HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-02-25 a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
February 18, 1998
NOTICE OF MEETING
phone:
(7141962-2411 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
abig'amrell: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
ep. ear 6127 NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
Fau 92722a SZ CA OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ctreee adore.:
1094,101.Avenue WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1998 - 7:30 P.M.
FwnC3in Valley.CA
92706-7018
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Member
Agenda.
0 The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
ciuea Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will
be held at the above location, time and date.
Anaheim
area
Buena Park
Cypress
Fountain Valley /
Fullerton
Harlington Beach
Irvine Ba4d Se'cLppry
La Habra
La Palme
Los Ahmaw.
rJewpart Beech henge Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings
Placentia
Sea a Ana
SealBeach
5enron tan.
Tosua STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 25. 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
Ville Perk
Vacua Linde
OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
County of Orange TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 4, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
sanitary Dlavicts PLANNING, DESIGN AND
caste Masa CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, March 5, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
Certain Grove
Midway City FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND
Water Dlsc;eta HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 11, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
Irnne Ranch STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 25, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed on Protecting the Environment Since 1954
JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Joint Board Meeting
March March 25, 1998
April April 22, 1998
May May 27, 1998
June June 24, 1998
July July 22, 1998
August August 26, 1998
September September 23, 1998
October October 28, 1998
November November 18, 1998
December December 16, 1998
January January 27, 1999
February February 24, 1999
March March 24, 1999
AGENDA
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3,5, 6,7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 EWS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 25, 1998—7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has
been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public '..
I inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
I In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion
and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 549542(b)as an emergency item, or that there '..
is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the '..
posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to
the meeting date.
1. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to
appointment of Directors, 'rf any.
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
5. Public Comments:All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters
of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be
deferred until the spec item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot
have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b).
02/25/98
Page 2 of 8
6. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous
matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no
action by the Directors.
a. Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and
awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
7. EACH DISTRICT
If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as
mailed and be so ordered by the Chair:
District 1 January 28 1998
District 2 January 28 1998
District 3 January 28 1998
District 5 January 28 1998
District 6 January 28 1998
District 7 January 28 1998
District 11 January 28 1998
District 13 January 28 1998
District 14 January 28 1998
8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each
Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District
represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.)
ALL DISTRICTS 12/10/97 12/24/97
Joint Operating Fund $1,711,503.46 $1,133,934.24
Capital Outlay Revolving fund 349,086.66 1,551,949.71
Self-Funded Insurance Funds 23,932.49 5.277.22
District No. 1 0.00 4,043.62
District No. 2 7,661.72 8,274.62
District No. 3 525.90 5.346.51
District No. 5 11,245.91 1,190.34
District No. 6 17.01 0.00
District No. 7 0.00 0.00
District No. 11 0.00 0.00
District No. 13 0.00 0.00
District No. 14 0.00 0.00
TOTALS $2.103.973.15 $2.710.015.26
02/25/98
Page 3 of 8
CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEM NOS. 9 - 14)
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a
Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions,
and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed
from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition
by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the
Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
9. Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and authorize award of a purchase order
contract for Uniform and Janitorial Articles Rental Service, Specification No. R-045, to Mission
Linen and Uniform Service for providing rental uniforms and various janitorial articles rental
service, at an estimated annual amount of$108,366.44.
10. Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Personal Injury and Negligence, Laraine Pipoly v.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 790053,
relative to alleged damages involving a Districts' employee; and authorize the Districts' General
Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
DISTRICT 2
11. Adopt Resolution No. 98-02-2, approving Utility Agreement No. 12257 with the State of Califomia,
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) providing for the reimbursement by Caltrans for all costs
to provide design management, construction management, inspection and associated costs for
modifications to Newhope-Placentia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-3A to accommodate the
1-5 Freeway widening for a total estimated amount of$90,000.
DISTRICT 3
12. Approve reimbursement agreement with Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD)
authorizing District No. 3 to deposit the sum of$109,000 with OCFCD for the cost of construction
and administration of construction and inspection for modifications to Magnolia Relief Sewer in
Western Avenue at the Fullerton Creek Channel Crossing, Contract No. 3-9-1.
02/25/98
Page 4 of 8
DISTRICT 3—(Continued from page 3)
13. Authorize execution of Quitclaim Deed of La Habra purchase line"W'to the current property
developer, Shea Homes of Southern California, Inc.
DISTRICT 7
14. Accept Grant of Easement from Irvine Community Development Company for proposed relocated
sewer, and authorize execution of Quitclaim Deed for existing sewer easement to Irvine
Community Development Company.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
15. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
02/25/98
Page 5 of 8
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
16. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re February 25, 1998 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee
Minutes for the meeting held on January 28, 1998 to be filed.
17. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re
February 4, 1998 meeting.
b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED(Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held
on February 4, 1998 to be filed.
C. Authorize staff to enter into a Lease Agreement with the County of Orange for installation
of an 800MHz system at Plant No. 2 for a period of twenty(20) years.
d. Approve project funding increase of$57,000 for the Primary Effluent Filtration Test
Program to cover additional project overhead caused by a change in accounting
procedures.
e. Approve out-of-country travel by Jane Train to attend the Printed Circuit Board Wastewater
Technologies Conference being held in Taiwan to present her technical paper, for one
week in March 1998; and, all travel, lodging, registration and per diem costs to be paid by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
f. Verbal report by Director of Technical Services re Status Report on Renewal Application
of NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit
18. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re February 5,
1998 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO
ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design
and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held February 5, 1998 to be filed.
C. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for plans and
specifications for the design of Automation of Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-60, and Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, for an amount not to
exceed $795,101; and increase the project budget amount from $5,638,000 to
$10,891,000 due to an expanded project scope.
02/25/98
Page 6 of 8
ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 5)
18. d. Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; authorize award of a contract
for Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, Job No. J-57, to First Fire Systems, Inc.,
for a total amount of$354,341.49; authorize an increase in the budget amount from
$507,000 to $560,000; and receive and file letters dated November 20, 1997 and
December 9, 1997 from West Star Construction submitting and subsequently withdrawing
their bid protest regarding bidder qualifications.
e. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for Orange
County Reclamation Project with the Orange County Water District, authorizing the both
general managers to expend funds subject to specified terms and conditions.
19. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re
February 11, 1998 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held
on February 11, 1998 to be filed.
C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 1998.
d. Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period
October 1 through December 31, 1997.
e. Renew Boiler& Machinery Insurance for the Districts for the period March 1, 1998 to
March 1, 1999,with Kemper Insurance Companies, in an amount not to exceed $71,286.
f. ITEM DELETED
g. Authorize award of an agreement for the substitution of Enterprise
Technologies to replace J.D. Edwards for the implementation portion of the Financial
Information System (Specification No. P-172),for an amount not to exceed$336,655.00.
h. Adopt Resolution No. 98-03, approving Amended Deferred Compensation Program for
Executive Management Group Employees and Management, Supervisory, Professional
and Confidential Employees, providing for incentive compensation heretofore called
"employer matching"and "employer non-matching contribubons"be designated as
supplemental salary, a part of the total remuneration paid to the employee.
i. Receive and file 1997-98 Mid-Year Financial and Operational Report for period ending
December 31, 1997.
02/25/98
Page 7 of 8
DISTRICT 5
20. Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the
plans and specifications; authorize award of a contract for Relocation of Lido Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-41-1, to Advanco Constructors, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $2,196,376;
authorize an increase in the budget allocation from $1,395,000 to$2,636,381; and authorize
execution of an Easement Agreement with the City of Newport Beach, increasing the previously
approved purchase price of$56,300 to$78,886.
DISTRICT 7
21. Receive and file letter from the Greubel Company dated January 8, 1998, and deny request to
reclassify the proposed residential development as commercial for the purpose of assessing
capital facilities connection fees based upon the provisions of the established ordinance.
22. ALL DISTRICTS
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chair may convene the Boards in
closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public
Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted dosed session and
are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Boards take final actions on
any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
1. Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County v. Penn Octane Corporation, at al., Orange County Superior Court
Case No. 790409 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]),
2. Confer with General Counsel regarding significant exposure to litigation, one
potential matter(Government Code Section 54956.9[b][1]).
b. Reconvene in regular session
C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
23. Matters that a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
02/25/98
Page 8 of 8
24. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report
25. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
26. Adjournments
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards,
Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days
preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items
submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
(714) 962-2411, eat. 7130
H �.vp dta�admm\BS6 gendat022598 doc
y
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 28, 1998
RICTS OF p9gh
yQ� z9 "o
z
z <
v a
vwv
7}IE
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
01/28/98
Page 2 of 8
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on January 28, 1998, at 7:30 p.m.,
in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the
roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,
13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT 1 X Pat McGul an Chair Thomas E. Lutz
NO.1 X James M. Fe an Chair ro tem Arthur Perry
X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz
X I Thomas R. Sahamili I Jim Potts
X I Todd Spitzer William G.Steiner
DISTRICT X Norman Z.Eckenrode Chair I Michael L. Maedzweiler
NO.2 X Mark A. Murphy,Chair pro tern I Joanne Coontz
X Steve Anderson I John Holmbe
X Don Bankhead I Jan Flory
X Bruce A. Broadwater Mark Le es
X John Collins Laurann Cook
X Barry Denes Richard A. Freschi
X Sumle Dunlap Glenn Parker
A John Gullixson Gene Wisner
X Pat MCGui an Thomas E. Lutz
X Todd S hzer Wiliam G.Steiner
A I Bob Zemel Tom Dal
DISTRICT X Mamie L. Rice Chair James V.Evans
NO.3 X Eva Miner-Bradford Chair pro tem Paul F.Walker
X Steve Anderson John Holmberg
X Don Bankhead Jan Flory
X George Brown Gwen Forsythe
X John Collins Lauren Cook
X Brian Donahue Harry M.Dotson
X Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker
X Mary Ann Jones Tom Camoll
X Mark Le es Bruce A.Broadwater
X Patsy Marshall I Jack Mauller
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
X Todd Spitzer William G.Steiner
X Dave Sullivan Tom Hannan
X Charles E. Sylvia Ronald Bates
A Bob Zama[ Tom Dal
DISTRICT I X Jan Debay, Chair John E. hl as
NO. 5 1 X I John E. Noyes, Chair pro tern I I Jan Deba
X I William G.Steiner I I Todd Spitzer
DISTRICT IX I James M. effyman, Chair Anhur Perry
NO.6 X William G. Steiner Chair pro tern ToddSpitzer
X I Jan Deba Tam W.Thomson
v
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
01/28/98
Page 3 of 8
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT X Thomas R. Seharelii Chair Jim Potts
NO. 7 Christina Shea, Chair pro tem X Barry Hammond
X Jan Debay John E. Noyes
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz
X William G. Steiner Todd Spitzer
DISTRICT X Shide Dettloff, Chair Tom Hannan
NO.11 X Dave Sullivan, Chairpro tem Tom Hannan
X I Todd Spitzer I William G. Steiner
DISTRICT X Burnie Dunlap, Chair Glenn Parker
NO. 13 1 A John Gullixson I Gene Wisner
X Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz
X William G. Steiner Todd Spitzer
A Bob Zemel Tom Del
DISTRICT Christina Shea, Chair X Barry Hammond
NO. 14 1 X I Thomas R. Sallerelli Chair pro tem Jim Potts
X I Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz
X I William G. Steiner Todd Spitzer
X I Peer A.Swan Darryl Miller
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant
General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Chris Dahl; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Bob
Oaten; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy Wheatley; Lisa Lorey; Jim Herberg; Mike Moore;
Chuck Winsor, Doug Stewart; John Linder, Paula Zeller, Dan Tunnicliff
OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel; Bill Knopf
DISTRICTS 2. 3. 11 & 13
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Consideration of motion to receive and file
minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors,
as follows: (•Mayor)
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
01/28198
Page 4 of 8
Citv/Aaencv District Active Director Alternate Director
Brea 2, 3 & 13 Burnie Dunlap Glenn G. Parker
Fountain Valley 2 &3 John Collins Laurann Cook'
Fullerton 2 &3 Don Bankhead' Jan Flory
Huntington Beach 3 Shirley Dettloff` Tom Hannan
3 &11 Dave Sullivan Tom Harman
Los Alamitos 3 Charles E. Sylvia Ronald Bates'
Midway City
Sanitary District 3 Margie L. Rice James V. Evans
Placentia 2 Norman Z. Eckenrode' Constance Underhill
Villa Park 2 Barry Denes Richard A. Freschi'
Yorba Linda 2 & 13 John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner*
DISTRICTS 2 &3
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Dorothy Rush of the
City of La Habra from the Boards of Directors of District Nos. 2 and 3, and seating first and
second alternates to the mayor, as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
2 &3 Steve Anderson John Holmberg
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Gerald Sigler of the City
of Buena Park from the Board of Directors of District No. 3, and seating first and second
alternates to the mayor, as follows:
Active Director Alternate Director
Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor David J. Shawver of the
City of Stanton from the Board of Directors of District No. 3, and seating first and second
alternates to the mayor, as follows:
Active Director Alternate Director
Brian Donahue Harry M. Dotson
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
01/28/98
Page 5 of 8
DISTRICT 13
The Joint Chair announced that the Chair pro tem of District No. 13 had been vacated by a
change in board representation and that election of a new Chair pro tem was in order.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Director John M. Gullixson was elected Chair pro
tem of District No. 13.
ALL DISTRICTS
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. 98-01, commending Neil
Cline, upon his retirement, for his outstanding contribution and dedication to public service as
General Manager of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA).
REPORT OF JOINT CHAIR
The Joint Chair reported that AMSA would be presenting the Districts its Gold Award at its
annual meeting in May. The Gold Award is presented to those agencies that had no discharge
permit violations during the past year.
Chair Collins also announced that the New Directors Workshop scheduled for January 31 had
been cancelled due to scheduling conflicts with new members. The Director of
Communications, Michelle Tuchman, would be contacting those members to reschedule the
workshop.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
The General Counsel reported that due to the consolidation efforts with an effective date of
July 1, 1998, the Steering Committee has scheduled the new District's first board meeting to be
held July 1. The agenda will be comprised of reaffirming ordinances and resolutions regarding
policies and procedures. Election of the Joint Chair would also be held at this meeting.
Elections for the individual District Chairs and Chairs pro tem normally take place at the May
Board meeting. However, the Steering Committee is recommending that the current Chairs
remain in office through June 300, as there will be no need for District Chairs or Chairs pro tem
thereafter.
Mr. Woodruff also stated there would be no need for closed session for item 17.b.2, as the case
had been settled.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts)
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
December 19, 1997, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
01/28/98
Page 6 of 8
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS (All Districts)
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District
claims set forth on exhibits"A"and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and
summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 11/12/97 11/26/97
Joint Operating Fund $1,285,072.00 $2,608,196.69
Capital Outlay Revolving fund 147,119.96 3,185,772.58
Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 26,043.09
District No. 1 0.00 0.00
District No. 2 6,311.14 1,625.63
District No. 3 0.00 8,715.00
District No. 5 0.00 0.00
District No. 6 0.00 3,446.43
District No. 7 6,162.22 35.00
District No. 11 0.00 41,374.16
District No. 13 0.00 0.00
District No. 14 0.00 0.00
TOTALS II 44.665.32 S5 875 206 58
Directors Mark Leyes and Todd Spitzer abstained.
CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL DISTRICTS
9. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt State Office of Emergency
Services Resolution for the purpose of obtaining federal and/or state financial assistance
in connection with winter stone of December 6, 1997.
10. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Reaffirm the Districts' prior commitment
to maintain all the terms and conditions of all the current agreements among County
Sanitation District 14, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the Irvine
Ranch Water District; and authorize the Joint Chairman to transmit a letter regarding the
CSDOC consolidation commitment to the Irvine Ranch Water District.
DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3 8 11
11.a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Inter-District Loan
Agreement for Capital Facilities between District Nos. 1 and 2 in the amount of
$6,300,000.00; and
11.b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Inter-District Loan Agreement
for Capital Facilities between District Nos. 3 and 11 in the amount of$4,000,000.00.
Director Margie Rice opposed the motion.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
01/28/98
Page 7 of 8
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
13.1b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was
presented by Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of Steering Committee, re the
January 28, 1998 meeting.
13.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve name change from the "County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County to the "Orange County Sanitation District"to
coincide with the July 1, 1998 consolidation date.
Director Mark Leyes opposed the motion.
14.b. AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN MINUTES: The Chair ordered the draft
Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the meeting held on
December 18, 1997 to be filed.
15.b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES : The Chair ordered the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 21, 1998 to be filed.
15.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurers Report for
the month of December 1997.
15.d. Item Deleted
15.e. DISTRICT 1
Ordinance No. 135, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program
by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees as Authorized by
the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04:
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE: Motion to
read Ordinance No. 135 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Motion to introduce Ordinance
No. 135.
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Motion to adopt Ordinance
No. 135.
151. ITEM DELETED
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
01/28/98
Page 8 of 8
15.g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Addendum No. 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc., for preparation of
Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J40-3, to provide additional planning and design
services in the amount of$397,239, for a total amount not to exceed $1,085,749; and,
extend the contract duration for an additional six months to April 1999.
15.h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation, approve plans and specifications and Addendum No. 1 to the plans
and specifications, authorize award of a contract for Replacement of Construction
Management Trailers at Plant No.2, Job No. P2-70, to Space Leasing Company, Inc., in
an amount not to exceed $183,989, to be executed by the Districts'General Manager.
DISTRICT 5
16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file bid tabulation and
recommendation, approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications, and
authorize award of a contract for Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract
No. 5-33-1, to Jerrold Corporation in the total amount of$29,813.00.
ALL DISTRICTS
17.a. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
(54956.9) (All Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at 8:12 p.m. pursuant
to Government Code Section 54956.9 to consider those items listed on the agenda as
Item No. 17(a) (1). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of
Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section
54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential
Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda
Item No. 17(a)(1).
17.b. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 8:30 p.m., the Boards
reconvened in regular session.
ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
t
Secretary oft oards of Dire ton of
County i DlAt Sanit Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6,
7. 11, 13 & 14
\trdonWefal\wall dminWWinutes 1M%0128N,MINUTES.doc
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 11R2197
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7724 BIo Gro Division $26,815.72 Residuals Removal MO 4.26-95
7725 County Of Orange $33,834.00 Digital Base Maps Of Streets
7726 Dell Marketing L.P. $51,630.94 Computers
7727 Della Dental $38.065.44 Dental Insurance Plan
7728 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $85,877.57 Natural Gas
7729 DP Mechanical $39,380.00 Data Alva Air Conditioning Unit
7730 FMC Cwpo28on-Chemical Products $67.012.38 Hydrogen Peroxide MO9-14-94
7731 Gierikh-Mitchell,Inc. $33.769.74 Pump Parts
7732 Kennh n Pacific,Inc. $54.707.92 Ferric Clodde MO 9.27-95
7733 Parker Diving Services,Inc. $63.012.00 Inspection Services MO 3-21.97
7734 Pima Gm Systems Inc $94,582.70 Residuals Removal MO 3-2945
7735 Southern California Edison $345.777.00 Power
7736 Southern California Edison $73,830.92 Power
7737 American Telephone&Telegraph-Megacem $3.332.19 Long Distance Telephone Services
7738 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR BR $11.95 Long Distance Telephone Services
7739 American Telephone&Telegraph-Pro Wafts $843.30 Long Distance Telephone Services
7740 A-Plus Systems $859.56 Notices&Ads
7741 Air Cold Supply $87.75 Air Conditioner Repairs
7742 Air Conditioning Specialties $165.27 Fifter Adhesive
ra 7743 Air Loupe America Corporation $518.73 Specialty Gasses
SX 7744 Allied Supply Co. $5,109.53 Mechanical Parts
H 7745 American Ammer $11.035.75 Travel Services
H7746 American Digital Technologies $3,426.68 Software
7747 Anthony Pest Control, Inc. $215.00 Service Agreement
q 7748 Appleone Employment Service $3,070.50 Temporary Employment Services
.� 7749 Applied Industrial Technology $354.14 Pump Paris
7750 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $3.000.00 Lab Analysis
7751 Arizona Instrument $987.18 Instrument Supplies
7752 Awards&Trophies By Bea $213.61 Plaques
7753 Assoc.of Metro Sewerage Agencies $16,295.00 Membership
7754 AWSI $229.00 D.O.T.Training Program
7755 Bailey Fischer&Polar Company $3.39 Chlorination Supplies
7756 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $1.699.85 Printing MO 11-7-94
7757 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $6,308.24 Telephone Installation
T758 Barclays Law Publishers $110.09 Publications
7759 Benz Engineering,Inc. $175.24 Compressor Pads
7760 Billings Industries $775.00 Made Monitoring Supplies
7761 Brawn And Caldwell $3,021.67 Engineering Services Res 93.101
7762 Budget Janitorial,Inc. 53,085.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94
7763 Bus&Associates Inc. $836.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25.97
7764 Calif Dept Of Transportation $56.00 Publications
7765 California Environmental Controls $766.82 Mechanical Parts
7766 Calotympic Safety $3,476.99 Safety Supplies
7767 Caftrol,Inc. $1,087.40 Hardware
7768 Came;Corporation $2,514.03 Fiber Optic Cable
7769 Capitol Weekly $149.00 Subscription
County Sanitation Dlatdcte Of Orange County
Claims Paid 11/12/97
Check No. Vernon, Amount Description
7770 Caron,Engineers $8,688.60 Engineering Services J-33-2
7771 Catapult Inc. $5.288.00 OnSBe Training
7772 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors $1,064.57 OIBce Furniture
7773 Central 820.00 Computer Services
7774 The City Assachres.Inc. $8,687.50 Hearing Officer Services
7775 Cole-Parmer Instrument Company $72.88 Lab Supplies
7776 Computers America,Inc. $2,020.41 Computer Supplies
7777 Core Way Western Express $76.53 Freight
7778 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $7,531.73 Electric Parts
7779 Consolidated Reprographics $362.44 Printing Services
7780 Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co $207.57 Plumbing Supplies
7781 Continente4McLaughlin $438.29 Toots
7782 Cooper Cameron Corporation $502.64 Engine Pads
7783 Core Laboratories,Inc 5400.00 Soils Testing
7784 Corporate Express $4.922.93 Office Supplies
T785 County Wholesale Electric Co. $2.994.33 Electric Parts
7786 Clone Pm Services $2.046.50 Crane Parts
7787 Mar Cddlebaugh $176.00 Insurance Premium Refund
7788 CNllgari Water 628.00 Soll Water Service
7769 CCI Technologies $2,083.60 Remove Data Cables
Iy 7790 CS Company $1.273.83 Plumbing Supplies
N 7791 CWEA 547500 Seminar Registration
H 7792 Day 8 N8e Door Service Inc. $2.187.50 Door Installation
q 7793 Diamond H Recognition $127.25 Service Awards
1
N 7794 Dlcksons,Inc. 82,782A0 Construction Services
7795 Dunn-Edwards Corporation E422.81 Paint Supplies
7798 Dycogr USA,Inc. $478.17 Truck Pads
7797 DGA Consultants.Inc. 812,644.78 Surveying Services MO 6.8-94
7798 ONE,Inc. $50.00 Compressor Parts
7799 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. $60.00 Medical Screening
7800 Elector-Bond $404.05 Equipment Repair
7501 Emergency Management Network $2,607.50 CPR I First Aid Training
7802 Encharder,Inc. $3,500.011 Ocean Monitoring MO5-24-95
7803 Enlightened Leadership International $399.00 Seminar Registration
7804 Environmental Resources Associated $2,282.50 Lab Services
7805 Federal Express $861.50 Air Freight
7806 Filter Supply Company $3,726.77 Filters
7807 Flat and Vertical,Inc. $152.00 Concrete Cutting
7808 Forked Engineering&Surveying $7.725.30 Engineering Services MO 6-25-97
78" Fountain Valley Camera $50.44 Photo Supplies
7810 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $308.17 Palm Supplies
7811 Founlaln Valley Rancho Auto Wash S825.52 Truck Wash Tickets
7812 Franklin Quest Co. $114.58 Office Supplies
7813 Freeway Sales and Service $198.62 Office Equipment
7814 Ganehl Lumber Company $73.43 Lumber/Hardware
7816 Garralt-Callahan Company $2.881.24 Chemicals
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Clalms Paid 11/12/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7816 GTE California $1.802.58 Telephone Services
7817 Getinge Castle $938.00 Lab Supplies
7818 Govemment Institutes Inc. $85.00 Publication
7819 Graphic Distributors $505.35 Photographic Supplies
7020 Granby STl $785.67 Engine Parts
7821 The Great American Printing Cc $420.08 Printing Services
7822 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $397.90 Janitorial Supplies
7823 The Hacienda $399.35 Executive Management Retreat Expense
7824 Harrington Industrial Plastics $63.48 Plumbing Supplies
7025 HIM Inc $7,898.31 Tools
7826 Hoerblger Service Inc $244.54 Compressor Parts
7827 Home Depot $68.21 Small Hardware
7828 City of Huntington Beach $13,416.41 Water Use
7829 J.P.Nissen Co S42.56 Office Supplies
7830 Jamison Englneertn9.Inc. $2,927.50 Construction Services
7931 Jay's Catering $352.34 Directore Meetng Expense
7832 Jendham,Inc. $545.00 Seminar Regislra8on
7833 Johnstone Supply $138.20 Electric Pans
7634 Keith D Stokenbach,PH.D.,P. $15.900.00 Ocean Monitoring
7835 Kennedy Hydraulics $919.11 Motor Repairs
r.y 7836 Keys Productivity Center 5125.00 Seminar Registration
7837 Knox lrNustrial Supplies $2.525.53 Tools
'3 7838 L.A.Cenular Telephone Company $2,150.43 Cellular Telephone Service
b 7839 L.abware Inc. 5600.00 Training Registration
w 7840 LaserAll Corporation $2,435.72 Service Agreement
7941 Law/Crandall $6,278.50 Soil Testing M0 7.13-94
7842 Leadership Directories 5637.00 Subscription
7843 Leadership Directories $1,210.30 Subscriptions
7844 Manhole Adjusting $6,305.00 Sewer Repairs
7845 Mar Vac Electronics $14.10 Instrument Supplies
7846 MC Junkin Corp E100.06 Plumbing Supplies
7847 MrMaSter-Cam Supply Co. $926.69 Tools
7848 Measurement Variables,Inc. $1.265.08 Filters
7849 Mac Analytical System S4,743.00 Ocean Mondomrg
7850 Medlin Controls Co. $50.96 Instrument Supplies
7851 Mellon Trust $14,977.31 Investrnenl Custodian Bank
7852 Milltronics Inc $559.01 Electric Supplies
7853 Mission Undone Service 52,239.15 Uniform Rentals
7854 Mobile Modular Management Corp $344.80 Once Trailer Lease
7855 Motophoto $13.54 Photographic Services
7856 MPS Photographic Services,Inc $98.61 Photographic Services
7857 National Microeomp Services, $3,370.00 Malmenance Agreement
7858 New Horizons Computer Leaming S2,OD0.00 On-She Training
7659 City of Newport Beach $125.18 Water Use
7860 Omni Western Incorporated $75.98 Tools
7861 Optlo Software $1,651.74 Professional Services
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 11H2/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7862 Orange County Farm Supply Co. $21.24 Chemicals
7863 Oxygen Service Company $4,328.39 Specialty Gases
7864 Pacific Bell $29.90 Telephone Services
7865 Pacific Mechanical Supply $1.346.40 Plumbing Supplies
7866 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. $1,034.02 Instrument Supplies
7867 Parkhouse Tire Inc $311.89 Truck Tim
7868 Pet.Animal Supplies $104.20 Lab Supplies
7869 Photoron U.S.A.,Ina $392.00 Lab Supplies
7870 Polypuro,Inc.Wor Polydyne $23,071.51 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92
7871 Power Machine Co. $553.15 Pump Pans
7872 Red Wng Shoes $122.40 Reimbursable Safety Shoos
7873 Relsh Marine Studies,Inc. $320.00 Ocean Monitoring
7874 Remedy $16,193.45 Temporary Employment Services
7675 RPM Electric Motors $1.713.13 Electric Motor Parts
7876 S&J Supply Cc Inc $751.49 Pump Pads
7877 Sancen Engineering,Inc. $6.850.00 Engineering Services
7878 Science Applications Intl.,Cc 53,601.53 Ocean Monitoring MO 6894
7879 ScoB Specially Gases Inc. $256.50 specialty Gases
7880 Secxm"un $709.15 Light Fixtures
7881 Shureluck Sales B Engineering $2,025.37 Tools/Hardware
F+ 7882 Sigmas Aldrich,Inc. $168.48 Lab Supplies
tt 7883 Smith Pipe 8 Supply Inc. $469.84 Plumbing Supplies
y 7884 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $171.90 Permit Fees
q 7885 South Coast Water $125.00 Lab Supplies
I 7888 Southem California Water 585.56 Water Use
a 7887 ScuMwest Scientific Inc. $1,149.15 Meter
9588 Spading Instrument Co.,Inc $4.764.49 Meter
7889 Standard and Pours Corp. $2.500.00 COP Contract Service
7890 Slate Chemical Mfg.Co. $342.09 Lube Oil
7891 Corporate Trust $5.795.50 COP Trustee Services
7892 Sumet Ford $93.27 Truck Parts
7893 SWRCB Accounting Office $10,000,00 Annual Permit
7894 Texas Commerce Bank National Association $8.371.12 COP Trustee Services
7895 The Register $793.80 Notices&Ads
7896 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $2.558.76 Mechanical Parts
7597 Time Motion Tools $8460 Electric Pads
7898 Time Warner Communications $86.22 Cable Services
7899 Aerofund FinanciaVTop Hat Productions $125.37 Directors'Meeting Expense
7900 Tropical Plaza Nursery.Inc. $3,973.84 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94
7901 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $3662 Truck Parts
7902 Michelle Tuchman $128,39 Expense Rehob.
7903 TCH Associates,Ix. $3,451.80 Water Sampler Bottles
7904 United Concrete Companies $312.08 Concrete
7905 United Parcel Service $28.82 Parcel Services
7906 Valley Cities Supply Company $5,053.90 Plumbing Supplies
7907 umaloboa 5 Associates $895.18 Enghree ding Services
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 11112/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7908 VWR Scientific Products $7.330.24 Lab Supplies
7909 The Wackenhut Comorellon 52,975.28 Contract Service-Security Guards
7910 The Wait Street Journal $23.17 Subscription
7911 Waste Markets $12,060.76 Residuals Removal MO 3-27-96
7912 Wesc,Distribution Inc. $1,216.45 Instrument Supplies
7213 Western Slates Chemical Inc. $12,091.47 Caustic Soda NO 8.23-95
7914 WCS Distributing $1,865.73 Bleach Tank Repair
7915 Xerox Corporalion E2,71864 Copier Leases
7910 Blake Anderson $99.00 Expense Relmb.
7917 Nicholas J.Arhontes $958.37 Expense Relmb.
7910 J Use Corson $214.53 Expense Reimb.
7919 David P.Halverson $287.65 Expense Relmb.
7920 Vladhnir A.Kogan $820.70 Expense Reimb.
7421 David A Ludwin $1.489.30 Expense Reimb.
7922 Kathleen T.Mllles, $295.00 Expense Relmb.
7923 Michael D.Moore $087.75 Expense Reimb.
7924 Samuel L.Mowbray $164,47 Expense Reimb.
7925 Michael L.Paleness 9246.44 Expense Reimb.
7926 Douglas M.Stewart $1.739.50 Expense Relmb.
7927 Robed C.Thompson $376.43 Expense Reimb.
7926 Edward M.Tones $733,69 Expense Rehnb.
H7929 Compuxprass And Cad Herdgstsd $1,152D6 Employee Computer Loan Prepare
7930 Computimus And Henry Lorimer $2.021.05 Employee Computer Loan Program
Y 7931 Compuxpress And Patrick Bounly E1,997AS Employee Computer Loan Program
Ln 7932 County of Orange $1,950,00 Administrative Fees
7933 County Sanitation District of OC $907.66 Petty Cash Reimb,
7934 PC Club-South Coast And Dianne Kardoa $3.000,00 Employee Computer Loan Program
7935 Stele Chemical Mfg.Co. E125.96 Oil
Total Claims Paid/1112/97 E1,441.665.32
Summary Amount
Dlstdct No.2 $6,311.14
District No.7 $6.162.22
CORF $147,119.96
Joint Operations $1,205,072.00
E1,41/,685.12
County sanitation Districts Of orange county
Claims Paid 11128197
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7957 Bid Gro Division $25.362.27 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
7958 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $260.730.00 Engineering Services
7959 Carollo Engineers $86.805.52 Engineering Servloea J-33.2
7960 Colich&Sons Inc.,DBA Colich 541,374.16 Conslmctlon 11-17-1
7961 County of Orange $1.264.786.23 Special Assessment User Fees Overpayment
7962 Kemiron Pacific,Inc. $76.314.08 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95
7963 Orange County Water District $50,419.20 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96
7984 Pima On,Systems Inc $96,165.24 Residuals Removal MO 3-29.95
7965 Science Applications Intl.,Cc $111.741.88 Ocean Monitoring M06-8-94
79M Southern California Edison 549,983.68 Power
7967 Tub Ranch/Magan Farms $93.881.18 Residuals Removal
7968 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $120.788.74 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No,C-044
7969 Western Stales Chemical Inc. $29,529.53 Caustic Sdda MO&23-95
7970 Woodruff.Spradlin&Smart $61.856.57 Legal Services MO 7-26-95
7971 Advance Constructors Inc 5418.994.10 Construction J-34-1,P2-35.5
7972 Algol Construction,Inc. $62,973.38 Construction PI-51R
7973 Margate Construction Inc. $2,172,084.74 Construction PI-36.2
7974 Svmdmp CM!,Inc. $242,487.00 Constuction P2-35-3,P1-38-5,P246,P2-55
7975 Amedcan Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $14.46 Lang Distance Telephone Services
7976 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $4.30 Long Distance Telephone Services
7977 A-Plus Systems $2.187.42 Noticas&Ads
7978 Air Products and Chemicals,Inc. $22,500.00 O&M Agreement Oxy Gan.Syst.MO 8489
H 7979 Allboume Express $29.25 Air Freight
7080 Amedcan Management Association $290.00 Seminar Registration
7981 American Sigma,Inc. $975.70 Mechanical Supplies
7982 Appleolre Employment Service $2,084.49 Temporary Employment Services
7983 Applied Industrial Technology $31.54 Pump Perk
7984 Aquatic Bloassay And Consulting $235.00 Lob Supplies
7985 Aquatic Center $40.00 Air Tanks
7986 Aquatic Tasting Laboretodes $4,000.00 Lab Analysis
7987 AtklNJones Computer Services $842.60 Service Agreement
7988 Auto Club of Southern California $1,503.33 Claim Settlement
7989 Awards It Trophies By Bea $124.38 Plaques
7990 ARK Technologies $5,720.00 Professional Services
7991 ASTD Publishing Service $48.00 Publication
7992 Balance Consulting,Inc. $335.00 Seminar Registration
7983 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $5,679.30 Telephone Installation
7994 Barclays Law Publishers $99.00 Publication
7995 Burma&Noble Books $3.840.17 Subscription
7995 SloMedsux Vnek,Inc $1,488.00 Lab Supplies
7997 Brown And Caldwell $705.51 Engineering Services Res 93-101
7998 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $520.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94
7999 Bureau of National Affairs $1,648.58 Software
8000 CalGlass,Inc. $37.72 Lab Supplies
8001 California Relocation Services $242.50 File Moving Services
8002 Catapult Inc. $4,000.00 OnSfte Computer Training
County Sanilallon Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 11/26197
Check No. Vendor Amount Descrlpllen
8003 Centrepolnte Commercial Inledors $5,097.15 Once Furniture
on" Capp Corp $4.323.83 Safety Supplies
8005 Chapman Counseling $8.200.00 Employee Training
8006 Chrome Crankshaft Co. $50.00 Pump Parts
8007 City or Founlaln Valley $860.00 Water Use
8008 Clayton Environmental Consultants 82,214.28 Professional Services
8009 Closson B Clossen $1,610.50 Landscape Construction Management
8010 Coast Fire Equipment $406.59 Service Agreement
6011 Cemmunicailons Performance Group $23,918.40 Professional Services
6012 Compueerve Incorporated $992.90 Computer Services
8013 Continenlal-McLaughlin S433.81 Toole
8014 Cooper Cameron Corporation $11.377.56 Engine Parts
8015 Core Laboratories,Inc $600.00 Soils Testing
8016 Corporate Express $1,047.68 Office Supplies
8017 Canty 0f Orange $9.442.34 Municipal Radio Services
8018 County Sanitation Districts of OC $24,539.76 Workers Comp Relmb.
8019 Culligan Water $28.00 Son Water Service
8020 CCI Technologies $960.00 Remove Data Cables
8021 D 8 S Conveyors $876.00 Equipment Repair
8022 Detevau6 $110.00 Offshe Bach-Up Tape Storage
H 8023 David E.Libert,Ph.D. $1.750.00 Management Training
y 8024 Do Guelle 8 Sons Glass Co. E283.44 Safety Glass
8025 Dal Mar Analytical $760.00 Biosclids Analysis
tj 8026 Dell Marketing L.P. $15,556.93 Computers
ry 8027 Diamond H Recopuron $66.12 Service Awards
8028 Dietedch-Past $532.01 Clamps
8029 Dover Elevator Company $3.441.00 Elevator Maintenance
$030 Dunn-Edwerds Corporation $1,724.60 Petal Supplles
8031 Duthie Generator Service,Inc. $12.600.00 Equipment Rental
8032 DGA Consultants,Inc. $8,715.00 Surveying Services NO 6.8-94
8033 DME.Inc. $861.29 Compressor Parts
6034 Electra Bond,Inc. $588.94 Equipment Repair
8035 Emergency Management Network $720.00 CPR First Aid Tralning
8038 Enchanter,Inc. $4.200.00 Ocean Monitoring NO 5-2495
8037 Environmental Resources Association $1.274.10 Lab Services
8038 Envision Of Irvine And Charles Reed $1.376.10 Employee Computer Lean Program
8039 Expedan $117.92 Orange County Property Information
804D ENS Resources,Inc. $1,181.01 Professional Services
8041 FelrbaMca Scales,Inc. $1,600.00 Service Agreement
8042 Federal Express $605.00 Air Freight
8043 Flberbon $383.49 Fiber Optic Cable
8044 Fisher Scientiftc $6,219.14 Lab Supplies
8D45 Flo-Systems,Inc. $1.063.52 Pump Parts
8D46 Forked Engineering B Surveying $4.928.50 Engineering Services MO&25.97
8047 Richards Copied Corporation $850.00 Office Supplies
8048 Fodis Benefits Insurance Comp $8,469.45 Dlsabllily,Insurance Premiums Oct 97
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 1126197
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8049 City of Fountain Valley $11.842.32 Water Use
8050 Fuzee Paint and Wallcovering E332.95 Paint Supplies
8051 Fry's Eloclrontts $21.54 Electronic&Computer Supplies
8052 The Gas Company $20,892.35 Natural Gas
8053 Gauge Repair Service $195.00 Equipment Repair
$054 General Petroleum $17,043.19 Unleaded Gasoline
BOss GTE California $6,044.68 Telephone Services
805E Galdemwest Window Service $1,658.00 Window Cleaning Service
8057 Great Pacific Equipment Co. $1.346.98 Cane Rental
8058 Guy L.Warden&Sons 5474.72 Compressor Pads
8059 Edwards Systems Technology E1,462.50 Service Agreement
8060 Hecker Equipment Company $1,892,00 Truck Parts
8061 Haack Primrose Ice 548.00 Ice For Samples
8062 Hamngton Industrial Plastics 3208.60 Plumbing Supplies
6063 Hatch&Khk Inc. $840.45 Truck Pads
8064 Hadoway Storage Containers 81,035.00 Container Rentals
8065 Here's Blsckforest Bakery&Dell BOSS Directoe Meeting Expense
8066 Hersey Measurement Company $547.06 Equipment Repair
M 8067 Hill Inc $359.35 Tools
5xt BW8 Holmes&Narver Inc 54,342.29 Engineering Services
H 8069 Home Depot $624.19 Small Hardware
to 8070 Herbs,Instruments Inc $1.557.12 Electric Pads
"3 8071 Hub Auto Supply $202.10 Truck Pads
rd 8072 Hughes Aircraft Co. $3,446.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
w 0073 HI Standard Automotive $77.58 Tack Parts
8074 Industrial Hearing&Pulmonary $3,195.00 Audiomelric&Pulmonary Testing Of Employees
8075 Industrial Threaded Products, $2,953.82 Connectors
8076 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $199.45 Lab Supplies
8077 Interstate Battery Systems $658.89 Batteries
8070 Irvine Ranch Water Dislrids $47.46 Water Use
8079 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $1,091.47 Instrument Pads
8080 Jays Catering $829.60 Directors'Meeting Expense
8081 Jim's Suspension Service $25.00 Truck Repairs
8082 Johnstone Supply $1,839.22 Electric Pads
8083 Kelly Paper 5276.45 Paper
8084 Kennedy Hydraulics $4,181.39 Motor Repair
8085 Kewaunee Scientific Corporation $15.834.92 Office Furniture
8086 Knox Industrial Supplies $4.798.30 Tools
8087 Labware Inc. $750.00 Consulting Services MO 2-26-97
8088 Law/Candell $2.360.00 Sol Testing 7-13-94
8089 Local Agency Formation Commission $5,000.00 CSDOC Consolidation Review Fee
8090 Ludolph T.Loakner $206.23 Electric Parts Reimb,
8091 Los Angeles Galvanizing Company $161.63 Steel
8092 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $1,364.08 Tools
8093 Medlin Controls Co. $423.29 Instrument Supplies
8094 Microfilm Laboratories.Inc. E720.00 Gas Analysis
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 1 W6/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8D95 Midway Mfg&Machining Co $4,099.61 Mechanical Repaid;
8096 Mlltironlcs Inc $1.480,44 Electric Supplies
8097 Mission Uniform Service $3,708,99 Uniform Rentals
8098 Mitchell Repair Information Co $560,51 Instrument
8099 MotoPhoto $55.65 Photographic Services
8100 MPS Photographic Services,Inc $222.90 Photographic Services
8101 Net West Markets $1.250.00 COP Interest Draw Fees
8102 National Information Data Center $48,90 Publication
8103 National Research Council Canada $174,00 Publication
8104 New Pig $825.94 Generator Pads
8105 Nictey Petroleum Co Inc $63388 Lubricants
8106 Norcal Controls Incorporated $468.57 Instrument Parts
8107 NO AWWAANEA $100.00 Conference Registration
8108 Office Depot Business Services $4.055,10 Office Supplies
6109 Optio Software $210.00 Software
silo Orange County Industrial Plastics $2,95000 Plastic Sheets
Bill Orange County Red Cross $7600 Safety Training
8112 Orange Courier $20.70 Courier Services
m,m 8113 Oxygen Service Company $3,229.91 Specialty Gases
SX 8114 OCV Control Valves $185.19 Valve Pads
8115 P.L.Hawn Company Inc. $10,281.89 Electric Supplies
H 8116 Pacific Ball $85.15 Telephone Services
8117 Pacific Mechanical Supply $5.49900 Plumbing Supplles
Silo Pacific Pads and Controls,Inc $9.502.26 Instrument Parts
ua silo Padgett-Thompson $139.00 Seminar Registration
8120 Padre Jandoral Supplies 5687.21 Janitorial Supplies
8121 Pak West $17.12 Janitorial Supplies
$122 Parkhouse Tim Inc $319.13 Tires
8123 Pads Unlimited $799.65 Tmtlr Pads
8124 Pitney Bowes $323.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement
8125 Polypure.Inc.Wor Polydyne,Inc. $24.405.60 Callonic Polymer MO 3.11-92
0126 Prentice Hall Wor Simon&Schuster $54.52 Publication
8127 Pryor Resources,Inc. $26700 Seminar Registration
8128 Reaeirne Systems Corporation $1.341.12 Consulting Services
8129 Reliastar $8.338.00 Life Insurance Premium
8130 Remedy $4.201.87 Temporary Employment Services
8131 Adrian,Renescu $1,397.72 Expense Relmb.
8132 Rosen's Electrical Equipment Co. $2,198.51 Electric Pads
8133 Ryan Herce Products Corp. $1.425.68 Pump Parts
8134 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. $211.62 Paint Supplies
8135 Wery-Nleen $153.50 Equipment Repair
8136 Scentech,Inc $2.500.00 Sewer System Atlas
8137 Screwing America,Inc. $539.47 Pump Parts
8138 Seam $738.24 Freezer Parts
$139 Service Were Inc. $20.00 Seminar Registration
8140 Shumluck Sales&Engineering $711.15 Tools I Hardware
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 1126197
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
0141 Snap-On Incorporated $682.09 Tools
8142 Southern California Alt Cold. $462.12 Compressor Parts
8143 Southern California Marine Institute $1,930.00 Rental Equipment
6144 Sph eco Inc. $1.443.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
8145 Spam $32AD Telephone Services
8146 Starnaet Inc. $16.025.88 Computer
8147 Stanford Video Media Group $524.27 Training Videos
8148 State Board Of Equalization $199.08 Underground Petroleum Storage Fee
8149 SlateNal $165.00 Seminar Registration
8150 Sammit Steal $1,987.25 Metal
8151 Sunset Ford $52.82 Truck Pads
8152 SARBSLWFA 826.00 Conference Registration
8153 Technomic Publishing Company $144.95 Publication
8164 The Holman Group 8T72.48 EAP Premium Oct 97
8155 Thomas Gray 8 Associates,Inc. $330.00 Safety Testing
11156 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc $17,760.84 Mechanical Parts
8157 Tidepool SclentlBc Software $654.50 Software
8158 Trenchless Technology $350.00 Seminar Registration
8159 Treplal Plaza Nursery,Inc. $12.079.00 Contract Groundskeeping M05-11-94
also Truck a Auto Supply.Inc. $635.76 Truck Pads
H alai Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $3,245.60 Lab Services
8162 TCH Associates,Inc. 9988.72 Lab Supplies
"3 8163 TWComcorp Communications Supplies $3,167.10 Telephone Equipment
bra 8164 U.S.Filter $1,262.75 Lab Supplies
to $165 U.S.Postal Service $5,000.00 Postage
oleo United Concrete Companies $318.33 Concrete
8167 United Parcel Service $755.15 Parcel Services
8168 University of Nevada,Las Vegas $750.00 Seminar Registration
8169 Vako Instruments Co.Inc. $329.24 Valve Parts
8170 Valley Cities Supply Company 33,016.66 Plumbing Supplies
8171 Van Waters 8 Rogers Inc. $3,636.66 Chemicals
8172 Vertex Business Systems $1,360.00 Computer Data Support
8173 Village Nurseries $42.01 Landscaping Supplies
8174 VWR Scientific Produce $2.526.16 Lab Supplies
8175 W.D.Preut Company 8781.89 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
8176 The Wackenhut Corporation $5,976.19 Contract Service-Security Guards
8177 WW Grainger Inc. 83,735.07 Compression Pads
8178 Xerml Corporation $1,147.00 Copier Losses
8179 Moyasar T.Yahya $1,198.95 Expense RelmD.
also Blake Anderson $83.18 Expense Reimb.
alai Mark Castillo $1,220.10 Expense Reimb.
8182 Gregory R.Mathews $494.56 Expense Reads.
8183 Charles D.McGee $180.83 Expense Reimb.
0194 Donald F.McIntyre $69.62 Expense Reimb.
8185 Dawn M.MCXmley $2,175.00 Seminar Registration Reimb.
8186 Christopher M.Pelletier $859.45 Expense Reimb.
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 11/26/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8187 Edward M.Torres $239.04 Expense Relmb.
8188 William F.Webster,Jr $476.45 Expense Reimb.
8189 Nancy J.Wheatley $1.276.26 Expense Reimb.
8190 Charles F.Winsor $1.987.74 Expense Reimb.
8191 County of Orange $1.020.00 Administrative Fees
8192 Coumyef Orange $945.00 Administrative Fees
8193 County Sanitation District of OC $1.720.48 Petty Cash Reimb.
8194 Slfimn Ave Inc.Complr.and Randy Harris $1,176.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
0195 Perna Benefits Innuramca Comp $9,190.97 Disability Insurance Premlums
$196 Rellester $4,827.40 Life Insurance Premium
8197 Southern California Edison $6,255.20 Power
8198 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 850.00 Traffic Grate
8199 Custers Map Stand $452.55 Thomas Bros.Wall Maps
0200 Olehl,Evans&Co.,LLP $375.00 Seminar Registration
8201 Padgett-Thompson $139.00 Seminar Regshation
8202 Reliashur $8.153.06 Line Insurance Premium
8203 Mahm Telebi $1,098.55 Expense Reimb.
8207 Sfemon,Larsen&Marsh $8.000.00 Professional Services
Total Claims Paid 112SM7 $5,875,208.58
H
bJ
H
�H1
°` Summary Amount
District No.2 $1,626.63
District No.3 $8.715.00
District No.6 $3.445.43
District No.7 $35.00
District No. 11 $41,374.16
CORP $3,185,772.68
San Insurance Funds $26.043.09
Joint Operations $2,608.196.69
S,67S,208.58
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA REPORT em Number I Item yymeer
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California •Y
FROM: Gary Streed.
SUBJECT: Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts by Roll Call Vote.
(Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same
for each district represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently
for any District).
Staff recommends ratification of payment of claims in accordance with the attached
check listing.
SUMMARY
See attached check listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
N F�y.NVn]]plypaWgapa PWv Fdm�1
Page 1
CEQA FINDINGS
r
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Copies of Claims Paid reports from 12/10/97 and 12/24/97.
NY NVn�VpWs Rp FmmW
v Page 2
R. 11
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 12/10/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
$224 Bib Gro Dlviafen $32,792.98 Residuals Removal MO 4-28-95
8225 Contra Corporation $37,437.04 Fiber Optic Cable
8226 Carollo Engineers $77,008.94 Engineering Services J-33.2
8227 Chapman Counseling $56,025.00 Employee Training
8228 Delta Dental $34,945.86 Daniel Insurance Plan
8229 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $99.947.67 Natural Gas
8230 Edison Co. $53.765.04 Power
8231 Harbour Engineering Group $26,952.71 Mechanical Parts
8232 Kemiron Pedfic,Inc. $89,969.86 Ferric Chloride 19-27-95
8233 Not West Markets $67,984.49 COP Interest Draw Fees
82N National Plant Services,Inc. $76.073.30 Vacuum Truck Services
8235 Pacific Investment Management $118,283.01D Investment Mgml.Service Res.95.75
8236 PobRcare of Ca $61,860.62 Medical insurance Premium
8237 Peinewebber Incorporated $60.188.57 COP Remarketing Agreement
8238 Pima Gro Systems Inc $101,923.51 Residuals Removal NO3-29-95
8239 Polypum,Inc.Wor Polydyne $50.504.47 Cationic Polymer NO 34142
8240 Power Generation Consulting $65.984.00 Generator Maintenance
8241 R W Beck $40.563.90 Professional Services NO 7-30.97
B242 Science Applications Intl.,Co. $50,072.45 Ocean Monitoring MO6-e-94
8243 Sonic Systems, Inc. $43,078.45 Computer Parts
82" Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $60,694.00 Construction 7-7-1
0245 Tula Ranch/Magan Fears $43.305.35 Residuals Removal
8246 American Telephone&Telegraph-Magacom &2,951.88 Lang Distance Telephone Services
8247 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $9.82 Long Distance Telephone Services
8248 American Telephone&Telegraph-Megacem $843.30 Long Distance Telephone Services
8249 A-Plus Systems $669.60 Notices&Ads
8250 Abrasive Engineering Tool&Equipment $293.72 Hardware
8251 Air Products and Chemicals,In $22.500.00 O&M Agreement Oxy Gan.Syst.NO"-89
8252 American Management Association $126.00 Seminar Registration
8253 Anthony Peat Control,Inc. $1110.00 Service Agreement
B254 Appleone Employment Service $4.053.00 Temporary Employment Services
8255 Applied Industrial Technology $4.67 Pump Paris
8256 Arizona Instrument $1,267.25 Instrument Supplies
8257 Armor-Vac $960.00 Vacuum Truck Services
8258 Arta Disposal Service,Inc. $310.40 Toxic Waste Removal
8259 Asbury Environmental Services $35.00 Waste Oil Removal
8260 Awards&Trophies By Bea $22.63 Plaques
8261 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. $18.400.00 Professional Services
8262 ATM AA Inc $1,011.00 Lab Services
8263 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $16,461.64 Printing MO 11-7-94
82M Bank of America $301.07 Banking Services
8265 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $376.00 Telephone Installation
8266 Basler Electric Company $474.45 Electric Parts
8267 Battelle $9.000.00 Professional Services M03.27-96
8268 Battery Specialties $387.98 Batteries
8269 Beacon Bey Enterprises $57.70 Truck Wash Tickets,
8270 Black&Veatch $20.980.00 Engineering Services P1-46
8271 Brown And Cantwell $2,662.21 Engineering Services Res 93-101
8272 Bush&Associates Inc. $1,048.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 12H0197
Check No. Vendor Amount Descrotion
8273 C.P.I. $767.44 Lab Supplies
8274 Califomla Automatic Gate $187.24 Service Agreement
8275 California Industrial Fabric $716.31 Weight Sags
8276 Caloympic Safety $7.774.81 Safety Supplies
8277 Career Track Seminars MS2 $596.00 Seminar Registration
8278 Carl Warren&Co. $2,208.20 Insurance Claims Administrator
8279 Center for Demographic Research $25.00 Dwelling Unit Count
8280 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors 52,447.35 Office Furniture
8281 Capp Corp $948.20 IERP Supplies
8282 Cerfnel $20.00 Computer Services
8283 Certified Appliance Co $57.70 Mircewave Repair
8284 Charles P.Crowley Co. $2,446.94 Instrument Pads
8285 City of Seal Beach $159.84 Water Use
8286 Coast Fire Equipment $1,292.18 Service Agreement
8287 Coast Rubber Stamp,Mfg. $615.78 Office Supplies
8288 Communications Performance Group $10,533.60 Professional Services
8289 Compressor Components Of California $4,776.00 Compressor Repair
8290 CompuMaster $395.00 Seminar Registration
8291 Connell GM Parts $268.76 Truck Pads
8292 Consolidated Reprographics $1,269.08 Printing Services
8293 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co $29.23 Plumbing Supplies
8294 Continental-McLaughlin $715.33 Tools
8295 Contractors Equipment Cc $1,465A7 Crane Rental
8296 Converse Consultants $4.682.70 Consulting Services MO 8.11-93
8297 Cooper Camoron Corporation $5,172.00 Engine Parts
8298 Copelce Capital,Inc. $1,432.00 Color Copier Lease
8299 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $8.40 Truck Pads
8300 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. $425.34 Mechanical Supplies
8301 County of Orange-Auditor Controller $53.00 Permits
8302 CASA $175.00 Conference Registration
8303 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $679.05 Electric Pads
83N CEPA Company $668.00 Recertificallan
8305 Creative Power Management $4,200.00 Professional Services
83M CS Company $2,684.56 Plumbing Supplies
8307 California Society of Municipal Finance Officers $80.00 Luncheon Meeting
8308 David E.Libed,Ph.D. $876.00 ManagemenlTralning
8309 Del Mar Analytical $190.00 Biosolids Analysis
8310 Dell Direct Sales L.P. $8,516.88 Computers
8311 DeZudck $7,431.59 Valves
8312 Diamond H RocOgnftlon $728.88 Service Awards
8313 Dover Elevator Company $1.065.00 Elevator Maintenance
8314 DGA Consultants,Inc. $11.701.52 Surveying Services NO 8-10.94
8315 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. $4,455.00 Medical Screening
8316 Edwards High Vacuum International $80.82 Lab Supplies
8317 Elsevier Advanced Technologies $163.78 Publication
8318 Executive Excellence $400.00 Membership
8319 Express Paper&Graphics Store $129.21 Paper
8320 Fiberlron $542.76 Fiber Optic Cable
8321 Fisher Scientific $1,31l.53 Lab Supplies
•C
-e
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Clalms Paid 12/10/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Descrlptlon
8322 Fluid Components Intl. $1,993.69 Electric Pens
8323 Fountain Valley Camera $130.40 Photo Supplies
8324 Fountain Valley Rancho Auto Wash $414.00 Truck Wash Tickets
8325 Franklin Quest $167.55 Office Supplies
B326 Fry's Electronic $990.98 Electronic B Computer Supplies
8327 City of Fullerton $255.75 Water Use
8328 Ganahl Lumber Company $122.68 Lumber/Hardware
8329 The Gas Company $130.18 Natural Gas
8330 General Electric Supply Company $136.38 Electric Pans
8331 GTE California $1,209.17 Telephone Services
8332 Gierllch-Mitchell,Inc. $9,434.25 Pump Pans
8333 Grafoplest $190.00 Instrument Supplies
8334 WW Grainger Inc. $1.486.29 Compressor Pads
8335 Great American Printing Co $938.66 Printing Services
0336 GLI International $750.15 Electric Pans
8337 GLl International $1,795.31 Electric Paris
8338 GST,Inc./Micro City $9,808.91 Office Supplies
8339 GTE $18,224.52 Telephone Services
8340 Harold Primnme Ice $128.00 Ice For Samples
8341 Harrington Indestrial Plastics $58.72 Plumbing Suppllos
8342 Hatch&Kirk Inc. $3.626.68 Truck Pads
8343 Hawaii Water Environment Assoc, $90.00 Conference Registration
8344 Hewlett-Packard $346.96 Service Agreement
8345 Hoemiger Service Inc. $481.84 Compressor Pans
8346 Hoffman An B Filtration $267.71 Mechanical Supplies
8347 Holmes B Narver Inc $601.64 Englneering Services
Suit Home Depot $379.59 Small Hardware
8349 Hub Auto Supply $738.33 Truck Pans
8350 City of Huntington Beach $13,418.11 Water Use
8351 Hunts Final Phase $6.300.00 Construction Services
8352 HI Standard Aulomothm $505.81 Truck Pads
8353 Imaging Plus,Inc. $0.216.23 Office Supplies
8354 Industrial Filter Manufacturer $3,078.16 Fillers
8355 Industrial Hearing B Pulmonary $150.00 Audiometric B Pulmonary Testing Of Employees
8356 Interstate Battery Systems $3.272.47 Batteries
8357 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $3.64 Water Use
8358 IPCO Safety-Ca $451.62 Safety Supplies
8359 J.D.Edwards World Solutions $24.048.65 Software License Fees MO 7.24-96
8360 J.P. Nissan Co $61.36 Office Supplies
8361 Jamison Engineedng,Inc. $1,400.00 Construction Services
8362 Jaya Catering $877.93 Directors Meeting Expense
8363 Johnstone Supply $779.28 Electric Parts
8364 Keiser Foundation Health Plan $22,328.40 Medical Insurance Premium
8365 Kleinfelder,Inc. $1,175.00 Geolechnlcal Consulting Services
8366 Knowledge Paint $1,782.76 Software
8367 Knox Industrial Supplies $2.089.34 Tools
8358 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company $1,693.31 Cellular Telephone Service
8369 Lord Fleming Architects,Inc. $3,034.87 Architectural Services
8370 Maintenance Products,Inc. $8,770.45 Mechanical Supplies
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 12/10/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8371 Manley's Boller Repair Company $833.28 Boiler Repair
8372 Mar Vac Electronics 9168.79 Instrument Supplies
8373 Mission Uniform Service $3.805.46 Uniform Rentals
8374 Mobile Modular Management Corp $344.80 Grim Taller Lease
8375 MoloPhoto $13.16 Photographic Services
8376 MPS Photographic Services,Inc. 631.80 Photographic Services
8377 National Mlerecomp Services $1.585.00 Maintenance Agreement
8378 Orange County Employment Management 8120.00 Membership
8379 Orange County Wholesale Electric 51,834.14 Instrument Supplies
8380 Orres Co. $1,656.85 Pump Parts
8381 Oxygen Service Company $925.83 Specialty Gases
8382 Ol Analytical $207.35 Lob Supplies
8383 Pacific Bell $1,247.58 Telephone Services
83M Pacific Mechanical Supply $8.748.91 Plumbing Supplies
8385 Pacific Paris and Controls,Inc. $534.41 Imhument Supplies
8386 Pacific Publishers $252.28 Publications
8387 Padre Janitorial Supplies $500.71 Janitorial Supplies
8388 Pagenet $708.88 Rental Equipment
8389 Parker Hannifin Corporation $429.35 Lubricator
8390 Peak Technologies 6382.50 Office Supplies
8391 The Perkin Eener Corp. 5800.00 Computer Paris
8392 Permeseel $1,368.64 Luba Oil
B393 Power Design s1,g62.60 Ektlrical Repairs
83N Presidium Inc $2.083.33 Workers Comp Claims Administrator.
