HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-01-28 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
January 22, 1998
NOTICE OF MEETING
(71419622411 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
melling add,..; NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
Fcunual.Valley.
CA
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
927288127
avast eaeran:
10844 Ell ie Avenue WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1998 - 7:30 P.M.
Fountain Valley,CA
927087018
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Member
Agenda. The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
• Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will
CIGea be held at the above location, time and date.
Anaheim
Brea
Bucne Park
rypre66
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Huntington Beach B d e tary
Irvine
Le Habra
Le Palma
Laba
Newportrt Beach
e Beech Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings
ch
Orange
Placenta
Same
Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday. January 28, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
7uetin
One Perk
Yarba Linda STRATEGIC PLAN REVIEW - Wednesday, January 28. 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
County of orange NEW BOARD MEMBER ORIEINTATION - Saturday,January 31, 1998 at 9:00 a.m.
9anlbry D16tricto OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
Centel Mesa TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 4, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
Barden Breve
Midway City PLANNING, DESIGN AND
Water olatricte CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE - Thursday, February 5, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
Irvine Bench FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 11, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 25, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
A Public Wastewater and Erwronmentel Management Agency Camm2ted to Protecting the Environment an. 1954
JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Joint Board Meeting
February February 25, 1998
March March 25, 1998
April April 22, 1998
May May 27, 1998
June June 24, 1998
July July 22, 1998
August August 26, 1998
September September 23, 1998
October October 28, 1998
November November 18, 1998
December December 16, 1998
January January 27, 1999
February February 24, 1999
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 28, 1998-7:30 P.M.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
Minute excerpts have been received asset forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is
appropriate to receive and file said excerpts:
3. a. DISTRICTS 2, 3. 11 & 13
Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re election
of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor)
City/Agency District Active Director Alternate Director
Brea 2, 3 & 13 Burnie Dunlap Glenn G. Parker
Fountain Valley 2 &3 John Collins Laurann Cook'
Fullerton 2 &3 Don Bankhead' Jan Flory
Huntington Beach 3 Shirley Dettloff* Tom Harman
3 &11 Dave Sullivan Tom Hannan
Los Alamitos 3 Charles E. Sylvia Ronald Bates'
Midway City
Sanitary District 3 Margie L. Rice James V. Evans
Placentia 2 Norman Z. Eckenrode' Constance Underhill
Villa Park 2 Barry Denes Richard A. Freschi'
Yorba Linda 2 & 13 John M. Gullixson Gene Wisner'
ov28/98
Page 2 of 2
3. b. DISTRICTS 2 & 3
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Dorothy Rush of
the City of La Habra from the Boards of Directors of District Nos. 2 and 3, and seating first
and second alternates to the mayor, as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
2 &3 Steve Anderson John Holmberg
C. DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Gerald Sigler of
the City of Buena Park from the Board of Directors of District No. 3, and seating first and
second alternates to the mayor, as follows:
Active Director Alternate Director
Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller
d. DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor David J. Shawver
of the City of Stanton from the Board of Directors of District No. 3, and seating first and
second alternates to the mayor, as follows:
Active Director Alternate Director
Brian Donahue Harty M. Dotson
e. Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to
preparation of supplemental agenda, if any
4. a. DISTRICT 13— Election of Chair pro tem
b. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
K: pall genda\1998 Jo 8mrd Agen mO12898wppagenda.d=
AGENDA
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 28, 1998-7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has
been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion
j and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item, or that there
is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the
posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to
the meeting date.
1. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to
appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary
5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters
of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be
deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot
have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b).
01/28198
Page 2 of 6
6. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous
matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no
action by the Directors.
a. Report of Joint Chair: consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and
awards
b. Report of General Manager
C. Report of General Counsel
7. EACH DISTRICT
If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as
mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.
District 1 December 17, 1997
District 2 December 17, 1997
District 3 December 17, 1997
District 5 December 17 1997
District 6 December 17, 1997
District 7 December 17, 1997
District 11 December 17, 1997
District 13 December 17, 1997
District 14 December 17, 1997
8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each
Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District
represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.)
ALL DISTRICTS 11/12/97 11/26/97
Joint Operating Fund $1,285,072.00 $2,608,196.69
Capital Outlay Revolving fund 147,119.96 3,185,772.58
Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 26,043.09
District No. 1 0.00 0.00
District No. 2 6,311.14 1,625.63
District No. 3 0.00 8,715.00
District No. 5 0.00 0.00
District No. 6 0.00 3,445.43
District No. 7 6,162.22 35.00
District No. 11 0.00 41,374.16
District No. 13 0.00 0.00
District No. 14 0.00 0.00
TOTALS $1 444,665 32 $5 875 208 58
01/28/98
Page 3 of 6
CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEM NOS. 9 - 11)
All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a
Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All Items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions,
and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed
from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition
by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the
Consent Calendar.
The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.
Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
9. Adopt State Office of Emergency Services Resolution for the purpose of obtaining federal and/or
state financial assistance in connection with winter storm of December 6, 1997.
10. Reaffirm the Districts' prior commitment to maintain all the terms and conditions of all the current
agreements among County Sanitation District 14, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County and the Irvine Ranch Water District; and authorize the Joint Chairman to transmit a letter
regarding the CSDOC consolidation commitment to the Irvine Ranch Water District.
DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3 & 11
11. a. Approve Inter-Dishict Loan Agreement for Capital Facilities between District Nos. 1 and
2 in the amount of$6,300,000.00; and
b. Approve Inter-District Loan Agreement for Capital Facilities between District Nos. 3 and
11 in the amount of$4,000,000.00.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
12. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
01/28/98
Page 4 of 6
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re January 28, 1998 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee
Minutes for the meeting held on December 17, 1997 to be filed.
C. Approve name change from the "County Sanitation Districts of Orange County"to the
"Orange County Sanitation District"to coincide with the July 1, 1998 consolidation date.
14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan re December 18,
1997 meeting.
b. AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the draft Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan
Minutes for the meeting held on December 18, 1997 to be filed.
15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee re January 21, 1998 meeting.
b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft
Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held
on January 21, 1998 to be filed.
C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of December 1997.
d. ITEM DELETED
e. Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 135, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, Providing for an Early Retirement Incentive Program by Granting Additional
Service Credit to Eligible Districts' Employees as Authorized by the County Employees'
Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04,
1. Verbal report of General Counsel
2. Motion to read Ordinance No. 135 by title only and waive reading of said entire
ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by
unanimous vote of Directors present).
3. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. 135.
4. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 135
01/28/98
Page 5 of 6
ALL DISTRICTS— (Continued from page 4)
15. f. ITEM DELETED
g. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser&
McKee, Inc., for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-3, to provide
additional planning and design services in the amount of$397,239, for a total amount not
to exceed$1.085,749; and, extend the contract duration for an additional six months to
April 1999.
h. Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, approve Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications, and authorize award of a contract for Replacement of
Construction Management Trailers at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-70, to Space Leasing
Company, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $183,989.
DISTRICT 5
16. Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications, and authorize award of a contract for Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-33-1, to Jerrold Corporation in the total amount of$29,813.00.
17. ALL DISTRICTS
CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chair may convene the Boards in
dosed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or
potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Govemment Code Sections
54956,8, 54956.9. 54957 or 54957.6, as noted,
Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or
potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee
representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public
Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted dosed session and
are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Boards take final actions on
any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
01/28/98
Page 6 of 6
ALL DISTRICTS— (Continued from page 5)
17. a. 1. Confer with General Counsel re consideration of initiation of possible litigation,
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v. PennWilson CNG (Government
Code Section 54956.9(c)).
2. Confer with General Counsel re Frank Chavez v. County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, Workers Compensation Appeals Board Case No. LB00283418
(Government Code Section 54956.9[a)).
b. Reconvene in regular session
c. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
18. Matters that a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
19. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report
20. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
21. Adjournments
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards,
Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the dose of business 14 days '..
preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items
submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications.
Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 or
(714)962-2411, ext. 7130 '..
H 1wp dta\admin\9SWgenda\912898.doc
MEE IND DATE: 01/28/98 TIME: 7:30 p.m. DNiTRICTS: 1, 2, 3, 5,8. 7. 11, 13& 14
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
ILUT21 ...................... ....MC OUIDAN ...J/ IHOLMUR01.. ... ...... .ANDERSON................... ✓ —
IPERRYI...... .._FERRYMAN .. . ._. / 1 )......... ...........SANKHEAD................... _
(COONT21... .....MURMY ._. OEYES)...........................BROADWATER.............. _
IMTTSI.......... ....SALTARELLI.................. DOMYTIEI.....................BROVM...................... _
ISTEINERL...._.................5%TZER....................... ICOOKL...........................IbLLMS....................... —
WOYESI..........................DEBAY.........................
—
DISTRICT 2 (MSCHO........................DEMSS..........................
IMMMILLI....................EMENRODE.................. IHARMAN).......................DETTLOFF..................... —
(COON17)........................MURMY....................... IDOTSONI........................DONAHM................ —
IHOLMBERO)--...............ANDERsoN................... IPARKERI.........................DUNUP....................... —
1 I...........................BANSHEAO.................,. (UNDERHILL)....................ECKENRODE..................
(LEYES)...........................BROADWAT:fl.............. IPERRYI...........................FEMYMAN...................�
(COON............................COLLMB....................... Iw NER1.........................OULLOSON.................. _
IRIESLNO........................MES......................... JCAAROLU.......................JOKES.......................... —
(PARKER).........................DUNIAP....................... (BROADWATER)...............LEYES............
mIBNER).........................SULttlIBON.................. IMAULLER)......................WROMM................... —
ILUTM.............................MCOUISAN................... ILUTZI.............................AICOUMAN.................. —
ISTEINERI........................ST2ER....................... (WALKER)........................MINOR BRADFORD......... —
IDALn............................SEMEL.......................... ICOONTZI........................NILOUW...............
........ —
WESAn..........................NOYES......................... _
DISTRICTS IEVANSI..........................RICE............................. ✓ —
IEVANSI..........................RICE............................ (MMI...........................SALTARELLI..................7
IWAMERI........................MMEIIBMDFORD......... IHAMMONDI..................MIW�....................... —
IHOLMBER01....................ANDERBON................... SUMER).........................BPIIZFR....................... _
1 I............................BANKHEAD................... (SP ERI........................STEMEA........................JG — —
(FORSYTHE).-..................BROW N........................ IHARIMNI.......................SULLIVAN.....................JG
ICOOK)..............I.............COLLINS....................... IMILLERI..........................SWAN.......................... —
IDOTSONI........................DONAHUE..................... IBATESI...........................SYLVIA................... _
IPAAKER)..................4......DUNUP....................... IDALYI............................ZEMEL......................
.... —
(CARROLU.......................JONES..........................
—
IBIIOADWATEPo...............LEYEe.......................... STAFF
iMAIXL Q......................MARSNALL................... —
wm)-........................... MCOUIOAN................... L/'�Z I' u/(STEMDN........................BPR2ER....................... ANDERSON...................... Ol�'�M
MARNULNI.......................WLLNAN..................... DAHL.............................. O
(BATES)...........................SYLVN......................
..y NODOE6..........................SIC - /V/r�
(DALY)............................2E1WEL..........................� — KYLE............................... /�1M
LUDWM..........................
DISTRICTSMCINTYRE....................... �7�W
INOYESI..........................DEBAY......................... ✓ OOTEN........
....................
1S B Rj NUMBS.........................
sTREEO.....::::::::::::: :::::::
15PD2ER1........................BIEMER.......................�
DISTRICT S WHEATLEY......................
(PERRY)...........................FERRYIMN..................�I .............I........................
— ywnn�
IsPRZFAI........................Sn.ER...................... ......................................— y p
MOYEs)..........................DEMY.........................— ......................................-
- - ..............................- pp. .T
DISTRICT 7
IMTTSI...........................SALTAMW...........
.......yL _
IHAMMONDI.....................SIMS..........................�G WOODRUFF.....................JC
INOYESI...........4..............DEBAY......................... . ARMKIS..........................
—
IPERRVI...........................PEMVMAN...................JG KNOPF.............................JG
MUTZ).............................610GUIGAN................. LEE.................................—
I000NTZI........................"MY................. LINDSTROM.....................
lsPERI........................ST ER................. NIXON.............................
—
SH A W............................._
DISTRICT 11 STONE............................
(HARMANI.......................SETTOFF..................... —
ISMNERII.......................6 R..AN.....................
ISiEINERI........................BPOZER.......................
DISTRICT 13
(PARKER).........................OUNUP.......................�
DYMNERI.........................OULMSON..................g�
15PRZEIO........................81EMER.........................
(COONT21.............4..........MURAW....................... I —
WA Ln............................Z9MEt..........................
DISTRICT 14
MAMMONDI..................n 0111.......................... F�
(MMI...........................SALTARELLI................... _
ICOONTZI........................WIMW.-....................
� —
ISP ERI........................STEINER....................... _
IMILLERI..........................SWAN.......................... —
\bW—Betel%wP.dtnlndminlOSIDIRECTOROimcton Roll CHLdoc.W
01/28198
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 held on u 199f was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on a'EYdffn..L as . I Rf
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this -1.�dday of
19 !
Penny Kyle, Sec&tary/dfjeach of the
Boards of Directors of rdbunty Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
of Orange County, California
BSIFmmtlFDA
41:
IwW OPN6t Of
WOODRUFF, SPRADLW & SMART
A MIR IOM.M.COR 014
'b1 SOUTH PAARER SrREFT,SUmi TDW ORANGE,CA 93S6S M F/14)531] FAX(714)UJ TTV
DIRECT Dl (714)5662605
DIRECT FAE(714)5 25
January 6, 1998
VIA MESSENGER
Mr. J.B. Richter
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer & President
PennWilson CNG
12118 South Bloomfield
Santa Fe Springs, Ca. 90670
Re: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
Purchase Order No 60057 Specification No E-265
Dear Mr. Richter:
Having not had even the courtesy of a reply to my previous letter to you dated
December 16, 1997, setting forth the demands of my client that PennWilson CNG
immediately make arrangements for the shipment of that certain Skid Mounted Compressor
manufactured by your firm and which is ready for delivery and installation, my client has
directed this office to undertake several measures in order to perfect their legal position
and enforce their legal rights.
In the course of preparing to do this, we have discovered a great deal of information
concerning the recent activities of PennWilson CNG, and as a last effort to resolve this
matter on a high-class, business approach, I thought it important to set forth to you those
items which the Sanitation Districts consider to be extremely important.
As we know, the equipment has been manufactured pursuant to the above-
referenced Purchase Order and the incorporated contract documents. We have proof that
all of the manufacturing processes and the records of your firm reflect that the
Compressor, which is located on your site in Santa Fe Springs, identifies this piece of
equipment has having been manufactured specifically for the County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County. We have learned that representatives of PennWilson are asserting that
they have no contractual obligation to deliver except on a schedule of their own choosing.
I want to assure you that as the Sanitation Districts' Legal Counsel, we have carefully
reviewed this, and there is voluminous documentation in the form of correspondence,
.YC M' •MMT E BLT140•M,WISB_'flnl[ BkTIY C.RURf1ETi•GM E Ch A.WW O O.FAPRPl.710N•RWF ILRIX
%1ffiNW Wm1TH RLL91.KPI(t6W0IX IMiEIERPEY•I WN MTW-W -SIFT@!M.MIM•TROMM F..
lA4W ERESlIIX IOId0.91.FW RpNMD0.SMARI.AL ONlE1.9FN� ON It SMdIN•N 0.WATIS•TROMb L MO L77
Mr. J.B. Richter
January 6, 1998
Page 2
memoranda and other written materials, that establish in fact, a promise on the part of
PennWilson to ship upon completion. The willful and intentional failure to do so at this
time should make the proof of that, if necessary in a court of law, a rather simple task.
We have also been advised by the Chief Operating Officer of your Firm, in a
conversation with the Districts' Director of General Services Administration, that the
apparent intent and plan of PennWilson is to sell this to another buyer because of the
opportunity to perhaps realize an additional $80,000.00 purchase price. I can only
conclude that that is a sum of money that will be lost many times over if the breach of this
contract that has been made by PennWilson is not immediately cured. If the prospect of
a mere $80,000.00 additional revenue is the driving force, I would suggest that that is a
very poor business choice, for the Sanitation Districts have been and will continue to be
incurring considerable damages that will far exceed that, including our having to terminate
the existing contract with our on-site installation contractor, Airpol, and to award a new
contract at such time as a Compressor becomes available for installation.
Additionally, we have outstanding obligations to Pima Gro, who has now completed
conversion of its trucks for fueling based upon the Sanitation Districts' representation of
availability of compressed natural gas for fueling. We also have absolute agreements with
the South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD'), the relevant regulatory
agency in Southern California, for the conduct of this business. Apart from the fact that
your Firm, in the course of engaging in this business, will have frequent dealings with
SCAQMD, which has been a financial contributor to this overall program being carried out
by the Districts. We stand a sizeable risk of forfeiting the financial participation by
SCAQMD if we are unable to have the system operational within the next few weeks.
As noted above, my client has directed me to undertake any and all measures
necessary to enforce our legal rights. First, it is our intention to immediately file litigation
in the Superior Court of the State of California and will in fact attempt to even seek
restraining orders or injunctive relief, as well as speck performance and damages, on the
basis that the equipment has been custom designed and manufactured for my client, and
we will suffer irreparable damages in the event we are unable to have this particular unit
of equipment delivered and installed forthwith. Even in the absence of obtaining injunctive
relief, the continued delay of many months will, of course, cause us to incur, as noted,
considerable financial damages which we will seek.
-4
Mr. J.B. Richter
January 6, 1998
Page 3
1 want to assure you that the Sanitation Districts have a long-standing, excellent
record of business transactions with our thousands of vendors and contractors over many
years. The Districts typically award more than $50 million in contracts each fiscal year,
and in the more than 2 decades that we have represented them, the Districts have been
engaged in business litigation only 2 or 3 times. Our client's reputation is one of
accommodation, but at the same time, when encountering willful and intentional
misconduct by our vendors or contractors, it takes a very strong position of enforcement.
For the benefit of yourself and perhaps your Legal Counsel, I would refer you to our most
recent business transaction that the Districts were compelled to litigate which resulted in
an award being made in Superior Court of$6.4 million in punitive damages against United
Technologies Corporation because of its willful and intentional misrepresentation and
fraud relating to the Districts' purchase of materials pursuant to contract.
The fads in the United Technolocies case, as they relate to the actions to date by
PennWilson, are remarkably similar, and the willful and intentional breach will afford the
Sanitation Districts the opportunity to seek that redress.
Secondly, I have just recently completed a review of the quarterly report filed by
Penn Octane Corporation, pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities &
Exchange Act of 1934, for the quarterly period ended October 31, 1997 and filed on
December 15, 1997. The Form 10-QSB makes several references therein, specifically to
this sale and purchase contract between Penn Octane/PennWilson-CNG and the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County, and is clearly a significant item of concern with
regards to transactions and the financial status of both the parent and subsidiary
corporations. I will be immediately filing a request with the SEC to provide supplemental
data and to be asking for the opportunity to have a full investigation concerning the
accuracy and truthfulness of the representations set forth in that report. In recognition of
the filing date of December 15, 1997, which was subsequent to the action on the part of
your Firm to refuse to ship the Compressor, clearly indicates an intentional
misrepresentation in that mandatory filing form.
Additionally, if our investigation confines that the equipment may in fact be shipped
out of the United States to a foreign location, it is our intention to seek intervention by the
United States Trade Commission and other federal regulatory authorities regarding any
export licenses so as to bar the movement of that equipment until it ran be resolved, as
necessary, in a court of law, or by mutual agreement of the parties.
Mr. J.B. Richter
January 6, 1998
Page 4
In summary, I must indicate to you that my client is simply outraged at the lack of
honest and forthright action on the part of your Finn, and accordingly, intends to fully carry
forth every possible means of redress to enforce their rights and to minimize their
damages. At the same time, I want to assure you that if arrangements can be made for
the immediate shipment from the Santa Fe Springs facility of the Districts' Compressor to
the Districts' site, so as to allow their contractor to proceed with the installation prior to
their having to terminate his contract next week, all of the enforcement actions can be
avoided.
I urge that you give this your most serious consideration and to advise me directly
by return mail or telephone.
Very truly yours,
WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART
m�
T OMAS L. WOODRUFF
ENERALCOUNSEL - CSDOC
nwPI
cc: Boards of Directors
General Manager
Director of General Services Administration
Contracts Administrator
d'
I.AY'OF}1CPSOF
d WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART
A PlOFF8410NALCORPoMTON .
MI SOUTH PARKER STREET,SUM 7D K ORANGE,CA T-R 720•(714)M7000 FAX(714)10i7
DIRECT DIAL(714)5 0.2,K*
DIRECT FAX(714)S 2$Xi
January 9, 1998
United States Securities & Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attention: Report Filing Division
Re: Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of Security Exchange Act of 1934 (Form ID-QSB)
Registrant: Penn Octane Corporation
Registrant's Address: 900 Veterans Blvd., Suite 240
Redwood City, California 94063
IRS Employer Id. No. 52-1790357
Quarterly Period Ending: October 31, 1997
SEC FILE NO.: 000-24394
FILM NO. 97738728
Gentlemen:
Please be advised this office represents the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, California("Districts"), a governmental agency formed and existing pursuant to the laws
of the State of California. The Districts are party to a significant agreement with the Registrant,
Penn Octane Corporation, and its subsidiary, Penn Wilson CNG.
A review of the Quarterly Report referenced above reflects several specific references to
the subject agreement, and we wish to provide information to the Commission and in turn a
request to receive notice of further proceedings.
The above-referenced Quarterly Report indicates that on October 21, 1997, the
Registrant Company announced the contemplated filing of a Registration Statement with the
Commission for the sale to the public of additional shares of its common stock. In recognition of
this, Districts believe it important to bring to the attention of the Commission a major issue on the
contract, in recognition of the fact that it is specifically referenced in the Quarterly Report.
[Reference Part 1, Item 2]
The Districts have paid all monies due under the terms of the Purchase Agreement (total
purchase price of$251,494.97). Actual payments to date are in the amount of$176,046.48. The
balance, pursuant to the terms of the contract, is due upon delivery and acceptance of the
equipment subject to the Purchase Agreement.
TERRY C.A V$•.E RMNL'O•M.14L4ROBEH•REm C.RIAUER•IOHN E GVA n1:GH OWOO.FMRIF'GION•RUDF R..
IOSEAI W.FORBM -q '.1CRK MGEA•WM E IEFFREY MnGDA UJNA-WIAT-WnT%L M.MAPS"..AS F..IXM
IAS(IN E.ROWM•MMK.RUW•KE T'NNR.SMART.M.•DAMEI.RFL 0 DAUFLK.SFWUN•A N R.WATR•MIOMAR L M MIFF
6
Securities & Exchange Commission
January 9, 1998
Page 2
The Quarterly Report makes reference to the fact that PennWilson CNG/Penn Octane
obtained a Letter of Credit guaranteeing performance,which Letter expired November 26, 1997.
Said Districts allowed said Letter to expire based on the actual representation by Registrant
Company that the equipment was being shipped to the contract delivery site. The equipment
manufacture has been completed, and the equipment is specifically designed for and has been
identified physically and by all documentary records as equipment for Districts, pursuant to said
Agreement.
Immediately following the release of the Letter of Credit, Registrant Company refused to
ship the equipment, which is presently in shipping containers located on the Registrant
Company's property in Los Angeles County, California.
There are no contractual disputes over payment of any sums, and the Districts have
performed all terms and conditions of the Agreement, and no claims to the contrary have been
asserted by Registrant Company. Due.to the willful and intentional breach of the contract and
the misrepresentation and possible fraud on the part of Registrant Company, and its subsidiary,
and its officers and employees, Districts intend to file suit in the Superior Court for the State of
California at the earliest possible date, and in no event later than January 16, 1998, seeking
damages and specific performance.
It is the opinion of the Districts that the above-referenced Quarterly Report Form 140SB
is a willful misrepresentation, in that it was filed December 15, 1997, 6 days following a
December 9, 1997 letter signed by Mr. John Weber, President and Chief Operating Officer of
PennWilson CNG, advising that the equipment manufactured for Districts was being used to
satisfy another customer's needs (i.e., resold to another customer) and would not be shipped to
the Districts, notwithstanding that all scheduled payments have been timely made by Districts.
There is no evidence of production of new equipment to satisfy the terms of the Purchase
Agreement.
We believe that the Vice-President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Ian T.
Bothwell, knowingly signed the above-referenced Form 10-QSB, which referenced the sale and
scheduled delivery of the equipment pursuant to the contract to Districts, notwithstanding his
personal knowledge that the Registrant Company was intentionally breaching its contract,
retaining the revenues paid by Districts, and willfully refusing to deliver the purchased equipment
without cause.
This information is provided to the Commission as an extraordinary case, in recognition of
the fact that Registrant Company has proposed the issuance of stock based upon the 1997
corporate activities of forming Wilson Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; Penn
CNG Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; and the organization of its wholly-owned subsidiary
PennWilson CNG, and based upon the Quartedy Report which places particular emphasis on the
fact that the Company was awarded 2 contracts, 1 of which is with the Districts, as referenced
5
i
Securities & Exchange Commission
January 9, 1998
Page 3
above. They have indicated no success in entering into any additional CNG contracts, and in
recognition of contemplated litigation and contract disputes, the Quarterly Report may not be an
accurate reflection of the financial condition and results of operation.
On behalf of the Districts, we would request that the Commission make inquiry into the
accuracy and validity of the information supplied by the Registrant Company in the above-
referenced report, to take all measures to insure that any proposed issuance of stock to the
public is based solely upon full, complete, accurate and truthful information.
Districts further request that they be given notice of any actions taken by the Commission,
including requests for information, and Districts will agree to cooperate and supply any
information requested by the Commission.
Very truly yours,
WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART
CCu '
OMAS L. WOODRUFF
GENERAL COUNSEL- CSDOC
nwq
cc: County Sanitation Districts Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts General Manager
Mr. J.B. Richter, Chairman/CEO, Penn Wilson CNG (Texas)
Mr. John Weber, Vice President/COO, Penn Wilson CNG (Santa Fe Springs)
Mr. Ian Bothwell, Vice President/CFO, Penn Octane (Redwood City)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
r
January 21, 1998
phone:
(7141962-2411
mailing address: To the Chair and Members
RD.Bo.8127 of the Joint Boards of Directors
F Untaln Valley.CA
5272ea127 Subject: Board Letter
street addhae.:
10644 Boa Avenue
R°"92w0-7'G4 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
s2]o6-]CCA 9 Y Y 9
information on any of the items, please call me.
Districts Qualifies for the AMSA Gold Award
Memher
Aenc"e I am pleased to inform you that, because of the excellent work by all staff, the
0 Districts did not experience a single treatment plant permit violation during 1997. In
Cities recognition of this accomplishment, the Districts has qualified for an Association of
Anahaim Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) Gold Award for 1997. AMSA is the
Brea national organization that represents the interest of the country's wastewater
Buena Park treatment agencies. AMSA member agencies serve the majority of the sewered
Cyprass population in the United Slates that collectively treat and reclaim more than 17 billion
Fountain ✓alley
wllarton gallons of wastewater each day.
Huntington Beach
IfVlna La Ha For the past 11 years, AMSA has recognized member agencies that demonstrate a
La Palms
high level of performance in meeting NPDES permit requirements. We anticipate that
Los Alamitos the Gold Award will be presented to the Districts during AMSA's Annual Meeting in
Hewpof< raach
nge Jul at Colorado Springs, Colorado. Shorn thereafter we will receive a certificate that
Orange YY
Placentia we will display.
Sane Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tuavh SCCWRP Open House
Ville Park
mrna ands Many Board members may be familiar with the Southern California Coastal Water
County of Drange Research Project (known as SCCWRP, pronounced "squirp"), a joint powers authority
created by the four largest Southern California wastewater treatment plant operators,
sanitary Districts including the Districts. SCCWRP conducts research on all aspects of the impacts on
the health of the Southern California marine environment, with special attention to the
Costa Mesa impacts of discharges from wastewater treatment plants. On February 12, beginning
Garoen Grave P 9 P ry 9 9
Midway city at 3:30 p.m., SCCWRP will be hosting an Open House at its offices and research
facilities in Westminster. A copy of the announcement and directions are attached to
Water Districts this letter. You are welcome to attend. Contact Nancy Wheatley for details.
Irvine Ranch
A Public Wastewater and Enviranmentsl Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 7954
Members of the Boards of Directors
Page 2
January 21, 1998
Sewer Service Rates Stabilize Accordino to 1997 AMSA Index
When compared to this year's 2.4% change in the Consumer Price Index, the 2.1%
increase in residential sewer service rates reflected by the 1997 AMSA Index is good
news for ratepayers. The AMSA Index is an annual survey of average residential
service charges prepared by the Association's Financing and Management
Committee. It reflects the responses of AMSA member agencies in each region of
the United States.
The 1997 AMSA Index of 208.2 is based on the responses of 154 agencies. Of these
agencies, 146 also provided data for 1996. These 146 responses were used to
calculate the population-weighted service charge increase for residential users
nationwide of 2.1%from 1996 to 1997. Overall, 88% of AMSA member agencies
participated in the latest survey.
Update on Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR)
IN Pickler, Chairman of the Joint GWR Cooperative Committee, sent letters to
Orange County's mayors, city councils and representatives in Sacramento,
introducing the GWR project. I am attaching a copy of one of the letters, in the event
you haven't seen it. If you have questions on the project, you can contact Tom
Dawes at the OCWD, or Jim Herberg, our staff representative, at 714/593-7310.
Update on Orange County Bankruptcy Activities
Attached is a faxed letter dated January 13, 1998 updating ongoing activities
regarding settlement funds. Blake Anderson is our representative, and you can
contact him at 71 415 93-71 1 0 if you have questions.
Consolidation Update
We are on schedule for a July 1 consolidation date. The County Board of
Supervisors, at their January 13 meeting, adopted a resolution determining that 100
percent of property tax revenues be distributed to a consolidated Sanitation District.
This tax exchange issue was a consent calendar item. The Districts' consolidation
will be heard by LAFCO during their February 11 meeting. We anticipate that our
application for consolidation will be approved by LAFCO and forwarded to the Board
of Supervisors, who act as the Conducting Authority, for the protest hearing. That
hearing will be held in late March/early April. Included in your agenda packet today is
a letter to the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) reaffirming the Districts'
commitment to continuing our contractual agreements with that agency. This letter
was requested by IRWD during a meeting with Districts' staff earlier this month.
Members of the Boards of Directors
Page 3
January 21, 1998
December CALTrans Shootinas
You will recall that a former CALTrans employee opened fire in a CALTrans
maintenance yard in December killing four people. The gunman, Arturo Reyes
Tortes, who was killed at the scene by police, had been an employee of the Districts
from December 1-11. 1997. He worked in the Collection Facilities Operations and
Maintenance Division, but was let go as he did not meet the physical requirements of
the job.
Manhole Pluaaina and Sealina Program
In an effort to prevent surface water infiltration, the Districts has supplied manhole
plugs and seals to Brea. Fountain valley, Newport Beach and Yorba Linda. Staff will
be evaluating storm Bows to study the effects. If any Director is interested in taking
part in this program, please call Nick Arhontes at 714/593-7210, or have your Director
of Public Works contact Nick.
Filming on Districts' Property
Several film studios have, in the past, used Districts' property for commercials,
advertising, and films. Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, is
responsible for negotiating these agreements. In December, Triage Entertainment
indicated an interest in using the hallways in the laboratory for a one-day shoot;
however, due to conflicts with their personnel it did not take place. I'm including this
information as an indication of just one of the revenue opportunities that exist for the
Districts. There is no predetermined daily rate for leasing our facilities; each request
is considered separately.
1997-98 Budget receives GFOA Award
The Districts' has been advised that we have received the Distinguished Budget
Presentation Award for Fiscal Year 1997-98 from the Government Finance Officers
Association. According to GFOA, this award is the highest form of recognition in
govemmental budgeting, and its attainment represents a significant achievement by
our organization. One budget reviewer noted that the section on Division budgets
was very informative and very well put together, and that the performance objectives,
measures, and results were outstanding.
Staff members directly involved in this effort are: Gary Streed, Mike White, Dan
Dillon, Laurie Arnold, and Danny Evangelista.
Members of the Boards of Directors
Page 4
January 21, 1998
Focus on A Season of Change
I have included a copy of a presentation given by John R. Wodraska, General
Manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, that discusses
changes in the future of Southern California water policies. I think you will find it very
informative.
Orange County Litigation Fund
Enclosed are several pages from the Orange County Litigation Fund, Combined
Financial Statements report dated June 30, 1997, which was prepared by Wright Ford
Browning & Young, Certified Public Accountants and Consultants, Inc., an
independent auditor for the County of Orange. This information provides a good
outline of the bankruptcy and litigation issues.
Thanks from the OC COG
As some of you may know, OC COG has been using the Board Room for their
monthly meetings. Enclosed is a letter of appreciation Laurann Cook, Chair of OC
COG and Mayor of Fountain Valley,
Odor Complaints
Two Plant No. 1 odor complaints were received on December 31 and January 8.
Both complaints were from residents of Fountain Valley, living close to Ward Street.
As a routine, staff checked odor sources around complainants' residences, performed
the odor rounds within the plant, checked wind direction, influent treatment and
scrubber processes conditions.
Results of the investigation indicated:
• Staff could not smell sewage at either residence
• Odor rounds showed normal readings
• The wind was blowing in the direction of the residences
• Influent treatment and scrubber operations were normal
Field staff determined that the treatment plant was not the odor source. Odors could
have come from the Districts, as well as the Orange County Water District or the
nursery at Garfield and Ward. Since the wind was blowing across the plant and
toward the residences, it was impossible to identify the odor source.
Members of the Boards of Directors
Page 5
January 21, 1998
Recent Publications of Interest
Enclosed are recently published articles of issues that affect the Districts that you may
not have seen.
If you wo Id Jikitia/l�pfortnation on any of the above items, please call me.
Donald F. McIntyre
General Manager
DFM:jt
H1WP.nrAwauHwnmr ARo.Lmarzeue.00c
Attachments: SCCWRP Open House Announcement
Copy of Iry Pickier's letters introducing Groundwater Replenishment
System Project
January 13, 1998 letter re OCIP Settlement Funds
Focus on A Season of Change by John Wodraska, MWDSC
Excerpt from Orange County Litigation Fund, Combined Financial
Statements
December 11, 1997 letter from OC COG Chair Laurann Cook
Recently Published Articles
Please join
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
at our
OPEN HOUSE
Thursday, February 12, 1998
3:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m.
7171 Fenwick Lane, Westminster, CA
(map on reverse side)
A unique opportunity to learn about our work
Speakers
Tours
Demonstrations
For further information
call us at (714) 894-2222
or visit our web site at www.sccwrp.org
Directions to
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
7171I Fenwick Lane, Westminster, CA
(714) 894-2222
m
see a'
m Ok Fenwick Lane
m 90/ >
'ro io
3 S'Jf m t
m ^eg U 0
C9
Bolsa Ave.
Traveling southbound on the San Diego (405) freeway
Exit at Bolsa Ave.
Turn left at Chestnut(the first light)
Turn left at Fenwick (one block north of Bolsa)
SCCWRP is the first building on the right
Traveling northbound on the San Diego (405) freeway
Exit at Beach Blvd.
Proceed north on Beach
Turn left at Bolsa(appx. 1-1/2 mi.)
Turn right at Chestnut(appx. 1 mi.)
Turn left at Fenwick (one block north of Bolsa)
SCCWRP is the first building on the right
Groundwater
Replenishment System
December 31, 1997
The Honorable Ross Johnson
California State Senator
18552 MacArthur Blvd., #395
Irvine, CA 92715
Dear Senator Johnson:
I am writing to encourage your support of an exciting and much needed water reclamation project that will
provide over 100,000 acre feet of new water to the Orange County area each year, enough water to satisfy
the needs of over 200,000 families. I head a joint committee of the directors of the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County and the Orange County Water District who are sponsoring the Groundwater
Replenishment System. If implemented, the Groundwater Replenishment System would be the largest
water reclamation project In the nation.
As you know, Southern California is dependent on an increasingly less reliable and high-priced imported
water supply. With significant population increases facing us in the next twenty years, we will have even
greater demands placed on our limited local water supplies. Unfortunately, there are few new water
sources available, especially in Southern Califomia. Agricultural water transfers are difficult to achieve,
desalination is too costly, and the CalFed process is not likely to result in significant new water supplies for
the Southland. The most cost effective means to deal with increased water needs is through water
reclamation augmented by conservation.
The Groundwater Replenishment System will have multiple benefits for the Orange County area. It will
take highly treated wastewater now sent to the ocean and treat it through reverse osmosis and
microfiltration to standards that will exceed all drinking water requirements. Some of the water will then be
naturally percolated into the Orange County's large underground water basin where it will actually improve
the quality of our groundwater by reducing salinity and total dissolved solids (TDS). This new high-quality
water will then be available for the growing number of future residents and businesses. The rest of the
water will be used for irrigation, industrial use, and for protecting the basin from salt water intrusion.
I believe the Groundwater Replenishment System can provide an exceptionally high-quality new water at a
cost that is comparable to, or less expensive than future imported water. If you or your staff would like
additional information, a special briefing, or a tour of our Groundwater Replenishment System advanced
technology facilities in Fountain Valley, California, please call me (714-578-9555 Fart. 238) or our Project
Manager, Thomas M. Dawes, (714-378-3205) at your earliest convenience. The Groundwater
Replenishment System is the future of effective water management in California and other water restricted
areas.
Iry Pic
Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee
A pee effort of Oe Onmr Comq Ware,N m aM ft Ceumr Sommum Disoias of Omnge County
(714)378.3200 • Fax(714)378.3373 • I OS00 Ellis Avenua • Founmin Valley • Califomia 92708
V
Groundwater D M `
w Replenishment System
January 7, 1998
The Honorable Don Bankhead and City Council Members
City of Fullerton
303 W. Commonwealth Avenue
Fullerton, CA92632-1775
Dear Mayor Bai�klWed: -
As you may have read recently in the local newspapers, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County (CSDOC) and the Orange County Water District(OCWD) are jointly sponsoring the study of an
exciting new water project—the Groundwater Replenishment System—that will ultimately provide our
area with 100,000 acre-feet per year of new, high-quality drinking water, enough to satisfy the water
needs of 200,000 families.
The Groundwater Replenishment System will take highly treated wastewater now sent to the ocean
and treat it through state-of-the-art, energy-efficient microfiltration and reverse osmosis processes to
standards that will exceed all drinking water requirements. Some of the water will then be naturally
percolated into Orange County's large, underground water basin where it will actually improve the
quality of our groundwater by reducing its overall salinity. The remainder of the water will be used for
irrigation, industrial use, and for pre!^cting the basin from seawater intrusion.
Extensive environmental, feasibility and economic studies are currently underway, however, our own
initial studies, confirmed by an outside team of financial experts, indicate that the project is cost
effective especially when compared to the cost of future imported water. We have launched these
studies recognizing that the population of Fullerton and other Orange County cities will continue to
grow rapidly over the next twenty years. We feel it will be difficult, if not impossible, to meet future
water needs without a program like this, especially if there are less than normal rainfall conditions, not
to mention a drought.
Both agencies are committed to assuring that the communities they serve have a reliable, high-quality
water supply, and feel that an innovative project such as the Groundwater Replenishment System,
coupled with conservation, is the only realistic alternative. The County Sanitation Districts, as part of
their Strategic Plan, are currently evaluating ways to further enhance our water supply through
improvements to existing water conservation programs.
Enclosed is some additional information about the Groundwater Replenishment System for you and
your Council members. Our Project Manager, Tom Dawes, is also available to provide any additional
information you may desire and would like to conduct a city council study session on this important
project. We look forward to working with you and your city on this vital component of our future water
supply.
