouled by an accumulation of and operation of a high-flux, highly selective membrane that inorganic particles (for example.clays,iron.manganese and sil- resists fouling. Membrane technology will continue to see ica) and organic compounds (such as humic and fulvic acids, growth in its share of the municipal water treatment industry. w hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials, and proteins). Bacteria l can also adhere to the membranes and create a biofilm. Jamph C.Jacangelo is vice president and manager of municipal i Accurate tests to predict fouling still do not exist. However, technology and Shankarframan Chellam is senior engineer for researchers can conduct"autopsies"on fouled membranes prior Montgomery Watson Americas in Herndon,Va.R.Rhodes Tiuseell to chemical cleaning to analyze the nature and composition of it senior vice president and director of corporate development for the contamination.They can then adjust pretreatment and them- Montgomery Watson in Pasadena, Calif. ical cleaning procedures. Fouling can controlled by hydrodynamic and chemical MORE RESEARCH WILL methods. periodicis backwashing.and chemical cleaning. Other 'YI Y\ YY methods include improving pretreatment and changing opera. ���pg ��rggf.�g.�p( . r ing conditions. Membrane fouling rates are functions of the RLglg REWARDS esearehem mend to further Investigate, membrane gnra- ■■ lllon for water tremmem applications.The general areas that should be researched are summarized below, along r with the specific data needs within aeon category. BASIC SCIENCE RESEARCH NEEDS - •Bettor understanding of membrane fouling; •Characterization of membrane surfaces and composition; �Qr• •Characterization of natural organic matter(Nou) and Its Influence an m rabrarws; Impact of operational variables on membrane fouling; •Impact of geometry on particle transport, arm adsorption and bloacarmulatlon; _. .. •Development of models for fouling prediction; me nwemarsom N sseweaaae mouow ram,mom,au eaeauom •Greater understanding of precursor removal mechanisms rand moeuua,uw,aeuawm rN a saee.r1.1.11u nveranom for Was and disinfection by-products using membranes; nmM.poem courser or U.S.nemneawma.t .Development of water-specific 1contamimant-spedfle ar m- operating conditions such as water flux and recovery.Typically, braves and cleaning agents:. " reducing the operating flux and recovery will reduce fouling. _ Research shows that,for MF and uF,increasing the frequenry OPERATIONAL.RESEARCH NEEDS of backwashing also decreases the rate of fouling. Because fil •Optimization of membrane pretromment conditions; tered or raw water is used for backwashing,the net recovery of •Impact of preoildaten on membrane performance; direct-flow MF and uF systems decreases as the frequency of •Optimization of membrane cleaning methods; backwashing increases. Batter understanding of cosllbensfits of operational Improved pretreatment also reduces membrane fouling. methods; Water treatment operators have decreased MF and OF fouling •Chareclerizatlon of west residuals from membrane trezt- rates by using coagulation/flocculation/sedimentation and dis- men,plants; -; - solved air flotation pretreatment. • Treatment and disposal of waste raslduels from membrane Chemical scaling is another form of fouling that occurs in NF plants.and so plants.The thermodynamic solubility of salts such as c6 cium carbonate and calcium and barium sulfate imposes an ENGINEERING RESEARCH NEEDS - upper boundary on the system recovery.Thus, it is essential to • Better understanding of membrane system stole-up operate systems at recoveries lower than this critical value Issues; " to avoid chemical scaling,unless the water chemistry is adjusted •Development of design concepts for large-scale plants; to prevent precipitation. It is possible to increase system recov- • Integration of membranes Into conventional treatment rry by either adjusting the pH or adding an antiscalant,or both. plant design; In the coming years,we anticipate rapid progress in the tech. • Better understanding of need for and Impact of advanced nological development of membrane treatment processes. membrane pretreatment systems. together with a continuing increase in the number and size of 45 9-09-1998 12:07PM FROM K. P. LINDSTROM. INC. 1d083726168 P. 2 09/09/28 FI✓D 03:52 F" $08 527GS75 GO BNVIRONm3NTAL SVCS 1m O02 ARM MDse AELmBE Office of Information 6 Complaint Ntmv City f Comity of Honolulu BOB-323-428S FOR LBBDIATE PJtLEASE AUM= 31, 1998 Mayor 7aromy Harris today directed the Depulmwnt of Environmental Servicss to provide continuous disinfection of treated sevags at the Sand 2eland pastwatQ Treatment plant. -Even though scientists foal it is unnecessary to disinfect cm a eantinutal basis, we will arr on the sid. of caution and mow forward with continuous disinfection,• the Mayor said. The 69 million, four-year Mamma Bey study has determined that based on existing data there are no negative impacts to public health or the environment from the deep-cease cutfalls of the Band Island and Monouliuli wastewater treatment plants. 'The City and County of Honolulu is comaittad to insuring the protection of the public health and environment,- the Mayor added.' • o w ' e m I Honolulu to disinfect m m N its sewage ��waftsr q8 Sew e D sinfeedda promised lye city will routinely dlslnfcd fHDM pA(IE i1' .•. : ,. .trot hu<when kons wind eoadt- We of the permit, then we are H the ks mllllon gallons of treated hone threaten b blow the - pleased and we commend the sewage 1t dumps Into ocean week by the federal Eavlron sewage plume back to an=. mayor; Achltolf said. DUin- waters each day about 1.7 melee mental Protectlon Ageney, 7n the extent that the mayor faction will reduce virus and v oft Sand Ulan Mayor Jeremy which to ooneWvlog whhether to saying the city to committed bacteria levels In treated. Hurt,"yederdty. to renew,A pemdt that allows. to conllnuoue disinfection. swage, be said,making It leas Hants said he had dbacted the Honolulu to treat swage only throughout the life of the lflve- .likely ,to pas health risks city Deyrtunmt of Environmental to the primary instead of sec. year) permit — not jut as a should the wastewater drift savics to provide continuous dU- ondery stage before dumping If. pilot project during the first *back near sbare Intacnon,even though a Umver- effebmc - - - - - - yeah;as was Intended — we're City otlklaY did not respond L+ ; dry of Hawaii professor and the Envtmomenloltals,1 ieludins: -pleased,' saki Paul Achiloff, to questions yesterday about Fi city's wasawswr manager teeth- wthmIles. Leaal Derense Euthjuadce¢arostnrt sumuey. when the disinfection will fled at a public bearing Iasi week .Fund, had urged the city to If they mten to dUlnfect riot, how laog h will last and z that routine dielafecuon Isn't provide continuous dlemfecllon•. continuously throughout the how much It will cost needed and is a waste of money. - We will m an the We of uu- lion and taove forward with<on- _ .t sinuous dumfectiun; HUT g said �+ yesterday. N lye dlelnfsctmn lasue cmte tip m_ during a pubile bm ing held last - h i gas Sawsje,Prge S4 i at i Y2K: A race against time Pagel of 5 VM x Te p qoah Ronnrt Cal OVI"S.Up6wi 04:14 PM tr Ile Nation's Homepage COatOohrsoures Y2K: A race against time yyspmb WASHINGTON — Inside a suburban home darkened by a power outage from a summer thunderstorm, the top bureaucrat hired by President Clinton to make sure the nation's "1 wb Mass - :' computers survive past 2000 was just trying to survive the evening's muggy weather. Lightning had knocked out electricity to the neighborhood, ,r j leaving John Koskinen and his wife without air conditioning. ,'~ Inside Tech Inside, with flickering candles ' FA i s casting the only light, the Web Column Hot Sites temperature and humidity Tech News climbed. John Koskinen,chairman of the Tech Reviews President's Council on Year Answer Desk "You know," Koskinen recalls 2GOG Conversion(AP). Game Zone telling his wife, "this could be Shareware shelf what it's like on Jan. Ist, 2000." Web Potholes Web Resources With just 500 days remaining, the coming 2000 looms almost Tech Front mythically, largely because of a decision made decades ago by BUY rf NOW► computer programmers. Left uncorrected, the Year 2000 computer flaw, commonly 81OMMIM referred to as Y2K, could threaten the world's electrical grids, Hardware its financial markets, its water supplies and its air-traffic Accessories control systems. It probably won't affect the computer chips in Software your television or VCR, and your car or pickup probably will Resources start, but the traffic lights or the subway might be fouled on Index the way to work. search "Over the last 20 years, we've grown more and more reliant on Feedback information technology," said Koskinen, chairman of the What's hot President's Council on Year 2000 Conversion. "We're able to About us produce all sorts of stuff for less than we used to, but it comes Jobs at USA with a risk. Everything is interconnected." TODAY Heart of the problem T�mh The roots of the problem date back to the earliest days of the http://www.usatoday.com4ife/cyber/tecldctd294.htm 8/19/98 Y2K: A race against time Page 2 of 5 high-tech industry, when every byte of computer code counted ay state because information storage costs were super-expensive. Mostly to save money, early programmers represented each year by its last two digits rather than by all four— 1972 became 72. Trouble begins when computers try to add or subtract dates using that two-digit format and the world approaches the Year 2000, or 00. A few examples of what could go wrong if computers are not fixed in time: • A telephone call that begins just before midnight Dec. 31, 1999 and ends minutes later on Jan. 1, 2000, could be billed as a 99-year conversation. • Many ATM machines will refuse to spit out money. • A credit-card bill owed on Jan. 7, 2000, could be mistaken as 99 years past due. • Social Security computers might refuse to issue a check to a woman born in 1912 because it might appear she hasn't been born yet. • Computers that regulate the flow of electricity through power grids could become confused, producing widespread blackouts, while similar problems could disrupt telephone service and shut off water supplies. • Some coffee makers won't brew. • Even some of America's weapons systems might not work. Contrary to one popular rumor, weapons systems susceptible to the Y2K problem will turn themselves off rather than turn themselves on, explained Koskinen. 'The chances for world peace on Jan. Ist, 2000," he saidjokingly, "may be better than ever." Then again, he added, defense failures in foreign countries could cause tensions to escalate: "What happens with Russia when its warning systems go black?" Tests of computers that do all sorts ofjobs show the problem is real enough. For example, when Chrysler rolled its clocks forward to simulate 2000 at one of its Michigan assembly plants, computerized security gates wouldn't let anyone in or out. http://www.usatoday.c.omlffe/cyber/tecti/ctd294.htm 8/19/98 Y2K: A race against time Page 3 of 5 But just what will go wrong when the calendar flips to the year 2000, and whether society will face a disaster or a mere inconvenience, is anybody s guess. What happens will depend on how many computers are fixed in the next 500 days and what is controlled by those computers that aren't fired in time. Momentous task The size of the job is staggering. In the United States alone, there are 157 billion software functions that need to be checked according to Capers]ones of Software Productivity Research, a software consulting firm in Burlington, Mass. And the 30 most industrialized countries of the world have an estimated 700 billion. The larger, old mainframe computers still used by government and big corporations for many vital functions are particularly vulnerable. But the problem isn't limited to them. The electronics industry has found that some microprocessors— tiny chips used on circuit boards in everything from coffee makers to oil tankers—are susceptible and must physically be replaced. The government figures that only I%to 2% of all those chips might be faulty, but there are billions of them, and you can't tell which ones will fail without checking every one of them. "You don't know which of those chips, and you don't know where they are," said Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate's Year 2000 committee. Estimates of the cost of fixing the Y2K problem in America alone range from$40 billion to $200 billion, and worldwide estimates are as high as$600 billion. "The costs of fixing the Year 2000 problem appear to constitute the most expensive business problem in human history,"Jones said. The Securities and Exchange Commission considers Y2K so significant that, on Aug. 5, it required public companies, investment companies and state and local governments to disclose thew preparedness and contingency plans and to describe how the problem will materially affect them. While many companies, such as AT&T, and some government agencies, including the Social Security Administration, are reportedly well along in fixing their computers, others are far behind and some are just beginning to analyze the problem. http://www.usatoday.conV fe/cyber/tech/ctd294.htm 8/19/98 Y2K: A race against time Page 4 of 5 ' More than 80% of large U.S. firms are behind schedule in fixing their computer bugs, according to a survey by the Cap Gemini America consulting firm. Because industries and government agencies rely on one another to do business, those that fix their own computers still could run into trouble. For example, Social Security computers might all be working, but Social Security checks are actually issued by the Treasury Department's Financial Management Service, which is reportedly far behind on Y2K. Manufacturers could fix their computers and still be confounded by the computer problems of their suppliers. If power grids fail, even fixed computers won't work. Earlier this year, a Senate panel surveyed 10 of the nation's largest utilities serving 50 million people and found that none had a complete contingency plan for computer failure. One didn't know how many fines of computer code it had, making it impossible to know how difficult or time-consuming its Y2K problem will be to solve. Because electricity is distributed on a grid with many suppliers, a failure at any one of them could lead to widespread disruptions. Thus, the uncertainty about what will befall us 500 days from now. A range of views Arn Lord, who wrote a book about the problem and publishes a bimonthly Y2K newsletter, predicts the government will have trouble getting out Social Security checks and food stamps and warns: "If you're dependent on a check in any way, you might not get it." Alex Patelis, an associate economist at Goldman Sachs, predicts economic disruptions comparable to the trouble caused by a major natural disaster such as a hurricane— damaging but not enough to create panic or throw the country into a recession. Edward Yardeni, chief economist and global investment strategist at Deutsche Bank Securities, on the other hand, warns of the likelihood of major disruptions to the global economy. Still others, fearing economic collapse and civil disorder, are laying in supplies of ammunition, water and canned goods— preparing for Y2K as they might for a nuclear attack. http://www.usatoday.comllife/cyber/tcch/ctd294.htm 8/19/98 Y2K: A race against time Page 5 of 5 Drew Cutter, who lives in a farming community in northwestern Ohio, says his neighbors and family"are kind of pooh-poohing it."But he says he's not taking any chances. He bought a pair of 55-gallon drums to store water, and he plans to buy a generator. "You're going to have glitches that may last a day or a week," he predicts. "I don't take it, like, head-for-hills stuff. I don't get that radical, where I buy a gun, but Ijust want to be prepared. It's better to know now than, say, next summer." Koskinen, who has been criticized by some for his optimism, says the biggest danger is overreaction. "If everybody decides to take their money out of the stock market, there won't be a stock market. If a few people do it, it's not a problem. When a few million people do it, it's a self-fulfilling prophecy." "Civilization as we know it is not going to end,"Bennett says. "I'm not yet ready to build a shelter in the backyard. But it might not be a bad idea to have a little extra food and water." By The Associated Press Copyright 1998 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. buy softw Front paae, News, $poRS, Monev, Life,Weather, Marketplace OCOP RIGHT IM USA TODAY.•Eivition a Wm,"e Co.Inc. http://www.usatoday.convlife/cyber/tech/ctd294.htm 8/19/98 Los Angeles Times September 1, 1998, Tuesday, Home Edition SECTION: Part A; Page 3; Metro Desk LENGTH: 1606 words HEADLINE: CALIFORNIA AND THE WEST; LEGISLATURE OKS SOUTHLAND-BACKED WATER PROJECT; CAPITOL: ON SESSION'S LAST DAY, LAWMAKERS WEIGH PURCHASE OF HEADWATERS FOREST IN HUMBOLDT COUNTY AS PART OF BILL TO ENSURE CONTINUED COLORADO RIVER SUPPLY. BYLINE: DAN MORAIN and MAX VANZI, TIMES STAFF WRITERS DATELINE: SACRAMENTO BODY: In a significant victory for Southern California water interests, the Legislature on Monday approved a $235-million water project aimed at ensuring continued flows from the Colorado River. The state Senate then approved a measure linked to the water bill in a package deal: the $210-million purchase of the 7,500-acre Headwaters Forest in Humboldt County, the largest stand of ancient redwoods still in private hands, and a nearby 900-acre stand of redwoods known as Owl Creek. Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa (D-Los Angeles) predicted that the lower house also would follow suit and approve the Headwaters purchase later in the night. Gov. Pete Wilson late Monday endorsed the Headwaters deal--which environmentalists oppose and about which the owner, Maxxam Corp., has been noncommittal. "The governor really wants to save these trees," said Wilson spokesman Sean Walsh. In another series of significant votes, the Senate and Assembly also approved $155 million to help struggling students and public schools, though part of the program appears to be headed for a veto by Wilson. The voting and deal-making came as lawmakers considered more than 100 bills on the last day of the legislative session. For Southern California, the big one involved water. "It's the most important vote we'll cast here," Sen. Steve Peace (D-El Cajon) said, proclaiming that the project amounts to a "fundamental shift" away from new dams, reservoirs and massive aqueducts toward conservation. The money would be used to line parts of the All-American Canal and its Coachella branch in Imperial County with concrete and to provide ground water storage along the Metropolitan Water District's aqueduct. The canal moves Colorado River water to San Diego, and water officials believe that the project is vital for Southern California's water needs. By lining what now are earthen canals with concrete, Imperial Valley farmers could conserve significant amounts of water. That would reduce demands by Southern California on water from the north. Remnant of Failed Bond Package The $235-million canal project is the remnant of a $1.7-billion bond package that failed last week. San Diego-area lawmakers led by Peace quickly fashioned legislation that focused on the canal. The MWD, as well as water interests from San Diego and Imperial counties, pitched in by hiring some of the most influential firms in town to push for its passage. Among the lobbyists were several former legislators and ex-aides to Wilson. "Whatever we lose in water we come north for," said Raymond Corley Jr., the main lobbyist for the MWD. Chris Frahm, chairwoman of the San Diego County Water Authority, hailed the vote as "tremendously important for California," and said San Diego will enjoy "a secure source of water for the first time in our history." The measure was opposed by some conservatives, who viewed it as too costly, and some liberals, among them Sen. Tom Hayden (D-Los Angeles), who cited opposition from environmentalists. Several Northern California lawmakers supported it, although it had no direct benefits for their districts. They said, however, that they will come calling later, seeking Southern California support for their various proposals for bigger reservoirs, flood control projects, even the long-stalled Auburn Dam in their part of the state. San Diego-area lawmakers insisted that they gave no assurances to Northern California legislators, though Assemblywoman Denise Ducheny (D-San Diego) said they would "get our undying love." Under a compact with other states and the federal government, California is allocated 4.4 million acre-feet of water each year from the Colorado River. In recent years, however, the state has drawn 800,000 acre feet above that amount. Other Western states that depend on the Colorado have been demanding that California reduce its take. U.S. Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt has threatened to order a mandatory reduction unless California takes steps on its own. If the canal is lined, less water will find its way to the Salton Sea, already a distressed body of water that has had mass die-offs of fish and birds. The bill includes money to study ways of reviving the Salton Sea. Pay Raise Talks Continue The water vote came as lawmakers rushed to finish work before adjourning for the year at midnight. In an example of political horse trading, supporters tied their support of the water project to the legislation turning Headwaters into a redwood park. Sen. Byron Sher (D-Stanford), who helped negotiate the purchase, said it will provide protection for the forest and for endangered species that depend on it. Maxxam representatives could not be reached Monday. But Sher said the company had agreed to the terms. The state's $210 million, combined with $250 million from the federal government, would leave the firm$460 million richer and relieve it of the hassle of fending off years of litigation and protests from environmentalists over logging. Sen. Mike Thompson (D-St. Helena), who represents Humboldt County where the redwood stands are located, added that the deal would permit Maxxam subsidiary Pacific Lumber to continue logging on 200,000 other acres it owns, and predicted that the purchase would "end decades of debate" over Headwaters. Shortly after the vote, however, a protester shouted from the gallery above the Senate chambers that the deal amounted to "extortion." "I'm sure the struggle will go on," said Hayden, one of only five senators who opposed the purchase. He charged that the $460-million price tag will enrich Maxxam chairman Charles Hurwitz, the focus of much of the protesters' anger. Even as the legislative session drew to a close, there was talk of more deals. Union leaders representing state workers continued to seek a pay raise, without success. In exchange for agreeing to a pay raise, Wilson, in his final year in office, was angling for up to $10 million from the Legislature to pay for 40 new judges, whom he would appoint. • eWa � .' GO ie n ex 60 ASECTIoN . 7" . �" ` _ "� You've got better things to do than radial a busy number. on y,Augusts, 1999 CAPITOL JOURNAL A Water War h Brewing in the Legislature By GEORGE SKELTON ACRAMENTO—A big water deal went down last week for Southern California. It was historic and unprecedented and maybe some other superlatives. Ignoring all the jargon and spin,this is what happened: San Diego city folks wanted to buy surplus water from Imperial Valley farmers. They agreed on a price. But the only way to deliver the purchase was through an aqueduct owned by the Metropolitan Water District. San Diego and the MWD couldn't agree on a delivery price. So they "compromised." They agreed to hit up everybody else in California for money to make the deal work. That's right. Some truck driver in Fresno,a teacher in San Jose and a grocer in Redding will be asked to kick in so rich fanners around El Centro can peddle water to San Diego developers. This isn't the way the deal is being sold to the public by its powerful promoters,including Gov. Pete Wilson, the former mayor of San Diego.Nor is it actually the way the deal is structured. But it's the bottom line. You need to know that—and the promoters should be honest about it—in order to decide whether this,indeed, is something everybody really ought to help pay for. And it may well be. rrr This is how the deal was structured at the suggestion of the Wilson administration in hopes it would go down easy with the public: State bond money will be used to line the All-American and Coachella canals with concrete—now they're dirt—and install underground storage facilities.The$235-million cost,not coincidentally, is the same amount that separated the MWD and the San Diego County Water Authority in their bitter negotiations. It would have been politically unrealistic to give money to the MWD to help pay for the water delivery. Instead, the state offered to finance future MWD conservation projects. So right off,this is a good deal for Southern California. r MWD ratepayers—I 6-million people in 27 water agencies—are spared$235 million in conservation costs. r Water will be used more efficiently in the Imperial Valley, http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000075023.hW 8/17/98 and not just because of the 100,000 acre-feet saved annually by the new conservation projects.The 200,000 acre-feet San Diego will buy from the Imperial Irrigation District is water that farmers must save through conservation while still growing crops.They'll turn a 10%profit on what they invest in conservation,according to BD General Manager Michael Clinton. They'll become water ranchers. * San Diego is guaranteed a steady stream of water. "We got a wake-up call during the drought," notes Christine Frahm,the water authority chairwoman.The MWD,San Diego's lone supplier,had threatened to cut its supply in half. OK,but what about people living north of the Tehachapi? What's in it for them?Here,the explanation gets abstract and fuzzy. It boils down to We're all one big family.Help one,help all. Specifically: * There'll be less Southland demand for northern water. But says one skeptic, state Sen. Mike Thompson(D-St.Helena), "I think they have an insatiable thirst for water." * This will show the impatient feds that California is trying to live within its legal entitlement to 4.4-million acre-feet per year from the Colorado River. California has been drawing 5.2 million and is being threatened with cutbacks. The San Diego deal is part of a state plan to take less water from the Colorado. * The deal may point the way toward further big transfers of water from farms to cities. "No one will prosper or triumph through water wars," Wilson asserts. "We will make progress together or none at all." * * * Well,there'll certainly be a war in the Legislature over whether to insert this$235-million deal-maker into a$1.5- billion water bond being proposed for the November ballot. Also to be financed by that bond are delta environmental restoration,flood control and many local projects.The deadline to put the measure on the ballot is only 10 days off. The deal has powerful allies, including Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa(D-Los Angeles),two sharp lawmakers who led final negotiations—Sen. Steve Peace (D-El Cajon)and Assemblyman Bob Hertzberg(D-Sherman Oaks)—and the water committee chairmen, Sen. Jim Costa(D-Fresno)and Assemblyman Michael Machado(D-Linden). But already 21 unconvinced legislators have sent their leaders a letter questioning the deal. "Without details to ensure that [state] funding is only used to line canals,how can we be sure the money is not being used to line pockets instead?" they asked. Indeed,we'll need to know more. That means straight talk, not spin.For starters, let's call the state money what it is: a subsidy--a word(and policy)long accepted in water development. gConvrieht 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved O Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT.WATER RIGHTS.SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY WATER—SOUTHERN http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000075023.htmi 8/17/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings // �e of Paper Se tion I Page # Date Subject Z ec Uj Ocean Runoff: A Priority ach year, the accounts of beach closings America, the company that owned and char- in Orange County follow a familiar pat- tered the tanker, which ran over its anchor off tern.Sewage spills caused by heavy rains Huntington Beach, agreed to pay more than or urban runoff render our waters unfit for $9 million in compensation. It also spent swimming. But while the cycle of cause and $12 million to repair damage and pay those who effect is predictable,we seem not to be learning lost money. Some of the settlement money all that much from our experience. Rather, as went to restoring and creating habitat. the current decade has marched on, the It was a big story with dramatic conse- number of closings has gone in the wrong quences that painted a vivid image for the direction:seven closures in 1993,17 in 1994,and public. But education on how day-to-day 22 each in 1995 and 1996. choices for waste disposal affect the ocean is Then last year, the number went off the equally important. charts.The county has 319 closings,contribut- In the case of Allan Creek, a long-term plan ing to making California the state having the to minimize the effects of runoff has been under most in the nation. Is a cycle that discussion by the U.S.Army Corps renders a coastline off-limits and - - of Engineers. Under a short-term therefore indistinguishable from - _ solution, a dam will result in the the nation's heartland simply a ::a, collection of water to be pumped matter to be regretted and ac- miles offshore.Unfortunately, this cepted? While some urban runoff '-�: ._ is only one trouble spot. Overall, and damage from aging infraitruc- - "` there is a need along the coast for ture may be unavoidable, there is -. better drainage systems to avoid much we can do. - - sending all the runoff into the sea. Some problems are simply the _' Whatever is done at the state, result of aging infrastructure or mt . county and local levels, much of the need to spend more on better the initiative has to come from facilities. In 1996, a pump station -'" ordinary citizens. Some volunteer failure spilled a whopping 440,000 groups like the Surfriders have gallons of sewage into the ocean at shown the way. Allan Creek. At a location where Ordinary citizens have taken closings had become all too com- weekend days out on occasion to mon,that spill was stunning for its participate in annual beach clean- size and damage. Wader isn't deterred by ups.These friends of the shoreline But too much of the time, the beach contamination. have shown the way for the rest of problem is the result not of me- us,even if their actions succeed in chanical failure but of our own carelessness. a temporary beach cleanup and in briefly Continued growth has meant that more of the raising awareness. trappings of a motorized society have found The public needs to think continually about their way into storm drains and flood channels. its habits for disposing of waste. We need to This includes fertilizer for lawns, grease from adopt environmentally friendly methods of restaurants and cars, pesticides, and dust and cleaning up oil spills and of cleaning up around waste from construction sites. That material restaurants.Homeowners now can even choose ends up in the ocean. new driveways that absorb more runoff. Ocean pollution is not a new problem. This is really about raising consciousness of However,as population has grown,state Water our proximity to the ocean,and of our respon- and Coastal Commission officials only recently sibility to be its protectors. began to educate the public and formulate a In Orange County, where the sea is our strategy to deal with runoff. Better late than neighbor and our special resource, we have a never trustee relationship. Preserving the ocean for In dramatic pollution cases, such as the our children, for the sea life in the tidal pools American Trader tanker spill in 1990,the cause they visit, for our visitors and for future is easily identifiable. In that instance, BP generations is an obligation shared by all. S..o .ndws 2'... 1 • ie ter D D C . i 5 -- h".'� �,� �..`. 3�'—a�.� �.r moo.. ��a •tee zx a 1 As the Earth's population _- i`grows:(nearly 6 billion today, = it.may double by 2050), the �r / demand for water is increasing rti( l'� Y even faster. Unless solutions ==— /�'M "amfound, the resultcuuil be l its of famine and some arts of the e world—even war. A.ReparL Ry Paul Simon 4 Ina new book, Tapped 1 1.... IrU.S.Senabradd tY ' AtIjssifle 4 r s It alm x:• i c Y 17 - - y , 71 n Paul Simon.a forma rwn-ream G.S. demv;i of ele'vleatandin and courage. a e. Will They Go To War Over Water Public Illinois,now heads the ing vision,undemanding and courage. Tw� Public Poll,., ve si y. h reSoueem h is t I exaggeration to say that the Twenty-two countries around the world are dependant an the flow Illinois Gnimselft.where he continues conflict between humanity's growing of water from other friction for much of their supply,a se.Among Importance issues and the thirst and the titer cad supply of tus-he ey which can h the to to friction,escalating tensionsve worse.Among Importance to ourrfarian and the able,potable water could result in the the areas with the potential for armetl then cc over water are: world.77re following article—adapted most devastating natural disaster since India,clear explM 9ananal other these the vol face facInsitor of over nuclear water when anal other ound sou Add the volatile lector of form hi,,,,. book. "Tapped welcome unless has been recorded happens accurately, how to share wafer when Underground l f r nu are diminishing in all be published P bled,,s month Fv a an issue a The something happens t slop it. three natiofR aM you have the potential for nuclear conflict Rainould haveSen.. US implications The w.9 billipula.on TM Middle Foes water Hthe or homeldhareewhere ithe coming dome in the next50 to _ l oneSam I Jordin. that'wafer came or home and elsewhere:the coming double in the next SOm � _ tone laws Yhat'coule tlriva worldwide cater shortage. 90 years,depending on - _ the nations of this region to whose examines you ac- war." Their shvae—one Y THE GIFT OF WATER ttI.Ourrenewable wa- sampt,E�aT shrinking—water supply will P lead to greater cooperation You nourish and sustain ter supply,however.is or to war.kraal's Prime Man, US and all Using things:' consent.Compounding — [step Netanyahu observes: These aR the words used those grim realities is �yj 'Israel is headed toward in the baptismal ale in Lu- the fact that per capita mass in water."Or worse. theran services.But in our water consumption is _ /+- Egjpf It'sAlmosttotal- wmid.increasing mothers rising twice as fast as - - ly dependant on the Nil%AnG of people cannot assume they will be the world's population. _ 85%of that river's water homes from Ethiopia.What yeam.aedandsussorcat Wntinpfew Youin not have under. _ - ucv.r; :c EAu - happens when Ethiopia's portions will�explode ofe on as hicpm an Einstein Use head population doubles which it pontons will explode on us—rimless lenti that we arc headed toward a po- will,i ntl Ethiopians 300 l more and more waface aroused citizens in this and other lmamas ¢ntial cnaminv. China—More than much large cities atreetly lace carious water Nmrtagea It will get much warca How will The worl8s Ivgert tlic• B Y P A U L S I M 0 N tutorship responep COVER PHOTOGRAPH BY EDDIEADAMS ra.a ,wwsr...lace.pueeE aasarmE Wally ew N'D of Gambia.whom the expensive m modify for majun cno- storms: F gm - eers Lox Angelmr Penn describes as-the stimption purposes seawater t•the eau u.e wmld's foremost specialist on cities:' •Calij mia. Like most of the world. Ilarupm 1 says bluntly:-Id the poor 50 veers.no. California has water in abundance where wilt Crude r r eons have Fade 10 war over oil.In the People are not in abundance.Three- this er•ms— the next 50.we are going to go to war fourths of its snow and rein fall in the too,—it m. X. Over water.The crisis pail is going to northern part of the sate.where one- situ ttw. ° be 15 to 20 years from now." third of the people live.Every official aoino,lr.'"r, Nations fight over oil.but valuable as California water plan Projects a huge se"ooiuIppls c it is.them are sumtimun for oil.Therein gap between need and supply. no substitute for water.We die quickly Cakforrum s petulance will grew without water,and no nations leaders tram 31 million today to son e. - would hesitate mboWeforadequmewe. where between 48 million and 60 MI supplies.A decade aeo.U.S.Inmlh- million in less than 40 years. Renee services identified 10 potential Symbolic ofCalifonua'sprob. Ai ; - "It is no exaggeration to say that the 0oshpoins where war could break out lcrosis the story of Owens lake. COnfllDt between hnmanityrs groWtng mtloverwelt 1 no loner have access to Etdy in this century.Ins Angeles- thattypeofinfonotsince)cavin£the arcawaterxuthontlesunderstoodthirst and the projected supply of Senate.but I know the number is higher that Nev as theusable water could result in disaster." d face problems hidav and will be much higher a decade population grew, so they pur. —Paul Simon from now.At least 400 million people chased the Hurd-largest body of I've m regions wuhsevemove- The Worid's Growing Thirst What You Can Do ter shonages. By 2050,nearly half of the wield will have insufficient water.A.n ich as - There are no magical solutions to our water By the year 42%could he facing either water stress(having less than 900 ubic mete, shortages but simple, undramatic steps often 2050.it will be available Per person)or scarcity(less than MOO cubic meters sin make a huge difference in solving big pr 4 billion. per pe,onl. Items Her",are smc small things you can do to Put There are 1995 WORLD POPULATION:S.T Wide 2050 WORLD PONUDION:9.4 billion - rho loous on water issues in your community: more than 200 1Y W _ • Write to your House member and to your river basins in Senators urging that greater emphasis and the world that more appropriations be made for finding lesa- are sharedbyu .�' 18% - expensive Ways to desalinate seawater. least two r:oun- Sbn�tnL •Write a letter to the editor of your newapa- 'q��...a.eery.a ^ per on water ise neu mes.Mom than _. Seardly 3% •Ask your library to have a display of books on a dozen nations xwr:xar Y- xb water,ask library officials to encourage sill- get moat of -- -'}e-�- �'m- ��0° wr4r•u•lerlw•reNels - amen to make porters their water from rivers that cross the bor- _.. _ �p /r = • Suggest that your church, synagogue or ders Of Mtghlam ngcWnble,,ohlchcan - - � �,,.� l'�, 2 macros discussion group focusna on the wa- beviewrdm"dieEenwhennation. .Ff /air ter issue at one of Its meetngs rT •Let me know what you ere dotng.l ran sorem aeonthebustoflemt like Canudaned �s ♦: �' 'a;yl the woad to othees Waite Paul Simon Public direr S.,there art serious disaemewe i 1%� .s 1 �!'./'2;;;yyya��fnpppy---,,, i r Policy Institute.Dept.P.Southern Illinois Uni- overwatershaingisties.Whileweand t ys.x ..h�P fr IJ ? 'f veratty.Carbondale,IN 629014429. ourmNtem neighbornanageourprob Tq a Iemswuhoutrcsamng toanm.w1bacan s r x t+"': � .`�� d Department of Water and Power final- hat will happen in the Middle East .'B+'3.. fr f� • TEaas to ly agreed to begin a pmject ensure where thereon,no water surplusesanda �•..`y :4 t t ttmterntn than Om air around the lake me<¢federal where the relationships between coon- _ .•G^ r i.i awn. health vundardv by 2006.The lake will viessa art shimmy, t 0Is cam not be refilled,but 10 square miles may Although water sufficiency problems 1 tenon sops be covered with a few inches of water are not.only as sewn,in the United i!" were r+vVen to hold down the dust according to a Sums as to most nations.three of the Ir odrouil r on..w lax Anec/n 7imn repo,. fmmst-Fmwing stems—California, heat •tch-de.In some ways.Florida's pmb Texan and Ronda—feel the squeeze on water N We sum.Owem lake.Today duds for air pollution.The Envimn- lems are similar to California's: shon- watcrsupplicsanit swill face malar it is called Owens Dry Lake.because mental Protection Agency n,..this sea ages.despite water aiitsdumstep(ade- Jlificuhio. As of 1996.five of the 10 L.A.has sucked it dry. But the ston the most pillared in the nation for dust salbuuon process is in use,but ifs in its Iastest-growing sties in the U.S.an,in does not end there. When the wind paiticles.PeoplemAearownes Los An- infancy):mushrooming population.with those sates.It is significant that all three blows on a dry it.,particulate crane, geles to fill the lake again,but cm off, a larger me of growth than California's states.like many pans of the globe with from arc"lake'is sent into Nr an to the cials.sav that would require lO percent of but a much smaller body of land:and senoussbowgrs,have in thendouatio, point Nat in some places.it is 20 times their water.something day emmt afford. problems with drainage and imgation. hues amounts of water that still are ten as high as the maximum safety sun- lust last month. the Los Angeles continued wllapr aumens 1UW6T .,roe. -moos RUMMIMIG DRY/confined creased twice as fast as the population.As has bs- Florida developed a plan in 1995 for the sons five we- come painfully apparent Nis year.Texas has aegreater _ ter-management districts.The foreword a the plan IlkcIlliad of suffering severe drought than must oN- at summsrisssthe situation:"In many areas of the state, er states.As of July,rainfall was m least l0 inches be- in Sanibel the prospects for new...inexpensive.clean sources of low normal for the year in east Texas and 4 inches to water no longer exist."The report notes Nat there sue 10 inches below normal in used of the test of the state. 'both quality end quantity problems."It adds.4Ninety On July 23.President Clinton decWedTexas a federal with—�Ictad perx:ut of the seta's population depends on grand. disaster area conwrvirse water.and the groundwater is highly susceptible to These ate not the only states to experience water contamination fmm..muoicipal ImndfiBs.leaking n- diRculfies.Virginia North Carolina Iowa,Okla- detgmand storage tanks.by edicas waste dumps,sop- home.New York and N ichign sm just a few of the tic tanks and agricultural pesticides:' other sores with ongoing problems. - aT ar.Pan of the problem in Texas,as in many oth- What can be done to solve the water shorage? erplacecs,is the huge disparity in rainfall statewide.El Obviously.it's a nmplex and difficult issue.Once Paso normally gets about 8 inches ofrain a yea,while we musterthe political will to focus on it these broad _ the nationol Ne stag along the Louisian border rt- auras should be addressed: ceives 56 inches.Aquifers(undvgmmd watersourcm) 11 CONSERVATiOIL Conserving what we have is an im- are being depleted.From 1930 to 1980.water use in. modiste step we can take. TO CONSERVE NATURAL 1 CES Tfils P URSE is 1 IRRIGATED TREATEDNT "While water problems are not as severe in the U.S. as they are in most nations, three of our fastest-growing states soon will face major difficulties." —Paul Simon II DMAIOIATNIN.Efforts to convert seawater to us- able wamr are still in theiritdarcy.These efforts must be supported,and more must be begun. 31 POLLUTION AND OYFRPoPIIIATION.Both are big contributors to water shortages. a .WwreAlressrdwl'raevvdW 'b Peula,m M1vPu& atone conch b,wdeaar Aalm Paa(axe", IWater Ls We _. More Ilan TD%of the hurrun body consists of water.It fakes lea then a 1%deficiency In oer body's water to make are thirsty.A 5% deficit carton a slight lever.An 8%shortage case^--the glands to stop producing olive j and the skm to tun this.A person argot we& j with a 10%deficiency,aced a n%deficiency brings death. [hated Nations authoribee rate that 9500 tlaldren We every day tram lack of water err, more frequently, from disaases caused by polluted water. oacza .ucus+va.,eee ran,ma waazrs LAGUNA BEACH DANA POINT The Local Agency Formation The Lotal Agency Formation Commission voted Wednesday Commission on Wednesday to establish Laguna Beach voted to make South Coast Water District as a subsid- Water District the successor lacy district of the city by agency to coordinate con- Nov. 1,2000. As pan of the solidation of the water dis- decision,South Laguna tracts in the city: Capistrano Beach will be extricated Beach Water District, Dane from the South Coast Water Point Sanitary District and District on July 1,1999,and South Coast.South Coast's eventually made part of application was chosen for L B%VD.This more unites all now.and the commission of Laguna Beach order one said it will review in Sep- water district. tember 1999 the city's pro- —Msyrav Saw posal to take over water and (90)eSa-lass sanitation services. —panels Kaiser 1949)454-13" WASTEWATER DIGEST Georgia Law Will Force Some POTWs to Privatize According to oxen state legislation effective Jan. 1, 1999, large publicly owned treatment works (POTWS) in Georgia that repeatedly violate permit limits will be forced to privatize. According to Georgia House Bill 1163,a POTiY with a discharge of 20 mgd (75.7 MIJd) or greater cannot violate biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, ammonia, or phosphorus limits during any 8 months of a 12-month period or vio- late any of these limits by a factor of 1.4 during any 4 months of a 12-month period. If a POT.V exceeds these limits, it must privatize operations for 10 to 50 years within 1 year of receiving notification from the Environmental Protection Division (EPD) of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Furthermore, the bill says that if a POTW has three major facility, by- passe during any 12-month period,excluding collection system overflows and permit-authorized bypasses, it also must privatize. 4 ppaa.Forum Aug,Wn9r Costly Lapse in Oversight Page I of 1 lNews co �co ' ' ORANGE.'COYNTY COMMENTARY .—�-�-XfiLP"j �.. y,August 2b. 1106 ORANGE COUNTY PERSPECTIVE Costly Lapse in Oversight PREV STORY c ublic agencies should have learned from the Orange NEXT STORY County bankruptcy and a series of thefts and embezzlements in recent years the importance of financial oversight.Apparently no one passed the message on RELATED to the Irvine Ranch Water District. O.C.SECTIONS East week,Irvine police said a former water district employee has been accused of approving payments to three NEWS BY contractors for rebates on water conservation equipment that COMMUNITY was never installed.The contractors allegedly kicked back to SPORTS the employee about half of the more than$2 million in payments. PREP SPORTS As disturbing as the amount is the time it took to detect the BUSINESS payments:more than 2 1/2 years.Officials at other special districts around the county said the most basic checks and LIFE& STYLE balances would have detected problems sooner. Orange County's 1994 bankruptcy did not result from theft CALENDAR but from investments that were too risky. Still, appointed and CALENDAR elected officials did not keep as close an eye on the treasurer's WEEKEND office as they should have. Seven years ago,a maintenance officer in the city of Orange HOME DESIGN was convicted of misappropriating public fiords.The nerd year, a top official of the Newport-Mesa Unified School District was COMMENTARY convicted of stealing$3.5 million over seven years.After the T v TIMES Orange and Newport-Mesa incidents and the county's bankruptcy, agencies that lost money instituted stronger controls. Irvine Ranch Water District lost$70 million in the county's bankruptcy.It should have taken a closer look at its operations then.The district says it now has imposed stricter controls to guard against theft It is not asking too much to demand that public agencies check and double-check expenditures in order to catch embezzlements before they go on for 2 12 years. Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Timm.All Rights Reserved b Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. PREV STORY EWa r GO 1 n e% GO http://www.latimes.comfHOMEINE W S/ORANGE/COMNIENT/t000077710.1.html 826/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register Metf .3 S�d9�9g 19W D EmlDezzlemen IRVINE An arraignment and pretrial hearing for four men accused of embezzling more than$2 million from the Irvine Ranch Water District was postponed Friday.Wayne Smith,a former contracts administrator for the dis. trict,will be arraigned Wednesday.Three land- nape consultants—ac- cused of conspiring with Smith—will also be present Wednesday for a pretrial IRVINE hearing at Orange County The Irvine Ranch Water District Harbor Superior Court in board Monday unanimously ac. Newport Beach.Earlier this cepted the resignation of week, the agency's board General Manager Ron president,Darryl Miller,is- Young,effective Sept.28. sued a statement saying the Young's departure mmes a district accepts "responsi. few weeks after police ac- bility for these sad events" cased a district employee and assured customers that and three private landsmpe the agency will work to en- consultants of embezzling sure that fraud won't hap- $2.2 million through a water pen again. mnservation program. — Nancy Wnal(714)56"756 Board president Darryl Miller said Young has been a key leader in the agency's success,and denied that Young's departure was re- lated to the scandal. "It was Ron's choice,"Miller said. Arthur Bmingtun, who served as the district's gen- eral manager from 1979-87, was appointed interim gen- eral manager. —Nancy t&nd(71a)56"756 Merrill Settles SEC Charges for $2 Million News - co ne Intlex Fa --SEE RANGE:COUNTY NE9V§. ];4-- Tuesday, August 25, 1998 Merrill Settles SEC Charges for$2 Million By SCOTTRECKARD, Times Staff Writer PREY STORy errill Lynch& Co. agreed Monday to pay Nie a federal regulators $2 million to settle ure' �rr NEXT siORY charges the giant Wall Street firm misled investors as Orange County careened toward bankruptcy. RELATED The Securities and Exchange Commission accused Merrill, O.C. SECnONS which had sold volatile securities to the county, of failing to give adequate warning to buyers of the county's municipal bonds about MAIN PAGE the risks the county treasury was running. The SEC said it is one of the largest settlements of a negligence NEWS BY ease in history. But critics said Merrill should have been charged C010dUtat7Y with intentional fraud or recklessness, adding that the brokerage SPORTS got off lightly. The SEC case includes no charges against individuals such as PREP SPORTS the salesman on the county account,Michael G. Stamenson, who BUSINESS called himself a "Master of the Universe" at maximizing profits to himself and the firth. LIFE&STYLE Merrill didn't admit or deny guilt in settling with the SEC. The deal brings its total payments to S451 million in the financial fiasco. CALENDAR The S2 million will go to the federal government, not WEEUND CALENDAR bankruptcy victims. However, Orange County has done well in recovering losses, recouping $739 million so far from legal, HOME DESIGN financial and accounting firths. That's nearly half of the $1.64 billion lost when former Treasurer Robert L. Citron's bets on low COMMENTARY interest rates came up losers. TV,TRv1ES The SEC, which polices the nation's stock and bond markets, didn't address whether investments provided by Merrill were too risky for taxpayer dollars. That was the central charge in civil lawsuits Merrill previously settled out of court. . Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: MERRILL LYNCH&CO INC.BROKERAGE FIRMS.ORANGE COl1NTY http://www.metahoflywood.com/HONF—INEWS/ORANGF/topstory.htn l 8/25/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Sec tion Page# Date Subject Orange County Register ! I. 9/2$19 1EWS 8 The Orange County Register STATE Friday, Aug. 28. 1998 Water bond measure is doomed as talks fail 30VERNMENT: Wilson surfaced Thursday shortly be- flco4 closeddcor talks between, signs for parks, while envhor4 The bond also would have fl- 'R-Irvine."That's an agreement Ifld L,,..eletars fall (0. fore the midnight cedllne 1. legislative leaders end rM1e gover- mentalists opposed spending nanced S235 million in improve that should have been a no- prove o measure end place It on nor took place. money to facilitate a water- eventual.ng MWD's earthen eq- "niner." Lgree Oil tems for a the Nov.J built. The bond has been In the works transfer agreement In Southern ueduct the,brings Colorado Rlv- Ne blamed the"arrogance and for 1g months, but most of the California Involving San Diego er water to Southern California. Intransigence" of the powerful fnont act lit improve- The Assemblyman waistband proposal by details have been hammered out and Imperial counties and the The canals would have been Los Angeles-based MWD,which nLnt b Assemblymen Mike Mochoda' in the past 18 boom. A tang- Metropolitan Water District. lined with concrete, preventing distributes much of Southern Ma"^ D-Linden,cleared the Senate Ap- awaited copy of the bond finally wasteful seepage, and water- California's water.' ysgINNE1 WA prapdatlons Committee In the was made public as the commit- ThebondwouldheveOraWded storage facilities would have he Amnesic Prep earlly evening and was sent to the lee met money for water projects been built, Feoure to get the bond on the SACRAAIRNTO—Just hours Senate Ilcor on a 9-3 vote. The throughout the state. Including ballot deals a major setback to SACRmidnighl deadline,Gov. measure wauld have required Wilson said he apposed the Slag million for a safe drinking- The money is the linchpin of an Southern California, where we. late Wilson and legislative lead. two-thirds votes of both houses bond because It offered lade; water program.$189 million for agreement between warring wa. ter agencies are trying to reduce •rs failed to agree Thursday on a and Wilson's signature to sur- quote provisions for water arm- flood protection and SW million ter agencies, their reliance on the Colorado M1IIIIon water bond Ilea[ In.money age. for programs to clean, recycle "Why do we need a bond for River through an Innovative we- ; :1.67 1.67 money to end a bitter While the bill languished on the Some lawmakers urged provl- and coonerve water. that?'asked Sun.Ross Johnson, ter-transfer agreement. ;omhern California water or. "It's over. It's gone. It hay- ,ened five minutes mgo," sold Ivan Walsh.a spokesman for the tepublican governor. "There votes ptanning for future water reeds for cities, factories and arms. Therefore we have no teal tonight." When asked if the closed-door elks could he resuscitated, .Valsh said,"No. It's dead." The bond, along with a pro- rased companion parka bond, Santa Margarita Water Board Cutting Rates Again Page I of I ORANGE COUNTY NEWS H6LPJ Tuesday, September 1, 1996 Santa Margarita Water Board Cutting Rates Again By CHRIS CEBALLOS, Times Staff Writer PREY STORY esidents in eastern Mission Viejo and unincorporated NEXT STORY ©I communities to the south can expect yet another decrease in their water rates, beginning Oct. 1. The Santa Margarita Water District board of directors voted RELATED for the third year in a row to lower prices,approving a U.C. SECTIONS $186,000 residential rate decrease for 1998-99. Residents Will soon be paying$1.43 per unit,or 748 MAIN PAGE gallons, down from$1.50 last year. Customers probably will NEWS BY not notice the 7-cent reduction in their monthly bill since the COMMUNITY average household only uses about 120 gallons each month. Although the Metropolitan Water District, which supplies SPORTS water to the SMWD, has been increasing its rates for a number PREP SPORTS of years, the local agency does not expect a rate increase for its customers until 2003. BUSINESS John Schatz,the district's general manager, said technological advances and reductions in staff have saved LIFE&STYLE customers about$1.3 million since 1996. CALENDAR The Santa Margarita Water District serves about 80,000 customers in eastern Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, CALENDAR Coto de Caza and areas east of San Juan Capistrano and San WEEKEND Clemente. HOME DESIGN Copyright 1998 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved COMMENTARY T.V.TIMES Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: SANTA MARGARITA WATER DISTRICT WATER--ORANGE COUNTY,UTILITY RATES.You will not be charged to look for stories, only to retrieve one. ewe - oo ne ncex o0 http://www.latimes.comtHOME/NEWS/ORANGE/t000079487.1.html 9/l/98 Legislature OKs Southland-Backed Water Project Pace I of 4 ews � co ie n ex � co t • �- A SECTION HELP:I i.� 1 1 I • ' � 1 ' Tuesday, beptem er 1, 1998 Legislature OKs Southland-Backed Water Project ■Capitol: On session's last day, lawmakers weigh purchase of Headwaters Forest in Humboldt County as part of bill to ensure continued Colorado River supply. By DAN MORAIN MAX VANZ! Timer Staff Writers ACRAMENTO--In a significant victory for SouthernCalifornia water interests,the Legislature on Monday approved a$235-million water project aimed at ensuring continued flows from the Colorado River. The state Senate then approved a measure linked to the water bill in a package deal: the$210-million purchase of the 7,500-acre Headwaters Forest in Humboldt County,the largest stand of ancient redwoods still in private hands, and a nearby 900-acre stand of redwoods known as Owl Creek. Assembly Speaker Antonio V illaraigosa(D-Los Angeles)predicted that the lower house also would follow suit and approve the Headwaters purchase later in the night. Gov. Pete Wilson late Monday endorsed the Headwaters deal—which environmentalists oppose and about which the owner,Maxxam Corp.,has been noncommittal. "The governor really wants to save these trees," said Wilson spokesman Sean Walsh. In another series of significant votes,the Senate and Assembly also approved $155 million to help struggling students and public schools,though part of the program appears to be headed for a veto by Wilson. The voting and deal-making came as lawmakers considered more than 100 bills on the last day of the legislative session. For Southern California, the big one involved water. "It's the most important vote we'll cast here," Sen. Steve Peace(D-El Cajon)said, proclaiming that the project amounts to a"fundamental shift" away from new dams, reservoirs and massive aqueducts toward conservation. The money would be used to line parts of the All-American Canal and is Coachella branch in Imperial County with concrete and to provide ground water storage along the Metropolitan Water District's aqueduct. The canal moves Colorado River water to San Diego,and water officials believe that the project is vital for Southern California's water needs. By lining what now are earthen canals with concrete, Imperial Valley farmers could conserve significant amounts of water.That would reduce demands by Southern California on http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000079565.htm1 9/I/98 Legislature OKs Southland-Backed Water Project Page 2 of 4 water from the north. Remnant of Failed Bond Package The$235-million canal project is the remnant of a$1.7- billion bond package that failed last week. San Diego-area lawmakers led by Peace quickly fashioned legislation that focused on the canal. The MWD,as well as water interests from San Diego and Imperial counties,pitched in by hiring some of the most influential firms in town to push for its passage. Among the lobbyists were several former legislators and ex-aides to Wilson. "Whatever we lose [in water] we come north for,"said Raymond Corley Jr.,the main lobbyist for the MWD. Chris Frahm,chairwoman of the San Diego County Water Authority,hailed the vote as "tremendously important for California," and said San Diego will enjoy"a secure source of water for the first time in our history." The measure was opposed by some conservatives,who viewed it as too costly,and some liberals,among them Sm. Tom Hayden(D-Los Angeles),who cited opposition from environmentalists. Several Northern California lawmakers supported it, although it had no direct benefits for their districts. They said, however,that they will come calling later,seeking Southern California support for their various proposals for bigger reservoirs, flood control projects,even the long-stalled Auburn Dam in their part of the state. San Diego-area lawmakers insisted that they gave no assurances to Northern California legislators,though Assemblywoman Denise Ducheny(D-San Diego)said they would "get our undying love." Under a compact with other states and the federal government, California is allocated 4.4 million acre-feet of water each year from the Colorado River.In recent years, however,the state has drawn 800,000 acre feet above that amount. Other Western states that depend on the Colorado have been demanding that California reduce its take.U.S.Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt has threatened to order a mandatory reduction unless California takes steps on its own. If the canal is lined,less water will find its way to the Salton Sea,already a distressed body of water that has had mass die- offs of fish and birds. The bill includes money to study ways of reviving the Salton Sea Pay Raise Talks Continue The water vote came as lawmakers oohed to finish work before adjourning for the year at midnight In an example of political horse trading,supporters tied their support of the water project to the legislation turning Headwaters into a redwood park. Sen.Byron Sher(D-Stanford),who helped negotiate the purchase,said it will provide protection for the forest and for endangered species that depend on it. Maxxam representatives could not be reached Monday.But Sher said the company had agreed to the terms.The states http://www.iatimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000079565.html 9/l/98 Legislature OKs Southland-Backed Water Project Page 3 of 4 ' $210 million,combined with$250 million from the federal government,would leave the firm$460 million richer and relieve it of the hassle of fending off years of litigation and protests from environmentalists over logging. Sen. Mike Thompson(D-St Helena),who represents Humboldt County where the redwood stands are located,added that the deal would permit Maxxam subsidiary Pacific Lumber to continue logging on 200,000 other acres it owns,and predicted that the purchase would"end decades of debate" over Headwaters. Shortly after the vote,however,a protester shouted from the gallery above the Senate chambers that the deal amounted to "extortion." "I'm sure the struggle will go on," said Hayden,one of only five senators who opposed the purchase. He charged that the $460-million price tag will enrich Maxxam chairman Charles Hurwitz,the focus of much of the protesters'anger. Even as the legislative session drew to a close,there was talk of more deals.Union leaders representing state workers continued to seek a pay raise,without success. In exchange for agreeing to a pay raise, Wilson, in his final year in office,was angling for up to$10 million from the Legislature to pay for 40 new judges,whom he would appoint. Education Bill Counterproposals On the education bills,lawmakers approved a school accountability bill by Sen. Tim Leslie(R-Tahoe City)that would spend $50 million to attempt to reform up to 250 unspecified low-achieving schools by holding them accountable for academic improvement of students. However,schools could choose whether to participate in the program.As a result, Wilson opposed it as "toothless." Wilson offered counterproposals that call for investing the State Board of Education with new power to deal with low- performing schools. Wilson also would allow parents to pull children out of the schools,make it easier to dissolve school districts by joining them with adjacent districts,and waive teacher union roles on overtime to allow teachers,if willing,to put in longer hours teaching slow learners. One bill that was approved would end automatic promotion of poor-performing students to the next grade by requiring them to repeat grades or by giving them after-school and summer school instruction. In a related measure,the Assembly sent to Wilson a package of bills that substantially increase retirement benefits for public school teachers who stay on the job. One measure,AB 1002, by Assemblyman Wally Knox(D-Los Angeles),would extend higher benefits to teachers with 30 years experience and would give them cash credit for unused sick leave. Among other actions: * The Senate gave final approval on a 23-15 vote to a bill, SB 1500,by Sen.Richard G.Polanco(D-Los Angeles)that would ban the sale of handguns that fail two basic safety tests. The tests would require that the guns not fire when dropped from a distance of about 3 feet,and that in normal use they would fire 20 times without a misfire. Wilson has been critical http:/twww,iatimes.com/HOMM74EWS/ASECTION/t000079565.html 9/1/98 Legislature OKs Southland-Backed Water Project Page 4 of 4 of the measure. * In legislation inspired by a student's school science project,the Legislature gave final approval to a bill that authorizes county sealers of weights and measures to check the accuracy of parking meters. * The Legislature sent the governor bills arranging for independent investigations of prisons and increasing guard training.The office of inspector general in the Youth�and Adult Correctional Agency would become an independent office. * Legislation to move the California presidential primary from June to the first Tuesday in March won narrow,approval and was sent to Wilson,who probably will veto it. * The Senate approved a bill authorizing the state to make a $9.1-million settlement with the city of Portola,Plumas County and various business adversely affected by the state's poisoning of Lake Davis to rid it of the voracious northern pike. For many lawmakers,27 of whom are being turned out because of term limits, Monday was bittersweet. Sen. Ralph - Dills(D-El Segundo), first elected during the Great Depression,gave a rare display of emotion, saying a final thank you to his colleagues. When another termed-cut senator asked the 88-year-old Dills which group of lawmakers was the best, Dills demurred with an assertion that he had managed to survive 50 years in public life without making a personal enemy. Sen. Diane Watson(D-Los Angeles)also was in her final session. When one of her bills came up,a measure dealing with state funding of food stamps, Sen.Jim Bmlte(R-Rancho Cucamonga)spoke out against it,telling his colleagues that there would be "very few opportunities left for Republicans to vote against a Watson bill." Times staff writers Carl Ingram and Tony Perry in San Diego contributed to this story. Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times.All Rights Reserved I Search the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories about: LEGISLATION—CALIFORNIA,WATER—SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,HEADWATERS FOREST ENVIRONMENT— NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA—POLITICS WATER RIGHTS.You will not be charged to look for stories,only to retrieve one. ews .x cc e n ex W co http://www.latimes.com/HOME/NEWS/ASECTION/t000079565.html 9/1198 y Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING AUGUST 26, 1998 oJ� ANrr�r� y 2 � � � 9 o a F�,T,NQ TH I�NV� V, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 OCSD.P.O.Be.8127.Fountain Valley,CA 927284127.(714)962-2411 Minutes for Board Meeting 08/26/98 Page 2 of 7 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, was held on August 26, 1998, at 6:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Bumie Dunlap, Chair Glenn Parker X Peer Swan, Vice Chair Darryl Miller a Steve Anderson John Holmberg X Don Bankhead Jan Flory X George Brown Shawn Boyd X John Collins Laurann Cook X Jan Debay John E. Noyes X Barry Denes Richard A. Freschi X Brian Donahue Harry Dotson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner a Mark Leyes Bruce Broadwater Patsy Marshall X Jack Mauller X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Eva Miner-Bradford Paul F.Walker X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Margie Rice James V. Evans X Thomas R. Saltarelf Jim Potts Christina Shea X Barry Hammond a William G. Steiner Todd Spitzer a Dave Sullivan Tom Hannan X Charles E. Sylvia Ron Bates X Bob Zemel Tom Daly STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager; Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager; Jean Tappan, Board Secretary pro tem; Bob Ghirelli; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Mike Peterman; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Chris Cervellone; Jim Herberg; Mike Moore OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Mark Kemple; Ray Littrell; Toby Weissert; Sue Whittaker Minutes for Board Meeting 08/26/98 Page 3 of 7 APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARY PRO TEM In the absence of Board Secretary Penny Kyle, Chair Burnie Dunlap appointed Jean Tappan as Secretary pro tem. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the City of Huntington Beach re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: Active Director Alternate Director Dave Sullivan Tom Hannan PUBLIC COMMENTS Ray Littrell, public citizen, spoke to the Directors regarding his concern that some local government offices were not being assessed sewer service charges, and the issue N equity for restaurants, whether they are located in shopping centers or are free-standing. Mark Kemple, attorney for Crow-Winthrop Development Limited Partnership, spoke to the Directors regarding his interpretation of requirements of Proposition 218 and how he felt it was not properly applied toward the implementation of proposed Ordinance No. OCSD-05. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: That the Board of Directors adopt a Resolution of Commendation expressing appreciation to outgoing Director Shirley Dettloff for her contribution and dedication to public service upon her retirement from the District. REPORT OF THE CHAIR The Chair advised Directors that he would be appointing three Directors to the Guidance Committee which was being formed for the Cooperative Projects Program. He requested interested Directors to contact him. Chair Dunlap thanked the 22 Directors that attended the August 22, 1998 Board Workshop. He then announced that the next Board Workshop will be held on December 5, 1998. Director Anna Piercy was then appointed by Chair Dunlap to serve on the OMTS Committee. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager announced that the District has received an award from the Government Financial Officers Association (GFOA)for the Certificate of Excellence in Achieving Financial Reporting for 1996-97. The GFOA also recognized Dan Dillon as the Accounting member responsible for the financial reporting effort Mr. McIntyre presented the award to Dan Dillon. The General Manager recognized Director Jan Debay, our representative on the NWRI board, and Ron Linsky, Executive Director of NWRI. Mr. Linsky gave a presentation on the organization and its mission to improve water quality, research, and advocacy throughout the word. Minutes for Board Meeting 08/26/98 Page 4 of 7 REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL In the matter of Michael McCusker v. County Sanitation Districts, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 786898, General Counsel reported that the Court denied Petitioners Petition for Write of Mandate, thus upholding the District's discipline that was imposed as a result of the drug investigation case. Absent an appeal, the matter is deemed closed. In the matter of David Ellstrom v. County Sanitation Districts, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 778093, General Counsel reported that the Court sustained the District's demurrer, without leave, with respect to the individual District employees named as Defendants. Absent an appeal, the matter is deemed dosed. In the matter of County Sanitation Districts v. PennWiilson CNG. Penn Octane Corporation, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 790409, General Counsel reported that in accordance with the negotiated settlement, the District received the settlement amount in its entirety, and this matter is now deemed closed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 29, 1998,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A," "B", "C", "D", AND"E"attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 0527/98 06/10/98 0624/98 Joint Operating Fund $1,361.095.93 $2,032,198.57 $1,596,522.68 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 186,674.96 312,367.04 177,056.85 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 2,083.33 0.00 District No. 1 0.00 0.00 5.000.00 District No. 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 District No. 3 81,446.40 00.00 243,202.94 District No. 5 0.00 0.00 35.991.00 District No.6 0.00 0.00 210.00 District No. 7 1,155.52 580.00 973.36 District No. 11 0.00 0.00 0.00 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS IL00,172M SZW228-94 $2.058.956.83 ALL DISTRICTS /07 08/98 07L22/98 Operating Fund $1,830,136.67 $3,477,082.25 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 137.011.70 350,541.92 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 2,083.33 Revenue Area 1 0.00 0.00 Revenue Area 2 210.00 75,337.98 Revenue Area 3 6,580.00 55,465.65 Revenue Area 5 17,640.20 0.00 Revenue Area 6 0.00 0.00 Revenue Area 7 0.00 926.98 Minutes for Board Meeting O8/26/98 Page 5 of 7 Revenue Area 11 0.00 2,724.00 Revenue Area 13 0.00 0.00 Revenue Area 14 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 51991,57657 13 954 162 11 CONSENT CALENDAR 9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-42, Amending Exhibit A to Resolution No. OCSO 98-12, Authorizing the District's General Manager to Establish Rules and Guidelines to Implement Board Policies and to Delegate His Authority to Staff. 10. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-43, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-8, Establishing Policies and Procedures for Selection and Procurement of Professional Engineering, Architectural, Environmental, Land Surveying and Construction Management Services; Approval of Plans and Spec'fiications; and Approval of Construction Change Orders. 11. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-44. Authorizing the District's General Manager to Purchase Rights-of-Way and Easements Costing $100,000.00 or Less for Projects Approved by the Board of Directors. 12. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-45, Authorizing General Counsel to Appear and Represent District in All Litigation Relating to Construction Stop Notice Proceedings. 13. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No.4 to Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3, with Mladen Buntioh Construction Company for an amount of$353,988, and 46 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $5,072,869. 14, MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Inland Concrete Enterprises, Inc., a corporation v. Colich Bros., Inc., at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 797490, in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1; and 2)authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. NON —CONSENT CALENDAR 16. DRAFT COMBINED STEERING/AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Burnie Dunlap, Chair of Steering Committee, re the August 26, 1998 combined meeting of Steering Committee and Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan. The Chair then ordered the draft Combined Steenng/Acl Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 29, 1998 to be filed. Minutes for Board Meeting 08/26/98 Page 6 of 7 17. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1998. 18. CONSIDERATION OF ACTIONS RE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES: MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: That adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-05, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, Continuing and Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the establishment, restructuring and approval of the sewer service charge rates and schedules by the District are for the purpose of meeting operating and maintenance expenses of the District, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits; purchasing or leasing supplies, equipment or materials; or meeting financial reserve needs and requirements; MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: That all verbal and written protests have been received and considered, including: (i) 14 persons who spoke to the Board during the public hearing, including 2 persons who each owned more than 1 parcel containing multiple family residential units, and 2 attorneys, both representing a landowner of 10 parcels (Crow-Winthrop Development, Ltd. Partnership). Objections for the total number of parcels were acknowledged and accepted; (ii) a total of 54 written protests were received; and (iii)the Staff reported it had also received approximately 350 to 400 verbal protests by telephone. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: That the total written protests against the proposed charges do not constitute a majority of owners of identified parcels, and accordingly, the District is not barred by Article XIIID, Section 4, Section 6 of the State Constitution from adopting the Ordinance establishing the charges. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: To read Ordinance No. OCSD-05 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present- MOVED, SECONDED AND CARRIED: To adopt Ordinance No. OCSD-05, Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges. AYES: Directors Bankhead, Brown, Collins, Debay, Denes, Donahue, Dunlap, Eckenrode, Ferryman, Mauller, McGuigan, Miner-Bradford, Piercy, Rice, Saltarelli, Hammond, Swan, and Sylvia NOES: Directors Gullixson, Murphy and Zemel. ABSENT: Directors Anderson, Leyes, Steiner and Sullivan. MOVED, SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: To adopt Resolution No. OCSD 98-46, Directing County Tax Collector to Collect Sewer Service Charges on 1998-99 Property Tax Bills. Minutes for Board Meeting 08/26/98 Page 7 of 7 18. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANTTO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (54956.9) (All Districts):The Board convened in dosed session at 8:12 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Item No. 19(a)(1). The Board did not consider Agenda Item No. 19(a)(2) and no report was given. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 8:35 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. � A Si� retary pro tem of ff Board of Directors 6POrange County Sanitation District H:\wp.dtalagenda\1998 Joint Board M1nutea'D82898.dm County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County -' Clalms Fold 5a7/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 11659 Dell Marketing L.P. 34,662.13 Computers 11560 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing 66.642.52 Natural Gas 11561 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. 98,043.51 Fordo Chloride M09-27-95 11562 Mike Pdich&Sons 105,273.95 Construction 3-35R-1 11663 Minded Buntich Construction Co 81,446.40 Construction 3-38.3,2-R-97 11664 Network Solutions Group 46.050.00 Consulting Services 11565 PactBcew of Ca 37.320.68 Health Insurance Premium 11568 Pima Oro Systems Inc 81,558.62 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 11567 Polydyne,Inc. 54.034.18 Callonk Polymer M0 3.11-92 Its" Boleros,Applications Ind.,Co 161,713.22 Ocean Monitoring NO 64494 11569 Tula RenchfMagan Farms 61,375.61 Residuals Removal 11570 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 79,396.84 Legal Services NO 7.26-95 11571 Sverdrup CNII,Inc. 157,947.14 Construction 7-7-1 11572 American Telephone&Telegraph 16.80 Long Distance Telephone Servlces 11573 AT&T 804.83 Long Distance Telephone Services 11574 American Totephone&Telegraph 4.89 Long Distance Telephone Services 11575 AcmStandaw 30.02 Lab Supplies 11576 Allied Pecking&Rubber Inc. 31.03 Mechanical Supplies 11s" AHa-Robbins,Inc. 171.18 Instrument Supplies 11578 American Digital Technologies, 2,578.04 On-SHe Training 11579 Amelcan National Standards In 64.00 Publications 11580 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 415.D0 Service Agreement t,. 11581 Applied Industrial Technology 116.37 Pump Supplies rT 11582 Aquatic Bloassay And Consul fin 235.00 Lab Supplies y 11583 Arrowhead Electric Corp. 156.40 Electric Supplies 11584 Ansonia&Trophlee By Bea 46.25 Plaques 11585 Aiur Environmental 2,406.28 Lab Supplies 11586 Air Products&Chemicals 37.38 Lab Supplies 11587 American Seals West 124.54 Gaskets 11588 ARMA International 200.00 Membership 11589 AWSI 542.00 D.O.T.Training Program 11590 Bailey Fischer&Porter Compon 318.52 Office Supplies 11591 Banana Blueprint.Inc. 2,371.65 Printing MO 11-7-94 11592 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 5,239.62 Telephone Installation 11593 Layne T.Barokll 252.52 Twining Expense Relmb. 11594 Battery Specialties 52.11 BaBeris,s 11595 Blackburn MFG.Co. 64.48 Service Agreement 11598 Blair-Martin Co.,Inc. 407.52 Value Manifolds 11597 Budget Janitorial,Inc. 3,605.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-1244 11598 California Automatic Gale 812.77 Service Agreement 11599 Cana Corporation 16.986.51 Fiber Optic Cable 11600 Cad Warren&Co. 272.28 Insurance Claims Administrator 11601 Cednet 20.00 Computer Services 11602 City of Fountain Valley 10,077.56 Water Use 11603 Clean Source 1,002.08 Janitorial Supplies 116M Communlcellane Performance Gro 21.835.00 Professional Services 11605 Compressor Components Of Calif 1.436.46 Pump Supplies 11606 Compusews Incorporated 130.01 Computer Services 11607 Connell GM Pads 285.28 Truck Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 5/27198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 11608 Consolidated Electrical 2,103.50 Electrical Supplies 11609 Consumers Pipe S Supply Cc 249.84 Plumbing Supplies 11610 Continental Laboratory Product 3,235.54 Lab Supplies 11611 Converse Consultants 3,588.80 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 11612 Comfoo Capital,Inc, 1,432.00 Copier Leese 11613 Corporate Express 2.156.69 Office Supplies 11614 Costa Mesa Auto Supply 86.72 Truck Paris 11615 County of Orange 1,155.52 Underground Tank Fee 11876 County Wholesale Electric Co. 4.360.72 Electrical Supplies 11617 Cummins Allison Corp. 1.013.55 Maintenance Agreement 11618 CS Company 1.402.63 Plumbing Supplies 11619 CSUS Foundation In. 21.45 Subscription 11620 Dapper Tire Co. 1.668.30 Tmck Tires 11621 DatavauM1 101.50 Of fte Back-Up Tape Storage 11622 David E.Libed,Ph.D. 625.00 Management Training 11623 Dal Mar Analytical 372.00 Biosolids Analysis 11624 Donley Technology 239.00 Professional Services 11625 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 21891 Paint Supplies 11626 DIME,Inc. 556.93 Compressor Pads 11627 Electra Bond,Inc, 862.00 Mechanical Supplies 11628 Electrical South 10.55 Equipment Repair 11629 Enchanter,Inc. 4.200.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 11630 Entek IRO international 853.39 Equipment Repair N 11631 Enterprise Tachnologles 19.405.90 Consulting Services q 11632 EMED 872.00 Safety Supplies ru 11633 ESP Indiuslries,Ina 266 36 Mechanical Supplies 11634 Fisher Scientific 2.542.90 Lab Supplies 11635 Fordo Benefits Insurance Comp 17.569.16 Long Term Disability Premium 11636 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto We 144,00 Truck Wash Tickets 11637 Fry's Electronics 1.141.36 Employee Computer Loan Program 11638 Garra9-Callahan Company 9,717.72 Ciremicals 11639 GTE California B511.16 Telephone Services 11640 George Yardley Co. 1.225,52 Lab Supplies 11641 Gerich-MBchell,Inc. 867.97 Pump Supplies 11642 Goldensest Window Service 1.658,00 Window Cleaning Service 11643 Government Institutes Inc. 141.00 Lab Supplies 11644 Grading Pacific Inc. 2.440.43 Fiberglass Grating 11645 Edwards Systems Technology 170.00 Electrical Services 11646 GST,Inc./Micro City 3.932,68 Office Supplies 11647 Hach Company 139.45 Lab Supplies 11648 Harrington Industrial Plastics 459.82 Plumbing Supplies 11649 HBti Inc 1.975.33 Tools 11650 Homo Depot 1.23558 Small Hardware 11651 Huffs Final Phase 5.750.00 Construction 11652 HWA Sales,Inc. 3,255.36 Electrical Supplies 11653 Integra Biosciences,Inc. 940.00 Lab Supplies 11654 Irvine Ranch Water Districts 265.78 Water Use 11655 Ism,Inc 948.20 Instruments 11656 IPCO Safety 6,682.00 Safety Supplies County Sanitation DWIM Of Orange County - Claims Paid 527M Check No. Vendor Amount Description 11657 ISI Infortext 11,590.38 Computers,Installation 8 Service Agreement 11658 J.D.Edwards World Solutions C 4,000.00 Software License Fees MO7-24-96 11659 James Martin 8 Co. 7,920.00 Date Integra0on Project 11660 James N.Darlington 2,800.00 Consulting Services 11661 Jays Catering 282.44 Directors Meeting Expanse 11662 Jeff Flynn B Associates 6,000.00 Consulting Services 11663 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 22,448.03 Medical lnsumnw Premium 11664 Kaplan 899.00 Training Registration 11655 Kefth D Slolzenbach,PH.D. 2.100.00 Ocean Monitoring 11666 Kelly Paper 124.17 Paper 11667 Knox Industrial Supplies 2,454.07 Tools 11688 Lab Safety Supply,lnc, 2,501.55 Safety Supplies 11669 Lab Support 1,494.00 Temporary Employment Services 11670 LwerAn Corp. 548.13 Service Agreement 11671 MBD Machining 725.00 Maintenance Services 11672 Maintenance Technology Corp. 2,040.27 Welding Supplies 11673 Mar Vac Electronics 41.48 Instrument Supplies 11674 Matt Cher Inc. 894.49 Ferric Chlodtle Supplies 11675 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 98.75 Tools 71676 Mec Analytical System 2.340.00 Professional Services 116n Medlin Controls Co. 329.98 Instrument Supplies 11678 Mesa Muffler 93.36 Track Supplies y. 11679 Micro Security Devices,Inc. 11.296.15 Safety Supplies hT 11680 Micro Flex 1,350.00 Safety Supplies 0v 11681 MicroAge Computer 10,744.83 Software w 11682 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co 3,741.36 Mechanical Repairs 11683 Minnesota Western 552.11 Lab Supplies 11684 Minion Unform Service 4,353.13 Uniform Rentals 11685 Mitchell Instrument Co. 275.00 Instruments 11686 Mitchell Repair information Co 705.41 Subscription 11687 Monitor Labs Inc 295.25 Instruments 11688 MotoPhoto 62.46 Photographic Services 11689 Multi W Systems.Inc. 1.244.66 Pump Supplies 11690 MGD Technologies,Inc. 1,000.00 Maintenance Agreement 11691 MPS Photographic Services, Inc 98.60 Photographic Services 11692 Mine Safety Appliances Company 119.48 Safety Supplies 11693 National Institute of Standard 1,600.00 Lab Supplies 11694 National Plant Services,Inc. 5.745.00 Vacuum Track Services 11695 Neal Supply Co 341.57 Plumbing Supplies 11696 Nirkey Petroleum Co Inc 2.713.32 Lubricant/Dieset Fuel 11697 The Norco Companies 123.80 Mail Delivery Service 11698 Once Depot Business Services 1.854.10 Office Supplies 11699 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. 2.520.00 Temporary Employment Services 11700 Orange County Foram 160.00 Conference Registration 11701 Orange County Wholesale Electr 863.94 Instrument Supplies 11702 Orange Valve 8 Ffttlng Company 1.679.00 Fittings 11703 Oxygen Service Company 3,092.48 Specialty Gases 11704 01 Analytical 218.04 Lab Supplies 11706 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 1.150.85 Eleclrlcel Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid SQ7/98 Chad No. Vendor Amount Descdpllon 11706 Pacific Bell 1,290.65 Telephone Services 11707 Pacific Mechanical Supply 444.61 Plumbing Supplies 1170E Pacific Parts and Controls,In 559.11 Instrument Supplies 11709 Padgett-Thompson 155.00 Seminar Registration 11710 Padre Janitorial Supplies 212.14 Janitorial Supplies 11711 Pagenet 1,347.19 Rental Equipment 11712 Paul Cockrell,Photography 1,620.72 Photographic Services, 11713 Pave West 21,500.00 Construction Services Job#1961000 11714 Performance Training Associate 790.00 Training Registration 11715 Petro Animal Supplies 157.74 Lab Supplies 11716 Pholomn U.S-A.,Inc. 208.12 Lab Supplies 11717 Pump Engineering 8dor Quality 2.548.65 Pump Supplies 11710 PCs Express 194.25 Courier Services 11719 Quasi Software 2,547.13 Software License&Maintenance Agreement 11T20 RECG 44.00 Subscription 11721 Rellaslar 10,778.22 Life Insurance Premlum 11722 Remedy 6,125.17 Temporary Employment Services 11723 Roherfo's Auto Tdm Shop 265.00 Auto Repair 11724 Seagate Software 12,000.00 Training Fee 11725 Second-Sun 1.783.47 Light Futures 11726 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc. 341.99 Tools 11727 Shurelurk Sales&Engineering 1,778.64 ToolsMamware 11728 SkillPath Seminars 99.00 On-She Training 11729 South Coast Water 10.00 Lab Supplies 11730 Southern Calhomla Merino Ins 985.00 Rental Equipment 11731 Sparkletts 1.792.41 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 11732 Sprint 30.60 Long Distance Telephone Service 11733 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 373.57 Management Agreement 11734 Summit Steel 4,430.84 Metal 11735 Super Power Products 177.79 Janitorial Supplies 11730 SKPWest Inc. $89.20 Safety Supplies 11737 Taylor-Dunn 157.09 Electric Cart Pads 11739 The Register 823.20 Notices&Ads 11739 Tony s Lock&Safe Service&S 104.78 Loden&Keys 11740 Transcat 845.53 Instrument Supplies 11741 Tried Personnel Services,Inc. 6,000.00 Temporary Employment Services 11742 Tmesdall Laboratories,Inc 4.286.00 Lab Services 11743 Uhra Scientific 262.00 Lab Supplies 11744 United Parcel Service 296.08 Parcel Services 11745 Velcom 13.451.14 Software 11746 Valley Chles Supply Company 2,389.54 Plumbing Supplies 11747 The Vantage Group 14,161.00 Consulting Services 11746 Vemes Plumbing 4,442.47 Plumbing Supplies 11749 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 7,873.40 Vision Service Premium 11750 VWR Scientl0c Products 18,583.14 Lab Supplies 11751 The Wackenhut Corporation 23,829.65 Security Guards 11752 Water Environment Research Feu 645.00 Subscription 11753 The Welch Company 103.44 Subscription 11754 West Coast Safety Supply Co. 520.79 Electrical Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 5/27198 Check No. Veneer Amount Description 11755 Masses Varec,Inc. 20,761.19 Valves 11756 William Hamilton B Associates/ 450.00 Consulting Senior 11757 Wdeg Scientific 1,043.45 Lab Supplies 11758 WS Da0dy 6 Company 2,761.09 Safety Supplies 11759 Xerox Corporation 15,979.18 Copier Leases 11760 James E.Colston 1.105.26 Training Expense Reimb. 11761 Douglas I.Cook 176.52 Meeting Expense Reimb. 11762 James R.Davidson 363.00 Training Expense Reimb, 11763 W.Doug Hauser 378.74 Meeting Expense Reimb. 11764 Dean R.Karels 256.67 Training Expense Reimb. 11765 John Kavoklis 221.49 Training Expense Reimb. 11766 Gregory R.Mathews 128.68 Meeting Expense Reimb. 11767 James McCann 217.00 Training Expense Reimb. 11768 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 741.48 Petty Cash Relish. 11769 William F.Piercer 304.25 Training Expense Reimb. 11770 DavkI Rodriguez 110.00 Training Expense Reimb. 117T1 Yvonne L.Schwab 108.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 11772 Michelle Tuchman 39.91 Cellular Phone Expense Reimb. 11773 County of Orange 570.00 Underground Tank Fee 11774 Robert F.Driver Associates 21.719.00 Property Insurance MO 6-10-92 1,630,372.81 Q r r* Y County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 5127/98 Summary Amount District No. 3 $81,446.40 District No. 7 $1,155.52 CORF $186,674.96 Operating Fund $1,361,095.93 $1,630,372.81 r r* Y m County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 6/10198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 11827 Advanco ConslnMore Inc 74.020.00 Construction J-34-1,P2-35-5 11828 Blo Gro Division 87.058.26 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 11829 County Sanitation Districts of 25.942.40 Worker's Comp.Relmb. 11830 Dell Marketing L.P. 36.777.25 Computers 11831 Delta Dental 38.088.53 Dental Insurance Plan 11832 Duke Energy Trading&Marketin 52,954.55 Natural Gas 11833 Global Engineering&Managemen 34,720.00 Consulting Services I1834 James Martin B Co. 67,159.70 Strategic Information Architecture 11835 Kemiron Pacific,Inc 68.124.17 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 11836 Margate Construction Inc 463,963.56 Construction PI-36-2 11837 Orange County Water District 150,65D.99 GWRS Consulting Service POC9804 11838 PaineWebber Incorporated 60,186.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 11839 Pima Gro Systems Inc 53,241.48 Residuals Removal NO 3-29-95 11840 Polydyne,Inc. 76.798.07 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 11841 Science Applications Ind.,Cc 122,477.56 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 11842 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 68.427.62 Residuals Removal 11843 United HeaithCare I Meta Heal 128,286.15 Medical Health Insurance lie" Vulcan Chemical Technologies 56,706.26 Hydrogen Peroxide Spec.No:C-044 11845 AT&T 8.02 Long Distance Telephone Services 111146 Adamson Industries 1,271.77 Lab Supplies 11847 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 24,603.55 Manhole Frames&Covers 11848 Aka-Robbins,Inc 317.78 Instrument Supplies N, 11849 American Airlines 3,080.50 Travel Services rt 11850 American Computer Hardware 5,559.45 Computer Hardware b1 11851 American Digital Technologies, 10,520.76 On-She Training �. 11852 Analytical Products Group.Inc 261.00 Lab Supplies 11853 Anicom,Inc. 1,148.53 Electrical Pans 11854 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. 215.00 Service Agreement 11855 Apploona Employment Service 2.587.50 Temporary Employment Services 11856 Applied Industrial Technology 850.32 Pump Supplies 11857 Applied Tech 3.103.20 Publications 11858 Agent Communications Group 349.15 Subscription 11859 Arta Disposal Service,Inc. 620.80 Toxic Waste,Removal 11560 Asbury Environmental Services 3D0.00 Waste Oil Removal 11851 Association of Card.Water Ag 20.00 Subscription 11862 Association of Energy Engineer 795.00 Meeting Registration 11863 Atlantic Pool Care 235.00 Service Agreement 71964 Air Products&Chemicals 22.892.06 0&M Agreement Oxy Gen Syst.NO 841-89 77865 OuirksaVAssodated Concrete P 151.71 Building Materials 11856 Banana Blueprint,Inc. 1.691.24 Printing MO 11-7-94 11867 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 5.436.21 Telephone Installation Ilea Battery Spedatiles 52.11 Batteries 11869 Blaze Out 176.78 Safety Services 11870 Ban Franklin Crafts(Bobeft Cr 3T7.97 Award 11871 C.P.I. 594.80 Lab Supplies 11872 C.S.U.F.Foundation 8.750.00 Professional Services 11873 CelB Centrifugal Pump 2,391.87 Electrical Services 11874 Cell.Soo of Municipal Finane 40.00 Meeting Registration 11875 California Environmental Contr 580.00 Maintenance Pans County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 6110/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 11876 California Auto Rehigeretion 1,105.85 Service Agreement 11877 California Relocation Services 354.00 Moving Services 11878 Camall Corp. 2,175,00 Service Agreement 11679 Canus Corporation 9.547.76 Fiber Optic Cable 11890 Cad WammnBCo. 1,003.27 Insurance Claims Administrator 11881 Cmmenite Ford Tmck Sales 564.38 Auto Parts 11882 Cenlrepolnte Commercial 7.701.43 Office Furniture 11883 Cerfnet 20.00 Computer Services 11884 Chain Drives Inc 1,761.56 Mechanical Supplies 11885 Chapman Counseling 8,250.W Employee Training 11886 Charles P.Crowley Co. 3,360.54 Instrument Parts 11887 Chase Manhattan Bank of Texas, 6.668,00 Trustee Services 11888 Clayton Group Services,Inc, 5,765.57 Professional Services 11809 Clean Source 200.42 Janitorial Supplies 11890 Compressor Components Of Calif 735.00 Pump Supplies 11891 Computers Amenca,Inc. 735.77 Computer Supplies 11892 Consolidated Electrical 7,788.69 Electrical Supplies 11893 Consolidated Freightways 1.371.90 Freight 11894 Consumers Pipe B Supply Cc 1,155.62 Plumbing Supplies 11895 Conbolce 20281 Mechanical Supplies 11896 Converse Consultants 2,280.41 Consulting Services MO 5-11.93 11897 Cooper Cameron Corporator, 5,196.80 Engine Supplies H. 11898 Corporate Express 2,887.59 Office Supplies N' 11899 County of Orange 525.130 Underground Tank Fee tD 11900 Creme Pro Services 2,046.50 Maintenance Agreement N 11901 Culligan Water Conditioning 30.00 Soft Water Service 11902 CCI Technologies 81520 Cable Installation 11903 CEM Corporation 601.51 Lab Supplies 11904 CRG Manne Laboratories,Inc 2.520.00 Lab Analysis 11905 CS Company 9,12T40 Plumbing Supplies 11906 Deaver Manufacturing Co. 1,165,11 Truck Supplies 11907 Diamond H Rocognition 1,518.19 Service Awards 119M Dover Elevator Company 1,203.60 Elevator Maintenance 11909 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 862.73 Paint Supplies 11910 Dyna-Med 1166.52 Safety Supplies 11911 Enchanter,Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-2495 11912 Enterprise Technologies 640.00 Consulting Services 11913 Environmental Science Assoc. 16.470.34 Strategic Plan EIR Prof.Svc. 11914 Equisery 47.30 Testing Equipment 11915 Expedan 117.92 Orange County Property Information 11916 EIMCO Process Equipment 2.379.12 Mechanical Supplies 11917 ENS Resources,Inc. 4.496.08 Professional Services 11918 ESP Indlustries,Inc. 27.37 Mechanical Supplies 11919 Federal Express Corp., 277.60 Air Freight 11920 Bailey-Ftscher B Porter Co. 2,270.92 Chlorination Supplies 11921 Fisher Scientific 2.165.41 Lab Supplies 11922 Flo-Systems,Inc. 3.597.43 Pump Supplies 11923 Forma Systems,Inc, 1,760.00 Professional Services 11924 Fountain Valley Camera 43.97 Photo Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 6110/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 11925 Foxboro Company 483.01 Instrument Supplies 11926 Franklin Covey 54177 Office Supplies 11927 I'Ts Electronics 315,58 Computer Supplies 11928 Gallade Chemical Inc. 237.27 0111 Supplies 11929 Ganahl Lumber Company 140.55 Lumber/Hardware 11930 General Petroleum 3A64.55 Unleaded Gasoline 11931 GTE California 5,507,08 Telephone Services 11932 George Yardley Co. 4,060.79 Lob Supplies 11933 WW Grainger Inc. 191.80 Compressor Supplies 11934 Graphic Distributes 469.36 Photographic Supplies 11935 Groth Corportation 785.00 Flame Amster 11936 Haaker Equipment Company 1.581.18 Track Supplies 11937 Houlaway Storage Containers 2.520.00 Container Rentals 11938 Herb's Blacklorest Bakery 8 De 83.10 Director's Meeting Expense 11939 Hoelbiger Service Inc 808.32 Compressor Parts 11940 The Holman Group 761.12 EAP Premium 11941 Hub Auto Supply 238.02 Truck Parts 11942 HIS DIgBal Ads B HB Blueprint 30.18 Photo Services 11943 Imaging Plus,Inc. 748.55 Office Supplies 11944 Industrial Air Compressor 140.74 Mechanical Parts 11945 Industrial Shoe Co. 97.37 Safety Supplies 11946 Industrial Threaded Products, 249.63 Connectors N. 11947 Interstate Battery Systems 775.04 Batteries mrt 11948 Ism.Inc 3.631.18 Instruments l 11949 ICMA 141.00 Subscription u 119W IPCO Safety-Ca 1.692.63 Safety Supplies T795i ISLUA 900.00 Meeting Registration 11952 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 4,912.29 Instrument Supplies 11953 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 15,756.53 Engineering Services 11954 Jay's Catering 217.39 Director's Meeting Expense 11955 Johnstone Supply 288.91 Electrical Supplies 11956 J2 Printing Services 264A6 Printing 11957 K.P.Llnds9om 2.750.00 Envir.Comulting Services MO 12-9-90 11958 Kelly Paper 127.50 Paper 11959 Knox Industrial Supplies 2,004.30 Tools 11%0 LA.Cellular Telephone Compan 222.17 Cellular Telephone Service 11961 Lab Safely Supply,lnc. 50.10 Safety Supplies 11962 Lab Support 1.411 Temporary Employment Services 11963 Laidlaw Env.Svcs.of Calif.. 10,608.50 Hazardous Material Disposal 11964 LaserAll Corp. 1.370.99 Service Agreement 11965 LeMotte Company 77.62 Sulfide Test Kd 11966 Leib-Nexis 1.113.87 Subscription 11967 Liquid Handling Systems 209.10 Mechanical Supplies 11968 Long Beach Uniform Co..Inc. 1,144.41 UnBorms 11969 Lord Fleming Architects,Inc 1,768.15 Architectural Services 11970 IA Cellular Telephone Company 945.56 Cellular Telephone Service 11971 Merrick 631.86 Groundskeeping Supplies 11972 Mar We Electronics 98.56 Instrument Supplies 11973 Mae Chlor Inc. 4.887.03 Ferric Chloride Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 6110198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 11974 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 201.91 Tools 11975 Medlin Controls Co. 1,657.08 Instrument Supplies 11976 Meeting Planners Plus 5,000.00 Professional Services 11977 Mellon Trust 15,790.15 Investment Custodian Bank 11978 Mesa Muller 274.89 Truck Supplies 11979 Mader,Inc 2,400.00 Consulting Servces 11980 MicroAge Computer 1.654.16 Software 11981 Midway Mfg&Machining Co 14.316.66 Mechanical Repairs 11982 Mission Uniform Service 1.880.05 Uniform Rentals 11983 Mobile Modular Management Corp 258.60 Office Trailer Lease 11984 Monitor Labs Inc 77.28 Instruments 11985 Morton 549.63 Cogan.Supplies-Sall 11986 MoloPholo 28.48 Photographic Services 11987 MGD Technologies,Inc. 1,000.00 Maintenance Agreement 11988 MPS Photographic Services,Inc 5.93 Photographic Services 11989 Mine Safety Appliances Company 107.00 Safety Supplies 11990 National Mi zocomp Services 2.045.00 Service Agreement 11991 National Technology Transfer, 8,233.00 Twining Registration 11992 New Horizons Computer Leaming 1,099.00 Software Training Classes 11993 Nic key Petroleum Co Inc 21,227.10 LubdmnVDiesel Fuel 11994 Norihemstem Carbon 1,389.55 Filters Q; 11995 Occupational Vision Services 550.61 Safety Glasses y. 119% Clsson Construction 10,800.00 Construction Job 0 P2-39-1 rt 11997 Olsten Stafing Service,Inc. 3,699.00 Temporary Employment Services In 11995 Orange County Industrial Pleat 6.838.68 Plastic Sheets ua 11999 The Orange County Register 33.34 Subscription 12000 Orange County Wholesale Electr 747.27 Instrument Supplies 12001 Orange Valve&Filling Company 290.50 Fittings 12002 Ortiz Fire Protection 754.00 Service Agreement 12003 Osteibauer Compressor 478.57 Mechanical Supplies 12004 Oxygen Service Company 2,912.74 Specialty Gases 12005 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 4,635.09 Electrical Supplies 12008 Pacific Bell 31.85 Telephone Services 12007 Pacific Mechanical Supply 387.13 Plumbing Supplies 12008 Pacific Pads and Controls,In 1.092.25 Instrument Supplies 12009 Padre Janitorial Supplies 1,118.83 Janitorial Supplies 12010 Pmkhouse Tire Inc 1.336.55 Tres 12011 Pens Unlinked 292.80 Track Supplies 12012 Patriot Video Productions 168.88 Video Taping Services 12013 Penn Slate 1,025.00 Twining Registration 12014 Permaseal 409.88 Lube Oil 12015 Pinnacle One 440.00 Seminar Registration 12016 PCk Poty-Con Industries 1,291.71 Janitorial Supplies 12017 Posftive Fi m ulaturs,Inc. 272.54 Chemicals 12018 Power Design 381.88 Electrical Repairs 12019 Power Maintenance lldematlona 856.84 Maintenance Agreement 12020 Power Pumps,Inc. 546.93 Pump Supplies 12021 Precision Backhoa 980.00 Equipment Rental 12022 Presidium Inc 2,083.33 Worker's Comp.Claims Admin. County Sanitation Distm,ts Of Orange County Claims Paid 6110/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12023 CPI 2.534.07 Lab Supplies 12024 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 985.42 Electrical Supplies 12025 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. 2,160.05 Trash Removal 12026 ReaitMe Systems Corporation 24,900.00 Integration It Support Services 12027 Rauh Marine Studies,Inc. 590.00 Ocean Monitoring 12020 Rellastar 8,272.00 Lie Insurance Premium 12029 Reporter Bankers Security 4.745.78 LBe Insurance Premium 12030 Remedy 9,354.00 Temporary Employment Services 12031 Reslek Corporation 376.64 Training Registration 12032 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop 365.00 Auto Repair 12033 RPM Electric Motors 1,512.49 Electric Motor Supplies 12034 RS Hughes Co.,Ina 255.76 Palm Supplies 12035 Satellite Glass Corp. 248.82 Auto Supplies 12036 Safety-Kleen 153.50 Service Agreement 12037 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 7,470.00 Engineering Servlces 12038 Scab Specialty Gases Inc. 1.252.50 Specialty Gases 12039 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 305.00 Lab Repairs 12040 Second-Sun 993.09 Light Fkares 12041 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 120.66 Tools 12042 Shlmadzu Scientific Instrument 205.52 Lab Supplies 12043 Sh miluck Sales&Engineering 12.414.10 ToolsfHardware 12044 Sigma Chemical Co 16.60 Lab Supplies w 12045 Smith Pipe B Supply Inc. 229.43 Plumbing Supplies 12046 Soco-Lynch Corp. 74.48 Janitorial Services Ltd 12047 Sours Coast Water 100.00 Lab Supplies Le 12M Southern CalBomla Air Cord. 700.02 Electrical Supplies 12049 Southern California Edison 6,837.45 Power 12050 So.Calif.Gas Co. 13,050.00 Natural Gas 12051 Southern Cel9omla Trans Sery 531.01 Electrical Supplies IM52 Spadkletts 2,007.55 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 12053 State Chemical Mfg.Co. 621.46 Janitorial Supplies 12054 SlaleNet 155.00 Seminar Registration 12055 New Haven Manufacturing Co. 1,355.49 Tools&Supplies 12056 Summit Steel 1.401.35 Metal 12057 Sunset Ford 684.12 Truck Supplies 12058 Super Chem Corporation 336.78 Chemicals 12059 Super Power Products 177.79 Janitorial Supplies 12060 Swains Electric Motor Service 611.63 Pump 12061 Systems Integrated 13,500.00 Professional Services 12062 SKC-West Inc. 909.89 Safety Supplies 12063 Thermo JaneO Ash Corp. 3,771.25 Training Registration 12064 Thompson Industrial Supply,In 4,631.32 Mechanical Supplies 12065 Time Werner Communications 40.47 Cable Services 12068 Tany's Loch&Safe Service 65.00 Locks It Keys 12087 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 14.400.00 Contract Greundskeeping MO 5-11-94 12068 Ursa Scientific 87.00 Lab Supplies 12069 The Unisource Corporation 6,859.37 OMce Supplies 12070 Urban Water Institute,Inc. 200.00 Membership 12071 UCLA Institute of me Environment 10,000.00 Contribution-See Grant Program County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 6H0/98 Check No. Venda, Amount Description 12072 US Equipment Co..Inc. 229.04 Valve Supplies 12073 Valcom 218.34 Software 12074 Valley Chles Supply Company 69.56 Plumbing Supplies 12075 V.C.I.-Vapor Controls,Inc. 508.43 Electrical Services 12076 VWR Scientific Products 6,845.34 Lab Supplies 12077 Waste Markets 14,726.34 Residuals Removal MO 3.27-96 12078 Water Environment Federation 44.60 Publication 12079 Waterman Industries 450.45 Hardware 12080 Waxie Sanitary Supply 30.43 Janlrodal Supplies 12081 Weather Services International 10.00 Professional Services 12082 Western Steles Chemical Inc. 23,925.00 Chemicals 12053 Whessee Varec,Inc. 931.00 Valves 12084 WESTCAS 415.00 Meeting Registration 12085 Xerox Corporation 362.04 Copier Leases 12086 Garerdo Amezoua 539.37 Training Expanse Reimb. 12087 Kelly J.Christensen 270.80 Meeting Expense Rehab. 12088 Donald F.McIntyre 1.217.06 Mewling Expense Reimb. 12089 Michael D.Moore 1,154.25 Meeting Expense Rehab. 12090 Bryant B Associates 3,000.00 Consulting Services t,f 12091 County Sanitation District of 595.50 Perry Cash Reimb. 7 12092 Charles E.Reed 912.27 Training Expense Reimb. 12093 Daniel R.Tremblay 406.64 Training Expense Rehab. H. 12094 Yu-Ll Tsai 1,133.33 Training Expense Reimb. ,t 12095 Michelle Tuchman 192.72 Meeting Expense Reimb. b1 12096 Nancy J.Wheatley 377.32 Meeting Expense Rehab. 12097 AT&T 2,946.78 Long Distance Telephone Service 2,347,228.94 Orange County Sanitation Districts Claims Paid 6/10/98 Summary Amount District No. 7 $580.00 CORF $312,367.04 Self Insurance Funds $2,083.33 Operating Fund $2,032,198.57 $2,347,228.94 Y fm' I J County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 5124t98 Check No. Vendor Amount Desulption 12134 Advance Constructars,Inc. 36,991.00 Construction J434-1,P2-356 12135 Graybar Electric Company 33,062.97 Electrical Supplies 12136 James Martin&Co. 29,127.30 Data Integration Project 12137 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. 117,851.01 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 12138 Municipal Water Diet.of Going 78,400.00 ULF Toilet Program 12139 Polydyne,Inc. 36.254.33 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 12140 Southern California Edison 45,779.46 Power 12141 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. 31,705.78 Temp.Pumps @ Maint St.Pump Station 12142 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 69.073.88 Legal Services 12143 Mladen Burtch Construction Co 242,992.94 Construction 3-38-3,2-R-97 12144 Sverdrup Civil,lac. 837,174.60 Construction 7-7A 12145 Abrasive Engineering Tool&Eq 259.46 Hardware 12146 Air Liquids America Corporelio 1,629.77 Specialty Gasses 12147 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 976.22 Manhole Frames&Covers 12148 Allied Packing&Rubber Inc. 1,186.05 Mechanical Supplies 12149 Allied Supply Co. 832.16 Plumbing Supplies 1215D American Management Associabo 395.00 Seminar ReglslmtionslSubscription 12151 Analysts,Inc. 1,658.18 Testing Kits 12152 Applied Industrial Technology 50.65 Pump Supplies 12153 Arrowhead Electric Corp. 105.43 Electric Supplies 12154 ABM Business Machines,Inc. 24.19 Office Supplies 12155 Air&Waste Management Assoc. 325.00 Meeting Registration h,. 12156 Assoc of Metro.Sewerage Agenci 450.00 Training Registration rt 12157 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY 6,300.O1) Lab Supplies f] 12158 ASO Course Registration 33.OD Subscription 12159 Baker Party Rentals 210.OD Office Supplies 12160 Bar Tech Teleam,Inc. 1,155.04 Telephone Installation 12161 Battery Specialties 228.78 Batteries 12162 Bwnanskl&Co Inc 1,260.00 Appraisal Sconces-Industrial Properties 12163 Caldune 60.81 Operation Supplies 12164 Calf Dolly&Supply 451.00 Equipment Rental 12165 Cal Protection 589.00 Inspection Services 12166 California Poster Compliance C 78.53 Publlatlons 12167 CWEA 141.55 Conference Registration 12168 Calolympic Safety 616.87 Safety Supplies 12169 CaBrol,Inc 410.79 Hardware 12170 Camper 469.05 Tools&Supplies 12171 Carrier Corporation 88.97 Publications 12172 Compressor Components Of Calif 4,978.05 Pump Supplies 12173 Compucem 830.99 Computer Supplies 12174 Consolidated Electrical Dislri 8,836.69 Electrical Supplies 12175 Consolidated Plastics Company 59.85 Toole 12176 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co 324.44 Plumbing Supplies 12177 Cooper Cameron Corporation 105.87 Engine Supplies 12178 Core Laboratories,Inc 400.O1) Soil Testing 12179 CASA 620.00 Conference Registration 12180 CEPA Company 792.00 Lab Supplies 12181 CH2MHIII 9,500.OD Englneerng Services J-31 12182 CS Company 3.635.49 Plumbing Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 6124/98 Chad No. Vendor Amount Description 12183 Dapper Tire Co. 805.31 Track Tires 12184 Thomas M.Dawes 8,416.00 Professional Consulting Services 12185 Del Mar Analytical 2,836.00 Blosollds Analysis 12186 Dell Marketing L.P. 21,246.16 Computers 12187 Or Mark Matsumoto 2.250.00 Reissue check 8315-lost 12188 Dyne-Mad 743.48 Consulting Services 12189 Earthquake Management 7,000.84 Safety Supplies 12190 EmAnalysis,Inc. 7.600.00 Consulting Services 12191 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 3.015,00 Medical Screening 12192 Emergency Management Network, 9,750.00 CPR/First Aid Training 12193 Enchanter,Inc. 4.900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 12194 Enterprise Technologies 14.505.60 Consulting Services 12195 Environmental Resources Assed 1,062.20 Lab Services 12196 Executive Excellence 199.00 Subscription 12197 EIMCO Process Equipment 991.30 Mechanical Supplies 12198 Bailey-Fischer&Foder Co. 239.72 Chlorination Supplies 12199 Fisher Scientific 1,010.65 Lab Supplies 12200 Flickinger Company 450.35 Valve 12201 Foothill Engineering&Dewater 7.500.00 Collections Contractual Services 12202 Fountain Valley Camera 46.38 Photo Supplies 12203 Foxboro Company 2.130.79 Instrument Supplies 12204 Fred Kolyzny 1.575.00 Consufting Services 12205 Franklin Covey 1,440.13 OI6ce Supplies 12206 Franklin-Miller Incorporated 18,000.00 Repair and Maintenance Service n 12207 ISCO.Inc. 1,164.73 Lab Services Iv 12208 The Gas Company 16,389.85 Natural Gas 12209 GTE California 6,920.79 Telephone Services 12210 George Yardley Co. 4,646.33 Lab Supplies 12211 W W Grainger Inc. 1,106.31 Compressor Supplies 12212 Graseby STl 4,662.86 Engine Supplies 12213 Great Pacific Equipment Co. 527.71 Cylinder Repair 12214 Great Western Sanitary Supplia 3,075.35 JanHorial Supplies 12215 Guardian Business Forms,Inc. 111.62 Pdnting Services 12216 GST,Inc./Micro City 706.58 Office Supplies 12217 Had Company 47.89 Lab Supplies 12218 Hatch&Kirk Inc. 1,443.90 Track Supplies 12219 Hilo Inc 450.13 Tools 12220 Hcerbiger Service Inc 24,082.83 Compressor Paris 12221 Idexx 2,391.61 Lab Pads and Supplies 12222 Industrial Air Compressor 1,742.19 Compressor Pads 12223 Indushial Threaded Products, 100.22 Connectors 12224 Ism,Inc 3.565.76 Instruments 12225 IPCO Safety-Ca 2,206.33 Safety Supplies 12226 J.O.Tucker and Son,Inc. 5,326.78 Instrument Supplies 12227 J.D.Edwards World Solutions C 9,055.49 Software License Fees MO 7-24-96 12228 J.P.Nissen Co 38.69 Office Supplies 12229 Jamison Enginesrng,Inc 3,300.16 Equipment Maintenance 12230 Jensen Instruments Co. 2,308.20 Gauge 12231 Johnstone Supply 539.12 Electrical Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 624I98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12232 Knox Industrial Supplies 1,975.29 Took 12233 Lord Fleming Architects,Inc 5.000.00 Architectural Services 12234 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1.195.44 Welding Supplies 12235 Maness Corporation 5.545.00 Construction Services 12236 Mankys Boiler Repair Company 695.00 Mechanical Supplies 12237 Mec Analytical System 4.810.00 Professional Services 12238 Medlin Controls Co. 2,292.3E Instrument Supplies 12239 Mager,Inc 1.800.00 Consulting Services 12240 MimmAge Computer 13,572.93 Software 12241 Midway Mfg&Machining Co 7.955.99 Mechanical Repairs 12242 Minnesota Western 781.18 Lab Supplies 12243 Mobile Hose and Hydraulic Sump 722.76 Pump Supplies 122" Monitor Labs Inc 152.23 Instruments 12245 The Monster Board 176.00 Job Posting on Internet 12245 Moody s Immature Service 5.000-00 Rating Maintenance Fees 12247 Moore Business Forms 8 Systems 2,146.D4 Omce Supplies 12248 Moreland&Associates 6D0.00 Auditing Services NO 34B 95 12249 Multi W Systems,Inc. 1,780.51 Pump Supplies 12250 Municipal Treasurem'Assuc. 218.00 Membership 12251 Min Safely Appliances Company 1,129.77 Safety Supplies IM52 National Fire Protection 273.06 Membership Renewal Fees 12253 Neal Supply Co 2,618.33 Plumbing Supplies 12254 New Horizon Computer Learning 1,590.00 Software Training Classes 12.255 NPR-FDCH,Inc. 54.90 Toxic Thies Transcripts t7 12266 Office Depot Business Services 2,912.30 Office Supplies w 12257 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 1.721.93 Electrical Supplies 12258 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,430.05 Plumbing Supplies 12259 Pacific Parts and Controls, In 1,658.40 Instrument Supplies 12260 Pedro Janitorial Supplies 106.07 Janitorial Supplies 12261 Parker Hannifin Corporation 90.23 Mechanical Supplies 12262 Parker Hannifin Corporation 8.27 Mechanics[Supplies 12263 Patric Video Productions 617.39 Video Taping Services 12264 Penn State 4,025.00 Training Registration 12265 Performance Training Associate 395.00 Training Registration 12266 Perkin-Elmer Corp. 670.02 Fillers 12287 Petm Animal Supplies 258.43 Lab Supplies 12258 Phartfalomar,Inc. 210.00 Office Supplies 12269 Pinkerton Systems Integration 13,132.72 Computer5upplies 12270 Postmaster 172.00 Post Office Box Rental 12271 Process Equipment Company 1.925.36 Pump Supplies 12272 Pryor Resources,Inc. 99.00 Training Registration 12273 Pumping Solutions Inc. 678.49 Mechanics[Supplies 12274 Realtbne Systems Corporation 1,133.75 Integmtion 8 Support Services 12215 RJN Group,Inc. 20,055.00 COONS Consulting Services 12276 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 1,208.24 Paint Supplies 12277 Santa Fe Industrial Products, 3D7.60 Plumbing Supplies 12278 Seagate Software 18,000.00 Training Fee 12279 SecerMSun 1.542.12 Light Futures 12200 Shureluck Sales B Engineering 1,077.16 ToelsMardware County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 6124/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12281 Snap-On Incorporated 1,851.27 Tools 12282 So.Calff Coastal Water Research 8,000.00 Sediment Analysis 12283 Southwest Air Balance Corp 3.800.00 Professional Services 12284 Sperling Instruments,Inc. 1,031.01 Meter 12285 Strata International, Inc. 926.90 Chemicals 12286 Summit Steel 3.794.08 Metal 12287 Syscom Inc 3.000.00 On-Site Training 12288 Tarby of Delaware Inc. 2,964.00 Pumps 12289 Thomas Gray 8 Assoc. 330,00 Lab Services 12290 Troesdail Laboratories,Inc. 745.00 Lab Services 12291 United HeanhCare/Matra Heal 18.074.36 Medical Health Insurance 12292 US Equipment Co.,Inc. 727.89 Valve Supplies 12293 Valley Cities Supply Company 4,130.68 Plumbing Supplies 12294 Valley Dairen Diesel Allison 311.54 Electrical Supplies 12295 The Vantage Group 14,651.00 Consulting Services 12296 Verve's Plumbing 2,460.00 Plumbing Supplies 12297 VWR Scientific Products 7,774.86 Lab Supplies 12298 Water Environment Federation 667.50 Professional Development Courses 12299 Waterman Industries Q520.8D Plumbing Supplies 12300 The Welch Company 47.41 Subscription 12301 Wing Sciemfie 1,763.00 Lab Supplies 12302 The Writing Company 5,000.00 Professional Consulting Sarvlces N, 12303 WEFTEC'98 2.100.00 Conference Registration N 12304 Xerox Corporation 304.94 Copier Leases n 12305 Kirk Xpedex Paper B Graphics 109.99 Photo Copying Services ,p 12306 Yellow Springs Instrument Co., 2.100.31 Lab Supplies 12307 Nicholas J.Amontes 150.00 Training Expense Reimb. 12308 Jeffrey Brown 250.00 Training Expense Reimb. 12309 Crislopher D.Dahl 516.56 Meeting Expense Reimb. 12310 Ingrid G.Hellebmnd I'M." Tmining Expense Reimb. 12311 Vladimir A.Kogan 558.37 Meeting Expanse Reimb. 12312 Edward M.Tones 734.02 Meeting Expense Reimb. 12313 Michael D.White 242.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 12314 County of Orange 270.01) Underground Tank Fee 12315 County Sanitation District of 1,296.31 Petty Cash Reimb. 12316 Foxboro Company 1,732.30 Instrument Supplies 12317 Mine Safety Appliances Company 321.76 Safety Supplies 2,058,968.83 Orange County Sanitation Districts Claims Paid 6/24/98 Summary Amount District No. 1 $5.000.00 District No.3 $243,202.94 District No.5 $35,991.00 District No.6 $210.00 District No. 7 $973.36 CORF $177,056.85 Operating Fund $1,596,522.68 $2,058.956.83 r• r* n County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 71M8 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12470 Blo Gm Division 11 70,749.39 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 12471 Delta Dental 38,678.15 Dental Insurance Plan 12472 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers 79,521.51 Engineering Services 237 12473 National Water Research Institute 50,000.00 Grant Settlement 12474 Ossen Construction 31.905.00 Construction P2-39-1 12475 Orange County Water District 37,987.20 Consulting Services PDC98-04 12476 Pacificator of Cellf. 34.025.48 Health Insurance Premium 12477 Pima Gra Systems Inc. 53.699.39 Residuals Removal MO 7-29-95 12478 Southern Calif Coastal Water Resource 340,940.00 Membership 12479 Southern California Edson 58,167.17 Power 12480 Systems Integrated 44,970.30 Professional Services 12481 Tule Ranch ltvagan Farm 43,915.35 Residuals Removal 12482 United HealthCam I Metro Heath 128,310.D4 Medical Health Insurance 12483 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 29,465.28 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C4144 12484 Margate Construction Inc. 303,976.18 Construction P1-36-2 12485 AT&T 4,259.74 Long Distance Telephone Services 12486 Ammar,Telephone&Telegraph 0.80 Long Distance Telephone Services 12487 A&D Tronia 66.93 Electrical Supplies 12485 Aldw Systems,Inc. 17,093.00 Engine Supplies 12489 Aladdin House 3DI7 Window Blinds 12490 Allied Supply Co. 1,485.64 Plumbing Supplies 12491 Allis Engineering Co. 14.691.00 Professional Services r•. 12492 Ahnega Enlrommenlal 4.960.00 Professional Services r< 12493 American Sigma,Inc. 236.21 Mechanical Supplies O 12494 Applwne Employment Service 2,075.87 Temporary Employment Services t: 12495 ACT Group Inc. 300.00 Service Agmemanl 12496 American Seals West 21.65 Gaskets 12497 Arson;of Metro.Sewerage Agencies 450.00 Training Registration 12498 Aquatic Testing Laboratory 1,800.00 Lab Supplies 12499 BRSC 1,000.00 Membership 125DO BloSpherial Instruments Inc. 655.27 Instrument Pars 12501 Blair-Martin Cc Inc 968.99 Valve Manifolds 12502 Bloomberg L.P. 5,272.02 Financial Monitoring MO 41 93 12503 Bristol Systems,Inc 9,600.00 Professional Services 125D4 Bush&Associates Inc. 972.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 12505 Business Systems Corp. 12,015.63 Office Supplies 12WS Camels Corp. 4.562.50 Service Agreement 12507 Canus Corporation 1,756.34 Fiber Optic Cable 12508 Patrick B.Carnahan 250.00 Meeting Expense Relmb. 12509 Camllo Engineers 6,442.07 Engineering Services 12510 CaMmpolyde Commercial 5,850.00 Office,Furniture 12511 Charles P.Crowley Co. 1.050.26 Instrument Pads 12512 Chem-Dry Of Huntington Beach 750.00 Janitorial Services 12513 City of Fullerton 136.61 Water Use 12514 City of Seal Beach 292.85 Water Use 12516 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 21,135.15 Professional Services 12516 Communications Performance Group 15,980.00 Professional Services 12517 Computers America,Inc. 2,542.91 Computer Supplies 12518 Consolidated Electrical District 5D2.41 Electrical Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 718/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Desorption 12519 Cooper Cameron Corporation 14,110.09 Engine Supplies 12520 Copelce Capital,Inc. 1,432.00 Copler Lease 12521 Co.Laboratories,Inc. 400.00 Soil Testing 12522 Corporate Express 1.253.31 Office Supplies 12523 County Wholesale Electric Co. 112.01 Electrical Supplies 12524 Culligan Water Conditioning 30.00 Soft Water Service 12525 CCI Technologies 1.161.83 Cable Installation 12526 CEM Corporation 878.68 Lab Supplies 12527 CEPA Company 65.00 Lab Supplles 12528 CPI 1,206.90 Lab Supplies 12529 David E.Libed,Ph.D. 3,OD0.00 Management Training 12530 Dover Elevator Company 1,203.60 Elevator Maintenance 12531 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 324.12 Paint Supplies 12532 DGA Consultants,Inc. 6,58D.00 Surveying Services MO 6-8-94 12533 DSI:Data Systems International 8,947.56 Computer Supplies 12534 EBMUD-Activity 7945,Job 029 5,936.97 Workshop Registration 12535 Emergency Management Nehrork 5.625.00 CPR/Fimt Aid Training 125M Enchanter,Inc. 4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring NO 5.24.95 12537 Enertach 122.60 Electrical Supplies 12538 Filter Supply Company 5,067.53 Filters 12539 Fisher Scientific 3.678.26 Lab Supplies 12540 Fluid Tech.A Div.of FUN Inc. 495.65 Instrument Supplies r. 12541 Flynn Signs&Graphics,Inc. 736.10 Graphics Services [1 12542 Forked Engineering It Surveylo 1,120.00 Engineering Services P-150 i 12543 Foxboro Company 2.36" Instrument Supplies ru 125" Franklin Covey 377.02 Ofiics Supplies 12545 FMs Electronics 1.015.95 Employee Computer Loan Program 12546 G.E.Supply Company 4,022.20 Electric Parts 12547 Gas Machinery Research Council 395.00 Registration Fee 12648 GTE Cel6emia 2,014.61 Telephone Services 12649 Global Engineering&Management 11,340.00 Consulting Services 12550 WW Grainger Inc. 753.17 Compressor Supplies 12551 Great American Printing Co. 366.88 Printing 12552 Great Western Sanitary Supplier 1,710.04 JanBaaal Supplies 12553 Match&Kirk Inc. 2,689.44 Track Supplies 12554 Hewlett-Packard 306.02 Service Agreement 12556 HIM Inc. 095.35 Tools 12556 Hoerbiger Service Inc. 290.01 Compressor Parts 12557 Hunsaker&Assuo-lndne Inc. 2,710.91 Professional Services 12558 City of Huntington Beach 24,984.59 Water Use 12559 Hunt's Final Phase 7,000.00 Construction 12560 HI Standard Automotive 1,634.31 Truck Pans 12561 Integrated Performance Consulting 2,453.93 Pump Supplies 12562 Irvine Rench Water District 56.20 Water Use 12563 IPCO Safety-Ca 90.77 Safety Supplies 12564 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 3,613.13 Instrument Supplies 12565 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Co. 7,180.00 Software License Fees MO 7-24-96 12566 Keiser Foundation Health Plan 22,448.03 Medical Insurance Premium 12567 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. 23.976.94 Ferric Chloride M09.27-95 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 7/li Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12519 Cooper Comeron Coporaton 14,110.09 Engine Supplies 12520 Copeko Capital,Inc. 1,432.00 Copier Lease 12521 Core Laboratories,Inc. 400.00 Soft Testing 12522 Corporate Express 1,253.31 Office,Supplies 12523 County Wholesale Electric Co. 112.01 Electrical Supplies 12524 Culligan Water Conditioning 30.00 Soft Water Service 12525 CCI Technologies 1,161.83 Cable Installation 12526 DEN Corporation 87e.68 Lab Supplies 12527 CEPA Company 85.011 Lab Supplies 12528 CPI 1,206.90 Lab Supplies 12529 David E.Ubed,Ph.D. 3,0W.00 Management Training 12530 Dover Elevator Company 1,203.50 Elevator Maintenance 12531 Dunn-Edwards Comorallon 324.12 Paint Supplies 12532 DGA Consultants,Inc. 6,590.00 Surveying Services MO 6.8-94 12533 DSI:Data Systems International 8,947.56 Computer Supplies 125M EBMUD-Activity 7915,Job#29 5,936.97 Workshop Registration 12535 Emergency Management Network 5,625.00 CPRIFirai Aid Training 12536 Enchanter,Inc. 4,90D.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.2445 12537 Enedech 122.60 Electrical Supplies 12538 Filter Supply Company 5.087.63 Fillers 12539 Fisher Sraentlfic 3,678.25 Lab Supplies rY 12540 Fluid Tech.A Div.of FLW too. 495.65 Instrument Supplies N. 12541 Flynn Signs&Graphics,Inc. 736.10 Graphics Services rt 12542 Forked Engineering&Surveyin 1,120.00 Engineering Services P-160 4 12543 Foxboro Company 2,369.43 Instrument Supplies w 12544 Franklin Covey 377.02 Office Supplies 12545 Fr/s Electronics 1.016.95 Employee Computer Loan Program 12546 G.E.Supply Company 4.022.28 Electric Paris 12547 Gas Machinery Research Council 395.00 Registration Fee 12548 GTE CeI6omla 2.014.61 Telephone Services 12549 Global Engineering&Management 11,340.00 Consulting Services 12550 WW Grainger Inc. 753.17 Compressor Supplies 12551 Great American Printing Co. 368.88 Printing 12552 Great Western Sanitary Supplier 1,710.04 Janitorial Supplies 12553 Hatch&Kirk Inc. 2,689.44 Truck Supplies 12554 Hewlett-Packard 308.02 Service Agreement 12555 HIM Inc. 895.35 Tools 12556 Hoerblger Service Inc. 290.01 Compressor Parts 12557 Hunsaker&Assoc-Irvine Inc. 2.710.91 Professional Services 12558 City of Huntington Beach 24,984.59 Water Use 12559 Hunts Final Phase 7,000.00 Construction 12560 HI Standard Automotive 1.634.31 Truck Parts 12561 Integrated Performance Consulting 2.453.93 Pump Supplies 12562 Irvine Ranch Water District 56.2D Water Use 12563 IPCO Safety-Ca 90.77 Solely Supplies 12564 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 3,613.13 Instmmenl Supplies 12565 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Co. 7,18D.00 Software License Fees MO 7-24-96 125M Keiser Foundation Health Plan 22,446.03 Medical Insurance Premium 12567 Kemlmn Pacific,Inc. 23,076.94 Fame Chloride MO 9-27-95 County Sanitation Disincts Of Orange County Claims Paid 718198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12568 Knox Industrial Supplies 14.44 Tools 12569 Lab Safety Supply,lnc. 521.03 Safety Supplies 12570 Lab Support 2.324.00 Temporary Employment Services 12571 Leadership Directories,Inc. 627.95 Subscription 12572 Lord Fleming Architects,Inc. 1,620.00 Architectural Services 12573 to Cellular Telephone Company 1.606.75 Cellular Telephone Service 12574 M&D Machining 1100.00 Pump Supplies 12575 Maintenance Technology Corp. 341.82 Welding Supplies 12576 Marriott Orlando Hotel 150.00 Registration Fee 12577 Masime Company 1,483.75 Safety Supplies 12578 Matt Chtor Inc. 1.399.36 Faris Chloride Supplies 12579 Don Maurer 1,400.00 Consulting Services 12580 MC Junkin Corp 3.109.95 Plumbing Supplies 12581 McKenna Engineering 8 Equipment 973.60 Pump Supplies 12582 Measurement Variables,Inc. 338.18 Fillers 12583 Micro Flex $00.00 Gloves 12584 MlcmAge Computer 3.352.99 Software 12565 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Cc 8,101.57 Mechanical Repairs 12586 Minnesota Western 859.64 Lab Supplies 12587 Mission Uniform Service 10,099.34 Uniform Rentals 12588 Mission 159.56 Janitorial Supplies 12589 Monitor Labs Inc 945.92 Instruments N. 12590 Motion Industries 272.53 Pump Supplies rr 12591 National Technology Transfer 6.831.00 Training Registration Q 12592 Neal Supply Co. 1.120.60 Plumbing Supplies a 12593 Network Associates 12.174.10 Computer Services 12594 New Hodxons Computer Learning 245.011 Software Training Classes 12595 Clry of Newport Beach 89.37 Water Use 12596 Normal Controls Incorporated 1.428.47 Instrument Supplies 12597 Fred J.O'Brien 628.17 Training Expense Relrnb. 