The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998-04-22 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 16, 1998 NOTICE OF MEETING (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS mailing P0.Box 8127 NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 PD.Bad 812] Fountain Vallay, CA OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 sweet 44Ela Avenue WEDNESDAY, APRIL 22, 1998 - 7:30 P.M. 1G844 Ella Avenue Fsun Valley.CA 92 92708JO18 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member AgenciB8 The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County 0 Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, tines California, will be held at the above location, time and date. Anaheim area scene Park Cypress Fountain Volley Fullerton Hantington Beach B r S rotary Irvine La Habra Le Palms Las Alamitos Newport Beach Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Orange Placenta Santa Are Seal Beach stemmn STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,April 22, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Tustin Ville Park Yerbe Linda OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND County of orange TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 6, 199B at 5:30 p.m. PLANNING, DESIGN AND Sam., Districts CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, May 7, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Costa Mesa Gereen Grove STRATEGIC PLAN WORKSHOP - Saturday, May 9, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. Midway Ct, Water Dietmcts FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND Irvine conch HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 13, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 27, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Commlued is Protecting the Environment since 7954 JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Joint Board Meeting May May 27, 1998 June June 24, 1998 July July 1, 1998 July July 29, 1998 August August 26, 1998 September September 23, 1998 October October 28, 1998 November November 18, 1998 December December 16, 1998 January January 27, 1999 February February 24, 1999 March March 24, 1999 April April 28, 1999 May May 26, 1999 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS'ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING April 22, 1998-7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. j In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that thereI, is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the j posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to ; the meeting date. i t__... .....__.___._.�.�.�.........—.— ........—_.._...... .... .._... _......... 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: a. ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing consideration of Item 21.b. and c. listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). b. Verbal report of General Counsel C. Receive and file Summons and Cross-Complaint, David Deese v. Orange County Sanitation, Mahin Talebi and Tadao Vitko, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 786591, in connection with a civil enforcement proceeding for violation of hazardous substance and materials laws; and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. WadonkdataI\wp.dta\agenda\1998 AN Board AgendasO42298suppsgenda.doc MEETING DATE: 04/22/98 TIME:7:30 P.M. DIsTRICTs: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS ILURL...................................... GUIGAN.................. I .. . FERRYMMN ........ ..(Y6✓G IHOLMBEROI....................ANDERSON................... ICOON ......... .....MURRHY. ..... IFO.........._................BANKHAD.................. IPons).... SALTAREW........ IUNESI...........................BROADWATER.............. ....................... :HASTNGS)..................... ROWN........................ (STINERI ............... COOK)............................ ER _ _ COLLINS..............4........ �G NOYEBr.........................OFAAv..F.�iliA.4C@^_.... DISTRICT 2 IFRESCHR........................GENES.......................... _ IUNDERHIW....................ECKENRODE......4...........JG NARMANI.......................DETTLOFE.............. .......y _ ICOONRI........................MURRIY.......................�G IDOTSONI........................DONAHUE..................... JG — IHOLMBERGI..................-ANDERSON...................JG � IPAW(ERI.........................DUNLAP....................... IFLORYI...........................SANKHEAD................... IUNDERHILU....................ECKENROOE.................. — :COOK) ...........................BROAOWAIEN.............. IRJIRYI...........................FERRYMAN................... ICOOKI............................COLLINB....................... IWISNERI.........................OULLUISON.................. (FRESCHII........................DENES.......................... IOAMOLL.......................JOKES.,&XXXAQ.......JL IPARKERI.........................DUNLAP....................... IBROADWATERI...............OF ES.......................... RVISNERI.........................GULLLCSON.................. (MAULLLRI......................MARSHALL............. ILURI.............................MCOUIOAN.................... ILURI.............................MC DUIGAN..................�� ISTEINERI........................ZEWL.. ........................az IWALKERI........................MNER BRADFORD.........�z IDALV)............................2EMEL..........................f,,G ICOONRI........................MURPHY........................ y — IDEBAYI..........................MOWS......................... . DISTRICT 3 (EVANS)..........................RICE..........W................... SWANS)..........................RILE............................ IPoTTSI...........................SALTAM ................. % — IWALKERI........................MNER BMOFORD.........— ..// ................�� _ INAMMONDI....................B ...........................(HOLMBERG)....4..............ANDERSON...................— STINERI....................4....S R....................... (FLORYI .....................BR D................... — (SRER)........................STNER.....4................ (HASnNGSI.....................BROWN........................ IHARMANI.................... .SUWAN.................... IDO ............................DOLLINS ..................... IMILER.......................... :................._..... IDOTSON ........ ...............DONAHUE.................. IAEST...........................MINA 4...................... IPARKER1........ ................WNLAP IDALVI............................ ZEWL.......................... JLc/6✓'T _. (B DL ................. ILEYE IMOAATE. ...............JOKES....AA...[.................._...._............... AULUR ....................MARSHAU................... .�1.�� BTg ILURI ..... ....................MCOURIAN.................... ]� iSTEINEFS .......................SRR FF �RSOIN (HARMAN)..................... D"L............................. (SATES).....................4....4 YLVIA............4........... HODGES......................... IDALYI............................ ZEWL........................ yJ_.L/G KYLE............................... / DISTRICT S MCNTYRE.......................� (NOVEW..........................MAY ...... DOTEN............................. IDEBAYI..........................NOWS.........................$� IETERMAN......................JG (SPITZER)........................STENER...4................... STREED...........................�L TUCH MAN.......................�G DISTRICT B WHEATUE ......................IKARY �G MI..........................FERRYMAN................... ...................................... INTZE — ISRRERI........................SIEWER. ................ ...................................... INOYESI'......................._'BEMY...AJIQ/.�/1.�!/..... ._ ...................................... ...................................... DISTRICT 7 OTHERS IHAMM.ND)....................MLTAREW.....__....... ✓ p, // MAMMONDI..................sB11G'.....ay.y..... F^ WOODRUFR...._.................. .�/LJFTaN_v A(`pYlzli JKRAY)r:........................iOAY AN..LK!4......... ANDRUS..........4........._.... IPENIYI...........................MC41U FERRYMAN................... MGM...................4.4......._ IIURI.............................MCOUgAN................... LEE.................................�L ICOONRI........................MURPHV....................... LINDSTROM..................... ISRRFRI........................STENER.......................Q< NIXON............................. S H A W......4...................... DISTRICT 11 STONE............................ IHARMANI.......................GETTLOFf............... ..... IHARMANI.......................SULLMAN............... ..... _ ISnWERI........................SP Ell........................ DISTRICT 13 IPARKERI....................4....DUNLAP.......................� IW ISNERI.........................GUU-MSON................... ISRRERI........................MNFA..................._.. ICOONRI........................WRR1V....................... IDALYI............................ZE1101EL..................... DISTRICT 14 NAMMONDI.................."MIBA�........................ IPOTTSI...........................SALTAREW.........._...... ICOONRI.................4......MURRIY....................... ISPIRERI..................I.....STENER...................... IMILLER............................SMMM...................... - - \\nJon\Ee[el\wp.J\s\Wmin\BS\DNECTDP\Direcmn POI.C OC/TT 04122.N /90 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on 4LA,LF' -14 19L,�was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on d,s LA� I& 19� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this/lid day of Penny Kyle, Si#6tydyof each of the Boards of Director County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California $Wo m.IF77A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 15, 1998 phone: (714)962-2411 To the Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors mailing address: P.O. Box 6127 Foentam valley,CA Subject: Board Letter 927268127 street address: 10e44 are Aaenue The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional Fourvidn valley.CA 927aea CA information on any items, P of the i lease call me. sz Board of Supervisors Adopts Resolution Supporting Consolidation Member On Tuesday, April 14, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing for protests Ag.nC1B° against consolidation of our nine districts into one district. No protests were made at • the hearing and the Clerk of the Board will forward a resolution approving the Cities consolidation to LAFCO. LAFCO will file a Certificate of Completion with the County Recorder, County Assessor, and the State Board of Equalization. The Certificate of anaBra. Completion consolidates the Districts into the Orange Count Sanitation District errs P 9 Y Buena Perk effective July 1, 1998. Lypreea Fountain Valley Fullerton Huntington Beech California Pilot Project Irvine La Hams Since December 1997, the Districts has been participating in a California Pilot Project Le Palma P P 9 1 Los Alamitos with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA's) Office of Newport Beach Global Programs. As part of the Pilot Project, the Districts uses an Experimental Orange Placentia Weekly Threats Assessment weather forecasting tool not available to the general Seat B ach public. This forecasting tool provides an advance warning of potential storm $BBStame� conditions above and beyond what is provided by NOAA's National Weather Service. reetin The Districts used this tool to help make decisions regarding activation of the High Ville Perk Flow Emergency Response Plan. rorba Linda County of orange NOAA's Office of Global Programs invited Dan Tunnicliff of the Safety and Emergency Response Division to participate in a presentation of the California Pilot Project at a Sanitary Districts workshop on Regional Climate Variability and Climate Change held in Santa Barbara Costs Mesa March 9— 11. NOAA paid Dan's travel expenses. Garden Grove Midway city The workshop was sponsored by the National Science Foundation and organized by Water Districts the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis. Attendance at the workshop was by invitation only and was one of a series of workshops supporting a twine Ranch national assessment process organized by the U.S. Global Change Research Project and the White House Office of Science, Technology, and Policy. The purpose was to identify key environmental stresses to California, identify and assess the impacts of increased climate variability and climate change as they interact with these stresses, determine information needs to better understand these changes, and identify mechanisms to address climate change issues. A Public wastewater and Environmentel Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Envirenment Since 1954 9 Members of the Boards of Directors Page 2 April 15, 1998 Pollution Prevention Trainino The Districts received a plaque from the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) for assisting in a Pollution Prevention Workshop held at Plant No. 1 on March 12, 1998. OCHCA is responsible for implementing and enforcing hazardous waste-related regulations within Orange County. OCHCA used the Auto Shop Complex to conduct training and hands-on demonstrations of various pollution prevention technologies. As a benefit for hosting the Workshop, the Districts was able to send several employees to the workshop. The Districts intends to participate in more joint training with OCHCA and other agencies in the future. Bring Your Daughter to Work Dav Thursday, April 23, all employees have been invited to bring their daughters to work. This annual event includes a tour and an ice cream social. For those employees with sons, their day will be held in August. Last year we had about 60 employees and daughters attend. NPDES Permit Update Nancy Wheatley has received word from the US EPA that our permit should be in hand by the April Board meeting. It was targeted for release on April 10, however, the permit writer was out sick for a week and is negotiating with Honolulu this week. Nancy also reports that the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, a large discharger on the East Coast, recently received its draft NPDES permit, after a waiting period that was slightly longer than ours. Provisions of interest include: Operation of a three-dimensional model of Massachusetts Bay, which was developed several years ago and includes the plume dynamics - A public education program that includes a pollution prevention website - Minimum operating and repair/replacement reserves of$31 and $50 million, respectively - A water conservation program based on river subwatersheds - And a contingency plan to denitrify ( for a plant with a capacity of 1.2 billion gpd that discharges into 100 feet of relatively open ocean) Members of the Boards of Directors Page 3 April 15, 1998 _Court Issues First Jail Term in California for Pollution from Animal Feeding Operations From the WEF website, staff found the following article. March 20: The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California in Fresno issued the first jail sentence handed down in the stale against an operator of a concentrated animal feeding operation for violating water pollution laws. After pleading guilty to 10 violations of the Clean Water Act, Pete Hettinga, managing partner of the 3H Dairy Farm in Oakdale, was sentenced to 90 days in jail, 90 days of subsequent home confinement, ordered to pay a $100,000 fine, and make $101,000 worth of improvements at the farm. He was also sentenced to four years of probation. Hettinga pleaded guilty to the negligent discharge of wastewater polluted with cow urine, feces, and washwater into waters that flow into the Tuolumne River and Sacramento Delta, the court said. he case was investigated by the Dairy Waste Enforcement Task Force, which includes members from several state and federal agencies. Combined Meetings of the Steering Committee and the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan The Steering and Ad Hoc Committees will be meeting jointly on April 22, June 24, and September 23 to review the next quarter's schedule of Board workshops on the Strategic Plan. US EPA's National Biosolids Partnership On March 17, AMSA sought the assistance of its members in requesting Congress to appropriate $1 million to support the National Biosolids Partnership. Those AMSA members with representatives on House and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees responsible for EPA appropriations were asked to contact their representatives to request that the $1 million for the Partnership be included in EPA's 1999 budget. In 1997, EPA invited AMSA and the Water Environment Federation (WEF) to form the National Biosolids Partnership to promote the beneficial use and public acceptance of biosolids. EPA has made $250,000 available in 1998 to serve as the foundation for the Partnership. Some of the projects slated for 1998 include: development of a code of management practices manual; updating a national communications plan; development of pretreatment success stories; and set up of an information clearing house to provide multi-media information on CD-ROM. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 4 April 15, 1998 To fully implement the Partnership's mission, however, an additional $1 million is required. The additional funds would support a media training and relations project for POTW public affairs professionals; grass roots training; development of technical manuals and guidance; and other initiatives designed to promote public acceptance of biosolids. Attached is a copy of Joint Chairman Collin's March 30 letter to Senator Barbara Boxer, seeking her support in securing funding for the National Siosolids Partnership. If you have questions on this important issue, call Blake Anderson at 714 593-7110. AMSA National Environmental Achievement Award Ed Torres, manager of O&M's Air Quality and Special Projects Division, will receive AMSA's National Environmental Achievement Award on Monday, May 18, 1998. Ed has been co-chairing AMSA's Air Quality Committee since 1992. As Co-Chair, he has lead AMSA's effort in negotiating with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on developing Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standards for publicly- owned treatment works (POTWs) like the Districts. These standards, which will likely be finalized by the end of this calendar year, are designed to control air toxic emissions from POTWs. AMSA has been extremely successful in working with the EPA to develop MACT standards that will not require existing sources to add expensive control devices to their processes. The EPA's early proposal was to regulate all POTWs that treat greater than 50 mgd of wastewater. The impact would have cost agencies millions of dollars (10's of millions for large plants like ours) to add covers to all of their processes. Because of Ed's efforts and the Committee's, very few, if any POTWs, will be impacted and the cost to comply nationwide will be minimal. Congratulations to Edl Groundwater Replenishment System Business Luncheon A luncheon to introduce members of the Orange County business community to the Groundwater Replenishment System will be held on Thursday, April 30. The event was originally to be held at the Water District, but due to space limitations, it has been moved to our Board Room. The luncheon is part of Phase II of our public outreach efforts and complements the individual meetings Water District staff and members of the Joint Cooperative Committee have been having with selected Orange County business and government leaders. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 5 April 15, 1998 Elected Officials Day to be Held This Fall You may recall that last year at this time we held our first Elected Officials Day. The event was a success and we had planned to repeat our efforts this year, preferably this spring. We considered several dates in late April and early May, but nothing seemed to work with existing schedules. Therefore, we will hold Elected Officials Day sometime this fall. We will inform you of the date as soon as it is determined. Title V Operating Permit Application The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments require major sources of regulated criteria air pollutants (e.g. oxides of nitrogen, carbon monoxide) to obtain a federal air operating permit, called a Title V permit. The Title V permit consolidates in one document all existing state permit requirements, as well as all state and federal regulatory requirements placed on the facility. Both CSDOC facilities are major sources and thus are required to submit Title V applications. The application for Plant 2 was submitted in July 1997, and it was accepted as complete in September 1997. The application for Plant 1 was submitted on March 26, 1998, and we expect to receive notice of a complete application in April or May. Preparation of both Plants' Title V applications was a substantial effort that spanned several months, involving rule assessment, permit streamlining, and compliance auditing. This effort was accomplished entirely with internal staff at a considerable savings compared to hiring an outside consultant. The impacts of operating under Title V are unknown at this time, but it will likely increase our compliance burden and administrative requirements. Plant 2 will begin operating under Title V sometime this summer. Plant 1 will most likely not operate under Title V until the year 2000. Review of the Collection and Remittance of Sewer Connection Fees by Member Agencies In December of 1997, the Districts' independent auditors, Moreland &Associates, were engaged to perform a review of the collection and remittance of sewer connection fees by the member agencies of the Districts for the year ended June 30, 1997. Their review was completed in February 1998, and there were no significant findings. Following is a summary of the issues that arose during the review: Members of the Boards of Directors Page 6 April 15, 1998 • Of the three months selected for the testing of residential sewer connection fees at each city, only two instances occurred where the fees for residential units were collected but not remitted to the Districts. In both of these instances, the under remittance of the fee was for only one residential unit resulting in a total underpayment of$4,720. • At two cities, the auditors were unable to determine the accuracy of the calculation of the connection fee for permits issued based on the type of structure or square footage because neither city records connection fees on the building permits. • Of the three months selected for testing the promptness of the remittance of sewer connection fees, there were nine instances where the fees collected were not remitted to the Districts within thirty days following the month in which the fees were collected. • At one agency, the auditors were unable to verify that the collection of the sewer connection fees were being credited to the proper District by comparing the addresses of the related structures against the Thomas Bros. Sewer Atlas because the cash receipts did not indicate the identity of related permits. The final audit report will be made available at the May Joint Boards meeting if any Director would like a copy. CALFED Bay-Delta Program Stan Sprague, general manager of the Municipal Water District of Orange County, will be at the April 22 Boards meeting to make a presentation on the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. This program seeks to develop a comprehensive long-term plan to restore ecosystem health and improve water management for beneficial uses by addressing ecosystem restoration, water quality, water supply reliability and levee and channel integrity as co-equal program purposes. For additional information on the program, I have included a copy of the Executive Overview for the program. Publications/News Articles of Interest Attached are articles from various publications that you may find interesting, including two excerpts from the Milk Producers Council's newletter. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 7 Apnl 15, 1998 Out of the Office I will be out of the office off and on between now and the end of May, attending several meetings and our May 14 and 15 Executive Management Retreat. My assistant, Jean, will also be out of the office. If you need to talk with me during my absence or if you have questions, call Blake Anderson (714 593-7110). He will have my itinerary. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Donald'F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt H%"OlANOYiMGMriWE STO, Eeoumaewnneooc Attachments: March 30, 1998 letter to Senator Barbara Boxer Executive Overview of CALFED Excerpt from Milk Happenings, Newsletter of the Milk Producers Council Newspaper articles COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Ph,na March 30, 1998 (714)9g&2411 nae9ng add,. : P.O.B.e127 The Honorable Barbara Boxer F°""dem wlft.CA 92725a127 Member, U.S. Senate 112 Senate Hart Office Building atrast s Alle u: lounuen V Ayena¢ Washington, D.C. 20510 Poureeln M7 CA g270&7G18 SUBJECT: The National Biosolids Partnership Member Speaking on behalf of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Agencies (Districts), I request your assistance in securing funding for the National 0 Biosolids Partnership program through the U.S. Environmental Protection Mae Agency's (EPA) fiscal year 1999 budget. Anehelm Bud..v� The Districts is a large publicly owned treatment works facility that serves 2.2 CW.°" million Orange County residents by treating 250 million gallons of wastewater Fountain Wiley Fldl an per day. Biosolids are the residual organic materials that are removed from wastewater by the treatment process. The Districts' aggressive enforcement Le craws of EPA's strict regulatory requirements on industrial wastewater dischargers Le Palma Lae Ma,ntea and its modern treatment processes combine to create a high quality Newport Beech biosolids product. Years of research, including numerous EPA studies, have wanda R shown land application of biosolids to be safe and an environmentally sound aal"t"Ans Beach management P g mane option. After careful evaluation of several biosolids SeSoon Stanton management options, the Districts has determined that land application of WIG Pa°n" biosolids provides the greatest opportunity to cast-effectively recycle this rorda Linda nutrient-rich organic product. Highly regulated biosolids are comparable in o✓nty of orange nutrient value to commercial fertilizers. aneary oiatricta The public generally understands that biosolids are a product of wastewater ceote Mo. treatment and supports recycling efforts. Unfortunately, a vocal minority Garden crave retains some misconceptions about biosolids recycling that threaten the M,dmy aty public acceptance of biosolids recycling in some parts of the country, Water oawata including California. EPA has been actively working with cities, states, rmne wench wastewater treatment agencies, private industry, and other stakeholders to ensure the use of safe recycling practices and to develop information on the safety and benefits of land application of biosolids. A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954 The Honorable Barbara Boxer Page 2 March 30, 1996 Recently, EPA, the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) and the Water Environment Federation (WEF) have formed the National Biosolids Partnership to focus its cooperative efforts on promoting the safe and environmentally beneficial use of biosolids. While progress has been made, financial support is crucial to prevent failure of biosolids recycling programs. Support for biosolids recycling alliances will ultimately result in greater environmental and economic benefits with less regulatory burdens and mandates. The Districts urge you to assist in the securing of funding for the National Biosolids Partnership program through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's fiscal year 1999 budget. Attached is a one-page explanation of the $1 million funding request that the Districts is asking you to consider and support. With adequate funding, the National Biosolids Partnership will most certainly be a success. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact me at (714) 962-2411. Thank you for your careful consideration. Jo Collins a2innan of the Joint Boards of Director NJW/LB:mcm H:\W P.DTA\TSM501BAROLDILXREAD1850090LTR.DOC c: Members of the Boards of Directors D.F. McIntyre B.P. Anderson N.J. Wheatley M.D. Moore L.T. Baroldi ECM File National Blosollds Partnership The Case to Support the$I Million Campaign Background In February 1993, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)released its final 40 CFR Part 503 sewage sludge(biosolids)regulations governing the use and disposal of biosolids generated from publicly owned treatment works. In 1995, the Agency proposed transferring most of its biosolids management role to the states and other stakeholders. In response to the proposal, a number of biosolids stakeholders in May 1997 developed a"vision"or future framework for the national biosolids management program. EPA later announced in early August 1997 that it was reactivating a level of funding support, identifying priority projects, and committing staff resources to the biosolids management program to implement this vision and address public misconceptions of the benefits of biosolids recycling opportunities. In addition, EPA invited two national associations serving the wastewater industry, the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) and the Water Environment Federation(WEF), to form a national partnership in collaboration with the Agency and other biosolids stakeholders to identify and coordinate activities related to promoting public acceptance of biosolids beneficial use programs. National Biosolids Partnership The EPA-led initiative resulted in the creation of the National Biosolids Partnership, which is comprised of representatives tiom AMSA and WEF and includes advisors from EPA and U.S. Department of Agriculture to plan and implement partnership activities. A Biosolids Advisory Committee, representing a majority of biosolids stakeholders, including federal, state and local government; agriculture; consultants; academia;and environmental organizations, has also been created to advise the partnership on current and fixture projects. The mission of the partnership is to coordinate the planning and implementation of enviromnentally sound biosolids projects and programs; to contribute guidance and support to the lead organization for each specific project during the planning and implementation process;and to identify and understand in sufficient detail the valid technical information gained from biosolids-related projects and programs thereby ensuring consistency in public outreach activities. The partnership's goal will be accomplished through addressing scientific, technical and public policy issues that affect the sustainable use and management of biosolids; providing assistance to local agencies in working with these issues; fostering professional development and networking;and providing technically valid credible information to all public audiences. Funding Support EPA has made approximately$250,000 available in 1998 to serve as a foundation for the Partnership. With these resources as a start, nearly 51.25 million in biosolids-related projects were identified for 1998, of which the Partnership initially approved 5340,000 for the purposes of developing a code of management practices manual with third-party verification; updating a national communications plan; chronicling pretreatment success stories; producing a report comparing the quality of biosolids with manures and fertilizers;establishing an information clearinghouse to provide multi-media information on CD-ROM; creating biosolids fact sheets and a biosolids exhibit for use at conferences. The remaining $1 million in deferred projects includes media training and relations;grass mots training; development of technical manuals and guidance; and other initiatives designed to promote public acceptance. To fully implement the mission of the National Biosolids Partnership, external funding support in the form of a$1 - million legislative appropriation is requested to ensure that resources are available to support sustainable biosolids activities and promote opportunities to recycle this valuable resource. i MILK HAPPENINGS Milk Producers Council 136" Euclid Avenue Orrin o, CA 91761 (999}628-6018 Jan, Feb, Mar 1999 MPC Works to Improve Flood Control in Chino Valley February Rain Hits Chino Basin Last year WC slaty was invited to a workshop organized The February rain storms hit Chino Valley and the by Orange County Sanitation District and other local govern- Southern California dairy industry hard Ontario flood meat regulators to disevus storm water tun-off in the Chino control systems failed and dumped city flood water through Bacin ending up in the Santa Ana River. At that meeting, the enure dairy area. 1Tousands of taws died and aver WC staff agreed to work with a proactive group to address 10,000 heifers and calves also perished from the deep the serious problems facing the Watershed an the handling of muddy corrals which caused exhaustion and other health livestock wale. The new group is call the Water Correctiom related problems. The cows stood in belly-dap mud rendt- a shared governance project The participants include repre- ing in a lengthy milk cycle because of the time involved in sentatives from Orange County, the Sanitation h—gaLr of getting the cows into the barn and ready to milk. Assm. Oren a Cozen Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, Fred Aguilar,R-Chino, immediately notified Gun. Pete Wil- hino Basin Water District,State Fish and Wildlife,EIMTOn- son of the terrible situation and asked him to announce a menial Pmtwuon Agency,Santa Ana Re$oWd Water Quality state-ot-master in San Bernardino, Riverside and San Control Board, Orange County Water District, and City of Diego counties. Aguilar also introduced a legislative=In- Ontariojust to name a few. Director Geoffrey Vanden Beuvel lion calling on Congress to make more aid available to and Beb Fwnstra arc repr-scming h%Ulk Producers Come" storm-ravagod Inland dairy farms. and producers interest We are working on some projects Congressmen George Brown, Jerry Lewis and Ken which include the funding for additional flood comrol and the Calvert were succesdul in asking President Clinton to add handling and management of livestock waste. We have asked the three counties in Southern California as disaster areas. U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer,Slate Assemblyman Fred Aguilar Milk Producers Cowell is working with USDA Farm Set- and Supervisor Larry Walker to help provide emergency vices Agency on flm Livestock Indemnity and Dairy Pay. funding($15 minion) for disaster protection. This funding went Prograns. Staff is in the process of verifying the loss would assist in expedrwg coast uction of needed local flood of livestock and production. MPC will organize local control facilities. In addition it is anticipated that such fund- information mceliogs in late March or April with the ing would provide improvements along ow roads, for exam- USDATSA representatives who will provide information pie dikes and berms would confine and convey flood waters and answer questions on these programs. Updates on relief through the dairy area without flood waters breaking into and will be sent to all dairymen in the three counties. Any damaging nor dairy facilities. This effort is very time con- questions,please contact ow office. mining; however, it is necessary in Prorating our land and dairy operations. More information will follow in the next publication. ovemew.nmL at calteo.ca.gov Page 1 of 6 EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW At the confluence of California's two largest rivers,the Sacramento and San Joaquin,the San Francisco Bay and adjoining Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta(Bay-Delta)together form the largest estuary in the western United States.The Bay-Delta is a haven for plants and wildlife,supporting over 750 plant and animal species. The Bay-Delta supplies drinking water for two-thirds of ' California's citizens and irrigation water for over 7 million acres of the most highly productive agricultural land in the world. There is a rich history of conflict over resource management in the Bay-Delta system. For decades the region has been the focus of competing interests—economic and ecological,urban and agricultural.These conflicting demands have resulted in several resource threats to the Bay-Delta: the decline of wildlife habitat;the threat of extinction of several native plant and animal species;the collapse of one of the richest commercial fisheries in the nation;the degradation of the Delta as a reliable source of high-quality water;and a Delta levee system faced with an unacceptably high risk of failure. Even though environmental,urban,and agricultural interests have recognized the Delta as critical, for decades they have been unable to agree on appropriate management of the Delta resources. Consequently,the numerous "traditional" efforts made to address the Bay-Delta problems,including government decrees,private remediation efforts, and seemingly endless rounds of litigation,have failed to reverse the steady decline of the Delta as fish and wildlife habitat or as a reliable source of high-quality water. A significant breakthrough in this ongoing conflict occurred in 1994,when state and federal agencies and representatives of the major interest groups signed the Bay Delta Accord. The Accord contained agreements on interim water quality protections for the Bay-Delta,on several procedural and substantive concerns under the state and federal endangered species acts, and on a multi-million dollar effort to address nonflow factors affecting ecosystem health in the Bay-Delta.The Accord represented the first successful attempt at a comprehensive approach to Bay-Delta problems, addressing environmental concerns about the ecosystem as well as providing more certainty and reliability for water users. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program(Program)is a continuation of the consensus-seeking, comprehensive approach to California water management issues hoped for in the Accord. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program is an open, collaborative, state-federal-stakeholder effort seeking to develop a comprehensive long-term plan to restore ecosystem health and improve water management for beneficial uses of the Bay-Delta system. The Program is fundamentally different from previous efforts because it seeks to address ecosystem restoration,water quality,water supply reliability, and levee and channel integrity as co-equal program purposes.The Program is developing a comprehensive package of Program elements that,together, must: ' Improve and increase aquatic and terrestrial habitats and improve ecological functions in the Bay-Delta to support sustainable populations of diverse and valuable plant and animal species • Provide good water quality for all beneficial uses • Reduce the mismatch between Bay-Delta water supplies and current and projected beneficial uses dependent on the Bay-Delta system • Reduce the risk to land use and associated economic activities, water supply infrastructure, and the ecosystem from catastrophic breaching of Delta levees The unprecedented scope of the Program cannot be overstated. The vast geographic extent of the area under consideration,the variety and complexity of the hydrological and ecological process involved, and the magnitude of the potential economic consequences for California's enormous commercial,agricultural,and industrial base all combine to make this effort the most ambitious of its thttp://calfed.ca.gov/currenVphase2/overview.html 3/26/98 overview.html at calfed.ca.gov Page 2 of 6 kind anywhere in the world. In the United States,only the well-known efforts at addressing ' environmental and institutional problems in the Chesapeake Bay and in the Florida Everglades can serve as comparisons. The CALFED Program has used public workshops, an advisory council,technical work groups,and ' an interagency team to identify and evaluate potential long-term solutions. This work was divided into three discrete phases.In Phase I,completed in September 1996,the Program identified the problems confronting the Bay-Delta system,developed a mission statement and guiding principles, and devised three basic alternative approaches to solving the identified problems. In Phase II the Program has refined the preliminary alternatives,is conducting a comprehensive ' programmatic environmental review, of which this report is a portion,and is developing an implementation strategy.A final environmental document is targeted for completion in late 1998. In Phase III, beginning in 1999,the Program, including any additional site-specific environmental review and permitting,will be implemented over the next 20 to 30 years. rm�w. Wm�y aw.noy t� Daa,m.m. nenn.emw. m W. a.porr i i ' This Phase 11 Report is one of many supporting documents published in conjunction with the draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report(EIS/EIR). The main body of the EIS/EIR provides a technically oriented analysis of the broad environmental effects that might accompany Program implementation. This Phase II Report describes the CALFED process, solution alternatives and the fundamental Program concepts that have guided their development,and analyses that have revealed the comparative technical advantages of each alternative. Finally,this report describes how CALFED will use analysis results in a public process to proceed to selection of a preferred program alternative by late 1998.This Phase II Report and the Executive Summary of the EIS/EIR are being widely disseminated.The full EIS/EIR, other technical appendices, and supporting technical reports—comprising thousands of pages—are available from CALFED. Some basic concepts related to the Bay-Delta system and its problems have guided the development of potential CALFED solutions. These concepts are discussed in more detail in Cha ter 2ter 2. First, for water in the system,the greatest conflict occurs when it is scarce. We can take advantage of this time value of water to store water in surface and groundwater storage in times of high flow in order to release it for agricultural,environmental, and urban purposes in times of shortage,when the greatest conflicts exist among the competing uses. Second,many of the system's problems are interrelated,so the solution must be comprehensive; no single action or project can possibly resolve all of the conflicts. The foundation of every CALFED alternative is the common Program elements: the ecosystem restoration program, water quality program,water use efficiency program,levee protection plan, http://calfed.ca.gov/current/phase2loverview.ht W 3/26/98 overview.html at calfed.ca.gov Page 3 of 6 water transfer policy framework,and watershed management coordination program. These common I Program elements differ only slightly between alternatives. Each of the individual common Program elements is a major program on its own, and each represents a significant investment in and improvement to the Bay-Delta.system. For example,the ecosystem restoration plan is the largest, most complex ecosystem rehabilitation effort ever undertaken anywhere. A significant part of the overall performance of the CALFED Bay-Delta Program is attributable to the common Program elements. These common Program elements are described in more detail in Chapter 3, and full descriptions of each element are available in the technical appendices accompanying the Draft Programmatic EIS/EIR. During the Phase 11 process, stakeholders have raised significant questions and issues about different aspects of the common Program elements. CALFED recognizes that addressing these questions and issues on common Program elements is fundamental to the success of the Program. In Chapter 3,we have included sidebar discussions of stakeholder concerns;in Chapter 3 and Chapter 5 we have laid out proposed processes for resolving these critical concerns. The Program alternatives evaluated in this EIS/EIR fall into three basic approaches to solving the problems: Alternative 1 -Includes programs for ecosystem restoration,water quality, levee and channel e integrity,water use efficiency, water transfers,and watershed management coordination. In addition, Alternative I proposes existing Delta channels, with some modifications for water conveyance and various storage options. Alternative 2-Includes programs for ecosystem restoration,water quality, levee and channel integrity,water use efficiency,water transfers,and watershed management coordination. In addition, Alternative 2 proposes significant modifications of Delta channels to increase water conveyance across the Delta combined with various storage options. Alternative 3-Includes programs for ecosystem restoration,water quality, levee and channel integrity,water use efficiency,water transfers,and watershed management coordination. In addition, Alternative 3 includes Delta channel modifications coupled with a conveyance channel that takes water around the Delta with a various storage options. Each alternative must satisfy six solution principles adopted by the CALFED Bay-Delta Program. Any acceptable solution will: • Reduce major conflicts among beneficial uses of water • Focus on solving problems in all problem areas. Improvements for some problems will not be made without corresponding improvements for other problems • Be implementable and maintainable within the foreseeable resources of the Program and stakeholders • Have political and economic staying power and will sustain the resources they were designed to protect and enhance • Have broad public acceptance and legal feasibility, and will be timely and relatively simple to implement compared with other alternatives • Will not solve problems in the Bay-Delta system by redirecting significant negative impacts, when viewed in thew entirety,within the Bay-Delta or to other regions of California In Phase II,the Program has performed technical analyses to determine how the three alternatives perform when measured against 18 distinguishing characteristics. All of the alternatives share a high http://calfed.ca.gov/currenVphase2loverview.html 3/26/98 overview.heml at calfed.ca.gov Page 4 of 6 level of performance by virtue of the program elements that are common to all three: ecosystem restoration, water quality,levee and channel integrity,water use efficiency, water transfers, and watershed management coordination.The distinguishing characteristics are intended to help CALFED and members of the public determine the relative performance levels of each alternative. The distinguishing characteristics: More critical distinguishing characteristics Less Critical distinguishing characteristics • In-Delta water quality • Storage and release of water • Export water quality • Water transfer opportunities • Diversion effects on fisheries • South Delta access to water • Delta flow circulation • Total cost • Water supply opportunities • Habitat impacts • Assurances difficulty • Land use changes • operational flexibility • Socio-economic impacts • Risk to export water supplies • Ability to phase facilities • Consistency with the solution principles • Brackish water habitat Among these characteristics, some were found,through the evaluation process,not to vary greatly among the three alternatives,while other characteristics truly allowed us to distinguish differences in performance. These more critical characteristics are the ones in the left column above. At this time, CALFED has not made any determination about how the alternatives perform in terms of the "assurances" or"consistency with solution principles" characteristics. Although extremely critical to the ultimate decision of a preferred program alternative, evaluation of these two characteristics is highly subjective,and CALFED intends to make that evaluation only after considering the comments of the interested public.As to the remaining distinguishing characteristics listed above,CALFED is presenting in this Phase H Report the results of the technical evaluations of these characteristics performed thus far. Based on the assumptions made in the technical evaluations, Alternative 3 appears to have the potential to provide greater performance on these particular characteristics. At the same time, however,Alternative 3 appears to present the most serious challenges in terms of assurances and implementability. CALFED has not identified a preferred program alternative.A great deal of additional technical review and dialog will need to take place among elected officials,CALFED agencies,local agencies, interest groups,and the public before a decision can be made. Together,all interests will need to answer questions such as: • Are the assumptions and technical evaluations performed by CALFED valid? • Are the common Program elements contained in each alternative adequate to ensure overall Program success? • How well does each alternative meet the CALFED solution principles?Is any one alternative clearly superior to others? • Is the construction of water facilities (such as an isolated conveyance facility)acceptable to the public? • Are beneficiaries willing to pay for a comprehensive Bay-Delta solution? • Can we devise an adequate assurance package of actions and mechanisms to assure that the Program will be implemented and/or operated as agreed? http://calfed.ca.gov/current/phase2loverview.html 3/26/98 ' overview.html at calfed.ca.gov Page 5 of 6 Deliberations that enable us to answer these questions and select the preferred program alternative will be the focus for the rest of Phase II of the Program. This report will help you prepare to participate in these deliberations. It is structured to introduce the Program Cha ter 1 and describe some significant fundamental Program concepts Cha ter 2 . It also describes the Program alternatives (Chapter 3 , explains the technical evaluation ChM ter 4),and explains the process that CALFED will use to Identify a preferred program alternative Cha ter 5 . Cha�terr5 discusses many policy and programmatic questions on which CALFED is requesting specs Icf input. Resolution of these questions and issues is imperative before State and Federal decision makers and interested stakeholders can decide on a comprehensive solution. The format of this report includes "sidebars"that identify the issues of concern or areas where greater detail is provided on a particular topic. Because this is a summary report of the Phase II process, it includes references to sections in the Programmatic EIS/EIR where additional information and/or detail may be found. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 1. INTRODUCTION The Program Public Involvement Next Steps in Phase H ' 2. FUNDAMENTAL PROGRAM CONCEPTS Interrelationships System Variability and the Time Value of Water Adaptive Management Related Concepts 3. PROGRAM ALTERNATIVES Common Program Elements Variable Program Elements 12 Alternative Variations The 18 Distinguishing Characteristics Moving Toward a Preferred Program Alternative Description of the Three Alternatives 4. ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION Significance of Distinguishing Characteristics Most Significant Distinguishing Characteristics a Comparison of Alternatives ` 5. ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO SELECTTON OF A PREFERRED 1 PROGRAM ALTERNATIVE Implications of the Delta Conveyance Decision on Export Water Quality Implications of the Delta Decision on Diversion Effects on Fisheries Recovery Refining and Developing Consensus on Program Elements Developing a Consensus Assurances Package 6. OTHER CONTINUING/FUTURE WORK EFFORTS http://calfed.ca.gov/current/phase2/overview.html 3/26/98 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date � � 11 Subject - n Los Angeles Times A 2 4al�9� w P .