Since
Iry Pickier, Chairman
Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee
Enclosure Apra effort uftlre OmngeCovVWiner Dinner end she County Senimdon Dinnce:of Omnre Cooney
(714) 378-3200 • Fax(714) 378-3373 10500 Ellis Avenue • Founnin valley California 92708
J0.N 13 '92 16;43 M PILLS6RY MRD I56V 619 236 19 TO 18 P.02
Pilllssbbnry
5R® N c�T®awwr VIM two
sAX tffiln GwLWNA mntan
iw9ttvtG (etq a»!Ow fAx(tl%rlLtlS
Madiwon a
Sutro LLP
ctim',dorm 5.l�h,e/1
(619) 544-3177
January 13, 1998
VIA FACSIMILE
TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL
PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST
Re: In re Cowin of re County of Orao_ gc
Dear Pool Participants:
We continue to monitor the status of various post-confirmation issue$ in the County's
bankruptcy tau.
On December 23, 1997, Bankruptcy Judge Ryan approved the OCIP compromise with
the County regarding the $30 million in settlement fiords from settlement of the Merrill Lynch
investigation by the District Attorneys office, and $17.6 million of additional funds.
On January 12, 1998, United States District Judge Gary Taylor considered Fuji's
Motion for Partial Summary Judgmevt on the Pleadings. The matter was taken under
submission, and when we receive Judge Taylor's ruling, we will advise you of the outcome.
During the next several months, the District Court will consider two motions in the
Merrill Lynch civil action which may impact the case. On February 9, 1998, the Court will
consider Merrill Lynch's Motion to Transfer Venue to a Federal Court located outside of
California On March 16, 1999, the Court will consider Merrill Lynch's Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment-
We will contact you soon regarding distribution of settlemem funds, the Court's ruling
on the Fuji motion and any additional information regarding these matters.
lust rvao tin wtwau Mar eau aurce tvtnrtr e.eAAtaatm sw rsAwsw sum.vwuAv'rvwvmw-my ere w+o rtrc rorro
211r
.. SAN 13 '98 16:43 FR PILLSBURY WIDISON 619 236 1995 TO 18 P.03
Orange County Official Investment Pool
Participants' Committee and Counsel
Jamaay 13. 1998
Page 2
If you have any questions, Please do not Lesitate to contact me.
very WA ours,
P
a: Tom Hayes
Official Investment Pool Participants'
Committee and Counsel
ao�
cw TQTRL PAGE.03 v
wvla an....Vo.
A SEASON OF CHANGE
by
1.6c R Wook., Qnecl Ala.
M,.*.m lVorm,Do., (Svithere Wfe.
Provide,
Men,1.R. .W.Pky Somman,
I-AnP.i C-kf—.
Drumbe,2.1997
................................................... ..... ..................
I'd Ulm us talk to you today about change.Ift`e aU that suppirs southern California Is a massive of renewable
experienced charge we di nexach,jobs and socomi ent value,a resource to be protected in all cons.Each of
mars our spouses.Those of in who grew up in places other Metampothen!s..be,agentles is.tionsaft of that reamme
Than southern Cididonam have been lucky enough to witness with a fiduciary responsibility to one mother and to the
the change of assames.Change cm be good.It usually means region as 2 whole.U them is to be change,ks it be change
progress and improvements.And demise Is almost always the to improve the system,not in pick it apart,bit by In,and
much elan mohmonary process thei blends;the scaldfity of risk destroying it.
the past with the potential of the fircre,
When we talk about the fincre ofSDthe.California A Rebirth of the Water Industry
water,we're talking about change...change in supply and Pound at the duredmid of the 2 lat caustury,we're pan
demand,change In military regulation and change in The my of a mbinh of the water industry it's the springtime of our
we manage water resources.But we Ming dist does not sessional cycle.Everything is fresh and new and the possuldli-
charge is die water policy must be governed by a possuccom was are endless.CAJJED,.connection of sere and federal
concern for the public we".MaahuluRg the reliability, alleades,is preparing in defiver its preferred intricate for
sidequaty and safety of the water supply and remaining fix solving the problems of The Bay-Delta.Negotiations an
cost are at the win of public interest and most be considered underway within Cadman and with the other six Colorado
the highest priority in airy debate over over inces. River Basin stores to forroulase a comprehensive California
A Regional Solution to Water Management Plan for Colorado River waver.
The"or industry has moved into a new am in which
The itiongrood water delivery system..aged by the the economic and arvimnmmul unnegrity,of our water
Metropolitan Water Distrux and its 27 member agencies is an delivery moom ts hist as important as the engineering need
unparalleled Southern,California resource.It Is,in fact,the lexce.Metropolitan is confidern that we are well positioned
epitome of a high-quefiry,not-for-profit service noterprace, to change with The notes,
Metropolitan wan simulated by an as of The me Behind That offingraces to lunge he the dericts nown
Legislature to serve the public,to assure a reliable supply of values:public service,water sicarrin innighly and mammon.
The highest quality sever it The loam possible cos.Nothang; The 21a money will be the eve of the commencinven utility.
has happened to alter this purpose. 0 we are to survive,we must be prepared to provide ow.
Back in 1928,Metropolitan was forced to build and exceding reamincr service in a comporeatim marker
operate the Colorado River Aqueduct to being supplesesual
water to South=California.Whim commudoo of the A Vision for the Future
sapseduct was completed in 1941,we literally gave sway,the The vialm for the furore is clear Metropolitan is seeking
wind supply of water how to get the public to stet wiling,it. the hout possible means to cauxure the region has what it
We offered discounts for agricultural weer in more years mads to metric and nowashm.reliable,Safe,efficiew supply
to support the operation of the system.In fan,we still do. of water.Working with cur member and sompandox,w
More aim half a come,later.Metropolitan delivers have developed an integrated Resources Plan.M diversified
each year from the State Warner Project and The Colorado approach to resource resexposent includes not only import.
River newly 60 Perim(ofSouthem California's nower supply ad weer scipfdes lam.balance of 1.0 resources such.
This wism Is delivered&tough Mivwpoktxxns hawbodon conservation,reclamation,groundwater sumage,recovery
syntax:775 aides of papetum,eight rescamem,and file fihm- and coutmetive war as well as dessalwaffican.
not phase.This unique asycess,sallfics the fife-blood-for Since the IRP was named in 1993,Motimpolnut has
Southern California,and the surn of the whole synew is fir invested more dam$3 billion to developing local resources.
greater than its parts No singe member agency could cown With them documents,the djawnt will be IN percent ask.
on a reliable water supply without the emit,system. able for at true The next 10 year .evert under a repent of
To put the value of Metropolitan m perspective,Blow 1991 drought conditions.Th.,innestiorms;have not,manner.
current contaminated and political malitia,you couldi placed a ficanced hardship on our member agencies.
build This system today.sold sman 9 you could build it.you Mcowwolwxss hill service untreated"ter rate is only
Weddisil afford to pay for 31.The me of our service to exuar. expected to increace,by less than one percent over then.
survers 6 far below The replacement cons of the Wcon. 10 mart.Adjusting for furnme,inflawor.the duscrica'a over
This brings as back in the mind to protect the public me in the year 2007 will be mbs=JaUy less than it is today
interest throughout this period of dwagc.The enter station
P.bl.xhird is he., ... ...ices
.... ............ .. .......
Meme,mbigns Soil Is as marg,the public interest on the me terms.But Monopoles owning and will no
through practices,based on sound economic and fiessend jeopardize the reliability and Sued soundivess,of the regional
primples.We ran only commum to in"[our public service system
goal 9 W remain finarcially, In his regard,[at me note thm MeuropolwwY water
The continuing effectiveness of Metropolignat's water transport policy is to be neutral regarding monomer chose.
delivery system depends on its finummal Integrity,and,so far, We try to charge the romen surnmart to more other water
we've been able to maronalm Out Integn7y jus,two weeks ago through our"we as we charge to mine out mom water.
the degront Ismand$650 offlion in wt.,revenue bonds.I IS other order 6 cheaper than M,.pObm water,It will
an pleased to repot that Standard and Pm resigned IN men competitively through our symori.
double,'R rating to this bond seeks This rating reflects the Timelier cans only become an issue If the transferred
soundness of Mnurupoiiuw3 final policies and the confidence water 0 more uspernme than Metropolmers ower.In that
of the flumecial commonly in our regional veer delivery now,the summer will have in decide whether the vine of
signs,programs and management. an shergame to Metropoluan assin is words the ern e.g.
This Is why t is an imponsaw to maintain the stability For example,efforts by rodividual Menropolman member
and fiscid situations of MeuwpodnnY regional supply,Omvn. tilmorches to develop givemer,der-system reliability may have
More than 16 million people depend on it.The swung a higher con than systrow-wid,allows.Thou who ch.,
works because it's an hawgumed,multi-faceted approach higher rediabdaythrough exim-sysecon means should be
to 1011if4egin regrartid nefte man2gManL expected 10 pay dim cost.One regain memo[be expected
But maintaining our finagamad Integrity takes cannot to subsidize the MOO that mother region pum on alternative
vigilance.Some interest or other is alwast always smoking to nume supplies.
take advantage of our signse a the experne,of some other
interns Needless to say,this vigilarce has IN politick core, A Commitment to Swcaned
and serrournot Metropolitan jug has to bear there polnical M the same's largest purveyor of treated drodws;water,
cosm in order to provers the overall public honest. Metropolitan wourres the fires sham of responsibility for
A "No Ham"Approach to Water 7numfers the security and reliability of Southern CAfforma*s water
supply This Is a responsibility we do not take lightly.We
Who don all of this mean for Our negaithations our me Commonly exploring ways to mum greater reliability
nomr,managers;begins,Metropolitan,The Sam Diego county by developing broader system resources and by using our
Water Authority and the Imports]Irrigation Districa? economies sale for the benefit of all of our numbers.
Metropolitan surono supports,water mussfins.We What does this am in moms of regional benefits?To
encourage the development of addimunil,lower cam,water provide the region aids emergiong supplies.we're building
resources,by my party.To the went that our common On Sewhere CidlfiornO largest drinking water regavolt,dou-
do it boa for lee,well emouninge and asses them.However, bling our surfine sat age capacity I've already shared with
we have a responsibility to all of our camuners not to indoor you our diverse Integrated Routines Plan for long-term
the basic principles of effident and equitode com-recoway. water misturce management.Were providing the means by
We caurm,sacrifice system sim-recovery in order to submim, width members can agree with other members to uwasin
water munfers.On the other had,mod cost-rectivery surplus water in periods of short supity.we're also providing
practices me Judy consistent visit effichaut"Itursary trainsfiss the means for gunner reliability to dim members who are
of water and water wheeling and will prevent molotable wiUmS to pay for is
cost-shifting among our customers. The 20th nantry saw,the sparsely populated Southerm
In a merm smagment to the iumMy Weser,Parks and Califtervot doessam sum into one of the most prosperous and
Wildlife Common,Corrosion Chairman Michael Madrado datable region in the would.Behind this transformation is
said,"We need a water trader policy thin is him to all ,swer,of winter.h began I.the em,days with mience and
participate.We mund a water orturifir policy Sea pan water technology.When William Mulholland built the Los Mgelca
when It is needed at a price that a reasonable...and allows Aqueduct,he was,faced with a monumental eingmearmit few.
Niger mention so long in the morwasocom no dim not From dime early days No moved into an cm driven more
produce a windfall prolm" by regulation than technology.State and federal regulators
Metropolitan supports this portion and is romovelued to imposed more and mom stringent rquirmanums on the
facilitating such transient providing them an no third-parry health and safiny of the water wo dolbegod But today our
brings.But them transfers may result In megaton nomadic industry has mod line a customer-doom,
humus to entire agricultural regions as well ON costsliffong Competitive business It's a whole am approach—with new
to non participating urban agendes.This is Out acceptable. riles,new players and.ew ho uses.
eivan imingfinn should hard,bed)the buyer and the taller Mim.,oloas wel no in on dus a.n of reldirsh.Through
witham hum an sawn bromandre instance;devespenew program and responsible
We want our member agencies to ban AD the supply theme,sec'm positioned ourselves to save
and mlialiffity Dreyer willing to pay for.Moropcilltan encesur- the public comment in the 219 century,Using a diversified
ages the chains that San Diego or any other member agency regional approach to long-term water rams es manage-
an establish without reducing the financial integrity of the man(,we've increased our reliability while nowntaming,water
water sysiew.Each member agency has the right to acquire quality and affordability.Managing 10 survive is simply not
attention waser supplies and to use MnmopomamY sygmen enough in this busincess.We raw manage to succeed.
...........................—-------...........
i
' ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND
NOTES TO THE C MB WING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TUNE 30. 1997
1. ORGANIZATION
Orange County Bankruptcy
On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (the "County") filed for protection under
Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy Code following significant losses in the
County's investment portfolio(the'Tool").
Plan of Adjustment
On May 15, 1996, the United States Bankruptcy Court, ("Bankruptcy Court") Central
District of California confirmed the County's Modified Second Amended Plan of
Adjustment (the 'Plan"). The Plan, among other things, created the Orange County
Litigation Fund (the "Litigation Fund"), appointed a representative (the"Representative")
to enforce, prosecute and collect upon the various claims asserted by the County against
third parties and directed the Representative to deposit and invest the monies contained in
the Litigation Fund pursuant to guidelines established by the Plan.
Litigation Fund Financing
On June 13, 1996, the County transferred to the Representative $50 million to establish
the Litigation Fund. The source of these funds was Recovery Certificates of Participation,
which the County issued in a public offering. The Certificates of Participation are
obligations of the County and are payable from the County General Fund.
Appointment. Compensation and Indemnification of the Representative
I
The Plan appointed Thomas W. Hayes as the Representative effective June 12, 1996. The
Plan provides for the Representative to receive reasonable compensation and
reimbursement of expenses from the Litigation Fund. In addition to this, the
Representative is to receive 1.5% of any litigation proceeds, as defined in the Plan, in
excess of$200 million collected, recovered or received by the Representative.
The Representative and the Representative's agents are to be indemnified by the Litigation
Fund from and against any and all claims that may be asserted against them in their
capacity as Representative and Representative's agents.
i
ORANGE COUNTY LTI'IGATION FUND
NOTES TO THE COMEIINM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DUNE X 1997
1. ORGANIZATION- (Continued)
purpose and Use of the Litigation Fund
The Litigation Fond is to be used by the Representative to enforce, prosecute and collect
upon Pool Related Claims, as defined in the Plan. Monies from the fund are to be used to
pay for the services and expenses of the attorneys, paralegals, computerized document
management services, accountants and expert witnesses engaged to assist in the
prosecution, enforcement and settlement of these clams.
Litigation Fund Trustee
The Representative has selected State Street California, Inc. to act as the Litigation Fund's
Trustee to hold investments made with monies contained in the Litigation Fund.
Investment Guidelines for the Litigation Fund
The Plan set forth investment guidelines for the Litigation Fund. The Litigation Fund can
invest in relatively safe investments which include United States Treasury Securities,
obligations of United States Government agencies, commercial paper, negotiable
certificates of deposits, repurchase agreements, banker's acceptances and money market
funds.
2. RELATED LAWSUITS
The County initiated and the Representative now has the authority to prosecute and
enforce, a number of lawsuits in an effort to recover on Pool Related Claims. A brief
description is as follows:
Merrill Lynch The County Sled an amended suit against Merrill Lynch &
Co., Inc.; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner& Smith, Inc.; Merrill
Lynch Government Securities, Inc.; Merrill Lynch Capital
Services, Inc.; Merrill Lynch Money Markets, Inc.
(collectively "Merrill") on October 25, 1995. Among other
things, the County alleged that Merrill breached its fiduciary
duty to the County and engaged in transactions with the
County by which the County incurred obligations that violated
statutory and constitutional limits. The County's damage
clean against Merrill is in excess of$2 billion.
6
ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND
NOTES TO THE COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RJNE 30, 1997
2. RELATED LAWSUITS - (Continued)
KPMGPeat Marwick The County filed an amended complaint against KPMG Peat
Marwick CTPMG') on December 20, 1995. Among other
things, the County alleged that KPMG did not adequately
perform its responsibilities as the County's auditor and failed
to give proper warnings to the County Board of Supervisors
that could have prevented the authorization of incremental
borrowings and would have resulted in the cessation of illegal
and speculative investments in the County's investment
portfolio. The County's damage claim against KPMG is in
excess of$2 billion.
LeBoeut Lamb, Greene The County filed an action against LeBoeg Lamb, Greene&
&MacRae MacRae("LeBoeuf') on June 11, 1996. Among other things,
the County alleged that LeBoeuf failed to adequately perform
its responsibilities as the County's attorneys and knew of the
extreme sensitivity of the County investment portfolio to
interest rate risk but failed to warn the County Board of
Supervisors. The County's damage claim against LeBoeuf is
approximately$900 million.
Rauscher Pierce Refsnes The County filed an action against Rauscher Pierce Refsnes
("Rauscher") on June 11, 1996. Among other things, the
County alleged that Rauscher, failed to adequately perform its
responsibilities as the County's investment advisor and failed
to warn the County Board of Supervisors of the OCIP's
excessive sensitivity to interest rate changes. The County's
damage claim against Rauscher is approximately$500 million.
Standard&Poor's The County Sled an amended complaint against Standard &
Poor's ("S&P"), an operating division of McGraw Ifill, Inc,
on April 8, 1997. Among other things, the County alleges
that S&P negligently advised the County that its indebtedness
should be highly rated and falsely assured the County that the
Treasurer's investment strategy was safe. The County's
damage claim against S&P is in excess of$500 million.
7
ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND
NOTES TO THE COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
R&E 30. 1997
2. RELATED LAWSUITS -(Continued)
Morgan Stanley The County Sled an action against Morgan Stanley
("Morgan") on June 11, 1996. Among other things, the
County alleged that Morgan engaged in transactions with the
County by which the County incurred obligations that violated
statutory and constitutional limits. Further, the County
alleges that Morgan violated the automatic stay in the
County's Chapter 9 case by liquidating certain collateral of
the County. The County's damage claim against Morgan is
for an amount to be determined at trial.
Student Loan Marketing The County Filed an amended complaint against the Student
Association Loan ("Sallie Mae")Marketing Association on December 23,
1996. Among other things, the County alleged that Sallie
Mae sold the County risky securities without adequate
disclosure in violation of the United States securities laws.
The County's damage claim against Sallie Mae is in excess of
$Sg million.
Fuji Securities The County filed an action against Fuji Securities, Inc.
("Fuji") on September 17, 1996. The County alleges that
Fuji, as one of the County's former brokers, facilitated the
investment scheme pursued by the former Treasurer by,
among other things, engaging in illegal reverse repurchase
transactions with the County in violation of California
Constitutional and Government Code provisions restricting
borrowing and investing activities by municipalities. Further,
the complaint alleges that Fuji aided and abetted the former
Treasurer's breach of fiduciary duty and that Fuji violated the
automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code by liquidating
certain collateral of the County. The County's damage claim
against Fuji is in excess of$120 million.
3
ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND
NOTES TO THE COMIlR4M FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DUNE 30, 1997
2, RELATED LAWSUITS - (Continued)
Other Broker-Dealer The County filed three suits against additional broker-dealers
Proceedings on December 5, 1996. In one complaint, the County asserted
clams against Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., Bear Stearns
Securities Corp., Cantor, Fitzgerald Securities Corp.,
Citibank, N.A., Citicorp Securities, Inc., Daiwa Securities
America, Inc., Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., Donaldson Lufkin
& Jenrette Securities Corp., DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc., CS
First Boston Corporation, First Boston Corp., Credit Suisse
Financial Products,Kidder, Peabody& Co., Lehman Brothers
International (Europe), Lehman Capital Corp., Lehman
Commercial Paper, Inc., Lehman Brothers, Inc., Nomura
Securities International, Inc., Paine Webber, Inc., Paine
Webber Real Estate Securities, Inc., Prudential Securities,
Inc., Sanwa Securities (USA) Co., LP., SBC Capital
Markets, Inc., and Smith Barney, Inc.
In a second complaint, the County asserted claims against BA
Securities, Inc. an affiliate of Bank of America. In a third
complaint, the County asserted claims against Paribas
Corporation.
These three complaints allege that these broker-dealers
facilitated the investment scheme pursued by the former
Treasurer by engaging in illegal reverse repurchase
transactions with the County and/or by selling to the County
certain securities in violation of California Constitutional and
Government Code provisions restricting borrowing and
investment activities by municipalities. The complaints also
allege that several of the broker-dealers violated provisions of
federal bankruptcy law when they liquidated and seized
certain collateral securities belonging to the County. The
complaints seek damages according to proof at trial.
9
ORANGE COUNTY LITIGATION FUND
NOTES TO THE COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30. 1997
2. RELATED LAWSUITS - (Continued)
Other Issuers of On December 5, 1996, the County Sled three suits against
Structured Notes entities that issued structured notes that were purchased by
the County. In the first complaint, the County asserted claims
against Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA").
In the second complaint, the County asserted claims against
the Federal Home Loan Banks CTELBs"). In the third
complaint, the County asserted claims against Federal Farm
Credit Banks ("FFCBs"). In each of the complaints, the
County alleged that in selling the structured notes to the
County, the defendants violated the California Corporations
Code and section 10(b) of the 1934 Federal Securities and
Exchange Act. The County further alleges that, in selling the
structured notes to the County, the defendants committed
Saud. The complaints seek damages according to proof at
trial.
Brown&Wood On December 5, 1996, the County Sled a suit against Brown
& Wood and Paul C. Pringle, individually and as
representative of the class of all partners in Brown&Wood at
any time between March 2, 1994 and December 6, 1994. The
complaint alleges breach of contract, professional negligence,
negligent misrepresentation and aiding and abetting a breach
of fiduciary duty. Brown & Wood was retained through
Leifer Capital to serve as Disclosure Counsel for each of the
County's 1994-1995 short-term borrowings.
The complaint alleges that Brown&Wood in the course of its
duties knew or should have known the financial condition of
the County and the OCIP and that it Sailed to adequately
disclose this information in the official statements that it
drafted on behalf of the County.
ro
Oran a County Council of Governments
December 11, 1997
John Collins
Joint Chairman
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728
Dear John:
On behalf of the Orange County Council of Governments(OCCOG), I wanted to let you know how
much we have appreciated being able to utilize the Sanitation District's meeting rooms to convene
several of the OCCOG Board of Directors meetings during 1997. CSDOC staff has been both
gracious in offering the meeting space and diligent to ensure its availability. Cymantha Atkinson and
Michelle Tuckman have been most helpful and accommodating in this regard. Additionally,the OCCOG
has benefitted from the knowledge and expertise offered by Don McIntyre during Executive
Management Committee meetings and by Kevin Hadden during Technical Advisory Committee
meetings.
We hope to build upon the considerable successes that have been achieved during the OCCOG's
inaugural year, and look forward to continued subregional and regional consensus-building with the
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County on issues of mutual concem.
Again, thank you for supporting the OCCOG.
Sincerely,
Laurann Cook
Chair, Orange County Council of Governments
Mayor, City of Fountain Valley
attachment: OCCOG General Information Packet
cc: Don McIntyre, General Manager
occocvmaaeuttm
Chies: Brta a Bonn Park a Conn Mao a Cypss a Dena Pont a Fountain Valley a Fulknon a Hunuvgmn Beech 6yioe V Heb.a Lo Palma a Laguna Bach
Logue Niguel a Lake Fowl a to Alamitos a Minion Vm.a Newport Beach a Pkcenua a Son Clemsme a San Juan Capunanoo Sens Mu a Seel Bench a Stummm
Tustin a Yl1a Park a Wamdo[or a Yorba Linda a Agencies: County Satustion Dinrics of Osage County a Eoo Omngn County Ware,Dlnuict a Et Tom Water Dourict
FoothillIE umT.Ponnunn Comb,Agency'hylne Ranch Weser Duuic gc County Water DootI, a San Joaquin Hill,Tmoportmon Condor Agency
600 W Santa Ana Blvd.,Suite 214,Santa Ana,CA 92701 a (714)972-0077 a (714)972-1B16 fax a OCCOG®aol.com
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Olt
ate ubject
Orange County Register R
FROM WASTEWATER
TO,,GROUNDWATER
By PAT eRExxAtt I ENVIRONMENT: Ofri- '1em keeping up with the de
The Orange County Register , +a. mend,"It's Anthony said Wednes-
CI8]f3 $400 M00il plan�day. ' got to come from
would refill the ecxm r someplace—or we've got to tell
n paper the proposal tf people to go away."
looks like a. sure v B WBter tR]I]e8. Adding treated waste water tothing: H drinking-water
Highly treated drinng-water supplies is noth-
waste water would be ing a 13-mile pipeline from Foun- ing new; many Orange County
O
allowed to seep into twin Valley to Anaheim and in. residents probably have sampled
the underground beds that hold 'stalling high-tech filtration sys. some without knowing it.
much of Orange County's future tems that '•can remove It flows into the Santa Ana Riv-
drinldng-water supplies. contaminants as small as indi-' er from treatment plants in the
It could keep water costs down, vidual molecules. inland Empire, for example, is
stave off water rationing during projections show the pophla- captured in settling basins and
droughts, boost supplies for the tion of north and central Orange percolates through soil into
county's rapidly growing popu- County, the area served by the ground water. '
lace and make better use of Orange County Water District, Treated waste water is inject-
waste water that now is pumped- - growing from 2 million to 3 mil- ed into ground water near the
out to sea. Bon by 2020. coast to keep sea water from in-
But there is one great un- But ground water —. which vading water supplies,and is lat-
known:how the public will react. makes up about 60 percent of the er pumped out for drinking.
Water officials this week began a county's water supply — dwin- ' What is new, however, is the
yearlong effort to introduce dles rapidly, said district direc- filtration system that the Orange
Orange County to the$400 million for Philip L. Anthony. ,- County Water District and the
plan, which would involve build- "There's a tremendous prob- pease see WATER Page 9
RECYCLING WASTE WATER '` '
(kd]e Cpwnwdioffidanw,m 1.ins pain,wine W,Qa inn �� rNeldwM
uMergmuM wate,7
uopliex poand,INnpWiigdvm w,urcam,Mmeetig .� '�. �P�In
imeavn9 demaw expened inmmng tlemd¢ is 1. -
e,ra,aeeodeuw,pe ab`
Ee
nrauw uMa�w mmt _ w `o" .n _ ._ve,teEmm,tenCmkage. =� Bo pertmt .�
Poxned mr aiWargeE inn
r na0.cwaprdeak3
axM1`" \.pfine:as grlwv vt
®,.a"Bpembyel.m�er '-S E'�'mmme:'vtm9�
RAIN
;nd g.. �.•famr.o. -
REVERSE WHAT? I�apprr ga. - }1a it h
Rere's ntwreene osmosis works � 1sarMittel(li Ycdrs f
7.iveaunred 2lmpuritles n1Ya,Owrtw"1�ttlyeut
rwne water pumped gipped. pexnm mewan ode. I
oppugn membwm. memMn.
tuned wa�� t
3.PsnifiM wan
�r queened imp moe
SIZE COMPARISON
FRINV®RMn,waxr malralle pmanrm Ind,Ixnriuni
1 were mnveab 011VZeTmde wok EetM tiv
\_�` - f/ pfamtIXpader_ Wbmrmew
ra"wr'wm°ingeomn
GE00.GE NRNEYRM Oxeye roomy Fe9mer
WATER: Current supply won't be sufficient
mom 1
Orange Cowry Sanitation Dis- ed water would be piped along said the proposal stands like a
tricts envision. the Seam Ana River to Anaheim, good idea.as long as the water is
The Sanitation Districts'plan[ where it would take about a year carefully filtered and allowed to
in Fountain Valley already to settle from holding ponds into pemolate into the ground water.
Mats water flowing in through deep aquders. rather than being piped in or in-
the sewer system until it is dear. Sand and sod would provide jetted.
odorless and almost as tree of yet another.natural filter.and to Bob Caustin, director of De-
bacteria as drinking water. It is some cases the water would be fend the Bay, led the fight
.ad primarily for irrigation and seated with chlorine as it was
landscaping, nor for drinking. pumped out for drinking. channagainst an terli<r proposal to
By 2020, after being built in Orange Cowry could be among Upper Newport
waste the liver nto
stages,the new system would di- the first to use such a complex Upper Newport Bay; the Irvine
vein about IW,M acre-feet of filtration system,although other Ranch Water Distract atte
waste water per year into two communities throughout the studio no longer plans[o attempt
highly sensitive filters. (One state and nation have been ustng `be['
acre-foot is enough to supply two treated waste water to recharge But Cawtin said the❑eamtent
families of four with water far a gmwd-water supplies for years plan sketched out by the Orange
One filter — a mlcrofilter — County and PeAax Cho ry,Va.. �y Water District would be
unlikely at JeoPardtre public
would remove bacteria,some vi. according to rosesroh done by health.
roses and larger molecules. A the Orange Cowry Water Dis- "H they twat it to the level
second system—reverse osmo- tract. they're speaking of,it would be a
sis—would remove smaller mol. H the new system is installed, wonderful thing,"Caustin said.
ecales.such as salts,and any re- some surplus water may be public hearings will be held
awma g bacteria or viruses. available during emergencies and written responses to the pro
Such a system is needed in an for south county water districts. posal will be sough[, water offi.
because of the size variations which have virtually no ground cials said.The fast hearings will
among contaminants. water and import almost their be Jan. 13.one at 3:30 p.m. and
"If a water molecule were the entire water supply. Snow said. one at 7 p.m., to the district's
slzeofatemusball.aviroswould One local dean-water activist board room in Fountain Valley.
be the size of a semi;'said Tama
S.Snow,a senior engineer at the
Orange Cowry Water District.
"A bacterium would be the size
of the Luxor Hotel in Las Vegas."
After being filtered, the treat-
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Paper Section Page # Date Subject
F=L -
s Times / 12 1 P ��
-a 1
Proposal Would WATER Reclamation Plan
Conthmed from III on golf courses and coursed
Make Waste Water
the Orange County Water Dtshict =Ugghatr conditioning systems in
Fit for Drinking t which u propos to the Districts
erith Orange Co of drin has nwater in
the County Sanitation D1sWem of a source of d. Similar
water In
Orange County. Orange County. Slmilaz projects,
0amg micro-nitration and re- however, in Los Angeles County
■ Resources: Officials say verse osmosis technology,the new and Fairfax County,Va.,have been
plant would process waste water deemed highly successful.
$40D-mi]lion project is nee"to that the sanitation district now Currently, the orange County
ensure rising demand Can be met Pumps into the ocean.Once it Was Water District, which is the sole
treated at the Proposed plant, at agency responsible for managing
the water dtnrict's current head- Orange County's ground-water
By HOPEHAMASHIGE quarters In Fountain Valley, the basin, replenishes the basin with
SPECIAL to WE TIMES water would be sent through 13 water imported from the Colorado
FOUNTAIN VALLEY—A plan unveiled mile of pipeline along the Sanm River and with water it traps in the
Wednesday would convert billions of got- Ana Riverbed m Anaheim.There it Santa Ana River.
lone of waste water to drinking water each would be released into a aeries of Water district board members
existing ponds that act as a natural said the need for new water
year to meet growing demand and protect
Orange County in the event of mayor water filler and wouldseep into the sources has become urgent because
drought ground-water basin below, which Southern California might not he
unty'e two largest supplies water for central and able to rely on a steady supply
Officials of Orange Co
water and sanitation undisty's said the northern Orange County. from the Colorado River or the
proposed 5400-mimon project would re- The plant would produce 100,000 Sacramento Bay Delta In the fu-
plenioed $40eCounty'sroject ground-water re- acmfeet of water each year,nearly true.
sin and creme an important new source of enpugh to supply the 1 million new California consistently has taken
residents who are expected to more than its allotted share from
water for Orange County as the threat of move Into north and central the Colorado River. But several
severe shortages looms over Southern Orange County by 3030. states, including Arizona, Nevada,
California I Anthony said the board is pre- Colorado and Utah,are protesting
"We need more water, and we have pared for some resistance from the that practice because they also
exhausted many alternatives to get more public, because many people are need the water.
water."said Philip L Anthony,dlrectar of put off by the idea of drinking Also, Concerns over enviren-
Plem see WATER,115 treated waste water. 4 mental damage in the SacramentoSouthern
"Shoe people have ec emotional Bay Delta has [arced Southern
reaction against it, because they hoped
m take less water than
think they are drinking sewer 6oThefor o agencies
s are.
water,"he said. The two nce then are exploring
lo tam.Ism year the Irvine Ranch ways m finance the project,includ-
Water District scrapped plans to Ing applying far grants and ailing
send reclaimed water through the bonds.
Upper Newport Bay,because envi- Tema Snow, an engineer with
romnentalists and residents feared the water district,said the cost of
the treated sewage water would the project probably would not
damage the environment affect water rates because there
But water district officials said would be significant savings from
Wednesday that the techniques u®ng recycled rather than im-
they plan in employ would Create ported water to replenish the basin.'
water so mean It would rival the The first in a series of public
taste and quality of bottled drink- hearings an the proposal will be
ingwater.. held Jan.13 from 3:30 to 5 p.m.and
"It is very high quality water," from 7 m &.30 p.m. at the Orange
Anthonysaid County Water District 10500 Ellis
Reclaimed water has been used Ave.in Fountain Valley.
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
L � =j I it Y/97 1 JQbo- aL
Project calls for treated waste water
0 public meetings will Sanitation Districts of Orange to meet the demand. approved,the system could pro-
County—both Fountain VaOey- Additionally,this system duce up to 100,000 acre feet of
be held Jan. 13 to dis- based agencies that manage would reduce the county's water annually.The current
cuss the multimillion- water resources dependence on demand for water is 500,000 acre
—will hold two r-------------I----------1. water pur- feet per yea.
roosa dollar l. public informs- i F.Y.I. i chased from 'Everyone will benefit from
proposal. lion sessions on ' ' the Colorado
Jan. 13 at the i 9 WHAT.Public meetings for i fiver and the this reliable source of water
By Kathleen Haney,Independent water District to i the Groundwater State Water said Tama Snow,senior engineer
CUSCUae the ' Replenishment System. ' Project and al the Water District. "The tech-
i p r nology used will be the same as
FOIRVTAPI VALLEY— Groundwater ' 4 WHEN:ten. 13 r would bet
t r that of bottle water companies.'
rote
Orange County's thirst for a retias
- Replenishment i +p TIME:3:30 to 5 p.m.and 7 i such asp Slated to possibly begin in
able supply of water could be System project. i to 9:30 p.m. i 1999,project construction will
quenched for the next century if We've i .g WHERE:The Orange 1 Fountain
if consist of a 13-mile pipeline built
a proposed water replenishment looked at a lot i county Water District, 10500 i Huntln on m the Santa Ana River right-of.
system is approved in 1999: of possibilities, i Ellis Ave,Fountain Valley. i Beach, way between Fountain Valley
The program would take and this is one ,g CALL 378-3200 ' and Anaheim,with new injection
treated waste water currently of the besh" r __� Anaheim,
discharged into the ocean and said Ph �'-"""----""'--- Garden Grove, wells and a new treatment plant
through advanced purification Anthony,director of the County Orange and installed at either the Orange
methods make it available for Water District.He added that Santa Ana from future droughts. County Water District or the
everyday uses—including water could become a precious Anthony said a mix of local, County Sanitation District of
drinking,cooking and balKing. commodity as Orange County's state and federal funding is Orange County.Construction
The Orange County Water population increases,so a safe, being looked at to hind the$300 won't affect local streets,said
District and the County reliable water supply is needed to$400 million project.B Anthony.
VWEIW 1WC 9 WRAP-UP
Water Experts: Future Improvements
Hinge on Using Watershed Approach
Future versions of the Clean Water Act(CWA)will have to Paul Helmke,mayor of Fort Wayne,Ind.,and president of the
encourage water quality improvements"watershedby-wa US. Conference of Mayors, agreed with Cook's notion of gov-
tershed," according to Robert Perciasepe, assistant ad- comment agencies,businesses,and nonprofit organizations work-
ministrator for water at the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency ing together and advocated more public private partnerships.
(EPA)."It's more like guerrilla warfare than the saturation bomb- While discussing the challenges local government officials and
ing of the last 25 years." their communities face,Helmke said the need for revenues and ex-
To bring about positive change, Perciasepe recommended paraded investments is crucial because 91%of the costs assocl-
thal ated with clean water standards are currently paid by mmmu-
• clean water tools of the past 25 years he reevaluated because Cities.
many have"maxed out"and that new ones be developed; "We]individual communities]need as much control as pos-
• a"holistic"approach to individual watershed health,including sible at the local level to decide what is best for each communi-
an increased focus on nonpoint source pollution,be taken;and ty,"Helmke said,citing problems many cities have with waste- j
• more interaction among national,state,and local governments water during heavy rains."We want to make sure we don't just
be used to salve localized problems.
Perciasepe, the first of seven Tr
panelists who spoke at the"National
Issues" session, and other panelt; �
speakers focused on watersheds and ,
nonpoint source pollution—areas
critical to achieving high water qual-
ity throughout the United States.
The first of three panelists who _
provided a nongovernmental per-
spective.Ken Kirk executive director
of the Association of Metropolitan
Sewerage Agencies, agreed with
_-
Perciasepe that a watershed ap-
proach is needed. CWA's total its-
regard for nonpoint source and wet
weather pollution issues needs to
be addressed,he said,recommend-
ingthedevelopmentofanafgres- RnPNHRs air Ina,riialnt source and wet weatker polufion and some mallwd of financing are heeded to calgnueb
knpmre wehrawNy.
sive control program and the cre-
ation of some method of financing water quality improvement have fishable,swimmable rivers while we have basements full of
needs. sewage,"he added.
Michael Cook, director of the EPA Office of Wastewater Randolph Wood,director of Nebraska Department ofEnviron-
Management.agreed that some method of financing is needed be- mental Quality,recommended an approach similar to total quaF
cause"the in-place,current value of sewers in the United States try management for solving problems in which"those who know
is$2.3 billion"and the billions of dollars required for upkeep of the most about the problem or situation develop the solution."
this system are unavailable. Both Jim Porterfield,technical specialist for water resources
Beyond funding problems,some environmental problems in- issues at the American Farm Bureau Federation, and Robert
volving point-source discharges from mining, animal feeding, Reich,principal consultant of environmental safety and process
and collection systems still exist, Cook said,adding that these engineering at DuPont Co.In Wilmington,Del.,expressed concern
types of point sources need some sort of National Pollutant about CWA enforcement.Porterfield said the future CWA could
Discharge Elimination System regulation. achieve water quality improvements in agriculture through "jail,
Cook recommended"cooperative programs with other[gov- large fines,and permits,or technology and incentives"PorteKeld
eminent and nongovemment]agencies at the federal,state,and, said he hopes technology and incentives prevail.Reich,noting
if possible, local level" to solve nonpoint source problems. that CWA has had a tendency to "hone-in on Industry," said
Voluntary measures also are needed,he said, because a com- everyone plays a role in water quality problems so a future CWA
prehensive set of regulations covering all local problems will should be Rexibile and locus on incentives,not enforcement.
never exist. —Tam Hun, WE&T
40 WATER ENVIRONMENT a TECHNOLOGY
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # D to Subject
Los Angeles Times Q 2
UMNE
Water District Wins
Environmental Award
- The Ae of California Wales
Agencies has awarded the Irvine
Aanch Water District its Theo-
dore Roosevelt Environmental .}
Award r:..r ^r•:.
Given Yearly in three project
budget categories,'the awards
recognize natural resources
management programs that en- .
hence or protect the environ-
ment while meeting public
needs. '.. ;,. .
In the $25,000-or-less cat- +
egary, the Irvine Reach Water ,
District was honored for its nura- {
cry project. ..
The project uses recycled wa-
ter and state-of-the-art technof- 'i
ogy to grow abode base that will
be planted locally. .'. .-"r "--
The other two agencies hon-
ored this year were the Castale,
• Lake Water Agency, in the
$25,000-m-S10D,0DD budget mt. .,
egary;and the Fresmi Metropoll• C
in Flood Control District,in the
mare-than-$100,000 category.
