Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1997-12-17
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA December 11, 1997 NOTICE OF MEETING phone: (714)9822411 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS manna address: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS PD. Box8127 NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 FO11"82 A sz)2B8 72M,C'D OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA atr EllisAanue WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1997 - 7:30 P.M. 1 aunu EllV Avenue Fvum92 Valley,CA sz7oByma DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member Ag°nC1i The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will C4JeB be held at the above location, time and date. Bre aneBron a Boars Park Cypress Fountain Valley O FVllertch Hantinawn Bane and S cretary Le Habra La Palma Los Alamitaa Newport Beach Orange Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Placentae Bale Ana SeelBeach Bento wmo n rua STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 17, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. Villa Parkrk Yarba urns AD HOC COMMITTEE RE: County of Orange STRATEGIC PLAN - Thursday, December 18, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. sanitary Districts PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Thursday, January 15, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. c°sra Mesa NEW DIRECTORS ORIENTATION Garden Grave Minway gty (Tentative) - Saturday, January 17, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. water Districts STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, January 28, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. Irvine Ranch JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING - Wednesday, January 28, 1998 at 7.30 p.m. A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency G.—toed to Prarecuna the Environment Since 1954 �n JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month _ . .Joint Board Meeting January January 28,.1998 February _ February 25, 1998 March Marb425, 1998 " April April 22, 1998 May May 27,"1998 June June 24, 1998 July July 29, 1998 August - August 26, 1998 — September September 23, 1998 October October 28, 1998 November November 18, 1998 December December 16, 1998 January January 27, 1999 AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 17, 1997—7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary, In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion '.. and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there '.. is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 12/17/97 Page 2 of 10 6. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 November 19 1997 District 2 November 19 1997 District 3 November 19 1997 District 5 November 19, 1997 District 6 November 19 1997 District 7 November 19, 1997 District 11 November 19 1997 District 13 November 19, 1997 District 14 November 19, 1997 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/97 10/29/97 Joint Operating Fund $1,156,262.17 $1,511,814.48 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 249.950.03 2,260,775.96 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 12,828.64 311,260.02 District No. 1 0.00 780.43 District No.2 3,971.88 1,740.59 District No. 3 13.851.43 7,571.73 District No. 5 0.00 197,299.00 District No. 6 0.00 0.00 District No. 7 23.570.34 0.00 District No. 11 6,800.00 397.96 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 31.467.234.49 54.29164017 12/17/97 Page 3 of 10 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a I Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar, The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 9. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, 'rf any. 12/17/97 Page 4 of 10 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 10, a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re December 17, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 19, 1997 to be filed. C. 1) Approve out-of-country travel by Nancy J.Wheatley; 2)Approve payment of registration fee in the amount of$575 for Nancy J. Wheatley for the Water Environment Federation's Technical Conference in Singapore, Asia. 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re December 3, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 3, 1997 to be filed. C. Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Pima Gro for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in a form approved by General Counsel. d. Authorize staff to enter into an amended agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in a forth approved by General Counsel. 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re December 4, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 4, 1997 to be filed. C. Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 with Advanco Constructors, Inc. For Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site and Security Improvements in the amount of$71,557. d. Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Job No. P1-36-2 with Margate Construction, Inc. For Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 in the amount of$69,628. 12im97 Page 5 of 10 ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 4) 12. e. Approve an increase in authorized funds of$188.000, bringing the project total to $1,208,400 to cover all anticipated costs required to complete construction of the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid). f. Adopt Resolution No. 97-37, Establishing Policies and Procedures for Selection and Procurement of Professional Engineering, Architectural, Environmental, Land Surveying and Construction Management Services; Approval of Plans and Specifications; Approval of Construction Change Orders, and repealing Resolution Nos. 90-43, 94-110, and 95-9. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re December 10, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 4, 1997 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 1997. d. Receive, file and approve letter dated November 6, 1997 from Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) requesting a waiver of late payment interest charges assessed by Districts'staff for treatment plant capacity. e. Adoption of a formal borrowing and lending program by the Boards of Directors of the individual Districts in order to provide for inter-District loans,with interest, while the Strategic Plan is being completed and a long-term financial plan is being prepared. 12/17/97 Page 6 of 10 Y 14. DISTRICTS 1. 2, 3. 5, 6, 7. 11 & 13 a. Public hearing relative to the following proposed Ordinances of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 of Orange County, California, amending ordinances relative to exemptions, rebates and refunds of sanitary sewer service charges: Amending �p istrict,l ,.OlrdiiiiiinceNo. Ordinance No. 1 134 133 2 224 223 3 327 326 5 535 516 6 630 629 7 737 736 11 1126 1125 13 1319 1303 1. Open hearing 2. Verbal report of General Counsel 3. Receive and file written comments, if any 4. Oral public comments, if any 5. Staff response to comments 6. Close hearing b. 1. DISTRICT 1 Ordinance No. 134, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California,Amending Ordinance No. 133 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1) Motion to read Ordinance No. 134 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous rote of Directors present); and, 2) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 134. 12i17i97 Page 7 of 10 ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 6) 14. b. 2. DISTRICT 2 Ordinance No. 224, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California,Amending Ordinance No. 223 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1) Motion to read Ordinance No. 224 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present); and, 2) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 224. 3. DISTRICT 3 Ordinance No. 327, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 326 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1) Motion to read Ordinance No. 327 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present); and, 2) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 327. 4. DISTRICT 5 Ordinance No. 535, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No, 516 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1) Motion to read Ordinance No. 535 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous rote of Directors present); and, 2) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 535. 12117/97 Page 8 of 10 % ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 7) 14. b. 5. DISTRICT 6 Ordinance No. 630, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 629 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1) Motion to read Ordinance No. 630 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present); and, 2) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 630. 6. DISTRICT 7 Ordinance No. 737, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 736 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1) Motion to read Ordinance No. 737 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present); and, 2) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 737. 7. DISTRICT 11 Ordinance No. 1126,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1125 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1) Motion to read Ordinance No. 1126 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present); and, 2) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 1126. 1 12/17/97 1 Page 9 of 10 ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 8) 14. b. 8. DISTRICT 1319 Ordinance No. 1319,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California,Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1) Motion to read Ordinance No. 1319 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present); and, 2) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 1319. DISTRICT 2 15. a. SELECTION COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the Selection Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 3, 1997 to be filed. b. Receive and file Selection Committee certification and approve Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver to design and prepare the construction documents for Replacement of Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate, Contract No. 2-40, in an amount not to exceed$54,981.00. 16. ALL DISTRICTS CLOSED SESSION. During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chair may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Boards take final actions on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Larry and Donna Anderson v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 773598 (Government Code Section 54956.9[a]). 12/17/97 Page 10 of 10 ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 9) 16. b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 17. Matters that a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 20. Adjournments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shah include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714)593-7130 or (714) 962-2411, ext. 7130 HAwp.dta\admin\13S%AG97\121797.doc JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT JOINT BOARD MEETING OF DECEMBER 17, 1997 1 . PLEASE BE SURE TO CHECK THE "NOTICE OF MEETINGS" IN YOUR AGENDA PACKAGE FOR UPCOMING MEETINGS. 2. THE NEXT MEETING OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN AD HOC COMMITTEE WILL BE TOMORROW, DECEMBER 18TH AT 5:30 P.M. ALL ARE WELCOME, BUT PLEASE LET US KNOW TONIGHT IF YOU ARE COMING SO THAT STAFF CAN PLAN FOR DINNER. 3. JUST A REMINDER THAT ALL OF THE WORKING COMMITTEES, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE, WILL NOT BE MEETING IN JANUARY. 4. THE NEW DIRECTORS WORKSHOP, ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR SATURDAY, JANUARY 17 BETWEEN 9 AND NOON, WILL BE RESCHEDULED. AT THIS TIME STAFF IS CONSIDERING SATURDAY, JANUARY 31ST. IF 1 YOU HAVEN'T ATTENDED ONE OF THESE ORIENTATION MEETINGS, PLEASE TRY TO ATTEND. IF THERE ARE NO, OR FEW NEW DIRECTORS, WE WILL SPEND THE ENTIRE TIME ON AN UPDATE OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN. 5. AT THE DECEMBER SARBS MEETING, SEVERAL EMPLOYEES WERE PRESENTED AWARDS. SIMON WATSON WAS NAMED MAINTENANCE PERSON OF THE YEAR; KELLY CHRISTIANSON WAS NAMED INDUSTRIAL AND HAZARDOUS WASTE (WE CALL IT SOURCE CONTROL) PERSON OF THE YEAR, AND CHLOE DAO (DOW) AND VLADIMIR KOGAN RECEIVED THE AWARD FOR RESEARCH PROJECT OF THE YEAR. THEY NOW GO ON TO COMPETE AGAINST OTHER REGION WINNERS FOR STATE AWARDS. z REPORT ON TONIGHT'S STEERING COMMITTEE 1 . STAFF PRESENTED SEVERAL SUGGESTIONS FOR A NAME CHANGE AFTER CONSOLIDATION TO MORE CLEARLY REPRESENT THE BUSINESS OF THE DISTRICTS. NO RECOMMENDATION IS BEING FORWARDED AT THIS TIME. 2. NANCY WHEATLEY, DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES, HAS HAD A PAPER ACCEPTED FOR PRESENTATION AT THE MARCH 1998 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION ASIA CONFERENCE IN SINGAPORE. THE STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS AUTHORIZING OUT OF COUNTRY TRAVEL FOR MS. WHEATLEY, AND PAYMENT OF THE $575 REGISTRATION FEE. IS THERE A MOTION? 3. THE DISTRICTS HAVE THREE MEMBERS THAT SERVE ON THE JOINT CSDOC/OCWD COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE FOR THE GROUNDWATER 3 REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM (GRS), FORMERLY THE OCR PROJECT. THERE HAVE BEEN TIMES WHEN THERE WAS A LACK OF A QUORUM. DIRECTOR BROWN HAS REQUESTED THAT THE GENERAL MANAGER BE APPOINTED TO SERVE AS AN ALTERNATE DIRECTOR. THE WATER DISTRICT HAS ALREADY TAKEN ACTION TO APPOINT THEIR GENERAL MANAGER AS AN ALTERNATE. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPOINT THE GENERAL MANAGER TO SERVE AS AN ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO THE JOINT CSDOC/OCWD COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE FOR THE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM 4. DON MC INTYRE, BLAKE ANDERSON, MIKE PETERMAN AND I ATTENDED A LABOR/MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING LAST WEEK. THIS COMMITTEE IS MADE UP OF THE THREE UNION REPRESENTATIVES, DON MC INTYRE, BLAKE ANDERSON AND MIKE PETERMAN. THE MAIN DISCUSSION ISSUES ARE TO DETERMINE A SYSTEM TO REVIEW DART RECOMMENDATIONS, AND TO ENSURE THAT LABOR AND MANAGEMENT PROPERLY ADDRESS MEET-AND-CONFER ITEMS. IT 4 ALSO PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS UNION AND MANAGEMENT CONCERNS AND TO KEEP THE LINES OF COMMUNICATIONS OPEN. s SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 17, 1997—7:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 3, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: 3. a. DISTRICTS 1. 3. 6& 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Agency District Active Director Alternate Director Cypress 3 Mary Ann Jones' Tom Carroll Costa Mesa Sanitary District 1, 6 &7 James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry Midway City Sanitary District 3 Margie L. Rice Russell C. Paris b. DISTRICTS 5. 6 &7 Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept resignation of Mayor Thomas Cole Edwards of the City of Newport Beach from the Boards of Directors of District Nos. 5, 6 and 7, and seating first and second alternates to the mayor, as follows: District Active Director Alternate Director 5, 6 & 7 Jan Debay John E. Noyes 5 John E. Noyes Jan Debay C. Consideration of motion to receive and file any minute excerpts received subsequent to preparation of supplemental agenda, if any HAwp.0a\agendM1997 Joinl Bmrd Agendo\121797wppegenda.doo STATE OF CAUFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on /a 9 19_, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on A/ 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this /7 day of , 19D. A Penny Kyle, ecr, ry of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California BSIFO..WR7A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA December 11, 1997 phona: (714)9622411 To the Chairman and Members mailing add,..: of the Joint Boards of Directors PD. Boa 8127 Pounwm vauey.CA 9272SZ127 Subject: Board Letter acres[address: 10844 Do Avenue roa,92 vans,,.CA The followingare items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 9erof11,CA Y Y 9 information on any of the items, please call me. El Nino Storm Report Member Agencies The Districts' two treatment plants successfully treated and pumped to the ocean a e peak flow rate of 503 million gallons per day(mgd) of wastewater on Saturday, close December 6, 1997, for about a one hour duration. Normal Saturday peak flows are 300 mgd. Anaheim Bred The Districts have had two previous storm events that had larger peak Flows, in Buena Park P 9 cypress January 1995, at 520 mgd and 550 mgd. The heavy rain fell early in the morning Fountain ualiey along the coast and moved through the Districts' service areas just before normal Fullerton daily domestic peak flows would occur. Hunung[on Beach Irvine to Habra Districts' staff implemented the Emergency Operation Center and put to good use the La Palms training recently received on responding to peak flow events. There were about 30 Loa rt Beach Districts' staff(mostly members of the Emergency Response Team in the plants, the Newport Beach ( Y 9 cY P ) Orange collection system, and in the Emergency Operation Center to assist the normal Placentia operation staff of 13. Santa Ana Seal Beach stanto Plant 2, at Brookhurst and Pacific Coast Highway had muddy water running into Tustin Brookhurst from the 40 acres at the north end of the plant. The water was soil laden, Villa Park and came from construction staging areas, not from sewage processing plant areas. Yorba Linda county of orange There was a spill of about 14,000 gallons in Tustin as the result of a surcharge in one of our sewers. Sewage backed up into two homes resulting in relatively little damage. ssnitary Districts One claim is expected to be submitted and will be handled routinely by our adjuster. Coals Mesa Staff is to be commended for handling a potentially serious problem so professionally. careen Brore Midway city The lessons learned and recommendations for changes in the Emergency Response Plan will be included in a report and reviewed with members of the Team. wemr Districts Irvine Parch Direct Dial Numbers for Executive Management Team The process of installing direct inward dialing (DID) for many of the office staff is underway. This system is being installed in an effort to reduce the number of calls the receptionist has to handle (upward of 1600 per day) and free her to perform additional duties. Please note the following changes: - - Don McIntyre 7141593-7100 Jean Tappan, Asst. 714/593-7101 A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed ro Protecting the Enwronment Since 1954 Members of the Boards of Directors Page 2 December 11, 1997 Blake Anderson 714/593-7110 Michelle Tuchman 714/593-7120 Penny Kyle 714/593-7130 Mike Peterman 714/593-7140 Gary Streed 714/593-7550 Ed Hodges 7141593.7200 Chris Dahl 714/593.7280 The 7141962-2411 general number will continue to be answered by the receptionist. I will include a complete list of DID numbers for the executive management staff as soon as the installation is complete. Fleet Inventory Update General Services Administrative staff completed an extensive fleet utilization study and recommended the sale of several Districts' vehicles. A few examples of these vehicles are: 1980 Superliners used to haul biosolids that cannot be used under new CHIP rules of the road new regulations; a commuter van with over 140,000 miles; several older, seldom-used pick-up trucks; and two vehicles that need major repair work. The fleet vehicles scheduled to go to auction were selected on the basis of age, mileage, maintenance problems, and frequency of use. This is approximately a 20% reduction of the current fleet inventory. Yearly fleet operations and maintenance costs will be reduced by about $50,000. Attached is an October 27, 1997 memo that provides an update on the fleet inventory. Congressional Support for Water Reuse Protects During the recently completed federal budget process for FY 97-98, funding for Bureau of Reclamation water reuse projects was relatively limited. Many projects (including the Sanitation Districts/Water District regional project) received no appropriations despite having been previously authorized by Congress. Projects throughout the and west and Florida were left with little or no funding for FY 97-98. In the absence of a significant change in heart on the part of Congress or more active sponsorship of these projects by the Administration, it appears that the outlook for future years is not hopeful. There are Members of the House of Representatives who have consistently supported water reuse projects and who share our disappointment over the lack of adequate funding. For this reason, twenty-eight of the Members recently signed a letter to Vice President Gore to ask for his support of funding in future years. A copy of the letter is attached. Representatives Kim, Packard and Sanchez, who represent portions of Orange County, signed the letter. off. s Members of the Boards of Directors Page 3 December 11, 1997 Pay for Performance The Board may recall that the Districts recently completed a broad banding study to decrease the number of overlapping job classifications while moving towards a pay- for-pertornance compensation system. The study recommended collapsing our existing classification structure from 160 to 70 job titles. It was also recommended that we explore merit or skill-based compensation system to reward employees for increasing their skill and/or performance level. It is evident that other governmental entities are exploring merit compensation systems as well. Traditional systems in government have compensated individuals on the basis of seniority and longevity. Attached is an article that explains how the County of Orange is introducing merit pay to their unions. Because pay-for-performance systems meet so much resistance from employee associations, the County of Orange is offering a bonus of up to 2% of a worker's annual salary to encourage their employees to make the change. As you know, we continue to pursue broad banding with our employees and expect to bring forward a recommendation on broad banding and performance pay in the Spring. Yee President Gore's Clean Water Initiative On November 25, Blake Anderson spoke at an EPA/USDA field hearing in Sacramento on behalf of AMSA and the Districts. Attached is a copy of his comments. Consensus Reached at EMT Retreat Attached is a copy of the Consensus Statement that staff created at the EMT Retreat, which was held October 15-16. This statement will be provided to all employees in an effort to explain our continuing commitment to being best in class by encouraging employee involvement. Santa Ana River Basin Section (BARBS) of California Water Environment Association (CWEA) The BARBS of CWEA recognized two staff and one research project at their Saturday, December 6, 1997 annual banquet. Kelly Christianson was recognized as the"Source Control Person of the Year," and Simon Watson was recognized as the "Maintenance Person of the Year." Mad Kogan and Chloe Dao won the Best Research Project award for the Scrubber Automation research done and implemented by the Districts. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 4 December 11, 1997 Tour Guide Program a Success The Communications Department implemented a Tour Guide Program in October to assist with the increasing number of requests for plant tours. Forty employees from throughout the organization volunteered for the program and successfully completed a two-session training program on how to conduct tours, group management skills and safety practices. With an average of five tours a week, Communications has relied heavily on our newly trained Tour Guides, and the results have been very positive. Without exception, volunteers have received "above averagelexcellent" ratings on the Treatment Plant Tour Survey cards, which are filled out by each tour participant at the end of their visit. The program has also enabled us to better meet the information needs of special-interest groups due to the diversity of our tour guides' backgrounds and areas of expertise. And, we are hearing good things from our guides, who provide a maximum of one tour per month. Many have commented on how much they enjoy meeting the customers we serve. Recent visitors include the League of Women Voters; Costa Mesa and Garden Grove Sanitary Districts; Garden Grove and Anaheim Public Works Departments; microbiology and engineering classes from CA State Long Beach, Goldenwest, USC, UCI, CA State Fullerton, Rancho Santiago, Loyola Marymount, UC Riverside and the College of Instrument Technology; local school groups; and scout organizations. We have also toured visitors from Korea, the Far East and Brazil. The following are comments we have receive on the Treatment Plant Tour Survey cards. We thought you might find them of interest. • It was great and much more interesting than what I had anticipated. I'm glad to know that property taxes are going to something so useful! • CSDOC is doing an excellent job in keeping our water cleaned. • When I found out we were going on this trip I thought it would be a dirty environment, but the facility was very well kept. • Impressed with overall engineering, efficiency and environmental sensitivity El Niflo Water Conservation Message As you may recall, the Communications Department has been working with the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles and the City of L.A. Public Works Department to develop an El Nino water-conservation campaign. Our goal is to 7 0 Members of the Boards of Directors Page 5 December 11, 1997 reduce the amount of flow coming into the plants during a major storm event when influent can increase as much as 200 percent due to rainwater inflow and infiltration. The three agencies distributed a joint press release on Thursday, Dec. 4, which was picked up by the Daily News. The Districts sent out a separate press release on Friday, Dec. 5, under the headline, "if It's Storming on Saturday, Please Don't Do Laundry Asks County Sanitation Districts of Orange County." That release was picked up by CBS, NBC, KTLA and OCN, all of which ran the story Friday night and all day Saturday. KFWB and OCN also broadcast telephone interviews with Michelle Tuchman on Saturday. Groundwater Replenishment System (formerly OCR)— Public Affairs Issues The Joint Cooperative Committee and staff are working with Adler Public Affairs to finalize the Groundwater Replenishment System information materials that will be distributed to the media within the next few weeks. Those documents include a press release, fact sheet, briefing paper, and questions and answers sheet. You will receive advance copies of these documents prior to distribution to the media. Districts' Response to CaIPIRG Study As you know, OCN was at the Districts December 2 to get our reaction to a California Public Information Research Group (CaIPIRG) study. OCN interviewed Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, who refuted claims by the public-interest group that polluters are rarely fined, that fines are so lenient they don't act as deterrents, and that lax state enforcement has resulted in nearly 150 violations of the Clean Water Act by Orange Countys sewage-treatment plants. . Having OCN here was also an opportunity to discuss our nationally recognized wastewater treatment practices and the quality of the ocean waters off of our service area. The reporter ended the interview by emphasizing our two national EPA first-place awards, one for Outstanding Pretreatment Program, the other for excellence in Operations and Maintenance. Training Survey Sent to City Managers The Districts' Training division recently sent out a survey to each City Manager looking for interest in sending city employees to our training programs (see the attached survey). We currently share some safety-related courses with Irvine Ranch Water District and the Orange County Water District. By increasing the volume of attendees per training course, the Districts can significantly reduce our costs. D. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 6 December 11, 1997 Summary Budget Fiscal Year 1997-98 1 have attached a brochure that summarizes the Districts' budget for fiscal year 1997- 98. If you would like additional copies, please contact Michelle Tuchman at 714/593-7120. Articles of Interest Attached are articles that have appeared in various publications that may be of interest to you. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. HAPPY HOLIDAYS! Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt X Mp.JVWmmGM1O OtD L1 A121 i9).px Enclosures: October 27, 1997 Memo re Fleet Inventory Update October 31, 1997 letter to Vice President Gore re Bureau of Reclamation's Title XVI Water Recycling Program November 17, 1997 LA Times article, Pay for Performance Written Comments by Blake Anderson from November 25, 1997 Hearing on Clean Water Initiatives Consensus Statement from Executive Management Team Training Survey Summary Budget fiscal year 1997-95 Brochure Seven published articles of interest f Consolidation Efforts essential for our continued success. They are: The Districts was passage o speller this • ///'''��y year in seeing the passage of special Distrito' Reinvention- Implement � ,s,�r • /� \ ,,a a Ants n/i/pits �.r y+� allow uon(AB 76lidate our which will Team(DART) and Reinvention L/Ul/� 1`l (/�l/���L// / !i/C[// allow us to into our existing nine Team(DARE recommendations, districts into one. Consolidation will complete the Boards re on simplify governance structures,reduce the consolidation,restructure the re the size of the Board from 29 members to25, Engineering Departments organization due administrative processes,streamline a and practices,and develop additional decision-mating procedures,and strategies for continued operational Budget consolidate some accounting and auditing efficiencies. functions. Environmental Monitoring -Secure The bill was signed by Governor Wilson in the ocean discharge permit,provide July 1997. y 1s anticipated that the Districts technical support for the Balm Plan will coincide it consolidate in July he n w amendment,and restructure our fiscal year coincide with the beginning of the new Ocean Monitoring Program. fiscal year 199 7-98 Water Reclamation/Conservation- Work w the Orange County Water «( Sewer Service Fee District to to evaluate the impact of and Increases need for alarge-scale water In May 1997.a new user fee rate reclamation program and the scneduk was adopted that provides development of governance and financial structures to carry out such for gradual increases over the next five a project years for four of our nine districts beginning in fiscal 1997-98. The two Strategic Plan -Continue efforts to dismca m need o!the largest develop a plan which meets the future adjustments have voted to extend needs of our service area through their increases over a l0-year period appropriate capital investment and heginning this fiscal year,a move environmental stewardship. designed to ease the immediate impact of those increases on their resident. Application of Technology - Three of our districts require no Complete the Information Technology changes in their sewer service Strategic Plan.which will serve as the user lees guideline for all once and plant Under the newly adopted lee technology applications. 1RICTS F schedule,the average annual External Communications - relow the rate is¢LI L well Establish outreach programs for i of S18[.8 average Californiatoa study ate county,pry and other public groups Q tc of Sionsult according to a study at to increase promote awareness of the ing of ri the consulting firm of Black 8 Veatch. mission,promote understanding of s our future endeavors and to help build as K The last Districts rate adjustment was sponger working relationships. �+ in fiscal year 1992-93. Management Performance - r Continue to improve management IN Critical Goals performance by adopting adaptive We identified seven critical goals to be workforce strategies,utilizing achieved for fecal 1997 These goals performance-based budgeting and torm the framework of our efforts by refining she internal and external over the next 12 months and identify benchmarking programs. areas and activitln which we feel are County Sanitation Districts f. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County of Orange County, California I W 1 Ellis Avenue.Fountun Vallp,(A 97708 7,4-962-1411 ;soot The County Sanhacon D'umcts of Our Capital Outlay RevoMng Pond(CORf7 today tasks. The plan relies on a variety reflects our commitment to Orange County budget for fucal budget for fiscal 19986 $54.5 million. of tools,including the implementation of technological innovation. IT is the 1997-98 reflects our continuing efforts Funded by the nine districts comprising the plant and office automation,training an only department slated for growth to streamline the organization,reduce County Sanitation Districts,the CORF increasingly adaptive workforce.and over the next five years. operating costs and increase overall budget finances ongoing and proposed joint streamlining our administrative and efficiencies. To that end,we have placed works treatment and disposal system operational procedures. performance Review greater emphasis on workforce flexibility improvement projects. The Five-Year Staffing Plan will be through cross-training. Multi-disciplinary The last component of our teams,staffed by employees from all levels There is a n.mble decrease for fiscal 1998. reevaluated every year as some of the performance-based organization is a of the organization,are also taking an active We have eliminated 56.25 full-time assumptions used in our initial forecast compensation system that rewards role in identifying ways to improve equivalent(FTE)positions from fiscal 1997 may change over time. employees,p g ry1 g )z P authorized levels. While we were p yees,professionals and managers efficiency and producwiry. authorized to have 616 FTEs last year. based on their abilities to reach goals In addition,we decreased authorized we ended fiscal 1997 with 542.75. Organizational Changes fisfiscal year. at the beginning of every staffin levels and develo a Five-Year The maximum number of full-time We continue to refine our plans year. This system utilizes work g Ped plans c guide each employee on how Staffing Plan that will guide us through the equivalents we'll have this year is 559.75. organizational structure to better to reach specific goals and the tasks right-sizing process. We made reductions position the agency to meet future that fall under every goal. in contractual services and suppliES to hold « Strategic Plan demands. Notable is the formation costs to prior year levels. And,we are of the Information Technology(IT) The plan recognizes and rewards working to establish a new compensation The Districts is currently undergoing a Division as a department. Previously individual effort and gives employees program that encourages and rewards major strategic planning effort that will under the General Services primary responsibility for their individual efforts. define our goals,operational commitments Administration Department.IT will personal performance and The impact of some of these measures will and associated financial requirements assume an increasingly important role development. It also emphasizes the be immediate. The effect of others will for the next 10 years. in the years ahead as we move toward responsibility supervisors and take longer to realize. All of these activities plant automation. The move also managers have for supporting g The Strategic Plan revises many of the reflects the importance of computer employees'efforts. reflect a period of change for the Districts assumptions used to develop our Existing technology in our daily operations and as we strive to become more competitive planning document,including population in an increasingly competitive environment. and land-use projections,the level of building activity in our service area and • • - • - J�rr Budget Overview the volume of wastewater treated. IxrEBEsr �2. g DEBT PflOPEflrT Our two treatment lams,located in When completed later this fiscal year, sEMCE su°es,wo MEs p ru2s1. OPESxnONS sSa]Iz Wn the Plan will also provide an operations process in Valley and Huntington Beach, sis'..3sa process ter each dabout 245 y enerallons ted by and financial collection, treatment includingtand s review of our CAPITALS301700 es PEES wastewater each day generated by collection,treatment and disposal facilities, w500t�o0 M.M. 2.2 million people in central and northwest and a study of our ocean outfall system. Orange County. For fiscal 1997-98. « How Revenue is Spent we have budgeted$46.9 million to operate, IN Five-Year Staffing Plan maintain and manage our sewage treatment Our revenue ls spent on the cost of providing service,including employees'salaries, and disposal system. This is$400.000 less In the past,we have compared ourselves wages and benefits,debt service,our capital improvements and the cost of self-insurance. than expenses for fiscal 1996-97. with other publicly owned or operated wastewater treatment facilities of similar Summery joint Operating Expenses- 1996-97 vs. 1997-98 Budget The cost per million gallons of wastewater site and the results have always been treated,an industry-wide performance favorable. However,the results of a study Peiee°ro6-97 19%-97 r997ae measurement,will also be reduced for fiscal conducted in early 1996 were not as °itiv` ^""'I a„ag.t APPrm'ea Bvaaet 1998 to$525 from$530 for fiscal 1997. reassuring. We learned that our staffing sane:a w,gg SI IA57.010 $31.710.370 $30.922.400 levels when compared to privatized P1.o11 BF—fi. 6.1815M 5.755,305 6.166.u0 systems were slightly higher.and as a result, rmm1.vie:.w,ge,a fie^em: SnA39s% $37A6sb7s 5M.M.860 ys g N g C6uges'. S,E Drsmn, (IOA%.Om) (10271.951) (1008.820) we developed a Five-Year Staff Plan. rise,1,0,F,s,w,e,a w,ge, S26.95f590 $27.193.714 $26.0%.040 The plan relies on normal attrition to bring 01nm E.P 9AAa0 855.412 n5.930 us to staffing levels that more closely match 1^,,,ra,a 1.487.tt0 11320. 6 1.335.000 yg the levels of private-sector wastewater Co',z...A sen.,a, 3,927.3W .0 i:um s,9M� ti 2si,� 9 facilities while,at the same time,ensuring Nor_ss, Sets, 1,573,200 1.9372M 1.392.500 •� .,9' 4 4ti RFPv,BH .tu,, 1,171,200 3A%.085 3.%1.280 +'' : • operational efficiency within all areas of the Beserch a Monaor,� 2.501.900 2.149265 2.453,000 organization. Trmn,ng 714.M 665.360 801,680 IFF U0. 3.046.800 3.073.497 3.162,950 The Five-Year Staffing Plan a a blueprint for o,ne. UR.900 I.0%.621 1575.480 a new and streamlined organization that is �ue^'^Pa Ort,ea (4.402A%) (4.1%.132) (5,071.1%) ore efficient in the completion of our day- N ftoWErywrra W.M.000 $47264,146 $0.912A50 is 0 October 27, 1997 ' mm To: Ed Hodges Director, GSA From: Barbara Collins Senior Administrative Analyst Subject: Fleet inventory update The attached pages show vehicles which: • Have been returned to the Motor Pool by Departments/Divisions. • Are proposed for selling. • Must be replaced if sold. The net results of the reassignments and selling of vehicles are: 1. There would be a net decrease of nine vehicles from Departments and Divisions after the returns and after selling the suggested vehicles. 2. Four of the vehicles to be sold must be replaced with Motor Pool vehicles. 3. Engineering requests five carts to replace returned vehicles. 4. The vehicles on the attached list returned to the Motor Pool average over 41,000 total miles and the average age is over seven years old. During a discussion with Fleet Services' staff this morning, other suggestions were made for adding vehicles to the "Selling " list; there was also a suggestion for retaining a truck on that list. Please let me know of additional research you will require for this project. BAC H:\Wp.aatgza1241ftollinstemt up8ateAm CSDOC • PO Bor8127 0 Fountain Valley.CA 97728.9127 0 17141982d411 �P 0 Vehicles-which Divisionehave volmrtaril returned to motor pool and will be,motor` ool vehicles. ? r V-234 1986 FORD TEMPO SEDAN E49158 58666 3720/720 DESIGN ENGINEERI 1986 V-235 1986 FORD TEMPO SEDAN E49158 51983 3720/720 DESIGN-ENGR 1986 V-245 1986 GMC TON P/U E062090 18754 3790/730 Motor Pool 1986 V-246 1986 GMC TON P/U E062091 62432 3790/730 Motor Pool 1986 V-267 1987 FORD TEMPO E098703 29220 3790/730 Motor Pool 1987 V-277 1988 GMC VAN E078653 16,669 2530/530 TERRI JOSWAY 1988 V-278 1988 DODGE AIRES E092328 39,178 2520/510 PERSONNEL STAFF 1988 V-2891988 GMC 1/2 TON P/U C15 E078661 75131 37901730 Motor Pool 1988 V-293 1988 ISUZU 1/2 TON P/U E108529 32136 37901730 Motor Pool 1988 V-2941988 ISUZU 1/2 TON P/U E108630 50252 3790/730 Motor Pool 1988 V-295 1988 ISUZU 1/2 TON P/U E108531 41692 3790f730 Motor Pool 1938 V-326 1990 FORD VAN E-250 E080027 77,640 2460/430 VAN POOL 199D V-346 1991 FORD TEMPO E347386 40,017 37201720 D. ENG. 3720 P7 1991 V-355 1992 JEEP WRANGLER E345079 44,950 3580/630 LAB 1992 V-3701992 GMC CARGO VAN E358333 16,723 3550/620 TECH.SERVICES P1 1992 V-3891994 FORD 3/4 P/U 4X4 E000593 22,619 2230/230 WAREHSE-LAB 1994 V-390 1994 DODGE SPIRIT 4 DR E002684 25,527 3430/830 JOHN FINIAS 1994 17 Vehicles have been or will be returmed to the Motor Pool Vehicles to be'deleted'from the Beef based on'milea e`maintenance issues''aBd frequencyof use. V-165 78 FORD F700 DUMP TRUCK E71756 12,228 2460 MTR-POOL 1978 V-166 78 DODGE 314 TON PICKUP E721531 75,893 2460 AUTO SHOP 1977 V-185 MACK SUPER LINER E748946 83,589 2460 MYC-POOL 1980 V-221 1984 DODGE 3/4 TON E456382 87,419 3470 BILL MALIK 1984 V-225 84 GMC 1/2 TON P/U E466391 95,762 3440 OPERATIONS 1984 V-226 84 GMC 1/2 TON P/U E442295 27,183 2460 LAB 1984 V-227 84 GMC 1/2 TON P/U E442294 89,992 2460 PLT-MICE 1984 V-229 83 PLYMOUTH SEDAN E459296 92,753 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1983 V-231 1985 GMC 1/2 TON P/U E478319 60,166 3450 TERRY MATT. 1985 V-232 1985 GMC 112 TON P1U E478317 60,868 3420 RANDY HARRIS 1985 V-234 1986 FORD TEMPO SEDAN E49158 58,139 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1986 V-235 1986 FORD TEMPO SEDAN E49158 25,410 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1986 V-236 1986 FORD TEMPO SEDAN E49157 86,012 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1986 V-241 1986 GMC TON P/U E060337 89,914 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1986 V-242 1986 GMC TON P1U E060120 80,145 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1986 V-243 1986 GMC TON P/U E060130 75,770 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1986 V-2441986 GMC TON P1U E060123 40,495 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1986 V-252 1987 SUZUKI JEEP E078618 25,926 3430 OPER 1987 V-2531987 SUZUKI JEEP E078617 26,773 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1987 V-2561987 DODGE 3/4 VAN E071683 106,092 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1987 V-258 1987 DODGE DAKOTA 112 TON E0922 77,339 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1987 V-260 1987 DODGE DAKOTA 1/2 TON E0922 74,623 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1987 V-261 1987 DODGE DAKOTA 112 TON E0922 59,263 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1987 V-262 1987 DODGE DAKOTA 1/2 TON E0922 72,676 3580 LAB 1987 V-271 1988 SUZUKI SAMARAI JEEP E09231 32,835 3440 PLANT OPER. 1988 V-272 1988 SUZUKI SAMARAI JEEP E09231 15,076 3440 PLANT OPER. 1988 V-273 1988 SUZUKI SAMURAI JEEP E09231 29,105 POOL VEHICLE 1988 V-274 1988 GMC VAN E078649 29,694 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1988 V-275 1988 DODGE AIRES E092324 92,008 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1988 v V-276 1988 DODGE AIRES E092326 84,069 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1988 V-297 1989 JEEP WRANGLER E280032 49,122 2530 SAFETY POOL 1989 V-299 1987 CHEV. CELEBRITY E261970 95,595 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1987 V-300 1987 CHEV. CELEBRITY E261971 85,744 3440 DOUG COOK 1987 V305 1989 PLYMOUTH RELIANT E270452 99,558 2460 POOL VEHICLE 1989 V3141990 FORD RANGER E270540 97,295 3450 POOL VEHICLE 1990 V378 1993 GMC VAN E358372 139,581 2460 VAN POOL 1993 26 vehicles will he sold Vehicles wlflcH must ba=relaced�Yith�194tor-PobhV6fiiWg97�.- .,. V-221 1984 DODGE 3/4 TON E466382 V-252 1987 SUZUKI JEEP E078618 V-232 1986 GMC 112 TON PIU E478317 V-262 1987 DODGE DAKOTA 1/2 TON E092210 Engineering requests five carts to replace seven vehicles returned to the Motor Pool. Nov 07 97 04:07p xxxxx 1GH4 ifA�iir i1t "am *tuft �v-.-% 91Nt of lWattatmts tv a moms aa, e7i S MIS �}U,,o£ Ottoba 31.1997 ElowetbbMbeetfbt4 Jt. . VicePn6idcet OIAMm6Ww0lbCBWWiue waswA mn.DC 2ow1 Wmme wd3:eto e,�owttetmdp3p�fottfatbeltaraLbfJterJemWm'sndexw wale =117CW.Pmu-mm aedwoa ywtt sVpW fm dtc brdmlon oftloomlWkw fir tbe plastm in We AdmFdsamio;;'t FkW Yer 1999Bnag2 76roag616e7FtkXVI groga�tptmicyul and t*SFatW watatFwdCrCGE'.CtEc QJ�I!�ud 8mleT<we ike EaPoamnityto®aupwabl - . waWndmAdmeed Nam ptgcmb.ofttanapemrntoPmolmd vow sagpfiee.mmyof . .rbtcb ar hdwdfy 9%xAMP. wowte Ci tolr playivs an ioweldboyerificm lateW thedrmt mmwtwgawpP4Ydmeada to the wmtemVmwd Stew iaaemt�ffMire.edetnito o0y beaeEedatmtati�e. UFA awdy.&c m*uiW ofpombk wets mpptiawao wedady mc.W"eadd nbwg Wawa to%'aRt'�.�Pro'11a,,b�aLLov for meabetamtioq ueaimm and lameofmtmkg4 tab=W. datttes6c and eyriadoWlm�0vatafefnreviYyorne6pnMlk aar. 'thelbtafau* oppltaaiobf wladtbftstr el wand for W Puns ofgWEoolwet.pky9uaok t<'1noLYmb eod bifA*ey tutdaoa, 76aw ofaay Wwaw fwwa-pMeble wlkBdmte d'uaaiypadk mthedamod NaPambb wamfrdW wvt&R=d'ueodytedudq dr 9tolmtofhate3 eSbWAwer®ed btb&e ew4huowz Ibromeocm,WrttwmeatellY amal4roeseusea erwelwaaPPlyt.emef8 fiomeba bww demod,wlo'b®other,demeoe W depleted wnatma➢YtmNaced pyomdwete:bodoe 1e etowcdorbftddae mebe mdoad demand fmpltmplag leeddbbmmtbarew human l 6eee5tr,eantmmltlasbaxAt fiambarlog ninon ae&eble aad eor4�betlrewmee ofreetafor L� 'tbe 7We7M pm=w wlawWm&wimd-pan ofihd R6d=W®Ptalacbad AdjwmtemAdof 1992(pL 102.575)'end wr ammdedbytbdRxlcmlionRaycNPgmd WewCoaare rodeo Aetof1996(PLI0076Q, ntieptolpdmpbrvldafineoiottlal tbdeod btrestmmtbt9w erly etada otw4WI00Jet-4PMJ—ofW la25%o 6DVW wet of plaeoag daiae and avbehaeetiooe. Postal'Fm Note 7671 0� oae®e Poionee �e Face � AiC. Fma nuv 07 s7 04:07p xxxxx 1 G�4 p. e NOV- 7 - y jai iZ ,. n P03 Page 1 The Honorable Albert Cwc,Ir. Ge sddltim to No economic and emirotunmtll valve from water rajtllng projet".Use fnm ate quaru faWc rotate of the prof mm snake It a uwdtl Rr dada fedaN pwgrmm,. Imporhny, under Tbte XVI,m 1Fdaal funds an:aulbodud to be 69CAT on the operation and tnairAoypae of any finVtlm developd tudar das program Instead,water rsrycGng pwJtmt a the YWa Svl propam We meant W be seB•mstaining awe comuucted. As suds,for a shon4mn,Belle&den wrwrctment,a long•tany ongagg tmMicn to n&nat wata supply pmbknu can be aWeved. The creation of ecer pater Supply is alw a mmunble wlutlon,m Oval the federal gavwmwn wn see study wvu Its inititl Ctv�yields, The Bateau opRedumtbn'a osW ataicd tdssion Is'to nrwrsYt develop,and protect wgaW - TNated«auras in an cavbonmeadly and eeommiplly wood.eraser in the intrtpt vftbe Amaietnpubgu" ThoBuruuefocus on'mar,"scars W"resources In the tooa cMdeu wsy possible bas bee misend iebodget docunwma rod the Com mmitdona of gacWutioWs tutimony In both the House of BapMenlatives and the Scram. Tlcvcnhdess,the 8umu•s budges,espeda0y With ngwd to the Title XVI program dew not scan to RlleR this new Ruts on ncm=manage ml. We agree With the 8orceu off."Untatlon that.gmi°e was"policy in the wen man beWde watt/neyYling rm�w and wttarulon es major componrnsa Portlier,we 6adieve rLat thc'I81e XVI psogtam u ono etcher bra veldebt to help rM Burnu perform la scud mleioo ie s�oat- edbcdveendrosponnW%manna. N thn Admmisbman wmivoes to develop a budget for Flied Yew 1999,we tespecMdy rcqu=thgyou woh with the Bureau oflltsdw edoa Sad the Office of Mawgemmt sod Budget to inutile to S100 million the amtlbm of funds deGcmW m tier This XVl was M7,ug pmgnm in F4w vw 19M i, We apKadac your ongoing oonv RY enviwaemlally FeWN11ble programs tool,tot the Tide XVI Wtur recycling program TTaatyou Rt your wn8dmo m of our rmquuL •:xa i ( � W—. w ap/VV tNlt F r� a . f•r.. _ Y . . NOW 07 97 04: u8p xxxxx 1 L.f9 NDV— T- 9T FRI 33a39 r _ en Page Tree Theffunur cARMIOulq Jr. �Y+ Y�IIff r Haoonblc Ptealfl0 D.RdMo D"c ,Offs of uW Hr+d r li NL ..a i . N., 07 S? 04: 38p xxxxx NOV — T - 9T FRi 13 [ 39 P _ 05 "�"" AL/$ASMCAL LL4f OF MORA1S M R�UE1dCAM4 ll.% D[DI% SL(I IRAA—a'Cbos cin ,IrA,4 b blurM Cook ±� S;m AHD-s PAAdY TI*e Cuallinemm I�0.n�•• ICc F nGelP.- LNNAh -i x1m Gaq�y coti / ,;t t4 - YAMBA%ma c,.. G.1 bra LAcel.ci'o-a steomomm Iowa aw e-y by Wm T„Cx-AE 3j0$dbo (Zs:OiAM S -p Jmy Lcwis C. C. -may Aon P&AW4 c�n,CKN�1--DiCCbaA!Pont60 TE++�AT•-Y MaS$almgl b1A� �,..�S Se c.+H,ii S-�jION[0 HsteYo� oAK �a,..o —rym'.21d Ddlamf A. --Julian P044 a.o.�reexi — Samr= C HvtA VI)M --)Wb FADS TCQIL/WC�, '— Imc Human a,22.Y/Ca---�� Jnyyy�1{{d1dtS'tdCDDafid Ctl AFt 41> _ Ckwh6a, ->Ed PROW SRN f f4 c,d-i Na6Cy NJ* 'r %A - silver"wAyes FLOa,o4 — 144kftyt*AUMt T nc..5�+++creS-+�Bsnd S1s�amaa F�y PCk S Wk p(cc R� 'Fk-s-Rw.tm 7bxms Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings 777 Section Page # Date Subject es U ((I1�J97 Pay for performance fi overdue move toward advantage of p percent or more,on fiscal overdue move t. average, for public-secror workers That is how to view the both m California and nationwide, proposal, under consider- over employees in comparable pri- ation by the county Board vale-sector jobs. To be sure,public- of Supervisors, to urge county am- sector unions and other government - ployeestoagreetoallowtheirfuture employees generally contest such pay increases be tied to merit re- findings — but then one sees com- views by their managers, rather ments such as that from Orange than to equal, across-tbo-board in- County government union official creases. Frank Eley, that suggests he knows Unfortunately,the county believes his workers have a more generous a switch to merit-based pay will arrangement than their counter- meet so much resistance tram unions parts in the private sector.Objecting and others that it must offer a bonus to the pay-for-performance proposal, of up to 2 percent of a worker's anou- he said,"A Its of people are not going al salary to convince public employ- to be that trusting of management's em to make the change. opinion of them." It's hard to imagine that workers Wefi, private sector workers—at would rather accept a same-for-all least the non-unionized ones — by increase rather then be recognized and large cannot be indifferent to for individual effort, assuming a their own management's opinions of competent evaluation process is im- their work when seeking a raise. plemented. Why should it be different in govern. Part of the reluctance can be ment? traced to established practices in Granted, the county has not yet county government, where "merit" come up with the criteria by which pay increases in theory have been performance raises would be admin- part of the personnel system for istered—but there are plenty of es- years. tablished guidelines and practices to But the word was pretty much de- follow. Subjectivity can be greatly void of meaning,because across-the- mitigated and in fact,a good system board raises, taking no meaningful will force the organization to stay account of personal performance, focused objectively on worker per- have been the rule. formance,rather than be tempted to "We talked about the need for make pay and promotion decisions something more particularized to- based on personality traits,emotions ward individual achievement."says and the ever-elusive"chemistry"of financial analyst Bence Whitaker, relationships. recounting discussions of a special Indeed, "it's a more humanizing efficiency-audit panel that consid- approach to tie pay to performance," ered county reforms in the wake of Mr. Whitaker argues. "Under the the bankruptcy. "We talked about a union, omrsizo-fits-all system, the number of policy changes that would worst performing and the best per- make the county run more like a forming employees get the same business—although, unfortunately, raises. The incentives are reversed in the end the committee's mission from what they ought to be, so that got distorted and the final report the people who do the least don't get didn't include many of these recom- punished and the people who do the mendations." most don't get rewarded." In any case, the Idea of pay for performance is front and center with A merit system can be the begin- the supervisors now. And it's about 'ping of what should be a clear-eyed time. "It is an approach to pay in, analysis of what the county considers creases that has been gaining ground value inajob:What are the expects- in the private sector since the end of tions for yerformance and how well hyper-inflation, at the close of the are they being met? Jimmy Carter era," Mr. Whitaker Mr.Eley's union,the Orange Coun- noted. ty Employees Association, repre- At the same time,the perpetuation sents 11,000 of the county's 16,000 Of automatic increases in the public workers. If they refuse to join, the sector may help account for the phe- pay-for-performance program won't nomenon that analyst Wendell Cox be as beneficial as taxpayers de, has reported in several studies for serve.But even with a fraction of the the American Legislative Exchange county's employees involved, the Council—namely,a pay and benefit principle is established. EPA/USDA JOINT FIELD HEARING ON CLEAN WATER INITIATIVES NOVEMBER 25, 1997 CALIFORNIA STATE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 722 CAPITAL MALL SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA Remarks Made by Blake P. Anderson Assistant General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California and Representing the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) Good afternoon. My name is Blake Anderson. I am the Assistant General Manager of the Orange County Sanitation Districts in Southern California. I am speaking today on behalf of the Sanitation Districts and AMSA. You have already heard from other AMSA members at the two previous field hearings. As you already know, AMSA has provided extensive written comment and recommendations that touch on the 11 objectives of the Action Plan. I commend you to those comments for your later consideration. I would just say that from a Southern Califomia perspective,AMSA's recommendations make sense and should enjoy your consideration as you develop the supporting details of the Action Plan. I believe that the Action Plan is good news. We local agency folks are pleased to see EPA and USDA sitting together constructively to address non-point pollution issues that have remained unaddressed for far too long. After 25 years of significant progress in cleaning the nation's waters, it's now time to take stock in what remains to be done. AMSA and the other organizations that represent urban water pollution control efforts can help you in developing the details of the Action Plan. We are the practitioners. We are the experts. We are the people who have the practical experience of water pollution control. We do it on a day-to-day basis. We can be helpful to the regulatory agencies and non-point sources that will be embarking on 1 these new sets of initiatives. Please use our constructive advice and help as you move forward , on this 21st Century task. As we move to the next century, I believe that your initiative should be a precursor to the reauthorization of the Clean Water Act. To effectively deal with non-point sources, a new flexible partnership must be forged between federal, state and local governments that also includes urban and agricultural interests. Too often in the past, urban and agricultural interests have not been willing to sit together. I have a sense this has changed. So, as you move forward with your initiative, you must identify the institutional arrangements that will facilitate cooperative solutions. Again, I refer you to AMSA's written comments for details. Now, I'd like to get to my local story, and talk about the Santa Ana River Watershed, where I live and work. It's about 2,400 square miles, starting up in the San Bernardino Mountains and ending at the Pacific Ocean. There's an upper basin in which about 2 million people live and a lower basin where another 2 million people live. Highly urbanized, Orange County, San Bernardino County and Riverside County are the typical pictures of Southern Califomia. Roof tops as far as you can see. Pretty much typical Southern California. But there's another side of my watershed that few people know about. We also have the largest concentrated dairy herd in the country. There're more than 300,000 dairy animals living in less than 50 square miles in the middle of the watershed. I understand that's more animals than in all of Wisconsin. At one time, it was a logical place to have dairies. Some would say that it still is because of the proximity to the vast Southern California urban market. Unfortunately, the urban market has engulfed the dairies on all sides and the number of animals has increased as the land supporting them has decreased. This causes several problems. Problems that have 2 . gone unaddressed for far too many years. Three hundred dairy families own and operate the dairies—some large, some small, some rich, some just hanging on. Some are well managed and others need some help. The problem is this: There is approximately 1.5 million tons of manure on the ground today— much of it unmanaged. There is another 500,000 to 600,000 tons produced every year. That's a lot of manure. Our wastewater treatment plants that serve 2 million people produce only half that amount! The manure causes surface water quality problems,fish kills and horrendous odors—particularly after it rains. The salts, nitrogen compounds and oxygen demand of the manure and urine of the dairies are causing groundwater pollution problems, as well. Now, it would be easy for us urban folks or the regulatory community to simply waive our fingers at the dairies and direct them to clean up the problem. Easily said but, in fact, difficult to make happen. The political will of the state and the counties is simply not there to force change. Reasonable federal requirements to clean up the problem will be necessary. But, more importantly, I believe there's simply inadequate cash resources to fix the problem. The 1.5 million tons of manure on the ground is approximately a $30 million problem to fix—assuming a cost of$20 per ton to transport, process and use the manure. Could be somewhat less or could be somewhat more—but that's a reasonable ballpark figure. $30 million. Now there are 300 dairy farms in this area. That means there's an average one-time clean up cost of$100,000 per farm, plus ongoing manure handling cost for the new manure of about$35,000 per year per farm. Complicating this picture is the fact that many of the dairies are considering a move to the central valley of California. Larger, modem and more self-sustaining dairy farming makes 3 sense. But we could be left with a legacy of polluted surface and ground waters. It's frightening to think that others could be left holding the bag as the dairies leave the watershed. I believe that the size of the problem is so immense that the dairies by themselves—even if they were to develop willing cooperation—are not financially able to do so. This is where you and the Action Plan come in. It's just a matter of money. Money fixes most anything, if property applied. I believe that you must create an innovative financial tool box to help areas like the Santa Ana River Watershed dairies. Money will have to come from the dairies, too. But rash flow is tough for any farmer. They are asset inch and cash poor. At least some of them are. So, it will take federal and state grants and loans as a starter to solve the problem. But we ought to go further than that. You need to add the best financial minds to your teams that are formulating your Action Plan. Turn to Wall Street for advice. Look to financing alternatives that are not now used. In the case of the Santa Ana River dairies, they will be eventually moving. So here's one concept: Can the dairy land be pre-sold for its cash value in anticipation of the ultimate move to the Central Valley? This could provide a portion of the fair share funds that the dairies would bring to the table. California and federal grants would also be part of the funding formula. Local and state governments must also be willing to issue the bonds for flood control improvements that are necessary to prevent the run-on problem that the dairies wrestle with every wet winter. The dairies are required to dike their properties against runoff but they can't fight against run-on that occurs because of inadequate flood control. Local government has already brought resources to bear on the problem. I'll provide you two examples. First, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District has constructed a state-of-the-art 4 composting facility that handles a mix of manure and urban biosolids. The capacity of the facility is sufficient to handle less than 25% of the manure produced in the area—but irs a positive start. Unfortunately, essentially all of the operational funding is provided by Chino Basin Municipal Water District. Because the costs of processing all of the solids are not provided by this arrangement, a major portion of the manure and biosolids are not being transported to a market. Funding help is needed here. The second example of local resources is the construction of wetlands downstream of the dairies and the municipal wastewater treatment plants that discharge to the watershed. Funded primarily by the Orange County Water District, these wetlands provide significant reduction to the nutrients present in the water coming from those upstream sources and provide a remarkable habitat resource in the middle of one of the most densely populated urban settings of California. These are examples of an innovative web of agencies working together to solve problems. "Shared governance" is a way to express the relationship of the agencies that organize themselves around specific objectives and use an adaptive matrix form of management to address the problems contained within the objective. Over the years, AMSA and other urban interests have become very frustrated with the lack of progress in solving non-point source pollution. But that frustration must be put aside. These are societal problems. As long as urban folks enjoy the milk and cheese that the dairy folks produce, then we are lied to the problem, too. Enforceable timelines plus broad funding support 5 and innovative financing alternatives will be necessary to fix the problem. It's simply unrealistic to believe that the dairies and agriculture can, by themselves, provide the necessary cash to clean up the problem. If you will provide the financial and regulatory flexibility to address each unique problem, and specific deadlines and performance standards to keep everybody honest and moving forward at a reasonable rate, then I believe we can see progress in the Santa Ana River watershed. As someone who lives in the watershed and looks to its future, I urge you to provide a wide range of tools that can be used to address the problems that we have. Local agencies and locally developed solutions can work. Invest your trust, time and resources to help make it happen. And require accountability to make sure that it does happen. Thank you. 6 Consensus Statement Executive Management Retreat October 15-16, 1997 Summary Statement The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County is a recognized leader in the wastewater industry. Our ongoing goal is to maintain this leadership and to be "best in class"while operating in full regulatory compliance, at maximum efficiency and productivity, and with fiscal responsibility to the ratepayers of Orange County. We will maintain a performance-based organization that follows a modern management approach to doing business. Decisions will continue to be made at the appropriate level by staff who have the autonomy, training and expertise to do so. Employee involvement assures that our work practices and the results of our endeavors continually justify our efforts and are the best possible use of time and money. Automation, information technology and state-of-the-art wastewater technology will be used as tools to ensure the continuation of our reliable, dependable service and to enhance the flow of information, facilitate communications and provide timely, accurate data from which to make sound, environmentally responsible and business-based decisions. In partnership with other public agencies and private entities, and in accordance with policies adopted by our Board, we will continue to pursue and implement cost-effective water reclamationlconservation programs that help ensure a reliable source of water at a reasonable cost to meet the needs of our community. As professionals in wastewater management, we are committed to insuring that our revenue is sufficient to support our operations and other programs; our fees are equitable and reasonable for the services we provide; and, our capital improvement program is appropriate to meet demands of Orange County's growth, the requirements of the State of California the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. We practice our Guiding Principles, which have been adopted as a declaration of who we are and the beliefs we affirm. These principles form the framework of our organization and reinforce our individual and collective professional code of ethics. CSDOC • P.O.Box 8127 •Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 •(714)SU-2411 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County TRAINING SURVEY The Human Resources Department at the Orange County Sanitation Districts Is conducting a survey to determine if other organizations would be interested In sharing training costs and resources. Please take a few minutes to complete the following: NAME: POSITION: ORGANIZATION: TELEPHONE#: 1. How many employees do you currently have? 2. Do in-house trainers conduct training? Externally? 