(�",e (lt�ChX DWP Shaping New Survival Skills ■ Business: H From Freeman's standpoint, otoodoestheovemonabighime Because the slate law mandating Y fall,one there is only one choice 'it is a Sof paying off the $4 billion in deregulation did not set a deadline in five employees Will be business'he said."It does have m debt on DWFS for California's municipal uuhues power plants,most be And the City of it red Inter with the hue to jaio m, DWP can hold gr a ru gone. But wHi that be g customers unt8 the city agrees m And the City Council the this weak coalefired Intermountain Power enough[O tlBflSfO[Tn ItSB(f gave him some of the teals m Project In Utah that supplies a open its doom to competition.That into an dgtl ecomj1eI1[Ot.9 achlevethatgoal. thud of the eftys electricity will buy Freeman some time to After a tentative agreement on a Slashing his work force is just confront Umchallengeofprepznng Wyoulandseveraore packagewas one element in DWP General Man- the DWP to do battle in the free nmerl . I BIN reached with the last of the DWP's agar S. avid Freeman's plan m market for power labor cations, the council on Pay off much of that debt by the A bsolmUy critical toDWP's LOS ANGELES—For the coo• Wednesday gave its blessing to and of 2002.when the states power Achances of survival in this mint. an admit exermas in har- downsizing the utility. Council market is fully deregulated But to new world is the complex question gaining-table brinkmanship has members Mark Ridley-Thom" do that he will need to take of what to do about the utility's spared the Los Angeles Depart- and Nate Holden opposed the marmum advantage of this week's muddled relationship with the meat of Water and Power from move, concerned that the impact city Cumuli vote. granting him city's government Now, the utB- massive layoffs.but the real ques- would fall dispmportomeady on umprecedented power to negotiate fly s general manager has 21 long-term contracts and darounts boses_15 City Council members. mom damn i rig America's largest women and cil also ¢mplo➢ees. with the major DWP =win,, the mayor and his five appointees municipal urflftp remains union- The council also rated to freeze already being coumed by compel- to the Water and Power Cammti- swered: electric rates for four years And it jng powerproviders Can the city's public power sys- gave Freeman the authority to slon—who have been known to rem survive competition? Can an negmate long-term power con- Though the DWP is not expected pull in different directions at the infamously bureaucratic utility to open its territory to competing sometime. nurtured in the sheltered work- mats with DWPs eosting ors- power suppliers for almost four Freeman urged the chatter re- shop of monopoly trdrsiform itself ro M years two of DWP's biggest con- formers to put the DWP under the into an agile competitor in Califor. As an incentive to may with the sumera—the University of Cabfor- control of a seven-member board nia's emerging free market for utility. Freeman will be able to nia antl the stare university sys- of directors,two appointed by the pow"? offer a 5% diacovat m aar cus• rem—alreatlY have signed with mayor,two by the jimadent of the Prat of the answer will 6e deter- tamersignmga l0-year mntrect Enron Corp., a hard-charging City Council. and three public mined by what sort of DWP 'These mdimance,are designed Texas competitor. members elected Citywide. emerges from the painful do-- m make sure that we daa't lase And an offshoot m the state's The ultimate outcome N the ing that u about mshake the utility ersmmam the mmme we open the biggest utility, the Pacific Gas and emerging discussion about DWP's toitscom Electric Co..has just landed a mayor future has major consequences for If the buyout doors to comparlon." said Corso- Y severance contract needs manage the any(Jim- the city and its residents bemuse packagenegotiated over the past cli clients a s Ruth commitGalanttee who mar.energywhich operates oil company(Jim- the general contributes annually to bite months N mRumus talks, o� a special comauttre on en- mar,which operates a large calm- the ganenl fund that fmanandfi e bitter litigation and poUUCal ma- `h a couniou s erg m Wdmingmn. critical services as police and the The on a gre action and the - pm Is then pariva mlibraries. =its f works ae planned thou- bath-wan agreement with the The competitive frenzy calif only ^Is the DWP more a business m old— of emPdecide—Young and untorewanpraiseon wallStreet intensify with the opening of mom more just another branch of city old—soon will decide whether they Dan Aseheabach. a utility ana- of California to deregulation at the ovemmant? You've t to make have a future with DWP. and of this month. At that r 8 By fall,one in five of the utWty's l➢m`°tor Maotly's Investors Sere- - point, that fundamental ter decision."Free, employed will be gone.Those who Ice m New York, said the labor Souther customers served by man cold the chatter commission. leave will We generations of ex- settlement was "a positive devel- Souther California Edison,PC&E. "Right now,it's another branch of penence with them. opment' for Ins Angelei debt- antl San Diego Gas&Electric,will city government,and the govern- Res laden be free m buy their power else- Reshaping .base who remain Public utility. where. anre is designed m remain and min o nimble, competitive team restrain and are trying rngulre the tnaeado(a work mthforce accustomed people who are hying is run the m marketplace from the rigor of the department of get permission from marketplace looms as a major all awls of people all over town problem before you do anY}hmg." . orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject hf�an �11� ICW 3 iIyly8 (r1 ✓4 F0 d4l Police chief get a first-hand look at a principal's job He and other local Day Program. The principal team quickly informative. Technology, worked at Fulton; He led the Pledge of spotted the young fugitives at a "it was constant work," Miali Damele Lalak,branch suprevisor businesspeople Allegiance over the loud nearby business. said. "1 was impressed. He's at Orange County Teachers experience a day in the speaker, monitored recess, "Chief Miali's keen eye caught (Keller) got it down." Federal Credit Union,worked at handed out lunch trays — and them playing video games at a M i a 1 i and 10 other Gisler, Bob Bowie, manager at life of a school even tracked down some campus Laundromat," Keller said. representatives from local Kinkas, was at Motels. fugitives. Miali's actions Tuesday, as businesses participated in the Also, Scott Minami, project administrator. A couple of students reported well as those of other business Principal for a Day Program. manager at Presley Homes, BY JENNIF6N PEIiFZ that three seventh-graders representatives and public "This is so exciting," said worked at Newland; Michelle TheENNFountain Valle EZ jumped the wall and took of, officials,were part of an effort to Superintendent Marc Ecker. "it T u c h m a n, director of Y Miali said. help community members brings the private and public communications at the Orange Acknowledging his police understand the unknowns that sectors together." County Sanitation District, was Police Chief Elvin G. Miali got skills, the chief then got into a Principals face. Other Principal for a Day at Oka; Kristen Cornellison, a lesson Tuesday on what life is car wtlh Principal Keller and Discipline, Like recess volunteers: Janine Hemphill, manager at Talbert Medical like on the inside. tracked the boys down.Miali said monitoring and lunch duly, is director of marketing at Mimi's Group, worked at Plover; City Miali spent the day at Masuda it wasn't easy. just an everyday occurrence for Cafe helped at Courreges School; Councilman John Collins worked School working beside Principal "I was kind of upset that Don an average principal in the Sharlene Vanflooser,manager at at Talbert; and Mary Earl Don Keller as part of the (Keller) made me hang out the Fountain Valley School District. Tarbell Really, helped at Cox; Spencer, marketing director at Fountain Valley School District's window and make sounds like a All in all, Miali said his day Heather Jardim,public relations Diversified Shopping Center, seventh annual Principal for a siren," Miali joked. was a lot of fun and quite specialist at Kingston worked at Tamura. THURSDAY, March 19, 1998 THE FOUNTAIN VALLEY VIEW PAGE 3 County Flood-Control Expert to Retire Page I of 1 "- u nia Go Silo lntlex Go IMCS NEIGHBORHOOD NEWS HELP) M UNITED AIRLINES I :I L ' CUCa IME FOR SCUEUVLU 1 r saR MepE IRFORagilaa Wednesday, Much 18, 1998 COUNTYWIDE County Flood-Control Expert to Retire By SHEGBYGRAD PREV STORY Iliam Zaun,the county's longtime public works director NEXT'STORY �nd an expert on flood-control policy, is retiring at the end of the month after 39 years in county government. Zaun,61,has supervised a variety of flood-control projects, including the S1.3-billion effort to protect communities around the Santa Ana River against damage from a once-in-f00-ye:ar flood. The river project is more than half complete,and residents in Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley and surrounding areas have seen their flood-insurance rates reduced as a result. But Zaun remains concerned that the federal government might cut back the funding needed to finish the project. "The target date was 2001,"Zaun said. "But I could see it being delayed to 2006 or 2007." Zeno, a Tustin resident,began his career as a civil engineer for the county and rose through the ranks to be transportation director,and more recently,public works director. JSearch the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories. You will not a c-6�olook for stories,only to retrieve one. Copyright Los Angeles Times Sa.celiPomie GO $pe IaEe% GO 3/19/98 10:45:31 AM Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject orange County Register r+ Z�vo 5� 1�, I{ __J Canal proposal revived in Bay area clef study By JOHH HOWMD $1.3 billion Peripheral Canal, a The Associated Press concrete-lined ditch as wide as a SACRAMENTo— A proposal 12-lane freeway, approved by to save the fragile San Francisco lawmakers but rejected by vot- g ers in an emotional 1982 referen. Bay and delta—the source of 80 dum. Percent of California's drinking Voters in the northern pan of water — includes the core of a the state overwhelmingly op- mammoth project that voters re- posed the canal proposal. jected 16 years ago: the Periph- For years, environmentalists eral Canal. have complained that the delta's A 3500-pW study delivered fisheries and wetlands have suf. Monday by the CalFed Bay-Del- fered while huge amounts of wa. to Program,the product of years ter were siphoned off for other of hearings and thousands of pans of the state. They have pages of testimony,boils down to urged limits on pumping,even as three basic options: do a little,do users have said the diversions some more or do a lot. are necessary to meet demand. The last option by the state and The latest proposal, however, federal planners would call for a would move far less water out of 42-mile-long canal along the Sac- the delta — about 15,000 cubic i ramentoSan Joaquin river del- feet per second, compared with ta's edge.The channel would run 24,000 cubic feet per second in the between Hood, a tiny river town Peripheral Canal. south of Sacramento, and the 'ftalso differs from the original Clifton Forebay southwest of By- canal package in providing flood ron,where giant pumps send del- control, additional storage, wa. 9 to water south. ter-quality safeguards and better The path is the same as the fishery protections. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject orange County Register /v 3112 �n�if o� Wetlands poli "About 75 percent of this na. tion's economically important fish stock is dependent at some 6��e� point in their life on wetlands," ii said Zeke Grader, head of the doubts Pacific Coast Federation of Fish- ermen's Associations. Commercial and sport fishing now contribute S1S2 billion to the ENVIRONMENT- The country's economy and provide jobs for about 2 million Ameri- ❑ation's fish Stock cans, said the newly released could be jeopardized b study. .I lam' Y At the same time, the country a new procedure to is losing wetlands at the rate of streamline the permit 117,000 acres a year. wetlands (� once covered 104 million acres in Process. the United States, roughly an area the sizeof California.Half is The Assneated Press now gone, the groups say. SAN FRANCISCO — A new One of the hardest-bit areas is federal policy to ease develop. the Louisiana mast. ment of coastal wetlands could Jane Hicks, acting northern devastate the S150 billion fishing section chief for the Corps of En. industry, a matitiun of industry gineers' regulatory branch in officials and environmentalists San Francisco, said she expects warned Tuesday. the new proposal to be published The groups, working together at the and of March in the Feder- as the Clean water Network,un- al Register. veiled a report that Inks at the "But if the corps determines relationship of fisheries, wet. there is more than a minimal ef. lands and jobs. fect,then the project is no longer They took aim at an Army eligible"for the streamlined per- Corps of Engineers regulation mit, she said. scheduled to go into effect this month that would streamline de- velopment permits for the na- tion's wetlands. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register ah, Insecticides contaminating watennrays, disrupting food chain ENVIRONMENT' Farmers are being urged to names including Ace Hardware, But their makers say the chemi. Black Leaf, Green Light, Spec- cals are not toxic If disposed of find alternatives, but say they're expensive. traclde and ortho; and ch1arpyr- properly. ifos, also known as.Cook, Durs- Farmers have been encour..... The Associated Press on, said Chris Foe, a biologist ban, Raid, Victory and Whit- aged to find other ways to man- SAN FRANCISCO — Insecti- with the Central Valley Regional more. age pests an fruit and nut trees.:t tides popular among residents Water Quality Control Board. They're organophosphate pes- and on broccoli, tomatoes, corn-_ and growers for killing residents and "The estuaryis going sterile," ticides, related to World War 11 and carrots. .r! ands are seeping into California he told the San Francisco Exam- nerve gases and developed in the But J.R. Thiara, a Yuba City,. waterways, killingg off aquatic finer in an article published Sun- 1950s to kill flies, cockroaches, farmer who grows almond and and upsetting the food cycle, day."There are just less fish and spiders, grub worms, Fleas and peach trees,says that's not easy.-, environmental officials say. the organisms that the feed aphids, "It's not that we don't want it—, on... The chemicals,once thought to But doing the alternative meth---.' Baby salmon, striper' and The culprits are chemicals dissolve quickly, are now known ods is extremely ezpensive;'n,,.: s sturgeon now have less to feed such as diazinon, sold under to linger in the water for weeks. Thiara said. -.w h Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # I Date Subject C 3112(,F Water districts to merge in 2001. ■Fountain Valley-based in the interim. Coolidge said the merger will district consolidates With bring consumers a more uniform Coastal Municipal delivery of services.The annual operating budget for the coastal Water District. water district Is 5300,000,which Is the estimated savings of the By Amy Spurgeon,Independent merger,Coolidge said. The two wholesale agencies FOUNTAIN VALLEY—W. supply cities'water districts with of the largest wholesale water supplemental water from the districts serving Orange County Metropolitan Water District of will be merging effective Southern California. January 2001. Coolidge said Metropolitan, Plans to consolidate Fountain founded in 1929,imports water Valley-based Municipal Water from the Colorado River and the Sfe District of Orange Comfy with Hag of the water that " in Northern California. the Coastal Municipal Water 'H Orange Comfy uses is import- District were approved lid,' said Coolidge,adding that Wednesday by the Local Agency the other half comes from Formation Commission of ground water. Orange County. Coolidge said that during the 'This eliminates a duplicative 1940s, the majority of Orange layer of government," said Keith County started to need supple- G.Coolidge,associate general mental water.The coastal water manager for the Fountain Valley district,formed in the 1940s, water district. serves the coastal areas of A board of directors for the Newport Beach down to Sun new agency will be elected in Clemente;the Fountain Valley November 2000. district,formed in the 1950s, Details of the merger,such as serves the rest of Orange water rates,will be worked out County,be said. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Dat Subject e %] :j:111 Caring about the environment makes for a caring environment The coast of Huntington in almost every quarter section study that will look at potential Beach shows the commit- LOCAL POLITICS of Huntington Beach.Future parklands along the Santa Ana ment this city has for the .ti generations will always have River and properties on Pacific i environment. Where else can parks for thew children to play Coast Highway from Beach you see eight miles of pristine '- in, parks that encourage Boulevard across the Santa Ana i beaches?Beaches with access w wildlife,parks where we can River into Newport Beach. This all along its length;beaches shirley refresh ourselves when the is a magnificent concept that i where volunteers, along with '.a pressure of urban life becomes will add to the natural environ- s city crews,maintain and care dettloff too great. ment,providing acres of park- for them.We value this magng- We fought long and hard to lands and wetlands for the peo- s icent resource and know the save our wetlands, and now pie of Orange County to enjoy. s importance of caring for it. from Wainer Avenue to the The citizens of this city, Recently I had the honor of Santa Ana River we can see the along with present and past city ? being appointed to the stale ment.We are recognized results of citizens who devoted councils,worked together to s Coastal Conunission by the throughout the state as a city their time and energies to pre- make sure our environment Senate Rules Committee of the that will praleci its natural serve this invaluable resource. was protected.This strong com- i mBment will p state Legislature.After working resources. The Bolsa Chica Wetlands and pa future 25 years on coastal issues,I am Twentyago there was the Huntington Beach Wetlands generations witthh parks and r years q have been saved because our beaches free of development now proud member of coin- the foresight to put aside thou- and wetlands where birds and mission n dedicated to preserving sands of asses of parkland in people care about the natural animals will flourish—a tribute our beautiful California coast [ the heart of this city. Now every resources in thew community. to the people who cared, a know one of the reasons for this resident of Huntington Beach This is their gilt to future gen- legacy for the future. appointment was the commit- can enjoy the beauty of Central erations that someday will call ment the city of Huntington Park.City councils enacted Huntington Beach home. •SHlatey DIMILO F is the mayor of i Beach has made to its environ- ordinances that provide parks Now the city is supporting a H.Ml,ton aeadi Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Sewage spill closes part of beach Huntington Stale Beach remained shut down between Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River Jetty on Wednesday —one week after county health officials learned that 21 million gallons of raw sewage spilled into the river. The closure will remain in effect until at least Friday,said minty Health Caza Agency 'Ward Streek Someone spokesman I.azry Honeyboume. repotted that the sewer system Health officials closed the beach mulinuagy backs up,putting raw sewage in her yard in the Much 5,immediately after 19300 block in - in Sa learning r the spill that occurred _ San Bernardino County in]ate February,The to beach's two said. The slate beach's two south- ern-most parking lots will remain closed in an attempt to persuade beachgoers to spend their day elsewhere,said park- ing attendant Unda Berner. Are people paying attention to the posted signs and staying out of the water? "I know the surfers are still going in," Banner said. Beaches Closed Zi..wrlrv. I " v •'6 it x. G6 U[NCMMNS-KASINGA / W An(elu'ISmn Michael Doheny of Newport Beach ventures into the water Tuesday despite a sewage spill that closed county beaches from Hun- tington Beach to Newport Beach.An Orange County Sanitation District spokeswoman said that although Saturday's spill was mi- nor, the beaches will remained closed. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper I Section Page It I Date Subje Orange County Register m �0 3I3b �v1VlYD✓�Wu c Salt is killing state's feftile fields ENVIRONMENT' In a bare any future on that land." Oi80n0n6 cycle, 1TCl Throughout much of the West, P oY la- both the waters and the land are tion intensities Salinity salty. River waters pick up salts while maldn the San Irom land that contains it as part (; of a legacy from an earlier geo- Joaquin Valley an agri- logic time, when positions Of CUltllTal empire. these desert flatlands lay be- cultural neath a vast sea. By KAREN BRANDON When irrigation brings this wa. Chicago Tribune ter to already salt-laden fields, the liquid evaporates under the FRESNO—A powdery, white hot sun or is sucked up by plants, coating, resembling a light dust- leaving behind even more con- ing of snow, blankets the farms centrated salts — a cycle that in broad regions of the agricul- begins anew each time a crop is tural empire called the San Joa- irrigated. quin Valley. One example underscores the The substance is salt, and it is vast amount of salt involved.The killing once-fertile fields in a re- water used in a single irrigation gion that grows most of the na- season on the west side of the San tion's produce. Joaquin Valley deposits 1.2 tons Irrigation, which turned the of salts on every acre of farm- desert into farms of unparalleled land, according to the Water productivity,is leaving pans of Education Foundation, a Secra- 9 it to wither,as the salts deposited mento-based organization that by imported water accumulate studies Western water issues. in the soil. Certain soil characteristics f In the next few months,for the make the valley's western side first time in California history, particularly susceptible to salt s farmland is to be permanently buildup,but the problem is glob- retired from production because al. In the United States, for ex. it is so saline. Seen by some as a ample,the productivity of nearly last resort akin to surrendering a third of the nation's irrigated to the enemy,the voluntary land farmland has been eroded by sa- retirement program is so contro- linty problems. versial that many farmers will not speak publicly about it. Irrigated cropland is the most The U.S. Bureau of Reclama- productive in the U.S..Though tion aims to retire 12,00D acres of they represent 15 percent of the valley farms this year, the first nation's farmland, irrigated step in a plan to gradually set fields generate 40 percent of the aside tens of thousands of acres revenue from crops sold.A 1 per- for a wildlife refuge. cent decrease in productivity of Mayo Ryan,who is negotiating California's irrigated farms to sell 640 acres to the bureau, would result in losses of$167 mil- has watched his farm's produc- lion, according to federal esti- tivity wane,and with it,his fam- mates. ily's future. The cure for the buildup is to "I could see what was happen- flush away the salts and other ing to the land,"a resigned Ryan trace elements so they do not ac- said. "I have two sons farming cumulate to dangerous levels. with me now, and they wouldn't But that requires water,lots of it, Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject - Orange County Pergister in a place where supplies are signed to keep the salt problem scarce. Moreover, it requires a at bay. place to put the wastes, and in "I look at it as a matter of the San Joaquin Valley, a drain stewardship of the land."Diener to dispose of farms'wastewater said. is literally a pipe dream. The farm is arranged in a se- State and federal governments ties, allowing wastewater from spent billions of dollars planning one plot to be reused on the next and building the vast water-sup- to water crops that tolerate in- ply network that made the valley cremingly high levels of salt and into an agricultural empire. But selenium. the final portion of the system,a The fields that take on the most drain to the Pacific Oceaa to dis- salt and selenium grow Eucalyp- pose of the salts,was never built, tus trees that can be used for pa- first because the state's farmers per;shrubs and grass that can be refused to pay for it, and later used for animal feed; and salf- bmuse of environmental con- -corals,a plant described as poor cerns about damping untreated man's asparagus that is a popu- farm wastewater into water. lar salad item abroad —though ways. even Diener, an enthusiast for All this has been grist for bitter the experiment, concedes, "I disputes,some of them still going don't know how those people in an in courtrooms, among farm- Europe can eat it." ers,the government and environ- The final, inevitable crops, mentalists. Many farmers hold though, are salt and selenium, the government responsible for coming from an evaporation their mined lands and their taint- pond girded with plastic to pro- ed reputations as the villains be- text the soil and armed with bu- hind the environmental disaster. tune "canons" that can emit Government has spent milBons enough noise to keep birds from studying and advising farmers settling in on the pond. about how to best manage salini- Terry Young,senior consulting ty problems, and how to serve scientist for the Environmental the competing interests of agri- Defense Fund, says this is the culture and the environment. problem that must be addressed And environmentalists say farm- if irrigated agriculture is to he ers must come to terms with the sustained in the region. notion that salt and selenium, a "The only really long-term so- trace element that can be deadly lotion is to create a market for to wildlife, are pollutants pro- the salt and the selenium," she duced by agriculture. said. "So far,the magic solution Land retirement is not an op- hasn't been found." tion for John Diener,46,who has spent seven years transforming his 6fle acres of family farms into an experimental system de- Water Canal Plan, Debate Resurface Pagel of 3 Navre GO Site Index GO 00$AhQCIP$ MMCS STATE & LOCAL... M Irene Eu®mumvrhymrqury LWE'LL GIVE YOU THE WHOLE LIST. a Tuesday, Much 17, 1 Water Canal Plan, Debate Resurface .Policy: Proposal,twice killed by voters, is billed as one way to rescue San Joaquin Delta. It would create loop around area into Southern California. By TONYPERRY, Times Staff Writer CRAMENTO—Hide the children and the faint of heart, e Peripheral Canal debate has officially resumed. That politically incendiary plan to build a loop around the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to help bring Northern California water to Southern California, is again being discussed publicly by water wanks. It happened Monday when officials of Ca1Fed,the state and federal effort to rescue the delta from its myriad problems, released a 3,500-page tome detailing three competing plans. Two of the plans would widen some of the delta channels. But there it was, bold as ever,in alternative No. 3: a canal to link the Sacramento River and the State Water Project by bypassing the delta. True,it's been re-christened the Open Channel Isolated Facility,but it is the same basic idea that has divided the state for half a century. Monday also signaled the start of a 75-day period of 12 hearings from Redding to San Diego to seek public opinion on the three alternatives. The decision on which alternative to select will be made by Gov. Pete Wilson and U.S. Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt. But Wilson and Babbitt want to be sure there is political support for whatever plan is selected. Which means that canal supporters, particularly the mighty Metropolitan Water District of Southern California,have 75 days to overcome decades of distrust by rivals. What neither state nor federal officials want is a repeat of 1982,when state voters defeated the Peripheral Canal measure,just as they did in 1964. In 1982, support in Southern California was lukewarm, opposition in Northern California was steadfast, and the fight was one of the nastiest in a state whose history is marked by water fights. The renewed debate will test whether the nral-urban, state-federal, farmer-environmentalist,north-south coalition that has backed CalFed can endure. The 738,000-acre delta provides drinking water for 22 3/17/98 8:55:37 AM Water Canal Plan,Debate Resurface Page 2 of 3 million Californians and irrigation for the state's$24-billion agricultural industry. But the delta is being strangled by flooding,siltation and seawater intrusion from the San Francisco Bay. The reports released Monday indicate that a canal would provide a higher quality of water for Southern California,keep fish from being sucked into the current State Water Project pipes at the south end of the delta,and ensure San Joaquin Valley farmers a reliable supply of water. But Northern Californians have worried that the MWD might use a canal to literally suck the Sacramento River dry by demanding the full 2 million acre-feet of water the MWD is assured under the State Water Project. And then there is the concern that if its water no longer came through the delta,the MWD and other Southern California political interests might forsake the delta and its problems. During the 75 days,the MWD will be negotiating with Northern California water districts,environmental groups,the agricultural industry and business leaders to allay those historical fears. "Southern California has to be able to offer up assurances that the system will not go out of control," said Tim Quinn,the MWD's deputy general manager. "We need to eliminate the fear factor. That's the engine that has driven the controversy: fear of Southern California" The spirit of Monday's event was that—regardless of which alternative is selected—the competing interests in California's water wars should be prepared to compromise or risk killing the watershed that is the lifeblood of the state's economy and environment. "This may be our last opportunity for decades to solve our water problems in California," said California Secretary of State Bill Jones. The boldest of the proposals is the alternative to construct a 44-mile earthen canal so that water from the Sacramento River would enter the State Water Project near Byron,bypassing the salty and marshy delta The canal would be half the size of that planned in 1982—a reduction aimed at lessening opposition. Every California governor from Goodwin Knight to Wilson has,at one point in his administration, spoken of the need for such a canal. The canal alternative appears to offer something for everyone:water storage for farmers,wetlands restoration and wildlife protection for environmentalists,and a canal for Southern California But it also carries something to anger each group: Environmentalists are fearful of increased reservoirs because that means more dams; farmers are leery at agreeing to convert fields to wetlands;and so forth. There are indications that water politics have shifted since the 1982 fight. For openers,the fanning industry and some Northern California leaders are rethinking their 1982 opposition. One 3/17/98 8:55:37 AM Water Canal Plan, Debate Resurface Page 3 of 3 reason is that in 1982 the canal idea was a stand-alone proposal,now its part of a package. Rich Golb,executive director of the Northern California Water Assn.,which represents Northern Sacramento Valley water agencies,said his group is willing to consider a canal if there are assurances that it will not be used to deplete the Sacramento River. Sunne McPeak,a former Contra Costa Comity supervisor who led the Northern California opposition to the Peripheral Canal in 1982, is co-chairman of a CalFed advisory committee. Like Golb,she's willing to consider a canal idea because, unlike in 1982, it also includes plans for flood control, conservation,water sales between districts,and increased storage. Still,environmental groups are unhappy about the Ca1Fed process and the canal idea. Ronnie Ann Cohen,resource specialist with the San Francisco-based Natural Resources Defense Council, said her group does not think CalFed planners have done enough to promote conservation and instead seem to be fixated on "dams and ditches." Umneh the archives of the Los Angeles Times for similar stories.You will not be charged for stories,only to retrieve one. Copyright Los Angeles Times news GO Site(noes GO 3/17/98 8:55:37 AM AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING APRIL 22, 1998—7:30 P.M. --------------- in accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the City of Seal Beach re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) Active Director Alternate Director George Brown Marilyn Bruce-Hastings' 4. Appointment of Chair pm tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 04/22/98 Page 2 of 7 5. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager 1. Presentation by Stan Sprague (MWDOC) re CALFED Bay-Delta Program C. Report of General Counsel 7. EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 March 25 1998 District 2 March 25 1998 District 3 March 25 1998 District 5 March 25 1998 District 6 March 25 1998 District 7 March 25 1998 District 11 March 25 1998 District 13 March 25 1998 District 14 March 25 1998 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS 02/04/98 02/18/98 Joint Operating Fund $1,384.473.22 $1,848,475.73 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 234,297.75 306,096.54 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 21,016.69 District No. 1 28,438.12 1,838.45 District No. 2 13,707.68 0.00 District No. 3 468,301.13 3,600.03 District No. 5 4,461.73 0.00 District No. 6 0.00 0.00 District No. 7 48,727.20 0.00 District No. 11 1,628.89 0.00 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 52.184.035.72 52180.927.44 04/22/98 Page 3 of 7 CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEM NOS. 9 - 10 ) All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the Bem to be removed from the Consent Calendar The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: DISTRICT 2 9. Adopt Resolution No. 98-09-2, ordering Annexation No. 78—Joujon-Rouche Annexation to County Sanitation District No.2, .608 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim. DISTRICT 3 10. Adopt Resolution No. 98-10-3, approving Utility Agreement No. 12UT-476 with Caltrans for reimbursement of design management, construction management, inspection and associated District costs for Modifications to Portions of Magnolia Relief Trunk and Orangethorpe Relief Trunk for I-5 widening, (Segment E-2), Contract No. 3-37. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 04/22/98 Page 4 of 7 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re April 22, 1998 combined meeting of Steering Committee and Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES-NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 25, 1998 to be filed. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan re March 19, 1998 meeting. C. DRAFT AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN MINUTES- NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the meeting held on March 19, 1998 to be filed. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re April 1, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES- NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 1, 1998 to be filed. C. Authorize staff to enter into a Lease Agreement(Specification No. P-180)with Village Nurseries for 15 acres of land at the northern part of Plant No. 2 for a period of ten years. d. Approve a one-year agreement with E. I. Dupont de Nemours and Company to provide Maintenance Painting Services at the treatment plants for an amount not to exceed $833,713.00. e. Authorize a Temporary Discharge Agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District for the discharge of groundwater from the Irvine Community Development Company during the one-year dewatering constructions for Peters Canyon Wash Channel Improvement. f. Award a 68-month professional services contract to Science Applications International Corporation to conduct the core monitoring portion of the Districts' newly issued ocean monitoring program (Specification No. P-179); and approve the proposed fixed-price amount of$984,638.00 for the first 20-month program segment. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re April 2, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES- NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 2, 1998 to be filed. 04/22/98 Page 5 of 7 ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 4) 15. c. Adopt a policy to allow the General Manager to approve construction change orders that include time extensions. d. Direct staff to discontinue working on the 66 kV Substation at Plant No. 1,Job No. P1-52. e. Approve increase in authorized funds for Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades,Job No. J-34-1 and Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5, in the amount of$1,104,106.00 for Job No. J-34-1, for a total project total of $8,259,106.00 and in the amount of$229,632.00 for Job No. P2-35-5, for a total project total of$1,455.632.00, to coverall previous and anticipated costs required to complete construction. f. DISTRICT 3 Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer,Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R-1 with Mike Priich &Sons authorizing an addition of $318,486.00 to the contract, and 67 calendar days; ratify Change Order No. 4 authorizing a deduction from the contract of$72,750.00; approve an increase to the budget in the amount of$258,479.00; and accept contract as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approve Final Closeout Agreement. 16. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee re April 8, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 8, 1998 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 1998. d. Adopt Resolution No. 98-08, repealing Resolution No. 95-81 re Amended Deferred Compensation Program for Executive Management Group Employees and Management, Professional & Supervisory Employees, and amending Resolution No. 96-36 amending the Districts' Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual providing for repeal of the Deferred Compensation Program. 04/22/98 Page 6 of 7 ALL DISTRICTS 17. Authorize staff to solicit bids and award purchase orders for the following in regards to Miscellaneous Repairs to the 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39, for a total amount not to exceed $200,000.00: 1. Fabrication of hardware for permanently securing the 120-inch outfall end gate at an estimated cost of$100,000.00. 2. Diving services to install the hardware at an estimated cost of$100,000.00. 18. ALL DISTRICTS CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chair may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Boards take final actions on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v Penn Octane Corporation, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 790409(Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). 2. Confer with General Counsel regarding significant exposure to litigation, one potential matter(Government Code Section 54956.9[b][1]). 3. Confer with Districts' Negotiator re pending MOU Labor Negotiations, Government Code Section 54957.6. b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, I any, on matters considered in closed session 04/22/98 Page 7 of 7 19. Matters that a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 22. Adjournments _ NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications, Board Secretary; Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714)962.2411, ext. 7130 I H'.\wp.dta\agendaM9B Joint Board Agendas\042298.doc REVISED AGENDA — ITEM 14.d. AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING APRIL 22, 1998-7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. i In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the City of Seal Beach re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) Active Director Alternate Director George Brown Marilyn Bruce-Hastings' 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 04/22/98 Page 2 of 7 6. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager 1. Presentation by Stan Sprague (MWDOC) re CALFED Bay-Delta Program C. Report of General Counsel 7. EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 March 25, 1998 District 2 March 25 1998 District 3 March 25, 1998 District 5 March 25 1998 District 6 March 25, 1998 District 7 March 25 1998 District 11 March 25, 1998 District 13 March 25 1998 District 14 March 25 1998 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS 02/04/98 02/18/98 Joint Operating Fund $1,384,473.22 $1,848,475.73 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 234,297.75 306,096.54 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 21,016.69 District No. 1 28,438.12 1,838.45 District No. 2 13,707.68 0.00 District No. 3 468,301.13 3,500.03 District No. 5 4,461.73 0.00 District No. 6 0.00 0.00 District No. 7 48,727.20 0.00 District No. 11 1,628.89 0.00 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 0.00 TOTALS $2 184 035 72 $ 187 0 9 44 04/22/98 page 3 of 7 CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEM NOS. 9 - '10 ) All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: DISTRICT 2 9. Adopt Resolution No. 98-09-2, ordering Annexation No. 78—Joujon-Rouche Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2, .608 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim. DISTRICT 3 10. Adopt Resolution No. 98-10-3, approving Utility Agreement No. 12UT476 with Caltrans for reimbursement of design management, construction management, inspection and associated District costs for Modifications to Portions of Magnolia Relief Trunk and Orangethorpe Relief Trunk for 1-5 widening, (Segment E-2), Contract No. 3-37. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 11. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 04/22/98 Page 4 of 7 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re April 22, 1998 combined meeting of Steering Committee and Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan. b. DRAFfSTEERINGCOMMITTEEMINUTES-NOACTIONREQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 25, 1998 to be fled. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan re March 19, 1998 meeting. C. DRAFT AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN MINUTES-NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the meeting held on March 19, 1998 to be filed. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re April 1, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES-NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 1, 1998 to be filed. C. Authorize staff to enter into a Lease Agreement(Specification No. P-180)with Village Nurseries for 15 acres of land at the northern part of Plant No. 2 for a period of ten years. d. AMENDED MOTION: Approve agreement with E. I. Dupont de Nemours and Company for a 10-year program to provide Maintenance Painting Services at the treatment plants for an amount not to exceed $833,713.00 for the first year, cancelable at any time. e. Authorize a Temporary Discharge Agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District for the discharge of groundwater from the Irvine Community Development Company during the one-year dewatering constructions for Peters Canyon Wash Channel Improvement f. Award a 68-month professional services contract to Science Applications International Corporation to conduct the core monitoring portion of the Districts' newly issued ocean monitoring program (Specification No. P-179); and approve the proposed fixed-price amount of$984,638.00 for the first 20-month program segment. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re April 2, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES-NO ACTION REQUIRED(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held April 2, 1998 to be filed. 04/22/98 Page 5 of 7 ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 4) 15. c. Adopt a policy to allow the General Manager to approve construction change orders that include time extensions. d. Direct staff to discontinue working on the 65 kV Substation at Plant No. 1, Job No. 131-52. e. Approve increase in authorized funds for Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1 and Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-5, in the amount of$1,104,106.00 for Job No. J-34-1, for a total project total of $8,259,106.00 and in the amount of$229,632.00 for Job No. P2-35-5, for a total project total of$1,455,632.00, to cover all previous and anticipated costs required to complete construction. f. DISTRICT 3 Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer, Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R-1 with Mike Prfich &Sons authorizing an addition of $318,486.00 to the contract, and 67 calendar days; ratify Change Order No. 4 authorizing a deduction from the contract of$72,750.00; approve an increase to the budget in the amount of$258,479.00; and accept contract as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approve Final Closeout Agreement. 16. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re April 8, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 8, 1998 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 1998. d. Adopt Resolution No. 98-08, repealing Resolution No. 95-81 re Amended Deferred Compensation Program for Executive Management Group Employees and Management, Professional & Supervisory Employees, and amending Resolution No. 96-36 amending the Districts' Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual providing for repeal of the Deferred Compensation Program. 04/22/98 Page 6 of 7 ALL DISTRICTS 17. Authorize staff to solicit bids and award purchase orders for the following in regards to Miscellaneous Repairs to the 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Job No.J-39,for a total amount not to exceed$200,000.00: 1. Fabrication of hardware for permanently securing the 120-inch outfall end gate at an estimated cost of$100.000.00. 2. Diving services to install the hardware at an estimated cost of$100,000.00. 18. ALL DISTRICTS CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chair may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9. 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Boards take final actions on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v. Penn Octane Corporation, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 790409 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). 2. Confer with General Counsel regarding significant exposure to litigation, one potential matter(Government Code Section 54956.9[b][1ll. 3. Confer with Districts' Negotiator re pending MOU Labor Negotiations, Government Code Section 54957.6. b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in dosed session 04/22/98 Page 7 of 7 19. Matters that a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any SEE: SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA 22, Adjoumments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 Wadon\datal\wp.dla\agendaM98 Joint Board Agendas\042298 dad 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING MARCH 25, 1998 �\pNp�gZFIICTS Of09q'Y yQ2 � no G Z v a C:c7MME �. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Joint Board Meeting v 03/25/98 Page 2 of 8 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on March 25, 1998, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT 1 X Pet MCGui an Chair Thomas E.Lutz NO. 1 X James M.Fe an Chair ro tem Arthur Perry X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X Thomas R. Saharelli I I Jim Potts Todd Spitzer I X I William G.Steiner DISTRICT X Norman Z. Eckenrode Chair Michael L Maertzweiler NO.2 X Mark A. Murphy,Chair pro tem Joanne Coomz X Steve Anderson John Holmbe Don Bankhead X Jan Flory X Bruce A. Broadwater Mark Le es X John Collins Leurann Cook X Barry Danes Richard Freschi X Bumie Dunlap Glenn Parker A John Gulibrson Gene Wisner X Pat MaGui an Thomas E. Lutz Todd S itzer X William G. Steiner X Bob Zemel Tom Del DISTRICT Margie L. Rice Chair X James V. Evans NO. 3 X Eva Miner-Bradford Chair pro tem Paul F.Welker X Steve Anderson John Holmberg Don Bankhead X Jan Flory X Gecirge Brown Gwen Forsythe X John Collins Leurann Cook A Brian Donahue Harry M. Dotson X Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker X Mary Ann Jones Tom Carroll X Mark Le es Bruce A.Broadwater X Patsy Marshall I Jack Mauller X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz Todd Spitzer X William G.Steiner X Dave Sullivan Tom Harman X Charles E. Sylvia Ronald Bates X Bob Zemel Tom Dal DISTRICT X Jan Debay, Chair 1 John E.Noyes NO.6 1 John E.Noyes,Chair pro tem I X I Jan Deba X I William G. Steiner I I Todd Spitzer DISTRICT X I James M.Ferryman, Chair Arthur Perry NO. 6 X I William G. Steiner Chair pro tem it I Todd Spitzer X I Jan Debay I I Tom W.Thomson Minutes for Joint Board Meeting ' 03/25/98 V Page 3 of 8 ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT X Thomas R. Saaarelll Chair I Jim Potts NO. 7 X Christina Shea Chair protem I Barry Hammond X Jan Debay John E. Noyes X James M. Fe an Arthur Perry X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz X William G.Steiner Todd Spitzer DISTRICT Shirie Dettloff, Chair X Tom Hannan NO. 11 X Dave Sullivan, Chairpro tern I I Tom Harman Todd Spitzer I X I William G.Steiner DISTRICT X Burnie Dunlap,Chair Glenn Parker NO. 13 A John Gullizson Gene Wisner X Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz X I William G.Steiner I Todd Spitzer X I Bob Zemel I Tom Dal DISTRICT X Christina Shea Chair Barry Hammond NO.14 X Thomas R. Sallarelli,Chair pro tern Jim Polls X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X William G.Steiner I I Todd Spitzer X Peer A. Swan I I Darryl Miller STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Chris Dahl; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Bob Ooten; Mike Petennan; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy Wheatley OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Mary Lee; Phil Stone REPORT OF JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chairman reminded members of the Executive Committee that reservations were required if they planned to attend the CASA Spring Conference scheduled for April 30-May 2, 1998 at the Hyatt Newporter in Newport Beach. The Joint Chairman also reported that the April 2r Strategic Plan Workshop would be postponed until May 9". This workshop will be a comprehensive review of several elements of the Strategic Plan. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 03/25/98 Page 4 of 8 REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that the Board of Supervisors would be acting as the conducting authority for the consolidation protest hearing. This hearing is to be held on April 14. Mr. McIntyre then referred to a prop located in the Districts' parking lot which would be demonstrating water infiltration through sewer manhole lids and frames during a meeting with City Managers for the following day. He then acknowledged the Assistant General Manager who briefed the Directors on an item reported in the General Manager's letter regarding the Called process. A video on this process was shown and would be available through the Water Education Federation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts) There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 25, 1998, and the special meeting on February 19, 1998 for District No. 11, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Steve Anderson abstained. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS (All Districts) MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A'and"B°, attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below. ALL DISTRICTS 01/07/98 01/21/98 Joint Operating Fund $715,064.43 $776,887.65 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 221,525.68 1,649,499.33 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 10,645.89 District No. 1 0.00 0.00 District No. 2 0.00 43,392.93 District No. 3 203,727.40 32,954.37 District No. 5 0.00 0.00 District No. 6 0.00 0.00 District No. 7 0.00 12,499.17 District No. 11 0.00 0.00 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 11 140,317 51 $2 525,879 34 Director Mark Leyes abstained. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 03/25/98 y Page 5 of 8 CONSENT CALENDAR 9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD), City of Newport Beach, and Orange County Water District for Operation of Green Acres Project Intertie and Outfall Connection providing for ownership, operation of facility and reimbursement to the Districts from IRWD for pumping IRWD's unused reclaimed water through the Districts' outfall. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11.b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of Steering Committee, re the March 25, 1998 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Joint Sleenng/Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 25, 1998 to be filed. 12.b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the March 4, 1998 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 4, 1998 to be filed. 12.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve an agreement with Metropolitan Water District of Orange County(MWDOC)for a Multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program providing for installation of ultra-low flow toilets, shower heads and sink aerators, for an amount not to exceed$78,400 to be matched by MWDOC,with the balance to be funded by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, for a total program cost of $1,568,300.00. 12.d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve out-of-country travel by Moyasar Yahya to attend the International Symposium—Health Related Water Microbiology being held in Vancouver, BC Canada; and approve payment of registration fee and travel expenses for an estimated total amount of$2,317. Six nay votes were recorded. 13.1b. DRAFT PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the March 5, 1998 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 5, 1998 to be filed. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 03/25/98 Page 6 of 8 13.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-33-2 as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving final closeout agreement with Pascal & Ludwig. 13.d MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratty Change Order No. 5 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. 121-41; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-43; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P144; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.48; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2- 50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2; Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, with Margate Construction, Inc. authorizing an addition of$97,426.00 to the contract, and 26 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$8,792,085.00. 13.e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control System Upgrade at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, for a reduced amount of$312,067, decreasing the total amount of contract not to exceed $2,244,570. Director Mark Leyes abstained. 14.b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes, re the March 11,1998 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 11, 1998 to be filed. 14.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 1998. 14A. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. 98-07, approving Second Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees providing for compliance with the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (H.R. 3448). 14.e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to enter into a Lease Agreement with the County of Orange for installation of an 800MHz system at Plant No. 2 for a period of twenty (20) years. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 03/25/98 Page 7 of 8 14.f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file FY 1997/98 Joint Operating Legal Fees Update. 15. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to execute Change Order No. 3 to the contract for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) with Airpol Construction, Inc., providing for the purchase and installation of a new natural gas compressor skid package, for an amount not to exceed $295,000.00, and authorizing 444 calendar days for completion of additional work; and approve an increase in authorized funds of$295,OD0.00 for Job No. P1-51 (Rebid). DISTRICT NO. 2 16.a. A verbal report was presented by Director Norm Eckenrode, Chair of the Selection Committee, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the Selection Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 18, 1998 to be filed. 