The association is a statewide '.
organization with 440 members, �
—LLSA ADDISON ,
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Sefilion Page # Date Subject
Orange County Register � 1214 711
San Diego near agreement
to keep its water flowing
RESOURCES: A pact aqueduct system completed in cent of its 2.7 million people,he
would end near) two 1947 and paid off two years ago. said.
y Johnson officially signed it over By 2015, the population is ex-
years of feuding he- 10 MWD and the San Diego an. petted to be 3.8 million.
tween the water all- thority. Thanks to conservation and
San Diego got the 71-mile pipe- new reservoirs, Southern Cali-
thority and the Metro- line across Riverside County fornia water supplies are fairly
politan Water District. from the Colorado River aque- assured for the next 20 years,
duct because the Navy, busy said John V. Foley,MWD chair-
By CARRYGERBER with World War 11,needed water man.
The Assodated Press for its base here. And customer rates shouldn't
Some people wondered if the rise more than 2 Percent a year
SAN DIECO — Water Some
would get finished be- for the next decade, he predict-
wheelers and dealers, celebrat- cause President Franklin D. ed.
ing SO years of the aqueduct that Roosevelt used his special war Rates have been a major sock.
nourished the city's postwar powers to authorize it, and the ing point in the water-transfer
boom, said Wednesday that an war ended before construction argument. San Diego figures a
agreement was near to keep wa- did,recalled Linden R.Burrell,a surcharge of about$60 per acre-
ter Rowing for decades to come. Navy engineer who worked on foot is fair,while the MWD wants
The pact would end nearly two the system. to charge its client about$260 for
years of feuding between San "Without it, we wouldn't be use of the facilities.
Diego's water authority and here,"mid Stephen P.Cushman, An acre-foot is enough water
Southern California's giant Met. chairman of the Greater San Die- for one or two families a year.
ropolitan Water District over dr go Chamber of Commerce. He The "surplus" water is avail-
liveries from the Colorado River. pointed to a booming complex of able from new conservation
An announcement on "wheel- high-tech industries and steady measures on farms near the Col-
ing," or transferring the water, population growth. orado. There are a tangle of is-
could come as early as next week The area's 10 inches of rain a sues still to be resolved,Williams
after meetings of the organizes- year would suffice for just 10 per- cautioned.
tions'boards,said Maureen Sta-
pleton, general manager of the
San Diego Water Authority.
That would not be too soon for
federal authorities and Califor-
nia's neighbors.Arizona and orb.
er sates along the Colorado have
been demanding that California
stop taking more than its share
from the river.
"If California can't tie its loose
ends together, It's hard to even
think about stable relationships
with other states," said Howard
S.WBliamsol'Vista,a directorof 1
the 'an
Diego authority."1 think
we're seeing some good changes,
some very positive things."
The water bosses joined engi-
neering old-timers and Robert .
W. Johnson of Boulder City,
Nev.,director of the lower Colo-
rado for the U.S. Bureau of Rec-
lamation, at a ceremony beside
San Vicente Reservoir, 20 miles
northwest of the city.
The lake is the terminus of an
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Los Angeles Times 102611
WATER: Little District Won't Go
Tiny Water District Conti noed from at reached on finding a way to settle the
will be held In six months. dlspute
It was a victory for ny the city
Refuses to Pull Plug lAwsonboard amdiree be o�fardatrict aYe wooduld like-Chles,said Jim While �rbtproheuwaaltens does not eetep"�ct,he
■Utilities:Trl�th'3'wins a
came erned. . . It's business as usual;' he LkFCO„ to
appeal of panel's Bald. He believes the commission Intends to
move to hill it and let San Clemente take Over. Could supported Tri-Galles' argument hold more meetings to decide whether to
Mat In the conlrlllsoon's attempt to have take a different approach to dissolving We
San Clemente take over Tri-Cities, We district or discuss whether Its action
By DAVIDREYFS commission failed to follow the law and againstTri-Cities and other pending merg-
TIMM sravr Wanes protect $35 million in meta and $2.5
edition In reserves held by Tri-Cures, areWekn could e that
SANtodle. .NTFtA any South County warm dlMM according la "We knew that wehevc eta months anal
refmvingju. Lawson. - a fug hearing Is held
Serving Jm170,000 customers. the Ttf-(.Yam Municipal Gourd cured "By 8 transferring Td-Cities' on the temporary
Water District has fought an uphill battle against the local transferring TBy , Y g . Injunction;.' said
Agency Formation Commiedon, which has targeted the Gould
corporate corporate powers to San Parnma
district Aug unnecessary the
alsalofgover to powers to San We- Clemente in a proceeding The commission's '
Leal August, the coy of an acted to dissolve the mente In a proceed. The
marked the
distinct and allow the city of San Clemente m take over Its ing which Is not a Which Is not a conselldatlonv first time that a
operstlon. consolidation, not not the creation of a subsidiary wholesale water
The district's efforts to change the commission'smind the creation of a agency was tar-
faaed. subsidiary district district nor a merger,the gated for dissolution
So the district went to court, end last week Superior nor a merger, the commission acted outside of and Its furelluns
Court Commissioner F. Latimer Gould agreed with Tri- commission acted Its legislative authorization.' city,Clem Calm' m arguent and invalidated the commLaUon's decision outside of Its legie-
this rose. Sa
when he Issued a preliminary Injunction halting the lative authorization F.IATWBI aptaD mente. About le
district's dlssolutlun. - In fashioning an Im- Commissioner other mergers and
A hearing on whether to make the b*mcann permanent proper'hybrld'pro- proposed dissolu-
Flom m WATM ES reduce." none are pending
In addition,Gould Bald, We commisslun before thecommLvslon.
failed to handle properly cox revenue Tri-Cities Is fighting the takeover by,
exchanges.He also faulted the commission San Clemente,arguing that a municipality,
for not properly Informing San Diego shouldn't have control over a regional
County of Its action concerning Tri-Cities, water wholesaler.Instead,the 37-year-old
whose service area Includes the San Ono- district has asked that It be allowed to-
fre Nuclear Generating Station and elate merge with the Municipal Water District of
parks In north San Diego County. Orange County.
Michael W.Parneas,city manager of San What effect the corm elm ones a decision
Clemente, which was a defendant In TH. could have on the com ndmilon'a other
Clues lawoult, said that a meeting was , merger attempts lent clear.The comeals-
held after Could's ruling with represents. slon's staff could not be reached for
lives from county government, the com. comment bemuse the agency was closed'
mission and city. But no decision was for the holiday.
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Orange County Register A p 2J
Where shall we put
all the animal waste?
The staggering amount of an-
imal waste produced on Amen.
can farms often pollutes water,
and the risk fs growing as more
large-scale UBlfaock operations
take hold,according to a new
U.S. Senate study.
The study found that the
amount of animal manure pro-
duced in the United States is
130 times greater than the
amount of human waste,and
that there are no national stan-
dards for dealing with the ani-
mal waste.
For example, a single SO,OOD-
acre hog farm being built in _
Utah could potentially put out
more waste than the city of Los
Angeles,the study said.
— From Register next Services
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page# Date Subject
Orange County Register
Water bonds ro osed
p p
ENVIRONMENT: Dem- fornia's water and park infra Some lawmakers are skepti- the county would be eligible to
structure, in his last year as the cal, however, that the Legisla- receive tens of millions of dollars
Gerais like Wilson's in- state's chief executive, are his ture will be willing to place so for beach and coastal improve-
terest, but aren't sure most aggressive efforts to ad- many bond measures before vot. ments as well as Rood control
dress environmental concerns. ers. projects.Several Orange County
voters will approve of Wilson administration officials "If voters are asked togoto the beaches are among the most
too much borrowing. are still trying to decide whether well too often,there's some pmb- heavily used state parks.
the bonds should go before voters ability they all might go down to The water bonds would devote
By MARK KATCHES in June or November. First the defeat," said state Sen. John about war million for Rood con-
The Orange County Reghter• .Proposals must pass in the De- Lewis, R-Orange. a ol,t$5 million for water dcon.
macro[-controlled Legislature. Aeliv-
ssembly Speaker Pro Tempo- cry and $260 million for water
SACRAMENTO — Gov. Pete It is the latest bond initiative re Sheila Kuehl,D-Santa Monica, quality statewide.
Wilson plans to unveil$2.1 billion from Wilson, who is ending his said she lhfnks the[ the Legisla-
in bond proposals in his new bud- tenure with a flurry of plans to tore will have to at
priorities The environment and park
get to pay for water delivery and pay for infrastructure improve- and that not all the me asum"ill land proposal includes$100 mil.
an improved environment. ments.The governor already has make it to the ballot. lion to help complete acquisition
Documents released Monday unveiled an $e billion yroposal "Do you know what it means to of the state's 1,100-mile coastal
show that the governor plans to for school construction bonds to float so many bonds now?" trail, $310 million for improve.
ask the Legislature to let voters be spent over six years,and he is Kuehl said. "It means.you won't ments at the state's 264 parks,
consider $1.3 billion measure to expected to push separate bonds have to worry about being $9S million for wetland acquisi-
pay for flood control and water- for prison construction. around to pay them off." tions and $130 million to protect
conservation, water-recycling Wilson officials believe voters, Assembly Democrats today 7,S00 acres of old-growth red-
and water-quality Improve- who have rejected most bond is- Plan to release a 50-page report woods in Northern California.
ments. sues this decade, will be more on their own coastal initiative
Wilson, who will deliver his receptive now that the economy that calla for $700 million in The water bond second
or ith Is
eighth State of the State speech is robust. bonds for beach and ocean im- considered the second of three
Wednesday followed by his Wilson's latest proposals were provements.The report does not state needed to ensure and el ade-
1998-99 fiscal year budget propos- greeted warmly by Democrats list specific Orange County pro- sys em :aatheustalte's papule ion
al Friday,also wants$80o million and environmentalists. jects. continues to swell. Voters sp-
in a separate bond measure de. "This is certainly the gover- Wilson also was light on details proved 5s t million ih 19%.
voted to coastal and wildlife pro- nor's most ambitious effort," about Orange County projects he
tection and improvements to the said state Sen. Jim Costa, wants to finance. But state voters have not ap-
state park system. D-Fresno. "1'm pleased to see But that doesn't mean the proved bonds to pay for park im-
Wilson's plans to shore up Cell- him join the fray." - county would be left out. In fact„ provements since 1988.
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Los Angeles Times 2-
COSTA MESA
2 Panels Will Study
Water District Issue
With the threat of consolida-
tion still looming, the board of
the Mesa Consolidated Water
District recently established two
committees to study the issue.
Diana Leach, the district's as-
sistant general manager,said the
board hopes to be prepared m the
event it must be merged with
another agency.
A recent consolidation study
done for South County special
districts, as well as recent state
legislation encouraging consoli-
dations, suggested that Mesa be
merged with Irvine Ranch Water
District
One committee will meet
regularly with Irvine Ranch
hoard members and the general
manager,Ron Young. The other
will meet with members of the
Costs Mean City Council to keep
them informed of developments.
Leach emphasized there is not
a proposal to merge the two
water agencies. But if there is
movement in that direction, the
board wants to be prepared.
"I think the board wants to
begin studying all the alterna-
tives,"she said.
—HOPE HAMASHICE
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject_
Los Angeles Times I II10/98 Ly/,, &
Safe Use
of Biosolids
•Re your Dee 17 editorial,"What's
m 'Organic Food'? Still Plenty of
Controversy":
Your edilorial implied[he public
would be asd if sewage sludge use
were prohibited from the definition
of "organic." You did not mention
the inclusion of raw, unprocessed
animal manures m the organic pro-
duction of fruits and vegetables.
Animal manures are high in soluble
nutrients that could contaminate
the ground water if not properly
applied and managed Outbreaks of
cryptoeporidium in Mllwaukee and
pfiestena on the East Coast were
related to animal manures.Despite
these risks and the fact that the
rule precludes any practice that
could contaminate water by
nitrates and bacteria, raw animal
manures are permitted.
On the other hand, biosolids
(treated sewage sludge)Is a higghly
regulated material. Biosolids
applied to agricultural land for the
production of crops for human con-
sumption "presents negligible risk
to the consumer" affording to the
National Academy of Sciences'
National Research Council. You
claim Its use in any kind of agri-
culture is questionable, given the
tmdc industrial waste it often con.
tams,including cadmium and lead"
Between 1980 and 1991 Lee Ange-
les reduced the level of cadmium
and lead discharged to its sewage
system by 93% and 87%, respec-
tively.Farmers who have used the
city's blosolids report increased
yields and reduced irrigation and
herbicide needs.
ELLEN STEIN,President
LA.Board of Public Works
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Orange County Register I �,,
� a
MARSH ON THE MEN®
ENVIRONMENT: An _A vg xj, six-month project to re-create
BIRDLAND / what was a nourishing marsh a
Open house will Show- Restoration of a freshwater marsh In heine is LIRVRE� what w ago.
nearly complete and trails will be open to the I F'.h S •fj., cDry,entury
rectangular
ponds
case a restored bird publicbeginningSunday f �' plagued by foreign vegetaion
sanctuary that's been A variety of bids can be pROIECr SIZE' now sparkle with fresh water for
'although
there now,
10 years in the making. although panda are P t nesting shorebirda.
Hill Wrgety barter plr 1/ Q ✓ - Thousands of Young willow,
By NANCY TUNA of vegetation 'klirvlm rl i(I g '.• w,� a{ n sycamore and cottonwood trees
The Orange County Register I In. 'h i 6 — native to Southern California
r! ales — will eventually become a
From Irvine f Nb'f a mltlgNlan r r r ij > sprawling.urban forest.
dreds of black- �,�( nil ern 0 f e4l' A series of pedestrian fruits
ck still birds wad A ( and observation decks has also
ed on a mud net at it toe°'r"nr<h vs� been built for bird-watchers and
Himah,e San Joaquin pro~Rom nature lovors.
1 E, a..:prompting a .I Protect supporters say They al-
=C 1 pt - ready see a difference.
face. lz grin an Peer Swans a / y _ f, elwn water orap i
face. Sj Controlled oofAsa'av) anon area "It's loaded with birds, and
"It's working,"mid Swan,the ,r mil# �� ens is when the vegetation comes In,
unofficial rather of a $6 million } = ', Least eill vlreo its going to be fantastic," said
marsh-restoration project."And ` t One of the native birds Beverly Spring,a volunteer coor-
when this Is all planted and the Stawtu� f ( u4 that it is hoped will dinatar for the Orange County
Dods ore arched over with -.o make Its home around chapter of the Sea and Sage Ab-
rees, this is going to be knock i f the naw'Ponds, dubon Society.
your
neat." a t The 170-acre project was a
Swan, a director of the Irvine- j ' ` joint effort between the district
-�s r and former landowner, the Ir.
Ranch Water Uislric4 can't help i,�l 1
but smile. Qom. \ vine Co.
'!`•;; 1y - -ter vet_"-- Swan has overseen the project
,.He has nurtured a 10.year el- ��" 1 since restoration talks began a
fort to revive the largest fresh-
water wetland it, Southern Call. snhiin berm topmteo �i.i fiE decade ago,when the Irvine Co.
forma. The district will host an bib born uaaknot se first proposed building a I.00o,
open house Sunday toshowcasea Sowo.very Ammo WdtnpenM %e Diane County Register please we MARSH page
+�f«
\ 21
:
! � .
\ 2 t
MARSH: Wetlands restored
FROM t
unit apartment complex near the HOW TO TOUR MARSH
marsh's duck ponds. The San Joaquin Marsh open
After years of negotiating, the house will be from noon to 3
water district bought 3DD acres of p.m.Sun day.The Orange
the SWacre wetland from the Ir- C chapter of the Sea and
vine Co.for$18 millionin Decem- County D
ber 1995, Swan said. Sage Audubon Society will
The University of California, provide guided tours.
Irvine, owns the remaining 200 An early-bird walk Is at 9
acres. a.m. .
The.deal gave the Irvine Co. Visitors are encouraged to
habitat mitigation credits for bring binoculars to view doz-
restoration of the marsh. The em of bird species,including
credits can be used to make up mallards,northern pintails,
for the removal of other wetland American coots,ruddy ducks
habitat In the company s future and red-shouldered and red-
developments, including the tailed hawks.
Bonita Canyon project at the Scopes will be available for
Newport Beach-Irvine border, bird-watching.
said Sat Tamaribuchi,vice presi- The marsh is bordered by
dent of environmental affairs. Campus,Michelson and
By June, funds were assem- Carlson drives and the San
.bled to begin the project, which Diego Creek,near the Univer-
included: sity of California.Irvine.Vlsi-
►Reconfiguring -100 acres of tors can enter the bird
waterfowl ponds to attract nest- , ton can enter
y'at r the
Michelson
Ing of migratory birds and di. '.Drive ar Irvine.
verting creek water so it Rows Visitors i e encouraged,but
through the marsh Instead of 9
around it. not required,to make reserva-
- ►Planting about 38 acres oP -tions by calling(114)453-SSDD.
native trees Inside and adjacent
to the ponds.
►Restoring about 44 acres of
habitat along Michelson and
Carlson drives by clearing out
non-native vegetation such as
wild mustard weed. Sycamore,
willow and cottonwood trees
were planted instead.
►Creating an 8-foot buffer
zone along Campus Drive to de-
crease light and noise from near-
by commercial and housing de-
velopments. A smaller berm is
planned for Michelson and Carl-
son drives.
Orange County Sanitation Districts Od7't-
Newspaper Clippings
Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject
Los Angeles Times fl I L) II4
:MWD Stand on Aqueduct Fees Is Rejected
that MWtlow
■ Courts: A judge backs groups.
The ruling could lead to a wide- only be charge theuactual cost of 'ahnwltation contained" In the 1986
;smaller agencies that want open market in which water-rich transporting water through the MWD officials, stunned by the
to pay less to transport agricultural and rural agencies sell aqueduct—not, for example, in- sweep of thejudges ruling,said they
the resource directly to more cluding the cost of bringing State will not decide whether to appeal
;their Colorado River water populous regions by using the 242- Water Project water from North- until a study can be conducted on
:for sale toother roU mile aqueduct built in the1930s. ern California. the decislon's economic impacc
groups. The MWD,which supplies water Kay sided against the MWD and Of particular Interest will be
to 16 million people in six Southern with the opponents'concept of the whether the prospect of curtailed
By TONY PERRY California counties, has asserted charges. revenues will hurt the huge
•TIMM[lair WRITER that under a state law encouraging The MWD had argued that let- agency's ability to sell bonds for
In a blow to the historic domi- water transfers It could include In ting some groups buy water from large projects.
nance of the Metropolitan Water Itscharge for using the aqueduct a the Colorado River without paying Paul Cunningham, MWD advisor
District of Southern California over portion of the overall cost of main- their share of the regional system's and lawyer,said the ruling's effect
raining its complex water delivery full cost was unfair to other agen- "on water transfer policies could be
regional water matters. a judge system. ties and was akin to allowing some very substantial"and lead to other
-Tuesday rejected the mega- Anticipating that the age of homeowners to pay only for the agencies seeking private purchase
;agency's concept of what Is fair transfers is rapidly approaching, cop patrolling their block and not deals using the MWD's facilities.
•compensation for use of Its Colo- the MWD brought the lawsuit for the overall police department. Kay's decision is particularly good
redo River Aqueduct. seeking validation of Its views. Kay sympathized with that view new for the Quechan and Cheme-
The decision by San Francisco But other agencies opposed the but Bald his role was to decide what huevl tribes along the Colorado.
Superior Court Judge Laurence suit, arguing that the MWD was lawmakers had in mind In passing Both have allotments of the
•Kay represented a victory over the trying to maintain its hegemony the 1966 law encouraging water river's water that they would like
MWD by the San Diego County over Colorado River water by transfers and not whether the to sell to agencies along the coast
Water Authority,the Imperial lrcl- pushing the cost of using the legislation was equitable. to help the tribes avoid dependence
gallon District,two Native Amerl- aqueduct so high that transfers "While [the MWD position)may on casino gambling, government
can tribes along the Colorado River would be uneconomical. not be unreasonable," Kay ruled, subsidies and the vagaries of desert
•and a coalition of environmental The opposing lawyers argued "It Is not In conformance with the agriculture.
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
DECEMBER 17, 1997
itICTS OFp99y
yQ � o0
z
z �
� a
plF�/NC�7 � �Ppt�
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
12/17/97
Page 2 of 11
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on December 17, 1997, at 7:30
p.m., in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation
the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT X Pat McGuigan, Chair Thomas E. Lutz
NO. 1 X James M. Fe an Chair pro tem Arthur Perry
X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz
A Thomas R. Saltarelli I Jim Potts
X I Todd Spitzer William G.Steiner
DISTRICT X Norman Z. Eckenrode Chair Michael L. Maertzweiler
NO.2 X Mark A. Murphy,Chair pro tem Joanne Coontz
X Steve Anderson John Holmbe
X Don Bankhead Chris Norb
X Bruce A. Broadwater Mark Le es
X John Collins James Petrikin
X Barry Denes Bob Bell
A Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff
X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
X Todd S itzer Wlliam G.Steiner
X Hank Wedae Mark Schwing
X I Bob Zemel Tom Dal
DISTRICT X Margie L. Rice Chair James V. Evans
NO. 3 X Eva Miner-Bradford Chair pro tern Paul F.Walker
X Steve Anderson John Holmberg
X Don Bankhead Chris Norb
X George Brown Gwen Forsythe
Mary Ann Jones X Tim Keenan
A Brian Donahue Harry M.Dotson
A Burnie Dunlap Marty Slmonoff
X Mark Le es Bruce A. Broadwater
X Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller
X Pat MoGui an Thomas E. Lutz
X Todd Spitzer William G. Steiner
X Dave Sullivan I Tom Hannan
X Charles E. Sylvia I Alice B. Jempsa
X Bob Zemel I Tom Dal
DISTRICT X Jan Debay, Chair John E. Noyes
NO.ti 1 John E. Noyes,Chair pro tem X Jan Deba
X Wiliam G.Steiner I Todd Spitzer
DISTRICT X James M. Fe an Chair Arthur Perry
NO.6 X William G.Steiner Chair pro tem Todd Spitzer
X I Jan Debay I I John E. Noyes
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
12/17/97
Page 3 of 11
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT A Thomas R. SaMarelli Chair I Jim Potts
NO. 7 X Christina Shea Chair pro tern I Barry Hammond
X Jan Debay hn E. Noyes
X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
X Pat McGui an Thomas E. Lutz
X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz
X William G. Steiner Todd S a"
DISTRICT 1 X 1 Shidev Dettloff.Chair 1 Tom Harman
NO. 11 X I Dave Sullivan, Chair pro tern I Tom Harman
X I Todd Spitzer I William G.Steiner
DISTRICT A Burnie Dunlap,Chair Marty Simonoff
NO, 13 1 X Mark Schwan Chair pro tern Hank Wedas
X Mark A. Mu h Joanne Coontz
X I William G. Steiner I Todd Spitzer
X I Bob Zemel I Tom Dal
DISTRICT I X I Christina Shea,Chair Bany Hammond
NO.14 A I Thomas R. Saltarelli,Chair pro tem Jim Pods
X I Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz
X I William G.Steiner I Todd Spitzer
X I Peer A.Swan I Darryl Miller
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
Don McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle,
Board Secretary; Chris Dahl; Ed Hodges; David Ludwin; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Michelle
Tuchman; Nancy Wheatley; Terri Josway; Mike Moore; Doug Stewart; Ryal Wheeler.
OTHERS PRESENT:
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
DISTRICTS 1. 3. 6&7
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the
following re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor)
City/Agency District Active Director Alternate Director
Cypress 3 Mary Ann Jones' Tom Carroll
Costa Mesa
Sanitary District 1, 6&7 James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry
Midway City
Sanitary District 3 Margie L. Rice Russell C. Paris
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
12/17/97
Page 4 of 11
DISTRICTS 5, 6 &7
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor
Thomas Cole Edwards of the City of Newport Beach from the Boards of Directors of District
Nos. 5, 6 and 7, and seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
5. 6&7 Jan Debay John E. Noyes
5 John E. Noyes Jan Debay
DISTRICT 3
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file letter from the City of Cypress re
appointment of Tim Keenan as Alternate Director for Mary Ann Jones for the meeting of
December 17, 1997 only.
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR
The Joint Chair reported there would be no committee meetings in January with the exception of
the Steering Committee. He also noted there was a tentative New Directors'Workshop
scheduled for January 31st. If there are few new Directors, the time may be spent on an update
of the strategic plan.
Chair Collins then announced that at the December SARBS meeting, several employees were
presented awards. Simon Watson was named Maintenance Person of the year, Kelly
Christianson was named Industrial and Hazardous Waste Person of the Year; and Chloe Dao
and Vladimir Kogan received the Project of the Year award. These employees will now go on to
compete against other region winners for state awards.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager recognized Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, who
briefed the Directors regarding the major rainstorm of December 6.
Mr. McIntyre also recognized Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, who reported on
the draft 301(h)waiver permit, which was received by the Districts that day. Ms. Wheatley
outlined the key points contained within the permit. She also briefly reviewed the requirements
the Districts would follow prior to the permit becoming effective.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
The General Counsel referred the Directors to two memoranda included in their meeting folders
that evening. The first memo was a status report regarding the Merrill Lynch litigation on the
bankruptcy. Mr. Woodruff reported the bankruptcy hearing was set for the following week and
most of the money recovered would be going to the school districts.
The second memo was a litigation status report regarding the sewer spill incident of
February 1996 and the Districts' claim against the Bayside Cove Community Association. The
claim was recently tried before a jury, which, upon conclusion, awarded the Districts the full
amount of its claim plus court costs.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
12/17/97
Page 5 of 11
APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts)
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held
November 19, 1997. the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS (All Districts)
MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District
claims set forth on exhibits "A", "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes,
and summarized below:
ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/97 10M/97
Joint Operating Fund $1,156,262.17 $1,511.814.48
Capital Outlay Revolving fund 249,950.03 2,260,775.96
Self-Funded Insurance Funds 12,828.64 311,260.02
District No. 1 0.00 780.43
District No. 2 3,971.88 1,740.59
District No. 3 13,851.43 7.571.73
District No. 5 0.00 197,299.00
District No. 6 0.00 0.00
District No. 7 23,570.34 0.00
District No. 11 6,800.00 397.96
District No. 13 0.00 0.00
District No. 14 0.00 0.00
TOTALS $1 467 234 49 94.291.640.17
Directors Todd Spitzer and Mark Leyes abstained.
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
10.b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was
presented by Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of Steering Committee, re the
December 17, 1997 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
November 19, 1997 to be filed.
10.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Motion was amended to approve
participation of Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, in the Water
Environment Federation's Technical Conference, being held in March 1998, in
Singapore,Asia; and approve reimbursement for transportation, lodging, meals and
incidental expenses in accordance with Districts' established expense reimbursement
policies.
Directors Don Bankhead, Mark Leyes, Mark A. Murphy, Todd Spitzer, William G.
Steiner, Peer A. Swan and Bob Zemel opposed the motion.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
12/17/97
Page 6 of 11
11.b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Pal McGuigan, Chair
of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the December 3,
1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held December 3, 1997 to be filed.
11.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to enter into an
agreement with Pima Gro for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to
the Districts, in a form approved by General Counsel.
11.d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize staff to enter into an
amended agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District for a
heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in a form
approved by General Counsel.
12.b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Joint Chair John Collins due
to the absence of the Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services
Committee, re the December 4, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and
referring to the draft minutes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services
Committee Minutes for the meeting held December 4, 1997 to be filed.
12.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Job
Nos. J-34-1 and 132-35-5 with Advance Constructors, Inc. For Ocean Outfall Reliability
Upgrades and Phase II Site and Security Improvements in the amount of$71,557.
12.d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Job
No. P1-36-2 with Margate Construction, Inc. For Secondary Treatment Improvements at
Plant No. 1 in the amount of$69,628.
12.e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve an increase in authorized funds
of$188,000, bringing the project total to$1,208,400 to cover all anticipated costs
required to complete construction of the Compressed Natural Gas(CNG) Refueling
Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid).
Director Mark Schwing opposed the motion.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
12/17/97
Page 7 of 11
12.f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. 97-37, as
amended, Establishing Policies and Procedures for Selection and Procurement of
Professional Engineering, Architectural, Environmental, Land Surveying and
Construction Management Services; Approval of Plans and Specifications; Approval of
Construction Change Orders, and repealing Resolution Nos. 90-43, 94-110, and 95-9.
Directors Bruce Broadwater, Mark Leyes, Todd Spitzer and Bob Zemel opposed the
motion.
13.b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair
of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the December 10,
1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the
meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources
Committee Minutes for the meeting held December 10, 1997 to be filed.
13.c. MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for
the month of November 1997.
13.d. MOVED, SECONDED,AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file and approve letter dated
November 6, 1997 from Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) requesting a
waiver of late payment interest charges assessed by Districts' staff for treatment plant
capacity.
13.e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adoption of a formal borrowing and
lending program by the Boards of Directors of the individual Districts in order to provide
for inter-District loans, with interest, while the Strategic Plan is being completed and a
long-term financial plan is being prepared.
DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11 & 13
14. Public hearing relative to the following proposed Ordinances of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 of Orange County, California,
amending ordinances relative to exemptions, rebates and refunds of sanitary sewer
service charges:
Amending
District Ordinance No. Ordinance No.
1 134 133
2 224 223
3 327 326
5 535 516
6 630 629
7 737 736
11 1126 1125
13 1319 1303
OPEN HEARING: The Joint Chair declared the hearing opened at 8:20 p.m.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
12/17/97
Page B of 11
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL: General Counsel Thomas Woodruff reported this
was a second reading of proposal ordinance relations to exemptions, rebates and
refunds of sewer service charges.
CLOSE HEARING: The Joint Chair declared the hearing closed at 9:22 p.m.
DISTRICT 1
Ordinance No. 134,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California,Amending Ordinance No. 133 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates
and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 134 by title only,
and waive reading of entire ordinance.
It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 134:
AYES: Pat McGuigan, Chair, James M. Ferryman; Mark A. Murphy; Todd Spitzer
NOES: None
ABSENT: Thomas R. Saltarelli
DISTRICT 2
Ordinance No. 224, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 223 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates
and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 224 by title only,
and waive reading of entire ordinance.
It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 224:
AYES: Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair, Steve Anderson; Don Bankhead; Bruce
Broadwater, John Collins; Barry Denes; Pat McGuigan; Mark A. Murphy; Todd
Spitzer, Hank Wedaa; Bob Zemel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
12/17/97
Page 9 of 11
DISTRICT 3
Ordinance No. 327, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3
of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 326 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates
and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 327 by title only,
and waive reading of entire ordinance.
It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 327:
AYES: Margie Rice, Chair, Steve Anderson; Don Bankhead; Eva M. Bradford; George
Brown; John Collins; Tim Keenan; Mark Leyes; Patsy Marshall; Pat McGuigan;
Todd Spitzer, Dave Sullivan; Charles E. Sylvia; Bob Zemel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Brian Donahue; Bumie Dunlap
DISTRICT 5
Ordinance No. 535, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates
and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 535 by title only,
and waive reading of entire ordinance.
It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 535:
AYES: Jan Debay, Chair,William G. Steiner
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DISTRICT 6
Ordinance No. 630, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6
of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 629 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates
and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 630 by title only,
and waive reading of entire ordinance.
It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 630:
AYES: James M. Ferryman, Chair, Jan Debay; William G. Steiner
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
12/17/97
Page 10 of 11
DISTRICT 7
Ordinance No. 737, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 736 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates
and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 737 by title only,
and waive reading of entire ordinance.
It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 737:
AYES: Christina Shea, Chair pro tem; Jan Debay; James M. Ferryman; Pat McGuigan;
Mark A. Murphy;William G. Steiner
NOES: None
ABSENT: Thomas R. Saltarelli
DISTRICT 11
Ordinance No. 1126, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1125 Relating to Exemptions,
Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
A motion was made, seconded and unanimously monied to read Ordinance No. 1126 by title
only, and waive reading of entire ordinance.
It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 1126:
AYES: Shirley Dettloff, Chair, Todd Spitzer, Dave Sullivan
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DISTRICT 13
Ordinance No. 1319, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Relating to Exemptions,
Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to read Ordinance No. 1319 by ties
only, and waive reading of entire ordinance.
It was further moved to adopt Ordinance No. 1319:
AYES: Mark Schwing, Chair pro tem; Mark A. Murphy; William G. Steiner, Bob Zemel
NOES: None
ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
12/17/97
Page 11 of 11
DISTRICT 2
15.a. DRAFT SELECTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: The Chair ordered the Selection
Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 3, 1997 to be filed.
15.b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Selection
Committee certification and approve Professional Services Agreement with
Holmes & Narver to design and prepare the construction documents for
Replacement of Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate, Contract No. 2-40, in
an amount not to exceed $54,981.00.
ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:26 p.m.
AW4_4-
Secretary of Boa of Directors of
County Sani ti n Di cts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 & 1
Prdon\datal\wp.&a�dmWSSWMT121797.doc
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County -
Claims Paid 10115/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Descdption
7087 Barclays Bank PLC $93,620.10 Loc Quarterly Fees
7088 Bic Oro Division $27,466.08 Residuals Removal MO 4-26.95
7089 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $87,Bo0A0 Engineering Services
7090 Catollo Engineers $51.514.03 Engineering Servicas J-33.2
7091 Dell Marketing L.P. $46,011.01 Computers
7092 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $78,277.37 Naulural Gas
7093 General Physics Corp $64.000.00 Professional Services
7094 J.D.Edwards Warts Solutions $87,39D.00 Software License Fees MO 7-2448
7095 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. $68.295.64 Ferric Cloride MO 9.27-95
7096 Maim Health Act Financial $132.225.61 Mega Premium
7097 Mike Pdlch&Sons $104.683.09 Construction 3-35-R
7098 Orange County Wholesale Electric $30.452.54 Instrument Supplies
7099 Science Applications Ing.,Cc $45.398.50 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8.94
7100 Tub Ra tch/Magan Farms $45,199.63 Residuals Removal
7101 A T&T-Magacam Service $2,595.15 Lang Distance Telephone Services
7102 AT&T-Cellular CR&R $5.72 Long Distance Telephone Services
7103 Air Uqulde America Corporation $1,627.59 Specialty Gases
7104 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. $9,180.30 Manhole Frames&Covers
7105 American Metal Bearing Company $110.36 Credit Note Reimbursement
7106 American Water Works Assoc. $428.00 Conference Registration
7107 Anabolic Inc. $210.00 Crecift Note Reimbursement
Y, 7108 Anthony Peal Control,Inc. $395.00 Service Agreement
rt 7109 Apco Valve And Pdmer Corporation $703.69 Valve Pads
3v 7110 Appleone Employment Service $3.000.81 Temporary Employment Services
F, 7111 Awards&Trophies By Bea $70.90 Plaques
7112 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $200.00 Telephone Installation
7113 Battery Specialtes $4.728.20 Batteries
7114 Sawa . $122.86 Valve Pads
7115 Black Box Corporation $331.41 Computer Pads
7116 Bog Delivery $107.00 Freight
7117 Boulevard Development Inc. $420.05 Refundable Annexation Fee
7118 Boyle Engineering Corporation $21.414.41 Engineering Services 7.71
7119 Boyle Engineedng Corporation $12,312.63 Engineering Services 3-35
7120 Brown And Caldwell $3.646.88 Engineering Services P2-35-3,P2-35-3
7121 BNI Building News $141.06 Publications
7122 Calalympic Safety $1,926.43 Safely Supplies
7123 Cellrol,Inc. $4,294.02 Hardware
7124 Cashcu,Inc. $78.39 Valve Pads
7125 City of seal Beach $124.40 Water use
7126 The City Associates,Inc. $3.437.50 Hearing Officer Services
7127 Barbara A.Collins $354.06 Expense Relmb.
7128 Compucom 12,215.26 Software
7129 Compuse,Inc. $415.30 Electronic&Computer Supplies
7130 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $481.95 Electronic Parts
7131 Construction Fabricators Inc. $5.921.16 Construction Services
7132 Continental-McLaughlin $318.76 Tools
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 10/15/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Descnp0on
7133 Cooper Cameron Corporation 5203.64 Engine Parts
7134 Corporate Express $197.70 Office Supplies
7135 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. $1,52&33 Mechanical Supplies
7136 County of Orange $169.00 Training Registration
7137 County of Orange E720.00 Administrative Fees
7138 CountyofOmnge E6,800.00 Replenish DIV. 11 Interest B Sinking Fund
7139 County Clerk $3&00 Dammam Hardling Fee
7140 County Wholesale Electric Co. $2.006.20 Electric Parts
7141 CPI-The Alternative Supplier $1,631.01 Lab Supplies
7142 CS Company $2,387.96 Plumbing Supplies
7143 CWEA $875.00 Conference Registrations
7144 D'Vals Sales Company $10.82 Fittings
7145 Daly Pilot 568.75 Notices&Ads
7146 Del Mar Analytical $380.00 BlosoOds Analysis
7147 Dover Elevator Company 51,067.63 Elevator Maintenance
7148 Dunkel Bros.Machinery Moving $600.00 Freight
7149 DGA Consultants,Inc. $1.764.16 Engineering Services 2-34R
7150 Eberhard Equipment $1.682.22 Equipment Repair
7151 EcoAnaysis,Inc. 540.00 Consulting Services
7152 Enchanter,Inc. $7.000.00 Ocean MonBOBng MO 524-95
7153 Enter IRD International $2.189.10 Equipment Repair
71M Executive Enterprises $1,495.00 Seminar Registration
7155 Federal Express $503.25 Air Freight
rr 7156 Filter Supply Company $666.95 Fibers
yj 7157 Fisher Scientific $432.40 Lab Supplies
^1 7158 Flat and Vertical,Inc. 5266.00 Concrete Cutting
7159 Flo-Systems,Inc. $7.989.82 Pump Parts
7160 ForOa Benefits Insurance Company $17.453.11 Insurance Premiums Oct 97
7151 Fountain Valley Florist $89A3 Funeral Anangement For Richard Randall
7162 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $646.50 Paint Supplies
7163 Franklin Quest Co. $976.50 Office Supplies
7164 Fys Electronics $5.188.96 Electronic&Computer Supplies
7165 City of Fullerton $326.16 Water Use
7166 Gallade Chemical Inc. $346.20 Chemicals
7167 The Gas Company $2,664.91 Natural Gas
7168 Gerald S.Schaan $1.637.50 Training Consultant
7169 Graphic Distributors $102.22 Photographic Supplies
7170 Graling Pacific Inc. $2,383.43 Fiberglass Grating
7171 The Great American Printing Cc $145.43 Priding
7172 EST,Inc./Micro City $8.150.79 Office Supplies
7173 Harold Primness Ica $84.00 Ice For Samples
7174 High-Polnl Randal E1,081.00 Consulting Services
7175 Hoerbiger Service Inc $26.52 Compressor Pads
7176 Hoare Depot $568.26 Small Hardware
7177 Horiba Instruments Inc $907.98 Electric Pars
7178 Ctty of Huntington Beach $21.25 Water Use
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 10/15/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7179 Hydrate[ $4.476.69 Luba Oil
7180 Industrial Hearing&Pulmonary $2,485.00 Audlomemc&Pulmonary Testing Of Employees
7181 Industrial Threaded Products, $335.34 Connectors
7182 Inorganic Ventures,Inc $32&31 Lab Supplies
7183 Interstate Battery Systems $1.253.24 Baeeries
7184 Irvine Photo Graphics $321A8 Photographic Supplies
7185 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $1,429.82 Instrument Pads
7186 J.D.Edwards $2,800.00 Training Registration
7187 J.P.Nissen Co $56.32 Ofics Supplies
7188 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $2,333.07 Construction Services
7189 Jaya Catering $2,321.15 Directors Meeting Expense
7190 Johnstone Supply $295.50 Electric Pads
7191 J2 Printing Services $657.28 Printing
7192 Knox Industrial Supplies $253.94 Tools
7193 LA Cellular Telephone Company $4,855.59 Cellular Telephone Service
7194 La Palma Car Wash $1.228.11 Truck Wash Tickets
7195 Lab Safety Suppy,lnc. $2,941.24 Safety Supplies
7196 Lab Systems $6,700.00 Installation Integration Services
7197 Lebware Inc. $600.00 Training Registration
7198 Lee&Ro Inc $19.10.14 Engineering Services
7199 Lessons in Leadership $299.00 Seminar Registration
7200 Deborah L.United $730.20 Expense Reimb.
rt 7201 Local Agency Formation Commission $1,950.00 Processing Fee
q 7202 LA Cellular Telephone Company $170.62 Telephone Equipment
tN 7203 Maintenance Products,Inc. $6,73421 Mechanical Supplies
7204 Maintenance Technology Corp. $572.05 Tools
7205 Me Fadden-Dale Hardware Co. $69.63 Coolant
7208 McKenna Engineering&Equipment $M.30 Valve Parts
7207 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. $743.85 Tools
7208 Measurement Variables,Inc. $681.96 Filters
7209 Medlin Controls Co. $721.12 Instrument Supplies
7210 Meeting Planners Plus $473,19 Professional Services
7211 Mierobae Laboratories,Inc. $4,140.00 Gas Analysis
7212 Microbe Masters $1,807.92 Advanced Bio Cultures
7213 Midway Mfg&Machining Cc $1,030.00 Mechanical Repairs
7214 Mission Abrasive Supplies $598.01 Safety Supplies
7215 Mission Uniform Service $2,164.22 Uniform Rentals
7216 Moreland&Associates $11,543.32 Audlting Services MO 341-95
7217 MotoPhoto $59.05 Photographic Supplies
7218 National Technical Information $35.50 Publication
7219 National Technology Transfer $595.00 Seminar Registration
7220 Neal Supply Company $128.22 Plumbing Supplies
7221 Network Catalyst $5.783.31 Consultant
7222 New Horizons Computer Learning $5,398.00 On-site Training
7223 Newark Electronics $276.27 Instrument Parts
7224 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. $1.261.50 Lubricants/Diesel Fuel
County Sanitation Distnms Of Orange County
Claims Paid 10/15/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7225 The Norm Companies $100.55 Mail Delivery Service
7226 Occupational Vision Services $529.18 Safety Glasses
7227 Office Depot Business SeMms $1,987.96 Office Supplies
7228 Omega Corporation $1.796.81 Lob Supplies
7229 On Technology Corporation $2,922.75 Software Upgrades
7230 Orange County Business Council $20.00 Workshop Registration
7231 Orange County Farm Supply $345.12 Chemicals
7232 Orange Courier $206.10 Coudersarvims
7233 Orange Valve&Fitting Company $194.33 Fittings
7234 Oxygen Service Company $2,063.57 Specialty Gases
7235 OI Coporellon $638.96 Lab Supplies
7236 P.L.Hawn Company Inc. $134.35 Electric Supplies
7237 Pacific Bell $19.35 Telephone Services
7238 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2,808.80 Plumbing Supplies