3. What is the average cost you spend per student? Per class? 4. Would you be interested in having employees attend training at the Orange County Sanitation Districts Training Center if you could train your employees at a lower cost? INSTRUCTIONS: Please place an "X" by training programs you would be Interested in having employees attend from the list below and approximate the number of employees. A description of the courses may be found In the Education and Training Catalogue. SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE Confined Space Entry(8 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ Confined Space Rescue(2 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Confined Space Entry Refresher (4 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ Respiratory Protection (Air Purifying Respiratory) (2 hours) Approx. #of Employees: Respiratory Protection (SCBA and Airline)(2 hours) Approx. #of Employees: Respiratory Protection (SCBA and Airline) Refresher(2 hours) _ Approx.#of Employees: Department of Transportation Substance Abuse Training for Commercial Dnvers(1 hour) Approx.#of Employees:_ Department of Transportation Substance Abuse Training for Supervisors of Commercial Drivers (4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ C.S.D.O.C.Training Survey Page 1 of 6 SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE lcon't) Aenal Lift Training(8 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ Air Monitoring Instrumentation(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Air Monitoring Instrumentation Refresher(2 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Crane Training(8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Defensive Driving (4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Forklift Training(8 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ Forklift Training Refresher(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Hoist, Crane and Davit Safety(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Hoist, Crane and Davit Safety Refresher(2 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ Bloodbome Pathogens(2 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ Fire Safety/Extinguisher Training (4 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ First Aid/CPR(6.5 hours) Approx. #of Employees: _ First Aid/CPR Refresher(4 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ Injury and Illness Prevention Program for Supervisors(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Injury and Illness Prevention Program for Employees(2 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Hazardous Energy Control (Lockout/ragout)(4 hours) Approx. If of Employees: _ Hazardous Energy Control Refresher(2 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ High-Voltage Electrical Safety Training (16 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ Bulk Hazardous Materials Handling (2 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Hazard Communication(1 hour) Approx. #of Employees:_ Hazardous Substance Handling (2 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ Hazardous Materials Transportation (2 hours) Approx. #of Employees:_ C.S.D.O.C. Training Survey Page 2 of 6 SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE lcon't1 Hazardous Waste Operations (HAZWOPER)(40 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ HAZAWOPER Refresher(8 hours) Approx.A of Employees:_ Emergency Coordinator(2 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Emergency Operations Center (4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Hazmat First Responder Operational (FRO)(8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Hazmat Incident Commander(8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Hazmat Technician/Specialist(16 hours)_ Approx.#of Employees: Integrated Emergency Response Program Overview(2 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Incident Command System (ICS) Introduction(2 hours) Approx.#of Employees: CS Emergency Management(8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ SEMS/ICS Executive Overview(1 hour) Approx.#of Employees:_ Herbicide and Pesticide Safety(3 hours)_ Approx.#of Employees:_ Pure Oxygen Safety Training(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Trenching and Shoring "Competent Person"(8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ COMPUTER TRAINING Microsoft Access 97 Fundamentals (8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Microsoft Access 97 Intermediate (8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Microsoft Excel 97 Fundamentals (8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Microsoft Excel 97 Intermediate (8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Microsoft Outlook 97 Fundamentals (8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Microsoft PowerPoint 97 Fundamentals (8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ C.S.D.O.C. Training Survey Page 3 of 6 COMPUTER TRAINING (con'tt Microsoft PowerPoint 97 Intermediate/Advanced(8 hours) Approx.#of Employees: Microsoft Word 97 Fundamentals (8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Microsoft Word 97 Intermediate Approx.#of Employees:_ (8 hours) Microsoft Word 97 Advanced(8 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ Microsoft Windows NIT 4.0 Fundamentals(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ How to use the Internet(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISORY TRAINING Back—to—Basics Supervisor/ Management Training (11 modules;4 hours each) Approx.#of Employees:_ Dealing with Substance Abuse in the Workplace Approx.#of Employees:_ Understanding Your Role as a Member of the Management Team Approx.#of Employees:_ Managerial Skill Assessment/ DISC Management Strategies Approx.#of Employees:_ The Performance Review Process (PRP) Approx.#of Employees:_ What it Takes to be a Good Boss Approx.#of Employees:_ Preparing for Process Reengineering Approx.#of Employees:_ Establishing and Maintaining a Productive Work Environment/DISC Managerial Strategies(Phase 1) Approx.#of Employees:_ Establishing and Maintaining a Productive Work Environment/DISC Managerial Strategies, i.e. Dealing with employees with negative attitudes (Phase 2) Approx.#of Employees:_ Counseling and Coaching Employees (DISC Phase 3) Approx.#of Employees:_ Diversity in the Workplace Approx.#of Employees:_ Understanding Your Role in a C.S.D.O.C. Training Survey Page 4 of 6 MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISORY TRAINING (con't) Safety Program Approx.#of Employees: Prevention of Sexual Harassment for Supervisors/Managers Approx.#of Employees:_ Project Management IS hours) Approx.#of Employees: Recognizing and Preventing Violence in the Workplace(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees:_ GENERAL INTEREST TOPICS Assertiveness Training(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees: Conflict Management IS hours) Approx.#of Employees: Dealing with Change(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees: Dealing with Difficult People (4 hours) Approx.#of Employees: Effective Writing(6 hours) Approx.#of Employees: Stress Management(4 hours) Approx.If of Employees: Planning for Retirement(2 hours) Approx.#of Employees: Time Management(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees: Executive Assistant/Secretarial/ Clerical Certificate Program Approx. #of Employees: How to Manage a Budget(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees: Technical Procedure Writing Approx.#of Employees: Grammar Usage(6 hours) Approx.#of Employees: Train-the Trainer(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees: Prevention of Sexual Harassment for All Employees(4 hours) Approx.#of Employees: TECHNICAL TRAINING Please specify the type of technical or job skill training you currently use outside contractors for, i.e.fiber optics, instrumentation, boilers, pumps, etc. C.S.D.O.C.Training Survey Page 5 of 6 Anything else you would like to add? THANK-YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMPLETE THIS SURVEY( Please return this survey by Monday.December 15, 1997 to: DENISE MARTINEZ C/O COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CA 92708 C.S.D.O.C. Training Survey Page 6 of 6 Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Secx-on Page# Date Subject Los Angeles Times Rain-Related / 'FAGS: Storm Runoff may many `� 7�,, adjacent to make. riven and Sewage Spills atom dram at Irrr[through today Overwhelms Waste System erPo� t the n`y pmb- C1oseBeaches facing baron W We wake of Ladtivaed from Al believed W be related to El Nmn thostrom. Nat. slammed South County commucd- in Laguna Basalt the suarm 9iELBY GRAD -' Another sewage panPWg elatan tie such an lagnm Beech and emacd Several fee[ of the Maio IBY mad overwhelmed down the sorest fake Forest with more tom 7 Beach,but the area is opected he HYMOU tam Ilene Point.sending 100.000 to inch" of ran—several Inches WECIAL TO rns TIM" 900A00 ous of effluent min the Sere Seen Died etrich.la wer time, gall theethm mtlhejumal�w althea held Seen Dietrich. a lifeguard The weekend's fierce © Sea Jum Cmrk, wma Bowe WW the vonh Beaumont. Nlho-related storm sent the ave^ about 500.000 gallons of =Two Smaller spine prompted �T'he Sanitation which s of obsB ease ute ly duty at the tsnm[y heath Impectam to shun + BranBe ComtY. which Serve bleln Brach.butoNYWremind the sewage into the Pacific 'down portlom of Laguna Beach communities north of the El Tom public Best the beach by closed Sty ocand, forcing the county and Dolmy Beach as well. Y. said iW treatment system ea- oNtlmsemd W close 71h miles of mast- -'Thin in a algniMant tlosme," perfenced no failures but was The boardwalk.rebWll after the line between LeguM Beach avid Larry Hoveybourne.manager Pushed W the IImLL 1995 corm, compact MY aMaas and San Clemente,officials of the aunty's water-quaglY Pm- On SatuedaY, the west¢-water damage. But the .herby graswy gam. "When you have 6 to 7 Syrian hit a peak when 500 million park Is nothing but a field of mud said Monday. heard,of rain in a few horns.the galloas—twla the normal Bow— and the concrete walkways were one of the hardest-tilt se ersymerat ateavthmdleil" rushed through its plants. DnrWg tarp tap by the Tough a&. locations was Affect Beach. --High chloroform bacteria anon We Severe floods of January 1995t where runoff overwheimed hmeeding state awhaming Stand- BenPhekwow550,WagaDons t tattle Canada Beach an roc a sewer Pumping =if= Ptds were mearded at the fear "Because of the heavy hmow of ['ledge of Newport Seark the MIOUJI ea of beach cad- The levels of rmnwater, we ask people to end caused 130,000 W Storm emapef away hevd.lhevinge gaUom of untreated hamerm indicate she possible pore- down an the amoun m str t of worse cobblestone share with ap- and used enceofdisense-causing orgavl®s, water they Iprvdmel during the motedvegeaummddebtls waste water to Dow from Noneyboumesmd storms." said Michelle 'rdchnen. "1•va Dever dead It like thu an outcrop just off the People who Swim or surf at We dpoke+woman for the sanimtlan bpj ..Said Brent Radek,marine Plsaw wee BEACHES.AYE barman could be erpaed W A- dleWna 'There water masons- Safety Supervisor for Newport puree such as, hepatitis o Selma. tion mramvermakeadWemna." Beach-It just cocked oil the Sued pellainthewater,headded. County health ofBcub,described _ Slv aWtation agencies have bass the been dome.cha theces she Bee mom The beech probably would be a4o Mandl,wichk she Jmuery 1g95 warning We nti lc far months stoma,which Beast caa l t e South remaretl could time ec normal ptnc- nbom die file ,a eather oI of Newport Bhea antl tha South ems but m receive some hu- pmtd by II filed,i whether pat- County Haneyb-lim a fo d Saturday's t a rem urety re Sea John Bar We tomcanceled nbring heavyugho ttdas wageybourne cold Un awport Beach Fire Ma or b Orange County throughout the sewage because ratios appeared - Newport lima }yen and Marine ,W➢ter. Md t d with sewer became W- Department Doing aownpoos, water oughlown ref t with the u d and trod b sued i may end up'thcking some Won the rower sYning, in e co Waugh relheaamepeWe Boda costa heed m W reel "he Bec bean W 1mti Ytabng waste-watertrefm- such. inspects.wWaea We Umefoelmmer.'he rota Mraa daily herd won't raper anent systems beyond capacity. arm W salaam and Sudan hm Aho sr, w m W tlda r<panx red Honeybourne verb rde ed er mis me min the baeterta leech fell wIW W radio a Sarno, vims asp molar 'red Send overburdened sewer rap mate Bwlnmfny mmdanno oaSdr Rerea am aneapdndmrb lured Lead waste water lntu the street Offlclele slaw aged ewlmmereW Y.tYdoavdpnoYMwia� -Santadatestricts a We rem. -9amWtlm districts have been working rdayp p,ith tltln aPiet.-- epandr plugs a the manhole cover in refuge and are doing asking au laundnts ry mfeav Imo dmvg laundry dm- the heavy rode laundry ja ores of Bee tap producer of household west¢wear. newer systems le South County the l carlemS from Salo- ugs.pr -the lest dWrm of the Beeson Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject Los Angeles Times �z13�9 �P ��� 5eue�ilNce� DWP to Offer Severance Packages ■Utilities: incentives to prepares for deregulation in the said that the rnntracl agreement is next century," Riordan said a far one and that about 500 make dOWnsimg more tbrough hisspokeswoman. employees might take the buyoms. palatable to unions range The severance package ap. The union members now are rot- from cash buyouts to early ww�embia me two u�being cob ost�ries'uf the which000 toson retiremenL negotiated,will offer MEW mom- members by nearly 2%in April. bers a choice five years in any "I thin[this is fair,"D'AWY said By BEIH SHUSTER combination of service credit or "It has a little something for rrNta sravv wane¢ age applied to retirement, or two everyone and it ensures we're not weeks salary for each year of in the middle of a big labor beef LOS ANGW.FS—After meeting se service with a of inmuo, .f$2,000 during ri r restructuring." yng." tmlan and behind closed doors le executive session, the Los Angeles Hoard of in an interview, Freeman said ultimately the City Council, the Water and Power tower mak- the severance packages will ease line also gives 00high-voluge retention took a map Tuesday inward rick- the pain ye potential job loose for We workers a with t retention bag the public ilit of Amens'- all employees. bonus for staying with the DWP— Largest Palatable, u1Wro more posts- eThe employee unions now have mother than Wring Jabs with future an=Palatable.approving a never- the eas to nity m allow their era- Pacific Gas such c. Edison m anm package armed at enticing money,two leave Cwithant gredty-md Paper DWElectric. rider be mkers m retire rather than money,twr important ingredients," Other DWP union they are con- The eing Bead Freeman said 'Tops E designed m fives say, however. they are con. The commissioners approved a retirement the people who are near They about their negotiation. tWO-mce package ex part of a retirement m leave n they won't They have set a Feb.1 contract by two-year MajorityofDcontract extensionservice forand bump through the reeks and bump which agreements an reached. the orkers, DWP's service and out gtheisomeone careenyounger and just start- mdrta ottc confident. but Imched bylin the workers,who al.represented in"It has ereer. "I'm not co Jerry Pf but pe- the by the Intrival Workers. . TheBmth c m- 7t has a humanitarian and util.man tin;' said Jerry PWP's man. the m sms Electrical Wmkem. The coral Ry—tallish—purpose;' Freemen mentdent to the Assn.. Manage- mamuger also gave DWP General added meet Employees Ann.,which rep- M thorn t 1 approve sever the Brien DMZW the business man. enema 35f managers,224 of whom authority to approve severance ago for MERr, fast Union In, are slated for layoffs. packages with two other employee union—including those expected to be bardost hit by layoffs—the DWP's arcldtecta and engineers and managers. The DWP, which has a whop- ping $7.5-billion debt, is attempt- ing to pay down$4 billion by 2003 to Prepare the utility for the com- PetitivemukeL To that and Freeman has said he will need to lay o8 2,000 DWP employers. potentially the largest Jobmtsincilyhiamry. Tuesday's action were aimed at easing the hardship on MEW workers, whose union is affiliated with other powerful labor union. The two other unions are pre- dammately composed of while- collar employees who are targeted for layoffs. Mayor Richard Riordan said he believes that the package is a good one and "sets the stage for other employee negotiations.The idea is to reduce payroll and keep key people on board as the department Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page # Date J Subje�cntt� Orange County Register Z 14 )�q ( l �' 4✓l orm O� 4WO Officials defend closing of drains during rainstorm By IOHN W ESTCOTT The Orange County Register NEWPORT BEACH — Resi- dents of 44th Street cleaned out their waterlogged homes Mon- day,grousing about the city's de- cision to close off the storm drains just as the rain began to pound Sunday morning. At least four homes flooded, but city officials said it would have been worse had the storm drains stayed open. If they had, sea water would have back- flowed through the drains and caused even worse flooding. The torrent Sunday came at high tide, which rose 7.5 feet — 1,2 feet higher than the tide table forecast. John Blauer, Fire De- partment information officer, blames that on El Nino,which is creating a weather system in Asia that lowers ocean waters there and raises tides here. None of that was solace to Ka- ren Stewart, 29, who saw water surge more than a foot high in her 44th Street home, ruining a carpet, stereo and photographs. "I don't believe it," she said. "I think El Nino is just an ex- cuse." Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Pa e # Date Subj Los Angeles TimesIff VKnJ '� r i r3w� A _ _ _ _— _� _ mmuansanarnr euaarwa Dominic Todd of Newport Beach navigates West Balboa Boulevard after high tide and heavy min mused street flooding. Weathering a 1 -2 Punch By PETER M.WARREN wee"city""c e s said awes Harr wane, Heavy Rain and Karen Stewan watched late Sunday mom- kig as her landlord helped pump out the NEWPORT BEACH—Commuters ii� t kitchen of her home at fah Street and could face tight shower this marn- 111t Tlde COmi)ine Balboa Boulevard. Mg.but clear skies are forecast for c I woke up and stepped Into water up to tbb afternoon t0 Flood Streets and here.'she Bald-pointing W a mark about a That wW be a sharp contrast to the rain foot up her calf, -Everything that was out squalls that drenared Orange County on there tin the etrnAl came dawn into my Sunday and caused Bonding in Newport a Few Homes in house because f am the lowest house not the B,,' at,set" A few residents were bailmg out then 1.� Beach Though streets were awash m water, as homes and garages after an unusually high Newport D C` deep as 18 inches,sty officials and flood ng tide mentioned with intense rainfall along the into homes was cart. A few residents were most. forecasters said One re ndent reported seeing a small busy about 11 a.m. sweeping out guagn on the Balboa fumel cloud over the ocean at the heavy, isolated torn bit peawuuiz Police diverutl traffic from the rang directing about 7 am vehicle away at the intersection of Balboa Boulevard and 32nd Newport Beach officials said gauge showed at lean 2 inches Street of nin fell durM the morning storm, sending city mews to Residents who weren't dealing with the rising waters turned pump out Hooded roads.The Hooding was intensified because the event into a beef festival. tiding bieycln through the the rain wooded with the high Bde.forcing sty workers b paddle or paddling dinghte and canoes through the swee¢ shut sbrm drains about dawn to keep bay water from ruing Others teed skimming bodyboards across the small ponds into aty arrests. that covered Iake and River avenues.Many put came out of Instead.the rainwater backed up in the drains and rose into thew homes to gos n,or place a soggy new in the trash. streets. Tide peaked Sunday morning and will drop off Brit - Plwe see STOAkI,8a STORM: Rain Leads to Isolated Flooding Continued from Bt Jeff Hill of Newport Island ped- aled his Schwinn while pulling a friend on a sailboard along Balboa t� Boulevard. i "We had to do something with s all that water," he said "Might as well put a boat on it-" The California Highway Patrol reported minor weather-related i accidents countywide but no famh- _ Use or road closuresMost of the flooding was isolated y to Balboa Peninsula in Newport i„6yp" Beach There were no problems in C, 1 Seal Beach or Sumet Beach.which are subject to flooding during high tides. Newport Island homeowner Stan Swiatek said the island was cut off for about srs hours.until 11 am,by a big pond that formed at the base of the single bridge entrance at 38th Street and River Avenue. The high Ude occurred at 828 Tyler Phillips gives his two cats a am,and workers scurried around lift out of flooded apartment. the peninsula opening storm drai m beginning about 9 a.m. to allow runoff. brunt of the storm It went north Swiatek was one of scores of and missed us." said Seal Beach residents who stood around at the SgL Rick Ramdell. who reported water's edge or waited on door- no flooding in his city. steps for the 62-foot tide to recede John Sherwin, a weather fare- enough to allow the rainfall to caster with WeatherData Inc.. drain into the bay. which provides forecasting for The Residents were seen sandbag- Times, said radar estimates of the grog at the front entranceway to rainfall showed an inch an how their home on 36th Street and had fallen in the immediate coastal Marcus Avenue, than flagging the area of Newport Beach, with occasional car to get the drivers to emounm ranging up to hall an inch cut the wakes that would lap at the inland front lL Neighbors cheered WeatherDats's daily rainfall w- Neighbors cheered at rked am col for Newport Beach wu.30 inch. u a city worker uncorked the Sherwin acknowledged, though, drain"O at yakhe" on f36 m Street that the firm's rain gauge might "Oh yea•" one woman yelled. "O pen it Open it-That make us all not have been in the area of the happy•• city where the precipitation was In the Cannery Village arts heaviest. three doormats that had washed Other rainfall totals across into the emrm drauLs kept the area Orange County were Santa Ana, flooded after the title had dropped M inch.lake Fore34.30 inch;and City workers had W use a truck- San Juan Capistmno,.44 inch. mounted vacuum running in re- The calm were due to a mid verve to blow the mats out of a, front that passed through,Sherwin clogged drain at VWa Way and 319 said- Street- 'There could be some showers in One of the mats was returned to the morning with sunshine by a coffee shop, when a few hearty afternoon,"he said.'"Mere will be mistomers didn't let the fort-high a decreasing trend in clouds waters deter them from their throughout the day. ending with breakfast By 11 am.the raw had Bunny skies by evening." eased and the storm drains were Todzya temperatures were fore- gurgling.In another how•the flood cast u slightly curler than see- wuamerememorytomost tonal, with highs expected in the It Inks like Newport got the mid-60s. Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings (164n Name of Paper Section Page # Date Subject / e I enforcement efforts.. In October Study Fords Lax 1998, the elate toughened sand- SEWAGE. arch boards use to determine how Enforcement at much they would fine violators, said Fran VItuW, a spokeswoman for the stale Water Resources Findings Are Sewage Plants Control Board. She giro said her Challenged agency recently was given Iegisla- 'We take an appropriate tive approval to hire 18 enforce- g ment officers who will be scattered ■ Pollution:Groupdetails action every time that throughout the slate. Kurt Berchlold,assistant execu- clanged b from Be nearly ISO violations of there Is violation when live officer of the California Re. charged by industrialSoutheast Regional we think there Is Intent or tonal Water Alien and Southeast Regional the Clean Water Act over a g Quality Control were cited for violations in every four-year period. negligence on the part of BOOO -Saran t Ana legion, said the q'�ar of the tour-year randy the discharge.' county every time there is vials- period' according to the report By LIZ SEYMOUR K11"aERCHTOLD lion Officials at the plants could not be reached for comment The County SPECIAL TO axa TIMES Local water olAcial every take at appropriate action Sanitation Districts were cited every time that there la a intent once for ills g Lax ante enforcement has re- — when we think there la )latent a gal malfunction at e the C n nearly 150 violations of negligence an the because of a , saidMi at e the Clean Water Act b Orange � Part of the Ydi The stud found 4,02said. pumping station, said Michelle Con is i four sewage treatment The Clan found 4,492 violations Tuchman, the agency's director of plants In the last four years, - of the Clean Water Act among the coOrange Coun. public-interest group said Thum- slate's 230largeet dischargers from Orange Crd-hags sti violations day. July 1992 to June 1996, according were the third-highest in the ante. The t Group aimPublic Research dthat n CALPIRG's review of ante re- About half the violations were Interest Group nim found that cords. Violations Included illegal found to San Diego County, and regional water boards, which we discharge,not treating toxic waste Los Angela County was cited 171 responsible for enforcement,rarely before sending it to sewage plants times. fine polluters and that the rinse are and not complying with deadlines. The CALPIRG study aim found m minuscule they don't act as Mast of the largest polluters were that a third of the slate's largest deterrents. Most o thetIngement plane,Including dischargers were cited for viola- The results fail"tar short"of the the Sanitation Districts of Orange Uons at least once,and one of every goals of the Clean Water Act,said County plants In Fountain Valley 12 was cited every quarter. Nels BjorkgWet,campaign director , end Huntington Beach, Aliso We- The public-interest research of the Orange County CALPIRG. group le calling for mandatory ter Management In San Juan Cap- and the Ludy the law-In 19[to istrano and the Southeast Re oral minimum penalties far violators. end the study was conducted to Reclamation Agency in Dana The report also cads,for tightening coincide with its upcoming 25th POIRL loopholes In federal and state law anniversary. Treatment plants process toxic that allow companies to avoid lim- Stste officials challenged the re- chemicals and other waste disc its on the number of toxic chemi- port's findings because they say It We and the amounts they can doesn't accurately reflect current Pleasesee SEWAGFw W discharge into sew age wage treatment plane. LAW WATCH 97-23 A Legal Newsletter from Foley lardner Weisshurg & Aronson NOVEMBER 17, 1997 Several changes to the Brown RECENT quorum of the board, that Act's requirements emerged is from the Legislature in 9)97,which DEVELOPMENT$ board meeting.ttee Underd�new affect public agencies' functioning REGARDING THE law, however, if this 'noncom- under the Act in 1998. What BROWN ACT mittee° board member attends the follows is a summary of those committee meeting solely as an changes. observer, then that committee meeting will not be deemed a Meetings Via Executive Summary board meeting. Although the law Conference Calls Acto= Recmr kgis!acion xmses the does not define an 'observer; it Brown Aa, Cvlir—s open a appears that an observing noncom- Although the Brown Act al- roaring Lnx for IOCGI agmcia mittee board member may not be ready permitted meetings co be I neb ennw - able to ask questions or participate held by video teleconference, this en s via mnfenence rolls,al7ons in the discussion, even to the same option has been little used For mncovt ee:board manlm to eaten[ as a member of the public 1998,meetings may also be held by yrmd commttm iar=gs ear ordinary telephone conference can. obsar m dimes the ra7arremmt Regular Meeting Schedules No special board action is needed f�standing=d admto y to au[borixe such meetings. Con- �vns to e aht idi ngu(ar The new law eliminates the ference all and video conference s;.vt zing Kbed ua, and makes orix+ requirement for standing commit- meetings are generally subject to dwngra tees and advisory committees to the same rules as facto-fate meet- Eff Dye Janumy 1, 1993. establish regular meeting schedules. rags, with some exceptions. All agency business an be conducted -- " Attendance at by teleconferenm However,there Board Meetings of are some special rules applicable to Other Agencies such meetings: (1) rolltaB votes recommend that agencies endeavor must be taken on all actions; to treat each confaence call meeting The Act will no longer apply (2) every confaeace call meeting location as if it were the primary to the attendance of a majority of location must be open and acm6w location of the meeting. Providing the members of a local board at a ble to the public, (3) each meeting access to fax transmissions to and meeting of another local agency's location must be included in the from each meeting location, or board even if they participate in notice and agenda for the meeting; reading to all meeting participants that other agency's meeting. For (4) the agenda must provide an materials which are distributed a eaample, when a majority of a opportunity for members of the one meeting location may facilitate eny's council members attend an public to address the board at each this open and noticed meeting of a meeting location; (5) the meetings school district board, the city will must also comply with 'all Board Member Attendance net be required to .notice the requirements' of the Brown Act, at Committee Meetings school district's meeting as a city including jurisdictional require- council meeting. However, at menu; and (6) the agency must Until January 1, 1998,if a board inch a meeting, the city council protect the statutory and consti- memba, who is not a member of a members may not meet together to tutilz rights of the parties and committee, anent that discuss items of city business. the public when holding [elecoa- certaincommittee's meeting and makes a They�Y>however,Participate in ference meetings. In general, we the school board's meeting. 01997 Foky lardner Wdv6urg&Aromoa Reprodueioa math a-Iudoo permin<d. Other Changes Law Woo i n a; of mtrnt Currently, the Act requires a ,kgol dead P-P6 od LY local agency to send notices of the law a of Foley]Lindner. meetings at least one week before Weinbwg&Arorsswt the to members of the7hem.n_g not be construe r reported dviu public who inquest such notices. ;'.not be construed as Legal advice, The new law will require the '. nor wilue{.to molve legal agency to send instead "a copy of problems Our Odor is otrm all the documents constituting the a,looted is,. agenda packet" at the time that the I. ANGIIFs, CA agenda is posted or upon distribu- 2029 Century Park East tion to a majority of all the went 'Suite 350D bers of the board,whichever occurs Los Angeles, CA 9DO67 first. Tel - (330)277-2223 Fax (310) 557-8475 Also,under the new law a local SACRAbman, CA board will more easily be able to 300 CpiTol Mall add to the agenda items Suite 1 ai1516g rnm125 Sa CA 95814 after the agenda was posted ( Tel- 916 443-8005 Adding such items will require Fax-�916� 443-2240 only a 2/3 vote of those board R.txtN scv,CA members present instead of a 2/3 SAN One Maritime Plan vote of the entire board If lea one Floor than 2/3 of the board is present, San Franciscq CA 94111 then a unanimnm vote is needed to Tel- (415)434-4484 add items to the agenda Fan- 415 4344507 :.Seta Dr ,CA Our firm bas prepared a booklet 402 Wet Broadway which contains an updated, 23tdFloor complete copy of the Act and San Diego CA 92101 Tel- 619 234-6655 other statutes related to open T Teel- 619 2343510 meetings of local agencies. If you would like a copy, please contact Addideval oJl+�7or te!6+ Elizabeth Davis m our San Diego ' aq 71; a�ouv+lk in Madaon, WI,.MR.....•6 W FLI office a (619) 234-6655. Addi- ;Orlando,FL; Ta]ldbaure,FL; tionally, if you have any questions Tampa,FL; m D.C;>nd about the Brown Act or the recent �e`t POI"' b,F. changes,please comaR Julie Ashby To afviw W of an address mnec- or Greg Moser in our San Diego non,plate cAU(800)400-7757. office, James Salyvas in our Los Angeles office, or Tom Driscoll in our San Francisco office, or the member of the firm who normally handles your legal matters. °1997 Foley Ivdaer Weissburg k Arowon. Reproduction with amihutioa perm n Orange County Sanitation Districts Newspaper Clippings Name of Paper Section Page# Date Subject A It If116/19 SLUDGE: Supervisors cite public perception as vote factor Staruslaus CONTINUED from A-1 "It's not worth the risk," sold a ranch near Oakdale. The Inc. couldn't agree on whether to land.The ordinance wouldU' ep- Supervisor Paul Caruso, sum- dent prompted the local agricol- rernmmend the ordinance or a bans sludge ply to lend owned by the tlit of ming up supervisors'concerns. oral community to begin look- ban. Turlock and Modesto. The board's decision ends Ing at how treated sewage was Tuesday, the board's task was for crops For Modesto, the proposed mare than four yeah of protract- being used In Stenlsleus County. to decide how it wanted to pro- ban means it can continue to ap- ad and impassioned debate The county appointed atom- teed. Five options were present- By LIbbY lens ply sludge to crops mired on Its about whether the county should mine¢made up of farmers,sew- ed,ranging from considering the Bee amn moor ranch on Jennings Road near allow the use of sludge. age treatment officials and oth. advisory board's ordinance to a Sludge may be burned or Patterson. The debate pitted the 3,400- ers to prepare an ordinance ban to still other possibilities. buried, but it won't be ap- Formally banning the use of member Slanislaus County Farm outlining how and when sludge Modesto wanted the board to plied to crops In Stanislaw sludge probably won't happen Bureau agaims the city of Mo- could be used. consider the fifth option—some (--pppty., untif the end of December, but desto, which produces about It look nearly four years for other possibility. That's the gist of the 11's on ihel any of the beard 25,000[ore o/sludge a year end the group to come up with In a lager presented Tuesdayy, unanimous decision members will change their needs a way to dispose of It. guidelines, and even then there the city asked the board to do reached Tuesday by the minds. Modesto Is the major propo- was Iig1e consereus,with the ag- two things. It wanted the county county Board of Supervi- "My fear Is that counties on nent because it's the largest pro- rientIn I community auspicious to delay action four weeks x wrs.which was(earful that both sides of us have banned It cesxr of sewage generated by of the material end Modesto Ihet the sty could meN with eth- ming treated sewage waste — for legitimate reasons,' mid homes, food-processing plants pushing for fix approval er"slakehoMam'-local menu- - sludge — as fertilizer Supervisor Ray Simon,who add. and septic tanks. The proposed ordinance first facturem, farm bureau, county would be a public relations ed that he could Just hear farm. Although there ere other ways came before supervisors In April. staff — to "outline a new ap- nightmare for the coun s ers in Merced and San Joaquin to dispose of treated sewage, Though It outlined how to test, preach," and to Impose a five- $1.2 billion agricalmre TI counties saying. "Come buy our such m burning It or burying it track and monitor the use of year moratorium while field tests dustry. product.we have no blosolids on in a landfill, the city determined sludge,the board sent it back to were conducted. The board directed coun- our land." that mixing It with yard waste the Planning Commission for The city's request not only was ty staff to prepare an ordi- Supervisor Nick Blom said, and offering it m a fertilizer was further work. rejected, but it also provoked a nance banning the use of "Science may say it's OK but the best solution economically The commission held tam five- variety of comments by supervi- sludge on unincorporated perception Is different." He Is and environmentally, mid Rich- hour workshops over the sum- son and others about how the concerned that the public won't and Ramirez, the clty's acting met and a public hearing In Oc. city had been uncooperative See Back Page,Sludge buy fruits and vegetables grown public works director. tober to review Information throughout the four years and on soil fertilized with treated The debate began in 1993, about the use of sludge. But the That Its request wm too little too sewage. when sludge was misapplied on nine-member commission late. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1997 aiCTS 0f0AAm yew � o0 G Z � � a wvv E EN Poa�� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 11/19/97 Page 2 of 8 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on November 19, 1997, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT X Pat McGuigan, Chair Thomas E. Lutz NO. 1 X James M. Fe an Chair pro tern I Arthur Perry A Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz X Thomas R. Saharelli I I Jim Potts Todd Spitzer X I William G.Steiner DISTRICT X Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Michael L. Maedzweller NO.2 A Mark A. Murphy,Chair pro tem Joanne Coontz X Steve Anderson John Holmberg X Bruce Broadwater Mark Le es X John Collins James Petdkin X Barry Denes Bob Bell X Bumie Dunlap Marty Simonoff X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Chris Norby Don Bankhead Todd S azer X William G. Steiner X Hank Wachs Mark Schwin A I Bob Zemel Tom Dal DISTRICT A Ma le L. Rice Chair James V.Evans NO. 3 X Eva Miner-Bradford Chair pro tem Paul F.Walker X Steve Anderson John Holmberg X George Brown Gwen Forsythe X Tom Carroll Ma Ann Jones X John Collins James Petrikin Brian Donahue X Harry M.Dotson X Bumie Dunlap Marty Simonoff X Mark Le es Bruce A.Broadwater X Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Chris Norby Don Bankhead Todd Spitzer X William G. Steiner X Dave Sullivan Tom Hannan X Charles E.Sylvia Alice B.Jampsa A Bob Zemel Tom Dal DISTRICT X Jan De bey, Chair 1 John E. Noyes NO.5 X I John E. Noyes,Chair pro tern I Jan Deba X I William G. Steiner I Todd Spitzer DISTRICT I X I James M.Fe man Chair Arthur Pe NO.S X William G. Steiner Chair pro tern Todd S itzer X I Jan Debay I I Tom W.Thomson Minutes for Joint Board Meeting s' 11/19/97 as Page 3 of 8 ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT X Thomas R. Saharelll Chair Jim Potts NO. 7 X Christina Shea.Chair protem Barry Hammond X Jan Debay Tom W.Thomson X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz A Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X William G.Steiner Todd Spitzer DISTRICT I X ShirleyDettloff, Chair 1 1 Tom Harman NO. 11 1 X Dave Sullivan, Chair pro tern I I Tom Harman Todd Spitzer I X I William G. Steiner DISTRICT X Burnie Dunlap,Chair Marty Simonotf NO. 13 X Mark Schwin Chair pro tern Hank Wedaa A Merk A. Mu h Joanne Coontz X I William G.Steiner I Todd Spitzer A I Bob Zemel Tom Dal DISTRICT 1 X Christina Shea Chair BarryHammond NO. 14 X Thomas R. Sattarelli Chair ro lem Jim Potts A Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz X I William G.Steiner I I Todd Spitzer X I Peer A. Swan Darryl Miller STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT- Don McIntyre, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Chris Dahl; Ed Hodges; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy Wheatley; Andrei loan; Terri Josway; John Linder, Greg Mathews; Doug Stewart; Ryal Wheeler; Mike White; Chuck Winsor, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Terry Andrus, Assistant General Counsel; Mary Lee REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair requested Directors to check the notice of meetings in the agenda package for upcoming meetings and informed them of some date changes REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Terry Andrus gave Directors a brief update on the status of the appeals of the employees terminated as the result of an investigation. He also referred to a memo placed in the Directors' meeting folders regarding SAWPA and reported this item would be going to the FAHR Committee on December 10, 1997. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts) There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held November 19, 1997, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 11/19/97 Page 4 of 8 RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS (All Districts) MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A", "B", and "C', attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below. ALL DISTRICTS 09/17/97 10/01/97 Joint Operating Fund $1,236,520.14 $1,436,480.45 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 366,548.98 3,123,543.12 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 2,446.08 0.00 District No. 1 0.00 0.00 District No. 2 0.00 0.00 District No. 3 637.88 1,466.00 District No. 5 0.00 979.91 District No. 6 0.00 0.00 District No. 7 32,625.00 70,522.34 District No. 11 122.00 0.00 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 12 693.08 TOTALS $1 638 900 OB $9.645_MA-91) Director Mark Leyes abstained. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and authorize award of a contract for Job No. 132-39-1,TWAS Feed to Digesters F and G at Plant No. 2,to Olsson Construction providing for modifications to allow the Thickened Waste Activated Sludge (f WAS)to be fed to Digesters F and G, in a total amount of$98,950. DISTRICT 5 10. MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve plans and specifications for Beautification of Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33-1, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; authorize the General Manager to set December 11, 1997 at 11:00 a.m. for bid opening; and authorize the Board Secretary to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. 11. MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve plans and specifications for Relocation of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-41-1, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; authorize the General Manager to set January 6, 1998 at 11:00 a.m. for bid opening; authorize the Board Secretary to publish the Notice Inviting Bids; and authorize a total project budget of$1,395,400. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 11/19/97 Page 5 of 8 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 13.b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of Steering Committee, re the November 19, 1997 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 22, 1997 to be filed. 14.b. DRAFT AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN MINUTES (All Districts): The Chair ordered the draft Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the meeting held on October 23, 1997 to be filed. 15.1b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the November 5, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 5, 1997 to be filed. 15.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and authorize the issuance of a purchase contract for Electrical Generator Maintenance for Nine Generators, Specification No. 9798-7, to Power Generation, Consulting, Inc. in the total amount not to exceed $51,172,00. 16.b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director John Collins, Chair pro tem of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the November 6, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 6, 1997 to be filed. 16.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-35-3; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage &Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5; Process Area Fire Protection, Signage &Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46; and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modficabons at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55 with Sverdrup Civil, Inc. authorizing an addition of$80,611.00 and 27 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $13,568,432.00. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 11/19/97 Page 6 of 8 16.d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 &5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-43; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P144; Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48; Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-50; Seismic Retrofit at Plant No.2, Job No. P2-53.2; Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2, SP19950021; and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15, SP19950059, with Margate Construction, Inc. authorizing an addition of$93,811.00, increasing the total contract amount to $8,666,558.00. 16.e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the Purchasing Manager to award a contract for Office Furniture Systems and Freestanding Fumiture for Plant No. 2 Maintenance Building, Specification No. E-273, for an amount not to exceed $63,397 plus shipping and tax, to Centrepoint Commercial Interiors. DISTRICTS 2. 3. 5, 6. 7& 11 17.b. DRAFT SELECTION COMMITTEE MINUTES: A verbal report was presented by Director Jan Debay, Chair of the Selection Committee re the October 29, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Selection Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 29, 1997 to be filed. 17.c. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Selection Committee letter and approve Professional Services Agreement with MacDonald-Stephens, Engineers, Inc. to prepare a project report providing for recommendations and cost estimates for rehabilitation and improvement of 17 pump stations and two metering facilities in connection with Miscellaneous Improvements and Rehabilitation of Outlying Pump Stations, Contract No. 2-37, for an amount not to exceed $508,546. ALL DISTRICTS 18.b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All DisMcts): A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the November 12, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 12, 1997 to be filed. 18.c. MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1997. 18.d. MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1 through September 30, 1997. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 11/19/97 Page 7 of 8 18.e. MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file 1997-98 Financial and Operational Report for the first quarter ending September 30, 1997. 18.f. MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive,file and approve the Districts' Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR)for the year ended June 30, 1997, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants. 18.g. DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3. 5, 6, 7. 11 & 13 First reading and introduction for adoption of proposed ordinances amending ordinances relating to exemptions, rebates and refunds of sanitary sewer service charges, as follows: DISTRICT 1 Ordinance No. 134, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 133 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Read Ordinance No. 134 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 134 and pass to second reading and hearing on December 17, 1997. DISTRICT 2 Ordinance No. 224, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 223 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Read Ordinance No. 224 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 224 and pass to second reading and hearing on December 17, 1997. DISTRICT 3 Ordinance No. 327, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 326 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: MOVED. SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Read Ordinance No. 327 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 327 and pass to second reading and hearing on December 17, 1997. DISTRICT 5 Ordinance No. 535, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Read Ordinance No. 535 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 535 and pass to second reading and hearing on December 17, 1997. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 11/19/97 Page 8 of 8 DISTRICT 6 Ordinance No. 630, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 629 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Read Ordinance No. 630 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 630 and pass to second reading and hearing on December 17, 1997. DISTRICT 7 Ordinance No. 737, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California,Amending Ordinance No. 736 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Read Ordinance No. 737 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 737 and pass to second reading and hearing on December 17, 1997. DISTRICT 11 Ordinance No. 1126,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1125 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Read Ordinance No. 1126 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 1126 and pass to second reading and hearing on December 17, 1997. DISTRICT 13 Ordinance No. 1319,An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1303 Relating to Exemptions, Rebates and Refunds of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: MOVED SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: 1) Read Ordinance No. 1319 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Introduce Ordinance No. 1319 and pass to second reading and hearing on December 17, 1997. ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:06 p.m. Secretary of � � of Directors of County San on IQiI 'cts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 Neadl ata2My.dtaWminl SW I N97tl 11997.dw County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 09/17/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 6487 Slo Gro Division $30.189.80 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 6488 California Comfort Vans $120.404.16 Vans MO 5-28-97 6489 Dell Marketing L.P. $44.796.02 Computers 6490 Edison Co. $57.794.78 Power 6491 FMC Corpore8on-Chemical Products $35.061.16 Hydrogen Peroxide MO 9-14-94 6492 Kemimn Pacific,Inc. $92,300.26 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 6493 Pectficare of California $46,380.18 Medical Insurance Premium 6494 Paine Webber Incorporated $60,848.44 COP Remarketing Agreement 6495 Pascal&Ludwig.Inc. $193.311.00 Construction J-33.2 6496 Pima Gro Systems Inc $178.246.87 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 6497 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $32,625.00 Construction 7.7-1 6498 Tub Ranch/Magan Farms 590,952.83 Residuals Removal 6499 American Telephone&Telegraph-Magacem Service $2,930.48 Long Distance Telephone Service 6500 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R $10.01 Long Distance Telephone Service 6501 A.M.Best Company,Inc. $171.90 Publications 6502 A-Plus Systems 53,355.36 Notice&Ads 6503 AccuStandard $62.89 Lab Supplies 6504 Awpion Technical Company 5803.01 Instrument Supplies 6505 Air Products and Chemicals,In $22,500.00 O&M Agreement Only Gen.Sysl.MO 8-9-89 6505 American Airlines 5793.36 Travel Services 6507 American Industrial Supply Inc $628.04 Building Materials i..� 6508 American Management Association $318.00 Publications W 6509 Angel Scientific Products,Inc $1,039.40 Lab Supplies H 6510 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $305.00 Service Agreement y 6511 Appleone Employment Service $2,099.67 Temporary Employment 5512 Applied Industrial Technologyp rY Services 235.00 Pump Parts 8573 Aquatic Bioassay AM Consulting E235.00 Lab Services 6514 Asbury Environmental Services $35.00 Waste Oil Removal 6515 AMA/Keye Product"Center $235.00 Seminar Registration 6516 API/Roma $135.00 Storage Tank Alarm Repair 6517 AWSI 5299.00 D.O.T.Training Program 6518 Bailey Fischer&Porter Company 31,207.60 Office Supplies 6519 Bank of America $134.32 Banking Fees 6520 Bar Tent Telecom,Inc. $800.00 Telephone Installation 6521 Bamslead Thermokyne $953.06 Lab Supplies 6522 Black&Veatch $24,671.89 Engineering Services 6523 Bob Delivery $107.00 Freight 6524 Brown And Caldwell $7.431.80 Engineering Services P2-35.3,P2-35-5 6525 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $3,085.00 Janitorial Services MO 1.12-94 6526 Bureau of National Affairs $798.28 Subscription 6527 Bush&Associates lnc. $2,404.00 Surveying Services 6528 Business&Legal Reports,Inc. $320.08 Training Materials 6529 Calffomla Auto Collision $1,723.44 Truck Body Repair 6530 California Automatic Gate $921.59 Service Agreement 6531 California Environmental Controls $109.91 Pump Parts 6532 California Journal $37.95 Publication County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 09/17/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 6533 CalBomla Relocation Services $464.00 File Moving Services 6534 California Suppression Systems $589.DD Service Agreement 6535 Calbol.Inc. $1.268.61 Hardware 6535 Camel Corp. $4.562.60 Service Agreement 6537 Center Corporation $180.67 Fiber Optic Cable 6538 Capitol Enquiry,Inc. $123.81 Publications 6539 Camllo Engineers $9,705.05 Engineering Services P1-38,P243-3 6540 Catapult Inc. $5.500.00 On-Site Training 6641 Centrepollde Commercial Intedom $400.68 Office Furniture 6542 Century Safety $594.78 Safely Supplies 6543 Chapman Counseling $14.410.00 Management Training 6544 The City Associates,Inc. $8.687.50 Hearing Ol6cer Services 6545 Coast Fire Equipment $3.556.36 Service Agreement 6546 Cole-Parrrer Instrument Company $39.99 Lab Supplies 6547 John J.Collins $48.65 Expense Relmb. 6548 Compressor Components Of California $5,236.65 Pump Paris 6549 Compucem 1i506.44 Software 65W Connell GM Parts $19.56 Tmtic Parts 6551 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $1.315.33 Electric Parts 6552 Consolidated Plastics Company $436.65 Tools 6653 Continental-McLaughlin $1,182.50 Tools 6554 Converse Consultants $9.720.60 Consulting Services MO&11-93 6555 Cooper Camemn Corporation $1,800.00 Engine Parts y 6556 Core Laboratories,Inc $3,000.00 Solis Testing 6557 Corporate Express $2.329.38 Office Supplies 1 8568 County Wholesale Electric Co, $326.60 Electric Pads 1✓ 6559 CCI Technologies $510.00 Remove Data Cables 6560 CMS,Inc $3,986.50 Professional Services 6561 CS Company $7,413.99 Plumbing Supplies 6562 Califomm Utilities Emergency Association $1,000.00 Membership 6563 CWEA $140.00 Training Registration 6564 CVJEA $800.00 Publications 6565 Daily Pilot $231.25 Notices&Ads 6566 Dapper Tire Co. $140.89 Time 6567 David E.Libert,Ph.D. $312.50 Consultant 6568 Dal Mar Analytical $1,254.00 Bleolids Analysis 6569 Diamond H Recognition $1,482.85 Seneca Awards 6570 Dover Elevator Company $1.055.00 Elevator Maintenance 6571 Downey Ford $295.31 Truck Pads 6572 Dunn-Edwards Corporation $689.00 Paint Supplies 6573 Duthie Generator Service,Inc. $13,724.91 Generator Pads 6574 DME,Inc. $556.51 Compressor Parts 6575 Edlrger Medical Group,Inc. $15D.OD Medical Screening 6576 Electra Bond,Inc. $836.06 Equipment Repair 6577 Enchanter,Inc. $2,100.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-25-95 6578 Environmental Resources Association $2.297.50 Lab Services County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County -' Claims Paid 09117197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 6579 Fairbanks Scales,Inc. $402.16 Service Agreement 6550 Fibedron $1.407.57 Fiber Optic Cable 6581 Finnigan Corp $2.875.00 Service Agreement 6682 Fisher Scientific $2,1D6.21 Lob Supplies 6583 Flo-Systems,Inc. $142.87 Pump Paris 6584 Florida Conveyor&Equipment $798.49 Roller Brackets 6585 Fountain Valley Camera $133.45 Photo Supplies 6586 Fountain Valley Palms,Inc. $182.80 Paint Supplies 6587 France Compressor Products $1,454.16 Compressor Parts 6588 Franklin Ouest Co. $690.95 Office Supplies 6589 Frys Electronics $1,809.41 Electronic&Computer Supplies 6590 Gartner Group Inc. $1,114.68 Professional Services 6591 GartnerGroup $395.00 Subscription 6592 The Gas Company $20,767.57 Natural Gas 6593 Gates Fiberglass Installers $4,996.88 Bleach Tank Repair 65N General Electric Supply Company $6.508.97 Electric Parts 6595 GTE California $6.034.99 Telephone Services 6596 Glerlich-Michell,Inc. $11.822.72 Pump Parts 6597 Gould Instrument System $1,153.83 Paper 6598 Government Institutes Inc. $206.00 Publication `5S1' 6599 Graybar EWdc Company $2,130.09 Electric Parts 6600 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $274.89 Janitorial Supplies m 6601 GST,Inc.I Micro City $12.971.99 Computer Supplies H 6602 Hanker Equipment Company $251.00 Truck Parts Y 6603 Harbour Engineering Group $10.660.91 Mechanical Parts w 6604 Harrington Industrial Plastics $1,350.91 Plumbing Supplies 6605 Harvard Business Review $85.00 Membership 6606 Hatch&Kid,Inc. $1,053.31 Truck Parts 6607 Latin Media Service $20D.00 Notices&Ads 6608 Hoeroiger Service Inc $1,374.46 Compressor Parts 6609 Hunsaker 8 Asscalrvine Inc $908.50 Professional Services 6610 City of Huntington Beach $29.40 Water Use 6611 Inside CAL/EPA $535.00 Subscription 6612 Inside EPA $565.00 Subscription 6613 Intuitive Technology Corporation $4.624.00 Service Agreement 6614 IBM Corporation-Way $324.00 Service Contract 6615 IPCO Safety-Ca $1,775.06 Safety Supplies 6616 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc, $4,135.29 Instrument Parts 6617 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $3.500.00 Construction Services 6618 Jay's Catering $970.01 Directos Meeting Expense 6619 Jendham,Inc. $198.26 Publications 6620 Johnstone Supply $505.28 Electric Parts 6621 J2 Printing Services $1.230.51 Printing 6622 Kabbare Engineering $1.074.42 Plans&Specifications 6623 Kaher Foundation Health Plan $21.829.07 Medical Insurance Premium 6524 Kelar Training Centers $12.425.00 Training Registration(For 16 Employees) County Sanitation Dislncts Of Orange County Claims Paid 09/17/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 6625 Kembon Pacific,Inc. $2.394.93 Fordo Chloride MO9-27-95 6626 Karroo Engineering Company,Inc $441.94 Meter 6627 Kennedy Hydraulics $4.100.97 Motor Repairs 6628 Knox Indu itnal Supplies $7.410.22 Tools 6629 L.A.Cellular Telephone Company $337.08 Cellular Telephone Service 6630 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. $1.213.92 Safety Supplies 6631 Lamson Corp $197.33 Filters 6632 Law/Crandall $10.266.57 Soil Testing NO 7.13-94 6633 League Of Co Cities $275.00 Conference Registration 6634 Liquid Handling Systems $5,438.35 Pump Paris 6635 Lustre-Cal $357.23 Safety Supplies 6636 Maintenance Products.Inc. $2,088.42 Mechanical Supplies 6637 Maintenance Technology Corp. $566.86 Welding Supplies 6638 Mantok $323.22 Groundskeeping Supplies 6639 Mar Vac Electronln $42.67 Instrument Supplies 6640 Massachusetts Oman Technology $95.00 Workshop Registration 6641 Mastering Computers $995.00 Training Registration 6642 MC Junkin Corp $144.80 Plumbing Supplies 6643 Mc In Instruments $58.67 Lab Supplies 6644 McMaster-Cary Supply Co. $667.24 Tools 6645 Medlin Controls Co. $27.67 Instrument Supplies ty 6646 Midway Mfg 8 Machining On $7.817.99 Mechanical Repairs to 6647 Milllrenics Inc $456.48 Electric Supplies y 6648 Mission Uniform Service $4.189.54 Uniform Rentals y 6649 Moreland&Associates $19,777.25 Auditing Services MO 3-5-95 6650 Motion Industries $116.41 Pump Pans 6651 Motorola $8,208.14 Instrument Pans 6652 MotePhoto $13.88 Photographic Services 6653 MPS Photographic Services, Inc $103.46 Photographic Services 6654 Mine Safety Appliances Company $1.107.89 Instrument Supplies 6655 National Seminars Group $69.00 Seminar Registration 6656 National Technology Transfer $4,001.66 Training Registration(For 13 Employees) 6657 Neal Supply Co $3,161.45 Plumbing Supplies 6658 Nickey Petroleum Co Inc $2.279.55 Lubricants/Diesel Fuel 6659 Omega Corp $150.85 Severity System Repairs 6660 Orange County Wholesale Electric $1.551.99 Instrument Supplies 6661 Orange Vii&Fitting Company $680.56 Fittings 6662 Ortiz Fire Protection $735.00 Service Agreement 6663 Oxygen Servlco Company $2,850.49 Specialty Gases 6664 OC-ASTD $105.00 Membership 6665 P.L.Hawn Company Inc. $110.25 Electric Supplies 6666 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2,316.95 Plumbing Supplies 6667 Pacific Parts And Controls $3.534.26 Instrument Parts 6668 Padre Jamtonal Supplies $4.716.87 Jamumal Supplies 6669 Palmier.Tyler,Wlener,Wilhelm $110.00 Legal Services 6670 Parker Motion&Controls Sales $72.52 Filters County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County 4' Claims Paid 09/17/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 6671 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. $282.06 Tires 6672 Patriot Video Productions $816.28 Video Taping Services 6673 Perkin-Elmer Corp. $102.54 Filters 6674 Polypure,Inc.Wor Ploydyne $6,841.78 Cationic Polymer MO 3,11-92 6675 Precision Speedometer Service $135.20 Recelibrete Speedometer 6676 Pulsafeader,Inc. $904.40 Pump Parts 6677 Pub melster,Inc. $1.075.61 Pump Parts 6678 R 8 J Sheet Metal,In. $18.563.00 Install Skylight Fall Guards 6579 Rainbow Disposal Co.,Inc. $6.480.15 Trash Remwal 6680 Realtime Systems Corporation $1,000.00 Integration$Support Services 6681 Remedy $10,314.88 Temporary Employment Services 6682 Ryan Herod Products Corp. $717.48 Metal 6683 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. $830.02 Paint Supplies 6684 Safety-Kheen $193.50 Service Agreement 6685 Santa Ana River Flood Protection $1,400.00 Membership 6686 Scott Specialty Gases Inc. $626.43 Specialty Gams 6687 Second-Sun $1.201.39 Light Fixtures 6688 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. $127.23 Tools 6689 Shurelum Sales B Engineering $1,140.64 Tools/Hardware 6690 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. $762.65 Lab Supplies 6691 So Celli Marine Institute $965.00 Rental Equipment H 6692 Sparkletts $2.155.58 Drinking Water/Cooler Rental !p 6693 State Board Of Equai'aation $354.00 1997 Hazardous Waste Generator Fee N H 6694 Summit Steel $860.06 Metal Chemicals 6695 Super Cho.Corporation $ .N 6896 Super Ice Corporation $131.36 Lab Supplies 6697 Surveyors Service Company $90.87 Tools 6698 Symms,Inc. $3,640.00 Consulting Services 6699 Synergistic Performance Corporation $126.35 Freight 6700 Systems ID Warehouse $2,079.00 Laser Kit 6701 Taylor Industrial Software $5,035.00 Service Agreement 6702 The Economics Press $46.50 Publication 6703 Thompson Industrial Supply,In $3,594.90 Mechanical Parts 6704 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service 8 S $68.08 Locks&Keys 6705 Aerolund FlnancialiTop Hat Productions $402.70 Directors'Meeting Expense 6706 Toshiba International Corporation $3.393.52 Instrument Parts 6707 Trebor Electronics $3,0SC64 Electric Supplies 6703 Tri-State Seminar On-the-River $40.00 Seminar Registration 6709 Truck and Auto Supply,Inc. $584.89 Truck Paris 6710 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $464.00 Lab Services 6711 Tuthill Corp $7,550.25 Valve 6712 U.S.Filler $1,262.75 Lab Supplies 6713 Ultra Scientific $469.00 Lab Supplies 6714 United Parcel Service $12.00 Parcel Services 6715 United States Postal Sondes $5,000.00 Postage 6716 Valley cities Supply Company $488.40 Plumbing Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of orange County Claims Paid 09/17/97 Cheri No. Vendor Amount Description 6717 Varian Chromatography Systems $7,239.00 Service Agreement 671E Verne's Plumbing $1,264.58 Plumbing Services 6719 Vertex Business Systems $2295.00 Office Furniture 6720 Village Nurseries $218.73 Landscaping Supplies 6721 Mstar Auto Glass $75.00 Truck Parts 6722 VWR Scientific Products $3.302.42 Lab Supplies 6723 The Wackenhut Corporation $14,876.40 Contract Service-Security Guards 6724 Waste Markets $12,118.03 Residuals Removal MO 3-27-98 6725 Water Environment Federation $106.25 Training Registration 6726 Weschler Instruments $531.59 Meter 6727 Wesco DtsldbiBon Inc. $1.445.96 Instrument Supplies 6728 Western Regional Backilovr Conference $100.00 Conference Registration 6729 Western States Chemical Inc. $8.167.98 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 6730 Westslde Building Material Corporation $35.17 Luba Oil 6731 Wiliam Hamilton&Associates $450.00 Consulting Services 6732 Witeg Scientific $825.42 Lab Supplies 6733 WEFTEC'97 $410.00 Conference Registration 6734 Xerox Corporation $14,128.80 Copier Leases 6735 Axis Systems and Wllllam Pierce S3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program tttnnn 6736 Circuit City and Jeff Peterson $3,0D0.00 Employee Computer Loan Program y4 6737 Circuit City and John Gonzalez $3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program i..i 6738 Computopia and Tyler Hoang $1.386.72 Employee Computer Loan Program m 6739 Dell Computer Corp.and Regina Sabine $2.622.71 Employee Computer Loan Program H 6740 Jed L.Elliott $2.670.05 Employee Computer Loan Program y 6741 Environmental Water Bar.&Roland McReynolds $1,038.20 Employee Computer Loan Program m 6742 Mike Herram $154.04 Expense Reimb, 6743 Roland McReynolds 57,983.80 Employee Computer Loan Program 6744 NexCom Technology and John Weingamen $2,504.86 Employee Computer Loan Program 6745 NexCom Technology Inc.and Ramon Gomez $1.219.95 Employee Computer Loan Program 6746 Nylon Computer and David A.BIN $2.096.31 Employee Computer Loan Program 6747 Michael L.Peterman $225.64 Expanse Relmb. 6748 PC Mu and George Thum, $1,959.56 Employee Computer Loan Program 6749 PC Max and Jack Vincent $2,628.08 Employee Computer Loan Program 6750 Henry R.Salgado $131.92 Expense Reimb. 6751 The Beat and Jose Ambriz $2,094.66 Employee Computer Loan Program 6752 Donald B.VanVwmt $1.122.03 Employee Computer Loan Program 6753 Weal Tech and Mika Berths $2,181.94 Employee Computer Loan Program 6754 Nancy J.Wheatley $379.00 Expense Reimb. 6755 Charles F.Winter $800.25 Expense Reimb. 6756 County of Orange $1,545.00 Administrative Fees 6757 County Sanitation Districts of O C $2.446.08 Workera Comp Reimb. 6758 County Sanitation Districts of O C $1.303.15 Petry Cash Reimb. Total Claims Paid 09/17/97 $1.638,900.08 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 09/17/97 Summery Amount District No.3 $637.88 District No.7 $32,625.00 District No.11 $122.00 CORF $365,548.98 Self Insurance Funds $2,446.08 Joint Operations $1.236,520.14 $1,638.900.08 x H b1 H H 0fy J County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claim Paid 10/01/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 6786 American Telephone B Telegraph-Cellular CR BR $2.74 Long Distance Telephone Services 6787 American Telephone B Telegraph-Cellular CR BR $1.56 Long Distance Telephone Services 6788 American Telephone&Telegraph-Megacem Service $233.50 Long Distance Telephone Services 6789 American Telephone 8 Telegraph-Megacem Service $843.30 Long Distance Telephone Services 6790 A-Plus Systems $2,794.84 Notices 8 Ads 6791 Air Liquids America Corporation $2,24&31 Specialty Gasses 6792 Air Products and Chemicals,Inc. $108.89 O&M Agreement Oay Gen.Syst.NO 8449 6793 Allied Electronics,Inc. $210.82 Electric Parts 6794 Alpha Research Group $1,410.00 OnSfte Training 6795 America Payroll Association $175.00 Membership 6796 American Airlines $6,434.78 Travel Services 6797 American Bar Association $70.95 Seminar Registdion 6798 American Management Association 5290.00 Seminar Registdion 6789 American Society For Industrial $655.00 Seminar Reglstnion 6800 Anew/Anaheim Foundry $109.43 Penult Refund 6801 Anthony Post Control,Inc. $755.00 Service Agreement 6802 Appleone Employment Service $1.159.20 Temporary Employment Services 6803 Applied Industrial Technology $41.56 Pump Pans 6804 Aquatic Bloomy And Consulting $235.00 Lab Supplies 6805 Argent Communications Group $332.50 Subscription 6806 Arizona Instrument $1,309.92 Instrument Supplies �+ 6807 Armor-Vao $414.00 Vacuum Truck Services 6808 ABdNJores Computer Services $642.60 Service Agreement 6809 Awards 8 Trophies By Bea $35.37 Plaques IW 6810 Azalea Software,Inc 5158.00 Software 6611 American Association Of Engineering Societies $174.00 Publication 6812 ABL,Inc. $199.00 Subscription 6813 American Society For Training&Development $150.00 Membership 6814 Banana Blueprint,Inc. $1,420.08 Printing NO 11-7-94 6815 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $1,700.75 Telephone Installation 6816 Battery Specialties $1,719AI Ba6enm 6817 Bently Nevada Corporation $935.00 Instrument Parts 6818 Bermingham Controls $613.56 Valves 6819 Beta Technology Inc $462.02 Probe Assembly 6820 Bloomberg L.P. $4.994.21 Financial Monitoring System NO 4-14-93 6821 Bona-Rue's $70.00 Truck Pans 6822 Best Bam $193.84 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 6823 Boyle Engineering Corporation $5.430.78 Engineering Services 7.18 6524 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $645.00 Janitorial Services MO 1-12-94 6825 Bureau of National Affairs $1,064.14 Subscription 6826 California Automatic Gale $176.08 Service Agreement 6827 California Environmental Controls $1.123.40 Mechanical Parts 6828 California Specialized Training Institute $250.00 Training Registration 6829 Celtrol,Inc. $1.163.36 Hardware 6830 Contra Corporation $168.24 Fiber Optic Cable 6831 Carleton Engineers 6 Consultants $4,370.00 Engineering Services-Air Quality r County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 101DI197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 6832 Camllo Engineers $4,010.01 Engineering Services P1-38,P2-43-3 6833 Catapult let. $9,932.00 On-Sfte Training 6834 Center for the Continuing Studies $45.00 Seminar Registration 6835 Century Safety $1,839.99 Safety Supplies 6836 Cerfnet $20.00 Computer Services 6837 Closson&Clcason $505.00 Landscape Construction Management 6838 Coast Fire Equipment $2,278.11 Service Agreement 6839 Cole-Pamrer Instrument Company $280.47 Lab Supplies 6840 Cole,Inc $70.00 Workshop Registration 6841 Compressor Components Of California $959.75 Pump Pans 6842 Compass"Incorporated $074.97 Computer Services 6843 Computer Library $2,580.61 Subscription 68" Consolidated Electrical Distributors $812.34 Electric Pans 6845 Consolidated Reprographics $81.00 Pringng Services 6846 Cooper Cameron Corporation $948.58 Engine Parts 6847 Copoke Capital,Ina $1,432.00 Color Copier Lease 6848 Corporate Express $1,682.16 Office Supplies 6849 County Sanitation District of Orange Cty $49.10 Rama.Petty Cash 6550 County Wholesale Electric Co. $3.347.85 Electric Parts 6651 Culligan Water $56.00 Soft Water Service 6852 CRC Press,Inc. $598.76 Lab Supplies 6853 CS Company $3,542.86 Plumbing Supplies b1 6854 CWEA $525.00 Training Registration y 6655 Datavauit $94.00 Oesite Back-Up Tape Storage hhpf 6858 De Guelle 6 Sons Glass Go. $170.54 Safety Glass N 6857 Del Mar Analytical $190.00 Bisolids Analysis 6858 Data Dental $91.56 Dental Insurance Plan 6858 Desert Palm Scottsdale Limited $144.38 Safety Supplies 6860 Diamond Liners,Inc. $404.88 Uner Material 6861 Digital Equipment Corporation $1,583.99 Office Equipment 6862 Dmxelbrook Engineering Co. $113.25 Connection Kit 6863 Dunr Edmrds Corporation $128.09 Paint Supplies 68M DGA Consultants,Inc. $10.871.64 Sunaying Services MO 641-94 6865 DME,Inc. $891.10 Compressor Pans 6866 EcoAnalysls,Inc. $20.00 Consulting Services 6867 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. $4,640.00 Medical Screening 6966 Electra Band,Inc. $4,773.33 Equipment Repair 6869 Enchanter,Inc. $4,900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-24-95 6870 Exporter, $117.92 Orange County Property Into Lease on CD Rom 6871 ENS Resources,Inc. $2.976.66 Professional Services 6872 Fiberbon $222.34 Fiber Optic Cable 6873 Fisher Scientific Sill Lab Supplies 6874 Flat and Vertical,Inc. $240.00 Concrete Cutting 6875 Flo-Systems.Inc. $17.426.89 Pump Pans 6576 Fountain Valley Camera $155.06 Photo Supplies 6877 City of Fountain Valley $14.030.88 Water Use County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/01/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 6878 Franklin Ouest Co. $348.78 Office Supplies 6879 Frazee Palm and Wallmvering $202.46 Paint Supplies 6880 Fiys Electronics $1.639.45 Electronic 3 Computer Supplies 6BBI Ganahl Lumber Company S34B.25 Lumbar/Hardware 6882 Gar att-Callahan Company $1,998.77 Chemicals 6883 General Petroleum $9,940.40 Unleaded Gasoline 68&4 GTE California $782.37 Telephone Services 6885 Gelinge Castle $564.99 Lab Supplies 6896 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. $14,259.93 Pump Parts 6887 Goideowest Window Service $1,658.00 NBndow Cleaning Service 6898 Graphic Controls $171.33 Office Supplies 6889 Greseby STl $255.24 Engine Pads 6890 The Great American Printing Co $2,017.44 Printing 6891 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $228.95 Janitorial Supplies 6892 GST,Inc./Micro City $1,606.79 Office Supplies 6893 Hanker Equipment Company $37.00 Truck Parts 6894 Harold Pdmroae Ice 548.00 Ica For Samples 6895 Hatch&Kirk Inc. $4.913.18 Truck Parts 6896 Haulaway Storage Containers $2.298.00 Container Rentals 6897 HewleK-Packard $88.36 Service Agreement 6898 High-Point Randal $1.253.50 Consulting Services 6899 Hoerblger Service Inc $924.97 Compressor Parrs 6900 Holmes&Narver Inc $10,000.00 Engineering Services y 6901 Steve Hovey $82.96 Medical Insurance Reimb. ty 6902 Hunsaker Management,Inc. $874.00 User Fee Refund(Replacement Check) w 6903 City of Huntington Beach $13.095.38 Water Use 69U HACH Company 52,120.08 Lab Supplies 6905 Industrial Threaded Products $3.184.34 Connectors 6906 Innovation Group West $80.75 Publication 6907 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. $804.25 Lab Supplies 6908 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $50.10 Water Use 6909 Ism,Inc $129.84 Instrument 6910 IPCO Safety-Ca $989.62 Safety Supplies 6911 J.G.Tuctrer and Son,Inc. $370.70 Instrument Pads 6912 Jamison Engineering,Inc. 59,673.23 Construction Services 6913 Jays Catering $282.75 Directors'Meeting Expense 6914 Jim's Suspension Service $175.00 Truck Repairs 6915 Jabs Available Inc. $194.40 Notices&Ads 6916 Johnslom Supply $197.95 Electric Pads 6917 Kelly Paper $11.53 Paper 6918 Knox Industrial Supplies $1,660.43 Tools 6919 LssarAll Corporation $2,642.75 ServiceAgreement 6920 Law/Crandall $848.00 Soil Testing 743-94 6921 Lee&Re Inc $2,939.18 Engineering Services 6922 Lighting Resources Inc $900.26 Waste Recycling 6923 Lisa F.Loney $298.05 Expense Rome. County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/01/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 6924 Maintenance Products,Inc. $2.644.10 Mechanical Supplies 6925 Mar Vac Electronics $126.85 Instrument Supplies 6926 Me Junkin Corp $713.31 Plumbing Supplies 6927 Donald F.McIntyre $59.46 Expense Reimb. 6928 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $57.50 Tools 6929 Medlin Controls Co. $2,607.37 Instrument Supplies 6930 Midway Mfg&Machining Co $4,900.00 Mechanical Repairs 6931 Minnesota Western $379.39 Lab Supplies 6932 Mission Abrasive Supplies $98.48 Safety Supplies 6933 Mission Uniform Service $2.911-19 Uniform Rentals 69M Isiah J.Mitchell $150.82 Expense Reimb. 6935 Mobile Modular Management Corp $603.40 Office Trailer Lease 6936 Montgomery Watson $7,194.60 Air Toxice Project MO12-12-90 6937 Moore Products Co $75.12 Range Spring Kit 6938 Moreland&Associates $6,292.50 Auditing Services MO 34Y95 6939 Motorola $1,478.50 Instrument Parts 6940 MPS Photographic Services,Inc $50.12 Photographic Services 6941 Nancy F.Fainter, $1,425.00 Permit Fee Refund 6942 Natlonal Environmental Info Svc. $745.63 Lab Supplies 6943 Mickey Petroleum Co Inc $2.720.13 Lubricants/Diesel Fuel 6944 The Norco Companies $102.20 Mail Delivery Service H 6945 Once Depot Business Services $1,234.02 Office Supplies 6946 Orange County Business Council $50.00 Conference Registration 13 6947 Orange County Wholesale Electric $12,287.65 Instrument Supplies [0 6948 Orange Valve&F811ng Company $152.14 Fittings ,p 6549 P.L.Hewn Company Inc. $35.56 Electric Supplies 6950 Pacific Ball $1,309.93 Telephone Services 6951 Pacific Conference $160.00 Conference Registration 6952 Pacific Pens and Controls, In $9,556.49 Instrument Parts 6953 Padre Janitorial Supplies $174.14 Janitorial Supplies 695E Pagenet $624.81 Rental Equipment 6955 Pans Unlimited $946.97 Truck Pads 6956 Pavement Coatings Co. $1,600.00 Blacktop Repair 6957 permaseal $9,746.41 Luba Oil 6956 Power Electra Supply Co.,Inc. $31.88 Electric Supplies 6959 Power Maintenance International $6,0116.00 Maintenance Agreement 6960 PresMium Inc $2,083.33 Workers Comp Claims Adlmn. 6961 R.F.MacDonald Go. $2,856.39 Electric Supplies 6962 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. $1,014.00 Paint Supplies 6963 Seth Specialty Gases Inc. $543.68 Specialty Gases 6956 Scott,Reilly&Whitehead $3,692.32 Legal Services-Personnel Issues 6965 Sea-Bird Electronics,Inc. $565.00 Lab Repairs 6966 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $7,597.77 Tools/Hardware 6967 Sievers $745.88 Lab Supplies 608 SigmerAMrieh,Inc. $149.93 Lab Supplies 6969 Silempom Communications Inc. $1,129.00 Publications 6970 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. $202.79 Plumbing Supplies County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/01/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 6971 Sonic Systems,Inc. $3,688.D0 Computer Equipment 6972 South Coast Water $12.5.00 Lab Supplies 6973 Southern California Gas Company $15,CD0.00 Natural Gas 6974 Special District Board Mgmt.Institute $990.00 Seminar Registration 6975 Sprint $30.00 Long Distance Telephone Services 6976 Standard Supply&Equipment Cc $61.20 Pump Parts 6977 SlateNal $495.00 Legislative&Regulatory Tracking Services 6978 Steven Enterprises,Ina $2,700.00 Maintenance Agreement 6979 Summit Steel $1,351.19 Motel 6980 Sunset Ford $2.669.94 Truck Pans 6981 Tinny of Delaware Inc. $9,122.00 Pumps 6982 The Register $100.45 Notices&Ads 6983 Theodore Robbins Ford $194.76 Vehicle Rental 6984 Thomas M.Dawes,P.E. $7,905.D0 Professional Services MO 4-23-97 6985 Time Motion Tools $192.86 Electric Pans 6988 Time Warner Communications $40.47 Cable Services 6987 Then Power,Iris. $9,750.00 Maintenance Agreement 6988 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&S $109.05 Lacks&Keys 6989 Aerofund Financairrop Hot Productions, $107.21 Directors'Meeting Expense 6990 Tomell&Coiten $3.096.20 Legal Services 6991 Troplal Plaza Nursery,Inc. $10.414.84 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11.94 i..i 6992 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $194.81 Truck Parts m 6993 Truesdell Laboratories,Ink, $302.00 Lab Services H 6994 Tustin Dodge $41.45 Truck Parts b1 6985 TAL Technologies,Inc. $207.00 Software N 6988 Technic Computer Service Corp. $3,6DD.00 Printer Maintenance 6997 TPC Training Systems $448.69 Training Software 6998 The Unisource Corporation $5,120.28 Office Supplies 6999 United Parcel Service $623.19 Parcel Services 7000 Valley Cliffs Supply Company $2.775.89 Plumbing Supplies 7001 Varian $177.79 Lab Supplies 7002 Village Nurseries $140.60 Landscaping Supplies 7003 V WR Scientific Products $8.824.43 Lab Supplies 70D4 The Wall Street Journal $299.00 Subscription 7005 Water Education Foundation $9.59 Publication 7006 Waste.Slates Chemical Inc. $18,854.94 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 7007 Nancy J.Wheatley $304.10 Expense Reimb. 7008 Wordwetch Institute $20.00 Subscription 7009 W W Grainger Inc. $156.80 Compressor Pads 7010 Blake Anderson $879.37 Expense Reimb. 7011 Axis Systems and Allan Dumlao $1.772.20 Employee Computer Loan Program 7012 Jeffrey Brown $250.00 Expense Reimb. 7013 Mark Castillo $1.168.01 Expense Reimb. 7014 David M.Chafe $162.10 Expense Reimb. 7015 Circuit City and Lynda Nunez $2,846.98 Employee Computer Loan Program 7016 Cyber Tsk and Bob Michna $1,146.30 Employee Computer Lean Program County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/01/97 Check No, Vendor Amount Description 7017 Absalon G.Decastro,Jr $139A0 Expense Reimb. 7018 Dell Computer and Blake Anderson $2,881.80 Employee Computer Loan Program 7019 Mike Herrera $535.41 Expense Reimb. 7020 Mike J.Hamra $162.15 Expense Reimb. 7021 Vlaillmr A.Kogan $250.00 Travel Advance 7022 Terry W.Me $586.76 Expense Reimb. 7023 Use F.Lamy $2,805.04 Employee Computer Loan Program 7024 Samuel L.Mowbray $233.08 Expense Reimb. 7025 Neacam Technology and Allan Demise $492.30 Employee Computer Loan Program 7025 Nylon Computer and Carina Chaudry $1.402.88 Employee Computer Loan Program 7027 Nylon Computer and Dionne Kendos $2,957.75 Employee Computer Loan Program 7028 Nylon Computer and Mark Castillo $1,765.69 Employee Computer Loan Program 7029 Fred J.O'Brien $2.543.54 Employee Computer Loan Program 7030 Robert C.Thompson $560.0D Expense Rehnb. 7031 Edward M.Tortes $250.00 Expense Reimb. 7032 County of Orange $3,45040 Administrative Fees 7033 County Sanitation District of OC $1.487.90 Reimb.Petty Cash 7034 American Bar Association $10.00 Publication 7035 Southern California Edison $60.00 Conference Registration 7036 Raisin Instrument Co.,Inc $157.13 Portable Power Pack 7037 SkillPam Seminars $236.00 Seminar Registration 7038 Western Component Sales North $46.45 Instrument Supplies y 7039 Advance Constructers,Inc. $597,246.00 Construction J-34-1,P2-3&5 H 7040 Bio Oro Division $38,818.39 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 Ip 7041 Camp Dresser 8 McKee Inc. $309.571.00 Engineering Services ch 7042 Centrepointe Commercial Interiors $54,393.30 Office Fumilure 7043 Dell Marketing L.P. $45,343.36 Computers 7044 General Electric Supply Company $43.402.83 Switchboard 7045 General Process Controls $31,752.24 Leval Controls 7046 Kemimn PeGBc,Inc. $53,166.33 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 7047 Margate Construction $1,058,018.00 Construction PI-35-2 7048 Margate Construction Inc. $172.400.00 Construction PI4&2(Rebid),P247-2(Rebid) 7049 Margate Construction,Inc. $467.636.73 Construction P141,PI.43 7050 Nat West Markets $69.049.64 LOC Fees 7051 Network Catalyst SW.640.00 Maintenance Agreement 7052 Orange County Water District $59,606.40 GAP Water Use MO&9.93 7053 Pima Gro Systems Inc 585,895.71 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 7054 Polypure,Inc.B/er Ploydyne, $25,379.01 Cationic Polymer MO 3A 1.92 7055 RD Instruments $58,300.00 Lab Equipment MO 5-28-97 7056 Science Applications Intl.,Co $511920.31 Oconee Monitoring MO 6-8-94 7067 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $395.295.30 Construction P2-35-3,P1-38.5.P246.P2-55 7058 Thompson Industrial Supply,In $58.286.13 Mechanical Pads 7D59 Tule RancMktagan Farms $32.062.71 Residuals Removal 7060 Woodruff,Spradlin It Smad $70.15M.60 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 7061 Local Agency Formation Commission $3.11M.00 Districts Consolidation Application Pas 7062 Coleman/Caskey Architects,Inc $5.229.50 Professional Services J-36-1 Count,Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/01/97 Description Check No. Vendor Amount 7063 Howard P.Lemb$e,Jr $240.00 Travel Advance 7054 Professional Services Ind. $1.623.00 Soils Testing 7065 Theodore Robbins Ford $123.66 Vehicle Rental 7066 Edward M.Toms $172.00 Expense Relmb. Total Claims Paid 10/01/97 $4,645,884.90 Summary Amount District No.3 $1,466.00 Diatrid No.5 $979.91 District No.7 $70,522.34 Disidd No.14 $12,693.08 CORF $3.123,543.12 Joint Operations $1,436.490.45 $4,645,684.90 N H pH1 I J For Ed e o AGENDA ❑ COMM.IYsO.ITEM ❑ COMM,ACTION ITEM ITEM ❑ Jr..BOS.CO TRANSMITTAL ❑ Jr.BpS.DISCUSSION (NON-CONSENT) ❑ PUBLI9n HEA.SING /tea`/ /�/JT.BpS.MEETING PATE 71A JT.BDS.AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMITS (Originator) PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR 2220/Ross H.Tipps/2558 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: /a/17/47 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordina: Ratifying Payment Of Claims Of The Joint And Individual Districts By Roll Call Vote (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Recommended Actionls): 1. Staff recommends ratification of payment of claims in accordance with the attached check listing. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES NO NOTAPPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC Date Notice of Exemption Filed ITEM: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on_ CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES Rom Bu tou. Ta .nl TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ N/A N/A N/A N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGETCHANGE REVISEDTOTAL INFORMATION BUDGET TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year In Budget: $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJE REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES NO NOT APPLICABLE It YES,state nuCTmber: —Permanent _Limited Term If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section s,,;,e W l"7 Page 1 of 2 HAV IRDTATIM2221ATIPP&AMWPD ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(List)'. ! iZA h 7 ,. Orfginatoi Date CO N /p7 i a ate Divisi n Man er( e ' n ATTACHMENTS 70 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(lpn (a 3 7 ,. Si DAte D anmam Head r Designee) Signature Dale Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background andlor Summary) c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager a„e.aovusv Page 2 of 2 HAWP.DTA,FIN1222MTIPPSWIT.WPD County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County s Claims Paid 10/15/97 Chock No. Vendor Amount Description 7087 Barclays Bank PLC $93.820.10 Loc Quarterly Fees 7088 Bid Gro Division $27,466.08 Residuals Removal M04-26-95 7089 Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. $87.800.00 Engineering Services 7090 Canoed Engineers $51.614.63 Engineering Services J33-2 7091 Dell Marketing L.P. $46.011.91 Computers 7092 Duke Energy Trading&Marketing $78.277.37 Nautural Gas 7093 General Physio Corp $541000.00 Professional Services 7094 J.D.Edwards World Solutions $07,390.00 Software License Fees MO 7.24-96 7095 Kemiron Pacft Inc. $65,295.54 Ferric Cloride MO 9-27-95 7096 Matra Health Accl Financial $132,225.61 Metro Premium 7097 Mike Prlich&Sons $104,683.09 Construction 335-R 7098 Orange County Wholesale Electric $30,452.54 Instrument Supplies 7099 Science Applications Intl.,Cc $46.398.56 Ocean Monitoring MO6-8-94 7100 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms $45,199.63 Residuals Removal 7101 A T&T-Magacem Service $2.596.15 Long Distance Telephone Services 7102 AT&T-Cellular CR&R $5.72 Long Distance Telephone Services 7103 Air Llgulde America Corporation $1,627.59 Specialty Gases 7104 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. $9,180.30 Manhole Frames&Covers 7105 American Metal Bearing Company $110.36 Credit Nate Reimbursement 71 W American Water Works Assoc $425.00 Conference Registration 7107 Anabolic,Inc. $210.D0 Credit Note Reimbursement 7108 Anthony Pest Control,Inc. $395.00 Service Agreement 7109 Apce Valve And Primer Corporation $703.69 Valve Parts 7110 Appleone Employment Service $3,000.81 Temporary Employment Services 7111 Awards&Trophies By Bea $70.90 Plaques 7112 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $200.00 Telephone Installation 7113 Battery Spede ies $4,728.20 Bafteries 7114 Bevce $122.88 Valve Paris 7115 Black Box Corporation SWIA1 Computer Parts 7116 Sol Delivery $107.00 Freight 7117 Boulevard Development Inc. $420.05 Refundable Annexation Fee 7118 Boyle Engineering Corporation $21,414.41 Engineering Services 7.71 7119 Boyle Engineering Corporation $12.312.63 Engineering Services 3-38 7120 Brown And Caldwell $3,646.80 Engineering Services P2-35-3,P2-35-3 7121 Bld Building News $141.06 Publications 7122 Calolympic Safety $1.926.43 Safety Supplies 7123 Caltrol,Inc. $4.294.02 Hardware 7124 Cashco,Inc. $78.39 Valve Parts 7125 City of Seal Beach $124.40 Water Use 7126 The City Associates,Inc $3,437.50 Hearing Officer Services 7127 Barbara A.Collins $354.06 Expense Reimb. 7128 Compucom $2.215.26 Software 7129 Compose,Inc. $415.30 Electronic&Computer Supplies 7130 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $481.96 Electronic Pans 7131 Construction Fabricators Inc. $5.921.16 Construction Services 7132 Continental-McLaughlin $318.76 Tools County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid IW15197 Check No, Vendor Amount Description 7133 Cooper Camaron Corporation $203.54 Engine Parts 7134 Corporate Express $197.70 Office Supplies 7135 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. $1.523.33 Mechanical Supplies 7136 County of Orange $169.0D Training Registration 7137 County of Orange $720.00 Administrative Fees 7138 County of Orange $6.800.00 Replenish Dist.11 Interest&Sinking Fund 7139 County Clark $38.0D Document Handling Fee 7140 County Wholesale Electric Co. $2,006.20 Electric Parts 7141 CPI-The Alternative Supplier $1,631.01 Lab Supplies 7142 CS Company $2.357.96 Plumbing Supplies 7143 CWEA $875.00 Conference Registrations 71" DYats Sales Company $10.82 Fittings 7145 Daily Pilot $68.75 Notices&Ads 7146 Del Mar Analytical $380.00 Blosollds Analysis 7147 Dover Elevator Company $1.067.63 Elevator Maintenance 7148 Dunkel Bros.Machinery Moving $600.00 Freight 7149 DGA Consultants,Inc. $1.764.16 Engineering Services 2-34R 7150 Eberhard Equipment $1,682.22 Equipment Repair 7151 EcaAnalysis,Inc. $40.00 Consulting Services 7152 Enchanter,Inc. $7,0D0.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 7153 Enlek IRD International $2,189.10 Equipment Repair 7164 Executive Enterprises $1.495.00 Seminar Registration 7155 Federal Express $503.25 Air Freight 7156 Filler Supply Company $686.95 Fibers 7157 FisherSchmfic $432.40 Lab Supplies 7158 Flat and Vertical,Inc. $266.00 Concrete Cutting 7159 Flo-Systems.Inc. $7,989.82 Pump Parts 7160 Fonts Benefits Insurance Company $17,453.11 Insurance Premiums Oct 97 7161 Fountain Valley Florist $89.43 Funeral Arrangement For Richard Randall 7162 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 3646.50 Palm Supplies 7163 Franklin Quest Co. $976.50 Office Supplies 7164 Fry's Electronics $5,188.96 Electronic B Computer Supplies 7165 City of Fullerton $326.16 Water Use 7166 Gallade,Chemical Inc. $346.20 Chemicals 7167 The Gas Company $2,664.91 Natural Gas 7168 Gerald B.Scheer, $1.637.50 Training Consultant 7169 Graphic Distributors $102.22 Photographic Supplies 7170 Grating Pacific Inc. $2.383.43 Fiberglass Grating 7171 The Great American Printing Co $145.43 Printing 7172 GST,Inc.I Micro City $8.150.79 Office,Supplies 7173 Harold Primrose Its $64.00 Ice For Samples 7174 High-Poinl Randal $1.081.00 Consulting Services 7175 Hoerbiger Service Inc $26.52 Compressor Pads 7176 Home Depot $658.26 Small Hardware 7177 Horibe Instruments Inc $907.98 Electric Pads 7178 City of Huntington Beach $21.25 Water Use 4 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10115197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7179 Hydmtex $4,476.69 Luba Oil 7180 Industrial Hearing 8 Pulmonary $2,485.00 Audiomehic&Pulmonary Testing Of Employees 7181 Industrial Threaded Products, $335.34 Connectors 7182 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $325.31 Lab Supplies 7183 Interstate Battery Systems $1.253.24 Batteries 7184 Was Photo Graphics $321.48 Photographic Supplies 7185 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $1,429.82 Instrument Parts 7186 J.D.Edwards $2,800.00 Training Registration 7187 J P.Nissen Co $56.32 Office Supplies 7188 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $2,333.07 Construction Services 7189 Jays Catering $2.321.15 Directors Meeting Expense 7190 Johnstone Supply $295.50 Electric Parts 7191 J2 Printing Services $85728 Printing 7192 Knox Industrial Supplies $253.94 Tools 7193 LA.Cellular Telephone Company $4.11W.59 Cellular Telephone Service 71 N La Palma Car Wash $1.228.11 Truck Wash Tickets 7195 Lab Safely SupplyJnc. 52,941.24 Set*Supplies 7196 Lab Systems $6.700.00 Installation Integration Services 7197 Labware Inc. $60g.00 Training Registration 7198 Lee 8 Ro Inc $19.183.14 Engineering Services 7199 Lessons In Leadership $299.00 Seminar Registration 7200 Deborah L.Lindel $730.20 Expense Reimb. 7201 Local Agency Formation Commission $1,950.00 Processing Fee 7202 LA Cellular Telephone Company $170.62 Telephone Equipment 7203 Maintenance Products,Inc. $6.734.21 Mechanical Supplies 7204 Maintenance Technology Corp. $522.05 Took 7205 Mc Fadden-Dale Hardware Co. $09.63 Coolant 7206 McKenna Engineering S Equipment $777.30 Valve Pads 7207 MCMasler-Carr Supply Co. $743.85 Tools 7208 Measurement Variables,Inc. $681.96 FBers 7209 Medlin Console Co. $721.12 Instrument Supplies 7210 Meeting Planners Plus $473.49 Professional Services 7211 Microtrac Laboratories,Inc. $4,140.00 Gas Analysis 7212 Microbe Masters $1.807.92 Advanced Bid Cultures 7213 Midway Mfg 8 Machining Co $1,030.00 Mechanical Repairs 7214 Mission Abrasive Supplies $598.01 Safety Supplies 7215 Mission Uniform Service $2,154.22 Uniform Rentals 7216 Moreland 8 Associates $11,543.32 Auditing Services MO 3895 7217 MotoPhoto $59.05 Photographic Supplies 7218 National Technical Information $35.50 Publication 7219 National Technology Transfer $595.00 Seminar Registration 7220 Neal Supply Company $128.22 Plumbing Supplies 7221 Network Catalyst $5.783.31 Consultant 7222 New Hor¢oms Computer Leaning $5,398.00 O"He Training 7223 Newark Electronics $276.27 Instrument Parts 72.24 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. $1,251.50 Lubricants/Diesel Fuel County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/15/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7225 The Norco Companies $100.55 Mail Delivery Service 7226 Occupational Vision Services $629.16 Safety Glasses 7227 Office Depot Business Services $1.987.96 Office Supplies 7228 Omega Corporation $1.796.81 Lab Supplies 7229 On Technology Corporation $2,922.75 Software Upgrades 7230 Orange County Business Council $20.00 Workshop Registration 7231 Orange County Farm Supply $345.12 Chemicals 7232 Orange Courier 5208.10 Couder Services 7233 Orange Valve 8 Fitting Company $194.33 Fittings 7234 Oxygen Service Company $2,053.57 Specialty Gases 7236 OI Coporetion $638.96 Lab Supplies 7236 P.L.Hawn Company Inc. $134.35 Eledrie Supplies 7237 Pacific Bell $19.35 Telephone Services 7238 Pacific Mechanical Supply $2.8D8.80 Plumbing Supplies 7239 Pacific Paris and Controls,Inc. $13.210.45 Instrument Pads 7240 Pacific Publishers $108.18 Publication 7241 Porkhouse Tim,Inc. $1,946.12 Time 7242 Palkson Corporation 5400.19 Freight 7243 Paris Unlimited $975.70 Truck Parts 72" Peak Technologies $130.00 Wax/Resin Ribbons 7245 Premier Fastener Company $311.27 Tools 7246 Presidium,Inc. $2,083.33 Worker;Comp Claims Administration. 7247 Progressive Business Publication $230.00 Subscriptions 7248 Public Officials for Water 8 Environmental Reform $310.00 Conference Registration 7249 Pubunaister,Inc. $52.91 Pump Parts 7250 PC Connection, Inc. $82.00 Computer Pads 7251 Quality Compressor,Inc. $1.562.38 Compressor 7252 R 8 J Sheet Metal,Inc. $2,062.00 Metal 7253 R B R Instrumentation,Inc. $1,976.83 Electric Paris 7254 Red Wing Shoes $309A6 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 7255 Reish Marine Studies,Inc. $460.00 Ocean Monitoring 7256 Rellastar $8,288.00 Life Insurance Premium 7257 Raliaslar Bankers Security Life Insurance $4.843.27 Voluntary Life Insurance Premium 7258 RM Controls $79.20 Office Supplies 7259 Sears $68.55 Office Supplies 7260 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 5449.64 Tools 7261 Shureluck Sales 8 Engineering $1,209.71 Tools y Hardware 7262 Sign,"drich,Inc. $289.21 Lab Supplies 7263 Sloan EleMC Company $11,600.00 Motor Repairs 7264 Smith Pipe 8 Supply Inc. $253.63 Plumbing Supplies 7265 So.Cal.Coalition for Pollution Prevention $250.00 Conference Registration 7266 Society for Human Resource Man $610.00 Seminar Registration 7267 Society of Env.Toxicelogy 8 Chemistry $670.00 Melling Registration 7268 Socc-Lynch Corp. $87.24 Janitorial Services 7269 South Coast Air Quality Mngi. $171.90 Permit Fees 7270 South Coast Air Quality Mgml. $9.492.60 Permit Fees .ems - County Sanitation Districts Of orange County Claims Paid 11ON5197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7271 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $11.170.10 Permit Fees 7272 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $171.90 Permit Fees 7273 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $5,157.00 Permit Fees 7214 South Coast Ab Quality Mgmt. $171.90 Permit Fees 7275 South Coast Air Ouality Mgmt. $171.00 Permit Fees 7276 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. $25.00 Permit Fees 7277 South Coast Water $180.00 Lab Supplies 7278 Southern California Air Conditioning Distributed, $1,384.69 Heat Pump 7279 SlateNet $98A0 Seminar Registration 7280 Sterling Art $14.76 An Supplies 7281 Steven Enterprises,Inc $708.92 Planer Supplies 7282 Strata International,Inc. $957.93 Chemicals 7283 Summit Steel $2,472.22 Metal 7284 Sunset Ford $144.00 Track Parts 7285 Sunset Industrial Pars $50.33 Hose 7256 Superb One-Hour Photo $21.16 Photographie Services 7287 The Holman Group $775.32 EAP Premium Got 97 7288 Thermo Jarrell Ash Baird $174.45 Pump Parts 7289 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $228.37 Mechanical Parts 7290 Transcet $1,005.14 Electrical Parts 7291 Tropial Plus Nursery,Inc. $3.973.84 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11.94 7292 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. $264.03 Truck Pads 7293 Truesdall Laboratories,Inc. $2,722.60 Lab Services 7294 Ultra Scientific $220.00 Lab Supplies 7295 United Parcel Service $48.85 Parcel Services 7296 UMan Water Institute,Inc. $175.00 Membership 7297 Velco Instruments Co.Inc. $283.94 Lab Supplies 7298 Valley China Supply Company $2.938.58 Plumbing Supplies 7299 Veme's Plumbing $40.00 Plumbing Services 7300 Vlllalobos B Associates $11.951.23 Engineedng Services 7301 VWR Scientific Products $6.628.42 Lab Supplies 7302 The Wackenhut Corporation $6.020.86 Contract Service-Security Guards 7303 Waste Markets $4,464.05 Residuals Removal MO 3-27-96 73N Water Environment Federated $1.201.50 Seminar Registration 7305 Waters Corporation $1,225.34 Service Agreement 7306 Wayne Electric Co. $362.04 Batteries 7307 Western Slates Chemical Inc. $17,872.16 Caustic Soda Mo 8.23-95 7308 Westinghouse Electric Corporation $23,000.00 Electrical Engineering Services 7309 Witeg Scientific $217.17 Lab Supplies 7310 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $3,618.17 Professional Services 7311 WEKA Publishing $74.00 Publication 7312 WW Grainger Inc. $661.59 Compressor Pads 7313 Xerox Corporation $3,455.58 Copier Lasses 7314 Yellow Springs Instrument Co., $90.39 Lab Supplies 7315 Blake Andaman $1.097.40 Expense Reimb. 7316 Nicholas J.Mantes $314.92 Expense Relmb. County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/15/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7317 Best Buy and Absalon Derastm $2.648.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 7318 Been M.Carrico $195.60 Expense Reimb. 7319 Patrick M.Carrillo $2,802.58 Employee Computer Loan Program 7320 George A.Charette $195.57 Expense Reimb. 7321 Peter Chaffs $224.31 Expense Reimb. 7322 Donald R.Cleveland $365.07 Expense Relmb. 7323 James E.Colston $1.929.15 Employee Computer Loan Program 7324 Ronald L.Dewitt,Jr $156.66 Expense Reimb. 7325 Darrell S.Ennis $196.81 Expense Reimb. 7325 Timothy D.Foley $167.75 Expense Reimb. 7327 Tom E.Gaworski $213.85 Expense Relmb. 7328 W.Doug Hauser $117.99 Expense Ralmb. 7329 Roy A.Nearly $356.20 Expense Relmb. 7330 Larry E.Lazorek $351.82 Expense Reimb. 7331 Cherie M.Leislen $174.26 Expense Reimb. 7332 Norma C.Leopando S71BA5 Expense Reimb. 7333 Michael E.McCarthy $230.16 Expense Reimb. 7334 Michael J.MCCusker $467.70 Expense Reimb. 7335 Scott M.Mebusl $355.10 Expense Reimb. 7336 John Mirkovich $139.80 Expense Reimb. 7337 Paul A.Mitchell $3.000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 7338 Nylon Computer and Mike McKusker $1.013.71 Employee Computer Loan Pmgmm 7339 Joseph W.Park,Jr. $354.63 Expense Relmb. 7340 Michael Reideler $174.26 Expense Reimb. 7341 Royal Computer and Ef tan Leman $2,724.76 Employee Computer Loan Program 7342 Joe D.Sanderson $425A9 Expense Reimb. 7343 RudoBSchaap $175.80 Expense Reimb. 73" James G.Tntle $351.82 Expense Reimb. 7345 Mitchell J.Trivanovich $381.82 Expense Reimb. 7348 Bobby L.Unsell $168.20 Expense Reimb. 7347 Simon L.Watson $30.00 Expense Reimb. 7348 Nancy J.Wheatley $192.10 Expense Reimb. 7349 James L.Wybenga $230.16 Expense Reimb. 7350 Michael 1.Zedek 5218A7 Expense Reimb. 7351 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County $12,828.64 Workers Comp Reimb. 7352 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County $1.016.63 Petry Cash Reimb. 7353 National Research Council Canada $325.00 Publications 7354 County Clerk $38.00 Permit Fees 7355 Local Agency Formation Commission $950.00 Permit Fees 7356 Science Applications Intl.,Co $10,918.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 7357 Jane H.Thin $173.17 Expense Reimb. 7358 Daniel E.Tunnicti8 $321.92 Expense Reimb. Total Claims Paid 10H5197 $1,d87,234.49 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/15/97 Summary Amount District No.2 $3,971.88 District No.3 $13,851.43 District No.7 $23,570.34 District No.11 $6,800.00 CORF $249,950.03 Self insurance Funds $12,828.64 Joint Operations $1,158,282.17 $1,487,234.49 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10129N7 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7378 Advances Constructors Inc $445.311.90 Construction J-34-1,P2455 7379 Air Products and Chemicals,Inc. $45,013.58 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen.Syst.MO 8-M9 7380 Airpol Construction,Inc. $255.657.58 Construction Pl-51R 7381 Blo Gap Division $25,202.68 Residuals Removal MO4-25-95 7382 Camilo Engineers $46.261.05 Engineering Services P11-38,P2-43.3 7383 Dell Marketing L.P. $42,130.77 Computers 7384 FMC Corporation-Chemlcal Products $117,62026 Hydrogen Peroxide MO 9.1494 7385 J.D.Edwards World Solutions $30.518.45 Software License Fees MO 7-24-96 7386 Kenumm Pacific,Inc. $103,964.61 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 7387 Labwere Inc. $53.650.00 Lab information Mgmt System Sofware 7388 Margate Construction Inc. $1.153.233.53 Construction P1-36-2,P1.41,P143 7389 Moo Analytical System $43.424.00 Professional Services 7390 Orange County Water District $47.251.20 GAP Water Use MO 6-9-93 7391 Pacificere of Ca $39.017.87 Medical Insurance Premium 7392 Pascal&Ludwig,Inc. $228.355.00 Construction J-33-2 7393 Pima Gen Systems Inc $85.198.65 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 7394 Polypure,Inc.&tor Polydyne,Inc. $42,794.87 Carbonic Polymer MO 3-11-92 7395 Remedy $27.449.28 Temporary Employment Services 7396 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $438.016.50 Construction P2-35.3 7397 Tula RanchlMagan Fames $38,444.09 Residuals Removal 7398 Weslem Slates Chemical Inc. $31,402.32 Caustic Soda Me 8.23-95 7399 Woodruff,Spradlin B Smart $56,214.46 Legal Services M07.26-95 7400 American Telephone&Telegraph-Cellular CR&R 54.38 Long Distance Telephone Services 7401 American Telephone B Telegraph-Cellular CR BR - $89.02 Long Distance Telephone Services 7402 A-Plus Systems $748.21 Notices&Ads 7403 Air Liquids America Corporation $298.85 Specialty Gasses 7404 Aladdin House $57.32 Mini Blinds 7405 Alta-Robbins,Inc. $293.16 Instrument Supplies 7406 Americn Media Inc. $1.688.45 Training Publications 7407 Anivier Inc. $1.625.05 Computer Supplies 7408 Appleone Employment Service $1,131.60 Temporary Employment Services 7409 Applied Industrial Technology $258.24 Pump Parts 7410 Ad's Disposal Service,Inc, $310.40 Toxic Waste Removal 7411 Asbury Environmental Services $35.00 Waste Oil Removal 7412 Ashme $416.00 Publications 7413 Assoc of Metropolitan Sewerage $590.00 Workshop Registration 7414 Awards&Trophies By Bea $34.98 Plaques 7415 ABM Business Marlines,Inc. $119.93 Office Supplies 7416 AM Leonard $91.48 Live Animal Traps 7417 AMAMeye Productivity Center $159.00 Seminar Registration 7418 AWSI $249.00 D.O.T.Training Program 7419 Bailey Fischer&Porter Company $9.23 Chlorination Supplies 7420 Bank of America $313.87 Banking Services 7421 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $1,915.69 Telephone Installation 7422 Battery Speciagles $417.21 Batteries 7423 Ben Meadows Company, Inc. $90.31 Tools County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10/29/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7424 Beman Press $115.54 Publication 7425 Black Progress Review $396.00 Ads&Notices 7426 Bella Radiator Service $172.40 Truck Repalrs 7427 Boll Delivery $111.00 Freight 7426 Berland International $1,095.76 Computer Pads 7429 Boyle Engineering Corporation $1.059.50 Engineering Services 7-18 7430 Brenner-Fiedler&Assoc Inc. $384.69 Generators 7431 Budget Janitorial,Inc. $3,605.00 Janitorial Services MO 1.12-94 7432 California Auto Refrigeration $83.73 Refrigerator Pads 7433 California Automatic Gale $1,017.81 Service Agreement 7434 California Comfort Vans $269.38 Van Pads 7435 Calolympic Safety $2.405.70 Safety Supplies 7436 Called,Inc. $1,248.18 Hardware 7437 Canus Corporation $513.66 Fiber Optic Cable 7438 Cad Warren&Co. $300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 7439 Cadeum Engineers&Consultants $15.75 Engineering Services-Air Quality 7440 Catapult Inc. $4,000.00 On-She Training 7441 Centrepolnte Commercial Int. $2.181.52 Office Furniture 7442 Century Safety $720.26 Safety Supplies 7443 The Cobb Group sli Subscription 7444 Compuserve Incorporated $927.52 Computer Services 7445 Computers Areerice,Inc. $1,587.15 Computer Supplies 7446 Compuxpress and Michell Slromgren $1,386.83 Employee Computer Loan Program 7447 Comiumpresa and Tim Colamonico $2.021.05 Employee Computer Loan Program 7448 Connell GM Paris $241.99 Truck Pads 7449 Consolidated Electrical Distributors $97.65 Electric Pads 745D Cooper Camemn Corporation $4,232.02 Engine Parts 7451 Copelce Capital,Inc. $1.432.00 Color Copier Lease 7452 Corporate Express $1,345.95 Office Supplies 7453 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. $1.447.03 Mechanical Supplies 7454 County Sanitation Matter of OC $69.45 Petty Cash Reimb. 7455 County Wholesale Electric Co. $4.930.83 Electric Parts 7456 Crane Pm Services $207.00 Crane Parts 7457 Celifomia Assoicialion Of Sanitation Agencies $25.00 Conference Registration 7458 CH2MHill $5.458.59 Professional Services 7459 Confidential Management Services $5,526.04 Professional Services 7460 CRC Press,Inc. $210.11 Lab Supplies 7461 CS Company $3,704.18 Plumbing Supplies 7462 CWEA $715.00 Seminar RegislNon 7463 Cnstopher D.Dahl $1.755.91 Expense Reimb. 7464 Del Mar Analytical $1,788.00 Biosallds Analysis 7465 Diamond H Recognition $38.02 Servica Awards 7466 Digital Equipment Corporation $5.665.00 Computer 7467 DGA Consultants.Inc. $1,855.00 Engineering Services MO 6-8-94 7468 DME,Inc, $1.970.40 Compressor Pads 7469 Eagle Distribution $867.13 Track Pads County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claim Paid 10/29/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7470 Eberhard Equipment $18144 Tractor Repair 7471 Edwards High Vacuum International $907,17 Lab Supplies 7472 Egghead Software $65.83 Software 7473 Electra Bond,Inc $4.716.76 Equipment Repair 7474 Eledrorack Products Co..Inc. $502.59 Permit Fee Refund 7475 Emergency Management Network $2,630.00 CPR 7 First Aid Training 7476 Enchanter,Inc. $4.900.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5-2"5 7477 Enterprise Rent-A-Car $1,030.26 Liability Claim Settlement 7478 Envision of Irvine and Terry Matthews $2,125.69 Employee Computer Loan Program 7479 Expedan $117.92 Orange County Property Info Lease on CD Rom 7480 Express Paper&Graphics Store $211.62 Paper 7481 ENS Resources. Inc. $6.065.46 Professional Services 7482 Fairbanks Scales,Inc $480.00 Service Agreement 7483 Fiber ron $711.75 Fiber Optic Cable 7484 Fllledlne Corporation $600.04 Filters 7485 Fleming Engineering,Inc. $4.246.11 Sewer Repair 7466 Flickinger Company $545.03 Pump Pans 7487 Flo-System,Inc. $3.014.53 Pump Pans 7488 Forken Engineering&Surveying $3,960.00 Engineering Services MO 6-25-97 7489 Foss Environmental $46.45 Freight 7490 Fountain Valley Camera $227.09 Photo Supplies 7491 Fountain Valley Pelnts,Inc. $822.30 Paint Supplies 7492 Franklin Quest $536.00 Seminar Registration 7493 Franklin Quest Co. $98.64 Office Supplies 7494 Fry's Electronics $730.00 Electronic&Computer Supplies 7495 Fys Electronics and Steve Pelletier $2.908.