Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-01-28 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA January 22, 1998 NOTICE OF MEETING (71419622411 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS melling add,..; NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 Fcunual.Valley. CA OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 927288127 avast eaeran: 10844 Ell ie Avenue WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1998 - 7:30 P.M. Fountain Valley,CA 927087018 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member Agenda. The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation • Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will CIGea be held at the above location, time and date. Anaheim Brea Bucne Park rypre66 Fountain Valley Fullerton Huntington Beach B d e tary Irvine Le Habra Le Palma Laba Newportrt Beach e Beech Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings ch Orange Placenta Same Ana Seal Beach Stanton STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday. January 28, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. 7uetin One Perk Yarba Linda STRATEGIC PLAN REVIEW - Wednesday, January 28. 1998 at 5:30 p.m. County of orange NEW BOARD MEMBER ORIEINTATION - Saturday,January 31, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. 9anlbry D16tricto OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND Centel Mesa TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 4, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Barden Breve Midway City PLANNING, DESIGN AND Water olatricte CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, February 5, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Irvine Bench FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 11, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 25, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. A Public Wastewater and Erwronmentel Management Agency Camm2ted to Protecting the Environment an. 1954 JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Joint Board Meeting February February 25, 1998 March March 25, 1998 April April 22, 1998 May May 27, 1998 June June 24, 1998 July July 22, 1998 August August 26, 1998 September September 23, 1998 October October 28, 1998 November November 18, 1998 December December 16, 1998 January January 27, 1999 February February 24, 1999 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 1998-7:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received asset forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. a. DISTRICTS 2, 3. 11 & 13 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Agency District Active Director Alternate Director Brea 2, 3 & 13 Burnie Dunlap Glenn G. Parker Fountain Valley 2 &3 John Collins Laurann Cook' Fullerton 2 &3 Don Bankhead' Jan Flory Huntington Beach 3 Shirley Dettloff* Tom Harman 3 &11 Dave Sullivan Tom Hannan Los Alamitos 3 Charles E. Sylvia Ronald Bates' Midway City Sanitary District 3 Margie L. Rice James V. Evans Placentia 2 Norman Z. Eckenrode' Constance Underhill Villa Park 2 Barry Denes Richard A. Freschi' Yorba Linda 2 & 13 John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner' ov28/98 Page 2 of 2 3. b. DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Dorothy Rush of the City of La Habra from the Boards of Directors of District Nos. 2 and 3, and seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows: District Active Director Alternate Director 2 &3 Steve Anderson John Holmberg C. DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Gerald Sigler of the City of Buena Park from the Board of Directors of District No. 3, and seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows: Active Director Alternate Director Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller d. DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor David J. Shawver of the City of Stanton from the Board of Directors of District No. 3, and seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows: Active Director Alternate Director Brian Donahue Harty M. Dotson e. Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any 4. a. DISTRICT 13— Election of Chair pro tem b. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary K: pall genda\1998 Jo 8mrd Agen mO12898wppagenda.d= AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 1998-7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion j and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 01/28198 Page 2 of 6 6. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Joint Chair: consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 December 17, 1997 District 2 December 17, 1997 District 3 December 17, 1997 District 5 December 17 1997 District 6 December 17, 1997 District 7 December 17, 1997 District 11 December 17, 1997 District 13 December 17, 1997 District 14 December 17, 1997 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS 11/12/97 11/26/97 Joint Operating Fund $1,285,072.00 $2,608,196.69 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 147,119.96 3,185,772.58 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 26,043.09 District No. 1 0.00 0.00 District No. 2 6,311.14 1,625.63 District No. 3 0.00 8,715.00 District No. 5 0.00 0.00 District No. 6 0.00 3,445.43 District No. 7 6,162.22 35.00 District No. 11 0.00 41,374.16 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 0.00 TOTALS $1 444,665 32 $5 875 208 58 01/28/98 Page 3 of 6 CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEM NOS. 9 - 11) All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All Items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 9. Adopt State Office of Emergency Services Resolution for the purpose of obtaining federal and/or state financial assistance in connection with winter storm of December 6, 1997. 10. Reaffirm the Districts' prior commitment to maintain all the terms and conditions of all the current agreements among County Sanitation District 14, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the Irvine Ranch Water District; and authorize the Joint Chairman to transmit a letter regarding the CSDOC consolidation commitment to the Irvine Ranch Water District. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3 & 11 11. a. Approve Inter-Dishict Loan Agreement for Capital Facilities between District Nos. 1 and 2 in the amount of$6,300,000.00; and b. Approve Inter-District Loan Agreement for Capital Facilities between District Nos. 3 and 11 in the amount of$4,000,000.00. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 12. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 01/28/98 Page 4 of 6 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re January 28, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 17, 1997 to be filed. C. Approve name change from the "County Sanitation Districts of Orange County"to the "Orange County Sanitation District"to coincide with the July 1, 1998 consolidation date. 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan re December 18, 1997 meeting. b. AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the meeting held on December 18, 1997 to be filed. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re January 21, 1998 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 21, 1998 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of December 1997. d. ITEM DELETED e. Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 135, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees as Authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04, 1. Verbal report of General Counsel 2. Motion to read Ordinance No. 135 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). 3. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. 135. 4. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 135 01/28/98 Page 5 of 6 ALL DISTRICTS— (Continued from page 4) 15. f. ITEM DELETED g. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc., for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-3, to provide additional planning and design services in the amount of$397,239, for a total amount not to exceed$1.085,749; and, extend the contract duration for an additional six months to April 1999. h. Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications, and authorize award of a contract for Replacement of Construction Management Trailers at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-70, to Space Leasing Company, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $183,989. DISTRICT 5 16. Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications, and authorize award of a contract for Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, to Jerrold Corporation in the total amount of$29,813.00. 17. ALL DISTRICTS CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chair may convene the Boards in dosed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Govemment Code Sections 54956,8, 54956.9. 54957 or 54957.6, as noted, Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted dosed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Boards take final actions on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 01/28/98 Page 6 of 6 ALL DISTRICTS— (Continued from page 5) 17. a. 1. Confer with General Counsel re consideration of initiation of possible litigation, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v. PennWilson CNG (Government Code Section 54956.9(c)). 2. Confer with General Counsel re Frank Chavez v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Workers Compensation Appeals Board Case No. LB00283418 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a)). b. Reconvene in regular session c. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 18. Matters that a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 19. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 20. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 21. Adjournments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the dose of business 14 days '.. preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or (714)962-2411, ext. 7130 '.. H 1wp dta\admin\9SWgenda\912898.doc MEE IND DATE: 01/28/98 TIME: 7:30 p.m. DNiTRICTS: 1, 2, 3, 5,8. 7. 11, 13& 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS ILUT21 ...................... ....MC OUIDAN ...J/ IHOLMUR01.. ... ...... .ANDERSON................... ✓ — IPERRYI...... .._FERRYMAN .. . ._. / 1 )......... ...........SANKHEAD................... _ (COONT21... .....MURMY ._. OEYES)...........................BROADWATER.............. _ IMTTSI.......... ....SALTARELLI.................. DOMYTIEI.....................BROVM...................... _ ISTEINERL...._.................5%TZER....................... ICOOKL...........................IbLLMS....................... — WOYESI..........................DEBAY......................... — DISTRICT 2 (MSCHO........................DEMSS.......................... IMMMILLI....................EMENRODE.................. IHARMAN).......................DETTLOFF..................... — (COON17)........................MURMY....................... IDOTSONI........................DONAHM................ — IHOLMBERO)--...............ANDERsoN................... IPARKERI.........................DUNUP....................... — 1 I...........................BANSHEAO.................,. (UNDERHILL)....................ECKENRODE.................. (LEYES)...........................BROADWAT:fl.............. IPERRYI...........................FEMYMAN...................� (COON............................COLLMB....................... Iw NER1.........................OULLOSON.................. _ IRIESLNO........................MES......................... JCAAROLU.......................JOKES.......................... — (PARKER).........................DUNIAP....................... (BROADWATER)...............LEYES............ mIBNER).........................SULttlIBON.................. IMAULLER)......................WROMM................... — ILUTM.............................MCOUISAN................... ILUTZI.............................AICOUMAN.................. — ISTEINERI........................ST2ER....................... (WALKER)........................MINOR BRADFORD......... — IDALn............................SEMEL.......................... ICOONTZI........................NILOUW............... ........ — WESAn..........................NOYES......................... _ DISTRICTS IEVANSI..........................RICE............................. ✓ — IEVANSI..........................RICE............................ (MMI...........................SALTARELLI..................7 IWAMERI........................MMEIIBMDFORD......... IHAMMONDI..................MIW�....................... — IHOLMBER01....................ANDERBON................... SUMER).........................BPIIZFR....................... _ 1 I............................BANKHEAD................... (SP ERI........................STEMEA........................JG — — (FORSYTHE).-..................BROW N........................ IHARIMNI.......................SULLIVAN.....................JG ICOOK)..............I.............COLLINS....................... IMILLERI..........................SWAN.......................... — IDOTSONI........................DONAHUE..................... IBATESI...........................SYLVIA................... _ IPAAKER)..................4......DUNUP....................... IDALYI............................ZEMEL...................... .... — (CARROLU.......................JONES.......................... — IBIIOADWATEPo...............LEYEe.......................... STAFF iMAIXL Q......................MARSNALL................... — wm)-........................... MCOUIOAN................... L/'�Z I' u/(STEMDN........................BPR2ER....................... ANDERSON...................... Ol�'�M MARNULNI.......................WLLNAN..................... DAHL.............................. O (BATES)...........................SYLVN...................... ..y NODOE6..........................SIC - /V/r� (DALY)............................2E1WEL..........................� — KYLE............................... /�1M LUDWM.......................... DISTRICTSMCINTYRE....................... �7�W INOYESI..........................DEBAY......................... ✓ OOTEN........ .................... 1S B Rj NUMBS......................... sTREEO.....::::::::::::: ::::::: 15PD2ER1........................BIEMER.......................� DISTRICT S WHEATLEY...................... (PERRY)...........................FERRYIMN..................�I .............I........................ — ywnn� IsPRZFAI........................Sn.ER...................... ......................................— y p MOYEs)..........................DEMY.........................— ......................................- - - ..............................- pp. .T DISTRICT 7 IMTTSI...........................SALTAMW........... .......yL _ IHAMMONDI.....................SIMS..........................�G WOODRUFF.....................JC INOYESI...........4..............DEBAY......................... . ARMKIS.......................... — IPERRVI...........................PEMVMAN...................JG KNOPF.............................JG MUTZ).............................610GUIGAN................. LEE.................................— I000NTZI........................"MY................. LINDSTROM..................... lsPERI........................ST ER................. NIXON............................. — SH A W............................._ DISTRICT 11 STONE............................ (HARMANI.......................SETTOFF..................... — ISMNERII.......................6 R..AN..................... ISiEINERI........................BPOZER....................... DISTRICT 13 (PARKER).........................OUNUP.......................� DYMNERI.........................OULMSON..................g� 15PRZEIO........................81EMER......................... (COONT21.............4..........MURAW....................... I — WA Ln............................Z9MEt.......................... DISTRICT 14 MAMMONDI..................n 0111.......................... F� (MMI...........................SALTARELLI................... _ ICOONTZI........................WIMW.-.................... � — ISP ERI........................STEINER....................... _ IMILLERI..........................SWAN.......................... — \bW—Betel%wP.dtnlndminlOSIDIRECTOROimcton Roll CHLdoc.W 01/28198 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on u 199f was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on a'EYdffn..L as . I Rf IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this -1.�dday of 19 ! Penny Kyle, Sec&tary/dfjeach of the Boards of Directors of rdbunty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California BSIFmmtlFDA 41: IwW OPN6t Of WOODRUFF, SPRADLW & SMART A MIR IOM.M.COR 014 'b1 SOUTH PAARER SrREFT,SUmi TDW ORANGE,CA 93S6S M F/14)531] FAX(714)UJ TTV DIRECT Dl (714)5662605 DIRECT FAE(714)5 25 January 6, 1998 VIA MESSENGER Mr. J.B. Richter Chairman, Chief Executive Officer & President PennWilson CNG 12118 South Bloomfield Santa Fe Springs, Ca. 90670 Re: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Purchase Order No 60057 Specification No E-265 Dear Mr. Richter: Having not had even the courtesy of a reply to my previous letter to you dated December 16, 1997, setting forth the demands of my client that PennWilson CNG immediately make arrangements for the shipment of that certain Skid Mounted Compressor manufactured by your firm and which is ready for delivery and installation, my client has directed this office to undertake several measures in order to perfect their legal position and enforce their legal rights. In the course of preparing to do this, we have discovered a great deal of information concerning the recent activities of PennWilson CNG, and as a last effort to resolve this matter on a high-class, business approach, I thought it important to set forth to you those items which the Sanitation Districts consider to be extremely important. As we know, the equipment has been manufactured pursuant to the above- referenced Purchase Order and the incorporated contract documents. We have proof that all of the manufacturing processes and the records of your firm reflect that the Compressor, which is located on your site in Santa Fe Springs, identifies this piece of equipment has having been manufactured specifically for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. We have learned that representatives of PennWilson are asserting that they have no contractual obligation to deliver except on a schedule of their own choosing. I want to assure you that as the Sanitation Districts' Legal Counsel, we have carefully reviewed this, and there is voluminous documentation in the form of correspondence, .YC M' •MMT E BLT140•M,WISB_'flnl[ BkTIY C.RURf1ETi•GM E Ch A.WW O O.FAPRPl.710N•RWF ILRIX %1ffiNW Wm1TH RLL91.KPI(t6W0IX IMiEIERPEY•I WN MTW-W -SIFT@!M.MIM•TROMM F.. lA4W ERESlIIX IOId0.91.FW RpNMD0.SMARI.AL ONlE1.9FN� ON It SMdIN•N 0.WATIS•TROMb L MO L77 Mr. J.B. Richter January 6, 1998 Page 2 memoranda and other written materials, that establish in fact, a promise on the part of PennWilson to ship upon completion. The willful and intentional failure to do so at this time should make the proof of that, if necessary in a court of law, a rather simple task. We have also been advised by the Chief Operating Officer of your Firm, in a conversation with the Districts' Director of General Services Administration, that the apparent intent and plan of PennWilson is to sell this to another buyer because of the opportunity to perhaps realize an additional $80,000.00 purchase price. I can only conclude that that is a sum of money that will be lost many times over if the breach of this contract that has been made by PennWilson is not immediately cured. If the prospect of a mere $80,000.00 additional revenue is the driving force, I would suggest that that is a very poor business choice, for the Sanitation Districts have been and will continue to be incurring considerable damages that will far exceed that, including our having to terminate the existing contract with our on-site installation contractor, Airpol, and to award a new contract at such time as a Compressor becomes available for installation. Additionally, we have outstanding obligations to Pima Gro, who has now completed conversion of its trucks for fueling based upon the Sanitation Districts' representation of availability of compressed natural gas for fueling. We also have absolute agreements with the South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD'), the relevant regulatory agency in Southern California, for the conduct of this business. Apart from the fact that your Firm, in the course of engaging in this business, will have frequent dealings with SCAQMD, which has been a financial contributor to this overall program being carried out by the Districts. We stand a sizeable risk of forfeiting the financial participation by SCAQMD if we are unable to have the system operational within the next few weeks. As noted above, my client has directed me to undertake any and all measures necessary to enforce our legal rights. First, it is our intention to immediately file litigation in the Superior Court of the State of California and will in fact attempt to even seek restraining orders or injunctive relief, as well as speck performance and damages, on the basis that the equipment has been custom designed and manufactured for my client, and we will suffer irreparable damages in the event we are unable to have this particular unit of equipment delivered and installed forthwith. Even in the absence of obtaining injunctive relief, the continued delay of many months will, of course, cause us to incur, as noted, considerable financial damages which we will seek. -4 Mr. J.B. Richter January 6, 1998 Page 3 1 want to assure you that the Sanitation Districts have a long-standing, excellent record of business transactions with our thousands of vendors and contractors over many years. The Districts typically award more than $50 million in contracts each fiscal year, and in the more than 2 decades that we have represented them, the Districts have been engaged in business litigation only 2 or 3 times. Our client's reputation is one of accommodation, but at the same time, when encountering willful and intentional misconduct by our vendors or contractors, it takes a very strong position of enforcement. For the benefit of yourself and perhaps your Legal Counsel, I would refer you to our most recent business transaction that the Districts were compelled to litigate which resulted in an award being made in Superior Court of$6.4 million in punitive damages against United Technologies Corporation because of its willful and intentional misrepresentation and fraud relating to the Districts' purchase of materials pursuant to contract. The fads in the United Technolocies case, as they relate to the actions to date by PennWilson, are remarkably similar, and the willful and intentional breach will afford the Sanitation Districts the opportunity to seek that redress. Secondly, I have just recently completed a review of the quarterly report filed by Penn Octane Corporation, pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities & Exchange Act of 1934, for the quarterly period ended October 31, 1997 and filed on December 15, 1997. The Form 10-QSB makes several references therein, specifically to this sale and purchase contract between Penn Octane/PennWilson-CNG and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, and is clearly a significant item of concern with regards to transactions and the financial status of both the parent and subsidiary corporations. I will be immediately filing a request with the SEC to provide supplemental data and to be asking for the opportunity to have a full investigation concerning the accuracy and truthfulness of the representations set forth in that report. In recognition of the filing date of December 15, 1997, which was subsequent to the action on the part of your Firm to refuse to ship the Compressor, clearly indicates an intentional misrepresentation in that mandatory filing form. Additionally, if our investigation confines that the equipment may in fact be shipped out of the United States to a foreign location, it is our intention to seek intervention by the United States Trade Commission and other federal regulatory authorities regarding any export licenses so as to bar the movement of that equipment until it ran be resolved, as necessary, in a court of law, or by mutual agreement of the parties. Mr. J.B. Richter January 6, 1998 Page 4 In summary, I must indicate to you that my client is simply outraged at the lack of honest and forthright action on the part of your Finn, and accordingly, intends to fully carry forth every possible means of redress to enforce their rights and to minimize their damages. At the same time, I want to assure you that if arrangements can be made for the immediate shipment from the Santa Fe Springs facility of the Districts' Compressor to the Districts' site, so as to allow their contractor to proceed with the installation prior to their having to terminate his contract next week, all of the enforcement actions can be avoided. I urge that you give this your most serious consideration and to advise me directly by return mail or telephone. Very truly yours, WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART m� T OMAS L. WOODRUFF ENERALCOUNSEL - CSDOC nwPI cc: Boards of Directors General Manager Director of General Services Administration Contracts Administrator d' I.AY'OF}1CPSOF d WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PlOFF8410NALCORPoMTON . MI SOUTH PARKER STREET,SUM 7D K ORANGE,CA T-R 720•(714)M7000 FAX(714)10i7 DIRECT DIAL(714)5 0.2,K* DIRECT FAX(714)S 2$Xi January 9, 1998 United States Securities & Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549 Attention: Report Filing Division Re: Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of Security Exchange Act of 1934 (Form ID-QSB) Registrant: Penn Octane Corporation Registrant's Address: 900 Veterans Blvd., Suite 240 Redwood City, California 94063 IRS Employer Id. No. 52-1790357 Quarterly Period Ending: October 31, 1997 SEC FILE NO.: 000-24394 FILM NO. 97738728 Gentlemen: Please be advised this office represents the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California("Districts"), a governmental agency formed and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of California. The Districts are party to a significant agreement with the Registrant, Penn Octane Corporation, and its subsidiary, Penn Wilson CNG. A review of the Quarterly Report referenced above reflects several specific references to the subject agreement, and we wish to provide information to the Commission and in turn a request to receive notice of further proceedings. The above-referenced Quarterly Report indicates that on October 21, 1997, the Registrant Company announced the contemplated filing of a Registration Statement with the Commission for the sale to the public of additional shares of its common stock. In recognition of this, Districts believe it important to bring to the attention of the Commission a major issue on the contract, in recognition of the fact that it is specifically referenced in the Quarterly Report. [Reference Part 1, Item 2] The Districts have paid all monies due under the terms of the Purchase Agreement (total purchase price of$251,494.97). Actual payments to date are in the amount of$176,046.48. The balance, pursuant to the terms of the contract, is due upon delivery and acceptance of the equipment subject to the Purchase Agreement. TERRY C.A V$•.E RMNL'O•M.14L4ROBEH•REm C.RIAUER•IOHN E GVA n1:GH OWOO.FMRIF'GION•RUDF R.. IOSEAI W.FORBM -q '.1CRK MGEA•WM E IEFFREY MnGDA UJNA-WIAT-WnT%L M.MAPS"..AS F..IXM IAS(IN E.ROWM•MMK.RUW•KE T'NNR.SMART.M.•DAMEI.RFL 0 DAUFLK.SFWUN•A N R.WATR•MIOMAR L M MIFF 6 Securities & Exchange Commission January 9, 1998 Page 2 The Quarterly Report makes reference to the fact that PennWilson CNG/Penn Octane obtained a Letter of Credit guaranteeing performance,which Letter expired November 26, 1997. Said Districts allowed said Letter to expire based on the actual representation by Registrant Company that the equipment was being shipped to the contract delivery site. The equipment manufacture has been completed, and the equipment is specifically designed for and has been identified physically and by all documentary records as equipment for Districts, pursuant to said Agreement. Immediately following the release of the Letter of Credit, Registrant Company refused to ship the equipment, which is presently in shipping containers located on the Registrant Company's property in Los Angeles County, California. There are no contractual disputes over payment of any sums, and the Districts have performed all terms and conditions of the Agreement, and no claims to the contrary have been asserted by Registrant Company. Due.to the willful and intentional breach of the contract and the misrepresentation and possible fraud on the part of Registrant Company, and its subsidiary, and its officers and employees, Districts intend to file suit in the Superior Court for the State of California at the earliest possible date, and in no event later than January 16, 1998, seeking damages and specific performance. It is the opinion of the Districts that the above-referenced Quarterly Report Form 140SB is a willful misrepresentation, in that it was filed December 15, 1997, 6 days following a December 9, 1997 letter signed by Mr. John Weber, President and Chief Operating Officer of PennWilson CNG, advising that the equipment manufactured for Districts was being used to satisfy another customer's needs (i.e., resold to another customer) and would not be shipped to the Districts, notwithstanding that all scheduled payments have been timely made by Districts. There is no evidence of production of new equipment to satisfy the terms of the Purchase Agreement. We believe that the Vice-President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Ian T. Bothwell, knowingly signed the above-referenced Form 10-QSB, which referenced the sale and scheduled delivery of the equipment pursuant to the contract to Districts, notwithstanding his personal knowledge that the Registrant Company was intentionally breaching its contract, retaining the revenues paid by Districts, and willfully refusing to deliver the purchased equipment without cause. This information is provided to the Commission as an extraordinary case, in recognition of the fact that Registrant Company has proposed the issuance of stock based upon the 1997 corporate activities of forming Wilson Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; Penn CNG Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; and the organization of its wholly-owned subsidiary PennWilson CNG, and based upon the Quartedy Report which places particular emphasis on the fact that the Company was awarded 2 contracts, 1 of which is with the Districts, as referenced 5 i Securities & Exchange Commission January 9, 1998 Page 3 above. They have indicated no success in entering into any additional CNG contracts, and in recognition of contemplated litigation and contract disputes, the Quarterly Report may not be an accurate reflection of the financial condition and results of operation. On behalf of the Districts, we would request that the Commission make inquiry into the accuracy and validity of the information supplied by the Registrant Company in the above- referenced report, to take all measures to insure that any proposed issuance of stock to the public is based solely upon full, complete, accurate and truthful information. Districts further request that they be given notice of any actions taken by the Commission, including requests for information, and Districts will agree to cooperate and supply any information requested by the Commission. Very truly yours, WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART CCu ' OMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL- CSDOC nwq cc: County Sanitation Districts Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts General Manager Mr. J.B. Richter, Chairman/CEO, Penn Wilson CNG (Texas) Mr. John Weber, Vice President/COO, Penn Wilson CNG (Santa Fe Springs) Mr. Ian Bothwell, Vice President/CFO, Penn Octane (Redwood City) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r January 21, 1998 phone: (7141962-2411 mailing address: To the Chair and Members RD.Bo.8127 of the Joint Boards of Directors F Untaln Valley.CA 5272ea127 Subject: Board Letter street addhae.: 10644 Boa Avenue R°"92w0-7'G4 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional s2]o6-]CCA 9 Y Y 9 information on any of the items, please call me. Districts Qualifies for the AMSA Gold Award Memher Aenc"e I am pleased to inform you that, because of the excellent work by all staff, the 0 Districts did not experience a single treatment plant permit violation during 1997. In Cities recognition of this accomplishment, the Districts has qualified for an Association of Anahaim Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) Gold Award for 1997. AMSA is the Brea national organization that represents the interest of the country's wastewater Buena Park treatment agencies. AMSA member agencies serve the majority of the sewered Cyprass population in the United Slates that collectively treat and reclaim more than 17 billion Fountain ✓alley wllarton gallons of wastewater each day. Huntington Beach IfVlna La Ha For the past 11 years, AMSA has recognized member agencies that demonstrate a La Palms high level of performance in meeting NPDES permit requirements. We anticipate that Los Alamitos the Gold Award will be presented to the Districts during AMSA's Annual Meeting in Hewpof< raach nge Jul at Colorado Springs, Colorado. Shorn thereafter we will receive a certificate that Orange YY Placentia we will display. Sane Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tuavh SCCWRP Open House Ville Park mrna ands Many Board members may be familiar with the Southern California Coastal Water County of Drange Research Project (known as SCCWRP, pronounced "squirp"), a joint powers authority created by the four largest Southern California wastewater treatment plant operators, sanitary Districts including the Districts. SCCWRP conducts research on all aspects of the impacts on the health of the Southern California marine environment, with special attention to the Costa Mesa impacts of discharges from wastewater treatment plants. On February 12, beginning Garoen Grave P 9 P ry 9 9 Midway city at 3:30 p.m., SCCWRP will be hosting an Open House at its offices and research facilities in Westminster. A copy of the announcement and directions are attached to Water Districts this letter. You are welcome to attend. Contact Nancy Wheatley for details. Irvine Ranch A Public Wastewater and Enviranmentsl Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 7954 Members of the Boards of Directors Page 2 January 21, 1998 Sewer Service Rates Stabilize Accordino to 1997 AMSA Index When compared to this year's 2.4% change in the Consumer Price Index, the 2.1% increase in residential sewer service rates reflected by the 1997 AMSA Index is good news for ratepayers. The AMSA Index is an annual survey of average residential service charges prepared by the Association's Financing and Management Committee. It reflects the responses of AMSA member agencies in each region of the United States. The 1997 AMSA Index of 208.2 is based on the responses of 154 agencies. Of these agencies, 146 also provided data for 1996. These 146 responses were used to calculate the population-weighted service charge increase for residential users nationwide of 2.1%from 1996 to 1997. Overall, 88% of AMSA member agencies participated in the latest survey. Update on Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR) IN Pickler, Chairman of the Joint GWR Cooperative Committee, sent letters to Orange County's mayors, city councils and representatives in Sacramento, introducing the GWR project. I am attaching a copy of one of the letters, in the event you haven't seen it. If you have questions on the project, you can contact Tom Dawes at the OCWD, or Jim Herberg, our staff representative, at 714/593-7310. Update on Orange County Bankruptcy Activities Attached is a faxed letter dated January 13, 1998 updating ongoing activities regarding settlement funds. Blake Anderson is our representative, and you can contact him at 71 415 93-71 1 0 if you have questions. Consolidation Update We are on schedule for a July 1 consolidation date. The County Board of Supervisors, at their January 13 meeting, adopted a resolution determining that 100 percent of property tax revenues be distributed to a consolidated Sanitation District. This tax exchange issue was a consent calendar item. The Districts' consolidation will be heard by LAFCO during their February 11 meeting. We anticipate that our application for consolidation will be approved by LAFCO and forwarded to the Board of Supervisors, who act as the Conducting Authority, for the protest hearing. That hearing will be held in late March/early April. Included in your agenda packet today is a letter to the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) reaffirming the Districts' commitment to continuing our contractual agreements with that agency. This letter was requested by IRWD during a meeting with Districts' staff earlier this month. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 3 January 21, 1998 December CALTrans Shootinas You will recall that a former CALTrans employee opened fire in a CALTrans maintenance yard in December killing four people. The gunman, Arturo Reyes Tortes, who was killed at the scene by police, had been an employee of the Districts from December 1-11. 1997. He worked in the Collection Facilities Operations and Maintenance Division, but was let go as he did not meet the physical requirements of the job. Manhole Pluaaina and Sealina Program In an effort to prevent surface water infiltration, the Districts has supplied manhole plugs and seals to Brea. Fountain valley, Newport Beach and Yorba Linda. Staff will be evaluating storm Bows to study the effects. If any Director is interested in taking part in this program, please call Nick Arhontes at 714/593-7210, or have your Director of Public Works contact Nick. Filming on Districts' Property Several film studios have, in the past, used Districts' property for commercials, advertising, and films. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, is responsible for negotiating these agreements. In December, Triage Entertainment indicated an interest in using the hallways in the laboratory for a one-day shoot; however, due to conflicts with their personnel it did not take place. I'm including this information as an indication of just one of the revenue opportunities that exist for the Districts. There is no predetermined daily rate for leasing our facilities; each request is considered separately. 1997-98 Budget receives GFOA Award The Districts' has been advised that we have received the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for Fiscal Year 1997-98 from the Government Finance Officers Association. According to GFOA, this award is the highest form of recognition in govemmental budgeting, and its attainment represents a significant achievement by our organization. One budget reviewer noted that the section on Division budgets was very informative and very well put together, and that the performance objectives, measures, and results were outstanding. Staff members directly involved in this effort are: Gary Streed, Mike White, Dan Dillon, Laurie Arnold, and Danny Evangelista. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 4 January 21, 1998 Focus on A Season of Change I have included a copy of a presentation given by John R. Wodraska, General Manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, that discusses changes in the future of Southern California water policies. I think you will find it very informative. Orange County Litigation Fund Enclosed are several pages from the Orange County Litigation Fund, Combined Financial Statements report dated June 30, 1997, which was prepared by Wright Ford Browning & Young, Certified Public Accountants and Consultants, Inc., an independent auditor for the County of Orange. This information provides a good outline of the bankruptcy and litigation issues. Thanks from the OC COG As some of you may know, OC COG has been using the Board Room for their monthly meetings. Enclosed is a letter of appreciation Laurann Cook, Chair of OC COG and Mayor of Fountain Valley, Odor Complaints Two Plant No. 1 odor complaints were received on December 31 and January 8. Both complaints were from residents of Fountain Valley, living close to Ward Street. As a routine, staff checked odor sources around complainants' residences, performed the odor rounds within the plant, checked wind direction, influent treatment and scrubber processes conditions. Results of the investigation indicated: • Staff could not smell sewage at either residence • Odor rounds showed normal readings • The wind was blowing in the direction of the residences • Influent treatment and scrubber operations were normal Field staff determined that the treatment plant was not the odor source. Odors could have come from the Districts, as well as the Orange County Water District or the nursery at Garfield and Ward. Since the wind was blowing across the plant and toward the residences, it was impossible to identify the odor source. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 5 January 21, 1998 Recent Publications of Interest Enclosed are recently published articles of issues that affect the Districts that you may not have seen. If you wo Id Jikitia/l�pfortnation on any of the above items, please call me. Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt H1WP.nrAwauHwnmr ARo.Lmarzeue.00c Attachments: SCCWRP Open House Announcement Copy of Iry Pickier's letters introducing Groundwater Replenishment System Project January 13, 1998 letter re OCIP Settlement Funds Focus on A Season of Change by John Wodraska, MWDSC Excerpt from Orange County Litigation Fund, Combined Financial Statements December 11, 1997 letter from OC COG Chair Laurann Cook Recently Published Articles Please join Southern California Coastal Water Research Project at our OPEN HOUSE Thursday, February 12, 1998 3:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. 