7239 Pacific Pert and Controls,Inc $13.210.45 Instrument Parts
7240 Pacific Publishers $108.18 Publication
7241 Panmouse Tire,Inc. $1,946.12 Tires
7242 Parkson Corporation $400.19 Freight
7243 Parts Unlimited $975.70 Truck Pens
7244 Peak Technologies $130.00 Wax/Resin Ribbons
7245 Premier Fastener Company $311.27 Tools
7246 Presidium.Inc. $2.083.33 Workers Comp Claim Administration.
N 7247 Progressive Business Publication $23D00 Subscriptions
7 7248 Public Officials for Water&Environmental Reform $310.00 Conference Registration
I 7249 Putzmai der,Inc. $62.91 Pump Pads
7250 PC Connection,Inc. $8200 Computer Parts
7261 Quality Compressor,Inc. $1,562.38 Compressor
7252 R&J Sheet Metal, Inc. $2,062.00 Metal
7253 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. SIS76.83 Electric Parts
7254 Red Wing Shoes $309.46 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
7255 Relsh Marina Studies,Inc. $460.00 Oman Monitoring
7256 Rellastar $8.288.00 Ufa Insurance Premium
7257 Rellastar Bankers Security Life Insurance $4,843.27 Voluntary Life Insurance Premium
7258 RM Controls $79.20 Office Supplies
7259 Sears $68.55 Office Supplies
7260 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc. 5449.64 Tools
7261 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $1.209.71 Tools/Hardware
7262 SigmaAMrich,Inc. $289.21 Lab Supplies
7263 Sloen Electric Company $11,600.00 Motor Repairs
7264 Sm6h Pipe&Supply Inc $253.63 Plumbing Supplies
7265 So.Col.Coalition for Pollution Prevention $250.00 Conference Registration
7266 Society for Human Resource Man $610.00 Seminar Registration
7267 Society of Env.Toxicology&Chemistry $670.00 Meeting Registration
7288 Som-Lynch Corp. $87.24 Janitorial Services
7269 South Coast Air Duality Mngt. $171 SD Permit Fees
7270 South Croat Air Quality Mgmt. $9.492.60 Permit Fees
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 10/15197
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7271 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $11.170.10 Permit Fees
7272 South Coast Air Quality Mgml. $171 90 Permit Fees
7273 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $5,15790 Permit Fees
7274 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $17790 Perna Fees
7275 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $171 90 Permit Fees
7276 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $25.00 Permit Fees
7277 South Coast Water $160.00 Lab Supplies
7278 Southern California Air Conditioning Distributors $1,384,59 Heat Pump
7279 Stalehlet $98.00 Seminar Registration
7280 Sleding Ad $14.76 Ad Supplies
7281 Steven Enterprises,Inc. $708A2 Plotter Supplies
7282 Strata International,Inc. $957.93 Chemicals
7283 Summit Steel $2,472.22 Metal
7254 Sunset Ford $144.00 Trick Parts
7285 Sunset Industrial Pads $50M Hose
7286 Superb One-Hour Photo $21d6 Photographic Services
7287 The Holman Group $775.32 EAP Premium Od 97
7288 Thermo Jarrell Ash Baird $174.45 Pump Pads
7289 Thompson Industrial Supply.Ina $226.37 Mechanical Pane
7290 Transcal $1.008.14 Electrical Pads
7291 Trsplal Plus Nursery,Inc. $3,973.84 Contract Greur lskeeping MO 5.11-94
7292 Trick 8 Auto Supply,Inc. $284.Ob Track Parts
rh 7293 Truesdall Laboratories,Inc. $2.722.00 Lab Services
7294 Ultra Scientific $220.00 Lab Supplies
I 7295 United Parcel Service $48.85 Parcel Services
Ln 7285 Urban Water Institute,Inc. $176.00 Membership
7297 Vako Instruments Co.Inc. $283.94 Lab Supplies
7298 Valley CBIes Supply Company $2.938.58 Plumbing Supplies
7289 Veme§Plumbing $40.00 Plumbing Services
7300 Vlllalobos B Associates $11,951.23 Engineering Services
7301 VWR Scientific Products $5,628.42 Lab Supplies
7302 The Wackenhut Corporation $6,020.86 Contract Service-Security Guards
7303 Waste Markets $4.464.05 Residuals Removal MO 3.27-96
7304 Water Environment Federation $1.281.50 Seminar Registration
7305 Waters Corporation $1,225.34 Service Agreement
7305 Wayne Electric Go. $362.04 Badlands
7307 Western States Chemical Inc. $17,872.16 Caustic Soda Me 8.23-95
7308 Westinghouse Electric Corporation $23,000.00 Electrical Engineering Services
7309 Wdeg Scientific $217.17 Lab Supplies
7310 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $3,618.17 Professional Services
7311 WEHA Publishing $74.00 Publication
7312 WIN Grainger Inc. $661.59 Compressor Pads
7313 %emu Corporation $3.455.58 Copler Leases
7314 Yellow Springs Instrument Co., $90.39 Lab Supplies
7315 Blake Anderson $1,0117.40 Expense Rehab.
7316 Nicholas J.Adhered; $314.92 Expense Relmb.
County Sanitation Disidds Of Orange County
Claims Paid 10/15/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7317 Beet Buy and Absolon Decestro $2,648.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
7318 Dean M.Carries $195.60 Expense Reims.
7319 Patrick M.Carillo $2.802.58 Employee Computer Loan Program
7320 George A.Charette $198.57 Expense Reims.
7321 Peter Chaffs $224.31 Expanse Reims.
7322 Donald R.Cleveland $365.07 Expense Reimb.
7323 James E.Colston $1,929.15 Employee Computer Loan Program
7324 Ronald L.Devitt.Jr $155.55 Expense Reimb.
7325 Darrell S.Ennis $196.81 Expense Reimb.
7326 Timothy D.Foley $167.75 Expanse Relents.
7327 Tom E.Gavromkl $213.85 Expense Reimb.
7328 W.Doug Hauser $117.99 Expense Reimb,
7329 Roy A.Handy $355.20 Expense Reimb.
7330 Larry E.Lazorek $351,82 Expense Palms.
7331 Cherie M.Lelsten $174,26 Expense Reimb.
7332 Noeno C.Loopando $718,45 Expense Reimb.
7333 Michael E.McCarthy $230A6 Expense Rehmb.
7334 Michael J.McCusker $467.70 Expense Reimb.
7335 Scott M.Mebust $355.10 Expense Reimb.
7336 John Mlrkovich $139.80 Expense Reimb.
7337 Paul A.Mitchell $3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
Y_ 7338 Nylon Computer and Mike MCKusker $1,813.71 Employee Computer Loan Program
re 7339 Joseph W.Palk,Jr. $354.63 Expense Reimb.
q 7340 Michael Reldeler $174.26 Expense Rehmb.
m
7341 Royal Computer and Ehem Worse $2,724.75 Employee Computer Loan Program
7342 Joe D.Sanderson 8425.49 Expense Reimb.
7343 Rudolf Schaap $175.80 Expense Reimb.
7344 James 0.Tlnlle $351.82 Expense Palms.
7345 Mitchell J.Trhbimm,lc l $381.82 Expense Reimb.
7346 Bobby L.Unsell $168.20 Expense Reimb.
7347 Slmon L.Watson $30.00 Expense Reimb.
7348 Nancy J.Wheatley $192.10 Expanse Reimb,
7349 James L.Wybonga $230.16 Expense Reimb.
7350 Michael I.Zedek $218.17 Expense Reimb.
7351 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County $12,828.64 Workers Camp Reimb,
7352 County sanitation Districts of orange county $1,016.63 Petty Cash Reimb.
7353 National Research Coundl Canada $325.00 Publications
7354 County Clerk $36.00 Permit Fees
7355 Local Agency Formation Commission $950.00 Permit Fees
7356 Science Applications Intl.,Cc $10,918.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94
7357 Jana H.Train $173.17 Expense Reimb.
7358 Daniel E.Tunnldi f $321.92 Expense Rehab.
Total Claims Paid 10115A)7 $1,467,234.49
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County e
Claims Paid 10/15/97
Summary Amount
District No.2 $3,971.80
District No.3 $13.851.43
Distr at No.7 $23,570.34
District No.11 $8,800.00
CORP $249,950.03
Self Insurance Funds $12,828.64
Joint Opereeore $1.156,262.17
$1,067,230./9
F9
r
rt
0s
J
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 10/29/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Descripgon
7378 Advance Constructors Inc $445,311.90 Construction J-341,P2-3%
7379 Air Products and Chemicals,Inc. $45.013.56 O&M Agreement Ozy Gen.Syst.MO 841-89
7380 Alrpol Construction,Inc. $255,657.56 Construction PI-51R
7381 Biu Gen Division $25,202.68 Residuals Removal MO 4.26-95
7382 Camllo Engineers $48,261.05 Engineering Services PI-38,P243.3
7383 Dail Marketing L.P. 542,130.T Computers
7384 FMC Carpomtlon-Chemical Products $117,620.26 Hydrogen Peroxide MO 9.14.94
7385 J.D.Edwards World Solutions $30.518.45 Software license Fees MO 7-24.96
7385 Ke nuon Pacific,Ina. 5103,964.61 Fanlc Chloride MO9-27-95
7387 Labwans Inc $53.650.00 Lab Information Mgmt System Software
73BB Margate Construction Inc. $1,153.233.53 Construction PI-36-2,P141,P143
7389 Mac Analytical System $43,424.00 Professional Services
7390 Orange County Water District $47,251.20 GAP Water Use MO6-&93
7391 Paclflcere of Ca $39,017.87 Medical Insurance Premium
7392 Pascal$Ludwig,Inc. $228.355.00 Construction J-33.2
7383 Pima Gro Systems Inc $85.198.65 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95
7394 Polypum,Inc.Wor Polydyne,Inc. $42.794.87 Cetienlc Potynrer MO 3.11-92
7395 Remedy $27.449.28 Temporary Employment Services
1396 Sverdrup Chdl,Ina $438.016.60 Construction P2-354
7397 Tula Ranch/Magan Fames $38,444.09 Residuals Removal
7398 Western Stales Chemical Inc $31. 02.32 Caustic Soda Me 8-23-95
7399 Woodruff,Spradlm B Smart $66.214.46 Legal Services MO 7-26.95
M 7400 American Telephone 8 Telegraph-Cellular OR 8 R $4.38 Long Distance Telephone Services
b] 7401 American Telephone 8 Telegraph-Cellular OR 8 R $89.02 Long Distance Telephone Services
7402 A-Pius Systems $748.27 Notices 8 Ads
7403 Air Uqukle America Corporation E288.85 Specialty Gasses
7404 Aladdin House $57.32 Mini Blinds
7405 Afts-Robbins.Inc. $293.16 Instrument Supplies
7406 Amedan Media Inc. $1,688.45 Training Publications
7407 Anlater Inc. $1,625.05 Computer Supplies
7408 Appleone Employment Service $1,131.60 Temporary Employment Services
7409 Applied Industrial Technology $258.24 Pump Pads
7410 Airs Disposal Service,Inc. $310.40 Toxic Waste Removal
7411 Asbury Environmental Services $35.00 Waste Oil Removal
7412 Ashme $416.00 Publications
7413 Assoc of Metropolitan Sewerego $590.00 Workshop Registration
7414 Awards B Trophies By Bea $34.98 Plaques
7415 ABM Business Machines,Inc. $119.93 Office Supplies
7416 AM Leonard $91.48 Live Animal Traps
7417 AMA/Kaye Productivity Center $159.00 Seminar Registration
7418 AWSI $249.00 D.O.T.Training Program
7419 Bailey Fischer S Porter Company $9.23 Chlorination Supplies
7420 Bank of America $313.87 Banking Services
7421 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $1.916.69 Telephone Installation
7422 Battery Speciakles 5417.21 Bafteres
7423 Ben Meadows Company,Inc. $90.31 Tool.
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 10/29197
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7424 Seman Press $115.54 Publication
7425 Black Progress Revlew, $395.00 Ads&Notices
7426 Bolsa Radiator Semice $172.40 Truck Repairs
7427 Bob Delivery $111.00 Freight
742E Borland International $1.095.76 Computer Parts
7429 Boyle Engineering Corporation $1,059.50 Engineering Services 7.18
7430 Brenner-Fledler&Assoc Inc $384.59 Generators
7431 Budget Janaodal,Inc. $3.605.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94
7432 California Auto Refrigeration $83.73 Refrigerator Parts
7433 California Automatic Gate $1,017.51 Service Agreement
7434 California Comfort Vans $269.38 Van Parts
7435 Calolympic Safety $2,406.70 Safety Supplies
7436 CaBrol,Inc. $1.248.18 Hardware
7437 Canus Corporation $513.66 Fiber Optic Cable
7438 Card Warren It Co. $300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator
7439 Carleton Engineers&Consultants $15.75 Engineering Services-Air Quality
7440 Catapult lnc $4.000.00 On-Site Training
7441 Cemrepoirda Commercial Int. $2.181.52 Office Fum0ure
7442 Century Safety $720.26 Safety Supplies
7443 The Cobb Group $59.00 Subsaip6en
7444 Compuserve Incorporated $927.52 Computer Services
t„ 7445 Computers America,Inc. $1,587.15 Computer Supplies
R�e 7446 Compuxpress and Michas Stromgren $1,3116.83 Employee Computer Loan Program
l 7447 Compuxpress and Tim Colamomm $2.021.05 Employee Computer Loan Program
N 7448 Connell GM Pads $241.99 Truck Parts
7449 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $97.65 Electric Pads
7450 Cooper Cameron Corporation $4,232.02 Engine Pads
7451 Copelco Capital,Inc. $1.432.00 Color Copier Lease
7452 Corporate Express $1,345.95 Office Supplies
7453 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. $1,447.03 Mechanical Supplies
7454 County Sanitation District of OC $59.45 Petty Cash Reimb.
7455 County Wholesale Electric Co. $4,930.83 Electric Pads
7456 Crane Pro Services $207.00 Crane Parts
7457 California Assoicialian Of Sanitation Agencies $25.00 Conference Registration
7458 CH2MHI9 $5.458.59 Professional Services
7459 Confidential Management Services $5,526.04 Professional Services
7460 CRC Press,Inc. $210.11 Lab Supplies
7461 CS Company $3,704.18 Plumbing Supplies
7462 CWEA $715.00 Seminar Registdion
7463 Cristopher D.Dahl $1.755.91 Expense Reimb.
7464 Del Mar Analytical $1.788.00 Blosolids Analysis
7465 Diamond H Recognition $38.02 Service Awards
7466 Digital Equipment Corporation $5.665.00 Computer
7467 DGA Consultants,Inc. $1,855.00 Engineering Services MO 6.8-94
7468 DME,Inc. $1.970.40 Compressor Pads
7469 Eagle Distribution $867.13 Track Parts
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 10/29/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7470 Eberhard Equipment $187.44 Tractor Repair
7471 Edwards High Vacuum International $907.17 Lab Supplies
7472 Egghead Software $65.83 Software
7473 Eledm Bond,Inc. $4,716.76 Equipment Repair
7474 Electrorack Products Co.,Inc. $502.59 Permit Fee Refund
7475 Emergency Management Network $2.630.00 CPR/First Aid Training
7476 Enchanter,Inc. $4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring NO5-24-95
7477 Enterprise Rent-A-Car $1,030.26 Uabilay Claim Settlement
7478 Envision of Irvine and Terry Matthews $2.125.69 Employee Computer Loan Program
7479 Expmien $117.92 Orange County Property Info Lease on CD Rom
748D Express Paper B Graphics Store $211.62 Paper
7481 ENS Resources,Inc. $6.065.46 Professional Services
7482 Fairbanks Scales,Inc. $480.00 Service Agreement
7453 Fibedron $711.75 Fiber Optic Cable
7404 Flltedine Corporation $800.D4 Fifters
7465 Fleming Engineering,Inc $4,246.11 Sewer Repair
7466 Flickinger Company $545.03 Pump Pads
7487 Flo-Systems,Inc. $3.014.53 Pump Pads
7488 Forked Engineering 8 Surveying $3,960.00 Engineering Services MO 15,25-97
7489 Foss Environmental $46.45 Freight
7490 Fountain Valley Camera $22709 Photo Supplies
7491 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $822.30 Paint Supplies
r'. 7492 Franklin Guest $536.00 Seminar Registration
7493 Franklin Ouest Go. $98.64 Office Supplies
7494 Fry's Electronics $730.00 Electronic B Computer Supplies
w 7495 Fys Electronics and Steve Pelletier $2,908.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
7498 Gallade Chemical Inc. $395.66 Chemicals
7497 Gerraft-Callahan Company $113.14 Chemicals
7498 Gartner Group Inc. $10,775.00 Software
7499 Galas Fiberglass Installers $12,504.12 Equipment Repair
7500 General Binding Corporation $1.007.99 Office Machine Repairs
7501 GTE Cal6omfa $9,953.80 Telephone Services
7502 Gierllch-Mitchell,Inc. $3.313.25 Pump Pads
7503 Government Finance Officers Asssoc. $65.00 Agency Membership
7504 Graphic Distributors $853.92 Photographic Supplies
7505 Gressel,STI $6.160.47 Engine Pads
75M The Great American Printing Cc $525.47 Printing
7507 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $1,039.84 Janitorial Supplies
7508 Haldeman Inc. $170.09 Pump Parts
7609 Harold Primrose Ice $80.00 ice For Samples
7510 Herrington Industrial Plastics $7.373.78 Plumbing Supplies
7511 Hatch$Kirk Inc. $4.111.19 Tmtlr Pads
7512 Haulaway Storage Containers $1,658.00 Container Rentals
7513 Here's Blackforest Bakery 8 Dail $24.90 Diredor5 Meeting Expense
7514 Heresite Protective Coatings $157.21 Protective Coaling Spray
7515 HswleBFarkmd $286.39 Service Agreement
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County y -
Claims Paid 10/29/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7516 HIBI Inc $1,413.65 Tools
7517 Holmes It Narver Inc $8,180.54 Engineering Services
7518 Linde L.Holmes $2,408.25 Hearing Officer
7519 Home Depot $346.07 Small Hardware
7520 Hodba Instruments Inc $907.86 Electric Paris
7521 Huntington Pool&Spa Supply $355.52 Pump
7522 MACH Company $135.00 Water Testing Chemicals
7523 Industrial Steam $4,435.08 Pumps
7524 Industrial Threaded Products $3.968.22 Connectors
7525 Information Resources $1,485.00 Personnel Services
7628 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $159.56 Lab Supplies
7527 Interstate Battery Systems $831.24 Batteries
7528 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $52.66 Water Use
7529 IBM Corporation-Way $648.00 Service Contract
7530 IDE%%Distribution Corp. $180.60 Lab Supplies
7531 IPCO Safety-Ca $580.11 Safety Supplies
7532 ISA Publications $735.00 Subscription
7533 J.O.Tucker and Son,Inc. $1.073.98 Inslrumenl Parts
7534 J.P.Morgan Securities $22,947.12 COP Remarketing Agreement MO 4-2G95
7535 Jamison Engineering,Inc $6.963.12 Constmdlon Services
7536 Janice E.Mcinally,MFCC $1,597.00 Professional Services-liAP
7537 Jays Cafedng $975.21 Directors'Meeting Expense
7538 Johnstone Supply $498.70 Electric Parts
tp 7539 JWC Environmental $11,247.16 Service Agreement
7540 Keiser Foundation Health Plan $22,328.49 Medical Insurance Premium
7541 Kerrie Johnson $132.47 Claim Settlement
7542 Kewaunee Sdenliflc Corporation $3,215.48 Office Furniture
7643 Kimmerle Bros.,Inc $17.76 Mechanical Pads
7544 Knowledge Point $1,200.00 On-She Training
7545 Knox Industrial Supplies $3,495.72 Tools
7546 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. $117.72 Safety Supplies
7547 Laldlew Environmental Svcs $8.440.54 Hazardous Material Disposal
7548 LasarAll Corpandlon $2.521.53 Service Agreement
7549 Unbent.Cassidy&Frierson $6.600.00 Professional Services
7550 Limbo Vision $118.53 Photographic Services
7551 Maintenance Products,Inc. $7.773.00 Mechanical Supplies
7552 Malntenanace Technology Corp. $194.76 Tools
7553 Managing Automaton Software Guides $10.00 Publication
7554 Mar Vac Electronics $239.86 Instrument Supplies
7655 Marry Rothenberg $150.00 Professional Services
7656 Masurre Company $915.55 Safety Supplies
7567 Medlin Controls Co. $1,344.87 Instrument Supplies
7558 Mercury Insurance Group $569.73 Claim Settlement
7559 Mess Mulder $100.47 Truck Paris
7560 Milo Center and Terry Matthew 3482.94 Employee Computer Loan Program
7551 Mid-West Associates $5,397.66 Pump Parts
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 1029/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7562 Midway Mfg B Machining Cc 98,748.W Mechanical Repairs
7563 Millbonics Inc $911.71 Electrie Supplies
7664 Mission Uniform Service $2,187.39 Uniform Rentals
7585 Mobile Modular Management Corp 6258.60 Office Trailer Lease
76M Montgomery Watson $1,148.05 Professlonal Services M02.26-97
7567 Motorola $527.62 Instrument Parts
7568 MotoPhato $18.04 Photographic Services
7569 MPS Photographic Services,Inc 3214.67 Photographic Services
7570 Mina Safety Appliances Company $717.77 Electric Supplies
7571 National Assoc of Stale Purch.Officials 853.45 Publication
7572 National Plant Services.Inc. $3.330.00 Vacuum Truck Services
7573 National Safety Council $500.00 Membership
7574 Natlink Ltd. $4,459.01 Radio System
7575 Network Catalyst $3.752.38 Fiber Opttc Cable
7576 New Horizons Computer Learning $6,000.00 On-Sire Training
7577 Newark Electronics $32.57 Instrument Parts
7678 Nearest,Inc. $1.238.00 Permit Fees
7579 Nexcom and Terry Matthews $289.98 Employee Computer Loan Program
7580 The Norco Companies $103.00 Mail Delivery Service
7581 Numatic Engineering $81.43 Valve Pads
7582 Office Depot Business Services $2.007.99 Office Supplies
7583 Oracle Corporation $23,406.53 License Fees&Consulting Services
M 7584 Orange County Red Cross $120.00 Safety Training
to 7585 Orange County Wholesale Electric 3668.23 Instrument Supplies
1 7586 Orange Valve 8 Filling Company $2.104.82 Fittings
rr 7587 Orkin,Co. $7.801.75 Pump Pads
7585 Orrick,Herrington 8 Sutcliffe $4.000.00 Professional Services-Financial Program
7589 Oxygen Service Company $1,789.87 Specialty Gases
7590 DAG $1,049.76 Software llcense
7591 P.L.Hawn Company Inc. 851.18 Electric Supplies
7592 Pacific Bell $1.309.07 Telephone Services
7593 Pacific Mechanical Supply $5,325.66 Plumbing Supplies
75N Pacific Pans and Controls,Inc. $16.751.70 Instrument Pads
7595 Pads Janitorial Supplies $293.51 Janitorial Supplies
7596 Pagenet $695.69 Rental Equipment
7597 Panel Concepts,Inc. $780.43 Permit Fee Refund
7598 Padhouse Tim,Inc. $530.80 Ties
7598 Patriot Video Productions $310.91 Video Taping Services
7600 Paulus Engineering,Inc. $7,922.00 Conduction 2-7A
7601 Peak Technologies $1,736.00 Office Supplies
7602 Packet Flight Guide $96.00 Publication
7603 Poly Enterprises Inc., $603.40 Safety Supplies
7604 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. $18.60 Elecim;Supplies
7605 Power Systems Testing Company $5.225.00 Electric Pam
7606 Presidium Inc 52,083.33 Workers Comp Claims Administration.
7607 Pryor Resources,Inc. $166.07 Seminar Registration
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 1029/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7608 Pumping Solutions Inc. $9.406.58 Mechanical Supplies
7609 R&R Instrumentation,Inc. $140.54 Electric Pads
7610 Roll Systems Corporation $212.50 Consulting Services
7611 Rellasler 511,797.88 Life Insurance Premium
7612 Rome Sales Company,Inc. $7,540.00 Service Ageemenl
7613 Rden&Tucker Alomeys at law $6,263.79 Legal Services
7014 RD Instruments $90.62 Freight
7615 RJN Group.Inc. $9.000.00 Service Agreement
7616 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc $947.00 Engineering Servloea
7617 RPM Electric Motors $1,341.50 Electric Motor Pads
761a Safety Images $150.85 Safety Supplies
7619 Sancon Ergmeedn0.lnc $2,500.00 Engineering Services
7620 Schenck Trebel $1,053.80 Balancing Machine Printer
7621 Science Applications Intl.,Cc $11.507.03 Ocean Monitoring MO 64-94
7822 Scott Specialty Oases In. $187.28 Specialty Gases
7023 Scott.Reilly&Whitehead $588.22 Legal Services-Personnel Issues
7624 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. $250.00 Lab Repalre
7625 Second-Sun $1.337.87 Light Fixtures
7626 Showbiz Pizza Time $397.95 Permit Fee Refund
7627 Shunduck Sales&Engineering $8.072.98 Toole/Hardware
1- 7628 Slevers $330.90 Filters
V 7629 Simon&Schuster $345.88 Publications
M 7630 Skelar.the $209.00 Equipment Repair
b1 7631 Skill Crag Body Shop 5442.77 Claim Settlement
m 7632 Soca-Lynch Corp. 5482.72 JanOodal Supplies
7633 South Coast Water $10.00 Lab Supplies
7634 Southern CrNfomis Edison $12,294.67 Electrical Facilities Relocation Charges
7635 Southern California Edison $60.00 Conference Registration
7636 Southwest Scientific Inc. $1.149.15 Instrument Paris
7637 Sparkle8s $2.015.62 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals
7638 Spex Co prep Inc. $1.453.40 Lob Supplies
7639 Splmex Company,Inc. $0,126.43 Janitorial Supplies
7640 Slaminet Inc. $95.00 Service Agreement
7641 Summit Steel $8.531.22 Metal
7642 Sunset Ford $750.09 Truck Pads
7643 Supelco Inc $109.70 Lab Supplies
7644 Super Chem Corporation $1,209.55 Chemicals
7645 John W.Swindler $3.422.83 Expense Relmb.
7646 Tekmar Company 5253.20 Cable
7647 The To Bender 5224.34 A/C Dud Work
7648 Theodore Robbins Ford $301.11 Vehicle Rental
7649 Thermo Jarrell Ash Corp. $10.800.00 Service Agreement
7650 Think Earth Environmental Education Foundation $7,000.00 Membership
7651 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $330.79 Mechanical Parts
7652 Tonga Lock&Safe Semim $138.01 Locks&Keys
7653 Aerelund FlnancieOTop Hal Productions $241.09 Directors Meeting Expense
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 10/29/97
Check No. - Vendor Amount Descrlpllon
7654 Toshiba International Corporation $160.77 Instrument Pads
7655 Troplal Plaza Nursery,Inc. $3,735.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO5-11-94
7656 Truck and Auto Supply,Inc. $49.16 Truck Pads
7657 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $310.00 Lab Services
7658 Tustin Dodge $296,03 Truck Pads
7659 Ultro Scientific $65.00 Lab Supplies
7660 Unitce ConsuHing Engineers $20,000,00 Professional Services
7661 Union Bank of Cal.Gov`.Services $2,970.91 Account Analysis
7662 The Unisoures Corporation $9.086.02 Office Supplies
7663 United Parcel Service $538.44 Parcel Services
7564 United States Fitter Corp. $1,262.75 Lab Supplies
7665 Valley CHles Supply Company $3,387.29 Plumbing Supplies
7666 Van Waters&Rogers Inc. $1.651.60 Chemicals
7667 Voxon Corp.and DeAd Medellin $1.922.05 Employee Computer Loan Program
7668 VAR Scientific Products $9,865.16 Lab Supplies
7669 The Wackenhut Corporation $11,901.12 Contract Service-Security Guards
7670 The Wall Street Journal $322.17 Subscription
7671 Waste Markets $9,325.42 Residuals Removal MO 3-27-96
7672 Water Education Foundation $35.32 Subscription
7673 Water Envlronmem Federation $81.25 Seminar Reglatrabon
7674 Waterman Supply Co.,Inc $431.00 Chain
7675 Western Business Systems $528.63 Payroll Check Stock
f' 1676 Weslem Eternfs Inc. $2,150.00 Construction-Stucco HR Building
m 7677 Western Health Services $4,770.00 Professional Services
l 7678 Western Industrial Supply $811.98 Tool Boxes
7679 Wilmington Instrument Co.,Inc $143.38 Equipment Repair
7680 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $1,857.50 Professional Services
7681 WW Grainger Inc. $991.86 Compressor Parts
7682 Xerox Corporation $9.870.33 Copier Leases
7683 Zymadk Corporation $7,000.00 Lab Equipment
7684 Jose C.Ambriz $399.45 Expense Reimb.
7685 Layne T.Baroldi $163.90 Expense Relmb.
7686 Michael A.Bemis $2,181.94 Employee Computer Loan Program
7687 Howard P.Lembke,Jr $1,320.84 Expense Reimb.
7688 Raymond Navaao $132.75 Expense Reimb.
7688 Fred J.OBrien $1,040.27 Expense Reimb.
7690 County of Orange $3,225.00 Administmtive Fees
7691 County Sanitation District of $1,142.65 Petty Cash Reimb.
7692 Donna Anderson,Larry Anderson $190,000.00 Newpnr Spill Claim Settlement NO 8.27-97
7693 CWEA $170.00 Conference Registration
7694 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. $2.231.27 Fame Chloride MO 9-27-95
7695 Roland T.McReynolds $578.57 Expense Reimb.
7696 Santa Fe Beg Co.,Inc. $840.45 Polypropylene Bags
7697 Schwin9 America,Inc. $61.71 Pump Pars
7698 Sejal Patel $203.67 Expense Reimb.
Total Claims Paid 10/29/97 $4,291,640.17
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 1029/97
Summary Amount
District No.1 $780.43
District No.2 $1,740.59
District No.3 $7.571.73
District No.5 $197.299.00
District No.11 5397.96
CORP $2,280.775.96
Self Insurance Funds $311.260.02
Joint Operations $1,511.814.40
$4.291,640.17
Y
rt
p1
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date roI si
01/28/98 �(�
AGENDA REPORT Item Number It N}tp,be,
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Y
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Communications
Originator: Ross H. Tipps, Senior Accounting Clerk
SUBJECT: Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Ratify Payment of Claims of the Joint and Individual Districts by Roll Call Vote.
(Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same
for each district represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently
for any District).
Staff recommends ratification of payment of claims in accordance with the attached
check listing.
SUMMARY
See attached check listing.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: N/A)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
N/A
X:1uy.EleVnITNIgpa,RpvM.0.ev"FmnbN
R.„..a. vsge Page f
CEQA FINDINGS
T
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
Copies of Claims Paid reports from 11/12/97 and 11/26197.
