The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998-03-25 a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA March 18, 1998 NOTICE OF MEETING ,bona: (714)9622411 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS mPC Bo'x 8127 NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 Fountain 9272 -9127 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA s""ta""'" 1pstr Ems Avenue WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, 1998 - 7:30 P.M. Founuen Valle,,CA 9270B7018 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member Agenaae The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will D"Be be held at the above location, time and date. Arabs. arms Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Huntington Beach Irvine B S- etary Le Habra La Palma Las Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Placentae Senor And Beal Beach scarce Tustin STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 25, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Villa Park Yorba Linda OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND County of Orange TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 1, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. sanitary Districts PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, April 2, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Caere Mesa Gorden Grove Midway City FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 8, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. water Districts o-vine Parch STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, Apnl 22, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment since 1954 JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Joint Board Meeting April April22, 1998 May May 27, 1998 June June 24, 1998 July July 1, 1998 July July 29, 1998 August August 26, 1998 September September 23, 1998 October October 28, 1998 November November 18, 1998 December December 16, 1998 January January 27, 1999 February February 24, 1999 March March 24, 1999 April April28, 1999 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 25, 1998 NICTS OF p99y �1 2 � c�a a vwv THE EN PQd ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 02/25/98 Page 2 of 9 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on February 25, 1998, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT X Pat McGuigan, Chair Thomas E. Lutz NO. 1 1 XX Arthur P e omzmM , JoanneC X Thomas R. Sakarelli Jim Pori X I Todd Spitzer I I William G.Steiner DISTRICT X Norman Z. Eckenrode Chair Michael L.Maertzweiler NO. 2 X Mark A Murphy,Chair pro tem Joanne Coontz A Steve Anderson John Holmbe Don Bankhead X Jan Flory X Bruce A.Broadwater Mark Le es X John Collins Laurann Cook X Barry Denes Richard A.Freschi X Bumie Dunlap Glenn Parker X John Gullbrson Gene Wisner X Pat MCGui an Thomas E. Linz X ToddI William G. Steiner X I Bob Zemel Tom Dal DISTRICT X Margie L Rice Chair James V. Evans NO.3 X Eva Miner-Bradford,Chair pro tern Paul F.Walker A Steve Anderson John Holmberg Don Bankhead X Jan Flory X George Brown Gwen Forsythe X John Collins Laurann Cook A Brian Donahue Harry M. Dotson X Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker X Mary Ann Jones Tom Carroll X Mark Le es Bruce A. Broadwaler X Patsy Marshall I Jack Mauller X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Todd Spitzer William G.Steiner X Dave Sullivan Tom Hannan X Charles E.Sylvia I Ronald Bates X Bob Zemel I Tom Dal DISTRICT X Jan Deba Chair John E. Noyes NO.5 X I John E. Noyes, Chair pro tem Jan Deba X I William G.Steiner I I Todd Spitzer DISTRICT X I James M. erryman, Chair 1 Arthur Penv NO. 6 X William G.Steiner Chair pro tem Todd Spitzer X Jan Debe Tom W.Thomson Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 02/25/98 Page 3 of 9 ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT X Thomas R. Saaarelll Chair Jim Potts NO. 7 X Christina Shea Chair protam Barry Hammond X Jan Debay John E. Noyes X James M. Fe an Arthur Perry X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz X William G. Steiner Todd Spitzer DISTRICT I X I ShirleyDettloff,Chair Tom Hannan NO.11 X Dave Sullivan, Chair pro tam Tom Hannan X I Todd S ilzer I William G.Steiner DISTRICT X Burnie Dunlap, Chair Glenn Parker NO. 13 X John Gu"I'mn Gene Wisner X Mark A. Mu h Joanne Coontz X William G.Steiner 11 Todd Spitzer X I Bob Zemel 11 Tom Dal DISTRICT X Christina Shea Chair Sony Hammond NO. 14 X Thomas R. Sallarelli Chair pro tam im Potts X Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz X I William G. Steiner I Todd Spitzer X I Peer A. Swan I Darryl Miller STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Chris Dahl; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Bob Ooten; Mike Petennan; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy Wheatley OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Bill Knopf; Jerome Greubel; Bob Lockhart; Art Perry DISTRICTS 3. 7 & 14 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Aoencv District Active Director Alternate Director Irvine 7& 14 Christina Shea' Barry Hammond La Palma 3 Eva Miner Bradford Paul F. Walker Minutes for Joint Board Meeting • 02/25/98 Page 4 of 9 PUBLIC COMMENTS Bob Lockhart, President of Revenue Enhancement Group, spoke to the Directors regarding the ordinances recently adopted by the Districts limiting rebates and refunds of assessment charges that go back only one year. Mr. Lockhart stated that his company has been working on refunds at the Districts for the past two years and is responsible for 75% of the $15 million in refunds issued by the Districts during that period. Up until now, the State of California's Statute of Limitations has allowed his company to go back four years from the current tax year to receive refunds. He felt limiting refunds to one year is unfair to property owners who may have been overcharged for many years. Mr. Lockhart requested a reconsideration of the changes to the ordinances, and indicated that his company was prepared to initiate litigation ff a mutual resolution was not reached. REPORT OF JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chairman congratulated Director Shiriey Dettloff on her recent appointment to the State of California Coastal Commission. He also reported that Districts' staff would be making a presentation on inflow and infiltration at the March 2, 1998 City Engineers'Association meeting; and the Council of Governments would be meeting at the Districts'offices on March 19th. On March 12t° a Water Issues Forum will be held at the Irvine Marriott to discuss the future of Orange County's water supply. Directors interested in attending were asked to contact Jean Tappan, Assistant to the General Manager. Joint Chairman Collins also reported that Districts' staff would be making a presentation on March 26'"to the city managers on cooperative projects. Directors were asked to encourage their city engineers to attend the meeting which is to be held at the Districts. REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that a joint hearing with the Environmental Protection Agency and Regional Water Quality Control Board would be held on March 6" at Newport Beach City Hall. He then recognized Bob Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance, who briefed the Directors on the impact to the Districts with the latest series of El Nino storms. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel reported that a lawsuit had been riled by the Districts against Penn Octane Corporation, at al., for failure to deliver a compressor or issue a refund of all monies paid by the Districts in conjunction with the Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Station, Specification No. E-266. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 02/25/98 Page 5 of 9 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair requested that the following resolutions be adopted expressing appreciation to outgoing Directors Chris Norby, Mark Schwing and Hank Wedaa for their contribution and dedication to public service upon their retirement from the Boards: Resolution No. Director City/Agency 98-04 Chris Norby Fullerton 98-05 Mark Schwing Yorba Linda 98-06 Hank Wedaa Yorba Linda APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts) There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 28, 1998, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS (All Districts) MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District daims set forth on exhibits 'A"and 'B', attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 12/10/97 1?12M97 Joint Operating Fund $1,711,503.48 $1,133.934.24 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 349,086.66 1,551,949.71 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 23.932.49 5,277.22 District No. 1 0.00 4,043.62 District No. 2 7,661.72 8,274.62 District No. 3 525.90 5,346.51 District No. 5 11,245.91 1.190.34 District No. 6 17.01 0.00 District No. 7 0.00 0.00 District No. 11 0.00 0.00 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 22.103.973.15 $2 710 016.28 Directors Mark Leyes and Todd Spitzer abstained. CONSENT CALENDAR ALL DISTRICTS 9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and authorize award of a purchase order contract for Uniform and Janitorial Articles Rental Service, Specification No. R-D45, to Mission Linen and Uniform Service for providing rental uniforms and various janitorial articles rental service, at an estimated annual amount of$108,366.44. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting O2/25/98 Page 6 of 9 10. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Personal Injury and Negligence, Laraine Pipoly v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 790053, relative to alleged damages involving a Districts' employee; and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 2 11. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Adopt Resolution No. 98-02-2, approving Utility Agreement No. 12257 with the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) providing for the reimbursement by Caltrans for all costs to provide design management, construction management, inspection and associated costs for modifications to Newhope-Placentia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-3A to accommodate the 1.5 Freeway widening for a total estimated amount of$90,000. DISTRICT 3 12. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve reimbursement agreement with Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) authorizing District No. 3 to deposit the sum of$109,OD0 with OCFCD for the cost of construction and administration of construction and inspection for modifications to Magnolia Relief Sewer in Western Avenue at the Fullerton Creek Channel Crossing, Contract No. 3-9-1. 13. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize execution of Quitclaim Deed of La Habra purchase line W to the current property developer, Shea Homes of Southern California, Inc. Directors Mark Leyes and Todd Spitzer abstained. DISTRICT 7 14. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Accept Grant of Easement from Irvine Community Development Company for proposed relocated sewer, and authorize the General Manager to execute Quitclaim Deed for existing sewer easement to Irvine Community Development Company. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 16.a. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of Steering Committee, re the February 25, 1998 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 28, 1998 to be filed. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 02/25/98 Page 7 of 9 17.a. DRAFT OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE -MINUTES : A verbal report was presented by the Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the February 4, 1998 meeting The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 4, 1998 to be filed. 17.c. Item removed. 17.d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Approve project funding increase of $57,000 for the Primary effluent Filtration Test Program to cover additional project overhead caused by a change in accounting procedures. 17.e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED:Approve out-of-country travel by Jane Tran to attend the Printed Circuit Board Wastewater Technologies Conference being held in Taiwan to present her technical paper, for one week in March 1998; and, all travel, lodging, registration and per diem costs to be paid by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 18.a. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by the Chair of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee, re the February 5, 1998 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 5, 1998 to be filed. 18.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for plans and specifications for the design of Automation of Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-60, and Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.60,for an amount not to exceed $795,101; and increase the project budget amount from$5,638,000 to$10,891,000 due to an expanded project scope. 18.d MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; authorize award of a contract for Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57,to First Fire Systems, Inc., for a total amount of$354,341.49; authorize an increase in the budget amount from $507,000 to $560,000; and receive and file letters dated November 20, 1997 and December 9, 1997 from West Star Construction submitting and subsequently withdrawing their bid protest regarding bidder qualifications. 18.e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for Orange County Redamation Project with the Orange County Water District, authorizing both general managers to expend funds subject to speed terms and conditions. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 02/25/98 Page 8 of 9 19.a. DRAFT FINANCE ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES : A verbal report was presented by the Chair of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes, re the February 11, 1998 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 11, 1998 to be filed. 19.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 1998. 19.d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period October 1 through December 31, 1997 19.e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Renew Boiler& Machinery Insurance for the Districts for the period March 1, 1998 to March 1, 1999, with Kemper insurance Companies, in an amount not to exceed $71,286. 19J. Item deleted. 19.g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize award of an agreement for the substitution of Enterprise Technologies to replace J. D. Edwards for the implementation portion of the Financial Information System (Specification No. P-172), for an amount not to exceed$336,655.00. Director Mark Murphy abstained. 19.h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: To continue this matter until March 25, 1998 to adopt Resolution No. 98-03, approving Amended Deferred Compensation Program for Executive Management Group Employees and Management, Supervisory, Professional and Confidential Employees, providing for incentive compensation heretofore called "employer matching' and "employer non-matching contributions"to be designated as supplemental salary as a part of the total remuneration paid to the employee. 19.i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file 1997-98 Mid-Year Financial and operational Report for period ending December 31, 1997. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 02/25/98 Page 9 of 9 DISTRICT 5 20, MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the plans and specifications; authorize award of a contract for Relocation of lido pump Station, Contract No. 541-1, to Advanco Constructors, Inc. for an amount not to exceed$2,196,376; authorize an increase in the budget allocation from $1,395,000 to$2,636,381; and authorize execution of an Easement Agreement with the City of Newport Beach, increasing the previously approved purchase price of$56,300 to$78,885. DISTRICT 7 21. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED AMENDED MOTION: Motion amended to: a) Receive and file letter from the Greubel Company dated January 8, 1998, and b) approve a finding that the proposed residential development is a commercial use for the purpose of assessing capital facilities connection fees based upon the provisions of the established ordinance. ALL DISTRICTS 22.a. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (54956.9) (All Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at 8:50 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 to consider those items listed on the agenda as Item No. 22(a) (2). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item No. 22(a)(2). 22.b. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 9:09 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:09 p.m. Secretary of Oe and f Directors of W County Sanita n Dis s Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 Hiwpola�gendall M Jand SwW Mlnameasgs.dw County Sanitation Distacts Of Orange County ' Claims Paid 12110197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8224 Bio Gm Division $32,792.98 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 8225 Carus Corporation $37.437.04 Fiber Optic Cable 6226 Campo Engineers $77,00&94 Engineering Services J-33-2 8227 Chapman Counseling $56,025.00 Employee Training 8228 Delta Dental $34.945.86 Dental Insurance Plan 8229 Duke Energy Trading It Marketing $99.947.67 Natural Gas 8230 Edison Co. $53,765.04 Power 8231 Harbour Engineering Group $26.952.71 Mechanical Parts 8232 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. $89,969.88 FeMC Chloride MO 9.27-95 8233 Nat West Markets $67.984.49 COP Interest Draw Fees 8234 National Plant Services,Inc. $76,073.30 Vacuum Track Services 8235 Pacific Investment Management $118.283.00 Investment Ml Service Res.95-75 8236 Pacificare of Ca $61,860.62 Medical Insurance Premium 8237 Palnewebber Incorporated $60,186.57 COP Remarketing Agreement 8238 Pima Gm Systems Inc $101,923.51 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 8239 Poypure,Inc.Wor Poydyne $50,501.417 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 8240 Power Generation Consulting $55,984.00 Generator Maintenance 8241 R W Beck $40,563.90 Professional Services MO 7.30.97 r4 8242 Science Applications Ing.,Co. $80,072.45 Ocean MonBoang MO 6.&94 11243 Sonic Systems,Inc. $43.078.45 Computer Paris µ 82" Sverdrup CMI,Inc. $56,694.00 Construction 74-1 fa.. 8245 Tula Ranch/Magan Fares $43,305.35 Residuals Removal ^ 8246 American Telephone&Telegraph-Megacom $2.951.88 Long Distance Telephone Services 8247 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $9.82 Long Distance Telephone Services $248 Amerman Telephone&Telegraph-Megacem $843.30 Lang Distance Telephone Services 8249 A-Plus Systems $669.60 Notices&Ads 8250 Abrasive Engineering Tool&Equipment $293.72 Hardware 8251 Air Products and Chemicals,In $22,500.00 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen.Syst.MO 8-8-89 8252 American Management Arsoeatton $125.00 Seminar Registration 8253 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $180.00 Service Agreement 8254 Apploone Employment Service $4,053.00 Temporary Employment Services 8255 Applied Industrial Technology $4.67 Pump Pads 8256 Arizona Instrument $1,267.25 Instrument Supplies 8257 Armor-Vac $960.00 Vacuum Truck Services 8258 Ads Disposal Service,Ino $310.40 Toxic Waste Removal 8259 Asbury Environmental Services $3500 Waste Oil Removal 8280 Awards&Trophies By Bea $22.63 Plaques 8261 ADS Enviran mmowl Services,Inc. $18.400.00 Professional Services 8262 ATM AA Inc $1.011.00 Lab Services 8263 Banana Blueprint, Inc. $16,461.64 Panting MO 11-7-94 8264 Bank of Amerce $301A7 Banking Services 8265 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $375.00 Telephone Installation 8266 Basler Electric Company $474.45 Electric Pads 8267 Battelle $9,000.0D Professional Services MO 3.27-95 8268 Battery Specialist; $387.98 Batteries 8269 Beacon Bay Enterprises $57.70 Truck Wash Tickets 8270 Black&Veatch $20.980.00 Engineering Services P146 8271 Brown And Caldwell $2.662.21 Engineering Services Res 93-101 8272 Bush&Associates Inc. $1,048.00 Surveying Services NO 6.2597 County Sanitation Dlstrids Of Orange County Claims Paid 12/10/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8273 C.P.I. $767.44 Lab Supplies 8274 California Automatic Gate $187.24 Service Agreement 8275 California Industrial Fabric $716.31 Weight Bags 8276 Calolymplc Safety $7,774.81 Safety Supplies 8277 Career Track Seminars MS2 $596.00 Seminar Registration 8278 Carl Warren 8 Co. $2,208.20 Insurance Claims Administrator 8279 Center for Demographic Research 525.00 Dwelling Unit Count 8280 Centrepoirde Commercial Interfors $2,447.35 Once Furniture 8281 Copp Corp $948.20 IERP Supplies 8282 Cednet $20.00 Computer Services 8283 Certified Appliance Co $57.70 Mlrcowave Repair 8284 Chad"P.Crowley Co. $2.446.94 Instrument Pads 8285 City of Seal Beech $159.84 Water Use 8286 Coast Fire Equipment $1,292.18 Service Agreement 8287 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. $615.78 Office Supplies 8288 Communications Performance Group $10.533.80 Professional Services 8289 Compressor Components Of California $4,776.00 Compressor Repair 8290 CompuMasler $395.00 Seminar Registration M 8291 Comes GM Pads $258.76 Truck Paris N 8292 Consolidated Reprographics $1.269.08 Printing Services � 8293 Consumes Pipe 8 Supply Co E29.23 Plumbing Supplies v 8294 Continental-McLaughlin $715.33 Tools ^ 8295 Contractors Equipment Co $1.465.47 Crane Rental > $296 Converse Consultants $4.682.70 Consulting Services MO 8-11.93 ry 8297 Cooper Cameron Corporation $5.172.00 Engine Pads 8298 Copeloo Capital,Inc. $1432.00 Colar Cooler Lease 8299 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $8.40 Truck Parts 8300 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc 5425.34 Mechanical Supplies 8301 County of Orange-Auditor Controller $53,00 Permits 8302 CASA $175.00 Conference Registration 8303 Consoliated Elecldcal Distributors 5679.05 Electric Pads 8304 CEPA Company $60.00 Recertification 8305 Creative Power Management 54,200.00 Professional Services 8306 CS Company $2,664.56 Plumbing Supplies 8307 CalBomla Society of Municipal Finance Officers $80.D0 Luncheon Meeting 8308 David F.Libert,Ph.D. $875.00 Management Training 8309 Del Mar Analytical $190.00 Biosolids Analysis 8310 Dell Direct Sales L.P. $8,516.88 Computers 8311 DeZurck $7,431.59 Valves 8312 Diamond H Rocognition $728.88 Service Awards 8313 Dover Elevator Company $1.065.00 Elevator Maintenance 8314 DGA Consultants,Inc. $11,701.52 Surveying Services MO8-10-94 8315 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. $4.455.00 Medical Screening 8316 Edwards High Vacuum Informational 580.82 Lab Supplies 8317 Elsevier Advanced Technologies $163.78 Publication 8318 Executive Excellence $400.00 Membership , 8319 Express Paper 8 Graphics Store $129.21 Paper $320 Fibemon $542.76 Fiber Optic Cable $321 Fisher Scientific $1.311.53 Lab Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 12/10197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description . 8322 Fluid Components Intl. $1,993.69 Electric Pads 8323 Fountain Valley Camara $130.40 Photo Supplies 8324 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash $414.00 Truck Wash Tickets 8325 Franklin Quest $167.55 Office Supplies 8326 Fry's Electronic $990.96 Electronic&Computer Supplies 8327 City of Fullerton $255.75 Water Use 8328 Gonad Lumber Company $122.58 Lumber 7 Hardware 0329 The Gas Company $130.18 Natural Gas 8330 General Eledde Supply Company $136.38 Electric Pads 8331 GTE California $1,209.17 Telephone Services 8332 Gledich-Mitchell,Inc. $9,434.26 Pump Parts 8333 Graloplast $190.00 Instrument Supplies 8334 WW Grainger Inc $1.486.29 Compressor Parts 8335 Great American Printing Cc $938.66 Printing Services 83M GLl International $750.15 Electric Parts 8337 GLI International $1.795.31 Electric Pads 8338 GST.Inc./Micro Clry $9,508.91 O(8ce Supplies 8339 GTE $18,224.52 Telephone Services 8340 Harold Primrose Ice $128.00 Ice For Samples 8341 Harrington Industrial Plastics $56.72 Plumbing Supplies x 8342 Hatch&Kirk Inc. $3,626.68 Truck Parts c 8343 Hawali Water Environment Assoc. $90.00 Conference Registration 8344 Hewlett-Packard $345.96 Service Agreement a 8345 Hoerbiger Service Inc, $481.64 Compressor Pads I 8346 Hoffman Air&Filtration $267.71 Mechanical Supplies 8347 Holmes&Narver Inc $601.64 Engineering Services 8348 Home Depot $379.59 Small Hanhaare 8349 Nub Auto Supply $738.33 Truck Pods 8350 City of Huntington Beach $13,418.11 Water Use 5351 Hunts Final Phase $6,300.00 Contraction Sand.. 8352 HI Standard Aulomotwe $505.81 Truck Pads 8353 Imaging Plus,Inc. $6,216.23 Office Supplies 8354 Industrial Filter Manufacturer $3,078.16 Filters 0355 Industrial Hearing&Pulmonary $150.00 Audlometric&Pulmonary Testing Of Employees 8356 Interstate Battery Systems $3,272.47 Batteries 9357 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $3.54 Water Use 8358 IPCO Safety-Ca $451.52 Safety Supplies 8359 J.D.Edwards World Solutions $24,048 65 Software License Fees MO 7-24-96 8360 J.P.Nissen Cc $61,36 Office Supplies 8361 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $1,400.00 Construction Services $362 Jaye Catering $877.93 Director's Meeting Expense 6363 Johnstone Supply $779,28 Electric Paris 6364 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan $22.328.49 Medical Insurance Premium 8365 Klelnf rlder,Inc. $1,175.00 Geotechnical Consulting Services $365 Knowledge Point $1.782.76 Software 9367 Knox Industrial Supplies $2,069.34 Tools 8368 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company $1,693.31 Cellular Telephone Service 8369 Lord Fleming Architects,Inc. $3,034.87 Architectural Services 8370 Maintenance Products,Inc. $6,770.45 Mechanical Supplies County Sanitation Dialects Of Orange County Claims Paid 12/10f97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8371 Manley's Boiler Repair Company $833.28 Boiler Repair 8372 Mar Vac Electronics $168.79 Instrument Supplies 8373 Mission UnBgnn Service $3.805.46 Uniform Rentals $374 Mobile Modular Management Corp $344,80 Office Tudor Lease 8375 MotoPhoto $13.16 Photographic Services 8376 MPS Photographic Services, Inc. $31.80 Photographic Servims 8377 National Microcomp Services $1.685.00 Maintenance Agreement 5378 Orange County Employment Management $120.00 Membership 8379 Orange County Wholesale Electric $1,834.14 Instrument Supplies 8380 ONe"Co. $1,656.85 Pump Parts 8381 Oxygen Servko Company $926.83 Specialty Gases 8382 Ol Analytical $207.35 Lab Supplies 830 Pacific Ben $1.247.58 Telephone Services 8384 Pacific Mechanical Supply $8,748.91 Plumbing Supplies 8385 Pacific Paris and Controls,Inc $534.41 Instrument Supplies 8386 Pacific Publishers $252.28 Publications 8387 Padre Janitorial Supplies $500.71 Janitorial Supplies 8388 Pagenel $708.88 Rental Equipment 8389 Parker Hamlin Corporation $429.35 Lubricator % 8390 Peak Technologies $382.50 Office Supplies w 8391 The Perkin Eimer Corp. $800.00 Computer Parts c 8392 Pennassal $1,368.54 Luba Oil n 8393 Power Design $1.982.60 Electrical Repair > 8394 Presidium Inc $2.083.33 Workers Comp Claims Administration. r 8395 Pryor Resources,Inc. $149.00 Seminar Registration 830 Pulsareeder,Inc. $416.90 Pump Paris 8397 Rabin $1.024.00 Search Light 8398 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2,160.05 Trash Removal 8399 Reaitima Systems Corporation $500.00 Consulting Services 8400 Red Wing Shoes $122.40 Reimbursable Safey Shoes 6401 Remedy $8.628.30 Temporary Employment Servlees 8402 Rutan It Tucker Attorneys Al Law $2.406.02 Legal Services 8403 Ryan Herco Products Corp. $444.44 Metal 8404 RPM Electric Motors $4.202.25 Electric Motor Parts 8405 Schwing America, Inc. $156.53 Pump Parts 8406 Scborek&Son Flavors,Inc. $921.98 Refund Credit Balance 8407 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $1,557.98 Specialty Gases 8408 Scott,Reilly&Whitehead $51.70 Legal Services-Personnel Issues 8409 Sea-BIN Eledronice,Inc. $3,774.94 Lab Repairs 8410 Se8-Inaurance Plans $583.37 User Funding Assessment-Workers Comp 8411 Sequels Tree Service $2,925.00 Groundskeeping 8412 Smith-Emery Company $21.192.50 Soil Testing M07-13-94 8413 Society for Human Resource Management $160.00 Membership 8414 Sail&Plant Laboratory, Ina $333.00 Soil Testing 5415 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $157.20 Permit Fees 8416 South Coast Water $135.00 Lab Supplies 8417 Southern California Marine Institute $965.00 Renal Equipment 8418 Sparkletts $2,168.99 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 8419 Spent $29.10 Telephone Services County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County - Clalms Paid 12A0197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8420 Starting Art $20.33 Art Supplies 0421 Summit Steel $2,435.62 Metal 5422 Sunset Ford $323.56 Truck Pads 8423 Sunset Industrial Pads $78.72 Mechanical Pads 8424 Supelop Inc $646.65 Lab Supplies 8425 Sy Nielson Service,Inc. $720.00 Equipment Maintenance 8426 The Register $3,479.00 Notices&Ads 5427 Thompson Industrial Supply.Inc. $991.06 Mechanical Pads 6428 Tony Germans Electric $680.00 Equipment Repair 8429 Amofund FlnanciaBTop Het Pro $271.96 Director's Meeting Expense 8430 Tomell B Cotten $745.50 Legal Services 8431 Trawram r Inc., $765.84 Calibration 8432 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $555.02 Truck Parts 5433 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $362.00 Lab Services 8434 Tustin Dodge $101.09 Truck Pads 8435 United Financial Casualty Co. $785.98 Clain Settlement 8436 United Parcel Service $26.89 Parcel Services 5437 Vako Instruments Co.Inc. $496.90 Lab Supplies $438 Valley Cities Supply Company $442.24 Plumbing Supplies e 8439 Veme's Plumbing $40.00 Plumbing Services w 8440 Vertex Business Systems $2.210.00 Office Furniture 8441 Vision Service Plan-JCA) $7.732.20 Vision Service Plan Premium rµ* 8442 VWR Scientific Products $795.38 Lab Supplies 9 5443 The Wackenhut Corporation $9.139.99 Contract Service-Security Guards 8444 Water Education Foundation $10.66 Map $446 Weather and Wnd Instrument Cc $475.03 Wind Socks 8446 Wescc Distribution Inc. $13.71 Instrument Supplies 5447 Western States Chemlcel lna $24.295.18 Caustic Soda M08-23-95 8448 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $1.940.00 Professional Services 8449 Xerox Corporation $2.574.77 Copier Leases 8450 Daniel R.Cardona $2.392.21 Employee Computer Loan Program 8451 Mark A.Esquer $1,730.14 Conference Expense Relmb. 8452 Michelle R.Hetherington $172.32 Seminar Expense Relmb. 8453 Patty A.Sleeves $110.50 Training Expense Relmb. 8454 Edward M.Tones $246.11 Training Expense Relmb. 5455 Yu-LI Tsai $755.05 Conference Expense Relmb. 8456 Antonio S.Valemuela 3600.08 Conference Expense Solmb. 8457 Nancy J.Wheatley $593.55 Seminar Expense Relmb. 8458 YTG International Inc,&Darrell Ennis $1.793.06 Employee Computer Loan Program 8459 County of Orange $1,035.00 Adminisiretive Fees 8460 County Sanitation District of OC $1,406.27 Petty Cash Remb. 8461 Donald C.Harchar $2,221.70 Employee Computer Loan Program 8462 Nylon Computer&Dean yokoyama $1,957.93 Employee Computer Loan Program 8463 Charles E.Reed $1,375.10 Employee Computer Loan Program SAM Labware Inc. $39,750.00 Consulting Services M02-26-97 8465 Metre Health AM Financial $117.903.74 Metre Premium 8466 Associated Ready Mixed Concrete $563.26 Concrete 8467 Chrome Crankshaft Co. $460.00 Mechanical Pads 5468 GTE California $952.29 Telephone Services County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 121IW97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8469 Kemfmn Pacific,Inc. $2.291.94 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 8470 Mar Vac Electronics 563.07 Instrument Supplies 8471 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $72.59 Tools 8472 Motile Modular Management Corp $256.60 OI6ce Trailer Lease $473 Mine Safety Appliances Company $1.758.35 Instrument Supplies 8474 New Horizons Computer Learning $1.000,00 OnSffe Training 8475 Norcal Controls Incorporated $935.28 Instrument Paris 8476 Polypure,Inc.Wor Polydyns $1,124.39 Catlonlc Polymer MO 3-11-92 $477 Valley CBies Supply Company $1.594.27 Plumbing Supplies 8478 Xerox Corporation $1,224.68 Copier Leases 6479 Mark A.Esquer $256.85 Meeting Expense Reimb. 8480 Michael J.MCCusker $263.94 Meeting Expense Reimb. 8481 ACI Computer 8 Stave Kozak $1,600.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 8482 Compapross 8 Roy Handy $1,727.10 Employee Computer Loan Program U83 County Sanitation Districts of OC $19,087.84 Workers Camp Reimb. "But Dean M.Fisher $2,795.45 Employee Computer Loan Program 8485 Xerox Corporation $88.98 Copier Leases Total Claims Pak 12/10/97 $2,103.973.15 S H V Y A > Summary Amount m Obidot No.2 $7.661.72 District No.3 $525.90 District No.5 $11,245.91 District No.6 $17.01 CORF $349.086.66 Set Insurance Funds $23,932.49 Joint Operations $1,711,503.46 $2,103,973.15 p County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County ' Claims Paid 1224197 ' Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8504 Advanco Constructors Inc. $260.849.70 Construction J-3a1,P2-35-5 8505 Dena Dental $38,275.82 Dental Insurance Plan 8506 J.D.Edwards World Solutions $67.375.00 Software License Fees MO 7.24-96 8507 Kemlren Pacific,Inc. $92.410.75 FenM Chloride MO 9-27-95 8508 Margate Construction Inc. $756,230.53 Construction PI-36-2 8509 Nlckey Petroleum Co Inc. $42,395.38 Lubricants/Diesel Fuel 8510 Orange County Water District $45.369.60 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 8511 Pima Gro Systems Inc $100,402.02 Residuals Removal NO 3.29.95 8512 Power Systems Tasting Company $51,000.00 Diesel Engines MO 2-28-96 8513 Science Applications lydl.,Co. $107,461.74 Ocean Monftoring NO 6$94 8514 Sonic Systems,Inc. $43,078.45 Computer Parts $515 Southern California Edison $46,836.07 Power ame Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $287,736.53 Construction P2-35-3,PI-38-5,P2416,P2-55 8517 Thomas Bros.Maps $38,089.63 Printing 8518 Tule Ranch/Magan Forms $42.309.88 Residuals Removal 8519 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $78,121.01 Hydrogen Pem%Me Specification No,C-0N 8520 American Telephone 8 Telegraph $20.78 Long Distance Telephone Services 8521 American Telephone 8 Telegraph $1.93 Long Distance Telephone Services 8522 A-Plus Systems $450.75 Notices&Ads y0523 Action Awnings Inc. $2,400.00 Awnings r. 8524 Al,Condtloning Specialties $82.64 Aerosol Adhesive c 8526 At,Products and Chemicals, Inc. $13.02 Lob Supplies n 8526 Allied Pecking 8 Rubber Inc. $34.73 Mechanical Supplies to 8527 Almalmn Electronics $389.64 Usage Fae Refund �. 8528 American Digital Technologies $542.61 OnSfte Tramlag 8529 American Management Association $8.400.00 Seminar Registrations 8530 Anaheim Motel $390.25 Usage Fee Refund 8531 Analysts,Inc. $825.00 Testing Kits 8532 Andrews Glass Co. $1,522.30 Lob Supplies 8533 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $610.00 Service Agreement 0634 Appleone Employment Service $945.30 Temporary Employment Services 8535 Aquatic Sioassay And Consulting $235.00 Lab Supplies 8536 Arizona Instrument $421.36 Instrument Supplies 6537 Jeffrey L.Armstrong $1,055.45 Meeting Expense Relmb. 8538 Ad's Disposal Service,Inc. $31&40 Toxic Waste Removal 8539 Asbury Environmental Services $35,00 Waste Oil Removal 8540 Authur D.Guy 111 $1.910.00 Professional Services 8541 Assoc of Metro.Sewerage Agencies $950.00 Conference Registration 8542 ASR Analysis $500,00 Lab Services 8543 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $462,85 Telephone Installation 8644 Basler Electric Company $4,530.07 Electric Parts 8545 Battery Specialties $206.36 Batteries 8546 Barn Consuting $2,441.56 Mechanical Supplies 0547 Bob Delivery $107.00 Freight 8548 Bon Tech $123.50 Freight 8549 Budget Janftodal,lnc. $3,085.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-99 8550 Bush 6 Associates Inc. $520.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 8551 BNI Building News $124.78 Publication 8552 Cal-Tax $96.00 Subscription County Sanblion Dihicts Of orange County Claims Paid 12/24/97 Check No. Vendar Amount Description 8553 California Automatic Gala $87.16 Service Agreement 8554 Callan Associates,Inc. $3,550.00 Investment Advisor 8555 Caltrol,Inc. $1.018.85 Hardware 8556 Cornell Corp. $2.387.50 Service Agreement 8557 Canus Corporation $150.89 Fiber Optic Cable 8558 Capitol Enquiry,Inc. $22.95 Publication 8559 Carollo Engineers $6,786.39 Engineering Services J-39 8560 Chapman Counseling $640.00 Employee Training 8561 Connell GM Parts $51.82 Track Pads 8562 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $3,762.21 Electric Parts 8Wl CmAlrantal-McLaughlin $4.88 Tools 8564 Converse Consultants 5648.00 Consulting Services MO 8-11-93 8565 Cooper Cameron Corporation $4.360.02 Engine Paris 8556 Coral Magazine $39.95 Technical Journal 8567 Corporate Express $437.35 Office Supplies 11ma County of Orange $525.00 Permit Fees 8569 County of Orange $2.955.00 Administrative Fees 8570 County of Orange 51,560.00 Administrative Fees 8571 CASA $525.00 Conference Registration 8572 CCI Technologies $1.696.00 Cable Installation 8573 CCI Technologies $5,294.00 Cable Installation v 8574 CMS,Inc. $2.172.02 Professional Services n 8575 CPEE $795.00 Training Registration to 8576 CPI-The Alternative Supplier $695.00 Lab Supplies r; 8577 CS Company $1,486.91 Plumbing Supplies 8578 D 8 E Supply $426.63 Plumbing Supplies 8579 Daniels Tire Service $583.14 Truck Tires 8580 Datavau8 $204.00 Ofsae Bark-Up Tape Storage 8581 David E.Libed,Ph.D. $1,500.00 Management Training 8582 Day-Timers,Inc, $32.85 Once Supplies 8583 Del Mar Analytical $1.120.00 Biosolids Analysis 85" Dept of CNII B Environment Erg. $1,000.00 Membership 8585 Dignal Equipment Corporation $1.222.97 Office Equipment 8586 Eastern Electric $6.695.26 Equipment Repair 8587 Edison Co. 56,695.37 Power 8588 Egan Visual Inc. $129.30 Office Supplies 6589 Etex Inc. $258.65 Valve 8590 Eventus $700.00 Maintenance Agreement 8591 Expedan $117.92 Orange County Property Information 8592 ESP Industries $161.64 Mechanical Supplies 8593 Federal Express $359.50 An Freight 8594 Filter Supply Company $741.80 Filters 8595 Fine Science Tools,Inc $205.07 Tools 8596 Fisher Scientific $2,344.94 Lab Supplies 8597 Flat and Vertical,Inc. $114.00 Concrete Cutting 8598 Fountain Valley Camara $116.95 Photo Supplies 0599 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc, $107.75 Paint Supplies 8600 Fry's Electronics $1,517.72 Electronic B Computer Supplies 8601 Fst Sand and Gravel,Inc. $157.60 Road Base Materials County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County " Claims Paid 12/24/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8602 GanaR-Callahan Company $3,439.38 Chemicals 8603 Gary Young $2,640.00 Lab Services 8604 The Gas Company $20.260.26 Natural Gas 8605 Gates Fiberglass Installers $17,699.00 Air Ducts 8606 General Binding Corporation $290.68 Office Machine Repairs 8607 General Electric Company $2,615.00 Electric Parts 8608 General Electric Supply Company $5,792.64 Electric Parts 8609 GTE California $776.84 Telephone Services 8610 Geunge Castle $1,494.16 Pump Parts 8611 Giedlch-Mitchen,Inc. $495.43 Pump Paris 8612 Global Knowledge Network $5,300.00 Training Registration 8613 Goyee reenl Instill Inc. $678.00 Publication 8614 WW Grainger Inc. $383.03 Compressor Pads 8615 Graybar Electric Company $455.79 Computer Hardware 8616 Great American Printing Co. $5.010.33 Printing 8617 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $449.42 Janitorial Supplies 8618 GLI International $2,645.98 Equipment Repair 8619 GMF Sound,Inc. $196.53 Electric Pads 8620 GIST,Inc./Micro Cily $515.58 Office Supplies 8621 GTE Communications System $1,239.43 Internet Connection Service Y. 8622 Haaker Equipment Company $1,1]0.89 Truck Pads v 8623 Harald Primrose Ice $48.00 Ice For Samples Y n 8624 HerperB Co. $133.85 Excellence Awards to a625 Heulaway Storage Containers $2,928.00 Container Rentals 1 8626 HIM Inc $1,900.24 Tools w 8627 Haarbiper Service Inc E564.97 Compressor Pads 8628 Home Depot $532.64 Small Hardware 8629 Houghton International Inc. $379.74 Usage Fee Refund 8630 Hub Auto Supply $49.42 Track Pads 8631 Hughes Aircraft Company $4,104.44 Usage Fee Refund 8632 HACH Company $111.90 Lab Supplies 8633 Industrial Threaded Products $431.75 Connectors 86M Information Resources $700.00 Personnel Services 8635 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $128.20 Lab Supplies 8636 Interstate Battery Systems $635.19 Safteries 8637 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $134.02 Water Use 8638 IBM Corporation-Way $324.00 Servlce Contract 8639 IDM Controls Inc $645.62 Equipment Repair 8640 IPCO Safety-Ca $63.62 Safety Supplies 8641 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $2,161.47 Instrument Supplies 8642 James A.Ubedo $209.79 Usage Fee Refund 8643 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $1.695.00 Equipment Rental 8544 Janice E.Mclnally,MFCC $750.00 Professional Services 8645 Jays Ordering $592.92 Directors'Meeting Expense 8646 Johnstone Supply $1.622.89 Electric Paris 8647 Knorr Industrial Supplies $6.793.43 Tools 8648 Kona Kai Mobile Home Park $2.491.50 Usage Fee Refund 8649 KT Laundromat $270.33 Usage Fee Refund 8650 Lab Safety Supply,lnc. $2.021.55 Safety Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 12/24/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8651 Lob Support $5.431.32 Temporary Employment Services 8652 Labehronh $5,578.59 Computer Hardware 8653 League Of Ca Cities &30.00 Meeting Registration 8654 League Of Celhomle Cities $30.00 Meeting Registration 6655 Lures Western,Inc. $730.48 Usage Fae Refund 86M LustmZrd $598,93 Safety Supplies 8657 LIMS/Lefief $99.00 Subscription 8658 M.E.Slitermann Co. &16,95TT7 Sewer Repair 8659 M.E.Silbennann Co. $4.711.60 Sewer Repair 8660 W E.Silbennann Co. $11.876.71 Sewer Repair 8661 Magic Solutions $175.88 Publications 8662 Maintenance Technology Corp. $868.67 Mectranical Parts 8663 Mar Vac Eledronics &78AI Instrument Supplies 8664 Mark Optics,Inc. $7824,11 Usage Fee Refund 8665 Marriott Rancho Las Palmas Reaod $14520 Conference Registration 8666 Mc Junkln Corp &4,406.87 Plumbing Supplies 8667 McKenna Engineering&Equipment $918.62 Pump Parts 8668 Medlin Controls Co. $55.27 Instrument Supplies m 8669 Midway Mfg&Machining Co $9.190.79 Mechanical Repairs >< W70 Min. $67.75 Electric Paris r W71 Minnesota Western $208,78 Lab Supplies µ 8672 Minority Progress $698.00 Notices&Ads 8673 Mission Abrasive Supplies $13.80 Safety Supplies to 8674 Mission Uniform Service $3,379.55 Uniform Rentals c 8675 Mobile Modular Management Corp $603.40 Office Trailer Lease 8676 Mo0on IndusMes $165,18 Pump Paris 8677 MoloPhoto 52120 Photographic Services 8676 Multi W Systems,Inc $1,352.92 Pump Parts 8679 MPS Photographic Services &695.58 Photographic Services 8580 MPS Photographic Services $108.50 Photographic Services ll Nas. $1,171.00 Lab Supplies 8682 National Mlcrocomp Services $1.685.00 Maintenance Agreement 8683 New Horizons Computer Learning $2.396.00 On-She Tmining 86" Newport Center Medical $251.87 Usage Fee Refund 8685 Newport Center Medical $765.65 Usage Fee Refund 86M Newport Harbor yactit Club $172.82 Usage Fee Refund 8687 Ocean Products Research Inc. $112.57 Lob Supplies 8680 Office Depot Business Services $1,621.85 Office Supplies 8689 Orange County Business Council $25.00 Workshop Registration 8690 Orange County Pump Co. $912.52 Pump Parts 8691 Orange County Red Chase $44.00 Safety Training 6692 Orange County Wholesale Electric $627.40 Instrument Supplies 8693 Orange VMve&FMing Company $630.77 Fill 8694 Oxygen Service Company $177.56 Specialty Gases 8695 Padfic Bell $146.95 Telephone Services 8696 Pacific Ball Internet Servces S6.203.00 Internet Services 8697 Pacific Mechanical Supply $18.763.38 Plumbing Supplies 8698 Padfic Pads and CoMhab,Inc. $10.309.76 Instrument Supplies W99 Petlro Janitorial Supplies $437.31 Janitorial Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County r Claims Paid 1=4197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8700 Pane Unlimited $61.82 Truck Parts 8701 Pascal B Ludwig,Inc. $19,440.00 Construction J-33-2 8702 Plegel On Company $332.32 Usage Fee Refund 0703 Polypure,Inc.Wor Polydym, Inc. $17.182.36 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 8704 Premier Fastener Company $390.15 Tools 8705 Pryor Resources,Inc. $211 Training Registration 8705 Pubafeeder,Inc. $679.33 Pump Parts 8707 R 8 R Instrumentation,Inc. $298.13 Equipment Repair 8708 R W Beck $23,058.72 Professional Services MO 7-30-97 8709 Rabco $1,980.00 Electric Pads 8710 Rip Van Winkle $401.82 Usage Fee Refund 8711 Rohn B Tucker Alorneys Al Law $2,339.73 Legal Services 8712 Rytech,Inc. $14,620.00 Professional Services 8713 RUN Group,Inc. $23,036.25 CMS Consu0ing Services 8714 HIS Hughes Ca.,Inc. $776.75 Paint Supplies 8715 S B J Chevrolet Allison Transmissan $2,953.89 Truck Repairs 8716 Sancen Engineering, Inc. $8,901.00 Engineering Services 8717 Scienl1kc Spray Finishes $176.74 Usage Fee Refund 8718 Segrembr Corporation $3,165.61 Small Hamwans 9719 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $36.11 Tools W 8720 Shuroluck Sales B Engineering $782.59 Tools I Hardware c' 8721 Slamon,Larsen 8 Marsh E8,000.00 Professional Services .µ+ 8722 SkIIIPaIh Seminars 53,995.00 On-Site Training to $723 Sourcecom 586.57 Publication t 8724 South Coast Air Duality Mgmt. $10.00 Pemril Fees 8725 South Coast Water $45.00 Lab Supplies 8726 Southern California Gas Company $21.000.00 Natural Gas 8727 Southern California Marine Institute $965.00 Rental Equipment 8728 Standard Supply 8 Equipment Co $116.40 Pump Pans 8729 State Chemical Mfg.Co. $384.68 Janitorial Supplies 8730 StateNet $165.00 Seminar Registration 8731 Strata International,Inc. $957.61 Chemicals 8732 Systems Bio Industries,Inc. 55,974.53 Usage Fee Refund 8733 SWRCS Accounting Office $400.00 Annual Fee 8734 Thomas M.Dawes,P.E. $7,82D.00 Professional Services 8735 Thompson Industrial Supply.Inc. $195.91 Mechanical Pads 8736 The Training Clinic $1,165.00 Workshop Registration 8737 Triple A Containers $334.85 Usage Fee Refund 8738 Truck 6 Auto Supply,Inc. $917.26 Track Parts 6739 Michelle Tuchman $61.10 Telephone Expense Reimb. 8740 Two Roads Professional Resource $3,400.00 Consulting Services 8741 TRW Space and Electronics Group $388.00 Equipment Codification 8742 The Unlsource Corporation $523.87 Office,Supplies 8743 United Financial Casualty CO. $6.325.20 ^Check Was Voided— B744 United Parcel Service $692.43 Parcel Services 8745 US FilterlPolymelrics,Inc. $1.262.75 Lab Supplies B746 Valley Cities Supply Company $5,596.51 Plumbing Supplies 8747 Varian $263.55 Lab Supplies 8748 Veme's Plumbing $40.00 Plumbing Services County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 1224197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 0749 TIN Coroorp.Communications Supplies 5916.09 Instrument Supplies 8750 Vision Service Plan4CA) $7,776,30 Vision Service Premium 8751 VAR Scientific Products $9,87361 Lab Supplies 8752 The Wackenhut Corporation $5,845.01 Contract Service-Security Guards 8753 Waste Markets $18,199.99 Residual.Removal M03.27-98 0754 Western States Chemical Inc. $6.985.68 Caus9c Soda MO 8.23-95 8755 Nancy J.Wheatley $161.50 Meeting Expense Relmb. 8756 Wdeg Scientific $570.57 Lab Supplles 8757 Blake Andenwn $523.73 Meeting Expense Rehnb. 8758 Donald F.McIntyre $1.801.91 Meetng Expense ReIrd. 8759 Robed Galen $2,114.44 Meeting Expense Rehnb. 8760 County Sanitallon District of OC $942.11 Petty Cash Relmb. 8761 Bar Tech Teem..Inc. $3.020.89 Telephone Installation 8762 CalBomla Environmental Controls,Inc. 524.50 Pumppads 8763 Conem MMP Inspection Inc $923.20 Inspection Services 87M Santa Fe Beg Co.,Ina $7.542.50 Sand Bags Total Claims Paid 122497 $2,710.016.28 T F� O' � Summery Amount m a District No. 1 $4,04162 District No.2 $8.274.62 District No.3 $5,346.51 District No.5 $1.190.34 CORF $1.551,949.71 Sell Insurance Funds $5,277.22 Joint Operations $1,133.934.24 $2,710,016.26 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING February 19, 1998 - 5:00 p.m. Huntington Beach City Hall City Council Chamber 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, met in a Special Meeting at the above hour and date. The Chair called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. She announced that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss information regarding the status of alternatives for collection system improvements to handle future wastewater flows. DIRECTORS PRESENT: Shirley Dettloff, Chair. Dave Sullivan. Joint Chairman John Collins DIRECTORS ABSENT: Todd Spitzer STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, David A. Ludwin, Gary Streed, Jim Herberg OTHERS PRESENT: John Cavanaugh, General Counsel; David Webb, Robert Eichblatt, Steve Krieger, Ray Silver, Don Noble, Darrell Smith . .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. . . . The Chair invited members of the public wishing to address the Board to come forward. Statements and questions from the public are summarized below: • Why is there a rush to approve an alternative and to move forward? • There is a concern that these alternatives may in effect result in taxpayers subsidizing the developer. • Why is it being proposed that existing city lift station "D" be abandoned? • LAFCO approval of annexation of Bolsa Chica into District No. 11 is required. • Why is a special meeting being held? • How long has background information on these issues been available? • Does the staffs technical opinion represent the City's official position? i The General Manager, Don McIntyre explained that this meeting is a special meeting of Sanitation District No. 11 Board for the purpose of discussing alternatives for collection system improvements as an information item. Mr. McIntyre mentioned that District No. 11 is obligated to annex the proposed Boise Chica development in accordance with the 1991 pre-annexation agreement with Signal Boise Company, the predecessor to the Koll Company. Mr. McIntyre further explained that the goal of the alternatives is to meet our obligation to Koll, and at the same time, maximize the effectiveness of the collection system by minimizing the total number of sewage lift stations, thereby minimizing overall sewer service costs to the District No. 11 service area. The Director of Engineering, David Ludwin introduced the District No. 11 regional collection system study prepared by the Districts' consultant, Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM). Project Manager, Jim Herberg stated that there were originally six alternatives considered, two of which did not provide enough additional capacity to handle future flows from the proposed Bolsa Chica development. Mr. Herberg described the four remaining alternatives and the associated costs as discussed in the agenda report. It was noted that staff from the City of Huntington Beach were consulted during the evaluation of alternatives and that their preference from an engineering perspective was the third alternative (alternative 4A). Discussion ensued regarding the City of Huntington Beach and Koll Co.'s potential cost share for the alternatives. David Ludwin explained timing considerations regarding Koll's application for annexation and selection of an alternative for sewer improvements. Districts and City staff answered questions from the public and Directors. General Counsel, John Cavanaugh discussed the District's obligation to annex the property in accordance with the 1991 pre-annexation agreement. Blake Anderson explained that the Sanitation Districts and City of Huntington Beach engineering staffs are focusing on how to best handle wastewater flows in the study area, and that proposed cost shares are proportional to each party's sewage flows through the facilities. Gary Streed explained that initial estimates of the Koll Company's connection and annexation fees were based upon a much larger project than is currently planned. It was explained that the City's Lift Station "D" is in need of complete replacement. Acting City Deputy Director of Public Works, David Webb noted that the Sunset Beach Sanitary District's agreement with the City for sewer service is currently being renegotiated. It was noted that the City of Huntington Beach was not a party to the 1991 pre-annexation agreement between Koll (Signal Bolsa) and District No. 11. Adjournment The Chair the declared the meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. Seciletary pro teiih of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 H:\wp.dta\agenda\1998 Joint Board Minutes\021998.D11.doc JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Me ng Dae TO it B15. 03/25/98 AGENDA REPORT I em NumEu ,ter be County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Califomia FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Ross H. Tipps, Senior Accounting Clerk SUBJECT: Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts by Roll Call Vote. (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each district represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Staff recommends ratification of payment of claims in accordance with the attached check listing. SUMMARY See attached check listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Xb �1 p Re F— R. 11 s Page 1 N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Copies of Claims Paid reports from 01/07/98 and 01/21198. n:'wp F—.1 R. ,.