8395 Pryor Resources,Inc. $149.00 Seminar Registration
83% Pulsaleeder,Inc. $416.90 Pump Parts
0397 Rabco $1,024.00 Search Light
8398 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $2,160.05 Trash Removal
8399 ReaBlme Systems Corporation 6500.00 Consulting Services
moo Red Wng Shoes $122.40 RaMbuaable Safer Shoes
Mot Remedy 58,628.36 Temporary Employment Servkres
8402 Rulan 8 Tucker Attorneys At Law $2.405.62 Legal Services
8403 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 3444.44 Metal
M04 RPM Electric Motors $4.202.25 Electric Motor Parts
B405 Scbwing America,Inc. $166.53 Pump Parts
6406 Scisorek 8 Son Flavors,Inc. $921.98 Refund Credit Balance
9407 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $1,557.98 Specialty Gases
moo Scoff,Reilly 8 Whitehead $51.70 Legal Services-Personnel Issues
8409 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. $3,774.94 Lob Repairs
8410 Self Insurance Plans $583.37 User Funding Assessment-Workers Comp
8411 Sequoia Than,Service $2,925.00 Groundskeeping
9412 Smith-Emery Company $21.192.50 Soil Testing M07-13-94
8413 Society for Human Resource Management $160.00 Membership
8414 Soil B Plant Laboratory,Inc. $333.00 Soil Testing
8415 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $15720 Pemrit Fees
8416 South Coast Water $135.00 Lab Supplies
6417 Southern California Marine Institute $966.00 Rental Equlporent
U18 Sparklers 52,168.99 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
8419 Sprint $29.10 Telephone Services
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Pak 12H0/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8420 Starting Ad $20.33 Art Supplies
8421 Summit Steel $2,435.62 Metal
8422 Sunset Ford $323.56 Truck Pads
8423 Sunset Industrial Parts $78.72 Mechanical Parts
8424 Supelco Inc $646.65 Lab Supplies
U25 By Nielson Service,Inc. $720.00 Equipment Maintenance
6426 The Register $3,479.00 Noises 8 Ads
8427 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $991.08 Mechanical Pads
8428 Tony Demerit Electric $680.00 Equipment Repair
8429 Aerofund FinanclaVTop Hal Pro $271.95 Director's Meeting Expense
8430 Tomell8 Cotten $745.50 Legal Services
U31 Tmemner Inc., $765.84 Calibration
8432 Truck 8 Auto Supply,Inc. $555.02 Truck Parts
M33 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $362.00 Lab Services
04M Tustin Dodge $101.09 Truck Pads
8435 United Financial Casualty Co. $785.98 Claim Settlement
6436 United Parcel Service $26.89 Parcel Services
6437 Valco Instruments Co.Inc $496.90 Lab Supplies
8438 Valley Chloe Supply Company $442.24 Plumbing Supplles
U39 Verde's Plumbing $40.00 Plumbing Services
8440 Vertex Business Systems $2,210.00 Office Furniture
M41 Vision Service Plan-(CA) $7,732.20 Vision Service Plan Premium
8442 VWR SGentific Products $795.38 Lab Supplies
8443 The Wackenhut Corporation $9.139.99 Contract Service-Security Guards
8444 Water Education Foundation $10.66 Map
8445 Weather and Wind Instrument Cc $475.03 Wind Socks
8446 Wasce Distribution Inc. $13.71 Instrument Supplies
8447 Western Slates Chemical Inc. $24.295.18 Caustic Soda MO 8.23-95
8448 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $1,940.00 Professional Services
8449 Xerox Corporation $2.574.77 Copler Leases
8450 Daniel R.Cardona $2.392.21 Employee Computer Loan Program
8451 Me&A.Esquer $1,730.14 Conference Expense Reims.
8452 Michelle R.Hetherington $172.32 Seminar Expense Relmb.
M53 Petty A.Steowes $110.50 Training Expanse Relmb.
0454 Edward M.Tones $246.11 Training Expense Relmb.
8455 Yu-U Teal $755.05 Conference Expense Relmb.
8456 Antonio S.Velenzuela $600.08 Conference Expanse Relmb.
8457 Nancy J.Wheatley $693.55 Seminar Expense Relmb.
8458 YTG International Inc.B Darrell Ennis $1,793.06 Employee Computer loan Program
8459 County of Orange $1,035.00 AdministraWe Face
8460 County Sanitation District of OC $1,406.27 Petty Cash Reims.
8461 Donald C.Harchar $2.221.70 Employee Computer Loan Program
8462 Nylon Computer S Dean Yekoyama $1,957193 Employee Computer Loan Program
8463 Chad"E.Reed $1,375.10 Employee Computer Loan Program
8464 Labware Inc. $39,750.00 Consulting Services MO 2-26-97
B465 Met.Health Acct Financial $117.903.74 Metre Premium
8466 Associated Ready Mixed Concrete $563.26 Concrete
8467 Chrome Crankshaft Co. $460.00 Mechanical Parts
8468 GTE California $952.29 Telephone Services
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 12/10/97
Check No, Vendor Amount Description
8469 Kemenn Paclflc.Inc. $2,291.94 panic Chloride MO 9-27-95
8470 Mar Vac Electronics $63.07 Instrument Supplies
8471 McMaster-Can Supply Co. $72.59 Tools
8472 Mobile Modular Management Corp $258.60 Office Trailer Lease
8473 Mina Safety Appliances Company $1,768.35 instrument Supplies
8474 New Horizons Computer Leaming $1,000.00 On-Site Training
8475 Norcal Controls Incorporated $936.28 Instrument Parts
8476 Potypura,Inc.Wor Polydyne $1,124.39 Cationic Polymer M03.11-92
8477 Valley Cities Supply Company $1,594.27 Plumbing Supplies
U78 Xerox Corporation $1,224.68 Copier Leases
8479 Mark A.Esquer $266.86 Meeting Expense Reimb.
11480 Michael J.MCCusker 5263.94 Meeting Expense Reimb.
8481 ACI Computer 6 Steve Kozak $1,800.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
M82 Compterpress 8 Roy Handy $1,727.10 Employee Computer Loan Program
9463 County Sanitation Districts;of OC $19,067.84 Workers Comp Relmb.
8484 Dean M.Fisher 52,795.45 Employee Computer Loan Program
8485 Xerox Corporation $88.98 Copier Lasses
Total Claims Paid 1211097 $2,103,973.15
Summary Amount
District No.2 $7,651.72
District No.3 $525.90
District No.5 $11,245.91
District No.6 $17.01
CORP $349,086.06
Self Insurance Fund. $23,932.49
Joint Operations $1,711,503.45
$2.703.973.15
s -
County Sensation dames Of Orange County
Claims Paid 12124/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
85N Advance Construction Inc U110,549.70 Construction J-34-1,P2-3&5
8505 Delta Dental $38,275.82 Dental Insurance Plan
8506 J.D.Edwards World Solutions $67,376.00 Software Cleanse Fees MO7-24-98
8507 Kemnon Pacific,Inc. $92,410.75 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95
8508 Margate Construction Inc. $756.230.53 Construction P1-36.2
8509 Nickey Petroleum Co Inc. $42.398.38 Lubricants/Diesel Fuel
8510 Orange County Water District $45.369.60 GAP Water Use MO 10.23-96
8511 Pima Gro Systems Inc $100,402.02 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95
8512 Power Systems Testing Company $81.000.00 Diesel Engines MO 2-28-96
8513 Science Applications Intl.,Go. $107,461.74 Ocean Monitoring MO 6S44
8514 Sonic Systems,Inc. $43,078.45 Computer Pads
0515 Southern California Edison $46.836.07 Power
8516 Sverdrup Civil,Inc $287,736.53 Construction P2-35-3,P7-38-5.P246,P2-55
8517 Thomas Bros.Maps $38,089.63 Printing
8518 Tula RanchlMagan Farms $42.309.88 Residuals Removal
8519 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $78,121.01 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No,C-044
8520 Amedcan Telephone&Telegraph $20.78 Long Distance Telephone Services
8521 American Telephone&Telegraph $4.93 Long Distance Telephone Services
5522 A-Plus Systems $450.75 Nations&Ads
8523 Action Awnings Inc. $2.400.00 Awnings
6524 Air Conditioning Specialties $82.84 Aerosol Adhesive
8525 Air Products and Chemicals,Inc. $13.02 Lab Supplies
8526 Allied Packing&Rubber Inc 534.73 Mechanical Supplies
8527 Almabon Electronics $389.54 Usage Fee Refund
8528 American Digital Technologies $542.61 On-She Training
8529 American Management Association $8,400.00 Seminar Registrations
8530 Anaheim Motel $390.25 Usage Fee Refund
8531 Analysts,Inc. $825.00 Testing Kits
8532 Andrews Glass Co. $1,522.30 Lab Supplies
8533 Anthony Peet Control,Inc. $610.00 Service Agreement
8534 Appleone Employment Service $945.30 Temporary Employment Services
6535 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting 5235.00 Lab Supplies
8536 Arizona instrument $421.30 Instrument Supplies
8537 Jeffrey L.Armstrong $1,055.45 Meeting Expense Reimb.
8538 Arys Disposal Service,Inc. $310.40 Toxic Waste Removal
8539 Asbury Environmental Services $35.00 Waste Oil Removal
8540 Author D.Guy III $1,910.00 Professional Services
8541 Assoc of Metro.Sewerage Agencies 5950.00 Conference Registration
8542 ASR Analysis $500.00 Lab Services
8543 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $462.85 Telephone Installation
8544 Basler Electric Company $4,530.07 Electric Parts
8545 Battery Specialties $206.36 Batteries
8546 Been Consulting $2.441.56 Mechanical Supplies
8547 Bait Delivery $107.00 Freight
8548 Bolt Tech $123.50 Freight
8549 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $3,086.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94
8550 Bush&Associates Inc. $520.00 Surveying Services MO6-2&97
8551 BNI Building News $124.78 Publication
8552 Cal-Tax $96.00 Subscription
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 12/24/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
0553 California Automatic Gate $87.16 Service Agreement
85M Callan Associates, Ina $3.550.00 Invesbnent Advisor
6555 Carol,Ina $1.018.85 Hardware
8556 Camali Corp. $2,387.50 Service Agreement
8557 Came Corporation $150.89 Fiber Optic Cable
8558 Capitol Enquiry,Inc. $22.95 Publication
8559 Camillo Engineers $5.786.39 Engineering Services J-39
8560 Chapman Counseling $640.00 Employee Training
8561 Connell GM Pans $51.82 Truck Pans
8562 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $3,762.21 Electric Pens
8563 ConlinenlaWelaughlin $4.88 Tools
8564 Commse Consultants $648.00 Consulting Services MO 8-11.93
8565 Cooper Cameron Corporation $4,360.02 Engine Pans
85M Coral Magazice $39.95 Technical Journal
8567 Corporate Express $437.35 Office Supplies
8568 County of Orange $525.00 Permit Fees
8569 County of Orange $2.955.00 Administrative Fees
8570 County of Orange $1,580.00 Administrative Fees
8571 CASA $525,00 Conference Registration
8572 CCI Technologies $1.696.00 Cable Installation
8573 CCI Technologies $5.294.00 Cable Installation
8574 CMS,Inc. $2,172.02 Professional Services
8575 CPEE $795.00 Training Registration
8576 CPI-The Alternative Supplier $695.00 Lab Supplies
85T7 CS Company $1.06.91 Plumbing Supplies
8578 D&E Supply $425.63 Plumbing Supplies
8579 Daniels ire Service $683.14 Truck Tres
8580 Datavault $204.00 Offane Back-
up Tape Stooge
8581 David E.Libe11,Ph.D. $1,500.00 Management Training
8682 Day-Tmers,Inc. $32.85 Office Supplies
$663 Del Mar Ans"cal $1,120.00 Biosolids Analysis
8584 Dept.of Civil&Emimnmanl Eng. $1.000.00 Membership
8585 Digital Equipment Corporation $1,222.97 Office Equipment
8586 Eastern Electric $6.69526 Equipment Repair
8587 Edison Co. $5,695.37 Power
8588 Egan Visual Inc. $129.30 Office Supplies
8589 Etex Inc. $258.85 Valve
8590 Evemas $700.00 Maintenance Agreement
8591 Fxperian $117.92 Orange County Property Information
8592 ESP Industries $161.54 Mechanical Supplies
8593 Federal Express $359.50 Air Freight
8594 Fitter Supply Company $741.80 Filters
8595 Fine Science Tools,Inc $205.07 Tools
SSW Fisher Scientific S2,3N.84 Lab Supplies
8597 Flat and Vertical,Inc. $114.00 Concrete Cutting
0598 Fountain Valley Camera $116.95 Photo Supplies
8599 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $107.75 Paint Supplies
3600 Frys Electronics $1,517.72 Electronic&Computer Supplies
8601 Fst Sand and Gravel,Inc. $157.B0 Road Base Materials
c
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 12/24/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8602 Gemak-Callahan Company $3,439.38 Chemicals
8603 Gary Young $2.640.00 Lab Services
8604 The Gas Company $20.260.26 Natural Gas
8605 Gates Fiberglass Installers $17.699.00 Air Duds
8606 General Binding Corporation $290.68 Office Machine Repairs
8607 _General Electric Company $2.615.00 Electric Parts
6608 General Electric Supply Company $5.792.64 Electric Parts
8609 GTE California $776.84 Telephone Services
8610 Getings Castle $1,494.15 Pump Pads
8611 Gledich-Mitchell,Inc. $495.43 Pump Pads
8612 Global Knowledge Network $5.300.00 Training Registration
8613 Government Institutes Inc, $678.00 Publication
8614 WW Grainger Inc. $383.03 Compressor Pads
8615 Graybar Electric Company $455.79 Computer Hardware
8616 Great American Printing Co. $5,010.33 Printing
8617 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $449.42 Janitorial Supplies
8618 GLI International $2.645.96 Equipment Repair
8619 GMF Sound,Inc. $186.53 Electric Pads
8620 CST,Inc./Micro City $516.58 Office Supplies
8621 GTE Communications System $1,239.43 Internet Connection Service
8622 Harker Equipment Company $1,170.89 Truck Pads
8623 Harold Primrose Ice $48.00 Its For Samples
8624 Harper B Co. $133.85 Excellence Awards
8625 Heulaway Storage Containers $2,928.00 Container Rentals
8626 HIM Inc $1,900.24 Tools
8627 Hoerliger Service Inc $564.97 Compressor Pads
8628 Home Depot $532.64 Small Hardware
B629 Houghton International Inc. $379.74 Usage Fee Refund
8530 Hub Auto Supply $49.42 Truck Pads
8631 Hughes Alecraft Company $4,1D4.44 Usage Fee Refund
8632 HACH Company $117.90 Lab Supplies
8633 Industrial Threaded Products $431.75 Commodore
Slim Information Resources $200.00 Personnel Services
8635 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $128.20 Lab Supplies
8636 Interstate Bakery Systems $635.19 Bakeries
8637 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $134.D2 Water Use
8638 IBM Corporation-Way $324.00 Service Contract
8639 IDM Controls Inc $646.62 Equipment Repair
8640 IPCO Safety•Ca $63.62 Safety Supplies
8641 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $2.161.47 Instrument Supplies
8642 James A.Ubedo $209.79 Usage Fee Refund
8643 Jamison Engineering, Inc $1,695.00 Equipment Rental
8644 Janice E.Mcdolly,MFCC $760.00 Professional Services
8645 Jay's Catering $692.92 Directors'Meeting Expense
8646 Johnstone Supply $1,522.89 Electric Pads
8647 Knox Industrial Supplies $6,793.43 Tools
8648 Kona Kai Mobile Home Park $2.491.50 Usage Fee Refund
8649 KT Laundromat $270.33 Usage Fee Refund
8650 Lab Safety Supply.de. $2,021.55 Safely Supplies
County Sanitation Districts a Orange County
Claims Paid 12/24197
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
$651 Lab Support $5.431.32 Temporary Employment Services
8652 Labebonu $5,578.59 Computer Hardware
8653 League Of Ca Cities $3000 Meeting Registration
$654 League Of Celifomia Cities $3D.00 Meeting Registration
6655 Luces Western,Inc. $730.48 Usage Fee Refund
8656 Lustre-Cal $598.93 Safety Supplies
8657 LIMS/Letter $99.DD Subscription
8658 M.E.Sibermann Co. $16,957.T7 Sewer Repair
8659 M.E.Silbennann Co. $4,711.50 Sewer Repair
8660 M.E.SIlbermann Co. $11.876.71 Sewer Repair
8661 Magic Solutions $175.88 Publications
8662 Maintenance Technology Corp. $858.67 Mechanical Parts
8663 Mar Vac Electronics $76.11 Instrument Supplies
8664 Mark Optics,Inc. $782.84 Usage Fee Refund
6665 Marriott Rancho Las Palmas Resort $145.20 Conference Registration
8666 Mc Junkin Corp $4,406.87 Plumbing Supplies
8657 McKenna Engineering B Equipment $918.62 Pump Parts
8668 Medlin Controls Co. $55.27 Instrument Supplies
6669 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co $9,190.79 Mechanical Regain
8670 chi. $57.75 Electric Parts
8671 Minnesota Western $20578 tab Supplies
8672 Minority Progress $698.00 Notices B Ads
8673 Mission Abrasive Supplies $13.80 Safety Supplies
8674 Mission Uniform Service $3.379.55 Uniform Rentals
8675 Mobile Modular Management Corp $603.40 Office Trailer Lease
8676 Motion Industries $165.18 Pump Parts
8677 MotcPhote $24.20 Photographic Services
8678 Mufti W Systems,Inc. $1,352.92 Pump Parts
9679 MPS Photographic Services $695.58 Photographic Services
8680 MPS Photographic Services $166.50 Photographic Services
8681 Nasco $1.171.00 Lab Supplies
8682 National Micrommp Services $1,6B5.00 Maintenance Agreement
8683 New Horizons Computer Leammg $2.396.00 OnSde Training
8684 Newport Center Medical $251.87 Usage Fee Refund
8685 Newport Center Medical $765.65 Usage Fee Refund
8686 Newport Harbor Yacht Club $172.82 Usage Fee Refund
9687 Ocean Products Research Inc. $112.57 Lab Supplies
8688 Office Depot Business Services $1.621.86 Office Supplies
W89 Orange County Business Council $25.00 Workshop Registration
8690 Orange County Pump Co. $912.52 Pump Pads
8691 Orange County Red Cross $44.00 Safety Training
8692 Orange County Wholesale Electric $627.40 Instrument Supplies
8693 Orange Valve B Filling Company $630.77 Fittings
8694 Oxygen Service Company $177.55 Specialty Gases
8695 Pacific Bell $146.95 Telephone Services
8696 Pacific Bell Internet Services $6,203.00 Internet Services
8697 Pacific Mechanical Supply $18,763.38 Plumbing Supplies
8698 Pacific Parts and Controls,Inc. $10,309.76 Instrument Supplies
9699 Padre Janitorial Supplies $437.31 Janitorial Supplies
,d
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 1224/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
$700 Pads Unlimited $61.82 Truck Parts
8701 Pascal&Ludwig,Inc. $19.440.00 Construction J-33-2
8702 Plegel Oil Company $332.32 Usage Fee Refund
8703 Polypure,Ina&ror Polydyne,Inc. $17.102.36 Cationic Polymer M03.11-92
8704 Premier Fastener Company $390.16 Tools
8705 Pryor Resources,Inc. $298.00 Training Registration
8706 Pulsafeeder,Inc $679.33 Pump Pads
8707 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. $298.13 Equipment Repair
8708 R W Beck $23,058.72 Professional Services M0 7-30-97
8709 Ralow $1,11i Electric Parts
8710 Rip Von Winkle $401.82 Usage Fee Refund
8711 Fallen&Tucker Alomeys Al Law $2,339.73 Legal Services
8712 Rylech,Inc. $14,620.00 Professional Services
8713 RJN Group,Inc. $23.036.25 CMS Consulting Services
$714 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. $776.75 Paint Supplies
8715 S&J Chevrolet Allison Transmisson $2.953.89 Truck Repairs
8716 Sancon Engineering,Inc. $8,901.00 Engineering Services
8717 Scientific Spray Flushes $176.74 Usage Fee Refund
8718 Serpadix Corporation $3,166.61 Small Hardware
8719 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $36.11 Tools
8720 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $782.69 Tools/Hardware
8721 Siemon,Larsen&Marsh $8.000.00 Professional Services
8722 SkillPath Seminars $3,995,00 On-Site Training
8723 Sourcecom $86.57 Publication
8724 South Coast Air Ouality Mgmt. $10.00 Permit Fees
8725 South Coast Water $45.00 Lab Supplies
8726 Southern CalBomia Gas Company $21,000.00 Natural Gas
8727 Southern California Marine Institute $965.00 Rental Equipment
8726 Standard Supply&Equipment Co $116.40 Pump Part
5729 Stale Chemical Mfg.Co. $384.68 Janitorial Supplies
6730 SlateNet $165.00 Seminar Registration
8731 Strata International,Inc. $957.61 Chemicals
8732 Systems Bic Industries,Inc. $5.974.53 Usage Fee Refund
8733 SWRCB Accounting Office $400.00 Annual Fee
87M Thomas M.Gewes,P.E. $7,820.00 Professional Services
8735 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $195.91 Mechanical Pads
8736 The Training Clinic $1,165.00 Workshop Registration
8737 Triple A Containers $334.85 Usage Fee Refund
8738 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $917.25 Truck Pads
8739 Michelle Tuchman $61.10 Telephone Expense Relmb.
8740 Two Roads Professional Resource $3.400.00 Consulting Serum&
8741 TRW Space and Electronics Group $388.00 Equipment Codification
8742 The Uniseurcs Corporation $523.87 Office Supplies
8743 United Financial Casualty Co. $5,325.20 "Check Was Voided-
8744 United Parcel Service $692A3 Parcel Services
8745 US FIBer/Polymetrics,Inc. $1,262.75 Lab Supplies
8746 Valley Gilles Supply Company $5,566.51 Plumbing Supplies
8747 Varied $263.55 Lab Supplies
8748 Veme's Plumbing $40.00 Plumbing Services
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid IM4/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8749 TW Comcorp.Communications Supplies $916.09 Instrument Supplies
B750 Vision Service Plan-(CA) $7,776.30 Vision Service Premium
8751 VWR Scenlific Products $9.873.81 Lab Supplies
8752 The Wackenhut corporation $5,845.01 Contract Service-Security Guards
8753 Waste Markets $18.199.99 Residuals Removal MO 3.27-96
8754 Weslem Stales Chemical Inc. $6.985.68 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
8755 Nancy J.Wheatley $151.50 Meeting Expense Reimb.
8756 Wdeg Scientific $670.67 Lab Supplies
8757 Blake Anderson $523.73 Meeting Expense Reimb.
8758 Donald F.McIntyre $1.801.91 Meeting Expense Reimb.
8759 Robed Oolen $2,114.44 Meeting Expense Reimb.
8760 County Sanitation District of OC $942.11 Petty Cash Reimb.
8761 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $3,020.89 Telephone Installation
8762 California Emrironmental Controls,Inc. $24.60 Pump Parts
8763 Conam MMP Inspection Inc $923.20 Inspection Servlcas
87" Santa Fe Bag Co.,Inc, $7.642.60 Send Bags
Total Claims Paid 12/24/97 $2,710.016.26
Summary Amount
District No.1 $4,043.62
Gould No.2 $8,27C62
Dlstrid No.3 $5.346151
District No.5 $1.190.34
CORF $1,551,949]1
Safi Insurance Fonda $5,277.22
Joint Operations $1,133,934.24
$2,710.016.26
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Mretl g Date
02 25/98
AGENDA REPORT Rem�Jumtler
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California �r
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Prepared by: Lynda Heller, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: UNIFORM AND JANITORIAL ARTICLES RENTAL SERVICE
SPECIFICATION NO. R-045
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 2) authorize award of a
purchase order contract for Specification No. R-045, Uniform and Janitorial Articles
Rental Service, to Mission Linen and Uniform Service for providing rental uniforms and
various janitorial articles rental service, at an estimated annual amount of$108,366.44
SUMMARY
Sealed bids were received on January 27, 1998, for providing rental uniforms to
designated employees, and various janitorial articles as listed on the bid tabulation. The
uniforms consist of work type styles in combination polyester/cotton, and cotton only.
The contract period for the rental service of uniforms and janitorial articles is three (3)
years with an option to renew the contract for one (1) two-year period.
Staff recommends that a purchase order contract be awarded for a three (3) year
contract beginning May 1, 1998, through April 30, 2001, with the option to renew the
contract for one (1)two-year period, to Mission Linen and Uniform Service, the lowest
responsive bidder, at their proposed unit price, estimated at an annual amount of
$108,366.44, based on usage.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Bid Tabulation
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Various, account#50610)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
,tidoneaut,»n.dONn2w IDSRMAir dw
Rm. 10f97 Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
ALTERNATIVES
Five sealed bids were received on January 27, 1998, for providing rental uniform and
various janitorial articles rental service. One of the bids was incomplete and determined
to be non-responsive. Of the five bids submitted, three were higher than the lowest bid
submitted by Mission Linen and Uniform Service, and therefore considered not cost
effective. Staff recommends award of a purchase order contract to Mission Linen and
Uniform Service, the lowest responsive bidder.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Bid Tabulation Memorandum
GGS/MD:Ifh
\VaEmWlst\WAIaNnp]PBIDSNMS4R Eoc
w w: Page 2
e
a
February 2, 1998
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gary G. Streed
Director of Finance
FROM: Marc D. Dubois
Contracts/Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: Uniform and Janitorial Articles Rental Services
Specification No. R-045
Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday, January 27, 1998, for Uniform and Janitorial Articles
Rental Services, Specification No. R-045. The table below details the bid tabulation.
MISSION UNIFIRST PRUDENTIAL ARAMARK L 8 N
Executive Pant 212.62 141.75 198.45 283.50 170.10
Executive Shirt 141.75 127.57 155.92 172.93 155.92
Work Pant 343AO 515.10 515.10 1184.73 515.10
Work Shirt 343.40 472.17 489.34 867.08 No-Bid
Ladies Pant. Poly 50 19.50 25.00 17.00 34.50 No-Bid
Ladies Blouse 150 19.50 22.50 15.50 23.00 30.00
coverall, Cotton 50 40.00 37.50 57.50 109.00 65.00
Coverall, Po 100 80.00 65.00 65.00 102.00 90.00
Shop Rag 7500 307.50 375.00 375.D0 450.D0 375.00
Bath Towel 500 135.00 125.D0 140.D0 85.00 200.00
Glass Towel 25 3.10 2.50 3.00 325 4.25
Door Mat,3 x 4 125 193.75 250.00 262.50 270.00 237.50
Door Mat,3 x 10 10 31.90 50.00 42.00 54.00 35.00
Dust Mop,22 80 62.40 48.00 48.00 88.00 64.00
Dust Mop.36' 25 22.00 22.50 20.00 40.50 30.00
Lab Coat 48.00 36.00 75.00 40.80 48.00
Subtotal(weekly) 2003.82 2315.59 2479.31 3808.29 Non-Responsive
Environmental Charge BD.15 46.31 0 0
VU.,otal 2083.97 2361.90 2479.31 3808.29
ted Annual Amount $105,365.44 1 $122.818.80 128,924.12 $198,031.10
Staff recommends the award of a purchase order contract to Mission Linen and Uniform
Services, with the lowest cost for providing Uniform and Janitorial Articles Rental Services, for a
three-year period beginning May 1, 1998, with provisions for one (2) two-year extension. The
estimated annual cost is $108,366.44.
M rc D. Dubois
o Tacts/Pu ie l Manager
7 Q
G. St ed
Director of Finance
V r donldawl\wp.dwtnT30rBIDS R045BIDTAB.dm
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meebng Date To I"
az zs14
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Re�JVumber
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California UU
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance o —
''L
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager MI
SUBJECT: RECEIPT OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT: LARAINE PIPOLY v.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Personal Injury/Negligence,
Laraine Pipoly v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County
Superior Court Case No. 790053, and refer the matter to General Counsel for
defense of the interests of the Districts.
SUMMARY
The Summons and Complaint was received by the Districts on February 6, 1998,
and is related to a multi-vehicle accident on June 19, 1997, involving a Districts'
vehicle. Please refer to the attached February 11, 1998, memo from General
Counsel.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
None.
1VwQNaOINIVbEW.penN pall RerybVdnl&uNJC ]W]St.Ez
R—. ,� Page 1
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. General Counsel Memo
SKIc
\V..PyblY.pkNMR.4.WI ReV UsiR&erW`Csel6m90x
R....a 1� Page 2
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MeedngDate To ads.
oyes/9s
AGENDA REPORT Item Number ItTumber
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Bill Brooks, Engineer
SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO NEWHOPE— PLACENTIA TRUNK SEWER
FOR 1-5 FREEWAY WIDENING, CONTRACT NO. 2-3A
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve Utility Agreement No. 12257 with Caltrans for reimbursement of
design management, construction management, inspection and associated
District costs for modifications to Newhope-Placentia Trunk Sewer for
1-5 widening, Contract No. 2-3A.
SUMMARY
The State of California, acting through the Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) is responsible for the 1-5 widening project which requires relocation
and protection of County Sanitation District No. 2 (CSD2) facilities. Segment A-2
of the 1-5 widening consists of freeway improvements from Chapman Avenue in
the cities of Anaheim and Orange to 0.4 miles north of Hester Street in the City of
Anaheim. The CSD2 facilities within segment A-2 are the Newhope-Placentia
39-inch trunk sewer and associated manholes. The existing facilities are lawfully
maintained in their present location and qualify for protection and relocation at
the State's expense under the provisions of Section 703 of the Streets and
Highways Code.
The design for the concrete easement of 300 linear feet of the Newhope-
Placentia Trunk Sewer and adjustment of four(4) manholes to grade has been
incorporated into the State's segment A-2 construction plans. CSD2 will provide
construction inspection and construction management to ensure work is
completed in conformance to District's standards.
CSD2 can invoice the State under conditions of the Utility Agreement. Progress
payments and final bill will be processed by the State within 90 days after receipt
of the CSD2 invoice. Detailed records for billings must be compiled and retained
by CSD2 for a period of four (4) years and must be available to State under
conditions of the utility agreement.
ma•aa.m+a,o�•�v m Dar,e•pon.uam ewrmx.an is iree.•r aoo
a^oe° O1S9B Page 1
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Utility Agreement No. 12257 provides for District reimbursement of$90,000,
This is sufficient to cover budgeted costs for design management, construction
management and inspection.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: District 2 Cl/Reliability Item No. 5)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
All District's costs for design management, construction management and
inspection will be reimbursed by Caltrans.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no alternatives to this project since it is required as a result of the 1-5
widening.
CEOA FINDINGS
By State of California, Department of Transportation.
ATTACHMENTS
11baC98181 NlgMefJgwE6 P ell Reba V MI BOBN513dN 45 hMveY Mc
Renae� 1tiv9B Page 2
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To It Btla.oz/zsiee
AGENDA REPORT Item Number �rempumber
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California /�C
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Bill Brooks, Engineer
SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO MAGNOLIA RELIEF SEWER IN WESTERN
AVENUE AT THE FULLERTON CREEK CHANNEL CROSSING,
CONTRACT NO. 3-9-1
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve agreement D97-128 with Orange County Flood Control District
(OCFCD) for cost of construction, administration and inspection for
modifications to Magnolia Relief Sewer in Western Avenue at the Fullerton
Creek Channel Crossing, Contract No. 3-9-1.
SUMMARY
On August 4, 1997, the OCFCD sent a "Prepare to Relocate" notice and
corresponding plans for the Fullerton Channel Flood Control Improvements
project. This OCFCD contract will widen and deepen the Fullerton Creek
Channel that crosses underneath many streets in the cities of Fullerton and
Buena Park. The Magnolia Relief Sewer, Contract No. 3-9, is affected by the
OCFCD improvements in the section of the channel that crosses Western
Avenue north of Melrose Avenue and south of 11� Street in Buena Park.
OCFCD has prior rights that are superior to those of County Sanitation District
No. 3 (CSD3). Therefore, CSD3 must pay for any changes to the sewer to
accommodate the OCFCD improvements. Those changes will allow a smaller
cross section of the sewer to be replaced such that the top of the new section of
sewer does not conflict with the bottom of the newly improved flood control
channel. OCFCD will allow CSD3 to include a new design for the affected
section of sewer in the OCFCD construction contract if there is a reimbursement
agreement in place for CSD3 to reimburse OCFCD for the cost of the sewer
improvements.
Staff has estimated that the construction costs for the necessary sewer
improvements will be $109,000. The proposed reimbursement agreement
provides a deposit of$109,000 by CSD3. The final costs paid by CSD3 to
OCFCD will be the sum of the actual cost of constructing the sewer
improvements plus 15% for administration and inspection by OCFCD. The total
project costs, including design, construction, construction support, administration
G:�MA R�W N aaadM1141073M E
Rn move Page 1
and overhead is $194,850. Staff recommends approval of the agreement with
OCFCD.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached "Budget Information Table".
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
There are sufficient funds ($40,000) for this fiscal year from District No. 3 Capital
Improvement Projects reliability, Item 5 "Miscellaneous Projects".
Approximately $154,850 will be budgeted in the 1998-1999 District No. 3 Capital
Improvement Projects for Contract No. 3-9-1.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost effective alternatives for this compliance project with OCFCD.
Sewer facilities must exist at this location to accommodate active laterals.
CEQA FINDINGS
The Orange County Flood Control District, as lead agency for the project, has
previously conducted and completed all environmental review required under
CEQA for this project and has adopted Negative Declaration, IP 97-003, dated
March 25, 1997.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
DAUBDB:jam
G NIpI00aMgertla Or.RagM.—,B..011.21. x
Re—d 1=W Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
MODIFICATIONS TO MAGNOLIA RELIEF SEWER IN WESTERN AVENUE
AT THE FULLERTON CREEK CHANNEL CROSSING
CONTRACT NO. 3-9-1
BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK (ADOPTED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO
CSD 3 CIP) TOTAL
DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED FUNDS DATE DATE(%)
STAFF (DESIGN) $ 28,500.00 $ 28,500.00 $ $ 28,500.00 $ 10,000.00 35%
CONSTRUCTION
(BY OCFCD) $ $ 109,000.00 $ 109,000.00 0%
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION
AND INSPECTION
(BY OCFCD) $ $ 11,500.00 $ 16,350.00 $ 16,350.00 0%
STAFF
(CONSTRUCTION
MGMT. 8
INSPECTION) $ 11,500.00 $ 29,500.00 $ 41,000.00 0%
TOTAL $ 40.000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 154,850.00 $ 194,850.00 $ 10,000.00 5%
H:Wp.dWeng`engZ-9d Wudget Into tablelAs 1/20/98
t
Meeting Dace Toh atls.
70INT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Dz12srga
AGENDA REPORT IDem Numb /er !! tube
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: EXECUTE QUITCLAIM SEWER EASEMENT TO SHEA
HOMES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Execute quitclaim of La Habra purchase line "W' to current property
developer, Shea Homes of Southern California, Inc.
SUMMARY
The Board of Directors of CSD No. 3 at its regular meeting on October 12, 1988
accepted a new grant of easement from Chevron USA, Inc. for sanitary sewer
purposes. This easement is along the west side of Beach Boulevard between
Imperial Highway to a point north of Rosecrans. The Board authorized execution
of a quitclaim deed to Chevron, quitclaiming the District's existing easement
through territory owned by Chevron.
The quitclaim deed was never recorded by Chevron therefore the current
property owner Shea Homes of Southern California, Inc. is requesting a quitclaim
of this easement to them.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
G:NIgbmMgmGa GnX ReryRsuant Roaren➢3 pu2laim 033`A0 Ern
RexwP v,ega Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Quitclaim Deed Exhibits "A" & "B"
CFW/RJR:jee
c wgae.�o Rmw nt eo =w�g'tree a:
a�.g ,naee Page 2
EXH/e/T 'Am
";P4- 91f• Lvf .
0[ylyJ���p,tr,w.Ltwr ,.may MJa Lf� K
a n �4f
"a _ 119
YWnY a. rq. • L\W. Yw cer aNN W L(.rn. M Y•wW YrYFY L .
rn. •w L i. aw\. ..irfw n.bbq.ry W OveW wYl.rm Y\L
ry FtW W.a:y olwL rT1 W vww L a4W. w rYYI W Ov.W OwL•i
.Y r•)W ivbty J. rq. 4.nh. IWFYY1t.Y M MYvlm Y Wq tout �
Y W Cx).t Y L W. v wY\w wwb•tr H\b Jw.q OYl(IYY• Y
M W ryrvw H i.IMWr eW YVYY N rwrN\fuY H 1�Y vY.W Y wo.
Y\ w vY.Iv.Y!:W. Ytv4 WY• IFIv[W MtnYr LLwW W YYxy.wwt
.tf(.1W Nv v\wvv.�wrYF W W\gYrP.\\Y q wY[Y nF rr H[Y v[Iv 1
'Jwr• rqu• J Y tr YY. ow.W Yr.\P. vY.N.IYe\YY we\fL Jv�
wY H Yv4 4vnw v b:.Y4 \Mfl '
l.\na rf WJ [vb\wv I41 Mr nY• WY way Irl M\ nY Y YY 4Y H v
w 1W. YfN N.Y.yY Y Wvvtw N bYw� '
xbN Y rY VY\) q W Ye,Yb ibY q 6yfwY. W v Yq\NIYy W
vYlYv N\ Y(fYW... YW Y Nnv YY 1W H rY dw\Mr pFN
IOI H WYv y. (vWGN J. JNW wq Y M. sLJ L•.. 4v4r.Ic.N.wl)
uwn\Y%m tN\ Yv' W � v W W!W\t.Ynv tJx1 a(wY
Yv\tY y. W rwbN \rw Y y O• ws tL•F rub Yrw.YY Y•Y•Yvf.
r.la My \ww +bY Oi• Y',trv\r Wm MI \wN •N4 Y• W Yvs W.A
.M\: tW.e ib\\y Or Ws W.ii Ms WNI MO Y•%` Yn• rnm M\I 1
- \L....wLL u•ss• Wf. YJ.% Mb owL MY d•er• Wt. W.% Fnl rw s
+W\lY y efi Mtv\ q LNrwbw NW YYW 4 rvN.Y YrY\:4 YW fNL
IW W WYru .YY q W W\Wve\YM.t�xlYf YN YYW y. .Wg4Y
Li]uw.. vN v Yu• ti\N!HYMN Mvt:ixl H Nf[Vntu 1L vWl
i vM.q YY nY\w I lit M\n4• YW Y•Y Ib M.qY�rY vw H e
.uY. Nov. .. uY t.LY. .:•.iw. mr\. . \r war HI
^.wY• 8YY .f YLfwY. a w\ PrM\tFY.4 Y N
YaWIY H v Yw 4 \ w.W LW H\Y YnwH Nw•.lixl .f Orgla
'4 twvvy L iNY. YY. 1 vrv\. i.FL L• WNN 4 N wW.Y iref.Uo:yLY
- • [tat tN w\pwvf r..r..1 W iwwq N.\•t qxl e(rtJ Yv\IN FI W
ry¢Y{ \Yw iYY Y• xt Fv\ M•ii Mrl \Yw. Y iG•%` W\• an.10[Nlt
f4.r W\L O• IJt Y4. lax.Yv Ms \W.YW C.•Mr Y.f• Ib(.M M\t :4.w
Y-tv Y` %• F.s q.% hnl Wa fYN 4•d` 3 s :rL[p Mq \vN•v Jatti e[
s L.1. nf.lO [e1\; \Yvr!q\!0•d• ws !%Jl M\t IWN Jid 0•y" ]uv.
Yt.91r '.NI Ww ]w\y` Or 4N• T\NJ M\I \bvry (YY L`•x` YW rr0:q WN
• .Y la`d• Yp• AIi.(0 rw w w
U.U. M.
1T W\. JT.aO FNI !Ww LJt' N YN. IDJL.% Mb tNY. !YY 0• .V•Yn. y1.Y Ms v.n b Yqr
\v• wtN nN [nv ib\\v YY t \Y JY\wvv tY v Itxl of ivn tY O•
,i4� s YYv Y W\. i.eJi.L. r\6 41b q fwwutY >nY YN.n 4 -
♦
lY wb o xl w41atY by vnN. Yt. •` :.v. 4 Y4fw ei Nv y MW.N
WLL v y YW Jd.vJ L. WY4Y rYr.lN+• Awbe. va �
vi Pnlw a!\N . m .vlYv r4iF)ytY b!f•Jw\Wn \rnY•a�1 oI Nli.
.rta n• .JN b W.aYi n\!ta :bi'a4 et\e.nYb�[•YTq\F YW.W awp
•. YJ F U LLq OYYR. 'lew wa YJ Ya.arw[H. N\s•
wv v YpW rW.. Y iYM1Y .W•w.bw 1M Yv.vbvY4 4.v v! . w tY.
y..tf Y. MF.Y .( YW N u w Y YNHw n!L W•N4N W .r y
jw. �ornw rw . w wtY N � ro.r r \ww Lr rY wrr.
�M\Y YMv H nrealY.wq r/Y\Mwfy e[Y Ffw N tb n\bY s.IIwW
.VY. ry\Yww.[f%NU4.vY YwPI ,
v YI w wa YN 1Y xP\ \J nN q\tL o 1.Y - o vW\Y wbY d Mfll
[wl'..MHD N .N n6 vY rtM.wq.vo.Y wpwr u \ • [wf iq o•
[rl .r . - 1 YYNrvN v nW wr.w W WNw W1NM• Y
b xfa'\ w`.v.• \Y b%W Yw.YN iW I(w4v NY Yvurvy \pN ILL Ya
IH Awbt. L0. L[YttY/. YY• •�
YW CY hn• �.
Y'Yf\Y dIr1 W
dvi%ONiOL rT.i
0
_ —•L L YaYf b vw [t IY var/w Co. —
OaNra 61rS•Y
Mo.WYY rqr
YYYO Mq bSd/i.
rN L YSW. j
iiipa MMY i/qr
SaM/ J. [Yq•
Y •f 411fe.d4 -..eU e! Yv
4 Un N YI .f }•+vYir YYr Y 1N M.. ]r[na o.trY)7Y YOr+
w. YrFl aN•W. v MNq]v4N :v ve.fai...nN 4+vU of Y/ L.Yq aMM
[f C/Ilhnlea m1nY t nlvr ..p.[Ylulun[Y n. Fn/Y3U[SF•n!
4tbilu ]. arq. • .1... 4Lo 4[\Onvu [N i.[a. Mrt. Yi Y/Y[•r 61FnY a., I
Y.m[qe rq vm W nN I..rcr. i[Y)a
beq N>Lr IhINeU Y\Y>v bql oa Mw C.Nrlvi Yi wum. rm WMa GW�
• v rT Ya avnU J. bq. vN nh. FnM+l)1N+• Y r Y N Oa FNp[/Yp/['
bY[ vn vMTup U W n\]Iv :Y\nwc4 W vf.nLNa N N N mr[YM/[I
eb Na. Y a1tY[[ Ibne!• ` bN bwY\O w+<)L•a v[[•M-44 1
]rcleln Fu `v• Y n :N.) 111 '1 1. 1.1. dvnglr.. Nt . enbv.
lanout aN 1: Ywwl Ywrv. L+.q FUY
Y na fer N iN.u.4utr. Mn Y YL[MY. 0[Y.Y[.Jy. p. Ifn. .
M•1n U.N. Oa.
4u1vtIN.f tb.++ fYurtY�.wY[Ur G.u/LL of tN Clq or N WaN. � '
NynY
}Y\ We-vv. tnn w+e Y•lnna N W Cf1) .f Y Yvn. F rneW L Ytq.
• LL. N nnYvt te'tb .unNv .f veWvtlY. rf.YY•b vY •I"—e w •d[[a
1W. • Nq r.aW[, Co..w.pY..f wrY •^n WM.r.1..a.Y Yr+I
NIv Fi/.Y .t YY so-1.1 1. Nla WUen. ra v]..• b.Y .vnM or YY NW
.n nYi1 Ym•Na I. h.1M. 1
• .rU .r L.. 1.r.—114, IN. .1Y. Y1Y ws M Mt nY ai YY Co. or
dltYn n to i.uoq If]n .1...,.NN Y un...... ...
rr. wn1n.Y![M
yue(W N.Mn pwr1N•
Ytll .r-.11.U. T.M.0 i an... Y.[. J3 r.4 ...a.i L. U.1N. Y. r.brq
un.tlu.... M. f[z a tOenN N r.r\u Y.Y.W /wnY 1Y(1 .r..1a
4.\lev U. .m.1Y.Y.✓ N..Co.Y• a.nr M. .11 taY..M.\ N•W C.
Y1.0 fN\: .v n fenn Co.Co. Nn. .W2d tN\1 1.r.aenY Y• L• a.n. Mp.10 tNfl
O Yp1\ a- Co. Yn. W,CC n•q I.—Yna Y•Co. r . 11a.a0 tNtl Yv.. i
I awn W Co. b\. Yf.W M1.y 1 u.. NY Y•W. r... JY.Y t•nl Yn .e eo.Y
.Y .vnM.Um nY.b iM] nY 1W e[tb M1Wn pno YYI .f Y1a lNgw I
1`. .... ....1 .t YYN...Y Y.Y un.n Y .. Nia un.gY. va.r h.1. hr
.Y dTn.[l. • [er Yd M1M.. We. .im) Co..Y Nua U, .nWYry LW
f.l1CY1
• uh.Y 1v W COvpq.r M,&C t. i .r Y11rvnN. w rn Nn.nhy..... wa Y1
Y(lm1Y Y . Co. Y .v. Y>Y ua. it., •r.N dVl Wa• 1onY 1.1b1 .r i..nm u:
Mb\U d fn.p. Co. Il r... d.a.d+ L. Y.. Y o N....1S YnnW Yi.Y M.1
1 R2 [1' Ynun . .1 tY [1NYYt aY[.n Yhl Y.na MtiY r N ru.W
1M/e a:L tl•W 1.1. WN[fn.l tYw�aY1a 1d•Oa• N.ar /W.W M1.\I Yr.1 1
'!Ne o• Y• ry WbOD hnl 1pYn �m1d Y•Y• M.. ]Y[.•< M11 Ilvw [Y1a
Y• dM a•n. n.Y Mh I. i..Y U. u. ao\ WbW n.0 tMN Ltn a•Y. Y
W.Y M1: 1YW awt]e•Y• CC.. M.W Mh I. MY O•U.
1Yw Yvta Y•Y• YN. N4W hnt Ww MY Y•Yr Ma. rW.W Mal aY.w
Y[Y 1[•W' Y/t. WIp.Sd !nh tYY. aNfa Y• 11•L... Y[id h.q YM Nn\
Y•Or Yn. AMM" :1.11 YM. Yma a•W. W YY. M.Y Mi. Yn o Yu. Y
Y IaYM.1:Y YY 1Y MY I'
YY Y iY dw1WY asnY'Sal [f
Yw!•.!J Yna. Yy. lL at'N\ a.2.1J.L..YY YY1 Y Y1/Mn1Y Y1Y YaNY: .••,••
1 Yi wMi] YnutY L.I� Mi M.tY M.tY•Y.Yr[Y W MW//a[rMi i�. „L;:
R.t le YY am.no .rYY1aa a.1.aam w la./r Y"to.as a 1M-
�n e4=�:waMaw ss.wa tv.1J11I1.^..'alYPW G[H/rc s....4L aL•Ilo t'�Sk
v
i
- -- ----- —-------------- Hoy;-,Na v6s I°I
infer rS to.[en YrY Y .PqN U\V Y tb Fv\NY\ pnY Ifal r!.Y! ,
anae. J. R\n it wlwl wnY w lYl\r.r tar nHYleyf er\N aW\wr. '
r'MY 1 ie\r M1 Y[.q CWry. W Yrm4 1\ Ir WrL to \N Yrt '
arrrYY K ad• nY Up rt Y YM. W YwwA.N[ P\L/-eet• r mP b
"\[l Llt.. y u1L prmr. Y mqui. Fq 1Nnrrw. }Y Yn .f rrr.
r nY CHr[rur6 K Ar Cl\)rf i Yw. Yu YPIn [ PILw[
� Ara [Knru\L IYYaH r uurHcr.. W '.M1 Lnn eS YrrrH rbnP e.- '
Pn Yr. uL.e[nW w rnryn)rnlYlm nrprvnJ[w.nrY. Y. rN tN rp
IL 'vnA n[bYL q d P NaYt R Yll Rq K Y 4M. rJ Pmr'et•nn A rnl
Gy rn�bnb RnrYr b bo OY YrWyP Nr onitb. rN PneMA. rr 7) N
naYPL b U.. N mYH. Y ab C1\p 11J1 ynl HtN a.,rY\. tb rfpu�r tr
r..rd rY ema. 1 un nntA apa t - r.e a msYtlr
rrr rrU rK n�ITU FtnLWLrtl.YHN rr[b IYP.�1T •.n.C[CH) NW\S
LT\b 0y OS! Ywr O r n(u).f aRV t4mf. bli o t'✓ N! Y)P MrrYp
I.. rr IY .1.11 NNI llrr� 1R[\wr nNb Y.:1\r. iYn. bpur
- f. wr[ rr.awr )Yr• IwrH rn.tm b.
'AnWu Wll r. r. :al Cbr4
t rY tY.aW YrWRY Ir bnb pmwr YY LN Pq rf iwrbp irn. '
4 i. Ymp Tnrlrur sr tY MP.f �
ur YHe et\N CN K
Lie u.
' I bPA unlry tY S NIV b Y r F11. ip.Y w nr\ oil et w appal P
RL \.b efRY. m YY4 arum t• lfR• -
' iL..ry..Y rn l2iv of is n�ecY.a rr w '
� Yrrnrl. er lorw. i.e. P. :ln, a Y..r.nrt l l.a a • u. Aw rz
rr omR.i i.«w. o[.m piny Y.ow. mnP Ylwr. c y a:.°arrf. - ..
INSf.Fn K vl 'Yl PnfYl n nSYn K tt4 CFrL W r. C-l H tle.p�ll
1•n.FeHa Ib.F:pmr. c. :. YY.. YYb Yrr*-�-r.b 9i':P.:.:'r- arvtr.
r.• 6�
�p z
V
" qq0
LL 4
L, u
2`
o
4�
�p5f t
$EWE p8AND0NafEN
EKy18��8.
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS r ng Date To eao.
02/25/98
AGENDA REPORT Ihem Number Rem he
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: GRANT OF EASEMENT AND QUITCLAIM DEED WITH IRVINE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR PROPOSED
RELOCATION OF AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 4
EASEMENT SEWER.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Accept Grant of Easement from Irvine Community Development Company for
proposed relocated sewer.
2. Execute Quitclaim Deed for existing sewer easement to Irvine Community
Development Company.
SUMMARY
CSD No. 7 has an 8-inch sanitary sewer within a 15-foot easement that crosses
Tract No. 15420 through the extension of Theta and Fairweather Roads. The
developer, Irvine Community Development Company, in order to accommodate
Tract No. 15420 development plans, has requested the District's permission to
abandon the existing sewer easement and to build a new 8-inch sewer. The new
sewer will run parallel to the existing sewer and approximately five feet north to
match the proposed realignment of the center line of the new easement. This
necessitates executing a Quitclaim Deed for the existing easement and recording
Grant of Easement for the new sewer location.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
G NlpbCallrbeMa pall RepIPVPM QMKKY.`I pilmenl OII`�ap[
Re ,.wee Page 1
i
ra
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Grant of Easement— Exhibits "A" & "B"
2. Quitclaim Deed— Exhibits "A" & "B"
G:VtlglobaMgenda 0rafl ReportsUoint Bearas,04 easement 02M%.dw
G N V�M1M�+a�6J1 Re W a W M BoarllNr amrerM1 OII'�E¢
RexfeE 1598 Page 2
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
ComwS i II D�
r of ran Coun
W WHEN RECORDED MAILTO
Penny Kyle
County SaallaUan Diauicts
of Orange County
Pon Offitt Box 8127
Fmmtain Vallev.CA 92728.8127
SPACE ABOVETRRLDIE FOR RECORDER'S USE
AP.No.: 50109}13-Gly ofTwUn
GRANT OF EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE,mtle.M mLnd Imn Nb AD W day orleeuary, 1998 bym,d Letwwa
IMne Community De Iopment Company,A Delaware Corporation,
Granbr,
aM Cmnty SvNUOon DkWn of OMM,Gunry.CJibndq apublk m,eadoo,G..
WIT'FIESSETH: Pura wluoLlemmidanlbnLM Granbrdm Lertbygnnt unb DKGMIee UKmrvnent and egAL ofmy
b oublbh mnrb,d W mvaWn for Ji Umea puNk n+erorreuvs mM appmtounm W duuugh,en aM Jong dutamai
ml property alamel In Ne County of Onnp,SUM of Caltfmnla,mom panku arty dendbM as fuUons:
Sold iaM u de bed ut ErhlNt aA"mM shown on Fahibit"B"attached hertm and made a part of hereof
by this rtfetenc.