H:M ft�H�F-
R.w 1e Page 2
County Sanitation Districts or orange County -
Claims Paid 11/12/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Gesaipllon
7724 Blo Gro Division $26,815.72 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95
7725 County Of Orange $33.834.00 Digital Base Maps Of Smaids
7726 Dell Marketing L.P. $51,630.94 Computers
7727 Delta Dental $39,055.41 Dental Insurance Plan
7728 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $85,877.57 Natural Gas
7729 DP Mechanical $39,360.00 Data Alm Air Conditioning Unt
7730 FMC Corporation-Chemical Products, $67.012.38 Hydrogen Peroxide MO 9.14.94
7731 Glerlich-Michell, Inc $33,769.74 Pump Pads
7732 Kenumn Pacific,Inc. $54,707.92 Ferric Clodde MO 9-27-95
7733 Parker Diving Services,Inc. $63,012.00 Inspection Services MO 3.21-97
77M Pima Gm Systems Inc $54.552.70 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95
7735 Southern California Edison $345.777.00 Power
7736 Southern California Edison $73.830.92 Power
7737 American Telephone B Telegraph-Megacam $3.332.19 Long Distance Telephone Services
7738 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $11.95 Long Distance Telephone Services
7739 American Telephone&Telegraph-Pro Walla $843.30 Long Distance Telephone Services
T740 A-Plus Systems $859.56 Notices&Ada
7741 Air cad supply $87.75 Air Conditioner Repose
7742 Air Conditioning Specialties $165.27 Filter Adhesive
7743 Air Liquids America Corporation $518.73 Specialty Gasses
7744 Allied Supply Co. $5,109.53 Mechanical Parts
7745 American Airlines $11,035.75 Travel Services
7746 American Digital Technologies $3.426.55 Software
7747 Anthony Pest Control,Ina $215.00 Service Agreement
7748 Appleone Employment Service $3,070.50 Temporary Employment Services
7749 Applied Industrial Technology $354.14 Pump Paris
7750 Aquatic Testing Laboratories $3,000.00 Lob Analysis
7751 Arizona Instrument $987.18 Instrument Supplies
7752 Awards&Trophies By Bea $213.61 Plaques
7753 Assoc of Metro Sewerage Agencies $16,295.00 Membership
7754 AWSI $229.D0 D.O.T.Training Program
7755 Balley Fleeter&Porter Company $3.39 Chlorination Supplies
7755 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $1,699.85 Printing MO 11-7-94
7757 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $6,306.24 Telephone Installation
T758 Barclays Law Publishers $110.09 Publications
7759 Benz Engineering,Inc. $175.24 Compressor Pads
7760 Billings Industries $775.00 Maria Monitoring Supplies
7761 Brawn And Caldwell $3,021.67 Engineering Services Ras 93-101
7762 Budget Janitorial, Inc. $3,086.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94
7763 Bus&Associates Inc. $836.00 Surveying Senlcas MO 625-97
7764 Colt Dept Of Transportation $55.00 Publications
7755 California Environmental Controls $766.82 Mechanical Pads
7766 Caloympic Safety $3.476.99 Safety Supplies
7767 Carrel,Inc. $1,087.40 Hardware
7768 Canes Corporation $2.514.03 Fiber Optic Cable
7769 Capitol Weakly $149.00 Subscription
County Sanitation Districts Or orange County
Claims Paid 11H2/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7770 Carollo Engineers $8.688.60 Engineering Services J-33-2
7771 Catapult Inc. $5,288.00 OnSite Training
7772 Canlrepointe Commerdal Interiors $1.064.57 Office Furniture
7773 Cerrnat $20.00 Computer Services
7774 The City Associalee,Inc. $0,687.50 Hearing Officer Services
7775 Cale-Panner Instrument Company $72.08 Lab Supplies
7776 Computers Amedce,Inc. $2.020.41 Computer Supplies
7777 Con-Way Western Express $76.53 Freight
7776 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $7.631.73 Electric Parts
7779 Consolidated Reprographics $362.44 Printing Services
7780 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co $207.57 Plumbing Supplies
7781 Continental-McLaughlin $438.29 Tools
7782 Cooper Cameron Corporation $502.64 Engine Paris
7783 Core Laboratories,Inc $400.00 Soils Testing
7784 Corporate Express $4,922.93 Office Supplies
7785 County Wholesale Electric Co. $2.994.33 Electric Parts
7786 Crane Pro Services $2,046.50 Crane Paris
7787 Wilbur Cddlebaugh $176.00 Insurance Premium Refund
7788 Culligan Water $28.00 Soft Water Service
7789 CCI Technologies $2.063.00 Remove Data Cables
7790 CS Company $1,273.83 Plumbing Supplies
7791 CWEA $475.00 Seminar Registration
7792 Day&Nile Door Service Inc. $2,187.50 Door Installation
7793 Diamond H Rocegn8lon $127.25 Service Awams
7794 Dickson Inc, $2.702.00 Construction Services
T795 Dunn.Ecwards Corporation $422.81 Paint Supplies
7796 Dycerp USA,Inc. $478.17 Truck Pane
7797 DGA Consultants,Inc. $12.644.78 Surveying Services MO B-8-94
7796 DME,Inc. $50.00 Compressor Paris
7799 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. $60.00 Medical Screening
7800 Electra-Band $404.06 Equipment Repair
7801 Emergency Management Natwmk $2,007.50 CPR/First Aid Training
7802 Enchanter,Inc. $3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95
7803 Enlightened Leadership International $399.00 Seminar Registration
7804 Environmental Resources Association $2.282.80 Lab Services
7805 Federal Express $861.50 Air Freight
7806 Fitter Supply Company $3.726.77 Filler,
7807 Flat and Vertical,Inc. $152.00 Concrete Cu81ng
7808 Forked Engineering&Surveying $7,726.30 Engineering Services MO 6-25.97
7809 Fountain Valley Camera $51D.44 Photo Supplies
7810 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. $308.17 Paint Supplies
7811 Founded Valley Rancho Auto Wash $825.52 Truck Wash Tickets
7812 Franklin Quest Co. $114.58 Office Supplies
7813 Freeway Sales and Service $198.62 Office Equipment
7814 Ganahl Lumbar Company $73.43 Lumber/Hardware
7815 GarrattCallahan Company $2.881.24 Chemicals
4'
r
County Sanitallon Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 11/12/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7816 GTE California $1,802.58 Telephone Services
7817 Getinge Castle $936.00 Lab Supplies
7518 Government Institutes Inc. 585.00 Publication
7819 Graphic Distributors $505.35 Photographic Supplies
7820 Graseby STI $785.67 Engine Parts
7821 The Great American Printing Co $420.08 Printing Services
7822 Greet Western Sanitary Supplies $397.90 Jandorlal Supplies
7823 The Hacienda $399.35 Executive Management Retreat Expense
7824 Herrington Industrial Plastics $63.48 Plumbing Supplies
7825 Hilti Inc $7,898.31 Tools
7826 Hoerbiger Service Inc $244.64 Compressor Parts
7827 Home Depot $68.21 Small Hardware
7828 City of Huntington Beach $13,416.41 Water Use
7829 J.P.Nissen Cc $42.56 Office Supplies
7830 Jamison Engineering,Ina. $2.927.50 Consirectlon Services
7831 Jay's Catering $352.34 Directors'Meeting Expense
7832 Jendham, Inc. $845.00 Seminar Registration
7833 Johnstone Supply $138.20 Electric Parts
78U Keith D Stolzenbach,PH.D.,P. $16,900.00 Ocean Monitoring
7835 Kennedy Hydraulics $919.11 Motor Repairs
7836 Kaye Productivity Canter $125.00 Seminar Registration
7837 Knox Industrial Supplies $2.625.53 Tools
7838 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company $2,150,43 Cellular Telephone Service
7839 Labware Inc. $60D.00 Training Registration
7840 LaserAll Corporation $2.435.72 Service Agreement
7841 Law/Crandall $6,278.50 Sell Testing MO 7-13-94
7842 Leadership Directories $637.00 Subscription
7943 Leadership Directed" $1,210.30 Subscriptions
7844 Manhole Adjusting $6,305.00 Sewer Repairs
7845 Mar Vac Electronics $14.10 Instrument Supplies
7846 Me Junkin Corp $100.09 Plumbing Supplies
7847 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $926.69 Tools
7848 Measurement Variables,Inc. $1,265.08 Fillers
7849 Mee Analytical System $4.743.00 Ocean Monitoring
7850 Medlin Controls Co. $50.96 Instrument Supplies
7851 Mellon Trust $14,977.31 Investment Custodian Bank
7852 Mllltronics Inc $859.01 Electric Supplies
7853 Mission Uniform Service $2,239.15 Uniform Rentals
7854 Mobile Modular Management Corp $344.80 Office Trailer Lease
7855 MotePhoto $13.54 Photographic Services
7856 MPS Photographic Services,Inc $98.61 Photographic Services
7857 National Microcomp Services $3,370.00 Maintenance Agreement
7858 New Horizons Computer Learning $2.000.00 OnSBe Training
7859 City of Newport Beach $125.18 Water Use
7860 Omni Western Incorporated $76 98 Tools
7861 Optio Software $1.65774 Professional Services
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 11/12197
Check No. Vendor Amount Descdptlon
7862 Orange County Fame Supply Co. $21.24 Chemicals
7863 Oxygen Service Company $4,328.39 Specialty Gases
7864 Pacific Bell $29.98 Telephone Services
7865 Pacific Mechanical Supply $1.346.40 Plumbing Supplies
7866 Pacific Pads and Controls,Inc. $1,034.02 Instrument Supplies
7867 Parkhouse Tire Inc $311.89 Truck Tires
7868 Petce Animal Supplies $104.20 Lab Supplies
7869 Photoron U.S.A.,Inc. $392.00 Lab Supplies
7870 Polypum.Inc.&/or Polydyne $23.071.51 Cationic Polymer MO 3A 1.92
7871 Power Machine Co. $563.15 Pump Parts
7872 Red Wing Shoes $122.40 Reimbursable Safety Shoes
7873 Reish Marina Studies,I.e. $320.00 Ocean Monitoring
7874 Remedy $16,193.45 Temporary Employment Services
7875 RPM Electric Motors $1.713.13 Electric Molar Parts
7876 S&J Supply Co Inc $751.49 Pump Parts
7877 Sancon Engineering,Inc. $6,85D.00 Engineering Services
7878 Science Applications Intl.,Co $3,601.53 Ocean Monitoring MO 68-94
7879 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $256.50 Specially Gases
7880 SemndSun $709.15 Light Factures
7881 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $2.025.37 Tools/Hardware
7882 Sigma Aldrich,Inc. $168.48 Lab Supplies
7883 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. $469.84 Plumbing Supplies
7884 South Coast Air Quality Mngt. $171.90 Permit Fees
7885 South Coast Water $125.00 Lab Supplies
7886 Southern California Water $85.56 Water Use
7887 Southwest Scientific Inc. $1,149.15 Meter
7888 Spading Instrument Co..Inc. $4.764.49 Meter
7889 Standard and Poors Corp. $2,500.00 COP Contract Service
7890 Slate Chemical Mfg.Co. $342.09 Lube Oil
7891 Corporate Trust $5,795.50 COP Trustee Services
7892 Sunset Ford $93.27 Truck Pans
7893 SWRCB Accounting Office $10.000.00 Annual Permit
7894 Texas Commerce Bank National Association $6,371.12 COP Trustee Services
7895 The Register $793.80 Notices&Ads
7896 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $2,558.76 Mechanical Pads
7897 Time Motion Tools $84.60 Electric Parts
7898 Time Warner Communications $86.22 Cable Services
7899 Aemfund Financial/Top Hat Productions $125.37 Directors'Meeting Expense
7900 Tropical Plane Nursery,Inc. $3,973.84 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94
7901 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $36.62 Truck Pads
7902 Michelle Tuchman $128.39 Expense Raimb.
7903 TCH Associates,Inc. $3,451.80 Water Sampler Bolles
7904 United Concrete Companies $312.08 Concrete
7905 United Parcel Service $28.82 Parcel Services
7906 Valley Cites Supply Company $5,053.90 Plumbing Supplies
7907 Vlllalobos&Associates $895.18 Engineering Services
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 11112J97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7908 VWR Scientific Products $1,330.24 Lab Supplies
7909 The Wackenhut Corporation $2,975.28 Contract Service-Security Guards
7910 The Wall Street Journal $23.17 Subscription
7911 Waste Markets $12,080.76 Residuals Removal MO 3.27-96
7912 Wesco Distribution Inc. $1,216.45 Instrumem Supplies
7913 Western States Chemical Inc. $12,091.47 Caustic Soda MO B-23-95
7914 WCS Distributing $1.665.73 Bleach Tank Repair
7915 Xerox Corporation $2.718.84 Copier Leases
7916 Blake Anderson $99.00 Expense Reimb.
7917 Nicholas J.Arhontes $958.37 Expense Reimb.
7918 JLisa Carlson $214.53 Expense Reimb.
7919 David P.Halvorson $287.65 Expense Reimb.
7920 Vladimir A.Kogan $820.70 Expense Refmb.
7921 DaVM A.Ludwln $1,489.30 Expense Reimb.
7922 Kathleen T.Mlllea $295.00 Expense Relmb.
7923 Michael D.Moore $587.75 Expense Relmb.
7924 Samuel L.Mowbray $184.47 Expense Relmb.
7925 Michael L.Peterman $248.44 Expense Reimb.
7926 Douglas M.Stewart $1,739.50 Expense Reimb.
7927 Robert C.Thompson $376.43 Expense Reimb.
7928 Edward M.Torres $733.69 Expanse Reimb.
7929 Compuxpmss And Cad Hemgstad $1,152.06 Employee Computer Loan Program
7930 Compuxpross And Henry Lorimer $2,021.05 Employee Computer Loan Program
7931 Compuxpmu And Patrick Bourdy $1,997.98 Employee Computer Loan Program
7932 County of Orange $1,950.00 Administrative Fees
7933 County Sanitation Distdct of OC $907.66 Petry Cash Relmb.
7934 PC ClubSeuth Coast And Dionne Kerdos $3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
7935 State Chemical Mfg.Co. $125.96 Oil
Total Claims Paid 11I12J97 $1.444.665.32
Summary Amount
District No.2 $6,311.14
District No.7 $6,162.22
CORP $147.119.96
Joint Operations $1,285,072.00
$1,444,665.32
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 1126197
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
7957 Blo Oro Division $25,302.27 Residuals Removal MO 4-20-95
7958 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $280,730.00 Engineering Services
7959 Carollo Engineers $66,805.52 Engineering Services J-33.2
7950 Coach&Sons Inc.,DBA Collch $41.374.18 Construction 11-17-1
7961 County of Orange $1,264,708.23 Special Assessment User Fees Overpayment
7902 Kemlron Pacific,Inc. $70.314.08 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95
7963 Orange County Water District $50,479.20 GAP Water Use MO 10-23.98
7964 Pima Gro Systems Inc $98,165.24 Residuals Removal NO 3.29-95
7965 Science Applications Intl.,Co $111.741.88 Ocean Monitoring MO S-8-94
7988 Southern California Edison $49.983.68 Power
7967 Tub RanchlMagan Farms $93.881.18 Residuals Removal
7968 Vulcan Chemical Technologies $120,788.74 Hydrogen Peroxide Specification No,C-0
7969 Western Stales Chemical Inc. $29,529.53 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95
7970 Woodruff.Sprodlin&Small $61,056.57 Legal Services NO 7.26-95
7971 Advanco Constructors Inc $418,994.10 Construction J-34-1,P2-35.5
7972 Alrpol Construction,Inc. S62,973.38 Construction PI-51R
7973 Margate Construction Inc. $2.172.084.74 Construction PI-36-2
7914 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $242.487.00 Construction P2.35.3,PI-38-5,P246,P2-55
7975 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $14.40 Long Distance Telephone Services
7975 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $4.30 Lang Distance Telephone Services
79" A411us Systems E2,187.42 Notioea&Ads
7978 Air Products and Chemicals,Inc. $22.500.00 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen.Syst.MO 841-69
7979 Abboume Express $29.25 Air Freight
7980 American Management Association $290.00 Seminar Registration
7981 American Sigma,Inc. $975.70 Mechanical Supplies
7982 Appleone Employment Service $2,050.49 Temporary Employment Services
7083 Applied Industrial Technology $31.54 Pump Pads
7984 Aquatic Bloassay And Consulting $235.00 Lab Supplies
7985 Aquatic Center $40.00 Air Tanks
7986 Aquatic Testing Laboratories E4,000.00 Lab Analysis
7987 AIkINJones Computer Services S642.60 Service Agreement
7988 Auto Club of Southern CaiOomla $1,503.33 Claim Settlement
7988 Awards&Trophies By Bea $124.36 Plaques
7990 ARK Technologies $5.720.00 Professional Services
7991 ASTD Publishing Service $48.00 Publication
7992 Balance Consulting,Inc. 533&00 Seminar Regislmtion
7993 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $5,079.30 Telephone Installation
7994 Barclays Law Publishers $99.00 Publication
7995 Somas&Noble Books $3,840.17 Subscription
7996 BbMerleux Vitek,Inc. $1.488.00 Lab Supplies
7997 Brown And Caldwell $705.51 Engineering Services Res 93-101
7995 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $520.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94
7999 Bureau of National Affalre $1,646.50 Software
8000 Cal-Glass.Inc. $37.72 Lab Supplies
e001 California Relocation Services $242.50 File Moving Services
8002 Catapult Inc. E4.0g0.00 On-Sae Computer Training
County Sensation Districts Of Orange Count'
Claims Paid 11/26/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8003 Centrepolnte Commercial lnterom $6.097.15 Office Furniture
8004 Capp Corp $4,323.83 Safety Supplies
8005 Chapman Counseling $8,200.00 Employee Training
BODE Chrome Crankshaft Co. $50.00 Pump Paris
8007 City of Fountain Valley $860.00 Water Use
8008 Clayton Environmental Consultants $2,214.26 Professional Services
SODS Closson B Closson $1,610.50 Landscape Construction Management
8010 Coast Fhe Equipment 1106.59 Service Agreement
8011 Communications Performance Group $23.918.40 Professional Services
8012 Compuserve Incorporated $992.90 Computer Services
8013 Conunamal-Mclaughlln $433.81 Tools
8014 Cooper Cameron Corpomllon $11,377.55 Engine Pads
8015 Core Laboratories,Inc $800.00 Soils Testing
8016 Corporate Express $1.047.58 Office Supplies
$017 County of Orange $9,442.34 Municipal Radio Services
8018 County Sanitation Districts of OC $24.539.76 Workers Comp Relmb.
8019 Culligan Water $28.00 Soft Water Service
8020 CCI Technologies 5880.00 Remove Data Cables
8021 D S S Conveyors $570.00 Equipment Repair
8022 Datavaull $110.00 Oibite Back-Up Tape Storage
8023 David E.Uloart,Ph.D. $1,750.00 Management Training
8024 De Guelle 8 Sons Oleos Co. $283.44 Safety Glass
8025 Dal Mar Analytical $760.00 Slosolids Analysis
8026 Dail Marketing L.P. $15,558.93 Computers
8027 Diamond H Ramgnillon $05.12 Service Awards
8028 Dlatedch-Post $532.01 Clamps
8029 Dover Elevator Company $3.441.00 Elevator Maintenance
8030 Dunn-Edwards Corporation $1.724.60 Palm Supplies
8031 Duthie Generator Service,Inc. $12.800.00 Equipment Rental
8032 DGA Consultants,Inc. $8.716.00 Surveying Services MO 64494
$033 DME,Inc. $B81.29 Compressor Parts
8034 Electra Band,Inc. $888.94 Equipment Repair
8035 Emergency Management NeWork $720.00 CPR First Aid Training
8036 Enchanter,Inc. 54,200.DO Oman Monitoring MO 524.95
8037 Environmental Resources Association $1,274.10 Lab Servima
8038 Envision Of Irvine And Chad"Reed $1.375.10 Employee Computer Loan Program
8039 Experian $117.92 Orange County Property Information
8040 ENS Resources,Inc $1.181.01 Professlonal Services
8041 Fairbanks Scabs,Inc. $1.600.00 Service Agreement
8042 Federal Express $606.00 Air Freight
8043 Fibemon $383.49 Fiber Optic Cable
8044 Fisher Scientific $6,219.14 Lab Supplies
8045 Flo-Systems,Inc $1.063.52 Pump Pads
8046 Forked Engineering B Surveying $4.928.50 Engineering Services MO 6-25-97
OD47 Richards Capital Corporation $850.00 Office Supplies
8048 Fortis Benefits Insurenm Comp $8.469.45 Disability finumnm Premiums Oct 97
County Sanitation Dishicts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 11/26/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8049 City of Fountain Valley $11,842.32 Water Use
8050 Frazee Paint and Wallcovering $332.95 Paint Supplies
6051 Fry's Electronics $21.54 Electronic&Computer Supplies
8052 The Gas Company $20.892.35 Natural Gas
8053 Gauge Repair Service $195.00 Equipment Repair
6054 General Petroleum $17,043./g Unleaded Gasoline
W55 GTE California $6,044.68 Telephone Services
8056 Goldenwest Window Service $1,656.01D Window Cleaning Service
$057 Great Pacific Equipment Co. $1,346.88 Creme Rental
8058 Guy L.Warden&Sons $474.72 Compressor Pads
8059 Edwards Systems Technology $1,462.50 Service Agreement
8060 Hooker Equipment Company $1,892.00 Truck Pads
W61 Harold Primrose Ice $48.0D Ice For Samples
8062 Harrington Industrial Plastics $205.60 Plumbing Supplies
8063 Hatch&Kirk Inc. $840.45 Truck Paris
6064 Hautsway Storage Containers $1.035.00 Container Rentals
8065 Herb's Bladdorest Bakery&Dell $40.05 Directors'Meeting Expense
8066 Hersey Measurement Company $547.06 Equipment Repair
8057 HIM Inc $359.35 Tools
8068 Holmes&Narver Inc $4,342.29 Engtn%dng Services
8069 Home Depot $624.19 Small Hardware
8070 Honba Instruments Inc $1,557.12 Electric Paris
8071 Hub Auto Supply $202.10 Truck Pads
8072 Hughes Aircraft Co. $3,446.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
8073 HI Standard Automotive $77.58 Truck Parts
8074 Indusmal Hearing&Pulmonary $3,195.00 Audlometdc&Pulmonary Testing Of Employees
8075 Industrial Threaded Products, $2,963.82 Connectors
8076 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $199.45 Lab Supplies
8077 Interstate Battery Systems 5658.69 Batteries
8078 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $47.46 Water Use
8079 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $1,091.47 Instrument Parts
8080 Jays Catering $829.80 Directors'Meeting Expense
8081 Jim's Suspension Servka $25.00 Truck Repairs
8D82 Johnstone Supply $1.839.22 Electric Pads
8083 Kelly Paper $776.45 Paper
Bogs Kennedy Hydraulics $4,181.39 Motor Repairs
8085 Kewaunee SUentlBC Corporatlon $15,834.92 Office Furniture
8056 Knox Industrial Supplies $4,798.30 Tools
8087 Labware Inc. $750.00 Consulting Services MO 2-26-97
8088 Law/Crandall $2,360.00 Soil Testing 7-13-94
5089 Loral Agency Formation Commission $5.000.00 CSDOC Consolidation Review Fee
8090 Ludolph T.Lommer $206.23 Electric Parts Rehnb.
8091 Las Angeles Galvanizing Company $161.63 Steal
8092 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $1,364.08 Tools
8093 Medlin Controls Co. $423.29 Instrument Supplies
8D94 Micmlac Laboratories,Inc. $720.00 Gas Analysts
4
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange Count' `
Claims Paid I IrA 87
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8095 Midway Mfg 0 Machining Cc $4.099.61 Mechanical Repairs
80% MIIIIronics Inc $1,480A4 Electric Supplies
8097 Mission Uniform Servlca $3.708.99 Unform Rentals
8098 Mitchell Repair Information Co $550.51 Instrument
8099 MoloPhoto $55.65 Photographic Services
8100 MPS Photographic Services,Inc $222.90 Photographic Services
8101 Nat West Markets $1.250.00 COP Interest Draw Fees
8102 National Information Data Center $48.90 Publication
8103 National Research Council Canada $174.00 Publication
8104 New Pig $825.84 Generator Pads
8105 Nickey Petroleum Cc Inc $633.88 Lubricants
8106 Norcal Controls Incorporated $468.57 Instrument Pads
8107 NC AWWAIWEA $100.00 Conference Registration
8108 Office Depot Business Services S4,055.10 Office Supplies
8109 Optio Schwan, $210.00 Software
8110 Orange County Industrial Plastics $2,950.00 Plastic Sheets
8111 Orange County Red Cross $78.00 Safety Training
8112 Orange Courier $20.70 Courier Services
8113 Oxygen Service Company $3,229.91 Specialty Gases
8114 OCV Control Valves $185.19 Valve Pads
8115 P.L.Hawn Company Inc. $10,281.89 Electric Supplies
8116 Pacific Bell $85.15 Telephone Services
8117 Peclhc Mechanical Supply $5,499.00 Plumbing Supplies
8118 Pacific Pads and Controls,Inc $9.502.26 Instrument Parts
8119 Padgett-Thompson $139.00 Seminar Registration
8120 Padre Janitorial Supplies $887.21 Janitorial Supplies
8121 Pak West $17.12 Janitorial Supplies
8122 Parkhouse Tire Inc $319.13 7Ires
8123 Pads Unlimited $799.55 Truck Pads
8124 Panay Bowes $323.00 Postage Machine Service Agreement
8125 Polypum,Inc.Wor Polydyne,Inc. $24,405.60 Canonic Polymer MO 3.11-92
8126 Prentice Hell Wor Simon B Schuster $84.52 Publication
8127 Pryor Resources,Inc. $267.00 Seminar Registration
8128 Reahlme Systems Corporation $1.341.12 Consulting Services
8129 Rellastar $8,330.00 Life Insurance Premium
8130 Remedy $4,201.87 Temporary Employment Services
8131 Adders Rene.cu $1.397.72 Expense Reimb.
8132 Rosen's Electrical Equipment Co. $2,190.51 Electric Pads
6133 Ryon Herco Products Corp. $1,426.68 Pump Pads
8134 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. $211.62 Paint Supplies
8135 Safety-Kleen $153.50 Equipment Repair
8136 Scantech,Inc $2,500.00 Sewer System Atlas
8137 Schwing America,Inc. $539.47 Pump Pads
8138 Sean $738.24 Freezer Pert.
8139 Service Were Inc. $200.00 Seminar Registration
8140 Shureluck Sales 6 Engineering $711.15 Tools I Hardware
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County
Claims Paid 1V26197
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8141 Snap-On Incorporated $882.09 Tools
8142 Southern California Air Cond. $462.12 Compressor Pads
8143 Southern California Marine Institute $1,930.00 Rental Equipment
81" Spiveco Inc. $1,443.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
8145 Sprint $32.10 Telephone Services
8146 Starnimd Inc. $16,02588 Computer
8147 Stanford Video Media Group $524.27 Training Videos
8148 State Board Of Equalization $199.08 Underground Petroleum Storage Fee
8149 Statexlet $165.00 Seminar Registration
8150 Summit Steel $1,987.25 Metal
8151 Sunset Ford $52.82 Truck Parts
8152 SARSS-CWEA $28.00 Conference Registration
8153 Technomic Publishing Company $144.95 Publication
8154 The Holman Group $T72.48 EAP Premium Oct 97
8155 Thomas Grey B Associates,Inc. $330.00 Safety Testing
8156 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $17,760.84 Mechanical Parts
8157 Tidepool Scientific Software $654.50 Software
8158 Trenchless Technology $350A0 Seminar Registration
8159 Tropial Plaza Nursery,Inc. $12.079.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94
8160 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. $635.78 Truck Parts
8161 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $3.245.60 Lab Services
8162 TCH Associates,Inc. $988.72 Lab Supplies
8163 TWComcorp Communications Supplies $3,167.10 Telephone Equipment
8164 U.S.Filler $1.252.75 Lab Supplies
8165 U.S.Postal Service $5,000.00 Postage
8166 United Concrete Companies $318.33 Concrete
8167 United Parcel Service $755.15 Parcel Services
8168 UnWmfty of Nevada,Las Vegas $750.00 Seminar Registration
8169 Vako Instruments Co.Ina $329.24 Valve Parts
8170 Valley C8les Supply Company $3,016.08 Plumbing Supplies
8171 Van Waters B Rogers Inc. $3,636.56 Chemicals
8172 Vertex Business Systems $1,350.00 Computer Data Support
8173 Village Nurseries $42.01 Landscaping Supplies
8174 VWR Scientific Products $2.526.16 Lab Supplies
8175 W.D.Prow Company $181.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund
8176 The Wackenhut Corporation $5,976.19 Contract Service-Security Guards
0177 WIN Grainger Inc. $3,735.07 Compressor Parts
8178 Xerox Corporation $1,147.00 Copier Leases
8179 Moyasar T.Yehya $1,198.95 Expense Reimb.
8180 Blake Anderson $83.18 Expanse Reimb.
8181 Mark Castile $1.220.10 Expense Reimb.
8182 Gregory R.Mathews $494.56 Expense Reimb.
8183 Chad"D.McGee $180.83 Expense Reimb.
8184 Donald F.McIntyre $69.62 Expense Reimb.
8185 Dawn M.McXinley $2,175.00 Seminar Registration Reimb.
aim Christopher M.Pelletier $859.45 Expense Relmb.
aC' .,
County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County a
Claims Paid 11/26/97
Check No. Vendor Amount Description
8187 Edward M.Tones $239.04 Expanse Relmb.
8180 William F.Webster,Jr $476.45 Expense Relmb.
8189 Nancy J.Wheatley $1.276.26 Expense Relmb.
8190 Charles F.Winter $1.987.74 Expense Reimb.
8191 County of Orange $1.020.00 Administrative Fees
8192 County of Orange $945.00 Administrative Foes
3193 County Sanitation District of OC $1.720.48 Petty Cash Relmb.
8194 Sllican Ave Ine.Comptr.and Randy Harris $1.175.00 Employee Computer Loan Program
8195 Fortis Benefits Insurance Comp $9,190.97 Disability Insurance Premiums
8196 polestar $4,627.48 Life Insurance Premium
8197 Southern California Edison $6,255.20 Power
8198 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. $60.00 Traffic Grate
8199 Ousters Map Stand $452.55 Thomas Bum.Wall Maps
8200 Diehl,Evans&Co.,LLP $375.00 Seminar Registration
8201 Padgett-Thompson $139.00 Seminar Registration
8202 Reliaslar $8,153.06 Like Insurance Premium
8203 Merin Telebl $1.098.55 Expense Relmb.
8207 Slemon,Larsen&Moral, $8,000.00 Professional Services
Total Claims Paid 11/26/97 $5.875.208.58
Summary Amount
District No.2 $1,625.63
District No.3 $8,715.00
District No.6 $3,446.43
District No.7 $35.00
District No. 11 $41,374.16
CORE $3,185,772.58
Self Insurance Funds $26,043.09
Joint Operations $2,608.126.69
$5,875,208.58
JOINT BOARDS Meetng Date I ToR.ads
.
01/28/98 01/28/97
AGENDA REPORT Itern Number ]tep Wymber
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California �1
FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
Originator: Terri Josway, Manager of Safety and Emergency Response
SUBJECT: Designation of Applicant's Agent Resolution for obtaining Federal and
State financial assistance
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt attached State Office of Emergency Services Resolution for the purpose of
obtaining federal and/or state financial assistance.
SUMMARY
On December 10, 1997, Governor Wilson proclaimed a State of Emergency in Orange
County as a result of the damage caused by the winter stones and flooding that
impacted Orange County beginning on December 6. The State of Emergency
Proclaimation entitles public entities, such as the Districts, to file for federal and/or state
financial assistance for damage and emergency response costs. On December 6,
1997, the Districts activated the Emergency Operations Center, responded to storm-
related incidents, and removed storm-related debris from various Districts facilities.
No significant damage to Districts facilities has been found, however, costs incurred for
emergency response and debris removal will be submitted to the State Office of
Emergency Services (OES) for financial assistance. A Federal Declaration of a State of
Emergency for the December 6, 1997 storm was not declared, therefore, the Districts
will be eligible to receive only 75% of the emergency response and debris removal costs
over$2,500.
The Districts must designate the titles of individuals authorized to act on the behalf of
the Districts to obtain certain federal financial assistance under P.L. 93-288 and/or state
financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Act. This Resolution will
authorize the General Manager, Director of Human Resources, and Manager of Safety
and Emergency Response to work with OES in order to receive state disaster financial
assistance. This Designation will be valid for the December 6, 1997 storm and all future
State Proclaimations and Federal Declarations of State of Emergencies.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
There are no project costs.
6NIyaE.MgM.orM RpnlNbnl BwaCU19e pm ewro,SEA I.wNm ln�Orcm
a.u..e ,ams, Page 1
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
® This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
The Districts will be eligible to receive 75% of the emergency response and debris
removal costs in excess of$2,500.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
N/A.
ALTERNATIVES
There are no cost effective alternatives. The Districts are required to complete the
Designation of Applicant's Agent Resolution to be eligible for federal and/or state
financial assistance. No action would prevent the Districts from recovering 75% of the
costs incurred, over$2,500, responding to the stone-related events and removing
debris.
CEOA FINDINGS
N/A.
ATTACHMENTS
Designation of Applicants Agent Resolution (OES Form 130)
DET:dt
Q:NIyMafMgMf DN PWnlf M BaeNV"0-1-01 SEP ned.un nvt tloe.6N
rv„�� Page 2
OFFICE OF
FA¢RCENCY SERVICE$
P.A. No.:
DESIGNATION OF
APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE OF THE
(Ooremlag Body) (Name of AW icanu
THAT OR
(ride of Ambod� Agin)
OR
(fNe ofAutdirmd Agm)
Rde of�Agent)
is hereby authorized to execute for and in behalf of the a public Entity
established under the laws of the State of California,this application and as file it in the Office of Emergency Services for the
purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance ander P.L.93-288 as amanded by the Robert T.Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988,and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Am
THAT the a public Entity established under the laws of the State of California,hereby
authors=its agent(s)to provide to the Stare Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such ante disaster
assistance the assurmccs and agreements required.
Passed and approved this day of 19_
(Name and TNe)
(Nmoc and Title)
(Name and rde)
CERTIFICATION
I, duly appointed and of
(IJamel (rde)
do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a
resclunon passed and approved by the of the on the
(4wming body) (Nam.of APPlicanu
day of 19_
Date:
(Oft,. 1 Posiuon)
(Siguaoee)
DES Fo- Mfloss DAD Fbm
a i Nn�R'OF
P.A. No.:
DESIGNATION OF / L- �
APPLICANTS AGENT RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Joint Hoards of pireet*W-THE .County Sanitation District$ of O.0
(Gunming Body) (NameofAPFliead)
THAT General Manager OR
(Tide of Am rood Agent)
Director of Bureau Resources OR
(rude of Authorized Agent)
Manager of Safety and Emergency Response
(fide oLAumomad Agent)
is hereby authorized to execute for and in behalfof the rnunry Senitation Districts of O.C.apublicemity
established under the laws of the State of California,this application and to file it in the Office of Emergency Services for the
purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance oodm P.L.93.299 as amended by the Roben T.Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988,and(or stare financial assistance under the Namml Diameter Assistance Act.
County Sanitation Districts of O.C.
THAT the a public entity established under the laws of the State of California,hereby
authorizes its ageat(s)to provide to the Smrc Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster
maismace the assurances and agreements required.
Passed and approved this 28th day of January . 1998
Patricia A. McGuigan, District No. 1 Chair
Moms and Me)
(Name and Tte)
(Nwe and Ttle)
CERTIFICATION
I. Penny Kyle .duly appointed and Board Secretary of
(Name) (rare)
County Sanitation Districts of O.C. ,do hereby cenifythat the above datme undcorrectcopy ofa
resolution passed and approved bythc Join[ Boardsrf Direq"Ics ty Sanitation Districts o�0he.
(Gmemtnp tally) (Name ofAppkno.)
28th _dayof January , i9. 98.
Use; January 29, 1998
Board Secretary
(OR ul yeoUnnl
r n
---
' lano �
oe,Rn�YM1n9"Gnrmm �+"�
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date Tox.aOe.
1/28/98 1/28/99
AGENDA REPORT Item Numbv Ite; yy by
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Originator: Cymantha Atkinson, Communications Officer
SUBJECT: LETTER TO IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT REGARDING
CSDOC CONSOLIDATION
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
To reaffirm the Districts' prior commitment to maintain all the terms and
conditions of all the current agreements among County Sanitation District 14, the
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the Irvine Ranch Water District;
and authorize the Joint Chairman to transmit letter regarding the CSDOC
consolidation commitment to the Irvine Ranch Water District.
SUMMARY
CSDOC has submitted an application to the Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO) to consolidate its nine sanitation districts into one agency.
During the application's review period, the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD)
raised concerns regarding the contracts and agreements that exist between
CSDOC, District 14 and IRWD, and between District 14 and the other existing
Districts. The attached letter to IRWD addresses those concerns by citing
provisions in the original application that ensure those contracts will be directly
transferred and held in full farce and effect.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
N/A
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
rv.e�w.miw,P.emmam.vaes,m.wncwvmneer,m aoenaiuwex
e�;w,. Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CSDOC has approached consolidation with the intent of transferring to the
consolidated District any and all duties or obligations, and maintaining all existing
contracts and agreements. As part of the application to LAFCO regarding
consolidation, the following language was included in the Terms & Conditions
that establish the parameters of the proposed consolidation.
To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as
necessary to carry out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine
Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those
relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer
facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect.
All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more
CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full
force and effect.
While aware of the application's provisions, IRWD officials maintained some
concem. Following a meeting between IRWD and CSDOC officials on 1/5198 to
discuss these issues, IRWD has requested further assurance that the
consolidation will not affect the existing contracts or agreements. The attached
letter, drafted by counsel, addresses those concerns and affirms CSDOC's
original intent of honoring and directly transferring to the consolidated District any
and all existing contracts and agreements. By transmitting the letter, we believe
IRWD's comments are responded to and their concerns will be satisfied. The
application is expected to go forward and be heard by LAFCO on February 11.
ALTERNATIVES
Transmitting this letter maintains the current schedule for consolidation, which
includes the application to LAFCO being heard at their February meeting. Any
other alternative would most likely involve further discussions with IRWD,
resulting in a longer review period and a delayed LAFCO hearing date. The
letter simply affirms the provisions of the current application, and it is the
recommended alternative.
CEOA FINDINGS
NIA
W�GmWY1M➢-CYW,inVl9uWnswKenvMGmEa Fe%rt 01]PHB.Rc
Page 2
ATTACHMENTS
Letter to Irvine Ranch Water District regarding CSDOC consolidation
csa
%\Conbe Ii AWWGrrtnO� nsanlWns gM ft Rero 012�Gac
nawd + Page 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
January 29, 1998
President Darryl Miller and
Members of the Board of Directors
ahO"' Irvine Ranch Water District
(714)962-2411
15600 Sand Canyon Avenue
n,wpng adder; Irvine, Ca. 92618-3102
P.D. B.8127
�n nVane✓.CA Dear President Miller and Members of the Board of Directors:
9272Ba12J
te°""®n
D9" The Board of Directors of each of the nine County Sanitation Districts of Orange
raur
1 44 al alis Avenue rceln vane,.ra County (collectively, "CSDOC'), at their regular meeting held January 28, 1998, formally
92708-1016 acted to reaffirm their commitment to the terns of all the current agreements between
Irvine Ranch Water District ('IRWD"), County Sanitation District No. 14, and CSDOC.
The Directors have asked me to advise you of this commitment, especially as these
terms relate to the pending consolidation of CSDOC. As you know, the nine Districts
Mambar have filed Applications with the Orange County Loral Agency Formation Commission to
A,.rm. consolidate into a single County Sanitation District, said Application being designated as
• DC97-30.
ce;aa
The Boards, and each of them, have, from the outset of our consolidation
a",area studies, given serious consideration to the long-standing relationship between the IRWD
Been,Par+ and CSDOC, because of the unique contractual arrangements that have their existence
Lyareae based on the formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 in 1985.
Fu.rwn vanes
Fda ...n
Hanungtun Beach CSDOC has agreed that all of the terms and provisions of the several
kvme agreements by and among the Joint Sanitation Districts, County Sanitation District No.
La Habra
Le Palma 14 and IRWD will continue to remain in full force and effect, and that all necessary
Loa Alamiws measures will be taken to perpetuate the terms of those agreements. CSDOC, in its
Newpar[Beech Application DC97-30, has requested LAFCO to approve the continuation of the
Dreac PP q PP
PJ.cenda substantive provisions of the agreements between IRWD and CSDOC.
Santa Me
Seat Beach Brenton We trust that this provides all of the necessary assurances to your District that a
Taaun continued successful relationship between our agencies will be realized and enjoyed
V
1 lla Park
ma urea beyond the consolidation of CSDOC.
County of orange
sannary Dl.g = John Collins
Costa Mesa Chairman, Joint Boards of Directors
Garden Grove
Midway car cc: CSDOC Boards of Directors
Water metrlals LAFCO Executive Officer
Irvine Panch
H:%WP.DTAW DMINOg0\TUCHMANUNTCHAIRURWD.WPD
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed w Protecting Me Environment Since 1954
r
70INT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS V128 0 0012 eas.
cll2e/se ol"-O'S
AGENDA REPORT HEM Number Item Numbv
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California
FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: 1997-98 Financing Plan
Inter-District Loan Agreements
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Districts 1 and 2 and Districts 3 and 11 District loan agreements, as
authorized last month, while the Strategic Plan is being completed and a long-
term financial plan is being prepared.
SUMMARY
At the December 1997, Joint Boards meeting, the Directors approved an inter-
District loan policy. This action is to implement that policy for Districts 1 and 2,
and 3 and 11. Borrowing was included in the FY 1997-98 Budgets for Districts 1
and 11. Districts 2 and 3 have sufficient accumulated funds to make these loans
in accordance with the newly approved policy.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
District No. 1 will receive $6.3 million from District No. 2, while District No. 11 will
receive $4.0 million from District No. 3. These funds will be repaid with interest
at the average rate eamed by the long-term portfolios, from proceeds of the next
COP issue.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted. (Line hem: District COP Funds)
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
0:NteleErMop p RKO W WKwnA,.is
RM 1M7W Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ,
N/A
ALTERNATIVES
Districts 1 and 11 could issue debt (COPS) in the financial market. This
alternative was discussed in the staff report supporting the December 1997.
action.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Agreements prepared by General Counsel.
GGS:SK:lc
G�0.sVuuTAHFLLwMYrwd
,m,W Page 2
y
AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR INTER-DISTRICT LOANS FOR
CAPITAL FACILITIES BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into, to be effective this_ day of
1998, by and between:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "District
No. 1",
AND
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "District
No. 2".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, District No. 1 and District No. 2 are each independent government
agencies and parties to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement,
effective July 1, 1985, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of said Joint Agreement, District No. 1 and
District No. 2 are each obligated to pay their respective proportionate share of all
operation and maintenance expenses incurred for the treatment and disposal of
wastewater, together with the capital cost of construction of facilities, and
WHEREAS, District No. 1 needs to borrow funds to pay its 1997-98 Fiscal Year
obligation to the Joint Funds; and
WHEREAS, District No. 2 has funds which are presently not necessary for
meeting its financial obligations to the Joint Funds for Fiscal Year 1997-98; and
RW:pj:Dafl No.1:01a157
No.5755 1
v
WHEREAS, District No. 1 wishes to borrow, and District No. 2 wishes to loan,
the sums necessary for District No. 1 to meet its current Fiscal Year obligations for
capital facilities construction.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual consideration and benefits,
the parties hereto agree as follows-
Section o District No. 2 shall loan to District No. 1 the sum of Six Million
Three Hundred Thousand ($6,300,000.00) Dollars, which sum shall be transferred by
the Director of Finance to the credit of District No. 1 as a matter of record in the capital
facilities' accounts and funds of District No. 1.
Section : District No. 1 agrees to borrow from District No. 2 the sum of Six
Million Three Hundred Thousand ($6,300,000.00) Dollars, and by execution of this
Agreement, promises and agrees to pay to District No. 2 said sum, together with
interest, calculated on a daily basis at a rate equal to the average rate per annum
earned by District No. 2 in its long-term investment portfolios. Said principal and
interest shall be paid from the proceeds received by District No. 1 from its issuance of
any public debt or similar borrowing-type instrument, including Certificates of
Participation, but in no event five (5) years later than the date of execution of this
Agreement.
Sect o 3: The funds borrowed by District No. 1 shall be used solely for
purposes related to its Capital Facilities Funds' obligations.
Section 4: This Agreement shall be effective upon approval of the Board of
Directors of District No. 1 and the Board of Directors of District No. 2.
RW:pj Dr No.2M1 7
N..51 2
y
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed in the name of
each District, by its authorized officers, on the day and year first above written.
