Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-09-24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ' September 18, 1997 NOTICE OF MEETING ,none: JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS t7141 9622411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .We,address: NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 BO.Bait 8127 OF ORANGE COUN-FY, CALIFORNIA raameln Way.CA 927288127 Want aECress: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1997 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 ells Avenue Fountain� 9701 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation "gene$ Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date. Cities Antheim area Buena Park Cyyress .j (�� Fountain Valley Fullerton BqO tedAtary— Huntington Beach ne L e Habra Le Palma Los Alamiws Neagort ra Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Orange Placentia Senor Ane Seal Beach PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Sum ban WORKSHOP - Thursday, September 25, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. Villa Park yorba Linda OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND County of orange TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 1, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. Sanitary oismlcta PLANNING, DESIGN AND - Thursday, October 2, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE Cosw Mo. Gordan Grove FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND Midway City HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 8, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. water Districts Irvine Pane. RATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE WORKSHOP (Tentative) - Thursday, October 9, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 22, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. AD HOC COMMITTEE RE: STRATEGIC PLAN - Thursday, October 23, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A Public Was:ei are,and Er"ronmenwl Management Agency Comm4wd to arcowng the Environment Since 1954 JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Joint Board Meeting October October 22, 1997 November November 19, 1997 December December 17, 1997 January January 28, 1998 February February 28, 1998 March March 25, 1998 April April22, 1998 May May 27, 1998 June June 24, 1998 July July29, 1998 August August 26, 1998 September September 23, 1998 October October 28, 1998 AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS'ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 108"ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 24, 1997-7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has ', been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 09/24/97 Page 2 of 8 - 6. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 Au ust 27 1997 District 2 August 27, 1997 District 3 August 27, 1997 District 5 August 27, 1997 District 6 August 27, 1997 District 7 August 27, 1997 District 11 August 27 1997 District 13 August 27 1997 District 14 August 27, 1997 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vole will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) ALL DISTRICTS 07/23/97 08/06/97 Joint Operating Fund $453,014.50 0.00 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 474,352.75 2,942,744.40 Joint Working Capital Fund 169,959.98 1,517,545.17 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 37,739.68 10,365.30 District No. 1 600.00 0.00 District No. 2 26,141.80 3,325.84 District No. 3 16,879.92 15,947.13 District No. 5 705.00 1,296.66 District No. 6 210.00 0.00 District No. 7 5,646.07 610.00 District No. 11 2,499.02 10,500.03 District No. 13 0.00 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 0.00 Districts Nos. 5 &6 1,376.18 0.00 Districts Nos. 7 & 14 7,596.71 0.00 TOTALS $1.196.721.61 $4 502 334 53 09/24/97 Page 3 of 8 CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEM NOS. 9- 12) All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 9. Adopt Resolution No. 97-31, Revising Districts' Procedures for Settlement of Claims Made Against the Districts; Settlement of Claims Made by the Districts; Collection of Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts; Settlement of Civic or Administrative Actions; and Settlement of Worker's Compensation Actions; and repealing Resolution No. 95-112. DISTRICT 2 10. Receive and file petition received from Reza Dadashi of Boulevard Development, Inc. requesting annexation of 7.025 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and County Hills Road in the City of Anaheim; and adopt Resolution No. 97-34-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District(proposed Annexation No. 76-Portion of Tract No. 14185 to County Sanitation District No. 2). DISTRICT 5 11. Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract, Wal-Con Construction Co. v. County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 782457, in connection with Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3; and authorize the Districts'General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. 09/24/97 Page 4 of 8 ..t DISTRICT 7 (Consent Calendar continued) 12. Receive and file petition received from William Deutsch and five other property owners requesting annexation of 4.17 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Foothill Boulevard and East Lemon Heights Drive in the unincorporated area of Orange County; and adopt Resolution No. 97-35-7, authorizing initiation of annexation of said territory to the District. (Proposed Annexation No. 152 Deutsch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 13. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, K any. 09/24/97 Page 5 of 8 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re September 24, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 27, 1997 to be filed. C. 1. Verbal report by Engineering Department 2. Approve Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser& McKee for Job Nos. J-4D-1 and J-40-2 re Preparation of Phase 1 of Strategic Plan in the amount of$61,667 for a total amount not to exceed $2,020,411.00. 15. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re September 3, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 3, 1997 to be filed. 16, a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re September 4, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 4, 1997 to be filed. C. DISTRICT 2 Accept Contract No. 2-7A, Modifications to Portions of Atwood Subtrunk Sewer for Riverside Freeway Reconstruction of 91/57 Interchange, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the final closeout agreement with Paulus Engineering, Inc. (PDC97-43) d. Approve plans and specifications for TWAS Feed to Digesters F and G at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39-1, authorize the General Manager to set October 14, 1997 for bid opening, and authorize the Board Secretary to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. (PDC97-44) e. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. for design of plans and specifications for Plant No. 2 Warehouse, Job No. 132-65, for a total amount not to exceed$42,705.00. (PDC97-45) 09/24/97 Page 6 of 8 17. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re September 10, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 10, 1997 to be filed. C. Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of August 1997. d. Receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period April 1 through June 30, 1997. (FAHR97-57) e. Receive and file FY 96/97 Year End Performance Objective and Workplan Report for the period ending June 30, 1997. (FAHR97-59) f. ITEM DELETED g. Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; award a Professional Services Agreement with Wackenhut Corporation for Security Services, Specification No. P-177, providing for two guards 24 hours per day, for a one-year period beginning September 16, 1997, with provision for four one-year extensions, for an amount not to exceed $200,000 per year, and increase the budget allocation from $130,000 to $200,000. (FAHR97-63) h. Adopt Resolution No. 97-32, approving the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, including the revisions recommended in the report and renewing the delegation of investment authority to the Districts' Director of Finance/Treasurer for 1997-98; authorizing the Districts to enter into short-tern (90-day) reverse repurchase agreements upon the recommendation of Districts' external money managers, with a report back to the Committee; and Districts may not enter into long-term reverse repurchase agreements without approval of the Joint Boards of Directors. 09/24/97 Page 7 of 8 18. a. Verbal report by Chair of Executive Committee re September 17, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 17, 1997 to be filed. C. Receive and file LAFCO application for the consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and adopt Resolution No. 97-33 authorizing staff to formally submit application package to LAFCO for consideration. 19. Approve increase to the loan fund aggregate maximum for the Financial Assistance Program for Purchase of Computer Equipment for employees from $150,000 to: a)$200,000; b) $250,000; c) eliminate the maximum cap. 20. ALL DISTRICTS CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chair may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Govemment Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6. as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Boards take final actions on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with Districts' Management and General Counsel re appeals of termination of employees from investigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1), (2)). 2. Confer with Special Counsel re status of litigation, Louis Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)). 3. Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Lam and Donna Anderson v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Orange County Superior Court Case No. T73598 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)). 4. (DISTRICT 3) Confer with General Counsel re claim of Byrum, Holland and Griffin (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1)). 09/24/97 Page 8 of 8 20. ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 7) a. 5. (DISTRICT 5) Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation, Wal-Con Construction Co v County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 782457 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, R any, on matters considered in dosed session 21. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 22. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 23. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 24. Adjournments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the dose of business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. I Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026 i deadAara2\wp.Ma%dE MBSWG9M EP97%M2497.Cae COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) September 17, 1997 Board Secretary phone: 17141962-2411 To the Chairman and Members mailing address: of the Joint Boards of Directors P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley.CA 9272Ba127 Subject: Board Letter attract address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 92708­7016 information on any of the items, please call me. Souce Control's Pretreatment Program Receives EPA's 1997 National First Place Member Award Agencies • We have received notification from Robert Perciasepe, Assistant Administrator of tines EPA, that our pretreatment program has been awarded first place for the outstanding Pretreatment Program in the greater than 100 Significant Industrial Users category. A Anaheim ceremony will be held on Monday, October 20, in Chicago at the 70th Annual Water Brea Environment Federation conference. A co of Mr. Perciase e's letter is enclosed. Buena Brea PY P Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Preparations for El Nino Hundngmn Beach Irvine Le Habra Data correlating sea surface temperature, atmospheric pressure, and fish migration Le Palma shows that an El Nino event is likely during 1997-98; however, the impacts to Orange Los Alamitos Count s weather and coastline is highly variable. Typically, during an El Nifio, this Newport Beach Y 9 Y YP Y� 9 orange region can expect warmer coastal temperatures, higher sea level, and an increased Placantie number of storms that last longer and are more intense than normal. Same Ana Beal Beach Blanton The Districts historically prepare for severe winter storms by undertaking several Tustin measures, including a strong continuous preventative maintenance program, testing Ville Perk of critical systems, and employee training. The focus of Districts' staff during heavy yorba Linea rains has always been to prtect public health and the environment. This is county of orange accomplished by efficiently utilizing the design capacities of all of the Districts' facilities and relying on experienced staff. Benitary Districts For the 1997-98 winter and the threat of a strong El MAD condition, the Districts has Costa Mae. formed a cross-departmental team to make additional preparations for a potentially Garden Drove severe winter. The followingsteps have begun: Midway City severe P 9 Water Districts 1. Prepare the Districts' staff by updating existing procedures, training, and table-top Irvine Ranch exercises 2. Increase supplies necessary to combat winter storms, such as flood mitigation equipment 3. Monitor tidal conditions to determine when impacts along the coast will be the greatest, and 4. Monitor short-term weather forecasts. Annually, the Orange County Public Facilities and Resources Department (PFBRD), formerly the Environmental Management Agency(EMA), and the Orange County A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954 b Members of the Boards of Directors Page 2 September 17, 1997 Emergency Operations Center prepare for winter storms. Currently, PF&RD is developing a"Preparedness Report"for the 1997-98 winter storm season, which should be complete by the end of September. The October 2 and November 6 Orange County Emergency Management Organization (OCEMO) meetings will be held at the Huntington Beach Central Library and the Orange County Storm Center, respectively. These meetings will focus on El Nino and winter storm preparedness. There are several enclosures included with the attachments that detail staff activities. Treatment Plant Environmental Permit Compliance Bob Doter, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reports that the Districts' treatment plants were operated in complete compliance for all water, solids, air and energy permit criteria for the entire 1996-97 fiscal year. Activities Supporting Ocean Discharge Permit Application On September 12, the first of several informal workshops to provide information about our ocean discharge permit was held at a meeting of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. Staff made a presentation on two items: 1) the results of a survey of recreational uses of the waters off our coast; and 2) a study of the movement of the effluent plume. The materials from the presentation are included in the attachments. The Regional Board will be developing waste discharge requirements to be included in our ocean discharge permit. The presentation was to help the Regional Board members evaluate those requirements. Several Regional board members commented that they found the presentation informative and helpful. I have previously provided you with the tentative schedule for the permit renewal, which calls for issuance of the permit in January 1998. 1 will keep you informed on additional presentations and the progress in the permit renewal process. Federal Funding for the OCR Project On September 11, Blake Anderson and Bill Mills, General Manager of the Orange County Water District, met with ten members of the California Republican delegation at its regularly scheduled luncheon in Washington to discuss water reclamation and the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project (OCR). The delegation was interested and engaged in the subject and indicated support for the need for water reclamation projects in California. Blake and Bill pointed out that the water supply would become increasingly short in California and the Southwest unless new management initiatives are put in place. The population of California alone is expected to increase by 18 million during the next 30 years, while at the same time Members of the Boards of Directors Page 3 September 17, 1997 California will be taking less water from the Colorado River as other states take the allotments originally allocated to them in a 1966 federal court decision. There simply is not enough water to meet the competing demands of urban, agricultural and environmental needs. The Bureau of Reclamation has been authorized to fund the OCR Project up to $20 million. However, authorizing a project is the easy part; appropriating the money is the difficult part. Funding for federal FY 98 looks unlikely because of the balanced budget agreement. For this reason, our attention will now be directed toward the FY 99 budget, draft versions of which are now being submitted to OMB. Fortunately, we have time. Significant spending on OCR will not occur for another two years and will extend for two or three years after that. Blake and Bill also met with the Bureau of Reclamation and OMB during their Washington visit. Their purpose was to determine how to get into the Administration's budget request, which will significantly increase the likelihood of funding success. SUI Pulse Power Test Project Included in the attachments is a July 2, 1997 memo from Ed Torres summarizing the SUI Pulse Power research project. Unfortunately, no positive effects were demonstrated and the project has been terminated. AMSA Supports EPA's Draft Municipal Settlement Policy The Friday, August 22, 1997, FaxAfert from AMSA outlines the recommendations made to EPA. A copy is attached for your reading. Brochure on Hichliahts of Restructuring California's Electric Industry I have enclosed a brochure on deregulating the power industry. This is an issue that will affect all of us and may drive the way the Districts' operate their Central Power Generation units in the future. Letter of Commendation for Mike Masterson It is always a pleasure to hear good things about our employees, and the enclosed letter from the Municipal Water District of Orange County commends Mike Masterson for assisting them in finding a source of rising groundwater. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 4 September 17, 1997 Opposition to AB 940 On September 4, a letter(copy enclosed)was sent to all State senators opposing AB 940. This bill would amend the present law relating to progress payments on all public works contracts and would set the maximum retention rate at 5%. 1 feel that this would place our agency at risk; in the event a contract is not completed satisfactorily or defects need correction, 5% may not be enough to ensure completion. DARTBOARD A copy of the September 4, 1997 edition of DARTBOARD is included tc update you on DART's current activities. WERF Protect Study to Re-enoineer Wastewater Plant Operations and Maintenance Malcolm Pimie was selected to prepare a benchmarking study to develop an industry- wide Operations and Maintenance re-engineering toolkit. Bob Oolen has been asked to join the team as a utility member. Malcolm Pimie, by selecting Bob, shows that he is recognized as one of the country's leading proponents and experts on benchmarking in this industry. Bob's direct involvement helps us evaluate our benchmarks as well. Odor Complaints on the Rise The recent spell of high temperatures and humidity has resulted in a rise in the number of odor complaints from our neighbors. Staff routinely responds to these calls by making visits to particular areas of the plants to locate the odor, by completing the necessary tracking forms to identify patterns, and by ensuring that the appropriate corrective measures are taken to reduce odors. If needed, staff will place a follow-up call to a neighbor. Plant 1 Operations staff recently toured the plant with a resident to seek his assistance in identifying a specific odor. Overall, neighbors have been very appreciative of staffs efforts and recognize we are taking steps to minimize odors. Risk Manaaementlinsurance Claims Responsibilities Transferred An internal audit of the Board Secretary's Office identified several suggestions for improving efficiency, including ways to streamline the Districts' Risk Management Program. The audit recommended that responsibilities for tracking insurance claims and other risk management duties be transferred from the Board Secretary's Office to Steve Kozak, Risk Manager. Staff is currently in the process of making that transition with Steve assuming responsibility for these specific duties by October 1. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 5 September 17, 1997 Court Decision on Biosolids Land Application Issues in the Central Valley In May 1996, a lawsuit was filed to rescind biosolids land application permits for approximately 50,000 acres in California's Central Valley since an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)was not prepared for these generic permit sites. On June 12, 1997, the judge ruled that an EIR should have been prepared and gave parties 90 days to solicit funding and prepare a schedule to do an EIR. Since the June 12 ruling, Districts' staff has been actively working with other California POTWs through wastewater organizations, the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA), and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board to solicit up to $450,000 for an EIR. On September 12, the judge found the amount of funds pledged to be adequate and gave his approval for the preparation of an EIR. He allowed 90 days to complete an administrative process to manage the EIR and three years for preparation of the EIR itself. During this time biosolids can continue to be land applied on these permitted sites. AMSA's Special Section in Engineering News-Record fENR1 The September 8, 1997 issue of ENR included a special section prepared by AMSA on "Choosing Competitiveness: The Reengineering Revolution in Wastewater Management." Pat McNelly, the Districts' Education and Training Specialist, was a contributing author. His article, entitled "Orange County Finds Employee Teams are Key to Change," appears on page A-8. A copy of the special section is enclosed, along with a letter of appreciation to Pat from AMSA. Articles of Interest Enclosed are published articles on issues affecting the Districts that you may find interesting. My October Schedule I will be on vacation between October 6 and October 10. On Monday and Tuesday, October 13 and 14, 1 will be in San Francisco at the League of California Cities conference. On Wednesday, October 15, beginning at noon, and Thursday, October 16, the Executive Management Team is holding its semi-annual retreat. And I will be attending the WEFTEC'97 conference in Chicago between Saturday, October 18 and Wednesday, October 22, returning for the Steering Committee and Joint Boards meetings. My assistant, Jean, will have my itinerary and can contact me if you need to talk with me during any of these absences. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 6 September 17, 1997 If you `wouooujlldlike additional information on any of the above items, please call me. DonaldF. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt X 4xp.tl WminWM1pFM OARD.L1R09 2497 tlx Enclosures: August 27, 1997 letter from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Package on El Nino Preparations Ocean Recreation in Orange County (2 documents) July 2, 1997 memo re SUI Pulse Power Test Project August 22, 1997 AMSA FaxAlert Brochure on Highlights of Restructuring California's Electric Industry August 19, 1997 Letter of Commendation from MWDOC Sample of September 4, 1997 letter to State Senators re AB 940 September 4, 1997 DARTBOARD September 8, 1997 Thank you letter from AMSA and Printout Magazine and Newspaper articles of interest taco srn s i A UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY � /J Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 my �o pl ppOlE� DllG 27 199T OFFICE OF WATER Mr. John Collins, Joint Chairman County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Dear Mr. Collins: I am very pleased to announce that the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County has been selected to receive the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 1997 national first place award for an outstanding Pretreatment Program in the greater than 100 Significant Industrial Users category. EPA based this selection on the innovative and effective approaches your pretreatment program has implemented to improve influent and effluent water quality and sludge quality. Your selection, the result of an extensive national competition, recognizes the exceptional pretreatment efforts by your community and the dedication of your organization. We will officially announce the national winners at the EPA Wastewater Management Excellence Awards Ceremony on Monday, October 20, 1997, in Chicago, Illinois, at the 70th Annual Water Environment Federation Conference. My staff will contact you shortly to provide more information regarding the ceremony and conference, and to answer any questions you may have. As EPA Celebrates the 25th Anniversary of the Clean Water Act, presentation of these awards heightens public awareness of the contributions wastewater treatment facilities make to clean water. Congratulations and thank you for your commitment to excellence through the Pretreatment Program. Sincerely, w Robert Perciasepe Assistant Administrator cc: Senator Dianne Feinstein Senator Barbara Boxer Representative Ed Royce RxYeled/RacYcleda.Pnnled Mth VepeleUk 00 a asW Inl on 10 Rery Papal om Pefimnsu.0 Representative Jay Kim Representative Dana Rohrabacher Representative Loretta Sanchez - Representative Christopher Cox Governor Pete Wilson Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX x September 4, 1997 STAFF REPORT: 1997-98 el Nino Event From: Dan Tunnicliff Summary On August 19, 1997, Safety and Emergency Response (S&ER) Staff attended a half- day workshop at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla entitled "Workshop on the Potential Coastal Impacts of an el Nino Winter". Numerous research scientists and experts ranging from oceanographers and meteorologists to marine life specialists presented their findings regarding past and predicted el Nino Southern Oscillations (ENSOs), the scientific term for an el Nino event. Data correlating sea surface temperature, atmospheric pressure, and fish migration shows that an el Nino event is likely during 1997-98, however, the impacts to our weather and coastline is highly variable. Typically, during an el Nino, we can expect warmer coastal temperatures, higher sea level, and an increased number of storms that last longer and are more intense than normal. The last strong/very strong el Nino occurred in 1982-83 and brought with it massive storms and caused extensive damage from South America to North America. The 1982-83 el Nino was blamed for between 1,300 and 2,000 deaths and more than $13 billion in damage to property and livelihoods worldwide. Though usually associated with extensive winter storms impacts to the United States, previous strong/very strong el Ninos have brought widespread drought to the Western United States. Therefore, a strong/very strong el Nino does not always correlate to a severe impact to California. Many sources believe the 1997-98 el Nino has the potential to surpass the 1982-83 el Nino in size and impact, however, the exact impact it will have on California is unknown. Therefore, it is prudent to assume the 1997-98 winter will bring larger than normal storms and with them greater than normal precipitation. 1997-98 el Nino Event Page 2 of 3 September 4, 1997 Background Typically, el Nino events vary in intensity and occur every 2 to 7 years. El Nino events are thought to be caused by a pressure shift between the south pacific and Indonesia that causes the trade winds to relax or reverse. Warm water that is usually found around Indonesia and west of the International Date Line moves eastward across the Pacific to South America. El Nino events are primarily forecasted by a significant rise in the sea surface temperature, as much as 7° F, along the equator from the International Date Line to South America. This warm water spreads north and south along the South American coast. In addition to bringing warmer water, the diminished or reversed trade winds causes the sea level to rise as much as 0.7 feet along North and South America, which can contribute to greater coastal impacts. Tropical thunderstorms that typically fall over Southeast Asia during the monsoon season move with the warm water and fall over the middle of the Pacific Ocean. During el Nino these thunderstorms can affect North and South America with increased precipitation and increased waves generated from the high winds due to the stones. Large surf is directly correlated to pacific storms. Since there is a greater potential for storms during an el Nino, there is also a greater potential for large surf. Though, weather can be highly variable. A high-pressure zone along the coast pushed the waves north during the 1977 el Nino that resulted in little to no impact to the California coastline. This high-pressure zone did not exist during the 1982-83 el Nino, which resulted in large surf generated from storms west of California and resulted in extensive coastal damage. An el Nino event can increase the frequency and intensity of offshore storms and elevate sea levels, but it has no effect on the fides. Tidal conditions are forecasted into the future with great accuracy. In comparison with the devastating 1982-83 el Nino, the highest high tides during the 1997-98 winter will be approximately 0.2 feet lower which may help reduce potentially negative coastal impacts. Since the dates and times for the high tides are known, additional precautions can be taken during these times to help minimize the potential negative affects of increased precipitation and surf. Combined influences of thunderstorms, elevated sea levels, and increased surf from el Nino can cause significant impacts to California. d 1997-98 el Nino Event Page 3 of 3 September 4, 1997 Conclusion It is in the Districts best interest to prepare for severe winter storms in 1997-98. Combined, strong offshore thunderstorms, elevated sea levels, and high tides can contribute to extensive coastal impact. The Districts have formed a cross-departmental team to prepare for a severe winter. The following steps have begun: 1. Prepare the Districts' staff 2. Increase supplies necessary to combat winter storms 3. Monitor tidal conditions to determine when impacts along the coast will be the greatest 4. Monitor short-term weather forecasts For More Information S&ER routinely monitors several emergency response related webpages, including several that relate to el Nino. The following webpages have been found to be particularly informative regarding el Nino: • The NOAA/PMEL/TAO el Nino Theme Page [sponsored by the Department of Commerce, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL), and the Tropical Atmosphere Ocean (TAO) Array] can be found at http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/togal-tao/el-nino/. • The Climate Diagnostics Center [sponsored by NOAA and the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES)] can be found at http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/ENSO/. • The National Weather Service, San Francisco Bay Area can be found at hftp://nws.mbay.neV. DET:dt M:\wp.dta%12530UunniciAEmeigency Responsew nino SW Mpon.doc 1997-98 Storm Preparation Checklist - DRAFT Cal- Department in IERP Part of Part of Routine Plant Plant ec4 Work Task Description Issue Lead Function IERP IFMP Activity No,i No.2 ions Determine the impact of Foster P.S.being out-of-service due to J-34-1 Outfall Construction Mgt. High Flow X X Establish Pumping Capacity of Foster Pump Station(talk to JDH) Outfall Design Engineering High Flow X X Conduct OOBS Annual Maximum Flow Pump Test(Discharge No.001) Outfall O&M High Flow X X Exercise and Ready 7S'OutfalVFoster P.S(Discharge No.002) OuHall O&M High Flow X X Inspect&Exercise Flap Gates at Santa Ana River(Discharge No.003) Outfall O&M High Flow X X Install Vortex Breakers in GOBS Wetwell Outfall Design Engineering High Flow X Consider Upgrading/Rehab of Foster Pump Station as Interim Flow Plan Outfall O&M High Flow X Brief RWQCB,OC Health Dept.,at.al. regarding Contingency Planning Efforts Communication Communications High Flow X Establish Flow Management Plan with IRWD dealing with GAP Intertie Project Communication Design Engineering High Flow X Coordinate GAP Intertie Flow Management Plan with CSDOC O&M Communication Design Engineering High Flow X Establish an Engineering Department resource team Communication Design/Consb High Flow X Establish Relationship with OCEMA Flood Control Communication High Flow Develop List of Media Contacts for Emergency Events Communication Communications High Flow X Establish"Call-in"Protacal for Check-in;maybe one number for the public,another for Develop our consultants,etc. Procedures Communications High Flow X Provide Updated List of Radio Call Numbers Develop IT High Flow X X Procedures Ensure Carolds Outfall Model is On-line and Usable at Central Command Center Develop Procedures O&M High Flow X X Inspect all Airguns/Portable Operators/Lifts/Come-Along(s)/etc. Develop O8M High Flow X Procedures Conduct Table-Top Exercises with Contractors Develop S&ER High Flow Procedures Establish Sandbag Implementation Plan Develop O&M/Construction Flood X Procedures A. Determine if Sandbags we currently own are in good condition Purchasing Flood X B.Generate Inventory of Sandbag Supply Purchasing Flood X C. Develop Plan for Storing Sand Bags O&M Flood X D. Develop Plan for Using Sandbags O&M Flood X Ensure that Can Gen Supervisors and Collections Supervisors are Involved in the Develop O&M/GSA High Flow X X X X Storm Preparation Process Procedures Establish Hand-held Radio Protocal;Is P1 Control Center in Command of Radio Develop O&MAT High Flow X Access? Procetlures Incorporate IFMP into IERP and Publish Documentation Develop O&M/SBER High Flow X X Procedures Provide Training Necessary to Carry-out IERP&IFMP Develop O&M/S&ER High Flow X X Procedures IERP-Integrated Emergency Response Plan IFMP-Interim Flow Management Plan Quid repairs.major repairs,and other activities may imply GSA support xtlN either tome account or correct work GrEXCELDTA10Mlf41OKMEMER197-ga Storm Preparation mv4 xls 1997-98 Storm Preparation Checklist - DRAFT Coll- Department In IERP Part of Part of Routine Plant Plant act. Work Task Description Issue Lead Function IERP IFMP Activity No,1 No.2 ;Ions Conduct Table-Top Exercise by November 15 Develop O&M/S&ER High Flow X Procedures Establish Incident Command System for High Flow Conditions Develop Procedures O&M/SEER High Flow X Issue Purchase Orders In Advance for Equipment, Supplies,People,etc. Develop Procedures purchasing High Flow X X Establish Weather Forecasting System(on-line web?,Flood Control District?,Si Develop Procedures S&ER High Flow X X Determine if COBS should be the Command Center;If so what resources are needed Develop S&ER High Flow X X X there Procedures Provide Handbook for 1997-98 Storm Contingency(Tunnicliffs Summary) Develop $8ER High Flow X Procedures Update all Phone Lists,Call Phone Lists,Pager Lists Develop Procedures SEER/IT High Flow X X Determine Trigger Levels for Storm Events and Establishment of ICS Develop S8ER/0&M High Flow X % Procedures Publish Command Center Protocol for Plant Nos. 1,2 and Districts Develop Procedures SBER/08M High Flaw X X Establish Joint-Response Protocol with Our Sister Agencies Develop Procedures Communications Flood Establish OCWD Contact Protocol Develop Procedures Communications High Flow Establish Stand-by Agreements with Contractors for In-Plant Emergencies Develop Procedures Construction Mgt, High Flow Establish Stand-by Agreements with Contractors for Districts Emergencies Develop Procedures Construction Mgt. High Flow Retain Stand-by Construction Equipment for Emergency Use(such as Buntik Develop Procedures Construction Mgt. High Flow Practice Installing Plant No. 1 Storm Gates Develop O&M Flood X Procedures Determine if OCWD can assist CSDOC in handling Peak Flows Develop Procedures 08M High Flow Provide Overnight Accommodations for Emergency Staff(food,beds,etc.) Develop Procedures S&ER High Flow X X X X X Establish OC Strike Force for Storm 1997-98 Develop Procedures Executive Mgt, Flood Suspend Ongoing Construction Projects which Interfere with High Flow Operations Construction Construction Mgt, High Flow Impacts A. P1-01,P2-08 Primary Basin Rehab Construction Mgt. High Flow X X B.P1-38-2 Secondary Expansion at Plant No. i Construction Mgt. High Flow X IERP-Integrated Emergi Response Plan IFMP-Inbdm Flow Management Plan Quick repa rs,major mpain,and other activikee may Imply GSA support with either force account or wntracl work G'.IE%CELDWOMWilAKMEMERW]-gB Storm Preparation raW.als 1997-98 Storm Preparation Checklist - DRAFT Call- Department In IERP Partol Partof Routine Plant Plant ect. Work Task Description Issue Lead Function IERP IFMP Activity No.1 N0.2 Ions C.J-34-1 Surge Tower Replacement Project Construction Mgt High Flow X D.J313 Headworks Automation at Plant No. i Construction Mgt. High Flow X E.Miscellaneous Construction Projects Construction Mgt. High Flow X X X Establish Interim Flow Plan for Main Street Pump Station due to Construction Pump Stations Construction Mgt. High Flow X Connect Main Street flume Q signal into Plant No. 1 Control Center Pump Stations O&M High Flow X Rent Engine Generators for Critical Pump Stations Pump Stations O&M/Purchasing High Flow X Purchase 180 kW generators-2 of them(need more?) Pump Stations O&M/S&ER/Purch High Flow X Confirm that SARI Line has Proper Protection Trunk Sewers Collections High Flow X Confirm that SARI Gate in Yorba Linda is Functional Trunk Sewers Collections High Flow X Provide Short-Term Solutions to Major Sources of Inflow/Infiltration Trunk Sewers Collections/Cities High Flow X A. Plug Critical Manhole Covers Collections/Cities High Flow X B.Target Streets with a Past History of flooding/Contact Flood Control District Collections/Cities High Flow X C.Send Letter to Public Works Directors regarding Manhole Covers Communications High Flow X Notify South Coast Plaza&Other Low-Lying Users of Possible Storm Impacts Trunk Sewers Communications High Flow X Evaluate Interplant/Knott Trunk Capacity vs. P7 Influent/Diversion Flows Trunk Sewers Design/O&M High Flow X X X Ensure that Collections Activities are Incorporated in IERP Trunk Sewers GSA/S&ER High Flow X X X Establish Remote Rolling Equipment Storage Locations Trunk Sewers S&ER High Flow X Work with Industry to Minimize Flows During Peak Storm Events Trunk Sewers Source Control High Flow X A. Establish a high to low list of Industrial Users based on Flow Source Control High Flow X Utilize Collection System Flow Meters installed for Strategic Plan, if possible Trunk Sewers Design Engineering High Flow X Determine if we Should Disconnect from SCE during Storm Event for Sys Stability Electrical/ Design Engineering High Flow X X Instrumentation Electri Weather-proof COGen Transformers rumecel/ Insttrumentation Design Engineering Flood X X Survey Overhead Power Lines for Potential Problems;Remedy as necessary Electrical/ GSA Flood Instrumentation Checkout all Critical Electrical and Instrumentation Equipment/Repair if necessary Electrical/Instrumentation O&M High Flow X X X X Consider Temporary Electricity for P7 A.S.plant due to potential Basement Flooding Electrical/ O&M High Flow X Instrumentation Monitor Silverado Dewatering Flows Electrical/Instrumentation Construction Mgt. High Flow X X Provide Back-up Water Supply to Critical Systems,if GAP goes down. Utility Design Engineering High Flow X X Provide Electric Generation Capacity for Critical In-Plant Systems Utility O&M High Flow X X Provide Back-up Cooling Water Supply at Plant No. 1 Can Gen Utility Design Engineering High Flow X Install Surge Tower Camera/Alarm/Sensor/Site Tube Utility Design Engineering High Flow X IERP-Integrated Emergenoy Response Plan IFMP.Interne Flow Management Plan Guice repaint,maim regain,and other acin hies may imply GSA wi,,i with either force aunt or contrad work G'.�CEL.DTA%0M 1MRAEMER97-99 Skim PrelHragon re,4.a1s 1997-98 Storm Preparation Checklist - DRAFT C011- Department ln IERP Part of Part of Routine Plant Plant ect- Work Task Description Issue Lead Function IERP IFMP Ac6v1 No.1 No.2 Ions Reassign Personnel on a Temporary Basis as needed to Prepare for Storms Storm Preparation Executive Mgt, High Flow Prepare for High Winds(such as tramming trees,battening down loose items,etc.) Storm GSA Flood Preparation Remove Launder Valves at Clarifiers during Peak Flows Other Plant 08M High Flow X X X Make Necessary Arrangements for Disinfection of Effluent Other Plant 08M High Flow X X Analyze Hydraulics at Plant No.2; specifically,determine if an interlock between GOBS Other Plant 08M/PAG/Design High Flow X and Headworks can minimize the hydraulic impacts if COBS drops off line. Prepare One of the 109'in-plant pipelines for Emergency Storage Storage 08M High Flow X X Maximize In-Plant Clarifier Storage(Primaries&Secondaries) Storage O&M/Construction High Flow X X X Utilize Undeveloped Areas at P1 and P2 for Flow Equalization Storage Design Engineering High Flow X X Inspect 66"and 84"Interplant pipelines and Repair if necessary Storage 08M High Flow X X X Repair/Replace Plant No. 1 Grit Chamber Sluice Gale Repair 08M High Flow X Repair-Repalce Plant No.2 Bar Screen Sluice Gate Repair 08M High Flow X Repair Clarifier A Gale Repair O&M High Flow X Repair"B"Headworks Discharge Gate Repair 08M High Flow X Add Lifting Capauly at Plant No.2 A.S. Effluent Gates Repair O&M/Design High Flow X Add Lining Capacity al Plant No. 1 Primary Influent Gates Repair O&M/Design High Flow X IERP-hastiness Emergenry Response Plan IFMP-Interim Flow Management Plan Guide repairs,major repairs,and other activities may imply GSA support with either force account or contract work G:IEXCEL.OTA101VIIO.110WRAEMERW7-98 Slorm Preparation revlAs Workshop on the Potential Coastal Impacts of an el Niiio Winter Scripps Institution of Oceanoe aphy Sumner Auditorium August 19, 1997 - 10 AM to 2 PM AGENDA Introduction and Welcome - Dr. Reinhard E. Flick Welcome from the Sponsors Mr. Chuck Raysbrook, Director, California Department of Boating & Waterways Ms. Lesley Ewing, President, California Shore and Beach Preservation Association Invited Speaker Program Dr. Daniel R. Cayan Weather Effects of an el Niiio Along the California Coast Director, Climate Research Division, SIO Mr. Ronald C. Dotson Coastal Warming and Fishing During an el Nifio Southwest fisheries Science Center Dr. Reinhard E. Flick Tides and Mean Sea Level in 1982-83 and 1997-98 Oceanographer, CDBW and SIO Dr. Nicholas E. Graham Large Scale Ocean and Atmosphere Predictions for the International Research Institute 1997-98 el Niflo Event for Climate Prediction, SIO Dr. Clive E. Dorman The Relationship Between San Diego Rainfall and ENSO Center for Coastal Studies, slo Events: The Forecaster's Predicament Dr. Richard J. Seymour The Connection Between ENSO Events and Damaging Coastal Research Engineer, SIO Waves Dr. Douglas L. Inman Climate Change and the Sediment Flux of Small California Professor Emeritus, SIO Rivers Working Lunch Past and Proposed Coastal Monitoring U.S. Geological Survey Coastal and Marine Geology Program, Menlo Park Afternoon Breakout Sessions Measurement Needs and Opportunities Flood Preparedness Planting Storm Response to Coastal Facilities B-U4-Si 04:ZOM F-M ARE WE REARS' ??? El VINO 4 aQa4 � 66a a Strategic Planning Workshop for Who Should Attend: Orange County 1. Public Works DlreetWrs Works 3. ndHldualsRespo Flood Response slbleforsLDwl Coastal Cities WEdNESdAy, SEPTEMbER 17, 19 9 7 11 mkq��� 10AM - 2PM Huntington Beach Public Works HUNTINGTON BEAch CITY HAIR, Rm's B .7 & 8 R. NA BY 4/1S/91 CAU 53 P51 Lunch Provided 11 � � . F SEP 08 '97 01:31PM OR 4GE COUNTY EOC P.2/2 VAM OP AGENCY KR w1150N. Oe w..w DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES - 1416 NI Si M, P.O. !O% 94OU SAOUM o. U 9{ry6CO91 i91a A13a9P1 . R e g r f V f 0 August 25, 1997 SEP - 8 t992, TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES The Department of Water Resources will present a one-day training course on 'Flood Fight Methods'for public agencies. This class will be held on October 20, 21, 28, 29, 30 and 31, 1997 at the DWR Training Facility at 1721 — 13" Street, Sacramento, California 95814. Each class will begin at 8:30 a.m., include a lunch break, and end at 3:30 p.m. There will be no cos to the participants for this course. Participants will learn to construct flood emergency protection structures by using sandbags, lumber, canvas, and plastic. Since the training involves actual construction participation, clothing suitable for field work is advised. In order to arrange for proper class size, we will need to know how many persons will be attending, preferred date and a contact telephone number. Class size will be limited to 30 participants each day, an early sign up is suggested. Please submit the necessary information to Keith Luster, Department of Water Resources, Post Office Box 219000, Sacramento, California 95821-9000, telephone 800-952-5530, by October 7, 1997. You will be notified of the class date and time assigned to your group. Directions to the training site will be provided. We can also discuss the possibilities of training at your facility. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, eith Luster, Flood Fight Specialist Emergency Response Section Division of flood Management City of Huntington Beach El Nino — Flood Preparedness Steps Prepared by: Glorria Morrison, Huntington Beach Emergency Services Coordinator 714-536-5980 and Dan Noble, Public Works Maintenance Operations Manager The City has taken the following preparedness steps-, 1. Purchased 30,000 sandbags. Sandbags will be available at several Ere stations, the City's Municipal Corporate Yard, and at the Southern California Edison site directly adjacent to Warner Avenue and Lark Street. 2. Cleaning catch basin inlets and applicable pipes as necessary. 3. Inspected all storm drain outfalls in the harbor areas for sand buildup that could preclude drainage of storm waters. No problems detected. 4. Installing new trash gates on city channel to insure proper operation of the system. 5. Repaired and cleaned the water storage basin adjacent to Huntington Equestrian Center. 6, purchased additional street barricades, delineators, and warning signs: 7. Cleaning all open city channeis. 8. Trimming trees to eliminate leaves and branches from falling into storm drain structures. Removing plant growth in am=drain channels that would preclude flow of storm waters. 9. Installed new storm inlets in several low laying areas o the City. 10. The City is prepared to barricade hazardous areas and post warning signs, as necessary. 11. Some interim mitigation measures have been taken which include: 1) Corsican Flood Chamtcl's damage from prior storms has been repaired and minor modifications have been made to one side of the channel to minim; flooding to the apartments in the area. 2)New catch basins have been installed along Gothard area of Corsican Channel, 3) Minor modifications to storm drain facilities on Michael Drive have been made; inlets have been Added; storm drain waters have bees touted away from the area. 12. At the August 25, 1997 City Council meeting, the Council requested a staff report on flood mitigation measures that cart be taken to lessen the threat to Huntington Beach residents. Council briefing is to be scheduled. City staff attended a seminar at Scripps Institute to learn about the approaching flood throat. We are in the process of developing a flood mitigation plan. 13.Meeting with other coastal cities and the County to refine preparation plans. 14. Identified 11 areas in the City that ate potential flooding sites. We have a master plan and costs to mitigate those areas. Training Opportunities: 1. A special cable television program (HBTV-3)will be hosted by Councilman Harmon with Fire Chief Michael Dolder.Les Jones. Director of Public Works and Emergency Services Coordinator Gloms Morrison to discuss flood preparedness. The show will be aired on September 4 and shown throughout September and October. 2. The Public Works Department is hosting a workshop with all Orange County Coastal Cities, the County, State CalTrans and the Federal Army Corps of Eagmeers an September 17 to discuss flood mitigation measures that can be taken by all levels of government to lessen the threat 3. A special meeting will be held at the Huntington Beach Central Library in October hosted by the Orange County Emergency Management Organization(OCEMO) and the City of Huntington Beach on El NiHo Preparedness. Speakers that have been invited include: the State Office of Emergency Services, the National Weather Service, and the County Storm Center Manager. The 31 Orange County cities,the County, the special districts and the school districts are invited to discuss the Orange County-wide response to flooding. 4. In November all Police, Fire, Public Works,Marine Safety and Emergency Operations Center personnel will be given a review waiting on Operations Plan N4: Floods. S. In November, a training class will be given to the public on Flood Preparedness for the Hon and Family. Topics will include: how to sandbag, where to get sand and sandbags,what to do should you be evacuated from your home,how to safely evacuate, how to shin off utilities,what to take to a shelter, where we set up shelters, etc. Departments and Volunteers Prepared to Respond: 1. The Public Works Department meinmino Storm Watch Teams that are assigned to each ares of the city. They will go into action as soon as it stars to rain. They monitor all City flood channels, close off any hazardous sweets and areas,post warning signs on flooded streets, and respond to resident's needs. 2. Police Personnel are prepared to warn residents in areas threatened by broken flood charnel: and evacuate them to shelters outside the flooded areas. 3. The Fire Department and Marine Safely personnel are prepared to rescue individuals trappec in flooded intersections and residences. 4. Marine Safety has trained swift water rescue teams should anyone fall into the Santa Ana River. 5. The Community Services Department and the Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT)along with the American Red Cress are prepared to set up shelters to house anyone displaced by flooding. 6. The Fire Department's Cormmunity Emergency Response Teams(CERT)have volunteered to sandbag the homes of any disabled or elderly residents who need assistance. CERT has over 200 volunteers each with 32 hours of disaster response training. They are prepared to respond at a moment's notice to assist the community in a disaster. They also have 45 neighborhood teams in place ready w manage a neighborhood emergency until public safety is available to respond 7. The Fire Department's RACES amateur radio group of 75 volunteers is prepared to respond with radio equipment to provide auxiliary communications to the City public safety personnel. 8. The City's Emergency Operations Center(EOC) is set up and ready to be activated. 75%of the City Managers that respond to the EOC to menage emergencies live within the City and can respond within 30 minutes. The City completed a new disaster plan,which has been approved by the City Council and the State Office of Emergency Services. 220 City personnel and all public safety employees were trained on disaster response in a 10-hour course this year. The City of Huntingtm Beach is gearing up for El Nino. We have a model emergency preparedness program and conduct training for the community on a monthly basis. If I can be of further assistance to you,please to do not hesitate to call Glorria Morrison at 714-536.5980. Get WALL STREET JOURNAL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1997 V'Mariners et Marlins "It's excellent,ands."says Jeff Hewitt, as he books another full load on charter1 Nino: the Fisherman's Friend InlnterleagueMeet, boats atDewy's Locker Sportfishinghem. "What we normally gel on a weekend we Continued p7om First Page when boaters encountered schools of giant No Baseball in Sight are getting every day."Adds Mark Mills, Catalina Island. Re was retrieved, red- squid, more common oft Mexico. Since assistant manager of Dena Wharf Sport- squids spurt water out of their suction " a fishing in Dana Point,Calif.: On Aug.27, Spitzfaced letter r the Olympic tl pic swimmer] called him Mark "we had a record 272 passengers who Spitz latter the Olympic swimmers for the holes when pulled out of the ocean. the El Nino Allen Sport Fishingreal of the afternoon,"Mc Philipps says. Freelance's clients were soaked as they caught yellowtail just three miles off Eager anglers seem to be suffering handed in their catch. "We were catching As Exotic Species $costa the beach." In past years. he says just from an El Ninmmiated malady identified 9W squid a night after mat," he says. To Once-Cooler Waters catching doubleVow.'digita of yelowtail would by tishingexperts."Everybody talks about "That's when we knew there was some- he Thee,fishing I" thing strange this year." The waysis awesome, but the same 'albacore fever;" says Peggy Beckett, On this morning,the ear is as warm as can't always it said for the behavior of c"wnerSan Fran is Huck Finn named after the near By Jim CAatrou fishermen. With some charters over, San Frscal tun it Is that weigh tl after much tasty thew name].Inat 77 degrees of w 1a r,degrees Staff Rearter are BEACH,ALL ]Donnie sounds. They usually weigh a off exi- show name].your0sh,guy�mer,they hit booketl,anglers have been stranded el the fish."Follow your fish,guy!"John Carlin, NEWPoRT BEACH, Calif. — Donnie pounds. They usually loiter oft the Mezi- erans, throwing tantrums. Compete vet- a Whittler, Calif., merchant, shouts al a Brockman, skipper of the s ilea off fthe trans gripe f about having to compete with can coast,but in recent days have shown greenhorn who has allowed a hooked fish Mast when he a Is counte rs El mileseftlhe Go de large number. as far north as the amateurs for space,bout on the water and to dart across two other lines,causing a coast when he encounters El Nhro reflects on crowded boats. Recreational angler Golden Gale Bridge. "It truly Is like an that almost no one had predicted. g illness." Ms. Beckett says. You catch messy tangle. "Son of a ...;' grumbles Cuyealing is Swordfish a commercial fisherman another angler,who had a fish on the line Fish.Schools of them,churning up the of stealing his swordfish at over your u first albacore and you gel t to out but lost it in another tangle. harpoon-point water.Strange fish rarely seen off all,b - otter a d.Mr.Pal dispute over tabor or to your stomach.And you've got to go out nil are down there—opeh,lripletall,bar- y again." "There's too damn many people out weekend.Mr.Page said heated the sword- here;' grumbles 72- ear-old Ed Bunch, racked, the gills tuna. The Freelance, fish, but the rival sate he had spotted IL Melanie Nestaienko, a San Francisco Y packetltome galls within minute anglers, environmental consultant,recently caught men on the cabin He doesn'tboats drops anchor,and within minutes fish are first and redthe brandished a harpoon.Mr.Page a dozen albacore."By the end of the trip,l them on me Freelance. Private boats surrendered[M1e fish. rarely have the sophisticated tracking practically Eying Into the boat. Nearby "He threatened to sink my boat,threat- had a sewing machine arm antl trembling 0 boaters try to horn in on the action. ened m life," Mr. Page reported in a legs, but 1t was the best day you could gear commercial vessels do, so they use "Look at that!" an angry Freelancer y imagine,"she says. the big boats as spotters.This as common, recent column for boaters'gripes in raWest-ting but with so many people chasing the EI easy c as a motorboat edges to within he Philip Ca0elt had an even mare ex- am Outdoor News,a fishing and hunting 'Nino bounty, It Is getting out of hand. easy cast. Crabbing his microphone, the edoeorge 'G was total craziness." bagtraoged athr.The under Ca tt.,lawyer on guys. to Brockman bellows: "Come p bagged i three-pounder Net nobody Three dozen boats are visible from the George Gomez. l Riverside, gunny. Freelance,creating aquatic gridlock. un guys,get ot(us.What do you think this award his ship had ever seen before. store clerk,teal a yellowtail to his gunny- is?Disneyland?" sack on the boat he recently took out,only later identified Department ip Fish one Game "He's gonna drift right on top at us," Actually,the waters here have become to return moments later to find the fish toter Identified It as i l's Baja normally snaps one angler as a bold phone, tr. a fishing fantasy land.The much-feared EI gone. "Somebody stole it,tam;'a pained found south a Mexico's Beta peninsula Buses in. Using his offender away. Mr. Nino, n wamnal current pc Ocean, north- Mr.Gomez says."I couldn't believe It." and only the second documented eGoldus oft South- Brockman shads theepffulda away. yward etca a warming the Pacific Ocean,may ern California since the j Gold Ruse:','Tome Still, It's asua long day aboard retired Ovepealeusness leads to other trou- yet cause are of the global floods,droughts hies.Ken Philipps,assistant skipper of the then,it was says. Oh,just another Bah,"' Freelance. After a long struggle, retired: and disasters that many predict. But so Freelance, recounts how one angler fol- Mr.Catlett says. bank clerk Ann Barnett hauls inf eeBow-- far, g and down the West Coast, It has lowed his cast into the ocean on a trip off For commercial operators like the fish- tail that weighs about a quarter of her own been great for fishing. yearoM Mr. Brockman, the EI Nino ven 100 pounds. ti guess I'm ea the right place M Nino ta acting as aizedWmemoving lIngure boom is a t opportunity.On seven- at the red time,"She beams. ins Carlin sidewalk for hordes at prized t Maxim. A lure i and petit opportunity.One recent has snared so many fish,he begins y late Washington that rarely vendee past Maxim. A morning, he eases the Freelance away aft new catches, with a salute. By wale Washington slate fisherman snagged a from the docks before dawn. crowd of 80 108 y con,the Freelance heads home with marlin last week,there entime In memory runs high among the hold capacity r crawl of 00 I00 yellowtail, e. barracuda, six bonito that a marlin has been seen In (hose passengers;come hold tour rods to maxi- antl 21 sand base. usually chilly waters.Other exotic species mite their chances. The day before. the There Is same disappointment that around California Include mahi mahi and Freelance reported an eye popping hand of more yellowtail weren't caught, but Mr4 bonito,more common off Costa Rica.Their 460 yellowtail and 700 barracuda. Brockman says It's all relative. "We're arrival has triggered an unprecedented Mr. Brockman recalls the June day spoiled."he says."We've had a gmtl day. fishing frenzy, as wane-be Ernest Hem. -" -- We're just used to unbelievable fishing." ingways grab tackle boxes and head out on — charter ships, rented boats, kayaks, jet skis—even surfboards. a/27 Daniel Cayan,director of Scripps'Climate Research Division,spoke first He explained how,over the past few months,oceanographers have developed firm data to indicate an El Nino d current is developing in the Pacific.The trade winds and water temperatures indicate an 1 "event,"as he called it,of 1982 dimensions.1A that year the warm water translated into an'r ts. onslaught of fierce,wet storms that blew in on what's called"the pineapple express." Yet,Cayan quickly added,a similar El Nino current was recorded in 1977—a year of record. drought in California."This is not a ON CA1IfORNIR cast-m-concrete sort of event,"he explained. "There are a lot of qualifiers here.Every event is dlfferenC"As the uncertainties were PEM H. KING explained—air pressure patterns,for example, could push any storms into the middle of the ocean,meaning much rainfall for fish and ships at sea—one could sense frustration building An El Nino ilia among the attendees. They wanted a simple,Farmer's Almanac 1Y i � an prediction;Cay kept interjecting modifiers Is Collllrig IikA"potential"and"perhaps."They snapped outof it,though,when another speaker said his (Possibly) computer models had forecast rainfall in mine cases at"300%,of normal."Now this was more like it This was something to take back to the LA JOLI.A City Council and pry loose some sandbag money, . It was difficult Tuesday to worry about a prediction on which to hang a headline. winter.The sky was blue,the sun hot By 'Zia's a lot more positive,"one fellow in the 10 am.the La Jollabeach was packed with aullenee happily whispered to his seatmate. sunbathers and surfers.Half-naked '4'mean,"he went on,"he's more positively children built castles in the and.Above the negative." beach,however,in a tiny auditorium at Scripps The scientist's bolder tone seemed to rankle Institution of Oceanography,a team of scientists one of the reporters in the auditorium.He stood was working hard to make California imagine a to more or less accuse the speaker of trafficking coming assault of rain,blizzard and Rood. in alarmist statistics."I'm certainly not trying to They caLme loaded,these scientists,with be alarming,"responded Nicholas Graham,who stacks of charts and bar graphs and computer runs the International Research Institute for models.They spoke of the Southern Oscillation Climate Prediction.These were not,he Index and the average daily wind speeds explaned.his predictions:He put data in the recorded at Lindbergh Field.They described computer,and the computer spit back the worrisome shifts in the Pacific trade winds and models.He sounded a bit wounded. spikes in the water temperatures off the Peru coast A fish expert reported an abnormally high i mackerel count An oceanographer talked of `Fetching these scientists on stage,their abnormal waves. foreheads pouring sweet,their audience What it all meant the scientists said,was a frowning at every now of uncertainty,it became coming El Nino;and most Californians Will grasp dear how difficult a dance they had been called at once what that implies.Since the rollicking to perform.Like geologists who study winter of 1982,a winter of swamped beach towns earthquake dynamics,like ultrasound doctors and battered piers,EI Nino bas become pan of the who delve ever deeper into the mysteries of the regional disater shorthand,taking lla place with wgmb.Cayan and his colleagues,in effect,have such potent terminology as Santa Anas and the ev Ived themselves into an ethical dilemma. Palmdale Bulge.To iuvuea news release headlined a more they learn,the more they "impact of Impending El Nino Subject of un erstand about the correlation between ocean Workshop"Is togmaramee a packed louse,which waters and global weather.the more they will is what they got Tuesday at Scripps. fell obligated to hold workshops like this,to The-ow d eamefromahover.Therewere was m.To not share their developing evidence beach town city managers,sheriffs deputies, wduld seem reckless,inhuman. ' county disaster coordinators,oceanfront 4t the same time,long-range weather property owners,park rangers,science foiiUng always will be a dicey business. correspondents and a crew dispatched by Dan I are too many variables.And to sound an l in Rather himself.They came to hear how bad next Eo alarm,only to see nature pull its punch, winter will be.it was,oddly enough,the one is(o risk a seat on the bench next to Chicken question the scientists could not answer. Little and the geologists who kept issuing those 95K earthquake alerts for tiny Parkfield. We could end up,"Cayan acknowledged, "looking a little silly." Pray that they do—and,meanwhile,enjoy the rest of summer,and repair that roof. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Subject Ld Tm�s A147),71 Preparing for Worst Winter in Decades ■ Weather: El Nino is expected to deliver up to three times normal rainfall to Southland. By JULIASCIMERES and CLAIRE V ITUCCI SPECIAL TO THE T IMES 7 _ Prodded by ominous warnings that the mast turbulent El Nino t winter weather in decades may be lurching toward California, rest dents and government agencies are scrambling for ways to survive the expected onslaught of wind, water and waves. Drains and flood channels are being cleaned, levees bolstered. trees chopped, brush cleared. evacuation plans and Red Cross shelter USES renewed, and damage control crews put through special training to help avoid the kind of damage and paralysis inflicted when relentless El Nino storms pounded the West Coast in 1982-81 Marine mammal rescue squads in runxELSEa r t AMele.Tane. Please its WINTER,A17 El Nino of 1982-83 brought storms that split the Seal Beach Pier. WINTER Big Storms Expected Gesdaa.d doomM !ohm dement pabue-wok,If- WWUms, prnldret of thr Pat- Sm Petla and Iagttm Hoch an remvr th Kalmn me tl thr hand- tlem Glen hommonm' group. bracivgllmr the of homrtdl rat-lift areas oimry the 188E-87 "Teat'a when donotalm can P bring timed wom4 Plain m trtin the inure move" dmobeaissbytheuorm,. Mir maff to emergency ... Oce pndlwoo Is that now In In Sin Dirge, Weguatl No and bar scheawM a dladar drill 9mUmber.GCmM+md Novamba rood,ing special"swift river Me- for valunmem. hommwaare ad wW be 200% of mrmaL ad m cue"traWng a they®n serve u a pontcemplo➢en Jamey, Febnury and Much it naEafaquatieSWAT,qual. Nevertheleb, with a public oilbe300%. Work mtl lrslmng continues works mail of omy Gve arewt be 9Mh Is on event 0 be reaYmed spare thmugbaut the region even roomed thu Mallou wlU not have wrath"Graham an&Man,or the thuugh the sky is balmy, the serf the sesame., b handle a elan PammWtyofaiemeev-is300% Smile and th=AU of a tough mriv That mwW be worse tom the of nrmel h m large m II gate a wmiv hand to rmhve ll eaperU aNlvo-Udueea nmta wratham Southey CaWorvm" an corm6 tee corm,sans ml a, 19ffi-81 Slmuar P*encumr bare norm early a September and mat "mr smm era ate w yam from th, director ai tits, alms thre'li marrL-even leage. old Teeym edlapecurg. 'Ibe➢te a Prekeuon Cmua at the flatboat Raonng a u arava sad guua the sal of thtlr We�ammt (Income,adAlmoephmC Assn n' report m bmeaae to rind. Wasiumilon."1 think this,PaMiea- Dave DuueWn a scieva and dsomw �cMb tie not an Is'la Nicol h going to be b big as opasuom olden for the Neural gloom.Rom.sal other sa Nit sere gore of =-81- avltl Weather Service wee liver near amvacmaanedo9mge basin. Amthrr pxWNm Is that the the Good-prone Smta Clan Pova goo A u of a suds- It got UUr almmv rmIA bring the kind of In Ventura County, Plow to Is. mvoo the new. npona tmmresspoundmgwevbmtaeen asses his Dodd Urrunvm come rum" and Ceonny !fare. woo 1982-93.whbh cow the Up "A Untie mltlaUan wW Sealing corn, of Geovany. Hmtlng Is gran waver ever remded In the way."and Nlor o sa E Graham,on Mvoga Pak. He said phom aW Northern Hamispeer. Described El Nis, eemeen n the Smippr asking for btlmaln wen 75%, u the "event of the cedl@y' In INNIlUta.�ai OCeLMOV bYth IA hbmamanavmai Lee fwm[Coanweatha.these Ormge Count! Fps Amemit9 �0e h vamtgh wud going mmms Nd M miWm th damage Capt.Scott��h warAus run- axmmd morn a Nita ad the red to Ca1VmvU, win mpumnin.fr Ceuta b alas ono Is porch leak➢ to o me p red yin`bona thou rd to deaths ad for Rd eves-anion of ran ins plat hers,amb Pry m inn �m me Lin—In W a half m r 4r 000pmple mvpb red plat mud err sells have mmor a ieul by 'Tba signs are men," said "Nam Is the time do Gx It.. 1W%."mtl Alm Smite,opeau® Serr rs researcher Richard Sey- Ilna amd "Dm't anal u the manager for A-1 ham Gldla, In inns. .a= " Glendale Although several ageethe win Two le ared mtl My thaw Bul fr mint h�e�the a- eapahae in gauging wather par. preparearI and Good control of. k' Iuvs have predicted! wet wmta Beizh attended a darling meeting Souther GWorma FEmav h it. b EI Nbo. m tools remade Tuesday el ed a da o hear the tre�ng 5� e�bym In we a that FE NIm Is a peeromemn mat amimm pnWernot abmn El NW 2-yeti-old, mmtlmUMn-dotiar hintmthely tmdenUod and inn —1-n. MMIND aCUL m outage ma.".at system. In preMrENaamulary. amdswomsurvl�alISBS-83.EI None damage am the Srave More,Sea]Hoch Public mmenry S15 minor sad left the- 1 Nhm-4perat fr'the nUla" work,director asd a me.M sends of mu1®m wlmvm pews ovum me Pearremo re. the wmade"old that Seal Bath herders Ism,sear ChrstaI the more hu eaten a variety of pre soommos "By the time El Nis,UU t¢we giver to the imapUy between imardtng WBraddtga water in wW b,able tad arnme problem, rvmm mmots m the PeaGr Oar station, capacity, making sad has, Nmpmm all us"a rim- oG Swill Amema ad rhangn to Wes �va Inble for Madate and PerysPakbmmsafd. atmrphenc temperature, wave begvwng so rig13,000 w rc- Sin Diego G.6 p2etrk Co.is {avam mtl rain ne relit abeg the mmlmmmt mirror by Sept 15. re-tmpmgihmomalan Pa Uwith Wen Con About ISODW aLic yards of send uuut9 names Ihaughout the Alrady, water trmpanture. wW be brought b9 rail(r the arcs mate mtl rdims; Ina damage see- have rhea 4 to 5.0 degrees 1Cel- RJm M the ety poor m hdp at>$at and mWa Rabnlim simi higher than revmai, and pm lert9eYaaldmRl111mIGt planl.aapak®Im and. ]h-1 of the W rmin, contend! In In addltlan to Seal Barb.other CW St .emc g manage. INN 1Lcnz r. aide and mils Orange County bather that are root aordhwr for the city of South Amerman mmmer,an ea- me9tmradtivetohigh-Useamame Sent Diego. her, been ordered to peenotleg savee etmnra rim high ad flooding Include Surfslde, prepare a canted bate phv for rairdelland Gooding. Bois,M.State Beaeit Hunting. the aty Court isa plete onto May arcs In Souther CaWr. tin State Beach and pmtlom of evae-um Plena Red one abet. ma are null retailing damage left Dana pmnlmd senaemente. Im ad etgmeehtg Iv,We U m by El Nlm in 1987 al other Workers In Orange County', Intl- earthen Moll channels m wins Norma, in rtanI ymn mate puke and bemires system the waily floodMI 'Nunn Rlva Redondo Beach hen here reNann8 will pay time attention m Ude VWe9neu the Merin brit. corm drams ass inlets In raid-- toarea Rio ueb as beeepeefnp tin men in um hard If,by the devastauagUam0:nN with meet meegmcy ommals In San Diego ream g-mted by El Nlvn In 19M sort ma Mike Tape.send ranger Ease working with their aid by rempor moms tease years ye_ freanparkath Cnilge Cmmty .=•m TmarU in help that age -we'll take whamver precam metmrus Kudslidam1993 k1OM "We an ha ale moody rain all urn we art"Tope and.Tut wttb dome of pants In 7%.'e poem winter long. That's not the pmb- Mame Nature thee'a cot a eat we neighboremtls like." sail Retlnnda &sch aty ca on.M prepanusn. we might NmeSm Cebrim famhW neigh• Kammer Pam Camolly. "If's the bulls up =a brash anew, with lomcad of Pasadea Gler, real. big 1O}yar corm wan roomed her oi W th help protect the dots ere banklv8 on mein rota- about" bathbbourjlwdicUva" gwry tenpeons tree and on the -Some mega-agemdes emb m big eWverU Quilt aituadisewm c,afta ung to IN. at., wen the Ins Angeles Comt9 Depart. 199r deluge Idt Menderms knee- Tbara weir repman grit area reso mint a} Public Works erd the deepen mud Is use fire Gavial Yaaar.gabae Ian city. Department of Wine and hats in to ia,la, Ton, Parer h rise w Poer. eaprsb casfldence that agTf you have bibualnW_mr �o'1tle05rtmeraea pasta Sara 11 b armg,Comb ad amn+mrinm theyarMayerenewlUtmoy,but to 10 leaches a dayeve'm- prime, eager, in Reams Oaa smaller agencies with smaller erel days—everybody better Traq lahnee m rim pars aad e1u bodgesamemaseme waodroutrmlptrtus"saldllnde waenh Vwrma. El Nino Is A Bad Boy - Microsoft Internet Explorer Paee 3 of 4 World News Tonight Com smart solutions to tough problems. GO Worst Pattern in More Than a Century Bad Boy Is Back _ and siwlPs caonrrt,pars Coral pmperrydamage water reeisde 9 Crops fail fi tmoical starvation blow ryclbries F�hd indLttry fktods,evastated onqtn Iandsides Drovit,drsease, and bush Isms malnuaibn New Website on Global Disturbances caused by El Nino in 1982-83 brought devastation from Warmino Austalia to India to the Pack Northwest of the United States Columnist (ABCNEWS.com/Source: Smithsonian Institution) By E.J. Gong Jr. Lee , on El ABCNEWS.com Nino Special El Nino means little boy in Spanish but it's Report: anything but child's play. It's a freak weather Interpreting El ABCNEws• condition that can throw entire regions of the Ni=o Morton Dean globe into climatic disarray. Floods, droughts, explains El s pestilence, famine and illness often accompany Nina•s effects P P Y El 939k favii Nino. 9Re IVideo And now for the bad news, as reported by Morton (download Dean on ABC's World News Tonight. Scientists say this In RealPlaverl year could bring the severest El Ntno of the century. E-mail That's troublesome ABCNEWS.com considering that in 1983, El Nifo was responsible for 1,500 deaths and $8 billion in damages worldwide, including AecNEws' heavy flood damage in Southern California. El Nino effects in Malibu, Calif., Brian Rooney on 1983(Vince Streano/Corbis) El Nino s "I think we might see economic some very, very wild weather," says Steve Zebiak, an El impact 920k lavi) Nino ex err and senior scientist at Columbia University's 908k Imovl P RealVideo Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. "It has the potential (download to be simply devastating." RealPlaverl Jagadish Shukla, head of the Washington-based Institute of Global Environment and Society, told a scientific gathering in Geneva that the phenomenon, Thursday, August 28, 1997 8:10 AM EI Nino Is A Bad Boy - Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 3 of 4 y scientific gathering in Geneva that the phenomenon, - which disrupts global rainfall and wind patterns, caused N think we record high sea-surface temperatures in July. might see some very, Event of the Century very wild The weather pattern could be"the climate event of the weather' century," Shukla told delegates at Geneva's Conference —steve zebtak, on the World Climate Research Programme. The Er Who expert conference is being attended by 300 scientists from more than 100 countries. El Niho is an abnormal state of the ocean-atmosphere system in the tropical Pacific which causes exceptionally warm and long-lived ocean currents. It affects the weather not only locally but can also can cause droughts or flooding in far-flung regions. In just the past few months, scientists have seen temperatures increase by up to 5 degrees off the South American coast. In ocean terms, that's a dramatic and - alarming increase, says Wayne Higgins of the Climate Prediction Center in Camp Spring, Md. Domino Effect This warmth spurs tropical storms over the ocean. These heavy storms set off a weather domino effect. Some areas that don't usually get rain are hit hard, while wet areas dry up. But most significant is the effect on the jet stream, which drives worldwide weather patterns, Higgins says. Under El Nifio, the jet stream splits into two. That means fewer hurricanes for the Gulf states, drier winters in the Northwest and unusually wet weather in California, according to Bob Sheets, the former director of the National Hurricane Center who is now a consultant for ABC News. But there is good news from all this, Sheets says. The change in weather means that winds move from east to west and are sheering off storms in the tropics that could potentially become hurricanes. . Global Impact In global terms, it means Australia, Indonesia, Brazil, India and Africa could see drought conditions and as a result, possible famine. Meanwhile Argentina, South China, Brazil and Japan could get pounded with heavy rains that could lead to flooding and sickness due to water contamination and mosquito-bome diseases, according to Michael Glantz, senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Thursday, August 28, 1997 8,10 AM El Nino Is A Bad Boy-Microsoft Internet Explorer Page 4 of 4 senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. "We're talking about the potential for problems", says Glantz. "We can't predict exactly what's going to happen. But one thing is certain: you can't take El Nifto for granted."O CgWVUIWAWC Yg6Ynaw �� CaporYbn AC�iphb�v�6 TM mYVYIAYYMmpppBeAa6 Ems0uet CTAAW AV6 �AMYYL@ROY4YIIIM NmVA>.m. Thursday, August 28, 1997 8:10 AM �. M°e5 Ocean recreation ° , 2 A *J46q Orange County , California , 33'a- In Orange County soy pmu ArtlllclelRw/ i i /- T he C o u nty Sa n itati o n Di stri cts of Ora n ge C o u n ty race ntly completed a survey of the recreational uses of the ocean in coastal Orange County. There were four major beaches in the study area,which extended from Huntington Harbor y to Newport Harbor. Summer beach usage was five times greater than winter beach usage. Over 99 percent of all R. a. - water-contact ocean recreation off Huntington and anm 33°35' Newport Beach takes place within 300 yards from shore. vity takes ot all inthisa The Districts conduct an ongoing Ocean Monitoring takes place in this area oyy/� ,m 9 9 9 The remaining 0.3 r of all Program which provides us with the information needed actwi ies lake place in these to protect these important recreational uses. areas. " _ _sm 118°05' 1181,001 117°55' Surfing & 2.8 million people surf each year. Swimming 2.7 million people swim in the ocean each year, which includes body surfing and body boarding. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California Surfing and swimming takes place within 300 yards from shore. [714] 962-2411 In the winter over seventy percent of mailing address: all water usage is from surfing. P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California '°% Ricn 0Ae 9000 people windsurf or paddle Wind Surfing & 92728-8127 �,�°�y ''.0e board each year. Paddle Boarding street address: j Wind surfing normally takes place 10844 Ellis Avenue within a mile from shore, while Fountain Valley, California paddle boarders are normally found 92708-7018 •+ within 1000 yards from the shore. Jet Skiing 2400 people jet ski each year. OCEAN RECREATION USAGE IN ORANGE COUNTY _ _ Jet skiing normally takes place _ within 2000 yards from shore. n,.,.eti..l esaa y.Me saalaa0yam. 100oyards- la mlw _Z Ad11vi1y 1 mile -=_ Somng 2,mA00 w,00o 0 0 swmand.9 1,700,000 0 0 0 wind Suring a 3A00 3.90 zow No 2000 people kayak each year. Kayaking Paddleedanding Jet Skiing 0 5,000 S00 100 Kayaking normally takes place Kayaking 1,s00 000 no 0 within a mile from shore. - sCUBAa goo 700 e00 We ��jr,w�i' SnarkNing Sa MO 'AO S00 100 Walar terSkl Skling Other 100 0 0 0 Total 5,4;B00 97,000 3,400 1.000 SCUBA Diving Approximately 2000 people SCUBA & Snorkeling dive or snorkel each year. SCUBA diving normally takes place In Summary within 3 miles from shore and at specific Twenty two million people went to Newport and Huntington identified sites. Beaches in 1996. Snorkelers are normally found within Five and a one half million people enterthe water each year. 300 yards from shore. Summer beach use averages about five times winter beach use. Eleven types of water-contact ocean recreation were identified: surfing,swimming, board sailing, paddle boarding,jet skiing, kayaking, SCUBA diving,catamaran sailing, snorkeling, fishing Around 1500 people sail catamarans Catamaran from boards and kayaks, and water skiing. and water ski each year in the study Sailing Over ninety-nine percent of all water-contact ocean recreation area. involves surfing and swimming. Catamarans are normally found Limited water-contact recreation of any type occurs beyond 1,000 within three miles from shore and yards from shore. water skiers typically stay within Most ocean recreation involves contact with surface waters. 1,000 yards of shore. • Only SCUBA divers have extended contact with subsurface waters. Ocean Recreation in Orange County - b +eation Offshore in Orange County ♦Where offshore and how often do people paddle, sail, surf and dive? ♦Are boaters and bathers at risk because of the Orange County Sanitation Districts' discharge? +eation Survey ♦Area— Newport Harbor to Huntington Harbor ♦ Near shore and offshore activities ♦ Sources of information +ge County Recreation ♦ Surfing, swimming, boating, diving ♦ Highlights for 1996 ♦ 22 million visited beaches ♦ 5.5 million were within 1,000 feet from shore • 40,000 were between 1,000 feet and 1 mile ♦ 1,000 were farther than 1 mile from shore +ng and Swimming ♦ 99.7% of water recreation is swimming and surfing ♦ Includes: swimming, snorkeling, board surfing, body surfing and body boarding ♦ Over 85% of all water recreation is in summer +ng i ♦ Includes: sailing, paddling and watercraft where you are near or in the water ♦ 5,000 were within 1,000 feet from shore ♦ 9,000 were more than 1,000 feet but less than 1 mile from shore ♦ Approximately 700 were beyond 1 mile 2 r +BA Diving ♦ Less than 2,000 divers per year in our area ♦ Virtually all divers near shore or at artificial reefs ♦ Area generally of poor visibility for divers ♦ Sport diving not allowed at oil platforms or at Districts' outfall Recreational Study Area each Q 100 yds 300 yds}5.5 million ._ Q 1,000 yds)40,000 1 mile outfall E3 2 miles 1,000 - Q 3 miles AN N 3 +e Studies ♦ Modeled movement and dynamics ♦ Confirm water quality data ♦Assumptions e View of Effluent Plume Water Surface Effluent Plume moving with ocean current Ocean ------- Current Diffuser Initial mixing zone Port I oil" Ocean Bottom 4 tewater Plume Behavior Various Ocean Conditions Unstratified Stratified Winter Summer �r Quality Standard Ocean Plan ♦ Total Coliform ♦ No more than 1,000 per 100 mL ♦ No more than 20% of the samples greater than 1,000 ♦ Fecal Coliform ♦ No more than 200 per 100 mL ♦ No more than 10% greater than 400 5 r Surface — Unstratified Months ,pp YI 30pyds Beach Beach �'000 Area where total coliform ,mde s standard is predicted outfau 21h0 to be exceeded es A 3 N s Surface — Unstratified Months 300 Ydstl5Beach ary ' Beach 1 mile Huntington y Newport Beach �'p00 Area where fecal coliform �mry standard is predicted p outfall to be exceeded 3 s N 6 r Surface — Stratified Months 300Yds on/ a 1' August 1 mile Z. Newport Beach 000 Y Area where fecal coliform standard is predicted Outfall ? aa to be exceeded ea N Subsurface — Stratified Months 100 300 Yds a 60 ft emmr 130 ft Area where fecal coliform standard Imlre is is predicted Outfall miea to be exceeded 3 P?hQ N 7 / face Strade / Months 300 May \Bolsa Chica (75 ft deep) Beach a Hti 7 mile c' Q 60 ft \ ym Huntington Area whe colifo is p Beach �� Newport Beach p _. . +tified t *reation is Safe Offshore range County ♦ 22 million people go to the beach ♦ 5.5. million boaters and bathers are within 1,000 feet of shore ♦ 40,000 surfers,divers and boaters will be found more than 1,000 feet offshore • 1,000 boaters and divers are more than 1 mile offshore ♦ Over 85%of recreational activity is in summer *reation is Safe Offshore range County r....o ♦ The effluent plume surfaces only in winter and remains more than 3 miles offshore • During summer, spring and fall, the effluent plume is generally 75 feet or more below the surface and stops its shoreward movement when 8 hits the ocean bottom ♦ The few (poor visibility) dive sites appear to be outside the plume's usual path 9 � ]1 9 •EpJ �tA'E So +,,q ' July 2, 1997 —3 b MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Ooten Director of Operations & Maintenance Blake Anderson Chief Operations Officer FROM: Ed Torres t'/4 -P Air Quality & Special Projects Division Manager SUBJECT: Summary of SUI Pulse Power Test Project The pulse power ("Star Wars") test project has been discontinued as of June 11. As the attached project summary explains, we did not demonstrate any positive effects from the pulsing treatment. The contract with SUI provided for a startup period, after which CSDOC would start paying rent for the equipment and the performance guarantees would become effective. By mutual agreement, the startup period was extended to allow us to complete the pilot digester tests. In the end, the rental payments never started, so we paid no money to SUI during the course of the test. SUI has been contacted about removing their equipment from our plant. This is expected to occur within two weeks. A more detailed write up of the project that has been prepared for the 1997 WEFTEC Conference is available. Also, I would like your opinion about whether these test results should be presented to the OMTS committee. ET/hh H eWDTA%0M 10%TORRESWIPULSE MEM Attachment CSDOC • P.O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley. CA 92728 a127 9 (714)962 2411 Summary of SUI Pulse Power("Star Wars") Project The effects of using pulse power technology to enhance anaerobic digester operation were investigated in full-scale and pilot-scale tests. Pulse power treatment was claimed to increase the methane production and decrease the solids output from a digester without sacrificing throughput; there also was the possibility of reducing the pathogen levels in the treated sludge. Results from other tests in Florida and Alabama had shown 15.50% increases in the digester methane output and a 29% decrease in the polymer required for sludge dewatering. The equipment supplier guaranteed a 40% increase in our methane production. The test program had two distinct parts. Full-scale testing was done from 11/96 through 6197 using digesters P and S operating as part of the normal processing train at Plant 2. Pilot-scale testing in the P2 laboratory was done from 3/97 through 6/97 to investigate conditions that, for reasons of time or potential disruption to normal plant operations, could not be explored in the full-scale digesters. In the full-scale testing, only the TWAS fraction of the digester feed was pulsed. In the pilot-scale tests, two general differences from the full-scale test were investigated. First, different fractions of primary sludge and TWAS in the feed were tried, and second, both the primary sludge and the TWAS were pulsed. Using these manipulations, a matrix of ten experimental and control conditions was established to investigate: (1) possible pulsing effects differences on primary sludge and TWAS, (2) interactions between primary sludge and TWAS when pulsed, and (3) effects of pulsing on the dewaterability of the residual digested solids. The gas production and compositions from the full-scale digesters were monitored during a two- month baseline period and a nearly five-month pulsing test period. Despite various modifications to the equipment by the manufacturer to improve its performance, pulsing did not produce any apparent increase in the amount of gas produced by the pulsed digester. The data also showed no sustained difference between the methane contents of the pulsed and control digesters. Near the end of the test period, five pairs of TWAS samples were collected over three days immediately before and immediately after the pulsing chambers. Three sample pairs were tested for total and fecal coliform levels, and two sample pairs were tested for active coliphages as indicators of active viruses. Neither group of test results indicated that pulse power treatment is an effective means of reducing active pathogen levels in treated sludge. For all four feed compositions tested in the pilot digesters, the gas production did not vary significantly between the pulsed and control cases. Regardless of whether pulsing was used for 100%, 75%, or 50% of the feed, or whether the feed contained or lacked primary sludge, the gas production was not improved by the pulse power treatment. Similarly, analyses of the gas compositions indicated that pulsing did not increase the digesters' methane production. To test for dewaterability effects, sludge samples were withdrawn on four different days from each of the pilot digesters and tested. These tests did not show any reduction in polymer requirements for flocculation of the residual sludges. Overall, no beneficial effects of pulse power treatment on digester operation or solids processing were demonstrated in this project. The equipment manufacturer has not offered any explanation for our lack of positive results, but they agree that we conducted a fair and extensive test of their process. H:IW P.OTAIOM V 410SROW NIPULSEP W RISUISUMRY.W PD TFM FaxAlert 00%00%00 Friday.Augur!22, 1997 AMSA Yokes Support for Draft Municipal Settlement Polity AMSA submitted comments earlier this week in strong support of EPA's Draft Municipal Settlement Policy and urged the Agency to adopt it in final form as soon as possible. The policy was noticed in the July 11, 1997 Federal Re 'star. AMSA believes this policy will equitably and expeditiously resolve Superfimd liability issues for local Aovemments,school boards and small businesses thatstem from STren'municipal solid waste(MSW)/municipal sewage sludge(MSS) activities. Once the policy is adopted,it should ease the litigation that has saddled cities and towns because they owned or operated municipal landfills,or sent garbage or sewage sludge to landfills that were also used by generators and transporters of industrial hazardous wastes. In its comments,AMSA supported the 20%baseline settlement cap for local government owners/operators and the unit cost cap of$3.05/ton as the baseline settlement amount for generators/transporters ofMSW/MSS. AMSA also recommended that EPA consider lowering these amounts to further limit municipal liability. A proposed hardship provisions and allowances for in-kind contributions,which consider the ability of the municipality to pay,were cited as positive steps in this direction. In addition,AMSA urged that three aspects of the proposed policy be unproved: 1)the policy should apply to local government owners and operators of MSW-only sites as well as co-disposal sites;2)the policy should apply to local governments at sites where there are not other viable parties; and 3)the policy at co-disposal sites should include sewage sludge incinerator ash,in addition to MSW and sewage sludge. Superfuod Liability Relief for POTWa Still of Issue The House Transportation& Infrastructure Committee is expected to take up Superfund reauthorization in September. For over a year,AMSA has been actively engaged in discussions with committee staff regarding POTW liability for hazardous waste that may have escaped through the collection system. Recently, key Committee staff have contacted the AMSA to accelerate negotiations regarding our proposed amendment to remedy this matter. Meetings with Hill staff are planned for the near future and will begin next week > There will be no FasAkn next week,due to the approaching Labor Day holiday.The FasAlert will resume on September 5. > Registration materials and program for the 1997 joint AMSA-EPA Pretreahnenr Coordinators'Workshop in Norfolk,VA on November 5-7 were sent this week via W797-19 A . And nntirr.on AMSA'c CSO Pe.mit Negotiation Wnrkshop, ,Wft her 25 26 in Cinoinn* Olio will be in tho moil coyly mad wook Plaase rwra AW A..g. az :. x..�..-.......:..........pj. 'I r ago rr...c..i r. OFFICERS DIRECTORS STANLEY E. SPRAGUE WAYNVE A CLARK MUNICIPAL GENERAL ...ACERrt.EA...1. o .EHT WATER KENNETH H. WITT .V. DISTRICT CATHLEEN M. HARRIS ",A Pn ES,YERT OF....ETART WILLIAM F. DAVENPORT .. GRANGE RUSSE LLTG. BENPENS H.E. 'BILL' NARTGE COIJIVTY ATTORNEY ROBERT J. HUNTLEY P.O. BOX 20895 • 10500 ELLIS AVENUE • FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728 • (714) 960-6058 FAX (714) 964-9389 August 19, 1997 CC: MDrn 14C,MMc, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Mr,JFi P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 #,NjW' F, Attn: Ms. Mahin Taiebi File Original A Commendation for Mike Masterson, Source Control 'In July, I called CSDOC for help in finding a source of rising groundwater. I was put in contact with Mike Masterson, a Source Control Inspector. He responded promptly, and arranged for a trip to the field to collect sewer and storm drain samples. I was impressed by the hi-tech sampling equipment CSDOC has, and by Mr. Masterson, who"knows his stuff' and collected samples quickly and professionally. This was my first contact with CSDOC Source Control. I was very pleased. Sincerely, Lee Jacobi Senior Engineer MEMBER AGENCY OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This letter was sent to all State Senators. Phares (714)952.2411 maleng.ddre.e: September 4, 1997 P.O.Ba,B127 Fourtain valley,CA 927288127 The Honorable (FirstNamen «LastNamen sv.rt address: The State Capitol 1 OB44 Ellis Avenue p Fan,min valley,CA Room aAddressla 9270e-701e Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Senator aLastNamen: Member The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California opposes AB 940, Agencies which amends the present law relating to progress payments on all public works 0 contracts. While the current law provides that retentions be a minimum of 5%, this old.. proposed measure would set the retention at a maximum of 5% of progress Anahalm payments. The Sanitation Districts awards upwards of 30 major public works Brea contract each year,with a capital facilities budget greater than $50,000,000. We Buena Perk Gyp esa necessarily must take all measures possible to protect the taxpayers and Foantaln vangy ratepayers, by ensuring that our public works construction projects are completed HunengronFid IBeh in a timely and satisfactory manner. To set the retention at the lower level of 5% ac Irving places the agency at risk that sufficient funds will not be available to assure the L.Hera satisfactory completion or correction of defects. Le Palma Loa Alamitos NawPorc Beach Our experience over many decades has been one of extreme success and good Orange Pkcanea will with the construction industry, and we have never had expressions of concern sanest ants or disagreement with the standard protocol of 5%-10% retention. It is our belief Baal Beach that the construction Industry well recognizes the need for those limits and has stanWn r.en accepted it as being in the ordinary course of business. It would appear that the Was Pen: reduction of retention to a maximum of 5% is not warranted and places public Yorba Linda monies at risk. :aunty of Orange We respectfully request your"No"vote on AB 940. We appreciate your ia.rcary ol.alabs consideration of our views on this matter. Costs Mesa Gorden Grote 1 Midway City watts, oitsbricea Donald F. McIntyre General Manager Irvine Rench DFM:jt A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Env,ronment Since 1954 Donald F. McIntyre Published by DART Communications Task Team September 4, 1997 DAw DARTBOARD 1461� DART: DISTRICTS ASSESSMENT AND REINVENTION TEAM APT where Bob Bell demonstrated the Engineering&Management RJN windows CMMS version. Services(GEMS)to act as a Don McIntyre, Penny Kyle and Although the data was not live, it general consultant for the AW F Chris Dahl joined team members simulated work order processing, and CMMS teams. GEMS for a tour of American Honda equipment asset tracking, report speciality is in designing business Motor Co., Inc. in Torrance.The building,etc. practices and methodologies of purpose of the field trip was to The team continues to identify running maintenance divisions for gather data on their record's system requirements and prepare large industrial and wastewater management program.The team documentation supporting applications.They focus, not only also sent a letter to Honda interviews with District personnel. on the specific plant maintenance requesting information on(inns Joe Parks, CMMS team leader environment, but also larger, that specialize in records storage. gave a progress report to the AWF global issues and interrelationships The team after discussion set a team.He discussed the CMMS revolving around maintaining large projected completion date of team's progress and how the plants like ours.The first item on September 18, 1997 for the record different computer systems at the GEMS list is a complete evaluation retention recommendation's Districts cannot talk with each of our current set of maintenance report. Some of APTs goals are to other, i.e.,CMMS to warehouse. practices and the existing, larger, implement policies and procedures Districts environment. Using this that are clear,easy to follow and I2Q evaluation as a baseline,the make the process of records teams will be working with GEMS management more efficient. Jim Harris reported that requests to design both the transititional and for quali ications(RFOs)with a final,operational and maintenance AWF TEAM draft scope of work for the J-42 organizational structure and work Project were recently mailed out to practices that will ensure that we The AWF team continues to focus twenty different firths.A process remain competitive in the changing on skill base pay/broad banding. mapping order that TPIT will follow wastewater industry. Some team members assembled from the automation activities of J- a document recommending 42 is:Digestion-primary and General Physics is a contractor sequencing of broad banding, skill- TWAS sludge pumps to holding brought on board by the Training& based pay,cross training, gain digesters. Primary-splitter boxes Education division to assess and sharing,employee annual review to primary effluent samplers and make recommendations for systems and field process teams discharge of sludge pumps. developing a cross-training or enterprise teams. It describes Preliminary-plant headworks program for O&M and Plant and development strategies and including MSPs.Dewatering- Collections Facilities Maintenance. recommends that the whole biosolids and truck loading scale. During the first phase,they package should undergo a review Secondary-PEPS, RASNVAS, interviewed more than 100 process to ensure that all the TWAS and trickling fitters to COBS employees at the technician level, components fit. wetwell.COBS/Ouffall. Utilities- gathering information on types of water,air and electrical systems. equipment used,job duties and CMMS TEAM responsibilities. From this POTPOURRI information, General Physics will August 20, 1997,team members prepare and issue a training met in the CMMS group area In August, DART hired Global design document in September. amsa GoalNb Association of MelrapWi.n GJ.r. R.demerm Metropolitan amid of Gr.m.Qlmgo,it Sewerage Agencies Way Aaudme V kho.At.PM trigs m"am'Ok September 8, 1997 Beaww Kurm Iblial. Give 8ubddaNa Vd.r Depemnan,Fq Sege fry "'Iro of ham hblic n'`Pugh Patrick McNelly Wi yraz Gaunt...1.M Education and Training Specialist Dial,Brown Gar Gaae Mfva Diaamal County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127, 10844 Ellis Avenue b Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 MrMNy.w RabM 1.Omamen baab va sou.as Dear McNelly: cammi.rm.d,w Jab. F. Fiag.ald �lhe n MA`g"•r R.a°"°' Please accept our thanks and appreciation for your contribution as an author of an i lF.a se.ate G.W.Hann of article in AMSA's special section in the September 8, 1997 issue of Engineering WmAfavm county.OR News-Record(ENR). I'm sure that you will agree that the section, Choosing Gamin it Gam. Competitiveness: The Reengrneering Revolution in Wastewater Management, is quite M ropnRbJ!iwmr Grand,unry RY impressive. This can be attributed to both the experience and knowledge of the Harold J. German authors as well as the content of the articles. I have enclosed 20 copies of Choosing s.werag.a Wm.,Board of Now Orleans, u Competitiveness with this letter for your distribution. Gum.0 Gorr cry 0 um.Car Want oaw mmma.l O CaNml Through AtvISA's special section our collective message will be carried out not only SoSaran or,Md Harm.n lu fia, to ENR's paid circulation of over 81,000 readers, but will be distributed during Yfamw°"'DSF•m"ml,CA APWA's annual conference and to the 15,000+registrants at WEFTEC'97 in late Mama Wad' anwee, Recbmarion October. Diarid,CO Rabsm S.Holland tno carom count Wires We greatly appreciate your time and commitment to this project. Again, many thanks. Aumaay,NJ Mkrae 0,Lamm runt 8I00Ylaeplsr Sincerely, Wiry.AR Midml meobmy Nieaba.ugb County Pubic URai.Dro ammnr,n Rabin P.Miil. count smr.ron Diamds of en KIrk ba Mo.cowiF,CA Jm l-Obm Executive Director factRi.r Welsr Radamo i.. Dbvio.It Paul Pim.0 ENCLOSURES Nor aganaen Bay Wef°r Qualify Management Didnd Commiaaion,Al Jam.MToay Deeem.m er W.er6srwi eSemis. N.M1wlb 6 Dwidam Cam,.11NN Jnnn CDnFtecN<YI AVCnYC, JW Afoul Thermodagard ,Suily i 10 Groin Bay M.r•Rali.n B.w.roa Drdno,vn Vlhshingwn,DC 200365302 Damie R.Vllr.ler 202.833.AMSA Nomglm Road= smifnion Didrbf,VA 202.833.4657 SAX u�.arena svec AL ADVMnsIwc scene• • • • � 7 vil it wq eaivag.play ua LL.ra.�a waTwZyaxuuy/Opy.7awalul ayl uo sn ysu.a pp6p1[pepE Ilao uopauuo{u(aowuoj -apurppoer suo,j=j oZ{ueyl wow woq sxpuawwoa pue sluarlp 6uwas r IIIHWZHO no/f mj uollnjos jg6u ayj algwasse of jayja6oj*pom ueo am moq weal of sn 6eo siawolsno jnoS,f Mjes no f dlaq pue 'spaau anbNa mo f ssaippe of uopeujgwoo ul jo djjenpjnlpuj saojAlaslo 96urr jjnj a nOAs/ajjo saluedwoa jo AIP4 s.77lp WZHO suollerado pue'6ujauml 'Juawa6euew '6ulAaul6ua '6uIuueld Bulpnpul — ssaujsnq Apljln jalemalsem pue jalem eyl jo sued Ile w aouauadxa pueq-my mo to asneaaq amen leogaerd ppe suojjnjos mo •s;aed ano ;o wns ayj ueyl ejow noA iollo aM i ., - } _ *w�, L P 4 r a i V CHOOSING COMP"STIVENESS COMPETITION TAKES CENTER STAGE FOR AMSA AGENCIES By Cecil fue-fling,President of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies and Director of Research aid Development,Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago And Kenneth I.Rubin,president and CEO,Apogee Research,Inc. ver the past few years,private opera Other substitutes besides managed corn preference to repayment of local over federal Loss have stepped up pressure on pub. petition also exist,however.In an effort to investments upon sale of a wastewater treat. be wastewater utilities to do a better explore them,AMSA and AMWA are jointly ment plant built in part with federal funds.Also job at less cost Our challenge is to preparing a handbook for water and waste- about that time,large British,French,and to a demonstrate public willingness and abairy to water utilities entitled Thinking,Getting,and lesser extent.Spanish water companies began better the best of the private sector.We do SIOng Competitve:A ft IFfic Sector flanddaok parenering seriously with U.S firms to enter have advantages:we know our faci ifies betty It explores inter"processes that have result- the U.S.market.They believed that public than any private competitor,we don't have to ed In significant improvements in operating operators in the U.S.had grown Complacent in charge our customers to cover profits and efficiency,reduced operating costs, and more their monopoly position and that private opera taxes as do private companies;and oar Panda productive work forces in both large and small Cons Could offer significant savings. mental motivation is public service. water and wastewater utilities.We plan a series In many cases they were right According Our business is the environment but we of regional workshops based on the handbook to several sources,the number of private con, also treat the environment as a business. begging in the spring Of 1998 tracts has grown considerably,to perhaps 400 Unlace most businesses,however,wastewater WE UROM" to 500 today.Natually,an elected official seek- Treatment typically is not delivered in a crumpet. It is commonly understood that prior Lo ing to balance a budget and raise Capital for itive setting. An average household cannot the This Reform Act of 1986,most privatization needed infrastructure,social programs,or eda buy a pound of our product from a dozen deals were driven both by the potential to prop cation has to look seriously when savings of stores or select the quality and price that best it from the undertaking and by potential lax millions of dollars are promised. meets individual needs and budgets Instead, benefits available to,private owner/operators of THE CIIAA RRINNE our service is a"natural monopoly,"where wastewater facilities After the new law elimi. Water and wastewater utility managers because of high fixed costs of plant and equip Haled most of the dx benefits,private interest did not remain Complacent for long.Most are ment and economies of scale,it makes Sense in owning wastewater treatment plants prepared to enhance the challenge.They view for one firm to deliver the service across a dropped off precipitously.Private companies it as a maser of managing change:changing broadgeographiral region. Continued to pursue opportunities to operate culture, incentives,the labor/management AMSA has long recognized that,despite wastewater treahment plants only where they relationship,and of course,specific work prat the absence of market signals,wastewater of& could offer services cheaper than the public tices.Ultimately,most public managers are fies must Constantly seek to deliver high-qua! sector or otherwise secure a Contract for opera Convinced they can find innovative ways to rap ty,efficient services.In 1996,AMSA published dons that met their criteria for Capital invest. ashen on their advantages Evaluating fh'varividon:An AMSA Cheekfut, ment and assumption of risk Traditionally,a ndhue of public service, which helped utility managers and elected of , Consequently,the market for private Con, sometimes without sharp regard for price,has cials address the question,"What is the most WICt operations grew slowly but steadily in the prevailed at municipal authorities.Increasing. efficient way for my jurisdiction o provide the late 1980s and early 1990s,from less than 50 to ly,this is changing.Topdown management is full range of wastewater utilty services?"It perhaps 100 in 1990(no precise Counts exist)- reversing itself,more and more utilities are examined internal reengineering,contract All this changed after the 1992 Presidential instead trying to work in a more botom-up operations,and asset sales.The checklist con, Executive Order (E.O. 12803),which gave fashion. Compensation based on performance eluded that all three options have the potential to reduce the Cost of operating a wastewater TABLE OF CONTENTS treatment plant in the near-term.But questions COERV"mON TANU UNEER"AS[FOR (IONUB ..AN AGENCY ERAA[DESR IN remain about the stability of cost Savings, A AG[NCIU ......................2-3 MFOUM........................2.20 transfers of Costs elsewhere within local gov- A Cart TO THE"mtC""OR ..............F NOW TO DO BUSINESS r A R[[NMNIER[D emme it,risks to the environment,and effects FLORIDA UTIITR EXARU MO ITRX ANN"...........................2-23 On emploYces.Only by considering all of these [ER9IOESEf .........................2.1 UP DOW ROM To BUT FBI TABG"WRX issues can public and private alternatives be MnTD{ W .....................2-" accurately Compared. GMG[CCUN"FINDS SERVICES[T AR[ N"To CHANGE ......................22 ME D USES 00 9ROGRAER TO BENEFIT Earlier this Year,AMSA in collaboration mI aUloOm....................2-zO with the Association of Metropolitan Water null(vAu"TRIu EMPRINIURUI U9ROAeH TO VUBUC smwa..........2.11 ERIR -DUE ARIAanINES WITH JOINT Agencies (AMWA) published Managed Cam- "cacti ..........................Faz petition:Developing and Responding to RFQs m nons a ERUN MU-.AU MM and RFfS. BY focusing on why managed corn G[N[RAT[S ION"UN MM .........1-Ix CPMION- 0ONSULTRITE7�[f CHO IINDIOKG MURpetition may make sense and how a utility can Af TOM[ERBM(U BIG CRANGU ....2-16 rmlru INI GUUDN ...............A06 organize such a process,AMSA has drawn B"UR rxromnow"ants AR[BUILT ON IN"R RDM—GMUR mlM CD ON attention to key issues such as(1)neither pub BUSINESS SUNDMWM .............2.19 1 UAROM CONCERN ................2-37 ac nor private operations are intrinsically more RECUT THE AUTHOR]®Pwva(Xmmivpuna),iapr0miowl Conk.alNtio.ond/aaumfmnnrDNorbmvim. efficient than the other. (2) competition must °"driovov..S"hv4b.M. "1"m"atia"a1B"n"mbm"iti`c�R`waml pm u,w,dnawoea6o., be consistently fair in allparticipants:and (3) &cam Umwmn Fohrw`,A,mF�unebryM US 3enams RilnNSonr,ammMgneSmWe ranoittro La. A fortyn, vwnaMmnm.mmlalaMmerp ieva Str sun un.en.n mmomk suvO.in two LA ray.Shr ua welitan managed Competition is one substitute wmaerolArPooho7a .fill Mr/aemal,TipontoEnAronmmml.t„um;.a&dibrAFaaST1A,anmJmer for the discipline of awelffuncfioning market IIntinnananmlmwMmo;wn,nmw.eminam. nmamym�ml ENR Spatial Advertising Serum A-3 CHOOSING COMPETITIVENESS is replacing the older system of compensation ness.Under these circumstances.the agencies more than under other alternatives and based on tenure and staff management respon remain an important public monopoly, refo employment.financial management,and other sibilifies.Outdated work practices.such as sep cused on operating competitively and acting as issues can become highly contentious. arating operations from maintenance, are stewards of pure drinking water, healthy There's no question that water and waste eroding. Increasingly,uNities are automating ecosystems,and a strong economy. water management is big business—more their processes and turning no unsupervised Another option is managed competition, than$10 billion a year,and it's getting bigger. operations where appropriate. especially if change is slow to come without According to the U.S.Census Bureau,the real The challenge, however,goes beyond external pressures.With a wetWesigned,well, need nationwide is double current expendi. changes that utility managers can execute rum process,managed competition ran generate lures. By all accounts,we can and should internally. Managers are recognizing the many of the benefits of the fast option.Uldnute- expect strong private interest in this large and r importance of working more closely with ly,however,managed competition may not have growing sector.At the same time,we should their governing boards, labor unions,and as long-lasting an effect on public institutions, expect the public sector to meet, and even directors of other municipal services to maxi- an cost more than internal change.and may be exceed,the performance and efficiency of pro Mize efficiency. This may require revised rejected by private firms,who may prefer more vale operators.Working together with govern work rules,more flexible procurement meth- simple outsourcing processes. ing boards,labor,and the community at large. Gds.or new kinds of accounting.A large part Some governing boards seeking change water and wastewater utility managers are pre of our challenge,therefore,is to find strong prefer a third alternative: moving directly to pared to do exactly that. political leadership. outsourcing without allowing any further pub 71te Association oJMerropolitan Sewerage lala moic a fic alternative.In our view this is a mistake.ll Agenrier(AMSA)repecan6 more than 175 afthe What is the future of public water and fruits competition and reduces innovation,pos, nation i/argafpuh0clyaumed uwemater utdthes wastewater utikfies?We see several choices. s"bly leading to a less efficient outcome than Our members serve the majority ofde population First,we can rise to the challenge and find either managed competition or internal cam- in the U.S. with sewer systems, reclaiming more ways to be competitive: the war we do busi petitiveness. Consumers can end up paying than 17billion gallem dandeuntereueryday. A CALL TO THE PUBLIC SECTOR By Moym Paul Helmke,Fort Wayne,Indiana There is a popular perception today that might be templed to allow private companies at how government operate& anything government rums is bureaucratic to take over everything government does.But Allowing private companies,whose offers and inefficient. If we listen to that, we what we really need in do is lake a closer look seem so coslefficiem,to take over public sea vices is tempting—especially when the ser- vice is as complex as filtering water or treating sewage. But as we examine what we do,we v need to consider other ideas for optimal cost- n I, [ (A 6 I"_:- effectiveness. Privatizing municipal services is _ 't F ' l 11 y not panacea.The path to efficient services 11 r '�_f '�_ I x - I I.i l I p 1 ( t �_ can take a number of routes.B we choose one ,.,. W_._._...,....