Tract No. 15420
AS MAYLe nrmmry for the tw"wminNbnof Me union,nmupl win,Gnnae stall Lae Ne tight b mm,upon aoe
undpbdngatl.of Gmdor. For ue purpmeo(ayUry m,uuWing mTnar^'N^g aWmd^&nwi^ul^L'g'WJe^&u^a8
end apnWg W nnhuysewvpipNLm Gm,tw JWI Iuue Ne right b mmrgmn eM pvu wervM Jong uW eenwnt w
m dry,orLL bP14 aplemenu aM oN«mat«Wa ure,mn.eM amake myaM ell umwuonr ntlLreryarmlle011eaL.
THIS GRANT mean unloGnnaronly soak bMrnping,uderayand madnay dgh0«wN mtW rf mDorp hb[t
ue Imendmmplueu aMmiM Mby Gramm,lbmm mn wigns,orthedp,bw«mnenbhambygm ,
THIS GIANT b made by Ne Grmeorunkrue rJl uMemaMing—dwMNon Nat UUGm,l«,byao,nann of Nb gm,4
hu Ue dghtbpemunmUy mnomdl Nine uenan Umlinlvfert MN Ne puryore lm rvhW Wdm«mmtbgor,rtl. FwNv,
It 4apvd Ly rM Gm,mr Nat aM rtnclurt plawd upon,ar bae,Plvnt w Yuu4 pWlal on,vbng,wtlixent b Wd eammnt
mmftl, m MbyUe aurfm«wiN Ue mahunun«Nermitlull ge mowdb/NeG,anmrx iffi vpvuewhn nat'Sid
a aMW,gadomLylhe Gnu«. Fnme4 hbnnhrmoM Nat mllretllpnaN nehpuNkemwm¢wvsmnrLneftlmNerd
pmpnty deraNtl emw mry Le nook o,dy upon mimmmplbn«tlNrwh dner,d mgulatbw uGm,tmdaU tlopl ho,n Wee
b Ww end h«p on Ne a the oDim ofiu mmfcry.
'fO HAVE AND TO VOID omo Necm,m fartw ar Nn we obpn.M purporeofm:mamdMeM melnuWng u,mmn
•puNlve.mmsmwnuW.ppumnmw IMreb cmna+r dghb rha0 Ldude Ne fight bmwwJatl rmaWn mv:«rmd4
meMJn,Jrdw,6ae ott..pumpagwtllr.pumpae auUon4 mwnag Jelbns,Janepipe end rmv4z m,ueatlon ennum
eppurknu,tmuNlbe mluea ofuuN,avpipewhM JM««myuLmdabove Ne rudewalJegmud.
Doled
STATEID'ChIMORNIA
COUNfYOF SS.
On Lefine me,NeatlemgM.•Nomry
rnNk a.M rwnu cmmy.M wa.pmmuy•Baud
4mnnbmel«pmmdb en Nehmdab4aury
evidewe)uLe d,e pemnm wh�um
enanM Ne nmr.
ISM
Nrx RYPe«Pdmd)
Namy P,iNsa rM ta Wd ComryeM Stye
v
EDIT ttA"
GRANT OF EASEMENT
That portion of Lot 4 of Tract No. 12870 as filed in Book 601, pages 1-20, inclusive, of
Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, being a 15.00 foot
wide strip of land, the northerly line of which is described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of Fairweather Road with the northwesterly line
of said Lot 4; thence N 40"40'12" W along said northwesterly line 10.00 feet to
the True Point of Beginning; thence S 49"19'48" E 129.00 feet to a point on the
southwesterly extension of a line that is parallel with and distant 10.00 feet
northwesterly at right angles from the intersection of Theta Road with the northerly
line of said Tract No. 12870; thence N 40"42'06" E along said parallel line 164.93
feet to said northerly line of Tract No. 12870.
Thlegal description wasprepared by me or under my direction.
Robert N. Mint Mack, L.S. 5314 O p
�o
Na S3I4
,k DR 19/d ?
/ Z- 9— y7
Date �f OF CAI� �
SCALE: 1" = 40' EXHIBIT "B"
v SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
POSE TO RANGE CO FOR SEVER PUR-
POSES RI ORANGE SANITATION
DISTRICT no. 7 GRANTED HEREON.
TRACT NO. 2806 M.M. 132 / 48-50
D.
l o l
a
18
0
N4917'54"W I 55114 39' —
- 129.09'
S
r, o vi
V o
'O
a n
0 N
Cn a
co
m
co 31 m 15'
m m W
� g
y� N
O
b z
z
co o 4
�T
CV
N4919'4WW 129.00'
FAIRWEATH in
C3ROAD
TRACT NO, 12870 M.M. 601 / 1 - 20
U o
Q a
rLc- 31 `
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
W
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Name:
Street Address:
C4 3 state:
DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS SPACE
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
Name Irvine Community Development Co., a Delaware Corporation
Sbeet
Address 19600 Fairchild, Suite 150
city a
State Irvine, CA 92612
AR.NO: 501-093-13—City of Tustin
QUITCLAIM DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, A Public Corporation
hereby REMISE(S), RELEASE(S)AND FOREVER QUITCLAIM(S)to
Irvine Community Development Company, a Delaware Corporation
The following described real property in the unincorporated territory of the county of Orange, state of California:
Said land as described in Exhibit 'A"and shown on Exhibit'B"attached hereto and made a pan hereof by this reference.
Dated County Sanitation District No. 7
Of Orange County,
A Public Corporation
By:
Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
H:tw .d1aleng1ENGM \9910uldaim 0275.dm
1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF )
On before me,
Notary Public, personally appeared
_personally know to me - OR - _proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the data below W not required by law,a may prove valuable to persons relying on the document end=W prevent fraudulent
reattachment of We form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Individual
Corporate Officer
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
rdle(s)
Partner U.W
General NUMBER OF PAGES
AttomeyanFact
Toustee(s)
GuardiaNConservaW
Other: DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Name of Person(s)or ErNty(iea)
-SIGNERS)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
HAWP.DTA¢NMENG0308QUITCLAIM LINE W.DOC
PAGE 2 OF QUITCLAIM DEED
v
E IT "All
(QUITCLAIM OF EASEMEN1)
That certain easement acquired by the Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 in the Final
Judgment in Condemnation as filed in Book 7417, page 528 of Official Records in the office of
the County Recorder of County of Orange, State of California.
This legal description was prepared by me or under my direction.
Robert N. Mim Mack, L.S. 5314 rAP.'1 61/99
Date
SCALE: 1" = 40' EXHIBIT "B"
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
® POSE' VADTO RANGE OD FOR SEINER
ANIT PUR-
POSES TO ORANGE CO.P 7 07/52710N
DISTRICT ITC A PER O.R 7407/528
TO 8E OUITp11NED.
TRACT NC. 2806 M.N�I.E 132 / 48-60
W I o
-18 I poi I 17
0
N49.17'54"W 1 0 5514.39' —
r�mr
n 310
^ 129.09'
1 500'
m 0
CD Wto 4
-cz- _ — -
(V o
FAIRWEATH$E R m N49.
6ROAD
z TRACT NJ, 12870 M.M. 601 / 1 - 20
a
J �
a
<[ z
r 31
�- County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O.Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
Wednesday, January 28, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, January 28, 1998, at the Districts'
Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT:
John J.Collins,Joint Chair Thomas L.Woodruff,General Counsel
Peer A. Swan,Vice Joint Chair Ryal Wheeler
George Brown, Chair, FAHR
Burnie Dunlap,Chair, PDC STAFF PRESENT:
Pat McGuigan,Chair,OMTS Donald F. McIntyre,General Manager
Blake P.Anderson,Assistant General Manager
Greg Mathews,Principal Administrative Analyst
ABSENT: Ed Hodges,Director of General Services Admin.
Bill Steiner,Director/Supervisor Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
MOTION: Receive, file and approve draft minutes of the December 17, 1997 Steering Committee
meeting. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 2
January 28, 1998
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
Joint Chairman Collins discussed the City of Garden Grove's membership on the Board of
Directors. They continue to send two people. The mayor is the District Board representative
unless the mayor appoints another. Only one member will be assigned to a committee from
each city. The mayor of Garden Grove will be contacted to discuss who will serve on one of the
working committees.
Chairman Collins then announced the committee assignments for new Directors:
Planning. Design and Construction (PDC) Committee:
Mary Ann Jones replaces Tam Carroll
Finance. Administration and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee:
John Gullixson replaces Mark Schwing
Operations. Maintenance and Technical Services (OMTS) Committee:
Don Bankhead replaces Chris Norby
Al this time, no replacement will be named for Hank Wedaa
There are no changes in committee chairmen.
Chairman Collins asked when resolutions of appreciation for departing Board members would be
presented. He will notify these past directors by letter when the Board considers these
resolutions.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager McIntyre reviewed the cost per million gallons (mg) for the past six years. The
budgeted cost for this year is $490. He reported that for the first six months of this fiscal year the
cost per mg is $477.43.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel did not make a report.
DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-7)
1. Recommend to the Joint Boards of Directors that the Joint Chairman be authorized to send
letter to IRWD reaffirming the Districts' commitment to honor existing agreements between
agencies after consolidations of the nine County Sanitation Districts into one County
Sanitation District. General Counsel indicated that IRWD has not commented on the draft
letter.
After a brief discussion, it was unanimously agreed to forward the recommendation to the
Joint Boards for consideration.
2. Concur with FAHR Committee recommendation to approve the Early Retirement Incentive
Program through March 30, 1998.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
w Page 3
January 28, 1998
This action was approved by the FAHR Committee at their Special Meeting on February 21,
through it was not unanimous. Mr. McIntyre commented that this program is a major cost
reduction opportunity. While two or three of the vacated positions have been filled, most
have not.
The members of the Steering Committee concurred with the FAHR Committee
recommendation.
3. Mr. McIntyre described the 1998-99 Budget Process. The budget calendar was discussed.
Several steps require Board involvement. A special ill-day session for all Directors is
scheduled for Saturday, May 9, to receive an overview of the proposed budget and ask
questions.
The parameters will be discussed with the working committees during February and March.
There will be some discussion on debt issuance because of changes in the Strategic Plan.
In April, the CORP budget will be discussed with the committees. While the budget may not
be 100% complete, all of the items will be presented for review and comment.
The final budget will be adopted at the June 24 Regular Boards of Directors Meeting meeting.
Chairman Collins said that Midway City Sanitary District has sent a letter indicating that they
were not supporting short-teen loans, and would be voting against this issue at tonight's
meeting.
Director McGuigan asked if rate equalization was addressed in the budget. Chairman Collins
said that until consolidation was accomplished, rate equalization would not be considered.
4. The Critical Goal Development Process for 1998-99 was discussed. Mr. McIntyre stated that
this was the third year that staff prepared critical goals, and several changes are being
proposed for the coming year. This year, division managers will be involved in the process
as well as the department heads. For the first time, some goals may be planned for several
years.
Action item: Staff will report back to the Steering Committee on how the new goals may
affect the budget parameters.
5. Greg Mathews presented an update on DART's Phase 3 deliverable, a comprehensive report
on the re-engineering process. Many issues are being researched and analyzed. The DART
members are now sharing with management some of the results of their research, issues,
concepts and philosophies. The goal is to present the report to the Directors in April.
6. Update on Penn/Wilson Compressor Delivery Problem. Ed Hodges explained the
background and where we are in the process. General Counsel also described the actions
they have taken on behalf of the Districts to date. During Closed Session at tonight's Board
meeting, the Directors will be asked to make a recommendation on how to proceed. Director
Swan indicated that in the future letters of credit should not be allowed to expire, regardless
of circumstances.
7. The list of agenda items scheduled for review by the working committees was not discussed.
l
1yC
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 4 d
January 28, 1998
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
With the implementation of consolidation on July 1, 1998, there will be many decisions necessary on
routine items and rules of order, including installing a new Board of Directors. Chairman Collins
suggested that a special Board meeting be held Wednesday, July 1, 1998, to consider these issue,
including the election of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. Normally, nominations are held
in June with elections at the July meeting. Nominations can be made in June but not closed.
Election of District Chairs is usually held in May, and after discussion it was decided that the Joint
Chairman would make a recommendation in May to waive the Districts Chairs elections and extend
the current terms through June 30, 1998.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
There are several conflicts with scheduled meetings. As a result, the following changes will be
made:
• The April 9, 1998 Ad Hoc Committee meeting will be rescheduled.
• There will be a Special Board meeting on July 1, 1998.
• The July 22, 1998 Regular Board meeting will be changed to July 29.
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for February 25, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:01 p.m.
pt�mitted by:
Tappan, Steerifig Committee Secretary
01aWmMeV^IEEflWG WMMIREPBBUPMOtR99 minubs.Cx
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY. FEBRUARY 4 1998 - 5 30 P M
A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held
on February 4, 1998, at the Districts' Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Present Staff Present:
Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
John Collins, Joint Chair Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin.
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Chris Dahl, Director of Information Technology
Steve Anderson Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager
Don Bankhead Ed Torres, Air Quality & Special Projects Manager
John E. Noyes Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager
Dave Sullivan Kevin Hadden, Regulatory Section Supervisor
Charles E. Sylvia Pat Magnante, Committee Secretary
Absent: Others Present:
Margie L. Rice None
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the December 3, 1997 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
meeting were approved as drafted.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 2
February 4, 1998
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
New member Don Bankhead was welcomed to the Committee.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Don McIntyre reported on the following items:
• Handouts were distributed on CSDOC's Travel Policy and on impacts of the new cost
allocation process.
• Selection of New Training Manager-Terri Josway was appointed as the new Training
Manager in addition to her role as Safety Manager.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Blake Anderson reported that the FY98199 budget cycle is moving forward at the staff level now.
Major items of consideration are the Five-year Staffing Plan (15% staff reduction over the next five
years), critical goals of the organization to be accomplished, ongoing operating requirements (core
business) and capital improvements. A meeting was held on Monday with Department Heads and
Division Managers to begin to describe what the critical goals will be for the next fiscal year.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (Hodges)
Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, reported on the followed items:
• Last Tuesday we finished a print ad for Mercedes Benz at Plant No. 1. For the half-day
shoot, we received $1200 for their use of the facility. The Central Generation facility was
temporarily altered to look like a crash test site for this ad.
• Tule Ranch has been trying to obtain AB2766 funds to convert their vehicles over to C&G.
We received verbal notification that the San Joaquin Air District will award $214,000 to Tule
Ranch to convert an additional six vehicles. This will go under a consent item next month at
the San Joaquin Air District Board meeting.
• Penn-Wilson-The goal we are trying to achieve is to get the compressor unit up and running
with the understanding that we will then attempt to transfer the sale of the facility to a private
company. We have been discussions with Pickens Fuel Corporation, which is one of the
larger CNG station operators and owners in the area, about the possibility of taking over the
ownership of that and buying us out and in turn giving us a little bit of revenue for every gallon
of gas sold. In order to make the deal work for them, they would need a total of ten vehicles
as a base load for the station. With the five vehicles from Pima Gro and six vehicles from
Tule Ranch they would have enough load for the station. We are negotiating to obtain an
auxiliary compressor unit to fuel the Pima Gro vehicles. Engineering is working on a Change
Order to purchase a substitute compressor.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 3
February 4, 1998
• The proposed Plant No. 2 land lease with Village Nurseries will be brought forward to the
Committee next month. The original proposal, which included a 30 acre parcel at $1,000 per
acre with a 30-day notice of lease termination, has now been reduced by Village Nurseries.
Village Nurseries came back last week with proposed changes to the terms not only in
acreage (from 30 acres to 20 acres) but also decreased significantly the dollar per acre they
want to offer. The City of Huntington Beach has been notified of our intentions to lease this
parcel.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY(Dahl)
Chris Dahl reported that he will give a slide presentation next month which will be an overview of our
office and Plant computerization automation plans.
Director Swan requested that the March presentation include the Districts' original proposal for
automation plans, where we are in its implementation and a critical assessment of each
computerized system at the Districts. The two levels of the J-42 plant automation project were
explained and discussed.
Director McGuigan stated that there may be a need to reschedule some of the Agenda Items for
March in order to provide adequate time for the above-referenced presentation.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (Ooten)
Mark Esquer reported on the following items for Bob Dolan who was not in attendance:
• Chemicals -There were no new chemical purchases to report on.
• Natural Gas -We are in-line with budget expenditures. Gas prices have dropped to below
the $2.80 that we contracted for. We are stretching our operations to minimize any over-
expenditures and it is not anticipated that O&M will go over budget for the fiscal year.
• Storm Update-We received under two inches of rainfall in our area. We experienced flows
of about 400 mgd which is about 30 percent higher than the normal peak flow for the day.
Staff utilized the High Flow Emergency Response Plan and everything went well. We lost
Edison power at 14th Street at about 6:30 a.m. but power was restored by 9:00 a.m. Storm
drains and the corking of holes in manhole covers were also discussed.
O&M Monthly Report
Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report: A report for the months of November and December is
submitted to the OMTS Committee for review. This report focuses on compliance, safety, financial
data and performance measures for O& M and is intended to provide Committee members with
information on a timely basis.
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 4
February 4, 1998
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES
Mahin Talebi reported on the following items for Nancy J. Wheatley who was not in attendance:
• The following handouts were provided: 1) Marine Monitoring Annual Report, 2) Brochure
detailing a half-day Workshop to be held at the Districts on March 11 entitled"Compliance—
How to Get There...". Blake Anderson will ask Nancy Wheatley to provide an Executive
Summary of the Source Control 1997 Annual Report to the Directors in March or April.
• The Laboratory may ask the Committee next month to approve out-of-country travel for Moy
Yahya to attend the Water Quality International Conference in Vancouver, B. C.
Director Collins requested that a record be kept of the issuance of the Source Control Annual Report
to the OMITS Committee so that additional copies are not issued in the future.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
DISCUSSION ITEl
1. OMTS98-001 800 MHZ LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
Motion:
Moved, seconded and carried to authorize staff to enter into a lease
agreement with the County of Orange for installation of an 800 MHZ system
at Plant No. 2 for a period of twenty (20) years.
2. OMTS98-002 PRIMARY EFFLUENT FILTRATION (PEF)TEST PROGRAM.
Motion:
Moved, seconded and carried to receive progress report for PEF project and
approve project funding increase of$57,000 to cover additional project
overhead caused by a change in the Districts' accounting procedures.
3. OMTS98-003 PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD WASTEWATER TECHNOLOGIES
CONFERENCE IN TAIWAN.
Motiom
Moved, seconded and carried to approve one week of staff time for out-of-
country travel for Jane Tran. All expenses to be paid by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA).
Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance
and Technical Services Committee
Page 5
February 4, 1998
4. OMTS98-004 NPDES OCEAN DISCHARGE PERMIT-STATUS REPORT ON RENEWAL
APPLICATION.
Motion
Information only.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
No other business.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
Director Swan requested a comprehensive report on Districts automation at the next OMTS meeting
to be held on March 4, 1998.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for
March 4, 1998 at the Districts'Administrative Offices.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Submitted by:
Patricia J. MagnaVe
Operations, Maintb ance and
Technical Services Committee Secretary
K=RDTA\OM1810W,AGN WE\OMTS_C-1WEa98NIN_0298 WPD
OMTS nI�eepp� Date 1,r.en .
z/'Y�YB d oZ.i
AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Nu r
OMf578'-oof /9 /C J
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration CON
Originator: Chuck Winsor, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: 800 MHz Lease Agreement with the County of Orange
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to enter into a Lease Agreement with the County of Orange for
installation of an 800MHz system at Plant No. 2 for a period of twenty (20) years.
SUMMARY
The Federal Communications Commission has informed us that they intend on
taking our 453 MHz communication frequency away from us and are
encouraging us to get onto the 800 MHz band. This will happen sometime after
the turn of the century, probably between 2005-2007.
During the term of the twenty (20) year contract, the Districts can terminate the
agreement by giving the County two years written notice. The County will NOT
pay any monies to the Districts during the term of the lease, but will allow us
access to the system free of charge. In 1995 the Districts' participation in the
800MHz backbone was estimated to be $1,800,000.
The most important points of the agreement are:
• The location of the tower and the building to house the communication
equipment will be located north of OOBS and just east of the drying beds at
Plant 2. This sighting is consistent with the direction given to us by Directors
Detloff and Sullivan.
• The agreement is for a 20-year term.
• During the term of the contract, the Districts can terminate the agreement by
giving the County 2 years written notice.
• The County will NOT pay any monies to the Districts during the term of the
lease, but will allow us access to the system, free of charge (in 1995 the
Districts participation in the 800MHz backbone was estimated to be
$1,800,000).
\YppXyYlMp A \jYM1Pl,p0��YgT�YM2NOfA1X2Ipr„Er Pµ I OMrS OaC
a«•.a. ,�n5 Page 1
• The Districts and the County have agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the
other party.
• The City of Huntington Beach planning department will be done with their
review of the County's documents in approximately 8 weeks from now.
• The County has been directed to make sure that their contractor complies
with our rules regarding the look of the building (split faced block vs. smooth
faced block), construction noise restrictions (no construction before 7:00 am
or after 5:00 pm), etc.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None. Districts 800 MHz usage will be exchanged for County use of Districts'
property.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
None
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
EEH: fw
WmE W I%y babMWIPfo0: S0. HZLL4YM.IHi 4...Rg MIS Ex
R. 1� Page 2
OMTS COMMITTEE M"Wg Dme To A ads.
2/4198 2 25t98
AGENDA REPORT IMM Numoer II Nu ber
OMTS98-002 �'/Q
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: Robert Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance RO
Originator: E. Torres, Air Quality & Special Projects Manager Er
SUBJECT: PRIMARY EFFLUENT FILTRATION (PEF) TEST PROGRAM
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive progress report for PEF project; 2. Approve project funding increase of
$57,000 to cover additional project overhead caused by a change in accounting
procedures.
SUMMARY
Primary Effluent Filtration (PEF) uses physical filters to remove contaminants
[suspended solids, (TSS) and organic material (BOD)] from wastewater.
PEF testing was done to determine the improvements in treated water quality it
could provide and the operating conditions necessary to achieve those
improvements. There was evidence that substantial cost reductions might be
achieved with PEF supplementing or replacing costly secondary treatment. Although
there are several PEF technologies available, no directly comparable data have
been available to evaluate them, so the Districts conducted a test of three filters to
generate the data needed to make informed decisions about future operations.
Important variables with PEF are the particle removal ability and the operating costs.
These differences can impact plant operations by affecting settling characteristics,
plume dispersion profiles, and potential disinfection requirements for reclamation.
The table below shows typical TSS and BOD values for wastewater streams with
various types of treatment. Based on this information, the PEF was expected to
remove 25% to 75% of the TSS and 5%to 50% of the BOD.
In the actual tests with each filter operating over a wide range of conditions, the TSS
and BOD removal efficiencies of all three filters were similar. With the filters
removing 40% to 70% TSS and 10% to 30% BOD, the filtered effluent generally
would have satisfied the NPDES permit's TSS and BOD requirements for ocean
discharge. The filters did not effectively remove bacteria or viruses (nor were they
expected to).
X W Ela`pM4BPbom�T ra PEF PMW
Revell 1N1197 Page 1
Operating cost analyses showed substantial differences among the filters due to
differences in the chemical requirements and the energy consumption. The lowest
and highest operating costs differed by almost 500%.
These results will be incorporated in the Districts' Strategic Planning activities, which
will include a more extensive cost comparison of PEF and secondary treatment.
The PEF project is expected to be completed during the third quarter of the current
fiscal year.
Primary Treatment
(Values in mg/L)
TSS BOD
Typical CSDOC Influent 220.230 230-240
Primary Treatment(w/o chemicals) 75-85 160.170
CSDOC Advanced Primary Treatment(1996-97) 55-68 110.130
Primary Effluent Filtration:literature values 15-40 65-105
CSDOC test results 9-49 67-107
(achieved 40-70% (achieved 10-30%
removal) removal)
NPDES Discharge Limit 60 100
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Current budgeted amount: $ 80,000 Amount of this request: $ 57,000
Proposed total budget: $134,000 Expenditures as of 12131/97: $101,992
BUDGETIMPACT
X This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: p. 127, G@
X This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The project was budgeted in the current fiscal year for $60,000, which included
$19,500 for overhead charges. The total project charges as of 12/31/97 were
$101,992. Although the labor cost budget has not been exceeded, changes in
accounting procedures for allocating overhead have resulted in total overhead
charges of$53,000. By the end of the project, the accounting change is projected to
\NlenWul4,p.Eubn`MPbw'mVe��Rbr VEF Pr .a .
A 'W'1W Page
v
cause a total budget overrun of$57,000. Thus, an additional $57,000 is being
requested for this project.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In 1982, the Districts tested a Hydro-Clear° filter for primary effluent filtration. Since
that time, the Districts have implemented advanced primary treatment, which results
in lower BOD and TSS in the primary effluent, so the 1982 results are not applicable
to current conditions. Also, other filter technologies have been introduced, and there
have not been any reported side-by-side comparisons of the various filter options
that the Districts could have used to estimate PEF performance and costs.
ALTERNATIVES
Not applicable.
CEQA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
None.
EMT,.jpb
%l ftnW2WIM auw,mvau ff M aeF PMe d:
ft b IMM Page 3
OMTS COMMITTEE MeetingDate Toned:.
214198 2/25/98
AGENDA REPORT IMM NumMr Item NamDer
OMr599-003 /� P
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
Originator: Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager
SUBJECT: PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD WASTEWATER TECHNOLOGIES
CONFERENCE IN TAIWAN
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve one week of staff time for out-of-country travel for Jane Tran.
SUMMARY
Jane Tran, Source Control Project Specialist, has prepared a technical paper that has been
accepted for presentation at the March 1998 Printed Circuit Board Wastewater Technologies
Conference in Taiwan, and is requesting that the Districts authorize her attendance at the
conference. All expenses will be paid by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Staff time only. All expenses paid by EPA.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Ms. Tran has been invited by EPA to make a presentation at the Printed Circuit Board
Wastewater Technologies Conference in Taiwan in March 1998. She has been
selected as one of four speakers because of her expertise in printed circuit board
manufacturing processes and pretreatment programs. She will present a technical
paper regarding pollutant identification, wastewater characteristics, pollution prevention,
and treatment of waste streams discharged from printed circuit board manufacturing
processes.
H:\wp.dta\tsU590%vonwinU\AgendaTatwani.doc Page 1
L
This conference is part of the partnership between EPA and Taiwan and provides
opportunities for professionals from the U.S. to share their wastewater technical
knowledge with their colleagues. All expenses will be paid by EPA. Ms. Tran will be
using 44 hours of regular time to attend this conference.
ALTERNATIVES
The alternative is for the Districts not to approve Jane Tran's attendance at the conference.
CEQA FINDINGS
NIA
ATTACHMENTS
OMTS Committee:
1. Copy of presentation abstract
Steering Committee:
1. Copy of presentation abstract
2. Documentation Verifying Payment of Expenses by EPA
Joint Boards:
1. Copy of presentation abstract
2. Documentation Verifying Payment of Expenses by EPA
MT:Ivw
H9wp.dtaLLsQ590\vonwinciWgenaaTaiwan i doc Page 2
POLLUTANT IDENTIFICATION, WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTIC, POLLUTION
PREVENTION, AND TREATMENT FOR WASTE STREAMS DISCHARGING FROM
PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING PROCESSESS
by
Jane H. Tran
Project Specialist
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
In the manufacturing of printed circuit boards, different types of wastewater are being
generated from these wet processes: electroless copper plating, etching, acid copper
and tin/lead electroplating, nickel1gold tip electroplating, dry-film resist stripping, solder
and rack stripping, black-oxide coating, solder leveling. In order to provide effective
treatments for these waste streams, an understanding of pollution source and the types
of wastes/wastewater are the keys in determine the appropriate treatment. In addition,
waste segregation and pollution prevention management must also be applied to
optimize the treatment process. Also proper operation/maintenance of the pretreatment
equipment and adequate effluent monitoring are necessary to maintain compliance with
the discharge limits.
This presentation will cover the following topics:
■ Printed circuit board manufacturing processes and identification of their
associated pollutants
■ Wastewater characterization study of printed circuit board waste streams
■ Waste segregation and pollution prevention management
■ Waste management proposal and compliance elements
■ Description of different types of wastewater pretreatment systems: hydroxide
precipitation, chelated breaker application, ion-exchange, electrowinning/plate
out, sorption filter, cross-flow filtration, hexavalent chromium reduction, and
cyanide destruction
■ Proper operation and maintenance of the pretreatment system, and the
importance a self-monitoring program and a qualified wastewater operator
Tran, Jane
r From: FRANCESCA DICOSMO[DICOSMO.FRANCESCA@EPAMAIL.EPAGOV]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 1996 10:42 AM
To: tranj@csdoc.org; MOWDAY.DAVID@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV
Subject: EPA Travel Paperwork
Dear Jane:
Thank you for agreeing to participate in the
Wastewater Treatment Technologies and Pollution
Prevention Workshop to be held in Taipei, Taiwan.
As we discussed over the phone yesterday,
Region III will be sending you an official letter,
inviting you to particpate in the workshop. I
originally thought that it would be easier for you to
have your paperwork done by Region IX. On
second thought, I think that we will do your
paperwork here from Region III, since we will have
to do paperwork for the other invitees and 1 can
package them all together. So, please send me your
Social Security number,your title and your address at
your office. I will need these to fill out your
paperwork. When you return, you will complete a
travel voucher form(I will send you some)and send
it into Region III for processing. A check will then
be issued to you in the mail for your elligible
expenses. Basically,your eleigible expenses will be
the roundtnp airfare, hotel costs and taxes,
transportation costs to and from airports,and the
airport departure tax. You will receive a daily dollar
allowance for food and miscellaneous expenses. If
you have any additional questions, please do not
hesitate to call or fax me. My telephone is(215)
566-5549 and my fax is(215) 566-5102. Regards,
Francesca.
1
OMITS COMMITTEE Meeting Dae TO JLB
wise ` 35
AGENDA REPORT 'orrls9�nol'%�I°
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
Originator: James Colston, Regulatory Specialist-Water
SUBJECT: NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit-Status Report on Renewal Application
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
For Information Only.
SUMMARY
On December 17, 1997, the US Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (EPA) and
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, (Regional Board)jointly
issued a draft ocean discharge permit and a Tentative Decision Document evaluating the
discharge of effluent from our treatment facilities into the Pacific Ocean. These long awaited
documents start the public review process that will end with the issuance of a new ocean
discharge permit. The Districts'staff worked closely with EPA and the Regional Board staff in
evaluating the Districts' permit renewal application, which led to the terms of the permit. Overall,
Districts' staff believe that the permit is fair and contains reasonable conditions for our
continuing operation. Our one concern in the permit conditions is a provision that limits the
amount of solids which can be discharged into the ocean on an annual basis, a condition which
affects the amount of wastewater that receives secondary treatment. See additional information
below.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Information Item only.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The most important components of the permit include:
D Permit will again incorporate waiver of secondary treatment requirements of the Clean
Water Act.
H.1vy.Wtln155p SWJb EF RTMgenda Reps Fonnl dd
R—. 1^gw Page 1
D Permit limits for concentrations of TSS (solids measured as Total Suspended Solids) T
and BOD (oxygen demanding organic material) are similar to those in our existing ocean
discharge permit, except that the averaging period for BOD discharges has been
changed from 30 days to 90 days, giving us more operating flexibility.
D The annual mass emission limits for BOD discharges to the ocean is proposed for
elimination, with EPA requesting comment on this provision.
➢ The annual mass emission limit for TSS has been reduced from 30,000 metric tons
annually to 20,000 metric tons based on EPA's decision that discharges higher than
20,000 metric tons have the potential to cause environmental harm. This is discussed
further below.
➢ The permit will include a"reopenef clause that will allow the Districts to request an
increase in the mass emissions limit for TSS prior to the time the Groundwater
Replenishment System (GWR), the joint CSDOC/OCWD water reclamation project, is
completed if the Districts can demonstrate that Clean Water Act criteria for
environmental quality around the outfall are met. The clause will also open discussion
on concentration requirements to support water reclamation.
➢ The excellent performance of our Source Control program allows a reduction in the
number of toxics for which we have numeric limits. For those toxics with no permit
requirements, there are benchmarks to monitor changes in discharge.
D The permit will designate the surface waters from 1000 feet off shore to 3 miles offshore
and up to 10 feet deep for recreation.
D The new ocean monitoring program will have a component of core sampling to
demonstrate compliance with permit requirements, and additional strategic and regional
studies, approved on an annual basis, to help better understand the marine environment
and the impact of our discharge both locally and regionally.
➢ The beach monitoring program will be adjusted seasonally to better target beach use.
The Ocean Plan requires two additional bacterial tests not presently done by the
Districts.
➢ Required monitoring of influent and effluent is significantly reduced.
D Emergency discharge to the short ocean outfall and the Santa Ana River are once again
allowed, with (after the fact) approval from the EPA Regional Administrator and the
Regional Board Executive Officer and no requirement for disinfection.
Districts' staff does not believe that the science presented by EPA demonstrates that the limit on
the annual discharge of solids is needed to protect the environment. However,there is
uncertainty about which constituent of the solids, organic material or toxics, causes
environmental harm and when such harm will actually occur. Staff plans to put into the record a
statement about our interpretation of the scientific evidence that is available and to immediately
begin further studies to support an increase in the annual discharge limits to ensure we can
continue to cost effectively accommodate growth in our service area, at least until the GWR
System is online. We plan to conduct these studies as a part of the proposed ocean monitoring
program. While we have this disagreement with EPA on the science,we must acknowledge the
high quality of work by EPA staff, the openness with which EPA has discussed its concerns, and
EPA's recognition and reward for our excellent record of performance.
H'KJd4 EGgRA�pe„N Rp Fam].Ca
rm...n u,am Page 2
Y Listed below is a schedule of activities for renewal of the Districts'ocean discharge permit:
➢ December 18, 1997- EPA releases notice of public hearing, draft permit, and tentative
decision document approving the waiver.
➢ January 22, 1998-Workshop by the Regional Water Quality Control Board on the Districts'
proposed permit.
➢ March 6, 1998-Joint public hearing by the EPA and Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) to adopt the proposed permit (Newport Beach City Council Chambers at 9:30
a.m.).
➢ April 1998- Permit becomes effective.
ALTERNATIVES
NA
CEQA FINDINGS
NA
ATTACHMENTS
None.
JC:jc
N:1wp F., 1-2 Eo:
w--. 1^a. Page 3
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN,
AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday, February 5. 1998 at 5,30 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on February 5, 1998, at
5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Present: Staff Present:
Burnie Dunlap, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
John Collins, Joint Chair John Linder, Construction Manager
Shirley Dettloff, Vice Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
Brian Donahue Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Patsy Marshall Greg Mathews, Principal Admin. Analyst
Eva Miner-Bradford Mark Esquer, Engineering Manager
Christina Shea Chris Dahl, IT Manager
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Rob Thompson, Plant Automation Manager
Bob Zemel Kathy Millea, Engineer
Wendy Sevenandt, Associate Engineer
Absent Mark Castillo, Info Services Tech
Mary Ann Jones
Todd Spitzer
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the December 4, 1997 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were
approved as drafted.
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair had no report.
Minutes of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee
Page 2
February 5, 1998
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR
The Joint Chair had no report.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager was not present.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
The Assistant General Manager was not present.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
The Director of Engineering reported on the natural gas compressor associated with the Compressed
Natural Gas Fueling Facility being constructed at Plant No. 1. He advised that Tom Woodruff,
General Counsel, is attempting to negotiate the reimbursement of monies paid to Penn Wilson, since
they have refused shipment of the compressor built for us. Engineering is proceeding forward with
the contractor to negotiate a change order to supply and install a compressor from a different
supplier. Staff will be bringing a change order to the PDC Committee in April.
The Director of Engineering advised that staff is conducting a flow monitoring study as part of the
Strategic Plan. Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor, reported that two locations have been isolated
for a pilot manhole plugging program. The two locations, one in Balboa Peninsula and one in Yorba
Linda, were selected based on high flows observed during the December 6, 1997 storm. This pilot
program should give us an indication of the effectiveness of plugging manholes. Preliminary storm
flow data is due on March 1, 1998, and tentative results will be reported at the March PDC Committee
Meeting.
The Director of Engineering reported on the design of the Warehouse at Plant No. 2. In September
of 1997, the PDC Committee approved awarding a Professional Services Agreement to architect,
Lord Fleming, for the design of that Warehouse. Staff discussed the current cost estimate for the
Warehouse (based on the 50% design)with the Committee, and informed them that it could not be
constructed for the budgeted amount of$780,D00. After discussion, staff was told to proceed with
the design. A budget amendment will be presented to the Committee when plans and specifications
are approved at the May PDC Committee meeting.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
CHANGE ORDER REPORTS
Information Only Item.
Minutes of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee
Page 3
February 5, 1998
QUARTERLY REPORT ON PSA ADDENDA
Information Only Item.
INFORMATIONAL ITEM (Item No. 1)
1. PDC98-01: Information item only. Impact of New Cost-Allocation Process on Engineering
Department's Overhead and CORF Budget.
Greg Mathews gave a report on the New Cost-Allocation Process on Engineering
Department's Overhead and CORF Budget.
ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 2-4)
2. PDC98-02: 1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for plans and
specifications for the design of the automation of the existing solids storage facility at Plant
No. 1 and the design of a new solids storage facility at Plant No. 2 for an amount not to
exceed $795,101; 2) increase the project budget amount from $5,638,000 to$10,891,000.
($898,000 for P1-60, and $9,993,000 for P2-60). The automation of these facilities will result
in annual savings of$237,500.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
3. PDC98-03: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2) authorize award of a
contract for Job No. J-57, Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, to First Fire Systems,
Inc., providing for upgrades to the existing fire alarm systems at both plants to bring the
Districts into compliance with fire codes, for a total amount of$354,341.49; 3) authorize a
budget revision to increase the project budget from $507,000 to $560,000; and 4) receive and
file letters from West Star Construction, dated November 20, 1997 and December 9, 1997,
submitting and subsequently withdrawing their bid protest regarding bidder qualifications.
MOTION: 11 was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
4. PDC98-04: Approve Amendment No. 1 to Orange County Water District(OCWD) and County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning
for Groundwater Replenishment System.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS IF ANY
There were none.
w
Minutes of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee
Page 4
February 5, 1998
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
March S. 1998.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
Submitted by:
J
ail Cain
Planning, Design, and Construction
Committee Secretary
Hw MA1 NGVDDWYEBwN.WPD
PDC COMMITTEE Meebn9 Uzte Tun me.
2/5/98 2/25/98
AGENDA REPORT Item Number I umbe
G -02
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Kathy Millea, Engineer
SUBJECT: AUTOMATION.OF SOLIDS STORAGE FACILITY AT PLANT
NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-60, AND SOLIDS STORAGE FACILITY AT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-60.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for plans
and specifications for the design of the automation of the existing solids
storage facility at Plant No. 1 and the design of a new solids storage facility at
Plant No. 2 for an amount not to exceed $795,101; 2) increase the project
budget amount from $5,638,000 to $10,891,000. ($898,000 for P1-60, and
$9,993,000 for P2-60). The automation of these facilities will result in annual
savings of$237,500.
SUMMARY
The solids storage facility at Plant No. 2 is 15 years old and at the end of its
useful life. The solids storage facility at Plant No. 1 was constructed in 1991 and
is in good working condition. In February 1997, the Boards of Directors approved
a Professional Services Agreement with Montgomery Watson for the preliminary
design of the most effective rehabilitation of the storage facility at Plant
No. 2 and for the determination of the most cost-effective level of automation for
the facilities at Plant No. 1 and No. 2.
The preliminary design report recommended the construction of a new solids
storage structure at Plant No. 2 instead of rehabilitating the existing system. As
the facility must be kept operational during construction, it would be extremely
difficult and costly to rehabilitate the existing facility because the limited space
and equipment access would not be easily lend itself to temporary conveyance
equipment. Rehabilitation also showed both O&M and life cycle costs to be
higher than new construction. The report also recommended full automation of
the solids transfer and storage operations, and partial automation of the truck
loading operations at both plants.
In October 1997, the Districts solicited proposals from three firms to perform the
final design. Staff evaluated the proposals and recommends Carollo Engineers
to perform the design for an amount not to exceed $795,101. This is an increase
from their original fee. The Carollo proposal offered suggestions to better use
X 1ry W Wg1ENGW 1F?AR$�p%
RerkeO 11� Page 1
existing facilities and provide life-cycle cost savings. The Districts negotiated a
fee to include additional services beyond the original Scope of Work in the
Request for Proposals.
This project began as a single job number, Job No. J-46. In an effort to better
track costs spent at each plant and process area, the project has been split into
two job numbers, Job No. P1-60 and Job No. P2-60.
CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Contract Cost Summary Table.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
(Line Item CA.e.j 997-98 CORF)
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The total budget increase is from $5,638,000 to $10,891,000. The original
budget of$5,638,000 was an estimate developed before any engineering had
been performed. After Montgomery Watson completed the preliminary design
report, the problems with the Plant No. 2 facility were found to be more extensive
than originally estimated. Based on the construction cost estimate in the
preliminary design report, the budget amount has been increased. The budget
was also increased to account for the change in Districts overhead allocation
(from 60%to 150%). The new proposed budget amount is $10,891,000. See
attached Budget Information Tables for additional revised budget information.
The automation of these facilities will result in annual savings of$237,500.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The first objective of this project was to investigate the failing equipment at Plant
No. 2 and determine the most cost-effective rehabilitation solution. Figure 1,
attached, shows the solids equipment at Plant No. 2, which operates as follows:
1) Solids are transported to the solids loading building via conveyor belts (C1
and C2). The solids are initially stored in two large bins (Bin 1 and Bin 2).
2) At the time of truck loading, the solids are conveyed to a smaller truck
loading bin (Bin 3) using pumps and conveyor belts (Conveyor A and
Conveyor B).
3) The truck parks under Bin 3 on a scale. Bin 3 opens its bottom gates and
loads the truck until the appropriate weight is reached.
4) Bin 3 closes its bottom gates and the truck drives off the scale.
X Wy gabr .W 1.2R06x
Page 2
The following process related problems are noted:
• The conveyance of solids from the large bins to the smaller bins is a critical
problem. When the facility was built 15 years ago, the only method to convey
solids from the large bins to the smaller bin was Conveyor A. The frame of
Conveyor A is now rusted and weak at many points and several rollers need
replacement. After eight years of operation, increased solids production at
Plant No. 2 required additional conveyance equipment to assist Conveyor A
and Conveyor B. Two pumps were installed, but this blocked access to the
bottoms of the large bins making it difficult, if not impossible, to perform
maintenance work in that area. The pumps have now been operating for
seven years, and because maintenance could not be performed, the shafts
on the augers of the large bin bottoms are badly worn. The chain drive for
these augers, along with the knife gate valves, needs to be replaced.
• The smaller truck loading bin is also a problem. The bottom of the bin and
the truck weighing scale are worn and need replacement. There are not
enough valves to evenly distribute the solids into the truck, creating a
Department of Transportation violation. To correct this, the operator and
truck driver, communicating continuously via CB, manipulate the truck back
and forth on the scale to properly load the solids. This is very labor intensive
and time consuming. This time delay makes other trucks wait, which creates
congestion in the plant. Furthermore, trucking contract negotiations are
difficult because trucking companies claim financial loss due to these time
delays.
The preliminary design report investigated these existing problems and
determined the most cost-effective solution was not to rehabilitate the existing
facility but to construct a new one. As the facility must be kept operational during
construction, it would be extremely difficult and costly with the rehabilitation
option because the limited space and equipment access would not be easily lend
itself to temporary conveyance equipment. The rehabilitation option also showed
both O&M and life cycle costs to be higher than the new construction option, 35%
and 4%, respectively.
The second objective of this project was to determine the optimum level of
automation for the solids storage facilities at both plants. Automation would not
only reduce operator time, but would be invaluable to the facilities' data collection
capabilities. Automatic data collection would allow predictive maintenance to be
performed rather than post-failure or scheduled maintenance. Proper data
collection is necessary for trending processes and optimization of operations.
Decisions made from empirical data could better define operational strategies.
The preliminary design report determined the optimum level of automation would
be to fully automate the solids transfer and storage operations, while partially
automating the truck loading operations. Partial automation of the truck loading
H\ay.NeMiQ.ENG1PtEPM R W�Eec
N«� + Page 3
operations would allow truck drivers to load their own vehicles, with pre-
authorized amounts and within pre-authorized time windows.
Automation at Plant No.1 would result in an estimated cost savings of one FTE at
$55,000/year and $40,000/year in reduced hauling costs (due to truck loading
flexibility) for a total annual savings of$95,000. Total project cost is estimated to
be $898.000 for a simple payback of 9.4 years. Automation of Plant No. 2 could
easily be incorporated into a new facility design, with an estimated cost savings
of 1.5 FTEs at$82,500/year and $60,000/year in reduced hauling costs, for a
total annual savings of$142,500. This equates to a simple payback of 6.3 years.
In October 1997, the Districts solicited proposals from three firms to perform the
final design recommended in the preliminary design report. The three firms were
Carollo Engineers, Lee & Ro, Inc. and Montgomery Watson. Staff evaluated the
proposals in the following areas: response to Scope of Work, project approach,
suitability of project team and experience in truck loading, solids transport and
automation. While Carollo Engineers and Montgomery Watson have been
primary consultants on similar projects, Lee & Ro has only worked as a
subconsultant in this capacity. Staff determined Lee & Ro did not have the same
experience as the other two firms, and eliminated their proposal from the
selection process. The Lee & Ro fee proposal, therefore, was not opened.
Staff is recommending Carollo Engineers to perform the final design. The
Carollo proposal offered suggestions to better use existing facilities and provide
life-cycle cost savings. Their fee includes additional services to achieve the best
fife-cycle cost beyond the original Scope of Work in the Request for Proposals.
The fee proposal is $53,581 for P1-60 and $741,520 for P2-60, for a project total
of$795,101.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Build new, automated facility at Plant No. 2. Do not automate Plant No. 1.
2. Build new facility at Plant No. 2. Do not automate either facility.
Both alternatives include exclusion of automation. These alternatives are not
recommended as the Districts are moving toward a goal of unattended operation
and the estimated returns for automation are within a reasonable payback period.
CECA FINDINGS
Additional solids storage facilities were addressed in the 1989 Master Plan.
n a90aaoc
Rw, Page 4
ATTACHMENTS
To the PDC Committee:
1. Budget Information Table
2. Figure 1: Plant No. 2 Storage/Loading Hydraulic Profile
3. Staff Evaluation of Proposals
DAUKTM:jee
X Vvp Pebry(.EN4V IEg4p}.98p px
Rpvae6 1� Page 5
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Automation of Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 1
JOB NO. PI-60
ORIGINAL : PREVIOUSLY AMOUNT THIS TOTAL REVISED PERCENT PERCENT OVER
CONTRACT ' `AUTHORIZED CONTRACT
REQUEST COMPLETE BUDGET
AMOUNT CHANGES AMOUNT .: .-
PSA 53,581 53,581 0% 100%
TOTAL
0 0 53,581 1 53,581 1 0% 100%
Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 2
JOB NO. P2-60
ORIGINAL PREVIOUSLY; TOTAL REVISED
AMOUNT THIS PERCENT PERCENT OVER
CONTRACT AUTHORIZED
REQUEST : COMPLETE BUDGET'
AMOUNT � 'CHANGES - �: CONTRACT AMOUNT
PSA 741,520 741,520 0% 100%
TOTAL
0 0 741,520 1 741,520
K.p.dlalanglM %Pl-60k nl.d coat aummary.xlslPl-80&p260
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Automation of Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 1
Job No. P1-60
ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS , PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK AUTHORIZED -PROJECT.. BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL, EXPENDITURE COMPLETE
BUDGET• BUDGET•, INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE' REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)
DESIGN $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 12,175 $ 72,175 $ 7,000 $ 53,581 $ 60,581 $ 7,000 12%
CONSTRUCTION $ 330,D00 $ 330,00D $ 49,800 E 379,600 $ - $ - $ - $ 0%
STAFF $ 174.000 $ 174,D00 $ 272,225 $ 446,225 $ 13,000 $ 433.225 $ 446,225 $ 13,000 7%
TOTAL $ 564,000 $ 564.000 $ 334.000 $ 898,000 $ 20,000 $ 486,806 $ 506,806 $ 20,000 4%
•This project began as a sirgto lob number,Job No.J<8. To better track=18.the pmjecl has been split into Nrojob numbers.Job No.P180 and Job No,P2-50, The adopted budget wes nM broken down by these phases.
Therefore,how columns are an estimated bmakdpem of the s ople lob number into Iwo job numbers,and of the CORF budget into gene plains.
H\wp.dWWgtengVo.slDutlgMM2.xh;T1-00
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 2
Job No. P2-60
ORIGINAL CURRENT- PROPOSED ' PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTIiORRATION 1 TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE
BUDGET* BUDGET' INCREASE . BUDGET TO DATE' ". REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(X)
.. r . TI
DESIGN $ 540,000 $ 540,000 $ 411.120 $ 951,120 $ 58,000 $ 741,520 $ 799.520 $ 58,000 11%
CONSTRUCTION $ 2,970,000 $ 2,970,000 S 4,299,730 $ 7,289,730 $ - $ - $ - $ 0%
STAFF $ 1,564,000 $ 1,564.000 $ 206,150 $ 1,772.150 $ 112.000 $ 1,660.150 $ 1,772,150 $ 112.000 7%
TOTAL $ 5,074,000 $ 5,074,000 $ 4.919.000 $ 9.993,000 $ 170.000 $ 2,401,670 $ 2.571,670 1$ 170,000 3%
'IDis poje began es a sinplejob number,Job No.J46. To be0er tmM coats,the pmAd has been spht Mb twojOb numbms,Job No.Pt EO end Job No,P14f0. The adopted budget wee not token down by these phases.
Therefore,these cohrmns are an estimated brwinicn at of but single job number into two job number,and or Me CORF budpat into these phones.
H:1wp.dtebnf;%w0foans16ud9etbt2.sls\P2Eo
Conveyor A
Top of Bea
EL 41.00
i Belt Convrs CI and C2
rZ-r -TT-LT
-'-' Bin 3
loading)
?n Bin I i•.� Bin 2
Sheet Truck Scale
El. 1050 - - wN2 d1a. I2'dia
r
L 18'Screw Convey'"_J )� IS•Screw Conveyor
_Bell Conveyor B
FT Pump El.-13.50
(typical)
Soule Handling Project
County Sanilatlon Districts
of Orange County
Figure I
Plant No.2 Storagelloading Hydraulic Profile
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
STAFF EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
Job No. P1-60, Automation of Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 1
and Job No. 132-60, Solids Storage Facility at Plant No. 2
Carollo Lee & Ro Montgomery
Watson
Evaluator#1 50 38 45
Evaluator#2 50 37 44
Evaluator#3 55 30 30
Total Score (180 pis max) 155 105 119
Average Score (60 pts max) 51.7 35 39.7
Workforce Hour Estimate 7478 6800 6395
Fee Proposal $795,101 $736,667
`Carollo proposal offered suggestions to better use existing facilities and provide life-cycle cost
savings. Their fee includes additional services to achieve the best life-cycle cost beyond the
original Scope of Work in the Request for Proposals.
**Based on technical merit, Districts only considered the Carollo and Montgomery Watson
proposals. Lee 8 Ro fee proposal was not opened.
HAwp.dtabn9tENG%P1-60tProposa1 evaluation total.doc
PDCCOMMITTEE rneWngDaz I To3CBds.
02/05/98 OZIZ/sa
AGENDA REPORT " MWr
DG98-o3
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineers g
Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager
SUBJECT: Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades
Job No. J-57
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2) authorize award of a
contract for Job No. J-57, Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades, to First Fire
Systems, Inc., providing for upgrades to the existing fire alarm systems at both
plants to bring the Districts into compliance with fire codes, for a total amount of
$354,341.49; 3)authorize a budget revision to increase the project budget from
$507,000 to $560,000; and 4) Receive and file letters from West Star Construction,
dated November 20, 1997 and December 9, 1997, submitting and subsequently
withdrawing their bid protest regarding bidder qualifications.
SUMMARY
The plans and specifications for this project, Fire Alarm and Security System
Upgrades, Job No. J-57, were approved by the Boards of Directors at their meeting
of October 22, 1997. On November 18, 1997, two bids were received. The low bid
of$354,341.49 was submitted by First Fire Systems, Inc. A high bid of$414,391.90
was submitted by West Star Construction. The Director of Engineering recommends
award of the low bid contract to First Fire Systems, Inc. The engineer's estimate
was $335,000.
An increase in the total project budget from $507,000 to$560,000 is also
recommended by transferring an additional $53,000 from Districts' reserves. This
budget increase is requested to fund the higher construction cost, and to provide
additional funding for revised project management and overhead costs, additional
training, and a contingency. Please see the Additional Information Section for
details regarding the budget increase request.
West Star Construction submitted a bid protest questioning the qualifications of the
low bidder as a firm authorized to procure and install the Edwards System
Technology equipment specified in the contract documents. West Star Construction
was provided with the bid documents submitted by First Fire Systems, Inc. listing an
authorized firm as a subcontractor. Following West Star Construction's review of the
documents, they withdrew the bid protest as stated in their letter dated
December 9, 1997.
c 512 N
"..,..a 1a Page 1
t
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
See attached Budget Information Table.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: )
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
(Line item: CORF B-1, A.S.a ($350,000) and E.3.f($157,000)
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Funding for the project at Plant No. 1 was allocated in the 1997-98 fiscal year budget
under the Job No. P1-40-1 ($350,000). Funding for the project at Plant No. 2 was
allocated in the 1997-98 fiscal year budget under Security System Improvements
($157,000). To accomplish the construction of the fire alarm and security system
upgrades at both treatment plants, these two jobs were combined under one
construction contract with a new job number, Job No. J-57.
This transfer of funds to Job No. J-57 was approved by the Boards of Directors in
October 1997.An increase in the Job No. J-57 project budget from $507,000 to
$560,000 (+53,000) is requested to meet revised budget requirements. See the
Additional Information Section for details of this increase request. The additional
funding would be transferred from Districts' reserves.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The existing fire alarm systems within the treatment facilities have been installed
through multiple contracts as the plants have been expanded. These fire alarm
systems are grouped into six areas at Plant No. 1 and three areas at Plant No. 2.
Specific alarms are annunciated at the local fire alarm panel in each area with only a
single general alarm from each area annunciated at the Operations Control Center.
With only a general alarm at the Operations Control Center, it is difficult to determine
the nature of and the proper response to an alarm. To improve response time,
upgrades to the existing fire alarm system have been designed to bring specific fire
alarms to the Operations Control Centers at both plants. This upgrade will bring the
Districts into compliance with the National Fire Code. The fire alarm system will be
integrated with the existing CASI-RUSCO Security System so that all alarms will be
shown on the same emergency response computer terminal at the Control Centers
at both plants.
This project was an open bid for purchase and installation, but the specifications for
the project identified Edwards System Technology (EST) as the sole source
manufacturer for these upgrades to the existing system. The Boards of Directors
approved the plans and specifications for this project at their meeting of
October 22, 1997.
c MWp MM We den R.�WCLV572-0
R-. ,� Page 2
r
The Districts' Purchasing Manager negotiated and entered into a pricing agreement
with EST to assure the lowest possible pricing for the equipment. The negotiated
fire alarm equipment prices were incorporated into the Schedule of Prices submitted
by the bidders. The bidders were held to fixed fire alarm equipment costs and
competitively bid the installation and other necessary materials.
On November 18, 1997. two bid proposals were submitted. Both bids were over the
engineers estimate of$335,000. The low bid of$354,341.49 is $19,341.49 over the
engineers estimate. There are two items that attributed to the increase in the
construction cost: an increase in the number of devices and the contractors bond.
• After the engineers estimate was set, the number of fire detection and alarm
devices to be installed was increased by approximately 8% in the Schedule of
Prices at the request of the Construction Division. The value of this increase
is estimated at$9,000 (approximately 2-Y:% of the engineers estimate). This
request was made due to the fact that the number of installed devices is
subject to change during the review process for permits. The fire alarm
system will be permitted for each treatment plant based upon the installed
equipment. During the permitting process, changes in quantities and
locations can be made by the reviewing fire department. The additional
devices will accommodate minor increases in the number of devices
requested by the reviewing fire department.
• The second item that led to an increase in the construction cost is the
bonding requirement. The engineers estimate was determined, in part, upon
estimates provided during the design phase by an authorized installer of the
specified fire alarm equipment. This vendor was unaware of the Districts
bonding requirements, and thus, did not include the cost in their preliminary
estimates to provide bonding or the additional cost to team with another
contractor who is able to provide the bonding.