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 7496 Gallade Chemical Inc $395.66 Chemicals 7497 Garraft-Callahan Company $113.14 Chemicals 7498 Gartner Group Inc. $10,775.00 Software 7499 Gates Fiberglass Installers $12,504,12 Equipment Repair 7500 General Binding Corporation $1.007.99 Office Machine Repairs 7501 GTE Cal0omia $9.953.80 Telephone Services 7502 Gienlch-Mitchell,Inc. $3,313.25 Pump Parts 7503 Govemment Finance Officer Assam. $85.00 Agency Membership 7504 Graphic Distributors $853.92 Photographic Supplies 7505 Graseby STl $8,160.47 Engine Pans 7506 The Great American Pdnting Co $525.47 Printing 7507 Great Western Sanitary Supplies $1.039.84 Janitorial Supplies 7508 Haldeman Inc. $170.09 Pump Pans 7509 Harold Pnmrese Ice $80.00 Ice For Samples 7510 Harrington Industrial Plastics $7,373.76 Plumbing Supplies 7511 Hatch&Klrk Inc. $4.111.10 Truck Pans 7512 Haulaway Storage Containers SIA88.00 Container Rentals 7513 Herb's Blackforest Bakery&Deli $24.90 Directors'Meeting Expense 7514 Heresite Protective Coatings $157.21 Protective Coaling Spray 7515 Hewlett-Packard $285.39 SeMce Agreement County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 102997 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7516 Hilll Inc $1,413.65 Tools 7517 Holmes 8 Narver Inc $8.180.84 Engineering Services 7518 Linda L.Holmes $2,406.25 Hearing Officer 7519 Home Depol 5346.07 Small Hardware 7520 Horiba Instruments Inc $911 Electric Paris 7521 Huntington Pool B Spa Supply $355.52 Pump 7522 HACH Company $135.00 Water Testing Chemicals 7523 Industrial Steam 54,435.08 Pumps 7524 Industrial Threaded Products 53,966.22 Connectors 7525 Information Resources $1.485.00 Personnel Services 7526 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. $159.55 Lab Supplies 7527 Interstate Battery Systems $831.24 Batteries 7528 Irvine Ranch Water Districts $52.66 Water Use 7529 IBM Corporation-Way $640.00 Service Contract 7530 IDEXX Distribution Corp. $150.60 Lab Supplies 7531 IPCO Safety-Ca $580.11 Safety Supplies 7532 ISA Publications $735.00 Subscription 7533 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. $1,073.98 Instrument Pads 7534 J.P.Morgan Securities $22,947.12 COP Remarketing Agreement MO 4-26.95 7535 Jamison Engineering,Inc. $6.963.12 Construction Servces 7536 Janice E.Mclnally,MFCC $1,597.00 Professional Services-EAP 7537 Jays Catering $975.21 Directors'Meeting Expanse 7538 Johnstone Supply $498.70 Electric Paris 7539 JWC Elrvironmental $11,247.16 Service Agreement 7540 Kaiser FourMalbn Health Plan $22,328.49 Medical Insurance Premium 7541 Kama Johnson $132.47 Claim Settlement 7542 Kewaunee Scientific Corporation $3,215.48 Office Furniture 7543 Kimme to Bros.,Inc. 517.76 Mechanical Parts 7544 Knowledge Paint $1,200.00 On-She Training 7545 Knox Industrial Supplies 33.495.72 Tools 7546 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. $117.72 Safety Supplies 7547 Laidlaw Environmental Svcs $8,440.54 Hazardous Material Disposal 7546 LawrAll Corporation $2,521.53 Service Agreement 7549 Lbbed,Cassidy B Frierson $6,SW.00 Professional Services 7550 Limbo Vision $118.53 Photographic Services 7551 Maintenance Products,Inc. $7,T73.0D Mechanical Supplies 7552 Mainlenanace Technology Corp. $194.76 Tools 7553 Managing Automation Software Guides $10.00 Publication 7554 Mar Vac Electronics $23916 Instrument Supplies 7555 Marcy Rothenberg $150.00 Professional Services 7556 Masune Company $916.55 Safety Supplies 7557 Medlin Controls Co. $1,344.87 Instrument Supplies 7558 Mercury Insurance Group SS89.73 Claim Settlement 7559 Mesa Muffler $100.41T Truck Parts 7560 Mica Canter and Terry Matthew $462.94 Employee Computer Loan Program 7561 Mid-West Associates $5.397,68 Pump Part. County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 1029/97 Cherie No. Vendor Amount Description 75M Midway Mfg&Machining Co $8,748.36 Mechanical Repairs 7663 Millbonlp Inc $911.71 Electric Supplies 7554 Mission Uniform Service $2.187.39 Uniform Rentals 7585 Mobile Modular Management Corp $258.60 Officer Trailer tease 7566 Montgomery Watson $1,148.05 Professional Services MO 2-26-97 7557 Motorola $527.62 Instrument Paris 7568 MotoPhoto $18.04 Photographic Services 7569 MPS Photographic Services,Inc $214.67 Photographic Services 7570 Mina Safety Appliances Company $717.77 Electric Supplies 7571 National Assoc of Stale Puroh.Officials $53.45 Publication 7672 National Plant Services,Inc. $3,330.00 Vacuum Truck Services 7573 National Safety Council $500.00 Membership 7574 Netlink Ltd. $4,459.01 Radio System 7575 Network Catalyst $3,752.38 Fiber Optic Cable 7576 New Horizons Computer Learning $6,0110.01) On-Ske Training 7577 Newark Electronics $32.57 Instrument Parts 7578 Newreel, Inc. $1,238.00 Permit Fees 7579 Nexcom and Terry Matthews $289.95 Employee Computer Loan Program 7550 The Norco Companies $103.00 Mail Delivery Service 7581 Numatic,Engineering li Vahm,Paris 7582 Office Depot Business Services $2,007.0 Office Supplies 7583 Oracle Corporation $23,406.53 License Fears&Consulting Services 7584 Orange County Red Cross $120.00 Safely Training 7585 Orange County Wholesale Electric $666.23 Instrument Supplies 76M Orange Valve&Fitting Company $2.104.82 Fittings 7587 Orilex Co. $7.801.75 Pump Pads 7588 Orrick,Herrington&Sutcl169 $4,000.00 Professional Services-Financial Program 7589 Oxygen Service Company $1,789.87 Specialty Gases 7590 OAG $1.049.76 Software License 7591 P.L.Hawn Company Inc. $51.18 Electric Supplies 7592 Pacific Bell $1.309.87 Telephone Services 7593 Pacific Mechanical Supply $5,326,66 Plumbing Supplies 7594 Pacific Pads and Controls,Inc. $16,751.70 Instrument Pads 7695 Facts Janitorial Supplies $293.61 Janitorial Supplies 7596 Pagenet 5895.69 Rental Equipment 7697 Panel Concepts,Inc. $780.43 Permit Fee Refund 7598 Parkhouse Tito,Inc. $530.80 Time 75" Patriot Video Productions $310.91 Video Taping Services 7600 Paulus Engineering,Inc. $7,922.00 Construction 2-7A 7601 Peak Technologies $1,736.00 Office Supplies 7602 Pocket Flight Guide $96.00 Publication 7603 Poly Enterprises Inc., $603.40 Safety Supplies 7604 Power Electre Supply Co.,Inc. $18.60 Electric Supplies 7605 Power Systems Testing Company $5,225.00 Electric Parts 7606 Presidium Inc $2,083.33 Workers Comp Claims Administration. 7607 Pryor Resources,Inc. $166.07 Seminar Registration County sanitation Districts Of Orange County " Claims Paid 10129197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7608 Pumping Solutions Inc $9.405.58 Mechanical Supplies 76D9 R$R Instrumentation,Inc. $140.64 Electric Pans 7610 Reaitlme Systems Corporation $212.50 Consulting Services 7611 Reliastar $11,797.08 Life Insurance Premium 7612 Roma Sales Company,Inc. $7,540.00 Service Agreement 7613 Ruben&Tucker Alomeys at law $6.263.79 Legal Services 7614 RD Instruments $90.62 Freight 7615 RUN Group,Inc $9,000.00 Service Agreement 7816 RMS Engineering 6 Design,Inc $947.00 Engineering Services 7617 RPM ElecMc Motors $1,341.50 Electric Motor Pane 7618 Safety Images $150.85 Safety Supplies 7619 Sancon Engineering,Inc. $2,500.00 Engineering Semims 7620 Schanck Trebel $1.053.80 Balancing Machine Printer 7621 Science Applications Intl.,Cc $11,507.03 Oman Monitoring M0641-94 7622 Scott Spscisity,Gases Inc. $187.28 Specialty Gases 7623 Sinn,Reilly 8 Whitehead $538.22 Legal Services-Personnel Issues 7624 Sea-Bird Elecbronim.Inc. $250.00 Lab Repeals 7625 SemndSun $1.337.87 Light Fixtures 76M Showbiz Pizza Time $397.98 Permit Fee Refund 7627 Shureluck Sales 5 Engineering $8.072.98 Tools/Hardware 7628 Steven $330.98 Filters 7629 Simon 6 Schuster $345.86 Publications 7630 Skala,,Inc. $289.00 Equipment Repair 7631 Skill Craft Body Shop $442.77 Claim Settlement 7632 Soco-Lynch Corp. $482.72 Janitorial Supplies 7633 South Coast Water $10.00 Lab Supplies 7834 Southem California Edison $12.294.67 Electrical Facilities Relocation Charges 7835 Southern California Edison $50.00 Conference Registration 7636 Southwest Scientific Inc. $1,149.15 Instrumerd Parts 7637 Sperkistts $2.015.62 Drinking Water 7 Cooler Rentals 7638 Spex Cedprop Inc. $1.453.40 Lab Supplies 7639 Sprites Company, Inc. $9.126.43 Janitorial Supplies 7640 Staminet Inc. $95.90 Service Agreement 7641 Summit Slml $8.531.22 Metal 7642 Sunset Ford $758.09 Truck Pads 7643 Supokc Inc $109.70 Lab Supplies 7644 Super Chem Corporation $1.209.55 Chemicals 7645 John W.Swindler $3,422.83 Expense Relmb. 7646 Tekmar Company $263.20 Cable 7647 The ran Bender $224.34 A/C Duct work 7648 Theodore Robbins Ford $301.11 Vehicle Rental 7649 Thermo Jarrell Ash Corp. $10,800.00 Service Agreement 7650 Think Earth Environmental Education Foundation $7.000.00 Membership 7651 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. $330.79 Mechanical Pads 7652 Tony's Lock 8 Safe Service $13B.01 Locks 8 Keys 7653 Aemkmd Flnanciagrop Hat Productions $241,09 Directors Meeting Expense County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 10129W Check No. Vendor Amount Description 7654 Toshiba International Corporation $160.77 Instrument Parts 7655 TmPial Plaza Nursery,Inc. $3,735.00 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11.94 7656 Truck and Auto Supply,Inc. $49.16 Truck Parts 7657 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. $310.00 Lab Services 7658 Tustin Dodge $296.03 Truck Parts 7659 Ullm Scientific 565.00 Lab Supplies 7660 Unitce Consulting Engineers $20,000.00 Professional Services 7661 Union Bank of Cal.GoVI.Services 52,970.91 Account Analysis 7662 The Unisource Corporation S9,0BB.02 Office Supplies 7663 United Parcel Service $538.44 Parcel Services 7664 United Stales Filter Corp. $1,262.75 Lab Supplies 7665 Valley Cities Supply Company $3,387.29 Plumbing Supplies 7666 Van Waters B Rogers Inc. $1.551.60 Chemicals 7667 Voxon Corp.and David Medellin $1,922.05 Employee Computer Loan Program 7668 VWR Sclenlific Products $9,865.16 Lab Supplies 7669 The Wackenhut Corporation $11,901.12 Contract Service-Security Guards 7670 The Wall Street Journal $322.17 Subscription 7671 Waste Markets $9,325.42 Residuals Removal MO 3-27-96 7672 Water Education Foundation $35.32 Subscription 7673 Water Environment Federation $1i Seminar Registration 7674 Waterman Supply Co.,Inc $431.D0 Chain 7675 Western Business Systems $528.63 Payroll Check Stock 7676 Western Extedor's Inc. 52,150.00 Construction-Stucco HR Building 7677 Western Health Services $4.770.00 Professional Servces 7678 Western Industrial Supply $811.98 Tool Boxes 7679 Wilmington Instrument Co.,Inc $143.38 Equipment Repair 7680 Woodward-Clyde Consultants $1.857.50 Professional Services 7581 WW Grainger Inc. $991.86 Compressor Pads 7662 Xerox Corporation $9.870.33 Copier Leases 7683 Zymark Corporation $7,000.00 Lab Equipment 7684 Jose C.Ambriz $399,45 Expense Reimb. 7685 Layne T.Baroldi $163.90 Expense Reimb. 7686 Michael A.Sardis $2,161.94 Employee Computer Loan Program 7667 Howard P.Lembke,Jr $1.320.84 Expense Reimb. 7698 Raymond Navarro $132.75 Expense Reimb. 7689 Fred J.O'Brien 51,040.27 Expense Reimb. 7690 County of Orange $3,225.00 Administrative Fees 7691 County Sanitation District of $1.142.65 Petty Cash Reimb. 7692 Donna Anderson,Larry Anderson $190,000.00 Newport Spill Claim Settlement MO 8-27-97 7693 CWEA $170.00 Conference Registration 7694 Kemimn Pacific,Inc. $2.231.27 Feoic Chloride MO 9.27-95 7695 Roland T.McReynolds $578.57 Expense Reimb. 7696 Santa Fe Bag Co.,Inc. S84o.45 Polypropylene Bags 7697 Schwing America,Inc. $61.71 Pump Paris 7698 Sejal Patel $203.67 Expense Reimb. Total Claims Paid 1029/97 $4.291.640.17 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County ' Claims Paid 10/29/97 Summary Amount District No. 1 $780.43 District No.2 $1,740.59 District No.3 $7,571.73 District No.5 $197,299.00 District No.11 $397.26 CORF $2.250,775.95 Self Insurance Funds $31128DA2 Joint Operations $1,511,814AB $4,291,640.17 5 County Sanitation Districts r of Orange County,California P. O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, November 19, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, November 19, 1997, at the Districts' Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: OTHERS PRESENT: PRESENT: Terry Andrus,Counsel John J.Collins,Joint Chair Ryal Wheeler,Midway City Homeowner and Peer A. Swan,Vice Joint Chair CSDOC staff member George Brown,Chair,FAHR Burnie Dunlap,Chair,PDC STAFF PRESENT: Pat McGuigan,Chair,OMITS Donald F.McIntyre,General Manager Bill Steiner,Director/Supervisor Michelle Tuchman,Director of Communications Terri Josway, Safety and Emergency Response Manager ABSENT: Dan Tunnicliff,Emergency Response Supervisor Larry Kraemer,Senior Engineer Greg Mathews, Principal Adminsbative Analyst Nick Amontes,Collection and Plant Facilities Maintenance Manager Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ryal Wheeler, Midway City homeowner and CSDOC employee, addressed the Steering Committee on five issues: 1) Tour Guide Program. Mr. Wheeler complimented those who put the program in place. As a participant in this program, he had the opportunity to give his first tour this week and it was very rewarding; 2) Proposed Softball Diamond. Mr. Wheeler expressed his thanks to the Steering Committee for considering this facility. He said that this will benefit many of the employees; 3) Renaming the Districts. Mr. Wheeler expressed concem about changing the name of the Districts and hoped that any name change would be representative of this fine Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 November 19, 1997 agency; 4) Dedication of the CNG Station. Mr. Wheeler requested that Midway City officials and homeowners associations receive invitations to this event, and 5) Mr. Wheeler expressed concerned with the RAC/PAC democratic process because of the lack of elected officials on the committees. As a Midway City resident, he does not know who to go to to voice concerns regarding these committees. Any recommendations from these committees can go through the governing board before decisions are made. Joint Chairman Collins thanked Mr. Wheeler for his comments and pointed out that the committees were advisory committees only. The Joint Boards of Directors will be accountable for any actions. These committees were established as part of the Districts' outreach program. RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION: Receive, file and approve draft minutes of the October 22, 1997 Steering Committee meeting. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager asked to defer his report to later in the meeting. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Counsel did not make a report. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-5) General Manager Don McIntyre asked that the order of the discussion items be changed to accommodate the group making the presentation on High Flow Emergency Preparations. There was no objection by the Committee members. 3. High Flow Emergency Preparation Review Mr. McIntyre reported that staff has done a good job in preparing this program and he requested direction from the Steering Committee on whether to make the same presentation to the full Boards. Staff members Terri Josway, Dan Tunnicliff, Larry Kraemer and Nick Amontes reported on the all-day high Flow emergency preparations table-top exercise that was held last week. The goal was to maximize efforts during high flow conditions through a simulated storm event. 1 Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 November 19, 1997 The exercise took eight hours and involved forty staff members. It tested the incident command system and treatment plant and collection facilities response plans. Nick Arhontes reported that the lessons Teamed in the exercise were put into action today in response to a problem in Seal Beach. Larry Kraemer, one of the designers of the exercise, went over the concepts in developing the activation levels and the trigger levels. Michelle Tuchman explained some of the internal and external communication challenges that occurred during the exercise. The review of the exercise determined that additional equipment and supplies are required for the Command Center, and there is a need to work out how to get information into the Command Center from the field. Chairman Collins thanked staff for the presentation, and recommended that a presentation be made to the OMTS Committee at their December meeting. During the OMTS Committee report to the Joint Boards a brief(3-4 minutes) presentation may be requested. The Steering Committee members approved the recommendation. 1. Report on EMT Retreat Don McIntyre reported on the Executive Management Team's retreat, which was held last month. The emphasis was on delegating decision-making downward through the organization and performance based evaluations. The members received a copy of the Consensus statement developed after the retreat, which will be distributed to all employees. The facilitator, Dr. David Libert, has been asked to continue to work with the EMT and has asked to interview each member of the Steering Committee. Action Rem: Jean Tappan will provide PDC Committee members concems developed by Frank Dryden to Dr. Libert and will schedule these interviews. 2. MGD Calculations At the request of the FAHR Committee, Greg Mathews reported on changes to the allocation formula for determining the MGD calculation. Greg mentioned that the model will continue to be revised as more and better information is received. The benchmarks have not changed. Staff is to continue to evaluate other agencies benchmarks in an effort to compare our agency with others in the same industry. Action Item: Greg Mathews is to prepare report applying the revised cost allocations for the past five years and report back to the December FAHR and Steering Committees. Director McGuigan also asked that high Flows be considered in the report. 4. Report on Labor/Management Committee Don McIntyre reported that, in an effort to work more effectively with employees, the union representatives have suggested that a Labor/Management Committee be formed. The objective is constructive; they are concerned about working with the DART recommendations that could potentially lead to meet-and-confer issues. Chairman Collins will meet with that Committee on December 15. Don will report to the Steering Committee on these meetings. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 November 19, 1997 ' Director Steiner reported on the progress the County of Orange in changing to a performance-based pay system. At this time five units representing 11,000 employees have agreed to the new system. In order to get buy in, the County offered a 2% non-base building bonus to all employees. 5. The Committee reviewed the agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Committees in December. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY The General Manager reported that a letter was received from SAWPA requesting that the payment of late penalties, amounting to $117,762.78 be waived. It was moved, seconded and passed to add this discussion to the agenda. A meeting was held November 3 with representatives of the SAWPA Board. They delivered a check in the amount of$209,104 for payment towards the 10th mgd of capacity, and at that time they requested that the late payment charge of$117,762.78 be waived, and the also requested a seat on the Boards of Directors. Chairman Collins had persuaded them to hold off on that request until after our consolidation. These actions will require Board action. Counsel reported that the Directors could waive these charges. Action: Staff to prepare an agenda report re the SAWPA request for the next FAHR Committee. Director McGuigan had several questions on the vehicle reduction report, which staff answered. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Chairman Collins stated that the minutes from the last meeting indicated that the subject of renaming the Districts would be discussed at this meeting. Don McIntyre said that this issue was not ready for this meeting and will be added to the agenda for the December Steering Committee meeting. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT The General Manager reported on OCR activities, and sought direction on how to keep the Board members advised of what is happening. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, reported on the activities of the PR consultant to date. The Notice of Preparation for the EIR will be mailed December 15 to 350 individuals and agencies. The media briefing kits will be included in the Directors' December Board meeting agenda packages. These are for the first phase of the reclamation project, investigating the possibility of the project. Director Swan again expressed concern about managing the consultant. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 November 19, 1997 CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for December 17, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7 p.m. Submitted by: JV Tappan, Steering C mmiltee Secretary K�.n.eu�e.e•�nwc coe,�arreesnxor+++aer.m.ax STEERING COMMITTEE ""°"'o"` r°"Raft' 11/1]/9] 17J1]/9] AGENDA REPORT IOem NumEe IgpNu County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California //(V/ FROM: Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager Originator: Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services SUBJECT: WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION (WEF) IN SINGAPORE, ASIA GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve out-of-country travel by Nancy J. Wheatley; 2) Approve payment of registration fee in the amount of$575 for Nancy J. Wheatley for the Water Environment Federation's Technical Conference in Singapore, Asia. SUMMARY Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, has prepared a technical paper that has been accepted for presentation at the March 1998 WEFTEC Asia Conference in Singapore, and has requested that the Districts authorize her attendance at the conference and pay the $575 registration fee. All other expenses will be paid by Ms. Wheatley. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The cost of registration is $575. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Travel) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The Technical Services Department's travel budget for FY 97-98 is $22,100. The remaining balance to date is $12,990. G MpkWNyeMe daft ReVUM1INewW�umeCSWM'Repebebn C¢ Re,,.ea. em,9, Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Ms. Wheatley has had an abstract accepted for the Water Environment Federation's Asia Singapore March 1998 Conference. She has been asked to present her technical paper that is entitled, "Is There a Future for Reuse of Biosolids at any Price?" The Conference is a new WEF initiative to increase opportunities for professionals from around the world to share wastewater technical and management strategies with their colleagues. The registration fee of$575 includes the full conference and exhibition. The advance registration price deadline is February 5, 1998. Ms. Wheatley, who will be using 36 hours of regular time to attend the meeting, will pay all other expenses. ALTERNATIVES The alternative is for the Districts not to fund the registration fee. The conference represents a new opportunity for a senior Districts' staff member to learn how other countries address many wastewater technical and management issues. In addition, this new perspective comes at a time when we are engaged in a significant strategic planning process and could generate innovative approaches for the Districts. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Steering Committee: 1. Copy of the partial program announcement Joint Boards: 1. Copy of the partial program announcement NJW:ahh:jt O YtlpbWNpM C��FK�/d�M LmmE�W1N IiNwbn We NMW IMM Page 2 " Presentetl Dy Cosponsored by r �0Ftfl erat 11IIIC11� �v�wwww..e .«' Environmental Engfneenng Society of Singapore WEF.T.EC® ' -- a OMIA ✓ 1' I " IUCA-V, U t D DR OR - a s a. � • � . Ct s .w+� - �n' a`"r.3'LVu�r-' J ht �Hn'��'4. �e �`;yi� K.�i:.�.. �•,; # ! i y�yy • ��c�fk 4 4.4'1S �,r•;J� * r.'S+P ..=15 , rYy.�_ ! r4.. f� 'S i�'�'.•i x .�" y,.�"Tyf `9� •� 9 yY .����4��4� r�� ,4�`+� 1 1 GFESf ' :kF µtl�' ��r77 �� :. ry�i. C^ n >xr A• �'4y+�ih �a 12•'- f 1 fi. MtP r f A hr `�j, par.�:Jrliuiira ?Y•��i �� � r 0 f�..< Preliminary Technical Program 0mmnninal mi 1k71ablf'Ibnxry;b Rllr llw•.d . •. ' " '. Ugk mI Mk alul uval,lq..lnYxlura .i Facility Operations 8 Collection Systems/Stonnwater J IIOrYI'k Nk/xuxra. . Session 9:Management/ Session]AA:Odor and Corrosion Control Ik+ek'umnu.d a N i,vl W:n'I... the Control of Odors and VOCS All liyalnae.m.d WNnµ s,luxd..l+o lM Ikalnntkm of.sc :rya•R'nv+nngu lluhryi N..... lal hb.hxlo;'Cunuul in¢:omx:ncr tbrnuinn Prima....and Ihdwhilil;.lkm of l:ulit. I liµh'Rnplcmmrc lyndY+i. RcakI,W.,pnnexdng Dianmler 4•xcu..0% Ivi, .11.Aevu/L M.M le-Ira..Y./hird/r ,Ilh lxh'1/l..VrxM J[xlfimv.A1'[N%n,fAYN'b Ukenin in lk iteh'I, Inedcnumlh.p lkµulaunpikkr Slandxnl. Iklufib from tln•Chonncd❑ainµ.dAv\vv MNun(!.O'/hmI•.:Vnn ll AulNn (:oti.al IMUI,,fin Cnu llumu,WXn4nuu. s1wenm br 04,tu and 6.rtu m gnmvl 611"W a FunnI fi. W-ek-dlli.ndkls :uxl lvu'ility Olkrlltn) Al.G.O'/Wen al An,Price? YYxurxrx O.AlnRuu Sl54100 SSB:CattailsNnrN]'/ AY<t.al IWxwlkp;Alic[wM I)..1lrmrt•. Ihvlklkm of(khlu fnxo a M:stx'V Wlp AI/I/x,aerie/luMinvm Cnauvrliun.$:In .µtx Iix'Irti Sia Ike' I Wnµfklnr Fititnrkma Uala:uxl Alr llizln•nkm (hr:m thnfall.San lliayl.lidif nvua Alternate Mulvlinµ toy...k(2910 x./rrrl if Rllllprl%I+I. Senajle Sludge I...i T.1lit 1, FaM I'IIIIIII'/AYI 1Ype•Aunun:A<•m CrruuY,/nY 1\'Ydrc•rgxxw ,GryNN'rl,l Nw-M.M4f/1.iiv Incinenuiml t 1pl in.ipnkn.of R.,le•.111 mvr IN.'i,e hx' Abk/TaAwr/h,Alao ka.,r/krrxkc I ligh l lyrinikvw Sulfitk•IrMdinf. Dihnkui EVithc Galµ+Iiwn lhdmUhc:unl Ib..rlrrx Xv t u,Alp.,'7f th" ' mill ln.llRfuklu7 of Alanln•IliRuzl'n %inub 1lnlnketvurur A Jjil Au'lmiwlllllavit"'Illp'kI1fII-VAI\ix AlyNrtw L JWulmn.!bark/n(:.JlNYNn Alk/x/d/.IN., .1 the Rebumesbo nr I immµem stnllllkk s, Natural Systems and Gxnp maul In Stmagv(kkar a,a SaxvXv Session=C:Flood and Water Treatment '1'rtauncni f-mility Stormwater Management laavlvn'e CC Mu I51'uau tdQmuvllinµ Snarnnyaur Momli;lg Session 13:Rural lMmce Wastewater Treatment rmind llzinR Gm m s al)lk'-In idta in lbnkaux, (kkm fi kke.lit., 7k.Grrk'lu..v(d/A.1kdiftAu.C.A,,,-1Pvc1mviiting Sand lilun:M.Innomthv Aiv Slumawlter Al:nn rnuvn inalkxn Clmmp' Appnmch to Small Oinmunity Waacmiter I,we Caq CamalMriz.m of lde4ml li/wec Air 4i 'fieutment N.6 Vuipyinµ uml,(Iax l'I..M'ii\Wet,Cedxul (Yted"A At bamelf lkwglou U?Ikrlvls and GamW C.Gxterkm A,W,uhm Ikncftcial lhvra•of Nut lhdnl Smmc It....AT Reite'dF..V"Ve In7w At e..la.Abk A/tun in Samna Mudta ,lrWMAd VHMLVII.Aul(xup•AwAt..f/nnvr GNNar IhmmMic nlul lnA101rkA Ulwewak75)stcnM (kler Cmmd Oar 114exy:(AY'ifli\cnnl, (,it Ruml Araar,in Nrn ya-.alaml %Wuegitnl h.hlk Ulnkz l)IJUMIx+u We,Alukh'OInMbe•OInmlknb'.(a I)III1 JV.Ikn(8tn"J.11C.C.1u;DJ..Stamm L A.JIduu uN.Wit,1-/o.1/olu, In-Unc lbeed guiraWS)stoe ( ' On.11i'v. /iffn9.1).. Vtonui,ekimirl.GMrald•/. J.Ibrdr&A1d Ihlf'Andrwr.NMI Akrcu(r./aNxvv IVIUMN)nh Impnadng the Inn tument Perfmn:mce Ill LnhuR lknls in W-bpit by Conw sting to Prime i Facility Management Algdkadnn ur Wnnv vcnillmal Ilen W,IMrtitier 7rtatment Symclm O-' NI;u.Wmenl Ih:xtkax f N urban Runldf J/rmu*Sit!A'erY(Illkrfa Nminn! and Financing r Cnuml:A U:xlldnµuu.D.C.'H.Iteriena rnn ih,,M VYh. ,At,%.tiv/Yams IHkumMalinaluxlinn da Wiml-havnntl Session 10A:Financing and Privatization lulpxm Acr Manawelcnt anti kimineinµ Vxn<lx in Stnalkeel Alternates T WretnugO Omn,C Nuln,D.Ufdle A I:.: Iiww ma lla'I...I'll,'of du•Phillplue" 61,001.4%of the Ilrabulge in Dhaka City lrdmnibag StilhL'I'nxhuli)ll In a lalxmn System Gins Al!/A•r,0,1101,1— We Ak/rA•,Tcnl.rrnl k,14 rl.ERaINN. 17arde;Luls BWaenJrrkuvnue,lays).Mr/AaN 'Ilse Engineer IMnvre Crnutrvtl(Iipc): G,i f/n-Y Wllvur...90,Und/xvg Imp.ned hmd lictimwm Mvhlnduµktr Aplmieck In du lklhvey of Wltcraml Srkukmuf Sttpn Drainage SyMet Pnxlum lfigher Quality lBRumt it Muds)Cost %%moaner IMlµ•Mx in Ado anti l'Avu anus or Sto mxater /nu ll.Lea;Gkn T Llot(t(vr,fbd ca 11..dky (d7 q•IY,µnu.171rix Wldmrs,Alnnkr ,SM.1nnu(wr a.. .Val!/Inrh Nkherd U'Yrrnvl 3. ruarrl GAtl:mth—Oiryxmunitkr and Gnuuainl.r tegxnaniiax f u 1'ri\aiintion in the Gee,Whitt-.Al ink.IMlhundl Rommun,%of S,nall Water sell hitter BiOsollds&Residuals I'lililict iu tau l:x:ifn'Relen Millla�elllefll A Cue IliOery fm Got l9f tint, K(a\IIMtInT 111......In'.IlrUxe,naa{I pdw lNxA•,/vrm Aln,.vxA/Irian/IIWky Session 32: Managing liminamu+n:d Rx'"mitn. Muh7nyidr wde.d4.u71ulknul7iansmri.m Residuals and Biosolids l:.h.1.ArOhl NLIr. MAU....E Ala;rde. mlalrRy in Ibr Rimy tuna sling Hmta7 Savuu: A.u�tiuy:Ntvlu,lhtcnnining knefia Ilkndaln- ASuslainaldc Ra:tune MdunO Wiv.rnhv.'firnnrc'c G. IYnb mxl xtY Onn'cplz for Meeten,/ IJI.W4141nz Ill.-,Akdduwe Alternates .u'I lnim Mnumo IkvAnlwaxvn of Nahum 06,10im., Sample,.ml Mcicte,lhrmxolz liar Italxryn7l I Ivaun i.lun•fla• Iix lhv lklu-14 al lturd lk.ndklz ....I M+vu Mlonux.Rolenknl rtrtWnlle Session 1.OB:Compatition and Efficiency Mru V.VG , of Av.;nt+l lalinm MAkix aim uu.x{;nq:I'nr:ne 4+'lur Suhla.ln kN Ikavhiluy Study of Alex uhuml Ayldir;nxx; 0.1-Lw% MNev;pdurxl.mv a:mrx:nn ❑ulnuw .117" mnl fthwul\hel;nx hum 'Itrmnn+n Sym•uo flu RNn.$M'vau ail/kun l:nlgdd Ixna/;MA MrrmP dean AI lit mun'rrlpu.SWnr/vm Ihvna Fa 14 .rr/(Ahmvl knl AYxd/n7Nkl '11x-Uv'•A a'nLaxl.anhin ln•.1n:m+I Al.nmru:nx.'M...maret7n x.I.•Iimalxvin'P At a noon... Ixr mXn fiJ.nl:nnq;Ilia..A.h 1 ry:A N:fd.'x:niy li.'a.alxlll Slaaltl'aPf •unq.h.Alanpnvurn Yixdz Lxnhu.Xn la.xlAaAr:nnm I G...1"".r Y 11 nl' aruulAl p A'rar lhnrJx7 N Nxmuq kupnmut;llu• ....nlxnur•A hnhnu•uc;'u AI.......urvnt an❑.vv.unur lbr lo-u Nlra.'x•:nn'hr..auar°t I'luwu M.n..n;•+n.r,a\u:no:Yl... hulnanal it.'z..I..:llu IMU•rrl lSrnl/Lutror Irurr.11 Il brrnr/xr County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California r, P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY. DECEMBER 3. 1997 -5,30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on December 3, 1997, at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present: Staff Present: James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager John Collins, Joint Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Maintenance Steve Anderson Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Admin. Dave Sullivan Chris Dahl, Director of Information Technology Charies E. Sylvia Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Hank Wades Mike Moore, ECM Manager Mark Esquer, O&M Process Support Manager Absent: Tony Valenzuela, Electrical Engineer Larry Kraemer, Sr. Engineer Pat McGuigan, Chair Pat Magnante, Committee Secretary Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Terri Josway, Safety& Enter. Response Manager Margie L. Rice Dan Tunnicliff, Engineer Chris Norby Nick Arhontes, Collections Manager John E. Noyes George Robertson, Supervisor, Ocean Monitoring Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialist Others Present: Representatives from: Black&Veatch (Rick Running) Tule Ranch (1) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM James M. Ferryman was appointed Chair Pro Tem. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee r Page 2 December 3, 1997 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the November 5, 1997 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE VICE CHAIR No report was given. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER No report was given. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Robert Dolan, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reported on the following items: • Current financial information for the month of October was handed out for the Director's review. This information was not available at the time the agenda packages were mailed out. • Natural gas pricing is going down and is now at$2.36. We will continue to pay our contract price of$2.80 through February 1998. The December cost for having a fixed contract is about $13,000. We saved $16,200 for the month of November. Hence, we are slightly ahead. • A meeting was held with Southern California Edison to discuss improving their system reliability. O&M Monthly Report Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report: A report for the month of October is submitted to the OMTS Committee for review. This report focuses on compliance, safety, financial data and performance measures for O & M and is intended to provide Committee members with information on a timely basis. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance „ and Technical Services Committee Page 3 December 3, 1997 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, reported on the following Items: • Follow-up story to a newspaper report in the Orange County edition of the L . A. Times regarding the California Public Interest Research Group's (CALPIRG) report entitled, "California In Polluted Paradise". There were two sources of information for this article: 1) EPA discharge permit data and 2)the inventory filed by Industries for the amount of toxic chemicals discharged into the sewer system. Two assumptions were made from this information that were incorrect. Nancy was interviewed on OCN and had the opportunity to mention our Source Control award and clarify the report's inaccuracies. A tape of the interview will be received. • Upcoming meetings-The Long Beach Chapter of the Surfrider's Group will meet here tomorrow night at 7 PM in the Board Room to discuss what we know about the ocean and the draft permit. The Director's are invited to attend. There will be a meeting on Friday at 9:00 a.m. with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) at the Orange County Water District to discuss what we have learned from our water monitoring. Nancy will meet with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in San Francisco on Thursday to plead for 25,000 metric tons of solids instead of 20,000. The draft permit is still expected to be received on December 18, 1997. • Air Issue -At the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Board meeting on December 12, 1997 a recommendation will be made to oppose the proposal to allow, from the time a permit to construct is issued and a permit to operate is issued, changes being made to the agreed upon control technologies. A Resolution from the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts was read and will be presented at the Board meeting. Director Wedaa provided additional information regarding Regulation 12 hearings In Long Beach and other air issues. He offered to review Nancy's materials and investigate the issue but does not think it is a problem. • The General Manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is supportive of reclaimed water and will be supportive of the OCR/GRS project. • EPA's Beach Program is being promoted to determine when beaches will be open or closed. The program will not affect us very much. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, reported on the followed items: • We saw no significant increase in flows during last weekend's storm (11/29-11/30). The cities are complying with our request not to lift manholes. We received a request today from Newport for additional stoppers. • Leasing of unused land -A four acre parcel of land at Plant No. 1 and the north 40 at Plant No. 2. Two Proposals were solicited- one from a private developer for a golf course and the other was for nursery (Village Nursery). We are in process of talking with Village Nursery regarding a ten year lease. This item will come before the Committee in February. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee / Page 4 December 3, 1997 • 800 MHZ Tower at Plant No. 2 -The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)want to get a lot of traffic off the lower level bands and want to push government agencies into the 800 range. The County has estimated our cost to $1.8 million dollars. The FCC asked if they could erect a tower on our facility. The City and the homeowners had no objections. As a part of this deal, the lease site would be offered at no lease fee for 20 years (with a two-year notice exit clause) in exchange for CSDOC's full access to 800 MHZ at no charge. The FCC has agreed to our terms. • Mineral Rights at Plant No. 2-We are in the early stages of negotiation with West Newport Oil's new operator, Armstrong Petroleum, for horizontal drilling 500 feet and below. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY No report was given. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. DISCUSSION ITEMISI 1. OMTS97-027 OUT-SOURCING OF COLLECTION SYSTEM ROUTINE LINE CLEANING IN DISTRICT 7. Motion: Information only. 2. OMTS97-028 PIMA GRO AGREEMENT RE: HEAVY VEHICLE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. Mo iom Moved, seconded and carried to authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Pima Gro for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in a form approved by General Counsel. 3. OMTS97-029 SCAQMD AGREEMENT RE: HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. Motion7 Moved, seconded and carried to authorize staff to enter into an amended agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District for a heavy- duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in a form approved by General Counsel. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 ' December 3, 1997 4. OMTS97-030 OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM (PHASE ll) REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. Motion: Information only. 5. OMTS97-031 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT. Motion: Information only. 6. OMTS97-032 HIGH FLOW EMERGENCY-TABLETOP EXERCISE . Motion: Information only. 7. OMTS97-033 CENTRAL GENERATION AND ENERGY OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT. Motion: Information only. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY No other business. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for March 4, 1997 at the Districts'Administrative Offices. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 6 December 3, 1997 r ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Submitted by: Patricia J. Magna Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary H1WP.DTA\0M1910WAGNANTE0MTS C-11DEC971MIN 1297.WPD DMTS COMMITTEENeeereoare 31/3/97 AGENDA REPORT // C tem Number County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration Prepared by: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration SUBJECT: PIMA GRO AGREEMENT RE: HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Pima Gro for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY In September 1995, the Districts received confirmation that our proposal to do a heavy-duty demonstration project using monies supplied by the SCAQMD was going to be approved. In December 1995,the SCAQMD Board of Directors met and approved the project. The Directors will recall that the project is a public-private partnership between the Districts, the SCAQMD, the Southern California Gas Company, Pima Gro, Battelle and PSA. To date, the Directors have authorized staff to enter into contracts with all of these partners. Last month, as part of his report, Ed Hodges informed the OMTS Committee that the Districts had successfully come to final term with Pima Gro, one or our biosolids haulers, who has agreed to convert five of their vehicles to burn Compressed Natural Gas. As part of this agreement, Pima Gro has agreed to allow the Districts to have full rights to all mobile source emissions reduction credits (MSERC's)generated by this project from any local air quality agency, including, but not limited to, the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the San Joaquin Valley United Air Quality Management District. Staff believes that these credits could be worth as much as $135.000 in year one. The value of these credits in subsequent years is unknown at this time. However, it is staffs understanding that these credits could be worth less in subsequent years. The contract between the Districts and Pima Gro has been reviewed by our General Counsel and includes all of their suggested modifications. (Please see attached contract). Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will give a brief presentation on this item. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY There is no budgetary impact. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) H1w dtay52p41 96S*WSNGENMI.5M1 E 6 Pagel ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS Agreement for Implementation of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Project EEH: fw H wy meyza�10�v\GM GENDAW9 fEe1 Page ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA October 2, 1997 Phone: (7161962-2411 Gary Bruggeman amaWM aka: Pima Gro Systems, Inc. Faa��vW , M 631 New Jersey 927268127 Redlands, CA 92373 eareet add.: 1R® Subject: Alternative Fuel— Heavy Duty Truck Demonstration 9970 7019 SCAQMD Contract No. —96066 CSDOC Project No. P1-51 rdntt".p AgesPB Enclosed for our review and information, lease find the finalized 'Agreement 0 Y P 9 Cities for Implementation of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Project" agreement. AnBheen Please review it in its entirety. Should you have any questions or concerns, 9aena pwe please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 962-2411, extension 3005. (apneas Fnuaein vaney Rdwmn KMWVWn attach h ne J / Le palma A tutas ([,8tua., Jiw-/_,'Ar(rt7/•'e�' Newport Beech Orenge PntaeA. sam Beaach Edwin E. Hodges Sbema Director of General Services Administration Tustin tero pent - - . ttvba Lille Country ar Gretrya EEH: fw H:Pap.dtalgsa12416NDtlgesNLT-FUELWIMA-GR01ENggetnan final agMLd= San" n®t.,"a Enclosure Caere Mesa Garden Grove Mill aNt y Gay watae Matricts aline Ranch 4 P.D&2 lNaaleneter and 4tt,g CDmmated[c p Maa,� the Environment Sme 1954 AGREEMENT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS (CNG) PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into to be effective this 24th day of July, 1997 by and between: County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, hereinafter referred to as "CSDOC", and Pima Gro Systems, Inc., an Arizona corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Pima Gro". RECITALS WHEREAS, CSDOC has been awarded Contract No. 96066 by the South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD") for a compressed natural gas ("CNG") Project; and WHEREAS, CSDOC contracts with Pima Gro for the transportation of municipal biosolids by Pima Gro trucks from CSDOC's Fountain Valley and/or Huntington Beach treatment plants ("CSDOC Facility") to destinations in Kern County, Imperial County, Riverside County, and/or Yuma, Arizona ("Approved Site(s)"), and WHEREAS, Pima Gro's participation in the demonstration project was a material consideration for CSDOC's application for, and SCAQMD's approval of, Contract No. 96066. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Pima Gro shall: a. Deliver eight (8) GMC trucks from its fleet to Power Systems Associates ("PSA") facilities in Whittier, California, for installation by PSA. Five (5) of these vehicles shall install Caterpillar 3176B Dual- Fuel Engines, and Three (3) of these vehicles shall install Caterpillar 3176 diesel engines; b. Use said trucks to transport CSDOC's biosolids from CSDOC Facility to Approved Site(s). C. Use three (3) control trucks operating on standard 3176 diesel engines to transport biosolids from CSDOC Facility to Approved Site(s). The control trucks shall be identically, or nearly identically, configured to the five (5) trucks in which Caterpillar 3176E duel-fuel engines have been installed. d. Ensure that the control trucks make approximately the same round- trip to and from Approved Site(s) on similar routes as the demonstration trucks, with similar loads, in order to permit an accurate comparison of the operating data. e. Cooperate and coordinate with all parties to the MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING among CSDOC, Pima Gro, Southern California Gas Company, PSA and Battelle concerning this CNG Project. f. Have the right to, and agree to, obtain fuel at CSDOC's CNG fueling station in the performance of this Agreement when said fueling station becomes operative. g. Have the right to transport biosolids from CSDOC's Facility in the amounts and on the terms and conditions as set forth in present CSDOC Agreement with Pima Gro, OMTS96-024 dated November 20, 1996. h. Pay the sum of$101,150.00 directly to CSDOC within 30 days of written demand by CSDOC. i. Allow CSDOC to have full rights to all, if any, mobile source emission reduction credits (MSERCs) generated by this project from any local air quality agency, including, but not limited to, the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the San Joaquin Valley United Air Quality Management District. j. Assign and transfer to the Districts any MSERCs generated by this project, and shall provide in a timely manner, all necessary input and signatures for any applications required to obtain these MSERCs. 2. CSDOC shall: a. Permit Pima Gro to fuel its trucks at the CNG fueling station once said station becomes operative. b. Permit Pima Gro to transport biosolids from CSDOC's Facility in furtherance of Section 1.g above. 3. This Agreement shall be effective upon approval of the CSDOC's Joint Board of Directors and shall expire on March 31, 2002. 4. General Provisions. a. This Agreement, including the rights and duties contained herein, shall not be assigned in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of each of the parties hereto. b. This Agreement is not intended to create or evidence any partnership, joint venture or similar relationship of any kind. C. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. d. This Agreement is binding and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their representatives, successors and permitted assigns. e. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the matters covered herein and supersedes all previous agreements and understandings, oral or written, expressed or implied, with respect thereto. f. This Agreement may not be modified or amended except by a written agreement executed by each of the parties. g. Each party shall indemnify and save harmless the other party, and As directors, officers, agents and employees from any and all losses, liability, damages, claims, suits, actions and administrative proceedings, and demands relating to acts or omissions of the indemnitor, its directors, officers, agents or employees, arising out of or related to the performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement or any other acts or omissions of the indemnitor, its directors, officers, agents or employees. Neither party assumes liability for the acts or omissions of persons other than each party's respective directors, officers, agents or employees. County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange Pima Gro Systems, Inc., an County, California for itself and Arizona , corporation on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 By: Its: Chair, Board of Directors By: Dated: o /9 . 1997 Penny Kyle, Board Secretary Dated: 1 1997 Approved as to form: THOMAS L WOODRUFF DISTRICT COUNSEL By: Dated: 1997 H:1W P.DTAIGSAVA10 W ODGESNLT-FUELWI MA-GRO=NTRACT.MST OMTS COMMITTEE 4meeing Dace97 AGENDA REPORT �� NumberobiCounty Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Callfomia FROM: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration Prepared by: Edwin E. Hodges, Director General Services Administration SUBJECT: SCAQMD AGREEMENT RE: HEAVY DUTY VEHICLE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize staff to enter into an amended agreement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District for a heavy-duty vehicle demonstration project at no cost to the Districts, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY In September 1995, the Districts received confirmation that our proposal to do a heavy- duty demonstration project, using monies supplied by the SCAQMD, was going to be approved. In December 1995, the SCAQMD Board of Directors met and approved the project. At the February 7, 1996 OMTS Committee meeting staff received direction from the Committee to enter into a contract with the SCAQMD for the project. As part of the original agreement, the SCAQMD was to give the Districts $447,000. This money was to be paid out as follows: $192,700 for%the cost of 10 engines to burn CNG, $105,000 for installation and certification of the new engines, $99,962 to cover the cost of testing and reporting, and $49,338 to help defray the cost of the CNG compressor to be installed on the Districts site. A few months ago, Pima Gro informed the Districts that they could only convert 5 engines instead of the 10 as originally envisioned. Additionally, the engine installer (Power Systems Associates) has experienced some unforeseen project costs. In July, staff met with representatives of the SCAQMD to discuss a possible change in the project scope and an adjustment to the total contract price. Attached is a copy of the contract amendment that we received from the SCAQMD. Under the terms of this new agreement the SCAQMD had agreed to decrease the scope from 10 engines to 5 engines and to reduce the total contract amount from $447,000 to $394,813. The following are our calculations of this re-scoping effort and the reduction in the SCAQMD grant: 1. SCAQMD Contribution toward the Installation of five (5) dual fuel engines $ 96,250.00 2. Additional changes per PSA attached letter dated July 17, 1997 A. Muffler relocation - $10,000.00 B. Shielding - 8,500.00 C. Bracket design - 1,500.00 D. CNG tanks - 7,200.00 E. Additional labor - 21,400.00 SUBTOTAL $ 48,600.00 3. Project Contingency 20,000.00 SUBTOTAL $164,850.00 4. CSDOC Contribution (24,999.00) SUBTOTAL $139,851.00 5. Original Engine Re-powering Costs $192,700.00 TOTAL PROJECT DECREASE $(52.849.00) Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, will give a brief presentation on this item. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY There is no budgetary impact. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS South Coast Air Quality Management District Amendment to Contract Contract No. 960661 EEH: fw e\xy.MM sW410VW ef10WSVGENDA195M1 F2 UM Revised: 10/17/97 Page 2 South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 (9D9) 396-20DO • http://w .agmd.gov October 22, 1997 Mr. Edwin E. Hodges Director of General Services Administration County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 RE: CONTRACT AMENDMENT NUMBER 960661 Dear Mr. Hodges: Enclosed are two originals of the above-mentioned Contract Amendment for the project entitled, Demonstrate Natural Gas Engines in Heavy-Duty Trucks. This Amendment extends the Contract term from May 2, 1999 through July 15, 1999, reduces the Contract amount to $394,813, and includes Attachments 1A - Statement of Work and 2 - Payment Schedule. Please sign and return both originals to me via Federal Express at your earliest convenience. Upon full execution, one original will be forwarded to you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via telephone or facsimile at (909) 396-3259 or (909) 396-3252, respectively. Sincerely, Michelle A. White Contracts Unit Technology Advancement :mw FEDERAL EXPRESS MP002CONTRU11-7 * 1997 YEARS OF PROGRESS TOWARD CLEAN AIR SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT Contract No. 960661 This Amendment consists of four pages. 1. RECITALS A. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (hereinafter"DISTRICT') and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR") have previously executed a Contract No. 96066 to cosponsor demonstrations of natural gas engines in heavy-duty trucks. B. The trucks used in this project are operated by Pimo Gm Systems, Inc. which transported municipal biosolids from Fountain Valley to Kern County. CONTRACTOR has reduced the number of loads to be transported, therefore, reducing the number of trucks required to transport the biosolids. As a result of the use of fewer trucks, the funding for this project will be reduced. In addition, the demonstration vehicles required a number of modifications to Improve the safely and integrity of the CNG tanks and fueling system. Also, due to delays in the contract bid and award process, additional time is needed for this project. Therefore, a modification to this Contract is necessary to extend the date by which performance must be complete, decrease the maximum compensation payable, and modify the work under this Contract. 2. MODIFICATION -The parties therefore agree to modify the existing Contract, at a decrease in cost to DISTRICT, as follows: A. The term of this Contract is extended for an additional period commencing May 2, 1999 and terminating July 15, 1999. B. Compensation for performance under this Contract is decreased by Fifty-Two Thousand One Hundred Eighty- Seven Dollars($52,187). The total amount payable by DISTRICT for performance under this Contract shall not exceed Three Hundred Ninety-Four Thousand Eight Hundred Thirteen Dollars ($394,813). C. Attachment to- Statement of Work, attached hereto and included herein by this reference, includes deletions and additions to the Statement of Work in Contract 96066. D. Attachment 2 - Payment Schedule, attached hereto and included herein by this reference, supersedes the Milestones In Contract 96066. E. All other provisions of the above-referenced Contract shall remain in full force and effect. SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY By: By: Dr. William A. Burke, Chairman of the Board Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Greenwald, General Counsel 0 w�-t'r.-...��By: c. 4 v ATTACHMENT IA STATEMENT OF WORK FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY The Parties to this Contract agree to the following changes. Deletions shall be sifiekea-euE and additions underlined. Task 1 Memorandum of Understanding CONTRACTOR shall develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between CONTRACTOR, SCG, Pima Gro Systems, Inc. (Pima Gro), and Power Systems Associates (PSA). The MOU shall detail the responsibilities of each party, including the specific trucks to be repowered, the engines and fuel systems to be installed, and the disposition of the 3176 and 3176E engines at the end of the demonstration. CONTRACTOR shall provide DISTRICT with a copy of the fully-executed MOU. CONTRACTOR shall amend the MOU to reflect any changes in scope funding or timing of this proiect. CONTRACTOR shall provide DISTRICT with a fully executed copy of any such MOU amendment. Task 2 Engines and Vehicles 2.1 CONTRACTOR shall coordinate delivery of ten five GMC trucks to PSA facilities in the Basin for installation of Caterpillar 3176E dual-fuel engines in ten each trucks, along with on- board fuel storage and delivery systems. 2.2 through 2.4 remain unchanged. Task 3 Refueling Facility Establishment - remains unchanged. Task 4 Field Test and Data Collection 4.1 through 4.3 remain unchanged. 4.4 CONTRACTOR shall collect operational and maintenance data on each of the ten five CNG trucks and the three diesel control vehicles. This data shall include, but not be limited to, mileage accumulated, driving cycle characteristics, fuel consumption (including information on percentage or ratio of CNG and diesel use under actual vehicle operating conditions), driver and service personnel reaction to operation and maintenance of the vehicles and engines, and a record of repairs and maintenance performed. Task 5 Emissions Testing - remains unchanged. cu079:.15 1 DELIVERABLES v In addition to the deliverables set forth in the Statement of Work, CONTRACTOR shall deliver the following to DISTRICT under this Contract: 1. Remains unchanged. 2. One copy of the draft final report shall be submitted to DISTRICT'S Program Supervisor, and one copy to DISTRICTS TA Staff Specialist assigned to contracts no later than€ebwary 16,1999 May 15, 1999. This document shall, in conformance with the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250 at seq.) be considered in the public domain. Any trade secret information may be submitted to DISTRICT in a separate report in which the document is identified as containing trade secrets on every page. DISTRICT agrees to treat trade secret information in accordance with its Public Records Act guidelines relating to trade secret information. In this report, CONTRACTOR shall document all test results and provide a discussion of the data and results along with a statistical analysis that either recommends validation or invalidation of the test protocol. Specifically, this report shall contain, but not be limited to, the following: a. through I. remain unchanged. 3. Two copies of the final report, incorporating the comments of DISTRICT, shall be submitted to DISTRICT'S Program Supervisor and one copy shall be submitted to DISTRICTS TA Staff Specialist assigned to contracts no later than PAaFeh 34, 4 998 July 1. 1999. 4. Remains unchanged. wo7s.�1s 2 A4{L��TBNE� ATTACHMENT PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY TASK DUE DATE AMOUNT Project Kick-off Meeting January 16, 1996 Execute Participant MOU (Task 1) March 1, 1996 $15,000 Vehicle Test Plan April 1, 1996 $20,000 Emissions Test Plan (Task 3) May 15, 1996 $20,000 Finish Fueling Facility Construction (Task 3) August 1, 1996 $50,000 Complete Engine Repowering (Task 2) November 1, 1996 $219,,A00 $157,151 Fueling & Vehicle Training November 15, 1996 $12,662 Complete Year One Field Test November 15, 1997 $25,000 Chassis Emissions Testing January 31, 1998 $25,000 Vehicle Field Test (Task 4) December 1, 1998 $25,000 Draft Final Report February 15,1899 May 15, 1999 $10,000 Final Emissions Report (Task 5) Febwaqf 15, 1999 May 15, 1999 $10,000 Final Report April 1, 1999 July 1, 1999 2$ 5,000 Total Project Amount $447,G99 $394,813 cum9w 15 3 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California r P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, December 4. 1997 at 5:30 P.