12598 The Ohmart Corporation 990.00 Instrument Supplies 12599 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc 705.00 Temporary Employment Services 12600 Orange Coast Pipe Supply 204.83 Plumbing Supplies 12601 Orange County Wholesale Electric 316.09 Instrument Supplies 12602 Orange Courier 10.80 Courier Services 12603 Orange Valve 8 Filling Company 213.80 Filings 12604 Ontex Co. 372.85 Pump Supplies 12605 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc 1.531.94 Electrical Supplies 12606 Pacific Bell 1.325.74 Telephone Services 12607 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1.672.48 Plumbing Supplies 12608 Pacific Process Equipment Inc. 0.00 Mechanical Supplies 12609 Padre Janitorial Supplies 2.169.59 Janitorial Supplies 12610 Parkhouse Tire Inc 141.03 Tims 12611 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. 1.172.96 rims 12612 Patrict Video Productions 1,181.46 Video Taping Services 12613 Pave West 995.00 Paving 12614 Pon Supply 393.00 Rope 12615 Power Maintenance International 0,279.00 Maintenance Agreement 12818 Power Pumps,Inc. 1,674.95 Pump Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 718/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12617 Process Software Cup. 20.158.50 Software 12618 Rainin Instrument Co.,Inc. 232.82 Lab Supplies 12619 Relphs Market#71 210.00 Flowers for Deceased Employee 12620 Realtlme Systems Corporation 70.55 Integration&Support Services 12621 Polestar 8,320.00 Life Insurance Premium 12622 Rellaslar Bankers Security 4,861.32 Life Insurance Premium 12623 Rosen Electrical 1,886.77 Electrical Supplies 12624 RJN Group, Inc. 10,193.50 CMMS Consulting Services 12625 RS Hughes Co..Inc. 4,853.76 Paint Supplies 12626 Safelila Glass Corp. 75.00 Auto Supplies 12627 Salely-Kleen 153.50 Service Agreement 12628 Santa Fe Industrial Products 358.36 Plumbing Supplies 12629 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. 830.75 Specialty Gases 12630 Sea Grant Communications 1.00 Publication 12631 Sea-Gear Corporation 265.00 Mechanical Supplies 12632 Sears 535.12 Mechanical Supplies 12633 Second-Sun 770.43 Light Fixtures 12634 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 183.12 Tools 12635 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 557.34 ToolsfHardware 12636 Siemon,Larsen S Marsh 3,000.00 Professional Services 12637 Severe 1,148.53 Lab Supplies 12638 Sigma Chemical Co. 861.26 Lab Supplies r 12639 South Coast Air Quality Management 150.00 Pemntt Fees rr 12640 Southern California Water 172.87 Water Use 12641 Special Plastic Systems,Inc. 2.636.89 Accumulators 4 2642 StaleNM 69.00 Seminar Registration 12643 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 2.829.00 Management Agreement 12644 Super Chem Corporation 608.85 Chemicals 12645 SAFT America,Inc. 4.632.37 Batteries 12646 Technomlc Publishing Company 39.95 Maintenance 12647 The Klplinger Callfomie Late 132.00 Membership 12648 Business Communications,Inc 225.80 Computer Services 12649 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 7,681.16 Mechanical Supplies 12650 Tony's Lock&Safe Service 673AI Locks&Keys 12651 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc 154.89 Truck Supplies 12652 Daniel E.TunniGl0 250.00 Meeting Expense Relmb. 12653 The Uneource Corporation 1.079.66 Office Supplies 12654 Velco Instruments Co.Inc. 863.63 Lab Supplies 12655 Valley Cities Supply Company 2,870.05 Plumbing Supplies 12656 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 579.71 Electrical Supplies 12657 The Ventage Group 14,6W.00 Consulting Services 12658 Vision Service Plan{CA) 7,673,40 Vision Service Premium 12659 VPPPA 300.00 Training Registration 12660 VWR Scientific Produce 6,700.55 Lab Supplies 12661 The Wackenhut Corporation 21,308.32 Security Guards 12662 Water Environment Federation 316.70 Professional Development Courses 12663 Waxie Sanitary Supply 680.06 Janitorial Supplies 12664 Western Sandblasting Company 500.00 Conference Registration 12665 Whatman,Inc 893.39 Lob Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 718198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12666 WEFfECV8 2,435.00 Conference Registration 12667 Xerox Corporation 756.41 Copier Leases 12668 Barbara A.Collins 112.74 Training Expense Reimb. 12669 Lawrence P.Kraemer 329.93 Training Expense Reimb. 12670 Peter M.Morrison 250.00 Training Expense Reimb. 12671 County of Orange 90.00 Underground Tank Fee 12672 County Sanitation District of O.C. 1,225.46 Petty Cash Reimb. 12873 Michelle Tuchman 49.09 Cellular Telephone Service Reimb. 12674 Countyof Orange 873.31 Service Agreement 12675 Southern California Edison 16,668.20 Power 12676 County of Orange 495.50 Permit Fees 12677 County Sanitation Districts of O.C. 66,410.48 Workers Comp Reimb. 12678 Beverly May Gilliam 63.75 Payroll Deduction 12679 Orange County Marshal 55,00 Garnishment Fee $ 1,991,578.57 F• rt 4 n, Orange County Sanitation Districts Claims Paid 718198 Summary Amount District No.2 $ 210.00 District No. 3 6.580.00 District No.5 17,640.20 CORF 137,011.70 Operating Fund 1,630,136.67 $ 1,991,678.67 w rt 4 J County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 722198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12807 Advance Constructors Inc. 6 143,309.00 Construction J-34-1,P2-355 12808 ADS Emironmentel Services,Inc. 61,746.00 Professional Services 12809 Bio Gro Division 61,646.67 Residuals Removal MO 4.26.95 12810 Boyle Engineering Corporation 26,494.80 Engineering Services 7-23 12811 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. 25,543.00 Engineering Services J-40-1,J-40-2 12912 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Co. 56.619.49 Software License Fees MO 7-24-96 12813 James Martin&Co. 42,779.19 Data Integration Project 12814 Kemircn Pacific,Inc. 49,621.61 Fenic Chloride NO 9.27-95 12815 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers 60,003.19 Engineering Services 237 12816 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. 114,560.37 Construction 3.38.3,2it-97 12817 Pima Goo Systems Inc 148,661.08 Residuals Removal NO 3-29.95 12818 Pinkerton Systems Integration 20,89D.57 Computer Supplies 12819 Science Applications Intl.,Co. 223,747.91 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 12820 Southern California Edison 44.913.19 Power 12821 Tule Ranch/Magan Fames 62.053,85 Residuals Removal 12822 Vulcan Chemical Technologies 81,271.95 Hydrogen Peroxide SWcMwUon No:C-W 12823 Xerox Corporation 45,515.66 Copier Leases 12824 Sverdrup Civil,Ina 444,420.90 Construction P2-353.P1.3",P246,P2.55 12825 Systems Integrated 198,373.68 Professional Services 1.1 12826 Robert F.Driver Associates 1.121.724.00 Pmpedy Insurance M0 6-10-92 �f 12827 Square D Company 77.283.00 Software License Agreement 12828 Woodro6,Spradiln&Smart 95.098.36 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 H. 12829 A-Plus Systems 822.93 Notices&Ads r* 12830 Abalix Environmental Corp. 199.34 Hardware [d 12831 Absolute Standards,Inc. 45.00 Lab Supplies 12832 Alt Products and Chemicals.Inc. 22,758.37 Lab Supplies 12833 Aladdin House 6D2.10 Window Blinds 12834 Allied Packing&Rubber Inc 2,674.60 Mechanical Supplies 12835 American Sigma,Inc. 51720 Mechanical Supplies 12838 Anthony Pest Control,Inc 180.00 Service Agreement 12837 Appleome Employment Service 5,542.08 Temporary Employment Services 12838 Applied Industrial Technology 79.93 Pump Supplies 12839 Art's Disposal Service,Inc. 310.40 Toxic Waste Removal 12U40 Asbury Environmental Services 110.00 Waste Oil Removal 12841 Awards It Trophies By Bea 60.45 Plaques 12842 AIRBORNE E(PRESS 36.95 Air Freight 12843 American Compensation Assoc 160.00 Membership 12844 American National Standards 586.00 Instrument Supplies 12545 Assoc of Metro.Sewerage Agencies 1,575.00 Training Registration 12646 Aquatic Testing Laboratory 6,2D0.00 Lab Supplies 12847 ARK Technologies 6,598.00 Data Processing 12848 AWSI 83.00 D.O.T.Training Program 12849 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. 4,471.50 Telephone Installation 12850 Barclays Lew Publishers 495.38 Subscription 12851 Be=Visual Systems 5.921.25 Service Agreement 12852 Berton Instruments,LLC 139.17 Instrumentation Maintenance 12853 Bauer Compressors 47.74 Compressor Supplies 12854 Bearcom 15,988.50 UHF Radio 12855 Bendy Nevada Corporation 443.92 Instrument Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 722/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12856 Boot Saw 287.37 Reimbusable Safety Shoes 12857 Bristol Systems,Inc. 6,060.00 Professional Servicas 12858 Jeffrey Brown 150.00 Training Registration 12859 Budget Janitorial,Inc. 3,605.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94 12860 Bureau Of Business Pmdlcs 218.20 Subscription 12861 Bush&Associates Inc. 2,724.00 Surveying Services MO6-25.97 12862 SEC-Building Electronic Controls 795.00 Registration Fee 12803 Ban Franklin Crafts 30.47 Award 12684 Cold Centrifugal Pump 3,018.00 Electrical Services 12865 California Environmental Controls 787.24 Pump Supplies 12866 California Auto Collision 100.00 Repalr Kits 12857 Cad R.Nelson,P.E. 200.00 Engineering Consultant 12868 Cad Wane.B Co. 300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 12869 Ca igo Engines 17.726.42 Engineering Services 12870 Cednel 20.00 Computer Services 12871 Charles McGee and Gateway 2,607.66 Employee Computer Loan Program 12872 The Cobb Group 69.00 Subscription 12873 Color Copy Center 16,380.62 Reproduction 12874 Communications Perfomsnce Group 2,000.00 Professional Services N 12875 Compucom 973.44 Computer Supplies 12876 Compose"Incorporated 133.23 Computer Services 12877 Computes America,Inc. 31.16 Computer Supplies IIIYYYY. 12879 Consolidated Electrical 2,801.35 Electrical Supplies r* 12879 Consumes Pipe&Suppiy Co. 3.001.65 Plumbing Supplies c9 12880 Continental Laboratory Product 2,520.83 Lab Supplies N 12881 Copelco Capgal,Inc. 1,432.00 Cooler Leese 12882 Core Laboratories,Inc 400.00 Sell Testing 12883 Corporate Express 10,793.39 Office Supplies 12884 Cori¢ch Engineering 15,623.29 ToolWHardware 12885 County of Orange 540.00 Underground Tank Fee 12986 County Sanitation Dialects of O.C. 16,993.46 Workees Comp.Reimb. 12887 Culligan Water Conditioning 30.00 Soft Water Service 12888 CCI Technologies 1,350.00 Cable Installation 12889 CPI 539.05 Lab Supplies 12890 CRG Marine Laboratories,Inc. 6,460.00 Lab Analysis 12891 CS Company 9,743.84 Plumbing Supplies 12892 CUFA 1,000.00 Membership 12893 Dataveu8 219.00 Offew Back-Up Tape Storage 12894 Dal Mar Analytical 190.00 Blosollds Analysis 12895 Diversified Inspections of Cal 14,779.50 Inspection Services 128M DGA Consultants,Inc. 3,465.00 Surveying Services MO ".94 12897 DWG Associates 8.000.00 Professional Services 12898 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 961.00 Medical Screening 12899 Elacho-Tesl,Inc. 3,101.00 Electrical Supplies 129M Emergency Management Network, 6.882.80 CPR/Fist Aid Treading 12901 EMek IRD International 1,924.95 Equipment Repair 12902 Enterprise Technologies 6,530.30 Consulting;Services 12903 Experaan 117.92 Orange County Property Information 12904 ExpoOTDR 18.485.00 Computer Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 722198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12905 EIMCO Process Equipment 3,766.94 Mechanical Supplies 12908 Environmental Lab Accreditation 3.119.00 Lab Fee 12907 ENS Resources,Inc. 7,526.28 Professional Services 12908 Fairbanks Spies,Inc. 516.23 Service Agreement 12909 Battey-Fischer&Porter Co. 30.12 Chlorination Supplies 12910 Fisher Scientific 122.57 Lab Supplies 12911 Fio-Systems,Inc. 18,472.91 Pump Supplies 12912 FM International,Inc. 11,100.00 Preparation of Utility Atlas,Phase I 12913 Gartner Group Inc. 23,400.OD Conference Registration 12914 The Gas Company 18,0D3.20 Natural Gas 12915 Gates Fiberglass Installers 671.00 Construction Services 12916 GTE California 7,514.61 Telephone Services 12917 VAN Grainger Inc. 688.14 Compressor Supplies 12918 Greseby STl 2,490.01 Engine Supplies 12919 Great American Printing Cc 2,417.02 Printing 1292D Harrington Industrial Plastics 163.61 Plumbing Supplies 12921 Hatch&Kid Inc. 1.132.01 Truck Supplies 12922 Haulaway Storage Containers 1,260.D0 Container Rentals 12923 Hewlen-Packard 1.561.90 Service Agreement I t 12924 Hoerelger Service Inc 962.22 Compressor Pans 12925 Holmes&Ni Inc 15,334.79 Engineering Services N 12926 Idexx 86.38 lab Supplies 12927 Imaging Plus,Inc. 1,322.40 Office Supplies rt 12928 Industrial Filer Manufacturer 3.078.85 Filter Supplies 12929 Inl'I Risk Mgt.Institute 21.00 Publication w 12930 Irvine Ranch Water Dlstdd 54.84 Water Use 12931 IC Engine&Equipment Servlce 5,138.32 Generator Supplies 12932 ITT Barton Sales 37.71 Instrument Supplies 12933 J.P.Morgan Securities,Inc. 22,536.08 COP Remarketing 1990-92 Series 12934 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 8.095.26 Equipment Rental 12935 Jensen Instruments Co. 1,159.72 Gauge 12936 Johnstone Supply 133.98 Electrical Supplies 12937 Joint Instrumentation 60.00 Seminar Registration 12938 Knox Indusmal Supplies 922.67 Tools 12939 Lab Support 830.00 Temporary Employment Services 12940 LaserAll Corp. 970.62 Service Agreement 12941 Liquid Handling Systems 1,159.80 Mechanical Supplies 12942 Mapinfo Corporation 2.187.00 Software 12943 Masune Company 139.95 Safety Supplies 12944 Me Welch Rack-N-Box Company 595.18 Truck Supplies 12945 McGarry Cenral 1,209.00 Maintenance Agreement 12946 Mee AnaMical System 21,690.41 Professional Services 12947 Medlin Controls Co. 435.33 Instrument Supplies 12948 Metier,Inc 2,400.00 Consulting Services 12949 Nat West Markets 750.00 COP Interest Draw Fees 12950 National Plant Services,Inc. 2,125.00 Vacuum Truck Services 12951 Newark Electronics 430.46 Instrument Supplies 12952 NAB Associates,Inc. 1,170.00 Lab Supplies 12953 Office Depot Business Services 7,344.21 Office Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 7/22198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 12954 Olsten Staling Service,Inc. 3,816.00 Temporary Employment Services 12955 One On One 238.25 Subscription 12956 Orange County Business Council 10,000.00 Annual Membership Dues 12957 Orange County Forum 30.00 Conference Registration 12958 Orange County Wholesale Electric 754.84 Instrument Supplies 12959 Orrick,Herrington&Sutcliffe 4,000.00 Profesional Services 12960 Ortiz Fire Protection 1,792.00 Service Agreement 12961 Osterbauer Compressor 4.097.31 Mechanical Supplies 12962 Oxygen Service Company 831.00 Specialty Gases 12963 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 341.50 Electrical Supplies 12964 Pacific Beg 67.39 Telephone Services 12965 Pacific Ball Internet Services 1,151.50 Internet Services 12966 Pacific Process Equipment Inc. 1,271AS Mechanical Supplies 12967 Pagenet 1.759.65 Rental Equipment 12968 Pads Unlimited 553.73 Truck Supplies 12969 Pizza Had 291.00 Meeting Expense 12970 Polydyne,Inc. 14,805.93 Cationic Polymer M03-11-92 12971 Port Supply 294.16 Rope 12972 Presidium Inc 2.083.33 Workees Comp,Claims Admin. 12973 Pumping Solutions Inc. 271.66 Mechanical Supplies 12974 PCS Express 357A0 Lab Services 12975 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. 75.93 Electrical Supplies 12976 Remedy 17.644.94 Temporary Employment Services 12977 RJN Group,Inc. 6.452.50 CMMS Consulting Services 12978 RPM Electric Motors 3.504.50 Electric Motor Supplies ✓' 12979 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 397.76 Paint Supplies 12980 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. 1,65827 Specialty Gases 12981 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. 181.00 Lab Repairs 12982 SesxnclSun 387.36 Light Fixtures 12983 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc 1.525.97 Tools 12984 Shureiuck Sales&Engineering 8.203.62 Tools/Hardware 12985 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh 9.000.00 Professional Services 12986 SkglPeth Seminars 398.00 On-Site Training 12987 Skyline Displays of O.C. 2,925.41 Halogen Light Set 1298E Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. 361A8 Plumbing Supplies 12989 Socc,Lynch Corp. 592.71 Janitorial Services 12990 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. 8.90 Permit Fees 12991 South Coast Water 250.00 Office Supplies 12992 South Coast Water 45.00 Lab Supplies 12993 Southern California Marine Inst. 1.930.00 Rental Equipment 129M Sprint 12.30 Long Distance Telephone Service 12995 Slate Board of Equalization 10524 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 12996 Sterling Art 43.63 Ad Supplies 12997 Steve Cassels Construction Co. 24.940.55 Poll ling 3-38-3 12998 Steven Enterprises,Inc. 355.69 Management Agreement 12999 Share International,Inc. 926.98 Chemicals 13000 Summit Steel 151.15 Metal 13001 Sun-Beg Landscape&Melntenan 4.420.00 Landscaping Maint. 13002 Sunset Ford 377.93 Truck Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 7Q2f98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13003 SCAP 24.000.00 Annual Membership Dues 13004 SCAOMD Subscription Services 15.958.00 Subscription 13005 SCSLUA Membership 75.00 Membership 13005 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 1,025.93 Office Supplies 13007 Thomas Bros.Maps 2,774.57 Panting 13008 Thompson Industrial Supply 1.671.29 Mechanical Supplies 13009 Thompson Publishing Group 269.00 Subscription 13010 Aerofund FlnanctaV7op Het Pro 369.80 Directoes Meeting Expense 13011 Traffic Control Service Inc. 295.00 Truck Supplies 13012 Tropical Plus Nursery,Inc. 12,598.84 Contract Groundskeeping MO5-11-94 13013 Track 8 Auto Supply,Ine. 2,920.2E To&Supplies 13014 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 4,388.00 Lab Services 13015 United Parcel Service 616.20 Parcel Services 13016 Unocal Corporation 26.25 Office Supplies 13017 US FIBerlPotymetrics,Inc 2,525.50 Lab Supplies 13018 Vace Instruments Co.Inc 97.41 Lab Supplies 13019 Valley Chat;Supply Company 1.419.14 Plumbing Supplies 13020 Varian Chromatography Systems 7,239.00 Lab Supplies 13021 Vector Resources 7.527.56 Instrument Supplies 13022 Veme's Plumbing 476.61 Plumbing Supplies 13023 Vicken Bedlkian 75.41 Claim Settlement 13024 Village Nurseries 465.10 Landscaping Supplies r. 13025 Vortex Corp. 3,056.74 Doom r* 13026 VWR Scientific Products 2,005.40 Lab Supplies bl 13027 The Wackenhut Corporation 15,075.41 Security Guards vk 1302E Waste Markets 7,888.3E Residuals Removal MO 3-27-98 13029 Waste Sanitary Supply 125.42 Janitorial Supplies 13030 The Welch Company 81.93 Subscription 13031 Western Stales Chemical Inc. 7,028.95 Caustic Soda MO 8.23.95 13032 Kirk Xpedex Paper B Graphics 109.99 Graphic Supplies 13033 2ymark Corporation 7,000.00 Lab Supplies 13034 Blake Anderson 184.00 Meeting Expense 13035 Mark Castillo 240.00 Training Expense Relmb. 13036 Donald F.McIntyre 2,484.72 Meeting Expense 13037 Robert Oaten 603.43 Meeting Expense 13038 Edward M.Torres 183.8E Meeting Expense 13039 Michael D.White 885.90 Meeting Expense 13040 Atlas-AIIIed.Inc 13,91111 Construction P246-2 13041 County Sanitation District of O.C. 679.33 Petty Cash Rehnb. 13042 Crlstopher D.Dahl 1,064.50 Mewing Expanse 13043 Employee Activity Committee 4,800.00 Employee Activity Budgeted Expense 13044 Lab Safety Supply,lnc. 1.225.37 Safety Supplies 13045 GTE California 127.17 Telephone Services E 3,984,182.11 Orange County Sanitation Districts Claims Paid 7122198 Summary Amount District No. 2 $ 75,337.98 District No. 3 55,465.65 District No. 7 926.98 District No. 11 2,724.00 CORF 350,541.92 Self Insurance Fund 2,083.33 Operating Fund 3,477,082.25 $ 3,964,162.11 rr th a, BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Dae ra ea.or a.. viz3roe AGENDA REPORT Item Number I Qe pmbe Orange County Sanitation District 1f FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Bill Aldridge, Principal Accountant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each revenue zone represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any revenue zone). Staff recommends ratification of payment of claims in accordance with the attached check listing. SUMMARY See attached check listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT 0 This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES % am Tai%w mavr.=i '• 901warILES�amsvaa Page N/A w CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 8/5/98, 8/19/98. BA \l'Yan`Calatby W VeN3PabCpa\NPFLLFS`damfpan Gac ems.. siw9e Page 2 Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8/5/98 Cheek No. Vendor Amount Description 13073 The Vantage Group,Inc. $27,843.00 Consulting Services-Source Control Programing Project 13074 Barclays Bank PLC $93.820.10 COP Letter of Credit 13075 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $111.825.44 Natural Gas 13076 Fodis Benefits Insurance Comp $35,647.34 Long Term Disability Premium 13077 Harbour Engineering Group $63.424.36 Mechanical Pans 13078 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan $25,318.34 Medical Insurance Premium 13079 Mike Silbermann Co. $31.989.75 Contractual Service for Repair of Sewer Lines 13080 NETG(National Educallon Training Group) $27.476.25 Subscription Library Rental 13081 Pacific Investment Management Co. $123.430.00 Investment Management Service Res.95.97 13082 Pacificane of Ca $35,051.49 Health Insurance Premium 13083 Pima Gro Systems Inc $76,266.92 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 13064 $Opp Chevrolet $48,071.59 Vehicle Purchase 13085 Southern California Edison $70,374.26 Power 13086 Tule Ranch/Magan Fames $46,388.67 Residuals Removal Spec#PA57 IM87 Margate Construction Inc. $288,350.21 Construction Pt-36-2 13088 Systems Integrated $112,355.54 Professional Services-J-31.3 13089 American Telephone&Telegraph $28.05 Long Distance Telephone Services 13090 American Telephone&Telegraph 56,182.17 Long Distance Telephone Services 13091 American Telephone&Telegraph $32.78 Long Distance Telephone Services 13092 AT&T $943.T7 Long Distance Telephone Services 13093 A-Plus Systems $6.154.93 Notices&Ads 13094 Abrasive Engineering Tool B Equipment $228.77 Hardware 13095 Aidce Systems,Inc. $458.76 Engine Supplies 13095 Allied Supply Co. 5790.00 Training Expense 13097 American Management Association $390.00 Seminar Registratbns/Subscription 13098 American Precision Industries $1,196.11 Mechanical Pads 13099 Angle Andersen 9282.00 Training Expense Reimb. 13100 Blake Anderson $607.97 Meeting&Cellular Telephone Expense Reimb. 13101 Angelus Engine Canter $108.14 Truck Supplies 13102 Anicem,Inc $414.00 Electrical Pads&Supplies 13103 Anthony Peet Control,Inc $101.50 Service Agreement 13104 Arens Industries Inc. $3,491.10 Instrument Supplies 13105 Asbury Environmental Services $55.00 Waste Oil Removal 13108 Ashree $32.00 Publication 13107 Atlantic Pool Care $235.00 Service Agreement 13108 AMA#Padgeh-Thompson $149.00 Training Expense 13109 American Seals West $448.72 Gaskets 13110 American Petroleum Institute $249.45 Publication 13111 ASIS $690.00 Training Expense 13112 Shabbir S.Bassi $653.25 Meeting Expense Reimb. 13113 Bauer Compreesms $116.24 Compressor Supplies 13114 Beckman Coulter $996.00 Office Supplies 13115 Bernadette D.Berdes $683.98 Technical Service Position Exp.Reimb. 13116 BRSC(Blosollds Recyclers of So.Cal.) $1,000.00 Membership 13117 Bomara Associates $1.532.05 Pretreatment Automation Study 13118 Eva M.Bradford $550.00 CASA Expense Reimb. 13119 Bristol Systems,Inc. $3200.00 Consulting Services,-Y2K Project 1312D Bryant&Associates $3,000.00 Consulting Services-Integrated Assets Protection Plan 13121 Burka Engineering Co. $75.48 Electrical Supplies Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 815M8 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13122 Burlington Safety Laboratory $199.00 Testing Services 13123 Ben Franklin Crafts $3D.48 Awards 13124 BNI Building News $363.93 Subscription 13125 C.P.I.(Calif.Pipeline Inspection) $2,556.02 Lab Supplies 13126 C.S.D.F.Foundation $8,750.00 Professional Services-Demographic Research 13127 Calif Centrifugal Pump $546.99 Electrical Services 13128 California Auto Refrigeration $562.22 Service Agreement 13129 California Journal $39.95 Publication 13130 Calolympic Safety $629.48 Safety Supplies 13131 Calbol,Inc. $6,974.64 Hardware 13132 Centrepointe Commercial Interior $1,698.14 Office Furniture 13133 Century Paint $541.77 Paint Supplies 13134 Clayton Group Services,Inc. $12,777.87 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 13135 Coast Fire Equipment $447.87 Service Agreement 13136 Computers America,Inc. $865.88 Computer Supplies 13137 Compuss,Inc. $1,694.72 Computer Software 13138 Connell GM Parts $79.23 Truck Supplies 13139 Consolidated Electrical Distribution $1,571.10 Electrical Supplies 13140 Consolidated Freightways $637.97 Freight 13141 Consolidated Plastics Company $543.78 Tools 13142 Construction Fabricators Inc $2,543.95 Construction Services-Repair of 91 North Gm Auger 13143 Consumer Pipe 6 Supply Co $1,377.57 Plumbing Supplies 13144 Converse Consultants $561.50 Consulting Services MO 8.11-93 13145 Core Laboratories,Inc $400.00 Soil Testing 13146 Corporate Express $1,823.88 Office Supplies 13147 Cost Containment Solutions $1,168.08 Workefs Compensation Services 13148 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $131.65 Truck Pads 13149 Orange County Sanitation District $20.03 Petty Cash Relmb. 13150 County Wholesale Electric Co. 366.81 Electrical Supplies 13151 CSM Metal Fabricating 3 Engine $851.23 Truck Supplies 13152 Janice Defray 3340.0D CASA Expense Relmo. 13163 Del Mar Analytical $610.00 Blosollds Analysis 13154 Dell Marketing L.P. $14,334.14 Computers 13155 Delta Foam Products $159.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 13156 Design Automation $236.50 Computer Software 13157 DeZudck $8,162.06 Valves 13156 Discount Laser $305.01 Computer Printer Supplies 13159 Dover Elevator Company $1,203.60 Elevator Maintenance 13160 Dunn-Edwards Corporation $250.41 Paint Supplies 13161 Eagle Distribution E50.99 Auto Supplies 13162 Enchanter,Inc. $4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring NO 5.24-95 13163 Enedech $24.25 Freight Charges 13164 Enterprise Technologies $11,08D.50 FIS Implementation Consulting Services 13165 Environmental Management Consulting $3.625.97 Professional Services-Troubleshooting for Parked Tower 13106 Environmental Sampling Supply $359.68 Lab Parts 6 Supplies 13157 Expeden $132.25 Orange County Property Information - 13188 ESP Industries,Inc $163.08 Mechanical Supplies 13169 Federal Express Corp. 3220.45 Air Freight 13170 Fibedron $1.076.29 Fiber Optic Cable Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8/5/98 Ghent No. Vendor Amount Desuiplion 13171 Finnigan Corp $11.000.00 Service Agreement 13172 Fisher Scientific $641.20 Lab Supplies 13173 Flo-Systems,Inc. $4.019.84 Pump Supplies 13174 Fountain Valley Canters $105.36 Photo Supplies 13176 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash $391.50 Truck Wash Tickets 13176 City of Fountain Valley $15.203.04 Water Use 13177 Franklin Covey $177.68 Office Supplies 1317E Fry's Electronics $2.454.30 Employee Computer Loan Program 13179 Ctty of Fullerton $195.35 Water Use 1318D Gained Lumber Company $107.98 Lumber/Hardware 13181 So.Cal.Gas Company $812.51 Natural Gas 13182 GTE California $2,075.03 Telephone Services 13153 George Yardley Co. $1.818.22 Lab Supplies 13184 Earrings Castle $604.97 Pump Supplies 13185 Gledich-Mitchell,Inc. $9.679.63 Pump Supplies 13188 Goldemvest Window Service $1,658.00 Window Cleaning Service 13187 WW Grainger Inc. $616.71 Compressor Supplies 13188 Graphic Distributors $311.56 Photographic Supplies 13189 Graseby STI $2,674.89 Engine Supplies 13190 Great American Printing Cc $4.671.57 Panting 13191 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $784.58 Janitorial Supplies 13192 GS Edeards Systems Technology $170.00 Alarm Service Call 13103 GST,Inc./Micro City $4.993.20 Once Supplies 13104 Hecker Equipment Company $105.97 Truck Supplies 13195 Hach Company $142.68 Lab Supplies 13198 Kevin L.Haddon $455.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 13197 Herb's Blackforest Bakery B Del $203.50 Dkedofs Meeting Expense 13198 Harwlett-Packard $323.25 Service Agreement 13190 Hoerbiger Serves Inc $1.192.59 Compressor Pads 13200 The Holman Group $752.60 EAP Premium 13201 Home Depot $544.24 Small Hardware 13202 Hub Auto Supply $250.82 Truk Parts 13203 City of Huntington Beach $13,614.36 Water Use 13204 Ideas for You.Inc. $943.03 O.C.Fair Items 13205 Idexx $748.59 Lab Para 8 Supplies 13206 Imaging Plus,Inc. $1,489.99 Office Supplies 13207 Irdustriol Threaded Products, $736.69 Connectors 13208 Information Resources $300.00 Personnel Services 13209 Inland Empire Equipment,Inc $2.227.76 Truck Supplies 13210 Irvine Rench Water Districts $23.92 Water Use 13211 Irvine Sci-Tech Books $81.85 Subscription 13212 IPCO Safety-Ca $1,895.31 Safety Supplies 13213 ISCO,Inc. $764.34 Lab Services 13214 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $2,944.49 Instrument Supplies 13215 Jay's Catering $516.22 Direcloes Meeting Expense 13216 Jensen Instruments Co. $514.64 Gouge 13217 Jim's Suspension Santee $50.00 Truck Repairs 13218 Johnstone Supply $47.73 Electrical Supplies 13219 Joint Instrumentation Committee $120.00 Seminar Registration Orange County Sensation District Claims Pam$15199 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13220 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. $1,437.50 Environmental Consulting Services MO 12-9-90 13221 Kato Engineering $5,913.80 Electrical Pans 8 Supplies 13222 Knox Industrial Supplies $1,207.10 Tools 13223 Lab Safety Supply.lnc. $2.818.03 Safety Supplies 13224 Lab Support $664.00 Temporary Employment Services 13225 Lab Systems $6.550.00 Chromatography Server 8 Acquisition Licenses 13226 LaMoee Company $560.71 Sulfide Test Kit 13227 Leadership Directories,Inc. $661.00 Subscription 13228 Liquid Handling Systems $356.78 Mechanical Supplies 13229 LA Cellular Telephone Company $2.013.57 Cellular Telephone Service 13230 LHI $50.00 Computer Software 13231 Maintenance Products.Inc. $7,778.00 Mechanical Supplies 13232 Maintenance Technology Corp. 54,638.20 Welding Supplies 13233 Mar Vac Electronics $375.06 Instrument Supplies 13234 Don Maurer $3.160.00 Consulting Services-Ocean Monitoring Program 13235 McKenna Engineering 8 Equipment $5,540.58 Pump Supplies 13236 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. $377.16 Tools 13237 Measurement Variables,Inc. $203.52 Filters 13238 Medlin Controls Co. $5.007.28 Instndnenl Supplies 13239 Mellon Trust $16,677.04 Investment Custodian Bank 13240 Mesa Muffler $255.44 Truck Supplies 13241 Micro Flax $304.00 Gloves 13242 Midway Mfg B Machining Co $6,593.38 Mechanical Repairs 13243 Mission Uniform Service $4,991.96 Uniform Rentals 13244 Moore Business Forms 8 Systems $1.612.30 Office Supplies 13245 MotoPholo $225.35 Photographic Services 13246 MGD Technologies,Inc. $1,000.00 Maintenance Agreement 13247 MPS Photographic Services $350.48 Office Supplies 13248 National Assoc.of Regional Co $75.00 Training Vktee 13249 National Microcomp Services $2,045.00 Service Agreement 13250 National Plant Services,Inc. $2,145.50 Vacuum Truck Services 13251 Neal Supply Co $659.97 Plumbing Supplies 13252 Nelson Marketing $1,877.21 O.C.Fah Items 13253 Newark Electronics $304.10 Instrument Supplies 13254 City of Newport Beech $109.10 Water Use 13255 Newport Electronics,Inc $986.85 Electrical Pads 8 Supplies 13256 The Norco Companies $127.00 Mail Delivery Service 13257 Northwestern Carbon $1.389.55 Filters 13258 Of Depot Business Services $1.126.99 Office Supplies 13259 Orange County Wholesale Electric $536.77 Instrument Supplies 1326D Omex Co. $695.61 Pump Supplies 13261 Orrick,Herrington 8 Sutcliffe $1,821.05 Arbitrage Rebate Compliance Services 13262 Oxygen Service Company $1,143.72 Specialty Gases 13263 OCB Reprographics $7.248.97 Blueprints 8 Photocopying,Spec 8 P-173 13254 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. $290.51 Electrical Supplies 13285 Pacific Bell $1,224.38 Telephone Services 13265 Pacific Mechanical Supply $193.78 Plumbing Supplies 13267 Pacific Pads and Controls,Inc. 32.750.21 Instrument Supplies 13258 Parkhouse Tire Inc $478.69 Tires ' e � Orange County Sanitation Disold Claims Paid 8/5/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13269 Pads Unlimited $332.15 Track Supplies 13270 Performance Training Associates $395.00 Training Expense 13271 Petco Animal Supplies $64.64 Lab Supplies 13272 PCI: Poly-Con Industries $2,302.19 Janitorial Supplies 13273 Pod Supply $359.83 Rope 13274 Power Pumps,Ina $2,812.20 Pump Supplies 13275 Harold Primrose Ice $48.00 Ice 13276 Pumping Solutions Inc. $4,102.68 Mechanical Supplies 13277 PSI Fulfillment $249.00 Computer Software 13278 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. $1,081.59 Electrical Supplies 13279 Red Wing Shoes $151.71 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 13280 Riordan&McKhude $1,972.00 Legal Services 13281 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop $223.10 Auto Repair 13282 RJN Group,Inc. $6,142.50 CMMS Consulting Services 13283 RM Controls $447.33 Instrument Supplies 13284 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc $13,532.00 Engineering Services 13285 RPM Electric Motors $5,317.11 Electric Motor Supplies 13286 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $2,726.09 Specialty Gases 13287 Sea Coast Designs,Inc. $56.00 Lab Supplies 13288 Second-Sun $858.22 Light Fixtures 13289 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $43.10 Tools 13290 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $1,637.22 Tools/Hardware 13291 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh $5,000.00 Professional Services-Shared Gowmance 13292 Sievers $290.00 Lab Supplies 13293 SkillPam Seminars $89.00 OnSke Training 13294 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. $393.37 Plumbing Supplies 13296 Sow-Lynch Corp. $74.48 Janitorial Services 13296 South Coast Water $35.00 Office Supplies 13297 Southern California SETAC $75.00 Training Expense 13298 Southwest Scientific Inc. $1,260.68 Instrument Supplies 13299 Spex Cerprep Inc. $72.38 Lab Supplies 13300 Strata International,Inc. $926.98 Chemicals 13301 Summit Steal $8,123.27 Metal 13302 Sunset Ford $445.57 Truck Supplies 13303 Super Power Products $193.95 Janitorial Supplies 13304 Taylor-Dunn $542.43 Electric Cart Pads 13305 Titan Power,Inc. $23.350.00 Maintenance Agreement 13306 Aemfund FinanciaVfop Hat Productions $627.54 Directors Meeting Expense 13307 Tri-State Seminar On-the{tiver $280.00 Seminar Registration 13308 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $205.07 Track Supplies 13309 TCH Associates,Inc. $900.86 Lab Supplies 13310 Ultra Scientific $490.83 Lab Supplies 13311 United Pumping Service $910.00 Emergency Vacuum Service&Spill Containment 13312 Valley Cities Supply Company $2.915.00 Plumbing Supplies 13313 Vision Service Plan-(CA) $7,629.30 Vision Service Premium 13314 Vossler&Company $937.37 Mechanical Supplies 13315 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $2,702.37 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No:C4)44 13318 VWR Scientific Products $11.206.32 Lab Supplies 13317 Water Environment Federation $13.30 Professional Development Courses Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 816198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13318 Waxia Sanitary Supply $125.42 Janitorial Supplies 13319 Wayne Electric Co. $543.07 Electrical Supplies 13320 Whessoe Varec,Inc. $3.537.40 Velves 13321 WEFTEC98 $655.00 Conference Registration 13322 Xerox Corporation $8.480.49 Copier Leases 13323 201h Century Plastics Inc $322.59 Office Supplies 13324 Olsson Construction $13.347.00 Construction Contract 9 P2.39.1 13325 Donald F.McIntyre $1,753.94 Meeting Expense Reimb. 13326 Michael D.Moore $1,122.92 Mewling Expense Reimb. 13327 Daniel E.TunnICI18 $246.34 Meeting Expense Reimb. 13328 Orange County Sanitation District $530.99 Patty Cash Reimb. 13329 Internal Revenue Service $178.95 Rebate Liability Interest Payment 13330 Margie Rice $340.00 CASE Expense Reimb. 13331 Internal Revenue Service $3.200.00 Rebate Liability Payment $1,891,228.31 Orange County Sanitation District Claims Pam 8/19/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13408 Aluminum Precision $34,265.18 Office Supplies 13409 Atlas Chrysler Plymouth $50,086.79 Vehicles Purchased-3 Dodge Trucks 13410 Dell Marketing L.P. $104.155.45 32 Pentium II 400 MMX/266 Computers for 220,230,520.720,820.910.920 13411 Delta Dental $39,225.04 Dental Insurance Plan 13412 Giedlch-MBchell,Inc. $68,211.33 Pump Supplies 13413 Lee B Ro Inc $31,065.62 Engineering Services-P140.1,P147,P247-1,P2-39 13414 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. $486,093.60 Construction 3.38.3,2-R-97 13415 Orange County Flood Control District $109,000.00 Service Contract,MO 2-25-98 13416 Orange County Water District $71,664.00 Green Acres Project Agreement 13417 Painewebber Incorporated $60.186.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 13418 Pima Gm Systems Inc $146,392.94 Residuals Removal NO 3-29-95 13419 Southern Califomla Edison $45,099.26 Power 13420 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $124.112.70 Construction 7-7-1 13421 Tula RanchfMagan Fanns $53.765.85 Residuals Removal Spec 0 P-157 13422 United HeallhCare/Matra Health $133.814.76 Medical Health Insurance 13423 Advance Constructors Inc $258,527.70 Construction J44-1,P2-35-5 13424 Airpol Construction,Inc. $70.786.89 Construction P1-51R 13425 CNA Trust $28.725.30 Construction Contract 8541-1 13426 A 8 D Party Rentals $719.50 All Hands Meeting Supplies 13427 American Telephone 8 Telegraph $1.56 Long Distance Telephone Services 13428 Air Products 8 Chemicals $22,500.00 O 8 M Agreement Oxy Gen.Syt NO 8-8.89 13429 Airborne Express $152.78 Air Freight 13430 Atlas Construction Company $9,008.00 Service Contract,P2 floor installation 13431 Allied Supply Co. $9,609.60 Plumbing Supplies 13432 Allied Supply $395.00 Training Expense 13433 American Airlines $8,116.39 Travel Services 13434 American Management Association $150.00 Seminar Registrations/Subscription 13435 Anicem,Inc. $726.46 Electrical Parts 8 Supplies 13436 Appleone Employment Service $1,104.00 Temporary Employment Services 13437 Applied Industrial Technology $180.98 Pump Supplies 13438 Armor-Vac $1,050.00 Vacuum Truck Services 13439 Arts Disposal Service,Inc. $620.80 Toxic Waste Removal 13440 Awards 8 Trophies By Bea $80.49 Plaques 13441 Assoc of Metro.Sewerage Agencies $850 oo Training Registration 13442 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc $4,248.29 Telephone Installation 13443 Barclays Law Publishers $60.00 Subscription 13444 Layne T.Baroldi $908.25 Meeting Expense Reimb. 13445 Battery Specialties $652.83 Batteries 13446 Ben Franklin Crafts $158.62 Award 13447 Bic Gr4 Division $500.32 Residuals Removal MO 4.26-95 13448 Bristol Systems,Inc. $4,400.00 Consulting Service-y2K Project 13449 Bureau of National Affairs $1.090.14 Subscription 13450 Burlington Safety Laboratory $199.00 Testing Services 13451 BASF Corporation $335.00 Janitorial Supplies 13452 Cal South Industrial $644.38 Calibrate/Repair Digital Crane Scale 13453 California Auto Refrigeration $371.66 Service Agreement 13454 California Automatic Gate $95.00 Maintenance Agreement-9 Automatic Gates P18 P2 13455 Calolympic Safety $872.47 Safety Supplies 13460 Caltrol,Inc. $1,315.43 Hardware Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8119/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13457 Carleton Engineers B Consultants $1,211.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality 13458 Carollo Engineers $3,216.16 Engineering Services MO 5.12-93 13459 Centrepointe Commercial Interior $172.40 Office Furniture 13460 Chem-Dry Of Huntington Beach $470.00 Service Agreement 13461 Circult Wodd $3,000.00 Once Supplies 13462 Cole,Inc. III Workshop Registration 13463 Computers America,Inc. $261.09 Computer Supplies 13464 Consolidated Electrical Distribution $3,577.95 Electrical Supplies 13465 Continental-McLaughlin $225.74 Tools 13466 Cooper Cameron Corporation $1.761.76 Engine Supplies 13467 Corporate Express $793.22 O(Sce Supplies 13468 Costs Mesa Auto Supply $224.59 Truck Pads 13469 County of Orange $2,232.25 Underground Tank Fee 13470 Drum Pro Services $2,D46.50 Maintenance Agreement 13471 Crystal Glass&Minor $5,870.00 Inebriation of New Doors P2 Control Center 13472 Culligan Water Conditioning $30.00 Soft Water Service 13473 CPI $394.60 Lab Supplies 13474 DeZudck $3,850.99 Valves 13475 DGA Consultants,Inc. $4,349.89 Surveying Services MO 6.8-94 13476 Eagle Dismbutlon $29.16 Auto Supplies 13477 Electra Bond,Inc. $5,589.96 Mechanical Supplies 13478 Enchanter,Inc. $3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 13479 Environmental Resources Assocl $1,159.80 Lab Services 13480 Evergreen $30.00 Mechanical Pads Degreaser 13481 Federal Express $101.60 AIr Freight 13482 Fountain Valley Camara $10.43 Photo Supplies 13483 Foxboro Company $1,073.00 Instrument Supplies 13484 Franklin Covey $1,523.57 Office Supplies 13485 Frazee Pairs and Wallcovering $197.72 Paint Supplies 13486 Fry's Electronics $705.74 Employee Computer Loan Program 13487 FM International,Inc. $4,950.00 Service Agreement 13488 So.Col.Gas Company $2.985.12 Natural Gas 13489 GTE California $7,233.75 Telephone Services 1349D George Yardley Co. $1,866.88 Lab Supplies 13491 Georgetown Publishing House $97.00 Subscription 13492 God Looker 8 Associates $10.500.00 Consulting Service-Customer Expectations Focus Group 13493 Getinge Castle $1.382.99 Pump Supplies 13494 Graphic Dismbutom $2.140.73 Photographic Supplies 13495 Great American Printing Co $6.865.74 Printing 13496 GBC(General Binding Corp) $247.60 Maintenance Agreement 13497 GS Edwards Systems Technology $5,475.00 Service Maintenance Agreement 13498 GST,Inc./Micro City $8.960.49 Office Supplies 13499 Hewitt Primrose Ice $144.00 Ice 13500 Hewleft-Packard $129.14 Service Agreement 13501 Hcerbiger Servica Inc $502.37 Compressor Pads 13502 Home Depot $99.31 Smell Hardware 13503 Idexx $2,807.86 Lab Paris 8 Supplies 13504 Imaging Plus,Inc. $777.00 Office Supplies 13605 Industrial Threaded Products $77.43 Connecters Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8119MO Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13506 Infilco Degremont,Inc. $924.89 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 13507 Inland Empire Equipment,Inc. $363.45 Truck Supplies 13508 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $186.87 Lab Supplies 13509 Inside CAL I EPA $535.00 Subscription 13510 Intl Risk Mgmt.Institute,Inc. $69.96 Publications 13611 Interstate Battery Systems $805.33 Bananas 13512 Irvine Photo Graphics $13.38 Photographic Services 13513 IPCO Safety-Ca $1,491.37 Safely Supplies 13514 J.O.Tucker and Son,Inc. $970.29 Instrument Supplies 13616 Jay's Catering $469.42 Director's Meeting Expense 13516 Jobs Available Inc. $288.00 Notices B Ads 13517 Johnstone Supply $893.74 Electrical Supplies 13518 Kehl Sclenti9c Instruments $4.212.95 Sect Drive 13619 Kelar Carp $343.94 Training Materials 13520 Kelly Paper $44.47 Paper 13521 Knox Industrial Supplies $2,573.53 Tools 13522 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. $311.79 Safety Supplies 13523 League Of California Cities $50.00 Conference Registration 13524 Lord Fleming Architects,Inc $4.580.00 Architectural Services-P1407,MO 9.24-97 13525 MacDonald-Stephens Engineers, $15,088.50 Engineering Services 2.37 13520 Maintenance Superintendents Assoc. $70.00 Membership 13627 Maintenance Troubleshooting $32.50 Publications 13528 Mamcc International $138.81 Maintenance Supplies 13529 Mandic Motors $275.00 Towing Services 13530 Mosune Company $132.55 Safety Supplies 13531 Don Maurer $3.150.00 Consulting Service-Ocean Monitoring Program 13532 Mc Junkin Corp $8.974.60 Plumbing Supplies 13633 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. $156.59 Tools 13534 Medlin Controls Co. $264.22 Instrument Supplies 13535 Metier,Inc $600.00 Consulting Services-Boom Control Data Integration Project 13536 Micro Flax $900.00 Gloves 13537 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. $7,370.00 Mechanical papelrs 13538 Mission Uniform Service $3.371.72 Uniform Rentals 13539 Mission $1,694.70 Maintenance Supplies 13540 MotoPhote $109.95 Photographic Services; 13541 MOD Technologies,Inc. $1,000.00 Maintenance Agreement 13542 MPS Photographic Services $52.25 Office Supplies 13543 National Microwmp Services $2,045.00 Service Agreement 13644 Netlink Ltd. $1,792.97 Communications Equipment 13545 New Horizons Computer Learning $1.275.00 Software Training Classes 13546 Newark Electronics $22.220.16 Instrument Supplies 13547 NCSS Statistical Software $255.95 Computer Software 13548 Once Depot Business Services $2.019.51 Office Supplies 13549 OMca Pavillion $20.644.70 Odes Furniture Repairs 13550 Orange Coast Pipe Supply $91.94 Plumbing Supplies 13551 Orange County EMA $723.00 County Service Fee 13552 Orange County Forum $450A0 Conference Registration 13553 Orange County Wholesale Electric $212.17 Instrument Supplies 13554 Oxygen Service Company $2.666.01 Specialty Gases Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid 8/19M Check No. Vendor Amount Description 13565 OCV Control Valves $1,004.26 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 13556 P.L.Hewn Company,Inc. $376.06 Electrical Supplies 13557 Pacific Bell $1.151.50 Telephone Services 13558 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2,534.84 Plumbing Supplies 13559 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. $270.82 Instrument Supplies 13560 Padre Janitorial Supplies $34.67 Janitorial Supplies 13561 Parkhouse Tire Inc $1.165.08 Tires 13562 Perkin Elmer Service $717.50 Filters 13563 Perkin-Elmer Corp. $748.05 Fibers 13564 Palm Animal Supplies $100.13 Lab Supplies 13565 Pinkerton Systems Integration $10.240.00 Computer Supplies 13566 Pitney Bowes $374.43 Postage Machine Service Agreement 13567 Style Dining Inc. $435.86 Permit Fee Refund 13568 Fluid Components,International $4,006.87 Instrument Supplies 13569 Public Risk Management Assoc. $28.50 Membership 13570 PC$Express $462.60 Courier Service 13571 Filibster $24,584.21 Life Insurance Premium 13572 Relieetar Bankers Security Life $4,888.64 Ufa Insurance Premium 13573 RUN Group,Inc. $9.552.25 CMMS Consulting Services 13574 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. $121.11 Paint Supplies 13575 Safellte Glass Corp. $466.54 Auto Supplies 13570 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $52.06 Tools 13577 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $96.86 TcoleMardware 13578 Snap-On Incorporated $130.57 Tools 13579 So Coast Air Quality Management $321.40 Pump Supplies 13560 Southern California Edison $7,329.05 Power 13681 Space Leasing Company $18.398.90 Construction Trailers P2-70 13502 Stale Board Of Equalization $280.00 Underground Fuel Storage Fee 13583 Sterling Ad $64.85 Ad Supplies 13584 Summit Steel $273.69 Metal 13585 Time Warner Communications $40.47 Cable Services 13588 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $578.00 Lab Services 13587 Vertex Business Systems $077.50 Office Furniture 13588 The Wackenhut Corporation 56,083.04 Security Guards 13589 Water Environment Federation $1.050.00 Professional Development Courses 13590 Western Business Systems $518.14 Office Supplies 13591 The Writing Company $7,500.00 Professional Services-Development of a Public Ocean Booklet 13592 WESTCAS $2.200.00 ULFT Mailers 13593 3 Corn Corporation $61.72 Training Registration 13594 Donald F.McIntyre $330.80 Meeting Expense Reimb 13595 Samuel L.Mowbray $319.18 Meeting Expense Relmb 13596 Michelle Tuchman $19.73 Cellular Telephone Celle Reimb. 13597 Allied Supply $395.00 Training Expense 13598 Orange County Sanitation District 5447.78 Petty Cash Reimb, 13599 Michelle Tuchman $341.13 O.C.Fair Appreciation Dinner Expense Reimb. 13600 Bristol Systems,Inc. $5,350.00 Consulting Services 13601 Moreland&Associates $7,911.00 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 $2,342.081.13 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting D. To Board 9/23/96 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item ly w Orange County Sanitation District `-1 FROM: Don McIntyre, General Manager Originator: Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve the 1994 Amendment to the National Water Research Institute (NWRI) Joint Powers Agreement which did not undergo official Board action or approval due to an NWRI oversight. 2) Approve amendments No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 to the 1994 Amendment to the NWRI Joint Powers Agreement. SUMMARY The National Water Research Institute (NWRI) was founded in 1991 by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC), the Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD), the Municipal Water District of Orange County(MWDOC), the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and the San Juan Basin Authority. The joint powers agreement between these agencies was established to allow for cooperative efforts to be undertaken in the research, development and implementation of public water projects that impact water supply, water conservation, water quality, and efficient use of Orange County water resources. The current annual contribution of each member is $50,000 annually. On July 28, 1994, the NWRI Board approved a restated and amended version of the 1991 joint powers agreement. The amendment contained minor modifications and allowed for the expansion of the NRWI Board from 5 to 15 to accommodate the admission of new members. Due to an NWRI oversight, this document was never circulated to each agency's governing body for concurrence and approval. The 1994 revised agreement is attached for review. On July 24, 1998, three NWRI Board approved amendments were forwarded to the member agencies for concurrence and approval. These amendments modify the existing 1994 agreement. In brief, the amendments are: e Amendment No. 1 recommends the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) be admitted as an NWRI member agency. NYEOntlW1My.GO daklWJ nl6a Ap RaN,e`1WbB9M9Rl Raµr Rp ,� Page 1 • Amendment No. 2 recommends the San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department be admitted as an NWRI member agency. • Amendment No. 3 recommends that any out-of-state agency applying for membership be given full Membership in lieu of Associate Membership status. Amendments No. 1, 2, and 3 are attached for review. General Counsel has reviewed all referenced documentation and has approved as to form. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVES Disapprove amendments to the NWRI Joint Powers Agreement and withdraw from NWRI membership. CEOA FINDINGS Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS \YticnlWbly.TaWpq.\tWB bM& HAg. R•.v'WIJDP lq.pv R.A.eP. 1rs Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Dace I TaeamE Dg123% AGENDA REPORT Rem NUMW Rem Ngbm Orange County Sanitation Dist ' /J FROM: David Ludwin, erector of Engineering Originator: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF LA HABRA HEIGHTS AND CITY OF LA HABRA GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve Sewer Service Agreement for Tract 46591 between OCSD, City of La Habra Heights, and City of La Habra, subject to finalization by General Counsel. SUMMARY A sewer service agreement is needed to provide sewer service to a new development in the City of La Habra Heights, in Los Angeles County, just north of La Habra, in an area with natural drainage tributary to Orange County. Since this part of Los Angeles County drains into Orange County and is immediately adjacent to a local sewer owned by the City of La Habra, an agreement between the two cities and OCSD is required to provide sewer service to seventeen homes that otherwise could not be sewered without extraordinary cost. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This is not an OCSD Capital Improvement Project. Therefore, there is no project cost to OCSD. The developer, Cal Pac, pays for all construction and inspection costs. Staff costs and legal fees associated with the preparation of the agreement will be supported by OCSD. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) O:NIp WftendaD ft Rep ftl M eOeNeLLa Haba Helplts Od Mdx Hewed . Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION On February 10, 1993, the Joint Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County adopted Resolution No. 93-14 and declared their intent to allow District No. 3 to provide sewer service for certain properties within the municipal boundaries of the City of La Habra Heights in Los Angeles County. These properties drain naturally to Orange County and to sewer them into Los Angeles County would require a pump station and additional costs to the public. In July 1998, OCSD Board of Directors adopted Resolution OCSD 98-11, reaffirming the policy pertaining to future areas to be served by the Orange County Sanitation District. Cal Pads development can easily be served through a connection to an existing local sewer line in the City of La Habra. In March 1998, Cal Pac, a developer of homes, requested a sewer connection for seventeen homes in Los Angeles County that naturally drain towards Orange County. Cal Pee has agreed to connect to the OCSD sanitary sewer in this area and pay for OCSD sewer connection fees based on $2,360.00 per residential unit for Tract 46591. They also must pay an equivalent annexation acreage fees of $4,244 per acre, for their tract, which is outside of Orange County, and they have agreed to a means of collecting future sewer user fees on an annual basis. La Habra Heights will collect sewer service charges on OCSD behalf on the property tax bill. La Habra Heights shall pay the District the amounts levied on the property tax bills by June 30th of each year. Staff requests approval of the agreement, which is subject to finalization by General Counsel. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None CFW:jo:jam HAwp_dtabng\720\winsor\AI11La Habra Heights 09230.dw s:mmimnnamea Deft Repw aM B-.b wen H.19eh(KOWS.ma H�. s Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Tgeaae es/23/se AGENDA REPORT Item Number Iein/Number Orange County Sanitation Distri FROM: David Ludwin, irector of Engineering Originator: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT AND SHEA HOMES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve Sewer Service Agreement between OCSD, Los Angeles County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, and Shea Homes, subject to finalization by General Counsel. SUMMARY A sewer service and connection agreement is needed to provide sewer service to a new development in unincorporated Orange County north of Buena Park and west of Fullerton along Beach Boulevard south of Hillsborough Drive. Since OCSD cannot act as a local sewering agency in this part of Orange County, an agreement with the Los Angeles County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District and Shea Homes is needed to provide sewer service for this new development. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This is not an OCSD Capital Improvement Project. Therefore, there is no project cost to OCSD. The developer, Shea Homes, pays for all construction and inspection costs. Staff costs and legal fees associated with the preparation of the agreement will be supported by OCSD. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (tine item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) G NVlobaKN&nda Q ft Rep .MU tQoer6cVSbea Hanes 08219B.d. Rwi. SW98 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION On June 8, 1960, County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County entered into a mutual sewage flow agreement with County Sanitation District No. 18 of Los Angeles County. This agreement was for the purpose of receiving, collecting and treating the respective sewage flow from each of the two agencies that naturally drain from one agency's service area into the other agency's service area. In February 1998. Shea Homes, developer for Somerset Community Association, requested a sewer connection on a manhole in unincorporated Orange County along the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer in Beach Boulevard, north of Buena Park and south of La Habra. Sixty-seven homes will be in Orange County as a part of Tract 15408 and 107 homes in La Mirada (Los Angeles County) as a part of Tract 52279. Both tracts drain by gravity into the OCSD sewer drainage area. Both tracts are covered within the area of the 1960 sewer flow agreement. Tract No. 52279 is in the City of La Mirada. The City is the local sewering agency for the tract, even though the sewage flow will be conveyed into Orange County. The City of La Mirada has told District staff that it will use the Los Angeles County Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District (LACCSMD) to perform the actual tasks of cleaning and maintaining the local sewers. Tract No. 15408 is in an unincorporated portion of northwest Orange County and does not have a City or other local sewering agency from which local sewer service can be provided. OCSD cannot be a local sewering agency and therefore cannot provide local sewer service, only regional sewer collection, for this area. General Counsel has confirmed that LACCSMD can legally act as the local sewering agency for both Tract 15408 and 52279. Shea Homes has agreed to connect to the OCSD sanitary sewer and pay for OCSD sewer connection fees based on $2,360.00 per residential unit for both tracts. They also must pay equivalent annexation acreage fees of$4,244 per acre, for Tract 52279, which is outside of Orange County, and they have agreed to a means of collecting future sewer user fees on an annual basis. As detailed in the agreement, OCSD will collect sewer service charges on the behalf of Los Angeles Consolidated from the property owners in Tract 15408. Collection will be via either direct invoicing or the tax bill. Dwelling units located in Tract 52279 will pay sewer service charges directly to Los Angeles Consolidated. Staff requests approval of the agreement, which is subject to finalization by General Counsel. ALTERNATIVES None. G D.M1 FepaM1iVanl EUarhlS,iea Xvrcs 03219B Ox k-. � Page 2 ti CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None CFW:jo:jam G NCgbWMpenGe prafl HepohUdnlQmr�VS�ea Hmgs L9}398.tloc R—. WM Page 3 FAHR COMMMEE Meeting Dte I T.08d aDr. g/z3iss AGENDA REPORT em Number [Oem Nzumbe Orange County Sanitation DIStnCt FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: SUMMONS & COMPLAINT RE EMINENT DOMAIN ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY BY THE FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, a Public Joint Powers Agency, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 797439, in connection with eminent domain acquisition of Parcel No. 300290-1, including sewer easement owned by the District in the vicinity of Jamboree Road and Barranca Parkway in the City of Irvine; and 2) authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY Please see attached memo from General Counsel dated September 14, 1998. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A H t"v.aurmssoene�=mewwrt-oouaimmao,a� Page 1 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Memo from General Counsel dated September 14, 1998. BG A.�..a moan Page 2 DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES COMBINED MEETING Wednesday, August 26, 1998 at 5 p.m. A meeting of the combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, August 26, 1998 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Board Michael Stromgren Peer Swan, Vice Chair Ryal and Christopher Wheeler Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Jan Debay, Chair, PDC Committee STAFF PRESENT: George Brown, Chair, FAHR Committee Don McIntyre, General Manager John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Directors Absent: Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Bill Steiner, County Supervisor Mike Peterrnan, Director of Human Resources David Ludwin, Director of Engineering AD HOC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Mike Moore, ECM Manager Directors Present: Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer George Brown, Chair Peer Swan, Vice Chair Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Jan Debay, Chair, PDC Committee North Eckenrode, GAR Joint Coordinating Committee Member John Collins, Past Chairman of the Board Directors Absent: Bill Steiner, County Supervisor (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) AGENDA The agenda was posted in accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2. OCSD . P.O.BU at9 . Fountain Va' y,CA 9272Sa177 . (714) 9E2-2411 Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 2 August26, 1998 (4) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (5) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the of the July 29, 1998 Combined Steering and Ad Hoc Committees meeting were approved. (6) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Burnie Dunlap did not make a report. (7) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre announced that Ron Unsky, Executive Director of the National Water Research Institute, would be making a 15-minute presentation on the mission and activities of this organization. Director Debay, the District's representative on the Board, will be making the introduction. Blake Anderson updated the members on the biosolids ordinance considered by the Kern County Board of Supervisors and the impacts on the District. Staff is continuing its efforts to reach equitable solutions. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff did not make a report. (9) STEERING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. Request of Michael Slromgren re Early Retirement Incentive Program. Michael Stromgren explained his reasons for requesting increased benefits because of his special circumstances. The General Manager indicated that staff has already denied the request because it would establish precedence that is unacceptable at this time. The current limit is one-years salary or up to$50,000. Mr. Stromgren was offered one year's salary. The members agreed to uphold staffs decision. While the request could be presented to the full Board, the members of the Steering Committee would not support it. B. Class of 2000. General Manager McIntyre described the Class of 2000 program and the request by organizers for a contribution from the District. The Steering Committee members denied the request. W Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 3 August 26, 1998 C. Agenda Items for September Working Committees. OTMS Chair McGuigan indicated that there may be a plant tour in October. She also indicated that the October OMTS meeting date conflicts with a League of Cities conference and asked if It could be moved. After discussion, the following changes were approved: OMTS Committee Wednesday, October 14 PDC Committee Thursday, October 8 FAHR Committee Wednesday, October 7' *Note: After subsequent discussions with staff and the FAHR Chairman, this date was changed to October 21. (10) REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE CHAIR Chairman George Brown did not make a report. (11) COMBINED STEERING AND AD HOC COMMITTEES DISCUSSION ITEM(S) A. The members debriefed staff on the August 22 Directors Workshop. Before making the presentation to the Board in September, the colors and highlights on the alternatives chart should be changed. Staff will be making a recommendation and requesting that the Directors determine the preferred alternative. The CEQA process considers all of the alternatives. There is a dilemma because of the timing of the OCWD's GWR EIR process. The impacts of this project must be clearly understood by the Directors. Mr. McIntyre indicated that we can ask the OCWD to slow down their process, which is three months ahead of our CEQA process. Staff was directed to get the legal counsels of both agencies to address CEQA conformity and report back next month. Consultants from both agencies should also be meeting. Staff was encouraged to make a strong recommendation. The draft agenda report should be sent to the Ad Hoc Committee members for review before including it in the September agenda package. (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were no other business, communications or supplemental agenda items. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. Minutes of the Combined Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting Page 4 August 26, 1998 (14) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting, which will be a combined meeting with the Ad Hoc Committee, is scheduled for 5 p.m., Wednesday, September 23, 1998 (15) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:17 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to California Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable actions were taken re Agenda Items Nos. 16.A.1 and 2. At 6:27 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:27 p.m. Submitted by: J Tappan S ering Committee Secretary Nhp.GblgvWl5lEFlMf'CCYWnE£GSM W^090NSCNIINxY.IL b0 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1998 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on September 2, 1998, in the District's Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Gayn Winters—Bristol Systems Burnie Dunlap, Board Chair Toby Weissert—Corollo Engineers James Ferryman, Vice Chair Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Staff Present: John Collins Don Bankhead Don McIntyre, General Manager Steve Anderson Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Margie L. Rice Ed Hodges, Director General Services Admin. Charles E. Sylvia Bob Ooten, Director Operations and Maintenance Patrick Miles, Director Information Technology Directors Absent: Michelle Tuchman, Director Communications Bob Ghirelli, Director Technical Services Anna Piercy Mike Moore, Interim Director Technical Services Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Frankie Woodside, Committee Secretary Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager Ed Torres, Air Quality &Special Projects Manager George Robertson, ECM Supervisor APOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. OCSD • v.O.ew $127 0 FovMMWeWCA OMM127 • (714)M.2411 Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee d Page 2 September 2, 1998 APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the July 8, 1998 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR No report was given. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER No report was given. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Status of Biosolids up in Kern County: In July, the Kern County Board of Supervisors began action to ban the agricultural use of eliminating "our' biosolids. That action was turned back and an urgency ordinance to regulate biosolids was implemented on August 18, 1998. We believe that the ordinance is basically a sound public policy because it is intended to protect public health, groundwater quality and agricultural productivity. The bad news is that the Supervisors also passed a $5.00 a ton "tipping" fee for road repairs. We thought the fee would be $2.25 a ton temporarily and it would eventually end up to be approximately $1.00 a ton on the 180,000 tons we distribute annually. We have stipulated to the Board of Supervisors in testimony provided at the hearing, that we would be willing to pay for a road and traffic survey to establish a fair rate. We have selected a firm called Martin Macintosh, who will be working on the Scope of Work for a dollar amount of approximately $10,000. We expect that study will be completed at the end of September. The Board of Supervisors is willing to do a retroactive roll back in the event that the study finds $5.00 excessive. Staff will continue to brief the Board and this committee as events unfold. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (Hodges) The Cooperative Projects Program meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 8, 1998. The question of available funds will be discussed at the September FAHR committee meeting. Regarding the PVEA funds, I contacted Assemblyman Baugh's office and was informed that the funds have been diverted because of budget cuts this year. The CNG compressor is due to be delivered on September 11, with a thirty-day installation by the contractor. We anticipate a dedication ceremony in late October or early November. If this committee would like to invite any individuals, please contact Michelle Tuchman or myself. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 September 2, 1998 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Miles) Introduced Gayn Winters, President Bristol Systems, who will be presenting the Y2K presentation. Blake Anderson will be chairing the Y2K Committee. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (Ooten) We are preparing our annual report and I will bring it to OMTS at the November meeting. We received our NPDES Permit in June and are required to submit a contingency plan, which we will be submitting in a couple of days. The O&M Monthly Report this month contains a staff prepared report, an Odor Readiness Plan. Plant 1 had not received any odor complaints for the summer. In August several were received. As staff worked with the neighbor they mutually discovered that the flood control channels are one of the odor sources that has been bothering the neighbor. Staff is working with Flood control to see what can be done to improve the situation. No DART update had been submitted as was noted in the minutes. Updates will be submitted as a part of the O&M Monthly Report on progress in future meetings on a quarterly basis beginning next month with a detailed schedule of action items and progress on the items. O&M Monthly Report Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report: A report for the month of July was submitted to the OMTS Committee for review. This report focuses on compliance, safety, financial data and performance measures for O & M and is intended to provide Committee members with information on a timely basis. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES (Ghirelli) The State Water Resource Control Board is updating the California Ocean Plan, which our Discharge Permit is contingent with. There are 30+ issues we will be discussing. Staff is looking into bringing the Ocean Monitoring Program in-house. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 September 2, 1998 DISCUSSION ITEM(S) 1. OMTS98-024 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE WITH SEASIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, L 009-01 Motion: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to enter into a one-year Lease Amendment with Seaside Financial Corporation for 18.09 acres of land at the north east comer of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the city of Fountain Valley with the following recommended changes: (1) The "First Amendment to Lease" agreement, page three, section 2, subsections (2) and (3)to reflect a "final" statement from Lessee. (2) A revision of the date from August 30, 1999 to September 15, 1999. 2. OMTS98-025 INSTALLATION OF PARAMETRIC EMISSIONS MONITORING SYSTEM ON THE CENTRAL GENERATION SYSTEM ENGINES Motion: Moved, seconded and carded to authorize the General Manager to: (1) Authorize staff to enter into an Agreement with Advanced Engine Technology Corporation (AETC)to provide engineering services to design, install and certify a Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines, for an amount not to exceed $342,000. (2) Authorize staff to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with a source testing firm to provide air emissions monitoring in support of installation of the Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines, for an amount not to exceed $95,000. OMTS Committee requests regular project updates as all phases begin. 3. OMTS98-026 FULL SCALE DEMONSTRATION OF PRIMARY EFFLUENT FILTER Motion: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Schreiber Corporation to provide a Fuzzy Filter®unit for a one-year test, for an amount not to exceed $150,000. 1` 1 Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 September 2, 1998 4. OMTS98-027 IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR QUALITY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (AIMS) Motion: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Data Solutions Group, LLC for the development of a written implementation plan, purchase of an off-the-shelf software, and customization, population, and commissioning of the Air Quality Information Management System (AIMS), for an amount not to exceed $127,000 with the following condition: Review by General Council regarding liability issue. 5. OMTS98-028 OFFSHORE OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM UPDATE Motion: Information only. 6. OMTS98-029 YEAR 2000 PRESENTATION Motion: Information only. 7. OMTS98-030 YEAR 2000 DATE CHANGE COMPLIANCE PROJECT Motion: Continued to next OMTS Committee meeting, October 14, 1998, to approve Professional Services Agreement for Year 2000 Compliance project management and documentation services with Bristol Systems, Inc. for$325,000 through March of 2000 with the following recommended changes: (1) Provide a specific plan of action /time frame (2) Provide a Scope of Work (3) Rank by critical needs and associated cost (4) This authorization of$325,000 is a "not to exceed"dollar amount as well as the $186,000 (this fiscal year) dollar amount. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 6 September2, 1998 OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY December OMITS meeting will not be dark, but will be held on Wednesday, December 2, 1998 and the January 1999 OMTS committee meeting will be dark. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING OMTS98-022 originally submitted July 8, 1998: Gerry Jones to provide Committee with all phases of funding and an overview of where the project is at and where it's going. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for October 14, 1998 at the District's Administrative Offices. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Submitted by: to a A, Frankie Woodside Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary lVadonldamlfl p.dtal genda\OMTS\1998VAinuteal9.2.98 Minutes.dw OMTS Meeting Dxte To a era:. 09/2/98 09/23/98 AGENDA REPORT Iem Numbv iem Numbe its Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration SUBJECT: FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE WITH SEASIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, L 009-01 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Directors enter into a one-year Lease Amendment with Seaside Financial Corporation, for 18.09 acres of land at the north east comer of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue in the city of Fountain Valley. SUMMARY In September 1995, the District's entered into a Real Property lease with Seaside Financial Corporation (formerly First Federal of California)for an 18.09-acre parcel of land located on the corner of Ward Street and Garfield Avenue. The term of the lease paid the District a sum of $60,000. plus 10% of the gross receipts of any revenue over$600,000.00. During the past two years, the District has received approximately $66,000 annually from this lease. This lease expires in September 1998. Under the terms of the original agreement, the District has the right to negotiate one, one-year extension to the lease. At July's OMTS, staff informed the Committee that they were in negotiations with Seaside Financial for a one-year extension. Attached for your guidance and information is a copy of the proposed lease amendment. Under the terms of the amendment, Seaside Financial has agreed to pay the District, a sum equal to twelve and one-half percent(12.5%) of the annual gross rental revenues of the property, with a minimum rental of$75,000.00. All other terms remain the same. Legal Counsel has been involved with the negotiations and has approved the lease as to form. Executed copies of this lease, approved as to form, by our General Counsel will be available for the Boards signature at the September Board meeting. Staff recommends that the Committee recommend execution of this amendment to the full Board. Based upon the outcome of the Strategic Plan, staff will re-bid all or a portion of this land in July 1999. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration,will make a brief presentation to the Committee. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The District will receive a sum equal to twelve and one-half percent(12.5%) of the annual gross rental revenues of the property, with a minimum rental of Seventy-five thousand Dollars ($75,000.00). \MJmV�utYry.EuupsM�11 WBJo-nI Bwr!Ipwtl�Reyrb'�2tBlW�4 FI,umY.LAYt E,c Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES 1. Not to proceed with the lease and leave the land in a vacant condition. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS EEH: fw WMo WablArp.Ute�epmUe\1Bd8Join1 BwN�peMe RepaNVBliBBlSeurv4 FnurclY.LtCb1 Yc Page 2 - OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.or .Dir. 9,68 9/24 ' AGENDA REPORT cad /S��Y Orange County Sanitation District �Lsb FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Ed Torres, Manager, Air Quality & Special Projects f./n r SUBJECT: INSTALLATION OF PARAMETRIC EMISSIONS MONITORING SYSTEM ON THE CENTRAL GENERATION SYSTEM ENGINES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole source Professional Services Agreement with Advanced Engine Technology Corporation (AETC) to provide engineering services to design, install and certify a Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines, for an amount not to exceed $342,000. 2. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with a source testing firm to provide air emissions monitoring in support of installation of the Parametric Emission Monitoring System for eight Central Generation System engines for an amount not to exceed $95,000. SUMMARY The District currently operates and maintains Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) that measure Oxides of Nitrogen (Nox) from each of the eight Central Generation System (CGS) engines. Due to aging, vendor, and Y2K reliability issues, the CEMS is placing the District in risk of non-compliance with our SCAQMD permit conditions. In addition, the cost of maintaining the CEMS has been steadily increasing due to aging of parts and equipment. Because of these concerns, staff recommends that the CEMS be replaced. A recent study evaluated replacing the CEMS with a Parametric Emissions Monitoring System (PEMS) and included identifying the types of PEMS available, installation and operating costs, and air regulatory agency certification requirements. In addition, staff evaluated the costs for replacing the CEMS with a new CEMS or upgrading our existing CEMS. The result of these studies showed that the most cost-effective option was to replace the CEMS with a PEMS. Staff is recommending to retain the services of Advanced Engine Technology Corporation (AETC) to design, install and certify with the SCAQMD a continuous pressure monitor PEMS (CPM-PEMS) for the CGS engines. AETC is being recommended because they are the only firm that currently provides the CPM-PEMS. The CPM-PEMS is desired because it offers substantial savings in annual maintenance compared to the CEMS (> 70,000/year savings compared to new CEMS, > $150,000/year saving compared to existing CEMS) and it will enable the District to optimize engine fuel consumption with air emissions (Nox and Volatile Organic K%I,N WBTl Uu VWR RW"00 PEMS.OWS COMMnlEE. x Rw W, VIM Page 1 Compound (VOC)). Other PEMS technologies cannot cost-effectively provide this optimization feature. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This project is included in the approved 1998/99 CIP budget for$550,000. The estimated project cost is $522,500 of which $342,000 will be used to contract with AETC for design, installation and certification of the Parametric Emissions Monitoring System (PEMS). Ninety-five thousand dollars ($95,000) will be used to contract with a source-testing firm to measure air emissions during the engine mapping and certification. Staff estimates $38,000 for internal staff labor and materials with the remaining $47,500 for contingency at 10%. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CORE sec. 9, page 10,4a) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This project is categorized under Utility Systems. Eighty-five thousand dollars ($85,000) was budgeted in the 1997/98 CIP to study PEMS alternatives and install PEMS on one CGS engine. Only $10,000 of the $85,000 has actually been spent since installation of PEMS on one engine was not implemented. The total budget for this project is $560,000 ($10,000 in 1997/98, $550,000 in 1998/99) with $532,500 projected to be spent. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The SCAQMD permit conditions for the CGS engines require that we continuously monitor Nox emissions, except during routine maintenance of the CEMS. Due to aging of the CEMS, the units have been experiencing frequent failures (an average of 41 per year over the past four years). Due to the heightened level of reporting and compliance certification under the new Title V Federal Operating Permit, staff if concerned that we are at risk of violation due to the unreliable operation of the CEMS. Plant no. 2 is expected to begin operating under their Title V permit by January 1999. In addition, Graseby, STI, the manufacturer of our CEMS has put OCSD on notice that they will no longer support the system after their existing inventory of parts is depleted. Also, they will not be upgrading the CEMS computer to make it Year 2000 compliant. For these reasons as well as the escalating cost of maintaining our CEMS, staff recommends that we replace the CEMS. A feasibility study was recently conducted to evaluate PEMS as an alternative to the current CEMS. The report identified two types of PEMS. The first PEMS utilizes existing engine sensors (CET-PEMS), has a lower initial capital cost, but has a higher annual maintenance cost. The second PEMS (CPM-PEMS) requires installation of new sensors that will continuously monitor peak firing pressure. This system has higher X My NekmBPWie„VynMa RayeM PEMS-OM1G CW.M EOz RwwE Ml� Page 2 capital costs but lower annual maintenance costs. Both PEMS options were shown to be more cost-effective than upgrading our current CEMS or replacing it with a new CEMS. The following table summarizes the capital, annual O&M, and annualized costs (includes capital) for the two PEMS options, the two CEMS options and the do-nothing option. The $95,000 for source-testing is included in the cost of both PEMS options. Option Capital Costs Annual 0&M Cost Annualized Cost ' CET-PEMS $193,000 $ 42,000 $ 68,000 GPM-PEMS $438,000 $ 18,000 $ 77,000 UPGRADE CEMS $240,000 $ 99,000 $131,000 NEW CEMS $480,000 $ 99,000 $163,000 DO NOTHING $0 $169,000 $169,000 Evaluated over 10 year period at 6% interest rate. Staff is recommending installation of the CPM-PEMS. Annual maintenance of the CPM-PEMS is estimated at $18,0001yr compared to the current annual CEMS maintenance cost of $169,000. Based upon an installation cost of$522,500, the payback period for the GPM-PEMS is 3.5 years. The CET-PEMS option has a lower annualized cost compared to the recommended CPM- PEMS option. However, there are other benefits the CPM-PEMS offers that are not available with the CET-PEMS. These are: 1. Easy parametric control of the engine to optimize fuel consumption. Nox emissions, and VOC emissions. With the stricter emissions requirements that will be placed on CGS engines in a few years under SCAQMD Rule 1110.2, optimization of these parameters will become very important to ensure compliance and cost-effectively manage fuel consumption. 2. The CPM-PEMS can easily monitor other pollutants such as Carbon Monoxide (CO) and Volatile Organic Compounds(VOC's). The CET-CPM requires additional engine parameters to be monitored such as fuel type, fuel flow and the energy value of the fuel. Monitoring these additional parameters is more complicated, less accurate and potentially more expensive. Because these engines are so large and due to the lowering of emissions standards, under SCAQMD Rule 1110.2, it is very likely that we will need to monitor or VOC's and CO in the future. Implementation of this project will be conducted in three phases. Phase I consist of determining SCAQMD certification requirements for the PEMS and developing preliminary design of the PEMS hardware and network integration system. Phase II will involve installing the CPM-PEMS on one engine at Plant no. 2, from design to SCAQMD certification. Once SCAQMD acceptance is obtained and the level of documentation and network integration is defined, implementation of the PEMS on the remaining seven engines should go very smoothly. This phase will also involve evaluating the maintenance savings predicted from the installation of continuous pressure monitors. Phase III will be to install and certify with SCAQMD, the most cost-effective PEMS on the remaining seven CGS engines. Justification for Sole Source Contract AETC is a nationally recognized engineering consulting firm specializing in engine optimization an air emission monitoring. AETC provided services to OCSD during Central Generation System (CGS) startup in 1992- AETC has been pioneering parametric control and air emissions monitoring of engines, and to our knowledge, is the only firm that has successfully installed and X:My.Ylebmb2UJaaWpaMe Re MP 6.OARS GOMMR E.dm Reread: Mn Page 3 commissioned a CPM-PEMS. Staff is aware of two other firms that provide PEMS installation services, but their services are limited to the CET-PEMS. For the reasons described earlier, staff recommends installation of the CPM-PEMS. In addition, OCSD did receive a proposal ` from one of the two firms that provide CET-PEMS services (Cooper-Bessemer) and their costs are more than $100,000 higher than similar services provided by AETC. Therefore, staff feels that AETC's costs are competitive. ALTERNATIVES All CEMS alternatives are more costly to the District. The no-nothing option places the District in high risk of future non-compliance with SCAQMD permit conditions. The CET-PEMS option has a lower annualized cost compared to the CPM-PEMS over the ten year period evaluated. However, the CPM-PEMS option offers additional benefits as described above that are important to the District and will likely reduce the costs to the District for future compliance under SCAQMD Rule 1110.2. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable ATTACHMENTS None EMT:pjm M.1vp.CnbnlWTJaesUpoMe R�"S PENS�OWS COMM R E Mc RornoE. Wlo Page 4 OMTS COMMITTEE nxeuoq Dm TOBa.o/qr. en»e uz3/ee AGENDA REPORT `�ca� 'isPe°f Orange County Sanitation District Y FROM: Robert Ooten Director of Operations & Maintenance Originator: Edward Torus, Manager of Air Quality & Special Projects f.in, � SUBJECT: FULL SCALE DEMONSTRATION OF PRIMARY EFFLUENT FILTER GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Schreiber Corporation to provide a Fuzzy Filter® unit for a one-year test for an amount not to exceed $150,000. SUMMARY The Strategic Plan currently being developed by CDM includes discussions of new technologies that show promise for further use by OCSD. One of these technologies is Primary Effluent Filtration (PEF). Recent tests by OCSD of several PEF filters indicated that simple filtration can remove some contaminants from primary effluent efficiently and at lower cost than using secondary biological treatment. One of the filters tested, the Fuzzy Filter®, is a relatively recent development in filters that has some unique characteristics that make it attractive for possible use by the District. Questions about long-term performance and maintenance of the Fuzzy Filter® could not be addressed in these short-term tests. In addition, accurate full-scale costs could not be developed from the pilot-scale unit due to design differences. Therefore, a long-term (one year) Fuzzy Filter®test using a large (3 MGD) filter is proposed to provide the additional information that is needed to evaluate this technology. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This project is included in the approved 1998-99 budget for$207,000, of which $150,000 would be used for the equipment rental. The remaining $57,000 will be used for installation, monitoring, and evaluation of the filter. No additional funds are being requested. At the completion of the tests, the Districts will have the option to purchase the equipment for an additional payment of$135,000 (for a total cost of$285,000), but there will be no obligation to purchase it. v..ao„mun.oauw.mueo..,wiwrnrs.ww ropena: a«,..a Page 1 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: sec. e, p. 10, 3(e)) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This project is categorized under Research & Development. $80,000 was budgeted in the 1997-98 CIP budget to study pilot-scale PEF's. $142,000 was actually spent with the majority of costs being for internal staff labor. With the $207,000 budgeted in this current fiscal year, total expected expenditure for the PEF project is $349,000. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In primary effluent filtration (PEF), physical filtration is used to treat primary effluent to remove contaminants without using secondary biological treatment (trickling filters or activated sludge processes). Filtration is a relatively low cost form of treatment, so if PEF can meet the appropriate effluent quality requirements, substantial cost reductions could be achieved by using PEF instead of secondary treatment. Shifting part of the processing duty from secondary treatment to PEF will increase the capacity of the existing secondary treatment facilities. In 1982, the Districts tested PEF using a sand filter. These tests indicated that PEF could meet the Districts' TSS and BOD ocean discharge requirements, but further work was not carried out for several reasons: (1) secondary treatment facilities were under construction; (2) the status of the NPDES 301(h) permit waiver was unclear; and (3)full- scale PEF had not been used elsewhere in the country. The current NPDES permit will provide flexibility to use cost-effective treatment options such as PEF to meet the District's effluent discharge requirements. Although additional PEF technologies have become available since the 1982 tests, no directly comparable data have been available to evaluate the options. Accordingly, staff conducted a PEF test program in 1997 to generate data the District would need to make informed decisions about the role of PEF in its future operations. One of the filters tested was the Schreiber Fuzzy Filter®. This is a relatively new product that had not been tested as a primary effluent filter previously. It uses a synthetic material as the filter bed and requires a much smaller filter than its competitors to process the same amount of water. The recent tests confirmed that filters can remove substantial amounts of contaminants from primary effluent. The tests also indicated that this can be done with operating costs that are 50-75% lower than the costs for activated sludge treatment. Based upon the pilot study work PEF will cost between $2.91-$6.77/million gallons treated while onaww,uiwvm,q„manw.ro.noarts.c.^m„rone: Page 2 ,.0 conventional activated sludge costs the District approximately $13.72/million gallon treated. A preliminary analysis was conducted to evaluate the potential savings and benefits for full-scale implementation of PEF. A complete cost/benefit analysis was not performed at this time due to the uncertainties in full-scale capital installation costs. These capital installation costs are being developed as part of the Strategic Planning process. The cost savings analysis was conducted for two treatment scenarios. Scenario 1 consists of adding PEF to our current treatment processes for meeting ocean outfall discharge requirements. Scenario 2 consists of adding PEF and providing 80 MGD secondary treated water to the Ground Water Replenishment Project (GWRP). Cost Item Scenario 1 Scenario 2 BiosolidsDisposal $600000 $100000 Electricity $ 90 000 $262 000 Chemicals $400 000 $400 000 Natural Gas $460 000 $300 000 Total Savings $1,550000 $540,000 In addition to the cost savings, both scenario's will result in a 25% increase in the capacity of our activated sludge systems due to the decrease in organic materials being removed by the PEF's. Full-scale testing of filters, especially of the Fuzzy Filter®, is needed to confirm and extend the test results. Unlike the other filters tested, the Fuzzy Filter® does not have much operating history treating either primary or secondary effluent at full scale with which to compare the pilot-scale results. In full-scale equipment, differences in filter backwashing effectiveness or mechanical reliability of certain moving parts, for example, may be important. This can only be determined with larger equipment. Also, long-term operating changes, such as possible grease build-up in the filter bed or erosion of the filter media, can only be investigated in a longer test program. Finally, since large Fuzzy Filters® have not been manufactured, firm capital cost estimates for equipment of the size the District might use are not available. The need to evaluate various design options for large units contributes to this uncertainty, and a large filter will have to be built and tested to resolve some of the outstanding questions. The proposed project will test an 8' x 8' (3 MGD) Fuzzy Filter®for one year. This test is expected to answer the questions and resolve the uncertainties about using this filter for PEF. At the end of the test period, the District will have the option to purchase the unit at a below-market price or to return it to the manufacturer. As part of the Strategic Plan, CDM is evaluating where in the treatment process PEF should be applied, the land use requirements, and preliminary capital costs for installation. If the test is successful, and once a decision has been made by the Board about the treatment alternatives under the Strategic Plan, then staff would have the a7aom.m,.n.n�aemn�.,nww,nrs.e>w.rcouiea Page 3 information necessary to proceed with more detailed planning and preliminary design of PEF facilities. ALTERNATIVES Since the Fuzzy Filter® is a proprietary technology and the information that is needed can only be gathered through an extended test of the filter, no alternative exists to obtain this information. Without the information, further evaluation of the Fuzzy Filter® for possible PEF use by the District cannot proceed. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS None. ,uses.ew,as.anmmmms�V.noM*s.o.ne.rcw�em xsmaa: ssmla Page 4 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting DMe Toad.of Dlr. 9/2/9a 9/73/99 AGENDA REPORT a cap iS P� • Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Edward Torres, Manager of Air Quality & Special Projects SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AIR QUALITY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (AIMS) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a sole-source Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Data Solutions Group, LLC for the development of a written implementation plan, purchase of off-the-shelf software, and customization, population, and commissioning of the Air Quality Information Management System (AIMS), for an amount not to exceed $127,000. SUMMARY Air quality data, like any other environmental information, is a valuable resource that needs to be managed and understood. Currently, Staff manually generates, gathers, and manages data related to the air quality compliance program and maintains such data mostly in hard-copied documents. The increasing demands of air quality regulations, such as Title V Federal Operating Permit Program, have prompted Staff to seek software-based solutions to track the associated volume of data. Staff is recommending that a comprehensive data management system be implemented to ensure accuracy and reliability of the compliance data, which will enhance compliance assurance, and maximize the Staffs efficiency in data management and reporting of data to regulatory agencies. Staff estimates that full implementation of the data management system will result in a reduction of approximately 560 hours of staff time (or 0.27 FTE) per year currently spent locating hard copy information. During 1997-98 fiscal year, Staff retained through a competitive bidding process, Woodward-Clyde Consultants, a leading professional consulting engineering firm, to assess the District's needs for the air quality data management system and to evaluate competing data-management options. Staff also worked closely with the Information technology staff to ensure that the new system is compatible with the District's other data management systems. This effort resulted in a recommendation by the consultant to purchase and customize an off-the-shelf software package called FacTSTe/developed by Quantum Compliance Systems, Inc. Staff is now acting upon the recommendation to implement the air quality data management system in two major tasks. The first task involves a procurement of the software and development of the written implementation plan that specifies the level and x:w ,ft xawnnIDnTnMSe *M Mre ye mW&..M R.M m Page 1 r cost of customization and integration of the FacTSTA9 software into other District's data management systems. The second task involves performing required customization, population of the FacTSnm with the historical data and loading of the FacTS7""onto the District's platform. Staff is recommending to enter into a sole-source Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Data Solutions Group, LLC (EDSG) to perform the above tasks. The two principals of EDSG were the project manager and project engineer for the District's earlier work with Woodward-Clyde Consultants. Staff had selected Woodward-Clyde Consultants out of the seven consulting firms that submitted proposals because of the experience and knowledge that these two principals shared in similar projects with other clients. The two principals who have formed EDSG completed District's earlier work and demonstrated high level of technical expertise in both the air quality compliance requirements that affect the publicly owned treatment works and information technologies. They are experts with the FacTSP software. As a result, contracting with any other consultant would likely result in higher cost for the District since they will have to incorporate the learning curve associated with the FacTST"" software and the District's specific needs. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The project is included in the approved 1998-99 CIP budget for$180,000. The consultant services cost for Task 1 will be $52,000 which also includes cost for software procurement. The consultant services cost for Task 2 will be better defined in the Implementation Plan developed from Task 1 but will not exceed $75,000 for procurement of additional software user licenses and consultant services. The total consultant services cost of$127,000 represents approximately 71% of the project's budget. The completion of this project will require an additional $29,000 in District's staff time which represents 16% of the project's budget. Task 1 Task 2 Total Professional Services Agreement Costs Consultant Services $35,630 $55,000 $90,630 Software/User Licenses $16,370 $20,000 $36,370 Subtotal $52,000 $75,000 $127,000 Internal Staff Costs $9,000 $20,000 $29,000 Total $61,000 $95,000 $166,000 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CORF sec. a p. 10, Special Projects 2(a)) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Hl"q abm=B n%DATABASEzIMS%OMTS apn Ap d0k Ha.;,eE Br 8 Page 2 J This project is categorized under Information Management and Computerization. $50,000 has been spent for the District's earlier work on the air quality database system development. Total estimated project expenditure is $226,000, which includes $50,000 for the District's earlier work and $20,000 for future budget years. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background: During 1997-98 fiscal year, Staff retained through a competitive bidding process, Woodward-Clyde Consultants, a leading professional consulting engineering firm to assess the District's needs for the air quality data management system, evaluate competing data-management option in search of a software package to assist in performing air emission calculations and compliance assessment, and perform benefits analysis. The following steps, undertaken by the District's staff and consultants, are discussed below: Mao Existing Data-Manaaement Process An internal review was conducted to evaluate existing data-management requirements, current methods used for data gathering and reporting, and identify various data- management tools already in place. Mapping the existing data-management processes up front highlighted those procedures that worked well, those that should be implemented into an automated data management system, and those that are superfluous. Define System Requirements In order to identify all requirements and tasks that an ideal data-management system might perform, Staff considered the following areas and closely worked with Information Technology staff to define system requirements. ✓ Hardware configurations ✓ Security issues ✓ Compatibility with existing data-management tools ✓ Ability to generate required reports Evaluate the Options Before Staff set out to review commercially available software packages, database consultants who could provide customized applications were contacted. It was determined that the use of customized programs would be cost prohibitive and would create a dependent, ongoing relationship with the database consultants. For this reason, Staff focused its search on off-the-shelf products and reviewed 18 products through relevant literature, demo disks, and on-site demonstrations. After many demonstrations and discussions, Staff selected a product called FacTSTM by Quantum Compliance Systems, Inc. FacTSTM is user-friendly and flexible and will meet the District's requirements with the least amount of customization. KM pgbnb9TeMppgTRBRSE1am WS.,��M ft Rm � Page 3 Benefits Analysis A workshop was conducted to evaluate, prioritize, and quantify anticipated benefits provided by the data management system. Staff quantified the benefits based on expected annual labor-hour savings from implementing all the requirements and tasks that an ideal data management system might perform. Staff estimated that the full implementation of data management system would deliver reduction in approximately 560 hours of staff time per year in quantifiable benefits. The reduction in staff time primarily will result from automation of current manual steps in collection, entry, analysis, and reporting of various air quality data. In addition, new regulations such as Title V Federal Operating Permit, Enhanced Periodic Monitoring, and the State and Federal Risk Management programs require a substantial increase in the quantity of data which the District must collect and report to regulatory agencies to stay in compliance. These new regulations also require increased scrutiny of monitoring data by the regulatory agencies. The implementation of the data management system will enhance accuracy and reliability of data thereby reducing the risk of non-compliance with the regulations. It will also free staff from repetitive paper-chasing tasks, and allow them to do higher value technical activities. Project Scope: The current project marks the last step in the process— implementation of the system. In this project, professional consultant services will be utilized to conduct two major tasks: Task 1: This involves a procurement of FacTST software, detailed analysis of process work flow, limited population of the system with real data to determine the level of customization required, and the development of a detailed written implementation plan that outlines the steps and costs required for customization and system population. Task 2: This involves performing required customization of the system, populating the systems with historical data, loading the system onto the District's platform, conducting user training, and developing protocol for future data acquisition. Sole-Source Justification for Contracting with EDSG: Two principals of EDSG, Mr. Glenn Mayer and Ms. Joanne Schroeder, were the project manager and project engineer, respectively, for the District's earlier project with Woodward-Clyde Consultants. In completing the previous project, they demonstrated high level of technical expertise in both the air quality compliance requirements that affect the publicly owned treatment works and information technologies. Mr. Mayer has worked with the District's Staff for other projects and has an outstanding track record of technical expertise and project management skills. While he was with w�..yae��eswnnnnlnsnse.,,,,werts ape,m mpenae� Page 4 y' Woodward-Clyde Consultants, he was the manager of the Environmental Management Division with main emphasis in air quality issues. Mr. Mayer and Ms. Schroeder have completed and are currently working on projects that are nearly identical to the District's project. By contracting with EDSG, Staff believes that District will receive the highest level of service from a team that brings together POIW air quality and information technology specialists. Contracting with any other consultant would likely result in higher cost for the District since they will have to incorporate the learning curve associated with the FacTSTm software and the District's specific needs. ALTERNATIVES 1. Do not approve a Professional Services Agreement for this project and maintain the current level of manual data management practice. • This alternative is not desirable because it will result in lost opportunities to improve Staffs efficiency in managing the high volume of data related to air quality compliance program and to ensure accuracy and reliability of the compliance data. 2. Contract directly with software supplier, Quantum Compliance Systems, Inc. (Quantum)for implementation of the system. • This alternative is not desirable because Quantum's core business is development of software not implementation. They also do not have the expertise on air quality issues. Knowing and understanding air quality issues in a POTW environment is critical, otherwise Staff will have to dedicate significant resources educating the software supplier and performing quality checks on their work. 3. Contract with environmental consultants other than EDSG. This alternative is not desirable because it would likely result in a higher cost to the District for different consultants to incorporate the learning curve associated with the District's earlier work with Woodward-Clyde Consultants. The two principals of EDSG had represented Woodward- Clyde Consultants and are experts on FacTSTm software. CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS None H.W .GegnlpBPaMDATABPSFsm1 SapeMa,aCa W RabeP. a Page 5 DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, September 3, 1998, at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, September 3, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Don McIntyre, General Manager Jan Debay, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager John Collins David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Brian Donahue Bob Ooten, Director of O&M Burnie Dunlap, Board Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Patsy Marshall Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Eva Miner-Bradford Chris Cervellone, Acting Construction Manager Christina Shea Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Bill Brooks, Project Manager Jim Mullins, Project Manager Chuck Hodge, Project Manager Directors Absent: Gail Cain, Executive Assistant Dave Sullivan OTHERS PRESENT: Bob Zemel Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers Don Greek, DGA Consultants, Inc. Robert Finn, Brown 8 Caldwell Kim Henry, Spec Services, Inc. Phil Peterson, Spec Services, Inc. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. OCSD • P.O.en[ 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 927288127 • (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 2 September 3, 1998 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the July 9, 1998 PDC Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. REPORT OF THE BOARD CHAIR The Board Chair did not make a report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager did not make a report. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager did not make a report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering responded to questions raised by Chairman Dunlap at the August 26, 1998 Board of Directors Meeting regarding Change Order No. 4 for Contract No. 3-38-3. He indicated that there were no errors committed by the geotechnical consultant in the soils investigation and related recommendations for design and construction, and that changed conditions encountered by the contractor necessitated the change in construction methods. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Report and the Report of Construction Contracts with Potential Change Orders over Five Percent (5%). Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 3 September 3, 1998 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (Items No. 1-2) 1. PDC98-33: Receive and file a report on the progress of the Year 2000 (Y2K) Date Change Compliance Project. Information Only Item. This item was removed from the Agenda and will be presented at a future meeting. 2. OMTS98-026: Full Scale Demonstration of Primary Effluent Filter. Information Only Item. Ed Torres, Air Quality& Special Projects Manager, gave a presentation on a proposed one-year test of primary effluent filtration technology. ACTION ITEMS (Items No. 3-8) 3. PDC98-34: Ratify Change Order No. 14 to Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 with Margate Construction for a net addition amount of$30,154 and 15 calendar days, increasing the contract amount to$35,376.445. Director Collins requested that the classification of Items No. 4 and 6 be changed from "design change"to "omission, and that change order items related to the construction of the OCWD pump station be tracked separately from District's work. Director Marshall asked that an estimated contract completion date be included in the Summary of Contract Time paragraph of the change order. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve this item incorporating the above requests. 4. PDC98-35: Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, to Spec Services for a total not to exceed $2,121,748. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. 5. PDC98-36: Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for Design of Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. Pi-37, with Brown & Caldwell for a total not to exceed $1,993,000. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. 6. PDC9B-37: Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for Area Classification Studies for Plants No. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35, with Brown & Caldwell for a total not to exceed 5488,600. Director Swan requested that staff investigate the possibility of the District's insurance carrier participation in this study. Staff will report the results of their investigation at the September Board Meeting. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting ' Page 4 September 3, 1998 7. POC98-38: Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA)with Rawl Pelagos, Inc. (Pelagos) for inspection and measurement of ballast rock around the 120-inch Outfall, Job No. J-39, for a total amount not to exceed $32,120. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve this item. B. PDC98-39: 1) Approve a budget amendment of$325,000 for a total project budget of $1,390,600; and 2)Approve plans and specifications for the Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Fountain Valley Channel to Orangethorpe Avenue; Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue; and Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Marian Sewer to Carson Creek Channel, Contract No. 2-34R. Motion: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY None. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 8, 1998. Minutes of the PDC Committee Meeting Page 5 September 3, 1998 ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Submitted by:: Gail Cain PDC Committee Secretary x�.o eme,ywxwxce�.sEwe;,,�roeea PDC COMMITTEE neeneyom TOB .foi,. 9/3/98 9/23/98 AGENDA REPORT Oem Nubv m IR Numbe �ocae-ar Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwi erector of Engineering Originator: Jim Mullins, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-33-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, to Spec Services for a total not to exceed $2,121,748. SUMMARY In September 1997, Staff informed the PDC Committee of the approach to improve the reliability of the plant electrical distribution systems. This approach involved two projects: a) Job No. J-33-1, an existing electrical reliability project with additional design solutions for previously identified electrical problems. b) Job No. J-25-4, a study project to identify and resolve other potential electrical problems in the systems. The Board awarded the PSA for J-25-4 in July 1998. The J-33-1 project began in 1993 with a study by Carollo Engineers focusing on plant standby power and reliability issues. Staff has discovered additional related reliability problems. Solutions for several of these problems have been designed and implemented. The rest will be addressed now. Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, will solve the problems Of: • Maintaining wastewater processing when power failures occur • Electrical equipment overloads • Inability of electrical equipment to withstand the stress of short circuits • Electrical equipment deterioration and failure due to exposure to moisture and dust The solutions to these problems are high priority that cannot be delayed until the J-25-4 studies are done. Staff has reviewed proposals from four firms. Based on the proposal evaluation and interviews, Staff recommends approval of a PSA for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, to Spec Services. Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This agreement is for an amount not to exceed $2,121,748. The funds for this project, $17,206,000, are contained in the FY 1998-99 Capital Improvement Budget. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 4.c, Inter-Plant and Joint Facilities) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Reference the Budget Information Table attached. This project is necessary to ensure compliance with safety requirements at Plants No. 1 and 2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background and Proiect Description In September 1997, Staff informed the PDC Committee of the existing electrical power system problems at Plants No. 1 and 2. Staff discussed the importance of this issue, the approach to resolving the problems, and the estimated cost involved. Each plant has a complex electrical distribution system with dozens of transformers and other major electrical equipment. The equipment is aging and the reliability of many system components has decreased. In addition, demand on the plant electrical distribution system has increased because: • The District has made a conversion from engine-driven equipment to electric motors because of the tightening of AQMD emission regulations. This :onversion requires alternate power sources for the critical motors in order to achieve the same level of process reliability as the engines. • The plant process systems have outgrown the electrical power systems that support them. The increased demand on the electrical system has created overloading of major electrical equipment, inadequacies in the automatic system safeguards, and "bottle- necks" in the electrical systems. As a result, the risk of electrical system failure has increased and the "bottle-necks" significantly limit system expandability to support the Strategic Plan through the year 2020. It is critical that the electrical distribution system is reliable and have redundant components sized appropriately for peak loads. Staff has made a significant effort to review the system and identify problems. Consequently, Staff has created the following two projects: Page 2 a. Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1 In 1993, Carollo Engineers performed a study, J-33, to evaluate the reliability of the existing treatment plants and determine related standby power needs and capabilities. Staff found from this study, shortfalls of standby generator capacity for maintaining wastewater flow through the plants during power failures that may occur during peak flow conditions. Subsequent to the J-33 study, Staff has discovered additional safety related problems: • Overloading of electrical equipment • Insufficient electrical equipment capacity to withstand the stress of short circuits • Electrical equipment deterioration and failure due to exposure to moisture and dust This project provides for final design and construction to eliminate these known safety and reliability problems. b. Electrical Power System Studies, Job No. J-25-4 This project will provide the following for the plant electrical systems: • Identifying further electrical problems • Recommending economical solutions • Developing a strategy for plant electrical power system expansion through the year 2020 (This work is not in the District's Strategic Plan), The PSA for Job No. J-25-4 was approved by the Board in July 1998. The project has already begun. Consultant Selection Procedure Staff solicited proposals for Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, Job No. J-33-1, from eight firms. Four teams responded: • Black & Veatch • Carollo Engineers • M. A. Francis & Associates • Spec Services A seven-member evaluation team reviewed and ranked the proposals based on the following criteria developed by Staff and as specified in Board Resolution No. OCSD 98-8: • Project approach and understanding of scope • Applicable corporate experience • Applicable team qualifications • Team organization and use of subconsultants Page 3 Based on the proposal evaluation and consultant interviews, Staff ranked the four firms and selected Spec Services as the top-rated firm. Spec Services has included a subconsultant to perform a minor part of the work. The most significant technical advantages of their proposal included: • Best experience level and qualifications of staff • Best demonstrated understanding and approach to the Scope of Work • Only firm having all involved staff in one local office • Only firm with integrated staff approach to all scope elements Staff has negotiated with Spec Services to clarify their approach and has prepared a PSA for Board approval. ALTERNATIVES No cost-effective alternatives to the comprehensive studies are available. Delays in the award of the PSA will postpone necessary reliability and safety-related improvements. CEQA FINDINGS This project is a portion of the previously approved Master Plan/EIR. The Master Plan was prepared by Carollo-Boyle, JV. Jones & Stokes prepared the EIR. The final EIR was approved July 19, 1989. The Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services 4. Summary of Staff Evaluations of Proposals JCM:jam G:YdglobaRAgenda Draft RepoftNDCV-331AR090398.doc Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS JOB NO. J-33-1 ,��Va E f tgg 7y a FIIfiINALt OURRENZ PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS --THIS PhOYOBED ESTIMA ED ESTIMATED; /P�O:fECT(�'ASIC -"11 ORIZED PRdJEOT_. 13UDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZALION HTOTAL' 1`� E1tPENDITURE OOMFlETE' 1n ° `r 'f eGDbET �BUDbET4 MCREgSE' 1I1U63iET TO DATE REOUEBT AUTHORtZgTION TOT/ATE TODATEj9i� Y it �, 4 p ei IY Y WtxY}, .� 1 J41 4 / {{G �.yF' S yy .yy������ �r �61.T \- '� �4�' . n if<� a� 5A '. Xe ,`Pu. K 1 1{N'h' 4 f rg G Al e .. �. .axR -; -i�5 .fi.r >r .a. . -.'.i i..::� 'a7 x6„ ♦.1 ' .0 :'h.u. Preliminary Design Consultant(Note 1) $ 468,800 $ 468,800 $ 46B,80C $ 468,800 It 468,800 100% Previous Staff Support (Note 2) 1 It 789,200 1$ 789,200 $ 789,200 It 789.200 1 $ 789,200 100% Consultant $ 760,400 $ 1,361,348 8 2,121,748 $ - 8 2,121,748 8 2,121,748 $ 0% Staff/Other $ 808,600 $ 808.600 $ 808,600 $ 808.600 $ 155,528 19% Construction $ 10,769,000 $ 10,769.000 - 0% Conlin an $ - It 3,610.000 $ (1,361,348) $ 2.248,652 $ - $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 15,391,000 $ 17,206,000 1 $ - 1 $ 17,206,000 :. $ 1,258,000 $ 2,930,348 $ 4,188.348 1 $ 1,413.528 8% NOTES: 1. Preliminary design consultant cost is for the original J-33 Study 2. Previous Staff Support costs include implementation of J-33 study recommendations. tsar nR ewsn sw Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-33-1 Standby Power and Reliability Improvements Total Project Budget: $17,206,000 Consultant: Spec Services Start Date of Project: October 1, 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Proposed Original PSA Standby Power and Reliability Improvements, $2,121,748 $0 Job No. J-33-1 %VadonWataiWp.dta`ergUOBS B CONTRACTSV-3&1 V-337-AR-PSA Status Repoit.doc 08/17/98 i Standby Power and Reliability Improvements Job No. J-33-1 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • Black& Veatch • Brown &Caldwell • Carollo Engineers • M. A. Francis&Associates • CH2MHill • Holmes & Narver • Montgomery Watson • Spec Services Brown & Caldwell, CH2MHill, and Montgomery Watson each declined to submit a proposal. Holmes & Narver was excluded from further consideration because they did not attend the pre- proposal meeting. An in-house review panel evaluated proposals from the four remaining firms. Consultant teams were interviewed on July 23, 1998. The interview panel consisted of seven members and focused on the four categories described below: 1. Project Approach and Understandina of Scope. The firrm's demonstrated understanding of the Scope of Work and their approach to the work, methodology, and the exceptions taken to the requested scope. 2. Applicable Corporate Experience. The frrm's experience as it relates directly to reliability improvements to process plant electrical power systems. 3. Applicable Team Qualifications. The project team's qualifications and experience as they relate to reliability improvements to process plant electrical power systems. 4. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants. The use of in-house resources versus the utilization of subconsultants for quality control and other spec tasks. The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firths: Black &Veatch B&V has a good understanding of the scope of work. The B&V team for this project will include Holmes & Narver and Electra-Test. B&V has much corporate experience relative to this project. H&N's experience relates more to buildings and municipalities than to process plants. B&V's approach to the project is good; they will do the longer-term scope work; H&N will do the fast- track MCC replacement work. B&V has proposed a shorter 12-month schedule. There is some concern over their coordination of the work between the two firms and between this project and the field work phase of J-25-4. Their proposal assumes that they will utilize that project's field data. This requirement for coordination of the two projects would appear to negate the proposed 12-month schedule. HMy.EhYg8 WaLOMR1c1'SU.ss1u.ss1.PR Shnmlu]M UZ Rp Wl1 Carollo Carollo has a firm understanding of the District's goals and objectives; they performed the original J-33/34 study that originated some of this project's scope items. Carollo also has been awarded the J-25-4 Power System Studies project which is just getting underway. Carollo will be teaming with Bums & McDonnell and Electra-Test, the same team used for J-254. Although Carollo has some related experience, Bums & McDonnell have the most experience with projects like this one. However, they will mostly be doing the short-term phase of the project and will provide only quality control for the longer phase portion. Carollo will be doing most of the remaining work. The team emphasized in their presentation that there would be cost and schedule savings because of the interrelationship with the team doing the J-254 work. However, this concept is difficult to quantify. The savings do not appear in the proposed prices. M. A. Francis &Associates M. A. Francis has experience in planning and design. Their architectural/structural/civil subconsultant, Grillias Pirc Rosier Alves (GPRA) has much experience with municipalities. Their experience in design of Wastewater facilities appears limited. They do not appear to have adequate staff or corporate experience for a project this size. Their proposal did not sufficiently address the scope of work. Spec Services Spec Services demonstrated a thorough understanding of the Scope of Work They will be using in-house technical staff with very little use of subconsultants. This allows for"one-stop shopping"and reduces potential coordination problems. They are the only firm of those making a proposal having all involved staff in one local office. Spec Services has extensive oil industry experience and limited wastewater experience. Each of their staff has an average of 20 years of experience. All the reviewers thought that Spec Services had the strongest technical team. There is some concern that they have only worked for one other public sector client, the City of Los Angeles. Staff will need to work closely with Spec Services to provide wastewater experience to the team. Overall, Spec Services was thought to be the strongest and best proposal. Based on the proposal evaluation and consultant interviews, the review panel ranked the Spec Services team as the top-rated consultant X My EIabyU�65l LQ`IIRACTSI.IItUSit AR� RehsM:ON1 8117198 STANDBY POWER AND RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS OCSD JOB NO. J-33-1 SUMMARY OF STAFF EVALUATIONS OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES IY Black 8 Veatch Carollo Emirs M.A.FrancisSpec Services LL I I Assoc. Reviewer 1 350.0 330.0 120.0 340.0 Reviewer 2 380.0 400.0 220.0 310.0 Reviewer 3 270.0 300.0 100.0 340.0 Reviewer 4 270.0 300.0 140.0 320.0 Reviewer 5 320.0 330.0 160.0 360.0 Reviewer 6 320.0 350.0 210.0 320.0 Reviewer 7 300.0 310.0 120.0 350.0 Total Score (2800 Points max.) 2210.0 2320.0 1070.0 2340.0 Average Score (400 Points max.) 315.7 331.4 152.9 334.3 Workforce Estimate (man-hours) 19,459 25,083 16,674 28,230 Proposed Completion Schedule 12 mo. 14 mo. 14 mo. 14 mo. Proposed Not-To-Exceed Fee $1,893,008 $2,695,695 $1,079,972 $2,121,748 Average Cost per Hour $97.28 $107.47 $64.77 $75.16 H4ry.OdbnpyaM mnEacblIJ11LLi11 VmmsvlRml Summary c PDC COMMITTEE Meetln9Dae T03LBd5. 