With the bids being over the engineers estimate and with a new overhead
calculation method, staff reviewed the entire project budget. Authorization for an
increase in the project budget by $53,000 for Job No. J-57 is requested. The
authorization request is for the following:
1. An increase in the project budget for project management staff costs due to a
new overhead calculation method. An additional $6,100.00 is requested for
project management.
2. An additional two weeks of training. The original training budget is necessary
for training on the EST3 Fire Alarm System. The additional training budget of
$9,800 is requested for training on the integration of the alarm graphics with
the CASI-RUSCO Security System.
3. An additional $19,341.49 over the engineers estimate is requested to fund
the constructon cost of$354,341.49.
G MipbGaNgmla DZT FeNuNM15]].BB.rce
R� +mm Page 3
4
4. Additional funding of$17,758.51 is requested as a contingency for the
project, which is estimated at approximately 5% of the construction cost.
Staff recommends award to the lowest bidder, First Fire System, Inc., for a total
amount not to exceed $354,341.49 and authorization of an increase in the project
budget by$53,000 bringing the project budget total from $507,000 to$560,000.
ALTERNATIVES
No altematives. The contract must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder to
accomplish the construction. The Districts' needs this project to bring the facilities
into compliance with fire codes.
CEQA FINDINGS
This project is exempt from CEQA requirements. A Notice of Exemption was filed on
March 17, 1993.
ATTACHMENTS
Budget Information Table
Bid Tabulation and Recommendation
Letter of Bid Protest
Letter of Withdrawal of Bid Protest
DALIWTS:jee
G RMN..eN'B. d Reµ.nVCN37 DBB.Cz
R,n..,, 1n Page 4
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Fire Alarm and Security System Upgrades
JOB NO. J-67
ORIGINAL . .CURRENT "PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK ADOPTED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION. 'TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE TO
BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%)
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT $ 17000.00 $ 17000.CO $ 6,10000 $ 23.100.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 6,100M $ 23100.00 $ 1000.00 6%
••FIBER OPTIC
INSTALLATION $ 133.000.00 $13300000 $ - S133,000.00 $ 133DW.00 $ - $ 133D00.00 $ 15000.00 11%
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT $ 335000.00 $33500000 $ 19,34149 $354,341.49 $ $ 354841.49 $ 354341.49 $ 0%
CONTINGENCY $ - $ $ 1775851 $ 17758.51 $ $ • $ - $ 0%
TRAINING $ 22,000.00 $ 22ODO.00 $ 9800.00 $ 31.800.00 $ 22000.00 $ 9.Ii0nA0 $ 31800.00 $ 200D.00 9%
TOTAL $ 507.000.00 $507.0)D.D0 $- 53,000.00 $560,000.00 $ 172.000.00 $ 370.241.49 $ 542,241.49 $ 18,00D.00 4%
'This budget increase request is for the coat of the construction contract over the original authorized budget amount of$335.000,a budget increase for project management
including overhead increases based on a new calculation method,an additional Mn weeks of training for integration of the fire alarm system wgh Bra security system,and a
contingency estimated at approdmately 5%of the construction coed.
The Iwallation of the fiber opgc network is being Implemented by the Information Technology Netwvrldng and Communications Division.
H.b p d1alenawn4U 5Aau0e0t are,Ws
November 18, 1997 `
11:00 a.m. V
BID TABULATION
JOB NO. J-57
PROJECT TITLE: FIRE ALARM AND SECURITY SYSTEM UPGRADES
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $335.000.00
TOTAL
CONTRACTOR BID
1. FIRST FIRE SYSTEMS $354,341.49
2. WEST STAR CONSTRUCTION $380,184.00
CORRECTED: $414,391.90
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible
bid. I,therefore, recommend award to First Fire S e , Inc. in the bid amount of $354,341.49 as
the lowest and best bid. WD,vid , P.E.
Director of Engineering
H:\W P.DTA%ENG1ENGU-571BIDTAB.SUM
CSDOC 9 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411
Flan:Je1Mr C.2iaeaamom To:WeoEy Se,eiuM pate:12 7 Tm :2:41:25 PM Pape 1 0l1
3911 LONGBEACNBLVD
LONG BEACH,CALIFORNIA 90807
PHONE:(562)424-3890
FAx:(562)424-2640
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
TUESDAY.DECEAmER 09, 1997
TO: COUNTY SANITATION DISTMCTSOF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAL6oRMA92728^_
ATTN: WENDY SEVENANDT
4tNA
: FIRE ALARM AND SECURITY SYSTEMS UPGRADES J-57
BID DATE: 11/18/97 ME: 11:00PM
DT,HAD SUBMITTED A LETTER OF PROTEST ON THE ABOVE REFERNCED PROJECT.
W OF DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY THE DISTRICT,WE HEREBY WITHDRAW OUR
ROTEST.
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FEEL FREE TO ODNTRACT US.
SINCERELY,
JEFFERY C.ZIMMERMANN
WEST STAR CONSTRUCTION
From'.Jeffery C.➢mmemvm To:Wendy S eand Date:1N 7Time:2:10:16 PM Pap 2012
1
3811 LONG BEACH BIw
LGNG BEACH,CALIFoHNIA90807
PHONE:(562)424-3890
FAx:(562)424-2640
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
NoVE ER20, 1997
TO: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
10944 ELLIS AVENUE _
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728
ATTN: CHUCK WINSOR
CE FIRE ALARM AND SECURITY SYSTEMS UPGRADES .1-57
BID DATE: 11/18/97 TQv1E: I1:00PM
SOR,
Aft HAD SUBMITTED A BID ON THE ABOVE REFERNCED PROJECT',IN WHICH WE
OT THE LOW SUCCESSFUL BIDDER.FIRST FIRE SYSTEMS WAS THE APPARENT LOW
DER. WEARESUBMIITINC THIS LETTER AS FORMAL LETTER OF PROTEST TO THE
AM LTTY OF THE LOW BIDDER TO COMPLY WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS ISSUED FOR THIS
PROJECT.WE QUESTION THE ABILITY OF THE LOW BIDDER TO BE AN"STRATEGIC
PARTNERS"WITH EDWARDS SYSTEMS AS PER SPECIFICATION SECTION 5G-9,PAGE 5. WE
HAVE LISTED GRINNEL FIRE SYSTEMS AS OUR QUAILFIED STRATEGIC PARTNER
PLEASE INFORM US OF THE RESULTS.
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FEEL FREE TO CONTRACT US.
SINCERELY,
JEFFERY C.ZIMMERMANN
WEST STAR CONSTRICTION
}g: f98i 1''ry'°:9g787� i, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Dam To IL M.
02/05/98 02/25/98
AGENDA REPORT I mNumDee 1 umbs
C 96-
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineers
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering upervisor
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
PLANNING FOR GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM
(formerly the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project- OCR)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve Amendment No. 1 to Orange County Water District (OCWD) and County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) Cooperative Agreement for Project
Planning for Groundwater Replenishment System.
SUMMARY
Amendment No. 1 provides continued support for the environmental and feasibility
studies now in progress and expands the authority of the Joint Cooperative Committee
to authorize expenditures of up to $50,000 from each agency
This item was unanimously approved by the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System
Cooperative Committee on January 27, 1998.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The original joint cost sharing agreement between CSDOC and OCWD provided for the
first year funding in the amount of$250,000 for each agency. Amendment No.1
provides continued funding support for project development as authorized by the Joint
Coordinating Committee (consisting of three directors from each agency). Total Phase I
development cost is estimated at $262 million.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: CORF c-9
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The Groundwater Replenishment System is a water reclamation project that the
CSDOC and OCWD have jointly studied for several years. The 1989 master plan
included $77 million for water reclamation, and this project is an element of the new
Strategic Plan under preparation. The FY 1997-98 CSDOC budget for the Groundwater
Replenishment System is $500,000, with expenditures to date of about$70,000.
Environmental, feasibility and public relations activities in progress will increase
expenditures in the second half of the fiscal year(but will not exceed budget authorization).
Amendment No. 1 provides for continued funding and makes other changes.
c vapmm+oa*•onn naoam`noac�vn.nv.w.«m<m,aQ ern
Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The existing agreement approved by CSDOC on February 26, 1997 provides for initial
cooperative sharing of project related costs in an amount not to exceed $250,000 each
(total $500,000). Under this agreement, the Joint Cooperative Committee was formed
to provide project oversight. To date, a staff prepared project report has been
completed, preliminary engineering and environmental compliance activities started, a
financial notebook has been developed, and a public relations program is underway.
The authorized funding levels for the first year will soon be reached. An amendment is
necessary to continue needed funding as provided for in the original cost sharing
agreement and to give the Joint Cooperative Committee greater authority to carry out
required activities.
Proposed Amendment No. 1 expands the power of the Joint Cooperative Committee to
authorize routine and budgeted GVJR System business. If Amendment No. 1 is
approved by the OCWD and CSDOC governing boards, the Joint Cooperative
Committee's approval of an item will authorize the two general managers to expend
funds, provided the following conditions are met; at least two (2) of the three (3)
directors from each agency approve the item, adequate funds are available in the
agency budget, and each authorization does not exceed $50,000 for each agency
($100,000 total). Approval of Amendment No. 1 would expedite the decision making
process, and provide for more efficient project development, as it would eliminate
further committee oversight from both agencies provided the above conditions. The
amendment also broadens the Joint Cooperative Committee's approval authority to
include items not mentioned in the original agreement, such as grant funding activities.
Since OCWD's fiscal year begins March 1, approval by the Boards in February is
recommended.
ALTERNATIVES
Stop project development.
CEQA FINDINGS
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is in progress.
ATTACHMENT
Draft Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement for Project Planning for
Groundwater Replenishment System.
G MpbbJ,�Onll P�p,laWpp[1M�ygsn MCMenI t Q¢yX
w...n 1� Page 2
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
' P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE,
ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Wednesday. February 11, 1998, 6:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on
Wednesday, February 11, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Committee Directors Present: Staff Present:
George Brown, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager
John J. Collins, Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Jan Debay Chris Dahl, Director of Information Technology
Barry Denes Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Norman Z. Eckenrode Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Mark Leyes Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services
Thomas R. Saltarelli Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
William G. Steiner Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Mike White, Controller
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Committee Directors Absent : Terri Josway, Safety& Emergency Response Mgr.
Lisa Loney, Human Resources Manager
John M. Gullixson Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary
Mark A. Murphy Ryal Wheeler, Maintenance & Operations Foreman
Other Directors Present: Others Present:
None Dani Spence, General Counsel
Mario Alvarado, Enterprise Technologies
Bob Lockhart, Revenue Enhancement
Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers
APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes January 21, 1998, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee were approved as drafted.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 2
February 11, 1998
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair had no report.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don McIntyre asked Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, to
update the Committee on the impact the recent heavy rains have had on the Districts' ability
to manage its biosolids. Ms. Wheatley updated the Committee and reviewed some of the
Districts' options, one of which would be to take the biosolids to locations in Arizona which
may cost the Districts an additional $12 to$20 per wet ton.
Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson advised that February, March and the early part
of April could be very wet months. If they are, we can expect serious increases in biosolids.
The Districts has a storage capacity of two weeks to a month. Staff will keep the Committee
and the Boards informed on this issue.
• General Manager Don McIntyre reported on the growing interest at the federal and state
levels in clean water, reclamation, and watershed management. Don felt because of this, the
Districts must include watershed management into our Strategic Plan.
• Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson updated the Committee on a report given to the
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee yesterday by Lester Snow, who is
heading up the Cal Fed process. Mr. Anderson advised that Cal Fed is expected to ask local
agencies to work on watershed issues.
• Mr. Anderson advised the Committee that the Operations staff did a great job handling the
excess Flows on Saturday. We experienced a peak flow of 450 mgd at midnight on Saturday.
We can handle up to 480 mgd fairly easily, and have been able to handle flows as high as
550 mgd. Mr. Anderson advised that timing is everything. We have been very lucky with the
time of day that the peak flows have been hitting us.
• Mr. Anderson reported on an issue which would be of interest to coastal cities regarding the
use of the Districts' 78-inch outfall. Up until yesterday, we were operating under the
assumption we would disinfect any discharge using the 78-inch outfall. However, at the
normal regulatory quarterly meeting yesterday, which Nancy Wheatley chairs, the Districts
found out that our new permit does not allow us to chlorinate due to possible environmental
damage. Members of all the regulatory agencies were at the meeting and agreed we will not
be allowed to chlorinate using the 78-inch outfall. The County Health Department will have to
post the beaches in the event that we do.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
• Director of Finance Gary Streed introduced Mario Alvarado, Principal of Enterprise
Technologies, and Dani Spence, of General Counsel Tom Woodruffs office.
• Mr. Streed reported that today interest rates were at 1% on the Districts' variable rate debt.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 5
February 11, 1998
General Manager Don McIntyre advised that there will be a budget session with the Board of
Directors on Saturday, May 9.
In response to Committee questions, Mr. McIntyre advised that staffing levels were projected
two years ago as a part of a Five-Year Staffing Plan. He agreed that those numbers can be
changed, but it would not take into account the fact that some of the vacancies may need to
be filled. During discussions with Department Heads and budget coordinators, it has been
noted that some positions may be more critical than others. Staff needs some flexibility in
staffing, in order to be able to respond to unforeseen situations, and to maintain the integrity
of the plants and health and safety of the public.
Some of the Committee members indicated concern about having too many positions in the
staffing projection than are really needed, and indicated that the budget should be managed
according to the plan without any surprises.
Mr. McIntyre advised the Committee that the Budget Assumptions would also be submitted to
the other two standing Committees for their review.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the 1998-99 Budget
Assumptions, Fiscal Polity Statements, and Budget Calendar, and direct staff to prepare the
1998-99 Budget incorporating these parameters.
7. FAHR98-05: Approve the substitution of Enterprise Technologies to replace J.D. Edwards
for the implementation portion only of Financial Information System
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Controller Mike White advised the Committee that this item has
been brought back to them at their request for additional information about the Financial
Information System project. A list of questions asked by the Committee at the January 21st
meeting was included in the agenda package, along with answers.
Mario Alvarado of Enterprise Technologies was introduced by Mike White, and answered
questions from the Committee regarding his background, education and experience in the
computer industry. Mr. Alvarado advised that he graduated UCLA, was working for a client of
J.D. Edwards for 5 years, and has been working as a consultant for the last three years both
with another business partner and by himself. His office is based in Irvine. Mr. Alvarado
advised that many people in the business branch out and provide consultant services on their
own and often group themselves with other consultants. This allows the customer to receive
better service with better talent for less money. He advised that he is still affiliated with J.D.
Edwards as an independent to do implementation services. It was noted that J.D. Edwards
is still under contract with the Districts as a software vendor and they will continue to do their
portion of the overall project. Mr. Alvarado advised that the talent for implementation projects
lies with consultants, not with the software vendor. Mr. Alvarado reviewed the scheduling
concems of the Committee, and advised them that his company is insured.
Staff reported to the Committee that the remaining time left on the contract would be for
approximately one year or more. June 30, 1999 is a target date, however, the system must
be integrated with the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). Delays in
the implementation of this phase will depend on the integration of these two systems. The
FIS system will be working after the next two modules are in place. The very easy to use
user interface will come later when the OneWorid conversion is in place.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 6
February 11, 1998
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and approved, with one nay vote, to recommend that the
Joint Boards approve the substitution of Enterprise Technologies to replace J D. Edwards for
the implementation portion only of the Financial Information System.
8. FAHR98-14: Modify the deferred compensation program for Executive Management,
Management, Supervisory, Professional and Confidential employees so that the incentive
compensation heretofore called "employer matching" and "employer non-matching
contributions" be designated as supplemental salary, a part of the total remuneration paid to
the employee (All Districts).
Director John Collins (JC) requested that his abstention from discussion or voting on this
matter be made a matter of record, as well as his absence from the conference room during
the Committee's consideration of this item.
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: General Manager Don McIntyre advised that the Committee
Chair requested that this item be brought back for their reconsideration of modifications to the
Districts Deferred Compensation program which would allow the Districts to maintain current
retirement benefits and be in compliance with the Venture ruling. The changes would be 1) a
non-substantive olarificetion of language, and 2) removal of the vesting provision. Mr.
McIntyre described the impact on the change in retirement benefits for approximately 175
current employees if the proposed changes are not made. He also reviewed the historical
background of the Districts' Deferred Compensation program and the vesting provisions. Mr.
McIntyre noted that the recommended changes will not provide additional benefits to Districts'
employees, but merely retains what they have granted through the M.O.U. process since
1985.
During discussion, some of the Directors agreed that whether it is right or wrong, it has been
past practice to include the benefit in eamable wages, it would not be adding a benefit, and
not approving the proposed Resolution would be reducing a benefit already given. Further,
the Ventura ruling has not been tested in court, and is not entirely clear at this point.
Some Directors opposed including a benefit in eamable compensation figures, and felt that
unless the money was included in take-home pay, it should not be considered as such. Also,
staff should survey other public agencies to determine how many include these benefits in
eamable compensation figures, since this was reported to not be a practice in the private
sector.
Discussion took place regarding the vesting provisions of the Districts' program. Some of the
Directors observed that eliminating the vesting would allow an employee to work for the
Districts a very short time and then take the share contributed by the Districts with them when
they leave.
Dam Spence, General Counsel's office, tried to clarify some of the issues under discussion
relating to the Districts' Deferred Compensation Plan, employee benefits and the Venture
ruling. She clarified for the Committee that continuing to include vesting requirements in the
Districts' program would be in violation of the Ventura ruling and would probably result in IRS
violations in the year of vesting.
MOTION No. 1: It was moved, seconded and duly carried, with 5 Ayes, and 3 Nays, to
recommend that the Joint Boards approve Resolution No. XX, Approving Revisions to the
Deferred Compensation Program for the Executive Management Group Employees (General
Manager, Assistant General Managers and Department Heads) and Management,
Supervisory, Professional and Confidential Employees of the Districts, and Repealing
Resolution No. 95-81.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 7
February 11, 1998
r
MOTION NO. 2: It was moved; seconded and duly carried to change the language of
Resolution No. XX, clarifying the application of the provisions to current employees only. This
motion is tentative, depending on legal counsel's opinion on prospective application only.
9. FAHR98-15: Review and approve the 1997-98 Financial and Operational Report for the
Period ended December 31, 1997, and forward to the Joint Boards
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Controller Mike White presented an overview of the Financial
areas of the report. This is the third year this report has been presented in this format, and
includes a comprehensive review of all the financial aspects of the Districts, as well as an
operational review. It includes the Operating Fund Review, Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
Review, Individual District Review, Self-Insurance Review and Operational Review. As of
December 31, 1997, costs per million gallons were at$469. Total Joint Operating Expenses
were $24.4 million or 2.7% below budget. Mr. White provided a comparison of the first
quarter and second quarter, summarizing increased costs in chemicals, research, repair
materials, payroll and other; an increase of$2.2 million over the first quarter. Mr. While
noted that despite increases in some of these categories, the Districts is expected to be
within budget at the end of the fiscal year.
After a brief discussion regarding the projection for costs per million gallon, the Committee
expressed its appreciation to Mr. White for the time and effort involved in preparing this
report.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the 1997-98 Financial and
Operational Report for the period ended December 31, 1997, and forward to the Joint Boards
INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
10. FAHR98-16: Review of Districts'Travel Policy (All Districts).
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Gary Streed advised that there was a discussion at the
December Board Meeting regarding a travel request by an employee who was going to
Singapore, and an offer by the employee that the Districts pay only the registration portion,
and not the air fare. The Board, after discussion, approved payment for the entire travel,just
as we do for other business travel. After the meeting, two of the Directors asked that the
travel policy be placed on the next FAHR agenda. Mr. Streed stated that his staff report
includes the policy. The intent of having this on the Committee agenda is to avoid having a
discussion at the Board level, and to clarify the policy which applies to all instances.
Mr. Streed explained that the travel request taken to the Boards was because the Districts'
polity is that all travel out of the country must be approved by the full Boards. The portion to
be paid by the Districts was not the reason for the item being placed on the agenda.
CLOSED SESSION
The Chair reported the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section
54956.9, to discuss and consider the item specified under"Closed Session"as Item 12(a) on the
published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 7:45 p.m.
No action was taken re Agenda Item 12(a).
At 7:58 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee i
Page 8
February 11, 1998
9
Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been prepared in
accordance with California Government Code Section 549057.2, and are maintained by the
Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Meetings.
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
None.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
None.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
None.
FUTURE MEETING DATES
The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for
Wednesday, March 11, 1998, at 5:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:59 p.m.
Submitted by:
L n ra Crane
Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee Secretary
\ i DONOATA7\WP.DTAT NQ1 MCRAN EWAHRTAH Rs8TEM2-98MIN.DOC
FAHIR COMMITTEE Nt'I'IWaze 0OZ12 s.
07/11/96 02/25/98
AGENDA REPORT item Number Rem Number
i" /le,
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for the month of January 1998
(All Districts)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of January 1998.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), has served as the Districts'
professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust as the Districts' third-
party custodian, since September 1995.
The Districts' Investment Policy, adopted by the Joint Boards, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly
Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating
Monies." The Districts' external money manager is operating in compliance with
the requirements of the Districts' Investment Policy. The Districts' portfolio
contains no reverse repurchase agreements.
Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as
estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused
by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
R.wPft N1V AHWMR�AHRY0
R.a.e: imrror Page 1
r
a
f
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-
term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted
investment portfolio transactions for the month of January 1998 is attached. The
attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting
enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market
values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon
Trust, the Districts' custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions
that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected.
The Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted
Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient
funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure
requirements for the next six months.
The table below details the book balances of the Districts'funds at month-end. A
graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar
chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Accounts January 31, 1998 Yield (%)
Slate of Calif. LAIF $11,502,926 5.7
Union Bank Checking Account 381,626 5.0
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,810.000 5.1
Bank of America Checking Account 74.504 4.3
Bank of America Money Market Account 128.268 4.0
PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 17,474.833 5.4
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 290,050,681 5.5
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 684 5.6
Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 33,064,740 6.2
Petry Cash 4.400 —
Deferred Compensation 11,673.646 3.51 -29.78
TOTAL S3fiS.6B8 308
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
H.1 .aaMnrtleannoWAHa1FAHHB EBTAHRY6a9..0
Rw 1QW4o Page 2
A
9
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Reports
GGS:SK:lc
Htvry.J YIn MMnOWAHRTAHR0 MWAHRBB dM
ReK ,mnre, Page 3
MonthlyPrepared by Finance, 2/IW98,4:13 PM
Report
• Balances
11 1 . 1 111
'. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �.�����.�� i�.�.�.0� ���������1 ���������� 1�.11�.�.� i•.•.•.•.1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ti i�i���i i�i i�i�i� �iiiii ii�i i�i�i >��������� •���������
i�0i�i'0 lOi�i00 i�d000 i�i�i�0i1 ♦�••� !•••
1
Dec,
IS • - • -Short-term 0 Debt Service Reserves 11 LAIF
0 Deferred Compensation p Bank Accts 0 Petty - .ea Dist 11 GO Bond Fund
MONTHLY REPORT + .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 January 1998)
Liquid Operating Monies
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
pp���� $17571,251
Mellon0 $17:474,833
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $20,996,989
Mellon $17,501,362
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.20
Of Index:
0.20
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss) of 1%Change: $35,381 (0.20°/")
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 81%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: °AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return (°/n):
1 Month: 0.46
3 Months: 1.40
12 Months: 5.62
Year-to-Date: 0.46
Index Total Rate of Return(%):
1 Month: 0.44
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
7NVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 January 1998)
Long Term Operating Monies
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: $ 9 3 p
MEW $290, 50,681
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $374,679,903
Mellon $380,089,160
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.47
Of Index. 2.32
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss) of 1%Change: $7,520,773
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (%)
1 Month: 1.11
3 Months: 2.15
12 Months: 8.57
Year-to-Date: 1.11
Index Total Rate of Return: (%)
1 Month: 1.17
A
OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST -,
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE USD
31-IAN-1998 HB1100
% OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ -------
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 3,400,000.40 3,400,000.40 19.22% 0.00 0.00 0.00
PAYABLES -3,425,733.34 -3,425,733.34 -19.37% 0.00 0.00 0.00
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,380,466.89 2,380,466.89 13.46% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3 157,099.33 3,157,099.33 VAN 0.00 0.00 0.00
FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 3:084,637.72 3,084,637.72 17.44% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 2 371 818.00 2,371,818.00 13.41% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 2:961:801.67 2.961,801.67 16.74% 0.00 0.00 0.00
BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 161,742.00 161,742.00 0.91% 0.00 6,065.33 3.75
__________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______
TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,091,832.67 14,091,832.67 79.66% 0.00 6,06S.33 0.D4
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,383,796.88 3,383,000.00 19.12% -796.88 161,500.00 4.77
__________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,383,796.88 3,383,000.00 19.12% -796.88 161,500.00 4.77
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 215,324.69 215,324.69 1.22% 0.00 0.00 0.00
__________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 21S,324.69 215,324.69 1.22% 0.00 0.00 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 17,690,954.24 17.690,157.36 100.00% -796.88 167,565.33 OAS
Page 1
OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-IAN-1998 HB1100
% OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 0.92 0.92 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00
RECEIVABLES 7,324,76S.63 7,324,76S.63 2.40% 0.00 0.00 0.00
PAYABLES -91,730,959.53 -91,730,9S9.53 -30.12% 0.00 0.00 0.00
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - DOME 13,494,27S.00 13,S09,538.02 4.44% 15,263.02 803,250.00 5.95
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 694,49S.GS 694,495.6S 0.23% 0.00 0.00 0.00
BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 483,773.00 483,773.00 0.16% 0.00 18,141.49 3.75
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS -69,733r649.33 -69.718,386.31 -22.89% 15,263.02 821,391.49 -1.18
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 182 884,467.42 184,187 241.82 60.47% 1,302,774.40 11,793,045.58 6.40
U.S. AGENCIES 112:323,654.05 113,027:095.50 37.11% 703,441.4S 7,257,790.00 6.42
GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 18 233,518.86 18,316,704.9E 6.01% 83,186.09 1,230,79S.36 6.72
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGA 3:492,480.47 3,508,526.70 1.1S% 16 046.23 216,650.00 6.17
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 536,475.56 538,724.48 0.18% 2:249.92 33,261.49 6.17
BANKING & FINANCE 37,010,379.77 36,999,439.32 12.IS% -1O 94045 2,383 510.93 6.44
INDUSTRIAL 10,935,640.00 10,516,100.00 3.45% -419:540:00 909:400.00 8.65
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 365,416,616.13 367,093,832.77 120.53% 1,677,216.64 23,824,4S3.36 6.49
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 7,19S,696.41 7,195,696.41 2.36% 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 7,195,696.41 7,195,696.41 2.36% 0.00 0.00 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 302�878,663.21 n 304,571,142.87 100.00% 1.692,479 66 24,645,844.85 8.09
Page 1 v
YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 1
OCSF07S11IO2 1998/01/31 RUN DATE t 02/05/98
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t 15.52.51
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ....... ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
CASH L CASH EQUIVALENTS
161,742.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 161,742.00 1.14
999495906 PUBLIC II 161,742.00 .92
3,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 5.413 .000 P-1 99.581 2,987,423.33 21.16
313509SI7 MAT 02/12/1990 2,987,423.33 17.07
600,D00.OD FORD MTR CA CO DISC 5.501 .000 P-1 99.43E 795,502.44 5.63
34539UBLS 02/20/1998 795,502.44 4.55
800,000.00 FLORIDA PNR CORP DISC 5.503 .000 P-1 99.392 795,137.76 5.63
34110BBH3 02/17/1998 795,237.78 4.54
800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.520 .000 98,720 789,826.67 5.59
36959JDNO 04/22/1990 789,826.67 4.51
3,000,000.00 FED FARM CA OK CONS DISC NTS 5.527 .000 P-1 98.727 2,961,801.67 20.97
313313VQS MAT 04/16/1998 2,961,801.67 16.92
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 5.555 .000 P-1 98.626 2,371,818.DO 16.00
315385SPZ MAT 02/02/1998 2,371,816.00 13.55
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 5.605 .000 P-1 99,664 2,367,926.00 16.77
313391TH4 MAT 02/20/1998 2,367,926.00 13.53
100,000.0E FEDERAL MAIL MTG ASSN DISC 5.668 .000 P-1 97.214 97,214.39 .68
3135B9YG2 MAT 06/19/1998 97,214.39 .56
800,000.00 FEDERAL ROME LN MTG CORP DISC 5.677 .ODO P-1 98.647 789,173.33 5.59
313597UT6 MAT 03/26/1998 789,173.33 4.51
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE : 2
OCSF07511102 1998/01/31 RUN DATE f 02/05/98
ORANOE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 15.52.51
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOM YIELD RATIND PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL
TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.360 .078 14,117,565.62 100.00
14:117,565.61 60.66
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.402 4.774 AAA 99.SD0 3,383,796.86 100.00
912827M66 04.7502 10/31/19" DD 11/02/93 3,383,000.00 19.33
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.402 4.774 S,3B3.796.88 100.00
3,303,000.00 19.33
TOTAL 5.381 .274 17,301,362.49 100.00
17,500,565.61 100.00
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 3
OCSF07522202 1998/01/31 RUN DATE i 02/05/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 15.52.51
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL
CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS
483,773.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 483,773.00 3.29
999495906 PUBLIC II 483,773.00 .13
300,00D.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.479 .000 P-1 98.931 296,793.17 2.02
63743DO73 04/07/1998 296,793.27 .08
100,00D.00 DU PONT BE NEMOUR DISC 5.501 .ODD P-1 99.438 99,437.81 .67
26354BC59 03/05/1990 99,437.81 .03
300,000.00 AMERICAN TEL A TL DISC 5.512 .000 P-1 99.422 298,264.67 2.03
0301OBCCI 03/12/1998 298,264.67 .08
13,500,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 5.994 5.946 100.071 13,494,275.00 91.97
0663JOKU7 05.950% 06/19/1998 00 06/19/97 13,509,538.02 3.54
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.131 4.964 14,672,543.65 100.00
14,687,806.67 3.86
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
4,000,000.00 FORD MR CR MTN TRANCHE RTR 96 .000 S.633 Al 100.298 3,970,480.00 1.09
3454D2DZ1 FLTG/RT 11/09/199A DO 11/08/93 4,011,920.00 1.05
7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR A 00177 .000 5.516 Al 99.718 6,999,748.00 1.92
3454D2HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 7,079,978.00 1.85
7,058,940.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.654 3.641 AAA .99.562 7,049,907.63 1.91
9128273AS 3.625K 07/15/2002 OR 07/14/97 7,028,021.04 1.84
10,193,600.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.735 3.449 AAA 97.644 9,914,073.18 2.71
9128272M3 3.3752 01/15/2007 OR 01/15/97 9,973,825.98 2.61
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE s 4
MSF07522202 1998/01/31 RIM DATE 02/05/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATING RUN TIME s 15.52.51
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.430 6.730 AAA 111.437 17,925,000.00 4.85
912827S86 07.500% OZ/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 17,829,920.00 4.67
15,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.562 5.857 AAA 100.312 15,045,117.19 4.09
912827Z70 05.875% 10/31/1998 OD 10/31/96 15,046,800.00 3.94
52,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.627 6.724 AM 102.250 53,883,310.97 14.70
912827RZD 06.875% 06/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 53,980,000.00 14.14
3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.341 AM 104.484 3,623,203.13 .99
9128272SO 06.6257. 04/30/2002 DD 04/30/97 3,656,940.00 .96
27,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.828 7.007 AAA 107.031 29,002,230.55 7.98
912827025 07.500% 11/15/2001 OD 11/15/91 29,526,494.00 7.68
2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONGS 5.857 6.584 MA 132.891 2,663,639.50 .72
912SIODYI 08.7507. 06/15/2017 DD 05/15/87 2,657,820.00 .70
5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN MTH 5.871 5.849 AAA 100.531 51000,781.25 1.36
31364FFM8 5.880% 11/03/1999 OD 11/03/97 5,026,550.00 1.32
4,140,142.80 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-9 CL A 5.957 5.895 AAA 100.DB5 4,131,571.42 1.12
161614AE2 5.9007. 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 4,143,661.92 1.09
28,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.041 6.243 AAA 104.109 28,530,929.96 7.94
9128272MI 06.580% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 29,150,520.00 7.64
10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO MR FNMA 6.076 6.172 AAA 100.438 10,071,875.00 2.73
999ABY856 6.1997. 02/25/2028 10,043,750.00 2.63
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.162 8.778 AAA 126.734 6,233,593.75 1.72
912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DD 07/OS/63 6,336,700.00 1.66
$36,475.57 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.174 AM 100.419 536,475.56 .14
31677EAM 6.2007. 09/01/20DI RD 03/15/96 536,724.48 .14
3,500,000.00 CONTIMORTGAGE NONE EQ 96-4 A3 6.213 6.175 AM 10D.244 3,492,460.47 .95
23075NOKB 6.190X 10/15/2011 OD 11/23/96 3,508,526.70 .92
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.277 6.070 MA 102.969 4,994,531.25 1.40
9128272LS 06.250% B2/28/2002 DD 02/28/97 5,148,450.00 1.35
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL KTG ASSN MTN 6.291 6.086 AM 102.359 41400,705.00 1.25
31364CKV5 6.230% 05/01/2002 OD 03/03/97 4,606,155.00 1.21
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5
OCSF07522202 1998/01/31 RUN DATE : 02/05/98
ORANGE CTY-LDNG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 15.52.51
PAR VALUE YIM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE
SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ .--------_
39,600,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN BK CONS BPS 6.505 6.485 MA .100.078 39,890,500.00 10.79
3133915B6 6.490% 09/13/2000 DO 09/13/95 39,630,886.00 16.38
1,000,006.00 SEARS ROEBUCK NTN R TR 00491 6.305 7.681 A2 100.121 1,031,860.00 .27
812UXUJS 7.690% OU27/1998 OD OV28/95 1,001,210.00 .26
4,500,000.00 CATERPILLAR FINL MTNS TR00389 6.322 5.781 A2 99.978 4,466,745.00 1.22
14912LSE2 8.780% 07/15/1998 DO 12/15/95 4,499,010.00 1.18
5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS RLUGS MTN 000196 6.364 6.555 BAA1 101.453 5,039,450.00 1.35
52517PJ04 6.6502 11/08/2000 DD 11/08/96 5,072,650.00 1.33
4,38S,249.35 GNMA II POOL 90080023 6.375 6.354 AAA 102.297 4,460,926.72 1.22
36225CAZ9 6.506% 12/20/2026 00 12/01/96 4,489,046.41 1.18
1,305,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC SR NTS 6.425 6.607 A2 102.168 1,317,619.35 .36
07390ZAM8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DD 04/26/96 1,333,292.40 .35
1,000,000.00 CHRYSLER F1NL NTH TR 8 00335 6.514 6.244 A3 100.262 993,160.00 .27
17120QPYI 6.260% 01/20/1998 DO 07/18/95 1,002,620.00 .26
3,700,000.00 GENERAL MIRS ACCEP MTN TROB324 6.532 0.166 A3 102.559 319111640.00 1.03
37042RPHO 8.375% 02/03/1999 DD 0/03/95 3,794,683.00 .99
8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MG ASSN MTN 6.577 6.410 AAA 103.359 8,012,576.00 2.25
31364CBD9 6.6257. 04/15/2001 DO 04/18/96 8,268,720.00 2.17
2,900,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR R 00306 6.591 7.247 A3 100.316 2,952,896.00 .79
17120QNT4 7.2702 04/13/2998 OD 04/13/95 2190911".00 .76
9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS HT 6.593 8.749 A2 105.721 9,903,780.00 2.59
718154BBZ 9.2507. OVIS12000 9,514,890.00 2.49
10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL RIG ASSN MTN 6.636 5.690 AAA 99.125 9,593,750.00 2.70
31364BKF3 5.6402 OU20/2001 OD 02/20/96 9,912,500.00 2.60
3,000,000.00 G N A C NED TERM NTS 6.660 8.208 AS 205.082 3,227,070.00 .85
37042RKQ4 8.6252 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95 3,152,460.00 .83
5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBS 6.713 6.038 AAA 99.203 4,651,562.50 1.35
3154ADWS 5.990% 03/06/2001 OD 05/06/96 4,960.150.00 1.30
27,250,000.00 COMMIT TO MR FRLMC 6.71E 6.865 AAA 101.968 27,616,875.00 7.56
999ABV357 7.000% O2/15/2008 27,786,280.00 7.28
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6
OCSF07522202 1998/01/51 RUN DATE i 02/05/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 15.52.51
PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOM YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
5,260,572.79 GNMA II POOL 00008747 6.728 6.838 AAA 102.375 5,357,564.60 1.46
3620UW86 7.000X 11/20/2025 DO 11/01/95 51385,511.39 1.41
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PAR FHLMC 6.812 6.8% AAA 301.531 2,797,029.30 .76
999ABY880 7.060X 02/OI/2028 2,792,102.50 .73
5,764,4SS.41 GNMA II POOL 8080088" 6.828 6.841 AAA 102.328 51890,555.95 1.60
36225CC2O 7.00OX 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 5,890,655.00 1.55
2,482,957.64 GNMA II POOL 90008684 6.865 6.B33 AAA 102.438 2,524,469.59 .69
36202KUH6 7.009X 08/20/20ZS OD 08/01/95 2,543,492.15 .67
2,500,000.00 U 5 TREASURY BONDS 6.906 8.192 AAA 161.750 4,029,030.31 1.10
912810DA 13.250X OS/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 4,043,750.00 1.06
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.475 6.327 365,426,616.13 100.00
367,093,832.77 96.18
________ _______ ----------------- ---------
TOTAL 5.475 6.324 380,089,159.78 100.D0
381,781,639.44 100.00
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 26-JAN-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
912810DJ4 U S TREASURY BONDS ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 13.250% 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 21-JAN-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
91281ODYI U S TREASURY BONDS ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
cw 08.750% OS/15/2017 DO 05/15/87 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 12-JAN-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
912827R20 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 16-JAN-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
912827ZX3 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
cW 07.750% 02/15/2001 DO 02/15/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 26-JAN-1998 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
9128272W1 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 06.S00% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PURCHASES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 26-JAN-1998 -99,437.81 -99,437.81 99.437805
26354BC59 03/05/1998 27-JAN-1998 99,437.81 99,437.81 99.437805
B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 26-JAN-1998 -99,437.81 -99,437.81 99.437805
26354BC59 03/05/1998 27-3AN-1998 -99,437.81 0.00 99.437805
FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 27-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NTS 20-JAN-1998 -2,961,801 67 -2 961 801.67 98.726722
313313VQ8 MAT 04/16/1998 20-3AN-1998 2.961,801:67 2:961:801.67 98.726722
B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 1
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,000.000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NTS 20-JAN-1998 -2,961,801.67 -2,961,801.67 98.726722
313313VQ8 MAT 04/16/1998 20-JAN-1998 -2,961,801.67 0.00 98.726722
FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. NY 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 21-JAN-1998 -499,849.44 -499,849.44 99.969888
313397SD4 MAT 01/23/1998 21-JAN-1998 499,849.44 499,849.44 99.969888
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 21-JAN-1998 -499,849.44 -499,849.44 99.969898
313397SD4 MAT 01/23/1998 21-3AN-1998 -499,849.44 0.00 99.969888
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 21-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC IS-JAN-1998 -2 987,423.33 -2,987,423.33 99.580778
313589SZ7 MAT 02/12/1998 15-JAN-1998 2:987,423.33 2,987,423.33 99.580778
B MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,000 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 15-JAN-1998 -2,987,423 33 -2,997,423.33 99.580778
31i589SZ7 MAT 02/12/1998 15-3AN-1998 -2,987,423:33 0.00 99.580778
FC MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 08-JAN-1998 -795,137.78 -795,137.78 99.392222
3411OBBH3 02/17/1998 08-JAN-1998 795,137.78 795,137.78 99.392222
B FIRST CHICAGO CAPITAL MARKETS, ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 08-JAN-1998 -795,137.78 -795,137.78 99.392222
34110BBH3 02/17/1998 08-JAN-1998 -795,137.78 0.00 99.392222
FC FIRST CHICAGO CAPITAL MARKETS, 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 16-JAN-1998 -299,68325 -299,683.25 99.894416
34539UAP7 01/23/1998 16-JAN-1998 299,683:25 299,683.25 99.894416
B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 16-JAN-1998 -299,683.25 -299,683.25 99.894416
Page 2
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
34539UAP7 01/23/1998 16-JAN-1998 -299,683.25 0.00 99.894416
FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 16-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 14-JAN-1998 -795,502.44 -795,502.44 99.437805
34539UBL5 02/20/1998 14-JAN-1998 795,502.44 795,502.44 99.43780S
B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 14-JAN-1998 -795,502.44 -795,502.44 99.437805
34539UBL5 02/20/1998 14-JAN-1998 -795,502.44 0.00 99.437805
FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 14-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 14-JAN-1998 -399,449.00 -399,449.00 99.862250
36959JAP8 01/23/1998 14-JAN-1998 399,449.00 399,449.00 99.862250
B MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 14-JAN-1998 -399,449.00 -399,449.00 99.862250
36959JAP8 01/23/1998 14-JAN-1998 -399,449.00 0.00 99.862250
FC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 14-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 28-JAN-1998 -789,826.67 -789,826.67 99.728334
36959JDNO 04/22/1998 28-JAN-1998 789,826.67 789,826.67 98.728334
B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 28-JAN-1998 -789,826.67 -789,826.67 98.728334
36959JDNO 04/22/1998 28-JAN-1998 -789.826.67 0.00 98.728334
FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 28-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 23-JAN-1998 -296,793.17 -296,793.17 98.931055
63743DD73 04/07/1998 26-JAN-1998 296,793.17 296,793.17 98.931055
e LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 23-JAN-1998 -296,793.17 -296,793.17 98.931055
63743DD73 04/07/1998 26-JAN-1998 -296,793.17 0.00 98.931055
FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 26-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 3
OCSGOOOIOO MELLON TRUST
CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
334,743.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 15-JAN-1998 -334,743.00 -334 743.00 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT 00 06/26/1997 15-JAN-1998 334,743.00 334:743.00 1.000000
B 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
154,018.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-JAN-1998 -154,018.00 -1S4,018.00 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 16-JAN-1998 1S4,018.00 154,018.00 1.000000
B 16-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
572.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-JAN-1998 -S72.00 -S72.00 1.000000
99949S906 PUBLIC II 02-JAN-1998 572.00 572.00 1.000000
B 02-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,862.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 08-JAN-1998 -4,862.00 -4,862.00 1.000000
99949S906 PUBLIC II 08-JAN-1998 4,862.00 4,862.00 1.000000
B 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
48,268.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 08-JAN-1998 -48 26800 -48,268.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 08-JAN-1998 48:268:00 48,268.00 1.000000
B 08-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
64,508.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 09-JAN-1998 -64,SO8.00 -64,508.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC Ix 09-JAN-1998 64,508.00 64,508.00 1.000000
B 09-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
4,498.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 14-JAN-1998 -4,498.00 -4,498.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 14-JAN-1998 4,498.00 4,498.00 1.000000
B 14-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
336,960.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 15-3AN-1998 -336,960.00 -336,960.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 15-3AN-1998 336,960.00 336,960.00 1.000000
B 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
163,040.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 16-JAN-1998 -163,040.00 -163,040.00 1.000000
_-.. _ Page 4 a ..