�.,_.�_.�...Y.va alternative without exploring other options,we I deprive ourselves of the opportunity to see the PF Dvirka& Bartilucci has the expertise whole landscape. - Over the years in Fort amy , we have to assist your municipalin�in handling contacted many services Thatt are traditionally all its water and wastewater utiliry public. Our electric utility,was privatized in needs. So cou can rest assured that 1975. Private contractors also handle residen ....,..,s. - tial garbage collection,curbside recycling,yard everything from system design and waste collection,water and sewer cut repairs operation to efficient utility management and data processing, among other services. will be handled with the utmost But private contractors are not our only answer professionalism and cost-efficiency. to cost savings. In 1992 we were presented with the _ Your community relics on you for option of privatizing our City water and sewer clean surface waters and a bountiful ufades.which at first blush seemed to show supply of drinking water.Shouldn't greal savings. Instead we chose to be more - competitive,and it worked. =s= you rely on Dvirka& Bartiluccif An unsolicited offer to privatize our City s= Cell(516)364-9890 to get specifics Utiffies'water and sewer services claimed it could save an average of$1 million a year for _- on what Dvirka& Bartilucci can do 10 years,and would give us S6 million of than to assist y municipality,in municipa in full savings up bent regulator compliance. Instead of just jumping in,l formed a Citi- zen Advisory Comminee to study the issue in a Dvirka logical manner with its own consultant. In dA and 330 Crossways Perk Drive Bartilueei W'aodbun.New lark 11797-2015 1994.the group recommended the currml City -- 516-3M.9890 exc:516-3669045 management be allowed two years to reach benchmarks for efficiency before considering CireN 12 on aeaMr aervtee Cara A-4 Spedol Advmisiog Section fNR LOC I years - - = - i proven r ' r without 1 f,. The unbeatable combination: microlunneling and concrete pipe with Ameron w, T-Lock lining That's 50 years R's an unbeatable,cost-effective combination:the and still counting! corrosive resistance of T-Lock and the strength and No other sewer protection durability of concrete pipe. system can match that record.Not plastic pipe. Around the world,over 125 million square feet of Not coatings or mastics.Not chemical treatment T-Lock lined sewer pipe are in the ground.Install T-Lock T-Lock is an extra-tough, specially formulated polyvinyl and forget it! For more information about proven chloride sheeting that locks mechanically into the T-Lock protection,contact Anterior Protective LLnings interior wall of concrete sewer pipe during manufacture, Products:201 North Berry Street,Brea,California 92821; providing a flexible corrosion barrier that will withstand Phone:(714)256-7755:In:(714)256-7750. decades of severe service. A Anteron Protective Linings ,�,R Circle 13 on Reader service card • 4J� I used to call Insituform a< only when it was too disruptive to dig up a sewer. 3 h3, 1 , Not anymore." s� O r Today, Insituform is my FIRST CHOICE on almost every sewer rehabilitation project. What has changed? Insituform's technologies.Through ongoing research and development and years of experience, Insituform has improved the performance and versatility of its products.That's why Insituform can solve a wider range of sewer problems today than ever before. • Insituform's solutions are also now a better VALUE, which means I can rehabilitate more pipe for my dollar today than ever before. • But not everything about Insituform has changed. Insituform continues to provide the most reliable solutions on the market. I still work with EXPERIENCED pipe rehabilitation professionals who are backed by a worldwide network of engineering resources.• I also work with a company that takes complete RESPONSIBILITY for my solution and has ISO 9000 systems M. I to ensure the quality of its work, start to finish.The result is a solution I can trust. That's why I now use Insituform more than ever. . For more information,call 800.234-2992 or 314-532{ Insituform737. fP.C�2RO�rIGSr JflG LOq�glil 193i IirylNpm IFhM;eS,IiY. Circle 14 an Reader Service Card contract management for the Water Roston requires a strong commitment from the top of& are now in the process of contracting out the Plant Today,not only has the plant changed dal down to the workers.Our City Utilities staff service.We plan to hire a contract compliance its philosophy to meet those benchmarks— was ready to take on that challenge in 1994. superintendent and we still will be responsible cutting noels and increasing service—but it We responded to the comparison for assuming some costs.The company will has handled other major challenges that arose between the City and private companies that offer the right of fast refusal to current work- during the past twee years provide the best services with a plan to close ers and the salary and benefits will be comp& Why would a city undertake the arduous the gap.We accomplished this in part with table.Still.we win save about S110,00o a year task of reorganizing its management when a automation,work force reduction through attrr and receive greater service.This is an opportt private company could do it for them? don, and working with the employee union nity that was difficult to tun down. One answer is that 9 the city's dedication toward things such as incentive programs for The negotiations were important to us, is strong and it an run its services better than productivity.We instated fine bubble aeration because we wanted to maintain accountability. average industry standards,it an save more at the sewer treatment facility for savings on In addition to the compliance superintendent, money than a private company. City govern, electricity. Plus,because we were in charge, the contract win all for penalty fees if the cote ment dens not pay taxes and does not need w we had the flexibdity to work on environmental no are not met accurately and will allow for make a profit,thereby giving it a potential for a issues involving combined sewer overflows release from the contract if the company fats savings 20 percent grater than if a private and watershed management as they came to ce perform Itthe company costs are below the company took over management That extra the forefront contract figures,the City will receive 60 per savings can be reinvested into the public Sometimes, however, City government cent of that savings. Both our City Garage and works to continue bettering the service. doesn't have the ability to overhaul a depart. City Utilities arrangements center around this Another reason is that because we as ment that doesn't mat the industry standards. theme: Government needs to be ampefitive elected officials are directly responsible to the For instance,our City Garage costs for vehicle with the private sec m-while remaining respon, public,we are more accountable and more maintenance are average for the private sector, sive and accountable to the public.It is that involved with the public Public participation is but the service we provide is far lower.Oppor- compeddon in a free market that permits the important because sometimes residents would t u ides to change the facility productivity over citizens to receive the best services for the rather pry more than have an important aspect the years have not proved effective. money they pay.But it is of the unrest impor. of thew service at This is especially true,for Therefore,I created a City Garage Task tance that we carefully evaluate all options instance,when it comes to drinking water. Force in 1996 to evaluate the options.The dry before jumping on the bandwagon of privaei a There is more to efficiency than saving money. paid a consultant S4,000 to help the garage tion.R government an provide service efle . We also must offer all the services the public workers submit thew own bid.Also,the work- Lively, and public input is important, desires at a level that satisfies them ers could have used union assistance to submit government should continue to provide the Of nurse,to get results,a municipality a bid.After evaluating several proposals,we servicesowatizens demand. FLORIDA UTILITY SHARES GAINS WITH EMPLOYEES By Nan B.Ispass,P.E.,DEE,Director, And Mary C.Gouvelra-Iacconi,Manager,Public Education&Training Orange Call*Utilities,Odando,Florida wilding new facilities was the primary As a first step,the concept of total quality Deputy Director of the Utility was the first to goal of Orange County Utilities in management coined the"Quality Initiative", be eliminated. Subsequently,75 additional Orlando, Florida during the 1980s, was borrowed from the corporate world and positions in the water and wastewater system when the primary challenges were to introduced in 1993.Top management spent 40 were slated for elimination and seven depart. ape with regulatory enforcement and to pro- hours learning the importance of their cent- ments were consolidated into five. vide capacity for a rapidly growing region, mitment to quality, the significance of a& The reductions were made gradually, These goals were achieved by 1994 and the tomer fans and fect-based decision making. however. Management implemented the utifity's water and wastewater system received The training also was given to middle mum, ALERT (Advanced listing&Employee Re an"Aa"rating from Moady's Investors Service. alters and then to the more than 750 non, Training) Program to reduce the number of Then came the 1990's—a decade of drastic supervisory employees layoffs by helping employees find other posia change in customer expectations,workplace Next an automated supervisory antral dons. Employees were given six months' culture, political agendas, business practices and data acquisition (SCADA) system was nonce,and AIERF offered training oppomud and dtzensviews of government services installed in 1995, allowing remote monitoring des and career counseling.A hotline was esab Even more dramatic has been the change and control of the water system Faculties row lished and bulletins were published that in competitive pressure.Orange County Ut7F are visited only once a day for an operational described the AIERF Program,listed posf- ties was always subject to competition from check and as needed for maintenance.A si n m tions planned for elimination and those aval publicly-owned and investor-awned utilities lar SCADA system is planned for the waste able elsewhere,other training courses.and nearby,but the 1990s brought a new type of watersyslem counseling sessions.This open atmosphere cmrryebw—the operation contractor.High, Personnel expenses had accounted for deterred rumors and encouraged supportive ly capitalized,well managed and politically nearly 50 percent of the utility's operating mtaerflonamongemployees savvy with strong marketing departments, costs.With automation,cross-training and a Employees on AIEU status could take these companies waned elected othcials with new way of doing business,it became apparent courses at the uhlhy's expense as long as train, promises of lower operating con and conce& that reductions in the number of employees ing was related to a ublitiesdype position,the sion fees Realizing that flange and increased needed to be made.After careful evaluation,a cost did not exceed M,and the n ininng was competition were inevitable,Orange County new organizational structure emerged. Man- completed before the individual's layoff date. Utilities embarked on a journey not only to alters and supervisors would no longer have They were offered career counseling seminars continue to build more fadifies as needed,but assistants,and employees would have no more that included skits assessment resume writ. to build upon its organizational strengths— than three supervisors between themselves ing.dressing for success and how to search far especialy its employees, and the department manager. The position of a job.Sessions on"Dealing With Change" FNR Spedol pdverkhg Section A-7 were presented by the County's Employee approaches.After evaluating employees input $300,000 was retained to be used for rate smbi AssisWac Program(EAP)provider an incentive program was drafted to encourage Nation;S300,000 was retained for fugue utility Of the 76 targeted positions,38 were cow utility-wide improvement and m share cost saw incentives;and each employer received S1,000. ered under the bargaining unit contract with trigs with employees as �R6 the laborers International Union of North The bargaining unit agreement, well as I�iMR America.Early communication with union off County policy,had for many years limited c ?,,rem wvs s..imR'i cials was essential.They came to understand employee raises to annual cost of living adjust- the increasing competition for government w- menu Although all employees were given an 1 vices,and agreed it was fair to eliminate an annual written performance evaluation,their equal number of bargaining unit and nonbar- compensation had not been linked to perfor gaining unit positions mane.Thus,instituting an Employee Incen, j Results of the ALERT Program were five Program required considerable discussion "°°®• ��� seen within the first month Employees signed with union leaders and the County administra, up for training in new technical skills and sub. Con.As the impact of competition from the pri jects such as business etiquette.They began vate sector became more apparent the concept Elivawr,Ae Iavd finding other job opportunities.Several found of"gainsharing•was combined with the ®nwar',raw.Sl till rev A„mn new careers at increased salaries—positions ALERT Program and received support from ®r m•cowry w..x.m they would not have otherwise pursued.When the unions leaders. Gainshar(ng- or distribut. awlam.si'm cad October 1, 1996 arrived,only one employee of ing a portion of the financial savings realized the waterand wastewater system was laid otL from improved efficiency—was expanded to With the emergence of private.sector Akey ingredient of the Quality Initiative is include a distribution of savings to the Coun. competition for publicly-owned water and the involvement of employees in identifying tys general fund. These concepts were pre- wastewater utilities,public sector decision areas for improvement One of the issues idea rented to the Board of County Commissioners, makers must be willing to re-engineer their filed was"pay for perfanmance."Employees N and approved. organiafians to assure the highest quality set- the downsized workforce slowly accepted the Gamsharng may be used to reward work. vice at the lowest possible CosL Using tools need for increased quality, but in return they era for reductions in both operating ratio and such as teamwork,human resource reforms, wanted more than mere recognition if they unit costs in one year compared with the prey organizational restructuring,automation and succeeded in achieving efficiencies and ous year.In 1996, the utility reduced both, performancebased incentives. By working exceeding customers'expectmore. resulting in a savings of$2,400,000. That with as employees to apply these tools orange Perfomrance-based initiatives are typically money was then distributed according to the County UCkdes has adapted to the changes of shunned by public employers. Nevertheless, gainsharing agreement$1,32II was con- the 1990s and is positioning itself for the dms the new way of doing business demanded new I tributed to the County's General Fund; matic changes soil to come. MANAGING YOUR UTILITY AS A BUSIN1-57 ESS ORANGE COUNTY A M„ n, to Municipal Water Supply and Wastewater Management FINDS EMPLOYEE HazEN AND SAWYER isan employee- � Competitive Analysis TEAMS ARE KEY owned environmental consulting firm • Nate Evaluation with offices throughout the eastern • Continuous Internal Improvement TO CHANGE United States and worldwide. We • privatization Feasibility offer extensive experience in the Organization/Staffing technical aspects of management Benchmarking By Pritack McNally, consulting. Education and Training Spedolin and t r. t •!'., c `'`tie/r�I E I Doug Cook,Chief Plant Operator, F :�� a_E. iy I)i 1?l4I F N ]30 Broadway • New York,Nv 10003 (nun Sanitation Dimids of Orange Court .,•:;' • : ,. .: _e. .:. (212)M-e40o • Fax:(212)614-9049 N 9 N,CA mrvse rs on Reeser a•raaw wit re is perhaps no single greater chal- j lenge for a public agency in today+s ect, nomic and political climate than in give WE BUILDBETTER INSURANCE taxpayers"the best bang for their burk" Therefore,against the backdrop of bankruptcy SOLUTIONS. in Orange County,Califomme in early 1995,the -I'vagron Drug.and Marketing -En,irmun,nul Risk Manage....... administrators of the County Sanitation Dis bids of Orange County,an award-winning publiclyowned treatment works (PO'IW),felt obligated to investigate whetherwe could corn Pete with the private sector and how we need Division;I The prolenion2l,at Aon Constructioii Se,-vices would be,proud to shmvI ed to change ourselves to prepare for the 21st you how our expertise and e,ceptic—I cornminnent to client service cigi betiefit century.Although we had not increased user fees for several years,our staff was concerned about costs and knew that we could further A �� improve ow bottom line to both increase e& MN Aon Risk Services ciency and reduce our budget. We embarked -- - era.as an besot gestate wit on a carefully structured process of analysis, A-E special Adrerli*g Sedion ENR FEW THINGS IN LIFE ARE As DEPENDABLE AS DUCTILE IRON PIPE . M y i There's only one pipe that always remains loyal temperatures and, quite honestly, just doesn't seem to the task. So when you want the toughest, most to hold up under pressure. And over time, Ductile reliable pipe available, count on Ductile Iron. It Iron Pipe proves to be the best value because it withstands temperature.changes, direct tapping and lasts longer. In fact, we've identified nearly 500 expansive soil like no other. PVC, on the other hand, utilities that have enjoyed 100 years of service from is a weaker material. It loses impact strength at iron pipe. Call DIPRA today, and find out about lower temperatures, loses tensile strength at higher the one pipe that's there when you need it most. DUCTILE IRDH PIPE THE RIGHT DECISION XIICnI£moXeiRnEStroughaluGun[afoZIS AismearchArvisaR5viu0.hoeCNm Al35Nt N15n9e cast Ahihn.Gi0aa.91 Ma OM Vat,5 s A"nest p, s ar;amee ftuxt a o,NA of Can 1 continuing esenoR A scan Cast Iron C Roe CompanY'.10anrc Slaves Lam Iron Roe Comps a turya Rp.lampafY t. po V. 5} Ce co�n.n G A,m 5pe Rppu[Y Co.,NeN'ane Can Inln Roe Cp JWry RauLc$3A GA ligl flpe ComWnyNxlep$m:es Rp¢aM iowary Cdnpanl. �Manuhtlu M Irom lev::alaAf a a.t. , Project Management System"' "The Right Solution for Today's Owner", "If PARAGON can handle our construction _ — p[ogram,itcan handle just about anything.." uiJ . --iJ sra,�.ra�=ai�ey.JJ Luis Zurinaga,P.E., e - Coordinating Project Manager, u, San Francisco Intl Airport Expansion Program J J s - "We adopted PARAGON because it is the only tool designed specifically for the Owner. Using "— PARAGON,my staff have reduced time spent on r project paperwork by 400/u or more...now they spend more time in the field addressing tough — project issues.." � — JamesAbron,P.E., — Manager,Construction&Field Services Div. _ City of Oakland,Public Works Agency r— •Manage Project Costs and Documents using new PARAGON Binders' •Designed for the Owner's Project Management Team: RE's,Inspectors,Cost Engineers&Project Managers •Over 150 Standard Reports&Logs •Link to MS Wordr"r,MS Project &P-3' ' •Customize Reports and PARAGON Binderfields to fit your methodology Call Today for FREE - Demo CD! " 1 -800-COMBASE 510-238-0715 !� Or,visit us on the Web for more info: " www.combaseinc.com Planning and change and soma discovered that ment of a new business plan. Because we felt place over the next two years.will include a a key to our ultimate success was the forma that our existing 0&M work practices were roaster implementation schedule,an assimila- tion of teams ofemployees working together to vulnerable to privatization,we chose eight don program that will make sure that the pace reshape our operations and maintenance employees representing all levels of O&M staff of change does not exceed the capacity of nor (000 work activities tovisit a few of the most mttesshd wasewater workforce to adapt and testing in verify that an To begin this process,we contracted with treatment agencies in the country and ford new work practices,procedures or tectoolp a private consulting firm to audit existing ways to improve.The enthusiasm of these gin meet the goals of the project. agency operations and maintenance costs,and employees on their return spearheaded the for- Once the new business plan has been compare them to private,contract-operated mation of what we now call the"District implemented and had time to work.Phase facilities. The results showed that the savings Assessment and Reinvention Team"(DART), Five,called the re-audit phase,will begin. It from improved business practices would make comprising union and non-union staff who will take a look back at where we have been our operations and maintenance costscompeh� report due*to the general manager.DART and compare our results with are recormnro- five with private O&M suppliers.By crompar- empowers workers in'think out of the box"in dations of our original audit.It will analyze the like these"best business practices"to our own this,perhaps the most critical project of its outcome of oar various efforts in Phase Four, and adjusting for operational factors such as kind in the history of our agency. DAM and compare them with the goals and bench- regulatory compliance and the condition of oar main tasks are in assess,modify,incorporate, marks of the business plan.We also win mom- Infrastructure,we found that we could subsmo- and ultimately implement new techniques and for the ability of our"changed"processes to tiaay reduce our O&M budget technologies to improve productivity. continueto meet the competitive challenges of This audit was followed by a second coo The areas inimally targeted for riinenton the future tract to help us create a business plan to fig the are treatment process improvement,the main We have continued to make progress "competitive gap."We decided that if dus effort tenance management system,administrative toward the capture of the economies we seek was going in succeed,it would have to be an practices affecting O&M,job miles and respon- Employee attrition,firmer control of chemical employeedriven process to achieve the'buy siL'dities,and compensation strategy.The fund usage,sofidshandd'mg mat control,and new in"required for this type of change.The step in completing Phase Two was to develop a automation systems have already reduced process would also need the enthusiastic sup business plan that inmrponated all of DAM costs substantially,and we feed strongly that port of those it would affect most.Therefore, initial recommendations. the program of measures outlined by our new we established a five-phase"reinvention Phase Three involves some of the most business plan will capture the nest. process"that would be implemented over a critical efforts to date-It focuses on documem We chose to use an inclusive process that two4ofouryearperiod. ing existing processes, redesigning the reaches into all levels of the organization using The first phase consisted of auditing our processes,and development of the implemen- aossfunctional teams of workers who are try- current work practices and technology or take tation plan.The effort centers around several ing to wive our problems and orate a better a snapshot of where we were at the beginning teams that were formed to focus on specific future.Ultimately,as we continue to move this of the process,set priorities for the necessary areas identified in Phase Two. Phase Three process along,we wig be left with an organizes improvements,and compare our existing prac- also calls for training in team building and pro don made up of employees who are allowed to den to'best practices"in our industry. viding the teams with the mots necessary for make their own decisions about their work, Once this information was gathered,it effective process improvements and with a strong voice in determining the was time m move inn Phase Two.the develop Phase Four.which is scheduled to cake direction of our agency. PASSAIC VALLEY TRIES ENTREPRENEURIAL APPROACH TO PUBLIC SERVICE By Robert J.Davenport,EzeMive Director,and Sheldon lipke,Superintendent of Plant Operations, Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners,Nava,New Jersey e Passak Vagey Sewerage Commission remake themselves into efficient organizations energy consumed 20%of PVSC's operations era (PVSC) operate a 330milhon gallon that provide service equal to or better than a and maintenance dollars. Electrical energy per day wastewater treatment plant which Private-sector operation The ultimatum is was used for prows operations and lighting. services 1.3 mflfion people.350 major dear—improve or be privatized.In 1995, Natural gas was used to generate high-pres industrial users,and over 5A00 commercial PVSC embarked upon an ambitious program on steam for sludge treatment and low-pres customers. located in the heavily industrial- to meet this demand. sure steam and hot water for space heating and iced area of northern New Jersey,the district The goal of the PVSC is to provide waste cooling. Savings in this area have a major covers all or parts of47 municipalities including water services to ratepayers at the lowest pos impact on the bottom dine the cides of Newark Jersey City,and Paterson. sible cost and it is following dual paths m this An opportunity to reduce the mat of space 7bmigh its%year history,the mganfza goal.One path is to aggressively reduce costs heating and cooling arose when a cogeneration tion operated as a well-run government through reductions in energy,debt service, facility was proposed in the virinftyofthe place agemy,supplying an essential service at a tea and personnel costs.The other path is to A steam distribution system was installed to suitable price. B operating casts increased or -grow"the business and increase revenues by replace boners in the three holdings nearest in new mandates were imposed by the state or adding new services,collecting fees for wr- the mgeneration plant The savings of 60% federal governments they were passed along vices formerly provided at no cest.and apply- overgasheatng are w significant that PVSC is to the ratepayers who paid mainly without ing innovative financial techniques to now studying an extension of the steam sys protest In the last three years,however,the maximize investment income. like private-see tern to the remaining building& advent of dangesrale privatization has drartuR for entrepreneurs, PVSC seeks to exploit Although cogeneration steam has early changed the way government services oPWrhmitiesthat mine its way. replaced mine natural gas usage,over$3 mil} are provided. Government agencies must Before the program began,the cost of lion per year was spent on gas for process ENR Spend Advem afar Was A"11 ,r waste permitting program. dent sludge treatment and a lowcast sludg ..-3 Fees on new connections have management program set the stage for a g also been imposed. Such spa expansion of PVSC's customer base beyond it , vial user fees are expected to own sewer service area—and the creation of add $500,000 annually to new business. PVSC's revenues. The new trucked-in liquid waste busines However, the greatest started with the acceptance of sepmge an, opportunity to "grow" rev. municipal sludge from neighboring wastente enues came from the least like treatment plants. like all new entrepreneur ly source. PVSC built the FVSC learned about contracts, credit checks R world's largest Zimpro we air advertising,and customer satisfaction. Th, It oxidation sludge treatment Commission now advertises at trade shows ° system in the early 1980's. gives away mugs and pens,and serves hot col The Zimpro process subjects fee to the sock drivers.The Zimpro systen sludge to high pressure and and the size of the PVSC facility allow fin a high temperatures which acceptance of wastes that other facilities woult remove the water and change find hard to handle. The list of material PVSC cryogenic oxygen production and ararage lan7iry, its structure into a very dry accepted for treatment has grown to includt soil-like cake. This type of food processing wastes,commercial wastes steam generation. The purchase of deregulat. sludge treatment system is usually expensive to water treatment plant sludges,and non-has ed gas, started two years ago. has reduced operate and maintain,creates strong odors,and ardous industrial wastes. these costs by W.000 per year. suffers from chronic boiler plant failures. Very Service to customers is PVSC's highev Electricity costs PVSC$12 million per few of the dozens of Zimpro installations built priority. Unlike the typical municipal opera year. The utility offers payments to customers are still in operation. Over its first decade of lion,sludge is accepted 24 hours a day,sever that implement process improvements to service,the mechanical problems were gradual days a week,and PVSC strives to approve of improve energy efficiency. These Demand ly solved by the addition of a regenerative after new waste streams within 24 hours. Revenut Side Management(DSM)payments.based on burner for effective odor control and the has grown to over S3 million in less than ant the amount of energy actually saved,are in installation of an 88 million high-pressure boiler year. Wastes are trucked in not only from al addition to savings from the reduced use of plant. The key to the cost effectiveness of the over New Jersey but from New York and Penn electricity. A much needed $23 million process is how much sludge cake remains for sylvania m well. replacement of obsolete aeration equipment disposal. The Zimpro process produces only Public service organizations are now by energycfficient units wBl be paid for entire 25%as much sludge cake as other treatment exposed to the same competitive pressures as ly with DSM and energy savings. Efforts are processes,an the cost of handling the sludge the private sector. Government tan respond continuing to fund other plant improvements cakes is far less than other sludge processing by abandoning its traditional role of providing the same way. systems. water and wastewater services or it can meet On the second path to improvement,fees The last element of the efficiency pro- the challenge of becoming as efficient and are being used to recover the costs of pro. gram,therefore,fell into place when a new creative as a good private company. The Pas grams which benefit only certain FVSC cut effort for the beneficial use of sludge took saic Valley Sewerage Commissioners have tomers. Industrial waste permit fees, for effect in 1996, resulting in a 50%reduction in met this challenge by taking an entrepreneur example,were introduced recently to help cake disposal costs compared to the previous ial approach to the business of wastewater defray the cost of administering the industrial practice of Iand611ktg.The combination of effi- treatment. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE: AUTOMATION GENERATES LONG-RUN RETURNS By Robert Hite,Dishict Manager,Mefto Wastewater Reclamakon District, Denver,Colorado n an effort in give ratepayers the best value wastewater treabnent and biosokds processing. logic controllers (PLCs) and a supervisory for their dollar, the Metro Wastewater Various sections of the plant now rely computer (PI-VAX).In all.the MOD 300 ran Reclamation District (Metro District) of upon automation. including the laboratory, trol systems network incorporates 26 nodes. Denver.Colorado,initiated automation of engineering,finance,purchasing,warehouse, Plant operators and electriW instrument its operations and maintenance activities more industrial waste/pretreatment,and interceptor technicians (Errs) interact directly with the than 20 years ago.Since then,the district has monitoring.These systems are being rapidly CSG,allowing them to tackle control system learned at first hand what automation can do to integrated so that employees can exchange problems,resolve process conditions,monitor foster competitive forces in a modem waste- information and work together to reengineer process alarms and explain process proce' water treatment facility.This year,the long the way the district works.A number of furry dures.The interaction between plant opera term benefits of automation allowed the district lions use customized software or integrated tars,Errs and the CSG has made possible a to reduce rates by 5.5 percent,effective in software packages to aid in automation.These high level of technical process control 199$What's more,this rate level is expected were rolled out gradually,section by section. improvements, to remain in effect for the next 10 years. The control system group (CSG) is The plant is operated from the main con- The Metro District's highly automated, responsible for managing system hardware trol room with a video monitor displaying a 185 MGD central treatment plant uses an inno- and software implementation,monitoring alga proprietary program that incorporates icons vative distributed system to control, not just rithms,and training of plant operators.It uses and graphics unique to the Denver plant.The monitor and alarm,the process.Automation an Asea Brown Boveri (ABB) MOD 300& operator controls plant equipment by manipu- has increased the consistency and reliability of tribuled control system (DCS),programmable lasing these symbols on the monitor. A-12 Spatial Advertising Sedian FNR John Cartwright, Senior Project Engineer for the Gorman-Rupp Prime-Aire, never settles for second best. With over 17 years of engineering experience in pump design, John _ ---+, Cartwright wasn't about to develop anything but the best when Gorman-Rupp asked him to expand their line of centrifugal - - - � trash pumps with a priming assisted model. Gorman-Rupp has long been acknowledged as the world leader in construction trash pumps and John 6 ; - insisted that the Prime-Aire"' models meet the highest , = quality standards. That's why when Construction Equipment magazine informed Gorman-Rupp that the - Prime-Aire- trash pump -is nne of the top 100 new products of 1996, John just smiled. - a - When you need help moving liquids, come to the ". experts. We've got over 60 years of experience and a dedicated staff of professionals just like John Cartwright. meG..,RP,Com,,-PG.Baz 1217-W.fild.M.449G1-1217.413M5 1011-F 41975SMl ,s - 44jj,,''��$1 � 1 GORMAMPP PUMPS t � Y IP 1 � L*� •---M s 4 CiW 1B an BBtiv SNYIn CN �!>a B(ggnplY.M fa^v„HW�'•19T �.a � _ ,� tlFE ARE TH \NOSp,•� ILE f A OvOERE IRON. 04 .a atuod'` • i cp5t\v on<ti\ rEas e e\ repot re pnito rin9e be<aU sY srem, 50 ,,be tenan to t¢ main to h be Y Ce a o,es tier v d near\y ¢mill¢ f 5ertc v Pipe rotecU on. <i. We've t0O years o fin on d o\ is onmatcNudcaooe as\n t beat ota tit iasteeso that NyvC a,\��p o A o°na to y°r n d ,N ttN F\exibtfa�of an ftw,orasY y°o 1ao ste i' ahan steel Sr\om iron P`Q e. on cans it n, i n do 1os In othe to instal ktit N t iio,^ s Baste oa in9 al safer �o<u\e Iv on <n desi9 n addKion� .rve coat rot oW eevattvesorges \ ensive <orro5 �O Oncti\Cons u a ' more ra ssvre. `nexP dprin4 P .,P%e and- ��R�G'H� D verotnttvt p iGmaNgP,Maui. offers a s "�„ SX - N,95zan. smca�e aM �narre,r°k �. rasn tM,tl� "Pp tNS till % tSV`oCW.15� KV P4atM^9a`h" 9 119m pp9'at M, A good example of a process loop that is automated wet chemistry analyzer.That was District employees have identified entirely automated is the control of dissolved followed 10 years later with the acquisition of a strategic locations in the sewer interceptor oxygen (DO) in the nitrification process. For computerized laboratory information manage system to measure flow during the dry and reaLSme control, DO probes measure the coo- mem system(UMS). wet weather season. In areas where the wet centration of dissolved oxygen continuously in The LIMS offers automatic,electronic weather flows approach 80 percent of capaci the aeration basins.Operations employees enter transfer of validated data to the Metro District ty, flow rates are monitored more closely to a DO segtolnt into the process control system to database daily,with direct access for other determine if a line is reaching capacity. At satisfy process requirements. B the DO begins departments. The current minicomputer mine strategic sites in the system,flow onea- to drop,air valves automatically open to supply based system soon will be replaced with a surement is continuous.so all kinds of events more air.As the pressure drops in the air head- cbentserver system teaming a relational dale are captured.The data is collected and stored er,the controls maintain pressure by opening base to allow enhanced integration with the in data loggers at the site. It is then penodi the guide vanes to the blower.This control strat. districts database and associated hardware. tally transmitted to the central treatment egy consistently removes carbonaceous bio- ❑MS also includes industrial waste more plant using a radio modem. During a storm. chemical oxygen demand (CBOD) and agement functions that allow monitoring data to this flow data can help figure out the impact amunonm in meet government permit lim m be transferred directly to the industrial waste of excess precipitation seeping into the inter- A second example can be seen in the dis dambase.This program provides a detailed, ceplor system. bid's reworking of the control logic for the suf computerized tracking system to trace dam as Response to the automation of the Metro fur dioxide feed system to provide fail-safe well M report deadlines,violadonz enforcement District has been largely positive, thanks in operation.Should the feeder equipment fart or and compliance schedules.The Metro District part to a unique partnership with the Interim. reach capacity,the controller automatically monitors a wide range of industrial users with donal Union of Operating Engineers and an - stzrta mother feeder.If the second feeder does varying levels of compliance standards. innovative program designed to`grow"talent not perform,it is automatically removed from The district maintains a comprehensive from within rather than hiring people from out service and a flJrd feeder is placed in service. industrial waste survey @VS) that identifies side the plan. This control logic insures compliance with the industrial users and characterizes the waste The benefits of automating operations and districts permit requirement to remove all chi& water discharges in its Oracle relational data- maintenance are very clear.The Mean District rine from the ePouem before it is discharged base.The DVS database is multifunctional. It has seen a substantial reduction in operating into the South Plane River.An alarm alerts the allows the district to reliably check its identified costs at the plant particularly since growth in operator in the central control room.allowing industries against any industry listing found the number of staff members has been cur. Kim to address the problem immediately. through other sources and inform them of new tailed without jeopardizing compliance with This reliable control system has allowed categorical standards as needed.The survey permits. At the same time,customers are the Metro District to increase plant capacity information also an be used to track sources of being rewarded with relatively pow, stable, and vestment level without increasing open harmful discharges to the sewer system. long-term rates. torsmffing. MAINTMIAMCE SYSTEM MINIMIZES DOWNTIME Adhering to a planned maintenance phi- 1 . Advocates losophy has produced strong results by keep ing reactive maintenance to a minimum.the district typically has 95 percent of its equipment available for operations.An important tool in Helping Communities Adapt to A planning work orders is the extensive use of an automated maintenance control system(MCS). Changing Business Environment The MCS is used by maintenance supervi • Human Performance Services tars to identify and set priorities,plan,sched • Privatization Alternative Analysis ule and assign work. It tracks labor,parts and outside services for the work order and the • System Optimization piece of equipment-It also provides a history • Economic& Overhead Analyses and cost of the repair.An innovative element of • Managed Competition the Metro Districts MCS is the integration of • Public Employee Bids the maintenance,purchasing,and warehouse • Energy Management& Rate Negotiation functions within the mtware.This has result ed in a highly efficient maintenance organva • Privatized Financing ton that does not have to stand idly by waiting • Public Contract Operations for pans and supplies. Supplementing this preventive mainte- A Successful Track Record Built Upon nance program is a predictive maintenance Creative Stmfegites, Private Sector Techniques, program. which can forecast a failure on a and Knowledge of Municipal Economics piece of equipment by collecting dam and con and Process Technology. paring it against a historical norm.If managed correctly,it reduces maintenance costs by rec- nor vrlormadan mnraa: ommending repair and replacement of equip John Williams, National Director ment that is about to fail,and by minimizing Municipal Advocacy& Economics preventive maintenance when there is no HDR Engineering, Inc. known problem. 1-800-7294439 LANONATORT AIROMATES MELT Automation of laboratory analyses began Commined to Serving the Interests of Communtities in 1972 with acquisition of a segmented flow ENR Spiral Adverliritg Win A-15 Ctret.19 an ft G Srrvlw Care A SMALL TOWN EMBRACES BIG CHANGES By John A. Bum,Kennedy/Jenks Consultants And Thomas!.Fossum,Director of Public Works/C y Engineer,City of Auburn,California S mall lawns often face wastewater treat- Population and wastewater four ' ment problems similar to those of larger have increased.discharge am- arras, _ areas,but with fewer human and ruuncial dards have become increasingly -i - resources to handle them: for example, stringent, and public expecta- typically they lack access to low-interest bor- lions for plant performance,par. - rowing and have fewer ratepayers and sma ter titularly in the area of odor and ! 'Y Y.,1 municipal staffs. Despite such impediments, noise emissions,have risen.Sew - „ however,Auburn, a small community near eral fish kills in Auburn Ravine Sacramento.California, is meeting the ch6 Creek,which some have atrib lenge of competition, largely by having the uted to the operation of the plant. flexibility and political courage to embrace net have heightened public concern. e. essary innovatiom as has the recent failure of sever. During the 1970s and has.federal hmding al sections of the city's aging x allowed even small communities to build sec- sewer system. ondary wastewater treatment plants.Unforns In October 1993, the nately,many small towns did not(or could not) Auburn City Council saw that _ match this capital investment with ongoing dramatic steps were needed to revenue to maintain thew wastewater facilities turn the situation around.Follow. and save for future replacement. Fewer ing an open selection process. _ ratepayers means large,onetime capital invesF the cin'hired Operations Man- _ menu,like wastewater plants,are harder for agement International (Denver. _ small cities to maintain over time.Often,these Colorado) to operate the waste towns face more constraints on the raising of water collection and treatment _ fees than larger cities.where sanitation ager- system. .:` ties often have more latitude in passing In October 1994.the Cen- - fuough increases to users. hat Valley Regional Water Qua& What's more,in the compefition for lmob ty Control Board (the state ed public funds,more visible smalkown issues regulatory agency responsible Stmue of Claude Chan,located in Old Town motion al Auburn. such as streets and schools sometimes edge for implementing the National out wastewater systems.The result in many Pollutant Discharge Elimination Chana first disrovered gold in 1848 in the mining ramp that cases is a failing wastewater nfiaswctore and System permit program) become Auburn. It would only be a slight exaggeration to say r increasing environmental problems.with dwin imposed new discharge require that the city's sewers are almost as old as the prospector who e fng cash reserves to deal with the situation. menu on the city.Among these founded the town. Municipal employees are expected to do requirements was a January 1, more with less,vet in manv small commuri- 1998 deadline for meeting stringent effluent small communities. In addition,large cities ties,an overburdened city public works d"vec- criteria Like many small communities.Auburn benefit from an'ecoromy of sale"relative to for is the one who must pursue federal and is expected to cope with escalating regulatory the fixed casts that arise when issuing bonds. state funding to maintain or upgrade inframen. demands without specialists who can dedicate Because larger cities generally have larger pro- lure, without specialized knowledge of the time to understanding them,and without sties, jecu and thus issue larger bond amounts,they industry. As such,this finance director is cam lists who an monitor their impact are able to distribute the bond issuance costs I peting for funds against cities employing small Nonetheless.the city responded to these over a larger amount of money. battalions of specialism whose job it is to kwork new requirements by developing a plan for The city then looked into pursuing a Iran the system."identifying grant and loan money installing new biological treatment facilities from the California State Revolving Fund(SRF) sources in and out ofgovemment and tertiary filters at an estimated cost of$11.5 program. Under SRF, the federal governrnmt In short,small town wastewater athori- million. In order to meet the deadlinm mini- typically supplies approximately 84 percent of des are finding that public expectations have mize costs, and encourage innovative solu- the total cast and these funds are matched by grown while older,tarn-of-thecentury irfra- lions,the city has decided to use a combination the state,which provides the remaining 16 per- structure is reaching the end of its life. That of design-bid build and desigrebuild approach, cent Mary larger cities don't even consider was the situation in Auburn,a community of es to construct the facilities.The design-bid- SRF funding because they don't want to deal approximately 12,000. nestled in the Sierra build documents are complete and ready for with the additional bureaucracy bongs Nevada foothills about 30 miles east of down- bidding. Preparation of the design-build pack- The California SRF program offers an town Sacramento.The city's wastewater sys. age began in the summer of 1997. option in which the state win offer amo merest tern was first developed using brick-sewer The next important order of business was rare if the borrower can come up with matching construction at the nun of the century.In 1963. financing.City officials first explored the tiros, funds on its own.Ms is the loan option being the city constructed a wastewater pond test- cial markets.but found that the costs of bond pursued by Auburn.However.the city's desire ment plant along Auburn Ravine Creek,out- financing would force them to increase rates to use a design-build approach has added yet side the city fimits which was upgraded to an for existing customers nearly eight-fold.Due to another wrinkle m project funding and delivery. oxidation ditch secondary treatment system in their larger,more stable economies,larger It is among the first designbudd projects,to be 1977 with federal Clean Water Grant funding. noes usually have a bemerchance of qualifying considered for SRF funding in California Using Since then,the demands on Auburn's for higher bond ratings and thus can command desigo-huild pramement complicates SRF loan wastewater treatment system have intensified. better interest ones on the bond markets than procedures because it requires administrative A-16 Spedol Adverlidng Saxton ENR With d«indling public funds and increased press r m op ' mina A. utilities options ... utility com Staffed wi _ citation, _ t and m services,. (CDM)breaddC h help elieq u operations-related allowing our clients m the best course of auiou ' their speck needs. �. CDM provides fullrservice '- environmental ring and management _ government and' - u worldwide ...fromFrr planning and design,tN..Sh, construction and o�a�"'" ,;'.''.'rI..'.for the life of you wr!^` P r7,�q„rrar CDMser & McKee Managing the Life of Your Project consulting Corporate Headquarters engineer g One Cambndge Center wmtn, sl Cambndge.Masse operatl Tel:800 Cirtle 20 on Reader Servme Card y . 4 fill nit . :f _ 9 ISO CERTIFICATION COMPLETES THE PICTURE. The American name itself has long been a symbol of testing and measuring equipment,training of personnel, excellence. In fad we pride ourselves on the toughness of our documentation,etc.-from the time your order is placed until quality assurance standards.Bemuse the tougher we are,the the product is delivered. So you can be confident that better the pipe you receive.We just wanted a second opinion. American's quality,performance,reliability,and accountability That's why we asked the British Standards Institute to exceed the highest expectations in the world—yours. evaluate us for ISO 9000 Certification.Our reason?You,the When you specify pipe,accept nothing less than the customer, For your benefit,using ISO's stringent evaluation 150 assurance that complements the quality of American pipe process,we confirmed that our quality control was the best and finings. And remember,making the best pipe in the in the business.We monitor and control everything about industry is our hallmark. AMERICAN your pipe-not only physical and metallurgical characteristics, ISO certification simplyAWM DUCTILE but also product identification and traceability,calibration of completes the picture. IRON PIPE i _ A Dhamn 0 ACll PO.B.D27.Bbmingham.AL 35202,Cmmmn 5.w I M x12Af%P I23411, Y PAY I am xd3.33x8,I nmm�:h ✓/ np —in,pca.mm.A m n Equal E nda, pnl 0ppanumry4AnnnaW m&aon Emda, ' Dunn&5ok,N,1.1I1 Nkma.&,m, li Ch.,apa.Down,Kama,can,Wr inoWn,Now Ym4,Odanil haaa,h w and%,,an ama.Di q.k bmnao,m flurr nphcm,Kam,Cary.M,nnwppl'n,Plom Cary and Pompom Bva<h. 0.ka 21 pin A.".,WMa Car! aeu'hiLty hum as parties involved.In this case. wastewater problems. Even so,the financial with overwhelming public resistance. In the SRF policy most be changed in allow for the impact has been substantial.To finance the Auburn's case,however,public support for nuances of the design-build process, and anticipated improvements,the city has had to solving the city's wastewater problems has run approval of those changes is currently working increase user rates,from$11 per household high,and the City Council has had the political its way auough the state system. per month to$22 per month in June 1995 and will to see these increases through,ultimately The city of Auburn has had to find innova- again to$35 per month in June 1996.In many seeing the stage for the long-tenn viability of five ways to address almost every facet of its communities.increases of this size would meet the wastewater treatment system. BETTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARE BUILT ON BUSINESS FUNDAMENTALS By Ray Orvin,Executive Director,and Lauren Hildebrand,Supervisor of Engineering,Western Carolina Regional Sewer Aulhoft Greenville SC And Dan Skalsky,Brown and Caldwell,Atlanta,GA PubEc utilities are under intense pres- business process flow diagrams helped iden& ble to workers using various platforms,the sure to cut costs while maintaining bottlenecks,gaps,and dead ends that lead authority,will be able to use a greater variety service. This would be a Herculean to inefficiency.For example,the complexity of of existing hardware and incorporate more rchallenge,but for the advent of infer- the purchase requisition development,main- powerful hardware and software into the sys- mation technologies that save labor and time toring, and approval process severely tem. Utilities and many other businesses are while increasing exponentially the types of impaired the authoriy's purchasing and pro- just now recognizing the relatively low cost data accessible to utility professionals. comment efficiency. and rapidly expanding capabilities that In its drive to stay competitive,the West- From these findings,the authority devel- intranet technology offers. ern Carolina Regional Sewer Authority oiled its vision for the future and evaluated MORE TIMELY MAIMTMIALMCE (WCRSA)in Greenville,South Carolina chose the viability of ways to cut costs within that As in many organizations. historical to taus on updating its information technow framework. Once information system needs knowledge about the operating and mafnte- gy systems. were defined.the major tasks were to select nanm costs associated with various pieces of The authority has found the chief benefit technology with the greatest return on invest- wastewater-related equipment tests largely in of embracing information technology to be sys ment.and to determine the implementation the minds of key WCRSA staff. But as the tematic and efficient access to utility informx schedule. authority's service area grows,the ability to tion on an enterprise-wide basis. The Merging the information technology and gain access to this information is increasingly authority's previous information systems situ- business process evaluations kept the focus on difficult. And as long-term staff members ply could not support its data needs—as business objectives. Having defined current retire,undocumented system knowledge dis, defined in a"vision statement'the authority business processes and a vision for the future. appears. developed to set strategy for the future. the authority could evaluate the benefits of The authority's maintenance information For example,WCRSA found that its once information systems,including both discrete management system is now composed of sepa staleof-theart Cobol systems increasingly low and enterprise-wide applications. rate single.user software packages,but that iced the transfer of information between open- IMPROVING INFORIMTION ACCESS will soon change.Then the system will play a ating groups. The custom applications Concerns about the previous Cobol sys� critical role in achieving the aim of a mainte requited to extract information from the aging tem's Wear 2000'compatibility accelerated marine program that is at least 70 percent pre Cobol databases were becoming increasingly adoption of the new system. The requirements ventttive.In addition,it will increase the useful unproductive, for new financial and purchasing systems have life of equipment and reduce downtime and Revamping the authority's information been defined.and the time line will be deter- repair costs Longer-term benefits include the systems emerged as the leading solution in mined by the results of a Year 2000 assess ability to track equipment performance for use the battle to stay competitive,but first utility meet and dam interface considerations. in future purchasing decisions,as well as managers faced the diflicvll task of mapping Many of the authorty s office automation quickly evaluate decisions such as cost-to- out and implementing a strategy for future tasks will be accomplished through an Intranet repair versuscust4wreplace. operations that would reduce costs. —a costeffective way to distribute large quanta By integrating the maintenance.inventw With 90.000 customers in the Greenville ties minformation throughout the organization. ry,and purchasing systems,information will area,WCRSA operates and maintains more Much of the information sharing will be pass easily and accuratey from work order to than 1.5 million feet of trunk lines and 12 handled through budding a centralized dam inventory(to determine whether the necessary wastewater treatment plasm, warehouse.This will be expanded with virtu- supplies are on hand).to purchasing,if nems- To begin reducing costs.the authority at'dam-trtarts.'These are smaller dambases sary.Information about materials and supplies implemented a'business process evaluation' maintained by units of the organization for purchases then wfll be sent to the life cycle traditionally used by private utilities.This their own regular needs.They are,in effect cost database for future analysis. process allowed the authority to identify ways subsets of the dam warehouses and can WCRSA is umdemldng the kind of infer- to streamline business functions and to cash speed access and processing of the data coo- matiom systems-based reengineering that lish a framework for successful adoption of mined in them because the number of users will be expected of virtually every waste- new information. simultaneously accessing the warehouse is water authority in the future. By connecting The authority used a consultant to idenw smaller better information technology to a deep fr and document current business processes The intranet will also reduce costs understanding of the fundamental business and dam flows.The result was a summary of though the use of`thinner'clients less functions the organization must execute.this the critical people,actions,and decisions that expensive computers that receive dam and run process is opening the door to dramatic long. coaectively described how the authority was applications and greater platiorm indepen. term improvements in productivity and ser- conducting its business. Review of WCRSA dense.Since intranet applications are access( vice quality. ENR Spedal Advertising Sedioa A-19 CLOSEUP: AN AGENCY MAKEOVER IN CALIFORNIA By Stephen t Hayashi,General Manager/DisMct Engineer And Dr.Judi Berzon,Human Resources Adminishator Union Sanitary District,California In January, 1996. Union Sanitary District USD is a special district providing waste Since 1988,employees had been involved (USD) began a three-year process 1. water collection,treatment. and disposal for in changes that transformed the District from become the public sector ahemative to run three cities in the San Francisco Bay Area. an autocratic.mledriven bureaucracy to one e operations.prtvafizafion.consolidation. The District serves a total population of just more oriented to employees. Roles and or takeover. It wasn't the USD's lust aaempt a1 under 300,000 and has a wastewater flow of 30 responsibilities had been redefined;collabora meeting the demands of a changing marker- on through one treatment plant. USD five union-management relations had replaced place,but 0 successful it war create a radially employs a staff of 130 and has a S19 million the traditional adversarial approach:and per- different operation for the 21s1 cenNn', annual operating budget. sooner systems had been revamped. In addi- tion.staff members had received substantul training in leadership techniques,communira ""}Jrr` WAL Iron and problem-solving;cross-divisional teams had beeneen esubGshed to address Iechni cal and organizational issues:and an innovative budgeting system known as Expenditure Con, EEMU M"Nfip tmr Budget (ECB) had been adopted. Impk• orientation of the ECB,which encourages . saving and eliminates the traditional-spendon ., the 1/nit/ word or-Ioseii'Ihteitem budget,is based on funding In sitework takeoff for the achievement of service levels.Between FY 1993 and the end of FY 1996.over S2 and �Q/g0� �4'�7762 lion in savings had been returned to the vUUii��//II ratepayers.Foully,the Disoia had also begun performing services for other agencies on a Call Now! - We'll fax our brochure within 5 minutes fee-fomervice basis. Services include imple- or your next personal Pan Azza is on us. menting and managing the urban runoff pro- www.maraeorp.com/walsh gram for Fremont.the largest city in the USD service area:ckming sewer lines for a neigh, pZ' Specializing in Computerized Earthwork Takeoff boring city performing laboratory area yses for With 5 Aglek Systems plus TerraModel and MicroStation local agencies: and recruiting personnel for We can handle all your paper and CAD plan needs FAST otheragencies. .c Q' Complete Div 2.Sitework Takeoff-- the bigger the bener. These earlier efforts laid the groundwork ;a U;F Complete Div 3.Concrete Takeoff-- we did a 600.00o Cyjob for the District to move forward with a more • Value Engineering • Cost Consulting • Construction Claims thorough makeover. When employees were • Bidding Strategies • Internet Consultants • All around nice guys made aware of the external threats of privatiza, lion and contract operations,they derided to Alreadybatea takwr take the initiative to prevent privatization by rr erw,wa..,: using existing pnvatesector organization mod- , els to become"competitive.-They also agreed = �`�c "A seCoadOpufrOaws - to use a cooperative union-management i ® •W bti a\ways a good\deli approach to rum the District into a"highyer. fomunce organization." In May. 1996.union and management „ere 22 on Read.,service .. - jointly selected a consulting team with exper. rise in both labor-management partnerships Killam Group of Companies Offers Full Service Public/ and work redesign.The consultants recom Private Partnerships in Water Resources Management mended using the"critical mass meetings" P S approach that encourages input from a majori ty of (hose affected by a decision. This approach to change is based on four assume _ input the people who the work know it best ` tnput er solfrom a variety of fightpe ogle in the s bet. mom. ter solutions:gel the right people in the mom, , and decisions can be made right then and there:and a large enough number of people • F C 0 M P A N I E S must be present to move forward and get dmrgs done. 000-832-3272 . 27 Bleeker SL, Millburn, NJ 07041 The critical mass meetings approach was ��gpgg NJ-W-PA-MA-Cr•NHr MI.OH-WV-R. launched in July, 1996. Over the next sin Ems` wwwkillam.eom months.the consultants held a series of rive Circle 23 on Reader service Card A-20 Spatial AdrRdr6g slow Pat S T E D 0 L December 2nd�th, 7997 Sheraton Washington Hotel Washington, DC a : Ss. e' PE H u H 0Sponsored By: E.J. Krause&Associates/Environmental Industry Associations Official Spannuoring Publication X � III For More Information on this Hazardous Waste Management.Contaminated Site Clean-up Event. Complete Form and Fax or Mail m EJK. _gttending Con/erence �Attending Fxhibils� _ Exhibiting rvama 7n1e Company l City Stne Zip Phone Fea E.J.Krause&Associataz.Inc. E-mail esso aocx sprme o.fve,suns soc 9/97 ENR Dur New eetne.d,,Mo zoenn t2s 13ot1/11Ma Fea 13at1 a93-5]05 ►htip://www.ejkrause.com/enviroshows Going Global flemedlahon Ponq ang 00n6gemeal Warms "®"" s.mMnrt MNA.PrmiAl. $aemm.mwerewn' nmmgel PM'semnnaew r IPeml°IfPA WdWinia*vo m EPAS AYrP 9[]g-IOf79 a a. u'r sur[epxeisl I��- " "` ': �swlanw:ArmiranpMRNnmemmsnee 10:70-I1:00 ANN.eRdmalMaen HNim 'Ana,s,"nefwnnwferrMua,nin—mu. 11:00-12:30 are Mempewm MPwram l nei.rnmueann mmmwxryxnwmelm enters The WorldtAenda flemetliation Policy and 'maamrnnmfnwwmnralPolrn aumwreiHeren,gMls NrBmmnNmsrrea SESSION/ Nrpvm Agenda Management Approa[hesl MAIPeryAgnemewi -en"un,I..-,vans.MNmgma ♦smAmnuw.f.leasbmwNm Nvlm 12:10-2:00 Ennlamrrnlrexennri 'FMnirrMnmi Gmuraf Brenr,wXmAPntny "Amr.lean xmueaPe.xiPNS1e Arum 2:00-5:]0 Oil&Gas Senor feemeclavon Policy and InKmpauMana AemMa°w" 'Dwnneelm flmlwanemn Ma Mane 4n°mer SESS/ON2 Challenges l:World[Aae Management Approaches ll "UIM NFPA W:ume°urmn ro 5°{mr aRpA SarP Jemt lne.V4nas" Acme "Sae Ran"nnmeeb Beeenleanmr re me 7:]0-5:00 Oil&Gas Senor Challenges It: Altemawe Dispute Remlutian Detnnfmror¢rmxr Ace SESS/ON3 Latin Amens SmimY Remaliaide Priory -".n l Arownnem Case SeWres Urber me ml Mmapmem MPnmAn 11 "I.,,"In.MCI I'd Mulnae IMerar 'C.,,.A,.Manaperrrer,ulna l674M , A¢paan°m 2:45-9:19 SgmRmnrlvANme flemeewlwn .sm enll"rrwMld.EeeerelNmrlimi ""'—" mefu.ure°lBrmv+nerds Emwe Mare, 9:00-10:30 Slre them Enforcement in due LIIildmnE Health 'xannl X01 yS11e, eiel gained, SESSION4 Wesdem Hemisphere Imtraliva C"dr MMMY14n InN9kgY RImMr •FAA tceaters°1 mddrP BrexnM1el¢granls ant emg mP>gumf.¢.m.ng lean lrmermnee 10:30-11:00 'RNN PaMt roB AMutt fluurrtmmn aN Celrsr a Iw. Side' 1100-12:30 Implementing ISO 14000 Environmental fmianA:RXamen Dspm RmMix Swim M:Seaimem Renediaime SESSIONS and EMSplems WarIcNade Justice IPDTIw Im uXelarrerv,MORoutere50N- "aemm0lrm°I SmrmenU Br oreco.g 5ralu5 rrw rxmramsaaunrswainei, arehasenm' 12:]0-2:00 Swim N:CAiI1mY Want leiliNn [p Um DleESMmemfrenNn lere lx, 2:99-3:39 India EmDahS on HazWaste ISO tACOD/Em nmental IPa+elm untmrwnremnX°r[nemnanN Jertevlren°� SESS/ON6 "mini-Pamlers Sought Wriagenuent Smlems [Nmttni Malnnl -&a.Gm.Xlms lw Emnannuul Ontgrng fwN.ID EminwamlJrum 710-Si0 India u Case Studied ° rn Puarlunmte Natural rigecResource 'Enwwme—ni�Dur[earm4gmyAp rml[ •u$Dwpi Pr ErgrmersmMYerrnnlee SESSION) pallNign PerrvaminN Damages Suve'Awsid,aseate fleprnryA[Iw°et al Swi°nR Ras4aernAMin' Sffid, $mr WDWrnie" 'EMU Fnnlam[nralmiemdimbl' 'atymaM Pminurm°rGMmaem CM°w 5bm5udwemerwram.SAu[m mum BiSION Landes and wmrrsme SESS/ON9p nt hula pmPI@Ilhmeflrllurer+ (pi, s,,aeuuX°nM°aeaYarbanhsrrrmnmfmnrce SESSIOi0 1 Ih PotnAtM Aemuranm0enfrms' m9n SESSIONeste 'AiWlfw Sped,idrMAI ne°I A4w •ermenthiild"ItmM Fnvrlvmmmral lxnnm yvar6wpU6aneuas Swiln N:DaiIlNq DeadVe'd" m ➢:SION5 'Emwunmenralnur... eFvxwaen am 'B°eempana,rennadOHvnlamrmnm usurp SESSION IO s it Bash lMr- me rp[nxnxl rRnlrwryv •fpaDDOweaxmtanlee 'iminrDe[PmmriwNrymmervarwAGas I:ZS-Z:00 Sawm."Aid. velinaDwpu 1^°°frry pare 'low iempC.Annueer."°ron°n Ckens lynalwrllaLereftmfaxuuve ONer $rru[twes CwramrmrMwrin V0C5- burden M:OMain MmalinirnnTirm eneA �fdviNN:Gaminl DaitlnirnA IMdCERO,ire .)Ne Mind 2xrerra 'Aemeemrnud,OM+ur Ccmamrre,el Ma,nnrs sAh.fevimgmen111FN fw CEflCIASxrIm)Diaamr feNenN ReulrPm Ahmlam. al!es Bum.MO 'lreatmmr°Ir°w(evn Orpanrcs rn .. - uw.inmaab. -AemNraM+°r D,wmranlamrrmrmnraranab mmnpmaalarmnen ,r. l • ,a 'Ste lminlgdrMiaM aaynptf4fle[MWes sl iunet BPMn.MC-fluYARefimee185ues lw Rtrannn" "Remeebtm SmIPann1M0/"w4rprvnusi MnexRmaaonmlsanv afFwHC'IArehrml "ISkurrunrnv ODnl 4lm ixwSlm$uIwnt.g Wei mr Swl GaS ad Time,AmA. AS CfldepnuUmlcnead, Tenn.,- smSCUwidwu4rRwanAl°servmS'$aaAe eeAernlcl eE'nrdN,awgtldr a Amtv laiuy" j En am RFMlimnimnin AparESl "G."all dRxerrs- Owug$eanvl f "flapelnSuu Aemv el°ILMwlmreepgPnra RArm Gro°newarer Flu[rwrrmi Amnll:Pmire Amelieti°n ngec.-Usry S°r14yNryyb Aum IPdnPI01 "I'll, EPMSPA 00Eant000 'Reelem5.Rannoumm Ufmg6rnundyn 'Analm501/mOnew iKnnOlw flemMr Inl11 In : atcun lire elrews Pl EPA,Nmmsurm Snlems l°APmen LNAk hen Grwlrmwart- [myes "m Atu lnemnr OPtaplren°IPCBi sererfwmreNrmsr Emsn M:WaasamarutlshmuPAAnpe mSwalers°n[nl°nnatu wPnnfaupnm°re Swinn N In Sh claimed orientation AWNRRSMRAwm W. mubuwrrmrlM -futrdnry 0/MSir,fenlm(rke fnNlmn Or IParel of nrrc°t nexryrnls o°Addue rsbure IPeul oI000.fP4 arbmnen Nert[ust EP45 Auien2uminnen liana Olganru(aptraron FllotalNfNl awrvrP maxryrelamsl mwunwa ruY alU 000s rmge wanb mxsae 'bKn°CM RPmuwOn%,.",I fwmm SmkUNmvtvaumd' smsN:4aesnlnllMPIDNAaIaAaila fwwbDi°bawemABPluim Aee Yale' "Zer°Yelerce Meralflwtrn Wall IPaMlerva,FUS.rewDannM mmemv' Aa'Yrmntnm '9rnr vs reredln,Sr Wan Semh Ani",and Ueevuoanwnq¢'R.,niane«ssw "CmWDnMn IumN' wramron Min ardMvsum lreamremal F.Pronns C0.nrATMMttO50ra' -B1'tlue iNlaliyilp$°Il ymDl "M$rNRIOr$GlP Tell 014nfm+nMPbl fomhRYPIIMene/eYeN:YNiaaY gmygrymt Pelmuep CMmrull menrWDlldrrM Fwrpeq MmPmam "consenearscmwm)ret lw Lpgfnes $°mn5xmrn 5mnarr[aMM1ll$weriumSr¢" nu,n nmemu,aamem¢rp."Ica'si [mramrwlet$ars" "fin's.r°lxrgn xwrcum Sanalm] Hv;iF:f'� meal asce[nernM memrruaramr°nnfel "RPmmrnron0l£mlmrve':sul,nan° 1 emxrw Sevione Ndm Mewawb 'halrids,le,mlw°o15w:51urrybols ier fwirosl NrSPpieO A-d mil.,Fv Smirn 9wImNMlwu Pr.,areurearn C.'s".vbr Me AemNUrmelGdawns 'I nSUeronheurPNfwraree WJn yrmne El Relf Wamn a 'Natare°ui Waite Managmrenf Mamemp Ad,T.ar Derr' Ilrsrallatrmv14n5PammG Snrm:' lrandrura[mnrelnanaveiamenpsta[e CNlleyes aMGrnwrnp n,rnnrrres" -Nw rid Erenenmrclren of Gdwrres lrvwyn 'Ap✓ruranalAv,$u[rlgn$nslbw .rnamrralutnesl 'Mnnuq[rvrrnBlmwoverrrems rnrwlM Polwrrw. SdverM Flttrmr!ae]r" GmuMware Senry' fwirn6 RN4eeumdm W°real'°n "A had Scare All,510,Is,fardi "Ernanernenr or$ar i dear fnMuen wlP -PM°mann Atrefsmem iwfnnromnenrn •fPn fpealPnnvuPe Cwbmwne$ul.anside near RMmfreeuMnxMny' OxrSwn MaYmp "$wl Va°w Ex..n S.C.urn, "E-°grin Scrrenrrg Minoan"unpile mun,-...ran"- •fPeLl Rrenssdlbtwenye Legisianre.ReegulalolV. Special waste Geanups Remediagon Issues 6loundwalef lemeaiaton Business Issues 6 faliq ssues and Inlermaeon 101 EXHIBIT VIEWING _ Suolrlvne Realnirolrsallon I' anciallssrlesm Srre IPaoel.Cu.nmusiev' intscm Sediment Remetlration Paasise flemediation GnuMw-ale,RemWialion Remetlationa LUNCH—EXHIBIT VIEWING EPA Mon......meSuperhrm flemeduums,of Mining 00...done Contairvnenl Gmund Entudincnl Recircation rvcRemem��and! Meant closed Canlydssm, FIG"Reform Building Deconnmireuons Air Spmgirp GrOundvaly in antl MEnRarcM In-Situ RomedixOn ergers erW[praplidalims ll _.S.II�Nm�rTu.r _ wrm.�iu'drmL .. ..- ...,._._._�.`� 5. Case SludY Illegal Use of a Remedial an of Petrolavm Physical Treatment is The Glre 99 npi Role ol�"- Pemi<itle Connor reared saes Connmiland Sails Grounawater lmesupelion l the, dustryE nnmennl Manage, lOegM Use of a Penlcide'Media Management and Cleanup of In Situ SoilTnalmenl GlpunOwater lnvesllpatiOn ll Insunweluues and Emergenry Management Range Wastes LUNCH—EXHIBIT VIEWING Pollution Prevention Blatnaanent of EAplosiixe In-Situ Cfiemlrsl S0lidificaon Groundwater Investigation 111 Information Management EPA RrsOonsiOle,Pam Search Dionm flemedmim, New ApWaatoes to Passive Soil Gas Sampling Inn met Use Process at Times Beech Save Tme and Mon" Conditioning 1lgnodY Risk Assessment an BmwnfiRldR NOTE: EXHIBITION HOURS ♦ and Ell neme,F mm Ended,selection Wednesay,Decerber3.............10:00-0:00PM and Local laangm owner:Eprum Wednesday,December 3.............10:00-$:00 Pm . Became I al I eralundult: PostLleanvOManels Thursday,December 4................ . Pm hdenl InNineiwa LUNCH—EXHIBIT VIE ING 'Mprarix Rm AlxfSmMl Ae[rameMa Nullivi if S.hossomuNhenna "CwmxnunalGewNenwsil [rcrn 'ANnmurlg Your Swervembry GrynM1' fen"i eeil Mewlxlwxgb[Mrry' fnAmn11m5miNmetlnnonl VhIIS Ia Parree NrY P✓CWeIU Seuiu2lulniVneeul LelMRry 'MgIn9 fMndflYY After+mMrnaNrll -NGVDCP An lmpvdpve 5olulron l0 '(el3nulmmN-a MUl6ry nI Oe H01Ni IFMrloryMaYM lrpn EPG.00L 101.13 MeuDemml pe[rsron' CmremmreOGmwpweler gemmmren' vnann3 er Lrpunm.aleRemrem:LOlmn! 'An GKMm911n 5Ju grtr[al GreuMVNnr INlpr[alana Numpu(aIM%ennp' n"-WnMMfIom4Me[P+Irxlxp. SemNnR Renhfekcaen Gnmalrm Well lxMolryns" fmminmerfennaaeeolfin e 'O5a51We...DS w+ol Ve )nns rem 'Irnxplrry ienin9 Po"nn lw.vNMwrenrem fnrivnF.4rmxwerer lnrMilerree 111 IParcl OlFxarerlwcrvNunvmegerseM flW Elrrmd1eS 05IMflBCA Mo]N FrpRlrm3 "Um of aehx]W9rmam5anyn^Mmulefm pe4mfln lMrcmearalrm rwfMaM r3 Srre SmnM1:SnrIVaWrgld' Snui}d'KKMS leflrmllYie$lips GlrrMIN+ AwLGwManrNMuaulmrl/rtY'Sµerivf xn M OnNxICOn" mn lM lwurrnalan Avnesys Frrsar(nw of CdnmYNry&!M flame%Sek -ln, e.'Ammnu en MnmenveellMdlrK to 'PonielP LrouMxOM1rflrmMre4M5r3lem fnerenM TReeRmlin RMelhelel d, [rmn' Nino.lrnl' 'Cne Slun dcerarrngaMManeammDa fn.,mime,mmeler 'Ina GmerrcanCwealm henrM%<" Pump area lreer$vRer Ipanemscearerpmm mdnulxrwm Armen 'C0.TJrale flame%Sele[Ilon pLlgfilun[UI faeuenlA4nunMnerRninuleaenul 'MttILDmICmIrdSMGwmurergemMkrrp" rrpn•reaa[Irm Om9ramt 3uz[nluellYrse! Mroelrn 44erNNda Aenutllnimll D 'Cures mvdN'1 nnmanonelXlful Nmimn:M1nmfeilpnf�eNy xp nnleart annrmmenml 4uiwll➢N6LNmoe Meem .4.0kin...1011ANUIl -flemmmmwlrmmr W 1 gCne idrrcnore aae mrnuesl 'onfunnq Reruuxrknolnwnanrr I.aM 'In SrtnFemenrelwnnem ANG unrgme Uev Faxew Swl Ga+Sumrera[nemealaro feuienm'.Nvnmelmme nkfmrlmmema15ucerirme Sxf lzirre Iemnpi[P,' $emmod"unnmfxnm- I%ne:uscedrwxenvnpmrorae Im sassed 'Mlenaprp lrlrt nrl u ",c 'hmnuuM MSnnmry wren Pamre Sod cmrgepnmemrnelpu[¢I •fII MMlmm�lN Brn'emNnnM rn$Mlhw Wapr,mk KurlN' Les Se.As -1.11lleAnemlo, Axlreerome 6euimek lMwmelimmeuMuer I�eem."heemem."doo {rorW ganmemolfmummenorgynnwn+ -Ammr'°'w neelSpeu Nww+lo 'lluolCmrvlronrAonnpnf eMllanwia pn.0eanrp$menl Creenue Rryra+'' 6.1w olCmme•L,u NeNnn:4rlMxna Reveliewn Lnxxrarve Cmramrmm�umei 'Le(tlE�Intiifil Inlwmarmn I-sls Usrrn 'fnw.mnk Wlo,renmSeM[nyr q+ryn 'Re6ur{d Cux..1.rrymr 1 Is. 01,inl:mennlFWn[dlxnn 51Wn5' Cmnulls,lmsl SNUNM Ufnp Me VarmreFm3 GIOWa:' rOmezweremm.tt0 'I enlgelffi ilp$VF SKIem re flerMelar! Seuienel:Fuxiel done,lnfMReANielNn fneienellenMthe MnuuVJCeMPo3rcla Cmnmrnrrmul Ellernx5undumGrttWWnn[Ixlwi 'Polminlgmrr,J,,lFvrcxlNwkzem ,glnrlWe.enrmrtea LlwewiMeliSWMGxry4leMAll$Ile' ynimS6rnedwn 'WIiN ll f",nnfNlMrcfmwarrq Meuinre $uxrfwbflnprtnmme bremel 'We SII Pmrx cNMa DWR 'an'.flen",gnawnnN loll In A e E[o=o*rcs' RaeirYlna suhMa[e GWRme' $vexnxe LeRlryr[mwmSW le 'Pevra Cnl .,. me0xmmm�em An AmnnDNuxmu3Wxle Mlwmsnm 'Rw knripgrekpi0lpl Mfe Eaexn¢+ Cnn,"r vl S,,:som:Sdmal on"me3' M eselv"I'lonpmennm..Cnr .1.1e-1r33m5(emrmhem m.Saar{rpa OWrpiflnuxeminlf ela$uArfW$ixin Vl' AkMN3/MPnneWU hr$uLNfuneflemNur Mllom We05rIi A[um3' •p00+xare.mnrM •1meYelRmevMlb Gaye �l IF •a 4 i :ulz..uusum:uvsvwgfvu nuo-411 ....a.gl''m- - ;Ju�. (PisWuai3'r you .0 PRINT ONRY(as You wish it la appear on yarn badge) ❑Mr. ❑Ms. ❑Dr. I DEADLINE FOR PREREGISTRATION IS NOVEMBER 14-AFTER THIS DATE.REGISTER ON-SITE First Name: LOU Name: Toe: Company- Address: Cite ® Stm: m lip: ® Country. Phone: Fllail: Fax: a "im,41,191O 1.MANUFACTURING: ]el sera., EARLY STANDARD ]A] Oe ..r a"'.."nWm PWerrarled BY10710N7 Posteerted Aker lO/ION7 am a em RED)EXHIBITS ONLY S20.00 9500 DY [anruFwrrwn DAS listoonS Rnopee IFCIFULL CONFERENCE CONFERENCE(Pr.eaVeri well 5515.00 $690.00 aY r.l—n&Ful h000rr 4lvr IFCPI FULL CONFERENCE lRxNgsrrcll 5600.W f690.00 au m°'°a"ua Pe41e4 nvauu IFCG)GOV.FULL CONFERENCE/p„.n.„serl) S425g0(@BW S42500112&LJ ]u Myc. vlee'E 11 "ounde DAv Mxnwntra�Ee[uuu IHC)NWMA Member Full Lonl.lfla'dlgs rrKll 3$50.00 f$60.00 OAI; HaW ISO FuIIBme students 550.00(1OBgal 360.00(IQBBW DAII HnYN CONFERENCE-ONE DAY ONLY MODOO M50.00 DAI} Mw.eau-WUMA1SkLq DAD vnree�w.of Wrawinm[e Tue_Wed Thu_ SUBTOTAL I DAIS ft. Pinuv , I DAG lkr ex_ A x�y TRAINING COURSE Werynoday,DecamberJ, 1997 ]AI6 Inne4nrm ]AD Nrona Nu[flv4uss Applicarionot EPA d CORPS Air Monitoring Technologies tar Hazardous WasteSim. ]Ate "W'"'A ee'" aAn saw.Cur&Gia"PrPaan •Registrants o/this course can attend Thursday sessions offt Hfasm World&the exhibition a Am wait onceselLmri J Ayr wnn lLuwN hell complimentary,(Limited seating-Borg rewsrerdY October 27J GGIscoursel aAa wmu sau4pelpvwaq Fee: f275.00 aA21 ma"" a A}[ Government Role: S725.00 Ovw 1pYu uxiM1r 3.PLEASE CHECK YOUR PRIMARY PROCEEDINGS(Availab)e Do Site) SUBTOTAL _ JOB FUNCTIONF11clE:Ir lore saw as, Nr.wmertEwow.r Primed version only SI15.00 JB! Swwvertrom xems.: f l E Federal number needed or snrppmg ar add SB 95 shr JN verD.rm AsnrBvrerasa Ne.e9er pprrg lUS ONl YI 58.95 I ]& jeere a umnitlM1imarierer, aes Fmmmrsuerr"ne"enl Erwe, FedEx Attounl/ JBfi Adnelxe4wehgm lvaweSHery SUBTOTAL NA6 14re ]BN9 Amu,kae'n` , PAYMENT POLICY TOTALWE Date 9alg WeneAm+mnanw"Per :�,... .., CMCIS srould be ma0epavmOro NyW W4ndbuceduro onlane venesse � J BII 11xrNurgSrer nwese pans AEUSi Nsldm arNMUSicemrnesramamr svauon leeammnr ONlY Ahaa rM snaemswll OB13B Lev Mren+WM.nrv9 atmrrpary e9r : rieewa W. wonderedJB14 aro 1peev ep[rm CANCELLATION POLICY 3.IN YOUR JOB FUNCTION,DO YOU AnurceOrrp+s MUSTbererenadmemrrg 50°,vltM reganabvn ree wucerelumee unm fklroer JI. 199) RECOMMEND,SPECIFY OR PURCHASE NO rarcemrrms wlrtra[reelMaher(klvoer J1, 199)Srrbsnrurrons anyrmr ANY OF THE WLLOY/OaF:Imeei AU emavNl acr ramewsw.e: METHOD OF PAYMENT JO fmpte"Eruwwa r a rmwrm stsnn Llure Check enclosed payable to:HaaWsm Wodd/Supedund❑ am NWamw Mrle wrW,W E"eprc"r Original purchase order in standard tee enclosed❑ PD J6 Maw.wTwawws5waae El VISA ❑ MC ❑ AMEX ]O UawrwvfirF feeiflorne Jm ft. ahm¢TawY rwnn Ja rbvw Pelsare Dn^+g Account Number. Exp Dale. J r PaRm alvis eEMp Garger cn JCII Mw VMb flpnafrauees Signature las shmw on cartlf ]CO Rdir Bax4rip Fa.Pwm - acD SNI4ase tee rPrtnVSman .�.-yyc .. _. ]Cle wNrYp40Pma ... ]CIS 9pafpawewwrt4mweemrcea OC17 ew¢IFmomeemxv Fax ICIN m6pLale Rd Suite 10 payment6,S,.n¢ JCD Nber ranrprnruwvpusmN XeEWaste World 13610 N.Scarsdale Rd.Suite tOda6.Scvtlstlale.AZ 85254. acts paw PlArNmrohl For questions.call 301/4935500. For Imemel Use Only ❑PO ❑INWr ❑CC a CX _ je 1 large meetings,each of which lasted several days and focused on one element of change. Approximately 50 to 90 employees attended rn each one, and nearly all District employees attended at least one. Underlying the agency makeover were m pp C several assumptions about the"old"and"new" 'yyy N N cultures. In the old culture,employees felt U they were entitled to a job,whereas in the new N culture employees know they are responsible if a for their own careers. The idea that the Dis trict will take care of its employees for life has take two years or more to complete the O a been replaced with the understanding that the makeover.To address job security,aunion- District will help employees develop their skills management task force was formed and then y ID while they are employed. Formerly,employ. trained in the techniques of"interest-based E ees didn't have to worry about costs:now they bargaining." A"Job Security Agreement"was C know that costs must be reduced to become negotiated and signed s reorg 'va November, .Key 0 •� competitive. One important tenet has not points include:no layoffs due to the reorgan C w changed,however. In both the old and the ban for 30 months;no increase in sewer set- ,�0 H new cultures,District staff will "go the extra vice rates in 1997 or 1998 and no increase mile"to deliver outstanding service in both greater than the consumer price index in 1999; routine and emergency situations. retraining.crosstraming and reassignment w ONION-MGNAGEME PAHMMSN1P options;and severance. G o The first conference developed the part- AGENC1 DESIGN '� nership between the union and management The redesign phase culminated in the as a key first step.Approximately 50 manage development of a template for the new organ; C ment stall and union employees represented nation during a threeday conference attended by Local worked for several days, by 90 employees.Design criteria included: 1) U a bothh together and in separate caucuses,to rectum waste:2)ensure customer satisfaction: 0 O formalize the partnership in a"Mumal Expec- 3) allow the work to Bow easily and naturally; 2. LM C cations AgreemenL"This document defines 4) promote growth;5) maximize the use of N N the relationship between the union contract technology,and 6)create jobs that have aaton- E and the new partnership agreement;identifies may, challenge, variety, and meaning. m C j behavior that will support the partnership: Employees initially identified ten different a O recognizes the rights of each group;d'dferen- designs! These ideas were then refined,mo& tiates between decision-making on union. lied.or eliminated. The final design.affirmed C management issues and operational issues; in separate votes by both management and the ty and commits "both management and the union,is based on the concepts of'a high-per- union...to individually accept responsibility fomlance work organization" for our actions and advocate this principle to This design reduces both the"layers"of U the rest of the District".The Mutual Expects management and numbers o a Mid- [ions Agreement was a critical step in build- and upper-level managementf staff staff wentnt QJ from t ing trust and promoting dialogue among all nine to four. Four groups with self-directed U employees. work teams were created,which meant that tU Next,employees at all levels of the organk traditional supervisory and lead worker jobs o Mini developed the District's inca les."T of were redefined. Support each work dews IL Mission,Vision.and Guiding Principles."The tralized and folded into each work group.A (� latter are a series of brief, strong statements union-management Steering Committee was that describe the organizational values for the created,and other changes were made. District.At the Customer Conference,staff AB employees in each work group prtic4 members heard external and internal cus- gated in the design of their teams,using the comers describe areas where the District suo criteria employed in the agency design. i ceeds and those in which improvement is Employees were educated about different Serving local and national needed.Finalh.in preparation for the Techni types of teams: functional, crossfunctional, 9 cllentsirom more 50 al Conference,employees gathered Worms multiskilled, and networking. Data obtained lion from other ublifies and private agencies to from creating flowcharts"best practices site offices In 20states. Fora identify"best practices:and they also ana. visits,and other sources were used The pars listing of offices orspisclBC Iyzed USD work processes. meters for dating a Onto included the follow- Inforrnatlon on the services During the redesign process,the issue of ing: teams are to be composed of six to 12 Temacon provides.call... job security became increasingly important. people;they must reflect the District's Mission, The employees wanted the Board to give them Vision,and Guiding Principles:and they must time to meet the goal of becoming a compe& be self-0Gected (eventually). Many traditional 800-593-7777 five service provider. The Board wanted to supervisory functions will now be the team's work with the employees as long as they could responsibility,including daily planning and carry out thew fiduciary responsibility to the scheduling;safety:total quality.including as www.teffacon.com Q ratepayers.The Board recognized that it would Comer service and technology,budgeting and Cbcb 24 en Rotlar Urvla Cntl A•gl FNR Spedil Adverlidnp Shim goal of no rate increase through the reduction of 16 positions,eight through attrition and eight through an early retirement program In fact.these and other cost-saving measures have resulted in a S2 million reduction in the District's overall operating budget for FY 1998. Many difficult issues were encountered, primarily in the area of employment security, ' both during the design and the implements. lion. The District is now nuking decisions General about selection and reassignment of union. manager management and professional employees:bar. far gaining unit status of newly created positions: pr, compensation for new responsibilities:the th, impact of proposed ehmdnation of lead worker classifications;and implementation of a Team ch Treatment Technical Facilitator position. So &gyp'a Collection �A�-"'s supV-t/ The ambitious timeline for the District's ga Seraiees " bees Car er redesign has been possible because there was sit Service 'organizational readiness to undertake such a of a massive effort Employee involvement.collabm cap $ native union-management relations,an entre pr, preneurlal approach, and employee training inf purchasing for the team:training.conflict mar, sewer lines,while the second team will handle were the foundation for the new organztioo. to agement,and labor relations;and time cards, construcdon activities.A support team compris Without these strengths,it is unlikely that the leave and overtime tracking,and dissemination ing infomudon systems,purchasing,and other District could have moved toward becoming ne of basic benefits information. administradve staff was also created.The Treat. an organization which(awes on customer sat- 10 The Collection Services work group treat. mem@ Disposal group created four crossfunc isfaction, understands statistical thinking, su ed two multi-skilled teams (meaning all the tional teams, each composed of wastewater knows how to address ineffective and ineffi- viz workers an perform all the functional,replao operations,maintenance,and laboratory staff, cient work processes,invohes the workers in let ing seven separate crews. One team will be as well as one administrative support tam. making collective decisions,and strives for C, responsible for inspection and maintenance of The District has been able to meet the continuous improvement. in �� rl l S now VV A �1 L�+�"c � rtry�' a t . . Y0jNE R, SEE OUR BEST But you have confidence in knowing that we've been there. Weare one of the world's le;idingGrouncl Modificatioecontractors. With proven experience on projects of�Irisiaes,.-r�-I—,--"5�-��. extensive resources a ,pbicpmsence,we can provide the solutions you need. Anytime.Anywhere. Vibno Systems - jet Grouting Compaction Grouting'- Chemical Gnouting - Cement Gmuting - Soilfrac'Grouting Injection Systems for Expansivi�Soils - Dynamic Deep HOW TO DO BUSINESS WITH A REENGINEERED AGENCY By Jean FaMn Dramatic changes are in the works m engineering design and construction relation Trent Accounting Standards Board are final'ved. manv municipal wastewater agencies, ships to design/build teams. Manufacturers And many stales have tided that lowcost bids but what effects are they having on con of products•such as the chemicals,pipes and need not be the only'way in pmnue Services, .harts,contractors and product man. other equipment that wastewater agencies In this tumultuous environment. those (adorers'How are these service and product use.are responding to demands for better who provide services to the wastewater agen- providers changing in order to keep up with quality at lower cost with product innovations cies are finding both risk and opportunity. their clients demands? and to changes in purchasing with new mar- Peter J.tau.protect director at Roy F.Weston. r "rhe financial side of the equation has keting strategies. welcomes the new procurement processes t changed for the municipal agencies,"says The over-arching goal of the re-engi. which emphasize value rather than cost.'Pr Steve Fangmann,vice president.Dvirka and neered public wastewater ageney­costeffec- comment is more businesslike.much more j BarWucci,who formerly was Deputy Commis five performance—is spawning a number of qualityariented.'he says. `More doors are s sioner of the Nassau County(nty)Department trends:more benchmarking:a wider range of open to us now that we aren't competing strict. a of Public Works•responsible for all wastewater procurement methods;more flexibility in marn, IT on low bid. Now a significant number of and water operadons.'7bey are attempting in agement and labor practices:greater callabora- clients(want) the highest quality product for a provide more services while holding or reduc- lion and use of teams:and innovations in competitive price.not necessarily low bid.' ing drew rates.We have to find innovative ways construction,ownership and operations. Black&Veatrh,meanwhile,has a group to help them do that." Other drivers are at work too.A January speciali&g in benchnurkmg studies,with its The'wastewater revolution'is still very, 1997 ruling from the Internal Revenue Service own database of performance comparisons. new,but a few signs of the future are starting in effect pemuls longterm contracts with prim 1bere's been a lot of headway in the last three to emerge.Environmental engineers and con- vate operators rather than three-to-five year years in benchmarldng,and a lot of studies are sulmnts are broadening their range of ser- terms,altering the financial equation in a way being done,'says Myron Olstein,director of vices into fields such as finance, operations, that can attract greater private financing. utility improvement services for Black& m legislative affairs and community relations. Accountability for performance will come under Veatch.who has worked on benchmarking r Construction contractors are leaming to work greater scrutiny when new financial reporting studies for the Water Environment Research in a variety of frameworks, from traditional 1 standards now being developed by the Oovem- Continued on E-26 .: . Ai., z .: "Doing more for less." Simple words. Complex issues. Who can steer you through? mPoTr EFFICIENCY,BROWN pMB CAIBWEIL BPINGBATBTAI PERpECIIBE. Doing j i Critics befieve there is a simple answer to running a more efficient utility. Privatization. , But it's not always the right answer.Brown and Caldwell can help show you why.We are ' i a leading environmental engineering firm that specializes in helping municipal utilities implement efficient transitions to more productive systems and processes.Working ' collaboratively with you every step of the way,well help you run your utility more like a business,because that's what it is. With detailed understanding and careful analysis of your unique operating and environmental situation,Brown and Caldwell helps answer vital questions like these: Do your people have the tools and skills to operate facilities at optimum levels?How best canyou measure and enhance their performance? T VIIIIIiiiiii Well increased automation 'save you you money or cause more problems than it soh-es? Before launching into costly expansion,can existing plants and infrastructure be tuned for ¢ better performance? 4 Will capital improvements address today'' concerns as well as those 20 years down the road? ` Even if it all sounds good will the impact of o r - ry. changes mat community expectations? — _ �4 sslBle� i i i I sIDLEs.APPROACHES TO REDUCED COSTS. Spending le l Using comparisons to other"benchmark How much can expanded use of computer communities,"what costs are out of line? systems and remote monitoring devices What can be done? reduce labor costs? Have you considered product sales gas, Will immediate reduction of operation i biosolids, and ultra pure water? expenses jeopardize future improvements? Or quality ofservice today? Have you considered all the options negotiating the contract with your power provider?Are you optimizing operational procedures to avoid rate surcharges? i i Will investing more money during design ultimately save millions by helping you avoid future retrofitting? y � Should you be outsourcing? t 1 i RA N 1 i ENVIRONMENTALSENSE BUSINESS SENSE' 4 Start getting answers now.Call 1-800-727-2224 `; rj cats.au..ar.a.awns.4.41 See you at WEFTEC-Booth 01032 Contfnned/rnm E-23 and collection systems, are refocusing their 1 E Foundation and others.The cumulative result marketing away from engineering firms • of benchmarking studies is a shift from anecdw toward the end users of the equipment in the tat evidence to analytical insight.For instance, municipal agencies. 'Me agencces are more Gi ' says Olstem.his firm recently used its database experienced now and as they make upgrades to rather quickly compare one client's opera- and retrofits to plants built in the 1970s and tions to other municipal models,WE how they 1980s.they want more reliable equipment,' I compared overall and howdifferent parlsofthe says David Oswalt, sales manager for 1 organization fared,while also showing what it water/wastewater equipment.Gorman-Rupp. would coal to shdl to contract operations. 'Also,they no longer have to use N.S. EnvF •s Haley &Aldrich, Inc.,an underground torments! Protection Agency) procurement - engineering specialist-is a first-Get subcontrac- guidelines because they are no longer using lot to major environmental engineering and EPA funding.The cities are often paying for consulting firms.It is finding that the pressure the equipment and they are determining what aY for cost-efficiency is not hampering its efforts equipment will be used.' - in sell advanced tunneling and trenchles;tech Some companies expect traditional engi nology to municipal wastewater agencies. 'In neering,design and constructing contracting 1' urban environments,there is lots of interest in to increasingly be replaced with design/build putting in new pipelines without opening up arrangements. In Seattle, the City Council streets. People aren't holding back because of this year signed a groundbreaking contract i € _ money,'when it comes to rehabilitating aging with CDM PHILIP to develop the$100 mil- I infaswcture.says Ed Kilmer,president and bon.Murillion gallon per day Toll River Fil- chief operating officer. In Salem, MA, the nation Plant using a design/build/operate South Essex Sewerage District was willing to contracting approach,with savings estimated try an innovative approach.including solid at $70 million over conventional arrange- i rack excavation and underground construe- ments.CDM PHILIP is a consortium forted r lion,to solve a difficult siting problem-anoth by Camp Dresser&• McKee and Philip Utili- f er sign that performance and value count more ties Management Corporation,with construe- s than pinching pennies. Lion contracted out to Dillingham Product manufacturers such as Gunnar. Construction NA,Inc. -another example of Rupp.which makes pumps and package pump the trend toward greater use of teams on Versar, Inc. — a professional mg stations for wastewater treanent plants large municipal projects as has become come monplace on complex federal government t projects. s serkes firm specializing in: One area of keen interest to agencies and thew vendors alike is the future role of private • Maria ement SerVl(eS ■ entities-through design/build/operate agree g ments,contract operations; or even, in rare m S cases, full privatization.Although only a tiny • EafilitieJ and Information "'p "' friction of public wastewater facilities are cow matt operations today,the recent 116 change is t Management expected to stimulate greater interest. Woodard&Curran claims to be the"first t • Mign and (onitru(tlon and only second-generation contract opera r lions firm in the U.S.,having taken the scan- t Bards and roaches developed..duringthe for Profess Industries '70s and '80s and reinvented them in a way • Environmental ServlfeJ that dramatically improves performance and t increases client control.'According to Wdf When America needs to move liquids Peterson, senior vice president for training t Usk they cell on Rain for Rent. We have and operations.Woodard & Curran has 21 `.e,•',��,•c the pumps you need:from high volume contract operations today,up from none only submersibles to diesel powered,vacuum five years 0' t assisted sell primers. Our pumps are t 68So Versar (enter rugged and reliable,able to meet vour While it's not completely clear how corw /, strictest requirements. Pipelineremals,mo' panies will be doing business with re-engi. � 1pringfeld, VAiiiS For all vour2a hour emergency pump, neered agencies five or ten years;hence.them pipe and tank maul needs,call today and cenanllysmmsrtung back'We can no Longer t r800 ZVERSAR pot Rain for Rent on Your team. You'll be w2lk in.find out about a job opportunity,then glad you did go back and put a proposal together,' says i Tun Shea vice president of municipal business www.vz8;-7R1) SOLUTIONS PROVIDING Inc.development, Parsons ing nearing Science, SOLUTIONS FROM Inc !We're definitely doing business with the www.versar.(omLOCATIONS ACROSS reengineered agency in a new way and we'll COD] AMERICA see a lot more change before we settle into i 17 Offices in the US and Europe mother pattern." , Circle n on Reader servtq CY• Circle IIp on Reader Service card A-26 Spadd Advedisial Stall ENR I i . SAN DIEGO O _ _ HOPES TO HIT THE TARGET WITH "BID-TO-GOAL" By Susan Hamilton,Assistant Director, Metropolitan Wastewater Department, Ciry,of San Diego,California And John F.Williams,Senior Vice President and National Director,Municipal Advocacy and Economics,HDR Engineering,Inc. n early' 1997 the Metropolitan Wastewater Department of the City of San Diego launched an effort to show it could meet the City's efficiency demands without tak. ing the road toward private operation. It rejected bidding against private companies in favor of a new process called"bid-lo-goat*in which it agreed to target a specific dollar f amount of savings and to incorporate more private-sector methodologies for operation • and maintenance.If it succeeded.the depart. ment would be spared the threat of privatize lion for as long as its"bid-to-goal"contract • was in effect _ From the beginning, the department's aim was to deliver w ratepayers the kind of • • savings they could expect from a private operation, while protecting employees from • the emotional ravages of competing against potential"low ball"bids from the private sec- TREAT IT s for that could never be maintained once the t public agency folded.The process isn't over MAKES • WORLD yen the City Council isn't expected to vote on the"bid.togoal"contract until late Sep. tember.If approved,the department will pre- • DIFFERENCE ! e pare a bid and service level agreement y within 30 days.The target will be a reduction d from the base budget of 18.9%over the first i two years. g The process has not been pain-free. THE CSF- STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM 1 Exhaustive benchmarking was required to y compare San Diegos utility to others across EFFECraVE inds n-daedy N .an Rana.. the country, both public and private. Man. Hbh rreh ers........,n Nil.-. e agers agreed that a certain number of post- vmwntE snneaad and Cea,orn Delon.In, . bons had to be eliminated. And ultimate wide Vann,orAppl—n—s e success rested on gaining the support of - C MIMC Dnignnl so Max,­Emciee. 'r many individuals and groups, particularly w.or t.and M uauan En—na—, n ° e1 ECONOMICAL 5-ple oat l C n Matins art labor,who were involved from the beginning s in focus groups and detailed planning. In the _ - .s end,the department found that staffing goals STORMWATER- 1. could be achieved through attrition and not MANAGEMENT e fillip over 50 vacancies that were already �a"d'm e',is I,, tics` 11 H Y _„h Tnn'.,.at -r.I iJ a«..wK..�...n..empty because because of a two.Year.sea-imposed W. visit a-APwA,Booth•loss p ILnlaml.U,aryn••nmpdu MarvLnJ freeze.ing NnionJ MW WnninF 4nm.—,(ryJiry 1-eon-$49..yari-/ San Diego Is probably the first wastewater lass.Manalnmen•e."..._ wR... department to actually try the"bid-to-goal" Circle 19 — Read., service Card 1R FNR Spedol Adeertisng Sivioa A•27 approach.However,certain factors tend m ae reconstruction of all costs associated with the 30%over the base cost of service,mm ervative ate a positive climate for it such as:the time existing operator. assumptions of less than 20%are generally needed to effect the changes needed to Second.idendfv the cost of service if pro used when identifying the final target goal. become competitive;a recent significant invest- vided by a private company as the result of a Tx[seova AND SCHIUMPU meat in the infrastructure:the desire by lot competitive bidding process. A goal must be matched to a specific communities to have clear targets:and a hest Third,identify a competitive target range. scope of services with performance parameters fancy on the pan of contract operation comps With the understanding that there are signifi- detailed in the contract The goal represents ties to participate in managed competition. cant hazards associated with focusing at the the minimum savings required to compk with Establishing the goal is one of the most floor of the competitive range,an effort is made the process;however,incentives can be built difficult parts of the process. What should the to adjust the target to a point that reflects a prim into the service agreement to encourage adds goal be? To establish the goal,three steps vote company's cost of optimal operation plus a fionzl savings. must be taken. modest profit corporate overhead,admdnistra The time allowed for the development of a Full,identify the curtent cost for the ser- don.travel and transition costs VIn le the pri public offering,or contract should be limited vices targeted. This requires a bottom up sate sector costs could range between 20X and to less than one year (from the beginning of the Bid-to-Goal process) in order to provide a strong incentive for action. U it is not submit ted within the time allotted,the community te ���yt..pp {�11 �j�t \y/rp�r t�r,r�,p should DVANErit bids fromD1De InivaQOA or. q.Wtp .U. ono JL1LLL V'IiLLLLJI'L'L AYVAMTAfdSs a t10vative OAL Bld'LPfi0al la aI1111nova1lVP comp In sav- ings and efficiency; rewards rate-pavers: A transportation system of flooded stmers may be romantic in Venire,but retains and maximizes community control of in most places it would be a disaster.Today,Woolpert sets the pace with its major investments:and encourages the spk, it of comm mit-v and emplovee parmers rip. tm7mology-based capabilities like developing watershed and transportation There W.however,drawbacks to Bidio models that can link to a GIS to help make sure the only thing flowing in Goal. Communities considering this strategy _Your sleets is MEic. must realize that thew goals will likely be cri4 cited as not being wfcient or at the level that What's more,engineering,GIPS/sunmY, photogrammetry,and informa- a private company rill claim to be able to beat lion technology can combine with planning, architecture, landscape (consider the challenge bidders would have i( then numbers were revealed prior to closing architecture, and environmental services to create even more cwvcdul tools for mum aging your P the procurement process). There will were Grid � 6 Yo assets. cistn from potential bidders that they were not afforded an opportunity to compete. An added Were in our 97th year of solving and preventing problems. problem could result from the public man- To find out more about Woolpert, wise by our websitc. agers.supervisors and labor not cooperating in - Or better vet,give us a call. the development of an offer. However,these concerns can be balanced by the benefits of the strategy and the existence of the option to go d'nectly to competitive bidding ff results are not achieved. The BidaoGoal process was designed to provide powerful positive and negative incew fives for change. It fies the interests of both management and labor together in an effort that ends with a public-public partnership with the communities they serve. Agencies that use the best techniques of both the public and pri vale worlds will be positioned to provide maxi mum savings within a reasonable time frame. They will be pennined to operate Eke private companies as long as they comply with their operating agreements. 1; the end,the post- lions available to a community are expanded and competitive forces are used to assure a win for the local role payers The San Diego wastewater department meanwhile,has crafted a complex agreement with a rely iveh,simple objective:to achieve a specific dollar amount of savings with clear performance levels over the court of the five year agreement (with a possible one-year extension).U it weeds.it wdl have a charm to stay in business­andthen try again. A-28 Special Ad,eriu. nit DIR erne 30.n n.aae,s.rvm.care P"ti 9 k SAVES TIME AND MONEY Trenchless 27" Vylon Slipliner (3 LF shorts) in Topeka, Ks. Renews 30" concrete under main line railroad. �/ rmn Frono nst I I I ISP Bradshaw Construction used the manhole for access and sliplined 200 LF of 30" concrete pipe under the Southern Pacific Railroad, in live flow conditions.The contractor had limited access with the Waste Water Treatment Plant on one side of the railroad tracks and the Missouri River on the opposite side. 27"Vylon Slipliner(3ft.shorts)is assembled inside standard manhole. Contractor used push ring and steel cable for liner insertion in -live flow"conditions. 1 1 1 1 1 LAMS®N MON PIPE LEADERS OF THE UNDERGROUND For more information on the Vylon advantages, please call your local Vylon sales manager, sales agent or call Lamson Vylon Pipe direct at 1.800-382.0862 in Cleveland, Ohio. cord. 31 en Rasa.r s.rvma c,m PORTLAND USES CSO PROGRAM TO BENEFIT NEIGHBORHOODS By John tang,CIP Group Manager,Bureau of Environmental Services,Cary of Portland,Oregon Non H.Nont,Vice President,and Ann Dethner,Communications Project Manager,Sverdrup Civil,Inc. combined sewer mvecaow (CSO) pro- gram might seem an unlikely vehicle to promote dozen involvement and urban 'taliretion.However,when the Port- land,Oregon,City Council began planning its - .�.: ... 17-year wastewater construction program,its % members demanded more than pipes,pumps and plants.The CSO projects have actively involved the community in the decision-mark- _ ing process,and have leveraged public con- struction dollars to create neighborhood ' benefits and draw private investment to the city's renter. The public investment is substantial.like many cities,Portland established its waste water system in the 191h century.Today,rain The Ponlond CSO project will hoprove the water qualify in the Wlliomefle River. creates overflows of almost sir billion gallons of combined sewage into the Wdlamette River downtown and the R illamene River.The cirys options.Adjusting the pipeline alignment also and the Columbia Slough every year.The S700 plans to acquire a plant site and pipeline right. provided a rightrof-way for sidewalks in the million CSO program will remove extraneous of-way,and to"daylight"Tanner Creek by business district,and a neighborhood connec- water,use the natural environment to treat removing it from the sewer pipe.could provide don to a citywide hiking mail. storm water,and expand the city's wastewater community benefits—parks,green space,a TIEreEMS FOR MANY COM UNITIs treatment facilities.Together, Portland's water feature and river access—that would Preserving natural as well as neighbor. Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) and enhance the new neighborhood hood environments,storm water treatment in Sverdrup Civil,Inc.