� Page 2 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 01/07M Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8778 Dell Marketing L.P. $25,245.54 Computers 8779 Edison Co. $55,047.71 Power 8780 Giadich-Mitchell,Inc. $136.672.26 Pump Parts 8781 Mladen Buntich Construction Co. $135.226.80 Construction 3.311-3.2-R47 8702 Pima Gro Systems Inc $200,194.44 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 8783 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms $56.367.26 Residuals Removal 8784 Waste Markets $46.603.55 Residuals Removal MO 3.27-96 8785 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart $68.500.60 Legal Services MO 7-26.95 8786 American Telephone&Telegraph-Megacom $3,338.15 Lang Distance Telephone Services 8787 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $5.05 Lang Distance Telephone Services 8788 American Telephone It Telegraph-Pro Wags $777.90 Long Distance Telephone Services 8789 Air Liquids America Corporation $1.950.21 Specialty Gasses 8790 Al,Products and Chemicals,Inc. $12.60 O&M Agreement Ozy Gen.Syst.MO 8.8-89 8791 Allied Parking&Rubber Inc. $71.17 Plumbing Supplies 8792 American Airlines $6,564.14 Travel Services 8793 Amedcan Otgnal Technologies $641.12 On-She Training 8794 Appleone Employment Service $110.40 Temporary Employment Services 8795 Applied Industrial Technology $549.53 Pump Parts 8796 Arizona Instrument $1,299.47 Instrument Supplies 8797 Armor-Vac, $705.00 Vacuum Truck Services 879E Awards&Trophies By Bea $30.28 Plaques 8799 ACCU-Sludge $484.30 Lab Supplies 8800 AMA/Keye Productively Center $268.00 Seminar Registration 8801 Assoc of Melro.Sewerage Agencles $476.00 Conference Registration 8802 ASO Course Registration $920.00 Training Registration 8803 Bailey Fischer&Porter Company $208.42 Chlorination Supplies 8804 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $427.99 Printing MO 11-7-94 8805 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $5,690.39 Computer Sohl 8806 BloMerieuz Velek,Inc $101.20 Lab Supplies 8807 Bureau Of Business Practice $218.20 Subscription 8808 C.P.I. $1,558.09 Lab Supplies 8809 C.S.U.F.Foundation $17.500.00 Develop Demographic Data&Support 8810 Cal-Glass,Inc. $193.42 Lab Supplies sail California Automatic Gate $790.32 Service Agreement 8812 Calirol,Inc, $203.39 Hardware 8813 Carl Wanen&Co. $161.65 Insurance Claims Administrator 8014 Mark Castillo $1,154.69 Training Expense Reimb. 8815 Cenlrepointe Commercial Interiors $973.15 Office Furniture 8016 Century Safety $81.35 Safety Supplies 8817 Cerfnel $20.00 Computer Services 8818 Certanium Alloys Company $257.72 Welding Supplies 8819 City of Huntington Beach $10,91"1 Water Use B820 City of Huntington Beach $270.00 Water Use B821 Clayton Group Services,Inc $1.714.50 Professional Services 8822 Cole-Pamer Instrument Company $648.98 Lab Supplies 8823 Communications Performance Group $7,148.00 Professional Services 8824 Compuexpress and Scott Mebust $1,726.20 Employee Computer Loan Program 8825 Compuserve Incorporated $1,162.03 Computer Services 81126 Computers America,Inc. $942.17 Computer Supplies County Sanitation Districts a orange County Claims Paid 01/07/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8827 Connell GM Parts $44.07 Truck Pads 8828 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $13,387.19 Electric Parts 8829 Consolidated Reprographics $8.28 Printing Services a830 Contractors Equipment Co $1,453.76 Chine Rental 8831 Cooper Cameron Corporation $153.95 Engine Pads 8832 Copeloo Capital,Inc. $1,432.00 Copier Lease 8833 Corporate Express $2,770.12 Office Supplies 8834 Crane Veyor Corp. $12,117.35 Crane System 8835 Creative Management Solutions $1,200.00 Professional Services 8836 Culligan Water $28.00 Soft Water Service 8837 CCI Technologies $1,690.00 Cable Installation 8838 GEM Corporation $991.54 Lab Supplies 8839 CS Company $13,140.26 Plumbing Supplies 8840 CSMFO 1998 Annual Seminar $180.00 Seminar Registration 6641 Dad Controls,Inc. $1,526.94 Instrument Supplies 8812 DataCem Services $580.00 Equipment Repair 8843 De Gualle 8 Sons Glen Co. $596.89 Safety Glass 8844 Delta Dental $247.21 Dental breuhinco Plan 8845 Department of Pesticide Regulation $25.00 Application Fee 8846 DeZudck $170.40 Valves 8847 Diamond H Recognition $174.21 Service Awams 8848 Dickens Inc. $123.42 Electrical Pads 8849 Dremel $42.29 Tools 8850 Dunn-Edwards Corporation $1.000.28 Paint Supplies 8851 DME,Inc. $556.51 Compressor Pads 8852 EcoAna"Is,Inc. $3.977.50 Consulting Services 8853 Enchanter,Inc $1.400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 8854 Engineering News Record $79.74 Subscription 8855 Environmental Resources Association $1,339.40 Lab Services 8856 EEI Publication Orders $48.00 Publication 8857 EMED $548.41 Electrical Pans 8858 ENS Resources,Inc. $2,731.13 Professional Services 8859 Federal Express $595.36 Air Freight 8860 Filter Supply Company $7,467.03 Filters Befit Finnigan Corp $998.60 Service Agreement 8862 Flo-Systems,Inc. $9,959.65 Pump Pans 8863 Forth Benefits Insurance Company $8,485.40 Disability Insurance Premiums-Dec 97 Sam Fountain Valley Palms,Inc. $349.28 Paint Supplies 8865 Franklin Quest Co $211.64 Grace,Supplies 8866 Frys Electronics $5,295.31 Electronic B Computer Supplies 8867 Full Spechum AnaMics,Inc. $4,485.73 Equipment Repair 8868 Garrati-Callahan Company $1,810.20 Chemicals 8869 The Gas Company $68.67 Natural Gas 8870 Gales Fiberglass Installed, $7,018.75 Air Ducts 8871 General Petroleum $9,689.45 Unleaded Gasoline 8872 GTE California $8,548.48 Telephone Services 8873 Graphic Distributors $310.58 Photographic Supplies 8874 Greseby STl $1.005.24 Engine Parts 8875 Great American Printing Co $337.62 Printing Services County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 01/07/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description BB76 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $129.30 Janitorial Supplies 8877 GST,Inc./Micro City $20.187,04 Computers 8878 Harold Primrose Ica $96.00 Ice For Samples BB79 Hatch&Kirk Inc. $5,003.88 Truck Pads 8880 Hello Direct,Inc. $224.62 Telephone Equipment 8881 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Dell $123,05 Directors Meeting Expense 8882 Home Depot $92.14 Small Hardware 8883 Hach Company $4.145,05 Lab Supplies 88M Imaging Plus,Inc. $953.15 Office Supplies 8885 Industrial Steam $352.99 Pumps M86 Industrial Threaded Products $23.71 Connectors 8887 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $224.81 Truck Parts 8888 law,Inc $824.29 Instrument Supplies 8809 J&W Scientific $130.75 Flowmeter Service 8890 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $453.76 Instrument Pads 8891 J.D.Edwards World Solutions Co. $5.133.15 Software License Fees MO 7.24-96 8892 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $1,400,00 Construction Services 8893 Jay's Catering $1.736.65 Directors Meeting Expanse 8894 Johnstone Supply $272,17 Electric Pads 6895 J2 Priming Services $753,17 Printing 8896 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan $22.205.95 Medical Insurance Premium 8897 Keith D Stolzenbach,PH.D.,P. $1,950.00 Ocean Monitoring 889E Kelly Paper $958.38 Paper 8899 Kewaunee Scientific Corporation $1,050.00 Workbench 8900 Knox Industrial Supplies $1,362.52 Tools 8901 LA.Cellular Telephone Company $1,428.56 Cellular Telephone Service 8902 Lab Support $1,691.13 Temporary Employment Services 8903 Lakilaw Environmental Svcs $2,012.50 Hazardous Material Disposal 8904 Lakewood Publications $79.00 Subscription 8905 LaserAll Corporation $&74A8 Printer Repairs 59M Lautzenhlser's Stationery $255.78 Office Supplies 59U7 LeMofte Company $618.00 Lab Services 8908 Listed Corporation $465.02 Track Pads 8909 Liquid Handling Systems $68.82 Pump Pads 8910 LA Cellular Telephone Company $2,447.51 Cellular Telephone Service 8911 Management Health Senlcas,Inc. $3,220.00 Pre limployneent Physicals 8912 Mar Vac Electronics $94.74 Instrument Supplies 8913 Me Junkln Corp $422.59 Plumbing Supplies 8914 McKenna&Ounce,L.L.P. $450.00 Pump Pens 8915 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. $302.40 Tools 8916 Metier,Inc $9.150.00 Consulting Senicas 8917 Mezce $200.00 Engineering Services 8918 Mission Uniform Sends $1.548.44 Uniform Rentals 8919 Mitchell Repair Information Cc $163.79 Publication 8920 Mutual Propene 1410.62 Propane 8921 MPS Photographic Services,Inc $76.46 Photographic Senims 8922 N.Glantz&Son $665.69 Small Hardware 8923 Nat West Markets $750.00 COP Interest Draw Fees 8924 National Business Womens Leadership Assoc. $69.00 Seminar Registration County Sanitation Dlstdcta Of Orange County Claims Paid OIM7198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8925 National Notary Association $134.00 Workshop Registration 8926 National Plant Services,Inc. $7.887.50 Vacuum Truck Services 8927 Notional Technology Transfer $595.00 Seminar Registration 892B Neal Supply Cc $980.20 Plumbing Supplies 8929 New Horizons Computer Looming $899.00 Software Training Classes 8930 City of Newport Beach $53.07 Water Use 8931 Nosalynx System Inc $10,341.15 Sollware 8932 Office Pavillion $1,307.74 Office Supplies 8933 Orange County Forum $50.00 Meeting Registration 8934 Orange County Wholesale Electric $4,320.56 Instrument Supplies 8935 Ortiz Fire Protection $425.00 Service Agreement 8936 Oxygen Service Company $304.21 Specialty Gases 8937 Pacific Ball $1.165.83 Telephone Services 8938 Pacific Mechanical Supply $168.09 Plumbing Supplies 8939 Pedro Janitorial Supplies $4,084.85 Janitorial Supplies 8940 Pagenet $635.03 Rental Equipment 89ll Parts Unlimited $578.74 Track Pads 8942 Peeress Wiping Materials Co. $721.93 Shop Supplies 8943 Petce Animal Supplies $83.03 Lab Supplies 89" Political Pulse $95.00 Subscription 8945 Poly Enterprises Inc., $347.49 Road Cones 8946 Presidium Inc $2,083.33 Workers Comp Claims Admin. 8947 Public Risk Management Assoc. $920.01), Membership 8948 Pumping Solutions Inc. $99.04 Mechanical Supplies 8949 PSOC Pool Supply of Orange County $32.97 Operating Supplies 8950 Red Wing Shoes $442.20 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 8951 Reliestar $19,2213.31 Life Insurance Premium 8952 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. $4,830.08 Life Insurance Premium 8953 Remedy $9.95D.93 Temporary Employment Sarvlces 8954 Rome Sales Company,Inc. $253.21 Equipment Repair 8955 Ryan Herco Products Corp. $234.86 Metal 8956 Schwing America,Inc. $287.92 Pump Pads 8957 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $672.87 Specialty Gases 8958 Scott,Reilly B Whitehead $448.39 Legal Services-Personnel Services 8959 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. $355.00 Lab Repairs 8960 Sears $92.43 Tools&Supplies 8961 Secretary of Slate $100.00 Consolidation Filing Fee Fine 8962 Sansorex $440.49 Electric Paris B963 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $866.59 Tools 8964 Shureluck Sales B Engineering $1.978.46 Tools l Hardware 8965 Sigma-Aldrich.Inc. $1.211.58 Safety Supplies 8966 Southern California Water $108.71 Water Use 8967 Spading Instrument Co.,Inc. $139.58 Meter 8968 Sprint $35.55 Long Distance Telephone Services 8969 StaleNet $165.00 Maintenance Contract 8970 Starting Art $99.59 Art Supplies 8971 Douglas M.Stewart $149.00 Seminar Registration Reimb. 8972 Summit Steel $2.138.71 Metal 8973 Sunset Ford $395.91 Truck Paris County Sanitation Districts Or orange Count' Claims Paid 01/07/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description $974 Taylor-Donn $86.85 Eledric Cad Parts 8975 The Holman Group $773.90 EAP Premium 8976 The Office,Of Conferences&Training $395.00 Conference Registration 8977 The Register $803.60 Notices&Ads 8978 Time Warner Communications $40.47 Cable Services 8979 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc $688.82 Truck Parts 8980 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. $1.059.16 Trud(Pads 8981 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $80.00 Lab Services 8982 Ultra Scientific $564.00 Lab Supplies 8983 Unico Consulting Engineers $4,990.00 Professional Services 8984 ULI-the Urban Land Insldute 534.95 Publication 8985 Valley Cities Supply Company $51.05 Plumbing Supplies 8988 Valley Splicing Co. 5800.00 Equipment Repair 8987 Vertex $533.37 Office Furniture 8988 VAR Scientific Products $4,015.30 Lab Supplies 8989 Wayne Electric Co. $297.64 Electric Supplies 8990 Wesco Distribdion Inc. $22.79 Instrument Supplies 8991 Western States Chemical Inc. $14,507.94 Caustic Soda M08.23-95 8992 Wilder Soeware Seminars $298.00 Conference Registration 8993 Woodward-Clyde Consultants &2,035.00 Professional Services 8994 WEF Membership $107.00 Membership 8995 Xerox Corporation $1,525.29 Copier Leases 8996 Janice Debay $490.00 Conference Registration 8997 Danny S.Evangelista 5480.00 Publications&Training Supplies Reimb. 8988 Donald F.McIntyre $59.92 Cellular Phone Exp.Reimb. 8999 Dawn M.McKinley $122.16 Training Registration Relmb. 9000 Fred J.O'Brien $191.98 Training Registration Reimb. 9001 Carolyn L.Thompson $368.51 Office Supplies Reimb. 9002 National Notary Association $72.00 Workshop Registration 9003 The Norm Companies $198.80 Mail Delivery Service Total Claims Paid 01/07/98 $1.140,317.51 Summery Ammrd District No.3 $203,727.40 CORF $221,525.58 Joint Operations $715,064.43 $1.140.317.51 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 01/21/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9034 County of Orange $100,000.00 Sewer Line Relocation 9035 GST,Inc./Micro City $58,517.17 Computers 9036 J.D.Edwards World Solutions $59,033.35 Software License Fees MO 7-24-96 9037 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. $47,154.55 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 9038 Pima Gro Systems Inc $99,184.38 Residuals Removal M03.29-95 9039 Southern California Edison $31,099.80 Power 9040 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms $63,750.22 Residuals Removal 9041 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $67,774.T7 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No,04" 9042 Advrrca Constructors Inc $160,319.70 Construction J-34-1,P2-35-5 9043 Airyol Construction,Inc. $137.657.19 Construction P1-51R 9044 Margate Construction Inc. $839,540.68 Conshuclion P141,P1 43 9045 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $8.97 Long Distance Telephone Services 9046 A-Adams Locksmith School of Look Tech. $6.067.86 Trelning Registration 9047 A-Plus Systems $2,588.56 Notices&Ads 904E American Management Association $8.400.00 Training Registration 9049 American Management Association $1,295.00 Training Registration 9050 Amedpec,Inc. $22,223.86 Reconciliation User Refund 9051 Applied Industrial Technology $3,134.97 Pump Paris 9052 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting $235.00 Lab Supplies 9053 Asbury Environmental Services $35.00 Waste Oil Removal 9054 Associated Ready Mixed Concrete $339.14 Concrete 9055 Acoustic Standards.Inc. 54,788.65 Acoustical Materials 9D56 ACT Group Inc. $300.00 Service Agreement 9D57 Assoc of Metro Sewerage Agencies $475.00 Conference Registration 9058 Bank of America $321.02 Bank Service Fees 9D59 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $350.00 Telephone Installation 9060 SioMerfeux Walk,Inc. $735.14 Lab Supplies 9061 Black Box Corporation $37.40 Computer Parts 9062 Bloomberg L.P. $4.994.21 Financial Monitoring M04.14-93 9063 Jeffrey Brown $250.00 Travel Expanses 9064 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $3,085.00 Janitorial Services M01-12-94 9065 Cal-Glass,Inc. $1.346.89 Lab Supplies 9066 Callrol,Inc. $227.51 Hardware 9067 Canus Corporation $19.600.00 Fiber Optic Cable 9068 Carl Wanen&Co. $863.33 Insurance Claims Administrator 9069 Ceder Co.Track 8 Automotive $155.67 Track Pads 9070 Cenlrepointe Commercial interior, $395.10 Office Furniture 9071 City of Huntington Beach $22.93 Water Use 9072 Computers America,Inc. $3.985.49 Computer Supplies 9073 James Cong $109A5 Training Expense Relmb. 9074 Connell Chevrolet/GEO $23,449.54 Truck Paris 9075 Consolidated Electrical Distributers $5,790.13 Electric Pads 9076 Conveyor Components Co $873.07 Electric Parts 9077 Cooper Cameron Corporation $2.018.66 Engine Parts 9078 Corporate Express $1,382.94 OfBca Supplies 9079 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $17029 Truck Pads 9080 County of Orange-Auditor Controller $4,840.00 Underground Tank Fee 9081 County Sanitation Districts of OC $10,646.89 Workers Comp Reimb. 9082 County Sanitation Districts of OC $2.678.00 Medicare Tax Deduction County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 01/21/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9083 County Wholesale Electric Co. $3,148.95 Electric Pads S094 CCI Technologies $15520 Work Station Installation 9085 CJ International $167.00 Publication 9086 Creative Power Management $3,500.00 Consulting Services 9087 CS Company $3,546.75 Plumbing Supplies 9088 Dell Marketing L.P. $10,133.16 Computers 9089 DeZurick $716.03 Valves 9090 Diamond H Rocognlllon $83.38 Service Awards 9091 Dunn-Edwards Corporation $272.66 Paint Supplies 9092 Duthie Generator Service,Inc. $6,30D.00 Equipment Rental 9093 Eagle Distribution $265.10 Electric Cart Pads 9094 EcoAnalysis,Inc. $8.150.00 Consulting Services 9095 Edison Co. $6.567.07 Power 9096 Electra Bond,Inc. $3,340.25 Mechanical Paris 9097 Eleclan Test,Inc. $2,175.00 Electrical Supplies 9098 Enchanter,Inc. $700.OD Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 9099 Environmental taw Institute $20.00 Publication 9100 ESP Industries $557.47 Mechanical Supplies 9101 Federal Express $196.50 Air Freight 9102 Bailey-Fischer B Porter Co. $673.18 Chlorination Supplies 9103 Fisher Scientific $362.26 Lab Supplies 9104 Flickinger Company $215.00 Plumbing Supplies 9105 Flo-Systems,Inc $12,554.02 Pump Parts 9106 Fountain Valley Camera $110.99 Photo Supplies 9107 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc $657.67 Paint Supplies 9108 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash $198.00 Truck Wash Tickets 9109 The Foxboro Company $2.203.10 Electrical Supplies 9110 Franklin Covey $365.99 Office Supplies 9111 Franklin Quest Co. $62.09 Office Supplies 9112 Fry's Electronics $2,475.73 Electronic B Computer Supplies 9113 Ganahl Lumber Company $1,535.55 Lumber/Hardware 9114 The Gas Company $12,574.54 Natural Gas 9115 Gateway Medical Center $1,065.00 Pre-Employment Physicals 9116 George T.Hall Co. $1.091.02 Electric Parts 9117 WIN Grainger Inc. $264.00 Compressor Parts 9118 Hach Company $1.885.55 Lab Supplies 9119 Harrington Industrial Plastics $320.90 Plumbing Supplies 9120 Pinnacle One $911.00 Consulting Services 9121 Hilti Inc $575.68 Tools 9122 Linda L Holmes $718.75 Hearing Officer 9123 Home Depot $92.04 Small Hardware 9124 Hodba Instruments Inc $681.53 Instrument Supplies 9125 Hub Auto Supply $66.27 Track Parts 9126 Imaging Plus,Inc. $486.01 Office Supplies 9127 Institute for Applied Management $2,853.44 Training Video 9128 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $2.90 Water Use 9129 IBM $324.00 Service Contract 9130 IDEXX Distribution Corp. $101.80 Lab Supplies 9131 WCO Safety-Ca $238.37 Safety Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 01/21/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9132 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc $1.354.07 Instrument Supplies 9133 J.P.Morgan Securities $22.785.75 COP Remarketing Agreement 9134 Jaye Catering $178.39 Directors'Meeting Expense 9135 Johnstone Supply $213.60 Electric Pads 9136 K.P.Lindstrom $6.623.76 Envlr.Consulting Services P1-36,J33 9137 Keiser Foundation Health Plan $22.208.95 Medical Insurance Premium 9138 Kolar Corp $5,880.45 Training Materials 9139 Knox Industrial Supplies $714.70 Tools 9140 Lawrence Ragan Communications $89.00 Subscription 9141 League Of California Cities $50.00 Publication 9142 LA Cellular Telephone Company $452.47 Cellular Telephone Service 9143 M.E.Canfield Co. $3.100.00 Safety Training 91" MacDonald-Stephens Engineers,Inc $22,478.82 Engineering Services 2-37 9145 Maintenance Technology Corp. $74.17 Mechanical Pads 9146 Mar Vac Electronics $397.78 Instrument Supplies 9147 Margate Construction,Inc. $1,200.00 Temporary Bracing 9148 Medlin Controls Co. $784.55 Instrument Supplies 9149 Mesa Energy Systems,Inc. $277.00 Electrical Parts 9150 Midway Mfg&Machining Co $5.205.90 Mechanical Repairs 9151 Mission Ungomr Service $4,901.51 Uniform Rentals 9152 Monitor Labs Inc 52,262.49 Instrument Supplies 9153 Morton Saft $549.63 Sag 9154 Motion Industries $1.136.52 Pump Parts 9155 MotoPholo $44.53 Photographic Services 9156 Mine Safety Appliances Company $10.42 Instrument Supplies 9157 Nat West Markets $750.00 Interest Drew Fees 9158 National Audlu-Visual Supply $347.46 Office Supplies 9159 National Technology Transfer $2,770.00 Training Registration 9160 Neal Supply Cc $980.20 Plumbing Supplies 9161 New Hor¢ons Computer Learning $2,598.00 Software Tralning Classes 9162 Newark Electronics $2,155.69 Instrument Supplies 9163 Nodab $462.20 Chemicals 9164 NAGDCA $400.OD Membership 9165 Office Depot Business Services $3.401.97 Office Supplies 9166 The Chimed Corporation $489.19 Electrical Pads 9167 Orange County Wholesale Electric $3,194.01 Instrument Supplies 9168 Orange Vain&FitOng Company $263.82 Fittings 9169 Orion Research,Inc. $195.75 Lab Supplies 9170 Oxygen Service Company $3.008.94 Specialty Gases 9171 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. $933.48 Electric Supplies 9172 Pacific Bell $232.41 Telephone Services 9173 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. $22,987.02 Instrument Parts 9174 Pacific Tek $11.004.25 Mechanical Parts 9175 Pagenet $1.435.08 Rental Equipment 9176 Parker Diving Services,Inc. $8,848.90 Bid Guarantee Refund 9177 Parts Unlimited $57.68 Truck Parts 9178 Patriot Video Productions $945.54 Training Videos 9179 Petco Animal Supplies $32.26 Lab Supplies 9180 Power Generation Consulting $630.00 Consulting Services County Sanitation Districts Of orange County Claims Paid 01/21/98 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9181 Power Systems Testing Company $222.58 Generator Repair 9182 Pumping Solutions Inc. $125.19 Mechanical Pads 9183 R.F.MacDonald Co. $283.07 Pump Parts 9184 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc $2,100.05 Trash Removal 9185 Rainin Instrument Co.,Inc. $902.11 Lab Supplies 9186 Red Valve Company,Incorporated $1,277.92 Mechanical Pads 9187 Roberlos Auto Trim Shop 5127.71 Auto Repair 9188 Roma Sales Company,Inc. $253.21 Pump Pans 9189 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. $100.00 Engineering Support Services 9190 RPM Electric Motors $8.157.84 Electric Motor Pads 9191 Santa Ana Electric Motors $415.64 Electric Parts 9192 Schwing America,Inc. $91.47 Pump Pads 9193 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. 52,813.49 Specialty Gases 9194 Second-Sun $558.17 Light Fixtures 9195 Secretary of State $72.00 Workshop Registration 9196 Seim Products Co $181.90 Meter Connector 9197 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $537.71 Tools 9198 Shimadzu Scientific Instrument $20,762.14 Lab Equipment 9199 Slemon,Larsen&Marsh $18,000.00 Legal Services 9200 Signi"Idreh,Inc. $151.10 Lab Supplies 9201 SkiliPalh Seminars $1.185.00 Training Registration 9202 Sludge Newsletter $697.00 Subscription 9203 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. $165.56 Plumbing Supplies 9204 South Coast Water $125.00 Lab Supplies 9205 Spec Ceriprep Inc. $998.25 Lab Supplies 9208 Stale Board Of Equalization $449.59 Underground Petroleum Storage Fee 9207 Sunclipse,Inc. $20,494.11 Reconciliation User Refund 9208 Superintendent of Documents $19.00 Publication 9209 SARBS-PDC $2,000.00 Seminar Registration 9210 The Holman Group $768.22 EAP Premium Jan 98 9211 The Register $619.85 Notices&Acts 9212 Thompson Industrial Supply.Inc. $788.16 Mechanical Parts 9213 nine Warner Communication $40.47 Cable Services 9214 Tony Demara Electric $793.00 Equipment Repair 9215 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&S $97.11 Locks&Keys 9216 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. $7,947.68 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 9217 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc $32.01 Truck Parts 9218 Truck Pads Supply&etc. $310.16 Truck Pads 9219 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $794.00 lab Services 9220 U.S.Filler y 2impro,Inc. $3.623.75 Equipment Rental 9221 U.S.Shop Tools $339.41 Tools 9222 The Unisounce Corporation $1.180.88 Office Supplies 9223 United Education Centers,Inc. $1.625.00 Software 9224 United Parcel Service $114.45 Parcel Services 9225 Valley Cities Supply Company $227.44 Plumbing Supplies 9226 The Vantage Group $10.385.00 Consulting Services 9227 Vector Resources $3.965.20 Instrument Parts 9228 'Allege Nurseries $103.44 Landscaping Supplies 9229 Vision Service Plan-(CA) $7,SD5.70 Vision Service Premium County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 0121198 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 9230 VWR Scientific Products $4,820.04 Lab Supplies 9231 W.D.Prout Company $159.28 Reconciliation User Refund 9232 Water Environment Federation $605.00 Seminar Registration 9233 Western Slates Chemical Inc. $7,156.12 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 92N Worldwamh Insilule $23.90 Publication 9235 Xerox Corporation $11,000.67 Copier Leases 9236 Xemx Corporation $9,936.58 Copier Leases 9237 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $9,540.73 Construction P2-35-3,P246,P1-384.P255 9238 Michelle Tuchman $20.66 Expense Relmb. 9239 Frenkie J.Woodside $138.94 Software Relmb. 9240 Best Buy and Debbie Marchegiano $1,925.53 Employee Computer Loan Program 9241 CampuexPress and Mitchell Trivanovich $1.300.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 9242 County of Orange $2.910.00 Administrative Fees 9243 County Sanitation District of OC $1.674.74 Patty Cash Relmb. 9244 Charles E.Frey $2,053.a8 Employee Computer Loan Program 9245 981&HWCWEA,Ina. $2700.00 Conference Registration 9246 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $2.13 Lang Distance Telephone Services 9247 Boyle Engineering Corporation $1.898.06 Engineering Services 3-38 9248 Dalavaclt $94.00 Oasfte Beck-Up Tape Storage 9249 DGA Consultants,Inc. $2,940.00 Engineering Services 3-3841 92M GTE California $5,365.61 Telephone Services 9251 GE Motors&Industrial Systems $11,647.02 Engineering Services 9252 Holmes&Newer Inc $4,679.12 Engineering Services 9253 Moody's Investors Service $5.000.00 Annual Fee 9254 Oxygen Service Company $1.790.96 Specialty Gases 9255 Paolfic Bell Internal Services $1,151.50 Internet Services 92% Sancon Engineering,Inc. $8,900.00 Engineering Services 9257 Schenck Trebel $1,088.33 Freight 9258 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $500.80 Tools/Hardware 9259 SmftMEmery Company $17.732.63 Soil Testing MO 7-13-94 9260 Valley Cities Supply Company $274.37 Plumbing Supplies 9261 Valley Cities Supply Company $11.60 Plumbing Supplies 9262 Xerox Corporation 5403.93 Copier Leases 9263 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $176,419.00 Engineering Services 11-08 92M Orange County Water District $40,368.00 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 Total Claims Paid 01Mt96 $2.525.879.34 Summary Amount District No.2 $43.392.93 District No.3 $32,964.37 District No.7 $12,499.17 CORF $1,649.499.33 Self Insurance Funds $10,545.89 Joint Operations $776,887.85 92,525,879.34 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Ton. ads. --. 3/25/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item rntoer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 7 FROM: Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Originator: Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF GREEN ACRES PROJECT INTERTIE AND OUTFALL CONNECTION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed agreement for Operation of Green Acres Project Intertie and Outfall Connection. SUMMARY: The proposed agreement provides provisions for operation of the Green Acres Project Intertie connections with the Sanitation Districts' outfall. The agreement addresses technical issues about the connection and provides for reimbursement to the Sanitation Districts from the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) for the cost of pumping IRWD's unused reclaimed water through our outfall PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. X Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION H\wp.dtalts=heatleyVnteertie ait for Board 2 25 98 Page 1 Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD), City of Newport Beach (City) and Orange ' County Water District (OCWD) had entered into an agreement in July 1996 which was amended in September 1996 and December 1996. This agreement implemented IRWD's Wetlands Water Supply Project (WWSP). The WWSP Agreement provides, in part, for the design, construction and financing of OCWD's Green Acres Phase II Pipeline (GAP II) and an intertie between IRWD's Michelson Water Reclamation Plant (MWRP) and GAP It. A second agreement between the Sanitation Districts and OCWD commits us to accept from OCWD at least 4.2 MGD of reclaimed water during the period from October 1 through March 31 for a period of 15 years which IRWD commits to transmit such reclaimed water to the Sanitation Districts. This second agreement was entered into by the Sanitation Districts and OCWD in January 1997 (CSDOC GAP II Agreement). Furthermore, the WWSP Agreement provided for the construction of a connection between GAP II and the Sanitation Districts' ocean outfall (Outfall Connection) which was approved subject to the development of an operating agreement. The construction of GAP II, the Intertie and the Outfall Connection are complete. The parties desire to establish an operating agreement for the connection and the method for reimbursing the Sanitation Districts for the operating cost of discharging IRWD's unused reclaimed water through our outfall. The proposed operating agreement provides provisions for operations of GAP II Intertie and Outfall Connection which includes conditions for the ownership of facilities, maintenance, access to outfall connection telemetry, shutdown of Outfall Connection, operating costs (which will be reimbursed to the Sanitation Districts by IRWD), duration of flow commitment, and determination of flow delivered All of these agreements will collectively provide the following results. During the winter months, IRWD will reclaim what it can in its service area, send additional water to OCWD reclamation system for reuse there, and send any unused reclaimed water out our outfall for ocean discharge. This will mean that IRWD will not resort to the controversial practice of discharging tertiary treated fully disinfected water to its wildlife ponds that subsequently overflow to Upper Newport Bay. H.\wp dtalts\Wheatley�ntedie ad for Board 2_25_98 Page 2 ALTERNATIVES V Without approval of this agreement, the conditions of the Outfall Connection Agreement will not be met. CEQA FINDINGS N/A H9wp.dtajts\wneatleyVntert1e alt for Board 2 25 98 Page 3 AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF GREEN ACRES PROJECT INTERTIE AND OUTFALL CONNECTION THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into to be effective this_day of 1998,by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I OF ORANGE _. COUNTY,CALIFORNIA,acting for itself and on behalf of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 2,3, 5,6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,hereinafter referred to as"CSDOC," IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT,hereinafter referred to as „FWD." CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,hereinafter referred to as"CITY;" AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT,hereinafter referred to as"OCWD." RECITAL WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County are duly organized County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, existing pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act,California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 et seq.,and operating individually and collectively pursuant to a Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement,effective July 1, 1985,providing for the ownership,operation and maintenance of wastewater collection,treatment and disposal facilities; and WHEREAS, IRWD, CITY and OC WD have entered into an agreement dated July 17, 1996, as amended by Revised Amendment to Agreement dated September 18, 1996,and Amendment No.2 to Agreement dated December 18, 1996 ("W WSP Agreement',regarding implementation of IRWD's Wetlands Water Supply Project. The W WSP Agreement provides in part for the design,construction and financing of the Green Acres Phase 11 pipeline("GAP B') and an intertie between IRWD's Michelson Water Reclamation Plant("MWRP')and GAP II ("Intertie'),the execution of a written agreement between CSDOC and OCWD pursuant to which CSDOC commits to accept from OCWD at least 4.2 million gallons per day("mgd' of reclaimed water during the period from October 1 through March 31 for a period of fifteen(15) years and commitments by IRWD to transmit such reclaimed water,all subject to specified conditions;and WHEREAS,such written agreement,pursuant to which CSDOC commits to accept from OCWD at least 4.2 mgd of reclaimed water on an annual average basis during the periods described in the preceding recitals,has been entered into by CSDOC and OCWD,on January 15, 1997 ("CSDOC GAP H Agreement'D, and OCWD warrants that the average annual demand for reclaimed water at CSDOC will be approximately 4.5 mgd;and WHEREAS,the W WSP Agreement further provides for the development of a long-term "no discharge"scenario,including,if determined to be feasible by the parties thereto, construction of a connection between GAP 11 and CSDOC's ocean outfall("Outfall Connection");and WHEREAS,CSDOC approved the construction of the Outfall Connection, subject to the development of an operating agreement; and WHEREAS, construction of GAP II,the Intertie and the Outfall Connection are underway or complete,and the parties desire at this time to establish operating agreements and conditions for such facilities; NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein,the parties hereto agree as follows: 2 Section : Ownership of Facilities. IRWD shall own the Cla Valve at the Outfall Connection and al]telemetry equipment for the Outfall Connection, including such equipment as may be located on CSDOC's property. All piping,valves,meters and other equipment comprising the Outfall Connection shall be owned by CSDOC. OCWD shall own GAP H and associated telemetry equipment from the downstream side of the meter vault on University Drive to OCWD's existing Green Acres Project. IRWD shall own the Intertic and associated telemetry equipment, from MWRP to the downstream side of the meter vault on University Drive. Such facilities are schematically depicted on Exhibit"A," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section Maintenance. The parties agree that each of the facilities and equipment shall be maintained and operated by the party owning it as set forth in Section 1. Section 3: Access to Outfall Connection Telemetry. To obtain access to CSDOC's property for routine and scheduled maintenance or repairs of the Outfall Connection Cla Valve and telemetry, IRWD shall provide CSDOC with written or electronic notice one(1)week prior to the date of the maintenance. In the event of an emergency, IRWD shall notify CSDOC by telephone prior to access. CSDOC hereby conveys to IRWD a non-exclusive license for such Cla Valve and telemetry equipment and for such access purposes over the portions of CSDOC's property depicted on Exhibit'B,"which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; provided,that CSDOC may modify the license area or designated access route from time to time following written notice to IRWD. Section 4: Shutdown of Outfall Connection. The Outfall Connection is intended to be used for the disposal of any winter period(October I through March 31, or modified dates 3 determined as provided herein)reclaimed water delivered through GAP II which is in excess of the greater of the 4.6 MGD flow transmission and acceptance commitment or OCWD's Green Acres Project total user demands. It may be necessary for CSDOC to temporarily shut off the Outfall Connection for scheduled or emergency maintenance or repairs or during conditions of high flows through the outfall,such as in storm events. During such shutdowns,IRWD agrees to divert any excess flow of reclaimed water not being used by CSDOC out of the GAP II system to either the CSDOC Main Street Pump Station or,if possible,to IRWD storage facilities. CSDOC shall provide IRWD with written notice one(1)week prior to the date of any scheduled maintenance or repair. In the event of emergency high flow conditions or maintenance requiring a shutdown of the Outfall Connection, CSDOC shall give reasonable notice to IRWD by telephone prior to the shutdown. CSDOC shall use reasonable efforts to schedule maintenance and repairs during the summer period. Nothing in this Agreement shall require IRWD to transmit any excess flows to GAP II or the Main Street Pump Station,and IRWD's agreement to transmit such excess flows shall be subject to the conditions set forth in the W WSP Agreement,including the development of an agreement between IRWD and CITY resolving the operational issues related to the Outfall Connection and a reliable replacement source of water for IRWD's duck ponds and the irrigation of the San Joaquin Marsh. Section 5: Outfall Connection Qnerafiniz Cost . (a) Pumping Costs. At the end of each winter period,CSDOC will estimate the cost per gallon of pumping reclaimed water flows from the Outfail Connection into the CSDOC outfall,using actual costs for operation and maintenance of the outfall facilities for the previous 4 12 months,and will compute the total pumping cost for such winter period using the information generated by OCWD pursuant to Section 7 hereof. IRWD and CITY shall share the annual pumping cost equally. (b) Cpital and Qperafing Costs for Excess Flows. County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County("CSD 14")has entered into an agreement with County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3, 5,6,7, 11 and 13 of Orange County,for the acquisition by CSD 14 of capacity in the treatment,disposal and sewer facilities of CSDOC,and IRWD has entered into an agreement with CSD 14 to fund,from time to time,as necessary, CSD 14's share of the CSDOC capital expenditures and operation and maintenance costs. The excess reclaimed water flows delivered to the Outfall Connection shall be excluded from the quantity calculations of CSD 14's flows for purposes of determining CSD 14's share of the CSDOC capital expenditures and operation and maintenance costs. Any excess reclaimed water flows diverted to the Main Street Pump Station during shutdown of the Outfall Connection shall be excluded from the quantity calculations of CSD 14's flows for purposes of determining CSD 14's share of the CSDOC capital expenditures. For this purpose,the amount of any excess reclaimed water flows diverted to the Main Street Pump Station shall be computed by determining the flow metered through MPS-3 pump at MWRP during the period of the diversion and subtracting all MWRP side stream flows during such period. Section Duration of 4.6 MGD Flow Commitment to GAP Ii. The parties agree that the October 1 commencement date and March 31 cessation date set forth in the W WSP Agreement with respect to the 4.6 million gallon per day(MGD)flow to be transmitted by IRWD to GAP II shall be subject to modification for each winter period as follows: 5 _ 1 (a) Commencement IRWD shall provide OCWD and CSDOC with oral and written notification at least one(1)week prior to the scheduled date of commencing flow to GAP II for the winter period. IRWD may schedule such commencement on any date between October 1 and November 30,at its sole discretion. Commencement of flow prior to October 1 or after November 30 will require OCWD's written approval. (b) Cessation. IRWD shall provide OCWD and CSDOC with oral and written notification at least two(2)weeks prior to the scheduled date of cessation of flow to GAP II for the winter period. IRWD may schedule such cessation on any date between March 31 and April 30,at its sole discretion. Cessation of flow prior to March 31 or after April 30 will require OCWD's written approval. Section 7: Determination of Flow Delivered. OCWD's payment to IRWD for the 4.6 MGD minimum flow of reclaimed water pursuant to the W WSP Agreement shall be based on the quantity determined by aggregating the total amount of reclaimed water delivered by IRWD to GAP II for the winter period(as metered at University Drive)and subtracting any excess flow metered into the Outfall Connection. Delivery of the 4.6 MGD minimum flow during each winter period shall be determined by dividing the resulting aggregate flow by the total number of days that the Intertie operated during the winter period. Section 8: Reporting. IRWD shall provide OCWD and CSDOC with a monthly report for each calendar month during the winter operation period for the Intertie,by the thirtieth (30th) day of the following month. Such monthly reports shall include the following information: (a) Water Quality Dates Final effluent water quality data from MWRP,including,at 6 minimum,the daily results for colifomi, electrical conductivity (maximum,minimum and average for each day)and chlorine residual(maximum,minimum and average for each day), and monthly sampling results for total dissolved solids,pH,carbonate,bicarbonate,calcium, magnesium,boron,chloride,sodium,calculated sodium adsorption ratio(SAR)and adjusted SAR- Results for other constituents that are routinely measured in the final effluent shall also be included. The report shall include the dates of sample collection and units used for reporting. (b) Meter Readings. Daily readings,in both acre feet and gallons, of the quantity of water delivered through the Interde meter on University Drive and the quantity of excess flow delivered through the Outfall Connection meter. Section 9: Notices. Any notice or other document and all billings and payments required or permitted to be given by either party hereto to the other party shall be deemed received upon delivery in person to the recipient or upon deposit in the United States mail in the State of California,with postage prepaid and addressed to the party for whom intended at the following address: To CSDOC: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attn: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations Telephone: (714)962-2411 E-mail: rooten@csdoc.org To OCWD: For invoices: Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 20845 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-0845 Attn: Accounts Payable 7 For all other notices: Orange County Water District 10500 Ellis Avenue P.O.Box 8300 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8300 Attn: Steven R. Conklin,P.E., Associate General Manager To CITY: City of Newport Beach Public Works Department-Utilities 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O.Box 1768 Newport Beach,CA 92658-8915 To IRWD: Irvine Ranch Water District 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue P.O.Box 57000 Irvine,CA 92619-7000 Attention: John White,Director of Plant Operations Section 1' 0 ISM. The term of this Agreement shall expire at the end of the fifteen year period described in Section l(C)(2)of the W WSP Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,this Agreement has been executed in the names of the respective parties by their duly authorized officers, effective as of the day and year first above written. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,for itself and on behalf of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS.2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13 and 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman,Board of Directors By Secretary,Board of Directors 8 APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L.WOODRUFF, GENERAL COUNSEL,CSDOC By CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH By Mayor By City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By City Attorney IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT By General Manager By Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: BOWIE,ARNESON,KADL WILES & GIANNONE By ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT By President By General Manager 9 APPROVED AS TO FORM: By_ General Counsel 70/4101 / 021018 10 County Sanitation Districts j of Orange County,California P. O. Box 8127 • 108" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE JOINT STEERING/AD HOC COMMITTEE Wednesday, February 25, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee and the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, February 25, 1998, at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE OTHERS PRESENT: PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff,General Counsel John J.Collins,Joint Chairman Norm Eckenrode, Chair,District 2 Peer A. Swan,Vice Joint Chairman Thomas M.Dawes,Consultant George Brown, Chair,FAHR Kelli-BumLucht,Consultant Burnie Dunlap,Chair, PDC Pat McGuigan,Chair, OMTS STAFF PRESENT: Bill Steiner, Director/Supervisor Donald F. McIntyre,General Manager Blake P.Anderson,Assistant General Manager AD HOC COMMITTEE PRESENT: Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary John J.Collins,Joint Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Peer A Swan,Vice Joint Chairman Administration George Brown,Chair, FAHR Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Jan Debay,Chair, District 5 David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Shirley Dettloff,Chair, District 11 Jim Herberg, Planning Supervisor Pat McGuigan,Chair,OMITS Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Bill Steiner, Director/Supervisor ABSENT: None APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. 9 ' Minutes of the Joint Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting ('- Page 2 February 25, 1998 RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION: Receive, file and approve draft minutes of the January 28, 1998 Steering Committee meeting. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN Joint Chairman Collins stated that on July 1 we will be entering new era, and at that time he would like to propose a resolution approving ten meetings per month, an increase over the six per month now in force. This would be the same as the Orange County Water District. Because of the number of items that will have to be addressed at the first meeting of the Consolidated Districts, The rescheduling of the OMTS meetings was discussed, Director McGuigan, Chair of OMITS, indicated that the agenda could be kept at a minimum for that meeting, or it could start earlier. No decision was reached. The March 14 Directors Workshop has been cancelled. All other workshops have also been cancelled because of changes in CDM's scope of work. This will be announced at the Board meeting. Chairman Collins indicated that the meeting notice in the agenda for the February meeting does not reflect the meeting schedule changes in July. This will be brought to the attention of the Board Secretary. It will also be announced at tonight's meeting. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Don McIntyre stated that a presentation on the latest rain storms would be made at tonight's Board meeting. He also announced that the hearing on the EPA waiver will be held at the City Hall in Newport Beach on March 6. Garden Grove has submitted a letter for consideration. Copies were also sent to each Director at their respective city halls. They are asking for increased citizen involvement, and the impact of increased rates on businesses. The letter will be considered by the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan before going to the Joint Boards. Chairman Collins indicated that he will invite Bruce Broadwater, Mayor of Garden Grove, to the Ad Hoc Committee meeting. Tentatively scheduled for March 19, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Staff has suggested that, in an effort to reduce the number of meetings involving the Directors, rather than having workshops on Saturdays, there could be one-hour-or-more study sessions before the regular Board meeting. After some discussion, it was decided to continue with the Saturday workshops. The Chairman then suggested that a poll of the Directors be taken at tonight's meeting to get an idea on revising the start time to 6:30, 7 or remain at 7:30 p.m. Michelle Tuchman will prepare the survey and include it in the Directors' meeting folders. The General Manager also requested that an additional discussion item on the federal Clean Water Initiative be included on the agenda. This was approved. Minutes of the Joint Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting j Page 3 February 25, 1998 REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL There is an OCIP meeting scheduled on March 3 to discuss the bankruptcy. An agreement has been reached with the North County Community College District. Mr. Woodruff also mentioned that at the beginning of the bankruptcy a firm was hired to assist the pool participants, but their services were never required. They have now been requested to represent Peak Marwick and are asking if the Districts has any potential conflict with this. The Steering Committee members did not express any concems. There has been a request by FNMA and the county for production of documents. The request was very broad, and counsel has managed to reduce the number of documents that must be provided. It will take a lot of staff time to compile these documents. The Montrose case was discussed. Unfortunately, the Districts is one of two agencies (along with the City of Los Angeles) that have been required to produce records, upwards of 50,000 documents. In an effort to keep costs down, the judge ruled that the Districts would receive 15 cents per page, and that we can petition the court for cost recovery. Mr. Woodruff also updated the Committee on the PennWilson rase. A law suit has been filed and service was effected. It was also learned that 'the Districts' compressor has been removed from the manufacturer's facilities. Meetings are ongoing with OCERS attorneys on the deferred comp issue. This will be continued to March. DISCUSSION ITEMS Steering Committee Items Discussion Items: 1. Proposed 800 megahertz lease with the County of Orange. The status of the County of Orange 800 megahertz facility at Plant 2 was discussed. Ed Hodges indicated that he had reached agreement with a representative of the County, only to be told by others in the County GSA office that the representative was a consultant and did not have authority to negotiate for them, and that he no longer worked for the County. Any terms must be approved the Governance Committee. The County made a counter offer which Mr. Hodges is unwilling to accept. As a result, he will be requesting that the item be pulled from the Joint Board agenda, and added to the OMTS Committee agenda for March. Mr. McIntyre indicated that the County has leases for other sites for these facilities, and they range was from no cost to $4200. The terms were discussed further, and Mr. Hodges received direction for future negotiations. 2. Review Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in March (Information item only) Minutes of the Joint Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting t Page 4 February 25, 1998 REPORT OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN CHAIRMAN Chairman Brown did not have make a report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Blake Anderson and Nancy Wheatley discussed key points of the federal Clean Water Action Plan that has been proposed by President Clinton. It is a major contrast to the original Clean Water Act in that it stresses cooperative projects and less command and control. It advocates what this agency has been working towards, on the the regional and national levels. A ten-page overview of the plan has been inserted in the Directors folders for tonight's Board meeting. Mr. McIntyre indicated that staff will be reporting to the Steering Committee on other issues included in the Plan and how they may impact this agency. Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Discussion Items: 3. Update Joint CSDOC/GWR System, Phase II Public Information Program and Schedule Michelle Tuchman updated the members of the committees on the business, government and community outreach programs, including the meetings that have been held and those that are scheduled. Phase II will continue to work on gaining public support and will involve more staff support. Phase III will address the construction phase of the GWR System program. Six key audiences have been addressed. An outline of proposed activities in the outreach plan has been prepared. The consultants are now in a support role, rather than the lead. 4. Discussion on Strategic Plan Cooperative Project Proposals Mr. Dawes discussed the cooperative projects that are proposed for water reclamation, conservation and I&I programs. The Strategic Plan is addressing issues that have never been considered, as well as trying to find ways to make improvements. However, without the cooperative projects, some of the problems cannot be solved. The Committee members discussed the cooperative projects, including defining a cost- sharing formula, and flexibility. Action Item: Staff to identify where the problems are the worst, do a pilot project to figure out a base cost and then develop an overall list of projects with associated cost breakdowns. The current I&I program has 60 meters placed throughout the Districts, and specifically in areas that have problems. Forty of the meters are for infiltration and the other 20 are for inflow. This is not part of the Strategic Plan but will be used to refine the Strategic Plan recommendations. Director Dettloff said that the cities are looking for cooperative projects, and that they would benefit bath agencies. They would also make the cities aware of the broader issues. She stated that the City of Huntington Beach is extremely interested in this program. Blake Anderson indicated that all of the cities need to recognize the problems associated with aging sewer systems, and the majority of the sewers are aging. 