Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-08-27phone: (714) 962-2411 mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley. CA 92728-8127 str eet address: 10844 Blis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Member Agencies • Cit ies Anaheim Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda County of Orange Sanitary Districts Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City Water Districts Irvine Ranch COU NTY SAN ITATION DISTRI CT S OF ORANG E COUNTY, CALIFORNIA August20, 1997 NOTICE OF MEETING JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1997 -7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date. Tentatively -Scheduled Upcoming Meetings OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE RATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE WORKSHOP JOINT ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE STEERING COMMITTEE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE WORKSHOP -Wednesday, September 3, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. -Thursday, September 4, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. -Wednesday, September 10, 1997, at5:30 p.m. -Thursday, September 11 , 1997, at 5:30 p.m. -Tuesday, September 23, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. to be held at CSDOC (Tentative) -Wednesday, September 24, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. -Thursday, September 25, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954 JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Jojnt Board Meeting September September 24, 1997 October October 22, 1997 November November 19, 1997 December December 17, 1997 January January 28, 1998 February February 28, 1998 March March 25, 1998 April April 22, 1998 May May 27, 1998 June June 24, 1998 July July 29, 1998 August August26, 1998 September September 23, 1998 AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 27, 1997 -7:30 P.M . In accordance with the requi~ents of California Govemmeri Code S~ction 54954.2, this agenda h~J~i<-1 ! been po.sted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the.J~i i meetit)Q date and time ab All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for publi l inspection in the office of oard Secretary. @, ~ . ~~~ . In the event any m~r not listed on this agenda Is proposedfto be submitted to the Boards for discu and/or action, it wj · · do • compliance with Section 54 ,(b} as an emergency item, or that there ,, is ~ ne~o t!kft · · .. n Wtiis!l~eed ~·to .·· ' ~i~ Distnssubseq · ~-' posting oMhe a forth on a supple~otal a , ~"oot less 1tlan 72 hou the meeti'ng date. qi "'*: @. ... ~····.: 1. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) 4. Appointment of Chair pro tern, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 08127197 Page 2 of 7 6. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager c. Report of General Counsel 7. EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair: District 1 July 30, 1997 District 2 July 30, 1997 District 3 July 30, 1997 District 5 July 30, 1997 District 6 July 30, 1997 District 7 July 30, 1997 District 11 July 30, 1997 District 13 July 30, 1997 District 14 July 30, 1997 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving fund Joint Working Capital Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds District No. 1 District No. 2 District No. 3 District No. 5 District No. 6 District No. 7 District No. 11 District No. 13 District No. 14 Districts Nos. 3 & 11 Districts Nos. 5 & 6 Districts Nos. 6 & 7 Districts Nos. 7 & 14 TOTALS 06/11/97 $867,353.30 2,434, 124.01 195,794.42 24,032.97 253.80 76,719.29 33,118.42 2,671.68 1,323.93 3,885.38 5,088.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,327.43 1,904.83 3,856.22 3.654.453.98 06/25/97 $776,271 .71 446,441.28 517,886.00 27,919.24 9,818.18 31,687.15 293,950.90 8,255.07 6 ,195.81 10,206.57 77,066.10 239.52 1,869.92 0.00 473.56 216.49 828.58 2.209,326.08 07/09/97 $2,377,316.20 3,603,262.09 399,088.05 7,203.44 357.40 15,400.40 15,987,51 4,790.81 148.20 14,444.05 113,705.87 0.00 0.00 25,790.00 5,387.92 1,901.67 4,381.99 6.589,165.60 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM NO. 9 08127197 Page 3of7 Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: DISTRICT NO. 7 9. REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE: The Engineering Department requests approval of an agreement that provides reimbursement by District No. 7 to the County of Orange, Public Facilities and Resources Department, for the cost of adjusting approximately 12 existing District No. 7 manholes within several County of Orange streets in unincorporated areas in District 7 in conjunction with the County's "Resurfacing Program 1996-97". RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a reimbursement agreement with the County of Orange authorizing District No. 7 to deposit the sum of $2,340.00 with the County of Orange as the estimated cost for adjustment of approximately twelve District No. 7 manholes in several County of Orange streets. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 1 O. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 11 . 12. 08127197 ~ Page 4of7 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re August 27, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES -NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 30, 1997 to be filed. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re August 7, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES -NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 7, 1997 to be filed. c. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS. J-34-1 AND P2-35-5 WITH ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. FOR OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND PHASE II SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing for six items of added work. (PDC97-38) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. -2 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 with Advance Constructors, Inc. for an addition of $50,415, increasing the total contract amount to $7, 168,938. d. ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORK (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of selection of Black and Veatch for preliminary engineering and environmental work in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project. (PDC97-40) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve selection of Black and Veatch to provide Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Work for the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $449,500 as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 29, 1997. The Districts' share is $224,750 or fifty percent of the total fee of $449,500 in accordance with the Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated February 26, 1997. 08127197 Page 5of7 ALL DISTRICTS -(Continued from page 4) 12. 13. e. a. ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of a Task Order with Adler Public Affairs for public information services in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project. (PDC97-41) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve selection of Adler Public Affairs to provide public information services in support of the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $99, 796, as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 22, 1997. The Districts' share is $49,598, or fifty percent of the total fee of $99,796, in accordance with the Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated February 26, 1997. Verbal Report by Chair of Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan August 13, 1997 meeting. b. AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATETIC PLAN MINUTES-NO ACTION REQU IRED (Information only): The Chair will order the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes for the meetings held on March 25, June 18 and August 13, 1997 to be filed. 14. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1997 (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1997. 15. JOB NO. J-31-3, PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to add instrumentation and equipment to automate processes at the Plant No. 1 Headworks, and provide additional capability to monitor process information from a remote location. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2) Waive bid irregularities as to form; and 3) Authorize award of a contract for Job No. J-31-3, Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, to Systems Integrated, to add instrumentation and equipment to automate processes at the Plant No. 1 Headworks, in a total amount of $694,000. 16. JOB NO. P2-46-2, RECLAIMED WATER EXTENSION TO HEADWORKS "C" AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to extend the reclaimed water piping to Headworks "C" for improved reliability of water supply for the main sewage pumps. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 2) Authorize award of a contract for Job No. P2-46-2, Reclaimed Water Extension to Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, to Atlas Allied, Inc., extending reclaimed water piping to Headworks "C", in a total amount of $139,680. 17. DISTRICT 3 08127197 Page 6of7 CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3, IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 3: The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. to replace a portion and increase the capacity of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System in Imperial Highway between Beach and Harbor Boulevards in the City of La Habra. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2) Approve Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the plans and specifications; and 3) Authorize award of a contract to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38-3 in the total amount of $4,587,000.00. 18. DISTRICTS 7 & 14 ACCOMMODATION OF FLOWS AND TRANSFER OF CONNECTION FEES AGREEMENT BETWEEN IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD) AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 7 AND 14: The Engineering Department requests approval of an agreement that provides for the accommodation of flows from two small drainage areas in District No. 7 which are currently served by District No. 14 through IRWD. Under this agreement District No. 7 will transfer to District 14 connection fees previously collected by the City of Newport Beach on behalf of District No. 7. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve Accommodation of Flows and Transfer of Connection Fees Agreement with IRWD and Districts Nos. 7 and 14. 19. ALL DISTRICTS a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 08127197 Page 7 of 7 19. ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) a. 1. Confer with Districts' Management and General Counsel re appeals of termination of employees from investigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1), (2)). 2. Confer with Special Counsel re status of litigation, Louis Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)). 3. Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Larry and Donna Anderson v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 773598 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)). b. Reconvene in regular session c. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 20. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 21 . Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 22. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 23. Adjournments NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: T OJ>lace item~· pn the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall subrn{t items:tdt,the Board~~~C,retary no later th~g*the close of busi11f.1: 14 days . preced'ingdhe Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary sha • elude on the ageilfl<i all items submitt y DirectOJ'S. the General Manager and General C I and all formal "COmmunications. tary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-241 1t ext. 2026 H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\A.G97\A.UG97\082797.doc COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDED MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING JULY 30, 1997 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended 07/30/97 Page 2of11 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Diredors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on July 30, 1997, at 7:30 p.m., in the Distrids' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT x Pat McGuigan, Chair Thomas E. Lutz N0.1 x James M. Ferryman, Chair oro tern Arthur Perry x Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz x Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts x Todd Soitzer William G. Steiner DISTRICT x Norman Z. Eckenrode. Chair Michael L. Maertzweiler - N0.2 x Mark A. Murphy, Chair pro tern Joanne Coontz x Steve Anderson John Holmbera x John Collins James Petrikin x Barry Denes Bob Bell x Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff x Mark Leyes Bruce A. Broadwater x Pat McGuiaan Thomas E. Lutz x Chris Norby Don Bankhead -x Todd Soitzer William G. Steiner x HankWedaa Mark Schwing x Bob Zemel Tom Daly DISTRICT x Maraie L. Rice. Chair James V. Evans NO. 3 x Eva Miner-Bradford, Chair pro tern Paul F. Walker x Steve Anderson John Holmberg x Georae Brown Gwen Forsythe x Tom Carroll Marv Ann Jones Brian Donahue x Harry M. Dotson x Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff x Mark Leyes Bruce A. Broadwater A Patsv Marshall Jack Mauller x Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz x Chris Norby Don Bankhead x Todd Soitzer William G. Steiner x Dave Sullivan Tom Harman x Charles E. Sylvia Alice B. Jempsa x Bob Zemel Tom Daly DISTRICT x Jan Debay, Chair John E. Naves N0.5 x John E. Noyes, Chair pro tern Jan Debay William G. Steiner x Todd Spitzer DISTRICT x James M. Fenvman. Chair Arthur Perry NO. 6 William G. Steiner. Chair pro tern x Todd Spitzer x Jan Debay Tom W. Thomson ..... - • I( -Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended 07/30/97 Page 3of11 ACTIVE DIRECTORS DISTRICT x Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair NO. 7 Christina Shea, Chair pro tem x Jan Debay x James M. Ferryman x Pat McGuigan x Mark A. Murphy William G. Steiner DISTRICT Shirley Dettloff, Chair N0.11 x Dave Sullivan, Chair pro tern x Todd Spitzer DISTRICT x Burnie Dunlap, Chair N0.13 x Mark Schwing, Chair pro tern x Mark A. Murphy William G. Steiner x Bob Zemel DISTRICT Christina Shea, Chair N0.14 x Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair pro tern x Mark A. Murphy William G. Steiner x Peer A. Swan STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: ALTERNATE DIRECTORS Jim Potts x Barry Hammond Tom W. Thomson Arthur Perry Thomas E. Lutz Joanne Coontz x Todd Spitzer x Tom Hannan Tom Hannan William G. Steiner Marty Simonoff HankWedaa Joanne Coontz x Todd Spitzer Tom Daly x Barry Hammond Jim Potts Joanne Coontz x Todd Spitzer Darryl Miller Don F. Mcintyre, General Manager; Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations; Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager of Administration; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Nick Arhontes; Jeff Armstrong; Barbara Collins; Mark Esquer; Ingrid Hellebrand; Brian Keating; Steve Kozak; John Linder; David A. Ludwin; Mike Moore; Mike Peterman; Suzanne Smith; Gary Streed; Moira Sullivan; Mitch Trivanovich; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy Wheatley; Chuck Winsor; Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Art Perry, Alternate Director; Denis Bilodeaux; Don Jamison REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair reported that Governor Wilson had signed the Districts' consolidation bill, AB769. Staff was preparing the application to LAFCO and the Executive Committee would be meeting on September 17th to discuss the filing and the next steps to be taken. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended 07/30/97 Page 4of11 Chair Collins also referred to a fax sent to all Directors announcing that Judy Wilson has accepted a position with the Los Angeles Department of Public Works as Director of Sanitation, subject to confirmation by the city council. It was then announced that only the Planning, Design and Construction Committee would be meeting on August 7. All other committees would be dark. In addition there would be a Directors' workshop on Saturday, August 2, focusing on the Districts' ocean discharge permit. The Joint Chair directed attention to the booth set up in the back of the room, which was the set up for a 17-day run at the Orange County Fair. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, spoke briefly about the fair and introduced key staff that was in charge of the project. ADOPT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING EMPLOYEE CAii Districts): The Joint Chair requested that Resolution No. 97-30 be adopted expressing appreciation to Judith A. Wilson for her contribution and dedication to public service upon her retirement from the Districts. The resolution was then presented to Ms. Wilson. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts) There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 25, 1997, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Todd Spitzer abstained. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS CAii Districts) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A", "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below. · Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended 07/30/97 Page 5of11 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Joint Working Capital Fund Self-Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICT NO. 13 DISTRICT NO. 14 DISTRICTS NO. 5 & 6 DISTRICTS NO. 6 & 7 DISTRICTS NO. 7 & 14 5/14/97 $ 394,580.99 3,286,351.21 138,089.17 0.00 225.00 2,n2.5o 11,137.42 27.15 0.00 800.95 5,219.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $3 839 204.01 Directors Mark Leyes and Todd Spitzer abstained. DISTRICT NO. 2 05/28/97 $ 386,016.11 355,312.70 580,675.28 93,582.37 10,076.48 35,027.51 547,342.87 13,382.87 3,455.71 10,531.54 6,477.24 421.94 438.43 498.40 216.49 17.18 $2 043472 53 MISC. $50,669.43 58,364.94 17,688.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,670.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $128 392.94 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE PETITION RECEIVED FROM PHILLIP AND BARBARA JOUJON-ROCHE TO ANNEX .608 ACRES OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICTS IN THE VICINITY OF SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD AND MOHLER DRIVE IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF ANNEXATION OF SAID TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT. <PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 78 JOUJON-ROCHE ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2). MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to adopt Resolution No. 97-29-2, initiating proceedings for Annexation No. 78 -Joujon-Roche Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. DRAFT STEERING COMMITIEE MINUTES CAii Districts): Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of Steering Committee presented A verbal report, re the July 30, 1997 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held-on July 25, 1997 to be filed. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended 07/30/97 Page 6of11 DRAFT OPERATIONS. MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES CAii Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS. INC. FOR PRIVATE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DISTRICTS' OXYGEN GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2: The Operations-Maintenance Department requests consideration from the Board of Directors to amend several terms and conditions of the original agreement for an estimated cost savings of $215,000 for each year of the remaining seven (7) years of the fifteen-year contract. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Authorize the General Manager to execute an amendment to the original agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the private operation and maintenance of the Districts' oxygen generation system at Plant No. 2, approved as to form by the Districts' Contracts/Purchasing Manager. DRAFT PLANNING. DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES CAii Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft min~tes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1 WITH COUCH BROS .. INC. OBA COUCH & SONS. FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (Districts 3 and 11 ): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 6 providing thirteen items of additional work and granting a time extension of 101 calendar days for completion of the additional work. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Change Order No. 6 to Contract No. 11- 17-1 with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons for an addition of $92,305.00 and 101 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to.$6,005,724.03. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended 07/30/97 Page 7of11 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO JOB NOS. P1-41. P1-43. P1-44. P2-48. P2-50. P2-53-2. SP19950021 AND SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3. 4. AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1: SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON- STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 1: SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 1: REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS D THROUGH Q AT PLANT NO. 2: SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON-STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2: SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT -NO. 2: TUNNEL COVER REPLACEMENT AT BILLINGS TUNNEL AT PLANT NO. 2: AND SLUDGE PIPING MODIFICATION AT PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS 6-15: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 1 providing eleven items of added and deleted work and granting a time extension of 37 days for completion of the added work. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P1-41, et al. with Margate Construction, for a deduction of $85,680.00 decreasing the total contract amount to $8,375,458.00, and an addition of 37 calendar days time extension. ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE CCDM) FOR JOB NOS. J-40-1 AND J-40-2 RE PREPARATION OF PHASE 1 OF STRATEGIC PLANS CALL DISTRICTS>: The Director of Engineering requests approval of an Addendum to the PSA providing for additional work in three areas: (1) updating trunk sewer system information contained in the Districts' CASSWORKS data base, (2) development of pump station discharge curves, and (3) additional public, staff, and Board meeting support. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the PSA with COM in the amount of $199,489 for a total amount not to exceed $1,958,717. Director Mark Leyes abstained. DRAFT FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION. AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES CAii Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 30. 1997 CAii Districts) A motion was made, seconded and carried to receive and file this information-only item. · Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended 07/30/97 Page 8of11 ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER CAii Districts): After discussion among the Directors, the motion was moved, seconded and carried to refer this item back to the Finance~ Administration and Human Resources Committee for further study and consideration, to be brought back before the Joint Boards in September; and to place a moratorium on investing in reverse repurchase agreements until the Joint Boards vote to approve the final policy on reverse repurchase agreements. DECLARATION OF DISTRICTS' OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICTS' EXISTING CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE OF. AND IN ANTICIPATION OF. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES. FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE INDEBTEDNESS ISSUE CAii Districts): MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Adopt Resolution No. 97-28, declaring Districts' official intent to reimburse the Districts' existing capital reserve funds for certain expenditures made in advance of, and in anticipation of, capital improvement expenditures from proceeds of a future indebtedness issue. 1997-98 FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE UPDATE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE DISTRICTS' FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE VENDOR. JD EDWARDS. IN THE AMOUNT OF $55.384.87 CAii Districts): MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Approve the 1997-98 financial information software update and software maintenance agreement with the Districts' financial information software vendor, JD Edwards, in the amount of $55,384.87. Director Mark A. Murphy abstained. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CAii Districts): GSA staff requests approval of offering a computer financial assistance program to employees. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Approve a computer financial assistance program to employees providing for a maximum loan of $3,000; 10% down payment; 24 months repayment period; interest rate at 5%; and aggregate maximum loan fund of $150,000.00. Director Mark A. Murphy abstained. AUTHORIZE STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH R.W. BECK TO DEVELOP ASSUMPTIONS AND STRATEGIES TO IMPLEMENT A REPLACEMENT FUND FOR FIXED ASSETS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75.000 CAii Districts>: MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: That the Directors authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with R.W. Beck to develop assumptions and strategies to implement a Replacement Fund for fixed assets for an amount not to exceed $75,000. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended 07/30/97 Page 9of11 ANNUAL ELECTION OF JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair announced that this was the annual meeting at which election of the Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization is to be held. The Secretary stated that Diredor John Collins had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 25, 1997, in accordance with established procedures. There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled and the Secretary the unanimous ballot for Director John Collins as Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. ANNUAL ELECTION OF VICE JOINT CHAIR This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards of Diredors for the election of the Vice Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Joint chair then called for nominations-for the post, whereupon Director Peer A. Swan was nominated. There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Peer A. Swan as the Vice Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. DISTRICTS 7 & 14 ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1. AND ABANDONMENT OF NINE DISTRICT NO. 7 PUMP STATIONS. CONTRACT NO. 7-14 (Districts 7 & 14) : MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: The Director of Engineering requests approval of Addendum No. 4 to the PSA providing for additional work for construction contract support services during the construction of Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1. Director Todd Spitzer abstained. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended 07/30/97 Page 10of11 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS. P1-41. P1-43, P1-44. P2-48, P2-50. P2-53-2. P19950021 and SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR PAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH FACILITIES TO PERMIT DISCHARGE OF EXCESS RECLAIMED WATER TO THE DISTRICTS' OCEAN OUTFALL SYSTEM TO BE FUNDED BY DISTRICT 5 (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests approval of Change Order No. 2 for construction costs for an increased amount not to exceed ~197,299. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to execute Change Order No. 2 for Job Nos. P1-41, P1-53, P1-44, P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021 and SP19950059 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the Green Acres Project distribution system and the Districts' ocean outfall system for an amount not to exceed $197,299, to be funded by District 5; and, DISTRICT 5: Moved, seconded and carried to approve District 5 funding of Change Order No. 2 for Job No. P2-48 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the Green Acres Project distribution system and the Sanitation Districts' ocean outfall system at a cost not to exceed $197,299. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE (District Nos. 5 and 6): Receive and file Summons and Complaint for negligence, David P. Gatliff v. Wal-Con Construction Company, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 779933, in connection with Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1) Find that the matter arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); 2) Receive and file Summons and Complaint; and 3) Authorize Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54956.9 AND 54957.6 (All Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at 9:12 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(a) and 54957.6(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item No. 18(a)(5). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 9:31 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. APPROVE MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SUPERVISOR AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEE UNIT RE SALARIES. BENEFITS AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT (All Districts): Authorize the General Manager to sign the Memoranda of Understanding with the Supervisor and Professional Employee Unit re salaries, benefits and terms of employment for the period of July 4, 1997 to June 30, 1998. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended 07/30/97 Page 11 of 11 ADJOURNMENTS CAii Districts>: The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 9:32 p.m. (j of Directors of ist cts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, \\lead\data2\wp.dta\admln\BS\MIN97\073097.doc FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE 1 ,, REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158819 A & G INDUSTRIES $1,805.22 STRAINER PROBES 158820 AT & T • MEGACOM SERVICE $3,013.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158821 AT & T ·CELLULAR CR & R $1.47 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158822 AWSI $30.00 D.O.T. TRAINING PROGRAM 158823 ABRASIVE ENG. TOOLING & EQUIP. $154.24 HARDWARE 158824 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES $420.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 158825 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. $417,891.60 CONSTRUCTION J-34-1, P2-35-5 158826 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $139.25 AIRFREIGHT 158827 ALADDIN HOUSE $604.56 WINDOW BLINDS 158828 ALCO PRODUCTS INC $267.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158829 ALLOSEP $431.81 FILTERS 158830 ALPHA RESEARCH GROUP $14,430.00 ON-SITE TRAINING DEVELOPMENT 158831 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158832 AMERICAN DIGITALTECHNOLOGIES $1,200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158833 AMERICAN INST OF GRAPHIC ARTS $245.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 158834 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $257.33 PUBLICATION 158835 APCO VALVE & PRIMER CORP. $346.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES ~ 158836 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4,841.70 NOTICES & ADS 158837 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 158838 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT ...... 158839 AWARDS & TROPHIES $172.69 PLAQUES rt 158840 BAR TECH TELECOM, INC. $200.00 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION ~ 158841 BARNEBY-SUTCLIFFE CORP. $136.96 FILTERS ~ 158842 BARNES & NOBEL BOOKS $23.27 PUBLICATION 158843 BATTERY SPECIAL TIES $7,500.21 BATTERIES 158844 BLACK & VEATCH $3,221.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-46 158845 BLACK BOX CORP $4,557.87 FIBER OPTIC CONVERTER 158846 BOOT BARN $96.87 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 158847 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $11,770.12 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18 158848 ROBERT B. BRESKIN $2,232.50 PERMIT FEE REFUND 158849 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $61.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158850 CS COMPANY $712.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158851 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $1,164.49 LAB SUPPLIES 158852 CALIFORNIA AUTO REFRIGERATION $357.20 REPAIR KITS 158853 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION, INC. $1,469.01 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 158854 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $120.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158855 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $679.00 MOVING SERVICES 158856 CAMALI CORP. $1,200.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158857 CANUS CORPORATION $37,298.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 158858 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $49,486.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95 158859 SUSAN W. CASE $165.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158860 CATAPULT INC. $2,720.00 ON-SITE TRAINING 158861 MARK CASTILLO $3,038.97 EXPENSE REIMB. 158862 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $17,328.79 INSPECTION SERVICES 158863 CLEAN SOURCE $651.35 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158864 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $8,328.70 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158865 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2,007.38 PUMP PARTS 158866 COMPUTERS AMERICA $219.70 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 158867 COMPUSERVE $821.03 COMPUTER SERVICES 158868 CONDENSER & CHILLER SERVICE $1,275.00 SERVICE ANALYSIS 158869 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $116.31 TRUCK PARTS 158870 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL $8,309.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 158871 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,057.15 ENGINE PARTS 158872 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $74.60 TRUCK PARTS 158873 COUNTY CLERK $228.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 158874 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $3,065.67 ELECTRIC PARTS 158875 CHARLES P. CROWLEY, CO. $785.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 158876 DELL MARKETING L. P. $46,595.42 COMPUTERS 158877 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $380.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 158878 DIAMOND H RECOGNITION $270.15 SERVICE AWARDS 158879 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $3,596.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 158880 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $1,065.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 158881 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $105.16 PAINT SUPPLIES ~ 158882 EMA SERVICES INC $3,100.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158883 ESP INDUSTRIES, INC. $130.86 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 158884 EATON CORP/CUTLER HAMMER $3,942.71 EQUIPMENT REPAIR ...... 158885 ELECT AIR $360.11 PNEUMATIC CYLINDERS rt 158886 ENCHANTER, INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95 :r 158887 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,181.55 LAB SERVICES N 158888 JIM EVANS $2,597.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158889 FAIRBANKS SCALES INC $3,885.83 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158890 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $380.36 FRAMES 158891 FIBERTRON $198.63 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 158892 BAILEY FISCHER & PORTER CO. $267.39 FILTERS 158893 FLICKINGER CO $239.66 VALVES 158894 FLORIDA CONVEYOR & EQUIP $11,714.71 POLY-ROLLER ASSY. 158895 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $256.02 PAINT SUPPLIES 158896 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $89.47 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES 158897 GCS SERVICE, INC. $137.13 TIMER 158898 GCOE $99.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 158899 GST, INC. $14,735.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158900 GTE COMMUNICATONS (FLOOR 3) $164,342.54 PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADES 158901 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,115.21 LUMBER/HARDWARE 158902 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $5,660.92 CHEMICALS 158903 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $952.50 REPAIR SCRUBBER TOWERS 158904 . GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,175.66 , TELEPHONE SERVICES 158905 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $92.00 PUBLICATION 158906 GRASBY S.T.I. $530.48 ENGINE PARTS 158907 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO., INC. $6,751.90 ELECTRICAL PARTS 158908 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $111.54 PRINTING 158909 DGA CONSULTANTS $950.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 158910 HACH COMPANY $3,319.04 LAB SUPPLIES •) • FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158911 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $2,484.19 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158912 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $6,254.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 158913 PL HAWN CO, INC. $314.88 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158914 LINDA HOLMES $2,312.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158915 HOME DEPOT $63.46 SMALL HARDWARE 158916 HRDIRECT $123.34 LABOR LAW POSTERS 158917 RS HUGHES CO, INC. $87.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 158918 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,341.73 WATER USE 158919 IC ENGINE & EQUIP SERVICE $2,159.99 GENERATOR PARTS 158920 IPCOSAFETY $922.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 158921 ISCO, INC. $49.39 INSTRUMENT 158922 IMAGING PLUS $594.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158923 IMAGING AND RECORDS MGMNT $200.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158924 INORGANIC VENTURES $139.00 LAB SUPPLIES 158925 IAML $1,675.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158926 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $677.15 BATIERIES 158927 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $2.90 WATER USE ~ 158928 JAMISON ENGINEERING $22,642.65 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 158929 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $2.412.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158930 JAY'S CATERING $440.69 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE ...... 158931 JENSEN TOOLS, INC. $226.28 OFFICE EQUIPMENT rt" 158932 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $100.00 TRUCK REPAIRS :r 158933 JOHNSTO~E SUPPLY $301.46 ELECTRIC PARTS w 158934 TERRI JOSWAY $250.00 TRAINING EXPENSES 158935 KEENAN SUPPLY $590.21 WELDING SUPPLIES 158936 KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. $25,454.82 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 158937 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $441.21 MACHINE SUPPLIES 158938 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $897.75 TOOLS 158939 VLADIMIR KOGAN $342.58 EXPENSE REIMB. 158940 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,618.73 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 158941 LAOUG (LA ORACLE USER GROUP) $495.00 MEMBERSHIP 158942 MDT $936.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158943 MACOMCO $455.55 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158944 MANDIC MOTORS $44.00 TOWING SERVICES 158945 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $1,406,500.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2 158946 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $490,980.23 CONSTRUCTION P1-41, P1-43 158947 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $68,018.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-40-2(REBID), P2-47-2(REBID) 158948 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $82.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158949 MATI -CHLOR, INC. $201.86 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES 158950 MC INFO $10,460.67 COMPUTER HARDWARE 158951 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $120.88 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 158952 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $173.08 HEATER 158953 MELLON TRUST $15,227.10 INVESTMENT CUSTODIAN BANK 158954 MESA MUFFLER $137.75 TRUCK PARTS 158955 MICRON SPEARATION INC $58.34 LAB SUPPLIES 158956 MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING $2,732.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158957 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,744.44 UNIFORM RENTALS 158958 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $3,020.06 CONST INSP TRAILER LEASE 158959 MORTON SALT AND/OR $1,405.47 SALT 158960 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. $442.15 PUMP PARTS 158961 NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S $69.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158962 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP $451.28 TRAINING VIDEO'S 158963 NETWORK CATALYST, INC $9,417.27 COMPUTER HARDWARE 158964 NICKEY PETROLEUM CO., INC. $3,637.64 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 158965 SY NIELSON SERVICE INC $50.00 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION 158966 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $103.00 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 158967 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,954.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158968 OMNI WESTERN INC $410.85 TOOLS 158969 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $185.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158970 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,063.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158971 ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. $1,007.56 FITTINGS 158972 OXYGEN SERVICE $3,980.20 SPECIAL TY GASES 158973 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,685.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ~ 158974 COUNTY OF ORANGE $280.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 158975 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $431.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158976 PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. $2,554.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS ~· 158977 PACIFIC BELL $18.05 TELEPHONE SERVICES rt 158978 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $2,417.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES :r 158979 PASCAL & LUDWIG ENGINEERS $21,794.00 CONSTRUCTION J-33-2 ~ 158980 PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC. $63,617.20 CONSTRUCTION P1-38-2 158981 CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY $500.81 REIMB. PETTY CASH 158982 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC. $83,986.48 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 3-29-95 158983 US FILTER I POL YMETRICS INC $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 158984 POL YPURE, INC. $26,771.02 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 158985 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 158986 PRYOR RESOURCES, INC. $158.95 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158987 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $88.83 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 158988 HIPOTRONICS, INC. $59.59 FREIGHT CHARGE 158989 RJN GROUP, INC. $2,249.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158990 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $3,533.93 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 158991 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $329.34 TRASH REMOVAL 158992 RAND MATERIALS HANDLING $142.80 FREIGHT CHARGE 158993 RD SYSTEMS INC $222.03 CAMERA REPAIR 158994 REAL TIME $3,044.40 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES 158995 RED WING SHOES $151.71 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 158996 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $334.03 I VALVE 158997 REMEDY TEMP $10,297.82 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 158998 REVCO I LINDBERG $233.67 DISPLAY PANEL 158999 GEORGE ROBERTSON $834.94 EXPENSE REIMB. 159000 MARCY ROTHENBERG $1,695.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159001 RUTAN & TUCKER $10,296.00 LEGAL SERVICES 159002 SCOTT SPECIAL TY GASES, INC. $1,449.03 SPECIAL TY GASES 4j ..... FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159003 SEWER EQUIP CO OF FLORIDA $7,141.51 HOSE 159004 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,705.58 TOOLS 159005 SHURELUCK SALES $608.62 TOOLS/HARDWARE 159006 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,337.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94 159007 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $30.00 PERMIT FEES 159008 SO. CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $880.