(program managers for the Still in the planning stages,these CSO North Portland is renewing the wetlands bor- project)win manage the design and mnshuc projects and their recreational benefits are dering the Columbia Slough.Conveying the tion of more than 150 projects including.4.000 already drawing private investment to the river storm water to an abandoned industrial water- stonn water infiltration sumps.10 miles of coo district The owners of a 34-acTe industrial par- front area new constructed wetlands provide lection and storage tunnels,two major stream cel are proposing new housing development in passive storm water treatment, reclaim the diversions.20 miles of sewer separation the area As the CSO and other public improve areas natural environment and restore wadlife pipelines,and two wet weather treatment fad& ments are completed,the developer will gain habitats.High Khan]students are expanding ties in Portland's growing neighborhoods and corresponding increases in allowable housing their environmental studies by monitoring the business districts. densities. Portland's construction projects, wetlands recovery. THE RIVER DISTRICT RENAISSANCE from its convention center to the light rail sys Citywide,the downspout disconnection Described as"undefined and featureless" tem,have stimulated construction of private program is involving a wider community in the in a 1992 plan.the industrial browntelds in and public improvements 10 to 50 times the CSO program.The city offers financial incen Portland's river district might seem like an cost of the original public investnmts. lives to homeowners who disconnect their Ideal site for a wet weather treatment facility. MORE THAN-A RID PIPE- downspouts from the sanitary sewer system,or The River District Steering Committee,a With more than 60 active neighborhood the city will do the work for them at no charge. group of business people,residents and com- groups,planning for the alignment and coo- More than 900 volunteers from community munity activists agreed,but not because of its struction of a four-mile,fi to 12-toot diameter groups and middle schools have helped sign remote location.'their goal was not to isolate pipeline required active citizen involvement, up homeowners.disconnect downspouts and the plant,but rather to make it the center of a The North Portland neighborhoods,already earn funds for thew loci projects.Eliminating new community. the site of the city's largest wastewater treat- this extraneous water from the system will The conunmee's charge was to help the ment plant,came out in force when the first reduce the combined sewer overflows and metropolitan area handle projected population planning announcements were distributed allow rainwater to flow naturally across lawns. growth of more than 500.000 new residents by The BES launched a two-way communtyr "taw community has had an opportunity the year2010.The committee believed the the tions process that included several newslettm to help design the environmental infrastruc- future of the district—once a vibrant and door-to-door contact with businesses,and ture that will serve them in the future,"said diverse 19th century neighborhmod—would be more than 100 meetings and workshops.Peter Dean Marriott,BES director."It has changed found in its past.A revitalized river district Teneau, a neighborhood steering committee the way the community views its water could provide housing and attract complemeo- member,reports,"We've been involved from resources."In citywide polls,citizens now rank tary commercial development with less strain planning to construction and we've brought water quality as the area's most important envt on the c1N's infiastructure and quality of rife good ideas to the process." ronmental issue. From revitalizing neighbor- than the suburban sprawl that typically chamc. The comminee recommended that the hoods to creating recreational opportunities,to terizes rapid growth.The committee planned a tunnel spoil be used on site as an earthen noise planning long term water quality,the Portland commercial and residential center that would barrier for two neighborhoods.The approach CSO program moves the advantage of govern, house 15,000 people in a community close to was less expensive than traditional disposal ment,business and citizen collaboration. i A•30 Special Advertising Section SIR \''. M7�alu�agpmy ue ZE yagg \ I` wm8goww,in/lft4 Kstf9H51 f)%ei 0019-LFf($IE) sa!w'S'n o(ow ul sa�Wa pun— A—MAd PIPPO"ug 0005 v. luawdojanapaJ / ivawdoIanap pueJ aaumsisse aauegdwoa pue uonvado wawaAuew uonannsuoa aJm]e)nuew pue ugisap ivawdinba sis.(Ieue daoIeJogel \ SUOgeBIlSaAnl ayiluaps 2uuaaui$ua 8wllnsuoa R�\s s 3 1 N V d W O 3U30 4 N]1UEl. ,,, -salnsaa pue uoia nouul uapijuo:`pue �(.Ao LUea,L �:�- • uoi��a ' r-:�L�l�aan s,al 31007 1^Y i My� t-. ► - -a Wenhere s a By-past MIAMI•DADE^� STREAMLINES - WITH JOINT SERVICES By Bill Brant,Deputy Director, Miom@ade Water and Sewer Deportil And John Spencer,ON Hill,Inc. -i re Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Depar4 men, (GJVASD) is undergoing an - aggressive effort to explore all kinds of cost savings. One innovative idea is to join with other operating entities in the region. _ including public agencies.private mj ities.ven dors.and other businesses.to share services. - The range of thew"joint service agree ments' considered by MDWASD is quite broad.from the procurement of chemicals and equipment parts to sharing professional technt cal expertise for process control functions. It did not include the join(provision of basic udli Iv services. 'Shared services is not a new concept MDW.ASD found a number of examples of 12"Heavy Duty Trash Pump POTENTIAL AREAS FOR THOMPSON USE OF JOINT SERVICES • Chem] ConsunNon%tamria, Water Alper, RU&NXIcee of Supplies as a pumps to o it. Wmch,aw rcha,r C.rmwt Cenvaliang W hnuu•Operations Thompson pumps are respected the world over St., � h..• Facude,wihMcrCwdes for reliabilityand performance under the most Equipmem War.,Warehouv Spare Puts P Rstherrhen tuwy Niainuinmg Fun lnventory demanding conditions. Whether you rent, •Mery Readinu(meco-ie/6as/Wanrb lease or purchase a Thompson pump, you'll be •narver a nn"l("'nemtip.Wheeena Rem nil I'aers assured of maximum performance and Sale nl P�.er M1n i'rnk 5uuirg problem-solving results. Call today for more Power Comrxn Segotiadom independentor Joim w/Other Agendas information on Thompson Pumps and Joim Sniees fnr Power Nlaintvn me•for engineering assistance for your next project. Imertal Systems •Create,a Police Consortium to Address Common Reeulatum and/m Researeh Issuec -. .Sharing of Swfi for Specialized Reeds THOMPSON 0a c Conool Sµciab,t mmuuent Techtddans PUMP 6 MANUFACTURING CO.,INC Water Qualm, NloNmring • 4M vl alttr k.hit&W R rill Computer/Infonnauon System Specialist 1.000.76 .M0 tuxwwncrRend dSolids •• ••.• ' •\'chide Slamtvn:mee • �• • Rent('untran- (991176h1319-fAX 19011J61a763 Conmunion kquipmem!Vehicles I Count On Thompson For All Your Pumping Needs .;��n° ,yven- �ratio, .OIflIM6rwa'ICarr 1104.111113V1.uRr®•mrilwterFM4mtI81twxRwIH. •Spnieh dTechnicalF inown, 1, .YUIIRIW•XMYIMIIY 9aYR vIv6LLBL twat.Ulurara a tin nv1 UIInY. and/or Maintenance •W gmtR X.UallHrtaar IrIO)U A131s1®vet RUSH tfRry•moxr wwtANr•wa1PoXr turrets• •Fmereenrr Ream •Non :re 1�hern I:M I I u r i u��•.r i i rr � Wdsaping Sninro Ck.4 as .n ea.aa Servi..Caro A-32 $peeiol Advertising$edion fRR insight Innovation Ideas to advance your CompetitivenA In today's competitive marketplace, utilities need I-- maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of all resourceSEMA is helping utilities use a systems approach— ESSintegrating innovative work practices, addressingESS organizational issues, and applying the latest technologies. This approach fosters organizational cultures that balance improving productivity with protecting public safety. EMA has guided more than 125 public and investor-owned utilities in becoming competitive and in sustaining that competitiveness. Assistance is provided in work practices analysis and redesign; organization and staff development; and information and control technologies. Advance your competitiveneSS. Contact us for our new brochure and tap into the insight, innovation, and ideas that only an entrepreneurial firm can provide. Linking People a Technology for Business Result EMA Services,Inc.,1920 OaMcreIt Avenue,St.Paul,MN$5113.2624 6126395600 Inlo®ema-inccom bnp://www.e.4n1.com I enrnva n eH,cl IhI0uyh.al North A.. Cirt 1e 34 on Rearlar service Card r� CHOOSING COMPFIFITIVIENISS successful joint services agreements already optimize its standby and peak generating in operation. The North Carolina Purchasing power capability. ?" Consortium, for example,is a group of uti8- In the area of warehousing, MDWASD ties that negotiated a single, larger contract has vitiated an aggressive program to reduce under which chemicals would be bid by the inventory by requiring vendors of large equip group. The successful low bidder offers the ment to warehouse spare parts,o0s and lub6 cl- a same unit price for all of the agencies partints,and painting supplies. paling however,delivery charges may differ A number of possibilities exist for sharing based on the distance from the shipping point technical resources,including staff,laboratory DETECT t the delivery point or construction equipment,and contractual Meanwhile, several municipal utilities assistance,and these are being evaluated on a formed the North Carolina Policy Group 10 caseebycase basis. years to have a unified,larger voice on reg- Preliminary investigation indicated that SUBSURFACE ulatory matters. They work closely with the in the area of purchasing chemicals. PROBLEMS University system and when necessary partici MDWASD already received the maximum dis pate in joint research projects to support their counts for volume;however,other utilities in QU1CVurAND regulatory and legislative concerns. The the area may be able to save by joining forces. Southeast Florida Utility Council is similar,but MDWASD will continue to review possible w- is more involved in research and study. ings on bulk purchases of other items,such as NON-DESK RUCTIVELY Emergency disaster response is another construction materials. area in which witimale cooperation has been While joint services hold the promise of Perfect for a wi a range of engi- developed by utilities who rapidly mobilize to reducing costs,there an be obstacles,tun,such nearing applicaIons, Subsurface support each other in the event of a natural as:loss of direct control; increased coordination Interface Radar �61R) Systems can disaster such as a hurricane or tomado. and its costs;unwilling vendors;care icting pob In R In used pin jlolnt depth and After considerable amity,MDWASD has cy interests among organizations complex par. exact location ltf underground identified four areas as priorities for developing chasing requirements;and liability concerns. exact and❑onPf underground pipes. shared services:electric power,warehousing, Nonetheless,MDWASD has found from metalltechnical resources,and bulk purchasing. its evaluation of the potential for joint or shared In structural ariAsis, SIR Systems Deregulation of the electric power indus services that warehousing and electric power are used on b ildings, roads, try and the potential of retail wheeling of were two areas that did offer genuine savings. bridges and tuftels to identify power creates an opportunity to form power Success in these two areas will likely point reinforcing swell voids and struc. purchasing pools and negotiate lower rates toward others ways in which shared services tural conditions,F Until de-regulation occurs, MDWASD is pur- an be used tothz benefit of the utility and its Lemhow SIR Systems save time, suing agreements with its power utility that ratepayer in the years ahead. money and impqpire safety on the THINKING 'OUT OF THE BOX' job.Call fora(reE mnsWtation. ON ENERGY IN MIAMI-DADE Under an innovative new plan to mace chase costs over the long term:coincident direct pipeline purchases of natural gas the billing,self-generation,reliability improve- Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department ments and retail access. (MDWASD) expects to save$470,000 per Retail access is not available today,but GEOPHYSICAL SLIWEY SYSTEMS, INC. year. is on the horizon and could generate S2 mil. 13 Klein DrA-P.O. Box 97 Nabual gas and electric power puras lion savings in the firs to year and a 15 20 Norm Salem,JH 03073.0097 ea are maj chor energy expenditures required percent savings over the long ran.However, Telephone j6 3)893.1109 for operation of the MDWASD's three water self-generadon and reliability improvements Fax Telephone (61)89.93.1 treatment plants and three wastewater treat- clearly are available today. Because of the memplants.Ewh year MDWASD purchases costs imposed by operating difficulties aeat- E-Mail:GSSISALES@aol.com more than$4 million in annual gas and$13 ed by Oat terrain and storms in the Miami CHANGRJ�a THE WAY million in electric power.Significant oppornr area,power reliability improvements have THE WORLf EXPLORES aides to capture savings in both the gas and been selected as the fast way in capture sig electric energy markets were identified nifiant savings- an estimated$1 million in L;� w through a recentlycompleted competitive the first year with a net present value of S42millionassessment.An RFP for natural gas was ion over thefirst five years.Once reliab05Laved earlier this year,and a Pmceas is now ty improvements are made with the iauallaunder way to complete the utility's purchase tion of repositioned transmission breakersof natural gas directly from pipe0oe comps- and improved distribution feeder switches, aies.At the same time,the utility is proceed- MDWASD can begin changing its standby ing with regulatory approvals and generating procedures and capture these construction needed to access pipeline gas. savings,too. This is a major step for the utility that will MDWASD will evaluate selfgeneration generate immediate savings and pave the and retail access in the future.Inthe meanway for additional savings in the furore. time,the utility is continuing to make energy In addition,four different electric power conservation improvements to reduce supply options are being considered by demand and prepare for savings opportune MDWASD to reduce electric power put- des in the competitive energy market code 35 on n..d.r Se-r..c.m A-34 Special Advertising Sedion ENR To An Engineer, This Is A Work Of Art. ; J _ram At US Pipe,your job specifications are calculated and completion,we will work with you to help keep every drafttdintomwthanamererendering—tltevamek+ated phaseonscheduleand within budget intoaworkofa - For more than eighty,years,U.S.Pipes Rant Service Using our most adianced AutuCAD m1stem, US. Department has been meeting the stringentdemardsof Pipe can provide acuratelydetaileddmingsalong with the nation's leading municipalities.engineering firms and aducaleimnpipeandfittings lista reliableshipping construction companies.So.ifvour next project schedule, and a firm quote. From step one ® demandsnearperkxWnkommntofinish.call through the inevitable changes into your ioNs on LIS.Pipe.Wecan handle thedetailsforvou. \rtv IDc dS Axr. Ftutt me AT U.S. Pin 1'F llrvd Fxminrlmgam NI Rw IdlpArmmeh+n V.35\E Ru:n[J.-JJ' Y:\]I_1rf24'JW +4mh+f4.aklnn M1e14+vv:hAunA\+'\Uwwn t CItW 36 on RuWr prlric�C6rC CHOOSING COMF"WIV�ms OPINION CONSULTANTS CHOOSE AMONG ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES: INDEPENDENCE VS. VERTICAL INTEGRATION By Paul L Busch,Ph.D.,President and CEO,Malcolm Pantie Inc. e growth rate of U.S. consulting envi. core.This latter form of expansion,generally roamental engineering services in the msmricaOy,consultants are called vertical integration, provides entry, for ]990's has slowed from the halcyon days sought and valued because of consultants into a much broader realm of envim of the 70s and'80s.This has caused tan ronmental activities —estimated at 15 to 20 sternation as U.S.consulting firms work to them atpertise and independent, times the dollar volume of traditional environ expand business opportunities in a relatively unbiased judgment Will the public mental consulting. Oat marketplace,while many international page"unbiased judgment"in the Firms moving in this direction strongly firms are eager to enter the large U.S.environ g,mre as it has in the paid? believe that many utility clients will favor the mental market -onestopshopping" strategy which vertical Partly because competition is keen, integration supports.After all, environmental fewer consulting firms are expanding as antic more than five percent of the total environ- consultants often have a large array of skills to flatted,while some organizations are actually mental market—are still providing most support these related businesses, so the tech. shrinking.and merger and acquisition activity environmental engineering,science and plan- nologial changeover should be relatively easy. has jumped markedly.Paul Zofines,president ning services in the U.S. However,the cultural change from consultant of the Environmental Financial Consulting To continue expanding.many firms have to builder.from consultant to pnvatizer,or Group,estimates that as many as a quarter of decided to"go global"—by moving into the from consultant to facilities operator may be U.S. environmental consulting firms disap- growing intemational market and providing more difficult Only time will tell. peared during the 90's —by being acquired, services to utilities similar to those they offer Many consultants remain on the side- merging,or simply by going out of business. domestically. Other firms are broadening thew lines regarding vertical integration.taking a Despite these changes,however, no single range of services.exploiting opportunities in wait-and-see" approach — unwilling or firm dominates the market Instead, a large related environmental businesses such as unable in commit capital to enter these busi- number of relatively small firms — the desigmbuild,privatization,contract operations, nesses through acquisition or by forming biggest of them representing probably no design-buildoperate and equipment manufac strategic associations. However, most recog- VOLCLAV RIGHT NOW I TOUGHER I (IY I ATERSTORRX VEPTIC4 wl NNW M 1 C&ST SS 9 t'k wwassee canna Right now, COOLGUARD, the TOUGHEST, WIDEST and THICKEST geomembrane available is ready for your demanding project at a LOWER cost. •Coolguaod is the widen -"" •Coolguard hR exceptional Elwlov-based geomembram. performance for carbon are ' •Coolguard has the highest weath,nolg rsnaueot. tongue and trapezoid too N.ale greater We,and resisunce and superior quality of CaaWUMD teMdeatrength. Pamcuare..on Ise seem. CONCRETE JOINT WATERSTOP "" ^Y [al u.for your next protect. •Caotgune iesdu.ive . Easy to use featr,to eesign is most Ca11800.444.4023 . Proven Oual texture for trifocal tEy cantonment applications. � • Economical •Coninedf hay the arbors e L I and ind for hydrocarbons and industrial ehemicab. I' �►001@y s"no,,.=or„,,,..se„„aoenseo...r, IwMMp ManMbGmp „wwro�. tWmsxaao M46s N[ I]SO WnI]sure prrw•>nrplm Mtl.IL 6DYJe 1-800.527.9948.tax 847 5%6195 analog. For Down-To-Earth Solutions In a•om•mannaa. 'or'"'Zie'NO1L1'tl'"'nwuaa htoll.ralcocom •ornaaw.sua,.ru.nv aM WLInInm4enel Circle 37 on Reindeer Samoa Gre Comb as en INN,"reiN Care A-06 spaniel Advedising section ENR CHOOSING COMP""IVM"S nine that if their clients really like the results INTERNATIONAL of vertical integration•they and other firms that have not moved in that direction will be GREATER UTILITY COMPETITION unable to compete and will thus risk potential stagnation consulnent rgamizshare. IS A GLOBAL CONCERN A few consulting organ'vafions,among them Malcolm Pimie.Inc.,have defiberately and publicly chosen to avoid vernal integro- By Philip D.Gionhis,Division Vke President,Volu Add Management Services Division of Versor,Inc. don.We recognize that this is a very risky post And Ned White,Group Director,The Insghae for Public-Privole Partnerships don,completely opposite the direction favored by most market pundits,and one that will be Making water and wastewater utilities beyond controlling me cost of services or the much harder to change in the future—both more competitive is not an issue 'shrinking of government; it has more to do because it is difficult to change so public a unique to the United States,nor to a with nodal and economic survival. stance,and because late market entry will Particular political agenda.In fact,in the global 7Le world is not only getting smaller but requirean expensiwriameofatchap. arena the need for greater efficiency goes it also continues to find its populations Despite these risks.Malcolm Pirne and similarly aligned companies strongly affirm their decisions based upon two fundamental canons which originate in professional engi meeting codes of ethics:"Engineers shall hold paramount the Welty,health and welfare ofthe p public....'• and ".... shall avoid conflicts of / e interest'. Historically,consultants are sought and valued because of their expertise and indepen a r / a a r dent, unbiased judgment. Will the public nt gauge'unbiased judgment in the furore as It has in the past' Malcolm Pirnie decided to assure its in environmental "unbiased judgment by not integrating veni ally—staying out of the minefield of potential conflicts of interest that result from adding many businesses through vertical integration. Consulting / In this country of"checks and balances,'we believe that our independence will contribute to the balance by helping our utility clients to government and maintain the public most It is important to note that having a con- flict of interest does not inherently imply wrongdoing. Rather, it recognizes the undr sirable opportunity for conflict when more than one Competing interest is present. Films that have chosen to avoid vertical integration raise this issue:When an envirow mental consulting firm is retained to provide professional,independent,unbiased consulting service,to a client will it be Consistently per- ceived as clearly placing the public and client's interests above its awn when it has direct or indirect interest in providing contractor ser Oki - vices (such as ownership•contract operations, t maintenance, financing, equipment sales), i'�\ Air •'x through partnerships,alliances or mergers.as well as in providing traditional planning.design ` i and construction administration services? Our collective response has been to �s choose independence rather than vertical inte gallon,and to communicate the importance of independence to help protect the public well fare. Our strong belief,borne out by a survey _ of public minty decision makers that Malcolm Prne conducted in July 19%.is that enough Offices Ingineers,Scientists anners clients will favor the;approach to create a cone pefitive advantage enabling'independent-con MALCOLM suldng firms to sustain or in market �.t share in a smfic consulting marketplace. I I 800 t t ENR Special Advertising Section A-37 Circle 39 en Reader Service Card Specify Perfect Precast CHOOSING COMV"ITKVENESS Concrete Products increasingly concentrated in urban centers ernments, the Rand Water Authority.the Use the SMITH-MIDLAND Catalog of that are also economic centers.The Capacity largest bulk water supplier in South Africa EASI-SET products to support these populations and to provide and a quasi-public entity created by law, is SIERRA WALL— the foundation for economic development is engaged in developing and Conducting exten- directly related to the ability to provide the sive training programs to build the local Sountlwall,privacy necessary environmental infrastructure.Ade- capacity to operate, maintain and manage fence,structural wall _ quate water supply and wastewater manage- these utilities. ment have become essential to sustainable In Egypt there is little likelihood in the JJ HOOKS Safety economic development and an acceptable near future of largescale privatizations or pub. 1. Barrier — Positive quality of life.Too often, their absence is a lic-privale partnerships for political reasons. connection, double barrier to such growth. Nonetheless the Egyptian government,with face and single-face Whether we consider the Political transit financial assistance from the United States parapet, transition dons of Eestem Europe,the social transitions Agency for International Development and special designs of Southern Africa,or the economic transitions (USAID),is embarking on a major program to of the Pacific Basin,what we we is fairly simi build local capacity in the management of SLENDERWALL— lar.The governments in these very different water and wastewater utifities and to vain local Permanent,lightweight, regions of the world face common environ indite professionals in the concepts of a seR- extenor wall system for mental infrastructure management challenges: sustakdngutiliiv. new buildings and offering cogs ffective and reliable service to Public-privale partnerships have received renovations consumers that are more demanding of quality mixed reactions around the world,particularly and less toleanl of inefficiency. in Eastern Europe,where the government unW UtilltyfTelephone The new generation of leaders in a num- recently was perceived as the sole and best Vaults—Standard ber of countries is more objectively assessing provider of goods and services.In fact even in electrical,mechani- ` .�J the effectiveness of monopolies such as water more market-driven economies,it is still widety cal, telephone and and wastewater utilities.particularly where believed that government can better provide super size vaults, IC - thee have been allowed to operate without a services in areas that constimle natural monop junction boxes and ,, competitive vanlstick for performance efficie , olies. In spite of these deeply-held beliefs,prim speciality items ry and use of financial resources. eatiunion projects for water and wastewater Around the world,the message is clear. inhas"clure are underway in Poland, Hun feeEASI-SET® Preeasl improve the capacity, reliability and perfor- gary.Albania Romania and elsewhere. Concrete cast mace of environmental infrastructure,and Finally,Israel is a countre that is support. —Concrete rtl and Buildings look to public-private partnerships as a vehicle ing a variety of approaches to owning and t to bring cont—effective use of capital and opens. operating water and walenvater utilities, panda sizes from fional resources. However,there is no single including privatization.At the same time,it is 10'x 1 to 30'x gout global model as 10 how competitive utility man aggressively transferring management and fie custom options. Available throughout agement should be achieved. Every system, al responsibility from national to local govern North America although heavily technological in nature.oper- ment so that the utifities must become more When you want excellence in precast ales within a unique set of cultural,economic, selfsusmining. concrete products.backed by more than and pobtial considerations. Nevertheless.the Valu Add's projects over the last four years thirty-five years of experience, there's push for change and improvement an be wit. in both the U.S and overseas have shown that only one place to look— nessed almost everywhere. the major difference between the drivers in the thelogofEASI-SSMITH-MIDLAND Jakaedina. fin terms fwastor water has been United Slates and elsewhere is the issue ofcapF Catalog of EASI-SET divided in half in terms of wastewater manage Wfinancing. Municipalities;and special put- Precast Products. ment,with each half having been awarded to pose units of government in the United Sows separate teams (one led by Lyonnaise des have enjoyed a chap source of capital financ- To quality for your free Eaux and one led by Thames Water Plc).A ing through various grant and loan programs— SMITH-MIDLAND negotiated procurement process has been something rarely available in other countries. catalog with more than 75 pages underwav for over a year with the outcome to Internationally.governments at all levels are packed full of pictures,drawings and be a 30 year concession agreement. In all Wee looking to privatization as a means of access specifications,return this coupon with lihoad,the final concession agreements will ing private capital and introducing competi- your letterhead. have the concessionaires responsible for pro tiveness in the operation, maintenance and viding all of the necessary capital (debt and management of these essential assets. I am interested in: equity)needed to expand and upgrade the sys Public-private partnerships in global envF SIERRA WALL Safety Banner gems while also assuming the revenue risk on ronmenud inbrstucture are still in their infao SLENDERWALL - Vaults the projects. cy.However,one lesson is clear.there is much _ Precast Buildings The Republic of South Africa and its post from the experiences of water and wastewater apartheid government, meanwhile,vying no utilities around the world that an be applied in Name address the historical imbalance in eneiron the United States. despite haw advanced and Company mental infrastructure services,has embarked economically sound we none believe our ufih- Address on a dual-track program. It will combine lies are soda¢Likewise,there as there is much City State major publicly-funded projects to raise ser- from the U.S.experience that an benefit uti4 Zip Phone vices to defined minimum standards with an fies abroad.U.S.water and wauewater utilities aggressive privatization.education and pilot have an opportunity to reach ouL in programs program. Paralleling this national strategy, such as partnering and-twinning(exchanges and attempting to address the shortcomings between cities in different countries), to PO Box 300-Midland,VA 22726 in newly formed and restructured local gov- aggressively share their advances. • 5 041333266-DC Metro 703-323-5533 a.�i. .o.� a..e., service e..a A-31 Spatial Adverlisin3 Section ENR e e O 1F171'JIJO O t. l Celebrating 40 Years Since 1957, WESTON has exhibited the leadership and skills that help our clients meet the demands of changing and challenging times. Driven by a 'Developing To Last" discipline, WESTON fosters efficiencies and provides technologies and services that support our clients'economic goals. We look forward to the next 40 years. Consulting a Environmental Construction a Knowledge Solutions 1 Weston Way a West Chester, PA 19380 a 610,7013000 60 Offices and Affiliations Worldwide Click to WESM On The Web: ht�tp://www.rfwesron.som Visit our WEFTEC Booth #1771 cucm 41 on Reader serl— card a _ r t, I 1 l THE GOOD THING ABOUT INVESTING IN LAND IS THAT THERE'S A LIMITED SUPPLY. TOO BAD YOU CAN'T SAY THE SAME ABOUT POLLUTION LIABILITY. It sounds like a good idea:stimulate the economy by insurance program to help protect against asset devalua- putting contaminated dormant properties back to use. But tion. contingent liabilities and possible lawsuits. the risk to those involved can be hard to detect at first As the leading environmental insurer in the U.S., we Owners of contaminated sites must meet federal and have introduced many new products designed to protect state environmental regulations in order to snake the land companies against environmental exposure. suitable for sale or development. And as member companies of American International But even with the best intentions, cleanup costs can Group. Inc. (AIG),we have received triple-A ratings for exceed the expected limit and can pose financial risks to claims-paying ability from the major rating services. all parties in a property transaction. To find out how American International Companies - That's why the American International Companies" can help you keep a potential gold mine from becoming Cleanup Cost Cap Coverage is so important. It's designed a pollution liability disaster, give us a call at to protect both buyers and sellers of contaminated prop- 1-800-262-2634. Dept.895. am erties by capping cleanup cos¢ WORLD LEADERS IN INSURANCE AND BNANCIAL SERVICES And we can develop an overall environmental Ame o�INemaN0al tmmoanrti.)N Psf S1e1,Ne.YOa.NY IUt10 c Ysys aNssr seein.,w Ae na.ubs.N all us... PSundeNxtu.I Wq fe full Onails 0 cweage. Circa 42 an N.".,aaraieo And OISIt I!,011 A X 171 fo pp,09OSSD vv t4 Of " spw coot% A Ile, u of Times w Local governments got creative in the Wake of Proposition 13 to keep services flowing. But many officials sau the Legislature — and state voters — have combined forces to put them at the brink of insolvencu bq Noel Brinkerhoff Ask almost any member of a city council or county board of supervisors about the system of fmance under which local governments must operate and the answer is likely to revolve around a single notion: dysfunctional. Increasingly, local officials Find themselves in situations where the needs of theircommunities—be they road repairs, public safety,welfare assistance,or whatever—continue to expand and demand more funding,while the revenue sources that pay for these services either are plundered or become handcuffed by political decisions made beyond the local level. If it's not billions of dollars In property taxes being shifted each year from local government to help Sacramento balance the state budget. local officials complain, it's yet another ballot initiative making it rougher for local officials to raise the money needed for both 1=1 and state-mandated programs. In recent years, the debate has tended to focus on last November's Proposition 218or the property out shift that began earlier this decade.In fact,the discussion really started in June 1978.At that time,an overwhelming number ofvoters decided—with the passage of Proposition 13—that it was time to rollback skyrocketing property tax rates that were burdening millions of homeowners. The immediate consequence of this decision was the loss of S7 billion in revenue for local government programs,by upping the property tax rare at 1 percent of a property's assessed value. SEPTEMBER 1997 17 largest share of revenue cities receive — because of the shifting of property tax revenues from cities, counties and special districts by politicians in Sacramento. In 1992,with the state trying to resolve a multi-billion dollar deficit, lawmakers and Governor Pete Wilson created the Educa- tional Revenue Augmentation Fond(ERAF),which took over 1 [ I 1 1 I MEposterS26tlioninpropertytaxesawayfmmloczlgovcr enumd fe, used it to backfrll the state education budget.Since then,the shift has not only continued — despite the end of the recession—but grown in size because of inflation and new 1 I 1 I 11 I I I development,leaving cities and counties without S3.4 billion in annual property tax revenue that they would be receiving had it not been for the creation of ERAF. "The counties'fistal situation has deteriorated so much that we're the poster child for why things need to be I Wall; changed,"says Dan Wall,deputy director for the California Stare Association of Counties (CSAC). The problem has become so acute, says Wall, that counties —which have UlifG101d State t I 1 1 I I r absorbed 60 percentofthe financial loss from ERAF—have had to provide services with the fiscal equivalent of"band- . aids, bating wire and bubble gum- 1 he task of counties in providing services is especially d aunting even when ERAF isn The fixing of the rate of course has continued to be felt factored in.As an administradve arm of the over the years by local governments, along with another state,counties must operate not only their important—though unintended—change Proposition 13 _ own programs but those mandated by made: The shifting of control over property tax revenues Sacramento officials, programs that the state doesn't fully from local governments to the state.It is that transformation finance.Trial courts,for example,are an important element that has haunted locals ever since. in the state's judicial system and the counties must operate Following Proposition 13,other important changes,via them and provide 63 percent of their funding.In addition to the initiative process, have affected the fiscal operations of courts, counties also are responsible for providing public local governments. These include Proposition 4 [19791, and mental health,probation,and welfare programs forlocal creating a cap on government spending; Proposition 62 constimencs. (19861. instituting a two-thirds vote by local officials and a And then,there's Proposition 218.The sweeping initia- majority vote of the local electorate for new taxes; and live approved by voters in November 1996 clamps down on Proposition 218119961, which forced property-related fees the creation of new special taxing districts and requires that and assessments to be put on local ballots. As a result ofwhat neadv all of those in existence be subject to a confirmation has come to be known as "ballot-box badgering" over the vote taken among property,owners.Around the state city and past 20 years,California has developed a system of finance county managers and anomeys are struggling to figure out for local governments that frustnled officials describe as which new and existing property fees and assessments must piecemeal in design and disincentive in motivation. go before voters. "The incentives of the system don't make any sense," At least one major city has landed in court because of irs says Ron Bates, president of the California League of Cities implementation ofProposition 218.In San Diego,thedispute and mayor pro tempore of Los Alamitos. involves the collection of business-improvement fees that Echoing the same complaints heard from other local the city council chose to renew without voter approval, officials at the city and county level,Bates and his legislative insisting that the fees did not fall under the purview of allies point out that cities and counties have little motivation Proposition 218.The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, currently to allow new development when property tax which wrote Proposition 218,disagreed and is suing the city eamings are increasingly swallowed by the state. "If local to have the fees placed on the local ballot.The organization governments allow development in their communities and also is monitoring implementation of Proposition 218 by property taxes increase as a result of that development,then other cities,with the expectition that other legal battles are local governments should be allowed to keep that increase on the horizon. to pay for services," says Assemblyman Fred Aguilar (R- "This is our first enforcement action out of about half a Chino),former mayor of Chino. _dozen to a dozen we're going to be fling,"Jonathan Coupal, "The state always talks the talk about having a balance the association's legal affairs director, told the San Diego of jobs and housing and eliminating sprawl,'agrees Assent- Union-Tribune. blytnan Michael Sweeney(D-Hayward),another alumnus of While they are in substantial agreement about the local government."But all the fiscal incentives are to pursue burden ofe ERAF shift,cities and counties find themselves sales tax generators now,to get the new Wal-Mart or Home divided over the way in which those property taxes that do Depot or the new car dealership.- flow their way are divvied up. Soon after the passage of Indeed, local governments have grown increasingly Proposition 13, the Legislature adopted what's now com- dependent on sales tax earnings—it now constitutes the monly referred to as the AB 8 formula—an allocation system 18 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL of property tax dollars based on tax revenues that were million wound up becoming a casualty of the budget S / generated before 1978.It is a formula that has split cities and endgame, when Wilson opted to pay off a $1.36 mart W counties into"haves"and"have-nots,"since it rewards local judgement in one lump sum(see"Budget Blues,"page??) entities that had high property tax rates before Proposition The ERAF money Wilson proposed also did not impress 13 with more money and punishes so-called "no-low" tax people like Aguilar and Sweeney, who argue that the cities by allocating them less. proposal doesn't even amount to a fteeu in the growth. Wall agrees that inequities do exist among locals.but he Sweeney complains bitterly about being "tag-teamed" by also believes that-to pick on the formula is to miss the point." Wilson and Senate President pro Tempore Bill La'kyer(D- What's important to remember,Wall explains,is that all local Hayward), who helped Wilson by blocking their efforts in entities are at disadvantage because of the structure of the the Legislature. "My sense is that pockyed is not at all finance system.Consequently,Wall believes there has to be sympathetic to getting those IERAFI dollars back to local serious and comprehensive reform of the way local govem- government," says Sweeney. ments receive their funding. The fact that state officials are reluctant to part with But whether change happens in pieces or sysremed- ERAF's billions comes as no surprise to league of California rally,1=1govemments fama long and tough battle with the Cities lobbyist DwightStenbakken,who has lobbied without same political forces that helped create the problem in the success to have the property tax money remmed via budget first place. negotiations."It IERAFI is like a heroin addiction—onceyou Take ERAF for instance. Last year Aguiar carried legis- get it in the veins you don't want to give it up; says lation that would have capped the growth of ERAF art locals Stenbakken. wouldn't lose any more property tax revenue.And although According to the Mann,administration,though,it is the the bill cleared the Legislature without any opposition, counties who are hooked—hooked on money that they Wilson rejected it, saying in his veto message that "it is would never have gotten had it net been for the passage of inappropriate to approve a piecemeal approach to local Proposition 13."We're taking local government money that govemmem financing reform." we gave them," said state Finance Director Craig Brown. But a comprehensive approach — for which Wilson "The property-tax shift was undoing that to meet state called last year — never m terialiud during this year's priorities."Brown concedes the"fiscalization"of local deci- budget. Instead,the administration adopted its own piece- Sion making,which emphasizes shopping malls over hous- meal approach, allocating money for hospital adminism- Ing developments,is a serious issue.But he says critics of the Lion,public-safety funding,and had proposed to send$100 adminisuation's approach to ERAF tend to leave out the million in ERAF money back to counties. Even that $100 steady increase in state subventions to local government since Proposition 13 passed in 1978. the balls.But it remains to be seen whether such a plan can "It depends on where you set the starting point for the get pass the voters,especially if the project's most noticeable debate," says Brown. "Locals want to start it at 1990. We non-participant—the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association would argue it stars in 1978." —opposes it. WithpoliticalchanneisinSammmmappearingblocked. Why isn't the anti-tax group involved in the project' local government officials mayendup going a different mute Project director James Connor insists that the group was to get help—a route, ironically enough, that has waked invited. Joel Fox, president of IgTA, disagrees. "I don't against them historically.For the past three years an'mnpms- believe we were ever invited.At least we warms invited on sire coalition of interests—including the Building Industry the first go around,"says I=,who saw the oversight its a Association, California Chamber of Commerce, California snub of his organizstion's importance in the debate. Teachers Association,League of California Cities and CSAC Despite this nub in political protocol, H7JA's sideline —hasbeenworking tofomtulareaplanthatwouldoverhaul status does not mean that it is entirely opposed to helping the finance system for local governments. Known as the local governments. In fact Fox is quite sympathetic with California Govemance Consensus Project,the effort hopes to locals' concerns over ERAF, which HJCA has opposed all restmcmre things so that locals will have greater flexibility along.More Important, Fox says that he's willing to discuss and resources to meet the needs of their communities. a re minadon of the Proposition 13 provision that al- While no specific pmposal is on the table,ideas being lowed the stare to take control of pmpery tax revenues, bandied about include redirection of mete property tax which was a result of faulty drafting in the Initiative. revenues away schools,so that cities and counties can better lHowardJarvisl intended that the propery tax would be meet other needs, while backFilling the education budget dispersed by the counties," says Fox.The idea of weaning through others means, such as sales tax revenues. Such a schools of property tax revenue and giving more of It tolocal plan would certainly relleve locals of their reliance on sales governments is also something Fox stands behind."When I tax dollars—which Wall characterizes as a"less dependable served on the Constitutional Revision Commission I sug- revenue source." The problem for counties with sales tax gested that we ought to look at the suite taking over more of revenue,as Wag describes it,is that it often runs counter to the school funding and tbat more property tax stay with local their needs,especially during recessionary times.'When the governments." economy goes down, an does sales tax revenue,but that's All of this back-and-forth suggests that some room for when county services are most in need,"Wall explains. consensus does exist between the representatives of Propo- Those involved in the project say that they hope to have Sidon 13 and those of local government.But ultimately txdy their proposal ready for next years legislative session,and time will tell whether any serious reform—cod fiscal relief that if the Legislature fails to pass it,then they will put it on —comes about the cities and counties of California.a and a . Article from PROGRESS, Summer 1997, Volume B, Issue 3,Water Environment Research Foundation Project Profile: DEFINING BIosomS STABILITY TO BE AVAILABLE AT WEFTEC '97 e findings of a recently cam- shift in management strategies,gener- intended use.When selecting appro- pleted WERF research project, attars need to concentrate not only on pirate tests of stability,the process used Defining Binmlids St"ty,will production of biosolids but of the to manufacture the product,as well as be available at WEFTEC 97. In quality of the product.Key to the suc- its intended use,must be considered. preparing this study,the project team cessfnl use of any product is the pro- As an approach for bicsolids stabili- reviewed over 250 references dealing duction of a material of consistently ry assessment in this WERF project,a with the testing methods,mtena,and good gtraliry.Biosolids product quality matrix based cart use and technology approaches used for stability assess- can be assessed in terms of nutrient was developed.A table is presented in mmt of bioolids. In addition,the content,metals content,and the report to summarize current pear. current stability assessment is summa- pathogen density.Another important ticm Tests were recommended as the rized in this report for the major stabi. trait,and the focus of this WERF pro- mot useful methods of stability assess- Ibation technologies evaluated includ- jest,is stability. ment for each of the stabilization log composting,alkaline stabilisation, Biosolids used beneficially most technologies examined.The remm. heat drying,and digestion technolo- meet the minimum requirements of mended methods are well known and gies. The project team includes Dr. the EPA Part 503 regulations for documented in the litetature,but Michael Switrenbaum of the pathogen,vector attraction reduction, then is a need for standardisation of University of Massachusetts;Lynne H. and metals limits.However,biosolids protocols. Mass,Dr.Albert Pincince,and John can meet the Part 503 regulations, While there is an increasing recog- F.Donovan of Camp Dresser& and even be of exceptional quality, nitlon of the importance of stability McKee.Inc;and Dr.Eliot Epstein of and still not be marketable since the asasmrit for beneficial use of E&A Environmental Conwltants, regulations do not directly deal with bicsolids,there is a deficiency in the Inc- arability assessment.In order to have technology transfer,regulatory consid- The beneficial use of bicsolids has commercial value,bioolids must be etation,and practical use of stability transformed the historic view of physically,chemically,and biologically assessment.In the published report, processed wastewater treatment raid- stable during transportation,handling, the project team presents a list of uals. instead of wastes requiring dis- storage,and application. research still needed to facilitate p. ,il,these material—bi~lids—are Clarity is needed in defining the biosolids stability assessment now viewed as valuable manufactured term"stability"among the numerous products.Processes such as comport- researchers,practitioners,generators, By. Michael S.Swimenbaum ing,heat drying,and alkaline=bil'va- and regulators of bioolids stability Dept-of Civil& lion allow utilities to fans on the pro- assessment Stability assessment Environmmml Engineering duction of biosolids rather than the depends on the particular process used University of Massachusetts treatment of sludge.Along with this tomanufacnue the product and on its WERF Principal Investigator ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Lame Of Paper Section Page Date Subject O .C . Register Mefre I 9�IG �g7 SoLn+a AnA fle�;P-s W°t�r 17�sf. But Mesa — ila own bid I spurned by Santa Ana Heights— W�. FOCUS won't take no for an answer. So far,it has spent a quarter of a million dollars to stop the mar- riage. X 2 districts roan Mesa retained ranI - counsel,flied a lawsuit for special in- Inat than and secretly hired a pu6llorelallons firm to improve, immersed is image. Rea aasay they find acme M of ese's'e tactics even more ,in water maddening than the money it's spending. A memo penned by the public- relations firm was leaked to the battle public last week. The memo suggests: ►"Spinning the story to our pISPUTE' Mega and Ir- advantage" in the media. ►"Feeding"a positive story to vine Ranch are in a a small local paper to throw re- porters off the scent of another 8 Pe g y story that would have made Santa Ana Heights. Mesa look bad. ►Finding some Santa Ana By LORI BASHEDA Heights residents to write "let- The Orange County Register ters to the editor" in Mean's de- From Costa Mesa fens¢. The memo also suggests get- It might take Moses to part ting a favorable op-ed piece into these waters, the"Register or the Times"that Mesa Consolidated Water is strong but "not so strong that and Irvine Ranch Water We cannot convince someone in have spent a total of more the community such as Costa than half a million dollars in a Mesa Mayor Peter Buffs to sign tug of War to take over the Santa it." ' Ana HeVBbtoo Water District. Buffa couldn't be reached for The battle began in January comment. But it gives Costa when Santa Ana Heights an- Mesa City Manager Alan Raeder Fpounced it had hammered out a a good chuckle to think of them dea1.W merge with Irvine Ranch trying to pull one over on the Water District. In June, the mayor. tuerser went throuab. '. Others aren't laughing. "There's a lot of people who s are really ticked off about this," s Please see WAIEA Papa 6 11 METRO 6 The Orange County Rgster FROM PAGE 1 Saturday, Aug. 16, 1997 WATER: Mesa Consolidated Water District refuses to yield in fight FROM t "It's dicey for a public agency Heights officials if they wanted the customers. said Costa Mesa councilwoman to have a PR firm anyway be- to participate. According to "We won't win one dime from and Mesa customer Heather cause they're dealing with public Kemp, they said "yes." that lawsuit,"she said."All I win Sommers. dollars." So Mesa set about making its is a headache and I can't sleep at It came to light earlier this A few days ago, Adler Public reservoir 10 percent bigger to ac- nights." 7ieek that Mesa hired the public- Affairs, the firm Mesa hired, commodate them. And Santa Many ratepayers, however, relations firm behind closed quit, tiling a conflict of interest Ana Heights, he said, agreed to think it's time to back off. doors. Mesa didn't put it on the because of a new client they're pick up the $2.5 million tab for "The money they're spending agenda, put it out to bid, or tell picking up. the extras. is just ridiculous;' said Mesa ratepayers how much of their On Thursday,after much criti- "We never signed, but we sat customer Ed Guilmette. money they were spending, it cism,Mesa said it would not hire across the table and shook ]rvine Ranch officials say they was reported. another firm and revealed how hands," Kemp said. have spent more than $200,000 "Mesa should not be telling much they spent on Adler: $7,500 By the time the reservoir was their opponents (Irvine Ranch) for one month. finished in '96 though,Santa Ana defending themselves against what their war chest is;' said As a ratepayer,Sommers said Heights still had not paid its bill. Mesa, and the battle's not over Mesa attorney Art Kjdman in de-- -she feels cheated. The next thing Mesa knew, yet. tense of the hiring. "We don't "Why Mesa has pursued this Santa Ana Heights put itself on The injuhction that Mesa filed have to give them a front-row as vehemently as it has is beyond the auction block. in Orange County Superior Court seat into our strategies." me." Mesa officials believe they had was shot down in July. But the Sidman said hiring a public- To understand why Mesa is first rights to the district.That's lawsuit to stop the merger Is still telations firm Is part of Mesa's fighting so hard to win Santa Ana why, they say, they are fighting Pending. legal strategy. And public agen- Heights, officials there say, you so hard. They're just protecting "They're wasting thousands �ies, he said, are permitted to have to go back a few decades. their$2.5 million investment. and thousands of taxpayer dol- Iscuss legal strategies insecret. Since the '70s. Mesa has had faith." lars," said Santa Ana Heights .Mesa deal) in good f "I don't think so," said Tom contracts to provide water ser- said board director Trudy aith." resident Agnes Dubberly. "It's fJewton, counsel for the Califor- vice and customer service to the Ohlig- Hall."I went to Irvine Ranch and not just weird, it's irresponsF ma Newspaper Publishers Asso- tiny Santa Ana Heights district, said'Oh,come on,leave it alone. ble." ciation. "11's really quite bilari- which has 2,900 customers. Dubber) points out that a mo. bus." Mesa General Manager Karl Why do they want this district] oril y ' Newton said It appears Mesa Kemp said it was always Mesa a Give us a break.'" t Yomerss S voted this spring PP Y Canta Ana Heights cu to violated the Ralph M. Brown understanding that someday it Ohlig-Hall said she feels"very merge with Irvine Ranch,selling jpcf, would take over Santa Ana bad" about all the money Mesa their shares for$1,IOD each. The The act says that all meetings Heights. has spent.But they're doing it for people made lheirchoice. pfpublic bodies have to be oppen," "We've treated them as fam- "It's a done deal and they just he said. "The exception fs for By," he said. So when it came will not let go of it," said Irvine Pending litigation. Hiring a PR time in the early '90s for Mesa to Ranch spokeswoman Joyc4 firm has nothing to do with tinge- start building a reservoir for its Wegner-Gwidt. It It has everything to do with 22,000 customers,Kemp said,of- „ ublic image. ficlels naturally asked Santa Ana ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE e DATE �f S�UIBJECT Qoro' t C+'t0. community commentary Clearing up the myths of the Bolsa Chica project By Lucy Dunn Commission.California Coastal and are able to locate food over the funds east for projects other Conservancy and numerous very large areas,including the than the mesa.With the Boise other state and federal agen- preserved Boise Chive Clore Wetlands already in pub- In esponse to Marinka des,the cost of services to birds Wetlands,Huntington Mesa, tic ownership,the real need for Horack's letter of Aug.7, and wildlife will amount to Huntington Beach Central Park, additional government funding 1997,please note the myths appron- Seal Beach Naval Weapons is to cover the extra costs for and facts: mately S50 Station and Wildlife Preserve. restoration of the degraded Myth:This project will be a million for _ Huntington Beach wetlands and habitats in the wetlands,not the drain on city resources. the restom- F I numerous other large open purchase of some special inter- Fact:This beautiful new tion of the space areas within and outside est park land with no significant community for families and severely of Huntington Beach. habitat value,according to the nature will be built very soon, degraded Myth:Urban runoff from the state and federal wildlife agen- with or without the city.The city wetlands at tp houses on the mesa would send des. of Huntington Beach will pro- Hoke Chica. bias into the wetlands and As to purchase of the mesa, vide absolutely no services to Myth: spell doom to the quality of We the message sent to Washington this community,unless it wants Hundreds of in the water reserve. and Sacramento is dear:The to.B water,sewer,library and house cats Fact The Boise Clime wet- city of Huntington Beach does fire services are provided by the will prey on lands already receives urban not want to purchase the land city,it will be because the city the widen- Lucy Dom runoff from over 27 square itself because it does not want bas determured that it can fully gered birds miles of Orange County It to tax its own residents. recover its costs,plus perhaps living in the wetlands. receives when nmoff hoer Other Faeb:The new com- make a profit from providing a Fact:In reality,hundreds of Huntington Harbour,the munity on the mesa ned to the particular service. house cats already live around Landmark homes.Seaci ff and Boise Chica wetlands will be For example,according to the wetlands at Bolsa Chica. thousands of other neighbor- almost entirely single family the city's own gaff report,the The wetlands are completely hoods in Huntington Beach and homes and reflect the ben of proposed fire services alone surrounded by residential surrounding communities. the California coast.The archi- will result in a windfall of development vow.National The water quality will be tecture will reflect a new S700.000 annually to the city enwonmenul experts from vastly improved,according to American coastal village with coffers,B the dry approves an gate and federal resource agen- the state and federal wildlife five miles of new trails and agreement.B the city doesn't des and wetlands restoration agencies,once a tidal inlet con- paths,a New England-style n not provide services, the home- expert`studying this site under- nect ig the Pacific Ocea with commons in a 17-acre commu- owners in the new mesa com- stand that restoration of the the wetlands,is restored.in pity park. munity,who will be paying degraded habitats at Bolsa 1899,there used to be a natwal The park will contain a net- uxes to the county,will have Chica is the most important tidal connection that kept the ural amphitheater area over- theu services delivered by the goal toward protecting endan- wetlands pristine.It's line to looking the wetlands where county or other alternatives gered bird species.The agen- restore it.The wildlife agemes families can picnic.fly a kite. Kell can never force the city to des are working to achieve that are planning to do so. bird watch or throw a Frisbee. provide services,nor would we goal now. Myth:The federal Land and The community park will show. want to. Myth:Hawks,falcons,kites, Water Conservation Fund has a case opportunities for youth Myth:Birds and wildlfe do eagles and other buds of prey S13 billion surplus and can be activities.The will be a new not requ re 'swrvires.' would disappear 19 the mesa used to pwrLase the mesa community proud to provide for Fact A=rdmg to the U.S. were devehoped). Fact There is no surplus in both famines and nature. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fact According to the state any federal account.The feder- Departmenl of Fish and Game, and federal wildlife experts, al government has already ear- .ILLY WhIR is the senior vice California Stale Inds these buds are not endangered marked every dollar of what tit- president of Koll Real Esute Group. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE DATE SUBJECT SEAL BEACH The City tiundl this week ap proved an agreement with Cypress to jointly buy sew- er-inspection video equip- ment Splitting the estimat- ed$30,000 cost evenly,the cities are going to buy used - specialized video equipment designed to help inspect the caverns and pipes of their municipal sewer systems and storm drains for block- ages or needed repairs. Seal Beach's current system is antiquated and getting hard- er to repair and operate,ac- cording to City Engineer - and Public Works Director Stephen G. Badum. Includ- ed in the deal are special cameras,remote-control systems,computer equip- ment and a van with radio equipment.The Cypress City Council approved the deal July 14. —Ansonia A.Bade ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Date Subject 19 T l;7.0-5 6 Z 8/iG Two Contaminated Bay Channels Closed Two Newport Bay channels will remain closed Indefinitely to swimming and water sports be- cause of contamination, county officials said F7iday. The 33rd Street channel, be- tween 33rd and 37th streets, and the Rhine channel from Lido Park Drive to 20th,were found to have unhealthful levels of bacteria. Officials have yet to pinpoint the problem, but they suspect that runoff from city streets is the culprit. A routine sampling Aug. 7 discovered that pathogen indira- tore were too high, Larry W. Honeybourne,program chief for the county's Environmental Health Division,said. The slice are not particularly Popular to swimmers and divers, but they are with boaters, who sometimes jump in the water to clean their crafts or to swim. Those who swim in contand- nated water can suffer a host of health problems, from ear and nose infection to gastrointestinal disease,particularly if the water is ingested,Honeybourne said Also suit closed to water sports for similar reasons are several portions of Huntington Harbour, Including Peter's Landing and Mother's Beach. The county provides a 24-hour hotline on beach closures. Information:(714)667-3752. —3OHN CANALIS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS IName of Paper Section Page I Dat Subject Le-,5A Tm % ilPf Environmentalists Push Toxin-Free Paper The TCF bills sponmr, Rep. Scuba Times, which sells for ■ Pollution: Congress Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), end Im�g2.99,prints about 70,000 copies six Wlndes. wood consumption about 10%over supporters, Including Greenpeace,- times a year end averages 106 Few U.S.paper companies,how- the process allowed by the pro- urged to phase out the Natural Resources Defense pages.Garth publishes two smeller ever,are willing to pay the higher posed EPA rule. Greenpeace's Council,National Wildlife Feelers- magazines, Deep Tech, on ad- cost an only about 10%of the mlll's Floegel disputed his claims. - chlorine bleaches that use Uon and Sierra Club, face strong vaned diving techniques,and Be- output la TCF bleached pulp, The EPA proposal would bar dioxins, but industry says opposition from the paper industry. lize Magazine,an in-country pubh. Windes said. The rest Is un. chlorine but allow mills to use WIN the Congress we've got cation for the Central American bleached chlorine dioxide, a compound of benefits Of cleaner method . right now,the climate doesn't seem nation. - "The Europeans dealt with the chlorine and oxygen. Agency offl- lo be very encouraging;' Greerel ' oe we on a heavier paper chlorine Issue far quicker," said daises It would cut dioxin re- peace worth added cost. ce kesman Mmk Floe el I Archie Beaton, executive director y of sPo g +Il stock and some of Nate just being leeees by fp%. sold a federal developed now in were Just look- of the Chlorine Free Products By BILL KACLOR The federal Environmental Pro- Ingof at converting Nose," Garth not a ai Algonquin, III. "They're I gent props rejected a more prin- assninreo eases tmUon Agency,meanwhile,Is con- said not afraid to spend money on new gent proposal to add another prac. er ENSACOLA, Fla.—Ae an sldering a new rule that would', Several other magazines now are technologies. . .and do something eea called oxygen delignificallon— ENSACOLA,lfst, puh s an reduce,but not eliminate,chlorine-�using TCF paper. Harcourt Brea for the environment" being Installed at Champion's Pen- Fred Garth found himself related toxins. prints childrens books on It and sacole mill—which reduces the protesting against pollution caused Garth, 40, grew up In Gaines- Klnka Inc.,the copying chain;has /�ermany Is 100% totally chle- amount of bleaching chemicals by making the very type of paper vlae, Ga., and vacationed on been offering it since 1992. Urine-tree and Sweden about named. used to print his scuba diving Perdido Bay, just west of Penes- But TCF remains a tiny fraction 60%.Beaton said. magazine. cola,since childhood His magazine of the market because of high cost The American Forest and Paper 1 was In kind of a hypocritical now is headquartered on Perdido and low availability, says Steve Assn., based In Washington, op- situation,"he admits. Key,a barrier Island bordering the Doughty, paper manager for Pub. poses any TCF requirement. That, however, changed two bay, Ushers Printing Co. In Shepherds. "The impact on air and water years ago when Scab, Times be. He U a member of the Perdido ville, Ky.. where Scuba Times Is quality is still uncertain," said came the first general circulation Bay Environmental Assn., which printed. He Bald TCF paper costs spokesman Berry Poloky. 'R mn't magazine In North America has been praeuring Champion up to 4% more than ordinary be recycled as many times and printed on totally chlorine-tree International Corp. to stop using paper. you're going to have to cut more (TCF)paper. chlorine at Its Pensacola pulp and Only one of 105 U.S. bleached uses to produce it." Garth and other environmental- paper mill, which discharges into pulp mills Is totally chlorine-free. Poloky said hydrogen permdde ism now we pushing Congress to the bay. The Louldena-PaelHe mill In Sa- bleaching would Increase pulp. pees legislation that would phase "I became a person that was ma,CaIIL,was hydrogen peroxide out all chlorine bleaching own- fighting against the paper company for bleaching. It costs more but co pounds from paper making. that was polluting my frontyard, does not produce dangerous poau- Chlorinemakespaperwhitebut but at the same than In my business tents also creates several types of toxin I was buying paper that was chlo- Unlike corrosive chlorine effiu- Including dioxins, a family of rine-bleached;'Garth old."I don't eel, It can be reused, reducing chemicals linked to cancer and like to be a hypocrite,so I looked water consumption, said LOOM- neurological, Immune, reproduc- for a way to find a totally chlorine- ena-Paelflc spokesman Bill tive and developmental problems. freeaheet." The poisons are released Into At firer, he was unable to find- streams, rivers and other waters coaled paper for high-quality color from male that make pulp for final reproduction Garth began using - writing and printing paper. Other unmated TCF paper for a IS-page types of paper such ae newsprint black-and-white'section in 1592. tissues and cardboards ere pro- The entire magazine went totally duced without chlorine com- chlorine-free In June 1995 on pounds. mated Paper Imported from Ger- many. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS SU NAME OF PAPER I SECTION PAGE DATE BJECT Merrill Asks Reversal on Grand jury ■Bankruptcy:Bror :' - -The pml mlel for a a 1111flei of continues battle against ;Lmmesanes=settlement was media attumeys seeking aided ublt lovafaw:=w � M between Merrill Lynch and the release of testimony. 0-mac cmmtye®male Thal ema- .ImY ern only be exercised if the By GBOI'PBOUaEER -" .. gram materials are released." Tons... Merelll Lynch paid $30 million SANTA ANA—Attorneys for .,List mmfh In a'settlement UW MenIll Lynch a:Caereeoomugg endedthegrandlmyebveoiga- theirbattlebkeep,eve[theM ., ttonmdylwtweekehmorelts turn Pagea of a grand Jury mtlmany .wm'to eryhe In big demon, abort Ne brokerage's role m the .Carer caned the deal ",sanely Orange County banteupgy: .:unmudandauspect — to brands Bled with the 4th ale- Kean L Sager,the lead memory trim Cmut of Appear In Sever Am, representing the media compemes atmneye for the Well Street giant., pushing for release of the doeu. bane,eked that a Superior Court -mco e, also mftiolsed del. Any.. Judge's order to publicly release MichmIR.CaplalfmhdfaBmem no..," W the tectlmpay be pmmlly obey 0lrleto order. overturned, - ' .jai fr`'.'The district atmrney's office Judge David 0. Carter,'who "delayed producing my materials oversees the felony,mimlml resale for more Ilan atr home," giving in Orange County and the grand MerrWlyachlawyentimemeee, tury that Investigated Merrill ' the temporary my from the ap- Lyneh."haa taken the etramil- peals Must,Sager wrom to Capp mry and heretofore'unpree. .an Tuesday. relented step of . .:.ordering the -Capfml could cat be reached for immeeiem release W Bernet grand Mermen, but his chief moment, Jury testimony.".Mmrla.ettmmye -Maury Liam denied Nathts WBu vaned . ..... ..r-.-..:---�-.,lane the release of my tun- That Thursday order was .rats. blocked later the same day.when :.::"We can't pass a.magic Wood, Merrill attmnoyo get a temporary,_ om 14" �B said,adding that stay hem Neappeale Musk '.:, ,,..,the caber m sum and distribute Atooem,a reprvaevmg a gmW',,the v.lumMm. rented, wen of meta mgaWeamvq techl "-underway wbm the slay sae or. The Timm,have argued that =dare. ' r... . la,nothing g emus law thktprohtb-SG..The disarm atbrney,has wanted tied Carter tram arderlog fbe�the documents to he made public grand Jury testimony b be made -.al along.M mv,nerd ben Forest- Public _„ r,a"- lore determined that elate law Countering Martha r.yvco'e decided Net the transcripts Ye- - atanM an the matlar,'the cacao- -Mlb eL etmneye curly,her dmingoisal dud there duly q'Ay sbound in W Advise Me IerNl. wood) li¢te] ov erwhelming public Interest to wbLLthm ld.4adihmk whW We vide nggfmmamn so the e e .:ding,"herald vide d responsibility m the carom' pe • isms submitted a the of ands disastrous, aegaty for, [hang- appeals Must ponces w arty,the Court➢'e disastrous]99f bank- distric0more orrmoeye that lee do n. >.—Caner ter should be mahipu the daeu- - �M"Moreover, the emiesec has'e-:'.metre letter domes that the - mrtn8 gtpetweitsty of the g hict nunnery, the. ;• The Imam gnome him the and . de b forest, aimlml Pea- hearsay'bound of faces gnreach- mmor, of Merry Lynch and its Ivghtsdemomn. employees is eahanga fen a$10- - The letter Wen miles main payment—a Significant CarteYe belle(that Nerve W the PON=of which is to be pmdoo the dteaneats wa snow the pubacm dlmldalmroeyeOM-'=,"hie beau uvdmoand what came the meth.. eyeemdh1h bneL [local skis ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE HATE SUBJECT A �t<s F5 l a -zs -I .��P�1 T I(S t Water Importation: BB R MONDAY,AUGUST 25.1997 Tide to Keep Rising -- -- - oRAN( Public works:job Coumy Water District."Uwe had isa major=quake that shuts the growth,development to California Aqueduct down for six raise overall demand 30% months or had a major drought. = a what would we do?" - by 2020,Orange County Most of the cities in northern Water District and central Orange County get ^' . ' projects. y p 50% to 70% of thew water from Rate increases likely. the ground and import the rest. --_ But South County has far less By SHELBY GRAD ground water and thus must rely Truss srAFF water: more heavily on importation. -. Taal water agenoes hope to . Orange County's reliance on reduce thew reliance on imported expensive imported water is ex- water by drilling dozens of new petted to increase significantly wells, at a cost of more than over the nest 20 years,raising the $30 million.They are also corind- - prospect of higher bills for con- ering much more expensive plans sumers and prompting officials to to build a new water reclamation tyx,-. f seek new sources of less-costly plant and make a variety of _ JOW ground water. improvements to the countys Job growth and new residential waterworks. developments across the county All this comes at the height of a semaranmr.caar/to"w�^»Q should increase overall water de- bitter water war between San A reflection is Cast in treated waste water during a clarification prat mend by 30% by Z020.according Diego County and the Meuopoh- ass at an Orange County Water Distnct plant in Fountain Valle to new estimates by the Orange tan Water District, which sup- County Water District plies Southern California—and But because local water sup- Orange County—with much of its plies are limited.the district pre- imported water. diets that use of imported water San Diego wants to reduce its from the Colorado River,North- reliance on the MWD by pur- eM California and elsewhere will chasing water from Imperial jump by at least 37% over the County. MWD opposes the plan. same period saying that B San Diego buys less These projections trouble some from the MWD,and consequently officials, who note that imported begins paying less of the pumping water casts twice as much as and other transmission costs. it tapping local supplies and is a less will result in higher water Mies dependable a source. for other MWD customers m "It goes beyond cost to a ques- Southern California, including uon of reliability;'said Wes Ban- those in Orange County. Mister, president of the Orange Pl.Bee WATER 86 ­h�; not Yet come up w th WATER estimates how water Wars will " - change over the neat ID yeas.But Continued from HI - officials have expressed concerns The MWD is also under pressure about a proposal by the MWD that from the federal government to would increase ware charges to reduce the amount of water it takes areas like Orange County that are from the Colorado River,a devel- experiencing growth in water de- opment that might reduce the According to Orange County amount of water available to Water District report, the cast of Orange County. imported water from the MWD "We are cam to increase for any o r weor. -. - of local lye ran water,"siRonald use of local ground, general cal ma age Ro the could rise ae much at 3t re The Ir Irvine general manager t the MWD would use the extra revenue �--� Irvine Ranch Water new wells m pay for infrastructure to accommodate improve- • which Is during three new wells men l needed m accommodate re- this year alone. "8Y its nature. glonalgrowtR Of ground water is very reliable. It's But MWD officials insist that there m times of drought" they haven't decided how to apply The projected surge in demand so-called "new demand charges" (,1 over the nest BI yearn comes otter and that customers probably won't water use in Orange County actu m sharp- ail bills. y dropped by nearly 10%earlierincreases to Heir water _ in the decade. Officials attributed. 'T don't think you wr see that to the dip to the drought and eco- 'kind o[impecton waterrates;'said �p C nomic recession of the early 1990s. d `� But since 1993, water use is up �m Thomas. amistapt chief of o R Planning and momerces for the Z C. 18%, and the Orange County Wa- MWD. "Our 10-year forecast ter District predicts a fuller 30% ahowe that rates should remain Increase by 2020 because of new 'prettyfiat" m growth Thomas, however, said that. mCnC To meet the rising demand, Orange County residents might northern and central county water take a modest hit if San Diego — agencies plan to increase ground County is successful in receiving water production from 70% of water from Imperial County and IJ O capacity today to 75%by 2020.The reduces the amount it pays to the ✓— m m U effort will require more than two MWD. m dozen new wells,and experts slit anent sure if the goal can be met A verage monthly residential _It's still a question whether we Awatev bills range from less can pump that much water out of than $14 in .Irvine and Garden r = the basin." said William R. MMsJr. Grove to mare than $35 in some Co general manger of the Orange. South County communities such as. 'D — County Water that du "Our first Legere Beach and Trabuco Can- Butweindicat w are that this n doable. yen,according to a 1996 survey by Hutwe wW havemweit and see." BMpk&Veatch 1 4 Even with the costs of the new Anaheim's average monthly we.- CD U wells and other Improvements, ter bit is$21.87,while Santa Ana's 1 Mills said ground water pumping is$18.21 By contrast,Ins Angeles will still cost far leas than imports- bills average $24.69 a month, ton or other options, such w Riverside $10.90 and San Diego y desalinization ofo mwater. $24 In 2000.the Orange County Wa- The push to reduce reliance on ter District estimates that an acre- imported water is also driven by feet of ground water will rrost E182, more than concern about cost U compared with at least "N for Remington Beach's water de- imported water and more than partment is just completing a$43- $1200 for desalindzed water. An million waterworks upgrade that acre-foot Is 324,000 gallons, adds three wells and millions of enough to supply the needs of two gallons of extra Merv=capacity. families for a year. Linde Daily,a senior analyst with Officials also hope to bolster the city,said the additional reser- local water supplies by building a voir should give the city a decant new reclamation facility that supply of water in case wells and would treat waste water. Some of pipes are damaged during an the recycled- water would be earthquake. pumped into the Santa Ana River "We could have a situation in ae part of a recharging process which we will have to live with designed to increase the county's whatis within ourreach;'she said ground watersupply ae river water filters down through the riverbed and holding ponds into the aquifer. The fist phase of this reclamation project would rost about$240 and. lion. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE DATE SUBJECT Water Thrift Plan for State Unveiled ■ Resources: Complex proposal would have agencies cooperate to cut Colorado River use. Neighboring states say California is still unfair and tall the idea a'fairy tale.' By TONY PERRY of the Interim Bruce Babbitt carries urea amen WRITER through on his threat to reduce California's use of Colorado River SAN DIEGO—The atstes top waterbymorethin20%. 1 Water official Monday unveiled an "It's either this or 20 years of Intricate plan for Southern Cabfm- litigation." Kennedy said during a ma to survive with significantly less break in the meeting of the Colo- water from the Colorado River In mdo River Board of California case the federal government makes Babbitt's top water consultant,a good on a threatened cutback. professor at the University of Cali- But the plan would require un. forniae Bull Hall School of law, pt'ecedented cooperation between expressed optimism, albeit cau- wamng water agencies and acqui- Lowly, that an agreement can be escence from neighboring states reached on a list of divisive tesues. whose anger over Southern call- "There have been big steps fornia's lavleh water use has been taken but there are still a lot of rising. blanks," said Joseph L. Sax "As And neither that intrastate m. you know,there is a long hiemry of operation nor mneremle acquits- non-progress on these issues." Bence was bnmediately evident. Southern California's three larg- "California wants to continue te eat agricultural water districts—m enjoy free water."said Pat Mulmy, the Coachella, Palo Verde (Blythe general manager of the Ias Vegas- area) and Imperial valleya—con- based Southern Nevada Water tine to meet weekly with Kennedy. Authority. the Metropolitan Water District and As unveiled by David Kennedy, other interested parties, but pros. director of the mate Department of rus on key points has been slaw. Water Re eurces, the so-called "Sometimes l leave the meetings 'California Plan contained blanks and I feel good," said Tom Levy,- where crucial numbers about water general manager of the Coachella; usage and mop acreage should be. Valley Water District. "Other What's more, a key portlon of times l leave and feel suicidal." the plan, storing surplus water in Kennedy said he hoped to have a, Lake Mead, was immediately op- proposal ready within two momhe; posed by representatives from As he has outlined it,the California Colorado.Nevada and Arizona who Plan includes San Diego Countl had been invited to attend the buying water from the water-rleb meeting of California water agen- Imperial Valley,and officials in the' am that draw on the Colorado Imperial,Palo Verde and Coachella River. The Arizona representative valleys agreeing to cap the number called the toes "a fairy tale" that of acres being irrigated with Colo-, will never happen. races River water. Kennedy, an appointee of Gov. The crucial numbers—how; Pete Wilson,is attempting m cobble much water San Diego will buy,, together a plan to keep the mate how much San Diego will pay the from tieing unprepared If Secretary Please see WATER,Aft, e W/�TT, several states.fake Mead is run by New Mexico have pressured the A jj the federal government, which federal government to min inCall- would have to approve the banking fornla's draw from the Colorado Continued from A8 idea River, which supplies 70% of MWD to have the water sent to The Arizona, Colorado and Ne- Southern California's water. Ban Diego via the district's aque. vada officials said Kennedy's plan last year, California took 18% duct, and the acreage limit to be for conservation and sharing does more than its allocated share, imposed on the three agricultural not go far enough. They cam- largely because Babbitt declared districts—are still under negotia. plained that it does nothing to that Arizona and Nevada had un- tion. prepare for years in which the used surplualaBocadons. But Nose Another key part of Kennedy's Colorado River dips so that not states are rapidly approaching the plan would be an agreement among even the assured allocations—in day when they will need their Southern California agencies to California's case. 4.4 million acre- entire allocations, leaving Callfor- stop complauunB to the federal feet—can be counted on. ma with a shortfall. government that their neighboring "What 1 nee is an effort by That 18%c represents 800,000 agency a waffling water. California to continue w use 4.4 acre-feet, enough to satiety the Coachella, for example,bas long million for an indefinite period of needs of 1.6 million fam0ies for a complained that the Imperial Irri- tine" even in low years,said Rita year—hence the pressure on Call- gation Dstnct, the largest water Pearson,director of Arizona's Wa- forms and its regional agencies to user in Southern California and the ter Resources Department 'That find a way to survive with less largest agricultural irrigation dis- is simply unfair." through conservation and sharing. Viet in the muntry, is notoriously California for years has been To provide even greater incen- wasteful. exceeding Its Colorado River allo. five for California to change its "If we're going to have peace," cation and has known that It could water-using ways, Babbitt said Kennedy said. "we're going to not continue to do m indefinitely. that he would lice to see a plan have to start by not having any The urgency to develop a wrier- from California even before Ne- sideskirmishes." "don plan springs from a tough vada and Arizona begin needing Said Levy,"He wants to cut my speech last December by Babbitt, their entire allocations. tongue out." in which the former Arizona gov- Without such a plan, Babbitt Kennedy's plan calla for storing error bluntly stated that California said, he would be disinclined to surplus water in Lake Mead, the had been living wide and wet on declare the unused portion of Ne- behemoth reservoir behind Hoover other people's water for tin long. vada and Arizona's allocations to Dam. That is particularly impor- In a speech to officials from the be surplus, thus leading to an trot to the MWD,water wholesaler seven Western states that drew immediate and drastic cutback for to 16 million people in Southern from the Colorado River, Babbitt Southern Califmmia. California, because it would allow said California could no longer Sax, who assisted Babbitt in the mega-agency to "bank" water count on tilting more water each writing the speech, said the two- for years in which the Colorado year from the Colorado River than month time frame mentioned by River flow is diminished it is guaranteed under a decades- Kennedy seems appropriate for Other states, however, oppose old agreement between the stales getting a plan to the Interior chief. such a move for fear it would turn and the federal government. In two=nibs Rabbit would just be Lake Mead into a reservoir for Officials in Arizona, Nevada, deciding whether surpluses exist California and not a facility for Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and for 1998. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DIS I RIC18 NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Date Subject LA /11 e 2 8/)919 UPDATE . ......__...................._.................... FOLLOW-UP ON SHE NEWS MANE Board OKs Discharge of water Into Bay The State Water Resources Control Board has upheld a decision that will allow Irvine Bench Water District to discharge reclaimed water Into the Upper Newport Bay. But Irvine Banch,under a agreement with Newport Beach and the Orange County Water District,will not discharge reclaimed water into the bay for at leastanotheryear. The district was granted permission by the Regional Water Quality board last summer to discharge treated water during winter months.The district said the discharge would not harm the bay's ecosystem. The decision from the State Water Resources Control Board came after an environmental group. Defend the Bay,appealed the Regional Water Quality board's approval UHANGE CUUN FY SANITATION DISTRICTS , n N NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS �J meat Pap( �LEI _ r Section M/7; 5 $ Sub led Consolidated Drops Legal Action COSTA MESA—Saying they A hearing on the request Is were spending too much on legal scheduled for Wednesday. fees, Mesa Consolidated Water In January,Irvine Ranch offered District b,mrd members have de to- cided to drop legal action fighting a pay E1'stake a share Sant., buy a merger between Sant:- Ana Heights. slake in Santa Ana Heights Water Co. and Irvine Heights. Ranch Water District, Mesa Consolidated maintains it The directors, In an emergency should take over Santa Ana meeting last week,said they would Heights' operations because the Instead wait for the Loral Agency two companies have worked Formation Commission to make a closely together. ruling on the merger. Both Irvine Mesa Consolidated also has con- Ranch and Mesa Consolidated have tended the merger is illegal be- asked LAFCO to decide the appro. cause the Santa Ana Heights by- priate agency to take over Santa laws prevent the sale of shares Ana Heights. given to landowners in the area. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Na"of Paper Section Page Dale Subject 1 19kir Two water agencies sued by workers' association The Orange County Register The joint employee association for two water-reclamation agen- cies is taking its bosses to court, alleging that the agencies violat- ed contract agreements by lay- ing off four employees and changing workers' pay sched- ules. In a complaint filed with the Santa Ana Superior Court last month,the Aliso Water Manage- ment Agency/South East Region- al Reclamation Authority Em- ployee Association also alleged that its employers breached agreements by eliminating six positions that should be governed by collective bargaining. Contracts between the associa- tion and the agencies expired last month, but renewal negotia- Lions have been going on since October. Attorneys for the em; ployees said that until negotia,, tions end—either in a new con- tract or in an impasse — the agencies are not legally allowed to enact the kinds of changee they made to pay or staff. David Caretto,general manag at of the agencies and one of the named respondents in the suit' said the changes were legal.The issue is expected to be reviewed by a Santa Ana Superior Court judge Sept 25. Total Maximum Daily Loads sible for ensuring that the terms of the agreement are carried out. EPA sources say the wulement is significant for several reasons.First,the deal lays out a solid negotiating : . Position fw the agency in furore Settlement talks in other states or in discussions aimed at avoiding litigation alto- f gether."We have staked out our general position here,"an agency source says,"it is an aggressive timeframe,but it is also realistic...it's really a compromise position."Furthermore,the deal meshes with the agency's recently issued TMDL policy which Sets a new standard for state TMDL programs.Finally,agency sources say the deal also signals the agency's success in getting some environmentalists to understand its position that tight deadlines could force the- agency to develop weak TMDLs and would not be in the best interest of the environment.The litigants seem to understand now"that faster isn't necessarily better,"one source says. Environmentalists are also applauding the deal,saying that the state and EPA have made a strong commitment to improving water quality in Georgia.Although environmentalists had originally fought for a much tighter deadline,one source says that the new deal ensures that TMDLs"will be done right"and will bring about needed improvements in waterquality. State and agency sources say there appears to be a growing trend to amicably Settle these TMDL suits.To date,the agency has Settled 1 I cases and predicts that more agreements are on the way.One state source hopes that legal challenges to TMDL programs may now begin to taper off as environmentalists we that EPA and states are taking positive steps to get their TMDL programs in order. Responding to massive fishkills EPA FUNDS MAJOR RESEARCH EFFORTS ON DEADLY WATERBORNE ORGANISM Following massive fWikills in North Carolina and Maryland,EPA and other federal agencies are funding major research projects on Pfiesteria,the predatory microorganism suspected to be the cause of the problem. Pfiesteria—whom first appearance in the United States was in small populations about 10 years ago—surfaced again in North Carolina several months ago,and is suspected of killing hundreds of thousands of fish in the Tar- Pamlico and Neum Rivers Basins,two coastal watersheds.Now,state and federal regulators believe Pfiesteria also is responsible for the recent death of 10,000 fish and Several beach closings in the Chesapeake Bay. In response to growing concerns about the microorganism, EPA's Office of Research and Development issued a$500,000 grant in June to a North Carolina scientist who has been studying Pfiesteria since 1989. In addition,EPA's Office of Water and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have each set aside S250,000 for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to study the problem,pending the state's issuance of a research plan.According to Maryland state officials,their project will entail increasing water quality monitoring in the Chesapeake during wet weather events and working with area chicken farmers to assess their management of nutrients,which are applied to the land as crop fertilizers.Excess nutrient pollution is suspected of increasing Pfiesteria levels.But an EPA official says more research is needed before nutrients can be defini- tively termed a catalyst for Pfiesteria. According to a North Carolina scientist,whose recent work has focused on profiling how Pfiesteria kills fish,the microorganism attacks fish by secreting a series of toxins.One of the toxins is a Flesh-stripping substance that muses lesions and another is a naurotoxin that paralyzes fish and eventually stops their breathing.This source says laboratory experiments where these toxins have been purified kill fish in two to three seconds. Under more realistic water quality conditions it takes about 15 minutes for fish to die,this source says. A Water Office official says the Maryland research effort is likely to include water quality monitoring and sediment sampling and"will complement,but not duplicate"the North Carolina research.Maryland researchers could not be reached for comment. There is some dispute about whether Pfiesteria poses a human health risk A North Carolina Division of Environmental Management official says several press reports have exaggerated what is currently known about the human health effects of Pfiesteria."The truth is that Pfiesteria may not necessarily be causing"lesions and rashes among some fisherman."Thee symptoms have a lot of causes.For example,rashes orlesions can also be attributed to sea nettles."This some says the state is reluctant to cause a public panic over a muse-effect scenario that lacks conclusive proof. But the North Carolina Scientist says that"Pfiesteria and its health implications for humans should be taken very seriously."This source believes short-tent or long-term exposure to Pfiesteria muses significant human health problems.A research assistant,who spent about an hour a day with Pfiesteria specimens in a quarantined,bio-hazard 6 WATER POLICY REPORT-August 20,1997 Toxics lab setting,became sick and collapsed after five of six weeks on the assignment.In addition,the scientist,who has endured chronic exposure to Pfiesteria aerosols,claims to have recently endured frequrnt bouts of pneumonia and bronchitis.This source notes that the microorganism reduces fish white blood cells,which also fight infections in humans,to about 20 percent their normal level."There may also be immunological effects that are hard to distinguish at first,"the scientist says. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University have agreed to look into anecdotal evidence of human health effects from Pftesteria. TASK FORCE, PERCIASEPE WILL DISCUSS EFFLUENT GUIDELINES 'ALTERNATIVES' Members of EPA's Effluent Guidelines Task Force will meet with Assistant Administrator for Water Robert Perciasepe on September 10 to discuss"alternatives"for establishing future effluent guidelines,according to a wastewater treatment official. According to the source,the meeting will provide an opportunity for task force members to discuss with Perciasepe many of the task force's alternative approaches.Earlier this summer,the task force wrote Perciasepe and Associate Administrator for Reinvention Chuck Fox.The]une 23 letter raised the task force's concerns that its recommendations to EPA were not receiving serious consideration(Water Polly Report,July 9,p3).Besides discuss- ing future alternatives,task force members also plan to discuss EPA's response to the task force's past recommends- Lions,according to the wastewater source.The source also suggests that EPA may be planning a"pilot project"similar to one recommended by the task force.EPA has had some internal discussions following the June 23 lemer,this source adds. EPA officials could not be reached for comment EPA ISSUES FLEXIBLE POLICY FOR STATE SOURCE WATER PROTECTION PROGRAMS EPA is providing states with significant flexibility to individually tailor their source water protection programs under recently finalized guidelines that are intended to assist states grappling with regional source water concerns. The new guidance is earning support from several state officials who claim that EPA has responded in their concerns that a draft policy was too restrictive and contained unrealistic program deadlines. The Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 made source water protection a national statutory priority for the fast time.The am requires EPA to develop guidance on source water assessmrns,which delineate the boundaries of the areas providing source water to public water systems and identify the origins of regulated and unregulated contaminants within these boundaries.These assessments will then be used to help state and local officials develop voluntary protection Programs. In new guidelines issued this week,EPA sets a goal:that"bylhe year 2005,60 percent of the population served by �I community water systems will receive their water from systems with source water protection programs in place under II both wellhead protection and watershed protection programs."EPA's new guidelines offer states broad discretion and incentives to help meet this ambitious goal. Under the new national program,states are required to submit source water assessment programs to EPA by the end of 1998.After a state's program is approved by EPA,states will then have two years to complete assess- merits for all public water systems.States,however,have argued that completing all these assessments within two years will hinder their ability to conduct the types of comprehensive assessments that are needed to initiate strong protection programs in the fume.EPA now agrees,and as a result,the agency notes that it will likely grant states an additional 18 months to complete assessments if needed. The new guidance also sets national standards for what information needs to be included in a state's assessment program in order to earn EPA approval.For example,EPA says that a su re's submittal must include inventories of significant sources of contamination and assessments on the potential threat of contamination to public water systems. But the agency also provides states with some discretion to determine what types of potential sources of comsmination should be considered significant and,thus,must be listed in a state's plan. Additionally,EPA clearly lays out a number of other requirements which need to be included in the program,but WATER POLICY REPORT-August 20,19,97 7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on o , 19P , was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on C,. 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this_Zday of •�Dfk. , 199"/. Penny Kyle, c/r/ � ry of each of the Boards of Di ctbfs of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California BWowVF77A ® COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING AUGUST 27, 1997 KICiS Of0992 5Q �9 00 G Z 1 J a olF��N�E ENS\P�N� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 08/27/97 Page 2 of 7 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on August 27, 1997, at 7:30 p.m., - in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT X Pat McGui an Chair Thomas E. Lutz NO.1 X James M. Fe man Chair ro Ism Arthur Perry X I Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz X I Thomas R. Saharelli I Jim Potts Todd Spitzer I X I William G.Steiner DISTRICT X Norman Z. Eckenrode Chair Michael L.Maertzweiter NO. 2 X Mark A. Murphy,Chair pro tem Joanne Coontz A Steve Anderson John Holmberg X John Collins James Petrikin X Barry Denes Bob Bell X Burnie Dunlap Marly Simonoff X Mark Le es Bruce A. Broadwater X Pal McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz Chris Norby X Don Bankhead Todd S itzer X William G.Steiner X Hank Wedaa 1 1 Mark Schwin X I Bob Zemel Tom Dal DISTRICT X Mamie L. Rice Chair James V.Evans NO.3 X Eva Miner-Bradford, Chair pro tem Paul F.Walker A Steve Anderson John Holmberg X George Brown Gwen Forsythe X Tom Carroll Mary Ann Jones X Brian Donahue Harry M. Dotson X Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff X Mark Le es Bruce A.Broadwater X Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller X at McGui an Thomas E. Lutz Chris Norby X Don Bankhead Todd Spitzer X William G. Steiner X Dave Sullivan Tom Harman X Charles E.Sylvia Alice B.Jempsa X Bob Zemel Tom Dal DISTRICT X Jan Deba Chair John E. Noyes NO.S John E. No es Chair ro tem X Jan Deba X I William G.Steiner I I Todd Spitzer DISTRICT I X I James M. Ferryman, Chair Arthur Peffv NO.6 1 X I William G.Steiner Chair pro tern li li Todd Spitzer X I Jan Debay I I Tom W.Thomson Minutes for Joint Board Meeting OSf27197 Page 3 of 7 ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT X Thomas R. Sahareltl,Chair Jim Potts NO.7 Christina Shea Chair protem X Barry Hammond X Jan Debay Tom W.Thomson X James M. Ferrymian Arthur Perry X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X William G.Steiner Todd Spitzer DISTRICT Shide Dettloff.Chair X Tom Harman NO.11 X Dave Sullivan, Chairpro tern I Tom Harman X I Todd Spitzer I William G.Steiner DISTRICT X Burnie Dunlap,Chair Marty Simonoff NO.13 1 X I Mark Schwing,Chair pro lem Hank Wedaa X I Mark A.Murphy I Joanne Coontz X I William G.Steiner I Todd Spitzer X I Bob Zemel I Tom Dal DISTRICT Christina Shea,Chair X Barry Hammond NO.14 1 X I Thomas R. Saharoili,Chair pro tern I Jim Potts X I Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X I William G. Steiner I Todd Spitzer X I Peer A. Swan I Darryl Miller STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don F. McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Christopher D. Dahl; Mark Kawamoto; John Linder, David A. Ludwin; Bob Ooten; Mike Petennan; Gary Streed; Mahin Talebi; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy Wheatley; Ryal Wheeler, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Mary Lee; Phil Stone REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair reported that Director Peer Swan addressed the Orange County Council of Governments' General Assembly on August 21. He also recognized Director Jan Debay who gave a brief report on the CASA Conference and strongly urged the District Chairs to attend at least one conference for the educational benefit Director Collins also recognized Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, who reported that the U.S. EPA has deemed the Districts' Source Control program as the best in the United States. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 08/27/97 Page 4 of 7 APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts) A motion was made, seconded and carded to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held July 30, 1997, as amended. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS (All Districts) MOTION: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits"A", "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS O6/11/97 06/25/97 07/09/97 Joint Operating Fund $867,353.30 $776,271.71 $2,377,316.20 Capital Outlay Revolving fund 2,434,124.01 446,441.28 3,603,262.09 Joint Working Capital Fund 195,794.42 517,886.00 399,088.05 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 24,032.97 27,919.24 - 7,203.44 District No. 1 253.80 9,818.18 357.40 District No. 2 76,719.29 31,687.15 15,400.40 District No. 3 33,118.42 293,950.90 15,987.51 District No. 5 2,671.68 8,255.07 4,790.81 District No. 6 1,323.93 6,195.81 148.20 District No. 7 3,885.38 10,206.57 14,444.05 District No. 11 5,088.30 77,066.10 113,705.87 District No. 13 0.00 239.52 0.00 District No. 14 0.00 1,869.92 0.00 Districts Nos. 3& 11 0.00 0.00 25,790.00 Districts Nos. 5& 6 4,327.43 473.56 5,387.92 Districts Nos. 6& 7 1,904.83 216.49 1,901.67 Districts Nos. 7& 14 3,856.22 828.58 4,381.99 TOTALS 3.654.453.96 2.209.326.08 6.589.165.60 Director Mark Leyes abstained. DISTRICT NO. 7 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE: The Engineering Department requests approval of an agreement that provides reimbursement by District No. 7 to the County of Orange, Public Facilities and Resources Department, for the cost of adjusting approximately 12 existing District No. 7 manholes within several County of Orange streets in unincorporated areas in District 7 in conjunction with the County's "Resurfacing Program 1996-97." MOTION: Moved, seconded and carded to approve a reimbursement agreement with the County of Orange authorizing District No. 7 to deposit the sum of$2,340.00 with the County of Orange as the estimated cost for adjustment of approximately twelve District No. 7 manholes in several County of Orange streets. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 08/27/97 Page 5 of 7 DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the August 27, 1997 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 30, 1997 to be filed. . DRAFT PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the August 7, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held August 7, 1997 to be filed. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS.J-34-1 AND P2-35-5 WITH ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. FOR OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND PHASE II SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing for six items of added work. (PDC97-38) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Change Order No. 2 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and 132-35-5 with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for an addition of$50,415, increasing the total contract amount to$7,168,938. ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORK(All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of selection of Black and Veatch for preliminary engineering and environmental work in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project. (PDC97-40) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1.Approve selection of Black and Veatch to provide Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Work for the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $449,500 as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 29, 1997. The Districts' share is $224,750 or fifty percent of the total fee of$449,500 in accordance with the Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated February 26, 1997. Director Mark Leyes abstained. ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of a Task Order with Adler Public Affairs for public information services in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project. (PDC97-41) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve selection of Adler Public Affairs to provide public information services in support of the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $99,796, as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 22, 1997. The Districts' share Minutes for Joint Board Meeting a 08/27/97 Page 6 of 7 is $49,598, or fifty percent of the total fee of$99,796, in accordance with the Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated February 26, 1997. AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATETIC PLAN MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by the Director George Brown, Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan re the August 13, 1997 meeting. The Chair then ordered the Minutes for the meetings held on March 25, June 18, and August 13, 1997 to be filed. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1997 (All Districts) A motion was made, seconded and carried to receive and file this information-only item. JOB NO. J-31-3, PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to add instrumentation and equipment to automate processes at the Plant No. 1 Headworks, and provide additional capability to monitor process information from a remote location. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2)Waive bid irregularities as to forth; and 3)Authorize award of a contract for Job No. J-31-3, Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, to Systems Integrated for a total amount of$694,000. JOB NO. P2-46-2. RECLAIMED WATER EXTENSION TO HEADWORKS 'C"AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to extend the reclaimed water piping to Headworks "C"for improved reliability of water supply for the main sewage pumps. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 2) Authorize award of a contract for Job No. P2-46-2, Reclaimed Water Extension to Headworks "C"at Plant No. 2, to Atlas Allied, Inc. for a total amount of$139,680. DISTRICT 3 CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 3: The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. to replace a portion and increase the capacity of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System in Imperial Highway between Beach and Harbor Boulevards in the City of La Habra. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2)Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the plans and specifications; and 3) Authorize award of a contract to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38-3 in the total amount of$4,587,000.00. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting O8127/97 Page 7 of 7 DISTRICTS 7& 14 ACCOMMODATION OF FLOWS AND TRANSFER OF CONNECTION FEES AGREEMENT BETWEEN IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD) AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 7 ANa14: The Engineering Department requests approval of an agreement that provides for the accommodation of flows from two small drainage areas in District No. 7 which are currendy served by District No. 14 through IRWD. Under this agreement District No. 7 will transfer to District 14 connection fees previously collected by the City of Newport Beach on behalf of District No. 7. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1.Approve Accommodation of Flows and Transfer of Connection Fees Agreement with IRWD and Districts Nos. 7 and 14. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (All Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at 8:11 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with Califomia Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action taken will be publicly recorded at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Item No. 19(a)(3). No actions were taken re Agenda Item Nos. 19(a)(1) and (2). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 8:30 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Secretary of a Board of Directors of County Sam tion Dis 'cts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13& 14 \Vead`dataZ\ .dlaWdminSSW IN97V782797.dm FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O6/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159365 A&D PARTY RENTAL $238.30 LEGISLATORS DAY RENTALS 159366 ADS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $13,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159367 AMAIKEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $9.442.00 TRAINING REGISTRATIONS 159368 ROMA SALES COMPANY INC. $35.600.00 FUEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 159369 ASTI)(AM SOC FOR TRNG&DVLPT) 5229.00 MEMBERSHIP 159370 ASTD PUBLISHING SERVICE $150.00 PUBLICATION 159371 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,961.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159372 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $1.54 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159373 AT&T-PRO WATTS $299.51 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159374 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $843.3D LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159375 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $25.58 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159376 AWSI $1,839.41 D.O.T.TRAINING PROGRAM 159377 ACOPIAN CORP $803.40 POWER SUPPLY 159378 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC $411.843.60 CONSTRUCTION J34-1,P2355 159379 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $37,332.90 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89 159380 ALADDIN HOUSE $3,500.00 VERTICAL BLINDS % 159351 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $417.42 FANS Fes.. 159382 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $6.19D.75 MECHANICAL PARTS 159383 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $310.00 VIEDO TAPE-CLEAN WATER ACT 159384 AMERICAN SIGMA $10,736.95 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES y 159385 AMSA/KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $425.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION �! 159386 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $307.40 REIMBURSE EXPENSES 159387 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $872.78 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 159388 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. $628.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 159389 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $120.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 159390 BANANA BLUEPRINT $3,239.65 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 159391 BAR TECH TELECOM,INC. $557.00 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION 159392 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5811.13 BATTERIES 159393 BELL PIPE&SUPPLY CO $257.01 COUPLER 159394 BERENDSEN FLUID POWER $30.74 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 159395 910-GRO DIVISION $69.757.33 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26.95 159396 BLACK BOX CORP 52,162A0 FIBER OPTIC CONVERTER 159397 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $150.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 159398 BORLAND INTERNATIONAL $1.095.76 COMPUTER PARTS 159399 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $660.64 GENERATORS 159400 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.085.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1.12-94 159401 BNI BOOKS $316.06 BOOKS 159402 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $1,638.63 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 159403 CS COMPANY $4,775.64 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159404 CALIF WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOC. $93.88 SOFTWARE 159405 CALIF MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL $59.00 SUBSCRIPTION 159406 CALTROL,INC. $956.04 HARDWARE 15N07 CALOLYMPIC GLOVE&SAFETY $2.579.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159408 CATAPULT $2.720.00 ON-SITE TRAINING 159409 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $10,448.33 OFFICE FURNITURE 159410 CHAPMAN COUNSELING $7,285.D0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - dT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O6II/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159411 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $11.271.29 INSPECTION SERVICES 159412 CLOSSON&CLOSSON $1.060.50 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 159413 COAST RUBBER STAMP $92.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159414 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $281.09 LAB SUPPLIES 159415 COMPPLUS $2,730.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159416 COMPUCOM SYSTEMS $3.359.22 COMPUTER PARTS 159417 COMPUSA,INC. $651.72 COMPUTER SOFTWARE IS9418 COMPUSERVE $922.36 COMPUTER SERVICES 159419 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $17.81 TRUCK PARTS 159420 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3.277.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 159421 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $1,010.13 FREIGHT 159422 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO $425.04 CRANE RENTAL 159423 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $7.998.88 ENGINE PARTS 159424 COPELCO CAPITAL $1,432.00 COLOR COPIER LEASE ISN25 CORE LABORATORIES,INC. $800.00 LAB SUPPLIES 159426 CORPORATE EXPRESS $409.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES S 15W27 CORNELL MARITIME PRESS& $24.95 PUBLICATION p% 159428 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $235.68 TRUCK PARTS 159429 COASTAL CONSERVANCY $18.00 SUBSCRIPTION n Y 159430 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,254.43 ELECTRIC PARTS I 159431 COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER $738.49 VIDEO 159432 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS $11.050.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 159433 WILBUR C.CRIDLEBAUGH $10.05 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 159434 CSUS FOUNDATION $107.75 PUBLICATIONS 159435 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $848.00 VERIFICATION&MANIFEST FEES 159436 CA WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOC. $195.00 ADVERTISEMENT 159437 DWG ASSOCIATES $1,980.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15943E THE DARTNELL CORP $82.05 SUBSCRIPTION 159439 DAVE'S BICYCLES.INC. $143.89 BIKE REPAIRS 159440 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $377.65 TRUCK PARTS 159"1 DELL MARKETING L.P. $9,004.67 COMPUTERS 159442 DENNY'S RESTAURANT#136 $75.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159443 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $3,248.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 159444 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $1.065.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 159445 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC $21,104.00 EXCESS WORKERS'COMPENSATION INSURANCE 159446 MARC DUBOIS $206.18 PIS TRAINING EXPENSE REIMS. 159447 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $663.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 159448 ENS RESOURCES INC $928.93 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159449 EDISON RAC $1,280.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 15945D EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $352.63 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159451 EMPLOYER ADVISORY COUNCIL $80.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 159452 ENCHANTER,INC. $2,100.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 159453 DARRELL ENNIS 5250.00 CASH ADVANCE 159454 FAIRBANKS SCALES INC $240.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159455 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $82.12 AIR FREIGHT 159456 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $12.632.36 FILTERS FUNDNO 9/99 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 06/09/97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06111/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159457 FIRST CHOICE $379.39 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 159458 BAILEY FISCHER&PORTER CO $097.13 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 159459 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $118.53 LAB SUPPLIES 159460 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $323.14 PHOTO SUPPLIES 169461 CRY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,552.40 WATER USE 159462 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $800.00 PERMIT FEE 159463 THE FOXBORO CO. $2,982.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159464 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $7,422.80 OFFICE PRODUCTIVITY SUPPLIES 159465 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $140.02 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 159466 CITY OF FULLERTON $138.01 WATER USE 159467 DISf,INC. $11.786.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159468 GANAHL LUMBER CO. 586.06 LUMBERMARDWARE 159469 GARTNER GROUP $95.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 169470 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $620.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 159471 GENERAL PETROLEUM $8.563.10 UNLEADED GASOLINE 159472 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,210.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES �. 159473 GIGA INFORMATION GROUP $6.000.00 RESEARCH SERVICES S 159474 GOLDENWEST WINDOWS $2.543.00 STEAM CLEANING OF BUILDINGS 159475 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $85.00 PUBLICATION 159476 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2.131.30 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES > 159477 GRASSY S.T.I. $1.583.11 ENGINE PARTS w 159478 GRAYBAR $72.26 ELECTRICAL PARTS 159479 DGA CONSULTANTS $2,955.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.641-94 159480 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $1,131.37 PRINTING 159481 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $652211 TRUCK PARTS 159482 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $594.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159483 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $2,093.93 TRUCK PARTS 159484 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1.871.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 159485 PL HAWN CO,INC. $233.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159486 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.003.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 159487 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $595.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 159488 HILT],INC. $127.19 TOOLS 159489 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $3.575.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES 159490 HOME DEPOT $1.299.36 SMALL HARDWARE 159491 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,343.39 WATER USE 159492 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO $1,265.77 FINAL USER RECONCILIATION REFUND 159493 IBM $324.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 15M" IPCO SAFETY $4,406.38 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159495 ISCO,INC. $5,392.03 INSTRUMENT 159496 ISI INFORTEXT $856.61 SUBSCRIPTION 159497 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $19.04 CONNECTORS 159498 INTELLIGENCE PRESS,INC. $887.00 SUBSCRIPTION 159499 IRVNE PHOTO GRAPHICS $13.43 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 159500 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $54.54 WATER USE 159501 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $495.65 PRINTING 159502 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $339.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 06/09N7 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O6/11N7 POSTING DATE O6/11N7 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159503 JENDHAM INC $676.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159504 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $2,115.67 GAUGE 159505 JENSEN TOOLS,INC. $66.84 OFFICE EOUIPMENT 159506 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $202.39 TRUCK REPAIRS 159507 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $10968 ELECTRIC PARTS 159508 TERRI JOSWAY $2,039.51 EXPENSE REIMB. 159509 KAHL SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS $1,091.76 SCALES 159510 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $154.345.10 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95 159511 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $32.40 MACHINE SUPPLIES 159512 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $773.98 TOOLS 159513 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,259.66 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 159514 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $60.25 CHEMICALS 159515 LAKEWOOD PUBLICATIONS $78.00 SUBSCRIPTION 159516 LASERALL CORP. $103.00 PRINTER REPAIR 159517 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $2,771.98 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 1�p 159518 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $43,479.26 ENGINEERING SERVICES 11 159519 LEOS,OAMATO,BRISBOIS $453.64 LEGAL SERVICES 169520 N.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $13,879.52 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90 d 159521 MPS $80.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES a 159522 MST FASTPRO $558.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES y 159523 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT c 159524 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $871.82 WELDING SUPPLIES 159525 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $9,000.00 REMOVE&REPLACE MANHOLES 159526 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $488,433.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36.2 159527 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $287.157.10 CONSTRUCTION PIAI,P143 159528 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $177,970.00 CONSTRUCTION P140.2(REBID),P2♦7-2(REBID) 159529 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $152.64 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159530 MASUNE COMPANY $1.120.45 FIRST AID KITS 159531 MCJUNKIN CORP $285.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159532 MCMASTERCARR SUPPLY CO $71.42 TOOLS 159533 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING T4.960.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 159534 MILLIPORE CORP. $176.00 LAB SUPPLIES 169535 MILLTRONICS $166.20 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159536 MISSION INDUSTRIES $5,973.57 UNIFORM RENTALS 159537 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $637.00 INSTRUMENT 159538 MONITOR LABS $465.71 INSTRUMENT 159539 MOTOROLA,INC. 54,W9.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159540 JAMES MULLINS $329.49 EXPENSE REIMS. 169541 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP $219.42 TRAINING VIDEO 159542 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $875.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159543 NETWORK CATALYST,INC $24.422.59 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 159544 NEW ENGLAND WATER ENV.ASSOC. $5.00 PUBLICATION 159545 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $360.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 159546 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,398.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159547 THE OHMART CORP $262.26 TRAINING VIDEO 159548 ORACLE CORPORATION $8.474.64 SOFTWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID M/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159549 ORACLE CORPORATION $3.636.00 SOFTWARE 159550 ORANGE COAST PIPE SUPPLY $183.77 PIPE SUPPLIES 159551 ORANGE COUNTY COMPENSATION $35.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 159552 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR&EXPO CTR $75.00 EXHIBIT SPACE FEE 159553 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $878.99 CHEMICALS 159554 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,869.52 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159555 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $238.41 FITTINGS 1595% OXYGEN SERVICE $1.778.05 SPECIALTY GASES 159557 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4,650.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 159558 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $28,658.00 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93 159559 PBAS $16.00 AUDIO TRAINING TAPE 159560 PSI $116.97 HARDWARE 159561 PACIFIC PARTS&CONTROLS,INC. $20,385.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159562 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $4,392.43 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159563 PACIFIC BELL $53.88 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159564 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $333.81 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159565 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $187.D9 TIRES µ 159566 PARTS UNLIMITED $40.93 TRUCK PARTS µ 159567 R.F.PAULUS.INC $71.298.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-7A ^ 159568 PENN WILSON,GNG $100.697.98 CNG FUELING STATION MO 1/24196 9 159569 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $446.76 REIMS.PETTY CASH �n 159570 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $170,544.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.2945 159571 PITNEY BOWES $4,417.75 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 159572 US FILTEWPOLYMETRICS INC $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 159573 POLYPURE,INC. $46,045.12 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 159574 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $24.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159575 POWER SYSTEMS $29.11 SPRING 159576 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $98.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 159577 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $3,857.00 SOILS TESTING 159578 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $1,589.41 PUMP PARTS 159579 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $687.31 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 159580 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $478.25 LAB SUPPLIES 159581 RANCHO AUTO WASH $378.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 159582 REALTIME $2,386.00 INTEGRATION&SUPPORT SERVICES 159583 RED WING SHOES $241.37 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 159584 BOLT DELIVERY $103.00 FREIGHT 159585 THE REGISTER S452.80 NOTICES&ADS 159586 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $200.00 OCEAN MONITORING 159587 REMEDYTEMP $27,425.86 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 159588 RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL $15.00 PUBLICATION 159589 SARNOFF DEPOSITION SERVICE,INC $392.00 DEPOSITION SERVICES 159590 SAVANT AUDIO VISUAL $359.60 PUBLICATION 159591 SCHWIND AMERICA,INC. $572.D6 PUMP PARTS 159592 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $31,142.54 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.64L94 159593 SCIENTIFIC REFRIGERATION $160.00 SERVICE CALL 159594 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $478.33 SPECIALTY GASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0B MW97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE O6/11197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159595 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $75.90 WATER USE 159596 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $360.04 WATER USE 159597 SEARS ROEBUCK &CO $213.57 MICROWAVE 159598 SECOND-SUN $471.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159599 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.999.53 TOOLS 159600 SIEMON,LARSEN&MARSH $3.740.00 LEGAL SERVICES 159601 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $725.00 LAB SUPPLIES 159602 $KILL PATH SEMINARS $198.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 159603 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $180.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159604 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1.841.36 TOOLS 159605 SO CALIF AIC DISTRIBUTORS $102.36 PUBLICATION 159606 SO CALIF EDISON CO $50,072.46 POWER 159607 STAMINET INC $3,847.77 PRINTERS 159608 STANDARD SUPP&EQUIP CO INC $135.25 OVERHAUL KIT 159609 STEVEN ENTERPRISES $663.52 REPAIR 159610 STREET SMART $2.664.45 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT % 159611 SUCCESSORIES $570.63 FRAMES r 159612 SUMMIT STEEL $9,746.86 METAL v' 159813 SUNSET FORD $2,326.85 TRUCK PARTS n 159514 SUPELCO,INC. $1,081.02 LAB SUPPLIES Y 159815 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $41.24 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 1 159818 SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS $175.00 SUBSCRIPTION 159617 SUPERIOR PLATING $458.89 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 159518 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $740,570.40 CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3,PI-3B-5,P246,P2-55 159619 TPC TRAINING SYSTEMS $249.91 TRAINING SOFTWARE 159520 THOMAS SCIENTIFIC $189.84 IMAGING CHAMBER 159621 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $3.377.75 MECHANICAL PARTS 159622 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 159623 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $358.53 LOCKS&KEYS 159624 TORNELL&COTTEN $916.00 LEGAL SERVICES 159625 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $3.208.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159626 TRADE SERVICE CORP $1,925.28 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 159627 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $450.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 159528 TROPTTONE FURNITURE $670.00 REFUND 159629 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $169.39 TRUCK PARTS 159630 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $20.55 TRUCK PARTS 159631 TRUESDAIL LABS $1.007.00 LAB SERVICES 159632 JIG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2.173.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159633 TOLE RANCH/MAGAN FARMS $86.377.87 RESIDUALS REMOVAL 159634 DANIEL TUNNICUFF $1.249.39 EXPENSE REIMB. 159635 TURBINE SPECIALTIES INC $13.413.58 TURBINE MAINTENANCE 15%36 TUTHILL CORPORATION $216.14 TURBINE SUPPLIES 159537 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $63.68 PARCEL SERVICES 159638 VWR SCIENTIFIC $13,733.78 LAB SUPPLIES 159639 VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO.INC. $88.75 LABSUPPLIES 159640 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $533.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/11197 POSTING DATE 0611 U97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159641 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $2,864.10 VALVE 159642 VARKEL CONSTRUCTION INC. $27,076.50 CONSTRUCTION J-11-2 159643 VERTEX BUSINESS INTERIORS $318.82 OFFICE FURNITURE 159644 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $1,078.95 FIBER OPTICS 159645 WACKENHUT CORP. $8.955.88 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 159646 WATERS CORPORATION $624.58 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159647 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY $354.69 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159648 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $946.55 WIND SOC SUPPLIES 159649 WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE $63.00 SUBSCRIPTION 159650 WESTERN MEDICAL CENTER $502.12 RECONCILIATION REFUND 159651 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $35,541.611 CAUSTIC SODA MO B-23.95 159852 WHATMAN $502.06 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 15%53 WILLARD MARKING DEVICES INC. $40.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159554 WITEG $667.57 LAB SUPPLIES 159655 XEROX CORP. $3,955.55 COPIER LEASES 159656 YALEICHASE MATERIAL HANDLING $664.86 YOKE ASSEMBLY c 159657 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $582.49 LAB SUPPLIES F� 159658 ZEE SERVICE CO $466.02 FIRSTAID KITS C TOTAL CLAIMS PAID OfiH 1197 $3.654.453.98 9 J SUMMARY AMOUNT •1 OPER FUND $253.80 02 OPER FUND $5.298.01 i2 CAP FAC FUND $71,421.28 f3 OPER FUND $29,417.33 t3 CAP FAC FUND $3.701.09 f5 OPER FUND S2,671.68 16 OPER FUND $1,323.93 97 OPER FUND 53.885.38 #11 OPER FUND $5,058.12 #11 CAP FAC FUND $20.18 •586 OPER FUND 54,276A2 $586 CAP FAC FUND $50.61 $667 OPER FUND $1.904.83 t7614 OPER FUND $3.856.22 JT OPER FUND $867.353.30 CORF $2.434.124.01 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $24.032.97 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $195,794A2 $3,654,453.98 FUND NO 9199 - .R DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0621/97 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O6125197 POSTING DATE O6125/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159578 AMS(ACOUSTICAL MAIL SERV) $37.50 OFFICE PANEL 159679 ARMA INTERNATIONAL $320.00 PUBLICATIONS 159680 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $7.82 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159581 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $26.42 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159682 AT&T-CELLULARCR&R $4.06 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159683 ADVANCED WORKPLACE STRATEGIES,INC. $99.00 D.O.T.TRAINING PROGRAM 159684 AWWA $43.00 PUBLICATIONS 159685 ACADEMIC PRESS $19.95 PUBLICATIONS 159685 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1.232.52 SPECIALTY GASSES 159687 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18.666.45 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9-89 159688 ALLIED PACKING&RUBBER INC $9,285.78 VALVE PARTS 159689 ALPHA RESEARCH GROUP $9.320.00 ON-SITE TRAINING 159690 AMERICAN COMPENSATION ASSOC $155.00 MEMBERSHIP 159591 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $935.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159692 ASSOC.OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES $425.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 159693 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $790.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159694 APEX COMMUNICATONS $2,058.02 EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION I+ 159695 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $6,818.24 NOTICES&ADS w 159696 ADS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $5,907.32 COMPUTER SOFTWARE ^ 159697 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES $393.99 PUMP PARTS 159698 ARRONA INSTRUMENT $1,538.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES �. 159699 AWARDS&TROPHIES $15.73 PLAQUES 159700 BALLANTYNE COMPUTER SERVICE $550.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 159701 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $995.35 ROPE 159702 BAR TECH TELECOM,INC. $650,00 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION 159703 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $2,540.55 BATTERIES 159704 BELL PIPE&SUPPLY $299.29 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159705 810-GRO DIVISION $39.344.88 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 426.95 159706 BLACK&VEATCH $557.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146 159707 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $1,801.00 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 159708 CEM CORPORATION $562.50 LAB SUPPLIES 159709 CH2M HILL $20,198.68 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 159710 CPI-THEALTERNATIVE $284.46 LAB SUPPLIES 159711 CRG MARINE LAB $4.625.00 OCEAN MONITORING 159712 CS COMPANY $428.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159713 CALTROL,INC. $290.93 HARDWARE 159714 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $325.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT 169715 CALIF SEA GRANT COLLEGE SYS $24.00 PUBLICATIONS 159716 CAMALI CORP. $1.300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159717 CAMALI CORP. $2.175.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159718 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEE INC $24.692.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 159719 CANUS CORPORATION $2.425.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 159720 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $3.220.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 159721 CLA-VAL COMPANY $128.96 VALVE REPAIR 159722 CLOSSON&CLOSSON $330.00 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT " 159723 COUCH&SONS $61,262.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O621/97 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0625/97 POSTING DATE 0625I97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159724 JOHN COLLINS $76.18 EXPENSE REIMS. 159725 JAMES E.COLSTON $139.51 EXPENSE REIMS. 159726 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $8,328.70 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159727 COMMUNITYACTIONIEAP $950.00 DISTRICT EAP-JUNE 97 159728 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $3,943.19 PUMP PARTS 159729 CONFIDENTIAL MGMT SERVICES $8,D45.20 INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES 159730 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $8,296.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 159731 COPELCO CAPITAL $1.432.00 COLOR COPIER LEASE 159732 CORE LABORATORIES,INC. $800.00 LAB SUPPLIES 159733 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $118.39 TRUCK PARTS 159734 COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER $209.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 159735 CRANE PRO SERVICES $1.985.00 CRANE PARTS 159736 CA&THE WORLD OCEAN 97 $110.00 PUBLICATION 159737 DAILY PILOT $38.50 NOTICES&ADS 159738 DAY-TIMERS,INC. $31.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES % 159739 DELL MARKETING L.P. $63,506.81 COMPUTERS 159740 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $3,076.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 159741 DETECTOR ELECTRONICS $76.45 LAMP 159742 DIAMOND H RECOGNITION $169.67 SERVICE AWARDS 159743 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $20.943.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 159744 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $28.19 PAINT SUPPLIES N 159745 ENS RESOURCES INC $1,169.04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159746 EDINGER MEDICAL GROUP INC $609.00 WORKERS COMP 159747 J.D.EDWARDS $27,580.75 SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES M07-24-96 159748 LINDA EISMAN $443.50 EXPENSE REIMS. 159749 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $2.537.51 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 159750 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK 54,115.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING 159751 ENCHANTER,INC. $2.100.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 159752 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,030.36 LAB SERVICES 159753 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $144.21 AIR FREIGHT 159754 FIBERTRON $2,562.94 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 159755 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $797.07 FILTERS 159756 BAILEY FISCHER&PORTER $1,878.05 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 159757 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,278.59 LAB SUPPLIES 159758 FLO-SYSTEMS INC. $9,577.30 PUMP PARTS 159759 FOLSOM LAKE FORD $31,348.30 TRUCKS 159760 FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $1,730.80 OILABSORBANT 159761 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $105.40 PHOTO SUPPLIES 159762 FRANKLINQUESTCO. $217.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159763 FRAZEE PAINT&WALLCOVERING $200.42 PAINT 159764 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $204.58 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 159765 GST,INC. $1.995.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159766 GARRATT.CALIAHAN COMPANY $1.640.83 CHEMICALS 159767 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5.527.86 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159768 GETINDE-CASTLE $502.02 VALVE 159769 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $28.579.26 PUMP PARTS FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0521W PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0W5197 POSTING DATE 0626197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159770 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT $2.064.36 WORKBENCH 159M VAN GRAINGER PARTS OPER $155.80 FAN 159772 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $668.59 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 159773 GRASSYS.T.I. $1,518.67 ENGINE PARTS 159774 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $735.15 PRINTING 159775 DGA CONSULTANTS $4.355.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.641-94 159776 HACH COMPANY $1,718.52 LAB SUPPLIES 159M KEVIN MADDEN $301.78 EXPENSE REIMB. 159778 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $5,426.70 TRUCK PARTS 159779 PL HAWN CO,INC. $1,157.60 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159780 JAMES D.HERBERG $184.25 EXPENSE REIMB. 159781 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE $81.89 TRUCK PARTS 159782 HOLMES S NARVER,INC. $8,215.38 ENGINEERING SERVICES 159783 HOME DEPOT $150.60 SMALL HARDWARE 159784 HYATT DIE CASTING $519.00 NON COMPLIANCE USER REFUND 159785 IBM $324.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159786 IPCO SAFETY $3,826.42 SAFETY SUPPLIES r 159787 IMAGING PLUS $1.593.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES µ 159788 ITA, INC-TOSHIBA ACCESSORIES $527.95 BATTERY PACKS ^ 159789 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $358.26 CONNECTORS m 159790 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $2,427.92 BATTERIES w 159791 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $48.82 WATER USE 159792 ISCO,INC. $232.74 INSTRUMENT 159793 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $1,328.56 PRINTING 159794 JH RECOGNITION CO. $356.48 SERVICE AWARD PINS 159795 JAMISON ENGINEERING $6,920.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 159796 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,415.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159797 JAYS CATERING $916.64 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 159798 JOBS AVAILABLE $170.00 NOTICES&ADS 159799 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $858.51 MACHINE SUPPLIES 159800 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,918.60 TOOLS 159801 LABSYSTEMS $5,100.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 159802 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC. $118.17 LAB SUPPLIES 159W3 LANTRONIX $2,656.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159804 LASHER AUTO CENTER $13,299.76 TRUCK 159805 LAWICRANGAL,INC. $270.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13.94 1595DO LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $4.478.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 15007 LEXIS-NEXIS $264.50 SUBSCRIPTION 159BOB K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $10,894.57 r ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90 159809 LOS ANGELES TIMES $176.80 SUBSCRIPTION 159810 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. $6400.00 OCEAN MONITORING 159811 MPS $11.86 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 159812 MSA $1,594.13 SENSOR 159813 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $529.48 WELDING SUPPLIES 159614 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $1,397.23 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159815 LESLIE MARELL,ATTORNEYMW $300.00 ON-SITE TRAINING FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O6/21/97 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0625/97 POSTING DATE 0625197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159816 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $11.85 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159817 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $532.23 PHONE S EXPENSE REIMB. 159818 MWUNKIN CORP $512.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159819 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $3,190.76 TOOLS 159820 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $940.48 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159821 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $596.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159822 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $6,688.76 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 159823 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $117.27 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159824 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $603.40 OFFICE TRAILER LEASE 159825 MONITOR LASS,INC. $1.591.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159826 MONTGOMERY WATSON $13,000.00 AIR TOXICS PROJECT M.O.12-12-90 159827 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. $2.880.17 PUMP PARTS 159828 MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC $213.00 MEMBERSHIP 159829 NABISCO $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159830 NATIONAL ENVIRO.INFO.SERV. $61.00 PUBLICATION 159831 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $4,/43.04 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 159832 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER $986.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159833 NAT WEST MARKETS $70,445.97 COP INTEREST DRAW FEES H a' 159634 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $661.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES n 159835 NETWORK CATALYST,INC $43,567.16 COMPUTER SUPPLIES y 159536 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS,INC. $2,597.00 SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES 159837 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $19,829.72 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 159838 NORTHWEST NATIONAL LIFE $18,710.71 DISTRICT LTD B STD-JUNE 97 159839 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $1,025.13 SAFETY GLASSES 159840 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,490.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159941 OFFICE PAVILIONSIINTERIOR RESOURCES $859.46 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 159842 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $1,032.22 CHEMICALS 159843 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $4,261.88 FITTINGS 159844 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,844.93 SPECIALTY GASES 159845 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4,740.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 159946 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $41,705.40 GAP WATER USE M.O.6.9-93 159847 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $403.50 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159848 PACIFIC PARTS&CONTROLS,INC. $3,452.44 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159849 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $5.95 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159850 PACIFIC BELL $1,310.06 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159851 PAGENET $657.03 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 159852 PARKER SUPPLY CO $1,239.14 FLOW INDICATOR 159853 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1.151.71 TIRES 159854 KIM C.PATTON $1,208.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159855 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $143.47 LAB SUPPLIES 159856 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $2,217.53 REIMB.PETTY CASH 159857 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $171.431.94 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 159BSB PINNACLE MICRO $1.032.05 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 159859 POLYPURE,INC. $44,443.70 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 159860 POSTMASTER $172.00 PO BOX RENTAL 159861 POWER DESIGN $4,849.35 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE D60197 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0825197 POSTING DATE 0625197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159862 POWER MAINTENANCE INTER,INC $912.00 BATTERY REPAIR 159863 MIKE PRUCH 8 SONS $249.606.00 CONSTRUCTION 3-35R-1 159864 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $228.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159865 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $184.66 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159866 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $308.44 PUMP PARTS 159867 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $66.10 ELECTRIC PARTS 159868 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $4,170.65 TRASH REMOVAL 159869 RANCHO AUTO WASH $360.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 159870 RAND MATERIALS HANDLING $91.09 FREIGHT 159871 REALTIME $191.25 INTEGRATION 8 SUPPORT SERVICES 159872 BOLT DELIVERY $99.00 FREIGHT 159873 RELIABLE POWER METERS $100.00 SOFTWARE UPGRADE 159874 REMEDYTEMP $23,749.41 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 159875 RUSH ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES $6,925.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159876 SFICINAT ASSOC METAL FINISH $500.00 PUBLICATION 159877 SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY $181000.00 TIN-TDS STUDY 159878 SKC WEST $1,710.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES w 159879 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $1,850.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES v 159880 SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN $160.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION n 159881 SCHWING AMERICA.INC. $82.02 PUMP PARTS pl 159882 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $86,021.28 OCEAN MONITORING M.O."-94 159883 STEVEN ANDREWS ENGINEERING $2,830.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES U 159894 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,353.75 SPECIALTY GASES 159885 SEWER EQUIP CO OF FLORIDA $215.74 HOSE 159886 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $250.00 TOOLS 159887 SHASTA ELECTRIC $94,243.40 CONSTRUCTION J-31-2 RETENTION RELEASE 159888 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $1,578.69 TRUCK PARTS 159889 JEFF SHUBIK $403.70 EXPENSE REIMS. 159590 SHURELUCK SALES $5,636.16 TOOLSBUIRDWARE 159891 LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD SILBER $450.00 LEGAL SERVICES 159892 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $199.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 159893 SOUTH COAST SEA FODDS INC. $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159894 SOUTH COAST WATER $195.00 LAB SUPPLIES 159895 SOUTHERN CALIF COASTAL WATER $300,000.00 MEMBERSHIP 159896 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $20,446.12 NATURAL GAS 159897 80.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $880.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 159898 SOUTHERN STEEL BREA CENTER $75.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159899 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,047.22 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 159900 SPRINT $31.20 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159901 SUMMIT STEEL $1,901.11 METAL 159902 SUPELCO,INC. $470.81 LAB SUPPLIES 159903 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $157.67 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 159904 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $6,818.41 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES 159905 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $867.59 MECHANICAL PARTS 1599M TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL $2.450.57 PRINTER SUPPLIES 159907 TONY'S LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $218.80 LOCKS 8 KEYS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0621/97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0525W POSTING DATE O6/25197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159908 AEROFUND FINANCWUTOP HAT $231.45 MEETING EXPENSE 159909 TORNELL&COTTON $1.154.00 LEGAL SERVICES ' 159910 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $13041 TRUCK PARTS 159911 EDITH TRAIN $311.27 EXPENSE REIMB. 159912 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,973.76 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5.11-94 159913 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $222.57 TRUCK PARTS 159914 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $2,034.46 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159915 TULE RANCHtMAGAN FARMS $34.249.19 RESIDUALS REMOVAL 159918 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $113.00 LAB SUPPLIES 159917 UIBSOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $152.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159918 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $21.48 PARCEL SERVICES 159919 DATAVAULT 7 US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.0D OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 159920 UNIVERSITY OF CA.REGENTS $15.00 PUBLICATION 159921 URBAN WATER INSTITUTE $150.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159922 VPPPA $400.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159923 VWR SCIENTIFIC $6,728.16 LAB SUPPLIES 159924 VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO.INO $613.74 LAB SUPPLIES µ 159925 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $247.28 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 0 159926 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC. $1,254.79 LAB SUPPLIES 159927 VARKEL CONSTRUCTION INC $34,230.30 CONSTRUCTION J-11-2 RETENTION RELEASE 159928 VERNE'S PLUMBING $1.470.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 159929 VERTEX BUSINESS INTERIORS $671.51 OFFICE FURNITURE 159930 VILLAGE NURSERIES $187.95 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 159931 VISION SERVICE PLAN-(CA) $7,614.60 VISION PLAN PREMIUM-JUNE 97 159932 WASTE MARKETS $63,988.02 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO3-27-96 159933 WATERS CORPORATION $1,D87.64 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159934 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY $932.44 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159935 WAYNE ELECTRIC $350.19 MOTOR 159936 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $25.554.72 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 159937 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. $306.12 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159938 WESTSIDE BLDG MATERIAL CORP $1,039.68 TOOLS 159939 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC. $505.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159940 WILLIAM T&LYNN S WHITE& 15,000.00 CLAIM SETTLEMENT 159941 CHARLES F.WINSOR $80825 EXPENSE REIMB. 159942 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN&SMART $99,696.72 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26.95 159943 XEROX CORP. $9,840.45 COPIER LEASES 159W GARY YOUNG $300.00 MOVE LAB EQUIPMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0625/97 $2,209,326.08 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08121/97 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND 53,294.88 01 CONST FUND $6.523.30 02 OPER FUND $13.195.09 02CONSTFUND $18.492.06 03 OPER FUND $19,827.38 03 CAP FAC FUND $254.136.00 03 CONST FUND $19,985.52 05 OPER FUND $2,127.65 05 CAP FAC FUND $153.60 05 CONST FUND $5.973.02 06 OPER FUND $1,320.95 08 CONST FUND $4.874.85 t.. 07 OPER FUND $3,295.82 o• 07 CONST FUND $6,910.75 n 011 OPER FUND 52,004.98 ly 011 CAP FAC FUND $69,023.90 V 011 CONST FUND $6.037.22 011 CONST FUND E239.52 014 OPER FUND $461.00 014 CONST FUND $1.408.92 0586 OPER FUND $17.16 US86 CAP FAC FUND $456AO 0887 OPER FUND 5216A9 07814 OPER FUND $828.58 JT OPER FUND $776,271.71 CORF $446.441.28 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $27,919.24 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $517.686.00 $2.209.326.03 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 077MAJ7 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159964 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES,INC. $323.52 TOOLS 159965 AMA PADGETT-THOMPSON 5695.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 159M ARMA INTERNATIONAL $140.OD MEMBERSHIP 159987 ASTI)(AM SOC FOR TRNG&DVLPT) $180.00 MEMBERSHIPS 159968 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $561,093.90 CONSTRUCTION J-34-1,P2-35.5 159969 AIR DUCT CLEANING $6,256.00 AIR DUCT CLEANING SERVICES 159970 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $56.026.03 O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89 169971 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $9.44 AIR FREIGHT 159972 ALADDIN HOUSE $182.45 WINDOW BLINDS 159973 AMERICAN AIRLINES 53,438.48 TRAVEL SERVICES 159974 AMERICAN CRANE INSTITUTE $2,975.DO ON-SITE TRAINING 159975 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $562.24 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 159976 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $2.900.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159977 AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC $99.00 PUBLICATION 159978 AMERICAN RED CROSS $5,80BA0 SAFETY VIDEO'S&MANUELS 159979 AMERICAN SIGMA $3.757.61 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES % 159980 AMSA $975.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION Imo+. 159981 SLAKE P.ANDERSON $129.37 EXPENSE REIMB. M 1599B2 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 58,079.63 NOTICES&ADS ^ 159983 ARENS INDUSTRIES.INC. $2,481.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 0 159M ARGO ELECTRIC SUPPLY $102.52 ELECTRIC PARTS �. 159985 ARMOR-VAC $450.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 159986 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $105.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 159987 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $858.54 PAYROLL SERVICES 159998 SSCI(SALLANTYNE COMPUT SRV) $440.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 159989 BANANA BLUEPRINT $3.094.41 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 159990 BAR TECH TELECOM,INC. $6.171.87 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION 159991 BARCO PRODUCTS CO $798.37 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 159992 BARNEBYSUTCLIFFE CORP. $253.22 FILTER MEDIA 159993 LAYNE BAROLDI $108.69 EXPENSE REIMB. 159994 BELL PIPE&SUPPLY CO $3.011.62 VALVE PARTS 159995 ELOISE BENSON $1,500.00 PERMIT FEE 159996 ANGIE BERDANIS $245.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159997 810-GRO DIVISION $38,721.11 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 159998 BLACK&VEATCH $43027 ENGINEERING SERVICES P145 159999 BLACK BOX CORP $475.68 TOOLS 160000 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4.994.21 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.4-14-93 160001 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $193.95 TRUCK REPAIRS 160002 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $4.631.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.18 ISD003 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $327.25 INSTRUMENT 160D04 BUDGETJANITORIAL $3,095.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1.12-94 160005 BURLINGTON SAFETY LAB INC. $207.00 TESTING 160006 CRG MARINE LAB $500.00 OCEAN MONITORING 160OD7 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $101.29 LAB SUPPLIES 1600M CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $997.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT 16M CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $666.00 MOVING SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07108M7 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09197 POSTING DATE 071=97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160010 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $7,300.00 INVESTMENT ADVICE SERVICES 160011 CALOLYMPIC GLOVE$SAFETY $1,137.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES ' 160012 CAMP DRESSER 8 MC KEE INC $370.707.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 160013 CANUS CORPORATION $4.189.86 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 160014 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $72,525.47 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-2a95 160015 RICHARD CASTILLON $1,201.28 EXPENSE REIMB. 160016 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. 528,092.44 OFFICE FURNITURE 160017 CHAPMAN COUNSELING $2,198.00 ON-SITE TRAINING 160018 CLAY-TON ENVIRO CONSULT $1,980.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160019 COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION $1.615.94 SOFTWARE 160020 COUCH 8 SONS $37.727.97 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 160021 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $8.328.70 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160D22 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $10,310.60 PUMP PARTS 1WO23 COMPUCOM SYSTEMS $27,803A8 COMPUTER PARTS 160024 COMPUCOM $216.61 COMPUTER PARTS 160025 COMPUTERS AMERICA $1,570.41 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 160026 COMPUSERVE $1,171.35 COMPUTER SERVICES 160027 JAMES CONE $9$D.38 EXPENSE REIMB. 160028 CONNELL GM PARTS 7 DIV. $70.18 TRUCK PARTS n 160029 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST ES,18S.D3 ELECTRIC PARTS 160030 CONSUMER PIPE $2.419.70 PLUMBING SUPPLIES I 1fi0031 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC. $3,195.94 LAB SUPPLIES N 160032 CDS I NEDCO 581.64 ELECTRIC PARTS 160033 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $90.651.7$ ENGINE PARTS 160034 CORPORATEEXPRESS $5,764A5 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160035 COUNCIL ON EDUCATION $295.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 160036 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $2,232.15 ELECTRIC PARTS 160037 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $901.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS 16003E CUTLER HAMMER $300.11 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 160039 JAN DEBAY $63.68 DIRECTORS EXPENSE REIMB. 160040 DELL MARKETING L.P. $27,436.91 COMPUTERS 160041 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $37.120.71 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN 160042 DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES $426.20 SERVICE CHARGE 160D43 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $4,640.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 160D44 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $1,136,09t(X) PROPERTY INSURANCE MO5-13.92.6 10.92 160045 DUNKEL BROS MACH MOVING $600.00 MOVING SERVICES 160046 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $109.65 PAINT SUPPLIES 160047 ELECTRIC MACHINERY $1,787.57 ELECTRIC PARTS 160048 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $969.75 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 160049 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 160050 MARKESQUER $586.55 EXPENSE REIMB. 160051 DANNY EVANGELISTA $284.17 EXPENSE REIMB. 160052 FMC CORPORATION $293,876.44 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO9-14-94 160053 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $240.86 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 16D054 FAMILY HEALTH PLAN $34.394.08 MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM 160055 FIBERTRON $2.367.90 FIBER OPTIC CABLE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/06M7 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160056 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $547.80 FILTERS 160057 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE $360.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160058 BAILEY FISCHER&PORTER CO. $756.34 ROLL CHARTS 160059 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1,155,98 ELECTRIC PARTS 160060 FLAT&VERTICAL,INC. $703,00 CONCRETE CUTTING 160051 PLO-SYSTEMS INC. 91,279.00 PUMP PARTS 150062 FLOWERS BY CINA $91 59 FLOWERS(DECEASED EMPLOYEE) 160083 FORMA SYSTEMS $9,600.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16DO64 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $2,98675 WATER USE 160065 THE FOXBORO CO. 8219S5 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160066 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $111.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160067 FRYS ELECTRONICS $2.102.37 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 160068 GST,INC. $2,643.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160069 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $6.133.67 CHEMICALS 160070 TOM GAWORSKI $215.15 EXPENSE REIMS, �1 1OW71 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.172.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES 160072 GEORGETOWN PUBLISHING $97.00 PUBLICATION I. 160073 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $54.00 LAB SUPPLIES P 160074 WIN GRAINGER,INC. $1.255.08 COMPRESSOR PARTS � 180075 GRASSY S.T.I. E2,697.82 ENGINE PARTS n 160076 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $229.66 PRINTING w 160077 DGA CONSULTANTS $7,600.03 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6894 16007B HACH COMPANY $7,104.34 LAB SUPPLIES 160079 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $914.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160080 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,451.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 160081 PL HAWN CO,INC. $27.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 160082 HELLO DIRECT,INC. $219.93 TELEPHONE HEADSET 16W83 HERB'S BLACK FOREST BAKERY $76.40 CATERING SERVICES 160054 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 160085 HEWLETT PACKARD CO $336.41 TOOLS 160086 HUNSAKER&ASSOC IRVINE,INC $4,206.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160D67 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,567.09 WATER USE 160088 IDEXX $659.97 LAB SUPPLIES 16DO89 IPCO SAFETY $19.942.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES 180090 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $78.65 CONNECTORS 160091 INGERSOLL-RAND EQUIP CORP $12.056.15 COMPRESSOR 160092 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $223.95 TRUCK PARTS 160093 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT S2.90 WATER USE 160094 JAMISON ENGINEERING,INC. $27.080.27 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 160095 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $452.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 160096 JAYS CATERING $253.00 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 160097 JENSEN TOOLS INC $460.35 VACUUM 160096 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $933.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 160099 JOINT INSTRUMENTATION COMMITTEE $25.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 160100 KAISER PERMANENTE $24,027.23 MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM - 16D101 KEENAN SUPPLY $15.21 WELDING SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 07/08/97 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160102 KELAR CORPORATION $6.320.00 ON-SITE TRAINING 160103 KELLY WRIGHT HARDWOODS $2.362.62 PLYWOOO 160104 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $140,455.07 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9@7-95 160105 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $53.90 MACHINE PARTS 160f06 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,659.79 TOOLS 160107 KQA,INC. $510.31 PERMIT FEE REFUND 160108 VLADIMIR KOGAN $1,300.70 EXPENSE REIMS. 160109 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $2,056.36 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 160110 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $5,385.70 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 160111 JOHN M LEAVELL PE $5.016.00 ON-SITE TRAINING 160112 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $24,110.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES 160113 LEXIS-NEXIS $277.50 SUBSCRIPTION 160114 UEBERT CASSIDY&FRIERSON $15.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160115 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. $35.280.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160116 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $1,314.55 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES �1 11017 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $112.49 VALVE PARTS 1i 160118 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $1,062J54.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 160119 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $446,224.86 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 c 160120 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $124,290.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 n 160121 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $152.54 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160122 MCJUNKINCORP $667.28 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1 160123 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $182.80 TOOLS c 160124 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES,INC. $289.88 FILTERS 160125 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $1,084.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160128 METRA HEALTH $136,324.72 MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM 160127 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,737.48 UNIFORM RENTALS 160128 MONITOR LABS $1,591.10 INSTRUMENT 160129 MONTGOMERY WATSON $29,250.00 AIR TOXICS PROJECT MO I2-12-90 160130 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $788.38 PUMP PARTS 160131 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $25,790.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 160132 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $3.079.93 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160133 NETWORK CATALYST,INC $2,733.36 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 160134 NEW HERMES INC $81.20 PLASTIC FOR ENGRAVING MACHINE 160135 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $75.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS 160135 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $51.35 WATER USE 160137 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE $9,690.00 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 160138 NWLAND/OR $9,760.48 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 160139 OI CORPORATION $362.52 LAB SUPPLIES 160140 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1,197.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160141 OPTIO SOFTWARE INC $15.270.00 SOFTWARE 160142 ORANGE COAST PETROLEUM EQUIP $307.09 FUEL NOZZLE 160143 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $25.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 160144 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $4,892.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160145 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $1,049.55 FITTINGS 160146 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $2.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160147 OXYGEN SERVICE 5263.68 SPECIALTY GASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 071OB/97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09197 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160148 COUNTY OF ORANGE $3,360.00 PERMITS 160149 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $5,120.11 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 160150 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $135.32 OPERATING SUPPLIES 160151 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,121.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160152 PACIFIC PARTS 8 CONTROLS,INC. $6,027.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 160153 PACIFIC BELL $21.73 TELEPHONE SERVICES 160154 PAN ENERGY TRADING B MARKET $115.794.90 NATURAL GAS 160155 PARTS UNLIMITED $280.54 TRUCK PARTS 160156 PENN WELL PUBLISHING CO $939.76 PUBLICATIONS 160157 PERMA SEAL $7.873.22 LURE OIL 160158 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $1,786.99 REIMS,PETTY CASH 150159 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $83.624.80 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29.95 160160 POLYPURE,INC. $23,245.90 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 150161 POWER MAINTENANCE INTER.INC $1.433.00 BATTERY REPAIR 160162 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $779.34 PUMP PARTS 160163 OMC $295.79 HOSES F� 160164 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $53,177.33 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS y 160165 RB R INSTRUMENTS $73.69 ELECTRICPARTS o' 180168 THE REGISTER $499.80 NOTICES 8 ADS n 160167 MARCY ROTHENBERG $787.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES C1 160188 SCAP $24,000A0 MEMBERSHIP 160169 SETAC PRESS $53.00 PUBLICATION tr 160170 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO $17,62221) SENCHMARKING STUDY CONSULTANT 160171 RONALD E SALEM PSY D $125.0D ON-SITE SEMINAR 160172 SAVANT AUDIO VISUAL $1,509.63 PUBLICATIONS 160173 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $9.384.64 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.8-8-94 160174 SCIENTIFIC REFRIGERATION $2.016.25 CONTROLLER UPGRADE 160175 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2.427.79 TOOLS 160176 SHURELUCK SALES $1.654.41 TOOLS/HARDWARE 160177 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $255.00 CERAMIC PROBE 160178 SMITH PIPE B SUPPLY $84.76 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160179 SOUTH COAST WATER $350.00 LAB SUPPLIES 160180 SO CALIF EDISON CO $56,641.20 POWER 160181 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SER $2,050.52 CONDENSER HEAD 160182 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $113.24 WATER USE 160183 SUMMIT STEEL $371,49 METAL 160184 SUNSETFORD $38327 TRUCK PARTS 160185 SUPELCO,INC. $826.71 LAB SUPPLIES 160196 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $791.522.10 CONSTRUCTION P2.35.3,P1.38.5,P2.46,P2-55 160187 SYMCAS,INC. $285.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 160186 TVS CONSULTING $200.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 160189 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $230 80 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 16019D TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $882.75 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 160191 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 160192 ATINT OF CLASS $3,188.25 WINDOWTINTING 160193 TONY'S LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $249.88 LOCKS 8 KEYS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 07/08/97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07MM7 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1601M TORNELL&COTTON $3.297.50 LEGAL SERVICES 160195 EDWARD M.TORRES 5250.00 TRAVEL ADVANCE 160196 TOSHIBA ACCESSORIES/ $264.00 LAPTOP COMPUTER BATTERY 160197 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $762.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS 160198 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $727.31 TRUCK PARTS 160199 TRANSCAT $4.617.14 CALIBRATOR 160200 TRI-STATE SEMINAR OWTHE-RIVER $40.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 160201 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $7,750.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 160202 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $134.30 TRUCK PARTS 100203 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $66.34 TRUCK PARTS 160204 TRUESDAIL LABS $312.00 LAB SERVICES 160205 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $3.331.46 INSTRUMENT PARTS 160205 TULE RANCH I MAGAN FARMS $34.723.80 RESIDUALS REMOVAL 160207 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $344.38 PARCEL SERVICES 160208 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,827.16 LAB SUPPLIES 180209 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $31.31 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160210 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $387.09 FIBER OPTICS t„ 160211 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,618.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT T 160212 WACKENHUT CORP. $8,9SS.15 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS n 160213 WASTE MARKETS 540,331.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3.27-96 n 160214 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY $1,859.30 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 160215 WEFTEC VT $1,470.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 160216 WESTERN FEDERAL INC $500.00 DEGREASER 160217 WESTERN MEDICAL CENTER $1.253.02 ROCONCILIATION REFUND 160218 WESTERN PACIFIC ALLIANCE CO. $183.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 160219 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. 5437.71 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 160220 JOHN WILEY&SONS.INC. $170.41 PUBLICATION 180221 JUDITH A.WILSON $406.40 EXPENSE REIMS. 160222 WOMEN'S ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL $500.00 BEACH CLEAN-UP SPONSERSHIP 160223 XEROX CORP. $1.871.94 COPIER LEASES 160224 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $865.36 LAB SUPPLIES 180225 ZYMARK CORP. $436.00 LAB SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 $6,589,165.60 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST NARKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 071OM7 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 SUMMARY AMOUNT $1 OPER FUND $357.40 $2 OPER FUND $11,194.40 #2 CAP FAC FUND $4.206.00 83 OPER FUND $9.281.81 #3 CAP FAC FUND $6.706.70 $5 OPER FUND $2.542.81 #5 CAP FAC FUND $2.248.00 $6 OPER FUND $148.20 #7 OPER FUND $2,592.51 $7 CAP FAC FUND $11.851.64 011 OPER FUND $1.416.65 #11 CAP FAC FUND $112,289.22 R3&11 OPER FUND 525,790.00 µ #5&6 OPER FUND $5,344.90 S $566 CAP FAC FUND $43.02 5887 OPER FUND $1.901.67 87&14 OPER FUND $4,381.99 J JT OPER FUND $2,377,316.20 CORP $3,603,282.09 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $7,203.44 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $399,088.05 $6.589,165.60 For Bd.Sec,Use Only AGENDA ❑ COMM.INFO,ITEM ITEM ❑ COMM,ACTION ITEM ❑ JT.BIDS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT.BDS.DISCUSSION (NON-CONSENT) J BEARING JT.BDS.MEETING DATE T.BDS.AGENDA REM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.to.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Originator) PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR 2220/Ross H. Tipps 12558 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: 09/24/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wording: RATIFYING PAYMENTOF CLAIMS OF THE JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS BY ROLL CALL VOTE (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Recommended Action(s): 1. Staff recommends approval of payment of claims/warrant listing. CEQAREVIEW: Pmjeetis Exempt: YES NO NOTAPPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC Data Notice of Exemption Filed: ITEM: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGETBALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES Rau,�&3 T,eule,al TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ N/A N/A N/A N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGETCHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION BUDGET TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NOYES REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES NO NOT APPLICABLE If YES,state number. _Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Rry Wt4aT Page 1 of 2 HAV IRDTAIFIN12220WIPPSW IT.WPD ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Usq: 9A 1. inetor Date f � CONCURR 0 a ecrate n Mana r Or in 9 ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) Llo A7 26v, a Date ertrrrent etl(Or Designee) Signature Date AseistaM General Manager(Dr Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager e,,,, Mw Page 2 of 2 H AW P.DTA%F I N V2=TI P PS W R.W P D +' FUND NO 9199 - JT DIRT WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/22/97 PAGE 1 - REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/23/97 POSTING DATE 07/23/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160241 AGX CORPORATION $419.05 GAUGE 160242 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $139.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 180243 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,339.67 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 1602" AT&T-PRO WATTS $843.30 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 160245 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $16.88 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 160246 ANSI $496.00 D.O.T.TRAINING PROGRAM 160247 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $129.67 HARDWARE 160248 ACCENT INDUSTRIES.INC. $9.533.00 AWNINGS 150249 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $598.00 DOOR REPAIRS 160250 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $109.91 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS 160251 ALTA-ROBBINS $153.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160252 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $4,693.10 MECHANICAL PARTS 160253 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $58.24 EXPENSE REIMB. 160264 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $470.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 180255 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 160256 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $1.396.48 TUBING 160257 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT $875.98 FILTERS 160268 BARNES&NOBLE BOOKS $861.54 PUBLICATIONS 160259 BAVCO $1,579.62 MECHANICAL PARTS 160260 BEAR COMMUNICATIONS INC. $1.797.34 UHF RADIO 160261 81O-GRO DIVISION $27.778.61 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4.26-95 160262 BOLT TECH $3.202.28 TOOLS 160263 BOOT BARN $118.42 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 160264 BORNEMANN PUMPS,INC. $51.39 PUMP PARTS 160266 BUSINESS&LEGAL REPORTS $495.00 SOFTWARE 160268 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $4,244.00 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 160267 CEPA $882.00 LAB SUPPLIES 160268 CH2M HILL $19,916.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 160269 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS 160270 CPU COMPUTER REPAIR $162.97 COMPUTER REPAIR 160271 CS COMPANY $1.941.04 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 100272 CALTROL,INC. $1,574.02 HARDWARE 160273 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEE INC $55,284.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 160274 CANUS CORPORATION $2.425.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 160275 CARDLLO ENGINEERS $56.296.38 ENGINEERING SERVICES MID 6-24-95 180276 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $13.108.59 OFFICE FURNITURE 160277 CENTURY PAINT $546.51 PAINT SUPPLIES 160278 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $580.00 PUMP PARTS 160279 CLOSSON&CLOSSON $1.482.50 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 160280 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $563.99 SERVICE AGREEMENT 160281 COMBYTE USA INC. $531.00 MICRO SCANNER 160282 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $9,657.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160283 COMPUCOM SYSTEMS $8.642.02 SOFTWARE UPGRADE 160284 COMPUTER GRAPHICS GROUP $726.05 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160265 CONDENSER&CHILLER SERVICE $11,359.89 CONDENSER COILS 160286 CONFIDENTIAL MGMT SERVICES $32,806.56 INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/22/97 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/23/97 POSTING DATE 07/23/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160287 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,494.09 ELECTRIC PARTS 160288 CONTINENTAL-MCLAUGHLIN $129.08 TOOLS 160289 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $585.43 ENGINE PARTS 160290 CORE LABORATORIES,INC. $2,400.00 LAB SUPPLIES 160291 CORPORATE EXPRESS $992.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160292 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $91.17 TRUCK PARTS 160293 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,683.98 ELECTRIC PARTS 160294 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS 54,210.W CONSULTING SERVICES 160295 OM ASSOCIATES $11,357.03 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160296 DAILY PILOT $26.00 NOTICES&ADS 160297 J.W.VANGELO CO.,INC. $1,123.83 BUILDING MATERIALS 160298 TOM DAWES $13,005.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160299 DAY&NIGHT DOOR SVC INC $3,708.00 STEEL DOOR 160300 DELL MARKETING L P. $64,487.26 COMPUTERS 160301 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $760.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 160302 DIAMOND H RECOGNITION $259.14 SERVICE AWARDS 160303 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $5,666.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 160304 DIONEX CORP. $3,453.26 LAB SUPPLIES 160305 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $380.31 PAINT SUPPLIES 160306 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS TESTING INC $12,215.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 160307 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $9,095.95 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 160308 ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT CONSULTING 52,596.18 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160309 EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT SERV CEN $1,229.63 PAINT SUPPLIES 160310 EXPERTGRAPHICS 52,816.11 SOFTWARE 160311 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $236.83 AIR FREIGHT 160312 FIBERTRON $39.25 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 160313 BAILEY FISCHER&PORTER CO. $467.72 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 160314 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $994.98 LAB SUPPLIES 180316 FLOSYSTEMS $531A0 PUMP PARTS 160316 FORKERT ENGINEERING&SURVEY $1,321.63 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M06-8-94 160317 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $109.70 PHOTO SUPPLIES 160318 THE FOXBORO CO. $245.83 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160319 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $1.893.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160320 GIST,INC. $1,782.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160321 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $9,917.09 CHEMICALS 160322 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,658.06 TELEPHONE SERVICES 160323 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $31,84040 PUMP PARTS 160324 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $202.00 LAB SUPPLIES 160325 W W GRAINGER,INC. $80.81 COMPRESSOR PARTS 160326 GRASSY S.T.I. $730.48 ENGINE PARTS 160327 GREATAMERICAN PRINTING $3,281.45 PRINTING 160328 ODA CONSULTANTS $12,003.78 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-94 1B0329 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $1,566.69 PRINTING 160330 HACH COMPANY $92.84 LAB SUPPLIES 160331 HARBOUR ENGINEERING 52,852.31 MECHANICAL PARTS 160332 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,316.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O7/2M7 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0723/97 POSTING DATE 0723/87 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160333 PL HAWN CO,INC. $26.94 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 160334 EO HELLER'S SON INC $97.62 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 160335 HEWLETTPACKARD $34.48 SERVICE AGREEMENT 160335 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $1,376.18 TOOLS 160337 ISCO,INC. $102.D4 INSTRUMENT 160338 LINDA HOLMES $3.437.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160339 HOME DEPOT $42.74 SMALL HARDWARE 160340 HRDIRECT $212.45 SOFTWARE 160341 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. 5448.54 PAINTSUPPLIES 160342 HUNSAKER S ASSOC IRVINE,INC $78.00 EASEMENT SERVICES 160343 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $38.04 WATER USE 160344 IPCO SAFETY $3.623.83 SAFETY SUPPLIES 150345 ISCO,INC. $13,423.07 INSTRUMENT 160346 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $160.36 CONNECTORS 160347 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $28.10 WATER USE 150348 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1.996.71 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 160349 KEENAN SUPPLY $698.76 WELDING SUPPLIES 180350 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $26.901.99 FERRIC CHLORIDE M0 9-2745 160351 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $136.71 MACHINE PARTS 160352 KIRK EXPRESS $131.61 PAPER 160353 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2.039.87 TOOLS 160354 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $772,34 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 160355 LAMOTTE COMPANY $170.01 TEST KIT IW3% LAB SYSTEMS $6,021.45 INTEGRATION SERVICES 160357 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $30.89 SAFETY SUPPLIES 160358 LABWARE INC. $152,000.00 LAB INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM SOFTWARE NO 2-26-07 160359 EMILY LANCASTER,M.S.W. $125.00 ON-SITE SEMINAR 160360 LEE 8 RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $29,773.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES 160361 LIMITOROUE CORP. $1,687.63 ELECTRIC PARTS 160362 THE LITIGATION GROUP $7,674.08 LEGAL SERVICES 160363 LOOICWORKS INC $3.408.54 SOFTWARE 160354 LOS ANGELES GALVANIZING CO. 5214.23 GALVANIZE GAP PLATES 160365 MPS $1.908.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 160366 MACOMCO $163.26 SERVICE AGREEMENT 160367 MANDIC MOTORS $104.00 TOWING SERVICES 160365 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $262.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160369 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $133.42 EXPENSE REIMB. 160370 DAWN MCKINLEY $119.78 EXPENSE REIMB. 160371 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $62.84 TOOLS 160372 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $64.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160373 MESA MUFFLER $303.95 TRUCK PARTS 160374 METRA HEALTH $15,413.50 MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM 160376 MIDWAY MFG.6 MACHINING $16,077.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 160376 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2,045.69 UNIFORM RENTALS 160377 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $120.00 INSTRUMENT 160378 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $882.00 OFFICE TRAILER LEASE FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/22/97 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0723W POSTING DATE 07/23/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160379 MOBILE MINI,INC $3,045.07 STORAGE BINS 160380 MONITOR LABS $4,199.43 INSTRUMENT 160381 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $529.09 PUMP PARTS 160382 MULTIFORCE CORPORATION $240.00 CONTROLLER SUNSCREEN 160383 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $12.905.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 160384 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $5.455.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160385 NETWORK CATALYST,INC $2,101.13 FIBER OPTICS 160386 CHUNG NGUYEN $109.45 EXPENSE REIMB. 160387 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,674.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160388 OMNI WESTERN INC $368.51 TOOLS 160389 ONE ON ONE COMPUTER TRAINING $971.25 SUBSCRIPTION 160390 ORANGE COAST PIPE SUPPLY $204.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160391 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $1.516.08 PUMP PARTS 1603W ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1.744.34 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160393 ORANGE COURIER $270.00 COURIER SERVICES 160394 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $340.51 FITTINGS 160395 OXYGEN SERVICE $3,124.25 SPECIALTY GASES 160396 COUNTY OF ORANGE $8,565.00 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING FEE 160397 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $27,160.81 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 160398 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $605.59 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160399 PACIFIC PARTS 8 CONTROLS.INC. $1,905.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS 160400 PACO PUMPS $1.681.59 PUMP PARTS 160401 PACIFIC BELL $79.16 TELEPHONE SERVICES 160002 PANAMETRICS $9.816.13 METER 160403 PERMA SEAL $7.927.90 LUSE OIL 160404 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $883.32 REIMB.PETTY CASH 160405 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC. $68,940.39 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO.3.29.95 160406 POLYPURE,INC. $7,066.54 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 160407 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $200.00 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 160408 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $714.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 160409 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $369.20 PUMP PARTS 160410 R M CONTROLS $165.76 INSTRUMENT PARTS 160411 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $1,081.31 ELECTRIC PARTS 160412 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $190.71 LAB SUPPLIES 160413 BOLT DELIVERY $99.00 FREIGHT 160414 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $287.37 ELECTRIC PARTS 160415 REMEDYTEMP $26,840.D8 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 160416 ADRIANA RENESCU $724.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 160417 ROSEMOUNT,INC. $297.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 160418 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $80.39 JUNCTION BOX COVER 16D419 RYAN-HERCO $279.T METAL 160420 SAVANTAUDIO VISUAL $494.49 SOFTWARE 160421 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $39.82 PUMP PARTS 160422 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $10.678.87 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 16D423 SEARS $650.72 REFRIGERATOR 16D424 SECOND-SUN $587.87 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0722/97 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0723r97 POSTING DATE 0723197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160425 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $163.03 METER CONNECTOR 160426 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $237.59 TOOLS 160427 SHURELUCK SALES $2,965.37 TOOLS/HARDWARE 1611428 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $1,800.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 160429 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $932.94 TOOLS 160430 SOUTH COAST WATER $808.13 LAB SUPPLIES 160431 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AIR $1,184.17 WINDOW AIR CONDITIONER 160432 SO CALIF EDISON CO $7.680.28 POWER 160433 SO CALIF EDISON CO $49,637.28 POWER 160434 SO CAL GAS CO $19,143.40 NATURAL GAS 160435 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $88DDD RENTAL EQUIPMENT 160436 SPEX CERTIPREP INC. $487.91 LAB SUPPLIES 160437 STANDARD SUPP 8 EQUIP CO INC $627.59 ELECTRIC MOTOR 160438 STAR14A CELLS,INC. $24BA9 LAB SUPPLIES 160439 STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING $518.79 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 160440 SUMMIT STEEL $1.692.22 METAL 160441 SUNSET FORD $39.50 TRUCK PARTS 160442 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $193.56 HOSE 160N3 SUPELCO,INC. $597.97 LAB SUPPLIES 160444 SUPER CHEM CORP. $343.51 CHEMICALS 160445 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $1,616.26 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 160446 SYSCOM INC $12,550.00 ON-SITE TRAINING 180447 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $517.17 MECHANICAL PARTS 160448 AEROFUND FINANCIAL $816.21 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 160449 TORNELL B COTTON $2.154.90 LEGAL SERVICES 160450 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $2.400.00 CONTRACT GR0UNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11A4 160451 TRUESDAIL LABS $2.263.60 LAB SERVICES 160452 MICHELLE TUCHMAN $265.15 EXPENSE REIMS. 1SO453 TUTHILL CORPORATION $54.05 GASKET 160464 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $817.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160455 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $110.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE ISM56 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,D52.63 LAB SUPPLIES 160457 VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO.INC. $103.24 LAB SUPPLIES 160458 VALCOM S13TU SOFTWARE 160459 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1.582.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160460 VARIAN ASSOCIATES $835.54 FILTERS 160461 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $132.43 FIBER OPTICS 16D462 WACKENHUT CORP. $1,856.40 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 160463 WARRINGTON $213.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 160464 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $1,448.96 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 160465 WATERS CORPORATION $70.97 SERVICE AGREEMENT 160466 THE WASTEWATER CONNECTION $1.192.40 METAL DETECTOR 160467 WESTERN BUSINESS SYSTEMS $315.29 PAYROLL CHECK STOCK 160468 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $31,680.08 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23.95 160469 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC. $195.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160470 WOODWARD CLYDE CONSULTANTS $2,322.02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/22/97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/23/97 POSTING DATE 0723/97 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160471 %ETE% $1,194.48 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 160472 YORK INTERNATIONAL $87.33 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/23/97 $1.186,721.81 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $600.00 42 OPER FUND $26,141.80 #3 OPER FUND $14.656.61 #3 CAP FAC FUND $2,223.31 #5 OPER FUND $705.00 #6 OPER FUND $210.00 #7 OPER FUND $1,365.17 #7 CAP FAC FUND $4.280.90 #11 OPER FUND $2,478.86 #11 CAP FAC FUND $20.16 0586 CAP FAC FUND $1,376.18 07814 OPER FUND $7,598.71 JT OPER FUND $453,014.50 CORP $474,352.76 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $37,739.68 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $169,959.98 $1,196.721.61 County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 08/06197 Check No. Vendor Amount Desorption 5501 Advanco Constructors,Inc. $1.167,582.60 Construction J-34-1 ,P2-35.5 5502 Barclays Bank PLC $189,632.72 cop Letter Of Credit 5503 Bio-Gro Division $27,048.24 Residuals Removal MO 4-26-95 5504 Browmv&Caldwell Consultants $42.604.21 Engineering Services Res 93-101 5505 Canus Corporation $37.094.00 Fiber Optic Cable 5506 Clayton Environmental Consultants $27,039.08 Professional Services 5507 County Sanitation Disbics $29.719.87 Reimburse Workers Comp 5508 Crane Veyor Corp. $26.222.37 Inspection Port Hardware 5509 Dell Marketing L.P. $42,951.06 Computers 5510 FMC Corporation $113,383.91 Hydrogen Peroxide M09-14.94 5511 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. $66.054.69 Ferric Chloride M09.27-95 5512 Margate Construction.inn $724.734.00 Construction PIJ6-2 5513 Margate Construction,inn $99,760.00 Construction P1 40-2(Rebid),P247-2(Rebid) 5514 Margate Comsmnrction,Inc. $251,408.84 Construction Pt<1,P143 5515 Northwestern-Reliastar $21.464.93 Basic Lift,lnsu mm, 016 Pacific Investment Management $126,022.00 Investment Mgmt.Service Res.95-75 5517 Pacificere Of Ca $30.054.03 Health Insurance Premium 5518 Penn W lsan $50.298.99 CNG Fueling Station MO 1-24-96 5519 Potypure,Inc.Wor Polydyne $56,308.34 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 5620 Science Applications Inrl $36.787.08 Ocean Monitoring M064.94 5521 Sverdrup Civil,Inc. $479,855.30 Construction P2453,Pt-38-5,P2.46,P2.55 5522 Tule Ranch!Magan Farm $68,39im Residuals Removal 5523 Vapex Inc. $167,525.00 Foul Air Monitors 5524 A T&T-Cellular CR&R $3.60 Long Distance Telephone Services 5525 AT&T-Megacom Service $2,856.80 Long Distance Telephone Services 5526 AT&T-Cellular CR&R $6.60 Long Distance Telephone Services 5527 AT&T-Cellular CR&R $22.43 Long Distance Telephone Services 5528 AT&T-Magacem Service $843.30 Long Distance Telephone Services 5529 A.C.T.I I.D.P. $300.00 Service Agreement 5530 Academic Press $68.34 Publications 5531 Acemle Air Engineering $757.86 Fillers 5532 Action Door Repair Corp $8.696.00 Door Repairs 5533 Air Liquids America Corp. $2,017.34 Specialty Gases 6534 Air Products&Chemicals $W9.61 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen.Syst MO 8.9.89 5535 Alberlsens Inc.#1930 $210.00 Permit Fee Refund 5536 Alta-Robbins,Inc. $116.03 Instrument Supplies 5537 Alums-Systems USA,Inc. $2.390.00 Scaffolding Rental 5538 American Airlines $5,955.35 Travel Services 6539 American Banker Newsle8ers $596.00 Subscription 5540 American Management Association $75.79 Publications 5541 American Type Culture $147.75 Publications 6642 Amerldma $333.96 Office Equipment 5543 Anmek,Inc $93.74 Equipment Repair 55" Anthony Past Control $180.00 Service Agreement 5545 Appleone Employment Service $2,703.43 Temporary Employment Services 5545 Applied Industrial Technology $2,114.93 Pump Parts County Sanitati0n Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 08/06/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 5547 Asbury Emlronmemal $470.00 Waste Oil Removal 5548 Aquatic Bioassay&Consulting $70.00 Lab Services 5549 Associated Vacuum Tech.,Ina $137.49 Filler 5550 Association of Calif.Water $120.00 Publication 5551 AIkINJones Computer Service $321.30 Service Agreement 5552 Aulodesk,Ino. $219.66 Electrical Supplies 5553 ADI Control Techniques $244.66 Electrical Supplies 5554 AGX Corporation $225.11 Valve 5555 AWSI $1,628.98 D.O.T.Training Program 6556 Bailey Fischer&Porter $485.20 Office Supplies 5557 Ballantyne Computer Service $440.00 Consulting Services 5558 Banana Blueprint $7.818.35 Printing MO 1"7-94 5559 Bankers Security Life Insurance $3,578.40 Voluntary Life Insurance Premium 5560 Bar Tech Telecom,Inc. $3,241.00 Telephone Installation 5561 Be=Visual system $2,759.40 Service Agreement 6562 Bames&Noble Books $745.06 Publications 6563 Battery Specialties $139.64 Batteries 5564 Backman Instruments $988.00 Lab Equipment 5565 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. $264.39 Valve Parts 5566 Benz Engineering.Inc. $129.03 Compressor Parts 5567 Bermingham Controls $149.98 Gasket KB 5568 Black Box Corporation 5873.69 Computer Pads 5569 Blau Cotton Photography $250.00 Executive Forbad 5570 Bolas Radiator Service $227.64 Tack Repairs 5571 guilders Book,Inc. $428.52 Publications 5572 Burke Engineering Co. $253.62 Electric Supplies 5573 BNA Communications,Inc. $4,048.85 Training Videos 6574 BNI Building News $43.11 Publication 5575 Cal-Glass,Inc $155.16 Lab Equipment Repair 5676 California Auto Collision,Inc. $1,688.68 Truck Body Repair 5577 California Water Erwiroment $61.00 Conference Registration 5578 Celolympie Safety $516.43 Safety Supplies 5579 Callrol,Inc. $2.870.34 Hardware 5580 Camlll Corp. $4,562.50 Service Agreement 5581 Camp Dresser&Mc Kea Inc. $13,395.00 Engineering Services 5582 Cad Warren&Co. $300.00 Insurance Claims Administrator 5583 Carollo Engineers $8,645.66 Engineering Services M05-24-95 5584 Catapult, Inc. $4,000.00 On-Site Training 5585 Ceneepolme Commercial Int. $16,666.68 Office Furniture For Human Resources Dept. 5586 Century Micro Products,Ina $205.80 Computer Hardware 5587 Century Safety $952.51 Safety Supplies 5588 Cednet $100.00 Computer Services 5569 Charles P.Crowley Co. $121.56 Instrument Parts 5590 Cole-Parmar Instrument Co. $260.91 Lab Supplies 5591 Coleman/Caskey Arohifdcts Inc. $2.810.44 Professional Services JJ8-1 5592 Collins&Airman Fleormverings $8.811.04 Carpet County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 08/06/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 5593 John J.Collins $460.00 Meeting Expenses, 5594 Community Action EAP $950.00 District EAP-July 97 5595 Compuserve Incorporated $757.72 Computer Services 5596 Consolidated Electrical Dist. $1.186.12 Electric Pans 5597 Converse Consultants O C $2,048.10 Consulting Services MO 8.11-93 5598 Cooper Cameron Corp. $1,011.98 Engine Pans 5599 Copelco Capital,Inc. $1,432.00 Color Copier Lease 5600 Core Laboratories,Inc. $1,200.00 Lab Supplies 5601 Corporate Express $5,242.55 Office Supplies 5602 Costa Mesa Auto Supply $4.37 Track Pens 5603 Counterpart Enterprises $88.93 Mechanical Supplies 5604 County of Orange $610.00 Permit Fees 5605 County of Orange $7.080.00 Administrative Processing Fees 5506 County Sanitation Districts $154.05 Retails.Petty Cash 5607 County Wholesale Electric $3,775.71 Electric Parts 5608 Crone Pro Services $1,985.00 Maintenance Agreement 5609 Custom Craft Flooring $3,437.20 Carpet Installation 5610 Cutler-Hammer Inc. $649.10 Equipment Repair 5611 CASA $S50.OD Conference Registration 5612 CEM Corporation $649.14 Lab Supplies 5613 CS Company $583.55 Plumbing Supplies 5614 CS Company $63.36 Plumbing Supplies 5615 CS Company $61.69 Plumbing Supplies 5616 CS Company $91.59 Plumbing Supplies 5617 Day 6 Mae Door Service Inc. $137.00 Fire Door Inspection 5618 Janice Debey $450.00 Meeting Expenses 5619 Digital Equipment Carp. $7,916.15 Office Equipment 5620 Dienes Corporation $62.76 Lab Supplies 5621 Dodge Construction News $192.00 Legal Advertising 5622 Dover Elevator Company $2.130.00 Elevator Maintenance 5623 Dunn Edwards Corp. $73.70 Point Supplies 5624 DGA Consultants $4.725.84 Surveying Services NO 6-8-94 5625 DWG Associates $3.387.98 Professional Services 5626 Eagle Industrial Metals $435.39 Pipe 5627 Enchanter,Inc $8,400.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 5.24-95 5628 ENS Resources,Inc. $1,386.01 Professional Services 5629 Fairbanks Scale,Inc. $480.00 Maintenance Agmemant 5630 Faimwnl Press,Inc. $465.00 Publications 5631 John S.Falkenstein $841.95 Expense Reimb. 5632 First American Title Insurance $450.00 Preliminary Tale Report 5633 Flenda Conveyor 8 Equipment $771.05 Roller Brackets 5834 Fountain Valley Camera $323.14 Photo Supplies 5635 City of Fountain Valley $200.00 Water Use 5636 Fys Electronics $4.555.10 Electronic B Computer Supplies 5637 Furon Company $382.28 Cable 5638 Ganahl Lumber Co. $35.56 Lumber/Hardware County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid OWM97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 5639 Garrett-Callahan Company $2,647.15 Chemicals 5640 Gates Fiberglass Installers $950.00 Storage Tank Inspection 5641 General Electric Company $22,200.00 Electric Parts 5642 General Electric Supply Co. $906.83 Electfk Parts 5643 General Telephone Co. $165.09 Telephone Services 5614 Great American Printing $79.74 Printing 5645 Great Western Sanitary Supply $658.00 Janitorial Supplies 5646 CBS Inc. $167.33 Overpayment Refund 5647 GMF Sound,Inc. $740.00 Calibrate Sound System In Board Room 5648 CST,Inc. $10,358.80 Office Supplies 5649 Harold Primrose her $96.00 Ico For Samples 5650 Harrington Industrial Plastic $1,0511.57 Plumbing Supplies 5651 Hatch 8 Kirk,Inc. $41.43 Track Parts 5652 Haulaway Containers $2.438.00 Container Rentals 5653 Ingrid G.Hellebrand $300.16 Expense Rehm. 56M Hewlett Packard $90.51 Service Agreement 5655 Home Depot $1.143.50 Smell Hardware 5656 City of Huntington Beach 520.54 Water Use 5657 Hyatt lslandie $430.95 Conference Lodging 5658 HB Type 8 Graphica $442.97 Printing %59 Industrial Stream $792.99 Pump Pads 5660 Industrial Hearing 8 Pulmon $1,715.00 OrvSite Audlomeaic Testing 5661 Industrial Threaded Products $101.68 Connedom 5662 Intelligence Press,Inc. $865.00 Subscription 5663 lntemlec Media Products $925.54 Ribbons 5664 Inlemattonal Business Machines $324.00 Maintenance Agmement 5665 Irvine SO-Tech Book $143.15 Publication 5666 lace,Inc. $4,169.93 Instrument 5667 ICMA Distribution Center $124.00 Publication 5668 IDM Controls,Inc. $8.139.17 Generator 5669 law Safety $8.588.63 Safely Supplies 5670 J.D.Edwards $1,400.00 Training Registration 5671 J.P.Morgan Securities $23,011.78 COP Remarkeding 1990-92 Sense 5572 Jay's Catering $402.60 Dlrectoe Meeting Expanse 5673 Johnson Yokogawa Corp. $265.45 Instrument Supplies 5674 Johnstone Supply $1,099.47 Electric Parts 6675 Joint Instrumentation Comm $175.00 Seminar Registration 5676 Term L.Josway $307.13 Expense Reimb. 5677 N.P.Lindstrom,Inc. $5.790.91 Envlr.Consulting Services MO 12.9-90 5678 Kahl ScfentiBc Instruments $236.20 Computer Equipment 5679 Keiser Foundation Health Plan $21.472.90 Medical Insurance Premium for July 97 5680 Keenan Supply $590.21 Welding Supplies 5681 Keler Corporation $995.00 Training Registration M82 Knox Industrial Supplies $432.21 Tools 5683 Knox Industrial Supplies $40.86 Toole 5684 LassrAll Corporation $997.55 Printer Repair County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid OB/06197 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 5685 Law/Crandal,Inc. $1,645.12 Soil Testing MO 7-13-94 5686 League of California Cities $500.00 Membership Dues 5687 Lippincott-Raven $86.00 Publication 5685 Los Angeles Power Association $75.00 Subscription 5689 La Cellular Telephone Co. $59.66 Cellular Telephone Service 5690 M.E.Silberman.Co. $18,274.00 Sewer Repairs 5691 Maintenance Products,Inc. $3,409.94 Mechanical Supplies 5692 Maintenance Technology Corp. $1,406.63 IMre 5693 Managing Automation Software $95.00 Publication 5694 Mar Vac Electronics $157.80 Instrument Supplies 5695 Mc Junkln Corporation $618.14 Plumbing Supplies 5696 McGarry Central $1.271.00 Maintenance Agreement 5697 Donald F.McIntyre $854.91 Expense Reimb. 5698 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. $1.382.71 Tools 5699 Mechanical Drives Co. $176.60 Eleddcal Pads 5700 Meeting Planners Plus $4,000.00 Orange County Fair Coordinator 5701 Mobile Modular Management $344.80 Offica Trailer Lease 5702 Moore Products Co. $1,00244 Valve Pads 5703 Morton Sell $1,231.76 Salt 5704 Motion Industries $34.16 Pump Parts 5705 MPS Photographic Services $254.68 Photographic Services 5708 Nat West Markets $750.00 COP Interest Draw Fees 5707 National Academy Press $41.71 Publication 5700 National Safety Council $5.299.33 Safety Film Rentals 5709 Neal Supply Co. $4,460.56 Plumbing Supplies 5710 Network Catalyst $9,900.00 Consultant 5711 Norco Delivery $99.00 Mail Delivery Service 5712 Norhwestem Carbon $3,284.78 Filters 5713 Office Depot $1,711.11 Office Supplies 5714 Office Pavilion $15.13822 Office Furniture 5715 Robert Oolen $323.57 Expense Reimb. 5716 Oplio Software $9,700.00 Software 6717 Orange County Pump Co. $357.03 Pump Parts 6718 Orange County Wholesale $1,249.92 Instrument Supplies 5719 Orange Valve B Fitiiig $1,2/6.52 Fittings 5720 OC-ASTD $65.00 Membership Dues 5721 Pacific Bell $1,247.72 Telephone Services 5722 Facefoc Mechanical Supply $640.74 Plumbing Supplies 6723 Pacific Parts and Controls $20.36 Instrument Supplies 5724 Padre Janitorial Supply $2,002.88 Janitorial Supplies 5725 Pagenet $628.63 Rental Equipment 5726 Patrick T.Pen $718.47 Expense Reimb. 5727 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. $571.49 Tires 5728 Pads Unlimited $256.92 Truck Pads 5729 Perma Seal $7,873.22 Lube Oil 5730 PBrrey Bowes $331.33 Postage Machine Service Agreement County Sanitation Disbkts Of Orange County Claims Paid OSMS/97 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 5731 PL Hawn Co.,Inc. $122.04 Electric Supplies 5732 Power Electro Supply Co. $80.83 Eledde Supplies 5733 Pryor Resources,Inc. $1,375.00 Seminar Registration 5734 Rancho Auto Wash $233.00 Truck Wash Tickets 5735 Rayvem Lighting Supply $180.56 Miniature Lamps 5736 Relsh Marine Studies,Inc. 3200.00 Ocean Monitoring 5737 Remedy Temp $11,175.53 Temporary Employment Services 6738 Rubin&TuckerAttomeys $24.389.07 Personnel Hearings 5739 IRS Hughs Co.,Inc. $420.41 Paint Supplies 5740 Schnell Publishing $109.00 Subscription 5741 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. $693.16 Specialty Gans 5742 Scott Reilly&Whitehead $10,365.30 Legal Samicas-Personnel Issues 5743 Sementix Corporation $920.07 Mechanical Pads 5744 Shamrock Supply $85.60 Toole 5745 Shureluck Sales&Engineering $1,989.02 Tools/Hardware 5746 Siamon,Larsen&Marsh $5,000.00 Legal Services 5747 Siavms $107.50 Lab Supplies 6748 Sig n"Idrich,Inc. $403.13 Lab Supplies 5749 Smith Pipe&Supply Inc. $1,331.90 Plumbing Supplies 5750 Snap-On Tools Corp. 54,524.42 Tools 5751 Sonic Systems,Inc. $906.00 Computer Pods 5752 So Coast Air Oualfty $6.852.00 Permit Fees 5753 Southern California Trans $1,988.49 Pump Pads 5754 Sprint $288.35 Telephone Services 5755 Sterling Carpet $6.270.00 Carpet Installation 5758 Summit Steel $171.32 Metal 5757 Sunset Ford $107.06 Truck Parts 5758 Super Power Products $1,077.50 Janitorial Supplies 5759 Symms,Inc. $780.00 Consultant 6760 SPC Geotechnlwl,Inc $1,368.45 Claim Settlement 5761 Tekdradics,Inc. $3.110.38 Mechanical Paris 5782 The City Associates,Inc. $12.687.50 Hearing Officer Services 5763 The Unlsource Corporation $730.27 Office Supplies 5764 The Wastewater Connection $68.67 Subscription 5765 Thompson Publishing Group $269.00 Publication 5768 Tony's Lock&Safe Service $269.94 Locks&Keys 5767 Tomell&Cotton $1,348.00 Legal Services 5768 Tri-State Seminar On-The-River $440.00 Seminar Registration 5769 Tropical Pine Nursery,Inc $7,947.88 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5.11-94 5770 Truesdell Labs $336.00 Lab Services 5771 U.S.Fitter $1.262.75 Lab Supplies 5772 Urban Water Institute,Inc. $300.00 Conference Registration 5773 US Equipment Co.,Inc. $1,001.58 Valve Paris 5774 Valley Cities Supply Co. MOM Plumbing Supplies 6775 Vertex $899.77 Office Furniture 5776 Viillaiobos&Associates $17.105.46 Professional Services County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County Claims Paid 081OM7 Check No. Vendor Amount Description 5777 VAR Scientific $765.08 Lab Supplies 5778 Wackenhut Corp. $4.094.16 Contract Servi®-Security Guards 5779 West-Llte Supply Co. $767.18 Electric Supplies 5780 Western Business Systems $606.91 Office Supplies 5781 Western Pacific Alliance Co. $237.00 Equipment Repair 5782 Western Steles Chemical Inc. $13,805.05 Caustic Soda MO 8-23-95 5783 Woodard 8 Curren $13.200.00 Professional Services 5784 Woodward-Clyde Consultants 35,295.00 Professional Services 5785 WEFTEC'97 $585.00 Seminar Registration 5786 WW Grainger,Inc $399.81 Compressor Parts 5787 Xerox Corp. $11.420.14 Copier Leases, 5788 yellow Springs Instrument Co. $124.45 Lab Supplies 5789 Zymark Corporation $2,012.01 Lab Supplies 5790 James E.Cowan $952.34 Expense Reimb. 5791 Edward M.Torres $355.85 Expense Reimb. 5792 John A.Vincent $373.00 Expense Reimb. 5793 Nancy J.Wheatley $787.72 Expense Reimb, 5794 Judith A.Wilson $54.03 Expense Reimb. 5795 Charles F.Winter $506.32 Expense Reimb. 5796 SM111sath Seminar $348.00 Seminar Registration Total Claims Paid OSAW7 $4,5D2,334.53 Summary Amount District No.2 $3,325.84 District No.3 $15,947.13 District No.5 $1,295.56 District No.7 $610.00 District No.11 $10,500.03 CORF $2,942,744.40 Self Insurance Funds $10,365.30 Joint Operations $1,517,545.17 $4,502,334.53 AGENDA Fix Bn Sec L OerH ❑ ccmg.awo.nen+ ITEM O,.`omm'AGnONITEM TRANSMITTAL bon ❑ Jr.SIDS.7ENT❑ Jr.SIDS.WCUSSiON (NON-CONSENT) ❑ PUBUC NEARIND �T.SIDS.MEETING DATE 1f.SIDS.AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.to.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Originator) PDC: POC 310,Penny Kyle,2026 FAHR: FAHR ALL EXEC: EXEC Division No.,Name,a1M Extension STEER: STEER JT.BDs: 0924/97 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS): Adopt Resolution No. 97-31 Revising Districts' Procedures for Settlement of Claims Made Against the Districts; Settlement of Claims Made by the Districts; Collection of Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts; Settlement of Civic or Administrative Actions; and Settlement of Workers Compensation Actions; and repealing Resolution No. 95-112 CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt:NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Dale Notice of Exemption Filed: N/A Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on- CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO4DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES (rm avasw Nu< Tunwnl TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS NIA N/A N/A N/A Schedulell-me Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: ScNMue/Une Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSSUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: Master Plan Estimate: Year of Firs)Costs: �'DD THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PD. CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION?NOT APPLICABLE If YES,able number _Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section RaN.ea deaden, Page 1 of 2 H:\WP.DTAAGENDAWIT"MEPRESOLUTION RE SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMOOC A ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(LM): Originator Dam t. CONCURRENCE Signature Dew ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(t t) D Manager(Or Designee) t. Memorandum from General Counsel dated 7 . 