"DISTRICT NO. 1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
"DISTRICT NO. 2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF
DISTRICT COUNSEL
By
TLW:pjD W.1VIMM7
w.5m 3
J
AGREEMENT PROVIDING FOR INTER-DISTRICT
LOANS FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES BETWEEN
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11
OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into, to be effective this_day of
1998, by and between:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "District
No. 3",
AND
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as "District
No. 11".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, District No. 3 and District No. 11 are each independent government
agencies and parties to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement,
effective July 1, 1985, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of said Joint Agreement, District No. 3 and
District No. 11 are each obligated to pay their respective proportionate share of all
operation and maintenance expenses incurred for the treatment and disposal of
wastewater, together with the capital cost of construction of facilities; and
WHEREAS, District No. 11 needs to borrow funds to pay its 1997-98 Fiscal Year
obligation to the Joint Funds; and
nw:vl:o.rtW 1.01n1 sa
N.,577N 1
G
WHEREAS, District No. 3 has funds which are presently not necessary for
meeting its financial obligations to the Joint Funds for Fiscal Year 1997-98, and
WHEREAS, District No. 11 wishes to borrow, and District No. 3 wishes to loan,
the sums necessary for District No. 11 to meet its current Fiscal Year obligations for
capital facilities construction.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual consideration and benefits,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1: District No. 3 shall loan to District No. 11 the sum of Four Million
($4,000,000.00) Dollars, which sum shall be transferred by the Director of Finance to
the credit of District No. 11 as a matter of record in the capital facilities' accounts and
funds of District No. 11.
Section . District No. 11 agrees to borrow from District No. 3 the sum of Four
Million ($4,000,000.00) Dollars, and by execution of this Agreement, promises and
agrees to pay to District No. 3 said sum, together with interest, calculated on a daily
basis at a rate equal to the average rate per annum earned by District No. 3 in its long-
term investment portfolios. Said principal and interest shall be paid from the proceeds
received by District No. 11 from its issuance of any public debt or similar borrowing-
type instrument, including Certificates of Participation, but in no event five (5) years
later than the date of execution of this Agreement.
Section The funds borrowed by District No. 11 shall be used solely for
purposes related to its Capital Facilities Funds obligations.
nw:pl:oren No.191al=
No.57798 2
Section 4 This Agreement shall be effective upon approval of the Board of
Directors of District No. 3 and the Board of Directors of District No. 11.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed in the name of
each District, by its authorized officers, on the day and year first above written.
"DISTRICT NO. 3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
"DISTRICT NO. 11"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
Secretary, Board of Directors
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF
DISTRICT COUNSEL
By
RW:pj:�ft No.1IMIM
No.5"N 3
-a
,y County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P. O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
Wednesday, December 17, 1997 at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, December 17, 1997, at the Districts'
Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
OTHERS PRESENT:
PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel
John J.Collins,Joint Chair Ryal Wheeler
Peer A. Swan,Vice Joint Chair
George Brown,Chair, FAHR STAFF PRESENT:
Pat McGuigan,Chair,OMITS Donald F.McIntyre,General Manager
Bill Steiner, Director/Supervisor Blake P.Anderson,Assistant General Manager
Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary
Nancy Wheatley,Director of Technical Services
ABSENT:
Burnie Dunlap, Chair,PDC
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
MOTION: Receive, file and approve draft minutes of the November 22, 1997 Steering Committee
meeting. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 2 Y
December 17, 1997
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager received a copy of a letter to LAFCO from IRWD requesting that the hearing on
consolidation of the Districts be delayed 60 days so that they have additional time to consider impacts
on existing agreements after consolidation. Discussions are continuing between IRWD and the
Districts, and a meeting has been scheduled for January 5, 1998 to review IRWD's concerns. It
appears that a written understanding should be able to be resolved without holding up the LAFCO
process.
At the Board meeting, a report will be presented on the impacts of the December 6 storm. Blake
Anderson described some of the activities and findings that will be discussed.
Nancy Wheatley reported that the draft NPDES permit has finally been received. The changes
were briefly discussed. They will be discussed in detail at the December 18 Strategic Plan Ad
Hoc Committee. Public workshops are scheduled for January 22 and 23. The hearing is
scheduled for Friday, March 6. The permit will be effective 33 days after that date and will be in
force for five years.
Linda Eisman, Training Manager, has resigned to take a position in Savannah, Georgia. The
position will be filled from within the organization.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel requested that an item be added to the closed session on two matters of litigation.
The Committee agreed to the addition.
DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-5)
1. Renaming the Consolidated Districts. Michelle Tuchman reported that there were 38
suggestions received and the list was narrowed to seven. General Counsel indicated that the
name of the Districts can be changed at any time during the consolidation process. The
consensus of the Steering Committee was to change the name to "Orange County Sanitation
District."
Action Item: Prepare an Agenda Report for the January Board agenda recommending
changing the name of the agency to"Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)."
2. Nancy Wheatley's WEF Trip to Singapore, March 1998. It was moved, seconded and passed
to recommend that the Joint Boards approve out-of-country travel by Nancy J. Wheatley; and
approve payment of registration fee in the amount of$575 for Nancy J. Wheatley to attend
the Water Environment Federation's Technical Conference in Singapore, Asia.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
December 17, 1997
3. Consider recommending the appointment of the General Manager to serve as an alternate
director on the Joint CSDOC/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater
Replenishment System (GRS), formerly the OCR Project, for purposes of having quorums at
meetings. The motion was moved, seconded and unanimously approved.
4. Labor/Management Committee Meeting—Report of Meeting held on December 15, 1997.
The General Manager explained the background leading up to the formation of this
Committee. The intent is to have an ongoing relationship with the union representatives to
try to avoid confrontations. The unions have expressed concern about DART dealing with
meet and confer issues. Joint Chair Collins reported that the meeting was "open"and worth
the effort. Basic philosophies and the structure of the committee were discussed.
5. The routine action of reviewing next month's Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to
Committees was not held because the Committees are not meeting in January.
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
Blake Anderson reported on recent activities regarding the bankruptcy. Director Steiner provided
insight on behalf of the Board of Supervisors.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for January 28, 1998 at 5:30 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION
The General Manager reported to the Directors the need for a closed session, as authorized by
Government Code Section 45956.9, to discuss personnel issues. He reported that the item
could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the
Committee. No other item would be discussed or acted upon.
The Committee convened in closed session at 6:50 p.m.
Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in
accordance with California Government Code Section 45957.2 and are maintained by the Board
Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
A report of the action taken will be publicly reported at the time that the approved action becomes
final.
At 7:05 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
6
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 4 N
December 17, 1997
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m.
Submitted by:
�Tappan, Stee o g Committee Secretary
/c 17. .Mc
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 1/28/98
I
AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitatlon Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Prepared by: Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
SUBJECT: Districts' Name Change
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Approve name change from the "County Sanitation Districts of Orange County" to the
"Orange County Sanitation District"to coincide with the July 1, 1998 consolidation date.
SUMMARY
Consolidation of the Districts affords an opportunity to change our name, should the
Joint Boards of Directors so choose. To provide the Board with a list of possible names
and to engage the participation of employees, staff was encouraged to submit
recommendations. Thirty-eight were received with seven presented to the Steering
Committee for consideration during their December 1997 meeting. The Committee
recommends for approval the"Orange County Sanitation District."
DISCUSSION
We have the ability to change our name at any time during the consolidation process,
according to legal counsel.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
BUDGETIMPACT
The cost of a name change has been factored into the cost of reordering many of our
current items. For example, the FY98 budget includes the usual reprinting of some
stationery items, including letterhead, envelopes, business forms, business cards,
brochures, pamphlets and other materials imprinted with our name. The cost for these
items is approximately $25,000. (We have a temporary "hold" on reordering these items
pending a name change.) The possibility does exist that we will have to reorder critical
items before we have used the stock on hand to meet our July 1 consolidation deadline.
Otherwise, the cost of reprinting will be divided between the FY98 and FY99 budgets.
mmmmmronmw.�nimz,eww.n.,n,se,".nm.a..aa
Page 1
Other items that will eventually need updating include patches on work shirts and
jackets. And, while many of the signs located throughout the plants are produced in-
house, the larger signs will need to be replaced. A cost has not been determined for
signage replacement.
CEQA FINDINGS
None
ALTERNATIVES
None
ATTACHMENTS
None
\Ya0},Va181 W p Ole W nn1218N W nIMb1%IutlBoa6i Os
q,,,,, �7 Page 2
yi County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County,California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenu
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
RE STRATEGIC PLAN
Thursday, December 18, 1997 at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on December 18, 1997, at 5:30 p.m., at the
Districts'Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
OTHERS PRESENT:
PRESENT: Kellene Bum-Lucht,CDM
George Brown,Comm. Chair and Chair, Thomas M. Dawes, Consultant
FAHR Director Mark Schwing
John Collins,Joint Chair
Peer A.Swan,Vice Joint Chair STAFF PRESENT:
Jan Debay,Chair, District 5 Don McIntyre, General Manager
Burnie Dunlap,Chair, PDC Blake Anderson,Assistant General Manager
Shirley Dettloff, Chair pro tem, Dist. 11 David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Bill Steiner, Supervisor/Director Michelle Tuchman,Director of
Communications
Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer
ABSENT: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Pat McGuigan,Chair,OMTS Nancy Wheatley,Director of Technical
Services
Angie Anderson, Principal Engineering
Associate
Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re r
the Strategic Plan jj
Page 2
December 18, 1997 t
RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the October 23, 1997 Strategic Plan Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as
drafted.
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager reported that the new ocean ouffall permit has been received. Because of
some of the requirements contained within the draft permit, the assumptions used by our
planning staff and our consultant, CDM, will have to be altered. Staff and CDM will use this
juncture to reexamine all of the assumptions they have been using for developing the Strategic
Plan, and this will change some of the facilities projects contained within the Plan.
The General Manager also reported that the original approach to our Strategic Plan efforts has
been to project flows and operating conditions to the year 2020. While this is useful for long tern
financial and facilities planning purposes, it may cause us to overlook shorter-term opportunities
that can allow us to forego up-front funding of certain facilities (and, incidentally, the operating
and maintenance costs that are implied by the start up of the facilities).
The General Manager reported that staff, in its effort to assemble the Strategic Plan, now sees
that the time to adequately review the technical information provided by our consultants, digest it,
and convey responses and suggested changes back to them is a larger effort than they had
originally assumed. We want to "get it right." That is, with a twenty-year, one billion dollar
program ahead of us, it is important that we thoroughly test and evaluate all of the critical
underlying assumptions and calculations that will be the underpinnings of our future efforts. In
addition, staff is forecasting the future regulatory landscape in light of our draft ocean discharge
permit. That information will be conveyed to CDM in January so that its planning assumptions
can be adjusted accordingly.
For all of the reason cited, the General Manager reported that the schedule, scope, and budget
of the Strategic Plan must be amended. Staff estimates that an additional 10- 15% increase in
our consultants time will be required. Therefore, staff, in the very near future, will seek
authorization for additional funding from the Directors.
Nancy Wheatley reported on the changes in the new NPDES permit. The anticipated treatment
requirements and costs for the new permit limitations will determine policy. The existing policy
requires 50:50 secondary effluent. Any change in this ratio should be done after the EIR process
is complete. Reducing the amount of secondary from 50%to the permit limits could save $2.5
million per year in operating costs. The EIR for the Strategic Plan needs to address the mass
emissions levels of 20,000 metric tons and/or 25,000 metric tons per year. Additional analyses
would be required to reopen the permit to increase to the 25,000 metric ton limit. A focused EIR
would have to be prepared. Once water reclamation is on line and more secondary is going to
the Water District, the driving factor becomes the concentration of the effluent. The next permit
application will have to focus on that issue.
A discussion followed on the pros and cons of levels of secondary treatment. Staff will revise the
charts before distributing them.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page 3
December 18, 1997
DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-2)
1. Status of the Strategic Plan
Gary Streed reported that the FAHR Committee received the RAC report and
recommendations.
Jim Herberg reported that over 400 EIR Notices of Preparation were mailed. The comment
period closed December 4. Jim reviewed some of the comments that were received.
Tom Dawes updated the Committee members on the Groundwater Replenishment System
(GRS), formerly known as the Orange County Water Reclamation Project (OCR). The
Notice of Preparation for the EIR/EIS has been mailed. A project press briefing has been
held. The name of the project was changed based on feedback from the focus groups.
The next task is to secure grant money, complete the engineering studies and the EIR,
Blake Anderson discussed the revised schedule of events. This was changed to give staff
time to evaluate all of the technical aspects of the project. The impacts of the six-month
delay were discussed. The PAC/RAC members will be notified of the current status and
monthly updates will be provided thereafter.
The dates for the Board workshops were discussed and scheduled as follows:
January 31 New Directors Workshop
February 28 Level of Treatment
March 14 Energy Management and Strategic Planning Issues
2. Peak Flow Management
Blake Anderson discussed some of the issues staff is dealing with at this time, including
flow projections and projected average dry weather flows. Decisions need to be made on
GRS and meeting the annual mass emission limitation of 20,000 metric tons. Staff is still
working on developing average consumption numbers, which will drive a lot of future
activities. Staff is actively working with the cities to understand where infiltration occurs.
Director Swan suggested a trial study program to install stoppers in manholes above where
the meters are installed.
The impacts of the GRS project on the level of secondary treatment was discussed.
Between the years 2003 and 2020, concentration criteria will drive the amount of
secondary.
Director Swan discussed the water conservation incentive rate structure implemented by
IRWD.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
I �
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page 4
December 18, 1997
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting will be at the call of the Chair.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 7:10 p.m.
Submitted by:
e Tappan, Ad Hdb C m�mittee Secretary
CenNatllMy GM1W min`G MNONCLBIISIRAiVLMDEC1121B0]mi.�Nn Gx
y Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 3
January 21, 1998
In response to Chair Brown's inquiry, Director John Collins (JC) advised that the Steering
Committee will meet as regularly scheduled, since most of the Steering Committee members are
familiar with the information that will be discussed at the Strategic Plan Review meeting.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel Tom Woodruff advised that Monday was the last date any of the employees
involved in the drug investigation could file a lawsuit against the Districts, due to the statue of
limitations in this matter. No additional suits have been filed, and there is only one rase still
pending.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS N -21
1. FAHR98-01: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
DECEMBER 1998, AND FORWARD TO THE JOINT BOARDS
2. FAHR98-02: Receive and file Certificates Of Participation (COP) Report
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended
actions for items specified as 1 through 2 under"Consent Calendar."
ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 3 -7)
3. FAHR98-03: Approve Resolution No. XX, Approving Revisions to the Deferred
Compensation Program for the Executive Management Group Employees (General Manager,
Assistant General Managers and Department Heads) and Management, Professional and
Supervisory Employees of the Districts, and Repealing Resolution No. 95-81
Director John Collins (JC) requested that his abstention from discussion and voting on this
matter be made a matter of record, as well as his absence from the conference room during
the Committee's consideration of this item.
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, reviewed the proposed two
revisions to the Districts' existing Deferred Compensation Program, which are to 1) remove
the 3-year vesting period which he has determined to be in conflict with the California
Supreme Court decision in Ventura; and 2) a non-substantive language change which
redefines employer"contributions"to"supplementary salary"in order to satisfy the
requirements of law as set forth by the Supreme Court. This will allow employer contributions
to continue to be counted towards "final compensation"for Districts'employees in the Orange
County Employees Retirement System.
Discussion took place regarding the pros and cons of the three options presented to the
Committee, the differences between 401K and 457 plans, the difference in the way the
private and public sectors allocate their matching benefit portions of these plans to retirement
funds, and the legality of making the recommended changes.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve Option No. 1, to do nothing,
with the stipulation that we do not include the employer matching funds benefit in employee
salary calculations to OCERS for final compensation purposes.
W
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 4
January 21, 1998 V
Director Swan requested that staff solicit a third opinion on the Plan and vesting requirements.
4. FAHR98-04: Approve Ordinance No. 135, Providing For an Early Retirement
Incentive Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as
Authorized by the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section
31641.04
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Human Resources Director Mike Peterman reported that the
proposed Ordinance would provide an early retirement incentive program to eligible Districts'
employees as authorized by the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, and
Government Code Section 31641.04.
The Districts' Five-Year Staffing Plan calls for the reduction of an additional 25 employees.
The Boards approved all Early Retirement Incentive Programs brought before them for each
of the last three fiscal years. During those three years, 26 employees have retired early with
only three positions refilled. The Districts' estimated savings are expected to be $4.4 million
through fiscal year 1999.
Discussion look place regarding early retirement incentives used in the private sector.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried, with one no vote, to recommend that
the Joint Boards approve Ordinance No. 135, Providing For an Early Retirement Incentive
Program by Granting Additional Service Credit to Eligible District Employees as Authorized by
the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04
5. FAHR98-05: Approve the assignment of the implementation portion of the
J. D. Edwards Financial Information System (FIS) Contract to Enterprise
Technologies
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Controller Mike White gave an overview of the Districts'
Financial Information System (FIS) implementation program and the costs previously
authorized by the Joint Boards for this project for hardware, software licenses, system
installation, training and data conversion
Since the Financial Information System agreement was entered into with J.D. Edwards in
October of 1996, various changes in the company's strategies has led to a decline in the
overall project management services provided to the Districts. J.D. Edwards has encouraged
us to replace them with one of their business partners. Therefore, the Finance Department
conducted interviews with three of J.D. Edwards' business partners. Of the three, Enterprise
Technologies was determined to be the best firm to complete the project.
During discussion, the Committee had numerous questions regarding the J.D. Edwards
contract, whether legal action should be taken against them, whether all or part of their
contract will be assigned. The Committee questioned the reasons for the change in the
project completion date, and the specifics of the original contract. The Committee was
interested in obtaining background information on Enterprise Technologies, how many people
will be working on the project, if it is assigned to them, the number of hours they plan to work
on the project and estimated costs.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried, with one no vole, to table this hem to
the February meeting.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 5
January 21, 1998
The Committee requested that staff provide them with an abstract of the contract, a cost
analysis of what has been spent, what has been obligated, how much is left. They requested
schedules showing how much of the work has been completed and a background report on
Enterprise Technologies. It was also requested that staff invite the owner of Enterprise
Technologies to attend the next meeting to answer questions of the Committee.
6. FAHR98-06: 1. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc., for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan
Treatment, Disposal and Reuse Plan, Job No. J-40-3, to provide additional planning and
design services in the amount of$397,239, for a total amount not to exceed $1,085,749; and
2. Extend the contract duration for an additional six months to April 1999.
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor, gave an overview of
the project and the additional work proposed in Addendum No. 2. He advised that the issues
have been discussed with the Ad Hoc Committee and they have concurred with staffs
analysis and proposed revisions to the project. Total additional fees for the work is $397,239,
approximately 15% of CDM's existing budget for Phases 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan.
Additional Work Items consist of Planning/Permit Assumptions $299,233; Additional Public
Participation (PAC 2) $46,969 and Rate Structure Issues$51,037.
Technical Services Director Nancy Wheatley advised that the EPA requirements regarding
the discharge requirements is a very important part of the change.
Staff clarified that the changes to the project concern Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Joint Boards
approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser&
McKee, Inc., for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan (Treatment, Disposal and
Reuse Plan), Job No. J-40-3, to provide additional planning and design services in the
amount of$397,239, for a total amount not to exceed $1,085,749; and 2. Extend the contract
duration for an additional six months to April 1999
7. FAHR98-07: Award contract for Job No. P2-70, Replacement of Construction
Management Trailers at Plant No. 2, to Space Leasing Company, Inc., in an amount not to
exceed $183,989
MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Joint Boards
award the contract for Job No. P2-70, Replacement of Construction Management Trailers at
Plant No. 2, to Space Leasing Company, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $183,989
INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
None.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no dosed session.
Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee
Page 6
January 21, 1998
v:
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
None.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
None.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
ACTION AND STAFF REPORT
None.
FUTURE MEETING DATES
The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for
Wednesday, March 11, 1998, at 5:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:58 p.m.
Submitted by.A. `` �/ M _' e
L9'�lQ.l l/lW�-/
Len ra Crane
Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee Secretary
\\RADOMDATAI\WR DTAIANVO CRANETAHRTAHR99UANA-99MIKDOC
FAHR COMMITTEE "ee112 g [e Tcx.ea:.
Ol/21/g8 01/29/ge
AGENDA REPORT ItemNumEer IemNumbe``
/• /.SIC J
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: Treasurers Report for the month of December 1997
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of December 1997.
SUMMARY
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), has served as the Districts'
professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust as the Districts' third-
party custodian, since September 1995.
The Districts' Investment Policy, adopted by the Joint Boards, includes reporting
requirements as listed down the leftmost column of the attached PIMCO Monthly
Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating
Monies." The Districts' external money manager is operating in compliance with
the requirements of the Districts' Investment Policy. The Districts' portfolio
contains no reverse repurchase agreements.
Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as
estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused
by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
None.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
1YMm1G•Y1Vj.ftft 1V .Wro HWWRBA4NFAHRB 1.
RM 1m7m Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-
term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted
investment portfolio transactions for the month of December 1997 is attached.
The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting
enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market
values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon
Trust, the Districts' custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions
that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected.
The Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted
Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient
funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure
requirements for the next six months.
During the month of December, the Districts received $17 million through the
Orange County Tax Collector's property tax allocation cycle. The funds were
deposited to the Districts' Long-Term portfolio for investment. The table below
details the book balances of the Districts' funds at month-end. A graphical
representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart.
Book Balances Estimated
Funds/Accounts December 31, 1997 Yield(%)
State of Calif. LAIF $16,367,571 5.7
Union Bank Checking Amount 390,120 4.9
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 198,000 5.1
Bank of America Checking Account 74,594 4.1
Bank of America Money Market Account 127,833 4.0
PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 17,386,022 5.5
PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 295,309,523 5.6
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 15.127 5.6
Debt service Reserves @ Trustees 33,082,055 6.2
Petty Cash 4,400 —
Defemed Compensation 11,446,289 (0.13)-M.06
TOTAL 37d 401.5
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEGA FINDINGS
None.
�weo,imutby man�IlvewlFuIMFUBmBwmFAMaB6of.ax
rmrW Page 2
9
ATTACHMENTS
1. Monthly Investment Reports
2. Monthly Transaction Reports
GGS:SKIc
IMlonldmlMRGMfin1'llOrnnelFMd1FR11P091VJ11FA11PBBG1.Eoc
n 1W7W Page
,.7:n
TT WNI �
\ iouuiri
\\\
. . %////. %////. %////. \\ Moo
..... ..... ..... !....
;.;.;.;.;
•O.•pp, •❖•••,•. ••.•••.•., ••••❖••, ;O.•00, ;••••••••,
'•'•'•'•'� '•'•'•'•'• !'•'•••'•' X!❖.-*o 'o❖.❖. �.❖.❖.
..... ..... ..... !.... !.... !......... ..... !.... ..... ..... .....
❖., .,.,.❖., ❖.•.�.•, ,❖.❖.� �••••❖.•., , N
.❖.•.�., .�.�.❖., ❖.❖, :❖.❖., ❖.�.�
XXXXN
❖. ❖.,.,.•. !.... ...., ..... .....
!•o.❖a :o•.❖a !.❖.•.o :❖.❖o o.❖.moo •.�.,.,.,.
a : . :
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 December 1997)
Liquid Operating Monies
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
p�MM $17387,076
Me11ConO $17:386,022
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $17,387,076
Mellon $17,389,997
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.07
Of Index: 0.20
15.13 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $12,327(0.07%)
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0"/0
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 100%
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0%
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return (%):
1 Month: 0.49
3 Months: 1.40
12 Months: 5.63
Year-to-Date: 5.63
Index Total Rate of Return (%):
1 Month: 0.43
A
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING &REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 December 1997)
Long Term Operating Monies
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current MarketValue Estimate: ggZZggS5 55 55gg
• Mellon0 $295;380;521
Historical Cost:
PIMCO $294,676,421
Mellon $294,710,368
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.19
Of Index: 2.30
15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $6,594,723
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule) 0%
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA"
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 00/0
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (%)
1 Month: 0.80
3 Months: 1.95
12 Months: 7.87
Year-to-Date: 7.87
Index Total Rate of Return: (%)
1 Month: 0.74
A
OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-DEC-1997 H81100
% OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ -------
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 0.70 0.70 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,361,079.10 2,361,079.10 13.41% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3,157,099.33 3,1S7 099.33 17.93% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 2,662,858.55 2,662:358.55 1S.13% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 2,371,818.00 2,371,818.00 13.47% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 3,243,357.92 3,243,357.92 18.42% 0.00 0.00 0.00
BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 190,962.00 190,862.00 1.08% 0.00 7,1S7.33 3.75
__________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______
TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 13,987,075.60 13,987,075.60 79.45% 0.00 7,1S7.33 O.OS
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,402,921.88 3,398,946.00 19.31% -3,975.88 191,250.00 5.63
__________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,402,921.88 3,398,946.00 19.31% -3,975.88 191,2SO.00 S.63
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 219,554.18 219,554.18 1.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00
__________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ -------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 219,554.18 219,554.18 1.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 17,609,551.66 17,605,575 78 100.00% -3,975.88 198,407.33 1.13
Page 1
OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD
31-DEC-1997 HB1100
% OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ -------
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 0.59 0.59 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00
PAYABLES -74 889,331.91 -74,889,331.91 -24.89% 0.00 0.00 0.00
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - DOME 13:494,275.00 13,503,687.53 4.49% 9,412.53 803,250.00 SAS
COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 9,895,299.50 9,895,299.50 3.29% 0.00 0.00 0.00
BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 432,707.00 432,707.00 0.14% 0.00 16,226.51 3.75
__________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______
TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS -51,067,049.82 -51,057,637.29 -16.97% 9,412.53 819,476.51 -1.61
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 170,967,630.62 171,628,357.66 57.03% 760,727.04 11,232,510.09 6.54
U.S. AGENCIES 112,095,609.13 112.370,814.00 37.34% 275,204.87 7,254,890.00 6.46
GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 10,526,781.46 10,585,730.78 3.52% 58,949.32 700,310.19 6.62
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGA 3,492,480.47 3,500,274.05 1.16% 7,793.58 216,650.00 6.19
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 568,097.74 568,799.92 0.19% 702.18 35,222.06 6.19
BANKING & FINANCE 37,291,179.40 37,202,174.05 12.36% -89 005.35 2,400,112.47 6.45
INDUSTRIAL 10,935,640.00 10,511,010.00 3.49% -424:630.00 909,400.00 8.65
__________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ -------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 345,777,418.82 346,367,160.46 115.10% 589,741.64 22,749,094.91 6.57
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 5,630,467.82 5,630,467.82 1.87% 0.00 0.00 0.00
__________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 5,630,467.82 5,630,467.82 1.87% 0.00 0.00 0.00
NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 300,340,836.82 300,939,990.99 100.00% 599,154.17 23,558,571.32 7.83
Page 1
YLDAMOL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE 1
OCSF07511102 1997/12/31 RUN DATE v 01/07/98
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME v 15.40.49
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
CASH R CASH EQUIVALENTS ,
190,862.00 BSOT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 190,862.00 1.36
999495906 PUBLIC II 190,862.00 1.10
3,000,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS SYS DISC 5.488 .000 P-1 98.218 2,946,549.17 21.06
313313SA7 01/20/1998 2,946,549.17 16.95
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 5.555 .000 P-1 98.826 2,371,818.00 16.95
313385SP2 MAT OVOV1998 2,371,618.00 IS."
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 5.605 .000 P-1 98.664 2,367,926.00 16.92
313397TM4 RAT OV20/1993 2,567,926.00 13.62
2,600,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC 5.605 .000 P-1 98.679 2,565,644.16 18.34
313589RV7 MAT 01/15/1998 2,565,644.16 14.76
300,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK DISC NTS 5.610 .000 P-1 98.936 296,808.75 2.12
313313RV2 01/15/1998 296,808.75 1.71
800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.625 .000 P-1 98.674 789,393.33 5.64
65743DA84 01/08/1998 789,393.33 4.54
B00,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.635 .000 97.961 783,685.33 5.60
36959JAU7 01/28/1998 763,685.33 4.51
100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HIS ASSN DISC 5.668 .00D P-1 97.214 97,214.39 .69
313589YG2 MAT 06/19/1998 97,214.39 .56
800,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN KID CORP DISC 5.677 .000 P-1 98.647 789,173.33 5."
31339M6 MAT 03/26/1996 789,175.33 4.54
800,000.00 FORD MR CR CO DISC 6.024 .000 MR 98.500 786,000.44 5.63
34539UAE2 01/14/1998 788,000.44 4.53
-------- ------- ----------------- ---------
TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.451 .078 13,987,074.90 100.00
13,987,074.90 80.46
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.314 5.627 AAA 99.969 3,402,921.88 100.00
912827J45 05.625X 01/31/1998 DO OU01/93 3,398,946.00 19.55
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE t 2
OCSF07511102 1997/12/31 RUN DATE : 02/07/96
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 15.40.49
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.324 5.627 3,402,921.86 100.00
3,396,946.00 19.55
TOTAL 5.446 .258 17,389,996.78 100.00
17,386,020.90 100.00
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
UCSF07522202 1997/12/31 RUN DATE 01/07/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME , 15.40.49
PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ Y. TYPE
SECURITY 1S SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE Y. TOTAL
----------------- ------------------- --------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ----------
CASH 1 CASH EQUIVALENTS
432,707.00 BSOT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 432,707.00 1.81
999495906 PUBLIC II 432,707.00 .12
900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.653 .000 P-1 98.714 808,421.50 3.72
63743BACS 01/12/1998 988,421.50 .24
3,300,000.OD GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.696 .000 P-1 98.843 3,261,809.84 13.68
36959JAPS 01/23/1996 3,261,809.84 .88
1,000,000.00 BELLSOUTN TELECOM DISC 5.762 .000 P-1 98.923 989,233.33 4.15
07815KB80 02/11/1998 989,233.33 .27
2,1DO,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.774 .000 P-1 98.890 2,076,604.17 8.71
36959JAM3 01/22/1998 2,076,684.17 .56
11500,000.00 IBM DISC 5.785 .000 P-1 99.045 1,455,675.00 6.23
44922BB64 02/06/1998 1,465,675.00 .40
60D,CDO.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DIX 5.828 .000 99.ml 596,043.50 2.50
36959JACY 01/12/1998 596,043.50 .16
500,000.00 DO PONT BE NEMOUR DISC 5.858 .000 P-1 99.514 497,570.83 2.08
26354BAU6 01/28/1998 497,570.85 .13
13,500,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/O 5.994 5.948 100.027 13,494,275.00 56.66
0663JOKU7 05.9502 06/19/1998 DO 06/19/97 13,503,687.53 3.65
100,000.00 IBM DISC 6.249 .000 P-1 99.861 99,861.55 .41
449220A81 01/00/1998 99,861.33 .03
-------- ------- ----------------- -_-------
TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.548 1.838 23,822,281.50 100.00
23,831,694.03 6.44
FINED INCOME SECURITIES
4,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN TRANCHE STR 96 .000 5.625 Al 100.453 3,970,480.00 1.16
M540MZI FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DD 11/08/93 4,018,120.00 1.09
7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN IN 0 00177 .000 5.517 Al 99.667 6,999,746.00 2.04
345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 7,077,777.00 1.91
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE e 4
OCSF07522202 1997/12/31 RUN DATE 1 01/07/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 13.40.49
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ----"-- --.......... ----------
7,062.580.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT 3.654 3.643 AAA 99.500 7,053,542.97 2.02
9128273U 3.6257. 07/15/2002 OD 07/14/97 7,027,267.10 1.90
5,099,750.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.717 3.466 AAA 97.375 4,966,678.40 1.43
912627M3 3.3757.. 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 4,965,881.56 1.34
15,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.562 5.865 AM 100.172 15,045,117.19 4.33
912827Z70 05.875X 10/31/1998 DO 10/31/96 15,625,800.00 4.06
52,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.771 6.748 AM 101.875 53,755,691.40 15.52
912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 53,790,000.00 14.53
3,500,000.O0 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.415 AAA 103.281 3,613,203.13 1.04
9328272SO 06.625Y. 04/30/2002 DD 04/50/97 3,614,835.00 .95
27,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.828 7.074 MA 106.016 29,002,130.55 8.38
912827OU 07.500% 11/15/2001 00 11/15/91 29,048,384.00 7.85
5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN MTN 5.871 5.870 MA 100.031 5,000,781.25 1.44
31364FFMS S.BSOX 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 5,001,550.00 1.35
4,421,524.98 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-D CL A 5.957 5.904 MA 99.939 4,412,371.05 1.27
161614AE2 5.9007. 11/15/2001 DO ll/1S/95 4,418,827.85 1.19
28,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.094 6.315 AAA 102.922 28,468,923.23 8.32
912827VI 06.500Y. 05/31/2002 OD 06/02/97 28,818,160.00 7.78
10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA 6.101 6.170 AAA 100.000 9,978,125.OD 2.88
999U6619 6.170Z 01/25/2028 10,000,000.00 2.70
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONGS 6.162 8.869 AAA 125.437 61233,593.75 1.81
922810DES 11.125% 08/15/2OD3 OD 07/05/83 61271,050.O0 1.69
568,097.75 FIF7M THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 6.200 6.192 AAA 100.124 568,097.74 .16
31677EAA4 6.2OOX 09/91/2001 DO 03/15/96 S6B,799.92 .15
3,500,000.00 CONTIHORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 6.213 6.190 AAA 100.008 3,492,480.47 1.01
2107SWMS 6.190% 10/15/2011 DD 11/23/96 3,500,274.05 .95
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.277 6.158 AAA 101.828 4,994,531.Z5 1.46
9128272LS 06.2507. OU28/2002 OD OV28/97 5,091,400.00 1.38
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL "TO ASSN MTN 6.291 6.147 AAA 101.344 4,486,705.00 1.31 -
31364CKV5 6.2307.. 03/01/2002 00 03/03/97 4,560,480.00 1.23
VLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5
OCSF07522202 1997/12/31 RUN DATE , 01/07/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME , 15.40.49
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOWL YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __-_______
39,60D,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BOB 6.305 6.492 AAA 99.969 39,890,500.00 11.42
313391586 6.4901 09/13/2000 DD 09/13/95 39,547,724.00 10.69
1,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN 0 TR 00491 6.305 7.672 A2 100.233 1.031,840.08 .28
812MXUJS 7.690% 02/27/1998 OD OV28/95 1.002,330.99 .27
4,500,000.00 CATERPILLAR FIML MTHS TR00389 6.322 5.789 A2 99.841 4,466,745.00 1.29
14912LSE2 8.780% 07/15/1998 GO 1VIS19S 4,492,045.08 1.21
5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLOGS MTN 000196 6.364 6.699 BAR1 208.625 5103914".00 1.45
52517PJ04 6.6502 11/08/2000 DO II/98/96 5,951.259.08 1.36
4,484,481.95 GNM1 II POOL 20060023 6.375 6.334 AAA 242.625 4.555,756.19 1.32
36225CAZ9 6.SOOY. 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 4.6021199.60 1.24
1,305,000.00 BEAR STEAM COS INC SR HTS 6.425 6.664 A2 101.204 1,317,619.35 .38
0739OZAWS 6.7502 05/01/2001 DD 04/26/96 1.321.756.29 .36
17,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.449 7.330 AAA 105.734 17,734,215.75 5.18
912827IK3 07.760% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 17,974.780.60 4.86
1,000,000.00 CNRYSLER FIML MTM TR 0 00355 6.514 6.249 A3 240.172 993.160.00 .28
171200PYI 6.260% 07/20/1998 DO 07/18/95 1,002,720.00 .27
10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 6.528 6.939 AM 100.875 9,998,SS9.38 2.91
999ABT4 7.000% 01/15/2026 10,087,500.00 2.72
3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP KTN TROD324 6.532 8.174 A3 102.460 3,921,640.00 1.09
37042RPM8 6.375Y. 02/03/1999 DO 0/05/95 3,791,020.00 1.02
8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN MTN 6.577 6.483 AAA 102.187 8,012,576.00 2.36
31364CBD9 6.6257. 04/18/2001 OD 04/18/96 8,174,960.00 2.21
2,900,000.00 CNRYSLER FINL MTN TR 9 00306 6.591 7.244 A3 100.362 2,952,696.00 .84
171200NT4 7.270% 04/13/1998 DO 04/15/95 2,910.498.00 .79
9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS HT 6.593 8.755 A2 105.652 9,9D3,760.00 2.74
71aI54OB2 9.2507. 02/15/2000 9,506,680.00 2.57
10,000,000.00 FEDERAL HATL MTB ASSN MTN 6.636 5.726 AM 98.500 9,593,750.00 2.84
31364BVF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DD OU20/96 9,850,000.OD 2.66
3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 6.660 8.245 A3 104.612 3,227,070.00 .90
37042RK04 8.6251 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95 3,138,360.00 .85
YLOAKAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 6
0CSF07522202 1997/12/31 RUN DATE : 01/07/98
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 15.48.49
PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE
SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL
_________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________
5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MTG CORP BEGS 6.713 6.071 AAA :98.672 4:851.562.50 2.42
31S4AGWO 5.990X OV06/2001 DD 03/06/% 4,933,600.00 1.33
20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FMLMC GOLD 6.745 6.939 AAA 100.875 20:261,250.00 5.82
999MV993 7.000% 01/15/2027 20,175:000.00 3.45
5,840,269.37 CNMA I1 POOL 8080048K 6.826 6.832 AAA 102.453 5,968,025.27 1.72
36225CC20 7.0002 06/20/2027 OD 06/01/97 5,983,531.18 1.62
________ _______ ----------------- ---------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.554 6.403 345,777,418.02 100.00
346,367,160.46 93.66
_____ ______________ ______-__
TOTAL 5.554 6.343 369,599,700.32 200.00
370,198,854.49 200.00
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
02-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
U.S. DOLLAR CASH/SECURITIES RECEIVED FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 RECD FROM PLAN ADMINISTRATOR 18-DEC-1997 17,000,000.00 17,000,000.00 0.000000
NA9123459 ----------- 17,000.000.00 0.00 0.000000
CD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FRN97 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FRN97 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FRN97 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FRN97 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FSEE4 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2833 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
cw 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FSEE4 FHLMC GROUP #DB-2833 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
cw 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FSN61 FHLMC GROUP #D8-3113 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 1
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FTLO6 FHLMC GROUP #DB-3924 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
cw 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FTPY6 FHLMC GROUP #D8-4039 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FTQRO FHLMC GROUP #D8-4064 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
cw 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FTORO FHLMC GROUP #D8-4064 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
3128FTQRO FHLMC GROUP #DS-4064 ----------- -3.00 0.D0 0.000000
cw 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 09-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
912827D25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
cw 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
9128272WI U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
cw 064S00% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 02-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
9128273D2 U 5 TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
cw 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/1S/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 19-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
99345GS30 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
Page 2
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
____ ___________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ __________________
CW 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 23-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
9934SH082 WIRE FEES FROM 12-22 ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
OS.S60% 12/22/1997 DD 12/19/97 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 23-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
99345H9S9 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
CW 05.610% 12/23/1997 DO 12/22/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEES 26-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
9934SK044 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
cw OS.550% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 29-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000
9934SL604 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000
Cw 05.460% 12/29/1997 DD 12/26/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 TO REVERSE 18-NOV-1997 36.00 36.00 0.000000
999ABK443 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 36.00 0.00 0.000000
CWC 7.000% 11/15/2027 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PURCHASES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 ABBOTT LABS DISC 03-DEC-1997 -598,061.00 -598,061.00 99.676833
00282AZQ2 12/24/1997 03-DEC-1997 598,061.00 598,061.00 99.676833
B BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA, SAN F ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 ABBOTT LABS DISC 03-DEC-1997 -598,061.00 -598,061.00 99.676833
00282AZQ2 12/24/1997 03-DEC-1997 -598,061.00 0.00 99.676833
FC BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA, SAN F 03-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,S00,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 16-DEC-1997 -3,499,055.00 -3,499,05S.00 99.973000
066330KU7 05.950% 06/19/1998 DO 06/19/97 17-DEC-1997 3,499,055.00 3,499,055.00 99.973000
B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NV 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 3
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USE,
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 16-DEC-1997 -104,703.47 -104,703.47 99.973000
066310KU7 05.950% 06/19/1998 DO 06/19/97 17-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 99.973000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 16-DEC-1997 -3,603,7SB.47 -3,603,758.47 99.973000
06631OKU7 05.950% 06/19/1998 DO 06/19/97 17-DEC-1997 -3,603,758.47 0.00 99.973000
FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 17-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,000,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 05-DEC-1997 -989,233.33 -989,233.33 98.923333
07815KBBO 02/11/1998 05-DEC-1997 989,233.33 989,233.33 98.923333
B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1.000,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 05-DEC-1997 -989,233.33 -989.233.33 98.923333
07815KBBO 02/11/1998 05-DEC-1997 -989,233.33 0.00 98.923333
FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 05-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 29-DEC-1997 -497,570.83 -497,570.83 99.514166
26354BAU6 01/28/1998 29-DEC-1997 497,570.83 497,S70.83 99.514166
B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500 000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 29-DEC-1997 -497,570.83 -497,570.83 99.514166
26154BAU6 01/28/1998 29-DEC-1997 -497,570.83 0.00 99.514166
FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 29-DEC-1997 -789,173.33 -789,173.33 98.646666
313397UT6 MAT 03/26/1998 29-DEC-1997 789,173.33 789,173.33 98.646666
B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 29-DEC-1997 -789,173.33 -789,173.33 98.646666
313397UT6 MAT 03/26/1998 29-DEC-1997 -789,173.33 0.00 98.646666
FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
Page 4
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
100 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-DEC-1997 -97,214.39 -97,214.39 97.214388
33.H89YG2 MAT 06/19/1998 19-DEC-1997 97,214.39 97,214.39 97.214388
B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-DEC-1997 -97,214.39 -97,214.39 97.214388
313589YG2 MAT 06/19/1998 19-DEC-1997 -97,214.39 0.00 97.214388
FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-DEC-1997 -596,043.50 -596,043.50 99.340583
369597AC7 01/12/1998 02-DEC-1997 596,043.50 596,043.50 99.340583
B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 02-DEC-1997 -596,043.50 -596,043.50 99.340583
36959DAC7 01/12/1998 02-DEC-1997 -596,043.50 0.00 99.340583
FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 02-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 IBM DISC 31-DEC-1997 -99,861.33 -99,861.33 99.861333
44922BA81 01/08/1998 31-DEC-1997 99,861.33 99,861.33 99.861333
B MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 IBM DISC 31-DEC-1997 -99,861.33 -99,861.33 99.861333
44922BA81 01/08/1998 31-DEC-1997 -99,861.33 0.00 99.861333
FC MERRILL LYNCH GOUT SECS/MONEY 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 IBM DISC 08-DEC-1997 -1,485,675.00 -1,485,675.00 99.045000
449226064 02/06/1998 08-DEC-1997 1,485,675.00 1,485,675.00 99.045000
B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500 000.00 IBM DISC 08-DEC-1997 -1,485,675.00 -1,485,675.00 99.045000
44422BB64 02/06/1998 08-DEC-1997 -1,485,675.00 0.00 99.045000
FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 18-DEC-1997 -17,000,000.00 -17,000,000.00 100.000000
99345GS30 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 18-DEC-1997 17,000,000.00 17,000,000.00 100.000000
B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NV 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 5
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 18-DEC-1997 -17,000,000.00 -17,000,000.00 100.000000
99345G530 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 18-DEC-1997 -17,000,000.00 0.00 100.000000
FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 18-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 19-DEC-1997 -17,100,000.00 -17.100 000.00 100.000000
99345H082 OS.560% 12/22/1997 DO 12/19/97 19-DEC-1997 17,100,000.00 17,100:000.00 100.000000
B LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC. NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 19-DEC-1997 -27,100,000.00 -17,100,000.00 100.000000
99345H082 OS.S60% 12/22/1997 DO 12/19/97 19-DEC-1997 -17,100,000.00 0.00 100.000000
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,300 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-DEC-1997 -17 300,000.00 -17.300,000.00 100.000000
99�i45H959 05.610% 12/23/1997 DO 12/22/97 22-DEC-1997 17:300,000.00 17,300,000.00 100.000000
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17.300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-DEC-1997 -17,300,000.00 -17,300,000.00 100.000000
99345H959 05.610% 12/23/1997 OD 12/22/97 22-DEC-1997 -17,300.000.00 0.00 100.000000
FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC, NY 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
16,800,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 23-DEC-1997 -16,800.000.00 -16,800,000.00 100.000000
99345K044 OS.SSD% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 23-DEC-1997 16,800,000.00 16,800,000.00 100.000000
B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
16,800,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 23-DEC-1997 -16,800,000.00 -16,800,000.00 100.000000
9934SK044 05.550% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 23-DEC-1997 -16,800,000.00 0.00 100.000000
FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 23-DEC-2997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
9,100 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-DEC-1997 -9,100,000.00 -9.100,000.00 100.000000
99PSL604 05.460% 12/29/1997 DO 12/26/97 26-DEC-1997 9,100,000.00 9,100.000.00 100.000000
B LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
Page 6
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST ••
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/
______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________
9,100 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 26-DEC-1997 -9,100,000.00 -91100,000.00 100.000000
99145L604 05.460% 12/29/1997 DO 12/26/97 26-DEC-1997 -9,100,000.00 0.00 100.000000
PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
418.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-DEC-1997 -418.00 -418.00 1.000000
99949S906 PUBLIC ii 01-DEC-1997 418.00 418.00 1.000000
B 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
914,724.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-DEC-1997 -914,724.00 -914,724.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 01-DEC-1997 914,724.00 914,724.00 1.000000
B 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
86,887.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 08-DEC-1997 -86,887.00 -86,887.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC ii 08-DEC-1997 86,887.00 86,887.00 1.000000
B 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
5,277.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 11-DEC-1997 -5,277.00 -5,277.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 11-DEC-1997 5,277.00 5.277.00 1.000000
B 11-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
281,619.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 15-DEC-1997 -281 619.00 -281,619.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 15-DEC-1997 281:619.00 281,619.00 1.000000
e 15-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
107,295.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 17-DEC-1997 -107,29S.00 -107,29S.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC I1 17-DEC-1997 107,295.00 107,295.00 1.000000
B 17-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,786.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 19-DEC-1997 -2,786.00 -2,786.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC i1 19-DEC-1997 2,786.00 2,786.00 1.000000
B 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
S7,985.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 22-DEC-1997 -57,985.00 -S7,985.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 22-DEC-1997 57,985.00 57,985.00 1.000000
B 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 7
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
S06 302.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 26-DEC-1997 -506,302.00 -506,302.00 1.000000
994495906 PUBLIC ii 26-DEC-1997 S06,302.00 506,302.00 1.000000
B 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
10 826.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 29-DEC-1997 -10,826.00 -10,826.00 1.000000
994495906 PUBLIC II 29-DEC-1997 10,826.00 10,926.00 1.000000
B 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
100 189.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 30-DEC-1997 -100,18900 -100,189.00 1.000000
994495906 PUBLIC II 30-DEC-1997 100,189:00 100,189.00 1.000000
B 30-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 05-DEC-1997 -1,317,619.35 -1,317,619.35 100.967000
073902AW8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 10-DEC-1997 1,317,619.35 1,317,619.35 100.967000
B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 05-DEC-1997 -9,542.81 -9,542.81 100.967000
073902AW8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.967000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1.305,000.00 BEAR STEARNS COS INC SR NTS 05-DEC-1997 -1,327,162.16 -1,327,162.16 100.967000
073902AW8 6.750% 05/01/2001 DO 04/26/96 10-DEC-1997 -1,327,162.16 0.00 100.967000
FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 23-DEC-1997 -3 492 480.47 -3,492,480.47 99.78S1S6
21075WDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 29-DEC-1997 3:492:480.47 3,492,480.47 99.785156
B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
3,S00,000.00 CONTIMORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 23-DEC-1997 -16,8S0.56 -16,850.56 99.785156
21075WDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 Do 11/23/96 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 99.785156