4 Minutes of the Joint Steering/Ad Hoc Committees Meeting y Page 5 February 25, 1998 Director Dunlap indicated that a clear vision of the service area system needs to be prepared and then provide incentives to make corrections. Staff should also explore a cooperative system building for the future. Director McGuigan slated that the cities will either be paying now or later. Director Brown indicated that it may be better to go through the Districts. Nancy Wheatley stated that from her experience on the East Coast, cities are more likely to accept these projects if shared funding is available. Ed Hodges indicated that staff has interviewed all the cities in the service area and found that there are no standards for maintenance. He explained some of the things that are now being done, including considering maintenance contracts with the cities. CLOSED SESSION The General Manager's performance evaluation, scheduled to be considered during the closed session, was deferred. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Al the April OMTS Committee meeting, Ed Hodges will prepare status report on rapacity in the major trunk lines to help determine the storage capacity of the system. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for March 25, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m. Sit mitted by: J a -Tappan, Stee ng ommittee Secretary CdlepenEa\STEERING COMNRiEF1�9YE MmNey MC County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728.8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY. MARCH 4. 1998 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on March 4, 1998, at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Chris Dahl, Director of Information Technology John Collins, Joint Chair Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Bob Oaten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Don Bankhead Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Margie L. Rice Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Charles E. Sylvia Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Mike Moore, ECM Manager Absent Sam Mowbray, Laboratory Manager Dan Tremblay, Laboratory Supervisor Steve Anderson Henry Salgado, Sr. Laboratory Analyst John E. Noyes Tony Pira, LIMS Specialist Dave Sullivan Mike White, Controller Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialist Pat Magnante, Committee Secretary Frankie Woodside, Alternate Secretary Others Present: Representatives from: Carollo (1) Tule Ranch (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Y Page 2 March 4, 1998 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the February 4, 1998 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as corrected. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Introductions were made. No report given. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Don McIntyre reported on the following items: • Ongoing negotiations for the 800 MHZ lease agreement are changing as we speak. A copy of the letter that was faxed to us today was distributed to you. • IRWD negotiations are ongoing with respect to managing peaks. Bob Ooten will talk about this in his report tonight. • Tom Woodruff, Gary Streed and I met with Mr. Lockhart, the man who spoke to the full Board the other night, about his concerns regarding the new ordinance. Our attempt to negotiate a compromise was unsuccessful. We will discuss this at the full Board meeting this month. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER No report was given. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (Hodges) Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, reported on the followed items: • At last month's Board meeting Bob Ooten talked about a problem we have as a result of the El Nino conditions in the city of Santa Ana. This is a situation where we have never before seen a problem in this area. On February 26, we televised (TV'd) some lines in Santa Ana in conjunction with staff from the City of Santa Ana. A map of the areas we looked at was included in your handouts. This area is bordered by Warner and Edinger and by Bristol and Main Street and it is primarily a residential area. The line is an 8-inch VCP and drains into the Bristol trunk and then to the Santa Ana trunk and then to the Sunflower trunk to the plant. The camera was pulled through the 8-inch line by a cable. It showed sags, offset joints, grease, deposits and cracks. A portion of the televised footage was shown to the Directors. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 March 4, 1998 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY(Dahl) Chris Dahl reported that his scheduled slide presentation on automation was pulled and rescheduled for the April meeting. There will be an overview on office and plant computerization plans including the J-42 project. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (Ooten) Bob Ooten reported on the following items: • The four-month term for fixed natural gas prices has concluded. An accurate reporting of the costs for this four-month period will be provided next month. • The facilities have operated through seven major storms with no beach closures and in complete compliance. In February, the 30-day average flow went up from 240 mgd at the beginning of the month to 280 mgd at the end of the month due to the inflow on the day of the storm from six storms and the infiltration to the sewers as the ground became saturated. Increased flow has had an impact on treatment performance and wet grounds has had an impact on solids disposal. We are actively meeting with IRWD staff to manage peak flows better. We would like to develop a short-term (one year) agreement that will achieve our objective. IRWD is now sending us clean water and raw sewage. Normally during this time of the year they send us all raw sewage. Charges to IRWD are being reviewed in consideration of the clean water we are receiving. Handouts were provided to detail the current flow situation. O&M Monthly Report Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report: A report for the month of January is submitted to the OMITS Committee for review. This report focuses on compliance, safety, financial data and performance measures for O & M and is intended to provide Committee members with information on a timely basis. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Nancy J. Wheatley reported on the following items: • Meeting with the Singapore Ambassador on Monday, March 16, 1998. • 1997 Marine Monitoring Report-The differences between the 1996 and 1997 reports were detailed in the Executive Summary section. The main highlights are: 1) a decrease in contaminants in sediments, 2) animals and plants that live near the outfall continue to improve, 3) the number of fish in the water is declining but this is consistent with what is found throughout the Southern Calrfomia waters, and 4)the occurrence of fish disease remains rare. �J Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 March 4, 1998 • Permit Status-The hearing is on Friday, March 6. Only one comment letter was received from Surfriders. We had to get sign off from the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service with respect to endangered species and impacts on endangered species. The vote by the Coastal Commission will be held on March 10. We expect a favorable recommendation. The only way we would not get a favorable recommendation is if someone came in and pointed out some hole in what the EPA has done. The EPA Regional Board staff should get credit for all of the work they have done. It is expected that the permit will be signed at the end of the month. It will become effective 33 days from the date of signing. • The Anaheim Community Development Department held an Expo in Anaheim called, "Powerful Partnerships for Business" on February 26, 1998. It was a program to bring businesses in and explain what it takes to do business in Anaheim. The Source Control division participated in this event. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. DISCUSSION ITEM(SI 1. OMTS98-005 MULTI-AGENCY WATER USE EFFICIENCY PROGRAM. Moll Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to approve funding of$78,400(five percent)for a Multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program costing a total of$1,568,300.00. 2. OMTS98-006 800 MHZ LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE.. Motion: To be submitted to the FAHR Committee on March 11, 1998. 3. OMTS98-007 LEASE AGREEMENT WITH VILLAGE NURSERIES, SPECIFICATION P-180. Motion: Continued to the next OMTS Committee meeting on April 1, 1998. w Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 March 4, 1998 4. OMTS98-008 OUT-OF-COUNTRY TRAVEL REQUEST TO VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA. Motion: Motioned, seconded and carried 2 to approve out-of-country travel by Moyasar Yahya and to approve estimated expenses of$2,317. Directors Rice and Swan opposed the motion. 5. OMTS98-009 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT. Motion, Information only. 6. OMTS98-010 OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM -STRATEGIC PROCESS STUDIES. Motion: Information only. 7. OMTS98-011 LABORATORY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LIMS) IMPLEMENTATION STATUS. Motion: Information only. 8. OMTS98-012 CONSIDERATION OF BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS, FISCAL POLICY STATEMENTS, AND BUDGET CALENDAR FOR PREPARATION OF THE FY98/99 BUDGET. Motion: Information only. This report was submitted to the FAHR Committee for approval on 2/11/98. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance } and Technical Services Committee �! Page 6 March 4, 1998 OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY No other business. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Director Swan requested that a report on sewer trunkline capacities be presented at the April or May OMTS meeting. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for April 1, 1998 at the Districts'Administrative Offices. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Submitted by: �,r�1'.d L4X42 � Patricia J. Ma ante Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary H'%WP.DTAIOMIBIONIAGNANTE%OMTS G-1N1AR98NIIN 0398.WPD OMTS COMMITTEE MeebngDate Tox.eds. 3/4/98 3/25/98 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number 7ckNurfber OMr598-005 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations Originator: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations W'IV SUBJECT: MULTI-AGENCY WATER USE EFFICIENCY PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an agreement with Metropolitan Water District of Orange County (MWDOC)for a multi-agency water use efficiency program providing for installation of ultra low flow toilets, shower heads and sink aerators for an amount not to exceed $78,400.00 to be matched by MWDOC with a balance to be funded by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for a total program cast of$1,568,300.00. SUMMARY The Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) has been granted funds from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and Metropolitan Water District for the installation of ultra-low flow toilets, low flow shower heads and low flow sink aerators throughout Orange County in apartments and condominiums or other multi-family dwellings. Multi- family distribution was selected due to the tight schedule for installation the devices. In order to secure the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation funding, local matching funds need to be secured. MWDOC has requested that CSDOC provide half of the matching funds needed ($156,800) since half of the devices will be installed in the CSDOC service area. The potential savings in flow from the program in the Districts' service area is 488,000 gallons (0.488 mgd). The annual savings for the Districts from the installation of the devices is projected to be $55,144 annually. Based on our contribution and our cost savings, the program payback is 1.42 years. The savings estimate is based on data from the CDM Strategic Plan report on water conservation that estimates the Districts will save capital and energy costs at the rate of$0.113/gallon of water conserved. This program will be distributing free to participants. Installation costs will be borne by the owner, association or receiver of the device. A contractor will be assigned to handle the CSDOC service area and will be responsible for getting the devices installed and for collecting the used facilities to be returned for recycling. The MWDOC Water Efficiency Program memorandum requesting funding is attached for review. X\wpdelepenpe\OMTSI�lNBeMeaegNeNluXrapoMy Wels Ilse EMiueMy P,opam bx flenmG tlla98 Page 1 ROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total estimated cost of the Multi-agency Water Efficiency Program is $78,400.00. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Using the CDM Strategic Planning Report on Water Conservation, CSDOC can pay up to $29.00 per toilet and save or come out equal on Capital and O&M costs. The MWDOC request for monetary support is for approximately $9.00ftoilet from CSDOC. No funds were budgeted this year. The saving is approximately 0.488 mgd. Program will be implemented by September 1998. ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Municipal Water District of Orange County memorandum. RJO:pjm H by.ElEM�nENpAISI W T<pv W RTnUNIMipscY YMs Ux ERnw',t/Prgin W c R� mwe Page 2 0 To: Bob Ooten From: Joe Berg CSDOC Water Use Efficiency Programs Manager Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) Water Use Efficiency Program Mid-Year Funding Request— MWDOC has been granted approximately $283,000 in U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR)funding for a Mufti-family Ultra-Low-Flush Toilet Retrofit Program on behalf of its member agencies. In order to qualify for this funding, USBR requires funding recipients to contribute 10% of the total program cost as a local contribution. Metropolitan funding is also available on a flat rate per retrofit device at $60 per ULF toilet, $5 for low-flow showerhead and $1 per aerator. Staff anticipates that approximately 17,500 multi-family ULF toilets, 13,000 low-flow showerheads and 13,000 low-flow aerators would be distributed through this program. Half of the toilets, showerheads and aerators would be installed in the CSDOC service area. Water savings are estimated at 10,025 acre-feet over the fife of the plumbing devices. The estimated funding breakdown is as follows: Proposed Program Funding Breakdown: Funding Source: Amount: Percentage: Cost Per Acre Foot: Metropolitan $1,128,500 72% $112 USBR $ 283,000 18% $ 28 MWDOC $ 78,400 5% $ 8 CSDOC $ 78,400 5% $ 8 $1,568,300 100% $156 Assuming 50% or 8,750 ULF toilet, showerhead and sink aerator retrofits in the CSDOC service area, the CSDOC contribution would be $78,400 or $9 per ULF toilet retrofit. CSDOC could choose to participate at a higher or lower level. MWDOC will match the CSDOC funding, hire the contractor, facilitate the grant funding and administer the project. It should be noted that if the local 10% or $156,800 contribution cannot be provided, the USBR funding will be forfeited. In addition, the program must be completed by September 1998 due to the term of the Metropolitan/USBR funding agreement. MWDOC will be requesting Board authorization to implement the project in March for an April 1998 start. OMTS COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT M2COR[f ro n.a9. 3/9/98 3/25/9a I N COUO(y Sanitation Distracts of Orange County, Cahfomia o�BA mbe 7 Nbe' "� FROM: Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Originator: Moyasar Yahya, Scientist SUBJECT: OUT-OF-COUNTRY TRAVEL REQUEST TO VANCOUVER. BC, CANADA GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve out-of-country travel by Moyasar Yahya; 2) Approve payment of registration fee and travel expenses for an estimated total amount of$2,317 for the International Symposium-Health Related Water Microbiology to be held in Vancouver, BC, Canada. SUMMARY Moyasar Yahya, a Scientist in the Environmental Sciences Laboratory, has prepared a scientific paper that has been accepted for poster presentation at the International Symposium-Health Related Water Microbiology to be held in Vancouver, BC, Canada June 21-26, 1998. Mr. Yahya has requested that the Districts authorize his attendance at the symposium and pay $650 registration fee and $1667 for travel-related expenses. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total estimated cost of registration fee, airfare, and per diem expenses is $2,317. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:Training) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The Environmental Sciences Laboratory has sufficient funds in the training budget for FY 97-98 to cover the cost of this request. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Mr. Yahya requests that the Districts authorize his attendance at the International Symposium-Health Related Water Microbiology to be held in Vancouver, BC, Canada, and present a paper entitled "Survival of Wastewater Microorganisms in \YMviYMalW NaW,yMaIOMTAI5 geMReFoFI OOT--OF LOUMRY Ox R.eoaE 1. Page 1 Seawater." This paper is based on the results of studies conducted by the Microbiology staff to evaluate the die-off rate of wastewater bacteria and viruses in seawater. Mr. Yahya will participate in some of the symposium sessions that cover issues of interest to the Districts. He will bring back information on critical topics such as advanced methods for the detection of indicator microorganisms from Water and wastewater, environmental monitoring, coastal pollution, wastewater disinfection and reclamation, regulations and risk analysis. ALTERNATIVES No action CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS OMTS Committee: Joint Boards: 1. Copy of the conference announcement c aaawrt.p„w o,.,n.oemwursw.as�. as an Rmee t5gp Page 2 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM HEALTH-RELATED WATER MICROBIOLOGY 21-26 June T998 Vancouver,Caoadn BACKGROUND This is the ninth meeting of the Specialist Group on Health-Related Water Microbiology. Previous swunars/symposu were held in:Pretoria(1982), Amsmrdam Milthoven(1994),Rio de Janeiro(1996),Brighton(1988),Tubingen(1990).Washington DC(1992),Budapest(1994) and Mallorca(1996). Except for the Tubingen and Mallorca symposia, The events formed part of bicmtial IAWQ conferences. Proceedings of all the meetings have been published in Witter Science and Technology. These semiruNsymposm have steadily been growing in content,attendance and status. They are now established as a high level international platform of knowledge,expertise and progress in the rapidly developing field of health-related water microbiology. The Vancouver Symposium will be held as put of the 1998 Biennial IAWQ Conference. Compared to separate symposia which have distinctive attractions of their own, this offers the opportunity to meet colleagues in related areas of interest, and to assess the role of health- Maim water microbiology in the broader context of the water industry. The IAWQ Biennial Conference is due to pay special attention to practical aspects of the industry,and every effort will be made Is aurae pracu mmrs to special sessions at the conference. This offers attractive opportunities to those who specialise in the field of health-related water microbiology because practitioners are the end users of their business. OBJECTIVES The Symposium will deal with all aspects of health-related water microbiology. This includes vimsa, bacteria, protarm, fungi and algae, as well as indicator organisms, which are associated with the health of man and animals. In terms of fundamental objectives of the Specialist Group and the IAWQ, the intention is to deign a programme for addressing in realistic perspective the problems.challenges,expertise and research needs in countries at all levels of development world-wide. WHO SHOULD ATTEND All thaw involved or interested in the following and associated aspects of health-related water microbiology: research, analytical services, quality control, teaching, health risk or impact assessment,public health, management, planning, legislation, and mostment or disinfection processes. PROGRAMME ON papers and poster presentations on the following are invited: • The recovery of health-celsim micro-organisms from water, wastewater, sludge, sediments,and shellfish. • The detection of hesBh-related imam-organisms by,for romance, molecular techniques, new,cell culture systems,immunological techniques,electron microscopy,etc. Incidence and behaviour of health-related micro-organisms (pathogens and related indicators)in water,wastewater,sludge, sediments,and shellfish. The efficiency of treatment and disinfection procesu:s. • Epidemiology of infectious diseases associated with water(drinking ware,and water- used for recreation, irrigation,aquacolture and mariculmre)and related foods such as shellfish. Risk assessment with regard to water and related food. • Health burden and socioeconomic impact of waterborne and related diseases. Quality criteria,standards,guidelines and policies. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 9272"127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, March 5. 1998 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3, 5,6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on March 5, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present: Staff Present: Bumie Dunlap, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John Collins, Joint Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Shirley Dettloff, Vice Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Brian Donahue Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Mary Ann Jones Bob Ooten, Dir. of Operations & Maintenance Patsy Marshall Nancy Wheatley, Dir. of Technical Services Eva Miner-Bradford Mike White, Controller Christina Shea Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor Jim Harris, Principal Engineering Associate Absent Others: Todd Spitzer Bob Zemel Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the February 5, 1998 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. �J Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 2 March 5, 1998 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager advised that a videotape of the inside of a sewer line showing rainwater infiltration would be presented. The General Manager advised of a meeting with Mr. Lockhart, who spoke at the February Board Meeting about the new ordinance concerning refunds. The General Manager said that litigation is likely on this matter. The General Manager asked Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, to update the Committee on the most recent communications with respect to the EPA Discharge Permit, and the letter that was received. The Director of Technical Services spoke regarding a recent letter from Heal the Bay commenting on the draft Ocean Discharge Permit. She advised that EPA will need to prepare a response to all of the issues raised in Heal the Bays letter. She further advised that the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) may decide to not vole on our permit as scheduled tomorrow morning because of some specific issues raised by the letter which must be answered by EPA. The next step in the process is the Coastal Commission hearing scheduled for Tuesday. The Coastal Commission's action is going to be fairly simple because it is premised on the RWQCB having concluded that our peril is consistent with the State requirements. If there is no vole tomorrow, it is probable that the Coastal Commission will delay their action until after the Regional Board has acted. We will know tomorrow by 10:00 a.m. The General Manager also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that an additional item could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2) upon a two-thirds' vote of the Committee members. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. It was moved, second, and duly carried to: 1) Find that the matter arose subsequent to posting of the agenda pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); 2)That approval of Change Order Number 3, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid)with Air Pol regarding purchase of a new CNG Compressor, be added to the agenda for discussion and action. The General Manager introduced Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor, who gave an update on this winters wet weather inflow and infiltration studies. He reviewed some preliminary flow data collected in February and presented some closed-circuit television video showing groundwater infiltration into a City of Santa Ana sewer. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager was not present. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 3 March 5, 1998 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering asked the Committee to provide their E-mail address on the colored sheet provided. The Director of Engineering advised that with the Delegation of Authority Resolution, we increased the General Manager's authority for change order approval to$50,000 per change order, and $100,000 cumulative maximum. What wasn't addressed specifically in the resolution was the issue of time extensions and whether or not Committee approval would be required for all time extensions. The Committee advised they would like to have the time to deliberate on this Issue. It was agreed this item would be placed on the agenda for the April meeting. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. CHANGE ORDER REPORTS Information Only Item. The Construction Manager handed out a table regarding projects with change orders expected to exceed 5%. There were some changes from last month. The Construction Manager advised that the first item will be discussed later asking for preapproval for a change order to the Compressed Natural Gas Facility and the Refueling Station, and the amount of that change order is expected to be at 46%. The other three items on the report have not changed. One item was dropped because we expected an 8% maximum change order on that job and it now appears it will be less than 5%. It was advised this table would be brought to the Committee every month, with applicable changes. INFORMATIONAL ITEM (Item No. 1) 1. FAHR98-13: Information item only. Approve the 1998-99 Budget Assumptions, Fiscal Policy Statements, and Budget Calendar, and direct staff to prepare the 1998-99 budget Incorporating these parameters. Mike White, Controller, gave a presentation of the budget process at the Districts, the fiscal policy guidelines, and budget assumptions. This is an overview of the major policy issues that support the budget that is in preparation. It is also to inform the Committee members in the beginning of the budget process of basic assumptions involved in the budget preparation to ensure that we are going in the right direction. The 1998-99 Budget will be submitted to the Committees and Board in June 1998. 1 Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 4 March 5, 1998 ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 2-4) 2. PDC98-05: Accept Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-33-2, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the final Closeout Agreement with Pascal & Ludwig. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. 3. PDC98-06: Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifies 3, 4, and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, at al with Margate Construction, Inc. for an addition of$97,426, and 26 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $8,792,085. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. 4. PDC98-07: Approve Addendum No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement, Job No. J-31, with CH2M Hill, Inc. for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control System Upgrade at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 for a reduced amount of$312,067, decreasing the total not-to- exceed contract amount to $2,244,570. . MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS, OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY 5. PDC98-08: Approve Change Order No. 3 to Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Facility at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid),with Air Pol for an addition of$295,000 increasing the total contract amount to $971,244. The Director of Engineering advised that there is no Agenda Report for this item, but a full Agenda Report will be included in the March 25, 1998 Joint Boards' Meeting package. Specifically, there has been a breach of the existing contract with PennWilson CNG for failure to deliver the gas compressor unit manufactured by them. As a result, there is now a need for the Districts to purchase the equipment from an alternate contractor. Informal discussions have been undertaken with Air Pol, the contractor hired to install the equipment, for purposes of manufacturing a gas compressor unit as well. A change order in the amount of$295,000 would be required, to include the purchase of the equipment and the additional installation costs in the amount of$43,000. A further time extension of 400 days, associated with the delay, is also requested, without the charge of extended overhead or costs pursuant to that time extension being requested by the contractor. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval of the change order and refer to the Joint Boards on March 25, 1998. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 5 March 5, 1998 MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday, Apri12, 1998. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Submitted by:C ail Cain Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Secretary Hn OTA�Ncmoc TEBiww.wao PDC COMMITTEE MeefingMe TORBtls. 3/5198 3/25/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Numtr ItemNumMr PDC98-05 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Morris Ying, Project Manager SUBJECT: CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT FOR MAIN SEWAGE PUMP (MSP) AT HEADWORKS NO. 2 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-33-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Accept Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-33-2 as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the final closeout agreement with Pascal & Ludwig. SUMMARY In 1988, Project P1-20 included the installation of Pump No. 3, designated as a future unit. The pump was installed without any drive system. Job No. J-33-2 involves the installation of an electrical soft-start motor drive system, including a soft motor starter, a motor, and a composite drive shaft, to complete the pump. This project has been completed. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $516,000.00 Total Contract Change Orders $ 0.00 Final Adjusted Amount $516,000.00 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CORE—C.e.d) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS None H1 pdMW,UOfl58 CONTRA6$U-02-Mgenda ReMd Form cw del R_. 111 9 PDC COMMITTEE Memnq Drte ro x.aDS. 3/5/9E 3/25/9E AGENDA REPORT IMM NUMW I IMM W.ber PDC9a-06 1.3 County Sanitation DMdcts of Orange County,California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineerin Originator: Dave Erdkamp, Project Manager SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3, 4, AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-41. ET AL GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5 at Plant No. 1, at al with Margate Construction, Inc. for an addition of$97,426.00 and 26 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $8,792,085.00. SUMMARY Job No. P141, Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4, and 5 at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P2-48, Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, consist of replacement of deteriorated access bridges and other steel framing with new fiberglass components, replacement of sweep motors and automation of the instrumentation and control systems for the clarifiers. Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared the plans and specifications for Job Nos. P1-41 and P2.48. Job No. P1-43, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2 and Job No. P2-50, Seismic Retrofit on non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, consist of seismic anchorage of electrical, mechanical and process control equipment throughout both plants and replacement of deteriorated pipe supports in existing tunnels. Carollo Engineers prepared the plans and specifications for Job Nos. P143 and P2-50. Job No. P144, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P248, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, consist of upgrading the structural connections and foundation anchorage in twenty-four existing buildings throughout both plants. Holmes and Narver prepared the plans and specifications for Job Nos. P1-44 and P2-53-2. SP19950021, Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2 and SP19950059. Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 at Plant No. 1 are small projects designed by Districts' staff. The Construction Contract for these jobs was awarded to Margate Construction Inc. in July 1996. The contract is approximately 68% complete. Change Order No. 5 is an addition to the contract in the amount of$97,426.00 for 2 additional items of additional work. There is a 26 day time extension in this change order. H k"fta ngWM A COMRACTS 1M1A9mda Rapan Fo,m 5 aoMgmda Remn Fwm5 DHElh Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price: $8,461,138. Previously Authorized Changes: $ 231,521. This Change (Add) (Bedw ): $ 97,426. Percentage Increase: 3.90% Amended Contract Price: $8,790,085. Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Modification of Wiring for $88,584. 26 Omission Primary Basins 2 Misc. work at Plant $ 8,842. 0 Omission Waterlrurbine Buildings Total Change Order No. 5 $97,426. 26 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line ilem:CORF—c.a.d) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None. Ratification of staff's actions. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Change Order Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report H1x G *ngVC& 6COM ACTW141Nganda Rspo Fom.5 do ,g +Repao 1orm5 DHE ih Page 2 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT PRIMARY CLARIFIER REHABILITATION AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-41, ET AL APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM TIME TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 7/22/96 $8,461.138.00 $8,461,138 720 720 CO NO. 1 7/23197 ($85,680.00) $ 8,375,458.00 -0.94% 37 757 CO NO. 2 7/30197 $197,299.00 $ 8,572,757.00 1.32% 0 757 CO NO. 3 11/19/97 $93,811.00 $ 8,666,568.00 2.45% 0 757 CO NO. 4 Proposed GM $26,091.00 $ 8,692,659.00 2.80% 0 757 CO No. 5 Proposed $97,426.00 $ 8,790,085.00 3.90% 26 783 H9wp.dlabngle gT141khngstsl5 As BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PRIMARY CLARIFIER REHAB. AT PLANT NO. 2, ET AL JOB NO. P1-41, ET AL CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK (ADOPTED BY AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZED TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO CORF) DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED FUNDS DATE DATE(%) CONSULTANT $3,704,075 $2,959,418 $2,959,418 $2.959,418 100% STAFF $2,800,000 $2,618,706 $2,618,706 $1.718,442 66% CONTRACTOR 311,316,425 $8,487,229 $97,426 $8,584,655 $6.511,711 77% TOTAL $17,820,'00 $14,065,353 $97,426 $14,162,779 $11,189,571 80% H:Wpola@ng�nglP I-0 ko5budtable Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Maroate Construction C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: March 25, 1998 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1 Job No P1-41 7 Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P143: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2.53-27 Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP19950021: and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Beduct) $ 97,426.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. JOB NOS. P141 & P2-48 ITEM 1 - MODIFICATION OF WIRING FOR PRIMARY CLARIFIERS D THROUGH Q AND 3 THROUGH 5 This item of work represents costs to modify the seventeen basin's electrical wiring. The modifications include resolving conflicts at the sections between cable tray and conduit. Also included are other changes in the motor control center rooms. The contract plans specify that the existing sleeves be reused for the installation of new branch circuit conductors. The specified cable tray wiring would not fit in the existing conduits which were specified to be reused. It was determined to be more cost efficient to use a different installation method to accommodate the existing conditions. In order to make use of the existing openings in the concrete walls and roof decks it was necessary to install new NEMA-4X fiberglass boxes to splice the tray cables to conduit wiring. This additional work would have been included in the original contract had this problem been known. During the design phase the District's Consultants did not have access to the inside portions of the motor control panels. During the construction phase it was found that the existing conditions did not match the "as-built" records. The original design was completed using 'as-built" records. The actual work on one basin was performed to determine the scope of the necessary changes. Since the additional work is typical to all seventeen basins the Districts negotiated the costs for all of the work inclusive. This equates to a cost of approximately$5,211.00 per basin. This Rem was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with the General Provisions, Section 10-6 (B) (2) (a). Reference: Plan Change Order No. 10. (P1-41 - 17.6% - 122-48- 82.4%) COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 88,584.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 26 Calendar Days Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: March 25, 1998 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-41: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-43: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2.48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No. 122-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP19950021: and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059 JOB NO. P2-53-2 ITEM NO. 2 - MISCELLANEOUS WORK AT PLANT WATER PUMP STATION AND TURBINE GENERATOR BUILDING. This item of work includes two portions of additional work. The first portion of this work includes installation of 3/4-inch steel filler plates between the existing wide flange steel room beams and new seismic wall brackets in the Plant Water Pump Station at Plant No. 2. The existing steel beam seat plates extended past the wall surface and created conflicts with the welding of the new steel wall brackets to existing beam flange. It was necessary to install these new filler plates approximately thirty-feet above the existing floor. The additional work included costs for scaffolding, welding and painting. The second portion of the additional work at the Turbine Generator Building involved modifications to an existing muffler support bracket. This existing muffler support bracket which was not shown on the contract as built drawings conflicted with the new contract specified cross brackets and was modified to fit. This hem was performed by force account by the Contractor in accordance with the General Provisions Section 10.6(B)2(b). Reference FCO Nos. 26 and 27. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,842.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 97,426.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 26 Calendar Days Page 3 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: Five (5) Dale: March 25, 1998 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-41: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1.44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D throuah O at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billinas Tunnel at Plant No. 2 SP19950021: and Sludge Pioino Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 26 calendar days extension of time is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: July 22, 1996 Original Contract Time: 720 Days Original Completion Date: July 11, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 26 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 63 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 783 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: September 12, 1998 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: September 12, 1998 Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $8,461,138.00 Prev.Authorized Changes $ 231,521.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 97,426.00 Amended Contract Price $ 8,790,085.00 Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: March 25, 1998 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No 2 SP19950021, and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15. SP19950059 Board Authorization Date: March 25, 1998 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Su itt d by: fl z-�3 nst ction Manager Date Approve y: ctor o Engineering Date Accepted by: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE MeennoMe ToXB&. 3/5/98 3/2.5/W AGENDA REPORT IIemMM IM)n Mee Roc99-07 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineers Originator: Jim Harris, Principal Engineering Associate SUBJECT: Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve Addendum No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement, Job No. J-31, with CH2M Hill, Inc. for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control System Upgrade at Plants 1 and 2 for a reduced amount of$312,067, decreasing the total not to exceed contract amount to $2,244,570. SUMMARY The consultant, CH2M Hill, Inc., has requested to be relieved of the software programming required in the Scope of Work. The deleted programming will reduce the value of the Professional Services Agreement by $330,067. The deleted programming will be completed by Districts' staff, at no increase in the total project budget. Additional work requested by Districts' staff will require the consultant to increase their participation in construction support services for the contract. The additional construction support services will increase the amount of the contract by $18,000. Proposed Addendum No. 7 will result in a net reduction of the Professional Services Agreement cost by$312,067. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 690,148 Previously Authorized Changes $1,866,489 This Change (Deduct) $ (312,067) Addenda to Date $1,554,422 Percent Increase 325% Amended PSA Price $2,244,570 G Wg� OlJa waft Re�nS➢DLDSI.J 31=N Mc R«. OW, Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: C(a)a,b,c) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) This proposed addendum will not change the overall budget currently approved by the Boards. The additional costs associated with construction support services are offset by programming cost savings and lower costs to complete construction. The Budget Summary is included in the attached Budget Information Table, and the Contract/Addenda Summary. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. J-31, Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, provided for the design of automated systems that will control process equipment and allow Districts' staff to monitor and modify the operational status of the systems. The consultant is required to provide detailed designs for the installation of the equipment and communications used to control the flow of wastewater, and provide the programming of the computers that control this equipment. The upgrade of various plant process areas has already been completed during this multiyear design and construction effort. The areas that have been completed include the Ocean Ouffall Booster Station and the Influent Flow Monitoring System. Currently under construction is the upgrade of the Headworks at Plant 1, and under design is the upgrade of the oxygen delivery system (OASES), and the Return Activated Sludge/Waste Activated Sludge (RASANAS) pumping stations, both at Plant 2. The consultant has requested that the portion of the work related to the programming of the computers used to monitor and control the processes for the OASES and the RASNVAS pump stations be removed from the contract. The computer programmers that were closely linked to this work have left the employment of CH2M Hill. The consultant does not now have the resources, either in the company or available through subconsultants, to complete the programming of the remaining processes. All remaining work required by the Scope of Work will be completed by the consultant per the requirements of the existing contract. To complete the associated programming, the Districts' Plant Automation Group (PAG) now has computer programmers in place that can finish this work. The PAG have committed the resources to complete this programming effort without impacting the job currently in construction or those still in designs. By completing the programming using Districts' staff, the budget amount that the Professional Services Agreement contract is reduced by ($312,067), will be transferred to staff costs as noted in the attached Budget Information Table. G NIBbOaMBmEa Onll Pepa�i`PpCNS/.JJt U1S9!Erc aM,� ov,ese Page 2 A The Districts commonly use consultants to review shop drawings, requests for Y information, and assist with overall issues that are part of constructing new or modified facilities. Staff uses the consultant's time on an as-needed basis. The Districts' construction staff has noted that the remaining budget for this consultant is not adequate to complete the work related to the current and anticipated future construction needs. There is currently only$1,000.00 budgeted for the completion of the work, which is not adequate. Staff estimates that an additional $18,000.00 will be required to complete the work. ALTERNATIVES No Action. This consultant has expressed that they would request termination of the contract as permitted by the Professional Service Agreement, if this addendum was not approved. The remaining design work could not be completed by in-house resources due to workload. This alternative is not recommended. CEQA FINDINGS This work is categorically exempt by CEQA under Section 15301, Modifications to Existing Facilities. Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Contract/Addenda Summary G Daft R.p WOL1V5R J 310x-0 d. RM,.,, Rz1, Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2 Job No. J-31 a r° n• c ' ORI�iWKL�• CURRENT PROP08ED i;RDPOSED k iFUNDA na ,d ` YMS � � RO A9ED d,w x � ROJECTITASK ADfSPT' 6� P, ECT� b BU6OE7` SE }AUTNORIZEO AUjHORiiATlO `� �T�A.. 3 y U "' P BUDQETv BUDOET 71NCi{ E � B DOE? TO GATE EQUiE3 H 1 G, "9! ira .4'"kF•as6iri9i, a Design $ 750.000 $ 2,600,000 $ 2600000 $ 2,556,637 $ 312067) $ 2.244.570 $ 2117528 81% Staff $ 25.000 $ 2,717 000 $ 2,717,000 $ 2,717,000 $ 312.067 $ 3,029,067 $ 2,500,000 92% Contractor $ 200.000 $ 2,476,700 $ 2476700 $ 1.500.000 $ $ 1,500.000 $ 980,000 40% Materials $ 25,000 $ 1.400.000 $ 1,400.000 $ 1,400,000 $ - $ 1.400,000 $ 1,279,000 91% TOTAL $ 1,000,000 8 9,193,700 $ $ 9,193,700 di.... $ 8,173,637 $ -'. $ 8,173,637 $ 6,876,528 1 75% H.Mp.dto1mrgr¢na W31199Mdd 7 major cosh tebleArs Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-31 Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitors and Control Systems at Plant 1 and 2 Total Project Budget: $9.1 33.700 Consultant: CHM2 Hill, Inc. Start Date of Project: April 14, 1993 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Cost 04/14/93 Original PSA Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring $ 690,148 $ 690,148 and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2. 12/08/93 1 Engineering Studies to Determine Capabilities of $ 52,000 $ 742,148 Existing Computer Systems. 06t08/94 2 Change in Completion Date of Contract. $ 0 $ 742,148 Preparation of Construction Plans and 09/14/94 3 Specifications. PLC Software Configuration $1,318,200 $2,060,348 Programming. Additional Engineering Design Services for the 04/26/95 4 Ocean Outfall Booster Station. $ 57,180 $2,117,528 07/08/96 5 Additional Engineering Services for Updating Graphics. $ 24,900 $2,142,428 02/27/97 6 PLC Mapping Services, Sunflower Pump Station $ 414,209 $2,556,637 Integration Miscellaneous Additional Tasks, Proposed 7 Additional Construction Support Services, Delete ($312,067) $2,244,570 PLC Programming for Jobs J-31-3 and J-31-4. IVsdwWstel W,p.EbWspVOBS S CONTRACTSW-MWI PSA Status RaportAm 0711 M County Sanitation Distncts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue 1� Fountain Valley,CA 9272M127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday, March 11, 1998, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, March 11, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Offices. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: George Brown, Chair Dan McIntyre, General Manager John J. Collins, Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay Gary Streed, Director of Finance Barry Denes Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration Norman Z. Eckenrode Mike Petennan, Director of Human Resources John M. Gullixson Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Mark Leyes Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst Mark A. Murphy Mike White, Controller Thomas R. Saltarelli Steve Kozak, Financial Manager William G. Steiner Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor John Swindler, Information Technology Supervisor Committee Directors Absent : Use Lorey, Human Resources Manager Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Others Present: Other Directors Present: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel None Ron Gatti, Valic Judy Davis, Valic Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 2 S� March 11, 1998 yi APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the February 11, 1998, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER • General Manager Don McIntyre requested that Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, show a videotape taken of a City of Santa Ana sewer line. Mr. Hodges described a sewage spill which occurred in the Santa Ana area a few weeks ago, during one of our recent rain storms. Districts' staff examined our lines to determine if we were the cause, however, no obstructions were found in our lines. With the help of the City of Santa Ana, a contractor was hired to run a camera into the city line and videotape the 8" Gay pipe line, which is approximately 30-35 years old. The area where the city line is located borders Edinger and Warner and Bristol and Maine Streets. The video showed clear water being infiltrated into the sewer line through broken cracks in the pipe. The pipe was also found to be sagging in spots and contained offset joints. Don McIntyre advised that this may be a bigger issue, especially if similar problems exist in many other locations in our service area. He stated that if infiltration and inflow can be mitigated, we would probably reduce our mgd by 50 mgds or more. We are trying to convince the cities that they should be addressing these issues and need to repair their sanitary sewers. As part of the Strategic Plan, the Districts should be prepared to provide matching funds to encourage and help cities deal with these issues. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE • Gary Streed, Director of Finance, identified the documents which were placed before each Director prior to the meeting, which included the Treasurers' Report, revised RAC schedules and colored hand-outs regarding Item No. 9 on the Agenda. • Mr. Streed further advised the Committee that the COP rates are down to 1,05% today. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS • Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman reported that on Thursday, March 26, 1998, there will be a luncheon meeting for City Managers and their Public Works staff. The video presented by Mr. Hodges this evening will be shown at the meeting, and another topic for discussion will be the groundwater replenishment system. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 3 p March 11, 1998 • In today's Times, the Metro Section had a picture of a sign stating, "Beach Closed,"which appeared to look like is in the Districts' service area. Ms. Tuchman said she spoke to the reporter who ran the article and found out she is new to the Times, and did not realize that the location was not in our service area. Michelle spoke to her again and suggested she might like to run another article about whether the beaches would be open over the weekend and reiterate the problem, and suggested she speak to an official at the Health Department for further details. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL • General Counsel updated the Committee regarding the Orange County Employees' Retirement System actions relative to the Ventura decision and its impact on Districts' employees, particularly as it relates to the Districts' Deferred Compensation Program. There was no action by the Districts' Board at their last meeting because of events taking place at OCERS. Mr. Woodruff has had two conferences with OCERS and some issues are still not resolved, however, their goal is for a positive outcome. Mr. Woodruff is expecting a Memorandum of Understanding from them next week. Mr. Woodruff advised he will bring this item back to the FAHR in April. The Committee Chair gave Mr. Woodruff the option of bringing this item to the Joint Boards, if he is prepared to do so by then. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS I1 -31 1. FAHR98-18: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1998, AND FORWARD TO THE JOINT BOARDS: The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. 2. FAHR98-19: Receive and file Certificates Of Participation (COP) Report 3. FAHR98-20: Receive and file Employment Status Report END OF CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 1 through 3 under Consent Calendar. ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 4-6) 4. FAHR98-21: Approve second amendment to County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, Deferred compensation Plan as amended 1994 MOTION: It was moved, seconded and approved, with Director Collins abstaining, to recommend that the Joint Boards approve second amendment to County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, Deferred compensation Plan as amended 1994. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 March 11, 1998 5. FAHR98-22: Receive and file FY 1997/98 Joint Operating Legal Fees Update MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. 6. FAHR98-23: Receive and file the Second Quarter Workers' Compensation and Accident Report for FY 1997/98. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this report. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS 7. FAHR98-24: RAC User Fee Structure Evaluations Mr. Streed updated the Committee on the progress that is being made in revising the Districts' commercial user fee structure. He reviewed some of the work the Rate Advisory Committee has made in this area to expand the number of categories. The goal of the commercial user fee study is to change the number of categories to more accurately reflect uses, and to maintain the projected total level of sewer service user fees. Increasing the number of categories is also expected to reduce the number of appeals and fee reduction claims and adjustments. Mr. Streed noted that it is expected that there will be more fee reductions with the new rate structure than increases. Mr. Streed reviewed the revised schedules that were placed before the Directors just prior to the meeting, which included a Summary Comparison of Rate Structures by District, a Comparison of Residential Sewer Service Rates by agency, a Comparison of Commercial Rates by commercial categories, and a Property Use Category Proposal Comparison table. In response to the Committee, Mr. Streed stated that the Districts' Sewer Service Rates are the lowest of all the agencies surveyed because, under our 301 H Permit, we discharge less than full secondary treatment, therefore, our costs are less and our fees should be less. Mr. McIntyre advised the Committee that a statewide report on user fees made by Black and Veach is available for any of the Directors wishing to compare our fees on a broader range. The Committee was also advised that the reason the Districts cannot charge market value for sewer services, is because Proposition 218 states we cannot charge more than the cost to provide the service. Mr. Streed said that the connection fee study and proposals are expected to be completed and brought to the FAHR Committee in June and the user fees in May. Chairman Brown complimented Mr. Streed on an excellent report, and advised the Committee that this is a small step forward in a very complex process. The Chair requested that staff present Item No. 9 on the Supplemental Agenda out of order. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY 9. OMTS98-006: Authorize staff to enter into a Lease Agreement with the County of Orange for installation of an 800 MHz system at Plant No. 2 for a period of twenty(20) years. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 j March 11, 1998 MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Joint Boards authorize staff to enter into a Lease Agreement with the County of Orange for installation of an 800 MHz system at Plant No. 2 for a period of twenty (20) years. 8. CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item specified under"Closed Session" as Item 8(a) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 7:00 p.m. No action was taken re Agenda Item 8(a). At 7:20 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 549057.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Meetings. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None, MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 8, 1998, at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:22 p.m. Submitted by: enora Crane Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Secretary H:\WP.DTATINCIOCRANETAHRTAHRMal Rl 98MIN.DOC FAHR COMMITTEE MeetlngDate TORBds. 03/11/98 83/78/98 AGENDA REPORT ItemNumba Item Number County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1998 (FAHR98-18) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 1998. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), has served as the Districts' professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust as the Districts' third- party custodian, since September 1995. The Districts' Investment Policy, adopted by the Joint Boards, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The Districts' extemal money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Districts' Investment Policy. The Districts' portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) wao"a.nie v.ft%1V1atW1TnHRTAHR a MWAHgs1"W R"e."a. irv„re, Page 1 w IL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long- term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of February 1998 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the Districts' custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the Districts' funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts February 28, 1998 Yield(%) ' State of Calif. LAIF $ 7,602,926 5.7 Union Bank Checking Account 323,327 5.1 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 786,000 5.1 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 17,653,682 5.4 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 297,368,679 5.4 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 2,666 5.7 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 33,083,782 6.3 Petty Cash 4,400 Deferred Compensation 11,701.003 1.2-11.0 TOTAL $'ABB 528 465 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS k�donWaVlY .Ma nUlftmneTAHRTAHRB ARTAHRM10 da R—. lmrrrsr Page 2 9 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Reports GGS:SKIc maaorcmei W.mmmzi moanmva+xsnHaoewamrnw�esiaaoc R„ : IM7W Page 3 1 • . • 11 1 / 1 111 s iHk\ N iiuinui ...1111111 \ \ \\ \N \\\ \\ \\ %////. %//// %//% . , coos•.' .-.-.-.-. .-.-... �000•. .❖.•.•o sss❖. ..... :.... :.... :.... ..... :.... ..... ..... ..... ...... :.....� ..... .❖.❖a ❖.❖.o >.❖oo !❖.•.o .❖.❖ !.❖.•.o !.... ..... ..... ..... l.... ..... .....Is off ..... l.... :.... ..... !.... XXXXN XNeV if gyp !•iii0' !OOiii A•00.•i !0000� 'POP.•, lO�OOO 1 !.❖:❖: :❖:❖:� :❖:•:�:� !i!i!�!i!i !i!i!i!i! :❖:❖:� 1 MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L I ESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ending 18 February 1998) Liquid Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: p�M $17,654,737 Mello $17,653,682682 Historical Cost: PIMCO $17,655,534 Mellon $17,655,532 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.22 Of Index: 0.20 1&13 1 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gainlloss)of 1%Change: $39,076(0.22%) 15.1A REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 00/0 15.15 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 809A 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 'AAA' 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 00/° 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return(%): 1 Month: 0.40 3 Months: 1.36 12 Months: 5.62 Year-to-Date: 0.87 Index Total Rate of Return(%): 1 Month: 0.40 MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENTMANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 18 February 1998) Long Term Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: p�MCO 299,gg2gg,935 Mellon 297,368,679 Historical Cost: PIMCO $299,914,040 Mellon $297,871,900 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.42 Of Index: 2.33 15.1.3 1 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $7,380,737 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0°/" 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (%) I Month: 0.17 3 Months: 2.09 12 Months: 8.38 Year-to-Date: 1.28 Index Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: (0.02) OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PINCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY8BY SECTOR BASE: USD % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.46 0.46 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,380,969.34 2,380,969.34 13.41% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3,266,769.97 3.266,769.97 18.39% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 3 158,762.33 3,158,762.33 17.79% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN IYR 2:378,640.00 2,378,640.00 13.39% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 2,961,802.67 2,961.801.67 16.68% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 124,792.00 124,792.00 0.70% 0.00 4.679.70 3.75 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,271,735.77 14,271,735.77 80.36% 0.00 4,679.70 0.03 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,383.796.88 3,381,946.00 19.04% -1,850.88 161,500.00 4.78 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,383,796.88 3,381,946.00 19.04% -1,8SO.88 161,500.00 4.78 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 106,626.40 106,626.40 0.60% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 106,626.40 106,626.40 0.60% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 17,762,159.05 17,760,308.17 100.00% -11850.88 166,179.70 0.94 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 28-FEB-1998 HB110D % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.27 0.27 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -76,215,194.66 -76,215,194.66 -25.03% 0.00 0.00 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - DOME 13,494,275.00 13,504,972.73 4.44% 10,697.73 903,250.00 5.95 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 1,586,800.00 1,586,800.00 0.52% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 668,S29.00 668,529.00 0.22% 0.00 25,069.84 3.75 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS -60,465,S90.39 -60,4S4,892.66 -19.BS% 10,697.73 928,319.84 -1.37 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 183,489,415.59 183,071,951.26 60.12% -417,465.33 11,792,318.34 6.44 U.S. AGENCIES 81,924,906.00 82 399,863.SO 27.06% 474,957.SO 5,237,890.00 6.36 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 12 410,467.13 12:455,106.21 4.09% 44,639.08 852,482.57 6.84 FHLMC POOLS 20:313,037.27 20,262,935.94 6.65% -50 101.33 1,400,037.03 6.91 FNMA POOLS 9 971,162.83 9,934,062.56 3.26% -37:100.27 609,895.45 6.14 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGA 3:070,032.46 3,079 264.96 1.01% 9,232.50 190,444.17 6.18 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 507,486.87 508:848.47 0.27% 1,361.60 31,464.19 6.18 BANKING & FINANCE 36,747,202.00 36,6SO,289.13 12.04% -96,912.87 2,357,951.22 6.43 INDUSTRIAL 9,903,780.00 9,461,250.00 3.11% -442,530.00 832,500.00 8.80 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 358,337,491.15 357,823,572.03 117.S1% -513,919.12 23,304,982.97 6.51 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 7,132,231.27 7,132,231.27 2.34% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 7,132,231.27 7,132,231.27 2.34% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 305,004,132.03 304,500,910.64 100.00% 503,221.39 24,133,302 81 7.93 Page 1 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 1 OCSF07511102 199VDV28 RUN DATE 03/05/90 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 13.18.43 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 124.792.00 DEBT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 124.792.00 .87 999495906 PUBLIC II 124.792.00 .71 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK COME DISC 5.388 .000 P-1 99.110 2.378,640.00 16.66 313305VB9 MAT 04/03/1996 2.378,640.00 23.47 3,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTC ASSH DISC 5.448 .000 P-1 98.760 3.061.547.% 21.45 313589NL3 MAT OS/06/1996 3.061.547.94 17.34 $00,000.00 PITNEY BONES CC DISC 5.477 .000 P-1 99.682 797,452.00 5.58 72447HCB6 03/11/1998 797.452.00 4.52 800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.503 .000 P-1 99.211 793,690.67 5.56 637430DG3 04/16/1998 795,690.67 4.50 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LH WE CORP DISC 5.517 .000 P-1 99.104 2.477.596.64 17.36 313397VY4 MAT 04/24/19" 2,477,596.64 14.03 800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.520 .000 98.728 789,826.67 5.53 36959JON0 04/22/1998 789,826.67 4.47 3,000,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC HTS 5.527 .000 P-1 98.727 2,961,801.67 20.75 313315VQS MAT 94/16/19" 2.961.801.67 16.78 100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 5.668 .000 P-1 97.214 97,214.39 .68 313589YG2 MAT 06/19/1998 97,214.39 .55 800,000.00 FEDERAL ROME LN NTG CORP DISC 5.677 .000 P-1 98.647 789,173.35 5.52 313397UT6 MAT 03/26/1998 789,173.33 4.47 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS S.SAO .056 14.271.735.31 100.00 14,271,735.31 80.84 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3.4D0.000.00 U S TREASURY MOTES 5.404 4.775 AAA 99.469 3.383.796.88 100.00 912827M66 04.7502 10/31/1998 DO 11/01/93 3,351,946.00 19.16 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 2 OCSFO7511102 1998/02/28 RUM DATE 03/05/98 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUM TIME 13.18.43 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ TOTAL FINED INCOME SECURITIES 5.404 4.775 3,583,796.88 100.00 3,361,966.00 19.26 ________ _______ _________________ ________- TOTAL 5.381 .241 17,655,532.19 100.00 17,653,681.31 100.00 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSFO7522202 1998/02/28 RON DATE : 03/05/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.18.43 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ Y. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH R CASH EQUIVALENTS 668,529.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 668,529.00 4.24 999495906 PUBLIC II 668,529.00 .18 600,000.00 NICONSIN EL PNR DISC 5.537 .000 P-1 99.328 595,966.67 3.78 97665SDA5 04/10/1998 595,966.67 .16 1,000,000.00 OU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 5.551 .ODO P-1 99.083 990,833.33 6.28 26354BDU3 04/28/1998 990,833.33 .27 13,500,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/O 5.994 5.948 100.037 13,494,275.00 85.68 066"OKU7 05.950% 06/19/1998 OD 06/19/97 13,504,972.73 3.61 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.106 4.529 15,749,604.00 IOD.DO 15,760,501.73 4.22 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES $36,268.26 FNMA POOL 60065581 .000 6.082 AAA 100.344 5401122.69 .15 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DD 09/01/88 538,113.02 .14 4,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN TRANCNE RTR 96 .000 5.386 Al 100.263 3,970,480.00 1.12 345402DZI FLTG/RT 11/09/1995 OD 11/08/93 4,010,520.00 1.07 7,300,00D.OD FORD MOTOR CR MTH TR 0 DO177 .000 5.517 Al 99.687 6,999,748.00 1.97 345402W3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DD D3/3D/94 7,077,777.00 1.89 7,050,330.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX MT 3.654 3.643 AAA 99.500 7,041,308.65 1.96 9128273AS 3.625K 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 7,015,078.35 1.88 10,181,300.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.735 3.459 AAA 97.562 9,9D2,130.47 2.17 9128272M3 3.375% 01/IS/2D07 OD 01/15/97 9,933,079.91 2.66 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OCSF07522202 1998/02/28 RUN DATE : 03/OS/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RIM TIME : 13.18.43 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE / TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ -_________ 16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.43D 6.797 AAA 11D.344 17,925,000.00 4.93 912827586 07.5007 OV15/2005 DO 02/15/95 27,655,040.00 4.73 15,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.562 5.865 AAA 100.172 15,045,117.19 4.19 912827Z70 05.87S% 10/31/1998 DO 10/31/96 15,025,800.00 4.02 52,800,D00.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.627 6.750 AAA 101.859 53,883,310.97 15.03 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 53,781,552.00 14.40 28,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.637 6.294 AAA 103.281 29,011,827.84 9.08 9126272WI 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO D6/02/97 28,918,680.00 7.74 27,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.683 7.060 AAA 106.234 29,146,743.53 8.13 912827DU 07.SOOY. 11/15/20Dl DO 11/15/91 29,108,116.00 7.79 3,50D,O00.DO U S TREASURY NOTES 5.796 6.391 AAA 103.656 3,613,203.13 1.01 912827250 06.6nY. 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 3,627,960.00 .97 2,000,ODO.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 5.857 6.659 AAA 131.406 2,663,639.50 .73 912810DY1 08.750% 05/15/2017 GO 05/15/87 2,628,120.00 .70 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN HT 5.871 5.971 AAA 100.156 5,000,781.25 1.39 31364FFH8 5.680% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 5,007,800.00 1.34 3,876,419.04 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 5.957 5.900 AAA 100.006 3,868,393.65 1.08 161614AE2 5.9007. 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 3,876,651.63 1.04 453,731.84 FNMA POOL #0238575 6.054 6.170 AAA 100.344 456,993.04 .12 31370Q6LB 6.191% 03/01/2033 00 09/O1/93 455,292.68 .12 704,754.27 FNMA POOL 80339016 6.089 6.186 AAA 100.344 709,819.69 .19 31375MSD6 6.2077. 11/01/203S DO 03/01/96 707,178.62 .19 245,571.05 FNMA POOL 80313769 6.090 6.185 AAA 1DO.344 247,134.65 .06 31374GQWO 6.206% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 246,215.13 .07 5,940,005.28 FNMA POOL 40313783 6.D93 6.121 AAA 100.344 5,982,699.06 1.66 313746RC3 6.142% 05/01/2D36 DO 1D/01/97 S,960,4W.90 1.60 1,029,875.35 FNMA POOL 40313371 6.142 6.173 AAA 100.344 1,D37,277.58 .28 31374GCGD 6.194% 06/01/2D29 DO O1101/97 1,033,418.12 .28 990,000.49 FNMA POOL #0313600 6.10 6.189 AAA 1DO.344 997,116.12 .27 313746KMS 6.1937. 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 993,4D6.09 .27 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OMF07322202 1998/02/28 RUN DATE 05/05/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME a 13.18.43 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.162 8.871 AAA 125.406 6,233,593.75 1.75 91281DOE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 OD 07/05/83 6,270,300.00 1.68 5071486.88 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.183 AAA 100.268 507,486.87 .14 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 508,848.47 .14 3,076,642.43 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME ED 96-4 A3 6.213 6.185 AAA 1DO.085 3,070,032.46 .86 2107SWMS 6.1907. 10/15/2011 DD 11/23/96 3,079,264.96 .82 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.277 6.114 AAA 102.219 4,994,531.25 1.42 9128272LE 06.no% 02/28/2002 DD 02/28/97 5,130,950.00 1.37 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN MTN 6.291 6.130 AAA 101.625 4,488,705.00 1.27 31364CKV5 6.2307.. 05/01/2002 GO 03/03/97 4,573,125.00 1.22 39,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN OK CONS BDS 6.305 6.488 AAA 1DO.031 39,890,500.00 11.07 3133915B6 6.490X 09/13/2000 OD 09/13/95 39,612,276.00 10.60 4,500,000.00 CATERPILLAR FINL MTNS TR00389 6.322 5.784 A2 99.926 4,466.745.00 1.25 14912LSE2 8.760% 07/15/1998 DD 12/15/95 4,496,670.00 1.20 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN 000196 6.364 6.594 BAA1 100.843 5,039,450.00 1.4D 52517PM4 6.650X 11/08/2000 DD 11/08/96 5,042,150.00 1.35 4,145,662.80 GNMA II POOL 00080023 6.375 6.849 AAA 102.203 4,214,325.35 1.18 36225CAZ9 7.000% IV20/2026 DO 12/01/96 4,236,991.75 1.13 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEAMS COS INC SR NTS 6.425 6.655 A2 101.430 1,317,619.35 .36 073902AN8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 1,323,661.50 .35 1,000,000.00 CNRYSLER FINL MTN TR 0 00335 6.514 6.250 A3 TWIGS 993,160.00 .27 17120QPY1 6.26OX 07/20/1998 DD 07/18/95 1,001,550.00 .27 3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP HTN TR00324 6.532 8.195 A3 102.198 3,911,640.00 1.05 37042RPMS 8.375% OV03/1999 DD 0/03/95 3,781,326.00 1.01 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL WO ASSN MTH 6.577 6.452 AAA 102.667 8,022,576.00 2.29 31364CB09 6.625% 04/18/2001 OD 04/18/96 8,214,960.00 2.20 2,900,000.00 CNRYSLER FINL MTN TR 0 00306 6.591 7.259 A3 100.147 2,952,896.00 .81 17120QNT4 7.270% 04/13/1998 DD 04/13/95 2,904,263.00 .78 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS HT 6.593 8.799 A2 105.125 9,903,780.00 2.64 7181542432 9.250X 02/15/2000 9,461,250.00 2.53 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF07522202 1998/02/28 RUN DATE 03/05/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 13.18.43 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 20,000,529.00 FNLMC GROUP RG5-0476 6.628 6.909 AAA 101.312 20,313,037.27 5.66 31280DR55 7.O00X 02/0112003 DO 02/01/98 20,262,935.% 5.42 10,000,000.DO FEDERAL HATL MTG ASSN MTN 6.636 5.705 AAA 90.859 9.593,750.00 2.76 31364BNF3 5.640X 02/20/2001 DO OV20/96 9,885,900.00 2.65 3,000,DDO.00 G M A C MED TERM MTS 6.660 8.252 A3 104.524 3,227,070.00 .87 37042RKQ4 8.625X 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 3,335,720.00 .84 S,ODO,D00.00 FEDERAL HOME LN HTG CORP SEES 6.713 6.051 AAA 99.000 4,851,562.50 1.38 3134AOKV8 5.990% 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/96 4,950,000.00 1.33 7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO MR FMLMC 6.776 6.884 AAA 101.687 7,304,375.00 2.06 999MV357 7.0DO7. 02/15/2008 7,372,307.50 1.97 2,750,OOO.CO COMMIT TO MR FMLMC 6.789 6.916 AAA 101.218 2,782,656.25 .77 999ACA766 7.000X D3/01/2028 21785,495.00 .75 5,660,355.65 GNMA II POOL 0080088M 6.828 6.844 AAA 102,281 5,784,175.% 1.61 36225CC20 7.00OX 06/20/2027 OD 06/01/97 5,789,468.36 1.55 2,372,303.88 GNMA II POOL 00008684 6.865 6.838 AAA 102.375 2,411,965.84 .67 36202KUH6 7.00OX 08/20/2025 OD O8101/95 2,428,646.10 .65 2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.906 8.287 AAA 159.891 4,029,030.31 1.11 912810UJ4 13.25D7. OS/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 3,997,275.00 1.07 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.378 6.342 358,337,491.IS 100.00 3S7,M S72.03 95.78 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 5.377 6.336 374,087,095.15 100.00 373,583,873.76 100.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST - CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 RASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV WIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE WIN LOSS CURB WIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 25-FEB-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827D25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 2S-FEB-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827D25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 18-FEB-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128272W1 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cW 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 25-FEB-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128272W1 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.S00% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-FEB-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9934GW369 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.780% 02/18/1998 DO 02/17/98 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 23-FEB-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 99346ZISO LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.3BO% 02/23/1998 DO 02/20/98 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 23-FEB-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 99346Z180 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.380% 02/23/1998 DO 02/20/98 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700 ODO.00 AMERICAN TEL & TL DISC 19-FEB-1998 -1,698 976.22 -1,698,976.22 99.939777 03618BBP3 02/23/1998 19-FEB-1998 1,698:976.22 1,698,976.22 99.939777 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 AMERICAN TEL & TL DISC 19-FEB-1998 -1,698,976.22 -1,698,976.22 99.939777 0301BBBP3 02/23/1998 19-FEB-1998 -1,698,976.22 0.00 99.939777 PC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 19-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300 000.00 AMERICAN TEL & TL DISC 30-JAN-1998 -298 264.67 -298,264.67 99.421555 03b18BCC1 03/12/1998 02-FEB-1998 298:264.67 298,264.67 99.421555 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300.000.00 AMERICAN TEL & TL DISC 30-JAN-1998 -298,264.67 -298,264.67 99.421SSS 03018BCC1 03/12/1998 02-FEB-1998 -298,264.67 0.00 99.4215SS PC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 26-FEB-1998 -990,833.33 -990,833.33 99.083333 263S4BDU3 04/28/1998 27-FEB-1998 990,833.33 990,833.33 99.083333 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000 000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 26-FEB-1998 -990,833.33 -990.833.33 99.083333 265 S4BDU3 04/28/1998 27-FEB-1998 -990,833.33 0.00 99.083333 PC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS DISC 02-FEB-1998 -2,378,640.00 -2,378,640.00 99.110000 31338SVB9 MAT 04/03/1998 02-FEB-1998 2,378,640.00 2,378,640.00 99.110000 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-FEB-1998 -2,378,64000 -2,378,640.00 99.110000 31'i385VB9 MAT 04/03/1998 02-FEB-1998 -2,378,640:00 0.00 99.110000 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 23-FEB-1998 -2,378,48000 -2 378,480.00 99.103333 M397VY4 MAT 04/24/1998 23-FEB-1998 2,378,480:00 2:378,480.00 99.103333 B MORGAN 7 P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 23-FEB-1998 -2,378,480.00 -2,378,480.00 99.103333 - --_-�-_ engn 2 OCS0000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ ' SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 313397VY4 MAT 04/24/1998 23-FEB-1998 -2,378,480.00 0.00 99.103333 FC MORGAN 3 P SECS INC, NEW YORK 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 24-FEB-1998 -99.116.64 -99,116.64 99.116640 315397VY4 MAT 04/24/1998 24-FEB-1998 99,116.64 99,116.64 99.116640 B MORGAN I P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 24-FEB-1998 -99,116 64 -99,116.64 99.116640 315397VY4 MAT 04/24/1998 24-FEB-1998 -99,116:64 0.00 99.116640 FC MORGAN I P SECS INC, NEW YORK 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,100 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 12-FEB-1998 -3,061,547 94 -3,061,S47.94 98.759611 31§589WL3 MAT 05/06/1998 12-FEB-1998 3,061,547:94 3,061,547,94 98.7S9611 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,100 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 12-FEB-1998 -3,O61,S47.94 -3,061,S47.94 98.759611 M589WL3 MAT 05/06/1998 12-FEB-1998 -3,O61,S47.94 0.00 98.7S9611 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 12-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 23-FEB-1998 -793 690.67 -793,690.67 99.211334 63743DDG3 04/16/1998 23-FEB-1998 793:690.67 793,690.67 99.211334 B LEHMAN BROS INC, NI ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 23-FEB-1998 -793,69067 -793,690.67 99.211334 63743DDG3 04/16/1998 23-FEB-1998 -793,690:67 0.00 99.211334 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 PITNEY BOWES INC DISC 17-FEB-1998 -797,452.00 -797,4S2.00 99.681500 72447HCB6 03/11/1998 18-FEB-1998 797,452.00 797,4S2.00 99.681500 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 PITNEY BOWES INC DISC 17-FEB-1998 -797,4S2.00 -797,452.00 99.682500 72447HCB6 03/11/1998 18-FEB-1998 -797,452.00 0.00 99.681S00 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 18-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 3 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ __________________ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 WICONSIN EL PWR DISC 24-FEB-1998 -595,966.67 -S95,966.67 99.327777 97665SDA5 04/10/1998 25-FEB-1998 595,966.67 595,966.67 99.327777 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600 000.00 WICONSIN EL PWR DISC 24-FEB-1998 -595,966.67 -595,966.67 99.327777 97965SDA5 04/10/1998 25-FEB-1998 -S95,966.67 0.00 99.327777 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 25-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-FEB-1998 -800.000.00 -800,000.00 100.000000 99146W369 05.780% 02/18/1998 OD 02/17/98 17-FEB-1998 800,000.00 800,000.00 100.000000 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 17-FEB-1998 -800,000.00 -800,000.00 100.000000 99346W369 05.78D% 02/18/1998 DO 02/17/98 17-FEB-1998 -800,000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-FEB-1998 -3,200,00000 -3,200,000.00 100.000000 99146Z180 05.380% 02/23/1998 DD 02/20/98 20-FEB-1998 3,200,000:00 3,200,000.00 100.000000 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,200,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-FEB-1998 -3,200,000.00 -3,200,000.00 100.000000 99346z180 05.380% 02/23/1998 DD 02/20/98 20-FEB-1998 -3,200,000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-FEB-1998 -700,000.00 -700,000.00 100.00D000 99146ZISO 05.380% 02/23/1998 DD 02/20/98 20-FEB-1998 700,000.00 700,000.00 100.00D000 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000D00 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 20-FEB-1998 -700,000.00 -700,000.00 100.000000 99146Zl8O 05.380% 02/23/1998 DO 02/20/98 20-FEB-1998 -700,000.00 0.00 100.00D000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 284,080.40 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 17-FEB-1998 -284,080.40 -284,080.40 1.000000 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 17-FEB-1998 284,080.40 284.080.40 1.000000 B 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 91,780.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-FEB-1998 -91,780.00 -91,780.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 02-FEB-1998 91,780.00 91,780.00 1.000000 e 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 56,345.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 09-FEB-1998 -56,345.00 -56,345.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 09-FEB-1998 56,345.00 56,345.00 1.000000 B 09-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 119,614.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 13-FEB-1998 -119,614.00 -119,614.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 13-FES-1998 119,614.00 119,614.00 1.000000 B 13-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1.510,440.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 17-FEB-1998 -1,510.440.00 -1,510,440.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 17-FEB-1991 1,510,440.00 1,510,440.00 1.000000 B 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 707,433.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 18-FEB-1998 -707,433.00 -707.433.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 18-FEB-1998 707,433.00 707,433.00 1.000000 B 18-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO 2,674.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 18-FEB-1998 -2,674.00 -2,674.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 18-FEB-1991 2,674.00 2,674.00 1.000000 B 18-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 29,261.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 23-FEB-1998 -29,261.00 -29,261.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 23-FEB-1991 29,261.00 29,261.00 1.000000 B 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,037,331.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 23-FEB-1998 -1.037,331.00 -1,037.331.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 23-FEB-1998 1,037,331.00 1,037.331.00 1.000000 B 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 5 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 628,131.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 26-FEB-1998 -628,13100 -628 131.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 26-FER-1998 628,131:00 628:131.00 1.000000 B 26-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.00D000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,398.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 27-FEB-1998 -40,398.00 -40,398.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 27-FEB-1998 40,398.00 40,398.00 1.000000 e 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,529.00 FHLMC GROUP #GS-0476 22-JAN-1998 -20,313,037.27 -20,313,037.27 101.562S00 3128DDQSS 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 23-FEB-1998 20,313,037.27 20,313,037.27 101.562500 B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,529.00 FHLMC GROUP #GS-0476 22-JAN-1998 -85,557.82 -85,557.82 101.562500 3128DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 101.562500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 20,000 529.00 FHLMC GROUP #GS-0476 22-JAN-1998 -20,399,595.09 -20,398,595.09 101.562500 3118DDQ55 7.000% 02/01/2003 DO 02/01/98 23-FEB-1998 -20,398,595.09 0.00 101.562500 PC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 O.DO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 536 268.26 FNMA POOL #0065581 20-JAN-1998 -540,122.69 -540,122.69 100.718750 31'i62M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 24-FEB-1998 540,122.69 540,122.69 100.718750 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NV ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 536,268.26 FNMA POOL #0065581 20-JAN-1998 -2,123.88 -2,123.88 100.718750 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.718750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 536,268.26 FNMA POOL #0065581 20-JAN-1998 -542,246.57 -542,246.57 100.718750 31362M2N7 6.391% 08/01/2028 DO 09/01/88 24-FEB-1998 -542,246.57 0.00 100.718750 PC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 6 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USO 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 453 731.84 FNMA POOL #0238575 20-IAN-1998 -456,993 04 -4S6 993.04 100.7187SO 31i7OQ6L8 6.103% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 24-FEB-1998 456,993:04 456:993.04 100.718750 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4S3 731.84 FNMA POOL #0238575 20-7AN-1998 -1,799.31 -1,799.31 100.718750 31#7OQ6LB 6.103% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.718750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 453 731.84 FNNA POOL #0238575 20-JAN-1998 -458,792.35 -458,792.35 100.718750 31'i7OQ6L8 6.103% 03/01/2033 DO 09/01/93 24-FEB-1998 -4S8,792.3S 0.00 100.718750 PC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.57 FNMA POOL #0313371 20-IAN-1998 -997,116.20 -997 116.20 100.718750 31374000O 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 24-FEB-1998 997,116.20 997:116.20 100.718750 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NV ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.57 FNMA POOL #0313371 20-7AN-1998 -3,921.SO -3,921.SO 100.718750 311740000 6.3.94% 08/01/2029 DD 01/01/97 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.718750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.57 FNMA POOL #0313371 20-IAN-1998 -1,001,037 70 -1,001,037.70 100.718750 31374000O 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 24-FEB-1998 -1,001,037:70 0.00 100.718750 PC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NV 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39 874.79 FNMA POOL 00313371 20-IAN-1998 -40,16138 -40,161.38 100.718750 3l174000O 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 24-FEB-1998 40,161:38 40,161.38 100.7187SO B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NV ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 39 874.78 FNMA POOL #0313371 20-IAN-1998 -257.95 -157.95 100.718750 31i740000 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.718750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 39 874.78 FNMA POOL #0313371 20-IAN-1998 -40 319.33 -40,319.53 100.7187SO 3l174000O 6.194% 08/01/2029 DO 01/01/97 24-FEB-1998 -40:319.33 0.00 100.718750 PC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NV 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000D00 - -- Page 7 OCSGD00100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY TRANS CODE/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLCO PLE DATE/ GAINST/ INV GAIN LOSS CURR GAINLOSS/ ASE LOSS BASE %RATE% -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.49 FNMA POOL #0313600 20-3AN-1998 -997,116.12 -997,116.12 100.718750 31574GKM8 6.193% OS/01/2036 DD 06/01/97 24-FEB-1998 997,116.12 997,116.12 1DO.7187SO e BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.49 FNMA POOL #0313600 20-JAN-1998 -3,927.83 -3,927.83 100.718750 31374GKMS 6.193% 05/01/2036 DD 06/01/97 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.718750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.49 FNMA POOL #0313600 20-JAN-1998 -1,001,043.95 -1,001,043.9S 100.718750 31i74GKM8 6.193% 05/01/2036 DO 06/01/97 24-FEB-1998 -1,001,043.95 0.00 100.718750 PC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FE8-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 245,371.05 FNMA POOL #0313769 20-JAN-1998 -247,134.65 -247,134.65 100.7187SO 31374GOW0 6.139% OS/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 24-FEB-1998 247,134.6S 247,134.6S 100.718750 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24S 371.05 FNMA POOL #0313769 20-JAN-1998 -972.26 -972.26 100.718750 31J74GQWO 6.139% 05/01/2036 DO 09/01/97 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.718750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 245,371.05 FNMA POOL #0313769 20-JAN-2998 -248,106.91 -248,106.91 100.718750 31374GQN0 6.139% 05/01/2036 DD 09/01/97 24-FEB-1998 -248,106.91 0.00 100.718750 PC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-JAN-1998 -997,116.51 -997 116.51 100.718750 31#74GRc3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 997,116.51 997:116.51 100.718750 e BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-JAN-1998 -3,924.67 -3,924.67 100.718750 31�74GRC3 6.142% OS/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 0.00 O.DO 100.718750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 8 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR WIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 990,000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-7AN-1998 -1 001.041.18 -1,002,041.18 300.718750 31374GRC3 6.142% OS/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 -1:001,041.18 0.00 100.718750 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-7AN-1998 -997,116.51 -997,116.51 100.718750 M74GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 997,116.51 997,116.51 100.718750 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL 00313783 20-3AN-1998 -3,924.67 -3,924.67 100.718750 M74GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/02/97 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 300.718750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-7AN-1998 -1,001,042 18 -1,001,041.18 100.718750 31i74GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 -1,001,041:18 0.00 100.718750 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 990,000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-IAN-1998 -997,116.51 -997,116.51 100.718750 31374GRC3 6.142% OS/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 997,116.51 997,116.51 100.718750 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-IAN-1998 -3,924.67 -3,924.67 100.718750 31374GRC3 6.142% OS/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.718750 16 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-7AN-1998 -1,001,041.18 -1,001.041.18 100.718750 31374GRC3 6.142% OS/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 -1,001,041.18 0.00 1006718750 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-IAN-1998 -997,116.51 -997,116.51 100.718750 311i74GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 997,116.51 997,116.51 100.718750 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 990.000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-0AN-1998 -3,924.67 -3,924.67 100.718750 31374GRC3 6.142% OS/01/2036 DD 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.718750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 9 - OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990j000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-IAN-1998 -1,001,041.18 -1,001,041.18 100.718750 3174GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 -1,001,041.18 0.00 100.718750 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-7AN-1998 -997,11651 -997,116.51 100.7187SO 31i74GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 997,116:51 997,116.51 100.718750 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-7AN-1998 -3,924.67 -3,924.67 100.718750 31'i74GRC3 6.142% OS/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FE8 -1998 0.00 0.00 100.7187SO IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-IAN-1998 -1,001,041.18 -1,001,041.18 100.718750 31574GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 -1,001,041.18 0.00 100.718750 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-7AN-1998 -997,116.51 -997 116.51 100.718750 31374GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 997,116.51 997:116.51 100.718750 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-IAN-1998 -3,924.67 -3,924.67 100.7187SO 31174GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 OD 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.7187SO IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.88 FNMA POOL #0313783 20-7AN-1998 -1,001,041 18 -1,001,041.18 100.718750 M74GRC3 6.142% 05/01/2036 DO 10/01/97 24-FEB-1998 -1,001,041:18 0.00 100.718750 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 704 754.27 FNMA POOL #0339016 20-7AN-1998 -709,819.69 -709,819.69 100.718750 31'i75MSD6 6.138% 11/01/2035 DD 03/01/96 24-FEB-1998 709,819.69 709,819.69 100.7187SO B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Pape 10 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER CDMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 704,754.27 FNMA. POOL 00339016 20-IAN-1998 -2,791.16 -2,791.16 100.718750 31375MSD6 6.138% 11/01/2035 DO 03/01/96 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.718750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 704,7S4.27 FNMA POOL #0339016 20-IAN-2998 -712,610.85 -712,610.85 100.7187SO 31375MSD6 6.138% 11/01/2035 00 03/01/96 24-FEB-1998 -712,610.8S 0.00 100.718750 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,482,957.64 GNMA II POOL #0008684 30-IAN-1998 2,524,469.S9 2,524,469.59 101.671875 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/202S DD 08/01/95 24-FEB-1998 -2,S24,469.S9 -2,524,469.S9 101.67187E BC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,482,9S7.64 GNMA iI POOL #0008684 30-IAN-1998 11,104.34 11,1D4.34 101.67187E 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/202S oo 08/01/95 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 101.67187E IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.ODD000OOO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 2,372 303.88 GNMA II POOL #0008684 30-IAN-1998 -2,411,965.84 -2,411,96S.84 101.671875 3UO2KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 oD 08/01/95 24-FEB-1998 2,411,965.84 2,411.965.84 101.671875 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2.372 30388 GNMA ii POOL #0008684 30-IAN-1998 -10,609.47 -10,609.47 101.671875 36102K6H6 7.000% 08/20/202S DD 08/01/9S 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 101.671875 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,372,303.88 GNMA II POOL #0008684 30-IAN-1998 -2,422,S7S.31 -2,422,57S.31 101.67187E 36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DD 08/01/95 24-FEB-1998 -2,422,S75.31 0.00 101.671875 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S,260,572.79 GNMA II POOL #0009747 21-IAN-1998 -S,381,091.05 -513811091.OS 101.8437SO 36202KNG6 6.875% 11/20/202S DD 11/01/95 24-FEB-1998 -S,381,091.05 0.00 101.843750 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5.236 172.79 GNMA Il 11/2 /2 08747 4 , 35 ,56 4.60 50102KNG6 687S% 002S DO 11/O1/95 2 -FEB-1998 -5,357S64.60 -5, 74.60 101.8437 BC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 ---.- -__. - Page 11 OCS0000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USO 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -5.260 572.79 GNMA 11 POOL #0009747 21-MAN-1998 23,526.45 23,526.45 301.843750 36f02KHG6 6.875% 11/20/2025 DD 11/03./95 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 101.843750 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,260 572.79 GNMA II POOL #0008747 21-3A1998 5,381,091.05 5,381,091.05 101.843750 361D2Km;6 6.875% 11/20/202S DO 11/01/95 24-FEN --1998 5,381,091.05 0.00 101.843750 FCC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC. NY 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 17,SOO.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-FEB-1998 -18,657,642.50 -18,657,642.50 106.615100 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 16-MAR-1998 18,657,642.50 18,657,642.SO 106.615100 8 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 17,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-FEB-1998 -438,708.57 -438,708.57 106.615100 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 106.615100 18 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 91900 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 -10.541,351.70 -10,541,351.70 106.478300 91f827D25 07.SGD% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 16-MAR-1998 10,541,351.70 10,541,351.70 106.478300 B HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9.900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 -248,183.70 -248,183.70 106.478300 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 16-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 106.478300 IB ----------- 0.00 0.G0 1.OD000OOOO 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO 3,400,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 30-MAN-1998 -3,383,796.88 -3,383,796.88 99.523437 912827M66 04.750% 10/31/1998 DO 11/01/93 02-FEB-1998 3,383,796.88 3,383,796.88 99.523437 B CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-MAN-1998 -41,936.46 -41,936.46 99.523437 912827M66 04.750% 10/31/1998 DO 11/01/93 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 99.S23437 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Page 12 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 3,400,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 30-IAN-1998 -3,42S 733 34 -3,425,733.34 99.S23437 912827M66 04.750% 10/31/1998 DO 11/01/93 02-FEB-1998 -3,425:733:34 0.00 99.523437 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-3AN-1998 -26,053,393.11 -26,OS3,393.11 102.326700 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 00 08/31/94 13-FEB-1998 -26,OS3,393.11 0.00 102.326700 FC CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CDR 13-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,200 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1998 -25,139,661.80 -2S,139,661.80 103.882900 91H272w1 06.SOD% OS/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 13-MAR-1998 2S,139,661.80 2S,139,661.80 103.882900 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,200.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1998 -44S,307.14 -44S,107.14 103.882900 9128272wl 06.S00% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 13-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 103.882900 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 -1,036,244.00 -1,036,244.00 103.624400 9128272wl 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 13-MAR-1998 1,036,244.00 1,036,244.00 103.624400 B HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000 000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 -18,392.86 -18,392.86 103.624400 9118272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 13-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 103.624400 i8 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 22-3AN-1998 20,312,S0000 20 312,500.00 101.562500 999ABv357 7.000% 02/15/2008 23-FEB-1998 -20,312,500:00 -20:312.500.00 101.562500 BC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA 20-3AN-1998 10,071,87500 10,071,875.00 100.718750 999AaY856 6.199% 02/25/2028 24-FEB-1998 -20,071,875:00 -10,071,875.00 100.718750 BC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 09-3AN-1998 -2,796.406.25 -2,796,406.2E 101.687500 999ASY880 7.000% 02/01/2028 12-FEB-1998 -2,796,406.2E 0.00 101.687500 FC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 12-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 13 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 09-JAN-1998 -7,374.609 38 -7,374,609.38 101.718750 999ABY880 7.000% 02/01/2028 12-FEB-1998 -7,374,609:38 0.00 101.718750 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 12-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 09-FEB-1998 -2,782,656.25 -2 792 656.25 101.187500 999ACA766 7.000% 03/01/2029 12-MAR-1998 2,782.656.25 2:782:656.25 101.187500 B GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 67 970.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JAN-1998 -67,970.00 -67,970.00 100.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-3AN-1998 67,970.00 67:970.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 67 97000 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-3AN-1998 -67,970.00 -67,970.00 100.000000 91N2HAS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-3AN-1998 -67:970.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 AMERICAN TEL & TL DISC 13-FEB-1998 298 264 67 298,264.67 99.421556 0301SBCCI 03/12/1998 13-FEB-1998 -298:264:67 -298,264.67 99.421SS6 S LEHMAN BROS INC, NJ ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300 000.00 AMERICAN TEL & TL DISC 13-FEB-1999 495.58 495.58 99.421556 03618BCC1 03/12/1998 13-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 99.421556 is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300 000.00 AMERICAN TEL & TL DISC 13-FEB-1998 29B 760.25 298,760.25 99.421556 036188CC1 03/12/1998 13-FEB-1998 298:760.25 0.00 99.421556 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 13-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -100 000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 13-FEB-1998 99,437 81 99,437.81 99.437810 26#54BCS9 03/05/1998 13-FEB-1998 -99,437:81 -99,437.81 99.437810 Page 14 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 13-FEB-1998 256.08 256.08 99.437810 26354BCS9 03/OS/1998 13-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 99.437810 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 13-FEB-1998 99 693.89 99,693.99 99.437810 26354HC59 03/05/1998 13-FEB-1998 99:693.89 0.00 99.437810 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 13-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 13-FEB-1998 296,793.17 296,793.17 98.931056 637430D73 04/07/1998 13-FEB-1998 -296,793.17 -296,793.17 98.931056 s MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 13-FEB-1998 777.66 777.66 98.931056 63743DD73 04/07/1998 13-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 98.931056 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 13-FEB-1998 297.570.83 297,570.83 98.931056 63743DD73 G4/07/1998 13-FEB-1998 297,570.83 0.00 98.931056 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 13-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.0000D0000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 18-FEB-1998 800,00000 800,000.00 100.000000 99346N369 05.780% 02/18/1998 DO 02/17/98 18-FEB-1998 -800,000:00 -800,000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 18-FEB-1998 128.44 3.28.44 100.000000 99346N369 05.780% 02/18/1998 DO 02/17/98 18-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.000000 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 18-FEB-1998 800,128.44 800,128.44 100.000000 99346w369 05.780% 02/18/1998 DO 02/17/98 18-FEB-1998 800,128.44 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 18-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 MOO BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-FEB-1998 700,000.00 700,000.00 100.000000 991i46H80 05.380% 02/23/1998 DO 02/20/98 23-FEB-1998 -700,000.00 -700:000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-FEB-1998 3,200,000.00 3,200,000.00 100.000000 991461180 05.380% 02/23/1998 DO 02/20/98 23-FEB-1998 -3,200,000.00 -3,200:000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-FEB-1998 1,434.67 1,434.67 100.000000 99i461180 05.380% 02/23/1998 DD 02/20/98 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.000000 I5 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-FEB-1998 313.83 313.83 100.000000 993462180 05.380% 02/23/1998 Do 02/20/98 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,200. 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-FEB-1998 3,201,434.67 3,201,434.67 100.000000 993i461180 05.380% 02/23/1998 DD 02/20/98 23-FEB-1998 3,201,434.67 0.00 100.000000 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-FEB-1998 700,313 83 700,313.83 100.000000 99146Z180 05.380% 02/23/1998 DO 02/20/98 23-FEB-1998 700,313:83 0.00 100.000000 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 O.DO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -284 080.40 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 18-FEB-1998 284,080.40 284,080.40 1.000000 999087094 VAR RT DD 06/26/1997 18-FEB-1998 -284,OB0.40 -284,080.40 1.000000 5 18-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -296 151.