16.b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Selection Committee certification; approve Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver to prepare an alignment study and report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, in an amount not to exceed $199,077.00, and $55,000.00 expenditure to cover internal costs; approve a budget transfer from Contract No. 2-14- 5R2 in the amount of$4,603,692.00; and approve an additional budget of$7,260,308.00 for a total project budget of$11,864,000.00. DISTRICT NO. 7 17.a. A verbal report was presented by Director Thomas Saltarelli, Chair of the Selection Committee, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the Selection committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 5, 1998 to be filed. 17.b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Selection Committee certification; approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-27, for an amount not to exceed $105,619.00; and increase the budget allocation from $5,750,000.00 to $7,016,000.00. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 03/25/98 Page 8 of 8 ALL DISTRICTS 18.a. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (54956.91 (All Districts): The Boards convened in dosed session at 8:32 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item No. 18(a)(1) and (2). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with Caldomia Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item No. 18(a)(1) and (2). .b. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 8:58 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:58 p.m. Secretary of thk arp of Directors of County Sanita 'on D' cts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 ` H:tvp.dlalnBandatl 998 Joint Board M1nuiW0325B8.dMft.d. County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid O1/07/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 0778 Dell Marketing L.P. $25,245.54 Computers 0779 Edison Co. $55.047.71 Power 8780 Gierllch-Michell,Inc. $136,672.26 Pump Pans 8781 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. $135.226,80 Conshuction 3-38-3,2-R-97 8782 Pima Gro Systems Inc $200,194.44 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 8783 Tule RancNMagan Farms $56,367.26 Residuals Removal 8784 Waste Markets $46.603.65 Residuals Removal MO 3.27-96 8785 Woodruff,Spradlln B Smart $68.500.60 Legal Services MO 7.26-95 8786 American Telephone 6 Telegraph-Megacem $3.338.15 Long Distance Telephone Services 8787 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular OR BR $5.05 Long Distance Telephone Services 8788 American Telephone B Telegraph-Pro Wads $777.90 Long Distance Telephone Services 8789 Alt Liquids America Corporation $1.950.21 Specialty Gasses 6790 Air Products and Chemicals,Inc. $12.60 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen.Sysl.MO 6.8-89 8791 Allied Packing B Rubber Inc. $71.17 Plumbing Supplies 8792 Amedcen Airlines $6,564.14 Travel Services 8793 American DigBal Technologies 3641.12 On-Sfte Training 8794 Apple me Employment Service $110.40 Temporary Employment Services T 8796 Applied Industrial Technology $849.53 Pump Pans 8796 Arizona Instrument $1,299.47 Instrument Supplies 6797 Armor-Vac $705.00 Vacuum Truck Services Y 8788 Awmds 8 Trophies By Bea $30.28 Plaques I 8799 ACCU-Sludge $484.30 Lab Supplies 8800 AMAIReye Productivity Center $268.00 Seminar Registration 8801 Assoc of Memo.Severage Agencies $475.OD Conference Registration 8802 ASO Course Registration $920.00 Training Registration 8803 Salley Fischer 8 Power Company $208.42 Chlorination Supplies 8804 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $427.99 Printing MO 11-7-94 8805 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $5,590.39 Compuler Software 8806 BioMereux Vilek,Inc. $101.20 Lab Supplies 8807 Bureau Of Business Practice $216.20 Subscription 8808 C.P.I. $1,555.09 Lab Supplies 8809 C.S.U.F.Foundation $17.500.00 Develop Damogrephle Data 8 Support Bolo Cal-Glass,Inc. $193.42 Lab Supplies sell California Automatic Gale $790.32 Service Agreement 8812 Calhol,Inc. $203.30 Hardware 8813 Can Warren 6 Co. $151.65 Insurance Claims Administrator $614 Mark Castillo $1,154.69 Training Expense Relmb. 8815 Centrepolnte Commercial Interiors $973.15 Otflce Furniture 8816 Century Safety $81.35 Safety Supplies 8817 Cennet $20.00 Computer Services 8818 Cenanlum Alloys Company $257.72 Welding Supplies $819 City of Huntington Beach $10.915.11 Water Use 8820 City of Huntington Beach $270.00 Water Use 8821 Clayton Group SeMces,Inc. $1,714.50 Professional Services 8822 Cole-Partner Instrument Company $648.98 Lab Supplies 8823 Communications Performance Group $7,148.00 Professional Services 8824 Comp texpress and Scoff Mebust $1.726.20 Employee Computer Loan Program 8826 Compuserve Incorporated $1.162.03 Computer Services 8826 Computers America,Inc. $942.17 Computer Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Pak 01/07t98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8827 Connell GM Parts $44.07 Truck Pads 8828 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $13.387.19 Electric Pads 8829 Consolidated Reprographics $8.28 Printing Services $830 Contractors Equipment Co $1.463.76 Crane Rental $831 Cooper Cantered Corporation $153.95 Engine Parts 8832 Copelce Capital,Ina $1,432.00 Copier Lease 8833 Corporate Express $2.770.12 Office Supplies 8834 Crane Veyor Corp. $12.117.35 Crane System 6835 Creative Management Solutions $1,200.00 Professional Services 8836 Culligan Water $28.00 Sob Water Service 8837 CC[Technologies $1,690.00 Cable Installation 8838 CEM Corporation $991.54 Lab Supplies 8839 CS Company $13,140.26 Plumbing Supplies 8840 CSMFO 1998 Annual Seminar $150.00 Seminar Registration 8841 Dad Controls,Ina $1,526.94 Instrument Supplies 8842 DataCard Services $580.00 Equipment Repair u 8843 De Guelle 8 Sons Glass Co. $596.89 Safety Glass Z. 88" Delta Dental $247.21 Dental Insurance Plan c Bus Department of Pesticide Regulabon $25.00 Application Fee r am De2ulkk $170.40 Veins 8847 Diamond H Recognition $174.21 Service Awards 9 8848 Dickens Inc. $123.42 Electrical Pads N 8549 Dremel $42.29 Tools 8850 Dunn-Edwards Corporation $1,OW.28 Paint Supplies 8851 DME,Inc. $556.51 Compressor Parts 8652 EcoAnslysis,Inc. $3,077.50 Consulting Services 8853 Enchanter,Inc. $1,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 8854 Engineering News Record $79.74 Subscription 8855 Environmental Resources Association $1.339.40 Lab Services 8856 EEI Publkstkn Orders $0.00 Publication 8857 EMED $648.41 Electrical Parts 8858 ENS Resources,Inc. $2.731.13 Professional Services 8859 Federal Express $595.36 Air Freight 8860 Filter Supply Company $7.467.03 Filters $861 Finnigan Corp $998.60 Service Agreement 8862 Fla-Systems,Inc. $9,959.65 Pump Parts 8863 Fortis Bene(ds Insurance Company $8,485.40 Disability Insurance Premiums-Doc 97 8864 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $349.26 Paint Supplies 8865 Franklin Quest Co $211.64 Office Supplies 8866 Fry's Electronics $5,295.31 Electronic B Computer Supplies 8867 Full Spectrum Analytica,Inc. $4.485.73 Equipment Repair 8868 GarraS-Callahan Company $1,810.20 Chemicals 8869 The Gas Company $58.67 Natural Gas 8870 Gates Fiberglass Installers $7,018.76 Air Ducts 8871 Genaral Petroleum $8,689.45 Unleaded Gasoline 8872 GTE California $8.548.48 Telephone Senses 8873 Graphic D"obibuMn $310.68 Photographic Supplies 8874 Granby STl $I,OD534 Engine Parts 8875 Great American Printing Cc $337.52 Printing Services .a County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County c , Claims Paid D1107198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8876 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $129.30 Janitorial Supplies 8877 EST,Inc./Micro City $20.187.04 Computers 8678 Harold Primrose ice $96.00 Ice For Samples 8879 Hatch&Kirk Inc. $5.003.88 Truck Pads 8880 Hill Direct,Inc. $224.62 Telephone Equipment 8881 Herb's Slackforest Bakery&Deli $123.05 Directors Meeting Expense 8882 Home Depot $92.14 Small Hardware 8883 Hach Company $4,145.06 Lab Supplies 8884 Imaging Plus,Inc. $953.15 Office Supplies 8885 Industrial Steam $352.99 Pumps 8886 Industrial Threaded Products $23.71 Connectors 8887 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $224.81 Truck Parts 8888 Ism,Inc $824.29 Instrument Supplies 8889 J&W Scientific $130.75 Flowmeter Service 8890 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $453.76 Instrument Parts 8691 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Co. $5.133.15 Software License Fees NO 7-2F96 8892 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $1.400.00 Construction Services % 8893 Jay's Catering $1.736.85 Directors Meeting Expense 8894 Johnstone Supply $272.17 Electric Parts 8895 J2 Printing Services $753A7 Printing " 8896 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan $22.208.95 Medical Insu mince Premium 8697 Keith D Stolzenbach,PRO.,P. $1.950.00 Oman Monitoring 'j 8898 Kelly Paper $958.38 Paper k" 8899 Kewaunee Scientific Corporation $1,050.00 Workbench 8900 Knox Industrial Supplies $1,362.52 Tools 8901 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company $1.428.56 Cellular Telephone Service 8902 Lab Support $1,691.13 Temporary Employment Services $903 Laidlaw Environmental Svc,; $2.012.50 Hazardous Material Disposal 89" Lakewood Publications $79.00 Subscription 8905 LaserAll Corporation $874.48 Printer Repairs 8906 Loutzenhlsees Stationary $255.78 Office Supplies 8907 LaMothe Company $615.00 Lab Services 8908 Liebert Corporation $465.02 Truck Parts 8909 Liquid Handling Systems $68.82 Pump Pads 8910 LA Cellular Telephone Company $2,447.51 Cellular Telephone Servim 8911 Managemenl Health Services,Inc. $3.220.00 Pre-Employment Physicals 8912 Mar Vac Electronics $94,74 Instrument Supplies 8913 No Junkin Corp $422.59 Plumbing Supplies 8914 McKenna&Cuneo,L.L.P. $450.00 Pump Pads 8915 McMaster-Can Supply Co. $362.48 Tools 8916 Metier,Inc $9,150A0 Consulting SeMces 8917 Mum $200.00 Engineering Services 8918 Mission Uniform Service $1,54844 Uniform Rentals 8919 Mitchell Repair Information Co $163.79 Publication 8920 Mutual Propane $80.62 Propane 8921 MPS Photographic Services,Inc $75.45 Photographic Selvims 8922 N.Glantz&Son $565.69 Small Hardware 8923 Nat West Markets $750 d0 COP Interest Draw Fees 8924 National Business Womens Leadership Assoc. $69.00 Seminar Registration County Sanilallon Districts Of Orange County Claims Palo O1/07198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8925 National Notary Association $13400 Workshop Registration 8926 National Plant Services,Inc. $7.887.50 Vacuum Trull Services 8927 National Technology Transfer $595.00 Seminar Registration 8928 Neal Supply Cc $9111 Plumbing Supplies 8929 New Horizons Computer Leaming $899.00 Software Training Classes 8930 City of Newport Beach $53.07 Water Use 8931 Nwalynx System Inc $10,341.15 Software 8932 Office PaNllion $1,307.74 Office Supplies 8933 Orange County Foram $50.00 Meeting Registration 8934 Orange County Wholesale Electric $4,320.68 Instrument Supplies 8935 ONz Fire Protected $425.00 Service Agreement 8936 Oxygen Service Company $304.21 Specialty Gases 8937 Pacific Bell $1,165.83 Telephone Services 8938 Pacific Mechanical Supply $168.09 Plumbing Supplies 8939 Patlre Janitorial Supplies $4,084.85 Janitorial Supplies 8940 Pagenet $535.03 Rental Equipment 8941 Parts Unlimited $578.74 Truck Parts 8942 Peerless Wiping Materials Co. $721.93 Shop Supplies r 8943 Pelce Animal Supplies $83.03 Lab Supplies a 8944 Political Pulse $95.00 Subscription 8945 Poty Enterprises Inc., $347.49 Road Cones > 8946 Presidium Inc $2.063.33 Workers Comp Claims Admin. 1 8947 Public Risk Management Assoc. $220.00 Membership 8948 Pumping Solutions Inc. $99.04 Mechanical Supplies 8949 PSOC Pool Supply of Orange County $32.97 Operating Supplies 8950 Red Wing Shoes $442.20 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 8951 Reliastar $19.226.31 Life Insurance Premium 8952 Rellaslar Bankers Security Life Ins. $4,830.08 Life Insurance Premium 8953 Remedy $9,950.93 Temporary Employment Services 8954 Roma Sales Company,Inc. $253.21 Equipment Repair 8955 Ryan Harm Products Corp. $234.56 Metal 8956 Schre nit America, Inc. $287.92 Pump Pads 8957 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $672.87 Specialty Gases 8958 Son.Reilly B Whitehead $448.39 Legal Services-Personnel Services 8959 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. $355.00 Lab Repairs 8960 Sean $92.43 Tools B Supplies 8961 Secretary of Slate $100.00 Consolidation Filing Fee Fine 8962 Sansone, $440.49 Electric Pads 8963 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc, $856.59 Tools 8964 Shunsucik Sales B Engineering $1,978.46 Tools/Hardware $965 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. $1.211.58 Safety Supplies 89W Southern Celifamla Water $108.71 Water Use 8967 Sperling Instrument Co.,Inc. $139.58 Maier 8968 Sprint $35.55 Long Distance Telephone Services 8969 SlateNet $165.00 Maintenance Contract 8970 Sterling Ad $99.59 Ad Supplies 8971 Douglas M.Stead $149.00 Seminar Registration Relmb. 8972 Summit Steel $2,130.71 Metal 8973 Sunset Ford $395.91 Truck Pads � 1 County Sanftallon Districts Of Orange County Clalm Paid 01/07198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8974 Taylor-Dunn $85.85 Electric Cad Peck 8975 The Holman Group $773.90 EAP Pmmlum 8976 The Olfloe Of Conferences B Training $395.00 Conlerence Registration 8977 The Register 5803.60 Notices&Ads 8978 Time Warner Communications $40.47 Cable Services 8979 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $588.62 Truck Parts 8980 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 57,059.18 Truck Parts 8981 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 580.00 Lab Services 8982 Ultra Scientific $564.00 Lab Supplies 8983 Unlco Consulting Engineers 54,990.00 Professional Services 8984 ULI-the Urban Lend Institute $34.95 Publication 8985 Valley Cities Supply Company $51.05 Plumbing Supplies 8906 Valley Splicing Co. $800.00 Equipment Repair 8987 Vadax $533.37 Office Furniture 8988 VWR Scientific Products 54,015.30 Lab Supplies 8989 Wayne Electric Co. $297.64 Electric Supplies 8990 Wesco Dlsidb8lon Inc. $22.79 Instrument Supplies n 8991 Western Stales Chemical Inc. $14.607.94 Caustic Soda MO8-23.95 y 8992 Wilder Software Seminars $298.00 Conference Registration 8993 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $2.035.00 Professional Services n 8994 WEF Membership $107.00 Membership 8995 Xerox Corporation $1,525.29 Copier Leases 8996 Janke Debey 9490.00 Conference Registration 8997 Danny S.Evangelista E480.00 Publications&Training Supplies Reimb. 6998 Donald F.McIntyre $59.92 Cellular Phone Exp.Reimb. 8999 Dawn M.Md0nley $122.16 Training Registration Reimb. 9000 Fred J.O'Brien $191.98 Training Registration Reimb. 9001 Carolyn L.Thompson $360.51 Office Supplies Reimb. 9002 National Notary Association $72.00 Workshop Registration 9003 The Norm Companies $198.00 Mall Delivery Service Total Claims Peck 01/07/98 $1.140,317.51 Summary Amount District No.3 $203.727.40 CORF $221,52568 Joint Operations $715,064.43 $1,140,317.51 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 01/21/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9034 County of Orange $100,000.00 Sewer Line Relocation 9035 GST,Inc/Micro City $68,517.17 Computers 9036 J.D.Edwards World Solutions $59,033.35 Software License Fees NO 7.24-96 9037 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. $47,164.55 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 9038 Pima Oro Systems Inc $99,194.38 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 9039 Southern California Edison $31.099.80 Power 9040 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms $53,750.22 Residuals Removal 9041 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $67,774.77 Hydrogen Peroxide Spednca0on No,C-044 9042 Advance Constructors Inc $160.319.70 Construction J-34-1,P2-35-5 9043 Anpct Construction,Inc. $137.657.19 Construction PI-51R 9044 Margate Construction Inc. $839,540.46 Construction PI-41,P143 9045 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $6.97 Long Distance Telephone Services 9046 A-Adams Locksmith School of Lock Tech. $6,067.86 Training Registration 9047 A-Plus Systems $2.588.55 Notices&Ad. 9048 American Management Association $8,400.00 Training Registration 9049 American Management Association $1,295.00 Training Registration 905D Amedpec,Inc. $22,223.86 Reconciliation User Refund 9051 Applied Industrial Technology $3.134.97 Pump Pads r9052 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting $235.00 Lab Supplies 9053 Asbury Environmental Services $35.00 Waste Oil Removal I„ 9064 Associated Ready Mixed Concrete $339.14 Concrete 9055 Acoustic Standards,Inc $4,768.65 Acoustical Materials m 9056 ACT Group Inc. $300.00 Service Agreement :.. 9057 Assoc of Metro Sewerage Agencies $475.00 Conference Registration 9058 Bank of America $321.02 Bank Service Fees 9059 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $350.00 Telephone Installation 9060 BlaMedeux Verk,Inc. $736.14 Lab Supplies 9061 Black Box Corporation $37.40 Computer Parts 9082 Bloomberg L.P. $4,994.21 Financial Monitoring MO 4-14.93 9D03 Jeffrey Brown $250.00 Travel Expenses 9064 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $3,085.00 Janitorial Services MO 1.12-94 9065 Cel-0Iass,Inc. $1.346.89 Lab Supplies 9066 Cegrol,Inc $227.51 Hardware W67 Came;Corporation $19,500.00 Fiber Optic Cable 9058 Cad Warren&Co. $863.33 Insurance Claims Administrator 9069 Carter Co.Truck&Automotive $155.67 Truck Pads 9070 Centrepolnte Commercial Interiors $395.10 Office Furniture 9071 City of Huntington Beach $22.93 Water Use 9072 Computers America,Inc. $3,966.49 Computer Supplies 9073 James Cong $109.45 Training Expense Relmb. 9074 Connell Chevrolet/CEO $23,449.64 Truck Pans 9075 Consolkleled Electrical Distributors $5,780.13 Electric Pans 9076 Conveyor Components Co $873.07 Electric Pans 9077 Cooper Cameron Corporation $2.018.66 Engine Parts 9078 Corporate Express $1,382.94 Office Supplies 9079 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $170.29 Truck Pads 9080 County of Orange-Auditor Controller $4.840.00 Underground Tank Fee 9091 County Sanitation Districts of OC $10,645.09 Workers Comp Relmb. 9082 County Sanitation Districts of OC $2,678.00 Medicare Tax Deduction E •, County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 0112 V98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9083 County Wholesale Electric Co. $3,148.95 Elecidc Parts 9084 CCI Technologies $155.20 Work Station Installation 9085 CJ International $167.00 Publication 9086 Creative Power Management $3.500.00 Consulting Services 9087 CS Company $3.546.76 Plumbing Supplies 9088 Dell Marketing L.P. $10,133.15 Computers 9089 DeZudck $716.03 Valves 9090 Diamond H Rocognition $83.38 Service Awards 9091 Duno-Edwards Corporation 5272.66 Paint Supplies 9092 Duthie Generator Service,Inc. $6.300.00 Equipment Rental 9093 Eagle Distribution $265.10 Electric Can Pads 9094 EcoAnalysis,Inc. $8,150.00 Consulting Services 9095 Edison Co. $6,557.07 Power 9096 Electra Bond.Inc. $3,340.25 Mechanical Parts 9097 Electro-Tesl,Inc. $2,175.00 Electrical Supplies 9098 Enchanter,Inc. $700.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 9099 Environmental Law Institute 520.00 Publication 9100 ESP Industries $557.47 Mechanical Supplies H. 9101 Federal Express $196.50 Air Freight µ 9102 Balley-Fischer&Pouter Co. $573.18 Chlorination Supplies n 9103 Fisher Scientific $362.26 Lab Supplies to 9104 Flickinger Company $215.00 Plumbing Supplies ry 9105 Flo-Systems,Inc. $12,554.02 Pump Parts BIOS Fountain Valley Camera $110.99 Photo Supplies 9107 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $657.67 Paint Supplies 9108 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash $198.00 Truck Wash Tickets 9109 The Foxboro Company $2,203.10 Electrical Supplies 9110 Franklin Covey $355.99 Office Supplies 9111 Franklin Ouest Co. $62.09 Office Supplies 9112 Fys Electronics $2.475.73 Electronic&Computer Supplies 9113 Ganahl Lumber Company $1.535.56 Lumber I Hardware 9114 The Gas Company $12.574.54 Natural Gas 9115 Gateway Medical Center $1,085.00 Pm-Employment Physicals 9116 George T.Hell Co. $1,091.02 Electric Pads 9117 WW Grainger Inc. $264.00 Compressor Pads 9118 Hach Company $1,885.55 Lab Supplies 9119 Hamngton Industrial Plastics $320.90 Plumbing Supplies 9120 Pinnacle One $911.00 Consulting Services 9121 Hill l Inc $575.68 Tools 9122 Linda L.Holmes $718.75 Heading Officer 9123 Hama Depot $92.04 Small Hardware 9124 Horiba Instruments Inc $681.53 Instrument Supplies 9125 Hub Auto Supply $66.27 Truck Pads 9126 Imaging Plus,Inc. $486.01 Office Supplies 9127 Institute for Applied Management $2,853.44 Training Video 9128 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $2.90 Water Use 9129 IBM $324.00 Service Cunlrect 9130 IDEXX Distribution Corp. $101.80 Lab Supplies 9131 IPCO Safety-Ca $238.37 Safety Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 012 V98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9132 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. $1,354.87 Instrument Supplies 9133 J.P.Morgan Securities E22.785.75 COP Remarketing Agreement 9134 Jays Catering $178.39 Dhectors'Meeting Expense 9135 Johnstone Supply $213.60 Electric Parts 9136 N.P.Lindstrom $5,523.76 Envit.Consulting Services P7-38,J33 9137 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan $22,208.95 Medical Insurance Premium 9138 Kelar Cory $5,BB0.45 Training Materials 9139 Knox Industrial Supplies $714.70 Tools 9140 Lawrence Ragan Communications $89.00 Subscription 9141 League Of California Cities $50.00 Publication 9142 LA Cellular Telephone Company $452.47 Cellular Telephone Service 9143 M.E.Canfield Co. $3,100.00 Safety Training 9144 MacOonaldStephens Engineers,Inc. $22,478.82 Engineering Services 2-37 9145 Maintenance Technology Corp. $74.17 Mechanical Parts 9146 Mar Vac Electronics $397.78 Instrument Supplies 9147 Margate Construction,Inc. $1.200.00 Temporary Bracing 9148 Medlin Controls Co. $784.56 Instrument Supplies 9149 Mesa Energy Systems,Inc. $277.00 Electrical Parts T 9150 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co $5,205.90 Mechanical Repairs 9161 Mission Uniform Servka $4.901.51 Uniform Rentals I'P 9152 Monitor Labs Inc $2252.49 Instrument Supplies 9153 Morton Sett $549.63 Saft m 9154 Motion Industries $1,135.62 Pump Parts w 9155 MotoPholo $44.53 Photographic Services 9156 Mine Safety Appliances Company $10.42 Instrument Supplies 9157 Nat West Markets $750.00 Interest Draw Fees 9158 National Audio-Msual Supply $347.46 Office Supplies 9169 National Technology Transfer $2,770.00 Training Registration 9160 Neal Supply Co $980.20 Plumbing Supplies 9161 New Horizons Computer Learning $2,598.00 Software Training Classes 9162 Newark Electronics $2.155.69 Instrument Supplies 9163 Nodab $46220 Chemicals 9164 NAGDCA $400.00 Membership 9165 Office Depot Business Services $3,401.97 Office Supplies 9156 The Ohmam Corporation $489.19 Electrical Parts 9167 Orange County Wholesale Electric $3,194.01 Instrument Supplies 9168 Orange Valle 8 Filing Company $253.82 Fittings 9169 Orion Research,Inc. $198.75 Lab Supplies 9170 Oxygen Service Company $3,006.94 Specialty Gases 9171 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. $933.48 Electric Supplies 9172 Pacific Bell $232.41 Telephone Services 9173 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. $22.987.02 Instrument Parts 9174 Pacific Talk $11,904.25 Mechanical Pads 9176 Pagenet $1,435.08 Rental Equipment 9176 Parker Diving Services,Inc $8.848.90 Bid Guarantee Refund 9177 Pads Unlimited $57.68 Truck Paris 9178 PaMct Video Productions $945.84 Training Videos 9179 Pelce Animal Supplies $32.28 Lab Supplies 9180 Power Generation Consulting $630.00 Consulting Services eo County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County u , Claims Pald 01/21/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9181 Power Systems Testing Company $222.58 Generator Repair 9182 Pumping Solutions Inc. $125.19 Mechanical Pads 9183 R.F.MacDonald Co. $283.87 Pump Pads 9184 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2.160.05 Trash Removal 9165 Ralnin Instrument Go.,Inc. $962.11 lab Supplies 9186 Red Valve Company,Incorporated $1.277.92 Mechanical Pads 9187 Roberlo's Auto Trim Shop $127.71 Auto Repair 9188 Rome Sales Company,Inca $253.21 Pump Parts 9189 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. $190.00 Engineering Support Services 9190 RPM Electric Molars $6,157.84 Electric Motor Parts 9191 Santa Ana Electric Motors $415.64 Electric Pads 9192 Schwmg America,Inc $91.47 Pump Pads 9193 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $2.813.49 Specialty Gases 9194 Second-Sun $558.17 Light Fidures 9195 Secretary of Slate $72.00 Workshop Registration 9196 Sale Products Cc $181.90 Meter Connector 9197 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $537.71 Tools 9198 Shlmadzu Scientific Instrument 520,762.14 Lab Equipment µ 9199 Siemon,Lareen&Marsh $16.000.00 Legal Services c 9200 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. $151.10 Lab Supplies 9201 SklllPath Seminars $1,185.00 Training Registration 9202 Sludge Newsletter $697.00 Subscription r9203 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. $185.56 Plumbing Supplies 9204 South Coast Water $125.00 Lab Supplies 9205 Spes Ceriprep Inc. $998.26 Lab Supplies 9206 State Board Of Equalization $449.59 Underground Petroleum Storage Fee 9207 Sundlpse,Inc. $20.494.11 Reconciliation User Refund 9208 Superintendent of Documents $19.00 Publication 9209 SARBS-PDC $2,000.00 Seminar Registration 9210 The Holman Group $768.22 EAP Premium Jan 98 9211 The Register $619.85 Notion&Ads 9212 Thompson Industrial Supply.Inc. $786.16 Mechanical Pads 9213 Time Warner Communication $40.47 Cable Services 9214 Tony Demaria Electric $793.00 Equipment Repair 9215 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service 8 S $97.11 Locks 8 Keys 9216 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. $7,947.66 Contract Groundskeeping MO&11-94 9217 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. $32.01 Tmdc Pads 9218 Truck Paris Supply 8 etc. $310.16 Truck Pads 9219 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $794.00 Lab Services 9220 U.S.Fllter/Zimpro,Inc. $3,623.75 Equipment Rental 9221 U.S.Shop Tools $339.41 Tools 9222 The Unisource Corporation $1.180.86 Office Supplies 9223 United Education Centers,Inc. $1.525.00 Software 9224 United Parcel Service $114.45 Parcel Services 9225 Valley Cities Supply Company $227.44 Plumbing Supplies 9226 The Ventage Group $10,385.00 Consulting Services 9227 Vector Resources $3,955.20 Instrument Parts 9228 Village Nurseries $103.44 Landscaping Supplies - 9229 Vision Service Plan-(CA) $7.905.70 Vision Service Premium County Sanitation Districts Of Orango County Claims Paid OV21198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9230 VWR Scientific Products $4.820.04 Lab Supplies 9231 W.D.Proud Company $159.28 Reconciliation User Refund 9232 Water Environment Federation $605.00 Seminar Registration 9233 Western Slates Chemical Inc. $7,156.12 Caustic Soda MO 8-23.95 9234 Worldwalch Institute $23.90 Publication 9235 Xerox Corporation $11.000.67 Copier Leases 9238 Xerox Corporation $9,936.58 Copiert-eases 9237 Sverdrup CNII,Inc. $9.540.73 Construction P2-35-3,P246,PI-38-5,P2-55 9238 Michelle Tuchman $20.65 Expense Relmb. 9239 Frankle J.Woodside $136.94 Software Reanb. 9240 Best Buy and Debbie Marcheglano $1,925.53 Employee Computer Loan Program 9241 Comin express and Mitchell Tdvanovlch $1,300.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 9242 County of Orange $2.970.00 Administrative Fees 9243 County Sanitation District of OC 61,674.74 Petty Cash Rehab. 92" Charles E.Frey $2.053.88 Employee Computer Loan Program 9245 991&HW-CWEA,Inc. $2,700.00 Conference Registration 9246 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $2.13 Long Distance Telephone Services 9247 Boyle Engineering Corporation $1.698.06 Engineering Services 3.38 �- 9248 Dalavauft $94.00 Ciliate Back-Up Tape Storage Q 9249 DGA Consultants,Inc. $2.940.00 Engineering Services 3.38-3 9250 GTE Colifomle $5.365.61 Telephone Services n � 9257 GE Motors 8industrial Systems E71,617.@ Engineering Services I 9252 Holmes B Narver Inc $4.679.12 Engineering Services 9253 Moodys Inveatofs Service $6,000.00 Annual Fee 9264 Oxygen Service Company $1.790.96 Specialty Gases 9255 Pacific Ball Internet Services $1.151.50 Internet Services 9256 Sancen Engineering,Inc. $8.900.00 Engineering Services 9257 Schanck Trebel $1.058.33 Freight 9258 Shureluck Sales B Engineering &500.80 Tools/Hardware 9259 Smilh-Emery Company $17.732.63 Soil Testing MO 7.13-94 9260 Valley Cities Supply Company $274.37 Plumbing Supplies 9261 Valley C0les Supply Company $11.50 Plumbing Supplies 9262 Xerox Corporation $403.93 Copier Leases 9263 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $176.419.00 Engineering Services 11-18 9264 Orange County Water District $40.368.00 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 Total Claims Paid 01/21/98 $2.525.879.34 Summery Amount District No.2 $43,392.93 DIsMq No.3 $32,954.37 Dlsi tNo.7 $12,499.17 CORF $1.649.499.33 Se8 Insurance Funds $10.645.89 JOInt Operations $776,867.65 $2.526.879.34 en S H O' Ih rt N JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meetmg Date ro) Btl 04/22/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Number It ter County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Ross H. Tipps, Senior Accounting Clerk SUBJECT: Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts by Roll Call Vote. (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each district represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Staff recommends ratification of payment of claims in accordance with the attached check listing. SUMMARY See attached check listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES ROry.��Ra F—. RabN. ,rya, Page 1 N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Copies of Claims Paid reports from 02/04/98 and 02118/98. X."rp.WYVpffi pKar1 Fmn.M Page 2 County Sanitaton Mounds Of Orange County Claims Paid 02/04/98 Check No, Vendor Amount Description 9288 Dell Marketing L.P. $72,057.68 Computers 9289 Delta Dental $36,331.76 Dental Insurance Plan 9290 Edison Co. $54,523.92 Power 9291 Graybar Electric Company $36,100.55 Electrical Cabinet 9292 GST,Inc/Micro City $80,422.90 Computer Hardware 9293 Keroiron Pae18c Inc $112,891.55 Ferric Clodde MO 9-27.95 9294 Metre Health Acct Financial $390,073.60 Medied Insurance Premium 9295 Mladen Buntich Construction Cc $465,256.70 Construction 3.35J,2-R-97 9296 Orange County Water District $36.055.76 Consulting Services 9297 Pacific Paris and Controls,Inc. $25,197.32 Instrument Parts 9298 PadBeare of Co $36,996.94 Medlacl Insurance Premium 9299 Pima On,Systems Inc $104,834.33 Residuals Removal M03-M95 9300 Science Applications Intl.,Cc $39,306.13 Ocean Monitoring MO 641-94 9301 Sverdrup Civil,Inc $47,141.60 Construction 7-7-1 9302 Tule Ranch/Magan Fars $66,610.65 Residuals Removal 9303 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smelt $71,535.10 Legal Sewleas MO 7-26-95 93N A&A Debuning and Tumbling $69.75 Reconciliation User Refund 9305 American Telephone&Telegraph-Magacom $2,427.73 Long Distance Telephone Services 9306 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $4.90 Long Distance Telephone Services 9307 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $804.83 Long Distance Telephone Services 9308 A-PI..Systems $810.16 Notices&Ads 9309 Accident Photo Pak $2,370.50 Risk Management Photo Supplies 9310 Advanced Manufacturing Inst4ute $3.576.00 Training Regl3betion 9311 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. $14,869.50 Manhole Frames&Covers 9312 Allied Supply Co. $407.86 Mechanical Pads 9313 American Airlines $3,218.61 Travel Services 9314 American Society for Microbiology $330.00 Conference Registration 9315 Analysis,Inc. $1,657.79 Testing Kits 9316 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $395.00 Service Agreement 9317 Appleone Employment Service $10,755.72 Temporary Employment Services 9318 Applied Industrial Technology $4.052.99 Pump Parts 9319 Arrs Disposal Service,Inc. $620.80 Toxic Waste Removal 9320 Awards&Trophies By Bea $76.71 Plaques 9321 Amu Standard $266.99 Lab Supplies 9322 ASL Consulting Engineers $3,757.00 Consulting Services 9323 AWSI $159.00 D.O.T.Training Program 9324 Balboa Pavilion $218.93 Recondllmion User Refund 9325 Bell Oil Company $358.44 Reconciliation User Refund 9326 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $3,603.89 Printing MO 11-7-94 9327 Bank of America $304.18 Banking Services 9328 Battery Spedagas $346.21 Batteries 9329 Beach Paving Inc $1.235.00 Asphalt Repair 9330 Ball Pipe&Supply Co. $507.00 Plumbing Supplies 9331 Blair-Madin Co.,Inc. $407.30 Valve Manifolds 9332 Thomas M.Stands $815.11 Training Expense Reimb. 9333 Boeing North American $1,432.55 Reconciliation User Refund 9334 Boyle Engineering Corporation $5,145.19 Engineering Services 7-7-1 9335 Brown And Caldwell $831.40 Engineering Services Rea 93-101 9336 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $4,545.00 Jan fodal Services M01-12-94 County Sanitation DisMcis Of Orange County Claims Paid 02/04/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9337 Bureau Of Business Practice $276.32 Publication 9338 Burlington Engineering,Inc. $184.36 Permit Refund 9339 Burrows Ind./Minuteman $1.669.82 Reconciliation User Refund 9340 BI Technologies $832.13 Reconciliation User Refund 9341 C.G.McArthur Enterprises,Inc. $98.00 Newport Spill Claim 9342 California Environmental Controls $651.25 Mechanical Parts 9343 Cale Camera $176.44 Photographic Supplies 9344 Canus Corporation $22,153.23 Fiber Optic Cable 9345 Care Enterprises West $483.63 Reconciliation User Refund 9346 Carollo Engineers $477.76 Engineering Services 9347 Century Paint $587.75 Paint Supplies 9348 Charles P.Crowley Co. $1,276.80 Instrument Parts 9349 City of Fountain Valley $11,625.84 Water Use 9350 City of Huntington Beach $10,941.98 Water Use 9351 The City Associates,Inc. $562.50 Hearing Officer Services 9352 Cale-Pamrer Instrument Company 5386.40 Lab Supplies 9353 Communication Briefings $79.00 Subscription 9354 Communications Performance Group $10.833.00 Professional Services 9355 Compucom $11.077.20 Service Agreement 9356 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $7,253.57 Electric Parts 9357 Consolidated Plastics Company $54.99 Plumbing Supplies 9358 Converse Consultants $6.656.40 Engineering Services P265 9359 Cook Brothers $2,094.66 Pump Paris 9360 Cooper Energy Services $2,700.00 Engine Parts 9361 Copelco capital,Inc. $1,432.00 Copier Lease 9362 County of Orange $630.00 Permit Fees 9363 County Wholesale Electric Co. $72.84 Electric Parts 9364 Crest Coatings#2 $541.53 Reconciliation User Refund 9355 Centre Corporation $402.90 Fiber Optic Cable 9366 CS Company $1,758.09 Plumbing Supplies 9367 CWEA 1998 SRSS $50.00 Training Registration 9368 Danco Metal Surfacing $1,096.96 Reconciliation User Refund 9369 Del Mar Analytical $2.358.00 Biosolids Analysis 9370 Oct $1.195.00 Training Registration 9371 Eastman Center $216.75 Reconciliation User Refund 9372 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. $1.130.00 Medical Screening 9373 Edwards Systems Technology $1.462.50 Service Agreement 9374 Electra Bond,Inc $3.717.38 Equipment Repair 9375 Enchanter, Inc. $4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 9376 Environmental Resources Association $1,342.W Lab Services 9377 Etec Company $502.37 Values 9378 ENS Resources Inc. $2,053.33 Professional Services 9379 ESP Industries $387.67 Mechanical Supplies 9380 Federal Express $30.25 Air Freight 9381 Fibedron $290.36 Fiber Optic Cable 9382 Fisher Scientific $2,693.73 Lab Supplies 9383 Flo-Systems,Inc. $1,103.75 Pump Parts 9384 Rome.Products,Inc. $1,371.56 Valve Parts 9385 Fluid Tech.A Div.of FUN Inc. $503.78 Instrument Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County C' Clalms Paid OW04198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9386 Forlis Benefits Insurance Company $17.939.19 Disability Insurance Premium 9387 Fountain Valley Camara $38.31 Photo Supplies 9388 Fountain Valley Florist $53.88 Flowers-Senevolonm 9389 Fountain Valley Points,Inc. $13.31 Paint Supplies 9390 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash $210.50 Track Wash Tickets 9391 The Foxboro Company $10.43 Freight 9392 Franklin Covey $1,395.18 Office Supplies 9393 Franklin Quest $16.63 Office Supplies 9394 Franklin Quest Co $86.06 Office Supplies 9395 Franklin Quest Co. $179.15 Office Supplies 9396 Fry's Electronim $1,851.77 Electronic B Computer Supplies 9397 FLW,Inc. $50.00 Training Registration 9398 The Gas Company $6,694.64 Natural Gas 9399 Gates Fiberglass Installers $1.357.75 Unistrul Installation 9400 G.E.Supply Company $1,211.36 Electric Parts 9401 General Oceania Inc $797.62 Lab Services 9402 GTE California $2,000.89 Telephone Services 9403 George Yardley Co. $231.49 Lab Supplies 9404 Gelinge Castle $256.56 Repair Kits U05 Gierlich-Mitchell,Inc. $4,432.67 Pump Parts 9406 Glen and Pam Hubbard $3,415.86 Split Claim 9407 Gold...ast Window Service $1.668.00 Window Cleaning Service 9408 WAN Grainger Inc. $80.81 Compressor Parts 9409 Graphic Distributors $181.02 Photographic Supplies 9410 Great American Printing Co $236.54 Printing 9411 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $389.97 Janitorial Supplies 9412 Grath Corpodallon $8,783.66 Flame Arrester W13 Hooker Equipment Company $110.32 Truck Pads 9414 Hach Company $96.12 Lab Supplies 9415 Harrington Industrial Plastics $329.51 Plumbing Supplies 9416 P.L. Hawn $341.50 Eladdc Supplies 9417 Hoeibiger Service Inc $120.05 Compressor Pads 9418 Home Depot $332.62 Small Hardware 9419 Hub Auto Supply $142.30 Truck Parts 9420 HS Digital Ads&HB Blueprint $316.79 Printing 9421 HWA Sales,Inc. $3,255.69 Electrical Pads 9422 Imperial Plating $309.64 Remnctliation User Refund 9423 Industrial Threaded Products $2.218.14 Connectors 9424 Inland Empire Equipment,Inc $233.93 Truck Pads 9425 Interstate Battery Systems $2.116.58 Batteries 9426 Irvine Ranch Water Dialects $49.46 Water Use 9427 Ism,Inc $173.09 Instrument Supplies 9428 IPCO Safety-Ca $2,071.83 Safety Supplies 9429 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $1.653.62 Instrument Supplies 9430 James M.Evans $645.40 Professional Services 9431 Jay's Catering $sfifim Directors'Meeting Expense 9432 Jim's Suspension Service $265.00 Track Repairs 9433 Johnstone Supply $708.81 Electric Pads 94M Keith D Sloleenbach,PH.D. $1,050.00 Oman Monitoring County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Psld 02/04M Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9435 Kelly Papa, $696.94 Paper 9436 Kirk Express $105.01 Paper 9437 Knox Industrial Supplies $4.540.65 Tools 9438 Kosmont Really Corp. $100.00 Publication 9439 LA.Cellular Telephone Company $2,212.97 Cellular Telephone Service 9440 Lob Support $6,461.09 Temporary Employment Services 9441 LaserAll Corporation $4,983.24 Printer Maintenance 9442 Laundry World Inc. $107.43 Reconciliation User Refund 9443 Law/Crandall $344.72 Soil Testing 7.13-94 9444 LaMotte Company $164.51 Chemicals 9445 League Of California Cities $30.00 Notting Registration 9446 Lewca Electric Co. $54.00 Truck Parts 9447 Listen,Cassidy&Frierson $1,595.00 Membership 9448 LifecomSafely,Inc. &2,430.98 Safety Supplies 9449 LNP Engineering Plastic,Inc. $1.405.79 Reconciliation User Refund 9450 Madrid Motel $350.95 Reconciliation User Refund 9451 Mar Vac Electronics $1711.41 Instrument Supplies 9452 Mc Junkin Corp $3,952.50 Plumbing Supplies 9453 McMaster-Can Supply Co. $242.52 Tools 9464 Medlin Controls Co. $683.15 Instrument Supplies 9455 Microsoft Corporation $3,390.00 Computer Equipment 9456 Midway Mfg&Machining Co $7,310.00 Mechanical Repairs 9457 Mission Abrasive Supplies $86.20 Safety Supplies 9458 Mission Uniform Service $2.949.93 Uniform Rentals 9459 Monarch Precision Debuning Co $284.14 Reconciliation User Refund 9460 Monitor Labs Inc $6,516.72 Instrument 9461 Motorola 52,255.28 Instrument Supplies 9462 MotoPhob $54.41 Photographic Supplies 9463 MD Pharmaceutical,Inc. $21.809.89 Recancillation User Refund 9464 MPS Photographic Services.Inc. $19.94 Photographic Servlcas 9465 National Career Workshop $139.00 Workshop Registration 9466 National Notary Association $158.00 Notary Package 9467 National Plant Services, Inc. $3.850.00 Vacuum Truck Services 9468 National Technical Information $172.00 Publications 9469 National Technology Transfer $1,190.00 Training Registration 9470 Neozyme International $278.77 Chemicals 9471 Network Solutions Group $4,800.00 Consulting Services 9472 Newark Electronics $2,133.51 Instrument Parts 9473 Nicholas Chevrolet $523.50 Truck Repairs 9474 Nictray Petroleum Co Inc $2.890.43 Lubricants/Diesel Fuel 9475 The Norco Companies $125.60 Mall Delivery Service 9476 Norms Restaurant $273.98 ReconGliatlon User Refund 9477 Novalynx System Inc $1,325.00 Equipment Repair 9478 Office Depot Business Services $1.825.96 Office Supplies M79 Office Pavlllion WAS Office Furniture Repairs 9480 Olsten Staffing Service,Inc. $528.00 Temporary Employment Services 9481 Omni Metal Finishing $3,535.00 Reconciliation User Refund 9482 Orate Corporation $3,232.50 Software 9483 Orange County Red Cross $52.00 Safety Training County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County �- Claims Paid 02/04/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9484 Orange County Wholesale Electric $6,3D727 Instrument Supplies 9485 Orange Valve&Fitting Company $827.24 Fittings 9466 Pacific Ball $1,292.25 Telephone Services 9487 Pacific Mechanical Supply $5,280.77 Plumbing Supplies 9488 Pacific Paris&Controls $381.67 Instrument Supplies 9489 Whessoe Varec Parts $155.63 Pump Parts 94e) Pallets&Accessories $3,335.94 Pallets M91 Parker Hannifin Corporation $476.26 Safety Supplies 9492 Parker Hannifin Corporation $5.43 Freight 9493 Parts Unlinked $664.67 Truck Parts 9494 Plan Salk $222.63 Safety Supplies 9495 Plantation Restaurant $228.34 Reconciliation User Refund 9496 Plegel Oil Company $153.22 Reconciliation User Refund 9497 Power Elocro Supply Co.,Inc. $446.88 Electric Supplies 9498 Precision Industries $1,098.53 $Ilicone Adhesive N99 Primrose lee $96.00 Ice For Samples 9500 Pryor Resources,Inc. $475.00 Training Registration 9501 Pulzmeister,Inc. $779.17 Pump Pads 9502 Ragan Communications,Inc $119.00 Subscription 9503 Rainin Instrument Co.,Inc $293.80 Trash Removal 95W Ralphs Grocery Co.823 $149.47 Reconciliation User Refund 9505 Reliasuir $8.416.00 Lila Insurance Premium 9506 Reliastar Bankers Security Life $4,824.26 Life Insurance Premium 9507 Remedy $16,142.13 Temporary Employment Services 9508 Adriana Renescu $306.19 Meeting Expense Reimb. 9509 Riviera Moral $438.18 Reconciliation User Refund 9510 Roberto's Auto Trim Shop $678.49 Electic Carts Repair 9511 Rosemount Analytical Inc. $456.27 Insbumenl Supplies 9512 RPM Electric Motors 83,468.01 Electric Motor Parts 9513 Santa Fe Pacific Pipeline $620.07 Reconciliation User Refund 9514 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $2,677.59 Specialty Gases 9515 Soon,Reilly&Whitehead $726.46 Legal Services-Personnel Issues 9516 SecandSun 5459.55 Batteries 9517 Serpentok Corporation $8,401.91 Conveyor Pans 9518 Seven-Eleven(7/11)Motel&RV $711.88 Reconciliation User Refund 9519 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $375.51 Tools 9520 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $3,125.04 Tools/Hardware 9521 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. $72.89 Plumbing Supplies 9522 South Coast Water $65.00 Lab Supplies 9523 Southwest Foods/Claim Jumper 4 5233.19 Reconciliation User Refund 9524 Spading Instrument Co.,Inc. $260.00 Meter 9525 Spectrum Yams,Inc. $238.27 Reconciliation User Refund 9526 Speedy Circuits $293.79 Reconciliation User Refund 9527 Spent $37.20 Long Distance Telephone Services 9528 St.Edna Subacute&Rehabilitation $2.332.83 Reconciliation User Refund 9529 State Street Bank and Trust Co $4,662.46 COP Trustee Services 9530 Steven Enterprises,Inc. $917.60 Copier Supplies 9531 Sunset Ford $62.25 Truck Parts 9532 Super Chem Corporation $336.78 Chemicals County Sanitation DisiddS Of Orange County Claims Paid 02/04/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Desc iptlon 9533 SARBS-PDC $875.00 Training Registration 9534 TechSmfth Corporation $207.95 Software Agreement 9535 The Kiplinger Washington Letter $138.00 Subscription 9536 Time Warner Communications $45.47 Cable Services 9537 Teny's Look&Safe Service $34.34 Locks&Keys 9538 Trane $1.057.94 Motor 9539 Tropicana Inn $2.918.60 Reconciliation User Refund 9540 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. $484.93 Truck Pada 9541 Truck Pans Supply&etc. $76.46 Truck Parts 9542 Ultra Scientific $502.00 Lab Supplies 9643 United Education Centers,Inc $485.00 Training Supplies 9544 United Parcel Service $814.36 Parcel Services 9545 Universal Circuits,Inc. $918.98 Reconciliation User Refund 9546 Val Clrcuo,#5 $1,973.98 Reconciliation User Refund 9647 Valley Cities Supply Company $893.50 Plumbing Supplies 9548 Vislar Auto Glass $192.62 Truck Pads 9549 VAR Scientific Products $6,316.81 Lab Supplies 9550 Warehouse Restaurant $485.80 Reconciliation User Refund 9551 Warner Center Associates $851.47 Reconciliation User Refund 9552 Waste Markets $10.437.73 Residuals Removal MO 3.27-96 9553 Western City Magazine $63.00 Subscription 9554 Western Stales Chemical $440.23 Caustic Soda Mo 8-23-95 9555 981&NWCWEA,Inc. $225.00 Training Registration 9556 Blake Anderson $83.16 Cellular Telephone Service Reimb, 9557 Donald F.McIntyre $61.52 Cellular Telephone Service Reimb. 9558 Michael O.Moore $247.16 Meeting Expense Reimb. 9559 Carolyn L.Thompson $368.51 Training Registration 9560 Michelle Tuchman $105.00 Meeting Expense Reimb. 9561 County Sanitation District of $1,007.86 Petry Cash Reimb. 9562 Nylon Computer&Philip Cordova $1,477.03 Employee Computer Loan Program 9563 Reti ortar $11,732.92 Life Insurance Premium Total Claims Paid 02/04/98 $2,184,035.72 L .. County Sanilation Districts Of Orange County Claims Palo 02100198 Sumnrary Amount District No. 1 $28,438.12 District No.2 $13,707.68 District No.3 $468,301.13 District No.5 $4.461.73 District No.7 $48.727.20 District No.11 $1.628.89 CORF $234.297.75 Joint Operations $1.384,473.22 $2.184.035.72 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 02J18I9a Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9579 Advance Constructors Inc $603.213.10 Construction J-3C-1,P2- 5 9560 Atlas-Allied,Inc $46,800.00 Construction P246-2 9581 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. $118.524.00 Professional Services 9582 Barclays Bank PLC $93,820.10 LOC Fees 9583 Camp Dresser 8 McKee Inc. $93.053.00 Engineering Services J40-1,J40-2 9584 Gientch-Mitchell,Inc. $37,432.00 Pump Parts 9585 James Martin S Co. $37.372.50 Data Integration Project 9586 Lee 8 Ro Inc $48,427.93 Engineering Services J-57 9587 Margate Construction Inc. 5506.081.34 Construction P140-2,P247-2 9588 Orange County Water District $44,39D.40 GAP Water Use MO 10.23.96 95419 Pactficere of Ca $37,018.98 Medical Insurance Premium 9590 Pima Gro Systems Inc $109,467.25 Residuals Removal MO3-29.95 9591 Poway Generation Consulting $28,672.00 Consulting Services 9592 Tule Ranch/Magan Forms $56,522.28 Residuals Removal 9593 American Telephone 8 Telegraph-Cellular OR 8 R 52.79 Long Distance Telephone Services 9594 Appleone Employment Service 52,429.49 Temporary Employment Services 9595 Asbury Environmental Services $35.00 Waste Oil Removal 9598 AtkinfJones Computer Services $321.30 Service Agreement 9597 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $1,225.00 Telephone Installation 9598 Bolt Derry $195.00 Freight 9599 Brown And Caldwell 53,34029 Engineering Services P2-35-5,P2353 9600 Burlington Safety Laboratory of Co.,Inc. $207.00 Safety Testing 9601 Carroll Corp. $1.21724 Service Agreement 9602 Cad Warren 8 Co. $1,742.96 Insurance Claims Administrator 9603 Cednet S20.D0 Computer Services 9604 Chapman Counseling $6.300.D0 Employee Training 9605 Chrome Crankshaft Go. $500.00 Pump Parts 96% City of Seal Beach $165.56 Water Use 9607 Clayton Group Services,Inc. $10,763.18 Professional Services 9608 Connell GM Pane $232.62 Track Parts 9609 Corporate Express $4,539.75 Office Supplies 9610 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $237.74 Tmrk Parts 9611 County of orange $870.00 Permits 9612 County Sanitation Districts of OC $21,016.69 Workers Comp.Reimb. 9613 Culligan Water Contl0loning $28.00 Soft Water Service 9614 State of California Deparbnent of Agriculture $19A0 Publication 9615 CWEA 1998 SRSS $365.00 Training Registration 9616 Daily Pilot $266.75 Notices B Acts 9617 Duthie Generator Service, Inc. $6,300.00 Equipment Rental 9618 Eagle Distribution $144.53 Electric Cart Parts 9619 Edge Training Systems,Inc $695.00 Training Materials 9620 Edison Co. $6,616.14 Pa ver 9621 Enchanter,Inc. $2,100.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 9622 Enterprise Technologies $3.068.80 Professional Services 9623 ESP Industries $261.28 Mechanical Supplies 9524 Fairbanks Scales,Inc. $517.66 Service Agreement 9625 Federal Express $103.00 Air Freight 9626 Flo.Systems,Inc. $517.49 Pump Pads 9627 Fountain Valley Camera $23.36 Photo Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 02/IS/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 962E The Foxboro Company $2.236.74 Instrument Supplies 9529 Franklin Covey $171.81 Office Supplies 9630 Fry's Electronics $5,929.112 Electronic&Computer Supplies 9631 City of Fullerton 537.65 Water Use 9632 Ganahl Lumber Company $199.74 Lumber/Hardwars 9633 Gabler Group Inc. $125.00 Meeting Registration N34 The Gas Company $5,385.14 Natural Gas 9635 GTE California $1,135.69 Telephone Services 9636 Governing $15.00 Subscription 9537 Ww Grainger Inc. $85.91 Compressor Parts 9638 GBC(General Binding Corp) $460.00 Maintenance Agreement 9639 Hatch&Klrk Inc. $2.374.43 Truck Pads 9640 Heulaway Storage Containers $405.00 Container Rentals 9641 Hoerolger Service Inc $680.17 Compressor Parts 9642 Home Depot $62.55 Smell Hardware 9643 HI Standard Automotive $418.02 Truck Parts 96" Imaging Plus,Inc $3.163.03 Office Supplies 9645 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $2.90 Water Use 9646 Jamison Engineering.Inc. $2,185.56 Construction Services 9647 Jays Catering $420.58 Directors'Meeting Expense 9648 Johnstone Supply $59.47 Electric Pads 9649 Kato Engineering $4,030.24 Engineering Services 9650 Kelly Paper $406.22 Paper 9651 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. $17,246.89 Ferric Clonde MO 9-27-95 9652 Knowledge Pond $7.762.48 Orl58e Training M53 Knox Industrial Supplies $4.11 Tools 96M L&N Uniform Supply Co. $1,838.45 Reconciliation User Refund 9655 Lewellyn Technology,Inc. $1,296.00 Training Registration 9656 Lexia-Nazis $2.263.57 Subscription 9657 Limbo Vision $160.00 Photographic Services 96H Lard Fleming Architects,Inc $11.052.89 Architectural Services 9659 Mar Vac Electronics $116.64 Instrument Supplies 9660 Mesa Energy Systems,Inc. $826.50 Equipment Repair 9661 Mission Uniform Service $1,831.40 Unflorm Rentals 9662 National Microcomp Services $1,6B5.00 Service Agreement 9563 National Notary Association $175.10 Publication 9664 National Technology Transfer $3.940.00 Training Registration 9665 Netlink Ltd. $1.623.64 Communications Equipment 96% Orange County Forum $25.00 Meeting Registrat on 9667 Orange Valve&Fitting Company $170.57 Fittings 9668 Od¢Fire Protedion $735.00 Service Agreement 9669 Oxygen Service Company $890.64 Specialty Gases 9670 Pacific Bell $28.13 Telephone Services 9671 Pagenet $1,026.87 Rental Equipment 9672 Pitney Bowes $2,062.99 Maintenance Agreement 9673 Rainbow Disposal Co..Inc. $2.160.05 Trash Removal 9674 Red Wng Shoes $357.72 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 9675 Remedy $7,722.61 Temporary Employment Services 9676 Rutan&Tucker Attorneys at Law, $1,044.00 Legal Services County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid=111,96 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9677 SkillPath Seminars $534.00 Training Registration 9678 Smlth-Emery Company $9,842.00 Soil Testing MO 7-13-94 9679 Southern California Edison $14.450.01 Pawm 9680 Sparklatls $5,441.03 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 9681 SARBS-PDC $250.00 Training Registration 9682 SCAOMD Subscription Services $12,165.00 Emissions Fee 9683 The Holman Group $772.48 FAP Premium 9684 Track&Auto Supply.Inc. $268.30 Truck Parts 9685 Michelle Tuchman $48.25 Cellular Telephone Service Reimb. 9686 UC Regents $350.00 Meeting Expense Rehnb. 9887 US Filter/Polymebice,Inc $2,525.50 Lab Supplies 9688 The Vantage Group $14,740.00 Consulting Services 9689 Vencer,Inc. $3,500.03 Reconciliation User Refund 9690 Vision Service Plan-(CA) $7.761.60 Vision Service Premlum 9691 The Wackenhut Corporation $19.816.32 Security Guards 9692 The Wall Street Journal $188.66 Subscription 9693 Wayne Electric $880.34 Electric Parts 9694 Western States Chemical Inc, $19.891.56 Caustic Soda MO 8.23-95 9695 William Hamilton 8 Associates $610.00 Professional Services 9696 Xerox Corporation $10.324.97 Copier Leases 9697 Nevin L.Hadden $435.55 Meeting Expense Reimb. 9698 Donald F.Mcntyro $640.98 Meeting Expense Reimb. 9699 Edward M.Tones $228.11 Meeting Expense Reimb. 9700 Steven W.Evans $1,702.88 Employee Computer Loan Program 9701 Nylon Computer and Larry Wilke $1,289.77 Employee Computer Loan Program 9702 SCAOMD $16,894.77 Emissions Fee Total Claims Paid 02I7898 $2,180,927.d{ Summary Amours District No. 1 $1,838.45 District No.3 $3.500.03 CORF $306,096.54 Sell Insurance Funds $21.016.69 Joint Operations $1,848,475.73 $2,180.927.44 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS — DISTRICT 2 neeengoaee Tax 09/ /ae AGENDA REPORT Item Number ncm mbar County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Joe Rycraw, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: ANNEXATION NO. 78—JOUJON—ROUCHE ANNEXATION TO CSD No. 2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1.) Adopt Resolution No. ; ordering Annexation No. 78— Joujon-Rouche Annexation to CSD No. 2, .608 acres of territory to the Districts in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim. SUMMARY March 17, 1997 the District received a request from Phillip and Barbara Joujon-Rouche, occupants of a single-family residence located at 450 Via Vista, to annex their .608 acre parcel into District No. 2. The Joujon-Rouches are constructing an addition to their home and plan to connect to the public sewer. This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re: A.B.8 tax exchange for annexing properties under which the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and instead collects a higher annexation fee. This includes our annexation acreage fee of $4,008, the recovery cost for Local Agency Formation Commission processing fee of$950, Stale Board of Equalization processing fee of$250, District processing fee of$500 and California Environmental Quality Act filing fee of $38.00 for a total annexation fee of$5,746. The local sewering agency is the City of Anaheim. Staff recommends approval of this resolution. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) NeadWaWWRIO0 MGMda Draft R@M Ucan,B-MS10425NC 02 Anon ex .ft Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Exempt ATTACHMENTS Resolution of LAFCO (DA 97-28) RJR:jee \YUCGabthtpblNApnea L 1 RaLONVum Ba+NYd35B9 LSVL Anrecerc vwse Page 2 DA 97-28 RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE JOUJON-ROUCHE ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 January 14, 1998 On motion of Commissioner Herzog, duly seconded and carried,the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, application for the proposed annexation to the County Sanitation District No. 2, designated as the Joujon-Rouche Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2 (DA97-28), in the County of Orange was heretofore filed with and accepted by the Executive Officer of this Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Title 5, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 et seq of the Government Code; and WHEREAS,the Executive Officer,pursuant to Government Code Section 56838 set January 14, 1998 as the hearing date of this proposal; and WHEREAS,the Executive Officer,pursuant to Government Code Section 56833 has reviewed this proposal and prepared a report including her recommendation thereon,and has famished a copy of this report to each person entitled to a copy; and WHEREAS,this Commission on January 14, 1998 considered the proposal and the report ofthe Executive Officer, and considered the factors determined by the Commission to be relevant to this proposal,including,but not limited to,factors specified in Government Code Section 56841;and WHEREAS,this Commission called for and held a public hearing on the proposal on January 14, 1998,and at the hearing,this Commission heard and received all oral and written protests,objections and evidence which were made,presented or filed,and all persons present were given an opportunity to hear and be heard with respect to this proposal and the report of the Executive Officer, and WHEREAS,the Executive Officer determined this proposal is exempt from CEQA under section 15319 of the State CEQA guidelines. NOW,THEREFORE,the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Orange DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE and ORDER as follows: Resolution No. 97-28 1 Section 1. The proposal is approved subject to the following terms and conditions. a) Payment by the applicant of the State Board of Equalization fees. b) The applicant agrees to defend,hold harmless and indemnify LAFCO and/or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against LAFCO and/orits agents,officers and employees to attack,set aside,voidoramad the approval of LAFCO concerning this proposal or any action relating to or arising out of such approval when such action is brought within the applicable statute of limitations. c) The effective date shall be the date of recordation. Section 2. The annexing area is found to be uninhabited,is within the County of Orange, and is assigned the following distinctive short-form designation: "Joujon-Rohche Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2." Section 3. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 is designated as the conducting authority(G. C. 56029 [b] and [fj)and is hereby directed to conduct. further proceedings without notice and hearing(G. C. 57000). Section 4. The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this resolution as provided in Section 56853 of the Government Code. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: R 1THERS,STEINER,HERZOG,HUNTLEY,AND BORAN,AND VICE-CHAIR SNM AND CHAIR BRESSETTE NOES: NONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) as COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 1, DANA M. SMITH,Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County, California,hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by said Commission at a regular meeting thereof,held on the 14'day of January, 1998. Resolution No.97-28 2 1' IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand this 10 day of January, 1998. DANA M. SMITH Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission By: • p�d1� 1' Y Dana M. Smith F.U AFMLnA9]-28M..wpd Resolution No. 97-28 3 DEPARTMENT ROBERT BEIM, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES i^;A'f [ 14725 Alton Parkway 9 Irvine, California 92618 COUNTYSANITATIO�- DISTRICTS OF O Block Modules - Revised Ray j�F19�� 6154 72. 73 April 10,1997 EXHIBIT "A" JN 33657.01 Page 1 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION JOUJON-ROCHE ANNEXATION NO. 78 DA 97-10 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, being that portion of Section 6, Township 4 South, Range 8 West S.B.M., described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the existing boundary .line of County Sanitation District 2 (CSO No. 2) , said point being the northerly corner of Annexation No. 17, Country Hill Road to said CSO No. 2, and the northeasterly terminus of that certain course described as "North 49030'00" East 394.19 feet" in said annexation, said northerly corner also being in the southeasterly line of Parcel 4 as shown on a map filed in Book 71, Page 18 of Records of Surveys in the Office of the County Recorder of said Orange County; Thence along said course and existing boundary line South 49°30'00" West 10.67 feet to the southerly corner of said Parcel 4; Thence leaving said existing boundary line, along the southwesterly line of said Parcel 4 North 47009'05" West 182.17 feet to the westerly corner of said parcel ; Thence North 40*301000 West 20.00 feet to the centerline of Via Vista (private street) ; Thence along said centerline North 49"30'00" East 119.52 feet to the reference line for a 30.00 foot wide private road easement as shown an said record of survey; Thence along said reference line through the following courses: South 45005'00" East 33.15 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northeasterly and having a radius of 300.00 feet; Thence along said curve southeasterly 168.90 feet through a central angle of 32"15'29"; Thence radially from said curve South 12*39131" West 20.00 feet to the easterly corner of said Parcel 4; nevlseo may 1, ♦yVj Robert Bein, William F,ost & Associates April' 10, 1997 Joujon-Roche Annexation No. 78 DA 97-10 JN 33657-01 To County Sanitation District No. 2 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Thence along the southeasterly line of said Parcel 4 South 49'3O'OO" West 33.35 feet to a point in said existing boundary line of CSO No. 2 as established by the Guy Annexation No. 33, said paint being the northeasterly corner of said annexation; Thence continuing along said southeasterly line of Parcel 4 and along said existing boundary line of CSD No. 2 per said annexation South 49'30'00" West 101.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.608 Acres, more or less. EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Kevin D. McHugh ., P.L.S. 6310 SEO LANO SUq � S Y Ep 9 � .956pg ' �` OF GAUD This proposal does meet the approval of the Orange County Surveyor's Office. ted thi1 . s _ Oay of 1997 I SEO uMO S`qi oh Cana oun y Surveyor +o`�H CAN�N��9 N0. 4408 * Exp. 9!30/97 �rFOF CALA II BLOCK MODULES ✓-pp COOK'S CORNER (mixws 5154 72. 73 I L rR(EQ VIA VISTA (MIME SMEEO ' 1 Ixa•w•mt na.37' 1 p3 ' W~ x�a7D'Qlt 11 A�IS' 90t W FOR � T scue 1• . sD• I e 10 ° FM Rs 71A8 LEAD I 8 � PARCEL 4--a s� — twlvm AM(X6Tlw at W I - PARCEL 3 T T 1N71C125 CUSTIW ftHII1R1'Cr I 9_ C.S.D. W. 2, xPE.urlww. n /N7lG l[S a7M22nwrQ I - C.S.D. w.2,.2, Lvff,wcurra m..v I R. S. B. v 71 PRPAROD ME[ OI.HCTW xl9'30'WTI 3B2.S?I — r — LN H• .SH'JO'9O1 IH.07' ]O.fO'(RAOJ T — •T (.W9 JO'OOt]9a.19' IER C5.0. . 2 AMEX. W. 17) eEY/x 0. YJfid, P.Ls. r0 K1 I 10.57- I I PARCEL 2 $ PARCEL 3 d PCL 4 a •'Aa9.ux6+' 1 I R. S. 8. IP 83 / 40 6 M J9J EXHIBIT 9B' Nis Xi0 . GOES M OE xRKIFx, OF I 1 Y JOUJON-ROCNE ANNEKATION DRUZ azx st x s Oil¢ �COUAgB I p I NO. 78 OA 97 - 10 MI BIY 1991 c y y/ d TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT W. 2 •1'wP ` I R04p I I CONTAINING 0.508 ACS GROSS gAe99 \ 0.466 ACf NET SNEET I OF 1 sllE Nopert Bela MlfleFn=Prat trAtsoeleln ' m s 30INT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS — DISTRICT 3 Mmbn9 Dx Tux ems. vuroe AGENDA REPORT 1Oen1 N1mWr r " N County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineer Originator. Bill Brooks, Engineer 44/ SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO PORTIONS OF MAGNOLIA RELIEF TRUNK AND ORANGETHORPE RELIEF TRUNK FOR 1-5 WIDENING, 'SEGMENT E-2' , CONTRACT NO. 3-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt Resolution No. , Approving Utility Agreement No. 12UT476 with Caltrans for reimbursement of design management, construction management, inspection and associated District costs for modifications to portions of Magnolia Relief Trunk and Orangethorpe Relief Trunk for 1-5 widening, "Segment E-2", Contract No. 3-37. SUMMARY The State of California, acting through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), is responsible for the 1-5 widening project which requires relocation and protection of County Sanitation District No. 3 (CSD3)facilities. Segment E-2 of the 1-5 widening consists of freeway improvements from 0.4 miles south of Magnolia Avenue in the city of Anaheim to 0.1 mile north of Beach Boulevard in the city of Buena Park. The CSD3 facilities within segment E-2 are the Magnolia Relief Trunk and Orangethorpe Relief Trunk sewers and associated manholes. The existing facilities are lawfully maintained in their present location and qualify for protection and relocation at the State's expense under the provisions of Section 703 of the Streets and Highways Code. The design of both trunk sewer relocations has been incorporated into the State's segment E-2 construction plans. CSD3 will provide construction inspection and construction management to ensure work is completed in conformance to District's standards. G Nmk4aNpeM ��R[pPd�ll,Ba,m'dl1Y!JJ)C¢ RpnW „s„ Page 1 CSD3 will invoice the State under conditions of the Utility Agreement. Progress payments and final bill for services provided will be processed by the State within 90 days after receipt of the CSD3 invoice. Detailed records for billings must be compiled and retained by CSD3 for a period of four (4) years and must be available to State under conditions of the utility agreement. CSD3 has estimated $46,700 for design management, construction management and inspection. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Utility Agreement No. 12UT-476 provides for District reimbursement of$46,700. This is sufficient to cover budgeted costs for design management, construction management and inspection. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: District 3 Capital Improvements/Reliability, Item No.2) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) All District's costs for design management, construction management and inspection will be reimbursed by Caltrans. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives to this project since it is required as a result of the 1-5 widening. CEQA FINDINGS By State of California, Department of Transportation. ATTACHMENTS None G NVb NfeMa onn R.W Udnt BwNWI 137 dx R°"'e° 1s Paget 0 v County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, March 25, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, March 25, 1998, at the Districts' Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: OTHERS PRESENT: PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff,General Counsel John J.Collins,Joint Chairman Jan Debay,Chair, District 5 Peer A. Swan,Vice Joint Chair Kent Nelson George Brown,Chair, FAHR Ryal Wheeler Burnie Dunlap,Chair, PDC Pat McGuigan,Chair,OMTS STAFF PRESENT: Donald F.McIntyre,General Manager ABSENT: Blake P.Anderson,Assistant General Manager Bill Steiner, Director/Supervisor Ed Hodges, Director of General Admin. Services Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS Kent Nelson addressed the Committee members on the proposed use of non-union painters. David Hamilton, the business agent for 501, asked Kent to represent him. Their main concern is the message it sends to Districts' employees by replacing permanent employees whose positions are scheduled to be eliminated with non-union contract workers. There is also some concern about administering a contract, such as the one proposed with Dupont, for a ten-year period. It is likely that additional staff will have to be hired to oversee such a large-scale contract. In the past, summer crews painted structures and tunnels. D Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 March 25, 1998 The General Manager asked that Discussion Item 3, the Dupont Paint Contract, be moved so that it could be discussed first. RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The draft minutes of the February 25, 1998 Joint Steering and Ad Hoc Committees meeting were approved as mailed. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager mentioned that the 'contraption' in the parking lot will be used at the City Managers meeting tomorrow to demonstrate the amount of rainwater inflow through holes in manhole covers and frames. Mr. McIntyre also indicated that the Districts received word that several manhole covers were removed in the City of Irvine to relieve flooding and the covers were then lost. It will be difficult to determine who actually removed the covers, but this is a very serious issue. We may, in the future, have to decide to what extent we should make an issue of this kind of action. Director Swan indicated that this is a policy question--what should be our response as an organization. Director Dunlap asked if this issue is on the agenda for the City Managers meeting, and to let the cities aware that we are evaluating the results of these actions. Chairman Collins indicated that he would recommend that when these actions occur, the General Manager calls the City Manager and then follow up with a letter stating ramifications; and also that the Joint Chairman sends a letter to the Mayor. The Districts should then work with the cities to fur the problem area through cooperative projects. Action Item: General Counsel will research and determine what kind of enforcement powers we have in these situations. Mr. McIntyre mentioned that the February flow averaged 284 mgd, an increase of 40 mgd. This has added 3.3 mgd on the end-of-year mgd number. The Board of Supervisors has set April 14 to hear protests on the consolidation of the Districts. The schedule for Strategic Plan workshops was discussed. At the Ad Hoc meeting, the April 25 workshop was changed to May 9. The May 9 workshop was originally scheduled as a budget review workshop. It was recommended that a new date for a budget workshop be decided after the budget goes through the working committees. The Directors may decide a special workshop isn't necessary. It was also recommended that dates be added to the schedule a quarter at a time (May, June, July/August, September, October, etc.). Staff is currently trying to get a community calendar to avoid future conflicts. u Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 March 25, 1998 REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel discussed the lawsuit against Penn-Wilson. Discussions are continuing. He also updated the members of the status of the County's cases against Merrill Lynch and others. The case against Merrill Lynch is scheduled to go to trial in September. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-5) 3. Dupont Paint Contract—Use of Non-union Labor Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, described the proposed project, explaining the methodology, not the requirements of a contract. He said that staff is looking to change the way painting is done within the treatment plants, moving towards a more strategic planning mode. The Five Year Staffing Plan calls for a reduction in the number of painters, from 7 to 4. A contractor would do the majority of the work the painters have done, that is, tunnels, repainting equipment and limited process painting. The bigger pieces of equipment and structures were usually painted by outside contractors, either through separate small contracts or included in larger construction projects. A contractor would do it all if this project is approved. Any contract would include a 30-day termination clause. The Directors questioned the union vs. non-union workforce, as well as issuing a contract rather than going through the bid process. Kent Nelson commented that if management goes ahead with a contract with Dupont it looks like management prefers non-union labor. The Directors stated that this was an issue of being stewards of the public's money and if there are cost savings involved as a result of the contract, h should be considered. Mr. Hodges staled that Dupont has conducted a survey of the plants and would bring all process equipment to Condition 1 and would maintain at Condition 2. After further discussion, the members of the Steering Committee recommended that the issue be presented at a future OMITS Committee meeting, including a discussion on why the project would be a PSA, rather than putting it out for bid. Director Swan asked if an employee group could make a bid. This would be allowed. 1. OCSD Flag Michelle Tuchman discussed the possibility of flying a new OCSD flag in the front of the Administration Building, along with the US and CA flags. The members of the Steering Committee indicated no interest at this time. 2. Watershed Management in the Santa Ana River Blake Anderson made a presentation to the Steering Committee on how watershed management in the Santa Ana River Basin affects our agency. He discussed the results I Minutes of the Steering Committee c Page 4 March 25, 1998 of flooding in the watershed on ground water and Santa Ana River water quality, including the problem of dairy milk-bam water and biosolids disposal, and increasing salt and nitrogen counts in the groundwater. Blake and Nancy Wheatley are preparing a white paper on this issue describing the existing role of the agency and the proposed formal entity to address these issues of concern with concerned parties in Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside and Chino. Staff is continuing to work with other agencies to figure out a way to get federal funding to evaluate this regional problem. One item that will be discussed in the white paper is adding SAWPA as a member of the Districts' Board of Directors in return for our becoming a member of the SAWPA Board of Directors. Another issue is the blending of wastewater into groundwater for ultimate use as drinking water. Only 50% of the drinking water can be reclaimed water, therefore, it is important that the water quality of the Santa Ana River is as good as it can be. Director Swan indicated that the 1968 agreement with SAWPA addresses water quality standards and this document should be referenced in the white paper. Mr. McIntyre stated staff will present the white paper to the Steering Committee next month. He also indicated that this regional issue will be a major topic in the next update of the Strategic Plan 4. Steering Committee and Board Meeting Start Times Michelle Tuchman said that the Directors overwhelmingly prefer a Board Meeting start time of 6:30 rather than 7:30 p.m. The members of the Steering Committee decided that the Steering Committee start time would be 5 p.m. These changes will be effective with the July 1, 1998 Special Board Meeting. 5. Review Agenda Items Scheduled to Be Presented to Committees in April CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING The pension issue will be pulled from the Board agenda and be returned to FAHR for further discussion. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 March 25, 1998 CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Director McGuigan offered to reschedule the July 1 OMTS meeting to July 8 to avoid any conflicts with the Special Board Meeting. The Chairmen of the PDC and FAHR Committees will be asked about postponing their regular July meeting dates one week as well. The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for April 22, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m. Submitted by*� Je Tappan, SteeringC mmittee Secretary H: MCYgeMaVSIEEAING WMM�Minh County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenu. Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN - - Thursday, March 19, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, March 19, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: OTHERS PRESENT: PRESENT: Kellene Burn-Lucht,CDM George Brown, Comm. Chair and Chair, Toby Weissen,Carollo Engineers FAHR Thomas M. Dawes,Consultant John Collins,Joint Chair Bruce Broadwater, Director/Mayor of Garden Peer A.Swan,Vice Joint Chair Grove Burnie Dunlap,Chair,PDC Mark Leyes, Director,Garden Grove Shirley Dettloff,Chair pro tem, Dist. 11 Mark Asturias,City of Garden Grove Pat McGuigan,Chair, OMTS George Tindall, City of Garden Grove Bill Steiner,Supervisor/Director Les Jones,City of Huntington Beach Adam Pobanski ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Jan Debay,Chair, District 5 Don McIntyre,General Manager Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager Gary Streed, Director of Finance Michelle Tuchman,Director of Communications Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM, IF NECESSARY No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page 2 March 19, 1998 ' RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the February 25, 1998 Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chairman George Brown did not make a report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don McIntyre stated that two items would be discussed at this meeting; the Districts response to the letter from Garden Grove and the schedule for the remaining tasks in the Strategic Plan. The Directors and staff representing Garden Grove, Mayor Bruce Broadwater, Mark Leyes, George Tindall and Mark Asturias, were invited to the meeting to discuss the issues of concem. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-2) 1. Strategic Plan and Rate Structure changes: concerns raised by City of Garden Grove in their February 24, 1998 letter (copy attached) Mr. McIntyre thanked City Manager George Tindall for sending a draft copy of the letter before it was mailed, as that gave the Districts an opportunity to prepare a response and receive feedback. The response was prepared to address the issues of concern section by section in the same order presented in the letter. After reviewing the Districts' response, Director Broadwater questioned why an economic study on how rate structure changes will affect individual industries could not be done. He felt that the members of the Boards should have the right to see if some of these industries would be severely adversely impacted. Mr. Tindall then expressed Garden Grove's concems, including public outreach and having more commercial and industrial representation on advisory committees. The proposed changes to the rate structure will have a major impact on the business community, especially restaurants and car washes. He mentioned taking a market-base approach to source reduction, and asked that the Strategic Plan address the concept of reducing the amount of water to the sewer lines through subsidized pre-treatment processes. Other utilities have assisted businesses in this manner. He asked that the EIR consider the issue of impacts on business retention when the analysis of the Strategic Plan alternatives and the rate structure is finalized. Mr. Tindall mentioned that since the letter was written, a lot has happened and some of the points are no longer of concern. Mr. Tindall suggested that the Districts form a standing technical advisory committee, similar to the advisory committees for transportation, flood control, and other regional bodies, and include major stakeholders, water producers, pumpers and users. Minutes of the Ad Hoe Committee re the Strategic Plan Page 3 March 19, 1998 Mr. Tindall also suggested hiring an outside consultant to see how everything within the Strategic Plan fits together and how it impacts the economics of the Orange County business community. While existing rates are low, they are only a good benchmark. The proposed increases may not stand up in court if challenged because an independent analysis has not been done that indicates the need for the increases. Ad Hoc and staff members discussed some of the ways the Districts' Source Control division has assisted business and industry to reduce wastewater strength and flow. However, treatment facilities must be designed to handle peak flow through the treatment plants and out the ouffall. This is more important than what comes down the pipe day-by-day. Director Broadwater said that some of the rate increases are as much as 700% and this will be a major impact on business. He asked that businesses be given notice before this increase is implemented. He recommended again that an economic study be done before implementing the increases. Director Leyes indicated that the RAC had considered the timing and planning for making the change. He also stated that restaurants usually operate with a very small profit margin, and the increase in fees will be a major impact. Chairman Brown said that these suggestions would be considered. Director Swan pointed out that the costs of delaying implementation could be as high as $500,000 per month. This would be on top of the costs of a study. Mr. Tindall stated that the City was not asking for a macro study on business in Orange County; rather accumulating as much information as possible so that the Board has enough information to make an informed decision on the proposed rate structure. Director Leyes suggested that the Strategic Plan be more than a facilities plan; it should address low-tech things that could take stress of the system. Action: Chairman Brown asked that the City of Garden Grove further review the Districts' response and provide a letter summarizing what additional items they would like the Districts to consider, which were not addressed in the response. Mr. McIntyre stated that there is a city managers meeting at the Districts next week and he would be happy to discuss the feasibility of a technical advisory committee with them. 2. Strategic Plan Schedule and Upcoming Meetings The revised schedule was discussed. Changes are necessary because of the extension of CDM's contract to include review of the impacts of the new permit requirement on operations. The issue of conflicts with meetings of other agencieslentities will be mediated by compiling a master calendar of events throughout the county. Action: Hold the next Directors workshop on the Strategic Plan on Saturday, May 9. Include discussion of date for budget workshop at the next Steering Committee meeting. The General Manager will make a recommendation at that meeting. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page 4 March 19, 1998 Gary Streed mentioned that last year was the first year the Saturday, one-half day budget workshop was held, and there were very few questions about the financial plan itself. Since the budget is presented to the working committees, all directors have the opportunity to discuss it prior to approving it at the June meeting. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting is tentatively scheduled for June 1998; the exact date and time to be determined. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Submitted by: J Tappan, Ad Ho4 C Immiltee Secretary wmm�cerwoHoceema,asa m��.e« CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 11222 ACACIA PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 3070. GARDEN GROVE. CALIFORNIA 228&2 e, (714) 741-5100 February 24, 1998 Mr.John Collins City of Fountain Valley 10200 Slater Avenue -- Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Collins: 1 am Writing to you as a fellow board member of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(CSDOC)to express the City of Garden Grove's concerns about CSDOCs proposed Strategic Plan for Capital Improvements and related rate structure. While we, as CSDOC, have taken important steps taward the continued provision of efficient and coat effective services to our constituents. the City of Garden Grove has a number of concerns about the current process for reviewing the plans and rates. As you are aware, CSDOC formed a Planning Advisory Committee(PAC) and a Rate Advisory Committee (RAC)to review and make recommendations on the proposed Strategic Plan and rates. We are concerned that these committees have primarily focused on narrow issues, and have not focused on the overall impacts that their recommendations wig have an the county's residents and businesses. The rates and capital Improvements are inextricably linked, and we believe that there needs to be a thorough review of the financial, service and technical assumptions undwtyi ng these issues before the Strategic Plan is drafted. This is even more evident in fight of our recent actions to delay the PAC's efforts bemuse of the draft NPOES permit recently Issued by EPA Our specific concerns are as fouows: Review of Design Criteria and Assumofions—The PAC is charged with reviewing collection system deficiencies, improvement atematives and discharge alternatives, but has not been provided with a dear explanation of the design Criteria and assumptions in order to be able to assess Whether proposed facility standards are being set in a manner consistent with anticipated service needs. The provisions of the draft NPDES permit may sign icantly.aher the design assumptions and affect the alternatives and more time is needed to assess the baseline assumptions which may be impacted by the NPDES permit CSDOC staff has been working hard to educate the Board on these complex issues. We, as a Board, need to to focus an these issues and involve our own technical staffs for input. Mr. John Collins February 24, 1998 Page 2 Range of Levels Of Capital Far,Tnies Improvements—The PAC is reviewing design alternatives to improve CSDOC capital faclides, but it is unclear whetherthese alternatives are designed to meet minimum requirements, ultimately desired facifi les, or something in between. And the NPOES permit also may affect our cepitai faeLtles plan. The PAC should also be provided with analyses of how each alternative may impact future development within member agency areas, as well as specific information an the design criteria underlying the design alternatives_ Financing Plans—White the RAC has completed its recommendations on the rate structure, it is unclear what the impacts on the community vnll be since the capital facility needs are still undefined. The PAC or RAC needs to include the issue of how capital Improvements-are-tg-be---- fmanced in its recommendations, and how the financing options Will affect the community and member agencies. Financial Impacts—The PAClRAC process does not provide for a comprehensive overview of CSDOC's plans,and not all agencies potentially affected by the plan are included on the PAC. We believe that all affected local agencies should be consulted regarding capital facility costs to that agency before a final plan Is considered by CSDOC. In addition, we believe that there needs to be much greater involvement of other stakeholders,especially the tamness eornnulnity. There needs to be a much broader representation of business than exist, in the current process. It might be benefiicial to explore the possibility of Involving loiai academics, such as those at the graduate schools of administration at the University of Caiifomia at Irvine and Chapman University, to provide an independent analysis of the impacts of the proposed plan on resi fonts. business and government amities Business Retention and Attraction Ineentives--AII of the currently identified alternatives reviewed by the PAC will have a significant adverse impact on the commercial and Industrial communities in the county. We believe that an incentive program needs to be included In the Strategic Plan for businesses that reduce system demand below projections. Market analyses need to he conducted regarding what sods of businesses could be attracted that will continue to Improve the economic vitaldy of the county, without straining the sanitary infrastructure, and how CSDOC and member agencies an work cooperatively to attract these types of businesses. Environmental Impact Report—CSDOC has already Initiated the Emrironmentai Impact Report (EIR) process, but the alternatives are not yet settled especially In light of the draft NPDES permit requirements and the impact it may have to our baseline assumptions. This may lead to the EIR not adequately addressing the alternatives that are finally included in the Strategic Plan. We believe that CSOOC should delay the EJR until the attematives are selected and developed so that they can be property incorporated Into the EIR. In short, we believe that the current process has created too much separation between economics and design. While the rate structure has been recommended, it is impossible to assess the impacts of that structure, since the facility needs have not yet been resolved. On the other hand, facility needs and altematives are being considered without an understanding of Mr. John Collins February 24. 1998 Page 3 the overall impact that they will have on the community under the proposed rate structure. We believe that CSDOC should not act to adopt either the rate structure orfaoTity,plans until all necessary data has been collected, analyzed, and discussed in a comprehensive manner. Both I and my colleague and fellow board member, Mark L eyes, believe that the entire process needs to be slowed down. The Board needs to sit down with staff and discuss the design criteria that are to be used to develop the Plan. We also needle get broader imrolvement and input from the business community. In addition,the EIR needs to be delayed until the plan is frm enough to ensure that all necessary elements are analyzed. Finally,we believeAlud there needs to be an Economic Impact Report(an Independent financial analysis) of the impacts of the proposed plan and rates before arty action Is taken on either. This Economic Impact Report" . ... must tell us how our efforts will Impact the business community and residents we serve. It mud show us how our rates might ad as a disincentive to attracting new business to the county. We hope that you will join us in caQmg for a revised process, based on a comprehensive understanding of the way in which the financial and operational pieces fit together,and taking Into account the likely Impacts that the ultimate plan and rate structure wig have on Orange County's residents, businesses and local agencies. Sincerely, Bruce A Broadwater Mayor a: Don McIntyre, General Manager r County Sanitation Districts Of Orange county, callromia P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1. 1998- 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on April 1, 1998, at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL - The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John Collins, Joint Chair Chris Dahl, Director of Information Technology Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. Steve Anderson David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Don Bankhead Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Margie L. Rice Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Charles E. Sylvia Mark Esquer, 08M Process Support Manager Nick Arhontes, Collections Maintenance Manager bA sent: Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Jon Thomsic, Sr. Engineer James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair John Swindler, Database Support Group Manager John E. Noyes Jerry Jones, Maintenance Manager Dave Sullivan Doug Cook, Chief Operator George Robertson, ECM Supervisor Pat Magnante, Committee Secretary Frankie Woodside, Alternate Secretary Others Present: Representatives from: Carollo (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 April 1, 1998 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the March 4, 1998 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Director McGuigan circulated a form to record current E-mail addresses to update the Committee Secretary's records. Nancy Wheatley showed slides of her recent visit to Singapore. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Don McIntyre reported on the following items: • The FY98199 Budget process has been completed. The budget process was a lot better because of the Financial Information System (FIS). • Last Thursday there was a meeting with the City Managers. We will be hosting a half-day session the first Saturday in June to discuss the Strategic Plan and cooperative projects. • Our last budget report from February indicates we are about$36/mg below our target of $491/mg primarily due to high flows. We are estimating that the February flow will increase the end of year average flow by over 3/mgd. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER No report was given. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (Hodges) Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, reported on the followed items: • A one-page summary on influent trunk sewer flows was distributed and described to the Directors. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (Dahl) No report was given. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee t Page 3 April 1, 1998 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (Ooten) Bob Ooten reported on the following items: • Changes in the Proposed Water Efficiency Program that will install more low-flow toilets and fewer shower heads and sink aerators resulting in an increase in water to be conserved in the Districts' service area. • A review of the Operations and Maintenance monthly report to the OMTS Committee was provided. Staff and Directors noted inconsistencies in the report. A natural gas summary was provided on the first page of this report, noting that fixing the price of natural gas was not cost-effective this winter. • The weather has impacted biosolids disposal contractors. Director McGuigan asked if grit removal was cost-effective vs. allowing grit to run through the system. Bob Cotten will review and provide a report next month. Mark Esquer replied that the greatest savings will be realized in reduced digester cleaning costs as the grit will accumulate in the anaerobic digesters if not removed. O&M Monthly Report Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report: A report for the month of February is submitted to the OMTS Committee for review. This report focuses on compliance, safety, financial data and performance measures for O & M and is intended to provide Committee members with information on a timely basis. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Nancy J. Wheatley reported on the following items: • Angie Holden's retirement from the Districts. • The EPA permit is expected on April 12, 1998. If received on that date, it will become effective on May 13 for a five year period (until May 13, 2003). • Biosolids - Over the next few years, we need to track the ability to continue to landify biosolids with changes in the ordinance, changes in DTSC regulations and the National Organics Program which have the potential to limit our ability to landify. Director Swan suggested that we evaluate purchasing land for the disposal of biosolids. Nancy stated that this will be addressed in the Strategic Plan. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 1 April 1, 1998 DISCUSSION ITEM(Sl 1, OMTS98-013 PLANT 2 15-ACRE PARCEL LEASE AGREEMENT WITH VILLAGE NURSERIES, SPECIFICATION P-180. Motion: Moved, seconded and carried with the following comment changes to Section 4 ("Tenant shall not assign this Lease without the prior written consent of Landlord to any business other than a Nursery".) and Section 6 ("Tenant shall use the leasehold property only as a Nursery and operate in accordance with the Master Plan..."). Director Swan objected. 2. OMTS98-014 OUTSOURCING OF PROCESS AREA PAINTING SERVICES. Motion: Moved, seconded and carried with the following comment changes: 1) Remove the "non-union" requirement, 2)Add an Annual Renewal clause 3) Present a report to the OMTS Committee in one year. 3. OMTS98-015 TEMPORARY DISCHARGE AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT(IRWD) FOR THE DISCHARGE OF GROUNDWATER FROM THE IRVINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (ICDC) DURING THE ONE-YEAR DEWATERING CONSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PETERS CANYON WASH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO THE DISTRICTS' SEWERAGE SYSTEM (DISTRICT NO. 14). Motion* Moved, seconded and carried. 4. OMTS98.016 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO CONDUCT DISTRICTS' OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE 120-INCH OUTFALL. Mot'on: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1)Award a 68-month professional services contract to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to conduct the "Core Monitoring" portion of the Districts' newly issued Ocean Monitoring Program, and 2)Approve the proposed fixed price amount of$984,638.00 for the first 20-month program segment. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee I Page 5 April 1, 1998 5. OMTS98-017 OFFICE AND PLANT COMPUTERIZATION OVERVIEW. o ' m Information only. Concept was unanimously approved to move on to other Committees. 6. OMTS98-018 J-42 REINVENTION AND AUTOMATION PROJECT Motion: Information only. This report was submitted to the FAHR Committee for approval on 2/11/98. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY No other business. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQL ENT MEETING CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for May 6, 1998 at the Districts' Administrative Offices. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Submitted by: Patricia J. MagnakW tV Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary H:\WP.DTAX0W1OVMGNANTB0MTS_C-MPR98W1N 0498.WPD -1� OMTS Meetlng Date TO JL&ds. 09/1/9a 09/2n% AGENDA REPORT Rem NUMMr Rem ;ter County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Cl FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration G SUBJECT: PLANT 2 15-ACRE PARCEL LEASE AGREEMENT WITH VILLAGE NURSERIES, SPECIFICATION P-180 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to enter into a Lease Agreement with Village Nurseries for 15 acres of land at the northern part of Plant No. 2 for a period of ten (10) years. SUMMARY At last month's OMTS, the committee discussed the possible leasing out of some vacant land in the Northern-most part of Plant 2. There are a few changes from the agreement that was discussed last month. These include: 1. The amount of land that we would consider leasing is now 15 acres, compared to the original 30 acres that was under discussion a few months ago. This change was made to accommodate the Engineering and O&M departments projected needs for this land during the term of this agreement. 2. The Committee requested additional language put into the agreement that will assess a financial penalty on Village Nurseries in the event of a Breach of Contract. 3. The Committee requested additional language added to reinforce the Termination by Landlord section. 4. Additionally, the Committee requested that a Proforma analysis be included in the April Agenda Report package. Attached for your guidance and information are two versions of the Proforma analysis. Analysis#1 indicates that the Districts could expect a payback in year three and an Internal Rate of Return of 96% over the 10-year term of this agreement. The assumptions in the Analysis#1 are that: a) Grading will be provided by the Districts to allow the Districts to retain rainwater within the plant and act as a temporary retention basin for this water during a storm event. b) The Districts will install fencing to prevent Village Nurseries personnel from entering the plant(included in this cost will be two gates that would be used by Districts' personnel, one on each side of the property). H 1wp Repel4r OMTS d- Re .. 1/5W Page 1 r In analysis#2, the Districts could expect a payback in year two and an Internal Rate of Return of 181% over the 10-year term of the agreement. The assumptions in the Analysis#2 are that: a) Grading of the property will need to occur whether the property is leased to Village Nurseries or not. Like the assumption in analysis#1, the property will be graded in such a manner as to allow the Districts to retain rainwater within the plant and act as a temporary retention basin for this water during a storm event. The cost for this grading in NOT included in analysis#2. b) The Districts will install fencing to prevent Village Nurseries personnel from entering the plant (included in this cost will be two gates that would be used by Districts' personnel, one on each side of the property). c) The Districts will install a device that would allow the Banning gate to be remotely operated by Village Nurseries personnel. Also attached for your guidance and information is a copy of the proposed lease. Section 8— Breach, and Section 10—Termination by Landlord, contains language that is intended to reinforce our position. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will make a brief presentation to the Committee. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The Districts will receive annual Lease payments of: YEAR 1 AND 2 $ 1,000.00/Acre YEAR 3 THRU 6 $ 2,000.00/Acre YEAR 7 $ 2,060.00/Acre YEAR 8 $ 2,122.00/Acre YEAR 9 AND 10 $2,185.00/Acre Option years to increase at$200/acre biannually BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Not to proceed with the lease and leave the land in its present vacant condition. 1Va Wine IMP d,ft,aMlO MValage N✓br/,46enda Reps OMTS Eoc Raaxd. 11. Page 2 17 CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Proforma Analysis Ground Lease Agreement EEH: fw maeamvenwaaww,onmao.rveaw rnunwwm=a.w,rooi.,rs.eo� Page 3 Profarme Analysis at 312DW 11:09 VILLAGE NURSERIES INCOME STATEMENT Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year4 Year 5 Year 8 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Annual Revenue S15.OD0.00 $15.000.00 S30,DDO.00 $30.000.00 $30.0D0.D0 $30,000.00 530,900.00 $31.830.00 $32,775.00 $32,775.00 TOTAL REVENUE 15.00D.00 15.000.00 30,ODD.00 30.000.00 30,0D0.00 30,000.00 30.900.00 31.830.00 32,775.00 32,775.00 Grading and Rainwater Storage Basin 12,000.00 Fence with 2 gates 6.200.00 Motorhoul gate operator®Banning Gate 20.DDD.DD TOTAL EXPENSES 39,20D.00 NET INCOME 1$23,200.00)1 (8,20D.00)j 21,800.001 30.000.001 30.O00.001 30.000.001 30,900.001 3t,830.ODL 32,775,001 32.7]S.DD� CUMMUTATIVE NET INCOME ($23,200.O1)) (Sa.200.00)I S21,BW.00I S51,a00A0 Semi $111,800.00 $142.700.00 $174,530.00 320],3D5.00 $240.080.00 Italia of Internal Ita of Return 9 (17 T a mat Nat Na is w0 thk proe Saes Nmah.no no sewn.without this..ton. Prororma Anah,sis S2 mama 11:10 VILLAGE NURSERIES(without Grading) INCOMESTATEMENT Y earYou Year Year YW5 Year Year? Year Year Year 10 Annual Revenue E15,000.00 $30,000.00 $30.000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30.900.00 $31,830.00 $32,775.00 $32.775.00 TOTAL REVENUE 15,000.00 30,000.00 30.000.00 30,000.00 30.000.00 30.900.00 31.830.00 32,775.00 32,775.00 EXPENSES Fence with 2 gates Moloftetl gate operator @ Banning Gate TOTAL EXPENSES NET INCOME L %11200A0)1 3.800.001 33.800.0131 30.000.001 30.000.001 30.000.001 30,900 001 31.830.001 32,775.DD1 32,775A01 CUMMUTATIVE NET INCOME ($11200.00) E3,800.00 $39.800.00 $63,800.00 $93,8O0.00I E123.800.00 $154,100.O0 $186.530.00I $219,305.00 $252,060.00I Internal Rate of Return 181% OMTS Me dng Date I To R ardS. 04 /1/98 04nz/9e AGENDA REPORT Item Number IjgryNuW County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California /Y FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration a Fea.eeH SUBJECT: OUTSOURCING OF PROCESS AREA PAINTING SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to enter into a Maintenance Service Agreement with DuPont to provide the Maintenance Painting Services at the treatment plants, based on a ten year program. The Agreement will be in a Districts' standard form of terms and conditions subject to approval of the General Counsel. SUMMARY In this year's CORF budget, staff included$200,000 for a process area-painting contract. During the Directors review of the CORF budget, it was requested that staff bring this item forward through the committee process prior to spending any monies on process area painting. Historically, the Districts have painted the facilities in one of three ways: 1. We currently employee a staff of 7 painters. These painters: a) paint equipment that has been rebuilt in the Districts rebuild shop, b) have provided some limited painting services in the treatment plants (generally painting some pipes), c) provide all of the painting services of the offices, conference rooms and non-treatment plant structures and d) paint all of the Districts vehicles and electric carts. Additionally, these staff employees assist with moving furniture and setting up conference rooms and other tasks as assigned. In our 5-year staffing plan, we will be reducing this group from 7 painters to 3. These remaining painters will focus on their core business of painting the administrative areas and rebuild equipment and will spend less time painting in the treatment plants and assisting with other duties. 2. Until recently, we have employed a Summer Crew of 10-12 part time employees who have been assigned to a painting crew. These crews paint the Districts digester pump rooms, pipes in tunnels and pipes located on the top of our secondary structures. 3. For the larger structures involving scaffolding (i.e.: tanks, surge towers, air separation plant cold boxes, etc.), the Districts have hired outside contractors to provide those services. Generally, the Districts have used contractors to paint, when the condition of the device that they are hired to paint is in a "poor" condition. H:I"dta�saWlON gasOuPonlWq BROWgd OMTSdw R.,.. ,,,,,a Page 1 1 The DuPont Company provides a Maintenance Painting Service that is designed to protect all of our steel assets. Under this program, DuPont will assume the responsibility for painting our plants process areas, at an agreed upon level of protection and/or appearance, for an extended period of time, at a predetermined fee. The primary objective of entering into such an agreement is to produce the lowest annualized maintenance painting cost. Staff has been investigating this type of comprehensive turnkey service for a few years now and believes that DuPont is the only company that provides such a service. DuPont currently provides a similar service at the Fairfax Water Authority in Fairfax, VA; City of San Buenaventura Water Department in Ventura, CA; the Chevron El Segundo Refinery in El Segundo, CA; the BASF Corporation in Freeport, TX; and the Union Carbide Corporation in Texas City, TX, in addition to over 40 clients worldwide. Staff hired DuPont to conduct a painting survey of our plants. Based upon the results of that survey, DuPont put together the budgeted costs to provide a Maintenance Painting Service agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, DuPont will contract with local painting companies to apply paint made by various suppliers to DuPont's standards and specifications. The Districts' Project Manager will participate in the process of painting contractor evaluation and selection. Entering into this agreement will allow us to reduce our painting staff from 7 employees to 3 employees and comply with our 5-year staffing agreement. As stated earlier in the report, this will allow us to focus on our core business of painting the administrative areas and equipment that has been rebuilt in our rebuild shop. Additionally, it will allow us to refocus our staffing efforts on future Summer Programs away from painting and more towards tunnel clean up and weed abatement. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration and Nick Arhontes, Plant Facilities Maintenance Manager, will present a verbal report on this item. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The cost for this program based on current paint conditions is anticipated to be: 1998 Painting Season (May—Sept) $833,713 2000 Painting Season (May—Sept) $830.042 2002 Painting Season (May—Sept) $760,192 2004 Painting Season (May—Sept) $766,933 2006 Painting Season (May—Sept) $827,439 Staff budgeted $200,000.00 in this year's CORF budget for these services. Additional monies will need to be budgeted in subsequent years. For the Districts own employees to provide this level of service, would require that we hire an additional 6-10 painters, added specialized consultants, inspectors, increase our painting supplies inventory and increase our Outside Equipment Rental budget. Staff does not believe that it is cost effective or does it make good business sense to add staff. H Wq.U18`gss4lpJgbefNUPMMgx9e FeatPp OMI5.0% ate.,,,, 4m Page 2 b Annual continuation of the program will be subject to OMTS Committee review based on staffs evaluation of performance. The Agreement can be cancelled at any time, without any penalty. The General Counsel advises that this is a Maintenance Services Agreement and not subject to laws governing Public Works Construction activities. As such, the Board is authorized to proceed in making an award without the necessity of following the closed public bidding requirements and awarding to the lowest responsible bidder. Staff recommends award to DuPont on a negotiated basis. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES 1. Not to proceed with an agreement for these maintenance services. 2. Hire additional staff to provide this level of service. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A EEH: fw K1vp.�10�WQMAWN Rqv OM .0 R..e.� ,ffi9B Page 3 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeumg Date TO 34 9da. 4/1/98 4/2]/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Numbe Ite Number Ot4rs---- ,SAP County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Originator: Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager SUBJECT: TEMPORARY DISCHARGE AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD) FOR THE DISCHARGE OF GROUNDWATER FROM PETERS CANYON WASH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO THE DISTRICTS' SEWERAGE SYSTEM (District No. 14). GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize Temporary Discharge Agreement with IRWD for the discharge of groundwater from the Irvine Community Development Company during the one-year dewatering constructions for Peters Canyon Wash Channel Improvement. SUMMARY Technical Services Department requests approval of a Temporary Discharge Agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District for the discharge of groundwater by the Irvine Community Development Company during the one-year project, commencing May 1, 1998. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The Districts will receive from IRWD $197,601 connection charges for this project. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Irvine Community Development Company (ICDC) is a Delaware Corporation involved in the construction of a dewatering construction project known as Peters Canyon Wash Channel Improvement (Peters Canyon). As part of the project, ICDC will be constructing improvements to the Peters Canyon, including excavation to lower and widen the channel cross section. Due to the existence of shallow groundwater in the vicinity, dewatering will be necessary during construction of channel improvements. MT:mb H1wp.dWaLL 13590tbem"\Agenda.Pet mCanyon.dm Page 1 ICDC has requested that it be allowed to discharge the groundwater from the ' dewatering activity to the Districts' sewer system. It is anticipated that the discharge rate i will be 1,000 gallons per minute (1.44 million gallons per day) for the one-year agreement period. Through a proposed Special Purpose Discharge Permit that County Sanitation District No. 14 (District No. 14)would issue to ICDC, ICDC would be required to measure the flow, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and suspended solids (SS) and provide these measurements to the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) and District No. 14 on a monthly basis. Under the proposal, District No. 14 and IRWD would charge ICDC for the actual charge for use at$263.32 per million gallons, $92.92 per thousand pounds of SS, and $118.03 per thousand pounds of BOD, related to the conveyance, treatment and disposal of the discharge. District No. 14 will invoice IRWD for District No. 14's costs of the discharge by ICDC separately from all other wastewater discharges. The Districts will lease to IRWD temporary capacity rights to transport the groundwater discharge of ICDC from District No. 14 to the Districts' treatment plant during the term of this agreement. IRWD will pay to the Districts, for the temporary capacity right, $197,601, which is estimated based on the flow of 1,000 gpm (1.44 million gallons per day)for the period of one year, until May 1, 1999. The Districts will adjust the amount of the temporary capacity right based on the actual flow discharged by ICDC and will invoice IRWD accordingly. The temporary capacity right and Special Purpose Discharge Permit are proposed to terminate on the earlier of 1) May 1, 1999, or 2)the date of completion of the project improvements by ICDC and acceptance of the of the improvement project by the Orange County Flood Control District. The permit will include a provision to preclude ICDC from discharging stormwater to the sewer system. ICDC currently has an NPDES permit for the discharge of stormwater directly to the storm drain. In order to prevent interference to the Districts'facilities from ICDC's discharge, pursuant to Section 613 of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations, the Districts has the authority to suspend sewer service when the Districts' General Manager determines that such a condition exists. If the construction of Peters Canyon is not completed by that date, the temporary capacity rights and Special Purpose Discharge Permit may be extended on terms mutually agreeable to IRWD and District No. 14. It is our understanding that the request to discharge to the sewer system is not long-term. ALTERNATIVES There are no other feasible options available to discharge the requested groundwater. CEQA FINDINGS N/A MT:mb H:%Wp.dt kV 590Ne %Apanda.PateMCWyon.dw Paget ATTACHMENTS OMTS Committee: 1. Copy of agreement' Joint Boards: 1. Copy of agreement MT:mb H:\wpAlausx359mamm,Aganda.Palen:Canyon.doc Page e AGREEMENT RE TEMPORARY DISCHARGE FROM IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into to be effective the first day of 1998. by and between County Sanitation District No. 1 for itself and as agent for County Sanitation District Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, (hereinafter either individually or collectively referred to as "CSDOC"); and Irvine Ranch Water District, (hereinafter referred to as "IRWD"). RECITALS WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California (hereinafter referred to as "District 14") is a duly organized County Sanitation District owning and maintaining sewerage facilities serving its territory, and is one of nine member Sanitation Districts comprising CSDOC, which collectively operate as a Joint Administrative Organization, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California; WHEREAS, IRWD is organized and existing pursuant to the California Water District Law, California Water Cade section 34000 et. seq.; WHEREAS, Irvine Community Development Company (hereinafter referred to as "ICDC") is involved in the construction of the Peters Canyon Wash Channel Improvement Projects (Peters Canyon). During this project, ICDC will be constructing improvements to the Peters Canyon Wash, including excavation to lower and widen the channel cross section. Due to the existence of shallow groundwater in the vicinity, dewatering will be necessary during construction of such channel improvements. ICDC has requested that it be allowed to discharge groundwater from the dewatering activity into the sewerage system located within District 14. It is presently anticipated that the discharge rate will be 1,000 gallons per minute ("gpm") during the term of this Agreement. WHEREAS, District 14 and IRWD intend to charge ICDC for the reasonable cost related to the conveyance, treatment and disposal of the groundwater discharge. WHEREAS, wastewater originating within IRWD's service area in the vicinity of the Project is presently discharged to CSDOC's collection treatment and disposal facilities and flows through and is measured at CSDOC's Main Street pump station. District 14 presently invoices IRWD for CSDOC's costs of providing conveyance, treatment and disposal costs of this wastewater discharge. I WHEREAS, District 14 and IRWD intend that IRWD be invoiced separately for CSDOC's conveyance, treatment and disposal costs related to ICDC's groundwater discharge to the sewerage system. WHEREAS, the presently existing agreements between IRWD and CSDOC, including District 14, do not provide a satisfactory formula for calculation of costs for conveyance, treatment and disposal of the proposed groundwater discharge. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows: AGREEMENT Section 1. Through the Special Purpose Discharge Permit, which District 14 intends to issue to ICDC, District 14 shall require that ICDC measure the flow,on a daily basis, and the strength (biochemical oxygen demand ("BOD") and Suspended Solids), on a monthly basis, of the groundwater discharged by ICDC to the sewerage system and provide to District 14 and IRWD the flow and strength measurements. The permit shall require ICDC to provide these measurements on a monthly basis, within thirty (30) days following the end of each month. Section 2. CSDOC shall invoice IRWD for CSDOC's cost of conveyance, treatment and disposal of the discharge by ICDC separately from all other wastewater discharges from IRWD's service area measured by CSDOC at the Main Street pump station. CSDOC shall deduct from the flow measurements through the Main Street pump station, on which IRWD's share of District 14's operating and capital costs are calculated, the flow amount attributable to the discharge from ICDC. Section 3. The charges to IRWD for the discharge by ICDC shall be based upon the flow and strength (BOD and Suspended Solids) of the groundwater discharged to the sewerage system. The flow and strength shall be determined based upon (1) the monthly data submitted to District 14 and IRWD by ICDC and (2) any other flow and/or strength data obtained by IRWD or District 14. The charges to IRWD shall be calculated based upon the following: (1) $263.32 per million gallons of flow•, (2) $118.03 per thousand pounds of BOD; and (3) $92.92 per thousand pounds of Suspended Solids. Section 4. CSDOC shall lease to IRWD temporary capacity rights to transport the groundwater discharge of ICDC from District 14 to the Joint Works Treatment Facilities jointly owned and operated by CSDOC during the term of this Agreement. Section 5. IRWD shall pay to CSDOC rent for the temporary capacity right as provided for in Section 4 above, which shall be calculated based on the average daily flow during the term of this Agreement. The formula for determining such rent will be determined as follows: 2 • Number of months during term of this Agreement/12 x Flow, GPD'/399, GPD x CFC'x 0.58/25 years. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, IRWD shall pay to CSDOC estimated rent for the temporary capacity right, based on the estimated average flow of 1.44 million gallons per day discharged by ICDC. This estimated rent shall be in the amount of $197.601. At the end of the term of this Agreement, CSDOC shall adjust the rent charge based on the actual flow discharged by ICDC. Section 6. The temporary capacity right granted herein shall terminate on the earlier of(1) May 1, 1999, or(2) the date of completion of the project improvements by ICDC and acceptance thereof by Orange County Flood Control District. If the construction of the Project is not completed by May 1, 1999, the temporary capacity rights and Special Purpose Discharge Permit may be extended on terms mutually agreeable to IRWD and CSDOC. Section 7. ICDC has been issued NPDES discharge permits allowing it to discharge surface stormwaters as well as groundwater meeting quality standards established by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, into approved flood control/stormwater channels. However, the Special Purpose Discharge Permit issued by District 14 shall contain a provision precluding ICDC from discharging surface stormwater to the sewerage system. Section 8. No benefit to any third party is intended by this Agreement. Section 9. The parties to this Agreement recognize that during stormwater events, high flows to CSDOC treatment facilities may create significant operational problems for CSDOC. Therefore, pursuant to the authority set forth in Section 613 of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance), District 14 shall include in the Special Purpose Discharge Permit issued to ICDC a provision whereby ICDC acknowledges that CSDOC may direct that all groundwater discharges by ICDC shall immediately cease H CSDOC determines that flow levels in the sewerage system may cause operational problems for CSDOC. The permit shall require that CSDOC provide to ICDC notice by telephone, or any other method reasonable to alert ICDC of CSDOC's direction, that the groundwater discharge cease and, subsequently, notice when the discharge may resume. GPD=Gallons Per Day ' CFC=Capital Facilities Connection Charge,which for the purpose of this Agreement is$2,360.00. 3 SIGNATURES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed in duplicate in the name of the respective parties, by their duly authorized officers, effective as of the day and year first written above. IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT By: Ronald E. Young General Manager By: Leslie Flessel Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joan C. Arneson BOWIE, ARNESON, KADI, WILES & GIANNONE Attorneys for Irvine Ranch Water District COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR ITSELF AND AS AGENT FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By: Chairman, Board of Directors By: Secretary, Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: Thomas L. Woodruff General Counsel for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California H:\wp.dlaVS3590ftw"m RWDAGR.doc 4 9; F OMTS COMMITTEE Meedng Date To 2L 8C . 411198 4122/98 AGENDA REPORT I IMmNomb [em ;eype w,rsSX-ef /Y-F- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Originator. George Robertson, Supervisor, ECM SUBJECT: OCEAN MONITORING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY'S 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1). Award a 68—month professional services contract to Science Applications International Corporation to conduct the "Core Monitoring" portion of the Districts' newly issued ocean monitoring program. 2). Approve the proposed fixed-price amount of$984,638.00 for the first 20- month program segment. SUMMARY The Districts solicited competitive bids for the "Core Monitoring" program element of its new ocean monitoring program, required under our ocean discharge permit. This is a 68-month contract consisting of five, overlapping 20-month sampling and reporting segments. Staff evaluated three options for the contract: (1) award a 68- month contract that included the cost for the entire contract period with a cost escalation mechanism; (2) award a 68-month contract with the prices for each of the five overlapping program segments negotiated annually and brought to the Board for approval; and (3) put the contract out to bid each year. The procurement process used was the second option as the one that would provide the most cost-effective approach and the greatest program continuity. Four companies responded: (1) Aquatic Bioassay and Consulting Laboratories, Inc.; (2) Battelle Memorial Institute; (3) MBC Applied Environmental Services; and (4) Science Applications International Corporation. Science Applications International Corporation received the highest technical rating from the Districts' ocean monitoring proposal review panel and they had the lowest proposed price of the companies considered after the technical evaluation was complete. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed cost of services for the first of five environmental sampling and reporting program segment(20 months) is $984,638.00. rv.eoma.nw.emeasswoxvowmw>isae nam aepon Foam ao< eM,.e vsree Page 1 s BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 53, 1998-1999 JO Budget) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This is a compliance budget item. The cost for the first ocean monitoring program segment is spread over a 20-month period. The estimated cost impact to 1998-1999 Joint Operating Budget is $595,000 (approximately 60% of the 20-month contract price) and has been budgeted for on Line 53 (Environmental Monitoring) in Environmental Compliance and Monitoring's proposed fiscal year 1998-1999 Joint Operating Budget. The residual $389,638 will impact and be budgeted for in Environmental Compliance and Monitorng's fiscal year 1999-2000 Joint Operating Budget along with the prorated cost for the second ocean monitoring program segment. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Proposal Evaluation In November 1997, the Districts placed the ocean monitoring program out for competitive bids. This is a 68-month contract consisting of five, overlapping 20- month sampling and reporting segments. In January 1998, the Districts received four bids that consisted of a technical proposal and a separately sealed price proposal. A panel of six reviewers—three Districts' employees and three non- Districts' employees—evaluated the technical proposals. The outside reviewers included a Biologist II, a Senior Environmental Scientist and a Laboratory Manager II. All of the reviewers were experienced in environmental monitoring. The individual panelists first reviewed the proposals for technical merit and rated each company. The panel then met to discuss their evaluations and establish a final, overall technical ranking agreed to by all panel members. Once the technical evaluations and rankings were completed, the panel placed the proposals into three tiers. The panel placed Aquatic Bioassay and Consulting Laboratories, Inc, into Tier 3 and eliminated the company from further consideration on technical merit. MBC Applied Environmental Services was rated clearly behind Science Applications International Corporation and Battelle Memorial Institute and was placed into Tier 2. The panel determined that neither of the Tier 2 or Tier 3 companies met the Districts' technical criteria to conduct the ocean monitoring program. Table 1 contains both the technical rankings and tier groupings for all four companies. After deliberations, all six reviewers agreed that Science Applications International Corporation was the best qualified company, technically, to carry out the Districts' ocean monitoring program and was, therefore, rated Number 1 overall by the review panel. With Battelle Memorial Institute and Science Applications International Corporation as the two companies remaining under consideration, the separate, WaddnNalalMy Agenda Reede Form do RM.w 11s Page 2 sealed price proposals were opened and reviewed. Science Applications International Corporation had the lowest (by $209,626) price proposal as shown in Table 1. Table 1. Review panel's company rankings, tier groupings and the proposed cost of services. Company Technical Tier Proposed Cost of Rank Services Science Applications 1 1 $984,638 International Corporation Battelle Memorial Institute 2 1 $1,194,264 MBC Applied Environmental 3 2 $998,685 Services Aquatic Bioassay and q 3 $720,807 Consulting Laboratories, Inc. Review Panel Recommendation Science Applications International Corporation received the highest technical rating and had the lowest price proposal. The review panel recommends awarding the professional services contract for ocean monitoring of the Districts' ocean discharge to Science Applications International Corporation for a cost not to exceed $984.638.00. ALTERNATIVES None. This contract is necessary to carry out the Districts'federal and state mandated ocean monitoring program. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1) Purchase Requisition - 2) Contract %WdunW. 1+ .ela%uswveaNe PMe_nyenda Rep nFar-dw Rowed: 1rs Page 3 1 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue V Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday. April 2. 1998, at 5:30 P.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on April 2, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present at 6:25 p.m., as follows: Present: Staff Present: Bumie Dunlap, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Shirley Dettloff, Vice Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Brian Donahue John Linder, Construction Manager Patsy Marshall Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Eva Miner-Bradford Bob Ooten, Dir. Of Operations & Maintenance Todd Spitzer Chris Dahl, Director of Information Technology Jerry Jones, Maintenance Manager Absent Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor John Collins Doug Cook, Chief Operator Mary Ann Jones Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer Christina Shea Chuck Hodge, Engineer Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair John Swindler, IT Supervisor Bob Zemel Gail Cain, Executive Assistant Others: John Cavanaugh, General Counsel Ashwani K. Wason, Carollo Engineers John Dettle, DGA Consultants, Inc. Don Greek, DGA Consultants, Inc. Dick Mangan, Mangan, Inc. Bill Gabris, Westin Engineering Alan Came, Westin Engineering APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 2 April 2, 1998 PUBLIC COMMENTS Westin Engineering asked to address the Committee regarding Item No. 3, PDC98-11. The Chair advised the Committee members that a copy of Westin's protest letter(attached) had been distributed to each of them before the PDC Committee Meeting. The Chair also advised he would defer the public comment until the item was presented later in the evening. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the March 5, 1998 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager advised that the budget is going very well this year. The FIS system has provided an abundance of information enabling the budgets to be more comprehensive and complete. With respect to our operating cost for last month, we were$36 below our estimated average cost because of the high flows in February. This will probably result in a $5 decrease by the end of the year because of that one month. We hosted a City Managers' meeting on Thursday, March 26. There was extensive discussion about Inflow and Infiltration, and the importance of educating everyone on how critical I & I is to our operating and peaking problems. We agreed to have a follow-up meeting with their Public Works Director, and their water and sewer staff at a later date. That meeting will probably be on a weekday, rather than the weekend. It is planned to provide a three-hour overview of the Strategic Plan. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager was not present. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering had no report. / Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 3 April 2, 1998 REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Director of Engineering discussed the reports. INFORMATIONAL ITEM (Item Nos. 1-2) 1. PDC98-09: Information item only. Modification in Reporting Change Order Status Reporting. Staff advised that a Change Order Breakdown Status Report will be provided to the Committee on a quarterly basis. The new status report will be in addition to the current monthly and quarterly change order reports. 2. PDC98-10: Information item only. Receive and File Office and Plant Computerization Overview presentation. Chris Dahl, Director of Information Technologies, presented an overview of Information Technologies. Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager, presented an overview of Plant Automation. ACTION ITEMS (Item No. 3) 3. PDC98-11: Approve Professional Services Agreement for Plant Automation & Reinvention, Phase 1, Job No. J-42, with Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. for$6,118,499. Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, gave a presentation on the Plant Reinvention Project (J-42). David Ludwin, the Director of Engineering, described the consultant selection process and the justification for recommending Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. Bill Gabris, of Westin Engineering, addressed the Committee regarding their protest of the staffs recommendation to award a Professional Services Agreement to Parsons Engineering Science, Inc. CLOSED SESSION Chairman Dunlap announced to the Directors the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9, in order to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda regarding the Professional Services Agreement for Plant Automation & Reinvention Project, Job No. J-42. He reported that the item could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) upon a two thirds' vote of the Committee. No other item would be discussed or acted upon. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 4 April 2, 1998 Upon the unanimous vote of all members present to add an item to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), the Committee convened in closed session at 7:40 p.m. At 8:10 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to reject the recommendation of the Engineering Staff, with the direction to reissue the Request for Proposal for said project. Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final. ACTION ITEMS (Rem Nos. 4-7) 4. PDC98-12: Adopt a policy to allow the General Manager to approve construction change orders that include time extensions. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly monied to recommend approval. 5. PDC98-13: Direct staff to discontinue working on the 66 kV Substation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-52. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. 6. POC98-14: 1)Approve an increase in authorized funds of$1,104,106 for Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Project No. J-34-1, bringing the project total to $8,259,106 to cover all previous and anticipated costs required to complete construction; and 2)Approve an increase in authorized funds of$229,632 for Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2, Project No. 152-35-5, bringing the project total to $1,455,632 to cover all previous and anticipated costs required to complete construction. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. 7. PDC98-15: 1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 and Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. 3-35R-1 with Mike Priich 8 Sons for Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue in the net amount of$245,736; 2) Approve an increase to the budget in the amount of$258,479; and 3)Accept Contract 3-35R-1 as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approve final closeout agreement with Mike Pdich 8 Sons. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 5 April 2, 1998 MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Director Eva Miner-Bradford requested that staff place on a future Agenda an item discussing consultants' overhead costs. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 7, 1998. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Submitted by: Gail Cain Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Secretary HWWA�eaww Attachment Ali11A TUR Westin Engineering, Inc 2512 Chambers Road,Suite 201 Tustin,California 92780 (714)838-3620 Fax(714)838-0853 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1 April 1998 10844 Ellis avenue Fountain Valley,California 92708-7018 Attn: Mr.David Ludwin P.E.;Director of Engineering Subject: Protest of Proposed Contract Award of J-42 Plant Reinvention Project to Parsons The purpose of this letter is to infonn you of Westin's protest of the award to Parsons of the J-42 Plant Reinvention Project.We are protesting the Districts' selection methodology based on the fact that the evaluation and selection process has been flawed. The evaluation criteria have been applied arbitrarily and capriciously to eliminate from negotiations the recommended consultant,Westin,by comparing Westin's price to the price of a non-compliant offering,Parsons',with the argument that the price difference could not be justified to the Board.This imposes a different selection criterion than the Districts had stated in the RFP. Changing the selection criteria after the proposals had been submitted arbitrarily excluded the very competitor who had adhered most scrupulously to the stated evaluation criteria,and who had provided the most compliant offering, Westin. Compounding this irregularity,after the Districts learned that Parsons' original proposal was not compliant,the Districts allowed Parsons to increase its proposed scope of work to become compliant,and at the same time to increase its price. By the time these changes were factored in,Parsons' price became comparable to or greater than Westin's for the same scope of work. This clearly indicates that the discontinuation of negotiations with Westin was an error.Still,the Districts have not resumed those negotiations. The following are the particular,relevant facts: 1. The Districts discontinued negotiations with Westin based upon a price comparison with Parsons non RFP compliant bid. 2. Parsons was allowed to increase their bid price by over$1.7 million or almost 40%to be RFP compliant. 3. Westin has not been allowed to respond to the scope of work negotiated with Parsons. During the negotiations between the Districts and Westin,the primary focus was on the comparative total labor hours and costs between Westin and the other bidders,but primarily in comparison to Parson low bid of$4A million.Westin was led to believe that its price would have to be reduced in the range of $2 million in order to be close to the Parsons bid since the Districts stated that it would not be able to justify a $2 million plus price disparity to the Board.During the contract negotiations, Westin presented a number of cost reduction ideas in the range of$0.6 million for project management,the reinvention workshops, and the as-builting.However,since the total reductions left Westin's bid significantly above Parsons original and invalidated bid,negotiations with Westin were discontinued and Westin was not allowed to submit a final revised price. The Districts also rejected Westin's written request to resume contract negotiations. Westin was also told by the Districts that the hours(and costs)of Parsons, Malcolm Pirtle, Montgomery Watson were"clustered",and the true scope of work and costs had to be this range. Westin argued,to no avail,that none of the other three firms had bid to the required scope of work and assumptions in the RFP. An Employee Owned Company Offices Worldwide � t County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1 April 1998 Mr.David Ludwin P.E.;Director of Engineering Page 2 Following the cessation of contract negotiations with Westin, Westin confirmed that the labor hours and costing proposed by Malcolm Pimie and Montgomery Watson were indeed based on assumptions that provided significantly less than the requirements in the RFP.During the Districts' negotiations with Parsons,the Districts discovered that the Parsons' proposal was also based on non RFP compliant assumptions of a limited field verification effort and an incomplete scope of work. Since exact quantities, and the requirement of 1000/6 accuracy was explicitly stated in the RFP,the Parsons bid was clearly non- responsive and should have been rejected at that point.Instead the Districts allowed Parsons to increase their bid by$1.7 million or almost 40% .In addition,the cessation of negotiations with Westin was allowed to stand even though that previous decision was based on now confirmed information that Parsons' original bid was non compliant. By allowing Parsons to increase their original bid price to correct their non compliant bid,the Districts effectively penalized Westin,the most careful and diligent bidder, who played by the rules,and found itself to have relied on those tales to its detriment. Although the final contract value with Parsons includes three additional work scope items,the affect of this additional scope on Westin's bid was less than 3%. Based on a review of the discussion in the PDC Committee Agenda Report concerning the subject"Professional Services Agreement for Plant automation &Reinvention Project,Job Number J-42"Westin understands that the final scope of work for the J-42 project was expanded from the original scope stated in the RFP to include the following major items: 1. Include a professional facilitator to assist with the reinvention workshops. 2. Establish a J-42 project intranet for all project documents and reports 3. Apply bar code tags(an asset tag and a process tag)to each of approximately 25,000 instruments and pieces of field equipment. Coordinate tags with the District's CMMS. During the contract negotiations between Westin and the Districts,our response to these additional scope items was as follows: 1. Westin's proposal already included the services of a facilitator for the reinvention workshops. 2. We agree to establish a J-42 project intranet at no additional cost. 3. The labor hours and cost estimate for applying bar code tags to each of the approximately 25,000 instruments and pieces of equipment was estimated to be$187,000. Based on the above,Westin is submitting a revised price quotation for the J-42 Plant Reinvention Project in the amount of$6,096,311 million. Res ectively submitted, William cabris Director, Southern California Operations Westin Engineering cc: Mr.Blake Anderson Mr.Burnie Dunlap;PDC Chair Mr.John Collins; PDC Joint Chair Mr. Michael Harrison ESQ PDC COMMITTEE MeeE^g Da a To aa. 9/7/93 9/27/93 AGENDA REPORT Item Numpe Item NumE IPDC9 -12 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineers Originator: John Linder , Constructio Manager SUBJECT: Resolution No. 97-37. Approval of Construction Change Orders by the General Manager GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt a policy to allow the General Manager to approve construction change orders that include time extensions. SUMMARY Currently the General Manager is authorized to approve any single change order up to $50,000 and the PDC Committee is authorized to approve any single change order up to $100,000. However, the Resolution which established the policies and procedures for Change Order approval (changed to ratification by the PDC Committee) did not include statements relative to time extensions associated with the change order. We believe that it would be appropriate to clarify the intent of the resolution as it is applied to change order approval. On many occasions, additional time is needed to accomplish added work which in turn, is the basis for a change order. During the period of the 1997 calendar year there were five contracts completed and ten active contracts not closed out. Of the fifteen contracts, there have been eighteen change orders approved by the General Manager. Six of the General Manager approved change orders included time extensions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following information may clarify the relationship between change order time extensions and liquidated damages. JDL'.k G.ntglobal agenda`draftrepoM1srpdc%gendaReport97.37,dm All construction contracts specify a fixed amount of time in calendar days to complete the contract. Also included in the contract specifications are a fixed amount of liquidated damages to be assessed if the contract is not completed per the specified time. For instance, a contract may specify 300 calendar days for completion and liquidated damaged of $500 per day. If the Contractor completes the contract in 310 calendar days, he is subject to an assessment of$5,000 in liquidated damages (10 days x $500.). The $5,000 would be deducted from the original contract amount by a change order. If we told the contractor to accomplish some additional work that took 10 days to complete past the original 300 days, the contractor would be not be assessed the liquidated damages. A change order, however, would still be required. ALTERNATIVES Leave Status Quo or adopt or approve a modified version of the recommendation. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 97-37 2. Sample of change order to be approved by General Manager JDL:lc G:nlgloba0agendaWrallrepads\pdclagendaRepor197J7.dac RESOLUTION NO. 97-37 ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR: SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL. ENVIRONMENTAL LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES- APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDERS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR: (1) SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES; (2) APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS; AND (3) APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDERS; AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS NOS. 90-43, 94-110 AND 95-9 WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts have, in the interest of uniformity, fairness and cost effectiveness undertaken to establish policies and procedures for the selection and procurement of professional engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section : General Provisions This Resolution establishes a procedure to be followed in the selection and retention of professional consultants in the areas of engineering, architecture, environmental, land surveying, construction management services and related services. Professional Technical Consultants are those individuals or firms providing engineering, architectural, environmental or land surveying services which are those professional services associated with research, development, design and construction, alteration, or repair of real property, as well as incidental services that members of these professions and those in their employ may logically orjustifably perform, including studies, investigations, surveys, evaluations, consultations, planning, programming, conceptual 2osa,ro -1- 12/1 a/97 sw,z , i designs, plans and specifications, cost estimates, inspections, shop drawing reviews, sample recommendations, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, and other related services. Services for product testing are excluded. It is recognized that no two individuals or firms have equal skills, training, or experience and that the qualities of such persons vary. Accordingly, professional consultants shall be selected based upon the Districts' discretion and opinion as to which particular consultant is best qualified to perform the work (hereinafter referred to as ,.projects") in question. For purposes of this Resolution, "firm' shall mean any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity permitted by law to practice the profession of architecture, engineering, environmental services, land surveying, or construction project management. Evaluation and selection of a consultant firm will include but not be limited to the following: A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional standing, its members being of good moral character, and it shall be prepared to submit references from persons of known repute. B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm must be registered in the Slate of California, as required by law. C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least ten years' recent experience in responsible charge of work of the type involved in the project. D. At least two additional members of the firm's staff must have at least five years' experience in responsible charge in the field, or fields, required by the project. E. The firm shall be capable of performing the work within the prescribed time limitations considering the current and planned work loads of the firm. F. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given to a local based firm when more than one firm is being considered. G. A firm selected must certify to having an equal opportunity employment program. The Districts also recognize that the scope of services and the qualifications of consultants can differ significantly between major capital facilities projects and small capital projects. The criteria set forth in Paragraphs C and D above may be waived by Districts for small capital projects. 20 Iw 5 13 1 -2- 12/18/97 The procedures set forth in this Resolution shall govern the retention of such professional consultants. Section 2: Small Capital Protects: Annual Budget Upon approval from the Boards of Directors of an annual budget, Districts' staff shall be authorized to solicit contract proposals with professional engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management firms for all small capital projects as defined and as prescribed herein. Section . Small Capital Projects: Approval of Plans and Specifications The Boards of Directors delegate to the Director of Engineering, as a Professional Registered Engineer, the authority to approve the design, plans and specifications for construction of new or modified Districts' facilities that are deemed small capital projects, as defined in Section 4A below. Section 4: Small Capital Projects: Selection of Consultants - Procedure A. "Small capital projects" is defined as a miscellaneous capital improvements and facility modifications, replacement or repairs project related to plant safety, reliability and efficiency enhancements where professional consulting services are estimated to be in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for each project. B. Districts' staff shall compile a master pre-approved list of 5-10 firms having the required expertise to perform the service for a small project. The master list of firms will be selected annually based upon a solicitation, review of qualifications and Board approval. Thereafter, the Department Director shall be authorized to recommend to the General Manager, execution of an annual professional consulting services agreement with each of the parties designated on the approved master list. The professional consulting services agreement for each party on the master list shall be forwarded to the purchasing office which, upon request of the Department Director, shall prepare the appropriate requisition documentation to insure future payment to the consultant. As a need for an individual specific project arises, the District will implement the Agreement by the issuing of its standard form purchase order identifying the speck project by name and number and including the approved scope of work required of the consultant for the project. The scope of work for any individual project, as identified in the purchase order, shall not entail a cost in excess of $50,000.00, with an annual limitation of$200,000.00 for all purchase orders under the provisions of Section 3 of this Resolution, for any one consultant. 2a lw swu 7 _3_ 12/18/97 C. The Department Director shall first obtain at least two (2) price proposals from consultants before the subject scope of work and purchase order is awarded to a consultant. This requirement may be waived at the discretion of the Department Director, with the concurrence of the General Manager and consent of the District Chair or Vice Chair(which shall be confirmed in writing), where a determination is made that the subject work is unique such that only one (1) consultant is available to perform the work, or where significant time constraints or emergency conditions dictate that one (1) consultant be solicited for price. The Department Director, or his designee, shall review the proposals specifically addressing qualifications, cost and ability to meet District schedule requirements. Based on the evaluations, the Department Director is authorized to award the project purchase order. D. Once the consultant is selected for the award of a small capital project and the purchase order is executed by the District, the Department Director shall issue the notice to proceed. Section 5: Major Capital Projects: Scope A. For every project approved by the Board(s), and for which outside services are required, the District staff shall develop a comprehensive scope of work. B. The scope shall define the extent of the services and the time required. Section 6: Major Capital Projects: Selection of Consultants - Procedure For any professional consulting services where the procedures of Sections 2, 3, and 4 are not utilized, the following procedures shall apply: For professional consulting services to be rendered on a single project that will exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), the following procedures shall be followed: A. Proposals - Notice Renuesting. Staff shall prepare a Request for Proposal ("RFP") or a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") for the scope of work which shall include a request for the firm's qualifications, personnel capability, demonstration of firm's capabilities, identification of personnel assigned to the project, estimate of number of hours for each aspect of the project, fee proposals and conflict of interest disclaimer. The Request for Qualifications' process may be used, at Staffs discretion, to narrow the field of firms submitting proposals on the project. Districts shall maintain a comprehensive list of professional consultants' demonstrated competence. Notice shall be mailed to all firths requesting notice of any RFP or RFQ issued by the District. m nLi -4- 12/18/97 1 Optionally, notice may be given by publication in professional journals or publications of general circulation. B. Staff Screening Committee. A screening committee of at least two(2) staff members as chosen by the Department Director shall review all submitted proposals and select at least three (3)firms who appear fully qualified for submittal to the respective Selection Committee or District Board, as described in Paragraph D below for further evaluation and selection. C. Proposals - Contents. Proposals submitted shall: (1) Acknowledge the scope of the project and extent of the services required. (2) Include a description of the firm's qualifications for performing the proposed work. (3) In the case of a proposal for construction management services, each firm shall provide evidence that its personnel that will carry out on-site responsibilities have expertise and experience in construction project design review and evaluation, construction mobilization and supervision, bid evaluation, project scheduling, cost-benefit analysis, claims review and negotiation, and general management and administration of a construction project. (4) Include past performance records of the firm. (5) Demonstrate the firm's capabilities to complete the work within the time allotted. (6) Identify the specific key personnel to be assigned to the project. (7) Provide an estimate of the number of hours involved in each aspect of the scope of work for such personnel. (8) Be accompanied by a sealed fee proposal estimate which shall not be opened until the firm is selected as being qualified. Thereafter, it shall be the basis, for procurement negotiations. 20 1W S 13 1 -5- 12178/97 The forth of the fee proposal shall be as described in ' Subsections F2 and F3 below. (9) Contain a conflict of interest disclaimer. (10) Provide any other information required to properly evaluate the firm's qualifications and familiarity with the types of problems applicable to the project. D. Selection Committee - Membership. 1. Joint Works. (a) The members of the Board of Directors Standing Committee principally responsible for the project and contract under consideration for approval shall constitute the Selection Committee for Joint Works projects. (b) At the discretion of the Joint Chairman, additional Directors may be appointed to the Committee to assist in the consideration of proposals for specific projects. 2. Individual Districts. (a) Districts with three member Boards: The Selection Committee of a District with a three member Board shall be comprised of the Chairman of the District and a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or his designee. (b) Districts with more than a three member Board: The Selection Committee of a District with more than a three member Board shall be comprised of the Chairman and Chairman Pro Tern of the District, and a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or his designee. E. Review of Proposals by Staff Committee and Selection Committee. 1. The Staff Committee shall review each proposal and the qualifications of each firm with due consideration of office location, reputation in the professional community, experience, both generally and specifically on similar-type projects, the project approach, understanding of the scope of work, financial standing, number of qualified personnel and their availability for the project, quality of references, work load and other factors relevant to the project being considered. 100 -6- 112t8r97 2. The Staff Committee, upon completion of their evaluation of all proposals, shall determine those firms deemed to be fully qualified to provide the services sought by District based on their demonstrated competence and qualifications. 3. The Staff Committee, upon making a determination of the fully qualified firths, shall rank the firms considered, in order of preference, based upon the qualification of each, as described in Paragraph 6E1 above. Thereafter the Committee shall open the sealed fee proposal of the qualified firms. Based upon the fee proposal, the committee may recommend to the Selection Committee or the Board(s) of Directors an individual or firm for award of the contract which is not ranked higher than firms with higher fee proposals. 4. The Selection Committee shall receive and review the recommendation of the Staff Committee and either award or recommend to the Joint Boards or the individual District Board, either the approval or disapproval of the Staff recommendation to award a contract, as authorized in Section 7 below. F. Procurement and Negotiation of Agreement. To determine the firm to be selected and the compensation for the services sought, the following procedures will be strictly adhered to: 1. The Staff Committee will, at its discretion, invite the firm that is considered to be the best qualified to appear before the Staff Committee. 2. The proposal for fees associated with the services as submitted by the selected firm shall be presented in sufficient detail to enable the Staff Committee to adequately ascertain the level of effort associated with the scope of work and to determine whether the firm has thoroughly identified the efforts associated with the services and thoroughly understands the work required. 3. The basis of the fee shall be: Cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum amount, a per diem rate(s) with a maximum amount, or a lump sum (fixed) fee. 4. If it is the decision of the Staff Committee to use methods for compensation other than the lump sum or cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum, or the per diem rates with a maximum, justifications for this decision shall be made by the Staff Committee in its me1W �„ 1 -7- 12/18/97 recommendation to the Selection Committee and the Board($) of Directors for the services. 5. The Staff Committee shall review the compensation requested by the firm which shall be compared with the maximum fee as previously established. 6. The final negotiated fee, as recommended to the Selection Committee and Board(s) of Directors, shall be certified by the Staff Committee as reasonable for the services requested and not resulting in excessive profits for the firm. 7. If agreement is not reached, the negotiations should be terminated and similar interviews should then follow with the next-ranked firm. 8. All such negotiations shall be on a strictly confidential basis and in no case shall the compensation discussed with one firm be discussed with another. G. Continuation of Services. 1. In some instances where a qualified firm has satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of a project and the Board(s) determines that it is in the best interests of the District(s) to retain the same firth for subsequent phases of related work, the Staff Committee or the Selection Committee may be authorized to proceed directly with negotiations with that firm for the additional work 2. Continuation of services may arise when a firm has completed a feasibility report or a preliminary engineering report and the services for said work are satisfactory to the Board(s) and the procedure of examining other firms for subsequent phases is not deemed necessary or cost effective. 3. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for price cannot be concluded under these circumstances, negotiations should be terminated and the provisions set forth hereinabove for selection of a firm would apply. H. Specialized Services. 1. In the event that specialized services are required where it is determined that only one qualified firm can best perform the services for a specific project in an amount greater than $50,000.00, the Staff Committee, in the case where the fees are greater than $50,000.00, x0saia0 swig i -8- 12/18/97 will report to the Selection Committee said findings and request authority to negotiate directly with the particular specialized firm. 2. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or individual under Section 61-11 above, along with the negotiated fee, shall be presented to the Board(s) of Directors for consideration. I. Agreement for Services. 1. Upon approval by the Board(s) of a negotiated agreement for professional services, a contract shall be executed in a form approved by the General Counsel. 2. The contract shall include, but not be limited to the following terms: (a) A statement of the scope of the project. (b) The basis and individual elements of the fees. (c) The basis for payment to the firm. (d) The time limits in which the services must be performed. (a) Provisions for fee adjustments should there be changes in the scope of work. (f) ff it is determined by the Selection Committee that the Districts may be caused to incur a penalty or liability, or suffer a loss because of the failure of the firm to perform the work within specified time limits, the contract shall include a clause setting forth penalties for such nonperformance or delayed performance, in amounts to be determined by the Committee. (g) For projects exceeding $50,000 in fees or in other cases as determined by the Districts, errors and omissions insurance in an amount recommended by the General Counsel (based upon engineering data from the Department Director) shall be required, unless the Standing Committee or District's Board, as the case may be, waives said insurance. 3. Progress payments made to the firm during the time the services are being supplied shall be based on the work completed to date, as recommended by the responsible staff member. 2 s 1W 5 q 1 -9- 12/18197 C J. Conflict of Interest. 1. The District(s) maintain a Conflict of Interest Code, pursuant to California Government Code Section 87100 at e ., which governs the activities and performance of duties of its officers, employees or agents in the conduct of project work for the Districts. 2. No Director, officer, employee or agent shall solicit or accept rebates, kickbacks, favors or other unlawful consideration from any individual or firm on behalf of any firm that may be potentially selected as a qualified firm to provide professional consulting services to the District. Acceptance of food and refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions and acceptance of gratuities or gifts shall not be deemed a violation of this provision, provided that if said items exceed $260.00 in value, in a calendar year, the Director, officer, employee or agent may be disqualified from participating in the decision pursuant to Article III of the District's Conflict of Interest Code; and provided further, that any Director, officer, employee or agent, as a designated employee under the District's Conflict of Interest Code, has reported said gifts on his/her annual Statement of Economic Interest as required by said Code. 3. Any firm seeking selection under these procedures that violates the District(s) Conflict of Interest Cade shall be automatically disqualified. Section 7: Award of Professional Services Agreements for Maior Capital Projects A. Professional Consulting Services. The award and execution of an agreement for professional consulting services on behalf of the Districts shall be made in accordance with the following delegations of authority: Authorizing Authority Authorized Action 1. Department Heads Solicitation of Requests for Qualifications ("RFQ") and Requests for Proposals (RFP"). 