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 159009 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. $103.63 WATER USE 159010 SUCCESSORIES $520.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 159011 SUNSET FORD $189.11 TRUCK PARTS 159012 SUPELCO, INC. $1,032.89 LAB SUPPLIES 159013 SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $15,250.00 CONSTRUCTION 159014 SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $432,604.15 CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, P2-55 159015 SYMCAS, INC. $142.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 159016 TEKTRONIX, INC. $247.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159017 THERMO SEPERATION PRODUCTS $446.66 LAB SUPPLIES 159018 THERMO JARRELL ASH CORP $503.39 TRAINING PACKAGE 159019 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $10,986.32 MECHANICAL PARTS ~ 159020 TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE $330.59 LOCKS&KEYS 159021 EDWARD M. TORRES $300.55 EXPENSE REIMB. b= 159022 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $3,139.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS ..... 159023 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $722.90 TRUCK PARTS rt 159024 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $698.64 TRUCK PARTS :r 159025 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,811.00 LAB SERVICES U1 159026 JG TUCKER & SON, INC. $1,503.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159027 MICHELLE TUCHMAN $110.52 EXPENSE REIMB. 159028 TULE RANCH/MAGAN FARMS $38,620.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL 159029 DANIEL TUNNICLIFF $250.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159030 TUSTIN DODGE $45.32 TRUCK PARTS 159031 UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $656.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159032 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $110.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 159033 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,208.50 LAB SUPPLIES 159034 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,873.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159035 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $79.48 VALVE 159036 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC. $1,993.37 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 159037 VERNE'S PLUMBING $632.30 PLUMBING SERVICES 159038 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $1,672.77 FIBER OPTICS 159039 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,138.56 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 159040 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $220.00 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 159041 WAXIE $136.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159042 WEF $500.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 159043 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $22,768.99 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 159044 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $57.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159045 WESTSIDE BLDG MATERIAL CORP $340.15 TOOLS 159046 XEROX CORP. $10,148.73 COPIER LEASES 159047 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $455.96 LAB SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 $3,839,204.01 FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 SUMMARY #1 OPERFUND #20PERFUND #2 CAP FAC FUND #30PERFUND #3 CAP FAC FUND #50PERFUND #70PERFfJND #11 OPER FUND #11 CAP FAC FUND JTOPERFUND CORF JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT $225.00 $422.50 $2,350.00 $10,187.42 $950.00 $27.15 $800.95 $2,382.63 $2,836.99 $394,580.99 $3,286,351.21 $138,089.17 $3,839,204.01 PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 .. , FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159070 AGX CORPORATION $424.06 GAUGE 159071 ABRASI~ ENG. TOOLING & EQUIP. $722.52 HARDWARE 159072 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $3,235.60 I LAB SUPPLIES 159073 AIR COLD SUPPLY, INC. $99.36 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS 159074 ALLIED PACKING & RUBBER INC $652.50 GASKETS 159075 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 159076 AMERICAN CRANE INSTITUTE $825.00 CRANE & MANLIFT TRAINING 159077 AMERICAN Dl~ITAL TECHNOLOGIES $6,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159078 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $1,245.00 PUBLICATION 159079 AMER SOC FOR QUALITY CONTROL $351.50 PUBLICATIONS 159080 AMETEK $78.33 CIRCUIT BOARD REPAIR 159081 LLOYD ANDERSON $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159082 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES $1,233.39 MACHINE SUPPLIES 159083 ARMOR-VAC $1,146.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 159084 ASAP SOFlWARE EXPRESS $24,413.12 SOFlWAREUPGRADES ~ 159085 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH, INC. $260.78 FILTER 159086 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159087 CYMANTHA ATKINSON $18.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. I-'· 159088 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO .$214.42 AUTO SHOP SUPPLIES rt 159089 AVIS CONTRACTOR LICENSE SVC CE $2,085.00 EXAM PREPARATION tp 159090 BAYSHORE PSYCHOLOGY CENTER $125.00 SEMINAR FEE ..... 159091 BECWAR ENGINEERING $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159092 BELL PIPE & SUPPLY CO $502.22 VALVE PARTS 159093 BLACK BOX CORP $157.89 MODEM REPAIR 159094 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $5,259.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1 & P2-48 159095 BRENNER-FIEDLER & ASSOC., INC. 1330.32 GENERATORS 159096 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. 244.84 INSTRUMENT 159097 BUSH & ASSOCIATES, INC. $1,424.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 159098 CPI -THE ALTERNATIVE $755.32 LAB SUPPLIES 159099 CS COMPANY $1,516.35 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159100 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $203.65 LAB SUPPLIES 159101 CAL TROL, INC. $3,109.62 HARDWARE 159102 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $435.54 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159103 CALOL YMPIC GLOVE & SAFETY $3,119.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159104 CAMALI CORP. $1,300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159105 CAMP DRESSER & MC KEE INC $15,938.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 159106 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $4,403.12 OFFICE FURNITURE 159107 CENTURY PAINT $121.93 PAINT SUPPLIES 159108 CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY $50.00 PUBLICATION 159109 CLEAN SOURCE $450.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159110 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159111 COLE SCIENTIFIC, INC. $20.10 LAB SERVICES 159112 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $293.84 LAB SUPPLIES 159113 COLOR ARTS INC $1,749.75 VEHICLE DECALS 159114 COMMUNITY ACTION\ EAP $950.00 DISTRICT EAP -MAY 97 159115 COMPUTERS AMERICA $1,741.94 COMPUTER SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122197 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05128/97 POSTING DATE 05128/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159116 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $485.52 ELECTRIC PARTS 159117 CONSUMER PIPE $4,397.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159118 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $7,702.97 CONSUL TING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93 159119 DOUG COOK $140.30 EXPENSE REIMB. 159120 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $307.24 ENGINE PARTS 159121 CORPORATE EXPRESS $175.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159122 CUMMINS-ALLISON CORP $981.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 159123 CA DEPT OF HEAL TH SERVICES $3,119.00 MEMBERSHIP 159124 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $20,126.00 1ST QUARTER UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 159125 DCC/CAL INC $137.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159126 CHRISTOPHER DAHL $817.37 EXPENSE REIMB. 159127 DATA CLEAN CORP $2,910.00 EARTHQUAKE PROOFING 159128 JIM DAVIDSON $392.34 EXPENSE REIMB. 159129 TOM DAWES $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159130 DAYS INN HOTEL $545.80 HOTEL RESERVATIONS ~ 159131 DELL MARKETING L. P. $13,210.15 COMPUTERS 159132 DEL TA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $34,449.24 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94 159133 DEL TA INTERNET SERVICES, INC. $100.00 DOMAIN SET-UP FEE ..... 159134 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,583.99 OFFICE EQUIPMENT rt 159135 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $515.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES tD 159136 PIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $3,480.00 INSPECTION SERVICES ... , rv 159137 ~OBERT DUMITY $713.76 EXPENSE REIMB. 159138 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,001.25 PAINT SUPPLIES 159139 ESP INDUSTRIES, INC. $456.06 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159140 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $150.65 TRUCK PARTS 159141 J.D. EDWARDS s29,1n.3o SOFlWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7-24-96 159142 EL-COM HARDWARE $81.62 FAN 159143 ELECTRA-BOND, INC. $1,621.64 REPAIR 159144 KENNETH J EMANUELS & ASSOC $16,500.00 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATE SERVICES 159145 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $900.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 159146 ENCHANTER, INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95 159147 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,030.35 LAB SERVICES 159148 JIM EVANS $4,519.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159149 EXCALIBUR ENTERPRISES $95.97 VIDEO CAMERA ADAPTER 159150 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $486.33 AIRFREIGHT 159151 FIBERTRON $2,754.23 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 159152 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $733.30 FILTERS 159153 FIRST CHOICE $1,236.56 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 159154 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $4,729.43 LAB SUPPLIES 159155 FLO-SYSTEMS $531.10 PUMP PARTS 159156 FORD TRUCK PARTS $431.00 TRUCK PARTS 159157 FORMA SCIENTIFIC, INC. $10,108.81 LAB EQUIPMENT 159158 FORKERT ENGINEERING & SURVEY $570.83 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 6-8-94 159159 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $146.91 PHOTO SUPPLIES 159160 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,806.83 PAINT SUPPLIES 159161 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $338.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES ~ ca\ • FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159162 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $144.28 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES 159163 GKK CORPORATION $498.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159164 GST, INC. $7,941.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159165 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE $110.00 PERMIT FEE 159166 GARTNER GROUP, INC. $1,185.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS 159167 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $166.34 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 159168 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,544.58 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159169 N. GLANTZ & SON INC. $207.72 TOOLS 159170 GOV'T FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $88.00 PUBLICATIONS 159171 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $930.70 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 159172 GRASSY S.T.I. $505.24 ENGINE PARTS 159173 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $2,680.65 PRINTING 159174 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,692.91 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 159175 HACH COMPANY $51.92 LAB SUPPLIES 159176 HAESTAD METHODS $295.00 SOFlWARE ~ 159177 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,868.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159178 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW $85.00 SUBSCRIPTION 159179 Pl HAWN CO, INC. $16.97 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ~· 159180 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $4,151.50 CONSUL TING SERVICES rt-159181 HIGHLANDER LAUNDROMAT $179.19 PERMIT FEE REFUND tD 159182 Jill Tl, INC. $530.13 TOOLS I w 159183 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF., INC. $187.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS 159184 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $335.75 LAB SUPPLIES 159185 HUNSAKER & ASSOC IRVINE, INC. $600.59 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159186 JOHN HUNT $5,420.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-44-3 159187 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $780.00 WATER USE 159188 IPCOSAFETY $27,159.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159189 IMAGING PLUS $227.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159190 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFGS $2,462.82 FILTERS 159191 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $207.05 CONNECTORS 159192 INORGANIC VENTURES $244.81 LAB SUPPLIES 159193 INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED MGMT $1,575.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 159194 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $926.05 BATTERIES 159195 INTERSTATE ENGINEERING $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159196 ISCO, INC. $792.61 INSTRUMENT 159197 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $310.32 PRINTING 159198 JAMISON ENGINEERING $5,910.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 159199 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,286.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159200 JAY'S CATERING $735.22 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 159201 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $172.64 GAUGE 159202 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,732.05 ELECTRIC PARTS 159203 KAISER PERMANENTE $43,223.37 INSURANCE PREMIUM 159204 DIONNE KARDOS $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159205 KELAR CORPORATION $2,880.00 CONSUL TING SERVICES 159206 KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. $86,174.01 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 159207 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4,285.33 TOOLS I ' FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05128/97 POSTING DA TE 05/28197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159208 DUSTIN LE $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159209 DAVID A LUDWIN $153.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159210 MPS $686.11 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 159211 ~COMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159212 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOC $70.00 MEMBERSHIP 159213 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,507.69 WELDING SUPPLIES 159214 MANTEK $321.99 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 159215 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $662.83 VALVE PARTS 159216 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $22.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159217 MIKE MCCARTHY $399.52 EXPENSE REIMB. 159218 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $69.32 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 159219 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $1,794.21 TOOLS 159220 CHARLES MCRANEY $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159221 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $2,940.94 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159222 METRA HEAL TH $114,457.98 INSURANCE PREMIUMS ~ 159223 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $5,668.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159224 MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING $11,431.51 MECHANICAL REPAIRS ~ 159225 PORTIA MINA $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. I-'· 159226 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $344.80 OFFICE TRAILER LEASE rt 159227 MONTGOMERY WATSON $6,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 2-26-97 tp 159228 MICHAEL D. MOORE $1,181.50 EXPENSE REIMB. .i:::. 159229 MOTEL SIX #34 $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159230 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC $1,137.68 ELECTRICAL PARTS 159231 MOTOROLA, INC. $893.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159232 SAM MOWBRAY $188.47 EXPENSE REIMB. 159233 NADINE'S LAUNDRY $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159234 NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHOPS $139.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 159235 NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS $5,233.10 ELECTRICAL PARTS 159236 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $758.14 EXTERIOR METAL LETTERS 159237 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $9,217.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159238 NETWORK CATALYST, INC $62,916.30 COMPUTER HARDWARE 159239 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 159240 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE $26,658.68 SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 159241 NWLAND/OR $12,986.21 LIFE INSURANCE 159242 01 CORPORATION $181.02 LAB SUPPLIES 159243 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $386.93 SAFETY GLASSES 159244 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $3,047.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159245 OMEGA CORPORATION $153,145.35 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 159246 OMNI WESTERN INC $235.62 TOOLS 159247 ORACLE CORPORATION $1,600.00 SOFTWARE 159248 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $187.68 PUMP PARTS 159249 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $4,074.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159250 COUNTY OF ORANGE $23,473.58 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 159251 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $41,942.97 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 159252 COUNTY OF ORANGE $66.00 PERMIT FEE 159253 PSI $646.50 HARDWARE Cl '"'/ <>\ .. FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122197 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05128/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159254 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $122,470.00 INVESTMENT MGMT. SERVICE RES 95-75 159255 PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. $602.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159256 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. $1,379.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159257 PACIFIC BELL $1,275.50 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159258 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $1,611.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159259 PAGENET $589.43 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 159260 PAINE WEBBER $60,848.44 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 159261 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $447.31 AIR REGULATOR 159262 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159263 PARTS UNLIMITED $831.15 TRUCK PARTS 159264 PERMASEAL $5,087.94 LUBE OIL 159265 CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY $2,099.66 REIMB. PETTY CASH 159266 JERRI Pl $46.65 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159267 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,025.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 159268 MIKE PRLICH & SONS $518,068.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-35R-1 ~ 159269 RM CONTROLS $50.72 PLOTTER PENS 159270 R & R INSTRUMENTS $549.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 159271 REAL TIME $255.00 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES ..... 159272 THE REGISTER $200.00 NOTICES & ADS rt 159273 t.AWRENCE ROOD $79.26 DEDUCTION REIMB. tp 159274 SAVANT $2,017.60 LAB SUPPLIES U1 159275 R. CRAIG SCOTT & ASSOC. $22,164.30 LEGAL SERVICES -PERSONNEL ISSUES 159276 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,215.42 LAB SUPPLIES 159277 SEARS $486.79 TOOLS 159278 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO $1,016.69 REFRIGERATOR 159279 SECOND-SUN $281.39 OFFICE FURNITURE 159280 SERPENTIX CORPORATION $6,558.58 NYLON ROLLER ASSEMBLY 159281 STUART SEVERN $893.66 EXPENSE REIMB. 159282 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,603.56 TOOLS 159283 SHURELUCK SALES $2,267.81 TOOLS/HARDWARE 159284 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $130.00 PROBE 159285 SMITH-EMERY CO. $5,402.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94 159286 SNAP ON I SUN CORP $608.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159287 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1,315.84 TOOLS 159288 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO $46,030.36 POWER 159289 SO CALIF EDISON CO $30,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15-95 159290 SO. CAL. GAS. CO. $20,328.71 NATURAL GAS 159291 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,084.94 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 159292 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO., INC. $250.00 METER 159293 SPRINT $32.70 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159294 SRECO FLEXIBLE $175.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159295 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $539.67 LAB SUPPLIES 159296 STRATEGIC FRAMEWORKS, INC. $12,180.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159297 SUNSET FORD $771.18 TRUCK PARTS 159298 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $143.55 HOSE 159299 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $24.43 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122/97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159300 SYMCAS, INC. $878.75 CONSUL TING SERVICES 159301 T J SAUSAGE KITCHEN INC $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159302 TEL-A-TRAIN INC. $6,529.50 TRAINING VIDEO TAPES 159303 TELEDYNE $1.248.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159304 TEST EQUITY, INC. $1,947.72 POWER SUPPLY 159305 THOMAS BROS MAPS $210.00 PRINTING 159306 TERRY THROOP $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159307 TORNELL & COTTEN $2,219.00 LEGAL FEES 159308 TOXGAURD SYSTEMS, INC. $1,995.00 REPAIR STORAGE TANK MONITORS 159309 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $173.41 TRUCK PARTS 159310 TRUESDAIL LABS $992.00 LAB SERVICES 159311 JG TUCKER & SON, INC. $2,679.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159312 UNIRULE INDUSTRIES $28.94 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159313 UNISOURCE&IOR BUTLER PAPER $93.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159314 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $331.07 PARCEL SERVICES ~ 159315 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 159316 UNOCAL CORPORATION $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159317 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $213.00 LAB SUPPLIES ~· 159318 U S POSTAL SERVICE $5,000.00 POSTAGE rt 159319 VWR SCIENTIFIC $865.68 LAB SUPPLIES tp 159320 TONY VALENZUELA $150.00 EXPENSE REIMB. CJ'\ 159321 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $667.45 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159322 VERNE'S PLUMBING $880.22 PLUMBING SERVICES 159323 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $144.84 FIBER OPTICS 159324 VISION SERVICE PLAN -(CA) $7,644.00 VISION INSURANCE PREMIUM 159325 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $392.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 159326 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,130.56 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 159327 WATERS CORPORATION $5,415.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159328 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY $1,905.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159329 WEKA PUBLISHING, INC. $145.50 PUBLICATION 159330 WELLS SUPPLY CO. $1,171.02 VALVES 159331 WEMAC DIV OF PURITAN-BENNETT $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159332 WESTERN BUSINESS SYSTEMS $938.29 PAYROLL CHECK STOCK 159333 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1,312.90 FILTERS 159334 NANCY WHEATLEY $1,207.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159335 JUDITH A. WILSON $70.89 CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES REIMB. 159336 WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART $116,330.24 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95 159337 XEROX CORP. $9,527.70 COPIER LEASES 159338 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $567.88 LAB SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 $2,043,472.53 FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97 SUMMARY #1 OPERFUND #1 CONST FUND #20PERFUND #2 CAP FAC FUND #2 CONST FUND #30PERFUND #3 CAP FAC FUND #3 CONST FUND #SOPER FUND #5 CAP FAC FUND #5 CONST FUND #60PERFUND #6 CONST FUND #70PERFUND #7 CAP FAC FUND #7 CONST FUND #11 OPER FUND #11 CAP FAC FUND #11 CONST FUND #13 OPER FUND #13 CAP FAC FUND #14 CONST FUND #5&6 CAP FAC FUND #6&7 OPER FUND #7&14 OPER FUND JTOPERFUND CORF SELF·FUNDED INSURANCE FUND JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT $2,057.52 $8,018.96 $13,957.76 $600.59 $20,469.16 $9,021.35 $519,689.47 $18,632.05 $1,379.31 $7,702.97 $4,300.00 $1,272.33 $2,183.38 $3,866.43 $2,639.18 $4,025.93 $2,613.21 $1,158.70 $2,705.33 $347.41 $74.53 $438.43 $498.40 $216.49 $17.18 $386,016.11 $355,312.70 $93,582.37 $580,675.28 $2,043,472.53 PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. 06112197 159659 06/19/97 159676 06/19/97 159677 06/24/97 159945 06/25/97 159946 06/25/97 159947 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID -MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS VENDOR FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO BANK OF AMERICA BANK OF AMERICA NETWORK CATALYST, INC TOTAL CLAIMS PAID SUMMARY #11 OPER FUND JTOPERFUND CORF JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT $17,410.87 $5,318.89 $47,020.74 $138.75 $138.75 $58,364.94 $128,392.94 AMOUNT $1,670.20 $50,669.43 $58,364.94 $17,688.37 $128,392.94 PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE POWER POWER BANKING SERVICES BANKING SERVICES SOFTWARE I , •.. "Protecting the Public R l h . ea t and Environment Through Excellence in Wastewater Systems" N~~PIPELINE fgro~ l "3i/tflJ1f11 of )J/8 ~mf!" So how does it feel to be Operator of the Year for Plant 1? Well, we asked Doug Emery who was recently presented with this award. "It makes me feel appreciated for doing a good job." The Operator of the Year is chosen by the entire Operations staff including supervisors and managers. They have a first round of votes to choose the primary candidates and then a final vote for the winner. "It is not a popularity contest. There are several attributes that we look for in an operator," says John Finias, Chief Operator. Attitude, job interest, knowledge and quality of work are a few of the qualities that staff consider. Other traits include initiative, New Reporting Relatlonshlps Assigned Assistant General Manager for Administration Judy Wilson marked her last day at the Districts on Thursday, August 21 , exactly two years and one day after joining the Vol. 4 No. 6 August 22, 1997 dependability, and how quickly the employee learns new procedures. Doug began his career at the Districts in 1988 as a Mechanic. After two years, he became a Plant Operator. His role as operator contributes to the success of the Districts in many ways. "Although I am only a small part of the Operations and Maintenance Department, it is up to me to make sure that wastewater coming through the plant is treated according to industry standards .... every time," says Doug. Most of the work he does is routine but, on occasion, the excitement can increase with a crisis such as the one that occurred five months ago. Doug was out on a second routine round just to make sure that everything was running smoothly. There were no signs that anything was wrong but, when he made it to the basement of the thickener building, there was sludge all over the floor and walls. He could not tell off the top of his head where the problem was but he knew he had to move fast. He called on the help of his co-workers and within a few minutes realized that a coupling had come undone which was causing a powerful leak. Through careful maneuvering and with the help of another mechanic, they were able to fasten the coupling and avoid a major spill. Doug, who is a first time award recipient, is proud to be a part of such a dedicated team and is a very dedicated employee himself. In fact, in the 9 years that Doug has been at the Districts, he has never missed a day of work. Congratulatlonsl In the next issue of Pipeline we will spotlight Plant 2 Operator of the Year, Peter McGrath . agency, to become the Director of the Bureau of Sanitation for the City of Los Angeles. Judy's accomplishments belie her short tenure here. She was responsible for designing and implementing a performa nee-based organizational structure and for developing new policies and procedures to enhance the efficiency of our administrative functions. She established our Communications Department and our Training and Education Division and worked with Ed Hodges and Chris please turn to page 3 ~ • • ' County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Californi1 • • • '• . . As part of the Bring Your Son to Work Day, representatives from various areas of the plants told our young guests about what they do at the Districts and the training and experience required to do those jobs. Some presentations were funny; others were more serious in nature. Mitch Trivanovich, Plant 2 Mechanical Maintenance, wrote a poem. It was so popular, we decided to oublish it in Pipeline. We hope you enjoy it as much 3S our guests and their parents did. If gears don't turn or gates won't close, when pumps can't pump 'cause shafts are froze, the bearing needs changi.ng, the alignment needs set, a bolt needs tightening, there's one sure bet. There's a fellow in blue with certification who's out in the field with real dedication to keep the plants running t and never get mad l and you should be proud ... because he's your dad (or mom). • • • II • • lntergrated Emergencgy Response Plan (IERP) Update • The Integrated Emergency Response Plan (IERP) has been completed, all employees have received an overview of the Districts' I ERP, and specific training for the Districts' Incident Command System (ICS) personnel has begun. Here's an update ... and a look at what's next ... in our emergency-preparedness efforts, according to Dan Tunnicliff of the Safety and Emergency Response Division. All Department Directors, Division Managers, and IERP Review Team Members have received a copy of the IERP. Until the IERP is available on-line, please contact one of these individuals if you'd like to see a copy of this two-volume document. e Information on evacuation diagrams posted in buildings has been updated to include assembly areas to report to during an evacuation. The diagrams will also illuminate in the dark. • Additional training courses for the Districts' ICS personnel are under development. • Functional exercises are being planned to test specific components of the IERP. HAZMAT drills, evacuation drills, and damage assessmenVsearch and rescue exercises are under development. A HAZMAT Group drill will be conducted during September. The skills and lessons learned from functional exercises will be used in a Full-Scale Exercise which will involve outside agencies, including the Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach fire departments. e The Safety and Emergency Response Division is working with the Information Technology Division to provide the IERP on-line. If you have any questions or are interested in becoming a member of the Districts' ICS Organization please contact Dan Tunnicliff at extension 2143. MEETING DATE: 08/27/97 DISTRICT 1 (LU12) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• MC GUIGAN •••••••••••••••••• _L (PERRY/SCHAFER) •••••••••••• FERRYMAN •••••••••••••••••• _L (COON12) ........................ MURPHY ••••••••••••••••••••••• _L__ (POTTS) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• SALTARELLI •••••••••••••••••• ~ (STEINER) ........................ &Pffl!R ....................... _v_ DISTRICT 2 (MAER12WEILER) ............. ECKENRODE .................. _L__ (COON12) •••••••••••••••••••••••• MURPHY ••••••••••••••••••••••• _L (HOLMBERG) •••••••••••••••••••• ANDERSON ................... ...f'd:::::_ (PETRIKIN) ••••••••••••••••••••••• COLLINS ....................... ~ (BELL) ............................. DENES .......................... ..L (SIMONOFF) ..................... DUNLAP ....................... _L._ (BROADWATER) ............... LEYES •••••••••••••••••••••••••• ,.L._ (LU12) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• MCGUIGAN ................... ~ (BANKHEAD) .................... NeR6¥-......................... v (STEINER) ........................ ~ ....................... ~ (SCHWING) •••••••••••••••••••••• WEDAA ........................ ~ (DALY) ............................ ZEMEL •••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~ DISTRICT 3 · (EVANS) •••••••••••••••••••••••••• RICE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• _1L (WALKER) ........................ MINER BRADFORD ......... ~ (HOLMBERG) .................... ANDERSON ................... ~ (FORSYTHE) ..................... BROWN •••••••••••••••••••••••• ..L_ (JONES) ........................... CARROLL ...................... _L_ (PETRIKIN) •••••••••.••••••••••••• COLLINS ....................... ~ (DOTSON) •••••••••••••••••••••••• DONAHUE ••••••••••••••••••••• (SIMONOFF) ..................... DUNLAP ••••••••••••••••••••••• (BROADWATER) ............... LEYES .......................... ~ (MAULLER) •••••••••••••••••••••• MARSHALL ................... ~ (LUTZ) ••.••••••••••••.••••••••••••• MCGUIGAN ••••••••••••••••••• ~ (BANKHEAD) •••••••••••••••••• '!':-NeRB'f"' ••••••••••••••••••••••••• _JL. (STEINER) ........................ 'SPFF2ER' ....................... ~ (HARMAN) ••••••••••••••••••••••• SULLIVAN ..................... _L (JEMPSA) ........................ SYLVIA ........................ _IL_ (DALY) ............................ ZEMEL .......................... L... DISTRICTS (NOYES) .......................... DEBAY ......................... _L IDEBAY) .......................... NOYES ......................... ~ (SPl12ER) •••••••••••••••••••••••• STEINER ....................... ~ DISTRICTS (PERRY/SCHAFER) ............ FERRYMAN ................... ~ (SPITZER) ........................ STEINER ...................... . (THOMSON) ..................... DEBAY ....................... .. DISTRICT 7 (POTTS) ........................... SALTARELLI .................. ~ (HAMMOND) ................... £ Stll?A ......................... .. (THOMSON) ..................... DEBAY ....................... .. (PERRY/SCHAFER) ............ FERRYMAN ................. .. (LU12) ............................. MCGUIGAN ................. .. (COONTZ) ........................ MURPHY ....................... ~ (SPITZER) ........................ STEINER ....................... _L DISTRICT 11 (HARMAN) ....................... BE I TLOFF ..................... ~ (HARMAN) ....................... SULLIVAN ••••••••••••••••••••• (STEINER) ........................ Sfl IZEH ..................... .. DISTRICT 13 (SIMONOFF) ..................... DUNLAP....................... $- (WEDAA) ......................... SCHWING ................... .. (SPITZER) ........................ STEINER ....................... ~ (COONTZ) ........................ MURPHY ...................... . (DALY) ............................ ZEMEL ........................ .. TIME: 7:30 p.m. DISTRICT 14 · t (HAMMOND) .................... ~ ••••••••••••••••••••••• (POTTS) ........................... SALTARELLI.................. · :::= {COONTZ) ........................ MURPHY....................... __ (SPITZER) ........................ STEINER ....................... .....J::!:./ __ (MILLER) .......................... SWAN .......................... _£ __ DISTRICTS: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 JOINT BOARDS (HOLMBERG) .................... ANDERSON................... t"v (FORSYTHEt ..................... BROWN ........................ ~ (JONES) ........................... CARROLL •••••••••••••••••••••• -V CPETRIKINt ....................... COLLINS....................... v (NOYES/THOMSON) •••••••••• DEBAY ......................... v CBEW ............................. DENES .......................... ~ (HARMAN) ....................... e!1"Pl:8PP ..................... ~ (DOTSON) •••••••••••••••••••••••• DONAHUE..................... V (SIMONOFF) ••••••••••••••••••••• DUNLAP ••••••••••••••••••••••• ..L....._ (MAERTZWEILER) ............. ECKENRODE •••••••••••••••••• ....i:::::_ __ (PERRY/SCHAFER) ............ FERRYMAN ................... ~ .L-___,_ (BROADWATER) ............... LEYES .......................... ~ (MAULLER) •••••••••••••••••••••• MARSHALL ••••••••••••••••••• _;L (LUTZJ ............................. MC GUIGAN .................. ~ (WALKER) •••••••••••••••••••••••• MINOR BRADFORD ......... ...L (COONTZ) ........................ MURPHY ....................... ..L (BANKHEAD) .................... UOr\B: ; ........................ ~ (DEBAY) .......................... NOYES ......................... ~ {EVANS) •••••••••••••••••••••••••• RICE ............................. ~ (POTTS) ........................... SALTARELLI •••••••••••••••••• ~ (WEDAA) ......................... SCHWING ..................... __L (HAMMOND) ................... ~ ......................... ...Ji:::::::. STEINER) ......................... SPIRER ....................... - (SPITZER) ........................ STEINER....................... > (HARMAN) ....................... SULLIVAN .................... . (MILLER) .......................... SWAN .......................... ~ (JEMPSA) ........................ SYLVIA ........................ / (SCHWING) ...................... WEDAA ........................ v (DALY) ............................ ZEMEL .......................... -;:::;>" STAFF ANDERSON ...................... _L ~~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ UNDER ........................... . LUDWIN ......................... . MCINlYRE ....................... ~ OOTEN ........................... . PETERMAN ..................... . smEED .......................... . TUCHMAN ..................... .. WHEATLEY ...................... :Z WILSON .......................... . OTHERS WOODRUFF ..................... ..L. ANDRUS •••••••••••••••••••••••••• KNOPF ............................. -- LEE ................................. V LINDSTROM .................... . NIXON ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• SHAW ........................... .. STONE ............................ ,/ H:\wp.dta\admln\BS\DIRECTOR\OLI02.doc 06/24/97 phone: [714] 962-2411 mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Member Agencies • Cities Anaheim Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda County of Orange Sanitary Districts Costa Mesa Garden Grove Midway City Water Districts Irvine Ranch COUNTY SANITATION DI STRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA August21, 1997 To the Chairman and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Subject: Board Letter Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) Board Secretary The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional information on any of the items, please call me. 40 Days and 40 Nights of Rain: The Sequel As you just read, this winter is expected to bring record rainfall as a result of an El Nino condition in the Pacific Ocean. We are preparing for the worst. Staff from Engineering, Operations and Maintenance, and Emergency Response is meeting regularly to develop a winter game plan. We will use our experience with previous wet winters, a recently drafted report by our Strategic Plan consultant, the Districts' Integrated Emergency Response Plan, and staffs most recent thinking to formulate the Flood Contingency Plan. We will also begin an outreach program to the city managers and city public work directors to limit the practice of opening sanitary sewer manholes to relieve local street flooding. On the facilities readiness side of the equation, we will have the standby 78-inch outfall back in service in mid-October after having improved it with a taller and more earthquake resistant surge tower. This improvement adds capacity and reliability to the standby outfall. Other minor improvements within the treatment plants will give us additional short-term storage, which will allow us to decrease peak flow rates, if necessary. We'll let you know about additional details as they develop. SAWPA has Shown Us the Money On August 19, SAWPA General Manager Neil Cline delivered the attached letter and a check in the amount of $4,052,476.53, for the purchase of the 9th mgd treatment capacity unit. As noted in the letter, "Meet and Confer'' discussions are continuing on the payment method for the 10th mgd capacity unit. There are other issues besides the additional capacity that need to be resolved, including interest payments. Approximately $60,000 in interest has been paid. Gary Streed, Director of Finance, will provide an update on this issue at the August 27 Joint Boards meeting. Procurement Card Program Marc Dubois, our Contracts/Purchasing Manager, is currently investigating and will subsequently launch a pilot "procurement card" program with the goal of reducing purchasing and accounts payable costs for small-dollar, high-volume purchases by utilizing electronic commerce technologies. The procurement card, often called "smart cards," provide stored intelligence using unique integrated circuitry embedded in the card to store vital information. The stored data is pre-loaded on the card with A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 19 54 Joint Chair and Members of the Boards of Directors Page 2 August21 , 1997 set dollar values and security features to insure the Districts' procurement policies and procedures are not compromised. The pilot program will incorporate written, stringent guidelines on appropriate staff usage, transaction dollar limits, and oversight. Hundreds of public agencies throughout the United States have adopted this procurement strategy as a common sense approach to utilizing technology as an effective tool for increased efficiency. It was recently noted in Orange County's agenda report that they are launching a similar program. If you have questions on this program, please call Marc at Extension 2650. August DARTBOARD The August 5 edition of the DARTBOARD is included in the attachments for your information. It provides an update on current DART team activities. Odor Complaints During the warmer, more humid weather, odor complaints increase. Attached is a copy of an Complaint Report dated August 5/6, which is typical of the calls, and outlines the steps taken by staff to determine the cause and correct the situation. Operations' engineers and technical staff have evaluated our existing odor control system and changed the fan operation of some facilities to improve performance. "A Blast from the Past" Staff recently found a scrapbook filled with pictures and articles from the early days of the Districts. I have included a copy of an August 1959 article from the PUBLIC WORKS Magazine that was written by the then General Manager Lee M. Nelson. If any of you would like to see the scrapbook, contact Blake Anderson at Extension 2020. Title V Federal Operating Permit Application for Plant No. 2 Staff reports that the Title V federal operating permit application for Plant No. 2 has been completed and submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) by the July 28, 1997 compliance date pursuant to the Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) amendments of 1990. Title V is a federal operating permit program for major sources of air pollutant~. The program is l~ca.lly . implemented by the SCAQMD. Title V does not include any new em1ss1on reduction requirements but includes new permitting, monitoring, reporting and record keeping requirements. Preparation of this Title V permit application was a major undertaking, which required a substantial commitment of internal resources with some additional consultant Joint Chair and Members of the Boards of Directors Page 3 August 21, 1997 support. We believe the result of this significant effort is an excellent Title V application document that goes beyond the strict requirements of the SCAQMD. We expect to receive the draft Title V permit from SCAQMD in November 1997. The overall impact of the new Title V permit on Districts' operations will be increased monitoring and reporting requirements, and more public scrutiny on the Districts' operations. Experience operating under the new Title V permit is needed before staff can determine its impact on resource requirements and the compliance status. We saved considerable consultant fees by using our own staff to complete most of the application. Source Control Brochures for New and Existing Businesses As we have informed the Boards on previous occasions, the Districts' Source Control Division has been developing a Business Assistance Center to provide new and existing businesses in Orange County a "one-point" contact w ith the Districts and a resource for information regarding permitting, compliance and pollution prevention. One of the tasks of the Center is to promote a better understanding of the Districts' goal and how the Source Control Program works to protect the environment. Particular emphasis is being placed on disseminating information regarding regulations, permitting and compliance assistance to businesses, either new or existing in Orange County, when dealing with the Districts' regulatory and environmental mandates. To that end, the Center is developing (with the assistance of Graphic Services) a series of five educational brochures that will provide both business and the community at large information on what they need to do "to connect" with the Districts. This series of brochures will provide those concerned with a practical "how to" handbook. The first brochure called "New Business? Old Business? How to Connect", has already been published. The second brochure in the series, "New Business? Old Business? Wastewater Discharge Permits", has just been published and is a guide to permitting wastewater discharges. It contains an easy-to-follow checklist and diagram that assists industries determine what kind of permit they would need for the type of operation they intend to run. Copies of both brochures, which were prepared by our Graphic Services group, are included with the attachments. If you would like additional copies of either or both of these brochures, please call Adriana Renescu at Extension 3828. Joint Chair and Members of the Boards of Directors Page 4 August21 , 1997 Rate and Planning Advisory Committee Member's Comments We have received a very complimentary letter (copy attached) from Mark Asturias, City of Garden Grove staff member and a member of both the Rate and Planning Advisory Committees. We have passed this on to our consultants, who have guided these efforts. Biosolids "Reinvestment" and Related News Included in the attachments is an August 4, 1997 fax from WEF that discusses a July 31 joint WEF/EPA meeting to discuss a proposal for EPA to "reinvest" in biosolids. For the past two years, EPA has decreased its support for biosolids activities. The proposal follows a negative series of reports on CNN, which we relayed to you last month. Related issues are also discussed in the fax. Utility Deregulation Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, has reviewed an August 15, 1997 LA Times article on power deregulation. In the event you did not read it, I have attached a copy for you. "Rule of Necessity" and the Political Reform Act (PRA} Attached is the August 15, 1997 LAW WATCH newsletter from Foley Lardner Weissburg & Aronson, which outlines regulations of the PRA pertaining to invoking the "rule of necessity". This rule allows a public official with an actual or potential conflict of interest on a particular matter to vote on that matter if the lack of his or her vote would prevent the governing body from taking action. If you have any questions on this issue, you may want to discuss it with Tom Woodruff, or your agency's attorney. Recent Newspaper Articles of Interest Attached are articles that you may have missed in the local newspapers. I have included the article from the Sunday, August 17, LA Times on reclaimed waste water, which addresses the issues OCWD and OCSD may be facing with the OCR project. Public Awareness Water Conservation Program To possibly reduce the flows coming into the plants du~ng .thes~ p~ak flow perio?s, the Districts will be contacting Los Angeles County Sanrtat1on D1stncts and the City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation to develop a regional, public awareness Joint Chair and Members of the Boards of Directors Page 5 August21 , 1997 water-conservation program. For example, we may be asking the public to limit the number of loads of laundry done on anticipated peak flow days and to take shorter showers, both of which will help reduce flows. By working on a regional rather than countywide basis, we will increase the probability of media exposure. And, with greater exposure comes greater awareness and participation. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, will be heading this project. Computer Purchase Loan Program The Computer Purchase Loan Program has been a great success. To date, we have had 40 employees apply for loans. Approximately $100,000 dollars have been spent, and the Human Resources Department is continually receiving applications. If demand continues, the FAHR Committee has agreed to request additional funding by the Boards. Sewer Service Fee Refunds One of the issues that RAC has been looking at is transitioning from a system of charging commercial users on the basis of square footage to a system of property tax categories that are then charged on the basis of strength and flow. Under the new system being evaluated by RAC, restaurants would be a category and would have higher rates because of the strength of the discharge. On the other hand, big box retail and warehouses, although having significant square footage, would enjoy a sizeable decrease based on low strength and flow. The inequities in the current system have resulted in a large number of refunds. Firms, such as Revenue Enhancement, file on behalf of their clients and receive a share of the clients' savings as their fee. In 1996-97, the Districts refunded over $7 .5 million to firms filing appeals. This represents over 10% of our anticipated user fee revenue for 1996-97. We are hopeful that a user fee system based on flow and strength would result in a more equitable system with less administrative time spent on appeals and less revenue loss to the Districts. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Pn J)l (£~ 11 Donald F. Mcintyre / General Manager DFM:jt H:IWP.OTA\AOMIN\GM\OFM\BOARO.L TR\97\082798.00C Joint Chair and Members of the Boards of Directors Page 6 August 21 , 1997 Attachments: August 19 Letter from SAWPA August 5 DARTBOARD Odor Complaint dated August 5/6 Article from August 1959 edition of PUBLIC WORKS Magazine Two Source Control Business Assistance Brochures August 5, 1997 Letter from Mark Asturias August 4, 1997 Fax from WEF re Biosolids August 15, 1997 Memo re LA Times Article on Power Deregulation August 15, 1997 LAW WATCH newsletter re "Rule of Necessity" Articles of Interest published during the past month Donald F. Mcintyre Published by OARTCommunications Task Tieam August 5, 1997 DARTBOARD DART: DISTRICTS ASSESSMENT AND BEfNVENTION TEAM Arlmjnistratjon Pn1ctices Team During July, APT members contacted Department Heads regarding the Retention of , Records report. The report is used to gather information on recommended retention times, permit requirements and records computerized or hard copied. July 1 3, the APT invited Penny Kyle, Michelle Tuchman and Algee Eusley(Records Librarian Orange County Water District.) Algoe Eusley presented a general overview of Records Management and helped the team in determining the right approach to record management goals and objectives. In June, the APT met with Finance to discuss the use of the emergency Overtime Report. After discussion, Finance said that they dfd not use or need the report. However, a memo will be written to inform Districts' staff that each division should develop limited procedures for their own needs. This change significantly reduces · the materials and labor r~quired for distribution of these reports. July 7. APT drafted a memo for the main DART member's review. The team continues to review the Travel Authorization and Expense Reports. 1-n August. a field trip 1o Honda is scheduled to see their · retention and as-built documentation. Adaptive Work Force 1 Late in June the AWF team formed a P-2 area team. Their first meeting included skilled trades and cmerators. On Juty 1 they~ requirements. Chris talked about discussed scheduling boards'"for data linking and recommended PM's and receiving them before that the team choose an Oracle- the first of each month, scheduling based CMMS. There will be a and possible interaction between future project for warehouse data the area team and TPIT. To integration so the CMMS can talk improve productivity, TPIT is to J.D. Edwards. Currently team looking at efficiency, best members are involved in polling practices. communication, ; stal<eholders, review of the effectiveness, planning, planning and scheduling reports scheduling, integration, safety, and compiling survey comments. accountability and warehouse! Also, the team is idenlifying f maintenance to improve efficiency warehouse/purchasing and I due to lack of parts. July 15 , the information technology/data AWF team met with Raj concerns. Savilingam a consultantfor j maintenance reorganization and TPIT voted to bring him on board. July The team is working closely with J 29, the AWF formed task teams the J-42 P.lant Automation Project. f for broadhanding, skill-based pay Dean Fisher attended the July 1 I and to evaluate cross-training. In meeting as a communication link ~ early August, Bob Ooten will between the projects. The team I discuss the States Regional Board will work closely on Construction approach. to certifying the drawings and P&IDs. TPIT is j maintenance trades so that drafting a report to outline the work 1 equipment isolation can be done. for resources and scheduling , CMMSTeam ln the later part of June a memo went to Gerald Jones reporting that each member will need to spend approximately 15 hours per week to do the required research. A Project Plan is complete and includes systems requirements and performance, implementation study, system baseline, bench , marking, potential vendors, cost analysis, finaLreport and evaluation. The Project time line is July ·97 io October '97. July 2, members of the CMMS team met with Chris Dahl to discuss systems required to support J-42. July 2 marked the beginning of Digestion map13ing tor both ptants. July 16, Jill Howard met with Joe Tucker to discuss CMMS automation activities and tagging for the ' automation project. A table giving team member responsibilities were discussed and distributed at the July 30 meeting. ' I 4 POTPOURRI I July 16, selected members of j DART pre!iented the Phase 111-Six I Month Sta:\us Report to Don Mcintyre. You can contact Randy I Harris, ~.6017 for a copy. _ • .. I -· ' Plantl D Plant2 [251 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Complaint Report " ; . ~-. . . . ··, ... o.ate : ,A t.13 uQ T s ' b ) Complaint Type : Odor Tim<. : 1.. "#'J _r'" ~~-----~~......--~~ Day : -~S (w.e,A Noise other _o _________ _ Other ca n Complaintant : .0{ . Wq41A f k Phone: 'J&S--~ s5--3 Address: Cif ~ (. C) /It ~ u~~ Cross Streets : e('f>-d fc. ~ft ff.. ~ &lt ! . /Vi * Include the location of the complaint and the day and time when it was first noticed if dijf erent than the date and time of the complaint. Date: <:&I s-r~) I q 7 Time : __ -1.-____...-Z........,<2 ...... Q...,.._ __ Action Taken Odor Circuit Taken: Odor Circuit Included: Wind Direction and Speed : Yes Yes No No B Was the Treatment Plant the Odor Source? Yes ~ No D ** If Odor is related to Huntington Beach storm drain system call (714) 960-8861 and relay all inf o'?"ati.on cc : General Manager Asst. General Manager Director : 0 & M Control Center PL 1 Operations Center PL2 Pl Chief Operator P2 Chief Operator Air Quality Manager 3410 AQMD Engineer Signed:=~· aperati ns Supervisor Date : $ / <o / 'I 7 ' REVISED:12/18/96 G:\EXCEl.\OM\3440\LOSURDO\COMPLAINT.XLS --. .... tLAllJ .! !!l!!l!. CIRCll!l ····- -······ .. llCUll• tU•Hftlf -· iiiia··· lllrLUEllT JLOU: l '1.c.2 HGD H£1HE LL lEVEL 1 7.3 FEET reel l FUD RAJ£ I '-\ :1 r BALS/HIN. TOTAL PEROXIDE: q,oo GALS/DAY [0111111: . ' . \ NOTE1 Fnt.LnWIHG AH DOOR cm·PLAINT IN:UJOE lltE SQUAnE SPACES IN lHF. nnnn r.mr.un. DATE: :»I s/9 7 PAY: (; (kMtlf) TIHE: "'2-I ! S: OPER: -0~ (-ltJ+.,.SJ?c 111 Hll Vl!l.OC I Tl 1 5 lllltll!Atl lllftltcflUN DRUJa. m z- BERMUDA 3 KAHULUI MAHALO ALOHA PLAY A 4 z :s !!! if. !!j MOKIHANA HUDSON < < ::;; u ----- \ < a: I-~RAMBLE (I) GULSTRAND DAYTONA <( I (/) ::> CD ,_ < a: 0 ~ m _, < m Z MOLOKAI TIKJ < 3 LANAI LEILANI E ii ::> t? :s _, ii < :;: (I) 0 5 iii ifi ROCKPOINT (I) BEACHS DE z ::;; ~ < u w ifi ::;; u 8 ::> < (I) (I) > w ~BANNING MELINDA 0 z ~ 0 0 0 !: (C)1994 T hnm::ls Arns M;:inc; : ... PUBLIC WORKS Magazine Vol. 90, No. 8 • A~gust, 1959 103 Miles of Trunk Sewers .. for CQUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS LEE M. NELSON, General Manager, Orange County Sanitation Districts, Santa Ana, California ONE of the largest sewer projects ever undertaken in this coun- . try was started in Orange County, California, this past year. In July and August voters in three of eleven Sanitation Districts located in the county went to the polls and ap- proved bond issues totaling $23,- 180,000. The fact that passage of the bund issues meant increased tax rates from 9 cents to 20 cents per $100 assessed property valuation had no effect in deterring the voters. In Sanitation District 11, for instance, where a two-thirds majority was needed the issue passed by a vote of 567 to 147. Voter acceptance of these bond issues was not just a natural oc- currence though. Through the ef- forts of our Orange County Sanita- tion Districts staff, an effective public information campaign was launched to make residents acutely aware of the serious need for ex- panded sewer facilities. The people were informed that many trunk sewers in the area were flowing from 93 percent to 100 per- cent full during peak hours; and on a few occasions they had been so overtaxed that sewage backed up into the streets. This, plus the fact that new residents are moving into Orange County at the rate of 200 each day, necessitating 50 new homes daily or over 18,000 homes a year, made the residents realize that they had no real choice in the mat- ter. Disneyland, located in the popu- lation center of Orange County, attracts additional millions of visi- tors to the area. New sewers were needed, and immediately. The development of any area, in my opinion, is dependent on four basic facilities: 1) water supply; 2) transportation and communications; 3) power-electric and gas; 4) waste ·----~-.... : .~ ::~ . :: ~ ~~ ~ -,J . ' e LOCATION of trunk aewer lines needed by Orange County ii pointed out tO the County Supervisors and the County Health Officer by the author, at right~ ...• ----~ . -·· __ ..:...._ ----·-----·-• ·,!..; disposal -domestic and industrial. Orange County was in adequate supply of the first three, but not the fourth. It's my personal feeling that sewers become important only when absent. They're like the fourth wheel on an automobile. District Organization Perhaps one thing that made the project so.successful was the unique organization of our Sanitation Dis- tricts. They were created because of a geographical need. Sewage dis- posal in southern California poses more of a problem than in most areas of the nation as there are no rivers with sufficient water the year around to carry off treated e GRAVEL bed in trench bottom provides stable bed for the clay pipe, Over Y2 mile was laid daily in District 11 to complete work before start of the rainy season. wastes. In Orange County some of our cities are many miles distant from the shorelines of the Pacific. In 1921 the Orange County Joint Outfall Sewer (JOS) was organized by agreement between the cities of e EACH YEAR, in housing developments and growing cities, 18,000 new homes are being built in Orange County. New trunl.. sewers became a critical need and County sewage treatment plants were expanded. Plant No. 1 now has a capacity of 55 mgd. Anaheim and Santa Ana for the purpose of sharing jointly construc- tion costs and the operation of a screening plant and ocean outfall. Between 1921 and 1927, the cities of Fullerton and Orange and the sanitary districts of La Habra, Placentia, Garden Grove and Buena Park became participants in this joint agreement. Through these participating agen- cies, the JOS constructed a treat- ment plant, several trunk sewers and an outfall to the Pacific Ocean, now known as the old ocean outfall. Thus, eight of the northern and central cities and sanitary districts were served by a jointly owned sewerage system at a cost within the economic capability of each. There were many problems in administering this joint venture at city levels due to limitations of city authority outside of corporate limits. Community organizations and civic groups were conscious of county- wide development over a period of 20 years and of the growing need for a program to service rapidly expanding areas. The factors of ad- ministration, expansion and devel- opment called for further action. In 1946 the Orange County Board of Supervisors authorized a board of consulting engineers to prepare a sewerage survey report. After considerable study this report was modified and became the basis for the formation of the eight sanitation districts. Organizational phases of the sanitation districts were under jurisdiction of the Board of Super- visors. After formation, each district became an independent political subdivision with its own governing board which operates under the dis- trict act of the health and safety code of the state. The function of collecting and transporting sewage from local areas to the sanitation districts' facilities is performed by cities, sanitary dis- tricts and other special districts. Through inter-district contracts, means of administration, construc- tion and operation of facilities for the eight districts were established. The joint administrative agreement and the joint construction and operation agreement are the two basic contracts governing the com- bined business of the districts. Pro- visions are made to permit other agencies or combinations of agencies to participate in the Joint Adminis- trative Organization. Under these Functions of Sanitation Districts TRUNK SEWERS OWN & OPERATE TREATMENT PLANTS OCEAN OUTFALL e SCHEMATIC diagram of the sewage collection system owned and operated by the Orange County Sanitation Districts. Trunk sewers are 1 S-inch to 78-inch diameter. contracts the Joint Administrative Organization, with one central of- fice, administers the business and operating expense in direct ratio that its usage of facilities bears to the cost, and all districts share the joint administrative expense. Under California law, county sanitation districts have broad pow- ers to provide collection, treatment and disposal of all types of waste. However, all of the sanitation dis- tricts in Orange County limit their activities to area-wide collection, treatment and disposal of sewage and liquid in.dustrial wastes. They do not handle garbage, refuse and other solid wastes; neither do they own or operate local sewage col- lection systems. Their function i..;; the ownership and operation of ma- jor trunk sewers (from 15-in. to 78-in. diameters), two sewage treat- ment plants and a 78-in. diameter disposal outfall 7 ,000 feet into the BUlLETIN TO PHYSICIANS retained independent engineering firms to proceed with plans to pro- vide the necessary sewage disposal facilities. Lowry-Overmyer and As- sociates of Santa Ana were assigned the work in District 11 and the same firm working jointly with Boyle En- gineering, also of Santa Ana, pre- pared surveys for Districts 2 and 3.) Promoting Bond Issues Early in 1958 the Orange County Sanitation Districts started their promotion campaign to acquire the needed increase in collection facili- ties. Individual promotion programs were started in Districts 2, 3 and 11. In District 2 a bond issue of S8,650,- 000 was proposed; in District 3, $13,- 015,000; and in District 11, $1,515,000. The overwhelming voter approval in all three Districts gave us the confidence we needed and we im- mediately set to work. Actual con- struction started in September, ,._;;;-,..;,;.- ff l~t re· canc1 HOM1r 'ifu .... ·SEWER BONDS • •ucri0~ ·AUGUST ·5th 1958 PUBLIC \"FORMATION PAMPHLET e SPECIAL bulletins and public information pamphlets formed part of the effec- tive promotional campaign that brought an overwhelming approval of the bond issue. Pacific Ocean. The original collec- tion of sewage at the local level is handled by individual cities and sewering districts within the Sani- tation Districts. Sanitation Districts The accompanying chart shows schematically the system owned and operated by the Sanitation Districts in Orange County and also shows the cities and local agencies from which sewage and industrial wastes are collected in Districts 2, 3 and 11. Late in 1957, the Directors of our Orange County Sanitation Districts 1958, .·and will be completed, with the system in operation, by Decem- ber, 1959. Extra strength, vitrified clay pipe was selected as the most suitable pipe for the job. Some 70 miles of clay pipe, ranging from 12 inches to 42 inches in diameter, will be used in lengths up to 5 feet. The proposed trunk sewers are designed to serve and have a useful life of at least 50 years. In areas within the three districts where pipe over 42 inches in diameter is required, the larger pipe will be protected by mitable liners. Many of the gravity sewers in the area are located below sea level and are subject to tidal actions. Hence, rapid pipe laying is economically necessary. George Dakovich, Los Angeles contractor installing pipe in District 11, has been laying over a half mile of pipe a day all with hot pour joints. Over 103 miles of pipe in all 3 districts will be in the ground and operating as an integral part of our Orange County sanita- tion system by December of this year. To the best of my knowledge, this makes it one of the largest sin- gle sewer projects ever undertaken in this country and scheduled for completion in so short a time. After treatment, all sewage from the collection system passes into an ocean outfall line and is pumped into the ocean some 3 miles from shore. Since this part of southern California is noted for its vacation areas and beaches we have to insure that there is no danger of contami- nating the coastal waters beyond safe limits. To detect possible pol- lution, readings and water samples are taken twice a day, every 3,000 feet, along the coastal section in the vicinity of the outfall. A great deal of credit for the suc- cessful planning and execution of this undertaking must go to Willis Warner, who has been Chairman of the Orange County Board of Super- visors for over 20 years. The mayors and city officials of the cities within the districts were also highly instru- mental in informing the citizenry, as were the various Citizens Com- mittees composed of businessmen, educators, the clergy and others. Everyone pitched in to see that the voters were apprised of the facts. The voters did the rest. We now have a sanitary collection system that will be adequate to the year 2000. The excellence of its de- sign will make subsequent additions a simple matter. I'd personally like to urge officials of other sanitation districts through- out the country to take special note of what has been done here. Public works projects do not necessarily take years to get under way; if the need really exists, and you take ad- vantage of every means available to inform the taxpayers, it can be accomplished quickly and efficiently. Perhaps even more important is the fact that if the people are fully in- formed, they will not begin to won- der where their monev went as soon as the trenches a~e covered. As public officials we can't afford to forget that a satisfied citizenry holds the key to the door of future civic improvements. CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 11222 ACACIA PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 3070, GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92642 AGENCY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GARDEN GROVE August 5, 1997 Mr. Don Mcintyre, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Administration Building I 0844 Ellis A venue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 RE: RATE ADVISORY AND PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEES Dear Mr. Mcintyre: (714) 741-5123 As a member of both the Rate Advisory and Planning Advisory Committees I wanted to pass on a personal note to you. I appreciate CSDOC's efforts in working with the Orange County community to establish these committees to look at CSDOC's future. The RAC and PAC have met for almost a year now and CSDOC staff have been very professional and patient in responding to our questions and comments. I have personally spoken with some of your staff, including Nancy Wheatley, Gary Streed and Judy Wilson, to name just a few. They have always been willing to take time out of their busy schedules to talk over issues or questions I have. I also want to congratulate you on your choice of consultants. Mr. Paul Brown of Camp Dresser & McKee and Mr. Steve McDonald of Carollo Engineers have made ,the process educational, interesting and informative. To their credit they have also kept a widely diverse group of people with different interests and agendas focused on our mission as an advisory body. They have also been able to "roll with the punches" whenever the committee's throw them one. I know I have tested Mr. Brown's and Mr. McDonald's patience several times but they have always listened and taken the time to meet with me whenever needed to talk about my questions, concerns and comments. I look forward to completing the mission of the two committees. I believe the committees will give CSDOC valuable input about business and residential concerns in Orange County. I know that a few of your Directors have attended our workshops and are aware of our efforts. I hope they appreciate the efforts of CSDOC staff, Camp Dresser & McKee and Carollo Engineers as well, and communicate this to other Directors who have not been able to attend. Sincerely, JJ!~~ Mark Asturias Economic Development Manager MA :mi: (p/econdev/mark/sanitati/sandis7) RUG-04-1997 16:00 LJEF TO: Water EnwiroDDtent Federation® Preserving E, Bnbandng the Global lJfzleJ" EnuhonmenJ MEMORANDUM Distribution 703 984--2492 P.01 l'KES!Dzr-T Dillv G. lbnrLT Co/-.,,_,CA PRESQ)JNl'-ILECT r.. Da!eJamb$Gll, P.f.. ()1114ba,!lti TX ENT bvris. P.E. Stanlon A LcSicur HillnanJ. OR NJ' PiESIDliHl' FROM: Tim Williams. Government Affairs Director Ridwd 1). Kuchwithet, Ph.O •• P.li. K.olUIU Ci~ NO r.DCUml DIRECJ'OJl DATE: August4. 1997 Quinala: Brawn .41e:radria, VA RE: This Week in Washington WEF/EPA Meeting Focuses on Biosolids "Reinvestment'' WEF President Billy Tumer and USEPA Assistant Administrator for Water Bob Perciagepe met July ~1 to di~UHi a proposal for EPA to areinve5r in bio&olid&. WEF, USEPA, and other stakeholders will meet to further discuss the proposal during the WEF/AWWA Joint Water Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference in Philadelphia. PA starting August 2, 1997. For the past two years, EPA has been .decreasing its support for biosolids activities, citing budget constraints and the low risk associated with land application and other management options. But during the July 31 meeting, Perciasepe outlined several areas for increased USEPA support of biosolids recycling. These include: conducting a new national biosolids quality survey (the last survey was completed in 1988); developing a Code of Good Pradice for land application: inaeased USEPA oversight and enforcement; and additional support for technical assistance and research and development. WE.F and other stakeholders have advocated a continued strong role for USEPA in promoting biosolids recycling. The reinvestment proposal follows a negative series of reports on CNN. For further information, contact Gene DeMichele, WEF Biosolids Program Manager at 703/684-2400, or e-mail gdemichele@wef.org. In Related News ••• - A study released August 2 by the Worldwatch Institute warns against the •potential dangers of using sewage sludge as fertilizer on farm lands.• The report, authored by Gary Gardner of Worldwatch Institute, argues the wastewater treatment systems in the United states usually combine household sewage and industrial runoff. and therefore, foods fertilized with such wastes may be tainted with heavy metals and dioxins from the industrial wastes. Gardner also conte~ds the USEPA limits on pollutants in landapplied biosolids are less stringent than many other countries. For a copy of the report, contact Gene DeMichele (see above contact information). 601 Wythe Street • Altundri¥, YA 22314-1994 USA• 1·703-684°2400 • 1-703-684-2492 (FAX) ,, : . ., .I : . '• This Week in Washington August 4, 1997 page2 Clinton Commits Feds to Lake Tahoe Water Quality Plan President Clinton committed the federal government to spend more than $50 million in the next 2 years to stop pollution in lake Tahoe. Clinton said the administration would ''take more than 25 specific actions" to protect the Lake Tahoe Basin, which spans the border between Northern California and Nevada. Among the priorities, he said, is restoration of "the lake's fabled water quality" through cooperative efforts of federal and state agencies, including development of computer models to predict how watershed improvements will contribut~ to water quality and construction of a new plpellne lu t;U1 1v~y wastewater out of the basin. C~Jifnmira ;md Nevada h;;1ve pledQed $XO million to cupport preservatinn nf the lake. which suffers from heavy algae growth Ann the effects of urban runoff. Clinton made the remarks during a visit to the region with Vice President Al Gore, USEPA Assistant Administrator tsob Perclas~µt:, -=-• •d other officials. Correction The July 21, 1997 issue of •This Week in Washington" listed an incorrect bill number for the Toxicity Testing legislation currently before Congress. The correct bill number is H.R.2138. TOTAL P.02 ,, : .. .. , August15, 1997 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Mcintyre General Manager Blake Anderson Chief Operations Officer FROM: Bob Ooten ~l~ Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Article in the Times on Deregulation Marketers are now trying to sell power (see attached article). The key paragraphs to review are underlined on page 4 of the attachment. • Purchasing power will only affect % of the power bill since that is the cost of generation. • Marketers promise savings but cannot guarantee. • The Marketers price to beat will be the benchmark set up by the Statewide Power Exchange. RJO:pjm H:\wp.dta\om\341 O\FINAL\RJO\CORRESP.97\970M0306MEM.DOC Attachment l COLUMN ONE ~ L-, At, T,~ A~~ s l l~ 'l'l7 ·~~ lo-(. j_ -·The State's New Power Brokers r •With utility deregulation months away, salespeople are scrambling to sell electricity in what will be a $6-billion market. By CHRIS KRAUL TIMES STAFF WRITER UPLAND-Articulate and armed with the tools of his trade-glossy brochures and a well-oiled spiel-salesman Tony Wayne drew charts on the conference room wall as he tried to persuade his poker-faced po- tential buyer that he could beat the competition with the lowest price possible. At the top of his game, the graying ex-Marine Corps officer paused only to field questions from his quarry, Lewis Homes property manager Paul Lubin.· ·Simple answers to complex is- sues came easily and nothing threw him off stride. After all, Wayne had given dozens of presentations just like it during thelastyear. · .. Bottom line, we save you 5% to 15%, you're at no risk, and you have 100% reliability, just like now,'' Wayne, 57, said in a calm, assuring tone as he slid a ·contract ·across the table. Scenes like this one are played out countless times a day across California-that of a practiced peddler seeking a lu- crative prize. But Wayne is a new and different kind of sales- man. He's not pushing comput- I .!" t-ers, retirement plans, aluminum I siding or locomotives. He is selling electricity. !"" I •,\ There is a small army of Tony Waynes called .. power market-~ ers" fanning out across the state as the Jan. 1 date of California's i ·electricity deregulation ap-~ proaChes. All are vying for a 1 piece of a $6-billion market by L bustling electrons to millions of t California residential and com- mercial customers who may soon start choosing their power source. i-It's part of a marketing free- for-all that commenced in Sep- tember when Gov. Pete Wilson signed the nation's most com- prehensive electricity deregula- tion law. It ordered that each , residential and business cus- tomer of the three large inves- Pleue see POWER, All --··-.. ·--. __ !".~:..: __ 7'" .. _-.•··-·· ... -· ..... -.... -· • Continued from A1 · · tor-owned utilities-Southern California Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric and San Diego Gas & Electric-be given the choice of · power source. i The upshot of the law i;8 that r Californians who previously 1 thought about electricity only ; when they paid their month9' bills r will soon be making choices o~ I where to buy their power. ~d this - will create billions of dollars m new business for . companies such as Eastern Pacific· Energy in Brea, where Tony Wayne ~orks. . As Wayne noted: 'Everyone m f . California is a potential custQmer." , The em~gence of a new power ; . market echoes what happened · when the long distance telephone · market was deregulated a decade , . ago. Suddenly a basic service. that required little thought becomes a major choice for consumers-and one that can lead to significant savings. · . · Wayile was wooing Lubin be- cause of Lewis Homes' extensive holdings in apartments, retail cen- ters and industrial buildings where common areas-laundries, parking lots and so on-use $1 million worth of electricity a year. Wayne was only the latest salesman to promise Lubin to shave big bucks off his monthly Soutliern California Edison bill. · Lubin represents only a tiny frac- tion of the market up for grabs. National retail cbaiDS, manuf1:c- turers, breweries and the Univermty of California system all are ''pursu· · tng price quotations," said Mark L ·Shunk. vice president of Energy Pacific, a 'power marketing venture set up by· Southern California Gas and San Diego Gas & Electric. Cities from Long Beach to Davis are considering bids . from energy providers to power their municipal buildings. Wayne Is also one of many bidders on the Long Beach contract. · California First . to Deregulate l r A. ll that business-and Califor-' nia's importance as a proving ground for power marketers as the rest of the nation deregulates-is attracting the biggest energy com- panies and utilities in the nation. Enron of Houston, Southern Co. of Atlanta, Dlinova near Chicago, ~ PacifiCorp. of Portland and . Duke i Power of North Carolina are here, ~­ .as are smaller companies such as , Green Mountain Energy of Ver-i mont, a green energy retailer. Most ~ have opened offices in California . and unleashed hundreds of sales-L people who, like ·wayne, have one E ·goal in mind: stealing customers . away from the utilities. f- Emon alone now has 300 em-l ployees in California, a "big chunk" ~ of whom are salespeople, an execu .. · tive said. Wayne's Eastern Pacific Energy, a relative small fry, has a - sales force numbering more than 60. ; Smaller companies without the . resources to send out salespeople r ·or buy expensive air time and. ; ·advertising space plan to ~e the Lf : Internet and mailing lists to reach· what the marketers call "affinity ~ groups" of consumers-those with : shared interests or political beliefs. f ~ "We're going after ordinary folk : who want their electricity pur- . chases to refiect their values," said i John Schaefer, president of Clean : ·Power Works, a Santa Cruz-based ' . company that is selling geother- . mal, wind and solar power. --Altogether, more thari 75 com- panies have registered to -market t · power in the state. After Labor \ . Day, many will launch mass media • • campaigns targeting residential 1 customers. f Their opportunities flow from the promise of cheaper energy in a state where residents generally piy 50% more than the national average for electricity because of the utilities' heavy reliance on high-priced nuclear and alterna-. ttve energy. . . ! · California utilities are not stand-1 .Ing by idly. They are trying tena- ·ciously to bang on to~~ custom-· era-while slugging it out with ·Wayne and other newcomers for . .. . I ·' business outside thei? traditional Those power market mechanics service areas. F.ach utility has are so important that Wayne, Gib- formed" a power marketing subsidi-son and other members of his staff ary to do ju&t that. now spend 25% of their time in San Many companies, including -· Francisco, lobbying the state Public Wayne's, have formed alliances. His Utilities Commission and duking it Eastern Pacific Energy, largely a _ ., out with the utilities, each side sales and service operation, is part-· striving for advantage in a market nering with an affiliate of Washing-set to open in less than five months. ton Water Power, one of the lowest-. · · For example Wayne's company cost generators in the nation. The and other power marketers are ~ affiliate will ship hydroelec:-. _ . fighting a ~tility proposal to charge triC power to Wayne's California · consumers-up to $15 to switch over customers from the Northwest via to outside providers. They also --theinterstatepowergrtd. --· oppose the utilities' proposal to The low cost of that hydropower : limit the number of accounts they . J and a five-year commitment from ~ will switch over to outside power I WWP to supply · him with 300. • peddlers to a combined 28,000 per , megawatts of power-enough to I month statewide. · light 300,000 homes-gives Wayne : The power marketers oppose the a good chance of beating the price limits and fees because they be- • of energy that will be sold over . lieve they will discourage people California's soon-to-be-created from switching from the utilities. Power Exchange. That's the pool They argue that transfers can be for energy generated by PG&E made electronically and should not .Edison and SDG&E whose bench~ incur a charge. With 12 million mark will be set largely by more metered accounts in the state, the costly fossil fuels. · limit on transfers could cause long The first brass ring went to 4ielays and customer frustration. Arizol)a Public Service, which "At that rate, it will take 10 : claims to have made the first retail years to get all the customers : delivery of electricity in California, switched Why spend any money supplying aerospace manufactW'el' advertising? It's like sending an Aerojet of Rancho Cordova with invitation to the party and no one · 20% of Its power starUng July 29 can get through the door," said Lou That delivery was possible· becau00 · Pai, chief executive of Enron En- ; ~cramento Municipal Utility Dis-. erp Services. . · trict decided to give some of its , 'We need to make sure restden-J customers "direct access" or free I tial customers don't get stuck·in ·a · -choice on July l, six months in J queue for months on end . . . given l advance of the three investor- 1 our expectations for customer ex-owned utilities. citement about electricity choice," . (Last summer's law covered said Julie Blunden, the San Fran- . only investor-owned utilities cisco-based regional director for leaving it up to the state's munici: 1 Green Mountain Energy Resomces. pal utilities to decide when and if to ' Homeowners, by and large, have open up their customers to outside not yet felt the marketing push, but · power suppliers. Los Angeles De-. big businesses statewide have been partment of Water and Power says hearing sales pitches such as ~ its 1.3 million custOmers will not be Wayne's for months. That's be- .! able to choose providers on Jan. 1 cause most power marketers would · but will be able to at some unspecl: prefer to grab the high volume j~ lied date.) . .. accounts of industry and big Wayne is doing more than sell- • 1 ing: He is helping invent the power market as he goes. While Wayne pitched Lubin, his associate Betsy Gibson was in San Francisco talk- ing up state regulators and other power marketers, trying to hash out a myriad of details, from com- puter language ·to billing cycles -· that will determine how the power market will be implemented. ~ ~ ~o\4- The eneration rtion of a t !-business. And because selling resi-cal mon ec c represents dent.ial customers will be more . ut e • e time-consuming and\ess profitable. l re8t o wis omes ayment Other companies say they are . wo go to pay fixed staying away from the homeowner costs, sucn as power delivery, cus- market because they can't convert tomer service and debts related to them with a Dip of a switch as ts nuclear and attematlve energy. done with long distance telephone . Wayne tOld Liibin liOW the free accounts. Wayne and other power ,power market will operate, how new marketers need signed col)tracts state agencies will .regulate pooling from new customers. . and delivery.of energy, and so on. Wayne said selling power to · But Lubin still had ·a difficult '. individual homeowners makes the 1 time grasping the market and most sense when residents can asked a succession of questions: somehow be approached in groups, "How will I know rm getting the ·such as apartment residents and lowest price? Whom do I call if mobile home park dwellers. there's a problem? How much will I ; Lubin and Lewis Hoines were save and how do I know rm getting attractive prospects to Wayne in the lowest price for energy?" part because he hoped_Lubin would . He added: "I! this is W be ! · give him permission to market guesswork, rm not in Tn energy. to tenants of 2,000 apart-~make a decision I need facts . ment units that Lewis Homes ; m front of me." Lubin complained I. owns.· . · ; that other companies had not been 1 1 able to quote him specific prices. Pitch Complicated \ · Wahl!e told Lubin he could not , . • • ~ ee hiDi a sPeCific pnce, that bv Uncertainties · no one could because energy prices I " · '. fiucfuate and the Statewide Power Just explaining the power market · Exchingm the commOdity ¥£:1 that · to prospects, even sophisticated j will set e &enchriiirk p ~ce that · customers such as Lubin, is a marlteters Will compete against, : compUcated job, one that Wayne I bas not been set up xet. hopes will be simplified next month I But Wayne promised Lubin when utilities begin an $87-mlllion something he liked: a formula by · education program-paid for by which Lewis Homes would receive ratepayers-to explain the choices. i 70% of all energy savings from what I In fact, much of Wayne's pres-I F.cDson Charged him, with Wayne's . entation to Lubin was a primer in t F.astem Pacific Energy receiving ! Deregulation 101. He explained . ! 30%. The worst case for Lubin . ~ that the choices that Lubin and I would be to pay the same price for ~ other Californians make on their energy he now pays to Fmson, '. PQWer B\lDj)lier Will iffect6i1'y which Wayne promised t.o match. abOut o&i?uarter of their -"If we don't save you money, we the raw of power generatlOn. don't make any money," Wayne . He reminded Lubm that even if I told Lubin, who responded that ; he decided to buy power from Wayne's deal was .. the most con- . Wayne's company, he would con-: creteproposalwe'vereceived." • tinue to be billed by Edison, which ! Stepping out of Lubin's office will simply pay Eastern Pacific and into the sweltering Upland -Energy its generation portion, just aftemoon, Wayne exuded confi- , as Pacific Bell pays long distance dence that he was .close to a sale. telephone companies out of what it He had led Lubin through a mine- . collects. ' field of murky market issues and · pesky competitors and nudged him toward a deal. '1t's nice being the smartest guy at the table. I always feel that way after a presentation," Wayne said. On Monday, five· days after Wayne's presentation, Lubin . agreed to a five-year contract. . 97-12 A Legal Newsletter from Foley Lardner Weissburg & Aronson AUG. 15, 1997 The governing body of a public entity must explain, in the minutes of the pertinent meeting, its rea- sons for invoking the so called "rule of necessity". This rule allows a public official with an actual or potential conflict of inter- est on a particular matter to vote on that matter if the lack of his or her vote would prevent the govern- ing body from taking action. However, under the Political Reform Act. ("Act"), a governing body may only invoke the rule of necessity_ (without violating the Act) when that particular public official's participation is "legally re- quired for the action or decision to be made." Regulations adopted under the Act. require a public official who has a financial interest in a govern- ing body's decision to follow a spe- cific disclosure procedure in order to participate in the decision. The regulations also prescribe that the official must "disclose as a matter of official public record" the exis- tence of the financial interest, •describe with particularity" the nature of the interest, and state why no alternative source of decision making exists {the •Disclosure"). In Michael George Kunec v. Brea Redevelopment Agency, the court interpreted these disclosure requirements to require the govern- ing body to specify in the minutes PUBLIC AGENCY'S GOVERNING BODY MUST EXPLAIN REASONS FOR INVOKING "RULE OF NECESSITY" of the applicable meeting the reasons for invoking the rule of necessity. Because the agency failed to do so, its decision to condemn certain prop- erty as part of a redevelopment project was invalidated. 