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on December 4, 1997, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present, Staff Present: Burnie Dunlap, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Tom Carroll David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Collins, Joint Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Shirley Dettloff, Vice Chair Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Patsy Marshall Gerry Jones, Maintenance Manager Eva Miner-Bradford Christina Shea Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Absent Others Present: Brian Donahue Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Todd Spitzer John Cavanaugh, General Counsel Bob Zemel APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the November 6, 1997 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were approved as drafted, with an abstention from Burnie Dunlap and Shirley Dettloff due to their absence from the November meeting. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. n 9 Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 2 December 4, 1997 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager advised that the Surfriders Association was meeting in the Board Room at 7:00 p.m, and encouraged everyone to attend if the PDC meeting has concluded. The Assistant General Manager also reported that the Districts conducted a table topic exercise with 40 staff members taking part on effects El Nifio might have on the plant. He is confident we are prepared for the large storms predicted. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering reported on the construction management trailers at Plant No. 2 that were damaged in a fire in January 1997, due to an electrical problem. Three bids were received December 3, 1997 for new replacement trailers, with the lowest bid being $184,000. The engineers estimate was$230,000. The insurance company will reimburse the Districts for the cost of the trailers and staff costs. The trailers should be installed by March of 1998. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Tom Woodruff introduced his partner, John Cavanaugh, to the Committee. MONTHLY REPORT ON CHANGE ORDERS Information Only Item. ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 1-5) 1. PDC 97-52: Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site and Security Improvements in the amount of$71,557. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend ratification. 2. PDC97-53: Ratify Change Order No. 11 to Job No. P1-36-2 with Margate Construction, Inc. for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 in the amount of$69,628. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend ratification. a Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 3 December 4, 1997 3. PDC97-54: Approve an increase in authorized funds of$188,000, bringing the project total to $1,208,400 to cover all anticipated costs required to complete construction of the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station, Job No. PI-51-R. DISCUSSION: The Engineering Manager presented an overview of the scope of work, current status of construction work and the details of the requested budget amendment of$188.000. The budget amendment consisted of$170,000 in District staff costs, $5,000 in change orders, $2,000 in soils contracts, $2,000 in survey contract, $4,000 in legal fees, and $5,000 in contingency costs. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. 4. PDC97-50: 1) Approve the plans and specifications for 12 kV Distribution System for Support Facilities, Job No. P1-47, on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2) authorize the General Manager to set January 20, 1997 at 11:00 a.m. for bid opening; and 3) authorize the Board Secretary to publish the Notice Inviting Bids (All Districts). DISCUSSION: The Engineering Department presented a revised, updated report on the project requesting approval of plans and specifications. The PDC Committee asked numerous questions on the project related to project feasibility and justification. The PDC Committee directed staff to develop further options for the project. The project was returned to staff for further evaluation. MOTION: No action was taken on the item. 5. PDC97-55: Recommend to the Board of Directors, approval of Resolution_replacing Resolutions 9043, 94-110, and 95-9 for the purpose of changing procedures and authority levels for approval of construction plans and specifications, procurement of Professional Services Agreements for public works projects, and approval of public works construction agreement change orders. DISCUSSION: The Director of Engineering presented the item and described proposals for change in delegation of authority for each of the following four areas: approval of construction plans and specifications, procurement of Professional Services for small projects, approval of public works construction change orders, and procurement of Professional Services and Addenda to Professional Services Agreements. The Director of Engineering also described the proposed resolution repealing Resolutions 9043, 95-9, and 94-110. Staff recommendation was approved with the following exceptions: a. Professional Services Agreements and Addenda Authority Levels to remain unchanged. b. Change Order approval levels modified to the following: Minutes of the Planning, Design ` and Construction Committee Page 4 December 4, 1997 General Manager: $50,000 max each change order $100,000, or 5% of cumulative change order value, whichever is less PDC Committee: $100,000 max each change order $200,000, or 5% of cumulative change order value, whichever is less Board of Directors: No limits The PDC also required staff to report to the PDC Committee on all construction projects "reasonably expected to exceed"the 5% change order level. c. Changes in the proposed Resolution wording were requested to incorporate the above changes. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval with the noted exceptions. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS, OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 5, 1997. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Submitted by: g✓�r �1 Ca� Gail Cain Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Secretary amv.oamawoorm[c Krt PDC COMMITTEE ja/iglpj nemRy Dace ly9/9] AGENDA REPORT /,?, C" 1 IDam Numbv PDt 7-sz County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineeri Prepared by: Tod Haynes, Supervising E 4giyear SUBJECT: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1 Phase II Site and Security Improvements, Job No. P2-35-3 Conveyor Belt Access at Solids Storage, Job No. SP1995003 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site and Security Improvements in the amount of$71,557.00. SUMMARY Change Order No. 5 includes seven items of added work and two items of deleted work to Job No. J-34-1 and one item of added worn and one item of deleted work to Job No. P2-35-5. There are no errors and omissions items associated with this change order. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $500.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $7,122,693.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 90,983.00 This Change (Add)(Dedust) $ 71,557.00 Change Orders to Date $ 162,540.00 Percentage Increase/Decrease 2.28% Amended Contract Price $7,285,233.00 BUDGETIMPACT This item has been budgeted. (Line item: B(9)d and C(2)a) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) HM dM*ngI NGLL]G-0Ugmda Rep nF-5 dol ReN 1W17W Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. J34-1, Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, consists of improving the reliability of the standby Ocean Outfall Pipeline by construction a new Surge Tower in this line and adding valves to the existing system. Job No. P2-35-5, Phase II Site and Security Improvements consist of miscellaneous site and landscape improvements at Plant No. 2. The plans and specifications for J-34-1 were prepared by Brown and Caldwell Engineers. The construction contract was awarded to Advanco Constructors, Inc. in November 1996. This contract is approximately 80% complete. The following summarizes the Change Order. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE 1 Revise Grating at Surge Tower No. 1 E 8,850 0 Design Change 2 Revise Conduit at Sludge Pump Station $ 44,541 0 Design Change 3 Surge Tower No.2 Stairs $ 15,885 0 Design Change 4 Suige Tower No.2 Vent E 13,503 0 Design Change 5 Miw. Steel Revisions $ 370 0 Design Change 6 Duct Bank Conflicts $ 7,092 0 Changed Conditions 7 Flap Gate Modifications E 13,063 0 Changed Conditions 8 Rothrock Pump Station Backfill $ 3,2D4 0 Design Change 9 Reduced Pile Lengths S 6,000 0 Other 10 Site Modifications E 39,086 0 Design Change 11 Landscaping Modifications E 16.543 0 1 Changed Conditions TOTAL-Change Order No.5 S 71,557 0 All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered of known in the design phase. ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report TH:lh M y..MTR4u 'N .R1.1-5Gm RM. ,a„A, Page 2 F . BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site And Security Improvements Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK (ADOPTED BY AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO CORF) DATE REQUEST FUNDS DATE DATE(%) CONSULTANT $ 237,000.00 $ 227,000.00 $ 227,000.00 $ 117,166.00 52% STAFF $ 738,673.00 $ 738,673.00 $ 738,673.00 $ 414,963.00 56% CONTRACTOR $ 7,405,327.00 $ 7,213,676.00 $ 71,557.001 $ 7,285,233.00 $ 5,000,978.00 69% TOTAL $ 8,381,000.00 $ 8,179,349.00 $ 71,557.00 $ 8,250,906.00 $ 5,533,107.00 H:wp.dialen8\eng\J-34-1\J431.xls Change Order No. 5 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site And Security Improvements Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 APPROVAL CONTRACT COST TO PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED TIME AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE CONTRACT COST DATE INCREASE (DAYS) TO DATE (DAYS) CONTRACT 11/20196 $ 7,122,693.00 $ 7,122,693.00 730 730 CO NO, 1 6/25197 $ (4,170.00) $ 7,118,523.00 (0.06) 0 730 CO NO, 2 8127/97 $ 50,415.00 $ 7,168,938.00 0.65 0 730 *CO NO. 3 10/15/97 $ 24,570,00 $ 7,193,508,00 0.99 0 730 *CO NO. 4 11/5/97 $ 20,168.00 $ 7,213,676.00 1.28 0 730 CO NO. 5 PROPOSED $ 71,557.00 $ 7,285,233.00 2.28 0 730 Approved by General Manager per delegated authority Board Resolution No. 95-9 H:\wp.dta\eng\ENG\J-34-1\J341 xis d b Pagel of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors, Inc. CO. No. Five(5) Date:December 17, 1997 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Uwrade.Job No J-34-1.Phase II Site and Security Improvements Job No. P2-35-5,Conveyor Belt Access,Job No.SP19950003 Amount of this Change Order(Add)(De6uet) $71,557.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. J-34-1 ITEM 1 - Revise Grating at Surge Tower Number One This item is for revising the circular grating at the top of Surge Tower No. 1 from fiberglass to aluminum. Additional costs for bearing pads and banded edges for the aluminum grating are also included. This change was required because the originally specified pultruded fiberglass grating cannot be fabricated into truncated pie sections required for this circular walkway. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change No. 7). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8.850.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - Revise Conduit Routing at East Secondary Sludge Pump Station This item is for revising the routing of sixteen proposed conduits in the East Aeration Tunnel which connects to the pump station basement. The original contract drawings show the conduits attached to an existing pipe support system in the tunnel. Field investigations revealed that this routing conflicts with access to an existing door, blocks access to an existing 12KV electrical pull box, and restricts headroom in the entrance into the tunnel from the pump station basement. The conduits were relocated to the opposite side of the tunnel requiring a new support system, additional conduit and fittings, and two additional pull boxes. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 1D-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change No. 11) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $44,541.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 7 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors.Inc. CO.No. Five(5) Date:December 17. 1997 Job: Ocean Oudall Reliability Uoarade Job No J-34-1 Phase II Site and Security Improvements Job No.P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access Job No.SP19950003 ITEM 3—Stairway Modifications at Surge Tower Number Two This item is to extend an elevated stair landing above Valve Box Number No. 3. The spiral stairs conflict with the wall of Valve Box No. 3. The valve box is not shown on the contract drawings and is located at the base of the surge tower. The extension of the platform relocates the final descent of the stairs beyond the wall of the valve box. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change No. 13, Field Change Order 15) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $15,885.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4— Raise 14"Vent Pipe at Surge Tower Number Two This item is to raise the existing carbon steel vent pipe on Surge Tower No. 2 to eliminate a conflict with the new spiral stairs. The revisions raise the pipe four feet to provide safe headroom between the stairs and the pipe. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change No. 14) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,503.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5— Miscellaneous Structural Steel Modifications This item is for the net costs associated with the following revisions to structural steel: a) Revising the orientation of platforms in Valve Box No. 5 to provide access to the valve actuator. The orientation of the actuator was shown incorrectly on the contract drawings. b) Deleting lower access platforms in Valve Box Numbers 2 and 5. The new actuators do not need the lower platforms in these boxes. c) Reduce the depth of the upper platform framing members to ten-inches to provide grating flush with the tops of wails at Valve Box No. 5 d) Rotating the proposed stairway on Surge Tower No. 1 to eliminate a conflict with a proposed retaining wall footing at the base of the tower. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change No. 9, 16, 17, 18) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $370.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors. Inc CO.No. Five(5) Date: December 17. 1997 Job: Ocean Oulfall Reliability Upgrade,Job No.J-34-1. Phase II Site and Security Improvements. Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access. Job No.SP19950003 ITEM 6—Electrical Duct Bank Revision This item for additional wst to reroute an electrical duct bank to pass below undisclosed utilities between Distribution Center B and proposed Manhole No. 103 shown on Drawing E-2. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Field Change Order 20) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7092.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7—78" Flap Gate Modifications This item is for the fabrication of a new stainless steel frame for the existing 78-inch Flap gate at the Rothrock Pump Station. Detailed Specification 52-4001 specifies that this existing gate and frame to be refurbished. The cast iron frame for the gate which was notable to be observed during the design phase of this project due to its location within the facility, was determined to be deteriorated beyond repair. Credit for the refurbishment of the frame is included in this item. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A)of the General Provisions. (Reference Field Change Order 18) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,063.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8—Rothrock Station Backfll This item is revising material requirements for backfilling the abandoned Rothrock Pump Station. The specified Class C concrete is revised to cement slurry and the imported sand is replaced with select material taken from the plant site. Backfill compaction is ninety-five percent as specified in the original contract documents. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Field Change Order 19) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($3,204.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors,Inc. CO. No. Five (5) Date:December 17, 1997 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Umrade Job No J-34-1 Phase 11 Site and Security Improvements, Job No.P2-35-5.Conveyor Belt Access. Job No.SP19950003 ITEM 9— Revision of Schedule of Prices for Foundation Piles This item is to revise the contract schedule of prices to correct a Contractor error on the bid form. The Contractor mistakenly reversed the unit prices for changing foundation pile lengths before and after the manufacture of production piles. This mistake was also transferred to the contract. The Schedule of Prices is revised as follows: Add or deduct price for each linear foot of foundation piles(as specified in Section 52), more or less per linear foot, add or deduct (do not include in total contract price)...........................$ 8.00/1-F Add or deduct price for each linear foot of foundation piles in place(as specified in Section 52), more or less than indicated on the plan, if the change is ordered after the manufacture of production piles. Prestressed, precast concrete pile, per linear foot, add or deduct(do not include in total contract price)...........................................................................................................$250.00/LF Staff recommends approval of the revised unit prices. Seventy-five foundation piles were each reduced by ten foot in length. The change was ordered before the manufacture of production piles. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change 5) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($6,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Job No. 132-35-5 ITEM 10— Revisions to Site Modifications This item is for the following revisions to site modifications: a) Delete paving, curb, and pavement headers in Site 5. Paving in this area is being deleted because future facilities may be constructed in the area. b) Provide a 12-inch storm sewer in lieu of the 6-inch storm sewer shown in Site 5. Realign the sewer to the west side of the site. The work also includes extending the sewer to drain an adjacent existing paved road at the south end of the site. c) Increase the paving section to the District's Standard of four inches of asphalt over eleven inches of aggregate base in Sites 4 and 6. The Detailed Specifications only require three inches of asphalt over six inches of aggregate base, which is insufficient in heavy traffic areas. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plan Change 10) CREDIT AMOUNT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($39,086.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days q Page 5 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors Inc CO. No. Five (5) Date: December 17, 1997 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade,Job No,J-34-1. Phase II Site and Security Improvements, Job No.P2-35-5.Conveyor Belt Access,Job No. SP19950003 ITEM 11 - Landscaping Modifications This item is for additional costs associated with high sodium levels discovered in the imported soil in landscaped areas. Tests on imported soil revealed high sodium levels not present in previous soils tests. An investigation of the cause indicated that the sodium levels could be attributed to higher sodium levels in reclaimed irrigation water and migration of salt from adjacent onsite soils in the plant. This item is for additional costs for the following items: a.) Maintain plants during the investigation of the problem. Costs include future maintenance of these plants until remaining landscaped areas are completed. The specified 90-Day Maintenance period will commence for the complete project when all landscaped areas are complete. b.) Amend all planted areas with gypsum to reduce soil salinity. c.) Replace two hundred sixty five pittosporum crassifolium shrubs with more salt tolerant sistus shrubs. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Feld Change Order No. 17) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $16,543.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $71 ,557.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 6 of 7 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors,Inc. CO. No. Five(5) Date: December 17, 1997 Job: Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade,Job No.J-34-1. Phase II Site and Security Improvements, Job No. P2-35-5,Conveyor Belt Access Job No.SP19950003 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date. January 9, 1997 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: January 8, 1999 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 7,122,693.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 90,983.00 This Change (Add)(Dedbia $ 71,557.00 Amended Contract Price $ 7.285.233.00 I: Page 7 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors. Inc CO. No. Five(5) Date:December 17. 1997 Job: Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrade,Job No.J-34-1. Phase II Site and Security Improvements. Job No,P2-35-5.Conveyor Belt Access.Job No.SP19950003 Board Authorization Date: December 17, 1997 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Approved as to Form: Director of Engineering Date Contracts/Purchasing Manager Date Accepted by: Advanco Constructors Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Fmeeeng Dale z cr 17 AGENDA REPORT �,?,ql em Numbe P - , County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Enginee Prepared by: Tod Haynes, Supervising Engineer SUBJECT: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 1.1 to Job No. P1-36-2 with Margate Construction, Inc. for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 in the amount of$69,628.00. SUMMARY Change Order No. 11 includes seven items of added work to Job No. P1-36-2. There are no errors and omissions items associated with this change order. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $1000.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $35,291,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ (28,716.00) This change (Add) (Deduct) $ 69,628.00 Changes Orders to Date $ 40.912.00 Percentage Increase/Decrease $ 0.12% Amended Contract Price $35,331,912.00 Value Engineering Credits $ 329.194.00 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:A.31) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Job No. P1-36-2, Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, consists of expanding the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1. The project provides ten new secondary clarifiers, replacement of the existing aeration system, renovation of existing blowers, renovation of three existing dissolved air flotation thickeners, three new dissolved air flotations, and other improvements. These improvements will X,Np Report cmmda Fm. ., 10111197 Page 1 increase the secondary treatment capacity from forty six million gallons per day to eighty million gallons per day. The contract also includes a new pump station for the Orange County Water Districts. The plans and specifications were prepared by Carollo Engineers and the construction contract was awarded to Margate Construction Inc., in June 1995. The contract is no approximately 86.0% complete. The following summarizes the change order: ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE 1 Reroute Utilities in Tunnel No. 11 $ 8,547 0 Design Change 2 Remove Insulation in Plenums $ 1,314 0 Changed Conditions 3 Blower Insulation 6 8.918 0 Design Change 4 •secondary Effluent Overoxcavation $ 9.877 0 Changed Conditions 5 Existing Clarifier Modifications $10,343 0 Changed Conditions 6 Secondary Effluent Duct Bank $14,342 0 Changed Conditions Conflict 7 Visual Monitoning of Process $16,287 0 Design Change TOTAL—Change Order No. 11 $69,628 0 All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the design phase. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS None ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table Change Order Status Report TDH.In H1w Rep Fo, R—. ,a„A, Page 2 e4 b BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTITASK (ADOPTED BY AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZED TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO CORF) DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED DATE DATE(%) FUNDS DESIGN $ 1,406,065 $ 1,406,065 $ - $ 1,406,065 $ 964,624 69% STAFF $ 3,358,245 $ 3,358,245 $ - $ 3,358,245 $ 1,946,967 58% CONTRACTOR $ 35,835,690 $ 35,262.284 $ 69,628 $ 35,331,912 $ 30,414,667 86% TOTAL $ 40,600,000 $ 40,026,594 $ 69,628 $ 40,096,222 $ 33,326,258 83% Hiwp.d[a\eog\ENG\P1-36-21P1362.s1s Change Order No. 11 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-36-2 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (DAYS) CONTRACT 6/28/95 $ 35,291,000.00 $ 35,291,000.00 0.00 900 900 CO NO. 1 11/22/95 $ (297,500.00) $ 34,993,500.00 (0.84) 0 900 CO NO. 2 616196 $ - $ 34,993,500.00 (0.84) 0 900 CO NO. 3 8/28/96 $ (100,226.00) $ 34,893,274.00 (1.13) 0 900 CO NO, 4 9/25/96 $ 24,733.00 $ 34,918,007.00 (1.06) 0 900 CO NO. 5 10/3/96 $ 29,251.00 $ 34,947,258.00 (0.97) 0 900 CO NO. 6 3/26197 $ 179,966.00 $ 35,127,224.00 (0,46) 0 900 CO NO. 7 4/23197 $ 130,573.00 $ 35,257,797.00 (0.09) 28 928 CO NO. 8 4/24/97 $ - $ 35,257,797.00 (0.09) 98 1026 CO NO. 9 8/7/97 $ (2,479.00) $ 35,255,318.00 1.03 0 1026 'CO NO. 10 10/16/97 $ 6,966.00 $ 35,262,284.00 0.67 0 1026 CO NO. 11 Proposed $ 69,628 $ 35,331,912.00 0.12 0 1026 Approved by General Manager per delegated authority by Board Resolution No. 95-9 H:\wp,dtaleng\eng\p1362\P1362.XLS\CO Star Rpt Y Page 1 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: December 17 1997 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-36-2 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduct) $69,628.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — REROUTE EXISTING UTILITIES IN TUNNEL NUMBER ELEVEN This item is for rerouting existing Potable Water, Industrial Water, High Pressure Air, Drain, and several small diameter chemical feed pipes in Tunnel Number Eleven where they conflict with the proposed routing of the new Waste Activated Sludge piping. These existing utilities conflicted with the routing of the proposed piping at two congested tunnel intersections and were rerouted to provide room for access through the tunnels. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-51 ) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,547.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2— REMOVE ACOUSTICAL INSULATION IN BLOWER INLET PLENUMS This item is for removing existing undisclosed acoustical insulating materials from the inside of the existing blower inlet plenums. The existing plenums are being utilized for the new blower installations. The insulation was found to be old and friable which could possibly damage the new blowers. The existing insulation was not shown in the contract documents. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-59 ) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,314.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days s d Page 2 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: December 17 1997 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 ITEM 3—ACOUSTICAL INSULATION AT PROPOSED BLOWERS This item is for providing new acoustical insulation for the four blowers and reinsulation of four discharge check valves. The cost for the insulating the blowers is being equally shared with the Contractor as part of the value engineering agreement described in previous Plan Change Number Three. This agreement provided for sharing the cost of insulation to mitigate noise levels below 95 DBA. This noise level was exceeded at startup of the blowers. The cost for insulating the discharge check valves is required to replace insulation removed when new check valves were provided under previous Field Change Order Number 38. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-71). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,918.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4— OVEREXCAVATION OF 66' SECONDARY EFFLUENT LINE This is for a changed condition removing peat discovered in the pipe foundation zone of the 66" Secondary Effluent Pipe supplying treated effluent to the Orange County Water District Pump Station. Peat is an unsuitable material for pipe foundations and was replaced with crushed rock. This item was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-65) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,877.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days V Page 3 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Eleven It 1) Date: December 17 1997 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-36-2 ITEM 5—MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING CLARIFIERS This item is for refabricating existing collector Sight guide rails in the fourteen existing clarifier basins. The guides were not shown in the contract drawings. Previous Plan Change 15 provided for the removal of these rails as it was assumed that the Flights would clear the bottom of the concrete scum troughs. The first scum trough was completed and it was observed during startup that the flights actually do conflict with the new troughs. This conflict is being eliminated by refabricating the rail to guide the flights below the new scum troughs. The collector flight chain is being also loosened to provide slack to allow the flights to pass under the troughs. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,343.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 6— ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK CONFLICT AT 66' SECONDARY EFFLUENT LINE This item is removing and replacing an electrical duct bank conflicting with the installation of the 66'Secondary Effluent pipe providing treated effluent to Orange County Water District Pump Station. The drawings indicated that an electrical manhole on the duct bank was located to the west of the proposed pipeline. However, field investigations revealed that there was not enough clearance between the proposed pipeline and existing manhole to install construction shoring. Costs include removing and replace the duct bank in the trench zone and additional excavation and backfill required to provide sloped trenches. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-61). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 14,342.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Eleven It 11 Date: December 17 1997 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-36-2 ITEM 7—VISUAL MONITORING PROCESS This item is for the following changes to allow visual monitoring of the plant process by plant operators: a) Remove existing precast concrete covers from forty-four access openings in the aeration basin deck and store on the plant site. b) Provide new Gear anodized handrail around the forty-four openings in the aeration basin deck. c) Delete proposed covered grating for the Mixed Liquor and Return Activated Sludge Channels located at the existing Secondary Clarifier Numbers One through Fourteen. Provide grating at Return Activated Sludge drop boxes located in the Return Activated Sludge Channels. d) Delete covers on proposed grating at new Secondary Clarifier Numbers Fifteen through Twenty-Four. The costs include additional costs for removing the covers and handrail and credits for deleting the requirement for covered grating. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P1362-80, 81). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 16,287.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $69,628.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 5 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: December 17 1997 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-2 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 18, 1995 Original Contract Time: 900 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 5, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 126 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 1,026 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: July 9, 1998 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $35,291,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (28,716.00) This Change Changes (Add) $ 69.628 .00 Amended Contract Price $35,331,912.00 Page 6 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor Margate Construction C.O. No.: Eleven (11) Date: December 17 1997 Job: Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Construction Manager Date Approved by: Approved as to Form: Director of Engineering Date Contract(Purchasing Manager Date Accepted by: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION Contractor Date PDC COMMITTEE Mee09gDate AGENDA REPORT I.R. e, e e County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineers lw Prepared by: Chuck Hodge, Engineer SUBJECT: Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station at Pant No. 1 P1-51-R GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an increase in authorized funds of $188,000, bringing the project total to $1,208,400 to cover all anticipated costs required to complete construction of the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Refueling Station. SUMMARY The 1997/98 CORF Budget does not include sufficient funds to finish construction of the CNG Refueling Station. Additional costs are required for District's staff labor and overhead, equipment procurement delays, construction soils testing, additional surveying, legal expenses, construction change orders, and contingencies. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table and Construction Cost Payback Analysis BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The CNG Refueling Station will be used for refueling sludge handling trucks. As such, the CNG Refueling Station falls under "Support Facilities'. The proposed action will increase the total amount of authorized funds by $188,000 (ie., a 18% increase above that which is presently authorized). Since insufficient funds are available for completion of this project, the $188,000 will come from Districts Reserves. The original payback analysis conducted by the General Services Administration Department (GSA) indicated that it would take nine years to recover the previously approved project total cost of$1,020,400.00. The revised payback analysis (see attached) conducted by the GSA now indicates a payback of about ten years based on a revised project total cost of$1,208,400.00. x wn a.wp,Exuw,s,m«emw aun,i.sr or R. ,a•,rn, Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION i In October 1995, the Directors authorized $835,374 for the Districts to build, own, and operate a compressed natural gas (CNG) refueling station for use by Pima Gro, the Districts' future CNG powered fleet, other local government agencies, and the general public. In January 1996, the Boards approved a professional services agreement with Southern California Gas Company to provide design and construction management services and authorized the General Manager to solicit bids and award purchase contracts to the lowest bidders for long-lead equipment items, which are the gas compressors, gas dryer and the storage vessels. On May 14, 1996. bids were received for the long-lead equipment items and the low bids totaled $326,866. In April 1996, the Boards approved the plans and specifications and authorized the General Manager to receive bids for the installation of the station. Three bids were received on May 28, 1996 ranging from a high bid of$980,600, to a low bid of$695,000 from Nova Automation. On June 6, 1996, the PDC Committee recommended award to Nova Automation and approved a staff request for an increase of the project budget to $1,021,866. Prior to the June 1996 Board Meeting, Nova Automation requested to withdraw their bid, filed Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Proceedings and disbanded, therefore the$1,021,866 was not approved by the Boards. On October 23, 1996 the Boards approved an action to approve Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P11-51, receive and file the letter from Nova Automation withdrawing their bid, reject all bids (the next highest bidder was 23% higher than the Nova Automation), approve plans and specifications for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid) increasing the budget $184,992, from an amount of$835,374 to a total amount of$1,020,366, and authorize the General Manager to set a bid date for Job No. P1-51 (Rebid). The plans were revised to relocate the CNG refueling station closer to its electrical power source to reduce the cost. The design changes for the relocation of the CNG refueling station were provided by Southern California Gas Company at no additional cost to the Districts. The Engineer's estimate for installation of the compressed natural gas station was $679,000. On November 19, 1996 two bids were received ranging from a high bid of$678,200 to a low bid of$663,856, submitted by Airpol Construction, Inc. Airpol Construction, Inc.'s bid contains a bid irregularity in that one of the two line items was left blank. The total for the bid, however, matches the remaining line item. On December 18, 1996, the Boards awarded a contract to Airpol Construction and a notice to proceed was issued on March 12, 1997. The construction is approximately 75% complete with an anticipated completion date of January 31, 1998. x�.v wwgExLiv,.stxw..o.a uxz.+„asr aoi R-. ,nnnr Page 2 This request is to authorize $188,000 to fund Districts staff costs for design, project management, construction support, and other additional unfunded costs. These include legal fees to prepare contract documents and arrange for a Letter of Credit to guarantee performance by the supplier of Districts' pre-purchased equipment. Other unfunded costs include construction soils testing and survey work resulting from a contract plan change. Additional funds are required for construction change orders and contingencies. ALTERNATIVES None CEC.A FINDINGS Notice of Exemption filed in August 1996 ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Construction Cost Payback Analysis CH:jmf n Wq.NaYrpFNGNIdIfiWrIaM UN.111-97.1 MW Page 3 JOB NO. P1-51R BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE BUDGET I FUNDS THIS TOTAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED (ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURE %COMPLETE TASK BY CORF) TO DATE REQUEST FUNDS TO DATE TO DATE Equipment 399,300 326,866 1 0 1 326,866 256,000 80% Installation 426,074 663,856 0 663.856 256,500 40% New Gas Service and Meter Assembly* 55,000 55,000 0 55,000 55,000 100% on ngency 5, Subtotal 880,374 1,060,900 0 1,060,900 582,678 N/A GasCo Design* 25,000 50,000 0 50,000 50,000 100% GasCo Project Management 69,500 64,500 0 64,500 32,000 55% Districts Labor/ Overhead 0 0 170,000 170,000 138,000 81% Construction Change Orders 0 0 5,000 5,000 2.210 44% Soils Contract 0 0 2,000 2,000 2,0D0 100% Survey Contract 0 0 2,000 2,000 2,000 100% LegalFees 0 0 4,000 4,000 3,376 90% on ngency Project Total 974.874 1,176,400 188,000 1,363,400 812,264 N/A Gas Company Contribution 89,500 (105,000) 0 (105.000) (105,000) 100% AUMIJ contdbu0on (50,000) (50,000) 0 (50,000) 0 0% CSDOC Costs Total 835,374 1,020,400 188,000 1,208,400 707,264 N/A Page 1 11G4Bi Pa .1.g2 A Proiolma COnslluctlon Cost PaYeaok MaNsis COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS STATION Dollars are times 1000 Ref DMMI, FMAe CeWW Y.2 YW] Y.4 Year5 Years Yev] YvrB Yee• Yev10 Yeer11 Year 12 Year l] Year 14 Ym15 1 REVENUESCT SAVINGS 2 SM.RemiwY-HAULERS IRON t 0.9I t M64 i Imm t mum S fal t B1.d f IMAM i "m i b.64 t b.64 t IMAM J M." f 94.94 f INS1 J 94.b 3 Make Recovery-OCSO f a.M 4.0 S.M S.A S.i3 8.02 Am Sal SIT 6.% 6.97 0.M 9.M 4 SMdn RewMry-CITIES f OBS AA1 N.M A)B A. N.10 40.10 49.10 0.10 49.10 49.10 49..10 0.10 49.40 5 SNIIon Recovery-RNNSOW s 0.91 Id.10 1bJ0 Ib.10 Id.10 1b.10 1d.10 1b.10 1b.10 Id.10 1d.10 Id.10 Id.10 id.10 1d.10 B SMNn RecOWry-OTHERS f IM - 4M 4.W 4.82 5.17 6A3 STO AM 6.28 AM IMAM 7.37 T OOMr Rev', 8 OOer Rev', 81080IMa Tmd"Mebeas N.M mom 54.08 Sam MAS MAO M.53 MISS 8813 1M.18 IM.IB IM.16 1MAG NATO 9 TOTAL REVENUES 3 252.M f2M23 S302.31 fMOTS S]N.51 f 345.M f 345.M f MITI f NATO f 3M.M i W23 f MIS J 388.M t 3N.31 10 STATION EXPENSES&COSTS 11 CemmMly(Me.) SoAm f M.55 f e0A S M.M $ MIT f 67.0 f ION S STM S Mrs S 67.M i M.m t SAM $ MIS $ M.22 S MM 12 Taws(eaulem Sd])(aTenf.l l]) 13.90 1971 20M 31.M MAO 23.m MIS ELM 32.3) M.M 22.42 11,17 22.51 22.53 13 1.1m.Demen6(SO".) - - - - - 14 So Cal TnOmMMfon Costs NTTm f00m 14.]4 1].24 1T.M ISM Im 18A5 18.M It" IBM IB.M 1SN MA2 IB.N 18.N 15 Flared SMen Melnlasawe TOM18.m IBM IB.M ISM 18A0 18.M 18M IB.w 18.w 16Ao HIM IBAO Im 16 VeMEIO SM.MelnMvnw 17 PoeeN S0035 I'm IO.M 10.]6 fl.d 11.4 11.11 11.18 11.18 I1.M Ism113J 1134 11H 119 18 Cmer E*Ew: 19 OMm Ery: 20 TOTAL EXPENSES S lIZ14 S IM27 f 132M f 1$,M f 13578 f 07.01 f IWZ4 5 IN]A9 f 137.75 S 1M.m S IMIS 13 TIAN i 1MM t 138M 21 ANNUAL NET OPERATING INCOME S 140.M S1M.BT tIMA3 1".73 SId.T3 S 2M.M $ 20 1 S 3M.M S 2M.M S IMAM S 231.10 f 231.M f m1Ai f MIAMI 22 ACCUM NET OPERATING INCOME f 1N.b 33WM $478.47 S MM $MT.IM S1.065.M M,2T4.2] f1.N2,M f1M1M SI,%l S2,1MB7 32.9A15 S2A18,01 62m..M 23 CONSTRUCTION OR ACQUISITION COSTS 24 Fadtft,C M 3 1,M7.40 25 CmMeulans Fram OMM(Gnnls.Ek) IMAM M NETOSOCONSIRUC➢ONCOST f 1.2MM 27 PROCEEOSFROMBORRONING /.ML t - am MOO ww MAO s m smIQM M.M $m :::.Mm M.M. I'MIS -.::.MIS. 28 PRESENT VALUE MNLY61s 28 Aetumee quauM M eM lnlel RM 5%e: NO Pment Value of Annuat Case Rave 5% $ 1.2MA0) 3 12LM S 10.1.0] S 13BR f IY.R f 1fifi.d f WAS f IbM f IM.A i 1M.26 f 1903 f INN IS 122.0111 116.81 f I1L0 ]I Proeanl Valw WAccum CesO FIM 5% 61RM.4013 13I.M J2]OW 341U.M 5548.51 f]OLM 3 MBM IT 99086 E1,IIS 1J SIRSS.H J1,3M.N f1.51T.11 JlWAIM S136017 f1,11M510 32 ACCUM PV,CSOCOSTS LESS INCOME Sp200,40l fp,Mo.M) fIMT4]I fOeT# fIM4M1 fISm.M) f (0S6.741 f (217 75) f IM.2]I f 4501 f IMm f Tmlt 1 S N1.SB I S SM." S M9.70 335$QCon,nMaepHauHeklnwC em P.M6wx PRMback PPMMek PmWIM% &r Mdca PaMWee d A1MYInwastFwnhms®Mao RMe MNORgsI 89f . S 80M. S. Mi11 i A61 is MIM EM S .TT.II i SAW 5 '.SAM IT WAT S M,nJ t. -MM s ImA9 s Imm jIg"I i'.110.53 35 Acum IOI6MIFATMp4BNPPgeg B%.: 6' MA2. 3�.12JAB 0;1M4T. f'�BOA2 i3MM f:I1S.B] i.Mt.IM i 6T6A8 S":88030 i TMM S,,8MBT S'M1.Z1. t m'PM4MIMMMAe01MMYmtiba lnM 6% . :i - MA2 i AT is t 1TLM S 2]O.1] i Mi.it f 1M19 3 ImM i' IMa4 Sl im fl,M. BTeM 3 iJ2W t BMAi i'1AA8 BOSBO I -f 1831 [ NGV4XL5 Impel 101N8) Pon zalz Prolosma Com1mclion Cost Payback Analysis COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS STATION Dollars are times 1000 RN Desswu. Ywr18 Kbl) Year 1B Yab 18 Yev TO Yw 21 Yea 22 1 Vev]J I YwN Tw36 TAW 1 REVENUES Or UVINGS 2 SMtlw Rawwry-NAULENS RAIN) i w." 3 w.04 S w.84 S 84.84 i w84 i w84 S sat i MR i w04 i w.B1 32.2)1.W 3 SIeBw Rew,sry`OCSO BB) a." B.B) 8.0T B.B) B.B) 8B) 8.0T SB) e.0r IN.p 4 SWJoo Recovery CITIES 48.10 40.10 48.10 0.10 48.10 0.10 49.10 ".10 48.10 OB.10 1.11531 B Sota.Racowry-RAINBOW 1w.10 IWAO Iw.10 104.10 Iw10 Iw.10 1w.10 104.10 tw.10 1w.10 2A00.50 0 91Wen Rem,eryOTHER3 T.BI 0.03 8.42 8.64 BSB 8.14 10.23 10.14 N.20 11.W t5845 1 Castile,: B Other Rev: BlowWaTmtlIInO88WnBa 108.10 100.I6 100.10 Into Iw.10 1011.16 100.10 108.10 late 1w.18 MIN 8 TOTAL REVENUES i SIO.W A J)O.BB i VIM i 371.e1 i 372.0 i 312.71 S 37320 S 3)3.)1 i W420 i 374.01 iM01.12 10 STATION E%PENSEBBLOSTB 11 Corrot Roans) S 0,37 S WAS S WAS i MR S G.11 i MAI S MAI S 0..0 i W13 i 014 i1.011.38 12 TaeaallMulaN`i.w)Ramvs,4AM MAI 22.05 23.70 2278 22.82 22M 22M ".at 2J.OB ZLIB WAS 13 InNnMle Dwme IWOOMemll 14 Be Cal TmnspMatloo Costs(Mom) 10.48 IBM 18.52 18.55 10.5) 18W 13A3 1885 18.W 18.11 437.13 15 Flood BIasn Malnbnanm law law low law IN 1800 1B.00 1000 IB.00 lam 4uW le Vb1eW Boston Melnbnanu 11 Power lAkwho 11.20 11,A 11.31 11.= "N 11 A! 11 Al 11.30 11.40 11,42 2W.W 18 Obb E, 18 Other E,p: 20 TOTAL PJIPEME9 S MIS S 1WW i MAT i 139.25 3 IW." i 130A3 S 1WA4 S IWm B 1W.M i 10.53 SUMBA ]I AISIUALNETOPERATINOINCOME i 231A) 3 232M 8 23 M 8 2UM 8 MAI f 23].OB 8 231.Y f 2'1385 i 2339e 8 2N.38 i51TIM 22 ACCUM NET OPEMiINGWCOME B3,0W.15 $3.31224 111 i3.777.12 A4A00.B3 11"43.01 54,4)B.b 34.)1001 i4,843A) 36,118.W P COHSTHLLCT ON ORALOO.T.,COSTS 24 Facility Cash 25 CenMBuewa Flom Obm(Owls,Etc) W NET MOCONSTRUOTION COST 27 PIRCICEEDS MOM SORRWNG Wm Sam 10.00 W.w W.w 80.00 Wm $am Saw WOO i M PRESENT,ALOE ANALYSIS 2S ossu.Do..ro OM 1.1I flab: W PrsRoIVelwel Annael Cash F. S W822 i WIN i WW i 9203 S B1.74 S 03.0 S 18A7 S 7007 S 7254 S 0.18 32.13113 31 PMenl Valwal Accom Coth Row S1,W4M 5 2.075 AS i2.1)2.12 i2.2&.IS i2.J5IM 82.43Sn i2.515.3J S2AAIAO 32...04 i2.1J3.13 32 ACCUMPV,=CwTSLESSINCOME i 185.W S 881.18 S 85512 81,055.13 i1,Ip.W i1AE].1B ff,JOB.W 31,303.01)1 A1.455.54 1 5I,SM.13 A fj comoue00n PeMwek In PV Was. PMewri PeMMe4 aidloo,k ale dIN, ejtlw b e 4LMCY PaMSacY aP lewek Pie QQ.B ae MEeek N Mnuel lnMlatl EMaSMa®disc RebtlNo PloNn S 12681 S 191,W i 1WA0 i. 145M is Alm]*:IM31. S JWM S 170,74 B.,iMAB i"IBOm S2b83.07 35 AmenMWMLamIIMstlNO Plgad f1 AB 81381A1 itAeRTB 31845/1. A1AWS1 $2,1e813 '32A2BA0 32,W333 1 A2,WB.0f 32,MI W A r8ValweTAccuminhm U bt, S '800.W S TBA9 Sf0.1011 I 81m3A1 I 31.150m $1,201140 1 51.365.B4 1 31AW.49 51,Wt.w S1AW 5i NGV4.%L8 1'.5e4M , 1 PDC COMMITTEE �a�/�/99 MeetlngDrte 1]J9197 AGENDA REPORT 1cem Nu�Sr County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Califamia FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineers Prepared by: Doug Stewart, Enginee ing Manager SUBJECT: Delegation of Authority Re: PDC Issues GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors, approval of Resolution?9,37 replacing Resolutions 9043, 94-110 and 95.9 for the purpose of changing procedures and authority levels for approval of construction plans and specifications, procurement of Professional Services Agreements for public works projects, and approval of public works construction agreement change orders. SUMMARY At the September 20, 1997 PDC Workshop several proposals were presented to the Board Members related to change in procedures and authority levels for the PDC and staff related to approval of construction plans and specifications, procurement of Professional Services Agreements (PSA) for public works projects and approval of public works construction agreement change orders. The changes are being proposed to improve efficiency and increase productivity of staff by eliminating unnecessary procedures and increasing levels of authority of staff. All of the proposals were favorably received by the PDC and staff was directed to bring back to the PDC formal proposals for further review and approval. The details of each proposal are discussed below. It is anticipated that the Delegation of Authority recommended in this action will be periodically reviewed with the Boards of Directors, at the Boards discretion. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) H\xy Otlb,p\)Na,wn„UIR lom 11E C¢ R«. 1mae7 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION •r Over the last six months, the Delegation of Authority Task Force, comprised of middle-level staff members, has looked at ways to streamline procedures used by the staff, committees and the Joint Board for conducting the day-to-day activities of the Districts. Specifically, the Task Force focused on Districts procedures related to procurement of professional consulting services, approval of plans and specifications, and approval of construction contract change orders, which items are in the purview of the PDC. All of the proposed revisions have been reviewed with the District's General Counsel for compliance to state laws, These items were reviewed with the PDC at the September 20, 1997 workshop and staff is requesting approval of the following changes: 1) Process for Board approval of construction plans and specifications: As part of a self-imposed administrative requirement, the Board currently approves public works plans and specifications prior to advertising projects. The plans and specifications presented to the Board are produced, reviewed and approved by Professional Engineers, licensed by the State of California. Additionally, the plans and specifications are reviewed by staff and stamped "Approved"by the Director of Engineering, who are also Professional Engineers. The Board elects to formally approve all plans and specifications under California Government Code Section 830.6. Immunity from defects in the plans and specs is afforded to the District and the Board when they are approved. The Board regularly provides approval of the plans and specifications after staffs presentation. Requiring a separate approval process, in addition to the action awarding the contract, imposes additional burden on staff in preparation of the board item causes a delay of two months for each public works project. Staff is recommending, that for public works projects, the Board approves plans and specifications at the time of award of the construction contract rather than prior to advertising for bids in order to streamline the process. The recommendation also includes establishing a monthly reporting mechanism to inform the PDC of staff initiated advertisement of public works projects. 2) Process for procurement of Professional Services for small capital projects: With a backlog of more than 100 small capital projects (a small capital project is defined as a miscellaneous capital improvements and facility modifications project related to plant safety, reliability and efficiency enhancements where services are estimated to be less than $100,000), it is imperative to establish a procedure that will allow for expeditious design and implementation procedures. Many small projects involve study/assessment and design tasks that must be done by a Professional Engineer that we outsource through professional service agreements (PSAs). Board Resolutions Numbers 90-43 and 95-9 dictates the existing procedures for PSAs. Board Resolution No. 90-43 establishes the basis for the selection and procurement of professional services and Resolution No. 95-9 establishes the authorities for the execution of these agreements. The current procedure requires that for each PSA, a formal Request for Proposal procedure is used to solicit proposals, responses are reviewed by staff and a PSA is reviewed by the PDC or Selection Committee and approved by the Board for all contracts over $25,000. For PSA's under$25,000 a minimum of three proposals and General Manager approval is required. For each PSA over$25,000, the process requires a minimum of ten weeks to obtain Board approval of a PSA. Alternatively, PSAs less N.My.ft r 7]h.w RId IMJx R. 1z 7 Page 2 than $25,000, which require only the General Managers approval, are processed in two to three weeks. A program is currently in place for soils (geotechnical) and surveying contracts which has been very effective in reducing staff time and project delays for implementing small PSAs. Annually, competitively selected contracts are approved by the Board for three to four firms in each discipline which are then administered by staff throughout the year through issuance of task orders against contracts. Typically each fine has a $100,000 maximum annual cap and staff is allowed to administer the task orders to the firms as workload and need dictates. Task orders under this program can be issued within one week, eliminating the ten-week process required by PSAs not covered under these contracts. Since the inception of the small projects program in 1995, over 180 projects have been submitted to and accepted by the Engineering Department. Due to not having any procedures in place to differentiate or expedite consultant selection and procurement, progress on these small projects has been painstakingly slow. To overcome the existing backlog of approximately 110 small engineering projects and to ensure an expedient execution of future small projects, staff recommends establishing annual, not-to-exceed PSA agreements with a preset number of qualified engineering consulting companies, that would comprise a master list. Approximately, five to ten companies will be selected annually based upon a solicitation and Board approval process. As small projects require a broad range of services in the areas of electrical, instrumentation/control, structural, mechanical and architectural activities, the selection criteria for the master list would be established to ensure that in addition to companies that are capable of providing comprehensive services in all the above areas, companies that offer specialty services relevant to typical Districts'small projects are also included on the list. The type and mix of consultant experience sought will vary from year to year based upon the need for consulting services in the small projects area. Individual project assignments would be made based upon a brief proposal from a minimum of two companies on the master list, solicited by staff using a "short-forth" Request for Proposals, specifically addressing cost and schedule. Based upon the response from the firms, specific task orders would be approved by the Director of Engineering or his designee for execution of the work. The proposed amendment would also provide a waiver to the competitive evaluation process in emergency cases and in situations where only one qualified consultant is available to perform the work. For the first year of the program, staff is proposing an annual budget of$1,000,000 and a solicitation of five to ten design firms. Each firm's contract will have a maximum cap of $200,000 with a maximum single task order limit of$50,000. N.My.ddbngl]M t1 "IX N1 11%d¢ nod. 1a 7 Page 3 3) Process for approval of public work construction agreement change orders: r Board Resolution 95-9 establishes the procedure for processing change orders to construction agreements. The authorities to approve change orders established under this resolution 95-9 and as proposed, are as follows: Construction Agreement Change Orders Current Proposed General Manager $25,000 max each $ 50,000 max each $ 50,000 max total $100,000 or 5% of contract value, whichever is less. PDC Committee S 50,000 max each $100,000 max each $100,000 max total $200,000 or 5%of contract value, whichever is less. Board of Directors NO LIMITS NO LIMITS The values used in table above reflect the additive values of the change order. Deductive change order values are not used in determining the delegated limits. In almost all cases, construction change orders are ratified by the Board after the fact. The only exception is the rare occasion when the change order is exceptionally large, or clearly out of scope or when the delay associated with the Board approval process will not adversely impact conduct of the construction. As discussed at the September 20, 1997 workshop, a study of the change orders going to the Boards over 18 months, conducted by staff, compared the individual and cumulative costs. The results from the study, show the dollar value and the percent of total project cost of the individual change orders, respectively. Individual Change Order Number of Change _ %of Total Value Orders In Sample -'- Change Orders- - Less Than $0 net negative) 6 17% $0 to$25.000 8 2.2% $25,001 to$50,000 10 28% $50.001 to$100,000 3 8% $t 00K to$300K 8 22% $300K+ 1 3 Table VII-2-Change Order Value Brought Before POC a� 1nrae7 Page The following table shows the cumulative value of all change orders for the project compared to the 10% "benchmark' referenced previously. Cumulative Change Orders" Number in Sample % of Total Sample % of Total Project Less than 0% net negative) 7 19% 0%to 5% 13 _ 36% 5%-10% 6 17% 10%-20% 7 20% 20%+ 3 8% Note that 24 of 36, or 67% of the change orders were less than $50,000, and 26 of 36, or 72%were less than the 10% cumulative value. If the$50,000/10% rule applied at CSDOC, approximately 70%of the change orders would not have gone to the Boards. Of the 36 change orders 35, or 97%, were recommended for approval by the PDC. Only one change order was requested to be resubmitted two months later with additional information and subsequently approved. The increased level of the General Managers authority would streamline our procedures and reduce staff time associated with the preparation of documents for Committee and Boards approval. Staff currently reviews all change orders with the committee each month. Staff is recommending that all change orders approved by staff be reviewed with this mechanism. Increasing authority levels to staff or PDC, as presented with the above table, does not affect budgets on any project. After discussion of this item, the PDC modified staff recommendation to the proposed limits shown in this report. The PDC also requested that staff report to the PDC on all construction projects that can "reasonably be expected to exceed 5% change orders"as soon as staff becomes aware of potential for the increase. This change is incorporated into the language of the attached resolution. 4) Process for procurement of Professional Services and Addenda to Professional Agreements The PDC is recommending no increase in the authority levels for Professional Services Agreements and subsequent addenda for the major capital projects. Professional Services Agreements Authority Levels Current General Manager $25,000 max each $ 50,000 max total PDC Committee $ 50,000 max each $100,000 max total Joint Boards NO LIMITS a,w,,, 1mxv7 Page 5 These authority levels would apply to all public works Professional Services Agreements that would be approved outside the annual small projects contracts. 5) Consolidation of procedures with Resolution 97- In addition to the above recommendations for procedural and authority level changes, the attached Resolution 97- combines Resolutions 90-43, 95-9 and 94-110 into a new comprehensive single-source document. Procedures for consultant selection have been updated in Resolution 97- to reflect current procedural practices, as discussed with the PDC in the September 1997 workshop. These changes will be reviewed with the committee in the staff presentation. ALTERNATIVES 1. Maintain existing procedures and levels of authority. 