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-FEB-199B 296 15100 296,151.00 1.000000 99449S906 PUBLIC II 02-FEB-1998 -296:151:00 -296,151.00 1.000000 S 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -61 548.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 12-FEB-1998 61 S4800 62,548.00 1.000000 994495906 PUBLIC II 22-FEB-1998 -61:548:00 -61,548.00 1.000000 PRga 16 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ S 12-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -59,404.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 12-FEB-1998 59,404.00 59,404.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 12-FEB-1998 -59,4G4.00 -S9,404.00 1.000000 S 12-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,698,976.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 19-FEB-1998 1.698,976.00 1,698,976.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 19-FEB-1998 -1.698,976.00 -1,698,976.00 1.000000 S 19-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -12,087.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 20-FEB-1998 12,087.00 12,087.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 20-FEB-1998 -22,097.00 -12,087.00 1.000000 5 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -99,117.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 24-FEB-1998 99,117.00 99,117.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 24-FEB-1998 -99,117.00 -99,117.00 1.0000GO S 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,848,318.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 24-FEB-1998 1,848,318.00 1,848,318.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 24-FEB-1998 -1,848,318.00 -1,84B,31B.00 1.000000 S 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-FEB-1998 18,673,046.88 19.673.046.88 206.703125 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 23-FEB-1998 -18,523,258.56 -18,523 258.56 106.703125 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 149.788.32 149:788.32 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,500 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-FEB-1998 362.569.06 362,569.06 106.703125 9DB27D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 106.703125 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TEAM OPER-PINCO -17,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-FEB-1998 19,035,615.94 19,035,615.94 106.703125 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 23-FEB-1998 19,035,615.94 0.00 106.703125 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 23-FEB-2998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 17 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 10,549,687 50 10,549,687.50 106.S62500 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 24-FEB-1998 -10,531,122:66 -10,531,122.66 106.562500 S HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, ----------- 18,564.84 18,S64.84 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 207,161.60 207,161.60 106.562500 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 106.562500 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,900,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 10,756,849.10 10,7S6,849.10 106.562500 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 24-FEB-1998 10,756,849.10 0.00 106.562500 FC HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1998 25,152,875.00 2S,1S2,875.00 103.937500 9128272w1 06.500% 05/31/2002 Do 06/02/97 13-FEB-1998 -24,658.875.18 -24,658,87S.18 103.937500 S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 493,999.82 493,999.82 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1998 324,107.14 324,107.14 103.937500 9128272wl 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 13-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 103.937S00 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 12-FEB-1998 25,476,982.14 25,476,982.14 103.937500 9128272WI 06.S00% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 13-FEB-1998 2S,476,982.14 0.00 103.937500 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 13-FE8-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 1,036,562.SO 1,036,562.SO 103.6562SO 9128272w1 06.500% OS/31/2002 Do 06/02/97 24-FER-1998 -1,036,132.74 -1,036,132.74 103.6S6250 S HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, ----------- 429.76 429.76 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.000.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 15,357.14 15,357.14 103.6S6250 9128272wl 06.500% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 24-FE8-1998 0.00 0.00 103.656250 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-FEB-1998 1,OS1,919.64 1,051,919.64 103.6S6250 Page 18 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1999 TM100 BASE AMO SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COUNT/ ST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ __________________ 9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 24-FEB-1998 1,OS1,919.64 0.00 103.656250 FC HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,250 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 27-IAN-1998 7,324.765 63 7,324,765.63 101.0312SO 994ABY880 7.0009 02/01/2028 12-FEB-199B 7,324,765:63 0.00 101.031250 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 12-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 09-FEB-1998 2,796,845 70 2,786,845.70 101.339844 999ABY880 7.000% 02/01/2028 12-FEB-1998 -2,797,029:30 -2,797,029.30 101.339844 S GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- -10,183.60 -10,183.60 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 09-FEB-1998 2,786,845 70 2,786,845.70 3.01.339844 994ABY880 7.000% 02/01/2028 12-FEB-1998 2,786,845:70 0.00 101.339844 FC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 12-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -263.,723.76 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-6 CL A 1S-FEB-1998 263 723.76 263,723.76 100.000000 161614AE2 5.9DD% 11/25/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-FEB-199B -263:177.77 -263,177.77 1DO.000000 PD ----------- 545.99 545.99 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -263 723.76 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-6 CL A 15-FEB-1998 263,723.76 263,723.76 100.000000 1616l4AE2 5.900% 11/1S/2001 DD 11/25/95 15-FEB-1998 263,723.76 0.00 100.000000 FC 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-FEB-1998 1.00 1.00 100.000000 21075WDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DD 11/23/96 01-FEB-1998 -1.00 -1.00 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-FEB-1998 -1.00 -1.00 100.000000 21075WDKS 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-FEB-1998 1.00 1.00 100.000000 PDC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -423 357.57 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-FEB-1998 423,3S757 423,357.57 100.000000 21675WDK8 6.190% 30/1S/2011 OD IV23/96 01-FEB-1998 -422,448:01 -422.448.01 100.000000 Page 19 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PO ----------- 909.56 909.56 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -423 357.57 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-FEB-1998 423,357.57 423,357.57 100.000000 21b7SNDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-FEB-1998 423,357.S7 0.00 100.000000 FC 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28 988.69 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 1S-FEB-1998 28,988.69 28,988.69 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 1S-FEB-1998 -28,988.69 -28.988.69 100.000000 PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -28,988.69 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 1S-FEB-1998 28 988.69 28,988.69 100.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-FEB-1998 28:988.69 0.00 100.000000 FC 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -242 594.20 GNMA II POOL #0080023 O1-FEB-1998 242,594.20 242,594.20 100.000000 3612SCAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 02-FEB-1998 -246,612.17 -246,612.17 100.000000 PD ----------- -4,017.97 -4,017.97 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 242 594.20 GNMA ii POOL #0080023 01-FEB-1998 -242,S94.20 -242,S94.20 100.000000 36112ScAz9 6.S00% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-FEB-1998 246 612.17 246,612.17 100.000000 PDC ----------- 4:017.97 4,027.97 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -242 585.SS GNMA II POOL #0080023 O1-FEB-1998 242,585 SS 242,585.SS 100.000000 36f25CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-FEB-1998 -246,603:37 -246,603.37 100.000000 PD ----------- -4,017.82 -4,017.82 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 242 585.55 GNMA ii POOL #0080023 O1-FEB-1998 -242,SSS.SS -242,585.SS 100.000000 36'L25CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-FEB-1998 246 603.37 246,603.37 100.000000 POC ----------- 4:017.82 4,017.82 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -242 S8S.55 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-FEB-1998 242,585.55 242,58S.55 100.000000 36f2SCAZ9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-FEB-2998 -246,603.37 -246,603.37 100.000000 PD ----------- -4,017.82 -4,017.82 1.000000000 0.00 Page 20 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -242,585.SS GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-FEB-1998 242,585.55 242,SSS.5S 100.000000 36225CA29 7.000% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-FER-1998 242,SSS.SS 0.00 100.000000 FC 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -104,102.76 GNMA II POOL 080088M 01-FEB-1998 104,102.76 104,102.76 100.000000 3622SCC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-FEB-1998 -106,380:01 -106,380.01 100.000000 PO ----------- -2,277.25 -2,277.2S 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -104,102.76 GNMA II POOL #080088M 01-FEB-1998 104,102.76 104,102.76 100.000000 36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-FEB-1998 104,102.76 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 AMERICAN TEL & TL DISC 23-FEB-1998 1698,976.22 1,699,976.22 100.000000 03018BBP3 02/23/1998 23-FEB-1998 -1:698,976.22 -1,698,976.22 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-FEB-1998 2,371,81800 2,371,818.00 100.000000 31338SSP2 MAT 02/02/1998 02-FEB-1998 -2,371,818:00 -2,371,818.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.D0 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN NTG CORP DISC 20-FEB-1998 2,367,926 00 2,367,926.00 100.000000 3B397TH4 MAT 02/20/1998 20-FEB-1998 -2,367,926:00 -2,367,926.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 20-FEB-1998 0.DO 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 12-FEB-1998 2,987,423.33 2,987,423.33 100.000000 313589Sz7 MAT 02/12/199B 12-FEB-1998 -2,987,423.33 -2,987,423.33 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 12-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 17-FEB-1998 795,137 78 795,137.78 100.000000 3411OBBH3 02/17/1998 17-FEB-1998 -795,137:78 -795,137.78 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 17-FEB-2998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Page 21 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TN100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CORR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ -800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 20-FEB-1998 795,502.44 795,502.44 100.000000 34539UBLS 02/20/1998 20-FEB-1998 -795,502.44 -795,502.44 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN # TR 00491 27-FEB-1998 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 100.000000 81238XUJ8 7.690% 02/27/1998 DO 02/28/95 27-FEB-1998 -1,031,860.00 -1,031 860.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 27-FEB-1998 -31,860.00 -31:860.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 31-JAN-1998 3,400,000.00 3,400,000.00 100.000000 912827J4S 05.525% 01/31/1998 DO 02/01/93 31-JAN-1998 -3,402,921:88 -3,402,921.88 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 31-JAN-1998 -2,921.88 -2,921.88 1.000000000 0.00 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,195,130.00 PRINCIPAL ADJUSTMENT TO 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 0.000000 9128272M3 FEB. 1998 FACTOR 27-FEB-1998 -8,942,983.02 -8,942,993.02 0.000000 SW US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -8,942,983.02 -8,942,983.02 1.000000000 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 AMERICAN TEL & TL DISC 23-FEB-1998 1,023.78 1,023.78 0.000000 03018BBP3 02/23/1998 23-FEB-1998 1,023.78 0.00 0.000000 IT 23-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 263,723.76 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 17-FEB-1998 20,355.71 20,355.71 0.000000 161614AE2 5.900% ll/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 IS-FEB-1998 20,355.71 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 17-FEB-1998 18,054.17 18,054.17 0.000000 21075WDKB 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-FEB-1998 18,054.17 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 02-FEB-1998 28,182.00 28,182.00 0.000000 3133855P2 NAT 02/02/1998 02-FEB-1998 28,192.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 22 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 20-FEB-1998 32.074.00 32,074.00 0.000000 M397TH4 MAT 02/20/1998 20-FEB-1998 32,074.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,000 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 12-FEB-1998 12,57667 12,576.67 0.000000 M589SZ7 MAT 02/12/1998 12-FEB-1998 12,576:67 0.00 0.000000 IT 12-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 20-FEB-1998 282,000.00 282,000.00 0.000000 3B64BWF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DD 02/20/96 20-FEB-1998 282,000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28 988.69 FIFTH THIRD SK AUTO TR 96A CLA 17-FEB-1998 2,771 79 2,771.79 0.000000 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 15-FEB-1998 2,771:79 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 806 000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 17-FEB-1998 4,862.22 4,862.22 0.000000 34ilOBBH3 02/17/1998 17-FEB-1998 4,862.22 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 20-FEB-1998 4,49756 4,497.56 0.000000 34539UBLS 02/20/1998 20-FEB-1998 4,497:56 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN TRANCHE ATR 96 09-FEB-1998 56,345.20 56,345.20 0.000000 345402DZ1 FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DD 11/08/93 08-FEB-1998 S6,345.20 0.00 0.000000 IT 09-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 242 585.55 GNMA II POOL #0080023 20-FEB-1998 25,598.11 25,598.11 0.000000 36125cAz9 7.000% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-FEB-1998 25,S98.11 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 104,102.76 GNMA II POOL M080088M 20-FEB-1998 33.626.01 33,626.01 0.000000 Page 23 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ -------------------- _________________- 36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-FEB-1998 33,626.01 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN #00196 17-FEB-1998 166,250.00 166,250.00 0.000000 52517PID4 6.650% 11/08/2000 DO 11/08/96 15-FEB-1998 166,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 91000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 17-FEB-1998 416,250.00 416,250.00 0.000000 718154882 9.250% 02/15/2000 15-FEB-1998 416,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN # TR 00491 27-FEB-1999 31,187.22 31,187.22 0.000000 81238xU78 7.690% 02/27/1998 DO 02/28/95 27-FEB-1998 31,187.22 0.00 0.000000 IT 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 17-FEB-1998 278,125.00 278,125.00 0.000000 912810DES 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 15-FEB-1998 278,125.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-FEB-1998 95,625.00 95.625.00 0.000000 912827345 OS.625% 01/31/1998 DD 02/01/93 31-IAN-1998 95,625.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-FEB-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-FEB-1998 600,000.00 600,000.00 0.000000 912827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 15-FEB-1998 600,000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 16-IAN-1998 -172,072.69 -172,072.69 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-DEC-1997 -172,072.69 0.00 0.000000 ITC 16-IAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 16-7AN-1998 172,072.69 172,072.69 0.000000 9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-7AN-1998 172,072.69 0.00 0.000000 IT 16-IAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 24 OCS6000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-FEB-1998 - 28-FEB-1998 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 67,970.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 27-FEB-1998 67,970.00 67,970.00 0.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 IS-JAN-1998 67,970.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SNORT TERM FOS INT ADJ 27-FEB-1998 43.50 43.50 0.000000 99000OP34 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 27-FEB-1998 43.50 0.00 0.000000 CD AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 27-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 02-FEB-1998 26.05 26.05 0.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 01-FEB-1998 26.05 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-FEB-1998 2,087.08 2,087.08 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-FEB-1998 2.087.08 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-FEB-1998 S28.54 528.54 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC Il 01-FEB-1998 S28.54 0.00 0.00D000 IT 02-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 25 FAHR COMMITTEE M 31" a Tox aa. 3nuss 3Q't 8 AGENDA REPORT """�"� n°' 'I County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AMENDMENT (FAHR98-21) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve second amendment to County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as amended 1994. SUMMARY The Districts have amended the Deferred Compensation Plan in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457, due to substantial changes caused by the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (H.R. 3448) Pub.L. 104-188. The significant changes are as follows: (1) plan assets must be held in trust no later than January 1, 1999, (2) the $8,000 deferral limit may be increased from time to time due to increases in the cost of living, (3) the plan participants now have a one-time option to defer the commencement date of distributions, (4) the circumstances in which the distribution of small accounts ($3,500 or less) can be accelerated have been changed to permit in-service withdrawals, and (5) participant loans are now permitted. In addition to the Plan changes, the Districts is adding two providers for employees to choose from. In addition to our current Lincoln National provider, the two new providers are Intemational City/County Management Association (ICMA) Retirement Corporation, and Valic. ICMA is a retirement trust that holds more than $7 billion in investment assets of participating employees. Vatic, a variable annuity company that specializes in retirement plans, has more than $32 billion in assets and is largely popular with school districts and water agencies. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) \YY WYl4'V.�d^ Ova,e,FNit4`NWB9W�HIF�XRB1Y1.0.c Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION e The plan amendment adds trust provisions to Section 8 of the plan. Under Section 8, the Districts, as "Employer," becomes the plan trustee and holds the plan assets in a fiduciary capacity on behalf of the plan participants. While this provision is due to changes in the tax law, General Counsel does not believe that it creates any appreciable change in the fiduciary obligations already inherent in the Districts' plan. The plan amendment also provides for an increased deferral limit, when and if permitted by the Secretary of the Treasury, and in-service withdrawals of the amounts accumulated in small accounts, under the circumstances provided in paragraph 8 of the plan amendment (plan Section 10.4). The bulk of the changes to the plan have to do with changes in participant and beneficiary elections. They permit greater flexibility and should be greatly appreciated by the plan participants. Each participant now has the right to make a commencement date election on termination of service, and also has a one-time opportunity to postpone his or her commencement date. In addition, the amendment permits each participant to change his or her payout option election as often as desired, up until the date thirty days before the scheduled commencement date. If desired by the participant, the participant's beneficiary will have the opportunity to change his or her preferred payout option election as well. Although the Districts currently does not offer a loan provision, a loan program was also written into the plan in case the Districts decides to offer loans, as permitted by Section 15, to employees in the future. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution approving amendment to deferred compensation plan for officers and employees. • General Counsel memorandum, Deferred Compensation Plan Amendment. • Exhibit A- Deferred Compensation Plan. MLP %Wa nWablby.Eb1MQIft TAHRTAHR�AWAHRB21 dx RwA lie, Page 2 y RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR THE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICTS WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-39, adopted by the Boards of Directors on April 13, 1994, the Districts approved and adopted the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan'); and, by Resolution No. 95-80, adopted by the Boards of Directors on July 26, 1995, the Districts approved and adopted the first amendment to the Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to amend the Plan in order to comply with changes to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code section 457, enacted into law by the U.S. Congress in 1996 (H.R. 3448) P.L. 104-188. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Defefred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 is hereby further amended as set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though set forth herein at length, and as so amended shall remain in effect until further amended or terminated by Resolution of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1997. ZW 19 4se74 1 Wsds lwB�t 11,1997 FAHR Meeting Date T03rarils 3111/98 03/25/99 AGENDA REPORT Item Vniber t j�, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California ,�(�/ FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration 'r/vjt�/ SUBJECT: 800 MHz LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to enter into a Lease Agreement with the County of Orange for installation of an 800MHz system at Plant No. 2 for a period of twenty (20) years. SUMMARY At the February OMTS meeting, staff received authorization to proceed with entering into a 20- year lease with the County of Orange for the installation of an 800 MHz system at Plant No. 2. Under the terms of that agreement, the County would not pay the Districts any rent in exchange for allowing us to access the 800 MHz system, free of charge. On February 5, 1998 (a day after the OMTS meeting), staff received a phone call from representatives of the County. They informed us that they had begun to receive calls from member cities that were concemed with the terms of our agreement. They also informed us that there appeared to be a misinterpretation of the agreement and that the County did not have the authority to grant the Districts free access to the 800 MHz system. This item was brought back to the March OMTS meeting and discussed. At that meeting, staff was directed to renegotiate the agreement with the County of Orange and to bring the agreement to the March FAHR for their consideration. Attached for your guidance and information is a copy of the revised agreement with the County of Orange. The terms of this agreement are for 20 years. During the term of this agreement, the Districts will receive: $4,200 per year for rent on the site, beginning on the third anniversary of the commencement date of this Lease. The County will purchase, provide and install 2 control stations for our mutual aid use during emergency or disaster operations. The County at no cost will provide the control stations to the District in lieu of rental payments for the first three years of the lease term. One control station each will be installed at each of our plants. Ownership of the control stations will transfer to the District at the end of the third year of the Lease. These control stations will enable the Districts to communicate with local agencies during an emergency. In recognition of the accommodation and support provided by the District, the County will support our application to join the 800 MHz CCCS at a future date on the most favorable terms; acknowledging that the ultimate approval of the application rests with the 800 MHz Governance Committee. Also attached for your information, is a copy of a letter that staff received from Allan Roeder, Chairman of the 800 MHz Public Safety Communications Governance Committee. Included in H1v fte .Re My FMR0. RFm.e, vsna Page 1 this attachment is information on the other leases that the County has entered into for the 800 MHz System backbone. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will present a brief verbal report. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The Districts will receive an annual Lease payment of$4,200.00, beginning on the third anniversary of the commencement date of this Lease. The value of the two (2) control stations and the emergency access to the 800 MHz system is estimated to be worth $15,000.00. Within the next three to five years, the Districts will need to make a decision on their level of participation (if any) in the 800 MHz system. Should the Districts choose to participate in the 800 MHz system, they will be required to pay for a portion of the backbone. At the present time, the total cost for this participation has not been identified. Also, monies will need to be budgeted to cover the purchase of new portable, mobile and base station radio equipment as our existing radios can not be converted to this new system. This money is currently not budgeted and will need to be included in the CORF budget during the year that it will be incurred. Additionally, there will be and annual fee that will need to be budgeted annually, to pay for routine maintenance and improvements on the 800 MHz system. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES 1. As was discussed at the February and March OMTS meetings, the Districts may elect to not participate in the 800 MHz system and instead may choose another telecommunication option. 2. Not to build the tower. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS EEH: fw H%waraVaaMlQJWp 'O MHMB MHaP Wda Re Mar FMRUrc R.,,. L9 Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE N ngoate TOXM. 3111/98 3/25/98 AGENDA REPORT Ram NUMW IW)V*W County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Don McIntyre, General Manager Originator: Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: FY 1997/98 JOINT OPERATING LEGAL FEES UPDATE (FAHR98-22) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file. This is an information item only. SUMMARY Prior to this fiscal year, the Joint Operating (J.O.) costs for legal expenses have been on the increase. In fiscal year 1995/96 J.O. legal expenses were approximately $600,000. In FY 1996197, J.O. legal expenses exceeded the budget by 28% and totaled $772,000. Although a large portion of this increase was due to the Workplace Investigation, the escalating legal expenses required us to further evaluate our ability to contain such costs. Through a cooperative effort with Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart, the Districts revisited the J.O. legal program. The FY 1997/98 J.O. legal budget was set at $450,000-40% less than last year's actual expenses. In order to meet this budget, several processes and procedures were changed including: • Centralizing the J.O. legal budget in the General Manager's Office to provide for frequent and consistent monitoring of legal expenditures. • A revision of the Districts' and Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart's billing and accounting system. This allowed us to better allocate and track legal costs among Joint Operating, CORF and other budgets. • More extensive use of a Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart paralegal with regular office hours on-site. This allowed routine legal advice to be conveniently sought and provided at reduced hourly rates. These modifications, and others, have significantly contributed to our success in containing J.O. legal expenses this fiscal year. As of January 31, 1998, legal expenses totaled $213,000 or 47% of the FY 97/98 budget through seven months. This represents a major success in J.O. legal cost containment. N.Mn��e«b.ttwe,tim m.b nw.a.A.wpmxsentu.as R..;.aa 1� Page 1 Next fiscal year we expect to budget the same costs for the Joint Operating legal budget. This 0% increase represents a continued commitment on the part of Districts management and Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart to provide effective legal services at the most reasonable cost. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Not applicable. ALTERNATIVES Not applicable. CEOA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS None. GM I[Mq.Jb'pwW\tWJ hM&rE�pwW PgyvY`�1NJ¢ n....e „:,,, Page 2 PDC COMMITTEE "me AWN AGENDA REPORT ern NumW I Ib�jfymbe County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California ..S FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. SUBJECT: Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve Change Order No. 3 to Job No. P1-51 (Rebid)with AirPol Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of NTE (not to exceed) $295,000.00. 2. Grant 444 calendar days time extension for completion of the additional work. 3. Approve an increase in authorized funds of$295,000.00 to cover anticipated costs for the purchase and installation of a new natural gas compressor skid package. The revised project total will be $1,503,400.00. These additional funds, if authorized, will be included in the 1998-1999 CORF budget for this project. SUMMARY Change Order No. 3 is a request for preapproval to purchase a new natural gas compressor skid package through the project installation Contractor, AirPol Construction. Purchase of a new gas compressor skid is necessary to complete the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station. The Pt-51 (Rebid) project included the installation of a compressor package unit, prepurchased by the Districts. The Districts compressor supplier, PennWiilson CGN has refused to deliver the specified equipment constructed for this project. This has increased the project budget and delayed the project. The Districts is proceeding with litigation to recover all monies paid to PennWiilson CNG and other associated costs. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) JF:k O M1kG.Ny.gv On11 R�gN'YCGV�St liw.W c R..Y.O: ,exe Page 1 Approval of Change Order No. 3 will increase the total amount of authorized funds for J. this project by $295,000.00. The Districts total contract with PennWilson CNG was $251,495.00. Manufacturing of the equipment was completed and the Districts, per contract, paid $176,047.00 to PennWilsonCNG. The Districts presently retains the balance of$75,448.00. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION On December 8, 1997, PennWilson CNG refused to deliver to the Districts a natural gas compressor package unit, which had been prepurchased by the Districts and custom- built to the Districts specifications. The Districts installation Contractor, AirPol Construction was therefore unable to complete the project within their contract time limitation. During the month of January 1998, the Districts General Counsel attempted to negotiate with PennWilson CNG to either take delivery of the completed compressor package unit or obtain a reimbursement of monies paid to PennWilson CNG per the contract. These negotiations were unsuccessful. On February 17, 1998, the Districts filed a complaint in Superior Court against PennWilson CNG and their parent company Penn Octane Corporation to recover monies paid to PennWilson CNG and other damages. The Districts are pursuing litigation against PennWilson CNG to recover all costs associated with the purchase and installation of this equipment. These additional costs include the purchase of a new compressor package, direct delay costs, extension of insurance policies and other costs incurred by the installation Contractor. After Board approval, the installation Contractor will require 205 calendar days time extension to the contract to manufacture and install a new compressor package. The installation Contractor also requires an additional 239 calendar days time extension to the contract as a result of the District's inability to take delivery of the compressor package. The installation Contractor was requested to postpone starting the project due to delays in PennWilson's fabrications and delivery schedule. During negotiations for this change order AirPol Construction has agreed that the Districts will not be subject to extended overhead or other delay costs associated with the Districts failure to supply the gas compressor package for the project, At the regular PDC meeting on March 5, 1998, the Committee voted to submit this item for consideration by the Board of Directors at their regularly scheduled meeting of March 25, 1998. ALTERNATIVES Delay approval of Change Order No. 3 pending outcome of litigation against PennWilson CNG and Penn Octane Corporation. Continuing delays in completing the Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station will affect present agreements with SCAOMD, Pima Gro and the Gas Company. CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption filed in August 1996. Jf k G NrpbWNgeMar pilr Fe�ornVOLV151Nr Ox Page 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 3 nx G NipleWM arO ft R.pm4W 51 MrCz R...w. 1 s Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS REFUELING STATION Job No. P1-51R ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSEDTOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) GasCo Desi n/Insp $ 94,500 S 114,500 S 114,500 $ 114,500 S 100,000 87% Purchased Equipment 1 $ 399300 S 328866 $ 326,866 $ 326,1166 $ 251418 77% GasCo Equipment 3 55000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55000 100% Installation Contract S 428074 $ 663856 S 295.000 $ 958.856 $ 663,856 S 295,000 $ 958856 $ 506987 76% Districts Stag 1 $ - $ 170,000 $ 170,000 S 170,000 $ 150,000 88% AQMD Contribution $ (50,000 $ (50,000 $ (50,000) 4 (50,000) E (50,000) 1D0% GasCo Contribution S 89 500 S (105,000) Is (105,000) $ 105,000 $ (105,000) 100% Soils,Survey,Legal $ 8,000 $ 8.000 $ 8,000 1 $ 8,000 100% Contingency $ 25,178 $ 25,178 $ 25,178 $ - 5 - $ 12,388 49% TOTAL $ 835,374 1 $ 1,208,400 1 $ 295,00 $$ 1503400 S 1,208,400 S 295,000 $ 1,503,400 S 916,405 76% Hmp4t%wn\anoTi.51Rshgor4e;bNdg lbi.W3 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS REFUELING STATION Job No. P1.51r APPROVAL CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 12/18/96 $663,856.00 $663,856 140 140 CO NO. 1 2111/98 $12,388.00 $676,244 1 87% 0 140 CO NO. 2 Proposed•GM $0.00 $676,244 1.87% 0 140 CO NO. 3 Proposed $295,000.00 $971,244 1 46.30% 1 400 1 540 *Proposed Change Order No. 2 is to reduce Progress Payment retention from 10%to 5% K:wpdta`e,QOBSandCONTRACTSI l 516changwrdems hgststvls Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Airpol Construction C.O. No .: Three (3) Date: March 25, 1998 Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station Job No. P1-51 R Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Qsduet) $ 295,000.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — PURCHASE NEW NATURAL GAS COMPRESSOR SKID The Contractor is directed to furnish a new natural gas compressor package unit for the Districts' compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station. The new compressor shall be rated at 465scfm on an average inlet pressure of 325 psi. Motor horsepower shall be 125 HP. The compressor shall meet specifications as described in a proposal to AirPol Construction from IMW Atlas dated January 6, 1998 and supplement dated February 19, 1998. The compressor package skid shall include space heaters for both compressor motors and a control panel modem. The compressor skid shall be fully tested prior to delivery at the manufacturer's facility per IMW Atlas proposal supplement dated February 19, 1998. Included in this Rem are the costs involved with demobilization, remobilization, additional project insurance, additional electrical and mechanical work associated with the delivery delay of the Districts'prepurchased equipment. A milestone date of September 11, 1998 has been established for delivery of the compressor package unit to the Districts' installation site at Plant No. 1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85, the Contractor agrees to pay the Districts a sum of $500 per day for liquidated damages, not as a penalty, for each day the compressor package delivery is delayed beyond the milestone date. The Contractor has agreed that no extended overhead associated with non-delivery of the Districts' prepurchased equipment will be charged to the project. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10- 6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH No. 4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 295,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 444 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 q COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Airpol Construction C.O. No .: Three (3) Date: March 25, 1998 Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51R TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 295,000.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 444 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: March 12, 1997 Original Contract Time: 140 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: July 29, 1997 Time Extension this C.O.: 444 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 444 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 584 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 16, 1998 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 663,856.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 12,388.00 This Change Changes (Add) $ 295,000.00 Amended Contract Price $ 971,244.00 Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Airpol Construction C.O. No .: Three (3) Date: March 25, 1998 Job: Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51R Board Authorization Date: March 25, 1998 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Approved as to Form: Director of Engineering Date Contract/Purchasing Manager Date Accepted by: AIRPOL CONSTRUCTION Contractor Date Mwp.dlabngUOBS 8 CONTRACTS%PI-51R1changeordems C002.doc County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California f P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEE MEETING OF DISTRICT NO. 2 Wednesday, February 18. 1998 at 2:00 p.m. A meeting of the Selection Committee of the County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California was held on February 18, 1998, at 2:00 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present: Staff Present: Norman Z. Eckenrode Blake P. Anderson Mark A. Murphy David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Collins Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Barry Denes Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Andrei loan, Engineer APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR Norm Eckenrode was appointed as Chair for the Selection Committee Meeting of February 18, 1998. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Project Manager made a presentation of the project, Consultant's familiarity with the project, and explained the scope of work and why the project implementation is a critical safety issue. He then presented the project budget and schedule, and requested that Holmes & Narver be sole-sourced to provide engineering services. ACTION ITEM Receive and file Selection Committee Certification and approve Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver to prepare an alignment study for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, in an amount not to exceed $199,077. 1 Minutes of the Selection Committee of County Sanitation District No. 2 Page 2 February 18, 1998 DISCUSSION: The Selection Committee asked routine questions about the project budget and consultant's ability to perform the work. The Section Committee expressed support for the project. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS. OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 2:45 p.m. Submitted by: l ��G✓ Gail Cain Selection Committee Secretary :gc H MP DTFIENGIENGV.41\SELL0M MIN JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meetlng DaM I To E.MS. o3�ss�ge AGENDA REPORT �mNumxr ��u�xr County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of EngineerIig, y Prepared by: Andrei loan, Engineer SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR REALIGNMENT AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 2-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Receive and file Selection Committee letter. 2. Approve the budget transfer from Contract No. 2-14-5R2 in the amount of $4.603,692. 3. Approve an additional budget of$7,260.308 for a total project budget of $11,864,000. 4. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver to prepare the alignment study and report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protection, Contract No. 2-41 for an amount not to exceed $199,077 and $55,000 expenditure to cover internal cost for a total of $254,077. SUMMARY The SARI line is in part located in the Santa Ana riverbed and was constructed in 1975. The pipeline was designed to perform under the river flow conditions considered adequate at the time. Presently, the Corps of Engineers is in process of raising the Prado Dam by 30 feet, which will increase the flow discharge capability from 5,000 to 30,000 cubic feet per second (CFS). The pipeline and manholes, as presently installed, may fail in an extraordinary flood event due to erosion of the river bottom. This will occur when the Corps of Engineers releases large flows from the Prado Dam reservoir (up to 30,000 CFS). Such failure would allow sand, silt and debris into the pipe, and eventually into the headworks at Plant No. 1 and/or Plant No. 2, depending on how the sewer flow is diverted at that time. The Holmes & Narver realignment and protection study will provide recommendations for more reliable and permanent means to provide adequate protection of Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 by relocating the SARI line and/or protecting vulnerable sections of the pipeline and manholes in place. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Alphanumeric encoding is no longer acceptable due to the implementation of the new FIS system. Therefore a new contract number (2-41) was issued to continue HM ft*M *NGU41U41 MR JeiMe rCa3l NY Lntp MW=M83.OPM Page 1 the work on the project. Staff recommends that the $4,603,692 remaining budget I' (from 2-14-5R2) be transferred to the new Contract No. 2-41. Contract 2-41 is a new project and no PSA and or other contracts have been issued in connection with it. The original project budget (2-24-5R2)was prepared prior to the preliminary cost estimate included in the Holmes & Narver report. The report lead to a better definition of the scope of work and construction budgetary cost estimates. The budget also has had to be increased to account for the change in Districts overhead allocation (from 60% to 150%). For a breakdown of the proposed budget refer to the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT Transfer $4,603,692 from Contract 2-14-5R Add $7,260,308 for a total project budget of$11,864,000. ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: District No. 2, CIP/Reliability, line 2) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted, ❑ Not applicable (information item) Contract 2-41 has not been budgeted in previous years. However its purpose is to continue and expand the work started under Contract 2-14-5R2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI), one of District No. 2's trunk sewer lines, generally parallels the Santa Ana River from the Orange/San Bernardino County line to Plant 1, a distance of approximately 23 miles. The SARI line also serves Riverside and San Bernardino Counties under the administration of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA). SAWPA has a peak capacity right of 30 mgd in the SARI line downstream of the San Bernardino/Orange County line. The SARI line, extending east from the Weir Canyon Road to the OC/SBD County line, runs mostly within the Santa Ana River floodplain and crosses the river bottom at several locations. When the SARI line was constructed in 1975, it was buried about 15 to 20 feet below the then existing riverbed elevation. It was assumed that the depth would be adequate to avoid any damage to the pipeline from future riverbed degradation. In addition, it was anticipated that access to manhole structures was adequate for ordinary inspection and maintenance. Streambed degradation over a period of 20 years is now posing a threat of structural damage to the pipeline and access to the manholes has become difficult due to heavy vegetative growth. In addition, further riverbed degradation is anticipated due to increased discharge flows from Prado Dam. The flows discharged could be as MW N"k@N VAm<1 MR Jwm BwmasnBB.hc Lost p,,,n.a DVIM au cM Page 2 v high as 30,000 CFS after the dam upgrade is competed by the Corps of Engineers. An extensive scour (soil erosion due to river flow) analysis was performed in 1996 to determine the extent of potential damages to the SARI line under the increased flows discharged from Prado Dam. Holmes & Narver prepared the report under Contract No. 2-14-5R2. The report indicated that the Santa Ana riverbed has already degraded by about six to eight feet due to flooding and entrapment of sediment in the Prado Dam Reservoir, located just northeast of the OC/SBD County line. Consequently, there has been significant scour near the manholes and the depth of cover over the pipeline has been reduced to about five to six feet at several pipe crossing locations. In addition, significant erosion will occur when flows up to 30,000 ds;will be released from the dam after the dam is raised by the Corps of Engineers. According to the report, the SARI line may be washed out at several locations and some manholes may be completely exposed and very likely destroyed. Any damage to manholes would allow a devastating influx of sand and debris into the SARI line with partially destructive consequences to CSDOC Plant No. 1 and/or Plant No. 2. The large amount of silt, sand and debris that could enter the SARI line (in case of a washout) would induce a significant blockage at the headworks large enough to potentially render Plant No. 1 and/or Plant No. 2 inoperable for days. The scour analysis report indicates two preliminary alternatives to mitigate the risk of the SARI pipeline washout. The first option is to completely relocate the SARI line outside of the Santa Ana riverbed. The preliminary construction cost of this alternative ranges between $7,400,000 and $8,600,000, depending on the type of pipe used. Based on the conclusions of the scour analysis report, the project scope for this project will be to study alternatives to reduce the construction cost and to address specific design issues such as the feasibility of pipeline installation on the north side of the railroad tracks near the Green River Golf Course and custom manhole sealing. Several alternatives will be examined: • Protect the SARI line in place. • Relocate the SARI line completely out of the Santa Ana River flood area. • Protect portions of the line and relocate the balance. The study will present and justify the design and construction cost to agencies such as SAWPA and the County of Orange, Corps of Engineers, and will provide a breakdown of respective cost sharing between SAWPA and CSDOC for the design and construction of project alternatives. The total project cost is estimated to be $11,864,000, including studies, preliminary and final design and construction implementation. $4,603,692 of the aforementioned amount has been approved in prior fiscal years for Contract No. 2-14-5R2 and can be reallocated to Contract No. 2-41. Contract No. 241 is currently scheduled to begin in March 1998 and to be completed at the end of 2001, including the design and construction of the relocated and/or protected SARI line. NMp.W Wg1EN01]J1VJl qlq Jdnl BppMt1]SpO.ps unpnnwon+ve 3a M Page P ALTERNATIVES Will be defined and evaluated in the alignment study and report. The report will also indicate the cost effectiveness of each alternative. The "No action" alternative will allow the SARI line to be vulnerable to failure. CEQA FINDINGS It is planned for a mitigated Negative Declaration to be produced coincident with the design of the project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Staff Evaluation — Proposal to perform Consulting Services 3. Consultant's Proposal 4. Selection Committee Certification Letter DAL:ai XMAlaWAOWNG1$ M-41 AR.b IkAMsInOOd2 NM dls"%N I24IV41 AIR JoiM&AAA 4 08 d¢ LW RdoG'd W/1IY98349RM Page 4 s BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protection Contract No. 241 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECWTASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET ' REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET' BUDGET' INCREASE' BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design Consultant PSA $ $ 818,000 $ - $ 199077 $ 199.077 4 CSDOC Staff $ $ 1,875,225 $ - $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 4344 Construction Contrail $ $ 7,800,000 $ - $ - $ - , $ Contrail 2-14-5R2 $ 5.052.000 $ 4,603.692 $ 448,308 $ - $ 44#$ 448,1308 10% Other $ 1370,775 $ - $ - $TOTAL $ 5,052.000 $ 4,603,692 $ 7,260,308 $ 11.864,000 $ 448 308 $ 254,077 $ 70 , ,652 10% Not applicable. The budget was adopted before the implementation of the Financial Information System (FIS), and at the time Budgets were not allocated by phase and object account number. H:aro.4a'enarnav<tast budwttnrow.» lastl` M :2ffl=a19:37W W Attachment 2. STAFF EVALUATION PROPOSAL TO PERFORM CONSULTING SERVICES FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR REALIGNMENT AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 2-41 In November 1996 Holmes & Narver(H&N) prepared an extensive study of the Santa Ana River riverbed in conjunction with the subject sections of the SARI line. The study was commissioned by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) under Contract No. 2-15-5R2. By successfully completing this study H&N acquired an invaluable amount of local expertise focused on the Santa Ana River in the proposed project area. This virtually eliminates the "learning curve" associated with any other engineering firm. H&N has extensive related experience with other projects on the Santa Ana River such as the design of two inflatable rubber dams for the Orange County Water District (OCWD), diversion gates, bypass channels and metering devices at each dam location. The combined project cost is on the order of$5 million for construction. The H&N Team assisted OCWD with Section 404 and 1601 permits. Similar permits will be required for the construction of the SARI line realignment and/or protection. The H&N recent experience with the permitting process will help expedite the project completion. H&N has the ability to add to their design team the services of Mr. Carl Nelson, who has more than 36 years of public works experience in Southern California and held the position of Director of Public Works for the County of Orange/EMA for 14 years. He was responsible for the planning, scheduling, design, construction, operations and maintenance of all County-funded flood control and drainage facilities. Mr. Nelson worked with numerous cities and special districts during his County career while implementing projects. He has directed the design and construction of dozens of flood control and water conservation facilities. Mr. Nelson's background highly qualifies him to assist CSDOC with meetings and presentations to SAWPA and all other agencies such as California Fish & Game, U.S. Fish & Wildlife, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Orange County Public Works with respect to funding or regulatory approvals. CSDOC staff recommends that Holmes & Nerver be sole-sourced to perform the engineering services for Contract No. 2-41, for a not to exceed amount of $199,077. Al:jee H:Wp.dl nglENG12-41@-41 AgeMa AdachmeW 2.dx 1 law onw.aomwaea al.un HN SCHEDULE RECEIVED d ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Holmes&Narver GcC 1997 December 1, 1997 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Mr. David A. Ludwin,P.E. ORANGE COUNTY Director of Engineering County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR REALIGNMENT STUDY OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR,CONTRACT NO.2-41 Dear Mr. Ludwin: Per your letter dated November 18, 1997, we are pleased to present the following fee proposal for professional services to be rendered in accordance with the Scope of Work described in your letter. Our fee is based on the attached Billing Rate Schedule and Fee Estimate table. • Engineering/Consulting Services at our direct labor hourly rates plus 166%overhead ................................... $179,254.00 • Profit @ 9.65%............................................................................