01997 Foley Lardner Weissburg & Aronson. Reprod~on Ylith amibution pe~ In this matter, two members of the agency's five member govern- ing body had financial interests which could have been affected by ·a decision to condemn the prop- erty. Because the statute autho- rizing condemnation required four affirmative votes, the governing body could not act without the participation of an additional member. By invoking the rule of necessity the agency sought to rehabilitate at least one mem- ber and act to condemn the property. Both the trial court and the appellate court held that the agen- cy's action was invalid. In particu- lar, the appellate court, in review- ing the agency's minutes, found that the disclosure in the minutes was inadequate. The minutes stated that the vote was preceded by a process to "legally invest" a board member with the power to participate, recognizing the mem- ber's conflict of interest. The interest was described in the min- utes as property ownership "with- in 300 feet of the perimeter of the [redevelopment] project." This description was found insufficient because it did not clearly disclose the nature of the financial interest, but the court declined to indicate how the disclosure could have been adequately made. In addi- tion, the court stated that the minutes did not explain why there was no alternative source of deci- sion making as required by the regulations. For example, the court stated that the minutes did not explain why this governing body was the only body able to reach a decision on the condem- nation proceeding. Since an official with a poten· tial conflict, as opposed to an actual conflict, is not exempt from the disclosure requirement, the appellate court also held that when the rule of necessity is invoked because of a potential conflict, the public has the same right to know and the same disclosure rules apply. When a public official is uncer- tain whether he or she has an actual or potential conflict of inter- est, he or she should consult with the agency's legal counsel, as well as his or her own legal counsel. The regulations mandating disclo- sure state that the official must comply with the disclosure require- ments. The official's own counsel should advise on the nature of the conflict of interest and the requisite disclosure in order to avoid a viola- tion of the Act. However, the agen- cy must ensure that (1) a complete disclosure is made before the time of its decision, and (2) its minutes reflect the Disclosure set forth above, otherwise it may face a legal chal- lenge that could render its action invalid. H you would like a copy of the Brea Redevelopment Agency deci- sion, or if you have any questions about the case or the Political Re- formAct, please contact Julie Ashby or Greg Moser in our San Diego office, or the member of the firm who normally handles your legal matters. 0 1997 Foley Lardner Weissburg & Aronson. Reproduction with attribution permitted. -~ 'i -~ i~ :5' u Ol~ ~ ~ ,...., .. 1r= Q--::. ~ g~ :. --- c i~ U) l~ ~~ 0 G> • E ~ as z • --L Reclaimed Waste Water May Ease State's Thirst • Recycling: Despite 'yuck' factor, the practice is on the rise. San Diego is at cutting edge of what backers see as wave of future: sending treated sewage back to the tap. By JILL LEOVY TIMES STAFF WRITER In an effort to help quench California's unending thirst, offi- cials are set to embark on unusual plans to turn treated sewage into drinking water. San Diego is preparing to pipe water from the local sewage treat- ment plant directly into the city's second-largest drinking water res- ervoir. Communities. in the South Bay and Livermore, Calif., have re- cently joined the Orange County Water District in approving the injection of treated waste water into underground supplies used for tap water. Water recovered from treated sewage has already become an integral part of the state's water supply. Despite high costs and worries over public squeamishness, the use of "recycled" water has increased about 30% in the last year. It is being used to make snow for ski areas, grow hay, make news- print and concrete, dye carpets, hose down landfills arid flll cooling towers in oil refineries. Water reclamation in some form has been going on for a long time. Irvine is the granddaddy of recla- mation in California, setting an as yet unrealized goal in the early 1960s of recycling all its sewage water for non-potable uses. The Irvine Ranch Water District is still a leader, recently introducing re- claimed water to office air- conditioning systems. In another innovation, the dis- trict recently created a special plumbing system that supplies re- cycled water to toilets and urinals in a 20-story lrvirie office tower . Irvine water officials also in- stalled an underground irrigation system at an elementary school playground that allows reclaimed water to be used. The system irrigates the grass but does not send any water to the surface, where it could come in contact with children. The Orange County Water Dis-. trict is now considering plans to expand its reclamation operation using treated waste water from the county's sanitation districts. The widespread use of waste water is not without doubters. En- vironmentalists and Newport Beach residents are fighting plans by Irvine Ranch to flush treated water through the San Joaquin Marsh and into Upper Newport Bay. Opponents fear the treated sewage will foul· the bay, a fear water officials say is groundless. Pleue see WATER, Al8 · .. ) -.~ t~ 4 CD 1ii 0 g co ~ c 0 1J "' .. !. ~ -0 CD E as z LOS ANGELES TIMES WATER Continued from A18 The city conducted focus groups to test monikers for the water, and ultimately chose "repurifted" over "recycled,'' which, it seems, left too much to the imagination. 0 utreach to community groups came next, with officials gin- gerly pointing out that the city's existing water source, drawn from the Colorado River, contains sewage that has been treated and dis-' charged by cities upriver, such as Las Vegas. Across the state, similar public relations efforts are underway, with water agencies gently seeking to tell the public that they are using a new source of water that's quite close to home. "All water has gone through countless other organisms before it gets to us,'' said Hartling. "Dino- saurs, fish, humans-some a lot more recently than we would like to think." "It's a delicate balance,'' said · Steve Kasower, water recycling specialist with the state Water Re- sources Board. "It's important the public understands this and doesn't get upset by fear-mongers .... But, dirty or clean, water is just molecules of Hp with stuff floating between them. Public acceptance for water recy- cling is not without precedent I n Northern Virginia, a sewage utility has been treating waste water so that it meets drinking water standards for 20 years and releasing it into the Occoquan Res- ervoir in an unusual project similar to what San Diego plans. No health problems have been reported. At the most ad11anced sewage treatment facilities today, utilities empl:>y reverse osmosis and micro- filters, devices that involve pressing water through microscopic mem- branes, similar to what is used at bottled water companies such as Arrowhead Water. Elsewhere in the state, environ- mental regulation has also spurred · new efforts at reclamation. San Jose is one example. The city is under pressure to reduce the sewage it dumps into South San Francisco Bay, not because the discharge is poisoning anything, but because it is so high quality that it is converting natural saltwater marshes into freshwater ones. "In effect, the water is too clean,'' said Steven Ritchie of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commis- -sion. With bullrushes springing up in the bay where pickleweed once grew, and pressure mounting to do something to help endangered saltwater species, it was only a matter of time before cities like San Jose came to view their sewage as an enticing supply of freshwater, Ritchie said San Jose now has a $140-million reclamation system under construc- tion that will deliver reclaimed wa- ter to parks, farms and industries in Silicon Valley, said Garcia, the city's environmental services director. Some areas are even using .re- claimed sewage water to upgrade the purity of their conventional water supplies. Monterey Regional Water Pollu- tion Control Agency will unveil a $75-million project next month that will free farmers from dependence on wells that have grown too salty. Since statewide more than three- quarters of urban water is used for things other than drinking, the most optimistic activists predict that someday 20%, or even 40%. would come from treated waste. "Toilet to.tap" is the phrase that they use to denote a futuristic urban environment in which treated waste water would be transferred directly to drinking water pipes. Such a system would require new technology to instantaneously de- tect germs in treated water. But some reclamation enthusiasts still see it as inevitable. The very thought seems to make Spath, of the state health depart- ment, uncomfortable. "The time for that is not now, I will tell you that," he said Even the strongest advocates sense that the quick turnover of water from sewers to faucets may be a bit too dicey to win wide public acceptance. "I forbid you to print this," said Orange County reclamation advo- cate and farmer Charles Peltzer, while expounding ideas for mixing reclaimed water into public drinking water. "The public isn't ready to hear it." Already, one water recycling plan has run afoul of the public: 'fhrEte years ago, the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District was forced to scale back a plan to replenish ground water with recy- cled water because Miller Brewing Co. voiced fears that the project might taint its nearby wells. Other attempts to gauge public reaction have shown conflicting re- sults. A few years ago in Denver, water agency officials conducted focus groups to find out how the public might feel about reusing waste water for drinking. They found to their surprise that many people would rather not think too much about where their water comes from. "They wanted us to just get on with it," said Jane Earle, of D?nver Water. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Date Subject ler '1ed ,,,,,,.;,r:H WATER: Use of Treated Sewage on Rise in State Continued from Al In a larger sense, critics say that the process is expensive and may make many water drinkers opt for the bottled variety or turn up their noses and say, "Yuckl" But Paul Gagliardo of San Di- ego's Metropolitan · Wastewater Department believes that his city is about to begin "pioneering a proc- ess . . . to get people comfortable with the idea of drinking treated sewage." California spews enough sewage into the ocean to meet a third to a half of the state's urban water needs, Gagliardo said. He is among a small group of zealots who dream of a future in which Californians drink sewage, processed to levels similar to bot- tled water. Those views are shared by cru- saders such as Santa Rosa organic farmer Lawrence Jaffe, who sells vegetables nourished with recy- cled water using the slogan, "Close the loop," and Bahman Sheikh, a San Francisco consultant who likes to make the point by gulping down a long, cool glass of tertiary efflu- ent "There is no reason to flush toilets with pure water from Mono Basin," Sheikh said. The surge tn water recycling has been propelled by improvements in technology, regulatory changes and a new crop of government subsidies for reclamation systems. Today, California uses more than 450,000 acre-feet of reclaimed wa- ter annually. That is equal to about one-and-a-half Castaic Lakes, or the water consumed by two-thirds of Los Angeles In a year. decided to convert waste into drink- ing water after court rulings forced the city to better treat its sewage to protect the ocean. The result is water similar to what most people would consider good for a swimming lake. Rather than dump that water back into the ocean, San Diego has designed a $150-million system to add another level of treatment, bring the water up to the quality of extra-pure tap water, and pump it to the city's San Vicente drinking water reservoir. The water will be mixed into imported water supplies, comprising up to 10% of the s.upply by 2001. "It's a very significant step," said Ken Weinberg, water resources supervisor for the San Diego County Water Authority. "We are creating a new source of water." The technology for recycled wa- ter has developed to where San Diego's water will supposedly be 10 times purer than tap water, Gagliar- do said. State health officials have already approved San Diego's plan, develop- ing a new set of guidelines for the purpose because none exist. The water will be fine to drink, they say. The only worry is breakdowns in the system, so duplicate safeguards have been built in, Spath said. So far, lhe project has been more controversial because of its high cost than because of health concerns. San Diego officials estimate that it will cost about $600 per acre-foot to produce drinking water from waslc waler, about 30% higher than the cost of purchasing water from the Metropolitan Water District. They acknowledge that figure is fuzzy, however, because it includes federal subsidies and is counted against current sewage treatment costs. And some San Diegans contend that it would be better spent on developing other water sources: "If you are willing to spend that kind of money, you could flood the city of San Diego," said Elmer Keen, a retired geographer and critic of the project. But supporters counter that the cost of recycled water, although expensive, is still far less than the cost of desalinating water or build- ing dams. "It's competitive in .my book when compared to other new sources," said Peter MacLaggan, executive director of the Water Reuse Assn. of California San Diego officials are keenly aware of how easily public percep-, lion of the project could go awry. "This issue," said one advocate, Dr. Rosemarie Marshall Johnson, "gets everybody in a very personal way." Please see WATER, Al9 ~ (..) -cc I-C/'J -CIJ CC!' Zz 0--a.. I-a.. ~::i -(.) Zc: <w (/)a.. ~~ Zw ::>~ Ow Oz w ~ z < cc 0 ~ Jl ::J UJ ~ s ~ & as CL c i UJ .. !. as CL -0 CD E as z Projects now under construction will soon boost usage another 20%, according to the California Water Resources Board. · For all that, reclaimed water is less than 2% of the water used yearly by farms and cities in Cali- fornia. But advocates predict that will change, and cite models such as Irvine Ranch, where nearly a quarter of the water comes from treated sewage. "It's like throwing money away if you just let this water go," said Jaffe, who spent his law school student loan to start an organic farm in the shadow of San Jose's treatment plant. where he grows vegetables using local compost and reclaimed water. People such as Jaffe are fond of pointing out that while the state's reliance on water from the Sierra Nevada and the Colorado River is coming under attack, recycled wa- ter is the one s'lurce in California that is growing. It is also drought-proof. And because reclaimed water is produced locally by cities, it is also largely politics-proof. "No one can take it away from us," said Earle Hartling, water reuse coordinator of the Sanitation Districts of Los An- geles. As a result, the uses of reclaimed water have multiplied so quickly that health officials have been scrambling to keep up. New regu- lations should be completed this year, said David Spath. chief of the division of drinking water with the state Department of Health Serv- ices. The rules are expected to soon eliminate one of the ironies of this emerging water supply: its classifi- cation as a hazardous waste. Until then, plant workers must fill out lengthy reports when they spill reclaimed water, even if it is drink- ing water quality. Despite the regulatory confusion, recycled water is being used in a number of ways. It has been proposed as a source of water to do laundry at San Quentin Prison. It is even being pumped under the sea floor {Jff Long Beach to keep the harbor area from sinking due to oil extraction. The oil compa- nies have used tap water for this purpose-enough to supply 20,000 people With water for a year-but are switching to reclaimed water. -:.- Throughout the state, independ-I ent sewer and water utilities are cooperating, and in the case of San Francisco, merging. Th~ir engineers are taking on dual roles, and con- verting acre-feet-the conventional measure of drinking water-to gal- lons per day-the conventional measure of sewage. In short, water agencies now see waste water as a resource and incorporate it into long-term supply plans. Once chiefly an issue of handling sewage, reclaimed water is 11moving over to the other side of the ledger," said Lou Garcia, director of environ- mental services for San Jose, which plans to divert nearly 40% of its sewage stream to water supplies in coming years. The West Basin Municipal Water District, which serves communities from West Hollywood to Palos Ver- des ~tes. has made water recy- cling the linchpin of its plan to cut dependence on imported water in half over the next 20 years, largely by converting the region's water- hungry oil refineries to recycled water. The purest of West Basin's recy- cled water is being injected into the ground to protect drinking water supplies from seeping seawater. The plan will simultaneously cut sewage discharge into the bay 25%. San Diego leads the state. Officials ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Date Subject L. I/. ---A ;ti 8/ts/11 'lei~·',~~°' 1,·me.s -LOS ANGELES TIMES • Pensioris Should Be Based on Bonuses Too,Justices Rule • Retirement: State Supreme Court decision in Ventura County c~ could increase payments up to 20% for employees who received extra pay for special skills. From Associated Prm SAN FRANCISCO-Thou- sands of county employees in California are entitled to higher pensions based on bonuses that they are paid for such things as education and special skills, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday. The unanimous ruling, in a Ven- tura County case, coul<l increase individual pensions 10% to 20% in some cases, said Stephen H. Silver, lawyer for the 700-member Deputy Sheriffs Assn .• which filed the lawsuit. The case will cost the county millions of dollars and affect future negotiations.over worker benefits, ·.· ' . because 11every benefit that is granted will be more expensive," said Assistant County Counsel Dennis Slivinski. He said the county has more than 5,000 em- ployees, not all of whom get the range of bonuses provided to sher- ifrs deputies. The ruling applies to the 20 counties covered by. the County ·Employees Retirement Law of 1937. A list was not immediately available, but Silver said Los An- geles County and most other Southern California counties were covered. Most of the state's other 38 counties are part of the Public Employees Retirement System, which already provides similar benefits. . The court said the Ventura County deputies were entitled to increased current or future pen- sions, but did not decide whether the other 19 counties would have to .raise the pensions they have al- ready calculated or would be af- fected only in the future. The pensions are determined by taking an employee's highest annual compensation and using a percentage that depends on re- tirement age and years of serv- ice. The issue in the case was whether the compensation in- cluded bonuses paid to some em- The deputies in the case re- ceived .extra pay for bilingual skills, uniform maintenance, rid- ing motorcycles, working as training officers, and for some holiday and vacation periods for which they chose cash Instead of time off. ployees. · A Superior Court judge and the 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled that those sums were not included in compensation for pension pµr- poses. They relied on a 1983 appel- late ruling that said compensation was the amount paid to all em- ployees in the same job. But the FRIDAY.AUGUST 15.1997 A21 .,~ state's high court said the 1983 ruling was wrong. Compensation is .. the average monthly pay, excluding overtime, received by the retiring em- ployee," sa~d the opinion by Jus- tice Marvin Baxter. He said it includes additional pay for spe- cial skills, experience and the other bonuses received by the deputies. In a partial setback for the employees, the court said the county's contribution to a deferred-compensation plan is not included in the pay level on which the pension is based. But Silver and Slivlnski said · those amounts were much iess I than the benefits awarded in the! ruling. .. The public policy question ls.. to what extent retirement ben- efits should be equivalent to ac-· tual salary-." said Sllvinski, the: county's lawyer. ..It's been the: interpretation of the (county) re-. tirement board since (the 1983! ruling) that retirement ls not. supposed to include all the cash· compensation that an employee receives. This opinion radic.ally1 changes that." That is a fair result, said Silver,, because "the whole Idea of a pen- sion is to maintain to a certain extent. what you're accustomed to live on." ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section L. a. Times Date Page Subject 1l13l'li Joi~ di~(' (t!.ea.J.0n ~ -................ £ FOUNTAIN VALLEY Mayor Is Reelected to Sanitation Post Mayor John J. Collins recently was reelected joint chairman of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. The districts serve 2.2 million Orange County residents with two treatment and disposal plants in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. A combined body of the county's nine sanitation boards operate the districts. Twenty- nine members from each of the boards meet regularly to discuss issues that affect the boards and county as a whole. A seven-year member, Collins represents District 2, which in- cludes Fountain Valley and Hun- tington Beach. -JOHN CAN ALIS CF.NARO MOLINA I Los Angeles Times Royden Eu and Jack Hsu hold their catch of the day from Santa Monica Bay, which this year is filled with game fish. . More Fish, Cleaner Water .. . , In Santa Monica Bay, 'Life Is Good' By ALAN ABRAHAMSON TIMES STAFF WRITER Chugging out of the Redondo Beach harbor well before dawn. the Sea Spray. 65 feet long. was packed to the gills with people chattering in intense excitement. Their wish: fish. The dish: the best "bite" in years in Santa Monica Bay. As the sturdy craft lumbered along. the huge industrial landmarks dotting the bay receded into the distance: the Hyperion sewage treatment facility, the Chevron refinery. the Southern California Edison generating plants. Skipper Jeff De Buys steered to one of his favorite spots and dropped anchor. Nearly 50 fishing lines shot out into the sparkling green sea. Zing! Nol even two minutes later. Jack Hsu. a 36-year-old Hacienda Heights engineer, roared oul a primitive battle cry as silvery line whizzed from his pole. The fish fought gamely. But Hsu reeled it in, a fat. 15-pound yellowtail, and shouted with glee: "Sashimi!" Santa Monica Bay is swimming this year with fish, particularly with exotic game fish such as barracuda. dorado. bonita, bluefin tuna and yellowtail. Experienced anglers say the fishing is the best in at least 15 years. Some proclaim it's the best in a generation or more. "It's just been phenomenal." said Philip Friedman. ·~ w~o runs the Torrance-based 976-TUN A fishing hotline. T he arrival of so many game fish in the bay is clearly an oceanographic anomaly tied to the condition known as El Nino. experts said. Yet the fish have stayed-a clear sign that the bay water is clean enough and there is enough food. primarily baitfish such as sardines, to keep them here. For those who still consider the bay a cesspool. who wouldn't even on a dare eat a fish taken from it. experts Please see BAY, B3 ' , ' ,\ ' i ' 1. · ..... BAY: 'Bite' Called the Best in Years Continued from Bl say water conditions have improved over the last decade. "From the standpoint of marine life in the bay, conditions are markedly improved," said Mark Gold, executive director of Heal the Bay, the Santa Monica-based environmental group. Yet environmentalists, inarine biologists and veteran dockhands caution that considerable work· remains, primarily protection from storm-drain run-off and the cleanup of historical accumulations underwater of the pesticide DDT. . Unlike bottom-feeding f1Sh that may pick at DDT-laden sediment and are decidedly off limits for dinner-for instance, the white croaker-game fish prey on smaller fish, not off the bottom. .. They are treats to eat, said Gold and others. "If anyone wants to drop any by at my house, I'd be glad to give them my address," Gold . said. .0 Luckily, some of my friends have been dropping off some yellowtail." A long with nature, which has provided warmer water, grand-scale cleanup and protection programs have meant cleaner water in the bay, experts said. ·In addition, sportfishing has been enhanced-for some species-by the absence since 1994 of gill-net fishing in near-coast waters. Among the massive cleanup efforts: the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project, approved in 1995. As part of the project, rules took effect last year that are designed to reduce the county's largest source of p(>llution, the toxic muck-pesticides, grease, oil and waste-that spills into storm drains. At the same time, a campaign was launched to educate the public about the dangers of dumping into drains. · This summer, the water in the bay has been cleaner in part because last year's dry winter meant less gunk ran out of storm drains. . However, the rains yet to come this winter will wash a toxic soup into the water, making the water quality hazardous and beaches "look like a land- . fill,'' Gold said. But, in the water, the ha?.ard is temporary, he and others said. · "Pollution is not keeping the [game fish] out of the bay,'' said Dan Pondella. an Occidental College marine biologist · and director of the Vantuna Research Group, which has monitored fJSh popula- tions iil the bay since the 1970s. Toxicity, he and others said, is typically evident in underwater sediment and in bottom-feeding fish such as the white croaker, also known as the kingfish. , hard for some environmentalists, scientists and fishers to convince others that the bay is actually showing signs of health. According to the county's Department of Health Services, there were 12 beach closures in 1987; so far in 1997, there have been only two, and one of those, ori Jan. 30, was due not to the typical cause, a sewage ·pumping station malfunction, but to a landslide that caused a break in a sewer line. Another sign: Toxic metals discharges from local waste water treatment plants, including the Hy- perio~ plant, decreased 80% to 90% ·from 1982 to · 1994, according to the Restoration Project and the ·Westminster-based Southern California Coastal '.Waters Research Project Other signs include significant kelp growth in . test beds and a resurgence in the bay's resident sea lion population, from about 150 animals a decade ago to more than 700, said Terry Tamminen, who runs the environmental group Santa Monica Bay- Ke'eper. · Tamminen, like many others, emphasized that , much work remains. However, he said, "there is · evidence that things are getting better." Karen Caesar, a Restoration Project spokes- woman, added: "There is more than just a glimmer of hope for the bay." . For instance, the .. bite,'' as anglers call it, began in earnest in the spring. There has been almost no letup since. The fISh arrived from Mexico, driven north by a complex mix of climate and ocean forces tied to a potent El Nino in the equ;ltorial Pacific, said Tim Barnett, a researcher at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Joll~ I n June, the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper in the South Bay, began reporting big fish hauls from the Redondo pier. Last month, the tales · became . whoppers: One boat captain, the paper reported, gleefully "worked overtime to filet one of the 162 yellowtail" caught that day. . "It's like they say it was in the 1930s," said Eric Hobday, 31, the Sea Spray's veteran deckhand. "The bass are biting. The yellowtail are biting. The barracuda-biting." Bill Beebe, 70, who has been writing outdoors columns for area newspapers for 45 years, said it's not quite like it used to be in the old days-though he did say that it is "better than it has been." Beebe said he recalls fJShing 50. years ago for · halibut in the morning, then albacore tuna in the afternoon. Forty years ago, he said, he could catch · 100 or more white sea bass in a single nighl "I can tell you, this doesn't hold a candle to that," he said. Commercial catch of the white croaker has been Nonetheless, it's pretty dam good. One day's illegal since 1990 in the near-shore waters of catch on the Sea Spray totaled 26 yellowtail, 57 the Palos Verdes shelf, where about 100 tons of barracuda, 35 bass and 11 bonita. "We caught 26 DDT sprawls across an area roughly the size of the but we probably lost 50," skipper DeBuys said. city of Pasadena. "Fish running into rocks. Wily fish." In June, a study released by Heal the Bay found As the boat rocked in the harbor, deckhand that contaminated white croaker was sWl for sale Hobday cleaned Hsu's decidedly unwily fish, then in Los Angeles and Orange County markets; 84% the nine that Hsu's buddy, Royden Eu, 34, a of 132 samples exceeded the amount of DDT that · Rowland Heights stockbroker, had reeled in-four state health officials say poses an acceptable cancer yellowtail, two barracuda, two bonita and a bass. risk .. The worst of the fJSh were too polluted to be Soy sauce and wasabi for the yellowtail, green . used legally as landfill. ,., onions and a steaming pot for the other fish, Eu Most of the white croaker were probably caught proclaimed. off the Palos Verdes shelf or Los Angeles Harbor in "Life is good!" someone called out from the or near the state's "no-take" wne. Releasing the docks. report, Gold said the rule is poorly enforced. Hsu responded with a thumbs-up sign and a big It's that kind of horror story that makes it so smile. He said, "Very good! Very good fish!" . I • The Bay Is His Baby, and He's a Fierce Guardian By JOHN M. GLIONNA TIMES STAFF WRITER Rimm Fay rises with the fishes. By dawn most mornings. he a lready has a couple of cups of coffee down his gullet as he shoves off in his 24-foot trawler, preparing for yet another exploratory dive beneath his beloved and beleaguered Santa Monica Bay. For decades it has been this way: a sometimes stubborn, always idealistic marine biologist continuing his life of intimate contact with the sea. Four times a week. the 68-year-old Fay dons his scuba gear to wander the ocean floor off the Malibu coast, harvesting marine specimens for biomedical laboratories around the world. Since the 1950s. his Pacific Bio-Marine Labs has sent lobsters to Australia, South Korea and Japan. He has sent horn sharks caught by hand to a Minnesota zoological park. starfish to Columbia and Harvard. and sea urchins to CLARENCE WILLIAMS I Los Angeles 'J'lmes Rimm Fay is a curious mix of scientist and gadfly, fisherman and no-nonsense environmentalist. Santa Monica College so students could study their evolution. His specimens have been used to study human nerve cell damage as well as to develop weapons against various tumors and to concoct a nonaddictive pain reliever stronger than morphine. Fay, a Santa Monica native and former state coastal Please see FAY, B3 t' r I· ; FAY: Determined Defender of the Bay Continued from 81 commissioner, knows the contributions his marine creatures are making to mankind. But he questions what favors man has done them and their ecosys- tem in return. Despite some signs in recent years of improvementin the health of the bay, he remains a prodding voice against what he sees as mistreat-. ment of the waters. "They've dumped everything in this bay except radioactive waste," he complains. To meet Rimmon Fay is to see a crusty old·sailor whose ruddy skin and reddened eyes suggest someone who has logged too many sea miles under the sun. He's a curious mix of scientist and gadfly, f1Sherrnan and no-nonsense environmentalist. For years, he bas carried his love for the California coast like Don Quixote's lance and shield. To local f1Shernien, fellow biologists, develOpers and politicians, he's an unapologetic guardian of the bay. Others see him as merely a crotchety dreamer and a fool, a man who exaggerates the plight of the bay, or as one city official put it, "a well-meaning eccentric." · Other envirQnmentalists are more heartened by the progress in cleaning up the bay. "The bay in a lot of areas, like 'storrn~drain . ·pollution, still has major problems,'' said Mark Gold, an environmental scientist and head of Santa Monica-based Heal the Bay. "But we have made remarkable progress in the last 10 to 20 years in pollutant reduction from sewage treatment plants and from industrial waste sources." Don't try telling that to Fay. In conversations, he lunges irrepressibly at windmills. Big industrial polluters, government sanitation departments, the Environmental Protection Agency, even the Coastal Commission on which he once served-all of them. he complains, have failed to protect his bay. Fay gets an audience for these convictions because he has spent as much time on the bottom of Santa Monica Bay as anyone. A former lifeguard, he began diving Qff Malibu in 1955, collecting specimens for professors at UCLA and USC, where he did his postdoctoral research attempting to find the cause of death and mutation of great quantities of marine life in the bay. ; Forty years ago, Fay's bay was polluted. Today,· he stands along the docks of Marina del Rey and looks down. "This isn't tropical water," he says. "It's Santa Monica Bay water-off-color, sort of brownish. There's suspended matter in il" It embitters him that Los Angeles is better known as an industrial county than a great fishing port. He recalls ruefully how, in the 19308, heavy industry began discharging hundreds of pounds of effiuent a day into the sewer lines that emptied into the bay. Bow harmful chemicals, including DDT, killed off f1Sh, spoiling a vibrant industry. How the cause of the poisoning was finally traced to a Montrose chemical plant in the late 1960s, a time when DDT concentrations in Santa Monica Bay f1Sh had grown so high the fISh could not be exported. "As far as anyone is concerned, the ocean is here for our amusement and recreation, not sustaining life. It's not important to people. But to me, it's my life," Fay says. He contends that drawing-board projects like the Playa Vista housing and studio mega-develop- ment near Marina del Rey would mean an avalanche of fresh-water runoff into the bay's fragile salt water habitats. Some other environ- mentalists are also concerned, but are withholding their judgment until.the developer's final plans are in. John Crosse, assistant director of the ~ Angeles city bureau of sanitation, takes issue with Fay's charges of government irresponsibility. "Our marine biologists think the bay is recover- ing · quite well as to where we were in ·the mid-1980s," he said "Back then, we were dis-· charging fiye times as ·much waste. There were . impacts to marine life around our outfalls. "We cleaned up our act in 1989 and have made some dramatic improvements to the ocean bottom around our outfalls,'' lte said. "We've been meeting Environmental Protection Agency standards for treated waste since 1989 and don't see any long-term damage to the health of Santa Monica Bay." . . -: Fay's battle involves not just the bay, but also the diminishing coastal wetlands suc'1 as the Ballona Wetlands below the Westchester bluffs. f. > f . Nearly gone, he says, are the flat shallow marshes around Santa Monica Bay that provide a healthy habitat for baby fish and migrating birds along the ~ coastal flyway. · ' These were the issues Fay championed during t his six years as a coastal commissioner, until he .1. . was replaced by .a developer in 1979 after state legislators decided that he had antagonized too · many people. "I let people know [that] the most important use t of our ocean, other than development, always has i 13een and always will be the receipt of our waste. · ,. Waste compromises all other uses. And that's what !: they called offending people," Fay says. ~ · After his Coastal Commission stint ended, Fay ;. largely washed his hands of politics and returned to the sea, harvesting specimens and providing his · PXpertise to environmental causes where needed. But he continues to attend meetings on water · quality control and to weigh in with his opinions- and continues to be frustrated at his difficulty in · turning people's attention to pollution. · · "When it comes to talking about this bay, I might as well be mute and people might as well be deaf and dumb, especially 1>9liticians,'' he says. Dan Frumkes, director of the conservation network for the American Sports Fishing Assn., sees Fay as a rare antidote to people who are "only .concerned about what they can see-birds and mammals. Everything else is out of sight, out of mind. But Rimm has made a life of making them· look at the sea, to see how we've been mismanag- ing and over-exploiting." · Adds Dorothy Green, founder of Heal the Bay: "Rimm is one of my favorite characters, someone right out of Steinbeck's •eannery Row.' He feels it's his ocean you're messing with." And being on that water is Fay's therapy, where he finds solitude and peace. He can't conceive of hanging up his scuba gear. · "I can't retire," he says. "There's too much I have to do." Public Banned at Scehlc Waterway in Marylai;id as Fish Kill Pers~ts . ( -.--.. . . From the W,ashington Post SHELLTOWN, Md.-As a mas- sive fISh kill continued in the Pocomoke River on Maryland's Eastern Shore on Thursday, offi- cials indefinitely banned the public from a nearly five-mile stretch of the scenic waterway. The state Department of Natural Resources sent a team of scientists to the Pocomoke, where they gathered water, mud and flSh sam- ples for analysis. . The fish kill, which began Wednesday, destroyed thousands of menhaden, roekfish, croakers and blue crabs and marked a dramatic escalation of problems on the Pocomoke that began last fall, when local watermen began re- porting gaping red sores on fISh. Officials . have not determined the cause of the fish lesions but are following procedures developed by North Carolina researchers to test for Pfiesteria piscicida, an obscure microorganism that eventually was pinpointed as the cause of massive fish kills in that state. With ·water samples taken Wednesday from the Pocomoke, . officials said they hope to have some preliminary indications by today whether Pfiesteria is respon- sible for the lesions and the dead fJSh. : After conferring with·~ state health and environment officials, Somerset County Health Qfficer Curtis Dickson cfosed the Poco- moke River because of a potential health threat to humans and be- cause people were not heeding the advisory to stay away from the water. · Pfiesteria, a single-·cell ·micro- organism, moves through 2• stages and is harmful to fish .in several of those stages. Scientists don't fully understand how Pfiesteria in an . unharmful state becomes danger- ous, but they know that it thrives in water polluted with nutrients, such as nitrogen, which can wash off farm fields or be emitted by sewage-treatment plants. 9-P-Y'7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page. Date Subject / 5 1/2~{17 Huntington Beach holds .offon sewer maintenance fee . . \ . . ~ • City officials decid~ to · investigate the proposal .i'- and form a task force for · resident ~put.: : ·; ·. ~ .. : By Tim Grenda, Independent HUNTINGTON BEACH - City officials have ·dropped the;•. idea of charging residents a ... : monthly fee to pay for j.mprove:, ments ,to the city's µumbllng · ... ~ sewer system -at least for the near future. . · · Two weeks ago, City ·, ... , ·.: .. Administrator Mike Uberuaga proposed instituting a new Sewer Maintenance Fee '. Program that would collect between $3.39 and $7.36 a month from every property ·· owner in the city. '· ·.' -1 The amount of the fee,· ·· 1·· · which would be the same for · everyone, would depend on .. ,-. how much of the multi-million : dollar problem officials wan~ to \ fix. A tee of $3.39 would raise· ·- enough money to covf!r only · ..... some of the repairs, while_the.,!i' maximum charge of $7.36 .(.:-. would mean officials"could : · mend most of the city's sewer • problems. City staff had recommended implementing the $3.39 per · month fee. , · ' • I • input on how best to structure such a program. . "I most certainly support the : sewer fee,• Uberuaga said. "But the reason I changed my recommendation is the irnpor-· ·· tance of the public supporting · . the tee . ." .1 ·• , .. ; .• , . . . , . ,_.~ ... BefQre ariy sewe~' mainte:;:,'.·~., : nance fee j.s imposed, the City ; CoUlldl agreed to form a task · > ~t.."'*l.lt.:u.~~-· force comprised 'of representa-:'; . ·i~t.abo~t ·~~iY~"u~:;~~! .. ,'., ·good.1de6ut'il~.'5U~g~t~'.ii~~; : :;:~P~f ;:~r;:~~=~::'Point-. that the city's infras~cture --· the cotindl hold off1pn their ~;i;,.. ed by the council. will be to design and imple- ment a public awareness pro- gram to inform residents of the need for sewer improvements. Officials hope once the public knows the seriousness of the problem, residents will be more likely to liUpport paying a fee for repairs. Resident Ed Peierabend said city officials better implement some sort of remedy to fix the sewers soon, before ·the entire system "fails completely . "Pretty soon,• Feierabend said, •we'll have porta-potties. • including .miles of underground.: deciSion and first collect public .. The goal of the task force ..... sew!'!T lines, water PUI!lP sta,, '· L . . . ...J.. -----....,.,_,.,.,..,,__,==""""--------~~~--- tions and· storm drains -is in : bad shape and literally crum~ J .bling after decades of neglect.; Huge breaks and cracks in · the sewers all over the city allow untreated wastewater to" pour rlght into the· ground, cre- ating a serious public health issue, officials said. .. . Recently, the council saw · video of the extensive under-' ground damage taken with a · ·. remote-controlled camera that city crews use ~o survey the sewers .. :· ... · But cin Monday night, the· council unanimously agreed to table the idea and investigate the issue some more. Uberuaga said he still feels the sewer fee program is a · , ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE 2.2- :~:·· -.... , .. : .... --· ......... . ·World's· sanitatiOn · . . • .-:-~r,. seen as worsen1_,g . . ~ ........ . The New York Times . . . . · · ~ ....... ~. . ~·-·· UNITED NATIONS-Neariy 311il1r6fl people -more than half the world's p~ ulation -do not have access to eve& a minimally sanitary toilet, UNICEF sfli'1 in a report Tuesday, adding that tlii$ lack of basic hygiene contributes signifi:: cantly to the spread of new plagues,.tli~ resurgence of old diseases and -the deaths of 2.2 million children a year) .t. : Sanitation statistics are among thtise getting worse woi'ldwide, said ·the·~ port. Since 1990, about 300 million pecijn~ have been added to populations witli'ol:'t- sanitation. : ., · ' .. !ti": UNICEF's annual Progress of NatibWi· survey found that Brazil, Haiti, Camb~ · dia, China, India, Afghanistan, Egypt1, ~ Congo and Senegal are among the col.In-· tries where less than half the population, have acceptable sanitation. . ., •. ;. ••.•• Other countries have done much. bet.a: ·te.r, though not necessarily because. the~· are richer. 'Among .the developing:iia.a·. tions with standards equivalent to those~ of industrial couµtries are. Malaysia\· Thailand, the Philippines, Iran, Jor<fan.t; Saudi Arabia, Jamaica, Trinidad_4fl'd Tobago, and nearly all of Central Ameritt• ca except Nicaragua. · . ..~ .. ~ In a separate survey within the .Pm.· · gress of.NJltions report, UNICEF tonf eluded that' AIDS could wipe out mostt>f · the gains made in reducing infant·.anci child mortality in the developing cdflfl- tries in recent years. .:.:; ··-~ · SUBJECT \ NAME OF PAPER ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS SECTION PAGE DATE SUBJECT 7 11 17 What America needs is a 3.5-gallon flush :I f you call yourself an Amer-~: ican, you need to know about a crucial issue that is ~· now confronting the U.S. :r Congress (motto: "Re- Jllaining Firmly In Office Since p98"). This is an issue that af- fects every American, regard- ,less of race or gender or religion or briefs or boxers; this is an issue that is fundamental to the whole entire Cherished Ameri- can Way of Life. This issue is toilets. ~ I'm talking about the toilets ·now being manufactured for ·home use. They stink. Literally. -You have to flush them two or :three times to get the job done. It has become very embarrassing :to be a guest at a party in a newer Jiome, because if you need to use . the toilet, you then have to lurk in tJle bathroom for what seems (to you) like several presidential ad- ministrations, flushing, check- 'ihg, waiting, flushing, checking, while the other guests are whis- ·pering: "What is (your name) 'DOING in there? The laundry?" '.': I know this because I live in a home with three new toilets, and I estimate that I spend 23 percent .