9-03-98 9/23/98 AGENDA REPORT ltrm NumEe ne um r PDCS 3 Orange County Sanitation Di FROM: David Ludwi , iredor of Engineering Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PRIMARY CLARIFIERS AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB NO. P1-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement for Design of Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Brown and Caldwell for a total not to exceed $1,993,000. SUMMARY The District's 1989 Master Plan recommended that additional primary treatment capacity be constructed in three phases by 1998. It proposed constructing a 60-mgd facility, then adding two 36-mgd increments. The initial 60-mgd facility, Clarifiers No. 6-15 (Job No. P1-33), was completed in 1992. The remaining two phases were combined and a design contract was awarded to Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers in 1991. Influent flows did not increase as indicated in the 1989 Master Plan. In addition, the District's Capital Improvement Project (CIP) was delayed following the Orange County bankruptcy in 1994. As a result, the design contract for Job No. P1-37 was cancelled in 1996 upon completion of the Preliminary Design Report. The District is now developing a new Strategic Plan which calls for an additional 96 mgd primary treatment capacity in place by 2002. The additional capacity is required to accommodate future flows and the need is independent of decisions on the Groundwater Replenishment System and level of treatment. Staff has solicited proposals from seven firms qualified for the project. Based on the proposal evaluation, interview process, and staff negotiations conducted in accordance with Board Resolution No. OCSD 98-8, Staff recommends approval of a PSA for design and construction support services for Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, to Brown and Caldwell for$1,993,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The following table summarizes previous contract amounts and subsequent addenda: Date Item Amount 1/23/91 Award PSA $1,468,400 4/26/95 Issue Addendum #1 1 $538,330 Total Authorized Amount to Date $ 2,006,730 Page 1 The following identifies the new contract amount ($1,993,000) and determines the amount of this authorization request ($194,985): Total Funds Authorized to Date $2.006,730 Expenditure to Date $208 715 Remaining Authorized Funds $1,798,015 New Contract Amount $1,993,000 Remaining Authorized Funds $1,798,015 This Authorization Request $194,985 See attached "Budget Information Table." BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: Plant 1, 2-6) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The original authorized budget for this project was $38,450,000. The proposed revised budget for this project is now $62,127,000. The previous scope of work did not include evaluation of optimum chemically-enhanced primary treatment methods; the existing Primary Clarifiers No. 6-15; sludge thickening, and transport facilities; and a new trickling filter feed from the new primary facilities. Increased costs can also be attributed to added contingencies, higher staff overhead rates, inflationary costs over time, and the increased capacity needed pursuant to new information obtained in the Strategic Plan. See attached "Budget Information Table." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background and Proiect Description This project includes design of an additional 96 mgd of primary treatment facilities and improvements to existing Primary Clarifiers No. 6-15. The 96 mgd is based on recommendations in the Strategic Plan and will provide capacity to the year 2010. The additional capacity is required to accommodate future flows and the need is independent of decisions regarding implementation of the Groundwater Replenishment System or level of treatment. The consultant will prepare a design memoranda and perform all design and associated work necessary to prepare complete detailed plans Page 2 and specifications which constitute complete contract documents for the construction of items A, C, and the designated part of item D below. A project report will be prepared and the recommended improvements will be presented to the Board of Directors, prior to completion of the final design. The District's goal is to design chemically-enhanced primary treatment facilities to meet our discharge permit limits of 100 mg/L Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and 60 mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS)without further treatment. Achieving this goal will reduce our operating costs for secondary treatment. Staff has made this important concept an integral part of the project. In addition to the design work described above, the consultant will perform the following services as described in the Scope of Work: A. Primary Clarifiers 16—31 with a total capacity of 96-mgd. Verify the design criteria developed for Job No. P1-33 and included in the Preliminary Design Report dated March 1996. B. Survey and evaluation of current technologies. Survey existing technology for enhanced primary treatment or other physical-chemical treatment methods. Consider both U.S. and foreign design and determine those systems or features, which have potential for implementation at the District's facilities. C. Power Building No. 7 and Related Facilities. Assess additional loads the building will assume to relieve Power Building No. 4. D. Sludge Collection. Thickening, and Transport Facilities. Evaluate options to optimize sludge transport for the new facilities and recommend modifications to the existing primary facilities. The optimized design will be incorporated into the design of the new clarifiers. Design of modifications to existing clarifiers and the addition of a sludge thickening system will be negotiated as an addendum to the PSA and, if approved, incorporated into the construction documents. E. Trickling Filter Feed from Primary Effluent Junction Box. Evaluate the value of and means of serving the trickling filter systems from the new primary facilities. The final design services for this scope element will be negotiated as an addendum, if appropriate. F. Rehabilitation of the Existing Primary Treatment Facilities. Perform, with District staff, a survey of the existing primary facilities. The Consultant will describe the condition of all major pipe runs, structures, and equipment. The consultant will also indicate the urgency of any problems and will recommend improvements and provide estimated costs for the improvements. The Strategic Plan may change the focus or specific elements of this project. Final recommendations are expected in November 1998 and Board approval is anticipated in June 1999. Page 3 Consultant Selection Procedure Staff solicited proposals from seven firms qualified for the project. Four teams responded: • Brown and Caldwell • Carollo Engineers • Lee & Ro • Camp Dresser & McKee An eight-member evaluation team reviewed and ranked the proposal based on the following criteria developed by Staff and as specified in Board Resolution No. OCSD 98-8: • Overall experience and qualifications of firm • Applicable related project experience • Applicable recent project experience • Team Organization and use of Subconsultants • Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work The eight-member evaluation team of District Staff included representatives from Engineering, Operations, Construction Management, and Plant Automation. Based on the quality of the proposals, the evaluation team decided to interview all four firms. The evaluation team met on July 7, 1998 to hear the oral presentation from each of the proposing firms. Each team was allotted a 45-minute time period to make a presentation outlining their approach. The teams were then given a 30-minute period to answer specific questions from the evaluation team. Based on the proposal evaluation and consultant interviews, Staff ranked the four firms and selected Brown and Caldwell as the top-rated firm. The most significant technical advantages of their approach included: • Prior involvement in the project • Best demonstrated understanding and approach • Knowledge and commitment to provide optimum chemically-enhanced treatment Following the ranking process, Staff opened the sealed fee proposals of the qualified firms. Brown and Caldwell's team submitted the lowest fee proposal for the requested Scope of Work. Staff has met with Brown and Caldwell to clarify their approach and has prepared a PSA for Board approval. Page 4 ALTERNATIVES Not proceeding with P1-37 (NO ACTION). The no action alternative could: • Result in future violations of the District's Ocean Discharge limits • Impede future EPA/Regional Water Quality Control Board approval of secondary treatment waivers • Prevent the identification of cost effective process improvements. This may result in continued higher costs and continued process inefficiencies. CEQA FINDINGS Final 1989 Master Plan EIR approved on July 19,1989. and Notice of Determination filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to provide engineering services CJH:jam G:VaglobaAAgenda Draft ReportsWDCW13�1.37 AR.Eol Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Primary Clarifiers and Related Facilities Job No. P1-37 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT?ASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design Consultant (PSA) $ 3,170,000 $ 3,170,000 S 2,005730 $ 194,985 $ 2201, ,715 $ 208,715 9% OCSD Staff, Design $ 877,500 $ 877,500 $ 877 500 $ 877,500 $ 150,000 17% Construction Contract $ 43,649,000 $ 43.649.000 $ - $ 0% OCSD Staff,Ins ecVConsiruct $ 3,467,000 $ 3,467,000 $ - $ 0% Conlin enc $ 10,202,000 $ 10.202.000 $ - E 0% Other ' $ 761,500 $ 761.500 $ - $ 0% TOTAL $ 38,450.000 $ 62,127,000 $ - $ 62,127,000 S 2,884,230 $ 194,985 $ 3,079,215 $ 358,715 12% ' Sails contrad.Survey contract,Testing Contras,Legal Fees,Equipment G:4,Iglobalbgenda raponsPl 37BUMETPI-37 Revised 05295E Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals* • CH2M Hill, Inc. • Brown and Caldwell • Lee & Ro, Inc. • Camp Dresser& McKee • Montgomery Watson • Carollo Engineers • Black &Veatch CH2M Hill declined to submit a proposal. Black &Veatch and Montgomery Watson joined Carollo Engineers for this project. As a result, four consulting firms submitted proposals on June 8, 1998. Proposals were reviewed and ranked by an in-house review panel from June 8 to July 7, 1998. The review panel consisted of eight members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10, 10 being best, in seven categories described below: 1. Total Experience—Rates the team's overall total number of years experience performing engineering services 2. Applicable Related Project Experience—Rates the team's overall total number of years experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to study and design of primary treatment facilities 3. Applicable Recent Projects—Rates the team's recent experience and roles performing engineering services as it relates directly to study and design of primary treatment fadlltie� 4. Applicable Staff Qualifications—A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to study and design of primary treatment facilities 5. Team Organization and Use of SubconsuRerds—Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant staff and/or subcensullants to consultant team 6. Project Approach and Understanding of the Scope of Work—Rates the team's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown 7. Value of the Firm(s) —Rates the firm(s)past experience with the District's, overall reputation with the District's, size and depth of the the whole firn(s), location of the team members, etc... rwme.ramm:ama¢sw o..n repmnwocwr3nsun«noma« e..a.a-Wises 1 a The four proposals were evaluated and all four teams were interviewed on July 7, 1998. After reviewing and grading the proposals and conducting the interviews, the four consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached ranking results of the four firms: 1. Brown and Caldwell 2498 points 2. Carollo Engineering 2341 points 3. Lee & Ro, Inc. 1919 points 4. Camp Dresser 1832 points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: Brown and Caldwell Brown and Caldwell has a solid understanding of the importance of enhanced primary treatment to the District. They have a solid plan to optimize chemically enhanced primary treatment. They will be using in-house technical experts with little use of subconsultants, which allows for"one-stop shopping" and reduces potential coordination problems. They are very familiar with some of the District's problems associated with the existing primary facilities due to their involvement in the pre-design of the new primary treatment facilities. Carollo Carollo has a solid understanding of the District's goals and objectives. Team members from Black&Veatch and Montgomery Watson are incorporated in to the process optimization panel but are given a small percentage of the work. Although Carollo has had success with conventional primary treatment, it was not apparel it that Carollo would be able to design primary treatment facilities that meet the District's objective of optimizing chemically enhanced pretreatment to meet ocean discharge limits. Innovative approaches in process optimization were not clearly identified. Lee & Ro Lee & Ro demonstrated a thorough understanding of the Scope of Work. Lee and Ro has good experience with design of traditional primary clarifiers, but has provided the District with primary facilities that achieve less than desirable results. Malcolm Pirnie would be used to provide limited process support, a key factor to the success of optimum chemically-enhanced treatment design. Their approach includes use of a Computational Fluid Dynamic Model and a "test clarifier." This approach does not address the need to optimize chemically-enhanced primary clarifier design before construction of the new facilities. NaSWa51NIp1eGNApeNa WeR Re�bNIX]P13"M1Shcl sn!wl".Gx a� 2 Camp Dresser & McKee Camp Dresser & McKee has vast experience in planning, design, and construction of Wastewater Collection, Treatment, and Solids Handling facilities. Their experience in design of optimized chemically enhanced primary treatment facilities appears limited. They do not appear to have a good understanding of the problems associated with the existing primary treatment facilities. The use of so many subconsultants could cause coordination conflicts. Based on the proposal evaluation and consultant interviews, Staff selected the Brown and Caldwell team as the top-rated consultant. After ranking the proposals and interviews, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the four candidates. The top ranked consultant, Brown and Caldwell submitted the lowest fee proposal for the requested scope of work. Staff recommends Brown and Caldwell to be awarded the PSA for Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 for a total fee not to exceed $1,993,000. CJH:jam 1l donWata1\v ,da\eng\720NodgeT 13�taff evaluate.doo \UWMe'a1N1pbCNApAMa DIYII Rppa.Y`AIX.\13TS awalWb.hc RvifeG.aah sse 3 P1-37 PROPOSAL & INTERVIEW RANKING RESULTS rn w O N N IL 2 C) U w J E U ReviewerA 258.0 184.0 111.0 145.0 Reviewer B 357.0 320.0 237.0 285.0 Reviewer C 360.0 360.0 304.0 280.0 Reviewer D 298.0 312.0 275.0 235.0 Reviewer E 330.0 354.0 282.0 263.0 Reviewer F 349.0 336.0 213.0 238.0 Reviewer G 318.0 305.0 286.0 292.0 Reviewer H 228.0 170.0 211.0 94.0 Total Score 2880 Points max. 2498.0 2341.0 1919.0 1832.0 Average Score 360 Points max. 312.3 292.6 239.9 229.0 Workforce Estimate man-hours 18,196 30,143 25,662 40,645 100% Design Completion Proposed 13 Momns 14 Months 14 Months 14 Months Proposed not to exceed Fee $1,993,000 $3,922,433 $2,055,298 $3,892,000 Average Cost per Hour $109.53 $130.13 $79.47 $95.76 M:1,amlen9VoM ron..17-]1111 F,o 1Rw.Summary PDC COMMITTEE wemay oa< "I/i3/:. a 9/3/98 9/23/98 AGENDA REPORT em Number Ie Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwi irector of Engineering Originator: Morris Ying, Project Manager SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDIES FOR PLANTS NO. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-35 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA)for Area Classification Studies for Plants No. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35, with Brown and Caldwell for a total not to exceed $488,600. SUMMARY This project provides the District with a uniform documentation system for classifying potential fire and explosion hazard locations throughout the plants. In addition, this project evaluates options for modifying the facilities to bring them into compliance with the latest standards. This project will result in a hazardous location report and map that will be the basis for the electrical design of future projects. Documentation of hazardous locations is required for all existing facilities by the National Electric Code, 1999 Edition. OSHA enforces the National Electric Code. The District originally initiated this project to satisfy the need to provide clarity and consistency in applying the NFPA 820 standard to electrical design projects. When additions or modifications are made to existing facilities, the modifications will comply with NFPA 820. Staff has solicited proposals from six firms. Based on the proposal evaluation and interviews, Staff recommends approval of a PSA for Area Classification Studies at Plants No. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35, to Brown and Caldwell. In follow-up to discussion at the September PDC Committee Meeting, Engineering staff reviewed the J-35 scope of work with Finance staff, and Robert F. Driver Associates, the District's insurance broker of record. Based on the review, Finance staff and Robert F. Driver Associates concur that the scope and content of the J-35 Project require the skills and resources of a professional engineering services firm possessing experience with Standard 820 of the National Fire Protection Association's Technical Committee on Wastewater Treatment Plants. Xw dWWO. �-.roanammo.as nddddd vs„ Page 1 Specifically, the engineer will conduct wastewater treatment process investigations; perform ventilation/air Flow measurements; recommend process area design modifications; and prepare engineering drawings and records to implement Standard 820. Upon completion of Project J-35, and as specific design modifications are incorporated into the wastewater treatment process areas, these results will be shared with the District's insurance broker for use when negotiating the annual renewal of the District's Boiler and Machinery insurance program, so that potential premium cost savings can be realized. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total amount of the agreement will not exceed $488,600. The funds for this project, $488,600, are contained in the FY 1998-99 Capital Improvement Budget. The costs of remedial projects that result from recommendations of this study have not been budgeted because they are unknown at this time. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:2.a. Inter-Plant and Joint Facilities) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Reference the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The need for this system has arisen through changes in the requirements set by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and current mandates set by the National Electric Code and OSHA. The NFPA publishes a standard entitled NFPA 820. This document provides nationally recognized criteria for fire protection in wastewater treatment and collection facilities. Because NFPA 820 is widely referenced by various jurisdictions, the document was changed in 1995 from a recommended practice to a standard, containing mandatory requirements. In the interest of maintaining optimal safety in the Plants, District Staff has researched the requirements of NFPA 820 and recommends full implementation of this standard. The recommended vehicle for implementation is Area Classification Studies for Plants No. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35. This project will serve the following purposes: 1. Establish hazard classifications of specific areas and processes in the plants. In previous projects, various fragmentary codes and standards have been used. H MytlpSgMeWOCVOLPflPBMS%3] J3 ARQY1�B.NA ReuisM: ,�A Page 2 2. Identify areas where noncompliant installations were made, as well as identifying methods for reducing hazard classifications in certain areas. As with other code requirements, facilities built to meet earlier standards will generally not need to be upgraded until significant improvements are made to the facility. 3. Ensure compliance with OSHA electrical regulations and the mandates set forth in the National Electric Code. This information will be available to those involved in design, installation, inspection, maintenance, and operations of electrical equipment at all locations. The Consultant will accomplish the following tasks: 1. Research existing as-built drawings 2. Conduct field investigations and ventilation measurements of all applicable buildings and facilities 3. Meet and coordinate with OCSD personnel 4. Prepare 100+ Area Classification Drawings 5. Prepare a Hazardous Classification Report including recommendations for improvements and cost estimates The project involves more than 60 buildings, 70 clarifiers, 30 digesters, and over 3 miles of underground tunnels at both treatment plants. In addition, an air balance subcontractor will measure airflow and verify adequacy of approximately 150 ventilation systems. Staff solicited consultant qualifications from six firms: • Brown and Caldwell • Carollo Engineers • CH2M Hill, Inc. • Holmes & Narver • Montgomery Watson • Rytech, Inc. Carollo Engineers, CH2M Hill, and Montgomery Watson declined to submit proposals. Three proposals, submitted by Brown and Caldwell, Holmes & Narver, and Rytech, Inc., were evaluated. An in-house review panel interviewed these consultant teams on July 20, 1998. Brown and Caldwell surpassed the other proposing consultants in all categories. Brown and Caldwell's qualifications exceeded the others because: 1. They demonstrated a better knowledge of wastewater treatment plant processes. 2. Their project manager for this project is the chairman of the NFPA 820 committee. 3. They have a strong in-house project team with excellent credentials. H�.e•rcmd&• xmoc•me•n•s 37-Ja AR•w dd q,,W, „� Page 3 Based on the proposal evaluation and consultant interviews, Staff has selected Brown and Caldwell as the top-rated firm. Staff has prepared a PSA for Board approval to Brown and Caldwell for Job No. J-35, for a total not to exceed $488,600. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives to the mandated Area Classification Studies are available. This project is necessary to ensure compliance with OSHA safely requirements as defined by the National Electric Code, CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services MCYJam WeadWataltniglobarAgenda Draft RepodsWDCV-3 AR.92398 dot H t^D.ftaaandaWIX.3nCCRBW8ARS 31.J3 AR 06IR98.dot R-. 1/938 Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDIES FOR PLANTS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 OCSD JOB NO. J-35 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET' INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Consultant $ 67,111 $ 600,000 $ 600.000 $ 488600 $ 488.600 0% Staff $ 18,298 $ 187.000 $ 187,000 $ 187.000 $ 187,000 $ 43,184 23% Contingency $ 213.000 $ 213,000 $ $ 0% TOTAL $ 85,409 $ 1,000.000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 187,000 $ 488,600 $ 675,600 1 $ 43,184 23% The current budget reflects a revised a$$ossment of the project scope,Me revised overhead allocation method for staff costs and Me Inclusion of a contingent,factor, H:Wp,dWgobs conbec al-35 budgetbl Revised 721I98 -e1 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-35 Area Classification Studies for Plants No. f and No. 2 Total Project Budget: $1,000,000 Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Start Date of Project: September 23, 1998 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs Proposed Original PSA Area Classification Studies for Plants No. 1 and $488,600 $0 No. 2. G9nlg1obaMgenda DIOR RepoftTDCUJS-AR-PSA Status Report.doc 08/04/98 a STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDIES FOR PLANTS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 JOB NO. J-35 The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: Brown and Caldwell Carollo Engineers CH2M Hill, Inc. Holmes & Narver Montgomery Watson Rytech,Inc. Carollo Engineers, CH2M Hill, and Montgomery Watson declined to submit proposals. Three valid proposals by Brown and Caldwell, Holmes & Narver, and Rytech, Inc. were submitted and were evaluated. An in-house review panel interviewed these three consultant teams on July 20, 1998. The interview panel consisted of seven members using the following category of evaluation criteria. 1. Protect Approach and Understanding of Scope. Consultant's demonstrated understanding of the Scope of Work and their approach to the work, methodology, task breakdown, and any exceptions taken to the requested work. 2. Applicable Protect Experience. Consultant's experience as it relates directly to the number of years of experience performing engineering services as it relates directly to this type of study in wastewater facilities. 3. Applicable Staff Qualifications. A comparison of the team's educational background and professional qualifications as they relate to this type of study in wastewater facilities. 4. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants. Addresses the appropriateness of assignments to consultant's in-house staff and/or subconsultant to form a strong team. H1wR.M np Ol 6CA ACTS WS PR SYM vnluvManA1¢tl¢ R-i .18 i19 1 The three proposals were evaluated and all three teams were interviewed on July 20, 1998. After reviewing and grading the proposals and conducting the interviews, the three consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The following summarizes the attached scores: 1. Brown and Caldwell 182 points 2. Rytech, Inc. 152 points 3. Holmes & Narver 117 points The following is a summary of how the evaluation team collectively viewed the firms: Brown and Caldwell Brown and Caldwell has a solid understanding of the scope of work. Their knowledge of safety requirements best suits the primary purpose of the Area Classification Project. They will be using in-house technical experts with little use of subconsultants, which allows for a "one-stop shopping" and reduces potential coordination problems. Project Manager, Mr. Garr Jones, currently serves as Chairman of the NFPA 820 Committee, which is the foundation of this project. They are also very familiar with District wastewater operations. Rytech, Inc. Rytech, Inc. is stronger in the petrochemical industry than the wastewater industry. They will be a good resource for providing future remedial work. Tha overuse of subconsultants weakened their team on this project. Holmes & Narver Holmes & Narver demonstrated a fair knowledge of wastewater industry. Their knowledge of NFPA 820 application, however, is limited. Their project team did not understand the extent of the project. During the interview, they discussed a treatment process that the District does not have. Based on the proposal evaluation and consultant interviews, Staff selected the Brown and Caldwell team as the top-rated consultant. After ranking the proposals and interviews, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the three candidates. The fee amounts are included in the attached Summary of Staff Evaluation of Proposals for Consulting Services Table. X:Mq.Cb'e�.lOB56 WMMCTSY35U.35-AR ShllwaNetlmNlaO¢ gwieO:OYtb➢9 2 1 Staff recommends approval of a PSA for Area Classifications Studies at Plants No. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35, to Brown and Caldwell for a total fee not to exceed $488,600. MCY:jam R,Wp.dhN,puom a fAMRACfSU3M1V -AR BMtahtluptlervlle.Cx RwfiN:WIM 3 8/18198 AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDIES FOR PLANTS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 OCSD CONTRACT NO. J-35 SUMMARY OF STAFF EVALUATIONS OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Brown s Holmes& Rytech,Inc LL Calwell Newer Reviewer 1 34.0 21.0 28.0 Reviewer 2 36.0 27.0 31.0 Reviewer 3 34.0 14.0 28.0 Reviewer 38.0 22.0 30.0 Reviewer 5 40.0 33.0 35.0 Total Score(200 Points max.) 182.0 117.0 152.0 Average Score(40 Points max.) 36.4 23.4 30.4 Workforce Estimate (man-hours) 4790• 3,034 9,046 Proposed Completion Schedule 240 days 240 days 240 days Proposed Not-To-Exceed Fee $488,600 $358,679 $739,283 Average Cost per Hour $102.00 $118.22 $81.72 aEalhnekd fire huMmd hoummm added foreukonsultent manAmm. nb number k w mdM from cost breakdown el appradmeMy 1W ddlem per hourfm a lump sum of$42,5W. NYy.W bq'f[as[waeGrLL15 MO W rel RMw @mmy PDC COMMITTEE Meedng Dare lrok Boa. 9.3-98 9-23-98 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Numbe, Pvc 99-3 Orange County Sanitation DI FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bill Brooks, Engineer SUBJECT: REPAIR AND REHABILITATION OF MANHOLES ON EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, FOUNTAIN VALLEY CHANNEL TOORANGETHORPE AVENUE; EUCLID RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, ELLIS AVENUE TO EDINGER AVENUE; EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MARIAN AVENUE TO CARBON CREEK CHANNEL, CONTRACT NO. 2-34R GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve a budget amendment of$325,000 for a total project budget of$1,390,600. 2) Approve plans and specifications for the Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Fountain Valley Channel to Orangethorpe Avenue; Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue; and Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Marian Sewer to Carbon Creek Channel, Contract No. 2-34R. SUMMARY The project rehabilitates deteriorating manholes located in Euclid Street on the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, and the Euclid Interceptor Sewer. These aging manholes are unlined and are deteriorating due to sewer gases. Initial cost estimates prepared by the design consultant in January 1997 indicated a construction budget of$675,000. In July 1998, an engineer's estimate of$1,271,000 was provided based on the current construction bidding climate. District staff has reduced the engineer's estimate to$1,000,000 by specifying alternate liner methods. Staff recommends a budget amendment of$325,000 and approval of plans and specifications prior to public advertisement for bids. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The original engineer's estimate for construction of the project was $675,000 based on preliminary design information. After completing final design, the engineer's estimate has now been revised to $1,000,000. See Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CIP Collection System Improvement Projects, Zone 2, Item d) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) See Budget Information Table Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This project rehabilitates deteriorating manholes identified by District Maintenance Staff. The manholes are located in Euclid Street on the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, and the Euclid Interceptor Sewer. These manholes are in various stages of deterioration and must be repaired to prevent structural collapse. Sewer gases have eroded the unlined concrete manhole surfaces and the manholes need to be lined to stop the corrosion process. Design of the project has evaluated the available technologies regarding rehabilitation of sewer manholes. The rehabilitation methods evaluated included: sprayed-on polyurethane, cured-in- place fiberglass, and cast-in place polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Initial cost estimates prepared by the design consultant recommended the PVC liner method based on economy and conformance with District standards. The consultant obtained written preliminary estimates of $4,000 per manhole from contractors for the PVC liner in January 1997. In July 1998, final design estimates of$9,000 per manhole were quoted to the design consuitant. This change in cost is now reflected in the engineer's estimate. The revised engineer's estimate increased from $675,000 to $1,271,000. The primary reasons for the increase were lack of detail on the preliminary drawings and low preliminary estimates from the prospective contractors. After consulting with the design engineer on the increased cost estimate, District staff then investigated alternative PVC liner methods to further reduce the project cost. New PVC lining processes developed by a local manufacturer have become available since January 1997. The new liner method does not require the need for costly construction of fortes within the manhole. The manufacturer of the liner material has agreed to discount their product 25%for contractors bidding on this project to generate greater market exposure for the material. The consultant has determined that the use of this product should reduce the cost to about$6.000 per manhole, in turn reducing the engineer's estimate to $1,000,000. Since the engineer's estimate is$325,000 greater than the approved construction budget for this project, staff is required to obtain PDC Committee and Board approval of a budget amendment, and approval of the plans and specifications prior to advertising the project for bid. ALTERNATIVES If the Directors determine that they cannot support a budget increase, then the only alternatives that remain are to either reduce the total number of manholes to be rehabilitated or not proceed with the project. Staff believes that these alternatives are highly undesirable. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master P'an. The Final EIR was approved on July 19, 1989 and the Notice of Determination was filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table BDB:jam WeaEWatal WtglobaMgenda Draft Reports7l)M2-34R Sept 3 AR.Eot Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Fountain Valley Channel to Orangethorpe Avenue; Euclid Relief Trunk Sewer, Ellis Avenue to Edinger Avenue; Euclid Interceptor Sewer, Marian Avenue to Carbon Creek Channel Contract No. 2-34R Design Consultant PSA $ 70,000 $ 147 000 y,��'.w.' $ 147 000 $ 147,000 6 :q' $ 147.000 $ 147,000 100% CSDOC Staff,Design $ 28.000 $ 51,000 $ 61,000 $ 51,000 $ 51.000 $ 51,000 100% Construdm Contmct $ 730,000 $ 575 000 ' $ 1 000 000 $ $ $ 0% es ivz. CSDOC Staff,Inspec8on r3'R%: and Conetr.Mane omen $ 48,000 $ 95,OOD s 'i'. .a'. $ 95,000 $ st m - $ - $ 0% Cmfingency $ - $ 96 500 � ;• $ 95 500 $ p tf $ $ 0% K;t•'Y TOTAL $ 575,000 $ 1,085,800 I $ 19®0800 $ 198.000 $ 198,000 $ 198,000 19% H.Wp.fte g.4M.91RM WInto ml DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, September 9, 1998, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on September 9, 1998 at 5:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: John J. Collins, Past Board Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Barry Denes Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Norman Z. Eckenrode Gary Streed, Director of Finance Mark Leyes Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. Mark A. Murphy Robert Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Thomas R. Sall Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications William G. Steiner Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Peer Swan, Board Vice Chair Mike White, Controller Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager Committee Directors Absent: Lisa Tomko, Human Resources Manager Dawn McKinley, Sr. Human Resources Analyst George Brown, Chair Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary Burnie Dunlap, Board Chair John M. Gullil Others Present: Other Directors Present: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers None. Ryal Wheeler, Foreman & Citizen (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Director Saltarelli was appointed as Chair pro tem in Chair Brown's absence. (3) AGENDA The agenda was posted in accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2. OCSD • P.O. Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714) 962-2411 Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 y September 9, 1998 y (4) PUBLIC COMMENTS The Chair opened the meeting to public comments. Ryal Wheeler, 14832 Newland St., Midway City, CA, a District employee and citizen, addressed the Committee and expressed his concerns regarding Item No. 14 (c). Mr. Wheeler read several excerpts from a report prepared by the American Compensation Association regarding the results of a survey conducted of 116 companies on the broadbanding concept. Mr. Wheeler also expressed his personal feelings regarding broadbanding the salaries of Executive Management, Division Managers and Supervisory and Professional employees. In response to Director Collins, Mr. Wheeler advised he was not speaking on behalf of any group or individuals, but for himself. (5) APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Motion: Moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve the minutes of the July 15, 1998, Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting as drafted. (6) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR • The October FAHR Committee meeting date has been rescheduled to October 21, 1998. • Item No. 15 on the printed Agenda has been rescheduled to the October 21st meeting. (7) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER • General Manager Don McIntyre was on vacation, and Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson updated the Committee on the Kenn County Urgency Ordinance which was passed last month regarding regulating the agricultural use of biosolids. Two elements of that ordinance concern 1) how biosolids are used, monitored, transported, etc.; and 2) the $5 per ton tipping fee being charged to cover road costs. The Kenn County Board of Supervisors is reconsidering the Ordinance, especially the tipping fee provisions. Mr. Anderson advised he will keep the Directors apprised of any new developments. (8) REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager had nothing further to report. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE • Director of Finance Gary Streed advised the Committee that the Treasurer's Report was placed before them prior to the meeting in accordance with the Investment Policy and Government Code requirements. • The user fee rate structure has been delivered to the County and the tape is being processed. The total fees levied for next year are expected to be $66.9 million. The new rate structure did not result in a decrease or budget shortfall. y Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 September 9, 1998 • Mr. Streed updated the Committee regarding Ray Latrelle, a citizen of Garden Grove, who has made several presentations to the Board about parcels owned by government agencies that are not paying user fees. The issue is that some government parcels are not paying user fees and many are. Those that are not paying user fees do not have recorded square footage of development in the Assessors office. Mr. Latrelle has not understood that the Sanitation District's fees are based on square footage of building, and Garden Grove's is based on square footage of parcel. Unless it is recorded, we have no way of knowing there has been any development. Mr. Streed advised the Committee of the steps he is taking to develop a program to resolve this issue. • Director Mark Leyes cautioned staff about fulfilling too many requests from citizens such as Mr. Latrelle. Since District employees work for the Board, citizens should contact Board members if there are issues to be resolved. • Director Swan initiated a discussion regarding hiring an outside firm to review the Assessors tax rolls for parcels that may have been missed that should be paying user fees similar to the Trammel-Crow case. The Committee directed staff to agendize this item for a future meeting and come up with a strategy. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES • Human Resources Director Mike Peterman referenced Ryal Wheelers report and advised that broadbanding is something management is committed to because of the cultural change issues at the District, changes regarding flattening the organization and reducing hierarchy, and the pay for performance side of broadbanding. He indicated that opposition to broadbanding has been an issue during negotiations with the labor unions. • Mr. Peterman stated that in October, there will be an item on the Agenda under"Closed Session"to discuss the District's future labor relations and compensation strategy. • Mr. Peterman announced that a brief Closed Session is on the Agenda for tonight's meeting. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS • Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communication advised the Committee that Director Collins has responded to the"Alice In Wonderland Tax Formulas" Editorial which appeared in The Resister re user tee increases. (12) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL • Re the Trammel-Crow case, Tom Woodruff advised he has met with their lead counsel, and they have threatened two law suites against the District momentarily. Mr. Woodruff stated that if the Committee required more information, he could provide it in Closed Session. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting t' Page 4 September 9, 1998 (13) CONSENT CALENDA ITEMS (items a-d) a. FAHR98-62: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 1998: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. C. FAHR98-64: Receive and file Employment Status Report. d. FAHR98-65: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period April 1 through June 30, 1998. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 13 (b)was deleted from the Consent Calendar. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 13(a), 13(c), and 13(d) under Consent Calendar. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 13 b. FAHR98-63: Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. Committee Discussion: The Committee determined from staff that the rolling 12-month COP report was included as the last page on the COP Agenda Report. The Financial Manager has been in contact with J.P. Morgan on a daily basis to discuss rates, and staff will be watching the other remarketing agents more closely as well. Staff will be meeting early next month to develop a better monitoring program for the District. The Committee expressed disappointment that J.P. Morgan has had to be pushed to give the District a better rate performance. Motton: Moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. 14. ACTION ITEMS (Items a-e) a. FAHR98-66: Receive and file FY 1997/98 End of Year Operational Report. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. b. FAHR98-67: Approve the revised rates for flow, BOD and suspended solids for Class I and Class II Source Control Permit Users. Committee Discussion: During discussion on this item the Committee requested that staff notify Board Members in advance of the names of any businesses in their revenue zones that will have the biggest increases, after staff reviews the entire list of permittees. e Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 September 9, 1998 Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve staffs recommendation. C. FAHR98-68: Broadband Executive Management and Division Managers Classifications and Pay. Committee Discussion: The Committee expressed support for broadbanding and its concept, but more work is needed in the two upper management groups. Some of the Committee members felt that broadbanding is least meaningful for upper management employees, however, it would be more effective and most meaningful at the lower levels of the organization. The lower level employees would benefit because broadbanding would provide an incentive for them to take on more responsibility, work longer hours, become better educated and assume more responsibility, but salaried and senior management employees are already expected to have these attributes. Director Mark Leyes requested a copy of the consultant's report on broadbanding. Mike Peterman advised he will have a compensation and labor relations strategy session next month with copies available for each of the Directors. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to table this item, refer it back to staff and bring it back to a future meeting. d. FAHR98-69: Receive and file Report on District's Public Outreach Efforts for FY 97-98. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. e. FAHR98-70: Cooperative Projects Program: 1. Authorize the General Manager to combine the Water Conservation Cooperative Projects Program with the City Infiltrationtinflow Cooperative Projects Program. 2. Approve increase in the Fiscal Year 1998.99 combined Cooperative Projects Program budget, CORF Budget, Section 8, Page 230, from $300,000 to$5,000,000. 3. Recommend adoption of Resolution OCSD 98-XX supporting in general water reclamation and water use efficiency. Committee Discussion: During discussion on this item, Mr. Hodges advised that Resolution 98-10 already supports the project and, therefore, he removed recommendation No. 3 from his report. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 6 September 9, 1998 The Committee expressed support for this project, however, the general consensus was that a separate committee needs to be set up to prepare guidelines for a project of this size which delineates what is to be accomplished, how the money is to be spent and must include a lot more detail and justifications. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to refer this item back to staff. 15. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATION a. FAHR98-70: YEAR 2000 (Y2K) DATE CHANGE COMPLIANCE PROJECT This item has been rescheduled for the October 21, 1998 FAHR meeting. 16. CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54957, to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Item 16(a)(1) on the published Agenda. The Chair also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the Agenda. He reported that additional Items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) upon a two-third's vote of the Committee. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. It was moved, seconded and duly carried that Item 16(a)(2) be added to the Agenda to discuss a potential matter of litigation re Claim of Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership. The Committee convened In closed session at 7:30 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957 and 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No reportable action was taken re Agenda Items 16 (a)(1) and (2). At 7:50 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (17) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Ryal Wheeler addressed the Committee once again to assure staff and the Committee that his purpose for attending the meeting was to ask the Committee to take another look at broadbanding. He was not at the meeting as a member of the SPMT Committee,just as an individual providing information. The information he provided came from Human Resources originally. I Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 7 September 9, 1998 (18) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Agendize a report that discusses contracting the professional services of an agency to review the Assessor's Tax Rolls for parcels that should be paying user fees that may have been missed, and/or the advantages of conducting the review in-house. (19) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for October 21, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. (20) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 7:51 p.m. Submitted by: �� p Q-,, " "_ e ora Crane FAHR Committee Secretary IMtlonWaMll*polaWA3fObOnoInAHR HRMSeptiMM DCm FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Dace 012319e. 09/09/99 09/13/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 13 (a) /7 L Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 1998 (FAHR9M2) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 1998. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the District's Investment Policy. The District's portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) \nEmW W 1Yvp.MASn\21 Ocnro4'AHMFAHRBBISapEFAHR06e1Arc RM , 1M797 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION r Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of August 1998 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the District's funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts August31, 1998 Yield l%) State of Calif. LAIF $7,153.682 5.7 Union Bank Checking Account 353,094 4.9 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 171,000 5.1 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 18,115,759 5.5 PIMCO-Lang-tens Portfolio 292,623,815 4.5 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 6,413 5.6 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,636.227 6.2 Petty Cash 4,400 Deferred Compensation 14,373,265 (19.8)-10.1 TOTAL $365.437,655 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Reports GGS:SK:lc bAdonWaM1lM dt NnQIPve WAHRTAHRBT ITAHR� dx Roved ,a,7e7 Page 2 IIII II IIII IIII lii. IMEMEMEN MEN -.-.'.-.-. •.❖.1.8 !.❖.❖. �.❖.❖. :.... ..... ..... ,.... :.... ..... ..... ,.... ,.... ..... ..... �:W%4 ❖: ❖ :e ❖:❖, ❖:❖: ❖:❖: :.;.;.;V 1118111 .tXX ;....,.... ,.... ...... . . . . .. ..I - ............. :.............. ,.... ;;;;; :,.,.,.,., .,.,.,.,., ,.•.•.•.4 :•iiiO� ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ,.... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... M Debt Service Reserves „ LAIF *Date Compensation 13 Bank Aocts N Petty Cash N Dist 11 GO Bond Fund MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 August 1998) Liquid Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: Mp�� $18113,633 Mellon $18:115,759 Historical Cost: PIMCO $18,114,149 Mellon $18,114,229 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.21 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1% Change: $38,365 (0.21%) 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 82% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return(°/u): 1 Month: 0.50 3 Months: 1.44 12 Months: 5.67 Year-to-Date: 3.74 Index Total Rate of Return(%): 1 Month: 0.43 MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY /NVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 August 1998) Long Term Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current MarketValue Estimate: gg gg 7766 Mello $292,623;815 Historical Cost: PIMCO $289,281,877 Mellon $289,571,775 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.53 Of Index: 2.34 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,523,822 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 'AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 00/0 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (°/n) 1 Month: 1.55 3 Months: 2.60 12 Months: 8.67 Year-to-Date: 5.50 Index Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 1.45 OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE- USD 31-AUG-1998 HB1300 1 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL WIN/LASS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,560,373.66 2,560,373.66 14.01% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3,357,691.28 3,357,691.28 18.38% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 3,156,158.22 3,156,158.22 17.27% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 2,667,368.09 2,667,368.09 14.601 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 2,872,544.25 2,872,544.25 25.72% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 174,827.37 174,827.37 0.96% 0.00 9,562.10 5.47 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,788,962.87 14,788,962.87 80.951 0.00 9,562.10 0.06 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,325,265.63 3,326,796.00 18.21% 1,530.37 210,375.00 6.32 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,325,265.63 3,326,796.00 18.21% 1,530,37 210,375.00 6.32 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 154,434.25 154,434.25 0.85% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 154,434.25 154,434.25 0.95% 0.00 0.00 0.00 wee===----- ---em--aa------'-` ---»--- ------ ----- --------- ------- NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 18,268,662.75 18,270,193.12 100.00% 1,530.37 219,937.10 1.20 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-AUG-1998 HB1100 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH E CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 510,841.67 510,841.67 0.17% 0.00 0.00 0.00 RECEIVABLES 9,466,185.85 9,466,185.85 3.19% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -89,727,337.96 -89,727,337.96 -30.21% 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 545,756.51 545,756.51 0.18% 0.00 29,849.89 5.47 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS -79,204,553.93 -79,204,553.93 -26.671 0.00 29,849.69 -0.04 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 202,338,726.51 204,624,394.06 68.891 2,285,667.55 13,050,898.34 6.36 U.S. AGENCIES 34,739,404.12 35,753,015.00 12.04% 1,013,530.99 2,160,350.00 6.04 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 91085,996.49 9,063,999.54 3.051 -21,996.95 610,550.52 6.82 FHLMC POOLS 21,936,816.40 21,940,254.00 7.39% 3,437.60 1,476,780.96 6.73 FHLMC MULTICLASS 7,767,183.27 7,857,589.15 2.65% 90,405.88 468,917.20 6.22 FNMA POOLS 4,453,186.90 4,446,300.59 1.50% -6,886.32 271,748.65 6.11 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGA 498,901.90 500,601.03 0.17% 1,699.13 30,948.52 6.18 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 336,091.22 337,449.95 0.11% 1,358.73 20,837.66 6.18 OTHER GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 5,000,000.00 4,997,800.00 1.681 -2,200.00 286,500.00 5.73 BANKING c FINANCE 65,218,917.11 65,297,530.48 21.98% 78,613.37 3,933,007.61 6.02 INDUSTRIAL 9,903,780.00 9,376,020.00 3.16% -527,760.00 832,500.00 8.88 UTILITY - TELEPHONE 7,497,255.00 7,633,425.00 2.57% 136,170.00 450,000.00 5.90 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 368,776,328.92 371,828,368.79 125.18% 3,052,039.97 23,621,039.46 6.35 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,405,128.15 4,405,128.15 1.491 0.00 0.00 0.00 _____________ ------- ___________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,405,128.15 4,405,128.15 1.481 0.00 0.00 0.00 .................. =ae=====__.__..... ......__ . __............. ...------------. ....... NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 293,976,903.14 297,028,943.01 100.004 3,052,039.87 23,650,889.35 7.96 Page 1 'LDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE x 1 :CSF07511102 1998/08/31 RUN DATE 09/04/98 WANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 10.48.02 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ I ME SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE I TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ---------- CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 174,827.37 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT .000 5.469 AAA 100.000 174,827.37 1.18 996085247 174,027.37 .97 2,900,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC 5.462 .000 P-1 99.053 2,872,544.25 19.42 313313L63 MAT 10/23/1998 2,872,544.25 I5.86 800,000.00 FED HOME LN NTG CORP DISC 5.476 .000 P-1 98.976 791,809.70 5.35 313397E98 HAT 09/08/1998 791,809.78 4.37 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN 6K CONS DISC 5.485 .000 P-1 98.811 2,372,454.67 16.03 3133SM70 MAT 10/16/1998 2,371,454.67 13.09 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MTC ASSN DISC 5.495 .000 P-1 98.630 3,156,158.22 21.34 313509"1 MAT 11/06/1998 31156,158.22 17.42 800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.571 .000 P-1 98.551 788,410.00 5.33 63743DA6 09/28/1998 7" 410.00 4.35 900,000.00 GMAC DISC 5.608 .000 P-1 98.075 882,675.00 5.96 37042ELJ8 11/18/1998 882,675.00 4.87 300,004.00 FEDERAL NONE LH RK COILS DISC 6.138 .DOD P-1 98.638 295,913.42 2.00 313MSL20 MAT 10/19/1990 295,913.42 1.63 2,600,000.00 FED HOME IN MG CORP DISC NTS 6.217 .000 P-1 98.686 21565x801.50 17.34 313397F71 MAT 09/14/1998 21565,881.50 14.16 900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 14.952 .000 P-1 98.810 889,288.66 6.02 36959JJ95 09/09/1998 889,288.66 4.91 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.526 .114 1417881962.87 200.00 14,788,962.87 81.63 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,300,000.80 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.585 6.324 AAA 300.812 3,325,265.63 100.00 912S27X72 06.375% 05/15/1999 DO 05/15/96 3,326,796.00 18.36 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 MSF07SIX202 1998/08/31 RUN DATE : 09/04/98 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE : IQ.".02 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.585 6.324 3:325:265.63 100.01 3,326,796.00 18.36 ________ _______ - ----------------- --------- TOTAL 5.529 .351 18,114,228.50 200.00 18:115,758.87 200.00 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE t 3 OCSF07522202 1998/08/31 RUN DATE 09/04/96 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 10.48.02 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ ---------- CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 545,756.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MMT .000 5.469 AM 100.000 545,756.51 100.00 996085247 545,756.51 .15 ________ _______ ----------------- -___-___- TOTAL CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 5.469 545,756.51 100.00 545,756.51 .15 FINED INCOME SECURITIES 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR MY CORP GLOBAL MT .000 5.790 A2 100.D95 1,992,800.00 .53 066365DN4 FLTG RT 05/11/2003 00 05/11/98 2,001,900.00 .54 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN .000 5.804 A2 100.046 3,498,635.00 .94 171200ESD FLTG RT O8/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 3,501,610.00 .94 481,490.50 FNMA POOL /0065581 .000 6.069 AAA 100.563 404,951.21 .13 31362MM7 6.3917. 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 464,201.29 .13 2,000,000.00 FORD MR CR CO TERM ENHANCED .000 5.792 Al 99.931 1,996,613.60 .53 343397SM FLTG RT 08/21/2006 DO 08/27/98 1,990,613.60 .54 4,000,000.00 FORD MR CR MTH TRANCHE KTR 96 .000 5.484 Al 99.929 3,970,480.00 1.07 34M02DZ1 FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 3,997,160.00 1.07 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTH TR 0 00177 .000 5.346 Al 99.890 6,999,748.00 1.90 345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 UD 03/30/94 7,092,190.00 1.90 .00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTH TR00324 .000 .000 A2 .DOD .00 .00 37042RFKB 8.375% OUO3/1999 DO 0/03/95 - .00 .00 3,950,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS .000 5.910 A2 97.929 3,918,768.50 1.04 3704250V5 FLTG RT 08/18/2003 00 08/17/98 3,866,195.50 1.04 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OCSF07522202 1998/08/31 RUN DATE 99/04/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATING RUN TIME 10.48.02 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ Z TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----_-_--- 5,000,ODO.00 HELLER FINL INC SR HT .000 6.178 A3 100.156 2,999,310.00 .80 42332BAZ6 FLTG RT 04/27/1999 DO 04/27/% 5,004,680.00 .81 4,000,000.00 HELLER FINL MTN .000 5.906 A3 100.031 4,000,000.00 1.07 42333MA3 FLTG RT 06/01/2000 DO 04/07/98 4,001,240.00 1.07 4,D00,00D.00 HOUSEHOLD FIN CO MTN .000 6.012 A2 98.921 4,000,000.D0 1.06 441aIKZAS FLTG AT 06/24/2003 DO 06/24/98 3,956,840.00 1.06 7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN HITTER SR NOTES .000 5.677 Al 100.140 7,003,710.00 1.88 61745ELT6 FLTG RT 02/23/2000 DO OV23/98 7,009,800.00 1.00 5,000,000.00 STUDENT LN MKTG ASSN 98-2 Al .000 5.733 AAA 99.956 51000,000.00 1.34 7602GBAB FLTG AT 04/25/2007 DO 06/18/98 4,997,800.00 1.34 10,287,700.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INOEK NT 3.731 3.485 AAA 96.844 10,008,510.47 2.67 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 9,963,020.19 2.68 9,670,716.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX N7 3.760 3.646 AAA 99.437 9,614,035.25 2.58 9128273AB 3.6252 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 9,616,269.87 2.56 43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.349 6.762 AAA 101.672 43,904,468.00 11.83 912827R20 06.8752 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 44,0231976.00 11.82 21,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.569 6.156 AAA 103.891 22,010,625.00 6.00 912827Z54 06.3757 09/30/2001 DO 09/30/96 22,336,565.00 6.00 16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.503 6.623 AAA 113.250 17,773,737.75 4.87 912827586 07.500% OVIS12005 DO 02/15/95 18,120,000.00 4.87 5,200,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.617 9.074 AAA 130.875 6,698,250.00 1.83 912810DG0 11.875% 11/15/2003 DO 10/05/83 6,805,500.00 1.03 16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.668 5.662 AAA 101.562 16,030,100.89 4.37 912927V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 16,249,920.00 4.36 27,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.781 6.997 AAA 107.197 29,048,755.60 7.89 912827U25 07.500Y. 11/15/2001 GO 11/15/91 29,369,230.00 7.89 25,000,OOO.DO U S TREASURY NOTES 5.783 6.195 AAA 104.922 25,746,998.49 7.05 9128272MI 06.5007. 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 26,230,500.00 7.04 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.297 AAA 105.203 3.615,203.13 .99 9120272S0 06.6252 04/30/2002 00 04/30/97 3,602,105.00 .99 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF07522202 1998/00/31 RUN DATE 09/04/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING . RUN TIME 10.48.02 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOWL YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ -_-------- 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.811 6.020 AAA 103.812 5,086,402.25 1.39 9126272LS 06.250I 02/26/2002 OD OU28/97 5,190,600.00 1.39 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.814 5.993 AM 104.297 2,541,015.62 .70 9128273G5 06.2507. 08/31/2002 00 09/02/97 2,607,425.00 .70 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC GOLD SF 5.839 6.082 AM 98.656 4,645,351.56 1.26 02R060696 6.000% 09/15/2028 4,686,160.00 1.26 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL KTG ASSN MTH 5.871 5.841 AM 100.672 5,060,781.25 1.35 31364FFM8 5.8807. 11/03/1999 GO 11/03/97 5,033,600.00 1.35 6,000,000.00 HATIONSBANK CHARLOTTE N C HTN 5.882 5.644 M2 100.109 5,996,400.00 1.61 63S&ME6 5.850% 04/07/2000 OD 04/07/98 61006,540.00 1.61 1,309,360.35 FHLMC MULTICL MG P/C 1574 E 5.912 5.874 100.437 1,307,519.06 .35 3133T0MS 5.9007. 06/15/2017 1,315,082.25 .35 2,434,515.36 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 5.957 5.889 AAA 100.192 2,429,475.16 .65 161614AE2 5.9002 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 2,439,189.63 .66 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 5.995 6.254 M3 101.942 2,526,725.00 .66 590183KP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 2,SM,550.00 .68 7,500,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATI0NS 6.010 5.895 AM 102.779 7,497,255.00 2.05 079867AK5 6.00OI 06/15/2002 DO 06/15/98 7,633,425.00 2.05 1,250,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP CORP HIS 6.032 6.893 A2 103.372 1,263,862.50 .34 3704UQF0 7.1257. 05/01/2001 OD 05/01/97 1,292,150.00 .35 I,000,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP MTN 6.046 6.541 A2 102.437 11018,520.00 .27 37042WGKI 6.700% 04/30/2001 DO 04/25/96 1,024,370.00 .28 822,552.34 FNMA POOL 10313783 6.108 6.123 AM 100.563 828,464.43 .22 31374GRC3 6.1577. OS/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 827,183.31 .22 219,910.36 FMMA POOL 40313769 6.118 6.117 AM 100.563 221,490.96 .05 313746QWO 6.151% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 221,146.46 .06 935,499.32 FNMA POOL 80313371 6.142 6.113 AAA 100.563 942,223.22 .25 31374GC60 6.147% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 "0'766.15 .25 905,546.44 FMHA POOL 80313600 6.144 6.109 AM 300.563 912,057.06 .24 31374GKM8 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 9101646.68 .24 YLDAI6AL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 6 OMF07522202 1998/08/31 RUN DATE 09/04/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.48.02 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT OUALETV MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOO( YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------. 