7171 Fenwick Lane, Westminster, CA (map on reverse side) A unique opportunity to learn about our work Speakers Tours Demonstrations For further information call us at (714) 894-2222 or visit our web site at www.sccwrp.org Directions to Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 7171I Fenwick Lane, Westminster, CA (714) 894-2222 m see a' m Ok Fenwick Lane m 90/ > 'ro io 3 S'Jf m t m ^eg U 0 C9 Bolsa Ave. Traveling southbound on the San Diego (405) freeway Exit at Bolsa Ave. Turn left at Chestnut(the first light) Turn left at Fenwick (one block north of Bolsa) SCCWRP is the first building on the right Traveling northbound on the San Diego (405) freeway Exit at Beach Blvd. Proceed north on Beach Turn left at Bolsa(appx. 1-1/2 mi.) Turn right at Chestnut(appx. 1 mi.) Turn left at Fenwick (one block north of Bolsa) SCCWRP is the first building on the right Groundwater Replenishment System December 31, 1997 The Honorable Ross Johnson California State Senator 18552 MacArthur Blvd., #395 Irvine, CA 92715 Dear Senator Johnson: I am writing to encourage your support of an exciting and much needed water reclamation project that will provide over 100,000 acre feet of new water to the Orange County area each year, enough water to satisfy the needs of over 200,000 families. I head a joint committee of the directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the Orange County Water District who are sponsoring the Groundwater Replenishment System. If implemented, the Groundwater Replenishment System would be the largest water reclamation project In the nation. As you know, Southern California is dependent on an increasingly less reliable and high-priced imported water supply. With significant population increases facing us in the next twenty years, we will have even greater demands placed on our limited local water supplies. Unfortunately, there are few new water sources available, especially in Southern Califomia. Agricultural water transfers are difficult to achieve, desalination is too costly, and the CalFed process is not likely to result in significant new water supplies for the Southland. The most cost effective means to deal with increased water needs is through water reclamation augmented by conservation. The Groundwater Replenishment System will have multiple benefits for the Orange County area. It will take highly treated wastewater now sent to the ocean and treat it through reverse osmosis and microfiltration to standards that will exceed all drinking water requirements. Some of the water will then be naturally percolated into the Orange County's large underground water basin where it will actually improve the quality of our groundwater by reducing salinity and total dissolved solids (TDS). This new high-quality water will then be available for the growing number of future residents and businesses. The rest of the water will be used for irrigation, industrial use, and for protecting the basin from salt water intrusion. I believe the Groundwater Replenishment System can provide an exceptionally high-quality new water at a cost that is comparable to, or less expensive than future imported water. If you or your staff would like additional information, a special briefing, or a tour of our Groundwater Replenishment System advanced technology facilities in Fountain Valley, California, please call me (714-578-9555 Fart. 238) or our Project Manager, Thomas M. Dawes, (714-378-3205) at your earliest convenience. The Groundwater Replenishment System is the future of effective water management in California and other water restricted areas. Iry Pic Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee A pee effort of Oe Onmr Comq Ware,N m aM ft Ceumr Sommum Disoias of Omnge County (714)378.3200 • Fax(714)378.3373 • I OS00 Ellis Avenua • Founmin Valley • Califomia 92708 V Groundwater D M ` w Replenishment System January 7, 1998 The Honorable Don Bankhead and City Council Members City of Fullerton 303 W. Commonwealth Avenue Fullerton, CA92632-1775 Dear Mayor Bai�klWed: - As you may have read recently in the local newspapers, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) and the Orange County Water District(OCWD) are jointly sponsoring the study of an exciting new water project—the Groundwater Replenishment System—that will ultimately provide our area with 100,000 acre-feet per year of new, high-quality drinking water, enough to satisfy the water needs of 200,000 families. The Groundwater Replenishment System will take highly treated wastewater now sent to the ocean and treat it through state-of-the-art, energy-efficient microfiltration and reverse osmosis processes to standards that will exceed all drinking water requirements. Some of the water will then be naturally percolated into Orange County's large, underground water basin where it will actually improve the quality of our groundwater by reducing its overall salinity. The remainder of the water will be used for irrigation, industrial use, and for pre!^cting the basin from seawater intrusion. Extensive environmental, feasibility and economic studies are currently underway, however, our own initial studies, confirmed by an outside team of financial experts, indicate that the project is cost effective especially when compared to the cost of future imported water. We have launched these studies recognizing that the population of Fullerton and other Orange County cities will continue to grow rapidly over the next twenty years. We feel it will be difficult, if not impossible, to meet future water needs without a program like this, especially if there are less than normal rainfall conditions, not to mention a drought. Both agencies are committed to assuring that the communities they serve have a reliable, high-quality water supply, and feel that an innovative project such as the Groundwater Replenishment System, coupled with conservation, is the only realistic alternative. The County Sanitation Districts, as part of their Strategic Plan, are currently evaluating ways to further enhance our water supply through improvements to existing water conservation programs. Enclosed is some additional information about the Groundwater Replenishment System for you and your Council members. Our Project Manager, Tom Dawes, is also available to provide any additional information you may desire and would like to conduct a city council study session on this important project. We look forward to working with you and your city on this vital component of our future water supply. Since Iry Pickier, Chairman Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Enclosure Apra effort uftlre OmngeCovVWiner Dinner end she County Senimdon Dinnce:of Omnre Cooney (714) 378-3200 • Fax(714) 378-3373 10500 Ellis Avenue • Founnin valley California 92708 J0.N 13 '92 16;43 M PILLS6RY MRD I56V 619 236 19 TO 18 P.02 Pilllssbbnry 5R® N c�T®awwr VIM two sAX tffiln GwLWNA mntan iw9ttvtG (etq a»!Ow fAx(tl%rlLtlS Madiwon a Sutro LLP ctim',dorm 5.l�h,e/1 (619) 544-3177 January 13, 1998 VIA FACSIMILE TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST Re: In re Cowin of re County of Orao_ gc Dear Pool Participants: We continue to monitor the status of various post-confirmation issue$ in the County's bankruptcy tau. On December 23, 1997, Bankruptcy Judge Ryan approved the OCIP compromise with the County regarding the $30 million in settlement fiords from settlement of the Merrill Lynch investigation by the District Attorneys office, and $17.6 million of additional funds. On January 12, 1998, United States District Judge Gary Taylor considered Fuji's Motion for Partial Summary Judgmevt on the Pleadings. The matter was taken under submission, and when we receive Judge Taylor's ruling, we will advise you of the outcome. During the next several months, the District Court will consider two motions in the Merrill Lynch civil action which may impact the case. On February 9, 1998, the Court will consider Merrill Lynch's Motion to Transfer Venue to a Federal Court located outside of California On March 16, 1999, the Court will consider Merrill Lynch's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment- We will contact you soon regarding distribution of settlemem funds, the Court's ruling on the Fuji motion and any additional information regarding these matters. lust rvao tin wtwau Mar eau aurce tvtnrtr e.eAAtaatm sw rsAwsw sum.vwuAv'rvwvmw-my ere w+o rtrc rorro 211r .. SAN 13 '98 16:43 FR PILLSBURY WIDISON 619 236 1995 TO 18 P.03 Orange County Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Counsel Jamaay 13. 1998 Page 2 If you have any questions, Please do not Lesitate to contact me. very WA ours, P a: Tom Hayes Official Investment Pool Participants' Committee and Counsel ao� cw TQTRL PAGE.03 v wvla an....Vo. A SEASON OF CHANGE by 1.6c R Wook., Qnecl Ala. M,.*.m lVorm,Do., (Svithere Wfe. Provide, Men,1.R. .W.Pky Somman, I-AnP.i C-kf—. Drumbe,2.1997 ................................................... ..... .................. I'd Ulm us talk to you today about change.Ift`e aU that suppirs southern California Is a massive of renewable experienced charge we di nexach,jobs and socomi ent value,a resource to be protected in all cons.Each of mars our spouses.Those of in who grew up in places other Metampothen!s..be,agentles is.tionsaft of that reamme Than southern Cididonam have been lucky enough to witness with a fiduciary responsibility to one mother and to the the change of assames.Change cm be good.It usually means region as 2 whole.U them is to be change,ks it be change progress and improvements.And demise Is almost always the to improve the system,not in pick it apart,bit by In,and much elan mohmonary process thei blends;the scaldfity of risk destroying it. the past with the potential of the fircre, When we talk about the fincre ofSDthe.California A Rebirth of the Water Industry water,we're talking about change...change in supply and Pound at the duredmid of the 2 lat caustury,we're pan demand,change In military regulation and change in The my of a mbinh of the water industry it's the springtime of our we manage water resources.But we Ming dist does not sessional cycle.Everything is fresh and new and the possuldli- charge is die water policy must be governed by a possuccom was are endless.CAJJED,.connection of sere and federal concern for the public we".MaahuluRg the reliability, alleades,is preparing in defiver its preferred intricate for sidequaty and safety of the water supply and remaining fix solving the problems of The Bay-Delta.Negotiations an cost are at the win of public interest and most be considered underway within Cadman and with the other six Colorado the highest priority in airy debate over over inces. River Basin stores to forroulase a comprehensive California A Regional Solution to Water Management Plan for Colorado River waver. The"or industry has moved into a new am in which The itiongrood water delivery system..aged by the the economic and arvimnmmul unnegrity,of our water Metropolitan Water Distrux and its 27 member agencies is an delivery moom ts hist as important as the engineering need unparalleled Southern,California resource.It Is,in fact,the lexce.Metropolitan is confidern that we are well positioned epitome of a high-quefiry,not-for-profit service noterprace, to change with The notes, Metropolitan wan simulated by an as of The me Behind That offingraces to lunge he the dericts nown Legislature to serve the public,to assure a reliable supply of values:public service,water sicarrin innighly and mammon. The highest quality sever it The loam possible cos.Nothang; The 21a money will be the eve of the commencinven utility. has happened to alter this purpose. 0 we are to survive,we must be prepared to provide ow. Back in 1928,Metropolitan was forced to build and exceding reamincr service in a comporeatim marker operate the Colorado River Aqueduct to being supplesesual water to South=California.Whim commudoo of the A Vision for the Future sapseduct was completed in 1941,we literally gave sway,the The vialm for the furore is clear Metropolitan is seeking wind supply of water how to get the public to stet wiling,it. the hout possible means to cauxure the region has what it We offered discounts for agricultural weer in more years mads to metric and nowashm.reliable,Safe,efficiew supply to support the operation of the system.In fan,we still do. of water.Working with cur member and sompandox,w More aim half a come,later.Metropolitan delivers have developed an integrated Resources Plan.M diversified each year from the State Warner Project and The Colorado approach to resource resexposent includes not only import. River newly 60 Perim(ofSouthem California's nower supply ad weer scipfdes lam.balance of 1.0 resources such. This wism Is delivered&tough Mivwpoktxxns hawbodon conservation,reclamation,groundwater sumage,recovery syntax:775 aides of papetum,eight rescamem,and file fihm- and coutmetive war as well as dessalwaffican. not phase.This unique asycess,sallfics the fife-blood-for Since the IRP was named in 1993,Motimpolnut has Southern California,and the surn of the whole synew is fir invested more dam$3 billion to developing local resources. greater than its parts No singe member agency could cown With them documents,the djawnt will be IN percent ask. on a reliable water supply without the emit,system. able for at true The next 10 year .evert under a repent of To put the value of Metropolitan m perspective,Blow 1991 drought conditions.Th.,innestiorms;have not,manner. current contaminated and political malitia,you couldi placed a ficanced hardship on our member agencies. build This system today.sold sman 9 you could build it.you Mcowwolwxss hill service untreated"ter rate is only Weddisil afford to pay for 31.The me of our service to exuar. expected to increace,by less than one percent over then. survers 6 far below The replacement cons of the Wcon. 10 mart.Adjusting for furnme,inflawor.the duscrica'a over This brings as back in the mind to protect the public me in the year 2007 will be mbs=JaUy less than it is today interest throughout this period of dwagc.The enter station P.bl.xhird is he., ... ...ices .... ............ .. ....... Meme,mbigns Soil Is as marg,the public interest on the me terms.But Monopoles owning and will no through practices,based on sound economic and fiessend jeopardize the reliability and Sued soundivess,of the regional primples.We ran only commum to in"[our public service system goal 9 W remain finarcially, In his regard,[at me note thm MeuropolwwY water The continuing effectiveness of Metropolignat's water transport policy is to be neutral regarding monomer chose. delivery system depends on its finummal Integrity,and,so far, We try to charge the romen surnmart to more other water we've been able to maronalm Out Integn7y jus,two weeks ago through our"we as we charge to mine out mom water. the degront Ismand$650 offlion in wt.,revenue bonds.I IS other order 6 cheaper than M,.pObm water,It will an pleased to repot that Standard and Pm resigned IN men competitively through our symori. double,'R rating to this bond seeks This rating reflects the Timelier cans only become an issue If the transferred soundness of Mnurupoiiuw3 final policies and the confidence water 0 more uspernme than Metropolmers ower.In that of the flumecial commonly in our regional veer delivery now,the summer will have in decide whether the vine of signs,programs and management. an shergame to Metropoluan assin is words the ern e.g. This Is why t is an imponsaw to maintain the stability For example,efforts by rodividual Menropolman member and fiscid situations of MeuwpodnnY regional supply,Omvn. tilmorches to develop givemer,der-system reliability may have More than 16 million people depend on it.The swung a higher con than systrow-wid,allows.Thou who ch., works because it's an hawgumed,multi-faceted approach higher rediabdaythrough exim-sysecon means should be to 1011if4egin regrartid nefte man2gManL expected 10 pay dim cost.One regain memo[be expected But maintaining our finagamad Integrity takes cannot to subsidize the MOO that mother region pum on alternative vigilance.Some interest or other is alwast always smoking to nume supplies. take advantage of our signse a the experne,of some other interns Needless to say,this vigilarce has IN politick core, A Commitment to Swcaned and serrournot Metropolitan jug has to bear there polnical M the same's largest purveyor of treated drodws;water, cosm in order to provers the overall public honest. Metropolitan wourres the fires sham of responsibility for A "No Ham"Approach to Water 7numfers the security and reliability of Southern CAfforma*s water supply This Is a responsibility we do not take lightly.We Who don all of this mean for Our negaithations our me Commonly exploring ways to mum greater reliability nomr,managers;begins,Metropolitan,The Sam Diego county by developing broader system resources and by using our Water Authority and the Imports]Irrigation Districa? economies sale for the benefit of all of our numbers. Metropolitan surono supports,water mussfins.We What does this am in moms of regional benefits?To encourage the development of addimunil,lower cam,water provide the region aids emergiong supplies.we're building resources,by my party.To the went that our common On Sewhere CidlfiornO largest drinking water regavolt,dou- do it boa for lee,well emouninge and asses them.However, bling our surfine sat age capacity I've already shared with we have a responsibility to all of our camuners not to indoor you our diverse Integrated Routines Plan for long-term the basic principles of effident and equitode com-recoway. water misturce management.Were providing the means by We caurm,sacrifice system sim-recovery in order to submim, width members can agree with other members to uwasin water munfers.On the other had,mod cost-rectivery surplus water in periods of short supity.we're also providing practices me Judy consistent visit effichaut"Itursary trainsfiss the means for gunner reliability to dim members who are of water and water wheeling and will prevent molotable wiUmS to pay for is cost-shifting among our customers. The 20th nantry saw,the sparsely populated Southerm In a merm smagment to the iumMy Weser,Parks and Califtervot doessam sum into one of the most prosperous and Wildlife Common,Corrosion Chairman Michael Madrado datable region in the would.Behind this transformation is said,"We need a water trader policy thin is him to all ,swer,of winter.h began I.the em,days with mience and participate.We mund a water orturifir policy Sea pan water technology.When William Mulholland built the Los Mgelca when It is needed at a price that a reasonable...and allows Aqueduct,he was,faced with a monumental eingmearmit few. Niger mention so long in the morwasocom no dim not From dime early days No moved into an cm driven more produce a windfall prolm" by regulation than technology.State and federal regulators Metropolitan supports this portion and is romovelued to imposed more and mom stringent rquirmanums on the facilitating such transient providing them an no third-parry health and safiny of the water wo dolbegod But today our brings.But them transfers may result In megaton nomadic industry has mod line a customer-doom, humus to entire agricultural regions as well ON costsliffong Competitive business It's a whole am approach—with new to non participating urban agendes.This is Out acceptable. riles,new players and.ew ho uses. eivan imingfinn should hard,bed)the buyer and the taller Mim.,oloas wel no in on dus a.n of reldirsh.Through witham hum an sawn bromandre instance;devespenew program and responsible We want our member agencies to ban AD the supply theme,sec'm positioned ourselves to save and mlialiffity Dreyer willing to pay for.Moropcilltan encesur- the public comment in the 219 century,Using a diversified ages the chains that San Diego or any other member agency regional approach to long-term water rams es manage- an establish without reducing the financial integrity of the man(,we've increased our reliability while nowntaming,water water sysiew.Each member agency has the right to acquire quality and affordability.Managing 10 survive is simply not attention waser supplies and to use MnmopomamY sygmen enough in this busincess.We raw manage to succeed. ...........................—-------........... i ' ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND NOTES TO THE C MB WING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TUNE 30. 1997 1. ORGANIZATION Orange County Bankruptcy On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (the "County") filed for protection under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy Code following significant losses in the County's investment portfolio(the'Tool"). Plan of Adjustment On May 15, 1996, the United States Bankruptcy Court, ("Bankruptcy Court") Central District of California confirmed the County's Modified Second Amended Plan of Adjustment (the 'Plan"). The Plan, among other things, created the Orange County Litigation Fund (the "Litigation Fund"), appointed a representative (the"Representative") to enforce, prosecute and collect upon the various claims asserted by the County against third parties and directed the Representative to deposit and invest the monies contained in the Litigation Fund pursuant to guidelines established by the Plan. Litigation Fund Financing On June 13, 1996, the County transferred to the Representative $50 million to establish the Litigation Fund. The source of these funds was Recovery Certificates of Participation, which the County issued in a public offering. The Certificates of Participation are obligations of the County and are payable from the County General Fund. Appointment. Compensation and Indemnification of the Representative I The Plan appointed Thomas W. Hayes as the Representative effective June 12, 1996. The Plan provides for the Representative to receive reasonable compensation and reimbursement of expenses from the Litigation Fund. In addition to this, the Representative is to receive 1.5% of any litigation proceeds, as defined in the Plan, in excess of$200 million collected, recovered or received by the Representative. The Representative and the Representative's agents are to be indemnified by the Litigation Fund from and against any and all claims that may be asserted against them in their capacity as Representative and Representative's agents. i ORANGE COUNTY LTI'IGATION FUND NOTES TO THE COMEIINM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DUNE X 1997 1. ORGANIZATION- (Continued) purpose and Use of the Litigation Fund The Litigation Fond is to be used by the Representative to enforce, prosecute and collect upon Pool Related Claims, as defined in the Plan. Monies from the fund are to be used to pay for the services and expenses of the attorneys, paralegals, computerized document management services, accountants and expert witnesses engaged to assist in the prosecution, enforcement and settlement of these clams. Litigation Fund Trustee The Representative has selected State Street California, Inc. to act as the Litigation Fund's Trustee to hold investments made with monies contained in the Litigation Fund. Investment Guidelines for the Litigation Fund The Plan set forth investment guidelines for the Litigation Fund. The Litigation Fund can invest in relatively safe investments which include United States Treasury Securities, obligations of United States Government agencies, commercial paper, negotiable certificates of deposits, repurchase agreements, banker's acceptances and money market funds. 2. RELATED LAWSUITS The County initiated and the Representative now has the authority to prosecute and enforce, a number of lawsuits in an effort to recover on Pool Related Claims. A brief description is as follows: Merrill Lynch The County Sled an amended suit against Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner& Smith, Inc.; Merrill Lynch Government Securities, Inc.; Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc.; Merrill Lynch Money Markets, Inc. (collectively "Merrill") on October 25, 1995. Among other things, the County alleged that Merrill breached its fiduciary duty to the County and engaged in transactions with the County by which the County incurred obligations that violated statutory and constitutional limits. The County's damage clean against Merrill is in excess of$2 billion. 6 ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND NOTES TO THE COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS RJNE 30, 1997 2. RELATED LAWSUITS - (Continued) KPMGPeat Marwick The County filed an amended complaint against KPMG Peat Marwick CTPMG') on December 20, 1995. Among other things, the County alleged that KPMG did not adequately perform its responsibilities as the County's auditor and failed to give proper warnings to the County Board of Supervisors that could have prevented the authorization of incremental borrowings and would have resulted in the cessation of illegal and speculative investments in the County's investment portfolio. The County's damage claim against KPMG is in excess of$2 billion. LeBoeut Lamb, Greene The County filed an action against LeBoeg Lamb, Greene& &MacRae MacRae("LeBoeuf') on June 11, 1996. Among other things, the County alleged that LeBoeuf failed to adequately perform its responsibilities as the County's attorneys and knew of the extreme sensitivity of the County investment portfolio to interest rate risk but failed to warn the County Board of Supervisors. The County's damage claim against LeBoeuf is approximately$900 million. Rauscher Pierce Refsnes The County filed an action against Rauscher Pierce Refsnes ("Rauscher") on June 11, 1996. Among other things, the County alleged that Rauscher, failed to adequately perform its responsibilities as the County's investment advisor and failed to warn the County Board of Supervisors of the OCIP's excessive sensitivity to interest rate changes. The County's damage claim against Rauscher is approximately$500 million. Standard&Poor's The County Sled an amended complaint against Standard & Poor's ("S&P"), an operating division of McGraw Ifill, Inc, on April 8, 1997. Among other things, the County alleges that S&P negligently advised the County that its indebtedness should be highly rated and falsely assured the County that the Treasurer's investment strategy was safe. The County's damage claim against S&P is in excess of$500 million. 7 ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND NOTES TO THE COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS R&E 30. 1997 2. RELATED LAWSUITS -(Continued) Morgan Stanley The County Sled an action against Morgan Stanley ("Morgan") on June 11, 1996. Among other things, the County alleged that Morgan engaged in transactions with the County by which the County incurred obligations that violated statutory and constitutional limits. Further, the County alleges that Morgan violated the automatic stay in the County's Chapter 9 case by liquidating certain collateral of the County. The County's damage claim against Morgan is for an amount to be determined at trial. Student Loan Marketing The County Filed an amended complaint against the Student Association Loan ("Sallie Mae")Marketing Association on December 23, 1996. Among other things, the County alleged that Sallie Mae sold the County risky securities without adequate disclosure in violation of the United States securities laws. The County's damage claim against Sallie Mae is in excess of $Sg million. Fuji Securities The County filed an action against Fuji Securities, Inc. ("Fuji") on September 17, 1996. The County alleges that Fuji, as one of the County's former brokers, facilitated the investment scheme pursued by the former Treasurer by, among other things, engaging in illegal reverse repurchase transactions with the County in violation of California Constitutional and Government Code provisions restricting borrowing and investing activities by municipalities. Further, the complaint alleges that Fuji aided and abetted the former Treasurer's breach of fiduciary duty and that Fuji violated the automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code by liquidating certain collateral of the County. The County's damage claim against Fuji is in excess of$120 million. 3 ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND NOTES TO THE COMIlR4M FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DUNE 30, 1997 2, RELATED LAWSUITS - (Continued) Other Broker-Dealer The County filed three suits against additional broker-dealers Proceedings on December 5, 1996. In one complaint, the County asserted clams against Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., Bear Stearns Securities Corp., Cantor, Fitzgerald Securities Corp., Citibank, N.A., Citicorp Securities, Inc., Daiwa Securities America, Inc., Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp., DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc., CS First Boston Corporation, First Boston Corp., Credit Suisse Financial Products,Kidder, Peabody& Co., Lehman Brothers International (Europe), Lehman Capital Corp., Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc., Lehman Brothers, Inc., Nomura Securities International, Inc., Paine Webber, Inc., Paine Webber Real Estate Securities, Inc., Prudential Securities, Inc., Sanwa Securities (USA) Co., LP., SBC Capital Markets, Inc., and Smith Barney, Inc. In a second complaint, the County asserted claims against BA Securities, Inc. an affiliate of Bank of America. In a third complaint, the County asserted claims against Paribas Corporation. These three complaints allege that these broker-dealers facilitated the investment scheme pursued by the former Treasurer by engaging in illegal reverse repurchase transactions with the County and/or by selling to the County certain securities in violation of California Constitutional and Government Code provisions restricting borrowing and investment activities by municipalities. The complaints also allege that several of the broker-dealers violated provisions of federal bankruptcy law when they liquidated and seized certain collateral securities belonging to the County. The complaints seek damages according to proof at trial. 9 ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND NOTES TO THE COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30. 1997 2. RELATED LAWSUITS - (Continued) Other Issuers of On December 5, 1996, the County Sled three suits against Structured Notes entities that issued structured notes that were purchased by the County. In the first complaint, the County asserted claims against Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA"). In the second complaint, the County asserted claims against the Federal Home Loan Banks CTELBs"). In the third complaint, the County asserted claims against Federal Farm Credit Banks ("FFCBs"). In each of the complaints, the County alleged that in selling the structured notes to the County, the defendants violated the California Corporations Code and section 10(b) of the 1934 Federal Securities and Exchange Act. The County further alleges that, in selling the structured notes to the County, the defendants committed Saud. The complaints seek damages according to proof at trial. Brown&Wood On December 5, 1996, the County Sled a suit against Brown & Wood and Paul C. Pringle, individually and as representative of the class of all partners in Brown&Wood at any time between March 2, 1994 and December 6, 1994. The complaint alleges breach of contract, professional negligence, negligent misrepresentation and aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty. Brown & Wood was retained through Leifer Capital to serve as Disclosure Counsel for each of the County's 1994-1995 short-term borrowings. The complaint alleges that Brown&Wood in the course of its duties knew or should have known the financial condition of the County and the OCIP and that it Sailed to adequately disclose this information in the official statements that it drafted on behalf of the County. ro Oran a County Council of Governments December 11, 1997 John Collins Joint Chairman County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Dear John: On behalf of the Orange County Council of Governments(OCCOG), I wanted to let you know how much we have appreciated being able to utilize the Sanitation District's meeting rooms to convene several of the OCCOG Board of Directors meetings during 1997. CSDOC staff has been both gracious in offering the meeting space and diligent to ensure its availability. Cymantha Atkinson and Michelle Tuckman have been most helpful and accommodating in this regard. Additionally,the OCCOG has benefitted from the knowledge and expertise offered by Don McIntyre during Executive Management Committee meetings and by Kevin Hadden during Technical Advisory Committee meetings. We hope to build upon the considerable successes that have been achieved during the OCCOG's inaugural year, and look forward to continued subregional and regional consensus-building with the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County on issues of mutual concem. Again, thank you for supporting the OCCOG. Sincerely, Laurann Cook Chair, Orange County Council of Governments Mayor, City of Fountain Valley attachment: OCCOG General Information Packet cc: Don McIntyre, General Manager occocvmaaeuttm Chies: Brta a Bonn Park a Conn Mao a Cypss a Dena Pont a Fountain Valley a Fulknon a Hunuvgmn Beech 6yioe V Heb.a Lo Palma a Laguna Bach Logue Niguel a Lake Fowl a to Alamitos a Minion Vm.a Newport Beach a Pkcenua a Son Clemsme a San Juan Capunanoo Sens Mu a Seel Bench a Stummm Tustin a Yl1a Park a Wamdo[or a Yorba Linda a Agencies: County Satustion Dinrics of Osage County a Eoo Omngn County Ware,Dlnuict a Et Tom Water Dourict FoothillIE umT.Ponnunn Comb,Agency'hylne Ranch Weser Duuic gc County Water DootI, a San Joaquin Hill,Tmoportmon Condor Agency 600 W Santa Ana Blvd.,Suite 214,Santa Ana,CA 92701 a (714)972-0077 a (714)972-1B16 fax a OCCOG®aol.com Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Olt ate ubject Orange County Register R FROM WASTEWATER TO,,GROUNDWATER By PAT eRExxAtt I ENVIRONMENT: Ofri- '1em keeping up with the de The Orange County Register , +a. mend,"It's Anthony said Wednes- CI8]f3 $400 M00il plan�day. ' got to come from would refill the ecxm r someplace—or we've got to tell n paper the proposal tf people to go away." looks like a. sure v B WBter tR]I]e8. Adding treated waste water tothing: H drinking-water Highly treated drinng-water supplies is noth- waste water would be ing a 13-mile pipeline from Foun- ing new; many Orange County O allowed to seep into twin Valley to Anaheim and in. residents probably have sampled the underground beds that hold 'stalling high-tech filtration sys. some without knowing it. much of Orange County's future tems that '•can remove It flows into the Santa Ana Riv- drinldng-water supplies. contaminants as small as indi-' er from treatment plants in the It could keep water costs down, vidual molecules. inland Empire, for example, is stave off water rationing during projections show the pophla- captured in settling basins and droughts, boost supplies for the tion of north and central Orange percolates through soil into county's rapidly growing popu- County, the area served by the ground water. ' lace and make better use of Orange County Water District, Treated waste water is inject- waste water that now is pumped- - growing from 2 million to 3 mil- ed into ground water near the out to sea. Bon by 2020. coast to keep sea water from in- But there is one great un- But ground water —. which vading water supplies,and is lat- known:how the public will react. makes up about 60 percent of the er pumped out for drinking. Water officials this week began a county's water supply — dwin- ' What is new, however, is the yearlong effort to introduce dles rapidly, said district direc- filtration system that the Orange Orange County to the$400 million for Philip L. Anthony. ,- County Water District and the plan, which would involve build- "There's a tremendous prob- pease see WATER Page 9 RECYCLING WASTE WATER '` ' (kd]e Cpwnwdioffidanw,m 1.ins pain,wine W,Qa inn �� rNeldwM uMergmuM wate,7 uopliex poand,INnpWiigdvm w,urcam,Mmeetig .� '�. �P�In imeavn9 demaw expened inmmng tlemd¢ is 1. - e,ra,aeeodeuw,pe ab` Ee nrauw uMa�w mmt _ w `o" .n _ ._ve,teEmm,tenCmkage. =� Bo pertmt .� Poxned mr aiWargeE inn r na0.cwaprdeak3 axM1`" \.pfine:as grlwv vt ®,.a"Bpembyel.m�er '-S E'�'mmme:'vtm9� RAIN ;nd g.. �.•famr.o. - REVERSE WHAT? I�apprr ga. - }1a it h Rere's ntwreene osmosis works � 1sarMittel(li Ycdrs f 7.iveaunred 2lmpuritles n1Ya,Owrtw"1�ttlyeut rwne water pumped gipped. pexnm mewan ode. I oppugn membwm. memMn. tuned wa�� t 3.PsnifiM wan �r queened imp moe SIZE COMPARISON FRINV®RMn,waxr malralle pmanrm Ind,Ixnriuni 1 were mnveab 011VZeTmde wok EetM tiv \_�` - f/ pfamtIXpader_ Wbmrmew ra"wr'wm°ingeomn GE00.GE NRNEYRM Oxeye roomy Fe9mer WATER: Current supply won't be sufficient mom 1 Orange Cowry Sanitation Dis- ed water would be piped along said the proposal stands like a tricts envision. the Seam Ana River to Anaheim, good idea.as long as the water is The Sanitation Districts'plan[ where it would take about a year carefully filtered and allowed to in Fountain Valley already to settle from holding ponds into pemolate into the ground water. Mats water flowing in through deep aquders. rather than being piped in or in- the sewer system until it is dear. Sand and sod would provide jetted. odorless and almost as tree of yet another.natural filter.and to Bob Caustin, director of De- bacteria as drinking water. It is some cases the water would be fend the Bay, led the fight .ad primarily for irrigation and seated with chlorine as it was landscaping, nor for drinking. pumped out for drinking. channagainst an terli<r proposal to By 2020, after being built in Orange Cowry could be among Upper Newport waste the liver nto stages,the new system would di- the first to use such a complex Upper Newport Bay; the Irvine vein about IW,M acre-feet of filtration system,although other Ranch Water Distract atte waste water per year into two communities throughout the studio no longer plans[o attempt highly sensitive filters. (One state and nation have been ustng `be[' acre-foot is enough to supply two treated waste water to recharge But Cawtin said the❑eamtent families of four with water far a gmwd-water supplies for years plan sketched out by the Orange One filter — a mlcrofilter — County and PeAax Cho ry,Va.. �y Water District would be unlikely at JeoPardtre public would remove bacteria,some vi. according to rosesroh done by health. roses and larger molecules. A the Orange Cowry Water Dis- "H they twat it to the level second system—reverse osmo- tract. they're speaking of,it would be a sis—would remove smaller mol. H the new system is installed, wonderful thing,"Caustin said. ecales.such as salts,and any re- some surplus water may be public hearings will be held awma g bacteria or viruses. available during emergencies and written responses to the pro Such a system is needed in an for south county water districts. posal will be sough[, water offi. because of the size variations which have virtually no ground cials said.The fast hearings will among contaminants. water and import almost their be Jan. 13.one at 3:30 p.m. and "If a water molecule were the entire water supply. Snow said. one at 7 p.m., to the district's slzeofatemusball.aviroswould One local dean-water activist board room in Fountain Valley. be the size of a semi;'said Tama S.Snow,a senior engineer at the Orange Cowry Water District. "A bacterium would be the size of the Luxor Hotel in Las Vegas." After being filtered, the treat- Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Paper Section Page # Date Subject F=L - s Times / 12 1 P �� -a 1 Proposal Would WATER Reclamation Plan Conthmed from III on golf courses and coursed Make Waste Water the Orange County Water Dtshict =Ugghatr conditioning systems in Fit for Drinking t which u propos to the Districts erith Orange Co of drin has nwater in the County Sanitation D1sWem of a source of d. Similar water In Orange County. Orange County. Slmilaz projects, 0amg micro-nitration and re- however, in Los Angeles County ■ Resources: Officials say verse osmosis technology,the new and Fairfax County,Va.,have been plant would process waste water deemed highly successful. $40D-mi]lion project is nee"to that the sanitation district now Currently, the orange County ensure rising demand Can be met Pumps into the ocean.Once it Was Water District, which is the sole treated at the Proposed plant, at agency responsible for managing the water dtnrict's current head- Orange County's ground-water By HOPEHAMASHIGE quarters In Fountain Valley, the basin, replenishes the basin with SPECIAL to WE TIMES water would be sent through 13 water imported from the Colorado FOUNTAIN VALLEY—A plan unveiled mile of pipeline along the Sanm River and with water it traps in the Wednesday would convert billions of got- Ana Riverbed m Anaheim.There it Santa Ana River. lone of waste water to drinking water each would be released into a aeries of Water district board members existing ponds that act as a natural said the need for new water year to meet growing demand and protect Orange County in the event of mayor water filler and wouldseep into the sources has become urgent because drought ground-water basin below, which Southern California might not he unty'e two largest supplies water for central and able to rely on a steady supply Officials of Orange Co water and sanitation undisty's said the northern Orange County. from the Colorado River or the proposed 5400-mimon project would re- The plant would produce 100,000 Sacramento Bay Delta In the fu- plenioed $40eCounty'sroject ground-water re- acmfeet of water each year,nearly true. sin and creme an important new source of enpugh to supply the 1 million new California consistently has taken residents who are expected to more than its allotted share from water for Orange County as the threat of move Into north and central the Colorado River. But several severe shortages looms over Southern Orange County by 3030. states, including Arizona, Nevada, California I Anthony said the board is pre- Colorado and Utah,are protesting "We need more water, and we have pared for some resistance from the that practice because they also exhausted many alternatives to get more public, because many people are need the water. water."said Philip L Anthony,dlrectar of put off by the idea of drinking Also, Concerns over enviren- Plem see WATER,115 treated waste water. 4 mental damage in the SacramentoSouthern "Shoe people have ec emotional Bay Delta has [arced Southern reaction against it, because they hoped m take less water than think they are drinking sewer 6oThefor o agencies s are. water,"he said. The two nce then are exploring lo tam.Ism year the Irvine Ranch ways m finance the project,includ- Water District scrapped plans to Ing applying far grants and ailing send reclaimed water through the bonds. Upper Newport Bay,because envi- Tema Snow, an engineer with romnentalists and residents feared the water district,said the cost of the treated sewage water would the project probably would not damage the environment affect water rates because there But water district officials said would be significant savings from Wednesday that the techniques u®ng recycled rather than im- they plan in employ would Create ported water to replenish the basin.' water so mean It would rival the The first in a series of public taste and quality of bottled drink- hearings an the proposal will be ingwater.. held Jan.13 from 3:30 to 5 p.m.and "It is very high quality water," from 7 m &.30 p.m. at the Orange Anthonysaid County Water District 10500 Ellis Reclaimed water has been used Ave.in Fountain Valley. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject L � =j I it Y/97 1 JQbo- aL Project calls for treated waste water 0 public meetings will Sanitation Districts of Orange to meet the demand. approved,the system could pro- County—both Fountain VaOey- Additionally,this system duce up to 100,000 acre feet of be held Jan. 13 to dis- based agencies that manage would reduce the county's water annually.The current cuss the multimillion- water resources dependence on demand for water is 500,000 acre —will hold two r-------------I----------1. water pur- feet per yea. roosa dollar l. public informs- i F.Y.I. i chased from 'Everyone will benefit from proposal. lion sessions on ' ' the Colorado Jan. 13 at the i 9 WHAT.Public meetings for i fiver and the this reliable source of water By Kathleen Haney,Independent water District to i the Groundwater State Water said Tama Snow,senior engineer CUSCUae the ' Replenishment System. ' Project and al the Water District. "The tech- i p r nology used will be the same as FOIRVTAPI VALLEY— Groundwater ' 4 WHEN:ten. 13 r would bet t r that of bottle water companies.' rote Orange County's thirst for a retias - Replenishment i +p TIME:3:30 to 5 p.m.and 7 i such asp Slated to possibly begin in able supply of water could be System project. i to 9:30 p.m. i 1999,project construction will quenched for the next century if We've i .g WHERE:The Orange 1 Fountain if consist of a 13-mile pipeline built a proposed water replenishment looked at a lot i county Water District, 10500 i Huntln on m the Santa Ana River right-of. system is approved in 1999: of possibilities, i Ellis Ave,Fountain Valley. i Beach, way between Fountain Valley The program would take and this is one ,g CALL 378-3200 ' and Anaheim,with new injection treated waste water currently of the besh" r __� Anaheim, discharged into the ocean and said Ph �'-"""----""'--- Garden Grove, wells and a new treatment plant through advanced purification Anthony,director of the County Orange and installed at either the Orange methods make it available for Water District.He added that Santa Ana from future droughts. County Water District or the everyday uses—including water could become a precious Anthony said a mix of local, County Sanitation District of drinking,cooking and balKing. commodity as Orange County's state and federal funding is Orange County.Construction The Orange County Water population increases,so a safe, being looked at to hind the$300 won't affect local streets,said District and the County reliable water supply is needed to$400 million project.B Anthony. VWEIW 1WC 9 WRAP-UP Water Experts: Future Improvements Hinge on Using Watershed Approach Future versions of the Clean Water Act(CWA)will have to Paul Helmke,mayor of Fort Wayne,Ind.,and president of the encourage water quality improvements"watershedby-wa US. Conference of Mayors, agreed with Cook's notion of gov- tershed," according to Robert Perciasepe, assistant ad- comment agencies,businesses,and nonprofit organizations work- ministrator for water at the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency ing together and advocated more public private partnerships. (EPA)."It's more like guerrilla warfare than the saturation bomb- While discussing the challenges local government officials and ing of the last 25 years." their communities face,Helmke said the need for revenues and ex- To bring about positive change, Perciasepe recommended paraded investments is crucial because 91%of the costs assocl- thal ated with clean water standards are currently paid by mmmu- • clean water tools of the past 25 years he reevaluated because Cities. many have"maxed out"and that new ones be developed; "We]individual communities]need as much control as pos- • a"holistic"approach to individual watershed health,including sible at the local level to decide what is best for each communi- an increased focus on nonpoint source pollution,be taken;and ty,"Helmke said,citing problems many cities have with waste- j • more interaction among national,state,and local governments water during heavy rains."We want to make sure we don't just be used to salve localized problems. Perciasepe, the first of seven Tr panelists who spoke at the"National Issues" session, and other panelt; � speakers focused on watersheds and , nonpoint source pollution—areas critical to achieving high water qual- ity throughout the United States. The first of three panelists who _ provided a nongovernmental per- spective.Ken Kirk executive director of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, agreed with _- Perciasepe that a watershed ap- proach is needed. CWA's total its- regard for nonpoint source and wet weather pollution issues needs to be addressed,he said,recommend- ingthedevelopmentofanafgres- RnPNHRs air Ina,riialnt source and wet weatker polufion and some mallwd of financing are heeded to calgnueb knpmre wehrawNy. sive control program and the cre- ation of some method of financing water quality improvement have fishable,swimmable rivers while we have basements full of needs. sewage,"he added. Michael Cook, director of the EPA Office of Wastewater Randolph Wood,director of Nebraska Department ofEnviron- Management.agreed that some method of financing is needed be- mental Quality,recommended an approach similar to total quaF cause"the in-place,current value of sewers in the United States try management for solving problems in which"those who know is$2.3 billion"and the billions of dollars required for upkeep of the most about the problem or situation develop the solution." this system are unavailable. Both Jim Porterfield,technical specialist for water resources Beyond funding problems,some environmental problems in- issues at the American Farm Bureau Federation, and Robert volving point-source discharges from mining, animal feeding, Reich,principal consultant of environmental safety and process and collection systems still exist, Cook said,adding that these engineering at DuPont Co.In Wilmington,Del.,expressed concern types of point sources need some sort of National Pollutant about CWA enforcement.Porterfield said the future CWA could Discharge Elimination System regulation. achieve water quality improvements in agriculture through "jail, Cook recommended"cooperative programs with other[gov- large fines,and permits,or technology and incentives"PorteKeld eminent and nongovemment]agencies at the federal,state,and, said he hopes technology and incentives prevail.Reich,noting if possible, local level" to solve nonpoint source problems. that CWA has had a tendency to "hone-in on Industry," said Voluntary measures also are needed,he said, because a com- everyone plays a role in water quality problems so a future CWA prehensive set of regulations covering all local problems will should be Rexibile and locus on incentives,not enforcement. never exist. —Tam Hun, WE&T 40 WATER ENVIRONMENT a TECHNOLOGY Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # D to Subject Los Angeles Times Q 2 UMNE Water District Wins Environmental Award - The Ae of California Wales Agencies has awarded the Irvine Aanch Water District its Theo- dore Roosevelt Environmental .} Award r:..r ^r•:. Given Yearly in three project budget categories,'the awards recognize natural resources management programs that en- . hence or protect the environ- ment while meeting public needs. '.. ;,. . In the $25,000-or-less cat- + egary, the Irvine Reach Water , District was honored for its nura- { cry project. .. The project uses recycled wa- ter and state-of-the-art technof- 'i ogy to grow abode base that will be planted locally. .'. .-"r "-- The other two agencies hon- ored this year were the Castale, • Lake Water Agency, in the $25,000-m-S10D,0DD budget mt. ., egary;and the Fresmi Metropoll• C in Flood Control District,in the mare-than-$100,000 category. The association is a statewide '. organization with 440 members, � —LLSA ADDISON , Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Sefilion Page # Date Subject Orange County Register � 1214 711 San Diego near agreement to keep its water flowing RESOURCES: A pact aqueduct system completed in cent of its 2.7 million people,he would end near) two 1947 and paid off two years ago. said. y Johnson officially signed it over By 2015, the population is ex- years of feuding he- 10 MWD and the San Diego an. petted to be 3.8 million. tween the water all- thority. Thanks to conservation and San Diego got the 71-mile pipe- new reservoirs, Southern Cali- thority and the Metro- line across Riverside County fornia water supplies are fairly politan Water District. from the Colorado River aque- assured for the next 20 years, duct because the Navy, busy said John V. Foley,MWD chair- By CARRYGERBER with World War 11,needed water man. The Assodated Press for its base here. And customer rates shouldn't Some people wondered if the rise more than 2 Percent a year SAN DIECO — Water Some would get finished be- for the next decade, he predict- wheelers and dealers, celebrat- cause President Franklin D. ed. ing SO years of the aqueduct that Roosevelt used his special war Rates have been a major sock. nourished the city's postwar powers to authorize it, and the ing point in the water-transfer boom, said Wednesday that an war ended before construction argument. San Diego figures a agreement was near to keep wa- did,recalled Linden R.Burrell,a surcharge of about$60 per acre- ter Rowing for decades to come. Navy engineer who worked on foot is fair,while the MWD wants The pact would end nearly two the system. to charge its client about$260 for years of feuding between San "Without it, we wouldn't be use of the facilities. Diego's water authority and here,"mid Stephen P.Cushman, An acre-foot is enough water Southern California's giant Met. chairman of the Greater San Die- for one or two families a year. ropolitan Water District over dr go Chamber of Commerce. He The "surplus" water is avail- liveries from the Colorado River. pointed to a booming complex of able from new conservation An announcement on "wheel- high-tech industries and steady measures on farms near the Col- ing," or transferring the water, population growth. orado. There are a tangle of is- could come as early as next week The area's 10 inches of rain a sues still to be resolved,Williams after meetings of the organizes- year would suffice for just 10 per- cautioned. tions'boards,said Maureen Sta- pleton, general manager of the San Diego Water Authority. That would not be too soon for federal authorities and Califor- nia's neighbors.Arizona and orb. er sates along the Colorado have been demanding that California stop taking more than its share from the river. "If California can't tie its loose ends together, It's hard to even think about stable relationships with other states," said Howard S.WBliamsol'Vista,a directorof 1 the 'an Diego authority."1 think we're seeing some good changes, some very positive things." The water bosses joined engi- neering old-timers and Robert . W. Johnson of Boulder City, Nev.,director of the lower Colo- rado for the U.S. Bureau of Rec- lamation, at a ceremony beside San Vicente Reservoir, 20 miles northwest of the city. The lake is the terminus of an Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times 102611 WATER: Little District Won't Go Tiny Water District Conti noed from at reached on finding a way to settle the will be held In six months. dlspute It was a victory for ny the city Refuses to Pull Plug lAwsonboard amdiree be o�fardatrict aYe wooduld like-Chles,said Jim While �rbtproheuwaaltens does not eetep"�ct,he ■Utilities:Trl�th'3'wins a came erned. . . It's business as usual;' he LkFCO„ to appeal of panel's Bald. He believes the commission Intends to move to hill it and let San Clemente take Over. Could supported Tri-Galles' argument hold more meetings to decide whether to Mat In the conlrlllsoon's attempt to have take a different approach to dissolving We San Clemente take over Tri-Cities, We district or discuss whether Its action By DAVIDREYFS commission failed to follow the law and againstTri-Cities and other pending merg- TIMM sravr Wanes protect $35 million in meta and $2.5 edition In reserves held by Tri-Cures, areWekn could e that SANtodle. .NTFtA any South County warm dlMM according la "We knew that wehevc eta months anal refmvingju. Lawson. - a fug hearing Is held Serving Jm170,000 customers. the Ttf-(.Yam Municipal Gourd cured "By 8 transferring Td-Cities' on the temporary Water District has fought an uphill battle against the local transferring TBy , Y g . Injunction;.' said Agency Formation Commiedon, which has targeted the Gould corporate corporate powers to San Parnma district Aug unnecessary the alsalofgover to powers to San We- Clemente in a proceeding The commission's ' Leal August, the coy of an acted to dissolve the mente In a proceed. The marked the distinct and allow the city of San Clemente m take over Its ing which Is not a Which Is not a conselldatlonv first time that a operstlon. consolidation, not not the creation of a subsidiary wholesale water The district's efforts to change the commission'smind the creation of a agency was tar- faaed. subsidiary district district nor a merger,the gated for dissolution So the district went to court, end last week Superior nor a merger, the commission acted outside of and Its furelluns Court Commissioner F. Latimer Gould agreed with Tri- commission acted Its legislative authorization.' city,Clem Calm' m arguent and invalidated the commLaUon's decision outside of Its legie- this rose. Sa when he Issued a preliminary Injunction halting the lative authorization F.IATWBI aptaD mente. About le district's dlssolutlun. - In fashioning an Im- Commissioner other mergers and A hearing on whether to make the b*mcann permanent proper'hybrld'pro- proposed dissolu- Flom m WATM ES reduce." none are pending In addition,Gould Bald, We commisslun before thecommLvslon. failed to handle properly cox revenue Tri-Cities Is fighting the takeover by, exchanges.He also faulted the commission San Clemente,arguing that a municipality, for not properly Informing San Diego shouldn't have control over a regional County of Its action concerning Tri-Cities, water wholesaler.Instead,the 37-year-old whose service area Includes the San Ono- district has asked that It be allowed to- fre Nuclear Generating Station and elate merge with the Municipal Water District of parks In north San Diego County. Orange County. Michael W.Parneas,city manager of San What effect the corm elm ones a decision Clemente, which was a defendant In TH. could have on the com ndmilon'a other Clues lawoult, said that a meeting was , merger attempts lent clear.The comeals- held after Could's ruling with represents. slon's staff could not be reached for lives from county government, the com. comment bemuse the agency was closed' mission and city. But no decision was for the holiday. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register A p 2J Where shall we put all the animal waste? The staggering amount of an- imal waste produced on Amen. can farms often pollutes water, and the risk fs growing as more large-scale UBlfaock operations take hold,according to a new U.S. Senate study. The study found that the amount of animal manure pro- duced in the United States is 130 times greater than the amount of human waste,and that there are no national stan- dards for dealing with the ani- mal waste. For example, a single SO,OOD- acre hog farm being built in _ Utah could potentially put out more waste than the city of Los Angeles,the study said. — From Register next Services Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page# Date Subject Orange County Register Water bonds ro osed p p ENVIRONMENT: Dem- fornia's water and park infra Some lawmakers are skepti- the county would be eligible to structure, in his last year as the cal, however, that the Legisla- receive tens of millions of dollars Gerais like Wilson's in- state's chief executive, are his ture will be willing to place so for beach and coastal improve- terest, but aren't sure most aggressive efforts to ad- many bond measures before vot. ments as well as Rood control dress environmental concerns. ers. projects.Several Orange County voters will approve of Wilson administration officials "If voters are asked togoto the beaches are among the most too much borrowing. are still trying to decide whether well too often,there's some pmb- heavily used state parks. the bonds should go before voters ability they all might go down to The water bonds would devote By MARK KATCHES in June or November. First the defeat," said state Sen. John about war million for Rood con- The Orange County Reghter• .Proposals must pass in the De- Lewis, R-Orange. a ol,t$5 million for water dcon. macro[-controlled Legislature. Aeliv- ssembly Speaker Pro Tempo- cry and $260 million for water SACRAMENTO — Gov. Pete It is the latest bond initiative re Sheila Kuehl,D-Santa Monica, quality statewide. Wilson plans to unveil$2.1 billion from Wilson, who is ending his said she lhfnks the[ the Legisla- in bond proposals in his new bud- tenure with a flurry of plans to tore will have to at priorities The environment and park get to pay for water delivery and pay for infrastructure improve- and that not all the me asum"ill land proposal includes$100 mil. an improved environment. ments.The governor already has make it to the ballot. lion to help complete acquisition Documents released Monday unveiled an $e billion yroposal "Do you know what it means to of the state's 1,100-mile coastal show that the governor plans to for school construction bonds to float so many bonds now?" trail, $310 million for improve. ask the Legislature to let voters be spent over six years,and he is Kuehl said. "It means.you won't ments at the state's 264 parks, consider $1.3 billion measure to expected to push separate bonds have to worry about being $9S million for wetland acquisi- pay for flood control and water- for prison construction. around to pay them off." tions and $130 million to protect conservation, water-recycling Wilson officials believe voters, Assembly Democrats today 7,S00 acres of old-growth red- and water-quality Improve- who have rejected most bond is- Plan to release a 50-page report woods in Northern California. ments. sues this decade, will be more on their own coastal initiative Wilson, who will deliver his receptive now that the economy that calla for $700 million in The water bond second or ith Is eighth State of the State speech is robust. bonds for beach and ocean im- considered the second of three Wednesday followed by his Wilson's latest proposals were provements.The report does not state needed to ensure and el ade- 1998-99 fiscal year budget propos- greeted warmly by Democrats list specific Orange County pro- sys em :aatheustalte's papule ion al Friday,also wants$80o million and environmentalists. jects. continues to swell. Voters sp- in a separate bond measure de. "This is certainly the gover- Wilson also was light on details proved 5s t million ih 19%. voted to coastal and wildlife pro- nor's most ambitious effort," about Orange County projects he tection and improvements to the said state Sen. Jim Costa, wants to finance. But state voters have not ap- state park system. D-Fresno. "1'm pleased to see But that doesn't mean the proved bonds to pay for park im- Wilson's plans to shore up Cell- him join the fray." - county would be left out. In fact„ provements since 1988. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times 2- COSTA MESA 2 Panels Will Study Water District Issue With the threat of consolida- tion still looming, the board of the Mesa Consolidated Water District recently established two committees to study the issue. Diana Leach, the district's as- sistant general manager,said the board hopes to be prepared m the event it must be merged with another agency. A recent consolidation study done for South County special districts, as well as recent state legislation encouraging consoli- dations, suggested that Mesa be merged with Irvine Ranch Water District One committee will meet regularly with Irvine Ranch hoard members and the general manager,Ron Young. The other will meet with members of the Costs Mean City Council to keep them informed of developments. Leach emphasized there is not a proposal to merge the two water agencies. But if there is movement in that direction, the board wants to be prepared. "I think the board wants to begin studying all the alterna- tives,"she said. —HOPE HAMASHICE Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject_ Los Angeles Times I II10/98 Ly/,, & Safe Use of Biosolids •Re your Dee 17 editorial,"What's m 'Organic Food'? Still Plenty of Controversy": Your edilorial implied[he public would be asd if sewage sludge use were prohibited from the definition of "organic." You did not mention the inclusion of raw, unprocessed animal manures m the organic pro- duction of fruits and vegetables. Animal manures are high in soluble nutrients that could contaminate the ground water if not properly applied and managed Outbreaks of cryptoeporidium in Mllwaukee and pfiestena on the East Coast were related to animal manures.Despite these risks and the fact that the rule precludes any practice that could contaminate water by nitrates and bacteria, raw animal manures are permitted. On the other hand, biosolids (treated sewage sludge)Is a higghly regulated material. Biosolids applied to agricultural land for the production of crops for human con- sumption "presents negligible risk to the consumer" affording to the National Academy of Sciences' National Research Council. You claim Its use in any kind of agri- culture is questionable, given the tmdc industrial waste it often con. tams,including cadmium and lead" Between 1980 and 1991 Lee Ange- les reduced the level of cadmium and lead discharged to its sewage system by 93% and 87%, respec- tively.Farmers who have used the city's blosolids report increased yields and reduced irrigation and herbicide needs. ELLEN STEIN,President LA.Board of Public Works Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Orange County Register I �,, � a MARSH ON THE MEN® ENVIRONMENT: An _A vg xj, six-month project to re-create BIRDLAND / what was a nourishing marsh a Open house will Show- Restoration of a freshwater marsh In heine is LIRVRE� what w ago. nearly complete and trails will be open to the I F'.h S •fj., cDry,entury rectangular ponds case a restored bird publicbeginningSunday f �' plagued by foreign vegetaion sanctuary that's been A variety of bids can be pROIECr SIZE' now sparkle with fresh water for 'although there now, 10 years in the making. although panda are P t nesting shorebirda. Hill Wrgety barter plr 1/ Q ✓ - Thousands of Young willow, By NANCY TUNA of vegetation 'klirvlm rl i(I g '.• w,� a{ n sycamore and cottonwood trees The Orange County Register I In. 'h i 6 — native to Southern California r! ales — will eventually become a From Irvine f Nb'f a mltlgNlan r r r ij > sprawling.urban forest. dreds of black- �,�( nil ern 0 f e4l' A series of pedestrian fruits ck still birds wad A ( and observation decks has also ed on a mud net at it toe°'r"nr<h vs� been built for bird-watchers and Himah,e San Joaquin pro~Rom nature lovors. 1 E, a..:prompting a .I Protect supporters say They al- =C 1 pt - ready see a difference. face. lz grin an Peer Swans a / y _ f, elwn water orap i face. Sj Controlled oofAsa'av) anon area "It's loaded with birds, and "It's working,"mid Swan,the ,r mil# �� ens is when the vegetation comes In, unofficial rather of a $6 million } = ', Least eill vlreo its going to be fantastic," said marsh-restoration project."And ` t One of the native birds Beverly Spring,a volunteer coor- when this Is all planted and the Stawtu� f ( u4 that it is hoped will dinatar for the Orange County Dods ore arched over with -.o make Its home around chapter of the Sea and Sage Ab- rees, this is going to be knock i f the naw'Ponds, dubon Society. your neat." a t The 170-acre project was a Swan, a director of the Irvine- j ' ` joint effort between the district -�s r and former landowner, the Ir. Ranch Water Uislric4 can't help i,�l 1 but smile. Qom. \ vine Co. '!`•;; 1y - -ter vet_"-- Swan has overseen the project ,.He has nurtured a 10.year el- ��" 1 since restoration talks began a fort to revive the largest fresh- water wetland it, Southern Call. snhiin berm topmteo �i.i fiE decade ago,when the Irvine Co. forma. The district will host an bib born uaaknot se first proposed building a I.00o, open house Sunday toshowcasea Sowo.very Ammo WdtnpenM %e Diane County Register please we MARSH page +�f« \ 21 : ! � . \ 2 t MARSH: Wetlands restored FROM t unit apartment complex near the HOW TO TOUR MARSH marsh's duck ponds. The San Joaquin Marsh open After years of negotiating, the house will be from noon to 3 water district bought 3DD acres of p.m.Sun day.The Orange the SWacre wetland from the Ir- C chapter of the Sea and vine Co.for$18 millionin Decem- County D ber 1995, Swan said. Sage Audubon Society will The University of California, provide guided tours. Irvine, owns the remaining 200 An early-bird walk Is at 9 acres. a.m. . The.deal gave the Irvine Co. Visitors are encouraged to habitat mitigation credits for bring binoculars to view doz- restoration of the marsh. The em of bird species,including credits can be used to make up mallards,northern pintails, for the removal of other wetland American coots,ruddy ducks habitat In the company s future and red-shouldered and red- developments, including the tailed hawks. Bonita Canyon project at the Scopes will be available for Newport Beach-Irvine border, bird-watching. said Sat Tamaribuchi,vice presi- The marsh is bordered by dent of environmental affairs. Campus,Michelson and By June, funds were assem- Carlson drives and the San .bled to begin the project, which Diego Creek,near the Univer- included: sity of California.Irvine.Vlsi- ►Reconfiguring -100 acres of tors can enter the bird waterfowl ponds to attract nest- , ton can enter y'at r the Michelson Ing of migratory birds and di. '.Drive ar Irvine. verting creek water so it Rows Visitors i e encouraged,but through the marsh Instead of 9 around it. not required,to make reserva- - ►Planting about 38 acres oP -tions by calling(114)453-SSDD. native trees Inside and adjacent to the ponds. ►Restoring about 44 acres of habitat along Michelson and Carlson drives by clearing out non-native vegetation such as wild mustard weed. Sycamore, willow and cottonwood trees were planted instead. ►Creating an 8-foot buffer zone along Campus Drive to de- crease light and noise from near- by commercial and housing de- velopments. A smaller berm is planned for Michelson and Carl- son drives. Orange County Sanitation Districts Od7't- Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times fl I L) II4 :MWD Stand on Aqueduct Fees Is Rejected that MWtlow ■ Courts: A judge backs groups. The ruling could lead to a wide- only be charge theuactual cost of 'ahnwltation contained" In the 1986 ;smaller agencies that want open market in which water-rich transporting water through the MWD officials, stunned by the to pay less to transport agricultural and rural agencies sell aqueduct—not, for example, in- sweep of thejudges ruling,said they the resource directly to more cluding the cost of bringing State will not decide whether to appeal ;their Colorado River water populous regions by using the 242- Water Project water from North- until a study can be conducted on :for sale toother roU mile aqueduct built in the1930s. ern California. the decislon's economic impacc groups. The MWD,which supplies water Kay sided against the MWD and Of particular Interest will be to 16 million people in six Southern with the opponents'concept of the whether the prospect of curtailed By TONY PERRY California counties, has asserted charges. revenues will hurt the huge •TIMM[lair WRITER that under a state law encouraging The MWD had argued that let- agency's ability to sell bonds for In a blow to the historic domi- water transfers It could include In ting some groups buy water from large projects. nance of the Metropolitan Water Itscharge for using the aqueduct a the Colorado River without paying Paul Cunningham, MWD advisor District of Southern California over portion of the overall cost of main- their share of the regional system's and lawyer,said the ruling's effect raining its complex water delivery full cost was unfair to other agen- "on water transfer policies could be regional water matters. a judge system. ties and was akin to allowing some very substantial"and lead to other -Tuesday rejected the mega- Anticipating that the age of homeowners to pay only for the agencies seeking private purchase ;agency's concept of what Is fair transfers is rapidly approaching, cop patrolling their block and not deals using the MWD's facilities. •compensation for use of Its Colo- the MWD brought the lawsuit for the overall police department. Kay's decision is particularly good redo River Aqueduct. seeking validation of Its views. Kay sympathized with that view new for the Quechan and Cheme- The decision by San Francisco But other agencies opposed the but Bald his role was to decide what huevl tribes along the Colorado. Superior Court Judge Laurence suit, arguing that the MWD was lawmakers had in mind In passing Both have allotments of the •Kay represented a victory over the trying to maintain its hegemony the 1966 law encouraging water river's water that they would like MWD by the San Diego County over Colorado River water by transfers and not whether the to sell to agencies along the coast Water Authority,the Imperial lrcl- pushing the cost of using the legislation was equitable. to help the tribes avoid dependence gallon District,two Native Amerl- aqueduct so high that transfers "While [the MWD position)may on casino gambling, government can tribes along the Colorado River would be uneconomical. not be unreasonable," Kay ruled, subsidies and the vagaries of desert •and a coalition of environmental The opposing lawyers argued "It Is not In conformance with the agriculture. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 17, 1997 itICTS OFp99y yQ � o0 z z � � a plF�/NC�7 � �Ppt� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 12/17/97 Page 2 of 11 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on December 17, 1997, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT X Pat McGuigan, Chair Thomas E. Lutz NO. 1 X James M. Fe an Chair pro tem Arthur Perry X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz A Thomas R. Saltarelli I Jim Potts X I Todd Spitzer William G.Steiner DISTRICT X Norman Z. Eckenrode Chair Michael L. Maertzweiler NO.2 X Mark A. Murphy,Chair pro tem Joanne Coontz X Steve Anderson John Holmbe X Don Bankhead Chris Norb X Bruce A. Broadwater Mark Le es X John Collins James Petrikin X Barry Denes Bob Bell A Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Todd S itzer Wlliam G.Steiner X Hank Wedae Mark Schwing X I Bob Zemel Tom Dal DISTRICT X Margie L. Rice Chair James V. Evans NO. 3 X Eva Miner-Bradford Chair pro tern Paul F.Walker X Steve Anderson John Holmberg X Don Bankhead Chris Norb X George Brown Gwen Forsythe Mary Ann Jones X Tim Keenan A Brian Donahue Harry M.Dotson A Burnie Dunlap Marty Slmonoff X Mark Le es Bruce A. Broadwater X Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller X Pat MoGui an Thomas E. Lutz X Todd Spitzer William G. Steiner X Dave Sullivan I Tom Hannan X Charles E. Sylvia I Alice B. Jempsa X Bob Zemel I Tom Dal DISTRICT X Jan Debay, Chair John E. Noyes NO.ti 1 John E. Noyes,Chair pro tem X Jan Deba X Wiliam G.Steiner I Todd Spitzer DISTRICT X James M. Fe an Chair Arthur Perry NO.6 X William G.Steiner Chair pro tem Todd Spitzer X I Jan Debay I I John E. Noyes Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 12/17/97 Page 3 of 11 ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT A Thomas R. SaMarelli Chair I Jim Potts NO. 7 X Christina Shea Chair pro tern I Barry Hammond X Jan Debay hn E. Noyes X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X Pat McGui an Thomas E. Lutz X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X William G. Steiner Todd S a" DISTRICT 1 X 1 Shidev Dettloff.Chair 1 Tom Harman NO. 11 X I Dave Sullivan, Chair pro tern I Tom Harman X I Todd Spitzer I William G.Steiner DISTRICT A Burnie Dunlap,Chair Marty Simonoff NO, 13 1 X Mark Schwan Chair pro tern Hank Wedas X Mark A. Mu h Joanne Coontz X I William G. Steiner I Todd Spitzer X I Bob Zemel I Tom Dal DISTRICT I X I Christina Shea,Chair Bany Hammond NO.14 A I Thomas R. Saltarelli,Chair pro tem Jim Pods X I Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X I William G.Steiner I Todd Spitzer X I Peer A.Swan I Darryl Miller STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Chris Dahl; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy Wheatley; Terri Josway; Mike Moore; Doug Stewart; Ryal Wheeler. OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel DISTRICTS 1. 3. 6&7 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Agency District Active Director Alternate Director Cypress 3 Mary Ann Jones' Tom Carroll Costa Mesa Sanitary District 1, 6&7 James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry Midway City Sanitary District 3 Margie L. Rice Russell C. Paris Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 12/17/97 Page 4 of 11 DISTRICTS 5, 6 &7 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Thomas Cole Edwards of the City of Newport Beach from the Boards of Directors of District Nos. 5, 6 and 7, and seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows: District Active Director Alternate Director 5. 6&7 Jan Debay John E. Noyes 5 John E. Noyes Jan Debay DISTRICT 3 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file letter from the City of Cypress re appointment of Tim Keenan as Alternate Director for Mary Ann Jones for the meeting of December 17, 1997 only. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair reported there would be no committee meetings in January with the exception of the Steering Committee. He also noted there was a tentative New Directors'Workshop scheduled for January 31st. If there are few new Directors, the time may be spent on an update of the strategic plan. Chair Collins then announced that at the December SARBS meeting, several employees were presented awards. Simon Watson was named Maintenance Person of the year, Kelly Christianson was named Industrial and Hazardous Waste Person of the Year; and Chloe Dao and Vladimir Kogan received the Project of the Year award. These employees will now go on to compete against other region winners for state awards. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager recognized Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, who briefed the Directors regarding the major rainstorm of December 6. Mr. McIntyre also recognized Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, who reported on the draft 301(h)waiver permit, which was received by the Districts that day. Ms. Wheatley outlined the key points contained within the permit. She also briefly reviewed the requirements the Districts would follow prior to the permit becoming effective. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL The General Counsel referred the Directors to two memoranda included in their meeting folders that evening. The first memo was a status report regarding the Merrill Lynch litigation on the bankruptcy. Mr. Woodruff reported the bankruptcy hearing was set for the following week and most of the money recovered would be going to the school districts. The second memo was a litigation status report regarding the sewer spill incident of February 1996 and the Districts' claim against the Bayside Cove Community Association. The claim was recently tried before a jury, which, upon conclusion, awarded the Districts the full amount of its claim plus court costs. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 12/17/97 Page 5 of 11 APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts) There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 19, 1997. the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS (All Districts) MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A", "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/97 10M/97 Joint Operating Fund $1,156,262.17 $1,511.814.48 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 249,950.03 2,260,775.96 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 12,828.64 311,260.02 District No. 1 0.00 780.43 District No. 2 3,971.88 1,740.59 District No. 3 13,851.43 7.571.73 District No. 5 0.00 197,299.00 District No. 6 0.00 0.00 District No. 7 23,570.34 0.00 District No. 11 6,800.00 397.96 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 0.00 TOTALS $1 467 234 49 94.291.640.17 Directors Todd Spitzer and Mark Leyes abstained. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 10.b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of Steering Committee, re the December 17, 1997 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 19, 1997 to be filed. 10.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Motion was amended to approve participation of Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, in the Water Environment Federation's Technical Conference, being held in March 1998, in Singapore,Asia; and approve reimbursement for transportation, lodging, meals and incidental expenses in accordance with Districts' established expense reimbursement policies. Directors Don Bankhead, Mark Leyes, Mark A. Murphy, Todd Spitzer, William G. Steiner, Peer A. Swan and Bob Zemel opposed the motion. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 12/17/97 Page 6 of 11 11.b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Pal McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the December 3, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held December 3, 1997 to be filed. 11.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Pima Gro for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in a form approved by General Counsel. 11.d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to enter into an amended agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in a form approved by General Counsel. 12.b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Joint Chair John Collins due to the absence of the Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the December 4, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held December 4, 1997 to be filed. 12.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and 132-35-5 with Advance Constructors, Inc. For Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site and Security Improvements in the amount of$71,557. 12.d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Job No. P1-36-2 with Margate Construction, Inc. For Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 in the amount of$69,628. 12.e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve an increase in authorized funds of$188,000, bringing the project total to$1,208,400 to cover all anticipated costs required to complete construction of the Compressed Natural Gas(CNG) Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid). Director Mark Schwing opposed the motion. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 12/17/97 Page 7 of 11 12.f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. 97-37, as amended, Establishing Policies and Procedures for Selection and Procurement of Professional Engineering, Architectural, Environmental, Land Surveying and Construction Management Services; Approval of Plans and Specifications; Approval of Construction Change Orders, and repealing Resolution Nos. 90-43, 94-110, and 95-9. Directors Bruce Broadwater, Mark Leyes, Todd Spitzer and Bob Zemel opposed the motion. 13.b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the December 10, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held December 10, 1997 to be filed. 13.c. MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 1997. 13.d. MOVED, SECONDED,AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and approve letter dated November 6, 1997 from Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) requesting a waiver of late payment interest charges assessed by Districts' staff for treatment plant capacity. 13.e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adoption of a formal borrowing and lending program by the Boards of Directors of the individual Districts in order to provide for inter-District loans, with interest, while the Strategic Plan is being completed and a long-term financial plan is being prepared. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11 & 13 14. Public hearing relative to the following proposed Ordinances of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 of Orange County, California, amending ordinances relative to exemptions, rebates and refunds of sanitary sewer service charges: Amending District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 1 134 133 2 224 223 3 327 326 5 535 516 6 630 629 7 737 736 11 1126 1125 13 1319 1303 OPEN HEARING: The Joint Chair declared the hearing opened at 8:20 p.m. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 12/17/97 Page B of 11 REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL: General Counsel Thomas Woodruff reported this was a second reading of proposal ordinance relations to exemptions, rebates and refunds of sewer service charges. CLOSE HEARING: The Joint Chair declared the hearing closed at 9:22 p.m. DISTRICT 1 Ordinance No. 134,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California,Amending Ordinance No. 133 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 134 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance. It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 134: AYES: Pat McGuigan, Chair, James M. Ferryman; Mark A. Murphy; Todd Spitzer NOES: None ABSENT: Thomas R. Saltarelli DISTRICT 2 Ordinance No. 224, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 223 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 224 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance. It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 224: AYES: Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair, Steve Anderson; Don Bankhead; Bruce Broadwater, John Collins; Barry Denes; Pat McGuigan; Mark A. Murphy; Todd Spitzer, Hank Wedaa; Bob Zemel NOES: None ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 12/17/97 Page 9 of 11 DISTRICT 3 Ordinance No. 327, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 326 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 327 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance. It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 327: AYES: Margie Rice, Chair, Steve Anderson; Don Bankhead; Eva M. Bradford; George Brown; John Collins; Tim Keenan; Mark Leyes; Patsy Marshall; Pat McGuigan; Todd Spitzer, Dave Sullivan; Charles E. Sylvia; Bob Zemel NOES: None ABSENT: Brian Donahue; Bumie Dunlap DISTRICT 5 Ordinance No. 535, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 535 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance. It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 535: AYES: Jan Debay, Chair,William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: None DISTRICT 6 Ordinance No. 630, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 629 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 630 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance. It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 630: AYES: James M. Ferryman, Chair, Jan Debay; William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: None Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 12/17/97 Page 10 of 11 DISTRICT 7 Ordinance No. 737, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 736 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 737 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance. It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 737: AYES: Christina Shea, Chair pro tem; Jan Debay; James M. Ferryman; Pat McGuigan; Mark A. Murphy;William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSENT: Thomas R. Saltarelli DISTRICT 11 Ordinance No. 1126, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1125 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: A motion was made, seconded and unanimously monied to read Ordinance No. 1126 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance. It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 1126: AYES: Shirley Dettloff, Chair, Todd Spitzer, Dave Sullivan NOES: None ABSENT: None DISTRICT 13 Ordinance No. 1319, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 1319 by ties only, and waive reading of entire ordinance. It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 1319: AYES: Mark Schwing, Chair pro tem; Mark A. Murphy; William G. Steiner, Bob Zemel NOES: None ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 12/17/97 Page 11 of 11 DISTRICT 2 15.a. DRAFT SELECTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: The Chair ordered the Selection Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 3, 1997 to be filed. 15.b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Selection Committee certification and approve Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver to design and prepare the construction documents for Replacement of Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate, Contract No. 2-40, in an amount not to exceed $54,981.00. ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:26 p.m. AW4_4- Secretary of Boa of Directors of County Sani ti n Di cts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 1 Prdon\datal\wp.