~ my waking hours flushing them. This is going on all over f,merica, and it's causing a seri- ·ous loss in national productivity that could really hurt us as we try to compete in the global econ- omy against nations such as Ja- pan, where top commode scien- -tists are developing super-effi- cient, totally automated household models so high-tech that they make the space shuttle look like a doorstop. :· The weird thing is, the old DAVE BARRY American toilets flushed just fine. So why did we change? What force would cause an entire nation to do something so stupid? Here's a hint: It's the same force that from time to time gets a bee in its gigantic federal bonnet and decides to spend millions of dol- lars on some scheme to convert us all to the metric system, or give us all Swine Flu shots, or outlaw tricycles, or whatever. You guessed it! Our govern- ment! What happened was, in 1992, Congress passed the Energy Pol- icy and Conservation Act, which declared that, to save water, all U.S. consumer toilets would henceforth use 1.6 gallons of wa- ter per flush. That is WAY less water than was used by the older 3.5-gallon models -the toilets that made this nation great; the toilets that our Founding Fathers fought and died for -which are now prohibited for new installa- tions. The public was not consult- ed about the toilet change, of course; the public has to go to work, so it never gets consulted about anything going on in Wash- ington. But it's the public that has been stuck with these new toilets, which are saving water by re- quiring everybody to flush them enough times to drain Lake Erie on an hourly basis. The new toi- lets are so bad that there is now -I am not making this up -a black market in 3.5-gallon toi- lets. People are sneaking them into new homes, despite the fact that the Energy Policy and Con- servation Act provides for -I am not making thi~ up, either - a $2,500 fine for procuring and installing an illegal toilet. I checked this out with my lo- cal plumber, who told me that people are always asking him for 3.5-gallon toilets, but he refuses to provide them, because of the law. The irony is that I live in Miami; you can buy drugs here simply by opening your front door and yelling: "Hey! I need some crack!" Here's another irony: The fed- eral toilet law is administered by the U.S. Department of Energy. According to a Washington Post article sent in by many alert readers, the DOE recently had to close several men's rooms in the Forrestall Building because -I am STILL not making this up - overpressurized air in the plumbing lines was CAUSING URINALS TO EXPLODE. That's correct: These people are operating the Urinals of Death, and they're threatening to fine us if we procure working toilets. The-public -and this is why I love this nation -is not taking this sitting down. There has been a grass-roots campaign, led by commode activists, to change the toilet law, and a bill that would do that (H.R. 859 -The Plumbing Standards Act) has been introduced in Congress by Rep. Joe Knollenberg of Michi- gan. I talked to Rep. Knollen- berg's press secretary, Frank Maisano, who told me that the public response has been very positive. But the bill has two strikes against it: 1. It makes sense. 2. People want it. These are huge liabilities in Washington. The toilet bill will probably face lengthy hearings and organized opposition from paid lobbyists; for all we know it will get linked to Whitewater and wind up being investigated by up to four special prosecutors. So it may not be passed in your life- time. But I urge you to do what you can. Write to your congress- humans, and tell them you sup- port Rep. Knollenberg's bill. While you're at it, tell them you'd like to see a constitutional amendment stating that if any federal agency has so much spare time that it's regulating toilets, that agency will immedi- ately be eliminated, and its buildings will used for some ac- tivity that has some measurable public benefit, such as laser tag. So come on, America! This is your chance to make a differ- ence! Stand up to these morons! Join the movement! Speaking of which, I have to go flush. Dave Barry is a columnist for The Mi- ami Herald. His column appears Sat- urdays in Accent nJESDA Y. JUL y 29. 1997 A3 R ! Water Deal Spli!~ .: San Joaquin VaileY .. • Resources: MWD crafts plan for transfer from • southern district to urban use. Northern farmers, fearing .. effects on agriculture, join environmentalists in opposition~ ByMARKARAX TIMES STAFF WRITER ARVIN, Calif.-An elaborate deal to move San Joaquin River water from the farms of this heart- land to t'te suburbs of Los Angeles has eruJJt~d into California's ver- sion of a nasty civil war. It pits L.A.'s Metropolitan Water District and big farmers in the southern San Joaquin Valley on one side against farming giants to the north and Bay Area environ- mentalists. The south says the $45-million water transfer is a win-win, ben- efiting urban users in Southern California and fruit and vegetable growers in Kern County. The north say.s it won't abide any deal that allows a thirsty Southern Califor- nia to tap into yet another distant river vital to agriculture. It vows a Jong legal fight As · early as this week. federal officials were set to approve the transfer. shunting 350,000 acre- feet of San Joaquin River water over the mountains into Southern California during the next 25 years-enough water to slake the thirst of about 2.8 million people a year. Now the deal is on ice. perhaps permanently, while farmers and irrigation districts in the San Joa- quin Valley try to work out a truce. "Any time you propose a water transfer, you expect some contro- versy, but we frankly didn't antici- pate the opposition that's now coming at us." said Dirk Reed, the MWD engineer who helped nego- tiate the deal. "They see Southern California sitting here and they think we've got an unquenchable thirst, and we don't and that's what we're trying to tell them." Water transfers may be arcane instruments, but they are vital to Southern California's survival of future droughts and an increased population, according to MWD of- ficials. The water agency serves 16 million people from Ventura to San Diego and needs an additional 450,000 acre-feet by 2015 to meet a projected increase of 4 million cus- tomers. . With Los Angeles losing much of its Mono Lake water and its Colo- rado River supply threatened by a lawsuit, the region is naturally ogling the abundant irrigation wa- ter of the San Joaquin Valley. Like many farmers opposing water transfers. Kole Upton, a cotton and nut grower in Madera County, sees Los Angeles employ~ ing an old tactic to capture the water of a faraway river: dividing and conquering local farmers and irrigation districts by playing to the greed of a few. In a recent opinion column in the Fresno Bee, Upton all but accused the Arvin-Edison Water Storage District here of selling out to the· big hydra in the 213 area code. The ghost of the Owens Valley· case-Los Angeles' turn-of-the-· century water grab that milked dry: the fruit orchards of a distant plain. and turned a cabal of San Fernando Valley developers into rich men-. was not far away. 0 We're selling our future to L.A., because we're going to need this· water for our farms and our own. growing cities," Upton said. "This· isn't a one-year transfer of surplus: water. This is a 25-year commit- ment." In the five years since federal· reform paved the way for water marketing in California, only one minor deal has sent additional San. Please see WATER. A14 · t' WATER: Deal for Transfer Divides SanJoaquin Valley Continued from A3 Joaquin Valley farm water to Southern California. The last time MWD officials knocked on the door of this distant farm belt looking for water, they managed to insult Callfomia's agri- cultural giants and went home dry. The year was 1994 and the MWD had secretly inked a $5.6-million deal with one hard-luck dairy near Los Banos to buy 32,000 acre-feel When the sale became public, it generated so much heat from the farming community that the trans- fer never took place. It didn't help matters that one of the owners of the dairy-and the MWD's chief negotiating partner- was then-Assemblyman Rusty Ar- eias from urban San Jose. T wo years later, MWD execu- tives returned to this flaUand still licking their wounds. · This time, they bowed to all the rural niceties. They said they took care not to dangle millions of dollars in front of some desperate fanner. They dined at mom-and-pop res- taurants in Arvin and Delano and bartered long and hard with the local big hats. Rather than deal with Kem County farmers directly, the MWD decided it was better public rela- tions to bargain upfront with the Arvin-Edison Water Storage Dis- trict. which delivers San Joaquin River water to area farms. Instead of planting a spigot di- rectly into the river, the two sides said they came up with an innova- tive plan to bank enough water in wet years to serve both the farm- ing needs of Kem County and the urban needs of Southern California. With more than $20 million in infrastructure funds from the .. MWD, Arvin-Edison would con- struct wells and percolaUon ponds near Bakersfield that would store thousands of acre-feet of river water below ground. In dry years. when its draw or San Joaquin River water was cut, the irrigation· district would then have plenty of ground water to serve its carrot and grape growers. And it would have enough left over to ship an average of 14,000 acre-feet a year totheMWD. Unlike the dairy farm deal, this one wouldn't fallow any farmland, according to Arvin-Edison offi- cials. And the MWD, ever mindful of its past mistakes, was careful to let the irrigation districts that share the river with Arvin-·Edison know about the negotiations. But just as the deal was headed for Bureau of Reclamation ap- proval, growers in Fresno and Madera counties began mounting a vitriolic opposition. How could our brothers in the south valley sell water to Los Angeles when we in · the north are fallowing farmland in dry years? How can we be sure that the water you're sending south is really surplus, banked ·water? If you want to pursue a wet-year water banking system, why not come to us :ind keep it in the family? "If Arvin had come to the group and said we want to install millions of dollars worth of percolation basins for our future use, no one would have a problem," said Dick Moss of the Friant Water Users, have long struggled with dry-year cuts in their supply and that the deal with the MWD would mean a lot more certainty for farmers in Kem County. "We don't see this as chiefly a Metropolitan program. This is an Arvin program designed to regu- late our erratic supply.'' he said. Environmental groups have ' raised their own objections to the water transfer in letters to federal officials. They point out that the San Joaquin River-part of Cali- fornia's historic salmon run-has been listed as one of the 10 most abused rivers in America because so much of its flow is now diverted to agriculture. What water does make it downstream is polluted by pesticides and other farm runoff, studies show. "The San Joaquin River has been devastated by water diver- sions over the last 40 years," said Hal Candee of the Natural Re- sources Defense Council m San Francisco. "Adding 16 million wa- ter customers as additional divert- ers before we've done anything to address the river's environmental needs is a terrible mistake." which is made up of Arvin-Edison The war of words between and two dozen other irrigation farming interests in the south districts throughout the San Joa-and the north has sent the latter quin Valley. into a rare embrace with environ- "lt's only when the water goes mentalists. After weeks of recrimi- out of the region that we begin to · nations, rival farmers and irriga- have a problem." tion districts agreed last week to Opponents fear that once the . stop writing opinion page pieces MWD becomes a contracted user of and buying newspaper ads and to the San Joaquin River, agricul-· sit down and talk. ture's 98% draw of water will be In a show of good faith, Arvin- forever jeopardized. In times of Edison withdrew the water trans- drought, they point out, the needs fer from federal consideration. It of cities supersede the needs of says fellow irrigators should either farms. put up or shut up. If opponents Steve Collup, head of Arvin--won't help the district finance a Edison, believes that fear is greaUy similar water bank for Kern overstated. He .says opponents County farmers, Arvin-Edison of- have misrepresented the deal as a . ficials say, they will resubmit the diversion of river water. ''The only MWD deal for Bureau of Reclama- water we'll be sending to Los tion approval. Angeles is water from conserva-That could provoke a lengthy tion and banking. There is no net legal fight, pUWng on indefinite loss." hold the water Southern California . He said that district growers was counting on to sneak by in 1 future droughts. "I'm not going to cast MW' the evil villain. They're just tr to get a job done for their cu: ers,'' Moss said. "But our bo line is we don't want San Jos Valley water leaving the San quin Valley." .. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NATION WATCH: Name of Paper 0. C. If(_,) Where drinking water comes from ... a II . URBAN WATER CYCLE "''"w""'" . ~ rare commodity. Water covers more than 70% Section /l Page J Subject IJ II II any remaining ~ i! ~ of the Earth's ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ surface, but less Where used water goes ... than 1% of that m m is readily available for our use. Here's how water is cleaned for use in the home: Source: National G•ographic Soci•ty; Knight-Ridder Tribun• Water is disinfected with chlorine; chlorine is removed; water is recycled or discharged_ Into sea, rivers or onto· the ground. · Sludge settles and rs removed. m Remaining water is sent to an aeration tank, where oxygen- fed bacteria break u~wastes. m In another settling tank, smaller solids sink to the bottom and scum rises to the top. Both are removed. Gravel, seeds, etc .. fall to bottom of a settling tank. II . Coarse screen removes large solids, such as sticks, cans. ..... -~ The Earth's water .. (/ ~ ~ . ,, . .. .. , Water-saving tips ... While waiting for tap • water to warm up, save the running water for o~ ~ . \ ··'. ' · ... Use a small plastic tub to:: rinse fruits, vegetables, : then use the water from the tub to water plants. .. ... Turn off the water while you brush your teeth, sha~; or lat.her up in the sh~wert " ' . . . Good management is· no-management. . . . . 5.& /14L-<u> ~ ~1 · . . . -. J. ,, '· a, Ronald L V~~ ~ •• ' .. ...:.. . . . .. , ....... ~ -. 1. ·r ,.8 . .: ,.. ::: ::-~,-_. ~:~t·· . · ~Its time not addln1 value tor custom era .. · _will have simple, self.driven structures .11•• ~caao ~rwn.:.,,r:" \"'il:V~1?~~~9rp~~ · BQ ·1• -~~ ... · . Because or this -and other nl!gatlvea ·and controls. . . ;. ··"Manail~k-Wltilgut MinLli&lent~-li~f" UI ·ti\~ .. ~ · · · .. ! . ~the so-ealled Golden Age pf manage-Controls? Yes, controls. The end or sure to generate applause among the--._... ., REVIEW/'\'·.'·: . . .. · ment, which b~gan shortly after the management as we know It need '10t · lebelan masses wlio like to tack tho• . . . : · ~ . ....;.__ beginning or tlie Industrial revolution mean the end or control. ~heeky "Dilbert" eartoon• on walls of'' · · MANAGING~ MANAGEMENT, and peaked In the 1950s, will rapidly "The post-management corpdratlon their ~ompany eublcles. . •!·,. • ... . . • • . by Richard K~. , an Godden: Nlcholaa come to a close, the authors predict. will have authority and clear leader-: Its premise Is simple: Madagement as.· ·: . Brealav r.Ub~l~hfril,= .. · 8 pages. $25 What will replace all these redundant ship, but the control will be based on .. we know It has become lirelevant; It has·: , . . '· .. •.-:. , managers? En~repreneurs, say the Internal motivation and on results, . become an unnecessary and burilen· : Yea~; . ~ ''u t!lre probably saying. authors. Entrepreneurs who are part of rather th~n on external supervision by , some complexity, an end ltselhather . '. ;W~at are P~l\lt!11 suppos~d to do? large organizations. They, not managers, the boss, write the authors. . 1 than 8 legitimate means to the true end ' · Tum the asylum over to the Inmates? are the ones who create value. "People will do things because they of business: prbvldlni value In the mar-Not exactly. But management as It It ls already happening. Just look at believe In what the corporation Is doing, ketplace. · . 1 exists today should not and cannot be software giant Microsoft Corp., already and because there are no other! roles The major objective or any business salvaged by any Ravor-of-the-month a broadly entrepreneurial company. avalJ.able. People will not be super- say the authors, Is detecting or ereatlng managerqent fad. In fact, management There Is an acid test In determining vlsea, though the results or their actions customer demands and then wor•ln1 to as we know It today ls doomed as we Just how entrepreneurial your company will be transparent to all colleagues." : rpeet them. . head Into the next century, argue the and Its employees are: Do managers at Six major forces are driving the death· Unfortunatel1, the dominant manage-· · authors, both or whom are management your company spend more time con-of management and shaping thtt new , ment fads ortbe 19901-re-en1lneerln1 consultants -Godden for Booz Allen le tributing to the Internal processes or post-management corporation, the . ·: and empowerment -have not helr.ed Hamilton and Koch for bis own British managing and administering, or do they authors say. i . . . ~ much especially In bl1 ors"nlzat ons. . Orm, Odyssey. . spend more time adding, In some clear They are cu~tomer power; the spread: Whhe re-engineering has helped dl1-Koch and Godden are quick to . and direct way, to the welfare or cus-of Information tech~ology; sharphold-'. mantle aome of the "l\metlonal ner-acknowledge the paradox here: . · t~mers, Investors and society? . ·. ers' assertion of their legltlmac~ and , doms" that permeate so many arge · . Management consultants who ate saying · In 98 percent of today's companies, . rights; the emclenclee forced by lnter- companlea, It .. 88 railed to fundamental-· th~t management Is no longer necessal')'. " managers do too much of the former and national competition; the drive for cbr- ly change moat corporations. We may be perceived as biting the not enough of the latter. Ultimately, porate slmpllclty -reversing the trend · And empowerment, which 11 a kind of band that feeds ua by questioning the mapagers and employees must add of the last 50 years toward complex · throwbaclt to the reel-good, Dower-essence of management power and more to a company than ther subtracl lndustl'lal structures· and leader rower. power mentality or the 1960s, I• simply puthorlty,".they write ... Howeve~i we are No organization can sustain a manage-as a new breed orsu~cessful chle exec~ not workable In most large co111panle1, speaking out from a genuine des re to ment that Is preoccupied with organlz-utlves bury themselves In corporations. where success depends on leadenhlp, paint a picture or the next generation of Ing rather than doing. Instead or relying on a bureaucratic control and singular direction. successful large corporations." . Companies such as Microsoft are ush-hierarchy or middle managers so what's the answer? Leaner man-· Management within a large corpora-erlng In an era of 11super corporations'' It all sounds a bit Utopian. But In agement? Actually, say the authors, the lion actually subtracts far more value led by entrepreneurs, not managers. reality It Is far rrom It. solution ls more radical than that. than It adds, they say. Senior manage-These corporations will have standard-Makes you wonder If It's wGrih ft The answer Is no management at all. ment alone spends about '10 percent or lzed operations throughout the world spending all that time and money earn-but lack a central headquarters. They Ing an MBA. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Date Subject Newpo~+ ~°"'I IJattr"sk.et( S"~ L.A. limes 04 e. g / tct I '11 -. OK Likely for $500,000 Study of Newport Bay Watershed The county is poised to join the state Water Resources Board and the Coastal ·Commission for a two-year, $500,000 study of the Newport Bay watershed. County supervisors are ex- pected to approve the second of two grants today, with most of the money coming from the state water board. About a third.of the funds will come from the Orange County Transportation Corridor Agencies because the proposed Ea8tern tollway will be built near San Diego Creek in Tustin,· close to the El Toro Marine Cm:ps Air Station. The grants are provided through the federal Clean Water Act. Upper Newport Bay and its watershed are listed as impaired because of nutrients, sediment, toxins and bacteria, said Chris · Crompton, manager of environ- mental resources for the county. The state study will better map the 150-square-mile watershed and track the effects of develop- ment and runoff. "This is an attempt to find some solutions for the long-term· problems of the watershed," Crompton said. The first grant, approved .1 ' earlier this month, was for about $50,000, with most of the money coming from . the Coastal Com- mission. The grant expected to be approved today is for $137,000, which will be used for evaluating the impact of toxic materials on the watershed and for a series of public hearings.: A third grant for $319,000 will be used to buy one or two additional booms used to capture trash and debris along San Diego Creek before it feeds into Upper Newport Bay, Crompton said. A separate project to dredge built-up sediment and silt from the bay received partial funding earlier this month. The state . budget signed by Gov. Pete Wit- son includes $2 million for the $4.9-million dredgipg project. -JEAN 0. PASCO f + . ( ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Date Se.~'40-I Subject LA Ti·-~s o.c. ~4 B/t'll'n H o.t'tl Ssn\e.t\+ Tm·.'\·, "'I.+,,. rr\4~1~n: -.., ., .. \ · .. B4 R TUF3DAY,AUGUST 19, 1~ ORANGE COUNTY . ~Qrintf Platis trailliligill Har~mentissues : • Workplace: All 2,oOO bolster staff 4evelopment . pro-~ r.: The Lal>ucer we. ls the moSt A tOp. Soci8I . Services Agency . • grams that were cut in the wake of · prominent of four smrual harass-administrator was placed on ad-. managers will" be taught · · Orange County's 1994 bankruptcy. ·, ~· ment complaints either pending or ministrative leave $-lier this year how to address the matter •. ~.. "~e conthiued to proVide [such] -.'>.recently. lodged ,ag~inst county after being accused of sexual bar- . • · · ·· ·· : training. through the bankruptcy,-._ .. :.• managers. . . _ . . . . . . assmenl Move said not to be tn 1 :· but it Wa8 not as extensive as we : .' LaDucer stand& accused in a civil Despite the cases, county offi-. · · ·. response to currOOt caseS· :.:. '.; ._: wou1~ have _likett," .. satd Batt· Bart-\; . suit of. making inappropriate com-·· c1a1s 1ns1st. that sexual harassment . · · . . • . . · lett, manager of the ~ounty's Equal . .ments . to Lt. Wendy Costello as . and sex discrimination do not ap- -----------. ·.' .. Employment Opportunities Access·.,·., well as groping her and other .. pe~r. to be ·major problems lil ·. · By SHELBY GRAD ·. · . . · · . ·.office. "Now; we are able to beef up .: "~female Sheriffs Department .. em':' ' county government. "I feel one or · TIMES ~APP WRITBR ·1· • ·; • : :. • • 1 ! ,-; ·'. • ' · · the program· • · • . and mak~-sure :' ployees. After an internal investi;.: · . two· public cases can. 'distort. the . .SANTAANA~Overtheiiextslx .. people are aware of the law and its · gation into the allegations,_ Sherif' ~.picture," Bartlett said. "We run. a months, the ~~ty will provide~ provisions." . , . . . · .. : B~d Gates : last· wee~ ... fired his . · good shop.'~ . . . .. . . _:·: · .'. _ ·: · training to all 2,000 of its managers, The training ~ touch on ;what ~. longtime aide. LaDucer s attomey, : . . He said employees have submit-. supervisors and executives on how ··'·is,· censidered~ . appropriate. con-.!. however, denies that the" lawman_···~ ted only two sexual. harassment . to deal with seXtial harassment In .... ~=duct .• and 1 bow ... m~nagers .. should . ':· .-~d anything wrong. ,: . . · :. . -_ _. . . .' cases to his office over the lastfew · . the workplace. i . . :-... · . ' . ·deal with complaints of sexual:\ __ : . · Helllth .. Care .. Agency. Dtreetqr: years. . . . . . The training~ w~ch ~ ~ ~er!<:···,.1 ·==~~v!~~~~~d;~~~:i'::J .i:·· ~= :i~:::b; f=~ . .f" s!~°:n~..!~=: :=~=n~~f~' formed by a law fl~ that special".':'• ~' the training at one. time or another J ··county , Finance , Director Eileen. ' clals found some merit . to the ' izes in work~lace (ssues, comes ~~-'..·and that the new classes will be a J. Walsh,: 'who contencts Uram made ; · charBe and issued a· written warn-' the county grapples with four ·· '~refresher.'' . . · • .. ~ · .. : (.~off-color remarks ·about women !. · 1ng to the person accused 'high-profile.-s,e~al. haras~ment . . . In June,· tlie ~cowity .. iit&il~ cOp· i: I and treated female' employ~ Im-. ·' In the other pase, an employee . . . cases, Including.one· that~r~~~-· les:of its sexual harasSment gUlde-.·_; properly •.. Uram ~as .denied any ·claimed she was sexually harassed · ·in the .flrinl. last week of Asilistant: : lines to all 14:000 employees in. '.-. wrorigdoirig, and the case is set to and then given a poor perfonmµ1ce .. Sheriff Den~ LaDu~er. . : . . their pay envelopes. rrhe guidelines,:; . ~Bin later this year~ . : .. . . evaluation ~ter Cf?mplainlng. In- County officials sald the training . said employees should refrain from . • And three Health Care· Agency vestigators didn't find evidence of Is not being arrang~ in ~nse to "making-unwanted . sexuab ad-1;. ··workers filed suit ·last week,· · .harassment but did find inerit to the recent rash of sexual harass-.· vances".or creating an "intimldat-. · charging that.their managers de-'the retaliation· charge. So they ~ent and sex discrimination ~ases · Ing, hostile and. offenBlve'~ ... work. - 1 ;; ·· nied the~ promotions because of ··asked that the evaluation be re- : : but rather marks . an . effort , to · environmenl . · . . · .. ' . · : :;-1 " • . their gender. .. .· written. . c. · ·' . .';:". . • " . .. . I ; ;·,1. . ... ·--· :. __ ..:__· --------· -··· ... I\ -J /~J tl·\ 6-1)1&31\..L-- • •' •: : "' a LOS ANGELES TIMES County Gets Ul~tfuri-· J. to Pay 0µ.fMorieY from: ....... . Agreemetit With MeITm .:· . ·•. ..:~-. . ... :. ~--.... . ..... ~ . . . . : . t~-· : . . ;. ··,:· ... ~ .• :~:.·. ' ". • •.• : . ~. _ • Governmint: Agericies that lOst funds m inyesiinent ··:· :pool consider taking inatter top; S. Bankruptcy C9urt if . '.~- the $30 million ls not is.med by Ti;iursday. .: --~ .... ··. . : : .. ·' . . .. . By SHELBY GRAD · ·'· .: ,. 1. . • ~ ~oouri." -~._-::;~· .. :> :f:.-::-·:: · :, __ I TIMBS STAPP WJUTBR .-.\ • ""< ··' . :: · '.. · · . · More .. than 200 government.. . ~ ._ • , . • ·: .. ::.;• --•. L ... ·; · .. : • -.,. • ;··agencies bad deposited money in. . . ' SANTA ANA:~;L«al _clti~ and ,·the . county-run investment pc)of ,·::-. .. . ._ school districts ~d they will ~n-· .. that lOst $1.64 billion of Its value in ;. :._ _. · · ~der ~legal a~tiQn.uilJ.es8 the 1994, prompting county officials to ;~_ :· .. : ~ councy agrees by :Thursday _that · . declare bankruptcy. While most of · ... · · · they should be given the $30 mil-:_.:_.those agencies have received 80% :,· ·:. :· lion that Merrill Lyn~ &: .Co. paid : · .w 90% of their investment back, ·. ,. . · · · to avoid prosecutio~ . ~n J>ank-'. .. · . . . . · . · . ruptcy-rela~~es:.·~~·~::r;:·: .. < .. · · ~--.. , , .. · .. ... ~ . . . . ... · The cities ~~. ~ool'.dist.ricts . _: · · . ~ ?: 'We wouid llke a · that lost money.ui the_ bankruptcy. · .. ·• ·~ · . . ·.: contend that the binkniptcy re-·· · ~-· ·resolutl0'9 by Thursday. · t . ; · . · ·covery . plan reci~es:. that _the , · ; Thi balfls In thecolinty!s :. -.:._ · $30 ~nbepaidouttothem.. --.·. :: .~. , , ~" . . , · .. But some county officials said · :·~ : · · .. : . ·'· COUf'.t... . . ~ . · the government agencies are not .:· ·, ·' <:-: ·J· . . -· · t :'.'~ · .... .. · • entitled to 'ihe money, ·and they . · ~· : :,:;~--.: ~AULBIW>Y -.~ · have suggested usirig· it for a ". : ·. · ·~. ~-· ~ne .. clty manager variety of p~ county projects. · ·. · ·. .. · · ~. . · .... ~-: .· · Attorney& for the various parties · · ·· · ... :' •:~ ;_.-,.~ ~::: ::.-.~:;·£X-.t .. ~fl.. · .. have been meeting in ari attempt to . they wm see 'the ~der only if = S()rt out the· legal issues since , . the coun(y Is eucees&fuUn its civil .: . lh~rtly after Merrill Lynch agreed -_ .r ·uttgation · againSt. · :yernn· Lynch . : .... 1 , ·to· the settlement · t.i ·June.· But . ~d otheridt. holds iesP01'81ble for .· · patience appears ~ be'.·:.w~ ··· : oauslng thefinanchil collapse. · ·. · . : "thin. . .. .. =/.~~~ ·:.::'t·:~~:._i;~:?~~"; --~~.;.:::~:~·under. the recovery J-P.lan, the Irvine City Manlier Paul' Brady· · .. first~ from th~ civillitiga- said a commit~ .of cl~; 'speclal. ·i tion· woUld gO tc>' sChoOl. districts,. · districts and sc'h~ plan to meet· · :. ~hlch are still due ~ut $110 mil- Thursday to discuss the matter:-~· •J :·.-lion they invested in th~· pool But , If the county-~·~ agreed by ... · the ~very plan does not mention . then to turn overjhe $30 uiillion, ·:~how settlements of~ cases Brady said. the _comiDlttee··~uld .. ·· . .-shouldbehanc11~ ~;9~·t,t:, :: . decide to briilg the dispute to the · -:-.:;· Some county supervisors .. favor lJ. S. Bankruptcy Courtj\ldge who·_.::,.livinl most of:the $30 .~on to approved the rec6very plan..,,·:.:.."".'·.::::: .. : ·.schools as·agestute of good faith. •.•we have suggested' :_very···:.:;_ ·But' other ~Iii have ex- . strongly that this money belongs to ~ pressed interest · 1n · using the the [outside] investors (Iii the · $30 million for a 'variety· of press- county's investment pool] and not ing"county projects, sucll ·as ex- the county," Brady .. said._ ~~W'e ••. ,,. ~ding ~ spa~; __ constructing a would like a resolution by: Thurs-·~.. new South Countj Courthouse and day. The ~ Is in the comity's · . .;retiring bankruPiCr debts early. . . ' .. : '• -~ L . . I I vt,U_-f1-tqutd Assets "w&J". A Bass Play in Water May Presage Big Shift In I ts Distribution Los Angeles Agency Sweats Over Supplies, Gouging, But Some See a Harvest Why MarketsSeemlnevitable By CHARLES McCOY And G. PASCAL ZACHARY Staff Reporters o/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL LOS ANGELES -If you think water is a bland subject, listen to what the billionaire Bass brothers, big time Texas investors, are saying these days about the Metropoli- tan Water District, one or the world's biggest utilities: "A monopolist. A water thief." Replies John R. Wodraska, general manager or the agency that serves 16 million urban- dwelling Southern Californians: The Basses are profi- teers trying to cre- ate a "water cartel" in hopes or making a huge fortune on a resource delivered to them essentially for free. Adds Mr. Wodraska: "This is going to get nasty." In fact, it al-Edward Bass ready has. A few years ago, the Basses, with a S7 billion empire in oil and real estate, raised a re.w eyebrows when they began quietly buymg up SBO million in irrigated [arm land in the sprawling Imperial Valley south and east of here. They were going to raise cattle. But it became clear, soon enough, that the Basses' real interest was in the perpetual federal water rights con- ferred with the 40,000 acres they acquired. Seen as a longterm arbitrage play, the strategy goes something like this: Eventu- ally, water supplies for this area of vast urban sprawl and water-hogging agricul- ture will grow tight; those with the water, and the right to sell any surplus, stand to make megabucks. Whether the Basses' gambit works ex- actly as planned, their timing coincides with an unprecedented effort by state and federal governments to deregulate utilities of all kinds. Many believe water, long subsidized by taxpayers and ladled out by public agencies under programs tilted to- ward agriculture and against conserva- tion, will be no exception. The Basses' significant presence sim- ply adds weight to what some think is the inevitable: that water must become a commodity, to be sold at whatever price the market will bear. "Without water markets, we can't solve the problem of meeting the future water needs or the West," Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt says. If the slugf est between the Basses and ~he. M~tropolitan Water District is any md1cauon. however. getting there may prove to be a rancorous struggle reminis- cent of an old-fashioned water war wherein powerful elites wrested water from others creating vast fortunes and plotlines for the 1974 film "Chinatown." The Basses last year fired an opening salvo at the district, known as the Met, wh.en ~hey h.elped convince the Imperial Imgat1on District. an agriculture-domi- nated water agency, to strike a deal that would pool IID surplus water from its farmer clients, including the Basses. and sell it to the city of San Diego for prices as much as 40% less than it currently pays the Met. Surpluses could be created by conser- vation, switching to more water-efficient c.rops or even ~eeping land out or produc- t1~n: nothmg m the act conferring the original water rights prohibits their sale. The _75-year contract would fetch prices starting at about 15 times as high as what valley landowners currently pay the dis· trict for the water, which it takes for free from the Colorado River. : San Diego. not coincidei:itally, happens tp be the Met's biggest, and unhappiest, customer. The Met quickly denounced the deal and, more forcefully, bran- dished a weapon that could stop it. Since the IID's wa- ter would have to move through the Met's aqueduct. the . Met has already proposed a trans-< port surcharge that would make the Lee Bass deal uneconomical. And it escalated its resistance just two weeks ago when it took the extraordinary steps of appealing to a federal agency that controls irrigation outflows from the Colorado River; what the Met ultimately is asking for is a share of the IlD's Colorado River allocation -a move that, if successful, would take water right out of the hide of IID farmers, including the Basses. The Met doesn't pussyfoot around what is at stake here. Losing San Diego, its biggest customer, would raise costs for its other customers and could eventually lead to the Met's disintegration. "It could be the end of the Met as we know it," says Tim Quinn. the Met's chief dealmaker. Matters have grown so testy that Mr. Wodraska says, 'Tm afraid I'm going to get my nose sliced off," referring to the Please Turn lo Page A6, Column I ,, 'fk (YA 17-l.CD Hi.0 ~I J)oµJ A voc:::-r J~n,JL) AZ.n~ ~A~J/t~~ H C-<t;_ /t-tf~tA-L-. vAL-L-~ ~ ~h~C.~ A6 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL FRIDAY • .nJLY 11, 1997 Bass Brothers Roil the Western Waters Continued From First Page rate or the hardboiled hero in "Chinatown" who takes on wealthy water grabbers. Counters Ardon Moore. the Basses' point man in the Imperial Valley: "If they think their normal routine or spreading misinrormalion and insults ... Is going to make us hide under our tractor, they have railed IO do their homework." Deep Issues The spat here has enormous policy implications for water use In the West which. like other regions or the country, is governed by a hodgepodge of federal and state regulations. Agriculture consumes about 91m or the region's water. even as its contribution to the urbanizing region's economy is diminishing. Ir water can be sold freely. the argument goes. farmers will have powerful Incentives to conserve and growing cities will have a mechanism for obtaining water. The great practical question. backers acknowledge. Is to what degree the public will tolerate the poten· tially huge profits that markets could mean for some landowners. even when they have their water because of taxpayer·funded dams or other public investments. Some suggest that several of the Imperial Val· ley's biggest landowners could reap much of the profits Crom an estimated S2 billion to SJ billion in revenues over 50 years. "My feeling is that ultimately if you're perceived as profiteering in the sale or water. you're going to unleash a lot or ugly forces," says Don Cox. an Imperial Valley grower and a director or its irrigation agency. Mr. Cox's view. in fact. highlights a fissure among Imperial Valley landowners themselves. som11 or whom are leery or the Basses and their plans even though many rarmers there stand to make money should the contract with San Diego, or other entities. eventually go forward. ·. It probably hasn't helped that the Basses. though they initially eased into this desert valley, wasted no time In rtexing their muscle. Consider that a 1996 Imperial County review board, a county· appointed investigative citizens panel. found that the Basses appeared to have had "undue innuence" on irrigation dis· trict decisions; among other things, Mike Clinton. a Conner consultant whose Cinn · once worked for the Basses, was hired as manager of the IID not long after the Basses arrived on the scene. The Bass brothers are Sid. Robert, Edward and Lee. Edward and Lee are said lo be the main drivers behind the Imperial Valley waler play. The investments. how·. ever, may be divisive within the Bass camp Itself. A lobbyist for Robert Bass recently conracted an opponent of the Bass plan to assure him that Robert wasn't involved. (A spokesman Cor Robert Bass declined to comment.) Nonetheless, Bass officials are galled by the criticism otrheir strategy. A spokes· man notes that selling water is a concept that had been kicked around in the valley long before the Basses arrived. "This Is a real opportunity for the Imperial Valley to do something that is good for the state, Jrood for the economy. ~ tor the environ· ment and will help move airrlcullure into lhl' 21st century," says Mr. Moore, presi· · dent or Western Farms & Cattle Co.. a Uass·owned California farming enterprise lhmui:h which the Basses have made their Imperial Valley purchases. As ror the Imperial County review panel's report, the Basses say they did nothing Improper. Whatever the case, the Basses have certainly waded into the middle or one or California's longest-running feuds. The Met and Imperial Valley growers are his· toric enemies. Since its creation in 1928, the Met has eyed with envy the vast water resources of the Imperial Valley, a desert that gets only two-inches or rain annually. Though it has a population or only 160,000. the valley, through the IJD, has old water rights allowing it to draw about three million acre feet or water annually from the Colorado River. (An acre Coot ls 326,000 gallons. or a two-year supply for a family or four.) Landowners' water rights are held in trust by the llD. governed by a Cive-mem· ber elected board and based In.the valley. As a result or agricutture·f rlendly policies dating back decades, the district gets the waler tor Cree (though It pays Cor dlstrlbu· lion costs> and sells it for 512.50 an acre fool lo desert Canners who grow alfalfa, melons. lettuce and other crops. Under the district's plan. tanners would generate water savings by switching to less water· intensive crops or conserve water through new techniques. thus saving water that can be shifted 10 cities. The Met. by contrast, buys water Crom a variety or sources for prices ranging up to S200 an acre Coot: it sells water for about SJ50 an acre Coot to its mostly urban users. represented by 27 water agencies spread over six counties. It is allowed to draw only about 550,000 acre feet or water annually from the Colorado River. and gets another 1.5 million acre feet or so Crom other sources. But the Met is widely res~nled In Western water circles. For one thing, it has typically exceeded its Colorado River enti· llement by sopping up water not used by neighboring states. a practice resented by the states and one which the federal gov· emment is ordering it to stop. · Moreover. for decades the Met has wielded political muscle in heavy-handed ways. One of its members, Los Angeles, engineered the most notorious water power play ever. practically draining the Owens River valley In the 1920s and leav· Ing farmers there high and dry. This isn't lost on Canners in the lmpe· rial Valley. "The Met is an 800-pound gorilla,'.' says John Pierre Menvielle, an Imperial Valley grower. "Well, the Basses arc our 800-pound gorilla." Starting the Play Which is what scares others. Louise Willey, a 77·year-old rancher, met with two Bass officials. including Mr. Moore, in the spring or 1995. "They assured me they were just a couple or good ol' boys" who wanted to graze cattle. she says. "I said. 'Whatever you do. don't mess around wilh our water. They said. 'Oh no ma'am, we wouldn't do anything like that.· " Mr. Moore says the Basses never mis· led anyone •. but In any case, they had made their plan plain to others. Mr. Wodraska or the Met, for instance, met with Mr. Moore for· dinner at the Los Angeles Century Pla1.a hotel in September 1994. Mr. Moore eventually talked about the .JID selling water to the Met.. He didn't lulk price, but two weeks later, he met with Mr. Quinn, the Mel's chief dealmaker. Whal happened al lhat meetin~ is a maller or boiling dispute. Mr. Quinn says Mr. Moore proposed selling water at S600 an acre root -more than three times what the Met has ever paid, even in a drought. Mr. Quinn says he bluntly told Mr. Moore: "I don't see a market where you do.·· Mr. Moore heat· edly denies proposing any prices. In any case, both sides agree that the meeting left hard re~llngs; a Bass lobbyist even called Mr. Wodraska the next day 10 complain that Mr. Quinn had treated Mr. Moore brusquely. When Mr. Wodraska called Mr. Moore to talk things over, their conversation turned testy, too. both say.· Meanwhile, in the valley, the Basses' trademark low·prome was giving rise to some strange rumors. At one point, the Basses were said to be growing crops Cor Russians. In fact. they were running cattle and leasing land to other rarmers. But in June 1995, at a public meeting before an overflow crowd in the IID auditorium, Mr. Moore urged growers to take advantage or a historic "window of opportunity." "We are firmly convinced that water Is going to move In the·Western U.S." he said. "The real Issue we are .trying to figure Is how do all or us-and we are going to be involved in this-do It wisely." l\llxed Opinions. Some people enthusiastically backed the plan Crom the start, but It scared others. "The great paranoia that hit this valley was that the Basses would idle their land and take their water sale money to Fort Worth," recalls Mr. Clinton. general manager of the IID. Indeed, the prospect of rallowlng, the "F·word," as It is known here. still rattles some. They rear th~t as water is drawn off for sales. there will be less for Canning. land will lie fallow and the local economy will crater. "Only a few people will make money. and the rest or us will have to go some· where else." says Ed Brown, a farm·equip· ment salesman in the valley. The Imperial County review panel re· port. released in 1996 and noting Mr. Clinton's past ties to the Basses. didn't help matters. Mr. Clinton says he told the IID of his past work for the Basses before they hired him: ·the agency says it did nothing wrong: and a Bass spokesman says the review panel itself was stacked with antl·Bass members. Whatever its merit, the report fanned anti·Bass sentiment among some In the valley. Bill Condit, a 20·year veteran or the 110 board and a supporter of water sales. declined an orrer to meet the Bass brothers in Fort Worth. "They wanted to prove to me that they weren't some kind or mon· sters," he says. But he declined for fear or alienating his constituents. The Basses are wounded by that kind of commentary, and note that they have plenty or supporters In the valley. "Some people think we have horns. and some don·t," Mr. Moore says. He points out that the Basses have significant interests in California real estate, a major stake in Wall Disney Co. and many other invest· ments -and argues that without water transfers, the entire state economy could be jeopardized as urban areas Inevitably . nm short or water. · I '-. l1Cis 3damaili.liial !ti~ 8~5;;;;-;;;~~- . the long· haul in Imperial Valley. won't ranow land· and want the whole community 10 beneCit. Bass supporters also note the Basses have given heavily lo the United Way and other local charities. and have proposed earmarking a percentage of any water·sale profits for county services. The Bass interests· say the llD's pro· posed deal with San Diego, which they helped broker and strongly back, is further proof or their good faith. The original San Diego proposal. announced last fall. calls ror the sale or as much as soo.ooo acre feet or water a year annually for up 10 75 years for prices that start at 5200 an acre Coot and climb over time. The proposal has other innuential backers. in part because it is a shot at the Mel's long dominance of urban water. Tom Grarr, an Environmental Defense Fund attorney and a frequent critic or agricul· lure's water practices. nonetheless wel· comes the Basses' role. "They've got the toughness and · ag-gressiveness" to over· come the Met. "which is not a trivial opponent," he says. Still, the Basses· promise to hang In Cor the duration Is likely to be put to the test. San Diego and llD have reopened negotia· lions on the teff11s or their proposed deal because or concerns by some valley Cann· ers: the talks are so tough that Abraham Sofaer, a former Mideast envoy, has been called In to mediate. Any deal Is almost certain to produce lawsuits. Some experts doubt the matter will be resolved Cor years. And the talk only gets tougher. Mr. Quinn, the Met's dealmaker, goes over the math that he says sht>WS that the Basses. and other valley landowners. would reap enormous profits. even IC they plowed back huge amounts of their water sales into Improvements and conserva· lions measures. "The math is staggering." he says. "The rich get richer." The Basses insist profits wouldn't be anywhere near windfall levels and"say that markets themselves will create competi- tion and equitable pricing. or the Met. Mr. Moore observes: "Communism has been tried and it failed." Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority August 19, 1997 ' Donald F. Mcintyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Don, COMMISSION FOR THE PROJECT AUTHORITY CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ORANGE COUNlY WATER DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO VALJE( MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER NEILM.CUNE Enclosed is SAWPA's Check No. 1067 in the amount of $4,052,476.53. Subject to the CSDOC/SAWPAAgreement, SAWPAis required to purchase additional treatment capacity from tl)e County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. In April 1997, SAWPA submitted $1,039,969.00 to acquire 2 additional MGD increments over a 10-year period based upon SA WP A's understanding of the contract. CSDOC has not agreed with SAWP A's method of computing interest for the time purchase acquisition and has requested that full payment be made for the 9th MGD unit and additional funds be submitted to cover the initial charge for the acquisition of the lO'h MGD. The SAWPA Commission has reviewed this matter, as noted in our July 16, 1997 correspondence, and has agreed to purchase the 9th MGD capacity unit outright and seeks . to resolve the method of payment for the lO'h MGD in accordance with the "Meet and Confer" requirements of the Agreement. Therefore, the purchase price for the gth MGD is $4,543, 176.53. 9'hMGD lOthMGD AmountDue ·· · Less Payment on 4/18/97 Balance Due Very truly yours, . N liJ. . Ut,;,i Neil M. Cline Genera1: Manager $4,543, 176.53 549.269.00 $5,092,445.53 $1.039.969.00 $4,052,476.53 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503 • (909) 785-5411 Administration FAX (909) 785-7076 •Planning FAX (909) 352-3422 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING JULY 30, 1997 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 07/30/97 Page 2of10 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on July 30, 1997, at 7:30 p.m.1 in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 51 61 71 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT x Pat McGuigan, Chair Thomas E. Lutz N0.1 x James M. Ferryman, Chair pro tern Arthur Perry x Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz x Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts x Todd Spitzer William G. Steiner DISTRICT x Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Michael L. Maertzweiler NO. 2 x Mark A. Murphy, Chair pro tern Joanne Coontz x Steve Anderson John Holmberg x John Collins James Petrikin x Barry Denes Bob Bell x Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff x Mark Leyes Bruce A. Broadwater x Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz x Chris Norby Don Bankhead x Todd Spitzer William G. Steiner x HankWedaa Mark Schwing x Bob Zemel Tom Dalv DISTRICT x Mamie L. Rice, Chair James V. Evans N0.3 x Eva Miner-Bradford, Chair pro tern Paul F. Walker x Steve Anderson John Holmbera x Geome Brown Gwen Forsythe x Tom Carroll Mary Ann Jones Brian Donahue x Harrv M. Dotson x Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff x Mark Leyes Bruce A. Broadwater A Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller x Pat McGuiaan Thomas E. Lutz x Chris Norby Don Bankhead x Todd Spitzer William G. Steiner x Dave Sullivan Tom Harman x Charles E. Sylvia Alice B. Jempsa x Bob Zemel Tom Daly DISTRICT x Jan Debav, Chair John E. Neves N0.5 x John E. Noyes, Chair pro tern Jan Debav William G. Steiner x Todd Spitzer DISTRICT x James M. Fenvman, Chair Arthur Perry NO. 6 William G. Steiner, Chair pro tern x Todd Spitzer x Jan Debav Tom W. Thomson Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 07/30/97 Page 3of10 ACTIVE DIRECTORS DISTRICT x Thomas R. Saltarelli. Chair NO. 7 Christina Shea. Chair pro tern x Jan Debay x James M. Ferryman x Pat McGuiaan x Mark A. Murphy William G. Steiner DISTRICT Shirley Dettloff, Chair N0.11 x Dave Sullivan, Chair pro tern x Todd Spitzer DISTRICT x Burnie Dunlao, Chair N0.13 x Mark Schwina, Chair pro tern x Mark A. Murphy William G. Steiner x Bob Zemel DISTRICT Christina Shea, Chair N0.14 x Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair pro tern x Mark A. Murohv William G. Steiner x Peer A. Swan STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: ALTERNATE DIRECTORS Jim Potts x Barrv Hammond Tom W. Thomson Arthur Perrv Thomas E. Lutz Joanne Coontz x Todd Soitzer x Tom Hannan Tom Hannan William G. Steiner Martv Simonoff HankWedaa Joanne Coontz x Todd Soitzer Tom Dalv x Banv Hammond Jim Potts Joanne Coontz x Todd Spitzer Danvl Miller Don F. Mcintyre, General Manager; Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager of Operations; Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager of Administration; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Nick Arhontes; Jeff Armstrong; Barbara Collins; Mark Esquer; Ingrid Hellebrand; Brian Keating; Steve Kozak; John Linder; David A. Ludwin; Mike Moore; Mike Peterman; Suzanne Smith; Gary Streed; Moira Sullivan; Mitch Trivanovich; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy Wheatley; Chuck Winsor; Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L Woodruff, General Counsel; Art Perry, Alternate Director; Denis Bilodeaux; Don Jamison REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair reported that Governor Wilson had signed the Districts' consolidation bill, AB769. Staff was preparing the application to LAFCO and the Executive Committee would be meeting on September 17th to discuss the filing and the next steps to be taken. • Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 07/30/97 Page 4of10 Chair Collins also referred to a fax sent to all Directors announcing that Judy Wilson has accepted a position with the Los Angeles Department of Public Works as Director of Sanitation, subject to confirmation by the city council. It was then announced that only the Planning, Design and Construction Committee would be meeting on August 7. All other committees would be dark. In addition there would be a Directors' workshop on Saturday, August 2, focusing on the Districts' ocean discharge permit. The Joint Chair directed attention to the booth set up in the back of the room, which was the set up for a 17-day run at the Orange County Fair. Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications, spoke briefly about the fair and introduced key staff that was in charge of the project. ADOPT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING EMPLOYEE CAii Districts): The Joint Chair requested that Resolution No. 97-30 be adopted expressing appreciation to Judith A. Wilson for her contribution and dedication to public service upon her retirement from the Distrids. The resolution was then presented to Ms. Wilson. APPROVAL OF MINUTES CAii Distrids) There being no corredions or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 25, 1997, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Todd Spitzer abstained. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS CAii Distridsl MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A", "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 07/30/97 Page 5of10 ALL DISTRICTS 5/14/97 05/28/97 MISC. Joint Operating Fund $ 394,580.99 $ 386,016.11 $50,669.43 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 3,286,351.21 355,312.70 58,364.94 Joint Working Capital Fund 138,089.17 580,675.28 17,688.37 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 93,582.37 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 1 225.00 10,076.48 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 2,772.50 35,027.51 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 11,137.42 547,342.87 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 27.15 13,382.87 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 6 0.00 3,455.71 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 800.95 10,531.54 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 5,219.62 6,477.24 1,670.20 DISTRICT NO. 13 0.00 421.94 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 0.00 438.43 0.00 DISTRICTS NO. 5 & 6 0.00 498.40 0.00 DISTRICTS NO. 6 & 7 0.00 216.49 0.00 DISTRICTS NO. 7 & 14 0.00 17.18 0.00 $3 839 204 01 $2,043 472.53 $128 392.94 Directors Mark Leyes and Todd Spitzer abstained. DISTRICT NO. 2 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE PETITION RECEIVED FROM PHILLIP AND BARBARA JOUJON-ROCHE TO ANNEX .608 ACRES OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICTS IN THE VICINITY OF SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD AND MOHLER DRIVE IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF ANNEXATION OF SAID TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT. <PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 78 JOUJON-ROCHE ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2). MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to adopt Resolution No. 97-29-2, initiating proceedings for Annexation No. 78 -Joujon-Roche Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES CAii Districts): Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of Steering Committee presented A verbal report, re the July 30, 1997 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 25, 1997 to be filed. ·j Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 07/30/97 Page 6of10 DRAFT OPERATIONS. MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES CAii Districts}: A verbal report was presented by Diredor Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes.for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed. · AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS. INC. FOR PRIVATE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DISTRICTS' OXYGEN GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2: The Operations-Maintenance Department requests consideration from the Board of Diredors to amend several terms and conditions of the original agreement for an estimated cost savings of $215,000 for each year of the remaining seven (7) years of the fifteen-year contract. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Authorize the General Manager to execute an amendment to the original agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the private operation and maintenance of the Districts' oxygen generation system at Plant No. 2, approved as to form by the Districts' Contracts/Purchasing Manager. DRAFT PLANNING. DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES CAii Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1 WITH COUCH BROS .. INC. OBA COUCH & SONS. FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS <Districts 3 and 11 >: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 6 providing thirteen items of additional work and granting a time extension of 101 calendar days for completion of the additional work. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Change Order No. 6 to Contract No. 11- 17-1 with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons for an addition of $92,305.00 and 101 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $6,005,724.03. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 07/30/97 Page 7of10 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO JOB NOS. P1-41. P1-43. P1-44. P2-48. P2-50. P2-53-2. SP19950021 AND SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3. 4. AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1: SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON- STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 1: SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 1: REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS D THROUGH Q AT PLANT NO. 2: SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON-STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2: SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 2: TUNNEL COVER REPLACEMENT AT BILLINGS TUNNEL AT PLANT NO. 2: AND SLUDGE PIPING MODIFICATION AT PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS 6-15: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 1 providing eleven items of added and deleted work and granting a time extension of 37 days for completion of the added work. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P1-41, et al. with Margate Construction, for a deduction of $85,680.00 decreasing the total contract amount to $8,375,458.00, and an addition of 37 calendar days time extension. ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE CCDMl FOR JOB NOS. J-40-1 AND J-40-2 RE PREPARATION OF PHASE 1 OF STRATEGIC PLANS CALL DISTRICTS>: The Director of Engineering requests approval of an Addendum to the PSA providing for additional work in three areas: (1) updating trunk sewer system information contained in the Districts' CASSWORKS data base, {2) development of pump station discharge curves, and (3) additional public, staff, and Board meeting support. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the PSA with COM in the amount of $199,489 for a total amount not to exceed $1,958,717. Director Mark Leyes abstained. DRAFT FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION. AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES CAii Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 30. 1997 CAii Districts) A motion was made, seconded and carried to receive and fife this information-only item. ' Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 07/30/97 Page 8of10 ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER CAii Districts): After discussion among the Directors, the motion was moved, seconded and carried to refer this item back to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee for further study and consideration, to be brought back before the Joint Boards in September; and to place a moratorium on investing in reverse repurchase agreements until the Joint Boards vote to approve the final policy on reverse repurchase agreements. DECLARATION OF DISTRICTS' OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICTS' EXISTING CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE OF. AND IN ANTICIPATION OF. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES. FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE INDEBTEDNESS ISSUE CAii Districts): MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Adopt Resolution No. 97-28, declaring Districts' official intent to reimburse the Districts' existing capital reserve funds for certain expenditures made in advance of, and in anticipation of, capital improvement expenditures from proceeds of a future indebtedness issue. 1997-98 FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE UPDATE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE DISTRICTS' FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE VENDOR. JD EDWARDS. IN THE AMOUNT OF $55.384.87 CAii Districts): MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Approve the 1997-98 financial information software update and software maintenance agreement with the Districts' financial information software vendor, JD Edwards, in the amount of $55,384.87. Director Mark A. Murphy abstained. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CAii Districts): GSA staff requests approval of offering a computer financial assistance program to employees. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Approve a computer financial assistance program to employees providing for a maximum loan of $3,000; 1 Oo/o down payment; 24 months repayment period; interest rate at 5%; and aggregate maximum loan fund of $150,000.00. Director Mark A. Murphy abstained. AUTHORIZE STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH R.W. BECK TO DEVELOP ASSUMPTIONS AND STRATEGIES TO IMPLEMENT A REPLACEMENT FUND FOR FIXED ASSETS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75.000 CAii Districts): MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: That the Directors authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with R.W. Beck to develop assumptions and strategies to implement a Replacement Fund for fixed assets for an amount not to exceed $75,000. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 07/30/97 Page 9of10 ANNUAL ELECTION OF JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair announced that this was the annual meeting at which election of the Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization is to be held. The Secretary stated that Diredor John Collins had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 25, 1997, in accordance with established procedures. There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled and the Secretary the unanimous ballot for Director John Collins as Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. ANNUAL ELECTION OF VICE JOINT CHAIR This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards of Directors for the election of the Vice Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Joint chair then called for nominations for the post, whereupon Director Peer A. Swan was nominated. There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Peer A. Swan as the Vice Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. DISTRICTS 7 & 14 ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1. AND ABANDONMENT OF NINE DISTRICT NO. 7 PUMP STATIONS. CONTRACT NO. 7-14 (Districts 7 & 14) : MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: The Director of Engineering requests approval of Addendum No. 4 to the PSA providing for additional work for construction contract support services during the construction of Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1. Director Todd Spitzer abstained. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 07/30/97 Page 10of10 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS. P1-41. P1-43. P1-44. P2-48. P2-50. P2-53-2. P19950021 and SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR PAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH FACILITIES TO PERMIT DISCHARGE OF EXCESS RECLAIMED WATER TO THE DISTRICTS' OCEAN OUTFALL SYSTEM TO BE FUNDED BY DISTRICT 5 CAii Districts): The Engineering Department requests approval of Change Order No. 2 for construction costs for an increased amount not to exceed $197,299. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to execute Change Order No. 2 for Job Nos. P1-41, P1-53, P1-44, P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021 and SP19950059 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the Green Acres Project distribution system and the Districts' ocean outfall system for an amount not to exceed $197,299, to be funded by District 5; and, DISTRICT 5: Moved, seconded and carried to approve District 5 funding of Change Order No. 2 for Job No. P2-48 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the Green Acres Project distribution system and the Sanitation Districts' ocean outfall system at a cost not to exceed $197,299. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE <District Nos. 5 and 6): Receive and file Summons and Complaint for negligence, David P. Gatliff v. Wal-Con Construction Company, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 779933, in connection with Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1) Find that the matter arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2{b){2); 2) Receive and file Summons and Complaint; and 3) Authorize Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 CAii Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at 9:12 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item No. 18{a){5). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION CAii Districts): At 9:31 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. ADJOURNMENTS CAii Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:32 p.m. r s of Directors of i ricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, \\lead\data2\wp.dta\admin\BS\MIN97\073097.doc .... _, FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158819 A & G INDUSTRIES $1,805.22 STRAINER PROBES 158820 AT & T -MEGACOM SERVICE $3,013.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158821 AT & T -CELLULAR CR & R $1.47 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158822 AWSI $30.00 D.O.T. TRAINING PROGRAM 158823 ABRASIVE ENG. TOOLING & EQUIP. $154.24 HARDWARE 158824 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES $420.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 158825 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. $417,891.60 CONSTRUCTION J-34-1, P2-35-5 158826 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $139.25 AIRFREIGHT 158827 ALADDIN HOUSE $604.56 WINDOW BLINDS 158828 ALCO PRODUCTS INC $267.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158829 ALLOSEP $431.81 FILTERS 158830 ALPHA RESEARCH GROUP $14,430.00 ON-SITE TRAINING DEVELOPMENT 158831 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158832 AMERICAN DIGITALTECHNOLOGIES $1,200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158833 AMERICAN INST OF GRAPHIC ARTS $245.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 158834 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $257.33 PUBLICATION 158835 APCO VALVE & PRIMER CORP. $346.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES ~ 158836 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4,841.70 NOTICES & ADS 158837 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 158838 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT I-'· 158839 AWARDS & TROPHIES $172.69 PLAQUES rt 158840 BAR TECH TELECOM, INC. $200.00 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION :r 158841 BARNEBY-SUTCLIFFE CORP. $136.96 FILTERS ~ 158842 BARNES & NOBEL BOOKS $23.27 PUBLICATION 158843 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $7,500.21 BATTERIES 158844 BLACK & VEATCH $3,221.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-46 158845 BLACK BOX CORP $4,557.87 FIBER OPTIC CONVERTER 158846 BOOT BARN $96.87 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 158847 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $11,770.12 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18 158848 ROBERT B. BRESKIN $2,232.50 PERMIT FEE REFUND 158849 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $61.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158850 CS COMPANY $712.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158851 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $1,164.49 LAB SUPPLIES 158852 CALIFORNIA AUTO REFRIGERATION $357.20 REPAIR KITS 158853 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION, INC. $1,469.01 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 158854 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $120.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158855 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $679.00 MOVING SERVICES 158856 CAMALI CORP. $1,200.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158857 CANUS CORPORATION $37,298.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 158858 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $49,486.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95 158859 SUSAN W. CASE $165.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158860 CATAPULT INC. $2,720.00 ON-SITE TRAINING 158861 MARK CASTILLO $3,038.97 EXPENSE REIMB. 158862 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $17,328.79 INSPECTION SERVICES 158863 CLEAN SOURCE $651.35 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158864 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $8,328.70 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158865 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2,007.38 PUMP PARTS 158866 COMPUTERS AMERICA $219.70 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 158867 COMPUSERVE $821.03 COMPUTER SERVICES 158868 CONDENSER & CHILLER SERVICE $1,275.00 SERVICE ANALYSIS 158869 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $116.31 TRUCK PARTS 158870 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL $8,309.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 158871 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,057.15 ENGINE PARTS 158872 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $74.60 TRUCK PARTS 158873 COUNTY CLERK $228.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 158874 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $3,065.67 ELECTRIC PARTS 158875 CHARLES P. CROWLEY, CO. $785.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 158876 DELL MARKETING L. P. $46,595.42 COMPUTERS 158877 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $380.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 158878 DIAMOND H RECOGNITION $270.15 SERVICE AWARDS 158879 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $3,596.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 158880 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $1,065.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 158881 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $105.16 PAINT SUPPLIES ~ 158882 EMA SERVICES INC $3,100.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158883 ESP INDUSTRIES, INC. $130.86 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 158884 EATON CORP/CUTLER HAMMER $3,942.71 EQUIPMENT REPAIR ...... 158885 ELECT AIR $360.11 PNEUMATIC CYLINDERS rt 158886 ENCHANTER, INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95 ~ 158887 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,181.55 LAB SERVICES N 158888 JIM EVANS $2,597.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158889 FAIRBANKS SCALES INC $3,885.83 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158890 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $380.36 FRAMES 158891 FIBERTRON $198.63 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 158892 BAILEY FISCHER & PORTER CO. $267.39 FILTERS 158893 FLICKINGER CO $239.66 VALVES 158894 FLORIDA CONVEYOR & EQUIP $11,714.71 POLY-ROLLER ASSY. 158895 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $256.02 PAINT SUPPLIES 158896 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $89.47 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES 158897 GCS SERVICE, INC. $137.13 TIMER 158898 GCOE $99.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 158899 GST, INC. $14,735.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158900 GTE COMMUNICATONS (FLOOR 3) $164,342.54 PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADES 158901 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,115.21 LUMBER/HARDWARE 158902 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $5,660.92 CHEMICALS 158903 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $952.50 REPAIR SCRUBBER TOWERS 158904 . GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,175.66 TELEPHONE SERVICES 158905 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $92.00 I PUBLICATION 158906 GRASSY S.T.I. $530.48 ENGINE PARTS 158907 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO., INC. $6,751.90 ELECTRICAL PARTS 158908 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $111.54 PRINTING 158909 DGA CONSULTANTS $950.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 158910 HACH COMPANY $3,319.04 LAB SUPPLIES ........ .~ FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158911 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $2,484.19 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158912 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $6,254.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 158913 PL HAWN CO, INC. $314.88 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158914 LINDA HOLMES $2,312.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158915 HOME DEPOT $63.46 SMALL HARDWARE 158916 HRDIRECT $123.34 LABOR LAW POSTERS 158917 RS HUGHES CO, INC. $87.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 158918 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,341.73 WATER USE 158919 IC ENGINE & EQUIP SERVICE $2,159.99 GENERATOR PARTS 158920 IPCOSAFETY $922.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 158921 ISCO,INC. $49.39 INSTRUMENT 158922 IMAGING PLUS $594.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158923 IMAGING AND RECORDS MGMNT $200.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158924 INORGANIC VENTURES $139.00 LAB SUPPLIES 158925 IAML $1,675.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158926 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $677.15 BATTERIES 158927 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $2.90 WATER USE g 158928 JAMISON ENGINEERING $22,642.65 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 158929 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $2,412.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES b= 158930 JAY'S CATERING $440.69 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE ~· 158931 JENSEN TOOLS, INC. $226.28 OFFICE EQUIPMENT rt 158932 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $100.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 1' 158933 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $301.46 ELECTRIC PARTS w 158934 TERRI JOSWAY $250.00 TRAINING EXPENSES 158935 KEENAN SUPPLY $590.21 WELDING SUPPLIES 158936 KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. $25,454.82 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 158937 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $441.21 MACHINE SUPPLIES 158938 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $897.75 TOOLS 158939 VLADIMIR KOGAN $342.58 EXPENSE REIMB. 158940 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,618.73 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 158941 LAOUG (LA ORACLE USER GROUP) $495.00 MEMBERSHIP 158942 MDT $936.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158943 MAC OM CO $455.55 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158944 MANDIC MOTORS $44.00 TOWING SERVICES 158945 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $1 ,406,500.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2 158946 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $490,980.23 CONSTRUCTION P1-41, P1-43 158947 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $68,018.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-40-2(REBID), P2-47-2(REBID) 158948 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $82.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158949 MATT -CHLOR, INC. $201.86 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES 158950 MC INFO $10,460.67 COMPUTER HARDWARE 158951 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $120.88 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 158952 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $173.08 HEATER 158953 MELLON TRUST $15,227.10 INVESTMENT CUSTODIAN BANK 158954 MESA MUFFLER $137.75 TRUCK PARTS 158955 MICRON SPEARATION INC $58.34 LAB SUPPLIES 158956 MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING $2,732.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05114/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158957 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,744.44 UNIFORM RENTALS 158958 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $3,020.06 CONST INSP TRAILER LEASE 158959 MORTON SALT AND/OR $1,405.47 SALT 158960 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. $442.15 PUMP PARTS 158961 NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S $69.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158962 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP $451.28 TRAINING VIDEO'S 158963 NElWORK CATALYST, INC $9,417.27 COMPUTER HARDWARE 158964 NICKEY PETROLEUM CO., INC. $3,637.64 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 158965 SY NIELSON SERVICE INC $50.00 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION 158966 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $103.00 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 158967 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,954.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158968 OMNI WESTERN INC $410.85 TOOLS 158969 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $185.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158970 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,063.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158971 ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. $1,007.56 FITTINGS 158972 OXYGEN SERVICE $3,980.20 SPECIAL TY GASES 158973 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,685.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ~ 158974 COUNTY OF ORANGE $280.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 158975 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $431.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158976 PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. $2,554.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS ..... 158977 PACIFIC BELL $18.05 TELEPHONE SERVICES rt 158978 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $2,417.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES :r 158979 PASCAL & LUDWIG ENGINEERS $21,794.00 CONSTRUCTION J-33-2 ~ 158980 PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC. $63,617.20 CONSTRUCTION P1-38-2 158981 CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY $500.81 REIMB. PETTY CASH 158982 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC. $83,986.48 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 3-29-95 158983 US FILTER I POL YMETRICS INC $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 158984 POL YPURE, INC. $26,771.02 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 158985 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 158986 PRYOR RESOURCES, INC. $158.95 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158987 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $88.83 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 158988 HIPOTRONICS, INC. $59.59 FREIGHT CHARGE 158989 RJN GROUP, INC. $2,249.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158990 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $3,533.93 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 158991 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $329.34 TRASH REMOVAL 158992 RAND MATERIALS HANDLING $142.80 FREIGHT CHARGE 158993 RD SYSTEMS INC $222.03 CAMERA REPAIR 158994 REAL TIME $3,044.40 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES 158995 RED WING SHOES $151.71 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 158996 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $334.03 VALVE 158997 REMEDY TEMP $10,297.82 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 158998 REVCO I LINDBERG $233.67 DISPLAY PANEL 158999 GEORGE ROBERTSON $834.94 EXPENSE REIMB. 159000 MARCY ROTHENBERG $1,695.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159001 RUTAN & TUCKER $10,296.00 LEGAL SERVICES 159002 SCOTT SPECIAL TY GASES, INC. $1,449.03 SPECIAL TY GASES '-4' FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159003 SEWER EQUIP CO OF FLORIDA $7, 141.51 HOSE 159004 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,705.58 TOOLS 159005 SHURELUCK SALES $608.62 TOOLS/HARDWARE 159006 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,337.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94 159007 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $30.00 PERMIT FEES 159008 SO. CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $880.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 159009 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. $103.63 WATER USE 159010 SUCCESSORIES $520.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 159011 SUNSET FORD $189.11 TRUCK PARTS 159012 SUPELCO, INC. $1,032.89 LAB SUPPLIES 159013 SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $15,250.00 CONSTRUCTION 159014 SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $432,604.15 CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, P2-55 159015 SYMCAS, INC. $142.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 159016 TEKTRONIX, INC. $247.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159017 THERMO SEPERATION PRODUCTS $446.66 LAB SUPPLIES 159018 THERMO JARRELL ASH CORP $503.39 TRAINING PACKAGE 159019 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $10,986.32 MECHANICAL PARTS g 159020 TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE $330.59 LOCKS& KEYS 159021 EDWARD M. TORRES $300.55 EXPENSE REIMB. b= 159022 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $3,139.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS ...... 159023 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC . $722.90 TRUCK PARTS rt 159024 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $698.64 TRUCK PARTS :r 159025 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,811.00 LAB SERVICES Ul 159026 JG TUCKER & SON, INC. $1,503.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159027 MICHELLE TUCHMAN $110.52 EXPENSE REIMB. 159028 TULE RANCH/MAGAN FARMS $38,620.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL 159029 DANIEL TUNNICLIFF $250.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159030 TUSTIN DODGE $45.32 TRUCK PARTS 159031 UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $656.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159032 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $110.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 159033 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,208.50 LAB SUPPLIES 159034 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,873.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159035 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $79.48 VALVE 159036 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC. $1,993.37 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 159037 VERNE'S PLUMBING $632.30 PLUMBING SERVICES 159038 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $1,672.77 FIBER OPTICS 159039 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,138.56 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 159040 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $220.00 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 159041 WAXIE $136.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159042 WEF $500.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 159043 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $22,768.99 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 159044 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $57.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159045 WESTSIDE BLDG MATERIAL CORP $340.15 TOOLS 159046 XEROX CORP. $10,148.73 COPIER LEASES 159047 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $455.96 LAB SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 $3,839,204.01 FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 SUMMARY #1 OPERFUND #20PERFUND #2 CAP FAC FUND #30PERFUND #3 CAP FAC FUND #50PERFUND #70PERFUND #11 OPER FUND #11 CAP FAC FUND JTOPERFUND CORF JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT $225.00 $422.50 $2,350.00 $10,187.42 $950.00 $27.15 $800.95 $2,382.63 $2,836.99 $394,580.99 $3,286,351.21 $138,089.17 $3,839,204.01 PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ' .... .._ FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22/97 PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159070 AGX CORPORATION $424.06 GAUGE 159071 ABRASIVE ENG. TOOLING & EQUIP. $722.52 HARDWARE 159072 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $3,235.60 I LAB SUPPLIES 159073 AIR COLD SUPPLY, INC. $99.36 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS 159074 ALLIED PACKING & RUBBER INC $652.50 GASKETS 159075 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 159076 AMERICAN CRANE INSTITUTE $825.00 CRANE & MANLIFT TRAINING 159077 AMERICAN Dl~ITAL TECHNOLOGIES $6,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 159078 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $1,245.00 PUBLICATION 159079 AMER SOC FOR QUALITY CONTROL $351.50 PUBLICATIONS 159080 AMETEK $78.33 CIRCUIT BOARD REPAIR 159081 LLOYD ANDERSON $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159082 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES $1,233.39 MACHINE SUPPLIES 159083 ARMOR-VAC $1,146.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 159084 ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS $24,413.12 SOFTWARE UPGRADES ~ 159085 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH, INC. $260.78 FILTER 159086 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159087 CYMANTHA ATKINSON $18.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. ..... 159088 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO $214.42 AUTO SHOP SUPPLIES rt 159089 AVIS CONTRACTOR LICENSE SVC CE $2,085.00 EXAM PREPARATION tp 159090 BAYSHORE PSYCHOLOGY CENTER $125.00 SEMINAR FEE ~ 159091 BECWAR ENGINEERING $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159092 BELL PIPE & SUPPLY CO $502.22 VALVE PARTS 159093 BLACK BOX CORP $157.89 MODEM REPAIR 159094 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $5,259.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1 & P2-48 159095 BRENNER-FIEDLER & ASSOC., INC. 1330.32 GENERATORS 159096 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. 244.84 INSTRUMENT 159097 BUSH & ASSOCIATES, INC. $1,424.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 159098 CPI -THE ALTERNATIVE $755.32 LAB SUPPLIES 159099 CS COMPANY $1,516.35 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159100 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $203.65 LAB SUPPLIES 159101 CALTROL, INC. $3,109.62 HARDWARE 159102 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $435.54 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159103 CALOL YMPIC GLOVE & SAFETY $3, 119.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159104 CAMALI CORP. $1,300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159105 CAMP DRESSER & MC KEE INC $15,938.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 159106 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $4,403.12 OFFICE FURNITURE 159107 CENTURY PAINT $121.93 PAINT SUPPLIES 159108 CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY $50.00 I PUBLICATION 159109 CLEAN SOURCE $450.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159110 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159111 COLE SCIENTIFIC, INC. $20.10 LAB SERVICES 159112 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $293.84 LAB SUPPLIES 159113 COLOR ARTS INC $1,749.75 VEHICLE DECALS 159114 COMMUNITY ACTION\ EAP $950.00 DISTRICT EAP -MAY 97 159115 COMPUTERS AMERICA $1,741.94 COMPUTER SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122197 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05128/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159116 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $485.52 ELECTRIC PARTS 159117 CONSUMER PIPE $4,397.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159118 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $7,702.97 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93 159119 DOUG COOK $140.30 EXPENSE REIMB. 159120 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $307.24 ENGINE PARTS 159121 CORPORATE EXPRESS $175.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159122 CUMMINS-ALLISON CORP $981.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 159123 CA DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES $3,119.00 MEMBERSHIP 159124 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $20,126.00 1ST QUARTER UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 159125 DCC/CAL INC $137.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159126 CHRISTOPHER DAHL $817.37 EXPENSE REIMB. 159127 DATA CLEAN CORP $2,910.00 EARTHQUAKE PROOFING 159128 JIM DAVIDSON $392.34 EXPENSE REIMB. 159129 TOM DAWES $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159130 DAYS INN HOTEL $545.80 HOTEL RESERVATIONS ~ 159131 DELL MARKETING L. P. $13,210.15 COMPUTERS 159132 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $34,449.24 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94 ~ 159133 DELTA INTERNET SERVICES, INC. $100.00 DOMAIN SET-UP FEE ..... 159134 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,583.99 OFFICE EQUIPMENT rt 159135 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $515.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES tJj 159136 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $3,480.00 INSPECTION SERVICES ·Ii l\J 159137 ROBERT DUMITY $713.76 EXPENSE REIMB. 159138 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,001.25 PAINT SUPPLIES 159139 ESP INDUSTRIES, INC. $456.06 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159140 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $150.65 TRUCK PARTS 159141 J.D. EDWARDS $29,177.30 SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7-24-96 159142 EL-COM HARDWARE $81.62 FAN 159143 ELECTRA-BOND, INC. $1,621.64 REPAIR 159144 KENNETH J EMANUELS & ASSOC $16,500.00 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATE SERVICES 159145 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $900.