2. General Manager Authorization to evaluate proposals and to execute contracts up to $25,000. 3. OMTS, PDC, or FAHR Receive recommendations of Staff and Committee (or Standing General Manager, and approve Profes- (Committees) sional Services Agreements of over $25,000 up to $50,000. '0910° -10- 12t18/97 sso,a , V will report to the Selection Committee said findings and request authority to negotiate directly with the particular specialized firm. 2. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or individual under Section 61-11 above, along with the negotiated fee, shall be presented to the Board(s) of Directors for consideration. I. Agreement for Services. 1. Upon approval by the Board(s) of a negotiated agreement for professional services, a contract shall be executed in a form approved by the General Counsel. 2. The contract shall include, but not be limited to the following terms: (a) A statement of the scope of the project. (b) The basis and individual elements of the fees. (c) The basis for payment to the firm. (d) The time limits in which the services must be performed. (e) Provisions for fee adjustments should there be changes in the scope of work. (f) If it is determined by the Selection Committee that the Districts may be caused to incur a penalty or liability, or suffer a loss because of the failure of the firm to perform the work within specified time limits, the contract shall include a clause setting forth penalties for such nonperformance or delayed performance, in amounts to be determined by the Committee. (g) For projects exceeding $50,000 in fees or in other cases as determined by the Districts, errors and omissions insurance in an amount recommended by the General Counsel (based upon engineering data from the Department Director) shall be required, unless the Standing Committee or District's Board, as the case may be, waives said insurance. 3. Progress payments made to the firm during the time the services are being supplied shall be based on the work completed to date, as recommended by the responsible staff member. 20�'t� -9- 1 v18Vs7 n J. Conflict of Interest. 1. The District(s) maintain a Conflict of Interest Code, pursuant to California Government Code Section 87100 at sea., which governs the activities and performance of duties of its officers, employees or agents in the conduct of project work for the Districts. 2. No Director, officer, employee or agent shall solicit or accept rebates, kickbacks,favors or other unlawful consideration from any individual or firm on behalf of any firm that may be potentially selected as a qualified firm to provide professional consulting services to the District. Acceptance of food and refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions and acceptance of gratuities or gifts shall not be deemed a violation of this provision, provided that if said items exceed $260.00 in value, in a calendar year, the Director, officer, employee or agent may be disqualified from participating in the decision pursuant to Article III of the District's Conflict of Interest Code; and provided further, that any Director, officer, employee or agent, as a designated employee under the District's Conflict of Interest Code, has reported said gifts on his/her annual Statement of Economic Interest as required by said Code. 3. Any firm seeking selection under these procedures that violates the District(s) Conflict of Interest Code shall be automatically disqualified. Section 7: Award of Professional Services Agreements for Major Capital Proiects A. Professional Consulting Services. The award and execution of an agreement for professional consulting services on behalf of the Districts shall be made in accordance with the following delegations of authority: Authorizing Authority Authorized Action 1. Department Heads Solicitation of Requests for Qualifications ("RFQ") and Requests for Proposals (RFP"). 2. General Manager Authorization to evaluate proposals and to execute contracts up to $25,000. 3. OMTS, PDC, or FAHR Receive recommendations of Staff and Committee (or Standing General Manager, and approve Profes- (Committees) sional Services Agreements of over $25,000 up to $50,000. 20W00 swq-i -10- i v18/97 4. Boards of Directors Receive recommendations of Staff, General Manager and Committee, and approve Professional Services Agreements for over $50,000. B. Professional Consulting Services Agreement Addenda. The award and execution of an addendum to an agreement for professional consulting services on behalf of the Districts shall be made in accordance with the following: Authorizing Authority Authorized Action 1. Department Head Authority to negotiate addenda. 2. General Manager Receive recommendation of Staff and approve contract changes up to $25,000 per addendum. The additive value of the changes shall not exceed $50,000. 3. OMTS, PDC, or FAHR Receive recommendations of Staff and Committee (or Standing General Manager and approve contract Committee) changes between $25,000 and $50,000. The additive value of the changes shall not exceed $100,000. 4. Boards of Directors Receive recommendations of Staff, General Manager and Committee and approve contract changes for over $50,000. Section 6: Malor Capital Projects, Approval of Plans and Specifications The procedure and authority for the approval of the design plans and specifications for construction of new or modified District's major capital projects is as follows: A. For any project with approved budget authority, the Director of Engineering is authorized to advertise for construction bids, set a bid date, and receive all bids. B. For any project, if the engineers estimate for the construction contract, as provided by the Director of Engineering or the District's consulting design engineer is equal to or less than the approved construction budget for the project, the Director of Engineering may advertise for bids, and upon receipt, the lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder will be submitted to the Board(s) of Directors for approval. 25S09O 1 -11- 12/18/97 1 C. For any project, if the engineer's estimate for the construction contract, as provided by the Director of Engineering or the District's consulting design engineer, is greater than the approved construction budget for the project, the Director of Engineering shall submit the project to the Standing Committee for recommendation, and based thereon, to the Board(s) of Directors for approval. D. For any project, upon receipt of bids for the construction, if the lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder is equal to or less than the approved construction budget for the project, the bid will be submitted to the Board(s) of Directors. The Board(s) of Directors, upon receipt of the bid, shall approve the plans and specifications of the project and may award a contract. E. For any project, upon receipt of bids for the construction, if the lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder is greater than the approved construction budget for the project, Staff shall present the bid and a recommendation to the Standing Committee for review and recommendation to the Board(s) of Directors. Section 9: Major Capital Projects: Approval of Change Orders to Construction Agreements The procedure and authority for the approval of change orders to construction agreements is as follows: AL General Manager. The General Manager is authorized to approve any single change order with a total amount of additions to the agreement (not the net amount of the change order), not to exceed $50,000, and a total cumulative amount for all change order additions to the agreement not to exceed 5% of the original agreement amount, or $100,000, whichever is lesser. B. Planning Design & Construction Committee. The Planning, Design & Construction Committee is authorized to approve any single change order with a total amount of additions to the agreement (not the net amount of the change order), not to exceed $100,000, and a total cumulative amount for all change order additions to the agreement not to exceed 5% of the original agreement amount of$200,000, whichever is lesser. C. Management and Staff. At such time as the Staff becomes aware of a fact or circumstance that will likely result in total additive change orders exceeding five (5%) percent of the original contract amount, it shall be presented to the Planning, Design & Construction Committee at its next regular meeting for review, consideration and possible action. 3091 s 1 -12- 1211 ere? Section 10: Repeale Districts' Resolutions Nos. 90-43, 94-110 and 95-9 are hereby repealed in their entirety. Section 11: ;Effective Date This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. nn ' PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held lac /7 , 1997. s '1 -13- 12/18/97 Page 1 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil Incorporated C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: February 23, 1998 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. 122-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduet) $29,752.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. P2-35-3 ITEM 1 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REVISION This item is for the material up-grade of the fire alarm panel at the Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. This work consists of upgrading the EST2 fire alarm control panel, which is a stand-alone system to the EST3 fire alarm control panel, which is capable to network with the future fire alarm panels. Staff determined this work is necessary to meet new Districts Standards, which were established after this project was bid and eliminate the need to modify this equipment in the near future. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. Reference: Sverdrup Serial Letter No. 95; Plan Change No. 21. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,171.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - LIGHTING REVISIONS This item is for the labor, equipment and material necessary for the revisions to the lighting system at the Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. This work consists of adding and revising fixture types in the high bay shop areas, kitchen/lunch room and the Soffit area in front of Shop 60. Sixteen lights were changed from 250 watt to 400 watt. This work provides for better illumination and would have been included in the original contract if known or discovered during the design phase. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. Reference: Sverdrup Serial Letter No. 56; Plan Change No. 10. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,162.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Sverdrup Civil Incorporated C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: February 23, 1998 Job: . Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sionage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 ITEM 3 - PANELBOARD REVISION This item is for the labor and material required to up-grade the low voltage switchgear panelboard at the Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. This work consists of changing the QMB isobile panelboard to an I-line circuit breaker panelboard, Model 6-MCC, low voltage switchgear panelboard. Staff determined this work is necessary to meet new Districts Standards and eliminate the need to modify this equipment in the near future. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. Reference: Sverdrup Serial Letter No. 90; Plan Change No. 29. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,867.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4 - FLOOR MATERIAL REVISION This item is for the labor and material required to add resilient floor tile in the second floor shop and offices of the Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Staff requested this work inorder to provide a more functional surface for these areas. The Districts' staffing organization and office utilization has changed since the original building concept. This revision involves approximately 3,350 square feet of new floor covering. The time extension associated with this is due to the timing of the change, which delayed other scheduled work in this area. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. Reference: Sverdrup Serial Letter No.119; Plan Change No. 31B. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,449.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 15 Calendar Days } Page 3 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Sverdrup Civil Incorporated C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: February 23, 1998 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35.3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P246: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 P2-46fP1-385 ITEM 5— PLC PROGRAMING REVISIONS This item is for the labor and material necessary for revisions to PLC Programing at the City Water Pump Stations at Plant No. 1 and No. 2. This work consists of connecting the VFDs directly to the associated PI-Cs via a NOM communication card in each PLC. Also included is the programming of the PI-Cs and VFDs, the configuring of the PI-Cs to the existing Plant Central Computer SCADA system and the preparation of the graphic screens. The Districts Information Technology Staff determined this work was necessary to accommodate future control and automation needs and that it was more cost effective to perform this work at this time. The additional work was not included in the original contract due to the fact that recent automation changes were not known at the design phase of the contract. The time extension associated with this item was determined to be justified due to the amount of additional work and the impact of the projects critical path. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. Reference: Sverdrup Serial Letter No. 117; Plan Change No. 26A. (P246=50%), (P7-38-5=50%) COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,103.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDERS ITEM: 28 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $29,752.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 43 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION.DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Sverdrup Civil Incorporated C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: February 23, 1998 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Sianaae and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-46: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 43 day extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: April 8, 1996 Original Contract Time: 550 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 9, 1997 Time Extension this C.O.: 43 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 82 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 632 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: December 30, 1997 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $13,196,500.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 371,932.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 29,752.00 Amended Contract Price $13,598,184.00 I Page 5 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Sverdrup Civil Incorporated C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: February 23, 1998 Job: Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-5: Process Area Fire Protection. Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P246: and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-55 General Manager Authorization Date: February 23, 1998 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. Contractor Date N erry.=l nglID13S8 OO NTRACTS�2-3 3=5dw �n T PDC COMMITTEE Mee0ng Doh TOJt BQS. 4121% 4lxx(Ba AGENDA REPORT IhmNumN Item Nu her County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineerin Prepared by: Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: CANCEL THE 66 kV SUBSTATION PROJECT AT PLANT NO. 1 (P1-52) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to discontinue working on the 66 kV Substation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-52. SUMMARY Initially, rough cost estimates provided by Southern California Edison (SCE) indicated that the Districts could significantly reduce monthly standby charges by building a 66 kV substation at Plant No. 1. Potential savings the Districts would realize following construction of the proposed substation have been dramatically reduced as a result of deregulation and recent negotiations with SCE. Consequently, it is no longer economically attractive to continue the project. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table and Construction Cost Payback Analysis. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem:CORF 97-98 A.S.C) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In June 1996, changes in the price structure for electrical power indicated that the Districts could significantly reduce monthly electrical charges by building a 66 WV substation for Plant No. 1. In September 1996, rough cost estimates provided by Southern California Edison (SCE) indicated a payback of about seven years. H.Nvp.Wbneww&CON AC 1-StNnk.mr fl,w 1,s„ Page 1 In January 1997, the Directors approved Job No. P1-51, 66kV Substation at Plant 1, for the design and construction support services to provide facilities for receiving electrical power at 66 kV. In September 1997, SCE informed the Districts that monthly standby electrical charges, as a result of deregulation, will be reduced by approximately 40% no later than March 2002. Refined cost estimates provided by the Districts consultant, Holmes and Narver, indicate a revised total project cost of $2,005,000.00 (Attachment B) up from $1,384,000.00 in September 1996. As a result of these changes, an economic cost analysis (Attachment C) prepared by Districts staff shows a revised payback of 17 years. In February 1998, SCE agreed to lower the Districts' standby capacity from the existing 4500 kW to 2500 W. Potential savings in standby costs realized from building a 66 kV substation have therefore been further reduced. There now appears to be no reasonable economic motive for proceeding with this project. Since the increased reliability at 66 kV is small, staff recommends discontinuing this project at this time. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Revised Total Project Cost 3. Construction Cost Payback Analysis n1. aue.y�aCo .CTs 1..m-m R� 1� Page 2 (Attachment A) BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE 66 W SUBSTATION JOB NO. Pl-52 THIS REQUEST ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTRASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED BUDGET TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE INCREASE AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Reimbursment of SCE Costs E 410,000 f 410,000 f S f 410,000 f - f - f - E 0% Construct Districts portion of station f 700,DDO E 700,000 f $ E 700000 E - E - E - E 0% Consultant support services E 150.000 f 151 f - $ E 150,000 E - E - f - E 13,000 9% Staff Project Management f 124,000 f 124,000 E E f 124.OD0 f - f - f - f 2SDD0 21% TOTAL f 1,384,ODO f 1,384,000 f - E - f 1,384,000 f - f - IS - f 39,000 1 3% H%w rr,&ngyo wttactaws2SLWS1rSL W6 es Attachment B Estimated Total Project Cost Breakdown 66 kV Substation Cost Items Capital Cost SCE One Time Collectable Substation/Substation Transition $606,000.00 $75,000.00 Area Requirements Subtransmission $56,000.00 $12,000.00 Distribution 50.00 $17,000.00 Telecommunications $23,000.00 $4,000.00 Real Properties $5,000.00 131-D Process $50,000.00 ITCC $241.000.00 Substation Cost $590,000.00 Additional Cost $32,000.00 Subtotal of Capital Costs $1,623,000 $108,000.00 Cost Items Cost Capital Costs s 1,623,000.00 SCE One Time Collectable $ 108,000.00 Consultant Design $150,000.00 Staff Project Management and Coordination $124,000.00 Total Project Cost $2,005,000.00 II„ry,.daW gVOIIt R CON'I KACJSV1-MVl7ACR.bbw Fe Cmutr VFAR1 TFAR IS YFARm YFMII YEMP TEMP TEM21 TNN REVENUFsa snlnNGs Stn@ry LMge SmNpa f 0.91 f 321.51 Si $ tins f In" f Imm i in" $ In" 1 1BT.P fs.l TOTAL REVEYM f wim t f inn f 1n10 S m-n S inn t Im" f I" $6.1mm $TA11QY UMNSE36 WM Membnaaa Cmu i T.m ft i T.m t T.IU TO S T.m S T. i T.m i T.TO s I'm �NmEy' 31S2 31M 31m 31m 31m 3132 31m 10TAL WB115E3 f W22 s s 3B]2 s IDYl s 3832 s 3s]2 s %}t f 3p32 i BIBS ANNUPL NET SANNGS f ffi.p0 S S tA38 f 1S33f S 1SS58 f INN 153m t f31S0 f1.1W.13 CUN NET BONING$ - f 2B2AB S 3&01L1 SSSei20 53.m7a S3,SB2S1 SI.W5h 34.10.42 COMWCI]OWOR rW&11ONGS F."Caab f 2L65L0 CmMYpon Fmn ONen IDRInn.Ek) NETCSDC0Il31RUClIIXIC $2DW.00 BORROKING 45% f W.W 50.00 SOLp SOLO mils! 70ID 50.00 S PRESE�ySJS AAtump oNcwnl Ree e% Prgamvelw Pf Annutl CnnFW s% f a05. s MAI s omen!vNue elAc[um Cpn FYw B% fa iP8.11 s 50.]s s am f 117 s I81 1 OM f 37m $V72.0 Als&m 32206.p1 ft]51.is S2.m003S f2,3305p =3=7 2 C_50 ConanucNOP pe4lMcl IO py TbINn paNNe P tlWCY pnpNeL p We! Fa Cct pabnrx COSTBEN"LS Y269B MEW Q Coat Pry8803 Ae3Meb 'CANT 1 -JOB NO.P142 times 1000 10 YEM11 Y 12 Y 13 Y 14 1 nAIIS I Y 13 1 15 1 WMI Y " YE 21 YEPA22 YEM2] 24 Ta 2.R 3 IM78 $ 182]8 $ 1W)8 3 1N.78 S 1W." S 1W." 3 Inn 3 In" S Inn $ 1W.M S INTO S 1W.79 f IW.]S 8 132)e fS.IbW L78 3 1W.)e S 1Qn f IW.TB S 1W.)B S 1W]8 3 Inn f Inn S 1W.70 f 1W." S Inn S IN., S In, S In, f 1W]e SS,ta08D LW S T.W S In S T.W 3 T.W S ).W t In S T.TO $ ].]0 S ).W $ T.W $ S.TO S T.TO S T.TO S LID S Ias.w 1A2 31.52 31.32 SIN 31.52 31M 31M 31M 3Iv 31M 3IN 31M 3IM mR 31.52 I.M S um S um 3 uz S um S WYJ S "M S Wn $ W12 $ 39]3 S "'n $ "M S um 3 W= $ W22 3 .1. 'M f ISIM S IMM S IMM f Iva.Y S IMM $ IMM f 15a.Y S INN 3 IMM f 1MM 3 13. M S IWAS 3 IMM f 153.53 fttBBAx I.M f2.2MM f2.338.)5 52310]1 $2.8 W $2,017,42 f2470M $3,124,0 332M.M fa.ltb 83.5 " f3.Mn $3B1.31 I$4A5.8) S4.IW42 M W.W W.W W.W I MM. W.W MM W.W WAD MW W.W MIX W.W W.W. W.W 8 �)t S W.W f ]831 f )tee S 8).W I S 8407 $ W..S f A.W S 53.W S MIS f 47M S 45.17 $ 4261 S t030 S 37.93 $2,3nM .52 SI.8584I sl.Tu)x s1.Odn s1.313.01 si.8tB.2I uA8]te u.4M.I8 u.I01W u.159.n u19.91 ss351]8 sx1W.aB 52.33130 u.a)z.0 ftWv k P.Igps�lc PeWMµ .P tlm.h P.Wms2 F Mm[Y a.iamnt ynamc. Nfi90 wTTALN E ro c "CAR W KV SUBSTATION AT w1lam are tlm Fe Wnm MAI YEAR2 YEAR] I YW4 MitsE$ N22 YEAPT YEAPB YEARS YEA REVENUEBM a N(W SWtBy Lkuee SaNnpe S OS1 $ 32130 S 321W S MIM S Ulm 8 IN.M $ 182.T8 i IM.28 $ 192.78 8 11 TOTAL PNVNNDSS S 33130 S 32130 8 321.M S A1]0 S Ion i 182.]8 8 192M S 132T8 S N STATION E%pEry8E8t CO3T5 Melnlmmo WNs i T.M $ Im $ T.M $ T.M 8 T.M 8 T.M $ T.M $ T.M S OMerf\y: 31m 31M 31M 31M 31M 31.0 31M 31.52 TOTAL NINNIES S TEM S No $ A.23 $ SU23 3 3033 S ia.22 3 MM S 3a22 S ANNUAL NET SAVINGS S MIS S 2W.W 3 282.W S 282.0 S IMM S 1A.A $ INN $ 1A.A S 11 ACCUMNUMWNGS $ 38MW S 581.15 S M.M S1,1M38 S1281S8 31.♦SSA2 31,588.8T 31.]♦].A S1AB8G8 S2.0 CGITPIICTION GP AL W ISITAN C0828 FWVRY esM 3 2A0 M LuB WWSFm OMM(GMW.Etc) NUMC(MnM llDNCOST 52005Sa PROCEEDS FROM 60RRMNO ♦.5% S SMW ww mm No W.M. M.W MW Wm MAD I PRESEM VAIyj 1 51 AfeumeE WmunI RWe B% Pmenl VeWe WAnnutl Cua Fbw a% 3 AaS. S Za&11 S 251.(LM1 i 3Y.81 $ 22].0 8 11♦.T5 8 1" S IM12 i 8831 8 M.89 $ f Pmenl VeWsalAaunCM Flaw 8% 33 .00 fMB11 AIT.18 ETA.88 22.12 31.OW.1) i12W.13 f130251 51388.80 31A2.78 310 0QCRnsWcWn NWMck In W W1Wm COUGENSALS PDC COMMITTEE " nso'� TGmea,. a/z/se a/else AGENDA REPORT Item Number aem NU Peeve-t1 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineerin Originator: Murthy, Umesh SUBJECT: INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED FUNDS FOR OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES, PROJECT NO. J-34-1 AND PHASE 2 SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT 2, PROJECT NO. P2-35-5 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve an increase in authorized funds of$1,104,106.00 for Project No. J-34-1, bringing the project total to $8,259,106.00 to cover all previous and anticipated costs required to complete construction. 2. Approve an increase in authorized funds of$ 229,632.00 for Project No. P2-35-5, bringing the project total to $1,455,632.00 to cover all previous and anticipated costs required to complete construction. SUMMARY The subject projects, J-34-1 and P2-35-5 were combined into one construction contract and awarded to Advanco Constructors during January 1997. The 1997/98 CORF Budget does not include sufficient funds to finish construction for the subject projects for the following reasons: 1. Fiscal Year 1995-96 costs of$896,146.00 were inadvertently not included in the project budget during the Fiscal Year 1997-98 budgeting process. 2. To cover costs due to the increase in overhead factor from 0.6 to 1.5 in accordance with our current overhead accounting practice. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table, J-34-1 and P-35-5 Budget Worksheel BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:C.2.a and BAC) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) For the J-34-1 project, the proposed action will increase the total amount of authorized funds by $1,1 D4,106.00, a 15% increase. Since sufficient funds are not available for the completion of this project, the proposed increase in funds will be charged to the Districts reserves. G'^l,�Ugmdr do npombe:yadl P2] 5Budgm nd do Page 1 For the P2-35-5 project the proposed action will increase the total amount of authorized funds by $229,632, a 19% increase. Since sufficient funds are not available for the completion of this project, the proposed increase in funds will be charged to the Districts reserves. The budget increase in the subject projects will be shown in the proposed 1998-99 Budget Manual. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Project No. J-34-1, Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades The project consists of improving the reliability of the standby Ocean Outfall Pipeline by constructing a new Surge Tower in this line and adding valves to the existing system. The plans and specifications were prepared by Carollo Engineers. The construction contract was awarded to Advanco Constructors in November 1996. The contract is approximately 94% complete. Additional budget to complete the project is required for the following reasons: 1. The original Job Plan for the project proposed a total budget of$13,100,000. However, the approved 1997-98 budget for the project was $7,155,000 because during the 1997-98 budget approval process staff inadvertently did not include the fiscal year 1995-96 expenses. These expenses included design staff and design consultant costs prior to construction. There total $896,146.00; which needs to be included in the budget. 2. An additional amount of$207,960.00 is required to cover the overhead cost which have increased as a result of revising the overhead factor of 0.6 to 1.5. Following is the summary of the budget: 1997-98 Budget $7,155,000.00 Budget Amendments Since July 1997 $ 0.00 This Proposed Change $1,104,106.00 Project No. 132-35-5, Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant 2 The project consists of miscellaneous site and landscape improvements at Plant No. 2. The plans and specifications were prepared by Brown and Caldwell Engineers. The construction contract was awarded to Advanco Constructors in November 1996. The contract is approximately 70% complete. Additional budget to complete the project is required for the following reasons: G MGbWllavnG ann .wa`e�4xi.c2ds5 BuOpeumend voc Page 2 1. Similar to Project No. J-34-1, the 1997-98 budget for P2-35-5 did not include the o fiscal year 1995-96 expenses incurred during the planning and design phase of the project. These costs include design staff and design consultant costs prior to construction. This equates an amount of$205,933.00 which is to be included in the budget. 2. An additional amount of $23,699.D0 is required to cover the overhead cost that has increased as a result of revising the overhead from a factor of 0.6 to 1.5. Following is the summary of the budget: 1997-98 Budget $1,226,000.00 Budget Amendments Since July 1997 $ 0.00 This Proposed Change $ 229,632.00 ALTERNATIVES No cost effective alternatives. CEQA FINDINGS (Final EIR approved on July 1989 and notice of determination fled on 2/9/95) ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. J-34-1 Budget Worksheet 3. P2-35-5 Budget Worksheet G.indbulu9ndz ann repwb`edcY l+ Hass ewI..dz Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site and Security Improvements JOB NO. J-34.1 and P2.36.5 THIS REQUEST ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED BUDGET TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE INCREASE AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Consultant E 226.740 $ 226,740 $ - $ 226,740 $ 226.740 $ - $ - $ 226,740 $ 145,944 64% Stag $ 675.377 S 675.377 S 231.659 $ 907.036 $ 675,377 6 231.659 $ 231.659 $ 907,036 $ 527,968 78% ContraccWr $ 7,478,B83 E 7.478,883 $ 1,102.079 $ 8,580,962 $ 7,285,233 $ 1,102,079 $ - $ 7,285,233 E 6,257,918 84% TOTAL $ 8,3B1,DD0 $ 8.381.000 S 1.333,738 $ 9.714.738 1 $ 8.187.350 $ 1.333.738 S 231, 559 $ 8,419,009 $ 6,931,830 83% H1. dtnl ngMngVormswlTbudamendl J-34-1, Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades Budget Worksheet Date:1-29-98 Proposed 1996-97 1997-98 Total Costs Remaining Overhead Cost to Cost Type Cost Type Budget Costs Costs as of 1.2748 Budget %Expended Factor Complete 14210 Staff Labor $ 231.Tl $ 62,771 $ 86,535 $ 149,306 $ 82,465 64,42% $ 52,293 14220 Staff Labor OT $ - S - S 2,888 $ 2.888 $ (2,888) $ 14290 Employee Benefits $ 69,531 $ 18,831 $ 13.688 $ 32.519 $ 37.012 46.77% $ 20,000 1060 Materials $ 7.532 $ 482 $ 145 $ 627 $ 6,905 8.32% $ 6.905 14411 Study Contract $ - $ - $ - $ - S - 14412 Design Contract $ 226,740 $ 106,117 $ 39,827 $ 145,944 $ 80.796 64.37% $ 70.796 14413 Construction Cont. $ 6.355,326 $ 1,474,855 $ 4.093,158 $ 5,568,013 $ 787,313 87.61% $ 787,313 1"14 Site Study Contract $ - $ - $ - S - $ - 14415 Soils COMract $ 6,327 $ 1,327 $ 9,371 $ 10,698 $ (4,371) 169.08% $ 1"16 Survey Contract $ 8.094 $ 3,094 $ - $ 3,094 $ 5,000 38,23% $ 14417 Testing Contract $ 6.650 $ - $ 7,877 $ 7.877 $ (1,227) 118.45% $ 14418 Specialty Contract $ 52.247 $ 16.450 $ - $ 16,45D $ 35.797 31.49% $ 25.797 14450 Temp.Staff Labor $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 14480 Legal Fees S - $ - $ 132 $ 132 $ (132) 14510 Permit Fees $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 14560 Travel $ - $ - $ 587 $ 587 $ (587) $ 14600 Vehicle Usage $ 10.000 $ 19 $ - $ 19 $ 9,981 0.19% $ 14800 Overhead $ 180.781 $ 128.311 $ 125.430 $ 253.741 $ (72,960) 140.36% 1.50 $ 207.960 Total $ 7,154,999 $ 1.812,257 $ 4.379.638 $ 7,088,041 $ 66,9W 99.06% $ 1.171,064 EsOmated amount required for completion $ 1,104,106 1995-96 Costs $896,146 e§vpAY�mpenp'}341Ua0.1dW0eMMeewn]IS% 132-35-5, Phase II Site and Security Improvements Budget Worksheet Date:1-29-98 proposed 1996-97 1997-98 Total Coate Remaining % Overhead Coat to Cost Typo Cost Type Budget Casts Coats as of 147-96 Budget Expended Factor Complete 14210 Staff Labor $ 31,850 $ 4,850 $ 8,670 It 13,520 $ 18,330 42.45% $ 10.000 14220 Staff Labor OT $ - $ - $ 257 $ 257 $ (257) 0.001A $ 14290 Employee Benefits $ 9.555 $ 1,455 $ 1,199 $ 2,654 $ 6,901 27.78% $ 5,000 14360 Materials $ 911 $ - $ - $ - $ 911 0.00% $ 14411 Study Contract $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00% 14412 Design Contract S - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00% $ 14413 Construction Contract $ 1.123,557 $ W6,729 $123.176 $ 689,905 $ 433,652 61.40% $ 433,652 14414 Site Study Contract $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00% 14415 Soils Contract S 6,597 $ 1.597 $ - $ 1.597 $ 5.000 24.21% $ 5.000 14416 Survey Contract $ 2,618 $ 1.518 $ - $ 1,518 S 1.000 60.29% S 1.000 14417 Testing Contract It 6,569 $ 1,569 $ - It 1,569 $ 5,000 23.88% $ 5.000 14418 Specialty Contract $ 19,600 $ 2.873 $ - $ 2,873 $ 16.727 14.66% $ 16,727 14460 Temp.Staff Labor $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00% 14480 Legal Fees $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00% 14510 permit Fees $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00% 14550 Travel $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00% $ - 14600 Vehicle Usage $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00% S - 14800 Overhead $ 24.843 $ 9,803 $ 16,239 $ 26,042 $ (1,199) 104.83% 1.50 $ 23,699 Total $ 1.226,000 S 590,394 $149,541 $ 955,654 S 270,446 77,94% $ 500,078 Estimated amount required for completion $ 229,632 1996-96 Costs $215.619 H:lwpdtalenglengU-34-lU-34-1BudgetWorkshetl22597 PDC COMMITTEE WdffigDete TOMM. 4/2/98 4/22/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Numbe I Item u be 5 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineeri Prepared by: Charles Pasinli SUBJECT: Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer, Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1.) Ratify Change Order No. 3 and Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. 3-35R-1 with Mike Prlich & Sons for Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue in the net amount of$ 245,736.00, 2.) approve an increase to the budget in the amount of$ 258,479.00 and 3.) accept Contract 3-35R-1 as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approve final closeout agreement with Mike Prlich & Sons. SUMMARY Change Order No. 3 includes nine items of added work to Contract No. 3-35R-1. There are no Errors or Omissions items associated with this Change Order. There is a 67 day time extension associated with this Change Order, which is not subject to liquidated damages. Change Order No. 4 is for an adjustment of unit quantities for the contract. Liquidated damages on this contract are $750.00 a day and there are no bonus provisions. The budget increase is required to provide for construction change orders, construction staff support and for overhead costs. The original approved budget allocated insufficient funds to complete the project. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Contract No. 3-35R-1, Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer, Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue, provides for the construction of a new 48-inch reinforced concrete sewer pipe between Westminster and Trask Avenue on Magnolia Street in the City of Garden Grove. DGA Consultants performed the design for this $1.8 million project and the construction contract was awarded to Mike Prlich & Sons in March 1997. Change Order No. 3 is an addition of$ 318,486.00 to the contract for nine items of additional work, and a time extension of 67 calendar days. Change Order No. 4 is the adjustment of engineering quantities for a credit in the amount of $ 72,750.00. The contract work is complete. The following is a summary of the contract. Original Contract Price $ 1,808,440 Previous Authorized Changes $ 51,303 Change Order No. 3(Add)(DeduGt) $ 318.486 Percent Increase 20.45% Amended Contract Price $ 2,178,229 Previous Authorized Changes $ 369,789 Change Order No. 4(Add)(Deduct) $ (72,750 Percent Increase 16.43% Amended Contract Price $ 2,105,479 The following summarizes the Change Order Nos. 3 and 4: ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE Change Order No. 3 1 Design New Traffic Plans $12.232 28 Changed Conditions 2 Temporary Traffic Contml $13,738 9 Changed Conditions 3 Implement New Traffic Contml Plans $55,310 19 Changed Conditions 4 Manhole Revisions $12,898 3 Changed Conditions 5 Complete Garden Grove Contract $38,195 3 Work Not Related 6 Undisclosed Concrete Paving $16,876 5 Changed Conditions 7 Extended Overhead Costs $ 106,200 0 Other 8 Pipe Inspection $ 63.559 0 Work Not Related 9 Core Drill Manhole $ 478 0 Changed Conditions TOTAL-Change Order No.3 $318,486 67 Change Order No.4 1 Adjustment of Quantities $ (72,750)1her TOTAL-Change Order No.4 $ (72,760)1 0 Item No. 7 is extended overhead associated with Item Nos. 1-6. All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the design phase. c�,eiomiwo..m o,.n A.00mwocuiR.coas�m.+mo ant ,ter Page 2 BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. (Line item: District 3) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The approved budget for the project is $2,300,000. Additional funds in the amount of $258,479.00 are needed to fund completion of the project. The funds requested are for staff labor, staff overhead, and change orders required to complete the project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BACKGROUND FOR ITEMS 1, 2, 5, AND 6 ON CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 Item 1, in the amount of$ 12,232.00 and a time extension of 28 calendar days, is for providing new traffic control plans for the contract work. The City of Garden Grove stopped the Contractor after the contract Notice to Proceed. The City already had an ongoing street improvement project blocking Trask Avenue and requested a new traffic control plan. The Contractor was required to produce a new plan. The City imposed a new restriction stating that the Trask Avenue and Westminster Avenue intersections on Magnolia Avenue could not be blocked to traffic at the same time. Consequently, the City would not allow the Districts to block one of the intersections if the city contractor blocked the other intersection. New plans were designed to resolve the situation. Items 2 and 3 were for additional field costs to implement the new plans. Item 5, in the amount of$38,195.00 and a time extension of 3 calendar days, is for additional work due to a scheduling conflict with a City of Garden Grove contractor performing street improvements at the intersection of Magnolia and Trask Avenues. The city's contractor was scheduled to complete the work in December of 1996. The Notice to Proceed for this contract was issued on January 6, 1997. However, the city's contractor failed to complete the work on schedule and a contract dispute had developed between the city and it's contractor. District's Contractor could not complete the contract work in the intersection until the City contractor moved out of the intersection. The Districts and the City reached an agreement for the Districts Contractor to complete the city's work. The agreement allowed the Districts project to continue thereby minimizing delays. The City will reimburse the Districts an amount of $ 36,000.00 representing the direct costs to complete the City's work. Item 7, in the amount of$ 106,200.00, is for Contractor standby equipment and overhead delay costs associated with the time extensions on the contract. c oywan W.naa onn nepaawmnw.coz>ssr+aec R..:.e. 1w 1 Page 3 Item 8, in the amount of$ 63,559.00, is for providing labor and equipment to excavate r and remove two sections of an existing 42-inch reinforced concrete pipe for an inspection. Approximately five thousand feet of this existing pipe was scheduled for rehabilitation on the future Magnolia Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Project. This inspection was to confine the structural integrity of the pipe and the condition of the interior lining of pipe. The pipe and pipe lining was found to be in good condition and pipeline rehabilitation would not be necessary. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 3 4. Change Order No. 4 TH:Idc G,nIBbbMBeMa pn�RggrpWCCVJRLp1335r.1 Mc R. 1 r 7 Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Magnolia Trunk Relief Sewer, Westminster to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 THIS REQUEST ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT(TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED BUDGET TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE INCREASE AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) CONSULTANT $ 58,035 $ 58.035 S - $ 58,035 $ 58.035 $ - $ - $ 58,035 $ 32,000 55% STAFF $ 342,965 $ 342.965 $ 52,000 $ 394,965 $ 342,965 $ 52.000 $ 52,000 $ 394.965 $ 284,802 83% CONTRACTOR $ 1,149,DDD $ 1,899.000 $ 206.479 $ 2.105,479 $ 1.859.743 $ 206.479 $ 245,736 $ 2.105,479 $ 1,647,437 87% TOTAL $ 1,550.000 1 $ 2,3D0,000 $ 258,479 $ 2.558,479 $ 2.260.743 $ 258,479 $ 297,736 $ 2,558,479 $ 1,964,239 85% H Nryftbglpb3 V U35t1gw4gM W3 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer, Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract 3-35R-1 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACTCOST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 10/24/96 $ 1,808,440,00 $ 1,808,440.00 200 200 CO NO. 1 1/5/98' $ 23,989.00 $ 1,832,429.00 1,33 2 202 CO NO. 2 3116/98' $ 27,314.00 $ 1,859,743.00 2S4 0 202 CO NO. 3 4/22/98 $ 318,486.00 $ 2,178,229.00 20A5 67 269 CO NO, 4 1 4/22/98 $ (72,750o0) $ 2,105,479.00 16A3 0 269 'Approved by General Manager per delegated Authority Board Resolution 97-37 K\wp.dta\ ng\ong\3-35R-1\costatus —a - y Page 1 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: Aoril22, 1998 Job: Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer.Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Dedust) $318,486.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — DESIGN NEW TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS This item for preparing a new traffic control plan for the work between Westminster and Mays on Magnolia and also between Mays Avenue and the Garden Grove Freeway. The traffic control plans included in the contract documents were not accepted by the City of Garden Grove. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,232.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 28 Calendar Days ITEM 2— EXTEND TRAFFIC CONTROL BEYOND MAYS\MAGNOLIA INTERSECTION This item is for providing temporary traffic control measures at the Mays\Magnolia Avenue intersection to allow construction to proceed while new traffic plans were developed and approved. Construction had to proceed another one hundred feet to open access into an adjacent residential subdivision. This work was done in response to citizen complaints and also requests from the City of Garden Grove Publics Works Department. The work includes daily placement and removal of delineators and also relocation of construction shoring materials restricting residential access. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,738.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 9 Calendar Days Page 2 of 7 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Dale: April 22, 1998 Job: Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 ITEM 3— IMPLEMENT NEW TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS This item is for the following additional work required to implement new traffic control plans approved by the City of Garden Grove: a.) Additional materials not included in the original traffic control plan. b.) Additional temporary traffic striping not included in the original traffic control plan. c.) Replacement of curb and stamped concrete median between Westminster and Trask Avenue. d.) Temporary intersection traffic signals at the Garden Grove Freeway Ramp. e.) Traffic striping at Trask and Mays intersections. f.) Temporary striping removal and restripping between the Garden Grove Freeway and Trask Avenue. This work was not shown in the contract documents but was required to complete the project. This work was accomplished by Contractors farce account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 55,310.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 19 Calendar Days ITEM 4- BYPASS AND NEW MANHOLE AT TRASKIMAGNOLIA INTERSECTION This item is for the following items of additional work: a.) Removal and disposal of portion of existing 42-inch sewer for connection to manhole and repair of sewer and manhole liner. b.) Reshape manhole channel. c.) Demolish and remove from site an existing manhole. d.) Completion of new drop manhole. a.) Excavation and shoring required for above work. This work was not shown in the contract documents but was required to complete the project. This work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,898.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days Page 3 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: April 22. 1998 Job: Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer.Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 ITEM 5-COMPLETE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT This item is for the following work completed at the Trask Avenue and Magnolia Avenue intersection: a.) Grind asphalt and pave along curb and gutter. b.) Replace manhole frames and covers. c.) Replace water valves. d.) Demolish asphalt paving for placement of concrete curb. e.) Place asphalt paving. f.) Replace traffic detector loops. g.) Remove and dispose of broken concrete, asphalt and dirt. This work was being performed by a City of Garden Grove street improvement project that was being held up by a dispute between the city and it's contractor. Districts work could not proceed until the city contractor moved out of the intersection. Districts agreed to complete the work to minimize delays. This work was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $38,195.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days ITEM 6- UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE PAVING This item is for the labor, materials, and equipment to demolish and remove from the site additional existing concrete pavement. Contractor encountered existing paving an average of fifteen inches thick between Station 264 to Station 279 and also between Station 280 to Station 290. The contract documents indicated a pavement thickness of six-inches. This work was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. - ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $15,876.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days Page 4 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: April 22. 1998 Job: Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer.Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 ITEM 7— EXTENDED OVERHEAD COSTS This item is to compensate the Contractor for indirect costs associated with the contract delays which were caused by the added work included in Items 1, 2, 3, and 4. The indirect costs include: a.) Standby equipment costs b.) Field overhead costs c.) Home office overhead This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $106.200.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8—PIPE INSPECTION This item is for additional labor, equipment, and materials to expose an existing sewer for a Districts inspection. The scope of the additional work includes: a.) Traffic control b.) Excavation of inspection pit to expose two lengths of existing sewer. c.) Shoring and solid sheeting of excavation. d.) Dewatering of the excavation during inspection e.) Loading and transporting pipe to inspection facility f.) Backfill of excavation g.) Pavement and site repairs The inspection verified that the existing sewer was in good condition and will not have to be siiplined in a future contract. This work was accomplished by force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $63.559.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 5 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10944 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: April 22, 1998 Job: Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer.Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 ITEM 9 - CORE DRILL MANHOLE This item is to core drill an existing manhole to provide the design elevation for connection of a proposed drop manhole. The plans showed connecting to an existing lateral that was not at the elevation shown on the drawings. This work was accomplished by force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $478.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $318.486.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 67 Calendar Days D Page 6 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich 8 Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: April 22, 1998 Job: Maonolia Relief Trunk Sewer Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 67 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 6, 1997 Original Contract Time: 200 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: July 24, 1997 Time Extension this C.O.: 67 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 69 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 269 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 1, 1997 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: WA Actual Final Completion Date: October 1, 1997 Original Contract Price $ 1,808,440.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 51,303.00 This Change (Add) (Beduel) $ 318,486.00 Amended Contract Price $2.178.229.00 Page 7 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER - Contractor: Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: April 2. 1998 Job: Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer.Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 Board Approval Date: April 22, 1998 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Rem ended by: ,l p_ _ a- Co truction Ma ager Prov Y Director of Engineering Date Accepted by: MIKE PRLICH &SONS C" gractor Dat H:1W P.DTAIENQENG1-35R11C0.3 I - Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich 8 Sons C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: April 22, 1998 Job: Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer.Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Deduct) ($72.750.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCT: Item No. Unit Description From To Difference U.P. Total 3. LS Confined Space 31,000 24,000 7,000 $31,000.00 $ (7,000.00) 11. VF 84" Manhole 54 17 37 850.00 (31,450.00) 25. SF Bus Pad 1050 530 520 8.00 (4,160.00) 27. CY Crushed Rock 500 450 50 22.00 (1,100.00) (12"to 24') 28. SY Slurry Seal Coat 10,000 480 9,520 2.00 (19,040.00) 31. CY Aggregate Base 2.000 1.000 1,000 10.00 (10,000.00) TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: ($72,750.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: April 22, 1998 Job: Magnolia Relief Trunk Sewer.Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-35R-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 6, 1997 Original Contract Time: 200 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: July 24, 1997 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 69 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 269 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 1, 1997 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: WA Actual Final Completion Date: October 1, 1997 Original Contract Price $ 1,808,440.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 369,789.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (72,750.00) Amended Contract Price $ 2.105A79.00 Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich & Sons C.O. No.: Four(4) Date: April 22, 1998 Job: Magnolia Relief Trunk Sevver.Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue Contract No. 3-3511-1 Board Approval Date: April 22, 1998 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reco ended by: D. -a- a Co traction Manager A rov d Director of Engi eenng Dale Accepted by: MIKE PRLICH & SONS .� / A ontractor Date H:\wp.dla\engUOSS 8 CONTRACTS\3.35R1\C0.4.doc q County Sanitation Districts ,ul- of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday. April 8. 1998, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, April S. 1998, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Offices. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: George Brown, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John J. Collins, Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay Gary Streed, Director of Finance Barry Denes Chris Dahl, Director of Information Technology Norman Z. Eckenrode Mike Petemtan, Director of Human Resources John M. Gullixson Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Mark Leyes Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst Mark A. Murphy Mike White, Controller Thomas R. Saltarelli Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Committee Directors Absent : Doug Cook, Chief Operator Jon Thomsic, Senior Engineer Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Ryal Wheeler, Foreman William G. Steiner Bill Webster, Senior Operations officer John Swindler, Information Technology Supervisor Other Directors Present: Gerald Jones, Maintenance Manager Lisa Lorey, Human Resources Manager None Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary Others Present: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers Stephen Sheldon, Sheldon &Associates Adam Probolsky, Adam D. Probolsky&Associates APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee ° Page 2 4 April 8, 1998 �V APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the March 11, 1998, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE • Gary Streed, Director of Finance, advised that the Treasurers Report was distributed prior to the meeting in accordance with the Districts' policy. • A letter from the City of Garden Grove was also distributed prior to the meeting dealing with user fees and the RAC process, for the Committee's information. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources advised that there would be a dosed session regarding labor relations with the Supervisory and Professional employees. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS • Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman stated that the Groundwater Replenishment System luncheon will be held at the Districts on Thursday, April 301h. It is being held at the Districts because we can accommodate more people in our Board Room than the Water District can. • Last year Elected Officials' Day was held in May. We have been unable to find a day in May which would accommodate everyone's schedule, therefore, it has been postponed until later in the year. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee f Page 3 V April 8, 1998 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS M -31 1. FAHR98-25: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 1998, AND FORWARD TO THE JOINT BOARDS: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. 2. FAHR98-26: Receive and file Certificates Of Participation (COP) Report 3. FAHR98-27: Receive and file Employment Status Report END OF CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 1 through 3 under Consent Calendar. The Chair requested that staff present Item No. 10 on the Supplemental Agenda out of order. OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY 10. FAHR98-32: Sewer Service User Fee Ordinance General Manager Don McIntyre introduced Stephen Sheldon and Adam Probolsky, counsel retained by the Revenue Enhancement Group, to speak on their behalf. Revenue Enhancement's major concern is the time frame their clients can receive restitution for fees they feel they have been overcharged. Mr. Sheldon expressed his appreciation to Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Streed and Mr. Woodruff for the time they have spent meeting with him and conversing with him on the phone. Mr. Sheldon gave the Committee an overview of the situation which he said was comprised of"90% public policy and 10% law." In conclusion, he advised that his client would like the Districts to reinstate the 4 year limitation for both rebates and refunds, and have no distinction between the two. He suggested the Districts increase the number of use categories so the problem does not occur as often. Mr. Sheldon requested that this item be brought to the full Board for their consideration. Upon discussion and questioning of the two legal representatives, the Committee members fell potential litigation was involved and discussion should take place in closed session. The Committee unanimously agreed to go into Closed Session on this item. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 The Committee convened in closed session at 6:00 p.m., as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9, to discuss and consider item 10 on the published Supplemental Agenda. At 6:17 p.m. the Committee reconvened in Regular Session. It was moved, seconded and duly caned to direct staff to bring additional reports regarding this issue back to the FAHR Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 April 8, 1998 The following items were presented out of Agenda order, however, they are reported in order for continuity purposes. ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 4 -6) 4. FAHR98-28: Adopt Resolution No. 98-XX which: (1) Repeals the Deferred Compensation Program in its entirely. (2) Approves of salary range increases in the amounts necessary for the General Manager to provide salary increases to those individuals in an amount exactly equal to the amounts previously paid by the Districts to those individuals through the Deferred Compensation Program. (3) Ensures that any former employees who terminated employment prior to the vesting of the deferred contribution, with the resulting forfeiture of those sums back to the Districts, would not be entitled to now receive those sums. Director John Collins (JC) requested that his abstention from discussion and voting on this matter be made a matter of record, as well as his absence from the conference room during the Committee's consideration of this item. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carded to recommend that the Joint Boards adopt Resolution No. 98-XX. 5. FAHR98-29: Receive and file Sewer Service User Fee Status Report MOTION: Received and fled. 6. FAHR98-30: Receive and file Reserves Policy Status Report MOTION: Received and filed. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, advised that items 7 and 8 are related informational items. Item No. 7 is a presentation about Information Technology and Plant Automation, and how we are applying data information and integrating systems to make it all useful to staff. He advised that Item 8 was presented to the Planning, Design and Construction Committee (PDC) last week (April 2)with the intent to award the J-42 Professional Service Agreement (PSA) to begin the work. A protest from the unsuccessful consultant, Westin Engineering, was received (a copy of the protest letter was handed out to the Committee prior to the meeting). As a result, the PDC Committee went into dosed session to discuss the protest and what should be done. The Committee's decision was to direct staff to reissue the RFP to the four consultants previously found qualified. Those consultants are: Westin Engineering, Parsons Engineering Sciences, Montgomery Watson and Malcom Pimie. Staff had recommended that the PSA be awarded to Parsons Engineering. Staff will be doing rework on the RFP and expects up to a three-month delay before the PSA is brought back to the PDC Committee and Board for final approval. 7 Minutes of Finance. Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 April 8, 1998 7. FAHR98-31: Office and Plant Computerization Overview Chris Dahl, Director of Information Technology, provided the Committee with a gold colored handout prior to the meeting which contained information on Information Technology projects and a list of acronyms and their definitions. He presented an overview of the current state of the use of information technology in the Districts' office and plant environments. He reviewed some of the reasons why the Districts is interested in information technology, what the Districts' approach is to new technology, and the"frontier" projects. Bill Webster, Senior Operations Supervisor and Grade V Operator, gave a brief overview of the recent past, current status, and near term future of the Districts' automation and control systems. His presentation contained an overview of the Districts' CRISP system, a Plant 2 historical overview of remote process control systems, and a brief description of the J-42 project and where we are headed. 8. PDC98-11: Informational Presentation re J-42 Reinvention and Automation Project Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager, advised that the J42 project is a collaborative effort with Engineering as the leader with input from O&M and Plant Automation. He discussed automation of the treatment plants and the productivity gains expected. He summarized the J-42 project, the four phases required to implement the project over the next five years, benefits of the project, the project's time table of scheduled activities, projected staffing levels as a result of automation of the plants, and the projects budget information. General Manager Don McIntyre advised that this report would not normally go to the FAHR Committee, since it is a PDC Committee item. However, since it is a very important project with a large dollar amount estimated to cost about$25 million overall, it is being presented to the standing committees. The project is fundamental to what the Districts is trying to do relating to reengineering the Plants, and is the key to how we expect to reduce staffing levels. 9. CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item specified under"Closed Session"as Item 9(a) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 7:35 p.m. At 7:45 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 549057.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Meetings. No action was take re Agenda Item 9(a). MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 April 8, 1998 1 FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 13, 1998, at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:46 p.m. Submitted by: 4 kt'7t-� Lenora Crane Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Secretary H\WP.DTAIFINU101CRANETAHRTAHR98APRWNMIN.DOC CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 11222 ACACIA PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 3070, GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92642 Lo (714) 741-5100 GARDEN GROVE April 6, 1998 Mr. Don McIntyre, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Administration Building 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 RE: OUR MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1998 Dear Mr. McIntyre: I appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and the Strategic Plan Ad Hoc Committee to discuss Garden Grove's concerns regarding the Strategic Plan for Capital Improvements and CSDOC's proposed rate structure. As I said in the meeting, Garden Grove applauds the efforts of the Sanitation District; the work of the Planning Advisory Committee and the Rate Advisory Committee have been outstanding. The Ad Hoc Committee asked that we offer our thoughts on the issues that could be addressed in an economic impact analysis of the proposed rate structure. We believe an independent economic modeling study would include an analysis that identifies, at a minimum, the following points: • What is the elasticity of demand and how does the proposed rate structure impact it? • How would development be inhibited by the rate structure? • What industries would achieve a breakpoint in costs and where would this occur? • Which industries would be prompted to relocate as a result of the proposed rates and would this impact the revenues of the Sanitation District, creating alternative Capital Facility needs, therefore,changing the rate structure? • Can an incentive structure be incorporated into the rates which would assist impacted - businesses yet not be detrimental to the Sanitation District? Of course, you may wish to include other areas in the study which would assist your efforts. For instance, this study could permit you to develop the nexus for the rate structure and review those other issues necessary to complete your economic analysis. ' Orange County Sanitation District April6, 1998 Page 2 I-appreciate your willingness to approach the various cities and the county to assemble a technical advisory committee comprised from the communities served by the Sanitation District. When you convene this committee you may be assured that Garden Grove will be there. I was advised that your office sent a notice to the City announcing your establishment of a Technical Assistance Center to assist businesses and industries. This is a very important step in working with the business community to help them improve operations and streamline doing business in Orange County. This high level of customer service by the Sanitation District will certainly help improve the image of Orange County as a good place to do business. Thank you for the opportunity to meet with the Strategic Plan Ad Hoc Committee. If you need any additional information or want to discuss our comments further, please call me at the above number,Les Jones at 741-5375 or Mark Asturias at 741-5123. Sincerely, g dal City Mana GLT:MA:mi c: Mayor Bruce Broadwater Mayor pro tem Mark Leyes Les Jones Mark Asturias (p/ewnd"fmmk/s ftni/sudisi 7) FAHRCOMMITTEE MeedngDiM Texeas. 04/8/9e oa/n/ss AGENDA REPORT Hem NumE Itrm NumM County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance ^1I/ / Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager -- SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 1998 (FAHR98-25) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 1998. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), has served as the Districts' professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust as the Districts' third- party custodian, since September 1995. The Districts' Investment Policy, adopted by the Joint Boards, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The Districts' external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Districts' Investment Policy. The Districts' portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) \YaM1,WaC1My.CUNn\21QmrMFANTF.WRBBNMV\�N1RB6Yv.Gz RwaN: ,m,nv Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long- term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of March 199E is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the Districts' custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the Districts' funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated FundsLAccounts. March 31. 1998 Yield(%) State of Calif.LAIF $1,202,926 5.7 Union Bank Checking Account 380.712 5.0 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 4,574,000 5.1 PIMCO-Short-tens Portfolio 17,669,747 5A PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 293,202,333 5.2 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 3,196 5.7 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 32,674,422 6.2 Petty Cash 4,400 — Deferred Compensation 11,828.360 0.7-16.8 TOTAL y381 $40.096 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Reports GGS:SKIc \YMmli Ih .Et.NnUIDe -vAHWMRB RTAHRMM. RIbLB. 1bID117 Page 2 . . Districts' Fund Balances ❖:•:� ..... :❖:❖:� ..... R!!!! ;:;sXX ❖•❖•. ,❖•❖•� ,❖.❖.• •.•.•.•.•, -❖XXM•I �•❖•❖� :*ZXX. :::%% ,•.00 .❖.•.o• 000 r.❖.•.o :❖.❖a �•o❖.o *iii 4i: iiii:; ❖•••••� •❖•❖•� ,❖.•.•.� �.❖.❖, :❖•❖•� �••••••••� :❖.❖.� .❖.❖.� ,❖.❖.� �.❖.❖, ,❖.•.4$4 ❖.•.❖, MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 March 1998) Liquid Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: $17,669,748 p�� WCn0 $17,669,747 Historical Cost: PIMCO $17669,491 Mellon $17:669,489 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.15 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $26,765 (0.15%) 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 81% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0"/0 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return(°/u): I Month: 0.46 3 Months: 1.33 12 Months: 5.66 Year-to-Date: 1.33 Index Total Rate of Return(°/o): 1 Month: 0.44 A MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 March 1998) Long Term Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: M gg33 pp 996633 33 e11onO $2�3;202;333 Historical Cost: PIMCO $301,226,674 Mellon $293,936,909 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.42 Of Index: 2.32 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1% Change: $7,405,402 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: ("/n) I Month: 0.34 3 Months: 1.62 12 Months: 9.01 Year-to-Date: 1.62 Index Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 0.39 OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PINCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE!' USD' 31-MAR-1998 RB1100 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- -- ------------- ------- CASH a CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.88 0.88 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,378,356.01 2,370,356.01 13.33% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3,274,541.08 3,274,541.06 18.351 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 3,159,762.33 3,158,762.33 17.701 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED RM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 2,379,640.00 2,378,640.00 13.331 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 2,961,901.67 2,961,801.67 16.60% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 133,592.00 133,591.00 0.75% 0.00 5,009.66 3.75 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,285,692.97 14,295,692.97 90.07% 0.00 5,009.66 0.04 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,363,796.88 3,384,054.00 18.97% 257.12 161,500.00 4.77 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,383,796.88 3,384,054.00 18.97% 257.12 161,500.00 4.77 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 171,983.58 171,983.58 0.96% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 171,983.59 171,983.58 0.96% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ......o.......... .................. ........ ................. .............a-- ------- NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 17,841,473.43 17,841,730.55 100.00% 257.12 166,509.66 0.93 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-MAR-1998 HB1100 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.30 0.30 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 RECEIVABLES 7,350,820.31 7,350,820.31 2.41% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -63,052,089.37 -63,052,089.37 -20.63% 0.00 0.00 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - DOME 13,494,275.00 13,502,631.42 4.42% 8,356.42 803,250.00 5.95 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 1,736,429.00 1,736,429.00 0.57% 0.00 65,116.09 3.75 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS -40,470,564.76 -40,462,208.34 -13.24% 8,356.42 868,366.09 -2.15 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 208,021,473.89 207,167,428.22 67.78% -854,045.67 13,191,493.23 6.37 U.S. AGENCIES 40,177,501.70 40,815,222.50 13.35% 637,720.80 2,517,850.00 6.17 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 11,826,302.31 11,868,876.96 3.88% 42,574.65 812,311.73 6.84 FHLMC POOLS 19,390,455.68 19,348,548.42 6.33% -41,907.26 1,336,449.87 6.91 FHLMC MULTICLASS 5,005,468.75 5,006,700.00 1.64% 1,231.25 316,200.00 6.32 FNMA POOLS 4,857,003.37 4,952,482.41 1.59% -4,520.96 298,041.80 6.14 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGA 2,597,988.81 2,605,801.47 0.85% 7,812.66 161,161.75 6.18 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 479,589.09 480,731.53 0.16% 1,143.44 29,734.46 6.19 BANKING 6 FINANCE 39,498,731.22 39,405,440.05 12.89% -93,291.17 2,528,926.83 6.42 INDUSTRIAL 9,903,780.00 9,464,130.00 3.10% -439,650.00 832,500.00 8.80 __________________ _ ___ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 341,758,293.82 341,015,361.56 111.57% -742,932.26 22,024,669.67 6.46 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 5,094,218.94 5,094,218.94 1.67% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ____________ -------------- ____ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 5,094,218.94 5,094,218.94 1.67% 0.00 0.00 0.00 .................. ........ ............... ................ ....... NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 306,381,948.00 305,697,372.16 100.004 734,575.84 22,893,035.76 7.49 Page 1 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 1 GCSF075111D2 1998/03/31 RUN DATE 04/03/98 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 12.09.04 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH S CASH EQUIVALENTS 135,591.00 BSOT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 133,591.00 .93 999495906 PUBLIC II 133,591.00 .76 2,400,060.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 5.388 .000 P-1 99.110 2,378,640.00 16.65 313WSV89 MAT 04/03/1998 2,378,640.00 13.46 3,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN DISC 5.448 .000 P-1 98.760 3,061,547.94 21.43 313589NL3 MAT 05/06/1998 3,061,547.% 17.33 800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.503 .000 P-1 99.211 793,690.67 5.55 65743DD03 04/16/1998 793,690.67 4.49 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL ROME LN MTG CORP DISC 5.517 .000 P-1 99.104 2,477,596.64 17.34 333397VY4 MAT 04/24/1998 2,477,596.64 14.02 800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.520 .000 98.728 789,826.67 5.52 36959JDN0 04/22/1998 789,826.67 4.47 3,OOO,D00.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC HTS 5.527 .000 P-1 98.727 2,961,801.67 20.73 313313VQB MAT 04/16/1998 2,961,001.67 16.76 800,000.00 FORD KTR CR CO DISC 5.566 .000 99.355 794,838.67 5.56 34539UDN9 04/22/1998 794,838.67 4.50 100,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MG ASSN DISC 5.668 .000 P-1 97.214 97,214.39 .68 313589YG2 MAT 06/19/1998 97,214.39 .55 800,000.00 FED HOME LN HTG CORP DISC NTS 6.573 .000 P-1 99.618 796,944.44 5.57 313397VU2 MAT 04/20/1998 796,944.44 4.51 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.393 .058 14,285,692.09 100.00 14,285,692.09 $0.85 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.404 4.772 AAA 99.531 3,383,796.88 300.00 912827H66 04.750% 10/51/1999 DO 11/01/93 3,384,054.00 19.15 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE e 2 OMFO7511102 1998/05/51 RUN DATE 04/03/98 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME s 12.09.04 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ Y. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.404 4.772 3,383,796.85 100.00 3,364,054.00 19.25 TOTAL 3.393 .235 17,669,488.97 100.01 17,669,746.09 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE x 3 OCSF07522202 1998/03/31 RUN DATE x 04/03/98 ORANGE LTV-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME x 22.09.04 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK VIEW RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL _________________ __--------------------_------ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH a CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,736,429.00 BSOT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 1,736,429.00 11.39 99%95906 PUBLIC II 1,736,429.00 .49 13,500,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 5.994 5.%9 200.019 13,494,275.00 88.60 0663JOKU7 05.9SOZ 06/19/1998 OD 06/19/97 13,502,631.42 3.79 _____________ ------ TOTAL CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS 4.768 5.499 15,250,704.00 100.00 15,239,060.42 4.28 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 527,964.32 FNMA POOL 80065SOI .000 6.065 AAA 100.625 531,759.07 .15 31362MM7 6.391X OB/O1/2028 DD 09/01/88 531,264.30 .15 4,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN TRANCHE OTR 96 .000 5.387 Al 100.234 3,970,480.00 1.17 M54DUZI FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 4,009,360.00 1.13 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR 0 00177 .000 5.512 Al 99.781 6,999,748.00 2.07 345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DD 03/30/94 7,084,451.00 1.99 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT .000 6.167 A3 100.334 2,999,310.00 .88 423328AZ6 FLTO RT 04/27/1999 GO 04/27/94 3,010,020.00 .84 7,062,720.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.654 3.662 AAA 99.000 7,053,698.65 2.05 912827US 3,625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 6,992,092.80 1.96 10,199,100.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.735 3.481 AAA 96.953 9,919,910.47 2.89 9128272M3 3.375X O1/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 9,888,333.42 2.78 16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.430 6.821 AAA 109.953 17,925,000.00 5.15 912827SOG 07.500X 02/15/2005 DD 02/15/95 17,592,480.00 4.94 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OMF07522202 1998/03/31 RUN DATE 04/03/98 ORANGE CTY-LDNG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 12.09.04 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 15,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.562 5.865 AAA 100.172 15,045,117.19 4.40 912827270 05.875Y. 10/31/1998 DD 10/31/96 15,025,800.00 4.22 8,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.602 5.622 AAA 100.047 8,502,612.41 2.49 9128273R1 05.625Y. 12/31/1999 DD 12/31/97 8,503,995.00 2.39 52,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.627 6.760 AAA 101.703 53,883,310.97 15.74 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD OS/31/94 53,699,184.00 15.07 28,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.663 6.311 AAA 103.000 28,980,981.84 8.45 9128272WI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 28,840,000.00 8.10 16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.66E 5.733 AAA 1D0.297 16,030,100.89 4.70 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 OD 10/31/95 16,047,520.00 4.50 27,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.683 7.D81 AAA 1D5.922 29,146,743.53 8.51 91282MU 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 29,022,628.00 8.15 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.409 AAA 103.375 3,613,203.13 1.06 9128272SO 06.625% 04/30/2002 DD 04/30/97 3,618,125.00 1.02 2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONGS 5.857 6.684 AAA 130.906 2,663,639.50 .76 912810DY1 08.750% 05/25/2017 DD 05/15/87 2,618,120.00 .73 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NWTL NTG ASSN MTN 5.871 5.874 AAA 100.094 5,000,781.25 1.46 31364FFMB 5.880Y. 11/03/1999 DD 11/03/97 5,004,700.00 1.40 3,620,124.21 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-D CL A 5.957 5.897 AAA 100.046 3,620,612.87 1.06 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 3,629,793.15 1.02 908,928.09 FNMA POOL #0313783 6.093 6.104 AAA 300.625 915,461.01 .26 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 OD 10/01/97 914,608.89 .26 1,017,085.41 FNMA POOL #0313371 6.142 6.156 AAA 300.625 1,024,395.71 .30 31374GCG0 6.194Y. 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 1,023,442.19 .29 980,774.84 FNMA POOL 00313600 6.144 6.171 AAA 100.625 987,824.16 .28 31374MKO 6.210% 05/01/2036 DD 06/01/97 986,904.66 .28 448,768.68 FNMA POOL 00238575 6.149 6.160 AM 200.625 451,994.21 .13 31370Q6L8 6.1992 03/01/2033 DD 09/01/93 451,573.48 .13 242,902.70 FNMA POOL 40313769 6.157 6.167 AM 300.625 244,648.56 .07 31374GQWG 6.206% OS/01/2036 DD 09/01/97 244,420.84 .07 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE x 5 OCSF07522202 1998/03/31 RUN DATE x 04/03/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RIM TIME x 12.09.04 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY HARAEY TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE HARKEY VALUE 7. TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ -__----__- 695,918.74 FNMA POOL 60339016 6.158 6.168 AAA 100.625 700,920.65 .20 31375KSD6 6.207% 11/01/2035 DD 03/01/96 700,268.23 .20 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.162 8.917 AAA 124.766 6,233,393.75 1.82 912810DES 11.125X 08/15/2003 DD 07/05/83 6,238,300.00 1.75 479,SBB.10 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.185 AAA 100.238 479,386.09 .14 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 480,731.53 .13 2,603,582.44 CONTINORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 6.213 6.185 AAA 100.085 2,597,988.81 .76 21075MOK8 6.190% 30/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 2,605,801.47 .73 5,O00,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.277 6.127 AAA 102.000 4,9%,531.25 1.49 9128272L5 06.250X OV28/2002 OD O2/28/97 51100,000.00 1.43 4,SDO,000.00 FEDERAL HATL MG ASSN MTN 6.291 6.145 AAA 1U1.375 4,488,705.00 1.33 31364CKV5 6.23D2 03/01/2002 OD 03/03/97 4,561,875.00 1.28 5,000,000.00 FHLNC NULTICLASS CTF E3 A 6.316 6.316 AAA 100.134 510051468.75 1.46 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 5,006,700.00 1.41 4,500,000.DO CATERPILLAR FINL NTHS THROW 6.322 5.783 A2 99.946 4,466,745.00 1.31 14912LSE2 8.780% 07/15/1998 DD 12/15/95 4,497,570.00 1.26 5,000,000.00 LERHAN GROS HLDGS MN 800196 6.364 6.593 BAA1 100.859 51039,450.00 1.47 52517PJD4 6.650% 11/08/2000 00 12/08/96 5,042,950.00 1.42 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 6.425 6.650 A2 101.498 1,317,619.35 .38 073902AM8 6.7507. 05/01/2001 DD 04/26/96 1,324,548.90 .37 1,000,000.00 CNRYSLER FINL HTN TR 0 00335 6.514 6.253 A3 100.115 993,160.00 .29 17120QPYI 6.260% 07/20/1998 DO 07/18/95 1,001,150.00 .28 3,700,000.00 GENERAL WKS ACCEP HTH TR00324 6.532 8.214 A3 101.957 319111640.00 1.10 37042RPM8 8.375% 02/03/1999 DD 0/03/95 3,772,409.00 1.06 5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLHC GOLD 6.561 6.566 AAA 99.000 5,458,320.31 1.59 999ACA709 6.500X 05/15/2028 5,445,000.00 1.53 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HTG ASSN HTN 6.577 6.466 AAA 102.453 8,012,576.00 2.40 31364CBD9 6.625% 04/18/2001 OD 04/18/96 8,196,240.O0 2.30 2,900,000.00 CNRYSLER FIHL HTN TR 6 00306 6.591 7.267 A3 100.042 2,952,896.00 .85 17120QNT4 7.270% 04/13/1998 DD 04/13/95 2,901,218.00 .81 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OMF07SZ2202 1998/03/31 RUN DATE 04/03/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 12.09.04 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY ➢ESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ -_________ 9,ODO,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 6.593 8.796 A2 105.157 9,903,780.00 2.77 718154BB2 9.25OX 02/IS/2000 9,464,130.00 2.66 19,092,140.97 FHLMC GROUP RCS-0476 6.628 6.907 AAA 101.343 19,390,455.68 5.67 3128DDQSS 7.000% OV01/2003 DO 02/01/98 19,S48,S48.42 5.43 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL KATL MTG ASSN MTH 6.636 5.709 AAA 98.797 9,593,750.00 2.89 313646NF3 5.640X 02/20/2001 DD 02/20/96 9,879,700.00 2.77 3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 6.660 6.262 A3 104.399 3,227,07D.00 .91 37042RKQ4 8.6ZS% 1/10/200D DO V10195 3,131,970.00 .88 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN HTO CORP DEBS 6.713 6.053 AAA 98.953 4,851,562.50 1.45 31MAOMS 5.99OX 03/06/2001 DD 03/06/96 4.947,650.00 1.39 5,515,924.21 GNHA II POOL R080088M 6.828 6.843 AAA 102.297 5.636.585.06 1.65 36225=20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 5,642,624.99 1.58 2,219,399.26 DUNA II POOL 00008684 6.865 6.837 AAA 102.392 2,256,708.09 .66 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO OB/01/95 2,272,669.78 .64 3.868,930.00 GNMA II POOL 90080023 6.869 6.850 AAA 102.188 3,933,009.16 1.15 36225CAZ9 7.000Y. 12/20/2026 ➢O 12/01/96 3,953,582.19 1.11 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB FHLMC GOLD 6.903 6.924 AAA 101.093 2,771,806.64 .81 999ACE925 7.000% 05/15/2028 2,780,057.50 .78 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 8.321 AAA 1S9.254 4,029,030.31 1.16 912810DJ4 13.2502 05/15/2014 DD 05/15/84 3,980'"0.00 1.12 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES 5.236 6.269 342,758,293.82 100.00 341,C15:361.56 95.74 ________ _______ ----------------- _______-- TOTAL 5.236 6.267 356,988,997.82 180.00 356,254:421.98 100.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/RASE RASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CUBA GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 25-NAR-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 31374GRC3 FNMA POOL #0313783 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 17-MAR-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128272NI U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CN 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO O6/02/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 20-MAR-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128272W1 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO O6/02/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 23-MAR-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128272NI U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CH 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 09-MAR-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273RI U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.625% 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 09-MAR-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273RI U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CN 05.625% 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 09-MAR-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273R1 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CN 05.625% 12/31/1999 DD 12/31/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 16-MAR-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 99347P322 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ CW 05.440% 03/16/1999 DO 03/13/98 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 19-14AR-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 99347R328 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.5001 03/19/1998 DO 03/17/98 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH S CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 27-MAR-1999 -696,236.53 -696,236.53 99.462361 26354BE40 05/04/1998 30-MAR-1998 696,236.53 696,236.53 99.462361 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 27-MAR-1998 -696,236.53 -696,236.53 99.462361 26354BE40 05/04/1998 30-MAR-1998 -696,236.53 0.00 99.462361 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 4 CO, NY 30-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NTS 26-MAR-1998 -796,944.44 -796,944.44 99.618055 313397VU2 MAT 04/20/1998 26-MAR-1998 796,944.44 796,944.44 99.618055 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CON ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.OD FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC HIS 26-MAR-1998 -796,944.44 -796,944.44 99.618055 313397VU2 MAT 04/20/1998 26-MAR-1998 -796,944.44 0.00 99.618055 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 26-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FORD MIA CA CO DISC 11-MAR-1998 -794,838.67 -794,838.67 99.354634 34539UDN9 04/22/1998 11-MAR-1998 794,838.67 794,838.67 99.354834 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FORD MTR CA CO DISC 11-MAR-1998 -794,838.67 -794,838.67 99.354834 34539UDN9 04/22/1998 11-MAR-1998 -794,838.67 0.00 99.354834 PC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 11-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.ODDD00000 0.00 Page 2 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 24-MAR-1998 -5,680,667.50 -5,680,667.50 99.660833 36959JDF7 04/15/1998 24-MAR-1998 5,680,667.50 5,680,667.50 99.660833 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 24-MAR-1998 -5,680,667.50 -5,680,667.50 99.660833 36959JDF7 04/15/1998 24-MAR-1998 -5,680,667.50 0.00 99.660933 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI) , 24-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 25-MAR-1998 -199,321.67 -199,321.67 99.660833 36959JDG5 04/16/1998 25-MAR-1996 199,321.67 199,321.67 99.660033 B GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 25-MAR-1998 -199,321.67 -199,321.67 99.660833 36959JDG5 04/16/1998 25-MAR-1998 -199,321.67 0.00 99.660833 PC GOLDMAN SACHS c CO, NY 25-MAR-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO $00,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 02-MAR-1998 -497,235.00 -497,235.00 99.447000 97665SD72 04/07/1998 02-MAR-1998 497,235.00 497,235.00 99.447000 B GOLDMAN SACHS a CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 02-MAR-1998 -497,235.00 -497,235.00 99.447000 97665SD72 04/07/1998 02-MAR-1998 -497,235.00 0.00 99.447000 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 02-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 13-MAR-1998 -7,600,000.00 -7,600,000.00 100.000000 99347P322 05.440% 03/16/1998 DO 03/13/98 13-MAR-1998 7,600,000.00 7,600,000.00 100.000D00 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 13-MAR-199B -7,600,000.00 -7,600,000.00 100.000000 99347P322 05.4401 03/16/1998 DO 03/13/98 13-MAR-1998 -7,600,000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC, NY 13-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 3 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 17-MAR-1998 -1,500,000.00 -11500,000.00 100.000000 99347R328 05.500% 03/19/1998 DO 03/17/98 17-MAR-1998 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 100.000000 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 17-MAR-1999 -1,500,000.00 -1,500,000.00 100.000000 99347R328 05.500% 03/19/1998 DO 03/17/98 17-MAR-1998 -1,500,000.00 0.00 100.000000 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COB 17-MAR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,347.53 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 25-MAR-1998 -2,347.53 -2,347.53 1.000000 996087094 VAR AT DD 06/26/1997 25-MAR-1998 2,347.53 2,347.53 1.000000 B 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 582.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-MAR-1998 582.00 -582.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 02-MAR-1998 502.00 582.00 1.000000 B 02-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,615,773.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-MAR-1998 -1,615,773.00 -1,615,773.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 02-MAR-1998 1,615,773.00 1,615,773.00 1.000000 B 02-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 149,750.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 06-14AR-1999 -149,750.00 -149,750.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 06-MAR-1998 149,750.00 149,750.00 1.000000 B 06-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 5,162.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 11-MAR-1998 -5,162.00 -5,162.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 11-MAR-1998 5,162.00 5,162.00 1.000000 B 11-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,177,295.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 13-14AR-1998 -1,177,295.00 -1,177,295.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 13-MAR-1998 1,177,295.00 1,177,295.00 1.000000 B 13-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 4 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD , O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,845,925.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 16-MAR-1998 -1,845,925.00 -1,845,925.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 16-MAR-1998 1,845,925.00 1,845,925.00 1.000000 B 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 374,212.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 19-MAR-1998 -374,212.00 -374,212.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 19-MAR-1998 374,212.00 374,212.00 1.000000 B 19-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,347.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 26-MAR-1998 -2,347.00 -2,347.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 26-MAR-1998 2,347.00 2,347.00 1.000000 B 26-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,055.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 26-MAR-1998 -3,055.00 -3,055.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 26-MAR-1998 3,055.00 3,055.00 1.000000 B 26-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 548,495.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 31-MAR-1998 -548,495.00 -548,495.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 31-MAR-1998 548,495.00 548,495.00 1.000000 B 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FBLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 11-MAR-1998 -5.005,468.75 -5,005,468.75 100.209375 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 23-APR-1998 5,005,468.75 5,005,468.75 100.109375 B BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FHLMC MULTICLASS CTF E3 A 11-MAR-1998 -19,323.33 -19,323.33 100.109375 3133TCE95 6.324% 08/15/2032 23-APR-1998 0.00 0.00 100.109375 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NY 16-MAR-1998 -2,999,310.00 -2,999,310.00 99.977000 Page 5 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 423328AZ6 FLTG AT 04/27/1999 DO 04/27/94 19-MAR-1998 2,999,310.00 2,999,310.00 99.977000 B MORGAN STANLEY a CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT 16-MAR-1998 -24,968.75 -24,968.75 99.977000 423328AZ6 FLTG RT 04/27/1999 DO 04/27/94 19-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 99.977000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 HELLER FINL INC SR NT 16-MAR-1998 -3,024,278.75 -3,024,278.75 99.977000 423328AZ6 FLTG AT 04/27/1999 DO 04/27/94 19-MAR-1998 -3,024,278.75 0.00 99.977000 FC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 19-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 22-JAN-1998 -4,134,551.91 -4,134,551.91 160.806800 912810DJ4 13.250% 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 20-MAR-1998 -4,134,551.91 0.00 160.806800 FC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-1998 -2,714,948.20 -2,714,948.20 132.895200 91281ODY1 08.750% 05/15/2017 DD 05/15/87 13-MAR-1998 -2,714,948.20 0.00 132.895200 FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 13-MAR-1996 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-FEB-1998 -19,096,351.07 -19,096,351.07 106.615100 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 16-MAR-1998 -19,096,351.07 0.00 106.615100 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 -10,789,535.40 -10,789,535.40 106.478300 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 16-MAR-1998 -10,789,535.40 0.00 106.478300 FC HONG KONG 6 SHANGHAI BKG CORP, 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-MAR-1998 -16,016,250.00 -16,016,250.00 100.101562 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 31-MAR-1998 16,016,250.00 16,016,250.00 100.101562 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 6 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE.' USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-MAR-1998 -383,756.91 -383,756.91 100.101562 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 100.101562 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-MAR-1998 -16,400,006.91 -16,400,006.91 100.101562 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 31-MAR-1998 -16,400,006.91 0.00 100.101562 FC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-MAR-1998 -10,124,108.70 -10,124,108.70 100.238700 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 08-MAY-1998 10,124,108.70 10,124,108.70 100.238700 B MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-MAR-1998 -12,625.00 -12,625.00 100.238700 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 08-MAY-1998 0.00 0.00 100.238700 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-MAR-1998 -10,124,108.70 -10,124,108.70 100.238700 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 08-MAY-1998 10,124,108.70 10,124,108.70 100.238700 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-MAR-1998 -12,625.00 -12,625.00 100.238700 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 08-MAY-1998 0.00 0.00 100.238700 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JAN-1998 -2,753,371.03 -2,753,371.03 104.059600 9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 13-MAR-1998 -2,753,371.03 0.00 104.059600 FC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 13-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1998 -25,584,768.94 -25,584,768.94 103.882900 9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 13-MAR-1998 -25,584,768.94 0.00 103.882900 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 13-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 7 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000,00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 -1,054,636.86 -1,054,636.86 103.624400 9128272W1 06.5004 05/31/2002 DO O6/02/97 13-MAR-1998 -1,054,636.86 0.00 103.624400 PC HONG KONG 6 SHANGHAI BKG CORP, 13-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-MAR-1998 -21,506,035.20 -21,506,035.20 103.394400 9128272NI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO O6/02/97 09-APR-1998 21,506,035.20 21,506,035.20 103.394400 B BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-MAR-1998 -482,857.14 -482,857.14 103.394400 9120272VI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 09-APR-1998 0.00 0.00 103.394400 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-MAR-1998 -1,862,339.40 -1,862,339.40 103.463300 9128272WI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 09-APR-1998 1,862,339.40 1,862,339.40 103.463300 B BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-MAR-1999 -41,785.71 -41,785.71 103.463300 9128272WI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 09-APR-1998 0.00 0.00 103.463300 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-MAR-1998 -3,309,876.90 -3,308,876.80 103.402400 9128272N1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 09-APR-1998 3,308,876.80 3,308,876.80 103.402400 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-14AR-1998 -74,285.71 -74,285.71 103.402400 9128272NI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO O6/02/97 09-APR-1998 0.00 0.00 103.402400 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-MAR-1998 -6,003,281.25 -6,003,291.25 100.054687 9128273R1 05.625% 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 04-MAR-1998 6,003,281.25 6,003,291.25 100.054687 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 8 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-MAR-1998 -58,736.19 -58,736.29 100.054687 9128273R1 05.6251 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 04-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 100.054687 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-MAR-1998 -6,062,017.44 -6,062,017.44 100.054687 9128273RI 05.625% 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 04-MAR-1998 -6,062,017.44 0.00 100.054687 PC LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ 04-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-MAR-1998 -2,500,000.00 -2,500,000.00 100.000000 9128273RI 05.625% 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 09-APR-1998 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 100.000000 B MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-MAR-1998 -38,458.22 -38,458.22 100.000000 9128273RI 05.625% 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 09-APR-1998 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-MAR-1999 -2,499,850.00 -2,499,850.00 99.994000 9128273R1 05.625% 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 09-APR-1998 2,499,850.00 2,499,850.00 99.994000 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-MAR-1998 -38,458.22 -38,458.22 99.994000 9128273RI 05.625% 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 09-APR-1998 0.00 0.00 99.994000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 27-JAN-1998 7,304,375.00 7,304,375.00 100.750000 999ABV357 7.000% 02/15/2008 13-APR-1998 -7,304,375.00 -7,304.375.00 100.750000 BC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,500,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 18-MAR-1998 -5,458,320.31 -5,458,320.31 99.242187 999ACA709 6.500% 05/15/2028 13-MAY-1999 5,459,320.31 5,458,320.31 99.242187 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 9 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 02-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LASS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT 70 PUR FHLMC 09-FEB-1998 -2,782,656.25 -2,782,656.25 101.187500 999ACA766 7.000% 03/01/2028 12-MAR-1998 -2,782,656.25 0.00 101.187500 PC GREENNICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 12-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 27-JAN-1999 -7,304,375.00 -7,304,375.00 100.750000 999ACE925 7.000% 05/15/2028 13-APR-1998 7,304,375.00 7,304,375.00 100.750000 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 09-MAR-1998 -2,774,921.88 -2,774,921.88 100.906250 999ACE925 7.0001 05/15/2028 13-MAY-1998 2,774,921.80 2,774,921.08 100.906250 B GREENNICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,800.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1998 -17,800.00 -17,800.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JAN-1998 17,800.00 17,800.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,800.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1999 -17,800.00 -17,800.00 100.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 15-JAN-1998 -17,800.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -67,970.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1998 67,970.00 67,970.00 100.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/25/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-JAN-1998 -67,970.00 -67,970.00 100.000000 PUC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -67,970.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1998 67,970.00 67,970.00 100.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-JAN-1998 67,970.00 0.00 100.000000 FCC 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 10 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST _ CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 12,390.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1998 -12,390.00 -12,390.00 100.000000 9128273A8 3.6251 07/15/2002 DO 07/25/97 15-JAN-1998 22,390.00 12,390.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,390.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1998 -12,390.00 -12,390.00 100.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/15/97 15-JAN-1998 -12,390.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASK EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-MAR-1998 990,833.33 990,933.33 99.083333 26354BDU3 04/28/1998 04-MAR-1998 -990.033.33 -990,633.33 99.083333 S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-MRR-1998 687.50 687.50 99.083333 26354BDU3 04/28/1998 04-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 99.083333 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-MAR-1990 991,520.83 991,520.83 99.083333 26354BDU3 04/28/1998 04-MAR-1990 991,520.83 0.00 99.083333 PC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 04-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 31-KAR-1998 696,236.53 696,236.53 99.462361 26354BE40 05/04/1998 31-KAR-1998 -696,236.53 -696,236.53 99.462361 S GOLDMAN SACKS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 DO PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 31-MAR-1998 74.47 74.47 99.462361 26354BE40 05/04/1998 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 99.462361 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PINCO -700,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 31-MAR-1998 696,311.00 696,311.00 99.462361 26354BE40 05/04/1998 31-MAR-1998 696,311.00 0.00 99.462361 FC GOLDMAN SACKS 6 CO, NY 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IRV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 31-MAR-1998 5,680,667.50 5,680,667.50 99.660833 36959JDF7 04/15/1998 31-MAR-1998 -5,680,667.50 -5,680,667.50 99.660833 S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 31-MAR-1998 5,913.75 5,913.75 99.660833 36959JDF7 04/15/1998 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 99.660833 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,700,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 31-MAR-1998 5,686,581.25 5,686,581.25 99.660833 36959JDF7 04/15/1998 31-MAR-1998 5,686,581.25 0.00 99.660833 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 O.OD LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 31-MAR-1998 199,321.67 199,321.67 99.660835 36959JDG5 04/16/1998 31-MAR-1998 -199,321.67 -199,321.67 99.660835 S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 31-MAR-1998 176.11 176.11 99.660935 36959JDGS 04/16/1998 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 99.660835 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 31-MAR-1998 199,497.78 199,497.78 99.660935 36959JDG5 04/16/1998 31-MAR-1998 199,497.78 0.00 99.660835 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 31-HAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 WICONSIN EL PWR DISC 04-MAR-1998 595,966.67 595,966.67 99.327778 97665SDA5 04/10/1998 04-MAR-1998 -595,966.67 -595,966.67 99.327778 S GOLD14AN SACHS a CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -600,000.00 WICONSIN EL PWR DISC 04-14AR-1998 598.50 598.50 99.327778 97665SDA5 04/10/1998 04-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 99.327779 Page 12 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LASS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 NICONSIN EL PNR DISC 04-MAR-1998 596,565.17 596,565.17 99.327778 97665SDA5 04/10/1998 04-MAR-1998 596,565.17 0.00 99.327778 FC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 04-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PNR DISC 04-NAR-1998 198,894.00 198,894.00 99.447000 97665SD72 04/07/1998 04-MAR-1998 -198,894.00 -198,894.00 99.447000 S GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMOO -200,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PNR DISC 04-14AR-1998 53.89 53.89 99.447000 97665SD72 04/07/1998 04-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 99.447000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 NISCONSIN EL PMR DISC 04-MAR-1998 198,947.89 198,947.89 99.447000 97665SD72 04/07/1998 04-MAR-1998 198,947.89 0.00 99.447000 PC GOLDMAN SACHS 6 CO, NY 04-HAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -300,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PNR DISC 16-MAR-1998 298,341.00 298,341.00 99.447000 97665SD72 04/07/1998 16-MAR-1998 -298,341.00 -298,341.00 99.447000 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PNR DISC 16-MAR-1998 634.17 634.17 99.447000 97665SD72 04/07/1998 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 99.447000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 NISCONSIN EL PMR DISC 16-MAR-1998 298,975.17 298,975.17 99.447000 97665SD72 04/07/1998 16-MAR-1998 298,975.17 0.00 99.447000 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-MAR-1998 7,600,000.00 7,600,000.00 100.000000 Page 13 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IRV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 99347P322 05.440% 03/16/1998 DO 03/13/98 16-MAR-1998 -7,600,000.00 -7,600,000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN DOW SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-MAR-1998 3,445.33 3,445.33 100.000000 99347P322 05.440% 03/16/1998 DO 03/13/98 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,600,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 16-MAR-1998 7,603,445.33 7,603,445.33 100.000000 99347P322 05.440% 03/16/199B DO 03/13/98 16-MAR-1998 7,603,445.33 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 19-MAR-1998 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 100.000000 99347R328 05.500% 03/19/1998 DO 03/17/98 19-MAR-1998 -1,500,000.00 -11500,000.00 100.000000 S CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 19-MAR-1998 459.33 458.33 100.000000 99347R328 05.500% 03/19/1998 DD 03/17/98 19-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- O.DO 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 19-MAR-1996 1,500,458.33 1,500,458.33 100.000000 99347R328 05.500% 03/19/1998 DO 03/17/98 19-MAR-1998 1,500,458.33 0.00 100.000000 PC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 19-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,347.53 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 26-MAR-1998 2,347.53 2,347.53 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 26-MAR-1998 -2,347.53 -2,347.53 1.000000 S 26-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.DOOOOD000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,750,510.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 04-MAR-1998 1,750,510.00 1,750,510.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 04-MAR-1999 -1,750,510.00 -1,750,510.00 1.000000 S 04-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 14 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O2-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -9.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 09-MAR-1998 9.00 9.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 09-MAR-1998 -9.00 -9.00 1.000000 S 09-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -859.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 12-MAR-1998 859.00 859.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 12-MAR-1998 -859.00 -859.00 1.000000 S 12-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,472,105.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 17-MAR-1998 1,472,105.00 1,472,105.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 17-MAR-1998 -1,472,105.00 -1,472,105.00 1.000000 S 17-14AR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -116,788.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 20-MAR-1998 116,788.00 116,788.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 20-MAR-1998 -116,788.00 -116,788.00 1.000000 S 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 23-MAR-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 23-MAR-1998 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S 23-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -693,201.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 24-MAR-1998 683,201.00 683,201.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 24-MAR-1990 -683,201.00 -683,201.00 1.000000 S 24-MAR-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -22,823.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 25-MAR-1998 22,823.00 22,823.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 25-MAR-1998 -22,823.00 -22,823.00 1.000000 S 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -599,599.00 BRUT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 30-MAR-1998 599,599.00 599,599.