&a�dmWSSWMT121797.doc County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County - Claims Paid 10115/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Descdption 7087 Barclays Bank PLC $93,620.10 Loc Quarterly Fees 7088 Bic Oro Division $27,466.08 Residuals Removal MO 4-26.95 7089 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $87,Bo0A0 Engineering Services 7090 Catollo Engineers $51.514.03 Engineering Servicas J-33.2 7091 Dell Marketing L.P. $46,011.01 Computers 7092 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $78,277.37 Naulural Gas 7093 General Physics Corp $64.000.00 Professional Services 7094 J.D.Edwards Warts Solutions $87,39D.00 Software License Fees MO 7-2448 7095 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. $68.295.64 Ferric Cloride MO 9.27-95 7096 Maim Health Act Financial $132.225.61 Mega Premium 7097 Mike Pdlch&Sons $104.683.09 Construction 3-35-R 7098 Orange County Wholesale Electric $30.452.54 Instrument Supplies 7099 Science Applications Ing.,Cc $45.398.50 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8.94 7100 Tub Ra tch/Magan Farms $45,199.63 Residuals Removal 7101 A T&T-Magacam Service $2,595.15 Lang Distance Telephone Services 7102 AT&T-Cellular CR&R $5.72 Long Distance Telephone Services 7103 Air Uqulde America Corporation $1,627.59 Specialty Gases 7104 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. $9,180.30 Manhole Frames&Covers 7105 American Metal Bearing Company $110.36 Credit Note Reimbursement 7106 American Water Works Assoc. $428.00 Conference Registration 7107 Anabolic Inc. $210.00 Crecift Note Reimbursement Y, 7108 Anthony Peal Control,Inc. $395.00 Service Agreement rt 7109 Apco Valve And Pdmer Corporation $703.69 Valve Pads 3v 7110 Appleone Employment Service $3.000.81 Temporary Employment Services F, 7111 Awards&Trophies By Bea $70.90 Plaques 7112 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $200.00 Telephone Installation 7113 Battery Specialtes $4.728.20 Batteries 7114 Sawa . $122.86 Valve Pads 7115 Black Box Corporation $331.41 Computer Pads 7116 Bog Delivery $107.00 Freight 7117 Boulevard Development Inc. $420.05 Refundable Annexation Fee 7118 Boyle Engineering Corporation $21.414.41 Engineering Services 7.71 7119 Boyle Engineedng Corporation $12,312.63 Engineering Services 3-35 7120 Brown And Caldwell $3.646.88 Engineering Services P2-35-3,P2-35-3 7121 BNI Building News $141.06 Publications 7122 Calalympic Safety $1,926.43 Safely Supplies 7123 Cellrol,Inc. $4,294.02 Hardware 7124 Cashcu,Inc. $78.39 Valve Pads 7125 City of seal Beach $124.40 Water use 7126 The City Associates,Inc. $3.437.50 Hearing Officer Services 7127 Barbara A.Collins $354.06 Expense Relmb. 7128 Compucom 12,215.26 Software 7129 Compuse,Inc. $415.30 Electronic&Computer Supplies 7130 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $481.95 Electronic Parts 7131 Construction Fabricators Inc. $5.921.16 Construction Services 7132 Continental-McLaughlin $318.76 Tools County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/15/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Descnp0on 7133 Cooper Cameron Corporation 5203.64 Engine Parts 7134 Corporate Express $197.70 Office Supplies 7135 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. $1,52&33 Mechanical Supplies 7136 County of Orange $169.00 Training Registration 7137 County of Orange E720.00 Administrative Fees 7138 CountyofOmnge E6,800.00 Replenish DIV. 11 Interest B Sinking Fund 7139 County Clerk $3&00 Dammam Hardling Fee 7140 County Wholesale Electric Co. $2.006.20 Electric Parts 7141 CPI-The Alternative Supplier $1,631.01 Lab Supplies 7142 CS Company $2,387.96 Plumbing Supplies 7143 CWEA $875.00 Conference Registrations 7144 D'Vals Sales Company $10.82 Fittings 7145 Daly Pilot 568.75 Notices&Ads 7146 Del Mar Analytical $380.00 BlosoOds Analysis 7147 Dover Elevator Company 51,067.63 Elevator Maintenance 7148 Dunkel Bros.Machinery Moving $600.00 Freight 7149 DGA Consultants,Inc. $1.764.16 Engineering Services 2-34R 7150 Eberhard Equipment $1.682.22 Equipment Repair 7151 EcoAnaysis,Inc. 540.00 Consulting Services 7152 Enchanter,Inc. $7.000.00 Ocean MonBOBng MO 524-95 7153 Enter IRD International $2.189.10 Equipment Repair 71M Executive Enterprises $1,495.00 Seminar Registration 7155 Federal Express $503.25 Air Freight rr 7156 Filter Supply Company $666.95 Fibers yj 7157 Fisher Scientific $432.40 Lab Supplies ^1 7158 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 5266.00 Concrete Cutting 7159 Flo-Systems,Inc. $7.989.82 Pump Parts 7160 ForOa Benefits Insurance Company $17.453.11 Insurance Premiums Oct 97 7151 Fountain Valley Florist $89A3 Funeral Anangement For Richard Randall 7162 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $646.50 Paint Supplies 7163 Franklin Quest Co. $976.50 Office Supplies 7164 Fys Electronics $5.188.96 Electronic&Computer Supplies 7165 City of Fullerton $326.16 Water Use 7166 Gallade Chemical Inc. $346.20 Chemicals 7167 The Gas Company $2,664.91 Natural Gas 7168 Gerald S.Schaan $1.637.50 Training Consultant 7169 Graphic Distributors $102.22 Photographic Supplies 7170 Graling Pacific Inc. $2,383.43 Fiberglass Grating 7171 The Great American Printing Cc $145.43 Priding 7172 EST,Inc./Micro City $8.150.79 Office Supplies 7173 Harold Primness Ica $84.00 Ice For Samples 7174 High-Polnl Randal E1,081.00 Consulting Services 7175 Hoerbiger Service Inc $26.52 Compressor Pads 7176 Hoare Depot $568.26 Small Hardware 7177 Horiba Instruments Inc $907.98 Electric Pars 7178 Ctty of Huntington Beach $21.25 Water Use County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/15/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7179 Hydrate[ $4.476.69 Luba Oil 7180 Industrial Hearing&Pulmonary $2,485.00 Audlomemc&Pulmonary Testing Of Employees 7181 Industrial Threaded Products, $335.34 Connectors 7182 Inorganic Ventures,Inc $32&31 Lab Supplies 7183 Interstate Battery Systems $1.253.24 Baeeries 7184 Irvine Photo Graphics $321A8 Photographic Supplies 7185 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $1,429.82 Instrument Pads 7186 J.D.Edwards $2,800.00 Training Registration 7187 J.P.Nissen Co $56.32 Ofics Supplies 7188 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $2,333.07 Construction Services 7189 Jaya Catering $2,321.15 Directors Meeting Expense 7190 Johnstone Supply $295.50 Electric Pads 7191 J2 Printing Services $657.28 Printing 7192 Knox Industrial Supplies $253.94 Tools 7193 LA Cellular Telephone Company $4,855.59 Cellular Telephone Service 7194 La Palma Car Wash $1.228.11 Truck Wash Tickets 7195 Lab Safety Suppy,lnc. $2,941.24 Safety Supplies 7196 Lab Systems $6,700.00 Installation Integration Services 7197 Lebware Inc. $600.00 Training Registration 7198 Lee&Ro Inc $19.10.14 Engineering Services 7199 Lessons in Leadership $299.00 Seminar Registration 7200 Deborah L.United $730.20 Expense Reimb. rt 7201 Local Agency Formation Commission $1,950.00 Processing Fee q 7202 LA Cellular Telephone Company $170.62 Telephone Equipment tN 7203 Maintenance Products,Inc. $6,73421 Mechanical Supplies 7204 Maintenance Technology Corp. $572.05 Tools 7205 Me Fadden-Dale Hardware Co. $69.63 Coolant 7208 McKenna Engineering&Equipment $M.30 Valve Parts 7207 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. $743.85 Tools 7208 Measurement Variables,Inc. $681.96 Filters 7209 Medlin Controls Co. $721.12 Instrument Supplies 7210 Meeting Planners Plus $473,19 Professional Services 7211 Mierobae Laboratories,Inc. $4,140.00 Gas Analysis 7212 Microbe Masters $1,807.92 Advanced Bio Cultures 7213 Midway Mfg&Machining Cc $1,030.00 Mechanical Repairs 7214 Mission Abrasive Supplies $598.01 Safety Supplies 7215 Mission Uniform Service $2,164.22 Uniform Rentals 7216 Moreland&Associates $11,543.32 Audlting Services MO 341-95 7217 MotoPhoto $59.05 Photographic Supplies 7218 National Technical Information $35.50 Publication 7219 National Technology Transfer $595.00 Seminar Registration 7220 Neal Supply Company $128.22 Plumbing Supplies 7221 Network Catalyst $5.783.31 Consultant 7222 New Horizons Computer Learning $5,398.00 On-site Training 7223 Newark Electronics $276.27 Instrument Parts 7224 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. $1.261.50 Lubricants/Diesel Fuel County Sanitation Distnms Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/15/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7225 The Norm Companies $100.55 Mail Delivery Service 7226 Occupational Vision Services $529.18 Safety Glasses 7227 Office Depot Business SeMms $1,987.96 Office Supplies 7228 Omega Corporation $1.796.81 Lob Supplies 7229 On Technology Corporation $2,922.75 Software Upgrades 7230 Orange County Business Council $20.00 Workshop Registration 7231 Orange County Farm Supply $345.12 Chemicals 7232 Orange Courier $206.10 Coudersarvims 7233 Orange Valve&Fitting Company $194.33 Fittings 7234 Oxygen Service Company $2,063.57 Specialty Gases 7235 OI Coporellon $638.96 Lab Supplies 7236 P.L.Hawn Company Inc. $134.35 Electric Supplies 7237 Pacific Bell $19.35 Telephone Services 7238 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2,808.80 Plumbing Supplies 7239 Pacific Pert and Controls,Inc $13.210.45 Instrument Parts 7240 Pacific Publishers $108.18 Publication 7241 Panmouse Tire,Inc. $1,946.12 Tires 7242 Parkson Corporation $400.19 Freight 7243 Parts Unlimited $975.70 Truck Pens 7244 Peak Technologies $130.00 Wax/Resin Ribbons 7245 Premier Fastener Company $311.27 Tools 7246 Presidium.Inc. $2.083.33 Workers Comp Claim Administration. N 7247 Progressive Business Publication $23D00 Subscriptions 7 7248 Public Officials for Water&Environmental Reform $310.00 Conference Registration I 7249 Putzmai der,Inc. $62.91 Pump Pads 7250 PC Connection,Inc. $8200 Computer Parts 7261 Quality Compressor,Inc. $1,562.38 Compressor 7252 R&J Sheet Metal, Inc. $2,062.00 Metal 7253 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. SIS76.83 Electric Parts 7254 Red Wing Shoes $309.46 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 7255 Relsh Marina Studies,Inc. $460.00 Oman Monitoring 7256 Rellastar $8.288.00 Ufa Insurance Premium 7257 Rellastar Bankers Security Life Insurance $4,843.27 Voluntary Life Insurance Premium 7258 RM Controls $79.20 Office Supplies 7259 Sears $68.55 Office Supplies 7260 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc. 5449.64 Tools 7261 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $1.209.71 Tools/Hardware 7262 SigmaAMrich,Inc. $289.21 Lab Supplies 7263 Sloen Electric Company $11,600.00 Motor Repairs 7264 Sm6h Pipe&Supply Inc $253.63 Plumbing Supplies 7265 So.Col.Coalition for Pollution Prevention $250.00 Conference Registration 7266 Society for Human Resource Man $610.00 Seminar Registration 7267 Society of Env.Toxicology&Chemistry $670.00 Meeting Registration 7288 Som-Lynch Corp. $87.24 Janitorial Services 7269 South Coast Air Duality Mngt. $171 SD Permit Fees 7270 South Croat Air Quality Mgmt. $9.492.60 Permit Fees County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/15197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7271 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $11.170.10 Permit Fees 7272 South Coast Air Quality Mgml. $171 90 Permit Fees 7273 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $5,15790 Permit Fees 7274 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $17790 Perna Fees 7275 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $171 90 Permit Fees 7276 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $25.00 Permit Fees 7277 South Coast Water $160.00 Lab Supplies 7278 Southern California Air Conditioning Distributors $1,384,59 Heat Pump 7279 Stalehlet $98.00 Seminar Registration 7280 Sleding Ad $14.76 Ad Supplies 7281 Steven Enterprises,Inc. $708A2 Plotter Supplies 7282 Strata International,Inc. $957.93 Chemicals 7283 Summit Steel $2,472.22 Metal 7254 Sunset Ford $144.00 Trick Parts 7285 Sunset Industrial Pads $50M Hose 7286 Superb One-Hour Photo $21d6 Photographic Services 7287 The Holman Group $775.32 EAP Premium Od 97 7288 Thermo Jarrell Ash Baird $174.45 Pump Pads 7289 Thompson Industrial Supply.Ina $226.37 Mechanical Pane 7290 Transcal $1.008.14 Electrical Pads 7291 Trsplal Plus Nursery,Inc. $3,973.84 Contract Greur lskeeping MO 5.11-94 7292 Trick 8 Auto Supply,Inc. $284.Ob Track Parts rh 7293 Truesdall Laboratories,Inc. $2.722.00 Lab Services 7294 Ultra Scientific $220.00 Lab Supplies I 7295 United Parcel Service $48.85 Parcel Services Ln 7285 Urban Water Institute,Inc. $176.00 Membership 7297 Vako Instruments Co.Inc. $283.94 Lab Supplies 7298 Valley CBIes Supply Company $2.938.58 Plumbing Supplies 7289 Veme§Plumbing $40.00 Plumbing Services 7300 Vlllalobos B Associates $11,951.23 Engineering Services 7301 VWR Scientific Products $5,628.42 Lab Supplies 7302 The Wackenhut Corporation $6,020.86 Contract Service-Security Guards 7303 Waste Markets $4.464.05 Residuals Removal MO 3.27-96 7304 Water Environment Federation $1.281.50 Seminar Registration 7305 Waters Corporation $1,225.34 Service Agreement 7305 Wayne Electric Go. $362.04 Badlands 7307 Western States Chemical Inc. $17,872.16 Caustic Soda Me 8.23-95 7308 Westinghouse Electric Corporation $23,000.00 Electrical Engineering Services 7309 Wdeg Scientific $217.17 Lab Supplies 7310 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $3,618.17 Professional Services 7311 WEHA Publishing $74.00 Publication 7312 WIN Grainger Inc. $661.59 Compressor Pads 7313 %emu Corporation $3.455.58 Copler Leases 7314 Yellow Springs Instrument Co., $90.39 Lab Supplies 7315 Blake Anderson $1,0117.40 Expense Rehab. 7316 Nicholas J.Adhered; $314.92 Expense Relmb. County Sanitation Disidds Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/15/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7317 Beet Buy and Absolon Decestro $2,648.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 7318 Dean M.Carries $195.60 Expense Reims. 7319 Patrick M.Carillo $2.802.58 Employee Computer Loan Program 7320 George A.Charette $198.57 Expense Reims. 7321 Peter Chaffs $224.31 Expanse Reims. 7322 Donald R.Cleveland $365.07 Expense Reimb. 7323 James E.Colston $1,929.15 Employee Computer Loan Program 7324 Ronald L.Devitt.Jr $155.55 Expense Reimb. 7325 Darrell S.Ennis $196.81 Expense Reimb. 7326 Timothy D.Foley $167.75 Expanse Relents. 7327 Tom E.Gavromkl $213.85 Expense Reimb. 7328 W.Doug Hauser $117.99 Expense Reimb, 7329 Roy A.Handy $355.20 Expense Reimb. 7330 Larry E.Lazorek $351,82 Expense Palms. 7331 Cherie M.Lelsten $174,26 Expense Reimb. 7332 Noeno C.Loopando $718,45 Expense Reimb. 7333 Michael E.McCarthy $230A6 Expense Rehmb. 7334 Michael J.McCusker $467.70 Expense Reimb. 7335 Scott M.Mebust $355.10 Expense Reimb. 7336 John Mlrkovich $139.80 Expense Reimb. 7337 Paul A.Mitchell $3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program Y_ 7338 Nylon Computer and Mike MCKusker $1,813.71 Employee Computer Loan Program re 7339 Joseph W.Palk,Jr. $354.63 Expense Reimb. q 7340 Michael Reldeler $174.26 Expense Rehmb. m 7341 Royal Computer and Ehem Worse $2,724.75 Employee Computer Loan Program 7342 Joe D.Sanderson 8425.49 Expense Reimb. 7343 Rudolf Schaap $175.80 Expense Reimb. 7344 James 0.Tlnlle $351.82 Expense Palms. 7345 Mitchell J.Trhbimm,lc l $381.82 Expense Reimb. 7346 Bobby L.Unsell $168.20 Expense Reimb. 7347 Slmon L.Watson $30.00 Expense Reimb. 7348 Nancy J.Wheatley $192.10 Expanse Reimb, 7349 James L.Wybonga $230.16 Expense Reimb. 7350 Michael I.Zedek $218.17 Expense Reimb. 7351 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County $12,828.64 Workers Camp Reimb, 7352 County sanitation Districts of orange county $1,016.63 Petty Cash Reimb. 7353 National Research Coundl Canada $325.00 Publications 7354 County Clerk $36.00 Permit Fees 7355 Local Agency Formation Commission $950.00 Permit Fees 7356 Science Applications Intl.,Cc $10,918.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 7357 Jana H.Train $173.17 Expense Reimb. 7358 Daniel E.Tunnldi f $321.92 Expense Rehab. Total Claims Paid 10115A)7 $1,467,234.49 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County e Claims Paid 10/15/97 Summary Amount District No.2 $3,971.80 District No.3 $13.851.43 Distr at No.7 $23,570.34 District No.11 $8,800.00 CORP $249,950.03 Self Insurance Funds $12,828.64 Joint Opereeore $1.156,262.17 $1,067,230./9 F9 r rt 0s J County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/29/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Descripgon 7378 Advance Constructors Inc $445,311.90 Construction J-341,P2-3% 7379 Air Products and Chemicals,Inc. $45.013.56 O&M Agreement Ozy Gen.Syst.MO 841-89 7380 Alrpol Construction,Inc. $255,657.56 Construction PI-51R 7381 Biu Gen Division $25,202.68 Residuals Removal MO 4.26-95 7382 Camllo Engineers $48,261.05 Engineering Services PI-38,P243.3 7383 Dail Marketing L.P. 542,130.T Computers 7384 FMC Carpomtlon-Chemical Products $117,620.26 Hydrogen Peroxide MO 9.14.94 7385 J.D.Edwards World Solutions $30.518.45 Software license Fees MO 7-24.96 7385 Ke nuon Pacific,Ina. 5103,964.61 Fanlc Chloride MO9-27-95 7387 Labwans Inc $53.650.00 Lab Information Mgmt System Software 73BB Margate Construction Inc. $1,153.233.53 Construction PI-36-2,P141,P143 7389 Mac Analytical System $43,424.00 Professional Services 7390 Orange County Water District $47,251.20 GAP Water Use MO6-&93 7391 Paclflcere of Ca $39,017.87 Medical Insurance Premium 7392 Pascal$Ludwig,Inc. $228.355.00 Construction J-33.2 7383 Pima Gro Systems Inc $85.198.65 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 7394 Polypum,Inc.Wor Polydyne,Inc. $42.794.87 Cetienlc Potynrer MO 3.11-92 7395 Remedy $27.449.28 Temporary Employment Services 1396 Sverdrup Chdl,Ina $438.016.60 Construction P2-354 7397 Tula Ranch/Magan Fames $38,444.09 Residuals Removal 7398 Western Stales Chemical Inc $31. 02.32 Caustic Soda Me 8-23-95 7399 Woodruff,Spradlm B Smart $66.214.46 Legal Services MO 7-26.95 M 7400 American Telephone 8 Telegraph-Cellular OR 8 R $4.38 Long Distance Telephone Services b] 7401 American Telephone 8 Telegraph-Cellular OR 8 R $89.02 Long Distance Telephone Services 7402 A-Pius Systems $748.27 Notices 8 Ads 7403 Air Uqukle America Corporation E288.85 Specialty Gasses 7404 Aladdin House $57.32 Mini Blinds 7405 Afts-Robbins.Inc. $293.16 Instrument Supplies 7406 Amedan Media Inc. $1,688.45 Training Publications 7407 Anlater Inc. $1,625.05 Computer Supplies 7408 Appleone Employment Service $1,131.60 Temporary Employment Services 7409 Applied Industrial Technology $258.24 Pump Pads 7410 Airs Disposal Service,Inc. $310.40 Toxic Waste Removal 7411 Asbury Environmental Services $35.00 Waste Oil Removal 7412 Ashme $416.00 Publications 7413 Assoc of Metropolitan Sewerego $590.00 Workshop Registration 7414 Awards B Trophies By Bea $34.98 Plaques 7415 ABM Business Machines,Inc. $119.93 Office Supplies 7416 AM Leonard $91.48 Live Animal Traps 7417 AMA/Kaye Productivity Center $159.00 Seminar Registration 7418 AWSI $249.00 D.O.T.Training Program 7419 Bailey Fischer S Porter Company $9.23 Chlorination Supplies 7420 Bank of America $313.87 Banking Services 7421 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $1.916.69 Telephone Installation 7422 Battery Speciakles 5417.21 Bafteres 7423 Ben Meadows Company,Inc. $90.31 Tool. County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/29197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7424 Seman Press $115.54 Publication 7425 Black Progress Revlew, $395.00 Ads&Notices 7426 Bolsa Radiator Semice $172.40 Truck Repairs 7427 Bob Delivery $111.00 Freight 742E Borland International $1.095.76 Computer Parts 7429 Boyle Engineering Corporation $1,059.50 Engineering Services 7.18 7430 Brenner-Fledler&Assoc Inc $384.59 Generators 7431 Budget Janaodal,Inc. $3.605.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94 7432 California Auto Refrigeration $83.73 Refrigerator Parts 7433 California Automatic Gate $1,017.51 Service Agreement 7434 California Comfort Vans $269.38 Van Parts 7435 Calolympic Safety $2,406.70 Safety Supplies 7436 CaBrol,Inc. $1.248.18 Hardware 7437 Canus Corporation $513.66 Fiber Optic Cable 7438 Card Warren It Co. $300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 7439 Carleton Engineers&Consultants $15.75 Engineering Services-Air Quality 7440 Catapult lnc $4.000.00 On-Site Training 7441 Cemrepoirda Commercial Int. $2.181.52 Office Fum0ure 7442 Century Safety $720.26 Safety Supplies 7443 The Cobb Group $59.00 Subsaip6en 7444 Compuserve Incorporated $927.52 Computer Services t„ 7445 Computers America,Inc. $1,587.15 Computer Supplies R�e 7446 Compuxpress and Michas Stromgren $1,3116.83 Employee Computer Loan Program l 7447 Compuxpress and Tim Colamomm $2.021.05 Employee Computer Loan Program N 7448 Connell GM Pads $241.99 Truck Parts 7449 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $97.65 Electric Pads 7450 Cooper Cameron Corporation $4,232.02 Engine Pads 7451 Copelco Capital,Inc. $1.432.00 Color Copier Lease 7452 Corporate Express $1,345.95 Office Supplies 7453 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. $1,447.03 Mechanical Supplies 7454 County Sanitation District of OC $59.45 Petty Cash Reimb. 7455 County Wholesale Electric Co. $4,930.83 Electric Pads 7456 Crane Pro Services $207.00 Crane Parts 7457 California Assoicialian Of Sanitation Agencies $25.00 Conference Registration 7458 CH2MHI9 $5.458.59 Professional Services 7459 Confidential Management Services $5,526.04 Professional Services 7460 CRC Press,Inc. $210.11 Lab Supplies 7461 CS Company $3,704.18 Plumbing Supplies 7462 CWEA $715.00 Seminar Registdion 7463 Cristopher D.Dahl $1.755.91 Expense Reimb. 7464 Del Mar Analytical $1.788.00 Blosolids Analysis 7465 Diamond H Recognition $38.02 Service Awards 7466 Digital Equipment Corporation $5.665.00 Computer 7467 DGA Consultants,Inc. $1,855.00 Engineering Services MO 6.8-94 7468 DME,Inc. $1.970.40 Compressor Pads 7469 Eagle Distribution $867.13 Track Parts County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/29/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7470 Eberhard Equipment $187.44 Tractor Repair 7471 Edwards High Vacuum International $907.17 Lab Supplies 7472 Egghead Software $65.83 Software 7473 Eledm Bond,Inc. $4,716.76 Equipment Repair 7474 Electrorack Products Co.,Inc. $502.59 Permit Fee Refund 7475 Emergency Management Network $2.630.00 CPR/First Aid Training 7476 Enchanter,Inc. $4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring NO5-24-95 7477 Enterprise Rent-A-Car $1,030.26 Uabilay Claim Settlement 7478 Envision of Irvine and Terry Matthews $2.125.69 Employee Computer Loan Program 7479 Expmien $117.92 Orange County Property Info Lease on CD Rom 748D Express Paper B Graphics Store $211.62 Paper 7481 ENS Resources,Inc. $6.065.46 Professional Services 7482 Fairbanks Scales,Inc. $480.00 Service Agreement 7453 Fibedron $711.75 Fiber Optic Cable 7404 Flltedine Corporation $800.D4 Fifters 7465 Fleming Engineering,Inc $4,246.11 Sewer Repair 7466 Flickinger Company $545.03 Pump Pads 7487 Flo-Systems,Inc. $3.014.53 Pump Pads 7488 Forked Engineering 8 Surveying $3,960.00 Engineering Services MO 15,25-97 7489 Foss Environmental $46.45 Freight 7490 Fountain Valley Camera $22709 Photo Supplies 7491 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $822.30 Paint Supplies r'. 7492 Franklin Guest $536.00 Seminar Registration 7493 Franklin Ouest Go. $98.64 Office Supplies 7494 Fry's Electronics $730.00 Electronic B Computer Supplies w 7495 Fys Electronics and Steve Pelletier $2,908.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 7498 Gallade Chemical Inc. $395.66 Chemicals 7497 Gerraft-Callahan Company $113.14 Chemicals 7498 Gartner Group Inc. $10,775.00 Software 7499 Galas Fiberglass Installers $12,504.12 Equipment Repair 7500 General Binding Corporation $1.007.99 Office Machine Repairs 7501 GTE Cal6omfa $9,953.80 Telephone Services 7502 Gierllch-Mitchell,Inc. $3.313.25 Pump Pads 7503 Government Finance Officers Asssoc. $65.00 Agency Membership 7504 Graphic Distributors $853.92 Photographic Supplies 7505 Gressel,STI $6.160.47 Engine Pads 75M The Great American Printing Cc $525.47 Printing 7507 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $1,039.84 Janitorial Supplies 7508 Haldeman Inc. $170.09 Pump Parts 7609 Harold Primrose Ice $80.00 ice For Samples 7510 Herrington Industrial Plastics $7.373.78 Plumbing Supplies 7511 Hatch$Kirk Inc. $4.111.19 Tmtlr Pads 7512 Haulaway Storage Containers $1,658.00 Container Rentals 7513 Here's Blackforest Bakery 8 Dail $24.90 Diredor5 Meeting Expense 7514 Heresite Protective Coatings $157.21 Protective Coaling Spray 7515 HswleBFarkmd $286.39 Service Agreement County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County y - Claims Paid 10/29/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7516 HIBI Inc $1,413.65 Tools 7517 Holmes It Narver Inc $8,180.54 Engineering Services 7518 Linde L.Holmes $2,408.25 Hearing Officer 7519 Home Depot $346.07 Small Hardware 7520 Hodba Instruments Inc $907.86 Electric Paris 7521 Huntington Pool&Spa Supply $355.52 Pump 7522 MACH Company $135.00 Water Testing Chemicals 7523 Industrial Steam $4,435.08 Pumps 7524 Industrial Threaded Products $3.968.22 Connectors 7525 Information Resources $1,485.00 Personnel Services 7628 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $159.56 Lab Supplies 7527 Interstate Battery Systems $831.24 Batteries 7528 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $52.66 Water Use 7529 IBM Corporation-Way $648.00 Service Contract 7530 IDE%%Distribution Corp. $180.60 Lab Supplies 7531 IPCO Safety-Ca $580.11 Safety Supplies 7532 ISA Publications $735.00 Subscription 7533 J.O.Tucker and Son,Inc. $1.073.98 Inslrumenl Parts 7534 J.P.Morgan Securities $22,947.12 COP Remarketing Agreement MO 4-2G95 7535 Jamison Engineering,Inc $6.963.12 Constmdlon Services 7536 Janice E.Mcinally,MFCC $1,597.00 Professional Services-liAP 7537 Jays Cafedng $975.21 Directors'Meeting Expense 7538 Johnstone Supply $498.70 Electric Parts tp 7539 JWC Environmental $11,247.16 Service Agreement 7540 Keiser Foundation Health Plan $22,328.49 Medical Insurance Premium 7541 Kerrie Johnson $132.47 Claim Settlement 7542 Kewaunee Sdenliflc Corporation $3,215.48 Office Furniture 7643 Kimmerle Bros.,Inc $17.76 Mechanical Pads 7544 Knowledge Point $1,200.00 On-She Training 7545 Knox Industrial Supplies $3,495.72 Tools 7546 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. $117.72 Safety Supplies 7547 Laldlew Environmental Svcs $8.440.54 Hazardous Material Disposal 7548 LasarAll Corpandlon $2.521.53 Service Agreement 7549 Unbent.Cassidy&Frierson $6.600.00 Professional Services 7550 Limbo Vision $118.53 Photographic Services 7551 Maintenance Products,Inc. $7.773.00 Mechanical Supplies 7552 Malntenanace Technology Corp. $194.76 Tools 7553 Managing Automaton Software Guides $10.00 Publication 7554 Mar Vac Electronics $239.86 Instrument Supplies 7655 Marry Rothenberg $150.00 Professional Services 7656 Masurre Company $915.55 Safety Supplies 7567 Medlin Controls Co. $1,344.87 Instrument Supplies 7558 Mercury Insurance Group $569.73 Claim Settlement 7559 Mess Mulder $100.47 Truck Paris 7560 Milo Center and Terry Matthew 3482.94 Employee Computer Loan Program 7551 Mid-West Associates $5,397.66 Pump Parts County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 1029/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7562 Midway Mfg B Machining Cc 98,748.W Mechanical Repairs 7563 Millbonics Inc $911.71 Electrie Supplies 7664 Mission Uniform Service $2,187.39 Uniform Rentals 7585 Mobile Modular Management Corp 6258.60 Office Trailer Lease 76M Montgomery Watson $1,148.05 Professlonal Services M02.26-97 7567 Motorola $527.62 Instrument Parts 7568 MotoPhato $18.04 Photographic Services 7569 MPS Photographic Services,Inc 3214.67 Photographic Services 7570 Mina Safety Appliances Company $717.77 Electric Supplies 7571 National Assoc of Stale Purch.Officials 853.45 Publication 7572 National Plant Services.Inc. $3.330.00 Vacuum Truck Services 7573 National Safety Council $500.00 Membership 7574 Natlink Ltd. $4,459.01 Radio System 7575 Network Catalyst $3.752.38 Fiber Opttc Cable 7576 New Horizons Computer Learning $6,000.00 On-Sire Training 7577 Newark Electronics $32.57 Instrument Parts 7678 Nearest,Inc. $1.238.00 Permit Fees 7579 Nexcom and Terry Matthews $289.98 Employee Computer Loan Program 7580 The Norco Companies $103.00 Mail Delivery Service 7581 Numatic Engineering $81.43 Valve Pads 7582 Office Depot Business Services $2.007.99 Office Supplies 7583 Oracle Corporation $23,406.53 License Fees&Consulting Services M 7584 Orange County Red Cross $120.00 Safety Training to 7585 Orange County Wholesale Electric 3668.23 Instrument Supplies 1 7586 Orange Valve 8 Filling Company $2.104.82 Fittings rr 7587 Orkin,Co. $7.801.75 Pump Pads 7585 Orrick,Herrington 8 Sutcliffe $4.000.00 Professional Services-Financial Program 7589 Oxygen Service Company $1,789.87 Specialty Gases 7590 DAG $1,049.76 Software llcense 7591 P.L.Hawn Company Inc. 851.18 Electric Supplies 7592 Pacific Bell $1.309.07 Telephone Services 7593 Pacific Mechanical Supply $5,325.66 Plumbing Supplies 75N Pacific Pans and Controls,Inc. $16.751.70 Instrument Pads 7595 Pads Janitorial Supplies $293.51 Janitorial Supplies 7596 Pagenet $695.69 Rental Equipment 7597 Panel Concepts,Inc. $780.43 Permit Fee Refund 7598 Padhouse Tim,Inc. $530.80 Ties 7598 Patriot Video Productions $310.91 Video Taping Services 7600 Paulus Engineering,Inc. $7,922.00 Conduction 2-7A 7601 Peak Technologies $1,736.00 Office Supplies 7602 Packet Flight Guide $96.00 Publication 7603 Poly Enterprises Inc., $603.40 Safety Supplies 7604 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. $18.60 Elecim;Supplies 7605 Power Systems Testing Company $5.225.00 Electric Pam 7606 Presidium Inc 52,083.33 Workers Comp Claims Administration. 7607 Pryor Resources,Inc. $166.07 Seminar Registration County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 1029/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7608 Pumping Solutions Inc. $9.406.58 Mechanical Supplies 7609 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. $140.54 Electric Pads 7610 Roll Systems Corporation $212.50 Consulting Services 7611 Rellasler 511,797.88 Life Insurance Premium 7612 Rome Sales Company,Inc. $7,540.00 Service Ageemenl 7613 Rden&Tucker Alomeys at law $6,263.79 Legal Services 7014 RD Instruments $90.62 Freight 7615 RJN Group.Inc. $9.000.00 Service Agreement 7616 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc $947.00 Engineering Servloea 7617 RPM Electric Motors $1,341.50 Electric Motor Pads 761a Safety Images $150.85 Safety Supplies 7619 Sancon Ergmeedn0.lnc $2,500.00 Engineering Services 7620 Schenck Trebel $1,053.80 Balancing Machine Printer 7621 Science Applications Intl.,Cc $11.507.03 Ocean Monitoring MO 64-94 7822 Scott Specialty Oases In. $187.28 Specialty Gases 7023 Scott.Reilly&Whitehead $588.22 Legal Services-Personnel Issues 7624 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. $250.00 Lab Repalre 7625 Second-Sun $1.337.87 Light Fixtures 7626 Showbiz Pizza Time $397.95 Permit Fee Refund 7627 Shunduck Sales&Engineering $8.072.98 Toole/Hardware 1- 7628 Slevers $330.90 Filters V 7629 Simon&Schuster $345.88 Publications M 7630 Skelar.the $209.00 Equipment Repair b1 7631 Skill Crag Body Shop 5442.77 Claim Settlement m 7632 Soca-Lynch Corp. 5482.72 JanOodal Supplies 7633 South Coast Water $10.00 Lab Supplies 7634 Southern CrNfomis Edison $12,294.67 Electrical Facilities Relocation Charges 7635 Southern California Edison $60.00 Conference Registration 7636 Southwest Scientific Inc. $1.149.15 Instrument Paris 7637 Sparkle8s $2.015.62 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 7638 Spex Co prep Inc. $1.453.40 Lob Supplies 7639 Splmex Company,Inc. $0,126.43 Janitorial Supplies 7640 Slaminet Inc. $95.00 Service Agreement 7641 Summit Steel $8.531.22 Metal 7642 Sunset Ford $750.09 Truck Pads 7643 Supelco Inc $109.70 Lab Supplies 7644 Super Chem Corporation $1,209.55 Chemicals 7645 John W.Swindler $3.422.83 Expense Relmb. 7646 Tekmar Company 5253.20 Cable 7647 The To Bender 5224.34 A/C Dud Work 7648 Theodore Robbins Ford $301.11 Vehicle Rental 7649 Thermo Jarrell Ash Corp. $10.800.00 Service Agreement 7650 Think Earth Environmental Education Foundation $7,000.00 Membership 7651 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $330.79 Mechanical Parts 7652 Tonga Lock&Safe Semim $138.01 Locks&Keys 7653 Aerelund FlnancieOTop Hal Productions $241.09 Directors Meeting Expense County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/29/97 Check No. - Vendor Amount Descrlpllon 7654 Toshiba International Corporation $160.77 Instrument Pads 7655 Troplal Plaza Nursery,Inc. $3,735.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO5-11-94 7656 Truck and Auto Supply,Inc. $49.16 Truck Pads 7657 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $310.00 Lab Services 7658 Tustin Dodge $296,03 Truck Pads 7659 Ultro Scientific $65.00 Lab Supplies 7660 Unitce ConsuHing Engineers $20,000,00 Professional Services 7661 Union Bank of Cal.Gov`.Services $2,970.91 Account Analysis 7662 The Unisoures Corporation $9.086.02 Office Supplies 7663 United Parcel Service $538.44 Parcel Services 7564 United States Fitter Corp. $1,262.75 Lab Supplies 7665 Valley CHles Supply Company $3,387.29 Plumbing Supplies 7666 Van Waters&Rogers Inc. $1.651.60 Chemicals 7667 Voxon Corp.and DeAd Medellin $1.922.05 Employee Computer Loan Program 7668 VAR Scientific Products $9,865.16 Lab Supplies 7669 The Wackenhut Corporation $11,901.12 Contract Service-Security Guards 7670 The Wall Street Journal $322.17 Subscription 7671 Waste Markets $9,325.42 Residuals Removal MO 3-27-96 7672 Water Education Foundation $35.32 Subscription 7673 Water Envlronmem Federation $81.25 Seminar Reglatrabon 7674 Waterman Supply Co.,Inc $431.00 Chain 7675 Western Business Systems $528.63 Payroll Check Stock f' 1676 Weslem Eternfs Inc. $2,150.00 Construction-Stucco HR Building m 7677 Western Health Services $4,770.00 Professional Services l 7678 Western Industrial Supply $811.98 Tool Boxes 7679 Wilmington Instrument Co.,Inc $143.38 Equipment Repair 7680 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $1,857.50 Professional Services 7681 WW Grainger Inc. $991.86 Compressor Parts 7682 Xerox Corporation $9.870.33 Copier Leases 7683 Zymadk Corporation $7,000.00 Lab Equipment 7684 Jose C.Ambriz $399.45 Expense Reimb. 7685 Layne T.Baroldi $163.90 Expense Relmb. 7686 Michael A.Bemis $2,181.94 Employee Computer Loan Program 7687 Howard P.Lembke,Jr $1,320.84 Expense Reimb. 7688 Raymond Navaao $132.75 Expense Reimb. 7688 Fred J.OBrien $1,040.27 Expense Reimb. 7690 County of Orange $3,225.00 Administmtive Fees 7691 County Sanitation District of $1,142.65 Petty Cash Reimb. 7692 Donna Anderson,Larry Anderson $190,000.00 Newpnr Spill Claim Settlement NO 8.27-97 7693 CWEA $170.00 Conference Registration 7694 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. $2.231.27 Fame Chloride MO 9-27-95 7695 Roland T.McReynolds $578.57 Expense Reimb. 7696 Santa Fe Beg Co.,Inc. $840.45 Polypropylene Bags 7697 Schwin9 America,Inc. $61.71 Pump Pars 7698 Sejal Patel $203.67 Expense Reimb. Total Claims Paid 10/29/97 $4,291,640.17 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 1029/97 Summary Amount District No.1 $780.43 District No.2 $1,740.59 District No.3 $7.571.73 District No.5 $197.299.00 District No.11 5397.96 CORP $2,280.775.96 Self Insurance Funds $311.260.02 Joint Operations $1,511.814.40 $4.291,640.17 Y rt p1 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date roI si 01/28/98 �(� AGENDA REPORT Item Number It N}tp,be, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Y FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Communications Originator: Ross H. Tipps, Senior Accounting Clerk SUBJECT: Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts by Roll Call Vote. (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each district represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Staff recommends ratification of payment of claims in accordance with the attached check listing. SUMMARY See attached check listing. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A X:1uy.EleVnITNIgpa,RpvM.0.ev"FmnbN R.„..a. vsge Page f CEQA FINDINGS T N/A ATTACHMENTS Copies of Claims Paid reports from 11/12/97 and 11/26197. H:M ft�H�F- R.w 1e Page 2 County Sanitation Districts or orange County - Claims Paid 11/12/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Gesaipllon 7724 Blo Gro Division $26,815.72 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 7725 County Of Orange $33.834.00 Digital Base Maps Of Smaids 7726 Dell Marketing L.P. $51,630.94 Computers 7727 Delta Dental $39,055.41 Dental Insurance Plan 7728 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $85,877.57 Natural Gas 7729 DP Mechanical $39,360.00 Data Alm Air Conditioning Unt 7730 FMC Corporation-Chemical Products, $67.012.38 Hydrogen Peroxide MO 9.14.94 7731 Glerlich-Michell, Inc $33,769.74 Pump Pads 7732 Kenumn Pacific,Inc. $54,707.92 Ferric Clodde MO 9-27-95 7733 Parker Diving Services,Inc. $63,012.00 Inspection Services MO 3.21-97 77M Pima Gm Systems Inc $54.552.70 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 7735 Southern California Edison $345.777.00 Power 7736 Southern California Edison $73.830.92 Power 7737 American Telephone B Telegraph-Megacam $3.332.19 Long Distance Telephone Services 7738 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $11.95 Long Distance Telephone Services 7739 American Telephone&Telegraph-Pro Walla $843.30 Long Distance Telephone Services T740 A-Plus Systems $859.56 Notices&Ada 7741 Air cad supply $87.75 Air Conditioner Repose 7742 Air Conditioning Specialties $165.27 Filter Adhesive 7743 Air Liquids America Corporation $518.73 Specialty Gasses 7744 Allied Supply Co. $5,109.53 Mechanical Parts 7745 American Airlines $11,035.75 Travel Services 7746 American Digital Technologies $3.426.55 Software 7747 Anthony Pest Control,Ina $215.00 Service Agreement 7748 Appleone Employment Service $3,070.50 Temporary Employment Services 7749 Applied Industrial Technology $354.14 Pump Paris 7750 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $3,000.00 Lob Analysis 7751 Arizona Instrument $987.18 Instrument Supplies 7752 Awards&Trophies By Bea $213.61 Plaques 7753 Assoc of Metro Sewerage Agencies $16,295.00 Membership 7754 AWSI $229.D0 D.O.T.Training Program 7755 Balley Fleeter&Porter Company $3.39 Chlorination Supplies 7755 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $1,699.85 Printing MO 11-7-94 7757 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $6,306.24 Telephone Installation T758 Barclays Law Publishers $110.09 Publications 7759 Benz Engineering,Inc. $175.24 Compressor Pads 7760 Billings Industries $775.00 Maria Monitoring Supplies 7761 Brawn And Caldwell $3,021.67 Engineering Services Ras 93-101 7762 Budget Janitorial, Inc. $3,086.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94 7763 Bus&Associates Inc. $836.00 Surveying Senlcas MO 625-97 7764 Colt Dept Of Transportation $55.00 Publications 7755 California Environmental Controls $766.82 Mechanical Pads 7766 Caloympic Safety $3.476.99 Safety Supplies 7767 Carrel,Inc. $1,087.40 Hardware 7768 Canes Corporation $2.514.03 Fiber Optic Cable 7769 Capitol Weakly $149.00 Subscription County Sanitation Districts Or orange County Claims Paid 11H2/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7770 Carollo Engineers $8.688.60 Engineering Services J-33-2 7771 Catapult Inc. $5,288.00 OnSite Training 7772 Canlrepointe Commerdal Interiors $1.064.57 Office Furniture 7773 Cerrnat $20.00 Computer Services 7774 The City Associalee,Inc. $0,687.50 Hearing Officer Services 7775 Cale-Panner Instrument Company $72.08 Lab Supplies 7776 Computers Amedce,Inc. $2.020.41 Computer Supplies 7777 Con-Way Western Express $76.53 Freight 7776 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $7.631.73 Electric Parts 7779 Consolidated Reprographics $362.44 Printing Services 7780 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co $207.57 Plumbing Supplies 7781 Continental-McLaughlin $438.29 Tools 7782 Cooper Cameron Corporation $502.64 Engine Paris 7783 Core Laboratories,Inc $400.00 Soils Testing 7784 Corporate Express $4,922.93 Office Supplies 7785 County Wholesale Electric Co. $2.994.33 Electric Parts 7786 Crane Pro Services $2,046.50 Crane Paris 7787 Wilbur Cddlebaugh $176.00 Insurance Premium Refund 7788 Culligan Water $28.00 Soft Water Service 7789 CCI Technologies $2.063.00 Remove Data Cables 7790 CS Company $1,273.83 Plumbing Supplies 7791 CWEA $475.00 Seminar Registration 7792 Day&Nile Door Service Inc. $2,187.50 Door Installation 7793 Diamond H Rocegn8lon $127.25 Service Awams 7794 Dickson Inc, $2.702.00 Construction Services T795 Dunn.Ecwards Corporation $422.81 Paint Supplies 7796 Dycerp USA,Inc. $478.17 Truck Pane 7797 DGA Consultants,Inc. $12.644.78 Surveying Services MO B-8-94 7796 DME,Inc. $50.00 Compressor Paris 7799 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. $60.00 Medical Screening 7800 Electra-Band $404.06 Equipment Repair 7801 Emergency Management Natwmk $2,007.50 CPR/First Aid Training 7802 Enchanter,Inc. $3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 7803 Enlightened Leadership International $399.00 Seminar Registration 7804 Environmental Resources Association $2.282.80 Lab Services 7805 Federal Express $861.50 Air Freight 7806 Fitter Supply Company $3.726.77 Filler, 7807 Flat and Vertical,Inc. $152.00 Concrete Cu81ng 7808 Forked Engineering&Surveying $7,726.30 Engineering Services MO 6-25.97 7809 Fountain Valley Camera $51D.44 Photo Supplies 7810 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $308.17 Paint Supplies 7811 Founded Valley Rancho Auto Wash $825.52 Truck Wash Tickets 7812 Franklin Quest Co. $114.58 Office Supplies 7813 Freeway Sales and Service $198.62 Office Equipment 7814 Ganahl Lumbar Company $73.43 Lumber/Hardware 7815 GarrattCallahan Company $2.881.24 Chemicals 4' r County Sanitallon Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 11/12/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7816 GTE California $1,802.58 Telephone Services 7817 Getinge Castle $936.00 Lab Supplies 7518 Government Institutes Inc. 585.00 Publication 7819 Graphic Distributors $505.35 Photographic Supplies 7820 Graseby STI $785.67 Engine Parts 7821 The Great American Printing Co $420.08 Printing Services 7822 Greet Western Sanitary Supplies $397.90 Jandorlal Supplies 7823 The Hacienda $399.35 Executive Management Retreat Expense 7824 Herrington Industrial Plastics $63.48 Plumbing Supplies 7825 Hilti Inc $7,898.31 Tools 7826 Hoerbiger Service Inc $244.64 Compressor Parts 7827 Home Depot $68.21 Small Hardware 7828 City of Huntington Beach $13,416.41 Water Use 7829 J.P.Nissen Cc $42.56 Office Supplies 7830 Jamison Engineering,Ina. $2.927.50 Consirectlon Services 7831 Jay's Catering $352.34 Directors'Meeting Expense 7832 Jendham, Inc. $845.00 Seminar Registration 7833 Johnstone Supply $138.20 Electric Parts 78U Keith D Stolzenbach,PH.D.,P. $16,900.00 Ocean Monitoring 7835 Kennedy Hydraulics $919.11 Motor Repairs 7836 Kaye Productivity Canter $125.00 Seminar Registration 7837 Knox Industrial Supplies $2.625.53 Tools 7838 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company $2,150,43 Cellular Telephone Service 7839 Labware Inc. $60D.00 Training Registration 7840 LaserAll Corporation $2.435.72 Service Agreement 7841 Law/Crandall $6,278.50 Sell Testing MO 7-13-94 7842 Leadership Directories $637.00 Subscription 7943 Leadership Directed" $1,210.30 Subscriptions 7844 Manhole Adjusting $6,305.00 Sewer Repairs 7845 Mar Vac Electronics $14.10 Instrument Supplies 7846 Me Junkin Corp $100.09 Plumbing Supplies 7847 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $926.69 Tools 7848 Measurement Variables,Inc. $1,265.08 Fillers 7849 Mee Analytical System $4.743.00 Ocean Monitoring 7850 Medlin Controls Co. $50.96 Instrument Supplies 7851 Mellon Trust $14,977.31 Investment Custodian Bank 7852 Mllltronics Inc $859.01 Electric Supplies 7853 Mission Uniform Service $2,239.15 Uniform Rentals 7854 Mobile Modular Management Corp $344.80 Office Trailer Lease 7855 MotePhoto $13.54 Photographic Services 7856 MPS Photographic Services,Inc $98.61 Photographic Services 7857 National Microcomp Services $3,370.00 Maintenance Agreement 7858 New Horizons Computer Learning $2.000.00 OnSBe Training 7859 City of Newport Beach $125.18 Water Use 7860 Omni Western Incorporated $76 98 Tools 7861 Optio Software $1.65774 Professional Services County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 11/12197 Check No. Vendor Amount Descdptlon 7862 Orange County Fame Supply Co. $21.24 Chemicals 7863 Oxygen Service Company $4,328.39 Specialty Gases 7864 Pacific Bell $29.98 Telephone Services 7865 Pacific Mechanical Supply $1.346.40 Plumbing Supplies 7866 Pacific Pads and Controls,Inc. $1,034.02 Instrument Supplies 7867 Parkhouse Tire Inc $311.89 Truck Tires 7868 Petce Animal Supplies $104.20 Lab Supplies 7869 Photoron U.S.A.,Inc. $392.00 Lab Supplies 7870 Polypum.Inc.