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST -
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
999495906 PUBLIC II 16-JAN-1998 163,040.00 163,040.00 1.000000
B 16-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
38 199.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 20-JAN-1998 -38.199.00 -38,199.00 1.000000
996495906 PUBLIC II 20-JAN-1998 38,199.00 38,199.00 1.000000
B 20-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,070,703.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 20-JAN-1998 -3,070,703.00 -3,070,703.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 20-JAN-1998 3,070,703.00 3,070,703.00 1.000000
B 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
199,090.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 23-JAN-1998 -199,090.00 -199,090.00 1.000000
99949S906 PUBLIC II 23-JAN-1998 199,090.00 199,090.00 1.000000
B 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
10 173.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 28-JAN-1998 -10,173.00 -10,173.00 1.000000
994495906 PUBLIC II 28-JAN-1998 10,173.00 10,173.00 1.000000
B 28-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,482,957.64 GNMA II POOL #0008684 30-JAN-1998 -2,524,469.59 -2,524,469.59 101.671875
36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DD 08/01/95 24-FEB-1998 2,S24,469.59 2,524.469.59 101.671875
8 BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,482,957.64 GNMA II POOL #0008684 30-JAN-1998 -11,104.34 -11,104.34 101.671875
36202KUH6 7.000% 08/20/2025 DO 08/01/95 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 101.671875
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,260,572.79 GNMA 11 POOL #0008747 21-JAN-1998 -5,357,564.60 -5,357,564.60 101.8437SO
36202KWG6 6.875% 11/20/2025 DO 11/01/95 24-FEB-1998 S,357,564.60 5,357,564.60 101.843750
B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,260,572.79 GNMA II POOL #0008747 21-JAN-1998 -23,526.45 -23,526.45 101.843750
36202KWG6 6.875% 11/20/2025 DO 11/01/95 24-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 101.843750
Ig ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 5
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2.500.000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 22-JAN-1998 -4.020,170 00 -4 020,170.00 160.806800
9128lOD74 13.250% OS/15/2014 OD 05/15/84 20-MAR-1998 4.020,170:00 4:020,170.00 160.906800
B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC. NV ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500 000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 22-3AN-1998 -114.381.91 -114,381.91 160.806800
9H810034 13.2SO% 05/15/2014 DO 05/lS/84 20-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 160.806800
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 22-JAN-1998 -4.037,890.63 -4 037 890.63 161.515625
912810D74 13.250% 05/15/2014 00 05/15/84 23-JAN-1998 4,037,890.63 4:037:890.63 161.515625
8 FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 22-JAN-1998 -63,138.81 -63,138.81 161.515625
912810034 13.250% 05/15/2014 DD 05/15/84 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 161.515625
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2.500 000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 22-JAN-1998 -4,101,029.44 -4.101,029.44 161.S1S625
91f810D74 13.250% OS/15/2014 DD 05/15/84 23-JAN-1998 -4,101,029.44 0.00 161.515625
PC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-1998 -2,669,375.00 -2,669,375.00 133.468750
912810ov1 08.750% 05/15/2017 DD 05/15/87 20-3AN-1998 2,669,375.00 2,669,375.00 133.468750
8 FIRST BOSTON CORP. NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-2998 -31,906.08 -31,906.08 133.4687SO
912830DY1 08.750% 05/15/2017 DD 05/15/87 20-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 133.468750
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-3AN-1998 -2,701,281.08 -2,701,281.08 133.468750
912SIODYI 08.7SD% OS/15/2017 DD 05/15/87 20-7AN-1998 -2,701,281.08 0.00 133.468750
FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 6
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1998 - 31-TAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
2,000 000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-1998 -2,657,904.00 -2,657,904.00 132.895200
91f810DY1 08.750% 05/15/2017 DO 05/15/87 13-MAR-1998 2,657,904.00 2,657,904.00 132.895200
B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
2,000 000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-1998 -57,044.20 -57,044.20 132.895200
91H10DY1 08.750% 05/15/2017 DO OS/15/87 13-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 132.895200
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
24,800 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-NOV-1997 -2S,8S2,069.16 -25,852,069.16 101.754300
91f827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO O8/31/94 09-JAN-1998 -2S,8S2,069.16 0.00 101.754300
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 09-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
24,700 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES O8-JAN-1998 -25,274 694.90 -25,274,694.90 102.326700
91f827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 13-FEB-2998 25,274:694.90 25,274.694.90 102.326700
B FIRST BOSTON CORP. NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
24,700 000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES O8-JAN-1998 -778,698.21 -778,698.21 102.326700
911827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO O8/31/94 13-FEB-1998 0.00 0.00 102.326700
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
16,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 14-JAN-1998 -17,925,000.00 -17 925 000.00 112.031250
M827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/9S 1S-3AN-1998 17,925,000.00 17:925:000.00 112.031250
B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
16,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 14-JAN-1998 -498,913.04 -498,913.04 112.031250
M827586 07.S00% 02/15/2005 DD 02/1S/95 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 112.031250
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
16,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 14-JAN-1998 -18,423,913 04 -18,423,913.04 112.031250
M827586 07.500% 02/15/2005 DO 02/15/95 15-JAN-1996 -18,423,913:04 0.00 112.031250
FC LEHMAN BROS INC 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,099 750.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1997 -4,966,678 40 -4 966 678.40 97.390625
9U8272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO O1/15/97 02-3AN-1998 4,966,678:40 4:966:678.40 97.390625
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
--- Pa0e 7
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-3AN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
S,099,750.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1997 -79,978.08 -79,978.08 97.39062S
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 02-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 97.390625
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
S,099,750.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 31-DEC-1997 -5.046,656.48 -5,046,656.48 97.390625
9128272N3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 02-JAN-1998 -5.046,656.48 0.00 97.390625
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 02-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,099,150.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 07-JAN-1998 -4,952,549.44 -4.952,549.44 97.125000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 08-JAN-1998 4,952.549.44 4,952,549.44 97.125000
B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- - 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,099,150.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 07-JAN-1998 -82,774.59 -82,774.59 97.125000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 97.125000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,099,150.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 07-JAN-1998 -5,035,324.03 -5,035,324.03 97.125000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 08-JAN-1998 -5,035,324.03 0.00 97.125000
FC LEHMAN BROS INC 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-1997 -3,732,871.89 -3,732,871.89 102.726600
9126272w1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 23-3AN-1998 -3,732,871.99 0.00 102.726600
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JAN-1998 -2,705,549.60 -2,705,549.60 104.059600
9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 13-MAR-1998 2,705,549.60 2,705,549.60 104.059600
B BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JAN-1998 -47.821.43 -47,821.43 104.059600
9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 13-MAR-1998 0.00 0.00 104.OS9600
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 8
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TMI00
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________
10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 20-NOV-1997 -9,978,12S.00 -9,978,125.00 99.781250
999AA6619 6.170% 01/25/2028 27-JAN-1998 -9,978,12S.00 0.00 99.781250
FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 27-7AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 29-OCT-1997 -7,243,203.13 -7,243,203.13 99.906250
999ABT444 7.000% 01/15/2028 14-JAN-1998 -7,243,203.13 0.00 99.906250
FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
2,750'000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 -2,7SS,1S6.25 -2,7S5,156.25 100.187500
999ABT444 7.000% 01/15/2028 14-7AN-1998 -2,755,156.2E 0.00 100.187500
FC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 14-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PER FHLMC 22-JAN-1998 -20 312,S00.00 -20,312,500.00 101.562500
999ABV357 7.000% 02/15/2008 23-FEB-1998 20:312,500.00 20,312,SOO.00 101.562500
B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 27-3AN-1998 -7,304,375.00 -7,304,375.00 100.7S0000
999ABV357 7.000% 02/15/2008 13-APR-1998 7,304,37S.00 7,304,375.00 100.7S0000
B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-DEC-1997 -20,281,250.00 -20,281,250.00 101.406250
999ABV993 7.000% 01/15/2027 26-7AN-1998 -20,281,2SO.00 0.00 101.406250
FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 26-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OFER-PIMCO
10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 20-7AN-1998 -10,071,875.00 -10,071,875.00 100.718750
999ABYSS6 6.199% 02/25/2028 24-FEB-1998 10,071,875.00 10,071,875.00 100.718750
B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,750 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 09-JAN-1998 -2,796,406.25 -2,796,406.25 101.687S00
994ABYSSO 7.000% 02/01/2028 12-FEB-1998 2,796,406.25 2,796,406.2E 101.687500
B GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 09-7AN-1998 -7,374,609 38 -7 374,609.38 101.718750
999ASY880 7.000% 02/01/2028 12-FEB-1998 7,374,609:38 7:374,609.38 101.718750
B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 9
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
__________________________________ __________________ ------------------ ____________________ ------------------
0.00
SALES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 08-JAN-1998 989,233.33 989,233.33 98.923333
0781SKBBO 02/11/1998 08-JAN-1998 -989,233.33 -989,233.33 98.923333
S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 08-JAN-1998 5,591.11 5,591.11 98.923333
0781SKBBO 02/11/1998 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 98.923333
i5 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,000,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 08-JAN-1998 994,824.44 994,824.44 98.923333
07815KBBO 02/11/1998 08-JAN-1998 994,824.44 0.00 98.923333
FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 08-JAN-1998 497,570.83 497,570.83 99.S14166
26354BAU6 01/28/1998 08-JAN-1998 -497,S70.83 -497,570.83 99.514166
S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-S00,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 08-JAN-1998 906.9S 906.95 99.514166
26354BAu6 01/28/1998 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 99.514166
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 08-JAN-1998 498,477.78 498,477.78 99.S14166
26354BAu6 01/28/1998 08-JAN-1998 498,477.78 0.00 99.514166
FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-3AN-1998 596,04350 596,043.50 99.340583
369593AC7 01/12/1998 02-JAN-1998 -596,043:50 -596,043.50 99.340583
S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-JAN-1998 3,006.50 3,006.50 99.340583
36959JAC7 01/12/1998 02-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 99.340583
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 10
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-JAN-1998 599,050.00 599,050.00 99.340583
36959JAC7 01/12/1998 02-JAN-1998 599,050.00 0.00 99.340583
FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 02-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-JAN-1998 2,076,684.17 2,076,684.17 98.889722
369593AN3 01/22/1998 02-JAN-1998 -2,076,684.17 -2,076,684.17 98.889722
S LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,100 000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-JAN-1998 16,712.50 16,712.50 98.889722
36459JAN3 01/22/1999 02-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 98.889722
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-JAN-1998 2,093,396.67 2,093,396.67 98.889722
36959JAN3 01/22/1998 02-JAN-1998 2,093,396.67 0.00 98.889722
FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC CLGSI), 02-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DiSC 02-JAN-1998 2,174,539.89 2,174,539.89 98.842722
36959JAP8 01/23/1998 02-3AN-1998 -2,174,539.89 -2.174,539.89 98.842722
S LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-JAN-1998 18,196.44 18,196.44 98.842722
36959JAP8 01/23/1998 02-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 98.842722
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-2,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-JAN-1998 2,192,736.33 2,192,736.33 98.842722
36959JAPB 01/23/1998 02-3AN-1998 2,192,736.33 0.00 98.842722
FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 02-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 08-JAN-1998 1,087,269.9S 1,087,269.95 98.842723
36959JAP8 01/23/1998 08-JAN-1998 -1,087,269.9S -1.087,269.95 98.842723
S LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,100.000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 08-]AN-1998 10,209.22 10.209.22 99.942723
Page 11
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-3AN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ RASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________
36959JAPS 01/23/1998 08-]AN-1998 0.00 0.00 98.942723
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-11200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 08-JAN-1998 1 097,479.17 1,097,479.17 98.842723
369593AP8 01/23/1998 08-JAN-1998 1:097,479.17 0.00 98.842723
FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.D0
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 IBM DISC 08-3AN-1998 1,485,675.00 1,485,675.00 99.045000
44922BB64 02/06/1998 08-3AN-1998 -2,485,675.00 1,48S,67S.00 99.045000
S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 IBM DISC 08-3AN-1998 7,679.17 7,679.17 99.045000
44922BB64 02/06/1998 08-JAM-1998 0.00 0.00 99.045000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 IBM DISC 08-JAN-1998 1,493,354.17 1,493,354.17 99.045000
449228864 02/06/1998 08-JAN-1998 1,493,354.17 0.00 99.045000
FC MORGAN ] P SECS - FIXED INCOME 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC O8-JAN-1998 888,421.50 888.421.S0 98.713500
63743DACS O1/12/1998 08-JAN-1998 -898,422.50 -888,421.50 98.713500
S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 08-JAN-1998 11,034.50 11,034.50 98.713500
63743DAC5 01/12/1998 08-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 98.713500
i5 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 08-3AN-1998 899,456.00 899,456.00 98.713500
63743DAC5 01/12/1998 08-3AN-1998 899,456.00 0.00 98.713500
PC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 08-]AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-334 74300 BSOT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 16-JAN-1998 334,743.00 334,743.00 1.000000
999087694 VAR RT DO O6/26/1997 16-JAN-1998 -334,743.00 -334.743.00 1.000000
S 16-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 12
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST a
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
5ECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-154,018.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 20-JAN-1998 154,018.00 154,018.00 1.000000
996087094 VAR RT DD 06/26/1997 20-JAN-1998 -154,018.00 -154,018.00 1.000000
S 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-160,262.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-JAN-1998 160.262.00 160,262.00 1.000000
99949S906 PUBLIC II 02-JAN-1998 -160,262.00 -160,262.00 1.000000
S 02-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 12-3AN-1998 3.00 3.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 12-JAN-1998 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000
S 12-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-217,809.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 14-3AN-1998 217,809.00 217,809.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 14-3AN-1998 -217,909.00 -217,809.00 1.000000
S 14-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-87,424.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 15-JAN-1998 87,424.00 87,424.00 1.000000
99949S906 PUBLIC II 15-JAN-1998 -87,424.00 -87.424.00 1.000000
S 1S-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-499,853.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 21-3AN-1998 499,853.00 499,853.00 1.000000
99949S906 PUBLIC II 21-JAN-1998 -499,853.00 -499.853.00 1.000000
S 21-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,693,781.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 22-JAN-1998 2,693,781.00 2,693,781.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 22-3AN-1998 -2,693,781.00 -2,693,781.00 1.000000
5 22-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-256,168.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 26-JAN-1998 256,168.00 256,168.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 26-JAN-1998 -2S6,168.00 -256,168.00 1.000000
S 26-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,3SO.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 27-JAN-1998 3,350.00 3,350.00 1.000000
Page 13
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
999495906 PUBLIC II 27-JAN-1998 -3,350.00 -3,350.00 1.000000
S 27-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-277.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 30-JAN-1998 277.00 277.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 30-JAN-1998 -277.00 -277.00 1.000000
S 30-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500 000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 22-JAN-1998 4,036,718.7E 4,036,718.7S 161.468750
91H10DJ4 13.2SO% 05/15/2014 DO OS/15/84 23-JAN-1998 -4,029 030.32 -4,029,030.32 161.468750
S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 7:688.43 7,688.43 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,500 000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 22-JAN-1998 63,138.81 63,138.81 161.468750
91H10DJ4 13.250% 05/15/2014 DO OS/15/84 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 161.468750
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2.500,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 22-JAN-1998 4,099,8S7.56 4,099,957.56 161.468750
912810DJ4 13.250% 05/15/2014 DO 05/15/84 23-JAN-1998 4,099,857.56 0.00 161.468750
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000 000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-1998 2,661,87S.00 2,661,875.00 133.093750
91HI0DY1 08.750% 05/15/2017 DO OS/1S/87 20-JAN-1998 -2,663.639.50 -2,663,639.50 133.0937SO
S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- -1,764.SO -1,764.50 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000 000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-1998 31,906.08 31,906.08 133.093750
9U81ODY1 08.75D% 05/1S/2017 DO 05/15/87 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 133.093750
I5 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000 000.00 U 5 TREASURY BONDS 16-3AN-1998 2,693 78108 2,693,781.08 133.093750
M810DY1 08.750% 05/15/2017 DO OS/15/87 20-3AN-1998 2,693:781:08 0.00 133.093750
PC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 20-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2.000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-1998 2,661,875.00 2,661,87S.00 133.093750
91281ODY1 08.750% OS/15/2017 DO 05/1S/87 20-JAN-1998 -2,663,639.SO -2,663,639.50 133.093750
S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- -1,764.50 -1,764.50 1.000000000
Page 14
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2.000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-1998 31,906.08 31,906.08 133.093750
91281ODYI 08.750% OS/15/2017 DO 05/15/87 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 133.093750
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-1998 2,693,781.08 2,693.781.08 133.093750
91281ODY1 08.7SO% OS/15/2017 DO 05/15/87 20-JAN-1998 2,693,781.08 0.00 133.093750
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-JAN-1998 -2,661,875.00 -2,661,875.00 133.093750
91281ODYI 08.750% 05/15/2017 DO 05/15/87 20-JAN-1998 2,663,639.50 2,663,639.50 133.093750
SC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 1,764.50 1,764.50 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-3AN-1998 -31,906.08 -31,906.08 133.093750
91281ODYI 08.750% 05/15/2017 DO 05/15/87 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 133.093750
ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2.000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 16-3AN-1998 -2,693,781.08 -2,693,781.08 133.093750
91281ODY1 08.750% 05/15/2017 DO 05/15/87 20-JAN-1998 -2,693,781.08 0.00 133.093750
FCC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 20-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-24,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-]AN-1998 25,302,062.50 25,302,062.50 102.437500
912827RZO 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 09-JAN-1998 -25,147,075.33 -25,147,075.33 102.437500
S FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- 154,987.17 154,987.17 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-24,700,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-3AN-1998 614,514.85 614.514.85 102.437500
912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 09-]AN-1998 0.00 0.00 102.437500
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-24,700 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-JAN-1998 25,916,577.35 25,916,577.35 102.437500
91f827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 09-JAN-1998 25,916,577.35 0.00 102.437500
FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 09-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 15
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-3AN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-17,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 14-3AN-1998 18,174,062.S0 18,174,062.SO 106.906250
912827ZX3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DO 02/15/91 15-JAN-1998 -17,734,218.75 -17,734,218.7S 106.906250
S LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 439,843.75 439,843.75 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17.000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 14-JAN-1998 547,764.95 547,764.95 106.906250
912827zx3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DO 02/15/91 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 106.9062SO
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 14-JAN-1998 18,721,827.45 18,721,827.45 106.906250
912827Zx3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DO 02/15/91 15-JAN-1998 18,721,827.4S 0.00 106.906250
FC LEHMAN BROS INC 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JAN-1998 2,708,062.50 2,708,062.50 104.156250
9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 23-3AN-1998 -2,643,542.87 -2,643,542.87 104.156250
5 BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN ----------- 64,519.63 64,519.63 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2.600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-3AN-1998 25,071.43 25,071.43 104.156250
9128272w1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 104.156250
Is 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JAN-1998 2.733,133.93 2,733,133.93 104.156250
9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 23-JAN-1998 2.733,133.93 0.00 104.156250
FC BANK OF NEW YORK TORONTO DOMIN 23-JAN-1999 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 20-JAN-1998 10.074,218.75 10,074,218.75 100.742188
999AA6619 6.170% 01/25/2028 27-JAN-1998 -9,978,125.00 -9,978,125.00 100.742188
S BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 96,093.7S 96,093.75 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 20-JAN-1998 10,074,218.75 10,074,218.75 100.742188
999AA6619 6.170% 01/25/2028 27-JAN-1998 10,074,218.75 0.00 100.742188
FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 27-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 09-JAN-1998 2,798,876.95 2,798,876.95 101.777344
999ABT444 7.000% 01/15/2028 14-JAN-1998 -2,749,548.83 -2,749,548.83 101.777344
S GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 49,328.12 49,328.12 1.000000000
Page 16
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST -
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 09-JAN-1998 2,798,876.95 2,798,876.95 101.777344
994ABT444 7.000% 01/15/2028 14-JAN-1998 2,798,876.95 0.00 101.777344
FC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 14-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 09-JAN-1998 7,381,123.05 7,381,123.05 101.808594
999ABT444 7.000% 01/15/2028 14-3AN-1998 -7,248,810.55 -7,248,810.55 101.808594
S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 132,312.50 132,312.50 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 09-JAN-1998 7,381,123.05 7,381,123.05 101.808594
999ABT444 7.000% 01/15/2028 14-JAN-1998 7,381,123.05 0.00 101.808594
FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 14-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 22-JAN-1998 20,321,875.00 20,321,875.00 101.609375
999ABv993 7.000% 01/15/2027 26-3AN-1998 -20,281,250.00 -20,281,250.00 101.609375
S FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 40,625.00 40,625.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 22-JAN-1998 20,321,875.00 20,321,875.00 101.609375
999ABv993 7.000% 01/15/2027 26-3AN-1998 20.321,875.00 0.00 101.609375
FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 26-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,250.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 27-JAN-1998 7,324,765.63 7,324,765.63 101.031250
999ABY880 7.000% 02/01/2028 12-FEB-1998 -7,373,986.33 -7,373.986.33 101.031250
5 SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- -49,220.70 -49,220.70 1.000000000
0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-281,382.18 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-JAN-1998 281,382.18 281,382.18 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-3AN-1998 -280,799.63 -280,799.63 100.000000
PD ----------- 582.55 582.55 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-281,382.18 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 15-JAN-1998 281,382.18 281,382.18 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 IS-JAN-1998 281,382.18 0.00 100.000000
PC 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 17
DCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE WIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-JAN-1998 1.00 1.00 100.000000
21075WDK8 6.190% 10/1S/2011 0O 11/23/96 01-JAN-1998 -1.00 -1.00 100.000000
PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 01-JAN-1998 -1.00 -1.00 100.000000
21075WDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-JAN-1998 1.00 1.00 100.000000
PDC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1.00 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1998 1.00 1.00 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 IS-JAN-1998 -1.00 -1.00 100.000000
PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1.00 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 1S-3AN-1998 -1.00 -1.00 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-3AN-1998 1.00 1.00 100.000000
PDC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-31 622.18 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1998 31,622.18 31 622.18 100.000000
31677EM4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-3AN-1998 -31,622.18 -31:622.18 100.000000
PD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-31,622.18 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1998 31,622.18 31,622.18 100.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 1S-JAN-1998 31,622.28 0.00 100.000000
FC 1S-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-96 233.60 GNMA JJ POOL #0080023 01-3AN-1998 96,233.60 96,233.60 100.000000
36HSCAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-JAN-1998 -97,827.47 -97,827.47 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,S93.87 -1,593.87 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-96 233.60 GNMA IJ POOL #0080023 O1-JAN-1998 96,233.60 96,233.60 100.000000
3612SCAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 0o 12/01/96 01-JAN-1998 96,233:60 0.00 100.000000
FC 20-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7S,810.96 GNMA II POOL #080088M 01-3AN-1998 7S,810.96 75,810.96 100.000000
Page 18
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-JAN-1998 - 31-JAM-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
_______________________________ _____________ -------------------- ____--___________-
36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-JAN-1998 -77,469.32 -77,469.32 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,658.36 -1,658.36 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-75,810.96 GNMA II POOL #080088M O1-JAN-1998 75,810.96 75,810.96 100.000000
36225ccZ0 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-JAN-1998 75,810.96 0.00 100.000000
FC 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
MATURITIES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK DISC NTS 15-JAN-1998 296,808.75 296,808.75 100.000000
313313Rv2 01/15/1998 15-JAN-1998 -296,808.75 -296,808.75 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-3,000,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS SYS DISC 20-3AN-1998 2,946,549.17 2,946,549.17 100.000000
313313SA7 01/20/1998 20-JAN-1998 -2,946,549.17 -2,946,549.17 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 23-JAN-1998 499,849.44 499,849.44 100.000000
313397SD4 MAT O1/23/1998 23-JAN-1998 -499,849.44 -499.849.44 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-2,600.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 15-JAN-1998 2,565,644.16 2,565,644.16 100.000000
313589RV7 MAT 01/15/1998 15-JAN-1998 -2,565,644.16 -2,565,644.16 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 14-JAN-1998 788,000.44 788,000.44 100.000000
34539UAE2 01/14/1998 14-JAN-1998 -798.000.44 -788,000.44 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 14-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 23-JAN-1998 299,683.25 299,683.25 100.000000
34539UAP7 01/23/1998 23-JAN-1998 -299,683.25 -299,683.25 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-400,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 23-JAN-1998 399,449.00 399,449.00 100.000000
36959JAP8 01/23/1998 23-JAN-1998 -399,449.00 -399,449.00 100.000000
Page 19
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-JAN-1998 - 31-3AN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
MT BOND MATURITY 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 28-JAN-1998 783,68533 783,685.33 100.000000
369597AU7 01/28/1998 28-JAN-1998 -783,685:33 -783,685.33 100.000000
Mf BOND MATURITY 28-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 IBM DISC 08-JAN-1998 99,861.33 99,861.33 100.000000
44922BA81 01/08/1998 08-JAN-1998 -99,861.33 -99,861.33 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 08-JAN-1998 789,393.33 789,393.33 100.000000
63743DA84 01/08/1998 08-JAN-1998 -789,393.33 -789,393.33 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITY
U.S. DOLLAR
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-S,300.00 TO BRING ACCOUNT INTO BALANCE 30-JAM-1998 0.00 0.00 0.000000
9128272M3 01-31-98 30-JAN-1998 -5 154.66 -5,154.66 0.000000
SW US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -5:154.66 -5,154.66 1.000000000
3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/1S/97 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,640.00 TO BRING ACCOUNT INTO BALANCE 30-]AN-1998 0.00 0.00 0.000000
9128273A8 1-30-98 30-JAN-1998 -3,635.34 -3,635.34 0.000000
SW US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT ----------- -3,635.34 -3,635.34 1.000000000
3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 0.00
INTEREST
U.S. DOLLAR
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
281,382.18 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 25-JAN-1998 21 739.17 21,739.17 0.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/95 15-JAN-1998 21:739.17 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3.500,000.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 15-JAN-1998 18,054.16 18,054.16 0.000000
21075WDKB 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 01-JAN-1998 18,054.16 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-]AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR SK DISC NTS 1S-3AN-1998 3,191.25 3,191.25 0.000000
Page 20
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD ,
01-JAN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
313313RV2 01/15/1998 15-3AN-1998 3,191.25 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
3,000,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS SYS DISC 20-JAN-1998 53,450.83 53,450.83 0.000000
313313SA7 01/20/1998 20-JAN-1998 53,450.83 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-1AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 23-3AN-1998 150.56 150.56 0.000000
3133975D4 MAT 01/23/1998 23-JAN-1998 150.56 0.00 0.000000
IT 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2.600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 15-JAN-1998 34,355 84 34,355.84 0.000000
313589RV7 MAT 01/15/1998 15-JAN-1998 34,355:84 0.00 0.000000
xT 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1.00 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA IS-JAN-1998 2,935.17 2,935.17 0.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1998 2,935.17 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1.00 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1998 -2,935.17 -2,935.17 0.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1998 -2,935.17 0.00 0.000000
ITC 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
31,622.18 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 15-JAN-1998 2,935.18 2,935.18 0.000000
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 15-JAN-1998 7,935.18 0.00 0.000000
IT 15-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 14-JAN-1998 11,999.56 11,999.56 0.000000
34539UAE2 01/14/1998 14-JAN-1998 11,999.56 0.00 0.000000
IT 14-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 23-JAN-1998 316.75 316.75 0.000000
34539UAP7 01/23/1998 23-JAN-1998 316.75 0.00 0.000000
IT 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 21
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-3AN-1998 - 31-JAN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
96,233.60 GNMA II POOL #0080023 20-3AN-1998 24,29094 24,290.94 0.000000
36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-3AN-1998 24,290:94 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
75 810.96 GNMA II POOL A`080088M 20-JAN-1998 34,068.24 34,068.24 0.000000
36f25CC20 7.OD0% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-JAN-1998 34,068.24 0.00 0.000000
IT 20-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 23-3AN-1998 551.00 551.00 0.000000
369593APS 01/23/1998 23-3AN-1998 551.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 23-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PINCO
800 000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 28-JAN-1998 16,324.67 16,314.67 0.000000
36159JAU7 01/28/1998 28-3AN-1998 16,314.67 0.00 0.000000
IT 28-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
100 000.00 IBM DISC 08-JAN-1998 138.67 138.67 0.000000
44422BA81 01/09/1998 08-JAN-1998 138.67 0.00 0.000000
IT 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 08-JAN-1998 10,606.67 10,606.67 0.000000
63743DA84 01/08/1998 08-JAN-1998 10,606.67 0.00 0.000000
IT 08-JAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,000.000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 16-JAN-1998 172,072.69 172,072.69 0.000000
9128272M3 3.375% 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 15-DEC-1997 172,072.69 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1997 -17,500.00 -17,500.00 0.000000
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/14/97 15-JUL-1997 -17,500.00 O.DO 0.000000
ITC 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1997 17,500.00 17,S00.00 0.000000
Page 22
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-3AN-1998 - 31-3AN-1998 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/14/97 31-DEC-1997 17,500.00 0.00 0.000000
CD RECEIVED INTEREST 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
DECEMBER 1997 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINTO
7,000 000.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 16-IAN-1998 127,983.88 127,983.88 0.000000
91i8273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-3AN-1998 127,983.88 0.00 0.000000
IT 16-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SHORT TERM FOS INT AD3 30-3AN-1998 -276.76 -276.76 0.000000
99000OP34 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 30-3AN-1998 -276.76 0.00 0.000000
CW AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 30-IAN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-3AN-1998 1,211.40 1,211.40 0.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 01-3AN-1998 1,211.40 0.00 0.000000
IT 02-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-3AN-1998 571.59 571.59 0.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 01-3AN-1998 571.59 0.00 0.000000
IT 02-3AN-1998 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 23
IF
FAHR COMMITTEE MeeiingDe TOmaft
02/11/ga g3/25/98
AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance (�'//
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager --
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
REPORT FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1 THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 1997.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the
period October 1 through December 31, 1997.
SUMMARY
Section 15.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly
reporting requirements for the Districts' two investment portfolios. These two
funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies,"
are managed by PIMCO, the Districts' external money manager.
The ongoing monitoring of the Districts' investment program by staff and Callan
Associates, the Districts' independent investment advisor, indicates that the
Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted Investment
Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has
tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the
Districts to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months.
The Districts' portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or
derivative securities.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
H'.My.CbYinY'1Ns"nFNIMF�Hfl89YFB'LW,MIylnMpl.Gc
Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Performance Reports
The quarterly strategy review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment
Measurement Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for your
reference. Also attached are two comparative bar charts which depict the sector
diversification of the Districts' portfolios, as of September 30, 1997, and
December 31, 1997. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average
maturity of less than 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments
such as U.S. Treasuries, and corporate discount notes.
Portfolio Performance Summary
The following table presents a summary of the performance of the Districts'
portfolios managed by PIMCO for the period October 1 through
December 1, 1997.
PoMolio Perionnance Summary
Quarter End d December 31,1007
Liquid Operating Monies(%) Long-Term Operating Monies(%)
Tdel Rete oiftetum
3 Months 1 4 2.0
B Months 28 4.6
9 Months 4.3 1.3
12 Months 5.6 7.9
Since inception 30 Sept 95 5.6 7.0
Benchmark,
3 Months 1.3 1.8
8 Moms 2.6 4.2
9 Months 3.9 6.8
12 Months 52 7.2
Market Value per PIMCO 31 Dec.97 $17.6M $301.1M
Average Quality 'AAA' 'AAA"
Estimated Yield to Maturity 31 Dec.97 5.84% 5.84%
Quartedy Deposits(Withdrawals) ($3.0M)
Estimated Annual Income $1.0M $19.3M
Market Recap
Solid gains were posted in the fourth quarter of 1997 by U.S. fixed income
markets, as investors continued to view U.S. economic growth as balanced and
non-inflationary, and the Asian economic crisis fueled increased investor
movement toward the relative safety and quality of fixed income investments.
With the inflation outlook improving, and short-term interest rates left unchanged
by the Federal Reserve, the fourth quarter 1997 benchmark 30-year Treasury
yield curve continued to flatten when compared to both the fourth quarter 1996
yield curve, and the third quarter 1997 yield curve. While quarter-end short-term
weMnWem1lrq.EbNn131puawFAXRIFAXRB9SE@9uaMINnnOpt dx
Re l „s Page 2
v
rates were higher by as much as 25 basis points for the 3-month maturity(5.34%
vs. 5.09%), mid to long-term rates (more than 1 year)were lower at quarter-end
as compared to the start of the quarter by 9 basis points or more. This is
depicted in the attached comparative graph of the "Historical Yield Curve." As a
result, the yield advantage of longer maturity Treasury securities narrowed
significantly by the end of the quarter.
For the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO continued a weighted
maturity or duration, near, to slightly above, the duration index (2.3 years),
emphasizing high-quality mortgage backed securities. This strategy contributed
to the portfolio outperforming its benchmark again this quarter (2.0% vs. 1.8%).
For the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, PIMCO maintained a below-index
duration posture (25.5 days) which benefited the portfolio as short-term rates
rose over the quarter. Investments in short maturity investment grade
commercial paper, and U.S. Agency discount notes were emphasized,
contributing incremental yield to the portfolio, which performed slightly better than
its benchmark (1.4% vs. 1.3%).
Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the
table below, and in the attached bar chart. During the month of October,
$20 million was withdrawn from the Long-Tenn Operating Monies portfolio to
fund cash flow requirements. In December, the Districts received $17 million
through the Orange County Tax Collector's property tax allocation cycle. These
funds were deposited to the Long-Term portfolio for investment.
Long-Term
uquw Operating
Quarter Operating Monies
Ending Monies(SM) (SM)
31 Dec.96 14.4 311.5
31 Mar.97 4.5 313.2
30 June 97 17.1 321.3
30 Sept.97 17.4 296.5
31 Dec.97 17.6 301,1
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
\YKnW"b1M9.trsYV IaavxFAXrSF.W P�4'FEtruMIHn'M4r.Mc
ne,me. 1rne Page 3
ATTACHMENTS
1. PIMCO Report
2. Callan Report
3. Three Comparative Bar Charts
4. Historical Yield Curve Graph
1wGmWM11Wp.UpY,nU'IOwero4'AHRIFAXXB91fE8WwM�ylnwEpl.C¢
Re 1� Page 4
Prepared by Finance, 212198, 9:56 AM
CSDOC Investment Management Program
Quarter End Portfolio Values
(Marked-to-Market)
$350,000,000
$300,000,000 iii __. iii iii - -- -.
$250,000,000 - iii --- iii iii --- iii
iii iii iii ��� ���
$200,000,000 H
- -- iii iii --- iii .. _. ♦++ ._... ___ ���
iii iii =
iii iii N'
$150,000,000 - ��i - ��i ���
$100,000,000 -- ....... iii - --- iii ----- --- iii i•i— iii
��♦
+*+ ♦++ ♦++ iii
$50,000,000 - iii -- iii— iii iii ...
++ ��� ♦�♦ iii
..
♦�♦ +o+ •+• ++* iii
$0 ��� ++• �++
31 Dec 96 31 Mar 97 30 Jun 97 30 Sep 97 31 Dec 97
O Liquid Operating Monies ff] Long-Term Operating Monies
G:\excel.dta\fin\2220\geggi\Fina nce\inveslmg mtpmg ra m
Q
Prepared b Finance, 2/2/88, 8:47 AM
CSDOC Liquid
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Diversification 100100
100
90
80
70
60 ❑ 9/30/97
= 50
® 12/31/97
(D 40
a
30
20
10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash
Equivalent
G:\excel.dta\fn\2220\geggi\Finance\Portfolio short term
Prepared by Finance,2/2198, 8:50 AM
CSDOC Long-Term
Operating Monies Portfolio
Investment Diversification
100 T
90
80
70 61 61
�_ 60 ❑ 9/30/97
50 012/31/97
U
40
30
23 20
20 13 1
10 0
00 00
0
Govt Mtg Corp Non US$ Other Net Cash
Equivalent
G:\excel.dta\fn\2220\9eggi\Finance\Portfolio long term graph
Prepared by Finance,WIN, 4:21 PM
HISTORICAL YIELD CURVE
7.0
6.5 --
x
9 6.0
Y
s.s
5.0
�12131198 -a 10/1197 —w-12131/97
G:bxcel.dtaVIM22201geggi%Finance W istodcalyleldmme
FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Dale TOA.as:.
02/11/96 07J2519e
AGENDA REPORT lemf Mr
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 6
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: ANNUAL RENEWAL OF BOILER & MACHINERY INSURANCE
FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 1, 1998 TO MARCH 1, 1999.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Renew Boiler & Machinery Insurance for the Districts for the period March 1,
1998 to March 1, 1999, with Kemper Insurance Companies, in an amount not to
exceed $71,286.
SUMMARY
This agenda item recommends the annual renewal of Boiler & Machinery
insurance coverage for the Districts for the period March 1, 1998 through
March 1, 1999.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Robert F. Driver Associates, the Districts' Broker of Record, has completed their
survey of the current Boiler & Machinery insurance market, and recommends that
the Districts renew Boiler & Machinery insurance coverage with Kemper
Insurance Companies for 1998-99. See attached Broker of Record letter.
"wn.enn„v+a�,,,wr.wmou.aaes®aaixawu,.ex
a—..a. +tea Page 1
K
To analyze available coverage levels and premium costs, Driver marketed the
Districts' Boiler& Machinery insurance requirements to five insurance carriers.
After reviewing the renewal proposals, Driver entered into negotiations with
Kemper, the Districts' current Boiler & Machinery insurance underwriter. The
negotiations concluded with a 10% reduction ($7,921) in premium costs below
last year's cost, while continuing to provide the same level of coverage
($100 million per occurrence) as last year.
Kemper Insurance Companies, with more than $1.5 billion in reserves, is rated
W/FSC XIV (Excellent) by A.M. Best Company (the insurance industry rating
agency), for its overall ability to meet its obligations to policyholders.
Kemper remains one of the few insurance companies to offer Boiler& Machinery
insurance with high coverage levels for operations as large and complex as the
Districts, and they offer the most competitive pricing for the 1998-99 renewal
period. Staff concurs with Driver's findings and recommendation. Sufficient
funds are contained in the current budget to cover premium costs ($71,286).
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Broker of Record Letter
SK:Ic
H W.y W'FnV lPcnne�ARRFAHfl89l®Bob6MYl.tls
Page 2
MATOC
ROBERTF. DRIVERASSOCIATES •cDMPLEreRvsuRANcssoNDseswcc
a Divisionc.,on of Robert F.Driver Co.,In E
February 2, 1998
Mr. Steve Kozak
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,CA
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
RE: Boiler&Machinery Renewal
Kemper Policy#3XL 131 839-01
Effective: March 1, 1998
Dear Steve,
Pursuant to our discussion today and to our ongoing dialogue in most effectively employing
marketing strategies,over the past two months, we have concluded our renewal negotiations with
Kemper who continues to be the most cost competitive insurer for the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County as underscored by their $71,286 renewal premium, a I0a/o reduction
over current pricing.
In addition to offering the most attractive pricing (as you know, we surveyed Chubb, Hartford,
Sable-Reliance and Travelers), we believe that Kemper's expertise in servicing large and
complex operations such as the Districts ensures you a valuable resource. We recommend your
authorizing us to implement renewal coverage.
Sincerely,
ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES
Donald H.McLean
First Vice President
4041 MACARTHUR BLVD.,SUITE 300, P.O.BOX 6450,NEWPORT BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92658-6450
(714)756-0271•FAX(714)756-2713• UC.#0084379
FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date Toa aas.
02/11/98 02/25/98
AGENDA REPORT "`�unbe '��"q�
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: SUBSTITUTION OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGIES TO
REPLACE J.D. EDWARDS FOR IMPLEMENTATION PORTION
ONLY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve the substitution of Enterprise Technologies to replace J.D. Edwards for
the implementation portion of the Financial Information System.
SUMMARY
At the January FAHR Committee meeting, the Directors requested additional
information regarding the replacement of J.D. Edwards with Enterprise
Technologies for the remainder of the Financial Information System
implementation. J.D. Edwards has changed their strategic plan and is leaving
the implementation process to third parties. This change has required them to
sub-contract the implementation of our project, because J.D. Edwards can no
longer provide a local client implementation project manager and implementation
team.
Enterprise Technologies has most of the staff that is currently working on our
project and has access to the others. This change will provide the same
implementation team for more hours at a lower hourly cost. J.D. Edwards will
continue to supply software updates and telephone support.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The original Board authorization not to exceed $1,525,000, for the purchase of
hardware, software and implementation, was reduced to $1,485,000 in July 1996
during staffs negotiations with J.D. Edwards. This request does not include any
additional funding. Staff and Enterprise Technologies are confident that the
remaining implementation can be completed within budget.
�..n.mn.u+ao.wru�mrr,waues�.wnE.e.�•nrnaa
R....a vsw Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
At the July 24, 1996 meeting, the Joint Boards of Directors authorized the
General Manager to execute a contract for a new financial information system
with J.D. Edwards and Company, and approved the purchase of hardware from
the California Multiple Awards Schedule (CMAS)for a combined amount not to
exceed $1,485,000, which was a $40,000 decrease from their original approval.
Contract negotiations were subsequently completed with J.D. Edwards resulting
in a signed contract for software, licenses, system installation, training, and data
conversion. The IBM AS/400 hardware was purchased separately from CMAS.
The implementation has been progressing pretty much on schedule. Workflow
analysis, data conversion, database population, process design, debugging and
training are completed for payroll, human resources benefits, budgeting and
budget control, general ledger, accounts payable, cash receipts, accounts
receivable, purchasing, job cost and Phase 1 of inventory orders and issues.
This is an especially noteworthy accomplishment, since the system being
replaced was purchased in 1979.
Remaining applications to be implemented and the projected schedules are:
Applications Oriainal Comoletion Date Projected Completion Date
Fixed Assets July 1997 February 1998
Phase II-Inventory Not Originally Identified March 1998
Contract Management Not Originally Identified April 1998
The implementation plan has always been a two-part process. Part 1 was to
install the proven legacy J.D. Edwards system. This step included updating our
systems and processes from our 1979 system and transitioning from a
centralized input and control organization to an organization of distributed
processing. Part 2 is the conversion from the legacy system to an Oracle-based
relational data base system called OneWorld. After completion of Part 2, all of
the Districts' software will be Windows and Oracle compatible.
H:1xy d¢
R.n..d ,. Page 2
4
During the 1997-98 budget process, it became evident to staff that the
organizational changes that needed to completely implemented prior to starting
Part 2 were too overwhelming to be completed by June 1998. Since the
J.D. Edwards legacy system was producing, was expected to be fully functional,
and would meet most all of our needs, staff and J.D. Edwards agreed that it
would be wise to delay the implementation of Part 2 upgrade until 1998-99. This
projected schedule may need to be revised as we develop the interface and
changes needed for Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS)
integration.
Since the financial information system agreement was entered into with J.D.
Edwards in October of 1996, J.D. Edwards company has gone public. As a
result, the company's strategic plan has refocused on software development and
sales and has moved away from system implementation. The change in the
company's strategy first impacted the Districts in September of 1997 when
J.D. Edwards reassigned the Costa Mesa based implementation manager to
sales and replaced him with an implementation manager based in Denver. In
January of this year, J.D. Edwards decided again to replace the implementation
manager with one from their Atlanta office. The impact of these changes has
been a decline in the availability of overall project management services, and
J.D. Edwards has encouraged us to replace them with one of their business
partners in order to serve us better.
The Director of Finance, Controller and Purchasing Manager/Contracts Manager
interviewed three of J.D. Edwards business partners as a replacement for
consulting services on the implementation of the remaining projects of the
financial information system. These three business partners were Global
Business Solutions, Decision Technologies, and Enterprise Technologies.
Global Business Solutions does not have an available implementation manager
to assign to the Districts' project at this time. Decision Technologies is based in
Fremont, California, and all consultants assigned to this project would have to be
reimbursed for travel, meals and lodging, costs that were not originally included
in our budget would probably cause the project to go over budget.
After interviewing Enterprise Technologies, the Finance Department
management concluded that they would be the best firm to complete the financial
information system implementation project, and recommend that the committee
approve their substitution for J.D. Edwards for remaining implementation only, for
the following reasons:
• The Implementation Manager has already been working on this project since
last September as a subcontractor through J.D. Edwards, and was
responsible for the implementation of Purchasing and Inventory modules.
• There will be no learning curve for the consultants.
H M .Upffin�AHWAHHB8ff R-E,Rgp6eTeU..Ga
�: uses Page 3
v
• Enterprise Technologies is an Orange County firm that can provide all of their
consultants out of the local area thereby eliminating any per diem or travel
costs.
• Enterprise Technologies has agreed to provide their consultants at lower
hourly rates then were charged by J.D. Edwards which will either provide
more consulting hours under the current agreement or reduce the total project
cost.
• Enterprise Technologies has been approved by J.D. Edwards to complete the
implementation of this project.
During discussion at the last Committee meeting, the Directors asked for
additional information about the Financial Information System project. In
addition, to clarifying the original staff report, staff has prepared the attached
questions and answer sheets to satisfy those requests.
ALTERNATIVES
Continue using J.D. Edwards sub-consultants to implement the remainder of the
Financial Information System Project which would probably lead to
implementation delays and cost overruns. The hourly rates charged through J.D.
Edwards are high and our contract does not exclude travel costs for consultants
from outside the area.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Financial Information System Implementation Questions and Answers.
2. CSDOC FTE Requirement for Installation of New FIS.
3. Trade publication article explaining JDE strategy change.
4. October 1996 General Counsel Memo re JDE contract.
MM.y.O•YnVt WiMI=�XPYN1�`BF�.AI!'EMprweT6hM1c
Fwusf. ,� Page 4
r
Financial Information System Implementation
Questions and Answers
Resulting from the January 21, 1998 FAHR Meeting
Question No. 1: Isn't the Districts'current contract with J.D. Edwards a
fixed priced contract that contains specific deliverable dates as to the
completion of various applications?
The original intent of the Districts' Financial Information System (F.I.S.) Request
for Proposal (RFP) was to enter into a fixed priced contract with specific
deliverables. However, it became apparent that the software industry, as a
whole, was moving away from fixed priced contracts based on the RFP
responses received. The underlying premise is that the successful
implementation of a computer system was highly dependent on both the
company selling the system and overseeing the installation and training of the
software, and the commitment of the agency purchasing the system, leaming the
software and taking ownership of the system. For example, attached is a listing
of the CSDOC staffing requirement for this project that was generated jointly by
J.D. Edwards and Districts' staff in September of 1996.
Although the best the Districts could negotiate was a time and materials contract
with J.D. Edwards, the Districts did negotiate fixed prices in some areas, and
more importantly, the right to discontinue, at any time, the consulting services of
J.D. Edwards without incurring additional costs or penalties. At this time, staff is
recommending that we discontinue the consulting services of J.D. Edwards. The
remainder of the implementation consulting services can be performed by
Enterprise Technology in order to improve the quality of the implementation
consulting services.
Question No. 2: Is this request to use Enterprise Technology for the
remaining portion of the implementation contract a non-performance issue
on the part of J.D. Edwards?
No. The implementation so far is on schedule, and the system works. J.D.
Edwards has changed their business direction. Because the contract with J.D.
Edwards is based on time and materials, the Districts can control the costs and
services rendered by J.D. Edwards by asking them to stop working on the
project.
A.w.a ,rssc Page 1
P
Question No. 3: Why is the estimated completion of the OneWorld
conversion/Migration being delayed one year to June 30, 1999?
Following the contract negotiations in October of 1996, J.D. Edwards consultants
and staff developed an implementation plan, with estimated timelines, that was
broken down into four phases, Payroll and Human Resources, General
Accounting, Distribution, and migration to OneWorld. This timeline was only an
estimate, and was developed at a time when it was not fully known how the J.D.
Edwards system would integrate with the RJN Computerized Maintenance
Management System (CMMS). This question is still being addressed today as
the RJN system is being upgraded for the Windows NT environment and for
additional functionality in the areas of reporting material and overhead costs for
the maintenance of equipment items. The goal is to complete the
implementation of all of the J.D. Edwards F.I.S. applications as well as all of the
upgrades to the RJN CMMS system before we convert to the J.D. Edwards
OneWorld (Oracle database) system from the WoridVision (dbase II database)
system.
Although the revised estimate is now one year later, no additional costs will be
incurred as a result of this revised estimate. In fact, the conversion is expected
to go more smoothly as staff has become familiar with the functionality and the
input and reporting that has been distributed throughout the organization instead
of being centralized in Accounting.
Question No. 4: Staffs recommendation is to use Enterprise Technology
for the remaining FIS implementation, which is a recently established entity
that is seen to have only one employee. Isn't there a better alternative with
a more established J.D. Edwards Business Partner?
Staff believes that Enterprise Technologies is the best consulting firm to
complete the remainder of the FIS implementation applications based on the
following:
• Project Continuity - Mario Alvarado, Implementation Manager from Enterprise
Technologies, has been working on this project since last October as
Business Partner working through J.D. Edwards. The knowledge Mario has
gained in how the Districts conducts our business in the areas of purchasing,
warehousing, inventory, and accounts payable would be lost, and a new
consultant would have to begin again to acquire this knowledge base. In
essence, by contracting directly with Enterprise Technologies, we are
eliminating J.D. Edwards as the middle man along with the higher fees
associated with this arrangement while maintaining the same people already
working on this project.
KM�YmV 10.avMFNPfiFIHff£,naPmTa,.6x
n..er. ,rsm Page 2
9
• Capabilities - Mario Alvarado, Implementation Manager from Enterprise
Technologies, has demonstrated the most knowledge and capabilities of any
consultant, either from J.D. Edwards or from their business partners, since
the inception of this project.
• Cost -The proposed hourly rates from all three J.D. Edwards business
partners interviewed are shown below:
Consulting Firm Protect Management Services Protect Consulting Services
Enterprise Technologies $160 per hour $125 per hour
Decision Technologies S200 per hour+Airfare/lodging $160 per hour+ airfareliodging
Global Business Solutions $200 per hour+airfare/lodging $160 per hour+ airfarellodging
Only Enterprise Technologies has lower rates than those currently being
charged directly by J.D. Edwards. In addition, the proposed staffing from
Decision Technologies and Global Business Solutions is based out of
Fremont, California and Phoenix, Arizona, respectively. Each of these
Business Partners would also charge the Districts for airfare and lodging,
costs that were not originally included within the J.D. Edwards proposal
because they were based out of Costa Mesa.
Question No. 5: What Is the status of the JDE/IBM Project Budget?
Estimated Costs
Project Incurred Remaining
FIS Component Budget To Date Budget
IBM Hardware Platform $ 245,100 $ 170,667 $ 74,433
Software License Fee 313,875 270,180 43,695
OneWodd Software Fee 60,000 60,000
Training 102000 62100 39900
Consulting Services 574065 383840 190,225
Pro ect Contingency 189,960 157,863 32 097
Total $1485,000 1 $1,044,660 1 $440,350.00
To dale, $1,044,650 or 70 percent of the project funds have been expended with
eight out of the twelve applications/projects completed. The total estimated
budget for ultimate migration to OneWorid, the relational database is $268,695 or
70 percent of the remaining budget of$440,350. Following is the projected
outlay for the remaining budget:
H M-IhK,N10mMF�HR1FNi2bFE8�RF.nbT'm^Tc1,.Jx
Rewea: 1 • Page 3
Allocation of
Remaining JDFJIBM
FIS Component CIP Budget
Completion of WoddVision
Installation:
Remaining Software
License Fees $43 695
Inventory Management
Phase II—O&M 29,440
Contract Management 12,800
Fixed Assets 25,600
Data Conversion 15,000
Technical Training 6,400
Project Management 14,400
Project contingency 24,320
Total Remaining of World.
Vision Project $171 666
OneWorld Migration:
OneWodd Software Fee $ 60,000
Consulting Services 158135
Training 26,800
Project Contingency 23,760
Total OneWorld Migration $268,695
Total Remainin Cost $440,360
HM9-®K1T W vnYNl RiNIleT£ESNRE,AerpmTrA!¢
1rs Page 4
CSDOC
FTE Requirement for Installation of New FIS System(1)
Mangement ENort Core T_, End Use
iM Person FTE Person FTE Payson Total
Phase I(BItA)6-iM197)4 mos.
Md..Book D. 31 laird 0.6W35 Lalm 0.04373 Slaves 1.01838
BudgeL Ch dI of Accounts.FIdI RW. 0 Must Wnito 0.17801 Cagle 0.01923 Evangliss 0.24599
Peymll 0,69692 White 3.2415D Ga99ie 0.0035 Jiminea 4.38581
Jinum. Aguilar
Aguilar
Human Resources D49050 Pelmmen 1.53058 Mitchell 0.173" Martin. 2.19415
Adams
Phase II(10/1A8-711197)9 coos.
General Lec,, 0.14539 Whhe 0.614D2 Dillon 0.05760 Johnson,B 0.73TU8
Accounts Payable 0,11305 Dillon 0.47570 AMtldbe 0.05870 Johnson,L 0.64749
Purohesing 0.15770 Dubcls 0]3351 YeroM 0.10413 Thorell O.9Ba34
COHman
Feery
Ph.III(311R7-1901/W)9 moo.
Job Coat 0.1INS White 0.58340 Dilkin 0.0760 Tibbs 0.76038
Inventory Management 0.11084 Dillon 0.50833 Fnderkks 0,07680 Simmons 0.76017
Sales Order 0.082" Dubois 0.34571 Taylor 0,05142 Hi9ashlmu a 0.47957
Focal Moore 0.12330 Dilon 0.4B59B Fndadcus 0.05870 Simmons 0.66799
Comoro Management 0.052 Duli 0.30920 Dubois 0.03886 Mi 0.4104(1
Lucho n
Work Order 0.08229 While 0.44497 Aldridge 0.06870 Forman 0.58596
Accounts Reoarveble 0.08972 Esbsr 0.38220 Weingarten 0.04855 Clean 0.53053
All Phases(9fl198-1213119T)16 nos.
SacuriryBOOort Writing 0.04923 Cable 0.04923 Evnsellen O.00000 0.09846
Total 2.71637 10A7312 1.314" 14.50446
Totals by Sb1B Parson:
Whhs 1.08313 1.05313
Pelmmen OA9050 0.49050
Dubois 0.30249 DAU63 0.46712
Laird 0.34401 0.63035 0.97465
Dillon o,usso 1.0742 1.44441
Eebar 0.09972 0,09972
Cagle 0.00B23 0.17801 0.22724
GegBia 1.09050 1.08050
Jilin. CORKI 0 0.224192 1.00469
Aguilar 1.08060 0.224192 1.31
Mitrh.vAch me 1.53058 1.0058
Aldridge 0.92068 0.92069
Yarosh 0.24450 0.244W
COHmen 0.24450 014,150
Fe0ry 0.24460 0.244W
Fredericis 1.05491 1.06401
Taylor 0.34571 0.34571
Engineering 0.15463 0.15,10
Weingarten 0.30226 0.38228
Evangelista 0.04923 0,01923 0.08846
Stave, 0.00373 0.04373
Marna 0.17308 0.17308
Johnson,B 0.05768 0.05796
J nwtml. 0.05870 0.05870
Thong 0.10413 0.10413
Tibbs 0.07000 0.07690
Simmons 0.13661 0.13501
Higeahimun 0.06142 0.06142
Marron 0.03880 0,03686
Foreman 0.05870 0.05070
Green 0.04855 0.04855
Total 2.71637 10.47312 1.31496 14.50446
(1).Fnroudas Oerdwen and soflwem information system technirosns.
Loving Beyond AS/400
J.D. Edwards looks to Unix, NT for growth and new cuslranters
BY,IONN L MYlOYi6N soks, ..'r ing III
'�-� SERVING THE SERVER
the Ymll,{I11C.
IUkI'S AS/41111 COMPUTER is J.D. o. grownnto "Fmurt' rev-
suppined o, he a pruprictarc lion business selling
enue growth is
product with slow gnx\th purer- applications software packages that run snMuntialh dc-
tial, but it's still managing to .Ir pendent upon
provide a gaW living for some branch out to Unix and Windows PVT mariner xccptnee,
companies. of Onc\l`rdd ap-
J.O. Edwards a Cs. (uww. plicstion suites
Ideswsrds.am), for isutanee, has baarrs wases
Yew eadr cam 71 saw and the ability to
=rl'v tripled in size in the past pa om ml Mh31 license Onel4orld
four Fars selling applications - application suites
1993 1991 3995 1998 19e1
packages for AS/400s, deriving to new cuAatnels,"
virtually all its so0w2re revenue 'waname S19G8 s3a08 5340.H Sj78 ;_f131a Edwards said in
from licensing. :..` -.. " -,...`"„- - ` the prospectus for
The company's products are hr Mama -$7.4 $121 31M $2&3 $14.4 its initial public
used to manage manufacturing, offering.Thecom-
finance, distribution and human pang sold 12.5
resource operations within mid- million shares as
size corporations. 33 percent to 5431.2 million for the part of an offering of 15.8 million
The Denver compam's ficens- nine months— ice revenue also shares, with an estimated price of
ing revenue was up 54 percent to was up 33 percent and 31 percent S23 per share.The price had been
S3S9 million for the three months for the quarterly and nine-month expected to be S13 to S17 per share.
ended July 31.compared with the periods,respectively. The compam' does nor expect
same period the year before. - Despite this. Edwards officials mam' of its existing AS/400
For the nine months ended believe—as mamy observers and eusmmers will move m Unix or
Julr 31, licensing revenue in- sofnare developers do—dun the NT platforms. so it's going to
camsed 37 percent m SISI mil- AS/400 has only minimal fume have ro find different buyers
lion.At the same tim4 profits rose grmvlh potential, so Edwards has for Oneltiorld.
49 percent to Si.2 million for the developed products for the lino Moving to finis and NT also
quarter and 66 perent for she and RSndovs NT markets Those is tracing other changes and
nincormuhstoS14.4m00on. packages,called Onel4orld,\tere in, challenges for the 20yxar-old
Total revenue rose 40 percent to traduced in late 1996,but Edwards vendor. whose business has been
SI62-3 million for the quarter and has way yet recorded any significant selling application packages for
IBM minicomputers.
Not only will it compete with
I companies such as System Soft.
ware Associates Inc.. Marcam
Corp.,Infinium Software Inc.and
JBA Holdings in the minicomputer
space, it will be facing the likes of
SAP AG. Bun Co,. PmpleSoft
Inc and Oracle. all of which arc
more experienced in the Unix and
NT markets.
Also. Edwards is changing its
traditional policy of subcontract-
ing; with third parties 1'ur swot
consulting and training scn iris it
1 provides m in cvatwmca.
The new strategy is to have
third parties ci)mracl d�iry�hy
with users m implement and sop-
pun OneWorld.
I II dw staavgy is successlld.it
I will likeh reduce revenue lium
consulting and training bectuw
subunuraciurs avcsum,d liu 40
l.men Id dam re\cnur in 11011.,
the a,mlalm said.
11 is coo nnlmnanl puinl. I'.d.
111188. nu n1 >
1
BEYOND has three components: an appli- l
cation lava,a tool set and a tech-
> eletteltl rill list 111 nulogy laver.
The application laver homes
wards incre ingly relies on set- business functions of the applies-
vices. Service revenue Crew PA) Linn suites. which an have up in
percent between 1993 and 19%. S.IgRI ohicers. A Omc\Cnrld senor
compared with a 91 percmr in. diuribures them in obiect than to
erase in lievnsing (ccx. Sc"i ev iroli,idual compuna tha orn,ile
now account f;w nearly hS percent and execute them. Objects an be
of revenue. modified ear changed and rxdistrib.
It is a Iowa margin business, uteri.reducing the cost of changes
and Edwards'profit margins have compared with other client/sorer
declined to 3.3 percent in 19% systems,the company,said.
from about S percent in 1993 ss The One World tool set gener-
services produced more of the am objects in C,C++ and Jay,
company's revenue. and new languages an be easily
Edwards has expertise in ar- incorporated.Edwards laid.Hav-
chitecrua, engineering, con- ing a single coal set instead of
l struetion,mining,real estate,en- multiple tools also reduces the
orgy,chemical companies and the cast to users,the company said.
public setter markets. The technology layer masks
differences between platforms and
Technology Layers provides a uniform interface to
Edwards laid it has more than OneWorld applications, so one
4,000 cmmomers in more than 90 object an run on a variety of plat-
countries. International sales ac- ferns,according to company offi-
count for about SS percent of Ed- cials. The technology lay" rums
wards' ramue, which is not sur- on AS/400s and S/390 main-
prising given the popularity of the fames; Digial Equipmmes AI-
AS/400 in international markets. pha and Inal-baud XT servers;
WorldSoftwue, one of Edwards' ISM's RS/6000; Hewlett-
main produces,is used in host-c Pickled's 9000;Sionens/Nixdorf
tric nermorks with the AS/700 sit. Unix servers; and NT servers
ling a the core of the installation. from other manuGamers
OmeR'nrld uses Edwards'Com- Clients include \Vmdows 95
purer Nerwork Computing(L 1C) and NT and any brayser, the
architecture to run over AS/40ft company said.
Unix and NT servers All three The technology also supports
kinds of servers can be combined Oracle's databases the ®M DB2
in an enterprise network. famly and.Miaoso0's SQL Serve.
WorldSofrwaa an be used to Edwards officials did not say
make run-time changes in appli- what the company will do with
ado. suites without having to the approximately S263 million it
recompile software. raised in its initial public offering.
Using Edwards' WorldV'tsion The three founders—chairman
thin-client interface, WorldSoft- C. Edward McVaney, and Jack
ware an run its applications Thompson and Robert Newman,
through a Windows GUI. bah dimccors—still own about 63
With CNC. One World an percent of the company after the
deploy a single version of an ap- offering.They sold about 2.16 ml-
pliatiun across a network. CNC lion shares in the IPO. v
FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting De To B&.
01/11/% 02/251%
AGENDA REPORT HamguinW IT�mti"
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager
Originator: Gary Streed, Tom Woodruff
SUBJECT: RETIREMENT BENEFITS FOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
As requested by the Committee Chair at the January Joint Boards meeting,
reconsider modifications to the Deferred Compensation program for Executive
Management, Management, Supervisory, Professional and Confidential
employees so that the incentive compensation heretofore called"employer
matching" and "employer non-matching contributions" be designated as
supplemental salary, a part of the total remuneration paid to the employee.
SUMMARY
The Orange County Employees Retirement System (OCERS) has recently
noted the Districts that, due to a recent California Supreme Court decision, they
are changing their past practice, and they will no longer consider certain deferred
compensation payments and deductions, for convenience previously called
"employer matching and non-matching contributions," as"compensation
earnable." This is a statutory term under the Retirement System Act to establish
an employee's earnings which are used to calculate retirement benefits.
The impact of this change will be to decrease the amount of annual salary used
to determine retirement benefits for approximately 175 current employees. While
the impacts vary based upon age, length of service and salary, an example of the
potential impact to an actual current employee who is eligible to retire today, is a
reduction of retirement benefits of$3,200 per year. That impact increases every
year the employee stays with the Districts, because the OCERS retirement
benefits increase based upon age and years of service.
Two changes are required to the Districts' deferred compensation program, in
order to maintain current retirement benefits:
• Clarification of language
• Removal of vesting provision
H1 E0 nF �AHTAHRR9FE8Y.`"lcvrp Off[
R. ,. Page 1
'f
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The OCERS is established under the IRS as a"defined benefit" retirement
pension plan. This means that the monthly benefit received at retirement is
predetermined by contract, while the contributions made during the employment
years may vary. Contributions to OCERS are made by both the employee and
the Districts. The required employee contributions are based upon age at entry
into the system, and are different for almost every employee. As a result of the
collective bargaining process, the Districts agreed in 1963 to pick up a 4.50%
share of each employee's required contribution in lieu of a salary adjustment. In
addition, the Districts' employer contributions for 1997-98 have been set by the
OCERS actuaries at 2.32% of"compensation earnable." The maximum OCERS
cost per employee to the Districts for including deferred compensation program
amounts in "compensation earnable" is $545.60, or 6.82% of$8,000.00 for 1998.
The average annual OCERS cost per employee in this program is less than
$150.00.
BUDGET IMPACT
® This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Issue
Whether the monies paid by the Districts to individual employees, in addition to
their regular base salary and deposited into the deferred compensation accounts
of the employees, constitute "compensation earnable" under the provisions of the
OCERS (Government Code Section 31461).
Historical Backaround
In 1976, the Directors asked staff to investigate various compensation incentives
for Management employees, and subsequently modified their existing deferred
compensation plan by adopting a program to include additional compensation
amounts to the employees, if those amounts were deposited into deferred
compensation plan accounts, and if a portion of the amounts was matched by the
employees. In 1986, this program was expanded to include supervisory and
professional staff as part of the change to a performance/merit based
compensation system that replaced the traditional five-step system for these
employees.
H",fttnTlO WVAHWMROAFFH1DRmp
R. 1rs Page 2
The IRS Code is very clear that deposits to a Section 457(a) deferred
compensation plan must be deductions from an employee's salary or wages.
Because of this, the Districts has always treated the incentive program of
deferred compensation 'contributions" as a part of gross wages for calculating
the amount of required OCERS contributions and Medicare premiums. Districts'
employees are not eligible for Social Security, but if they were, we would have
included these amounts in Social Security wages as well.
Attached to this report is a pertinent excerpt from the Plan Administrator's
Manual prepared and distributed by an independent deferred compensation
investment provider and manager. This manual explains that there cannot be
deferred compensation unless first there is compensation. Compensation that is
subject to Social Security, or FICA, should also be subject to OCERS.
OCERS staff and counsel, together with Districts' counsel, thoroughly reviewed
staffs practice of including deferred compensation as "compensation earnable,"
in 1986. At that time, Districts' staff prepared schedules and examples that
showed the flow of funds from the Districts into the employees' deferred
compensation accounts. One of the examples was an employee paycheck which
showed additions to regular wages labeled "ER MATCH" and ER NONMATCH,"
and a corresponding payroll deduction for the total. The logic and legality of
these transactions was clear to OCERS staff and counsel, and they so
acknowledged. Thus, retirement benefits for Districts' retirees since 1986 have
been based upon total "compensation earnable" as reported to OCERS, and
employees' paychecks have continued to show the gross earnings.
It appears that OCERS is now changing its position because the Supreme Court
ruled the law did not allow for these amounts to be added on the assumption that
the amounts were never treated as being paid to the employee and thereafter
deducted into the deferred compensation account.
That assumption, insofar as applied to the Districts' program over the past 21
years, is incorrect.
OCERS has indicated that if the monies paid to the Districts' employees is salary
and is deducted into the deferred compensation account, then it satisfies the
legal requirements and they will continue the past practice and accept these
sums. If so, the Districts' employees will not lose any benefits that they have
planned for.
The Districts' proposal to modify the Deferred Compensation Program Resolution
by simply changing the language to accurately reflect what has in fact been done
for the past years, removes the misleading inferences and should be satisfactory
to OCERS. The Districts and the employees have always paid the required
retirement contribution on the deferred compensation amounts, and, thus,
OCERS has not incurred any"shortfall."
N:M9,CYMnitlAovMiYlMl/JIABB1i®1UMwT-mc
wew: irsim Page 3
YB
Each year, OCERS sends its members a statement of account. In recent years,
these statements have included the employees' current average salary and an
estimated monthly retirement allowance when the employee reaches the age of
50. Both of these amounts are based upon "compensation eamable" which
includes all gross salary and wages deposited into the deferred compensation
plan. Employees and their families have used these amounts when planning for
their futures and making career decisions. They have a reasonable and well
established expectation that the practice will not change.
The Districts have a reasonable and well-established practice of including all
deferred compensation amounts as part of the total remuneration to an
employee, i.e., the gross compensation for OCERS, FICA and Medicare
premium calculations. The Social Security law requires deferred compensation
amounts be included when calculating employee and employer premiums; it has
been logical to extend that requirement and practice to the Districts' retirement
plan, OCERS. The Directors have an opportunity to maintain this practice and to
protect their staff from a reduction in retirement benefits which, for 21 years have
included total gross earnings.
Vesting Provisions
The deferred compensation program was intended to be implemented in stages.
The intent was to increase the additional salary percentages over time as an
incentive to retain Management employees. To reinforce this incentive, the
program also included a vesting requirement for the matching and non-matching
contributions. As the program was expanded to include additional employees,
the plan to increase the percentage was abandoned, but the vesting period was
maintained.
The current vesting requirement is participation in the program for three years.
After three years, all past and future amounts will be paid to the employee upon
termination of participation.
In 1996, the Internal Revenue Code was changed regarding Section 457
deferred compensation plans. One of the important changes requires employers
to transfer all deferred compensation funds to a trustee or custodial account.
Prior language left ownership of all of the funds with the employer. General
Counsel has stated that requirements for a trustee relationship have probably
made our vesting requirement unenforceable.
Additionally, maintaining the vesting provision will be contrary to the intent of the
language changes previously discussed. The intent of the language changes is
to clarify that the amounts are first paid to the employee and then deferred. To
insist that an employee wait some period of time before the funds are available,
will not allow these funds to qualify as"compensation eamable° under the terms
of the recent California Supreme Court ruling.
H."neunv,00.�uwsuwess�o.aec
Page 4
Y
ALTERNATIVES
Maintain the current deferred compensation program language and wait for the
legal system to resolve inconsistencies state wide, within Orange County or at
the Districts. This option will likely result in reduced retirement benefits/payments
for Districts' employees and could expose the agency to litigation.
CEQA FINDINGS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
1. Excerpt from Deferred Compensation Plan Administrators Manual
2. General Counsel Memo dated January 13, 199B
3. Draft Resolution Approving Amended Deferred Compensation Program
GGS:lc
H saamanv,a�u,msuweev��a.ax
naea: sae Page 5
f
Excerpt From Deferred Compensation Administrator's Manual
"Employee and Employer Contributions"
V. Employer Coatrantdoru to Section 457 Pfs:na
Section 457 Plana are by nature vohmeary salary reduction agreements, In the cone of"employer
a:mnibtrdonz"t�'a pexcts seine ad�risVative pe:.:llariaes that must be addresses)for an employer
eonurbutiou to be male.
First, it is rec amended that the employer's plan document address the iwue of employer
contributions. UCs Specimen Piart Document provides that an employer may add to the amount
payable to any participant cov-sad under the plan. While this provision leaves the contribution at the
employer's d saedom, the employer may wish to be more specific regarding die amntms it will
canmbute under the plarL For etample, an employer may choose to contribute 2% of each employee 3
pay and could make this a speeiflc plan provision.provided it Is subject to the normal plan limitations.