2. Approve requested changes at lesser levels of authority than requested. 3. Maintain existing levels of authority and update procedures to reflect current practice. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Resolution DAUDMS:jmflee H\W,. a4ngklrWsev rtWR form.11-6Aoc R My.CObiq\7]IbbM,MW Mmlta ac Re 12 7 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR: SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES- APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDERS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR: (1) SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES; (2) APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS; AND (3) APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDERS; AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS NOS. 90-43. 94-110 AND 95-9 WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts have, in the interest of uniformity, fairness and cost effectiveness undertaken to establish policies and procedures for the selection and procurement of professional engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: General Provisions This Resolution establishes a procedure to be followed in the selection and retention of professional consultants in the areas of engineering, architecture, environmental, land surveying, construction management services and related services. Professional Technical Consultants are those individuals or fines providing engineering, architectural, environmental or land surveying services which are those professional services associated with research, development, design and construction, alteration, or repair of real property, as well as incidental services that members of these professions and those in their employ may logically orjustiltably perform, including studies, 209 iw semi i -1- 12/9/97 investigations, surveys, evaluations, consultations, planning, programming, conceptual designs, plans and specifications, cost estimates, inspections, shop drawing reviews, sample recommendations, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, and other related services. Services for product testing are excluded. It is recognized that no two individuals or firms have equal skills, training, or experience and that the qualities of such persons vary. Accordingly, professional consultants shall be selected based upon the Districts' discretion and opinion as to which particular consultant is best qualified to perform the work (hereinafter referred to as ,projects") in question. For purposes of this Resolution, "firm" shall mean any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity permitted by law to practice the profession of architecture, engineering, environmental services, land surveying, or construction project management. Evaluation and selection of a consultant firm will include but not be limited to the following: A. The firm shall be of high ethical and professional standing, its members being of good moral character, and it shall be prepared to submit references from persons of known repute. B. The principal and other responsible members of the firm must be registered in the State of California, as required by law. C. A principal member of the firm's staff must have at least ten years' recent experience in responsible charge of work of the type involved in the project. D. At least two additional members of the firm's staff must have at least five years' experience in responsible charge in the field, or fields, required by the project. E. The firm shall be capable of performing the work within the prescribed time limitations considering the current and planned work loads of the firm. F. If all other factors are equal, preference shall be given to a local based firm when more than one firm is being considered. G. A firm selected must certify to having an affirmative action employment program. The Districts also recognize that the scope of services and the qualifications of consultants can differ significantly between major capital facilities projects and small capital projects. The criteria set forth in Paragraphs C and D above may be waived by Districts for small capital projects. 20s -10o 55013 1 -2- 12/9197 The procedures set forth in this Resolution shall govern the retention of such professional consultants. Section 2: Small Capital Projects: Annual Budget Upon approval from the Boards of Directors of an annual budget, Districts'staff shall be authorized to solicit contract proposals with professional engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management firms for all small capital projects as defined and as prescribed herein. Section 3: Small Capital Projects: Approval of Plans and Specifications The Boards of Directors delegate to the Director of Engineering, as a Professional Registered Engineer, the authority to approve the design, plans and specifications for construction of new or modified Districts' facilities that are deemed small capital projects, as defined in Section 4A below. Section 4: Small Capital Projects: Selection of Consultants - Procedure A. "Small capital projects" is defined as a miscellaneous capital improvements and facility modifications, replacement or repairs project related to plant safety, reliability and efficiency enhancements where professional consulting services are estimated to be in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for each project. B. Districts' staff shall compile a master pre-approved list of 5-10 firms having the required expertise to perform the service for a small project. The master list of firms will be selected annually based upon a solicitation, review of qualifications and Board approval. Thereafter, the Department Director shall be authorized to recommend to the General Manager, execution of an annual professional consulting services agreement with each of the parties designated on the approved master list. The professional consulting services agreement for each party on the master list shall be forwarded to the purchasing office which, upon request of the Department Director, shall prepare the appropriate requisition documentation to insure future payment to the consultant. As a need for an individual specific project arises, the District will implement the Agreement by the issuing of its standard form purchase order identifying the speck project by name and number and including the approved scope of work required of the consultant for the project. The scope of work for any individual project, as identified in the purchase order, shall not entail a cost in excess of $50,000.00, with an annual limitation of$200,000.00 for all purchase orders under the provisions of Section 3 of this Resolution, for any one consultant. z0m 5013 -3- 12/9/97 1 i C. The Department Director shall first obtain at least two (2) price proposals from consultants before the subject scope of work and purchase order is awarded to a consultant. This requirement may be waived at the discretion of the Department Director where a determination is made that the subject work is unique such that only one (1) consultant is available to perform the work, or where significant time constraints or emergency conditions dictate that one(1)consultant be solicited for price. The Department Director, or his designee, shall review the proposals specifically addressing qualifications, cost and ability to meet District schedule requirements. Based on the evaluations, the Department Director is authorized to award the project purchase order. D. Once the consultant is selected for the award of a small capital project and the purchase order is executed by the District, the Department Director shall issue the notice to proceed. Section 5: M for Capital Projects: Scope A. For every project approved by the Board(s), and for which outside services are required, the District staff shall develop a comprehensive scope of work. B. The scope shall define the extent of the services and the time required. Section 6: Maaor Capital Projects: Selection of Consultants - Procedure For any professional consulting services where the procedures of Sections 2, 3, and 4 are not utilized, the following procedures shall apply: For professional consulting services to be rendered on a single project that will exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), the following procedures shall be followed: A. Proposals - Notice Requesting. Staff shall prepare a Request for Proposal ("RFP") or a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") for the scope of work which shall include a request for the firm's qualifications, personnel capability, demonstration of firm's capabilities, identification of personnel assigned to the project, estimate of number of hours for each aspect of the project, fee proposals and conflict of interest disclaimer. The Request for Qualifications' process may be used, at Staffs discretion, to narrow the field of firms submitting proposals on the project. Districts shall maintain a comprehensive list of professional consultants' demonstrated competence. Notice shall be mailed to all 20s 'I o 5501a i 4- 12/9197 firms requesting notice of any RFP or RFQ issued by the District. Optionally, notice may be given by publication in professional journals or publications of general circulation. B. Staff Screening Committee. A screening committee of at least two (2)staff members as chosen by the Department Director shall review all submitted proposals and select at least three (3) firms who appear fully qualified for submittal to the respective Selection Committee or District Board, as described in Paragraph D below for further evaluation and selection. C. Proposals - Contents. Proposals submitted shall: (1) Acknowledge the scope of the project and extent of the services required. (2) Include a description of the firm's qualifications for performing the proposed work. (3) In the case of a proposal for construction management services, each firm shall provide evidence that its personnel that will carry out on-site responsibilities have expertise and experience in construction project design review and evaluation, construction mobilization and supervision, bid evaluation, project scheduling, cost-benefit analysis, claims review and negotiation, and general management and administration of a construction project. (4) Include past performance records of the firm. (5) Demonstrate the firm's capabilities to complete the work within the time allotted. (6) Identify the specific key personnel to be assigned to the project. (7) Provide an estimate of the number of hours involved in each aspect of the scope of work for such personnel. (6) Be accompanied by a sealed fee proposal estimate which shall not be opened until the firm is selected as being qualified. SW13 10 sm,a , -5- 1219re7 Thereafter, it shall be the basis, for procurement negotiations. The form of the fee proposal shall be as described in Subsections F2 and F3 below. (9) Contain a conflict of interest disclaimer. (10) Provide any other information required to properly evaluate the firm's qualifications and familiarity with the types of problems applicable to the project. D. Selection Committee - Membership. 1. Joint Works. (a) The members of the Board of Directors Standing Committee principally responsible for the project and contract under consideration for approval shall constitute the Selection Committee for Joint Works projects. (b) At the discretion of the Joint Chairman, additional Directors may be appointed to the Committee to assist in the consideration of proposals for spec projects. 2. Individual Districts. (a) Districts with three member Boards: The Selection Committee of District with a three member Board shall be comprised of the Chairman of the District and a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or his designee. (b) Districts with more than a three member Board: The Selection Committee of a District with more than a three member Board shall be comprised of the Chairman and Chairman Pro Tem of the District, and a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or his designee. E. Review of Proposals by Staff Committee and Selection Committee. 1. The Staff Committee shall review each proposal and the qualifications of each firth with due consideration of office location, reputation in the professional community, experience, both generally and specifically on similar-type projects, the project approach, understanding of the scope of work, financial standing, number of qualified personnel and 5W13 oo ssou 1 -6- 12/9/97 their availability for the project, quality of references, work load and other factors relevant to the project being considered. 2. The Staff Committee, upon completion of their evaluation of all proposals, shall determine those firms deemed to be fully qualified to provide the services sought by District based on their demonstrated competence and qualifications. 3. The Staff Committee, upon making a determination of the fully qualified firms, shall rank the firms considered, in order of preference, based upon the qualification of each, as described in Paragraph 6E1 above. Thereafter the Committee shall open the sealed fee proposal of the qualified firms. Based upon the fee proposal, the committee may recommend to the Selection Committee or the Board(s) of Directors an individual or firm for award of the contract which is not ranked higher than firms with higher fee proposals. 4. The Selection Committee shall receive and review the recommendation of the Staff Committee and either award or recommend to the Joint Boards or the individual District Board, either the approval or disapproval of the Staff recommendation to award a contract, as authorized in Section 7 below. F. Procurement and Negotiation of Agreement. To determine the firm to be selected and the compensation for the services sought, the following procedures will be strictly adhered to: 1. The Staff Committee will, at its discretion, invite the firm that is considered to be the best qualified to appear before the Staff Committee. 2. The proposal for fees associated with the services as submitted by the selected firm shall be presented in sufficient detail to enable the Staff Committee to adequately ascertain the level of effort associated with the scope of work and to determine whether the firm has thoroughly identified the efforts associated with the services and thoroughly understands the work required. 3. The basis of the fee shall be: Cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum amount, a per diem rate(s) with a maximum amount, or a lump sum (fixed) fee. 2W-mu SW13 1 -712/9/97 4. If it is the decision of the Staff Committee to use methods for compensation other than the lump sum or cost plus a fixed fee with a maximum, or the per diem rates with a maximum, justifications for this decision shall be made by the Staff Committee in its recommendation to the Selection Committee and the Board(s) of Directors for the services. 5. The Staff Committee shall review the compensation requested by the firm which shall be compared with the maximum fee as previously established. 6. The final negotiated fee, as recommended to the Selection Committee and Board(s)of Directors, shall be certified by the Staff Committee as reasonable for the services requested and not resulting in excessive profits for the fine. 7. If agreement is not reached, the negotiations should be terminated and similar interviews should then follow with the next-ranked fine. 8. All such negotiations shall be on a strictly confidential basis and in no case shall the compensation discussed with one firm be discussed with another. G. Continuation of Services. 1. In some instances where a qualified firm has satisfactorily completed one phase in the development of a project and the Board(s) determines that it is in the best interests of the District(s) to retain the same firm for subsequent phases of related work,the Staff Committee or the Selection Committee may be authorized to proceed directly with negotiations with that firm for the additional work. 2. Continuation of services may arise when a firm has completed a feasibility report or a preliminary engineering report and the services for said work are satisfactory to the Board(s) and the procedure of examining other fines for subsequent phases is not deemed necessary or cost effective. 3. In the event that satisfactory negotiations for price cannot be concluded under these circumstances, negotiations should be terminated and the provisions set forth hereinabove for selection of a firm would apply. H. Specialized Services. zosa.ioo 12/9197 1. In the event that specialized services are required where it is determined that only one qualified firm can best perform the services for a specific project in an amount greater than $50,000.00, the Staff Committee, in the case where the fees are greater than $50,000.00, will report to the Selection Committee said findings and request authority to negotiate directly with the particular specialized fine. 2. The basis of selection of the specialized firm or individual under Section 61-11 above, along with the negotiated fee, shall be presented to the Board(s) of Directors for consideration. I. AA rreement for Services. 1. Upon approval by the Board(s) of a negotiated agreement for professional services, a contract shall be executed in a form approved by the General Counsel. Z The contract shall include, but not be limited to the following terms: (a) A statement of the scope of the project. (b) The basis and individual elements of the fees. (c) The basis for payment to the firm. (d) The time limits in which the services must be performed. (e) Provisions for fee adjustments should there be changes in the scope of work. (f) If it is determined by the Selection Committee that the Districts may be caused to incur a penalty or liability, or suffer a loss because of the failure of the firm to perform the work within specified time limits, the contract shall include a clause setting forth penalties for such nonperformance or delayed performance, in amounts to be determined by the Committee. (g) For projects exceeding $50,000 in fees or in other cases as determined by the Districts, errors and omissions insurance in an amount recommended by the General Counsel (based upon engineering data from the Department Director) shall be required, unless the Standing Committee or DistricPs Board, as the case may be, waives said insurance. XN- SS013 10 1219/97 3. Progress payments made to the firm during the time the services are being supplied shall be based on the work completed to date, as recommended by the responsible staff member. J. Conflict of Interest. 1. The District(s) maintain a Conflict of Interest Code, pursuant to California Government Code Section 87100 et sea., which governs the activities and performance of duties of its officers, employees or agents in the conduct of project work for the Districts. 2. No Director, officer, employee or agent shall solicit or accept rebates, kickbacks, favors or other unlawful consideration from any individual or firth on behalf of any firm that may be potentially selected as a qualified firm to provide professional consulting services to the District. Acceptance of food and refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions and acceptance of gratuities or gifts shall not be deemed a violation of this provision, provided that if said items exceed $260.00 in value, in a calendar year, the Director, officer, employee or agent may be disqualified from participating in the decision pursuant to Article III of the District's Conflict of Interest Code; and provided further, that any Director, officer, employee or agent, as a designated employee under the District's Conflict of Interest Code, has reported said gifts on his/her annual Statement of Economic Interest as required by said Code. 3. Any firm seeking selection under these procedures that violates the District(s) Conflict of Interest Code shall be automatically disqualified. Section 7: Award of Professional Services Agreements for Major Capital Projects A. Professional Consulting Services. The award and execution of an agreement for professional consulting services on behalf of the Districts shall be made in accordance with the following delegations of authority: Authorizing Authority Authorized Action 1. Department Heads Solicitation of Requests for Qualifications ("RFQ") and Requests for Proposals (RFP"). ]09 100 55013 1 -10- 1219/97 2. General Manager Authorization to evaluate proposals and to execute contracts up to $25,000. 3. OMTS, PDC, or FAHR Receive recommendations of Staff and Committee (or Standing General Manager, and approve Profes- (Committees) sional Services Agreements of over $25,000 up to $50,000. 4. Boards of Directors Receive recommendations of Staff, General Manager and Committee, and approve Professional Services Agreements for over $50,000. B. Professional Consulting Services Aqreement Addenda. The award and execution of an addendum to an agreement for professional consulting services on behalf of the Districts shall be made in accordance with the following: Authorizing Authority Authorized Action 1. Department Head Authority to negotiate addenda. 2. General Manager Receive recommendation of Staff and approve contract changes up to $25,000 per addendum. The additive value of the changes shall not exceed $50,000. 3. OMTS, PDC, or FAHR Receive recommendations of Staff and Committee (or Standing General Manager and approve contract Committee) changes between $25,000 and $50,000. The additive value of the changes shall not exceed $100,000. 4. Boards of Directors Receive recommendations of Staff, General Manager and Committee and approve contract changes for over $50,000. Section 8: Maior Capital Projects: Approval of Plans and Specifications The procedure and authority for the approval of the design plans and specifications for construction of new or modified District's major capital projects is as follows: 55013 1 -11- 1219/97 20U 1 r A. For any project with approved budget authority, the Director of Engineering is authorized to advertise for construction bids, set a bid date, and receive all bids. B. For any project, if the engineer's estimate for the construction contract, as provided by the Director of Engineering or the District's consulting design engineer is equal to or less than the approved construction budget for the project, the Director of Engineering may advertise for bids, and upon receipt, the lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder will be submitted to the Board(s) of Directors for approval. C. For any project, if the engineer's estimate for the construction contract, as provided by the Director of Engineering or the District's consulting design engineer, is greater than the approved construction budget for the project, the Director of Engineering shall submit the project to the Standing Committee for recommendation, and based thereon, to the Board(s) of Directors for approval. D. For any project, upon receipt of bids for the construction, if the lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder is equal to or less than the approved construction budget for the project, the bid will be submitted to the Board(s) of Directors. The Board(s)of Directors, upon receipt of the bid, shall approve the plans and specifications of the project and may award a contract. E. For any project, upon receipt of bids for the construction, if the lowest responsive bid of a responsible bidder is greater than the approved construction budget for the project, Staff shall present the bid and a recommendation to the Standing Committee for review and recommendation to the Board(s) of Directors. Section 9: Maior Capital Projects: ADprgyal of Change Orders to Construction Agreements The procedure and authority for the approval of change orders to construction agreements is as follows: A. General Manager. The General Manager is authorized to approve any single change order with a total amount of additions to the agreement (not the net amount of the change order), not to exceed $50,000, and a total cumulative amount for all change order additions to the agreement not to exceed 5% of the original agreement amount, or $100,000, whichever is lesser. B. Planning. Design & Construction Committee. The Planning, Design & Construction Committee is authorized to approve any single change order with a total amount of additions to the agreement(not the net amount of the 20"-100 55010 1 -12- 1219/97 s change order), not to exceed $100,000, and a total cumulative amount for all change order additions to the agreement not to exceed 5% of the original agreement amount of$200,000, whichever is lesser. C. Management and Staff. At such time as the Staff becomes aware of a fact or circumstance that will likely result in total additive change orders exceeding five (5%) percent of the original contract amount, it shall be presented to the Planning, Design & Construction Committee at its next regular meeting for review, consideration and possible action. Section 10: RR1e ealer Districts' Resolutions Nos. 90-43, 94-110 and 95-9 are hereby repealed in their entirety. Section 11: Effective Date This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held 1997. 2aw- mo 5 - 1 -13- 1219197 2 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue t Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday, December 10, 1997, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, December 10, 1997, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: George Brown, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John J. Collins, Joint Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Jan Debay Mike Petennan, Director of Human Resources Barry Denes David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Norman Z. Eckenrode Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Mark Leyes Greg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst Mark A. Murphy Mike White, Controller Thomas R. Saltarelli Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Mark Schwing Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor William G. Steiner Terri Josway, Safety& Emergency Response Mgr. Lisa Lorey, Human Resources Manager Committee Directors Absent : Lenore Crane, Committee Secretary Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Others Present: Other Directors Present: Patti Gorczyca, Public Financial Management, Inc. Toby Weissert, Corollo Engineers None APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of November 12, 1997 meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee were approved as drafted. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 2 m December 10, 1997 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER • General Manager Don McIntyre updated the Committee on the LAFCO process regarding consolidation of the Districts. • There will be a meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee Re Strategic Plan on Thursday, December 18, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. Important policy issues will be discussed and the Directors were encouraged to attend. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE • As requested by Director Peer Swan, included in the COP Monthly Report is a new schedule which shows performance of the remarketing agents comparing each of our issues to the other, and to a staff-developed composite index. • The monthly Treasurer's Report was distributed prior to the meeting in accordance with policy. • The Districts will be receiving the bulk of our portion of the property taxes and user fees this month which will be approximately $30 million. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES • A quarterly report regarding broad banding was supposed to be given at this meeting, however, Mr. Peterman advised that this item is being deferred until the February meeting, depending on the outcome of an upcoming meeting with the union. At present, there is nothing new to report. • Linda Eisman,the Districts'Training Manager, has resigned and is going back to Savannah, Georgia. Internal recruitment for this position is underway. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS • Director of Communications Michelle Tuchman updated the Committee regarding the water conservation measures taken by the Districts, Los Angeles County and the City of Los Angeles last Friday which included news releases resulting in articles in local newspapers and television news broadcasts. She also reviewed the Districts' fine performance during Saturdays El Nifio storm. CBS reported erroneously that there was a sewage spill from our Huntington Beach Plant. Michelle immediately called into the news room and they stopped broadcasting that message, however, they did not correct it. Don McIntyre advised the Committee that we did have a high flow of 503 mgd for about an hour in the afternoon. We handled it very nicely, with just a few minor problems, due to the efforts of a lot of people who came in the help voluntarily. • Information packets on the Groundwater Replenishment System will be distributed to newspapers and the Directors within the next week. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 3 December 10, 1997 REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS(1 -41 1. FAHR97-79: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 1997 AND FORWARD TO THE JOINT BOARDS: The Treasurers Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. 2. FAHR97-80: Receive and file Certificates Of Participation (COP) Report 3. FAHR97-81: Receive and file Employment Status Report 4. FAHR97-82: Receive and file Final Report Regarding Cost Of Workplace Investigation END OF CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 1 through 4 under'Consent Calendar.' ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 5 -7) 5. FAHR97-83: Accept SAWPA's explanation of a sincere difference of interpretation, and waive the interest amounts assessed by staff on the late payments for treatment plant capacity (Financial issues between SAWPA and CSDOC). COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Mr. Streed gave an overview of the financial issues between the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and CSDOC. Partial payments on the 9th and 1 Oth mgd by SAWPA, based on their interpretation of the ten-year payment option in the agreements, led to the Districts administratively imposing interest on the outstanding invoices. Staff and SAWPA have met on these issues and have agreed upon an interpretation of the payment terms. SAWPA has since paid the full amount of the 9th mgd, and 1110 of the total due for the 1 Oth mgd, including interest on an amortized basis. Mr. Slreed advised the Committee that SAWPA is requesting that the Districts reverse the interest charges which amount to approximately$108,000. There would be no out-of-pocket capital cost losses. General Manager Don McIntyre stated that during meetings with SAWPA, he was impressed by SAWPA's sincerity. Discussion took place regarding the legality of the Districts' imposing interest or penalties in this matter. The Committee also indicated they did not want to damage the good will and positive relationship the Districts and SAWPA are currently experiencing. It was also noted that waiving the interest costs would not constitute a gift of public funds. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duty carried to approve staffs recommendation to waive the SAWPA interest amounts assessed by staff on the late payments for treatment plant capacity. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee ' Page 4 December 10, 1997 6. FAHR97-84: Adoption of a formal borrowing and lending program by the Boards of Directors of the individual Districts in order to provide for inter-District loans, with interest, while the Strategic Plan is being completed and a long-term financial plan is being prepared. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Mr. Streed advised the Committee that borrowing for capital improvements was a part of the rate setting process last year. Most of the Districts agreed to continue with the 50:50 mix of borrowing and pay-as-we-go financing. District 1 wanted to increase the borrowing portion in order to smooth their substantial user fee increases. Due to the number of significant financial issues (e.g., reserves study, capital replacement needs, Strategic Plan capital requirements, participation in and funding for the Orange County Water District Reclamation Project, Groundwater Replenishment Project and Districts' Consolidation)which will be brought before the Committee in the next six months, staff is recommending that a delay in a new COP issue should be considered and that Districts 1 and 11 formally borrow from Districts 2 and 3 until a new COP issue is completed. During discussion, the Committee determined that the Districts must maintain separate rate and interest funds for each District due to differing fee structures, and that they may change after consolidation, which will be effective July 1. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Boards of Directors of the individual Districts adopt a formal borrowing and lending program in order to provide for inter-District loans, with interest, while the Strategic Plan is being completed and a long-term financial plan is being prepared. 7. FAHR97-85: Approve Rate Advisory Committee Recommendations as follows: 1. Adopt commercial user categories; 2. Approve the concept of a joint study of flows and strengths; 3. Contact the Orange County Business Council and the Cities for assistance in identifying various commercial users; 4. Conduct a study of flow and wastewater strength from SROs and congregate care facilities; 5. Plan to implement a revised rate structure for 1998-99; and 6. Return to future Committee meetings with recommendations for connection fees and the appeal process for user fees (All Districts). COMMITTEE DISCUSSION Gary Streed introduced Toby Weissert of Corollo Engineers and Jim Herberg, the Districts' Engineering Supervisor. He advised the Committee that this was the first of several reports that would come before the Committee over the next several months. Mr. Streed advised that he was prepared to discuss user fee issues and would return in the next few months to discuss the other issues. He reviewed the recommendations from the Rate Advisory Committee and advised the Committee that it is not our intent to raise SFR rates,just to restructure the commercial and industrial rates. Concerns regarding raising commercial and industrial rates, without doing an economic impact study, were brought up, since this may drive industries out of Orange County. Director Leyes was against any action until all of the other pending Districts' financial issues are resolved. The Committee agreed that the old system of using square footage is grossly inadequate and a move must be made to correct it, however, they wanted a clearer picture of costs in dollars and cents, not ratios, Staff advised that the rate structure is not in place and will be brought back to the Committee for a rate discussion in March or April. Tonight's recommendation is not to approve numbers, but only the concepts. The Committee felt the verbiage for recommendation No. 5 should be changed to read, "Develop a revised rate structure for 1998-99 . . ." Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 December 10, 1997 1 MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve, in concept only, the following Rate Advisory Committee Recommendations with modification to item 5. There were 9 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1. Adopt interim commercial user categories; 2. Approve the concept of a joint study of flows and strengths; 3. Contact the Orange County Business Council and the Cities for assistance in identifying various commercial users; 4. Conduct a study of flow and wastewater strength from SROs and congregate care facilities; 5. Develop a revised rate structure for 1998-99; and S. Return to future Committee meetings with recommendations for connection fees and the appeal process for user fees (All Districts). INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS S. FAHR97-86: Revised method of benchmarking Districts' cost of wastewater treatment per million gallons COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Greg Mathews gave a slide presentation explaining the Districts' revised method of benchmarking the cost of wastewater treatment per million gallons. Mr. Mathews explained that the new proposed Districts' benchmark for treatment costs is $490 per million gallons and is the result of changes in indirect cost allocation. The Districts' method of assigning costs to overhead is now similar to many other Publicly Owned Treatment Plants (POTWs). Mr. Mathews slide presentation included FY 1997/98 Actual Expenses, Changes in Costs, Changes in Flow, Changes in Cost Allocation, and Changes in Dollars Per Million Gallon Benchmark. The Committee requested that Mr. Mathews provide information on the progression of the historic numbers, using prior actuals, to the new ones. 9. FAHR97-87: Accumulated Funds and Reserves Policy Update. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Gary Streed updated the Committee on the status of Districts' accumulated funds and reserves policies. He advised that the existing policy was adopted in 1990 and has been only slightly modified in the interim period. Staff and Public Financial Management(PFM) have been evaluating the Districts' existing policy, options, and policies of other agencies. Public Financial Management prepared a Reserve Study Summary Analysis that was distributed to the Committee at the beginning of the meeting. A telephone survey was conducted of 24 public wastewater, water and utility agencies. Each agency was queried concerning budget levels, annual debt services, value of capital plant, ratings, and use of insurance and levels of discretionary reserves, exclusive of debt, workers' comp and pension requirements, and any cash accumulations for specific pay-as-you-go for near-tens capital projects. With regard to identified reserves, the survey included all discretionary cash reserves, excluding bond related reserves and unspent proceeds, pension and worker's comp reserves, and any cash set aside for near term specific capital outlay The Committee requested that staff expand the information relating to the Capital Budget and total amount of debt. It was also requested that all reserve categories be included in the report not just totaled. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 December 10, 1997 Mr. Streed advised the Committee that this was an information item with no recommendation tonight. A final report will be brought to the Committee in February. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY Director William Steiner provided information to the Committee regarding the status of the Orange County bankruptcy pool settlement. He advised that the County has been meeting to iron out a settlement with LeBoeuf, Lamb, Green & MacRae. The firm's malpractice insurance would cover any payment up to $50 million, which is one of the largest damage settlements ever by a law firth. The proposed settlement with LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, is being held up by the North Orange County Community School District, which is a party to the Orange County lawsuit, and which is suing LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae for$16.5 million. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. FUTURE MEETING DATES There is no meeting scheduled for January. The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 11, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned a 7:14 p.m. SubmitttedA b^y: ) e ora Crane Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Secretary \LLEADOATA2\W P.DTATIN=10\CRANETAHRTAHR.9TDEC\12-9'rMIN.DOC r FAHR COMMITTEE "°°"0'w1e To'r.ea:. 12/10/97 12/17/97 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Uem Number 1 /3, a. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Steve Kozak, Financial Manage SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report for the month of November 1997 (All Districts) (FAHR97-79) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of November 1997 SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), has served as the Districts' professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust as the Districts' third- party custodian, since September 1995. The Districts' Investment Policy, adopted by the Joint Boards, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." The Districts' extemal money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Districts' Investment Policy. The Districts' portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market") values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Dne item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) 1UeaQWaO3by.ftft=1 ftm,vTAHRTAHR.9TUECtiAHR97�79 dm R"N 1N17R7 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long- term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of November 1997 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the Districts' custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. The Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the Districts'funds at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown by the attached bar chart. Book Balances Estimated Funds/Accounts November 30, 1997 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $ 5,267.571 5.7 Union Bank Checking Account 382,674 4.9 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 5,821.000 5.2 Bank of America Checking Account 74,594 4.1 Bank of America Money Market Account 127,400 4.1 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 17,373,334 6.5 PIMCO-Long-tern Portfolio 277,255,825 5.6 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 11,890 5.6 Debt Service Reserves Q Trustees 33,085,144 6.2 Petty Cash 4,400 — Defered Compensation 11.232,154 1.10-33.04 TOTAL $350.635,986 ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. HM Ul ftMift—TAHWARR 9TDE ARR67.76.dw R—..d 7a+7A7 Page 2 V- 9 ATTACHMENTS 1. Monthly Investment Reports 2. Monthly Transaction Reports GGS:SKIc \�sTdapZy.CPYinV11Pnvro1FAXRlFV 1P BN1EpFN0iW.RGoc Ate: IMM7 Page 3 . 11 111 111 So VZ IIIIIIIIIIII ����1"c w..INIw iimuu\ �� N %///// \\\ •..••• •••••. i•�••• •.• IMEN X .•.... Is let XXXXX*! i•�•iiii• •ii*XXN ������•iii iii•�•i•�• ii•�•iii• >•O•i•INS ••••O❖p• O. ••❖•••O•• :•OOOOd :O•i•004 !OOOiii :•iii•Oi• !O•�•iii• i MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 30 November 1997) Liquid Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: p�M $17524,428 Mello $17:373,334 Historical Cost: PIMCO $17,524,428 Mellon $17,376,799 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.14 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1% Change: $24,534(0.14%) 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 100% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return (%): I Month: 0.45 3 Months: 1.36 12 Months: 5.59 Year-to-Date: 5.12 Index Total Rate of Return (%): I Month: 0.42 A MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENTMANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING (for the month ending 30 November 1997) Long Term Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: J211,832,523 MEW Historical Cost: PIMCO $281,634,926 Mellon $277,070,299 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.45 Of Index: 2.40 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gairAoss)of 1%Change: $6,904,897 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 00/0 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 00/6 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 0.22 3 Months: 2.19 12 Months: 6.82 Year-to-Date: 7.01 Index Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 0.19 1A OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BAS': USo 30-NOV-1997 H51100 % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.92 0.92 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2 361,079.10 2,361,079.10 13.47% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3:156,682.78 3,156,681.78 18.01% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 2,664,108.49 2,664,108.49 15.20% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 2,371 818.00 2 371 818.00 13.54% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 3,243:357.92 3:243:357.92 18.51% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 176,832.00 176,832.00 1.01% 0.00 6,631.20 3.75 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 13,973,878.21 13,973,878.22 79.75% 0.00 6,631.20 0.05 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,402,922.88 3,399,456.00 19.40% -3,465.88 191,250.00 5.63 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,402,921.88 3,399,456.00 19.40% -3,465.88 191,2SO.00 S.63 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 149,577.80 149,577.80 0.85% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 149,577.80 149,S77.80 0.85% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 17,526,377.89 avee_17,522,912.01 100.00% 3,465.88 197,881 20 �1.13 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-NOV-1997 HB1100 % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.41 0.41 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 RECEIVABLES 45,801,803.10 45 801,803.10 16.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -91,612,125.74 -91:612,125.74 -32.50% 0.00 0.00 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - DOME 9 995,220.00 9,999,204.30 3.55% 2,984.30 595,000.00 SAS COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 7:815,601.84 7,81S,601.84 2.77% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 718,691.00 719,691.00 0.25% 0.00 26,950.91 3.7S __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS -27,280,809.39 -27,277,82S.09 -9.68% 2,984.30 621,9SO.91 -2.28 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 1S9,703,289.04 160,190,346.51 S6.83% 487,057.47 10,607,259.15 6.62 U.S. AGENCIES 91,812,640.38 92 013,022.00 32.64% 200,381.62 5,854,890.00 6.36 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 10 676.704.19 10:706 785.04 3.80% 30,080.85 710,196.75 6.63 BANKING & FINANCE 31:192,182.76 31,109:796.97 11.04% -82,385.79 2,006,142.85 6.45 INDUSTRIAL 10,935,640.00 10,S13,700.00 3.73% -421,940.00 909,400.00 8.65 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 304,320,456.37 304,533,650.52 108.04% 213,194.15 20,087,888.75 6.60 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,624,934.01 4,624,934.01 1.64% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ___ __________________ ________ --------_-------- ------__-------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,624.934.01 4.624,934.01 1.64% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 281,664,580.99 281,880.759.44 100.00% 216,178.45 20,709,839 66 7.35 Page 1 w\ YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF07511102 1997/11/30 RUM DATE : 12/04/97 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME : 10.52.13 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------w ------------------w---------- --w---- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 176,932.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 176,832.00 1.26 999495906 PUBLIC II 176,832.00 1.02 3,000,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS SYS DISC 5.488 .000 P-1 98.218 2,946,549.17 21.08 313333SA7 01/20/1998 2,946,549.17 16.96 100,000.00 FEDERAL HATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 5.505 .000 P-1 96.464 98,464.33 .70 313589QS5 MAT IV19/1997 98,464.33 .57 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LH BK CONS DISC 5.555 .000 P-1 98.826 2,371,818.00 16.97 313385SP2 MAT OVCV1998 2,371,818.00 13.65 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 5.605 .000 P-1 98.664 2,367,926.00 16.94 313397TH4 MAT 02/20/1998 2,367,926.00 13.63 2,600,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSM DISC 5.605 .000 P-1 98.679 2,565,644.16 18.36 313589RV7 MAT 01/15/19" 2,565,644.16 14.77 300,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR 8K DISC NTS 5.610 .000 P-1 98.936 296,808.75 2.12 313313RV2 01/15/1998 296,808.75 1.71 800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.625 .000 P-1 98.674 789,393.33 5." 63743DA84 01/08/1998 789,393.33 4.54 800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.635 .000 97.961 783,685.33 5.60 36959JAU7 01/28/1998 783,685.33 4.51 800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 6.024 .000 MR 98.500 788,000." 5.63 34539UAE2 01/14/1998 786,000.44 4.54 800.000.00 FED HOME LN WO CORP DISC NTS 6.259 .000 P-1 98.5% 788,755.78 5." 313397RC7 MAT IV29/1997 788,755.78 4.54 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.453 .079 13,973,877.29 100.00 13,973,877.29 80.44 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.314 5.626 AAA 99.984 3,402,921.88 100.00 912827J45 05.6257. 01/31/1998 DO 02/01/93 3,399,456.00 19.57 YLDAIUL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 2 OCSF07511102 1997/11/30 RIM DATE 12/04/97 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE 10.51.13 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MWET VALUE X TOTAL TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.314 5.626 3,402,921.88 10D.00 3,399,456.00 19.57 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL 5.440 .275 17,376,799.17 100.00 17j373,333.29 100.00 YLDWL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSF07522202 1997/11/30 RUN DATE IV04/97 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME f 10.51.15 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION DOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL OTHER EQUITIES .00 .000 .000 .000 .00 .00 996087094 .00 .00 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL OTHER EQUITIES .000 .DOD .00 IDO.00 .00 .00 CASH R CASH EQUIVALENTS 718,691.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 718,691.00 3.87 999495906 PUBLIC II 718,691.00 .22 700,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 5.538 .D00 P-1 99.678 697,746.00 3.76 07815JZ50 12/OS/1997 697,746.00 .22 300,000.00 PROCTER 8 GAMBLE DISC 5.559 .D00 P-1 99.295 297,BB4.00 1.60 7427IRZ83 12/08/1997 297,884.00 .09 900,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.653 .000 P-1 99.714 888,421.50 4.79 63743DACS 01/12/1998 888,421.50 .27 3,900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.696 .000 P-1 98.843 3,854,866.17 20.80 36959JAP8 01/23/1998 3,854,866.17 1.19 2,100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.774 .000 P-1 98.890 2,076,684.17 11.2D 36959JMS D1/22/1998 2,076,684.17 .64 10,000,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 6.000 5.951 99.982 9,995,220.00 53.% 0663J007 05.950% 06/19/1998 DO 06/19/97 9,998,204.30 3.09 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH B CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.038 1.960 18,529,512.84 100.00 18,532,497.14 5.72 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTH TRANCHE GTR 96 .DOD 5.617 Al 100.583 3,970,46D.00 1.32 345402DZ1 FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 4,023,320.00 1.25 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR 0 00177 .000 5.681 Al 99.625 6,999,748.00 2.32 MM02WS VAR/RT 03/50/1999 DO 03/30/94 7,073,375.00 2.19 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE t 4 OCSF07522202 1997/21/30 RUN DATE 12/04/97 ORANBE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME t 10.31.13 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 7,045,080.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.654 3.618 AM 100.203 7,036,042.97 2.31 9128273" 3.6257. 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 7,059,381.51 2.19 25,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.562 5.869 AAA 100.109 15,045,117.19 4.93 912827270 05.875% 10/31/1998 DO 10/31/96 15,016,350.00 4.65 52,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.771 6.756 AM 101.766 53,755,691.40 17.64 912827R20 06.8752 08/32/2999 DO 08/31/94 53,732,448.00 16.63 3,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.798 6.440 AAA 102.875 3,613,203.13 1.18 9128272SO 06.6n7.. 04/30/2002 DO 04/30/97 3,600,625.00 1.11 28,600,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.828 7.096 AAA 105.687 30p272,296.8S 9.92 91282MU 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 30,226,482.00 9.36 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG AWN MTN 5.871 5.892 AM 99.797 5,000,781.25 1.63 31364FFH0 5.8607. 11/05/1999 DO 11/03/97 4,989,85G.00 1.54 4,680,133.09 CHASE HANHATTAN GRAN 95-8 CL A 5.957 5.905 AM 99.920 4,670,443.76 1.53 161614AE2 5.9002 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 4,675,920.97 1.45 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 6.101 6.185 AM 99.750 9,978,ln.00 3.27 999M6619 6.1707. 01/25/2020 9,975,000.00 3.09 28,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.131 6.345 AM 102.437 28,425,468.75 9.41 9128272N1 06.500/ 05/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 28,682,360.00 8.88 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.162 8.898 AM 125.031 6,233,593.75 2.05 912810DES 11.1257. 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 6,253,550.00 1.94 5,000,000.DO U S TREASURY NOTES 6.277 6.164 AM 101.391 4,9%,531.25 1.66 9128272LB 06.2507. OV28/2002 DD OV28/97 5,069,550.00 1.57 4,500,000.DD FEDERAL MATL HTG ASSH HTM 6.291 6.173 AM 100.922 4,488,705.00 1.49 31364CXV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DO 03/03/97 4,541,490.00 1.41 39,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 6.305 6.4% AAA 99.937 39,890,500.00 12.99 3133915B6 6.4907. 09/13/2000 DO 09/13/95 39,575,052.00 12.25 3,040,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN B TR 00491 6.305 7.663 A2 10D.399 1,031,860.00 .32 01238XUJ8 7.6902 OU27/1998 DO OV28/95 1,003,490.00 .31 4,500,000.00 CATERPILLAR FINL HTNS TR00389 6.322 5.795 A2 99.741 4,466,745.00 1.47 14912LSE2 8.7807. 07/15/1998 DO 12/15/95 4,488,545.00 1.39 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF07522202 1997/11/30 RUN DATE IV04/97 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.51.13 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 4,567,173.55 GNMA II POOL 4008OD25 6.375 6.349 AAA 102.375 4,642,817.37 1.53 36225CAZ9 6.5007. 12/20/2026 OR 12/01/96 4,675,643.92 1.45 1,000,000.00 CNRYSLER FINL HTN TR 8 00335 6.514 6.251 A3 100.144 993,160.00 .32 17120QPYL 6.260% 07/20/1998 DO 07/18/95 110011440.00 .31 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 6.519 6.976 AAA 100.343 2,753,437.50 .90 999434418 7.000% IV15/2027 2,759,432.50 .85 3,700,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN TR00324 6.532 8.161 A3 102.623 3,911,640.00 1.24 37042RMS 8.375% OV03/1999 DO 0/03/95 3,797,051.00 1.18 7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 6.535 6.976 AAA 100.345 7,245,203.13 2.38 999ABT444 7.000Y. 01/15/2028 7,274,867.50 2.25 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL WC ASSN HTN 6.577 6.502 AAA 101.891 8,012,576.00 2.67 31364CBD9 6.625% 04/19/2001 DR 04/18/96 8,132,280.00 2.52 2,900,000.00 CNRYSLER FINL MTN TR N 00306 6.591 7.239 A3 100.435 2,952,896.00 .95 17120QNT4 7.270% 04/13/1998 GO 04/13/95 2,912,615.00 .90 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 6.593 B.754 A2 105.669 9,903,780.00 3.12 718154BB2 9.250X OVIS12000 9,510,210.00 2.% 10,00D,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN NiN 6.636 5.741 AAA 98.234 9,593,750.00 3.22 31364BNF3 5.640Z 02/20/2001 DO OV20/96 9,823,400.00 3.04 3,000,000.00 G H A C MED TERM NTS 6.660 8.246 A3 104.591 3,227,070.00 1.03 37042RKQ4 8.6257. 1/20/2000 OD 1/10/95 3,137,730.00 .97 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBS 6.713 6.084 AAA 98.453 4,851,562.50 1.61 3134AONN8 5.990% 03/D6/2001 OD 03/06/96 4,922,650.00 1.52 10,000,000.00 U G TREASURY NOTES 6.756 7.345 AAA 305.516 10,327,343.75 3.46 912827ZM3 07.750% OVIS12001 GO 02/15/91 10,551,600.00 3.27 5,904,721.04 GNMA II POOL 1080088M 6.828 6.853 AAA 102.141 6,033,886.82 1.98 36225CC20 7.0007. 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 6,031,141.12 1.87 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.563 6.471 304,320,456.37 100.00 304,533,650.52 94.28 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF07522202 1997/11/30 RUN DATE : 12/04/97 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 10.52.13 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION B00K YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __-_______ ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL 5.560 6.439 322,049,969.21 100.00 323,066,247.66 100.