&/or Polydyne $23.071.51 Cationic Polymer MO 3A 1.92 7871 Power Machine Co. $563.15 Pump Parts 7872 Red Wing Shoes $122.40 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 7873 Reish Marina Studies,I.e. $320.00 Ocean Monitoring 7874 Remedy $16,193.45 Temporary Employment Services 7875 RPM Electric Motors $1.713.13 Electric Molar Parts 7876 S&J Supply Co Inc $751.49 Pump Parts 7877 Sancon Engineering,Inc. $6,85D.00 Engineering Services 7878 Science Applications Intl.,Co $3,601.53 Ocean Monitoring MO 68-94 7879 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $256.50 Specially Gases 7880 SemndSun $709.15 Light Factures 7881 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $2.025.37 Tools/Hardware 7882 Sigma Aldrich,Inc. $168.48 Lab Supplies 7883 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. $469.84 Plumbing Supplies 7884 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $171.90 Permit Fees 7885 South Coast Water $125.00 Lab Supplies 7886 Southern California Water $85.56 Water Use 7887 Southwest Scientific Inc. $1,149.15 Meter 7888 Spading Instrument Co..Inc. $4.764.49 Meter 7889 Standard and Poors Corp. $2,500.00 COP Contract Service 7890 Slate Chemical Mfg.Co. $342.09 Lube Oil 7891 Corporate Trust $5,795.50 COP Trustee Services 7892 Sunset Ford $93.27 Truck Pans 7893 SWRCB Accounting Office $10.000.00 Annual Permit 7894 Texas Commerce Bank National Association $6,371.12 COP Trustee Services 7895 The Register $793.80 Notices&Ads 7896 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $2,558.76 Mechanical Pads 7897 Time Motion Tools $84.60 Electric Parts 7898 Time Warner Communications $86.22 Cable Services 7899 Aemfund Financial/Top Hat Productions $125.37 Directors'Meeting Expense 7900 Tropical Plane Nursery,Inc. $3,973.84 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 7901 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $36.62 Truck Pads 7902 Michelle Tuchman $128.39 Expense Raimb. 7903 TCH Associates,Inc. $3,451.80 Water Sampler Bolles 7904 United Concrete Companies $312.08 Concrete 7905 United Parcel Service $28.82 Parcel Services 7906 Valley Cites Supply Company $5,053.90 Plumbing Supplies 7907 Vlllalobos&Associates $895.18 Engineering Services County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 11112J97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7908 VWR Scientific Products $1,330.24 Lab Supplies 7909 The Wackenhut Corporation $2,975.28 Contract Service-Security Guards 7910 The Wall Street Journal $23.17 Subscription 7911 Waste Markets $12,080.76 Residuals Removal MO 3.27-96 7912 Wesco Distribution Inc. $1,216.45 Instrumem Supplies 7913 Western States Chemical Inc. $12,091.47 Caustic Soda MO B-23-95 7914 WCS Distributing $1.665.73 Bleach Tank Repair 7915 Xerox Corporation $2.718.84 Copier Leases 7916 Blake Anderson $99.00 Expense Reimb. 7917 Nicholas J.Arhontes $958.37 Expense Reimb. 7918 JLisa Carlson $214.53 Expense Reimb. 7919 David P.Halvorson $287.65 Expense Reimb. 7920 Vladimir A.Kogan $820.70 Expense Refmb. 7921 DaVM A.Ludwln $1,489.30 Expense Reimb. 7922 Kathleen T.Mlllea $295.00 Expense Relmb. 7923 Michael D.Moore $587.75 Expense Relmb. 7924 Samuel L.Mowbray $184.47 Expense Relmb. 7925 Michael L.Peterman $248.44 Expense Reimb. 7926 Douglas M.Stewart $1,739.50 Expense Reimb. 7927 Robert C.Thompson $376.43 Expense Reimb. 7928 Edward M.Torres $733.69 Expanse Reimb. 7929 Compuxpmss And Cad Hemgstad $1,152.06 Employee Computer Loan Program 7930 Compuxpross And Henry Lorimer $2,021.05 Employee Computer Loan Program 7931 Compuxpmu And Patrick Bourdy $1,997.98 Employee Computer Loan Program 7932 County of Orange $1,950.00 Administrative Fees 7933 County Sanitation Distdct of OC $907.66 Petry Cash Relmb. 7934 PC ClubSeuth Coast And Dionne Kerdos $3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 7935 State Chemical Mfg.Co. $125.96 Oil Total Claims Paid 11I12J97 $1.444.665.32 Summary Amount District No.2 $6,311.14 District No.7 $6,162.22 CORP $147.119.96 Joint Operations $1,285,072.00 $1,444,665.32 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 1126197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7957 Blo Oro Division $25,302.27 Residuals Removal MO 4-20-95 7958 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $280,730.00 Engineering Services 7959 Carollo Engineers $66,805.52 Engineering Services J-33.2 7950 Coach&Sons Inc.,DBA Collch $41.374.18 Construction 11-17-1 7961 County of Orange $1,264,708.23 Special Assessment User Fees Overpayment 7902 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. $70.314.08 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 7963 Orange County Water District $50,479.20 GAP Water Use MO 10-23.98 7964 Pima Gro Systems Inc $98,165.24 Residuals Removal NO 3.29-95 7965 Science Applications Intl.,Co $111.741.88 Ocean Monitoring MO S-8-94 7988 Southern California Edison $49.983.68 Power 7967 Tub RanchlMagan Farms $93.881.18 Residuals Removal 7968 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $120,788.74 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No,C-0 7969 Western Stales Chemical Inc. $29,529.53 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 7970 Woodruff.Sprodlin&Small $61,056.57 Legal Services NO 7.26-95 7971 Advanco Constructors Inc $418,994.10 Construction J-34-1,P2-35.5 7972 Alrpol Construction,Inc. S62,973.38 Construction PI-51R 7973 Margate Construction Inc. $2.172.084.74 Construction PI-36-2 7914 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $242.487.00 Construction P2.35.3,PI-38-5,P246,P2-55 7975 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $14.40 Long Distance Telephone Services 7975 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $4.30 Lang Distance Telephone Services 79" A411us Systems E2,187.42 Notioea&Ads 7978 Air Products and Chemicals,Inc. $22.500.00 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen.Syst.MO 841-69 7979 Abboume Express $29.25 Air Freight 7980 American Management Association $290.00 Seminar Registration 7981 American Sigma,Inc. $975.70 Mechanical Supplies 7982 Appleone Employment Service $2,050.49 Temporary Employment Services 7083 Applied Industrial Technology $31.54 Pump Pads 7984 Aquatic Bloassay And Consulting $235.00 Lab Supplies 7985 Aquatic Center $40.00 Air Tanks 7986 Aquatic Testing Laboratories E4,000.00 Lab Analysis 7987 AIkINJones Computer Services S642.60 Service Agreement 7988 Auto Club of Southern CaiOomla $1,503.33 Claim Settlement 7988 Awards&Trophies By Bea $124.36 Plaques 7990 ARK Technologies $5.720.00 Professional Services 7991 ASTD Publishing Service $48.00 Publication 7992 Balance Consulting,Inc. 533&00 Seminar Regislmtion 7993 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $5,079.30 Telephone Installation 7994 Barclays Law Publishers $99.00 Publication 7995 Somas&Noble Books $3,840.17 Subscription 7996 BbMerleux Vitek,Inc. $1.488.00 Lab Supplies 7997 Brown And Caldwell $705.51 Engineering Services Res 93-101 7995 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $520.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94 7999 Bureau of National Affalre $1,646.50 Software 8000 Cal-Glass.Inc. $37.72 Lab Supplies e001 California Relocation Services $242.50 File Moving Services 8002 Catapult Inc. E4.0g0.00 On-Sae Computer Training County Sensation Districts Of Orange Count' Claims Paid 11/26/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8003 Centrepolnte Commercial lnterom $6.097.15 Office Furniture 8004 Capp Corp $4,323.83 Safety Supplies 8005 Chapman Counseling $8,200.00 Employee Training BODE Chrome Crankshaft Co. $50.00 Pump Paris 8007 City of Fountain Valley $860.00 Water Use 8008 Clayton Environmental Consultants $2,214.26 Professional Services SODS Closson B Closson $1,610.50 Landscape Construction Management 8010 Coast Fhe Equipment 1106.59 Service Agreement 8011 Communications Performance Group $23.918.40 Professional Services 8012 Compuserve Incorporated $992.90 Computer Services 8013 Conunamal-Mclaughlln $433.81 Tools 8014 Cooper Cameron Corpomllon $11,377.55 Engine Pads 8015 Core Laboratories,Inc $800.00 Soils Testing 8016 Corporate Express $1.047.58 Office Supplies $017 County of Orange $9,442.34 Municipal Radio Services 8018 County Sanitation Districts of OC $24.539.76 Workers Comp Relmb. 8019 Culligan Water $28.00 Soft Water Service 8020 CCI Technologies 5880.00 Remove Data Cables 8021 D S S Conveyors $570.00 Equipment Repair 8022 Datavaull $110.00 Oibite Back-Up Tape Storage 8023 David E.Uloart,Ph.D. $1,750.00 Management Training 8024 De Guelle 8 Sons Oleos Co. $283.44 Safety Glass 8025 Dal Mar Analytical $760.00 Slosolids Analysis 8026 Dail Marketing L.P. $15,558.93 Computers 8027 Diamond H Ramgnillon $05.12 Service Awards 8028 Dlatedch-Post $532.01 Clamps 8029 Dover Elevator Company $3.441.00 Elevator Maintenance 8030 Dunn-Edwards Corporation $1.724.60 Palm Supplies 8031 Duthie Generator Service,Inc. $12.800.00 Equipment Rental 8032 DGA Consultants,Inc. $8.716.00 Surveying Services MO 64494 $033 DME,Inc. $B81.29 Compressor Parts 8034 Electra Band,Inc. $888.94 Equipment Repair 8035 Emergency Management NeWork $720.00 CPR First Aid Training 8036 Enchanter,Inc. 54,200.DO Oman Monitoring MO 524.95 8037 Environmental Resources Association $1,274.10 Lab Servima 8038 Envision Of Irvine And Chad"Reed $1.375.10 Employee Computer Loan Program 8039 Experian $117.92 Orange County Property Information 8040 ENS Resources,Inc $1.181.01 Professlonal Services 8041 Fairbanks Scabs,Inc. $1.600.00 Service Agreement 8042 Federal Express $606.00 Air Freight 8043 Fibemon $383.49 Fiber Optic Cable 8044 Fisher Scientific $6,219.14 Lab Supplies 8045 Flo-Systems,Inc $1.063.52 Pump Pads 8046 Forked Engineering B Surveying $4.928.50 Engineering Services MO 6-25-97 OD47 Richards Capital Corporation $850.00 Office Supplies 8048 Fortis Benefits Insurenm Comp $8.469.45 Disability finumnm Premiums Oct 97 County Sanitation Dishicts Of Orange County Claims Paid 11/26/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8049 City of Fountain Valley $11,842.32 Water Use 8050 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering $332.95 Paint Supplies 6051 Fry's Electronics $21.54 Electronic&Computer Supplies 8052 The Gas Company $20.892.35 Natural Gas 8053 Gauge Repair Service $195.00 Equipment Repair 6054 General Petroleum $17,043./g Unleaded Gasoline W55 GTE California $6,044.68 Telephone Services 8056 Goldenwest Window Service $1,656.01D Window Cleaning Service $057 Great Pacific Equipment Co. $1,346.88 Creme Rental 8058 Guy L.Warden&Sons $474.72 Compressor Pads 8059 Edwards Systems Technology $1,462.50 Service Agreement 8060 Hooker Equipment Company $1,892.00 Truck Pads W61 Harold Primrose Ice $48.0D Ice For Samples 8062 Harrington Industrial Plastics $205.60 Plumbing Supplies 8063 Hatch&Kirk Inc. $840.45 Truck Paris 6064 Hautsway Storage Containers $1.035.00 Container Rentals 8065 Herb's Bladdorest Bakery&Dell $40.05 Directors'Meeting Expense 8066 Hersey Measurement Company $547.06 Equipment Repair 8057 HIM Inc $359.35 Tools 8068 Holmes&Narver Inc $4,342.29 Engtn%dng Services 8069 Home Depot $624.19 Small Hardware 8070 Honba Instruments Inc $1,557.12 Electric Paris 8071 Hub Auto Supply $202.10 Truck Pads 8072 Hughes Aircraft Co. $3,446.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 8073 HI Standard Automotive $77.58 Truck Parts 8074 Indusmal Hearing&Pulmonary $3,195.00 Audlometdc&Pulmonary Testing Of Employees 8075 Industrial Threaded Products, $2,963.82 Connectors 8076 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $199.45 Lab Supplies 8077 Interstate Battery Systems 5658.69 Batteries 8078 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $47.46 Water Use 8079 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $1,091.47 Instrument Parts 8080 Jays Catering $829.80 Directors'Meeting Expense 8081 Jim's Suspension Servka $25.00 Truck Repairs 8D82 Johnstone Supply $1.839.22 Electric Pads 8083 Kelly Paper $776.45 Paper Bogs Kennedy Hydraulics $4,181.39 Motor Repairs 8085 Kewaunee SUentlBC Corporatlon $15,834.92 Office Furniture 8056 Knox Industrial Supplies $4,798.30 Tools 8087 Labware Inc. $750.00 Consulting Services MO 2-26-97 8088 Law/Crandall $2,360.00 Soil Testing 7-13-94 5089 Loral Agency Formation Commission $5.000.00 CSDOC Consolidation Review Fee 8090 Ludolph T.Lommer $206.23 Electric Parts Rehnb. 8091 Las Angeles Galvanizing Company $161.63 Steal 8092 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $1,364.08 Tools 8093 Medlin Controls Co. $423.29 Instrument Supplies 8D94 Micmlac Laboratories,Inc. $720.00 Gas Analysts 4 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange Count' ` Claims Paid I IrA 87 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8095 Midway Mfg 0 Machining Cc $4.099.61 Mechanical Repairs 80% MIIIIronics Inc $1,480A4 Electric Supplies 8097 Mission Uniform Servlca $3.708.99 Unform Rentals 8098 Mitchell Repair Information Co $550.51 Instrument 8099 MoloPhoto $55.65 Photographic Services 8100 MPS Photographic Services,Inc $222.90 Photographic Services 8101 Nat West Markets $1.250.00 COP Interest Draw Fees 8102 National Information Data Center $48.90 Publication 8103 National Research Council Canada $174.00 Publication 8104 New Pig $825.84 Generator Pads 8105 Nickey Petroleum Cc Inc $633.88 Lubricants 8106 Norcal Controls Incorporated $468.57 Instrument Pads 8107 NC AWWAIWEA $100.00 Conference Registration 8108 Office Depot Business Services S4,055.10 Office Supplies 8109 Optio Schwan, $210.00 Software 8110 Orange County Industrial Plastics $2,950.00 Plastic Sheets 8111 Orange County Red Cross $78.00 Safety Training 8112 Orange Courier $20.70 Courier Services 8113 Oxygen Service Company $3,229.91 Specialty Gases 8114 OCV Control Valves $185.19 Valve Pads 8115 P.L.Hawn Company Inc. $10,281.89 Electric Supplies 8116 Pacific Bell $85.15 Telephone Services 8117 Peclhc Mechanical Supply $5,499.00 Plumbing Supplies 8118 Pacific Pads and Controls,Inc $9.502.26 Instrument Parts 8119 Padgett-Thompson $139.00 Seminar Registration 8120 Padre Janitorial Supplies $887.21 Janitorial Supplies 8121 Pak West $17.12 Janitorial Supplies 8122 Parkhouse Tire Inc $319.13 7Ires 8123 Pads Unlimited $799.55 Truck Pads 8124 Panay Bowes $323.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement 8125 Polypum,Inc.Wor Polydyne,Inc. $24,405.60 Canonic Polymer MO 3.11-92 8126 Prentice Hell Wor Simon B Schuster $84.52 Publication 8127 Pryor Resources,Inc. $267.00 Seminar Registration 8128 Reahlme Systems Corporation $1.341.12 Consulting Services 8129 Rellastar $8,330.00 Life Insurance Premium 8130 Remedy $4,201.87 Temporary Employment Services 8131 Adders Rene.cu $1.397.72 Expense Reimb. 8132 Rosen's Electrical Equipment Co. $2,190.51 Electric Pads 6133 Ryon Herco Products Corp. $1,426.68 Pump Pads 8134 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. $211.62 Paint Supplies 8135 Safety-Kleen $153.50 Equipment Repair 8136 Scantech,Inc $2,500.00 Sewer System Atlas 8137 Schwing America,Inc. $539.47 Pump Pads 8138 Sean $738.24 Freezer Pert. 8139 Service Were Inc. $200.00 Seminar Registration 8140 Shureluck Sales 6 Engineering $711.15 Tools I Hardware County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 1V26197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8141 Snap-On Incorporated $882.09 Tools 8142 Southern California Air Cond. $462.12 Compressor Pads 8143 Southern California Marine Institute $1,930.00 Rental Equipment 81" Spiveco Inc. $1,443.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 8145 Sprint $32.10 Telephone Services 8146 Starnimd Inc. $16,02588 Computer 8147 Stanford Video Media Group $524.27 Training Videos 8148 State Board Of Equalization $199.08 Underground Petroleum Storage Fee 8149 Statexlet $165.00 Seminar Registration 8150 Summit Steel $1,987.25 Metal 8151 Sunset Ford $52.82 Truck Parts 8152 SARSS-CWEA $28.00 Conference Registration 8153 Technomic Publishing Company $144.95 Publication 8154 The Holman Group $T72.48 EAP Premium Oct 97 8155 Thomas Grey B Associates,Inc. $330.00 Safety Testing 8156 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $17,760.84 Mechanical Parts 8157 Tidepool Scientific Software $654.50 Software 8158 Trenchless Technology $350A0 Seminar Registration 8159 Tropial Plaza Nursery,Inc. $12.079.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 8160 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. $635.78 Truck Parts 8161 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $3.245.60 Lab Services 8162 TCH Associates,Inc. $988.72 Lab Supplies 8163 TWComcorp Communications Supplies $3,167.10 Telephone Equipment 8164 U.S.Filler $1.252.75 Lab Supplies 8165 U.S.Postal Service $5,000.00 Postage 8166 United Concrete Companies $318.33 Concrete 8167 United Parcel Service $755.15 Parcel Services 8168 UnWmfty of Nevada,Las Vegas $750.00 Seminar Registration 8169 Vako Instruments Co.Ina $329.24 Valve Parts 8170 Valley C8les Supply Company $3,016.08 Plumbing Supplies 8171 Van Waters B Rogers Inc. $3,636.56 Chemicals 8172 Vertex Business Systems $1,350.00 Computer Data Support 8173 Village Nurseries $42.01 Landscaping Supplies 8174 VWR Scientific Products $2.526.16 Lab Supplies 8175 W.D.Prow Company $181.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 8176 The Wackenhut Corporation $5,976.19 Contract Service-Security Guards 0177 WIN Grainger Inc. $3,735.07 Compressor Parts 8178 Xerox Corporation $1,147.00 Copier Leases 8179 Moyasar T.Yehya $1,198.95 Expense Reimb. 8180 Blake Anderson $83.18 Expanse Reimb. 8181 Mark Castile $1.220.10 Expense Reimb. 8182 Gregory R.Mathews $494.56 Expense Reimb. 8183 Chad"D.McGee $180.83 Expense Reimb. 8184 Donald F.McIntyre $69.62 Expense Reimb. 8185 Dawn M.McXinley $2,175.00 Seminar Registration Reimb. aim Christopher M.Pelletier $859.45 Expense Relmb. aC' ., County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County a Claims Paid 11/26/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 8187 Edward M.Tones $239.04 Expanse Relmb. 8180 William F.Webster,Jr $476.45 Expense Relmb. 8189 Nancy J.Wheatley $1.276.26 Expense Relmb. 8190 Charles F.Winter $1.987.74 Expense Reimb. 8191 County of Orange $1.020.00 Administrative Fees 8192 County of Orange $945.00 Administrative Foes 3193 County Sanitation District of OC $1.720.48 Petty Cash Relmb. 8194 Sllican Ave Ine.Comptr.and Randy Harris $1.175.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 8195 Fortis Benefits Insurance Comp $9,190.97 Disability Insurance Premiums 8196 polestar $4,627.48 Life Insurance Premium 8197 Southern California Edison $6,255.20 Power 8198 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. $60.00 Traffic Grate 8199 Ousters Map Stand $452.55 Thomas Bum.Wall Maps 8200 Diehl,Evans&Co.,LLP $375.00 Seminar Registration 8201 Padgett-Thompson $139.00 Seminar Registration 8202 Reliaslar $8,153.06 Like Insurance Premium 8203 Merin Telebl $1.098.55 Expense Relmb. 8207 Slemon,Larsen&Moral, $8,000.00 Professional Services Total Claims Paid 11/26/97 $5.875.208.58 Summary Amount District No.2 $1,625.63 District No.3 $8,715.00 District No.6 $3,446.43 District No.7 $35.00 District No. 11 $41,374.16 CORE $3,185,772.58 Self Insurance Funds $26,043.09 Joint Operations $2,608.126.69 $5,875,208.58 JOINT BOARDS Meetng Date I ToR.ads . 01/28/98 01/28/97 AGENDA REPORT Itern Number ]tep Wymber County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California �1 FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Originator: Terri Josway, Manager of Safety and Emergency Response SUBJECT: Designation of Applicant's Agent Resolution for obtaining Federal and State financial assistance GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt attached State Office of Emergency Services Resolution for the purpose of obtaining federal and/or state financial assistance. SUMMARY On December 10, 1997, Governor Wilson proclaimed a State of Emergency in Orange County as a result of the damage caused by the winter stones and flooding that impacted Orange County beginning on December 6. The State of Emergency Proclaimation entitles public entities, such as the Districts, to file for federal and/or state financial assistance for damage and emergency response costs. On December 6, 1997, the Districts activated the Emergency Operations Center, responded to storm- related incidents, and removed storm-related debris from various Districts facilities. No significant damage to Districts facilities has been found, however, costs incurred for emergency response and debris removal will be submitted to the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) for financial assistance. A Federal Declaration of a State of Emergency for the December 6, 1997 storm was not declared, therefore, the Districts will be eligible to receive only 75% of the emergency response and debris removal costs over$2,500. The Districts must designate the titles of individuals authorized to act on the behalf of the Districts to obtain certain federal financial assistance under P.L. 93-288 and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Act. This Resolution will authorize the General Manager, Director of Human Resources, and Manager of Safety and Emergency Response to work with OES in order to receive state disaster financial assistance. This Designation will be valid for the December 6, 1997 storm and all future State Proclaimations and Federal Declarations of State of Emergencies. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY There are no project costs. 6NIyaE.MgM.orM RpnlNbnl BwaCU19e pm ewro,SEA I.wNm ln�Orcm a.u..e ,ams, Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The Districts will be eligible to receive 75% of the emergency response and debris removal costs in excess of$2,500. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A. ALTERNATIVES There are no cost effective alternatives. The Districts are required to complete the Designation of Applicant's Agent Resolution to be eligible for federal and/or state financial assistance. No action would prevent the Districts from recovering 75% of the costs incurred, over$2,500, responding to the stone-related events and removing debris. CEOA FINDINGS N/A. ATTACHMENTS Designation of Applicants Agent Resolution (OES Form 130) DET:dt Q:NIyMafMgMf DN PWnlf M BaeNV"0-1-01 SEP ned.un nvt tloe.6N rv„�� Page 2 OFFICE OF FA¢RCENCY SERVICE$ P.A. No.: DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE OF THE (Ooremlag Body) (Name of AW icanu THAT OR (ride of Ambod� Agin) OR (fNe ofAutdirmd Agm) Rde of�Agent) is hereby authorized to execute for and in behalf of the a public Entity established under the laws of the State of California,this application and as file it in the Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance ander P.L.93-288 as amanded by the Robert T.Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988,and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Am THAT the a public Entity established under the laws of the State of California,hereby authors=its agent(s)to provide to the Stare Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such ante disaster assistance the assurmccs and agreements required. Passed and approved this day of 19_ (Name and TNe) (Nmoc and Title) (Name and rde) CERTIFICATION I, duly appointed and of (IJamel (rde) do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resclunon passed and approved by the of the on the (4wming body) (Nam.of APPlicanu day of 19_ Date: (Oft,. 1 Posiuon) (Siguaoee) DES Fo- Mfloss DAD Fbm a i Nn�R'OF P.A. No.: DESIGNATION OF / L- � APPLICANTS AGENT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Joint Hoards of pireet*W-THE .County Sanitation District$ of O.0 (Gunming Body) (NameofAPFliead) THAT General Manager OR (Tide of Am rood Agent) Director of Bureau Resources OR (rude of Authorized Agent) Manager of Safety and Emergency Response (fide oLAumomad Agent) is hereby authorized to execute for and in behalfof the rnunry Senitation Districts of O.C.apublicemity established under the laws of the State of California,this application and to file it in the Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance oodm P.L.93.299 as amended by the Roben T.Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988,and(or stare financial assistance under the Namml Diameter Assistance Act. County Sanitation Districts of O.C. THAT the a public entity established under the laws of the State of California,hereby authorizes its ageat(s)to provide to the Smrc Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster maismace the assurances and agreements required. Passed and approved this 28th day of January . 1998 Patricia A. McGuigan, District No. 1 Chair Moms and Me) (Name and Tte) (Nwe and Ttle) CERTIFICATION I. Penny Kyle .duly appointed and Board Secretary of (Name) (rare) County Sanitation Districts of O.C. ,do hereby cenifythat the above datme undcorrectcopy ofa resolution passed and approved bythc Join[ Boardsrf Direq"Ics ty Sanitation Districts o�0he. (Gmemtnp tally) (Name ofAppkno.) 28th _dayof January , i9. 98. Use; January 29, 1998 Board Secretary (OR ul yeoUnnl r n --- ' lano � oe,Rn�YM1n9"Gnrmm �+"� JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Tox.aOe. 1/28/98 1/28/99 AGENDA REPORT Item Numbv Ite; yy by County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Originator: Cymantha Atkinson, Communications Officer SUBJECT: LETTER TO IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT REGARDING CSDOC CONSOLIDATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION To reaffirm the Districts' prior commitment to maintain all the terms and conditions of all the current agreements among County Sanitation District 14, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the Irvine Ranch Water District; and authorize the Joint Chairman to transmit letter regarding the CSDOC consolidation commitment to the Irvine Ranch Water District. SUMMARY CSDOC has submitted an application to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to consolidate its nine sanitation districts into one agency. During the application's review period, the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) raised concerns regarding the contracts and agreements that exist between CSDOC, District 14 and IRWD, and between District 14 and the other existing Districts. The attached letter to IRWD addresses those concerns by citing provisions in the original application that ensure those contracts will be directly transferred and held in full farce and effect. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) rv.e�w.miw,P.emmam.vaes,m.wncwvmneer,m aoenaiuwex e�;w,. Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CSDOC has approached consolidation with the intent of transferring to the consolidated District any and all duties or obligations, and maintaining all existing contracts and agreements. As part of the application to LAFCO regarding consolidation, the following language was included in the Terms & Conditions that establish the parameters of the proposed consolidation. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to carry out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. While aware of the application's provisions, IRWD officials maintained some concem. Following a meeting between IRWD and CSDOC officials on 1/5198 to discuss these issues, IRWD has requested further assurance that the consolidation will not affect the existing contracts or agreements. The attached letter, drafted by counsel, addresses those concerns and affirms CSDOC's original intent of honoring and directly transferring to the consolidated District any and all existing contracts and agreements. By transmitting the letter, we believe IRWD's comments are responded to and their concerns will be satisfied. The application is expected to go forward and be heard by LAFCO on February 11. ALTERNATIVES Transmitting this letter maintains the current schedule for consolidation, which includes the application to LAFCO being heard at their February meeting. Any other alternative would most likely involve further discussions with IRWD, resulting in a longer review period and a delayed LAFCO hearing date. The letter simply affirms the provisions of the current application, and it is the recommended alternative. CEOA FINDINGS NIA W�GmWY1M➢-CYW,inVl9uWnswKenvMGmEa Fe%rt 01]PHB.Rc Page 2 ATTACHMENTS Letter to Irvine Ranch Water District regarding CSDOC consolidation csa %\Conbe Ii AWWGrrtnO� nsanlWns gM ft Rero 012�Gac nawd + Page 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA January 29, 1998 President Darryl Miller and Members of the Board of Directors ahO"' Irvine Ranch Water District (714)962-2411 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue n,wpng adder; Irvine, Ca. 92618-3102 P.D. B.8127 �n nVane✓.CA Dear President Miller and Members of the Board of Directors: 9272Ba12J te°""®n D9" The Board of Directors of each of the nine County Sanitation Districts of Orange raur 1 44 al alis Avenue rceln vane,.ra County (collectively, "CSDOC'), at their regular meeting held January 28, 1998, formally 92708-1016 acted to reaffirm their commitment to the terns of all the current agreements between Irvine Ranch Water District ('IRWD"), County Sanitation District No. 14, and CSDOC. The Directors have asked me to advise you of this commitment, especially as these terms relate to the pending consolidation of CSDOC. As you know, the nine Districts Mambar have filed Applications with the Orange County Loral Agency Formation Commission to A,.rm. consolidate into a single County Sanitation District, said Application being designated as • DC97-30. ce;aa The Boards, and each of them, have, from the outset of our consolidation a",area studies, given serious consideration to the long-standing relationship between the IRWD Been,Par+ and CSDOC, because of the unique contractual arrangements that have their existence Lyareae based on the formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 in 1985. Fu.rwn vanes Fda ...n Hanungtun Beach CSDOC has agreed that all of the terms and provisions of the several kvme agreements by and among the Joint Sanitation Districts, County Sanitation District No. La Habra Le Palma 14 and IRWD will continue to remain in full force and effect, and that all necessary Loa Alamiws measures will be taken to perpetuate the terms of those agreements. CSDOC, in its Newpar[Beech Application DC97-30, has requested LAFCO to approve the continuation of the Dreac PP q PP PJ.cenda substantive provisions of the agreements between IRWD and CSDOC. Santa Me Seat Beach Brenton We trust that this provides all of the necessary assurances to your District that a Taaun continued successful relationship between our agencies will be realized and enjoyed V 1 lla Park ma urea beyond the consolidation of CSDOC. County of orange sannary Dl.g = John Collins Costa Mesa Chairman, Joint Boards of Directors Garden Grove Midway car cc: CSDOC Boards of Directors Water metrlals LAFCO Executive Officer Irvine Panch H:%WP.DTAW DMINOg0\TUCHMANUNTCHAIRURWD.WPD A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed w Protecting Me Environment Since 1954 r 70INT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS V128 0 0012 eas. cll2e/se ol"-O'S AGENDA REPORT HEM Number Item Numbv County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: 1997-98 Financing Plan Inter-District Loan Agreements GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve the Districts 1 and 2 and Districts 3 and 11 District loan agreements, as authorized last month, while the Strategic Plan is being completed and a long- term financial plan is being prepared. SUMMARY At the December 1997, Joint Boards meeting, the Directors approved an inter- District loan policy. This action is to implement that policy for Districts 1 and 2, and 3 and 11. Borrowing was included in the FY 1997-98 Budgets for Districts 1 and 11. Districts 2 and 3 have sufficient accumulated funds to make these loans in accordance with the newly approved policy. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY District No. 1 will receive $6.3 million from District No. 2, while District No. 11 will receive $4.0 million from District No. 3. These funds will be repaid with interest at the average rate eamed by the long-term portfolios, from proceeds of the next COP issue. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: District COP Funds) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) 0:NteleErMop p RKO W WKwnA,.is RM 1M7W Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION , N/A ALTERNATIVES Districts 1 and 11 could issue debt (COPS) in the financial market. This alternative was discussed in the staff report supporting the December 1997. action. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Agreements prepared by General Counsel. GGS:SK:lc G�0.sVuuTAHFLLwMYrwd ,m,W Page 2 y AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR INTER-DISTRICT LOANS FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into, to be effective this_ day of 1998, by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "District No. 1", AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "District No. 2". RECITALS WHEREAS, District No. 1 and District No. 2 are each independent government agencies and parties to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, effective July 1, 1985, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of said Joint Agreement, District No. 1 and District No. 2 are each obligated to pay their respective proportionate share of all operation and maintenance expenses incurred for the treatment and disposal of wastewater, together with the capital cost of construction of facilities, and WHEREAS, District No. 1 needs to borrow funds to pay its 1997-98 Fiscal Year obligation to the Joint Funds; and WHEREAS, District No. 2 has funds which are presently not necessary for meeting its financial obligations to the Joint Funds for Fiscal Year 1997-98; and RW:pj:Dafl No.1:01a157 No.5755 1 v WHEREAS, District No. 1 wishes to borrow, and District No. 2 wishes to loan, the sums necessary for District No. 1 to meet its current Fiscal Year obligations for capital facilities construction. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual consideration and benefits, the parties hereto agree as follows- Section o District No. 2 shall loan to District No. 1 the sum of Six Million Three Hundred Thousand ($6,300,000.00) Dollars, which sum shall be transferred by the Director of Finance to the credit of District No. 1 as a matter of record in the capital facilities' accounts and funds of District No. 1. Section : District No. 1 agrees to borrow from District No. 2 the sum of Six Million Three Hundred Thousand ($6,300,000.00) Dollars, and by execution of this Agreement, promises and agrees to pay to District No. 2 said sum, together with interest, calculated on a daily basis at a rate equal to the average rate per annum earned by District No. 2 in its long-term investment portfolios. Said principal and interest shall be paid from the proceeds received by District No. 1 from its issuance of any public debt or similar borrowing-type instrument, including Certificates of Participation, but in no event five (5) years later than the date of execution of this Agreement. Sect o 3: The funds borrowed by District No. 1 shall be used solely for purposes related to its Capital Facilities Funds' obligations. Section 4: This Agreement shall be effective upon approval of the Board of Directors of District No. 1 and the Board of Directors of District No. 2. RW:pj Dr No.2M1 7 N..51 2 y IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed in the name of each District, by its authorized officers, on the day and year first above written. "DISTRICT NO. 1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors "DISTRICT NO. 2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT COUNSEL By TLW:pjD W.1VIMM7 w.5m 3 J AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR INTER-DISTRICT LOANS FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into, to be effective this_day of 1998, by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "District No. 3", AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "District No. 11". RECITALS WHEREAS, District No. 3 and District No. 11 are each independent government agencies and parties to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, effective July 1, 1985, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of said Joint Agreement, District No. 3 and District No. 11 are each obligated to pay their respective proportionate share of all operation and maintenance expenses incurred for the treatment and disposal of wastewater, together with the capital cost of construction of facilities; and WHEREAS, District No. 11 needs to borrow funds to pay its 1997-98 Fiscal Year obligation to the Joint Funds; and nw:vl:o.rtW 1.01n1 sa N.,577N 1 G WHEREAS, District No. 3 has funds which are presently not necessary for meeting its financial obligations to the Joint Funds for Fiscal Year 1997-98, and WHEREAS, District No. 11 wishes to borrow, and District No. 3 wishes to loan, the sums necessary for District No. 11 to meet its current Fiscal Year obligations for capital facilities construction. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual consideration and benefits, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1: District No. 3 shall loan to District No. 11 the sum of Four Million ($4,000,000.00) Dollars, which sum shall be transferred by the Director of Finance to the credit of District No. 11 as a matter of record in the capital facilities' accounts and funds of District No. 11. Section . District No. 11 agrees to borrow from District No. 3 the sum of Four Million ($4,000,000.00) Dollars, and by execution of this Agreement, promises and agrees to pay to District No. 3 said sum, together with interest, calculated on a daily basis at a rate equal to the average rate per annum earned by District No. 3 in its long- term investment portfolios. Said principal and interest shall be paid from the proceeds received by District No. 11 from its issuance of any public debt or similar borrowing- type instrument, including Certificates of Participation, but in no event five (5) years later than the date of execution of this Agreement. Section The funds borrowed by District No. 11 shall be used solely for purposes related to its Capital Facilities Funds obligations. nw:pl:oren No.191al= No.57798 2 Section 4 This Agreement shall be effective upon approval of the Board of Directors of District No. 3 and the Board of Directors of District No. 11. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed in the name of each District, by its authorized officers, on the day and year first above written. "DISTRICT NO. 3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors "DISTRICT NO. 11" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT COUNSEL By RW:pj:�ft No.1IMIM No.5"N 3 -a ,y County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P. O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, December 17, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, December 17, 1997, at the Districts' Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: OTHERS PRESENT: PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel John J.Collins,Joint Chair Ryal Wheeler Peer A. Swan,Vice Joint Chair George Brown,Chair, FAHR STAFF PRESENT: Pat McGuigan,Chair,OMITS Donald F.McIntyre,General Manager Bill Steiner, Director/Supervisor Blake P.Anderson,Assistant General Manager Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary Nancy Wheatley,Director of Technical Services ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap, Chair,PDC APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION: Receive, file and approve draft minutes of the November 22, 1997 Steering Committee meeting. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 Y December 17, 1997 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager received a copy of a letter to LAFCO from IRWD requesting that the hearing on consolidation of the Districts be delayed 60 days so that they have additional time to consider impacts on existing agreements after consolidation. Discussions are continuing between IRWD and the Districts, and a meeting has been scheduled for January 5, 1998 to review IRWD's concerns. It appears that a written understanding should be able to be resolved without holding up the LAFCO process. At the Board meeting, a report will be presented on the impacts of the December 6 storm. Blake Anderson described some of the activities and findings that will be discussed. Nancy Wheatley reported that the draft NPDES permit has finally been received. The changes were briefly discussed. They will be discussed in detail at the December 18 Strategic Plan Ad Hoc Committee. Public workshops are scheduled for January 22 and 23. The hearing is scheduled for Friday, March 6. The permit will be effective 33 days after that date and will be in force for five years. Linda Eisman, Training Manager, has resigned to take a position in Savannah, Georgia. The position will be filled from within the organization. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel requested that an item be added to the closed session on two matters of litigation. The Committee agreed to the addition. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-5) 1. Renaming the Consolidated Districts. Michelle Tuchman reported that there were 38 suggestions received and the list was narrowed to seven. General Counsel indicated that the name of the Districts can be changed at any time during the consolidation process. The consensus of the Steering Committee was to change the name to "Orange County Sanitation District." Action Item: Prepare an Agenda Report for the January Board agenda recommending changing the name of the agency to"Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)." 2. Nancy Wheatley's WEF Trip to Singapore, March 1998. It was moved, seconded and passed to recommend that the Joint Boards approve out-of-country travel by Nancy J. Wheatley; and approve payment of registration fee in the amount of$575 for Nancy J. Wheatley to attend the Water Environment Federation's Technical Conference in Singapore, Asia. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 December 17, 1997 3. Consider recommending the appointment of the General Manager to serve as an alternate director on the Joint CSDOC/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GRS), formerly the OCR Project, for purposes of having quorums at meetings. The motion was moved, seconded and unanimously approved. 4. Labor/Management Committee Meeting—Report of Meeting held on December 15, 1997. The General Manager explained the background leading up to the formation of this Committee. The intent is to have an ongoing relationship with the union representatives to try to avoid confrontations. The unions have expressed concern about DART dealing with meet and confer issues. Joint Chair Collins reported that the meeting was "open"and worth the effort. Basic philosophies and the structure of the committee were discussed. 5. The routine action of reviewing next month's Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees was not held because the Committees are not meeting in January. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Blake Anderson reported on recent activities regarding the bankruptcy. Director Steiner provided insight on behalf of the Board of Supervisors. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for January 28, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. CLOSED SESSION The General Manager reported to the Directors the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 45956.9, to discuss personnel issues. He reported that the item could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the Committee. No other item would be discussed or acted upon. The Committee convened in closed session at 6:50 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 45957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action taken will be publicly reported at the time that the approved action becomes final. At 7:05 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. 6 Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 N December 17, 1997 ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m. Submitted by: �Tappan, Stee o g Committee Secretary /c 17. .Mc JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 1/28/98 I AGENDA REPORT County Sanitatlon Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Prepared by: Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications SUBJECT: Districts' Name Change GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve name change from the "County Sanitation Districts of Orange County" to the "Orange County Sanitation District"to coincide with the July 1, 1998 consolidation date. SUMMARY Consolidation of the Districts affords an opportunity to change our name, should the Joint Boards of Directors so choose. To provide the Board with a list of possible names and to engage the participation of employees, staff was encouraged to submit recommendations. Thirty-eight were received with seven presented to the Steering Committee for consideration during their December 1997 meeting. The Committee recommends for approval the"Orange County Sanitation District." DISCUSSION We have the ability to change our name at any time during the consolidation process, according to legal counsel. FISCAL IMPACT None BUDGETIMPACT The cost of a name change has been factored into the cost of reordering many of our current items. For example, the FY98 budget includes the usual reprinting of some stationery items, including letterhead, envelopes, business forms, business cards, brochures, pamphlets and other materials imprinted with our name. The cost for these items is approximately $25,000. (We have a temporary "hold" on reordering these items pending a name change.) The possibility does exist that we will have to reorder critical items before we have used the stock on hand to meet our July 1 consolidation deadline. Otherwise, the cost of reprinting will be divided between the FY98 and FY99 budgets. mmmmmronmw.�nimz,eww.n.,n,se,".nm.a..aa Page 1 Other items that will eventually need updating include patches on work shirts and jackets. And, while many of the signs located throughout the plants are produced in- house, the larger signs will need to be replaced. A cost has not been determined for signage replacement. CEQA FINDINGS None ALTERNATIVES None ATTACHMENTS None \Ya0},Va181 W p Ole W nn1218N W nIMb1%IutlBoa6i Os q,,,,, �7 Page 2 yi County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenu Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN Thursday, December 18, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on December 18, 1997, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: OTHERS PRESENT: PRESENT: Kellene Bum-Lucht,CDM George Brown,Comm. Chair and Chair, Thomas M. Dawes, Consultant FAHR Director Mark Schwing John Collins,Joint Chair Peer A.Swan,Vice Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT: Jan Debay,Chair, District 5 Don McIntyre, General Manager Burnie Dunlap,Chair, PDC Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager Shirley Dettloff, Chair pro tem, Dist. 11 David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Bill Steiner, Supervisor/Director Michelle Tuchman,Director of Communications Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer ABSENT: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Pat McGuigan,Chair,OMTS Nancy Wheatley,Director of Technical Services Angie Anderson, Principal Engineering Associate Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re r the Strategic Plan jj Page 2 December 18, 1997 t RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the October 23, 1997 Strategic Plan Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported that the new ocean ouffall permit has been received. Because of some of the requirements contained within the draft permit, the assumptions used by our planning staff and our consultant, CDM, will have to be altered. Staff and CDM will use this juncture to reexamine all of the assumptions they have been using for developing the Strategic Plan, and this will change some of the facilities projects contained within the Plan. The General Manager also reported that the original approach to our Strategic Plan efforts has been to project flows and operating conditions to the year 2020. While this is useful for long tern financial and facilities planning purposes, it may cause us to overlook shorter-term opportunities that can allow us to forego up-front funding of certain facilities (and, incidentally, the operating and maintenance costs that are implied by the start up of the facilities). The General Manager reported that staff, in its effort to assemble the Strategic Plan, now sees that the time to adequately review the technical information provided by our consultants, digest it, and convey responses and suggested changes back to them is a larger effort than they had originally assumed. We want to "get it right." That is, with a twenty-year, one billion dollar program ahead of us, it is important that we thoroughly test and evaluate all of the critical underlying assumptions and calculations that will be the underpinnings of our future efforts. In addition, staff is forecasting the future regulatory landscape in light of our draft ocean discharge permit. That information will be conveyed to CDM in January so that its planning assumptions can be adjusted accordingly. For all of the reason cited, the General Manager reported that the schedule, scope, and budget of the Strategic Plan must be amended. Staff estimates that an additional 10- 15% increase in our consultants time will be required. Therefore, staff, in the very near future, will seek authorization for additional funding from the Directors. Nancy Wheatley reported on the changes in the new NPDES permit. The anticipated treatment requirements and costs for the new permit limitations will determine policy. The existing policy requires 50:50 secondary effluent. Any change in this ratio should be done after the EIR process is complete. Reducing the amount of secondary from 50%to the permit limits could save $2.5 million per year in operating costs. The EIR for the Strategic Plan needs to address the mass emissions levels of 20,000 metric tons and/or 25,000 metric tons per year. Additional analyses would be required to reopen the permit to increase to the 25,000 metric ton limit. A focused EIR would have to be prepared. Once water reclamation is on line and more secondary is going to the Water District, the driving factor becomes the concentration of the effluent. The next permit application will have to focus on that issue. A discussion followed on the pros and cons of levels of secondary treatment. Staff will revise the charts before distributing them. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page 3 December 18, 1997 DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-2) 1. Status of the Strategic Plan Gary Streed reported that the FAHR Committee received the RAC report and recommendations. Jim Herberg reported that over 400 EIR Notices of Preparation were mailed. The comment period closed December 4. Jim reviewed some of the comments that were received. Tom Dawes updated the Committee members on the Groundwater Replenishment System (GRS), formerly known as the Orange County Water Reclamation Project (OCR). The Notice of Preparation for the EIR/EIS has been mailed. A project press briefing has been held. The name of the project was changed based on feedback from the focus groups. The next task is to secure grant money, complete the engineering studies and the EIR, Blake Anderson discussed the revised schedule of events. This was changed to give staff time to evaluate all of the technical aspects of the project. The impacts of the six-month delay were discussed. The PAC/RAC members will be notified of the current status and monthly updates will be provided thereafter. The dates for the Board workshops were discussed and scheduled as follows: January 31 New Directors Workshop February 28 Level of Treatment March 14 Energy Management and Strategic Planning Issues 2. Peak Flow Management Blake Anderson discussed some of the issues staff is dealing with at this time, including flow projections and projected average dry weather flows. Decisions need to be made on GRS and meeting the annual mass emission limitation of 20,000 metric tons. Staff is still working on developing average consumption numbers, which will drive a lot of future activities. Staff is actively working with the cities to understand where infiltration occurs. Director Swan suggested a trial study program to install stoppers in manholes above where the meters are installed. The impacts of the GRS project on the level of secondary treatment was discussed. Between the years 2003 and 2020, concentration criteria will drive the amount of secondary. Director Swan discussed the water conservation incentive rate structure implemented by IRWD. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. I � Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page 4 December 18, 1997 OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting will be at the call of the Chair. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 7:10 p.m. Submitted by: e Tappan, Ad Hdb C m�mittee Secretary CenNatllMy GM1W min`G MNONCLBIISIRAiVLMDEC1121B0]mi.�Nn Gx y Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 3 January 21, 1998 In response to Chair Brown's inquiry, Director John Collins (JC) advised that the Steering Committee will meet as regularly scheduled, since most of the Steering Committee members are familiar with the information that will be discussed at the Strategic Plan Review meeting. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff advised that Monday was the last date any of the employees involved in the drug investigation could file a lawsuit against the Districts, due to the statue of limitations in this matter. No additional suits have been filed, and there is only one rase still pending. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS N -21 1. FAHR98-01: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 1998, AND FORWARD TO THE JOINT BOARDS 2. FAHR98-02: Receive and file Certificates Of Participation (COP) Report END OF CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 1 through 2 under"Consent Calendar." ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 3 -7) 3. FAHR98-03: Approve Resolution No. XX, Approving Revisions to the Deferred Compensation Program for the Executive Management Group Employees (General Manager, Assistant General Managers and Department Heads) and Management, Professional and Supervisory Employees of the Districts, and Repealing Resolution No. 95-81 Director John Collins (JC) requested that his abstention from discussion and voting on this matter be made a matter of record, as well as his absence from the conference room during the Committee's consideration of this item. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, reviewed the proposed two revisions to the Districts' existing Deferred Compensation Program, which are to 1) remove the 3-year vesting period which he has determined to be in conflict with the California Supreme Court decision in Ventura; and 2) a non-substantive language change which redefines employer"contributions"to"supplementary salary"in order to satisfy the requirements of law as set forth by the Supreme Court. This will allow employer contributions to continue to be counted towards "final compensation"for Districts'employees in the Orange County Employees Retirement System. Discussion took place regarding the pros and cons of the three options presented to the Committee, the differences between 401K and 457 plans, the difference in the way the private and public sectors allocate their matching benefit portions of these plans to retirement funds, and the legality of making the recommended changes. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve Option No. 1, to do nothing, with the stipulation that we do not include the employer matching funds benefit in employee salary calculations to OCERS for final compensation purposes. W Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 January 21, 1998 V Director Swan requested that staff solicit a third opinion on the Plan and vesting requirements. 4. FAHR98-04: Approve Ordinance No. 135, Providing For an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as Authorized by the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04 COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Human Resources Director Mike Peterman reported that the proposed Ordinance would provide an early retirement incentive program to eligible Districts' employees as authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, and Government Code Section 31641.04. The Districts' Five-Year Staffing Plan calls for the reduction of an additional 25 employees. The Boards approved all Early Retirement Incentive Programs brought before them for each of the last three fiscal years. During those three years, 26 employees have retired early with only three positions refilled. The Districts' estimated savings are expected to be $4.4 million through fiscal year 1999. Discussion look place regarding early retirement incentives used in the private sector. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried, with one no vote, to recommend that the Joint Boards approve Ordinance No. 135, Providing For an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as Authorized by the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04 5. FAHR98-05: Approve the assignment of the implementation portion of the J. D. Edwards Financial Information System (FIS) Contract to Enterprise Technologies COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Controller Mike White gave an overview of the Districts' Financial Information System (FIS) implementation program and the costs previously authorized by the Joint Boards for this project for hardware, software licenses, system installation, training and data conversion Since the Financial Information System agreement was entered into with J.D. Edwards in October of 1996, various changes in the company's strategies has led to a decline in the overall project management services provided to the Districts. J.D. Edwards has encouraged us to replace them with one of their business partners. Therefore, the Finance Department conducted interviews with three of J.D. Edwards' business partners. Of the three, Enterprise Technologies was determined to be the best firm to complete the project. During discussion, the Committee had numerous questions regarding the J.D. Edwards contract, whether legal action should be taken against them, whether all or part of their contract will be assigned. The Committee questioned the reasons for the change in the project completion date, and the specifics of the original contract. The Committee was interested in obtaining background information on Enterprise Technologies, how many people will be working on the project, if it is assigned to them, the number of hours they plan to work on the project and estimated costs. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried, with one no vole, to table this hem to the February meeting. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 January 21, 1998 The Committee requested that staff provide them with an abstract of the contract, a cost analysis of what has been spent, what has been obligated, how much is left. They requested schedules showing how much of the work has been completed and a background report on Enterprise Technologies. It was also requested that staff invite the owner of Enterprise Technologies to attend the next meeting to answer questions of the Committee. 6. FAHR98-06: 1. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc., for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan Treatment, Disposal and Reuse Plan, Job No. J-40-3, to provide additional planning and design services in the amount of$397,239, for a total amount not to exceed $1,085,749; and 2. Extend the contract duration for an additional six months to April 1999. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor, gave an overview of the project and the additional work proposed in Addendum No. 2. He advised that the issues have been discussed with the Ad Hoc Committee and they have concurred with staffs analysis and proposed revisions to the project. Total additional fees for the work is $397,239, approximately 15% of CDM's existing budget for Phases 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan. Additional Work Items consist of Planning/Permit Assumptions $299,233; Additional Public Participation (PAC 2) $46,969 and Rate Structure Issues$51,037. Technical Services Director Nancy Wheatley advised that the EPA requirements regarding the discharge requirements is a very important part of the change. Staff clarified that the changes to the project concern Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Joint Boards approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc., for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan (Treatment, Disposal and Reuse Plan), Job No. J-40-3, to provide additional planning and design services in the amount of$397,239, for a total amount not to exceed $1,085,749; and 2. Extend the contract duration for an additional six months to April 1999 7. FAHR98-07: Award contract for Job No. P2-70, Replacement of Construction Management Trailers at Plant No. 2, to Space Leasing Company, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $183,989 MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Joint Boards award the contract for Job No. P2-70, Replacement of Construction Management Trailers at Plant No. 2, to Space Leasing Company, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $183,989 INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS None. CLOSED SESSION There was no dosed session. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 January 21, 1998 v: OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY None. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 11, 1998, at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:58 p.m. Submitted by.A. `` �/ M _' e L9'�lQ.l l/lW�-/ Len ra Crane Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Secretary \\RADOMDATAI\WR DTAIANVO CRANETAHRTAHR99UANA-99MIKDOC FAHR COMMITTEE "ee112 g [e Tcx.ea:. Ol/21/g8 01/29/ge AGENDA REPORT ItemNumEer IemNumbe`` /• /.SIC J County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: Treasurers Report for the month of December 1997 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of December 1997. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), has served as the Districts' professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust as the Districts' third- party custodian, since September 1995. The Districts' Investment Policy, adopted by the Joint Boards, includes reporting requirements as listed down the leftmost column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The Districts' external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Districts' Investment Policy. The Districts' portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) 1YMm1G•Y1Vj.ftft 1V .Wro HWWRBA4NFAHRB 1. RM 1m7m Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long- term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of December 1997 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the Districts' custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. During the month of December, the Districts received $17 million through the Orange County Tax Collector's property tax allocation cycle. The funds were deposited to the Districts' Long-Term portfolio for investment. The table below details the book balances of the Districts' funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts December 31, 1997 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $16,367,571 5.7 Union Bank Checking Amount 390,120 4.9 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 198,000 5.1 Bank of America Checking Account 74,594 4.1 Bank of America Money Market Account 127,833 4.0 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 17,386,022 5.5 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 295,309,523 5.6 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 15.127 5.6 Debt service Reserves @ Trustees 33,082,055 6.2 Petty Cash 4,400 — Defemed Compensation 11,446,289 (0.13)-M.06 TOTAL 37d 401.5 ALTERNATIVES None. CEGA FINDINGS None. �weo,imutby man�IlvewlFuIMFUBmBwmFAMaB6of.ax rmrW Page 2 9 ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Reports GGS:SKIc IMlonldmlMRGMfin1'llOrnnelFMd1FR11P091VJ11FA11PBBG1.Eoc n 1W7W Page ,.7:n TT WNI � \ iouuiri \\\ . . %////. %////. %////. \\ Moo ..... ..... ..... !.... ;.;.;.;.; •O.•pp, •❖•••,•. ••.•••.•., ••••❖••, ;O.•00, ;••••••••, '•'•'•'•'� '•'•'•'•'• !'•'•••'•' X!❖.-*o 'o❖.❖. �.❖.❖. ..... ..... ..... !.... !.... !......... ..... !.... ..... ..... ..... ❖., .,.,.❖., ❖.•.�.•, ,❖.❖.� �••••❖.•., , N .❖.•.�., .�.�.❖., ❖.❖, :❖.❖., ❖.�.� XXXXN ❖. ❖.,.,.•. !.... ...., ..... ..... !•o.❖a :o•.❖a !.❖.•.o :❖.❖o o.❖.moo •.�.,.,.,. a : . : MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 December 1997) Liquid Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: p�MM $17387,076 Me11ConO $17:386,022 Historical Cost: PIMCO $17,387,076 Mellon $17,389,997 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.07 Of Index: 0.20 15.13 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $12,327(0.07%) 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0"/0 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 100% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return (%): 1 Month: 0.49 3 Months: 1.40 12 Months: 5.63 Year-to-Date: 5.63 Index Total Rate of Return (%): 1 Month: 0.43 A MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING (for the month ending 31 December 1997) Long Term Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current MarketValue Estimate: ggZZggS5 55 55gg • Mellon0 $295;380;521 Historical Cost: PIMCO $294,676,421 Mellon $294,710,368 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.19 Of Index: 2.30 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $6,594,723 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 00/0 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 0.80 3 Months: 1.95 12 Months: 7.87 Year-to-Date: 7.87 Index Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 0.74 A OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-DEC-1997 H81100 % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.70 0.70 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,361,079.10 2,361,079.10 13.41% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3,157,099.33 3,1S7 099.33 17.93% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 2,662,858.55 2,662:358.55 1S.13% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 2,371,818.00 2,371,818.00 13.47% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 3,243,357.92 3,243,357.92 18.42% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 190,962.00 190,862.00 1.08% 0.00 7,1S7.33 3.75 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 13,987,075.60 13,987,075.60 79.45% 0.00 7,1S7.33 O.OS FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,402,921.88 3,398,946.00 19.31% -3,975.88 191,250.00 5.63 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,402,921.88 3,398,946.00 19.31% -3,975.88 191,2SO.00 S.63 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 219,554.18 219,554.18 1.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 219,554.18 219,554.18 1.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 17,609,551.66 17,605,575 78 100.00% -3,975.88 198,407.33 1.13 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-DEC-1997 HB1100 % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.59 0.59 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -74 889,331.91 -74,889,331.91 -24.89% 0.00 0.00 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - DOME 13:494,275.00 13,503,687.53 4.49% 9,412.53 803,250.00 SAS COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 9,895,299.50 9,895,299.50 3.29% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 432,707.00 432,707.00 0.14% 0.00 16,226.51 3.75 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS -51,067,049.82 -51,057,637.29 -16.97% 9,412.53 819,476.51 -1.61 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 170,967,630.62 171,628,357.66 57.03% 760,727.04 11,232,510.09 6.54 U.S. AGENCIES 112,095,609.13 112.370,814.00 37.34% 275,204.87 7,254,890.00 6.46 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 10,526,781.46 10,585,730.78 3.52% 58,949.32 700,310.19 6.62 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGA 3,492,480.47 3,500,274.05 1.16% 7,793.58 216,650.00 6.19 ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 568,097.74 568,799.92 0.19% 702.18 35,222.06 6.19 BANKING & FINANCE 37,291,179.40 37,202,174.05 12.36% -89 005.35 2,400,112.47 6.45 INDUSTRIAL 10,935,640.00 10,511,010.00 3.49% -424:630.00 909,400.00 8.65 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 345,777,418.82 346,367,160.46 115.10% 589,741.64 22,749,094.91 6.57 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 5,630,467.82 5,630,467.82 1.87% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 5,630,467.82 5,630,467.82 1.87% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 300,340,836.82 300,939,990.99 100.00% 599,154.17 23,558,571.32 7.83 Page 1 YLDAMOL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 1 OCSF07511102 1997/12/31 RUN DATE v 01/07/98 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME v 15.40.49 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH R CASH EQUIVALENTS , 190,862.00 BSOT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 190,862.00 1.36 999495906 PUBLIC II 190,862.00 1.10 3,000,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS SYS DISC 5.488 .000 P-1 98.218 2,946,549.17 21.06 313313SA7 01/20/1998 2,946,549.17 16.95 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 5.555 .000 P-1 98.826 2,371,818.00 16.95 313385SP2 MAT OVOV1998 2,371,618.00 IS." 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 5.605 .000 P-1 98.664 2,367,926.00 16.92 313397TM4 RAT OV20/1993 2,567,926.00 13.62 2,600,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 5.605 .000 P-1 98.679 2,565,644.16 18.34 313589RV7 MAT 01/15/1998 2,565,644.16 14.76 300,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK DISC NTS 5.610 .000 P-1 98.936 296,808.75 2.12 313313RV2 01/15/1998 296,808.75 1.71 800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.625 .000 P-1 98.674 789,393.33 5.64 65743DA84 01/08/1998 789,393.33 4.54 B00,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.635 .000 97.961 783,685.33 5.60 36959JAU7 01/28/1998 763,685.33 4.51 100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HIS ASSN DISC 5.668 .00D P-1 97.214 97,214.39 .69 313589YG2 MAT 06/19/1998 97,214.39 .56 800,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN KID CORP DISC 5.677 .000 P-1 98.647 789,173.33 5." 31339M6 MAT 03/26/1996 789,175.33 4.54 800,000.00 FORD MR CR CO DISC 6.024 .000 MR 98.500 786,000.44 5.63 34539UAE2 01/14/1998 788,000.44 4.53 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.451 .078 13,987,074.90 100.00 13,987,074.90 80.46 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.314 5.627 AAA 99.969 3,402,921.88 100.00 912827J45 05.625X 01/31/1998 DO OU01/93 3,398,946.00 19.55 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE t 2 OCSF07511102 1997/12/31 RUN DATE : 02/07/96 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 15.40.49 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.324 5.627 3,402,921.86 100.00 3,396,946.00 19.55 TOTAL 5.446 .258 17,389,996.78 100.00 17,386,020.90 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 UCSF07522202 1997/12/31 RUN DATE 01/07/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME , 15.40.49 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ Y. TYPE SECURITY 1S SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE Y. TOTAL ----------------- ------------------- --------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 1 CASH EQUIVALENTS 432,707.00 BSOT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 432,707.00 1.81 999495906 PUBLIC II 432,707.00 .12 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.653 .000 P-1 98.714 808,421.50 3.72 63743BACS 01/12/1998 988,421.50 .24 3,300,000.OD GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.696 .000 P-1 98.843 3,261,809.84 13.68 36959JAPS 01/23/1996 3,261,809.84 .88 1,000,000.00 BELLSOUTN TELECOM DISC 5.762 .000 P-1 98.923 989,233.33 4.15 07815KB80 02/11/1998 989,233.33 .27 2,1DO,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.774 .000 P-1 98.890 2,076,604.17 8.71 36959JAM3 01/22/1998 2,076,684.17 .56 11500,000.00 IBM DISC 5.785 .000 P-1 99.045 1,455,675.00 6.23 44922BB64 02/06/1998 1,465,675.00 .40 60D,CDO.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DIX 5.828 .000 99.ml 596,043.50 2.50 36959JACY 01/12/1998 596,043.50 .16 500,000.00 DO PONT BE NEMOUR DISC 5.858 .000 P-1 99.514 497,570.83 2.08 26354BAU6 01/28/1998 497,570.85 .13 13,500,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/O 5.994 5.948 100.027 13,494,275.00 56.66 0663JOKU7 05.9502 06/19/1998 DO 06/19/97 13,503,687.53 3.65 100,000.00 IBM DISC 6.249 .000 P-1 99.861 99,861.55 .41 449220A81 01/00/1998 99,861.33 .03 -------- ------- ----------------- -_------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.548 1.838 23,822,281.50 100.00 23,831,694.03 6.44 FINED INCOME SECURITIES 4,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN TRANCHE STR 96 .000 5.625 Al 100.453 3,970,480.00 1.16 M540MZI FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DD 11/08/93 4,018,120.00 1.09 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN IN 0 00177 .000 5.517 Al 99.667 6,999,746.00 2.04 345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 7,077,777.00 1.91 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE e 4 OCSF07522202 1997/12/31 RUN DATE 1 01/07/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 13.40.49 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ----"-- --.......... ---------- 7,062.580.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.654 3.643 AAA 99.500 7,053,542.97 2.02 9128273U 3.6257. 07/15/2002 OD 07/14/97 7,027,267.10 1.90 5,099,750.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.717 3.466 AAA 97.375 4,966,678.40 1.43 912627M3 3.3757.. 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 4,965,881.56 1.34 15,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.562 5.865 AM 100.172 15,045,117.19 4.33 912827Z70 05.875X 10/31/1998 DO 10/31/96 15,625,800.00 4.06 52,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.771 6.748 AM 101.875 53,755,691.40 15.52 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 53,790,000.00 14.53 3,500,000.O0 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.415 AAA 103.281 3,613,203.13 1.04 9328272SO 06.625Y. 04/30/2002 DD 04/50/97 3,614,835.00 .95 27,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.828 7.074 MA 106.016 29,002,130.55 8.38 912827OU 07.500% 11/15/2001 00 11/15/91 29,048,384.00 7.85 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MTN 5.871 5.870 MA 100.031 5,000,781.25 1.44 31364FFMS S.BSOX 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 5,001,550.00 1.35 4,421,524.98 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-D CL A 5.957 5.904 MA 99.939 4,412,371.05 1.27 161614AE2 5.9007. 11/15/2001 DO ll/1S/95 4,418,827.85 1.19 28,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.094 6.315 AAA 102.922 28,468,923.23 8.32 912827VI 06.500Y. 05/31/2002 OD 06/02/97 28,818,160.00 7.78 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA 6.101 6.170 AAA 100.000 9,978,125.OD 2.88 999U6619 6.170Z 01/25/2028 10,000,000.00 2.70 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONGS 6.162 8.869 AAA 125.437 61233,593.75 1.81 922810DES 11.125% 08/15/2OD3 OD 07/05/83 61271,050.O0 1.69 568,097.75 FIF7M THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.192 AAA 100.124 568,097.74 .16 31677EAA4 6.2OOX 09/91/2001 DO 03/15/96 S6B,799.92 .15 3,500,000.00 CONTIHORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 6.213 6.190 AAA 100.008 3,492,480.47 1.01 2107SWMS 6.190% 10/15/2011 DD 11/23/96 3,500,274.05 .95 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.277 6.158 AAA 101.828 4,994,531.Z5 1.46 9128272LS 06.2507. OU28/2002 OD OV28/97 5,091,400.00 1.38 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL "TO ASSN MTN 6.291 6.147 AAA 101.344 4,486,705.00 1.31 - 31364CKV5 6.2307.. 03/01/2002 00 03/03/97 4,560,480.00 1.23 VLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF07522202 1997/12/31 RUN DATE , 01/07/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME , 15.40.49 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOWL YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __-_______ 39,60D,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BOB 6.305 6.492 AAA 99.969 39,890,500.00 11.42 313391586 6.4901 09/13/2000 DD 09/13/95 39,547,724.00 10.69 1,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN 0 TR 00491 6.305 7.672 A2 100.233 1.031,840.08 .28 812MXUJS 7.690% 02/27/1998 OD OV28/95 1.002,330.99 .27 4,500,000.00 CATERPILLAR FIML MTHS TR00389 6.322 5.789 A2 99.841 4,466,745.00 1.29 14912LSE2 8.780% 07/15/1998 GO 1VIS19S 4,492,045.08 1.21 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLOGS MTN 000196 6.364 6.699 BAR1 208.625 5103914".00 1.45 52517PJ04 6.6502 11/08/2000 DO II/98/96 5,951.259.08 1.36 4,484,481.95 GNM1 II POOL 20060023 6.375 6.334 AAA 242.625 4.555,756.19 1.32 36225CAZ9 6.SOOY. 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 4.6021199.60 1.24 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC SR HTS 6.425 6.664 A2 101.204 1,317,619.35 .38 0739OZAWS 6.7502 05/01/2001 DD 04/26/96 1.321.756.29 .36 17,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.449 7.330 AAA 105.734 17,734,215.75 5.18 912827IK3 07.760% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 17,974.780.60 4.86 1,000,000.00 CNRYSLER FIML MTM TR 0 00355 6.514 6.249 A3 240.172 993.160.00 .28 171200PYI 6.260% 07/20/1998 DO 07/18/95 1,002,720.00 .27 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 6.528 6.939 AM 100.875 9,998,SS9.38 2.91 999ABT4 7.000% 01/15/2026 10,087,500.00 2.72 3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP KTN TROD324 6.532 8.174 A3 102.460 3,921,640.00 1.09 37042RPM8 6.375Y. 02/03/1999 DO 0/05/95 3,791,020.00 1.02 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN MTN 6.577 6.483 AAA 102.187 8,012,576.00 2.36 31364CBD9 6.6257. 04/18/2001 OD 04/18/96 8,174,960.00 2.21 2,900,000.00 CNRYSLER FINL MTN TR 9 00306 6.591 7.244 A3 100.362 2,952,696.00 .84 171200NT4 7.270% 04/13/1998 DO 04/15/95 2,910.498.00 .79 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS HT 6.593 8.755 A2 105.652 9,9D3,760.00 2.74 71aI54OB2 9.2507. 02/15/2000 9,506,680.00 2.57 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL HATL MTB ASSN MTN 6.636 5.726 AM 98.500 9,593,750.00 2.84 31364BVF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DD OU20/96 9,850,000.OD 2.66 3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 6.660 8.245 A3 104.612 3,227,070.00 .90 37042RK04 8.6251 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95 3,138,360.00 .85 YLOAKAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 6 0CSF07522202 1997/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/98 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 15.48.49 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MTG CORP BEGS 6.713 6.071 AAA :98.672 4:851.562.50 2.42 31S4AGWO 5.990X OV06/2001 DD 03/06/% 4,933,600.00 1.33 20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FMLMC GOLD 6.745 6.939 AAA 100.875 20:261,250.00 5.82 999MV993 7.000% 01/15/2027 20,175:000.00 3.45 5,840,269.37 CNMA I1 POOL 8080048K 6.826 6.832 AAA 102.453 5,968,025.27 1.72 36225CC20 7.0002 06/20/2027 OD 06/01/97 5,983,531.18 1.62 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.554 6.403 345,777,418.02 100.00 346,367,160.46 93.66 _____ ______________ ______-__ TOTAL 5.554 6.343 369,599,700.32 200.00 370,198,854.49 200.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 02-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 RECD FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR 18-DEC-1997 17,000,000.00 17,000,000.00 0.000000 NA9123459 ----------- 17,000.000.00 0.00 0.000000 CD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FRN97 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FRN97 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FRN97 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FRN97 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FSEE4 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2833 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FSEE4 FHLMC GROUP #DB-2833 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FSN61 FHLMC GROUP #D8-3113 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FTLO6 FHLMC GROUP #DB-3924 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FTPY6 FHLMC GROUP #D8-4039 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FTQRO FHLMC GROUP #D8-4064 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FTORO FHLMC GROUP #D8-4064 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3128FTQRO FHLMC GROUP #DS-4064 ----------- -3.00 0.D0 0.000000 cw 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 09-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827D25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128272WI U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 064S00% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 02-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273D2 U 5 TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/1S/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 19-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 99345GS30 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 Page 2 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ____ ___________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ __________________ CW 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 23-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9934SH082 WIRE FEES FROM 12-22 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 OS.S60% 12/22/1997 DD 12/19/97 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 23-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 99345H9S9 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.610% 12/23/1997 DO 12/22/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 26-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9934SK044 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw OS.550% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 29-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9934SL604 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 Cw 05.460% 12/29/1997 DD 12/26/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 TO REVERSE 18-NOV-1997 36.00 36.00 0.000000 999ABK443 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 36.00 0.00 0.000000 CWC 7.000% 11/15/2027 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 ABBOTT LABS DISC 03-DEC-1997 -598,061.00 -598,061.00 99.676833 00282AZQ2 12/24/1997 03-DEC-1997 598,061.00 598,061.00 99.676833 B BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA, SAN F ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 ABBOTT LABS DISC 03-DEC-1997 -598,061.00 -598,061.00 99.676833 00282AZQ2 12/24/1997 03-DEC-1997 -598,061.00 0.00 99.676833 FC BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA, SAN F 03-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,S00,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 16-DEC-1997 -3,499,055.00 -3,499,05S.00 99.973000 066330KU7 05.950% 06/19/1998 DO 06/19/97 17-DEC-1997 3,499,055.00 3,499,055.00 99.973000 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NV 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 3 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USE, 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 16-DEC-1997 -104,703.47 -104,703.47 99.973000 066310KU7 05.950% 06/19/1998 DO 06/19/97 17-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 99.973000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 16-DEC-1997 -3,603,7SB.47 -3,603,758.47 99.973000 06631OKU7 05.950% 06/19/1998 DO 06/19/97 17-DEC-1997 -3,603,758.47 0.00 99.973000 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 17-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,000,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 05-DEC-1997 -989,233.33 -989,233.33 98.923333 07815KBBO 02/11/1998 05-DEC-1997 989,233.33 989,233.33 98.923333 B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1.000,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 05-DEC-1997 -989,233.33 -989.233.33 98.923333 07815KBBO 02/11/1998 05-DEC-1997 -989,233.33 0.00 98.923333 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 05-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 29-DEC-1997 -497,570.83 -497,570.83 99.514166 26354BAU6 01/28/1998 29-DEC-1997 497,570.83 497,S70.83 99.514166 B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500 000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 29-DEC-1997 -497,570.83 -497,570.83 99.514166 26154BAU6 01/28/1998 29-DEC-1997 -497,570.83 0.00 99.514166 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 29-DEC-1997 -789,173.33 -789,173.33 98.646666 313397UT6 MAT 03/26/1998 29-DEC-1997 789,173.33 789,173.33 98.646666 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 29-DEC-1997 -789,173.33 -789,173.33 98.646666 313397UT6 MAT 03/26/1998 29-DEC-1997 -789,173.33 0.00 98.646666 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Page 4 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 100 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-DEC-1997 -97,214.39 -97,214.39 97.214388 33.H89YG2 MAT 06/19/1998 19-DEC-1997 97,214.39 97,214.39 97.214388 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-DEC-1997 -97,214.39 -97,214.39 97.214388 313589YG2 MAT 06/19/1998 19-DEC-1997 -97,214.39 0.00 97.214388 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-DEC-1997 -596,043.50 -596,043.50 99.340583 369597AC7 01/12/1998 02-DEC-1997 596,043.50 596,043.50 99.340583 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-DEC-1997 -596,043.50 -596,043.50 99.340583 36959DAC7 01/12/1998 02-DEC-1997 -596,043.50 0.00 99.340583 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 02-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 IBM DISC 31-DEC-1997 -99,861.33 -99,861.33 99.861333 44922BA81 01/08/1998 31-DEC-1997 99,861.33 99,861.33 99.861333 B MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 IBM DISC 31-DEC-1997 -99,861.33 -99,861.33 99.861333 44922BA81 01/08/1998 31-DEC-1997 -99,861.33 0.00 99.861333 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOUT SECS/MONEY 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 IBM DISC 08-DEC-1997 -1,485,675.00 -1,485,675.00 99.045000 449226064 02/06/1998 08-DEC-1997 1,485,675.00 1,485,675.00 99.045000 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500 000.00 IBM DISC 08-DEC-1997 -1,485,675.00 -1,485,675.00 99.045000 44422BB64 02/06/1998 08-DEC-1997 -1,485,675.00 0.00 99.045000 FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 18-DEC-1997 -17,000,000.00 -17,000,000.00 100.000000 99345GS30 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 18-DEC-1997 17,000,000.00 17,000,000.00 100.000000 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NV 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 5 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 18-DEC-1997 -17,000,000.00 -17,000,000.00 100.000000 99345G530 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 18-DEC-1997 -17,000,000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 18-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 19-DEC-1997 -17,100,000.00 -17.100 000.00 100.000000 99345H082 OS.560% 12/22/1997 DO 12/19/97 19-DEC-1997 17,100,000.00 17,100:000.00 100.000000 B LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC. NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 19-DEC-1997 -27,100,000.00 -17,100,000.00 100.000000 99345H082 OS.S60% 12/22/1997 DO 12/19/97 19-DEC-1997 -17,100,000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,300 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-DEC-1997 -17 300,000.00 -17.300,000.00 100.000000 99�i45H959 05.610% 12/23/1997 DO 12/22/97 22-DEC-1997 17:300,000.00 17,300,000.00 100.000000 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17.300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-DEC-1997 -17,300,000.00 -17,300,000.00 100.000000 99345H959 05.610% 12/23/1997 OD 12/22/97 22-DEC-1997 -17,300.000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC, NY 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,800,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 23-DEC-1997 -16,800.000.00 -16,800,000.00 100.000000 99345K044 OS.SSD% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 23-DEC-1997 16,800,000.00 16,800,000.00 100.000000 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,800,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 23-DEC-1997 -16,800,000.00 -16,800,000.00 100.000000 9934SK044 05.550% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 23-DEC-1997 -16,800,000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 23-DEC-2997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,100 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-DEC-1997 -9,100,000.00 -9.100,000.00 100.000000 99PSL604 05.460% 12/29/1997 DO 12/26/97 26-DEC-1997 9,100,000.00 9,100.000.00 100.000000 B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO Page 6 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST •• CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ 9,100 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-DEC-1997 -9,100,000.00 -91100,000.00 100.000000 99145L604 05.460% 12/29/1997 DO 12/26/97 26-DEC-1997 -9,100,000.00 0.00 100.000000 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 418.