41P14012August 20, 1997 Signature Data Z Proposed resolution De rt H a ( r ti It ) 9 7- Signa a Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) Please refer to the attached memorandum from General Counsel dated August 20, 1997. PK c: Department Head AGM-Operations General Manager R. .7 Page 2 of 2 H\WP.DTAI GENDAt ITS-97,SEPNt ESOLDTION RE SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS.DOC RESOLUTION NO. REVISING DISTRICTS' PROCEDURES FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS: SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE BY THE DISTRICTS, COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS: SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL OR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS: AND SETTLEMENT OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION ACTIONS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING DISTRICT PROCEDURES FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS; SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE BY THE DISTRICTS; COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS; SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL OR ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS; SETTLEMENT OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION ACTIONS; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 95-112 WHEREAS, claims for damages alleging personal injuries, bodily injuries, including death, and damages to real and personal property, are periodically made against the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Districts presently have liability insurance in force with a significant self-insured retention, having previously been self-insured; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have the need for the retention of claims administration services and legal counsel who shall be vested with certain limited authority to accomplish a favorable disposition of claims made against the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have occasion to seek recovery against persons or entities who have caused loss or damage to the Districts, who have been assessed fines, charges, or special fees relating to their use of District facilities, or who have been the subject of civil or administrative enforcement proceedings for violation of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance; and, 200D00D26 49982 1 1 WHEREAS, in the course of conducting the business affairs of the Districts, certain accounts receivable or other obligations owing to the Districts become delinquent, and in fact, uncollectible; and, WHEREAS, cost efficiency relating to collection of delinquent accounts can be greatly improved by the adoption of certain policies relating to the collection of said accounts, and, WHEREAS, claims for worker's compensation damages alleging personal injuries, including death, are periodically made against the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Districts presently have only major stop loss worker's compensation insurance in force, having previously determined to be legally self- insured, and, WHEREAS, the Districts have retained a claims administration service firm and special legal counsel who shall be vested with certain limited authority to accomplish a favorable disposition of worker's compensation claims made against the Districts, and, WHEREAS, cost efficiency relating to resolution of worker's compensation claims can be greatly improved by the adoption of certain policies relating to the resolution of said claims. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: ARTICLE I SETTLEMENT OF LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE AGAINST DISTRICTS Section 1.1: A liability reserve has been established for the payment of claims made against the Districts. Said reserve shall continue to be provided in each annual budget to ensure that sufficient funds are on deposit to provide for payment of those amounts incurred as a liability loss or expense. 1660 26 49903_1 2 W Section 1.2: Each annual budget shall provide, in addition to the reserve established by Section 1.1, for the necessary funds to provide a sufficient balance to meet projected expenses for loss and payment of claims during the ensuing fiscal year. Section 1.3: A claims administration firm is authorized to be retained, and said firm is hereby granted authorization to make payments and settlements of claims made against the Districts in an amount not to exceed $5,000.00 per claimant. Said firm shall be retained in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in an agreement approved by the General Counsel. Section 1.4: A Committee comprised of the General Manager or his designee, Director of Finance, and General Counsel are authorized to review and make full settlement of any claims made against the Districts for contract or liability damages not otherwise covered by insurance by payment of a sum not to exceed $50,000.00 per claimant. In the event a claim results in litigation, which is being legally defended by other than the Districts' General Counsel, this Committee shall review and provide the approval to the Districts' special legal counsel within the same limits. Section 1.5: All claims for damages resulting in a judgment or a recommended settlement by negotiation in an amount exceeding $50,000.00 per claimant, shall be submitted to and approved by the Board of Directors of the Defendant District, or the Joint Boards, in the event of claims made against the Joint Districts. Section 1.6: The General Counsel is authorized to retain the services of special legal counsel for purposes of representing the Districts in the defense of any claim or matter of litigation, whenever it is determined that specialized expertise or experience is desirable, a conflict of interest exists or could arise with the Office of General Counsel, or that the workload of the Office of General Counsel requires the utilization of special counsel. 2000.00028 3 409821 �u ARTICLE II COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT OBLIGATIONS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS Section 2.1: The Director of Finance is authorized to write off as an uncollectible debt any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of 90 days and not exceeding the sum of$1,000.00. Section 22: The Director of Finance, in his discretion, is authorized to assign for collection to a person or firm of his choosing, any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of 45 days and not exceeding the sum of $5.000.00. Ninety (90) days after assigning the obligation for collection, the Director of Finance is authorized to write off as an uncollectible debt any portion of the obligation which is still outstanding. Section 2.3: The Director of Finance, in his discretion, is authorized to file the necessary proceedings in the small claims court of the appropriate judicial district of the County of Orange, in order to collect any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of 45 days and not exceeding the sum of$5,000.00. Upon obtaining a judgment in favor of the Districts, the Director of Finance and General Counsel shall take all legal measures necessary to enforce the terms of the judgment. Ninety (90) days after receiving a final judgment in favor of the Districts, the Director of Finance, with the concurrence of the General Counsel, is authorized to write off as an uncollectible debt, any portion of the obligation which is still outstanding. Section 2.4: Notwithstanding the authority provided in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 above, any obligation owing to the Districts, not exceeding the sum of$50,000.00, may be compromised by acceptance of a sum less than the full amount due or may be written off as uncollectible upon that determination being made, after investigation by a Committee comprised of the General Manager, or his designee, the General Counsel, and Director of Finance. 200P90929 499821 4 Section 2.5: The Director of Finance shall forward any delinquent obligation in excess of $50,000.00 to the General Counsel for the Districts, who shall submit his recommendation to the Boards of Directors as to the method of collection or disposition of said account. Section 2.6: In addition to the above authorization, the Director of Finance is directed to exercise all available lawful methods to ensure prompt and full recovery of all obligations owing to the Districts. Section 2.7: The Director of Finance is authorized to offset against any sums held on deposit by the Districts on behalf of any person or entity who owes a delinquent obligation to the Districts. Section 2.8: The Director of Finance is authorized to withhold the approval of any such permits otherwise to be issued by the Districts to any person or entity who has an outstanding debt obligation owing to the Districts until such time as said debt obligation is paid in full. Section 2.9: Delinquent obligations, as used in this Resolution, shall include any invoice submitted by the Districts for services rendered or for reimbursement of damages caused to District property or personnel, which has not been paid within: (a) The time prescribed by the District Ordinance or Resolution; or (b) Forty-five (45) days, whichever is later, from the date of invoice. ARTICLE III COLLECTION OF FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGES Section 3.1: In the event any fees or charges, up to the amount of$50,000.00, are owed by an Industrial Waste Permittee and are delinquent or in dispute between the Permittee and District, a Committee comprised of the Director of Finance, Director of Technical Services, and General Counsel are authorized to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the Districts, a settlement agreement relating to the financial obligation owing to the Districts. This Section shall not apply to excess capacity charges, nor 2MUDE za 5 49982 1 enforcement actions which are provided for in Article IV below. Said agreement shall be based upon a showing of good cause and a reasonable dispute between the Districts and the Permittee, and can provide for acceptance of a sum less than the full amount claimed as due by the Districts. This agreement may be entered into prior to or during the pendency of any litigation fled by the Districts to collect the amount owed. Section 3.2: Upon written request and establishment of good cause by an Industrial Waste Permittee, the Committee of the Director of Finance, Director of Technical Services, and General Counsel may negotiate and enter into a deferred payment agreement with the Permittee in accordance with the guidelines established herein. Said agreement may be incorporated as part of, or separate and in addition to, any enforcement compliance agreements authorized by the provisions of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance. Section 3.2.1: The installment payment agreement shall be for a maximum term not to exceed 24 months. The agreement shall provide for payment of interest on the principal amount owing at a rate not exceeding the higher of: (a) Ten (10%) percent per annum; or (b) Five (5%) percent per annum, plus the rate prevailing on the 25th day of the month preceding the earlier of: (i) The date of execution of the contract to make the loan or forbearance, or (ii) The date of making the loan or forbearance. (Established by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on advances to member banks under Sections 13 and 13(a) of the Federal Reserve Act (commonly referred to as the "discount" rate).) The agreement shall provide for payment of all costs of preparing and administering the payment agreement, including legal and administrative costs. Section 3.2.2: The agreement shall stipulate the penalties to which the Permittee shall be subjected in the event of nonpayment of any of the payments specified in the agreement, including initiation of legal action or permit suspension or 2W0 00026 d6662_1 6 Y_ revocation, as recommended by the General Counsel and the Director of Technical Services. Section 3.3: If the delinquent obligation is greater than $50,000.00, any compromise settlement or any deferred payment agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the Boards of Directors, who shall prescribe the terms and conditions. ARTICLE IV SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS Section 4.1: In the event the Districts initiate or intend to initiate any civil or administrative enforcement actions based upon alleged violations of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance, a Committee comprised of the Director of Finance, Director of Technical Services, and General Counsel are authorized to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the Districts, a settlement agreement, which may include both payment to the Districts in an amount up to $50,000.00, and enforcement compliance orders deemed appropriate to ensure compliance with the Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance. This agreement may be entered into prior to or during the pendency of any administrative proceeding or litigation enforcement action. Section 4.2: The Committee of the Director of Finance, Director of Technical Services, and General Counsel may negotiate and enter into a settlement agreement which includes a schedule of payments over a period of time not to exceed 24 months, by the person or entity which is the subject of the enforcement action. The agreement shall provide for payment of interest on the principal amount owing at a rate not exceeding the higher of: (a) Ten (10%) percent per annum; or (b) Five (5%) percent per annum, plus the rate prevailing on the 25th day of the month preceding the earlier of: (i) The date of execution of the contract to make the loan or forbearance; or ]WPp6026 4N82 1 v (ii) The date of making the loan or forbearance. (Established by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco on advances to member banks under Sections 13 and 13(a) of the Federal Reserve Act (commonly referred to as the "discount" rate).) Section 4.3: If the proposed settlement involves the payment of an amount greater than $50,000.00, the settlement shall be submitted for approval by the Board of Directors of the involved District or the Joint Boards, in the event of an enforcement action involving the Joint Districts. ARTICLE V SETTLEMENT OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION CLAIMS MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS Section 5.1: A minimum liability reserve has been established in the amount of $250,000.00 for the payment of claims made against the Districts. Said minimum amount shall continue to be provided for in each annual budget to ensure that sufficient funds are on deposit to provide for payment of those amounts incurred as a liability lass or expense. Section 5 2: Each annual budget shall provide, in addition to the reserve established by Section 5.1, for the sufficient funds to provide a sufficient balance to meet projected expenses for payment of claims during the ensuing fiscal year. Section 5.3: A claims administration firm is authorized to be retained, and said firm is hereby granted authorization to make payments and settlements of claims made against the Districts in an amount not to exceed $5,000.00 per claimant. Said firm shall be retained in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in an agreement approved by the General Counsel. Section 5.4: In addition to special legal counsel selected by the Districts' Workers Compensation Administrator, the General Counsel is authorized to retain the services of special legal counsel for purposes of representing the Districts in the defense of any workers compensation claim, wherein he determines that specialized 2ooa 26 6 4"82_1 expertise is desirable or that the workload requires the utilization of outside counsel. Section 5.5: A Committee comprised of the General Manager, or his designee, Director of Finance and General Counsel are authorized to review and make full settlement of any workers compensation claim made against the Districts by payment of a sum not to exceed $25,000.00, in addition to the actual medical expenses and temporary disability payments per claimant. In the event a claim results in litigation, which is being legally defended by other than the District's General Counsel, this Committee shall review and provide the approval to the Districts' special legal counsel within the same limits. Section 5.6: All claims resulting in a recommended settlement by negotiation or stipulation in an amount exceeding $25,000.00, in addition to the actual medical expenses and temporary disability payments per claimant, shall be submitted to and approved by the Joint Boards of Directors. Section 5.7: Resolution No. 95-112 is hereby repealed and made of no further effect. Section 5.8: This Resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held moan 6 9 49982 Faaa 5� D ° N AGENDA ❑ COMM.INFO REM a ❑ coMa.AcraN1 °X ITEM ° JT.BOS CONSENTTRANSMITTAL (NON ❑ JT.9D SENT) N c LONONSENT) ❑ Pll�&/. FIEARING 9 JT.00S.AEETttM DATE RDS.AGENDA ITEM ND. MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Ongmator) PDC: PDC FAHR'. FAHR 2 3720,Joe Rycraw, Extension 5057 EXEC: EXEC STEER STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BIDS:Sept.24, 1997 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: 1. Receive and file petition received from Reza Dadasht of Boulevard Development to annex 7.025 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and County Hills Road in the City of Anaheim. 2. Authorize initiation of annexation of said territory to the District. (Proposed Annexation No.76-Portion of Tract No. 14185 to County Sanitation District No.2). Recommended Action(s): 1. Staff recommends approval of the attached petition initiating proceedings for Annexation No.76-Portion of Tract No. 14185 to County Sanitation District No.2. CEQAREVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD g ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed. Negative Declap lion Approved on NONE Final EIR Apprared on_and Notiu of Determination filed on_ CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES nmlawM qvs To., TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ N/A N/A N/A N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Scltedule/Line Items- AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: N/A ScltedulefUne Item' TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT N/A N/A N/A SODD WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE If YES,slate numtec Permanent Linde i Tenn II YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section n a091W Page 1 of 2 /� /� ATTACHMENTS TO COMMnTEE AGENDA(UsT): S��Y �P �/"3fiLCLI,Lr- 9 4_ 7 1. WA Originator Date CONCURRENCES: �) a Sig re ate D On 18 ( esignee) ��� ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(UV) 1. Pelitionfor Annaiotion Signature- Date 2, tAFC Ann.,MWn Appliealion Short Form. De &OrD&ign a. IAFC atbn Maps T Owner Co�enr Form 1. Annanlfon Map8Legal nsern!F ption Signature Dist Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) Reza Dadashi of Boulevard Development Incorporated would like to Construct the sales models for this tract before completion of the annexation process. He has submitted an application and paid all fees for annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. Processing time for annexations normally is about four months after the matter has been submitted to the Board of Directors for consideration. In order not to inconvenience or delay the applicant's construction plans, subject letter was sent to the City of Anaheim, informing the City that it is within the Districts' policy to proceed with connection of sewers prior to formal annexation completion, as long as all the fees were paid and applications are properly initiated. This proposed uninhabited annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 tax exchange for annexing properties under which the District no longer receives a percentage of basic levy and instead Collects a higher annexation fee. The local sewering agency is the City of Anaheim. The total annexation fee is $30,894.20. RJR:jmf HAWP.DTAUGENDAAITS-9T EPRJRCO2 c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager R.o:nmaa Page 2 of 2 Fw ea.sec.the DnN AGENDA a" ❑ COMA.INFO.REM ❑ cC\MJ ACT REM ITEM ❑ Jr.BDS.�ENMCLISST TRANSMITTAL ❑ Jr.BDB.DISENT) N rp m (NONLONBEN� 1HEARING } JT.SM.MEETING DATE . .BDS.AGENDA REM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.10.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Originator) PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR 2 3720,Joe Rycraw,Extension 5057 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER DNislon No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:SepL 24,1997 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): agenda Wordina: 1. Receive and file petition received from Reza Dadashi of Boulevard Development to annex 7.025 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Road and County Hills Road in the City of Anaheim. 2. Authorize initiation of annexation of said territory to the District. (Proposed Annexation No. 76-Portion of Tract No. 14185 to County Sanitation District No.2). Recommended Action(s): 1. Staff recommends approval of the attached petition initiating proceedings for Annexation No.76-Portion of Tract No. 14185 to County Sanitation District No.2. CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination fled on NONE CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES nil Budget plus Tnnpen) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ N/A N/A N/A N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: N/A SchedulelLine Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AR PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget N/A N/A N/A N/A $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs'. THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AR AMOUNT N/A N/A N/A $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE IIYES,state number Permanent Limited Term It YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Re„„dov,.A7 Page 1 of 2 /� /� n ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Ust): SNta�-cf7 1. NIA Originator Date CONCURRENCES: �F f Sig to ate D Son a ( esignce) ��� ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(lJat) 1. PelNon ror Annexation SignamturrIee,t/-t Date 2 LAFC Annermlion Applloatlon Shon Form. Do l.t Or D 'gn ) 3. LAFO Property Ovmer Consent Form 1. yy 4. Annexation Map&Legal Dewnphon 4r SignaNre D Assistant General Manager(Or Deaignee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background andlor Summary) Reza Dadashi of Boulevard Development Incorporated would like to construct the sales models for this tract before completion of the annexation process. He has submitted an application and paid all fees for annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. Processing time for annexations normally is about four months after the matter has been submitted to the Board of Directors for consideration. In order not to inconvenience or delay the applicant's Construction plans, subject letter was sent to the City of Anaheim, informing the City that it is within the Districts' policy to proceed with connection of sewers prior to formal annexation completion, as long as all the fees were paid and applications are properly initiated. This proposed uninhabited annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 tax exchange for annexing properties under which the District no longer receives a percentage of basic levy and instead collects a higher annexation fee. The local sewering agency is the City of Anaheim. The total annexation fee is $30,894.20. RJR:jmf H1W P.DTAWGENDAW ITS-9TSEPMJR.0 c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager A.ss W Page 2 of 2 PETITION FOR ANNEXATION 1 TO: o of Directors 2 Date: duly 7 , 1997 County y Sanitation District No. P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 I (We), the undersigned landowner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex 7 n2S acres (Grose - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Santa Ana Canyon Rd . Mohler Dr . Country Hill Rd . and Vista Del Sol . (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of Anaheim Hills , more particularly (Indicate city or unincorporated territory) described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and NAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation pr .ceder=r. The sheet address of the property in; Vista Del Sol Lots-13 The reason for the proposed annexation is; New Homes Said property is _inhabited/ x uninhabited. Number of registered voters, if any: D The assessed value of the property in $ 300 ,000 .00 Also enclosed is the JUSTLF/CATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of 5500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: Reza Dadashi Pat Fortner 856 N Commerce Street PO Box 1108 nr"ey CA 92867 Tustin CA 92781 Phone: (714) 997-8657 Phone: (714 550-4550 SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER X ,��x 3D�l�9tr�tJ July 8, 1997 P.O. Box 1108 Pat Fortner Tustin CA 92781 Name (Typed or Printed) X Name (Typed or Printed) ANNIDONSr.4 W4 ZW4 Local Agency Formation Commission Annexation Application Short Form (Annexation of Residential Lots for Sewer Service) This section to be completed by oronerty ownerM Property OwnerName(s) California Mortgage Service Street: .cx t, r ar City, ZIP orange. California 92667 Subject property address if different from above: Street:Lots 1 through 13,Tract$14185 City Anaheim, California Assessors Parcel Number(APN):Q E]E] FI]E E]©E'J 22/ 23. 24 25, 26 427 Is the property within a city? Ye. / No Which? Anaheim Location: identify nearest cross streets: Vista Del Sol and Country Hill Road The reasons] for the proposed annexation (check applicable boxes): ❑ a failed septic system ❑ development of a single family home addition to a single family home ® other(please explain in the space below) Developement of 13 Single Family Homes To be mmnleted by....ring district: Apprmdinma disance for comection: AT THE PROPERTY Li"e JAI C'OLIA-/T.py N/LG RQQD, Does the distict have any special assessments that the amexmg pmpeny will assume upon= mtioa7 Please Explain: NOAiE What is the dimrict's mm mtioa fee? $. .2 (v commtion fee? S 2360 PER.I1NC'GL// U.v/T Is the tmT=y within the districts sphere o influence? Yes [s� No ❑ Is the territory within the sphere of mtluence of a city? Yes a No ❑ Which city?ANAHE/M Curren[Land Use Designation: Cmren R.S-%t Zoning Designtion: - 22. OD O (SC Agency mitrmntim verified by: Name: ✓DE RYCPr1W Tide: PO .t/ 6 ale RSSOC. LOCAL AGENCY FORINIA:TION COMINUSSION Property Owner Consent Form (all legal owners must sign a consent form) 1, California Mortgage Service , consent to the annexation/reorganization of my property located at: Lots 1 through 13, Tract# 14185 as recorded in book 699, Pages 20 through 24 of Map Book of Orange County, California. (or Assessor's Parcel Numbers 556-121- 21,22, 23,24,25, 26 6� 27 ); to the orangp Cniinvy. Sanitation District No 2 District for the propose of providing public sewer service. Signature / `ems � Date May 7. W7 — Mr. Reza Dadashi for Boulevard Development Address 856 North commerce street City, State, 2P Orange, California 92667 GMT' Growth 6lanagement Compat0, -A"ion ofSaeedlm zmenn.Inc. 12362 Beach Bl d.Suite 110 Swsan,CA 90680 (714)281-1400 Fac(714)890-4869 Black 6154 Modules 71,72,81,82 EXHIBIT `A' ANNEXATION NO. 76 (DA 96-17) COUNTY SANITATION LISTRICT NO. 2 That portion of Section 6, Township 4 South, Range 8 West, San 2 Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of 3 California, being a portion of Tract No. 14185, as per map filed in Book 4 699, Pages 20 through 24 inclusive of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of 5 the County Recorder of said County described as follows: 6 7 BEGINNING at a point in the existing boundary line of County Sani- 8 Cation District No. 2 (CSD No. 2) as established by "Annexation No. 69", 9 said point being the intersection of the southwesterly line of said 10 annexation with the southeasterly line of 'Annexation No. 29" to said 11 District, said point also being the most northerly corner of Tract No. 12 14185, THENCE along said existing boundary line per the southwesterly 13 line of said "Annexation. No. 69" and the northerly line of said Tract 14 through the following described courses: South 39°05'29" East, 68.90 15 feet; THENCE South 46"53'19" East, 86.84 feet; THENCE South 81.23.09" 16 East, 646.76 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Tract; THENCE 17 leaving said existing boundary line following along the easterly line of 18 said Tract South 6"37'51" East, 160.97 feet to an angle point- in said 19 existing boundary line of CSD No. 2 as established by "Annexation No. 20 30", said point being the northeast corder of said annexation; THENCE 21 along said existing boundary line per the northerly line of said 22 annexation through the following described courses: South 78009102" West, 23 195.77 feet; THENCE South 89"40'17" West, 100.18 feet; THENCE South 24 89°40117" West, 31.93 feet; THENCE North 79^52140" West, 198.92 feet; 25 THENCE North 77^29'29" West, 242.60 feet; THENCE South 83"17135" West, 26 301.97 feet; THENCE South 40°11.35" West, 195.94 feet to a point in the 27 centerline of Country Hill Road, 40.00 feet wide as shown on the map of 28 said Tract, said canterline being a curve concave northeasterly and 29 having a radius of 300.00 feet, a radial line of said curve through said 30 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT `A' ANNEXATION NO. 76 (DA 96-27) , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 1 point bears South 41-42'21- West, said point also being the intersection 2 of the westerly line of said -Annexation No. 30- with a point on the 3 northeasterly line of -Annexation No. 16- to said District; THENCE 4 Westerly continuing along said existing boundary line, said northeasterly 5 line and said curve through a central angle of 23-S3.39- and an arc 6 distance of 125.11 feet; THENCE tangent to said curve North 24.24'00" 7 West, 204.03 feet to a point in the northwesterly line of said Tract No. 8 14155; THENCE leaving said existing boundary line following along said 9 northwesterly line of said Tract through the following described courses: 10 North 81-33104- East, 188.75 feet; THENCE South 31-16'SS" East, 38.02 11 feet; THENCE:North 43.41142^ East 184.05 feet to a point in said existing 12 boundary line of said CSD No. 2 as established by said ^Annexation No. 13 29"; THENCE following along said existing boundary line per said 14 annexation South 61°05'36" East, 107.56 feet and North 45-2912611 East, 15 207.57 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 16 17 The above described parcel contains 7.025 acres. 18 19 Attached and made a part hereof is a map designated as EXHIBIT `B' . 20 21 22 23 24 25 This proposal does meet the, approval 26 of he Orange County Surva is Office. 27 28 Date thiLspt- day o 6.iL.' 1997 29 30 31 C Co y Surveyor �y\��Pl.CgN�D�SG9 32 My license expires 09/30/97 33 34 ¢ No.4408 y 35 * Fxp,9130197 3637 Q4�iFCJ.'11Q'✓ 4} PAP B`al`"�- A�OFC 39 AUFO �/ . 0 40 fQ 'M- 26492 a �l�lFOF (7149 412-12,1j Page 2 of 2 tXHIlBII "B" .ANNEXATION No. 7fa CDA 9(o-173 Y BL'OCK G154 TO COUNTY SANFTATION DISTRICT Na. 2 MDDULE 71,77,1I,tl QpOFESSIpy CITY OF ANAMM.,�y. 2 492 SEC `D T4° RS1N SBYI a ATF OF C L i a Z.ZA1 4, 63. IBoZ,sa, �'2� OFlRl4lfly Nql RAO �k'1� NE'lY LINE OF �18445, q2 E' ' ANNEY.NC16 SQ, SW4.Y t SPLY j95 �Q Sd E Ip LINES OF ANNEX P`s40e •94 7sA,-; IANNEX� +'l9 ll3S, t ANNEX. ANUEX. �'\� ;'!l'NO �1 N0. 16 No. 30 POit t y�a� Ngfe7f7'1 \� _ N'LYUNE) TR 14115 - - 0FANNEXP30 s (MB6cm- . tcNTY r3 8'M B'Cr Ak s 5 z 7R 14195EOF /✓ 46°S� 9�t G9$?p. �1 1 d6 84. w a NO.4408 Dy s l 1 s * EXP.WOW * a~ 1 s I R'LY LINE of 1 oPCAUF , ANxex *30 ,C:A1VU&X. S99840'17''W 31.93' - - EYIMNS DISTRICT DDUNDARY l_ UNE•�`� \ 1 Na. lag MAMEM M! 80UHDA4y \ S 89040'17RW 100•lE'j- �� NE'LY l9R 1 190 OF TR 141IS 9 \ E'LY LINE Os\ 1 ANNEY.AN.11 ANNEK. N,.� c j \� 14115 �\ S. )_ THl %I 0 MEET7R APDKDVAL DD o2 TH DlUNGE UN Y SURVEY01+(S OFFICE ��� It�SL°37'SI^E I60.17' DA 0 1 Y (IF M � wl ' `IN tL60R OFI X14W 530 PREPARED Ay' J"tJ CANAi UUN URVE AR80EEALANK ja%4" lCENSE EMPIRES 913O19'7 CM631-1243 EIP WWD - AGENDA b ❑ ITEM CoNm ACTION ❑ JT BIDS.CONSENT TRANS MITTAL ,�= ❑ JT.BOB.DiSCUSSION tNON-CONSENT) ❑�) HEARING H BINS.MEETViO DATE _If JT.BDS.AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.to.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS OMTS (Originator) PDC: POC 310.Penny Kyle,2026 FAHR: FAHR EXEC: EXEC 5 Division No.,Name,and Ertension STEER: STEER JT.BDS: 0924/97 RECOMMENDED ACTIONISI: 1. Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Breach of Contract, Wal-Con Construction Co. v. County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 782457, in connection with Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5.37-3; and 2. Authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt:NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTIONONTHISSPECIFICREM: Date Notice of Exemption Fred, N/A Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on final NO"of Determination fled on CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-0ATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-0ATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES a-,e,.qw nae Ini TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS N/A N/A NIA N/A Sche lule/Lina Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: ScheduleJLine Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: Master Plan Estimate: $0.00 Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO. CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION?NOT APPLICABLE If YES,slatenumber: _Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section R. Minna? Page 1 of 2 H 9WPGTAAGENDAVJTS-9TSEMWALCON SUMMONS.DOC ATTACHMENTS TO COMMTrrEE AGENDA(List): Origi or Date 7. CONCURRENCES: Signature Date ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(Dat) Dhal Meneger(Or Designee) 7. Memorandum from General Counsel dated �- � .� 4 September 8, 1997 Signa%, d 9 Date Oepa ( r sign 4/— s n re ate Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) The Summons and Complaint was received by the District on September 2, 1997. Please refer to the attached memorandum from General Counsel dated September 8, 1997. PK c: Department Head AGM-Operations General Manager Rm o 7 Page 2 of \\LEAD\➢ATA2\WP.DTAIAGENDA\AITS-97\SEP\WALCON SUMMONSDOC Fm IRL sea.Ilse OmN AGENDA ❑ CO T❑ CONN.ACTION IE M ITEM ❑ JT.S DBDS.CDNSEI TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT. DS. GDBS:aILYI b o (NONCONSENT) ❑! P�UBLLIIIC,�HEANNG 7Y/JT.8DS.MEETING DATE A JT.BM.AGENDA REM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.to NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Originator( PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR 7 3720,Joe Rycraw, Extension 5057 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:Sept.24,1997 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wording: 1. Receive and file petition from William Deutsch and five other property owners to annex 4.17 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of Foothill Boulevard and East Lemon Heights Drive in the Lemon Heights area. 2. Authorize initiation of annexation of said territory to the District. (Proposed Annexation No. 152 Deutsch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Recommended Action(s): Staff recommends approval of the attached petition initiating proceedings for annexation No. 152-Deutsch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved an None Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination filed on CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT T043ATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES pca.r�......- rr..:,.51 TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ NIA N/A N/A NIA SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Schedule/Une Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: NIA Schedulell-ine Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGETCHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AM PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: NIA N/A N/A $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AM AMOUNT NIA NIA N/A $0.00 Rerseaoanea7 Page 1 of 2 H:\W P.DTAWGENDAVJTS-9T15EPViJR.001 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE UYES,stelenumber _^Permanent _Umned Term If YES,esplaln In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION seonon 9 7 1. WA ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(LJet): Originat/o/'r R~Agy.7—� Date CONCURRENCES: Sign re at D OnM ta,9! gnee) / �J ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(Del) 9--� /q / 1. Petition for annexation Signature Date 2. LAFC Annexation short form D the (Or, ee 3. LAFC properly miner consent farm C 4. Annexationmap and legal descnpilon 5. Loner to County of orange Sig nature Dale Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) This annexation consists of five individually owned inhabited single family residences; and one under construction. • William Deutsch at 2086 S.E. Foothill Boulevard • Robert Pearson at 2121 S.E. Foothill Boulevard • James Bear at 2102 La Cuesta Drive • Fred L. Walker at 2122 La Cuesta Drive • Jane Vaughn at 2052 La Cuesta Drive • Walter Ward at 2012 La Cuesta Drive The Deutsch's are constructing a new single family home at 2086 Foothill Boulevard. They, as well as the five other owners, have submitted an application and paid all fees for annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. Processing time for annexations normally is about four months after the matter has been submitted to the Board of Directors for Consideration. In order not to inconvenience or delay the applicants construction plans, a letter was sent to the County of Orange on July 7, 1997 informing the county that it is within the District's policy to allow property owners to proceed with the connection of sewer prior to formal annexation completion, as long as all fees are paid and applications are properly initiated. This proposed inhabited annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 tax exchange for annexing properties under which the Districts no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and instead collects a higher annexation fee. The local sewering agency is County Sanitation District No. 7. Total annexation fee is $18,759,94. RJR:jmf H oNP.DTAtAGENDAtAITS-9MEIxRJR.001 c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager ae.e•a�,� Page 2 of 2 H:\WP.DTAWGENDAW ITS-9715EPIRJR.001 PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO: Board of Director. Date: �' .C� 7 County Sanitation District No. P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 I (We), the undersigned landowner(s) , do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex TOTAL 4 , 17 acres (Grose - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of (Indicate adjacent street intersectionor area description) in the city of �O.wr, p l" .a \Clk.�A-`�/ more particularly ( n eats c ty or un ncorporate Cerr tory) described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and W enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the Dietrlet'a annexation procedures. The street address of the property is: ZOfil- The reason for the proposed annexation in ' _'SeatCCuut¢-t,e.3 `I'H2 Said property Se _inhabited/ •!uninhabited. Number of registered voters, . if anys IF-- The aeeeeeed value of the property in $ /02. &5-Z Also enclosed is the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL OUESTIONNAIRE required by the Local Agency Formation commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of S500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT_PROCESSING FEE. Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the followings W ,2'-1:)z.L7 s,,' 1+�43.ou �E.4)0� 524.9'Z Phones �S� '6�/ 5- Phone: SIGNAIM or7 WNE DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER 3 7 Z7g/z77GrR 7 ame (Typed or Printed) Name (Type or r me ) ANMX#AST.{ Dsavaa Local Agency Formation Commission Annexation Application , Short Form (Annexation of Residential Lots for Sewer Service) This section to be completed by nmerty owner(,) Property Owner Name(s) GL)F-Fn?i r � Q40—IT C4 Street: =%s . ` �c r:o, it•, 9W A City,ZIP '>Fl N ft !A r) ZC 60 Subject property address if different from above: Street: City Assessors Parcel Number(APN): D0❑ El LJ 0©2 Is the property within a city? Yes C14o Wltieh? Location: identify nearest cross streets: C i ; er A +c . Nr- 7-r1 . The reasons] for the proposed annexation (check applicable boxes): ❑ a failed septic system development of a single family home ❑ addition to a single family home ❑ other(please explain in the space below) To be completed by annesine district: Approximate distance for connection: 220 Er Does the district have any special assessments that the ame rng property will asnme upon annexation? Please Explaia No,vE what is the districts amatation fm? S i2 •cormxtion fee? s 2350 Is the territory within the districts sphere of influence? Yes L�T No ❑ Is the territory within the sphere of mflumce of a city? Yes❑ No Qr Which city? Current land Use Designatiow—rZA/ GL E FAlli� Y ,CG S/!JE/VT/AL Current Zoning Designation: .2'/ Agency information verified by: Name: JOE R-Y6eAW Tide: P.E//J6 E,VG/.VEEP G ASSOC , Attachment A >r ;I LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Property Owner Consent Form > (all legal owners must sign a consent form) .7/�(i�i [' . l Z-c.7 f , consent to the annexation/reorganization of my paopaty located at -� G L �-'C`ipxe hll/D. SANTH ANA , CA . 92705 (or Assessor's Parcel Numbers 50 2 —351 — 05 ), to the Myl-Jry JW17,4 rlew District for the purpose of providing public sewer service. Signature Date Address 'Gs176-2, City, State, ZIP -)A t i L 4 C" t Attachment B ` PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO: Board of Directors Date: 8 z- LI County Sanitation District No. 7 P.O. Box 8127 - ' Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 I (We), the undersigned landowner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex /•(g0 acres (Grose - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Lein o A.) N e( rS 0O lyt 4 C.17 C4,�Tl 7WVE (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of (JN/N C y(Lpp 2L3Te0 RCA?tl � , more particularly (Indicate city or un ncorpozata Yerritory) described and shown on the LEGAL. DESCRIPTION and NAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The street address of the property is: 02 I O*�-- L- rA (y 'LL'T A The reason for the proposed annexation is: '70 LA Lc 1, 7- rC /v.:wPcno -J or- weArykeo2/ c SCwc/z . Said property is inhabited/_uninhabited. Number of registered voters,• if any: �?- I The assessed value of the property is 8 ZS(ei S5 3 Also enclosed is the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL ODESTIONNAIRE required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of S500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: =4MES (2I FP'FL 2) b Z L!rk C��l"Crt/a S�N'TLF RN �� rn C/270f Phone: 7I4- 7Z1-2 c(o Phone: G P OWNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER 8 2y � 7 �( �d t n C-Ue'-rr�) aMeS �• �3err}ft- Sa,�-„a L},.�F# cA G,Z7a,� emetf(�or Prince) Nimes ( r Pr t ) ANNFXRNST.t OOR2A0 v Local Agency Formation Commission Annexation Application Short Form (Annexation of Residential Lots for Sewer Service) This section to be completed by Property owner(s) Property OwnerName(s) P�f Street: J l o Z L (7k GU eSTr—� City,ZIP S 3 yr q t f_A -I 2'7-,— Subject property address if different from above: Street: City Assessors Parcel Number(APN): S❑❑� © Q 3Q Q Q Is the property within a city? Yes/ No Which? Location: identify nearest cross streets: lu ew Pvrc r 4 The reason[s] for the proposed annexation(check applicable boxes): ❑ a failed septic system ❑ development of a single family home ❑ addition to a single family home ❑ other(please explain in the space below) —ra �9$S/ST n�u ti� 6ez( i �J C . A,)Cc.�7,.-y To be completed by annesin¢district: Approximate distance for corn lion: 400 FT Dar the district have any special esses9pents that the aancong Imo— wf➢assume upon annexation? Please Explain: NONE What is the district's annexation fee? S 3�82 AC.. connection fce? s Z35o Is the territory within the dismoes sphere ofinduence7 Yes [ir No ❑ Is the territory within the sphere ofinfl=w ofacity? Yes❑ No []� Whicheity7 .. Current land Use Designation: S7/✓GLE FAM/LY RF.SY/.1ENT/AL, Crrrrm Zoning Designation —/ Agency information verified by: Name: JOE RYCeAIN Tide PRIM EAVJ^/BER.6 A5510e, Attachment A LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Property Owner Consent Form (all legal owners must sign a consent form) I SAMeS 3 GZ7,Y-Z- , consent to the annexation/reorganization of my property located at: '21oZ LA Ly e6?1�� SR"'Ty:4 A-N 4, U r/ Z7 oS (or Assessor's Parcel Numbers S o Z - 33 Z - 01 ), to the 5 aN a n a District for the purpose of providing public sewer service. Signature Date Address o a L/a Lug I-f:a City, State, ZIP '�(Z-7 0 S� Attachment B PETITION FOR ANNEXATION ((( p TOx Board of Directors Date: County Sanitation District No. P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 I (We), the undersigned landowner(e), do hereby request that proceedings be taken t0 annex Vi &CA.L* acres (Grose - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located In the vicinity of LEMON NEIC14T5 QiC/VF' 1-.,4 CUE57A- AeivE" (Indicate adjacent street intervention or area description) in the city of Jam' q,�/� [' lJ.V 7'Y , more particularly (In cat. city or uiincorporate tern tory) described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the Dietriet'epannexatio�n p-r^o../ee�durepe. The street address of the property is: .7, 1 �, ,{� (�,rtGNl(,/b�A • p Q . . The reason for the proposed annexation is: .5EWEk°- CONWEj'T/!JN Said property in t/ inhebited/_uninhabited. Number of registered voters, if any: 6ltio _ The assessed value of the property is $ h40o> Also enclosed is the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL OUESTIONNAIRE required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of S500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: ) n a �flr Phone:cs �• Phone: 012ELTW OF LMOWI DATE 'SIiGMP ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER e( [ ) k / ems (Type or Pr me )e ►A Z Name (Typed Or Printed) AMAVMSZI OI/22A1I Local Agency Formation Commission Annexation Application Short Form (Annexation of Residential Lots for Sewer Service) This section to be cam leted bv onnerryowner(s) Property Owner Name(s Street: City, ZIP a b� Subject property address if different from above: Street: City s o k 3 3� o Assessors Parcel Number(APN): Q 0® 0 0 0 0 Q Is the property within a city? Yes/ N,o ch? Location: identify nearest cross streets: Yiff , The reason[sj for the proposed annexation(check applicable boxes): ❑ a failed septic system ❑ development of a single family home ❑ addition to a single family home ❑ other(please explain in the space below) To be mmnleted by enn-xine district: Appmaimamdistao«formmectos 590 FT- Does the district have any special asscsstnm,•that the=cxmg property will assume upon amexaton? Please Explain: Al2NE What is the district's annexation f«a S 396 co®ection f«1 a 2350 Is the territory within the district's sphere of influence? Yes [2� No ❑ Is the territory within the sphere of influence of a city? Yes❑ No ER' Which city? — CunentlandUseDesignatim S/NGLE FA 1-7 )1 ,CE51A1EN FIAL- Current Zoning Designator R.-/ Agency information verified by: Name: JOE. RYCRAW Title: 89-W, E/JG/NGER'G ASSOC, Attachment A LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Property Owner Consent Form (aR legal owners must sign a consent form) I, kn consent to the annexation/reorganization of my property located at: _ Ala A (or Assessor's Parcel Numbers o Z- 3 3 a-Oa ), to the C0111Vry -SAN/TAT/O/✓ District for the purpose of providing public sewer service. Signatu Date � Address c a a /.iL n,4,� - C 9 G City, State, ZIP C1Mu, Attachment B PETITION FOR ANNEXATION b M. Board of Directors ,.,r Date: / - 3 -27 County Sanitation District No. P.O. Box 8127 Fountain valley, CA 92728-8127 I (We), the undersigned landowner(e), do hereby request that proceedings, be taken to annex 7Oracres (Grose - to nearest hunc)iedt'D�,'�) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of (-p LJY'y Y�£C+•PFO (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of � more particularly (I1- �„rt � unineorpo to territory) described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and M enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the Distriet•a annexation procedures. The street address of the property is,: 2( Z/ `3 •F �^��cH�.,�`blJa• . The reason for the proposed annexation in: 'J'it Ties �y Said property is _inhabited/_uninhabited. Number of registered voters, If any: '7, - The assessed value of the property is S 334 476 a Also enclosed is, the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL OUESTIONNAIRE required by the Local Agency Pormation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of S500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following. �7C2 F_ - /7,- ST. r/A/ rlr 4.2(WGl Phone: -7;y . •j y�J•�J�L•L� Phone: SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER 7 -3 q) ��i�/ S.iz. FQA>i�us da. Rry B`LaA GGL �,J�� CLG7L alai Sf'F70-r#1"- i fClt.�^SD P, 7 3 .97 �9N?CL �Lk.4, N e (Type o� r P�t3) ANNFXrINST.4 0 /22r94 Local Agency Formation Commission Annexation Application Short Form (Annexation of Residential Lots for Sewer Service) This section to be completed by Property owner(s) Property OwnerName(s) Pt".91 J?AJ Street: 19 ?a? S . F . E,,0Mfi« Ta G'D . City,ZIP _fZ9A&7M /+3A/47 Subject property address if different from above: Street: ���� City a c Assessors rsl h,umbcr(F rm,TE ED E I 17.31T, 22T, Is the property within a city.? Yes/ 6 which? Location: idat*nearest cross streets: I—A 4,rmCd- /f�� &ui(( The reasons] for the proposed annexation(check applicable boxes): 0 a failed septic system ❑ development of a single family home ❑ addition to a single family home ❑ other(please explain in the space below) ' To be comnkted by rypnejtnngAsWcn Approximate distmce for mnnecbm 570 FT,. Does the district have any special assessments that the annexing property sell e.m,,.,.upon anoamtlon? Plmw Explam: NONE Wbat is the districts emexetim fce? S 7L�r„ connection fa?❑5�350 Is the tepitory wiWin the district's sphee of infimmce? Yw Q No Is the=mS'and in the sphere of mfiuence of s city? Yes❑ No a Which city? Cunent lmd Use Desi�tetion: .5/N4Cc' FAM/LY .eES%OE.VT/AG. Cunwt Turing Desigatim: RJ Agmey information verified by: Name: ✓OE RYC.eAW Title: PIP/N, E'.VG.VE,Q6 ASSOC, Attachment A LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Property Owner Consent Form (all legal owners must sign a consent form) I � i�i✓z ,.%. �u9/kC1 L; consent to the annexation/reorganization of my property located at: _ 212/ S. FooTj//LL_84-VO_ _ �SANrA A.VA,, eA `/2705 (or Assessor's Parcel Numbers J502 •3 32 -6 .9 ), to the C'Odn/ty sAl%ll TAT/oAl District for the purpose of providing public sewer service. Signatur� C -) Date 7 29 . 96 Address .2,jA S. !c . r067R/Z._ City, State, ZlP_ 1S,gA,7)9 /9,tII9 C// 9;2)6l Attachment B PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TOt Board of DirectorsDate: an 97 cl County Sanitation 7 District No. P.O. Eox 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 I (we), the undersigned landowner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex TOTAL µ. , kr7 acres (Grose - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of ,1L „1, \1 Ac L. Q,..a., (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of , more particularly ( n gate c ty r unanc rate territory) described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and LAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The street address of the property is: The reason for the proposed annexation is: czm:.'•^'L�v•0 An �. Said property is inhabited/­uninhabited. Number of registered voters, if any: .7, The aeeeseed value of the property in $ *dgS-_ CG:� Also enclosed is the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of S500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the fo`'llowing$ 2t;rsZ_ CSO TsTr.u.Ca 9tc.fs'O - �, 7CLS Phone: 737->O Sri Phone: -� SIGNATURE OF LANDONNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER SANE Vl of 1 red Name (Typed Printed) time ) R Name (Typed or Printed) ANNOIANST.4 04/22/94 Local Agency Formation Commission Annexation Application Short Form (Annexation of Residential Lots for Sewer Service) This section to be completed by property owners) Property Owner Name(s) Qctua, 0 Street `Q�cauLt�n,� " �-mS2 �C�.� a City, ZIP Q.�.,:$0.__1_�dyq— _ Q1:9 C � Subject property address if different from above: Street: City Assessors Parcel Number(APN): ®[E][E a ®❑� © �5 O Z 3S 2—OS Is the property within a city? Yes No Which? _ Location: identify nearest cross streets: a"bQ The reason[s] for the proposed annexation (check applicable boxes): ❑ a failed septic system ❑ development of a single family home ❑ addition to a single family home ❑ other (please explain in the space below) SD To be be completed by ennesine district: Approximate distance for connection: / 2 O F]7 Does the district have any special assessnenms that the annexing property will assume upon annexation? Please Explain: NOnc What is the district's annexation fee? $3952/AC. comcction feel $ 2350 Is the territory within the district's sphere of innuence7 Yes Q No ❑ Is the territory within the sphere of intlumoc of a city? Yes❑ No a Which city 1 Currenlland Use Designation: S{,VGLE FAM/�Y RF_Si/)ENT/AL_ Current Zoning Designation: R/ Agency information verified by: Namc: sA2E R Z-9/1 W Tide:PR//,/, ,QY506, Attachment A LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Property Owner Consent Form (all legal owners must sign a consent form) I, W ' consent to the annexation/reorganization of my prop located at: aZ 5 2 fig—) Q j# G It�n (or Assessors Parcel Numbers SO Z-352-0 b d- S67 - ? -0 5), to the 610y vT Y SA/J/TAr1e9AI District for the purpose of providing public sewer service. Signature �m,o�� Date C. Address �52 �iio City, State, ZIP QItiCJ Q2rb o5 Attachment B PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TOs Board of Director. Date: County Sanitation District No. 7 P.O. Be. 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 I (We), the undersigned landowner(e) , do hereby request that proceedings be TOT� taken to annex 4, 17 acres (Grose - to nearest hunt/h) of�\{e�rrit. ory a 1 VI Vf \VL�tt_.N.to the District located in the vicinity of {-p (Indicate adjacent at r t intersection or area description) in the city of >�-'c� L1.N AM Nz� ' more particularly (Indies tec9ity or incorporated territory) described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and MBE enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District1 annexation procedures. The street address of the property iss Z-� q , `�f) The reason for the proposed annexation iss Sam n "A Said property is _inhabited/_uninhabited. Number of registered voters, if any: L The assessed value of the property is 5 Z.3 7�IPSO Also enclosed is the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of SS OO.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and communications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: � EN WAND 2 1vR Phones �Z — Z�S:/ Phone: S11GNATURE OF LABDMEM DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER HIV /1CZiQ 1 at Art, Name ( or t ) x Nara (Typed or Printed) ANNEMNST.1 04122J9C Local Agency Formation Commission Annexation Application Short Form (Annexation of Residential Lots for Sewer Service) This section to be completed by property owner(s) /t Property Owner Name(s) J�"e/.p �Zfi CRecy.V `,/,vaev Street: 1-2 Ld frietr.�o city, zrP Two .4,; 9a zw Subject property address if different from above: Street: City Assessors Parcel Number(APN):©RI E 919 Q❑� Is the property within a city? Yes/® Which? Location: identify nearest cross streets: Fa�.,�.bli« —Lt veN ".B The reason[s] for the proposed annexation(check applicable boxes): ❑ a failed septic system ❑ development of a single family home ❑ addition to a single family home ❑ other(please explain in the space below) S�� r3.e /c/aoi[ uf� To be completed by annexing district: Approximate distsoce for connection: 40 FT• Does the district have my special assesanents that the atmetdng property will assume upon annexation? Please Explain: NONE what is the dismers non=stion fee? s 3 2 C,connection fee? s 2350 Is the territory within the districts sphere of influence? Yes US No ❑ Is the territory within the sphere of influence of a city? Yes❑ No [`}, Whichaty? — Current Land Use Desigaation: 5'i/./CLE FAMte Y RES/.tJENT/AL Current Zoning Designation: R.. Agency information verified by: Name: ✓OE RYC.EAW Tide: P.J"' E.V4/n/EEP 4 ASSOL� Attachment A LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Property Owner Consent Form (all legal owners must sign a consent form) , consent to the annexation/reorganization of my property located at: n .'� �/ 6 C✓ESrA D.P. N 5rvorA /4Ki¢ (or Assessor's Parcel Numbers -CO-A - 3 S.. - O 3 ), to the C'OU,vey .SA.vi r.4 r/o!J District for the purpose of providing public sewer service. Signature U)Q�N" Date -] - 22- 94 Address 2,0 12 L a 0L.,t m a t City, State, ZIP QAe1 . 9 g 7 O S Attachment B 1 Block: 5853 2 Modules: 24&25 3 4 EXHIBIT"A" 5 ANNEXATION NO. 152—DEUTSCH ANNEXATION (DA 96-04) 6 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 7 8 PARCELI: 9 That portion of that certain land in the Unincorporated Territory of the County of Orange, State 10 of California,being Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 87-349,as shown by the map recorded in book 275, 11 pages 18 and 19 of Parcel Maps, on file in the office of the County Recorder of said County, more 12 particularly described as follows: 13 Beginning at an angle point in the existing district boundary of Orange County Sanitation 14 District No.7 as established by"Annexation No. 71-A Portion of Tract No. 9615"(Annexation No. 71) 15 to said District,said angle point being the Easterly terminus of that certain course described as"North 16 84°33'06" East, 199.18 feet"in said Annexation No. 71; 17 Thence along said existing district boundary per Annexation No. 71, South 84"11'00" West, 18 19.74 feet to the Southwesterly comer of Parcel 1 of said Parcel Map 87-349; 19 Thence leaving said existing district boundary and along the boundary of Parcel 1 of said Parcel 20 Map 87-349,North 5"49'00" West, 15.00 feet; 21 Thence North 14"36'00" East, 154.39 feet to a point in said existing district boundary of said 22 Orange County Sanitation District No.7 as established by"Annexation No.96-Horn" (Annexation No. 23 96)to said District,said point being 11.94 feet Westerly from the Easterly terminus of that certain course 24 described as"North 84°02'50" West, 148.23 feet"in said Annexation No. 96; 25 Thence along said existing district boundary per Annexation No.96,South 84'05'47"East, 11.94 26 feet; 27 Thence South 34°54'07"East 308.81 feet to the Southeasterly comer of Parcel 2 of said Parcel 28 Map 87-349; Page 1 of 4 I EXHIBIT"A" 2 ANNEXATION NO. 152—DEUTSCH ANNEXATION (DA 96.04) 3 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 4 5 Thence leaving said existing district boundary and along the boundary of Parcel 2 of said Parcel 6 Map No. 87-349,South 28"24'49" West 162.27 feet; 7 Thence South 50"4T23" West 15.00 feet to a point in said existing district boundary of said 8 Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 as established by "Annexation No. 57 - Tract No. 8295 9 (Recorded)" (Annexation No. 57)to said District,said point being 39.13 feet Southeasterly along and 10 from the Northwesterly terminus of that certain course described as"South 39'01'35" East 106.08 feet" 11 in said Annexation No. 57; 12 Thence along said existing district boundary per Annexation No. 57, Noah 39"12'37" West 13 39.13 feet' 14 Thence North 23024'51"West 37.04 feet m an angle point in said Annexation No. 71,said angle 15 point being the Southeasterly terminus of that certain course described as`South 23°12'13"East, 196.32 16 feet"in said annexation; 17 Thence along said existing district boundary per Annexation No. 71, North 23°24'51" West 18 196.32 feet to the Point of Beginning. 19 20 The above described parcel of land contains 0.97 acres,more or less. 21 22 PARCEL 2: 23 That portion of that certain land in the Unincorporated Territory of the County of Orange, State 24 of California, being Lots 6 through 11 inclusive of Tract No. 670, as shown by the map recorded in 25 Book 20,pages 40 and 41 of Miscellaneous Maps,together with Parcel 2 of a parcel map recorded in 26 Book 104, pages 27 and 28, all on file in the Office of the Comity Recorder of said County, more 27 particularly described as follows: 28 Page 2 of 4 1 EXHIBIT"A" 2 ANNEXATION NO. 152—DEUTSCH ANNEXATION (DA 96-04) 3 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 4 5 Beginning at an angle point in the existing boundary line of Orange County Sanitation District 6 No.7 as established by"Annexation No.96-Hom"(Annexation No.96)to said District,said angle point 7 tieing the Easterly terminus of that certain course described as South 84002'50"East 157.55 feet"in said 8 Annexation No.96; 9 Thence following along said existing district boundary per Annexation No. 96,South 84'05'47" 10 West, 157.60 feet; I I Thence North 58045'57" West 62.72 feet; 12 Thence North 32°00'49" West 9.02 feet to an angle point in said existing district boundary per 13 "Annexation No. 108-Mahoney" (Annexation No. 108) to said District, said angle point being the 14 Westerly terminus of that certain course described as "South 87055'55" West, 95.04 feet" in said 15 Annexation No. 108; 16 Thence along said existing district boundary per said Annexation No. 108,North 88°00'46"East, 17 95.03 feet; 18 Thence North 73"1749"East 93.00 feet; 19 Thence North 12"1217" West 48.74 feet; 20 Thence North 25"35'21" East 20.00 feet; 21 Thence South 64°24'39" East 193.68 feet; 22 Thence North 58020'13" East 110.00 feet to an angle point in the centerline of La Cuesta Drive, 23 as shown on said Tract Map No. 670; 24 Thence leaving said existing district boundary along the centerline of La Cuesta Drive, South 25 28°0327" East 404.65 feet to the intersection of the centerline of said La Cuesta Drive and the 26 Northwesterly prolongation of the Northeasterly line of Lot 6 of said Tract No. 670; 27 Thence along said Northeasterly line and its Northwesterly prolongation, South 35°41'47" East 28 90.00 feet; j Page 3 of 4 1 EDIT"A" 2 ANNEXATION NO. 152—DEUTSCH ANNEXATION (DA 96-04) 3 TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 4 5 Thence along the Southeasterly line of said Lot 6 South 61"5849" West 196.52 feet to a point 6 in said existing district boundary of said Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 as established by said 7 Annexation No. 96,said point being 79.74 feet Southeasterly from the Northwesterly terminus of that 8 certain course described as"South 51*47108" East 239.75 feet' in said Annexation No. 96; 9 Thence along said existing district boundary per Annexation No.96 North 51°52'07"West 79.74 10 feet; 11 Thence North 340507" West 423.22 feet to the Point of Beginning. 12 13 The above described parcel of land contains 3.20 acres,more or less. 14 15 All as shown on a map attached to and made a part hereof,designated as EXHI BIT"B". 16 17 This legal description was prepared under my direction and was compiled from record data. I8 _ Q 19 By: RWss/pNq�0 TOR Noel W.Torke son,RCE 15308 20 ;c, 21 Date: / 9 6 (# No 3� 97 iF fj 22 This proposal does meet the approval CIVILOF of the Orange County Surveyor's Office for 23 John Comas, County Surveyor 24 Dated thisW-6day ofJL20p, 19%. e�%.Am 25 26 By: "`r�� Y FI(.w».�«.o� § ao.wnnn Michael B. Emmons,P.L.S. 5899 ,� WLSMW 27 Deputy County Surveyor +� My license expires 12/31/96 of o 28 WpMnWQui-u Page 4 of 4 COUNTY jANITATION DISTRICTS OF DRA,JGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r July 7, 1997 plmna: f71419522411 W. E. Eckles, Manager ouuE,o4Lreea: Building Inspection Division/SCRB a0. Bo.8127 Environmental Management Agency �,wuty,c4 County of Orange 2272ea127 P. O. Box 4048 even'a fi as: Santa Ana, CA 92702.4048 1 GB44 Blis Avewa 92 Fcw� Velma,C4 Bz7oB701e SUBJECT: Proposed Annexation No. 152 Duetsch Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 This will inform your office that William Deutsch has submitted an application and paid Mamear all fees for annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 for approximately 4.17 acres Agaacea of property located at • 2062 Foothill Boulevard otiaa 2121 Foothill Boulevard 2052 La Questa Anahaln, 2012 La Questa eras 2122 La Questa Buena Pen 0vrass 2102 La Questa Founto,n Veda, within the Lemon Heights area. rveemn Huntington Betio Zne Processing time for annexations such as this is normally about four months after the to re matter has been submitted to our Board of Directors for their consideration. In order A Palma epa Aram;tos not to inconvenience or delay the applicants construction plans, this letter will Newport Beech authorize all above listed property owners to connect to the public sewer. Orange Pleoeno. Santo Ana nitation Districts' staff, in conjunction with the Board's policy, does not object See'Bea4n proceeding Por tojormal consummation of the annexation proceeding. u S ton aon cola Pen mroe tines county of orange avid. . Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering sanitary Minn. CatonMeaa DAURJR:je Denton Greta HAWROTMENGIENGIDEUTSCHANX M;Cwey Gly o: William Deutsch Water Dixricc Irvine Ranch 4 Fvtoc .WS:e:v -;n_¢wraenerta,Man2°e-1148encv Ccmmme8 Cn Pry:ec..'ne:1 F1+^.e1 1 1B_`+ EXHIBIT "B" ANNEXATION No. 152 - DEUTSCH ANNEXATION (DA 96-04) I w 1'P8T ) I I M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Na 7 i �. s L9]YT E w •.r•E — LA CUESTA wu DRIVE �memo oafs�+ra ree+wu ra mule mwn mmxars ama .m on�RNLI.9nr[At I I PCLI2 I M. Nb. 670 I ppp n _. �L Q _ q•� •�w J x L.L. OT26 M.M. 211/40-41 I �f �I v o.m4 vu]uc I I LOT 6 "AI PARCEL 2 I U .]mn] p �\/ I I LOT 7 PCL 11— i } PCL 2 I L.L. B2t26a LOT 9 I LOT 8 DECL 06 1RUST e+ y 1 I JUNE 2f 1980 LOT 10 r�'Y>ti P.O.B. `WrJ L T 11 PCL 8 +.v ms umu w marnm um PCL. 1 1 L _ --�— BW VA min�IOU — Wa `P.M. 104/27-2e rlf ♦ `11 M' PCL. t PARCEL 1 PCL.2 's O O LO '21 g 4 s. P K� 87-349 O M yy. p h '�r to ♦ r M.M. v5/18-19 no y yes W OBaE ♦ 8 't P \\� \VV�v e� PCLCL t �\U\U`1 ++.x.3r. WW .]zm.r. no...... a TEAR Arw' m.�. � i'H• vxtnum Br. LEGEND _ lR. NO. 8295 —AMNEGTIOM LINE i �n TR NO. 9615 M M. 382/20-21 M.M. 419/45-47 ZZM ELRINB MUMDARY LINE Pm o- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, August 27, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, August 27, 1997, at the Districts' Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: John J.Collins,Joint Chair Thomas L.Woodruff,General Counsel Peer A.Swan,Vice Joint Chair George Brown,Chair, FAHR STAFF PRESENT: Burnie Dunlap,Chair, PDC Donald F.McIntyre,General Manager Pat McGuigan,Chair,OMITS Blake P.Anderson,Chief Operations Officer Bill Steiner, DirectorlSupervisor Michelle Tuchman,Director of Communications Gary Sbeed,Director of Finance ABSENT: Jean Tappan,Committee Secretary None APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION: Receive, file and approve draft minutes of the July 30, 1997 Steering Committee meeting. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Minutes of the Steering Committee ^ Page 2 August 27, 1997 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair John Collins reported on a ruling by the State Supreme Court on a Brea redevelopment agency decision re a conflict of interest beyond the rule of necessity. General Counsel will discuss this issue and the provisions of Proposition 208 later in the meeting. . REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager made his report later in the meeting. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-4) 1. Consider Revisions to Streamline Agenda Preparation Process Jean Tappan, member of the Agenda Task Force, described proposed format changes to streamline the agenda preparation process. The changes will reduce redundancy in wording in the committees and Joint Boards agendas and the Agenda Item Transmittal (AIT) forms. Additional changes to the AIT forth will be presented to the PDC Committee at their special meetings in September. Action: The Steering Committee approved the proposed changes to the agenda format. The revised format will begin with the October meetings. 2. Review Flood Contingency Plan Blake Anderson described the current influent management plan, the existing available information and newly-developed plans to combine all procedures in one place so that staff is as prepared as possible in the event of a flood event. Cities will be contacted about popping manholes and to work with the community on a plan to reduce flow during high flow conditions. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, reported that a regional plan is being discussed with Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts and the City of Los Angeles. This would allow the pooling of resources to develop a regional public outreach program with the goal of reducing flows by educating residents and commercial and industrial dischargers about water conservation. A scoping meeting with representatives of the three agencies is planned for the middle of September. Blake reported that flow meters will be installed again this winter in an attempt to get real time data in critical areas. A computer model has been created by Carollo Engineers that allows the operators advanced planning time and a more organizaed approach to flow management through the plants. Staff is also communicating with the Corps of Engineers on their elective release program at Prado Dam. ` Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 ' August 27, 1997 The Flood Contingency Plan also includes emergency centers at both treatment plants. This effort will supplement the Integrated Emergency Response Plan (IERP). It is an interim solution for this winter's predicted El Nino condition. A letter will be sent to the city managers with copies to the Directors asking for their support in load shedding during storm events. Director Dunlap suggested that study sessions be held with the city councils and Directors of Public Works to help them understand the scope of this problem and to seek their support. Action: Communications will prepare talking points for the Directors use in these study sessions. An article will also be sent to the League of Cities for inclusion in their publication, City Lights. Director Swan suggested that simulated emergency planning exercises be planned. Staff attended a seminar on preparing for El Nino in San Diego last week and went through this kind of exercise. Meetings will be held with the County's flood control staff to identify those areas where their system is inadequate. This will allow the Districts to prepare procedures to handle excess flow in specific areas. 3. Report on Board Secretary Office Audit Don McIntyre and Michelle Tuchman reported on the results of the audit on the Board Secretary Office, which is currently a one-person division with three authorized positions. The reduction in staff was a result of promotional opportunities in other departments and provided a re- engineering opportunity to streamline procedures and systems. Other related issues that were discussed were records management and storage, records retention policy, areas of responsibility review that resulted in reassigning tasks to more appropriate work areas, and transferring contract administrative tasks to the Contracts/Purchasing Manager. Because of the reduction in responsibilities, the report recommended that the two open positions remain vacant. Cross training other members of the Communications Department will ensure that there is sufficient staff available to assist during periods of high workloads, such as agenda preparation. A paralegal from General Counsel's office is providing legal coverage to staff and the Board Secretary. Other groups are working on the records management program including Information Technology (IT) and DART's Administrative Practices Team. Chairman Collins asked staff to keep the Steering Committee updated on these issues. Director Swan asked about the status of the Districts' e-mail capabilities, specifically access through the Internet. IT is in the process of moving from Pegasus to Outlook within the Districts, and when that is complete training will begin on procedures for using the Internet. 4. Review Agenda Items Scheduled to be presented to Committees in September Director Dunlap stated that the number of items on the PDC Committee agenda doesn't relate to how much time will be required. Minutes of the Steering Committee ' Page 4 August 27, 1997 CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. REPORT BY THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager reported on conflict of interest concerns and voting abstentions discussed at the CASA conference as a result of a recent decision by the State Supreme Court that overturned an EIR certification by the City of Brea. General Counsel reported that the County has a computer tracking system in place that allows a supervisor to instantly identify when a "potential conflict"could occur. The three main issues are 1) campaign contributions; 2)gifts or other compensation; and 3) direct influence on contracts. There are also separate distinctions in the rules for these three topics. Action: The Joint Chairman directed General Counsel to provide a written opinion regarding the most recent policy and advice to the Boards of Directors. The SAWPA invoice and payment statement was discussed. Payment has been received for most of what is owed, but interest is still an issue. Staff sought direction on how to proceed to collect about $323,000 in interest. Gary Streed reviewed the background. Blake Anderson discussed how the terms of the SAWPA agreement have changed since the original agreement was signed in 1974, including a section in the current agreement that includes a provision that the parties shall meet and confer within one year to determine how interest shall be calculated. In the event agreement cannot be reached, arbitration shall be an option if both parties agree. Action: A letter invoice will be sent immediately for interest accrued ($108,000) as a result of the late payment. The interest on the 10th mgd will be invoiced separately and stating that the meet and confer process be undertaken if agreement cannot be reached. Staff was directed to suggest binding arbitration in the event the meet and confer process is unsuccessful. The General Manager announced that the Source Control Division has received first place in EPA's outstanding source control program for 1996. This is the second time the Districts has received this award. Nancy Wheatley will be making a presentation at tonight's Board meeting. Blake Anderson updated the Steering Committee members on the status of the ocean discharge permit. August 28 is the eighth anniversary of the submittal of the application for renewing the NPDES permit. At a meeting this past week a draft schedule was received from EPA. Staff has reviewed the terms and conditions of the draft permit. Letters of concurrence will be required from other agencies. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Director Swan requested an update on the intertie work forthe Green Acres Project. Work is underway. The agreement is being negotiated. The sewer line cleaning contract bid results were discussed. IRWD was low bidder. The contract will be presented to the PDC Committee for review. The General Manager provided the Committee members with an option for landscaping the triangular parcel adjacent to the Administration Building's front parking lot. The members directed staff to continue to develop alternatives for their review. Tree removal is not to be a part of any proposal. , Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 August 27, 1997 MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for September 24, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:14 p.m. Submitted by: Jean Tappan, Steed - mittee Secretary J �waaemzwm.emoammw�irw caaemEeenw,mnn�.e: F1 Ed Sec --O^ AGENDA ACT'.ON ITEM ITEM Y ❑ BOG,GONesNr ❑ JT.EDs.DISCUSS:OJ TRANSMITTAL NCN—ONSENTI ❑ P BL.. FARING Y 7Y JT.e^S. R JA'E 1 C T.EDS.AGENOAREid NO: MEETING DATE COMM.to.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS. OMTS (Originator) POO. Poc 720,Jim Herberg, ext.5086 FAHR: FAHR EXEC: EXEC Dirtsion No.,Name,and Extension STEER: 924/97 STEER JT.BDs:924197 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): 1. Approve Addendum No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement(PSA) with Camp Dresser and McKee (CDNI) for Job No.s JAD-1 and J40-2 Re: Preparation of Phase 1 of Strategic Plan in the amount of$61,667 for a total amount not to exceed $2,020,411. CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOAR0 ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Data Notice of Exemption Filed: NegalNe Declaration Approved on FM EIR Appr on_and Notice of Determination fled on - CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TPGATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES (I" l em9er Ws TrnW ) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$500,000 SOURCE: CORFSt,hac $500,000 $11,023 $488,977 $500,000 AMOUNT l OFinb Items:TRANSFE0. R: D 8 0.1.c MOU -m ER: SCMdulelDne Rem: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGETCHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AR PROJECT BUDGET Fuss Year m Budget: Master Plan Estimate: $2,118,000 0 0 $2,118,000 Year of First Costs. THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $1,395,640.00 $563,104 $61,667 $2,020,411 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION?NOT APPLICABLE HYES,state Pemramnt LimitediTerm If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section 9 /O/47 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(List): 3r5nafbr Date 1. Copy olCDM proposal lever dated September 4, 1997. CONCURRENCE ' 2. PSA Status Report p�10 3. Budget Information Table gn:re _I Date ' 'on n esi �� U 7 ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(tat) nd yA�1 ) Date 4. Copy of CDM proposal letter distant September 4,1997. De eL ( r n S. PSA Status Report 'b S - 6. Budge)Information Table Signature e Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) Page 1 of2 ADDMONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) I The Districts daily average flow(currently about 240 million gallons per day) can more than double during periods of heavy rainfall due to infiltration and inflow(1/I). The extent to which 1/1 occurs throughout the Districts' service area is not extensively documented. While there has been speculation regarding portions of the collection system whiLv are prone to 1/I, an III monitoring program is required to provide actual, documented data. During the winter of 1996-97, temporary flow meters were installed to develop land use-based flow coefficients and to calibrate the collection system computer model. The 1996.97 flow monitoring program yielded valuable dry weather data for these purposes. However, anticipated storms did not occur during the monitoring program, and wet weather 1/1 data could not be obtained. Over the past several weeks, staff and CDM have evaluated flow monitoring alternatives for the Districts'collection system to obtain better III data. The proposed monitoring program calls for 42 metering sites to monitor for infiltration for a six month period, and 20 metering sites to monitor for inflow over a two month period, with the following goals: 0 Obtain accurate data regarding 1/1 to provide for better decision making and "fine tuning"of the Districts' collection system capital improvement program which totals over$10 million annually. 0 Collect flow monitoring data which will become the basis for estimating Ill flows at"high risk' locations within the Districts' service area, and will be an important tool in prioritizing cooperative sewer rehab programs with local agencies/cities. 0 Refine 1/1 estimates which will allow better calibration of the collection system computer model. 0 Take advantage of this year's El Nino condition which is expected to provide a rare opportunity to capture III data during peak wet weather conditions. Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 4 to the PSA with CDM for Phase 1 of the Strategic Plan for the following tasks: (1) identity specific communities to be monitored, (2) select and verify the viability of specific monitoring sites, (3) assist in development of a request for proposals from flow monitoring firms, (4) provide assistance with project permitting and coordination, and (5) analyze data and prepare a summary report, in accordance with the attached proposal letter dated September 4, 1997. Addendum No. 4 will increase the PSA with CDM by$61,667 for a total amount not to exceed $2,020,411. Staff is also requesting$20,000 in staff time to manage the monitoring plan. Once CDM has completed tasks 1-3 above, staff plans to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for flow monitoring services by a specialized flow monitoring firm. Staff will then ask for approval of the PSA at the Districts' regular October Board meeting so that temporary flow meters can be installed by mid December of this year. The estimated cost for the proposed flow monitoring program is $400,000 to $600,000. Staffs recommended approach for implementing a flow monitoring program was discussed at the September 4, 1997 PDC committee meeting. Staff explained that due to time constraints, PSAs for engineering and flow monitoring services would not be presented to the PDC Committee, but will be presented directly to the Board for approval. c: Department Head AGM-Operations General Manager BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Strategic Plan Phase 1 Job No. J-40-1, J-40-2 TASK BUDGET FUNDS FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED (ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTMD AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE % BY CORF) TO DATE IN DISTRICT REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE COMPLETE NO.7 CIP FUNDS TO DATE BUDGET Management of $1,575,000 $1,427,934 --- $61,667 $1,489,601 $1,104,000 80% Peak Hydraulic Discharge Peak Hydraulic $62,000 $162,000 --- $20,000 $182,000 $103,000 65% Discharge, Staff Determination of $396,000 $306,180 --- --- $306,180 $231,000 75% Financial Charges and Fee Schedule Determination of $85,000 $110,000 --- --- $110,000 $52,000 50% Financial Charges and Fee Schedule, Staff Consulting Fee for --- $25,000 -- --- $25,000 $3,000 10% Thomas M. Dawes District 7 Sewer --- $224,630 ($224,630) -- - --- -- Maps (Charged to District No. 7 CIP) Total $2,118.000 $2,255,744 ($224,630) $81,667 $2,112,781 1,493,000 70% H:\WP.DTAIENGL M\HERSERG\GDMPSA.TSL Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. J-40A. J-40-2 Phase 1 Strategic Plan Total Project Budget: 1 9 0 000 Consultant: Camo Dresser and McKee Start Date of Project: March 27, 1996 Date Addendum Description Cost Accumulated Costs 3/27/96 Original Phase 1 Strategic Plan - Management of Peak 1,395,640 1,395,640 PSA Hydraulic Discharge and Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedule 11/20/96 1 Additional Public Involvement 138,985 1,534,625 1/22/97 2 District No. 7 Sewer Maps 224,630 1,759,255 7130197 3 Update CASSWORKS Database, Develop Pump 199.489 1,958,744 Curves, Additional Public and Board Meeting Support Proposed 4 Collection System Flow Monitoring Program 61,667 2,020,411 H:1W P.DTA1ENGWW11iERBERGIAITC DM.TBL ZMACamp Dresser & McKee Inc. l/ Y misuse, 1925 Palomar Gala Way.Suite 300 !�! arvess 9 Carlsbad.California 92006 �+ T91:619436-7755 Fu:619439-7411 li:la, September 4,1997 W.David A.Ludwin Director of Engineering County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 9272MI27 Subject: Request for Proposal-Flow Allocation and Flow Monitoring Dear Mr.Ludwin: Camp Dresser&McKee Inc.(CDM)has been requested to prepare a proposal to provide specific assistance and services to the CSDOC for two items which are in addition to our ongoing contract for J40.1,Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge. CDM has discussed these activities with CSDOC staff,and we have developed proposals for both items of work: ■ Development of a Flow Allocation Method In a letter dated June 26,1997,CDM presented the initial proposal for the development of a flow allocation method.In a subsequent memorandum,dated August 13, 1997, Tom Dawes supplemented CDM's letter and provided a detailed discussion of the flow allocation methodology. Because of the excellent,accurate,and timely population data and the availability of readily accessible land use data,it was agreed that the interests of CSDOC and its member agencies would be best served through a method which is based on population and which provides flexibility to accommodate variations such as significant industrial activity and inflow/infiltration problems. This method was seen as the most appropriate for an interim 2-year period until the Districts are consolidated. The output of this effort will consist of a flow allocation spreadsheet and a letter report. The flow allocation spreadsheet will enable CSDOC to input monthly flow information, taken at the plants,and generate a distribution of flow contributions from each of the Districts. The spreadsheet will be in an EXCEL Version 5.0 format and will be"user friendly." The letter report will outline the process used to develop the spreadsheet; the information will allow CSDOC staff to update the spreadsheet to reflect future changes in population or to reestablish the"flexibility factors"developed for each District. We believe that this flow allocation method and spreadsheet will provide CSDOC with a tool to easily,accurately and fairly apportion wastewater flow contributions to individual Districts.A summary table which quantifies the tasks and estimated level of effort is attached. A total of$7,963 is estimated for this work CDM Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. 14 Mr.David A. Ludwin September 4, 1997 Page 2 ■ Development of a Flow Monitoring Program In a letter dated July 22, 1997,CDM presented seven opportunities for potential flow monitoring programs. Based on recent discussions with your staff, two flow monitoring programs were selected for implementation at this time:infiltration monitoring and inflow monitoring. Infiltration Monitoring Groundwater infiltration occurs throughout the year. The level of infiltration which occurs throughout the Districts is not extensively documented. While there has been speculation regarding the potential locations for infiltration,an infiltration monitoring program can assist CSDOC by providing actual,documented data. Infiltration data gathered now can be compared with future infiltration data to examine the correlation between the age of the pipes and the volume of infiltration. Infiltration data also provides important information for sewer maintenance management. Areas of known infiltration problems can be targeted for repair or additional investigation using video inspection,smoke testing,or other methods. Much of the infiltration-based flow conveyed by the trunk sewer system is likely generated in the local collection systems which connect into the trunk sewer system and would therefore not be reliably registered by trunk sewer metering;meters in the upstream,local sewer systems would be most appropriate. The occurrence of El Nino this winter will likely increase the water content of the soils, thereby increasing the infiltration,through heavy rainfalls. The proposed infiltration monitoring program consists of 42 sites located throughout the Districts'service area. Sixteen of the meters would be located in"high-risk"coastal areas in Districts 5 and 11. The proximity of these meters to the Pacific Ocean will enable CSDOC to develop much better projections of seawater intrusion into the CSDOC collection system. Another sixteen meters will be installed in the northern portions of the county. Half of these meters will be placed in the La Palma area where the local colt cue lion system is believed to be older, and therefore more susceptible to infiltration, ` other parts of the collection system. The other half of these northern meters will be placed in Yorba Linda,where previous estimates of infiltration were higher than expected and additional metering is needed to examine the situation more thoroughly. The remaining ten meters will be placed in predominately industrial areas of Tustin and Anaheim,where infiltration is believed to be a problem. Selection of the 42 sites has not yet been performed. These 42 monitors should be operated for a six month period of time. We feel that if the monitors are in place from early December through May,significant wet-weather and dry-weather information can be collected.In order for the monitors to be installed by December,it is imperative that process of selecting sites and installing monitors begin immediately. ' CDM Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. ✓ Mr. David A.Ludwin September 4, 1997 Page 3 Inflow Monitoring A monitoring program to develop improved inflow estimates will focus on areas where local flooding has occurred historically. Whenever possible,results obtained from infiltration monitoring program meters in the vicinity could provide base line information about groundwater infiltration and dry weather flows. Twenty flow monitors,installed temporarily for two months during the wet-weather season,would generate data to improve inflow estimates. Selection of these 20 sites has not been done yet. We will work together with your staff to investigate historical flooding problems and make appropriate site selections. The 20 inflow monitors need to operated for two months during significant rainfall events. We recommend that monitors we installed by January and operated through February. Anticipated El Nino storms should provide the necessary rainfall for a meaningful inflow study. A schedule and summary table which quantifies the tasks and estimates the level of effort for the infiltration and inflow monitoring programs is attached. A total of$61,667 is estimated for CDM's portion of this work. We believe that this is a reasonable estimate of the cost involved based on our experience during the previous flow monitoring program. The cost for the installation,maintenance,and removal of the infiltration and inflow monitors by a qualified flow monitoring company is estimated to be approximately$400,000 to$600.000. If you or your staff have any questions regarding the information in this letter,or wish to clarify any of its points,please contact me at your earliest convenience. Very y ours, C RESS Mc Kel ene M.Burn-Lucht,P.E. Vice President ItMBGmV:bLiOWPUITMiSCLniSbP'M1 LM cc: Jim Herberg /CSDOC Nick Arhontes / CSDOC Paul Gustafson / CDM Marcus Linden / CDM County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Estimate of Work Required to Develop an Infiltration and Inflow Monitoring Program Tasks: R40 Requirements A/ Pro'En Engineer Drafter WP/Admin Task I IdentifyCommunities to be Monitored 2 16 16 Task 2 Collect Local Sewer Me 8 80 Task Select MonitoringSites 4 24 120 40 Task 4 Field VerifySite Viability(w/CSDOC Stall) 40 Task 5 Assist In the Development of the RFP 16 Task 6 Assist In the Evaluation of Bidders 4 Task Provide Assistance With Permitting 8 40 Task Management and Coordination 60 20 Task 9 Anal xe Data and Pre a Letter Re rt 8 32 120 40 40 Tabd Hours 76 12 154 436 96 40 814 Mind Cost $61,667 Deliverables: Assumptions: 4000 wale map showing general montior site locations CSDOC staff will be responsible for permitting. CDM will provide technical support only. 200 wale map indicating location of each monitor(one map per monitor) Maximum of five days of field work investigating manholes. Draft text for technical portions of the REP One visit(if necessary)with each city to obtain sewer maps. Final Submittal-Letter Repon Two meetings by PM and project engineer with CSDOC staff. 1.UX30WR01ZWR0F0SALVIorxll0.xla p gxl 41 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Proposed Schedule for the Infiltration and Inflow Monitoring Program Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jvf. Identify Communities to be Monitored Collect Local Sewer Maps Select Monitoring Sites Field Verify Site Viability w/CSDOCStaff) Assist in We Development of the RFP Issue RFP 0 Bidding 0 Assist In the Evaluation of Bidders ■ Award Contract Finalization/NTP Provide Andstance With Pertaining Install Monitors(For Infiltration Study) Flow Monitoring(For Infiltration Study) Install Monitors(For Inflow Study) Flow Monitoring(For Inflow Study) Management and Coordination Download Inflow Data Download Infiltration Data Anadym Dam and Prepare Letter Report CDM Tuk ® To be performed by others(CSDOC or contractor) County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY. SEPTEMBER 3. 1997-5:45 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on September 3, 1997, at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLLCALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present, Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance John Collins, Joint Chair Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Steve Anderson Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Mark Leyes Mike Moore, ECM Manager Margie L. Rice Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Dave Sullivan Ed Torres, Engineering Supervisor-O&M Charles E. Sylvia Mark Esquer, Engr. Supervisor-O&M Hank Wedaa Sandy Asachika, Sr. Financial Analyst Tony Valenzuela, Electrical Engineer Pat Magnante, Committee Secretary Absent: Others Present: Chris Norby John E. Noyes Terry Fleming, EPA Region IX Doug Deiner, MEC Alan Mearns, NOAA Art Wolfson, MEC Sub-contractor Ashwani Wason, Carollo Engineers Steve Weisberg, SCCWRP APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 September 3, 1997 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the July 2, 1997 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Guests were introduced to Directors and staff. No report was given. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER No report was given. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager, reported on two items: • Last week we had the opportunity to talk to Congressman Packard's office by way of Eric Mondero of his staff who was visiting the OCWD looking at the research facilities that are ongoing there. Last Friday afternoon, Tom Dawes, Mark Leyes, John Collins, John Conley and I visited Congressman Cox's office to describe the needs for water reclamation in Orange County and discuss the importance of the OCR project and the regional implications. Both meetings went well and led me to believe we will start getting some well-deserved attention from the OC delegation and from the California Republican delegation. Congressman Cox invited Bill Mills and me to give presentations on 9/11/97 to the California Delegation. We are hopeful we will get$20M for the OCR project. The Metropolitan Water District is also interested in providing funding up to $250/acre feet(roughly one-half of the project cost). The OCR project would be the largest project in the country - roughly equivalent to 20% of Orange County's water supply. • El Nino Planning -One element will be flow monitoring so we can understand the amount of infiltration and inflow that result from heavy rains. For your information, we will be giving a "heads up" at the Planning, Design and Construction Committee (PDC) meeting tomorrow night asking to go directly to the Board in late September for a contract for roughly $1/2M worth of flow monitoring in the system during the Winter and Spring periods. This has two important aspects to it: 1)To give us better planning numbers for our 30-year Master Plan and, 2) It will give us some real-time flow numbers that may help us In responding to the extraordinary sewer flows we can expect if we get the kind of rains that some weather predictors are forecasting (NOAA and others). Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 September 3, 1997 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Robert Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, provided handouts and reported on the following items: • Preliminary report on the corrosion study of the two treatment plants is due mid-September. The results indicate that we scored pretty high marks (8 '%out of 10) and identified a few problem areas. We are not corrosion-free but we do not have major problems. • Tour of research project-There will be a tour of the primary effluent filtration project during next month's meeting. • The following handouts were distributed: 1) Memo to Blake Anderson dated July 17, 1997 which was omitted as an attachment to the O& M Monthly Report, 2) Primary effluent filtration summary (project goals and potential), 3) Presentation handouts for Agenda Item OMTS97-018. • Preparation of the Districts'Annual Report for 1996 is in progress. We were in complete compliance for air, water, solids and energy. • Peak flow handling in the outfall and collection system is being studied as one of our strategic planning elements. • During a brain-storming session with staff, O & M has compiled a list of 85 project items related to El Nino planning which will be ranked and prioritized. • Historically at Plant No. 1, we have had good luck with low odor complaints but have had seven complaints this summer. Staff is working closely with neighbors and are touring the area regularly. Director Wedaa requested and was given a copy of the O & M project list. O&M Monthly Report Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report: An Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Monthly Report for the OMTS Committee is submitted for review. The report focuses on compliance, safety, financial projects and performance measures for O& M and is intended to provide the Committee members with information on a timely basis. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, reported on the following items: • The new federal regulations for ozone and particulate matter in the air have been adopted. The South Coast Air Basin, which is the air basin we are in, is out of compliance on the Ozone Rule which has lowered the standard and changed the averaging. There are also new rules for small particulates (2.5 microns). Clearly, both rules are going to impact the air basin and will impact us. The OMTS Committee will hear moreover the next several months. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 September 3, 1997 • The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board had a general permit for land application of biosolids that was overturned. The Judge ruled that the general order would be withdrawn unless there was a commitment for funding for an EIR. Funds have been solicited by Trl-TAC and CASA. There is over$350,000 now pledged to the EIR to do this work. On 8/26/97, treatment plant representatives met with the State Water Resources Control Board and with the Regional Board for the Central Valley to prepare for the court date of 9/12/97. There is some discussion about making the EIR a Statewide EIR rather than just limiting it to the Central Valley. • Regarding the Kem County ordinance to regulate biosolids In Kern County,we have a deadline of 9/25/97 to get the ordinance in draft form to the commission. • The Department of Toxic Substance Control is changing their waste classification system. They have put together numbers to put biosolids into the category of hazardous waste. Stay tuned for next month's Quarterly update. • (Reported by Steve Weisberg, SCCWRP) In 1994 the County Sanitation Districts, in partnership with 12 other organizations, conducted a Regional monitoring program outside our immediate outfall. A wrong conclusion was reached and printed in the L.A. Times whereas 90% of the area is toxic. A coalition was formed to provide an accurate picture of the actual level of contamination in the outfall. That project, which went from Point Conception in the north to the Mexican border in the south from basically right off shore to 200 meters depth (about 12 miles offshore), was covered with 260 sample sites made up by groups like yourself which created a very unique sampling effort. Those organizations who participated in the last effort have agreed to participate in another Regional effort in the summer of 1998. It has been opened up by invitation to other agencies and organizations and over 100 people have signed up to attend a planning meeting which will be held at the CSDOC Administrative offices. • A handout was provided that includes the following items: Memo on permit renewal issues, copy of the staff report to the Regional Water Quality Control Board who is meeting on September 12 on the recreational survey and plume work performed by Districts staff, and a letter from the Executive Officer of the RWQCB. • Source Control has won the Pre-treatment Division of the Year Award. An explanation of the handout entitled, "Source Control Division's Performance and Productivity Update"was provided by Nancy. Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, extended Source Control's appreciation to Nancy stating that since she joined the Technical Services Department, Source Control's productivity has increased due to Nancy's request for monthly performance updates which were continuously monitored to determine where improvement was needed. Director McGuigan asked for clarification regarding EIR funding issues. Mike Moore provided this information. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 September 3, 1997 REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given by General Counsel. DISCUSSION ITEM ( items) 1. OMTS97-016 AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WITH DUKE ENERGY TRADING AND MARKET SERVICES, L.L.C. FOR PURCHASE OF NATURAL GAS, SPECIFICATION P-170. Motion, Information only. 2. OMTS97-017 OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT Motion: Information only. 3. OMTS97-018 GAS AND ELECTRICITY (ENERGY) OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE REPORT. Motion: Information only. 4. OMTS97-019 INFORMATION REGARDING INSTALLATION OF VAPEX HYDROGEN SULFIDE CONTINUOUS MONITORS AT FOUL AIR SCRUBBERS. Motion: Information only. 5. OMTS97-020 PULSE POWER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT REPORT. Motion, Information only. CLOSED SESSION There was no dosed session. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 6 September 3, 1997 OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY No other business. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for October 1, 1997 at the Districts'Administrative Offices. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:52 p.m. Submitted by: '-- Patricia Magnante 61 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary H:\WP.DTAXOMIAlOXMAGNANTENOMTS_C-MEPT97NINUTES.997 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue y Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday. September 4. 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on September 4, 1997, at 6:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Of re. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present, Staff Present: Burnie Dunlap, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Tom Carroll Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager John Collins, Joint Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Shirley Dettloff, Vice Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Brian Donahue Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Patsy Marshall John Linder, Construction Manager Eva Miner-Bradford Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Christina Shea Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Todd Spitzer Jeff Shubik, Electrical Engineer Bob Zemel Jim Mullins, Electrical Engineer Absent Others Present: Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the August 7, 1997 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were approved as drafted. It was noted that Christina Shea was listed as absent at the meeting, but took part in the tour and should have been listed as present. v Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 2 September 4, 1997 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager advised that the FAHR Committee Meeting on September 10, 1997 will include a discussion of the Investment Policy. All Committee members are invited to that Committee meeting. The General Manager advised that we have updated a flowchart diagram of our treatment facilities. Copies were distributed at the end of the meeting. It has been discussed before about the need for establishing better cooperation between the cities and the Districts. A letter will be mailed tomorrow to the City Managers and General Managers of the Districts we serve advising there is a meeting here on September 23 to discuss potential cooperative programs for system upgrades. The General Manager discussed the PDC Workshops. Frank Dryden has interviewed each Committee member and he has given us a long list of comments, suggestions, and observations that the Committee has made to him. This information will be handed out as you leave tonight. Frank will be the moderator of those two workshops. The first workshop is on September 18, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., and includes dinner. At this workshop, we plan to present information on how staff does project development, budgeting, and handles design issues. We will then introduce the topics we are going to be discussing on September 20. It will begins and 9:00 a.m and conclude at 1:30 p.m., and includes lunch. We want this workshop to be very interactive. We will talk about consultant selection, change orders, delegation of authority, and communications. Communication is the bottom line issue Committee members have expressed concern about. Please advise of any questions or comments. It was suggested that if members could attend the September 18 workshop, they could meet with the Director of Engineering after the September 20 meeting and get an overview of what was discussed. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager advised of the planning for El Nino . It is expected to be a record setting, rainy winter. Our Operations & Maintenance, Engineering, and Information Technology staff have met to brainstorm on what needs to be done including things such as repairing valve boxes, renting standby equipment, and making sure that all various systems are ready to go, storing sand bags, and making contact with Orange County Flood Control and City Managers. There are over 80 items on the list right now. Some of them already tie into our Integrated Emergency Response Plan, some of them already tie into an Interim Flow Management Plan that Camp Dresser& McKee has given to us as part of the Strategic Plan. We want to be as prepared as possible for the event of very v Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 3 September 4, 1997 large sewage Bows caused by wide-spread flooding of the county's streets. In January of 1995, we had some very heavy rains and had well over 500 million gallons a day of flow coming into the plants, where our average flow is about 240 million gallons a day. We will be contacting various agencies who also have a wide regional responsibility here in Orange County. We expect a group of public agencies here in Orange County will be working on a regular basis planning for this winter's very wet conditions. The Assistant General Manager also discussed the Orange County Reclamation Project. We have been working on Federal funding for a couple of years, mainly with the lead of the Orange County Water District. Congressman Chris Cox invited us to make a presentation to the California Republican delegation at their regular Thursday lunch meeting of September 11. Blake Anderson and Bill Mills, who is the General Manager of the Orange County Water District, will make a five to ten minute presentation on the importance of reclamation and, in particular, the Orange County project. We're looking for a $20 million contribution from the Federal government through the Bureau of Reclamation for this project. The Metropolitan Water District, as recently as last week, has indicated a very serious interest in providing funding for this project. That could be as much as half of the cost. This is very preliminary right now, but in informal conversations with Metropolitan Water District, they have indicated an interest in providing us significant funding for the project. The Joint Committee of the Sanitation Districts and the Water District Boards continue to meet on this and as the numbers begin to firm up, and the initial engineering begins to firm up, this agency will then make a step by step commitment to this project. At this point, the Board has not taken affirmative action to commit to actual funding of the project. At the last Board Meeting, there was some confusion about the schedule of Committee meetings, and we indicated we would put out an amended schedule of all the meetings through the end of September. A copy will be distributed tonight. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering advised that earlier this week, the staff of the Engineering Department met with our Finance Director, Gary Streed, our Purchasing and Contract Manager, Marc DuBois, and Tom Woodruff of our General Counsel's office. The purpose of the meeting was to review the routine issues that the Engineering Department deals with our General Counsel on, relative to contracts and Professional Services Agreements, and to discuss if staff could take on more of those tasks. Using our own staff would help reduce costs and keep things more efficient. Mark DuBois is going to be working with Tom Woodruffs office to develop new protocols to help us do those things more efficiently, and streamline the process of General Counsel's approval. The Director of Engineering also discussed a proposed trunk line flow monitoring program for winter 1997-98. Last winter, as part of our Strategic Plan, we placed 30 Bow meters within our trunk system. We were trying to develop land use flow coefficients, and to predict future flows. Unfortunately last year, we did not get a lot of rain so we were not able to collect a lot of useful data that would help us identify areas where we have infiltration and inflow problems in the system. Before this winter, we plan to place another set of flow monitors in the system and gather data to help us identify areas where we have infiltration and inflow problems within the system and help us prioritize our collection system CIP projects. El Nino conditions may provide a unique opportunity to get a lot of flow data V Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 4 September 4, 1997 associated with anticipated large storms. To expedite the work, we would like to discuss the metering program at the September Board meeting. We are recommending two contracts. One would be either a new contract or addendum with CDM to develop the flow monitoring program, to help us manage it, collect data, do the analysis, and the associated engineering work. We expect the cost to be $50,000 to$60,000 at this time. CDM is doing our Strategic Plan and they did the flow monitoring for us last year, and therefore, are the best qualified to do the work. The other contract will be with a flow metering company to place up to 60 meters within our system for six months to collect data not only during the winter, but also into next spring. We have preliminary budgetary estimates of around $400,000 to $600,000 for this effort. We estimate that we have half a billion dollars worth of collection facilities, and we will be investing over$10 million a year for the next 20 years in our system in either rehabilitation upgrades or relief sewers. This flow study will help us identify priorities for improvements and assure that our capital improvement money is spent wisely. We need about 60 meters put in place to try to identify areas within the system where we think we have infiltration and inflow problems. The computer model that CDM has built is based on some assumptions for peak flows during the winter. Based on those assumptions, we have identified present deficiencies in our system. This flow information will help us verify the data and deficiencies needing improvements in our system. The chair recommended to the Committee that they go ahead and under the issue of expediency, have it moved to the full Board for their consideration. They have the final approval as a Board in any circumstance. Simply avoiding a protocol which is committee consideration before full Board, but the full Board isn't going to consider this as an urgency measure. It will be presented like any other item, and the Board can say yes, no, or modify. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. MONTHLY REPORT ON CHANGE ORDERS There were no Change Orders this month. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS(Item No. 1) 1. PDC97-42: DISCUSSION RE: ELECTRICAL POWER STUDIES, JOB NO. J-25-4. Director of Engineering will give a presentation on the electrical power system studies. RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action recommended by staff. Information only item. A presentation was made by the Engineering Manager. This study is an 18-month look at existing electrical system conditions and future needs at both Plant Nos. 1 and 2. A comprehensive study will be conducted to look at existing loads, short circuiting, protective devices, harmonics, motor starting loads, ground systems, reliability, and an electrical Master Plan through 2020. V Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 5 September 4, 1997 The Committee members raised concerns related to risk and liability with the existing system. Staff was directed to address the issues of risk management and legal exposure with the PDC Committee at their next meeting. ACTION ITEMS(Nos. 2-4) 2. PDC97.43: ACCEPT CONTRACT 2-7A AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT WITH PAULUS ENGINEERING, INC. FOR MODIFICATIONS TO PORTIONS OF ATWOOD SUBTRUNK FOR RIVERSIDE FREEWAY RECONSTRUCTION OF 91/57 INTERCHANGE. The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of the execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Contract No. 2-7A with Paulus Engineering, Inc. as complete, and approve the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval, with a correction to be made to the Revised Budget Section on the front page of the AIT. 3. PDC97-44: APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS —TWAS FEED TO DIGESTERS F & G, JOB NO. P2-39-1 (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests approval of plans and specifications and authorization to advertise for bids for modifications to allow the Thickened Waste Activated Sludge(f WAS)to be fed to Digesters F & G. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the plans and specifications on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2) authorize the General Manager to set October 14, 1997 at 11:00 a.m. for bid opening; and 3) authorize the Board Secretary to publish the notice Inviting Bids. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. 4. POC9745: PLANT NO. 2 WAREHOUSE, JOB NO. P2-65, AGREEMENT WITH LORD FLEMING ARCHITECTS, INC. The Director of Engineering requests approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. for the design of a new warehouse at Plant No. 2. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approval Professional Services Agreement with Lord Fleming, providing for design of plans and specifications for a warehouse at Plant No. 2 in an amount not to exceed $42,705. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. d Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 6 September 4, 1997 OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS, OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday, September 4, 1997. ADJOU NMAI The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Submitted by: 7 Gail Cain Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Secretary :gc H W WA� NGWNCe1V5EPW.IN WPG F,WSe DaaO AGENDA ❑ cora.WFo.DEM ITEM ❑ CIX.M.ACTION ITEM ° JT.MS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT.eD6 SENT)SKKi EARING /��M'�ON�-CONSENT) rJ JT,eDs.eEEMH3 DATE /e(r?} JT.MS.AGENDA ITEM NO. Z) MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO, DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMITS: OMITS tOdginetor) PDC:9/4197 PDC_LJ_ FAHR: FAHR 2 730,Charles Pasinli, 5149 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Coleco No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:924/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wordina: ACCEPT CONTRACT 2-7A AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT WITH PAULUS ENGINEERING, INC. FOR MODIFICATIONS TO PORTIONS OF ATWOOD SUBTRUNK FOR RIVERSIDE FREEWAY RECONSTRUCTION OF 91157 INTERCHANGE (District 2). The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of the execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion. Recommended Action(s): 1. Approve Contract No. 2-7A with Paulus Engineering, Inc. as complete and approve the Final Closeout Agreement, and filing of the Notice of Completion. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved an 12/18/96 Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on_ CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO43ATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION SUDGETAMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES Nnmi suave Mu. Tnn..,.l TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$90,000. $90,000 $71,298 $18,702 $100,136 SOURCE: CORP JO DISTRICTS Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:$10,136. ScheduRAJne Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS Arr PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: $90,000.00 $0.00 $10,136.00 $100,136.00 Master Plan Estimate: Veer of Fist Costa: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $79,220.00 $0.00 $0.00 $79,220.00 WILLPROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REOUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES "YES,aMenu..r: _Permanent LlmRW Term IfYEs,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION aecgon R.a..eavtaw Page 1 of H:\W P.DTMENG1ENM2-7AWIT-FORM. ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Ul _ /. Budget Information Table Originator ate CO RRENCES: iy-y7 nature I Date Div n Manager(Or Designee) 1.ATTACHMENTS �Table ENTS TO JOINNT BOARDS AGENDA(List) Ai net a Date D e^�(Or es' set p Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) Contract No. 2-7A, Modifications to Portions of Atwood Subtrunk, consists of constructing approximately 100-feet of concrete encased sewer lines and two manholes in the vicinity of the 57 Freeway and Miral-oma Avenue within the City of Anaheim. The plans and specifications for Contract No. 2-7A were prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers of Irvine, CA. The construction contract was approved with Paulus Engineering, Inc. on March 20, 1997. The contract was completed on time and with no change orders. Original Contract Price: $79,220.00 Previously Authorized Changes: $ 0.00 Amended Contract Price: $79,220.00 CP:Ih c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Rya o9%W Page 2 of 2 H:\W P.DTAIENGIENGU-7A1AD-FORM BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE MODIFICATIONS TO PORTIONS OF ATWOOD SUBTRUNK FOR RIVERSIDE FREEWAY RECONSTRUCTION OF 91/57 CONTRACT NO. 2-7A BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK (ADOPTED BY AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZED TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO COMPLETE TO CORF) DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED DATE DATE(%) FUNDS CONSULTANT $9,916 $9,916 $9,916 $9,916 100% STAFF $864 $10.152 $11,000 $10,152 99% CONTRACTOR $79,220 $71,298 $79.220 $71.298 100% TOTAL $90,0001 $91,366 $100,136 $91,366 H;W p.dlabnglangkPl-36d�budgbbl.As ° M s� DW GaN AGENDA ❑ CCbM.INFO.REM � �' ❑ COMM.ACTION ITEM ITEM ❑ JT.BDS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT.BOG.DLSENT) N p m (NON-CONSENT) (❑; BI(I}C�HEAgINp 7 � ' /[JT.WE MIERINO DATE Jr.BDS.AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 MEETING DATE COMM.10.NO, DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Orlginatw) PDC:914197 POC FAHR: FAHR All 720,Wendy Sevenandt, 5058 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Exlenaisn JT.BDS:924/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS--TWAS FEED TO DIGESTERS F& G, JOB NO. P2-39-1(AII Districts): The Director of Engineering requests approval of plans and specifications and authorization to advertise for bids for modifications to allow the Thickened Waste Activated Sludge (TWAS)to be fed to Digesters F &G. Recommended Actionts): 1. Approve the plans and specifications on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2) authorize the General Manager to set October 14, 1997 at 11:00 a.m. for bid opening; and 3) authorize the Board Secretary to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exampt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed:March 17,1988 1120/96 CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES f ftlBwe. O . Tan4.nl TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$180,000 $180,000 $0 $180,000 $180,000 SOURCE: CORF SchedulelLine Items:B.4.b. AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SchedulelLine Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AR PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget:1997 $180,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $180,000.00 Master Plan Estimate:New Project Year of First Cost.199T THIS AITIVENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION?NO IIYES,state number'. Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION sectbn .11.7 Page 1 of 2 H'.\W P.DTA\ENG\ENG\P2.39.1 NIT-BI D.W PD ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Ds1): `) 7 1. Budget Information Table a Odginator Date/ CONCURRENC S: / 9liA Signature Date D" ' Man er(Or gee ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(Ust) 1. Budgetlnformation Table Jim Signatur Date De (Or / i9 197- Sign re Da e Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) Currently, there are fifteen digesters at Plant No. 2 that are designated as"active digesters". These active digesters are used for the anaerobic digestion of sludge. Other digesters are used as holding tanks prior to sludge dewalering. Raw sludge from the primary clarifiers is now fed to all fifteen active digesters. Thickened Waste Activated Sludge (TWAS) is the sludge from the secondary treatment process that also requires decomposition through sludge digestion. Previous projects have provided for TWAS feed to thirteen of these active digesters. The purpose of this job is to construct feed piping, valves, appurtenances, instrumentation and controls to transfer the TWAS to the remaining two active digesters (Digesters F & G ) at Plant No. 2. Digester performance will be improved with the ability to spread the organic loading from the TWAS among all active digesters. The design was performed by Lee & Ro, Inc., as a part of the project Rehabilitation of Digesters, Job No. P2-39. An addendum was approved by the Boards of Directors in November 1996 to prepare plans and specifications for this job separate from the other 132-39 to expedite the installation of the TWAS feed to Digesters F &G, because early completion of this work was requested by the Operations and Maintenance Department to allow the operational benefits to be experienced sooner. Funding for the design work was allocated in the 1996-97 fiscal year budget for Job No. P2-39 and the design was completed in that fiscal year. A new budget item was created in the 1997-98 fiscal year budget for the construction activities associated with this, Job No. P2-39-1. Therefore, the Budget Information Table that follows for Job No. P2-39-1 does not include design costs because they are included in the overall design work of P2-39. The engineer's estimate is $125,000. WTS jmf H:\WP.DTAXENGtENGN2-39-MIT-BID.WPD c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Re M`U97 Page 2 of 2 H1WPATAIENGIENG1P239-1 WIT.BID.WPD BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE TWAS Feed to Digesters F & G Job No. P2-39.1 TASK BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED (ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE TO DATE BY CORF) TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE FUNDS STAFF 55,000 55,000 55,000 0 0 CONSTRUCTION 125,000 0 0 Total r 180,000 55,000 55,000 0 0 H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENGIP2.39-1WIT-BID.TBL Fw W Sec llse DnN AGENDA ❑ CONM INFO.REM ❑ COMM.ACTION ITEM ITEM ❑ rT.SM.CONSEJrr TRANSMITTAL ❑ n.MS.DISCUSSION -- (NON-CONSENT) ❑ PUSUC NEARING 4 07 n.SM.MEETING DATE A 1*68) JTBOS.AGENDArfEMNO. (4)MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OUTS (Originator) PDC: 9/4/97 PDC 7- S FAHR: FAHR All Div. 720, Kathy Millea, Ext. 5053 EXEC: EXEC STEER. STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: 9/24/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordinm PLANT NO. 2 WAREHOUSE, JOB NO. P2-65, AGREEMENT WITH LORD FLEMING ARCHITECTS, INC. The Director of Engineering requests approval of a professional services agreement with Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. for the design of a new warehouse at Plant No. 2. Recommended Actionlsl: 1. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. providing for design of plans and specifications for a warehouse at Plant No. 2 in an amount not to exceed $42,705. CEOA REVIEW: Pmjea Is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC Date Notice of Exemption Filed. ITEM: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on July 1989 and Notice of Determination filed on_ May 28, 1997 CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES F-1 Bwpel Pxa Tmol—1 TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $1,179,000 $568,000 $0 $568,000 $1,179,000 SOURCE: CORF Schedule/Line Items:B.B.a. AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET SUDGETCHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION BUDGET TOTAL CHANGES THIS AT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget:: 1997-98 $1.179,000 N/A N/A $1,179,000 Mister Plan Eatlmate: Year of Fast Costs: 1997-98 THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $42,705 N/A S42,705 $1,179.000 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,slate number. —Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(List): Onglnator Date t. Staff Proposal Evaluation 2. Request for Proposals Mailing List CONC NCES�/ _ a Sign re t. Div on M na a e) 47 ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) Si ' Date Depa ( Sig Signature v Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) The existing warehouse at Plant No. 2 was built in 1977 by a contractor as a temporary structure to house materials during a construction project. Upon completion of the construction project, the Districts opted to purchase the structure to provide Plant No. 2 with a temporary warehouse. This "temporary" facility is now 20 years old. It does not meet current building codes, nor the needs of the warehouse staff. To remedy this problem, an Architectural and Engineering firm was retained in 1989 to design a warehouse which would meet the needs of Plant No. 2 through the year 2050. Design and permitting of this estimated $3.4 million structure was completed and construction was to bid in June 1995. Due to the concurrent Orange County bankruptcy, however, the project was initially put on hold. In November 1995, the Ad Hoc re Space Utilization Committee decided the designed structure was too expensive, and Districts' staff was directed to renovate the existing structure instead of constructing a new warehouse. Original cost estimate of the project in November 1995 was $485,000. Staff began the preliminary design of the renovation, and determined that the actual cost would be $699,600. In February 1997, staff approached the Steering Committee with a request to investigate a new warehouse in lieu of renovating the existing warehouse. The Steering Committee approved staff development of a proposal and directed staff to bring this item to the PDC Committee. Staff hired an architectural firm to provide an initial cost estimate for a new, simple warehouse building, which would allow opportunity for expansion in the future. The architectural firm prepared a cost estimate for a square, 20,000 square foot building with one loading dock. The total cost estimate is$1,179,000. In May 1997, PDC and the Board of Directors approved staffs recommendation to construct a new warehouse in lieu of rehabilitating the existing warehouse. On July 31, 1997, a Request for Proposals was sent to 21 consultants, These consultants are all specialist in warehouse design, have public works experience, and are based in Orange County. Four proposals were received and evaluated on the project approach, the response to the Scope of Work, the suitability of the project team, and the experience with warehouse design and public works. The proposal evaluation team consisted of members from Engineering, Purchasing and Operations and Maintenance. Staff evaluation of the proposals recommends Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. to perform the design. Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. has extensive warehouse design experience as well as public works experience. This firm has thoroughly addressed the Scope of Work in their project approach and has agreed to the tight schedule established by staff. While Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. scored slightly lower than another firm in the proposal evaluation, their fee proposal was substantially lower than the higher ranked firm. Due to the small differential in proposal scores and high differential in fee proposals, staff ranked Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. as first in the overall evaluation. Staff recommends that the PDC approve a professional services contract with Lord Fleming Architects, Inc. to perform the design of a new Plant No.2 warehouse at a fee not to exceed $42,705. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations Geneal Manager WAREHOUSE Job No.P2.65 TASK PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED% BUDGET AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE TO TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE DATE FUNDS Design Consultant $95,000 -0- $42,705 $42,705 -0- -0- Design Staff $140.800 -0- $140,800 $140,800 -0- -0- Building Permits $45,600 -0- $45,600 $45.600 -0- -0- Construction Staff $117,600 -0- 1 -0- -0- 1 -0- 1 -0- Construction $780,000 1 -0- -0- 1 -0- 1 -0- 1 -0- TOTAL $1,179,000 1 -0- $229,105 1 $229,105 1 -0- 1 -0- County Sanitation Districts `0 of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday, September 10, 1997, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, September 10, 1997, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Offices. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: George Brown, Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance John J. Collins, Joint Chair Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Jan Debay Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration Barry Denes Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Norman Z. Eckenrode Chris Dahl, Director of Information Technology Mark Leyes Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Mark A. Murphy Gregg Mathews, Principal Administrative Analyst Thomas R. Sallarelli Mike White, Controller Mark Schwing Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Marc Dubois, Contracts/Purchasing Manager Lisa Loney, Human Resources Manager Committee Directors Absent : Tent Josway, Safety & Emergency Response Manager Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary William G. Steiner Others Present: Other Directors Present: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel James Ferryman Rita Seymour, PIMCO Chris Norby Jeff Stone, Budget Manager, City of Anaheim Margie Rice Charlene Jung, Treasurer, City of Anaheim Charles Sylvia APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the July 9, 1997 meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee were approved as drafted. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 2 September 10, 1997 , REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER In his absence, General Manager Don McIntyre requested that Gregg Mathews report to the Committee on the following items: • Item No. 6: FY 96197 Year-End Performance Objective and Workplan Report: Mr. Mathews reported that the General Manager found this to be a very interesting report. It is a culmination of several quarterly reports provided to the FAHR Committee over the course of the last fiscal year. It includes all of the data and results of the data that appeared in last year's budget and workplan. One noteworthy component is that, based on last year's results, the Districts completed and met 82% of its internal performance objectives and 87% of its workplan items. Mr. Mathews stated that staff continues to struggle with the format and presentation of this material, in an effort to make it user-friendly to staff and the Directors, and any suggestions on how to improve in this area are welcome. • Item 9: Districts'Assessment and Reinvention Team (DART) Phase III Status Report: Mr. Mathews advised that the Districts is spending a significant amount of effort re- engineering our operation with employee-driven committees. The Phase III report basically summarizes our progress to date, as well as future plans for the DART Committee. REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER The Assistant General Manager had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE • Finance Director Gary Streed introduced Rita Seymour of Pacific Investment Co. (PIMCO), the Districts' external money manager, who was present to answer any questions concerning the quarterly investment management report or the investment policy. Jeff Stone, Budget Manager, City of Anaheim, and Charlene Jung, Treasurer, City of Anaheim, were present at the request of Director Zemel who was unable to attend. Mr. Streed advised that the monthly Treasurers report, the quarterly investment report, and the annual investment report would all be discussed this evening, and was a good opportunity for anyone wishing to learn more about the Districts' financial program. • Mr. Streed advised the Committee that the monthly Treasurer's Report was distributed prior to the meeting in accordance with policy. The unrealized gains or losses included in the report is a new reporting requirement. The current report shows a loss which will be absorbed because of the "hold to maturity' policy. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources, reported on three issues: The Districts passed the AQMD audit on the rideshare program, even after some incentives originally in the plan were removed during the meet and confer process. It appears that the Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 3 September 10, 1997 AOMD is backing off on some of their stricter requirements. As a result, the Districts is doing a great job. • The Districts formed a labor management committee consisting of all three unions to discuss the broadbanding issue. A second meeting was held today. Mr. Peterman advised that broadbanding eliminates the current seniority or step system and replaces it with a system based on pay for skills and performance. Broadbanding would also eliminate a number of classifications, creating a more generalized workforce instead of a specialized one. Agreement has been reached with the committee to work through the issues as a team. A formal report will be presented to the Committee in October. • The computer loan program, implemented one month ago to issue loans to employees to purchase computers at 5% interest, has been very successful. We have already met our $150,000.00 limit. Out of 550 employees, 60 employees have taken advantage of the program, and it is expected another 60 will apply for a loan over the next year or two. Loans are to be paid back through payroll deductions. In July, the Committee directed staff to return when the $150,000 cap was reached. Mr. Fetterman requested the Committee's guidance in order to increase the program by an additional $150,000, and questioned whether the Committee could act on the request tonight or should it wait until the next Committee or Joint Boards meeting. Mr. Peterman stated that this is the most cost-effective computer training program the Districts has, since employees are given an incentive to learn new computer skills and programs on their own time. After a brief discussion, the Committee advised that since this item was not on the Agenda, it could not be acted on tonight, but it should be brought before the Steering Committee at its meeting of September 24. Mr. Peterman was directed to prepare a proposal with several alternatives. The Steering Committee will then be able to make a recommendation to the Joint Boards. . REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, reported that Item No. 8, Nofification of Award of Contract for Sewer Line Cleaning, appearing on the Consent Calendar, is a receive and file item and concerns District No. 7. Mr. Hodges stated he will be contacting the District 7 Directors during the week to discuss this item, since it will appear on the Joint Boards agenda for District 7 to vote on. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS Michelle Tuchman, Communications Director reported on the following: • The Districts is going to be the lead agency of a tri-agency project with Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts and the City of Los Angeles, to develop public awareness for water conservation during major rainstorms such as El Nino. The first meeting is scheduled for next Tuesday. Media attention has been given to the fact that three major agencies are working together on a project on a regional basis. The three agencies will be sharing staff and monetary resources. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 September 10, 1997 • A new program to train employees as tour guides has been developed. In the past, the Districts has been inundated with requests for Plant tours, especially during the school season. The Districts sometimes schedule up to six tours a week, with only two employees giving the tours, which normally last one-and-one-half hours. Those employees interested in giving one tour a month were requested to sign up for training after first obtaining their supervisor's approval. About 40 employees have indicated an interest, and 20 employees have already started training. There is a two-part training program, and we are currently in the second phase. • Our wastewater primer has been updated which describes what goes on at the Districts' plants. A copy is available for any Directors interested. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff reported that the California Supreme Court handed down an ominous decision regarding the California Employees' Retirement System Act of 1937, as a result of a case filed in Ventura County. The essence of the decision was that it was determined that certain benefits afforded to employees must be added to the dollar value of their salary compensation so as to determine the net final compensation. This final compensation is the basis for paying the retirement benefits. The decision will affect all 1937 Act public employee retirement systems, and all member public agencies. The agencies will be affected by being required to make additional payments to the retirement systems. A full report will be given at the next FAHR Committee meeting. There will be no impact in the next 30 days. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 11 -91 1. FAHR97-54: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 1997 (All Districts): The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 1997 and forward to the Joint Boards. 2. FAHR97-55: CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (COP) REPORT (All Districts): RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this information-only item. 3. FAHR97-56: EMPLOYMENT STATUS REPORT(All Districts): Total head count at the Districts as of August 20, 1997 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this information-only item. 4. FAHR97-57: INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1997 (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this information-only report. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 v September 10, 1997 5. FAHR97-58: COST AVOIDANCE AS A RESULT OF THE DISTRICTS' INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE PROGRAM (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this information-only status report. 6. FAHR97-59: FY 96/97 YEAR-END PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE AND WORKPLAN REPORT COVERING THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review, approve and forward the 1996-97 Year-End Report for the period ended June 30, 1997, to the Joint Boards. 7. FAHR97-60: REPORT ON NEGOTIATED CHEMICAL PURCHASES AND COST REDUCTIONS (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this information-only report. 8. FAHR97-61: NOTIFICATION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SEWER LINE CLEANING OF THE 8 THRU 12 INCH DIAMETER LOCAL SEWERS IN THE IRVINE BUSINESS COMPLEX—SPECIFICATION NO. 9798-3 (District 7) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this information-only report. 9. FAHR97-62: DISTRICTS' ASSESSMENT AND REINVENTION TEAM (DART) PHASE III STATUS REPORT(All Districts): The Executive Summary for Phase III Status Report was prepared to update the Directors on the status of Phase III tasks. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this information-only report. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 1 through 9 under"Consent Calendar." ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 10 - 11) 10. FAHR97-63: SECURITY SERVICES—SPECIFICATION NO. P-177 (All Districts): COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, gave the presentation and answered questions from the Committee. He advised that for the past six years the Districts has out sourced the security at the Plants. For the past four years, Wakenhut has been the security contractor. The bid received for our current proposal is for security to cover both plants on a 24-hour basis . One guard will be stationed at Plant 1 between the hours of 5:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. There will be one period in the morning and afternoon when the guard shack will be vacant and the guard will make complete rounds of both plants. Between the hours of 5:30 p.m. and 5:30 a.m., and all day Saturday and Sunday, the guard service will provide continual rounds of both treatment plants. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 September 10, 1997 Q During discussion, Mr. Hodges and Operations and Maintenance Director Bob Dolan, described past incidents of theft at the Plants and past nuisance incidents at Plant 2. General Counsel reviewed some provisions in the Districts' Purchasing Resolution, internal bidding policies and the authority of the Purchasing/Contracts Administrator, in order to provide the Committee with some alternatives. After lengthy discussion, the Committee felt that it would be a better insurance measure to retain a guard at each plant, since we have hundreds of millions of dollars in Plant assets, and, therefore, it would not be prudent to reduce security to such a low level. Mr. Hodges pointed out that two full-time guards would require an increase in the budget for these services. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1) Authorize the Purchasing/Contracts Administrator to renegotiate the proposed contract with Wakenhut Corporation for the services of two security guards, for a one-year period beginning September 16, 1997, with the provisions for four (4) one-year extensions, in an amount not to exceed the estimated annual cost of$200,000, and 2) Leave it to the discretion of the Purchasing/Contracts Administrator to rebid the project, if necessary 11. FAHR97-48: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER (All Districts) COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Director of Finance Gary Streed provided the Committee with an overview and history of the Districts' investment program. This item was considered by the Joint Boards at their meeting of July 30. The Directors sent the proposed policy back to the FAHR Committee for further study and consideration, to be brought back to the Boards in September, and placed a moratorium on investing in reverse repurchase agreements until they consider approving the final policy. The Committee was reminded that at the Board meeting, Director Spitzer and others expressed concern regarding the appropriateness of using reverse repurchase agreements in our policy. Mr. Streed advised that many of the Boards' questions have been answered in the staff report. Mr. Streed further advised the Committee that a limited number of copies of the publication, "An Elected Official's Guide to Investing; published by the GFOA, are available to the Directors, upon request, and were originally distributed to them several months ago. The Committee took considerable time to review the Districts' Investment Policy document and investing mechanisms such as reverse repurchase agreements. Mr. Streed, Mr. Kozak, Rita Seymour of PIMCO, and General Counsel Tom Woodruff, answered questions from the Committee and representatives from the City of Anaheim, in detail regarding the Districts' investment policies and defined investment terms. The Committee briefly discussed PIMCO's credentials as one of the country's top financial investment firms, their investment strategies relating to public clients such as the Sanitation Districts, and their function in making the actual investment decisions in accordance with the Boards' policy. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 7 September 10, 1997 MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried with 6 Ayes and 3 Nos. to: 1. Approve the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, including the revisions recommended in the staff report. 2. Renew the delegation of investment authority to the Districts' Director of Financelrreasurer for 1997-98. 3. Recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 97-XX for adoption of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, and renewal of investment authority for 1997-98. 4. The Districts may enter into short-term (90-day) reverse repurchase agreements upon the recommendation of our external money managers, with a report back to the Committee; and 5. The Districts may not enter into long-term reverse repurchase agreements without approval of the Joint Boards of Directors. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS None. CLOSED SESSION None. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY None. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING None. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT None. FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 8, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 8 September 10, 1997 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Submitted by: �ra Crane Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Secretary H1WP.DTATIN 2 l0\CRANEWAHRTAHR.9rZEPTW9N&97DOC ❑ FO.ITEM AGENDA ❑ ccAF,I.ACTIDN rtEM n ❑ J SOS,CONSENT ITEM ❑ Jr.BDS.DISCUSSION (NCNLDtISENT) TRANSMITTAL ❑ PUBLIC HEPRING �" Ji.INDS.MEETe1G DATE JT.80.5.PGENDA REM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMITS OMTS (Oripinalor) PDC PDC FAHR 09/10/97 FAHR ALL 210,Gary G.Streed,Ext.2500 EXEC EXEC STEER: DNlabn No.,Now,and Extension JTSDS: 0924197 STEER AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 1997 (All Districts) Recommended Actionis): 1. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of August 1997. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination riled on CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENT YEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES Tnn.enl TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:S N/A WA N/A N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Sclnedulell.me Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item. TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISEDTOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS An PROJECT BUDGET First Year In Budget. N/A N/A N/A $0.00 Master Plan Estimate. Year of First Costs'. THIS AITIVENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT WA N/A N/A $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION?NOT APPLICABLE If YES,state numEer: Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Maclean qi�Wl"7 Page 1 of 2 PLEADOATA2\WP OTAtFIN\1210\CRANETAHR\FAHR 9MEPT\FAHR97-54.DOC r1 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Lisa: 9 5EPT9} 1. Monthly Investment Reports. ,Origin r Date 2. MonIhIY Traneacaon Repod. y ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) CONCURRENCES: 1. Monthly Imeshnent Reports. 2. MonthlyTransaction Report. Signature Date DM ' Mel ag Or 9/ 77 S e Date pertm sl e Signature Date Assistant General Menager( r Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background andlor Summary) Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO),has served as the Districts' professional external money manager,and Mellon Trust as the Districts'third-party custodian, since September 1995. The Districts' Investment Policy,adopted by the Joint Boards,includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the"Liquid Operating Monies"and for the"Long-Term Operating Monies." All of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with. Historical cost and the current market("mark-to-market")values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. The Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts'adopted Investment Policy,and the California Government Code. In addition,sufficient funds are available for the Districts to meet Its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the Districts' funds at month-end. Book Balances EsOmated Funds/Accounts August 31, 1997 - Yield I%) State of Call.LAIF $10,038,921 5.6 Union Bank Checking Account 244,504 5.1 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 2,354,000 5.1 Bank of America Checking Account 78,062 4.4 Bank of America Money Market Account 126,116 4.1 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 17,078,879 5.4 PIMCO-Lon&term Portfolio 289,456,527 5.0 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 4,230 5.3 Debt Service Reserves C Trustees 33,112.905 6.2 Petty Cash 4,400 N/A Deferred Compensation 11,199.848 (1.69}22.23 TOTAL $ 698,380 Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition,a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of August 1997 is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report,yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings,as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust,the Districts' custodian bank,is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. GGS:Ic A Ww Page 2 of 1LLEADUMTA2WP.DTALFINL72101CRANEWAHR'FAHR.9TSEPTIFAHR9754.DOC MONTHLY REPORT e COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 August 1997) Liquid Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: $17,079,388 peon $17,078,879 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $17,079,388 • Mellon $17,081,256 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.09 Of Index: 0.20 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1% Change: $15,560 0.09% 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 100% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return (%): 1 Month: 0.47 3 Months: 1.40 12 Months: 5.56 Year-to-Date: 3.71 Index Total Rate of Return(%): 1 Month: 0.43 H.L..WINANCEU210W0ZAKVQ0897."T MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 August 1997) Long Term Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: 660 MCono 289,456,527 • Mellon 289,456,527 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $361,353,133 • Mellon $355,770,070 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.42 Of Index: 2.40 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1% Chan e: $7,150,725 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (0/") 1 Month: (0.04) 3 Months: 2.36 12 Months: 8.52 Year-to-Date: 4.72 Index Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: (0.14) N: ..IFINANCEA2210WOLML-70897APT c i OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE USD 31-AUG-1997 H81100 % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.12 0.12 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2 073,477.59 2,073,477.59 11.99% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 3:071,130.06 3,071,130.06 17.76% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 2 749,380.44 2,748 380.44 15.90% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 2:645,143.67 2,645:143.67 15.30% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 2,960,326.67 2,960 326.67 17.12% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 179,876.00 179:876.00 1.04% 0.00 6,745.35 3.7S __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 13,678,334.55 13,678,334.55 79.12% 0.00 6,74S.35 0.05 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,402,921.88 3,400,544.00 19.67% -2,377.88 195,500.00 5.75 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- --------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,402,921.88 3,400,544.00 19.67% -2,377.88 195,500.00 5.75 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 208,817.28 208,817.28 1.21% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________ ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 208,817.28 208,817.28 1.21% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 17,290,073.71 17 287,695.83 100.00% -2,377.88 202,245.35 1.17 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-AUG-1997 Halloo % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.06 0.06 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -65,336,150.76 -65,336,150.76 -22.15% 0.00 0.00 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - DOME 9,995,220.00 10,002,486.20 3.39% 7,266.20 5951000.00 5.95 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 20,914 424.27 20,914,424.27 7.09% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSOT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 79:906.00 79,906.00 0.03% 0.00 2,996.48 3.75 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS -34,346,600.43 -34,339,334.23 -11.64% 7,266.20 597,996.48 -1.74 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 154,329,122.99 154,350,920.00 52.33% 21,797.01 10,385,000.00 6.73 U.S. AGENCIES 121 938 656.00 121.343,426.00 41.14% -595,230.00 8,023.890.00 6.61 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 11:055:361.77 11,096,469.50 3.76% 31,107.73 735,107.29 6.63 BANKING & FINANCE 27,553,599.00 27,477,746.00 9.32% -75,853.00 2.848.315.00 6.73 INDUSTRIAL 9,903,780.00 9,537,300.00 3.23% -366,480.00 832,500.00 8.73 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 324,780,519.76 323,79S,861.SO 109.79% -984,658.26 21,824,812.29 6.74 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 5,477,854.81 5,477,8S4.81 1.86% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 5,477,8S4.81 5,477,854.81 1.86% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 295,911,774.14 294,934,382.08 100.00% -977,392.06 22,422,868.77 7.60 Page 1 0 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE x 1 OMFGTS11102 1997/08/31 RUN DATE i 09/OS/97 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUM TINE x 10.62.06 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH R CASH EQUIVALENTS 179,876.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 179,876.00 1.31 99%9S906 PUBLIC II 179,876.00 1.05 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MG CORP DISC 5.478 .000 P-1 98.%6 2,574,706.67 17.36 313397LG4 MAT 09/04/1997 2,374,706.67 13.90 3,000,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NTS 5.485 .000 P-1 98.678 2,960,326.67 21.64 313313MB1 MAT 09/23/1997 2,960,326.67 17.33 300,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LM BK CONS DISC 5.500 .000 P-1 98.185 294,555.00 2.15 313USWS MAT 11/7/1997 294,555.00 1.72 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN M CONS DISC 5.524 .000 P-1 97.941 2,350,588.67 17.18 313385PJ9 MAT 11/17/1997 2,350,588.67 13.76 800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.542 .000 MR 99.070 792,558.00 5.79 36959NHN6 09/17/2997 792,558.00 4.64 2,800,000.00 FEDERAL HATL NTG ASSN DISC MS 5.542 .000 P-1 98.156 2,748,380.44 20.09 313589NE9 MAT 10/20/1997 2,748,380." 16.09 500,000.00 AMERICAN ER CR CP DISC 5.590 .000 P-1 96.577 492,882.92 3.60 02561RXF5 10/15/1997 492,882.92 2.89 700,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN NTG CORP DISC 5.603 .000 P-1 99.489 696,423.39 5.09 313397NO0 MAT 09/25/1997 696,423.59 4.08 800,000.00 FORD MR CR CO DISC 5.634 .000 MR 98.505 788,036.67 5.76 34539TK83 10/08/1997 788,036.67 4.61 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.385 .083 13,678,334.43 100.00 13,678,334.43 80.07 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.340 5.749 AM 100.016 3,402,921.88 100.00 912827V33 05.750% 09/30/1997 DO 10/02/95 3,400,544.00 19.91 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE , 2 OCSF07511192 1997/00/32 RUN DATE , 09/05/97 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIRE , 10.52.06 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 2 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.340 5.749 3,402,921.08 100.00 - 3,400,5 .00 19.91 ________ _______ _________________ --------- TOTAL 5.383 .309 17,081,256.31 100.00 11,078,878.43 100.00 a S YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE t 3 OMF07522202 1997/08/31 RUN DATE 09/OS/97 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATING RUN TIM 10.52.06 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH R CASH EQUIVALENTS 79,906.00 BSOT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 79,906.00 .25 999495906 PUBLIC I1 79,906.00 .02 7,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.564 .000 P-1 96.673 7,104,474.00 22.92 63743CYE7 11/14/1997 7,104,474.00 2.00 1,500,000.00 DU PONT DE REHOUR DISC S.ME .000 P-1 98.472 1,4n,OB3.33 4.76 26354AXF6 10/15/1997 1,477,083.33 .42 1,500,000.00 UNITED PARCEL SVC DISC 5.603 .000 P-1 98.167 1,472,500.00 4.75 91130TZ50 12/05/1997 1,472,500.00 .42 6,800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.609 .000 P-1 98.572 6,702,870.% 21.62 63743CYD9 11/13/1997 6,702,870.94 1.69 10,000,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 6.000 5.%9 100.025 9,995,220.00 32.26 0663JOKU7 05.950Z 06/19/1998 DO 06/19/97 10,002,486.20 2.82 4.200,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 26.289 .000 P-1 98.988 4,157,496.00 13.41 O2581RNC3 09/12/1997 4,157,496.00 1.17 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH A CASH EQUIVALENTS 6.488 1.202 30,989,550.27 100,00 30,996,816.47 8.74 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 30,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FNLHC -.011 7.075 AAA 98.937 30,301,562.50 9.16 999ASH290 7.000Z 09/15/2027 29,681,100.00 8.37 4,000,000.00 FORD MR CR HTN TRANCKE RTR 96 .000 5.784 Al 100.444 3,970,480.00 1.24 345402DZ1 FLTG/RT 11/09/19" DO 11/08/93 4,017,760.00 1.13 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR HTN TR R 00177 .000 5.874 Al 99.765 6,999,748.00 2.15 345402W3 VAR/RT 03/30/2999 DO 03/30/94 7,083,315.00 2.00 35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.960 6.013 AAA 99.750 35,034,860.00 10.78 912627302 WOODY. 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 54,912,500.00 9.64 24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.01E 6.329 AAA 100.754 24,216,257.92 7.46 9128272T8 06.375Z 05/LS/2000 DO 05/15/97 24,176,160.00 6.81 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 4 OOF07322202 1997108M RUN DATE 09/OS/97 ONAIiE CTY-LOH6 TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.52.06 PAR VAGUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ __-------- 28,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.131 6.435 AAA 101.016 28,425,466.75 8.73 912827"1 06.500% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 28,284,480.00 7.97 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 6.162 9.000 AAA 123.609 6,233,593.75 1.90 912810DES 11.125% 08/IS/2003 DO 07/OS/83 6,180,450.00 1.74 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.277 6.246 AAA 100.062 4,9%,531.25 1.54 91WZ72LS 06.250X 02/28/2002 DO OV26/97 5,003,100.00 1.41 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSM MTM 6.292 6.257 AAA 99.562 4,488,705.00 1.38 31364CXV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 OD 03/03/97 4,480,290.00 1.26 39,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DOS 6.305 6.512 AAA 99.656 39,890,500.00 12.28 3133915B6 6.490% 09/13/2000 DO 09/23/95 39,463,776.00 11.12 1,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN 8 TR 00491 6.305 7.629 A2 100.794 1,031,860.00 .32 81238% 7.690% OV27/1998 DO 02/28/95 1,007,%0.00 .28 4,500,000.00 CATERPILLAR FINL NTNS TR00389 6.322 5.801 A2 99.643 4,466,745.00 1.38 14912LSE2 8.780% 07/15/1998 DO 12/15/95 4,483,935.00 1.26 4,788,931.95 GNMA II POOL 20080023 6.375 6.356 AAA 102.266 4,968,248.64 1.51 3622.SCAZ9 6.500X IV20/2026 DO 12/O1/96 4,897,449.15 1.38 34,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.391 7.485 AAA 103.547 35,302,165.70 10.57 912827529 07.750% 11/30/2999 DO 11/30/% 35,205,980.00 9.92 1,000,000.00 CNRYSLER FINL MTN TR 0 00335 6.514 6.248 A3 100.200 993,260.00 .30 171200PY1 6.260X 07/20/1998 OD 07/18/95 1,002,000.00 .28 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.516 6.335 AAA 100.625 4,975,781.25 1.53 91M2n49 06.375X 03/31/2001 DO 04/10/96 510311250.00 1.42 3,700,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP MTH TR00324 6.532 8.123 A3 103.104 3,911,640.00 1.17 37042RPM8 8.375% OUO3/1999 DO 0/03/95 3,814,848.00 1.08 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.553 6.662 AAA 101.328 5,019,140.62 1.56 912827047 06.7507. 06/30/1999 DO 06/30/94 5,066,400.00 1.43 6,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSM NTN 6.577 6.564 AAA 100.922 8,012,576.00 2.49 31364CBD9 6.6257. 04/18/2001 DO 04/18/96 8,073,760.00 2.28 2,900,000.00 CNRYSLER FINL MTN TR 8 00306 6.591 7.214 A3 100.772 2,952,896.00 .90 1712D0RT4 7.270% 04/13/1998 DO 04/13/95 21922,588.00 .82 a t YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 5 OMF07522202 1997/08/31 RUN DATE : 09/O5/97 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIME : 10.52.06 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY IO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOM YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 6.593 8.729 A2 105.970 9,903,760.00 2.% 718154BB2 9.2502 02/15/2000 9,537,300.00 2.69 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MG ASSN MN 6.636 5.783 AAA 97.531 9,593,750.00 3.01 31364BMF3 5.6407. OU20/2001 OD OV20/96 9,753,100.00 2.75 3,000,000.00 G M A C NED TERM CUTS 6.660 8.226 A3 104.852 3,227,070.00 .97 37042RKQ4 8.6257. 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 3,145,560.00 .89 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MG CORP DEBS 6.713 6.123 AAA 97.628 4,851,562.50 1.51 3134AOXN8 5.990X 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/96 4,891,400.00 1.38 25,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MG DEB 6.720 6.720 AM I00.000 25,000,000.00 7.72 31MAOMQ2 6.720% 101OV2000 DD 10/02/95 25,000,000.00 7.05 10,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.756 7.388 AM 104.906 10,327,M3.75 3.23 912827ZX3 07.7501 OV/ 12001 DD 02/15/91 10,490,600.00 2.96 6,034,667.28 GNMA I1 POOL 6080088M 6.828 6.848 AM 102.219 6,187,113.13 1.91 36225CG20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 6,189,020.35 1.74 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4.946 6.634 324,780,519.76 100.00 323,795,861.50 91.26 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 4.975 6.533 355,770,070.03 100.00 354,792,677.97 100.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST t, CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE OS-AUG-1997 -6.00 -6.00 0.000000 NA9123459 ----------- -6.00 0.00 0.000000 cW ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 2S-AUG-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 313385LH7 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW MAT 09/05/1997 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 2S-AUG-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 313385LH7 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw MAT 09/05/1997 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 14-AUG-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 3134AOWWS FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBS ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 5.990% 03/06/2001 DD 03/06/96 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 12-AUG-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827R20 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.875% OB/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 25-AUG-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827S45 U 5 TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 07.750% 12/31/1999 DO 01/03/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 21-AUG-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128273D2 U 5 TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/1S/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 15-AUG-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 99341T809 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.500% 08/1S/1997 DO 08/11/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 25-AUG-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 993412367 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.400% 08/2S/1997 DO 08/19/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 400 000.00 AMERITECH CORP Disc 12-AUG-1997 -399,814.67 -399,814.67 99.953666 02680JVF5 08/15/1997 12-AUG-1997 399,814.67 399,814.67 99.953666 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400'000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 12-AUG-1997 -399,81467 -399,814.67 99.953666 026803VFS 08/1S/1997 12-AUG-1997 -399,814:67 0.00 99.9S3666 PC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 12-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-AUG-1997 -696,42339 -696 423.39 99.489055 313397MDO MAT 09/25/1997 22-AUG-1997 696,423:39 696:423.39 99.489055 8 FIRST CHICAGO CAPITAL MARKETS, ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-AUG-1997 -696,42339 -696,423.39 99.489055 313397MDO MAT 09/25/1997 22-AUG-1997 -696,423:39 0.00 99.48905S PC FIRST CHICAGO CAPITAL MARKETS, 22-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-AUG-1997 -4,982,686.11 -4 982,686.11 99.653722 313589LP6 MAT 09/11/1997 29-AUG-1997 4,982,686.11 4:982,686.11 99.653722 8 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-AUG-1997 -4 982 686.11 -4,982,686.11 99.653722 313589LP6 MAT 09/11/1997 19-AUG-1997 -4:982:686.11 0.00 99.653722 PC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 19-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-AUG-1997 -5,974,753.33 -5,974,753.33 99.579222 313589LUS MAT 09/16/1997 19-AUG-1997 S,974,753.33 5,974,753.33 99.579222 B BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA, SAN F ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-AUG-1997 -5,974,7S3.33 -5,974,753.33 99.579222 Page 2 a OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 313589LU5 MAT 09/16/1997 19-AUG-1997 -5,974,753.33 0.00 99.579222 FC BANK OF AMERICA NT 8, SA, SAN F 19-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500'000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 22-AUG-1997 -499,471.11 -499,471.11 99.894222 34539TVV4 08/29/1997 22-AUG-1997 499.471.11 499,471.11 99.894222 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 22-AUG-1997 -499,471.11 -499,471.11 99.894222 34539Tvv4 08/29/1997 22-AUG-1997 -499,471.11 0.00 99.894222 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 22-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 13-AUG-1997 -99,142.89 -99,142.89 99.142888 34539TX83 10/08/1997 13-AUG-1997 99,142.89 99,142.89 99.142888 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 13-AUG-1997 -99,142.89 -99,142.89 99.142888 34539TX83 10/08/1997 13-AUG-1997 -99,142.89 0.00 99.142888 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 13-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-AUG-1997 -6,704,422.22 -6,704,422.22 98.594444 36959HYK7 11/19/1997 19-AUG-1997 6,704,422.22 6,704,422.22 98.594444 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6.800.000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-AUG-1997 -6.704,422.22 -6,704,422.22 98.594444 36959HYK7 11/19/1997 19-AUG-1997 -6,704,422.22 0.00 98.594444 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 19-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 11-AUG-1997 -2,168,348.11 -2,168,348.11 98.561278 63743CYD9 11/13/1997 11-AUG-1997 2,168,348.11 2,169,348.11 98.561278 B LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI) - ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 11-AUG-1997 -2,168,348.11 -2,168,348.11 98.561278 63743CYD9 11/13/1997 11-AUG-1997 -2,168,348.11 0.00 98.561278 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 11-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,600,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 11-AUG-1997 -4,534,522.83 -4,S34,522.83 98.576583 63743CYD9 11/13/1997 12-AUG-1997 4,534,S22.83 4,534,522.83 98.S76583 B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,600,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 11-AUG-1997 -4,S34,522.83 -4,534,S22.83 98.576583 63743CYO9 11/13/1997 12-AUG-1997 -4,S34,522.83 0.00 98.S76583 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 12-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 19-AUG-1997 -7,104,474.00 -7,104,474.00 98.673250 63743CYE7 11/14/1997 19-AUG-1997 7,104,474.00 7,104,474.00 98.673250 B BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA, SAN F ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 19-AUG-1997 -7,104,474 00 -7,104,474.00 98.673250 63743CYE7 11/14/1997 19-AUG-1997 -7,104,474:00 0.00 98.673250 FC BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA, SAN F 19-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1.500,000.00 UNITED PARCEL SVC DISC 06-AUG-1997 -1,472,500.00 -1,472,500.00 98.166667 9113OT2S0 12/OS/1997 07-AUG-1997 1,472,S00.00 1,472,S00.00 98.166667 e GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 UNITED PARCEL SVC DISC 06-AUG-1997 -1,472,S00.00 -1,472,500.00 98.166667 91130TZSO 12/05/1997 07-AUG-1997 -1,472,500.00 0.00 98.166667 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 07-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 WARNER LAMBERT CO DISC 25-AUG-1997 -5,196,833.78 -5,196.833.78 99.939111 93449AVV0 08/29/1997 25-AUG-1997 S,196,833.78 S,196,833.78 99.939111 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,200,000.00 WARNER LAMBERT CO DISC 25-AUG-1997 -5,196,833.78 -5,196,833.78 99.939111 93449AVVO 08/29/1997 25-AUG-1997 -5,196,833.78 0.00 99.939111 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34.500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 11-AUG-1997 -34,500,000.00 -34,S00,000.00 100.000000 Page 4 • OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 99341T809 05.500% 08/1S/1997 DD 08/11/97 11-AUG-1997 34,500,000.00 34,500,000.00 100.000000 8 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 34,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 11-AUG-1997 -34,S00,000 00 -34,500,000.00 100.000000 99341T809 05.500% 08/15/1997 DO 08/11/97 11-AUG-1997 -34,500,000:00 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 11-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,200.000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 19-AUG-1997 -11,200,000.00 -11,200,000.00 100.000000 993412367 05.400% 08/25/1997 DO 08/19/97 19-AUG-1997 11,200,000.00 11,200,000.00 100.000000 B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,200,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 19-AUG-1997 -11,200,000.00 -11,200,000.00 100.000000 99341Z367 OS.400% 08/25/1997 DD 08/19/97 19-AUG-1997 -11,200.000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 19-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 637.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-AUG-1997 -637.00 -637.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-AUG-1997 637.00 637.00 1.000000 B 01-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 78,608.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-AUG-1997 -78,608.00 -78,608.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC I1 01-AUG-1997 78,608.00 78,608.00 1.000000 e 01-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 1.957.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- OS-AUG-1997 -1,9S7.00 -1,957.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 05-AUG-1997 1,9S7.00 1,957.00 1.000000 B OS-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 30,100.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 07-AUG-1997 -30,10000 -30,100.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 07-AUG-1997 30,100:00 30,100.00 1.000000 B 07-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 63,820.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 08-AUG-1997 -63,820.00 -63,820.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 08-AUG-1997 63,820.00 63,820.00 1.000000 B 08-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 5 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 47,611.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 12-AUG-1997 -47,611.00 -47,611.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 12-AUG-1997 47,611.00 47,611.00 1.000000 B 12-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,136,939.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 15-AUG-1997 -1,136,939.00 -1,136,939.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC I1 15-AUG-1997 1,136,939.00 1,136,939.00 1.000000 e 15-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 282,000.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 20-AUG-1997 -282,000.00 -282,000.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC 11 20-AUG-1997 282,000.00 282,000.00 1.000000 B 20-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3577.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 22-AUG-1997 -3.577.00 -3,577.00 1.000000 994495906 PUBLIC 11 22-AUG-1997 3,577.00 3,577.00 1.000000 B 22-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,833,327.6E GNMA 1I POOL #0080023 08-AUG-1997 -4 913,379.64 -4,913,379.64 101.656250 36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 25-AUG-1997 4:913,379.64 4,913,379.64 101.656250 8 CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NV ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,833,327.65 GNMA II POOL #0080023 08-AUG-1997 -20,944.42 -20,944.42 101.656250 36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 101.656250 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,833,327.65 GNMA II POOL #0080023 08-AUG-1997 4,913,379.64 4,913,379.64 101.6562SO 36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 25-AUG-1997 -4,913,379.64 -4,913,379.64 101.656250 BC CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,833,327.6E GNMA II POOL #0080023 08-AUG-1997 20,944.42 20,944.42 101.656250 36225CAZ9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 101.656250 IBC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 6 c OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 4,788,931.9S GNMA II POOL #0080023 08-AUG-1997 -4,869,248.64 -4,868,248.64 101.656250 36225CA29 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 2S-AUG-1997 4,868,248.64 4,868,248.64 101.656250 B CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A. NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,788 931.95 GNMA Il POOL #0080023 08-AUG-1997 -20,752.04 -20,7S2.04 101.656250 3612ScAz9 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 101.656250 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,788 931.95 GNMA II POOL #0080023 08-AUG-1997 -4,889 000.68 -4,889,000.68 101.656250 36H5CA29 6.500% 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 25-AUG-1997 -4,889:000.69 0.00 101.656250 PC CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NY 25-AW-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,OS4 667.28 GNMA II POOL #080088M 11-AUG-1997 -6,187 113.13 -6,187,113.13 102.187500 36125CC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 25-AUG-1997 6,187:113.13 6,187,113.13 102.187S00 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,054 667.28 GNMA 11 POOL #080088M 11-AUG-1997 -28,255.11 -28,255.11 102.187500 3612SCC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 102.187500 Ie ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 6,054,667.28 GNMA II POOL #080088M 11-AUG-1997 -6,215,368.24 -6,215.368.24 102.187500 3622SCC20 7.000% 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 25-AUG-1997 -6,215,368.24 0.00 102.187S00 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 04-AUG-1997 -6,233,S93.75 -6,233,593.75 124.671875 912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 05-AUG-1997 6.233,593.75 6,233,593.75 124.67187S B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 04-AUG-1997 -262,758.98 -262,758.98 124.671875 912810DES 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 05-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 124.671875 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 04-AUG-1997 -6,496 352 73 -6,496,352.73 124.671875 912810DE5 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/05/83 05-AUG-1997 -6,496:352:73 0.00 124.671875 PC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM OS-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 7 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE WIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 11-AUG-1997 -4 994,531.25 -4,994 531.25 99.890625 9128272L5 06.250% 02/28/2002 DD 02/28/97 12-AUG-1997 4:994,531.25 4,994:531.25 99.890625 B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 11-AUG-1997 -140,115.49 -140,115.49 99.990625 9128272LS 06.250% 02/28/2002 DO 02/28/97 12-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 99.890625 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 11-AUG-1997 -5,134,646.74 -5,134,646.74 99.890625 9128272L5 06.250% 02/28/2002 DD 02/28/97 12-AUG-1997 -5,134,646.74 0.00 99.890625 FC LEHMAN BROS INC 12-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997 -24,759,930.52 -24,759,930.52 101.330100 9128272T8 06.375% OS/15/2000 DD OS/15/97 29-AUG-1997 -24,759,930.52 0.00 101.330100 FC LEHMAN BROS INC 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17.000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1997 -17,26S 62S.00 -17,265,625.00 101.562500 9128272w1 06.S00% 05/31/2002 DO O6/02/97 OS-AUG-1997 17,265:625.00 17,265,625.00 101.562500 B CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,000,ODO.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1997 -193.224.04 -193,224.04 101.562500 9128272w1 06.500% OS/31/2002 DD O6/02/97 OS-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 101.562SO0 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17.000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1997 -17,458,849.04 -17,458,849.04 101.562500 9128272WI 06.500% OS/31/2002 DO 06/02/97 05-AUG-1997 -17,458,849.04 0.00 101.562500 FC CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A. NY OS-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES O8-AUG-1997 -34,866,015.63 -34.866 015.63 99.617187 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO O8/15/97 IS-AUG-1997 34,866,015.63 34,866:015.63 99.617187 B MORGAN I P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 8 e OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 35,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-AUG-1997 -34,866,015.63 -34,866,015.63 99.617187 91f82739)2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 15-AUG-1997 -34,866,015.63 0.00 99.617187 PC MORGAN I P SECS INC, NEW YORK 15-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-AUG-1997 -35,034,860.00 -35,034,860.00 100.099600 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/15/97 19-SEP-1997 35,034,860.00 35,034,860.00 100.099600 B HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-AUG-1997 -199,728.26 -199,728.26 100.099600 9128273o2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DD 08/SS/97 19-SEP-1997 0.00 0.00 100.099600 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 17-JUL-1997 -20,237,500.00 -20,237,500.00 101.187500 999AB7818 7.000% 08/15/2002 21-AUG-1997 -20,237,500.00 0.00 101.187500 PC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 21-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 06-AUG-1997 -20,200,000.00 -20,200,000.00 101.000000 999ABM290 7.000% 09/15/2027 22-SEP-1997 20,200,000.00 20,200,000.00 101.000000 B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 10,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC O8-AUG-1997 -9,901,562 50 -9,901,562.50 99.015625 999ABM290 7.000% 09/1S/2027 11-SEP-1997 9,901,562:50 9,901,562.50 99.015625 B GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 29-AUG-1997 98,988.00 98,988.00 98.988000 02S81RWC3 09/12/1997 29-AUG-1997 -98,988.00 -98,988.00 98.988000 S GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 29-AUG-1997 794.22 794.22 98.988000 02581RWC3 09/12/1997 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 98.988000 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 29-AUG-1997 99,782.22 99,782.22 98.988000 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV WIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 02581Rwc3 09/12/1997 29-AUG-1997 99,782.22 0.00 98.988000 PC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC OS-AUG-1997 2,375,712.00 2,375,712.00 98.988000 026807VN8 08/22/1997 05-AUG-1997 -2,377,880.00 -2,377,880.00 98.988000 S LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI)- ----------- -2,168.00 -2,168.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC OS-AUG-1997 18,054.67 18,054.67 98.988000 026807VN8 08/22/1997 05-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 98.988000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,400,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC OS-AUG-1997 2 393,766.67 2,393,766.67 98.988000 026801VN8 08/22/1997 05-AUG-1997 2:393,766.67 0.00 98.988000 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 05-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,800 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 05-AUG-1997 1,785,796 00 1,78S,796.00 99.210889 315385LH7 MAT 09/05/1997 OS-AUG-1997 -1,785,796:00 -1,785,796.00 99.210889 5 MORGAN O P SECS INC, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS DISC 05-AUG-1997 5,818.50 5,818.50 99.210889 313385LH7 MAT 09/05/1997 05-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 99.210889 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,800 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 05-AUG-1997 1,791,614 50 1,791,514.50 99.210889 315385LH7 MAT 09/05/1997 05-AUG-1997 1,791,614:50 0.00 99.210889 FC MORGAN I P SECS INC, NEW YORK 05-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 29-AUG-1997 4,982,686.11 4,982,686.11 99.653722 313589LP6 MAT 09/11/1997 29-AUG-1997 -4,982.686.11 -4,982,686.11 99.653722 S GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000 000.00 FEDERAL MATL MTG ASSN DISC 29-AUG-1997 7,419.45 7,419.45 99.653722 313589LP6 MAT 09/12/1997 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 99.653722 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 30 q u OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 29-AUG-1997 4,990,105.56 4,990,105.56 99.653722 313589LP6 MAT 09/11/1997 29-AUG-1997 4,990,105.56 0.00 99.653722 PC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 29-AUG-1997 5,974,753.33 5,974,753.33 99.579222 31AS89LUS MAT 09/16/1997 29-AUG-1997 -5,974,753.33 -5,974,753.33 99.579222 S GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 29-AUG-1997 8,806.67 8,806.67 99.579222 313S89LU5 MAT 09/16/1997 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 99.579222 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,000 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 29-AUG-1997 5,983,560.00 5,983,560.00 99.579222 M589LU5 MAT 09/16/1997 29-AUG-1997 5,983,560.00 0.00 99.579222 PC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700 000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 29-AUG-1997 690,170.39 690,170.39 98.595770 3409TX83 10/08/1997 29-AUG-1997 -690,170.39 -690,170.39 98.595770 S LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI)- ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 29-AUG-1997 5,512.94 5,512.94 98.595770 34539TX83 10/08/1997 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 98.595770 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -700 000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 29-AUG-1997 695,68333 695,683.33 98.595770 34139Tx83 10/08/1997 29-AUG-1997 695,683:33 0.00 98.595770 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,800 000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 29-AUG-1997 6,704 422.22 6,704,422.22 98.594444 36959HYK7 11/19/1997 29-AUG-1997 -6,704:422.22 -6,704,422.22 98.594444 S GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6,800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 29-AUG-1997 9,614.45 9,614.45 98.594444 Page 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR WIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 36959HYK7 11/19/1997 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 98.594444 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -6.800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 29-AUG-1997 6,714,036.67 6,714,036.67 98.594444 36959HYK7 11/19/1997 29-AUG-1997 6,714,036.67 0.00 99.594444 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC 05-AUG-1997 395 190.00 395,190.00 98.797500 72447GW79 09/18/1997 05-AUG-1997 -395:190.00 -395,190.00 98.797500 S GOLD14AN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC OS-AUG-1997 2,116.22 2,116.22 98.797500 72447GW79 09/18/1997 05-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 98.797500 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC 05-AUG-1997 397 30622 397,306.22 98.797500 72447GW79 09/18/1997 05-AUG-1997 397:306:22 0.00 99.797500 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 05-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,500 000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 15-AUG-1997 34,500,000.00 34,S00,000.00 100.000000 99A41T809 OS.500% 08/15/1997 DO 08/11/97 15-AUG-1997 -34,S00,000.00 -34,S00,000.00 100.000000 5 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,50D,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 15-AUG-1997 21,083.33 21,083.33 100.000000 99341T809 05.500% 08/15/1997 DO 08/11/97 15-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,500,000.00 LEHMAN BROTHERS REPO 15-AUG-1997 34,522,083.33 34,521,083.33 100.000000 99341T809 05.500% 08/15/1997 DO 08/11/97 15-AUG-1997 34,521,083.33 0.00 100.000000 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC, NY 15-AUG-2997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,200,000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 25-AUG-1997 11,200,000.00 11,200,000.00 100.000000 993412367 05.400% 08/25/1997 DO 08/19/97 25-AUG-1997 -11.200,000.00 -11,200,000.00 100.000000 S FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 12 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,200 000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 25-AUG-1997 10,080.00 10,080.00 100.000000 99'i41z367 OS.400% 08/25/1997 DO 08/19/97 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 100.000000 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -11,200 000.00 FIRST BOSTON CORP REPO 25-AUG-1997 11,210,08000 11,210,080.00 100.000000 99A412367 05.400% 08/25/1997 DO 08/19/97 2S-AUG-1997 11,210,080:00 0.00 100.000000 PC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -29,982.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 11-AUG-1997 29,982.00 29,982.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 11-AUG-1997 -29,982.00 -29,982.00 1.000000 S 11-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -99 143.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 13-AUG-1997 99 143.00 99,143.00 1.000000 996495906 PUBLIC I1 13-AUG-1997 -99:143.00 -99,143.00 1.000000 S 13-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 • LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 14-AUG-1997 3.00 3.00 1.000000 999495905 PUBLIC II 14-AUG-1997 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S 14-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -888,822.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 19-AUG-1997 888 822.00 888 822.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC II 19-AUG-1997 -888:822.00 -888:822.00 1.000000 S 19-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12,SO3.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 21-AUG-1997 12,503.00 12,503.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 21-AUG-1997 -12,503.00 -12,SO3.00 1.000000 S 21-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -499 471.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 22-AUG-1997 499 471.00 499,471.00 1.000000 994495906 PUBLIC II 22-AUG-1997 -499:471.00 -499,471.00 1.000000 S 22-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,259.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 25-AUG-1997 9,259.00 9,259.00 1.000000 Page 13 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 MOO BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COWL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 999495906 PUBLIC II 2S-AUG-1997 -9,259.00 -9,259.00 1.000000 S 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -78 310.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 29-AUG-1997 78 320.00 78,310.00 1.000000 99449S906 PUBLIC I1 29-AUG-1997 -78:310.00 -78,310.00 1.000000 S 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBS 11-AUG-1997 9,857,031.25 9,857,031.25 98.S70312 3134AONN8 5.990% 03/06/2001 OD 03/06/96 12-AUG-1997 -9,703 125.00 -9,703,12S.00 98.S70312 S LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC. NY ----------- 153:906.25 153,906.25 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000 r 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBS 11-AUG-1997 259,566.67 259,566.67 98.S70312 3134AOWW6 5.990% 03/O6/2001 DD 03/O6/96 12-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 98.570312 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEBS 11-AUG-1997 10,116,S97.92 10,116,597.92 98.S70312 3134AONN8 S.990% 03/06/2001 DO 03/06/96 12-AUG-1997 10,116,S97.92 0.00 98.570312 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 12-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-AUG-1997 35,566,015.63 3S,566,015.63 101.617188 91f827R20 06.87S% 08/31/1999 0o 08/31/94 11-AUG-1997 -35,583 789.06 -3S,583,789.06 101.617188 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- -17:773.43 -17,773.43 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-AUG-1997 1,072,350.S4 1,072,3SO.S4 101.617188 91f827R20 06.87S% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 11-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 101.617188 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 08-AUG-1997 36,638 366 17 36,638,366.17 101.617188 911827R20 06.87S% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 11-AUG-1997 36,638:366:17 0.00 101.617188 FC LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC, NY 11-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,S00 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1997 19,234,218.7S 19,234,218.7E 103.9687SO 9h82754S 07.750% 12/31/1999 DD 01/03/95 05-AUG-1997 -19,065,117.19 -19,06S,117.19 103.9687SO S CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NY ----------- 169,101.56 169,101.56 1.000000000 Page 14 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV WIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB WIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1997 140,258.15 140,258.15 103.968750 912827S45 07.750% 12/31/1999 DO 01/03/95 05-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 103.9687SO IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -18,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 04-AUG-1997 19 374,476.90 19,374,476.90 103.968750 912827S4S 07.750% 12/31/1999 DO 01/03/95 OS-AUG-1997 19:374,476.90 0.00 103.9687SO PC CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NY 05-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO -35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-AUG-1997 3S,054,687.50 35 054,687.50 100.1562SO 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DO 08/1S/97 19-AUG-1997 -34,866,015.63 -34:866,015.63 100.156250 S HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, ----------- 288,671.87 188,671.87 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3S,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-AUG-1997 22,826.09 22,826.09 100.1562SO 912827302 06.000% 08/15/2000 DD 08/15/97 19-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 300.1S6250 is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 18-AUG-1997 35,077,513.59 3S,077,S13.59 100.1S62SO 9128273D2 06.000% 08/15/2000 DD 08/15/97 19-AUG-1997 3S,077,S13.59 0.00 100.156250 FC HONG KONG & SHANGHAI BKG CORP, 19-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000 000.00 COMMIT TO PUB FHLMC 06-AUG-1997 20,225,000.00 20,225,000.00 101.125000 994A81818 7.000% 08/15/2002 21-AUG-1997 -20,237,500.00 -20,237,500.00 101.125000 S FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- -12,500.00 -12,500.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000 000.00 COMMIT TO PUB FHLMC 06-AUG-1997 -20,225,000.00 -20,225,000.00 101.125000 994AB1818 7.000% 08/15/2002 21-AUG-1997 20,237,500.00 20,237 500.00 101.125000 SC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 12,500.00 12:500.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUB FHLMC 06-AUG-1997 20,225,000.00 20 22S,000.00 101.12S000 999AB1818 7.000% 08/15/2002 21-AUG-1997 -20,237,S00.00 -20:237,500.00 101.125000 S FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- -12,500.00 -12,500.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 15 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO FUR FHLMC 06-AUG-1997 20,22S,000.00 20,225,000.00 101.125000 999AB3818 7.000% 08/15/2002 21-AUG-1997 20,225,000.00 0.00 101.125000 PC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 21-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400 000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 15-AUG-1997 399,814.67 399,814.67 100.000000 029803VFS 08/15/1997 15-AUG-1997 -399.814.67 -399,814.67 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 1S-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700 000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-AUG-1997 696 34542 696,34S.42 100.000000 315397KT7 MAT 08/22/1997 22-AUG-1997 -696:345:42 -696,345.42 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 22-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 29-AUG-1997 499,471.11 499,471.11 100.000000 34S39TVV4 08/29/1997 29-AUG-1997 -499,471.11 -499,471.11 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,200,000.00 WARNER LAMBERT CO DISC 29-AUG-1997 5,196,833.78 5,196,833.78 100.000000 93449AvvO 08/29/1997 29-AUG-1997 -5,196,833.78 -5,196,833.78 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,S00,000.00 CHRYSLER CORP DEBS 07-AUG-1997 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 100.000000 171196ANS 10.400% 08/01/1999 DO 08/01/87 07-AUG-1997 -1,603,320.00 -1,603,320.00 100.000000 CAL ----------- -103,320.00 -103,320.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER CORP DEBS 07-AUG-1997 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 100.000000 171196AN8 10.400% 08/01/1999 OD 08/01/87 07-AUG-1997 1,500,000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 07-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HAOME LN BK CONS BDS 25-AUG-1997 5,000,000.00 51000,000.00 100.000000 3133MOFB2 6.5SO% OS/24/1999 DD 05/23/97 25-AUG-1997 -5,000,000.00 -S,000,000.00 100.000000 CAL ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 16 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HAOME LN SK CONS BDS 2S-AUG-1997 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.000000 313314OF62 6.550% 05/24/1999 DD 05/23/97 25-AUG-1997 5,000,000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HAOME LN BK CONS BDS 25-AUG-1997 -S,0001000.00 -5,000,000.00 100.000000 3133NOFB2 6.5S0% 05/24/1999 DD 05/23/97 25-AUG-1997 5,000,000.00 51000,000.00 100.000000 CAC ---- ------ 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HAOME LN BK CONS BDS 25-AUG-1997 -S,000,000.00 -5,000,000.00 100.000000 3133MOF82 6.550% 05/24/1999 DO 05/23/97 2S-AUG-1997 -5,000,000.00 0.00 100.000000 FCC 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HAOME LN SK CONS BDS 25-AUG-1997 5,000,000.00 51000,000.00 100.000000 3133MOF62 6.550% 05/24/1999 DO OS/23/97 25-AUG-1997 -5,000,000.00 -S,0001000.00 100.000000 CAL ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HAOME LN BK CONS BDS 25-AUG-1997 5,000,000.00 S,000,000.00 100.000000 3133MOFB2 6.SSD% 05/24/1999 DO 05/23/97 2S-AUG-1997 5,000.000.00 0.00 100.000000 FC 25-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 15-AUG-1997 185.33 185.33 0.000000 026803VFS 08/1S/1997 15-AUG-1997 185.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1.500,000.00 CHRYSLER CORP DEBS 01-AUG-1997 78,000.00 78,000.00 0.000000 171196ANS 10.400% 08/01/1999 DD 08/01/87 01-AUG-1997 78,000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 CHRYSLER CORP DEBS 07-AUG-1997 2,600.00 2,600.00 0.000000 171196ANS 10.400% 08/01/1999 DO 08/01/87 01-AUG-1997 2,600.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 07-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 17 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USO 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 FEDERAL HAOME LN BK CONS BDS 25-AUG-1997 81,87S.00 81,875.00 0.000000 3133MOFB2 6.S50% OS/24/1999 DO 05/23/97 2S-AUG-1997 81,875.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 2S-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 22-AUG-1997 3,654.58 3,654.58 0.000000 313397KT7 MAT 08/22/1997 22-AUG-1997 3,6S4.S8 0.00 0.000000 IT 22-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10.000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 20-AUG-1997 282 000.00 282,000.00 0.000000 313648WF3 S.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 20-AUG-1997 282:000.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO SO0,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 29-AUG-1997 S28.89 S28.89 0.000000 34539TVV4 08/29/1997 29-AUG-1997 S28.89 0.00 0.000000 IT 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,000 000.00 FORD MTR CR MTN TRANCHE NTR 96 08-AUG-1997 63,82027 63,820.27 0.000000 3414O2DZ1 FLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DO 11/08/93 08-AUG-1997 63,820:27 0.00 0.000000 IT 08-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT IS-AUG-1997 416,250.00 416,2SO.00 0.000000 718154882 9.250% 02/1S/2000 IS-AUG-1997 416,2SO.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BONDS 1S-AUG-1997 278 12S.00 278,125.00 0.000000 912810DES 11.125% 08/15/2003 DO 07/OS/83 15-AUG-1997 278:125.00 0.00 0.000000 IT IS-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES IS-AUG-1997 387,500.00 387,500.00 0.000000 91f827ZX3 07.750% 02/1S/2001 DO 02/iS/91 IS-AUG-1997 387,500.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 15-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 5,200,000.00 WARNER LAMBERT CO DISC 29-AUG-1997 3,166.22 3.166.22 0.000000 93449AVVO 08/29/1997 29-AUG-1997 3,166.22 0.00 0.000000 IT 29-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Page 18 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-AUG-1997 - 31-AUG-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-AUG-1997 608.41 608.41 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-AUG-1997 608.41 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 01-AUG-1997 636.69 636.69 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-AUG-1997 636.69 0.00 0.000000 IT 01-AUG-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 19 For Bd.See.Uaa On N AGENDA ❑ CDanl.Iroo.REM ITEM e ❑ COM ACTICNREM ❑ JT.BDS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL (NONODN9EtJn ❑ ,IBUC HEPRING d'I Jr.Dos.MEETING DATE Jr,SO$.AGENOAITEMNO. MEETING GATE COMM.to.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMITS: OMITS (Onglnator) PDC: POC FAHR: 9/10/97 FAHR 210,Steve Kozak,2504 EXEC: EXEC STEER: DMalon No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:924/97 STEER AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wording: INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1997 (All Districts) Recommended Action(s): 1. Receive and file this information-only report. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Neorthre Declaration Approved on 0122/97 Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination Bled on. CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO4DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGETAMOUNT TO4DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES Rom Bwa.I pl.. Tnmlenl TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ N/A N/A N/A N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS ScheduelLine Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schadula/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: N/A N/A N/A $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT N/A N/A N/A $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,state number: _Permanent _Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION wctlon It a 051e97 Page 1 of 2 H:\W P.DTATIN=10\CRANETAHR\FAHR.97\SEPT\FAHR97-57.DOC ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(UM): 3 Saw 9} 1, Stan Report rlin or Date 2. PIMCO Report 3. Callan Report URRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) e- 3 SEPr9} 1. staHReport Sign re Date D" na ( gal nee v3S7 Ign Ire Date Me t ed y yti Signature bate Assistant General Manager 41Design") ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) On September 7, 1995, the Districts'Treasury Bill investments matured and funds were wired to PIMCO, the Districts' external money manager. The Districts'funds are invested to maximize safety, liquidity, diversification, Flexibility, and yield in compliance with the Districts' adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. SK:Ic c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Re.Mluw Page 2 of 2 H:1W P.DTAIFIN12210%CRANETAHRTAHR.97GSEPTTAHR97S7.DOC n September 10, 1997 STAFF REPORT Consideration of motion to receive and file Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period April 1 through June 30, 1997 Background Section 15.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the Districts' two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies,"and the "Long-Tem1 Operating Monies," are managed by PIMCO, the Districts' external money manager. The ongoing monitoring of the Districts' investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the Districts' independent investment advisor, indicates that the Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. Quarterly performance reports prepared by PIMCO and Callan Associates are attached for your reference. Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a summary of the performance of the Districts' portfolios managed by PIMCO for the period April 1 through June 30, 1997. Portfolio Performance Sunmary Quarter Ended June 30,1991 liquid Ope ng Monies(%) Long-Tenn Operating Monies(%) Total Rate of Retum 3 month I 1 A 2.6 6 mermre 2.7 3.2 9 months 4.1 5.5 Since Inceptbn 30 Sept BS 5.6 .3 Benchmark 3 Month 1.3 2. 6 Month 2.6 2.9 9MOM11 3.9 5.1 Markel Value per PIMC030 June 97 $17.1M $321.3M EeOmeted Current Yield00 June 97 5.54% 6.54% Ownery Deposth,W M Ie) $12.4M Estimated Annual Irrcmne 60.9M 321.OM CSDOC • PO,Boa 3127 0 Fov sin VWIM.CA Nn"127 0 (714)M-2211 FAHR97-57 Page 2 September 10, 1997 Market Recao The second quarter of 1997 saw the surging economic expansion of the first quarter subside to a moderate pace of growth, due to contractions in consumer spending. This moderation decreased the threat of inflation, which eased fears that the Federal Reserve would further tighten the Fed Funds target rate above the 5.5% level which they established in March. At their May meeting, the Fed held the rate constant. Fixed income showed a stronger performance over the first quarter, their positive returns reflecting a mild easing of interest rates. PIMCO continued a below-index duration during the second quarter for the Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio, emphasizing U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, and high-quality corporate sector securities. This contributed to the portfolio performing slightly better than its benchmark again this quarter(2.6% vs. 2.5%). PIMCO continued to maintain a below-index duration for the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, and emphasized high-quality Commercial Paper investments, which contributed to the portfolio slightly outperforming its benchmark (1.4% vs. 1.4%) this quarter. Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the table below. On April 17, 1997, $12.4 million, received through the County Tax Collector's apportionment cycle, was deposited in the Liquid Operating Monies portfolio. Liquid Long-Tenn Operating Monies operating Monies Guenter Ending ISM) ($M) 30 Sept 96 14.2 287A 31 Dec.96 14.4 311.5 31 Mar.97 4.5 313.2 30 June 97 17.1 321.3 Recommendation Receive and file this information-only report. SKIc WeadWata2Wp.dl3Un12210braneWAHR%FAHR.971STAFFRPT.97tsrta59757.doc For Sd.Sec_Us,Only AGENDA ❑ CONIK INFO.ITEM b ❑ COMM.ACTIONITEM ITEM ❑ JT.BOS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT.BDS.DISCUSSION (NON-CONSENT) JyOBU HEAPING T.BOS.MEETING DATE G JT.BD$.AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE COMM,to.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Originator) Poo: Poo FAHR: 09-10-97 FAH All 110, Greg Mathews, 2006 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: 09-24-97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONjSj: Agenda Wordina: FY 96-97 Year End Performance Objective and Workplan Report covering the period ended June 30, 1997. Recommended Action(s): 1. Staff recommends that the Committee review, approve and forward the 1996-97 Year-End Report for the period ended June 30, 1997, to the Joint Boards. CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOAR p ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC Date Notice of Exemption Filed: ITEM: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination glad on Approval of 3rd Quarter Performance Report-5/14/97 CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES ITUW ew0t PW Tmafixu TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: N/A N/A N/A N/A SOURCE: Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION BUDGET TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: N/A N/A N/A $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT N/A N/A N/A $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION7 NOT APPLICABLE If YES,state number: —Permanent _Limded Tenn If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section H:\WP.DTANOMINQ150w1ATHEWSTAHRt091097.AIT Page 1 Of 2 CSDOC 0 P.O. Box 6127 9 Fountain Valley.CA 9272a-8127 • (714)962-2411 -ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(List): 9 1. Third Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the period Olig nator Date ended June 30.1997. CONCURREN ES: Signature Date Division Manager(Or Designee) ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) 1. ThIM Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the pariod Signature Date ended June 30.1997. Departure a (p s� Signs ure ate Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background andlor Summary) Attached, in a separately bound document, is the Districts' End of Year Workplan and Performance Report- FY'96-97. This report covers the period ended June 30, 1997. Contained within this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan milestones identified in the 1996.97 approved budget and workplan document. This report is a summary of operational accomplishments of the Districts'through June 30, 1997. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager H:IWP.DTAWDMIW150WATHEWSIFAHR1091097AIT Page 2 Of 2 AGENDA a Eor atl.Sm use axx ITEM ❑ COMM INEO.ITEMI ❑ COMM.AC ITEM TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT.BOS.CONSENT ❑ Jr.acx; ascussroN MONCONSENT) /❑; P'U/ HEARING MEETING DATE JT.SM.AGENDA REM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.I0.NO, DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMITS: OMITS PDC: PDC 410,Ed Hodges , 3005 FAHR:9/10197 FAHR­q� All EXEC: EXEC DNision No.,Name,and Extension STEER: JT.BDS: STEER AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordina: Security Services-Specification No.P-177 FAHR Committee Recommendation The General Manager award a contract to The Wackenhut Corporation,to provide security services for a one-year period for two 24-hour-aday guards,beginning September 16, 1997,with provisions for four(4)one-year extensions at a cost notto exceed$200,000;and increase the budget allocation from$130,000 to$200,000. Recommended Action(s): The General Manager award a contract to The Wackenhut Corporation,to provide security services at the daily rate of $286.12,for a one-year period beginning September 16, 1997,with provisions for four(4) one-year extensions. The estimated annual cost is$97,936.80. CEQAREVIEW: Projectis Exempt: NOTAPPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on. CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES from audeH pl,u Tun. m TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$130,000.00 $130,000 $23,802 $106,197.76 $106,197.76 SOURCE: CORF Schedule/U.Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule(Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT $200,000 $200.000 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO Rm.,d maxrev Page 1 of 4 OlEADIDATA2IW P.DTATINMI OtCRANEtFAH RIFAHR.971SEPTIFAHR97b3A.DOC CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(Dst) To Comm0lee- 1.Bid Tabulabon Signature Date Division Mal ager(Or Designee) -"` li-2 -9, Signature - Date To Ji.acts.: 1. Depe m 1t a Or � ig ee p / 1T ignature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) The Districts have out sourced the security of the Plants for approximately 6 years. For the last 4 years, the security contract has been given to the Wackenhut Corporation. In July, 1997, staff prepared Specification No. P-177 for security services. The original contract with Wackenhut called for approximately 26,500 hours of service. This included enough time for three (3)full time guards, providing around the clock service. Staff believes that this level of service is no longer needed. As a result, Specification No P-177, decreased the total amount of service from 26,500 hours to 8,760 hours. The new level of service will provide for one full time guard to be located at the Plant 1 guard shack from the hours of 5:30 am to 5:30 pm, Monday thru Friday. During this time the guard will make one complete round of the treatment plants in the morning and one in the afternoon. Additionally, between the hours of 5:30 pm and 5:30 am and all day Saturday and Sunday, the guard service will provide continual rounds of the treatment plants. On August 5, 1997, sealed bids were received from five (5) Security Companies. Two (2) of the five (5) companies submitted "no-bids". Of the remaining three (3) companies, the bids ranged from $268.12 per day to $284.16. The lowest responsive bidder was the Wackenhut Corporation. Budget Information This years CORF budget included $130,000.00 for Security Services. Staff Recommendation The General Manager award a contract to The Wackenhut Corporation,to provide security services at the daily rate of$286.12, for a one-year period beginning September 16, 1997, with provisions for four(4) one-year extensions. The estimated annual cost is$97,936.80. EEH:fw c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Rw mnwr Page 2 of 4 M\WP.DTAIGSAt2410WODGEStFAHRZEP97.FAH August 18, 1997 MEMORANDUM TO: Edwin E. Hodges Director of General Services Administration FROM: Marc D. Dubois Contracts/Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Security Services Specification No. P-177 Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday, August 5, 1997, for providing Security Services, Specification No. P-177, for a one-year period beginning September 16, 1997. The table below details the bid tabulation. COMPANY IUNIT RATE DAILY RATE The Wackenhut Company $11.18 $268.32 American Protective Services, Inc. $11.76 $282.24 Bums International Security Services $11.84 $284.16 Baaden Security Management, Inc. --- No-Bid Shield Security, Inc. No-Bid Staff recommends the award of a contract to The Wackenhut Corporation, the proposer with the lowest cost for providing security services at the daily rate of$268.32,for a one-year period beginning September 16, 1997,with provisions for four(4)one-year extensions. The estimated annual ost is 97,936.80. arc D. Dubois ontracts/Purchasing Manager Edwin E. Hodges Director of G ne rvices Administration ryG. S d irector of nance H:\W P.DTA\FIM2230\BIDSN177SEC.TAB CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 at Fountain Valley.CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 Po a m red.seo O. AGENDA ❑ COMM.WO.REMEM ITEM oCOMM rr.MS.CO�NSEHNTT ' TRANSMITTAL ❑ Jr.eos.dscussxxN (NON-CONSENT) ❑ gJ7.5DS.AGENDAITEMN FJdNNG T.MS,MEETING DATE O. MEETING DATE COMMAD.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Originator) PDC: FOG FAHR:09/10/97 FAHR 210, Steve Kozak,2504 EXEC: EXEC ALL STEER: STEER JT.BDS:0924/97 Division No.,Name,and Extension AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS'INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER FAHR Committee Recommendation 1. Approve the Districts'Investment Policy Statement, including the revisions recommended in this report. 2. Renew the delegation of investment authority to the Districts'Director of Finance/Treasurer for 1997-98. 3. Recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No.97-XX for adoption of the Districts'Investment Policy Statement,and renewal of investment authority for 1997-98. 4. The Districts may enter into short-term (90-day) reverse repurchase agreements upon the recommendation of our external money managers,with a report back to the Committee; and 5.The Districts may not enter into long-term reverse repurchase agreements without approval of the Joint Boards of Directors. Recommended Acfion(s): 1. Review and approve the Districts'Investment Policy Statement,including the revisions recommended in this report. 2. Renew the delegation of investment authority to the Districts'Director of Finance/Treasurer for 1997-98. 3. Recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 97-XX for adoption of the Districts'Investment Policy Statement,and renewal of investment authority for 1997-98. CEOl1 REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on July 30, 1997 Final EIR Approved on-and Notice of Determination filed on_ CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR• YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT T043ATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES R.,eu°aN PI+ Tnnarersl TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$21,958,000 SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS $21,958,000 N/A N/A N/A Schaduelline Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedula ine Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: Revenue producing program $21,958,000 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: RweEMIW Page 1 of 2 11LEADIDATA2IW P.DTAIFIN722101CRANEIFAHRIFAHR.9TSEPTIFAHR97i8C.DOC THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTEDTHIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT sa.00 WILLPROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NOYES REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES IIYES,sletentonwr: _Permanent Limaed Term It YES,ev:Paln In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Us1): I SCPT q} 1. Im m eNnucit Policy Stateent ngin o Date 2. BwM ResolWnn No.97-%I( NCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(Ust) 1. Investment Policy Statement e-- nsePT9} 2. BoeM ResoIWSn No.97-XX Signet r Date D" anager r es' e) a so Signelure Date General Manager ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) In July, the FAHR Committee recommended adoption of Board Resolution No. 97-27, for approval of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement and the delegation of investment authority to the Director of Finance/Treasurer for 1997-98, to the Joint Boards of Directors. After discussion among the Directors at the July 30, 1997 Joint Boards meeting, the annual review of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement and the delegation of investment authority,was referred back to the FAHR Committee for further study and consideration, to be brought back before the Joint Boards in September; and a moratorium was placed on investing in reverse repurchase agreements until the Joint Boards vote to adopt a final policy on reverse repurchase agreements. The attached staff report is presented in response to the issues discussed at the July 30, 1997 Joint Boards meeting. Recommended Action Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee adopt a motion to: 1. Review and approve the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, including the revisions recommended in this report; 2. Renew the delegation of investment authority to the Districts' Director of Finance/Treasurer for 1997-98; and 3. Recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 97-XX for adoption of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, and renewal of investment authority for 1997-98. SK:Ic WeadMa1a2\vipdto\fin IO\cmneTAHRTAHR.97\SEPTVahr97-48cdoc c: Department Head R.05nue7 Page 2 of 2 \IEADVJATA2\W P.DTA\FIN\2210\CRANETAHRTAHR.97\SEPT\FAHR97-0BGDOC Y RESOLUTION NO. 97-XX AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS, AND ADOPTING DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS, AND ADOPTING DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS .. . .. .... ... .. . WHEREAS, on December 8, 1994, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 94-156, appointing the Director of Finance as Treasurer of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California; and, WHEREAS, on September 25, 1996, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 96-79, readopting the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, and establishing specific performance benchmarks and objectives, together with a schedule of frequency of investment performance reports; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53607, the Boards of Directors may delegate authority to invest and/or reinvest Districts' funds to the Treasurer for a one-year period; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53646, the Districts are required to review their Investment Policy annually and readopt their Policy at a public meeting, which Policy will establish specific performance benchmarks and objectives, and specific monitoring and reports. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the authority of the Boards of Directors to invest or reinvest Districts' surplus funds, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, or to deposit for safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with depositories, as provided for in California Government Code Sections 53608 and 53630, is hereby delegated to the Districts' Treasurer for a one-year period commencing on the date this Resolution is adopted, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53607. Section 2: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Investment Policy Statement of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, as set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following speck performance benchmarks for their two investment funds in accordance with Section 14.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy: LIQUID OPERATING MONIES: The Short-Term Operating Fund will be compared to the three month T-Bill rate, and the Callan Active Cash Flow Income Style Group. The Callan Active Cash Flow Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a maximum maturity of one year. LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES: The Long-Term Operating Fund will be compared to the Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate One-to-Five Year Maturity Index and to the Callan Defensive Fixed Income Style Group. Section 4: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt a performance monitoring and reporting schedule, as required by Section 15.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy, which schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit"B" and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED AND ADOPTED at regular meeting held September 24, 1997. K: wp.dtaVt W10\crane\RESOSVahr97-48breso.doc n a f September 10, 1997 n`� STAFF REPORT ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCEITREASURER BACKGROUND On July 9, 1997, the Finance, Administration& Human Resources (FAHR) Committee, in their capacity as the oversight committee for the Districts' investment program, completed their annual review of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement and the delegation of investment authority to the Director of FinancefTreasurer for FY 1997-98. The FAHR Committee recommended adoption of Board Resolution No. 97-27, for approval of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement and the delegation of investment authority to the Director of Finance/Treasurer for FY 1997-98, to the Joint Boards of Directors. After discussion among the Directors at the July 30, 1997 Joint Boards meeting, the annual review of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement and the delegation of investment authority, was referred back to the FAHR Committee for further study and consideration, to be brought back before the Joint Boards in September; and a moratorium was placed on investing in reverse repurchase agreements until the Joint Boards vote to adopt a final policy on reverse repurchase agreements. This report is presented in response to the issues discussed at the July 30, 1997 Joint Boards meeting. The issues include: Reverse Repurchase Agreements, Commercial Paper ratings, collateral for Secured Time Deposits, and collateral pricing. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS Reverse Repurchase Agreements (Reverse Repos) are generally two simultaneous short term financial transactions in which the owner of a security essentially sells that security to a third parry and agrees to buy it back at a fixed price at a specked time in the future. When the transaction is concluded, the security owner has actually used the security as collateral for a loan. At the end of the agreement period, the owner regains possession of the security and the lender is repaid the loan amount plus interest Use of a reverse repurchase agreement would be appropriate to preserve the capital invested in a particular security. This could occur 9 the Districts had a cash requirement that exceeded our short-term investments in rash equivalents. In such a case, we could sell a longer term security and use the proceeds of the sale. If the market conditions had changed since the purchase of the security and the market value was less than the purchase price, a sale would result in a loss of principal. In this case, Section 8.13 of the proposed and existing CSDOC Investment Policy would allow a reverse repurchase agreement. CSCOC 0 P.O.enr9127 6 Fountain VaMy.CA 9272"127 0 (714)9W-2411 v FAHR97-46 Page 2 of 5 September 10, 1997 An investment that would be sold at a loss could still be pledged as security for a short term loan. The Districts' Investment Policy requires that the loan period must match the maturity of the investment. When the loan and the investment both matured, the investment would be redeemed and the proceeds used to satisfy the loan. In this way the market loss on the security would be avoided, the full yield of the investment would be realized, and the cost to the Districts is reduced to the difference between the realized yield and the interest paid on the loan. The Districts' Investment Policy subjects reverse repurchase agreements to several stringent requirements and safeguards: • An agreement is limited to a 90-day tern, • An agreement must mature on the exact date funds are unconditionally available for repayment, • Proceeds of reverse repurchase agreements shall be used solely to provide/supplement portfolio liquidity, • An agreement must be covered by a Master Repurchase Agreement in the forth of the agreement developed by the Public Securities Association, • A long-term agreement must be preauthorized by the Board of Directors, • No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in reverse repurchase agreements, • All agreements must be included in a schedule indicating their maturity and the cash flow for repayment in monthly and quarterly Treasurer's reports. The reverse repurchase agreement authorization is intended to augment overall portfolio yield in a safe and prudent manner and to protect principal. It is not to be used as a tool to plan major market strategies, to speculate on market and interest rate movements or to provide funds for additional investments. The 20% of portfolio value for reverse repurchase agreements is the same maximum provided in Section 53601 of the Government Code, but no agreements have been made during the time that the Directors have delegated investment authority to the Districts' Director of Finance/Treasurer. No change is recommended to the 20% investment constraint for reverse repurchase agreements found in the Government Code. ANNUAL REVIEW OF INVESTMENT POLICY Section 53646 of the California Government Code (the"Code") requires local government agencies to review their investment policy annually, and readopt their policy at a public meeting. Likewise, the Districts' Investment Policy Statement includes the requirement that the Districts shall review its Investment Policy annually (Sections 1.2 and 16.1). The following discussion presents a review of selected sections of the Districts' Investment Policy in response to topics discussed by the Joint Boards. y FAHR97-48 Page 3 of 5 September 10, 1997 Commercial Paper Commercial Paper(CP) is a short-term, unsecured, negotiable promissory note issued by business, and usually backed by a line of credit with a bank. Maximum maturities do not exceed 270 days. Board discussion about Section 8.3, Commercial Paper, of the Districts' Investment Policy centered on the rating requirement specified in Section 8.3. Currently, a credit rating of"P1" from Moody's or"Al"from S&P is required for the Districts' money manager to purchase CP. The concern expressed was that the"or potentially could allow the purchase of split-rated CP, which could add a higher degree of risk to the portfolio. The following revised Section 8.3 is recommended for approval to specifically address this concern: Commercial paper of"prime" quality and rated "P1" by Moody's Investor Services (Moody's), and rated "Al" by Standard & Poors Corporation (S&P), and issued by a domestic corporation organized and operating in the United States with assets in excess of$500 million and having a rating of"A"or better on its long-tern debt as provided by Moody's or S&P. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 180 days to maturity from the date of purchase. Purchases of commercial paper shall not exceed 15% of the market value of the portfolio, except that a maximum of 30% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper, so long as the average maturity of all commercial paper in the portfolio does not exceed 31 days. No more than 5% of the market value of the portfolio, or 10%of the issuers outstanding paper, may be invested in commercial paper issued by any one eligible corporation. Secured (Collateralized) Time Deposits Secured time deposits are deposits in banks which are collateralized by acceptable securities. Discussion at the July Board meeting about Section 8.7.1, Secured (Collateralized)Time Deposits, focused on the need to clearly define acceptable collateral in this Section. The following revised Section 8.7.1 is recommended for approval to specifically address this concern: Secured (collateralized)time deposits issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank or state or federal savings and loan association, as defined by Section 5102 of the California Financial Code, and having a net operating profit in the two(2) most recently completed fiscal years. Collateral must comply with Chapter 4, Bank Deposit Law, Section 16500 et seq., and Chapter 4.5, Savings and Loan Association and Credit Union Deposit Law, Section 16600 et seq., of the California Government Code. Thus, collateral will be maintained at a level of at least 110% of deposits. To ensure internal consistency with the adoption of the above revisions, staff also recommends approval of the following revised Section 8.7.2 of the Districts' Investment Policy: FAHR9748 Page 4 of 5 September 10, 1997 Negotiable certificates of deposit issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank or state or federal savings and loan association, as defined by Section 5102 of the California Financial Code; and which shall have a rating of"A"or better on its long-term debt as provided by Moody's or S&P; or which shall have the following minimum short- term ratings by at least two (2) rating services: "P1"for deposits by Moodys, "Al"for deposits by S&P, or comparably rated by a nationally recognized rating agency which rates such securffies; or as otherwise approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors. Banker's Acceptances While not the subject of Board discussion on July 30, 1997, staff recommends the following revision to further clarify Investment Policy safeguards in compliance with the Government Code: Add the following as item (d) to Section 8.4: . . . and (d) no more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in the banker's acceptances of any one (1)commercial bank. Collateralization Board discussion about collateralization centered on defining "how to price collateral; and "how often to reprice collateral for repurchase agreements." Section 9 of the Investment Policy, entitled"Collateralization," states that collateralization will be required for secured time deposits and for Repurchase Agreements. Speck collateralization requirements for these investments are then more fully described in spec subsections of Section 8,Authorized and Suitable Investments, of the Investment Policy. For example, the collateral requirements for secured time deposits are described in Section 8.7.1, discussed above. The following revised Section 8.12.1 is recommended for approval to specfically address the matter of pricing and repricing of collateral for repurchase agreements: All repurchase agreements shall be collateralized with securities eligible for purchase under this Policy. In order to anticipate market changes and to provide a level of security for all repurchase agreement transactions, collateralization shall be maintained at a level of at least 102% of market value of the principal and accrued interest, and shall be adjusted no less than weekly. Additionally, staff recommends the following revision to the beginning of Section 9, to more clearly state the general collateral requirements of the Districts' Investment Policy: FAHR9748 Page 5 of 5 September 10, 1997 Generally, the value to secure deposits under this Policy shall comply with Section 53652 of the California Government Code. ANNUAL DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY Effective January 1, 1997, SS 109 introduced a new compliance requirement for local government investment programs. Section 53607 of the Code now stales that governing boards of local agencies may only delegate authority to invest and/or reinvest agency funds to the agency's Treasurer for a one-year period. Prior to enactment of SB 109, the Code did not contain a time limitation on the delegation of investment authority for local agencies. As such, on December 8, 1994, the Districts' Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 94-156, appointing the Director of Finance as the Districts' Treasurer, and delegating investment authority to the Director of Finance/Treasurer. That action remains in effect. With adoption of attached Resolution No. 97-XX, the Joint Boards would renew its delegation of investment authority to the Director of Finance/Treasurer for a one-year period in compliance with the requirements of SB 109. In the future, the Joint Boards will consider similar actions along with the annual reconsideration of the Districts' Investment Policy. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee adopt a motion to: 1. Review and approve the District's Investment Policy Statement, including the revisions recommended in this report; 2. Renew the delegation of investment authority to the Districts' Director of Financerl-reasurer for 1997-98; and 3. Recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 97-XX for adoption of the District's Investment Policy Statement, and renewal of investment authority for 1997-98. SK:lc HWip.dalrmM1O' neWAHRTAHR9T%STAFFRPT 97lsrtehW7 = a .ra s ¢u c� 59 9 [7 0 p COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT Reviewed and Approved by Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee on September 10, 1997 Adopted by Joint Boards of Directors on September 24, 1997 (Resolution No. 97-XX) oa MUNICIPAL TREASURERS'ASSOCIATION xxrt I. s+ .Trs s C <x.o< December 10. 1996 Gary G.-Streed Director of Finance/'Measurer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Mr. Streed: The Municipal 7Yeasurers'Association is pleased to present the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California with the Association's Investment Policy Certification. Members of the Association's Investment Policy Certification Committee congratulate the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California for its success in developing a comprehensive written investment policy which meets the criteria set forth by the Association's Investment Policy Certification Program. Our review of your investment policy is limited to the documentation submitted. The Certification is not a guarantee against loss due to economic and market conditions or human behavior. The Association's Investment Policy Certification Committee Chairman, Rod Rich. will be presenting the Investment Policy Certification plaque to all recipients at the Association's 1997 Annual Conference in Sacramento. California. The County Sanitation Districts will be recognized during the Awards Luncheon on Wednesday, August 20. We hope that you will be able to attend this luncheon. however, if your schedule does not permit you to attend, please call me at (202) 833-1017. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. California is to be commended for enhancing its fiscal responsibility in the management of fiscal funds. Sincerely. Executive hector 1229 Nineteenth Street,N.W.Washington,DC 20036 PHONE 202.833-1017 FAX 202-833-0375 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Topic Pane 1.0 Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3.0 Standard of Prudence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4.0 Investment Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5.0 Delegation of Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions . . . . . . . . . 4 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 9.0 Collateralization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 10.0 Safekeeping and Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 11.0 Diversification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 12.0 Maximum Maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 13.0 Internal Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 14.0 Performance Objectives and Benchmarks . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 15.0 Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 16.0 Investment Policy Adoption and Revision . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Anpendix A. Summary of Investment Authorization B. Board Resolution No. 97-XX, Authorizing the Districts' Treasurer to Invest and/or Reinvest Districts' Funds, and Adopting Investment Policy and Performance Benchmarks C. Sections of the California Government Code Pertinent to Investing Public Funds D. Glossary of Investment Terms COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT 1.0 policy: It is the policy of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) to invest public funds in a manner which ensures the safety and preservation of capital while meeting reasonably anticipated operating expenditure needs, achieving a reasonable rate of return and conforming to all stale and local statutes governing the investment of public funds. 1.1. This Investment Policy is set forth by CSDOC for the following purposes: 1.1.1. To establish a clear understanding for the Boards of Directors, CSDOC management, responsible employees and third parties of the objectives, policies and guidelines for the investment of the CSDOC's idle and surplus funds. 1.1.2. To offer guidance to investment staff and any external investment advisors on the investment of CSDOC funds (see Appendix "A"). 1.1.3. To establish a basis for evaluating investment results. 1.2. CSDOC establishes investment policies which meet its current investment goals. CSDOC shall review this policy annually, and may change its policies as its investment objectives change. 2.0 Scope: This Investment Policy applies to all financial assets of CSDOC, except for the funds of the Deferred Compensation Plan, which are managed externally; proceeds of CSDOC's capital projects financing program, which are invested in accordance with provisions of their specific bond indentures; and such funds excluded by law or other Board-approved covenant or agreement. These funds are accounted for by CSDOC as represented in CSDOC's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and include: General Fund Special Reserve Funds Debt Service Funds (unless prohibited by bond indentures) Capital Project Funds Enterprise Funds Internal Service Funds Trust and Agency Funds Any new Fund established by the Boards of Directors, unless exempted by the Board Page 1 of 13 3.0 Standard of Prudence: 3.1 The standard of prudence to be used by CSDOC internal staff shall be the "prudent investor"standard defined below in Section 3.1.1, and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. Investment staff acting in accordance with written procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. 3.1.1 The Prudent Investor Standard: Investments shall be made with judgment and care—under circumstances then prevailing— which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. 4.0 Investment Objectives: The primary objectives, in priority order, of CSDOC's investment activities shall be: 4.1 Safety: The safety and preservation of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program of CSDOC. Investments shall be selected in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in CSDOC's overall portfolio. This will be accomplished through a program of diversification, more fully described in Section 11.0, and maturity limitations, more fully described in Section 12.0, in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed the income generated from the remainder of the portfolio. 4.2 Liquidity: The investment program will be administered in a manner that will ensure that sufficient funds are available for CSDOC to meet its reasonably anticipated operating expenditure needs. 4.3 Return on Investments: The CSDOC investment portfolio will be structured and managed with the objective of achieving a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with legal, safety, and liquidity considerations. Page 2 of 13 5.0 Delegation of Authority: 5.1 Authority to manage CSDOC's investment program is derived from the California Government Code Sections 53600 at seq. and Sections 53635 at seq. The Boards of Directors hereby delegates management responsibility for the CSDOC investment program to it's Director of Finance/Treasurer, who shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program, consistent with this Policy. The Financial Manager/Assistant Treasurer shall be responsible for day-to-day administration, monitoring, and the development of written administrative procedures for the operation of the investment program, consistent with this Policy. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this Policy and the procedures established by the Treasurer. The Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken by CSDOC internal staff, and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of internal staff and external investment advisors engaged in accordance with Section 5.3. 5.2 The administrative procedures for the operation of CSDOC's investment program will provide for, but not be limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Formats for monthly and quarterly reports to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, and the Boards of Directors. 5.2.2 Compliance with generally accepted accounting principles of the Government Accounting Standards Board. 5.2.3 Establishment of benchmarks for performance measurement. 5.2.4 Establishment of a system of written internal controls. 5.2.5 Establishment of written procedures for competitive bids and offerings of securities that may be purchased or sold by internal CSDOC staff. 5.2.6 Establishment of a Desk Procedures Manual for treasury operations and management. 5.3 The Boards of Directors of CSDOC may, in its discretion, engage the services of one or more registered investment advisors to assist in the management of CSDOC's investment portfolio in a manner consistent with CSDOC's objectives. Such external investment advisors, which shall be selected through a competitive process, shall be granted discretion to purchase and sell investment securities in accordance with this Investment Policy. Such advisors must be registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or be exempt from such registration. Page 3 of 13 6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest: 6.1 Officers and employees of CSDOC involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activities that could conflict with proper execution of CSDOC's investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials shall disclose to the General Manager any material financial interests in financial institutions that conduct business within CSDOC's boundaries, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions, the performance of which could be related to the performance of positions in CSDOC's portfolio. 7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions: 7.1 For investment transactions conducted by CSDOC internal staff, the Treasurer will maintain a list of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services to CSDOC, including 'primary" or regional dealers that qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15C3-1 (uniform net capital rule), and Federal or State of California chartered banks. No public deposit shall be made except in a qualified public depository as established by State law. All financial institutions which desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions with CSDOC must supply the following for evaluation by the Treasurer: 7.1.1. Audited financial statements for the institution's three (3) most recent fiscal years. 7.1.2. A statement, in the formal prescribed by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), certifying that the institution has reviewed CSDOC's Investment Policy and that all securities offered to the Districts shall comply fully and in every instance with all provisions of the California Government Code and with this Investment Policy. 7.1.3. A statement describing the regulatory status of the dealer, and the background and expertise of the dealer's representatives. Selection of financial institutions, broker/dealers, and banks authorized to engage in transactions with CSDOC shall be made through a competitive process. An annual review of the financial condition of qualified institutions will be conducted by the Treasurer. Page 4 of 13 7.2 Selection of broker/dealers used by external investment advisors retained by CSDOC, shall be in compliance with contract provisions between CSDOC and any external investment advisors, and shall be in substantially the following form: Use of Securities Brokers: Neither the Investment Advisor nor any parent, subsidiary or related firm shall act as a securities broker with respect to any purchases or sales of securities which may be made on behalf of CSDOC, provided that this limitation shall not prevent the Investment Advisor from utilizing the services of a securities broker which is a parent, subsidiary or related firm, provided such broker effects transactions on a "cost only' or "nonprofit" basis to itself and provides competitive execution. The Investment Advisor shall provide the Districts with a list of suitable independent brokerage firms (including names and addresses) meeting the requirements of Government Code Section 53601.5, and, unless otherwise directed by CSDOC, the Investment Advisor may utilize the service of any of such independent securities brokerage firms it deems appropriate to the extent that such firms are competitive with respect to price of services and execution. 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments: All investments shall be made in accordance with the California Government Code including Sections 16429.1 of seq., 53600 at seq., and 53684, and as described within this Investment Policy. Permitted investments under this Policy shall include: 8.1 Securities issued by the US Government or an agency of the US Government and fully guaranteed as to payment by the US Government or agency of the US Government. Investment in mortgage-backed bonds and CMOs is not governed by this Section 8.1, even if such bonds are issued by agencies of the US Government. See Section 8.2 for conditions of purchase of mortgage-backed securities. See Section 8.11 for conditions of purchase of CMOs. 8.2 Mortgage-backed securities issued by an agency of the US Government, which are backed by pools of mortgages guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, or an agency thereof. Selection of mortgage derivatives, which include interest-only payments (10s) and principal-only payments (POs); inverse floaters, and RE-REMICs (Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits), is hereby prohibited. 8.3 Commercial paper of "prime" quality and rated "PV by Moody's Investor Services (Moody's), 2ad rated "Al" by Standard & Poor's Corporation (S&P), and issued by a domestic corporation organized and operating in the United States with assets in excess of$500 million and having a rating of"A" or better on its long-term debt as provided by Moody's or S&P. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 180 days to maturity from the Page 5 of 13 date of purchase. Purchases of commercial paper shall not exceed 15% of the market value of the portfolio, except that a maximum of 30% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper, so long as the average maturity of all commercial paper in the portfolio does not exceed 31 days. No more than 5% of the market value of the portfolio, or 10% of the issuers outstanding paper, may be invested in commercial paper issued by any one (1) eligible corporation. 8.4 Banker's acceptances issued by institutions, the short-term obligations of which are rated a minimum of "P1" by Moody's, or "Al" by S&P provided that: (a) the acceptance is eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; (b) the maturity does not exceed 270 days; (c) no more than 40% of the total portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances; and (d) no more than 30% of the total portfolio may be invested in the bankers acceptances of any one (1) commercial bank. 8.5 Medium term (or corporate) notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any stale and operating within the United States, the long-term obligations of which are rated at least "A3" by Moody's, or"A-" by S&P. No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in eligible medium term or corporate notes. 8.6 Shares of mutual funds investing in securities permitted under this policy and under California Government Code Section 53601. Such funds must either: (1) attain the highest ranking, or the highest letter and numerical rating, provided by not less than two of the three largest nationally recognized rating services; or(2) have an investment Advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five (5) years of experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized under this Policy and under California Government Code Section 53601, and with assets under management in excess of$500 million. The purchase price of such shares may not include any commissions. Investment in mutual funds may not exceed 15% of the total portfolio. 8.7 Certificates of deposit: 8.7.1 Secured (collateralized)time deposits issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank or state or federal savings and loan association, as defined by Section 5102 of the California Financial Code, BLZU having a net operating profit in the two (2) most recently completed fiscal years. Collateral must comply with Chapter 4, Bank Deposit Law, Section 16500 at seq., and Chapter 4.5, Savings and Loan Association and Credit Union Deposit Law, Section 16600 at seq., of the California Government Code. 8.7.2 Negotiable certificates of deposit (NCDs) issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank or state of federal savings and loan Page 6 of 13 association, as defined by Section 5102 of the California Financial Code; Wd which shall have a rating of "A" or better on its long-term debt as provided by Moody's or S&P; or which shall have the following minimum short-term ratings by at least two (2) rating services: "P1" for deposits by Moody's, "At" for deposits by S&P, or comparably rated by a nationally recognized rating agency which rates such securities, or as otherwise approved by the districts' Boards of Directors. 8.8 Taxable or tax-exempt municipal bonds issued by the State of California or its subdivisions. Such securities must be rated"A3"or higher by Moody's, or"A-" or higher by S&P; or as otherwise approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors. 8.9 The State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). 8.10 The Orange County Investment Pool. 8.11 Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) issued by agencies of the US Government which are backed by pools of mortgages guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, or an agency thereof, and asset- backed securities rated "Aaa" by Moody's and "AAA" by S&P. Selection of mortgage derivatives, which include interest-only payments (IOs) and principal-only payments (POs); inverse floaters, and RE-REMICS (Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits), is hereby prohibited. Securities eligible for purchase under this Section 8.11 shall be issued by an issuer having a rating on its unsecured long-term debt of"A" or higher. Combined purchases of mortgage-backed securities, CMOs and asset-backed securities as authorized under this Section 8.11, may not exceed 20% of the total Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio. 8.12 Repurchase agreements provided that: 8.12.1 All repurchase agreements shall be collateralized with securities eligible for purchase under this Policy, and are maintained at a level of at least 102% of the market value of the repurchase agreements. Collateral securities shall be delivered to a third-party safekeeping agent or to CSDOC's custodian bank. 8.12.2 All repurchase agreements shall be collateralized with securities eligible for purchase under this Policy. In order to anticipate market changes and to provide a level of security for all repurchase agreement transactions, collateralization shall be maintained at a level of at least 102% of market value of the principal and accrued interest, and shall be adjusted no less than weekly. 8.13 Reverse repurchase agreements provided that: Page 7 of 13 8.13.1 Generally, no more than 20% of CSDOC's portfolio shall be invested in reverse repurchase agreements, and there shall be no long-term reverse repurchase agreements unless otherwise authorized by the Districts' Boards of Directors. 8.13.2 The maximum maturity of reverse repurchase agreements shall be ninety (90) days. 8.13.3 Reverse repurchase agreements shall mature on the exact date of a known cash flow which will be unconditionally available to repay the maturing reverse repurchase. 8.13.4 Proceeds of reverse repurchase agreements shall be used solely to supplement portfolio income or to provide portfolio liquidity, and shall not be used to speculate on market movements. 8.13.5 All reverse repurchase agreements must be the subject of a Master Repurchase Agreement between CSDOC and the provider of the reverse repurchase agreement. The Master Repurchase Agreement shall be substantially in the form developed by the Public Securities Association. 8.14 Sales of CSDOC-owned securities in the secondary market may incur losses in order to improve the risk or return characteristics of the portfolio, to prevent anticipated further erosion of principal, or when trading for securities that result in an expected net economic gain to CSDOC. 8.15 If securities owned by the CSDOC are downgraded by either Moody's or S&P to a level below the quality required by this Investment Policy, it shall be CSDOC's policy to review the credit situation and make a determination as to whether to sell or retain such securities in the portfolio. If a decision is made to retain the downgraded securities in the portfolio, their presence in the portfolio will be monitored and reported monthly to the CSDOC General Manager, the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and Boards of Directors. 9.0 Collateralization: Generally, the value to secure deposits under this Policy shall comply with Section 53652 of the California Government Code. Collateralization will be required for secured time deposits, as more fully described in Section 8.7.1; and repurchase agreements, as more fully described in Section 8.12.1. Collateral will always be held by an independent third- party, as more fully described in Section 10.1. The right of collateral substitution is granted. Page 8 of 13 10.0 Safekeeping and Custody: 10.1 All securities transactions, including collateral for repurchase agreements, entered into by, or on behalf of CSDOC, shall be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment(DVP) basis. Securities will be held by CSDOC's third-party custodian bank, which shall be selected through a competitive process, or that agent's representative, or in the agent's account at the Federal Reserve Bank, and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. 11.0 Diversification: CSDOC will diversify its investments by security type, issuer, and financial institution in accordance with the following: 11.1 There is no limit on investment in securities issued by or guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. 11.2 No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in securities of a single agency of the U.S. government, which does not provide the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. 11.3 No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. government or its agencies. 11.4 No individual holding shall constitute more than 5% of the total debt outstanding of any issuer. 11.5 No more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances. 11.6 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper, except that 30% of the portfolio may be so invested so long as the average maturity of all commercial paper in the portfolio does not exceed 31 days. 11.7 No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in medium-term (corporate) notes. 11.8 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in mutual funds. 11.9 No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in negotiable certificates of deposit. 11.10 No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in eligible municipal bonds. Page 9 of 13 11.11 No more than 20% of the Long Term Operating Monies portfolio may be invested in a combination of mortgage-backed securities, CMOs and asset- backed securities. Mortgage-backed securities, CMOs and asset-backed securities may only be purchased by the Districts' external money managers with prior Board approval, and may not be purchased by the Districts' staff. 11.12 No more than the lesser of 15% of the portfolio or the statutory maximum may be invested in LAIF. 11.13 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in the Orange County Investment Pool. 11.14 No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in repurchase agreements. 12.0 Maximum Maturities: To the extent possible, CSDOC will attempt to match its investments with reasonably anticipated cash flow requirements. The Treasurer shall develop a five-year cash flow forecast, which shall be updated quarterly. Based on this forecast, the Treasurer shall designate, from time-to-time, the amounts to be allocated to the investment portfolio. CSDOC monies invested in accordance with this Policy are divided into two (2) categories: 12.1 Liquid Operating Monies. Funds needed for current operating and capital expenditures are known as Liquid Operating Monies. 12.1.1 The maximum final stated maturity of individual securities in the Liquid Operating Monies account portfolio shall be one (1) year from the date of purchase. 12.1.2 The average duration of the Liquid Operating Monies account portfolio shall be recommended by the Treasurer based on the Districts' cash flow requirements, but may never exceed 180 days, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, and shall be updated as needed. 12.2 Long Tenn Operating Monies. Funds needed for longer tens purposes are known as the Long Term Operating Monies. 12.2.1 The maximum final stated maturity of individual securities in the Long Tenn Operating Monies account portfolio shall be five (5) years from the date of purchase, unless otherwise authorized by the Districts' Boards of Directors. Page 10 of 12 12.2.2 The duration of the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall be recommended by the Treasurer based on the Districts' five- year cash flow forecast, shall be reviewed and approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Services Committee, and shall be updated as needed. 12.2.3 The duration of the Long Tenn Operating Monies account portfolio shall never exceed 120% of the duration as established in accordance with Section 12.2.2. 12.2.4 The duration of the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall never be less than 80% of the duration as established in accordance with Section 12.2.2 13.0 Internal Controls: 13.1 The Treasurer shall establish an annual process of independent review by an external auditor. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures. 14.0 Performance Objectives and Benchmarks: 14.1 Overall objective. The investment portfolio of CSDOC shall be designed with the overall objective of obtaining a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with investment risk constraints and reasonably anticipated cash flow needs. 14.2 The Liquid Operating Monies. The investment performance objective for the Liquid Operating Monies shall be to earn a total rate of return over a market cycle which exceeds the return on a market index approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, and by the Districts' Boards of Directors, when the duration of the portfolio is established. This market index is more fully described in Board Resolution No. 97-XX(see Appendix"B"). 14.3 The Long Term Operating Monies. The investment performance objective for the Long Term Operating Monies shall be to earn a total rate of return over a market cycle which exceeds the return on a market index selected by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors, when the duration of the portfolio is established. This market index is more fully described in Board Resolution No. 96-XX (See Appendix"B"). Page 11 of 12 15.0 Reporting: 15.1 Monthly and quarterly investment reports shall be submitted by the Treasurer to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee which shall forward the reports to the Districts' Boards of Directors. The monthly reports shall be submitted to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee within 30 days of the end of the month. These reports shall disclose, at a minimum, the following information about the risk characteristics of CSDOC's portfolio: 15.1.1 Cost and accurate and complete market value of the portfolio. 15.1.2 Modified duration of the portfolio compared to Benchmark. 15.1.3 Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a one-percent (1%) change in interest rates. 15.1.4 Percent of portfolio invested in reverse repurchase agreements, and a schedule which matches the maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay them at maturity. 15.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only, the percent of portfolio maturing within 90 days. 15.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality. 15.1.7 Percent of portfolio with credit ratings below "A" by any rating agency, and a description of such securities. 15.1.8 State that all investments are in compliance with this policy and the California Government Code, or provide a listing of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with this policy or with the California Government Code. 15.1.9 Time-weighted total rate of return for the portfolio for the prior three months, twelve months, year to date, and since inception compared to the Benchmark returns for the same periods. 15.1.10 State that sufficient funds are available for CSDOC to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months, or if not, state the reasons for the shortfall. Page 12 of 13 1&2 CSDOC's Treasurer shall meet quarterly with the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee to review investment performance, proposed strategies and compliance with this investment policy. External investment advisors may be required to attend said meetings at the discretion of the Chairman of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. 16.0 Investment Policy Adoption and Revision: 16.1 The Investment Policy of CSDOC shall be reviewed by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and shall be adopted by resolution of the Boards of Directors of CSDOC. The Policy shall be reviewed on an annual basis by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, which shall recommend revisions, as appropriate, to the Boards of Directors. Any modifications made thereto shall be approved by the Boards of Directors. 16.2 The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee shall serve as the oversight committee for the Districts' Investment program and shall adopt guidelines for the ongoing review of duration, quality and liquidity of the Districts' portfolio. Page 13 of 13 APPENDIX "A" APPENDIX "A" SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT AUTHORIZATION INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL MANAGERS SHORT TERM OPERATING FUND INVESTMENT INTERNAL EXTERNAL U.S. Treasuries OK OK Federal Agencies Fixed coupon, fixed mat. OK Mortgage-backed NO NO Commercial paper OK OK Banker's Accept. OK OK Medium Term Notes Fixed coupon, fixed mat.* OK Mutual Funds Money Market Only** Money Market Only Negotiable CDs Fixed coupon, fixed mat.* OK Municipal Bonds OK* NO LAIF OK NO OCIP OK NO CMOs NO NO Asset-backed NO NO Repurchase Agree. OK OK Reverse Re os OK* OK LONG TERM OPERATING PORTFOLIO INVESTMENT INTERNAL EXTERNAL U.S. Treasuries OK OK Federal Agencies Fixed coupon, fixed mat. OK Mortgage-backed NO OK Mutual Funds Money Market Only** OK Negotiable CDs Fixed coupon, fixed mat.* OK Municipal Bonds OK* OK LAIF OK NO OCIP OK NO CMOs NO With Board Approval Asset-backed NO With Board Approval Repurchase Agree. OK OK Reverse Re os OK* OK Mlah prior approval of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee. **Using financial institutions approved by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee. H:\ m�I=RANRNVE PLY 71MV WKY APPENDIX IT RESOLUTION NO. 97- AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER TO INVEST ANDIOR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS, AND ADOPTING DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER TO INVEST ANDIOR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS,AND ADOPTING DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS .. . . .. . .. ... .. . WHEREAS, on December 8, 1994, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 94-156, appointing the Director of Finance as Treasurer of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California; and, WHEREAS, on September 25, 1996, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 96-79, readopting the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, and establishing specific performance benchmarks and objectives, together with a schedule of frequency of investment performance reports; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53607, the Boards of Directors may delegate authority to invest and/or reinvest Districts'funds to the Treasurer for a one-year period; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53646, the Districts are required to review their Investment Policy annually and readopt their Policy at a public meeting, which Policy will establish specific performance benchmarks and objectives, and specific monitoring and reports. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the authority of the Boards of Directors to invest or reinvest Districts' surplus funds, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, or to deposit for safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with depositories, as provided for in California Government Code Sections 53608 and 53630, is hereby delegated to the Districts' Treasurer for a one-year period commencing on the date this Resolution is adopted, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53607. Section 2: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Investment Policy Statement of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, as set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following specific performance benchmarks for their two investment funds in accordance with Section 14.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy: LIQUID OPERATING MONIES: The Short-Tenn Operating Fund will be compared to the three month T-Bill rate, and the Callan Active Cash Flow Income Style Group. The Callan Active Cash Flow Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a maximum maturity of one year. LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES: The Lang-Tern Operating Fund will be compared to the Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate One-to-Five Year Maturity Index and to the Callan Defensive Fixed Income Style Group. Section 4: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt a performance monitoring and reporting schedule, as required by Section 15.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy, which schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit "B," and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED AND ADOPTED at regular meeting held , 1997. H:\wp.dtatadminlBS\RESW7-27.DOC EXHIBIT "B" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING FOR THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT PROGRAM POLICY REFERENCE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC REPORTING PARTY• PIMCO MELLON CALLAN 15.1.1 Cost and market value of the portfolio (monthly mark-to-market). M,Q M,Q Q 15.1.2 Modified duration of the portfolio compared to benchmark. M,Q Q 15A.3 Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a 1% change in interest rate. M,Q Q 15.1.4 Percent of portfolio Invested in reverse repurchase agreements,and a schedule which matches the maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay them at maturity. M,Q 15.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only,the percent of portfolio maturing within 90 days. M,Q Q 15.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality. M,Q Q 15.1.7 Percent of portfolio with credit ratings below"A"by any rating agency, and a description of such securities. M,O Q 15.1.8 Listing of any transactions or holdings which do not complywith this policy or with the California Government Code. M,Q 15.1.9 Time-weighted total rate ofretum for the portfolio for the prior three months,twelve months,year-to- date,and since Inception compared to the benchmark returns for the same periods. M. Q Q ADDL" Comparison of portfolio performance to market index benchmark. M,Q Q ADDL" Comparison of Manager's performance to peergroup benchmark. Q ADDL" Monitoring of organizational and structural changes of investment management firm. Q ADDL•' Audit portfolios for compliance with investment policy guidelines. Q 15.1.10 CSDOC will report if sufficient funds are available for rl to meet operating expenditure requirements for the next six months,or if not,state the reasons for the shortfall. Notes 'M=Monthly Q=Quarterly "ADDL=Monitoring of Additional Performance Characteristics eowP.DTAviwnrD¢Reewevssr.PwwowroRZW APPENDIX "C° Sections of the California Government Code Pertinent to Investing Public Funds Introduction A requirement of Section 8,Authorized and Suitable Investments,of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, is that all investments shall be made in accordance with the California Government Code,including Sections 16429.1 et seq.,53600 et seq.,and 53684. This appendix presents a copy of these sections for the reader's reference. (Please Note: Copies of the latest Government Code sections referenced above are being obtained and will be included in a spiral bound version of the Districts' Investment Policy which will be published following final Board action on this item.) APPENDIX "Dfe APPENDIX "D" GLOSSARY OF INVESTMENT TERMS Agencies. Shorthand market terminology for any obligation issued by a government- sponsored entity (GSE), or a federally related institution. Obligations of GSEs are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government. There are eight GSEs, five of which are currently active in the new issue market. The five include: FFCB. The Federal Farm Credit Bank System provides credit and liquidity in the agricultural industry. FFCB issues discount notes and bonds. FHLB. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLB issues discount notes and bonds. FHLMC. Like FHLB, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation provides credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLMC, also called "FreddieMac' issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage pass-through securities. FNMA. Like FHLB and FreddieMac, the Federal National Mortgage Association was established to provide credit and liquidity in the housing market. FNMA, also known as "FannieMae," issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage pass- through securities. SLMA. The student loan marketing association, also known as "SallieMae," provides liquidity to private lenders who make various types of loans for education. SLMA currently issues floating rate notes. Federally related institutions are arms of the federal government. Most do not issue securities directly into the market. Those which do issue directly include the following: GNMA. The Government National Mortgage Association, known as "GinnieMae," issues mortgage pass-through securities which are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US Government. PEFCO. The Private Export Funding corporation assists exporters. Obligations of PEFCO are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government. TVA. The Tennessee Valley Authority provides flood control and power and promotes development in portions of the Tennessee, Ohio and Mississippi River valleys. TVA currently issues discount notes and bonds. Page 1 of 7 Amortized Cost. Measure of the cost of a security whereby the cost value will change over time as the discount or premium paid for the security is gradually incorporated into the principal value as interest payments are received. Asked. The price at which a seller offers to sell a security. Asset-backed securities. Securities collateralized with consumer receivables, such as automobile loans, credit card receivables, or home equity loans, which are owned by the issuer, but placed with a trustee for the benefit of the investor. Average life. In mortgage-related investments, including CMOs, the average time to expected receipt of principal payments, weighted by the amount of principal expected. Banker's acceptance. A money market instrument created to facilitate international trade transactions. It is highly liquid and safe because the risk of the trade transaction is transferred to the bank which "accepts" the obligation to pay the investor. Benchmark. A comparison security or portfolio. A performance benchmark is a partial market index which reflects the mix of securities allowed under a specific investment policy. Bid. The price at which a buyer offers to buy a security. Broker. A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a transaction for which the broker receives a commission. A broker does not sell securities from his own position. Bullet structure. A portfolio strategy in which a manager overweights both the short and long end of the yield curve, and undenveights the middle part of the curve. Certificate of Deposit(CD). A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large denomination CDs may be marketable. Collateral. Securities or cash pledged by a borrower to secure repayment of a loan or repurchase agreement. Also, securities pledged by a financial institution to secure deposits of public moneys. Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMO). Classes of bonds which redistribute the cash flows of mortgage securities (and whole loans) to create securities which have different levels of prepayment risk, as compared to the underlying mortgage securities. Commercial paper. The short-term unsecured debt of corporations. Page 2 of 7 Conditional prepayment rate (CPR). A measure of mortgage prepayment activity. It assumes that a constant fraction of the principal prepays each month and is based on the previous month's remaining balance. The rate is expressed as an annualized percentage. For instance, a CPR of 6% indicates that each month 6% of the remaining principal balance prepays on an annualized basis. Convexity. The rate of change in a bond's price as duration changes. It is a particularly important component of price change for longer term bonds, or for large changes in interest rates. Cost Yield. The annual income from an investment divided by the purchase cost. Because it does not give effect to premiums and discounts which may have been included in the purchase cost, it is an incomplete measure of return. Coupon. The rate at which a bond pays interest. Credit risk. The risk that principal and/or interest on an investment will not be paid in a timely manner due to changes in the condition of the issuer. Current yield. The annual income from an investment divided by the current market value. Since the mathematical calculation relies on the current market value rather than the investor's cost, current yield is unrelated to the actual return the investor will earn if the security is held to maturity. Dealer. A dealer acts as a principal in security transactions, selling securities from and buying securities for his own position. Debenture. A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. Derivative. Any security that has principal and/or interest payments which are subject to uncertainty (but not for reasons of default or credit risk) as to timing and/or amount, or any security which represents a component of another security which has been separated from other components ("Stripped" coupons and principal). A derivative is also defined as a financial instrument the value of which is totally or partially derived from the value of another instrument, interest rate or index. Discount. The difference between the par value of a bond and the cost of the bond, when the cost is below par. Some short-tens securities, such as Tbills and banker's acceptances, are known as discount securities. They sell at a discount from par, and return the par value to the investor at maturity without additional interest. Other securities, which have fixed coupons trade at a discount when the coupon rate is lower than the current market rate for securities of that maturity and/or quality. Page 3 of 7 Diversification. Dividing investment funds among a variety of investments to avoid excessive exposure to any one source of risk. Duration. The weighted average time to maturity of a bond where the weights are the present values of the future cash flows. Duration measures the price sensitivity of a bond to changes in interest rates. (See modified duration and effective duration). Effective duration. Measures the price volatility of a fixed income security that contains embedded options. A more accurate measure of price volatility when the cash flow characteristics of the bond change when interest rates shift. Federal funds rate. The rate of interest charged by banks for short term loans to other banks. It is established by the Federal Reserve Bank through open-market operations. Federal Open Market Committee. A committee of the Federal Reserve Board which establishes monetary policy and executes it through temporary and permanent changes to the supply of bank reserves. Ladder structure. A portfolio strategy in which a manager attempts to weight securities equally across the yield curve. Leverage. Borrowing funds in order to invest in securities which have the potential to pay earnings at a rate higher than the cost of borrowing. Liquidity. The speed and ease with which an asset can be converted to cash. Market risk. The risk that the value of securities will fluctuate with changes in overall market conditions or interest rates. Market value. The price at which a security can be traded. Marking to market. The process of posting current market values for securities in a portfolio. Maturity. The final date upon which the principal of a security becomes due and payable. Medium term note. A corporate bond which is brought to market over a period of time rather than at a single offering. Generally issued as senior unsecured obligations of the borrower. Page 4 of 7 Modified duration. Measures the percentage price volatility of a fixed income security or portfolio. Modified duration approximates the change in price for small changes in interest rates, assuming that the cash flow characteristics do not change when the yield curve shifts. Money market. The market in which short term debt instruments (Tbills, discount notes, commercial paper and banker's acceptances) are issued and traded. Mortgage Pass Through Securities. Securities collateralized with residential mortgage loans, the principal and interest payments of which are distributed, or .passed-through" to the investor. Many of these securities are issued by agencies of the federal government, including GNMA and FHLMC. Mutual fund. An entity which pools the funds of investors and invests those funds in a set of securities which is specifically defined in the fund's prospectus. Mutual funds can be invested in various types of domestic and/or international stocks, bonds and money market instruments, as set forth in the individual fund's prospectus. For most large, institutional investors, the costs associated with investing in mutual funds are higher than the investor can obtain through an individually managed portfolio. Negative convexity. A phenomenon associated with bonds which have embedded call options, it measures the rate at which duration of a callable bond gets smaller as interest rates fall. Negative convexity is an undesirable characteristics in bonds. PSA Standard Prepayment Model (PSA). A measure of mortgage prepayment activity. The model is expressed as a monthly series of annual prepayment rates. The series begins at .2% per year in the first month, and increases by .2% per year in each successive month until month 30, where it levels out at 6% per year until maturity. This series is labeled 100 PSA. 200 PSA doubles this series, and 50 PSA would cut the series in half. Option adjusted spread. A measure of the value of a bond relative to a benchmark security, which takes into account the value of the embedded option inherent in any bond that has uncertain cash flows (i.e., callable bonds). Premium. The difference between the par value of a bond and the market value of the bond, when the market value is above par. Prepayment speed. A measure of how quickly principal is repaid to investors in mortgage securities. Prepayment window. The time period over which principal repayments will be received on mortgage securities at a specified prepayment speed. Page 5 of 7 Prudent investor rule. A standard of responsibility which applies to fiduciaries. In California, the rule is stated as "Investments shall be managed with the care, skill, prudence and diligence, under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person, acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters, would use in the conduct of an enterprise of like character and with like aims to accomplish similar purposes." Realized return. The change in value of the portfolio due to interest received and interest earned and realized gains and losses. It does not give effect to changes in market value on securities which have not been sold from the portfolio. Repurchase agreement(Repo). A short-term transaction in which a bank or dealer (seller) sells a government security to an investor (buyer), with the simultaneous agreement to repurchase the security from the buyer for an agreed-upon fixed price, on a specified date. Revere repurchase agreement (Reverse Repo). A short-term transaction in which an investor (seller) sells a government security it owns to a bank or dealer (buyer) under an agreement in which the buyer agrees to sell the security back to the investor on a specified date, at an agreed-upon interest rate. Safekeeping. A service to bank customers whereby securities are held by the bank In the customer's name. Scenario analysis. A portfolio management technique that measures the performance of the portfolio under varying scenarios including, but not limited to, interest rate movements, spread changes and nonparallel yield curve shifts. Structured note. A complex, fixed income instrument which pays interest based on a formula tied to other interest rates, commodities or indices. Examples include inverse floating rate notes which have coupons that increase when other interest rates are falling, and which fall when other interest rates are rising, and "dual index floaters,"which pay interest based on the relationship between two other interest rates -for example, the yield on the ten-year Treasury note minus the Libor rate. Issuers of such notes lock in a reduced cost of borrowing by purchasing interest rate swap agreements. Total rate of return. A measure of a portfolio' performance over time. It is the internal rate of return which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending value, and includes interest earnings and realized and unrealized gains and losses on the portfolio. U.S. Treasury obligations. Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Treasuries are considered to have no credit risk, and are the benchmark for interest rates on all other securities in the US and overseas. The Treasury issues both discounted securities and fixed coupon notes and bonds. Page 6 of 7 Treasury bills. All securities issued with initial maturities of one year or less are issued as discounted instruments, and are called Treasury bills. The Treasury currently issues three- and six-month Tbills at regular weekly auctions. It also issues "cash management" bills as needed to smooth out cash flows. Treasury notes. All securities issued with initial maturities of two to ten years are called Treasury notes, and pay interest semi-annually. Treasury bonds. All securities issued with initial maturities greater than ten years are called Treasury bonds. Like Treasury notes, they pay interest semi- annually. Volatility. The rate at which security prices change with changes in general economic conditions or the general level of interest rates. Yield to Maturity (YTM). The annualized internal rate of return on an investment which equates the expected cash flows from the investment to its cost. Yield to maturity (at market). The discount rate that equates the present value of the promised cash flow (interest payments and redemption value)to the market price, assuming that all cash flows are invested at the YTM rate. Yield to maturity (at purchase cost). The YTM that equates to the purchase price of the security. Page 7 of 7 _ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O.Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Wednesday, September 17, 1997at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, September 17, 1997 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: OTHERS PRESENT: PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel John J. Collins, Joint Chair Joyce Crosthwaite, LAFCO Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair Pat McGuigan, Chair, District 1 STAFF PRESENT: Norm Eckenrode, Chair, District 2 Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Margie Rice, Chair, District 3 Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Jan Debay, Chair, District 5 Gary Streed, Director of Finance Jim Ferryman, Chair, District 6 Michelle Tuchman, Dir. of Communications Tom Saltarelli, Chair, District 7 Cymantha Atkinson, Communications Officer Shirley Dettloff, Chair, District 11 Greg Mathews, Administrative Analyst Bumie Dunlap, Chair, District 13 George Brown, Chair, FAHR Comm. Bill Steiner, County Supervisor ABSENT: Christina Shea, Chair, District 14 Todd Spitzer, County Supervisor APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Executive Committee Page 2 September 17, 1997 RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION: Receive, file and approve draft minutes of the March 19, 1997 Executive Committee meeting. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager notified the Directors that there will be an Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan meeting on October 23 to review recommendations made by the Rate Advisory Committee. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. DISCUSSION ITEM (1 Item) 1. CONSOLIDATION OF THE DISTRICTS Consider terms and conditions of the LAFCO application for consolidating the nine Districts into one District. Discussion: The General Manager reported that staff has gone through the processes that the Directors asked; special legislation was passed by the legislature to allow a specific governance system, and the LAFCO application is ready to be presented to the Joint Board and LAFCO. The issue of rate consolidation is not addressed in the application and is a separate issue that will be addressed later. Several members expressed cencem about future rate consolidation and the possibility that a simple majority could force increases for all revenue zones. It was suggested that language be included in the application stating that a super majority or a district-by-district vote be required for rate changes. Joyce Crosthwaite, LAFCO representative, indicated that setting terms and conditions on rates and voting requirements may be beyond the purview of LAFCO. These issues would be functions of the governing board. The General Manager indicated that he will be meeting with the city managers on Tuesday to discuss cost sharing for small sewer line repairs or replacements. While studying this issue, it was determined that District 7 is the only district that owns small lines; the cities and sanitary districts own the others. There are about 180 miles of these Minutes of the Executive Committee y Page 3 September 17, 1997 small lines in District 7 and no money has been set aside to repair or replace them. When this figure is included in the budgeting process, the rates for District 7 will have to be increased substantially to fund this necessary work. The cost estimate for these repairs or replacements is estimated at about$300 million, without considering any work required on the pump stations within the District. General Counsel is looking at the ownership issue of the District 7 lines, but regardless, there is an existing agreement between District 7 and the County of Orange for District 7 to take care of these lines. Huntington Beach has already done a survey and is discussing replacement or repair with the Districts on a cost-sharing basis. After extensive discussion, General Counsel advised that the statutes of the Health and Safety Code require that any changes in rates and fees must be approved by 2l3 of the vote of the body. Actions: It was moved, seconded and unanimously approved to: 1) Receive and file Staff Report ; and 2) recommend that the Joint Boards authorize staff to submit the application to LAFCO requesting consolidation of the nine Districts into one District. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Executive Committee meeting will be at the call of the Joint Chairman. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. ubmitted by: t — �ZL J Tappan, Exec iv Committee Secretary 1l' CIeWmInGM1e[ELBTFXELfAMM MINUTES FMMc V Fay Ed.Sac.U-0A, AGENDA ❑ COMM,INFO.ITEM ❑ COMM ACTION ITEM ITEM ❑ Jr.BSOS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT CNOND .DISENT) N (NONLIONEENTJ _ ICHEARING �JT.BDS.MEETING DATE ,T.005.AGENDA ITFM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Originator) POC: POO FAHR: FAHR 310,Michelle Tuchman,2050 EXEC:9117/97 EXEC All 310,Cymantha Atkinson,2056 STEER: STEER /• JT.BDS:924/97 Division Na.,Name,and Extension AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: LAFCO APPLICATION FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (All Districts). Staff requests the Executive Committee's review, approval and authorization to submit the LAFCO application for the consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Recommended Recommended Action(s): 1. Receive and file LAFCO application for the consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. 2. Authorize staff to formally submit application package to LAFCO for consideration. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed Negative Declaration Approved on February 28, 1997 Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination filed on ry CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES Rob,Buavel pw. Tm nv TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 SOURCE: JO Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:$15,000 Schedula/Llne Item:GM Contingency TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: $0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT N/A N/A $15,000.00 $15,000.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES If VES,state number: _Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Re 09141e7 Pagel of 2 H'\WP.DTAW DMIN12190WTNINSONIEXEC917`ID91797.WPD . Staff ATTACHMENTS at COMMITTEE E AGENDA(LIM): Y[7 i. 8teflnapon Appl9atw Ongin l B 2. Drefl LAFCO Applloetlon Peclage � CONCURRENCES: Signature Date Divie}'9n Tor(Or Designee) y/�/- . Staff ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(LIeI) /v/ �d 92 7. 81ea Rapatdelatl&77/87 Signature bate 2. Draft LAFCO Application Padoge Depa7 al ' y�Uy Signature Date Assistant General Manager( I Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) Additional information is included in the attached Staff Report. A copy of the draft LAFCO application is also included. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager ReNie°atn^ar Page 2 of 2 H:WP.DTAADMINUI GOIATIUNSOMEXEC9/7MI797.W PD 9/17/97 ATTACHMENT 1 Staff Report Local Agency Formation Commission Application for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are proposing to consolidate the existing nine districts into one sanitation district. The goal is to simplify the governmental structure and administrative processes, reduce the size of the Board, and stream-line decision making procedures. The new district is proposed to be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, which was recently created through special legislation specifically for the purpose of the Districts' consolidation. The new district would be governed by a 25-member board representing cities, sanitary districts, one water district and the unincorporated areas in Orange County. It is proposed that the new district would be called the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County. Background The issue of consolidation has been before the Joint Boards for over two years. At the Joint Boards' meeting on January 11, 1995, the issue was raised, and the staff was asked to evaluate it and report to the Executive Committee. Subsequently, staff reports were presented in January, February and June 1995 outlining major issues. In July 1995, the Joint Boards considered a staff recommendation to initiate consolidation under Section 4730 of the California Public Health and Safety Code. No action was taken at the July 1995 meeting. Instead, the Boards noted that the consolidation of the Districts was a complex matter and required further study. In October 1995, the firm of Ford Sauvajot Management Group was retained to prepare a comprehensive feasibility study. The final report was issued in June 1996, and the consultant's recommendation was to proceed with consolidation under Section 4730.1 of the Government Code, which would include the Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD)on the new Board's membership and expand Board membership to include double representation in some areas. The consultant recommended against the alternate consolidation option of forming under Section 4730 which reduced the Board membership, but did not include water districts in the Board membership. In response to this, staff presented the final recommendation on governance options for consolidation at the June 26, 1996 Joint Boards meeting. There was significant discussion and two issues were considered at length: the merits of consolidation, and the most appropriate code section to use to form a consolidated District. No action was taken at this meeting, and the item was tabled until September 1996. At the September 1996 Executive Committee Meeting, the committee disagreed with staffs recommendation and a vote was taken to proceed with consolidation under Section 4730- namely, the provision decreasing the Board and eliminating IRWD's seat. The reasoning behind the new recommendation was that the board would be reduced from 29 to 24 members somewhat decreasing Board costs. This recommendation was received with great controversy at the September 1996 Joint Boards meeting. After a lengthy debate, the Joint Boards agreed Staff Report-Page 1 that neither Section 4730 nor Section 4730.1 was the optimal choice and that special legislation ' would be the best solution. The item was tabled until January 1997. At its October 2, 1996 meeting, the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) requested an update on the consolidation efforts of the Districts. After a brief discussion, LAFCO staff was directed to return 10 the November hearing with a report outlining issues and options. The November 1996 LAFCO staff report recommended that LAFCO adopt its policy on initiation of consolidation, and that subsequently, LAFCO initiate consolidation of the Districts. Joint Chairman John Collins made a presentation before LAFCO requesting that LAFCO defer initiation of the consolidation since it was the Districts' intention to pursue special legislation. Chairman Collins stated that the Districts' plan was to address this issue in January, 1997 with the objective of submitting special legislation in the spring of 1997. LAFCO directed its staff"to work with CSDOC on legislative efforts and to monitor consolidation progress and delay action and (to) bring the item back to the Commission when CSDOC's work is completed and appropriate State legislation is developed to enable the consolidation to be pursued." The Joint Boards considered the consolidation issue again in February 1997. They acted to proceed with special legislation with the objective of maintaining IRWD on the consolidated Board while reducing the overall size of the Board. They also acted to support the establishment of revenue zones to initially maintain the current user fee structure and to work to equalize rates over the next several years. Governance Structure formed through Special Legislation As a result of the Joints Boards action, the Districts worked with Assemblyman Scott Baugh, who sponsored AB 769, the Districts' consolidation bill. The bill proposed to create Section 4730.65 of the Government Code which would create a governance structure tailored to the needs of the Districts. AB 769 proposed a 25-member board, which effectively met the goals of a smaller CSDOC Board, thus eliminating any double representation, while retaining IRWD on the Districts' Board. The bill was signed into law by Governor Wilson in July 1997 and will become effective January 1, 1998. A copy is included as Exhibit A. Under Section 4730.65, the 25-member board would be made up of representatives from the following jurisdictions: • Cities(21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts(2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District(1) -Irvine Ranch Water District • County(1) -County of Orange Unincorporated Area Staff Report-Page 2 • IAFCO Application The next step in the consolidation process is to submit an application to the Orange County LAFCO for its review and consideration. Staff has worked closely with LAFCO staff throughout the evolution of this issue, and they are familiar with the goals and objectives of the Districts' consolidation plan. This agenda item transmits a draft LAFCO application package. The application consists of the following documents: • Resolutions of Application: Resolutions by each of the nine(9) Districts, submitted to LAFCO to initiate the review of the consolidation proposal. • Justification Proposal: A summary document stating the reasons for formation of the consolidated District and providing comprehensive background information. • Plan of Service: A detailed report describing the functions and finances of the consolidated District during its first three years of operation. • Terms and Conditions: A listing of the recommended terms and conditions that will provide the mechanism by which the ownership and operation of the current CSDOC will be transferred to the consolidated District. The terns and conditions are guided by Government Code Section 56844. • Implementation Guidelines: A document detailing the basic steps necessary to secure implementation of the District formation. • Maps and Exhibits: Maps depicting the new District's territory and the accompanying exhibits. Budget for LAFCO Review LAFCO charges a standard filing fee of$3,900 for each application that is submitted. This fee covers the time and material costs of up to 80 hours of staff review and processing. Staff review in excess of 80 hours is charged on an hourly basis, as are any legal costs for review of the application by LAFCO counsel. As a basis for setting a budget, we asked LAFCO staff to propose a budget for additional review(both staff review in excess of 80 hours and legal review). LAFCO indicated that it is difficult to project the amount of additional review needed. CSDOC staff has offered assistance and will be providing all application materials on computer disk for LAFCO staffs use. LAFCO estimates that a budget of$5,000 in addition to the filing fee would be reasonable. This is with the understanding that if the project proves to be controversial, in nature and time intensive, additional funds may be required. All costs are charged and tracked on an hourly basis. In addition to these charges there is a CEOA filling fee of$38 and a Slate Board of Equalization fee of$750.. Bond Counsel Opinion The Districts' existing Certificates of Participation (COP) allow consolidation of the Districts. The COPS, however, include a covenant that requires a bond counsel opinion staling that the proposed consolidation will not affect their tax-exempt status. Staff anticipates that bond counsel review will cost approximately$5,000 and, pending the Joint Boards' submittal of the Staff Report-Page 3 consolidation application to LAFCO, staff will secure an opinion. This brings the project budget ' to $14,688. Conclusion The application is presented for the Executive Committee's review, approval and recommendation to the Joint Boards for adoption. Staff Report-Page 4 Exhibit A Assembly Bill No.769 CHAPTER 51 An act to add Section 4730.65 to the Health and Safety Code, relating to sanitation districts. [Appmed by Gwemcrluly 5,1997.Med with ee S t"of state iwy 8,i9v7.1 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGFSr AB 769, Baugh Orange County Sanitation District formation. Existing law, the County Sanitation District Act,provides for the formation,consolidation,officers,and sets forth the powers of,county sanitation districts. This bill would,notwithstanding other provisions of law,require a sanitation district in Orange County created by prescribed consolidation to be referred to as a consolidated sanitation district for purposes of this provision and would specify the composition and organization of its governing board. The people of the State of C mrnie do enact as follows. SECTION 1. Section 4730.65 is added to the Health and Safety Code,to read: 4730.65. (a) Notwithstanding Sections 4730,4730.1 and 4730A or any other provision of law,a sanitation district in Orange County,that bas been created by the consolidation,pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Loral Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Division 3 (commencing with Section 56000),Title 6,Cov..C.),of one or more sanitation districts, originally established pursuant to Section 4730, and one or more sanitation districts,originally established pursmant to Section 4730.1,shall be referred to,for purposes of this section only, as a consolidated sanitation district and the governing body shall be constituted in accordance with Subdivision (b). (b) The governing body of the consolidated sanitation district shall be a board of directors composed of all of the following: (1) One member of the city council of each city located wholly or partially within the district's boundaries provided, however, a city within the consolidated district,the sewered portion of which city lies entirely within another sanitary district,shall have no representation on the board. (2) One member of the county board of supervisors. (3) One member of the governing body of each sanitary district, the whole or part of which is included in theconsolidated sanitation district. 96 Staff Report-Page 5 Ch. 51 —2— (4) One member of the governing body of a public agency empowered to and engaged in the collection, transportation, treatment,or disposal of sewage and which was a member agency of a sanitation district consolidated into a consolidated sanitation district. (c) The governing body of the county and each city, sanitary district, and public agency that is a member agency having a representative on the board of directors of the consolidated sanitation district, may designate one of its members to act in the place of its regular member in his or her absence or his or her inability to act (d) No action shall be taken at any meeting of the consolidated district's board of directors unless a majority of all authorized members of the board of directors is in attendance. (e) A majority of the members of the board of directors present shall be required to approve or otherwise act on any matter except as otherwise required by law. O 96 Staff Report-Page 6 ATTACHMENT Application to the Local Agency Formation Commission Proposing Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County LAFCO Justification Proposal Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Introduction The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are proposing to consolidate the existing nine districts into one sanitation district. The goal is to simplify the governmental structure and administrative processes, reduce the size of the Board, and streamline decision-making procedures. The new consolidated district is proposed to be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, and would be governed by a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. The new district would be called the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County. What are the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and what do they do? The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) are publicly owned wastewater treatment agencies that provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services for approximately 2.2 million people in central and northwest Orange County. The Districts operate and maintain the third largest facilities of their kind west of the Mississippi River. During 1994195, an average of 244 million gallons per day(MGD) of wastewater was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids)were produced. The Districts' service area encompasses a 470-square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. The Districts' revenues are derived from service and connection fees, properly tax revenues, investment interest and borrowing. The Districts are actually nine individual districts that exist independently of each other but participate together pursuant to a joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of joint facilities. The individual districts are co-participants in an agreement which was drafted in 1958 and revised in 1985 that provides for the joint construction, ownership and operation of the treatment plants, trunk sewers, pumping stations and two modem wastewater treatment plants. The Districts process wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7, which are located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. What type of facilities do the Districts own and operate? The nine member districts, operating the Joint Facilities, own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent though an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. Plant Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley about four miles from the coast adjacent to the Santa Ana River at the 405 Freeway. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity of 108 MGD, and secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD. Plant Treatment Plant No. 2 is located 1,500 feet from the mouth of the Santa Ana River on Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 286 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 75 MGD of the total flow. LAFCO Application-Page 1 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Justification Proposal How are the Districts funded and how are the costs allocated? The Districts have a variety of revenue sources available for operating and capital expenses. The major revenue sources are as follows: • Property Taxes User Fees • Connection Fees • Industrial Waste User Fees • Interest Earnings These five sources have generally accounted for more than 90 percent of the total revenue to the Districts. The importance of each revenue source varies from District to District. Each District is supported by its own budget. Collectively, the Districts utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay revolving accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs. These costs are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow. The cost of new plant construction and other necessary facilities is similarly allocated to each District. The Districts rely on a joint staff for administration, operations and maintenance. Who governs the current Districts? The Districts consist of nine independent special districts. Each District has its own Board of Directors, made up of mayors and members of city councils, directors of independent special districts and members of the County Board of Supervisors representing unincorporated areas within our Districts. There are currently 29 Directors, but the current governance structure allows for up to 54 Directors. An individual may serve on more than one District Board if parts of his/her agency lies within more than one District. Each Board is responsible for matters related to its District, however, the Boards meet as a joint board on matters of shared interest and responsibility, including the Joint Facilities. An individual District's responsibilities cannot be decided by the Joint Boards, but only by the individual District's Board. Why is a change being considered? Today there is growing public concern over the number of special districts serving the needs of California residents. This concern stems from the desire to improve customer service while decreasing duplicative layers of governmental bureaucracy. A change in the Districts' structure is being proposed to simplify governance structures and administrative processes, reduce the size of the Board and, streamline decision-making procedures. What alternatives were considered? Basically two altematives were considered-namely, to consolidate or to remain a joint operation of nine individual districts. Since their inception in 1947, the Joint Boards of Directors have reviewed the concept of consolidation several times. The 1981-82 Grand Jury issued a report recommending that the Boards consolidate the then seven Sanitation Districts into one district with Board membership based on a smaller group of elected representatives. In 1983, the Joint Boards determined that the Districts' operations were functionally consolidated under the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, and no significant overall benefit would accrue by reorganizing into a single district. However, a subsequent consolidation effort began in January, 1995 with staff being directed to further research the issue. The results of this research have led to the current recommendation to forth a LAFCO Application-Page 2 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Justification Proposal consolidated district. Consolidation would complete the process of providing the existing Districts joint operations with a more efficient governance and decision-making structure. Based on the recommendation to create a consolidated District, several formation alternatives were considered. The new District will be formed under Section 4730.65 of the California Health and Safety Code. This is discussed in greater detail later in this report. What are the benefits of creating a new district? Forming a consolidated District can be seen as the final step in what the existing Districts have been working toward in the operation and administration of the Joint Facilities. While the current Districts have acted largely in a consolidated manner, they have not realized the full benefits of functioning as one consolidated agency. It is believed that the proposed consolidation will result in more direct and equitable governance of the wastewater system, more effective and efficient operations and administration of the treatment facilities, better use of existing resources, more opportunities for regional benefit and some modest administrative and financial savings. More Direct and Eaudable Governance Currently, the nine districts are represented by nine separate and individual Boards of Directors. These nine autonomous Boards of Directors vote independently on District issues and collectively on joint works matters. While this structure ensures local governance and representation at the district level, It can become skewed and inequitable at the Joint Boards' level. In several cases, a city is represented on more than one of the individual District Boards because city boundaries are not necessarily contiguous with District boundaries. When a Joint Works'vote is taken, that city is entitled to cast a vote on each of the Districts Boards where it is a member. The result is that, at the Joint Boards level, jurisdictions which fall into more than one District have several votes, whereas other jurisdictions, regardless of size, may have only one. In addition to this inequity in representation,for a matter to be approved at a Joint Works' level a majority of the individual District Boards must approve it. For example, five of the nine District Boards must approve a project for it to go forward. This simple majority of boards, however, does not always reflect the tally of the individual Board members voting. Due to the existence of multiple representation, a project may be approved by a majority of the Joint Boards, but if the vote were to be tallied based on a direct count of Board members, that same project could fail. Consolidation of the individual districts would result in a wastewater treatment system governed in a direct and unified manner. Only one consolidated Board would exist and that board would be comprised of members who had one vote for their local constituencies. Board membership is discussed later in this report. More Effective and Efficient Operations and Administration With the existence of the nine individual district's voting on joint projects, there is an inherent potential for disagreement on the operation or administration of those facilities. While the history of the Districts reflects much consensus building and accord, there is the possibility that any group of Districts could disagree on the most prudent course of current or future operation of the Joint Facilities. For example, a significant opportunity to reduce the need for expanded capacity,at the plants may be possible by doing some local improvements in the older collection systems that have in-flow problems. Will one District willingly agree to spend millions of dollars to correct its local problems, in order to save twice that amount for the other eight Districts? As the local infrastructure ages, these issues will become problematic. LAFCO Application-Page 3 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Justification Proposal The mere potential for this type of disagreement decreases, to some extent, the ultimate efficiency or effectiveness of an organization. Whenever an agency is forced to consider the independent views of nine voting boards, more time and energy must be spent on the analysis, development and implementation of a project. Consolidation of the existing Districts into one single District would eliminate the potential for the Districts to be found at cross purposes. The Board would act as one entity, advancing the goals and objectives of the collective constituency. Similarly, efficiency and some level of increased effectiveness would be realized from staff serving that one single entity instead of nine districts. Better Use of Euistine Resources Although the Districts have functioned in a consolidated manner for numerous years, there are still opportunities for a consolidated agency to make better use of existing resources. By shifting the Districts' focus from the separateness of the individual agencies, the new consolidated District would be able to expend that energy evaluating new opportunities for the agency to pursue. The time and effort that would be saved on the administration of the individual Districts could be spent focusing the consolidated District on larger regional issues that could produce cost savings or environmental benefits to the District. More Opportunities for Recional Benefit A consolidated District would be better positioned to consider and act on regional issues. The new District would represent the residents of 23 of the County's 31 cities which produce 90 percent of the county-wide wastewater Flow. A consolidated District could more effectively utilize its resources and membership to address larger regional issues such as the potential for a large scale reclamation project or lower-cost operating strategies. The size and singular consensus demonstrated by the consolidated District would facilitate regional development and coordination of wastewater related projects. Administrative and Financial Savings Administrative benefits would occur from the consolidation of record keeping. While these benefits would not represent significant cost savings to the District, the benefit would be realized in a more streamlined and effective way of doing business. Financial benefits could be realized from the savings in the cost of future borrowings. The cost of borrowing for the financing of essential infrastructure is affected by the credit worthiness of the issue. When several districts combine to issue long-term debt, credit rating agencies are greatly influenced by the so-called'weakest link". In other words, the district which rates lowest in credit worthiness sets the credit rating level for the entire issue. While this may result in only a few basis points of additional interest costs, the long-term effect can be several hundreds of thousands of dollars over the life of the issue. For example, the difference between an interest cost of 4.50% reduced to 4.25%for an issue of $25,000,000 over 20 years can save ratepayers between $420,000 to $780,000, depending on the debt structure. Another potential financial benefit would come from an increased market for the District COPS. Current buyers who do not completely understand the functional organization of the Districts may opt to purchase securities that are easier to explain. If more investors become interested, the interest costs will decline. Also, in the past, the Districts have backed their Certificates of Participation (COP) issues with letters of credit resulting in AAA ratings. Consolidation may provide an opportunity to evaluate the need for letters of credit for future debt issuances or to obtain other credit enhancement at a lower cost. LAFCO Application-Page 4 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Justification Proposal What would the new District do? The new District would fulfill the same mission as the current Districts (both independently and acting as a Joint Board). Since the formation in 1947, the Joint Boards have been acting collectively, and functionally serving as a consolidated Board while maintaining independent District status. The consolidation of the nine Districts into one agency would simply clarify and expedite the new District's ability to meet its primary goal;to protect public heath and environment through excellence in wastewater systems. The responsibilities, obligations and future facility plans of the newly consolidated District would not change as a result of the consolidation itself. It is possible, however, that the consolidated District would find itself in a position to better accommodate new or changing roles in wastewater management. By streamlining the Districts' govemance and decreasing the administrative procedures, the new District may be better positioned to pursue new ventures that advance today's wastewater treatment or make more use of its existing resources. What would be the statutory authority of the new District and who would govem it? The new District would be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. This code section was recently created by AB 769 (Baugh) signed by Governor Wilson in July, 1997. It will become law January 1, 1998. The Districts sought special legislation because existing code sections would have limited how a consolidated District's Board of Directors was comprised. Existing law would have either excluded the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) from the Board or included IRWD, along with five additional agencies that would give double representation to some smaller cities. Although, one of the major goals of the consolidation is to decrease the size of the Board, it is important as well, that IRWD be a member of the District's Board, as it is an established equity holder in the treatment plant and it represents a considerable portion of the Districts' population. Consolidating the Districts under Section 4730.65 accomplishes both these purposes. The proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities(21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts(2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District(1)-Irvine Ranch Water Distdct • County(1) -County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) LAFCO Application-Page 5 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Justification Proposal LAFCO has recently acted to create a subsidiary district in Garden Grove, which resulted in the Garden Grove Sanitary District being dissolved and replaced on the Consolidated Sanitation District Board by the City of Garden Grove.. Are there benefits to the customers of the system? Yes, there are several benefits to the District's customers. The customers will benefit from a more direct governance structure, where their local representative will have a direct voting impact on the matters before the Board for consideration. There no longer will be the possibility that, due to multiple representation or a split vote among the nine Districts' Boards, decisions could be unduly influenced by a voting majority. The customers will also benefit from an improvement in service delivery. While it is not likely to be a benefit that the average resident recognizes on a daily basis, there will be an increase in overall efficiencies as a result of streamlining the nine agencies into one consolidated organization. While service delivery may not ostensibly change, the ability of the organization to use its resources more effectively will likely present opportunities of the District to enter into new ventures that are central to the District's mission while working-smarter. Finally, the customer will benefit from the recognition that government has responded to the voice of the electorate and is working diligently to reduce the number of government units. This consolidation is evidence of local government responding to citizens'ooncems and working to make an already efficient and effective operation more responsive to the public's needs. Although the Districts have historically functioned in a consolidated manner, it is this current effort that will formally adopt the organizational changes and make them the foundation for the agency s development in years to come. Will there be a rate increase because of the consolidation? No, there will not be a rate increase as a result or mandate of the consolidation. The consolidation will provide the new District the opportunity to evaluate administration and operations of the wastewater facilities and recognize increased efficiencies wherever possible. There may be modest cost savings recognized from merging the nine individual agencies into one streamlined organization. Independent of the consolidation, however, the Districts did experience a rate adjustment in July, 1997. For the past seven years user fees had remained the same in the Districts' service area. Property taxes, however, had not kept pace with debt service and the Districts had been using reserves to meet current capital requirements. The Districts were proud of their record of no rate increases for seven years, but recognized that any infrastructure must change and develop in order to stay current with demand, customer-base, technology and environmental regulations. Portions of the service area with aging infrastructure required rehabilitation and other areas, experiencing growth, needed to fund sewer expansion projects to meet increased capacity. The Districts are dedicated to maintaining their record of service excellence to the residents of Orange County. To do that it requires sufficient funds for capital projects to meet their customers' needs. To ensure that there are no rate impacts to the customers as a direct result of consolidation, initially revenue zones are proposed to be established within the consolidated District. These zones' existing boundaries would provide the administrative mechanism for the existing debt of the different geographic areas to be kept separate and the rate schedule to remain unchanged. In the future, a consolidated Board may look toward equalized rate structure where the wastewater system's infrastructure is supported by a uniform District-vide user fee. That, however, is not proposed at this time and is not part LAFCO Application-Page 6 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Justification Proposal of the consolidation application. What are the environmental impacts? Because the Districts have been functioning in a consolidated manner for years, no negative environmental impacts are anticipated. The consolidated District would have an identical territory as the existing Districts, and the current permits guiding the Districts' operations would remain in place, monitoring the actions of the consolidated District. The existing Districts have an outstanding record of environmental stewardship in Orange County, and as part of the agency's mission, strives for excellence in wastewater treatment. Any resulting benefit from the consolidation of the Districts would complement this record of environmental awareness and success. When would the Districts consolidate? The consolidation of the Districts could happen any time after the LAFCO approval process has been completed. It is proposed, however, that consolidation be implemented July 1, 1998, to be consistent with the start of the new fiscal year. Where can I get more information about this proposal? The proposed consolidation of the Districts is discussed in further detail in the County Sanitation Districts of Omnae County Final Consolidation Report prepared by Ford Sauvajot Management Group, Inc. This report is on file with the Districts and is available for review. It is also included in the Districts' application to LAFCO for consolidation. LAFCO Application-Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. —APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET,SEQ. WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally formed and organized in 1947-48 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established, and the current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and, WHEREAS, over the years, the continuation of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may make request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and, LAFCO Application-Page 8 WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. _ is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and, WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor district; and, WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency as is permitted, but not required by Government Code Section 56800(b); and, WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited, and, WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and Board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the District that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. LAFCO Application- Page 9 Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing Board shall be as provided in California Government Code Section 4730.65. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the Executive Officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 LAFCO Application -Page 10 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held 1997. LAFCO Applicatlon-Page 11 Exhibit A - Map of Current Boundaries of County Sanitation District No. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ram, .Cy LA HABRA oy �eF BREA Jy Q ON YORBA 13 LACENTIA LINDA sE9s CYLM�M/I M LA �7UENA PALMPARK �o s ANANCYPRESSI VILLA LOS C STANTON PARK LAMTTOS t a RANGE B +� GARDEN S IN ) GRO 8 P�]UNT ALLEY HUNjiNGIT N PACIFIC OCEAN A' COST MESA IRVINE � t NEWPORT BEACH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS N OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LAFCO Application-Page 12 SAVM-CIA.COR CSDOC 1195 Exhibit B - Map of Proposed Boundaries of County Sanitation District No. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGEL.5 COUNTY LA HABRA 14,h', �REA ON YORBA Ay I `"�""•N LACENTIA LINDA -9,, OJ? I owame d. I 1 9s0 LL JJ c0 pUENA PALM umPA�K yO9 .wwl CYPRF ANAHEIM VILLA p ALAMITOS STANTON 1" PARK � I RANGE a Y GARDEN GRO STM! B s .., . ..MN IN. . ANA ...r...N FOUNTA + 4... ALLEY HUN NGrr N I °0.4 � • AY PACIFIC OCEAN "" COST MESA IRVINE ,e NEWPORT BEACH N LAFCO Application-Page 13 SRVM-CLA.CDR CSDOC 1195 Exhibit C LAFCO Application Terms & Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC") shall be consolidated into one single county sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Sections 4730 et seq.) and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County ("District"). [G.C. §56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC' refers to the nine Districts, both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. At the time of consolidation, the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions: [G.C. §56844(n)] • County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Santa Ana Buena Park La Habra Seal Beach Cypress La Palma Stanton Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Tustin Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District 3. Directors of District shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. LAFCO Application-Page 14 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from existing CSDOC to new District as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC, as of the effective date of the consolidation, shall be transferred to District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1997, [G.C. §56844(b)] 6. District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by District. [G.C. §56844(t)] 8. The formation of Special Zones within District, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4850, are to collectively include any or all portions of the entire CSDOC service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the attached map. The Special Zones shall continue the existing rate structures from the individual CSDOC districts until such time as District's Board of Directors may find it appropriate to make revisions. [G.C. §56844(e)] 9. All agreements by and between any two or more existing CSDOC's, including but not limited to: joint sewer ownership or use, construction or maintenance of facilities, shall be terminated upon the effective date of the consolidation. The termination of the agreements is appropriate in recognition of the new District assuming full and exclusive ownership and authority over all rights, duties and obligations of all existing CSDOC's. 10. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to carry out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. LAFCO Application-Page 15 11. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the obligation to levy taxes, charges, assessments, or fees in order to make payment of said indebtedness to District. [G.C. §56844(c)] 12. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to District at then-current levels. Memorandums of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred to the new District. [G.C. §56844(I)] 13. Permits issued to CSDOC by any federal, state or local regulatory authority, shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to: CSDOC's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. §56844(v)] 14. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. §56844(c)] 15. District shall assume all existing contracts and obligations presently in full force and effect with CSDOC and which have not otherwise been specifically referenced herein. [G.C. §56844(m)] 16. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. [G.C. §56844(p)] LAFCO Application-Page 16 Map of Special Zone 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY @, LA HABRA19, `4y eF9q, B)qFA � M q �� 13 �..n.. N YOABA ewrW.m LACENTIA LINDA 92 i s `2 II rva 2 ��CO y�9 LA �UENA PALM � IK 11 ANAHEIM a VILLA C goy •., q CY flE55 LOS s "*�I'� PARK LAMROS STANTON N O RANGE @ � e GAROEN GAO s Q 1a 8 F�jUNTA ,,,,,VALLEY HU NGR N q.n• PACIRc OC^�AN '" COST MESA IRVINE 5 NEWPOA7 BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA W.W 1989 LAFCO Application-Page 17 SRVM-CLFLCDFI CSDOC 1195 Map of Special Zone 2 um ANOMM COUNry q�Sy LA HAB EA 4 lxp sE]No/4.„ 9 yO UENA �o r pppp PALM umw..dK y ANAHEIM O uum CYPR S 1 ? AWCar< OS i s STANTONas `- FrT A A I � . . aR14 Lg , � e i II sANr ` 14 11 F I ANA . ..,J gF 3UNTA .... ALLEY r HU NGT N `•y .A. PACIFIC OCEAN A.. COST IRVINE MESA OS NBEACHT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 LAFCO Appilcabon-Page 18 sRVM-CLR.GDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY r.m Oa ~6P I EA IYI.A.A.• I Y�MI n m• x H., N .v.. we YORBA 13 eYw..n LACEN7IA LINDA P. 9F i >>•¢ PALE( 4^: .s R , VILLA ,D v ....005�, ANTOtk PARK RAN E _, s GARD GRO I a.ve.kr � am�omMve:: mxn k 7 11 > sANA 14 ANA NUS a co OC PACIFIC MESA IRVINE NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 LAFCO Application-Page 19 SRVM-CL FI.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY w.mt.0 O�Irk.�'e LA HABRA 8 EA Y,ns wp �� 13 ON YORBA LACENTIA LWDA 42F .2 9$Oct` LL CO .4e LA pU A �Ov' PALM u+dl,rP„A.�IC ' ANAH I e VILLA O v Yure CYPR BA N LOS STANTON q LAMITOS f O IRAN— PARK dE 8� v� RROOEN 1 wm.un.n nur.r 7 17 SANT f 14 ANA UNTA t ...: ALLEY I r HUN NGR N �'•. .Yr.. PACIRC OCEAN COST MESA IRVINE BEACH' N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 LAFCO Application-Page 20 SRVM-CL-R.CDR "nnr. 1/95 Map of Special Zone 6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S� LAHABRA BREA mco OON .� YORBA 13 9 y.. °1"""'•^ pLACENTIA LINDA 9 o" IgIUppA y�a LA ubuA..dK PALM ANAHEIM VILLA 40 �Oy vuAl CYPRESS I n PARK LOS LAMITO F k 3 STANTON RAN E s Y GARDEN GRO 1� 7 g 11 SANT 14 ANA F�utrrlh ALLEY HU [ NNT N 6 PACIFIC m OCEAN IRVINE 3 � NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 LAFCO Application-Page 21 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY w.m.. 141f,"BP 0 PP MR F-A q..Yab 6YD ,ry __ ON YORBA 13 �+. I I`""'""•'" LACENTIA LINDA 9s CITY 2 � C LA �e U A �y PALMA PARK Aw ANAHEIM VILLA O .. . CYPRESS PARK LOS ; STANTON p LAMITO¢ I (D I RAN E �a C i GARD N i GRO � I STE e O 1( 1C• R Y - i 17 SANT ' ' 14 ANA .,.,..,,., R ..,2 ALLEY HUN NGR N y . 1GW.N O < e . Al. COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE , .tf OJ NBEACH BEACH �IInI'n U N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 LAFCO Application-Page 22 SRVM•CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 11 LOS ANGELES COUNTY _ He LA HABRAO�,�q'L.,q rl/MIIW wr AEA by ten. ONE mmo YORBA 13 9 °M""'"•"` LACENTIA LINOA . QSO 2 / O LA y�y U pp A PALM A ,P„ ' y ANAHEIM I VILLA C CY R S I II PARK LOBOS C . STANTON RANaE s rS GAROEN GRO � 1 S 6 w.e.r.ra.vr mwn 7 i ie r n 'n4 lip, ANA SANT �4 HU N N O ' t, PAC OCEAN `. COST MESA IRVINE t O NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .. .r OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 LAFCO nppiicaaon-Page 23 SRVM-CLR.CDR Csooc 1195 Map of Special Zone 13 LOS ANOELES COU rV LA HABABRA .40 4�w Y...... ON YORBA q II ""•'""'•^ LACENTiA LINDAo., ' .(� owlunro .n ' y �qS i L U A A ag CC P dK pppp PALM umu... ANAHEIM CY R S Jn VILLA LOS O LAMITOS S S STANTON PARK RANGE s GARDEN GRO I j p wmawnm mn 1 11 t SAN7 14 ANA .,,,...,,. F UNTA e ,.e ALLEY HUN NGT N ". PACIFlC OCEAN COST MESA IRVINE ' O NE"ORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 989 LAFCO Application-Page 24 SRVM-CLR.CDR ,,,nr v0F Map of Special Zone 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s, ..rma• Oq. �eF LA HABRA vaaa.w C, 41b Yaf.811 10 utlaWC O ON ORBA 13 q °M"'""'•v° LACENTIA LINDA ZF qs oA.l ano as i0 2 FC O ¢y LA NI I UENA pp �C>4' PALM WAivdK i I ANAHEIM VILLA O CYPRESS .+ PARK LAMMOS e LOS O IIN RANGE � 8 a y rs GAROEN GRO 11 sANT 14 ANAr. rr•.` MUN NGT N PACIRC .a .. OCEAN MOSTESA Oa NEWPORT BEACH 'ryAul� U N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 LAFCO Application-Page 25 SRVM-CLA.CDR CSDOC 1195 Exhibit D Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County L INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Government Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine(9)existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 at seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County(District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District. The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District. jL DESCRIPTION OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a politics[ subdivision of the State of Ca[ifomia and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and, if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, one assistant general manager, eight department heads, for an authorized staff of 560 full time equivalents for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Types of Services, Level, and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1996-1997, an average daily sewage influent Flow of 244 million gallons per day(MGD)was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the Mississippi, with assets valued at more than $1 billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean ouffall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. LAFCO Application -Page 26 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD currently being expanded to 80 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 186 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 90 MGD of the total Flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities -As of June 30, 1997 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area (estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Primary Treatment Capacity(includes standby) Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Total Primary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Plant No.2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . g0 Total Secondary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 156 MGD Total Ca -gcity . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . d50 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 MGD Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 MGD Total Average Daily Flow . . . ...... . . . . . 244 MGD LAFCO Application-Page 27 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7,which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1997: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant and equipment $804,200,000 $321,300,000 $1,135.500,000 Less accumulated $310,200.000 depreciation Net property, plant and equipment 5825.300.000 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash Flow requirements, and other reserves. The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $28.021,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11.221,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 59,724,000 Capital Reserves 49,233,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 4,484,000 Flood/Earthquake Insurance Reserves 81,450,000 Rate Stabilization Funds 141,200.000 Total $375,333,000 LAFCO Application-Page 28 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1997, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $397,575,000. These issues include $397,45,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $30,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds.The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and As rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. The Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget provides for$32,620,000 to service the debt on the various COPS issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 1 1. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, the new County Sanitation District assessments all predecessor district obligations. Further, the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPS) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 560 full-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firth of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $46,922,650. Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently,there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees, their occupational status, or their benefits. LAFCO Application-Page 29 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through user fee charges to the Irvine Ranch Water District. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. In May, 1997, The Board of Directors adopted a user rate increase fee schedule that provides for gradual rate increase over the next five years for six of the nine districts. This represents that first user rate increase in seven years. The Districts have been able to avoid user fee increases by reducing operational costs through reorganizing and streamlining Districts operations, holding vacant positions open, and deferring new facilities. However, because the Districts'capital improvement program's debt service obligations continued to increase beyond the level of its primary funding source, i.e. property tax revenues, and because of the additional capital improvement requirements, increase in user fees became inevitable. The following is the adopted Annual Sewer Service Fee Rate Schedule District 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 1 $91.36 $100.27 $110.04 $120.77 $132.55 2 $73.00 $75.00 $77.00 $80.00 $82.00 3 $75.00 $76.00 $77.00 $78.00 $80.00 5 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 6 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 $86.00 7 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 $80.00 11 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $101.25 $113.91 13 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3, pages 1-13, of the Budget document for summary information. Ill. DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC, and which utilize joint operating,working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant LAFCO Application-Page 30 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service to the California County Sanitation District Act(Health and Safety Code Section 4700 at seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services, Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine (9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District' s organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 25 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District • County (1) -County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District LAFCO Application-Page 31 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan.Attachment A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements Budget. jY. IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. V. IMPACTS ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective dale is proposed as July 1, 1998. YL IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly, there are no anticipated impacts. LAFCO Application-Page 32 9/5/97 Consolidated Sanitation Distrd of Orange Countv Projected Budgets Fiscal Years 1998-99 Thru 2000-01 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 9,317.000 $ 10,714,000 $ 12.322,000 Sewer Service Fees 66,938,000 68,907,000 72.436,000 Fees From Other Agencies 6,150,000 4,700,000 5,250,000 Connection Fees 6,784,000 8,065,000 9,727,000 Interest 22.443.000 22,420,000 21,749,000 Miscellaneous & Other 2,640,500 4,141.500 4,141.500 Property Taxes 30,572,000 30,565,000 30,562,000 New COP Issues 53,200,000 57.000.000 62,400,000 Total Revenues $ 197,1544,500 $ 206,512,500 $ 218,587,500 Requirements Collection System O&M Expenses $ 9,653,000 $ 10,804,000 $ 10,527,000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 47,861,000 48,818,000 49,794,000 Collection System Improvements 20,997,000 24,902,000 28,497,000 Treatment System Improvements 70.086,000 78,429,500 96,380,500 GO Bond Principal& Interest 16,000 16,000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 2,660,000 2,850,000 3.120,000 COP Service& Retirement 37.772,000 42,590,000 47,834,000 Total Expenses $ 188.945.000 $ 208,409,500 $ 234,152.500 Revenue Exceeding Expenses $ 8.099,500 $ (1,897,D00) $ (15,565,000) Beginning Cash Balances 385,031,450 393,130,950 391,233.950 Ending Cash Balances $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233.950 $ 375.668,950 Appropriations. Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $ 28.800.000 $ 30,121,000 $ 30,737,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,483,000 11.925,000 12,064,000 Capital Projects Completion 49.995,000 49,946,200 49,540,100 Environmental Requirements Reserve 4,634,000 4,484,000 4,484,000 Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 38,359,000 41,133,000 44,230,000 "Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 27,705,350 31,244,600 35,022,350 Property &Liability Catastrophe Reserve 89,752,850 9D,971,850 91.208,250 Rate Stabilization Funds 142,401,750 131,408,300 108,383,250 $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,66B,950 Unappropriated Cash & Investment Balances $ $ - $ - LAFCO Application -Page 33 County Sanitation District No. 1 Bdmdu%of D6bk1 CODec"On SYSIM PrajgCb CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A a C 0 E F 0 N 1 ! R L TOM L09T I Pfl10R YEAR9 BIAOET E9TflE0 E9T REO E9T REO E9TRE0 FNE EOTlYFARB TEN C09T I( PROJECT TO WL'1 111RCINBE9 IW1W IW6W 10BL]OOD xa0001 xODlm YFAa TOTK x0W1001 YFM TOTK COMPIEI r s�/y.,TI{I�pR 'OMEN^-"�I .alm f.W.ml.naw.Rclad. xW.ODO xl.ODp Il.00D xfpOD 25,000 25.00) MOMO 1M." MOJ '61ATOTK CAP.IMPROJEMENIPAi141MM1OV xW.ODO xl.elB W,aW a,m xsao! xe,mo IW.aW 1xl.oOD BEINROfOx PRD�cr! I.B.nI.M. svw—RMro.lil !.]W.Im ISAIW - 1e.000 e}H.aDJ E.]W.aOY }.9unlvwm UN R.h&.(11F.11•(w%) IIB.WB W." W.WO WOOD 110.000 MOpW ].D/v ROM MNnM RN (1) WO.WO WOW MOM tw.m x]O.OW MOM T.MY V,W rxxMRroro.11) MOOD - WOO 100.000 1W.ODO "OOGO MOOD 1.deaM.BiA.W MPOd.R.Oro.111 M.000 WOOD tw.= 150,000) WOOD WOOOU e,RA am 0 aroro.It) t]0,000 TOO,OOD TW,ODO BO6T0TK RE/NBMATION FROMM TOTO,000 ".000 WOW IW.ODO MOOD 300000 MSAOD e.106,0OD 7.110.000 DRAIW TOM CMITK IMPROVEMENT! ?,=.00D - 100.000 1 WOOD I IW,ODO 1 315.000 1 OxsOOD 1 OOOODO I @,M.OW I TAx0,OD0 • PM.YO dbTOreICNO.1 1.M TER�OFACILIREa BC1rEO OFORFM MMMOACON9TRMUM LAFCO Application-Page 34 County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedule of District Collectlan Byatem Pmjaa* CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A a C 0 E F O N 1 J K L TOT&COST PRIDRTEAR6 BUDGET I ESTREO EST REa E3TRE0 MOM FNE E6TBYFAR TEN C091"T0 FRmECT TOM" Flot"SES I01-911 I1,95-911 IMM 2012001 1001-0] TFAR TOM 2W2-21307 1'FAN TOTA COMPLIM TNR&MMOVEMEMS411CREASE CAPACOy I.Reylse.EWM R~Th k hew.P.1 W View(1) ATm.mO B.Tm.ma B.1W.0130 2.ReplSu Mof Ne "PI WTank 2401(2) 6.5430,000 250.0010 2.000.o410 22m,m0 2.2Sam0 e.5W.W0 2.Repho IdCypve.s Ass.6 K 24R(2) 5.10.0110 mG00 2.000,0011) 3.01)(1.030 M. m B.tm,Bm B.]W.000 /.TMInI. p?.Sew,293(1) I.600.000 - - 1.6m.om I.BW.= ttom 21m11 Rata111) 225.01X) - 125,000 125.000 B.Btlu Sew Reldlll IW.mO - 400.001) 2611,000 /.Stint.M.MmIm IB AR.IIRMd.2i1.111 N,sN,= M.oW 250.000 2.000.003 11,000,000 6,000,000 12.15MM t.=.= MIMI W B.C.rOm C.npn DFm TMA6sAa{PA.Ae�e1121 1,]]6.OW I1B.W0 t.6m.OW 1Wma 1,114m0 1.116.Om wlaTol&cw.avflDul�n6nNulEAae uP. x,n..mB M.WO I1B.W0 itWWO I,tm,mo B]SO,WO e,fico,9m t1,11B.Om ISe6lam te.n9,fiao 1.Ae.lmn»mltll'a5.11k.1A.ry 61M M M.ma - M,Wo 1,000) IWoOU m6.OW 2.6.meM.Wver lntr M.nlab BA¢e...2-IL61NT1) 6.052110) 451,030 M[00 2W,W0 2.000.000 I.O0D.W0 Moog 4,0110.0m 4.1103,000 3.91 F..n.62lVMe iv PMetl.,2-7A" I05.000 62,000 Mato - - 15.000 11.000 1.FSFrt6waTNNsetgk*) L2 m.25 •• IUD.= IS. UWON)O M.000 91,0120 M.000 6.F5 Fn Ve6ml16 PMnl,2J - 24.000 /,01)) W,mO - - "'to, atoat - 6.S.I.M.RAw Intr51M aI10.t.R.P.mP6 225.00) IS." 250,Cm 221.000 M.0010 q p StelM Sll.wemnfi.,237•(tM) 1911,11M 3.M 410,000 W.mO 110.000 I26.W0 293,000 295.0)0 6.MI. 1W.P*dl MM I00.000 IW,mO Im.000 1W.W0 loom 24000) IW,WO 600.030 SOOTOT&CAP.BPROVEIBOJfSIR131Fe1J1Y e.1113.100 Mim B1B4O130 BM,000 2200,010 L223.000 2W.000 6,991,000 2W,000 6.261.000 HWAMUjAMQHffiQlEM I.Ee d Trunk Muibl.RM.0,24I1 952,000 In.OW i0m0 120.000 toh5o Bm.soB e20.OW 2.1; MGwo.Muflhat Tln2E.aenm6,2.T6 t6pDJ 16.W0 6U&TOT&REIN/MARON PRDJECTI /9B.Om 1]B.WO 10,W0 T20.000 ]0,W0 - MO.WO MO.Om GRNDA TOT&CAPR&R�NOVEMET116 M,6l1.100 7M.iW ]M.OW S.f6�,OW B?1oAW IO.�Mp00 6AlO.mO 2B.Bfi1.OW 13.B]I.WO 41.161.000 • P.nl.ry n.eaWomn omlla. \ "Coq.lo bnln4..eq M Cehn. 1.MA61Efl�PlANB:D FACRRIE9lipIEgAEDF011 F1111giE aE61aN OA DONSIRUCItON 2,CONIEMPIATEO FOR FUME WUSTE ii MSIGN {COIbTRIK w LAFCO Application-Page 35 1 1 .. County Sanitation District No. 3 Schpduh Ol ClArlcl COIWIl0n BpbM PrOldllt CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A E C 0 E F 0 X 1 J % l TOTALCOST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO ESTREG ESTREO ESTPEO FNE EST5K1P5 TEN COSTTO FROJECT TO= PURCHASES THIN HAS-00 1552]m MMOI mIM TEAR TOTAL MOJ-1001 TENT TOTAL COMPIF]E Gff_n&JSUTMMERF 4NCAEASEf PACIP( I MAW Br%+R&Wurt Reltl Cl Nam Sqm m.m 50,000 Nem Nam ].W.Ve R W Stl.a ftadlll SMSm 5,I00,0011 6100,00, ] WSWHe ReWT Pl 100,000 IMm Imm 1 O.7v W.".SWWA ll tlB .1]5111 1,MLm S;m lmm Imm M,m I.150.0o, I.1Mm l NmtI WIPeM1.OrmpelMryebMeW S]) ].]N.m ISO= I,500.003 Imm 3.1110000 ]M,m 3XOm 6 I.Mam Sam m.m 500 I.mm Iam.m I MDsNW1n.MeW W H..q ,3-31101 - AmSWo Sf.m Ib.m ],OMm 2m.m I]O,m 5,210.003 521om S MawTSW.ln, Y WP H,.3 W3(]) ],]bm ]]O.m ;mm I,mNO 1Mm ].IMm ]1Mm 9 LOe ANm]w&anti PNtl HI S.mm 5.mm l,m,m ILA MepXLeR"S .Wemh Tle4]SYTIII) ].]DOOM m,m l.mm Nam -;mm Imm 11.SMIYbe P-15lelYnR;.1T11-1111•Il]I%1 1.]]8.m 1.]]Sm IOm tOm I0m SUBTOTAL GIP.WPROWUENrSNICPEASE CM ]B.m.m 1.SM.m Sm. 4mma ;IM000 5.1100M },iMm IS.mm 11.SM.m T.550m {EEHELRSPPOYEYEMBMFLY9LRY 1 rgYePa cYYn.S]B^ X112,m ;01200c, IMm - t04m - i00- ] ISFree.ey0A0s "?— I;m 13,0001 Mm IQm 30m M.m ] Pebc PMllmlLnlNmYa&LWIIt 561 as No So OR, IS,m - 15,000 15m 1 PMnp 6Mlbn 5npe S,].]I (14%) 550m 5.m SAm SAm 1Mm 150,No WOOD Wm S.MHnMew%plgq Imm 1Mm 1Mm 1Mm IMm IWAW Wm MO.m 1,000.003 SUBTOTAL CAP.0.PROYESIENr&AELMSIRY ]1151M ;m.MO 510.m IBI.m 169.m ]M.m 1M,m 1185.m mm r5B5.m ^ RATIONPROIECTO 1 HbdS65Rtl Tne%Pudl PeluE•IS)5%111) mm mm mm 2 MWp -Tnti a--Rtl -SJSR 111 ].105m OM.m 1M,m 1.SM,m mm 2m.m 2. ] 6eHBe TBN6Re ,]TIP 55m ]S.m ]O.m UT NO Mm Sam BUD TOTAL NEI dllUTAOOM PROACTS Imm f110.m 110m I."O.m GMIID Iota WRAL MPPOVEYENM S1,HTM0 I.IM,NO OWSm S.eN.m ].tb.m ;100.m 1]M.m M,1]S.m lfmm b,)SS,m • pMINA1Mtle05FD%Etl Nall I.YASIERPU DFACR MSMERNRYMURWMTRWTIM ^CMEnrAp wp~g ] MASTERPUNNED FACWHES PRESENTLY IMDER OESIGN —penle]II.YeE OFONY G]DLa ] WSTE""MEDFACSNITS SCHEOUIED FOR FUTURE DEWHORCONSTMICTION ^—SYlgbnlnWeemerl EP WTRANS ( CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE WSTERPWI DESIGN S COMST11C10H LAFCO Application - Page 36 County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of DlelTlat Collection SFalom PM12ahs. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C a E F a N 1 J l L TOFAL COST MOR)MueS BUDGET EST REO EST REa EST REO EST Ka FIVE Esre YFARB EEN 0000 COST TO PRDE4T TOa'DO PIACI1SES Well Im" IMBJ000 01 2001AJ Mat TOTAL NN-]00) YEM TOTN LOLPIETE 1.WC M,MN7 Ti 1160.eTJ(Ml-(1) elo,m eW,000 A.Om 20.000 2a000 ' pue-Twa CA➢.IMPROOElENt61ACREASE W. et0.ro0 eBB.m0 20.o1B A,000 o0,Om CAPIM 1.Ibrgon 04 a peHVAeeLg5-41•(41xl MAN m.M Ieam 20000 IN000 Im.® L Renal dl-ft Pnp6 ."I.1— e91000 "AOo M000 we000 T0.001 MoM eta® 0.Panp 9e90A1OPvenna 24FI ftexl 1,11e400 lam 188.000 1ee.000 M.00) IRS= 1.1011300 UWWQ 4,WiceJ. Prtfeee 1e0.000 - 123.030 MAIN "A00 35.000 maul MA00 Im.000 0 o= s TOTHCM.aPRDl41ma1T618VHI1TY 2.1e1.MO ee.Am ele,om tM.aw M .= m we ",ow LUI A00 IOI= 2,FOl.o00 REI LITAlId11T1aF_CTB I.BIO Cx Tn Rd a.0 R) J--� Sam 000.000 1.000.000 e0A00 XWO.000 100aax LBMLPem Flm* aR000 Woo - I TOTAL RF1Va0DAT10Tf%tOSCTS e0.000 000.Om I,000ON e0,000 Lwo On MOD, Le00Am GRAIaITOT41WIT&3434t0YE11EM8 eM.000 eM,Om 1.09IA00 1�000 >60m 1M1,000 e0e.a]0 e.OJe.® PeM1NTaM00 aY tlCW Ne.a 1.WSTFAFVJINE➢FA TIES PREOENRYIIIDEX CORBTRUCrm -PeNay BOr1N Oy OTn tlN411 L IkuStERPIAHIED FACINIES 5C1E0UtED FOR NRBtE DESIGN OR COHHIRLILTON —CON Fot0aM tlua0wgl tlR'aNagvl BM LAFCO Applica6Dn -Page 37 County Sanitation District No. 6 Schedule of Dhtdc]Collec8on System ProJeeb CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A e C O E F 0 N 1 J k L TOTAL COST MCRYF.NS IftO ESTREO I ESTREO ESTREO Err iNE FST3TEARS TER COSTTI PpO1ECf TO 2020 PORpUSEB im-m 10 " Ie9a }00001 MO142 YEA TOTK NW.MOT YEM TOTAL CO MT I.WC Af!,GnNry Tv Ra .6]).3le0%1'111 ;e1e.000 ;a9e.000 W.000 e0.000 ep.Opp }:feLM�RebL 8Ws6lbN1en 61�ellm ;.M1,000 akl.Okl I.tlIO.Om I,1m.Om >41.® 3.013m a.OhbperM F�VeIrn 1.225.Om - }e.000 W0.000 I.mO.Om LYtl.00a }.OnadM Tnve Psmelm I.e00.OW IOO,am 1.m0.000 100.Om 1."Wo I,e00,Wp e.Co"Aw.P.S.P dl`U(S%)-R) 1/.000 I.L00 7 A00 a;GGG )2p00 t;eao ; TOTAL .IMWIOVEIIEN)61MCIEASECM. e.e}0.000 }.m.Om FI.SW 1.Oe1.000 1.FIS,OOD ILOf.000 1.®.Om e.M.Om !.q}S00 1.Nepwl Ehd.}PfN Ma g "115eA) }n.000 M.GW 211.000 21.000 2N.® 21e.0M) ].Ntltm AwlLtllar4 @MOa.s.611m I.mm a;® 110.O00 910.W0 I== 1,O = a.YAfeipd HOS hu CmL Ilea 100.000 I00000 I== }.eC.mlelean Vmbal }S m }l.Om M.mG 2e.000 ;1,000 M.Om 1D.m0 1tD.000 Eq® e.P t;nw,bpmanau.2at--0%) mzo 11a0 2e.000 ]e.000 M.000 el.mG MXQ m= S TOTAJ W.IkPROVFLEMSF03U9NTY 1.eM.NG am 202.000 I.DA.000 IM033 10e.000 21O00 I.m 033 mm0 I.M1,000 (WNI)TOTALCAPRALIIBROYTYF)RS 10.71e.200 I ]M2.)00 17R.eW 2090.000 1.0H,000 I.]II,000 1,1}2.000 ).ere.em ffi.Oeo 1,LW.em Pfff* tleee]OleNkae PA9Ap wm by DIM Ib.T I.YI3)EI}AAJe®iALklllEB PRESFNILYIee>ER CbB11kCRON Pwe0y0Atle00)Obs 010Lte 2.WSTERYIA20urD F=iIIIES FRESEMLY IIDER DESIGN 2.104ITER-PIM2FD FACIIInES S�OOLFO FOR FUME OE2iGN OR CONeTR11Cn011 LAFCO Application-Page 38 County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of District Collection System Pro]" CAPITAL rMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B D 0 E F O H I J It L TOTAL COB) PIaOR mute succIn Enna ESTna Enna EST REO FIVE ms YFIWS TEN COST TC PROTECT TOOIOW PIIRp s IIIWA! tY%ee IM200a xaW01 2001O2 YFIATOT& MO 2007 YFAR TOTAL cawP T Gna _ 1.Oe PeefA TVARgemr 7-1701I Wom a).® 00'QM Mem INACO )N,OW TN,aD ]TueOn AY Be4 Ftl10n pl e.7W.W0 150.000 2,000,000 3.000.000 Mam IWAW 4750A00 1)50.000 ].IIvO Two Re0h¢nml p) 2.050000 W.OW I.IOOAW I1000.000 2AWAGO tW.W0 zSMWG 4. p1lnAeew Me Jlrc(>f swcom W0.000 300.000 e.000.000 1300.O110 l Rea Hl Wer vwps ()) 1.100.OW I.IO = twom a.tmm0)HVHe sew.RegremOF, ).n.tR A 6.41e.O00 1454.O01) eW.000 1000m 2.550011) 1,000.O00 1050.000 ).Sr—JV T-W ReP'empd T]I aW.UW aWAW 610,W0 B Ca0efe A✓♦PS Pse FO l .).nffM) M 1.10l,OW n.WO IQAW t,m,m - 1.7711.00) /.x)a,WO O.Ngrewr .b Men aI P S.).).i TO%)•(TJ en,WO ]H.OW SMAW IWW0 iWAW TW.WO 10.Htln 6.Puep SICJm FIan%m.T.nx lTa%1'fA TIa.WO TrlW 61biOTALCAP.11PpOl'ExmR8111CTEA8E DAP. ]!.]a10W x.Nl.WO p9J.000 I.W.OW a.{N.eW 2.450.000 1tW.W0 1101.0W 11W.OW ]1aIxAW TeDa I.Pury 9vils h�Onrema4,]T 1]]%I�T I.31e.300 ES.LP6mTaOt I9Ne:bGn P)d.Ie%�PanmOnV:eEdl1.E)R-1T4lMi Ept1I ABHtI' x.xM.WO 11W xW.OW Nl.OW IW.000 I.aWn425m )lW O a0,W0 W.OW W.000 am AGO n0I.A.a0Wm0 000 tW 1.]N6WWl...WCWWO0 }b.OW aT].am )IxAW NS.OW W.Ws I.e1a.W0 xW.aW 1III.OW R npIptO ms 1.6uiNnrusilieee ReOebj-21 ()0%)-R) MIAW 1.0W TO.000 161.000 W.OW E1A00 ]OeAW 24eMe0e Repardletaleewen Hl 5.wsaD IW.OW 1.n0.000 I='m 1'200,000 12W.OW e,=,= TOC,OW e.e am SISTOTALRBNWITATCIIH JECTB 1YOam I.OW IW,OW I.MOM 1.]M.O00 I.== ="I amocal mom e.Wema OIINf1 TOTAL CAPHALpmROIEYFlITO TSNa,10D 1IN.xW 1}NAW SAa.OW a.W1.OW I.N6W0 a.330400 f1.INAW e.100.OW MUsAM Lm • Peter, b'cen W 11 I.MAHTBIilAWgO FApllllEa PRElEIRLY IfOFACONSTRUCROH �PPUery 1vtlMEy ptaef Hp.1 2 .IMSTFAPlAIO®FACn1IlE9 RESFMLYM9ER OE9li1 P.U." maWpe. f.MA.SIEAF119D FOR FUTURE UAWER IDFOPFIRNE OFAIGH 011CCMBTR11D0011 —•Pslleel lm0ve 4OPb pee1N e.COME1rRATED FOR MLetE YASTER.R/J1OElIti10 C016TR000ON )C G LAFCO Application -Page 39 e ' County Sanitation District No. 11 schedule at District Collection system Plojem. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A S C 0 E F 0 N 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YFARS BuDwr EST RED EST RED EST no EST RED FIE ESTSYFARS TEN C05TTO PROJECT TOM PURCNtSES INT 08 1008-00 1Y 2008 2000-01 =142 YFM TOTAL TOM 29117 YFAR TOTAL wMPLETI CMTAW6imo1 L M •NCRE E[ ^ Q 1.51eI.Aw."$1.O Repl.,WIT'1111-I620%1 8.821.000 8.W.000 70.0013 min) 70.008 1.0tl5 A8L sews Rep% .t1-II-]IN 2100.000 51.m 1".030 800.000 ].WO.OW 50.000 2,681AW 2NlAW ].held A�a.Read(l) 1'700.000 1.700001) I.TOOWO I.wowwtlplRm 3,150.006 - IW.aa6 3.000.000 3.160,666 3.150.000 s.svin5pYg6w Regaens�l(!1 e06.000 6o0.m0 600000 e.wn,ner Are Sms Pe0e11O 1,6W.OW 1.6W,OW 1,600.W0 sUB-TGTAL CAP.IMPROWMENTWNCr1E GP. 16ADO.OW 6A6l.ow ]Of.000 6m.000 2000.600 3m.a00 a.600.000 6.aca. mo 1aa0000 0,94I O CAPITAL IMPROVEMENHIMMAINIIN 1.11pn6pim BeSq PrtAw ILn0.11.18 t>/ 322000 I6.000 250,O1) 815.000 MAW 1.PMro 6IMLn hgOmmwY,]S N%1'1O - 150.100 ]]W 54.000 51.000 In.= 121.000 MAW 19AW 0.MIea0ele0uepr-f M WON) 150.000 W.000 50.000 W.000 WAW Bso.WO 151A00 800AW SURTOTALCAP.IUPROVETETRBMHIADLNY I.203.300 ].]W 27O1100 WOOD 1I8.000 Ill." 50.000 1,03o.000 ]50000 I.1W.000 GRAND TOTAL OANTAL ILd110VFAlENTS 17.651.W0 6.1181,00 4511100 651.0W ;1T8.O00 3I1.000 ]ASU.WU 1.635.0W 1A50000 I8I85.000 • p~,WebMMMN0.] —PWNY 8m8e00TONer pllhkll 1.NASTERFVNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY E6KW 2 LUSTER PLMNEO FACIIIIlEB BOHEDULEO FOR FOR FUT FUIIIRE OE810NOIT CONBiR11CIlON LAFCO AppllCation-Page 40 County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of OIs1Aef Collectlon System Pmjsctl,� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F D M 1 ] K L T WA PgKIRYFARB MID017 EST RED ESTRED coma EST MIT FIVE EBT6YEAI18 TEN [2. PRDECT mm pull Ma in?" 199699 IOBGm00 ]00ee1 moth YEMTOTK m0]11MT YE ITOTK CAPITK IMPgO I1,TMHCNE9F CAPACITY I.ImPmwsnbnN m M� Is P.8..T.T.I R]IL1911 1'l0.DI0 IN.WD 1.6"Im m0.000 I.en000 I.Bn.000 ].MWn Sb. Mnm W.Epen .IT2(7214-14 000.000 fiUBTOTK CAP.NPgOVE1rtNIB1NtliEA89 CAP. 1BT000 1.6Te.000 ]60,000 - 1.Pn.B00 I.Of6.Om 1.YNm9nevu PPFee. ]50,000 npm n.m6 mlg0 nA00 Seem Imooe Im.000 sue'ToM W.omgavElmrtsmelAmlTr n6.aao "one I m.6m m.em m.mo m.mo Im,one ITT= nUA00 mume TmK CAATK ssrmE]ertq 1.Sm.000 195,000 1.1N.am 1Te.mB mA00 a.® mean 11BOpm ImA00 2.I76A00 xWRW0 • P.elee/B.tle6e1As6tl NxT �iNwe mna6usen nelrmID.PAB.ryeMNMO) 1.MA IEtIF1AN1EFACelIlEBPNEEENN MAOE&ON ].4A61ERPI/eeiED fACILItIE86CHEOIRFAFCR FOq FIROgE OEBXW d1 COtmgKICnM LAFCO Application-Page 41 e a IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Transfer of All Service Responsibilities (Government Code Section $75001 All CSDOC service responsibilities will transfer to the new District, effective July 1, 1998. To prepare for this consolidation date, CSDOC will develop a single District budget and plan of operation as appropriate. Since CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion under the terms of the existing joint operation agreement, no obstacles are anticipated. Transfer of Assets. Liabilities. Contracts and Litigation (Government Code Section 57502) Assets: CSDOC assets will be transferred to the new District. Consolidation would result in all fixed assets of predecessor districts to be transferred at book value, less accumulated depreciation, to the new consolidated District. The current net valuation of these assets is $825,300,000 (as of June 30, 1997). In addition, all other assets jointly held in the form of cash, bank deposits, investments, notes and accounts receivable will be transferred to the new District. Liabilities: The new District will acquire all legal obligations and responsibility for all short-term and long-term liabilities of CSDOC. The District will assume payment of debt service on the outstanding Certificates of Participation (COPs) and outstanding G.O. bonds. The consolidated District will assume CSDOC's obligations to fund any previously allowed benefits to retired employees of CSDOC. Contracts: The District will assume all existing agreements, memoranda or other written understandings entered between CSDOC and other parties. iti Y : The District will assume the position of the existing Districts in all existing legal suits pending against or initiated by CSDOC. All costs and expenses, including any judgment against CSDOC will be borne by the new District. Formation Of Special Zones And Improvement Districts (Government Code Section 575021 Prior to the effective date of consolidation (July 1, 1998), CSDOC shall define the boundaries of each special zone consistent with the intent to form a special zone for the territory encompassed by the service area of each predecessor district. In addition, CSDOC may define the boundaries for each former CSDOC COP zone to facilitate the formation of an Improvement District to service the outstanding COP debt upon consolidation into a single District. LAFCO Application-Page 42 a CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Implementation Guidelines Resolutions will be prepared by CSDOC, for the approval by the consolidated District Board of Directors, for the new District to establish special zones and improvement districts, and setting Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for each special zone. Transition Period It is anticipated that all transfers of responsibilities, obligations, and assets will encounter no obstacles, as the consolidation of the nine (9) districts into one County Sanitation District essentially formalizes the existing joint operating policies, methods, and practices. Accordingly, the transition period will consist of handling administrative and accounting changes, but will not involve organizational restructuring, interagency fund transfers, sale of assets, boundary changes, or any other matter that would materially affect LAFCO's ability to order consolidation without an election (Government Code Section 57801). LAFCO Application-Page 43 !r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 1 OF YEAR Workplan & "�� "� Performance Report FY 96/97 Z End of Year Workplan & Performance Report Fiscal Year 1996197 .c PONQ�gISICTS ppO9q - z a i � o 0 o a C`7 r m .e Table of Conterta ExecutiveSummary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section 1 - FY 1996197 Budgetary Performance Objectives Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section 2 - FY 1996197 Worlplan Critical Goals Summary 25 e Executive Summary The following report provides a summary of many of the major accomplishments of the e Districts' departments and divisions during fiscal year 1996/97. These efforts have been previously detailed in quarterly Financial and Operational Reports and provided to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources (FAHR) Committee and the Joint Boards during the course of fiscal year 1996/97. The report is divided into two sections: Section 1 details the accomplishments of the various divisions relative to their fiscal ^" year budgetary performance objectives. As part of our Districts re-engineering efforts, operational, financial and project-related performance objectives were included in the FY 1996/97 budget document. Although these performance objectives do not r represent the totality of information maintained by each division nor all of the services provided, they do represent some of the major work elements tracked and reflect many of the significant core-business functions performed by the division in question. Section 2 summarizes the accomplishments relative to the Districts FY 1996/97 Critical r Goals. These represent those additional efforts, largely beyond the day-to-day core business functions, that are designed to improve the efficiency, effectiveness and quality of Districts' services. These Critical Goals are categorized into seven distinct areas: • Competitiveness and Re-Organization • Monitoring and Compliance • Strategic Plan • Safety • Customer Service and Communications • Employee Support and Training .. Management Performance This section summarizes the data detailed in a 170 page internal Workplan Manual d identify milestones and objectives designed to accomplish the various Critical Goals listed above. i Section 1 _ FY 1996/97 Budgetary Peformance Objectives Summary I v i - i i _i i �i .d u - FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Executive Management(Div. 2150) rd Executive Management tracked four budgetary Performance Objectives: Treatment Cost in Dollars per Million Gallons Flow($/MG), Completion of Workplan Critical Goals, Completion of Budgetary Performance Objectives, and Ensuring Agenda Item Approval Upon Initial Submission. As shown in the table below,we have generally achieved our performance objectives. Cost per MG is$26/MG below projections. This is predominantly due to flows being 1.8%higher than projected with expenditures at approximately 97%of budget for the fiscal year. The Districts had 47 major critical goal items(objectives) to complete during the fiscal year as identified in the FY 96197 Workplan. Significant progress was made `^ on forty-one(41)of the items which met or exceeded our expectafions for the objectives in question. Six items, however, had opportunities for further progress. Nevertheless, given the unanticipated impact of the Investigation on the Districts, such achievement is believed to be noteworthy. Many of the budgetary ,y Performance Objectives for each division and department, described in the subsequent pages,were achieved. Although some were missed,we exceeded our performance objective in this area. During the course of the year, it became clear the second quarter Investigation had an impact on Districts'shorter- term operations. Data further indicate that missed performance objectives were especially prevalent in maintenance types of services where field-work performance Is measured. Finally, it was the Executive Management Division's objective to ensure Agenda Items are completed such that items are approved by sub-committees and the Boards upon initial staff submission. Ninety-seven (97%) percent of items '-' submitted were passed over the course of the year with limited or no revision: only 3%were rejected or continued. .e OWN ;.,. ,�`-i,. � WormanceiObrjeetlyre � � . 19j38_97Tirget � ,ry „;�j;'t12 Month'P�erformance, ; d, Treatment Cost, Dollars per $556 $530 Million Gallons ($/MG) Achieve 1996-97 Workplan 90%complete 87% criflcal goals Achieve 1996-97 Budgetary 80% of the time 82% Performance Objectives for all departments and divisions Ensure Boards and Committees 80%of the time 97% ,y approve agenda item upon initial submission Section 1 - Page 1 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Operations & Maintenance Administration (Div. 3410) m+ Operations&Maintenance Administration has four Performance Objectives that include: Reduction of Dry Tons of Ferric Chloride, Number of Compliance Violations, Cost of Biosolids Disposal,and Reduction in O&M Administrative Staffing Levels. Operations Administration staff worked diligently during the first half ,r year to identify, prioritize and implement process optimization measures and cost reduction goals. Reduced ferric chloride consumption is one of the targeted performance objectives. Historically, the plants have used between 8,000 to 8,300 dry tons annually. The FY 96/97 annual target is 7,900 tons, with 7,942 tons consumed in Fiscal Year 1996/97. Although this consumption is 0.5%above our annual target,without the implementation of chemical pacing optimization over 8,100 tons would have been used. No air or effluent violations occurred meeting the performance objective. Process optimization measures implemented in digestion and dewatering, in conjunction with increased Advanced Primary Treatment, ,-, reduced the quantities of solids in secondary treatment This, in conjunction with the lower unit costs negotiated for both biosolids and residuals disposal, reduced our disposal costs. Our annual cost benchmark is$4.9 million; as shown we ended the year at$4.32 million—88%of our target and close to a $600,000 savings. Operations&Maintenance Administration staffing is below our annual target. We expected a decrease to 22 full-time equivalent(FTE)positions by years'end. Through re-engineering, however,we have experienced a drop in staffing levels to 20 FTEs. rr s z 'WF cn ._.,'re .s �Pertoretance ObJective� �1996'-9iffiarget.�Rk�� .�'T`1TIVIonth Perfondance'^,C iff Dry tons of Ferric Chloride Used 7,900(100%) 7,942 (100.5%) Number of Compliance 0 0 r Violations Disposal Costs for Biosolids $4.90(100%) $4.32 (86%) (millions$) FTE's-O&M Administrative 22 20 Staff Section 1 - Page 2 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Plant No. 1 Operations (Div. 3430) ,m Plant No. 1 Operations has four active budgetary Performance Objectives: Percentage of Total Suspended Solids(TSS)Removed from Primary Treatment, Percentage of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (600) Removed from Primary Treatment, Overtime as a Proportion of Time-off and total FTE count at the plant. As shown in the table below,while BOD removal exceeded projected levels, TSS remained below ' the 77% removal target The major factor impacting Total Suspended Solids Removal was an increase in average plant influent flow at plant No. 1 by approximately 10 MGD compared to last year. This, in conjunction with construction (temporary process area shutdowns resulting from plant expansion)and higher solids loading on the East side of the plant due to solids recycling, has contributed to the less than 77%TSS removal rate in primary treatment Overtime is slightly below the target of 25%for the fiscal year. The benchmark indicates that for every 4 hours of leave, 1 hour(25%)of overtime is required for coverage—we were able to improve upon this benchmark. Achieving the overtime benchmark is the result of implementing the new 616 work schedule in May 1997 as well as staffs extra efforts to provide coverage during scheduled/unscheduled absences. This is especially noteworthy as our full-time equivalent staffing is less than what was projected for years end. d ?P,�e-"L�i-oii'n'oeey'? b ectl' eri 'f89 9Targrs'.,7 1211Ao` eth Perfo�nceL '�_v %Total Suspended Solids >77% 75% (TSS)removed from Primary Treatment Process %Total Biochemical Oxygen >46% 51% Demand(BOD)removed from °d Primary Treatment Process Overtime as a%of total leave 25% 23.3% time taken Full-time Equivalent Plant 44 37 Operations Staffing Section 1 - Page 3 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Plant No. 2 Operations (Div. 3440) Plant No.2 Operations has four active budgetary Performance Objectives: Percentage of Total Suspended Solids(TSS)Removed from Primary Treatment, Percentage of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)Removed from Primary Treatment, Overtime as a Proportion of Time-off and total FTE count at the plant. As shown in the table below,while BOD removal exceeded projected levels,TSS remained below the 74%removal target. The major factor impacting Total Suspended Solids Removal was the construction associated with rehabilitation of the basins(Capital Project 13248). This construction resulted in further reliance on remaining in-service basins for removal thereby slightly reducing overall removal efficiency due to reduced primary treatment rapacity. This construction largely contributed to the less than 74%TSS removal rate in the primary treatment process. Overtime is well above the target of 12%for the fiscal year, resulting in more overtime than projected this fiscal year for both the plants.The benchmark indicates that for every 5 hours of leave, 1 hour(20%)of overtime is required for coverage; this is opposed to the estimate of 1 hour of coverage for every 8 hours leave(12%). The reason for this increase is the rather large reduction in Plant No.2 Operations staff during the past year—from 56 to 43 personnel. The staff reductions were a combined factor of refirements, transfers, voluntary and involuntary terminations combined with a commitment to largely freeze new hires. Overtime is utilized to ensure minimum staffing levels are maintained. It should be noted, however, that although this benchmark was not achieved, the total net reduction in actual overtime hours worked compared to last year shows a reduction of 42.5%. '� Pe A F a en e�Ob ejc`tlw `3 996Z. a _ "sf'h°+12 Marth'`Pev' fo mance ° %Total Suspended Solids >74% 71% r (TSS) removed from Primary Treatment Process %Total Biochemical Oxygen >42% 45% rd Demand (BOD) removed from Primary Treatment Process Overtime as a%of total leave 12% 20% time taken Full-time Equivalent Plant 56 43 ,r Operations Staffing Section 1 - Page 4 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Instrumentation Maintenance (Div. 3470) The Instrumentation Maintenance Division has four active Performance Objectives: Preventive Maintenance to Corrective Maintenance(PM/CM)Ratios, Proportion of Wrench Turning Time,Variable -- Frequency Drive(VFD)Evaluation Program, and Equipment Records Detailing in the Computerized Maintenance Management System(CMMS). The Instrumentation Division implemented a time card system internal to CMMS during the first quarter. This allows us to track and report upon preventive, predictive, and corrective data in man-hours as opposed to number of work orders completed. Based on this new data collection method, the table shows a 52%to 48%PM/CM ratio-this is short of the anticipated goal. Many of the hours which would have been focused on preventive maintenance were directed to cross-training with the Plant Automation Group. Business and work practices are being re- evaluated utilizing the new houdy data to ensure objectives are met next year. As shown in the table ,-, below,the percentage of wrench time for instrumentation technician staff has averaged 50%or approximately 5 hours per 10 hours worked. The database listing all Variable Frequency Drive(VFD) equipment in service at the Districts and pertinent data related to each unit has been compiled. This data will be utilized to budget future capital projects for end-of-useful life replacement or rehabilitation of the VFD's. Approximately 97%of the CMMS equipment records detailing regarding instrumentation has occurred. We are slightly behind schedule due to the unexpected impact of the Investigation during the fiscal year. y .se� 'WadS,Re.�'' z�i;::. PerformaneObJactive `r i„ t �',;'17898-97xTerget" ' 12 Month Performance Ensure ratio of 65-A/35% 65%/35% Ratio 52%/48% Planned/Preventive versus Corrective(Repair) Maintenance Ensure high levels of productive 47%+ 50% 'wrench"time are recorded in instrumentation services. Implement VFD Evaluation Complete 100%of Project by 100% Program end of year Update CMMS Instrumentation Complete 100%of Project by 97% r, Database end of year Section 1 - Page 5 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Electrical Maintenance (Div. 3470) .y The Electrical Maintenance Division has four active Performance Objectives: Preventive Maintenance to Corrective Maintenance(PM/CM)Ratios, Proportion of Wrench Turning Time, Equipment Records -- Detailing in the Computerized Maintenance Management System(CMMS), and development of a 12- Kilovolt Electrical Distribution Baseline Program. The Electrical Division implemented a time card system internal to CMMS dunng the first quarter. This allows us to track and report upon preventive, predictive, - and corrective data in man-hours as opposed to number of work orders completed. Based on this new data collection method, the table shows a 48%to 52%PM/CM rato—this is not reflective of the actual goal. Many hours which would have been focused on preventive and predictive maintenance were spent - detailing the electrical CMMS database; a project that will continue but conclude near the end of the fiscal year. In light of the new data, business and work practices are being evaluated to improve this ratio the ,r next fiscal year. As shown in the table below,the percentage of wrench time for electrical technician staff has averaged 47%or approximately 4.7 hours per 10 hours worked. This is on target with our annual performance objective. Ninety-five percent(95%)of the CMMS electrical database detailing has occurred which is slightly behind our anticipated goal. This project will be completed at the beginning of y the next fiscal year. The 12-Kv program is to be conducted over five years incorporating 10 facilities. - Two of the 10 facilities were completed in the 2nd and 3rd quarter resulting in full completion of this year's project rz: -k.me j- erfomtanee-ObyeetWe ' `I996-97,Tatg 1 trth Pertormano Ensure ratio of 65%/35% 65W35% Ratio 48%/52% Planned/Preventive versus Corrective(Repair) w, Maintenance - Ensure high levels of productive 47%+ 47% .wrench"time are recorded in electrical services. Update CMMS Electrical Complete 100%of Project by 95% Database end of year Implement 12-Kv Baseline 2 facilities completed 2 Program Section 1 - Page 6 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Central Generation (Div. 3490) The Central Generation Facility has four budgetary Performance Objectives: Dollars per Kilowatt Hour at Plant No. 1, Dollars per Kilowatt Hour at Plant No.2,Therms per Kilowatt Hour, and FERC Efficiency. The Central Generafion Division operated well during the fiscal year. Reportable data meets benchmark objectives. Lower costs for the production of power are attributed to the combining of O&M tasks with the Central Generation staff and the continued tuning of the CMMS database. Thermal efficiency has been reported as near the average of both plants. We are mandated to meet certain annual FERC efficiency averages; failure to do so can result in potentially severe and costly penalties. By exceeding the benchmark we are able to transport natural gas at a less expensive rate and are able to sell electricity to Southern California Edison. m �Pe�tPomanectivrsr>r, ri996.97gT rtomfance Dollars per Kilowatt Hour $.071 - $.056 ($/kWh)at Plant#1 Dollars per Kilowatt Hour $.027 $.023 e ($/kWh) at Plant#2 Thermal Efficiency 0.103 0.106 (thernslkWh) FERC Efficiency >42% 59% m m Section 1 - Page 7 w FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Environmental Sciences Laboratory (Div. 3580) -. The Environmental Sciences Laboratory is currently tracking three budgetary Performance Objectives: Develop Laboratory Productivity Enhancement Programs and Meet Milestones, Maintain Laboratory Sampling Workload Within Defined Parameters,and Implementation of a Laboratory Information m Management System(LIMS). Programs to enhance lab productivity are currently focused in identifying task processes and opportunities for improvement; developing customer defined quality standards; and implementing a process for monitoring lab quality. These have been slightly delayed by approximately one quarter(with Director approval)due to unanticipated effort required to keep the LIMS on schedule. '-' The goal of sampling is to maintain an analysis load within 10%of that projected in the budget. The lab performed close to 1% less sample analyses than was originally projected, slightly less than our benchmark but within the established range of 90%-110%of estimated samples taken. Progress on LIMS has progressed such that 90%of milestones through the fiscal year have been completed. A significant reason for missing the other milestones was an extended RFP review process that created neatly a four month delay in some areas. LIMS is scheduled to go on-line in December, 1997. PA. '5m,ti s,' "y."" 6" .r "ice-„ ertormance ObjedOve , 19e x_a�gat r �'72 Monfh P3eAorm7 Develop Laboratory Productivity 90%of the time 75% Program achieving progress milestone objectives by due date d Conduct Sampling/Testing such Complete 90%-110%of average 99% that workload remains within a month's sample workload narrow and predictable range _ Implement Laboratory 90%of the time 90% Information System achieving ,e progress milestone objectives by due date Section 1 - Page 8 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Environmental Compliance & Monitoring (Div. 3550) -, The Environmental Compliance&Monitoring Division has four Performance Objectives that are tracked. These include: Percentage of Non-Compliance Incidents Resulting from ECMD Lack of Response, Meeting Regulatory Deadlines for Submittal, Prioritize& Disseminate Regulatory Material in 2-day m Turnaround, and Review and Monitor Biosolids Processing/Handling. During the fiscal year there were no non-compliance incidents resulting from lack of communication. Al ECMD notifications occurred to -- ensure Districts'compliance. The Division met all of its regulatory deadlines including such responsibilities as monthly sewage spill reports,ocean monitoring field sampling, monthly biosolids report, etc. One-hundred percent(100%)of high priority legislative/regulatory actions were disseminated within two days. Finally, all biosolids consultation and advocacy occurred within the stipulated 5-day turnaround time. x "-Perr_erma`nce Oti.TVJeetive r z 7898 97 Ta et ^)" � 'y'f2'Mi)nth Performance ,mr._._ _ r9 j"� , m Limit non-compliant incidents Maximum 10%of identified 0% resulting from lack of ECM incidents interdepartmental communication Meet reporting deadlines 90%of the time 100% ,d achieving progress milestone objectives by due date Turnaround high priority 90%of the time 100% legislative materials review _ within 2 work days Review required biosolids 90%of the time 100% °- documentation and take any corrective action within 5 work days m r Section 1 - Page 9 r FY 96197 Year-end Performance Objectives Source Control (Div. 3590) . The Source Control Division has four budgetary Performance Objectives: Source Control Inspector Field Productivity, Enforcement Follow-up Within 30 Days, Permit Issuance/Renewal, and Development of - Automated Permit Program and Assistance Center. As shown in the table below,the overall performance d of the Source Control activities relative to the budget performance objectives is generally on target. The field inspection productivity of approximately 2.6 monitoring events per employee/day exceeds our target of 2.5 events per day. The enforcement follow-up and permit issuancetrenewal is 100%on target. Automated permit milestones indicate that 50%of the work is completed during FY 96197 This is largely `a due to the resignation of an IT programmer who was in a lead role in this project as well as re-prioritization of projects in the Info-r?m�ation Technology Division. "'`Pater ormanceTSofeetiv �1 - 7 6,97 Target _ d2 �IYlari' erfrtoYmance Conduct an average number of 2.5 per day 2.56 Daily Field Inspections Conduct non-compliance 100%of the time 100% enforcement action within 30 days Renew industrial wastewater 100% of the time 100% .. permits prior to expiration Implement automated permit 90% of the time 50% program achieving progress milestone objectives by due date e Section 1 - Page 10 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives r Design Engineering (Div. 3720) r The Design Engineering Division has three Performance Objectives:The return of Construction Submittals by Due Date, the Bid of Construction Projects based on CIP Schedule, and Meeting Design -- Project Milestones by the Targeted Due Date. The submittal group has reviewed all available information related to the shop drawing review process. Of 626 submittals, 520 were processed on-time.This performance resulted in exceeding our internal benchmark target by 3%. The submittal group has instituted new measures to further increase performance in this area and reduce the number of submittals returned to the contractor. Seven(7)Capital Outlay Revolving Fund(CORF)construction contracts were bid in the fiscal year. One was delayed, therefore 86%were bid on schedule thereby meeting our internal target. Of the seven projects,four were plant projects while three were collection system projects. Project management software, SureTrak and Primavera, has been purchased, and staff have been given —, training on the use of the software. All the active capital project schedules are loaded into the software. Thirty-nine milestones were scheduled during the year subsequent to software implementation and tracking. Seven milestones were missed because of decisions to delay projects. Five were missed due to scheduling errors, project changes and other factors. In total, 69% of the milestones were met; r however, eliminating the delays that were management decisions results in 87%of the milestones being met r PerforrrtaneC je. a �"s �w 1996 97�Taiget r" �12 Monts Peeo'm' ianee ,.�,. y .s y.1 , �._Y u: Return Submittals by identified 80%of the time 83% due dale Bid construction projects based 80%of the time 86% on established CIP schedules r Meet Design Project progress 80% of the time 69% milestone objectives by due — date G lae r Section 1 - Page 11 FY 96197 Year-end Performance Objectives Construction Management(Div. 3790) e The Construction Management Division has three budgetary Performance Objectives: Change Orders no Greater Than 5%of Original Contract,Achievement of Beneficial Occupancy, and Conduct Quality Control Inspections to Ensure Minimum Correctable Deficiencies. Our change orders are currently below target based on all change orders for plant and collections system jobs and contracts. Similarly,the beneficial occupancy figures have exceeded our benchmark expectations. Nearly 62%of the projects met beneficial occupancy within 90 days of contract completion and 38.5%met the target within 240 days. The Quality Control inspection checklist was finalized at the end of the first quarter and implemented the second quarter. Based on the quality control inspections for the entire fiscal year, 10%correctable deficiencies have been identified; this is equivalent to the 10% benchmark cited and meets our internal expectations. �Petioimaegel OtiJeeOve y#_F�1886 7Target _ 12 Month Pertonnance Target Change Order costs to 5% 4.04% be no greater than 5%of original contract amount Achieve beneficial occupancy $^ ' nWp pdrrupbp pebcn 61.5% within listed targets eMs in=d�mmpmim, 38.5% Ensure Quality Control 10%or less identified 10% Inspections minimize identified "correctable deficiencies" Section 1 - Page 12 m FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Engineering Planning (Div. 3730) The Engineering Planning division has tracked four performance objectives for FY 96/97-achieving progress milestones on the Strategic Plan, overseeing the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF)budget, responding to environmental inquiries within 5 working days, and achieving progress milestones for the Orange County Reclamation (OCR)project. The Strategic Plan is continuing to progress on schedule as milestone targets are being met. Important events include the development of additional committees(e.g. Technical Advisory Group)to improve the coordination of the project with the Executive Management Team (EMT)and the Strategic Plan team. For the first time in several years,the CORF expenditures a' exceeded budgeted estimates. Dunng most of the 1990's the CORF capital projects budget was underspent as projects were delayed due to the bankruptcy, project difficulties, etc. Fiscal year 1996/97 represents a year when aggressive project management helped ensure earmarked funds were expended. ,., Addifional monies spent over budgeted amounts has been approved by the Joint Boards. Approximately 90%of incoming environmental documents have been responded to within 5 working days of receipt. We have recently automated the tracking system to provide a more accurate tracking mechanism. Significant milestone progress has been made on the OCR project during the last quarter of FY 96/97, The final draft OCR Engineer's report has been completed, and a request for proposals was distributed for preparation of environmental documents and preliminary engineering which will be started during the first quarter of FY 97198. w Fes` la T_o manse OIJJective 198647 Target _' _= -12'Md eifoimance Complete Strategic Plan 100%of the time 100% achieving progress milestone objectives by due date Expend CORF Budget 80%+ 114% Respond within 5 working days 100% of the time -90% e, to Environmental Correspondence/I nquires Assist with Water Reclamation 90%of the time 95% Plan (OCR)achieving progress _ milestone objectives by due date Section 1 - Page 13 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives General Services Administration (Div. 2410) `- General Services Administration has four Performance Objectives measured for FY 96197:The Re- engineering of Information Technology,the Automation of the Ocean Outfall Booster Station,the Installation of NT Network Throughout the Districts, and a Market Analysis of the Collections System. With the hire of a new Information Technology Manager during FY 96/97, the re-organization of the IT Division has progressed well. Based on an operational study of the division, 79%of the recommended actions were implemented by the close of the fiscal year. Those recommendations not implemented were largely delayed until FY 97/98 due to additional time being required or, in a few instances, not implemented as they were found impractical given existing resources. The ocean outfall booster station was automated and tested during the fiscal year,thus achieving our benchmark for the project. The Windows NT conversion and installation went well. Completion of the project was slightly delayed due to .y the need to develop a detailed conversion plan for Source Control's software. Complete conversion is expected by the first quarter of fiscal year 97/98. The market analysis for collections was completed early, nearly six months ahead of schedule. This cost analysis provided excellent data for restructuring the Division in the aftermath of the Investigation. This restructuring was brought to the Boards in February of 1997. MbleW 998AF°Targe! 112 Month Performance Re-engineer IT Division based 60%+of recommendations 79% on Operational Study and implemented implement most recommendations identified J-31-2 Ocean Outfall Booster 100% complete 100% Station Automation Install an NT network throughout 100% complete 95% Districts achieving complete installation by end of fiscal year Conduct Collections System 100%Completion by 3/31/97 100% Market Analysis v+ Section 1 - Page 14 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Plant Facilities Maintenance (Div. 2450/60) w The Plant Facilities Maintenance Division is tracking six Performance Objectives: Implement a Plant- wide Zone Assignment Program for Division Staff, Ensure a Ratio of 800/o/20% Planned/Preventive Maintenance versus Corrective Maintenance(repairs)for fleet services and facility services,Track ti Wrench Time for Fleet Services Mechanics and Pump Station Mechanics,and ensure quality service as defined through customer surveys. As shown in the table below,the arealzone assignment project is completed for groundskeeping, painting,janitorial and facility maintenance. Percentage of time spent on fleet maintenance tasks during the year yielded a distribution of 72%/28% PM/CM ratio; this is close to our benchmark targets and excellent compared to other public sector fleet agencies which generally have a 50%/50%target. The planned and preventive versus corrective maintenance ratio for facility maintenance is below our original target. This is largely due to a re-classification of all re-build shop work to the ,-, corrective maintenance category. This oversight will be corrected next fiscal year. Both wrench time for Fleet Services and pump station maintenance is close to, or exceeds, our annual benchmark targets. Such wrench time is high compared to most other public sector agencies. Two customer service surveys were conducted this fiscal year in fleet maintenance and janitorial services. The response rate indicated that, overall, customers had an above average or better opinion of the services received. This result met our benchmark targets. a�'�caa4lrmr+sxs, erto""' ante -tiJective�z, ;: 898-97Target 72MontltPertormance ,..c .. .e -.., Implement Zone Assignment 100%complete 100% Program by end of Fiscal Year Ensure ratio of 80%120% 80%/20% Ratio 72%128% Planned/Preventive versus Corrective(Repair) Maintenance for Fleet Maintenance staff Ensure ratio of 80%/20% 80%/20% Ratio 54%/46% Planned/Preventive versus Corrective(Repair) Maintenance for Facility Maintenance staff m Ensure high levels of productive 70%+ 65% "wrench"fime are recorded in fleet services. Ensure high levels of productive 60%+ 75% _ 'wrench"time are recorded in pump station maintenance " Perform Quality Surveys and "above average"+rating "above average"+ rating achieve above average or better ratings Section 1 - Page 15 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives End-User Support(Div. 2420) ~a The Division has recently been reorganized to improve customer service. Previously known as Hardware Support, the new End-User Support Division is tracking four budgetary Performance Objectives:Work Order Backlog,Work Order Turnaround Time, Productive Time of Staff, and Implementation of a ,y Hardware(PC and peripheral)Inventory Database. As shown in the table below, improvements have been made in some areas while further opportunities exist in others. Our current work order backlog is larger than the benchmark target due to recent staff reductions in the division and focus on some special projects. Similarly, turnaround time,which is targeted at 90%of work orders completed in 5 calendar days or less, requires improvement Conversely, however, our work productivity is well above the benchmark standard set. High work productivity in conjunction with higher backlogs and lower turnaround time is indicative of a staffing level that is fully maximized and cost-effective,yet may be understaffed to ,. meet customer expectations. The hardware inventory maintained on CLAIMS was completed in the first quarter of the fiscal year. -s-"" r 7erforme a x .- zu�ca: rganc 9 a - 12'Month Perfomianee Minimize service request work 50%or less of one week's staff 94°% backlogs fime Ensure service request 90%of the time 59% turnaround time of 5-days or less Ensure high levels of productive 75%+ 86% 'wrench'time are recorded Produce CMMS PC Inventory 100%complete 100% wj ti a Section 1 - Page 16 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Network, Communications, Programming & Database (Div. 2430) The Division reorganized in fiscal year 96197 to improve customer service. Previously known as Software Support, the new Division is tracking three budgetary Performance Objectives: Productive Time of Staff, Windows NT Implementation Districts-wide, and Source Control Database Development. As shown in the table below,the Division is significantly exceeding its productive time benchmark. The Windows NT conversion and installation went well. Completion of the project was slightly delayed due to the need to develop a detailed conversion plan for Source Control's software. Complete conversion is expected by the first quarter of fiscal year 97/98. The source control database has recently taken a somewhat lower priority due to reorganization and goal/objective changes;this includes programming delays pending the start up of the new Laboratory Information Management System(LIM$). 'T .sss-;"ti ertorma nee Objective ;pzi<s,, 18967rTarget 2_Montlr�PeAormarrce ,. Ensure high levels of productive 75%+ 85% 'wrench"time are recorded Install a Windows NT network 100%complete 95% throughout Districts Program internal Source Control 75%of the time 50% Monitoring/Compliance software achieving progress milestone objectives by due date H O Section 1 - Page 17 FY 96197 Year-end Performance Objectives Communications Department(Div. 2190) e, The Communication Division implemented three on-going survey mechanisms to measure customer satisfaction. Our focus on customer services continues to result in"above average'ratings in three important areas within the Communications Department-visitor(tourlspeakers), photocopying services and Graphic Services. The high satisfaction ratings represent the ability to consistently meet customer service demands. Two additional categories, Districts'employee satisfaction and levels of Districts' information communicated are part of a comprehensive internal communications survey conducted at the end of the fiscal year. These results, which require significant explanation,will be presented to committee '-' and the Joint Boards in October of 1997 and are thus not included in this report. -raPertortnanee bjeetive � e;1996-9iryTarget�rr 1�L, � rfoimance" : Visitor Satisfaction Rating 75%+ 86% e Photocopying Services 75%+ 93% Satisfaction Rating °^ Graphic Services Satisfaction 75%+ 95% Rating Y y Section 1 - Page 18 w FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Finance Administration (Div. 2210) Finance Administration has three active Performance Objectives:Average Rate of Return on Investments, Development of a Risk Management Workplan,and Average Interest Rate Paid on Certificate of Participation (COP) Borrowing. As shown in the table below, objectives were met or exceeded. The average rate of return for the Districts'short and long-term investment portfolios for the fiscal year was 6.6%. This is due in part to the fixed income market which was unstable based on mixed economic indicator reports, and fears that the Federal Reserve would increase interest rates(which actually occurred in March of this calendar year). A draft Risk Management Workplan was completed and '-' presented to the Safety and Risk Management Policy Review Committee for review and comment, thus achieving our objective. The Districts'variable rate debt traded at an average interest rate lower than the benchmark which, in thls Instance, is beneficial as it reduced the Districts'borrowing costs for this year. �; a ortnance ti ee_&UP s �,+ 96'-`97`Ta et`_.. _ , , "' ) s.. .. .�:. .:.eE, r8 i O �erformanCe Maintain an average rate of 6.0% 6.6% return on investments of �+ Complete Risk Management 100%complete 100% Workplan by end of fiscal year Ensure average interest rate on 4.43% 3.3% COP borrowings does not exceed: W Section 1 - Page 19 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Accounting (Div. 2220) The Accounting Division has four budgetary Performance Objectives as identified in the table below. The distribution of monthly financial reports within 10 working days of the beginning of the month has been accomplished for 11 of the 12 months this fiscal year. July's report was not distributed until the 15th of G August because of additional work required to complete the June 30 year-end closing. The Division Is on track with the development and implementation of a Financial Information System—Payroll,Accounts Payable,Accounts Receivable and Budget modules have been Implemented. Warehousing, inventory and fixed assets are underway. Development of a comprehensive policies&procedures manual is pending the completion of all modules, thus completion was purposefully delayed. Our annualized Joint Operating expenses fall under the amount budgeted for FY 1996197. There are, however, issues In particular divisions where cost overruns have occurred. Examples include: Human Resources and the impact of the Investigation; under budgeted personnel costs in CenGen and Plant#1 Operations; Professional Services(Investigation) in the General Manager's Office; inability to charge to the CORF budget in Plant Automation; etc. Nevertheless, the year-end Districts'J.O. expenditures are under budget. v �+ .�y z h' ':1tlu'xE r. 1anncance bjeefiveFIR 99 �TU� tr �2neohuPerPomranca Issue Financial Reports within 90%of the time 92% 10 working days m Implement Financial Information 90%of the time 100% System(FIS)achieving progress milestone objectives by due date Develop Finance Policies& 90%of the time 75% Procedures Manual achieving progress milestone objectives by due date Ensure individual divisions 90%target 71% come withinlunder budget rote however that oaeall d.o.budget for me fiscal year Is at 97.05%of budget Section 1 - Page 20 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives u. Purchasing &Warehouse (Div. 2230) .� The Purchasing&Warehousing Division had five Performance Objectives: Physical Inventory Accuracy, Supplier Performance Measurement System, Disposal of Obsolete Items, Reduction of New Items to Inventory, and Improved Contract Oversight and Administration. The warehouse is still above its m minimum 96%threshold by maintaining a 97% inventory accuracy rating for the fiscal year. The supplier data was being tracked by two staff members who are now not with the Division; limited resources remain to address this data collection effort, requiring a re-thinking of priorities and elimination as one of the five objectives. The table reflects sale of all 2,761 obsolete items identified,well above our benchmark target. `s We currently have stocked twenty-eight(28) new items through mid-year which represents 30%of our annual target and indicates a significant achievement in warehouse control. Finally,we are tracking with our contracts oversight and administration, having completed Districts-wide contracts training to ensure all r, contracts are being cleared through the Division for either in-house approval or general counsel review. We have monitored approximately 80%of the non-Public Works agreements during the fiscal year. ps Flj. Y ...,g�rvN�"wi }''yf ti . ArvR P x,MSaeu"4k� nr ,,e G rloimaneeu bjec iv's' ?; ' �inBji;B7n7arget12nnan(h performances�- Physical Inventory Accuracy 96% 98% Disposal of obsolete inventory 20%of identified items 100% items Maximum number of new stock 94 items 28 items(30%) items to warehouse Review non-Public Works 75%of contracts -80% contracts to ensure compliance m Section 1 - Page 21 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives ® Human Resources (Div. 2520) .s Human Resources Administration has four active Performance Objectives% Number of Recruitment Days for Exempt Positions, Number of Recruitment Days for Non-exempt positions, ensuring a reasonable statistical distribution for the Performance Management Program and the Survey Rating for HR Services. d As shown in the table below, the number of days for exempt recruitments were very close to our targets. It has been noted over the course of the year that both exempt/non-exempt recruitment days experience some significant fluctuation compared to the targeted benchmarks. This is primarily due to the significant decline in number of new hires resulting in a single hiring event having a much larger impact on the overall averages. During the fiscal year, employees were reviewed and 58%fell within the"Meets Expectations'category. This is a good indication that the integrity of the performance management system is achieving appropriate statistical distribution. We nearly met the objective on the survey rating. ,., This represents a significant(+49%)improvement compared to last year's survey results. eefo_[mance bbJeeUve � 988� 2�,_ rAhPartomiarice—' Average number of recruitment 51 54 days to hire exempt position ,_. Average number of recruitment 36 38 days to hire non-exempt position Ensure 50%-70%of employees 60% average 58% achieve"meet expectations" ratings W Achieve"average+"rating on 2.5 score 2.42 human resources survey d Section 1 - Page 22 m FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Safety & Emergency Response (Div. 2530) The Safety and Emergency Response Division has three Performance Objectives with project completion goals: the Integrated Emergency Response Plan,the Industrial Hygiene Monitoring Program, and the Hazardous Energy Control Needs Assessment The Division also has two Performance Objectives with a, internal standards of measure: Resolve Requests for Service within 5 working days and a total Injury Frequency Rate 45% below,industry standard averages. As shown in the table below,all projects and deliverables and both internal standards were met Injury frequency rate remains below target, and as predicted is well below industry averages. This may largely be influenced by the CMS Investigation's results which reduced on-site staff during the second quarter. Nearly all service requests were resolved within five days,well exceeding our standard. This success is largely attributed to two factors. First, the Division has made customer service and customer satisfaction an internal priority which has resulted in rapid turnaround times. Secondly, this is a new performance objective and a historical baseline had not been previously established;therefore, the current target for performance may underestimate our ability to consistently deliver in a timely manner. Performance bje. a ia? 18868Y,.7Target _ %A2Month Performance Complete Phase II of Integrated 100%complete 100% Emergency Response Plan Complete Industrial Hygiene 100%complete 100% Monitoring program Complete Hazardous Energy 100%complete 100% Needs Assessment project Resolve Service Requests 75% of time 98% within 5 work days Ensure Injury Frequency Rate is 8.9 events(45%) 6.2 (-61%) 45% below industry average m r Section 1 - Page 23 FY 96/97 Year-end Performance Objectives Education & Training (Div. 2540) -" The Education&Training Division has five active Performance Objectives: Ensure Districts'Staff Receive Required Mandatory Safety Training, Develop&Implement a Cross Training Program, Develop& Implement an Automated Training Management System, Develop&Implement a Training Cost System, and collect data based on Training Class Evaluations. Of 545 employees tracked, 518(95%)received mandatory training; this exceeds our benchmark. The second objective is based on project completion and is approximately one-half complete; somewhat behind the original schedule due to extensively involving the Districts' DART Committee which has formed four task teams. Automated training management and cost systems were implemented that can distribute weekly training reports that include no shows, quarterly training histories, and expenditures by department Monthly reports are currently being requested and provided; the systems have been completely implemented. We have reviewed twelve months of training feedback surveys. Based on our survey mechanism,a 3.5 on a 5 scale—or a 70%score—is classified as an"above average rating for the overall training course. We exceeded this objective during the fiscal year, achieving an average approval rating of 81%for all training courses offered based on a database of nearly 3,400 surveys. ,,, pg �Pe'Finanive �vy18, 96-97Target% - 12 Month Performance Mandatory training provided to 90% of staff trained 95% staff .. Complete cross training 90%of the time 50% program achieving progress milestone objectives by due m date Develop automated training 100%complete 100% management system and complete by end of fiscal year Develop training cost system 100%complete 100% achieving progress milestone objectives by end of fiscal year ® Ensure"Above Average+^rating 70% or 3.5 score 81%or 4.0 score on training class evaluations m Section 1 - Page 24 6r II W W uJ wji Section 2 FY 1996/97 Workplan Critical Goals Summary �i 6i I IV)indicates that goal or objective was accomplished. (,/+)indicates that superior work was accomplished. (✓-)indicates that the objective is behind schedule, but is being addressed. (-) would indicate that no significant progress was accomplished. GOAL#1 -COMPETITIVENESS AND REORGANIZATION b ives .i1.1 Develop and Implement Competitiveness Plan Working with DART and others, the Administrative and Operations Units have prepared a strategy to reduce staffing by 17%while still investing in IT and automation. .i+1.2 Reengineer O&M organization procedures and practices DART and Task Team formed. Over 50 members of staff involved. Game plans are underway. Generally well-accepted by staff. Cross training consultant has noted remarkable level of staff understanding and support An internal study of the two support groups in O&M is currently underway. That study should be completed by Mid-October. d V1.3 Develop and implement Plant Automation Plan. Working with the Plant Automation Manager, the Plant Automation Group and DART, a strategy has been established and the COBS was successfully automated as were Headworks B and C. a' Consultation with engineering underway to maintain coordination between PAG/DART vision and future C.I.P. work. ., 11.4 Reengineer Administrative functions. Procedures, and practices. H.R.was significantly downsized in FY'95-96; Communications reorganized to include the Board Secretary's office; Finance has prepared streamlined procedures to implement with FIS; IT was significantly reorganized and Collections is on the verge of contracting out its small lines. V 1.5 Integrate computer system to link users and gain online access to data bases. The NT network has been installed which will allow end-users to access FIS data online. The Installation of Microsoft Office and the Outlook system is underway and plans have been completed for a District's Intranet system which will allow for sharing of data bases. m V1B Inventory employee skills and initiate In-sourcing program. The skills inventory has been completed. The original In-sourcing program has been identified for Collections and has been revised. All work had been completed on the feasibility study; however, the workplace investigation and subsequent loss of employees redirected the effort to contracting out small lines. J1.7 Define staffing projections for all departments*develop five-year manpower plan d+ Developed a five-year staffing plan which will result in a 17% staffing reduction in the next five years. v V 1.8 Promote regulation and legislation to improve procurement flexibility and work practices efficiency The Director of Operations& Maintenance is on State Advisory Board for operator certification. State appears ready to be flexible in interpretation of operator certification requirements so that our flexible work practices can be accommodated. State may require training which we expected and support as a matter of sensible business practice. Section 2 - Page 25 GOAL#2-MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE Obiectives ✓2.1 Restructure ocean monitoring program to reduce duplication of staff and consultant efforts Program has been reviewed and minor opportunities for improvement implemented. Note 2.2 for further details. a ✓2.2 Negotiate changes in monitoring requirements in our ocean discharge to add flexibility, target data needs and improve cost effectiveness. Proposal has been submitted to EPA by the Technical Services Department EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB)are favorable to proposal. We are inviting active input from interested public. o. ✓+2.3 Coordinate with SCCWRP to improve regional mon8odno efforts. Technical services department staff working with SCCWRP and others have set a summer of'98 cooperative program in motion. We expect national attention. ✓-2.4 Develop new information products to communicate Districts'compliance performance. The Technical Services Department, with the help of Communication developed pictorial representations of improvements around our outfall. However, major objective of producing a marine monitoring public summary document is behind schedule. The reason for this is marine staffs focus on 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3. ® GOAL#3-STRATEGIC PLAN Objectives ✓-3.1 Complete study and implement a new financial program. This project is behind schedule because of the decision to add the RAC and the PAC to the process. Strong staff support has been provided from the General Managers office. .J3.2 Complete the ocean ouffall assessment and define options for rehabilitation and enhanced capacity. 78 inch outfall assessment complete. Work underway on 120 inch outfall assessment. ✓-3.3 Complete outfall cleanino operation. Rebid of diving contract slowed this objective. Decision on how to proceed awaits 120 inch outfall assessment 78 inch outfall does not require cleaning. Timing on cleaning 120 inch outfall(if it occurs)will depend on magnitude of problem. RWQCB response, and weather. ✓+3.4 Award contract for treatment facilities master planning CDM is proceeding. Formation of Executive Management Team and senior staff steering committee(STRAP)has provided excellent focus. ✓-3.5 Initiate a water conservation study. CSDOC is working cooperatively with water agencies in a first-of-its-kind effort to combine water " and wastewater interests. We did not fully fund this effort for FY'9&97 unfit further feasibility work is completed on the OCR Project. Section 2 - Page 26 ✓+3.6 Continue reclamation efforts with OCWD. Public information, engineering, and environmental consultant team on board as of 8130197. Continued support by OCWD and CSDOC Boards. Initial cooperative funding agreement is in place. ✓+3.7 Hold quarterly Board workshops to review work progress and to provide policy guidelines. This objective was significantly increased with the addition of RAC and PAC meetings and the initiation of the OCR project. The staff has done an excellent job of preparing information and graphics support for these meetings. w GOAL#4-SAFETY ONectives ✓4.1 Develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan The IERP has been completed. Board presentations were given to OMTS and PDC in June. ✓4.2 Initiate an Industrial Hygiene Monitoring Program The contract was awarded in the 2nd quarter. Progress is being made on confined space issues. ✓4.3 Conduct Needs Assessment for Hazardous Enerpv Control Procedures. This needs assessment was completed in the 4th quarter. ✓4.4 Continue Districts-wide Safety Police Review Committee The Safety Police Review Committee has added Risk Management to their mission. This committee meets monthly and has developed a detailed work program for'97-98 which was provided to FAHR in June. ✓4.5 Provide on-line Material Safety Data Sheet database. Material Safety Data Sheets,as well as a user manual, were provided on-line as of June 30, 1997. m GOAL#5-CUSTOMER SERVICE AND COMMUNICATIONS Obiec ✓5.1 Produce high quality facilities/capabilities brochure The facilities brochure copy is ready for printing. In addition, Communications working with Technical Services, has produced six different brochures for pennittees in the Source Control program and a major new presentation board has been created for the Orange County Fair. ✓5.2 Develop communications strategies and programs to support and promote competitiveness Plan "Changing Times"was the communications vehicle established to promote change in the Districts. In addition, Special Pipelines were published which used Q&A format so that Department Heads could answer employee questions. This effort did not result in positive dialogue and will be abandoned once the Director of Engineering completes his issue. ✓+5.3 Establish outreach Programs for city officials and State legislators Orange County business Legislator's Day was very successful and will be repeated next year with a new format. One of Section 2 - Page 27 Communications'strategies was for major governmental groups to use our meeting facilities. We are now regularly hosting COG and LAFCO-Special Advisory Committee. The staff regularly participates in the Orange County Forum as well. m ✓+5.4 Implement intemal and external communications programs to support and promote strategic plannino process. The scope of this objective increased significantly with the formation of the RAC,the PAC, the Board Ad-Hoc Committee on the Strategic Plan, and the OCR Committee. ✓5.5 Evaluate effectiveness of employee communications programs by conducting mid-year Internal Communications Audits. The Communications'Director conducts regular Communications'audits. Results of the June audit are being collated and analyzed. A report to FAHR is scheduled for October 1997. The latest audit had 187 respondents, most of whom think that the Districts is a good place to work, but morale is lower. This can probably be attributed to downsizing, broadbanding, and the workplace investigation. ¢, ✓5.6 Develop business technical assistance program to maintain high oerformance in Source Control. Ongoing coordination efforts with Orange County Business Council and Permit Assistance Center. Created brochures and conducted workshops on permitting and compliance issues. m Basic"How To.."brochures available for industry. ✓+5.7 Establish community outreach to communicate District's permit and compliance performance. Continuation of 10+year effort to stay in close touch with interested community. Cetacean Society, Surf Riders and others joined us in June boat trip to outfall. Briefings at PDC and CSDOC board workshop provided materials to RWQCB staff and conducted recreational usage survey with cooperation of community. GOAL fib-EMPLOYEE SUPPORT AND TRAINING d Olbiectives ✓6.1 Implement employee recognition and wellness orogram. A new recognition program with gifts selected by the employee has been put in place. Wellness classes are conducted at noon on such subjects as stress reduction,weight loss,family financial planning, etc. The Health Fair was a great success. " ✓6.2 Improve PRIDE Program, A presentation was made to the FAHR Committee on the recommendations of an employee committee to convert to the IDEA Program. FAHR approved this recommendation at the June'97 meeting. ✓+6.3 Implement comprehensive safety training progrem to meet state and federal regulations a, The Training Division Manager and the Safety Officer worked together on this program. All employee training records are now computerized. Mandatory OSHA training is now scheduled regularly and 90%of Districts' employees are now caught up on safety training. ✓6.4 Implement Departmental Training Program All departments submitted Departmental Training Programs by the December 1996 deadline. d Section 2 - Page 28 ✓£.5 Implement Individual Training Programs for all emplovees This objective was not tracked carefully by the Training Division and we have not met the 100% goal of having all employee's IDP's completed and submitted. The deficiency seems to be primarily with the non-exempts. A major push was made in June. Currently,421 IDP's have been turned in for current FTE count of 539, ✓-6.6 Implement Retraining and Cross-Training Program. Training and Operations'staff have worked very hard on this objective; however, the scope of the work is more ambitious than originally thought Working with DART three cross-training programs are being designed for implementation in the 4th quarter of FY'97-98. ✓6.7 Publish annual training calendar for scheduled FY'97 training The training calendar is published monthly and is also on the global network. ✓6.8 Implement centralized tracking system and database The training calendar and tracking system are 100%automated. ,r /6.9 Implement Training Cost System to monitor and track costs by department and training oatenorv. This system is implemented and a quarterly report is placed on the FAHR agenda for information. GOALP-MANAGEMENTPERFORMANCE Objectives ✓7.1 Evaluate broadbanding and skill-based oay. The Broadbanding study has been completed by the consultant and extensively communicated by the Director of Human Resources. Actual implementation is subject to meet and confer. Skill- based pay recommendations have been assigned to DART. ✓+7.2 Implement a performance measurement and Productivity improvement program. The Principal Analyst completed three internal audit studies on IT, Engineering, and the Board Secretary's office. These will significantly contribute to productivity improvements. The Board has evidenced an interest in the performance measurement programs-a major success. ✓+7.3 Implement FIS System. The Finance Division has done an exerpliary job. Payroll was implemented in January and General Ledger was on-line in July. The project is on time and under budget with no significant technical flaws. ✓7.4 Initiate Performance-Based Budget. The new and improved chart of accounts which will track process related costs is the first step in this project. A white paper will be developed for the FAHR Committee in December to examine how we may wish to reformat the budget to capture this information. ✓7.5 Tie management performance to workplan performance through formal evaluation Process. The FY'97-98 workplan has been significantly improved with measurable milestones. The evaluation form for our management has been changed(and hopefully improved)and the format evaluation process is now underway. Section 2 - Page 29 ✓+7.6 Conduct efficiency studies using in-house resources As noted above, three major studies were completed by the Principal Analyst. A Collection System Study and an initial evaluation of the fleet which will result in a Fleet Reduction Program was completed by the Financial Analyst in GSA. ✓7.7 Improve C.I.P. Process and project delivery. Engineering, for the first time in several years, exceeded the budgeted expenditures of CIP. A d, clearing house is in place to direct projects to either small projects or major projects. Major staffing changes in Engineering occurred to bring skilled managers in to place. Despite staffing being somewhat short, engineering got several projects that were backlogged by bankruptcy back into active design or construction status. Partnering initiated for the first time to capture construction cost savings. Plans underway to prove CIP budgetary process to finance to reconcile needs and priority of projects sponsored/requested/managed by all departments. r H:\wP.DTAWDMIN050WNDERSOBIRANDERSOICORRESOMOALDRFf.wPO r r Section 2 - Page 30 L LI LI u u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California 4 (7141 962-2411 L L mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California L 92728-8127 L street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue L Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 L L� CSDOO 6130196 L L� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Dale Subject Water, Water Everywhere, and Not a Drop to Waste ■ Services: Conservation to be encouraged in the fear that El Nino downpours will overwhelm sewer systems. B SHELBY GRAD sewer systems, sanitation dis- Y tricts in Orange and Los Angeles TIMES STAFF WRITER counties are preparing a public People are preparing for the EI information campaign with a Nino winter by repairing roofs, seemingly contradictory mes- replacing their windshield wiper sage: When it rains, conserve blades and investing in new um- water. brellas. "I know it sounds incredibly But government officials Elsc perverse. People think of con- want you to reconsider when and serving water when we have a drought how you do your wash, clean , not when It is raining;' our dishes and even brush your said Joe Haworth of the Y lion Districts of Los Angeles teeth during the heavy storms County."But It's very important, predicted to batter Orange and we could have major prob- County. lems if we don't do this." Concerned that the predicted Officials fear that torrential A.L,.... ...aa .........�...I_ I,....I oL.__...nuv ale v ®DER-� RAIN. Offidals Dealing With Deluge toSeek Water County officials are concerned that heavy FJ Nina rain runoff , could overburden the county's sewer system.Reducing the amount of waste water flowing through the system during Comex dim rainstorms would help.Same conse"atlon tips,similar tothase employed during drought conditions: .Continued from B1 ■ Take shorter showers reins will flood streets and Invade ■ Don't leave tap rumiing_when brushing teeth and washing the sewer system through holes dishes and cracks around nearly 200.000 Avoid using washer manhole Orange County. a Make sure dishwasher is full beforeh operating This couldld overburden the two - P g massive Ilquld-waste treatment ■ Turn off automatic sprinklers plants in Huntington Beach.and sw.::sc_,wa,omrciswoc.,r� .Fountain Valley. In the worst-case scenario,sew- age backs up from the plants and (Iowa through manhole covers onto up waste water.But Tuchman said important during daylight hours, stream.The sewage system was pushed ouch an occurrence is unlikely in when the sewer system to the most Orange County. '"chose manhole heavily taxed. J the brink during the historic covers weigh 350 pounds each and Officials in Orange and Los An- are sealed,"she said. "They might geles counties are developing a caused flooding throughout west- rattle, but it is very unlikely they regional public Information cm- am Orange County. The system will fly out.,, paign to get the word out.Because usually handles 245 million gallons. In their effort to avoid problems money is tight,the agency hopes to of effluent a day—enough to BII this winter,sanitation officials plan spread the word through press Anaheim Stadium three times.But to take a page from water caner- conferences and pamphlets.Flyers on one day that January, the vation campaigns employed during might be mailed to customers with system was swamped with 550 mil- the drought years. their water bills. lion gallons. - "H we can get people to treat the Haworth said that although pub- "That was a lot," said Michelle rainy season like a drought, it will - lic Interest in the FA Nino condition Tuchman, spokeswoman for the help us tremendously," Turbines Is high, he hopes to keep the Sanitation Districts of Orange said. sanitation districts' approach sim. County. "When you have that During typical drought condi- ple. "We really have a secondary much rainwater,it fills the capac-. tions, residents are asked to take message, compared to the people try of the pipes. Here's where we shorter showers, shut off the tap dealing with flood control;'he said. have the concern" while brushing their teeth and "I don't think Igivingl too many In some Fast Coast cities, man- washing dishes, reduce clothes messages Is good So I feel if it hole covers have flown into the air washing and turn off automatic won't fit on a refrigerator magnet, because of pressure from backed- sprinklers. Conservation Is most It probably won't work." ORANGE COUN I SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Sectlon P7a9p903717 Subject O.C. Cities and Agencies Plan Cooperation on El Nino Is Weather: About 85 officials discuss preparations for Monies, Seal Beach and Hunting- toward the end of the meeting. possible torrential S$0[fr7S ID Wal(¢Of warnings. ton Beach piers and forced the "There ere little things that we all 1 g8 evacuation of more than 15,000 can do. I think we're very well meetingDANE at CityHell. "When we, people, _ prepared,but today kind of filled in IMMMSTAFFwartER share hat we're doing, the public One storm dumped four inches of the blanks." benefita" rail on central Orange County in Other cities participating In the HUNTINGTON BEACH—Rep- Huntington Beach officials said six hours, causing more than meeting Included Long Beach, Ir- reeentetives of nearly a dozen they had organized the meeting— $40 million In damage Including the vine,Garden Grove,Fountain Val- coastal cities and several county attended by about 85 public works, flooding of 1,110 homes. ley, Westminster, San Clemente rn- agencies met for four hours emergency and county officials—in "In and'83 we learned of and Loner Alamitos.The well for the Wednesday to compare notes on the wake of dire warnings regard- lessons,"Jones said,"and the mein. ou4 Jones said,bodes well for the their preparedness for what ing this year's El Nino condition. one was to be prepared early." county's future. P P This is the beginning of a weather forecasters predict could The cyclical phenomenon,charac- To that end, the gathered offs- coordinated approach to mutual be the wettest rainy season In 501 terized by a reversal of the cooling cl T heard from repreaentr o of assistance," he said, adding that -years trade winds, cause a warming of the orange County Flood Control another meeting would be held in The agreed that while the the ocean, often leading to huge DleVlc4 Orange County Sanitation about three months."[believe that y 8 increases in the amount of rain Districts and Caltrans on their the cities are well but county is well prepared, coopers- along the California coast. plans for dealing with E1 Nino. U now the prepared, onlsemenbal. In the 1982-83 season—the They also discussed ways of per- y have a forum. Were off "When it comes right down to It, worst on recent record—El Nino suading the public to prepare for to a good start." the lines that separate us are conditions brought torrential emergencies. political Imes," said Les M. Jones, storms and record surf that caused "Today was very valuable,"Da- Huntington Beach's director of. 14 deaths and $265 million In vld E.Nlederhaus,general services public works, who chaired the damage, ripped up the Santa director for Newport Beach, said `gyp V MCEnAnDATE: 09/24/97 TIME: 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1 2, 3 5 6 7 11 13 & 1 17 DSTRICT 1 �,/' S,/ JOINT BOARDS ILUTZI.............................MC DUIOAN.................. / ! IHOLMSEROI....................ANDERSON................... ✓ ID_ (PEROWSCHAFERI............FERRYMAN .................. 1FORSYTHEI.....................BIIOWN...... .................. 17 (WONT U .......................MURPHY....................... IJONESI...........................CARROLL......................-17 (POTT8)...........................BALTARELW.................. II£TIIB(INI.......................COLLINS....................... _ (SWININQ....................... ...................... (NOYES OM80N)..........DEBAY......................... ISEW.............................DOMES.......................... DISTRICT 2 IHARMANI.......................OETILOFF.... .. ......... .... IMAEFTZWEIUEAI.............ECKENRODE.................. ✓ / IOOTSOM........................,0NANUE:.................... (COONTZI........................MURPHY........................`LAG �j ISIMONOFFI.....................DUNLAP................... .... ldt IHOLMBEROI....................ANDER80N................... ✓ INAERTZWEIIERI.............ECKENRODE.................. ✓ (PETRIKIN).......................COLLINS....................... IPERAYISCHAFERI............FERRYMAN................... _ (BELLI.............................DBNES............... 1&IOADWATER)...............IEYEB......................... ISIMONOFFI.....................DUNLAP.......................# IMAULuRB......................MARBHALL................... (BROADWATERI...............LEVES.......................... ZUTO......... MC GUIGAN.................. ILUTZI.............................MCGUIGAN................... RVAIJUSV........................MINOR BRADFORD.......... _ IBANKHEADI....................NORMY......................... ICOONTM........................MURPHY....................... _ ISTEINERI........................•BPWER....................... IBANWEADI....................NORBY......................... ISCHWINOI......................Y6SAA+....................... WESAIr................. NOVEB......................... (DALY)............................ZEMEL.......................... (EVANB)..........................Rim............................. _ IPOTTSI...........................BALTARELLI.................. DISTRICTS J IWEDAAI.........................SCHWIN0..................... _ IEVANSI..........................NICE............................ 7 WAMMONDI....................WFA........................... IWALKERI........................MINER SRADFORD......... STEINERI........................MVM....................... (HOLMBERO)....................ANDERSON................... (SPIT ERI........................STEINER..... IFORSVIHEI.....................BROWN.......................... (HARMAN).......................WLWAN..................... WONESI...........................CARROLL...................... IMILLERI..........................SWAN.......................... IPETRIKINI.......................COLLINS....................... MMPSAI........................SYLVIA........................J� (DOTSON)........................DONAHUE..................... Bc B._ (SCHWIN0)......................VRIBAA......... ..............y ISIMONOW.....................DUNLAP....................... IDALVI...........................2EMEL........... ..............JLJe- IBROAD W ATERI...............LEYES IAIAULLERI......................MARSHALL................... ILLITZ)BANK ..AO)....................MCOUIDAN................... IBANKHEADI....................*FrF=........................ /J ON ISTEINANI.......................S ..................... ANDEfl8..... ................. IHARMANI.......................SULLIVAN_LWA ...................7 DAHL.............................. 8 WEMPSAI........................SYLVM........................ NODOES.......................... IDALYI............................ZEMEL....... KYIE............................... Oar._./ DISTRICTS LUDWW.......................... omaW4XA4� INOYESI ... ... ..........................DEMY......................... ✓ / / MCINTYRE....................... IOERAYI....... ............MOVES........................ OOTEN....... ..................... ISPHZERI........................MEMO...................... PETERMAN...................... 1,1(STREW........................... DISTRICTS ,,,/// NQIMAN....................... IPERRY/SWAFERI............PERRYMAN..................� WHEATLEY...................... "%i- - ?? ......................................� v ITtiOMS l........................ Efl...................... ......................................_ ITHOMSONI.....................DEMV........................ ...................................... _ ......................................_ DISTRICT 7 IPoTTSI.N ....................514LTXMELU.................. ✓ OTHERS M ON)D)....................BHFA (THO ........................... NH RY/SCH.....................PERRY......................... WOODRUFF..................... IPERRY/SCHAFBID............FEMYMAN................... AND RUS.........................._ ICOO:COON.............................MCOU Y....GAN ................. KNOPF............................._ NT21........................NEWER....................... .y� LEE................................._ ISRTZERI........................STDNER.......................J_ LINDSTROM..................... DISTRICT 11 MKON............................. SHAW............................. NI IR W INARMANI.......................DETiIOFF.................... Y 6TONE............................_ IHARMA .......................eULA ...................... ISIEINERI......................:r L, T':..................... DISTRICT IB ISIMONOFH....................DUMLAP..... /✓�^ IWEOAAI.........................8CN D10..................... ISRT2ERI........................STEINBI .................. ICOONTZI........................MURPHY............................(� IDALYI............................ZEMEL....... JL DISTRICT 14 IHAMMONDI....................BXBA...........................� IPoTTSI...........................SALTARE W.................. (COONTZI........................MURBXY....................... (SPR2ER 1........................STRIMEEWAN.......................... (MILLER)..........................SWAN.......................... \WadWmZ".ftW. BSWIRECTOF Wn IMII CaILdao.M ODJ24197 PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET Mine COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY /n BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM Please Print Please Print ILL