Several additional haccora must be considered witm the employer elects to matte a tontribudon to a
Section 457 plm
L Rnce all deposits made to the plan mun come by way of employee talary reduction,the
only vny an employer can make a contr]mdou for an employee Is by"grossmg up"or
increasing the employee's salary by the amount the employer wishes to contribute to the
plea This In effect means the aruployee Is paid additional"wages"which they then
elm to defer into the plan.
2. i7>: " " employer mrYn'6udon u�71 be subjeC to Socha Security taxation up front
just u normal employee deferrak sure. 2'his 6teea<e in FICA ages as .ey are s own
as the LU•2 Form wi11 almost always result in an additional FICA tine liability for the
°mplayw on their portion of the 4S7 contribution. The amount of the to liability wi!1
depend on whather the employee has exceeded the FICA Eatable wa}e base for the year.
If the FICA wage base HAS been reached, Medicare tat vr'll probably mill need to be
withheld.
V•3
4
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
PROGRAM FOR EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP
EMPLOYEES AND MANAGEMENT, SUPERVISORY
PROFESSIONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR THE EXECUTIVE
MANAGEMENT GROUP EMPLOYEES (GENERAL
MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGERS AND
DEPARTMENT HEADS) AND MANAGEMENT,
SUPERVISORY, PROFESSIONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICTS, AND REPEALING
RESOLUTION NO. 95-81
. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the Districts' Deferred Compensation Plan, the
Districts, by Resolution No. 95-81, adopted by the Boards of Directors on July 26, 1995,
have previously approved specified Districts' payments of salary compensation to
classes of employees in addition to the base salary for the employees, which payments
consisted of contributions to the individual deferred compensation accounts of the
General Manager, Assistant General Managers and Department Heads (collectively
described as the "Executive Management Group'), and certain Management,
Professional and Supervisory employees of the Districts.
NOW THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
2093-IN
57538 1
WS&S Drefl No 2
Fcbm 3.1989
D
DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER:
Section 1: Supplemental Salary.
A. General Manager and AssisianL eral Managers. That the
Districts hereby approve the payment, to the General Manager and to each Assistant
General Manager, of supplemental salary in an annual sum equal to the maximum
permissible dollar amount of deferred compensation under an IRC Section 457 deferred
compensation plan, as prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code or U.S. Treasury
Department Regulations (the "Supplemental Salary for General/Assistant General
Managers'), which shall be in addition to the base salary. The Supplemental Salary for
General/Assistant General Managers shall be first added to the base salary, and then
deducted therefrom and deposited into the respective individual deferred compensation
accounts of the General Manager and each of the Assistant General Managers.
B. Department Heads. That the Districts hereby approve the payment
of supplemental salary, in an annual sum equal to a maximum of three (3%) percent of
the gross annual base salary of each Department Head (the "Matching Supplemental
Salary for Department Heads'), provided that each such employee voluntarily withholds
from his/her salary and contributes an equal sum to his/her individual deferred
compensation account. The Matching Supplemental Salary for Department Heads shall
be first added to the base salary, and then deducted therefrom and deposited into the
respective individual deferred compensation accounts of the Department Heads.
That the Districts hereby approve the additional payment of supplemental salary,
2093-IN
575381
WS&S Dreft No 3 Z
kbm 3.1998
in an annual sum equal to three (3%) percent of the gross annual base salary of each
Department Head (the "Non-Matching Supplemental Salary for Department Heads'),
exclusive of the Matching Supplemental Salary for Department Heads, as hereinabove
described, without the requirement of any matching contribution by the individual
employees. The Non-Matching Supplemental Salary for Department Heads shall be
first added to the base salary, and then deducted therefrom and deposited into the
respective individual deferred compensation accounts of the Department Heads.
That in the event the total annual sum contributed to the individual deferred
compensation account of a Department Head, comprised of the three (3%) percent
Non-Matching Supplemental Salary for Department Heads, the three (3%) percent
Matching Supplemental Salary for Department Heads, and the three (3%) percent
matching funds contributions from the respective employee, exceeds the maximum
permissible dollar amount of deferred compensation under an IRC Section 457 deferred
compensation plan, as prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code or U.S. Treasury
Department Regulations, the Districts shall continue to provide the three (3%) percent
Non-Matching Supplemental Salary for Department Heads, and the three (3%) percent
Matching Supplemental Salary for Department Heads, to the extent that such total
Matching/Non-Matching Supplemental Salary for Department Heads does not exceed
the maximum allowed by law, and the individual employee shall only be required to
contribute such matching funds contributions as will provide a total of all contributions
that will equal the maximum allowed by law.
2093-IM
52539 1
Ws Dm0 N92 3
Pob v 3,1998
C. Management and Supervlsory Employees. That the Districts
hereby approve the payment of supplemental salary, in an annual sum equal to a
maximum of two (2%) percent of the gross annual base salary of the respective
Management and Supervisory employees (collectively the "Matching Supplemental
Salary for Management and Supervisory Employees"), provided each such employee
voluntarily withholds from his/her salary and contributes an equal sum to his/her
individual deferred compensation account. The Matching Supplemental Salary for
Management and Supervisory Employees shall be first added to the base salary, and
then deducted therefrom and deposited into the respective individual deferred
compensation accounts of the Management and Supervisory Employees.
That the Districts hereby approve the additional payment of supplemental salary,
in an annual sum equal to two (2%) percent of the gross annual base salary of each of
the respective Management and Supervisory employees described herein (the "Non-
Matching Supplemental Salary for Management and Supervisory Employees"),
exclusive of the Matching Supplemental Salary for Management and Supervisory
Employees amount, as hereinabove described, without the requirement of any
matching contribution by the individual employees. The Non-Matching Supplemental
Salary for Management and Supervisory employees shall be first added to the base
salary, and then deducted therefrom and deposited into the respective individual
deferred compensation accounts of the Management and Supervisory employees.
D. Professional and Confidential Employees. That the Districts
20 3-I W
57528 1
WS Daft N0.2 4
kbry 2,IW8
e
hereby approve the payment of supplemental salary, in an annual sum equal to a
maximum of one (1%) percent of the gross annual base salary of the respective
Professional and Confidential employees (collectively the "Matching Supplemental
Salary for Professional and Confidential Employees"), provided each such employee
voluntarily withholds from his/her salary and contributes an equal sum to his/her
individual deferred compensation account. The Matching Supplemental Salary for
Professional and Confidential Employees shall be first added to the base salary, and
then deducted therefrom and deposited into the respective individual deferred
compensation accounts of the Professional and Confidential Employees.
That the Districts hereby approve the additional payment of supplemental salary,
in an annual sum equal to two (2%) percent of the gross annual base salary of each of
the respective Professional and Confidential employees described herein (the "Non-
Matching Supplemental Salary for Professional and Confidential Employees"), exclusive
of the Matching Supplemental Salary for Professional and Confidential Employees
amount, as hereinabove described, without the requirement of any matching
contribution by the individual employees. The Non-Matching Supplemental Salary for
Professional and Confidential employees shall be first added to the base salary, and
then deducted therefrom and deposited into the respective individual deferred
compensation accounts of the Professional and Confidential employees.
E. Vesting. All Supplemental Salary, as described in Paragraphs A,
B, C and/or D above, shall vest upon deduction from the total compensation (the sum of
2N3.1W
S7558 1
WS&S Nrefi No 2 5
Rbm 5,M8
e
S
base salary plus supplemental salary) payment and deposit into the respective
individual deferred compensation accounts. In addition, all amounts described in
Resolution No. 95-81 as "Districts Matching Funds Contributions" or "Districts Non-
Matching Funds Contributions" that have been previously deposited into the respective
individual deferred compensation accounts of the employees described in that
Resolution, shall be deemed vested as of the date of this Resolution. Once
Supplemental Salary, as described in Paragraphs A, B, C and/or D above, and Districts
Matching Funds Contributions and Districts Non-Matching Funds Contributions, as
described in Resolution No. 95-81, have vested as described in this Paragraph E, they
may thereafter be withdrawn only to the extent otherwise permitted under the Deferred
Compensation Plan.
Section 2: This program shall be for the benefit of the employees comprising
the Executive Management Group (General Manager, Assistant General Managers and
Department Heads) and Management, Supervisory, Professional and Confidential
employees. The employment classifications of those employees are set forth on
Attachment "1", which is incorporated herein by reference, and shall be terminated only
by action of the Boards of Directors. In the event other classifications are added to the
category of Executive Management Group and Management, Supervisory, Professional
and Confidential employees by action of the General Manager or Boards of Directors of
Districts, said classifications shall be deemed to be governed by this Resolution
concurrently therewith.
208M W
57538 1
W8 D ft Nn.2 6
FOb 3,M&
Section : The General Manager and Director of Human Resources are
hereby authorized to execute individual Deferred Compensation Participation
Agreements with each eligible employee, and are further authorized to execute any and
all documents relating to investment and payment transactions relating to the Deferred
Compensation Plan, provided that such documents are approved as to form by the
Districts' General Counsel.
Section 4: Resolution No. 95-81 is hereby repealed, and the provisions herein
shall become effective upon adoption of this Resolution. The provisions herein shall
remain in effect until amended or terminated by Resolution of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1998.
30 -IN
9198 1
WS Drefl Not 7
F.Wry 3,1999
i
ATTACHMENT "t"
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP
General Manager
Assistant General Manager
Department Heads:
A. Director of Communications
B. Director of Engineering
C. Director of Finance
D. Director of General Services Administration
E. Director of Human Resources
F. Director of Information Technology
G. Director of Maintenance & Operations
H. Director of Technical Services
MANAGEMENT
Controller
Financial Manager
Construction Manager
Engineering Manager
Environmental Compliance & Monitoring Manager
Laboratory Manager
Source Control Manager
Chief Scientist
Accounting Manager
Chief Operator
Safety & Emergency Response Manager
Maintenance Manager
Operations Manager
Contracts & Purchasing Manager
Secretary to the Boards of Directors
Training Manager
Human Resources Manager
7538_w3-i1
I
W$&5 Dnfl No 1 8
Febnury 3,1998
t
SUPERVISORY
Engineering Supervisor
Environmental Management Supervisor
Senior Engineer
Compliance Supervisor
Laboratory Supervisor
Senior Scientist
Senior Operations Supervisor
Maintenance Supervisor
Operations Supervisor
Principal Accountant
Principal Financial Analyst
Source Control Supervisor
Supervising Construction inspector
Training Supervisor
Foreman
Maintenance Planner
Supervising Buyer
Supervising Source Control Inspector
2"9 -wo
9518 1
WMS Dre nog 9
Fcbw 3,1"8
3 PROFESSIONAL
Engineer
Principal administrative Assistant
Principal Engineering Associate
Project Specialist
Regulatory Specialist
Scientist
Associate Engineer III
Principal Environmental Specialist
Programmer Analyst
Computer Hardware Specialist
Telecommunications Specialist
Senior Human Resources Analyst
Principal Laboratory & Research Analyst
Senior Administrative Assistant
Associate Engineer II
Senior Accountant
Senior Financial Analyst
Safety Representative
Programmer
Associate Engineer I
Human Resources Analyst
Accountant
Buyer
Financial Analyst
CONFIDENTIAL
Executive Assistant II
Executive Assistant I
Human Resources Assistant
2W3-108
57538 1
WMS Deft Not t()
FsE ,3.MS
FAHR COMMITTEE MeengDke Toaee:.
02/n/99 02/25/99
AGENDA REPORT IDemyymE r I )VuvmGe
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Michael D. White, Controller
SUBJECT: MID-YEAR FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT
PREPARED BY STAFF FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Committee review, approve and forward the 1997-98
Mid-Year Report to the Joint Boards.
SUMMARY
Attached in a separately bound document is the Districts' Mid-Year Report for the
period ended December 31, 1997. This report is a consolidation of both the
financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts at the mid-point of the
1997-98 fiscal year.
Contained within the Mid-Year Financial Report are budget summary reviews of
the Joint Operating & Working Capital Funds, the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund,
individual Districts, and the self-insurance funds. Also contained within this
report are the status of the divisional performance objectives and work plan
milestones identified in the 1997-98 Approved Budget.
As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 48.65 percent or
$21,358,000 of the 1997-98 net joint operating budget of$43.9 million has been
expended. Net costs have decreased 6.31 percent in comparison with the same
period last year.
The total cost per million gallons at December 31, 1997 is $468.64 based on
flows of 45,574 million gallons. This is $22, or 4.5 percent below the revised
budgeted cost per million gallons of$490.95.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
1MCm1N1A1M ,MftV1Qcn, AHWAN�EBWI WARJ
R.,:.,: 1rs Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ATTACHMENTS
1. Districts' Mid-Year Financial and Operational Report for the period ended
December 31, 1997
'Mbntl41Y.'V.mW12,0aaMfIJIRFN�A4v'EBVAdYMM.E¢
Page 2
MINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Tok atla.
02/25/ga
AGENDA REPORT Item Number IeCCJJbN tw
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Bill Brooks, Engineer
SUBJECT: RELOCATION OF LIDO PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 541-1
BID DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1998
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation;
2. Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2 & 3 to the plans and specifications;
3. Award a Contract to Advanco Constructors for Relocation of Lido Pump Station,
Contract No. 541-1, for an amount to not exceed $2,196,376;
4. Increase the budget allocation from $1,395,000 to $2.636.381;
5. Authorize execution of an Easement Agreement with City of Newport Beach,
increasing the previously approved purchase price of$56,300 to $78,886.
SUMMARY
The relocation of Lido Pump Station is required to accommodate the widening of
Newport Boulevard as a part of the City of Newport Beach's Arches Improvement
Project. Plans and Specifications for the Relocation of Lido Pump Station were
approved by the County Sanitation District No. 5 (CSD5) Board of Directors on
November 19, 1997.
Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 were required to change the bid date and provide technical
clarifications. The Engineer's Estimate for construction excluding all Addenda is
$1,650,000. After going to bid, CSD5 staff modified the construction schedule for
work in the City streets at the request of the City Engineer. This impacted the
construction cost due to scheduling, traffic control and sewer work in the city streets.
Other items that were added for public safety and reliability included improved
shoring systems, additional piping and valves, more comprehensive pump station
testing and additional electrical materials and instrumentation requirements.
Collectively, these items added approximately $400,000 to the project after the final
Engineer's Estimate was received. On February 3, 1998, the low bid was received
from Advanco Constructors in the amount of$2,196,376.
1Yeaa�0alalN,glo�alNgenea paM1 RpPoHV0n190Yatl5.<LIO63 d-
RnifeE ,nvea Page 1
CSD5 staff recommends approval of the Easement Agreement. The Easement `
Agreement provides CSD5 with permanent rights to construct, operate and maintain
the pump station, pipelines and appurtenances. The Easement Agreement also
modifies the February 26, 1997 Cooperation and Reimbursement Agreement
between the City of Newport Beach and CSD5.
The budget is being increased as a result of the revised purchase price for the
easement and the construction bid price.
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The original adopted budget of$699,600 for construction of the project was
underestimated. Items that led to an incorrect estimate included preliminary
quantities that were low for the lengths of sewer and force main, the number and
cost of District manholes, shoring and dewatering costs, and a mechanical pumping
system that was undersized. A larger pumping system was required because the
newly widened Newport Boulevard Bridge will support a new force main at a much
higher elevation than the existing force main under the Newport Channel.
Consequently, the cost of electrical and control systems were underestimated based
on the preliminary undersized mechanical equipment. The construction budget was
not revised until after completion of design. The design consultant should have
notified the Districts of the low preliminary estimate and budget prior to completion of
the 60 % design.
On November 19, 1997, the CSD5 Board of Directors approved the plans and
specifications and adopted a budget of$1,200,000 for construction of the project.
District staff based the $1,200,000 Engineer's Estimate on verbal communication
with the consultant. The project was fast-tracked to accommodate the City of
Newport Beach's Arches Project and had to be advertised in November to prevent
construction impacts to the City at the intersection of Newport Boulevard and Short
Street. District staff received the Engineer's Estimate of$1,650,000 after
preparation of the Agenda Item Transmittal for the November Board and changed
the Engineers Estimate on the bid tabulation and made the contractors aware of the
increased estimate.
Addenda Nos. 2 and 3 were prepared to mitigate potential impacts to the City of
Newport Beach residents. At the request of the City Engineer, the District modified
the construction of the sewers and force mains in Newport Boulevard and Short
Street to occur after Labor Day 1998 and to allow no construction during the boat
parade in December. This will minimize traffic impacts to the City residents and the
public during peak traffic periods. Unfortunately, this had an effect on the bid prices
for the work because the contractor will need to accommodate this time in his
schedule. In addition, the District specified a steel sheet shoring system under the
direction of the geotechnical consultant. This improved shoring system will ensure
an excavation with less potential for settlement and adverse impacts to adjacent
structures. Other changes that occurred after advertising for bids were driven by the
District's decision to standardize on plant automation control systems and
programming for the pump stations. This will provide the CSD5 personnel with a
modem, state-of-the-art facility with adequate safeguards to prevent a sewage spill,
\WiEWaY,N10bNMOenEa NaX flew, .,BeaNaW I.,OA O:[
Ra.,am vase Page 2
s
like what occurred at the Bay Bridge Pump Station. Collectively, these addenda
changes added approximately $400,000 to the Engineers Estimate based on a letter
dated February 4, 1998.
See attached "Budget Information Table'.
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: District 5 CIP/Reliability,
Item No. 2)
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Additional funds required for the project will be budgeted next fiscal year from the
CSD5 reserves.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The CSD5 Board of Directors approved the plans and specifications on November
19, 1997. Addendum No. 1 changed the bid date from January 6, 1998 to
February 3, 1998. Addenda Nos. 2 and 3 included revisions to the design of the City
of Newport Beach gravity sewers, revisions to traffic control to accommodate City of
Newport Beach, a Caltrans encroachment permit rider, (est. cost$40,000)and
associated changes to the specifications. A steel sheet pile shoring system was
specified to reduce potential settlement to adjacent property structures (est cost
$105,000), and a temporary security fence was added (est. cost$5.000)for
additional safety of City residents. Additional piping and valves for by-passing the
flowmeter and potable water testing (est. cost$40,000)were added per
maintenance requests. More stringent pump testing requirements (est. cost
$25,000)were added to prevent coordination problems with various suppliers of the
pumps, motors and electrical appurtenances. Electrical material requirements and
spare parts (est. cost$70,000)were added per electrical maintenance requests.
There were additional requirements for the instrumentation software, programming,
computer, and database generation to meet plant automation standards (est. cost
$115,000) and safeguards to prevent sewage spillage. The Engineering Estimate
also did not provide contractor overhead for the specified contract duration of 420
calendar days. Collectively, these items added $550.000 to the Engineers Estimate
per letter from consultant dated 2-4-98.
The Easement Agreement includes a purchase price revision for the easement from
$56,300 to$78,886,which reflects the true proportional cost of the easement area to
the cost of the city parcel. The easement area for the pump station and control
building is slightly larger than the originally conceived easements. In addition, the
City of Newport Beach will reimburse CSD5 for city sewers, sewer rehabilitation,
manholes, traffic control and appurtenances that are constructed by CSD5 under
Contract No. 5-41-1 for the City. These items were added to the CSD5 project for
their convenience. The amount of reimbursement is $112,200 as identified in Line
Items Nos. 8, 11 and 12 in the CSD5 schedule of prices.
NeXbO1FIpImfNgenN IXall FepaNVoml BwtlaW 1.1 pM9ppp[
R—. ,,,s„ Page 3
0
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost effective alternatives for this compliance project with the City of
Newport Beach. Any delay in the award of the contract will severely impact the
construction schedule of the City's project.
CEQA FINDINGS
Negative Declaration No. 97111079 approved on 1-26-98 by City of Newport Beach.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation
2, Budget Information Table
N[aTLaIv1YIpgWMpgM pill Pepw4\bmlBurCaW11 p]Q10B.Gpc
R-.« 111y Page 4
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Relocation of Lido Pump Station
Contract No. 5-41-1
ORIfiINAL CURRENT PROMSED ED �� �FUNDB �THIS �ROPOSED� ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECTITASK ADOPTEi� PROJ9CT BUDGET REVISED AUTNOR�2ED AUTHORVATYO�! iTOTAL� E%PENDRURE COMPLETE.,
BUDGET V"BUDGET INCaE'A8E BUDGETTO bATEi f �6' REONE8T r AUT ORe TION fr YO DAT', TO DATE(%)
�I 1gh,4� ?y "kfhjtuiat > ..
REIMBURSE CITY
FOR DESIGN $ 172,100 $ 172,100 - 9 172,100 It 172,100 - It 172.100 0%
DESIGN
MANAGEMENT $ 56,000 It 56.000 - $ 56,000 $ 66.000 - $ 56.0001 $ 56,000 1009/6
PURCHASE
EASEMENT $ 56,300 $ 56.300 $ 22,686 It 78,886 ! $ 56,300 $ 22,588 It 78.886 0%
LIDO PUMP
STATION
CONSTRUCTION $ 699,600 $ 1,200,000 It 998,376 $ 2.196.376 - $ 2,196,376 $ 2,196,376 0%
CHANGE ORDER
CONTINGENCY E 109,819 It 109.819 - $ 109.819 S 109.619 0%
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT $ 90,000 It 90,000 1 $ 90,000 $ 90.000 - $ 90,000 1 0%
CONTRIBUTION i'
FROM CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH It (179,000) $ (179.000) - It (179,000) $ 179,000) - $ (179,000) 0%
CITY
REIMBURSEMENT
TO CSD5 FOR CITY
SEWERS $ —112,200 $••112.200 $ - $ "112,200 $ ••112,200 0%
TOTAL $ 895,000 $ 7,395,400 $1,240,9811 $2,636,361 $ 195.400 $2,440,981 $2,638,381 1 $ 56000 4%
• It is anticipated that additional design costs may be incurred. The design consultant had a budget overrun due to changes in design
and preparation of addenda,but Dishict staff have not received final design costs from the City.
•'CSD5 will be reimbursed by City upon completion of project. gMNybbafN de draft re,,Ws4oiM"Wsbb6bl.Ms
a
m�
February 3, 1998
11:00 a.m.
ADDENDA:
BID TABULATION
Contract No. 5-41-1
PROJECT TITLE RELOCATION OF LIDO PUMP STATION
PROJECT
DESCRPfION: 5-41-1
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE $1,650,000 BUDGET AMOUNT: $1.200.000
TOTAL
CONTRACTOR BID
1. ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS $2.196.376
2. TM ENGINEERING $2,379,310
3. HPS PLUMBING SERVICES $2,445.293
4. PASCAL& LUDWIG ENGINEERS $2,473,000
5. KIEWIT PACIFIC $2.475.809_
6. GRFFITH COMPANY $2,667,880
7. CLARKE CONTRACTING CORP. $3,297,848
8.
9.
10.
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the =A. n,
t the low bid is a responsible
bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to ADVANC bid amount of $2,196,376
as the lowest and best bid.
Director of Enpineerinp
HAVIRDTAXENG1E MS-41.I\aIDTA6
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS - DISTRICT NO. 7 Meebng Date To ads.
02/25/98
AGENDA REPORT Ram NuM Iayumber
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
SUBJECT: CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEE FOR PROPOSED PROJECT
IN CITY OF ORANGE, DISTRICT NO. 7
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive, file, and deny request by Greubel Company to classify the proposed
residential development as commercial for the purpose of assessing capital facilities
connection fees based upon the provisions of the established ordinance.
SUMMARY
Jerome Greubel, on behalf of Greubel Company, has requested that the proposed
senior citizens residential development at 340 North Newport Avenue, Orange,
California, be classified as commercial, rather than residential, in an effort to receive a
lower capital facilities connection charge. See attached letter from Mr. Greubel, dated
January 8, 1998.
The proposed residential development consists of 87 individual dwelling units. Each
self-contained, rental unit has a full kitchen with range, oven, refrigerator, dishwasher,
and garbage disposal, and one or two full baths, each with a shower, sink, and toilet. In
reviewing the plans for the project with the developer, the Director of Engineering has
determined that the proposed project is not unlike a residential apartment complex in its
design and function, and in particular to its relative impact on the Districts' wastewater
collection and treatment system. Under the current ordinance, the Director of
Engineering does not find any special design issue or circumstance that would allow the
classification of the proposed development as commercial, as requested by
Mr. Greubel. This finding was summarized in a letter to Mr. Greubel dated
January 14, 1998 (see attached).
The current ordinance, adopted by the Board of Directors of District No. 7, does not
differentiate between a senior rental development and other residential developments.
Furthermore, the ordinance contains no authority to administratively waive or change
the fee that is established by the ordinance.
Staff recommends that the request by Greubel Company to classify the proposed
residential development as commercial be denied based upon the provisions of the
current Board adopted ordinance.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
Not applicable.
c�iyianaiwy�.aa oon a.00n:uam m.nmzzssec+xi am
er,ua ,�e9e Page 1
r
BUDGET IMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
If the proposed project is classified as residential, a total capital facilities connection fee
of$195,054 would be payable to District No. 7. This is based on a per unit basis; 87
dwelling units x $2,360 per dwelling unit minus five percent (5%) retained by the City of
Orange for processing and administration per our agreement with the City.
If the proposed project is classified as commercial, a total capital facilities connection
fee of$36,760 would be payable to District No. 7. This is based on a square footage
basis; 81,982 square feet x $472 per 1,000 square feet minus five percent (5%) retained
by the City of Orange for processing and administration.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ALTERNATIVES
1. The Board of Directors can enact an amendment to the Ordinance after notice
and hearing, specifying the exact amount and the reasons for a reduced fee, as
determined to be appropriate.
2. The Board of Directors can find that the proposed project is, in fact, a commercial
development and that the appropriate capital facilities connection fees be paid.
See attached memorandum from General Counsel to District No. 7 Board of Directors.
CEOA FINDINGS
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Letter from Greubel Company to Penny Kyle, dated January 8, 1998.
2. Letter from David Ludwin, Director of Engineering, to Greubel Company, dated
January 14, 1998.
3. Memorandum from General Counsel to District No. 7 Board of Directors, dated
February 4, 1998.
G NipiocaMpewa pary RewmVam 9aarmNZ}5gp Grvle�Eo,
R. ,� Page 2
GREUBEL COMPANY
Oeveiepment PrvPprty Meno➢ement
January 8, 1999
Ms.Panay Kyle
Secretary to the Bond of Director
District 7
Orange Comely Sanitation District —
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 _
Re: 340 North Newport Avenue,Oraogq CA-Orange Perk Heights
Dear Ms.Kyle:
The following oircumsmuuces have been provided for your review an that a f c assessment
designation may be made to appropriately assess the above refacnred project.
The Greubel Company submitted and was approved to mna4rtct a senior cirhma tare facility
with approximately 80,000 sgr>am fat of building,iximding 87 individual living®its. Each
unit has a full&Wg,bath and kimhm ame. In addition,the project includes the following
facilities:
1. Administrative Office
2. Medical Exam Room
3. Dining Room
4. Reraeation Room
5. CompukJGetae Room
6. Purified Water Distribution
7. MediwR eater Room
8. Full Haadicap Atxess throughout Site
9. 24-Hour Staffing and Security
10. Mail Room
11. Housekeeping and laundry Service
12. One pau3ang space per living unit
13. 1-Flom:crmmuctioa will,2-hour separations and double loaded interior halls,with a
comrm=ial fire sprinkler system
14. Five floor hydraulic elevator system
pia w. c,lnamnN AVCNtR • paaVr£. CAL NIA 92888 -nl4r 771{0OO r" (7141 771�000
Ms.Peony Kyle
Orange County Sanitation District
January 8, 1998
Page Two
is addition to the brand commercial design,the project is located in the C-1 Commercial Zone
within the City of Orange,directly adjacent to a commercial shopping center. The General Plan
designation for the site is G-C(General Commercial). This type of development would typically
generate far less demand on the sanitation redid dux to the limited fixture units Per living
space and the regulated age of the occupants.
We request that this project given its conditions,be assessed under the commercial rate —
structure.
Sincerely,
Jerome Greabel
Gwnermevetoper
MAU
TOTAL P.02
1 y
d% }
45 . {
Ty.
ZT �
(F
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Y�y!;
January 14, 1998
g
eez2an i. Jerome Greubel
Greubel Company
Pde�k e127- 570 W. Chapman Avenue
e2i'BaizY Orange, CA 92668
e s.
aaro.a
i ,
ri& D1a;: SUBJECT: Proposed Development at 340 North Newport Avenue, Orange,
California, Orange Park Heights
.mevp Based on our recent conversations, our meeting of January 9, the draft,
° unsigned letter you submitted to me and the plans you reviewed with me, it is
my determination that your proposed development should be classified as
residential. Thus the development will be subject to a facilities connection fee
°Warn„' of$2340 per residential dwelling unit.
9roe:;
ue7e�arL'
�Ygreu'; The information you provided to me indicates that each of the 87 rental units
mrwan,q: has a full kitchen with range, oven, refrigerator, dishwasher and garbage
disposal and one or two full baths including shower, lavatory and water closet.
na p
Even though the project has several communal facilities such as a recreation
e9me
room and mailroom, and it will be rented to senior citizens only, it is not unlike a
aa° residential apartment complex. Our current Connection Permits/Capital
Facilities Connection charges ordinance does not differentiate between your
lecenrie y;
°"vMp type of proposed development and other residential developments.
YP P P P P
STenFon
usb2
As I discussed with you, staff does not have the authority to waive any portion of
°bnde our ordinance; therefore, if you wish to pursue this issue further, you will need
to PA tion the Board of Directors of District No. 7. Please contact Penny Kyle,
!: S etary to the oard of Directors if you wish to pursue that option.
'e to D*a cte
an
riOan,M°N.
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
=warar:Di.r,:cu Director of Engineering
9 g
1Mnd fleneh
DAL:jam
H:".dla`engkMvnanakerbrange.doc
Y-,
C: B. Anderson
P. Kyle
T. Woodruff
Harry Thomas (City of Orange)
��� A Pufrlc Wastawamr and Enrronmen[al Management Agency Dommiued 10 Prorecong me Environment Srnce 1954
Table of Contents
Section1 - Overview........................................................................................................1
Financial Report-
Section 2 - Joint Operating &Working Capital Budget Review
Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department..................................................1
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge.......................................................2
.. Summary of Expenses by Major Category............................................................4
Summary of Expenses by Line Item......................................................................5
Summary of Revenue by Line Item.......................................................................7
Comparison of Expenses by Department..............................................................a
Comparison of Expenses Incurred by Quarter by Line Item .................................9
r Chart of Staffing Trends......................................................................................11
Section 3 - Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Graphs by Type and Funding Source..................1
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Current Year.....................2
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Project Life .......................6
r
Section 4 - Budget Review by Districts
Summary Budget Reviews-All Districts...............................................................1
r District No. 1 Budget Review.................................................................................2
District No. 2 Budget Review.................................................................................3
District No. 3 Budget Review.................................................................................4
r District No. 5 Budget Review.................................................................................5
District No. 6 Budget Review.................................................................................6
DistrictNo. 7 Budget Review.................................................................................7
District No. 11 Budget Review ..............................................................................8
District No. 13 Budget Review...............................................................................9
District No. 14 Budget Review.............................................................................10
r
Section 5 - Self Insurance Funds Budget Reviews
Public Liability Fund Budget Review.....................................................................1
Workers' Compensation Budget Review...............................................................2
.. Operational Report
r Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plans......................................................1
1997-98 Mid Year Report L
L
L
1 '
L
L
L
L
This Page Left Intentionally Blank. L
L
U
i
U
L
L
L
Li
jl
v
L
Overview
Mid-Year Financial & Operational Report
December 31, 1997
The Finance Department is pleased to present the 1997-98 mid-year comprehensive
., financial and operational report. This report consolidates the financial and operational
accomplishments of the Districts with the intent of providing the Directors, staff, and the
general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the Districts,
report on the status of all capital projects in progress, and provide detailed analysis on
the status of each Division's 1997-98 performance objectives as established in the
1997-98 adopted budget. A summary of the sections contained within this report is
provided below.
Joint Operating 8 Working Capital Budget Review: At December 31, 1997, 48.65
percent, or$21,358,000 of the 1997-98 revised net joint operating budget of$43.9
million has been expended. This is a net decrease in costs of 6.31 percent, or $1.4
million from the same period last year.
The total cost per million gallons at December 31, 1997 is $468.64 based on flows of
45,574 million gallons. This is $22, or 4.5 percent below the revised budgeted cost per
million gallons of$490.95 while flows are two percent higher than budgeted.
Both the net joint operating budget and the budgeted cost per million gallons were
revised by the Steering Committee following the issuance of the first quarter report. In
this report, it was shown that the budgeted cost per million gallons of$524.73 could
now be reduced by $33.78 to $490.95 as result of the additional operational overhead
costs that were being allocated out to either the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund or
directly to the individual District Funds. This additional overhead allocation was the
collective result of(1) benchmarking studies with other comparative agencies that
identified costs that the Districts were including as part of the cast per million gallons
calculation that other agencies were treating as overhead subject to allocation, and (2)
the refinement of the Districts cost allocation plan as a result of the implementation of
the new financial information system. Total budgeted net operating costs have also
been reduced from $46,922,650 to $43,902,850 by $3,019,800, the increase in the
amount of overhead expected to be allocated out to the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
and individual District Funds.
Based on results through December 31, staff believes that if flows remain
approximately two percent higher than budgeted and casts are at or below budget, the
gallonage charge should come in under the $490 budget, or more closely approximate
$485 at year end.
.. Section 1 - Page 1
1997-98 Mid-Year Review
Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of December 31, 1997:
• Salaries and Wages- Net Joint Operating Personnel Costs were at 49.61 percent of
budget through mid-year while staffing was 17 full time equivalents, or three percent V
below the total approved in the 1997-98 budget. Personnel costs increased in the
second quarter over the first by $493,000, or 8.5 percent as 8 full time equivalent
employees were added and excess annual vacation and sick leave balances were
paid off.
• Odor Control-At mid-year, Odor Control was at $1,019,000, or 69.9 percent of
budget at mid-year and represents a 66.7 percent increase over the prior year. In j
addition, these costs increased in the second quarter over the first by $327,000, or L
94.6 percent. The high usage of odor control is primarily due to seasonal trends
and the high number of complaints that required attention during this time period. L
Based upon historical trends, staff expects a reduction in usage during the winter
and spring seasons and we will closely monitor these costs through the reminder of
this fiscal year.
• Repairs and Maintenance- Mid-year expenses for"Materials and Services" and
"Contracts" related to Repairs and Maintenance totaled $2,065,000, or 56.7 percent L
of the combined budget of$3,641,000. These costs went up mostly within the
second quarter. Combined, they increased by$279,000, or by 31.3 percent over I ,
the first quarter. Equipment failures are somewhat unpredictable and were L
somewhat higher in the first half of the year than normal. However, staff expects
this account to approximate budget by year-end.
L
• Environmental Monitoring- Environmental Monitoring was only at $601,000, or 34.1
percent of budget at mid-year. This decrease of 39.2 percent from the prior year is
primarily due to the timing of payments made for ocean monitoring. This line item is y
expected to approximate budget at year-end.
• Power- Seasonal demand for electricity is the reason why Power is at $539,970, or
55.7 percent of budget. Power costs are incurred at a much higher rate during the
summer months than any other time of the year. Lj
• Natural Gas- Natural gas is purchased as a supplement to the methane gas that is
obtained from the digesters as a treatment process by-product and used to fuel the
central generation stations that provide the electricity to power the Districts'
u
Section 1 - Page 2
V
Overview
treatment facilities. Natural gas expenses are currently at $552,590, or 53.9 percent
•' of budget. This overage Is primarily due to the higher cost of purchasing natural gas
than was budgeted. However, staff has initiated a program to lower the operating
limits of generator engines in an effort to reduce natural gas consumption. With the
success of this program, the Natural Gas line item is expected to be within budget
by year-end.
.. Other Increases in the Second Quarter over the First- Other than previously
mentioned items, there were two other line items that had noteworthy increases in
the second quarter over the first. Chemical Coagulants and Research had
increases of$172,000 and $184,000. Although only currently at 42.9 percent of
budget, the second quarter increase of 84.0 percent in Chemical Coagulants is due
to the correction of invoices previously posted incorrectly. Similarly, Research is
currently only at 48.7 percent of budget. However, these costs increased 277.4
percent in the second quarter due to the timing of the contracted services received
and when they are actually paid.
v
re
r
u
r
r
Section 1 - Page 3
1997-98 Mid-Year Review -
Comparison of Mid-Year Results with Year-End Actuals (Budget)
Last Five Years —
550-
525 ,a
500]9 5P5)0
0 i
U 500-
Q A9 P
]416
E
e 475
a
"o
U
450
425
9}9 94-95 9S% %-97 97-%
2nd Year end Yea, h,d Year 2M Ymr 9,d M ml
OV er,d otr end or eM Otr eM otr BUdW
For comparative purposes, the budgeted and actual costs per million gallons for the
past five years have been reduced proportionately to reflect the increase in overhead
costs that would have been allocated out if the updated model we are now using had
been previously implemented. As highlighted in the graph shown above, the cost per
million gallons at mid-year compared to year-end has fluctuated over the last five years.
In 1993-94, 1995-96, and 1996-97, the cost per million gallons was one to five percent "
higher at mid-year than at year-end. Conversely, the cost per million gallons was also
one percent lower for 1994-95 and is projected to be approximately five percent for
1997-98.
Section 2 - Page 1 provides a graphical comparison of each Department's contribution
towards the gallonage charge through mid-year, as budgeted for 1997-98, and as
actually incurred through mid-year in 1996-97. All three charts are quite similar
showing little change between the prior year mid-year actual, current year budget, and
current mid-year actual.
For more detailed information, Section 2 - Page 2 and 3 provides for the divisional
contributions to the gallonage charge through mid-year for the last five years, Section 2
r
Section 1 - Page 4
Overview
Page 4 provides a summary of expenses by category through December 31, 1997
and 1996, Section 2 - Page 5 and 6 provides a summary of expenses by line item
through December 31, 1997 and 1996, Section 2 - Page 7 provides a summary of Joint
Operating Revenues by line item through December 31, 1997, and 1996; Section 2 -
Page 8 provides for a comparison of expenses by department for 1995-96, 1996-97,
and 1997-98 year-to-date, Section 2 — Page 9 and 10 provides for a comparison of
expenses incurred by quarter by line item for the first and second quarters of 1997-98,
and Section 2 - Page 11 provides staffing trends over the last five years including total
authorized, actual staffing positions filled, and vacant staffing positions.
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review:
160,000.00o
fso,oao,00a
uewo,000
$30 00o,000
S20,000,000
$10.1100,000
w
— 12131197 Actual Projected 1997-98 Budgeted 1997-98
Capital Outlay- Capital Outlay- CapitalOutlay-
$25,284,000 $48,486,000 S54,540,000
At December 31 1997, total Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) expenditures
totaled $25,284,000, as depicted by the chart above, or 46.4 percent of budget.
Section 3 — Page 1 provides a graphical presentation on the dollar amount of capital
expenditures incurred for each major type of capital improvement and a graphical
presentation on each Districts' share of the total amount of joint works capital outlay
requirements incurred through December 31.
Section 1 - Page 5
1997-98 Mid-Year Review L
L
For more detailed information, Section 3 - Page 2 through 5 provides a summary of the L
Joint Works construction requirements of each project for the current year and Section
3 — Page 6 through 11 provides a summary of the Joint Works construction
requirements of each project over the project life. L
Budget Review by Districts: At December 31, 1997, revenues of all Districts totaled
$56.0 million, or 42.0 percent of budget. Other(User) Fees, the largest revenue source L
of the individual Districts budgeted at $71.3 million, are only at 34.1 percent of budget,
or $24.3 million. The primary reason for this shortfall is due to the $5.2 million in sewer
user fees refunded to commercial users. These refunds, which in most cases go back
four years, were provided to commercial users who provided documentation that their
actual usage was less than what was calculated by the Districts' square footage
formulas. No Sale of Capacity Rights, budgeted at$1.6 million, have been received L
because these revenues are not due to the Districts until April of 1998.
Conversely, Connection Fees, budgeted at $5.9 million, are at 61.8 percent, or$3.6
L'
million due to higher than expected building activity within the member cities. Interest &
Miscellaneous Receipts are also high at 53.2 percent of budget, or $11.7 million L
because of both larger available cash balances and higher interest rate yields than was
anticipated in the 1997-98 budget.
L
Expenses and outlays of all Districts totaled $72.3 million, or 46.2 percent of budget at
December 31, 1997. District Operating and Other Expenditures, budgeted at $9.1 U
million, are only at 30.9 percent of budget, primarily because of the majority of the line
cleaning work to be done is scheduled for the second half of the fiscal year. District
Trunk Sewer Construction costs, budgeted at $11.5 million, are only at 18.2 percent of L
budget, or 2.1 million, due to the prioritization of joint treatment works construction
projects over individual District construction projects. Conversely, COP/Bond
Retirement and Interest Expense, budgeted at $34.3 million, are high at 60.5 percent of L
budget, or$20.7 million because the majority of the principal debt service payments are
made at the beginning of the fiscal year.
L
Self-Insurance Funds Budget Reviews: The Districts are self-insured for Workers'
Compensation, and for General Liability claims in excess of$25 million. Separate fund L
accounting is utilized for the recording of revenue and expenses incurred In managing
these liability claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual District
contributions based on each District's share of Joint Works Operating Costs (sewage u
flows). Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and
excess loss policies. L
L
Section 1 - Page 6
L
Overview
.. The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $388,000, or 74.1 percent of budget at
December 31, while total expenses were also high at $594,000, or 74.8 percent of
budget due to higher than expected claim losses due to the Newport Bay spill.
.. Operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report (Section 6)
pertains to the status of Performance Objectives as of December 31, 1997.
Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the Districts and
incorporated into the 1997-98 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance
measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured,
achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to
further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the Districts'
critical goals for 1997-98, workplans were also developed at the Divisional level.
At December 31, 1997, 69 percent of the Districts performance objectives and 59
percent of the workplan milestones were on target for completion by year-end.
.. Section 1 - Page 7
1997-98 Mid-Year Review
u
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
V
L
L
L'
J
Section 1 - Page B
L
SECTION 2.
JOINT OPERATING & WORKING CAPITAL BUDGET REVIEW
J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
Departmental Gallonage Charges
For the Six Months Ended December 31. 1997
08M
Engineering 62%
0%
GSA
S% 11
Finance
_ 6%
Comm
1%
Info Tetlr
_ a%
Exec M9mt
2% Tisch Svcs WR
14% 3%
Departmental Gallonage Charges
199]-96 Budget
Engineering
1% )59%
dM
_ G 5 A
e%
Finance
7%
Comm
t%
Into Tech
a%
Exec Mgmt
2% HIR
Tech Svcs 3-A
16%
Deparenental Gallonage Charges
For The Six Months Ended December 31,1996
Engineering 0 6 M
% 5]%
GSA
9%
Finance
)%
Comm
1%
Info Tech
3%
Exec. Mqmt H/R
3% tech Sv. 4%
15%
Section 2 - Page 1
1997-98 Mid Year Report
Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge I
For The Six Months Ended December 31 L
IM-98
1993 1994 1995 IBM ReWeed 1997
Actual Actual Actual Actual Annual Budget Actual u
Flow In Million Gallons 41,042.M $3.927.97 43.254.61 44,631.77 89,415.D0 &S.S73.73
General Manager 6.28 11.69 10,17 15.T7 1D.43 11.14
Boed Secrelary 0.79 oS7 1.21 1.29 - -
MaragarreMSupport 2.70 270 ew - - -
Total Management 9.77 %96 12.34 17.08 10.43 11.14 (�
Communleations 4.30 &44 6.22 5.47
HR Administration am 1D.13 - - - -
HumanResources - - 4.12 6.25 4,73 0.79 L
Safety&Emegeer Response - - 5.00 6.98 5.96 &91
Education&Training - - 3.92 7.33 541 7.18
Total Human Resources 8.06 10.13 13.84 20.54 16.10 1&99
Fianm Adtnlnisualion 14.28 15.01 19.34 17.91 17.96 IS."
Accounting 7.19 8.80 10.42 10.80 10.16 10.74
Purchasing B Warehousing 6.02 591 7.25 7.03 6.92 5.79
Total Finance 27.49 29.72 37AI 36.74 35.04 3298
General Services AdMinastralion 12.98 1245 7.28 7.56 3S5 4.63
Collection Facilitim Monte.. 2.71 231 5.00 6.27 285 1.96
Pent FaGlBles Maintenance 37.65 34.68 33.43 37.26 37.87 36.56 Lai
Total General SeMces Admin 63.34 49.44 45.71 SLOB 4 67 4316
End User Support - - 6.40 5.23 6.30 7.53
Pr g,Detabme&NeMorlang - - 182.3 9.35 T96 6.79 L
Plant Autcourt. - 4.48 4.78 3.21
Total Information Technology - - 24.63 19.06 19.06 17.63
Olxe&Mantonance Adnin 9.15 &40 1331 14.05 228 2.38 u
Open&Meinlentuxe Scheduling - 4.54 4.49 -
O&M Process Support - - - - 7.80 7.65
Plant No.1 Operations - - 67.95 75.46 74.67 75.31 is l
Piam No.2 Operations - - 105.93 105.81 %.19 10&03
Mechaical Maintenance OB19 55.90 46.61 45.6E 49.97 48.60
Seca.&Instr MWnteenco - - - 43.44 49.54 62.15 L
Electiml Maintenance M,07 18.08 16.39 - -Instrumentation Maintenance 24.84 27.17 23.00 -Central Generation - - 2045 22.06 29.24 22.23
Air Quality&SpcL Projerls - - - - 240 7A7 Id
Plant Operations 173.15 149.80 - -
TOtWOIxvwtl.&Mamie . 28M 26L35 2" 310.99 3XGD 3M36
Continued u
L
IL
Y
Section 2-Page 2 I
L.I
J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
r. Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge
For The Six Months Ended December 31
1997-98
r 1993 ism 1995 1996 Revised 1997
Actual AC .l Actual ACWal Annual Budget Actual
Cordinued:
r Tedmiwl Servims Adminismon 2,72 1.97 6.19 8.69 7.47 8.21
Compliance 38.73 40.68 - - -
Cons.Red,Reuse 63.99 62.42
r Air Quality 5.57 7.18 - - - -
Enviianmerdal Mgmt - - 54.91 39.46 41A.5 29.07
Enron idal Stlen e I aoonne, 4110 35.47 32.74 30.14 32.74 30.90
Sound Contol 8.64 10.64 584 5.05 3.83 3.95
Total Tech 5enrlm 161.74 158.36 99.68 83.34 asm 72.13
Engineering Adminadraton 0.23 o32 3.68 1.10 - -
Planning aDes9n 0.10 1.59 7.78 1.15 D.93 0.93
s Engineering Pt m ng - - 157 0,40
- -
IniammeirtalionBCorrtmis - - - - - -
ConaWCEanManegement 3.49 2.11 3.57 3.43 0.46 0.76
Total Engineering 3.82 4.02 16.60 6.08 1.36 1.69
Total Expenses 551.62 626.98 551.62 548.33 638.48 620.33
Leas Revenues (42.83) (szw) (45.82) (37.55) (47.53) (51.69)
Nat JO Expenses 508.79 474.38 505.70 510.78 490.95 468.64
sr
se Section 2-Page 3
1997-98 Mid Year Report L
Summary of Expenses by Major Category y
For The Six Months Ended December 31, 1997
g ised
eeeleed Eq. Eq. Incr. Imr. Parton
Budget TAry Taru (Derr.) (Dear.) Budge) Bem Wn9
1987411 llwiw 1L31R6 6 % 1e11 ed Budget
I
Nel Salaries,Wages8aere91s 24,354.900 12.082,655 12,971.529 (866.871) 4.55% 4961% 12,M.w
Olr Eg 401,090 187.117 149,114 39,003 25.4996 48.65% 213,IXG I 1
V
Odor Camel&cl mw Goa9ularib 4,579.910 2404.57D 2.182,464 322.106 14.90% 5425% 2.M,3W
CoMr .l Se m 6,250.720 2.717,724 2.910.478 (192754) 4.82% N42% 3,SW.W6
L
profine lServices 1.496.980 897,891 918.514 (220,623) -24.02% 48.62% 799,099
Ee.pp Charges 21a,5x0 0.529 137,277 (9,748) 49.15% U, 134,891
L
Repair a MaiM.,Materials d Semms a641,070 2.064,5W 1,41O.W7 563.5W 394l% %,70% 1,57%%4
Pevearclta Mon4ding 2.453.000 076201 1,317,486 (339.285) -25.75% 2*88% 1,474,799 L
Train, 615.580 441.707 271.307 170,320 6276% 54.1ft 373.853
Ukift a 3,162,I)W 1,W483 1,557.331 111,152 7.14% 52.75% 1,494.467 L
O111ar Meteriele,Supplies
b ONeide Se . 770.180 3(x;'M Wsw (2aa, 5 ) 46.54% J9.a5% 463,274 L
Tote)Jam)Op"N Expnees OB,152,850 23,713,4W 24,472.824 (759.355) JA^ 49.25% 24.439.381
Resenuesa OBsel1 (4250,000) (2,355,870) (1,678A27) (679.BW) 40.55% 55.43% (1,884,330) L
NatJ M Operating Egwree 0.t,9@,B50 21,357,799 22,796787 (1,436.996) 41.31% 48.85% 22,545,051
Gellormgenwe(MG) 89.425.00 45.M,73 44.631 T1 942 2.11% 50.96% 43,851y
V
QUanagen (MGO) 245.02 247.68 242.% 5.12 2,11%
Gellw�Ctur9e(VWG) 413e% 46 &l 510.7a (42.13) 425% L
L
L
L
V
L
Section 2-Page 4
L
J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Expenses by Line Item
r For The Six Months Ended December 31,1997
% REVISED
REVISED EJ(P EXP ExP INCR INCR
`4 BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECK) (DECR)
Description 1997-98 IWIM 1201I97 BUDGET 1MIM 9 %
Salaries.Wages 6 Benefits
salaries Wages 30,822,400 15,582,3pB 50.58 15,240,092 16,24],]85 (865,457) (4.10)
Enplo Banafits:
Retiremart 2.806.970 1,061,133 37.80 1.745.837 1,368,022 (326,889) (23.55)
sy Workers Comp 214,360 107.180 50.00 107,180 102,400 4,780 4.67
Unemployment 1. 64,900 18,962 29.22 45,93E 31,605 (12,603) (40.110)
Gmupinsumnce 3,010.650 1,305,630 43.37 1,705,020 1,487,061 (181.431) (1220)
r Uniform Rental 69,580 26934 41.58 40,646 32,]96 (3,862) (/1.76)
Total Benefits 6,166,460 2,521,839 40.90 3,644,621 3,041,880 (5m.w) (ITID)
58184es,Wages 8 Benefits 361988,860 18,104.147 48.94 18,664,713 19.289,649 (1,155,502) (6.15)
r. Salaries B Ben.Alec.
Almxcm ON to-Cor6Die1 (12,633,960) (6,021,292) 47.66 (6,612,668) (6,318,123) 296,831 (4,70)
Nat J.O.Payroll 24,354,900 12,082.855 49.61 122]2,045 12,971,526 (888,671) (6.W)
Mao,Supply.S samcea
s� Gasoline,Diesel B Oil 193,460 92,196 47e5 101.284 100,353 (6,1s7) (8.13)
Inw.m 1.335,000 628.217 47.06 706.783 659,320 (31,111) (4,M)
MembersHm 84,480 54746 64.80 29.734 54,660 (114) (0.21)
Office EV-Supplies 123.370 76.006 61.61 47.364 66,727 9,279 13.91
r Ofiloe AAonebon 131,830 59AW 45.13 72.336 25,134 34,360 1W.71
Cher 119.160 42,757 35.88 76.403 44,029 (1,2M) (289)
Mirror FumlWre,Fortuna,a 26,720 8,860 33.16 17.860 13,224 (4,364) (33.00)
Operating Supplies
Odor Centel 1,458,400 1,019,349 69.90 439.051 611.449 407,900 66.71
SuNNe Comml 1.419,600 704.692 49.54 714,908 635,134 69.555 10.95
C6emioal Coagulents 1,354.260 581,DB3 42.91 n3,177 823.030 (241,947) (29,40)
Lab C6emiCals B SuPpfias 347,650 179.446 Sleet! 1682G4 92.851 85.585 9326
Toot 93.700 40,562 43.29 53,138 41.246 (684) (1.66)
SoN,Paints,&Jan.supplies 113,660 31,298 2T!l4 82.352 51.123 (19,8n) (36.78)
Osier Coasting Supplies 201.800 102,319 50.70 99.481 101.497 822 0.81
contraelual sank es
r GmurxIsleeping B Janitorial 1so" 49.303 32.87 tooter 36,168 13,135 W.32
Outside Lab Semm 116.100 38.334 M.02 77,766 23626 14.708 6225
ScIA.Removal 3,964,500 1,938.514 48.90 2.W5,9B6 2204,178 (265,664) (1205)
Oder Want Disposal 388,500 211,306 54.39 1n,1B2 21,961 1811,347 88220
m Oxygen Pima ow 400,000 130,500 32.63 269,500 241,860 (111,364) (46.04)
Giber 1239620 349.765 25.22 Bill 3a2,681 (32,916) (B.W)
u
Section 2- Page 5
1997-98 Mid Year Report L
Summary of Expenses by Line Item L
For The Six Months Ended December 31,1997
% REVISED
REVISED E(P w EXP INCR INCR
BUDGET TNRU TNRU REMAINING TNRU (DECK) (DECR)
DESCRIPnUN 199748 1=1197 12/01/97 BUDGET 1=1196 6 %
professional Services
Legal 450,000 203,224 45A6 246,776 5511,407 (352,183) (63.41) L
Audit&A nting 66,0DD 41,600 63.03 24,400 39,055 2,545 6.52
Engineering 340,480 156,512 46.00 183,868 19,690 136,922 69&39
are, 840,500 296,455 46.28 WOO 304.362 (1,907) (2.63)
Printing&Publlw8on `j
Rephp4n44ouae 222,800 86,123 WAS 136,677 126.614 (40,491) (31.98)
Printing�0ubide 73,230 72,811 99.36 469 29,406 43,405 147.61
Kato Fripmeag 25,900 10.10 39.24 15,7W 15,566 (5.403) (34.71)
No9cas&Ads 24,600 13,576 55.20 11,022 10215 3,363 32.92 Ys
Rene&teases
Oulaide Equip Rental 93.870 56267 62.07 35.603 %,318 1,949 3.46
District Equip Rental 124,650 25,262 2027 99,368 80.91 (55,697) (68.80) Ild.
Repairs&Malydenence
Malenals&Bern= 2,543.880 1.706.667 67.09 B31213 1,113,314 59 ,M3 M 30
Contacts 1.D97,190 357,839 32.61 739.351 367,993 (9,754) (2.65) ll
Research&Monitoring 1.0
Emim Mondchg 1,763,000 601.348 34,11 1,161,652 988,896 (367,548) (39.19)
Air OualMMonitoring Q.= 4.388 10.97 35,612 - 4,388 WA I
Research 650.000 316.725 48.73 333.275 328,590 (11,865) (3.61)
Travel,Meetings&Training L
Meetings IN.950 127,983 65.65 05,967 94,995 32,988 M."