$ 17,298.00 • Travel,repro,telephone, etc. .................................................... $ 525.00 • Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation (Subconsultant : AGRA Earth& Environmental) ............... S 2.000.00 TOTAL CONTRACT...............................................................$199,077.00 Please note that because of several uncertainties involved,Task 6, Soils/Geotechnical Study has not been included in the fee proposal at this time. After completing the alternatives study, a separate task order may be negotiated for the Soils/Geotechncal Study. Mr. Carl Nelson will be performing the quality control reviews and comadinate with all the regulatory agencies including assistance for permits preparation. It has been a pleasure providing our professional services on the Phase I of the SARIS Project and we look forward to working with you on this new contract. Sincerely, C� C. T. Bathala, Ph.D., P. E. Director, Water Resources Enclosures Post Office Box 6240,Orange,CA 92863-6240 999 Town B Country Road, Orange,CA 92868-4786 Fax(714)567-2441 (714)567-2400 F:\usem\dl9D\bathla\saris\ltr4.doc , HN Holmes 4 Ntuver Realignment Study for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer(Contract No. 2-41) FEE ESTIMATE Task Number Task Description No. of Hours Amount 1 Realignment Study a) Alt. A and B Combination of 364 $28,169 SARI Line b) Alt. C,Two parallel SARI Lines 578 $41,649 c) Alt. D,Complete SARI relocation with tunnels,pumping stations and lateral connections,etc. 518 $41,325 d) Additional Protection of Manholes 132 $11,009 2 Meet&Confer with Reg. Agencies 90 $9,028 (6 Meetings+Prepare minutes,etc.) 3. Meetings with SAWPA& County, and Railroad Company 72 $7,591 (6 Meetings+Prep.minutes,etc.) 4. Prepare Prel. Design Report a) 50%Report 144 $12,026 b) 85%Report+Response to comments 100 $ 8,432 c) 100%Report+Resp.to comments 68 $ 6,339 5. Draft Description for EIR 80 $ 7,844 7. Progress Mtgs(4 Mtgs+Minutes) 56 $ 5,842 Subtotal 2202 $179,254 Profit @ 9.65% $ 17,298 Other Direct Costs(Telephone,Repro,Travel, etc.) $ 525 Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation of Alternatives ($ub one It nt• AGRA Earth & nvirn men aU S 2,000 TOTAL CONTRACT (W/O Borings& Geotech Study) $199,077 Post Office Box 6240.Orange,CA 92863-6240 999 To"&Country Roao.Orange.CA 928684786 Fax(714)567-2441 (714)567-2400 F:\wersW190\bath1a\sarisVtr4.doc HN Holmes A Narlrer HOLMES &NARVER, INC. BILLING RATE SCHEDULE for 1997-1998 Professional Catesory Billing Rate* Project Manager $130.82 Project Engineer $102.30 Structural Engineer $ 98.34 Electrical/Mechanical Engineer $ 94.54 Environmental Specialist $ 99.64 Civil Engineer $ 60.54 CADD Designer $ 60.54 Cost Estimator $ 60.54 Word Processor/Secretary $ 45.54 * Profit Not Included Post Office Box 6240,Orange,CA 92863-6240 999 Town&Country Road.Orange.CA 92868-4786 Fax(714)567-2441 (714)567-2400 F:\users\d 190\bathl a\saris\Itr4.doc COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA t 4 February 18, 1998 phone: (714)9622411 Board of Directors means address: County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County 27 Fo.nzan Valley.'CA 10844 Ellis Avenue 92728b127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 atreat add.: 10844 81is Avenue Fountain valley,CA Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for the Professional Services 92706-701e Agreement with Holmes & Narver in Connection with Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protection, Contract No. 241 Member In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional Agendas � engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee Dwe. for the Professional Service Agreement with Holmes & Narver, providing the engineering services in connection with Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment Anaheim Brea and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, on an hourly rate basis including labor plus Buena Park overhead, plus subconsultants' fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed Cypress $199,077. Fountain Valley PoH.rton Huntington Beach Professional Irvin. Le Habra Services La Palma Los Alamitos Agreement Newport Beech Orange Placentia Engineering/Consulting Services at our direct labor s ei each hourly rates plus 166% overhead.................................................$ 179,254.00 Stanton Tustin Villa Perk Profit @ 9.65% .............................................................................$ 17,298.00 Yorbe Linde County at Orange Travel, repro, telephone, etc.........................................................$ 525.00 sanitary Districts Geotechnical Subcontractor......_.................................................$ 2,000.00 Costs Mesa TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed $ 199,077.00 Md.,City water Districts Irvine Hench A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954 6 Board of Directors District No. 2 Page 2 February 18, 1998 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for services to be performed, and that the said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Orman ck a John ,ollin oint Chair Chair, ' rict No. 2 s ' No. 2 Selection Committee Selection Committee L � rk A. Murphy Barry De s Vice Chair, District o 2 District o. 2 Selection Committee Selection Committee � J David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering DAUAL:gc \VeodWalo2lwp.dla4ng\ENGl2-4015eleclion Committee Uctluc JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meeting Ton.ea:. ( 51L AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Nu r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California ��I LW FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of EngineerlYg Prepared by: Andrei loan, Engineer SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR REALIGNMENT AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 2-41 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Receive and file Selection Committee letter. 2. Approve the budget transfer from Contract No. 2-14-5R2 in the amount of $4,603,692. 3. Approve an additional budget of$7,260,308 for a total project budget of $11,864,000. 4. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver to prepare the alignment study and report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protection, Contract No. 2-41 for an amount not to exceed $199,077 and $55,000 expenditure to cover internal cost for a total of $254,077. SUMMARY The SARI line is in part located in the Santa Ana riverbed and was constructed in 1975. The pipeline was designed to perform under the river flow conditions considered adequate at the time. Presently, the Corps of Engineers is in process of raising the Prado Dam by 30 feet, which will increase the flow discharge capability from 5,000 to 30,000 cubic feet per second (CFS). The pipeline and manholes, as presently installed, may fail in an extraordinary flood event due to erosion of the river bottom. This will occur when the Corps of Engineers releases large flows from the Prado Dam reservoir (up to 30,000 CFS). Such failure would allow sand, silt and debris into the pipe, and eventually into the headworks at Plant No. 1 and/or Plant No. 2, depending on how the sewer flow is diverted at that time. The Holmes & Narver realignment and protection study will provide recommendations for more reliable and permanent means to provide adequate protection of Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 by relocating the SARI line and/or protecting vulnerable sections of the pipeline and manholes in place. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Alphanumeric encoding is no longer acceptable due to the implementation of the new FIS system. Therefore a new contract number (2-41) was issued to continue H:\A,dWbngIRNGV411241 AIR Jo,nl B Ws 3.2&N.dc �..n Pnnt.0119'e9 34l and Page 1 the work on the project. Staff recommends that the $4,603,692 remaining budget ' (from 2-14-5R2) be transferred to the new Contract No. 241. Contract 2-41 is a new project and no PSA and or other contracts have been issued in connection with it. The original project budget (2-24-5R2)was prepared prior to the preliminary cost estimate included in the Holmes & Narver report. The report lead to a better definition of the scope of work and construction budgetary cost estimates. The budget also has had to be increased to account for the change in Districts overhead allocation (from 60% to 150%). For a breakdown of the proposed budget refer to the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT Transfer $4,603,692 from Contract 2-14-5R Add $7,260,308 for a total project budget of$11,864,000. ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: District No.2, CIP/Reliability, line 2) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Contract 2-41 has not been budgeted in previous years. However its purpose is to continue and expand the work started under Contract 2-14-5R2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI), one of District No. 2's trunk sewer lines, generally parallels the Santa Ana River from the Orange/San Bernardino County line to Plant 1, a distance of approximately 23 miles. The SARI line also serves Riverside and San Bernardino Counties under the administration of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA). SAWPA has a peak capacity right of 30 mgd in the SARI line downstream of the San Bernardino/Orange County line. The SARI line, extending east from the Weir Canyon Road to the OC/SBD County line, runs mostly within the Santa Ana River floodplain and crosses the river bottom at several locations. When the SARI line was constructed in 1975, it was buried about 15 to 20 feet below the then existing riverbed elevation. It was assumed that the depth would be adequate to avoid any damage to the pipeline from future riverbed degradation. In addition, it was anticipated that access to manhole structures was adequate for ordinary inspection and maintenance. Streambed degradation over a period of 20 years is now posing a threat of structural damage to the pipeline and access to the manholes has become difficult due to heavy vegetative growth. In addition, further riverbed degradation is anticipated due to increased discharge flows from Prado Dam. The flows discharged Could be as X My gdpglENGVJ1Vd1.Wi J}MBONi 3'$S99.hS 1➢51 pnnlMO}/1b9B]l]PM Page 2 high as 30,000 CFS after the dam upgrade is competed by the Corps of Engineers. An extensive scour (soil erosion due to river flow) analysis was performed in 1996 to determine the extent of potential damages to the SARI line under the increased flows discharged from Prado Dam. Holmes & Narver prepared the report under Contract No. 2-14-5R2. The report indicated that the Santa Ana riverbed has already degraded by about six to eight feet due to flooding and entrapment of sediment in the Prado Dam Reservoir, located just northeast of the OC/SBD County line. Consequently, there has been significant scour near the manholes and the depth of cover over the pipeline has been reduced to about five to six feet at several pipe crossing locations. In addition, significant erosion will occur when flows up to 30,000 cfs will be released from the dam after the dam is raised by the Corps of Engineers. According to the report, the SARI line may be washed out at several locations and some manholes may be completely exposed and very likely destroyed. Any damage to manholes would allow a devastating influx of sand and debris into the SARI line with partially destructive consequences to CSDOC Plant No. 1 and/or Plant No. 2. The large amount of silt, sand and debris that could enter the SARI line (in case of a washout) would induce a significant blockage at the headworks large enough to potentially render Plant No. 1 and/or Plant No. 2 inoperable for days. The scour analysis report indicates two preliminary alternatives to mitigate the risk of the SARI pipeline washout. The first option is to completely relocate the SARI line outside of the Santa Ana riverbed. The preliminary construction cost of this alternative ranges between $7,400,000 and $8,600,000, depending on the type of pipe used. Based on the conclusions of the scour analysis report, the project scope for this project will be to study alternatives to reduce the construction cost and to address specific design issues such as the feasibility of pipeline installation on the north side of the railroad tracks near the Green River Golf Course and custom manhole sealing. Several alternatives will be examined: • Protect the SARI line in place. • Relocate the SARI line completely out of the Santa Ana River flood area. • Protect portions of the line and relocate the balance. The study will present and justify the design and construction cost to agencies such as SAWPA and the County of Orange, Corps of Engineers, and will provide a breakdown of respective cost sharing between SAWPA and CSDOC for the design and construction of project alternatives. The total project cost is estimated to be $11,864,000, including studies, preliminary and final design and construction implementation. $4,603,692 of the aforementioned amount has been approved in prior fiscal years for Contract No. 2-14-5R2 and can be reallocated to Contract No. 241. Contract No. 241 is currently scheduled to begin in March 1998 and to be completed at the end of 2001, including the design and construction of the relocated and/or protected SARI line. H:F .C•Mn0ENW-4I$<,AIR M I Bm,ef InH WL L.11wBL.3 vM Page ALTERNATIVES Will be defined and evaluated in the alignment study and report. The report will also indicate the cost effectiveness of each alternative. The "No action" alternative will allow the SARI line to be vulnerable to failure. CEQA FINDINGS It is planned for a mitigated Negative Declaration to be produced coincident with the design of the project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Staff Evaluation — Proposal to perform Consulting Services 3. Consultant's Proposal 4. Selection Committee Certification Letter DAL:ai w w,pmt,y�twvJ,aJ,uq.�.nem.e.SSB9G¢ X�pC1�Op1ENG1]J1VJ1 AX JtiMBwNs13SB9.G¢ �+„wmnaso3ac�, Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protection Contract No. 241 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTrrASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATIONS TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET' BUDGET' INCREASE' BUDGET TO DATE, REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design Consultant PSA) $ S 818,000 $ - $ 199,077 $ 199.077 $ CSDOC Staff $ $ 1,875,225 $ - S 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 4,344 Construction Contract $ S 7,800,000 ` $ - $ - $ - $ Contract 2-14-5R2 $ 5.052,000 $ 4.603.692 $ 448,308 $. . $ 448,308 $ 448,308 10% Other $ 1,370.775 �. E $.— - $ - Is TOTAL $ 5,052.000 $ 4,603,692 $ 7.260,308. $ 11,864,000 $ 448308 $ 254,077 $ 702,385 1 $ 452,652 10% Not applicable. The budget was adopted before the implementation of the Financial Information System (FIS), and at the time Budgets were not allocated by phase and object account number. M:My.4bbn9bng17<1 C41 bu49si Into 1El.xls lastPm ,J-19I9999:37AM Attachment 2. STAFF EVALUATION PROPOSAL TO PERFORM CONSULTING SERVICES FOR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR REALIGNMENT AND PROTECTION CONTRACT NO. 2-41 In November 1996 Holmes & Narver(H&N) prepared an extensive study of the Santa Ana River riverbed in conjunction with the subject sections of the SARI line. The study was commissioned by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) under Contract No. 2-15-5R2. By successfully completing this study H&N acquired an invaluable amount of local expertise focused on the Santa Ana River in the proposed project area. This virtually eliminates the "learning curve" associated with any other engineering firm. H&N has extensive related experience with other projects on the Santa Ana River such as the design of two inflatable rubber dams for the Orange County Water District (OCWD), diversion gates, bypass channels and metering devices at each dam location. The combined project cost is on the order of$5 million for construction. The H&N Team assisted OCWD with Section 404 and 1601 permits. Similar permits will be required for the construction of the SARI line realignment and/or protection. The H&N recent experience with the permitting process will help expedite the project completion. H&N has the ability to add to their design team the services of Mr. Carl Nelson, who has more than 36 years of public works experience in Southern California and held the position of Director of Public Works for the County of Orange/EMA for 14 years. He was responsible for the planning, scheduling, design, construction, operations and maintenance of all County-funded flood control and drainage facilities. Mr. Nelson worked with numerous cities and special districts during his County career while implementing projects. He has directed the design and construction of dozens of flood control and water conservation facilities. Mr. Nelson's background highly qualifies him to assist CSDOC with meetings and presentations to SAWPA and all other agencies such as California Fish & Game, U.S. Fish &Wildlife, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Orange County Public Works with respect to funding or regulatory approvals. CSDOC staff recommends that Holmes & Narver be sole-sourced to perform the engineering services for Contract No. 241, for a not to exceed amount of $199,077. AI:jee H:WvpAaWn9%ENGt2-411241 Agemla Al chment 2.dm 1 Iau M,uN a'1/H9B e]a M1 HN SCHEDULE "A" RECEIVED ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Hohnes&Hower GEC 1937 December 1, 1997 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF Mr. David A. Ludwin,P.E. ORANGE COUNTY Director of Engineering County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-70I8 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR REALIGNMENT STUDY OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR,CONTRACT NO.2-41 Dear Mr.Ludwin: Per your letter dated November 18, 1997, we are pleased to present the following fee proposal for professional services to be rendered in accordance with the Scope of Work described in your letter. Our fee is based on the attached Billing Rate Schedule and Fee Estimate table. • Engineering/Consulting Services at our direct labor hourly rates plus 166%overhead ...................................$179,254.00 • Profit Qa 9.65%............................................................................$ 17,298.00 • Travel,repro,telephone,etc. ....................................................$ 525.00 • Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation (Subconsultant :AGRA Earth&Environmental) ............... $ 2-000.00 TOTAL CONTRACT............_..... .»._...._.»»........».»..»»»...$199,077.00 Please note that because of several uncertainties involved, Task 6, Soils/Geotechnical Study has not been included in the fee proposal at this time. After completing the alternatives study,a separate task order may be negotiated for the Soils/Geotechncal Study. Mr. Carl Nelson will be performing the quality control reviews and cooradinate with all the regulatory agencies including assistance for permits preparation. - It has been a pleasure providing our professional services on the Phase I of the SARIS Project and we look forward to working with you on this new contract. Sincerely, C. T. Bathala, Ph.D., P. E. Director, Water Resources Enclosures Post Office Box 6240,Orange.CA 92863.6240 999 Town a Country Road.orange,CA 92868.4786 Fax(714)567-2441 (714)567.2400 F:\uwm\dl9O\bathla\sariskitr4.dm HN Holmes•Narver Realignment Study for Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer(Contract No. 2-41) FEE ESTIMATE. Task Number Task Description No.of Hours Amount I Realignment Study a) Alt.A and B Combination of 364 $28,169 SARI Line b) Alt. C,Two parallel SARI Lines 578 $41,649 c) Alt. D, Complete SARI relocation with tunnels,pumping stations and lateral connections,etc. 518 $41,325 d) Additional Protection of Manholes 132 $11,009 2 Meet&Confer with Reg. Agencies 90 $ 9,028 (6 Meetings+Prepare minutes,etc.) 3. Meetings with SAWPA& County, and Railroad Company 72 $7,591 (6 Meetings+Prep. minutes, etc.) 4. Prepare Prel. Design Report a) 50%Report 144 $12,026 b) 85%Report+Response to comments 100 $ 8,432 c) 100%Report+Reap. to comments 68 $ 6,339 5. Draft Description for EIR 80 $ 7,844 7. Progress Mtgs(4 Mtgs+Minutes) 56 $ 5,842 Subtotal 2202 $179,254 Profit Q 9.65% $ 17,298 Other Direct Costs(Telephone,Repro,Travel,etc.) $ 525 Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation of Altematives (C rh ons+l ant AGR A Earth & Environmental) $ 2.000 TOTAL CONTRACT (W/O Borings & Geotech Study) $199,077 Post Office Box 6240. Orange,CA 92863.6240 999 Town 6 Country Road Orange.CA 9266E-478E Fax(714)567-2441 (714)567-2400 F:\mm\dl90\bathla\saris\ltr4.doe HN Holmes•Narver HOLMES &NARVER, INC. BILLING RATE SCHEDULE for 1997-1998 Protesslonal Category Billing Rate' Project Manager $130.82 Project Engineer $102.30 Structural Engineer $ 98.34 Electrical/Mechanical Engineer $ 94.54 Environmental Specialist $ 99.64 Civil Engineer $ 60.54 CADD Designer $ 60.54 Cost Estimator $ 60.54 Word Processor/Secretary $ 45.54 • Profit Not Included Post Office Box 6240,Orange,CA 92863-6240 999 Town 8 Country Road,Orange,CA 92868-4786 Fax(714)567-2441 (714)567-2400 F:\users\d 190\bathla\suis\Itr4.doc COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA F' February 18, 1998 phone: (714)9522411 Board of Directors mating address: County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County P.O.Box 8127 Fountain valley.CA 10844 Ellis Avenue 92728-e127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 street address: 10544 Boa Aya nue Fountain valleycA Subject: Certification of Nego tiated Fee for the Professional Services 92708-7018 Agreement with Holmes & Narver in Connection with Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protection, Contract No. 2A1 Member In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional Agencies a engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee Cities for the Professional Service Agreement with Holmes & Narver, providing the engineering services in connection with Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment A"eared and Protection, Contract No. 2A1, on an hourly rate basis including labor plus Sears Pan: overhead, plus subconsultants' fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed Lypree $199,077. Fountain Valley Fullerton Har°ngwn Beach Irvine Professional Le Hear. Services La Palma Los Alamitos Agreement Newport Beach Orange Placenta Engineering/Consulting Services at our direct labor s�i Bach hourly rates plus 166% overhead.................................................$ 179,254.00 Steno" Con Ville Perk Profit @ 9.65% .............................................................................$ 17,298.00 Yellin Linda County of Orange Travel, repro, telephone, etc.........................................................$ 525.00 sanitery Districts Geotechnical Subcontractor.. ............... .............$ 2,000.00 Came Maas cAa,dan Grove TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed $ 199,077.00 Midway City Water Districts Irvine Ranch A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954 i i I l Board of Directors District No. 2 Page 2 February 18, 1998 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for services to be performed, and that the said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Orman ck a John ,ollin oint Chair Chair, D' rict No. 2 ist ' t No. 2 Selection Committee Selection Committee rk A. Murphy Barry Deb s Vice Chair, District o 2 District No. 2 Selection Committee Selection Committee David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering DAUAL:gc kYeadWata2Wp.dlatengtENGU401 election Commdtee Lh.Eoc County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEE MEETING OF DISTRICT NO. 7 Thursday, March 5. 1998 at 4:30 p.m. A meeting of the Selection Committee of the County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California was held on March 5, 1998, at 4:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present: Staff Present: Thomas R. Saltarelli David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Christina Shea Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor Andrei loan, Engineer APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR Thomas Saltarelli was appointed as Chair for the Selection Committee Meeting of March 5, 1998. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering presented general aspects of the project, and the Project Manager made a presentation of the project, consultant's familiarity with the project, and explained the scope of work and why the project implementation is necessary to provide sewer service to the area under development. He then presented the project budget and schedule, and requested that Boyle Engineering Corporation be selected to provide engineering services. ACTION ITEM Receive and file Selection Committee Certification and approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract 7-27, in an amount not to exceed $105,519. Minutes of the Selection Committee of County Sanitation District No. 2 Page 2 February 18, 1998 DISCUSSION: The Selection Committee asked routine questions about the project budget and consultant's ability to perform the work. The Section Committee expressed support for the project. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS, OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m. Submitted by: r� ail Cain Selection Committee Secretary :gc w�xm.m��mow�a+ns¢cau ux JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS — DISTRICT 7 Meetlng Mte Tom am. os/zsroe AGENDA REPORT teem Numw t N mw County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 'j/y�Ii FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineerng?' Originator: Andrei loan, Engineer SUBJECT: ARMSTRONG SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-27 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Receive and file selection committee letter. 2) Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Boyle Engineering Corporation, to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-27, for an amount not to exceed $105,519. 3) Increase budget allocation from $5,750,000 to $7,016,000. SUMMARY The Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Helicopter Base located in Tustin is scheduled for closure. The City of Tustin (City) has taken the lead in an effort to redevelop the property, which will be available after the base closure. District 7 and Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) are the agencies responsible for providing sewer service to the new development. IRWD will provide on site sewer services and CSD 7 will provide off site sewer services. A new subtrunk sewer is needed for this purpose between Barranca Parkway and Main Street. The preferred alignment is in Armstrong Avenue. Staff recommends approval of a PSA with Boyle Engineering Corporation, for an amount not to exceed $105,519 to provide the engineering services for the predesign and preparation of construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract 7-27. Due to increased overhead costs and contingency allocation, an additional budget of$1,266,000 is required in addition to the budget previously approved of $5,750,000 (FY 97-98), for a total of$7,016,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No contract expenditures were approved to date. The PSA amount and budget necessary to cover internal costs are presented in the attached "Budget Information Table." CSDOC will use the services of one of the geotechnical consultants currently under contract. The estimated amount of$55,000 for soils engineering services during design is not a part of the PSA and is listed as a separate item in the budget information table. The project will require the acquisition of at least one easement, which in turn incurs legal fees. These expenses, permits fees and miscellaneous material expenses are also listed separately in the "Budget Information Table". M Mq.tllalenpW656 C ALTS1-21 Am,semy$ unxS V.V m�Wno Aaam q,„. e„pzpe Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT -� ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: No.2.Duuo-mt 7 DIP/Increase CaPaony) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The approved budget (FY 1997-98)for the project was $5,750,000. Due to increased overhead costs and contingency allocation of 30% the budget was revised upwards. An additional budget of$1,266,000 is required for a total of $7,016,000. The budget for the design PSA includes provisions for a future addendum to cover the cost of preparing the necessary construction documents related to the abandonment of the McGaw Pump Station if deemed feasible after the completion of the preliminary design report. A budget breakdown is presented in the attached "Budget Information Table". ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Defense Base Realignment and Closure Act of 1991 (BRAC) mandated the closure of military bases throughout the United States. The Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS), Tustin was one of the facilities selected for closure. With the announcement of the MCAS closure, the City of Tustin (City) immediately initiated work on planning for the reuse of the air station property. The City has had prepared a "Community Facilities and Infrastructure Specific Plan/Reuse Plan and Base Disposal for Marine Corps Air Station Tustin, California" (Plan) dated July 1995. The Plan proposes various land uses for MCAS property. The sanitary sewer concept plan provides a preliminary assessment of the backbone facilities required to support the build-out of MCAS Tustin. County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County (CSD No. 7) and the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) are the jurisdictional agencies responsible for providing plan approval and sewer service to the new development. CSD No. 7 and IRWD have recommended abandoning the existing sewer mains and providing on-site sewer service to proposed developments through connections to a new backbone system. In May 1996, Boyle Engineering Corporation (Boyle) prepared a draft study to examine possible alignment alternatives for a new subtrunk sewer designed to service future developments located on MCAS, Tustin. The draft report proposes four (4) alternatives to sewer the area into existing CSDOC facilities. The preferred alternative, 'Plan A", consists of constructing a 27" diameter subtrunk from the intersection of Armstrong Avenue and Barranca Parkway to the Main Street Sewer via Gillette Avenue. The proposed sewer trunk will be named the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, to better define its location. The Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer will be built in addition to local sewers and is not intended to replace any of them. XW dWb,g O0 6 CONTRACTS7.27 bmel,onB SUa,"nn Se 67-27 AmW,019 AR dx R—ed Owa Page 2 The alignment selected for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer is within a short distance from the McGaw Pump Station. The intent of this project is also to explore alternatives to abandon the pump station, thus eliminating the need for upgrades and O&M costs. The purpose of the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is to provide a preliminary design report to establish geometric and hydraulic design parameters for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer and to explore the possibility of abandoning the McGaw Pump Station. Also included in the PSA is the preparation of the construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer. If feasible, the McGaw Pump Station abandonment construction on documents will be covered by a future addendum. Eight(6) engineering firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the required services. The proposals were submitted on February 6, 1998. Staff recommends approval of a PSA with Boyle Engineering Corporation, for an amount not to exceed $105,519 to provide the engineering services for the predesign and preparation of construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract 7-27. A more detailed description of the selection process is presented in the attached Staff Evaluation Report. ALTERNATIVES The Selection Committee may elect to recommend the award of the PSA to one of the other engineering firms that submitted proposals. CECA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Staff evaluation of proposals to provide engineering services 3. Boyle Engineering Corporation Fee Proposal 4. Selection Committee Certification Letter DAL:Al.jee ww ft „WWn Ww CTs 7-27 amsumo sewer e..,.m.n�aa.a: R..t.E. av m Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer Contract No. 7-27 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED .ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET- REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE)%) Design Consultant P5A $ 425,000 $ 425,000 $ 25000 $ 400,000 S - $ 105519 $ 105519 $ 0% CSDOC Stag Design $ 423000 $ 423,000 $ 117000 $ 540,000 8 - $ 540.000 $ 540000 $ 3500 1% Construction Contract $ 4.200.000 $ 4.200.000 $ 769.900 8 41.969 900 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% CSDOC Staff,Inspection and Constr. Management $ 482000 $ 482.000 $ 170000 $ 652.000 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Soils Contract $ 50000 $ 50.000 $ 5500 $ 55.500 $ - $ 55,000 $ 55000 $ 0% Construction Survey $ 50000 $ 50,000 $ 16,250 $ 66,250 $ - $ $ - $ 0% Materials, Permits, Easements, Legal Fees. $ 120,000 1 $ 120,000 $ 212350 $ 332,350 $ - $ 165,850 1 $ 165,850 $ 0% TOTAL $ 5,750,000 1 $ 5,750,000 $ 1,266,000 $ 7,016,000 $ - $ 866,369 $ 866,369 $ 3,500 0% K: p.4raW,%,17-27 Mmabena Subtrunk -27 bW M Mr.lbl.M Armstrona Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-27 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Enaineerina Services. The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • AKM Consulting Engineers • Boyle Engineering Corporation • Holmes & Narver • Daniel Boyle Engineering • DGA Consultants • Hall & Foreman • The Keith Companies • Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates All eight consulting fines submitted proposals on February 6, 1998. The proposals were reviewed and evaluated by staff. Proposals were reviewed and ranked by an in-house review panel on February 19, 1998. The review panel consisted of four members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10, 10 being best, in five categories described below: 1. Protect Approach and Understanding of Scope. Rates the company's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Applicable Project Experience. A comparison of the company's experience as it relates directly to the design of sewer trunk lines. 3. Applicable Staff Qualifications. Comparison of the project team's qualifications and experience as they relate to sewer pump station rehabilitation and design. 4. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants. Addresses the use of in-house resources versus the utilization of subconsultants for specific tasks. 5. Experience with other Projects. Comparison of firm's experience past projects. Important is the Consultants ability to have performed similar work for another agency. X Yp.�6 C ACTW]27 AmW SUW k$•wM14b11 mliulgn Oi R...,.a 1 After reviewing and grading the proposals, the eight consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The first four ranking firms are, in order: 1. AKM Consulting Engineers 183 points 2. Boyle Engineering Corporation 174 points 3. Robert Bein, William Frost &Associates 165 points 4. DGA Consultants 160 points After ranking the proposals, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the first four candidates. Due to the difference in the fee amounts, the review panel considered recommending Boyle Engineering Corporation to be awarded the PSA, pending some clarifications with respect to the scope of work and the man-hour estimate for construction support. Boyle Engineering responded in writing to the staff request. Consequent to some revisions of the man-hour estimate for construction purposes, the proposed fee was increased from $98,106 to $105,519. Staff recommends Boyle Engineering Corporation to be awarded the PSA for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer project for a not to exceed amount of $105,519. w`+v.m .Og acauraXTW-n.... Sw .ass ff eanwa,a: a� 2 ARMSTRONG SUBTRUNK SEWER CSDOC CONTRACT NO. 7.27 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES � P y ay � mar 'Y4 `dc ma m W mu 10 E A x g t E x V' = = F o o W W O W U iy U K � qy Reviewer 1 50.0 46.0 44.0 41.0 40.0 48.0 34.0 46.0 Reviewer 2 41.0 40.0 27.0 40.0 20.0 18.0 24.0 33.0 Reviewer 3 43.0 42.0 42.0 40.0 39.0 40.0 35.0 43.0 Reviewer 4 49.0 46.0 32.0 39.0 33.0 36.0 31.0 43.0 Total Score 250 Points max. 183.0 174.0 145.0 160.0 132.0 142.0 124.0 165.0 Average Score 50 Points max. 45.8 43.5 36.3 40.0 33.0 35.5 31.0 41.3 Workforce Estimate man-hours 3,394 1,152 1,395 1,870 1,528 2,509 859 1,686 Proposed Completion Schedule Jan 22, 99 7 month 6 month Dec 31, Dec 31, 6 month 6 month Jan 17, 99 98 98 Proposed not to exceed Fee " $304,634 $105,519 * $151,995 * * * $158,410 verage Cost per Hour $89.76 $91.60 * $81.28 * * * $93.96 ' The sealed fee proposals of the firms who ranked fifth or lower were not open. Xy NbnOVoM wn4vch]YT].})No .lR--Summery tla Y MCWLE Er76rr7EERN70 C0RP0RR77QF7 1501 Quaff street P.O. Box 3030 714/476-3300 Newport Beach, CA 92658.9020 FAX 714!721- 7142 Mr. David A. Ludwin,PE,Director of Engineering February 26, 1998 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Proposal for Engineering Services for Armstron¢Subtrunk Sewer.Contract No. 7-27 This letter is to clarify and confirm our discussion with you regarding our February 6, 1998 proposal for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-27. The proposal acknowledges that the scope of work for this project is that which is attached to the Request for Proposal as Attachment A. We understand and acknowledge that the upstream connection of this subtrunk sewer to the local collection system will be at the northerly right-of-way of Baminca Parkway. This does not effect the manpower and fee estimate contained in our proposal. If you need additional information or clarification,please call. Boyle Engineering Corporation Victor E. Opincar,PE Philip E. Stone,PE Regional Vice President Project Manager OC-11w-1974041EVARMCLARMOC a F30YLE E/'7G//7EER//7G CORPORRT/O/'7 1501 Quail Street P.Q. Box 3030 714/476-3300 Newport Beach, CA 92658-9020 FAX 714/721 - 7142 David A.Ludwin, PE February 26, 1998 Director of Engineering COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-7018 Revised Fee Proposal for Design Services for Armstro0g �btntBdcSJ•`er.Contract No. 7-21 Below is our revised fee proposal for the project referenced above,based on our meeting February 26, 1998. Our estimate is broken down in accordance with the Scope of Work outlined in your Request for Proposals (RFP) dated January 21, 1998. Our Scope of Work and assumptions regarding this project,which are detailed in the Technical Proposal,forth the basis of our fee estimate. A summary of our fee estimate is as follows: Direct Labor- $ 82,631 Subconsultants Fees,at cost, not to exceed $ 14,100 Direct Expenses*• $ 525 Fixed Profit $ 8.263 Total Contract,not to exceed $105,519 • Based on the attached Manhour Estimate and hourly rates plus overhead at 179.8 percent,not to exceed. "' Printing,drawing reproduction,site visits,and meeting expenses. The hourly rates for the personnel classifications proposed for this Scope of Work include the following: Personnel Category Rate per Hour Personnel Category Rate per Hour Principal Engineer $129.00 Traffic Designer $ 84.00 Senior Engineer $115.00 CADD Operator $ 56.00 Associate Engineer $ 74.00 Word Processor $45.00 We look forward to initiating work on this outstanding project. Thank you again for your consideration. B yl Engineering Corporation Victor E. Opincar, PE Philip Stone, PE Regional Vice President Project Manager Attachment M24l1 CFR c Revised Manhour Estimate Personnel Hours a Task Description w` 'o o C e r � e a y u 3 PROJECT REPORT COORDINATION WITH DISTRICT&AGENCIES Cootdinatiw Ovid,Cities&Agenem 2 12 4 N12 Permit A ficetiom&Assistance 2 4 2 wf Comd'matfon h Utilities 8 tee Th Meetings with District Staff 6 6 Project Report and 35%Submittal 1 2 COORDINATE AND PROCURE SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING 2 PRELIMNARY PLAN AND PROFILE 2 20 % DESIGN CRITERIA 2 4 6 UTILITY&IMPROVEMENT PLAN RESEARCH 12 12 IDENTIFY EASEMENTS 4 4 MCGAW PUNIP STATION ABANDONMENT ANALYSIS 2 10 12 SYSTEM ANALYSIS 2 30 32 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 8 8 PREPARE PROJECT REPORT 4 24 8r279 Subtotal 23 - 146 - % 14CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CONSTRUCTION PLANS PI=&Profile Shcefs (10 Sheen) 2 40 160 Junction Swcmte (2 Sheen) 2 16 8 16 Bedding end Miscellaneous Detaffs (2 Sheets) 16 32 Traffic ConWl Plmr (8 ShWW) 4 20 154 178 DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS 4 24 16 44 PIPELINE DESIGN 1 6 7 JOB WALK AND POTHOLE LOCATIONS 6 2 8 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN DESIGN 16 30 81 127 e802AUI 000C=n BOVLE Revised Manhour Estimate—continued i Personnel Hours y v 6 a as O Q e m Task Description m .o f1 r 0 6 � a � Q p ow L 0 S W PLANS&SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTALS 50%Submittal end Review wiUDistrict 2 2 4 75%Submittal and Review with District 2 2 4 95%Submittal and Review with District 2 2 4 DESIGN CONFERENCES WITH DISTRICT I4 meetin ) 4 8 12 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES 16 16 CONSTRUCTIBILI7Y REVIEW 8 8 REVIEW AND INCORPORATE GEOTECHMCAL RECOMMENDATIONS 4 4 QUALITY CONTROL&PROJECT SCHEDULING 4 8 24 1 36 PRE-BID MEETD4G AND BID SUPPORT 1 4 5 Subtotal 24 52 192 101 364 16 749 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2 2 REVIEW SHOP DRAWINGS 24 4 28 REVIEW LAB REPORTS 8 8 CONSULTATION TO DISTRICT AS REQUESTED 16 24 40 ATTEND MEETINGS AT DISTRICTS RE UEST(12 Meeting) 6 24 30 PREPARE RECORD DRAWINGS 16 16 Subtotal 22 g2 16 4 124 Total 69 52 420 101 476 J4 1,152 sevimta C-PR J9412VLE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA March 5, 1998 ph an [7W)S52 2411 Seeding.eeraaa Board of Directors 127 FWnten Wl*.CA County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County 927268127 10844 Ellis Avenue 54 addroes: Fountain Valley, CA 92708 1p pits Avenue rvunmin Valley.CA 927oa7018 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation in Connection with the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-27 Member Agonvee e In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional Cmea engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for the Professional Service Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, A"eBrea providing the engineering services in connection with the Armstrong Subtrunk Buena Pan Sewer, Contract No. 7-27, on an hourly rate basis including labor plus overhead, Aou"Se;wit" plus subconsultants' fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $105,519. Fullerton Huntington Beech Irvine Le Habre Professional Le Palma Los Maned. Services Newport Beach orange Agreement Placentia Santa t Bach Engineering/ConsultingServices at our direct labor Beal Beach s>anee hourly rates plus 179.8% overhead..............................................$ 82,631.00 r inn Ville Perk Y eLinda Subconsultants.............................................................................$ 14,100.00 Countv of orange Direct Expenses. ..........................................................................$ 525,00 SaWtery Uistritae Corte Mesa Profit @ 10.0%.............................................................................$ 8.263.00 Garden Brove M'd.yGdy TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed $ 105,519.00 water Matti= Irvine Bench A Public Westeweter and Environmental Management Agent,CommSted to Protecting the Environment Since 1954 Board of Directors District No. 7 Page 2 March 5, 1998 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for services to be performed, and that the said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. i .mt O Thomas R.,8 Itarelli Christina Shea, Vice Chair Chair, D' trict No. 7 District No. 7 Select' Committee Selection Committee David A Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering DAUAL:gc H:W p.dlaVngVOBS d COWRACTS%7.27 Armstrong Subtrunk SewertSetodhon CommMe,Ur.doc JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS — DISTRICT 7 Mee.g°af T°" 03/25/98 AGENDA REPORT Item Number I N mber County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering; Originator: Andrei loan, Engineer SUBJECT: ARMSTRONG SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-27 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Receive and file selection committee letter. 2) Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Boyle Engineering Corporation, to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-27, for an amount not to exceed $105,519. 3) Increase budget allocation from $5,750,000 to $7,016,000. SUMMARY The Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Helicopter Base located in Tustin is scheduled for closure. The City of Tustin (City) has taken the lead in an effort to redevelop the property, which will be available after the base closure. District 7 and Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) are the agencies responsible for providing sewer service to the new development. IRWD will provide on site sewer services and CSD 7 will provide off site sewer services. A new subtrunk sewer is needed for this purpose between Barranca Parkway and Main Street. The preferred alignment is in Armstrong Avenue. Staff recommends approval of a PSA with Boyle Engineering Corporation, for an amount not to exceed $105,519 to provide the engineering services for the predesign and preparation of construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract 7-27. Due to increased overhead costs and contingency allocation, an additional budget of$1,266,000 is required in addition to the budget previously approved of $5,750,000 (FY 97-98), for a total of$7,016,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No contract expenditures were approved to date. The PSA amount and budget necessary to cover internal costs are presented in the attached "Budget Information Table." CSDOC will use the services of one of the geotechnical consultants currently under contract. The estimated amount of$55,000 for soils engineering services during design is not a part of the PSA and is listed as a separate item in the budget information table. The project will require the acquisition of at least one easement, which in turn incurs legal fees. These expenses, permits fees and miscellaneous material expenses are also listed separately in the "Budget Information Table". HMrPd Wb QO& &CON ACTS]3]Mm6bc gSVU nk Sw 0e27 Am no AR dw R—. o Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: Nos,Disrnct 7 DIP/nlcrease capacity) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The approved budget (FY 1997-98)for the project was $5,750,000. Due to increased overhead costs and contingency allocation of 30% the budget was revised upwards. An additional budget of$1,266,000 is required for a total of $7,016,000. The budget for the design PSA includes provisions for a future addendum to cover the cost of preparing the necessary construction documents related to the abandonment of the McGaw Pump Station if deemed feasible after the completion of the preliminary design report. A budget breakdown is presented in the attached "Budget Information Table". ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Defense Base Realignment and Closure Act of 1991 (BRAC) mandated the closure of military bases throughout the United States. The Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS), Tustin was one of the facilities selected for closure. With the announcement of the MICAS closure, the City of Tustin (City) immediately initiated work on planning for the reuse of the air station property. The City has had prepared a "Community Facilities and Infrastructure Specific Plan/Reuse Plan and Base Disposal for Marine Corps Air Station Tustin, California" (Plan) dated July 1995. The Plan proposes various land uses for MCAS property. The sanitary sewer concept plan provides a preliminary assessment of the backbone facilities required to support the build-out of MCAS Tustin. County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County (CSD No. 7) and the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) are the jurisdictional agencies responsible for providing plan approval and sewer service to the new development. CSD No. 7 and IRWD have recommended abandoning the existing sewer mains and providing on-site sewer service to proposed developments through connections to a new backbone system. In May 1996, Boyle Engineering Corporation (Boyle) prepared a draft study to examine possible alignment alternatives for a new subtrunk sewer designed to service future developments located on MCAS, Tustin. The draft report proposes four (4) alternatives to sewer the area into existing CSDOC facilities. The preferred alternative, 'Plan A", consists of constructing a 27" diameter sublrunk from the intersection of Armstrong Avenue and Barranca Parkway to the Main Street Sewer via Gillette Avenue. The proposed sewer trunk will be named the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, to better define its location. The Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer will be built in addition to local sewers and is not intended to replace any of them. X rop tl1..,UOeS A CONTRACTW027 Mmm1.11 SU., It Snh1737 bmn,o".AR E- R-. D.. Page 2 ( The alignment selected for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer is within a short distance from the McGaw Pump Station. The intent of this project is also to explore alternatives to abandon the pump station, thus eliminating the need for upgrades and 08M costs. The purpose of the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) is to provide a preliminary design report to establish geometric and hydraulic design parameters for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer and to explore the possibility of abandoning the McGaw Pump Station. Also included in the PSA is the preparation of the construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer. If feasible, the McGaw Pump Station abandonment construction on documents will be covered by a future addendum. Eight (8) engineering firms were invited to submit proposals to perform the required services. The proposals were submitted on February 6, 1998. Staff recommends approval of a PSA with Boyle Engineering Corporation, for an amount not to exceed $105,519 to provide the engineering services for the predesign and preparation of construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract 7-27. A more detailed description of the selection process is presented in the attached Staff Evaluation Report. ALTERNATIVES The Selection Committee may elect to recommend the award of the PSA to one of the other engineering firms that submitted proposals. CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Staff evaluation of proposals to provide engineering services 3. Boyle Engineering Corporation Fee Proposal 4. Selection Committee Certification Letter DAL:AI:jee H+ ften�Ma cmnnncTs ffit.n ammay scowµ s...en7.n Am utez a,„,a, .1. Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer Contract No. 7-27 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED. . ESTIMATED PROJECTlTASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%) Design Consultant(PSA) 5 425.000 $ 425,000 $ (25,000) $ 400,000 $ $ 105,519 $ 105,519 $ 0% CSDOC Staff,Design $ 423.000 $ 423.000 1 $ 117.000 $ 540.000 $ - $ 540.000 $ 540,000 $ 3,500 1 1% Construction Contract $ 4 2D0 000 $ 4,200,000 $ 769,900 $ 4,969,900 $ - S - $ - E 0% CSDOC Staff,Inspection and Constr. Management $ 482000 S 482,000 $ 170000 $ 652,000 S - $ - $ - $ 0% Soils Contract $ 50,000 $ 50 000 $ 5 500 $ 55 500 $ - E 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 0% Construction Survey $ 50000 $ 50000 $ 16.250 $ 66,250 $ - $ - $ - $ 0% Materials,Permits, Easements, Legal Fees. $ 120.000 1 E 120,000 $ 212,350 $ 332,350 $ - $ 165,850 $ 165,850 1 S 0% TOTAL $ 5.750,000 1 $ 5.750.000 $ 1,266,000 $ 7,016.000 $ - $ 866,369 $ 865,369 $ 3,500 0% H:W1.ftWn,W,W-27 Nms ,S.l nkkl-27bd WIMn rWr Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-27 Staff Evaluation of Proposals to Provide Engineering Services. The following interested consulting firms received Requests for Proposals: • AKM Consulting Engineers • Boyle Engineering Corporation • Holmes & Narver • Daniel Boyle Engineering • DGA Consultants • Hall & Foreman • The Keith Companies • Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates All eight consulting firms submitted proposals on February 6, 1998. The proposals were reviewed and evaluated by staff. Proposals were reviewed and ranked by an in-house review panel on February 19, 1998. The review panel consisted of four members. Each proposal was graded from 1 to 10, 10 being best, in five categories described below: 1. Proiect Approach and Understanding of Scope. Rates the company's understanding of the Scope of Work included in the RFP and their approach to the work, methodology, and task breakdown. 2. Applicable Project Experience. A comparison of the company's experience as it relates directly to the design of sewer trunk lines. 