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-DEC-1997 -418.00 -418.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC ii 01-DEC-1997 418.00 418.00 1.000000 B 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 914,724.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-DEC-1997 -914,724.00 -914,724.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-DEC-1997 914,724.00 914,724.00 1.000000 B 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 86,887.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 08-DEC-1997 -86,887.00 -86,887.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC ii 08-DEC-1997 86,887.00 86,887.00 1.000000 B 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 5,277.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 11-DEC-1997 -5,277.00 -5,277.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 11-DEC-1997 5,277.00 5.277.00 1.000000 B 11-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 281,619.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 15-DEC-1997 -281 619.00 -281,619.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 15-DEC-1997 281:619.00 281,619.00 1.000000 e 15-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 107,295.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 17-DEC-1997 -107,29S.00 -107,29S.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC I1 17-DEC-1997 107,295.00 107,295.00 1.000000 B 17-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,786.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 19-DEC-1997 -2,786.00 -2,786.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC i1 19-DEC-1997 2,786.00 2,786.00 1.000000 B 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO S7,985.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 22-DEC-1997 -57,985.00 -S7,985.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 22-DEC-1997 57,985.00 57,985.00 1.000000 B 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 7 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO S06 302.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 26-DEC-1997 -506,302.00 -506,302.00 1.000000 994495906 PUBLIC ii 26-DEC-1997 S06,302.00 506,302.00 1.000000 B 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10 826.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 29-DEC-1997 -10,826.00 -10,826.00 1.000000 994495906 PUBLIC II 29-DEC-1997 10,826.00 10,926.00 1.000000 B 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100 189.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 30-DEC-1997 -100,18900 -100,189.00 1.000000 994495906 PUBLIC II 30-DEC-1997 100,189:00 100,189.00 1.000000 B 30-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 05-DEC-1997 -1,317,619.35 -1,317,619.35 100.967000 073902AW8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 10-DEC-1997 1,317,619.35 1,317,619.35 100.967000 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 05-DEC-1997 -9,542.81 -9,542.81 100.967000 073902AW8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.967000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1.305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 05-DEC-1997 -1,327,162.16 -1,327,162.16 100.967000 073902AW8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 10-DEC-1997 -1,327,162.16 0.00 100.967000 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 23-DEC-1997 -3 492 480.47 -3,492,480.47 99.78S1S6 21075WDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 29-DEC-1997 3:492:480.47 3,492,480.47 99.785156 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 3,S00,000.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 23-DEC-1997 -16,8S0.56 -16,850.56 99.785156 21075WDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 Do 11/23/96 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 99.785156 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 __-- Page 8 « .. OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 THIN BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500,000.00 CONTIRORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 23-DEC-1997 -3,509,331.03 -3,509,331.03 99.785156 21075NDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 29-DEC-1997 -3,509,331.03 0.00 99.785156 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 568,097.75 FIFTH THIRD SK AUTO TR 96A CLA 18-DEC-1997 -568,097.74 -568,097.74 99.999998 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 23-DEC-1997 568,097.74 568,097.74 99.999998 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 568,097.75 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 18-DEC-1997 -782.71 -782.71 99.999998 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 99.999998 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 568,097.75 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 18-DEC-1997 -568,880.45 -568,880.45 99.999998 31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 23-DEC-1997 -568,880.45 0.00 99.999998 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN #00196 23-DEC-1997 -5,039,450.00 -5.039,450.00 100.789000 52517PID4 6.650% 11/08/2000 DO 11/08/96 29-DEC-1997 5,039.450.00 5,039,450.00 100.789000 B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN #00196 23-DEC-1997 -123,763.89 -123,763.89 100.789000 52517PID4 6.650% 11/08/2000 DO 11/08/96 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.789000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN #00196 23-DEC-1997 -5,163,213.89 -5,163,213.89 100.7B9000 52517PID4 6.650% 11/08/2000 DD 11/08/96 29-DEC-1997 -5,163,213.89 0.00 100.789000 FC LEHMAN BROS INC 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -7.406,875.00 -7,406,875.00 105.812500 912827zx3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 7,406,875.00 7,406,875.00 105.812500 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -193.118.21 -193,118.21 105.812500 912827zx3 07.7SO% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 105.812500 Page 9 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY CODEID/ DESCRIPTION/BROKER COMPLSETTLE DATEDATE/ GAINCOST/ LOSS CORR GAIN GAIN LOSS/ GAINLOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -7 599 993 21 -7,599,993.21 105.812500 912827ZX3 07.750% 02/15/2001 Do 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 -7:599:993:21 0.G0 105.812500 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 24-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 7,406,875.00 7,406,875.00 105.812500 912827ZX3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 -7,406,875.00 -7,406,875.00 105.812500 BC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 193,118.21 193,118.21 105.812500 9D827ZX3 07.750% 02/1S/2001 DO 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 105.812500 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 7,599,993.21 7,S99,993.21 105.812500 911827ZX3 07.7SO% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 7,599,993.21 0.00 IOS.812500 FCC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 24-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -7,406,875.00 -7,406,875.00 105.812500 912827ZX3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 26-DEC-1997 7,406,875.00 7,406.875.00 105.812500 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,000 00000 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -196,066.58 -196,066.58 105.812500 93N27iO 07.7SO% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 105.812500 18 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7.000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -7,602,941.58 -7,602,941.58 105.812500 91H27ZX3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 26-DEC-1997 -7,602,941.58 0.00 105.812500 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-2997 -3,698,157.60 -3 698,157.60 102.726600 9128272WI 06.500% OS/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 23-IAN-1998 3,698,157.60 3:698,157.60 102.726600 e MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 10 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE' USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XKATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3.600,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-1997 -34,714.29 -34,714.29 102.726600 9128272w1 06.500% OS/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 23-1AN-1998 0.00 0.00 102.726600 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35.000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-NOV-1997 -35,813,415.95 -35,813,415.95 100.563176 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 01-DEC-1997 -35,813,415.95 0.00 100.563176 FC BANK OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20p000,OOO.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-NOV-1997 -20,250.000.00 -20 250 000.00 101.250000 999ABT030 7.000% 12/15/2027 22-DEC-1997 20,250.000.00 20:250:000.00 101.250000 B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-NOV-1997 -20p2SO,000.00 -20,250,000.00 101.250000 999ABT030 7.000% 12/15/2027 22-DEC-1997 -20,250,000.00 0.00 101.250000 FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 18-NOV-1997 -9,971,875.00 -9,971,875.00 99.718750 999AST113 6.080% 12/25/2027 23-DEC-1997 -9,971,875.00 0.00 99.718750 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC. NY 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 -2,755,156.25 -2,755,156.25 100.187500 994ABT444 7.000% 01/15/2028 14-1AN-1998 2,755,156.25 2,755,156.25 100.187500 B GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-DEC-1997 -20.281,250.00 -20,281,250.00 101.406250 999ABV993 7.000% 01/15/2027 26-]AN-1998 20,281,250.00 20,281,250.00 101.406250 B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 05-NOV-1997 -2,753,437.50 -2,753,437.50 100.125000 999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 -2,753,437.50 0.00 100.125000 FC GREENWICH 11-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS RANSA TIONS- 31 DEC/997 TM100 USD BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 17 500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 1S-JUL-1997 -17,500.00 -17 500.00 100.000000 91f8273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-7UL-1997 17,500.00 17:500.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,S00.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT IS-JUL-1997 -17,50000 -17,500.00 100.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-JUL-1997 -17,500:00 0.00 100.000000 FC 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 ABBOTT LABS DISC 10-DEC-1997 598,061.00 598,061.00 99.676833 00282AZQ2 12/24/1997 10-DEC-1997 -598,062.00 -598,061.00 99.676833 S LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -600,000.00 ABBOTT LABS DISC 10-DEC-1997 644.00 644.00 99.676833 00282AZQ2 12/24/1997 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 99.676833 is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 ABBOTT LABS DISC 10-DEC-1997 S98,705.00 598,705.00 99.676833 00282AZQ2 12/24/1997 10-DEC-1997 598,705.00 0.00 99.676833 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600 000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-DEC-1997 593,OS6.33 S93 056.33 98.842721 36659JAP8 01/23/1998 10-DEC-1997 -S93,OS6.33 -593:056.33 98.842721 S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600 000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-DEC-1997 2,653.67 2,653.67 98.842721 364593APS 01/23/1998 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 98.842721 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-DEC-2997 S9S,710.00 595,710.00 98.842721 369S93AP8 01/23/1998 10-DEC-1997 S95,710.00 0.00 98.842721 FC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6.700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 -6,688,781.21 -6,688,781.21 99.83255S Page 12 -_- OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 6,688,781.22 6.688,781.22 99.832555 SC MORGAN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME ----------- 0.01 0.01 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6.700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 -5,942.54 -5,942.54 99.832555 93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 99.832555 ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 -6,694,723.75 -6,694,723.75 99.832555 93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 -6,694,723.75 0.00 99.832555 FCC MORGAN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 6,688.781.22 6,688,781.22 99.832555 93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 -6,688,781.22 -6,688,781.22 99.832555 S MORGAN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 5.942.53 5,942.53 99.832555 93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 99.832555 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6.700.000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-Nov-1997 6,694,723.75 6,694,723.75 99.832555 93114AZI6 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 6,694,723.75 0.00 99.832555 FC MORGAN 3 P SECS - FIXED INCOME 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 19-DEC-1997 17,000,000.00 17,000,000.00 100.000000 99345G530 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 19-DEC-1997 -17,000.000.00 -17,000,000.00 100.000000 S GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 19-DEC-1997 2,691.67 2,691.67 100.000000 9934SG530 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 19-DEC-1997 17,002,691.67 17,002,691.67 100.000000 99345GS30 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 19-DEC-1997 17,002,691.67 0.00 100.000000 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 13 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,100 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-DEC-1997 17,100,000.00 17 100,000.00 100.000000 99A45HO82 05.560% 12/22/1997 DO 12/19/97 22-DEC-1997 -17,100,000.00 -17:100,000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,100 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-DEC-1997 7,923.00 7,923.00 100.000000 9954SH082 05.560% 12/22/1997 DD 12/19/97 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,100 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-DEC-1997 17,107,923 00 17,107,923.00 100.000000 99145HO82 05.560% 12/22/1997 DO 12/19/97 22-DEC-1997 17,107,923:00 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC. NY 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,300 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-DEC-1997 17,300,00000 17 300,000.00 100.000000 99145H959 05.610% 12/23/1997 DO 12/22/97 23-DEC-1997 -17,300,000:00 -17:300,000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-DEC-1997 2,695.92 2,695.92 100.000000 9934SH959 05.610% 12/23/1997 DO 12/22/97 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,300 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-DEC-1997 17,302,695.92 17,302,695.92 100.000000 9914SH959 05.610% 12/23/1997 DO 12/22/97 23-DEC-1997 17,302,695.92 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NV 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,800 000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 26-DEC-1997 16,800,000 00 16,800,000.00 100.000000 9914SKO44 05.550% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 26-DEC-1997 -16,800,000:00 -16,800,000.00 100.000000 S GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NV ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,800 000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 26-DEC-1997 7,770.00 7,770.00 100,000000 99145KO44 05.550% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -16,800,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 26-DEC-1997 16,807,770.00 16,807,770.00 100.000000 Page 14 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ 9934SK044 OS.SSO% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 26-DEC-1997 16,807,770.00 0.00 100.000000 PC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-DEC-1997 91100,000.00 9,100,000.00 100.000000 99345L604 05.460% 12/29/1997 00 12/26/97 29-DEC-1997 -9,100,000.00 -9,100,000.00 100.000000 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-DEC-1997 4,140.50 4.140.50 100.000000 99345L604 05.460% 12/29/1997 DO 12/26/97 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-DEC-1997 9,104,140.50 9,104,140.50 100.000000 9934SL604 05.460% 12/29/1997 DO 12/26/97 29-DEC-1997 9,104,140.50 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -596,047.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-DEC-1997 596,047.00 596,047.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 02-DEC-1997 -S96,047.00 -596,047.00 1.000000 s 02-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -598,061.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 03-DEC-1997 598,061.00 598,061.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC iI 03-DEC-1997 -598,061.00 -598,061.00 1.000000 S 03-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -289,233.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- OS-DEC-1997 289 23300 289,233.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II OS-DEC-1997 -289:233:00 -289,233.00 1.000000 S 05-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 09-DEC-1997 3.00 3.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 09-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S 09-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -132,747.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 10-DEC-1997 132,747.00 132 747.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 10-DEC-1997 -132,747:00 -132:747.00 1.000000 S 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 02-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 18-DEC-1997 3.00 3.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 18-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S 18-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -97 311.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 19-DEC-1997 97,311 00 97 311.00 1.000000 994495906 PUBLIC II 19-DEC-1997 -97,311:00 -97:311.00 1.000000 S 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -57 597.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 23-DEC-1997 57,597.00 57,597.00 1.000000 994495906 PUBLIC II 23-DEC-1997 -57,597.00 -57,597.00 1.000000 S 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -401,476.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 24-DEC-1997 401 476.00 401,476.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 24-DEC-1997 -401:476.00 -401,476.00 1.000000 S 24-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -65,978.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 29-DEC-1997 65,97800 65,979.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 29-DEC-1997 -65,978:00 -65,978.00 1.000000 S 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -107 806.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 31-DEC-1997 107,806.00 107,806.00 1.000000 994495906 PUBLIC II 31-DEC-1997 -107,806.00 -107,806.00 1.000000 S 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 05-DEC-1997 1,266 843 75 1,266,843.7S 105.570312 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 08-DEC-1997 -1,270:166:30 -1,270,166.30 105.570312 S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- -3,322.55 -3,322.SS 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES OS-DEC-1997 5,718.23 5,718.23 105.570312 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 10S.570312 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 16 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IMV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 05-DEC-1997 1 272 561.98 1,272,S61.98 105.S70312 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 08-DEC-1997 1:272:561.98 0.00 205.570312 PC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-1997 3,700 125.00 3,700,125.00 102.781250 9128272w1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 17-DEC-1997 -3,654:703.12 -3,654,703.12 102.781250 S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NV ----------- 45,421.88 45,421.88 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-1997 10,928.S7 10,928.57 102.7812SO 9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 17-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 102.781250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,600 000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-1997 3,711 053.S7 3,711,053.57 102.7812SO 91f8272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 17-DEC-1997 3,711:053.57 0.00 102.781250 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 17-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 35,821,334.35 3S,821,334.35 100.585800 91f8273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/1S/97 01-DEC-1997 35,821,334.35 0.00 100.585800 PC HONG KONG & SHANGHAi BKG CORP. 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-DEC-1997 20 293,750.00 20,293,750.00 101.468750 999ABT030 7.000% 12/15/2027 22-DEC-1997 -20:250,000.00 -20,250,000.00 101.468750 S FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 43,750.00 43,750.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-DEC-1997 20,293,750.00 20,293,750.00 101.4687SO 999ABT030 7.000% 12/15/2027 22-DEC-1997 20,293,7SO.00 0.00 101.468750 PC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 20-NOV-1997 9,980,468.75 9,980,468.75 99.804688 994ABT113 6.080% 12/25/2027 23-DEC-1997 9,980,468.75 0.00 99.804688 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 2,758 714.92 2,758,714.92 100.316906 999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 -2,753:437.50 -2,753 437.SO 100.316906 S GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 5,277.42 5:277.42 1.000000000 Page 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750 000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 2,7S8,714 92 2,7S8,714.92 100.316906 996434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 2,758,714:92 0.00 100.316906 FC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 11-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 -2,758 714.92 -2,758,714.92 100.316906 999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 2,753:437.50 2,753,437.SO 100.316906 SC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- -5,277.42 -S,277.42 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 -2,758,714.92 -2,758,714.92 100.316906 999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 -2,7S8,714.92 0.00 100.316906 FCC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 11-DEC-2997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750 000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 2,758,701.17 2,758,701.17 100.316406 994434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 -2,753,437.50 -2,753,437.50 100.316406 S GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 5,263.67 S,263.67 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 2,758 701.17 2,7S8,701.17 100.316406 999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 2,758:701.17 0.00 100.316406 FC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -258,608.11 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-DEC-1997 258,608.11 258,608.11 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1997 -258,072.71 -258,072.71 100.000000 PD ----------- 535.40 535.40 1.000000ODO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -258,608.11 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-6 CL A 15-DEC-1997 2S8,608 11 258,608.11 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1997 258,608:11 0.00 100.000000 FC IS-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -82,691.60 GNMA iI POOL #0080023 01-DEC-1997 82,691.60 82,691.60 100.000000 36225CAz9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-DEC-1997 -84,061.18 -84,061.18 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,369.58 -1,369.S8 1.000000000 0.00 Page 18 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -82,691.60 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-DEC-1997 82,69160 82,691.60 100.000000 36225CAz9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-DEC-1997 82,691:60 0.00 100.000000 FC 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -64 451.67 GNMA II POOL #080088M 01-DEC-1997 64,451.67 64,451.67 100.000000 36f25cc20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-DEC-1997 -65,861:55 -6S,861.S5 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,409.88 -1,409.88 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -64,451.67 GNMA II POOL #080088M 01-DEC-1997 64,451.67 64,451.67 100.000000 36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-DEC-1997 64,451.67 0.00 100.000000 FC 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700 000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC OS-DEC-1997 697,746.00 697,746.00 100.000000 07iI53ZS0 12/05/1997 05-DEC-1997 -697,746.00 -697,746.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY OS-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800 000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NTS 29-DEC-1997 788,755.78 788,755.78 100.000000 M397RC7 MAT 12/29/1997 29-DEC-1997 -788,755.78 -788,755.78 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 19-DEC-1997 98,464.33 98,464.33 100.000000 3bS89QS5 MAT 12/19/1997 19-DEC-1997 -98,464.33 -98,464.33 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 PROCTER & GAMBLE DISC 08-DEC-1997 297,88400 297 884.00 100.000000 74271Rz83 12/08/1997 08-DEC-1997 -297,884:00 -297:884.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700 000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 05-DEC-1997 2,254.00 2,2S4.00 0.000000 07A157z50 12/05/1997 05-DEC-1997 2,254.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 05-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 15 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 258,608.11 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-DEC-1997 23,010.65 23,030.6S 0.000000 161614AE2 S.900% 11/15/2001 DO ll/15/95 15-DEC-1997 23,010.65 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-DEC-2997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NTS 29-DEC-1997 11,244.22 11,244.22 0.000000 313397RC7 MAT 12/29/1997 29-DEC-1997 11,244.22 0.00 0.000000 IT 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 19-DEC-1997 1,535.67 1,535.67 0.000000 313589QS5 MAT 12/19/1997 19-DEC-1997 1,535.67 0.00 0.000000 IT 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR 0 00177 30-DEC-1997 100,189.75 100,189.75 0.000000 345402H73 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 30-DEC-1997 100,189.75 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 82,691.60 GNMA II POOL #0080023 22-DEC-1997 24,738.86 24,738.86 0.000000 36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-DEC-1997 24,738.86 0.00 0.000000 IT 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 64 451.67 GNMA II POOL #080088M 22-DEC-1997 34,444.21 34,444.21 0.000000 W25CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-DEc-1997 34,444.21 0.00 0.000000 IT 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 300,ODO.00 PROCTER & GAMBLE DISC 08-DEC-1997 2,116.00 2,116.00 0.000000 74271RZ83 12/08/1997 08-DEC-1997 2,116.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 28,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-DEC-1997 900,054.62 900,054.62 0.000000 9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 30-NOV-1997 900,054.62 0.00 O.OG0000 IT 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 20 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST - CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -17,290.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-NOV-1997 -17,290.00 -17,290.00 0.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/IS/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-JUL-1997 -17,290.00 0.00 0.000000 ITC 28-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-NOV-1997 17,290.00 17,290.00 0.000000 9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 28-NOV-1997 17,290.00 0.00 0.000000 CD RECEIVED INTEREST 28-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 NOVEMBER 1997 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,S00.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1997 17,500.00 17,500.00 0.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/IS/2002 00 07/14/97 15-JUL-1997 17,S00.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 SHORT TERM FOS INT ADJ 31-DEC-1997 -7,944.91 -7,944.91 0.000000 99000OP34 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 31-DEC-1997 -7,944.91 0.00 0.000000 CW AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 01-DEC-1997 205.77 205.77 0.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 01-DEC-1997 205.77 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-DEC-1997 417.50 417.50 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-DEC-1997 417.50 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-DEC-1997 6,544.96 6,544.96 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-DEC-1997 6,544.96 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 21 Meetlng Date To JC 1% FAHR COMMITTEE 1128198 �t 1rzt�syi�9sb� i AGENDA REPORT 1twilumber /S ?A)r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 'F FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Consideration of the following actions relative to the proposed adoption of Emergency Ordinance No. 135, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, providing for an early retirement Incentive Program by granting additional service credit to eligible Districts' employees as authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04 (FAHR95-24): a) Verbal report of General Counsel. b) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the program and authorizing Districts to enact an Emergency Ordinance implementing the program. c) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 135 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). d) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 135. e) Consideration of motion to adopt Ordinance No. 135. SUMMARY The Boards have approved all Early Retirement Incentive Programs for each of the last three fiscal years. During those three years, 26 employees have retired early. Three of those positions were refilled. From the positions that were deleted the Districts saved or will save $4.4 million through fiscal year 1999. Savings were projected through 1999 because it is the first year we realize the full savings of the 1997 early retirements. Staff believes that it would again be prudent to offer this program because of the significant savings and accelerated attrition that has been demonstrated. Staff has inventoried the positions where the incumbent employee is eligible to participate in this program. We have concluded that, due to changes of organization and the method of providing services, no impairment to Districts' operations would result from the approval and implementation of this program. At least six employees have expressed strong interest in early retirement. If this program is adopted, eligible employees with a minimum of ten years of service and 50 years of age would be granted two additional years of service credit for retirement purposes, provided they retire from employment between February 1, 1998 and March 30, 1998. WeeQb WfttgI MWWQ fl Rer 7AXRI aryRel.rem tl"O dM Rmse IW1797 Page 1 Another reason for offering early retirement to employees at this time is a recent ruling in the case of Ventura County Deputy Sheriff's Association vs. Board of Retirement of the Ventura County Employees' Retirement Association. The attached memorandum from Mike Peterman to all affected employees, and agenda item number three regarding deferred compensation explains how employees can avoid a potential loss of 1 —6 percent in their retirement benefit if they retire prior to February 10, 1998. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ATTACHMENTS Ordinance 135 Spreadsheet"Early Retirement Analysis" Early Retirement Memorandum \WaWalelNl�Mpntla dBN R"pv15FANRFByR[uMMIf 93B Occ Rpwp. w+ 9 Page 2 R ORDINANCE NO. 135 PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICT EMPLOYEES WHO RETIRE EARLY AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICT EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California have previously adopted Resolutions and Ordinances approving early retirement incentive programs for all eligible District employees as authorized by Government Code Section 31641.04; and WHEREAS, previously adopted incentive programs were, as provided by law, for a fixed period of time, each of which has now expired; and WHEREAS, Districts' management has reported to the Boards the desirability of implementing a further early retirement incentive program due to the implementation of changes in the manner of performing Districts services and the savings of money and other economic benefits that will flow to the Districts by the retirement of eligible employees; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement by and among County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 209 4w 374241 13 and 14, District No. 1 is the appointed authorized agent to act for every other District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 61 7, 11, 13 and 14 have determined that changes in the manner of performing District services and the total cost savings of having higher compensated employees retire early will exceed the total actuarial costs of the additional service credit granted to those who retire under this program. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Government Code Section 31641.04 as a component provision of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 is hereby adopted and deemed applicable to all regular full time employees by the Board of Directors upon the adoption of this Ordinance. Section 2: All regular full time employees of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Califomia who are eligible to participate as members and retire under the Orange County Employees Retirement System, shall be granted two (2) additional years of service credit for retirement benefit purposes, provided they retire from regular employment of the Districts during the period of February 1, 1998 through and including March 30, 1998. Section 3: The General Manager of the Districts, or his designee, is authorized to execute any and all contracts or other documents and to transfer all required funds to mv2.1 W 5]RS 1 the Orange County Employees Retirement System, in order to implement the authorized actions provided for herein. Section 4: The total cost savings resulting from the retirement of employees in positions which are subsequently filled at a lower level or when the position is held vacant for a period of time, shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service credit granted to those employees who retire together with the related paid leave payoff costs. Section 5: Districts shall pay to the Orange County Employees Retirement System the actuarially determined cost of this early retirement incentive program over a period not to exceed five (5) years and on such other terms and conditions as shall be set forth in a mutually agreed upon written contract between the Districts and the Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System. Section 5: This Ordinance is enacted as an urgency measure to take effect immediately in order to preserve and enhance the public welfare in that the Districts have not fully recovered from all losses suffered in the bankruptcy of the County of Orange in 1995 and the savings of money through reduced employee compensation will partially offset losses suffered and incurred directly by the Districts and whose full recovery is otherwise unknown at this time. Section 7: This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. Section g: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. 202-SW 574241 -3- PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. , 1 at a regular meeting held January 28, 1998. Patricia McGuigan Chair, Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Penny Kyle Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California 209bIN 574241 -4- ATTACHMENT 'V EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP General Manager Assistant General Manager -Administration Assistant General Manager - Operations Department Heads: A. Director of Communications B. Director of Engineering C. Director of Finance D. Director of General Services Administration E. Director of Human Resources F. Director of Information Technology G. Director of Operations and Maintenance H. Director of Technical Services MANAGEMENT Financial Manager Controller Accounting Manager Purchasing Manager Engineering Manager Construction Manager Lab Manager Source Control Manager Chief Operator Maintenance Manager Human Resources Manager Safety & Emer. Resp. Manager Senior Regulatory Specialist Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Manager Training Manager Operations Manager Information Technology Manager Plant Automation Manager mn-em 57424 1 PROFESSIONAL Senior Accountant Accountant Programmer Analyst Programmer Sr. Buyer Buyer Principal Administrative Assistant Sr. Administrative Analyst Engineer Associate Engineer III Associate Engineer II Associate Engineer I Principal Engineer Associate Principal Env. Specialist Project Specialist Principal Lab & Res. Analyst Scientist Human Resources Analyst Safety & Emer. Resp. Specialist Regulatory Specialist Contract Administrator Safety Representative Senior Financial Analyst Financial Analyst Senior Maintenance Planner Planner Computer Hardware Specialist Telecommunications Specialist SUPERVISORY Principal Accountant Technology Supervisor Supervising Buyer Warehouse Supervisor Engineering Supervisor Senior Engineer Supv. Const. Inspector 2M-S o 574241 Compliance Supervisor Lab Supervisor Chief Scientist Senior Scientist Source Control Superv. Supv. Source Ctrl. Insp. Sr. Operations Supv. Operations Supervisor Maintenance Supervisor Foreman Environmental Management Supvr. Principal Financial Analyst CONFIDENTIAL Human Resources Assistant Executive Assistant I Executive Assistant II Secretary To The Board of Directors 2"2-8W 574241 1H5/98 Early Retirement Analysis One time Date Working Monthly Annual Position OCERS Net Annual Savings Total Retired YM to 65 S8lary Salary Chanoes Expense 94-95 95-96 98-97 97-98 98-99 Savinos Pamson,G Scientist 511/95 3 5,281 63,372 Deleted 13,872 10.562 49.500 63,372 63.372 63,372 250,178 Gutierrez,T Fee Mgr 3/31M 1 5,735 68,820 Deleted 51.402 17,205 17,418 68,820 68,820 68.820 241,083 Gutierrez.A Bulkler 6/30/95 2 3,400 40.800 Deleted 35.497 - 5,303 40.800 40.800 40.800 127,703 Marsella.D Mach Field Super 3/31/95 13 5,002 60.024 Deleted 31,227 15.006 28,797 60,024 60,024 60,024 223,875 McDaniel,B Foreman 3/31/95 7 4.132 49,584 Deleted 31,768 12,396 17,816 49,584 49,584 49,584 178,964 Taisne,J Mech Field Super 4/28/95 7 5,017 60,204 Deleted 41,030 10,034 19.174 60,204 60,204 60,204 209,820 Subtotal 94-95 Program 28,567 342,804 204,796 65,203 138,008 342,8D4 342,804 342,804 1.231,623 Shepherd,B Senior Stmaskeeper 3/28196 10 3,648 43,776 Refilled 22,656 - Wynn.M HR Asst 328m6 7 3,697 44,364 Deleted 22,412 11,091 21,952 44,364 44,364 121,771 Randall,R Oper Super 1/isms 4 5,105 61,260 Deleted 45,807 28,078 15,453 61,260 61,260 166.051 Canavan,D Oper Super 1/15196 10 5,105 61,260 Deleted 38,787 28,078 22,473 61.260 61,260 173,071 Ramey,K Mice Mgr 3/28196 13 6132 73,584 Deleted 39,575 18,396 34,009 73,554 73,584 199,573 Subtotal 95-96 Program 23,687 284.244 169,237 85,642 93,887 240,468 240,468 660,465 Serraniino,S Sr.Constr Imp. 8/18/96 12 5.399 64,788 Deleted 37.685 56,690 64,798 64.788 186,266 Anderson,L Sr.Plant Operator 3127/97 6 4.231 50.777 Deleted 30,288 12.693 50,777 50,777 114,247 Marsalek,G Foreman 22J97 11 4.654 55,850 Refilled internally 33,314 23,270 55,850 55,850 134.970 MCRaney,C Sr.Constr Imp. 3131197 3 4,735 56,822 Deleted 33.894 14,205 56,822 68,822 127,849 Plechockl,H. Oper Super 22m7 6 5,337 64,047 Refilled internally 38.204 26,685 64,047 64,047 154,779 Pigmon,R. Maintenance Mgr 227/97 15 6,317 75,799 Deleted 45,214 25,268 75,799 75,799 176,866 Rood,T. Sr.Plant Operator 3/27197 6 4,489 53,865 Deleted 32,130 13.467 53,865 53.865 121,197 Rood,L. Sr.Mice Planner 3/27/97 5 5,550 66,595 Deleted 39.724 16,650 66,595 66.595 149.840 Starrett.B. Constr inspector 2097 @ 70 4,461 53,627 Deleted 31.929 13,383 53,527 53.527 120,437 Thomas,G. Lead Mechanic 1116197 2 4,108 49,297 Deleted 29,406 22.594 49.297 49,297 121,188 Thom[],W. Sr.Clerk 31311'97 Disability 2,788 33,453 Refilled 19.955 - Yamsh,K Sr.Buyer 3/13197 9 4,154 49,853 Refilled 29.737 Dawes,T Engineering Mgr 3/28197 11 7,581 90,969 Refilled internally 54,263 22,743 90,969 90,969 204.681 Hamblin,W Sr.Mice Planner 3127/97 11 5.456 65,466 Deleted 39,050 16,368 65,466 65.466 147.300 Niemeyer,D. Insb Tech II 3/28197 10 4.252 51.018 Deleted 30,432 12,756 51,018 51,018 114,792 Subtotal 96.97 Program 66,263 795,146 473.342 263,389 745,293 745,293 1,753,975 Total 1,422,194 847,375 65.203 223,650 700,080 1,328.565 1.328.565 3,646,063 Salary Benefit Savings 16,953 58,149 140,016 265,713 265,713 746,544 Total Salary&Benefit Savings 82,156 281,799 840,096 1,594,278 1,594,278 4,392.607 EadyRoUrement98 9:51 AM January 7, 1998 MEMORANDUM TO: All Employees FROM: Michael L. Peterman M1f Director of Human Resources r SUBJECT: EARLY RETIREMENT We recently received a memorandum from OCERS stating that in the recent case of Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs Association vs. Board of Retirement of the Ventura County Employees' Retirement Association, the California Supreme Court ruled that employer contributions to a deferred compensation plan are not included within the definition of"compensable eaminps." Currently, the Districts treats employer contributions as "compensable earnings." What does that mean to you? It could mean plenty. If you are participating in matching contributions to deferred compensation, the Districts' portion has been added to your base salary to calculate your OCERS retirement benefit. With the new Ventura ruling, your earnings that will be used to calculate your retirement benefit would be reduced 1 to 6 percent. Because the ruling is controversial, the OCERS Board has decided to allow employer contributions to continue as part of compensable earnings, but only up until February 10, 1998 when their Board meets, presumably to adopt this policy. Since this could have a significant impact on employees that are preparing for retirement, management plans to take the early retirement incentive to our Joint Boards this month on January 28. That would give interested employees approximately a two week window between January 28 and February 10 to take advantage of the higher compensable earnings calculation by retiring from the Districts. If you are considering retirement in the near future, please contact me at x7140 to determine how this affects your retirement benefit. It may be to your benefit to take advantage of the early retirement program. If the Districts does not contribute to deferred compensation on your behalf, the Ventura ruling regarding deferred compensation does not affect you. Pending the Boards approval of the additional two years of service credit for early retirement, all eligible employees with at least 50 years of age and 10 years of service, will be offered the incentive. H:\wp.dta\N\2520kpeteman\Benefim\EaflyRetirementdoc FAHR COMMITTEE ".