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -36.00 -36.00 0.000000 NA9123459 12 OCSF0752222 FOR 11/13/97 ----------- -36.00 0.00 0.000000 CW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 TO REVERSE 18-NOV-1997 36.00 36.00 0.000000 NA9123459 ----------- 36.00 0.00 0.000000 CWC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 05-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827Q47 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.750% 06/30/1999 DO 06/30/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 28-NOV-1997 -6.00 -6.00 0.000000 912827R20 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -6.00 0.00 0.000000 Cw 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO O8/31/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 04-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827529 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.750% 11/30/1999 DO 11/30/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 28-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827V25 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 06.250% 08/31/2000 DO O8/31/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 28-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827X49 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.375% 03/31/2001 DO 04/10/96 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM 0PER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 28-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128272TB U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 Cw 06.375% 05/15/2000 DO 05/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 12-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273D2 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO OB/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 13-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273D2 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 28-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273D2 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 04-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827339 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.875% 09/30/2002 DO 09/30/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 04-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273K6 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.625% 10/31/1999 DO 10/31/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 18-NOV-1997 -36.00 -36.00 0.000000 999ABK443 12 OCSF0752222 FOR 11/13/97 ----------- -36.00 0.00 0.000000 CW COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 7.000% 11/15/2027 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 14-NOV-1997 -697.746.00 -697,746.00 99.678000 078157Z50 12/05/1997 14-NOV-1997 697,745.00 697,746.00 99.678000 B LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI)- ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700 000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 14-NOV-1997 -697 746.00 -697,746.00 99.678000 0761SJZSO 12/05/1997 14-NOV-1997 -697:746.00 0.00 99.678000 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 14-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FED FARM CR SK CONS DISC NTS 04-NOV-1997 -299,720.00 -299,720.00 99.906667 -_- - Page 2 OCSG00010D MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BA5E: USD' 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ""----"""'----- -----------------' 313313PB8 MAT 11/10/1997 04-NOV-1997 299,720.00 299,720.00 99.906667 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NTS 04-NOV-1997 -299,72000 -299,720.00 99.906667 313313PBB MAT 11/10/1997 04-NOV-1997 -299,720:00 0.00 99.906667 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 04-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK DISC NTS 07-NOV-1997 -296,808.75 -296,808.75 98.936250 313313RV2 01/15/1998 07-NOV-1997 296,808.75 296,808.75 98.936250 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CR BK DISC NTS 07-NOV-1997 -296,808.75 -296,808.7S 98.936250 313313RV2 01/15/1998 07-NOV-1997 -296,808.75 0.00 98.936250 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 07-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 14-NOV-1997 -2,371,818 00 -2 371,818.00 98.825750 31i385SP2 MAT 02/02/1998 17-NOV-1997 2,371,818:00 2:371,818.00 98.825750 B HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 14-NOV-1997 -2,371,818.00 -2,371,818.00 98.825750 313385SP2 MAT 02/02/1998 17-NOV-1997 -2.371,818.00 0.00 98.825750 FC HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, 17-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 21-NOV-1997 -2,367,926.00 -2,367,926.00 98.663583 313397TH4 MAT 02/20/1998 25-NOV-1997 2,367,926.00 2,367,926.00 98.663583 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 21-NOV-1997 -2,367,926 00 -2,367,926.00 98.663583 M397TH4 MAT 02/20/1998 25-NOV-1997 -2,367,926:00 0.00 98.663583 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 25-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500 000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 03-NOV-1997 -3 496 209.30 -3 496,209.30 99.891694 36459HYA9 11/10/1997 03-NOV-1997 3:496:209.30 3:496,209.30 99.891694 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 3 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USO 01-NOv-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,500.000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 03-NOV-1997 -3,496,209 30 -3,496,209.30 99.891694 36959HYA9 11/10/1997 03-NOV-1997 -3,496,209:30 0.00 99.891694 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 03-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100.000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 13-NOV-1997 -2,076,684.17 -2 076,684.17 98.889722 369597AN3 01/22/1998 13-NOV-1997 2,076,684.17 2:076,684.17 98.889722 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 13-NOV-1997 -2,076,684.17 -2,076,684.17 98.889722 369597AN3 01/22/1998 13-Nov-1997 -2,076,684.17 0.00 98.889722 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-NOV-1997 -3,8S4,866 17 -3 854 866.17 98.842722 369S97AP8 01/23/1998 30-NOV-1997 3,854,866:17 3:854:866.17 98.842722 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-NOV-1997 -3,8S4,866.17 -3,854,866.17 98.842722 369S97AP8 01/23/1998 10-MOV-1997 -3,854,866.17 0.00 98.842722 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 10-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 20-NOV-1997 -6,688,781.22 -6,688,701.22 99.832556 93114AZ16 12/01/1997 20-NOV-1997 6,688,781.22 6,688,781.22 99.832556 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 20-NOV-1997 -6,688,781 22 -6,688,781.22 99.832SS6 93114AZ16 12/01/1997 20-NOV-1997 -6,688,781:22 0.00 99.832556 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 20-NoV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO 7S2.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 03-NOV-1997 -752.00 -7S2.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC II 03-NOV-1997 752.00 752.00 1.000000 B 03-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 260,012.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 03-NOV-1997 -260,012.00 -260,012.00 1.000000 Page 4 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD ' 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 999495906 PUBLIC II 03-NOV-1997 260,012.00 260,012.00 1.000000 B 03-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,191.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 07-NOV-1997 -3,191.00 -3,191.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 07-NOV-1997 3,191.00 3,191.00 1.000000 B 07-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 114,727.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 10-NOV-1997 -114,727.00 -114,727.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 10-NOV-1997 114,727.00 114,727.00 1.000000 B 10-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,254.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 14-NOV-1997 -2,254.00 -2,254.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 14-NOV-1997 2,254.00 2,254.00 1.000000 B 14-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 28.182.00 BSOT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 17-NOV-1997 -28,182.00 -28,182.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 17-NOV-1997 28,182.00 28,182.00 1.000000 B 17-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 912,764.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 17-NOV-1997 -912.764.00 -912,764.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 17-NOV-1997 912,764.00 912,764.00 1.000000 B 17-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 40,625.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 24-NOV-1997 -40,625.00 -40,625.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 24-NOV-1997 40,625.00 40,625.00 1.000000 B 24-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 32,074.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 25-NOV-1997 -32,074.00 -32,074.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC Ii 25-NOV-1997 32,074.00 32,074.00 1.000000 B 25-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 25,861,236.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 26-NOV-1997 -25,861,236.00 -25,861,236.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 26-NOV-1997 25.861,236.00 25,861,236.00 1.000000 B 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 _...... _ Page 5 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE WIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.12 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 03-SEP-1997 -978 243.87 -978,243.87 98.812500 31HFRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/02/97 13-NOv-1997 978:243.87 978,243.87 98.812S00 e GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.12 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 03-SEP-1997 -2,310.00 -2,310.00 98.812500 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 98.812500 xB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.12 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 03-SEP-1997 -980,SS3.87 -980,S53.87 98.812500 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DD 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -980,SS3.87 0.00 98.812500 FC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 990 000.12 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 03-SEP-1997 -978 243.87 -978,243.87 98.812500 3118FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 978:243.87 978,243.87 98.812500 e GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990 000.12 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 03-SEP-1997 -2,310.00 -2,310.00 98.812500 31f8FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 98.812500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.12 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 03-SEP-1997 -980,SS387 -980,5S3.87 98.812500 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -980,553:87 0.00 98.812500 FC GREENWICH 13-NDV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.12 FHLMC GROUP #08-2216 03-SEP-1997 -978,243.87 -978,243.87 98.812500 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DD 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 978,243.87 978,243.87 98.822500 8 GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000D00 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.12 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 03-SEP-1997 -2,310.00 -2,310.00 98.812500 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NDV-1997 0.00 0.00 98.812500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 6 OCSG00100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ __________________ 990,000.12 FHLMC GROUP #DB-2216 03-SEP-1997 -980,553.87 -980,553.87 98.812500 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -980,553.87 0.00 98.812500 PC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 247.500.78 FHLMC GROUP #DS-2216 03-SEP-1997 -244,561.71 -244,561.71 98.812500 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 244,561.71 244,561.71 98.812500 e GREENWICH ----------- 0.0 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2 FHLMC GROUP 2 -57 -57 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027DO 09/01/97 13--NOV-1997 0.00 0.0 98.81250 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.0000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 247,500.78 FHLMC GROUP #DS-2216 03-SEP-1997 -245,139.21 -245,139.21 98.812500 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -245,139.21 0.00 98.812500 FC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.0 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990.000.34 FHLMC GROUP #DS-2833 03-SEP-1997 -978,24409 -978,244.09 98.812500 3128FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-MOV-1997 978,244:09 978,244.09 98.812500 B GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.0 1.000000000 0.0 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990.000.34 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2833 03-SEP-1997 -2,310.00 -2,310.0 98.812500 3128FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.0 98.812500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.0 1.00000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 990,000.34 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2833 03-SEP-1997 -980,554.09 -980,554.09 98.812500 3128FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -980,SS4.09 0.0 98.812500 PC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 460,107.53 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2833 03-SEP-1997 -454,643.75 -454,643.75 98.812500 3128FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-NOV-1997 454,643.75 454,643.75 98.812500 e GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.0 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 460 107.53 FHLMC GROUP #DS-2833 03-SEP-1997 -1,073.58 -1,073.58 98.812500 3DOFSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.0 0.00 98.812500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 7 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ----------------- 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 460 107.53 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2833 03-SEP-1997 -455,717.33 -455,717.33 98.812500 31f8FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -455,717.33 0.00 98.812500 FC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 '0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 853 873.19 FHLMC GROUP #DB-3113 03-SEP-1997 -843,73345 -843,733.4S 98.812500 31HFSN61 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/02/97 13-NOV-1997 843,733:45 843,733.4S 98.812500 B GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 853 873.19 FHLMC GROUP #D8-3113 03-SEP-1997 -1,992.37 -1,992.37 98.812500 3liSFSN61 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-Nov-1997 0.00 0.00 98.812500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 853,873.19 FHLMC GROUP #D8-3113 03-SEP-1997 -845,725.82 -845,725.82 98.812500 3128FSN61 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -845,725.82 0.00 98.812500 FC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 242 689.00 FHLMC GROUP #o8-3924 03-SEP-1997 -239 807.07 -239,807.07 98.812500 31f8FTLD6 7.000% 11/01/2027 DD 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 239:807.07 239,807.07 98.812500 B GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 242,689.00 FHLMC GROUP #D8-3924 03-SEP-1997 -566.27 -566.27 98.812500 3128FTLD6 7.000% 11/01/2027 DD 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 98.812500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 242,689.00 FHLMC GROUP #DS-3924 03-SEP-1997 -240,373.34 -240,373.34 98.812500 3128FTLO6 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -240,373.34 0.00 98.812500 FC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 55,000.00 FHLMC GROUP #D8-4039 03-SEP-1997 -54 346.88 -54,346.88 98.812500 3128FTPY6 7.000% 11/01/2027 DD 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 54:346.88 54,346.88 98.812500 B GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 8 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USO 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR WIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ __________________ S5 000.00 FHLMC GROUP #D8-4039 03-SEP-1997 -128.33 -128.33 98.812500 31f8FTPY6 7.000% 11/01/2027 DD 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 O.DO 98.812500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO SS 000.00 FHLMC GROUP #D8-4039 03-SEP-1997 -54,475.21 -54,475.21 98.812500 31f8FTPY6 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -54,475.21 0.00 98.812500 FC GREENWICH 13-NOV-2997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 136,127.00 FHLMC GROUP #08-4064 03-SEP-1997 -134,510.49 -134,510.49 98.812S00 3128FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 134,510.49 134,S10.49 98.812500 B GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 136 127.00 FHLMC GROUP #D8-4064 03-SEP-1997 -317.63 -317.63 98.812S00 31W8 RO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-MOV-1997 0.00 0.00 98.812500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 136 127.00 FHLMC GROUP #D8-4064 03-SEP-1997 -134,828 12 -134.828.12 98.812S00 3118FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -134,828:12 0.00 98.812500 FC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 692 311.00 FHLMC GROUP #DB-4064 03-SEP-1997 -684 089.81 -684,089.81 98.812500 331PF RO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 684:089.81 684,089.81 98.812500 B GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 692 311 00 FHLMC GROUP #DB-4064 03-SEP-1997 -1,615.39 -1,615.39 98.812500 31HH4 0 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 98.812S00 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 692 311.00 FHLMC GROUP #D8-4064 03-SEP-1997 -68S,70S.20 -68S,705.20 98.812500 31f6F T0RO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -685,705.20 0.00 98.812S00 FC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 529 893.00 FHLMC GROUP #DB-4064 03-SEP-1997 -523,600.52 -S23,600.52 98.812S00 31f8FT0RO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 S23,600.52 523,600.52 98.812500 0 GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 9 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 529,893.00 FHLMC GROUP #D8-4064 03-SEP-1997 -1,236.42 -1,236.42 98.812500 3128FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 98.812500 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 529.893.00 FHLMC GROUP #oB-4064 03-SEP-1997 -524,836.94 -524,836.94 98.812500 3128FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DD 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -S24,836.94 0.00 98.812500 FC GREENNICH 13-Nov-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 03-NOV-1997 -5,000,781.2E -5,000,781.25 100.01562E 31364FFM8 S.880% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 04-NOV-1997 S,000,781.25 S,000,781.25 100.015625 B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 03-NOV-1997 -816.67 -816.67 100.015625 31364FFMB 5.880% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 04-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.01562E IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 03-NOV-1997 -S,001,597.92 -5,001,597.92 100.015625 31364FFM8 5.880% 11/03/1999 DO 11/03/97 04-NOV-1997 -S,001,597.92 0.00 100.015625 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 04-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,400.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -25,825.875.00 -25,825,875.00 IOS.843750 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 26-NOV-1997 25,825,875.00 25,825,875.00 105.843750 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOv-1997 -5S,607.73 -55,607.73 105.843750 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 105.843750 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -25,881,482.73 -25,881,482.73 10S.843750 912827o25 07.500% 11/1S/2001 Do 11/15/91 26-Nov-1997 -25,881,482.73 0.00 105.843750 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 10 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 4,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -4,446.421.85 -4 446,421.85 105,867187 912827D2S 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 26-NOv-1997 4,446,421.85 4:446,421.85 105.867187 B SWISS BANK CORP. NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,200 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOv-1997 -9,S71.8S -9,571.85 105.867187 91f827D25 07.500% ll/15/2001 DD 11/15/91 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 105.867187 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,200,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -4,45S,993.70 -4,455,993.70 105.867187 912827D25 07.500% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/91 26-NOV-1997 -4,4S5,993.70 0.00 105.867187 FC SWISS BANK CORP, NY 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -50,929,687.SO -50,929,687.50 101.859375 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 26-NOV-1997 50,929,687.SO 50,929,687.50 101.859375 B DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE- ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000D00 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -826,139.50 -826,139.50 101.859375 91f B27R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 101.859375 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000ODO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 50,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -51,755,827.00 -51,7SS,827.00 101.859375 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 26-ROV-1997 -51,7S5,827.00 0.00 101.859375 FC DONALDSON. LUFKIN & JENRETTE, 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-MOV-1997 -2 852 062.SO -2,8S2,062.50 101.8S9375 912827R20 06.87S% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 26-NOV-1997 2:852:062.50 2,852,062.50 101.859375 B DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE- ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -46,263.81 -46,263.81 301.8S9375 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 301.85937E is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -2,898,326 31 -2,898,326.31 101.859375 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO 09/32/94 26-Nov-1997 -2,898,326:31 0.00 101.859375 FC DONALDSON, LUFKIN & JENRETTE, 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ ---------------- 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,800 000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 26-NOV-1997 -25,235,066.40 -25,235,066.40 101.754300 91f827R20 06.B75% OB/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 09-IAN-1998 25,235,066.40 25,235,066.40 101.754300 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC. NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 24,800,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-NOV-1997 -617,002.76 -617,002.76 101.754300 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 09-1AN-1998 0.00 0.00 101.754300 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000 00000 U S TREASURY NOTES 16-OCT-1997 -35,594,537.39 -35,594,537.39 100.280200 91NMD2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 10-NOV-1997 -3S,S94,537.39 0.00 100.280200 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP. NY 10-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-NOV-1997 -35,197,120.00 -35 197,120.00 300.563200 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 01-DEC-1997 35,197,120.00 35:197,120.00 100.563200 B BANK OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-NOV-1997 -616,304.35 -616,304.35 100.563200 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.563200 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-NOV-1997 35,197,120.00 35,197,120.00 100.563200 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 01-DEC-1997 -35,197,120.00 -35,197,120.00 100.563200 BC BANK OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-NOV-1997 616,304.35 616,304.35 100.563200 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.563200 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-NOV-1997 -35,197,111.60 -35,197,111.60 100.563176 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 01-DEC-1997 35,197,111.60 35,197,111.60 100.563176 B BANK OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.00000D000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 12 OCSG000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USDA 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ IRV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ __________________ 35,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-NOV-1997 -616,304.35 -616,304.3S 100.S63176 91H273D2 06.000% 08/15/20DO DD 08/1S/97 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.563176 IB ----------- 0.00 O.GO 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3S,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -3S,207,812.SO -35.207,812.50 100.593750 9DS273D2 06.000% 08/1S/2000 OD 08/1S/97 26-NOV-1997 35,207,812.50 35,207,812.SO 100.593750 B HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -S87,771.74 -S87,771.74 100.593750 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.S93750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 -3S,795,584.24 -3S,795,584.24 100.5937SO 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DD 08/15/97 26-NOV-1997 -35,795,584.24 0.00 100.5937SO FC HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1S,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1997 15,051 750 00 15 OS1 7SO.00 100.345000 91i8273K6 05.62S% 10/31/1999 DD 10/31/97 31-OCT-1997 -15,051:750:00 -15:052:750.00 100.345000 SC LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1997 14,981,811.78 14,982,811.78 99.878745 9128273KG 05.625% 10/31/1999 OD 10/31/97 31-OCT-1997 -14,981,811.78 -14,981,811.78 99.878745 BC LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1997 14,981,811.78 14,982,811.78 99.878745 9128273K6 05.625% 10/31/1999 00 10/31/97 31-OCT-1997 14,981,811.78 0.DO 99.878745 FCC LEHMAN BROS INC 31-OCT-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1997 14,981 811 7S 14,981,811.75 99.87874S 91f8273K6 05.625% 10/31/1999 DO 10/31/97 31-OCT-1997 -14,981:821:75 -14,981,811.7E 99.878745 SC LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -15,09182 5 TREASURY NOTES 14,981,811.75 , 14,981,811.7S 99.878745 73K6 OS625% 10/31/ 999 DD 10/31/97 31-OCT-1997 14981811.75 0.00 99.878745 FCC LEHMAN BROS INC 31-OCT-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 ._ _. . . ._.. . . Pape 13 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1S,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1997 -14,981,811.79 -14,981,811.78 99.878745 9128273K6 OS.625% 10/31/1999 DO 10/31/97 31-OC7-1997 14,981,811.78 14,981,811.78 99.878745 B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 15,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 28-OCT-1997 -14,981,811 78 -14,981,811.78 99.878745 9128273K6 05.625% 10/31/1999 DO 10/31/97 31-OCT-1997 -14,981,811:78 0.00 99.878745 FC LERMAN BROS INC 31-OCT-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,OD0.00 COMMIT To PUR FNMA 20-NOV-1997 -9,978,125.00 -9,978,125.00 99.781250 999AA6619 6.170% 01/25/2028 27-IAN-1998 9,978,125.00 9,978,125.00 99.781250 B BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00. LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 03-SEP-1997 9,881,250.00 9,881,250.00 98.812S00 999ABK443 7.000% 11/15/2027 13-NOV-1997 -9,881,250.00 -9,881,250.00 98.812500 BC CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 16-OCT-1997 20,262,500.00 20,262,500.00 101.312500 999ABK443 7.000% 11/15/2027 20-NOV-1997 -20,262,S00.00 -20,262,S00.00 101.312500 BC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 20,000,000.DO COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 16-OCT-1997 -20,262 500.00 -20,262,500.00 101.312500 999ABK443 7.000% 11/15/2027 20-Nov-1997 20,262:500.00 20,262,500.00 101.312500 8 FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 16-OCT-1997 -20,262.500.00 -20.262,500.00 101.312500 999ABK443 7.000% 11/15/2027 20-NOV-1997 -20,262,500.00 0.00 101.312500 FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 20-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 02-ocr-1997 -9,934,375.00 -9,934,375.00 99.343750 999ABQ457 6.080% 11/25/2027 24-NOV-1997 -9,934,375.00 0.00 99.343750 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 14 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USDA 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ 10,000 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 18-NOV-1997 -9,971,875.00 -9,971,875.00 99.718750 994ABT113 6.080% 12/25/2027 23-DEC-1997 9,971,875.00 9,971,875.00 99.718750 B BEAR STEARNS 8 CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 29-OCT-1997 -7,243,203 13 -7 243 203.13 99.906250 999ABT444 7.000% 01/15/2028 14-JAN-1998 7,243,203:13 7:243:203.13 99.906250 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 03-SEP-1997 -2 717,343.75 -2,717,343.75 99.812500 999AB3623 7.000% 11/15/2026 13-NOV-1997 2:717,343.75 2,717,343.75 98.812500 B GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 03-SEP-1997 -2 717,343.75 -2,717,343.75 98.812500 999AB3623 7.000% 11/15/2026 13-NOV-1997 -2:717,343.75 0.00 98.812500 PC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 03-SEP-1997 -7,163,906.25 -7 163 906.25 98.812500 999AB3623 7.000% 11/15/2026 13-NOV-1997 7,163,906.25 7:163:906.25 98.812500 B GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.G0 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 03-SEP-1997 7,163,906.25 7,163,906.25 98.812S00 999AB3623 7.000% 11/15/2026 13-NOV-1997 -7,163,906.25 -7,163,906.25 98.812500 BC GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 05-NOV-1997 -2,753,437.50 -2,753,437.50 100.125000 999434418 7.000% 12/15/2027 11-DEC-1997 2,753,437.50 2,753,437.50 100.125000 B GREENWICH ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PAY UPS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,290.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1997 -17,290.00 -17,290.00 100.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-JUL-1997 17,290.00 17,290.00 100.000000 PU ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,290.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 15-JUL-1997 -17,290.00 -17,290.00 100.000000 Page 15 OCS0000300 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE WIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 9128273AB 3.625% 07/15/2002 DO 07/14/97 15-3UL-1997 -17,290.00 0.00 100.000000 PC 28-NDV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,400,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 26-NOV-1997 4,343,394.00 4,343,394.00 98.713500 63743DACS 01/12/1998 26-NOV-1997 -4,343.394.00 -4.343,394.00 98.713500 S LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI)- ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,400,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 26-NOV-1997 23,747.78 23,747.78 98.713500 637430AC5 01/12/1998 26-Nov-1997 0.00 0.00 98.713500 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,400,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 26-NOV-1997 4,367,141.78 4,367,141.78 98.713500 63743DACS 01/12/1998 26-NOV-1997 4,367,141.78 0.00 98.713S00 PC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 26-NOV-1997 0.00 O.DO 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 UNITED PARCEL SVC DISC 26-NOV-1997 1,472,S00.00 1,472,500.00 98.166667 g1130TzS0 12/OS/1997 26-NOV-1997 -1,472,500.00 -1,472,500.00 98.166667 S MORWN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500 00000 UNITED PARCEL SVC DISC 26-NOV-1997 25,381.25 25,381.2S 98.166667 91HFiSO 12/05/1997 26-NOv-1997 0.00 0.00 98.266667 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.00000DD00 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500 000.00 UNITED PARCEL SVC DISC 26-NOV-1997 1.497,881.25 1,497,881.2E 98.166667 9li3OT250 12/OS/1997 26-NOV-1997 1,497,881.2E 0.00 98.166667 FC MORWN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 6,688,781.21 6,688 781.21 99.832555 93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-Nov-1997 -6,688,781.22 -6,688:781.22 99.832SS5 S MORGAN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME ----------- -0.01 -0.02 2.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-2997 S,942.54 5,942.54 99.832SSS 93114AZ26 12/01/1997 26-NOv-1997 0.00 0.00 99.832555 Page 16 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-Nov-1997 TM10O BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,700,000.00 WAL MART STORES DISC 26-NOV-1997 6,694,723.75 6,694,723.75 99.832S55 93114AZ16 12/01/1997 26-NOv-1997 6,694,723.7S 0.00 99.832S55 PC MORGAN 3 P SECS - FIXED INCOME 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 26-NOV-1997 3,978,000 00 3,978,000.00 99.450000 97665Rz54 12/OS/1997 26-NOV-1997 -3,978,000:00 -3,978,000.00 99.450000 5 MORGAN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 26-Nov-1997 16,350.00 16,3SO.00 99.450000 97665RZ54 12/OS/1997 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 99.450000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,000,000.00 WISCONSIN EL PWR DISC 26-NOV-1997 3,994,3SO.00 3,994,350.00 99.450000 97665RZ54 12/05/1997 26-NOV-1997 3,994,350.00 0.00 99.450000 FC MORGAN I P SECS - FIXED INCOME 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3,755,366.00 BSDT-LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 03-NOV-1997 3,755,366.00 3,755,366.00 1.000000 996087094 VAR RT DD 06/26/1997 03-Nov-1997 -3,7SS,366.00 -3,755,366.00 1.000000 S 03-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -102,425.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 04-NOV-1997 102,425.00 102,425.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC 11 04-NOV-1997 -102,425.00 -102,425.00 1.000000 S 04-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 05-NOV-1997 9.00 9.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC iI OS-NOV-1997 -9.00 -9.00 1.000000 S 05-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 12-NOV-1997 3.00 3.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC II 12-NOV-1997 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S 12-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 17 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -135,708.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 13-NOV-1997 135,708.00 135,708.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 13-NOV-1997 -135,708.00 -135,708.00 1.000000 S 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -36.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 18-NOV-1997 36.00 36.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC II 18-NOV-1997 -36.00 -36.00 1.000000 S 18-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -559,963.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 20-NOV-1997 559,963.00 559,963.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC iI 20-NOV-1997 -559,963.00 -559,963.00 1.000000 S 20-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -25,674,783.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 28-NOV-1997 25,674,783.00 25,674.783.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 28-NOV-1997 -25,674,783.00 -25,674,783.00 1.000000 S 28-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -247,500.78 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 29-OCT-1997 248,022.8S 248,022.8S 100.210937 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -244,561.71 -244,561.71 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 3,461.14 3.461.14 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -247,500.78 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 29-OCT-1997 577.50 577.50 100.210937 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 iS -- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -247 500.78 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 29-OCT-1997 248,600.35 248,600.35 100.210937 31f8FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 248,600.35 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -990,000.12 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 29-OCT-1997 992,088.40 992,088.40 100.210937 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -978,243.87 -978,243.87 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 13,844.53 13,844.53 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -990,000.12 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2216 29-OCT-1997 2.310.00 2,310.00 100.210937 Page 10 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-Nov-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE WIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -990,ODO.12 FHLMC GROUP ID8-2216 29-OCT-1997 994,398.40 994,398.40 100.210937 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 994,398:40 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 O.DO LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -990,0D0.12 FHLMC GROUP ID8-2216 29-OCT-1997 992,088.40 992,088.40 100.210937 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-MOV-1997 -978,243:87 -979,243.87 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 13,844.53 13.844.53 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -990.000.22 FHLMC GROUP I08-2216 29-OCT-1997 2,310.00 2,310.00 100.210937 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DD 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -990,000.12 FHLNC GROUP IDS-2216 29-OCT-1997 994,398.40 994,398.40 100.210937 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 Do 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 994.398.40 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -990,000.12 FHLMC GROUP iD8-2216 29-OCT-1997 992,088.40 992,088.40 100.210937 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DD 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -978,243.87 -978,243.87 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 13,844.53 13,844.53 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -990,000.12 FHLNC GROUP ID8-2216 29-OCT-1997 2,310.00 2,310.00 100.210937 3128FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -990,000.12 FHLMC GROUP ID8-2216 29-OCT-1997 994,398.40 994,398.40 100.210937 3228FRN97 7.000% 09/01/2027 DO 09/01/97 13-NOV-1997 994.398.40 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -990,000.34 FHLMC GROUP iDB-2833 29-OCT-1997 992,088 62 992,088.62 100.210937 3128FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -978.244:09 -978,244.09 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 13,844.53 13,844.53 1.000000000 0.00 - - -- _ _ Page 19 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ RASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB WIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -990 000.34 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2833 29-OCT-1997 2,310.00 2,310.00 100.210937 31f8FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000OODOOO 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -990 OD0.34 FHLMC GROUP ODS-2833 29-OCT-1997 994 398.62 994,398.62 100.210937 31f8FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-MOV-1997 994:398.62 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -460,107.53 FHLMC GROUP OD8-2833 29-OCT-1997 461,078.07 461,078.07 100.210937 3128FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-MOV-1997 -4S4,64375 -4S4 643.75 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 6,434:32 6:434.32 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -460 107.S3 FHLMC GROUP #D8-2833 29-OCT-1997 1,073.58 1,073.58 100.210937 31f8FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DD 10/01/97 13-NDv-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -460 107.S3 FHLMC GROUP /D8-2833 29-OCT-1997 462,1S1.6S 462.151.65 100.210937 31f8FSEE4 7.000% 10/01/2027 DD 10/01/97 13-NOv-1997 462,1S1.6S 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -953.873.19 FHLMC GROUP RD8-3113 29-OCT-1997 855,674.33 855,674.33 100.210937 3128FSN61 7.000% 10/01/2027 DD 10/01/97 13-MOV-1997 -843,733.4S -843,733.45 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 11,940.88 11,940.88 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -853 873.19 FHLMC GROUP 608-3113 29-OCT-1997 1,992.37 2,992.37 100.210937 31f8FSN61 7.000% 10/01/2027 DO 10/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8S3 873.19 FHLMC GROUP OD8-3113 29-OCT-1997 857.666.70 857,666.70 100.210937 31�BFSN61 7.000% 10/01/2027 DD 10/01/97 13-NOV-1997 857,666.70 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -242,689.00 FHLMC GROUP sDB-3924 29-OCT-1997 243,200.92 243,200.92 100.210937 Page 20 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD• 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM1DO BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY IO/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 3128FTLD6 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-ROV-1997 -239,80707 -239,807.07 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 3,393:85 3,393.85 1.000DO0000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -242,689.00 FHLMC GROUP ND8-3924 29-OCT-1997 566.27 566.27 100.210937 3128FTLD6 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -242,689.00 FHLMC GROUP No8-3924 29-OCT-1997 243,767.19 243,767.19 100.210937 3128FTLD6 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/02/97 13-NOV-1997 243,767.19 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,000.00 FHLMC GROUP NDS-4039 29-OCT-1997 55,116.02 55,116.02 100.210937 3128FTPY6 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOv-1997 -54,346.98 -S4,346.88 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 769.14 769.14 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -55,000.00 FHLMC GROUP ND8-4039 29-OCT-1997 128.33 128.33 100.210937 3128FTPY6 7.000% 11/02/2027 Do 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -SS 000.00 FHLMC GROUP Nog-4039 29-OCT-1997 SS,244.3S 55,244.3S 100.210937 31'L8FTPY6 7.000% 11/01/2027 oD 11/01/97 13-MOV-1997 S5,244.3S 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -692 311.00 FHLMC GROUP N08-4064 29-OCT-1997 693,771.34 693,771.34 100.220937 M8FTORO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 21/01/97 13-NOV-1997 -684.089.81 -694089.81 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 9,681.S3 9:681.53 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -692 311.00 FHLMC GROUP ND8-4064 29-OCT-1997 1,615.39 1.615.39 100.210937 31f8FTOR0 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -692,311.00 FHLMC GROUP ND8-4064 29-OCT-1997 695,386.73 69S,386.73 100.210937 3129FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 695,386.73 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 21 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ __________________ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -136,127.00 FHLMC GROUP •D8-4064 29-OCT-1997 136,414.14 136 414.14 100.210937 3129FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-Nov-1997 -134,510.49 -134:510.49 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 1,903.65 1,903.6S 1.00000D000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -136 127.00 FHLMC GROUP #rob-4064 29-ocT-1997 317.63 317.63 100.210937 3118FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-MOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -136,127.00 FHLMC GROUP MD8-4064 29-OC7-1997 236,731.77 136,731.77 100.210937 3128FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DD 11/01/97 13-MOV-1997 136,731.77 0.00 100.210937 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -529,893.00 FHLMC GROUP N08-4064 29-OCT-1997 531 010.74 531 010.74 100.210937 3128FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-MOV-1997 -523:600.52 -523:600.52 100.210937 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 7,410.22 7,410.22 1.OD0000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -529.893.00 FHLMC GROUP 1DB-4064 29-OCT-1997 1,236.42 1,236.42 100.210937 3128FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.210937 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -529,893.00 FHLMC GROUP #D8-4064 29-OCT-1997 532,247.16 532,247.16 100.210937 3128FTQRO 7.000% 11/01/2027 DO 11/01/97 13-NOV-1997 S32,247.16 0.00 100.210937 PC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -S,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-NOV-1997 5,082,421.88 5,082,421.88 101.648437 91f827Q47 06.750% 06/30/1999 DO 06/30/94 04-NOV-1997 -5,019,140.62 -5,019,140.62 101.648437 S LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 63,281:26 63,281.26 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-NOV-1997 116,474.18 116,474.18 101.648437 91f827Q47 06.750% 06/30/1999 DD 06/30/94 04-NOv-1997 0.00 0.00 101.648437 is ----------- 0.00 0.00 I.OD0000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 03-Nov-1997 5,198,896.06 S,198,896.06 101.648437 PB9a 22 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USDA 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 912827Q47 06.750% 06/30/1999 DO 06/30/94 04-NOV-1997 5,198,896.06 0.00 101.649437 PC LEHMAN BROS INC 04-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,800 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-NOV-1997 25,265,000.00 25,265.000.00 101.975000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/2999 DO 08/31/94 26-NOV-1997 -25,261 125.00 -25,261,125.00 101.875000 5 MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 3:875.00 3,875.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,800 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 26-NOV-1997 409,765.19 409,765.19 101.875000 912827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 09/31/94 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 101.875000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,800,000.00 U s TREASURY NOTES 26-NOV-1997 25,674,765 19 25,674,765.19 101.875000 912827R20 06.875% O8/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 26-NOV-1997 25,674,765:19 0.00 101.875000 . FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 2S-NOV-1997 19,234,531.25 19,234,531.25 101.234375 912827v25 06.250% 08/31/2000 DO O8/31/95 26-NOV-1997 -19,258 281.25 -19,258,281.25 102.234375 S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- -23:750.00 -23,750.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -19,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 285,393.65 285,393.65 102.234375 912827V25 06.250% 08/31/2000 DO 08/31/95 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 101.234375 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -19,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 2S-NOV-1997 19,519,924 90 19,519,924.90 101.234375 912827v25 06.250% 08/31/2000 DO O8/31/95 26-NOV-1997 19,519,924:90 0.00 101.234375 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,0912827X49 065375%A03/31/2001 DO 04/10/96 26-NOV-1997 -4,975,781.25 -4,975,781.25 101.718750 S SWISS BANK CORP, NY ----------- 110,156.25 110,156.25 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 49,914.is 49.914.15 101.718750 912827X49 06.375% 03/31/2001 DD 04/10/96 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 101.718750 is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 23 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USO 01-NOv-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 5,135 851 65 5,135,851.6S 101.718750 91f827X49 06.375% 03/31/2001 DO 04/10/96 26-NOV-1997 5,135:851:65 0.00 101.7187SO FC SWISS BANK CORP, NY 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 18,253,125.00 18,253,125.00 101.406250 9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DO 05/15/97 26-NOV-1997 -18,162,178.44 -18,162,178.44 101.406250 S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- 90,946.56 90,946.56 1.D00000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 34,868.79 34,868.79 101.406250 9128272TS 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD OS/15/97 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 101.406250 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,000,000.GO U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 18,287,993.79 18,287,993.79 101.406250 9128272TB 06.37S% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 26-NOv-1997 18,287,993.79 0.00 101.4062SO FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-Nov-1997 3S,207,812.50 3S,207,812.50 100.593750 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/1S/97 10-NOV-1997 -3S,083,247.50 -3S,083 247.50 100.593750 S BANK OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK ----------- 1.24,565.00 124:565.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-NOV-1997 496,467.39 496,467.39 1DO.593750 912827302 06.000% 08/1S/2000 DO OB/1S/97 10-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.593750 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 07-NOV-1997 35,704,279.89 3S,704,279.89 100.5937SO 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DD 08/15/97 10-NOV-1997 3S,704,279.89 0.00 100.593750 FC BANK OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 35,213,281.25 35,213,281.25 100.60937S 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 26-NOV-1997 -35,197,111.60 -35,197,111.60 100.609375 S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC. NY ----------- 26.169.65 16,169.6S 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3S,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 587,771.74 587,771.74 100.609375 Page 24 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USDA 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE WIN LOSS CURR WIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 9128273D2 06.000% 08/1S/2000 Do 08/15/97 26-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 100.60937E Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NDV-1997 35,801.052.99 35,801,052.99 100.609375 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/25/97 26-NDV-1997 3S,801,052.99 0.00 100.609375 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC. NY 26-NDV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 3S,20S,030.00 35,205,030.00 100.585800 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 01-DEC-1997 -35.207,812 50 -3S,207,812.50 100.585800 S HUNG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, ----------- -2,782:50 -2,782.50 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3S,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 25-NOV-1997 616.304.35 616,304.35 100.585800 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DD 08/15/97 01-DEC-1997 0.00 0.00 100.585800 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1S,000,ODO.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-OCT-1997 -1S,001,171.88 -1S,001,171.88 100.007813 9128273K6 05.625% 10/31/1999 Do 10/31/97 31-OCT-1997 1S,OS1,750.00 15,051,750.00 100.007813 SC GREENWICH ----------- 50,578.12 50,578.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1S,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-OCT-2997 -1S,001,171.88 -15,001,271.88 100.007813 9128273K6 05.62S% 10/31/1999 DO 10/31/97 31-OCT-1997 -15,001,171.88 0.00 100.007813 FCC GREENWICH 31-OCT-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -15,000.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-OCT-1997 15,001,171.88 15,001,172.88 100.007813 9128273K6 05.62S% 10/31/1999 DO 10/31/97 31-OCT-1997 -14,981,811 78 -14,981 811.78 100.007813 S GREENWICH ----------- 19,360:10 19:360.10 1.000DD0000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1S,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-OCT-1997 1S,001,171.88 15,001,171.88 100.007813 9128273K6 OS.625% 10/31/1999 DD 10/31/97 31-OCT-1997 15,001,171.88 0.00 100.007813 FC GREENWICH 31-OCT-2997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,250,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC GOLD 29-OCT-1997 -7,265,292 97 -7 26S,292.97 100.210938 999ARK443 7.000% 11/15/2027 13-NOV-1997 7,284,739:58 7:284,739.58 100.210938 SC SALOMON BROS INC. NEW YORK ----------- 19,446.61 19,446.61 1.000000000 0.00 --� Page 25 OCSGUUUIUU MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-2997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,2SO 000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC GOLD 29-ocr-1997 7,265,292.97 7,265.292.97 100.210938 994ASK443 7.000% 11/15/2027 13-NOV-1997 -7,345,156.25 -7,34S,156.25 100.210938 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- -79,863.28 -79,863.28 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,2SO 000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC GOLD 29-OCT-1997 -7,265,292.97 -7,265,292.97 100.210938 994ABK443 7.000% 11/15/2027 13-NOV-1997 7,345,1S6.2S 7,345,156.2E 100.210938 SC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 79,863.28 79,863.28 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC GOLD 17-NOV-1997 20,268,7SO.00 20,268,750.00 101.343750 999ABK443 7.000% 11/15/2027 20-NOV-1997 -20,262,500.00 -20,262,S00.00 101.3437SO S FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 6,250.00 6,250.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000 000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC GOLD 17-NOV-1997 20.268,750.00 20,268,750.00 101.343750 994ABK443 7.000% 11/1S/2027 20-NOV-1997 20,268,7SO.00 0.00 101.3437SO FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 20-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA 18-NOV-1997 9,97S,000.00 9,97S,000.00 99.750000 994ABQ457 6.080% 11/25/2027 24-NOV-1997 -9,934,375.00 -9,934,375.00 99.750000 S BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 40,625.00 40,62S.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000 000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNMA 18-NOV-1997 9,975,000.00 9,97S,000.00 99.750000 994ABQ457 6.080% 11/25/2027 24-NOV-1997 9,975,000.00 0.00 99.750000 FC BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY 24-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000 000.00 COMMIT To PUR FNMA 20-NOV-1997 9,980,468.75 9,980,468.75 99.804688 994ABT113 6.080% 12/25/2027 23-DEC-1997 -9,971,875.00 -9,971,87S.00 99.804688 S BEAR STEARNS & CO INC, NY ----------- 8,593.75 8,593.75 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 05-NOV-1997 2,7S7,949.22 2,757,949.22 100.289063 999AB3623 7.000% 11/15/2026 13-NOV-1997 -2,717,343 75 -2,717,343.75 100.289063 S GREENWICH ----------- 40,605:47 40,60S.47 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,750,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC GOLD 05-NOV-1997 2,757,949.22 2,7S7,949.22 100.289063 Page 26 ul vvuluV MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 999AB3623 7.000% 11/15/2026 13-NOV-1997 2,757,949.22 0.00 100.289063 FC GREENWICH 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -314.457.98 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 15-NOV-1997 314,457.98 314,4S7.98 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-NOV-1997 -313,806.95 -313,806.95 100.000000 PD ----------- 651.03 651.03 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -314,457.98 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 9S-B CL A 1S-NOV-1997 314,457 98 314,457.98 100.000000 161614AE2 5.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 1S-NOV-1997 314,457:98 0.00 100.000000 FC 17-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -97,456.40 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-NOV-1997 97,456.40 97,456.40 100.000000 36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-NOV-1997 -99,070.52 -99,070.52 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,614.12 -1,614.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 97,456.40 GNMA 11 POOL #0080023 01-NOV-1997 -97,456.40 -97,456.40 100.000000 36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-NOV-1997 99.070.52 99,070.52 100.000000 PDC ----------- 1,614.12 1,614.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -97,456.40 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-NOV-1997 97,456.40 97,456.40 100.000000 36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 01-NOV-1997 -99,070.5Z -99,070.52 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,614.12 -1,614.12 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -97,456.40 GNMA II POOL #0080023 01-NOV-1997 97,456.40 97,456.40 100.000000 36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-NOV-1997 97,456.40 0.00 100.000000 FC 20-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -65,020.84 GNMA II POOL #080088M 01-NOV-1997 6S,020.84 65,020.84 100.000000 36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-NOv-1997 -66,443.17 -66,443.17 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,422.33 -1,422.33 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 65,020.84 GNMA II POOL #080088M 01-NoV-1997 -6S,020.84 -65,020.84 100.000000 36225CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1997 66,443.17 66,443.17 100.000000 Page 27 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NoV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ PDC ----------- 1,422.33 1,422.33 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -65,020.84 GNMA II POOL i080088M 01-Nov-1997 65 020.84 65,020.84 100.000000 3622SCC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1997 -66:443 17 -66,443.17 100.000000 PD ----------- -1,422:33 -1,422.33 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -65 020.84 GNMA II POOL S080088M 01-NOV-1997 65,020.84 65,020.84 100.000000 36f25cc20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1997 6S,020.84 0.00 100.000000 PC 20-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -300.000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NTS 10-NOV-1997 299.72000 299,720.00 100.000000 313313PBB MAT 11/10/1997 10-NOV-1997 -299,720:00 -299,720.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 10-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 07-NOV-1997 294,555.00 294,S55.00 100.000000 313385NY8 MAT 11/7/1997 07-NOV-1997 -294,555.00 -294,SSS.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 07-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-NOV-1997 2,350,588 67 2,350,S88.67 100.000000 313385P79 MAT 11/17/1997 17-NOV-1997 -2,350,588:67 -2,350,588.67 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 17-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO -2,400,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG DISC 2S-NOV-1997 2,400,000.00 2,400,000.00 100.000000 313397P54 MAT 11/25/1997 25-Nov-1997 -2,370,370 67 -2,370 370.67 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 25-NOV-1997 29,629:33 29:629.33 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400 000.00 FED HOME LN MTG DISC 25-NOV-1997 -2,400,G00.00 -2,400,000.00 100,000000 31f397PS4 MAT 11/25/1997 25-NOV-1997 2,370,370 67 2,370,370.67 100.000000 MTC 25-NOV-1997 -29,629:33 -29,629.33 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400 000.00 FED HOME LN MTG DISC 25-NOV-1997 2,400,000.00 2,400,000.00 100.000000 311397PS4 MAT 11/25/1997 25-NOV-1997 -2,370,370 67 -2,370 370.67 100.000000 MT 25-NOV-1997 29,629:33 29:629.33 1.000000000 Page 28 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USDA 01-NOV-1997 - 30-NOV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV WIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE WIN LOSS CURB WIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ __________________ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIRCO -3,500,0D0.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-NOV-1997 3.496.209.30 3,496,209.30 100.000000 36959HYA9 11/10/1997 10-NOV-1997 -3,496,209.30 -3,496,209.30 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 10-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 20-NOV-1997 S,844,012.28 5,844,012.28 100.000000 36959HYL5 11/20/1997 20-NOv-1997 -5.944.012.28 -5,844,012.28 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 20-NOv-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DiSC 13-Nov-1997 1,774,28937 1,774,289.37 100.000000 63743CYD9 11/13/1997 13-NOV-1997 -1.774.289:37 -1,774,289.37 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 14-NOV-1997 690,712.75 690,712.75 100.000000 63743CYE7 11/14/1997 14-NOV-1997 -690,712.7S -690,712.75 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 14-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 314,457.98 CHASE MANHATTAN GRAN 95-B CL A 17-NOV-1997 24,556.73 24.556.73 0.000000 161614AE2 S.900% 11/15/2001 DO 11/15/95 15-NOV-1997 24,SS6.73 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 300,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NTS 10-NOV-1997 280.00 290.00 0.000000 313313PBS MAT 11/10/1997 10-NOV-1997 280.