Training W0,610 313,724 50.55 306.865 176,392 137,332 T7.86
UtllMas
Diesel For Generalars 34.00 - - 34,620 310 (310) (100.0))
Poser 970.000 539.970 55.67 430.030 509.384 W.ii86 6.00
NaWr4l Gas 1.198,600 645,908 53.89 552,592 611.753 34,155 5.58 I I
Telephone 169.250 92.089 54.41 77,161 61.910 30.179 48.75 u
Water 790,580 390.516 49.40 40D,U64 373.974 16,542 4.42
Other Expanses
Freight 41,400 34.655 83.71 6,742 19,482 15.176 77.90 L
Gererel&safety 263,940 92.173 34.92 171.767 114,551 (22,378) (19,54)
AOMD Owninng Fees 142,OD0 55,740 39.25 86260 64,539 (8,799) (13.63)
Other Nondper Expe vw 60,990 12,415 20.35 48,575 22,330 (81915) (44)
Total Maids,Supp,&Sent. 25.903.800 12.594.987 45.62 13,309,813 12,316,068 278,919 2.26
Alluc.Out To CORFIDISL (2,1W.MO) (964,3M) 45.T7 (1,142,477) (814,77D) (149,6D3) 18.36
Net 10.48atis,Supp,&Sm. 23,797,951) 11,630614 48.87 12,167,336 11,501.2B8 129,316 1.12
Total J.O.Requbarents 48.152.550 23.T13.469 49.25 24,438,381 24,472.824 (759.355) (3.10)
leaf:: Revenue (4.250,000) (2.355,670) 5543 (1,M.M) (1,712.429) (843241) 37.56 y
Cost Allocation
-CORF,Di515,&Other - - - - 36,402 (38,42) (to0.00)
NM Revenue (4,250.000) (I.355,BR8 55.43 n.894.330) f,A76.o27) (B79.sa7 40.55
Net J.O.Expand up 43,902.850 21.361,791) 48.65 22.645.051 22,796.797 (1,438,998) (6,31)
L
L'
Sedion 2-Page 6
II
L
J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line Item
For the Sic Months Ended December 31, 1997
%
ADJUSTED REV REV REV INCR WCR
r BUDGET TNRU TNRU REMAINING TNRU (DECK) (DECR)
DESCRIpnON 1997-98 12131M 12I31187 BUDGET 1N31196 9 %
Irder Diet Sewer Use 1,840,00D 1,209,541 S574 630,459 536505 671.038 124.61
'^ WastaS w 400,000 178.955 ".74 221,045 168,466 10,499 6.23
Sludge Dapasal SSD,C00 524,025 61.65 325,975 399,1B7 124,838 3127
Wasteseuler peusl5ee - - - -Scrap Sam 20.000 - - 20,000 236 (236) (100.W)
Otter sales 3.Om 31® 10627 (180) 560 zees MILL
Broad da Rouse - - - - -
RedaBLmes 75,000 76.451 1D1.93 (1,451) fi8,253 10,196 1539
Gereel Nan Opera" 60,000 - - 60.00) 19,900 (19,9D0) (10D.00)
`y VeNd 0.86 2 eB Egi~ 250,000 24,657 25.343 124.398 (90,741) (80.18)
Mailing Fee - - - 22D (220) (10D.00)
SaVtng CNeges 2B2000 115,645 41.01 165,355 125,250 (9.615) (7.69)
r poser Sal® 470.000 223-IM 47.49 246.7m 233.042 (9.83 ) (4.22)
TOTAL JO REVENUES 4,250,000 2.355.670 66.43% 1,894,330 1,876,027 6/9,643 40.55
.. Section 2-Page 7
1997-98 Mid Year Report L
Comparisons of Expenses by Department
For The Prior Two Years Ended June 30, 1996 and 1997,As Budgeted For The
Year Ended June 30, 1998,And For The Six Months Ended December 31, 1997
199745
199696 199F97 R nnW Yxrw Dao Bud9M% 1
pm" entand MWo n Actual Actual B.d,M 17131M7 R Hrw U
Gemnl Mene9an OOptNnent
EPeO,Sw Mare9emml 793,1W 1.W7,513 932.3W 507,746 61.M%
BaeN Swemry 101,5e5 1M.M - - - I ,
Mena9nnern Supp 25.W 0 - - u
Taol fiM,3M 1.150292 932.3W Wrm 5/.M%
GOmmunlaxtlOna 426,0106 457,662 W5.aW X9.492 M.W%
Human Reaaurcea Daparenxnt
Human R.Adm,.baeon W500 T72,136 022.140 216.214 51.W% L
Fdxalbn S T. ir' 483.105 8931332 m2W 327,1N 81.38%
Selety a Emm9mcy R®pame 805,0133 451.01 M3.970 170,2D1 38.02%
tool 1.412.417 1.716.90 M W 1 1, 9,950 M. WE% '
FLunp Mparerwnt y
Fv,maa Adm'vtlmeSPn 11736.493 IASI l2 1,11S6W 749,5M 46.68%
A®urmnp S12,3n 910,835 90.870 489,519 M3m
Fvtlmip a werelwusin9 6B7,741 631,818 61e.ew 2W.W2 e2.80% , 1!
Tool 3,116,00 3223.973 3J33,810 1,5W,085 x7.97% u
Gxnen15ary Adminobauon
Gen m ServlmeA 'nbepon 170,067 535.316 353.830 210.792 W.e1%
Ccll m.Fmtitl®Swmemmoe 281,932 129,m 251.570 Win W01%
Rad F.d Mtintmena 3,01,305 3.599180 3.388.120 1OW= 4920% EMI
Tool 3.4113.003 420c.405 3.904,620 1,a55,a55 492
Id nnxBon Tx nale9y
6tlU suppml 611,03 458.999 502,960 313,268 W.W%
Ras.Oeaxre a Nee.." 975.824 Wea09 713.430 3W.556 M.W
Rem Aul xwn 278,806 M7,16d 1M.32B 3a26%
Tool 1,5573 7 1.394,615 1.703,!50 7W,173 46.91% I
operNOro a Malnbnanoe O "t"eM I
Oa MAdntll.m 392.229 1.385.553 2W,9W 1W,= 53.0094, Yd
oa MStlWW' 435,456 nl., - - -
oaMPlmuSuppon Win 3M.057 Woe% 1 ;
PIMe W.l0paxtxrs - elm,o35 eAn.31a 3.4M.357 51.M%
FUvd W.2opvx5ora - 9.374.709 8.870,NO 4,766,539 53.96%
Med�pJ®IMmewance 4,3H.9W 120,690 I.468.0W 2.214,792 49.58%
Demral Mvvnmar,m 1.716.531 1.787.518 - - - I
Ieahumenaeon MArnsne,m 2270.0c8 2,161=
Damanahxe xnm59n Mba. - - x.x29.870 2.378,SW 5].65% iilil
Air OiaMyBSp®IPr"j - - 661,740 319.648 48.3
Cenbal Ger,vaM 1,675,021 2.e14.880 1,013,00 38.74%
Oparatlom OxM xO
TOoI 9200.1N n.W3.5W 28.W4,O O 11,OW.170 51.01%
xd
13Oem0are MmhdWeEpn 1202.112 - - -
PIm5O9Mebo,a 18.531AU - -
ToMI 19.733246 1
Tsa lexl8xnlm NPxronxnl �1
ra0evalSm.Admmimab, W3.301 49020 667A10 374.060 68.02%
FirvbmmMeel Mana9emem 3.580.148 3.4.54,304 3.7o6.780 1.324,922 35.74% I I
Fsvbmmaexl5der®lxb 2.09.M 2.352.M 2.9M,140 1,40,154 4889% V
SMxm CwNd 175.512 3W,Wt 352M0 Isom am
Taal 7268.708 7.175.121 7,615.140 3297229 43.00%
En9lrw n90eWronmt f
Fay.,AdmuvxoeWn W.534 GOO - 74 - L
Oedp En9imedns 182.78a W,101 _ -
Enly-W Ramo9 118.096 15.367 -
PlwvgaDe p - - 0,3W M.358 50.84% I
Corxnrman Marapemvd 134.51e M.SM 40.370 34.588 W. V
Tool 40.930 1M,a a 123.690 n.018 Q2
lm blM Opantln9 Rae.. (4.190.013e) (3.3e1,448) (42W.OWl (2.355.670) 55.M%
IMbIMOperr!M,Fipanxa 43.4W.W1 M.029.9W 0.902.850 21,357.799 e6.65% f 11
y
Section 2- Page 8
I
L
J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
Comparison of Expenses Incurred by Quarter by Line Item
For the Quarters Ended September 30 and December 31, 1997
Exp Incr In
r From Expense
Esp. Exp. 9130117 Inowred Inc
Thm Tleu Thru In and on, (Decr)
Description 12/31197 a/90197 12/31/97 Over let Ob %
satsdes.Most a Bene/1b
v.
Selades 3 Wages 15,582,308 7,567,725 8.014,583 448,a58 6.90
Fanphryae Brnflm:
Reoemem 1,061,133 506,131 555.002 48,971 9.66
Wakens Camp 107,180 63,5M 53,590 0.00
rd unemployment Ins 18.962 - 18.982 18.952 -
Group lnsurw¢e 1,305,630 659.025 646,SD5 (12.420) (1.88)
uknwm Rental 25,934 14,720 14,214 (506) (3.44)
v. Tots Benefits 2,521,839 1,233,466 1,288,373 54,907 4.45
Sslartss,Wages B Benefits 18,104,147 8,801,191 9,302,9W 501,765 5.70
r
Salaries 9 Ben.AM=
Direct/Indirect Alkx>CorMst (6,021,292) (3,M5,045) (3,015,247) (9,202) 0.31
Not J.O.Payroll 12,082,855 6,795,146 6,267.709 492.553 8.50
Mod,Supply,a SwAcas
v. Gasoline,Used 80il 92,196 26,995 65,201 38.206 141.53
Insurance 625.217 307,423 320,794 13,371 4.35
Memberships 54,746 64,990 (10.244) (75,234) (115.78)
r Office Fes-Supplies 76,006 28262 47,744 19.452 68.93
Office Automation 99,494 18.439 41,055 22,616 122.65
OdW 42.757 20,329 13,428 (15,901) (54.22)
m Miter Furnilum,Rxbses,etc. 8,860 3,5W 5,3M 1,800 50.99
Operating supplies
er Door Control 1,019,349 345,982 673.367 327,385 94.62
Sulfide Codrul 704.692 358,552 346.130 (12.432) (3.47)
Chemical CosgWemc 581,083 204,600 376,483 171,ae3 84.01
Lab Chemicals 8 Supplies 179,446 68,909 110,538 41,630 60.41
Tools 40,582 16,241 24,321 8,080 49.75
Solv,Pause,8 Jan.Supplies 31298 15,9% 15,312 (674) (422)
rr Offer Operarn supplies 102,319 45,122 57.197 12,075 26.76
Cagraehwl SeMcas
Gmundskeeping B Jaataial 49,303 28,6W 22,667 (3.969) (14.90)
^" Outside Lab Services 38,334 17.694 20,840 Z946 16.65
_ solids Removal 1,938,514 967,974 9M,540 2.5% 0.27
Over Wavle Disposal 211,308 $3,849 127,459 43,610 52.01
Oxygen Plant Opw 130,500 84.500 46.000 (38,500) (416M)
Omer 349,765 134,760 215.005 80245 59.55
r
Section 2-Page 9
r
1997-98 Mid Year Report L
Summary of Expenses by Line Item
For The Six Months Ended December 31, 1997 L
Exp. Incr In
From Expense `j
Ems. Exp. 9/30/97 Incurred Iner
Thru ThN ThN In 2nd Otr (Door) I I
DESCRIPTION 12/31/97 9130/ 79 12/31197 Over tat CIOL
tr %
Professional Services
Legal 203,224 134.130 69.094 (65.036) (48A9)
Auea&Aecourong 41.600 26,070 15.530 (10,540) (40.43)
Engineering 156,612 57,428 69.184 (18.244) (20.87)
Other 296,455 154,767 141,688 (13.079) (8.45)
Printing&Publlcabon L
Repro-In-House 86,123 50,156 35.967 (14,189) (28.29)
Printing-Outside 72.811 21,185 51,626 30.441 143.69
Photo Processing 10,163 3.164 6,999 3,83E 12121 I '
Notices&Ads 13,578 7,171 6,407 (781) (10.65) L
Rents&Leases
Outside Equip Rental 58,257 22,772 35,495 12.723 65.87
District Equip Rental 25,262 12,931 12,331 (600) (4.64)
Repairs&Maintenance
Materials&Services 1,705,667 643,873 1.062,794 418,921 65.06 )
Contracts 357.839 248,716 109,123 (139,593) (56.13) W
Researdn&Monitoring
Enviro Monitoring 601,348 T75,357 325,991 50.634 18.39
Air Duality Monti 4.388 33.291 (251 (62,194) (186.52)
Research 316,725 66,343 250,352 184,039 277.41
Travel,Meetings&Training
Meetings 127.953 45,220 82,763 37,543 93.02 V
Training 313,724 131,128 182,596 51.468 39.25
Utilities
Diesel For Generators - - - -
Po,var 539,970 281,943 258,027 (23,916) (8,48) V
Natural Gas 645,908 275,223 370,685 95,462 34.69
Telephone 92,089 34,001 58.088 24,087 70.84
Water 390,516 216,544 173,972 (42,572) (19.66)
Other Expenses
Freight 34,655 17,019 17.639 620 3.61
General&Safety 92,173 58.546 33.627 (24,919) (42.56) L
AOMD Operating Fees 55.740 55,740 55.740 -
Other Non-Oper Expense 12,41E 12,415 12,41E
Net J.O.-Matls,Supp,&Serv. 12,594.987 5.696,780 6,898,227 1,201,467 21.09 I '.
Cost AllocCorf&Other (964,373) (463.361) (500,992) (37.611) 8.12 I.rl
Net J.O.-Matls,Supp.&Serv. 11.630.614 5.233,379 6,397,235 1,163,856 2224
Total J.O. Requirements 23,713.469 11,028,525 IZSS4,944 1,656,419 15.02
Less. Revenue (2,355,670) (1,464,240) (891,430) 572,810 (39.12) Yi
Cost Allocation
—CORF,Dists.&Other - - - - -
Not Revenue (2,355,670) (1,464,240) (891,430) 572,810 (39.12) u
Net J.O.Expenditures 21,357.799 9.564,285 11.793,514 2.229.229 23.31
iJ
Section 2-Page 10
L
J. O. & W. C. Budget Review
Staffing Trends
Full Time Equivalents
December 31, 1997
roa
664 666 673
4 60
70
fiW .
560 560
1 696 e1� 25 17 1
l
soo
69(MM 6/30/95 6g0.96 Crl697 IM M
oAae.i ovaw+
At December 31, 1997, the total head count was 553 employees, or a full time equivalency of
542.75.
Section 2- Page 11
1997-98 Mid Year Report
U
J
L
�J
L
u
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
U
u
U
G
U
u
i ,
u
Section 2-Page 12 f
u
YI
` SECTION 3.
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND REVIEW
CORF Review
Capital Improvement Program — FY 1997-98
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997
Equipment lame
9695.63C
a%
Plant 1
$7.931,420
31%
Pant 2
$6,333,095
yp 26%
II- }
n 1
Interplant and Joint Spacial Projects
FacilNiec $3.493,446
56.659,937 16%
26%
Total Capital Improvement Expenditures - $25,283,532
DI.W.No.13
sn6,690
1%
Oie
97trict No.2
Mania No.3 .365,093
f7,7t1,4 2yy
30%
Datrict No.5
D1.01"No.1 Datrid No.a
$2,6N.65B $1.016.398
10% a%
Dl.Vid$1.71 ,6911 D$1rict.238,8No.1a $2.323,557
$1,711,695 $t,2]6,691 8%
_ i% 6%
Total Capital Improvement Funding — $25,283,532
Section 3- Page 1
1997-98 Mid Year Report L
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements-Current Year L
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997
1997-98 1997-98 1987.98
1997.98 Actual Remaining Projected L
Eadmeted Outlet' @ 12MIM7 Goods Outlay
A.Reclammlon Rem 1 New oral Cited,Projects:
1.Headworke
b.M&D Structure Concrete Rap.,Pt-56 50.000 97 49,903 100
2.Primary Treatment
a.Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,P1.37 - 594 15941 20,600
b.Prim OmIlem 3,4&5 Rehab. P1-41 500.000 434,195 65,805 1,128,70D ad
3.Secondary Treatment
a.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,P1.36-2 11.900,000 5,557.185 6,342,815 11,400.000
Transfer to Line H Below I5001000) - (5001000) -
d.Drain Modifications m Activated Sludge Plant.Pt-59 75,000 1,384 73,616 21,400 W
S. Electrical Power Systems
a.Elecd.Facility Mod l&Safety Upgrade$,P1-4 -1 375,000 19,035 355,965 39,000
Transfer to C.7,d 1350,M) - (350,000) L'I
b.12KV Distribution System giW for Support Facilities.P147 2,200,000 53.693 2,146,307 5
c.66KV Substation Addition,Pt-52 1;300,000 39,144) 1,260,880 44,100
6.Safety Improvements
a.Fire Protection.Signs and Water Sys Mods.,Pt-39-5 676,000 669,803 306.197 878,000
b.Selmic Retrofit of NomStrumure Systems,P143 400,000 182,509 217.491 284,700 6i
c.Seismic Retrofit Structual items,Pt-441,2,3,4 1.500.000 146,517 1,353,483 216,500
7.Miscellaneous Projects
a.Fac Mail&Safety Upgol P1-40-2 800.000 638,994 161,OW 600,000 I
b.Drainage Improv.At Rant 1,P140.3 - 2,624 (2.624) 104,600 ied
c.Chemical Facility Margin,P146-2 - 4,692 (4.692) 18,OW
d.Admin.Bldg.Lobby Acoustical Impc,Pt-54 - 3,751 (3,7511 8,800 i
a.Allowance for Planned Small Projects 700.000 230,702 469,298 430,700
S Tmel -Redametlon Rem 1 19.826,000 7,884,915 11,941,085 15,447,900 W
8.Ram 2 New and Ongoing Major Projects:
1. Headwork;
a. Rent 2 influent Dwane n,P2.86 150,000 t 1,aa9 138,551 31,400 L
It.Replacement of Bim s een Influent Gate, P2.63 170,000 5.032 164.968 S,000
2.Primary Treatment
b.Pdmery Clarifier RabaE. P2.49 2,500,000 1,159,619 1.340.381 2,782,000
Transfer to Projects Below (53.360) - 153,360) - V
L&M Prim Sad Verifiers Pump Room Eaulp Upgrade 20.810 1,479 19,331 1,500
N&0 Print Sad Clarifiers Pump Room Equip Un ade 32.550 - 32,550
d.Drain RePlacement at Primary Besins A,B,C,P2-67 30,000 962 29.048 1,000
4.Solids Proceuing W
e. Rehab 7 Digesters,P2-39 3501000 10,721 339,279 40,700
b.TWAS Feed to Digestive F&G.P2-39-1 180,OW 0.752 171,248 163,80)
d.Scale Rapleeemant at Dawatedng Facility,P2-82 15,OW - 15.000 -
5.Electrical Power Systems L
b. Usual Fac Modifna&Safety Upgrades.P2-47-1 200.000 59,261 140.739 109,300
6.Safety Improvements
a.Fee Protection,Signs&Water Sys Madifus,P2-ee 784,000 592,058 191,942 708,600 L
Transfer to Project Below 15,2301 - 15,2301 -
Reclaimed Water Extension to Hwks'C',P246-2 5.230 10.986 (5,7561 151,0110
b.Landsc.&Img.At City Water Pump St.,P246-1 25.000 6.944 18,056 28,900
c.Fac Modifns&Safety Up9radea,P247-2 SW,OW 495.648 304.352 800,DD0 j
d.Seimla Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems, P2-50 780,000 233,473 546,527 1,081,Sof Le
e.Seismic Retrofit,Structural items P2-53-2 3W.GW 556,625 (256.625) 721,OD0
f.Chemical and Plant Water Medlin.P2-55 847,000 710.683 136,317 B47,OD0
g.Reclaimed Water System Pint. 2 20,000 - 20,000 - L
7.Miscellaneous Projects
c. Conveyor Belt Aced at Solids Storage 7S.SW - 75.500 -
L
Section 3-Page 2
I �
L
CORF Review
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Current Year
For the Six Months Ended December 30, 1997
1997-98 199798 1997-98
1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected
r Eadmeted Outlay 012/31f97 Outlay 0",
B.Plant 2 New anal Ongohm Major ProjernlCom.l:
d.Allowance for Planned Smell Projects 700.000 409.589 290,411 609,600
B.Sepaort Facilbies erM Site on,nna more
a.Weraboum Building,P246 568.000 22,811 545,109 72,600
b.Maintenance Building.P2-35-3&.1 1,832.000 1.837,516 (51516) 2,032,000
C.Phaw ll Site&Security Imp.,P2-35-5 600.000 1491541 450.459 635,600
d.Operations Building,P2.23.5.1(Rabid No. 21 10.000 8,157 1,843 6.200
r Sub-Total -Ts.ment Plant 2 10.936,500 6.291.290 4,645,204 10.989,200
C.Ynerplent erel Jolla FaclBtba
r 1.Support Facilities and She haprovaments
d.CNG Refueling Station,Pt-51 200,000 721.328 1521,3281 1,208,400
2.Our l&sooner Pump Stations
a.Surge Tow.Replacement,J-34-1 4,350,000 4.371,858 121,8581 7,151,M
r 3.Information Management Systems
a.Computerized Fec.Records and Dag.Sys.J-25-1 205.000 24,067 180.933 124.W0
4.Plants 1&2 Monhor/Conwl Sys
b.OOBS's Control System,J-31.2 5.000 4,492 508 4.500
r a. Plant 1 Headworka Symms,J-313 739.000 35,982 703,018 636000
d. Secondary Control System Upgrade,Pant 2,131.4 600,000 83,895 516.105 83,900
e.Plant Remyemionfqutomatim Project,142 2,800,000 102,359 2,697,631 534,4(10
Transfer to Project Below, (36.1261 - 136,126)
r 'C'H.M Baracman&Mal Alums 36.126 10.994 25.132 11.000
f. Solely Storage Rehab and Automation.Jib 650.000 43,732 606.268 229,700
5.Electdoel Pow.Systems
_ e.Gas Mizmg Systems Impravrrments,J-25-3-1 I W.000 516 99.484 5W
b.Elect].Power Systems Rehab. Studies J-25-2.3.4 1.20GM 176.318 1,023,682 359,000
c. Standby Power Reliability Moddns.J-33.1 300,000 67,274 212,726 237,300
d.MSP No. 3.Headworka 2.J 33 100.000 644,265 (444,265) 675,300
Harmonic Fhere Automation,JAB SO.000 - 60,000 I.Power&Distribution Sidle Wmtletion,J-50 140.000 92 139,908 100
It.Improwments to Central Generation 100.000 1001000 Transfer to Projects Below 434.087) (34,087)
r Entronics Hardware&Software Upgrade(Review 1) 16,418 32.960 (16,5421 M'000
Ph 2 Can Gen Fber Optic Addition 17.669 17.669 - 17,700
i.Cable Tay Improvements, J 47 50.00) 67,527 (17,5271 413,100
6.Bush rd Intendant Trunk Replacement
r' 7.Mis.11tor ous Safety Projects
9. Ace.Rad.m to Can Gm Exhaust Piping,1193.1 75.000 75.000 -
d.isansfer from A.S..&E,3,f 507,000 507,000 -
Trasfer to Project Below 1507.000) - (507,000) -
r Fire Altura&Security System Upgrade,J-57 507,000 68,735 438,265 208,8D0
B.Miscellaneous Projects
c. Chemical Flow Pacing for Primary Influent,J-53 100.000 283 99,717 100.300
e.Allowance for Planned Small Projects 600.000 141.930 458.070 311,800
m 9.Water RaCIRalle an 5001000 - 5001000 -
Treral.to able H BN4W 000,000) - 1100.0(01 -
Transfer to Palmate Below 141.749) 141.749)
r OCSD/OCWD Regional Water Reclamation Pit Study.J-3 41.749 74,129 132.380) M4,100
10.Water Conservation
11, Rehab of Balsa Chico stets Beach Sewerage System.Ji S00000 613 599.387 sm.000
Sub.T.al -Merple.&Joint 13.871.000 6,611.020 7,269,972 13.165,000
r. Sub-Twee - Mslor Rojene 44.633.500 20,787.239 23.848,261 39,502.100
re
Section 3 - Page 3
1997-98 Mid Year Report
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Current Year
Li
For the Six Months Ended December 30, 1997
1997-98 1997.98 1997-98 +
1997-98 Actual Remaining Projected L
Eetimmad Outlet' 12131M7 Outlay Outlay
D.Fneineerine Special Pro rite
1.Master Planning u
e. Investigation and Relleb of Ocean OuOell.J-39 900.000 203.053 696,947 2D3.100
b.Memagement of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, .40-1 300,000 450,748 1150.7481 450.700
c. Deters. Of Fm Charges and Fee Sched.,J-40-2 200.000 226,706 126,7061 226,700
d. Treatment, Reuse entl Disposal Plan,J410-3 500,000 392,576 107.424 392.600
e. CEOA,Public Participation,J-40-4 250,000 39,125 210,875 3elD0
2. Miscellaneous Projects
a.Area Classifications Studies,Rams I &2,J-35-1 70,000 at 69,909 20,100
b. Revision of Standen Sceeifications,J-44 100,000 14.563 85,437 4 Aoo L
c. Edison Eavest Lighting Retrofit,J45 382,000 365.420 16.580 367,400
d.Evaluation of Existing Alum. Covers at Prim. Basins 50,000 - 50,000 - 1
Sub-Tala1-Engineering Special Projects 2.752,000 1,692,282 1,059.718 1.744,300 L
E General Services Adm'meuatlrn
3.Progremin,&Database Sys. (IT)
a. Document Management 130,000 1,047 120.953 130.000 L
b. Data mtegr.tion 700,000 700.000 520.000
Transfer to Projects Below f1G4.3211 - (164,3211 -
Natwork Integration Consulting 42,700 - 42.700 42,700 tt
Network interface upgrade 49,808 - 49,808 49.808 V
Fund Mgmt System G0,000 249 59,751 60.000
Network System Integration I IA13 11,813 - 11.800
c. Strategic Information Architecture ISIAI 430,000 22 429,978 430,000
d. CMMS Pr igmmmirg 110,000 13,467 96.533 110.000 Ya1
e. Inmmus, 44,000 19,872 24,128 44,000
I.Secuily System Improvements 256,000 34,696 220.304 34.900
Transfer to C,7A 1157,0001 - 1157,0001
g. Voice/Dma Building Rewiring 250,000 26,876 223.124 2500D0
h. Network Backbone Upgrade Continuation 190,000 165.890 14,110 165,900
L Imemet E-Meill8rowsing 44.000 34,510 9.490 44000 '
j.Year 20D0 Data Change 60.000 - 60.000 SO,0D0
I. FISIOrecle Gatawey 128,000 63,051 64,949 126.00c,
in.Financial Information System(IT) ;go,Ooo 400,662 (6621 6D0.DD0
n.Source Contra Programming 1WOOD 14,357 135.643 150,000
p. Upgrade Mumis System 38,000 27.811 10,189 30.000 V
a.GIS 214A00 - 214.000 214,000
4. Plant Automation(m
e. Desktop Computer Standard 100,000 70.136 29.884 70,100
It.Pies 2 Mont Water Programming Upends 1101000 63.738 46,262 63.700 L
c.Plant 2 City Water Programming upgrade 70.000 - 70.000 70.000
d.Mom 1 City Water Programming Upgrade 50.000 - 50,000 50.000
g.Mom 2 TWAS PLC ProgramlSCADA Upgrade 152.000 8.815 143,185 152.000 1
R Mass 2 DA PLC Pregram(SCAD&Upgrads 160,000 10,139 1"'BBI 14110,000 1 1
i. Plant 1 &2 Heat Lapp PLC RePlecamont 200.000 8.54G 191.462 9.000 1�
Ties;ar to Project Below 1200.0001 - 120010001 -
Entronica Upgrade at Rant 1 200,000 15.327 184,673 200,000
6.Plant Facilities IDEA)
c.Traming/Meeting Room Fleet Service Facility,Mind 1 18,000 233 17,767 18,000 L
d.Training/Meeting Room Fabrication Strop Facility,Pram 1 16,000 723 17,277 18,0go
Stle-Toul-General Services Administered. 3,874,000 991,962 2,882,018 3,905,908
L
Section 3-Page 4
V
CORF Review
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Current Year
For the Six Months Ended December 30, 1997
1997-98 199798 1997-M
rd 1997.98 Actual Remaining PiojecteE
Eatimered Goal @ 12131/97 outlay Outlay
FF Te ess
ua 1. Phase II L.I.M.S.Implementation 130,000 13l.900 11,900) 131,900
2. NPDES Permit Support 43,724 (43,7241 43.700
SubTotal-Technical Services 130,000 175.824 (46.824) 175.600
0. 0ae,eta.m&Malmo..0
r 1. Operations Deparmnem Projects
a.Upgrade to System for Emission Modeling Testing - 25.620 125.620) 25.600
b.Air Quality Database Development 36,000 28.711 6.289 35.00D
r C.Sulfur Monitoring for Combustion 33.000 3,369 29,631 33,000
d.Central Generation Parametric Monitor Sys 851000 - 85.000 85,000
I.Snubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 200.000 30,788 169,212 200,000
g.Anzac Gas Flaataticn Process Demonstrandon 125,0110 145 124,055 200
r h.Hydrolysis-thickening-floatation Demonstration 52,000 - 52,000 -
L large Scale Microfilhetion Demonatretian 59,ODO 13,682 45,318 59.000
j.Primary Effluent Filtration 80.000 123.131 143,1311 123,2DO
k.Processes to Achieve Class A Biosolids 40,000 - 40,000 35,000
'd m. H2O2 Deem,Feed Se.,for Influent Tmnks 40,000 - 40,000 -
Transfer to Project Below (39,205) - (39.2051 -
H2O2 Continuous Momfor/Pretreatment Automation Stu 39,205 - 39.205 39,205
_ n.Turbidity Monitoring&Regulatory Equipment Fee. 50,000 - 50.000 SD.000
P.Misc Optimization Studies&Improvements 140,000 35,382 104,618 35,400
Transfer to Projects Below (138,795) - 4138.7951
Pulse Pwr Enhancement of Solids Roc(Part III Eval 99,502 798 98,704 85.500
d Komax Steam Sims Miser Test 24,593 14,766 9,627 24,503
HTF Aocess labonnory Tests 14,700 26.496 411,796) 21.500
q.Miscelaneous Reliablir,,&Refund. Projects 50,000 ia,969 31,034 19.000
Screenings Cnnpactor Systems Instl.@ Rants 1 &2 - 136,672 (136,6721 136,70D
r Pit 2 Anionic Poh/mer Auomation - 36,BOa (36,806) 36.S00
2.Maintenance Department Projecs
c. Rent 2 MSP Vibration Monior Upgrade 11,574 - 11,574
I. Rebuild Serpinti,Conveyor at P2 Solids Station 92.426 - 92.426 -
r Transfer to Project Below 192.4261 - (92,4261
A43eh Rehab @Plant 2 Solids Loeding StoreOe Fee 92,426 - 92,426 SZ428
h.Backup Cooling Water Mod6ns at Pt Can Gen 35.000 - 35.000 35.000
yr I.Trickling Filter Clarifier Mechanical Rehab Invest. 60,000 - 50,000
j.Weir Extensions at Temiistion Channel 30.000 37,167 17,1671 37,203
Sut Total-Operations&Maintenance 1,208.f100 532,501 675.499 1.215.324
H.Equipment hems 1,942,700 859.199 1.083.501 1.942.700
Sub-Total-Joint Works Caphal Recuirnrenn 54,540,200 25.038,827 29,601.373 48.485.932
Construction In Progrem Competed At 6130197 - 264 705 1244.7051
r Total John Works Capital Requirements 54,540,200 25,283,532 29.256.668 48.485.932
r
Section 3 -Page 5
1997-98 Mid Year Report
u
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Project Life j
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997 �r
currant Total
Apprwed 6130197 Year Projected Remaining L
Prolan Acwmuleted Projected coat at Fuwm
Budget coat Cost 6f00798 Budget
A.Redemetlon Rem 1 New and Ongoing Pojecte: U
1. Neadwaka
a.Replacement of Man, 1 now Meters,P1-55 375,000 - - - 375.D00
b.M&D Structure Concrete Rep.,P1-56 501000 - 100 100 49,90() I f
c. Emergency Sewage Bypass System 1,992,000 - - - 1,992.O
d.Needworks No. 1 Ibbuild 14,950,000 - - - 14,950.000 Yrl
e. Neadworks No.2 Increase Caosciry 2,600,000 - - - 2.60C,000
2.Primary Treatment
a.Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,Pt-37 38,450,000 269,113 2g600 289,713 38,160,287
b.Prkn Clarifiers 3,4&5 Rehab. Pt<l 1.845.000 615.507 1,128700 1,7"X7 100,793
c.72 Mad Primary Treatment 32,500.000 - - 32,500.000
3.Secondary Treatment
a.Secondary Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD,PI-36-2 40.600,000 30,587,216 11 dD0,000 41,987,216 (1,387216)
Transfer to Project Below 065,00()1 - - (i65,000)
Value Engineering for SecorNery Treatment.P1-36-2 165,000 21,389 - 21,W9 143611
b.40 Mad Orypon Act'd Sludge&DAF's 65,463,000 - - - 65,463,000
c.40 Mg al Oxygen Act'd Sludge&DAF.2017 34,000,000 - - - 34.000000 L
d. Drain Mpdifirstions at Activated Sludge Went, Pi-59 75.000 - 21,4W 21,4tM 53,600
4. Solids Pracessma
e.Bert Presses(4 Units) 14,300,000 - - 14,300 MO
b. Solids Storage o Bins) 10,140,000 - - 10,140A00
c.Digesters: 2 @ 110-creation 911001000 - - - e100D00
d. Remove Trotting Fhers 1 &3 1.300,000 - - - 1,3000W
a.Remove Triesttrg Fibers 2&4,2007 1,300,000 - - - 1,3 m
f. 110-ft Digesters 18,200,000 - - - 16200,000
p.4 Belt Presses 10,920.000 - - - 10,GM,GDD
5. Electrical Power Systems
a.Electl. Factihy Modifies&Safery Up9redes,Pi-40-1 1,537.000 162,023 390W 2011023 1,335len j
Transfer to C.7.d 1350.0001 - - (350.000) U
b. 12KV Distribution SWUm for Support Facilities.Pt<7 4,800.000 255,832 S4.700 310.532 4,489,468
c.66KV Substation Addition,P1-52 1,384,000 39.307 44,100 63,407 1=.593
it. l lkv Ekc1nical Power Distribution 2,450,000 - - Z,vx. 00 i I
e. 12 KV Power Distribution.2001-2012 1.099,000 - - - 1,1199.000
f.Standby Power Generation.2W5&2015 4,914," - - - 4,914,001)
6. Sefety I.Pninn rents
a.Fro Protection,Signs and Water Sys Mods..P1-38-5 2.685,100 1.749,926 876.000 2.625,926 0.174
b.Sam.Retrofit of N.rStructum Systems,P1-43 114461000 942,431 254.700 1,M7,131 218,889
C.Seismic Retioft Structure hems, lsl 4 1,2.3,4 3.819.000 2.274,448 216,500 2.490,948 1,328,052
d.Railings for Aeration Basins,Pt-53 200.000 - - - 200,000
7.Miscellaneous Projeco
a. Fac Modifro&Safery Upgrades,P1.40-2 1.665,000 751,045 fi0U,000 1,551.045 lases L
It.Drainage Impmv. At More 1.P1- 3 220,000 - 104AM 104.600 lls,ec0
C. Chemical Facility Mo lifro,P1-46-2 2.960.000 481.385 10.000 4a9,3e5 Zdao615
d.Admin.Old, Lobby Acoustical Moo.P1-54 125.000 - 8.900 B,800 11820D
e.Mowanca for Panned Smell Projects 4,975.000 89,710 430,7110 00.410 4,464,14111) U
Sub-Taol -Reclamation Plea l 332.089,10D 38.239.332 15,447,900 53.687,292 zle. 0 ,8B8
B.Rem 2 New and Ongoing Major Projeete:
1. ffeedwons
a.Plant 2 influent Diversion,P2-66 Z4100.00D - 31,400 31,40U 2,3e8,B00
b.nepace n.nt of a nacreen Influent Get..P2 63 170.000 - 5,000 5.000 185.000
c.Needwarka-C- Upgrades 2,500,000 - - - 2,500,000 i
r✓
V
Section 3-Page 6
u
CORF Review
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements-Project Life
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997
Current Total
Approved! GIM197 Yee, projected Remaining
•+ Prof.. Accumulated Pre)ecte i Coat at Future
Bud,m Con Cost 6,30,198 Bud90
S.Ram 2 New and Organ Major RolactelCont.l:
2.Printery Treatment
r o.Primary Treetmam 24 MGD Expansion.P2-41 14,306.000 8.293 - 8.293 14,297,707
b.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P2.48 4.971,000 2,386.820 2.782.000 5,168,820 (197,820)
Transfer to prelates Below 153,3601 - - (53,3W)
L&M Prim Sed Clarifeu Pump Room Equip Upgrade 20,810 - 1,500 1.500 19.310
r N&O Arm Sed Clearness Pump Room Equip UP9redo 32,550 - - - 32.550
C.Clarifier Efficiency Improvmments 1,700,000 - - - 1,700,000
d.Dean Reels coIn.t at Primary Basins A,B. C,P2-67 200.000 1,000 1,000 199,000
e.Replace Primary Basins A. B.C 11,700.000 - - - 11,700,000
we 3.Secondary Tmabnent
a.Rehab Activated Sludge Ram Piping and Velvin8 1.110.000 - - - 1,110,000
4.Stiles Processing
a.Rehab 7 Diffusion,P2-39 16.395.000 812,727 Q.MO Mai, 15,541.573
b.TWAS Feed to Messrs.F&G,P2-39-1 180,0110 - 163,800 163,800 16.200
c.Salida Storage: 2 Buns 5,200,000 - - - 5,200.000
d.Scale Replacement M Dinstuaing Facility,P2d62 87.000 - - - 87.000
e.Additional 105 Few Different 5.100,000 - - - 5100,000
r d.Rehabilitate Solids Storage Equipment,P2.60 79,966 - 79.988 (79.986)
S.Ehimmull Power Swtema
a.Digester Gas Compreaeor Redundanc,J-19.2.1 470,000 - - - 470.000
b.Ele ll Fee ModiMe&Safety UpBredes.P237.1 3.976A00 261,446 109,300 370.746 3,8114,254
C.Sunday Power Generation 16.120.000 - - - 16.120.OD0
6.Safety Improvements
a.Fire Protection,Sipes&Water Sys MMifrs,P246 3.763,000 2,661,076 78&BW 3,449.075 313,125
ow Transfer to Project Below 1177,660) - - - (177,660)
Reclaimed Water firteneion to Nwks'C',P246-2 177.660 869 151,000 151.me 25.791
b.landsc.&Imp.At City Water Pump St..P2.451 35.000 - 25,800 26.900 8,100
c.Fee Modifna&Safety Up9ades.P247-2 L630,000 646.244 800.000 1.446.244 183.756
d.Saimic Retrofit o1 Non-Structure Systems.P2-50 1,680.000 617.651 1,0131,600 1,879,151 849
e.Seismic Retrofit,Structural items P2.53.2 3.955,000 3.660.645 721,000 4,281,545 (MASS)
I. Chemical and Ram Water Modi .,P2-55 4,132.000 3,305.728 847.000 4,152728 (20,725)
a.Reclaimed Water System Pan.2 3.335,000 - - 3.335.000
r 7.Miscollensous Projects
a.Air Compuesors for More All Swum.P2.61 250,000 - - - 250,000
b.Odor Control at Junction aM Disbit ution Bases 560.000 - - - 560.000
c.Conveyor Bet Acaea at Sofids Storage 80,000 - - - 80.000
yr d.Allowance for Finance Smell Projects 5.146,000 267.110 OUSAW 876.710 4,M.290
B.Support Facilities and Site Improvements
a.Wardemse Building,P2-66 1,179.000 72.800 n.9DO 1,108,200
b.Maintenance guiding,P2-35.3&-1 91358.000 4.666,030 2,032.000 6,698.030 2.859.970
r Tmrefer to Project Below 164.5441 - - - (64,544)
Trereermn upgrades at O"nuing Center 64,544 27,055 - 27,055 37,489
c.Phase II She&Security Imp..P2.35.5 1,226.000 806,013 635,600 1,441,613 (215.613)
�..I d.Opereeore Building,P2.23.541Rebid No.21 3,615,000 3,517.256 8.200 3.M.456 89,544
Sub-Taal -Treatment Rem 2 126.528.000 23,060,439 10.889,200 34.5411 91,978,361
aw
yr
r
Section 3-Page 7
1997-98 Mid Year Report
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Project Life
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997
Currant Total
Approved 6130197 Year Projected Remelning
project Accumadett Projected Cost at Future
Moffat Cost Cost BrJ0198 Budget I
C.Merylent and Joint pinaMee I ',
1.Support Facil'nod,end Site Improvements Ykl
a.Admintreennai n Perking Lot 322.60D - - =500
b. Demolition or Rdi of Old Cpmrol Cantor 200,000 - - - 200,000 , 1
..CaraM on of Support Bldg.@Pft2,J 27 215.000 109,504 - 108,50 i 105,498 Li
d.CNG Refueling Staten,Pt-51 1.020.400 385,8M l,M400 1,694,244 (SM.844) YY�ill
e.Open Bey Encl.....et Pit 1 wdrahoaee 90,OOO - - - 90,ODD
2.Oinfol&Booster Pump Stations
a.Surge Tower Replacement.J-34-1 7.155,000 2.708,404 7.151.900 SIM'3ot (2,705.") L
b.Cattail Reliability,Is Pumping Amex OOSS'C'J-34 31,085.000 - - 31,085.000
c.Est&Ropl 78-to Deep Mister w/120'Ounall 15.120.000 - - - 16.120.000
3.Infoorma.n Management Stations
a.Computerized Fac.Records end Deng.Sys..425-1 3.930.000 631.093 124,100 755,193 3.174.807 L
4.Rene 1112 MOMt«/Carsol sM
is.OOBS's Corona!SM.,J-31-2 1,793.000 1,327.9B3 A500 1.=,483 480,517
C.Inant 1 Heedw«ka Syatam.J-31.3 1.313.7W 3,196 SWOOO 639.196 674,584 I
it.Secondary Control Synods Upgrade,Plant 2,J-314 1J09,000 37,081 83.900 120,881 1,618.019 u
is.Rant MinvantonlAutonvolon Project,J 12 25,760.000 63,071 534,400 5 .Mi 25,181,929
Transfer to Raje«Below 436,1261 - - - (38,126)
'C'Hwks Barscreen&Mac Alems 36,128 - 11.000 11,000 25,125
f.Solids Stories Rehab and Automation,J46 5.06,000 - 229,700 M.1,110 5,408,300
5.Electrical Power Srotem.
a.Me Mixing Systems Improvements.J-25.3.1 470,000 - 500 50D 489,500
b. Eject.Power Systems period.Studied,J-26 2,3,4 5.515,000 581.048 359.000 910.848 4.574,352
C.Sunday Power Reliability Mail 1334 15.391,000 903.280 237,300 1,140,6000 14,250,420
d.MSP No. 3 an Haedworks 2,J-33-2 1,100•000 - 815,300 675.300 424,700
e. Mmmic Filters Aunionatim,J-48 50.000 - - 50,000
I.Power&Distdbuton Bldg.Ventilation.J-50 la0,000 - 100 tOD 139,900
9.Electrical Power Dirtdb«ion,12kv 2.107.000 - - - ;707,OOD
h. Improvements to Central Generation Sao.000 - - - Sao.000
Transfer to Projects Below (169.7601 - - - (166,780) I j
Steam System Medlin 34.600 1,147 - 1.147 33,463 lisp
Battery Sys Addn at Central Generation 80,560 37.154 - 31.154 20,405
Erltronica Remand&Software Upgrade(Revision 1) 63.000 16.739 3e000 49.739 13261
R1 2 Con Gen Rbsr Optic Addition 11.600 17,700 17,700 (6,100)
i.cable Tray enslavement, J-47 2.750,000 11.641 413,1D0 424,611 2,325,359
6.Mahetd Interplont Trunk Mail...Mo. 26,100,000 - - - 28,100,000
7. Miscalmorind safety Projects
a.Acc.Rotl«m to Can Gen Estill Noma.J-19-3.1 75.000 - - - 75,000 I
Ir.Confined!Space personnel Retrieval System,J 49 300,000 - - 300,000 V
c.Evaluation of Tunnels for Simctural Ime«xy,J-55 176.000 - - - 175,000
it.Transfer ftom A,S,e&E,3.1 807,001) - - 507,000
Transfer ad Pralect Below (507.0001 - - - (5117.O0))
Fire Alam&security Sysem Upstate.J 57 507,000 20gWU 208,800 2982M
e.MNceBsreoae Rejects
a.In Rem Sempli g System Madifn 70.000 - - - MOD0
Transfer to Project gold. 130.260) - - (30280) I
Fired sampler System Upgrades 30200 19.314 - 19.314 tests y
b.Mw Grit Rogers.J-52 0001000 - - &00,000
c.Classical Flow Pacing for Nina.,Inflaent.J 53 100.000 100.300 100'SM (300) 1
it.AB&6 Flowmeter giraffe 300,000 - 300,001) lu
e.And....for Named Small projects 4.605.000 330.468 311.930 642,388 3,882,832
1
Section 3- Page S u
L'
CORF Review
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Project Life
�- For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997
Commit Taal
Approved 6/30M)7 Year Projected Remaining
Project Accumulated Projected cooled Future
jtl funded, Con Cost 613N98 Budget
C.Irrtarolant and!John Fsa6da Coast.):
9.Water Rackmnlen 1161000.000 - - - Ile.00i
Trevfar to Line H Below
Transfer to Projects Below (66010D01
Heclmaton Rent No. 1 Water Ouway Management Stec 280,000 1,693 - 1,693 275,307
OCSD/OCWD Regional Water Reclamation Ph Study,J-3 400,000 207,364 224.100 431,464 pl',fet)
10.Wash.Coneervetbn 5,150,000 511601000
Rehab of Bola Chico State Beech Sewerage Stamm,J. 54,04 e00,000 star 4 tess' 4)
& Tam -Interplant 4,Jamt 279,106,660 7.466.819 13,105,000 20,631,819 256,534,841
Sub-Tram - Myer Frojeca 737,783,760 09,368,690 39,502.100 10&86&880 628.915.070
r D ErMroedr,o s,r,MA AdMe
1.Meier Premrmg
a.Immmoron and Rehab of Ocean Outfall,J-39 1,439,000 492,1195 203,100 685,795 753,805
b,MamaOerm.of Fees Hydeulic Discharge,J-40.1 1,637,000 1,607,821 450,700 2.058.521 (421,621)
g.Dotti Of Fin Ch.ges and Far,Schad-J40-2 481,000 364,616 226,700 591,315 (110.315)
d.Treatment.Reuse and D'aposal Asm,J40.3 933,000 ","a 392.60D 442.046 490,964
e.CEOA.Public Ferdapshion,J40-4 411,000 36,672 39.100 75,772 335228
2.Miscellaneous Projoca
a.Ante CIeaH6utions small",Plante 1 &2.J-35.1 70.000 - 20.100 20.100 49,900
III.Revision of Stallard Specifications,J-41 240,000 - 44.600 0.000 195,400
c.Edison Emmet Lighting Retrolk,J46 441,400 6,153 367,400 373,553 $7,847
r d. Evaluation of emitting Alum.Coven at Prim.Bala 50,000 50,000
Sib-T.al-Engineering special Pralects 5,703,000 2,547,402 1,7a4,300 4.291.702 1.411.298
E.General feMcn„Admldaudalao
ye 1.General Services Adminktr.i0n
a.GSA-Mlscelereoa Small Projects 626.000 - - - 625,000
b.Tell Servicea Mora 250,000 - - - 25D.=
2.End User Support(IT)
a.Miscalereoue Smell Project. 21.000 - - - 21.000
3.Programieg&Dnabsse Sys.(M
e. Document Menagomam 800.000 - 130.000 130,00) 87&000
b.Dena Integration 4,334,00) 520,000 520,000 3.814,D00
r Thirst.to Projects Below (152.508) - - (152.506)
Network Integration Cansuldin9 42.700 24,673 42,700 67.373 (24.673)
Network Interface Upgrade 49.808 43.379 49.808 0,187 (43,379)
Fuel Mean SYshom 601000 M.946 60.000 tosses (44.946)
r Network stiff.Inmention - 412,876 11.8013 424,876 (424.678)
c.Strategic Information Architecture MIA) 724.000 - 43&000 430,000 284,000
d.CMMS Programmin 179,000 - 11&000 110,000 69.000
a.Intranet 62,000 - 44,000 44,000 38A00
r I.S.udry SYstmm Inn'..... 27a,000 - 34.700 34.700 243.300
Traaf.to C,7.d 1167,ODOa - - - 057,000)
g.Volcm/Dom Bulldirg Rewiring 438,000 53.558 250,0DO asaA 8 134,442
A Network Backbpre Upgrade Conlvaration 624,000 261.791 1&6,9133 417.891 21630E
r I. motet FMeill&owan9 70,000 - ".ow 4/,000 28.000
1.Year 20M Dote Change 213,000 - 60.000 OD.= 153.=
it.WVIW Server 161.000 - - - 161,000
I.FISIOrtrde Gamwey 400.000 - 128,0D0 128,000 272,000
r m.Financial Information System Im 2,025.000 1,173,234 No,= 1,773234 MI,766
n.source Comes Programming 216,000 - 150,0DO IN,= G&OOD
o.Dore Extraction from Plem Control Sysem 186.000 - - - 185.000
r
Section 3-Page 9
as
1997-98 Mid Year Report
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Project Life L
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997
current Total
Approved 6/30197 Year Projected Ramalnln9
Rpjeet Accumemse Projected comet Future
Budget Con Coat 6130198 Budget
5,Ga a al S.M.,",intention,ICpN.):
p.Upgrade Prom Sysem 68.000 167.101 Wa000 197,101 (129,101) V
q.GIS 383,000 - 214,000 214,000 1691000
4.Rant Automation Ira
a.Dechop Computer Standard 862,000 M.100 n1,100 n".900 I
It.Ram 2 Rem Water Rogmmming Upgrade 110,000 BW,7W 63.700 46.300 y
c.Rem 2 Crry Water Programming Upgrade 70.000 - M.DD0 70,000 -
d.Ram 1 City Water Rogremmirg Upgrade 50,000 50,W0 W000
e.Rem 2 Dawaterin9 Comm System UP9rade 700,000 - - - 700.000 1
f.Rem 1 Dewmar ng corm system Upgrade 400.000 - - 400.000 la1
9.Rem 2 TWAS PLC Rogram/5CADA Upgrade 152,000 - 152,OD0 152,DDO In.Ram 2 DAFT KC Roeram/SCADA Upgrade 180.000 - 180,000 180,000 -
i. Ram 1 &2 Neet lnop PLC Replacemen "OooD 9,000 9,000 431,000 L
Tramfar to Project Below 1200,0001 - - - (M.000)
Entromcs Upgrade m Rent 1 2G0,000 - 200,000 20a000 -
j.Rem 1 &2 R ary Clarifier Rehab.SCADA Cem,uratio 85,000 - - - 85.000
k.Rem 1 Seconder,Trearment SCADA 185,000 - - 185,0D0
S.Conatmon Facilities IGSA1
a.Ram 2 New 0&M fBuildrg Furniture 20,ODO - - - 2aOD0
b.Are We Memo, 300,000 - - - 300.000 �
6.Rant Fecilifiae(GSA) L
a.Office Furniture for New O&M Building 25,000
b.Ubrary system for New 0&M Building 32.000 - - - 32.000
c.Training/Meeting Room Fleet Service Facility,Ram 1 181000 - 200 200 17,800
d.Trainin,iWeeting Room Fabrication stop Fecifity,Ram 1 18,000 - 111,000 18,Goe -
e.Districts'Tishri,Reaourp Canter 200.000 1B4O00 18,oto 1S2P00 Lrl
Sodo-Taml-am 15.766.000 2,207,109 3.905.90E 6,113,M 9.65AM
F Tedea W Servime
1. Pbese II L.I.M.S. Implamentadon 505,000 197,027 131,900 32B,927 176,073 L
2. NPDES Pmmit Suppon 150.001) 578.951 43.700 622,651 (472,651)
Sub-Total-Tecloucal services 665.000 775.978 175.600 951,578 (PB&578) I
a Dual..&Nhmmu,ma u
1.Oman..Dulnum era Rgects
a.Upgrade ro System for Emission Modeling Testing 40.OD0 333 25.600 M'S33 14.057
b.Air Duality Database Development 125.000 4.543 35.000 39,5a3 85,451, ,
c.Sulfur Monisomg for Combustion 1s6,000 33,000 33,000 152,000 V
d.Central Generation Perennial.Monitor Sys 454,500 3.519 B5,000 88,519 afaliel
a.Bbfiker/Biottcking Fiber Demonstnkm 85,000 - - 8&DOD
f.Scrubber CNarniral Feed System Mod. B25,OOD 4,667 200,000 20a,867 420,333
g.Anosic Gas Flotation Rocps Demonstration 126.000 200 201) 124.800 L
R Myroolysis-tldckemrg-flcatrtion Demomtation 52.000 - - 52.000
L lage Sub Microfilfrnion Demonstration 89.0DO 59.000 59,DD0 -
1.Rimer,Mount FNretion 80.000 123.200 123.200 (43200) j
L Processes to Acbieye Ones A aosolidc 90.000 35,000 35.000 55,0110
I.WAS Drying wbnRrt Digestion 76,000 - - 76,000
in.N202 Dean Feed Samar for Influent TruMs 40,000 - - 40,000
Tramf ,1p Rc ect Below (39.205) - - (39R05)
H202 Continuous MonbonPreaenment Automation Stu 39.205 39,205 39.205 - L
n.Turbidity Monitoring&Regulatory Equlpmem Fee. 65.000 Sa000 50,000 35,000
o.Full-scale Bummlids Reduction 1,500,000 - - 1,5011,000
L
y
Section 3-Page 10
L
CORF Review
Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements—Project Life
�— For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997
current Total
Approved e/30197 Year Projected glamouring
r Saixt Anamuleted "reard Copp Future
Budmt curt coat Br30198 Budget
P.Marc OWlmuadon Seal&ImWolmeram a 430.000 35.400 38400 3B .m
r Testate,to Rower Below (138.795) - - (138.795)
Pulse Pwr Enhancement of solids Pra IPed 8)Eval 99.502 61.105 ae,see 147,805 (49103)
Komm Steam SteOc Mixer Test 24,593 9,245 24,593 MAW (9,245)
HTF Process Utiorerory Teem /4.700 7 28,500 28,507 (11,807)
r q.Mmcelanoaue gellability&Radical. Projects 150.000 19,000 19,000 131,000
Transfer to Prajecte Below (1001") - - (100.000)
Energy DerepWation Study 57,298 539 - me 56,729
Scrambler;Compactor Strait..Imtl.@ Rene 1 &2 130,000 433 136,7l10 137.133 (7.133)
r Rt 2 AnbWc Polymer AMinnown 95,600 - W,800 W.800 588m
2. Wintert,neg Department Project,
e.Rent 2 Digni Gm Flare Comrol Sys Ullede 140,000 - - - 140,000
b.Rem 2 Twok Loading VFD Replacement 90,000 - - - so,=
r c.Rant 2 MP Kbration Monitor Upgrade 04,000
d.Rem 1 Headworks Scrubber Pump Modifns 30,001)
e.Bex Prep Dove Unit Replacement 20.000 - - - 211,000
_ f.Rabulkl SWpimu Comreyar p P2 Sofde Station 07,000 - - 97.000
Tramiel to Reject Below (92.426) - - - (92,426)
A-Bog Rehab @ Rant 2 Wide Long Storage Fee 92.425 - 92,42e 92.425 -
g.Rao Wieore ReclWmed Water Meter Station at P2 li - - - 55,000
h.Backup Coolers Water Modfns at P1 Cen Gen 35.000 - 35.000 35,000 -
I.Trickling Filter carrier MapAanical Remb Invpt. 60.000 - - - $0.000
).Welt Eeteroions at Taminknion Chenrel 30,000 372DO 37200 (7,200)
SuRTWeI.Ooaretlpns&Mehterenee 4.845,388 120,002 1215,324 1,336,328 3.910,042
H.Equipmam Rem. 24A42,70D - 2,147,162 1,962,700 4,O8g,882 20.=.838
9 Total-Joht Works capital Reakemems 789,295,028 77,184,303 4A495,932 125,800,235 883.845,580
r construction In Saari completed At 6130197 84,41113,479 81,493A79 (M.493A79)
Total blur Works capital Reyiremenm 789,295,028 161,657,782 48,485,932 210,143,714 579152114
sl
kw
Section 3- Page 11
1997-98 Mid Year Report
�I
u
u
li
L
This Page Left Intentionally Blank. L
L'
l
L'
L
u
it
Section 3-Page 12
L�
u
li
SECTION 4.