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
__-- Page 8 « ..
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 THIN
BASE AMOUNT/
SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,500,000.00 CONTIRORTGAGE HOME EQ 96-4 A3 23-DEC-1997 -3,509,331.03 -3,509,331.03 99.785156
21075NDK8 6.190% 10/15/2011 DO 11/23/96 29-DEC-1997 -3,509,331.03 0.00 99.785156
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
568,097.75 FIFTH THIRD SK AUTO TR 96A CLA 18-DEC-1997 -568,097.74 -568,097.74 99.999998
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 23-DEC-1997 568,097.74 568,097.74 99.999998
B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
568,097.75 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 18-DEC-1997 -782.71 -782.71 99.999998
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DD 03/15/96 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 99.999998
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
568,097.75 FIFTH THIRD BK AUTO TR 96A CLA 18-DEC-1997 -568,880.45 -568,880.45 99.999998
31677EAA4 6.200% 09/01/2001 DO 03/15/96 23-DEC-1997 -568,880.45 0.00 99.999998
FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN #00196 23-DEC-1997 -5,039,450.00 -5.039,450.00 100.789000
52517PID4 6.650% 11/08/2000 DO 11/08/96 29-DEC-1997 5,039.450.00 5,039,450.00 100.789000
B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN #00196 23-DEC-1997 -123,763.89 -123,763.89 100.789000
52517PID4 6.650% 11/08/2000 DO 11/08/96 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.789000
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
5,000,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS MTN #00196 23-DEC-1997 -5,163,213.89 -5,163,213.89 100.7B9000
52517PID4 6.650% 11/08/2000 DD 11/08/96 29-DEC-1997 -5,163,213.89 0.00 100.789000
FC LEHMAN BROS INC 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -7.406,875.00 -7,406,875.00 105.812500
912827zx3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 7,406,875.00 7,406,875.00 105.812500
B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -193.118.21 -193,118.21 105.812500
912827zx3 07.7SO% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 105.812500
Page 9
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY
CODEID/
DESCRIPTION/BROKER
COMPLSETTLE
DATEDATE/
GAINCOST/
LOSS CORR GAIN GAIN
LOSS/
GAINLOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -7 599 993 21 -7,599,993.21 105.812500
912827ZX3 07.750% 02/15/2001 Do 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 -7:599:993:21 0.G0 105.812500
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 24-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 7,406,875.00 7,406,875.00 105.812500
912827ZX3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 -7,406,875.00 -7,406,875.00 105.812500
BC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 193,118.21 193,118.21 105.812500
9D827ZX3 07.750% 02/1S/2001 DO 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 105.812500
IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 7,599,993.21 7,S99,993.21 105.812500
911827ZX3 07.7SO% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 24-DEC-1997 7,599,993.21 0.00 IOS.812500
FCC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 24-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -7,406,875.00 -7,406,875.00 105.812500
912827ZX3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 26-DEC-1997 7,406,875.00 7,406.875.00 105.812500
B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,000 00000 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -196,066.58 -196,066.58 105.812500
93N27iO 07.7SO% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 105.812500
18 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7.000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 23-DEC-1997 -7,602,941.58 -7,602,941.58 105.812500
91H27ZX3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DD 02/15/91 26-DEC-1997 -7,602,941.58 0.00 105.812500
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-2997 -3,698,157.60 -3 698,157.60 102.726600
9128272WI 06.500% OS/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 23-IAN-1998 3,698,157.60 3:698,157.60 102.726600
e MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 10
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE' USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XKATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
3.600,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-1997 -34,714.29 -34,714.29 102.726600
9128272w1 06.500% OS/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 23-1AN-1998 0.00 0.00 102.726600
IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
35.000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-NOV-1997 -35,813,415.95 -35,813,415.95 100.563176
9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 01-DEC-1997 -35,813,415.95 0.00 100.563176
FC BANK OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20p000,OOO.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-NOV-1997 -20,250.000.00 -20 250 000.00 101.250000
999ABT030 7.000% 12/15/2027 22-DEC-1997 20,250.000.00 20:250:000.00 101.250000
B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-NOV-1997 -20p2SO,000.00 -20,250,000.00 101.250000
999ABT030 7.000% 12/15/2027 22-DEC-1997 -20,250,000.00 0.00 101.250000
FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 18-NOV-1997 -9,971,875.00 -9,971,875.00 99.718750
999AST113 6.080% 12/25/2027 23-DEC-1997 -9,971,875.00 0.00 99.718750
FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC. NY 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,750 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 -2,755,156.25 -2,755,156.25 100.187500
994ABT444 7.000% 01/15/2028 14-1AN-1998 2,755,156.25 2,755,156.25 100.187500
B GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-DEC-1997 -20.281,250.00 -20,281,250.00 101.406250
999ABV993 7.000% 01/15/2027 26-]AN-1998 20,281,250.00 20,281,250.00 101.406250
B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 05-NOV-1997 -2,753,437.50 -2,753,437.50 100.125000
999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 -2,753,437.50 0.00 100.125000
FC GREENWICH 11-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PAY UPS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 11
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS
RANSA TIONS- 31 DEC/997 TM100 USD
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
17 500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 1S-JUL-1997 -17,500.00 -17 500.00 100.000000
91f8273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-7UL-1997 17,500.00 17:500.00 100.000000
PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,S00.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT IS-JUL-1997 -17,50000 -17,500.00 100.000000
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-JUL-1997 -17,500:00 0.00 100.000000
FC 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
SALES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 ABBOTT LABS DISC 10-DEC-1997 598,061.00 598,061.00 99.676833
00282AZQ2 12/24/1997 10-DEC-1997 -598,062.00 -598,061.00 99.676833
S LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-600,000.00 ABBOTT LABS DISC 10-DEC-1997 644.00 644.00 99.676833
00282AZQ2 12/24/1997 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 99.676833
is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 ABBOTT LABS DISC 10-DEC-1997 S98,705.00 598,705.00 99.676833
00282AZQ2 12/24/1997 10-DEC-1997 598,705.00 0.00 99.676833
FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600 000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-DEC-1997 593,OS6.33 S93 056.33 98.842721
36659JAP8 01/23/1998 10-DEC-1997 -S93,OS6.33 -593:056.33 98.842721
S MORGAN J P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600 000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-DEC-1997 2,653.67 2,653.67 98.842721
364593APS 01/23/1998 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 98.842721
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-DEC-2997 S9S,710.00 595,710.00 98.842721
369S93AP8 01/23/1998 10-DEC-1997 S95,710.00 0.00 98.842721
FC MORGAN J P SECS - FIXED INCOME 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6.700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 -6,688,781.21 -6,688,781.21 99.83255S
Page 12 -_-
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
O1-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 6,688,781.22 6.688,781.22 99.832555
SC MORGAN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME ----------- 0.01 0.01 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6.700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 -5,942.54 -5,942.54 99.832555
93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 99.832555
ISC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 -6,694,723.75 -6,694,723.75 99.832555
93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 -6,694,723.75 0.00 99.832555
FCC MORGAN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 6,688.781.22 6,688,781.22 99.832555
93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 -6,688,781.22 -6,688,781.22 99.832555
S MORGAN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 5.942.53 5,942.53 99.832555
93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 99.832555
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6.700.000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-Nov-1997 6,694,723.75 6,694,723.75 99.832555
93114AZI6 12/01/1997 26-NOV-1997 6,694,723.75 0.00 99.832555
FC MORGAN 3 P SECS - FIXED INCOME 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 19-DEC-1997 17,000,000.00 17,000,000.00 100.000000
99345G530 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 19-DEC-1997 -17,000.000.00 -17,000,000.00 100.000000
S GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 19-DEC-1997 2,691.67 2,691.67 100.000000
9934SG530 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,000,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 19-DEC-1997 17,002,691.67 17,002,691.67 100.000000
99345GS30 05.700% 12/19/1997 DO 12/18/97 19-DEC-1997 17,002,691.67 0.00 100.000000
FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 13
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,100 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-DEC-1997 17,100,000.00 17 100,000.00 100.000000
99A45HO82 05.560% 12/22/1997 DO 12/19/97 22-DEC-1997 -17,100,000.00 -17:100,000.00 100.000000
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,100 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-DEC-1997 7,923.00 7,923.00 100.000000
9954SH082 05.560% 12/22/1997 DD 12/19/97 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,100 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 22-DEC-1997 17,107,923 00 17,107,923.00 100.000000
99145HO82 05.560% 12/22/1997 DO 12/19/97 22-DEC-1997 17,107,923:00 0.00 100.000000
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC. NY 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,300 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-DEC-1997 17,300,00000 17 300,000.00 100.000000
99145H959 05.610% 12/23/1997 DO 12/22/97 23-DEC-1997 -17,300,000:00 -17:300,000.00 100.000000
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,300,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-DEC-1997 2,695.92 2,695.92 100.000000
9934SH959 05.610% 12/23/1997 DO 12/22/97 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-17,300 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 23-DEC-1997 17,302,695.92 17,302,695.92 100.000000
9914SH959 05.610% 12/23/1997 DO 12/22/97 23-DEC-1997 17,302,695.92 0.00 100.000000
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NV 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-16,800 000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 26-DEC-1997 16,800,000 00 16,800,000.00 100.000000
9914SKO44 05.550% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 26-DEC-1997 -16,800,000:00 -16,800,000.00 100.000000
S GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NV ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-16,800 000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 26-DEC-1997 7,770.00 7,770.00 100,000000
99145KO44 05.550% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-16,800,000.00 GOLDMAN SACHS LP REPO 26-DEC-1997 16,807,770.00 16,807,770.00 100.000000
Page 14
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________
9934SK044 OS.SSO% 12/26/1997 DO 12/23/97 26-DEC-1997 16,807,770.00 0.00 100.000000
PC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 26-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-DEC-1997 91100,000.00 9,100,000.00 100.000000
99345L604 05.460% 12/29/1997 00 12/26/97 29-DEC-1997 -9,100,000.00 -9,100,000.00 100.000000
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-DEC-1997 4,140.50 4.140.50 100.000000
99345L604 05.460% 12/29/1997 DO 12/26/97 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000
Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,100,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 29-DEC-1997 9,104,140.50 9,104,140.50 100.000000
9934SL604 05.460% 12/29/1997 DO 12/26/97 29-DEC-1997 9,104,140.50 0.00 100.000000
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-596,047.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-DEC-1997 596,047.00 596,047.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 02-DEC-1997 -S96,047.00 -596,047.00 1.000000
s 02-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-598,061.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 03-DEC-1997 598,061.00 598,061.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC iI 03-DEC-1997 -598,061.00 -598,061.00 1.000000
S 03-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-289,233.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- OS-DEC-1997 289 23300 289,233.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II OS-DEC-1997 -289:233:00 -289,233.00 1.000000
S 05-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 09-DEC-1997 3.00 3.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 09-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000
S 09-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-132,747.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 10-DEC-1997 132,747.00 132 747.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 10-DEC-1997 -132,747:00 -132:747.00 1.000000
S 10-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 15
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
02-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 18-DEC-1997 3.00 3.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 18-DEC-1997 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000
S 18-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
-97 311.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 19-DEC-1997 97,311 00 97 311.00 1.000000
994495906 PUBLIC II 19-DEC-1997 -97,311:00 -97:311.00 1.000000
S 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-57 597.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 23-DEC-1997 57,597.00 57,597.00 1.000000
994495906 PUBLIC II 23-DEC-1997 -57,597.00 -57,597.00 1.000000
S 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-401,476.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 24-DEC-1997 401 476.00 401,476.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 24-DEC-1997 -401:476.00 -401,476.00 1.000000
S 24-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-65,978.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 29-DEC-1997 65,97800 65,979.00 1.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 29-DEC-1997 -65,978:00 -65,978.00 1.000000
S 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-107 806.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 31-DEC-1997 107,806.00 107,806.00 1.000000
994495906 PUBLIC II 31-DEC-1997 -107,806.00 -107,806.00 1.000000
S 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 05-DEC-1997 1,266 843 75 1,266,843.7S 105.570312
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 08-DEC-1997 -1,270:166:30 -1,270,166.30 105.570312
S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- -3,322.55 -3,322.SS 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES OS-DEC-1997 5,718.23 5,718.23 105.570312
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 10S.570312
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 16
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IMV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-1,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 05-DEC-1997 1 272 561.98 1,272,S61.98 105.S70312
912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 08-DEC-1997 1:272:561.98 0.00 205.570312
PC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-1997 3,700 125.00 3,700,125.00 102.781250
9128272w1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 17-DEC-1997 -3,654:703.12 -3,654,703.12 102.781250
S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NV ----------- 45,421.88 45,421.88 2.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-1997 10,928.S7 10,928.57 102.7812SO
9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 17-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 102.781250
IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-3,600 000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 17-DEC-1997 3,711 053.S7 3,711,053.57 102.7812SO
91f8272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 17-DEC-1997 3,711:053.57 0.00 102.781250
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 17-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-35,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 35,821,334.35 3S,821,334.35 100.585800
91f8273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/1S/97 01-DEC-1997 35,821,334.35 0.00 100.585800
PC HONG KONG & SHANGHAi BKG CORP. 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-DEC-1997 20 293,750.00 20,293,750.00 101.468750
999ABT030 7.000% 12/15/2027 22-DEC-1997 -20:250,000.00 -20,250,000.00 101.468750
S FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 43,750.00 43,750.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 17-DEC-1997 20,293,750.00 20,293,750.00 101.4687SO
999ABT030 7.000% 12/15/2027 22-DEC-1997 20,293,7SO.00 0.00 101.468750
PC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,000 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 20-NOV-1997 9,980,468.75 9,980,468.75 99.804688
994ABT113 6.080% 12/25/2027 23-DEC-1997 9,980,468.75 0.00 99.804688
FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 23-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 2,758 714.92 2,758,714.92 100.316906
999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 -2,753:437.50 -2,753 437.SO 100.316906
S GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 5,277.42 5:277.42 1.000000000
Page 11
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750 000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 2,7S8,714 92 2,7S8,714.92 100.316906
996434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 2,758,714:92 0.00 100.316906
FC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 11-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 -2,758 714.92 -2,758,714.92 100.316906
999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 2,753:437.50 2,753,437.SO 100.316906
SC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- -5,277.42 -S,277.42 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 -2,758,714.92 -2,758,714.92 100.316906
999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 -2,7S8,714.92 0.00 100.316906
FCC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 11-DEC-2997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750 000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 2,758,701.17 2,758,701.17 100.316406
994434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 -2,753,437.50 -2,753,437.50 100.316406
S GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 5,263.67 S,263.67 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 01-DEC-1997 2,758 701.17 2,7S8,701.17 100.316406
999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 2,758:701.17 0.00 100.316406
FC GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-258,608.11 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-DEC-1997 258,608.11 258,608.11 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1997 -258,072.71 -258,072.71 100.000000
PD ----------- 535.40 535.40 1.000000ODO
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-258,608.11 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-6 CL A 15-DEC-1997 2S8,608 11 258,608.11 100.000000
161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-DEC-1997 258,608:11 0.00 100.000000
FC IS-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-82,691.60 GNMA iI POOL #0080023 01-DEC-1997 82,691.60 82,691.60 100.000000
36225CAz9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-DEC-1997 -84,061.18 -84,061.18 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,369.58 -1,369.S8 1.000000000
0.00
Page 18
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-82,691.60 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-DEC-1997 82,69160 82,691.60 100.000000
36225CAz9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-DEC-1997 82,691:60 0.00 100.000000
FC 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-64 451.67 GNMA II POOL #080088M 01-DEC-1997 64,451.67 64,451.67 100.000000
36f25cc20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 01-DEC-1997 -65,861:55 -6S,861.S5 100.000000
PD ----------- -1,409.88 -1,409.88 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-64,451.67 GNMA II POOL #080088M 01-DEC-1997 64,451.67 64,451.67 100.000000
36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-DEC-1997 64,451.67 0.00 100.000000
FC 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
MATURITIES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-700 000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC OS-DEC-1997 697,746.00 697,746.00 100.000000
07iI53ZS0 12/05/1997 05-DEC-1997 -697,746.00 -697,746.00 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY OS-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800 000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NTS 29-DEC-1997 788,755.78 788,755.78 100.000000
M397RC7 MAT 12/29/1997 29-DEC-1997 -788,755.78 -788,755.78 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-100 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 19-DEC-1997 98,464.33 98,464.33 100.000000
3bS89QS5 MAT 12/19/1997 19-DEC-1997 -98,464.33 -98,464.33 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 PROCTER & GAMBLE DISC 08-DEC-1997 297,88400 297 884.00 100.000000
74271Rz83 12/08/1997 08-DEC-1997 -297,884:00 -297:884.00 100.000000
MT BOND MATURITY 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
INTEREST
U.S. DOLLAR
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
700 000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 05-DEC-1997 2,254.00 2,2S4.00 0.000000
07A157z50 12/05/1997 05-DEC-1997 2,254.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 05-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
Page 15
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
258,608.11 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-DEC-1997 23,010.65 23,030.6S 0.000000
161614AE2 S.900% 11/15/2001 DO ll/15/95 15-DEC-1997 23,010.65 0.00 0.000000
IT 25-DEC-2997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC NTS 29-DEC-1997 11,244.22 11,244.22 0.000000
313397RC7 MAT 12/29/1997 29-DEC-1997 11,244.22 0.00 0.000000
IT 29-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 19-DEC-1997 1,535.67 1,535.67 0.000000
313589QS5 MAT 12/19/1997 19-DEC-1997 1,535.67 0.00 0.000000
IT 19-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR 0 00177 30-DEC-1997 100,189.75 100,189.75 0.000000
345402H73 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 30-DEC-1997 100,189.75 0.00 0.000000
IT 30-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
82,691.60 GNMA II POOL #0080023 22-DEC-1997 24,738.86 24,738.86 0.000000
36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-DEC-1997 24,738.86 0.00 0.000000
IT 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
64 451.67 GNMA II POOL #080088M 22-DEC-1997 34,444.21 34,444.21 0.000000
W25CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-DEc-1997 34,444.21 0.00 0.000000
IT 22-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
300,ODO.00 PROCTER & GAMBLE DISC 08-DEC-1997 2,116.00 2,116.00 0.000000
74271RZ83 12/08/1997 08-DEC-1997 2,116.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 08-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
28,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 01-DEC-1997 900,054.62 900,054.62 0.000000
9128272W1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 30-NOV-1997 900,054.62 0.00 O.OG0000
IT 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
Page 20
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST -
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD
01-DEC-1997 - 31-DEC-1997 TM100
BASE AMOUNT/
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/
TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/
-------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------
-17,290.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-NOV-1997 -17,290.00 -17,290.00 0.000000
9128273AS 3.625% 07/IS/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-JUL-1997 -17,290.00 0.00 0.000000
ITC 28-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-NOV-1997 17,290.00 17,290.00 0.000000
9128273AS 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 28-NOV-1997 17,290.00 0.00 0.000000
CD RECEIVED INTEREST 28-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
NOVEMBER 1997 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
17,S00.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 31-DEC-1997 17,500.00 17,500.00 0.000000
9128273A8 3.625% 07/IS/2002 00 07/14/97 15-JUL-1997 17,S00.00 0.00 0.000000
IT 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 SHORT TERM FOS INT ADJ 31-DEC-1997 -7,944.91 -7,944.91 0.000000
99000OP34 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST 31-DEC-1997 -7,944.91 0.00 0.000000
CW AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES 31-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 01-DEC-1997 205.77 205.77 0.000000
996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 01-DEC-1997 205.77 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PINCO
0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-DEC-1997 417.50 417.50 0.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 01-DEC-1997 417.50 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PINCO
0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-DEC-1997 6,544.96 6,544.96 0.000000
999495906 PUBLIC II 01-DEC-1997 6,544.96 0.00 0.000000
IT 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
Page 21
Meetlng Date To JC 1%
FAHR COMMITTEE 1128198 �t 1rzt�syi�9sb�
i AGENDA REPORT 1twilumber /S ?A)r
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 'F
FROM: Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources
SUBJECT: EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Consideration of the following actions relative to the proposed adoption of Emergency
Ordinance No. 135, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 1 of Orange County, California, providing for an early retirement Incentive Program
by granting additional service credit to eligible Districts' employees as authorized by the
County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code Section 31641.04
(FAHR95-24):
a) Verbal report of General Counsel.
b) Consideration of roll call vote motion approving the program and authorizing
Districts to enact an Emergency Ordinance implementing the program.
c) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 135 by title only, and waive
reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors
present).
d) Consideration of motion to introduce Ordinance No. 135.
e) Consideration of motion to adopt Ordinance No. 135.
SUMMARY
The Boards have approved all Early Retirement Incentive Programs for each of the last
three fiscal years. During those three years, 26 employees have retired early. Three of
those positions were refilled. From the positions that were deleted the Districts saved or
will save $4.4 million through fiscal year 1999. Savings were projected through 1999
because it is the first year we realize the full savings of the 1997 early retirements. Staff
believes that it would again be prudent to offer this program because of the significant
savings and accelerated attrition that has been demonstrated.
Staff has inventoried the positions where the incumbent employee is eligible to
participate in this program. We have concluded that, due to changes of organization
and the method of providing services, no impairment to Districts' operations would result
from the approval and implementation of this program.
At least six employees have expressed strong interest in early retirement. If this
program is adopted, eligible employees with a minimum of ten years of service and 50
years of age would be granted two additional years of service credit for retirement
purposes, provided they retire from employment between February 1, 1998 and March
30, 1998.
WeeQb WfttgI MWWQ fl Rer 7AXRI aryRel.rem tl"O dM
Rmse IW1797 Page 1
Another reason for offering early retirement to employees at this time is a recent ruling
in the case of Ventura County Deputy Sheriff's Association vs. Board of Retirement of
the Ventura County Employees' Retirement Association. The attached memorandum
from Mike Peterman to all affected employees, and agenda item number three
regarding deferred compensation explains how employees can avoid a potential loss of
1 —6 percent in their retirement benefit if they retire prior to February 10, 1998.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
® Not applicable (information item)
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance 135
Spreadsheet"Early Retirement Analysis"
Early Retirement Memorandum
\WaWalelNl�Mpntla dBN R"pv15FANRFByR[uMMIf 93B Occ
Rpwp. w+ 9 Page 2
R
ORDINANCE NO. 135
PROVIDING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE
DISTRICT EMPLOYEES WHO RETIRE EARLY
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NO. 1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY
RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING
ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICT
EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937, GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 31641.04
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California have previously adopted Resolutions and
Ordinances approving early retirement incentive programs for all eligible District
employees as authorized by Government Code Section 31641.04; and
WHEREAS, previously adopted incentive programs were, as provided by law, for
a fixed period of time, each of which has now expired; and
WHEREAS, Districts' management has reported to the Boards the desirability of
implementing a further early retirement incentive program due to the implementation of
changes in the manner of performing Districts services and the savings of money and
other economic benefits that will flow to the Districts by the retirement of eligible
employees; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Ownership Operation and
Construction Agreement by and among County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,
209 4w
374241
13 and 14, District No. 1 is the appointed authorized agent to act for every other District;
and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as
agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 61 7, 11, 13 and 14 have determined that
changes in the manner of performing District services and the total cost savings of having
higher compensated employees retire early will exceed the total actuarial costs of the
additional service credit granted to those who retire under this program.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Government Code Section 31641.04 as a component provision of the
County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 is hereby adopted and deemed applicable to
all regular full time employees by the Board of Directors upon the adoption of this
Ordinance.
Section 2: All regular full time employees of the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, Califomia who are eligible to participate as members and retire under the
Orange County Employees Retirement System, shall be granted two (2) additional years
of service credit for retirement benefit purposes, provided they retire from regular
employment of the Districts during the period of February 1, 1998 through and including
March 30, 1998.
Section 3: The General Manager of the Districts, or his designee, is authorized
to execute any and all contracts or other documents and to transfer all required funds to
mv2.1 W
5]RS 1
the Orange County Employees Retirement System, in order to implement the authorized
actions provided for herein.
Section 4: The total cost savings resulting from the retirement of employees in
positions which are subsequently filled at a lower level or when the position is held vacant
for a period of time, shall exceed the total actuarial cost of the additional service credit
granted to those employees who retire together with the related paid leave payoff costs.
Section 5: Districts shall pay to the Orange County Employees Retirement
System the actuarially determined cost of this early retirement incentive program over a
period not to exceed five (5) years and on such other terms and conditions as shall be set
forth in a mutually agreed upon written contract between the Districts and the Board of
Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System.
Section 5: This Ordinance is enacted as an urgency measure to take effect
immediately in order to preserve and enhance the public welfare in that the Districts have
not fully recovered from all losses suffered in the bankruptcy of the County of Orange in
1995 and the savings of money through reduced employee compensation will partially
offset losses suffered and incurred directly by the Districts and whose full recovery is
otherwise unknown at this time.
Section 7: This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
Section g: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general
circulation as required by law.
202-SW
574241 -3-
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. ,
1 at a regular meeting held January 28, 1998.
Patricia McGuigan
Chair, Board of Directors, County
Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California
ATTEST:
Penny Kyle
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California
209bIN
574241 -4-
ATTACHMENT 'V
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP
General Manager
Assistant General Manager -Administration
Assistant General Manager - Operations
Department Heads:
A. Director of Communications
B. Director of Engineering
C. Director of Finance
D. Director of General Services Administration
E. Director of Human Resources
F. Director of Information Technology
G. Director of Operations and Maintenance
H. Director of Technical Services
MANAGEMENT
Financial Manager
Controller
Accounting Manager
Purchasing Manager
Engineering Manager
Construction Manager
Lab Manager
Source Control Manager
Chief Operator
Maintenance Manager
Human Resources Manager
Safety & Emer. Resp. Manager
Senior Regulatory Specialist
Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Manager
Training Manager
Operations Manager
Information Technology Manager
Plant Automation Manager
mn-em
57424 1
PROFESSIONAL
Senior Accountant
Accountant
Programmer Analyst
Programmer
Sr. Buyer
Buyer
Principal Administrative Assistant
Sr. Administrative Analyst
Engineer
Associate Engineer III
Associate Engineer II
Associate Engineer I
Principal Engineer Associate
Principal Env. Specialist
Project Specialist
Principal Lab & Res. Analyst
Scientist
Human Resources Analyst
Safety & Emer. Resp. Specialist
Regulatory Specialist
Contract Administrator
Safety Representative
Senior Financial Analyst
Financial Analyst
Senior Maintenance Planner
Planner
Computer Hardware Specialist
Telecommunications Specialist
SUPERVISORY
Principal Accountant
Technology Supervisor
Supervising Buyer
Warehouse Supervisor
Engineering Supervisor
Senior Engineer
Supv. Const. Inspector
2M-S o
574241
Compliance Supervisor
Lab Supervisor
Chief Scientist
Senior Scientist
Source Control Superv.
Supv. Source Ctrl. Insp.
Sr. Operations Supv.
Operations Supervisor
Maintenance Supervisor
Foreman
Environmental Management Supvr.
Principal Financial Analyst
CONFIDENTIAL
Human Resources Assistant
Executive Assistant I
Executive Assistant II
Secretary To The Board of Directors
2"2-8W
574241
1H5/98
Early Retirement Analysis
One time
Date Working Monthly Annual Position OCERS Net Annual Savings Total
Retired YM to 65 S8lary Salary Chanoes Expense 94-95 95-96 98-97 97-98 98-99 Savinos
Pamson,G Scientist 511/95 3 5,281 63,372 Deleted 13,872 10.562 49.500 63,372 63.372 63,372 250,178
Gutierrez,T Fee Mgr 3/31M 1 5,735 68,820 Deleted 51.402 17,205 17,418 68,820 68,820 68.820 241,083
Gutierrez.A Bulkler 6/30/95 2 3,400 40.800 Deleted 35.497 - 5,303 40.800 40.800 40.800 127,703
Marsella.D Mach Field Super 3/31/95 13 5,002 60.024 Deleted 31,227 15.006 28,797 60,024 60,024 60,024 223,875
McDaniel,B Foreman 3/31/95 7 4.132 49,584 Deleted 31,768 12,396 17,816 49,584 49,584 49,584 178,964
Taisne,J Mech Field Super 4/28/95 7 5,017 60,204 Deleted 41,030 10,034 19.174 60,204 60,204 60,204 209,820
Subtotal 94-95 Program 28,567 342,804 204,796 65,203 138,008 342,8D4 342,804 342,804 1.231,623
Shepherd,B Senior Stmaskeeper 3/28196 10 3,648 43,776 Refilled 22,656 -
Wynn.M HR Asst 328m6 7 3,697 44,364 Deleted 22,412 11,091 21,952 44,364 44,364 121,771
Randall,R Oper Super 1/isms 4 5,105 61,260 Deleted 45,807 28,078 15,453 61,260 61,260 166.051
Canavan,D Oper Super 1/15196 10 5,105 61,260 Deleted 38,787 28,078 22,473 61.260 61,260 173,071
Ramey,K Mice Mgr 3/28196 13 6132 73,584 Deleted 39,575 18,396 34,009 73,554 73,584 199,573
Subtotal 95-96 Program 23,687 284.244 169,237 85,642 93,887 240,468 240,468 660,465
Serraniino,S Sr.Constr Imp. 8/18/96 12 5.399 64,788 Deleted 37.685 56,690 64,798 64.788 186,266
Anderson,L Sr.Plant Operator 3127/97 6 4.231 50.777 Deleted 30,288 12.693 50,777 50,777 114,247
Marsalek,G Foreman 22J97 11 4.654 55,850 Refilled internally 33,314 23,270 55,850 55,850 134.970
MCRaney,C Sr.Constr Imp. 3131197 3 4,735 56,822 Deleted 33.894 14,205 56,822 68,822 127,849
Plechockl,H. Oper Super 22m7 6 5,337 64,047 Refilled internally 38.204 26,685 64,047 64,047 154,779
Pigmon,R. Maintenance Mgr 227/97 15 6,317 75,799 Deleted 45,214 25,268 75,799 75,799 176,866
Rood,T. Sr.Plant Operator 3/27197 6 4,489 53,865 Deleted 32,130 13.467 53,865 53.865 121,197
Rood,L. Sr.Mice Planner 3/27/97 5 5,550 66,595 Deleted 39.724 16,650 66,595 66.595 149.840
Starrett.B. Constr inspector 2097 @ 70 4,461 53,627 Deleted 31.929 13,383 53,527 53.527 120,437
Thomas,G. Lead Mechanic 1116197 2 4,108 49,297 Deleted 29,406 22.594 49.297 49,297 121,188
Thom[],W. Sr.Clerk 31311'97 Disability 2,788 33,453 Refilled 19.955 -
Yamsh,K Sr.Buyer 3/13197 9 4,154 49,853 Refilled 29.737
Dawes,T Engineering Mgr 3/28197 11 7,581 90,969 Refilled internally 54,263 22,743 90,969 90,969 204.681
Hamblin,W Sr.Mice Planner 3127/97 11 5.456 65,466 Deleted 39,050 16,368 65,466 65.466 147.300
Niemeyer,D. Insb Tech II 3/28197 10 4.252 51.018 Deleted 30,432 12,756 51,018 51,018 114,792
Subtotal 96.97 Program 66,263 795,146 473.342 263,389 745,293 745,293 1,753,975
Total 1,422,194 847,375 65.203 223,650 700,080 1,328.565 1.328.565 3,646,063
Salary Benefit Savings 16,953 58,149 140,016 265,713 265,713 746,544
Total Salary&Benefit Savings 82,156 281,799 840,096 1,594,278 1,594,278 4,392.607
EadyRoUrement98 9:51 AM
January 7, 1998
MEMORANDUM
TO: All Employees
FROM: Michael L. Peterman M1f
Director of Human Resources r
SUBJECT: EARLY RETIREMENT
We recently received a memorandum from OCERS stating that in the recent case of
Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs Association vs. Board of Retirement of the Ventura
County Employees' Retirement Association, the California Supreme Court ruled that
employer contributions to a deferred compensation plan are not included within the
definition of"compensable eaminps." Currently, the Districts treats employer
contributions as "compensable earnings."
What does that mean to you? It could mean plenty. If you are participating in matching
contributions to deferred compensation, the Districts' portion has been added to your
base salary to calculate your OCERS retirement benefit. With the new Ventura ruling,
your earnings that will be used to calculate your retirement benefit would be reduced 1
to 6 percent.
Because the ruling is controversial, the OCERS Board has decided to allow employer
contributions to continue as part of compensable earnings, but only up until February
10, 1998 when their Board meets, presumably to adopt this policy.