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 30-MAR-1998 -599,599.00 -599,599.00 1.000000 S 30-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-KAR-1998 - 31-KAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -4,950,000.07 FNMA POOL #0313783 12-MAR-1998 4,977,843.83 4,977,843.83 100.562500 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/O1/97 24-KAR-1998 -4,985,578.19 -4,985,578.19 100.562500 S BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -7,734.36 -7,734.36 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,950,000.07 FNMA POOL #0313783 12-MAR-1998 19,623.31 19,623.31 100.562500 31374GRC3 6.1424 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-KAR-1998 0.00 0.00 100.562500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIKCO -4,950,000.07 FNMA POOL #0313783 12-MAR-1998 4,997,467.14 4,997,467.14 100.562500 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-MAR-1998 4,997,467.14 0.00 100.562500 PC BEAR STEARNS 6 CO INC, NY 24-KAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-MAR-1998 10,125,250.00 10,125,250.00 100.250000 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 31-MAR-1998 -10,110,257.81 -10,110,257.81 100.250000 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- 14,992.19 14,992.19 1.000000000 0.00 TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-MAR-1998 242,246.55 242,246.55 100.250000 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DD 10/31/95 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 100.250000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-MAR-1998 10,367,496.55 10,367,496.55 100.250000 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 31-MAR-1998 10,367,496.55 0.00 100.250000 FC MORGAN STANLEY 4 CO INC, NY 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-KAR-1998 21,515,000.00 21,515,000.00 103.437500 9128272NI D6.5004 05/31/2002 DO O6/02/97 16-MAR-1998 -21,532,203.92 -21,532,203.92 103.437500 S BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- -17,203.92 -17,203.92 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-MAR-1998 393,714.29 393,714.29 103.437500 9128272NI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 103.437500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 16 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -20,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 13-MAR-1998 21,908,714.29 21,908,714.29 103.437500 9128272M1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 16-MAR-1998 21,908,714.29 0.00 103.437500 FC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 16-14AR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-MAR-1998 1,863,000.00 1,863,000.00 103.500000 9128272WI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 19-MAR-1998 -1,863,363.80 -1,863,363.80 103.500000 S BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- -363.80 -363.80 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-MAR-1998 35,035.71 35,035.71 103.500000 9128272N1 06.5001 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 29-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 103.500000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-MAR-1998 1,898,035.71 1,898,035.71 103.500000 9128272WI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO O6/02/97 19-MAR-1998 1,898,035.71 0.00 103.500000 FC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 19-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-MAR-1998 3,310,000.00 3,310,000.00 103.437500 9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 20-MAR-1998 -3,312,529.68 -3,312,529.68 103.437500 S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -2,529.68 -2,529.68 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-MAR-1998 62,857.14 62,857.14 103.437500 9128272N1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 103.437500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 19-MAR-1998 3,372,857.14 3,372,857.14 103.437500 9128272NI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 20-MAR-1998 3,372,857.14 0.00 103.437500 FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-MAR-1998 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 100.000000 9128273R1 05.6251 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 04-14AR-1998 -2,500,518.84 -2,500,518.84 100.000000 Page 17 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ S MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY ----------- -518.84 -510.84 1.00ODDD000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-MAR-1998 24,473.41 24,473.41 100.000000 9328273R1 05.6251 12/31/1999 DO 12/31/97 04-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-MAR-1998 2,524,473.41 2,524,473.41 100.000000 9128273RI 05.625% 12/31/1999 DD 12/31/97 04-MAR-1998 2,524,473.41 0.00 100.000000 FC MORGAN STANLEY 6 CO INC, NY 04-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 09-MAR-1998 2,782,796.88 2,791,796.88 101.156250 999ACA766 7.000% 03/01/2028 12-MAR-1998 -2,782,656.25 -2,782,656.25 101.156250 S GREENNICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- -859.37 -959.37 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 09-MAR-1998 2,781,796.89 2,781,796.88 101.156250 999ACA766 7,000% 03/01/2028 12-MAR-1998 2,781,796.88 0.00 101.156250 PC GREENNICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 12-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 18-MAR-1998 7,350,820.31 7,350,820.31 101.390625 999ACE925 7.000% 05/15/2028 13-APR-1998 -7,307,490.24 -7,307,490.24 101.390625 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 43,330.07 43,330.07 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -248,294.83 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-MAR-1998 248,294.83 248,294.83 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-MAR-1998 -247,780.78 -247,780.78 100.000000 PD ----------- 514.05 514.05 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -248,294.83 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-MAR-1998 248,294.83 248,294.83 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-MAR-1998 248,294.83 0.00 100.000000 PC 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 18 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST _ CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-2998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE KRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -896,417.59 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-MAR-1998 896,417.59 896,417.59 200.000000 21075WDKB 6.190% 10/15/2011 DD 11/23/96 01-MAR-1998 -894,491.69 -894,491.69 200.000000 PD ----------- 1,925.90 1,925,90 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 896,417.59 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-MAR-1998 -896,417.59 -896,417.59 100.000000 21075WDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-MAR-1999 894,491.69 894,491.69 100.000000 PDC ----------- -1,925.90 -1,925.90 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -473,059.99 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-MAR-1998 473,059.99 473,059.99 100.000000 21075WDKO 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-MAR-1990 -472,043.65 -472,043.65 100.000000 PD ----------- 1,016.34 1,016.34 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -473,059.99 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-MAR-1998 473,059.99 473,059.99 100.000000 23075WDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-MAR-1998 473,059.99 0.00 100.000000 FC 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -908,388.03 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-MAR-1998 908,388.03 908,398.03 100.000000 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 01-MAR-1999 -922,581.59 -922,581.59 100.000000 PD ----------- -14,193.56 -14,193.56 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -908,388.03 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 01-MAR-1998 908,388.03 908,398.03 100.000000 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 01-MAR-1998 908,388.03 0.00 100.000000 PC 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,303.95 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-MAR-1998 8,303.95 8,303.95 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DD 09/01/88 01-MAR-1998 -8,363.63 -8,363.63 100.000000 PD ----------- -59.68 -59.68 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,303.95 FNMA POOL #0065581 01-MAR-1998 -8,303.95 -8,303.95 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-MAR-1998 8,363.63 8,363.63 100.000000 PDC ----------- 59.68 59.68 1.000000000 0.00 Page 19 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO -8,303.94 FNMA POOL 40065581 01-MAR-1998 8,303.94 8,303.94 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-MAR-1998 -8,363.62 -8,363.62 100.000000 PD ----------- -59.68 -59.68 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,303.94 FNMA POOL 90065581 01-MAR-1998 8,303.94 8,303.94 100.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DD 09/01/88 01-MAR-1998 8,303.94 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,963.16 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-MAR-1998 4,963.16 4,963.16 100.000000 31370Q6L8 6.191% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-MAR-1998 -4,998.83 -4,998.83 100.000000 PD ----------- -35.67 -35.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,963.16 FNMA POOL 60238575 01-MAR-1998 -4,963.16 -4,963.16 100.000000 3137006L8 6.191% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-MAR-1998 4,998.83 4,998.83 100.000000 PDC ----------- 35.67 35.67 1.000000000 O.OD LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO -4,963.16 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-MAR-1998 4,963.16 4,963.16 100.000000 3137006L8 6.199% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-MAR-1998 -4,998.83 -4,998.83 100.000000 PD ----------- -35.67 -35.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,963.16 FNMA POOL #0238575 01-MAR-1998 -4,963.16 -4,963.16 100.000000 3137006L8 6.199% 03/01/2033 DD 09/01/93 01-MAR-1998 4,998.83 4,998.83 100.000000 PDC ----------- 35.67 35.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,963.16 FNMA POOL 40238575 01-MAR-1998 4,963.16 4,963.16 100.000000 3137006LB 6.199% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-MAR-1998 -4,998.83 -4,998.83 100.000000 PD ----------- -35.67 -35.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,963.16 FNMA POOL 00238575 01-MAR-1998 4,963.16 4,963.16 100.000000 31370Q6L8 6.199% 03/01/2033 DD 09/01/93 01-MAR-1998 4,963.16 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-14AR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 20 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-14AR-1998 TH100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,789.94 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-MAR-1998 12,789.94 12,789.94 100.000000 31374GCGO 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-MAR-1998 -12,881.87 -12,881.87 100.000000 PD ----------- -91.93 -91.93 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,789.94 FNMA POOL #0313371 01-MAR-1998 12,789.94 12,789.94 100.000000 31374GCGO 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 01-MAR-1998 12,789.94 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,225.65 FNMA POOL 10313600 01-MAR-1998 9,225.65 9,225.65 100.000000 31374GKM8 6.193% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-MAR-1998 -9,291.96 -9,291.96 100.000000 PD ----------- -66.31 -66.31 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,225.65 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-MAR-1998 -9,225.65 -9,225.65 100.000000 31374GKMB 6.193% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-MAR-1998 9,291.96 9,291.96 100.000000 PDC ----------- 66.31 66.31 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,225.65 FNMA POOL 10313600 01-MAR-1998 9,225.65 9,225.65 100.000000 31374GKMS 6.210% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-MAR-1998 -9,291.96 -9,291.96 100.000000 PD -66.31 -66.31 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,225.65 FNMA POOL #0313600 01-MAR-1998 9,225.65 9,225.65 100.000000 31374GKMO 6.210% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-MAR-1998 9,225.65 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,468.35 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-MAR-1998 2,468.35 2,468.35 100.000000 31374GQN0 6.2061 05/01/2036 DD 09/01/97 01-MAR-1998 -2,486.09 -2,486.09 100.000000 PD ----------- -17.74 -17.74 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,468.35 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-MAR-1998 -2,468.35 -2,468.35 100.000000 31374GON0 6.206% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-MAR-1998 2,486.09 2,486.09 100.000000 Page 21 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PDC ----------- 17.74 17.74 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,468.35 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-MAR-1998 2,468.35 2,468.35 100.000000 31374GOWO 6.206% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-MAR-1998 -2,486.09 -2,486.09 100.000000 PD ----------- -17.74 -17.74 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,468.35 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-MAR-1998 -2,468.35 -2,468.35 100.000000 31374GQWO 6.206% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-MAR-1998 2,486.09 2,486.09 100.000000 PDC ----------- 17.74 17.74 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,468.35 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-MAR-1998 2,468.35 2,468.35 100.000000 31374GQWO 6.206% 05/01/2036 DD 09/01/97 01-MAR-1998 -2,486.09 -2,486.09 100.000000 PD ----------- -17.74 -17.74 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,468.35 FNMA POOL #0313769 01-MAR-1998 2,468.35 2,468.35 100.000000 31374GQWO 6.2D68 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 01-14AR-1998 2,468.35 0.00 100.000000 PC 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -81,077.12 FNMA POOL #0313783 01-MAR-1998 81,077.12 81,077.12 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-MAR-1998 -81,659.86 -81,659.86 100.000000 PD ----------- -582.74 -582.74 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 81,077.12 FNMA POOL 90313783 01-MAR-1998 -81,077.12 -81,077.22 100.000000 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DD 1D/01/97 01-MAR-1998 81,659.86 81,659.86 100.000000 PDC ----------- 582.74 582.74 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -81,077.12 FNMA POOL #0313783 01-MAR-1998 81,077.12 81,077.12 100.00D00D 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-MAR-1998 -81,659.86 -81,659.86 100.000000 PD ----------- -582.74 -582.74 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -81,077.12 FNMA POOL #0313783 01-MAR-1998 81,077.12 81,077.12 100,000000 Page 22 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-MAR-1998 81,077.12 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,835.51 FNMA POOL 10339016 01-MAR-1998 8,835.51 8,835.51 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.207% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-MAR-1999 -8,899.02 -8,899.02 100.000000 PD ----------- -63.51 -63.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B,835.51 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-MAR-1998 -8,835.51 -8,835.51 100.000000 31375MSDG 6.207% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-MAR-1998 0,899.02 8,899.02 100.000000 PDC ----------- 63.51 63.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,835.51 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-MAR-1998 8,835.51 8,835.51 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.207% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-MAR-1998 -8,899.02 -8,899.02 100.000000 PD ----------- -63.51 -63.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,835.51 FNMA POOL /0339016 01-MAR-1998 -8,835.51 -8,835.51 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.207% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-MAR-1998 8,899.02 8,899.02 100.000000 PDC ----------- 63.51 63.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,035.51 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-MAR-1998 8,835.51 8,835.51 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.207% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-MAR-1998 -8,899.02 -8,899.02 100.000000 PD ----------- -63.51 -63.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,835.51 FNMA POOL #0339016 01-MAR-1998 -8,835.51 -8,835.51 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.207% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-MAR-1998 B,899.02 8,899.02 100.000000 PDC ----------- 63.51 63.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,835.53 FNMA POOL 10339016 01-MAR-1998 8,835.53 8,835.53 100.000000 31375MSD6 6.2071 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-MAR-1998 -8,899.04 -81899.04 100.000000 PD ----------- -63.51 -63.51 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 23 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -8,835.53 FNMA POOL 00339016 01-MAR-1998 8,835.53 0,035.53 100.000D00 31375MSD6 6.207% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-MAR-1998 8,835.53 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,89B.78 FIFTH THIRD SK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-MAR-1999 27,898.79 27,898.78 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-MAR-1998 -27,898.79 -27,898.78 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -27,898.78 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CIA 15-14AR-1998 27,898.78 27,898.70 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.2001 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-MAR-1998 27,098.78 0.00 100.000000 PC 16-HAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -152,704.72 GNMA II POOL #0008684 01-MAR-1998 152,704.72 152,704.72 100.000000 36202KUH6 7.0001 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 01-MAR-1998 -155,257.75 -155,257.75 100.000000 PD ----------- -2,553.03 -2,553.03 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -152,704.72 GNMA II POOL #0008684 01-MAR-1998 152,704.72 152,704.72 100.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 01-MAR-1998 152,704.72 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -276,712.05 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-HAR-1999 276,712.05 276,712.05 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-14AR-1998 -281,295.09 -281,295.09 100.000000 PD ----------- -4,583.04 -4,503.04 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 276,712.05 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-MAR-1998 -276,712.05 -276,712.05 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-MAR-1998 281,295.09 281,295.09 100.000000 PDC ----------- 4,593.04 4,583.04 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -276,732.80 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-MAR-1998 276,732.80 276,732.80 100.000000 36225CAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-14AR-1998 -281,316.19 -291,316.19 100.000000 PD ----------- -4,583.39 -4,583.39 1.000000000 0.00 Page 24 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE. USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -276,732.80 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-MAR-1998 276,732.80 276,732.80 100.000000 36225CAE9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-MAR-199B 276,732.80 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -144,431.44 GNMA II POOL 4080088M O1-MAR-1998 144,431.44 144,431.44 100.000000 36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-MAR-1998 -147,590.88 -147,590.88 100.000000 PD ----------- -3,159.44 -3,159.44 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -144,431,44 GNMA II POOL 4000000M O1-MAR-1998 144,431.44 144,431.44 100.000000 36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO O6101/97 01-MAR-1998 144,431.44 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 26-MAR-1998 789,173.33 799,173.33 100.000000 313397UT6 MAT 03/26/1998 26-MAR-1998 -789,173.33 -789,173.33 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 26-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC 11-MAR-1998 797,452.00 797,452.00 100.000000 72447HCB6 03/11/1998 11-MAR-1998 -797,452.00 -797,452.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 11-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN SK CONS BOB 13-MAR-1998 39,600,000.00 39,600,000.00 100.000000 3133915B6 6.490% 09/13/2000 DO 09/13/95 13-MAR-1998 -39,890,500.00 -39,890,500.00 100.000000 CAL ----------- -290,500.00 -290,500.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -39,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN BK CONS BUS 13-MAR-1998 39,600,000.00 39,600,000.00 100.000000 3133915B6 6.490% 09/13/2000 DO 09/13/95 13-MAR-1998 39,600,000.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 13-MAR-1999 0.00 0.00 1.0000OOOOD 0.00 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY Page 25 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,300.00 ADJUST CURRENT FACE TO 03-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 0.000000 9128272M3 FEB 1998 FACTOR 03-FEB-1990 -11,962.71 -11,962.71 0.000000 SW US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -11,962.71 -11,962.71 1.000000000 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,195,130.00 PRINCIPAL ADJUSTMENT TO 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 0.000000 9128272M3 FEB. 1998 FACTOR 27-FEB-1998 8,942,983.02 8,942,983.02 0.000000 SMC US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- 8,942,983.02 8,942,983.02 1.000000000 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,610.00 ADJUST CURRENT FACE TO 03-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 0.000000 9128273AS FEB 1998 FACTOR 03-FEB-1998 -8,598.98 -8,599.98 0.000000 SW US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -8,590.98 -8,598.98 1.000000000 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 249,294.83 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 16-MAR-1998 19,059.06 19,059.06 0.000000 161614AE2 5.9001 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-MAR-1998 19,059.06 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,900,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR 4 00306 16-MAR-1998 105,415.00 105,415.00 0.000000 17120QNT4 7.270% 04/13/1998 DD 04/13/95 15-MAR-1998 105,415.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO 1,000,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TA 4 00335 16-MAR-1998 31,300.00 31,300.00 0.000000 17120QPYI 6.260% 07/20/1998 DO 07/18/95 15-MAR-1998 31,300.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 473,059.99 CONTI14ORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 16-MAR-1998 15,870.34 15,870.34 0.000000 21075WDXB 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-MAR-1998 15,870.34 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 908,388.03 FHLMC GROUP 4G5-0476 16-MAR-1998 116,669.75 116,669.75 0.000000 Page 26 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 3128DD055 7.000% 02/01/2003 DD 02/01/98 01-MAR-1998 116,669.75 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 39,600,000.00 FEDERAL ROME IN BK CONS BOB 13-MAR-1998 1,285,020.00 1,285,020.00 0.000000 3133915B6 6.490% 09/13/2000 DO 09/13/95 13-MAR-1998 1,285,020.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 13-MAR-1990 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DISC 26-MAR-1998 10,826.67 10,826.67 0.000000 313397UT6 MAT 03/26/1998 26-MAR-1998 10,826.67 0.00 0.000000 IT 26-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBS 06-MAR-1998 149,750.00 149,750.00 0.000000 3134AONN8 5.990% 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/96 06-MAR-1998 249,750.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 06-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMOO 8,303.94 FNMA POOL #0065581 25-MAR-1998 2,770.27 2,770.27 0.000000 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 01-MAR-1998 2,770.27 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 02-MAR-1998 140,175.00 140,175.00 0.000000 31364CXVS 6.230% 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 01-MAR-1998 140,175.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,963.26 FNMA POOL #0238575 25-MAR-1998 2,346.93 2,346.93 0.000000 31370Q6L8 6.199% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 01-MAR-1998 2,346.93 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,789.94 FNMA POOL #0313371 25-MAR-1998 5,321.02 5,321.02 0.000000 31374GCGO 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO O1/01/97 01-MAR-1998 5,321.02 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 27 O SGUUOIUU MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 9,225.65 FNMA POOL #0313600 25-MAR-1998 5,123.25 5,123.25 0.000000 31374GKMB 6.210% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 01-MAR-1998 5,123.25 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,468.35 FNMA POOL #0313769 25-MAR-1998 1,267.95 1,267.95 0.000000 31374GQW0 6.206% 05/01/2036 DD 09/01/97 01-MAR-1998 1,267.95 0.00 0.000D00 IT 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 81,077.12 FNMA POOL #0313783 25-MAR-1998 30,714.79 30,714.79 0.000000 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 01-MAR-1998 30,714.79 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,835.53 FNMA POOL #0339016 25-MAR-1998 3,640.66 3,640.66 0.000000 31375MSD6 6.207% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 01-MAR-1998 3,640.66 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 27,898.78 FIFTH THIRD SK AUTO TR 96A CLA 16-MAR-1998 2,622.03 2,622.03 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-MAR-1998 2,622.03 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR # 00177 30-MAR-1998 96,637.80 96,637.80 0.000000 345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 30-MAR-1998 96,637.80 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 152,704.72 GNMA II POOL #0008684 20-MAR-1998 13,838.44 13,838.44 0.000000 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 01-MAR-1998 13,838.44 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 276,732.80 GNMA II POOL #0080023 20-MAR-1998 24,183.03 24,183.03 0.000000 36225CA89 7.000% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-MAR-1998 24,183.03 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 28 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 144,431.44 GNMA II POOL 1080088M 20-MAR-1998 33,018.74 33,018.74 0.000000 36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2021 DO 06/01/97 01-MAR-1998 33,018.74 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC 11-MAR-1998 2,548.00 2,548.00 0.000000 72447HCB6 03/11/1998 11-MAR-1998 2,548.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 11-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 52,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-MAR-1998 1,815,000.00 1,815,000.00 0.000000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 28-FEB-1998 1,815,000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-MAR-1998 156,250.00 156,250.00 0.000000 9128272LS 06.250% 02/2B/2002 DO 02/28/97 28-FEB-1998 156,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,800.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-MAR-1998 17,800.00 17,800.00 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-JAN-1998 17,800.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -67,970.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 27-FEB-1998 -67,970.00 -67,970.00 0.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-JAN-1998 -67,970.00 0.00 00000000 ITC 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 27-FEB-1998 67,970.00 67,970.00 0.000000 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 27-FEB-1998 67,970.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECD INT FOR FEBRUARY 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 27-FEB-1998 -67,970.00 -67,970.00 0.000000 912B273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 27-FEB-1998 -67,970.00 0.00 0.000000 CDC TO REVERSE 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 29 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-MAR-1998 - 31-MAR-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 12,390.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-MAR-1998 12,390.00 12,390.00 0.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/15/97 15-JAN-1998 12,390.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 31-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SNORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 31-MAR-1998 -1,385.17 -1,385.17 0.000000 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 31-MAR-1998 -1,395.17 0.00 0.000000 CN AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 31-MAR-1990 0.00 0.00 1.00OOOD000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 02-MAR-1998 7.78 7.78 0.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO O6/26/1997 01-MAR-1998 7.78 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-MAR-1998 582.53 582.53 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II O1-MAR-1998 582.53 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-MAR-1998 1,575.67 1,575.67 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II O1-MAR-1998 1,575.67 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 i Page 30 ._1_ FAHR COMMITTEE Meedng Date TOR BGs. g4/ga/g8 g41229 AGENDA REPORT 'ce'"i�umb `�fo"�lnbe County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Originator: Lisa Lorey, Manager, Human Resources SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO RESOLUTION 97-36 POLICIES AND PROCEDURES — DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROVISION (FAHR98-28) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached Resolution that does the following: 1. Repeals the Deferred Compensation Program in its entirety. 2. Approves of salary range increases in the amounts necessary for the General Manager to provide salary increases to those individuals in an amount exactly equal to the amounts previously paid by the Districts to those individuals through the Deferred Compensation Program. 3. Ensures that any former employees who terminated employment prior to the vesting of the deferred contribution, with the resulting forfeiture of those sums back to the Districts, would not be entitled to now receive those sums. SUMMARY To be able to make deferred compensation contributions included as compensable earnings toward the OCERS retirement benefit calculation, staff recommends rescinding the Deferred Compensation Program, which includes matching and non-matching compensation to the employee's deferred compensation account. A full report from General Counsel to the Joint Chairman and the members of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee is attached and explains the reasons why this action is necessary. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None \MJanWdlYq.EINn\]10cnroFAHRFAHRMJPRFNIflYS3B.Cx Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES See attached Report from General Counsel dated April 1, 1998. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution amending Resolution No. 97-36 2. Revised Salary Schedule 3. Report from General Counsel dated April 1, 1998. 4. Letter (Facsimile) from OCERS Attorney dated March 24, 1998 \MtlonWehlW ftf UlftmnC AHWAHR89U WAHRW26 dm RV , l� Page 2 Y RESOLUTION NO. 98- REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 95-81 (DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM) AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 97-36 (HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 95-81 RE AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP EMPLOYEES AND MANAGEMENT, PROFESSIONAL SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES, AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 96-36 AMENDING THE DISTRICTS' HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby FIND and DETERMINE: A. In conjunction with Districts' Deferred Compensation Plan, the Districts, by Resolutions Nos. 76-19, 84-132, 86-29, 87-113, and 95-81, adopted by the Boards of Directors on January 14, 1976, July 11, 1984, February 13, 1986, August 8, 1987, and July 26, 1995, respectively, have previously approved, a Deferred Compensation Program (the "Program") as a portion of their employees' comprehensive compensation package of benefits, with specific financial compensation contributions to the credit of the individual deferred compensation accounts of employees within the Executive Management, Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees of Districts, and, mn-goo w 21 1 Q B. Districts' adopted Program providing for the payment to individual employees on a matching and non-matching basis, has, at all times, been determined by Districts to be a component part of the total compensation eamable and paid to those eligible Districts' employees; and, C. At all times since the adoption of the Program, Districts have, for accounting and payroll purposes, added the matching and non-matching funds payable to the individual employee's deferred compensation account to the base salary of the employee, and thereafter, deducted the matching and non-matching funds from the individual's bi-weekly payroll; and, D. In accordance with Districts' determination, Districts have, at all times, reported the amount of contributions made by Districts, including both matching and non-matching funds ("matching and non-matching funds"), to the Orange County Employees Retirement System ("OCERS"), and have paid to OCERS the full amount of all required employer and employee retirement fund contributions, which funds have been recognized and accepted by OCERS resulting in a fully-funded status for all compensation amounts reported; and, E. A decision of the California Supreme Court in the case of Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Assn. v. Board of Retirement, has ruled that in the absence of specific statutory authorization within the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 ("CERL"), California Government Code Sections 31450 et seq., contributions by an employer member agency to an individual employee's Deferred Compensation Plan Account are not to be included in the amount of compensation upon which retirement benefits shall �Jw ° _l 2 "v be determined for retired employees; and, F. The Board of Retirement of OCERS has determined that Districts have deducted from the employee's/member's wages the amounts contributed to the employee per the Program thus can be considered remuneration paid in cash, and therefore compensation as defined in CERL. However, the Board of Retirement of OCERS has also determined that Districts' contribution to the employee's deferred compensation account is made solely because of an employee election to defer payment of said compensation, and the employee has no discretion to obtain and utilize those funds for other individual purposes, thus failing to meet the requirements of CERL, as set forth by the California Supreme Court, and, G. The Boards of Directors have determined that they do not wish to cause a financial loss to any Districts' employee, whether retired, or active, by removing or diminishing any amounts of compensation or benefits to which the retiree or employee has obtained a vested right and interest; and, H. The Boards of Directors have determined that to avoid possible legal challenges, the interests of Districts and their employees can be protected without loss to the employee or cost to Districts by terminating the existing Program and substituting therefor the payment to the employees of the same amount of money that had been paid to them pursuant to the Program by means of increasing the base salary and allowing for voluntary determination by the individual employee of the amount the employee wishes to defer, and, 2M-M cos°: 1 3 a 1. All amounts paid to current individual employees as "Districts' Matching Funds Contributions" or "Districts Non-Matching Funds Contributions" at any time since the inception of the Program to the present date are determined and reaffirmed as being a part of total compensation earnable by the individual employee, with the intention that said amounts would be included in the total compensation upon which retirement benefits for the employees would be determined. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: Section 1: Resolution No. 95-81 establishing the Amended Deferred Compensation Program for Executive Management Group Employees and Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees, is hereby repealed. Section 2: Resolution No. 97-36 re Human Resources Policies and Procedures is hereby amended by amending Policy No. C150.00 as follows: "Policy No. C150.00 is hereby amended by repealing Section 7.1". Section 3: Resolution No. 97-36 re Human Resources Policies and Procedures is hereby amended by amending Policy No. C10.00 as follows: Policy No. C10.00 is hereby amended to read: "Section 4.8 is added to read: "Section 4.8. The established salary ranges set forth on Exhibit A for Executive Management, Management, msn= e 21 4 Supervisory and Professional Employees shall be adjusted and increased by a percentage equal to the actual amounts contributed by Districts to individual employees in each of those classifications, as of the date of this Resolution, as matching and non-matching portions of deferred compensation pursuant to the adopted Deferred Compensation Program, which Program is concurrently being repealed by this Resolution. This amendment is necessary to comply with the decision of the California Supreme Court and the Board of Retirement of Orange County Retirement System to discontinue the allowing of the deferred compensation amounts contributed by employers to be reported as compensation eamable for retirement purposes. The adjusted ranges set forth on amended Exhibit "A" insure that all employees within the classification are authorized to receive pay in the same total amounts as presently provided." Section 4: Resolution No. 97-36 re Human Resources Policies and Procedures is hereby amended by substituting Exhibit "A" dated April 22, 1998 and is hereby approved. Section 5: From and after the date of adoption of this Resolution, all salary paid in accordance with the increases provided for herein to individuals in the 2=4W i 5 Executive Management Group, Management, Supervisory and Professional Employees, shall vest upon payment. All amounts described in Resolution No. 95-81, as "Districts' Matching Funds Contributions", or "Districts' Non-Matching Funds Contributions", that have been previously deposited into the respective individual's deferred compensation account of current employees of Districts, shall be deemed vested as of the date of adoption of this Resolution. Nothing in this Resolution shall be deemed to reinstate "Districts' Matching Funds Contributions" or "Districts' Non- Matching Funds Contributions" of former employees of Districts whose unvested deferred compensation account benefits contributed by Districts were forfeited on termination of employment with Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 22, 1998. sass-zoo sre° i 6 ew. Classifications By Pay Range Executive Management Pay Rang, Mlnimmn Maximum Classifications E27 12,190 12.190 General Manager E20 7.500 10,600 Assistant General Manager of Operations E79 6.834 10.874 Director of Engineering E19 6.834 10,874 Director of OWmUons B Maintenance E79 6,834 10,874 Director of General Services Aoministra9on E19 6.834 10,874 Director of Technical Services E18 6.741 10.831 Director of Finance E17 5.948 9.460 Director of lnfomiagon Tec nology E17 5.948 9.460 Director of Human Resources E9 4,328 6.495 Director of Communications Classifications By Pay Range Management Pay Range � Minimum Maximum Classifleatlorrs E16 6,090 8,953 Construction Manager E16 5.090 8,953 Engineering Manager E16 6,090 8,953 Ennimnmental Compliance 8 Monitoring Manager E16 6,090 8.953 Laboratory Manager E16 6,090 8,953 Source Control Manager E15 5,798 8,529 Controller E15 5,798 8,529 Financial Manager E15 5,795 8,529 Plant Automation Manager E14 5,517 8.120 Chief Scientist E13 5,262 7,740 Accounting Manager E13 5,262 7,740 Chief Operator E13 5,262 7,740 Safety/Emergency Response Manager E12 5,013 7,376 Maintenance Manager E12 5,013 7,376 Operations Manager E12 5,013 7,376 Contracts 8 Purchasing Manager E12 5.013 7,376 Senior Regulatory Specialist E10 4,535 6,681 Secretary to the Boards of Directors E10 4,535 6,681 Training Manager E9 4.328 6,495 Human Resources Manager Classifications By Pay Range Professional PaY Range Minimum Yadmum Llassi6caGore Ell 4,769 7,017 Engineer E9 4,328 6,495 Principal Administrative Analyst E9 4,328 6,495 Principal Engineenng Associate E9 4,328 6,495 Project Specialist E9 4,328 6,495 Regulatory Speaalat E9 4,328 6,495 Scientist Ell 4,116 6,057 Associate Engineer III E8 4,116 6.057 Principal Environmental Specialist E7 3,925 5,776 Programmer Analyst E7 3,925 5.T/6 Computer Hardware Specialist E7 3,925 5,776 Telecommunications Specialist Ell 3,735 5,441 Senior Human Resources Analyst E6 3,735 5,441 Principal laboratory 8 Researcil Analyst E6 3,735 5,441 Senior Administrative Analyst E5 3.559 5.235 Associate Engineer ll E5 3,559 5,235 Senior Accountant ES 3,559 5,235 Senior Financial Analyst E4 3,390 4,993 Safety Representative E4 3,390 4,993 Programmer E4 3,390 4,993 Senior Buyer E3 3,225 4,704 Associate Engineer E2 3,077 4,481 Human Resources Analyst E7 2,923 4,272 Accountant Et 2.923 4,272 Buyer E1 2,923 4,272 Financial Analyst E1 2,923 4,272 Management Analyst ClassHtwOom By Pay Range Supervisory Pay Range Minimum Mulmum CWssifiea8ohis E14 5.517 8.120 Engineering Supervisor E13 5,262 7.740 Environmental Management Supervisor E13 5,262 7.740 Senior Engineer E12 5.013 7.376 Compliance Supervsor E12 5.013 7.376 Laboratory Supervisor E12 5.013 7,376 Senior ScienOsl Ell 4,769 7,017 Senior Operatons Supervisor Ell 4,769 7,017 Information Technology Supervisor E9 4,328 6.754 Mainienarlce Supervisor E9 4,328 6,754 Operations Supervsor E9 4,328 6,754 Principal Accountant E9 4,328 6,754 Principal Fmncal Analyst E9 4.328 6,754 Source Contrct Supervisor E9 4,328 6,754 Supervising Construction lmpector Ell 4,116 6.057 Training Supervisor E7 3,925 5,776 Foreman E7 3.925 5,776 Maintenance Planner E7 3,925 5.776 Cen[rscs 8 Purchasing Supervisor E5 3.559 5,235 Supervising Source Control Inspector E4 3,390 4.993 Warehaae Supervisor Classifications By Pay Range Confidential Pay Range Minimum Maximum ClaeslficaUons 1027 3,443 4,266 Fxewtive Assistant It 1012 3,150 3,922 FxecuOve Assistant 1012 3,150 3,922 Human Resources Assistant AM-431-1998 15:S3 1a70nrdFP SMIDLIN 8 SMART 714 835 77n7 P.11/12 STEEFEL LEVM & WEISS ONE 1PfaAECADaaO CaNilat-3arn1 F1.00a SAN FltANCI9CO3 CA 94111.3ra4 Ucpb i 415NHHa m•P"vi®Ie 41517WZD19 March 24, 1998 By Parsimile and Mail Thomas L. Woodruff, Esq. Dane 1. Spence, Esq. Woodruff, Spradlin& Smart 701 S. Parker Street, Suite 7000 Orange, California 92868-4720 Re: A "catiop of Resolution 98-0O1 to Sanitation District Dear Mr. Woodruff and Ms. Spence: This letter responds to your request for a determination of the treatment of certain "supplemental salary" payments to Orange County Sanitation District ("District") employees under the terms of Resolution 98-001, adopted by the Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System ("OCERS"). Specifically, you ask whether the subject payments will be included as "compensation' and "compensation carnable" for purposes of calculating an employee's "final compensation" on which retirement benefits are based. Our analysis is based on the following facts that you have represented to us: 1. The "supplemental salary" payments in question are shown on the employee's pay stub as having been added to base salary and simultaneously deducted from base salary and transferred into a Deferred Compensation Trust Fund established by the District for the benefit of its employees. 2. The payments in question are never made available to the employee at the time that they are "paid' to him or her, that is, no employee may elect to take the payments in cash rather than have the money paid into the Deferred Compensation Trost Fund. 3. No other payments, from either employee or employer, ate made into the Dekrred Compensation Trust Fund. gPR-0 mfS 1-1998 15�54 4DFF DLIN 8 5MW7 714 B35 7791 P.12/12 Th— woodtufT Eaq. STEEFRI, Dania Spume. Faq. I.EVIIT ldmw 24. I998 s VTUSS part ®s 4. The 'suPP salary' payn'erds an:aaat taxable income to the employee. 74 5 Since a least Week Or Dierut has p216 over to OCFRS a-mmc repreaouft both aployer aM eugloym retirement mesibmi w tin the 'mpplerllmtal salary' isvmetas in 9uation, and OCF]LS has bum treating Ibe pW'mcmx as qualifying p_on" and 'oom fonsetion anvab(e' for retueman Icrefit purposes. 6. Sim IWTuary 6, 1998 and the llaard of Retireoavt's adoption of Resolution No. 99-001, the District has bm 'impou odim"the 'stIDpiemevrnl vtary' pay,,-. awawq OCL'll.S' dercon.4" a as to bow to pracani. As we have dirassed at latspb, VemuaS®Lay 9hmif a Asem Y. I1o4W of ResiM=((19..Zn 16 Cal. 4de 483). by m egtlico lauguaile, bas adopted a 'matmcnve defwirim' of %ompeasati m" (u set forth in Oovesnameni Code cectinn 31460) chat doer not Include employer mrrsnbwiom W defeasd contponeation phua. VVV at 494. The statuwry definition of"mmpauahon' aocmdmp W Vsdtyp, "w+gnsm that bw for the emploync'•elecenn W defer psymem of waM, (ddmvd tumpueceadm doducUomJ would be remuoentloa paid in cash' ea put of Lire eemluyee's regular wage" (nuyluNs added). VGMM con t mtes, '(Qler enamor be mid of a etmdy mmtdauiw In m employco's deterred coorpamaum plan." Similarly,armrdiult W the plan doasments;you have swprlid to tin, and a clienKad by oar discussions, one mum a=of sir District's "m icatment l salary" t e , aw employee ommt elect to rewire do 'suppleme6el celery" as addittmd wages In Iku of the payrricod ouguLed for Me Deferred L'mtpenutim Tract Rod). It to impo t W rotes m well dig coven thm gl,aWk=nIII salary may have lrru 'ahted W' Wary for peymll arccuuf&�g per, oW @to daluchod lone saIssy, licit aceaunting psocedme is w dlspoatdw of the I= Lbuectai4io8 the money as "aalery" will nit dic W its ava®om for mtircnem low purposes. SSM HwItm v. Ooard of Admird r f LEM(19n 59 GI. App. 4th 131U(otafiq tlw even wbm wages are 'nomtrtally c1comierve0 as mlmy. gm altould not . . . eon ft inquiry'). It appears that until she Supreme Csnet's clarification of applicable law in Vonnna,the subsequent Hod tier and OC11RS' Rpfolta m 98-031, the Dlsmor made employa and cmpluym comributio6s to (X17S not "aupplemenml ealarl'" paymowa. Path., sup until sew OCEPUS has irv:ludm "ssupplemmtal .slaty' is 5srmpm;xuon carmble' fm oetiriug District msplayoca wen reeivd the payments. TOTAL P.12 APR-BI-1998 15:59 LO01%31FF S�RApl_IN 8 SMPRT 414 035 7t6'T p.0l/02 Manua, wnodmff. faq. S LIEVR.I. fH^4 speptt, Say. LEvn7 Marl 74. 1998 &WEISS Page 3 �� 'fhe quesdent, their, u Low du%W OCE M tom need 'aupplemrnnl Wary' paymems for Mane wow have rcccivad It In the parr and envy r=mve n m the futuee7 The Wlnwiog Would be Our raVnm¢adatinm to do HUM of Raihemrnr' F=loyeegpho i IeBne 1.ly 1 1998: Raululiuu 9W1 win he huplementul roe or aMnd luly 1. 1999. muoWi e w October 1. E67. For Maas emph ym who had rcnred before Vmurra. they becwme vcacd m their epecif(c baetits neon mrireuem- fnnpinym retr=ammo Verona but before July 1, 1998 WM bale rebel for a tong fume on recolvhag relic- rn vedn for their'wpplemedal.ably am ,nII have fully paid for the henehit. we believe it fair s ul W priete to Irmt three cmVloyees toe awe as those retiring prc-3L wx and we wn ld rec=mmd Item be rw cILmgc in the tmemern of 'swppl®ectal salary' as additional 'compr lion'and 'compenswon earuabW fur these retirees. Pwnhgec,hired ants Ftboimv 6 19": Wmh regard to employee;whom do Dim l hires flour me date Resolution 9"l mat adopted (February 6, 1999) furw d, rw contributions shmdd be nude w/X'F M amibumble w 'wyryluneval salary" pnymenn and sael,paymeme will no longer be included in the esnple ycs' ^compensation' and 'eomPeoeatiun emumble'. gmgp >s n1iNag,y}te Tiny 1.-M: Employee he mnc htmd befoul Fdmary 6. 1998.but will our retie before holy 1, tYAS,already have made curdributitnu to OCERS bnvd it,part on thm,'sup kmmsd mlary', m has the flutrieL They will not be entitled w bays 'ahpplemeonl Salary' ne3nded in they rCdrument bunefim. Ab l0 the c0ntrthutlom w de retne eem ryprm previomiy mdc, OCFR.9 meld adegd one of the fnllnvnng approaches: 1. OCERS mould refund the wmrlbud=w both din eruploym mod nuphuyer that it rccivcd based m me emoloyae'b uppl®edal salary. 2. OCERS coNd mafo the eugloye'a 'yews wmrlbutiort amibuted to the 'ngoplememal cdary', ere icing the u04as to me employee's Mauler Cmmibet'um Accmmt. Since it is lilmly that OCERS will WK to begin rglletling increased wanibuncm from all active eupduyee w hrlp pay the War of We new Vemur'a benefin, the 'caresR rOnmhunmu made by Dinner employs could be aWlied an as to mugelc the cVwtld Inereared mdrilwtim rats. (X:Ii11S world refund tte employes a c.Uibudo.. 3. O(". S could beef Me 'msPbS'conaibuduem as 'volnnary wmribmwus' prmuaa[to Gove oxen(}tic Section 31627, thereby lnereasiug empluym bewIns beyond ihm allowed by options(1)and( ), abi e, (but lea than under the pmviaus 1 R'"'-1550 16:00 40MRFF SPtd7DLIN B SNMT 714 BM 7707 P.02i02 I Thomas Woedndf, Esq. STMRPri1 Dame space, Iisq. LF.VITT v VVRi48 Mateo 24, 199R ➢ag<4 oearmcm). Under this approach, the cmpbyro would rsvcive a b L—mtimment berrfd than rs Othmwl¢available,albeit]tat as Iasyc as was a liMpatild Pre-Vnoa . MERS would refund Nc 4nployer's wmtkutim. Rowde6 amtan din O1:FM%e0uM take, lbc olha alto tive would be for the Divrrict m actually increase a0 affocted Mirloyer_a' WaricS by The amount tout hU been prcvionmy eharaemdzed u 'uTplemcoad salary.'and maiNam comnbrWmis al dw pre Vepmor level. Under dos option, empluyces cleeft to participac in the 13efened Compauafmn Trust Food wwld receive the bend)Is they ao0eipa@d and an furrier change re deb benefit olullahom,would be required. The DiffbW slladd cormdl wilh its own raa edvuuaa before nMkWg a delernmung how b wises to proceed in 1Ma manta. We trust this reapoodt to your inquiry. Please advise or how to the Dkhict wishes to prod with MMM to active employers who will out retire before Ady 1, 1999 so flue we may advice Ile Board of Rebrelmm. Very truly y yours. r ' B�'�.�I drill AsMay,K. Ilaugwa Q cc: Raymond A. Pkming, Ad.,ramator Tin, MaoeB Robb;M. Scbachtcr. Esq. Harvey L. Lelderman, Esq. mmcmamsm TOTAL P.O2 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MeefinBD Toheds. N/A 4/2ZM AGENDA REPORT Rem Numbs I Numbs County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineer g 4 Originator: Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS REPAIRS TO THE 120- INCH OCEAN OUTFALL (JOB NO. J-39) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to solicit bids and subsequently award purchase orders for: 1. Fabrication of hardware for permanently securing the 120-inch outfall end gate at an estimated cost of$100,000; and 2. Diving services to install the hardware at an estimated cost of $100,000, for a combined amount not to exceed $200,000. SUMMARY In January 1995, high storm flows resulted in failure of the bolt holding down the 120-inch outfall end gate, and a temporary emergency repair was made using a steel tie down. A permanent closure is needed to replace this temporary steel tie down. During a recent inspection, a thrust tie, which holds the end gate structure to the outfall barrel, showed signs of crevice corrosion and requires replacement. Staff is seeking authorization to proceed so that permanent repairs are completed by September 30, 1998 in order to qualify for potential reimbursement from FEMA for repairs related to the January 1995 storms. This repair work is a maintenance item which is not required to be done as a public works contract, and therefore is not being brought before the PDC. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: CORE-131a.) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Refer to the attached Budget Information Table. lveaeVahlMe�obaMyenea Dnn aewnutim ewmamJaeex Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION , Carollo Engineers is currently in the process of preparing plans and specifications for bidding the end gate closure and thrust tie replacement. Staff proposes to award two purchase orders (one for fabrication of the monel alloy parts and the other for the diving services) in accordance with the bidding requirements specified in Resolution No. 96-87, for a total aggregate amount not to exceed $200,000. In February 1998, Carollo Engineers submitted a report on the structural condition of the 120-inch outfall and the repair of the 78-inch outfall (Job. No. J-39). The following recommendations were offered by Carollo: 1. Replace the temporary closure system at the 120-inch outfall end gate with a permanent device of suitable metal within 12 months. 2. Perform additional corrosion verification and testing on manhole covers within 10 years. Replace covers as needed in the future prior to the exceedance of the 1-inch corrosion allowance. 3. Replace the thrust restraint tie located at the 120-inch outfall end gate structure's offshore side. 4. Implement a ballast survey program to periodically monitor the condition of ballast. Monitoring should be performed every 5 years and as needed following events impacting ballast(such as severe storms or earthquakes). 5. Perform physical wave tank modeling tests to determine optimal size gradation and extent for additional ballast to reinforce the existing 120-inch outfall ballast system. 6. Re-rock the sections of the 120-inch outfall where additional reinforcing ballast is required. 7. Repair scour pad at the 120-inch outfall end gate structure. 8. Perform hydraulic testing of the 79-inch outfall. Staff is recommending proceeding with recommendations 1. and 3. at this time so that the work can be completed by September 30, 1998. Staff plans to proceed with the remaining recommendations during FY 1998-1999. mdawumpioewwa..m onn r+.00muom ewb.�,.3e.e: AMA + Page 2 ALTERNATIVES None. The mild steel hold down was installed as an interim measure to hold the gate closed. Mild steel was used during the emergency repair because corrosion- resistant monel could not be obtained and fabricated in a timely manner. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table CJH:jam WeeNEeDt1MIBIobaMBwiEe av0 Repvmlbini BoadeWtJ3B.E¢ ReNaeE: „:,BB Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR OF OCEAN OUTFALLS JOB NO. J-39 THIS REQUEST ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED BUDGET TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE INCREASE AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Investigationi Design $ 522,000 $ 499,47D $ 499,470 $ 499470 $ 475.000 95% Investigation/ Design Staff $ 253.000 $ 235.000 $ 235,000 $ 235,000 $ 177,OOO 75% Diving Services/ Repairs $ 450,000 $ 4D0,000 $ 200,000 8 200,000 $ 400,100 $ 20D,000 50% TOTAL $ 1.225,000 1 $ 1.134,470 1 $ 934.470 1 $ 200,1300 1 $ 1,134.470 $ 852,000 1 75% H%wpdW4n9Wb$Bwntmd5Ud9%budgetbi jts As