----TT9E.99. 1/2uT8 IM/99 + REVISEDAGENDAREPORT County sanitation DISCI 9 of orange County, California FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND REUSE PLAN (PHASE 2), JOB NO. JA0-3: ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER AND MCKEE, INC. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-3 to provide additional planning and design services in the amount of$397,239 for a total amount not to exceed $1,085,749. 2. Extend the contract duration for an additional six months to April 1999. SUMMARY Recent developments, including revisions to the draft ocean discharge permit, have required that the Districts reconsider many of the baseline assumptions of the Strategic Plan. To date, 90 percent of the peak flow management and rate structure work (Phase 1), and about 50 percent of the treatment, disposal and reuse analysis (Phase 2) have been completed. Using new baseline assumptions will require that some of the work already completed by the Districts' Strategic Plan consultant, Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM) be revised, and that the overall Strategic Plan schedule be extended by six months. An addendum to the existing Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with CDM will be required for this additional work. In addition to revising work already completed, the proposed addendum also includes (1) additional effort required to continue public participation beyond the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) and Rate Advisory Committee (RAC) processes which are nearing completion, and (2) additional support in finalizing outstanding issues related to rate structure changes planned for July 1, 1998. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total additional fee proposed for this work is $397,239, approximately 15% of CDM's existing budget for Phases 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan. Staff believes that the above changes to the Strategic Plan budget and schedule are necessary for the project to move forward with baseline assumptions that reflect the best information available to date. Please refer to the attached Professional Services Agreement Status Report. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. . (Line item: coRF Budget dem old) ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The proposed Addendum No. 2 consists of additional work listed below. These issues have been discussed with the Ad Hoc Committee, and they have concurred with staffs analysis and the need to make the revisions to the work effort. Planning horizon of 2010 versus 2020. The original planning assumptions for treatment and disposal alternatives were to be based upon projected conditions in 2020 with a detailed annual capital improvement program through 2020. This approach has been revised to provide a detailed annual capital improvement plan through 2010 with five year block increments of improvements from 2010 through 2020. This change is being made because it will be difficult to make detailed decisions based entirely on projections for 2020. Effluent limitations, concentration and mass emission limits. On December 17, 1997 the EPA and Regional Water Quality Control Board issued draft discharge requirements for the Districts' ocean discharge permit. The draft permit was anticipated much sooner, and as a result, work that has been done will need to be revisited. The new draft permit contains several important revisions to the treatment and discharge requirements under which the Districts currently operate. These include: • Originally it was assumed that concentration limits would govern our operations in all circumstances, allowing discharge emissions to rise with future flows, consequently requiring additional secondary treatment. Under the draft permit conditions, however, our operations will be governed by an annual mass emissions limit. • The EPA is interested in promoting the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR System) and has written "reopener" provisions into the permit to consider revising permit limits once the GWR System begins operation. • The emergency discharge conditions have been revised, allowing the Districts more flexibility. The impact of these changes is that the Districts will have more flexibility in meeting permit requirements. In order to consider this flexibility in making Strategic Plan recommendations, CDM will need to revisit and revise the treatment scenario analyses, cost estimates, disposal options, and biosolids management sections of the Strategic Plan. _ Continued Public Participation through completion of Strategic Plan beyond RAC and to DrOcess. A number of issues will require continued public involvement following the RAC and PAC process, through completion of the Strategic Plan, including (1) the level of treatment, (2) the program EIR, (3) the GWR System, and (4) the rate impacts from the capital improvement plan. Staff recommends continuing the public participation process during completion of the Strategic Plan through a scaled back version of the PAC and RAC process. The newly formed public group would be referred to as PAC II, and would consist of members from the RAC and PAC. Three additional public participation workshops are proposed for PAC II. Assistance in completing outstanding rate structure issues. The recommendations of the RAC left a number of issues to be resolved prior to implementation of a new rate structure. These issues include refining the commercial categories, provision for annual payment of connection fees, criteria for applying wet weather flow costs to various users, development of criteria for tiered residential connection fees. Additional Work Items, Addendum No. 2 Planning/Permit Assumptions $299,233 Additional Public Participation (PAC 2) $ 46,969 Rate Structure Issues 51.03 Total $397,239 ALTERNATIVES None. If the additional work associated with revisiting the underlying assumptions as described above is not performed, the Districts' strategic planning will not be optimized because the underlying assumptions will not reflect actual conditions. CEQA FINDINGS The Strategic Plan includes a programmatic Environmental Impact Report which is being prepared under a separate contract, J404. ATTACHMENTS 1. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 2. Budget Information Table 3. Proposal letter from CDM dated January 20, 1998. )dh Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J40-3 Phase 1 Strategic Plan Total Project Budget: $933.000 Consultant: Camp Dresser and McKee Start Date of Project: January 22, 1997 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 1122/97 Original Phase 2 Strategic Plan —Treatment, Reuse and 673,461 673,461 PSA Disposal Plan 1/5198 1 Additional Energy Studies 15,049 688,510 Proposed 2 Revised Permit Conditions, Additional Public 397,239 1,085,749 Involvement, and Assistance with Outstanding Rate Structure Issues 11AoVA1at nr72ftee1,erej40d arCDM.Yb1odon CmtM on OVIMS 5:44 PM BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE JOB NO. JAO-3 STRATEGIC PLAN: TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND REUSE BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK (ADOPTED BY AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZED TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO CORF) DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED FUNDS DATE DATE(%) CONSULTANT $ 700.000.00 $ 686,510.00 $ 397.239.00 $ 1,083,749.00 $ 350,000.00 51% STAFF $ 233.000,00 $ 136,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 261,000.00 $ 60,000.00 44% TOTAL $ 933,000.00 $ 822,510.00 $ 522.239.00 $ 1,344,749.00 $ 410,000.00 50% H.Awpola�ngbnftdm alrtable I-40 As '. :AN.20.199B 3:20PM CML° DRESSER MC10=EE CARLSBAD NO.717 P.2/11 COMCamp Dresser&McKee I,,- . _ . . . mxlha 1825 PW0rW06lewa%SUZ330 ceOdaQCaltminamas mr�a+r Te1:7004313- 6 Fac76o48 7411 January 20,1998 Mr.David Ludwin Director of&,gm ermg County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 108"Mbs Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92727-6127 �I Subject: Strategic Plan _ .. II Addendum No,2 to ProjectJ40-3 - Dear Mr.Ludwm: We are in receipt of your letter dated January 8,1998 m which CSDOC responded to the i� requests for clarification contained in our letter of December 1,1997 regarding Strategic planning issues, We have developed an estimated budget and schedule to accommodate revisions to the scope of work as a result of your responses. As requested,we have also included budget and schedule estimates to provide additional services to cover other project topics. As we have discussed,the activities which are addressed under Addendum No,2 extend over the entire strategic planning effort,not solely to the work under Project J110.3. The activities addressed in this Addendum No.2 are summarized below: r Revisions resulting from responses to the strategic planning issues raised in your January 81 1998 letter; li ■ Development of new technical memoranda requested in your January 8,1998 letter; r Additional combined Planning Advisory Committee (PAC2)workshops; ■ Inclusion of collection system revisions raised in your December 17,1997 letter;and ■ Supplemental assistance to address issues regarding the finartdel rates and charges work In developing the scope revisions and associated budget and schedule impacts,we believe we have accurately reflected your expectations regarding the additional work and the 1 required level of effort. We have summarized our understanding of CSDOC's objectives for each task I ' I JON.20.1998 3:20PM COMP DRESSER MCJFE CARLSBAD NO.717 P.3/11 jGUM Gunp Diessa&McKee Ina Mr.David Ludwin January 20,1998 Page 2 Strategic Planning Issues 1. Planning harison of 2010 versos 2020. The target planning year will remain 2020 and will be the basis for evaluating the initial four optimized alternatives(full secondary treatment and treatment to meet ocean plan criteria,with and without participation in the GWR System). When CSDOC selects the final preferred alternative(based on effluent discharge standards and the participation in the GWR System),a detailed yearly implementation plan for the first ben years andfor five-year increuhentsihereafter mitil 2020wtll be-p"aied.- — An analysis of projected.outfall discharge frequences for 2010 flows will also be i� performed to provide CSDOC with information on how overflow frequencies would be II expected to change over time. However,cost estimates for ouW discharge options j will be based of 2020 flows- IIi The collection system will not be reevaluated for 2030 flows;the improvements to the collection system,based on 2020 flows,will be used to develop staging of b improvements needed in 2010. Based on this understanding of the work,the following additional tasks have been identified: ■ Analyze the STORM model using a 2010 base flow; ■ Calculate overflow frequencies for the disposal options in 2010;and ■ Revise the text for Volume 8,Collection System,to present and discuss this information. 1 2. Fff vent limitations,concmtration and mass emission limits. Ocean Plan discharge standards will be based on a total suspended solids(TSS)mass emission rate which will be initially capped at 20,000 metric tons per year;concentration will be allowed to"float". When the initial limit is reached,the annual M mass emissions rate will be increased to 25,000 mt/yr. When GWR projectis online,the limit wID return to 20,000 mt/yr and will be raised to 25,000 mt/yr when required. Analyses will assume that no additional secondary treatment facilities will be constructed to support delivery of suitable-quality water to the GWR System;consideration of additional secondary facilities to maintain the capped TSS mass emissions rate will be made based on the analyses. Based on this understanding of the wok the following additional tasks have been identified: J0.11.20.1998 3:21PM CAIP DRESSER MCKE:E CPRLSBCkD N0.717 P.4,11 CiDM Camp Dresser&McKee inc _ . . ! I&David Ludwin January 20,1998 i Page 3 f ■ Revise blends to reflect the emissions caps,and determine time to reach limits; ! ■ Analyze the treatment plant scenarios with and without GWR System impacts; ■ Revise facilities needs and cost estimates; ■ Revise calculations to accommodate impacts on primary effluent filtration,pure oxygen/air evaluation,odor control,disinfection and bfosolids;and -_--- ■ Revise portions-a the tufts Tor Volume 4,Joint Trea—ft att Works,Volume 6, Level of Treatment,and Volume 8,Biosolids Management. 3. CSDOC Operations and Maintenance treatment coats to support GWR System. Ij ;I Fran the response to Item 2 in CSDOCs letter,it is understood that CSDOC will not ! incur further capital costs for construction of secondary facilities to support the delivery it of suitably-treated water for the GWR System. Previously,it had been assumed that additional facilities would be constructed to provide adequate quantities of secondary j effluent to the GWR System. The assermption that CSDOC will incur all operation and maintenance costs for the secondary treatment required for the GWR System will not change;however,operation and maintenance costs will change based on the decisions outlined in Item 2, Based on this understanding of the work,the following additional tasks have been identified; ■ Rerun all GWR scenarios; ■ Revise facilities needed and cast estimates; i ■ Revise cost estimates for disposal options;and ■ Revise portions of the drafts for Volume 3,Collection System,Volume 4,Joint Treatment Works,Volume 6,Level of Treatment,and Volume B,Biosolids Management 4. CSDOC participation in GWR System capital cost sharing. i ! Presently,CSDOC will only participate in the capital funding for the first phase of the j GWR System. This commitment will not exceed$130 million(half of the estimated Phase 1 capital costs);this amount could be reduced by available grant funding. Since the level of grant funding Is presently unknown,it will not be considered in project . ralnilations. -1 irN.20.1995 3:21PM CRMP DRESSER MCKEE CRRLSBRD NO.717 P.5/11 ' CDM camp D e,,,&McKee hi, Mr.David Ludwin January 20,1998 Page 4 As discussed in Item 2,CSDOC's objective will be to construct no additional secondary treatment facilities to support the delivery of suitably-treated water for the GWR i System. If other GWR System treatment or conveyance facilities are identified by the GWR System consultant which need to be sited on CSDOC property,these costs will be identified separately but will not be used for any cost comparisons. Based on this understanding of the work,the following additional tasks have been identified: - ■ Rerun all theGWXi"&rios;_"-- ■ Revise facilities needed and cost"estimates;and II ■ Revise portions of the draft for Volume 4,Joint Treatment Works,Volume 6, it Level of Treatment,and Volume 8,Biosolids Management 5. "Plarmed"versus"emergency discharge"to the 784nch outfaif or the Santa Ana River A (SAR). Should CSDOC elect to utilize the 78'outfall and/or the Santa Ana River for excess peak wet weather flows,CSDOC will discharge all of the available secondary effluent iHess the amount being sent to the GWR System)to the 78-inch outfall or to the Santa Ana River. During these peak wet weather events,primary effluent will be sent to the 120-inch outfall. The quantity and frequency of primary effluent discharges to the 78- inch outfall or to the SAR will be detem fined. It will be assumed that no additional secondary treatment facilities will be®wtructed to handle peak wet weather flows. It will also be assumed that disinfection facilities will be needed to provide some form of disinfection for all flows discharging to the 7&inch outfall or to the SAP, The form and level of disinfection will be determined and outlined in a technical memorandum. It is assumed that no dechlorination facilities will be required. Based on this understanding of the work the following additional tasks have been identified: ■ Reevaluate facilities needs and cost estimates; ■ Revise calculations to accommodate impacts on primary effluent filtration,pure oxygen/air evaluation,odor control and biosolids; ■ Revise the cost information and rerun the decision model; ■ Revise portions of the drafts for Volume 4,Joint Treatment Works,Volume 6, Tavel of Treatment,and Volume 8,Biosolids Management and :1 3RN.20.1990 3:22PM CPMP DRESSER MCKEE CRRLSBgD N0.717 P.6i11 CDMComp D esscr&McKee Inc Mr.David Ludwin January 20,1999 Page 5 j ■ Review effluent disinfection facilities required for excess flow events,and revise cost estimates. 6. Activated sludge facifitirs loading rates and concentration baud effluent quality criteria. CSDOC's letter of January 8,1998 did not specifically address the question of assuming a more aggressive loading rate on the activated sludge facilities(with or without the — - GWR System)., Our analysis was based4ti tine-assmnptiwn that the activated sludge-- facilities at Plant No.1 would be loaded at two different rates depending on the effluent jl quality required. Operating with the GWR System a loading rate of 8 mgd/basin was assumed to maximize effluent quality;without the GWR System,the basins were j assumed to be loaded at a rate of 13 mgd/basin. CSDOC staff suggested that the higher loading rate may be suitable with the GWR System scenarios since the GWR System may not be as sensitive to higher TS$levels as previously indicated. As part of the technical memoranda discussed in Activity B later in this letter,the various activated sludge loading rates will be reviewed,and their potential impacts on the facilities planning will be assessed. 1 The second issue of assuming a more conservative concentration based effluent quality q criteria of a5 mg/1 was addressed in the January 8,1998 Letter as follows. Because the 1 selection of the individual design parameters for each treatment process have already incorporated acceptable levels of conservatism,CSDOC does not feel that a further limitation of the effluent quality is appropriate. Further,the decision of CSDOC to base effluent discharge on a TSS mass emissions limit revolves this issue. I Based on this understanding of the work no additional tasks will be required. i7. provide fidl-train"costs for each alternative. CSDOC has suggested that full-train costs should be developed for all alternatives,not simply the final preferred alternative;however,CSDOC does notwant the development of these full-train costs to delay the completion of the Planning Advisory Committee i (PAC)workshop process. The purpose of the PAC workshop cost estimates is to enable PAC members to discern the relative differences between scenarios;full-train(life-cycle)cost estimates are not necessary to achieve this objective While the major capital and associated O&M costs have already been taken into account,costs for other full-train activities,including plant-wide systems and facilities,and common costs,such as technical support and administration,have not been factored in at this stage of the evaluation These costs JPN.20.1998 a:22PM CPMP DRESSER MCKEEE CPJZ SBW NO.717 P.7/11 ' I CDM cemP�&Lmcx elna e. I .-+ w. .. .,,, . Mr.David Ludwir January 20,1998 Page 6 will be included in a final cost estimate for the selected preferred alternative,but their inclusion during the PAC workshop process,when multiple scenarios and alternatives are being evaluated,will increase project costs without providing significant improvement in alternative analyses. Based on this understanding of the work,the original approach will be maintained. However,full-tiein costs will be presented during PAC2 Workshops. B. Operate 2,__.._.—___ --. --- �I This issue was not included in our December 1,1997 letter,but it has been discussed in subsequent meetings with CSDOC.,We now understand that the existing secondary t treatment facilities at Plant No.2 should not be decommissioned or"mothballed"but should be available for service. Although not specifically stated,it is assumed that the secondary facilities at Plant No.1 should also not be taken out of service. This decision has several implications. First,a new pumping system may be needed to return a portion of the secondary flows treated at Plant No.2 to the new GWR System facilities next to Plant No.1. Second,the need to divert SARI flows from Plant No. 1 to Plant No.2 to avoid possible quality issues may be eliminated because of the introduction of such a return pumping system. t Based on this understanding of the work,the following additional tasks have been identified: ■ Analyze the treatment plant scenarios with and without GWR System impacts; ■ Review facilities needs and prepare a cost estimate;and ' ■ Review portions of Volume 4,Joint Treatment Works,and Volume 6,Level of j Treatment. Develop Technical Memoranda To assist in confirming the fundamental assumptions and"building blocks"which have ' been used to develop the strategic planning effort to date,CSDOC has requested that a ' set of memoranda be prepared to document the technical development of the project 'These memoranda will incorporate work completed,previous correspondence,and the insults of discussions and meetings with CM=staff. The specific areas for which technical memoranda will be prepared are: , JPN.20.199B 3:23PM CAMP DRESSER MO(EEE CARLSBAD NO.717 P.9/11 w CDM camp rates&McKee lots . Mr. David I,udwin " .. _, ` .• '�'n, fY. + a wN - January 20,1998 Page 7 1. Disposal Samalro6 Technical Memorandum No.1 will summarize the development of the projected dry weather and wet weather flows;the oatfall options;planning needs;and operational strategies for nee of oudall options. 2. Basic Planning Assumptions i Technical Memorandum No.2 will summarize the development of a variety of basic planning assumptions used in the Strategic Plan including collection system I performance;in-line storage;wastewater composition;toxics loadings;chemical usage;energy usage;and plant Watts usage. I3. Cost Estimates--....- li Technical Memorandum No.Swill provide the background for the development of project cost estimates including information sources;cost estimating methodology; it and present worth calnilations. IIf`` 4. Pretreatment S Technical Memorandum No.4 will summarize the assumptions used in the SSSS development of pretreatment basis of design. 5. Treahnerrllhou6ses Technical Memorandum No.5 will discuss assumptions and summarize the development of the technical bases of design for the wastewater treatment processes } including primary treatment;primary effluent filtration;secondary treatment;and air quality i 6. Solids Technical Memorandum No.6 will document major assumptions and development 1 of the bases of design for solids processing including digestion and dewatering. tI 7. Biosolids Management Technical Memorandum No.7 will summarize the development of biosolids management including assumptions;biosolids quality;transportation;and disposal/reuse. i j Additional PAC2 Workshops The RAC workshop process was completed in October 1997. The PAC process,to review the peak flow management plan,will be completed this spring. It is now believed that continued public participation,beyond the original mission of both the RAC and the PAC, will be required through the completion of the strategic planning process. A new committee will be formed(Planning Advisory Committee 2,PAC2),which combines the members of both the RAC and the PAC. The intent of this committee is to provide input and feedback for the following three steps: final development of the preferred alternative, i JAN.28.1998 3:23PM COMP DRESSER MCK=E CRRLSBiD ND.717 P.9/11 CDM Camp Dresser&McKee In, Mr.David Ludwin January 20,1998 Page 8 development of rate impacts from the final Capital Improvement Program,and review of the environmental documentation For this continued program,it is envisioned that three PAC2 workshops would be needed to review information concerning the topics outlined above. Revisions to COIIecBon System In a letter dated December 17,1997,(SDOC requested that modifications be made to the collection system model.-These modifications pertain to-the-redevelopment of the MCAS Tustin and the relocation of the Gisler Redhill Trunk Sewer. We have developed an estimated budget and schedule iP accommodate these revisions to the model per your, -. II request. II Based on this understanding of the work the following additional tasks have been identified: ■ Modify dry and wet-weather hydrographs(1998,2000,2010,2020) ■ Identify new load points ■ Incorporate new sewers ■ Analyze impact of changes to the adjacent collection systems ■ Rerun the effected Plant No.1 tributary sewer model ■ Rerun the Plant No.1 diversion and interplant models j ■ Reevaluate Main Street and College Avenue Pump Stations based on new ` configurations . ■ Revise deficiency analysis(1998,2000,2010,2020) ■ Revisit street impact issues and constriction cost estimates a Modify text and figures in Volumue 3,Collection System Supplemental Rates and Charges Services Although the majority of the work under Project J 0-2 has been completed,there are a number of unresolved issues which must be addressed In addition,CSDOC staff has requested assistance in a number of specific areas as described below: JRN.20.1998 3:24PM CRM? DRESSER MODE CPRLSBAD N0.717 P.10/11 CDM Camp Dresser&McKee lru. Mr.David Ludwin January 20,1998 Page 9 I 1. Commercial Categories This activity will further refine commercial categories,update the rate structure, determine appropriate user charges;and develop a comparison of user charges with Los Angeles CM and the City of San Diego, 2. Armval Payment of Connection Fees This activity will develop a plan to implement an annual connection fee for industry;establish qualification criteria;and modify the rate structure to include these annual connection fees II I Equufvalerrt Dwelling llydf Flow Verification This activity will investigate and resolve the discrepancy between the&DU rate currently used by CSDOC for capital projects projections and the rate which resulted from the 1-40-2 work and incorporate any Changes Into the rate structure model. 4. Wet Weather Flow Costs This activity will develop criteria to shift wet weather flow costs from commercial/ industrial users to residential users;and incorporate any changes into the rate structure model. 5. Tiered Itesidential Camtretion Firs I This activity will develop criteria for a tiered residential connection fee,and li incorporate any changes into the rate structure model. 6. Rate Stmctarc Model btstmatim Maruual This activity will update the Rate Structure Model Instruction Manual. 7. Meetings This activity will provide time to attend four two-hour meetings to complete Activities C1 through C6;and participate in two FAHR meetings. The requested changes will require the development of new hydrographs,the analysis of system impacts,and the revision of a significant number of figures and tables. A set of spreadsheets is attached which details the estimated labor hours and total costs for performing the work as described above. These costs are summarized in the following table: SW1.26.1999 3:24PM CF"P DRESSER MCIEEE CARLSBAD MO.717 P.11/11 CDM Catrp Dresser&McKee Inc. Mr.David Ludwin January 20,1998 1 I Page 10 t Summary of Estimated Casts forAddondur,No.2 CDM CDM hoof ConsumnS Subeonsultant Mod Taint ACOydy Hour, SeMeas• Coat Profit Cost Planning Issues 1,281 $154,852 $D $15.267 $170,139 Technical MamDmnde 070 $09,590 $11,200 $3.838 $109,668 III PAC2 Workshops .. .. _ _ _.543,74@ __ ___..$0_. $4,220 $46,969 --._ � Collection System 194 $17,772 $0 $1.764 $19.526 Sup9lemeotal Sale" ""' - " '19 ,<049 $47.908 $261 461JOiN Setvicee Totals 2,709 s307,751 $59,109 $90,9M 6397,2.99 Includes labor and other dlreot costs. Please review the inforawtion in this letter and contact me if you or your staff have questions. CDM looks forward to performing these important strategic planning tasks and in completing the Strategic Plan Very y ours, Pt M INC eneM.B Vi a President 001'C:dmV.I=D1RASEZMISCLTRMt 15I®DLLTR x: Jim Herberg/CSDOC Paul Gustafson/CDM Kevin Schmidt/CDM Marco Linden/CDM Heather Boyle/CDM Ed Fembadh/CDM I FAHR COMMITTEE N"°"°°° TO am. mnt/as otixarve AGENDA REPORT l mNumW Ie County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager SUBJECT: Award of Contract, Job No. 132-70, Replacement of Construction Management Trailers at Plant No. 2 (All Districts) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize award of a contract for Job No. 132-70, Replacement of Construction Management Trailers at Plant No. 2, to Space Leasing Company, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $163,989. SUMMARY On January 13, 1997, the Plant No. 2 Construction Management Trailer complex was destroyed by a structural fire. This item requests authorization for award of contract to Space Leasing Company, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for replacement of the trailers destroyed by the fire. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The proposed contract with Space Leasing Company, Inc., is in an amount not to exceed $183,989. Total project costs exceeding the self-insurance retention are eligible for reimbursement under the Districts' All-Risk Property Insurance Program. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted: CORF, Misc. Improvement Projects at Plant 2. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Kb ftftQ1�AAW MFpBUAMFANgG 7D a 1m7a7 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION On January 13, 1997, the Construction Management trailer complex, located in the east parking lot at Plant No. 2, was destroyed by a structural fire. After reviewing alternatives for replacing the lost Construction Management office space, it was decided to procure and install replacement trailers at the same site. Engineering/Small Projects staff completed design work, prepared plans and specifications, bid and contract documents. In November 1997, six (6) interested bidders received bid documents. On December 2, 1997, three (3) responsible bids were received. The bids ranged from a low of$183,989, submitted by Space Leasing Company, Inc., of Fontana, to a high of $212,477. The engineer's estimate for the project was $230,000. Contract documents have been completed with Space Leasing Company, and approved by the Districts' Purchasing Contracts Manager. The Districts' All-Risk Property Insurance broker and claims manager have been kept informed of progress on this project. Staff hereby requests authorization for award of contract to Space Leasing Company, Inc. The estimated project completion date is March 5, 1998. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1 . Bid Summary SK:lc 11.w tl ftUlftmroWAHWMRIVAWAHgp Tp R.A..a IMM Page 2 December 2, 1997 11:00 a.m. ADDENDA: 1 BID TABULATION Job No. P2-70 PROJECT TITLE: Replacement of Construction Management Trailers at Plant No. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Construction Management Trailers at Plant No. 2 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $230,000. BUDGET AMOUNT: Reimbursement by Insurance Co. _ TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID 1. SPACE LEASING $183,989.00 2. RESUN LEASING $212,477.00 3. BRANDALL MODULAR $205,000.00 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the abov"oject and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I,therefore, recommend award to Space Leasing 1Athe bid amount of $183,989.00 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin,P.E. Director of Engineering H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\P2-70\BIDTAB.DOC CSDOC • P.O.Bar 8127 •Fountain VaiNf,CA BZ728-0127 .(714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I To x.eaR. 1/28/99 I/29/96 AGENDA REPORT IRMft^ tteyrbff County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineed Prepared by: Bob Chenowith, Project Manager SUBJECT: Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1 Bid date: January 13, 1998 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve Addendum No. 1 for the Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation. 3) Authorize award of contract to Jerrold Corporation, in the total amount of $ 29,813.00. SUMMARY: The existing wood fencing along Pacific Coast Highway at Bay Bridge Pump Station, constructed in 1992 under Job No. 5-33, has deteriorated from outside elements and is in need of replacement. Access to the pump station from Pacific Coast Highway is extremely difficult for District's maintenance personnel. The proposed plan will remove the old fence and install a new masonry block wall with stucco exterior to match existing pump station color and texture. This project will enhance the property and make the pump station blend in with the surrounding buildings. There will be three painted aluminum access gates. One will be for maintenance personnel access to check the pump station and the other two will be for maintenance trucks and equipment. Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications provided technical clarifications to the plans, including the limits of removal of existing facilities. Hw geb 72Wwwm INR 01 R.,,.., ,nnnr Page 1 PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY: The Engineer's estimate for construction including Addendum No. 1 is $38,000.00. On January 13, 1998, ten bids were received for said contract. The bids ranged from a high of$62,499.00 to a low of$29,813.00, submitted by Jerrold Corporation. Staff recommends approval of this contract to Jerrold Corporation in the amount of$29,813.00 and approval of a new budget totalling $55,000.00 for this project as shown on the attached Budget Information table. A complete bid tabulation and recommendation is attached. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Item has been budgeted. ( LINE ITEM: EARTHQUAKE/FLOOD AND FIRE RESERVES ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) CEQA FINDINGS: Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989 under the Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan. ATTACHMENTS : 1. Bid Tabulation and recommendation. R M W�l�nIAiRW Rm ,a,W Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1 1997-1998 FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK APPROVED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZED TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED FUNDS DATE DATE)%) STAFF DESIGN $ 6.500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ $ 6.500.00 $ 4.800.00 74% CONSTRUCTION $ 38.000.00 NA $ 29.813.00 $ 29,813.00 $ 0% STAFF CONSTR. MGMT $ 10,500.00 $ 10.500.00 1 $ $ 10.500.00 is 1,200.00 11% TOTAL 1 $ 55,000.00 $ 17,000.00 1 $ 29,813.00 $ 46,813.00 $ 6,000.00 35°h H\wp. Wbng�ng&33-1agcndaW Mls January 13, 1998 11:00 a.m. / ADDENDA: BID TABULATION Contract No. 5-33-1 PROJECT TITLE: Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 5.33.1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $38.000 BUDGET AMOUNT:$ TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID 1. JERROLD CORPORATION $29,813.00 2. SOUTHLAND CONSTRUCTION $30,000.00 3. VERNE'S PLUMBING $36,700.00 4. LLOYD ENGINEERING $37,885.00 5. UNITED BUILDERS $40,625.00 6. ATLAS-ALLIED $41,580.00 7, WAKEHAM-BAKER $45,045.00 8. ULTIMO CONSTRUCTION $58,421.00 9. LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING $61,800.00 10. AUSTIN COURT $62,499.77 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to JERROLD CO TION in the bid amount of $29,813.00 as the lowest and best bid. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering N:1W P.DTAIENG%ENG75-33.11BIDTAB.M CSDOC 40 P.O.Box 0127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 1/13/98 BID TABULATION BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1 JERROLD CORPORATION SOUTHLAND CONSTRUCTION VERNE'S PLUMBING Item Approx. Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 Lump Sum L.S. $ 500.00 L.S. $ 5.000.00 L.S. $ 500.00 2 Lump Sum L.S. $ 29,313.00 L.S. $ 25.000.00 L.S. $ 36,200.00 Subtotal $„29,81300' .S r30,000'.00 'Add (+) or Delete (-) $ - $ - Total Amount of Bid $'29,813.00 $130,000,00 E. .. ,700.00- JERROLD CORPORATION SOUTHLAND CONSTRUCTION VERNE'S PLUMBING LLOYD ENGINEERING UNITED BUILDERS ATLAS-ALLIED Item Approx. Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 Lump Sum L.S. $ 455.00 L.S. $ 1,750.00 L.S. $ 2,000.00 2 Lump Sum L.S. $ 37,430.00 L.S. $ 38,875.00 L.S. $ 39,580.00 Subtotal :$47 885,60 $1,,40;825bl) .$ 4j 580.00: 'Add (+) or Delete (-) $ - $ - Total Amount of Bid $z37,685.00 $ 40,625.00 LLOYD ENGINEERING UNITED BUILDERS ATLAS-ALLIED H:Wp.dla)en&ngLS lBldab As 1/13/98 BID TABULATION BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1 WAKEHAM-BAKER ULTIMO CONSTRUCTION LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING Item Approx. Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 Lump Sum L.S. E 5.00 L.S. E 1,200.00 L.S. E 3,400.00 2 Lump Sum L.S. E 45.040.00 L.S. E 57,221.00 L.S. E 58.400.00 Subtotal sA.4 045.00 '$16,'421b0 S' .. 81';800.00; 'Add (+) or Delete(-) E - E - E - Total Amount of Bid E''45;045.00- $'58;421:00; $" 81:I F*ixt. WAKEHAM-BAKER ULTIMOCONSTRUCTION LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING AUSTIN COURT Item Approx. Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 Lump Sum L.S. E - L.S. L.S. 2 Lump Sum L.S. E 62,499.77 L.S. L.S. Subtotal E'82,499,77. 'Add (+) or Delete (-) E - Total Amount of Bid E'82,499,774 AUSTIN COURT E - E - KWI,dlabn&ngLS33-1 Bldlab ds y Board or Directors �f�,GNfAtli ,�- j 7,4 GJemes V. Evanrson Joy L Neugebauer Russell C. Paris Margie L Rice January 21, 1998 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA Attn: FAHR Committee Re: Proposed Inter-District Borrowing and Lending Program Gentlemen: The Board of Directors of the Midway City Sanitary District opposes the proposed plan to make short-term loans available to District Nos. 1 and 11 from District Nos. 2 and 3 funds. Our District representative has been directed to vote against any borrowing and lending program to provide inter-District loans. Sincerel /01 Russell C. Paris President 14451 Cedarwood Avenue • Westminster, California 92683 • (714)893-3553 • Fax(714) 891-8624 JAN-21-90 WED 10:57 AM U"BRN 1A111 INST 1714760607E P.01 `�.� �d��f`i�weawe�armx6a6abNw FAX COVER SHEET URBAN WATER INSTITUTE, INC. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 (714) 760-6071 ➢x (724) 760-6013 DATE: January 19, 1998 FROM: URBAN WATER INSTITUTE WORKSHOP/Workshop DEPARTMENT TO: Penny Kyle Clerk of the Board. SUBJECT: UP-COMING WORKSHOP/Workshop NOTIFICATIONS "Technology 6 Exotic Water Resources" NO# SHEETS FAX# 714-962-0356 PHONE 714-962-2411 RRNARKSI Dear Penny, Please add the Urban Water Institute's Workshop invitation to your agenda for the next Board of Directors meeting. As members or potential members of the Urban Water Institute, the workshop Works as a vital and informative tool essential to your board on current information on water issues facing our entire state an well as the Southwestern United States. As members of the Institute all board members and staff are entitled to registration discounts. If interested in information about membership or the workshop, please call the Urban Water Institute at the number at the top of this page. Thank you for your consideration JAN-21-99 WED 10:50 AM URBAN WATER INST 17147606073 P. 02 URBAN WATER INSTITUTE WORKSHOP & EXHIBIT "NEW TECHNOLOGY AND EXOTIC WATER RESOURCES" A Non-technical Workshop for the Water and Wastewater industries NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE CO-SPONSORS February 26, 1998 Sheraton Industry Hills Resort - City of Industry 7:30 a.m. Registration - Continental Breakfast Exhibits open 8:30 a-m. Keynote - The Value of water Ronald Linaky, Executive Director National Water Research Institute How much can we afford to upend on new technology for the treatment and recovery of water/wastewater, brackish water or seawater? First, we need to know the value of water. 9:00 a.m. A Consultants' "Braintrust" Discussion. Moderator - Robert Siemak, Vice President Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. David Harrison, Vice President Montgomery Watson, Inc. Paul Brown, Senior Vice President Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. Kevin Hunt, Corporate Director Psomau & Associates Bruce Mowry, Phd. , Senior Project Manager CH2M Hill What are the emerging issues facing the water and wastewater industries in the 21st Century? What is the need for new technology? Are the water and wastewater industries all one industry now? Are we organized to meet the future challenges? 10:00 a.m. Break - Visit Exhibits 10:30 a.m. What Are Public Agencies Doing to Most Challenges of The Next Century? Ed Means, Assistant General Manager, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Paul Jones, General Manager Central and West Basin Municipal Water Districts William R. Mills, General Manager Orange County Water District Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager, Operations Sanitation Districts of Orange County JAN-21-98 WED 1e :se AM URBAN WATER INST 17147606073 P_ 03 How Can the separate imported water, wastewater and groundwater agencies begin to work together to take advantage of new technologies? Can water and wastewater agencies move forward without the help of private industry? what is the role of private industry? 11:30 a.m. What is Happening at the Federal Level? Stan Ponce PhD, Director of Research U.S Bureau of Reclamation How is the federal government contributing to new technology needs on the one hand while EPA and other agencies make more stringent requirements for Safe Drinking Water? 12:00 noon Lunch Break 12:30 p.m. Luncheon Speaker David White, M.D. , Professor of Microbiology, University of Tennessee The human immune system and the future of water. 1:00 p.m. Dessert break - Visit Exhibits 1:30 p.m. What Help Are We Getting From Private Industry? Moderator - Ron Lipsky, Executive Director National Water Research Institute David Furukawa, Separation Consultants, Inc. Innovative New Reverse Osmosis Process Lloyd Luthringer, Carefree Water Products, Inc. In-pipe Water Softening for Municipal Systems (name to come) Calmon Inc. , Killing Pathogens With Soundwaves Southern California Edison Co. Electronic Approaches to Water Treatment 2:30 p.m. The Future of Techology George Tehobanoglous, Professor, UC Davis Author of "New Technologies in Wastewater Treatment" 3:00 pm. Adjourn to Reception - View Exhibits