3. Applicable Staff Qualifications. Comparison of the project team's qualifications and experience as they relate to sewer pump station rehabilitation and design. 4. Team Organization and Use of Subconsultants. Addresses the use of in-house resources versus the utilization of subconsultants for specific tasks. 5. Experience with other Projects. Comparison of firm's experience past projects. Important is the Consultants ability to have performed similar work for another agency. K m,dsmom VOR.S6 COMRACT40.27 Armstrong SuMrunk Srmns Lh dplOMndor R—.OMM 1 i After reviewing and grading the proposals, the eight consulting firms were ranked according to the score achieved. The first four ranking firms are, in order: 1. AKM Consulting Engineers 183 points 2. Boyle Engineering Corporation 174 points 3. Robert Bein, William Frost &Associates 165 points 4. DGA Consultants 160 points After ranking the proposals, the review panel opened the sealed fee proposals submitted by the first four candidates. Due to the difference in the fee amounts, the review panel considered recommending Boyle Engineering Corporation to be awarded the PSA, pending some clarifications with respect to the scope of work and the man-hour estimate for construction support. Boyle Engineering responded in writing to the staff request. Consequent to some revisions of the man-hour estimate for construction purposes, the proposed fee was increased from $98.106 to $105,519. Staff recommends Boyle Engineering Corporation to be awarded the PSA for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer project for a not to exceed amount of $105,519. w wm.m.�ena�acwmacrn�a�amm,e,gs�n„ws...�t.n ww�m.ea. e«w mwm 2 ARMSTRONG SUBTRUNK SEWER CSDOC CONTRACT NO. 7-27 STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES m IL q Y N c o c o 2 c U' c w 1p E z Y n r E o I1 'c U o w i F 0 o p Q ❑ W U i i U K e d Reviewer 1 50.0 46.0 44.0 41.0 40.0 48.0 34.0 46.0 Reviewer 2 41.0 40.0 27.0 40.0 20.0 18.0 24.0 33.0 Reviewer 3 43.0 42.0 42.0 40.0 39.0 40.0 35.0 43.0 Reviewer 4 49.0 46.0 32.0 39.0 33.0 36.0 31.0 43.0 Total Score 260 Points max. 183.0 174.0 145.0 160.0 132.0 142.0 124.0 165.0 Average Score 50 Points max. 45.8 43.5 36.3 40.0 33.0 35.5 31.0 41.3 Workforce Estimate man-hours 3,394 1,152 1,395 1,870 1,526 2.509 859 1,686 Proposed Completion Schedule Jan 22, 99 7 month 6 month Dec 31, Dec 31, 6 month 6 month Jan 17, 99 98 98 Proposed not to exceed Fee" $304,634 $105,519 " $151,995 ' * * $158,410 Average Cost per Hour $89.76 $91.60 * $81.28 * * $93.96 The sealed fee proposals of the firms who ranked fifth or lower were not open. HM Qla�wntM%7.2T7-T Rw .l Renew Summary Is I ROYLE Br7G7l'7EER/17G CORPORgT/O/7 1501 Quell Street P.O. Box 3030 714/476-3300 Newport Beach, CA 92658.9020 FAX 714/721 -7142 Mr. David A.Ludwin,PE,Director of Engineering February 26, 1998 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Proposal for Engineering Services for Armstrone Subtrunk Sewer.Contract No. 7-27 This letter is to clarify and confirm our discussion with you regarding our February 6, 1998 proposal for the Armstrong Subtrink Sewer,Contract No. 7-27. The proposal acknowledges that the scope of work for this project is that which is attached to the Request for Proposal as Attachment A. We understand and acknowledge that the upstream connection of this subtrunk sewer to the local collection system will be at the northerly right-of-way of Banznca Parkway. This does not effect the manpower and fee estimate contained in our proposal. If you need additional information or clarification,please call. Boyle Engineering Corporation - LL . caw Victor E. Opincar,PE Philip E. Stone,PE Regional Vice President Project Manager OC.B99-197-MEC/ARMCLAR.DOC MOWLE E/7p/7EER//7G CORPORRY/O/7 1501 Ouatt Street P.O. Box 3030 714/476-3300 Newport Beach, CA 9265E-9020 FAX 714 1721 -7142 David A.Ludwin,PE February 26, 1998 Director of Engineering COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-7018 Revised Fee Proposal for Design Services for Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer.Contract No.7-27 Below is our revised fee proposal for the project referenced above,based on our meeting February 26, 1998. Our estimate is broken down in accordance with the Scope of Work outlined in your Request for Proposals (RFP)dated January 21, 1998. Our Scope of Work and assumptions regarding this project,which are detailed in the Technical Proposal,form the basis of our fee estimate. A summary of our fee estimate is as follows: Direct Labor' $ 82,631 Subconsultants Fees,at cost,not to exceed $ 14,100 Direct Expenses" $ 525 Fixed Profit $.J,261 Total Contract,not to exceed $105,519 ' Based on the attached Manhour Estimate and hourly rates plus overhead at 179.8 percent,not to exceed. "Printing,drawing reproduction,site visits,and meeting expenses. The hourly rates for the personnel classifications proposed for this Scope of Work include the following: Personnel Category Rate per Hour Personnel Category Rate per Hour Principal Engineer $129.00 Traffic Designer $ 84.00 Senior Engineer $115.00 CADD Operator $ 56.00 Associate Engineer $74.00 Word Processor $45.00 We look forward to initiating work on this outstanding project. Thank you again for your consideration. BB yl Engineering Corporation Victor E.Opincar,PE Philip Stone,PE Regional Vice President Project Manager Attachment B1er@12C6Mifl :t Revised Manhour Estimate Personnel Hours e .g e _m ° Task Description m a O a PROJECT REPORT COORDINATION WITH DISTRICT&AGENCIES Coordination with Chi=&Agencies 2 12 1 1 4 18 Permit Applications&Assistance 2 4 1 2 8 Coo dinauon with Udlifi s 8 8 Thrte Meetings with District Staff 6 6 12 Project Report and 35%Submtual I 2 3 COORDINATE AND PROCURE SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING 2 2 PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE 2 20 96 P32 . DESIGN CRITERIA 2 /UTILITY&IMPROVEMENT PLAN RESEARCH 12 IDENTIFY EASEMENTS 4 MCGAW PUMP STATION ABANDONMENT ANALYSIS 2 10 SYSTEM ANALYSIS 2 30 PRELH40NARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 8 f279 PREPARE PROJECT REPORT 4 24 8 Subtotal 23 - 1" - % 14CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSCONSTRUCTION PLANS Plan&Profile Sheets (10 Sheets) 2 40 160 Junction Stru wre (2 Sheeu) 2 16 8 16 42 Bedding and Misoellmeom Details (2 Sheets) 16 32 48 Traffic Control Plans (8 Sheeu) 4 20 154 178 DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS 4 24 16 ad PIPELINE DESIGN 1 6 7 OB WALK AND POTHOLE LOCATIONS 6 2 8 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN DESIGN 16 30 81 127 WQm 1 aoova )ROVLE Revised Manhour Estimate--continued Personnel Hours Task Description P _ o PLANS&SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTALS 50%Submital end Review with Dmaict 2 2 4 75%Submittal and Review with District 2 2 4 95%SuhmiOal and Review with District 2 2 4 DESIGN CONFERENCES WITH DISTRICT (4 meetings) 4 8 12 CONSTRUCTION COST'ESTIMATES 16 16 CONSTRUCIIBILTTY REVIEW 8 8 REVIEW AND INCORPORATE GEOTECFWICAL RECOMMENDATIONS 4 4 QUALITY CONTROL&PROJECT SCHEDULING 4 8 24 M28 PRE-BID MEETING AND BID SUPPORT 1 4 Subtotal 24 52 192 101 364 16 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2 REVIEW SHOP DRAWINGS 24 4 REVIEW LAB REPORTS 8 8 CONSULTATION TO DISTRICT AS REQUESTED 16 24 40 ATTEND MEETINGS AT DISTRICTS REQUEST(12 Meeting) 6 24 30 PREPARE RECORD DRAWINGS 16 16 Subtotal 22 82 16 4 124 Total 69 52 420 101 47 334 1,152 4emaV1,ma R f30WE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA March 5, 1998 ph.: r714t 962@411 �ro�.: Board of Directors P.O.see 8127 Fewaem vmey,rA County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County 9272"127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 10844 Sis Avenue F4uM VOW.CA 927MM18 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation in Connection with the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-27 M.en.r In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for the Professional Service Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, ""ate providing the engineering services in connection with the Armstrong Subtrunk seem PaM Sewer, Contract No. 7-27, on an hourly rate basis including labor plus overhead, Fp„ plus subconsultants' fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $105,519. wnerwn Huntlngyon Beeeh Nvina 14 Haara Professional La Palma Lee Alamlms Services B°ed Agreement orange Placenpe �, ea Engineering/Consulting Services at our direct labor sw hourly rates plus 179.8% overhead..............................................$ 82,631.00 rnson WA.Perk Y4rba fault Subconsultants.............................................................................$ 14,100.00 County of Orange Direct Expenses. ........................ .................................................$ 525.00 Scnlrery Dh4Mcte Mete Profit @ 10.0% .............................................................................$ 8,263.00 GeNen bme Mfr ewOty TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed $ 105,519.00 Werar Dlrtrhte 11 Ranch A Public Wesww wr an Enwmnmenwl Management Agency 0emrnbad w Prntecdng Me Enwmnmeiu Since 1954 Board of Directors District No. 7 Page 2 March 5, 1998 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for services to be performed, and that the said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. feZ Thomas R�8 Itarelli Christina Shea, Yce`Chair Chair, D' trict No. 7 District No. 7 Sele Committee Selection Committee i David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering DAUAL:gc H:N, t ngUOBS&CONTRACTS%7-27 Armstrong Subtrunk Sew r�ele Lion Commmee Ucdw AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING MARCH 25, 1998-7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 549542. this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. I In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there ! is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2, Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 03/25/98 Page 2 of 7 6. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 February 25 1998 District 2 February 25 1998 District 3 February 25 1998 District 5 February 25 1998 District 6 February 25 1998 District 7 February 25 1998 District 11 February 19 1998 and February 25 1998 District 13 February 25 1998 District 14 February 25, 1998 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) ALL DISTRICTS 01/07/98 01/21/98 Joint Operating Fund $715,064.43 $776,887.65 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 221,525.68 1,649,499.33 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 10,645.89 District No. 1 0.00 0.00 District No. 2 0.00 43,392.93 District No. 3 203,727.40 32,954.37 District No. 5 0.00 0.00 District No. 6 0.00 0.00 District No. 7 0.00 12,499.17 District No. 11 0.00 0.00 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 0.00 TOTALS $1 140 317 51 $2.525.679.34 03/25/98 Page 3 of 7 CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEM N0. 9) All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All Items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar, The Chair will determine K any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 9. Approve agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD), City of Newport Beach, and Orange County Water District for Operation of Green Acres Project Intertie and Outfall Connection providing for ownership, operation of facility and reimbursement to the Districts from IRWD for pumping IRWD's unused reclaimed water through the Districts' outfall. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 03/25/98 Page 4 of 7 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re March 25, 1998 combined meeting of Steering Committee and Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan. b. DRAFT JOINT STEERING/AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Joint Steering/Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 25, 1998 to be filed. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re March 4, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 4, 1998 to be filed. C. Approve an agreement with Metropolitan Water District of Orange County (MWDOC)for a Multi-agency Water Use Efficiency Program providing for installation of ultra-low flow toilets, shower heads and sink aerators, for an amount not to exceed $78,400 to be matched by MWDOC, with the balance to be funded by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, for a total program cost of$1,568,300.00. d. Approve out-of-country travel by Moyasar Yahya to attend the International Symposium— Health Related Water Microbiology being held in Vancouver, BC, Canada; and approve payment of registration fee and travel expenses for an estimated total amount of$2,317. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re March 5, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held March 5, 1998 to be filed. C. Accept Main Sewage Pump (MSP) No. 3 Drive at Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-33-2 as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving final closeout agreement with Pascal&Ludwig. d. Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P141; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P143; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P248; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2;Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, with Margate Construction, Inc. authorizing an addition of$97,426.00 to the contract, and 26 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$8,792,065.00. 03/25/98 Page 5 of 7 ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 4) 13. e. Approve Addendum No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control System Upgrade at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, for a reduced amount of$312,067, decreasing the total amount of contract not to exceed $2,244,570. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re March 11, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 11, 1998 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of February1998. d. Adopt Resolution No. 98-07, approving Second Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers and Employees providing for compliance with the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (H.R. 3448). e. Authorize staff to enter into a Lease Agreement with the County of Orange for installation of an 800MHz system at Plant No. 2 for a period of twenty (20) years. f. Receive and file FY 1997/98 Joint Operating Legal Fees Update. ALL DISTRICTS 15. Authorize the General Manager to execute Change Order No. 3 to the contract for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid)with Airpol Construction, Inc., providing for the purchase and installation of a new natural gas compressor skid package, for an amount not to exceed $295,000.00, and authorizing 444 calendar days for completion of additional work; and approve an increase in authorized funds of$295,000.00 for Job No. P1-51 (Rebid). DISTRICT NO. 2 16. a. SELECTION COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the Selection Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 18, 1998 to be filed. b. Receive and file Selection Committee certification; approve Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver to prepare an alignment study and report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Realignment and Protection, Contract No. 2-41, in an amount not to exceed $199,077.00, and$55,000.00 expenditure to cover internal costs; approve a budget transfer from Contract No. 2-14-5112 in the amount of$4,603,692.00; and approve an additional budget of$7,260.308.00 for a total project budget of$11,864,000.00. 03/25/98 Page 6 of 7 DISTRICT NO. 7 ' 17. a. SELECTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED(Information only): The Chair will order the Selection Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 5, 1998 to be filed. b. Receive and file Selection Committee certification; approve Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to prepare a preliminary design report and construction documents for the Armstrong Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-27,for an amount not to exceed$105,519.00; and increase the budget allocation from $5,750,000.00 to$7,016,000.00. 18. ALL DISTRICTS CLOSED SESSION; During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chair may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8. 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Boards take final actions on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, 9 necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v. Penn Octane Corporation, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 790409 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). 2. Confer with General Counsel regarding significant exposure to litigation, one potential matter(Government Code Section 54956.9[b][11). 3. Confer with General Counsel regarding significant exposure to litigation, one potential matter(Government Code Section 54956.9[b][1]). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 03/25/98 Page 7 of 7 19, Matters that a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 22. Adjournments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors,the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593.7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 N:\wp.dta\admin\BS W genda\032598.d ralL doc yr �MLlr VKNIH) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on /7Y.�/'y cQ , 1 9?jf�wra�s,�d�ully posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on XA� e�/e , 191d1f- INN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eday of Penny Kyle, ecr ary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California `s BSIFormsIF27A MEETING DATE- 03125198 TM-7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1,2,3,5,6,7.11,13&14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS LM).............................MCGUISAN......... IHOLMBERGI....................ANDERSON......... we PERRY)...........................FERRYMAN no......................... ......... (COONTD........................MURMW................ tMM)...........................SALTAKLU................ (LEYES)...........................BROADWATER.............. IFORSYTHEI.....................SAO......................... . 4STEINER).................. .................... -4 ICOOK)............................COLLINS........................ INOYE10........................DESAY......................... DISTRICT I ITREIIIIMIll........................GENES.......................... ....... ...(UND5RHIUJ.................... (HARMAN)...................... =CGONnj.......................2., DOTSON)......................DONAHUE LNIBERG)....................ANDERSON.................. :PAMEN) - :.-**.......DUNI-AP.............7:711k GLORY)............................ (UNDERH;Z:-::' EMENROOE .......(UEYESI.......................... (NERRYI........................:::RERSYWN.:: (COOK)............_..............COLLINS....................... ANISMER).........................GULUMSON................... (IFFIESCHO........................ (CARROLU.......................JONES.......................... w (PAA KER)........................ IMOAMATERI...............LEYES......... . ... A�� MISNERL......................... IMAULLER).....................WRSHALL..:::::.:: ....... :LUnI............................MCGUIGAN... fie (LUTZ)........ ................MC QUIOAN................ MINER)....................... ...... ...... DALY)............................ZE AVAUKERl......................MINER SIUDFDRD........Ae- I MEL.......... (COONYD................. ............... WEBAY).................... ...................... DISTRICT 3 IEVANS).......................... .................. (EVANSI........................liver.......................... Poo, IMTTS)......4.4..................SALTARELLI.......... (WAUERI........................Nl=DFl :�z jHAMWNDj.........4..........SHEA................. A MINER) ............... (FLOM........................... ' ........ =Fll' .......MINER......... (FORSYTHE).....................BROWN.......M.:...4....... HARMAN).......................SULLIVAN..................... ICOOIU............................COLLINS...................... IMILLIER.................4........SWAN................._._...... (DOTSOM. DONAHUE............... (BATE)............................$) wLvm.................... .e— (PARKM.*..........***.........DUNLAP................. (DALY ...........................ZEMEL................. (BFIOAGWATERI...... STAFF MAULMARSHALL............... "MERSHON................... ✓ HARMANI SULLIVAN....4............... DAHL 4................... TT =nsl.... WLVK........................ HODGES........................ (DALY).......4....................ZEMEL.................m....... "a............................ . LUDWIN......... DISTRICT 6 NICINTYRE...... (NOYES)..........................DEBAY................ WTIEN. OESAY) ......................... ............ ...................... .... .. =Rj........................STEINER.......... STRVIED...... TUWWN..................... DISTRICT 6 "EKTUEY.......4.4............ RPERRYI....................-...FERRYMAN........... m................................ IS�Ri...........444..........MINER-- ....... INOWIR....................... ....... ............ .......... DISTRICT 7 OTHERS =MTTSI...........................SALTAMUJ............ 141061411)4........4.........SHEA..................... WOODRUFF....................... NOYESI.. BAY ANDRUS......................... KHRYI.... ':RRY IUUnL.............................MCDUIGAN......... LEE..................................Ae- COONn)........................MURIW.............. =ERI........................MERIN ....................... LINDSTROM........4........... NNON ............... SHAW. DISTRICT 11 iHAMA :....................... ............... O� HARMAN. .......................SULLIVAN.....................-!OW (STEINER)........................ ......................Ile- DISTRICT 13 IPAWEWI-.- DUNLAP............... tWISNERL.... GULLMON............ (SIMERI MINER...................... MURANY.................... (DALY)............................ZEMEL......................... ..e DISTRICT 14 (HAMMOND).......11,0773)............. IC�TZJ.......... ........:MURIW (SP RI IM[LUDR.. SWAN............_......... HA".dtmkmdmM%SSWMECTOMDIiactoft Poll 01120196 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA - i March 18, 1998 phone: 17141 962-2411 To the Chairman and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors mailing add,..: P.O. Boa B127 Foontalo Valle,,CA Subject: Board Letter 9272BZ127 auto'eddrese: 10e44 Ems Avan is The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional Fountain valley. 1CA 6 information on any of the items, please call me. New Start Time for Joint Boards Meetings At the February Board meeting, a survey was distributed that addressed starting the Member Joint Boards meeting earlier than 7:30 p.m. Most of the responses indicated that an Agencies earlier start time, 6:30 p.m., was acceptable. The Steering Committee would then 0 meet at 5 p.m., prior to the Joint Boards meeting. The effective date of the change Clio. will be discussed at this month's Steering Committee meeting and announced at the Board meeting. Anaheim Brea AMSA National Environmental Achievement Award for Excellence in Public Buena Park cypress Service Fountain Valley gton IBeacn Hvntln I am proud to announce that AMSA, at its annual conference in Washington DC this Irvine May, will present an award to the Sanitation Districts for our efforts toward solving the Le Habra leaking sewer problem in Boise Chica State Beach. As you will recall, we began Le Pelme Lee Alaml.e working on this issue when our beach sampling program detected unexpectedly high No"ort Beach bacterial levels in the surfzone of the State Beach. The award is ours because we Orange went beyond a narrow interpretation of our wastewater treatment responsibilities and Placentia San.Ana looked at our objective of providing public beaches that are safe from bacterial Sao)Beach Contamination. This award is shared equally by a number of people that include our Stanton Boards of Directors, the Engineering Department, the Technical Services Department Can 9 9 P P We Park and the General Services Administration Department. Together, we provided Yorba Linea technical insight, practical experience, and political help that was essential to the County of orange State Parks and Recreation folks to be able to fix their leaking sewer system in the Bolsa Chica area. Sanitary Districts Ocean Discharge Permit Approved by Califomia Regional Water Quality Control canto Mena Board and by Califomia Coastal Commission Garden Grove Midway Giry On March 6 and March 10, respectively, the governing boards of the CRWOCB and water Mirtricts CCC approved our long awaited ocean discharge permit. EPA is in the process of Irvine Panah reviewing some last minute public comments that were submitted on March 5 and 6 to the CRWQCB and EPA. EPA is obligated to review the Comments and then make its final determination, which will become effective 33 days after they've made it. Your staff believes that the public Comments provide no substantive issues of concem that will change EPA's tentative decision to issue the permit. A Peblic We.tewator and Environmental Management Agency Gommiaed.Prolecong the Environment Since 1954 Members of the Boards of Directors Page 2 March 18, 1998 The terms and conditions of the permit will allow us to continue to operate our facilities as we have during the last 15 years—that is, a combination of advanced primary treatment and secondary treatment that has consistently been fully protective of public health and the environment off the Orange County coast. The permit has a unique reopener provision that provides us with additional flexibility to accommodate the Groundwater Replenishment System if it eventually comes on line. Nancy WheaBeys letter to EPA's Alexis Strauss (encased) outlines our understanding of the reopener provision and was sent to EPA as a matter of record. CALFED is not a bank In 1994, federal and stale agencies began meeting on how to best manage the limited water resources within the Bay Delta area of California. Most of California drains through this region that is located east of San Francisco Bay. 23 million people depend to some degree upon the water that flows through this area. Hundreds of native species live in the Bay Delta area. Much of the water used by California agriculture comes from here. The competing demands on this region have caused a tremendous amount of political and economic tension. The competing needs of urban, agricultural and environmental interests cannot be simultaneously met by the Bay Delta as it is presently configured. For this reason, the California Department of Fish Game, California Department of Water Resources, California Environmental Protection Agency, California State Water Resources Control Board, United States EPA, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Bureau of Reclamation, Army Corp of Engineers, United Stales Natural Resources Conservation Service, and the United States National Marine Fisheries Services have worked to develop a plan. They have depended upon the involvement of all interests through a complex system of committees, which met frequently to hash out three alternatives that began from a list of over 100 possible solutions. On March 16, the above listed agencies released the draft version of the Environmental Impact ReportlEnvironmental Impact Statement that describes the three alternatives for managing the Bay Delta region of California. Over the next several months, these three alternatives will receive considerable scrutiny by most entities in California and the federal government that have an interest in the water and environmental conditions of California. I urge the Directors to avail themselves of the various briefing sessions that will be scheduled by a host of water and policy organizations here in Orange County. Most observers agree that the outcome of the CALFED process will set the tone for water use in California and the and southwest for many generations to come. The Water Education Foundation is working with the Public Broadcasting System to produce a television documentary on the CALFED process. Your staff has acquired a rough-cut demonstration tape of the program and will show it at the beginning of the i Members of the Boards of Directors Page 3 March 18, 1998 Board Meeting. We think that this short video will be helpful to you because it frames the various points-of-view that bear on this very important public policy issue which is scheduled to be decided by the and of calendar year 1998. Proposed Orange Coast River Park In the Sunday, March 1, 1998 LA Times, there was an article (copy attached) that described the proposed regional nature park along the east side of the Santa Ana River, across from Plant 2. If this park becomes a reality, staff has indicated that some capital improvements and increased chemical costs will be required to be 'good neighbors.' This regional park's wetlands could be used as a receiver of secondary or tertiary treated water during summer and fall drought periods, as San Diego does. It could also provide a great PR opportunity if we provided a rest area with concrete benches, drinking water, shade and an information board on the Districts. We will keep you advised on the progress of the master plan for this project. Support for OCWD/OCSD GWR System Protect Attached is a copy of a letter to the Editor of the Register, written by Robert Bein on behalf of the Orange County Business Council, in support of the GWR System Project. San Diego's Water Reuse Projects and Their North City Reclamation Plant San Diego's City Council has been holding hearings on the "toilet-to-tap" project. Some of the state representatives from that area have held hearings because of concems expressed by their constituents about the safety of the water. While one of the representatives (Wayne) has concluded that the scientific evidence indicates that the project is probably safe, he has raised the cost issue. The project is expensive. The Reclamation Plant is up and running and producing about 20 mgd; however, no reclaimed water has been delivered to customers. Federal grant conditions require delivery of certain amounts of reclaimed water within a specific time frame, and it doesn't look like they will meet those requirements. This could impact support for our reclamation project. Blake Anderson was asked by Representative Christopher Cox's chief of staff about the project and what is being done about the public participation aspect of it. He was well aware of the backlash to IRWO's Back Bay discharge permit. The Congressional delegation is concemed about the political damage of another public backlash. Collection System Spills durina Recent Rainstorms Attached are copies of two letters to the CA Regional Water Quality Control Board that provide information on spills that occurred on February 24 in the City of Santa Ana and February 25 in unincorporated Orange County. Our collection system staff has always been very responsive to problems throughout the county, whether they are problems with Districts'facilities or those of other agencies or cities. The cooperative efforts between agencies have often averted more serious spills. These Members of the Boards of Directors Page 4 March 18, 1998 two incidents are typical of the calls they receive, though not usually within a day of each other. IRWDIOCSD Operations and Maintenance Issues The staffs of IRWD and the Districts have been meeting on a regular basis in an attempt to iron out some of the concerns expressed by both agencies. These include sludge rebate costs, Silverado and Irvine Community Development Company(ICDC) flaws, flow testing for unmetered sidestream Flows, peak Flow management, and equipment problems because of the poor quality of reclaimed water being sent to OCSD. Progress is being made. If you would like more information, contact Bob Ooten at(714) 962-2411. Update on Bayside Litigation Attached is a copy of General Counsel's memorandum reporting that they received the judge's order awarding the Districts attorneys fees, in the amount of$10,431.50, for having to prove matters that the Bayside Cove Homeowners Association should have admitted in response to requests for admissions. This is in addition to the other costs, interest, and jury verdict amounts. Use of Emergency and Extreme Emergency Outfalis Based on in-depth discussions between the Districts' staff and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, and the Orange County Health Care Agency, emergency wet weather discharges through the 78"outfall will not be disinfected. This is contrary to past written procedures (although the 78"outfall has never been used for emergency wet weather discharges). The new procedures call for the immediate closure of adjacent beaches until testing demonstrates that they are safe for swimming. For non-wet weather discharges from the 78" outfall and for discharges from the Santa Ana River(extreme emergency discharge point), each situation will be evaluated individually with local regulators. A Breather from El Nino The persistent rains that impacted the Districts' biosolids land application sites throughout Riverside, Kem and Kings County have let up a bit and the sites are again becoming available. During the rains, Tule Ranch and Pima Gro were able to manage nearly all of the biosolids the Districts produced without having to exercise the use of the more costly alternative sites. This was possible because of the utilization of sandy soil sites and a permitted storage pad. A minimal amount of onsite storage was needed at Plant No. 1 and no onsite storage at Plant No. 2 was used. The on and offsite contingency biosolids management options that were utilized kept the Districts in compliance with all regulatory requirements and the additional cost was kept at a minimum. a� Members of the Boards of Directors Page 5 March 18, 1998 Published Articles of Interest Also attached are several newspaper articles that have been published in the last month, which you may not have seen. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Dona4/Mcintyre General Manager DFM:jt o mpmr�.i,a.i w,i.p.i.rn,.minm.b�.e.ron,ea.aoo Attachments: Letter dated March 2, 1998 re ocean discharge permit March 1998 Metro Investment Report Los Angeles Time Article dated March 1, 1998 Orange County Business Council Letter to the Editor Letters dated February 26 and March 2, 1998 re Sewage Spills Memorandum dated March 11, 1998 re Bayside litigation Published Articles of Interest ' a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA March 2, 1998 phone: peal 9152z411 Alexis Strauss, Acting Director mMa,q manta:P.O.Boa B127 Water Management Division Fwivain vaner.co US EPA 9272MI27 75 Hawthorne Street meet aeaRaa: San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 1oB44 Ma Arervw Fwmam Vail,rn 92]0&]018 Subject: National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit Member Alexis Strauss: Agencies • The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) appreciates the c✓ea extraordinary effort that your staff put into the draft National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, incorporating Stale requirements and federal requirements pursuant to Section 301(h)of the Clean Water Act, as well as the area eaeau va✓: 301(h) Tentative Decision Document supporting that permit. We expel that the L,uraaa permit will support continued effective management of wastewater for northern Fountain lea.;n Orange County, while protecting both public health and the environment. The draft Beach permit also provides a framework that will encourage development of additional La H,be water resources for the County through reuse of treated wastewater. We believe La Fauna that this is an important component of water resources management for the future of L°a A'an"t M California. . Ma.porr,Beath Orange Fraten✓a Districts' staff has previously provided your staff with a number of minor corrections, Seal Bean clarifications, and edits of the draft permit and accompanying fact sheet. Other than stenuen these minor comments, we have no comments on the draft permit itself. However, VIP.p rk we did want to put in the record our understanding of the substance of EPA's rarba Linea statements in the Tentative Decision Document on environmental impacts from County of Orange discharge. The draft permit limits the annual discharge of suspended solids into the marine Sao", Omura. The to 20,000 metric tons. While the language of the Tentative Decision Loata Meta Document raises concerns that additional solids discharge could cause harm to the Gorden GfO" environment, there is no evidence, and therefore no conclusion, that discharges over Mi0..ar Far 20,000 metric tons will cause environmental harm. This is important because the water Districts draft permit includes a provision that allows the Districts to request an increase in the h r aanth solids limit prior to the completion of the Groundwater Replenishment System. In addition to this general statement about the uncertainly about impacts of solids discharges higher than 20.000 metric tons, there are additional points to be made about the support for conclusions on environmental impacts. The Tentative Decision A ru✓.:w.,:a n.:a.., :a.1 r.n.,a,na,,i,d",„,,Len,Aga y Ga.aa.wX✓In Arw.UM✓a.•ruVrte.uanr!X.:,, trr n r ' Alexis Strauss Page 2 of 2 March 2, 1998 Document uses a model by Word and Meams in evaluating the impacts of solids discharges. Word and Meams themselves noted in 1982 that there were considerable uncertainties and limitations in the applicability of the model on a site specific basis. In addition, significant changes have occurred since 1978 in the character of the solids discharged by the Districts, both as to physical properties of the particles and the level of toxins in the particles. Finally, the improvement in the marine environment since 1978, particularly in the benthic environment, is well documented. All of this suggests that further work is necessary. This work is contemplated by the provision to reopen the permit prior to the completion of the Groundwater Replenishment System. We look forward to working with EPA in defining the scope of work that will support changes to the permit limits. Nand Director of Technical Services NJW:ahh 751OVenn1VUexa Sr ms.dec c: G. Thibeault MARCH 1998 SPECIAL WATER POLICY SUPPLEMENT Metro Investment Report THE INSIDER'S GUIDE TO PUBLIC INVESTMENT IN THE REGION a Water for Southern California. r Critical Policy Decisions PEOPLE/ Must Be Made NEWSBRIEFS 2 By Michael Patrick George, these resources to the Southland.As in car- Managing Director, J.P. Morgan 6 Co. tier times, the Southern California coastal LEGISLATIVE communities face serious choices which UPDATES A reliable supply will impact our water supply and our 3 of water has always economy for decades to come. been critical to the sur- First, the challenges facing our historic ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT vival and growth of conveyance facilities: Southern California. • As a result of agreements with residents SARAH CATZ Fortunately, at critical of the Owens Valley,the source of the L.A. 5 moments, the Aqueduct's water,the City of Los Angeles Southland has ben- must cut transfers to help replenish Mono UNITING THE'818' m,ge cfited from the vision Lake and the lower Owens Valley.Los An- BILL ALLAN ad gales might be ex- 8 foresight of leaders ■ pected to make up for who understood the "The Cif L some of the lost sup- REGIONAL CHARTER nexus between water f✓ of Los ply by claiming more and prosperity, and Angeles must cut of its priority rights to BOB HERTZBERG'S BILL who took the steps water imported by the 10 necessary to assure transfers to help Metropolitan Water the availability of wa- replenish Mono Lake District, particularly SALES TAX WARS - ter at reasonable cost. in future dry years. RICK COLE The massive and the lower OYoens • The State Water projects that cap .ture. Valley. Los Angeles Project typically runs BACK PAGE transport, treat and at only about half-ca- deliver water were might be expected to pacify because of en- on MM, made possible—and vironmental limita- affordable—only [claim] more of its tions on withdrawals 1_\.Count through joint action of priority rights to from the Sacramento/ SvTmmva hnpvmratPm governmental entities San Joaquin River rnwns re9aarae.#2W= from the Los Angeles water imported by Delta in Northern Department of Water& the [MWD] ... California. Currently, �wm ` Power through the Met- - through the complex • ' =�.f ropolitan Water District ■ CALFED process. of Southern California State.-federal and lo- and the federal Bureau of Reclamation.And cal stakeholders are attempting to define *�• Southern California continues to benefit from the Delta's future.including how much wa- water imported through the Los Angeles Aq- ter could be available for transfer to South- ueduct,the State Water Project and the Colo- ern California, and by what mechanisms rado River Aqueduct. transfers could take place. Today,however.we face possible reduc- • Since its completion in 1941, the Colo- IF Margot tions in water available for transport via continued on reverse T METRO INVESTMENT REPORT MARCH 1998 Michael George: Water Wars Are Not an Option continuedfrom front ment is to be shared by urban and ag- I ever-changing water needs. rado River Aqueduct has brought wa- ricultural interests remains a matter of Given the high stakes for Southern ter into the MWD service territory.As sharp controversy. California's future, it behooves each other states' demands on the River Faced with these prospective reduc. of us to stay informed about these de- ltions to current supplies, Southern velopments and to insist that wise, . Californians must plan for the in. I long-range decisions be made, in creased demand that will come as the ! "Faced with these - population and the economy continue ...■ --..-.-,.r,•r to grow. Conservation must be a pan h the high prospective reduc- of accommodating that growth, but "Given . _ tions to current constricted supplies in future drought stakes For-.SontheriT years have the potential to negatively J supplies, Southern impact our lives,our livelihoods and Californians future, it our economic future. - - Californians must Thus, important choices lie ahead. behooves_each Of us And making the right choices today plan for the increased can preserve our ability to count on to stay'in ormed .... demand that will reliable, affordable, high quality wa- and ti insist that ter well into the next century. -•r;,y .,, come as the popula- In the months ahead,Southern Cali- wise, g lon range fornia must make important decisions " tion and the economy about: decisions be made, in continue t0 grow. • How to live within its allocation of ke in with:our Colorado River water,including how g Conservation must the allocation will be shared among best tradition's. The urban and agricultural users; . . . be a part of accom- • How to manage and pay for im- alternative of renew- provements to the Bay-Delta, which modating that will increase at least the reliability— ing Califrs wale/., and perhaps the volume—of water growth, but colt- delivered to the Southland while mak- wars which.divide ing needed improvements in the North •om South stricted supplies in Delta's ecosystem; s'.' I future drought years ' Howtoreformthegovernanceofthe agfromarban,:and Metropolitan Water District so that it :_ have the potential to can continue to be a financially and po- - environmentrafst litically viable force in Southern Cali- �,, �•'^te^^ -k negatively impact fornian water planning m frOm ddelivery, �kSineS5ma11 • How to incentivize public and pri- our lives, our -• from farmer is Sim- vale entities to work together to meet livelihoods and our the needs of the public rather than ply notan alterna- ` simply to protect and defend their his- ,, 1' economic future. " toric empires; tive we can afford." ■ • How to incorporate the forces of �- the free market to promote and reward '-�■ --"- voluntary water transfers to augment grow, however, the U.S. Department Southland supplies; keeping with our best traditions. The of the Interior has ordered California i • How to coordinate the operation and alternative of renewing California's to live within its annual allotment of management of the public's watercon- I water wars which divide North from 4.4 million acre feet—a reduction'' veyance and storage systems, which in- South, ag.from than, and environ- from current levels of perhaps as! clude a complex network of canals,pipe- mentalist from businessmen from much as 800,000 acre feet per year.. lines,reservoirs and water storage basins farmer is simply not an alternative we Even the question of how that allot-' tofacilitatehansferstomeetevolving and can afford. M Alternative 1 Up1o'3{0,;;M-F urtace;Storagepei+;w'; ...r U"�Po 250TA Groundw`ater.Stbra e'! i fill Channel Enlargement _ -• N Operable Flow 15,000cis ,� „�-�_- rControlBarriers Fish Screens - Operable Fish and Pump .� r_M�l _ Control Barrier Station Interde Up to500TAF Up to 2.0 MAF I'Surtace Storage j �(Off-Aqueduct I Up to 500 TAF storage __ �!Groundwater Storage Up'YoY310'h1AFSudace fordge� Alternative 2 �tlp�gF ! _ gGroundwate 1 10,000 cfs Screened Intake Shallow Channel l Isolated from Snodgrass Slough N Setback Levees - �- and Channel - l� Flooded Modifications -- McCormack- ! Williamson Tract \(typical) _ Channel Enlargement "^'mm - ®,�:f y Operable Flow 1 Lr - _ Control Barriers •- �� 4 ..• Operable Fish 15,000 cis i � a -•- Control Barrier Fish Screens Uprosoo.rAF and Pump lntertie SuAace Storage $faflOn Up to zo .. 'Up to 500TAF OH-Aqueduef' Groundwater Storage Storage Alternative 3 ( �'�a tom Grauu'r%dw 'e Storag'e�N 10,000 cis *2,000 cis _ Screened Intake(s) I _ r ' f Open Channel _ • 'r it Isolated Facility l Possible Channel Modifications 5 000 cfs ±2,000 c/s ° ' _ Operable Flow dish Screens and 2 ��_ Control Barriers Pump Station Operable Fish Control Barrier lntertie Up to 500S TAF Up to 2.0 MAF Su f"e Storage Oft-Aqueduct Uo fo 500 TAF Storage Groundwater Storage LOS ANGF,ERTIMPS SIINDAY.NAaCM 1,1598 A Master Plan �g der Ap 1 d dr��t � I r Y,i pen J o T sr for the Area's Natural Assets A Newport Group Hopes to Link Parks l Into a Single Refuge Through 3 Cities IRJOHN CANAkuS RetMe we re auon8er.'" - .S FicM1 eMIY—cxia.Ne Nt<anE mum'—wmb retake lomi ronwl. N EWPOnes. asses BEACH— Met it null be to charge of file re Rae old he future of the group Fisher,w would � ..to oiyer Few"whoa..Wmad out ha. A .omow,m mar Ounce for emm(eapiecesd p antl second Jon,secondco n u uld rtam�m —1—. it oo.u.m Belea lam aaBoa, hmua .nit m.Wto InnlennW into Bran, ...Is _ min. mPxmr,be tom.Intl or the At se.level and..Rous tonmea m pe y uertmmt of Hums. Or raue,ep(raphyabngamethe Re;mm ands Park.,we Or e1w. Santa Are River vanes Or Out, letter I.to-covernee the noes taw lender b allies,Mountain bikers be county bat Ibyl Working co aM aWours.F.P.croak.bust eyenllOdum Grelow.,tho con. layers l✓overaWre.rabduacurry mt, Orange Cyal River PVY. Imm loosed WBa. Trained eyes e v ,thady wins" on apt the social" I. ry mah m ,h 'IT Ln[hl ea rodte art and It marsh". lit ram'""Pies Ira could m. How imagine lM.uburban m. $20-11bnpmers,10,your an. Nar ewport Beach.costs Near and w,o,eseromet From private federal Huntington Beach. TM1n is wMl andada somer ire lovers dromin8 re Ord, The INa b Wired,B erne ay. 'coast RI .. wv Park sinks pen. Why through nature�a tin an. R maker arue b de.e. a G,t l Stretch of the county maater pNn mtwam III these -Youd or emus and all know Paris, where pares nod:' New. .top,rage be 'Being bigger puts You In pest Beach Dry ether bellna.' MavBrr Kevinold Just lne BIIIBeh better pOSII100 J.Murphy raid Orange Coast Ali Tom Committee moortom Dean Ralremann,left, How... mL and mr,ke,It much Basler dRbe value of aM Jean Watt try to Slay dry"Ile lacing WdibM 0roded by min. - a, with tldn8 II all b - PmWalabtar. to get funding. . goner la You cots. Baehr We're sort oflolning plan bow o will brikeo- .. w pky',t hands,saying, 'I Cb al. Mrs. Park Place B...n-emrd "Together,we're sly Cnundl. OUWMtaW brmewm ue oily ma Ju fMb udennB GnkinR (mupm behind SArOnger.11I mayrtH.Antl InNvidual prig Nbone waskins the pre=bawl. M.,it "I fvdY I•r8eurtitb[r MOZe _ --You ill aHINMx'Yp aeSpxl Ne boa COY1 River Park: erfitla"xrMa.4Weaavl M. Yr'ar IM1lnk vblle f kln. Ibr t ,gulag Waing. Pen pass rlllxaxet�..,m e tlb,I tan diwn .11 lilt Me Ops. Mai on w ands i T adaY 1M yrk without evYlrre.—baGearyMblG i wmylq wNt N..."ion you Reason Beach and flu dinglm E3 as K Beach men will conmbme TS.tW Tile O ,whim mclwa for. toward.hasmrmy..it,. it he mr Nawn Beam City Court. county will be asked to give - wemn poJean wall am other fo.m, ar o ."..WWm,parchuy to The Crime am city eourxe M t .wgoalless Wks with moat strictest to tlalde MOnm> /,• edA aW Priwaaiaodto .nebrrloamribu.l. thtea 1.WO tart per tint wlmr TOO Rcawua or Toylm woW. rough Of and m m n"'n'". ow Mom".whim plan W bW1e [ only..am Prl,ab land. hour"on u eW-at,,oil geld In 1 oIt weub Include miann8 natural wmld",=am.aWmMgbt gem such w Pau,O, Refracted cmdtln tleM.a, Ism b Irm W,k In On. Mm.the munYi Orange Cot River Park w Taber,Motor.Preserve and Mod. we going u b our him Fast Facts f Lntl.In Hunumlon birth. mpwal Planning Proses:',.and. c Oe9(mHn6 lam lam tamer one ItbpssiblelNt®mini Ne land reAMut 1.e00 acres mmler plan could Increm tin wouitl MlrnmprawdmdAAm—ol as Iantl ou'dand l... cNrcd ol(erung feelantlmb wmprow" Cities and NecaunlY veuld �'wa g...b prmrve uwuve.—. no p,l.Wit uY.10 to M Continue to mana8I Ibe Dropenlea plant vegdatian Ind Improve Yvan BallhenMwmTp.way- Mmlollhelantl woultl be realmrm .III "An Greenspan,....)a Adnmletl bmWrtprevery man tlpamlveoupuat j "Lett lust putit .,,the,bit In oat Hswprl:' mM L%Re "Conventional uIGA W0 .1 I p way. There,a la,or vamladWen Ovalle, he I,vd whit tl Bu. .r Planned outberelorprants. Nowardrad. prior Avenue. " Ibeees noopen re PlvaWly..'nm lmd wouldmdonMM `Bern,bigger fort,you in a much apace from Nrwpn Boulevard W belles position and makes ll much be Santa Ana River.There u� mbr to 8,, rgdin,. .uYi. Wets luuly_ no place for children AsWrl of pining h..6, m.Yes play xATrasxa.pxrbA,wM.pow., . a FED 19 '99 d 59PM OC6C F0.K7144760443 PDst-r Fax Note 7671 1Rom► T. rM , ORANGE COUNTY 2 Puk FUR suire loo , I 714.476.9240 'y cDm.v: fn $USL1 SCOUNCR phDn M476.2242 • Ia Fw'rr nFq * 79 H-7117 Far _ .7 Far itPw,.l�y q,a,dtt.{ Put4MA a CORI �'TW19� To: The Orange County Register- 1 page by fax t�ffYli DU®Y! H.x aortic aD•alcrbrcrr.. �.mue.asa Editor. rvra6W n�ye Recent news accounts have highlighted activities in Sacramento Intended to help ¢ao,mnrwmxalr California provide for an adequate water supply for Southern California that is also rma a� a��raarr environmentally enhancing the San Francisco Bay Delta. These are critical activities which must be pursued if California is to continue to plan responsibly for Nu�� its economic future. Additionally, two local agencies, the Orange County Water District and the Orange asnavc� County Sanitation Districts, have been engaged in water supply activities which are just as important to Orange County's future. Together, these agencies have �1dH proposed the Groundwater Replenishment System, a program which,when Dares:*�,m implemented, will provide a new, reliable source of high-quality drinking water to DDDaW MDuman. Orange Countians. mu.. DBY w�T m The Groundwater Replenishment System proposes to take highly-treated wastewater now discharged into the ocean and, using microfiltretion, reverse osmosis, and disinfection, purify it to exceed drinking water standards. This DIYVrDt g process will add 100,000 acre-feet of new water to our drinking water supply. Enough to serve 200,000 families in north and central Orange county for an entire �°re`nrDne°1�`�m year. This project will ease Orange County's growing dependence upon the declining ar,� aaT, supply of imported water from northern California and the Colorado River, and will help to ensure the continued economic health and vitality of our county, Because the Orange County Business Council believes the project makes good business, environmental, and water-supply sense for Orange County, our Board of Directors recently voted to unanimously endorse it Thank you for your efforts to bring important information to your readers about efforts to preserve and enhance this finite resource 50 precious to our daily lives and our economic vitality. Sincerely, I �'U Robert Bein Chair, Water Resources Education Committee Orange County Business Council iNUIND OaANOr CODNTT'r rCONOaIC FDTY•f a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 3 ROUTE TO D.MCINTYRE ANDERSON D.LUDWIN February 26, 1998 :,J.WNEATLEY „sy.,. .. G. ?TREED 4.Pt41 MEQ411 R�.UO i Ei•t w•wr Gerard Thibeault, Executive Officer e California Regional Water Quality Control Board 'G i70DGES RM rft��..