416,673.49 FNMA POOL /0238575 6.149 6.132 AM 100.563 419,668.34 .11 31370Q6LO 6.167% 03/01/2033 DO 09/02/93 419,019.36 .11 639,733.60 F18U POOL 60339016 6.158 6.119 AM 100.563 644,331.68 .17 31375MSD6 6.153% 11/01/2035 OD 03/01/96 643,335.30 .17 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.162 8.801 AM 126.406 6,233,593.75 1.69 912810DES 11.1252 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 6,326,300.00 2.70 336,091.23 FIFTH THIRD BK AMD TA 96A CLA 6.200 6.175 AM 100.404 336,091.22 .09 31677EM4 6.200% 09/01/2001 00 03/15/96 337,449.95 .09 499,976.06 CONTIMORTGASE HOME E4 96-4 A3 6.213 6.182 AM 200.125 498,901.90 .13 21075NDK8 6.190Y. 10/15/2011 OD 11/23/96 500,601.03 .13 2,000,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO MUD 6.225 6.169 A2 1E0.510 1,997,730.00 .54 073902 6 6.200% 03/30/2003 OD 03/30/98 2,010,200.00 .m 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAR MTG ASSM MTM 6.291 6.063 AM 102.750 4,488,705.00 2.24 31364CKV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 4,623,750.00 1.24 4,453,904.75 FNLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.292 AM 100.516 4,458,776.21 1.20 3133TCE95 6.324Y. 08/15/2032 4,476,SB6.90 1.20 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS MLDGS MTH 000196 6.364 6.527 BM1 101.890 5,039,450.00 2.37 52517PJ 6.650% 11/08/2000 DO 11/OB/96 5,094,500.00 1.37 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR IRS 6.425 6.596 A2 102.335 1,317,619.35 .35 07390UWB 6.750Y. 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 1,335,471.75 .36 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF TEL A6 6.496 6.294 AM 103.281 2,000,888.00 .55 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2016 2,065,620.00 .55 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG AS" MTH 6.577 6.387 AM 103.754 8.012,576.00 2.23 313"MO9 6.625Y. 04/18/2001 DO 04/18/96 8,296,720.00 2.23 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 6.593 8.879 A2 104.178 9,903,780.00 2.52 718154032 9.2502 OVIS12000 9,376,020.00 2.52 17,025,442.31 FHLMC GROUP ICS-0476 6.629 6.907 AAA 301.343 17,291,464.84 4.64 3128DDQSS 7.D002 0V0112003 OD OV01198 17,254,B%.00 4.63 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN MTN 6.636 5.649 AM 99.844 9,593,750.00 2.68 313648NF3 5.640/ OV2012001 00 OU20/96 9,984,400.00 2.68 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 7 OCSF07522202 1998/O6/31 RIM DATE : 09/04/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RIM TIME : 10.48.02 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ _--_----__ 3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 6.660 8.308 M 103.811 3,227,070.00 .83 37042RKQ4 8.625% 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 3,114,330.00 .84 5,OOO,DOU.00 FEDERAL HOME LN "TO CORP DEES 6.713 5.988 AM 100.031 41852,562.50 1.34 31MAOVN8 5.990% 03/06/2001 OD 03/D6/96 5,001,550.00 1.34 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLKC GOLD SF 6.827 6.840 AAA 102.218 2,792,109.37 .75 02R070695 7.000% 09/15/2028 2,818,995.00 .75 4,387,083.41 GNMA II POOL 0080088M 6.828 6.750 AM 101.859 4,483,U50.87 1.20 36225CC20 6.875X 06/20/2027 00 06/01/97 4,468,639.29 1.20 1,615,299.80 GNMA II POOL 600E8684 6.865 6.898 AAA 101.484 1,642,305.59 .44 36202KUR6 7.0007. 08/20/2025 OD 08/01/95 1,639,270.65 .44 2,912,393.50 GNMA II POOL /0080023 6.869 6.897 AM 101.508 2,960,630.03 .79 36225CAZ9 7.000X 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 2,956,079.40 .79 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 8.062 AM 164.359 4,029,030.31 1.10 912810DJ4 13.2507. 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 4,108,975.00 1.10 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.492 6.180 360,776,328.92 100.00 371,528,368.79 99.81 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL 4.492 6.180 369,322,085.43 100.00 372,374,125.30 100.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORA GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 06-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912B27D25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 25-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827D25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 00000000 CW 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 21/15/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 12-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 91262IR20 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 20-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827R20 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CN 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 20-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827R20 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 20-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827R20 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 20-AUG-2998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827586 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIR FEES 28-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827586 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ CW 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/25/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 07-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128272WI U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 21-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273A8 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 21-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273AB US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 21-AUG-1998 -2,872,544.25 -2,872,544.25 99.053250 3133131,63 MAT 1D/23/1998 21-AUG-1998 2,872,544.25 2,872,544.25 99.053250 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 22-AUG-1998 -2,872,544.25 -2,872,544.25 99.053250 313313L63 MAT 10/23/1998 21-AUG-1998 -2,872,544.25 0.00 99.053250 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 22-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 07-AUG-1998 -3,156,158.22 -3,156,158.22 98.629944 313589N41 MAT 11/06/1998 07-AUG-1998 3,156,158.22 3,156,158.22 98.629944 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 07-AUG-1998 -3,156,158.22 -3,156,158.22 98.629944 313589N41 MAT 12/06/1998 07-AUG-1998 -3,156,158.22 6.00 98.629944 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 07-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 2 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-AUG-1998 -99,555.33 -99,555.33 99.555330 36959JJ95 09/09/1998 11-AUG-1998 99,555.33 99,555.33 99.555330 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 11-AUG-1998 -99,555.33 -99,555.33 99.555330 36959JJ95 09/09/1998 11-AUG-1998 -99,555.33 0.00 . 99.555330 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI) , 11-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 03-AUG-1998 -15.62 -15.62 1.000000 996085247 03-AUG-1998 15.62 15.62 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15.62 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NGMT 03-AUG-1998 -15.62 -15.62 1.000000 996085247 03-AUG-1998 -15.62 0.00 1.000000 PC 03-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 662.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-AUG-1998 -662.94 -662.94 1.000000 996085247 04-AUG-1998 662.94 662.94 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 662.94 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGNT 04-AUG-1998 -662.94 -662.94 1.000000 996085247 04-AUG-1998 -662.94 0.00 1.000000 FC 04-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57,557.82 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 05-AUG-1998 -57,557.82 -57,557.82 1.000000 996085247 05-AUG-1998 57,557.82 57,557.82 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 57,557.82 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NGMT 05-AUG-1998 -57,557.82 -57,557.82 1.000000 996085247 05-AUG-1998 -57,557.82 0.00 1.000000 PC 05-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 3 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 43,841.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-AUG-1998 -43,841.78 -43,041.78 1.000000 996085247 07-AUG-1998 43,841.78 43,841.78 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 43,841.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-AUG-1998 -43,041.78 -43,841.78 1.000000 996085247 07-AUG-1998 -43,841.78 0.00 1.000000 PC 07-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 58,305.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-AUG-1998 -58,305.75 -58,305.75 1.000000 996085247 10-AUG-1998 58,305.75 58,305.75 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 58,305.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 10-AUG-1998 -50,305.75 -58,305.75 1.000000 996085247 10-AUG-1998 -59,305.75 0.00 1.000000 FC 10-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,580.55 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-AUG-1998 -29,580.55 -29,580.55 1.000000 996085247 11-AUG-1998 29,580.55 29,580.55 1.000000 e ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 29,580.55 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-AUG-1998 -29,580.55 -29,580.55 1.000000 996085247 11-AUG-1998 -29,580.55 0.00 1.000000 PC 11-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 30,937.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-AUG-1998 -30,937.51 -30,937.51 1.000000 996085247 13-AUG-1998 30,937.51 30,937.51 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30,937.51 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 13-AUG-1998 -30,937.51 -30,937.51 1.000000 996085247 13-AUG-1998 -30,937.51 0.00 1.000000 PC 13-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 4 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1999 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,865.99 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-AUG-1998 -17,865.89 -17,865.89 1.000000 996085247 14-AUG-1998 17,865.89 17,865.89 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,865.89 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 14-AUG-1998 -17,865.89 -17,865.89 1.000000 996085247 14-AUG-1998 -17,865.89 0.00 1.000000 PC 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,149,177.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-AUG-1998 -2,148,177.76 -2,148,177.76 1.000000 996085247 17-AUG-1998 2,148,177.76 2,148,177.76 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,148,177.76 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 17-AUG-1998 -2,148,177.76 -2,148,177.76 1.000000 996085247 17-AUG-1998 -2,148,177.16 0.00 1.000000 PC 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 237,793.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-AUG-1998 -237,793.BB -237,793.88 1.000000 996085247 18-AUG-1998 237,793.BB 237,793.88 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 237,793.88 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 18-AUG-1998 -237,793.88 -237,793.88 1.000000 996085247 18-AUG-1998 -237,793.88 0.00 1.000000 PC 18-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,723.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-AUG-1998 -19,723.35 -19,723.35 1.000000 996085247 19-AUG-1998 19,723.35 19,723.35 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,723.35 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 19-AUG-1998 -19,723.35 -19,723.35 1.000000 996085247 19-AUG-1998 -19,723.35 0.00 1.000000 Page 5 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC 19-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 895,392.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-AUG-1998 -895,392.00 -895,392.00 1.000000 9960B5247 20-AUG-1998 895,392.00 895,392.00 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 895,392.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 20-AUG-1998 -895,392.00 -895,392.00 1.000000 996085247 20-AUG-1998 -895,392.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 20-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 52,455.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-AUG-1998 -52,455.75 -52,455.75 1.000000 996095247 21-AUG-1998 52,455.75 52,455.75 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 52,455.75 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-AUG-1998 -52,455.75 -52,455.75 1.000000 996085247 21-AUG-1998 -52,455.75 0.00 1.000000 PC 21-AUG-199B 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 212,927.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-AUG-1998 -212,927.78 -212,927.78 1.000000 996085247 25-AUG-1998 212,927.78 212,927.78 1.000000 B ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 212,927.78 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 25-AUG-1990 -212,927.78 -212,927.78 1.000000 996095247 25-AUG-1998 -212,927.78 0.00 1.000000 PC 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 237,793.88 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 17-AUG-1998 -237,793.88 -237,793.88 1.000000 996087094 VAR AT DO O6/26/1997 17-AUG-1998 237,793.88 237,793.88 1.000000 B 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,786.35 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 24-AUG-1998 -100,786.35 -100,786.35 1.000000 Page 6 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996087094 VAR AT DD 06/26/1997 24-AUG-1998 100,786.35 100,786.35 1.000000 B 24-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 11-AUG-1998 -4,645,351.56 -4,645,351.56 97.796875 02RO60696 6.000% 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 4,645,351.56 4,645,351.56 97.796875 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 29-MAY-1998 -5,463,906.25 -5,463,906.25 99.343750 02RO62684 6.500% OB/D1/2028 13-AUG-1998 5,463,906.25 5,463,906.25 99.343750 B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES 6 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 29-MAY-1998 -5,463,906.25 -5,463,906.25 99.343750 02RO62684 6.500% 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1998 -5,463,906.25 0.00 99.343750 FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES 6 13-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PURCHASE FHLMC GOLD 04-AUG-1998 -5,407,960.75 -5,487,968.75 99.781250 02RO62692 6.50% 9/15/2026 14-SEP-1998 5,487,968.75 5,487,960.75 99.781250 B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES 6 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 01-JUL-1998 -2,792,109.37 -2,792,109.37 101.531250 02RO70687 7.0001 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1998 2,792,109.37 2,792,109.37 101.531250 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 01-JUL-1998 -2,792,109.37 -2,792,109.37 101.53125D 02RO70687 7.000% 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1998 -2,792,109.37 0.00 101.531250 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 03-AUG-1998 -2,792,109.37 -2,792,109.37 101.531250 02RO70695 7.0009 09/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 2,792,109.37 2,792,109.37 101.531250 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 26-AUG-1998 -497,925.00 -497,925.00 99.585000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DD 03/30/98 31-AUG-1998 497,925.00 497,925.00 99.585000 B BHF SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 26-AUG-1998 -12,916.67 -12,916.67 99.585000 073902BJG 6.2DD4 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 99.585000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 BEAR STEARNS CO UNSUB 26-AUG-1998 -510,841.67 -510,841.67 99.595000 073902BJ6 6.200% 03/30/2003 DO 03/30/98 31-AUG-1990 -510,841.67 0.00 99.585000 PC BHF SECURITIES, NEW YORK 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO TERM ENHANCED 18-AUG-1998 -1,998,613.60 -1,998,613.60 99.930680 345397SCB FLTG AT 08/27/2006 DD 08/27/98 27-AUG-1990 1,998,613.60 1,998,613.60 99.930680 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO TERM ENHANCED 18-AUG-1998 -1,998,613.60 -1,998,613.60 99.930680 345397SCO FLTG RT 08/27/2006 DO 08/27/98 27-AUG-1998 -1,998,613.60 0.00 99.930680 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB 27-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 31-JUL-1998 -1,307,117.71 -1,307,117.71 102.709000 3704250FO 7.125% 05/01/2001 DD 05/01/97 05-AUG-1998 -1,307,117.71 0.00 102.709000 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 05-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 28-AUG-1998 -3,670,696.00 -3,670,696.00 99.208000 3704250V5 FLTG AT 08/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 02-SEP-1998 3,670,696.00 3,670,696.00 99.208000 B HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 28-AUG-1998 -9,517.22 -9,517.22 99.208000 370425QVS FLTG AT 08/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 02-SEP-1990 0.00 0.00 99.208000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 8 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS RASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 28-AUG-1998 -248,072.50 -248,072.50 99.229000 370425QV5 FLTG RT 08/19/2003 DD 09/17/99 02-SEP-1998 248,072.50 248,072.50 99.229000 B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 250,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP NTS 28-AUG-1998 -643.06 -643.06 99.229000 3704250VS FLTG RT OB/18/2003 DO 08/17/98 02-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 99.229000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 30-JUL-1999 -2,526,725.00 -2,526,725.00 101.069000 59018SXP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DD 10/03/97 04-AUG-1998 2,526,725.00 2,526,725.00 101.069000 B DEUTSCHE MORGAN GRENFELL, MEN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 30-JUL-1998 -54,453.12 -54,453.12 101.069000 59018SXP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 04-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 101.069000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 MERRILL LYNCH NOTES 30-JUL-1998 -2,581,178.12 -2,581,170.12 101.069000 59018SXP4 6.375% 10/01/2001 DO 10/03/97 04-AUG-1998 -2,581,178.12 0.00 101.069000 FC DEUTSCHE MORGAN GRENFELL, NEW 04-AUG-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-JUL-1998 -20,155,043.75 -20,155,043.75 105.783700 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 21-AUG-1998 -20,155,043.75 0.00 105.783700 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 21-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-AUG-1998 -17,179,954.20 -17,179,954.20 106.049100 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 18-SEP-1998 17,179,954.20 17,179,954.20 106.049100 B BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-AUG-1998 -416,005.43 -416,005.43 106.049100 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 18-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 106.049100 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 9 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATS/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-JUL-1998 -52,290,902.44 -52,290,902.44 101.461900 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 -52,290,902.44 0.00 101.461900 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CUR 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-JUL-1998 -2,928,290.54 -2,928,290.54 101.461900 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 -2,928,290.54 0.00 101.461900 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1998 -304,312.50 -304,312.50 101.437500 912827R20 06.875% O8/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 05-AUG-1998 304,312.50 304,312.50 101.437500 B BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1998 -8,855.30 -8,855.30 101.437500 912827R20 06.875% 08/32/1999 DD O8/31/94 05-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 101.437500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1998 -313,167.60 -313,167.00 101.437500 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO O8/31/94 05-AUG-1998 -313,167.80 0.00 101.437500 PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 05-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1998 -43,904,469.00 -43,904,468.00 101.396000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 17-SEP-1998 43,904,469.00 43,904,468.00 101.396000 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1998 -139,798.00 -139,798.00 101.396000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO O9/31/94 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 101.396000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES O8-JUL-1998 -5,498,168.72 -5,498, 168.72 110.815900 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 14-AUG-1998 -5,498,168.72 0.00 110.815900 Page 10 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 09-JUL-1998 -2,064,664.47 -2,064,664.47 110.974300 912B27SB6 07.500% 02/25/2005 DO 02/15/95 14-AUG-1998 -2,064,664.47 0.00 110.974300 FC CHASE SECS INC, NY 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1998 -6,651,210.00 -6,651,210.00 110.853500 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 17-SEP-1999 6,651,210.00 6,651,210.00 110.853500 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1996 -40,353.26 -40,353.26 110.053500 912827586 07.5001 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 110.853500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-AUG-1998 -1,572,755.80 -1,572,755.80 112.339700 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 17-SEP-1998 1,572,755.80 1,572,755.80 112.339700 B BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-AUG-1990 -9,415.76 -9,415.76 112.339700 912827586 07.5001 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 17-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 112.339700 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 09-JUL-1999 2,526,761.00 2,526,761.00 101.070440 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 17-AUG-1990 -2,526,761.00 -2,526,761.00 101.070440 BC GREENWICH CAP MKTS, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,542,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 09-JUL-1998 -2,518,494.85 -2,518,494.85 99.040262 9128273A8 3.6251 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 17-AUG-1998 2,518,494.85 2,518,494.85 99.040262 B GREENWICH CAP MKTS, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,542,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 09-JUL-1998 -8,266.15 -8,266.15 99.040262 Page 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TN100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 17-AUG-199B 0.00 0.00 99.040262 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,542,900.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 09-JUL-1998 -2,526,761.00 -2,526,761.00 99.040262 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 17-AUG-1998 -2,526,761.00 0.00 99.040262 PC CHASE SECS INC, NY 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,444,904.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-AUG-1998 -2,422,924.51 -2,422,924.51 99.101008 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1999 2,422,924.51 2,422,924.51 99.101008 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CUR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,444,904.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-AUG-1998 -16,376.87 -16,376.87 99.101008 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 21-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 99.101008 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 29-MAY-1998 5,463,906.25 5,463,906.25 99.343750 999ACM760 6.500% 08/15/2028 13-AUG-1998 -5,463,906.25 -5,463,906.25 99.343750 BC •FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES 6 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 01-JUL-1998 2,792,309.37 2,792,109.37 101.531250 999ACP441 7.000% 08/15/2028 13-AUG-1998 -2,792,109.37 -2,792,109.37 101.531250 BC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -19,000.00 -190000.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JUL-1998 19,000.00 19,000.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 19,000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -19,000.00 -19,000.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -19,000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 03-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 12 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,800.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -12,800.00 -12,800.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 15-JUL-1998 12,800.00 12,800.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,800.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1998 -12,800.00 -12,800.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -12,800.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 04-AUG-199B 1,281,926.38 1,281,926.38 98.609721 63743DKV2 10/29/1998 04-AUG-1998 -1,281,926.39 -1,281,926.39 98.609721 S CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- -0.01 -0.01 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 04-AUG-1998 930.95 930.95 98.609721 63743DKV2 10/29/1998 04-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 98.609721 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 04-AUG-1998 1,282,057.33 1,282,857.33 98.609721 63743DKV2 10/29/1998 04-AUG-1998 1,282,057.33 0.00 98.609721 PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 04-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 05-AUG-1998 1,676,365.27 1,676,365.27 28.609721 63743DKV2 10/29/1998 05-AUG-1998 -1,676,365.28 -1,676,365.28 98.609722 S CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- -0.01 -0.01 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 05-AUG-1998 1,478.06 1,478.06 98.609721 63743DKV2 10/29/1998 05-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 98.609721 i5 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,700,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 05-AUG-1998 1,677,843.33 1,677,843.33 90.609721 Page 13 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 63743DKV2 10/29/1998 05-AUG-1998 1,677,843.33 0.00 98.609721 FC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 05-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 14-AUG-1998 690,268.05 690,268.05 98.609721 63743DKV2 10/29/1998 14-AUG-1998 -690,268.05 -690,268.05 98.609721 S CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 14-AUG-1998 1,574.62 1,574.62 98.609721 63743DKV2 10/29/1998 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 98.609721 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 14-AUG-1998 691,942.67 691,842.67 98.609721 63743DKV2 10/29/1998 14-AUG-1998 691,842.67 0.00 98.609721 PC CHASE SECURITIES, NEW YORK 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,294,378.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-AUG-1998 1,294,378.06 1,294,378.06 1.000000 996085247 04-AUG-199B -1,294,378.06 -1,294,378.06 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,294,378.06 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-AUG-1998 1,294,378.06 1,294,378.06 1.000000 996085247 04-AUG-1998 1,294,378.06 0.00 1.000000 FC 04-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-AUG-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 06-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 s ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 06-AUG-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 06-AUG-1998 3.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 06-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 14 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST . CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-AUG-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 07-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 07-AUG-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996095247 07-AUG-1998 3.00 0.00 1.000000 PC 07-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -99,555.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-AUG-1998 99,555.33 99,555.33 1.000000 996085247 11-AUG-1998 -99,555.33 -99,555.33 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -99,555.33 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 11-AUG-1998 99,555.33 99,555.33 1.000000 996085247 11-AUG-1998 99,555.33 0.00 1.000000 PC 11-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-AUG-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 12-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 12-AUG-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 12-AUG-1998 3.G0 0.00 1.000000 FC 12-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,634,177,47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-AUG-1998 2,634,177.47 2,634,177.47 1.000000 996085247 21-AUG-1998 -2,634,177.47 -2,634,177.47 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,634,177.47 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 21-AUG-1998 2,634,177.47 2,634,177.47 1.000000 996085247 21-AUG-1998 2,634,177.47 0.00 1.000000 FC 21-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ EASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -421,502.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-AUG-1998 421,502.19 421,502.19 1.000000 996085247 27-AUG-1998 -421,502.19 -421,502.19 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -421,502.19 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 27-AUG-1998 421,502.19 421,502.19 1.000000 996085247 27-AUG-1998 421,502.19 0.00 1.000000 FC 27-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH HGMT 28-AUG-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 28-AUG-1998 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 28-AUG-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 996085247 28-AUG-1998 3.00 0.00 1.000000 FC 28-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -285,747.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-AUG-1998 285,747.98 285,747.98 1.000000 996085247 31-AUG-1998 -285,747.98 -285,747.98 1.000000 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -285,747.98 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 31-AUG-1998 285,747.98 285,747.98 1.000000 996085247 31-AUG-1998 285,747.98 0.00 1.000000 PC 32-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -237,793.88 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 18-AUG-1998 237,793.88 237,793.88 1.000000 996087094 VAR AT DD 06/26/1997 18-AUG-1998 -237,793.88 -237,793.88 1.000000 S 18-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -100,786.35 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 25-AUG-1998 100,786.35 100,786.35 1.000000 996087094 VAR AT DO 06/26/1997 25-AUG-1998 -100,786.35 -100,786.35 1.000000 S 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 16 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 04-AUG-1998 5,492,480.47 5,492,480.47 99.863281 02R062684 6.500% 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1998 -5,463,906.25 -5,463,906.25 99.863281 S FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES L ----------- 28,574.22 28,574.22 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,500,000.00 COIMtIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 04-AUG-1998 5,492,490.47 5,492,480.47 99.863281 02R062684 6.500E 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1998 5,492,490.47 0.00 99.863281 PC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES i 13-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PURCHASE FHLMC GOLD 11-AUG-1998 5,503,437.50 5,503,437.50 100.062500 02R062692 6.50% 9/15/2028 14-SEP-1998 -5,487,968.75 -5,487,968.75 100.062500 S MORGAN STANLEY i CO INC, NY ----------- 15,468.75 15,468.75 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 03-AUG-1998 2,794,472.66 2,794,472.66 101.617187 02R070687 7.000% 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1998 -2,792,109.37 -2,792,109.37 101.617187 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 2,363.29 2,363.29 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 03-AUG-1998 2,794,472.66 2,794,472.66 101.617187 02R070687 7.000% 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1998 2,794,472.66 0.00 101.617187 PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 03-AUG-1998 -2,794,472.66 -2,794,472.66 101.617187 02R070687 7.000% 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1998 2,792,109.37 2,792,109.37 101.617187 SC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- -2,363.29 -2,363.29 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 03-AUG-1998 -2,794,472.66 -2,794,472.66 101.617187 02R070687 7.000% 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1998 -2,794,472.66 0.00 101.617197 FCC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD SF 03-AUG-1998 2,794,472.65 2,794,472.65 101.617197 02R070687 7.000% 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1998 -2,792,109.37 -2,792,109.37 101.617197 Page 17 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 2,363.20 2,363.28 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FOR FHLMC GOLD SF 03-AUG-1998 2,794,472.65 2,794,472.65 101.617187 02R070687 7.0001 08/01/2028 13-AUG-1999 2,794,472.65 0.00 101.617197 PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 GENERAL MIRE ACCEP MTN TR00324 28-AUG-1990 3,739,812.00 3,739,812.00 101.076000 37042RPM8 8.375% 02/03/1999 DO 0/03/95 02-SEP-1998 -3,911,640.00 -3,911,640.00 101.076000 S HSBC SECURITIES INC, NEW YORK ----------- -171,828.00 -171,828.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN TR00324 28-AUG-1998 129,975.35 129,975.35 101.076000 37042RPMB 8.375% 02/03/1999 DO 0/03/95 02-SEP-1998 0.00 0.00 101.076000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-AUG-1998 17,197,312.50 17,197,312.50 106.156250 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 21-AUG-1998 -17,167,373.45 -17,167,373.45 106.156250 S RANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 29,939.05 29,939.05 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-AUG-1999 323,559.78 323,559.70 106.156250 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 21-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 106.156250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-AUG-1998 17,520,872.28 17,520,872.28 106.156250 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 12/15/91 21-AUG-1998 17,520,872.28 0.00 106.156250 PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 21-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1999 -9,636,191.41 -9,636,191.41 101.433593 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 30-JUL-1998 9,638,096.01 9,638,096.01 101.433593 SC MORGAN STANLEY c CO INC, NY ----------- 1,904.60 1,904.60 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1996 -269,769.02 -269,769.02 101.433593 Page 18 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 912827R20 06.8759 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 30-JUL-1998 0.00 0.00 101.433593 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 -9,905,960.43 -9,905,960.43 101.433593 912827R20 06.8751 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 30-JUL-1998 -9,905,960.43 0.00 101.433593 FCC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 30-JUL-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 9,325,129.20 9,325,129.20 101.360100 912627R20 06.8758 09/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 -9,333,735.09 -9,333,735.09 101.360100 S BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- -8,605.89 -8,605.89 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 287,031.25 287,031.25 101.360100 912827R20 06.B756 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 101.360100 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 -9,325,129.20 -9,325,129.20 101.360100 912827R20 06.8751 09/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 9,333,735.09 9,333,735.09 101.360100 SC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO OOMIN ----------- 8,605.89 8,605.89 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 -287,031.25 -287,031.25 101.360100 912827R20 06.8758 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 101.360100 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 9,636,191.41 9,636,191.41 101.433593 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO O8/31/94 30-JUL-1998 -9,638,096.01 -9,638,096.01 101.433593 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -1,904.60 -1,904.60 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 269,769.02 269,769.02 101.433593 912827R20 06.B758 08/31/1999 DO O8/31/94 30-JUL-1998 0.00 0.00 101.433593 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 19 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -9,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 9,905,960.43 9,905,960.43 101.433593 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD O8/31/94 30-JUL-1998 9,905,960.43 0.00 101.433593 PC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 04-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 9,325,129.20 9,325,129.20 101.360100 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 -9,333,735.09 -9,333,735.09 101.360100 S BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- -0,605.89 -8,605.89 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 287,031.25 287,031.25 101.360100 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 101.360100 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 29-JUL-1998 9,612,160.45 9,612,160.45 101.360100 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD O8/31/94 14-AUG-1998 9,612,160.45 0.00 101.360100 FC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1998 304,228.50 304,228.50 101.409500 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 -304,360.50 -304,360.50 101.409500 S BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- -132.00 -132.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1998 9,359.71 9,359.71 101.409500 912827R20 06.8751 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 101.409500 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1998 313,588.21 313,588.21 101.409500 912B27R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 313,588.21 0.00 101.409500 PC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1998 43,949,500.00 43,949,500.00 101.500000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 -43,929,379.10 -43,929,379.10 101.500000 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CUR ----------- 20,120.90 20,120.90 1.000000000 0.00 Page 20 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-2998 1,350,918.82 1,350,918.82 101.500000 912827R20 06.875t 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 101.500000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -43,300,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1998 45,300,418.82 45,300,418.82 101.500000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 14-AUG-1998 45,300,418.82 0.00 101.500000 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 14-AUG-1998 0.00 D.DD 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1998 6,659,125.00 6,658,125.00 110.968750 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 14-AUG-1998 -6,661,974.46 -6,661,974.46 110.968750 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- -3,849.46 -3,849.46 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1998 223,756.91 223,756.91 110.968750 912827586 07.500t 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 14-AUG-2998 0.00 0.00 110.968750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-AUG-1998 6,881,881.91 6,881,881.91 110.968750 912827586 07.500t 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 14-AUG-1998 61881,881.91 0.00 110.968750 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 14-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-AUG-1998 1,573,687.50 1,573,687.50 112.406250 912827586 07.500t 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 27-AUG-1998 -1,553,518.82 -1,553,518.82 112.406250 S BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK ----------- 20,168.69 20,168.68 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-AUG-1998 3,423.91 3,423.91 112.406250 912827586 07.500t 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 27-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 112.406250 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-AUG-1998 1,577,111.41 1,577,111.41 112.406250 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 27-AUG-1998 1,577,111.41 0.00 112.406250 FC BARCLAYS BANK, NEW YORK 27-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 21 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 RASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ RASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,441,184.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-AUG-1998 2,418,297.90 2,418,297.90 99.062500 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO '07/15/97 17-AUG-1998 -2,426,862.91 -2,426,862.91 99.062500 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- -8,565.01 -8,565.01 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,441,184.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-AUG-1998 7,935.51 7,935.51 99.062500 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 99.062500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO -2,441,184.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 14-AUG-1998 2,426,233.41 2,426,233.41 99.062500 9128273AO 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 17-AUG-1998 2,426,233.41 0.00 99.062500 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -224,719.30 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-AUG-1999 224,719.30 224,719.30 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-AUG-1998 -224,254.06 -224,254.06 100.000000 PD ----------- 465.24 465.24 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -224,719.30 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-AUG-1998 224,719.30 224,719.30 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-AUG-1998 224,719.30 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -383,631.92 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EO 96-4 A3 01-AUG-1998 383,631.92 383,631.92 100.000000 21075NDKS 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-AUG-1998 -382,807.71 -382,807.71 100.000000 PD ----------- 824.21 824.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 383,631.92 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME SO 96-4 A3 01-AUG-1998 -303,631.92 -383,631.92 100.000000 22075NDKO 6.190% 10/15/2011 DD 11/23/96 01-AUG-1998 382,807.71 382,807.71 100.000000 PDC ----------- -824.21 -824.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -383,631.96 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME SO 96-4 A3 01-AUG-1998 383,631.96 383,631.96 100.000000 Page 22 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IRV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE ERATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 21075NDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-AUG-1998 -382,807.75 -382,807.75 100.000000 PD ----------- 824.21 824.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -383,631.96 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-AUG-1998 393,631.96 383,631.96 100.000000 21075NDKB 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-AUG-1998 383,631.96 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -342,979.07 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-AUG-1998 342,979.07 342,979.07 100.000000 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-AUG-1998 -348,338.12 -348,338.12 100.000000 PD ----------- -5,359.05 -5,359.05 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -342,979.07 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-AUG-1998 342,979.07 342,979.07 100.000000 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-AUG-1998 342,979.07 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 73,157.50 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JUL-1998 -73,157.50 -73,157.50 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JUL-1998 73,237.52 73,237.52 100.000000 PDC ----------- 80.02 80.02 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -73,157.67 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JUL-1998 73,157.67 73,157.67 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 O1-JUL-1998 -73,237.69 -73,237.69 100.000000 PD ----------- -80.02 -80.02 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 73,157.67 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JUL-1998 -73,157.67 -73,157.67 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JUL-1998 73,237.69 73,237.69 100.000000 PDC ----------- 80.02 80.02 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -73,157.68 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JUL-1998 73,157.68 73,157.68 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JUL-1998 -73,237.70 -73,237.70 100.000000 PD ----------- -80.02 -80.02 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 23 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1990 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -73,157.68 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-JUL-1998 73,157.68 73,157.68 100.000000 31337CE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JUL-1998 73,157.68 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -92,961.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A O1-AUG-1998 92,961.00 92,961.00 100.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-AUG-1998 -93,062.68 -93,062.68 100.000000 PD ----------- -101.68 -101.68 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,626.20 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-AUG-1998 47,626.20 47,626.20 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-AUG-1998 -47,559.23 -47,559.23 100.000000 PD ----------- 66.97 66.97 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,626.20 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E O1-AUG-1999 47,626.20 47,626.20 100.000000 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-AUG-1998 47,626.20 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -8,301.64 FNMA POOL 10065591 01-AUG-1998 8,301.64 8,301.64 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 09/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-AUG-1998 -8,361.31 -8,361.31 100.000000 PD ----------- -59.67 -59.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,301.64 FNHA POOL #0065581 01-AUG-1998 -8,301.64 -8,301.64 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-AUG-1998 8,361.31 8,361.31 100.000000 PDC ----------- 59.67 59.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,301.65 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-AUG-1998 8,301.65 6,301.65 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.3911 08/02/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-AUG-1998 -8,361.32 -6,361.32 100.000000 PD ----------- -59.67 -59.67 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,301.65 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-AUG-1999 8,301.65 8,301.65 100.000000 31362H2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DD 09/01/88 01-AUG-1998 8,301.65 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-AUG-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 24 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,644.28 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-AUG-1998 7,644.28 7,644.28 100.000000 3137006LS 6.218% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-AUG-1998 -7,699.22 -7,699.22 100.000000 PD ----------- -54.94 -54.94 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,644.28 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-AUG-2996 7,644.28 7,644.28 100.000000 3137006L8 6.218E 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-AUG-1998 7,644.28 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,902.95 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-AUG-1998 14,902.95 14,902.95 100.000000 31374GCGO 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -15,010.07 -15,010.07 100.000000 PD ----------- -107.12 -107.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPEE-PIMCO 14,902.95 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-AUG-1998 -14,902.95 -14,902.95 100.000000 31374GCGO 6.1941 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-AUG-1998 15,010.07 15,010.07 100.000000 PDC ----------- 107.12 107.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,902.9E FNMA POOL #0313371 01-AUG-1998 14,902.98 14,902.98 100.000000 31374GCGO 6.1948 08/01/2029 DD 01/01/97 01-AUG-199B -15,010.10 -150010.10 100.000000 PD ----------- -107.12 -107.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -14,902.98 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-AUG-1998 14,902.98 14,902.98 100.000000 31374GCGO 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-AUG-1998 14,902.98 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,096.62 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-AUG-1998 15,096.62 15,096.62 100.000000 31374GXMB 6.1B26 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -15,205.13 -15,205.13 100.000000 PD ----------- -108.51 -108.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,096.62 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-AUG-1999 -15,096.62 -15,096.62 100.000000 31374GKMO 6.182% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-AUG-1998 15,205.13 15,205.13 100.000000 PDC ----------- 108.51 108.51 1.000000000 0.00 Page 25 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,096.62 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-AUG-1998 15,096.62 15,096.62 100.000000 31374GKMO 6.182% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -15,205.13 -15,205.13 100.000000 PD ----------- -108.51 -108.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,096.62 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-AUG-1998 -15,096.62 -15,096.62 100.000000 31374GKMO 6.182% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-AUG-1998 15,205.13 15,205.13 100.000000 PDC ----------- 108.51 108.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,096.62 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-AUG-1998 15,096.62 15,096.62 100.000000 31374GKM8 6.182% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -15,205.13 -15,205.13 100.000000 PD ----------- -108.51 -108.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,096.62 FNMA POOL 00313600 01-AUG-1990 -15,096.62 -15,096.62 100.000000 31374GKM8 6.182% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-AUG-1990 15,205.13 15,205.13 100.000000 PDC ----------- 108.51 108.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,096.62 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-AUG-1998 15,096.62 15,096.62 100.000000 31374GKMB 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -15,205.13 -15,205.13 100.000000 PD ----------- -100.51 -108.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -15,096.62 FNMA POOL /0313600 01-AUG-1998 15,096.62 15,096.62 100.000000 31374GKMO 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO O6/01/97 01-AUG-1998 15,096.62 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,739.88 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-AUG-1998 4,739.08 4,739.08 100.000000 31374GOW0 6.167% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -4,773.95 -4,773.95 100.000000 PD ----------- -34.07 -34.07 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 4,739.88 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-AUG-1998 -4,739.88 -4,739.86 100.000000 31374GOW0 6.167% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 02-AUG-1999 4,773.95 4,773.95 100.000000 PDC ----------- 34.07 34.07 1.000000000 Page 26 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,742.91 FNMA POOL 00313769 01-AUG-1998 4,742.91 4,742.91 100.000000 31374GQWO 6.167% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -4,777.00 -4,777.00 100.000000 PD ----------- -34.09 -34.09 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,742.91 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-AUG-1998 -4,742.91 -4,742.91 100.000000 31374GQWO 6.167% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-AUG-1998 4,777.00 4,777.00 100.000000 PDC ----------- 34.09 34.09 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,742.92 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-AUG-1998 4,742.92 4,742.92 100.000000 31374GONO 6.1671 05/01/2036 DD 09/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -4,777.01 -4,777.01 100.000000 PD ----------- -34.09 -34.09 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,742.92 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-AUG-1998 4,742.92 4,742.92 100.000000 31374GQWO 6.167% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-AUG-1998 4,742.92 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,487.77 FNMA POOL 00313783 02-AUG-1998 16,487.77 16,487.77 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/O1/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -16,606.28 -16,606.28 100.000000 PD ----------- -118.51 -118.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,487.77 FNMA POOL #0313783 01-AUG-1998 -16,487.77 -16,487.77 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-AUG-1998 16,606.28 16,606.28 100.000000 PDC ----------- 118.51 118.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,507.41 FNMA POOL *0313783 01-AUG-1998 16,507.41 16,507.41 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.157% 05/01/2036 DD 10/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -16,626.06 -16,626.06 100.000000 PD ----------- -118.65 -118.65 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,507.41 FNMA POOL #0313783 01-AUG-1998 16,507.41 16,507.41 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.1571 05/01/2036 DD 20/01/97 01-AUG-1998 16,507.41 0.00 100.000000 Page 27 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ FC 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,057.74 FNMA POOL 10339016 01-AUG-1998 11,057.74 11,057.74 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.1671 11/01/2035 DO 03/02/96 01-AUG-1999 -11,137.22 -11,137.22 100.000000 PD ----------- -79.48 -79.48 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -11,057.74 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-AUG-1998 11,057.74 11,057.74 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.167% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-AUG-1998 11,057.74 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,868.79 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-AUG-1999 26,868.79 26,869.79 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-AUG-1990 -26,868.79 -26,960.79 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -26,868.79 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-AUG-1998 26,868.79 26,868.79 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 15-AUG-1998 26,868.79 0.00 100.000000 PC 17-AUG-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -103,423.96 GNMA II POOL #0008684 01-AUG-1998 103,423.96 103,423.96 100.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 01-AUG-1990 -105,153.08 -205,253.08 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,729.12 -1,729.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -103,423.96 GNMA II POOL #0008694 01-AUG-1998 103,423.96 103,423.96 100.000000 36202KUHG 7.000% 08/20/2025 DD 08/01/95 01-AUG-1998 103,423.96 0.00 100.000000 FC 20-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -170,540.30 GNMA II POOL #0090023 01-AUG-1998 170,540.30 170,540.30 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.0001 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-AUG-1998 -173,364.87 -173,364.97 100.000000 PD ----------- -2,824.57 -2,824.57 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -170,540.30 GNMA II POOL 10080023 01-AUG-1998 170,540.30 170,540.30 100.000000 Pape 29 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN ]ASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-AUG-1998 170,540.30 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -294,664.85 GNMA II POOL 4080088M O1-AUG-1998 284,664.85 284,664.85 100.000000 36225CC20 7.0008 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-AUG-1998 -290,891.89 -290,891.89 100,000000 PD ----------- -6,227.04 -6,227.04 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -284,664.85 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 01-AUG-1998 284,664.85 284,664.85 100.000000 36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-AUG-1998 284,664.85 0.00 100.000000 FC 20-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,925,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC 21-AUG-1998 2,908,766.25 2,908,766.25 100.000000 313313C71 MAT 08/21/1998 21-AUG-1998 -2,908,766.25 -2,908,766.25 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 21-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL HTG ASSN DISC 07-AUG-1998 3,155,360.00 3,155,360.00 100.000000 313589A94 MAT 08/07/1998 07-AUG-1998 -3,155,360.00 -3,155,360.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 07-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 BANKERS TR NY CORP GLOBAL NT 11-AUG-1999 29,580.55 29,580.55 0.000000 066365DW4 FLTG AT 05/11/2003 DO 05/11/98 11-AUG-1998 29,580.55 0.00 0.000000 IT 11-AUG-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 224,729.30 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 17-AUG-1998 13,074.58 13,074.58 0.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-AUG-1998 13,074.58 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 15-JUL-1998 -15,768.04 -15,768.04 0.000000 17120QE80 FLTG RT O8/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 20-JUN-1998 -15,768.04 0.00 0.000000 Page 29 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ ITC 15-JUL-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 20-JUL-1998 15,768.04 15,768.04 0.000000 171200EBO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DD 04/08/98 20-JUL-1998 15,768.04 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-JUL-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CHRYSLER FIN MTN 19-AUG-1998 19,723.35 19,723.35 0.000000 17120QEBO FLTG RT 08/08/2002 DO 04/08/98 15-AUG-1998 19,723.35 0.00 0.000000 IT 19-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 383,631.96 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 17-AUG-1998 4,557.94 4,557.94 0.000000 21075WDKS 6.190% 10/15/2011 DD 11/23/96 01-AUG-1998 4,557.94 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 342,979.07 FHLMC GROUP /GS-0476 17-AUG-1998 101,315.79 101,315.79 0.000000 3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 01-AUG-1998 101,315.79 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -81,755.95 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 15-JUN-1998 -25,433.18 -25,433.18 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% OB/15/2032 02-MAY-1998 -25,433.18 0.00 0.000000 ITC 15-JUN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 73,157.68 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 17-AUG-1998 24,395.79 24,395.79 0.000000 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 01-JUL-1998 24,395.79 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF T11 A6 25-AUG-1998 10,B33.33 10,833.33 0.000000 3133TDPV2 6.500% 09/25/2018 01-AUG-1998 10,833.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,626.20 FHLMC MULTICL MTG P/C 1574 E 17-AUG-1998 6,671.85 6,671.85 0.000000 Page 30 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IRV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 3133T02D5 5.900% 06/15/2017 01-AUG-1998 6,671.85 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,925,000.00 FED FARM CA BK CONS DISC 21-AUG-1998 16,233.75 16,233.75 0.000000 313313C71 MAT 08/21/1998 21-AUG-1998 16,233.75 0.00 0.000000 IT 21-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,2DD,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 07-AUG-1998 44,640.00 44,640.00 0.000000 313589A94 MAT O8/07/1998 07-AUG-1998 44,640.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 07-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,301.65 FNMA POOL #0065581 25-AUG-1998 2,511.41 2,511.41 0.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-AUG-1998 2,511.41 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MTG ASSN MTN 20-AUG-1998 282,000.00 282,000.00 0.000000 31364BNF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 20-AUG-1998 282,000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PIMCO 7,644.28 FNMA POOL #0238575 25-AUG-1998 2,180.64 2,180.64 0.000000 3137006L8 6.210% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-AUG-1999 2,180.64 0.00 0.060000 IT 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 14,902.98 FNMA POOL #0313371 25-AUG-1998 4,866.41 4,868.41 0.000000 31374GCG0 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 01-AUG-1998 4,868.41 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,096.62 FNMA POOL #0313600 25-AUG-1998 4,726.00 4,726.00 0.000000 31374GKMB 6.160% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-AUG-1998 4,726.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 31 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1999 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 4,742.92 FNMA POOL #0313769 25-AUG-1998 1,148.54 1,148.54 0.000000 31374GOVO 6.1671 05/01/2036 DD 09/01/97 01-AUG-1998 1,148.54 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,507.41 FNMA POOL #0313783 25-AUG-1998 4,285.55 4,285.55 0.000000 31374GRC3 6.157% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-AUG-1998 4,205.55 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,057.74 FNMA POOL 10339016 25-AUG-1998 3,336.95 3,336.95 0.000000 31375MSD6 6.167% 11/01/2035 DD 03/01/96 01-AUG-1998 3,336.95 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 26,868.79 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 17-AUG-1998 1,875.29 1,875.29 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-AUG-1998 1,875.29 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 FORD MTR CA MTN TRANCHE 4TR 96 10-AUG-1598 58,305.75 58,305.75 0,000000 345402DZI FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 08-AUG-1998 59,305.75 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 103,423.96 GNMA II POOL #0008684 20-AUG-1998 10,025.89 10,025.89 0.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 01-AUG-1998 10,025.89 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 170,540.30 GNMA II POOL #0080023 20-AUG-1998 17,983.78 17,983.78 0.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-AUG-1998 17,993.78 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 284,664.85 GNMA II POOL i080088M 20-AUG-1998 26,765.22 26,765.22 0.000000 36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-AUG-1998 26,765.22 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 32 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 7M100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS SLOGS MTN 400196 17-AUG-1998 166,250.00 166,250.00 0.000000 52517PJD4 6.650% 11/08/2000 OD 11/08/96 15-AUG-1998 166,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 MORGAN ST DEAN NITTER SR NOTES 24-AUG-1999 100,786.35 100,786.35 0.000000 61745ELT6 FLTG AT 02/23/2000 DO 02/23/98 24-AUG-1998 100,786.35 0.00 0.000000 IT 24-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 17-AUG-1998 416,250.00 416,250.00 0.000000 718154BB2 9.250% 02/15/2000 15-AUG-1998 416,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 17-AUG-1998 279,125.00 278,125.00 0.000000 912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 15-AUG-1999 278,125.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-AUG-1998 375,000.00 375,000.00 0.000000 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 15-AUG-1998 375,000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-AUG-1998 156,250.00 156,250.00 0.000000 9128272L5 06.250% 02/28/2002 DD 02/28/97 31-AUG-1998 156,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 03-AUG-1998 19,000.00 19,000.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 03-AUG-1998 19,000.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 03-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 PAYABLE 08/03/98 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,800.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-AUG-1998 12,800.00 12,900.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 15-JUL-1998 12,800.