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 10-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 07-NOV-1997 5,445.00 5,44S.00 0.000000 31338SNY8 MAT 11/7/1997 07-Nov-1997 5,44S.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 07-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PINCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 17-Nov-1997 49.411.33 49.411.33 0.000000 31338SP19 MAT 11/17/1997 17-NOV-1997 49,411.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-MOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 29 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-NOV-1997 - 30-Nov-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG DISC 25-NOV-1997 29,629.33 29,629.33 0.000000 313397PS4 MAT 11/2S/1997 25-NOV-1997 29,629.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 25-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 FED HOME LN MTG DISC 25-NOV-1997 -29 629.33 -29,629.33 0.000000 313397PS4 MAT 11/25/1997 25-NOV-1997 -29:629.33 0.00 0.000000 ITC 25-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000,000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN TRANCHE #TR 96 10-NOV-1997 59,850.96 59,850.96 0.000000 345402DZI FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 08-Nov-1997 59.850.96 0.00 0.000000 IT 10-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 97 4S640 GNMA II POOL #0080023 20-Nov-1997 25 266.74 25,266.74 0.000000 36f25UZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 01-Nov-1997 25:266.74 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 65 020.84 GNMA II POOL #080088M 20-NOV-1997 34,823.50 34,823.50 0.000000 3612SCC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 01-NOV-1997 34,823.SO 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-Nov-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3,S00,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 10-NOV-1997 3,790.70 3,790.70 0.000000 36959HYA9 11/10/1997 10-NOV-1997 3,790.70 0.00 0.000000 IT 10-NOv-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO S,900,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 20-NOV-1997 55,987.72 55.987.72 0.000000 36959HYLS 11/20/1997 20-NOV-1997 55,987.72 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-Nov-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 13-Nov-1997 25,71063 25,710.63 0.000000 63743CYD9 11/13/1997 13-NOV-1997 25,710:63 0.00 0.000000 IT 13-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 14-Nov-1997 9,287.25 9,297.25 0.000000 Page 30 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USDA O1-NOV-1997 - 30-NDV-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 63743CYE7 11/14/1997 14-NOV-1997 9,287.25 0.00 0.000000 IT 14-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18.000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-NOV-1997 573,750.00 573,750.00 0.000000 9128272T8 06.375% 05/1S/2000 DO 05/15/97 15-NOV-1997 573,750.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,290.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 28-NOV-1997 17,290.00 17,290.00 0.000000 9128273A8 3.625% 07/15/2002 DD 07/14/97 15-JUL-1997 17,290.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 28-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT_LATE MONEY DEP ACCT 03-NOV-1997 102.89 102.89 0.000000 996087094 VAR RT DO 06/26/1997 01-NOV-1997 102.89 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 03-NOV-1997 751.83 751.83 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC Ii 01-NOV-1997 751.83 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 03-NOV-1997 752.68 752.68 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II O1-NOV-1997 752.68 0.00 0.000000 IT 03-NOV-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 31 ,y FAHR COMMITTEE WetlngDate ToXBOS. 17/10/97 IZ117/97 AGENDA REPORT Rem�rNomb He! AGENDA County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Califomla FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Financial Issues between SAWPA and CSDOC (All Districts) (FAHR97-83) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Accept SAWPA's explanation of a sincere difference of interpretation, and waive the interest amounts assessed by staff on the late payments for treatment plant capacity. SUMMARY In 1997, after considerable discussion at both staff and Board levels, a revised agreement was reached with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA). Principally, this agreement changed the terms of additional treatment plant capacity purchases. As of November, SAWPA has paid for its additional capacity in accordance with the agreement. In the meantime, staff assessed interest on our due amounts in an attempt to speed resolution of differences. Staff and General Counsel are now requesting authority to waive that interest assessment which was not clearly required by the agreement. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) w� An=i0...�Mms.wn.awco AHK7a ,. n.., innnv Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION r In 1972, the Districts entered into a 50-year agreement with the Chino Basin Municipal Water District to provide transmission, treatment and disposal for up to 30 mgd of waste brine water from their wastewater treatment facilities. The purpose of this agreement was to provide a means to dispose of the brine waters without impacting the groundwater supply for Orange County. Terms of the agreement included construction of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, a Clean Water Grant funded sewer, and the purchase of capacity in the Joint Works Treatment Facilities. This agreement was later assigned to the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA). After several years of discussion and debate at various levels, the agreements were rewritten, simplified in 1996 and approved by all parties in early 1997. Most of the changes in the new agreement relate to the need and process for SAWPA to acquire additional capacity in the Joint Works Treatment Facilities. At the time of the new agreement, they had paid for only 8 mgd of their potential 30 mgd capacity rights. The agreement required SAWPA to purchase a 9th mgd of capacity concurrent with execution of the agreement, and to purchase additional capacity in 1 mgd increments as required. Invoices were issued in March 1997 for the 9th mgd in the amount of$4,542,847 and for the 10th mgd in the amount of$5,084,942. In April 1997, SAWPA made a payment of approximately 1/10 of the amounts due for each purchase, based upon their interpretation of a 10 year payment option in the agreement. In response to staffs discussion and explanation, SAWPA remitted the balance due on the 9th mgd in August. District and SAWPA staff have met several times since and have agreed upon an interpretation of the payment terms. As of November 3, 1997, SAWPA has paid the full amount of the invoice for the 9th mgd and has paid an amount equal to 1/10 of the total due for the 10th mgd, including interest on an amortized basis. The issue before the Committee is whether or not interest must, or should, be charged for the period between the due date of the invoices and their ultimate payment. The agreement is silent on the issue and does not address how or whether to assess penalties or interest for late payments. Staff did, however, invoice SAWPA for interest in the amount of$899.99 per day for the late payment of the total due for the 9th mgd. SAWPA reports that they have never charged interest to their customers, that they did not cause us to incur any out-of- pocket costs, and that they had a sincere misunderstanding of the payment terms, but that they now have the same understanding as District staff and General Counsel regarding the 10-year payment provisions. In a letter, attached, from the Chairman of the SAWPA Commission, they have acknowledged their new understanding, have apologized for the delay and the misunderstanding and have requested relief from the late payment charge. \Yoftl WIxPCYFIJEIOvw�F/J1HF/JIRYTLIECl/J1R0]89.d,c R....a. IMM Page 2 v Also attached is a memo from General Counsel that indicates in the last paragraph that the Directors could waive the administratively-imposed interest, which is not a term of the agreement, if they so desired without running contrary to the agreement, State law or the State Constitution. Staff recommends that the Directors accept SAWPA's explanation of a sincere difference of interpretation and waive the interest amounts assessed by staff on the late payments. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS 1. Leper from Chairman of SAWPA Commission 2. Memo from General Counsel GGS:lc \VUJWamZwp.JbgnlIIlPcnMFAH qLANq BTBEOFANRBI BA.Es RwW IWM7 Page 3 t Attachment No. 1 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority MMISSION FOR THE PRGJECTAUrHORTry ]NO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT rjgyypA STERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT V BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT November 6, 1997 STERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT NEP LL MANAGER Mr. John Collins, Joint Chair IL M.CLINE County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92728 Dear John, It was a pleasure meeting with you earlier this week to discuss the financial issues between SAWPA and CSDOC. On behalf of the SAWPA Commission I wish to thank you, Peer Swan and Don McIntyre for arranging your schedules to enable Dick Hall and I to proceed with the resolution of this matter. As was dis6ussea, SAWPA has re-examined the provisions of the "new" agreement between our agencies and concurs with your understanding of the terms and conditions involved in the acquisition of additional treatment capacity. Accordingly, we have submitted a check in the amount of$209,104 to account for the difference in the interest payment due to CSDOC for the first year installment of the 10-year plan to acquire the 10'MGD of capacity. SAWPA will immediately remit the second annual installment payment for the 10t°MGD upon receipt of the invoice from CSDOC, anticipated to be on or about April 17, 1998. It is our hope that the initial difference of opinion in the method to calculate the cost of purchasing additional capacity has not harmed the spirit of cooperation we have enjoyed during the effort to produce the"new" agreement. Inasmuch as there was a sincere difference of interpretation of the agreement terms, which resulted in the delay, it is our additional hope that your Board will consider waiving the late payment charge associated with this transaction. If you require additional information or wish to discuss this request, please do not hesitate to contact the SAWPA office. Vefy truly yours, -B�t� 2haieof'otlhe yco(nq,AWPA Commission 11615 Sterling Avenue,Rivemide,CA 9003 . (909)7g5S411 Administration FAX(909)785.7076 • Planning FAX(909)352 3422 I FAHR COMMITTEE mx a TO",015. 1y10/97 10/97 17/17/97 AGENDA REPORT Ite(P. 13 Na her County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: 1997-98 Financing Plan (All Districts) (FAHR97-84) GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION That the Boards of Directors of the individual Districts adopt a formal borrowing and lending program in order to provide for inter-District loans, with interest, while the Strategic Plan is being completed and a long-term financial plan is being prepared. SUMMARY The 1997-98 budget includes a COP issue of$32,300,000 to fund all or part of the budgeted capital improvement program in six of the Districts. Staff now believes there are so many significant financial issues that the Directors will be resolving within the next six months that it would be wise to delay a new COP issue, and for Districts Nos. 1 and 11 to formally borrow from Districts Nos. 2 and 3 until the next COP issue. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY None. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. (Borrowing loan to Districts 1 & 11) ❑ Not applicable (information item) H.M Cb'flML1�MR.9TL WAHR97dlJcc p,,,,,,: 1a1?W Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The 1997-98 budget includes a COP issue of$32,300,000 to fund all or part of the budgeted capital improvement program in six of the Districts as follows: 1 $ 6,300,000 2 9,000,000 3 8,000,000 6 2,000,000 7 3,000,000 11 4,000,000 Total $ 32,300,000 The borrowing was budgeted based upon the cash flow projections considered by the Directors during the 1997 Sewer Service User Fee deliberations, and a desire to comply with the existing "reserves" policy over the next few years without sharp increases and erratic changes in fees. Staff now believes there are so many significant financial issues that the Directors will be resolving within the next six months that it would be wise to delay a new COP issue and for Districts Nos. 1 and 11 to borrow from Districts Nos. 2 and 3. Cash needs during the year will be somewhat less than expected when the budget was prepared. Joint Works capital improvements for the first quarter of the fiscal year are approximately 25% of the annual budget, while the Districts' programs are running at approximately 7%. Operations and maintenance costs for the Districts and the Joint Works are approximately 20% of budget, and expected to rise over the remainder of the year. The Strategic Plan effort is expected to develop preliminary future capital needs in February 1998, and the decision to officially proceed with the Orange County Reclamation Project (now known as the Groundwater Replenishment System [GRS])will not be made until summer of 1998. These two projects need to be completed before we can make a certain budget for capital projects and identify our needs for funds. As you know, he FAHR Committee has begun a study of our Accumulated Funds or"reserves" policy to determine the proper level of funds to have on hand. As a part of this study, Public Financial Management, an independent governmental financial advisor, has conducted a survey of other large public agencies to determine a kind of benchmark for this effort. Additionally, R. W. Beck, an engineering consultant, has developed a computer model to project future capital program requirements for refurbishments and replacements. The Committee saw a preview of the model last month. The PFM report and recommendations will be ready for the Committee to review at their February meeting. This report and other analyses by the Directors could result either in increased funding NmCdc 2a G tn=lPna AHR)FAHR.9P MAHR67dl.Oz R„. M7A7 Page 2 becoming available for current projects, or increased targets for accumulated funds. The Rate Advisory Committee (RAC) has completed most of their work to recommend a revised structure for our Sewer Service User Fees. The FAHR Committee will consider the RAC recommendations as a separate agenda item in December. There are a few remaining items to be resolved regarding the structure, and the rate adoption process needs to be completed. Time needs to be provided for Directors' workshops, for public notification to comply with Proposition 218 requirements, and for the ordinance adoption process. Similarly, the RAC has made recommendations to revise the Districts' connection fee calculations which will impact future cash flow projections. Perhaps some of the funds currently collected as a part of the connection fee will become components of future sewer service user fees. The consolidation of the Districts is currently being reviewed by LAFCO with a goal of implementation on July 1, 1998. This consolidation will have an impact on our existing borrowings, and Bond Counsel has been retained to guide us through the consolidation process. We will be ready to make appropriate changes and to take appropriate action when LAFCO has acted, but do not know all of the issues today, even though we are satisfied that we will be able to comply. While the impacts of consolidation are anticipated to be mainly administrative and housekeeping issues, the nervous investor community will need to be informed and educated. In short, there are many unknowns that remain at this time. In order to go forward with a COP borrowing, we must subject ourselves to the strict evaluations of the Bond Rating Agencies, liquidity providers and financial institutional investors. Staff believes that the significant number of uncertainties and the financial magnitude of these uncertainties would be detrimental to a successful financial review by these parties and could even result in a decreased market for our existing COPS, many of which are resold daily. An alternative method for Districts Nos. 1 and 11 to meet their current cash needs and to maintain prudent reserves would be for those two Districts to borrow in-house from another District. Precedence for such an arrangement is longstanding among the Districts. The Joint Ownership and Construction Agreement which governs the inter-District financial relationships and the annual purchase and sale of Joint Works Facilities provides for payment over a five-year period. A District that implements the long-temt payment provisions is required to pay interest to the other Districts. Districts Nos. 2 and 3 currently have sufficient funds on hand to make a short- term loan to Districts Nos. 1 and 11, if the Directors should so desire. If the Directors want to proceed, staff will prepare agreements for each of the Districts that would include interest at the rate paid by LAIF or earned on our portfolio, and T.YNnV]lAvuMFN111S/J10.BTCECY/JIIm)dlJc Page 3 a would contemplate payment in the next two years from the proceeds of a future COP issue. Such an inter-District arrangement would allow each of the Districts to meet their financial needs for 1997-98 and 1998-99, while all of the uncertainties identified above are resolved. Recommended Action: The FAHR Committee recommend to the Boards of Directors of the individual Districts that a formal borrowing and lending program be adopted in order to provide for inter-District loans, with interest, while the Strategic Plan is being completed and a long-term financial plan is being prepared. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS None. ATTACHMENTS GGS:lc 1YaEWeN2xpE0,N1'II1PcraroIFNIR�PH0.BTCEOFAHflB]b1.E¢ ate. ,on]M] Page 4 ]DINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Mee ng Dace To IL BCs. 121 7/97 AGENDA REPORT [�mNumbe ItrmNumbe 14 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Penny Kyle, Board Secretary SUBJECT: Adoption of Ordinances relative to exemptions, rebates and refunds of sanitary sewer service charges. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Public hearing relative to the following proposed Ordinances of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 13 of Orange County, California, amending ordinances relative to exemptions, rebates and refunds of sanitary sewer service charges: Amending District Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 1 134 133 2 224 223 3 327 326 5 535 516 6 630 629 7 737 736 11 1126 1125 13 1 1319 1 1303 1. Open hearing 2. Verbal report of General Counsel 3. Receive and file written comments, if any 4. Oral public comments, if any 5. Staff response to comments 6. Close hearing SUMMARY District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, and 13 should adopt an ordinance to amend the current ordinance governing sewer service user fees in order to distinguish between rebates and refunds of annual sewer service user fees collected as a separate line item on the annual property tax bill. �veaceaevW em�vs•muev7.am mats nrt:�cvum+a aos Rs.se. irv17n7 Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line Rem: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) At this time it is impossible to determine savings or expenses. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Sanitation District's annual sewer service fees are assessed to each user connected to the sewerage system and are collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill. The fees are calculated for each connected parcel based upon information available from the County Assessors' database. Within a District, all single family residences are charged a uniform fee, and multifamily residences are charged a lesser fee for each unit. Non-residential users are assessed a fee based upon the square footage of the developed building area on each parcel. The actual type or amount of sewerage system use at a commercialtiindustrial building is not a factor in the annual fee collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill. This fee is the same per 1,000 square feet of development for every non-residential user in the District. However, there are approximately 1,000 users who are issued a permit by our Source Control Division, whose fees are established based upon actual quantities and strength of flow discharged to the sewerage system. These users are commonly termed Class I and Class II users in reference to the type of permit issued. Class I users are generally those who are subject to Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards, and have a daily discharge exceeding 25,000 gallons. Class 11 users are high volume users whose discharge includes other than sanitary waste, but who are not subject to a Class I permit. It should also be noted that one of the recommendations coming forward from the Rate Advisory Committee, formed as a part of the Strategic Plan effort, will be a change to more than 20 categories of non-residential users. This increase in categories is expected to result in assumed quantity and strength by category that more closely approximates the actual, and in charges that are more appropriate for each category of user. \VevE W atlM.Eh1.Y+^�. BB)biM e.w M.DEMern .a« R� ,W„m Page 2 V In the meantime, the current District fee ordinances each provide for adjustments to the calculated fees in the event the property owner/user can prove an inequity exists between the fee assessed and the amount of wastewater discharged. Such inequities may include, but are not limited to, the following instances: A. The owner's parcel is not connected to a sewer; B. The use of the parcel differs from the indicated use; C. The principal water use is agricultural; D. Any other use, wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. Determination of any adjustments, rebates or refunds is vested in the General Manager of the District, or his designee. The Finance Director and staff have been administering this program with the guidance of the General Counsel. Because the fees are collected on the property tax bill, the Government Code specifies that refunds must be granted for up to the four-year period preceding the refund request. Even though the Districts' rates and rate structure had not changed in several years, the Districts experienced a significant increase in the number and amount of adjustment requests during 1996-97. This increase can be primarily attributed to an influx of consultants. The consulting firms mail a letter to businesses in the county proposing they can lower their sewer service fees based upon their understanding and knowledge of our Ordinance. Typically, the consultant is paid a percentage of the reductions. A table showing the adjustments granted during each of the past four years follows. The amounts indicated for each fiscal year are the total adjustments and may include amounts charged in the prior four years. Also reported is the percentage of adjustments granted during the year to the total assessment for the year. Fiscal Year Adiustment Percentage 1993-94 $ 170,011 .3% 1994-95 59,039 .1% 1995-96 364,741 .6% 1996-97 7,514,456 12.4% There were approximately 750 adjustments made during fiscal 1996-97, most of them were for the maximum four-year period. One might expect that the adjustment per user would decline in the future as those with the most to request should have been the earliest to be processed and their four year window has been adjusted. Not surprisingly, not one user or consultant has notified staff that the average cost charged on their property tax bill was below the proper charge for their discharge. NWQN6b2 ftE gMWIW1Y MBa,HM ECYm14UK R„ 1W7W Page 'v In response to staffs concerns and requests, General Counsel has re-reviewed the applicable Government Code. This month, General Counsel has issued an opinion that distinguishes between a "rebate" and a "refund". In essence, the difference is that a "refund" is due in the case of a billing error, such as billing a parcel that had no sewer service, while a "rebate" is due when the sewer use has been inappropriately determined. The significance of this opinion is that only the refund requests are allowed for four-years; rebate requests are allowed only during whatever time period is specified in the Districts' enabling ordinance. General Counsel has ruled that a sewer service user fee assessed in accordance with the adopted ordinance based upon the building square footage carried in the County Assessor's database is only a billing error if the square footage is incorrect, if the parcel is undeveloped or unsewered or if the use is not non- residential. This means that sewer service user fee adjustments requested on the basis of water use are not required for the four-year period, but rather for the shorter period established by District Ordinance. Because this ruling results in a change in the past practices, General Counsel and staff are requesting that the ordinances be modified to clearly distinguish between rebates and refunds and to define the adjustment period for both. Because this revision is in the form of an ordinance, it will require two readings and a published public notice. The revised adjustment period will be effective for all requests received after January 1, 1998, the effective date of the revised ordinance. ALTERNATIVES CEQA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS Proposed ordinance /pk N®eiasaM.�W�mn ur5DE u.eoc Rw„ IW7M7 Page 4 1 ORDINANCE NO. 134 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 133 RELATING TO EXEMPTIONS, REBATES AND REFUNDS OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN as follows: Section 1: Section 5 of Ordinance No. 133 is hereby amended to read as follows: 'Section : A. Exemptions. It is the intent of the District that the legal owner(s) of parcels of real property, otherwise subject to the levy and payment of the sewer use charges as prescribed herein, be relieved, in whole or in part, from the payment of said charges, in certain circumstances and under conditions proscribed herein, and be entitled to either a rebate or a refund with respect to charges paid, as more specifically set forth in Subparagraphs B and C below, provided an inequity is established or a billing error is proven, as specked in Subparagraph B or C. B. Application for Rebate. Any property owner may apply to the District for a rebate of sewer use charges paid to the District by establishing that an unfair valuation of the property has been made by the District. An applicant for a rebate must 1 1V establish, by proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that an inequity exists between the amount of the charge paid and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system, resulting in an unfair valuation. Satisfactory proof shall establish that either: (1) The principal water use is agricultural or horticultural; or (2) The property is devoted to any other use wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. Satisfactory proof shall include, but not be limited to, documentation showing actual water usage for each billing cycle during the entire period for which the rebate is sought. The amount of any rebate shall not reduce the charge payable by any property owner, whose property is connected to District's system, to less than the single family residential charge shown on Table A. An application for a rebate shall be deemed a claim and be governed by the provisions of California Government Code Sections 935 et seq., and shall be presented to the District, 2 y as provided in the Government Tort Claims Act, Government Code Sections 915 at seq., not later than one (1) year after the mailing of the property tax bill by the County Tax Collector, and the claim for rebate may only be made with respect to amounts paid or payable under such property tax bill. A claim for rebate under this Subparagraph is not deemed a claim for refund, and California Revenue &Taxation Code Sections 5096 and 5097 are not applicable. C. Application for Refund. Any property owner may apply to the District for a refund of sewer use charges paid to the District by establishing that the amount paid was pursuant to an error in the amount billed or the amount paid. The applicant for a refund must submit proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that a billing error has been made by the District, or the County Tax Collector. Such proof shall include, but not be limited to, proof that: (1) The owner's parcel of property is not connected to the District's system; or (2) The property has not been classified in the proper land use category; or (3) A clerical error has been made. Applications for refunds are governed by the provisions of 3 b California Revenue &Taxation Code Sections 5096 and 5097, allowing for refunds for a period of four (4) years from the date of payment of the second installment of the bill claimed to be incorrect. D. Determination. All applications for rebates or refunds of the sewer use charge will be determined by the General Manager of the District, or his designee, who, based on the submitted proof, may grant a full or partial rebate or refund. E. Administrative Fee. At the time of filing the application for rebate or refund, the property owner shall pay District an administrative fee for the processing of such application. The amount of the fee shall be an amount established by District's Director of Finance from time to time, which amount shall not be less than $15.00." Section 2: Section 7 of Ordinance No. 133 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 7. Method of Collection. A. Pursuant to the authority granted by California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, and except as otherwise provided in Subparagraph B below, all charges established herein shall be collected on the County Tax Roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with, and not 4 Y separately from, its general taxes. The County Tax Collector is authorized and hereby ordered to make said collections in accordance with the terms and conditions of agreements between the County of Orange and the District. B. In the event District determines that, due to billing or payment error, or to inequity in the amount billed, a property owner has underpaid annual sanitary sewer service charges payable to District, District, within four (4) years after the date of mailing of the tax bill, in the case of billing or payment error, or within one (1) year after the date of mailing of the tax bill, in the case of billing inequity, may: (1) collect the amount of any deficiency directly on the County Tax Roll; (2) off-set the amount of any deficiency against any amounts that District determines is owing, by District, to the property owner, as a rebate or refund under this Ordinance; or (3) submit, directly to the property owner, a bill for the amount of any deficiency, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the invoice date and which, if not paid, shall become a lien on said property.' 5 Y Section 3: Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by order of court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances shall not be affected, Section 4: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on January 16, 1998. Section 5: Certification. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary of the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District, as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held December 17, 1997. Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California 6 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEE MEETING OF DISTRICT NO. 2 Wednesday. December 3. 1997 at 4,00 p.m. A meeting of the Selection Committee of the County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California was held on December 3, 1997, at 4:00 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present: Staff Present: Norman Z. Eckenrode David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Mark A. Murphy Andrei loan, Engineer APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR Mark Murphy was appointed as Chair for the Selection Committee Meeting of December 3, 1997. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering made a presentation of the project, Consultant's familiarity with the project, and explained the scope of work and why the project implementation is a critical safety issue. He then presented the project budget and schedule, and requested that Holmes& Narver be sole- sourced to provide engineering services. ACTION ITEM Receive and file Selection Committee certification and approve Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver to design and prepare the construction documents for Replacement of Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate, Contract No. 2-40, in an amount not to exceed $54,981, DISCUSSION: The Selection Committee asked routine questions about the project budget and consultant's ability to perform the work. The Section Committee expressed support for the project. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. Minutes of the Selection Committee of County Sanitation District No. 2 Page 2 December 3, 1997 CLOSED SESSION There was no dosed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS, OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m. Submitted by: & Gail Cain Selection Committee Secretary :gc H1V/p,OT/JENni pA�i]4pgLCOM.N.M i ]DINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS /.q/10199 "`mNb' 12417/97 AGENDA REPORT IS, rj IMMNumty County Sanitation Districts of Ora unty,California FROM: David Director of Engineering Prepared by: Andrei loan, Engineer SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONTROL GATE, CONTRACT NO. 2-40 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Selection Committee certification and approve Professional Services Agreement with Holmes& Narver to design and prepare the construction documents for Replacement of Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate, Contract No. 2-40, in an amount not to exceed $54,981,00. SUMMARY The SARI line is in part located in the Santa Ana riverbed. The pipeline and manholes could fail in an extraordinary flood event. Such failure would allow send,sill and debris into the pipe, and eventually into the headworks at Plant No. 1. The emergency shut off gate will protect Plant 1 from becoming inoperable due to a catastrophic pipeline failure. As presented in Attachment No. 1, Staff recommends that Holmes&Narver be sole-sourced to perform the engineering services due to the need to fast track the project and due to the extensive project knowledge of H&N. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Refer to the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item:No.6,District 2,C.L/Reliability) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable(information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI),one of District No. 2's trunk sewer lines,generally parallels the Santa Ana River from the Orange/San Bernardino County line to Plant 1,a distance of approximately 23 miles.The SARI line extending east from the Weir Canyon Road to the OC/SBD County line runs mostly within the Santa Ana River Ooodplain and crosses the river bottom at several locations. The SARI line also serves Riverside and San Bernardino Counties under the administration of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA). SAWPA owns a peak capacity right of 30 mgd in the SARI line downstream of the San Bemardino/Orange County line. HM Nknp1ENGVJOSJO AR J nl BW 12.1791.E¢ Rwr.el. 110 W Page 1 1 When the SARI line was constructed in 1976, it was buried about 15 to 20 feet below the then existing riverbed elevation, assuming that the depth would be adequate to avoid any damage to the pipeline from future riverbed degradation. In addition, it was anticipated that surface access could be sustained to manhole structures spaced at regular Intervals for ordinary Inspection and maintenance. However,within the Santa Ana River floodplain,the SARI line easement is vulnerable to damage caused by Flooding and riverbed erosion. Streambed degradation over a period of 20 years is now posing a threat of structural damage to the pipeline and access to the manholes has become difficult due to heavy growth of riparian habitat. An extensive scour analysis was performed in 1996 to determine the potential extent of damages to the SARI line under a major Flood event. Holmes&Narver prepared the report under Contract No.2-14-5R2.The report indicates that the Santa Ana riverbed has degraded by about six to eight feet due to flooding and entrapment of sediment in the Prado Dam Reservoir located just northeast of the OC/SBD County line. Consequently,there has been significant scour near the manholes and the depth of cover over the pipeline has been reduced to about five to six feet at several pipe crossing locations. In addition,significant erosion will occur when flows up to 30,000 cfs will be released from the dam after the dam is raised by the Corps of Engineers. According to the report,the SARI line will be washed out at several locations and some manholes will be completely exposed and very likely destroyed.Any damage to manholes would allow a devastating Influx of sand and debris into the SARI line with partially destructive consequences to CSDOC Plant No. 1. The large amount of sift, and debris that could enter the SARI line (n case of a washout)would induce a significant blockage at the headworks large enough to potentially render Plant No. 1 inoperable for days. An emergency shut off gate was designed and built in 1981 under Contract No.2-14-4B.The gate provides a location to shut off the flow in the SARI line in the event of a catastrophic failure of the pipeline in the riverbed and thereby protecting the downstream sewer and Plant No 1 from potential damage or failure. The existing facility consists of a manually operated sluice gate located between La Palma Avenue and the Santa Ana River,downstream of Weir Canyon Road.The shut off gate structure is located in a depressed area and will be submerged under severe good conditions. The access road to the structure will also be flooded,thus making the shut off gate inaccessible for operation when needed. CSDOC maintenance staff have expressed concerns regarding the ability to reopen the gate after an emergency closure. Consequently, it Is critical that the emergency shut off gate structure be relocated and improved,to provide for better accessibility, proper operation and maintenance under flood conditions, and ultimately to provide the necessary protection to Plant No. 1. The scour analysis report Indicates two alternatives to mitigate the risk of the SARI pipeline washout.One of them is to relocate the SARI line outside of the riverbed. Contract 2-41 will examine in detail the adequacy and feasibility of the pipeline relocation. Contract 2-41 is scheduled to begin in January 1998 and to be completed at the end of 2001, Including the design and construction of the relocated and/or protected SARI line. The SARI line relocation project,If deemed feasible,will take three years or longer to complete. In the meantime the assured operation at Plant 1 is. The urgency of this relocation project derives from the fact that Plant 1 may have to be completely shut down if there is a blockage at the headworks. Therefore it is critical to complete the shut off gale structure relocation as soon as possible.The project is scheduled to be designed and built on an aggressive schedule, such that completion will be before the end of calendar year 1998 and before the winter 1998-1999 rainy season. HM pbbnplFNGI$Jp.]Jll AR J Ml Qq 12.17b70x R.,. 11R1.7 Page 2 y ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS It is planned for a mitigated Negative Declaration relative to CEQ4 to be done during the design and before the project reaches construction. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Staff Evaluation 3. RFP 4. Consultant's Proposal 5. Certification Letter Al:jmf H\w9.EY BWN6\]<Q Mbima 12-11.91Az H"ft*nq�MJ a®N.12.1Wb Rwe.a. 11R4 Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Replacement of Santa Ana Interceptor Control Gate, Contract 240 BUDGET CURRENTFY FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED TASK (ADOPTED BY (1997-1988) AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE TO F DISTRICTS CIP) BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORFUNDS D TO DATE DATE(%) FUNDS CONSULTANT $ 60,000 $ 55,000 $ - $ 54,981 $ 54,981 $ 0.00% STAFF $ 55,000 $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,019 $ 20.019 $ 2,000 9.99% CONTRACTOR $ 235,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 350,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ 75,000 $ 76,000 $ 2,000 1 2.67% 1W W WelNlepmbnplENGI'11Ni0M bIN BamN 12 IW U rzmuW. 11Ra91 4 STAFF EVALUATION PROPOSAL TO PERFORM CONSULTING SERVICES FOR REPLACEMENT OF SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONTROL GATE, CONTRACT NO. 2-40 In November 1996, Holmes & Narver(H&N) prepared an extensive study of the SARI line, upstream of the existing emergency shut off gate structure. The study was commissioned by the County Sanitation District No.2 of Orange County (CSD2) under Contract No. 2-15-5R2. By successfully completing this study, H&N acquired an invaluable amount of local expertise focused on the Santa Ana River in the proposed project area. This virtually eliminates the "learning curve" associated with any engineering project. H&N has extensive related experience with other projects on the Santa Ana River such as the design of two inflatable rubber dams for the Orange County Water District (OCWD), diversion gates, bypass channels and metering devices at each dam location. The combined project cost is on the order of$5 million for construction. The H&N Team assisted OCWD with Section 404 and 1601 permits. Similar permits will be required for the construction of the emergency shut off valve structure. The H&N recent experience with the permitting process will help expedite the project completion before the rainy season of 1998-1999. H&N has the ability to add to their design team the services of Mr. Carl Nelson, who has more than 36 years of public works experience in Southern California and held the position of Director of Public Works for the County of Orange/EMA for 14 years. He was responsible for the planning, scheduling, design, construction, operations and maintenance of all County-funded flood control and drainage facilities. Mr. Nelson worked with numerous cities and special districts during his County career while implementing projects. He has directed the design and construction of dozens of flood control and water conservation facilities. Mr. Nelson's background highly qualifies him to assist CSD2 with meetings and presentations to SAWPA and all other agencies such as California Fish & Game, U.S. Fish &Wildlife, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Orange County Public Works with respect to funding or regulatory approvals. Because of the need to fast track the project together with the superior qualifications of H&N, CSDOC staff recommends that Holmes & Narver be sole- sourced to perform the engineering services for Contract No. 2-40, for an amount not to exceed $54,981. AI:jee H:4P.dweng)ENm2401Agenda Attachment i.doc 1 y COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA v October 2, 1997 prc)ssazan C.T. Bathala, PhD, P.E. magmg aEOr Director, Water Resources P.O.Bev 6127 Holmes & Narver .,h Vaneµ G 9272RB127 999 Town & Country Road aeea[aeenax Orange, CA92668 )Boa Eft.k . w'tan sz 677018 7 SUBJECT: Replacement of Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate Structure, Contract No. 2-40 Membav The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) is in process fast Agenan 0 tracking the design of an emergency shut-off valve /gate, structure on the u ea SARI line, in the Santa Ana River. Holmes & Narver is hereby invited to submit a proposal to perform engineering services for the subject project. snana�n area BYana vast PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK: CYprxas sam Vellaµ rVfe• h Task 1. Prepare plans, specifications, bid schedule and a cost estimate n>ngron Beach bane for bidding and construction of the proposed emergency shutoff valve/gate La Habra structure and necessary access/maintenance road. The plans and La pmna ras aamaaa specifications shall be submitted at 25%, 50%, 85% and 100% level of vawpar[Beach completion with cost estimates at each phase. The preliminary design will prcance show the valve/gate at approximately SARI line station 1031+00 (+/-)• Plans sa"ra one to include limits of excavation, shoringif reinforced concrete sear Beach i necessa ry, smnmh vault, piping, valve or gate details, construction phasing with bypassing, if v-,7 art needed, possible flow meter, and valve or gate motor, operator and electrical mrba undo panel, transformer, MCC and/or other details. Identify Governing Agencies rrcy of Ovange which have jurisdiction in the area and which have to issue permits. Identify the need and requirements for permanent and temporary (construction) tiry of v c.a easements. Prepare all necessary legal descriptions, exhibits and mare Masa applications for easement acquisition. CSDOC will process the documents Ba,vah swa and obtain the easements. M aW.'OL, a.ev am cca Task 2. Prepare soil/geotechnical investigation report pertinent to the I .a Reach site selected for the new structure. The depth of the borings shall exceed the depth of the structure by at least six (6) feet. i n..aNe :Ws:e.:xe-:_e r.. ......,...�, grenar—...�.1-::_. ^.:ae^e-.:ae:..�..�r_:..�__p..�...;p •ag,: p C.T. Bathala, PhD, P.E. Page 2 October 2, 1997 Task 3. Design of electrical /mechanical systems to support valve I gate remote control operation from Plant No. 1. Address valve/gate shut off and opening procedure under power failure conditions. Address the installation of possible flow meter electronics, and telemetry for remotely sending all information, status and alarms to main SCADA monitoring computer at plant no. 1. Task 4. Assist CSDOC with meetings and presentations to SAWPA and all other agencies such as Calif. Fish & Game, U.S. Fish & Wildlife, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Orange County Public Works with respect to funding or regulatory approvals. It is assumed that there will be four meetings. Apply 'for permits on CSDOC behalf and assist CSDOC in obtaining required permits from Governing Agencies. Task S. Assist CSDOC with pre-bid meetings, requests for information, review of bidder's proposals and construction contract support to include consultation, review of shop drawings and submittals for all portions of the construction contract phase. Task 6. Produce a record set of drawings from "As-built" drawings delivered from CSDOC inspection/construction management staff. Produce an "Operations and Maintenance" manual with written procedures for all phases of operations and maintenance of proposed facility. Also include descriptions of the equipment and system mode of operation. Please submit your proposal by October 8, 1997 at the CSDOC Administrative Offices, 10844 Ellis Avenue. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Andrei loan at (714) 662-2411. e nsion 5064. David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering DAL/Al:je H:w. may nga72Noam2-40 SARI Gate\GATE REPL 2-40 SCOPEDOC " M Holmes & Hamer October 7, 1997 _ Mr. David A. Ludwin,P.E. Director of Engineering County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR REPLACEMENT OF SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONTROL GATE STRUCTURE,CONTRACT NO.2-40 Dear Mr. Ludwin: Per your letter dated October 2, 1997 to Mr. C. T. Bathala, we are pleased to present the following fee proposal for professional services to be rendered in accordance with the Scope of Work described in your letter. Engineering/Consulting Services at our direct labor hourly rates plus 166%overhead ......................................... S45,856.00 ProfitQ 9.65%............................................................................ S 4,425.00 Travel, repro, telephone,etc. .................................................... S 300.00 Geotechnical Subcontractor......................................................... S 4,400.00 TOTAL CONTRACT $54,981.00 Our fee is based on the attached Billing Rate Schedule and Fee Estimate tables. Please note our geotechnical subcontractor has not included any services during the construction phase. If services are required,they will provide a budget estimate once the design is complete and the construction schedule is known. It has been a pleasure providing our professional services on the Phase I of the SARIS Project and we look forward to working with you on this new contract. Sincerely, C. Michael Ofenstein, P. E. Vice President Enclosures Pas;Office Box 6240, Orange.CA 92262-6240 999 Tmn d Country Road.Orange.CA 92668-4726 Fez 17141967=3=1 (714)567-24C- F:\usmW 190\bathla\sarMWI.doc COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ; 6 December 3, 1997 Phone: (7141962 411 Board of Directors n,.nbq amass.: County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County o r° Pam' 'Wayy.M 10844 Ellis Avenue 9272"127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 epee[eddr aes: 1rb�m4°w,cn Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for the Professional Services 997o 701e Agreement with Holmes & Narver in Connection with Replacement of Santa Ana River Interceptor Control Gate, Contract No. 240 "tubs' In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional Agnnoa. 0 engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee owes for the Professional Service Agreement with Holmes & Narver, providing the engineering services in connection with Replacement of Santa Ana River Anthem "ere. Interceptor Control Gate, Contract No. 240, on an hourly rate basis including Beans P.rt labor plus overhead, plus subconsultants' fees and fixed profit, in an amount not q'rely P.anrbin Valley to exceed $54,981. rwerton Handngcon Beach Irvine Professional LA Hebre Services La Pelm. Los Alanhass Agreement Ne"or,Beech Placeeue Engineering/Consulting Services at our direct labor sent.An° hour) rates plus ................. SanSAW Beach y P ..................................$45,856.00 8 amm� Nsen Ylla Pero Profit @ 9.65%...............................................................................5 4,425.00 Yore. Linde ca..t, of ors., Travel, repro, telephone, etc...........................................................$ 300.00 son", Districts Geotechnical Subcontractor...........................................................$ 4,400.00 coscrs ce een TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed $54,981.00 Mibwa,Cdy Water Olatricts lMha Ranch A Public WescA.cer and Environmental Management Agency Committed ch Protecting the Environment Since 1954 Board of Directors District No. 2 Page 2 December 3, 1997 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for services to be performed, and that the said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Norman Z. enrod Chair, Disttict No. 2 Selection Committee 1 K Me A. Murphy Vic -Chair, District No. 2 Selec ' Committee David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering DAUAI:je \Vead`Gah2hxp.dta%engTNG\7AMeWdt on Commillae U dw MEETING DATE: D6Dembw 17, 1997 TBm 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS: 1, 2, 3, 6, 6. 7. 11, 13 & 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (LDrzI (PEAXY.I............ . ...... ...MC ........ DDIDAN.....»..»........ MOWBERO)....................ADERSON........................_ dORBYI................... .....&WKHUD. ........... (WONTZI... ................. mRRY...................... ((EYES)...........................BROADWATER........... ImiW)...... SALTAREW.........»....... (FORSYTHE).... ..............MMWN. .................. R IPETRIKMI. ».......... COLDS...........(SWINE".................... ........ — — = MOYESI........................DERAY.................._.». — DMTRICT 2 IBEW..................».........DFNF3.............»........... 11MFATZWEMM.............ECKENRODE.................. ✓ MAIUAAHI......_...............DFTILOPF........»....»..... — I COONm........................MIIRRIY................0.4...... OOTSONI........................DONAHUE................. ....fa,c — MOLAUIERO)....................ANOER40N.................. ISIMONOFFl.....................WNUP.............4.........� MORSYI..........................MNKXUD.............. IMAERTLWEIIHB.............ECKIMRODE................. JG — IIEYES)...........................BROADWAIBi..............L IPENXYI...........................FERIIYMA ...................JC IPETRIKIN).......................COWNS.......................� /L ICAAMHtt........»............JBIIES..... TAI(t/.I..... — IBELL).............................DENES.......................... f8110ADWA19U...............LEYES............ — (SIMONOFFT..................... II DUNLAP....................... .�J. ! MAULLEM......................MARSHALL........»... .� WRI . MAUIOAN.......... IWm...........................MC OUIOAN.....» IWALREAI........................MMOR ADFD»...»..». R.... ISTINR ........................ T CHWMOI......................WEDAA.......................L — — IDOONm........................MURRiY............._........JG IDALYI............................ZEMMEL..........................JL (DE3AYI...................4......NOYES..........0.......... ..._ — (PARIS)............................RILE..................»..0...... — DISTRICT3 (POTTER...........................SALTARELL.................. _ IPARIEI............................RIDE............................ (WEDAAI....................._..MMWIHO.......0............. — IWALKER)........................MINER BRADFORD......... IMAMMONDI....................SHFA................»......... — MOLMBEROI....................ANDERSON................... STEINERI.........................SPITZER..............».......spn — MORIM..........................SANKHUD................... :HAR RI........................STFWEA ..................... — IFORSYTIEI.....................BROWN........................ IXARMANI.......................BULINAN..................... — IPETRIXINI.......................DOWNS....................... MULLEAI...............»_.......SWAM............ ..»..»».... — (DOWON)........................DONAHUE...................... (JEMPSA).................4.4....mm...4.................... — (SIMONOFF)....................:DUNUP.Lr................... (SCHWINOI......................WEDM..............»........ (CARFIOW......................i1d163.../.>SR/ABAI�...... IDALYI............4..............ZEMEL..............._....».. _ (BROAD WATEAI...............LEVIES.......................... IMAULLEIV......................MARSXALL................... STAFF ILUTZI.............................MCOUIOAN................... . (STEINER)........................SRfZER....................... MARMAI)......................WLLWAN..................... ANDERSON......�............ � U WEMPSAI........................6YLVM........................ DAHL........4................... (DALYI............................ZEIAEL.......................... HOD .....»................ KYLE................»................. �Y�'`� DISTRICT 6 LUDWImcMT E.......................... INOYESI..........................OBAY........_4............... ✓ MCd N..... ............»....... ���.�(����"��� IYRE DEBAVI.........................:NOYE6.......................»^ OOTENIAN................».... ISPITZ01)........................SWIM...I...............»»� PETERMAN......................— DISTRICT6 WON AN....................... . (PERRY)...........................FIMNA I.....».........». WHEATLEY:.....................�C ISPRZERI......_.».............STEMER....................... ....................................— MOWS)...... ................OFBIIY.............4........... ...................................... ......................................_ ......................................_ DISTRICT 7 IPOTTSI..........................SALTAREW.................. OTHERSNANUVI MAMMONDI....................SHU........................... MOM)..........................DEBAY......................... WOODRUFF..................»y. IPERRYI...........................FFRRYIMN................... ANORUB........................ ._ ILURI...........»................MCGUIOAN................. KNOW....... ......... ICOONrzI........................MURNW....................... LEE.............................. ...— (SPITZER)........................STERNER.......................JL LMDSTROM..............»..... NIKON.............................— DISTRICT11 SHAW.............».».....»...._ MARMANI.......................OETROFF................:_.. sTONE............................ IMARMANI.......................SULLIVAN..................... ISTEINERR........................SPITZER...................... — DISTRICT 13(SMION EDA ///fff ��� (WDFFI.....................DUNUP....................... = 1SSFDAA).........................S )REND..................... IPTR MINER........................ ER....................... (DOONiZI......_................MLNUMY....................... DISTRICT 14 MAMMONDI...... ....... .......SHEA—.........».«.........� IPOTTEI...........................BALTAREW................. — IWONTD........................WRMY..................... _ ISRTZERI........................STEINER....................». — (MILLER)..........................MAN.............. .........». HSwp.aMadmNLBS10IHECT0NIDlmMm Noll Ull.EDC.IM 12117197