� Santa Ana Region No. 8 X:.' W72"127 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 . >: :iaadem: Riverside, CA92501-3339 scNFiLes :F ®v Avenue -- ':Fxmm:n vw*,ra 92705-7019 SUBJECT: February 24, 1998, Sewage Spill The purpose of this letter is to provide information regarding the sewage that MamLar spilled from three city of Santa Ana manholes located on Warner Avenue A2andm between Towner and Flower Street in the city of Santa Ana. The sewage spill anea began at about 8:30 A.M. on February 24, 1998, and lasted for two and half- hours. The overflow was from the city of Santa Ana 15-inch line and was caused by a surcharge condition in the Districts' 24-inch line due to heavy erda aeana Park rains inflowing to the local area sewer system. The size of the spill was F ,,,,wm Ww approximately 2,150 gallons. The sewage entered a County Flood Control Fun channel that is west of Bristol Street. The heavy rainfall conditions did not Mmtln9mn eea°n allow the responding staff to contain the sewer overflows. The Districts are 18 Ha . filling this report of a city-related problem due to the fad that the regional U P°Nne ma Abmrt system trunk was surcharged. Na n B°em .ante vlaaerma The Districts had assistance from the city of Fountain Valley staff and their $ ° valor combo truck to remove liquids from the city of Santa Ana line in an sea.l,g seeeam 4 ty yT4mm� attempt to alleviate the high flow volume. Between the Districts' combo truck vl�P� and the Fountain Valley combo, a total of 19 loads (approximately 1500 mroe Ur a gal/load) of wastewater and rainwater were removed from the problem line. ONMV o O enga The trucks discharged into a nearby Districts' trunkline that was not at surcharge. The combo trucks removal, transport, and disposal operation Ynkenr a.wtta continued until approximately 3:00 P.M. Other actions taken included cPa a aeaa removing diversion boards from a Districts' trunkline downstream in order to Gordan asya divert some of the high flows to another District trunkline. The efforts by ml� y a[y Districts' staff and the valuable assistance we received from Fountain Valley "w� oia = and Santa Ana staff resulted in averting a much larger spill situation. 4 ne sen°n The Districts' staff and a CCTV contractor are televising some of the city of Santa Ana lines looking for possible sources of inflow and infiltration. A Public Was[ .wr and Ennronmeml Menagemen[Agency L°mm,¢ee[o Pro[ectmg[ne Ennronmen[Since 1954 Gerard Thibeault, Executive Officer Page 2 February 26, 1996 This information will also be provided to the Districts' Planning and Engineering staff as wet weather operational problems are being evaluated as part of the Districts' Strategic Plan. Attached please find a copy of the incident report, field observation map, and spill volume calculation. If you should have any questions regarding the spill please contact me at (714) 593-7400. Nancy J. Wh tley Director of Technical Services NJW:JC:rm H:%.p.dtav:us50\�njweADW50DS410-.do- Enclosures c: Monica Mazur, OCHCA Nick Arhontes ECM File County Sanitation Districts of Orange County CONTROL CENTER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROBLEM REPORT Fill Out Completely (Reverse Side for Spill Information) Original: Control Center c: N. Amontes, T. Blanda Electrical/Instrumentation Problem c: G. Jones SERVICE REQUEST WZ 35 Oy� - 24 �^ DATE OF OCCURRENCE:Z O TIME OF OCCURRENCE: �e1 M DATE OF NOTIFICATION: L �Z TIME OF NOTIFICATIONQ$ 4= `R M Person R,e,j�o�rting Problem: op T NAME: lle-1...\ym Ik •PHONE: D l) AGENCY: C'\" C5(Z- S9t'e�A �M/A ADDRESS: 2 E F— I-LJF_r= J 1SuJI`4&_( ,. FLOtJ Location of Problem (Thomas Guide Page and Coordinates): V b.S "\ CITY: SSA NEAREST CROSS STREET:'�'1�•� DISTRICT NO: ` - TRUNK: '� STATION: PROBLEM: ODOR ❑ PUMP STATION❑ SEWAGE SPILOV OTHER ❑ 'Fill Out Reverse Side Spill Section IS PROBLEM IN DISTRICT SERVICE AREA: YES NO ❑ NOTE: If spill is involved, tell reporting individual that CSDOC staff will clean it up or notify responsible agency. CONTROL CENTER PUMP STATION STATUS: NORMAL PROBLEM ❑ NON-SPILL: RESPONDING DEPARTMENT NO. / - DETAILED DESCRIPTION: RZES I&E W%iL- Cprv.C-0 �N e3%/ Caw a 5_A 'gA0tz$C. f� TowNF1t j wArWEr—) Or- SD PERSONNEL_ ASSIsj I CIN of SAN'rA ANA /Al RELIF_,/*JJj SQILL ro WRRNEYZ AVE- fSETtu&G.Pj 'rbWWF_tZ t ACTION TAKEN (detailed descd tion �-V including responding personnel and equipment): FLo ry 6� ��t� • . � �7 _ CREWS DISPATCHfiI� Ta RELIEVE HIGH lJOLW4M OF wATE2 Fam TRUIJIC LINES oN bts-tEtcf N6. 1 . NE R.ITV of Fowr.,TAtl \/ALLEy AssrsrF� ©CSD STAFF wt-rw 4 VI4Q'TD✓L T'2ucK REPORT RECEIVED BY:��V�GL` Qf6<kAWj DATE'•Z' r - OPS. SUPERVISOR (Full Name): _4.0/ MCiur_ DATE: Z-2 4 -QFfIME: I 30 \4eadWata2\wp.dta\omWORMS\OPS.PI\CC collection System Problem Reoort-Sell Reoon doc Pa„.,, •,n-+mv SPILL REPORT TYPE OF SPILL: SEWAGE CHEMICAL (I.W.) ❑ OTHER ❑ ESTIMATED SPILL VOLUME' (GALLONS): SMALL (<1,000) n MEDIUM (1,000-10,000K LARGE (>10,000) ❑ IDENTIFY RECEIVING WATER OR LOCATION OF STORM DRAIN INLET" C04wT1l_FteaD CONT/LDIL Ch4AWwl%L W"Or OF 92tsr1iL-. IS THERE A POTENTIAL HEALTH HAZARD FROM THE SPILL? YES ❑ NO ❑ IFYES, Explain SPILL WAS OILL.Trb WtTsl LARGE VDLLAmr� OF RA;ws=A" CAUSE OF SPILL (i.e., grease, roots, line break): "AV W VDLLIME OF RRIAJ SIZE OF LINE (inches): TMEW 15 It 'Must be a verifiable estimation. "Creek, river, flood control channel, ocean, etc. NOTIFICATION LIST: SPILL (in this order)* TIME DATE INITIALS RESPONDING DEPARTMENT: NO. 34$$ Sf 0840 ®PM 2-214 - �P, COLLECTION FACILITIES MANAGER: 0- PRNfiLTGS L0� 0 DO (OPM 2-24 TkN COLLECTION FACILITIES SUPERVISOR:TOK BLAMOts Q OD A M 2-2'1 —1 1� DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE: ❑ AM/PM CHIEFOPERATOR: SoHw ;:t1Ulp5 ,44 0900 M 2-21/ TM ECM DIVISION: .TAMES CaWMJ 042.0 6PM 2-24 Ttin HEALTH DEPARTMENT: pr 1& l 6PM .?-?4, REGIONAL BOARD: Ey j- lPM .;2-,?H OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES: rhr r jVdt LABORATORY: ❑ AM/PM OTHERS: ❑ AM/PM I�I � I OPS. SUPERVISOR COMPLETING RPT: (Full Name): L.�t IL(gy`, DATE: 2-2.4 -Q$ FOLLOW UP: SPILL STOPPED ra I (00 HIZS PUL Taw. QLPeIaA , mcme0 - TRue-KS hIi;CxA&AF-L1 INFO SUWFLOL1t1Z IZUMI� �a FAIt2VIEW 37' FOLLOWUPSY: 0y)l K40.4'±�— S30 DATE:2-2-4_Q3 (NAME) (DEPT) Spill Report Routing: _ Robert J. Ooten Ed Hodges P1 Chief Operator Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Div. (Hand Carry) 1VeadWa1a2k.P.dtalomT0RMSI0PS.Pi=collection System Problem Reeort-SPill Recort doc Revised tMIN V N FOSEVAOO N m � T a n • y z P"K 4 I T TO*UNEtI 1 is 41 � R�NA I i o � I i FLOWER e Z m o • Im '� (^ vaoouN Iw �T� can m r '1't �VlJ1V 1 1 JH1VI I H I ILJIN 1113 1 1'CIL, 1 J PAGE I OF I OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 14O '�2A SP �L 'w QTY OE SA.trB H/I a z[7 DATE er a c — 4., SUBJECT DATE DESCRIPTION JowYJ�b G�.ev.�Aeceu CHECKED BY L DATE Z!1 TircLArE-P ro I�Z-Q 23 SY� c.Auseg A soa c-"A-CE qw C.SD l ro A $Auc V Q of Ca- y Ov SdnL-CA k,4A PZ'Al L3� Gl�-( �!„L{, CsVEf�S R•1(uti- AGE V9•IT 1�eLES . I�M.Oc�ewl eF Zyz W4r / SAs; ow 4K Assk,w..JED 8 :3Q4M Satir A*w A F% i5tiA eu 1�'.U'c Ads, . GA�.c.+��kT[o.1 �s 4A,.:4 6N OatG«C- 4.Ezcdop : �3� eowns , CSC 1/t°S� Hem �s � 1�� wA�n t�aw� CPC-IL SrAEF� i e� Za� w c = c k c� ipo, Yti 9S uo.E a= .'185 �A`� = . 185�I�z�1= l$S�.o�ZJt= '18S�ool1C�= . 00�4FifNo Q= .6(o c .oOl4 Z(\3Z -L)�%� Q = .00047- 5.3'j _ . oozl cFslu G :. QT = .00z.I GFS/,� Jc 4o�f3 x 3 cWEAS K 1 GPI t coVSM1. CFS Q.T= 14.14 GpL' 'vti A 2.!/L W(L. C-yUr lc � Cpsit l_ G-Sr V olu w.ti�-lS l50 Ww L; 7,f 'K 14.1 GAS = V ZL GAw-o,4s MW SAY ZlSO GALLas ovEnF� ew Lr ro ur/ sr,: w, S) i., As coa-A"'j mj- cc Ir �soc Pos StfS D�+-E t'b SYo A& i7`i.- y sou 4occF ACoi* Co_R_6. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA March2, 1998 ft?44lesz-2411 GerardThibeault, ExecutiveOfficer �� „a1h-=Y1 C- 724-SM127 i California Regional Water Quality Control Board N• t2e t 6-t � Santa Ana Region No. 8Vaft�' 3737 Main Street, Sude 500 Riverside, CA 92501-3339 . 22 :.±try•- M.TU•,arMAN I T.t i,em: J me A m SUBJECT: *February 25, 1998 Sewage Spill IICA -;i FILES Is The purpose of this letter is to provide information regarding the sewage that spilled from a manhole located near Crawford Canyon Road and Newport Boulevard in unincorporated Orange County. The spill was due to a blockage that was caused by vandals, in the Aamde. - Districts' manhole on an 8-inch line. The size of the spill was approximately 9,000 _.... gallons. The spill occurred in an easement area and the spill was contained in a ponded area and recovered to the extent practical and some unknown volume also soaked into the ground. '?Ahehehn e ee" eaen;aan: ' The County of Orange notified the Districts of a spill at 4:20 P.M. on February 25, 1998. The agency reporting the spill had received information from a resident that said while walking his dog he had noticed that for the past three days foam and a small amount of '�eeam water was coming out of the manhole. The Districts' staff responded immediately to the '"•'"'"^""8 location and found the manhole was full of rocks, various debris, and a lawnmower. The material in the manhole was removed and the blockage was relieved at 6:00 P.M. The aa , Districts' staff used a Vector combo truck to recover the spillage until 11:00 P.M. on 'seem February 25, 199B. The following day the field crew returned to the spill site and . ry 9 Y P completed the cleanup activities. ' " nm In an effort to prevent this type of occurrence In the future, the manholes in this off road easement area will have metal straps installed to lock down the covers and discourage --n Wlle'w . lbw.o tampering. 'p1r"ly°r-Q`°"B8 Attached please find a copy of the incident report, photographs, and field observation map ,- with a spill volume estimate. If you should have any questions regarding the spill please �'"I`° 18t1{CB contact me at (714) 593-7400. -my r corns We. - ':eG Men-Grove —M;w�ey crr _- �19�� .YJerar.0iatNeta '" -_" tcv J.Wh alley �IMrre Heneh -_:-- Director of Technical Services Ly: ' 7• - �:t.. NJW/JC:mcm H:twP.orAlrsu5s9IcowAtl.naEAoM9o57Lrn.00c "9 Enclosures _• c: Monica Mazur, OCHCA ECM File i:`+•n'-, - A PubAc Wastameer and Environmental Management Agemy C°mml¢ed t.Pr°teceng the Environment Since 1954 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County CONTROL CENTER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROBLEM REPORT Fill Out Completely (Reverse Side for Spill Information) Original: Control Center c: N. Arhontes, T. Blanda ElectricaNnstrumentation Problem c: G. Jones` SERVICE REQUEST DATE OF OCCURRENCE: O —+d OCCURRENCE: •�' AM/PM DATE OF NOTIFICATION: Z. -Z,rj- q n TIME OF NOTIFICATION: 2M Af Person Reporting �.Problem; W, O1 2,, _ q a $$ NAME: 9 lam` , �v��: PHONE • a'-4Z , AGENCYC(r� Z ADDRESS: Sx ',t j LocationJof� b- of__Proble�m (Thomas Guide Page and Coordinates): C'TY:v � 5 . NEAREST CR SS ST}R�EE.f}� ` ' N L STRICT NO: TRUNK: �uY SiATIONfr v ,'�OSLEM: ODOR ❑ PUMP STATION ❑ SEWAGE SPILL* 0 (�OT�HER 'Fill Out Reverse Side Spill Section 1"'rah \ �•� - - IS PROBLEM IN DISTRICT SERVICE AREA: YESX NO O " '•� N V� - NOTE: If spill is involved, tell reporting individual that CSDOC staff will clean it up or cwa responsible agency. C� CONTROL CENTER PUMP STATION STATUS: NORMAL PROBLEM 0 NCNSPILL: RESPONDING DEPARTMENT NO. DE-AILED DESCRIPTION: VVNKW \ 4 Sm C O Co �w ACTION TAKEN (detailed description including responding personnel and equipment): QCar1{, i.l 1L\V\raLn5� �. +Mfl-lPL (LiPVP _ '-LOPnC•P kln5 Tyhlv�tl {t, 1ne ��ll � G� frP (LS� c�P�ni�� 7n C�a'V�1GL�Cn.Jn,��oi.)2 i� REPORT RECEIVED DATE?'24� TIME: `�3- CPS. SUPERVISOR (Full Name): ,/ i1.. DATE: 2-Z-5—geTIME: /7/s SPILL REPORT TYPE OF SPILL SEWAG CHEMICAL (I.W.) ❑ OTHER D ESTIMATED SPILL VOLUME' GALLONS): SMALL (<1,000) ❑ MEDIUM (1,000-10,0001) LARGE (>10,000) ❑ IDENTIFY RECEIVING WATER OR LOCATION OF STORM DRAIN INLET/" Ol.gyp 1 s. o 0 CoNMN Qk , C�rN �L - C<:lI�\ ""i C-LL IS THERE A POTENTIAL HEALTH HAZARD FROM THE SPILL? YES ❑ N6� yIF YES, Explain �/' AUSE OF SPILL (i. grease roots, line break): SIZE OF LINE (inches): L "Jf-- a C, 4z *Must be a verifiable estimation. 'Creek, river, flood control channel, ocean, etc. NOTIFICATION LIST: SPILL (in this order)' O�V . 4,Lp TIME DATE INITIALS RESPONDING DEPARTMENT: NOW& T' VJ , P �� . COLLECTION FACILITIES MANAGE.R:N\Q,r Qr AM _ COLLECTION FACILITIES SUPERVISOf� M t�. �( \ � A P Z-LS DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE: ❑ PDX A PM AA � CHIEFOPERATOR:- � ��`� ^ 7 .ECM DIVA SION: I aAt HEALTH DEPARTMENT: &tj aoc_ N� 1 f73D AM/! 2-ZS REGIONAL BOARD: OES ❑ 1.90e AM/r�ppr 2-26- OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES: OoAlneDL /J0. 98- /0 20 6'f12/S SEAJSEIJ ❑ AM PM 2-2S 71'L^ LABORATORY: ❑ AM/PM QTf Rs:�v L �1Gv`I VIGSAMQR �5 CgYY� l _�0 RPT: (Full 1. �" OR�SUPEF 0.�. F • ORfP NG RPT: (Full Name): /,�rpu� DATE: 2-25-�/5r FOLLOW UP: c6, '\&AliT-\P-J , �JC/dG�c W'1'cg QC"frA� tZ EL\E+.//G� C, %-r- �� %"tit lldR a cl m Aw-r �` ^ FOLLOW UP BY: 2 , �� / DATE: (NAME) (DEPT) Spill Report Routing: Robert J. Ooten - - Ed Hodges P1 Chief Operator Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Div. (Hand Cary) �� X _mod ��d�� — • . Vol AVV •A • •m L eu� 64 q54 r D//UG P-"J I 6E f U A �• ti b� W� 1 ° �- �°� �5 P7l n �� a• �L'pd":fiv9aCh ��N /L • p�vQ� 3y5 ��. �o �7�,s.-�.�vdws svrv+ No�,p„��1o'� y' rn�do p„v� d� Nvg ,� qti r +w �we� .,ow n — sc� s, Q3dNoa ` SVM xCny e uRpr',rt" ONO, VJSVM3aSgM �o awdwu4%9 3;)tL5 � '. - . .i` �,� vy - , r fr' �i.-: 'a 4. .jam e: �� _� �� _ �� r, �/ i .��:� _ �1 �` i, ' �V!. � � .,""r. r�� r �� .. (� ti. � r ri ♦1.' Yr..t .. �, Orange County Sanitation Districts \ Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Tsection Page # Date Subject Orange County Register y LAGUNA BEACH The Trabuco Canyon Water Dis- trict on Tuesday reported that a power failure at a pump station dumped igD,0111)gal. lons of sewage into Aliso Creek—3111),OUD gallons more than MondaT's esti. males determined. Reaches from Dumnnd Street to 10th Street are expected to re. main closed until at least Friday. 14)4M-Saar 1 Ula)asa-]335/ Caution Is Tap Water Findings Urged Over The authors contaminant a study linking tr halomethanes, a hethorsooften found in up water,to early miscarriages urge caution in interpreting the findings. f THE STUDY Water Scare y ■Examined 5,144 pregnant women between 1989 and 1991 fn Z three Calterper day with least 5micrrveormore glasses M m tr tap water per day with h least 75 micrograms per liter of fG m Ucrease risk miscarriage studyir first an 0 ■ Health:Authors of increased risk of murarruge in their first trimester. Study on link to THE REACTION N TJ miscarriages say •Amid anoutpourmgof concern.researchers said.some public officials and other non-scientists went beyond what the nonscientists have offered scientists involved know,including stressing that pregnant questionable alternatives, womanN their first trimester should boil tap water for aminute. CD including the boilingof RESEARCHERS URGE CAUTION in ■The results of the study need to be replicated and should be 0 tap water. viewed as preliminary. Is Other options,such as using a carbon filter,may be better ~ By=E MARQUIS than boiling water. to to TIMM STAFF WRITER w ,^ I.OS ANGEI.ES—Authors of a � ryt ? Z Y�i study that linked drinking sigmfi- Freeman insisted that he could covered for several hours in the cant amounts of tap.water in early not withhold potentially important refrigers or and drinking bottled miscarriages this week urged cau- health information from the public, water. 0 0 lion in interpreting the findings, even if it was incomplete. "We feel very strongly there is a tp saying boiling water carries Its need to let the public know that the m to own risks and is not necessarily"a bough the study was not pub- evidence is building, but there is a ,0 great choice." fished will Wednesday in the period of time where their guess is K Rustin Waller and Shama H. scientific journal Epidemiology, m good As ours as to what to do," Swam, the two top state health water associations and others said Raymond Neutra,chief of the O investigators in the large-scale learned about the basic findings by division of environmental and oc. — m 1D study of Raiser patients pubhcired late January. The Times obtained cupational disease control for the - 0 last week, said the outpouring of copies of memos outlining the wa- slate health department. concern and some of the recom- ter associations' concerns about it Waller and Swann said they had n mendations from nonscientlas in and reported the findings last intended to give water utilities and response to the study went beyond week. the media briefings on the study what the study's researchers The study found that women before its publication this week, -a know. who drink five or more glasses of but word leaked out before then. 0 In particular, Swam cited the tap water per day containing high They said they and the California 0 recommendation of Los Angeles levels of common chlorine by- Department of Health Services to Department of Water and Power Products—drihalomethanes—were were taken by surprise by flee- Q General Manager S. David Free. at greater risk of miscarriage in man's remarks, which they said V) man that pregnant women in their their first trimmer than women were based on secondhand infor- ,( V) first trimester boil up water for a with Ims exposure. mation. r-1. minute and place it in the refrig- The increased risk was noted at Freeman, who was out of town C stator. Compared to other options, concentrations of 75 micrograms Wednesday and could not be such u using a well-maintained per liter or higher. That was an reached, has said that the public M carbon inter,boiling is"not a great importarn finding because doctors deserved to know as soon as pos- U) V) choice,"Swam said urge pregnant women todrink lots sable about potential risks in drink. C Boiling water',is:inconvenient of water, yet the federal upper ing water and what to do about and may cause contaminants to be limit for trihalomethanes is If1U them. He noted that although the m inhaled or become concentrated, micrograms per filer (although it study was not conducted in I.os .rt. they said will be lowered to 80 in Novem- Angeles—it was based on women "We had quite a bit of discussion ber). served by the Fontana,Santa Clara about whether we should include State officials,after much inter- and Walnut Meek Kaiser facili- [boiling) at all"as an option, said nal discussion, decided against re- ties—the city's water often con- Waller, the lead author, speaking leasing any recommendations wins more than 75 micrograms per for the first time in detail about the based on the study,only the second liter of trihalomethanes. findings. to look at the link between irihalo- But the researchers—who had The report of the findings, and methanes and miscarriage and the agreed with Nejournal Epidemtol- the response to it. is what some first.N find a potential problem ogy, as is common, not to discuss health officials consider a rase Instead, state researchers de. their findings until they were pub- study in the dilemma of respon- cided to release a list of"options;' lished—said boiling water creates sibly communicating risk to the which they said was as far as they risks of its own. public. State officials said they felt they could go based on one They said this week that boiling knew that they had potentially' study that had not been replicated. water is cumbersome and can important findings but were un. The other options, besides using make water taste bad. A return. me, and still are, about the full water filters and boiling water, mendation to boil often leads pw implications. were allowing water N stand un- pie to drink less water.they said Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings =�rameper Section Page # Date Subject Timesing SPILLS Rai the TradWater an Canyon, Irvine Ranch Water and Santa Margarita water districts was blamed for the problem, said Bruce Boner, era- pr�/.}� Coormved from Bl huts Canyon district's general Sewage Spills Beach Honeybourne, manager for the manager. county's water-quality programs. Boner said an investigation re- "There is a backup generator but it vested that a computer controlling Closures Blamed on failed to kick on when the station eight pumps and a telephone dialer wentduwn." at the station had failed when "a e N County workers immediately number of power spikes;' hit the El�j� �Ttf1 (�} m� posted warning signs at Allan pump station._ 1\M`0 lJl�onm Beach, near the mouth of Atiso "It's a programmable logic con- Creek, more than 12 miles down- troller," Boner said. "that was stream from the pump station supposed to control the pumps and By DAVID REYES when the spill occurred. - also controls a dialer that dials out TIMES srnev wants A second sewage mishap was m notify us when there's a prob- LAGUNA BEACH—El Nino-related reported on Wednesday, lem.It failed" storms that have caused havoc to coastal About 113M gallons of treated Boner said he reported the sew- property are now responsible for a 480,000- sewage sludge spilled into Sulfur age spill m county health and gallon sewage spW, the largest in Orange Creek, a tributary of Alien Creek water agencies and also the San County in three years. that has forced about 5.30 a.m.Tuesday,said Mike Diego Regional Water Quality dmure of a 2-mile stretch of Aliso Beach. ��•general manager for South Control Board The water district Authorities said Wednesday the Trwurw Coast Water District The spill was has fixed the problem,he said Y blamed on water-saturated creek On an average day,about g50,000 Canyon Water District reported early embankments that gave way,mp- gallons of raw sewage is pumped Monday that an electrical pump station turing the sewage pipeline. through the station and lifted to a that sends sewage to a treatment facility So far this week, four beaches regional treatment plant on Ortega had failed The district at first said 180.0D0 along the county a 42-mile coast- Highway,he said gallons of untreated sewage had Bowed fine have been ordered closed und] into Alis r Creek, but that figure was Inver health officials can test creek and u oneybourne said that although increased ocean waters for contamination Hague warn the public not m '"They changed the amount later when levels,Honeybourne said. swim in water tainted with bacte- they realized that the pump station was out All four closures were caused by ria and pathogens, some surfers for at least three hours;' said Larry sewage spills from pipe ruptures, continued base Aliso Beach Please see 9PILIS,BS embankments giving way, our rain Mark Cousineau,president of the overwhelming smrm and sewer San Clemente-based Surfrider systems. Foundation, cautioned both swim- •Salt Creek County Beach was men and surfers to stay out of the closed ae a result of a 500-gallon ocean until testing has been com- spiB at a pump station by Moulton pleted. Niguel Water District. "There's always a concern when e Dana Point Harbor breakwater you have sewage in the ocean and and half a mile of Doherty State despite signs,people will still go in Beach area closed because of a the water,"Cousineau said.'"Typi- pipeline break caused by a land- cally,these people are risking seri- slide in San Juan Capistrano.It was ous time, throat and ear mice- first reported on Monday, and tioW. again on Wednesday when a sec- The lest big sewage spill was on and pipeline break was discovered, Jar, 14. 1995,also an Et Nino year. said Honeybourne.More than 3ADO when an estimated 1.2 million gal- gaLLom of treated sewage entered Ions of sewage spilled when a San Ivan Creek. 200-foot section of pipe owned by e On Saturday,Capistrano Beach the Irvine Ranch Water District Water District reported a 4,50D- was washed away by heavy rain. Son new sewage spill at Coot For more information regarding Highway and Paliaadm Drive in Orange County beach closures or San Juan Capistrano. A haH-rtdle m report a sewage spW, call the stretch of Capistrano Beach county Health Care Agency at County Park has been closed (714)667-3752. •A1i80 Beach u Gm an from David Reyes can he coached at Diamond Street to ]0I3r Street in (714)248.2150.His e-mall address Is Laguna Beach. deeld.reyes®latlmes.cem. At the Tnbuco Canyon Water District, where the large sewage split occurred,a pump station serv- Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings / Name of PIaper Section Page # Date Subject Ind2(�7 I ll �OFlS+c ( Covrlr>tiissldv� . _ of the lettf p o — the week Its time for all environmentalists In 'I Huntington Beach to slap personal . attacks and bickering over tactics and _ A goodik, come together to fight for what we all seek:preservation of natural open space for Coastal . drestoratign 9fo4rdegra wet- lands,lands, Including M south wetlands south of Beach Bo4leyard as well as the Bolsa mmi ssion' Chin. Co As a coastal commissioner—and with . our support—Shirley will be In a poll leader of one of our cltys 8101sa tlon to greatly strengthen the protection of our city'$coastal resources.Its an Chin advocacy groups Was A recently quoted In the opportunitythat must not be squandered Independent as song that Shirley, by organizational In-fighting. Dettloff's appointment to the California' GORDON SNInfl Coastal Commlislon is a?slap in the face Huntington Beach to the environmental mmm4nhy. Well, I am ope member of that dam- munitywhose face doesn't feel slappeck i The appointment of Shirley Dettloff to on the contrary,I am delighted with the Coastal Commission Is the best thing Shirley's appolnbrjent.For morethari 20 to happen to the commission since Its years, I have witnessed,firsthand,Shliley'1 founding. Shl commitment to the environment in our Shirley Is a true environmentalist and cit<None>y,Inducing,yes,the preserve- not only a valuable asset to our commu- tlon and restoradgp of the Rolsl Chin.' nity of Huntington Beach;she is truly one What are my credentials to speak as of the best friends the Bolsa Chita wet- an environ isentalo?My involyement lands has had Indudes:Past cAalr,Slen a dub Angeles Without her dedication,hard work Chapter coastal committee.Recipient. would leadership,the Bolsa China wetlands Sierra dub Conservation Service Award. would 6e anon-Issue,long since devel- oped over.Now due to Shirley,we can Former member,HWAIngton Sea ds look forward to a restored coastal wet- Environmental Board.Director and pas 'I lands In our community. chair,Huntington Beads Wetlands " JEAN tAUGHUN Conservancy the group dedicated to the' _ Huntington(leach wetlands downcoast from the Bolsa Chia. .. . . . .. . .. .. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date (�5ubject IYl {P 1I�QAI I�/2I o��i 1 cc,15 V 11 /Y/hl �L Hearing could be turning point for Bolsa CWca ■Judge to Wile if commission,said attorneys for developers and environmental- Coastal Commission the Bo1va Chico Land Trust.But F.Y.I. ists.Now that the majority of the whether that new hearing could - wetlands are owned by the state restricted Public input affect the commission's original ♦The court hearing is set for and will be restored some env,- approval of the 1,235-home 1:30 p.m.Friday in San Diego mamentahsts are focusing their during meeting. development n still unclear. Superior Court,Dept 40,221) attention on saving the mesa—a What we behove the court W.Broadway,San Diego.- 230-acre piece of open space B Jen'dergta land,?rid should do is send this back again approved for KoB's housing Y 9 went to the Coastal Commission for a development.The lend Trust complete and tau public hearing, continues to support the Coastal and other groups are trying to BOLSA CFBCA—Friday may where all the roues cm be raised Commission and it dectsum. raise enough money to purchase be a crucial day for the future of and where they take public com. 'I hope the judge can help end the mesa=it have it dedicated the mesa,as lawyers on both mentr and actually incorporate 30 years of disrnssion and bring as open space. Md.of the battle will duke it out those into the land use plan,' closure W this process,'she said. Cook said the Land Thirst is San Diego Superior Court. said Debbie Cook,one of the Duan said it may be interest- hopes to get another Coastal Judge Judith Su MCor tour will three attorneys representing the big to see how McConnell will Commission hearing so members determine whether nin land Tkmt. react Friday,considering the can voice their concems about public parch Judge McConnell ordered Land Thirst has already filed an the development plans,particv- ipation during the last Coastal Fridays court hearing in appeal on the other portion of lady the buffer zones between Commission hearing an Koll Beal December,at the same time she her December ruling. the housing tracts and the web Estate Groups mesa develop- denied the Land Trust's request The Bolsa Chico,the largest lands they would overlook. Mont plan was adequate.K she to have the entire plan sent back remaining coastal wetlands south •B you put 1,200 homes cent finds that public comments were to the commission a third time. of San Franasro,has for the past to fragile wetlands,you damage restricted,the entire plan may Lucy Dom,Koll senior vice 30 years been the renter of a that whole fringe of the wet- have to be heard again by the president_said the developer contentious bathe between lands,' ahR said. There's one word that describes Surf City 's success — people hat makes a city great?Is it t""-"ems "' "-"'-" - When you stand proud on the the beautiful buildings of a LOCAL POLITICS• '. Fourth of July as you watch the city:Bke Pans,the parks,the " ----- __.�._._-. �-._ parade going up Main Street.remem. environment,successhil buonesses? her that a group of citizens worked Yes,but more important are the peo- k nearly a year to continue this tradition. pie our city has.Their insight,dedica. " 'w i. Senior citizens depend on the tion and hard work have made Shirley efforts of others to provide meals, Huntington Beach the city it is today. activities,health services,transports. This same vision is with us today dettlofF tion,and there is a citizen involved in This vision will take us into the future every one of those activities. It is the people who had the tore- Citizens make dreams a reality.1 sight to know that parks,libraries,art know that any project our citizens renters and protection of the minion. start•they will finish.Why? anent were important.7bese things did Because we see the results of thew not just happen,they happened because the government thought they efforts everywhere we look.This city because our dozens felt they were were important—ato ens of could not function without thew deter. important and worked hard to make Huntington Beach thought they were urination,hard work and the visions what were dreams become realities. important and spent 25 years of their they bring to their city. Many of the places and institutions we Wes to make sure that one of the last They are our heart—pumping take for granted are here today wetlands in California will be here for energy,dedication,creativity and their because of dedicated citizens. future generations. personal hard work into an effort to When you drive by Central Park, Now other citizens are leading the improve the city we all call home. remember that citizens thought it was fight to expand this environmentally 1,as mayor of Huntington Beach, important enough to spend several sensitive area. salute these dozens,many of whom years of their lives fighting to make Our youth sports program would work with no recognition but volun. sure this park was built.Citizens saw not have been expanded had it not I.because of a belief that one per- the need for the best library system in been for citizens who believe that the son cam make a i itferecce,and a Orange County and worked to give in hope of this cation is its children and thousand can change the world the gift of one of the best in the nation. are doing something to make sure we .SKUUY oe'ntmiF b the rria r of Our wetlands weren't saved have facilities to serve our youth. trunongton Bean. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times I Emergency Sm Declared as ite Feb. S.more than ri m inches of ra ha cove fallen in the county, damaging flood control channels and roads and causing landslides and ❑ooding. The emergency Gets declaration signed by Boats of a county to County begin state-funded Jime-f Suva allows the county m begin await-funded repairs immediately with e a wafting for hid The atom th at arrived Thursday after- to Rain noon was expected tob ins an inch of ram and through this morning. "Orangerange County cen expect ram to begin on Saturday and move through into Sunday ■ Storms: Action by the right with some sbowem Monday; then will het partly cloudy skies,"said John Sherwin.a pit rs'chairman p meteorologist with WeatherDaw, which for State funding to providesforecasw for The Times. O.C.qualifyThe -sun may shine through partly help pay for more than cloudy skies on Tuesday and Wednesday se, $$million ID well,he said needed repairs. Temperatures will remain moderate, m the low 60s today but rising a few degrees MDAVeIDas REM 2s ar wartsa ■gFFXIXO RELIEF Two county cities declare emergencies Svy i A, an a the wake of recent after NlsmonN'e heavy rams 82 heavy storms. an emergency deowrahon for orange County was.signed Thursday to on Saturday, Sherwin said. Sunday will help qualify for state funding to Pay for bring back lower temperatures,and it will more than s5 million in repairs. stay chilly Monday as the clouds disperse. The declaration came just anothat he said.Tuesday and Wednesday will bring powerful storm was moving into the temperatures in the upper SDs,he aid. county endue m drop at least 2 The normal high temperature for this inches of rain through Sunday night time of year is 69 degrees, according to F'loodmg Thursday right inSanta Alta WeatherData. forced city crews N done Segerstrom At San Onotre State Beach in northern Avenue between Bristol and Flower San Diego County,officials announced they sucew,and the northbound woos Of Bristol Pleasoe see RAIN,Rd at Alton Avenue Santa Ana Police LL Jose m� .continue et least through 7 am.today,,he said. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings FF Name of Paper I Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times /1 J I 'fin RAIN: Emergency Declaration Signed Continued from BI owner Marc Peskin.He added that Restaurant owner June Neptune will close the park's bluff-top city crews had installed concrete spent most of Tbursday lugging campgrounds on Monday for at barricades behind the hotel park- restaurant equipment and furni- least 30 days to make an ewer- mg lot to protect the property. ture from the premises to Tivoli gency atom drain repair. Storm "Hey, we're offering a free mud Two, her second restaurant across damage is threatening to wipe out a bath with every room," Peskin Laguna Canyon Road, Fire Chief large section of roadway. quipped "I've learned that you've Bill Edmundson said. People with reservations will be got to keep your sense of humor Tines,staff writers Marelda bodmn relocated to other campgrounds, here, or you'll go crazy. We've and Geoff Boucher conmbuted to this parka SupL Jack Roggenbuck said reopened after a tremendous report. In addition to malting road re- amount of work was completed by pairs, county work crews were a bunch of good people helping us Shoring up eroded beaches Tbum- out." t day. In Laguna Beach,owners of the "We're fortifying sidewalks and damaged Tivoli Terrace restaurant drainage structures co they remain and wedding chapel were not as All Brands-All Models lntaet. They have become under- fortunate. A hillside gave way Fasf ium-Amundli Low Rdtas mined and exposed from the big Tuesday behind the landmark res- surf," said Larry Paul, county taurant at the city', art festival Intel Penlium'SYslems coastal facilities drmtor. grounds,destroying the chapel and fat hani aal Iasieess Crews were also removing buckling the ceilings and walls in heavy debris that washed ashore, several rooms. including trees and timbers, to prevent them from floating back out and becoming navigational hazards. Barricades have been installed at Aliso Beach as a safety precaution where sidewalks and beaches have been undermined by erosion, Paul said Lifeguard Richard Chew said. "Our beaches have just been taking a beating. We've got rocks, palm fronds, trash, you time IL The mean's been throwing up every- thing on our beaches." In Dana Point, tons of mud slid down a LWside Feb. 7 and into a parking garage at the Holiday Inn byres, on Coast Highway. The hotel was forced to close after the mud flow buried 19 vehicles and knocked out telephone service and f electricity. i The hotel will reopen today,said Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject 711 Orange County Register /rzTr . � ( NirJ I DON'T COUNT ON DRYING OUT SOON WEATHER: Although El Nino is shrinking, strong and frequent storms may continue for months. By PAT BRENNAN near Christmas;' said 7PL re- The Orange County Register search oceanographer Bill Pat- t looks like Orange Coun- Tsrt. I The bad news is, this doesn't ty's on-again, off-again storms will be off again, at mean the weather will change. There is still plenty of warm El least for a couple of days. Skies should clear this af- Nino water interacting n's the sur- termum after a night of rain,and atmosphere o the ocean's four Saturday may be dear and sea- face. That probably means four ny. The rain won't return until more months of heavier-than- usual rain and larger-than-usual late Sunday or Monday. It's ex- storms, pected to be heavy at times,with showers lasting through Tues- El Ninoo said. has shifted weather as day. patterns worldwide, so that But El Nino may well continue Southern California is getting churning out storms for as long rainfall more typical of central Mexico this time of year, and as four more months. e good news, say scientists South and Central America are Th at C good Jet Propulsion Lab- receiving rainfall more typical of Southeast Asia, he said. oratory in Pasadena, is that El ..The El Nino event we've seen Nino is thinning.The vast warm- this past year is larger than any- water pool in the eastern Pacific, thing we've seen in the recent which was SW feet thick in No- vember, is now 2DD to 250 feet scientific record, which is about thick, according to the latest So years;' Patzert said. measurements from the TOPER/ To view TOPE)(/Poseidon images of El Poseidon satellite. Nino,check JPL's Web site at httpJ/ "El Nino was at its maximum www.lpl.nasa.govlelnino Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings ==NePaper o Page Date SubjectLOSs Times On the Coastal Tightrope Dettloff s new duties in midst of beach issues On one side are developers wanting to also agrees that without money to buy property build houses or hotels on the ocean. On or other lands to exchange, that's not realistic. the other is the guarantee, written into The state was able to come up with the Boise law a quarter-century ago, of public access to Chica funds because the ports of Los Angeles California's beaches. In the middle will be and Long Beach contributed $79 million in Shirley Dettloff,mayor of Huntington Beach. exchange for being allowed to expand.But it is This month the Senate Rules Committee difficult to find funds in such large amounts. appointed Dettloff to the California Coastal The Coastal Commission has proved consis- Commission seat reserved for a public official tently popular with the public since its estab- from Los Angeles or Orange counties. She will liniment in 1976,four years after passage of the take up the position as one of 12 commissioners Coastal Initiative that paved the way for the in Much. state agency. Her job, and that of her fellow commission- Among the proposals the commission will be ers, is difficult. Pressures for development are considering before long is one to transform a increasing in California along with part of Crystal Cove State Park the economy. But the public's sup- .T ,,,, north of Laguna Beach into a port for the commission, especially luxury beachfront resort with its protections of people's ability to nightly room rates up to $400. get to the beach,is constant. f Mother resort has been proposed Dettloff was an early member of . for the former Treasure Island Amigos de Bolas Chica, which did trailer park in Laguna Beach, with valuable work in fighting an overly �° hotel, homes, restaurant and park. large development proposed-for the Farther north, the Hellman Ranch Bolsa Chica wetlands in Hunting- property in Seal Beach could be the ton Beach. - `.. site of scores of homes and a golf As a City Council member in the course if the commission approves. coastal city since 1995, she has ShirleyDettloff Central and Northern California monitored the process in which the also have development proposals developer, Koll Real Estate Group, the commission must address. Last has won approvals from various regulatory month, it rejected plans for an ocean-side golf bodies, including the Coastal Commission, for resort and other facilities new San Simeon and the Bolas Chica housing project. On Friday, a Hearst Castle. Superior Court judge ruled that the commission With the economy improved, pressures for must have another hearing on the matter. development have increased. Builders find it Various developers originally proposed easier to get money from banks and are more building 6,000 homes on the lowland wetlands confident that they can sell what they can and on the mesa above. But after a decade of build. The "move-up market" of home buyers review, the number of homes approved is brisk, as people start trading up to bigger, dropped to I= One favorable development more ezpemive homes.Residences on the coast was the state's willingness to buy 880 acres of will always be in demand, with their sweeping wetlands and make them a wildlife use rather views of the ocean. than housing. The Coastal Commission has to be aware of Some members of environmental groups those pressures and examine proposed develop- opposed the appointment of Dettloff to the ments carefully.Its job is to protect the coastal commission; others have supported her. And environment. It also has to beware bars to she herself has spoken frankly of the difficulty public access to the ocean. of balancing "private property ownership ver- On city commissions and then as a council sus what's best for the entire state and what's member, Dettloff has spent years scrutinizing best for the coast" proposals for development. She will need that Dettloff agrees that the ideal would be no experience to walk the tightrope and keep her development of Bolas Chica or other coastal pledge to honor the act that created the property, leaving open space as it is. But she commission on which she will sit. P, 7-e r' THURSDAY,FEB.12,1998 StIIC,�/■ tu"It's not necessarily a rosy pic- • m," Hashimoto said Wednes- ' day, when the EPA released the study results. "But things are definitely improving." The study,which cost about SS waters million and is the first to involve such comprehensive sampling, � showed that 91 percent of the coastal shelf supports bottom- dwelling creatures found in natu- ral, uncontaminated ecosys- tems. And the concentrations of DDT and PCBs in the livers of ;ENVIRONMENT: De- bottom-dwelling flatfish were 9S ppite IOW-level contami- percent lower than they were 20 natifin the marine'eco- years ago. r "Concentrations of beery met- system is healthy, the als,DDT and PCBs are dropping EPA says. phenomenally,"said marine sci. ence Professor Dennis Kelly of By PAT BRENNAN Orange Coast College.The Orange County Register More work remains, Hashi- moto said.The study looked onlyy Fish and other marine life are at sediments,fish and water off- thriving off the Southern Califor- shore; she hopes that EPA will me coast, and ocean water is begin a study of near-shore wa. largely unpolluted,despite wide- ters and harbors next year, spread low-level contamination -which are likely to be far.more from heavy metals and pesti- contaminated. cides,according to a study by the p U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The study,based on samples of sediments, water and fish taken in 1994,showed that 99 percent of the coastal waters from Point Conception to the Mexican bor- der meet state and federal tar- gets for clarity and oxygen con- tent—oxygen being essential to the health of marine ecosystems. The legacy of urban runoff and widespread use of the pesticide DDT before it was banned in 1970s lingers, said Janet Hashi- moto,chief of monitoring and as- sessment in the EPA's water di- vision in San Francisco. Ninety percent of the coastal shelf is contaminated, especially near the Palos Verdes Peninsula in Los Angeles County,where large amounts of DDT were dumped when the pesticide was manufac- tured in the area. But those levels are low,and do not appear to be seriously affect- ing fish and other marine life, which showed little sign of dis- ease. MARCH IN CORO VIM "WWI ,4—IeAik ff Is-:n. WN, V4 13� en, nat tec. 7 fec cu th� pla ON THE TRAIL In the footsteps of the Chumash h ■ Things have mine full circle on ,< a plot of land beneath Bonev Mountain in Ventura County. MV Once the home of the Chu. mash and Gw home o t pc* pies, no ples, it's now homee too the -i 9amiwa Native American Indian a4 Culture Center and Natural Area e which includes a visime center µ[' and a replicated ap, a Chumash _ dwelling made ofwillow and rule. Several «ails radiate from the } culture center.The Boney Moun. rain Trail often great scenic%an- 1 �. cry in just a few hours. Walk down the paved service mad for'/e mile and you'll see the sign for the Bonet'Mountain Trail on the left.You'll begin hiking be- neath the namesake stony out. wPPwks a favorite among soar- ing hawks.The ua8 descends into a canyon lined with oaks and sycamores. You'll cross a stream Q With the Twist Rain Hat. you can laugh in the many omen before you teach the waterfall. On the way back, pick i face of rain, scoff at hail, and. well, turn a blind up the Sarwiwa Loop Trail,which eye to fashion. The hat quickly folds into a small reNrm you to the admit center. pouch that Stows easily in a handbag or pack— -Where. OR Formic, Rd. in New. less awkward than foolingaround with an um- bury Park,about 4 miles from the Wendy Dr. exit off U.S. 101 in brella when rain threatens.Though it does come Ventura County. in a wide wray of colors, wearing it will ensure Wben:Open year-round. in more ways than one—that you'll look better 'Distance:3 miles round trip. •D/Qiculty. Moderate. after you've taken it off. $8.98, plus shipping, 'Conran:(818)597.9192.e:a 201. (800)882-1898. —Mark lamana f�,� AVS a1Pg Birdsand birders— xe.eu rs. o t. nave been winging it to Poueoae Ia. the Prado martin since 8: nrir its recent construction. i[rl s srm apt in. plants and ingested by soil microbes. The districts wetland water treat- � t natily By the time the water works its way ment plant wasn't meant to be a com. yin; s, '"etc oao .n, _n. through the II/:-mile series of ponds, muniry park, so there are no picnic u- smldr..I.eu. LYINIt f<p�r aANCNO -d- enough nitrates have been removed tiles or other amenides here. But if you :•. stsuu vlsruAk se naturally to exceed Environmental Pro- want to spend a tranquil afternoon rn�umm..A.k s^T`alwa o m.mrnrb m, RMFA tettion Agency standards. [oaring the roads between ponds, spy- iillrrr srm.. Krom on The white-faced ibis doesn't seem to ing on gadwalls and redheads.ibis,and ��yl°Ovt"'I m re ca that its new home is also a costal least burettes.you're perfecdv welcome. e a y�a- '��-r.. m. fective water treatment plant.Md nei. •Contact. To smange a guided walking y ,b- ther do the birders.who discovered this tour,call(714)378.3323, `s N 1 v GG 0 A place almost as quickly as the birds did. —Sbaron Coboon MARCH rsaa 23 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Fo s Angeles Times jrl� �y.� c( 3��11`1� cjl II1�i> Perspective The Mother of Los Ninos: Great Flood of '38 By JOHN CANALIS The Great Flood of 1938 remains the on concrete blacks,like they did in those SPECIAL TO THE TIMES worst weather-related disaster In . days,so the waterpushed through." Orange County history. Runoff In the 'Automobiles were stacked Macias remembers setting her 14- Sixly years ago this month a massive San Bernardino Mountains and days of year- old eyes on the aftermath Rood swept Orange County with a rain caused the Santa Ana River to up like 90 much kindling "Automobiles were slacked like so destructive force that makes El Nfdo overflow, wood.Animals, you just lost much kindling wood," she said. "Ani- lwk muypequedo. Fifty-eight people died, 2,000 were them. They were swept mats, you just lost them. They were Many slept as the Santa Ana River left homeless and$12 million In damage y Pt On swept on with everything else." breached Its banks and overflowed Into was reported. The county, which had a with everything else.' Hope endured and good deeds were northern and western Orange County, population of only a bit more than — common. A woman in labor was taken Thundering water toppled bridges, 100,000, reported millions of dollars in LORRAINE MACIAS by boat to a hospital, where she deliv- chewed up streets and uprooted railroad damage from Fullerton to Huntington ered. tracks.Flooding overtook homes,barns, Reach. Lecfl Slavack,85,of Anaheim remem- cars, fields and the people and animals Not all heard the police warning his ben that his future wife was visiting historian Jim Sleeper,72,of Tustin said. who occupied them. signals around midnight March 3, and his look a month m find all in the from what is now Westminster but "Dikescollapsed at 2;30 a.m. and some who did could not escape. couldn't return home. They married a within a half-hour the river had risen 5 Farm workers stationed on low, flat bodies. . . . People were stranded on .feet and was racingthrough the city," land were hit the worst and accounted housetops, all kinds of rescues were Year later. g y made b home. We didn't have much in T remember y drove through Ana- the fors Angeles Times reported from for much ei the death toll. u mother Y to het the next day and the water was up Anaheim which along with nearby At- from Anaheim was swept about a mile the way of emergency services." to the running boards,"he recalled."We wood,was hardest hit."Water was 3 feel from her home and found dead with her A teenager at the time. Lorraine just drove through water.It wasn't like a deep in many homes and residents found baby in her arms. Bridges were de- Macias, 74. of Anaheim recalled the flowing river, it was standing water refuge on house lops. . . . More than a stroyed along Pacific Coast Highway. catastrophe. - everyplace." score of homes were demolished and Rail service was disrupted. School was "We left that evening when the water To ensure this wouldn't happen again, almost every structure in the city was canceled. was up to our waist,"she mid.'"Me only Ptedo Dam was built near Corona about damaged." "We were isolated," Orange County thing that saved our home is it was built a year later. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times q l 3/ 7/ L1=) S �/ Layoffs Upheld for L.A.'s DWP ■ Courts:Judge gives- would issue his ruling Iasi Monday, and trust we are not going to have he did not do so. Instead, during a to layoff these people." union five working days brief court session that day, he In an appeal to the rank and file, to file an appeal. Pressure apologised for not completing the Freeman said the umon's leaders are decision and blamed a heavy case the only thing that stands between rises for labor leaders to load and a lack of support staff, them and a settlement that includes reSUMe talks on buyouts. such as law clerks, for the delay. enhanced retirement benefits or y Before leaving the bench,he core- cash severance payments of$25,000 plained that compared to the fed- to$50,000."If they decide they don't BYJEFFBBY L RABIN eral courts,the Superior Court is"a want to settle,there will be layoffs." TIMES srA"warns poor and deprived stepchild." he warned LOS ANGEIM—Flatly reject- In the end, Lewin's ruling was Freeman expressed the hope ing union arguments, a Superior Just 31 lines long and did not cite a that"the facts of life will sink in." Court judge has upheld the Los single case to support his decision. Siegel said the last offer Freeman Angeles Department of Water and Siegel said the engineers and made was unacceptable. But the Power's right to lay off hundreds of architects group wiII file an appeal union spokesman did not rule out a workers as it prepares for a new Monday seeking to halt the layoffs. resumption in talks that began four era of competition in the deregu- '"Me employees are reeling, to months ago. "We're ready to get lated electric power business. say the least," said union member back to the bargaining table," he In a major defeat for the Engi- .Heidi Beas'"rhis is devastating." said.-Were awaiting a call." neers and Architects Assn., Judge The decision seemed certain inIn his brief decision.Lewin said. heighten pressure on the union's in effect, that he did not have the Etut injunction Lewin denied a preliminary to halt the impending leaders to restart stalled negoua- power to stop the deregulation of layoffsof r,'IS of its members who tions with DWP General Manager the electric business in California, layoffs S. David Freeman over a costly which will create competition for work at the DWP.However,Lewin buyout and severance package that utilities that have long operated as restrained the utility from pro- could obviate the need for layoffs. regulated monopolies. reeding with the layoffs far five Indeed, Freeman expressed the Echoing comments he made at business days so the union can hope that the union Tepresenta- the January hearing, Lewin said: appeal his ruling, fives would return to the bargain- "There is no more pervasive or But there was nothing in his ing table to negotiate a package complete change in the environ- two-page decision. completed late similar to the one accepted by the ment in which any enterprise op- Thursday and made available Fri- International Brotherhood of Elec. mates than the elimination of its day, to give the union comfort. trical Workers and the association monopolistic posture vis-a-vis a "Clearly we're disappointed," representing DWP managers. world tilled with hungry competi- spokesman Mark Siegel said. "We "What we have here is a very, tors.That is what inevitably ocouts wanted to win in this round." very large package that is avail- in deregulation, and no amount of Although Lewin indicated at a able for the employees affected," negotiation can restore the pmtec- hearing in late January that he Freeman said. "I hope and pray tion afforded by regulation."