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 33 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1998 - 31-AUG-1998 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LASS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,160.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-JUL-1998 -13,160.00 -13,160.00 0.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 15-JUL-1998 -13,160.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 31-JUL-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-JUL-1998 13,160.00 13,160.00 0.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 31-JUL-1998 13,160.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 31-JUL-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 PAYABLE 07/31/98 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-AUG-1998 78,125.00 78,125.00 0.000000 9128273G5 06.250% 08/31/2002 DD 09/02/97 31-AUG-1998 78,125.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SNORT TERM FOS INT ADJ 31-AUG-1998 -9,281.32 -9,281.31 0.000000 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 31-AUG-1998 -9,281.31 0.00 0.000000 CH AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 31-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-AUG-1998 662.94 662.94 0.000000 996085247 01-AUG-1998 662.94 0.00 0.000000 IT 04-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 04-AUG-1998 3,942.73 3,942.73 0.000000 996085247 01-AUG-1998 3,942.73 0.00 0.000000 IT 04-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 03-AUG-1998 15.62 15.62 0.000000 996087094 VAR NT DD 06/26/1997 01-AUG-1998 15.62 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-AUG-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 34 . _7 FAHRCOMMITTEE MeedngDrt ToW. 09/09/98 09/23/90 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Rem Nu ber Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1998 (FAHR98-65) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period April 1 through June 30, 1998. SUMMARY Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies,"and the"Long-Term Operating Monies," are managed by PIMCO, the District's extemal money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the District to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) %wdwWeoiev.dWnQiatr.neWAHWnHReets OFMRu AM R—,.m 1. Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Performance Reports The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for your reference. Also attached are two comparative bar charts which depict the sector diversification of the District's portfolios, as of March 31, 1998, and June 30, 1998. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of less than 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries, and corporate discount notes. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a summary of the performance of the District's portfolios managed by PIMCO for the period April 1 through June 30, 1998. a o is Perlormance Summery Quarter Ended June 30,1995 Liquid Operating Monies(%) Long-Term Operating Monies(%) Total Rat.of Return 3 Months 1.4 1.8 6 Months 2.1 3.'s 9 Months 4.2 5.5 12 Months 5.5 8.2 Since inception 30 Sept.95 5.6 7.0 Benchmark 3 Months 1.3 1.7 6 Months 2.6 3.2 9 Months 3.9 5.2 12 Months 5.2 7.5 Since Inception 30 Sept.95 5.3 6.6 Market Value per PIMCO 30 June 98 818.11A 3311.510 Average Quality 'AAA' 'AAA' Estimated Yield to Maturity 30 June 98 5.6% 5.7% Quarterly Deposits(Wandrewels) Estimated Annual Income 91.0 $19.7 Market Recap The second quarter of 1998 saw interest rates decline across the board based on renewed concern about the Asian economic crisis. This brought continued investor movement toward the relative safety and quality of U.S. dollar- denominated assets. With continued low inflation, and with some expectation of slower economic growth ahead, short-term interest rates were left unchanged by the Federal Reserve in the second quarter. \MCmlerblMy MNn\]1UcnMFAXg1FAHReal9aplFNlaaSaS.dm Rw : \ruse Page 2 v As depicted in the attached comparative graph of the "Historical Yield Curve," the Treasury yield curve flattened significantly during the second quarter, with longer rates dropping sharply. The benchmark 30-year Treasury rate declined approximately 30 basis points when compared to the end of the first quarter, 1998 (5.62% vs. 5.93%). Shorter rates showed modest changes. The 3-month Treasury rate declined 3 basis points (5.09% vs. 5.12%), and one-year rates dedined 1 basis point (5.36% vs. 5.37%). However, intermediate rates (from 1 to 10 years) declined significantly- up to 21 basis points in the second quarter (5.44% vs. 5.65%). As a result, relative returns were lower across the yield curve. For the Long-Tenn Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a weighted maturity or duration, slightly above the duration index (2.5 vs. 2.3 years), emphasizing holdings in high-quality mortgage backed securities, and investment grade corporate bonds. These investments contributed incremental yield to the portfolio when compared to the all-Treasury benchmark yields. The portfolio outperformed its benchmark (1.8%vs. 1.7%)for the second quarter. For the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained an at-index duration posture (approximately 72 days), and continued emphasizing U.S. Agency discount notes and high-quality corporate commercial paper in the portfolio. These investments added incremental yield to the portfolio, which outperformed its benchmark (1.4% vs.1.3%)for the second quarter. Portfolio Market Values Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table below, and in the attached bar chart. Lang-Temt Liquid Operating Quarter Operating Monies Ending Moti"(SM) ($M) 30 June 97 17.1 321.3 30 Sept.97 17.4 298.5 31 Dec.97 17.6 301.1 31 March 98 17.8 3060 30 June 9B 18.1 311.5 ALTERNATIVES N/A NNenW b1Mp.GhNnt[tOoaneU'PXMFN6�OWpEFAHRBSBSIx R.4..a 1,5118 Page 3 r d CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. PIMCO Report 2. Callan Report 3. Three Comparative Bar Charts 4. Historical Yield Curve Graph SKIc IYVEwWtl+My ChNn+IlQcnnel�AMRFANRBB�bpIFAXRBB85.Goc XwiwG. sse Page 4 Prepared by Finance, 8/3/98, 11:16 AM CSDOC Investment Management Program Quarter End Portfolio Values (Marked-to-Market) $350,000,000 $300,000,000 --- iii ----:....-.. _ ._ ♦��� iii $250,000,000 i i iii iii -...----------- iii....._-....... iii $200,000,000 $150,000,000 -- ---------- ♦�♦ ---- iii iii - .. iii - ♦�♦ ��� iii ---- ��� iii $50,000,000 ............_.....__ iii iii $0 iii ��� ♦�♦ ♦�♦ ��� 30 Jun 97 30 Sep 97 31 Dec 97 31 Mar 98 30 Jun 98 O Liquid Operating Monies ff] Long-Term Operating Monies G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\FinanceVinvestmgmtprogram Prepared by Finance, 813198, 11:21 AM CSDOC Liquid Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Diversification 100 ,00,00 90 80 70 60 ❑ 3/31/98 a) 50 0 6/30/98 a 40 30 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:\excel.dta\frn\2220Veggi\Finance\Portfolio short term Prepared by Finance,813/98. 11:22 AM CSDOC Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio Investment Diversification 100 90 80 70 ss ❑ 3/31/98 60 50 0 6/30/98 U 40 a 30 21 20 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash Equivalent G:\excel.dta\M\2220\geggi\FlnanceNPortfolio long term graph Prepared by Finance, 8/3/98, 2:66 PM HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE 6.s 6.0 e s w y 5.5 5.0 E E s s s s s a N N N M V N n O N M - 31-Dec-97 6 31-Mar-98 —30Jun-98 G:\excel.dta\fiM2220\geggKFinanceWislori alyieldcurve FAHR COMMITTEE Ne0ng0ate Tozer o99 091; AGENDA REPORT "`";;U,jbe j°P�'rn°' Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Don McIntyre, General Manager Originator. Greg Mathews, Assistant to the General Manager SUBJECT: FY 1997/98 END-OF-YEAR OPERATIONAL REPORT (FAHR98-66) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION This is an information item only. SUMMARY The Critical Goals Workplan and budgetary Performance Objectives are annual planning tools designed to assist staff in reaching best-in-class status. Staff and District-wide performance is compared to pre-set benchmark standards or milestone targets as reflected in these tools. This comparison is designed to show how well we have completed duties and responsibilities compared to our expectations. The FY 1997/98 Workplan, developed as a separate product and distributed to the Committee at the beginning of last fiscal year, details projects, programs, objectives and tasks designed to achieve District-wide Critical Goals. Milestones were identified that represented successful completion of a major task. Completion of these task milestones was identified as important to the success of the agency. Contained within the attached report is a matrix of the FY 97/98 Critical Goals. The budgetary performance objectives identify division-wide specific and measurable functions that staff are expected to perform. These objectives, detailed in the 1997/98 Budget, are indicative of major day-today or special project functions. Actual performance is measured against established benchmarks, and staff are held accountable for the results achieved. The FAHR Committee and Board have been kept apprised of quarterly progress regarding the workplan and performance objectives in the Financial& Operational Reports. At the end of the fiscal year, the Finance Department prepares a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR) that is presented to the FAHR Committee in November. As the CAFR replaces the financial component of the Financial& Operational Report, a stand-alone, end-of-year operational report is provided for the Committee's review. M:My.WYn�lIOCMIFNIHIFN,RB85aGffNIRW M.CC a«s.e. ,rsve Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not Applicable. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Divisions and departments overall achieved 76% of their year-end budgetary performance objectives. Although this is slightly below the 80% benchmark expected, it represents significant accomplishments. During a Board Budget Workshop last Spring, several Directors urged staff to elevate many departmentidivision performance objectives to best-in-class status. Staff complied with this request. As a result, however, some objectives have been missed as little room for error was provided. Regardless of our collective inability to achieve the 80% overall benchmark, staff believe we have generally performed very well, given the best-in-class performance expectations. Through FY 1997/98, the District completed 381 of 464 workplan tasks—82%. The District exceeded the 80% completion benchmark established, and although we were behind schedule on many tasks throughout the year, we were able to complete many delayed projects before the dose of the 4th quarter. Many of the missed workplan milestones were related to re-engineering efforts. The DART process has taken longer than expected and thus many workplan milestones associated with this effort were delayed. Efforts required for unplanned work, such as El Nino preparation, also contributed to delays in planned tasks. Moreover, the accelerated downsizing program placed us well below our end-of- year target of 549 FTEs and impacted our ability to complete tasks based on original workplan schedules. The attached report provides details related to performance objectives and workplan tasks. Staff will be available to answer questions regarding the content of this report. ALTERNATIVES Not Applicable. kwd�Wa ll ...VAHRvAH�� Rom, „� Page 2 0 CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable, ATTACHMENTS 1. End-of-Year Operational Report GM %WdunWftdll dl nUlUemnaWAHR HR� AHRB&M dm R.,. '/rea Page 3 FAHR COMMITTEE NeebRgoab, TaBa.OfDb. 09/09/9e 09/73/99 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Ite N ber 14(b) /� Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: SOURCE CONTROL PERMIT USER FEES (FAHR98-67) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve the revised rates for flow, BOD and suspended solids for Class I and Class II Source Control Permit Users. SUMMARY Up to the 1991-92 fiscal year, Source Control Permit User Fees were revised each year based upon actual costs for the prior year and adopted by the Boards of Directors. Between 1991-92 and this year, the fees have been unchanged. The original reasons for retaining the existing fees were based upon staffs desire and the Directors' decision to delay fee increases and discretionary work during the recession and funding shortfalls in the member agencies. More recently, adjustments have been delayed while the Rate Advisory Committee process was completed and a revised rate structure was approved for all users. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Approximately $8 million each year is paid by Class I and Class 11 permittees. An analysis of the top 20 users indicates the proposed rates will be relatively neutral, and total revenues will remain the same. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Nadon al lM E %hnUlft TAHWAHR9915 0FAHRO"7 dx Renam wmree Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please see attached staff report. ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt a different fee schedule. 2. Retain existing fee schedule. CEOA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Report 2. Source Control User Fees %"ftnWaW1N .M VnQ1 Pc—TAHRTAHRU0 p6fAHRB 7dm R.n..d. WlWa Paget 0 September 9, 1998 STAFF REPORT Source Control Permit User Fees One provision of the Clean Water Act and the 1979 Revenue Program adopted by the Boards of Directors to comply with the Act is user fees for significant industrial dischargers. These dischargers are issued permits by the Source Control Division, are sampled each quarter, and are billed based upon the actual strength and quantity of their wastewater. Up to the 1991-92 fiscal year, these fees were revised each year based upon actual costs for the prior year and adopted by the Boards of Directors. Between 1991-92 and this year, the fees have been unchanged. The original reasons for retaining the existing fees were based upon staffs desire and the Directors' decision to delay fee increases and discretionary work during the recession and funding shortfalls in the member agencies. More recently, adjustments have been delayed while the Rate Advisory Committee process was completed and a revised rate structure was approved for all users. In fact, the methodology used for the RAC proposal is the same as that previously used for the Source Control Permit Users' rate calculations. Now the rates for flow, BOD and solids can be the same for all types of users, whether or not they have a permit. This single or unified structure will make the fees much easier to explain and will eliminate confusion over the basis of our user fee program. Total fees from this program approximate $8 million each year. The existing rates, adopted in 1991-92, and the proposed rates are shown below. The proposed rates include the assumptions that all property tax revenue continues to be used for COP service and that future capital improvements are shared 50:50 between borrowing and pay-as-you-go. 1991-92 Rates Proposed Rates BOO Solids Domestic Flow Boo Solids Domestic %Change Zone Flow per per per per per Domestic per MG 1000M 100DN Equivalent MG 1000M 100DN Equivalent Equivalent 1 205.49 162.25 206.10 79.48 271.08 223.04 213.39 1 96.41 21% 2 206.94 146.58 186.20 73.77 208.07 171.19 163.79 74.00 3 265.28 145.67 185.04 78.82 212.28 174.66 167.11 75.50 4% 5 297.30 154.63 196.42 85.12 237.69 195.48 187.03 84.50 6 167.11 130.42 165.67 64.07 222.13 182.76 174.86 79.00 23% 7 339.87 147.38 187.21 86.34 168.70 138.81 132.80 60.00 30% 11 278.33 136.56 173.46 76.62 224.94 185.07 177.07 80.00 4% 13 400.94 103.36 131.30 75,57-T 281.17 231.34 221.34 100.001 32% OCSD a P.O.Box 8127 a Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 • (714) 962-2411 Source Control Permit User Fees Page 2 of 2 September 9, 1998 The columns with "Domestic Equivalent"in their headings are the calculated annual user fees for wastewater strength and quantity equivalent to the single-family-residential discharge. It is shown for comparison only. Because of changes in the underlying assumptions, this calculation matches the 1998-99 fees, but varies widely for the 1991- 92 fees. Generally, the impact on permit users will be a shift of costs to flow and solids and away from BOD discharges. These changes are due to reallocations of operating costs and capital projects to more properly reflect the impact of each of these parameters in accordance with the Carollo Engineers and Camp, Dresser& McKee work during the RAC process. The attached schedule, Sample Impact of Proposed Rates, shows the current and proposed changes and the impacts for twenty of our largest dischargers based upon the actual quantity and strength of their wastewater. In most cases, the charges are not significant and are less than the charges adopted in each of the past two years for the user fees collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill. Staff recommends adoption of the proposed Class I and II Permit user rates for 1998-99, consistent with the rates adopted for general sewer service user fees. GGS:Ic WadonWettl\wp.dteVm@WWranetFAHR\FAHRgBZeptZtaffRepor Perml UF,doc 8/19/98 5:06 PM Sample Impact of Proposed Rates Class I and Class II Permit Users Como zone Flow M U 1991-92 Charges Proposed Charges Increase % m9m Mail M90 FIDW BOD 0 Total Flw §Q lu TTolsl I45fa25al Chenoe Cherry Tedron 1 18.50 98 178 S 3,802 $ 3,372 $ 6,860 $ 13,034 $ 5,015 $ 3,372 $ 5.860 $ 14,247 $ 1,213 9.31% El Metals 1 3.90 663 46 801 4,810 319 5,930 1,057 4,810 319 6.186 256 4.32% El Toro Meal Slop 1 3.28 2,482 522 674 15,143 3,047 18,864 889 15,143 3,047 19,079 215 1.14% L8N Uniform 1 7.98 472 334 1,640 7.006 4.743 13,389 2,163 7,006 4,743 13,912 523 3.91% Adohr Farms 2 67.70 2,777 981 14.010 268,416 90,722 373,148 14,086 268,416 90,722 373,224 76 0.02% Aaahelm Citrus 2 55.64 482 674 11.493 36,636 51.135 99,263 11,556 36,635 51,135 99,326 63 0.06% Coca Cola 2 26.50 3,517 421 5,484 133,065 15,240 153.789 5.514 133.065 15,240 153,819 30 0.02% Disneyland 2 374.70 208 219 77,640 110,203 112,094 299,837 77,964 110,203 112,094 300.261 424 0.14% Kimberly Clerk 2 578.33 127 269 119,680 104,863 212,511 437.054 120,333 104.863 212,511 437,707 653 0.15% Precision Anodizing 2 20.29 9 634 4,199 261 17,572 22.032 4.222 261 17,572 22,055 23 0.10% Cargill 3 9.30 580 289 2,467 7,857 3.746 14,070 1,974 7,857 3,746 13,677 (493) (3.5D)% Georgia Pacific 3 6.62 3,573 99 1,766 34,455 913 37,124 1,405 34.455 913 36,773 (351) (0.95)% Lucky Stores I Cmi 3 8.90 2,153 915 2.361 27.912 11.350 41,623 1.859 27,912 11,350 41.151 (472) (1.13)% Lucky Stores Milk 3 32.73 1,695 610 8,683 80,812 27,826 117.321 6,948 80.812 27,826 115,586 (1,735) (1.46)% Pepsi Cola 3 66.52 1,647 302 17,646 159,590 27,998 205,234 14,121 159,590 27,998 201,709 (3,525) (1.72)% Fairview Des 6 3579 354 168 5,981 19,311 8.769 34,061 7,950 19.311 8,769 36,030 1,969 5.78% West Newport Oil 6 75.17 373 41 12.562 42,737 4,495 59,794 16,698 42,737 4,495 63,930 4,136 6.92% Maruchan 7 15.73 2.516 204 5.346 45.817 3.564 54,717 2,654 45,817 3,554 52.025 (2,692) (4.92)% Moo" 7 153.18 123 51 52.051 21.812 8,652 82.525 25,841 21.812 8,652 56,305 (25,220) (31.77)% Torch Operating Co 11 60.08 137 88 13,939 10,590 6,508 31.037 11,285 10.590 6,508 28,363 (2,674) (8.62)% Total $ 362.126 $ 1.134.667 $ 617,054 $ 2.113,846 $ 333,544 $ 1,134,687 $ 617,054 $ 2,085,265 S (28.551) (1.35)% G:leace1.dlalfln12l(tsbeed%cld d ccpylOLD DlSTRATPLNWss fee permits 98-99x18 BOARD OF DIRECTORS ! ng Dace To ad.of Dir. 9/23/98 AGENDA REPORT nr Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN, JOB NO. J-40-4: DESIGNATION OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FOR DEVELOPING THE DRAFT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Receive and file Staff Report dated September 23, 1998. 2. Direct Staff to proceed with preparation of the Strategic Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, designating the preferred alternative as follows: 1. Level of Treatment • Discharge a blend of primary and secondary effluent to meet the requirements of our 1998 ocean discharge permit. 2. Water Reclamation • Participate in Phase 1 of Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR System) with the Orange County Water District and contribute up to $125 million (50%) of the capital cost. 3. Peak Flow Management • Utilize existing in-plant storage to mitigate peak flows; • Participate in Phase 1 of the GWR System to provide 100 mgd of peak wet weather flow relief, and 50 mgd average daily flow; • Rely on the 78-inch ouffall for emergency discharge of secondary effluent at an estimated frequency of once every 3 years by the year2020. SUMMARY During the Strategic Planning process, District staff, consultants, and the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) have evaluated several alternatives for managing peak flows, level of treatment, and water reclamation. Staff is requesting that the Board designate a preferred alternative for development of the Strategic Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The preferred alternative will be developed in detail in the Strategic Plan documents. Staff wants to emphasize that designating a preferred alternative is G:NIBIOOaMgenGa OrzM1 flepamVunl noaML9139MV W RGrc aa�aa . eaasa Page 1 not the same as choosing an alternative or deciding on a course of action. A preferred alternative is a reference point from which other alternatives will be compared. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the draft EIR will compare other alternatives with the preferred alternative. The Strategic Plan Program EIR process must be completed in accordance with CEQA before any project approval or decision is made to commit to a Strategic Plan alternative. At this time, Staff is only seeking guidance from the Board on the designation of a preferred alternative for further development of the Strategic Plan and preparation of the draft EIR PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Upon adoption of the Strategic Plan and certification of a final EIR (currently scheduled for June 1999), a final capital and Operations and Maintenance (0&M) cost estimate will be established. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The preferred alternative will include options for: (1) level of treatment, (2) water reclamation, and (3) peak flow management. These alternatives are described below and in the attached Table 1 and Table 3. LEVEL OF TREATMENT Scenarios - Four treatment scenarios have been developed in the Strategic Plan: Scenario 1: 1998 Ocean Discharge Permit Limits Without GWR System — For this scenario, the 1998 ocean discharge permit requirements will govern the amount of secondary treatment required. The GWR System will not be on-line. Scenario 2: 1998 Ocean Discharge Permit Limits With GWR System — Scenario 2 is similar to Scenario 1, except that the GWR System is on-line. For Scenario 2, the amount of secondary treatment will be governed by the needs of the GWR System and the ocean discharge permit requirements. Scenario 3: Full Secondary Treatment. without GWR System — For Scenario 3, all of the District's flow will receive secondary treatment prior to discharge, and the GWR System will not be on-line. c mgftbaMe.nd.D,.n ReR Olt IftM2R ttpan do: R_.ad � Page 2 Scenario 4: Full Secondary Treatment. with GWR System — Scenario 4 is similar to Scenario 3, except that the GWR System is on-line. For comparison with these four scenarios, the following information for the present level of treatment, i.e. providing secondary treatment for 50 percent of the ocean discharge, is presented: Scenario 5: Fifty Percent Secondary Treatment Without GWR System - For this scenario, the effluent to the ocean must meet the ocean discharge permit limits, and must be comprised of at least 50 percent secondary effluent. The GWR System will not be on-line- Scenario 6: Fifty Percent Secondary Treatment with GWR System - For Scenario 6, the amount of secondary treatment to be provided is governed first by the amount needed for the GWR System. The effluent remaining to be discharged to the ocean must meet ocean discharge permit limits, and must be comprised of at least 50 percent secondary effluent. Present Policy -The District's current practice is to discharge a blend of 50 percent primary effluent and 50 percent secondary effluent to the ocean. This practice follows the level of treatment policy that was adopted when the 1989 Master Plan Program EIR was certified after considering all aspects of the environment (land, air and water). The District cannot deviate from this adopted policy by decreasing the percentage of the ocean discharge receiving secondary treatment (increasing the percentage receiving primary treatment only) until a new EIR is certified. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 1998, the District discharged 17,400 metric tons of suspended solids.' The current ocean discharge permit, issued in June 1998, limits the District's discharge of suspended solids to a maximum of 20,000 metric tons per year. Other discharge limits are summarized in Table 2, attached. According to the Strategic Plan analysis, the District can achieve these permit requirements with a blend of 33 percent secondary treatment and 67 percent primary treatment under current flows. The percentage of secondary treatment required to meet the current permit limits increases over time as the District's flow increases. The District's Commitment to the Community—The District must provide a level of treatment that meets our commitment to protect public health, ocean recreation, fishing, and the environment. In addition, the District must pursue a level of treatment policy that responsibly manages air, land, water and energy resources. Suspended solids are the finely divided particles remaining in wastewater after treatment which give it a cloudy appearance. G MybMMpeMa dNl RepeRSUwn1 Ewm9paROx Rye: vitae Page 3 Under any scenario, the District must also continue its aggressive efforts to control sources of toxic pollutants. The District will also continue to conduct monitoring studies and research to verify the health of the ocean environment. We will also continue to keep regulators and the community fully informed of our environmental protection efforts. The District's operations must also comply with the requirements of the 1998 ocean discharge permit. The 1998 permit is based on the Federal Clean Water Act, and the Porter Cologne Act and Ocean Plan of the State of California. The permit requirements were established to maintain a natural and healthy ecosystem around the District's outfall, to protect recreational use of the beaches and ocean, and to promote water reclamation. The requirements of the permit are summarized in Table 2. Marine Environment— Under our present level of treatment, (50 percent secondary) the suspended solids discharge is approximately 17,000 metric tons per year. If we move from our present level of treatment to that 998 ocean discharge permit limit of 20,000 metric tons of solids per year, there is a potential for increased organic loading and solids accumulation in sediments near the outfall. This increase in solids is unlikely to significantly impact sediment quality or marine fife. In fact, Staff does not expect marine life to be impacted if our suspended solids discharge is less than 30,000 metric tons per year. Of course, the District will monitor the ocean for changes associated with our discharge. Our present sampling program provides the ability to detect changes quickly and change operating practices if adverse conditions are detected. If changes to the ecosystem are detected, they can be reversed over time by controlling the quality of our effluent. For reference, our historical discharge of suspended solids and metals are shown in Figures 1 and 2, attached. Impacts to the marine environment for the scenarios developed in the Strategic Plan will be analyzed in detail in the Strategic Plan Draft Program EIR. Staff would recommend no scenario that is found to be harmful to the environment or public health as an alternative. Level of Treatment Scenarios Cost Comoarison - Estimated capital and operating and maintenance (O&M) costs for the six level of treatment scenarios are given in Table 1 and are discussed below. These costs are for the District's treatment facilities only and do not include the $125 million share of Phase 1 GWR System costs or outfall improvement costs. (Outfall and GWR System costs are included in Table 5, 2020 Discharge Alternatives.) The 1998 ocean discharge permit limit scenarios (Scenarios 1 and 2) have roughly the same capital and O&M costs with and without Phase 1 of the GWR System. The costs are nearly equal because the amount of secondary treatment required to meet the 1998 permit limits is the same, with or without the GWR System. G.MIpU ewaG WeabWM&a,OW]9BiY4aRYc R. � Page 4 Our present operating practice, 50 percent secondary treatment without the GWR system (Scenario 5) also has roughly the same capital cost as the 1998 permit limit scenarios (Scenarios 1 and 2). Scenario 5 has a higher O&M cost in 2003 because operation of more secondary facilities is required initially. The 50 percent secondary scenario with the GWR System (Scenario 6) has much higher capital and O&M costs than the 1998 permit limit scenarios (Scenarios 1, 2) and 50 percent secondary treatment without the GWR System (Scenario 5). These higher costs are for the additional secondary treatment required to provide 50 percent secondary effluent in the ocean discharge. These additional capital costs would total about$50 million through 2020, with higher O&M costs as well. Capital and O&M costs for full secondary treatment (Scenarios 3 and 4) are much more expensive than the other scenarios, and our ocean discharge permit does not require full secondary treatment. WATER RECLAMATION The Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR System) is a proposed joint water reclamation project between the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District. The GWR system will use microfiltration, reverse osmosis, granular activated carbon, and disinfection to treat secondary effluent to consistently and reliably meet drinking water standards. This process is an update to the process that has been successfully used by Water Factory 21 for more than 20 years. Water produced by the GWR System will be used for replenishment of the Orange County Groundwater Basin (Basin), to augment the existing Water Factory 21 seawater intrusion barrier, and to provide water for other reuse alternatives that are identified over time. Water Supply —The GWR System will be designed to produce 50,000 acre-feet of water per year in Phase 1, or enough to supply 100,000 families. The GWR System is planned with two primary water supply benefits in mind. First, it provides a long-term water supply to those communities with access to the Basin. Second, because the GWR System will continue to operate unaffected during droughts, more water can be pumped from the Basin during a drought. This additional pumping will make scarce imported water supplies available to those communities that rely solely on imported water. Increased use of groundwater basins during droughts is one of the efforts that will be required of Metropolitan Water District to qualify for state provided drought relief water supplies under the Cal Fed program. (Other measures include water storage and water conservation programs.) In addition to water supply benefits, the high quality and low dissolved mineral content of GWR System water is projected to improve groundwater quality in the Basin over the long term. 11¢OfRG®B1Y,typgMppWf pyl PgpYUpN B.Y W00]®.bp60x R..a.e: vxim Page 5 Peak Flow Relief- The GWR System will be designed to have peak capacity to provide 100 mgd of outfall flow relief during peak storms. To provide this peak storm flow capacity, 78 mgd of microfilters will be installed, which can be operated at a peak flow of 100 mgd for short durations. In addition, the GWR System will be designed with standby power generation to ensure operation, if commercial power is lost in a storm. PEAK FLOW MANAGEMENT The District must make a decision regarding the management of flows during wet weather high flow events. It is projected that peak flows to the plants will reach approximately 750 mgd by the year 2020. Current capacity of the District's discharge facility, the 120-inch ocean outfall, is 480 mgd. To handle the flows in excess of this 480 mgd capacity, the District can choose from a number of options. These options include the following: • Retard peak flows by use of on-site storage • Divert flow (up to 100 mgd)to the GWR System • Discharge secondary effluent (as a minimum) to either the emergency 78-inch outfall or the Santa Ana River • Increase the outfall system capacity by constructing a 15,000-foot parallel barrel or a second outfall The Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), which was formed in September 1996 to review technical information and make recommendations to the Board regarding the peak flow management program, was asked in July 1998 to finalize their recommendations. After careful consideration of the data presented, the majority of the PAC members supported a program that utilized the 78-inch outfall for excess flows, avoided or delayed construction of additional ouffall capacity, and maximized use of the GWR System to reduce the use of the 78- inch outfall. There was also some support for construction of additional storage on the plant site(s) to further reduce the frequency of use of the 78-inch emergency outfall. It is Staffs belief that the environmental and public health impacts of any use of the 78-inch outfall can be minimized by the use of innovative technology (such as the microfiltration technology planned for the GWR System) to enhance treatment of the effluent discharged through the 78-inch outfall. Such a plan should be investigated in concert with the implementation of the peak flow management program. ALTERNATIVES Alternatives, including continuing with our current level of treatment are described above. Vmmemutxipee¢�men nro Uu awa+oszamN,penam q�, „ten Page 6 CEQA FINDINGS The Strategic Plan Programmatic EIR process must be completed in accordance with CEOA before any project approval or decision is made to commit to a Strategic Plan alternative. Staff is seeking guidance from the Board on the designation of a preferred alternative for preparation of the draft EIR in accordance with CEQA. Completion of a Draft EIR is scheduled for March, 1999, at which time a formal public review could begin. Board consideration of certification of the final EIR addressing all the issues raised during public review is scheduled for June 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Table 1: Strategic Plan Level of Treatment Scenarios: Estimated Treatment Plant Costs 2. Table 2: Summary of 1998 Ocean Discharge Permit Requirements 3. Figure 1: OCSD Historic Ocean Solids Discharge 4. Figure 2: OCSD Historic Ocean Toxics Discharge 5. Table 3: 2020 Discharge Alternatives c amme.n`e. e.m.n nw�uom e�wmexmuw ne« Page 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Table 1 STRATEGIC PLAN LEVEL OF TREATMENT SCENARIOS ESTIMATED TREATMENT PLANT COST, MILLIONS- WITHOUT GWR SYSTEM WITH GWR SYSTEM " PHASE 1 1998 PERMIT LIMITS Scenario 1 Scenario 2 capital lhru 2020 352 350 annual O&M 2003 29 29 annual O&M 2020 39 38 FULL SECONDARY Scenario 3 Scenario 4 capital lhru 2020 687 708 annual O&M 2003 40 41 annual O&M 2020 48 49 60% SECONDARY TO OCEAN Scenario 6 Scenario 6 Capital thru 2020 352 404 annual O&M 2003 35 35 annual O&M 2020 39 41 'ALL COSTS IN 1998 DOLLARS,0&M ESTIMATES ACCURATE TO-1.$2 MILLION "OCSD TREATMENT FACILITIES COSTS ONLY,DOES NOT INCLUDE$125 M CONTRIBUTION TO GWRS 99eecel.dtaWngV2D%erberg\LEVELOFTREATMENTCOST 9n ar98 r Table 2 Summary of 1998 Ocean Discharge Permit Requirements Key Final Effluent Parameter Limiting Permit Conditions Total suspended solids 60 mgn Annual Average Total suspended solids 72 mgll 30-day Average or 75% removal Total suspended solids 20,000 metric tons per year Annual Average Biochemical Oxygen Demand 100 mgll 90-day Average Acute Toxicity 1.5 Toxic Units-30-day Average Receiving Water Limitations Limiting Permit Conditions Bacterial Water Contact Standards- Nearshore Total coliform <1,000/100 mil (no more than 20% may exceed this and no single sample >10.0001100 mi. Fecal coliform geometric mean<200/100 ml and no more than 10% >230/100 mi. Shellfish Harvesting Standards - Nearshore Median total coliform<70/100 ml and no more than 10%>230/100 mi. Light transmittance No significant reduction outside of zone of initial dilution. Solids deposition Shall not change sediments such that benthic communities are degraded. Dissolved oxygen Shall not be depressed more than 10%from naturally occurring levels. Toxics and nutrients Shall not be at levels that result in levels that degrade marine life. Shall not result in accumulation in marine resources used for human consumption to levels that are harmful to health. Summary of EPA Findings in Granting New Five-Year Permit: 1. The OCSD discharge will meet all California Ocean Plan and EPA water quality criteria. A high degree of initial dilution is achieved. 2. Monitoring data indicated slight accumulation of solids or organic material in sediments. Historical discharge of suspended solids since 1985 do not significantly degrade benthic communities. Deposition models indicate that the discharge of up to 20,000 Metric Tons per year will not result in substantial increases in solids deposition near the outfall diffuser and will not significantly alter the outfall's impact on the biological communities. 3. The discharge is not likely to result in increase concentration of toxics in marine sediments. Chemical concentrations in sediments have decreased since 1985 and are at or approaching background levels except for elevated levels on some metals. Existing concentrations do not appear to be having negative effects on marine communities. OCSD Suspended Solids Loads 1977-1997 Effluent Mass Emissions to Ocean 50000 40000 m d c I 1998 Ocean 30000 Discharge Permit Limit zo0oo r c c Q 10000 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 —12-Month Moving Average FIGURE 1 OCSD Metals Reduction Trends Influent and Effluent Reduction Trends 3500 INFLUENT 3000 -EFFLUENT 2500 W 2000 W IL m M C 1500 3 IL 1000 500 0 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 (Annual Average FIGURE 2 Table 3 Year 2020 Discharge Alternatives Collection System Treatment Facilities Storage Outfall Use the 78" 0 MG $28,200,000 DI Permit Limits (w/o GWR) 1 $0 O Use BAR 0 Straight Upsizing $350,000,000 I o 1 7 MG $26,500,000 $185,000,000 Q Permit Limits (w/GWR)* U $0 New 15,000-Ft Barrel $475,000,000 0 40 MG 0 $108,700,000 $54,300,000 4 New 120" $149,500,000 Alternatives Collection Treatment Storage Outfall Estimated Estimated Frequency of Use System Facilities Option Option Capital Cost Annual Dam Cost78" SAR Planned Use of the TS/SAR A I U sizin w/o GWR 7 MG SAR $560m $39m 0 1.7 times per yr Emergency Use of the MSAR «« B Upsizing w/GWR 7 MG 78" $690m $38m 1 time per 3 yre 0 _ C U sizin w/GWR 40 MG 78" $740m $38m i time per 7 yrs 0 D Upsizin w/o GWR 7 MG New Barrel $640m $39m 1 time per 5 yrs 0 E U sizin w/GWR 40 MG New Barrel $820m $38m 0 0 F U sizin w/o GWR 0 MG New 120" $680m $39m 0 0 G U sizing w/GWR 0 MG New 120" $810m $38m 0 0 Today 1998 1998 w/o GWR I 7 MG 1 78" 1 13 times per 5 Yrs 0 •Phow1mesmly. Usetl S125mfor OSDOC'sGWRo Inbutlon •«Sf«e p,elerratl N(amWha J ,a f A '# _. End of Year ended 1j cc G THE Orange County Sanitation District t„P � # . 1 q4 { M l 7 � > t Overview The Strategic Goals Workplan and budgetary Performance Objectives are annual planning tools designed to assist staff in reaching best-in-class status. The workplan details projects, programs, objectives and tasks designed to achieve District-wide Strategic Goals. The budgetary performance objectives identify — division-wide specific and measurable functions that staff are expected to perform. This performance is compared to pre-set benchmark standards and is designed to show how well we have completed duties and responsibilities compared to our expectations. The FAHR Committee and Board have been kept apprised of quarterly progress regarding the workplan and performance objectives in the Financial& Operational Reports. At the end of the fiscal year, the Finance Department prepares a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR)that is presented to the FAHR Committee in November. As the CAFR replaces the financial component of the Financial& Operational Report, a stand-alone, end-of-year operational report is provided and represented herein. Divisions and departments overall achieved 75% of their year-end budgetary performance objectives. Although this is slightly below the 80% benchmark " expected, it represents significant accomplishments. During a Board Budget Workshop last Spring, several Directors urged staff to elevate many department/division performance objectives to best-in-class status. Staff complied with this request. As a result, however, some objectives have been missed as little room for error was provided. Regardless of our collective inability to achieve the 80% overall benchmark, staff believe we have generally performed very well, given the best-in-class performance expectations. Through FY 1997/98, the District completed 381 of 464 workplan tasks— 82%. The District exceeded the 80% completion benchmark established, and although we were behind schedule on many tasks throughout the year, we were able to .. complete many delayed projects before the close of the 4' quarter. Many of the missed workplan milestones were related to re-engineering efforts. The DART process has taken longer than expected and thus many workplan milestones associated with this effort were delayed. Efforts required for unplanned work, such as El Nino preparation, also contributed to delays in planned tasks. Moreover, the accelerated downsizing program placed us well below our end-of- year target of 549 FTEs and impacted our ability to complete tasks based on original workplan schedules. The following tables provide division by division details on the performance objectives and workplan tasks. Critical Goals For Fiscal Year 1997-98 M Implement 08M's Provide Technical Prwide Stag Support Complete Rate Complete IT Establish Ongoing Implement Districts Reinvention Suppon far to OCWD/CSDOC Study wim RAC and SVategic Plan Programs rl i Broad Bantling and Assessment Amendmem to Board C°^xn Implement Nov, County,City COG Progam Team Basin Plan Financial Program Recommendations Establish Financial Strategy Complete Provltle Support far Improve Secore EPA NPDES re9Y Work with PAC to Implementation OCR Outreach Performance Consolidate Dlmlc[s Pmmti and 301 m) Define Options for of FIS Evaluation Program Wavier Enhanced Capacity la Non-exempts Establish Governance Address Support RAGPAC Complete Strel k Pkn Engineering Dept Restructre Ocean StrucWre pevelop Flux Implementation � Implement Adaptive Monaan am of LIMSWork Force IIssueszauonal Progr Complete Initial OptionswementM PAC Establish Legislative Strategies Regarding Technical Studies Outreach Training Provide Focused Inblere Record Complete and Research for Complete Evaluation Management antl Monilor Five-year Improved Develop of Treatment Document ConVols Support Conduct Internal Staffing Plans Productivity Commumcahons Strategies Program in Consalldation Audit Team Studies Strategy for Engineering and Pudic Oweach Board Secretary's Review and Office Establish Industrial! Implement Ada Complete Refine Work Force Adaptive ImpleCost-ment ty Impact Report Commercial Bearch Programarking Implement New Develop Water Impact for Technical Center am Strategies Title 5 Air Quality Conservation Strel Ic P¢la Complete Plant wog Districts'-wide, e9 Regs. Cooperative Funding Automation Master and Programs Plan Provide Reulsed Provide Board wfth HR Policies and Restructure Results of Collections Progroml Stakeholder Cornett Existing Procedures es Manual Evaluations Using Engineering Training CDM Decision Model Drawings to Review laborarory Electronic Format Processes(LIMS) Initiate Pertormance-based Upgade CMMS Budget Studies Evaluate OULsaurcing and Insourcing Evaluate Establish Opportunities for InterneUlnVanet Quantifiable GSA, Slantlartls for Technical Servkes Quality,and and Gommunkations Rekabilay Implement iiiiiiiiin All Department Heads Delegation of Administration in the lead Aulherty Task Force Recommendations Operations in the lead aawa"t`a" rzavr csooc Performance Objectives GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE General Management Administration (Division 110) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year Ensure treatment cost does $491/MG $463/1AG Cost below Gallonage charge due to not exceed target by end of Increased Flows and lower expenditures. fiscal year m Ensure District meets 549 FTEs by end 531.5 FTEs at and of Full-time equivalent count was 3.2%below adopted five year staffing of fiscal year fiscal year target. plan Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Plant 2 construction impacted removal Demand(BOD)and Total 73%TSS 76%/67%TSS Pi/P2 figures. See operations section for further Suspended Solids(TSS) 49%BOp 54�/42 i°BOD P1/P2 details. r removals in primary tmatmen process Maintain 100%Compliance 100% 100% Target met. with Permit Compliance Reduce Small Line Cleaning $0.20/11near foot $0.27/1inear foot Cost includes televising of 10%of lines, costs through contracting which was not Incorporated in original r projection. Engineering Change Orders 5%or less of 2.3% Target met and well below industry no greater than target contract benchmarks. amount Ensure District Performance 80% 75%Performance Both Performance objectives and Workplan Objectives and Workplan Performance Objectives milestone tasks approached benchmark milestones met within Objectives 82%Workplan targets. Missed objectives or milestones were targets 80%Workplan Milestones largely related to re-engineering delays in Milestones many administrative/operational areas, r especially those related to the DART process, as well as extremely aggressive performance objectives beyond industry standards. Total Dislrlct-wWe Not Workplan Tasks For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 464 381 (82%) 34 49 Workplan milestones were not accomplished in many areas as re-engineering improvements in many administrative/operational areas,especially ® those related to DART,have been delayed. It appears that based on aggressive downsizing this fiscal year,the existing staff is over-committed with originally planned Workplan tasks. Section 1 -Page 1 1997-98 End-of-Year Report FINANCE DEPARTMENT s, Finance Administration (Division 210) Performance Objective 1997-99 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year Average Annualized Rate 6% 6.1% The portfolios(long/short term and cash flow of Return on Investments management)outperformed their respective benchmarks. Figures based on current yield calculations. Average Interest Rate 4% 3,49% 0.5%is equivalent to approximately$950K Paid on Certificate of annually in interest savings based on variable Participation(COP) rate COPs that are not protected by a long-term Borrowing interest rate exchange agreement. Remain at or under the $43.9 Million by $42.9 million through Expenses were controlled well. New cost net Joint Operating(J.O.) end of fiscal end of fiscal year allocations models resulting from Financial d year (97.6%) Information System and the Multi-agency benchmarking study resulted in mid-year budget adjustment from$46.9 million to$43.9 million as appropriate expenses were transferred from the J.O.budget. Total Workplan Tasks Not For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 40 29 (73%) 6 5 Most milestones that are behind are related to new rates and fee structures,which has been postponed due to numerous circumstances. Section 1 - Page 2 Performance Objectives FINANCE DEPARTMENT Accounting (Division 220) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year r Issue monthly financial 92% 33% Due to technical/administrative problems reports within 10 working Incurred during JD Edwards Financial days Information System(FIS)cost allocation module implementation,development of reports for most months have been delayed. Problems were addressed and on-time performance was achieved in the fourth quarter with the exception of Julys `—' year-end report. Develop FIS Training 90%trained by 100% The training program has been developed program year end and Implemented and all'Train the Trainer"staff have been instructed. Take advantage of all bade 90%of time See Summary Trade discounts will be taken in the 4' discounts through timely Quarter after the implementation stage. In payment processing all but one instance,the appropriate bade discounts were obtained. .� Identify 6,000 unclassified 90%+identified 8,864 Parcels identified Obtained CD-ROM listing of parcels and parcels (148%) Identified'unclassified"parcels. Most were mobile home parcels in mobile home parks. Total Workplan Not Tasks Started For FY 97.98 Complete Behind Summary of Data m 37 35(95%) 1 1 Delays due to awaiting results of independent Finance Operational Audit. Section 1 -Page 3 1997-98 End-of-Year Report FINANCE DEPARTMENT Purchasing&Warehousing (Division 230) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Summary of Data Target Through End-of- Year Maintain cycle count 97%,Accuracy 95 Y Due to earthquake rehabilitation in the program Rating warehouse during one quarter,cycle counts were slightly lower thus impacting year-end benchmark. Establish Complete by Completed The filing system is in place. It requires contracts/purchasing"best- 1198 additional time but is expected to improve in-class filing system effectiveness. Revise asset tagging Complete by Policy written, This project is behind completion due to procedures 3/98 continuing lack of staff resources in the Warehouse. implementation Develop formal contract Complete by Completed This project is completed. terms and conditions 10/97 Develop supplier"hot line Complete by Completed Currently being utilized. 3/98 Total Workplan Tasks Not .. For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 20 i6(BOY) 0 4 Various delegation of authority tasks are behind due to delay in approval of m program. Section 1 -Page 4 Performance Objectives COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT a Communications(Division 310) Performance Objective 1997.98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year d Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 93% Agenda turnaround was delayed in November Turnaround Time 100%of time 1997 due to pending information from General Counsel. .� Board Minute Preparation 10 day 83% Minute's turnaround was delayed in Turnaround Time turnaround December and February due to two-week 100%of time vacation of Board Secretary and/or EA. Employee Satisfaction 3.0 score 2.7(based on to A 3.0 score indicates employees are receiving Rating(Communications Quarter Survey) the"right amount"of Information;less than Audit) this Indicates"too little"while greater than this indicates'too much" Communications programs implemented within the last two years will continue with attempts to re- emphasize management/line face-to-face communications. Photocopying Services 93%+ 96% Photocopying Services continues to receive m Satisfaction outstanding reviews from the customer base. Graphics Services 95%+ 98% Graphics Services continues to receive Satisfaction outstanding reviews from the customer base. Visitor Tour Satisfaction 85%+ 93% Our tour guide program incorporating other Rating District employees has met with success, especially as guides become more comfortable with their role. We continue to exceed the benchmark for satisfaction. w, Total Workplan Tasks Not e For FY 97.98 complete Behind Started Summary of Data 31 30(97%) 1 0 Records Management software implementation behind schedule. Section 1 - Page 5 1997-98 End-of-Year Report GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT GSA Admin., Collections, and Facilities Maintenance(Divisions 41014201430') Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Target Through Endof- Summary of Data Year e Ensure small line contract $0.25 per linear $0.27 Cost was slightly exceeded;however,this cleaning costs do not foot cost includes televising of 10%of lines exceed target cleaned,which was not incorporated in original benchmark. Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench time 85% Target met. Collections Facilities Maintenance Division d (pump station and line cleaning)meets or exceeds target c' Ensure that collections 95%+spots 92.4% Target slightly missed largely due to impact of _ trouble spots are cleaned on El Nino response during winter. maintained on schedule schedule Ensure wrench time for 700/6+wrench time 72% Target met. Fleet Maintenance Division meets or exceeds target Ensure plannedlprevenfive 75%Planned& 55%Preventive Research has indicated that all work going to maintenance to corrective Preventive 45%Corrective Re-build shop is classed as corrective maintenance ratios meets Maintenance maintenance. This was not anticipated during targets 25%Corrective development of original benchmark. Maintenance IIIIII Total Workplan Tasks Not For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 9 8 (89%) 1 0 One task behind related to review of member cities sewer infrestmcture. ry *Note that GSA Administration, Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined for reporting purposes. Section 1 -Page 6 Performance Objectives INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT End-User, Networking and Plant Automation (Divisions 4601470/490•) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year Maintain Computer Network 97%+ 98% Target was met. Dp-gme- Resolve Tier 2 help desk 80%+within 5 78% Target neatly met. Performance is an Q, calls days improvement over 1e and 2n°quarter results. Maintain an average work 100%or less 141% This performance is largely due to being short. backlog of no greater than staffed one position during a large portion of e 100%of staff time available the first hall of the year. Additionally,backlogs occurred unfit complete familiarity was gained with the new Help Desk software. This backlog,however,is an improvement over the 2n0 and 3' quarters. Ensure 80%productive 80%+ 65% New help desk software impacted this m time in Division 460 percentage. Improvement was made in the 41" quarter but overall performance was less than the benchmark. ,L Maintain Plant SCADA 99.5% 99.9% Target exceeded. Server"Up-time" Total Workplan Tasks Not For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 24 19(79%) 4 1 Projects largely delayed due to contractors.consultants,or q, expansion/change of work scope. 'Note that both Information Technology divisions and Plant Automation division have been combined for reporting ® purposes. Section 1 -Page 7 1997-98 End-of-Year Report HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT HR Admn. and Training (Divisions 5101520') Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year Number of Recruitment 46 days 54 This exceeded our benchmark due to the Days to hire exempt complex recruitment of a Senior Engineer positron with specialization in process automation. (private sector=46 days) As recruitments decline due to downsizing, this measurement becomes less valuable. Percentage of supervisor 25% 24% Supervisor Compensation ratio remains salaries to total does not below target and private sector standard. exceed 25% (private sector=25%) HR Department managed 90-100%of 92.4%expended Target met. '-' within budget budget through fiscal year Achieve 5-year staffing plan 549 FTE's by 531.5 FTE's through This is well below our endaf-year target projections year's end end of fiscal year and will continue to be managed to m achieved FY 98t99 and-of-year target of 521.5 FTE's. m 'Ensure all training classes 70% (3.5 on 5 See Summary of Data New Training Manager questioned existing are cumulatively rated scale) column methodology for data collection and will "above average" revise the approach for FY 95/99. Total Workplan Tasks Not �. For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 20' 15 (75%) 2 3 Cross-training programs delayed due to DART delays. Delay in Broadbanding implementation due to on-going negotiations. rz 'Note that Human Resources and Training Divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. r Section 1 -Page 8 Performance Objectives HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Safety& Emergency Response(Division 530) Performance Objective 1997.98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year ® Resolve Service Requests 90%of time 99% Customer Service remains a division within 3 work days priority. This also represents a significant improvement over last year's objective of a 75%/5 day turnaround target Ensure Injury Incidence is 7.6 incidence 8.1 The objective is below industry standards 45%below industry rate but above our internal benchmark. average Although Zd.3`°and 4'Quarter (Industry Average: 13.8) performance was very good,the and-of- year results are Impacted by higher than expected 1r'Quarter accidents. ® Lost Work Day Case 3.8 incidence 2.6 Target has been met and is significantly Incidence Rate 50%below rate lower than established benchmark. industry average (Industry Average:7.6) - Workers Compensation $403 $428 Although accident costs were above the Cost Factor 30%below internal target it remains below the industry d industry average average. The costs associated with claims - (Industry Average:$576) remains low. Staff work closely with the worker's compensation 3rd party administrator and the clinic to manage accident costs and return employees back to the job. Total Workplan Tasks Not .,, For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 0 0 0 0 Iva - Section 1 - Page 9 1997-98 End-of-Year Report TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Compliance and Monitoring(Division 620) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year Ensure compliance 5%or less non- 0% Target met;no non-compliance incidents. r requirements are effectively compliance Incidents communicated result from ECM failure to communicate. Meet Regulatory Deadlines 100%Deadlines 100%/100% All regulatory deadlines met. and complete associated 95%Milestones project milestones Distribute high priority 95%Within 2 day -95+% All high priority legislation distributed within legislation Information to turnaround targets. E-mail distribution has expedited appropriate staff process. Review biosolids 95%+of time 100% Target met. documentation within 5 days w Total Workplan Tasks Not For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 24 23(96%) 1 0 Researching cost/benefit of modifying Ocean Monitoring program delayed. m s .e Section 1 - Page 10 Performance Objectives TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Environmental Sciences Laboratory (Division 630) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year m Complete development of 4/98 Draft Report Stage 90%of Project milestones are complete. task-based performance Awaiting final benchmarking report. measures for laboratory Develop procedures for 6/98 Draft Report Stage Each section of lab has identified measures measuring laboratory of quality. Project approximately 90% quality;publish report by complete and waiting above benchmarking end of fiscal year report for finalization. m Maintain monthly sample 90%-110%of 100.8% Performance target met. Data represents analyses within'productive' target samples only eleven months of data as July data not range taken available during reporting period. b Cross-train analyst staff to 90%of staff 92% Mead of schedule- Target is to ensure that complete additional trained by end at minimum 3 analysts are cross-trained and r functions FY 97198 certified to perform one or more of the 65 laboratory analyses. Review laboratory in- 100% See Summary of Data Out-sourced laboratory costs have been .., sourcelout-source completion by column reduced to 73%of last years costs. opportunities and control 6198 out-sourced laboratory costs at 75%of FY 96197 costs Total Workplan Tasks Not For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data m 19 12 (63%) 5 2 Business plan preparation and LIMS integration with other District databases were delayed. Section 1 - Page 11 1997-98 End-of-Year Report TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT ® Source Control (Division 640) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year o Develop Technical 90%of Review Stage 90%of major project milestones completed; Assistance Center and milestones however,TAC scope has changed due to complete project-related completed GM's Office input and center has yet to be milestones placed on-line ® Maintain field inspection 2.5 monitoring 2.7 Inspection events met targeted goal. Note, productivity events/day however,that due to data collection methods data is for 10 and 2n0 and 34 quarter. Ensure Heavy Metals do not Not to exceed 671 Ibs./tlay Met targeted goal. Note, however,that due exceed 649-7461bsJday 746 IbsJday to data collection methods data is for lm and concentration limits 2n°and V quarter. Conduct enforcement 100%of fime 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal. actions within 30 days of non-compliance evert Issue industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal. permits prior to expiration ,e Total Workplan Tasks Not For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 15 15 (100%) 0 0 Workplan tasks completed. Note G Summary comments above related to Technical Assistance Center -- Section 1 -Page 12 Performance Objectives ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Engineering Planning & Design (Division 720) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance 'G Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year Return construction 80%+of time 84% Target met. submittals by identified due date Bid wristruc8on projects on 80%+of time 100% All jobs were advertised and bid on(revised) established Capital schedule. Improvement Program schedule .7 Meet design project 80%+of time 80% Target met. milestones Meet 90%of project Complete by 90% Based on revised Strategic Plan schedule, milestones for Strategic Plan 8198 most milestones have been met. Respond to environmental 100%of time 100% The District is typically allowed 3045 days to correspondence within 30 respond to inquiries. Our initial performance working days unless objective was 5-working days which was far requesting agency requires too aggressive. This has been revised more rapid response resulting in us meeting the target 100%of the time. Total Workplan Tasks Not For FY 97.98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 53 49 (92%) 4 0 Environmental Impact Report behind due to revised schedule. Internal re-engineermg m effort slightly behind schedule and waiting consultant input. Section 1 - Page 13 1997-98 End-of-Year Report ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Construction Management(Division 730) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Summary of Data Target Through End-of- Year d Target Change Order costs 5% 2.3% Change order costs are always based on at no greater than 5%of the preceding four quarters. Targets have original contract amount been met and are well last year's and-of- (industry Standard= year change orders of 4.04% m 7.25%) Achieve Beneficial 60%-within 90 67%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is always based on Occupancy in facilities days 33%-240 days the preceding four quarters.The target �+ within targets 40%-within 240 was met. days Conduct Quality Control 10%or less 10% Target has been met based on OC Inspections and average no inspections. more 10%conectable deficiencies Total Workplan Tasks Not For FY 97-98 complete Behind Started Summary of Data 6 4(67%) 1 1 Some internal re-engineering efforts of operational and administrative functions behind schedule. m Section 1 -Page 14 Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Administration (Division 810) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year d Ensure Operations $331/million $306/million gallons Performance objective met. treatment cost per million gallons treated treated gallons does not exceed target m Ensure Total Injury 12.2 10.0 Target met. Frequency Rate 25%or (or less) more below industry average Ensure Five-year staffing 220.25 FTEs by 221.5 FTEs End of year FTE's are slightly above target. plan figures are met end of year Some delays in plant automation limit our ability to right-size completely. Total Workplan Not Tasks Complete Behind Started Summary of Data For FY 97-98 36 31 (86%) 2 3 Tasks behind schedule generally include some operational re-engineering efforts. Section 1 -Page 15 1997-98 End-of-Year Report OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Processing Support(Divisions 8201870) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance m Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year Ensure utility,chemical, 90%-100% 95.9% On target. blosolids and oxygen within budget contracts are managed within budget Ensure Capital Outlay 80%+of time —80% Project milestones met. Revolving Fund(CORF) project milestones are met Respond to trouble- 80%+ 93.8% Through twelve months, response to such shooting and service requests has well exceeded the benchmark requests by established target. priority time frames *Maintain therms/kWh at .111 therme/kWit .113 therms/kWh- Within targeted parameters. Central Generation plants -Plant 1 Plant 1 " (kilowatt hour)within .108 therms/kWh .109 therms/kWh- targeted limits -Plant 2 Plant 'Maintain FERC efficiency 42%or greater 67% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit at Central Generation requirements thus gaining favorable natural plants within targeted limits gas transmission rates. Total Workplan Tasks Not G For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 58 35(60%) 1 22 Task behind relate to benchmarking and DART efforts as well as J-42 plant automation project. 'Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined for reporting purposes. Section 1 - Page 16 Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Plant Operations(Divisions 8301840) Performance Objective 1997-98 Target Performance Through End-of- Summary of Data Year ,y Achieve Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 73%>at Plant 1 76%Plant 1 Primary basins L and M were Removal Targets in Primary Treatment and Plant 2 67%Plant 2 taken out of service due to Process construction at Plant 2. This,in conjunction with wet weather flows lowered the Plant 2 TSS below targeted levels. Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 50%>at Plant 1 54%Plant 1 See above. (BOD)Removal Targets in Primary and Plant 2 42%Plant 2 Treatment Process Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 25%(1 hour 14.3% Plant 1 Overtime continues to be `Y total leave hours taken does not exceed overtime per 4 15%Plant 2 aggressively managed. As a targets hours leave taken) result,targets have been achieved. r, Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base 4%Plant 1 See above, does not exceed targets salary 4%Plant 2 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiii ilium- No Total Workplan Tasks Not For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 29 25(86%) 2 2 DART team formations and plant automation tasks behind schedule. Section 1 -Page 17 1997-98 End-of-Year Report OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT O&M Maintenance Divisions (Divisions 850/860) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Target Through End-of- Summary of Data Year Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47,5% 62% Continued tracking and refinement of Time in Mechanical productive time has improved accountability Maintenance Division and our wrench time component. Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 55% See above. Time in Electrical& Instrumentation Division Maintain appropriate 60%Preventive 57% Preventive preventive to corrective 40%Corrective 43% Corrective Near targeted benchmarks. maintenance ratios in the Mechanical Maintenance Division Maintain appropriate 60% Preventve 53% Preventive This process continues to be refined. preventive to corrective 40%Corrective 47%Corrective Additions to the low voltage equipment maintenance ratios in the database to accommodate preventive Electrical&Instrumentation maintenance tasks will improve this relic,in Division the future. Ensure 72.5%Productive 72.5% 72% Data indicates that field staff are spending Field Time in Mechanical approximately 3 of 4 hours field hours Maintenance Division conducting wrench work,job related travel s time or parts chasing,trouble-shooting, problem investigation,procedure development and database development and management. Performance target has been met. Ensure 72.5%Productive 72.5% 66% Refinements are still in progress. M Field Time in Electrical& Procedural improvements based on GEMS Instrumentation Division consulting report being examined and has helped improve performance at end of year. Total Workplan Tasks Not s, For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 38 32 (84%) 1 5 DART and J-42 activities delayed in some areas. Section 1 -Page 18 ® Performance Objectives OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Air Quality & Special Projects(Division 880) Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Through Target End-of-Year Summary of Data %Air Quality non- 0% 0% Performance objective is on target. m compliance issues due to failure to communicate to field Operations r Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 100% Performance objective is on target deadlines Complete approved 80%t projects 50%through twelve Projects b be completed fell behind m research projects including completed months schedule. Half were completed on time project planning.design and while other continue into fiscal year 98/99. field investigation e, Total Workplan Tasks Not For FY 97-98 Complete Behind Started Summary of Data 5 3(80%) 2 0 Two research projects behind schedule. Section 1 - Page 19 U u u u u u L U ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT , I (714) 962-2411 u mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue J Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 U J OCSD B13119B U b ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Information Only: i . Non Agenda Item <q .. September 9, 1998 ph.. (7141882-2411 Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership -1: m.1nm•do.: 3311 Michelson Drive Ra B.8127 FLurrceln Vt Irvine, CA 92612 lmy.cA y,92728-8127 _..u..t•amain Subject: Notice of Denial of Claim 10844 Bit Avenue Claim No.: 7-CSD-98-L-7 Date Received: July 22, 1998 Fc=o n WOW..M 82708-7018 Notice is hereby given that the Orange County Sanitation District, acting on its own behalf and as legal successor to County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, } Mamne. California, has taken the following action regarding the claim you presented to the + Agencies Orange County Sanitation District and County Sanitation District No. 7 or Orange • County, California, on July 22, 1998: That portion of the claim which seeks damages arising out of the alleged Brosimproper"assignment'of the 1990 Dedication Agreement, as described Rune in paragraphs 3(f), (g), (h), and 4(b)of the claim, has been denied by Power operation of law on September 8, 1998, wuorwn Svden G cr. WARNING: Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six months �Hwtlrt2etn etiw from the date this notice was personally delivered to you or deposited in P Irvine "Le Habra the mail, to file court action on this claim. (See, Government Code "'Las Alsm� rsection 945.6.) You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in ne rr Reath connection with this matter. If you desire to consult with an attorney, you 1sY!r arong. •'.;fs Placanda should do so Immediately. Santa ate Ste/Botch Your claim requested that notices concerning your claim be sent to the Board of mcAn Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District. The District assumes that this wits Pan: was an error, since you would otherwise receive no notice of the action taken with c".� v t undo-. regard to your claim. Thus, to ensure receipt by you, the original of this notice will be eou �Y ti d.to. mailed to the post office address listed in your claim, art: sanitary Districts 1 Ctete Mo. t ozak Weer aRr1eM Md"y My rinan nd Risk Manger -i imm Mph SK:lc Document3 Attachment: Proof of Service c: Board of Directors General Counsel Mark Kemple, Esq. T.Protect the Pvhee HeLhh and the rnvv .s,c through Eacenence,n Weaewsw sys[ems- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 4, 1998 byormadon Only: Crow Winthrop Development Limited Partnership Non Agenda Item 3311 Michelson Drive Irvine, CA 92612 (714)ss2-2°2411 Subject: Notice of Return of Claim Without Action Claim No.: 7-CSD-98-L-7 Date Received: July 22, 1998 P.Q Box 8127 F mein valley.ak 9272E-8127 Notice is hereby given that the Orange County Sanitation District, acting on its own behalf and as legal successor to County Sanitation District No. 7 of 10844 81is Avem,e ro,tnmin valley,ca Orange County, California, has taken the following action regarding the claim M708-7018 you presented to the Orange County Sanitation District and County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, on July 22, 1998: Member That portion of the claim which seeks damages arising out of the Aaaeeins District's alleged failure to provide Crow Winthrop Development • Limited Partnership with the consideration promised under the 1990 Me. Dedication Agreement, as described in paragraphs 3 (a), (b), (c), (d), Anaheim (a), and 4 (a) of the claim, is returned without action as untimely Brae pursuant to Government Code Sections 901 and 911.2 (See Dixon v. Buena Perk Lypradd City of Turlock, 219 Cal. App. 3d 907, 912 Fo nmm Valley rVlermn Barden Gera Your claim requested that notices concerning your claim be sent to the Board Hunongmn Beech Loin. of Directors of the County Sanitation District. The District assumes that this Le Habra was an error since you would otherwise receive no notice of the action taken le pelme Los ae,n:me with regard to your claim. Thus, to insure receipt by you, the original of this Newport Been notice will be mailed to the post office address listed in your claim. Q^enge plecenbe sea eeAet,°e, Steven Kozak Rennin Finance and Risk Manager radon wle perk _ By: Pores undo Penn M. Kyle, Board Secretary County of Orange N` Beni., Oletriasa Cadet We. /pk N dnW ray reepond&me 1998`uva.09NWAdo Water 01KFlats Attachments:Proof of Service Irvin pench Untimely Claim c: Board of Directors General Counsel Mark Kemple, Esq. 'To p wcc Me Public Health and me Envircwment r n dugh Excellence in Wasmwew Sysmms' STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District, to be held on . d3 , 19L�"was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on / IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this L day of Penny M. Kyl , Secrete Board of Dire ors Orange County Sanitation District HAW P.DTAIADMINIBSV0RMSV27A 9nS Impact of Permit User Rate Change Pe9e1d 13 Rd Pei1nS CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT N. Nu r Coamop,Name TOTAL TOTAL (DECREASE) CHANGE 1 1-1406 UNIRULE INDUSTRIES,INC. 358.58 430.84 Mw "Am 2 1.1403 PRECISION CIRCUITS WEST INC. 2M.54 M8.51 M.02 29.M% 3 1-1.009 B A S F CORPORATION I. M.08 1,2MA5 no.n 21LM96 4 1-1.011 MAAGARETISTEKTILESERVICE 14,141.n 1T.408.99 3.26T.M M.10% 6 M412 MONARCH PRECISION DEBURRING COMPANY 1.300.12 1.495.70 195.52 15.d% 6 1.1413 RBCTRANSPORTDYNAMICSCORP. OTLW 1.116.06 196.12 2102% 1 1-1-0 HIGH-TECH COATINGS 3M.49 42166 ".1T MAT% B 1-1-0 3 UNIVERSAL CIRCUITS INCORPORATED 4.4V.84 E764.2B 1.336.M M.05% 9 1-I-W4 BURROWS IND.OBA MINUTEMAN PUMPING 4,325.82 5,697.21 1,371.40 31.70% 10 1-1-0 EMBEE INC.a S.743.45 7.443.99 1,70.53 29.61% 11 1-1-0 EMBEE INC.M 2.526de 3.279.65 752.81 29.80% 12 1-1 9 EMBEE INC.31 3p61.76 4.011.74 949.% 31.0% 13 1-1-0 SOUTH COAST CIRCUITS.INC. 1.449.11 1.9MO5 456.54 31.53% 14 14401 ORANGE CONTMNER,INC. 2.274.81 2,934.56 659.74 29.00% 15 141 2 VICTORY CIRCUITS INC. 19018 2MAS 59.90 3L48% Ii 1-1A NEWPORT METAL FINISHING INC. 358.06 439.50 81A4 22.15% 17 141 ALLOY TECH ELECTROPOLISHING INC. LT2.32 2M.14 55,82 24.0% 18 144137 METAL TECHNOLOGY INC. 1.1M.55 I.4nM 315,64 26.1T% 19 1-1.O08 ALUMINUM PRECISION RIODLICTS INC. 1,458.20 1.874.M 415.26 21I.M16 M 14-(09 ENGINEERINGPLATINGCORPORATION 5937 22.95 13.58 M.M% M 1-1- CHICAGO LAUNDRY B DYE OO.INC. 3.061.34 3.675.43 618.09 M.22% 22 1-1-011 DATA SOLDER SERVICES SZW 66.46 13.50 25.49% M 1-1-0 L B N UNIFORM SUPPLY COMPANY,INC. - - - 34 1-14M M P STEEL INC DBA MST COAST COATINGS 354.64 438.32 a.M M.6014 25 1-1-0 SOUTH BAY CHROME SALESICHROME EFFECTS 1.31115 1.612.33 MAS 22.651` M 1-14115 SUPER CIRCUITS 506.24 M5.M 139.34 Z7.526 27 1-1.046 MARKLAND MANUFACTURING,INC. 2.14S.07 2737.31 592 27.61% 28 1.14NI7 HI-TECH STENCILS 11.91 14.M 2.53 21A3% M 1-14H8 CEDKO ELECTRONICS,INC. 70.0 1,01T.94 0.0016 M 1-1-019 LAM LIGHTING INC. 191.05 gnu 1T202 22.64% 31 1-14,50 VERTEO PROCESS SYSTEMS INC. 2.299A9 2.19MM 4631 21.32% 32 1-14151 CULLIGAI MMTER CONDRIONING 3,2M.51 4.069.10 61854 25,18% 33 1-1A52 CENTURYCIRDUITSERVICES 34219 421.66 79A7 23,n% % 141 PANELCONCEPTS,INC. 1,2M21 1.49&96 263.05 21,32% 35 1-1AI54 SOUTHCOASTCIRCUIT!IQ t1805 221A7 43.42 24.M% 36 1-1455 ANODYNE INC. 1,SM.95 2.002.77 40T.83 25.67% 37 1-1-056 SOLDER TECHNOLOGY - - - 38 14-0 SOLDER STATION ONE INC.-WEST - - - 39 1-1.056 SOLDER STATION ONE INC. EAST - - - 40 1-1-0 POTTER-ROEMER - - - 41 144W ALUMINUM PRECISION PRODUCTS.INC. 3,585.12 4.149.27 SM.14 15.74% a 1-1-115 ACTWE PLATING INC. 1,5P215 1.936.91 413.73 21.18% a 1-1-118 B A F INDUSTRIES 714.99 916.94 M1." mu% M 1-1-123 A B A DEBURRING AND TUMBLING INC. 245.33 299]8 54,46 2 m 46 1-41M ALMATRON ELECTRONICS.INC. 86T.01 1.109.88 242.81 28.0196 N 1-1438 AIPHANERCSINC. 4,M2.00 SAI1A2 1.369A2 30.83% a 144M ACCURATE CIRCUIT ENGINEERING 1.BM.9 Z43291 549.M "Am 48 14-139 CALIF COHSOUOATED WATER PURIFICATION 12,584.89 13.180.84 1,1M05 9A2% M 1-1-142 DATA ELECTRONICS SERVICE 2.983.17 3,981A1 098.M 33.M% 50 1-1-1M DANCOMETALSURFACING 1.287.28 1.814.n WAS 25.M% 61 1-1.166 ELECTROMATIC.INC. 53.W 85.16 12,12 22.54% 62 1-b HOUGHTON INTERNATIONAL.INC. 3M.91 WA4 11424 53 1441D IT T CANNON 19,308.70 24.883.83 5.575.14 21LM 54 1-1412 LERNER PROCESSING LAB 6.209.15 8.141.59 1930.M 31.14% 55 1-1-22T LAM-PLATE TECHNOLOGY 247.85 M3.33 55.49 M.M% M 1-1-M MICRO SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. 13,59T.72 17.586.93 3,96921 M.M% 57 1-1-2A GALLADE CHEMICAL INC. W.24 1.0213.93 17069 19.1196 SO 1-14 KI PLEION CORPOMTION R 97109 1.106.14 M0.05 M.05% 59 1-1-MZ PIONEERCIRCUTTS 3,6T3.n 5,W1.63 1.187.11 30.66% 60 1.1-2M POWER CIRCUITS,INC. 9.3M.61 11,69.03 2.594.36 27.89% 61 1-1-265 PRECIOUS METALS PLATING 502M 65194 1M0I) M.00% 62 1-14 L 8 N UNIFORM SUPPLY CO..INC. 11.310.59 13.906.W 2,5604 M.95% 63 1-1-MS REIDMETALFINISHING 847.34 1,078.85 231.32 213 % 94 1-1-2TT PRECISION POWOERCOATING IHC. SM.92 M.33 IU41 24AM IWPERMTTRATEIMPACTI.N4 SUMMARY(2) W23M Impact of Permit User Rate Change Page 2 of 13 D NO P ft CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT GYmGvI Nniag Company Name TOTAL TOTAL (OECREASEI CHANGE B6 1.1-270 CHROMA SYSTEMS PARTNERS 72,919D1 95,351,23 22,361.92 30.6496 N 1-1479 KSOLDERING,INC.DIM QUALITY SOLDERING M.31 323.61 59.30 22.43% 67 1-MN FAIRCHILD FASTENERSU"OSAR 3,143.0 3.912.86 %B.BO 24.0% M 1-1-283 MASK TECHNOLOGY INC. 1,812.44 2,INSI 4NAT 30AM M 1.1484 OLYMPIC COATINGS 212.77 201.81 4B.84 22.98% TO 1-1-286 SANTA AM PLATING 2,702M 3,482.02 T29.17 28.83% 71 1-1.2% SOLDER DYNAMICS T5.0! N." 22.63 29.7w 72 1-1-310 S P S TECHNOLOGIES 3,692.T9 4,584.22 071.48 27.04% 73 1-1-313 SOLDER TECHNOLOGY - - 74 1-1-330 CHERRY TEKTRON 6,824.48 7,501.70 I'MN 28.55% 76 1-1-081 V A L CIRCUITS 15 1,025.45 1,298.00 270.53 26.36% TB 1-1-354 WEBER NAMEPLATE 740.22 9151.43 211.20 28,63% A 1Q-W7 ALON LAUNDRY INS." 1.374.30 284.82 26.14% TB 1-2-0O6 GOGLANWI BAKERIES 12,O04.12 14,051.21 2.047.08 17.0 % 79 1.2-011 LEE R.COX(COIN LAUNDRY) 90.51 1,195.20 NT.00 20.14% Bo 1-2-012 SSE FOODS INC. 15,221A0 18,896.37 3,624.93 23.74% 01 13413 M D PHARMACEUTICAL,INC. 1,497.06 1,859.04 432.28 30.29% 62 14-014 LAUNDERW0R1.011 3,102.81 3,913.92 811.11 26.14% 83 1.2•U15 THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 4,M&N 5.406.79 1.228.69 2SN% 81 1-2.016 PACIFIC QUARTZ,INC. 3.076.0 3,392.45 313.80 10.19% 85 1- O17 MARK OPTICS INC. 371163 432.13 53.50 14.13% 86 1-2-018 UWMC HOSPITAL CORPORATION 38.312.N 48A79.88 8,187.84 2t32% h 1-2-019 RAPIDWASH 1,325.81 1,67240 345.58 26.14% 96 1-2-020 COIN DROP LAUNDRY 108.B2 1N.49 Z2.82 N.14% 69 1.2134 CASE SWAYNE,INC. 9,217.N 11.878.02 2,860.48 28.N% 90 1-2-139 EL METATE INC. 12,299.77 15,9N.96 3,05.21 NAM 91 14-156 EL TORO MEAT SHOP 29.941.OB 29,650.41 6,709.32 23.85% 92 1-T199 MUNOZ COIN LAUNDRY 983.32 1,240.37 257.06 26.14% 93 1.2426 SSE MANUFACTURING,INC. 7.595.23 9,395.87 1.799.64 23AM 94 1-2-240 LAUNDRYWORLDINC. NO.17 1.249,01 25B.B4 26.14% 95 1-2-258 NORTH BRISTOL PARTNERS 1,644.84 1,948.43 403.79 26,14% 98 1.2.278 RITO'S LAUNDRY WORLD - - - % 1J001 INDEPENDENT CATERING N M.02 1,118.59 198.56 21.32% 99 1.3-003 MOTELS 7.91 9,649.32 1,695.63 21.32% 99 15004 INDEPENDENT CATERING#1 11118.09 1,350.45 238.36 21SM 100 1d006 DEL TAC0 AN 732.63 808.81 158.19 21.32% 101 1-3.008 NORMS RESTAURANT 2.826.70 3A29.31 002.61 21.3M W2 1-34107 SOUTHWEST FOODS DIM CLAIM JUMPER N 2,07.10 3.514.73 617.02 21.3216 IN 1•3118 BLUE BIRD MOTEL 1,162.M 1.410.0 247.79 21.029 104 1-5-125 CALIFORNIA MOBILE HOME PARK 5,310.50 B."2AG 1.132.13 21.326 105 1-3155 EL CORTEZ LODGE 30N.91 3.681.01 647.00 21.3294 106 i-S-182 KOM KAI MOBILE HOME PARK 3.109.04 3,771.M NGN 21.3219 107 1-3.194 ORANGE TREE MOTEL 2,901.28 3.628.92 632.20 21.3214 100 1-3209 U S POSTAL SERVICE(SANTA AN REENWLLE 719.42 872.79 10.37 21.32% 10B 1-3212 U S POSTAL SERVICE(SANTA ANA-SO MAIN) 107.78 22T.81 40.03 21.X% 110 11214 U S POSTAL SERVICE(SANTA AR BUSH) WIN 842.80 146.OT 21.32% 111 I-MN TAGGINWAGONMOBILE/PARK 5,917.T3 2,179.31 1,261.611 21.32% T91411w Zane 431,317.33 541,101.72 109,540.O0 25.42% 112 b1407 ALL METAL PAINT STRIPPING 11.92 11.29 0.07 0.5M 113 2-1415 PACIFIC UTILITY PRODUCTS INC. 335.95 319.08 (18.") -4.99% 114 2-1416 SANTANA SERWCEB 213.95 199.89 (14.06) 41.5756 115 2-1-018 VEECO ELECTRO FAB INC. 204.00 205.15 1.15 0.56% 110 2-1422 DITTY DRUM COMPANY,INC. 266.85 267.27 0.62 0.23% 117 2.14N AERA ENERGY LLO 148,212]11 145.724.22 (480.54) 4,33% 118 b1428 ADOHR FARM LLC 32B,114.57 35$463.73 24,39SAS 7.43% 119 2-1429 MC P FOODS INC. 14l,572.26 183,949.04 22,374A8 16.81% 120 b1431 EKOELLO CIRCUITS MANUFACTURING CORP. 2.448.02 2,808.68 169.76 8.52% 121 2-1432 SM T DYNAMICS LLC 951.86 957.34 5.49 On% 122 2-1-033 R0TO6DIE COMPANY INC. 30.80 BO.N 1.04 I N% 123 2-1-035 SOUTH COAST WATER 1.74B.01 1.632.31 (115.T1) 4.62% 1N 2.1436 WALKER CUSTOM COATING 101.40 105.15 3.76 3.60% 125 2-1-041 IDEAL ARODWNG INC. 4,167.01 3.B39.74 (327.27) -7.65% 128 bt-GG CIROUITWORLD 352,15 301.30 19.15 5.29% IW PERMIT RATE IMPACTI A4 SUMMARY(2) Bn�B6 Impact of Permit User Rate Change Page 3of 13 RN PeN6 CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT N9m99L Namoor C..m,Ni,, TOTAL TOTAL INCREASE) CHANGE IV 2-1-0N ANAHEIM MILLS CORP. BB,072.03 69.691.72 1,61,69 1.B4% In 2-1445 SUNDOR BRANDS INC.A PROCTER B GAMBLE CO 172.131.17 197,429.20 25.368.12 14.74% 129 2-1 4 SPIVECO INC. 3,343.98 3.289.37 (M.N) -1.03% 1N 2-1447 KNOTTS BERRY FARM FOODS 100.370.16 113,819.25 13,449.08 13.40% 131 91-048 CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES.INC. 1,610A1 1,N9.ID 9.82 0.64% 1$ t1-09 FAVORITE FOODS INC. 194,219.32 212.3WAB 16,111.58 9.33% 133 2-1-0110 UNIWEB.INC. 1,92TA5 1.943.35 18.00 0.0% 1N 2-1.066 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. W3.40 N1.N (tA9) -0.N% 135 b1-061 MORAVEK BIOCHEMICALS INC. 471.02 512.17 41.14 8.73% 1N 2-1-ON CADILLAC PLATING 430.0 M0.35 2.32 0.0% In 2-14N CARTEL ELECTRONICS 015.28 030.41 15.14 1,86% 1N 2-14M SECHRIST INDUSTRIES,INC. 676]0 551.85 (14A3) -2A9% IN 2A-008 IMPERIAL CONTAINERS 6 DISPLAY INC. 353.49 WAS D.M) -2,16% 140 b1-1)67 ARTISTIC PL TING B METAL FINISHING INC. 1,NS.N 1,827.N (0.0) -0.N% 141 2-1489 HARTE-HANKS SHOPPERS 4,N7A6 4,1N.95 67.N 1.66% 142 2.1470 PACIFIC IMAGE COMPANY 236.0 RICH 1.33 0.57% 143 2-1473 CITY OF ANAHEIM-WATER SERVICES 20,719.21 1SA27.97 (2,291.24) -11Y6% 10 2-1474 POWDERCOAT SERVICES N 111.24 110.00 (0.56) 4.50% 1" 2.1-076 VILLA PARK ORCHARDS ASSOCIATION 7,2N.BT 7,098.82 (112.M) -1.55% 146 V-077 COPPER CLAD MULTLAYER PRODUCTS INC. 44N 79 4,620S9 157.50 3.52% 147 2.1478 MILBANK WEST INC. 775.35 778.32 2.95 0.35% 148 V479 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 7,284.66 7,618.15 303.47 SAM 140 b14N CEROMETINC. 1.129.93 1,168.N 28.45 2.0% 1N 2-1481 KAYNAR MFG.DIV.KAYNAR TECHNOLOGIES IW 16.950145 16,9M.15 (27.29) -0.15% 151 Z14V TECHPLATE ENGINEERING CO.INC. 29.28 29.46 0.12 0.63% 182 24.063 ESSEK GROUP INC. 918.47 924.10 7.63 0.M% 153 2-1.0N UOP 2.905.01 3,270.70 N2.16 12.45% 164 2-143S CALIFORNIA CHASSIS,INC. 3.01.40 3,314.13 222.73 Tw% 1N 2-1-067 U.S.FILTER T IONPURE INC. 4,50,11.11 4,673.05 108.74 2.38% 156 214)118 A 6 R POWDER COATING INC. 1NES 140.31 3.45 2.62% 1N L1-090 SUPERIOR PLATING 570.91 Non (10.52) -1.N% IN 2-1.092 ELECTRORACK PRODUCTS CO.INC. 1,N7.59 1,NB.P 26.N 2.6916 150 2-14N ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC. 1,218.13 I.M0.14 54.21 4.N% 160 2-1494 NOLLACOILCOMPANY 478.N 475.N (2A6) 4A9% 161 2-1-002 AMERIMAK BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. 838.21 812.75 (25.46) -3.04% 162 2-1-10 ACROBURR INC. 206.30 198.09 (7.01) 4.80% 163 2-1-105 AEROCHEMINC. 7.999.05 8,433.4E 434.44 643% 1N 2-1-111 ALLIED PACIFIC METAL STAMPING 2,019.03 2,099A0 80.38 3.98% 1N 2.1-114 AMER.COW.CHEROKEE WASHING INC. 05,006.42 81,784.62 (3,221.N) 4..70% 186 b1421 FINELINE CIRCUITS 3 TECHNOLOGY INC. L329.25 1,332.76 3.50 0.26% 167 2-1-123 TAYLOR-DUNN MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1,414.14 1,423.N 9.22 DES% 1N 2-14V M T S MICROELECTRONICS INC. NB]] 21211 3.88 1.78% IW i1-120 WHITLOCK PACKAGING CORP(TETRAHCOCA COLA 48.160.73 64,925.N 6,704.0 14.05% In b1-132 PENTADYNE6R7NTAFLEK INC. 2.886,41 2,612.33 O4.081 -2.78% 171 2-1-133 CIRTECH INC. 4,166,59 4.Mom 2M.50 6.34% 172 21-136 CYTEC FISERITE INC. -In 2-1-137 SERRANO WATER DISTRICT - - - 174 b1-138 FROZSUN,INC. 23.406,33 25,584.07 2.087,75 8.89% 175 21450 ANAHEIM PLATING&POLISHING INC. 1,268.93 1,378.16 10.21 0.80% In 2.1-152 ADVANCE TECH PLATING INC. 231.11 231.33 on 0.10% In b1453 MICROMETALS INC.02 1,814.45 1,846.93 31.46 1.73% In ZIAS8 ELECTRO METAL FINISHING CORPORATION 15776 158.75 1.00 0.63% In 21-165 SKW BIOSYSTEMS INC.-ANAHEIM CITRUS PROD 110.610.69 107.923.08 (2,687.61) -2.43% IN 2I-IN VEECO ELECTRO FAB INC.92 143.19 143.98 0.79 0.66% 1S1 b1-107 NLLTEC POWDER COATING 279.42 268.25 6.63 3.10% IN 2.1-168 ANAHEIM EK7RUSION CO.INC. 1,49536 1,403.75 (91.63) A.12% IN 21409 TAORMINA INDUSTRIES INC.N 1,366.10 1.350.80 (35.40) -2.55% IN 21-171 KENLEN SPECIALITIES INC. 255.47 258.98 1.49 0.52% IN 2.1-172 GEORGE A JONES.IMPERIAL WELL 412.48 413.01 1.43 0,35% IN 2-1473 PLEGEL OIL COMPANY(MIYOUA-SHAYODOM) - - IA 2-1474 EVEREST.A DIV.OF MIGHT UNEIW. 4.692.22 4,351M (40.88) -0.89% IN 21476 BALI OIL COMPANY 777.65 761.44 (18.10) 4.07% /N 2-1178 PIEGEL OIL COMPANY(SLATTNER-AHA) 321.90 323.97 2.07 016494 1N 2-1-179 SPECTRUM YARNS INC. 480.0 469.N (0.53) -0.11% W PERMIT RATE IMPACTI.NF SUMMARY(2) 9123196 Impact of Permit User Rate Change Page 40f 13 4 RM PNM9 CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT 4 L1918J[ NuOAeT DOm,any NPme TOTAL TOTAL (DECREASE) CCU 191 2-1-181 NUEVO ENERGY COMPANY 9Z47 93.85 058 083% 192 2-1465 HIGHTOYAER PLATING INC. 931.95 880.42 (43.53) 4.67% 193 2.1-186 AGUMUUI COATINGS CORPORATION W4.79 I'M.04 82.28 6.2T% 194 2-1-187 RIGIFLEKTECHNOLOGYINC. 486.16 481.60 15.44 3.31% 10 2.1-168 VSCMANUFACTURINGINC. 2.B67,21 2.906.ST W36 1.37% IN 2-1-189 CENTRAL POWDER COATING 183.M 199.02 W" 8.41% 197 2-1-191 RM ELECTRONICS INC. 40465 42861 24.22 59816 IN 2-1-192 AROSERVICE 239.73 23910 (0.64) -0.2T% 199 2-1-193 DOVATRON MANUFACTURING W.CAL INS 66 1,960.62 1297 0.72% 200 2-1-194 MCKESSON WATER PRODUCTS CO.02 - - - 201 2.1-197 SOEING-ANMEIM 566.54 569.64 3.10 0.55% 202 2.1-199 CLASSIC PLATING INC. 415.30 415.84 0.54 0.13% 203 2-14101 BURUNGTON ENGINEERING INC. I.1WI8 1.071.25 (33.13) 4.00% 204 2I1 TRANSUNETECHNOLOGYINC. 87.21 87,58 0,37 0.43% 205 2-13 AERA ENERGY LUCa INA5 107.53 0,66 0.0% 206 bI-204 BUSHPOUSHINGANDCHROME 176.68 1".79 IN 0.62% 20T W-213 BLACK OIUDE INDUSTRIES INC. 2.87641 2.742.02 (134I8) 4.67% 203 b1-2M BRISTOL INDUSTRIES 3.999.46 4.0W.94 51.48 1.29% 209 D1-288 O L P LAWNATES A OMSION OF MP INC. - - - 210 2.1-2M DETAILS INC.83 200.65 20192 1.2T Om 211 2-1-233 EVEREW ELECTRONICS 02 - - 212 b1-2a4 GRANT PISTON RINGS DIV,OF FROM - - - 213 2-1-236 FOAMEK LP. - - - 214 2-1-237 UNITEDCUSTOIBPOUSHINGBPLATING - - - 215 2-1-260 P C A METAL FINISHING.INC. 6.271.25 6.T0267 431,42 6.W% 216 2-1461 CIRCUIT CENTER 4077 4Z67 IN 4AM 217 2.1.28T CIRCUIT CONNECTION 2985.W 3.114.0 128.61 4.34% 218 ZI- S MMOCK PACKAGING CORP(MAINKOCA COLA 90,4p8.59 IN.S30.99 10.422. 0 11.W% 219 2-1-289 CRESTCOAMNGINC. 1.863.59 2.053.97 W41 CM 220 2-14NIO CONIINUOUSCOATINGCORPORATION 4605.78 4.553.11 (62.87) -114% =1 2-1485 CUWGO WATER CONDITIONING OF O.C.INC. 1.097 75 1.W3.ST (24,18) -1M 222 DI- CUSTOMERAMELERSINC. W.75 659.14 6.38 0.90% 223 2-I-305 DELRU COMPANY 493.74 52T.36 33.52 6.81% 2S4 Z1.115 DETAILS,INC. 19,70 A0 W.530.61 825.51 4.19% 225 2-141N DUNHAN METAL PROCESSING 1.25035 1.M51 (33.W) 4.6996 226 2-14136 ELECTRON PLATING III INC. 1.nI.32 1.683.02 (58.30) 4.39% w 2-1407 ELECTRONIC PRECISION SPECIALTIES INC. 3.928.83 3.856.71 (7212) -1.84% 225 2-102 ENGELMARD WEST INC. 1.410.64 1.419,% 9AS 0.65% M 2.1443 ENGRAVERS INKCO 75.00 73.96 (1.91) 2Sm 230 2.1a KONICA OUALTTY PHOTO WEST.INC. 2.66011 2.733.01 am 3.10% 231 ZI-355 JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY INC. 3.764.69 3.781.91 (178) -0.0T% 232 2I1 GLOVFALATEK02 133.18 134.33 1.15 0.96% 233 2-14181 K%R W CORPORATION VIED." ZM74 14219 5.W% M 2-14HI5 IDfsAL UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE 19.101.5T 18.69268 (40UM 214% 285 2-14198 IMPERML PLATING 264.05 2505/ (1248) b11% 236 2-1499 INIEC PRODUCTS INC. 55T8.02 5.W4]8 (571.06) -10.281L 28T 2IAQI INDEPENDENT FORGE 40.00 4T517 (12821 -283% 23B 2.1.405 INTEACEM CORPORATION 5.TT4.54 6.175.T8 401.46 6.85% 2W 2.1.408 1TRCN INC. 150.31 1611.37 am 5.35% 240 2.1410 J K L MANUFACTURING INC.02 154.45 1W.83 11.38 TIT% 241 21412 JONATHAN MANUFACTURING CORP. 2.437.00 28T4.1B 137.18 5.63% 242 b1419 JB H DEBURRING 3,288.15 3.OTII.18 GIZ97) -SAM 243 Z1.424 WNSSURSKY BROTHERS SUPPLY INC. 475.12 41109 5.15 168% 244 2.1.425 KIMBERLYLLMK WORL DE.INC. 4M.88T.51 410.134.99 (17.66252) 4.6014 245 2-14M NIR"U.RUBBER COMPANY(NORTH) 5,TF1.29 S.B0568 W." QEM 246 2-1427 H.KOCH 8 SONS COMPANY 548.20 551I7 3.16 0.58% 247 2-1428 MnER CORPOMTION 748.90 75Z97 4.17 0.M% 248 21t430 ""ETCORP.A9 KBDECKERCO. 20.339.61 20.365.80 25.99 0.13% 249 2-14M LEACH INTERNATIONAL 95T.24 854.88 (Z36) -0.2T% 250 2-1438 LEARONAL INC. 1.171.95 1,298.41 INN 10.79% 251 2-1445 MCCURDYCIRCUITS81 VWAB 4.841.02 60.55 12M 252 2I1 MARCEL ELECTRONICS INT. 7.594.72 7,078.91 384A9 5.06% 253 2-1449 MCCURDY CIRCUITS 02 3.757.05 3.782.01 24.15 064% 254 2-1J61 MPSPNOTOGRAPNICSERVICES,INC. 1.190.32 1.232.12 41.80 3.61% M PERMIT RATE IMPACTI.MF SUMMARY(2) ° 798 Impact of Permit User Rate Change Pape 50( 13 RN Palma CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT NumOer Numear CamOem No TOM TOTAL (DECREAM CHANGE 255 2-1466 BRIGHT ARMOR PLATING 1.001.55 1.026.33 (18R2) -1.74% 256 2-14" WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY II.SMAIS 11,7e6.M 190.03 1' 2 2" 2-1476 MONITOR PLATING 6 ANODIZING 3.596.13 SN0.51 (55.76) 258 2-14n MULTLFINEl3NE ELECTRONI%INC. 6.101M 7.90254 (190.2T) -2.45% 259 2-1i00 MURRIETTA CIRCUITS 813.77 819.16 039 0.05% MD 2-1-501 NEUTRONICP TING SERVCES MM e6369 DM 0,21% Ml b1-505 NVAUJECNEMICKCOMPAHY 977.31 91265 (4B9) 1.50% 262 2-1420 OMNI METAL FINISHING.INC. 350511 3,419.72 (W.", -2A6% 263 21130 ORANGE COUNTY METAL PROCESSING 12.M.91 11.800.60 (762.31) SW% M6 b12 OfUNGECOUNTYPLATINGCO..INC. 1.369.30 1.317.M 7.72 0.56% 266 b1-559 PRO-TECH S,N1.01 5.637.46 M.N 5.55% 2" 2.1-602 PICOFARAD INC. 010.71 700.W (13.72) -1.106 MT 2-1-506 PLATEOORP No.INC. 2,94312 3.012.07 0J5 1.65% 2N 2-1-569 POWDERCOAT SERVICES INC.M 30.15 Set At 125 01M 269 b1-572 POWDERCOAT MRVMES INC.01 M3.M M110 9.72 2.24% 2T0 2.1473 FOANERCOATSERVICESINC.02 186.00 ISSAS 0.08 0.05% 2H 2.1575 PRECISION ANODIZING AND PLATING INC, 23,N069 21.21T30 (6.2M.39) -9.19% 212 b157e PRECISIONPNNTING New 513.39 4.37 0M% 223 2-1281 PRECON INC. 603.62 BM.10 M-N 3.01116 224 241596 DUALITY ALUMINUM FORGE N2.S2 WAS &W 0,63% 225 2.1407 O L P LAMINATES 02.A OV.OF AMP INC. - - - 228 b1105 ROBERT CMO 6.74 a'" 0.03 0,51% 272 2-1113 S 6 S POUSHING 6I ATING 9.633.09 9.196.06 (839.03) 1.50% 210 2-1119 SFPP.LP. 102.10 107.02 5.21 510% 270 2.11M SEAGATE SUBSTRATES W,OF SEA MTECH. N.BT2.05 W.2NS? I,2B2.63 6.59% 260 2-1137 SELECT CIRCUITS 157.41 163M 5.59 3.55% 281 3-1,415.1 WEIDMANN WATER CONDITIONERS.INC. 2,51M.75 2A911.26 (95.50) -3.0% 2S2 ?1156 STEINER CORPORATION DM AMER.UNEN SUPPL M.BM.53 22.351.N 1.671.41 9.0% 283 b1139 MCNESSON WATER PRODUCTS CO DRA SPARNLETT 7,N224 8.087.M 155.48 186% 284 2n1N STATER CORPORATION 4,665.1115 5,100.20) 434.25 9.31% 205 b1122 STAINLESS MICRO-POUSH INC. 1,475A7 1AM.49 ("A"') -3.18% 2B6 b11h STRIP CLEM2 COMPANY 162.54 1M.46 1.92 l.N% MT Z1176 STEPAN COMPANY 50,731.39 N.6M.M S.882S2 11.55% 2611 2.1101 SUNCUPSEINC. 1.2M.60 12M.W MAT 187% 289 b11N STEVENS MET&FINISHING,INC. 2,672.26 2,399.29 (72.95) -2.95% 290 YI10T GENERALCERAMICSINC. 1.468.56 1.180.68 Ism) 4AM 291 2.1197 TRISTAR ENGINEERED PRODUCTS.INC. 1.167.95 1.250.46 ME, 7.06% 292 2.1402 UNITED CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY INC. 811.99 9M.51 48.52 5.56% 293 ?1-703 ULTRA PURE METAL FINISHING.INC. 2.WT.8.1 1.9M.31 (6.62) 1.M% 2N 2-1-706 UNNERSALALLOYCORP 2813.22 2.6e2.72 26.M 013% 29S 2-1-7Ie WEBER MRCRAFT.INC. 4.2NS3 4.03.72 (all) -10% 296 2-1-715 WORLD CITRUS WEST - - - 29T 2-1-720 WASTEWATEROISPOSALCOMPANY 41.321601 41,W.48 112.47 0.27% MB 2-1435 WNONICS.INC. 8.72016 6.BN.59 125.81 1.87% MB ZZON MROWHEADPURITASWATERS 6,68183 6.543M (IM.61) -20M Me 2-2-007 ANAHEIM Wi WASH Im." See" 512 0.S 301 3-2 AN HEIM HILLS AUTO BODY M.39 237.86 RAT O6M 302 2- 013 BEACON BAY AUTO WASH - - 303 2-MUS BRIDGFORDFOODSCORPOMTION 2,486.32 2640.66 11.S5 050% 304 2-2 I? ANAHEIM CON UUNDRY 1.514A9 1,015.50 31.0 1.96% 306 241 4 B B G COINOP UUNDRY 1,109.26 1.122.16 22.M 1 f16% 306 2-31M CDUUMBINEASOCIATES 61,51 111.M O.N 0.55% DW 2-2Oel CONIEMPOCOINLAUNURY 611.42 MAT 11.76 1.9M 308 2-MS4 ANGELICA TEXTILE 46.895.58 47.00.71 760.13 18M M9 2-215T C FORMA STATE UNIVERSITY AT FULLERTON 12,327.19 12.991.M TY.N 0.55% 310 2-2155 DISNEYIAND INC.CO ENV.AFFAIRS DEPT. 389,12519 393,MV0 4,258.58 1.09% 311 2. e l ANANEIM MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 29.617.58 M.M586 WAIT 0.0% 312 b2102 MARTIN LUTHER HOSPITAL 17,99986 17,610." 111.06 0.83% 313 b2066 ST.JUDE HOSPITAL 30380A1 30,4M.59 192.18 0.0% 314 2.2-067 ST.JOSEPH HOSPITAL M.015.24 ".307.M 292.04 Q. 3 315 2-2.080 UCI MEDICAL CENTER 51,587.0 51,895.1$ WAN 0.63% 316 2- 1 NELCO PRODUCTS,INC. 9.TMBT 9.763.N 69.31 0.61% 317 2-24NB TAORMINAINDUSTRIESINC.00 ' 310 2-24M HEALTH CANE APPAREL SERVICES 6.711.59 4.927.34 215.79 0.66% W PERMIT RATE IMPACT1.tle SUMMARY(2) 9CC996 Impact of Permit User Rate Change Page 6of 13 4 Re P.4 CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT NO COm0en9 Nerve Tin (DECREASEI CHANGE 319 2-2.087 EXPRESS OIIANGE,INC. ].638.0] 1.222.59 (415.47) -5.44% 3" 2-2088 TAC WEST.INC. MAC 2wn 1.79 0.0% 111 2-2.00 OLNE OIL CO 50.97 5118 0.31 0oa% ]Sl 2-24)116 ANAHEIM TRUCK DEPOT X2 BIN WASH 2.276AS 2413.40 1M.52 6001A ]23 2- 126 CLEAN CITY LAUNDRIES IN ORANGE 477.24 486.56 134 1.98% 324 2-2-169 LAUNDROIMT 1,091.03 1.091.41 Mn 1.88% 325 2-2-183 KEMS CAR WASH INC.UOe HI-TECH CAR WASH 92946 05.03 5,10 CAM NO 2-2-IM LACEY CUSTOM LINENS 525.54 543a 17.52 3.33% an 2-2-IW ORANGE RESOURCE RECOVERY SYSTEMS MST 234.54 1.28 0.55% me 2-2-IN Y K K(U.SA)INC. 1.792.44 1.602.95 10.52 CAM No 2-2-213 SCISOREK B SON FLAVORS.INC. 147.57 13113 (IC") -9.T9% 330 2- 214 SM BIOSYSTEMS-BREA 35172 353.74 202 0.57% MI 2-2-219 BREACONMUNITYMO.SPRAL 5,084.41 5.096.5E 3214 0.63% SM 24-221 BASSAM H.SALAMEH(LAUNDROMAT) 59816 610.28 Mn 1.116% 300 24-222 WEST AMERICAN RUBBER COMPANY INC. 3B79.20 31M.94 2174 CAM m 2-2-E3 CITY OF ANAHEIM-PU&1L IIIILrtlES DEPT. 33180 3VIA3 1.83 CAM ]JS 2-2-224 FAETH LAUNDRY BDRY CLEANERS.INC. 427.22 43423 Too, IAAI% 336 2-2-M MEDTROMC INC. 11,103.30 11.455.6E MZ45 3AT% 3W 2-2-227 UNOCAL CORPORATION ISAMU 15.984.83 89.31 am% 338 2-2-M U.W.M.C.HOSPITAL CORPORATION 7.451.M 7,499.10 47.29 0.0% We 24-230 CON AGRA INC.DBA GILROY FOODS 13.139.11 13,557.16 42105 321% 340 2-2-"1 KT LN1NgtpAAT 1.75)70 1.784.97 M.27 IAM 3a1 2-2-232 D 6 D LAUNDRYMAT SM." 999.49 19.06 1.94% 342 2-2-M HIGHLANDER LAUNDROMAT DUL15 834.86 15.71 IAA U3 2-2-M BCP SYSTEMS WAS 5943 0.37 003% 344 2-2-238 GRWASH GANERIG-ANAHEIM LLL 207.09 208.32 1.2] 0.59% ]45 2-2-237 LAUNDROIAAT 109.77 193.48 3.71 IAA. 346 2-2-238 N-H COIN LAUNDRY - - - 347 2-2-AS CHILDREMS HpSPDAL OF ORANGECOUNtt - - - me 2-2-240 SOUDICOASTWATER - - - US 2-2-259 CHAPMAN GENERAL HOSPITAL 3.41MA4 3.520.35 2220 CAM 350 2-2-VO FULLERTON FOODS-OSCAR MAYEN FOODS CORP 4.441.00 4.468.76 UT6 CAM 351 2-2-M SOFT WATER WASH 1.83T.OT 1.6"M MAG 1.M% 352 2-2419 SUNCUPSE.INC.(CORRUGATOH PLANT) 13.BB6.W 13.724.3E (14114) -ICM 353 2-2-W0 SVGTHERMCOSYSTEMSWC. 2.461.07 2.476.48 1541 CAM 354 2-2a67 GRANDE TORTILLA INC. 28.679.29 a0,001.% 1.323.66 4AM 355 2-2 O HAMILTON MATERIALS 3.2M.20 3.2,14.83 166] CAM 356 2-2-M HINCKLEYANDSCHMITT 1.158.21 1,16240 25.28 2.27% 357 2-2-M GUNTHER ATHLETIC SERVICE 1.18107 1.195.73 1386 1.16% 35B 2-24U LA PALMA INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL 11,482.7J IlA5661 MAN 0.0% 358 2-b565 PLACEMIA LING COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 6.7W.11 6809.66 55.5E CAM, 360 2-2E54 SIWXHgNEYA55OCUTION COOP 10.672.50 12331.93 1.659.43 ISAM 361 2Q4KO S.B.THOMAS INC. 69924 703.67 L.M 0.0% 382 2-2d694 DON MIGUEL MOOCAN FOODS INC. MAKIN 36184.99 2,086.07 5.68% 363 2-2-731 SHERWIN D.YOEUN 51.48 54.79 0.30 0.58% 364 2-2-735 WRAY FAMILY TRUST(YORBA LING COINOP) 914AB 93ZU 1790 1.90% 365 2J001 WDO HOTELS INC. 86.10292 e60aan 54647 063% 365 2-3003 FRITZ TIUTS TOO 1.29136 1.300.57 920 O.6T% MIT 2-3003 DENNYSRESTAURANT91508 2.830.90 2848.77 17.97 0.0% 368 2-3006 SAXER'S SWORE MM 1,428.01 1,437.0 a." 0.0% 368 2 007 MCDONAID'S OF ANAHEIM 850.4E 959.48 6.03 OAM 3T0 23008 AIAND MOTOR LODGE 3.951.87 3.976.0 25.09 0.83% 371 b3O11 ANAHEIMCONVENlIONCENTER 15.591.19 16.690.12 80.8E 0.83% 372 2-34112 PLANTATION RESTAURAM - - 373 2-3013 TRYMLODGE INTERNATIONAL INN 4.9.16.79 4.888.09 31.33 0.0% 374 2J ANNIEIMROYALINC 7,95624 a,008.84 SO.SU 0.63% 375 2J 4 ANAHEIM STADIUM C/O DISNEY SPORTS ENT. 201570.06 26751.30 181.32 O.W% 376 2J MCDONALIYS OF PLACENTIA 721.39 725.87 ASS O.6T% 377 23031 BEST WESTERN PAWUONS 7,258.77 7,30414 46.07 0.0% 376 23 B O J DEVELOPMENT CO. SwA2 669.75 AM 0.0% no 23 DENNYSINC.4154 1.763.00 1,774.19 11.19 0.0% 380 23-0X OENNYS RESTAURANT 81205CN OEHNY5INC. 1.406AI 1.417.04 a." O.W% 381 2J05 DENNY$RESTAURAM HX CAD DENNTS INC. 1AVAO 1,593AS 10.0E O.6T% SM 2- 9 W.D.FROUT CO. 814AS WILTS 5.17 CAM, NVPERMITRATEIMPACT1.Me SUMMARY(2) 1 9123/98 Impact of Permit User Rate Change Page 7 of 13 Re( Pm h CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT gb, 89m6v[ Canaan.NO, TOTAL TOTAL (DECRFASEI CHANGE 383 2-3.040 BUENA VISTA CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 4,338)6 4,984.29 27S2 0.63% 384 2- 11 ANAHEIM A PENNY INN 31107.9e 3,127J1 19.73 0.63% 395 23M2 ST.EDNA SUBACUTE AND REHAB CENTER 5.726.68 5,76202 38.34 0.63% SM 23050 CANDY CANE MOTEL R496,52 BSS6.80 60.27 OX3% 357 2.1051 CITY CENTER MOTEL 1,071172 1,OA.51 6.80 0.83% SBB 2-3.102 ANAHEIM MOTEL 1,3011 1,317.05 8.31 0,63% 389 2-3.107 BANDERA ESTATES 3,999.49 4,024.87 25.38 063% 390 2-M12 ANAHEIM MOTEL LTO-RAMADA INN 10.883.44 10.952,51 MCI, 0.63% 391 2311E CINEDOME THEATRES 40540 4BB48 3.08 0.63% 392 23117 COUNTY INVESTMENTS I 836.36 841.67 5.31 0.63% 393 2- 118 COUNTY INVESTMENTS II 649.14 053.26 4,12 0.0% 3" 2-3.110 AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SO CAL(ANAHEIM) 14779.79 1791.09 11.30 &6.1% 395 2-3.125 EMERALD ISLE MOBILEHOME PARK 7,403,20 7,450.19 "AS 063% 396 ?3126 BONNIE VA BERG 743S2 740.54 4.72 0.63% 397 2-3.130 BEST WESTERN ANAHEIM INN 5.214.44 5.247.53 33.09 0.63% 398 2-5-138 COVENTRY COURT HEALTH CENTER 10,585.94 10,663.19 67.25 0.63% 399 2-3-143 GROVE INVESTMENT CO. 6,153.70 6.192.76 3000 0.63% 400 2.3.148 GARDEN PARK CARE CENTER 4.568.40 4,597.39 28.99 0.0% 401 2.3.152 EASTOWN CENTER 1.874.0 1,885.08 11,89 D.63% 402 2-3-154 INN AT THE PARK 24,358.51 24.513.41 154.80 DA3% 403 2.3.157 GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCH 12,5N]7 12,514.32 79.55 0.63% 4" 2-3.160 FRONTIER MOTEL 1.485.51 1,490.94 9.43 0.63% 405 2-3-166 STOVALL'S INN 19.723.24 19.646.42 126.16 0.53% 406 2-3.171 JAMESALIBERI0 610.88 816.02 6.15 0.63% 407 2-3.170 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS $,014.80 5046.63 3163 0.63% 408 2-3-179 MAGIC LAMP MOTEL - - - 409 2-3.187 LA.FITNESS ANAHEIM INC. 4.861.58 4.892.43 WAS 0.63% 410 2d192 PACIFIC HAVEN CONVALESCENT HOME 2.427.75 2,M316 15,41 0.0% 411 23195 QUALITYINN 15.923.64 18.024.70 101.06 0.63% 412 23199 RIVIERA MOTEL 1,240.91 1.248.79 Too 0.63% 413 2-3.201 U S POSTAL SERVICE(FULUCOMMONWEALTH) 401.73 404.28 2.0 0.63% 414 2-3.203 U S POSTAL SERVICE(PLACENTIA) 497.38 500.54 3,16 063% 415 2-3.204 U S POSTAL SERVICE(ANAHEIM-LOARA) 214AS 215.54 1.36 0.63% 416 2-3.211 PALM LODGE MOBILE HOME ESTATES 9,512.48 2.572.85 60.37 0.63% 417 2-3-212 PENNY SLEEPER INN - - - 418 2-1223 ZABY RIP VAN WINKLE 1,M6.27 1,55669 9.81 0,63% 419 2-3.233 U S POSTAL SERVICE(FULL-CHAPBMN) - - - 420 23234 U S POSTAL SERVICE(ANAHEIM-W BALL) 517.93 521.21 329 0,63% 421 2-3.235 U S POSTAL SERVICE(YORBA LINDA) 795.79 BOOM 5.05 0.63% 422 23240 SAMOA MOTEL 1,986.42 1,90.03 12.61 0,63% 423 23241 STRAUB DISTRIBUTING COMPANY LTD. 6.9E 6.99 0.04 0.63% 424 23247 SIR RUDIMAR MOTEL oMI.24 5.375.14 33.90 0.63% 425 23252 STATE COLLEGE MEDICAL CENTER(SM.B) 327.42 329.0 2.OB 0.63% 426 23256 SUN MAR NURSING CENTER 2.675.01 2.691.90 16." 0.63% 427 2326D TOYS R US 733,49 738.1E 4,88 0.83% 428 23261 TROPICANAMOTEL 2,445.21 9,505.16 59.95 0.0% 429 2328E UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 6.855,19 6.BB8.70 43.61 0.63% 430 23303 VALLOWiCK ROYAL COMPANY 8,881.7E 8,938.12 56.37 0.63% 431 23308 ZABY'S MOTOR LODGE 4.247.49 4.274.45 26.96 0.63% Tc,wlb Zone 3,885,364.41 3,990.911.12 125,546.71 3.25% 432 11410 SAM HOUSTON CO. 1.0"L57 1,BBB16 (10.39) -0,55% 433 3.1411 MEAD PACKAGING 1,417.89 1,3n,43 (M146) 0.14% 4M 3.1442 TAYCO ENGINEERING,INC. 3,180.13 3.5112.25 314.12 9.85% 435 3-1-013 AIR INDUSTRIES CORPORATION 7.548.32 8,839.37 1.283.06 17.13% 438 3-1-017 EXQUISITE DESIGNS 91.90 75.63 (16.27) -17.70% 437 3-1-019 TRIPLE A CONTAINERS INC. 4.87OA2 4,543.54 (327.09) 4.72% 438 3.1-021 CATALINA CYLINDERS A DIVISION OF ALUM 2.359,28 2,024.23 (332.04) -14,09% 439 3.1-023 RAYTHEON SYSTEMS COMPANY 4,647.17 4,28421 (362.05) -Z61% "a 3.14 13 K C A ELECTRONICS INC. 13.799.54 12,078.70 (1.72014) -12.47% 441 11.027 IPC CAL FLEX INC. 880.36 66227 (16.10) -2.06% 442 11-029 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY(BAKERY) 27.506.86 30,29.83 2.720.97 9.09% M3 }1.031 LUCKY STORES INC.(MILK PLANT) 102.607.01 110.372.94 7,785.93 7.57% dM 3-1432 LUCKY STORES(ICE CREAM PLANTUDIV OF 36,347.84 41,311.29 2,983.4E 7.73% 0 PERMIT RATE IMPACTI,As SUMMARY(2) Mmfl Impact of Permit User Rate Change Page 80f 13 RM PBrm3 CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT Numbe[ Numaar Cwnwm N.m TTO L TOM MECREASEI CHANGE MS 3.1433 SABA TEXTILE$INC. 7824273 ]2,01].54 (3.325.19) 4.56% 446 11404 SHEPARD BROTHERS INC. 13,72.51 16.063.61 2231.10 16.98% M MAMS WINONICS(OREM M.2M.04 17.04,35 (2,M.69) -01.56% N6 }1406 PRIMATE%INDUSTRIES OF CA INC 5.752.17 5,131.116 (Mel) -1079% 449 3.1-012 GENERAL CONTAINER CORPORATION BM.26 71543 21.16 3.05% 460 3-140 GOOOMN COMPANY 9.372.57 10,tl6J9 I.Ml1 1t06% 451 3.1-015 ANACOMP INC. 105." IO&M (1.ZB) -1.20% 452 3-1449 LOCI GRAPHICS.INC. M1.M 437.17 (NAI) -5.29% 453 3.1.050 CLEUGWS RHUBARB COMPANY 22.5M.92 23.915.11 1,400.19 621% 45`1 Y1452 B I TECHNOLOCRES.INC. 4.548.30 3.951.16 (597.23) -13.13% 455 311-0M MAGNETIC METALS CORPORATION 1.563.60 1,488.W (%,TO) 4.19% 4% 3.1-058 A S G ELECTROPOUSH 367.80 328.24 (3964) -10.77% 457 1i457 AMERIPEC INC. 37,90.15 43,617.02 5.569" 14.6811, 455 114050 STAR PAINTING AND POWDERCOATING 103.51 90.M (1260) -12AM 459 3.1-059 ARNOLD CIRCUITS.INC.91 ]SO4.4] 9.=.09 (289.SN 4.5916 450 3-1-000 CARGILL INC. 11.912.83 12.257J1 281.63 2.M 461 11-061 P T C INDUSTRIES,INC. In.M 175.32 (1.66) 4.19% 02 3.1.062 DERM COSMETICS LAB'S INC. 44.52 42.N (t18) 4.m 463 3-1-063 UNITED YARNS COMPANY.INC. 13.24147 11.839.10 0.402]2) -10.59% 4M 11-065 JOHNA THOMAS M,403.08 49.563,90 5.160.83 11.82% 465 31-080 UNIFIRSTCORP. 3.551.89 3.419.63 (M.08) 4.80% 468 3.1-088 KU A TEXTILES INC. 19.577.09 13.741.16 (835.03) 4.2T% 467 3.1-090 VOGEL PETERSON FURNITURE COMPANY 2,619.79 2.151.95 132AS 5.M% 468 3.1470 COOPER AND BRAIN INC. 8.71 6." (027) -3.14% M9 11N1 LASON 304.58 295.03 (SASS) .3.14% 470 3-1-022 HOUSE FOODS ALIERICA CORPORATION 25,01211 V.34269 2.329.98 822% 01 }14 ALLOY ME CASTING 1,692.76 1,6394? (",N) 4A1% 4T2 114175 VAN TAW FOOD PRODUCTS.INC. - - - 4M 11N6 B.EAEROSPACEWEMACOMSION 379.93 370.30 (968) -295% 474 3.1-0T2 ARNOLD CIRCUITS,INC.43 614.80 531.2T (83,53) -13.59% 475 3.1-08 AWANTAGEENWRONIAENTALSERMCESCO.INC 8.0] 7.68 (035) 4.38% 4" 3.1.028 KEY CIRCUIT CO. 1,9M.51 1.BW.13 (S1J9) -2.M% 4W 11-081 HOLUMSEAD IM INC. 1,169.M 1,1329] (36 a) -3.14% 4M 11-002 CORNINGOCACORP. 1.11092 1,OM.09 (NM) -3,14% 4" 3-1-083 DEAN FOODS COMPANY OF CNJFORNM INC.31 - - - 480 Y1-0N TREND OFFSET PRINTING SERVICES INC. 7253.M 7.025.M (227.N) .3.14% Mt 3-1-055 DEAN FOODS COMPANY OF CALFORNIA INC.02 - 402 3-1486 SPMECO.INC. - - - 483 3-1-103 AIR INDUSTRIES 16.302.25 15.293]3 (1.008.53) -0.19% 414 51-110 ALL METALS PROCESSING OF O.C.INC. 3.187,18 2760.SS (42BA2) 43A9% 485 3.1-113 AQUA{ON 751.25 Men (105.73) -14.08% 486 3.1.120 ALUIIUWERM HEAT TREATING CO. 1.37045 1.188.18 (1M28) -13.45% 487 11-137 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS CORP.#DELAWARE CORP 6.503.62 5.T0273 (71589) -1100% 488 YI-1M BECKMAR COULTER 7.499.0 72M.78 G!"M) -3.53% 459 11-152 CANNON EQUIPMENT WEST INC. 1.561.12 1.390A0 (170.73) 90.94% 490 3n-187 COASTLINE METAL FINISHING CORP. 3.421.0 2,81529 (6111 -1).]1% 481 1lA71 CROCKETT CONTAINER CORP. 795d3 N9.10 (24.93) -3.14% 492 3.1-175 DELPHI DMSION GMC 2,880.26 21882AS (w'u) 4.05% 493 51-186 PURE�CHEM PRODUCTS COMPANY INC. 394.44 368.76 (737) -1.87% 4% 3.1-= GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION 19.B16.M 2288410 3,16535 ISAM 495 &1405 IUNSOKLORAN COMPANY INC. 523.81 M29 928 1.77% 496 3.1436 HYATT OIE CASTING B ENGINEERING CORP. 1.11 N 1.51378 71,82 4.98% w 11451 CENTURY LAMINATORS INC. 6.240.62 5.4%,21 (734A1) -12.57% 498 51460 LA HABRA PLATING 642.51 525.42 (117.11) -13.23% MI 3-14M ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER,LOS M.MNTOS 19.643.60 16.090A0 (2,8,S119) -14.6016 SOD }14M LUCAS AEROSPACE CARGO SYSIEMSBREA 3.059.54 4.133.91 2T4.37 7.11% 501 &1.328 NAVAL VIEAPONS STATION SEAL BEACH CD 043 - - 502 }1305 PEPS4COLA BOTTLING COMPANY 193,936.10 216.136.95 22200.85 1145% 50.1 11411 SCIENTIFIC SPRAY FINISHES.INC. 88387 MO.M (43.70) 4.95% 501 3.1415 PILBINGTON AEROSPACE INC. 42.368.02 38.035.15 (4.730.87) -11.06% 505 11422 EXPO DYEING AND FINISHING INC 2],45223 25,871.08 Q,581.15) 426% 508 3.1430 SEVEN-0P BOTTLING COMPANY 74A8837 66.016.50 11.528.13 15AM w 3-1435 UNFINITY MICROELECTRONICS INC. 13,7M.65 11.RSW (2.454J5) -17.01% 6M 3-1441 SOLDERMASK,INC. SM 17 522.95 (22.22) 4.90% NBPERYT RATE IMPACTI.W SUMMARY(2) 9123198 Impact of Permit User Rate Change Page 9 of 13 Rd PMmA CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT Hooter N..E Comwnv Name TOTAL TOTAL IDECREASEI CHANGE 509 3-1-351 SUPER SOLDER SERVICES 1M.GS 125.09 (20.82) -%orl, 510 11-377 W ILAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC. 17,03752 15.962.26 (1,075,N) E.2194 511 31-590 U.S.DYEING O FINISHING INC. 177.0E.22 164.254.42 (12.650.80) -725% 512 12-002d LUCKYSTORES(BAKERY) 107.112.53 119,495.68 12AW.15 11.M% 513 12-B04 ALSERTSONS INC. 1,892A9 1.059.40 (8249) -3.14% 514 12410 ANAHEIM GENERAL HOSPITAL 9,278.52 8,061.E (Moos) -3,14% 515 12-015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.8M29 2.74657 (BBS2) 4.14% SIB 5-2416 WEST ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 22.517.65 21.869.69 (707,97) J.14% 517 3-2-017 WHESSOE VAREC INC. 1.SM.02 1.241AS (146.M) -10.6219 519 12-018 ARCOPETROLEUMPRODUCTSCOMPANY 43139 417.57 (1382) -3 0m 519 3.2-031 BEACH-LINCARWJSH 1,1EM 973.37 (2150) 48AM 5" 3,MS4 WILLWA CHANG 1,234.62 1,13B.58 (E.") -7.N% 521 12459 DE LE JON ENTERPRISES 1,09.75 1,417A8 fmw) -7.94% 522 12-060 GERAROTILE 11,31731 1902.04 0.015.28) -B.m 523 12-061 VENCOR INC DBA VENCOR HOSP-DRANGE COUNTY 973.61 943.011 (E.R) -3.14% 524 12-073 LAUNDRALAND 62885 586.28 (E.M) -7.94% 525 124185 SUNCUPSE INC.IDEA CORRU KRAFT II 14.734.66 14.93221 1W.M 1.54% 526 3-3-089 LAUNDERLAND 1.015.U4 9M.43 (EGGS) -7.94% 527 12464 DES INC.DBA GBS LINENS - - - 528 3-24395 CYPRESS CAR WASH 971.E 7E.37 (176.M) -13.16% 529 12-096 GONG PHUONG TOFU 911.27 7WAS (Im") -1962% 530 12-111 BOSS LAUNDRONATS.INC. 763.32 721.M (fit. ") -7.89% 531 12.113 COIN LAUNDRY CIO FRANZ UEM 1.96S.25 I,BM.E (1N.M) -7.94% 532 12-124 GARDNER LITHOGRAPH.INC. 401.87 371.15 (E.TJ) -0.65% 533 12-133 PACIFICA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 5.743,41 5.50.32 (1E.10) -3.14% SM 12-141 LAUNDSRI-AND O C/O WALTER WELCH 1,2M.53 1.109.81 (95.73) -7.N% 535 3.2-153 LAUNDERLAND(C.HOPKINS) 77641 714.76 (61.M) -0.94% IN 1b156 BUENA PARK SELFSERYE CAR WASH 259.60 207.73 (St S6) -16.9896 537 12-157 VALETCARWASM MS.M No" (148.40) -17.5614 538 12-15$ COIN DP LAUNDRY 917.E 844.E (72.87) -7.14% 539 12-159 U WASH N DRY 1.07.74 1,13948 (N.28) -7.94% SQ 11169 LAUNDEM.AND CGI LAUNDRY M8.0 70,01 (NEE) -7.94% Mt 3.2-174 CHAT ROJANAC0IN-0P LAUNDRY 016,65 MT87 (48.E) -7.94% 542 12-175 NUTRILITE PRODUCTS,INC 9.M7.23 6.63774 (MB.49) -7.3^ 543 11101 ODONNELLOILCOMPANY 122.E E.42 (24.57) Sao 12-189 THE WASHROOM 1.04E 943.24 (81.36) -7.94% MS 12-193 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO..INC. 2.746.12 2.438.32 (E7.E) -11,21% 546 12-2W RALPHS GROCERY CO,ADS 1,E9.93 1,811.E (IS I d.N% 547 12-2M S 8 C OIL CORPORATION I19 M 95.E (23.04) -19.911% MB 12-2M BEACHWARNIER GAR WASH 587.78 JET.37 (100.41) ATM% 549 32-229 COLUMBIA HUNTINGTON BEACH HOSPITAL 9,504.36 9,2116.33 (2E.M) -3.14% No 3.2.234 ULTRA WSIEEL COL4PANY 6.126.61 5.430.29 (693 U) -11.32% 551 12-235 TOWN B COUNTRY LMINDROMAT 05.03 78,23 (STS) -7.94% 552 12.236 SRINDLERHOMAS - - - 553 12-237 INDUSTRIAL DEIONIZED WATER SUPPLY - - - 554 12-282 SUENA PARK COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 3.E0.08 S,3GS.S2 (10.75) -3.1494 555 12-ZM LOS AUMITOS ECONO-WASH 166J2 153.11 (13.21) -TN% 556 12.265 LOS ALAMITOS GENERAL HOSPITAL 17.229.E 16.6119611 (5E.28) 43.14% 557 12-277 METRO CAR WASH 782,25 651136 (IM.6% -16.09% 558 12425 THEWATER MAN 1,8,16.57 1A9542 (]51.15) -19.02% 559 12-MB TR0.HOK/R.T.P. 1.5611.46 1N1.45 (10.01) .8AM SGS 12-M4 VALLEYWEWSHOPPIN(ICENTER 839.37 813.05 DoU) 4.14% Sol S-2-355 VICTORIA LAUNOMWAT 09AA 568.39 (S0.75) -7.94% MR 134M1 KNOTTS BERRY FARMS 107.213,65 103,551.76 (3.361.811) 4.14% 563 13-0M MCDONALD'S 761.E 737.21 (23.M) .3.14% 564 13684 II N-DUT BURGER BN.M n9.31 (25.23) 41.14% 565 13-006 DON JOSE 87 2.5611.14 2.487AI (M.0) 4.14% N6 3.3-008 EL TORITO RESTAURANT 2.570.36 2.4119.70 HIS 4.14% 567 13-010 BEST WESTERNP INTENNATIOWL INN 6j16.10 5.536118 (179.24) 4,14% SM 13411 FULLERTON~EHOUSE C/O LUCKY STORES INC 1,7ST" 1,702A (0.11) 4.14% 569 13-012 COCOS8127 1,9M.M 1,92042 (6T17) -3.14% 570 13-013 MARIE CALLENDER PIE SHOP MI 1,10.E 1.145.93 (37.10) d.14% 571 11914 ROD FRASER ENT.,INC.DBA WIN JOSE 15 TMLU 1.721.17 (55.72) 4.14% 572 13015 LCD ENTERPRISES 1,4M.04 1.3GS.N (44.05) 4.14% IW PERMIT RATE IMPACTt S SUM10ARY(2) W23P38 Impact of Permit User Rate Change Page 10 of 13 r RBI Penns CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT NY Numem CBmmn9 Neme TOTAL TOTAL IOECREASE) CHANGE 573 3 016 NORM'S RESTAURANT 21295.75 2R23.77 (71,90) -3.14% 674 13-017 BRINKER INTERNATIONAL OBA CHUB 1.37085 1,027.87 (42.99) 4.14% 575 Y3-0M RUBY INN MOTEL 2,OM 65 2.019.48 (65.37) -3.14% 576 13020 INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES 9912 761.85 737.97 (23.89) -3.14% 577 5M21 CYPRESS PARK COMMUNITY CHURCH 375,M 363.79 (11.70) -3.14% 578 3.3-024 V'TESTMINSTERCOLONYPLAZA 4,OB3.69 3.965.33 (128.37) -3.14% 579 34-025 RUSSEMINVESTMENTS 3,331.03 3,228.50 (104.45) 4G4% SM 5"X SEVERLYMANORWESTMINSTER 6,103.30 5.911.92 (191.36) -3.14% Mt YMV SIMLER 1392 1.296.24 1.20.53 (40.71) -3.14% 6B2 3.1028 KIM SU SEAFOOD RESTAURANT,INC. - - - SU 3.S<30 WESTERN STATES INDUSTRIAL 718.02 596.50 (=51) 4.14% SM 3 l TRICOTRADINGCOANC. 3,745.70 3.626.24 (117.45) 4.14% Sea Y3032 FARQUHAR INVESTMENT GROUP 1.394.29 1,350.54 (4172) 4.14% BM 34033 THE ORIGINAL FISH CO. 2,70.0 2.599.08 (87.37) 4.14% M7 YMM ANAHEIM HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC STE 81250 10,6M.76 10,252.84 (331.90) 4.14% US YMW STAGE-STOPMOTEL 1,453.19 1,417.31 (ISM) -3.14% SBB 3-5-037 EXTENDED CARE HOSPITAL OF WESTMINSTER 4,254.44 4.121.03 (13141) 4.14% SM 3.3.103 ANAHEIM TERRACE CARE CENTER 4.553.26 4.410.50 (142.78) -3.14% 591 11105 ANAHEIM SHORES MOBILE HOME ESTATES 20,176.53 19.64386 MUST) -3.14% 592 3.3.112 BEATRICEIHUNT-WESSON ADMINISTRATION 17,620.80 17.068.27 (MM) -3.14% 50 3- .125 ECONO LODGE 2.183.20 2.114.74 ("a) -3A4% 6M 3-3-128 GARDEN GROVE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 5,1H.54 7,BMA5 (255.39) 4.14% SB5 Y1129 THE GROVE MOTEL 2,019.87 11956.53 (63.54) -3.14% S98 3-S-140 CORONADO SQUARE 1,014.38 282.0 (31,81) -3.14% $97 3.3.190 GRANDOENTER 1,37309 1.329.07 (0.02) .3,14% 598 3.3.190 SALLY'S TOTAL FITNESS 8.440.09 81183.18 (2M.91) 4.14% 599 3.3200 HOUSE OF IMPORTS 3.953.78 3,442.34 (In") 4.14% 600 3.3.213 U S POSTAL SERVICE(FOUNTAIN VALLEY) 148,26 143.61 (4.86) 4.14% 601 Z3214 U S POSTAL SERVICE(LA HABRA) Y .26 M.M (7.35) -3.14% 02 3.1215 U S POSTAL SERVICE(WESTMINSTER) 229.93 222.72 (721) 4.14% M3 y3219 U S POSTAL SERVICE(SI 455.05 "2.50 (14,33) 4.14% SM 11240 MADRID MOTEL 980.85 882.91 (27.93) 4.14% MS 3.3.283 LOSAIAMITOSRACECOURSE 37,466.76 34,291.92 (1.174.0,11) 4.14% MB 11293 PEPPERTREE PLAZA 980.75 950.00 (30.7E) 4.14% 07 3-S-286 RANCH MOTEL 511.26 425R3 (law) 4.14% MB 3.34M ROBIN HOOD MOTEL 1,58324 1,514.22 (49.02) 4.14% M9 134116 7.11 MOTEL 6 R.V.PARK 2.M2.63 2,249.80 (MU) 4.14% 610 3 324 SILVER MOON MOTEL (SUM 0201) 1.658.57 1,000,58 (5101) 4.14% 84 3 U SUMMERWOOD CENTRE MB MC Th9m98 Yip 1,620.91 1,670.08 (60.83) -3,14% 612 3- O WESTED 270.41 281.93 (SAS) -3.14% 613 3. 360 WESTERN SKIES MOMLEHOME PARK 2,891.45 2.80029 (90.67) -3.14% TBYI1m2mN 1,738,M5.14 1,761,225.00 22,679.94 1.30% 814 12.002 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 2,276.32 3,288.33 13.01 0.67% 615 54-100 ALBERTSON'S MARKET NASA 448.85 451A2 2.57 0.57% BID 5-2-112 BEACCN BAY ENTERPRISES(CAR WASH) 1,07365 898.28 (1n.M) -18.5214 617 52-169 NEWPORT SHORES COIN-OP LAUNDROMAT 394.62 371.91 (22.70) -5.7594 815 56061 WAREHOUSE RESTAURANT 1.623.13 1.832A1 9.26 0.5796 619 S1DW EL TORITO GRILL 0=7 2,437.84 2,451.78 13.04 0.97% 620 S44M D.P.'SPUBGRILL 1.665.87 1.675.19 9,52 0.57% 621 54-0M RUSTY PELICAN RESTAURANT.INC. 2,062.26 2,074.05 11.70 0.57% an 53408 MODYS WHARF 699.0', 703.04 4.00 0.57% US 54009 WESTERN CARRIERS.INC. 1,699.48 1,708.19 9.72 O.ST% 624 5.1010 OLD SPAGHETTI FACTORY 1.873.87 1,SM.58 10.71 0.57% US 51011 RISTORANTE MAMMA GINA 838.17 8,12.05 4.79 0.57% 626 55105 BALBOA PAVILION 1,021.04 I'm.M am 0.57% 627 S1107 BIG CANYON COUNTRY CLUB 5.124.68 5,153.95 20.30 ON% no 55113 CAUFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 619.71 M.25 3.541 0.57% we 53-120 DE ANIA SAYSIDE VILLAGE.LLC 25.313.08 25.457.79 144.71 0.57% on 53.144 NEWPORT AUTO CENTER 1.330.75 1,338.36 7.81 0."% Mt 50-152 LIDO MARINA VILLAGE 7.241.65 7.203.26 41.40 0.67% 632 51160 NEWPORT BEACH MARRIOTT HOTEL 30,817.69 30,993.88 178.10 0.57% 633 5 163 NEWPORT BEACH INN 113.00 111M On 0.57% 634 S 184 NEAPORT CENTER MEDICAL SLOG 01 IOU PERMIT RATE IMPACTI.HB SUMMARY(2) Impact of Permit User Rate Change Page11 of 13 Rd PenoS CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT NunBW ComoaW Na1ne TOTAL TD IDECREASEI CHANGE ME 5J165 NEVJPORT CENTER MEDICAL SLOG R 2.4 .45 2.M8.37 13.92 0.57% 636 5 166 NEPNORT CENTER MEDICAL SLOG b 1.52%82 1,53e.57 6.75 0.52% 07 S 167 NEVIPORT MINES PARTNERSHIP 9.77IM 9.826.92 55.M 0.57% 638 6 168 NENPORT HARBOR YACHT CLUB 1.Tn.57 1.T87.73 10.16 OS7% 639 5. 160 NENPORT CENTER MEDICAL BLDG.M zloSIS 2.118.20 12.M DST% 64M 51170 NE RTER HOTEL CORPORATION 5,816.22 SON)47 3325 DST% Told fW Zane 112,110.00 112.54246 432.46 0.39% 641 6.1.002 CRTIEf6ONMACHINEINORKS 408.02 MIS 02.37 20 9 9M 5-1-003 GULTONSTATHAM TRANSDUCERS INC. 1.328.10 1,M22] 314.13 Z3.65% 8M 6.1-0M I C N PINRMACEURCAS INC. O80B.05 4,90297 1.OMA2 2825% SM 11-1-0OS AWEDMGNAL ADVANCED SUBSTMTES - - - 6M 5-1403 CL %%L CO.M.OF GRISNOLD IND. 2,174A1 ;720.71 646.30 2SAM BM S-1-110 WEST NEWPORT OIL COMPANY 43.728.78 SILMO5 ls.w727 M438% M7 61A15 NI%SON METAL FINISHING 4.196.19 S.IM.29 1,ZJ1.10 29.32% eM 6,1-125 RAYTHEON SYSTEMS COMPANY 3.4 W 4,233.98 801.96 2337% M9 8-1-129 ALllEO51GNAL 5UB5TMTE TECHNOLOGY 16.T00.eT zLM.06 5,805.36 33.58% 650 6-1-135 EATON CORPORATION 26n" 3INA6 4T28T IT.82% 651 S1-138 RVLkUUERS,INC. 9361 116.75 23.14 SI.T 652 0.1-1" V ECIRCUITS INC. 7.114SS 9.149.49 2034.M 28.60% 653 &2-001 FNRVIEWSTATEHOSPRAL 27,961M M.753.02 7,192.00 28.OB% 654 6-2-002 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY NEINS CORPORATION 1.453.11 1.78267 339.56 23.37% 05 62-0M HDAG MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL M.V2M 41,M77I 7,n507 23.37% 655 6-2-005 FASHION FAIR M9.M 693.77 150.418 27.7016 657 6-2-109 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 354M 47025 116.14 32.79% 658 6.2-142 I T T JABSCO PRODUCTS 61286 756-07 14321 23.37% 659 5- In LAOUINTAMOTORINN 6.6M" SM.M 1,56020 23.37% 660 B Ml NEVgORT COSTA MESA YMCA 2358.92 2910.01 551.Z0 29.37% "I 6 = ORANGE COUNTY FAR 6 EXPO CENTER 5,684.52 TAMES 1,32B.M 2137% SIM 6-3-2M WESTCUFF BUILDING 1,243.98 1.534.65 290.69 23.37% TodtWZaM 165,428.86 212.110,15 46.681.27 2822% 663 MAIN PLAN NOW CORPORATION 2.083.29 1.221.08 (861.21) JIIM B84 7-1-007 L N P ENGINEERING PLASTICS INC. 715.51 456.60 (25B.91) -XAM 655 7-1-0(B RICOH ELECTRONICS R 11.1114.79 7,272.53 (3,912.25) -M.98% BBB 7-1-009 JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION(U.S.) 1.020.So 1,28994 (SJ0.86) -nAm BIT 7-1-011 RICOH ELECTRONICS INC. 2393.48 1.4M.12 (909.36) -37.94% SEE 7-1-013 CITY OF TUSTIN WATER SERVICE - -In 7-1418 WESCO SERNCES SB.53 M.M Cu.19) 4925% 670 7-1-0211 ALLTEK CIRCUIT INC. 1.176.79 M.01 (496.65) 4214% 671 7-1424 IATIMES 4212239 37.116.61 (5,005.77) 672 7-1424 MARUCHAN.INC. 31,4n.31 28,023.59 (3.453.62) -IBM 673 7-1408 SUPERIOR PROCESSING 80.24 51.49 CM.75) -35.83% 674 7-14 REVERE TRANSDUCERS.INC. 1,247.M MISS (36324) -29.16% 675 7-1-032 DERLAN INC. 6,172418 4,1M.79 (2A45.69) - 1.14% 6T6 7-1-031 ALPHA METALS INC. 2,331.09 1.3,18.71 (48237) -M.69% SW 741 IRMNESEMSORSCORP, t01.M 0.51 (M.54) -37.04% 678 7-1-03.5 ALUMINUM FORGE-M.OF ALUM.PRECISION 2101.12 1,35251 (748.61) 4SZ3% 109 7-1-0B6 FLIUUBLE METAL HOSE YANUFACTUIIING CO. 611.B1 346.W (264.M) 4IM 680 7-14AT AVIATION EMIIPMURNT STRUCTURES.INC. 432.49 293,78 (138.71) -nom "I 7-1-038 NENPORT CORPORATION 2580.94 1.737.31 (MIM) 42.59% 6B2 7-1-039 PRINTRONIX INC. 1,9YI.71 1.367.44 (570.27) -29.43% 6M 7-1-0 VANTEC.LLC 9327 WAS (27.22) -".IS% W4 MANI MATRIX CIRCUITS.INC. 2356.B8 1,769A2 (557.47) 414.83% INS 7-1.043 XZXEIECTRONICS 5052 30.M (20AS) AOAM INS 7-1.O6 MEDTROMC INC.HEART VANE DMSIDN I MA1 2,15963 (888.77) 49.18% IND 7-14HS S0MMINA CORPORATION 5.M.47 3MI41 Moix.16) -x;, L SEE 7-1L7 UNION INCORPORATED 1,458.07 1,01LOD (425.37) -"An, 61M 7-1448 CERADYNE INC. - - - M 7-1-M9 ALYN CORPORATNNN _ - - M1 7-1-116 ASTECH MANUFACTURING INC. 7,095.67 3,785.04 (3.3(I0.63) �.Sn, 692 7-1-126 CAL-TROMCS CIRCWTS INC. 987.77 599.01 (388.76) -39.36% 893 7-1-139 CIRCUTTTECH 284.05 170M (113.70) �10.03% 9NPERMR M1E IMPACTI.IM SUMMARY(2) W23198 Impact of Permit User Rate Change Pape 12 o113 RM Pmmtl CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT N!ITaI sl CMa9Am Noma TOTAL TOTAL IOECRfASEI CHANGE 6N 7-1-110 ROCRWELL SEMICONDUCTOR SYSTEMS 2e3.559.09 1N,OW.O (117,511.01) 48.25% See 7-1-141 CHEER ENGINEERING O STAMPING MW26 1W.11 (132.15) 40.01% 696 7-1-1,W COSMOTRONIC COMPANY CORP. 7.766.94 S,61B.95 (Zl17.99) -27.2T% 697 7-1-158 DYE TECHNIQUE INC. 9.611W 6,274.02 (3,09.1T) -M.73% SW 7-1-162 ELECTROLURGY INC. 11.91342 6.714.51 (5.1W.91j 4061% on 7-1-172 GEMINI INDUSTRIES INC. 18,60.18 12.85120 (5}W.N) 30.91% TW 7-1-176 PACWkR"UGHES INTERCONNECT SYSTEMS 12.108.19 6.621.59 (6.687.0) �06.21% "1 7-1-176 I C N BIOMEDICALS.INC. N9)5 191.10 (70.65) 4!9AS% 702 7-1415 MCAS EL TOROA ENVIRONMENT IAU 225.139.W 156,09.50 168,9W.W) -30.51% 703 7-1420 MCGAW.INC. 0.125.31 0.326.95 (W.00.36) 415.52% 701 7-1-221 TROY SYSTEMS INC. 1W21 3,11211 (16282) -N.16% TO 7-1-NS PRUDENIWL OVERALL SUPPLY 12.99T.N 10,285.72 (2.711.51) -20.88% TO Zl-NO ROYALTY CAIPET MILLS INC. 88.891.67 0,676.% (25215.11) -28.37% ]0] 7-1-211 RMSER ELECTROPRECISION 712.29 103.69 (328.60) iWIA7% TOO 1-1-250 STEEUWIE INC. 26.981A0 15.410.26 (11.571.11) 418911 TO 7-1-257 MORTON INTERNATIONAL,INC. 2.150.95 1,263.12 (80.0) � ,:M% 710 7-1-2M CITYOFTUSTIN,WATERSERVICE E*19.30 2.7110." (2,669.0) -18.90% Tll 7-1-275 VOLENTECINTERNATIONU CORPORATION 6.895.22 1,92T.66 (3,9117.55) 41.00% 712 7-1-2T9 SEMICOA 1,316.00 M21 (15538) 41.0% 713 7-2-W2 SORIN BIOMEDICAL,INC. - - - 711 7-2-0 SUNSET ENVIRONMENTA.INC.91 60.0 129.98 (I78.95) -20.16% 715 7-2 IAUNDERIANO 1.017.81 6N.05 (3]3.7]) -1B.]2% 716 T-24D06 SUNSET ENVIRONMENTAL.INC.a 877.00 610.72 (M-28) -30.36% 717 7-24W CERADYNE INC. - - 718 T-ZWB AFRO ENTERP1115E5INC.,DBA HILLVIEW CLFA 207.W 131.76 (TS.W) -96.3T% 719 7-24)09 TUSTINHOSPITALANDMEDICALCENTER - - - TN 7-2-10 BARTER HEALTHCARE CORP..EDWMDS ON. 12.81211 e.105.51 (4.208.58) 4335% 721 7-2-110 BRISTOL COIN LAUNDRY 2.421.71 1,5N.31 RNK)43) 43610% M 7-2-121 CRAZY SHIRTS INC. 1,N8.71 955.51 (3W.0) -29.16% TN 7-2-132 ECONOV A 1.373.07 60J11 (BW23) -3022% 724 7-D170 LOVELL INDUSTRIES.INC. 1.695.68 1.073.11 (mn) -36.7^ 725 7-2-217 O C B REPROGRAPHICS I.M,09 1.21T.W (514.79) -n'] 726 7-2MS TOODSENTERPRISES 7,00.16 S.IN.0 0105.e9) -18.26% TIT 74-20 RAYNE WATER SYSTEMS 1A32.70 708.02 (681.66) I7.7996 728 78001 BELNR MOTOR HOTEL 1A81.15 Tests, (tl2T1) 429.16% 729 7-3U01 STUART ANDERSONS BUCK ANGUS RESTAURANT 3.352.23 2,37I.311 (or 35) -29.16% TW 7-3 BEMI~RESTAUNW 3.678.26 2.80.0 (1,OY2.11) -29.16% 731 T-}IM CAREHOUSE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 9,092a7 S.YJ2.81 (2.359.2]) 732 7S165 I C METERS PROPERTIES 2.195.92 1.555.69 (61023) 49.1616 733 7-3.IT2 MARRIOTT CORPo TOW(SWINE) 29.151.16 W852.0T (11A99.11) 429.16% TN 7J236 THEVIESTINSOUTHCOASTPLAZA NATE 42 17269A1 (7,10.(2) -nAS% 735 7-b259 U S POSTAL SERVICE( USTI%IST ST) 415.97 291.69 (121m) -"AS% 736 73282 UNNERSITYOFCAUFORNMIRNNE 3.391186 2A07.91 (9W.9S) -29AM T9W%TZOM 1.OW.716.37 02.01.65 (117,761.71) 737 IIA4101 MILLETT INDUSTRIES 166.W 11T.22 1On SAM 738 11-1-02 PRECISION RESOURCE,CALIFORNIA DIVISION 11.899A2 13,03.911 1,0N.51 16.26% 739 11-1-1106 GOLDEN WEST CIRCUITS.INC. 1W.22 437.02 e.W 1.56% 710 11-14,07 M.S.BELLOWS 260.51), 317.0 a.0 16.21% 711 11-1411 SENSOTRON.INC. 1.17lA6 9111.15 (109.91) -1&21% 712 11-1412 ACCURATEMETALFABRICATORSINC. 2.=.W 2,TJ3.05 2.75 DAM 713 11-1413 NUEVO ENERGY COMPANY 31.156.0 32208.86 T4283 2.36% 711 11-1415 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT 1871.42 2,013.80 39.38 1.99% 745 11-1.Ot6 WLUNGSWORTHOILCOMPAMY 1.12821 1.376.90 216.69 22.04% 716 11-1417 J.R.O.OPERATIONSTRUST 158.35 115.32 (13.03) -281% TO 114419 SOUTH COAST ON.COMPANY 255.67 232.36 (23.31) -9.10% 716 11-1A 1 BRINDLE/THOMAS OIL COMPANY ' 719 11-1.02 SUPERIOR FORGE INC. ' TW 11-1-050 ANO DART,INC. 3,512.0 3.269.911 (26275) -7.20% 751 t1-1-0B9 CAtrBURUM INDUSTRIES INC. 6.50.05 5,502A7 (1,659.68) -16.15% 752 11-1-113 SPEEDY CIRCUITS.FACILITY 02 151.01 1W.M (W 0) -mm TO 11-1-1N ROCK INDUSTRIES,INC. I71.61 188.86 17.W 3.66% 751 11-1-129 SPEEDY CIRCUITS.ON.OF PJO TECH..INC 1.073.57 I.M.21 (7.33) -e.M% 70 11-1-In TIODIZE COMPANY,INC. 1,07.70 W.67 (143..0) -13.92% IW PERMIT RATE IMPACTt.Ms SUMMARY C21 W23198 Impact of Permit User Rate Change Page 13 o113 RN Parma CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE PERCENT N9mbe[ Nvmoer ComwnvN... TOTAL TOTAL mccucA__ CHANGE 7% 11-2A05 SOUTHCOASTOILCORPORATION 1,159.72 037.26 GMA8) -12.10% 757 11-2008 SOUTHRIDGE HOMES 12.01 10.43 (2.48) 49.16% na 11.2409 SIGNALASSOCIATES 4.61 3.72 (0,05) -19.18% 759 1144111 GOLDENWEST LAUNDRY&VALET SERVICES INC. 2.958.52 2,909.38 (47.14) -L50% 760 11d 012 TERRA EXPLORATION 6 PRODUCTION COMPANY 50.85 41.10 (9A5) n.10% 781 11- 016 LAUNDERLAND 1.252.31 1.231.80 (27.0) -2.10% 702 11.3-015 MAAG'$LAUNDRIES 784.0 767.62 (17.22) -2,19% 703 11-2-022 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS AEROSPACE 53,043.15 53,264.24 (570,92) .1.05% TN 11-b020 LAUNDERLAND 479.63 459.11 (10.32) -2.19% 785 1L2.ON WEAVER'S PRODUCTION SERWCE - - - 766 11-24125 PIER OIL COMPANY 26.69 21.40 (5.101 -19.15% 767 11- 092 CAMBRO MANUFACTURING 1,963.53 2.102.10 115.55 5.98% 768 11-2-ID3 ALEXANDER OIL COMPANY 4&U 39.O7 (ev) -10.16% TM 11R-1N CAPROOILCOMPANY bl6.aa 417.13 (20.16) -19.15% TTO 11•b147 W.M.ELLIOTT 16.14 13.05 (3.10) -19.16% nt 11-2.166 GEORGE AND SONS COIN-OP LAUNDRY 1,300.2T 1,331.12 (".Is) -2.14% Tit 11-2-069 GOLDENWEST REFINING COMPANY 53.82 6482 0.50 0.78% TRI 11-2.1% HUNTINGTON GARDENS CENTER 273.64 29080 19.30 S.BI% n4 11.2-200 HUNTINGTON BEACH CAR WASH 1.151.73 M.28 (1N.I81 -16.88% n6 11-2@89 PETROPRIZE 89.76 72.58 (ITZN -10,18% na 1144!65 WLVIAN JEWELL RENNER 2.57 2.06 (0.49) -10.18% M 11.2.205 WILLIAM J.$ODn 150.6a 121.76 (25.00) -19.18% n6 11-2-299 SHERRY$LAUNDERLANO NO.N 538.17 (12.07) -tee% 799 11-341U1 SIZZLER STEM(HOUSE CIO FORSCO MGMT CORP 1.100.74 1,166.55 65.80 5.98% na 11.M02 BANS SEAFOOD 512.06 642.0 30.01 5.95% 781 11-M04 CEC ENTERTAINMENT,INC93BA CHUCK E.CHEE 951.03 1,07.09 56.86 5.98% 782 11-3-006 HUBBELL FAMILY LLC 2,538.13 2.689.66 151.73 5.98% 783 11- 008 SPARKS ENT..LP DNA WARNER DALE SQUARE 1.553.91 1,752.78 98,87 5.N% 764 11b007 SPIRES RESTAURANT,INC. 1,206.34 1.276.99 72.15 5.9a% TB! 110008 WARNER CENTER ASSOCIATES 2.730.68 2,900AS 10378 5.00% TN 11-0 009 CARE ENT.WEST DNA CARE WEST GARFIELD 1.797.07 1,906.34 107.48 5.98% TA 11-1090 BOLSA CHICA STATE BEACH-HE 3,182.55 3,351,61 189.06 6,28% 786 it-Y10 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 01 437.76 463.93 26.17 598% 789 11-Y145 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 62 027.19 ON." 37.49 5,98% no 11A149 GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 0 54.21 67.45 3.24 5.98% 721 11S162 THE HUNTINGTON 4,019J7 4,259.6a 24en 898% 792 11b163 HUNTINGTON BEACH CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL 3,660.77 3,879.01 213.84 6.96% 793 11-3-269 US POSTAL SERWCE(WARNER-HUNTIBEACN) 1.914.26 2,028.70 114.44 S.98% Tmm for Zwa 160.352.08 100,050.29 1,708.21 1.08% TN 112.002 RIVERBEND HAND CARWASH 6N.10 516.24 (167.80) -24.54% GROW T01m for DI.Wd 7.472.516.30 7.431,506.71 (41.245.96) 4.55% NJ PERMIT RATE IMPACTIAS SUMMARY(2)