Since this could have a significant impact on employees that are preparing for
retirement, management plans to take the early retirement incentive to our Joint Boards
this month on January 28. That would give interested employees approximately a two
week window between January 28 and February 10 to take advantage of the higher
compensable earnings calculation by retiring from the Districts. If you are considering
retirement in the near future, please contact me at x7140 to determine how this affects
your retirement benefit. It may be to your benefit to take advantage of the early
retirement program.
If the Districts does not contribute to deferred compensation on your behalf, the Ventura
ruling regarding deferred compensation does not affect you. Pending the Boards
approval of the additional two years of service credit for early retirement, all eligible
employees with at least 50 years of age and 10 years of service, will be offered the
incentive.
H:\wp.dta\N\2520kpeteman\Benefim\EaflyRetirementdoc
FAHR COMMITTEE ".----TT9E.99.
1/2uT8 IM/99
+ REVISEDAGENDAREPORT
County sanitation DISCI 9 of orange County, California
FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: STRATEGIC PLAN TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND REUSE PLAN
(PHASE 2), JOB NO. JA0-3: ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER AND MCKEE, INC.
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp
Dresser & McKee, Inc. for preparation of Phase 2 of the Strategic Plan, Job No.
J-40-3 to provide additional planning and design services in the amount of$397,239
for a total amount not to exceed $1,085,749.
2. Extend the contract duration for an additional six months to April 1999.
SUMMARY
Recent developments, including revisions to the draft ocean discharge permit, have
required that the Districts reconsider many of the baseline assumptions of the Strategic
Plan. To date, 90 percent of the peak flow management and rate structure work (Phase
1), and about 50 percent of the treatment, disposal and reuse analysis (Phase 2) have
been completed. Using new baseline assumptions will require that some of the work
already completed by the Districts' Strategic Plan consultant, Camp Dresser & McKee
(CDM) be revised, and that the overall Strategic Plan schedule be extended by six
months. An addendum to the existing Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with
CDM will be required for this additional work.
In addition to revising work already completed, the proposed addendum also includes
(1) additional effort required to continue public participation beyond the Planning
Advisory Committee (PAC) and Rate Advisory Committee (RAC) processes which are
nearing completion, and (2) additional support in finalizing outstanding issues related to
rate structure changes planned for July 1, 1998.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The total additional fee proposed for this work is $397,239, approximately 15% of
CDM's existing budget for Phases 1 and 2 of the Strategic Plan. Staff believes that the
above changes to the Strategic Plan budget and schedule are necessary for the project
to move forward with baseline assumptions that reflect the best information available to
date.
Please refer to the attached Professional Services Agreement Status Report.
BUDGETIMPACT
❑ This item has been budgeted
® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. . (Line item: coRF Budget dem old)
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Please refer to the attached Budget Information Table.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The proposed Addendum No. 2 consists of additional work listed below. These issues
have been discussed with the Ad Hoc Committee, and they have concurred with staffs
analysis and the need to make the revisions to the work effort.
Planning horizon of 2010 versus 2020.
The original planning assumptions for treatment and disposal alternatives were to be
based upon projected conditions in 2020 with a detailed annual capital improvement
program through 2020. This approach has been revised to provide a detailed annual
capital improvement plan through 2010 with five year block increments of improvements
from 2010 through 2020. This change is being made because it will be difficult to make
detailed decisions based entirely on projections for 2020.
Effluent limitations, concentration and mass emission limits.
On December 17, 1997 the EPA and Regional Water Quality Control Board issued draft
discharge requirements for the Districts' ocean discharge permit. The draft permit was
anticipated much sooner, and as a result, work that has been done will need to be
revisited. The new draft permit contains several important revisions to the treatment
and discharge requirements under which the Districts currently operate. These include:
• Originally it was assumed that concentration limits would govern our operations in all
circumstances, allowing discharge emissions to rise with future flows, consequently
requiring additional secondary treatment. Under the draft permit conditions,
however, our operations will be governed by an annual mass emissions limit.
• The EPA is interested in promoting the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWR
System) and has written "reopener" provisions into the permit to consider revising
permit limits once the GWR System begins operation.
• The emergency discharge conditions have been revised, allowing the Districts more
flexibility.
The impact of these changes is that the Districts will have more flexibility in meeting
permit requirements. In order to consider this flexibility in making Strategic Plan
recommendations, CDM will need to revisit and revise the treatment scenario analyses,
cost estimates, disposal options, and biosolids management sections of the Strategic
Plan.
_ Continued Public Participation through completion of Strategic Plan beyond RAC and
to DrOcess.
A number of issues will require continued public involvement following the RAC and
PAC process, through completion of the Strategic Plan, including (1) the level of
treatment, (2) the program EIR, (3) the GWR System, and (4) the rate impacts from the
capital improvement plan. Staff recommends continuing the public participation process
during completion of the Strategic Plan through a scaled back version of the PAC and
RAC process. The newly formed public group would be referred to as PAC II, and
would consist of members from the RAC and PAC. Three additional public participation
workshops are proposed for PAC II.
Assistance in completing outstanding rate structure issues.
The recommendations of the RAC left a number of issues to be resolved prior to
implementation of a new rate structure. These issues include refining the commercial
categories, provision for annual payment of connection fees, criteria for applying wet
weather flow costs to various users, development of criteria for tiered residential
connection fees.
Additional Work Items, Addendum No. 2
Planning/Permit Assumptions $299,233
Additional Public Participation (PAC 2) $ 46,969
Rate Structure Issues 51.03
Total $397,239
ALTERNATIVES
None. If the additional work associated with revisiting the underlying assumptions as
described above is not performed, the Districts' strategic planning will not be optimized
because the underlying assumptions will not reflect actual conditions.
CEQA FINDINGS
The Strategic Plan includes a programmatic Environmental Impact Report which is
being prepared under a separate contract, J404.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Professional Services Agreement Status Report
2. Budget Information Table
3. Proposal letter from CDM dated January 20, 1998.
)dh
Professional Services Agreement Status Report
Job No. J40-3
Phase 1 Strategic Plan
Total Project Budget: $933.000
Consultant: Camp Dresser and McKee
Start Date of Project: January 22, 1997
Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated
Costs
1122/97 Original Phase 2 Strategic Plan —Treatment, Reuse and 673,461 673,461
PSA Disposal Plan
1/5198 1 Additional Energy Studies 15,049 688,510
Proposed 2 Revised Permit Conditions, Additional Public 397,239 1,085,749
Involvement, and Assistance with Outstanding
Rate Structure Issues
11AoVA1at nr72ftee1,erej40d arCDM.Yb1odon CmtM on OVIMS 5:44 PM
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
JOB NO. JAO-3 STRATEGIC PLAN: TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND REUSE
BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK (ADOPTED BY AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZED TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO
CORF) DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED FUNDS DATE DATE(%)
CONSULTANT $ 700.000.00 $ 686,510.00 $ 397.239.00 $ 1,083,749.00 $ 350,000.00 51%
STAFF $ 233.000,00 $ 136,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 261,000.00 $ 60,000.00 44%
TOTAL $ 933,000.00 $ 822,510.00 $ 522.239.00 $ 1,344,749.00 $ 410,000.00 50%
H.Awpola�ngbnftdm alrtable I-40 As
'. :AN.20.199B 3:20PM CML° DRESSER MC10=EE CARLSBAD NO.717 P.2/11
COMCamp Dresser&McKee I,,- . _ . . .
mxlha 1825 PW0rW06lewa%SUZ330
ceOdaQCaltminamas
mr�a+r Te1:7004313- 6 Fac76o48 7411
January 20,1998
Mr.David Ludwin
Director of&,gm ermg
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
108"Mbs Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92727-6127
�I Subject: Strategic Plan _ ..
II Addendum No,2 to ProjectJ40-3 -
Dear Mr.Ludwm:
We are in receipt of your letter dated January 8,1998 m which CSDOC responded to the
i� requests for clarification contained in our letter of December 1,1997 regarding Strategic
planning issues, We have developed an estimated budget and schedule to accommodate
revisions to the scope of work as a result of your responses. As requested,we have also
included budget and schedule estimates to provide additional services to cover other
project topics.
As we have discussed,the activities which are addressed under Addendum No,2 extend
over the entire strategic planning effort,not solely to the work under Project J110.3. The
activities addressed in this Addendum No.2 are summarized below:
r Revisions resulting from responses to the strategic planning issues raised in your
January 81 1998 letter;
li ■ Development of new technical memoranda requested in your January 8,1998 letter;
r Additional combined Planning Advisory Committee (PAC2)workshops;
■ Inclusion of collection system revisions raised in your December 17,1997 letter;and
■ Supplemental assistance to address issues regarding the finartdel rates and charges
work
In developing the scope revisions and associated budget and schedule impacts,we believe
we have accurately reflected your expectations regarding the additional work and the
1 required level of effort. We have summarized our understanding of CSDOC's objectives for
each task
I
' I
JON.20.1998 3:20PM COMP DRESSER MCJFE CARLSBAD NO.717 P.3/11
jGUM Gunp Diessa&McKee Ina
Mr.David Ludwin
January 20,1998
Page 2
Strategic Planning Issues
1. Planning harison of 2010 versos 2020.
The target planning year will remain 2020 and will be the basis for evaluating the initial
four optimized alternatives(full secondary treatment and treatment to meet ocean plan
criteria,with and without participation in the GWR System). When CSDOC selects the
final preferred alternative(based on effluent discharge standards and the participation
in the GWR System),a detailed yearly implementation plan for the first ben years andfor five-year increuhentsihereafter mitil 2020wtll be-p"aied.- —
An analysis of projected.outfall discharge frequences for 2010 flows will also be
i� performed to provide CSDOC with information on how overflow frequencies would be
II expected to change over time. However,cost estimates for ouW discharge options
j will be based of 2020 flows-
IIi The collection system will not be reevaluated for 2030 flows;the improvements to the
collection system,based on 2020 flows,will be used to develop staging of
b improvements needed in 2010.
Based on this understanding of the work,the following additional tasks have been
identified:
■ Analyze the STORM model using a 2010 base flow;
■ Calculate overflow frequencies for the disposal options in 2010;and
■ Revise the text for Volume 8,Collection System,to present and discuss this
information.
1 2. Fff vent limitations,concmtration and mass emission limits.
Ocean Plan discharge standards will be based on a total suspended solids(TSS)mass
emission rate which will be initially capped at 20,000 metric tons per year;concentration
will be allowed to"float". When the initial limit is reached,the annual M mass
emissions rate will be increased to 25,000 mt/yr. When GWR projectis online,the limit
wID return to 20,000 mt/yr and will be raised to 25,000 mt/yr when required. Analyses
will assume that no additional secondary treatment facilities will be constructed to
support delivery of suitable-quality water to the GWR System;consideration of
additional secondary facilities to maintain the capped TSS mass emissions rate will be
made based on the analyses.
Based on this understanding of the wok the following additional tasks have been
identified:
J0.11.20.1998 3:21PM CAIP DRESSER MCKE:E CPRLSBCkD N0.717 P.4,11
CiDM Camp Dresser&McKee inc _ . .
! I&David Ludwin
January 20,1998
i Page 3
f
■ Revise blends to reflect the emissions caps,and determine time to reach limits;
! ■ Analyze the treatment plant scenarios with and without GWR System impacts;
■ Revise facilities needs and cost estimates;
■ Revise calculations to accommodate impacts on primary effluent filtration,pure
oxygen/air evaluation,odor control,disinfection and bfosolids;and -_---
■ Revise portions-a the tufts Tor Volume 4,Joint Trea—ft att Works,Volume 6,
Level of Treatment,and Volume 8,Biosolids Management.
3. CSDOC Operations and Maintenance treatment coats to support GWR System.
Ij
;I Fran the response to Item 2 in CSDOCs letter,it is understood that CSDOC will not
! incur further capital costs for construction of secondary facilities to support the delivery
it of suitably-treated water for the GWR System. Previously,it had been assumed that
additional facilities would be constructed to provide adequate quantities of secondary
j effluent to the GWR System.
The assermption that CSDOC will incur all operation and maintenance costs for the
secondary treatment required for the GWR System will not change;however,operation
and maintenance costs will change based on the decisions outlined in Item 2,
Based on this understanding of the work,the following additional tasks have been
identified;
■ Rerun all GWR scenarios;
■ Revise facilities needed and cast estimates;
i ■ Revise cost estimates for disposal options;and
■ Revise portions of the drafts for Volume 3,Collection System,Volume 4,Joint
Treatment Works,Volume 6,Level of Treatment,and Volume B,Biosolids
Management
4. CSDOC participation in GWR System capital cost sharing.
i
! Presently,CSDOC will only participate in the capital funding for the first phase of the
j GWR System. This commitment will not exceed$130 million(half of the estimated
Phase 1 capital costs);this amount could be reduced by available grant funding. Since
the level of grant funding Is presently unknown,it will not be considered in project
. ralnilations.
-1 irN.20.1995 3:21PM CRMP DRESSER MCKEE CRRLSBRD NO.717 P.5/11 '
CDM camp D e,,,&McKee hi,
Mr.David Ludwin
January 20,1998
Page 4
As discussed in Item 2,CSDOC's objective will be to construct no additional secondary
treatment facilities to support the delivery of suitably-treated water for the GWR
i System. If other GWR System treatment or conveyance facilities are identified by the
GWR System consultant which need to be sited on CSDOC property,these costs will be
identified separately but will not be used for any cost comparisons.
Based on this understanding of the work,the following additional tasks have been
identified: -
■ Rerun all theGWXi"&rios;_"--
■ Revise facilities needed and cost"estimates;and
II ■ Revise portions of the draft for Volume 4,Joint Treatment Works,Volume 6,
it Level of Treatment,and Volume 8,Biosolids Management
5. "Plarmed"versus"emergency discharge"to the 784nch outfaif or the Santa Ana River
A (SAR).
Should CSDOC elect to utilize the 78'outfall and/or the Santa Ana River for excess
peak wet weather flows,CSDOC will discharge all of the available secondary effluent
iHess the amount being sent to the GWR System)to the 78-inch outfall or to the Santa
Ana River. During these peak wet weather events,primary effluent will be sent to the
120-inch outfall. The quantity and frequency of primary effluent discharges to the 78-
inch outfall or to the SAR will be detem fined. It will be assumed that no additional
secondary treatment facilities will be®wtructed to handle peak wet weather flows.
It will also be assumed that disinfection facilities will be needed to provide some form
of disinfection for all flows discharging to the 7&inch outfall or to the SAP, The form
and level of disinfection will be determined and outlined in a technical memorandum.
It is assumed that no dechlorination facilities will be required.
Based on this understanding of the work the following additional tasks have been
identified:
■ Reevaluate facilities needs and cost estimates;
■ Revise calculations to accommodate impacts on primary effluent filtration,pure
oxygen/air evaluation,odor control and biosolids;
■ Revise the cost information and rerun the decision model;
■ Revise portions of the drafts for Volume 4,Joint Treatment Works,Volume 6,
Tavel of Treatment,and Volume 8,Biosolids Management and
:1 3RN.20.1990 3:22PM CPMP DRESSER MCKEE CRRLSBgD N0.717 P.6i11
CDMComp D esscr&McKee Inc
Mr.David Ludwin
January 20,1999
Page 5
j ■ Review effluent disinfection facilities required for excess flow events,and revise
cost estimates.
6. Activated sludge facifitirs loading rates and concentration baud effluent quality
criteria.
CSDOC's letter of January 8,1998 did not specifically address the question of assuming
a more aggressive loading rate on the activated sludge facilities(with or without the — -
GWR System)., Our analysis was based4ti tine-assmnptiwn that the activated sludge--
facilities at Plant No.1 would be loaded at two different rates depending on the effluent
jl quality required. Operating with the GWR System a loading rate of 8 mgd/basin was
assumed to maximize effluent quality;without the GWR System,the basins were
j assumed to be loaded at a rate of 13 mgd/basin. CSDOC staff suggested that the higher
loading rate may be suitable with the GWR System scenarios since the GWR System
may not be as sensitive to higher TS$levels as previously indicated. As part of the
technical memoranda discussed in Activity B later in this letter,the various activated
sludge loading rates will be reviewed,and their potential impacts on the facilities
planning will be assessed.
1 The second issue of assuming a more conservative concentration based effluent quality
q criteria of a5 mg/1 was addressed in the January 8,1998 Letter as follows. Because the
1 selection of the individual design parameters for each treatment process have already
incorporated acceptable levels of conservatism,CSDOC does not feel that a further
limitation of the effluent quality is appropriate. Further,the decision of CSDOC to base
effluent discharge on a TSS mass emissions limit revolves this issue.
I
Based on this understanding of the work no additional tasks will be required.
i7. provide fidl-train"costs for each alternative.
CSDOC has suggested that full-train costs should be developed for all alternatives,not
simply the final preferred alternative;however,CSDOC does notwant the development
of these full-train costs to delay the completion of the Planning Advisory Committee
i (PAC)workshop process.
The purpose of the PAC workshop cost estimates is to enable PAC members to discern
the relative differences between scenarios;full-train(life-cycle)cost estimates are not
necessary to achieve this objective While the major capital and associated O&M costs
have already been taken into account,costs for other full-train activities,including
plant-wide systems and facilities,and common costs,such as technical support and
administration,have not been factored in at this stage of the evaluation These costs
JPN.20.1998 a:22PM CPMP DRESSER MCKEEE CPJZ SBW NO.717 P.7/11 '
I CDM cemP�&Lmcx elna e.
I .-+ w. .. .,,, .
Mr.David Ludwir
January 20,1998
Page 6
will be included in a final cost estimate for the selected preferred alternative,but their
inclusion during the PAC workshop process,when multiple scenarios and alternatives
are being evaluated,will increase project costs without providing significant
improvement in alternative analyses.
Based on this understanding of the work,the original approach will be maintained.
However,full-tiein costs will be presented during PAC2 Workshops.
B. Operate 2,__.._.—___ --. ---
�I This issue was not included in our December 1,1997 letter,but it has been discussed in
subsequent meetings with CSDOC.,We now understand that the existing secondary
t treatment facilities at Plant No.2 should not be decommissioned or"mothballed"but
should be available for service. Although not specifically stated,it is assumed that the
secondary facilities at Plant No.1 should also not be taken out of service.
This decision has several implications. First,a new pumping system may be needed to
return a portion of the secondary flows treated at Plant No.2 to the new GWR System
facilities next to Plant No.1. Second,the need to divert SARI flows from Plant No. 1 to
Plant No.2 to avoid possible quality issues may be eliminated because of the
introduction of such a return pumping system.
t Based on this understanding of the work,the following additional tasks have been
identified:
■ Analyze the treatment plant scenarios with and without GWR System impacts;
■ Review facilities needs and prepare a cost estimate;and
' ■ Review portions of Volume 4,Joint Treatment Works,and Volume 6,Level of
j Treatment.
Develop Technical Memoranda
To assist in confirming the fundamental assumptions and"building blocks"which have
' been used to develop the strategic planning effort to date,CSDOC has requested that a
' set of memoranda be prepared to document the technical development of the project
'These memoranda will incorporate work completed,previous correspondence,and the
insults of discussions and meetings with CM=staff. The specific areas for which
technical memoranda will be prepared are:
,
JPN.20.199B 3:23PM CAMP DRESSER MO(EEE CARLSBAD NO.717 P.9/11
w CDM camp rates&McKee lots .
Mr. David I,udwin " .. _, ` .• '�'n, fY. + a wN -
January 20,1998
Page 7
1. Disposal Samalro6
Technical Memorandum No.1 will summarize the development of the projected dry
weather and wet weather flows;the oatfall options;planning needs;and
operational strategies for nee of oudall options.
2. Basic Planning Assumptions
i Technical Memorandum No.2 will summarize the development of a variety of basic
planning assumptions used in the Strategic Plan including collection system
I performance;in-line storage;wastewater composition;toxics loadings;chemical
usage;energy usage;and plant Watts usage.
I3. Cost Estimates--....-
li Technical Memorandum No.Swill provide the background for the development of
project cost estimates including information sources;cost estimating methodology;
it and present worth calnilations.
IIf`` 4. Pretreatment
S Technical Memorandum No.4 will summarize the assumptions used in the
SSSS development of pretreatment basis of design.
5. Treahnerrllhou6ses
Technical Memorandum No.5 will discuss assumptions and summarize the
development of the technical bases of design for the wastewater treatment processes
} including primary treatment;primary effluent filtration;secondary treatment;and
air quality
i 6. Solids
Technical Memorandum No.6 will document major assumptions and development
1 of the bases of design for solids processing including digestion and dewatering.
tI 7. Biosolids Management
Technical Memorandum No.7 will summarize the development of biosolids
management including assumptions;biosolids quality;transportation;and
disposal/reuse.
i
j Additional PAC2 Workshops
The RAC workshop process was completed in October 1997. The PAC process,to review
the peak flow management plan,will be completed this spring. It is now believed that
continued public participation,beyond the original mission of both the RAC and the PAC,
will be required through the completion of the strategic planning process. A new
committee will be formed(Planning Advisory Committee 2,PAC2),which combines the
members of both the RAC and the PAC. The intent of this committee is to provide input
and feedback for the following three steps: final development of the preferred alternative,
i
JAN.28.1998 3:23PM COMP DRESSER MCK=E CRRLSBiD ND.717 P.9/11
CDM Camp Dresser&McKee In,
Mr.David Ludwin
January 20,1998
Page 8
development of rate impacts from the final Capital Improvement Program,and review of
the environmental documentation
For this continued program,it is envisioned that three PAC2 workshops would be needed
to review information concerning the topics outlined above.
Revisions to COIIecBon System
In a letter dated December 17,1997,(SDOC requested that modifications be made to the
collection system model.-These modifications pertain to-the-redevelopment of the MCAS
Tustin and the relocation of the Gisler Redhill Trunk Sewer. We have developed an
estimated budget and schedule iP accommodate these revisions to the model per your, -.
II request.
II Based on this understanding of the work the following additional tasks have been
identified:
■ Modify dry and wet-weather hydrographs(1998,2000,2010,2020)
■ Identify new load points
■ Incorporate new sewers
■ Analyze impact of changes to the adjacent collection systems
■ Rerun the effected Plant No.1 tributary sewer model
■ Rerun the Plant No.1 diversion and interplant models
j ■ Reevaluate Main Street and College Avenue Pump Stations based on new
` configurations .
■ Revise deficiency analysis(1998,2000,2010,2020)
■ Revisit street impact issues and constriction cost estimates
a Modify text and figures in Volumue 3,Collection System
Supplemental Rates and Charges Services
Although the majority of the work under Project J 0-2 has been completed,there are a
number of unresolved issues which must be addressed In addition,CSDOC staff has
requested assistance in a number of specific areas as described below:
JRN.20.1998 3:24PM CRM? DRESSER MODE CPRLSBAD N0.717 P.10/11
CDM Camp Dresser&McKee lru.
Mr.David Ludwin
January 20,1998
Page 9
I
1. Commercial Categories
This activity will further refine commercial categories,update the rate structure,
determine appropriate user charges;and develop a comparison of user charges with
Los Angeles CM and the City of San Diego,
2. Armval Payment of Connection Fees
This activity will develop a plan to implement an annual connection fee for
industry;establish qualification criteria;and modify the rate structure to include
these annual connection fees
II I Equufvalerrt Dwelling llydf Flow Verification
This activity will investigate and resolve the discrepancy between the&DU rate
currently used by CSDOC for capital projects projections and the rate which
resulted from the 1-40-2 work and incorporate any Changes Into the rate structure
model.
4. Wet Weather Flow Costs
This activity will develop criteria to shift wet weather flow costs from commercial/
industrial users to residential users;and incorporate any changes into the rate
structure model.
5. Tiered Itesidential Camtretion Firs
I This activity will develop criteria for a tiered residential connection fee,and
li incorporate any changes into the rate structure model.
6. Rate Stmctarc Model btstmatim Maruual
This activity will update the Rate Structure Model Instruction Manual.
7. Meetings
This activity will provide time to attend four two-hour meetings to complete
Activities C1 through C6;and participate in two FAHR meetings.
The requested changes will require the development of new hydrographs,the analysis of
system impacts,and the revision of a significant number of figures and tables.
A set of spreadsheets is attached which details the estimated labor hours and total costs for
performing the work as described above. These costs are summarized in the following
table:
SW1.26.1999 3:24PM CF"P DRESSER MCIEEE CARLSBAD MO.717 P.11/11
CDM Catrp Dresser&McKee Inc.
Mr.David Ludwin
January 20,1998 1
I Page 10
t
Summary of Estimated Casts forAddondur,No.2
CDM
CDM hoof ConsumnS Subeonsultant Mod Taint
ACOydy Hour, SeMeas• Coat Profit Cost
Planning Issues 1,281 $154,852 $D $15.267 $170,139
Technical MamDmnde 070 $09,590 $11,200 $3.838 $109,668
III PAC2 Workshops .. .. _ _ _.543,74@ __ ___..$0_. $4,220 $46,969 --._
� Collection System 194 $17,772 $0 $1.764 $19.526
Sup9lemeotal Sale" ""' - " '19 ,<049 $47.908 $261 461JOiN
Setvicee
Totals 2,709 s307,751 $59,109 $90,9M 6397,2.99
Includes labor and other dlreot costs.
Please review the inforawtion in this letter and contact me if you or your staff have
questions. CDM looks forward to performing these important strategic planning tasks and
in completing the Strategic Plan
Very y ours,
Pt
M INC
eneM.B
Vi a President
001'C:dmV.I=D1RASEZMISCLTRMt 15I®DLLTR
x: Jim Herberg/CSDOC
Paul Gustafson/CDM
Kevin Schmidt/CDM
Marco Linden/CDM
Heather Boyle/CDM
Ed Fembadh/CDM
I
FAHR COMMITTEE N"°"°°° TO am.
mnt/as otixarve
AGENDA REPORT l mNumW Ie
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
SUBJECT: Award of Contract, Job No. 132-70, Replacement of Construction
Management Trailers at Plant No. 2 (All Districts)
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Authorize award of a contract for Job No. 132-70, Replacement of Construction
Management Trailers at Plant No. 2, to Space Leasing Company, Inc., in an
amount not to exceed $163,989.
SUMMARY
On January 13, 1997, the Plant No. 2 Construction Management Trailer complex
was destroyed by a structural fire. This item requests authorization for award of
contract to Space Leasing Company, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for
replacement of the trailers destroyed by the fire.
PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
The proposed contract with Space Leasing Company, Inc., is in an amount not to
exceed $183,989. Total project costs exceeding the self-insurance retention are
eligible for reimbursement under the Districts' All-Risk Property Insurance
Program.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This item has been budgeted: CORF, Misc. Improvement Projects at Plant 2.
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
Kb ftftQ1�AAW MFpBUAMFANgG 7D
a 1m7a7 Page 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
On January 13, 1997, the Construction Management trailer complex, located in
the east parking lot at Plant No. 2, was destroyed by a structural fire. After
reviewing alternatives for replacing the lost Construction Management office
space, it was decided to procure and install replacement trailers at the same site.
Engineering/Small Projects staff completed design work, prepared plans and
specifications, bid and contract documents. In November 1997, six (6) interested
bidders received bid documents.
On December 2, 1997, three (3) responsible bids were received. The bids
ranged from a low of$183,989, submitted by Space Leasing Company, Inc., of
Fontana, to a high of $212,477. The engineer's estimate for the project was
$230,000.
Contract documents have been completed with Space Leasing Company, and
approved by the Districts' Purchasing Contracts Manager. The Districts' All-Risk
Property Insurance broker and claims manager have been kept informed of
progress on this project. Staff hereby requests authorization for award of
contract to Space Leasing Company, Inc. The estimated project completion date
is March 5, 1998.
ALTERNATIVES
None.
CEQA FINDINGS
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1 . Bid Summary
SK:lc
11.w tl ftUlftmroWAHWMRIVAWAHgp Tp
R.A..a IMM Page 2
December 2, 1997
11:00 a.m.
ADDENDA: 1
BID TABULATION
Job No. P2-70
PROJECT TITLE: Replacement of Construction Management Trailers at Plant No. 2
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Construction Management Trailers at Plant No. 2
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $230,000. BUDGET AMOUNT: Reimbursement by Insurance Co.
_ TOTAL
CONTRACTOR BID
1. SPACE LEASING $183,989.00
2. RESUN LEASING $212,477.00
3. BRANDALL MODULAR $205,000.00
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the abov"oject and find that the low bid is a responsible
bid. I,therefore, recommend award to Space Leasing 1Athe bid amount of $183,989.00
as the lowest and best bid.
David A. Ludwin,P.E.
Director of Engineering
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\P2-70\BIDTAB.DOC
CSDOC • P.O.Bar 8127 •Fountain VaiNf,CA BZ728-0127 .(714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I To x.eaR.
1/28/99 I/29/96
AGENDA REPORT IRMft^ tteyrbff
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
FROM: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineed
Prepared by: Bob Chenowith, Project Manager
SUBJECT: Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-33-1
Bid date: January 13, 1998
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
1) Approve Addendum No. 1 for the Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-33-1, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary;
2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation.
3) Authorize award of contract to Jerrold Corporation, in the total amount of
$ 29,813.00.
SUMMARY:
The existing wood fencing along Pacific Coast Highway at Bay Bridge Pump Station,
constructed in 1992 under Job No. 5-33, has deteriorated from outside elements and is
in need of replacement. Access to the pump station from Pacific Coast Highway is
extremely difficult for District's maintenance personnel.
The proposed plan will remove the old fence and install a new masonry block wall with
stucco exterior to match existing pump station color and texture. This project will
enhance the property and make the pump station blend in with the surrounding
buildings. There will be three painted aluminum access gates. One will be for
maintenance personnel access to check the pump station and the other two will be for
maintenance trucks and equipment.
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications provided technical clarifications to the
plans, including the limits of removal of existing facilities.
Hw geb 72Wwwm INR 01
R.,,.., ,nnnr Page 1
PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY: The Engineer's estimate for construction including
Addendum No. 1 is $38,000.00. On January 13, 1998, ten bids were received for said contract.
The bids ranged from a high of$62,499.00 to a low of$29,813.00, submitted by Jerrold
Corporation.
Staff recommends approval of this contract to Jerrold Corporation in the amount of$29,813.00
and approval of a new budget totalling $55,000.00 for this project as shown on the attached
Budget Information table. A complete bid tabulation and recommendation is attached.
BUDGETIMPACT
® This Item has been budgeted. ( LINE ITEM: EARTHQUAKE/FLOOD AND FIRE
RESERVES )
❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds.
❑ This item has not been budgeted.
❑ Not applicable (information item)
CEQA FINDINGS: Notice of Determination was filed July 20, 1989 under the
Programmatic EIR for the 1989 Master Plan.
ATTACHMENTS :
1. Bid Tabulation and recommendation.
R M W�l�nIAiRW
Rm ,a,W Page 2
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1
1997-1998 FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
PROJECT/TASK APPROVED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZED TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO
BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED FUNDS DATE DATE)%)
STAFF DESIGN $ 6.500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ $ 6.500.00 $ 4.800.00 74%
CONSTRUCTION $ 38.000.00 NA $ 29.813.00 $ 29,813.00 $ 0%
STAFF CONSTR.
MGMT $ 10,500.00 $ 10.500.00 1 $ $ 10.500.00 is 1,200.00 11%
TOTAL 1 $ 55,000.00 $ 17,000.00 1 $ 29,813.00 $ 46,813.00 $ 6,000.00 35°h
H\wp. Wbng�ng&33-1agcndaW Mls
January 13, 1998
11:00 a.m. /
ADDENDA:
BID TABULATION
Contract No. 5-33-1
PROJECT TITLE: Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: 5.33.1
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $38.000 BUDGET AMOUNT:$
TOTAL
CONTRACTOR BID
1. JERROLD CORPORATION $29,813.00
2. SOUTHLAND CONSTRUCTION $30,000.00
3. VERNE'S PLUMBING $36,700.00
4. LLOYD ENGINEERING $37,885.00
5. UNITED BUILDERS $40,625.00
6. ATLAS-ALLIED $41,580.00
7, WAKEHAM-BAKER $45,045.00
8. ULTIMO CONSTRUCTION $58,421.00
9. LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING $61,800.00
10. AUSTIN COURT $62,499.77
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible
bid. I, therefore, recommend award to JERROLD CO TION in the bid amount of $29,813.00 as
the lowest and best bid.
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
N:1W P.DTAIENG%ENG75-33.11BIDTAB.M
CSDOC 40 P.O.Box 0127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411
1/13/98 BID TABULATION
BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1
JERROLD CORPORATION SOUTHLAND CONSTRUCTION VERNE'S PLUMBING
Item Approx. Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
No. Price Price Price Price Price Price
1 Lump Sum L.S. $ 500.00 L.S. $ 5.000.00 L.S. $ 500.00
2 Lump Sum L.S. $ 29,313.00 L.S. $ 25.000.00 L.S. $ 36,200.00
Subtotal $„29,81300' .S r30,000'.00
'Add (+) or Delete (-) $ - $ -
Total Amount of Bid $'29,813.00 $130,000,00 E. .. ,700.00-
JERROLD CORPORATION SOUTHLAND CONSTRUCTION VERNE'S PLUMBING
LLOYD ENGINEERING UNITED BUILDERS ATLAS-ALLIED
Item Approx. Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
No. Price Price Price Price Price Price
1 Lump Sum L.S. $ 455.00 L.S. $ 1,750.00 L.S. $ 2,000.00
2 Lump Sum L.S. $ 37,430.00 L.S. $ 38,875.00 L.S. $ 39,580.00
Subtotal :$47 885,60 $1,,40;825bl) .$ 4j 580.00:
'Add (+) or Delete (-) $ - $ -
Total Amount of Bid $z37,685.00 $ 40,625.00
LLOYD ENGINEERING UNITED BUILDERS ATLAS-ALLIED
H:Wp.dla)en&ngLS lBldab As
1/13/98 BID TABULATION
BEAUTIFICATION OF BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION
CONTRACT NO. 5-33-1
WAKEHAM-BAKER ULTIMO CONSTRUCTION LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING
Item Approx. Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
No. Price Price Price Price Price Price
1 Lump Sum L.S. E 5.00 L.S. E 1,200.00 L.S. E 3,400.00
2 Lump Sum L.S. E 45.040.00 L.S. E 57,221.00 L.S. E 58.400.00
Subtotal sA.4 045.00 '$16,'421b0 S' .. 81';800.00;
'Add (+) or Delete(-) E - E - E -
Total Amount of Bid E''45;045.00- $'58;421:00; $" 81:I F*ixt.
WAKEHAM-BAKER ULTIMOCONSTRUCTION LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING
AUSTIN COURT
Item Approx. Oty Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
No. Price Price Price Price Price Price
1 Lump Sum L.S. E - L.S. L.S.
2 Lump Sum L.S. E 62,499.77 L.S. L.S.
Subtotal E'82,499,77.
'Add (+) or Delete (-) E -
Total Amount of Bid E'82,499,774
AUSTIN COURT E - E -
KWI,dlabn&ngLS33-1 Bldlab ds
y Board or Directors
�f�,GNfAtli ,�- j 7,4 GJemes V. Evanrson
Joy L Neugebauer
Russell C. Paris
Margie L Rice
January 21, 1998
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA
Attn: FAHR Committee
Re: Proposed Inter-District Borrowing and Lending Program
Gentlemen:
The Board of Directors of the Midway City Sanitary District opposes the
proposed plan to make short-term loans available to District Nos. 1 and 11 from
District Nos. 2 and 3 funds.
Our District representative has been directed to vote against any borrowing and
lending program to provide inter-District loans.
Sincerel
/01
Russell C. Paris
President
14451 Cedarwood Avenue • Westminster, California 92683 • (714)893-3553 • Fax(714) 891-8624
JAN-21-90 WED 10:57 AM U"BRN 1A111 INST 1714760607E P.01
`�.� �d��f`i�weawe�armx6a6abNw
FAX COVER SHEET
URBAN WATER INSTITUTE, INC.
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
(714) 760-6071 ➢x (724) 760-6013
DATE: January 19, 1998
FROM: URBAN WATER INSTITUTE
WORKSHOP/Workshop DEPARTMENT
TO: Penny Kyle
Clerk of the Board.
SUBJECT: UP-COMING WORKSHOP/Workshop NOTIFICATIONS
"Technology 6 Exotic Water Resources"
NO# SHEETS
FAX# 714-962-0356
PHONE 714-962-2411
RRNARKSI Dear Penny,
Please add the Urban Water Institute's Workshop invitation to
your agenda for the next Board of Directors meeting. As
members or potential members of the Urban Water Institute, the
workshop Works as a vital and informative tool essential to
your board on current information on water issues facing our
entire state an well as the Southwestern United States. As
members of the Institute all board members and staff are
entitled to registration discounts. If interested in
information about membership or the workshop, please call the
Urban Water Institute at the number at the top of this page.
Thank you for your consideration
JAN-21-99 WED 10:50 AM URBAN WATER INST 17147606073 P. 02
URBAN WATER INSTITUTE WORKSHOP & EXHIBIT
"NEW TECHNOLOGY AND EXOTIC WATER RESOURCES"
A Non-technical Workshop for the Water and Wastewater industries
NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE
CO-SPONSORS
February 26, 1998
Sheraton Industry Hills Resort - City of Industry
7:30 a.m. Registration - Continental Breakfast
Exhibits open
8:30 a-m. Keynote - The Value of water
Ronald Linaky, Executive Director
National Water Research Institute
How much can we afford to upend on new technology for the treatment
and recovery of water/wastewater, brackish water or seawater?
First, we need to know the value of water.
9:00 a.m. A Consultants' "Braintrust" Discussion.
Moderator - Robert Siemak, Vice President
Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.
David Harrison, Vice President
Montgomery Watson, Inc.
Paul Brown, Senior Vice President
Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.
Kevin Hunt, Corporate Director
Psomau & Associates
Bruce Mowry, Phd. , Senior Project Manager
CH2M Hill
What are the emerging issues facing the water and wastewater
industries in the 21st Century? What is the need for new
technology? Are the water and wastewater industries all one
industry now? Are we organized to meet the future challenges?
10:00 a.m. Break - Visit Exhibits
10:30 a.m. What Are Public Agencies Doing to Most
Challenges of The Next Century?
Ed Means, Assistant General Manager, Metropolitan
Water District of Southern California
Paul Jones, General Manager
Central and West Basin Municipal Water Districts
William R. Mills, General Manager
Orange County Water District
Blake Anderson, Asst. General Manager, Operations
Sanitation Districts of Orange County
JAN-21-98 WED 1e :se AM URBAN WATER INST 17147606073 P_ 03
How Can the separate imported water, wastewater and groundwater
agencies begin to work together to take advantage of new
technologies? Can water and wastewater agencies move forward
without the help of private industry? what is the role of private
industry?
11:30 a.m. What is Happening at the Federal Level?
Stan Ponce PhD, Director of Research
U.S Bureau of Reclamation
How is the federal government contributing to new technology needs
on the one hand while EPA and other agencies make more stringent
requirements for Safe Drinking Water?
12:00 noon Lunch Break
12:30 p.m. Luncheon Speaker
David White, M.D. , Professor of Microbiology,
University of Tennessee
The human immune system and the future of water.
1:00 p.m. Dessert break - Visit Exhibits
1:30 p.m. What Help Are We Getting From Private Industry?
Moderator - Ron Lipsky, Executive Director
National Water Research Institute
David Furukawa, Separation Consultants, Inc.
Innovative New Reverse Osmosis Process
Lloyd Luthringer, Carefree Water Products, Inc.
In-pipe Water Softening for Municipal Systems
(name to come) Calmon Inc. ,
Killing Pathogens With Soundwaves
Southern California Edison Co.
Electronic Approaches to Water Treatment
2:30 p.m. The Future of Techology
George Tehobanoglous, Professor, UC Davis
Author of "New Technologies in Wastewater Treatment"
3:00 pm. Adjourn to Reception - View Exhibits