BUDGET REVIEW BY DISTRICT
I�
u
J
�1
.�I
Budget Review by District
All Districts Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31197
Operating Budget Review
1997-98 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Dale Budget %Expanded
r REVENUES:
Tax Levy(No.11 Bond Fund Only) 10,000 5,399 4,601 53.99%
Tax Allors5ans/Subven ons(Sham of l%) 30,342,000 15225238 15.116.762 50.18%
u Connection Fees 5,893,000 3.641,003 2251,997 61.79%
(RIND Fees 2.300,000 1,096,900 1203,100 47A9%
Other Fees 71278,000 24,302,698 46,975,302 34.10%
Sale of Capacity Rights 1,574,500 - 1,674.500 -
`� Interest&Misc.Receipts 21,96 .000 11.687,914 10270,066 6323%
Other - 40.765 (40.755) -
Total Revenues 133,355,500 55.999.917 77,355,553 41.99%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works TM Plant 64,540200 25283,532 29256,6SB 46.36%
`^ Olstrict Trunk Serer Construction 11,4110,500 2,084,059 9,399,431 18.15%
COPMand Retirement and Nterest Expense 34251.000 20,731,386 13.519,614 60.53%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 46.922,650 21,357,800 25,564.850 4552%
Disbid Operating S Other Expenditures 9,121,700 2.819.986 6.301,714 30.92%
Toni Outlays 156,316,050 72,276.773 84.039277 4624%
v Capital Facilities Budget Review
Bolen Adluslosnts Transfer to Balance
s. 71197 &Additions Fixed Assets 1=197
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Districis 1-14 CorraWction in Progress 25,454214 2,084.069 - 27,538283
Y�
Share of Joint Works 74,857,231 25.263,532 - 100.140.763
Sub-Total 1D0,311,445 27,367.601 127,679,046
r COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Right 2,656265 - - 2.655.255
Collection Lines and Purrp Stria. 292,316,954 - - 292,316.954
m' Trmbmnt Facilitles 19,922 - - 19,922
Disposal Facilities 101,528 - - 101,528
General Plant and Adnun.Facil. 880.037 - - 680,037
s, Equity in J4ad Treevrenl Feral. 677236206 - - 6T7.236206
Other Asset at Cost Less AmorL 133,381 - (35,004) 98.377
Sub-Toml 973.344293 - (35,004) 973.3D9289
Tent Property,Plant B EAU 1pment&CIP 1,073,655.738 27.367,601 (35,DD4) 1100,958.335
Section 4-Page 1
1997-98 Mid Year Report
District 1 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31197 LI
Operating Budget Review
1997-98 Year-To. Remaining Year-toDate
Budge Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES: L
Tax Lary(Bond Fund(s)Only)
Tax AllocaborWSrAverrtan(Sham of 1%) 2,000,000 1,097.892 902,108 54.69% I
Correction Fees 489.000 4.484 464,516 OM% L
Oder Fees 7,169,000 2.576,648 4,592,352 35.94%
Sale of Capacity Rights 148,000 - 148,000 - i
Interest&Mist.Receipts 941,000 524,960 416,040 55.79% I..1
Other - 12,126 (12.126) -
Total Revenues 10,727,000 4216,110 6,510,890 39.30%
OUTLAYS: L
Share of Join Works Tmd.Plant 5,634.000 2,644,658 2,989,342 46.94%
District Trunk Sevier Co bucbon 100.000 - 100,000 0.00% ! j
COP/Sond Refirerren and Interest Expense 4,393,000 2,640,391 1,752.11M 60.10% Y.I
Share of Join Works Operating Expenses 4,804,900 2,379,259 2,425.641 49.52%
District Operating&Other Expenddures 575,750 254,300 321,450 44.17%
Total Outlays 15,507.650 7,918.608 7,589,042 51.06%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 1�
7111197 &Adtlitions Fixed Assets 12131W
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
r
2-30 Memory Lane Interceptor 72 72
SuaTotal 72 - - 72
Share of Jan Works 7,526,531 2,644,658 - 10,171.189
SYtTTotal 7,526,603 2,644,658 - 10,171,261
r
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Lad and Prop"Rights 81,39B - - 81,398
Cdlectim Unes and Pump Strce. 6,902,929 - - 6,902,929
Treatment Facilities - - - -
Dispose Facilities 11,593 - - 11.593
General Pen and Achim Fail. 58,241 - 58,241
Equity in Joint Treabrie d Facil. M,918,038 - - 70,918,038
Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - -
Sub-Total 77,972.199 - - 77,972,199
Total Property,Pefn&Equipment&CIP 85,498.874 2.644,658 - 881143,532 1
Ui
V
Section 4-Page 2
I
Budget Review by District
District No. 2-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 1201/97
Operating Butlaet Review
IM48 Year-To Remaining Year-To4ate
r Mosel Date Budgal %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax levy(Bad Furd(s)Only) - - -
Tax Nlamtma/Sutvemlone(8hsmofl%) 9,430,000 4,652,9W 4.M.074 49.34%
Connection Fees 2466000 1,508,733 957267 51A8%
Other Fees 23,440,00o 7.442.794 15.997,206 31.75%
Sale of Capacty Ri9Ma 566,500 - 566,500 -
ar Iraensl 8 Misc.Receipts 6,591.000 3.W7,789 3=211 53.W%
M. - 1242 (1,242)
Total Revenues Z493,500 17,lW.4W 25,W)0()16 Atom%
OUTLAYS:
r Sham of.bint Wxla Tmt Plant 15.W3,80o 7,365.GM 8,5M.M7 4 31%
District Trunk Senor Construction 70.000 116276 646,724 15.24%
COP/Bond Retremordandlmeresl Expense 11,096,000 7,023,ln 4,0M,827 W29%
ra Sham of Joint Wale Operamil E.M. 14.982,450 6,877211 8,105.239 45.90%
DistiC OperelingSOUa ExeandMrea 2,551.400 M.815 1,751,585 31.W%
Total Outtsye 45,296.650 22,181,568 M.115.062 48.97%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance ASJu.b nts Tranebrto Balance
7M187 BAddieons Filed Assets 1201197
OONBTRUCTgN IN PROGRESS:
2-144IR2 SARI Manhole 425.348 49.997 475,343
2-7Ahicod Suttrunk MoeTioul. 107.294 - 107,294
2-38 Otve SuhWM B SARI Crossirg 13.625 - 13,625
2.37 Miscellaneous lmprovemanls to Pump Stators 6,199 29,870 36.069
2419 SACSR Eeaemenl MadMcub. 16,197 1,074 17271
SA River Trunk Flood Protector 35,224 - 36.224
sr AsElt Drawings Coyne Canyon 15.763 - 15,763
2-MMVIPA Trunk lure 2,984 - Z984
2-33 Palm Ave.Purelmse Agreement 2.nl - 2.761
Foul Air Bypass®SARI 3,129 - 3.129
y 2-W Eudid Trunk a intemeplor 14,524 - 14,524
IS F"Wdemirg Project - 25.384 25,384
240 Repl SARI Conbl B Gate - 4,779 4,779
241 SARI Realignment 8 Protector - 4,344 4.344
r Miscelleneoue Charges W Closed W.O. 1,923 828 2.751
Su Toal 644,959 116276 - 761,246
Sheroof Jdnt Wedm 21.862,418 7,365,093 - 29227.611
er SutrTotel 22.507.387 7,481,369 - 29,988,756
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANr A EQUIP:
lard and Property Rights 517.69,1 - - 517.694
CogectionlJnis"Pump Sturm_ 96,894,699 - - MAMAS
Treatment Fadrdies - -
gaposalFamilies 33,172 - - 33,172
rr General Plant and Admin.Fecil. 215,420 - - 215.420
Equflyin Joint Teatment Facd. 1972 .W - - 197206.085
Other Assets alCealle96AmM. 19.216 - (10220) am
Sut-Total 294,6116.486 - (1022D) 294.876266
.0 Total Property,Plant B Ell uIpment BLIP 317.393.873 7,481.369 (10220) 324AW.022
.. Section 4-Page 3
1997-98 Mid Year Report
District No. 3 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/97 L
Operatina Budget Review
1W." Year-To- RmnaWn9 Year-TodaW I I
Budget bate BudBnt %Expended L
REVENUES:
Tax Levy(Bond Furvl(s)Only) - - - - 1
Tax Allaealiorrel5uhavrdans(Share of l%) 10,230,000 5,127294 5,102,706 50.12% L
Conrm,tj.Fens 1,345,000 1.056.060 278.940 7926%
Other Fees 23,045,000 8.078,718 14.966,282 35.06%
Sale of Cepaciy Rights 430.000 - 430,000
I"est&Misc.Receipts 7.3 ,000 3,918,445 3,445,554 5321% L
Other - 1.932 (1.932) -
TotalRavenues 42.414,000 18,192,450 24,221,560 4269%
OUfLAYB:
Share of Jcrd 4\brla Tma Place 16,651.IDD 7,711,477 8,939,623 46.31%
District Trunk Serer Co uka 5,049.000 985206 4663792 19.51%
COP/Band Retiremamondlyderest Eapense 11,394.000 6.352.665 5,031,345 S564%
Shen,of Jdm Wbrks Opsn,m E Wp 13.M,600 6,097,652 7.1126,948 43.78% L
t ietrid Omabn9&Other Eipend1was 2.181200 607.929 1,673271 23.2IM
Total Ostla" 49,201,900 21,664,921 27,536.979 44.03%
Capital Facilities Budget Review L
Balance MJushnenb Trensferte Balance
7n1BT &Addhions Fled Assets IMIA17 I
eoNSTR11CffON IN PROGRESS: L
3250=n VAstem Su?Trunk Relief5euer - - - -
11-17 Slater PM Up9moe-3&11 1,374,847 - - 1,374,847
336 Techha Pipe 11.0 nem 2,121200 72U - 2.128,452
336R Rapl.Wbsaninster A..Force Mahe 4,400,345 - - 4,400,345 L
3371-8 wtienirg Project 34.172 2,651 - 36,823
337-1 Magndta Tnmk Serer lmprwmmds 5,651 11,153 16,804
338 Miller-W,kv Trunk Saner lmpmvements 512.679 - - 512.679 I
33 p 8-11mm✓.W Millerlldder Trunk Serer a4,619 81,265 - IMAM Lri
33831mprev,to Miller-Wrier Trunk Sever 263,909 322,591 - 586,500
339Mt1w-Wd EmewM 6,752 - - 8,752
237 Miscellanm Impmv is to Pump Stations 10,540 - 10,540 II I
a35R.1 Mat,Trmik Vkst 1,401,oll 551,905 1,962.916
33-1 Relocate Ponice of Los Alamims Sewer 50600 - 50,000
3 l Magnolia Relief Math.. - 1,541 1.541
340 Seel Beach New BYPass - 4,30 4.393
Miecdleneoue Chagas to Oocetl W.O. 3.756 2,467 - 6,213 u
Sub-Total 10.271481 9852M - 11,256689
Shamof Jdrd Works 22,S77,426 7,711,4T7 - 30.288,903
Sul,Totel 32848,907 8,M.685 - 41,545,592
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT A EQUIP: I
lartl and Property Rights 280231 - - 280231 J
cdiecicnlinesond PupStrte 63.322.568 - - 63.322,5as
Treab.—I Fac88ss 9,922 - - 9,922
Disposal FaclN 28.419 - - 28.419
Genoial Plant and Admin.Facl. 317,991 - - 317,991 Yd
Egdlyln JdMTreatment Fact. 206.589289 - - 206.589289
ONer Aesata et CaM lass Artpd. -
SuD-Total 270.548,418 - 270,548416 L
Tool Prapery,Plant B Equipment&GP 303,397,325 8,696.m - 312.094,010
J
Section 4-Page 4
L
Budget Review by District
District 05-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
_ 6 Months Ended 12/31197
Operating Budget Review
r 1997-86 Yee,To Remainlrp Year-To .
Budget Date Bud6at %EkPancied
REVENUES:
Tex Lev,(Bond Fuld(e)Only) - -
r Tax AlloaEonsniutve�ns(Sake of l%) 2,550,000 1,28e,598 1.265,402 60.38%
Corn on Fees 224,000 189.232 34.769 84.48%
Other Fees 2,MAM 817,660 1,912.10 29.96%
Sam olcapedty R gft Wage - 58.000 -
r Irltmed AMix.Receipta 1,117.000 906,151 910,846 52.78%
Otlrer - 449 ("a) -
Total Revenurm 7277,000 3,198,283 4p78,707 43.95%
OUTlAYB:
r Shma of bird ftft Trmt Plat 2,136,000 996.171 1 141,829 46.59%
Ulstnd Trunk Sewer Caebucum 89II'm 421.032 276,96& 60.32%
COP19erul Retcemenl aW lntamM Expeme 1'se6oto 1255.664 582,338 WS3%
r Slane of JoiM Woha Operating Expenses 1,n8,400 875.670 902,730 4924%
DNbid Opeftm;&Omm Exmndibuea 7"2M 28%374 457,876 38.48%
Total Outlays 7226,550 3,864,911 3,361,739 53.48%
r Capital Facilities Budget Review
R.W. Adluebrwab Tramhr to Belana
7nw &AddhAve FIxMAaaeM 1N31m7
r CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
635So.Corot Trunk Sa- r4nd Plmma 1&2 3,965 Its - 4,098
536 Crystal Cow PIS 6,477 - - 8,4n
53 2Bamxle Drive T.k lo9,689 Items
r 237Miamlia.lmpmvamenmroPumy Steno. 18.599 - 18.599
Lfdo PIS a 2 MSP Upgrade 5,3s1 - 5.381
541-1 Udo Pump Burton Rebation 19,867 140.2W 159,876
5 abler Pt B Rocky Pt P51mpmv.586 514 - - 514
8 7364 PCN Gravity S.ReSab 5&6 588,873 2,131 - 591.054
539SIylnn5&6 18 - - 16
Bay Bridge Ply UgIvAng 586 876 - - 876
Bey Bndge PIS Pladorm 5814 11246 - 11246
r aftIm;kMPISFan Upgrade5&6 2.851 2881
Hydrogen Peroxide Truro 5&14 I.= - - 1.332
S 41 RaMatpn&Msd6 of Sewers-Newport BNd a PCH 5&6 2,679 n.955 76AU
r 53 1 amwtmcmwn a any Bridge m - 4.= 4,329
5 21RVJWOCWOImeme - 1971365 197,368
Mieallanmus Clmrym to Cloeed W.O. 286 2.8B) - 3.145
SuaTotal n4,631 421A32 - 1.195.713
•+ sm.of JMM WOAs 2,849,403 996,171 - 3,845,574
Sulk-Total 3,624,064 1417.2W 5.011,287
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT a EQUIP:
LandaM PmPvh,Rgtls 69,740 - - 69,740
Codaducm Ueesand Pump Smu, 34,173,313 - - 34.173.313
TreaMent FarJlitee 7,347 - - 7.317
Dmpael Facllmes 7115 - - 7,115
r General PmM and Admin.Fact 39.4W - - 39,402
Egldtyn Joint Tr*x mrd Fadl. 26,705,896 - 26.705.895
Omm Aeeeta M Cat Leas Amon. - - -
SYa-Total 61,002.513 - - 61.002,813
r Total Propwry,Plant A Equipment&CIP 64.826.897 1,417203 - 66.044,100
Section 4-Page 5
1997-98 Mid Year Report L
District No.6-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/97
Operating Budget Review
1997.98 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date I
Budget Date Budget %Expended YI
REVENUES:
Tee Levy(Borxl Fund(.)Only) - - - -
TmAlbcetidrWSubventidn.(Sham d1%) 1,162,000 575,908 586,OB2 49.5699
Connection Fees 45.000 10,558 34,441 23.46%
Other Fees 3,496,000 1,590.932 1.907.068 45.46%
Soo of Capacity Rights 59,000 - 59.000 -
marest&Miec.Rensiptc 1243.0W 619265 823,735 49.82%
Other - 429 1428)
Total R.wnuen 6.007,000 2,797,092 3,209,908 46.56%
OUTLAYS: Total
Share cf Jdo Works Trent Plant 2247.100 1.016,398 1230702 45.2398
District Trunk Sewer Construction 479,500 3,346 476,154 0.70%
COPSond Retfreme d and moment Expanse 1256.000 791,110 464.090 6299% 1
Shoreof Jomt Works OModmgEx,mmes 1,675.100 734.708 940.392 43.86% 6a
District Operating B Other Experoft. 215.200 93.089 122.131 43,25%
Total Outlays 5,8M.Wo 2,636.631 3234,289 44.93%
Capital Facilities Budget Review
Balance Adlustrnenb Trenslsrto Balance
7N57 &AddlBons Fixed Asaate 12/3119'7 V
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
Realign Dover Trunk Sewer 3.569 - - 3.5o)
14-1-1 A&B Gmlm Io.,14-1-2 Baker Street 79,937 - - 79,937 V
6-12Fdrveiw Rene} 359.251 502 - 359.833
6-13 Air Baca Sewere Abandonment 58,527 2,764 - 61,291
PAS Ughting&Emergency Lee Upgrade (32,915) - - (32.915)
2-37 Miscellaneous ImprovemeMe M Pump Surson. 930
532 Bklar R&Rocky Pt PS lmprov.5&6 My - - 187
5373&4 PCH Grenly San Rehab 586 2.516,700 - - 2,516,70E
539Siphon5&6 1 - - 1 L
Sklar point PS Fen Upgrade 586 960 - - 980
541 Roof &Moor.of Sangre-Newport SW&PCH 5 66 5.522 - - 5.522
Mien.Chg.W Closed Vbrk Onc er (273) - - (273)
Sub-Tool 2,9B2,4D4 - 3,346 - - - 2,995,750
Share of Joint WOM1s 3.321,731 1,016,398 - 4,338,120
SYb-Tall 6A14,135 1,019,744 - 1,333.879
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT 6 EQUIP:
Land anal Properly Rghty 58? - - 562
Collecten Urea end Pump Sire. 5,152,390 - 5,152,390 1
Treatment Fed9tren Ze53 - - 2,m J
Dispel Facilitien 7,394 - - 7.304
Gareral Plant atvl Adman.Face. 113.749 - - 113,749
Equilym Joint Treatrnent Fall. 27,114,812 - - 27,114,812
Othm Asada oCoss LessAmon - - �d
Sub-Tool 32,391,5513 - - 32.381.560
Tarot Property,Plant&Equipment CIP 39,705,695 1,019,744 W,725.439 '
uJ
Section 4 -Page 6
L'
Budget Review by District
District No. 7-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/97
_ ODeratino Budget Review
1997-98 Yam-To- Bamelning Year4o0ate
_ Budget Daft Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tau Levy(Borg Fuid(c)Only) -he 00 -
Tax (Sure 2,931, o 1,445,135 1,485,86 49.31 5 %
_ Cannec5rn Fees SO4,000 117,245 386,755 23, 6
Other Feet 6,916.000 1,373,Wl 5,542,119 10.97%
Sale of capacity Rights - 131p00 - 131,000 -
Intemat 8 Mlac.Receipts 1,879,0D0 1,=,0. MA" 54.41%
_ Dow - 24,015 (24,015) -
Total Revenant 12381,000 3,862730 8378.2]0 3722%
OUTLAYS:
Stave or Joint Wants Tmd Plant 4,985,WD 2323,557 2861,443 46.61%
DieNa Troll Sever Constememn 1,341,000 335,043 1.005.957 24.98%
COP/Band RaOemere and lmamel Eupema 2185,000 1,395.516 789.484 63.87%
Slsre of Joirt Worts Opening Ekpemes 4,124,500 2.219.075 1,905,425 W.W%
_ Diana Opemdng 8 other Eapeikinnes 1,789,000 502,277 1265.725 28.09146
Total Outlays 14,423,500 8,775,466 7A46.032 46.969%
Capital Facilities Butlaet Review
Balance Aelusts ents Tmno%,W Salto
7I1W AkIdhiune Fled Aeaeft IMIM7
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
_ 7-22 Pamllel8 Repl.tenon 14M9hls 2,093,247 - - 2,00.247
7-23.1 Cdbge Ave.Pump Sin Rapt Fo Meier 24.570 3.419 - 27,989
7.24 Manhole Awns ModRmeons 15.121 - - 15121
7-7.1 Main St.PIS hMm. 233,852 284,452 - 516.304
_ 2.37 Mlerelkrods lmprwerrema 0 Pump Slab.. 18,SB9 - - ta599
14-1.1 A 8 B GIs.Ia.14-1-2 aakm Street -
Fv4e Man DWM6.7814 44,126 - - 44,126
7-1b1-182 Rehlll Pump Station 6,867 - - 6,867
7.14 Abandon 9 P/S.7-W&2 987,767 - - 987,767
7-16 Lerlvl ltslghta Seem - - - -
TatlNe Pipe Roplacerent 2,fi63 - - 2,663
]-1T Omnge Park Apes Sewer Reel. 37.133 2,S56 - 39,689
_ 7-1-2 Gieler47edhlll Trunk RNocalion 98,093 - - 98.093
Harvard Ave.Trunk Sawa 3.074 - - 3,074
7-2%Iewar Mapping - 34.2T7 31,277
7-25 Main Street Trull Flwv - 10,339 1oW9
Miamllanaoue Chmgesto GoeeGW.O. 2,346 - - 2,348
SubTotsl 3.567,460 =.W - 3.902,503
Shamof Jaint Worts 6,707686 2.323,557 - 9.031.245
_ SutrTofel 1e275,148 2.658,600 - 12,933,748
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT B EQUIP:
Lmtl end Pmpety Rights 1,55SAAr - - 1,559,654
_ CdlepSon Linnet antl Pump Soo. 38,352.901 - - 38,352,801
Treatment Facilites - - -
DmposalFadliSas f0,782 - - 10,782
_ General Plard and Admin.Fadl. 97,805 - - 97.805
Equity in Jamt Tmament Fact 621,268,321 - - 6226B,R1
OOer Aextsm Cant less Amore 114,185 - (24,764) 89,381
Sue-Totai 102,403,529 - (24.784) 102,376.744
Total Property,Plant&E4uhanent B CIP 112.878A76 2esaitoo (24.784) 115.312.492
Section 4-Page 7
1997-98 Mid Year Report "
District No. 11 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L
6 Months Ended 12131197
Operating Budget Review
1997-98 Year-To- Remaining Year-to40ata L
Budget Data Budget %Expanded
REVENUES: II
Tax L U
Levy(Bond Fun f(s)Only) 10.000 5.399 4,601 63.99%
Tax Allocations/SuWemans(Share of l%) 2,039,0D0 1,041,485 997,515 51.08%
Connection Fees 448,000 540,668 (92.658) 120.68%
Other Fees 3,556,000 1,662,546 1,973.454 46.02%
Sete of Capacity Rights 98.000 - 98,11DD -
Intereat&Msc.Receipts 1,319,000 666.985 652,015 60.57%
Other - 573 (573) -
u
Total Revenues 7,570,01D0 3,937,656 3,632.344 52.02%
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works Tmd.Plana 3,714.200 1,711,695 2,002.505 46.09%
L
Distncl Trunk Sewer Construction 1,203,000 723,054 979,848 18.54%
COP7Bard Retirement and Interest Expense 1,887,000 1,141,942 745,058 60.52%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expemes 3,326,600 1.394,664 1,932,138 41.92%
Dialect Operating&Other EcperMitwes 780,900 304.090 476,820 38.94%
Total Outlays 10,911,9o0 4,775,435 6.136.465 43.76%
Caokal Facilities Budget Review
Selene Adj.lrnants Transfer to Balance
711197 &Additions Fixed Assets 12131167 6w
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
11-17 Slater PIS Sewage Sys Impray. 6,912,768 195,857 - 7.108,623
11-17-2 Goldenwst Tnmk Sewer Improvements 44,994 6,802 - 51,196 I
Hunttington Beach Wetlands Visitor Center 1.425 - - 1.425 LI
2.37 Miscellaneous ImprwemeMs to Pump Stations 7,129 - - 7,120
IlAll District 11 Regional - 19,961 19,951
11-18-1 AoarMmnierd d H.B. - 434 434 u
Miscellaneous Charge to Closed W.O. 773 - - 773
SuttTotal 6,966,487 223,054 - 7,189.541
Share of Joint Works 5,074,110 1.711,695 - 6,795,805 L
SulFToml 12.040,597 1,934 749 - 13,976.346
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: L
Land and Property Rights 148.9m - - 146.965
Cdlection Linea and Pump Sam. 19,048,602 - - 19,048.602 I '
Treaarront Fadlities - - - _ J
Deposal FadSEes 3,053 - - 3.053
General Plant and Admin. Facil. 30,682 - - 30,662
Equity in Jam Treatment Facil, 45,825.362 - - 45.825.352 V
Other Assets at Cost Less Amer.
Sub-Total 65,054.685 - - 65,054,685
Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 77.095.282 1,934,749 - 79,030,031 Imo'
tart
Section 4-Page 6
L
Budget Review by District
District No. 13 - Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review
6 Months Ended 12/31/97
ODeratina Budget Review
—' 1997-98 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date
Budget Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
— Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - -
Tax Allocatians/Subvendons(Share of 1%) - - -
Connection Fees 392.000 204.022 187,978 52.05%
Other Fees 824,000 330,203 493,797 40.07%
Sale of Capacity Rights 16,000 - 16,000 -
Interest&Misc.Receipts 563,000 296.672 266.128 52.73%
_ Other - - - -
Total Revenues 1,795,000 931,097 963,903 46.30%
OUTLAYS:
— Share of Joint Works Trml.Plard 594,5W 275.590 318.910 46.35%
District Trunk Seger Construction 147,000 - 147,000 0.00%
COP/Bond Retirennent and Interest Expense 19o)0 13.212 5,788 69.54%
Share of Joint Works Operating Expanses 516,100 241,343 274,757 46.76%
— District Operating&Other Expenditures 32,000 5,618 25,382 17.58%
Total Outlays 1,308,600 S35,763 T72,837 40.94%
-
Capital Facilities Budget Review
— Balance Adjustments Transfer Balance
711/97 &Additions Fixed Assets 12/31197
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
,r Shure of Joint Works 767.648 275,590 - 1,043,23B
Sub-Total 767,648 275,590 - 1,043,238
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP:
Land and Property Rights - - -
Collection ones and Pump Sins. 2.887,356 - - 2,887,356
Treatment Facilities - - - -
- Disposed Facilities - - - -
General Plant and Admin.Feel]. - - - -
Equity in Joint Trea inem Facil. 7,394,816 - - 7.394.816
.y Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. - - - -
Sub-Total 10,282,172 - - 10,282.172
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CtP 11,049,820 275,590 - 11,325.410
Section 4- Page 9
1997-98 Mid Year Report "
District No. 14-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L
6 Months Ended 12131197
Operating Budget Review -
1997-93 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date L
Budge) Date Budget %Expended
REVENUES:
Tax levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - L
Tax A locatrons/Susvendons(Share of 1%) - - - -
IRWDFees 2,300,D00 1,096,900 1,203,100 47.69%
Other Fees - 409,116 (409,116) -Sale of Capacity Rights 70,000 - 70,000 - L
Interest B Miac.Receipts 341,D00 204.989 136,011 60,11%
Other - - - I I
Tufal Revenues 2,711,000 1.711.005 999,995 63.11% u
OUTLAYS:
Share of Joint Works That.Plant 2,672,500 1.238,893 1,433,677 46.36% il
District Trunk Sewn Construction 1,700,001) 110 1,699,aw 0.01%
COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 153.000 77,723 75,2T7 50.8016
Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,787,800 638,21a 1,249,582 3D.11%
District Operating&Other Expepdaures 253,000 05,524 till 25.20% L
Total Outlays 6,566,300 1,921,466 4,644,832 29.28%
Capital Facilities Budget Review L,
Balance Adjustments Transferto Balance
711W &Addftlons Fixed Assets 12131197
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
14-1-1 A&B Gisler Ind., 141-2 Baker St.
Force Man,Districts 6,7&14 21,394 110 - 21.504
Main St.Pump Station Impmvemenls 7.7-1 214,540 - - 214,540
Main St.Flume Flowaneler 40 - - 40
Bay Bridge PIS lighting Improvements 5&14 46 - - 46
Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 5&14 70 - - 70
Bay Bridge Platform Addition (39) - (39) V
Biaeryaint PIS Fan Upgrade 5&14 609 - - Bog
Sub-TOW 236.660 110 - 236.770
V
Share of Joint Works 4,170.276 1,238,893 - 5,409.169
Sub-TOW 4,406,936 1,239.003 - 5.645,939 I I
COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: u
Land and Property Rights - - - -
Collection lines and Pump San. 25,582,099 - - 25,5&2,099
Treatment Facilities - - -
DisposalFaclllies - - -
GeneralPlanandAerin.Facil. 6.747 - - 6.747
Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 33Z3,586 - - 33,213.586
011 Assets at Cast less Amort. - - - -
Sub-Toted 58,802.432 - - 58.802,432 1 ,
Total Property,Plant&Equipment&CIP 63209,368 1.239.003 - 64,448,371 6.1
L
Section 4- Page 10
u
SECTION 5.
SELF-INSURANCE FUNDS BUDGET REVIEWS
Self Insurance Review
Public Liability Fund Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997
— Percent of
Actual Budget Remaining Actual
1997-98 Through Through 1997-98 Through Increase
Budget 12131t97 12f31197 Budget 12/31t96 (Decrease)
1. Beginning Reserves' 2.643,750 2,494,793 3.074.185 (579,392)
Revenues
_ 2. In-Lieu Premiums - - - - - -
3. Interest&Miscellaneous 133,000 56,483 42.47% 76,517 68,060 (11,577)
4. Reimbursements from Other Funds 120,000 209,726 174,77% (89,726) 108,907 100.819
S. Total Revenues 253,000 266,209 105.22% (13,209) 176,987 89.242
Expenses
6. Salaries,Wages and Benefits 4,500 - 4.500 - -
7. SeneftslClaims 90,000 241.955 268.84% (151.955) 141.955 99,990
— 8. Contractual Services 5.00D 4,262 85.24% 738 4,382 (120)
9. Legal Services 300,0W 172,532 57.51% 127.468 269.258 (96,726)
10. Professional Services 5,000 738 6.823 (2,561)
11. Supplies&Other 500 500
r
12. Sub-Total Expenses 405.000 418,749 103.39% (18,011) 422,428 (3,679)
13. Excess Loss Policy 120,000 60,936 50.78% 59,064 62,500 (1,564)
r
14. Total Expenses 525,000 479,685 91.37% 41,053 484,928 (5,243)
15. Excess Revenue(Expenses) (272,000) (213,476) 78.48% (54,262) (307,961) 94,485
— 16. Ending Reserves' 2,371,750 2.281.317 96.19% 90,433 2,766,224 (484,907)
r' -Includes$687,300 long tens receivable due from the County of Orange.
Section 5-Page 1
1997-98 Mid Year Report
Worker's Compensation Fund Budget Review
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 1997 L,
Percent
Actual of Budget Remaining Actual
1997$9 Through Through 1997-98 Through Increase
Budget 12131197 12n1197 Budget 12/31196 (pecreeee)
1. Beginning Reserves' 719,850 665,621 800.939 (135,318) L
Revenues L
2. In-Lieu Premiums 225.000 107,180 47.64% 117,820 121,154 (13.974)
3. Interest 5 Miscellaneous 45.000 14.306 31.79% 30,694 18,467 (1,937) V
4. Total Revenues 270,000 121,486 44.99% 148.514 139,621 (18,135)
Expenses
V
S. Salaries,Wages and Benefits - - - - -
6. Bensfitc/Claims 170,000 90,977 63.52% 79.023 130,472 (39,495)
61
7. Contractual Services 26.000 12,500 50.00% 12,500 12,500 B. Legal Services 5,000 - 5.000 - -
9. Professional Services 30.000 - 30,000 13,904 (13,904)
10. Supplies&Other 583 - (583) 5 578
v
11. Sub-Total Expenses 230.000 104,060 45,24% 125.940 156,881 (62,821)
12. Excess Loss Policy 40.000 10,554 26.39% 29.448 10,554 L
13. Total Expenses 270,000 114.614 42.45% 155,386 155.881 (42.267)
L.I
14. Excess Reninue(Expenses) 6,872 - AM) (17.28(1) 24,132
v
15. Ending Reserves• 719,850 672,493 93.42% (6,872) 783,679 (111.188) L'
•Includes$139,231 tong term receivable due from the County of Orange. L
N
Section 5-Page 2
L
� 1
u
J
SECTION 6.
OPERATIONAL REVIEW
U
U
I�I
U
u
u
u
u
u
Performance Objectives
GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE
General Management Administration (Division 110)
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance
-- Target Through 2"" Summary of Data
Quarter
Ensure treatment cost does $490/MGD $469/MGD Cost below Gallonage charge due to
not exceed target by end of increased flows and lower expenditures.
fiscal year
Ensure Districts meet 549 FTEs by end 542.25 A few positions remain to be filled;however,
adopted five year staling of fiscal year it is anticipated that the target will be met by
plan the end of the fiscal year.
Achieve Biochemical Oxygen 77%/68%TSS P1/P2 Plant 2 construction impacted removal
Demand(BOD)and Total 73%TSS 53%/44%BOD P1/P2 figures. See operations section for further
Suspended Solids(TSS) 49%BOD details.
removals in primary treatmen
process
Maintain 1 DO%Compliance 100% 100% Target met.
_ with Permit Compliance
Reduce Small Line Cleaning $0.2011inear foot $0.27/linearfoot Cost includes televising of 10%of lines,
costs through contracting which was not incorporated in original
projection.
Engineering Change Orders 5%or less of 2.10% Target met,
no greater than target contract
amount
Ensure Districts 80% 69%Performance Performance objectives were missed in field
Performance Objectives Performance Objectives categories as we continue to revise/define
and Workplan milestones Objectives 59%Workplan workload better. Workplan milestones were
met within targets 80%Workplan Milestones not accomplished in many areas as re-
Milestones engineering improvements in many
administrative/operational areas,especially
those related to DART, have been delayed.
Districts-Wide Not
Workplan Tasks Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
Second Quarter
145 86 48 11 Workplan milestones were not accomplished
in many areas as re-engineering
improvements in many
administrative/operational areas,especially
those related to DART,have been delayed.
Section 6- Page 1
Performance Objectives
GENERAL MANAGER'S OFFICE
General Management Administration (Division 110)
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance _
Target Through 2"d Summary of Data
Quarter
Ensure treatment cost does $490/MGD S477/MGD Cost below Gallonage charge due to
not exceed target by end of increased Bows and lower expenditures.
fiscal year
Ensure Districts meet 549 FTEs by end 542.25 A few positions remain to be filled;however,
adopted five year staffing of fiscal year it is anticipated that the target will be met by
plan the end of the fiscal year.
Achieve Biochemical Oxygen 77%/68%TSS P11P2 Plant 2 construction impacted removal
Demand(BOD)and Total 73%TSS 53%/44%BOD P1/P2 figures. See operations section for further
Suspended Solids(TSS) 49% BOD details.
removals in primary treatmen
process
Maintain 1009/6 Compliance 100% 100% Target met.
with Permit Compliance
Reduce Small Line Cleaning $0.2o/linear foot $027Ainear foot Cost includes televising of 10%of lines,
costs through contracting which was not incorporated in original
projection.
Engineering Change Orders 5%or less of 2.10% Target met.
no greater than target contract
amount
Ensure Districts 80% 69% Performance Performance objectives were missed in field
Performance Objectives Performance Objectives categories as we continue to revise/define
and Workplan milestones Objectives 59%Workplan workload better. Workplan milestones were
met within targets 80%Workplan Milestones not accomplished in many areas as re-
Milestones engineering improvements in many
administrative/operational areas,especially
those related to DART, have been delayed.
Districts-Wide Not
Workplan Tasks Complete Behind Started 'Summary of Data
Second Quarter -
145 86 48 11 Workplan milestones were not accomplished
in many areas as re-engineering
improvements in many
administrative/operational areas,especially
those related to DART,have been delayed.
Section 6-Page 1
- 1997-98 Mid Year Report
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
— Finance Administration (Division 210)
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance- - ..-
Target Through 2n°Quarter Summary of Data -
Average Annualized Rate 6% 6.3% The portfolios (long/short term and cash flow
of Return on Investments management)outperformed their respective
benchmarks. Figures based on current yield
calculations.
Average Interest Rate 4% 3.5% One-half of a percent is equivalent to
Paid on Certificate of approximately$870K annually in interest savings
Participation(COP) based on variable rate COPS that are not
Borrowing protected by a long-term interest rate exchange
agreement.
Remain at or under the $46.9 Million by $21.4 million through Expenses are being controlled well. Additionally,
net Joint Operating(J.O.) end of fiscal mid-year(46%total) new cost allocations models resulting from
year Financial Information System and the Multi.
agency benchmarking study have resulted in
some expenses transferred from the J.O. budget,
Workplan Tasks.. _; Not
Second Quarter- - Complete - Behind Started Summary of Data
18 7 11 0 Strategic Planning schedules changed
— resulting in missed/postponed tasks. 1997-98
borrowing postponed to FV 98-99. OCR cost
estimates behind awaiting Black 8 Veatch
— study. Other tasks on target.
Section 6-Page 2
Performance Objectives
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Accounting (Division 220)
Performance Objective 1997.98 Performance _
Target _ Through V Quarter - Summary of Data
Issue monthly financial 92% 0% Due to technical/administrative problems
reports within 10 working incurred during JD Edwards Financial
days Information System(FIS)wst allocation
module implementation, development of
reports in the first six months were
delayed. Problems are being addressed
and on-time performance is expected by
the fourth quarter.
Develop FIS Training 90%trained by on-going Program has been developed and training
program yearend scheduled for IT Department,Computer
Users Council,and Budget Coordinators.
Training is now underway.
Take advantage of all trade 90%of time. Implementation Stage Accounts Payable module needs to
discounts through timely interface fully with Purchasing module that
payment processing was implemented in November 1997. This
process will be accomplished in the 3rd
Quarter.
Identify 6,000 unclassified 90%+identified Implementation Stage Obtained CD-ROM listing of parcels and
parcels currently identifying those parcels
categorized as'unidentified'.
Workplan Tasks Not _
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary.of Data
10 5 5 0 Delays largely due to external factors
outside of the control of the Finance
Department including unavailability of
external auditors,approved but extended
leaves of absence,etc.
Section 6- Page 3
1997-98 Mid Year Report
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Purchasing &Warehousing (Division 230)
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Summary of Data
Target Through 2"d Quarter
Maintain cycle count 97%+Accuracy 92.5%(see Summary) 2nd Quarter cycle counting was postponed
program Rating due to Warehouse/Purchasing staffs
dedication to FIS implementation by
November 1997. Data refiects list Quarter
Performance. Accuracy lower due to FIS
implementation as articulated in list Quarter
Report.
Establish Complete by Implementation Stage Due to planned delay in Financial
contracts/purchasing'best- 1/98 Information System implementation,this
in-Gass'filing system has been delayed by approximately one
month. The Division currently has a
consultant reviewing practices.
Revise asset tagging Complete by Implementation Stage Capital asset dollar thresholds have been
procedures 3198 established but physical inventory
guidelines need to be formalized. Awaiting
hire of Storekeeper and Assistant
Storekeeper to provide resources for this
task.
Develop formal contract Complete by Revision Stage Draft developed by General Counsel and
terns and conditions 10197 returned to G.C.for re-work and further
refinement.
Develop supplier'hot line' Complete by Implementation Stage Direct-line phone system installed. Hotline
3/98 policies and procedures not yet developed
due to focus on FIS implementation.
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data-.:-rrL`✓.
9 4 3 2 Technical issues in FIS have caused a
few tasks to be postponed. FAHR
Committee requested revision of
Delegation of Authority work to be
revisited thus placing a few tasks behind
schedule.
Section 6 - Page 4
Performance Objectives
COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT
Communications (Division 310)
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance _
Target Through 2nd Quarter Summary of Data
Agenda Package 6 day turnaround 83% Agenda turnaround was delayed in November
Turnaround Time 100%of time 1997 due to pending information from General
Counsel.
Board Minute Preparation 10 day 83% Minute's turnaround was delayed in
Turnaround Time turnaround December due to two-week vacation of Board
100%of time Secretary.
Employee Satisfaction 3.0 score 2.7 A 3.0 score indicates employees are receiving
Rating(Communications the*fight amount'of information; less than
Audit) this indicates*too little'while greater than this
indicates'too much.' Communications
programs implemented within the last two
years will continue with allempts to re-
emphasize managemenNtine face-to-face
communications.
Photocopying Services 93%+ 96% Photocopying Services continues to receive
Satisfaction outstanding reviews from the customer base.
Graphics Services 95%+ 98% Graphics Services continues to receive
Satisfaction outstanding reviews from the customer base.
Visitor Tour Satisfaction 85%+ 95% Our tour guide program incorporating other
Rating Districts employees has met with success,
especially as guides become more
comfortable with their role. We continue to
exceed the benchmark for satisfaction.
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data _
8 8 0 0 All second quarter tasks completed to meet
end of year Critical Goals.
Section 6 - Page 5
1997-98 Mid Year Report
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 410)420/430')
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance
Target Through 2nd Summary of Data
Quarter
Ensure small line contract $0.25 per linear $0.27 Cost was slightly exceeded, however,this
cleaning costs do not foot cost includes televising of 10%of lines
exceed target cleaned,which was not incorporated in
original benchmark.
Ensure wrench time for 80%+wrench time 96% Target met,although such exceptional
Collections Facilities performance has resulted in a review of our
Maintenance Division data collection methods.
(pump station and line
cleaning)meets or exceeds
target
Ensure that collections 95%+spots 79% Target not met due to weather as well as
trouble spots ere cleaned on holiday,sick and personal leave time taken.
maintained on schedule schedule
Ensure wrench time for 70%+wrench time 75% Target met.
Fleet Maintenance Division
meets or exceeds target
Ensure planned/preventive 75% Planned 8 57% Preventive Research has indicated that all work going to
maintenance to corrective Preventive 43%Corrective Re-build shop is classified as corrective
maintenance ratios meets Maintenance maintenance tasks thereby lowering our
targets 25%Corrective initially anticipated benchmark. Benchmark
Maintenance will be revisited and revised next year based
on collected data.
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
3 2 1 0 Interface with ECM/Source Control on Inflow
and Infiltration strategies behind schedule.
'Note that GSA Administration, Facilities Maintenance and Collections Maintenance have been combined this
quarter for reporting purposes.
Section 6- Page 6
Performance Objectives
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 4601470/490')
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance
Target Through 2n" Summary of Data
Quarter
Meet Capital Outlay 75%+of time 78% Perf000ance objective met.
Revolving Fund(CORF)
project milestones by due
date
Maintain Computer Network 97%+ 96.1% Target was nearly met. One hour of
'Up-time' unscheduled downtime was experienced in the
laboratory.
Resolve Tier 1 help desk 80%+within 3 74% Performance is improving toward benchmark
calls days target and is an improvement over 1st Quarter
objectives. _
Resolve Tier 2 help desk 80%+within 5 80% This equals our performance objective.
calls days
Maintain an average work 100%or less 295% This performance is largely due to being short-
backlog of no greater than staffed one position during a large portion of
100%of staff time available the first half of the year. Additionally.backlogs
occur until complete familiarity is gained with
the new Help Desk software.
Ensure 80%productive 80%+ 32.3% Software difficulties prohibited accurate
time in Division 460 tracking. This issue is being addressed,
Maintain Plant SCADA 99.5% 100% Target exceeded.
Server"Up-time"
Workplan Tasks Not - —'
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data.
5 3 2 0 Pilot of electronic data system delayed.
Project J-31-3 rescheduled. Other
projects on target.
*Note that both Information Technology divisions and Plant Automation division have been combined this quarter
for reporting purposes.
Section 6-Page 7
1997-98 Mid Year Report
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
(Divisions 510/520')
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance
Target Through 2n'Quarter Summary of Data _
Number of Recruitment 48 days 61 This exceeded our benchmark due to the
Days to hire exempt complex recruitment of a Senior Engineer
position with specialization in process automation.
(private sector=46 days)
Percentage of supervisor 25% 24% Supervisor Compensation ratio remains
salaries to total does not below target and pnvate sector standard.
exceed 25%
(private sector=25%)
HR Department managed 90-100%of 45%expended through This is trending below a 50%mid-year
within budget budget mid-year. expenditure target.
Achieve 5-year staffing plan 549 FTE's by 542.25 FTE's through This is below our end-of-year target. There
projections years end quarter are,however, positions which require
filling.
-Ensure all training Gasses 70% (3.5 on 5 78%(3.9 on 5 scale) Target has been met. Training continues
are cumulatively rated style) to be consistently well rated although this
-above average' mid-year is below our FV 97 year-end
average of 81%.
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
4' 4 0 0 All second quarter tasks completed to meet
end of year Critical Goals.
'Note that Human Resources and Training Divisions have been combined for this quarters reporting purposes.
Section 6- Page 8
Performance Objectives
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Safety& Emergency Response (Division 530)
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance
Target Through V Quarter Summary of Data
Resolve Service Requests 90%of time 98% Customer Service remains a division
within 3 work days priority. This also represents a significant
improvement over last years objective of a
75%/5 day turnaround target.
Ensure Injury Incidence is 7.6 incidence 9.7 The objective is below industry standards
45%below industry rate but above our internal benchmark.
average Although 2nd Quarter performance was
very good,the mid-year results are
Impacted by higher than expected 1 st
Quarter accidents.
Lost Work Day Case 3.8 incidence 2.6 Target has been met and is significantly
Incidence Rate 50%below rate lower than established benchmark.
industry average
Workers Compensation $403 $240 Although accidents were above the internal
Cost Factor 30%below targets,the costs associated with claims
industry average remains low. Staff work closely with the
workers compensation 3rd party
administrator and the clinic to manage
accident costs and return employees back
to the job.
Workptan Tasks Not _
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
0 0 0 0 n/a
Section 6-Page 9
1997-98 Mid Year Report
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Environmental Compliance and Monitoring (Division 620(
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance
Target Through 2nd Summary of Data
Quarter
Ensure compliance 5%or less non- 0% Target met, no non-compliance incidents.
requirements are effectively compliance incidents
communicated result from ECM
failure to
communicate.
Meet Regulatory Deadlines 100%Deadlines 100%/100% All regulatory deadlines met.
and complete associated 95% Milestones
project milestones
Distribute high priority 95%Within 2 day 100% All high priority legislation distributed within
legislation information to turnaround targets. E-mail distribution has expedited
appropriate staff process.
Review biosolids 95%-of time 100% Target met.
documentation within 5
days
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data -
9 7 2 0 Position papers delayed. Other tasks on
target.
Section 6 - Page 10
Performance Objectives
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Environmental Sciences Laboratory (Division 630)
Performance Objective 1997-9B Performance
Target Through 2- Quarter Summary of Data
Complete development of 4198 Implementation Stage 75%of Project milestones are complete.
task-based performance
measures for laboratory
Develop procedures for 6/98 Implementation Stage Each section of lab has identified measures
measuring laboratory of quality.
quality;publish report by
end of fiscal year
Maintain monthly sample 90%-110%of 99% Performance target met. Data represents
analyses within'productive" target samples only five months as December data not
range taken available during reporting period.
Cross-train analyst staff to 90%of staff 92% Ahead of schedule. Target is to ensure that
complete additional trained by end at minimum 3 analysts are cross-trained and
functions FY 97/98 certified to perform one or more of the 65
laboratory analyses.
Review laboratory in- 100% Budget Control Stage Through mid year,out-sourced laboratory
source/out-source completion by costs have been reduced to 72%of last
opportunities and control 6/98 yeafs costs through the first six months.
out-sourced laboratory costs
at 75%of FV 96/97 costs
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
5 2 3 0 Research on in-sourcng/out-sourcing behind
schedule. Other tasks on target.
Section 6- Page 11
1997-98 Mid Year Report
TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Source Control (Division 640)
Performance Objective 1997.98 Performance
Target Through 2"a Quarter -Summary of Data
Develop Technical 90%of Implementation Stage Approximately 50%of the project have been
Assistance Center and milestones completed and milestones met.
complete project-related completed
milestones
Maintain field inspection 2.5 monitoring 2.65 Inspection events exceed targeted goal.
productivity events/day Note.however,that due to data collection
methods data is for 1st quarter.
Conduct enforcement 100%of time 100% Enforcement actions meet targeted goal.
actions within 30 days of
noncompliance event
Issue industrial wastewater 100%of time 100% Permit renewals meet targeted goal.
permits prior to expiration
Workplan Tasks - Not
-'Second.Quarter. Complete Behind: :Started- Summary of Data - -`
3 1 2 0 Some business-center development tasks
are slightly behind schedule.
Section 6-Page 12
Performance Objectives L
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Engineering Planning & Design (Division 720)
PerformaetFr �7998`'a- �+ 'PeAormanee� `� V
-Summa
Return construction 80%+of time 72% Performance nears internal benchmark. I
submittals by identified due L
date
Bid construction projects on 80%+of time 100% All jobs through mid-year were advertised I
established Capital and bid as scheduled. L.I
Improvement Program
schedule
I +
Meet design project 80%+of time 84% Twenty-one of twenty-five project milestones 6W
milestones have been met.
Meet 90%of project Complete by 100% Based on revised Strategic Plan schedule, V
milestones for Strategic Plan 8198 1 milestones have been met.
Respond to environmental 100%of time 100% The Districts is typically allowed WAS days
correspondence within 30 to respond to inquiries. Our initial
working days unless performance objective was 5-working days
requesting agency requires which was far too aggressive. This has been
more rapid response revised.
L
x•i• 7{..Zmxa i.. -nw#` Yea�
" rkplan-u,�kas�`� �'�- �� sue. . a �,�Not
Seeond;Guarter rComplete= .BdrLM s � - �Summary4QU a -
15 9 3 3 Tasks behind or not started are generally LJ
related to various internal administrative
improvements. These are being revised,as
appropriate. '
1 ,
IL
L
L
1 (
L
V
L
Snc6on 6-Page 13
L
1997-98 Mid Year Report
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Construction Management(Division 730)
-.. Pe om� s eaF� ,v+d8s8-+• .0 i ?ecgidhso
wa uc �„ . �'vt2m i'tlai�en`,""�eb'`eatc�rt er^4 '.�Summe "D'=a ta'su. "s+:s'
_
.xat¢ C
Target Change Order costs 5% 2.10% Change order wits are always based on
at no greater than 5%of the preceding four quarters. Targets have
r original contract amount been met and are well below FV 96197 end
(industry standard=7.25%) of year costs of 4.04
_ Achieve Beneficial 80%-within 90 50%-90 days Beneficial occupancy is always based on
Occupancy in facilities days 50%.240 days the preceding four quarters. Two jobs
within targets 40%-within 240 were completed. The target was not met
days due to lengthy change order time
extensions on one job and two jobs that
have liquidated damages requiring
resolution due to contractor inefficiencies.
�r Conduct Quality Control 10%or less 10% Target has been met based on QC
Inspections and average no inspections.
more 10%correctable
deficiencies
+`WO uninasis
r_ SerandCuartar 'Comp/ete�y- ,BehMd ' StbKedl SummaryoT:Dap � -
r 2 0 2 0 Tasks that are behind are related to
internal Administrative improvements
identified in earlier Engineering Audit.
Schedules have been adjusted.
Section 6-Page 14
L
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT L
O&M Administration(Division 810)
�..a�.+�u«t .n.F�
INarformance,ObJetltive ra199T-B8- �'rPari' onnancer x� gN
�� Target ;t,Tittough n°'4uaRer umrma rot Data
. .R. 7rn"^ 5 ..0 N+ W'YJ,.:. e'3a''F'.F .e14 ry
Ensure Operations $331/million $326/million gallons Performance objective met.
treatment cost per million gallons treated treated
gallons does not exceed
target
Ensure Total Injury 12.2 13.2 Target nearly met. Injury difficulties have
Frequency Rate 25%or (or less) been best described in the Safety Division
more below industry section. Most injuries occur in the
average Operations&Maintenance Department due L
to the nature of work.
Ensure Five-year staffing 220.25 FTEs by 226 FTEs End of 2nd Quarter FTE numbers are two L
plan figures are met end of year (2)less than first quarter FTE count. It is
anticipated by years end we will achieve
the target.
u
Wo Ia 'Taelm
SelwndiQuartar Court Bindy n ^ r.,Su cram ry-ofipa� _ y
13 9 1 3 Tasks behind schedule generally inGutle
quality performance objectives and reporting. L
As a result,schedules are being revised.
I '
u
Li
L
L
L(
L
L
Section 6-Page 15
I
tr
1997-98 Mid Year Report
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Operations & Maintenance Processing Support(Divisions 8201870)
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance
Target Through 2rd Quarter Summary of Data
Ensure utility, chemical, 90%-100% 96% On target.
hosolids and oxygen within budget (mid-year annualized)
contracts are managed
within budget
Ensure Capital Outlay 80%+of time 80% Project milestones met.
Revolving Fund(CORF)
project milestones are met
Respond to trouble- 80%+ 98% Through mid-year,response to such requests
shooting and service has well exceeded the benchmark target.
requests by established
prionty time frames
•Maintain therms kWh at .111 thermslkWh .113 lherms/kWh- Within targeted parameters.
Central Generation plants -Plant 1 Plant 1
(kilowatt hour)within .1061herms/kWh .108 thermsti-
targeted limits -Plant 2 Plant 2
•Maintain FERC efficiency 42°h or greater 58% FERC efficiency is above regulatory permit
at Central Generation requirements thus gaining favorable natural
plants within targeted limits gas transmission rates.
Workplan Tasks Not _ ''.0
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data -
11 4 4 3 Task behind relate to benchmarking and
DART efforts which are currently behind
original schedules.
*Note that both Process Support and CenGen divisions have been combined this quarter for reporting purposes.
Section 6-Page 16
L
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT L
O&M Plant Operations (Divisions 8301840)
LI
t' ^`t"�'Pelformanee Ob ectWe s 997-98 a� tk k "_ s rr ,8
''i x sTht'ou9A } ,sSIll MarytifD
Achieve Total Suspended Solids(pSS) 73%>at Plant 1 77%Plant 1 Primary basins L and M were
Removal Targets in Primary Treatment and Plant 2 68%Plant 2 taken out of service due to
Process construction at Plant 2. This, in
conjunction with less than ideal L
physicagchemical processing
lowered the Plant 2 TSS below
targeted levels. Li
Achieve Biochemical Oxygen Demand 50%>at Plant 1 53%Plant 1 See above.
(BOD)Removal Targets in Primary and Plana 2 44%Plant 2
Treatment Process l
L
Ensure overtime hours as a proportion of 25%(1 hour 14.3%Plant 1 Overtime continues to be
total leave hours taken does not exceed overtime per 4 19%Plant 2 aggressively managed. As a
targets hours leave taken) result,targets have been well
achieved.
Ensure overtime cost per total salary cost 8%of total base Data Pending Analyst conducting work
tices not exceed targets salary resigned. Data pending.
Wotltplansasb 27: k" *�+xNO,_ 1+.v
,_'s ' .Rxond Qwttx „ 1Comple r,.. ' Sffirtedl : , 8 rnary�ohData
— uo _
10 10 2 0 DART team formations behind L
schedule in process area
improvements. Other tasks on
target.
li
L
ll
L
li
L
L
Section 6- Page 17
rJ
1997-98 Mid Year Report
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
O&M Maintenance Divisions (Divisions 8501860)
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance
Target Through 2nd Summary of Data
Quarter
Ensure 47.5%Wrench 4T5% 64% Continued tracking and refinement of
Time in Mechanical productive time has improved accountability
Maintenance Division and our wrench time component.
Ensure 47.5%Wrench 47.5% 52% See above.
Time in Electrical&
Instrumentation Division
Maintain appropriate 60%Preventive 50% Preventive This process continues to be refined.
preventive to corrective 40%Corrective 50%Corrective Additions to the manual and automatic
maintenance ratios in the control valve database to accommodate
Mechanical Maintenance preventive maintenance tasks will improve
Division this ratio. Ratio has improved since last
quarter.
_ Maintain appropriate 60% Preventive 54%Preventive This process continues to be refined.
preventive to wnective 40%Corrective 46%Corrective Additions to the low voltage equipment
maintenance ratios in the database to accommodate preventive
Electrical&Instrumentation maintenance tasks will improve this ratio.
Division
Ensure 72.5%Productive 72.5% 73% Data indicates that field staff are spending 3
Field Time in Mechanical of 4 hours field hours conducting wrench
Maintenance Division work,job related travel time or pans
chasing,trouble-shooting, problem
investigation, procedure development and
database development and management.
Performance target has been met.
Ensure 72.5%Productive 72.5% 64% Refinements are still in progress.
Field Time in Electrical& Procedural improvements based on GEMs
Instrumentation Division consulting report being examined.
Workplan Tasks Not
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
13 8 5 0 DART activities delayed in some areas.
Other tasks on target.
Section 6 - Page 18
Performance Objectives
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Air Quality & Special Projects (Division 880)
Performance Objective 1997-98 Performance Through _
Target 2"d Quarter Summary of Data
%Air Quality non- 096 0% Performance objective is on target.
compliance issues due to —
failure to communicate to
field Operations
Meet air quality regulatory 100%of time 100% Performance objective is on target.
deadlines
Complete approved 80%-projects 37.5%through mid-year Projects are currently in progress and not
research projects including completed yet completed.
project planning,design and
field investigation
Workplan Tasks Not _
Second Quarter Complete Behind Started Summary of Data
5 3 2 0 One administrative improvement and one _
cost/benefit analysis behind schedule.
Other tasks on target.
Section 6-Page 19
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of Orange County, California
(714) 962-2411
mailing address:
P.O. Bog 8127
Fountain Valley, California
92728-8127
street address:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
92708-7018
CSDOC 12131197
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 held on ctcr as 19f/ewas duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices onL 199d
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
/I
Penny Kyle, S e a f each of the
Boards of Dir rs County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 & 14
of Orange County, California
BSIFona*27A