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 159146 ENCHANTER, INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95 159147 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,030.35 LAB SERVICES 159148 JIM EVANS $4,519.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159149 EXCALIBUR ENTERPRISES $95.97 VIDEO CAMERA ADAPTER 159150 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $486.33 AIRFREIGHT 159151 FIBERTRON $2,754.23 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 159152 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $733.30 FILTERS 159153 FIRST CHOICE $1,236.56 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 159154 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $4,729.43 LAB SUPPLIES 159155 FLO-SYSTEMS $531.10 PUMP PARTS 159156 FORD TRUCK PARTS $431.00 TRUCK PARTS 159157 FORMA SCIENTIFIC, INC. $10,108.81 LAB EQUIPMENT 159158 FORKERT ENGINEERING & SURVEY $570.83 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 6-8-94 159159 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $146.91 PHOTO SUPPLIES 159160 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,806.83 PAINT SUPPLIES 159161 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $338.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES . t ... .,-. FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22/97 PAGE3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159162 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $144.28 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES 159163 GKK CORPORATION $498.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159164 GST, INC. $7,941.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159165 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE $110.00 PERMIT FEE 159166 GARTNER GROUP, INC. $1,185.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS 159167 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $166.34 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 159168 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,544.58 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159169 N. GLANTZ & SON INC. $207.72 TOOLS 159170 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $88.00 PUBLICATIONS 159171 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $930.70 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 159172 GRASBY S.T.I. $505.24 ENGINE PARTS 159173 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $2,680.65 PRINTING 159174 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,692.91 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 159175 HACH COMPANY $51.92 LAB SUPPLIES 159176 HAESTAD METHODS $295.00 SOFTWARE ~ 159177 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.868.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159178 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW $85.00 SUBSCRIPTION 159179 PL HAWN CO, INC. $16.97 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES I-'· 159180 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $4,151.50 CONSULTING SERVICES rt 159181 HIGHLANDER LAUNDROMAT $179.19 PERMIT FEE REFUND tJj 159182 HILTl, INC. $530.13 TOOLS I w 159183 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF., INC. $187.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS 159184 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $335.75 LAB SUPPLIES 159185 HUNSAKER & ASSOC IRVINE, INC. $600.59 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159186 JOHN HUNT $5,420.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-44-3 159187 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $780.00 WATER USE 159188 IPCOSAFETY $27,159.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159189 IMAGING PLUS $227.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159190 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFGS $2,462.82 FILTERS 159191 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $207.05 CONNECTORS 159192 INORGANIC VENTURES $244.81 LAB SUPPLIES 159193 INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED MGMT $1,575.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 159194 INTERSTATE BATIERY SYSTEMS $926.05 BATTERIES 159195 INTERSTATE ENGINEERING $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159196 ISCO, INC. $792.61 INSTRUMENT 159197 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $310.32 PRINTING 159198 JAMISON ENGINEERING $5,910.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 159199 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,286.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159200 JAY'S CATERING $735.22 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 159201 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $172.64 GAUGE 159202 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,732.05 ELECTRIC PARTS 159203 KAISER PERMANENTE $43,223.37 INSURANCE PREMIUM 159204 DIONNE KARDOS $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159205 KELAR CORPORATION $2,880.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 159206 KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. $86,174.01 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 159207 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4,285.33 TOOLS FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159208 DUSTIN LE $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159209 DAVID A LUDWIN $153.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159210 MPS $686.11 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 159211 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159212 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOC $70.00 MEMBERSHIP 159213 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,507.69 WELDING SUPPLIES 159214 MANTEK $321.99 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 159215 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $662.83 VALVE PARTS 159216 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $22.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159217 MIKE MCCARTHY $399.52 EXPENSE REIMB. 159218 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $69.32 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 159219 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $1,794.21 TOOLS 159220 CHARLES MCRANEY $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159221 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $2,940.94 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159222 METRA HEAL TH $114,457.98 INSURANCE PREMIUMS ~ 159223 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $5,668.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159224 MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING $11,431.51 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 159225 PORTIA MINA $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. ~· 159226 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $344.80 OFFICE TRAILER LEASE rt 159227 MONTGOMERY WATSON $6,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 2-26-97 tp 159228 MICHAEL D. MOORE $1,181.50 EXPENSE REIMB. ~ 159229 MOTEL SIX #34 $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159230 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC $1,137.68 ELECTRICAL PARTS 159231 MOTOROLA, INC. $893.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159232 SAM MOWBRAY $188.47 EXPENSE REIMB. 159233 NADINE'S LAUNDRY $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159234 NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHOPS $139.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 159235 NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS $5,233.10 ELECTRICAL PARTS 159236 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $758.14 EXTERIOR METAL LEITERS 159237 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $9,217.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159238 NElWORK CATALYST, INC $62,916.30 COMPUTER HARDWARE 159239 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 159240 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE $26,658.68 SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 159241 NWLAND/OR $12,986.21 LIFE INSURANCE 159242 01 CORPORATION $181.02 LAB SUPPLIES 159243 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $386.93 SAFETY GLASSES 159244 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $3,047.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159245 OMEGA CORPORATION $153, 145.35 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 159246 OMNI WESTERN INC $235.62 TOOLS 159247 ORACLE CORPORATION $1,600.00 SOFTWARE 159248 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $187.68 PUMP PARTS 159249 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $4,074.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159250 COUNTY OF ORANGE $23,473.58 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 159251 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $41,942.97 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 159252 COUNTY OF ORANGE $66.00 PERMIT FEE 159253 PSI $646.50 HARDWARE .. -.. ~ ., FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122197 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05128/97 POSTING DA TE 05/28/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159254 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $122,470.00 INVESTMENT MGMT. SERVICE RES 95-75 159255 PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. $602.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159256 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. $1,379.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159257 PACIFIC BELL $1,275.50 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159258 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $1,611.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159259 PAGENET $589.43 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 159260 PAINE WEBBER $60,848.44 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 159261 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $447.31 AIR REGULATOR 159262 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159263 PARTS UNLIMITED $831.15 TRUCK PARTS 159264 PERMASEAL $5,087.94 LUBE OIL 159265 CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY $2,099.66 REIMB. PETTY CASH 159266 JERRI Pl $46.65 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159267 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,025.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 159268 MIKE PRLICH & SONS $518,068.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-35R-1 ~ 159269 RM CONTROLS $50.72 PLOTIERPENS 159270 R & R INSTRUMENTS $549.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 159271 REAL TIME $255.00 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES ..... 159272 THE REGISTER $200.00 NOTICES & ADS rt 159273 LAWRENCE ROOD $79.26 DEDUCTION REIMB. tp 159274 SAVANT $2,017.60 LAB SUPPLIES U1 159275 R. CRAIG seen & ASSOC. $22,164.30 LEGAL SERVICES -PERSONNEL ISSUES 159276 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,215.42 LAB SUPPLIES 159277 SEARS $486.79 TOOLS 159278 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO $1,016.69 REFRIGERATOR 159279 SECOND-SUN $281.39 OFFICE FURNITURE 159280 SERPENTIX CORPORATION $6,558.58 NYLON ROLLER ASSEMBLY 159281 STUART SEVERN $893.66 EXPENSE REIMB. 159282 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,603.56 TOOLS 159283 SHURELUCK SALES $2,267.81 TOOLS/HARDWARE 159284 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $130.00 PROBE 159285 SMITH-EMERY CO. $5,402.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94 159286 SNAP ON I SUN CORP $608.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159287 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1,315.84 TOOLS 159288 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO $46,030.36 POWER 159289 SO CALIF EDISON CO $30,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15-95 159290 SO. CAL. GAS. CO. $20,328.71 NATURAL GAS 159291 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,084.94 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 159292 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO., INC. $250.00 METER 159293 SPRINT $32.70 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159294 SRECO FLEXIBLE $175.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159295 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $539.67 LAB SUPPLIES 159296 STRATEGIC FRAMEWORKS, INC. $12,180.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159297 SUNSET FORD $771.18 TRUCK PARTS 159298 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $143.55 HOSE 159299 SUPERB QNE-HOUR PHOTO $24.43 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122197 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28197 POSTING DA TE 05128/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159300 SYMCAS1 INC. $878.75 CONSUL TING SERVICES 159301 T J SAUSAGE KITCHEN INC $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159302 TEL-A-TRAIN INC. $6,529.50 TRAINING VIDEO TAPES 159303 TELEDYNE $1,248.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159304 TEST EQUITY. INC. $1,947.72 POWER SUPPLY 159305 THOMAS BROS MAPS $210.00 PRINTING 159306 TERRY THROOP $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159307 TORNELL & COTTEN $2,219.00 LEGAL FEES 159308 TOXGAURD SYSTEMS, INC. $1,995.00 REPAIR STORAGE TANK MONITORS 159309 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $173.41 TRUCK PARTS 159310 TRUESDAIL LABS $992.00 LAB SERVICES 159311 JG TUCKER & SON, INC. $2,679.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159312 UNIRULE INDUSTRIES $28.94 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159313 UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $93.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159314 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $331.07 PARCEL SERVICES ~ 159315 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 159316 UNOCAL CORPORATION $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159317 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $213.00 LAB SUPPLIES I-'· 159318 U S POSTAL SERVICE $5,000.00 POSTAGE rt 159319 VWR SCIENTIFIC $865.68 LAB SUPPLIES tp 159320 TONY VALENZUELA $150.00 EXPENSE REIMB. °' 159321 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $667.45 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159322 VERNE'S PLUMBING $880.22 PLUMBING SERVICES 159323 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $144.84 FIBER OPTICS 159324 VISION SERVICE PLAN -(CA) $7,644.00 VISION INSURANCE PREMIUM 159325 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $392.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 159326 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,130.56 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 159327 WATERS CORPORATION $5,415.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159328 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY $1,905.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159329 WEKA PUBLISHING, INC. $145.50 PUBLICATION 159330 WELLS SUPPLY CO. $1,171.02 VALVES 159331 WEMAC DIV OF PURITAN-BENNETT $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159332 WESTERN BUSINESS SYSTEMS $938.29 PAYROLL CHECK STOCK 159333 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1,312.90 FILTERS 159334 NANCY WHEATLEY $1,207.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159335 JUDITH A. WILSON $70.89 CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES REIMB. 159336 WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART $116,330.24 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95 159337 XEROX CORP. $9,527.70 COPIER LEASES 159338 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $567.88 LAB SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 $2,043,472.53 FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97 SUMMARY #1 OPERFUND #1 CONST FUND #20PERFUND #2 CAP FAC FUND #2 CONST FUND #30PERFUND #3 CAP FAC FUND #3 CONST FUND #50PERFUND #5 CAP FAC FUND #5 CONST FUND #60PERFUND #6 CONST FUND #70PERFUND #7 CAP FAC FUND #7 CONST FUND #11 OPER FUND #11 CAP FAC FUND #11 CONST FUND #13 OPER FUND #13 CAP FAC FUND #14 CONST FUND #5&6 CAP FAC FUND #6&7 OPER FUND #7&14 OPER FUND JTOPERFUND CORF SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT $2,057.52 $8,018.96 $13,957.76 $600.59 $20,469.16 $9,021.35 $519,689.47 $18,632.05 $1,379.31 $7,702.97 $4,300.00 $1,272.33 $2,183.38 $3,866.43 $2,639.18 $4,025.93 $2,613.21 $1,158.70 $2,705.33 $347.41 $74.53 $438.43 $498.40 $216.49 $17.18 $386,016.11 $355,312.70 $93,582.37 $580,675.28 $2,043,472.53 .. '· " PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. 06/12197 159659 06/19/97 159676 06/19/97 1596n 06/24/97 159945 06/25/97 159946 06/25/97 159947 ~ ..... rt () COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID -MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS VENDOR FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO BANK OF AMERICA BANK OF AMERICA NElWORKCATALYST, INC TOTAL CLAIMS PAID SUMMARY #11 OPER FUND JTOPERFUND CORF JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT $17,410.87 $5,318.89 $47,020.74 $138.75 $138.75 $58,364.94 $128,392.94 AMOUNT $1,670.20 $50,669.43 $58,364.94 $17,688.37 $128,392.94 PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE POWER POWER BANKING SERVICES BANKING SERVICES SOFlWARE ·• . ... ' --'~ ---- For Bd, ~ec. Us~ Onlk'. AGENDA ' 0 COMM. INFO. ITEM 0 COMM. ACTION ITEM ITEM 0 JT. BOS. CONSENT TRANSMITTAL 0 JT. BOS. DISCUSSION (NON-CONSENn 0 PUBLIC HEARING gfa11/aJT. BOS. MEETING DATE f_ : JT. BOS. AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE COMM. ID. NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Originator) PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR 2220 I Ross H. Tipps I 2558 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No., Name, and Extension JT.BDS: 08127197 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: RATIFYING PAYMENTOF CLAIMS OF THE JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS BY ROLL CALL VOTE (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Recommended Action(s): 1. Staff recommends approval of payment of claims/warrant listing. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES NO NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC Date Notice of Exemption Filed: ITEM: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on _ and Notice of Determination filed on_ CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR-YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Total Budget plus Transfers) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ NIA NIA NIA NIA SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION BUDGET TOTAL CHANGES THISAIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION PO, CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES NO NOT APPLICABLE If YES, state number: _ Permanent -Limited Term If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Revised 05114197 H:\WP.DTA\FIN\2220\TIPPS\AIT.WPD Page 1 of 2 Signature Date Assistant General Manager (Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Revised 05/14197 H:\WP.DTA\FIN\2220\TIPPS\AIT.WPD ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List) 1. Page 2 of2 FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159365 159366 159367 159368 159369 159370 159371 159372 159373 159374 159375 159376 159377 159378 159379 159380 159381 159382 159383 159384 159385 159386 159387 159388 159389 159390 159391 159392 159393 159394 159395 159396 159397 159398 159399 159400 159401 159402 159403 159404 159405 159406 159407 159408 159409 159410 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97 VENDOR A & D PARTY RENTAL ADS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AMA/KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER ROMA SALES COMPANY INC. ASTD (AM SOC FOR TRNG & DVLPT) ASTD PUBLISHING SERVICE AT & T -MEGACOM SERVICE AT & T -CELLULAR CR & R AT & T -PRO WATTS AT & T -MEGACOM SERVICE AT & T -CELLULAR CR & R AWSI ACOPIAN CORP ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS ALADDIN HOUSE ALLIED ELECTRONICS AMERICAN AIR FILTER, INC. AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AMERICAN SIGMA AMSA/KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER BLAKE P. ANDERSON ACS (APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. BANANA BLUEPRINT BAR TECH TELECOM, INC. BATTERY SPECIALTIES BELL PIPE & SUPPLY CO BERENDSEN FLUID POWER BIO-GRO DIVISION BLACK BOX CORP BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE BORLAND INTERNATIONAL BRENNER-FIEDLER & ASSOC., INC. BUDGET JANITORIAL BNIBOOKS CCI TECHNOLOGIES CS COMPANY CALIF WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOC. CALIF MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL CAL TROL, INC. CALOLYMPIC GLOVE & SAFETY CATAPULT CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. CHAPMAN COUNSELING AMOUNT $238.30 $13,000.00 $9,442.00 $35,600.00 $229.00 $150.00 $2,961.65 $1.64 $299.51 $843.30 $25.58 $1,839.41 $803.40 $411,843.60 $37,332.90 $3,500.00 $417.42 $6,190.75 $310.00 $10,736.95 $425.00 $307.40 $872.78 $628.00 $120.00 $3,239.65 $567.00 $811.13 $267.01 $30.74 $69,757.33 $2,162.40 $150.00 $1,095.76 $660.64 $3,085.00 $316.06 $1,638.63 $4,775.54 $93.88 $59.00 $958.04 $2,579.00 $2,720.00 $10,448.33 $7,285.00 PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION LEGISLATORS DAY RENTALS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAINING REGISTRATIONS FUEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MEMBERSHIP PUBLICATION LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES D.O.T. TRAINING PROGRAM POWER SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION J-34-1, P2-35-5 O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN. SYST. M.0.8-9-89 VERTICAL BLINDS FANS MECHANICAL PARTS VIEDO TAPE-CLEAN WATER ACT MECHANICAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCE REGISTRATION REIMBURSE EXPENSES COMPUTER SOFTWARE TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL WASTE OIL REMOVAL PRINTING M.0.11-07-94 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION BATTERIES COUPLER ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 FIBER OPTIC CONVERTER TRUCK REPAIRS COMPUTER PARTS GENERATORS JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 BOOKS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT PLUMBING SUPPLIES SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION HARDWARE SAFETY SUPPLIES ON-SITE TRAINING OFFICE FURNITURE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES < J ,.. FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159411 159412 159413 159414 159415 159416 159417 159418 159419 159420 159421 159422 159423 159424 159425 159426 159427 159428 159429 159430 159431 159432 159433 159434 159435 159436 159437 159438 159439 159440 159441 159442 159443 159444 159445 159446 159447 159448 159449 159450 159451 159452 159453 159454 159455 159456 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97 VENDOR CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT CLOSSON & CLOSSON COAST RUBBER STAMP COLE·PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. COMPPLUS COMPUCOM SYSTEMS COMPUSA, INC. COMPUSERVE CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO COOPER CAMERON CORP. COPELCO CAPITAL CORE LABORATORIES, INC. CORPORATE EXPRESS CORNELL MARITIME PRESS & COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY COASTAL CONSERVANCY COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS WILBUR C. CRIDLEBAUGH CSUS FOUNDATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA CA WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOC. DWG ASSOCIATES THE DARTNELL CORP DAVE'S BICYCLES, INC. DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. DELL MARKETING L. P. DENNY'S RESTAURANT #136 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOC MARC DUBOIS DUNN EDWARDS CORP. ENS RESOURCES INC EDISONITAC EDWARDS DIV. OF GS BLDG SYS. EMPLOYER ADVISORY COUNCIL ENCHANTER, INC. DARRELL ENNIS FAIRBANKS SCALES INC FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. FILTER SUPPLY CO. AMOUNT $11,271.29 $1,060.50 $92.92 $281.09 $2,730.00 $3,359.22 $651.72 $922.36 $17.81 $3,277.60 $1,010.13 $425.04 $7,998.88 $1,432.00 $800.00 $409.14 $24.95 $235.68 $18.00 $1,254.43 $738.49 $11,050.00 $10.05 $107.75 $848.00 $195.00 $1,980.00 $82.06 $143.89 $377.65 $9,004.67 $75.00 $3,248.00 $1,065.00 $21,104.00 $206.18 $663.50 $928.93 $1,280.00 $352.63 $80.00 $2,100.00 $250.00 $240.00 $82.12 $12,632.35 PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION INSPECTION SERVICES LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMPUTER PARTS COMPUTER SOFTWARE COMPUTER SERVICES TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC PARTS FREIGHT CRANE RENTAL ENGINE PARTS COLOR COPIER LEASE LAB SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PUBLICATION TRUCK PARTS SUBSCRIPTION ELECTRIC PARTS VIDEO CONSUL TING SERVICES OVERPAYMENT REFUND PUBLICATIONS VERIFICATION & MANIFEST FEES ADVERTISEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUBSCRIPTION BIKE REPAIRS TRUCK PARTS COMPUTERS PERMIT FEE REFUND INSPECTION SERVICES ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE EXCESS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE FIS TRAINING EXPENSE REIMB. PAINT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAINING REGISTRATION • SERVICE AGREEMENT SEMINAR REGISTRATION OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95 CASH ADVANCE SERVICE AGREEMENT AIRFREIGHT FILTERS .£_·' ~I FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159457 FIRST CHOICE $379.39 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 159458 BAILEY FISCHER & PORTER CO $897.13 CHLORINATION SUPP.LIES 159459 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $118.53 LAB SUPPLIES 159460 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $323.14 PHOTO SUPPLIES 159461 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,552.40 WATER USE 159462 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $800.00 PERMIT FEE 159463 THE FOXBORO CO. $2,982.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159464 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $7,422.80 OFFICE PRODUCTIVITY SUPPLIES 159465 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $140.02 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES 159466 CITY OF FULLERTON $138.01 WATER USE 159467 GST, INC. $11,785.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159468 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $86.06 LUMBER/HARDWARE 159469 GARTNER GROUP $95.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159470 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $620.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 159471 GENERAL PETROLEUM $8,563.10 UNLEADED GASOLINE 159472 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,210.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159473 GIGA INFORMATION GROUP $6,000.00 RESEARCH SERVICES 159474 GOLDENWEST WINDOWS $2,543.00 STEAM CLEANING OF BUILDINGS 159475 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $85.00 PUBLICATION 159476 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2,131.30 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 159477 GRASSY S.T.I. $1,583.11 ENGINE PARTS 159478 GRAYBAR $72.26 ELECTRICAL PARTS 159479 DGA CONSULTANTS $2,965.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 159480 HB TYPE & GRAPHICS $1, 131.37 PRINTING 159481 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $662.00 TRUCK PARTS 159482 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $594.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159483 HATCH & KIRK, INC. $2,093.93 TRUCK PARTS 159484 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,821.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 159485 Pl HAWN CO, INC. $233.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159486 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 159487 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $595.50 CONSUL TING SERVICES 159488 HILTl, INC. $127.19 TOOLS 159489 HOLMES & NARVER, INC. $3,575.06 ENGINEERING SERVICES 159490 HOME DEPOT $1,299.36 SMALL HARDWARE 159491 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,343.39 WATER USE 159492 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO $1,265.77 FINAL USER RECONCILIATION REFUND 159493 IBM $324.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159494 IPCOSAFETY $4,408.38 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159495 ISCO, INC. $5,392.03 INSTRUMENT 159496 ISi INFORTEXT $856.61 SUBSCRIPTION 159497 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $19.04 CONNECTORS 159498 INTELLIGENCE PRESS, INC. $687.00 SUBSCRIPTION 159499 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $13.43 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 159500 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $54.84 WATER USE 159501 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $495.65 PRINTING 159502 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $339.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159503 159504 159505 159506 159507 159508 159509 159510 159511 159512 159513 159514 159515 159516 159517 159518 159519 159520 159521 159522 159523 159524 159525 159526 159527 159528 159529 159530 159531 159532 159533 159534 159535 159536 159537 159538 159539 159540 159541 159542 159543 159544 159545 159546 159547 159548 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97 VENDOR JENDHAM INC JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. JENSEN TOOLS, INC. JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE JOHNSTONE SUPPLY TERRI JOSWAY KAHL SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. APPLtED INDUSTRIAL TECH KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS LAKEWOOD PUBLICATIONS LASERALL CORP. LAW/CRANDAL, INC. LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. LEWIS, D'AMATO, BRISBOIS K.P. LINDSTROM, INC. MPS MSTFASTPRO MACOMCO MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. MANHOLE ADJUSTING MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. MARVAC ELECTRONICS MASUNE COMPANY MCJUNKIN CORP MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING MILLIPORE CORP. MILLTRONICS MISSION INDUSTRIES MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. MONITOR LABS MOTOROLA, INC. JAMES MULLINS NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP NEAL SUPPLY CO. NETWORK CATALYST, INC NEW ENGLAND WATER ENV. ASSOC. NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS, INC. OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION THE OHMART CORP ORACLE CORPORATION AMOUNT $676.00 $2,115.67 $66.84 $202.39 $109.68 $2,039.51 $1,091.76 $154,345.10 $32.40 $773.98 $1,259.66 $60.25 $78.00 $103.00 $2,771.98 $43,479.26 $453.64 $13,879.52 $80.34 $888.71 $464.10 $871.82 $9,000.00 $488,433.00 $267, 157.10 $177,970.00 $152.64 $1,120.45 $285.32 $71.42 $4,960.00 $176.00 $166.20 $5,973.57 $637.00 $465.71 $4,809.96 $329.49 $219.42 $875.88 $24,422.59 $5.00 $360.00 $2,398.59 $262.26 $8,474.54 PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION TRAINING REGISTRATION GAUGE OFFICE EQUIPMENT TRUCK REPAIRS ELECTRIC PARTS EXPENSE REIMB. SCALES FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 MACHINE SUPPLIES TOOLS CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE CHEMICALS SUBSCRIPTION PRINTER REPAIR SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 ENGINEERING SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES ENVIR. CONSUL TING SERVICES MO 12-9-90 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES SERVICE AGREEMENT WELDING SUPPLIES REMOVE & REPLACE MANHOLES CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2 CONSTRUCTION P1-41, P1-43 CONSTRUCTION P1-40-2(REBID), P2-47-2(REBID) INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FIRST AID KITS PLUMBING SUPPLIES TOOLS MECHANICAL REPAIRS LAB SUPPLIES ELECTRIC SUPPLIES UNIFORM RENTALS INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENT PARTS EXPENSE REIMB. TRAINING VIDEO PLUMBING SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PUBLICATION SOFlWARE TRAINING CLASSES OFFICE SUPPLIES TRAINING VIDEO SOFlWARE c{ ,, FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159549 ORACLE CORPORATION $3,636.00 SOFTWARE 159550 ORANGE COAST PIPE SUPPLY $183.77 PIPE SUPPLIES 159551 ORANGE COUNTY COMPENSATION $35.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 159552 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR & EXPO CTR $75.00 EXHIBIT SPACE FEE 159553 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $878.99 CHEMICALS 159554 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,869.52 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159555 ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. $238.41 FITTINGS 159556 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,778.05 SPECIAL TY GASES 159557 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4,650.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 159558 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $28,658.00 GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93 159559 PBAS $15.00 AUDIO TRAINING TAPE 159560 PSI $116.97 HARDWARE 159561 PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. $20,385.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159562 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. $4,392.43 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159563 PACIFIC BELL $53.88 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159564 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $333.81 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159565 PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC. $187.09 TIRES 159566 PARTS UNLIMITED $40.93 TRUCK PARTS 159567 R.F. PAULUS, INC $71,298.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-7A 159568 PENN WILSON, GNG $100,597.98 CNG FUELING STATION MO 1/24/96 159569 CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY $446.76 REIMB. PETTY CASH 159570 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC. $170,544.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 3-29-95 159571 PITNEY BOWES $4.417.75 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 159572 US FILTER/POL YMETRICS INC $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 159573 POL YPURE, INC. $46,045.12 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 159574 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $24.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159575 POWER SYSTEMS $29.11 SPRING 159576 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 159577 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $3,857.00 SOILS TESTING 159578 PUTZMEISTER, INC. $1,589.41 PUMP PARTS 159579 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $687.31 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 159580 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $478.25 LAB SUPPLIES 159581 RANCHO AUTO WASH $378.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 159582 REAL TIME $2,386.00 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES 159583 RED WING SHOES $241.37 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 159584 BOLT DELIVERY $103.00 FREIGHT 159585 THE REGISTER $452.80 NOTICES & ADS 159586 REISH MARINE STUDIES, INC. $200.00 OCEAN MONITORING 159587 REMEDY TEMP $27,425.86 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 159588 RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL $15.00 PUBLICATION 159589 SARNOFF DEPOSITION SERVICE, INC $392.00 DEPOSITION SERVICES 159590 SAVAtfr AUDIO VISUAL $359.80 PUBLICATION 159591 SCHWING AMERICA, INC. $572.06 PUMP PARTS 159592 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT'L $31,142.54 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-8-94 159593 SCIENTIFIC REFRIGERATION $160.00 SERVICE CALL 159594 SCOTT SPECIAL TY GASES, INC. $478.33 SPECIAL TY GASES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159595 159596 159597 159598 159599 159600 159601 159602 159603 159604 159605 159606 159607 159608 159609 159610 159611 159612 159613 159614 159615 159616 159617 159618 159619 159620 159621 159622 159623 159624 159625 159626 159627 159628 159629 159630 159631 159632 159633 159634 159635 159636 159637 159638 159639 159640 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97 VENDOR CITY OF SEAL BEACH CITY OF SEAL BEACH SEARS ROEBUCK & CO SECOND-SUN SHAMROCK SUPPLY SIEMON, LARSEN & MARSH SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. SKILL PATH SEMINARS SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY SNAP·ON TOOLS CORP. SO CALIF A/C DISTRIBUTORS SO CALIF EDISON CO STAMINET INC STANDARD SUPP & EQUIP CO INC STEVEN ENTERPRISES STREET SMART SUCCESSORIES SUMMIT STEEL SUNSET FORD SUPELCO, INC. SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS SUPERIOR PLATING SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. TPC TRAINING SYSTEMS THOMAS SCIENTIFIC THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE TORNELL & COTTEN TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL TRADE SERVICE CORP TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY, INC. TROPITONJ: FURNITURE TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC. TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY TRUESOAIL LABS JG TUCKER & SON, INC. TULE RANCH/MAGAN FARMS DANIEL TUNNICLIFF TURBINE SPECIALTIES INC TUTHILL CORPORATION UNITED PARCEL SERVICE WIR SCIENTIFIC VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO. INC. VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. AMOUNT $75.90 $360.04 $213.57 $471.56 $1,999.53 $3,740.00 $725.00 $198.00 $180.78 $1,841.36 $102.36 $50,072.46 $3,847.77 $135.25 $663.52 $2,564.45 $570.63 $9,746.86 $2,326.85 $1,081.02 $41.24 $175.00 $458.89 $7 40,570.40 $249.91 $189.84 $3,377.75 $36.78 $358.53 $916.00 $3,208.82 $1,925.28 $450.00 $670.00 $169.39 $20.56 $1,007.00 $2,173.32 $86,377.87 $1,249.39 $13,413.56 $216.14 $63.68 $13,733.78 $88.75 $533.36 PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION WATER USE WATER USE MICROWAVE OFFICE SUPPLIES TOOLS LEGAL SERVICES LAB SUPPLIES SEMINAR REGISTRATION PLUMBING SUPPLIES TOOLS PUBLICATION POWER PRINTERS OVERHAUL KIT REPAIR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT FRAMES METAL TRUCK PARTS LAB SUPPLIES PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES SUBSCRIPTION OVERPAYMENT REFUND CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, P2-55 TRAINING SOFTWARE IMAGING CHAMBER MECHANICAL PARTS CABLE SERVICES LOCKS&KEYS LEGAL SERVICES INSTRUMENT PARTS ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 REFUND TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS LAB SERVICES INSTRUMENT PARTS RESIDUALS REMOVAL EXPENSE REIMB. TURBINE MAINTENANCE TURBINE SUPPLIES PARCEL SERVICES LAB SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159641 159642 159643 159644 159645 159646 159647 159648 159649 159650 159651 159652 159653 159654 159655 159656 159657 159658 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97 VENDOR VALVATE ASSOCIATES VARKEL CONSTRUCTION INC. VERTEX BUSINESS INTERIORS VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. WACKENHUT CORP. WATERS CORPORATION WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE WESTERN MEDICAL CENTER WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY WHATMAN WILLARD MARKING DEVICES INC. WITEG XEROX CORP. YALE/CHASE MATERIAL HANDLING GEORGE YARDLEY CO. ZEE SERVICE CO TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 SUMMARY #1 OPERFUND #20PERFUND #2 CAP FAC FUND #30PERFUND #3 CAP FAC FUND #50PERFUND #SOPER FUND #70PERFUND #11 OPER FUND #11 CAP FAC FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #5&6 CAP FAC FUND #6&7 OPER FUND #7&14 OPER FUND JTOPERFUND CORF SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT $2,864.10 $27,076.50 $318.82 $1,078.96 $8,955.88 $624.58 $384.69 $946.55 $63.00 $502.12 $35,541.60 $502.06 $40.30 $667.57 $3,955.55 $664.86 $582.49 $466.02 $3,654,453.98 AMOUNT $253.80 $5,298.01 $71,421.28 $29,417.33 $3,701.09 $2,671.68 $1,323.93 $3,885.38 $5,068.12 $20.18 $4,276.82 $50.61 $1,904.83 $3,856.22 $867,353.30 $2,434, 124.01 $24,032.97 $195, 794.42 $3,654,453.98 PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION VALVE CONSTRUCTION J-11-2 OFFICE FURNITURE FIBER OPTICS CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS SERVICE AGREEMENT JANITORIAL SUPPLIES WIND SOC SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTION RECONCILIATION REFUND CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES COPIER LEASES YOKE ASSEMBLY LAB SUPPLIES FIRST AID KITS FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159678 159679 159680 159681 159682 159683 159684 159685 159686 159687 159688 159689 159690 159691 159692 159693 159694 159695 159696 159697 159698 159699 159700 159701 159702 159703 159704 159705 159706 159707 159708 159709 159710 159711 159712 159713 159714 159715 159716 159717 159718 159719 159720 159721 159722 159723 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97 VENDOR AMS (ACOUSTICAL MAIL SERV) ARMA INTERNATIONAL AT & T,. .CELLULAR CR & R AT & T -CELLULAR CR & R AT & T -CELLULAR CR & R ADVANCED WORKPLACE STRATEGIES, INC. A'WNA ACADEMIC PRESS AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS ALLIED PACKING & RUBBER INC ALPHA RESEARCH GROUP AMERICAN COMPENSATION ASSOC AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. ASSOC. OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES ANTHONY PEST CONTROL APEX COMMUNICATONS A-PLUS SYSTEMS ACS (APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES ARIZONA INSTRUMENT AWARDS & TROPHIES BALLANTYNE COMPUTER SERVICE BC WIRE ROPE & RIGGING BAR TECH TELECOM, INC. BATTERY SPECIAL TIES BELL PIPE & SUPPLY BIO-GRO DIVISION BLACK & VEATCH CCI TECHNOLOGIES CEM CORPORATION CH2M HILL CPI -THE ALTERNATIVE CRG MARINE LAB CS COMPANY CAL TROL, INC. CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE CALIF SEA GRANT COLLEGE SYS CAMAUCORP. CAMAUCORP. CAMP DRESSER & MC KEE INC CANUS CORPORATION CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. CLA-VAL COMPANY CLOSSON & CLOSSON COLICH & SONS AMOUNT $37.50 $320.00 $7.82 $26.42 $4.06 $99.00 $43.00 $19.95 $1,232.52 $18,666.45 $9,285.78 $9,320.00 $155.00 $935.00 $425.00 $790.00 $2,058.02 $6,818.24 $5,907.32 $393.99 $1,538.13 $15.73 $550.00 $995.35 $650.00 $2,540.55 $299.29 $39,344.88 $557.61 $1,801.00 $562.50 $20,198.68 $284.46 $4,625.00 $428.99 $290.93 $325.36 $24.00 $1,300.00 $2,175.00 $24,692.00 $2,425.00 $3,220.00 $128.96 $330.00 $61,262.00 PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION OFFICE PANEL PUBLICATIONS , LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE 0 SERVICES LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES D.O.T. TRAINING PROGRAM PUBLICATIONS PUBLICATIONS SPECIAL TY GASSES O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN. SYST. M.0.8-9-89 VALVE PARTS ON-SITE TRAINING MEMBERSHIP TRAINING REGISTRATION CONFERENCE REGISTRATION SERVICE AGREEMENT EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION NOTICES & ADS COMPUTER SOFlWARE PUMP PARTS INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES PLAQUES CONSULTING SERVICES ROPE TELEPHONE INSTALLATION BATTERIES PLUMBING SUPPLIES RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-46 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT LAB SUPPLIES ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 LAB SUPPLIES OCEAN MONITORING PLUMBING SUPPLIES HARDWARE SERVICE AGREEMENT PUBLICATIONS SERVICE AGREEMENT SERVICE AGREEMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES FIBER OPTIC CABLE OFFICE FURNITURE VALVE REPAIR LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159724 159725 159726 159727 159728 159729 159730 159731 159732 159733 159734 159735 159736 159737 159738 159739 159740 159741 159742 159743 159744 159745 159746 159747 159748 159749 159750 159751 159752 159753 159754 159755 159756 159757 159758 159759 159760 159761 159762 159763 159764 159765 159766 159767 159768 159769 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97 VENDOR JOHN COLLINS JAMES E. COLSTON COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP COMMUNITY ACTION\EAP COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA CONFIDENTIAL MGMT SERVICES CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST COPELCO CAPITAL CORE LABORATORIES, INC. COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER CRANE PRO SERVICES CA & THE WORLD OCEAN 97 DAILY PILOT DAY-TIMERS, INC. DELL MARKETING L. P. DEL MAR ANALYTICAL DETECTOR ELECTRONICS DIAMOND H RECOGNITION DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. DUNN EDWARDS CORP. ENS RESOURCES INC EDINGER MEDICAL GROUP INC J.D. EDWARDS LINDA EISMAN ELECTRA-BOND, INC. EMERGENCY MGMT NElWORK ENCHANTER, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. FIBERTRON FILTER SUPPLY CO. BAILEY FISCHER & PORTER FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. FLO-SYSTEMS INC. FOLSOM LAKE FORD FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA FRANKLIN QUEST CO. FRAZEE PAINT & WALLCOVERING FRY'S ELECTRONICS GST, INC. GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. GETINGE-CASTLE GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. AMOUNT $76.18 $139.51 $8,328.70 $950.00 $3,943.19 $6,045.20 $8,296.75 $1,432.00 $800.00 $118.39 $209.00 $1,985.00 $110.00 $38.50 $31.40 $63,506.81 $3,076.00 $76.45 $169.67 $20,943.60 $28.19 $1,169.04 $609.00 $27,580.75 $443.50 $2,537.51 $4,115.00 $2,100.00 $1,030.35 $144.21 $2,562.94 $797.07 $1,878.06 $1,278.59 $9,577.30 $31,348.30 $1,730.80 $105.40 $217.17 $200.42 $204.66 $1,995.62 $1,540.83 $5,527.86 $502.02 $26,579.26 PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION EXPENSE REIMB. EXPENSE REIMB. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRICT EAP -JUNE 97 PUMP PARTS INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES ELECTRIC PARTS COLOR COPIER LEASE LAB SUPPLIES TRUCK PARTS TECHNICAL TRAINING CRANE PARTS PUBLICATION NOTICES & ADS OFFICE SUPPLIES COMPUTERS BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS LAMP SERVICE AWARDS OFFICE EQUIPMENT PAINT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WORKERS COMP SOFlWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7-24-96 EXPENSE REIMB. EQUIPMENT REPAIR CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95 LAB SERVICES AIRFREIGHT FIBER OPTIC CABLE FILTERS CHLORINATION SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS TRUCKS OIL ABSORBANT PHOTO SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PAINT ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CHEMICALS TELEPHONE SERVICES VALVE PUMP PARTS FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159770 159771 159772 159773 159774 159775 159776 159777 159778 159779 159780 159781 159782 159783 159784 159785 159786 159787 159788 159789 159790 159791 159792 159793 159794 159795 159796 159797 159798 159799 159800 159801 159802 159803 159804 159805 159806 159807 159808 159809 159810 159811 159812 159813 159814 159815 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97 VENDOR GLOBAL EQUIPMENT WW GRAINGER PARTS OPER GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS GRASBY S.T.I. GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING DGA CONSULTANTS HACH COMPANY KEVIN HADDEN HATCH & KIRK, INC. PL HAWN CO, INC. JAMES D. HERBERG HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE HOLMES & NARVER, INC. HOME DEPOT HYATT DIE CASTING IBM IPCOSAFETY IMAGING PLUS ITA, INC-TOSHIBA ACCESSORIES INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS INTERSTATE BATIERY SYSTEMS IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT ISCO, INC. J2 PRINTING SERVICES JH RECOGNITION CO. JAMISON ENGINEERING GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY JAY'S CATERING JOBS AVAILABLE APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES LAB SYSTEMS LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC. LANTRONIX LASHER AUTO CENTER LAW/CRANDAL, INC. LEE & RO CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, INC. LEXIS-NEXIS K.P. LINDSTROM, INC. LOS ANGELES TIMES MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. MPS MSA MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS, INC. LESLIE MARELL, ATTORNEY/LAW AMOUNT $2,064.36 $156.80 $668.59 $1,518.67 $735.15 $4,355.00 $1,718.52 $301.78 $5,426.70 $1,157.60 $184.25 $81.89 $8,215.38 $150.60 $519.00 $324.00 $3,826.42 $1,593.13 $527.95 $358.26 $2,427.92 $48.82 $232.74 $1,328.56 $356.48 $6,920.00 $1,415.84 $916.64 $170.00 $858.51 $1,918.60 $5,100.00 $118.17 $2,656.00 $13,299.76 $270.00 $4,478.32 $264.50 $10,894.57 $176.80 $6,000.00 $11.86 $1,594.13 $529.48 $1,397.23 $300.00 PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION WORKBENCH FAN PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES ENGINE PARTS PRINTING SURVEYING SERVICES M:0.6-8-94 LAB SUPPLIES EXPENSE REIMB. TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC SUPPLIES EXPENSE REIMB. TRUCK PARTS ENGINEERING SERVICES SMALL HARDWARE NON COMPLIANCE USER REFUND SERVICE AGREEMENT SAFETY SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES BATIERY PACKS CONNECTORS BATIERIES WATER USE INSTRUMENT PRINTING SERVICE AWARD PINS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE NOTICES & ADS MACHINE SUPPLIES TOOLS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT LAB SUPPLIES ELECTRIC SUPPLIES TRUCK SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 ENGINEERING SERVICES SUBSCRIPTION ENVIR. CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90 SUBSCRIPTION OCEAN MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES SENSOR WELDING SUPPLIES MECHANICAL SUPPLIES ON-SITE TRAINING FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159816 159817 159818 159819 159820 159821 159822 159823 159824 159825 159826 159827 159828 159829 159830 159831 159832 159833 159834 159835 159836 159837 159838 159839 159840 159841 159842 159843 159844 159845 159846 159847 159848 159849 159850 159851 159852 159853 159854 159855 159856 159857 159858 159859 159860 159861 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 05/25/97 VENDOR MARVAC ELECTRONICS DONALD F. MCINTYRE MCJUNKIN CORP MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY CO MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP MONITOR LABS, INC. MONTGOMERY WATSON MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC NABISCO NATIONAL ENVIRO. INFO. SERV. NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER NAT WEST MARKETS NEAL SUPPLY CO. NElWORK CATALYST, INC NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS, INC. NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY NORTHWEST NATIONAL LIFE OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION OFFICE PAVILIONS/INTERIOR RESOURCES ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY ORANGE VALVE & FITIING CO. OXYGEN SERVICE COUNTY OF ORANGE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. PACIFIC BELL PAGENET PARKER SUPPLY CO PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC. KIMC.PATION PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC. PINNACLE MICRO POLYPURE, INC. POSTMASTER POWER DESIGN AMOUNT $11.85 $532.23 $512.08 $3,190.76 $940.48 $596.00 $6,688.76 $117.27 $603.40 $1,591.10 $13,000.00 $2,880.17 $213.00 $210.00 $61.00 $4,143.04 $985.00 $70,445.97 $661.05 $43,567.16 $2,597.00 $19,829.72 $18,710.71 $1,025.13 $2,490.60 $859.46 $1,032.22 $4,261.88 $1,844.93 $4,740.00 $41,705.40 $403.50 $3,452.44 $5.95 $1,310.06 $657.03 $1,239.14 $1,151.71 $1,208.00 $143.47 $2,217.53 $171,431.94 $1,032.05 $44,443.70 $172.00 $4,849.35 PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES PHONE & EXPENSE REIMB. PLUMBING SUPPLIES TOOLS INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES MECHANICAL REPAIRS SAFETY SUPPLIES OFFICE TRAILER LEASE INSTRUMENT PARTS AIR TOXICS PROJECT M.0.12-12-90 PUMP PARTS MEMBERSHIP PERMIT FEE REFUND PUBLICATION SAFETY FILM RENTALS TRAINING REGISTRATION COP INTEREST DRAW FEES PLUMBING SUPPLIES COMPUTER SUPPLIES SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL DISTRICT LTD & STD -JUNE 97 SAFETY GLASSES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS CHEMICALS FITIINGS SPECIAL TY GASES ADMINISTRATIVE FEE GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93 PLUMBING SUPPLIES INSTRUMENT PARTS MECHANICAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE SERVICES RENTAL EQUIPMENT FLOW INDICATOR TIRES EXPENSE REIMB. LAB SUPPLIES REIMB. PETTY CASH RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 3-29-95 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 PO BOX RENTAL ELECTRICAL REPAIRS < .l .. FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159862 159863 159864 159865 159866 159867 159868 159869 159870 159871 159872 159873 159874 159875 159876 159877 159878 159879 159880 159881 159882 159883 159884 159885 159886 159887 159888 159889 159890 159891 159892 159893 159894 159895 159896 159897 159898 159899 159900 159901 159902 159903 159904 159905 159906 159907 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97 VENDOR POWER MAINTENANCE INTER, INC MIKE PRLICH & SONS PRYOR RESOURCES, INC. PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC PUTZMEISTER, INC. R & R INSTRUMENTS RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. RANCHO AUTO WASH RAND MATERIALS HANDLING REAL TIME BOLT DELIVERY RELIABLE POWER METERS REMEDY TEMP RUSH ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES SFIC/NAT ASSOC METAL FINISH SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY SKCWEST SANCON ENGINEERING, INC. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN SCHWING AMERICA, INC. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INrL STEVEN ANDREWS ENGINEERING SCOTT SPECIAL TY GASES, INC. SEWER EQUIP CO OF FLORIDA SHAMROCK SUPPLY SHASTA ELECTRIC SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. JEFFSHUBIK SHURELUCK SALES LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD SILBER SKILL PATH SEMINARS SOUTH COAST SEA FOODS INC. SOUTH COAST WATER SOUTHERN CALIF COASTAL WATER SO. CAL. GAS. CO. SO. CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. SOUTHERN STEEL BREA CENTER SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER SPRINT SUMMIT STEEL SUPELCO, INC. TAYLOR-DUNN MFG. COMPANY TEXAS COMMERCE BANK THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE AMOUNT $912.00 $249,606.00 $228.00 $184.66 $308.44 $66.10 $4,170.65 $360.00 $91.09 $191.25 $99.00 $100.00 $23,749.41 $6,925.00 $500.00 $18,000.00 $1,710.71 $1,850.00 $160.00 $82.02 $86,021.28 $2,830.00 $1,353.75 $216.74 $258.60 $94,243.40 $1,578.69 $403.70 $5,636.16 $450.00 $199.00 $210.00 $195.00 $300,000.00 $20,445.12 $880.00 $75.00 $2,047.22 $31.20 $1,901.11 $470.81 $157.57 $6,818.41 $867.59 $2,450.57 $218.80 PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION BATTERY REPAIR CONSTRUCTION 3-35R-1 TRAINING REGISTRATION MECHANICAL SUPPLIES PUMP PARTS ELECTRIC PARTS TRASH REMOVAL TRUCK WASH TICKETS FREIGHT INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES FREIGHT SOFTWARE UPGRADE TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLICATION TIN-TDS STUDY SAFETY SUPPLIES ENGINEERING SERVICES TRAINING REGISTRATION PUMP PARTS OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-8-94 ENGINEERING SERVICES SPECIAL TY GASES HOSE TOOLS CONSTRUCTION J-31-2 RETENTION RELEASE TRUCK PARTS EXPENSE REIMB. TOOLS/HARDWARE LEGAL SERVICES SEMINAR REGISTRATION PERMIT FEE REFUND LAB SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP NATURAL GAS RENTAL EQUIPMENT PERMIT FEE REFUND DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES METAL LAB SUPPLIES ELECTRIC CART PARTS COP TRUSTEE SERVICES MECHANICAL PARTS PRINTER SUPPLIES LOCKS &KEYS FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159908 159909 159910 159911 159912 159913 159914 159915 159916 159917 159918 159919 159920 159921 159922 159923 159924 159925 159926 159927 159928 159929 159930 159931 159932 159933 159934 159935 159936 159937 159938 159939 159940 159941 159942 159943 159944 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06125/97 POSTING DATE 06125/97 VENDOR AEROFUND FINANCIAL/TOP HAT TORNELL & COTTON TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. EDITH TRAN TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY, INC. TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC. JG TUCKER & SON, INC. TULE RANCH/MAGAN FARMS ULTRA SCIENTIFIC UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER UNITED PARCEL SERVICE DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO UNIVERSITY OF CA. REGENTS URBAN WATER INSTITUTE VPPPA VWR SCIENTIFIC VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO. INC. VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC. VARKEL CONSTRUCTION INC VERNE'S PLUMBING VERTEX BUSINESS INTERIORS VILLAGE NURSERIES VISION SERVICE PLAN -(CA) WASTE MARKETS WATERS CORPORATION WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAYNE ELECTRIC WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. WESTSIDE BLDG MATERIAL CORP WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC. WILLIAM T & LYNN S WHITE & CHARLES F. WINSOR WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART XEROX CORP. GARY YOUNG TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 AMOUNT $231.45 $1,154.00 $130.41 $311.27 $3,973.76 $222.57 $2,034.46 $34,249.19 $113.00 $152.16 $21.48 $94.00 $15.00 $150.00 $400.00 $6,728.16 $613.74 $247.28 $1,254.79 $34,230.30 $1,470.00 $571.51 $187.95 $7,614.60 $63,986.02 $1,067.64 $932.44 $350.19 $25,554.72 $306.12 $1,039.58 $505.91 15,000.00 $806.25 $99,686.72 $9,840.45 $300.00 $2,209,326.08 PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION MEETING EXPENSE LEGAL SERVICES TRUCK PARTS EXPENSE REIMB. CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 TRUCK PARTS INSTRUMENT PARTS RESIDUALS REMOVAL LAB SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PARCEL SERVICES OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE PUBLICATION TRAINING REGISTRATION TRAINING REGISTRATION LAB SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION J-11-2 RETENTION RELEASE PLUMBING SERVICES OFFICE FURNITURE LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES VISION PLAN PREMIUM -JUNE 97 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3-27-96 SERVICE AGREEMENT JANITORIAL SUPPLIES MOTOR CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES TOOLS INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES CLAIM SETTLEMENT EXPENSE REIMB. LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95 COPIER LEASES MOVE LAB EQUIPMENT FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97 VENDOR SUMMARY #1 OPERFUND #1 CONST FUND #20PERFUND #2 CONST FUND #30PERFUND #3 CAP FAC FUND #3 CONST FUND #50PERFUND #5 CAP FAC FUND #5 CONST FUND #60PERFUND #6 CONST FUND #70PERFUND #7 CONST FUND #11 OPER FUND #11 CAP FAC FUND #11 CONST FUND #13 CONST FUND #14 OPER FUND #14 CONST FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #5&6 CAP FAC FUND #6&7 OPER FUND #7&14 OPER FUND JTOPERFUND CORF SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT AMOUNT $3,294.88 $6,523.30 $13,195.09 $18,492.06 $19,827.38 $254,138.00 $19,985.52 $2,127.65 $153.60 $5,973.82 $1,320.95 $4,874.86 $3,295.82 $6,910.75 $2,004.98 $69,023.90 $6,037.22 $239.52 $461.00 $1,408.92 $17.16 $456.40 $216.49 $828.58 $776,271. 71 $446,441.28 $27,919.24 $517,886.00 $2,209,326.08 PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 159964 159965 159966 159967 159968 159969 159970 159971 159972 159973 159974 159975 159976 159977 159978 159979 159980 159981 159982 159983 159984 159985 159986 159987 159988 159989 159990 159991 159992 159993 159994 159995 159996 159997 159998 159999 160000 160001 160002 160003 160004 160005 160006 160007 160008 160009 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 VENDOR ABM BUSINESS MACHINES, INC. AMA/PADGETT-THOMPSON ARMA INTERNATIONAL ASTD (AM SOC FOR TRNG & DVLPn ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. AIR DUCT CLEANING AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS AIRBORNE EXPRESS ALADDIN HOUSE AMERICAN AIRLINES AMERICAN CRANE INSTITUTE AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC AMERICAN RED CROSS AMERICAN SIGMA AMSA BLAKE P. ANDERSON A-PLUS SYSTEMS ARENS INDUSTRIES, INC. ARGO ELECTRIC SUPPLY ARMOR-VAC ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING BSCI (BALLANTYNE COMPUT SRV) BANANA BLUEPRINT BAR TECH TELECOM, INC. BARCO PRODUCTS CO BARNEBY-SUTCLIFFE CORP. LAYNE BAROLDI BELL PIPE & SUPPLY CO ELOISE BENSON ANGIE BERDANIS 810-GRO DIVISION BLACK & VEATCH BLACK BOX CORP BLOOMBERG L.P. BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. BUDGET JANITORIAL BURLINGTON SAFETY LAB INC. CRG MARINE LAB CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES AMOUNT $323.52 $695.00 $140.00 $180.00 $561 ,093.90 $6,256.00 $56,026.03 $9.44 $162.45 $3,438.48 $2,975.00 $552.24 $2,900.00 $99.00 $5,808.40 $3,757.61 $675.00 $129.37 $8,079.63 $2,461.53 $102.52 $450.00 $105.00 $858.54 $440.00 $3,094.41 $6,171.87 $798.37 $263.22 $106.69 $3,011.62 $1,500.00 $245.00 $38,721.11 $430.27 $475.68 $4,994.21 $193.95 $4,531.93 $327.25 $3,085.00 $207.00 $500.00 $101.29 $997.56 $666.00 PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION TOOLS SEMINAR REGISTRATION MEMBERSHIP MEMBERSHIPS CONSTRUCTION J-34-1, P2-35-5 AIR DUCT CLEANING SERVICES O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN. SYST. M.0.8-9-89 AIRFREIGHT WINDOW BLINDS TRAVEL SERVICES ON -SITE TRAINING SEMINAR REGISTRATION TRAINING REGISTRATION PUBLICATION SAFETY VIDEO'S & MANUELS MECHANICAL SUPPLIES TRAINING REGISTRATION EXPENSE REIMB. NOTICES & ADS INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ELECTRIC PARTS VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES WASTE OIL REMOVAL PAYROLL SERVICES CONSUL TING SERVICES PRINTING M.0.11-07-94 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT FILTER MEDIA EXPENSE REIMB. VALVE PARTS PERMIT FEE EXPENSE REIMB. RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-46 TOOLS FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.4-14-93 TRUCK REPAIRS ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18 I INSTRUMENT JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 TESTING OCEAN MONITORING LAB SUPPLIES SERVICE AGREEMENT MOVING SERVICES < '/ FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 160010 160011 160012 160013 160014 160015 160016 160017 160018 160019 160020 160021 160022 160023 160024 160025 160026 160027 160028 160029 160030 160031 160032 160033 160034 160035 160036 160037 160038 160039 160040 160041 160042 160043 160044 160045 160046 160047 160048 160049 160050 160051 160052 160053 160054 160055 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 VENDOR CALLAN ASSOCIATES, INC. CALOL YMPIC GLOVE & SAFETY CAMP DRESSER & MC KEE INC CANUS CORPORATION CAROLLO ENGINEERS RICHARD CASTILLON CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. CHAPMAN COUNSELING CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION COUCH & SONS COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA COMPUCOM SYSTEMS COMPUCOM COMPUTERS AMERICA COMPUSERVE JAMES CONG CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST CONSUMER PIPE CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC. CDS/NEDCO COOPER CAMERON CORP. CORPORATE EXPRESS COUNCIL ON EDUCATION COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CHARLES P. CROWLEY, CO. CUTLER HAMMER JAN DEBAY DELL MARKETING L. P. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOC. DUNKEL BROS MACH MOVING DUNN EDWARDS CORP. ELECTRIC MACHINERY ELECTRA-BONO, INC. ENCHANTER, INC. MARK ESQUER DANNY EVANGELISTA FMC CORPORATION FST SAND AND GRAVEL, INC. FAMILY HEALTH PLAN FIBERTRON AMOUNT $7,300.00 $1,137.65 $370,707.00 $4,189.86 $72,525.47 $1,201.28 $28,092.44 $2,196.00 $1,980.00 $1,615.94 $37,727.97 $8,328.70 $10,310.60 $27,803.48 $216.61 $1,576.41 $1, 171.35 $960.38 $78.18 $5,185.03 $2,419.70 $3,195.94 $61.64 $90,661.76 $5,784.45 $295.00 $2,232.15 $901.62 $300.11 $63.68 $27,436.91 $37,120.71 $426.20 $4,640.00 $1, 136,091.00 $600.00 $109.65 $1,787.57 $969.75 $5,600.00 $586.55 $284.17 $293,876.44 $240.86 $34,394.08 $2,387.90 PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION INVESTMENT ADVICE SERVICES SAFETY SUPPLIES ENGINEERING SERVICES FIBER OPTIC CABLE ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95 EXPENSE REIMB. OFFICE FURNITURE ON-SITE TRAINING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOFlWARE CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUMP PARTS COMPUTER PARTS COMPUTER PARTS COMPUTER SUPPLIES COMPUTER SERVICES EXPENSE REIMB. TRUCK PARTS ELECTRIC PARTS PLUMBING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES ELECTRIC PARTS ENGINE PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES SEMINAR REGISTRATION ELECTRIC PARTS INSTRUMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT REPAIR DIRECTORS EXPENSE REIMB. COMPUTERS DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN SERVICE CHARGE INSPECTION SERVICES PROPERTY INSURANCE MO 5-13-92, 6-10-92 MOVING SERVICES PAINT SUPPLIES ELECTRIC PARTS EQUIPMENT REPAIR OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95 EXPENSE REIMB. EXPENSE REIMB. HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-14-94 ROAD BASE MATERIALS MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM FIBER OPTIC CABLE ·c:.. , .,. FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 160056 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $547.80 FILTERS 160057 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE $360.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160058 BAILEY FISCHER & PORTER CO. $756.34 ROLL CHARTS 160059 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1,155.98 ELECTRIC PARTS 160060 FLAT & VERTICAL, INC. $703.00 CONCRETE CUTIING 160061 FLO-SYSTEMS INC. $1,279.00 PUMP PARTS 160062 FLOV\IERS BY CINA $91.59 FLOWERS (DECEASED EMPLOYEE) 160063 FORMA SYSTEMS $9,600.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160064 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $2,986.75 WATER USE 160065 THE FOXBORO CO. $219.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 160066 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $111.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160067 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $2,102.37 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES 160068 GST, INC. $2,643.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160069 GARRATI-CALLAHAN COMPANY $6,133.67 CHEMICALS 160070 TOM GAWORSKI $215.15 EXPENSE REIMB. 160071 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,172.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES 160072 GEORGETOWN PUBLISHING $97.00 PUBLICATION 160073 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $54.00 LAB SUPPLIES 160074 VWJ GRAINGER, INC. $1,265.08 COMPRESSOR PARTS 160075 GRASBY S.T.I. $2,697.62 ENGINE PARTS 160076 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $229.68 PRINTING 15oon DGA CONSULTANTS $7,600.03 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 160078 HACH COMPANY $1,104.34 LAB SUPPLIES 160079 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $914.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 160080 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,451.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 160081 PL HAWN CO, INC. $27.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 160082 HELLO DIRECT, INC. $219.93 TELEPHONE HEADSET 160083 HERB'S BLACK FOREST BAKERY $76.40 CATERING SERVICES 160084 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 160085 HEWLETT PACKARD CO $336.41 TOOLS 160086 HUNSAKER & ASSOC IRVINE, INC $4,206.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160087 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,567.09 WATER USE 160088 IDEXX $659.97 LAB SUPPLIES 160089 IPCOSAFETY $19,942.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES 160090 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $78.66 CONNECTORS 160091 INGERSOLL-RAND EQUIP CORP $12,056.15 COMPRESSOR 160092 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $223.95 TRUCK PARTS 160093 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $2.90 WATER USE 160094 JAMISON ENGINEERING, INC. $27,080.27 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 160095 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $452.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 160096 JAY'S CATERING $253.00 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 160097 JENSEN TOOLS INC $450.35 VACUUM 160098 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $933.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 160099 JOINT INSTRUMENTATION COMMITIEE $25.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 160100 KAISER PERMANENTE $24,027.23 MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM 160101 KEENAN SUPPLY $15.21 WELDING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 160102 160103 160104 160105 160106 160107 160108 160109 160110 160111 160112 160113 160114 160115 160116 160117 160118 160119 160120 160121 160122 160123 160124 160125 160126 160127 160128 160129 160130 160131 160132 160133 160134 160135 160136 160137 160138 160139 160140 160141 160142 160143 160144 160145 160146 160147 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 VENDOR KELAR CORPORATION KELLY WRIGHT HARDWOODS KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES KOA, INC. VLADIMIR KOGAN LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. LAW/CRANDAL, INC. JOHN M LEAVELL P E LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. LEXIS-NEXIS LIEBERT CASSIDY & FRIERSON MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS, INC. MARDEN SUSCO INC. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. MARVAC ELECTRONICS MCJUNKIN CORP MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO MEASUREMENT VARIABLES, INC. MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. METRA HEALTH MISSlON INDUSTRIES MONITOR LABS MONTGOMERY WATSON MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES NEAL SUPPLY CO. NElWORK CATALYST, INC NEW HERMES INC NEWARK ELECTRONICS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE NWLAND/OR 01 CORPORATION OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION OPTIO SOFTWARE INC ORANGE COAST PETROLEUM EQUIP THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE OXYGEN SERVICE AMOUNT $6,320.00 $2,362.62 $140,455.07 $53.90 $1,659.79 $510.31 $1,300.70 $2,056.36 $5,385.70 $5,015.00 $24,110.08 $277.50 $15,000.00 $35,280.00 $1,314.55 $112.49 $1,062, 154.00 $446,224.86 $124,290.00 $152.54 $667.26 $182.88 $269.86 $1,084.28 $136,324.72 $3,737.48 $1,591.10 $29,250.00 $788.38 $25,790.00 $3,079.93 $2,733.36 $81.20 $75.26 $51.35 $9,690.00 $9,760.48 $362.52 $1,197.90 $15,270.00 $307.09 $25.00 $4,892.10 $1,049.55 $2,000.00 $263.68 PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION ON-SITE TRAINING PLYWOOD FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 MACHINE PARTS TOOLS PERMIT FEE REFUND EXPENSE REIMB. CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 ON-SITE TRAINING ENGINEERING SERVICES SUBSCRIPTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MECHANICAL SUPPLIES VALVE PARTS CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES PLUMBING SUPPLIES TOOLS FILTERS INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM UNIFORM RENTALS INSTRUMENT AIR TOXICS PROJECT MO 12-12-90 PUMP PARTS VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES PLUMBING SUPPLIES COMPUTER SUPPLIES PLASTIC FOR ENGRAVING MACHINE INSTRUMENT PARTS WATER USE LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM LAB SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SOFTWARE FUEL NOZZLE SEMINAR REGISTRATION INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FITTINGS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL TY GASES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 160148 160149 160150 160151 160152 160153 160154 160155 160156 160157 160158 160159 160160 160161 160162 160163 160164 160165 160166 160167 160168 160169 160170 160171 160172 160173 160174 160175 160176 160177 160178 160179 160180 160181 160182 160183 160184 160185 160186 160187 160188 160189 160190 160191 160192 160193 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 VENDOR COUNTY OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PSOC (POOL SUPPLY OF QC) PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. PACIFIC BELL PAN ENERGY TRADING & MARKET PARTS UNLIMITED PENN WELL PUBLISHING CO PERMASEAL CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC. POL YPURE, INC. POWER MAINTENANCE INTER. INC PUTZMEISTER, INC. QMC RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS R & R INSTRUMENTS THE REGISTER MARCY ROTHENBERG SCAP SETACPRESS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO RONALD E SALEM PSY D SAVANT AUDIO VISUAL SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INrL SCIENTIFIC REFRIGERATION SHAMROCK SUPPLY SHURELUCK SALES SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY SOUTH COAST WATER SO CALIF EDISON CO SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SER SO. CALIF. WATER CO. SUMMIT STEEL SUNSET FORD SUPELCO, INC. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. SYMCAS, INC. TVS CONSULTING TAYLOR-DUNN MFG. COMPANY TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS A TINT OF CLASS TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE AMOUNT $3,360.00 $5,120.11 $135.32 $1,121.38 $6,027.63 $21.73 $115,794.90 $280.54 $938.76 $7,873.22 $1,788.99 $83,624.80 $23,245.90 $1,433.00 sn9.34 $295.79 $53,1n.33 $73.89 $499.80 $787.50 $24,000.00 $53.00 $17,622.20 $125.00 $1,509.63 $9,384.84 $2,016.25 $2,427.79 $1,654.41 $255.00 $84.76 $350.00 $56,541.20 $2,050.52 $113.24 $371.49 $383.27 $826.71 $791,522.10 $285.00 $200.00 $230.80 $882.75 $36.78 $3,188.25 $249.88 PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION PERMITS REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP OPERATING SUPPLIES PLUMBING SUPPLIES INSTRUMENT PARTS TELEPHONE SERVICES NATURAL GAS TRUCK PARTS PUBLICATIONS LUBE OIL REIMB. PETTY CASH RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 3-29-95 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 BATTERY REPAIR PUMP PARTS HOSES ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS ELECTRIC PARTS NOTICES & ADS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEMBERSHIP PUBLICATION BENCHMARKING STUDY CONSULTANT ON-SITE SEMINAR PUBLICATIONS OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-8-94 CONTROLLER UPGRADE TOOLS TOOLS/HARDWARE CERAMIC PROBE PLUMBING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES POWER CONDENSER HEAD WATER USE METAL TRUCK PARTS LAB SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, P2-55 CONSUL TING SERVICES SEMINAR REGISTRATION ELECTRIC CART PARTS INSTRUMENT REPAIRS CABLE SERVICES WINDOW TINTING LOCKS & KEYS FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL WARRANT NO. 160194 160195 160196 160197 160198 160199 160200 160201 160202 160203 160204 160205 160206 160207 160208 160209 160210 160211 160212 160213 160214 160215 160216 160217 160218 160219 160220 160221 160222 160223 160224 160225 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 VENDOR AMOUNT TORNELL & COTTON $3,297.50 EDWARD M. TORRES $250.00 TOSHIBA ACCESSORIES I $264.00 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $762.30 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. $727.31 TRANSCAT $4,617.14 TRI-STATE SEMINAR ON-THE-RIVER $40.00 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY, INC. $7,750.00 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $134.30 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $66.34 TRUESDAIL LABS $312.00 JG TUCKER & SON, INC. $3,331.46 TULE RANCH I MAGAN FARMS $34,723.80 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $344.38 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,827.16 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $31.31 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $387.09 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,618.00 WACKENHUT CORP. $8,968.15 WASTE MARKETS $40,331.84 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY $1,859.30 WEFTEC'97 $1,470.00 WESTERN FEDERAL INC $500.00 WESTERN MEDICAL CENTER $1,253.02 WESTERN PACIFIC ALLIANCE CO. $183.00 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $437.71 JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. $170.41 JUDITH A. WILSON $406.40 WOMEN'S ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL $500.00 XEROX CORP. $1,871.94 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $865.36 ZYMARK CORP. $436.00 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 $6,589, 165.60 PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 DESCRIPTION LEGAL SERVICES TRAVEL ADVANCE LAPTOP COMPUTER BATTERY INSTRUMENT PARTS TRUCK PARTS CALIBRATOR SEMINAR REGISTRATION CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 TRUCK PARTS TRUCK PARTS LAB SERVICES INSTRUMENT PARTS RESIDUALS REMOVAL PARCEL SERVICES LAB SUPPLIES PLUMBING SUPPLIES FIBER OPTICS COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3-27-96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCE REGISTRATION DEGREASER ROCONCILIATION REFUND EQUIPMENT REPAIR ELECTRIC SUPPLIES PUBLICATION EXPENSE REIMB. BEACH CLEAN-UP SPONSERSHIP COPIER LEASES LAB SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97 SUMMARY #1 OPERFUND #20PERFUND #2 CAP FAC FUND #30PERFUND #3 CAP FAC FUND #50PERFUND #5 CAP FAC FUND #60PERFUND #70PERFUND #7 CAP FAC FUND #11 OPER FUND #11 CAP FAC FUND #3&11 OPER FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #5&6 CAP FAC FUND #6&7 OPER FUND #7&14 OPER FUND JTOPERFUND CORF SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT $357.40 $11, 194.40 $4,206.00 $9,281.81 $6,705.70 $2,542.81 $2,248.00 $148.20 $2,592.51 $11,851.54 $1,416.65 $112,289.22 $25,790.00 $5,344.90 $43.02 $1,901.67 $4,381.99 $2,377,316.20 $3,603,262.09 $7,203.44 $399,088.05 $6,589, 165.60 PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 MEETING DATE OMTS: PDC: FAHR: EXEC: STEER: JT.BDS: 8127 /97 7 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Originator) 3720, Chuck Winsor, 5052 Division No., Name, and Extension REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE (District No. 7) : The Engineering Department requests approval of an agreement that provides reimbursement by District No. 7 to the County of Orange, Public Facilities and Resources Department, for the cost of adjusting approximately 12 existing District No. 7 manholes within several County of Orange streets in unincorporated areas in District 7 in conjunction with the County's "Resurfacing Program 1996-97". Recommended Action(s): 1. Approve a reimbursement agreement with the County of Orange authorizing District No. 7 to deposit the sum of $2,340.00 with the County of Orange as the estimated cost for adjustment of approximately twelve District No. 7 manholes in several County of Orange streets. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on N/A . . CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR-YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Total Budget plus Transfers) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $100,000 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000 SOURCE: DISTRICT No. 7 CIP Line Items: Item 13, Miscellaneous Projects AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: N/A $100,000.00 NIA N/A $100,000.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AU/'\ll•IT • ----~IC'r"\ AIT A••-•• .. •- N/A N/A $2,340.00 $2,340.00 I WILL PROJECT R:EQUIR:E ADDITIONAL flER:SONNEL? l~O R:EQUIR:ES 80AR:D POLICY ACTION? l~O Revised 05/14/97 Page 1 of2 H:\WP. OT A \AGENDA \AITS-97\AUGUSnENG.02.DOC ~2-/-9-1- Signature Date Assistant General Manager (Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List): 1. ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List) 1. County Sanitation District No. 7 (CSD 7) owns many local and trunk sewers in the unincorporated portion of Orange County near the City of Tustin. Most of those sewers are in public streets which are controlled by the County of Orange. This year, the County of Orange Public Facilities & Resources Department is providing street improvements on some of these streets by performing asphalt overlays as part of the County's "Resurfacing Program 1996-97". The street overlay program will initially cover up some of the District No. 7 manholes which will make it necessary to "adjust" (or raise) the elevation of the existing manholes to match the final elevation of the newly paved streets. The County is proposing to charge CSD 7 $195.00 for each manhole that is adjusted under this contract. It is customary for the District's to pay these cost when the Districts' facilities are located in the public right of way under an easement or by an encroachment permit. For twelve manholes, the total is $2,340.00. The funds for this project will be allocated from the miscellaneous project budget for District No. 7. Staff recommends approval of the reimbursement agreement with the County of Orange, which provides for District No. 7 to deposit the sum of $2,340.00 with the County of Orange. CFW:jmf . H:\WP .OTA \AGENDA \AITS-97\JUL Y\ENG.02 c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Revised 05/14197 H:\WP .OTA \AGENDA \AITS-97\JUL Y\ENG.02 Page 2 of2 DRAFT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962..-2411 MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1997 AT 5:30 P.M. The regular meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, July 30, 1997, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PRESENT: John J. Collins, Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair George Brown, Chair, FAHR Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Burnie Dunlap, Chair, PDC ABSENT: Bill Steiner, Supervisor APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel STAFF PRESENT: Donald F. Mcintyre, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Chief Operations Officer Judith A. Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer Edwin E. Hodges, Director of GSA Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary There were no comments by any member of the public. RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION: Receive, file and approve draft minutes of the June 25, 1997 Steering Committee meeting as mailed. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page2 July 30, 1997 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager thanked Judy Wilson for her two years of service to the Districts. At this time, her position will not be filled. The Administrative side of the house is in good order and with Don's oversight can be maintained. He will meet with the administrative departments heads on a weekly basis, as Judy has done. Action Item: A revised organization chart will be prepared for the next meeting. Director McGuigan suggested that Michelle Tuchman prepare an announcement on the plans to eliminate this position. Don indicated that he will be making the announcement at the August Board meeting. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a ~eport. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-10) The discussion items were taken out of order to accommodate staff schedules, as follows: 1. Consider County of Orange Request for Certification and Indemnification of Districts' User Charges and compliance with the provisions of Proposition 218 and make recommendation to Joint Boards. Discussion: General Counsel Tom Woodruff indicated that there is no longer a need to present this item to the Joint Boards because the County Auditor has agreed to language revisions suggested by Counsel. As it turned Ol.lt, 60 of the 63 entities that received this certification request also refused to sign the form as written. Action: The Steering Committee authorized General Counsel to send the revised compliance letter dated July 31, 1997 to the County Auditor. The Joint Chair will ask that the item be removed from the Joint Boards agenda tonight. 3. Update on County of Orange 800 MHz Project proposed at Plant 2 Discussion: Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, updated the Committee on recent activities related to the County's Emergency Response system, specifically the 800 MHz Communication System which is the backbone of the program. In April, when the project was first discussed with the Steering Committee, staff was directed to talk with the Huntington Beach Directors to get their concurrence. At that time, the Directors indicated they were not interested in participating in the program. However, the Huntington Beach City Council, on advice from their emergency services staff, voted in June to go ahead and allow the County to site a facility on our property. However, after meeting with the homeowners in the area, the specific site at Plant 2 has been changed. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 July 30, 1997 When staff was advised of the change, they notified the County that the location is on an earthquake fault. The County determined that this would not be a problem and submitted a proposed lease agreement that included a term of 50 years at no cost. During discussions, Mr. Hodges suggested that if the lease was "no cost", then we would want to be provided access to the 800 MHz system for free, which would result in a potential savings for the Districts of about $1.2 million. The other key negotiating point would be to get the Districts designated as an "essential public service", which we are not considered at this time by the county communication system. Another requirement would be that at the end of the lease , the County would be responsible for removing the facilities at their expense. There is an indemnity clause included as well. Mr. Hodges then described the project in more detail and displayed an architectural rendering of the project. The tower will be 150 feet tall and the footprint (including the building) will be approximately 20' x 60'. The Steering Committee authorized staff to proceed with negotiations, and directed staff to discuss the project with the Directors from Costa Mesa and Newport Beach as well. The lease agreement will be in a form acceptable to General Counsel. Director McGuigan suggested that landscaping be considered around the facility. 5. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Station, Job No. P1-51, and proposal from Pickens Fuel Corp. Mr. Hodges reviewed the history of the project and the activities to date. In June, General Counsel advised staff that there could be a problem with owning and operating a commercial station. A meeting was held with Pickens Fuel Corp. to discuss the possibility of their taking over the construction and financing responsibility for this station. They indicated a willingness to consider this opportunity, and submitted a proposal. Mr. Hodges outlined the deal points of the proposal. A meeting was held with AQMD to discuss the proposed changes, and they agreed with the concept. Several issues still need to be resolved, including obtaining the air emission credits associated with the project, and no guarantee from us on minimum usage. General Counsel explained the Districts' limited powers for business ventures that are specified in the Special Districts Act. Director Dunlap questioned selling electricity. Because this is a byproduct of our processes, there are no restrictions. There are studies underway at this time to see how the deregulation of the electrical utilities may affect the Districts. The Steering Committee had no objections to the continued negotiations with Pickens Fuel Corp. and AQMD. 2. Proposed Changes to the Delegation of Authority. Blake Anderson updated the members on the status of the proposed revisions to the Delegation of Authority resolution. These changes are tentatively scheduled to go to the PDC and FAHR in October, depending on when the workshop for the PDC Committee members is held. If approved, the changes would be effective January 1, 1998. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page4 July 30, 1997 4. Update on Investigation and Associated Costs. Judy Wilson reported on the status of the appeal hearings. All of the Level 2 hearings have been held. There are still three hearings for Level 1 employees and these should be completed by the end of August. Only one decision was overturned, due to the lack of cor:roborating testimony. The costs to date were also reviewed. The committee questioned the impact of vacant positions in the Collections Facilities Division on the collections system programs. Staff indicated that at this time there have been no adverse effects. 6. OCR Project Governance Issues. Blake Anderson discussed the process used for approving action items from the Joint OCR Project Cooperative Committee. There are two actions moving forward at this time for presentation to the Boards in August. Because no additional projects are anticipated that would require PDC Committee or Boards action until 1999, further discussions on streamlining the approval process will be deferred until mid-1998. 7. Next Steps for Consolidation. Judy Wilson indicated that there will be an Executive Committee meeting on September 17 to review the LAFCO application. Cymantha Atkinson will be the lead for this project. When the consolidation bill becomes law in January, LAFCO will hold public hearings. Implementation is scheduled for July 1, 1998. Don Mcintyre mentioned that he had lunch with Dana Smith of LAFCO and she is comfortable with the schedule. Staff is looking at this as an opportunity to streamline many of the administrative processes. The issue of rate equalization was discussed. Many of the issues of concern can be discussed after consolidation is implemented. 8. Review FY 96-97 Year-end Numbers. Staff reviewed the year-end numbers with the Committee. Year-end spending resulted in an increase in the cost/mgd, from $511 to $530. Controls may have to be developed to encourage staff to avoid this end-of-the-year budget spend down. The impact on the budget of the CMS investigation was discussed. 10. Agenda Items Scheduled for Committee Review in August. The OMTS and FAHR Committees are not meeting in August. The items for the August PDC Committee were discussed. Chair Collins suggested that Dave Ludwin and Chairman Dunlap meet with Supervisor Spitzer's aide before the meeting to thoroughly review the items on the agenda. Director McGuigan indicated that she has taken the liberty to change the OMTS scheduled "dark" month from December to January. There will be a meeting of the OMTS on December3. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 July 30, 1997 Director Dunlap advised the Committee that the members of the PDC Committee unanimously approved the hiring of Frank Dryden. It was agreed that Item 9, Discussion on Performance Evaluations of Assistant General Managers and Department Heads, would be moved to Closed Session. OTHER.BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY Blake Anderson updated the members on recent OCIP activities relative to the County's intention to keep ali of the $30 million settlement with Merrill Lynch, and discussed possible options. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CLOSED SESSION The Joint Chair reported to the Directors the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Section 45956'.9, to discuss personnel evaluations. He reported that the item could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the Committee. No other item would be discussed or acted upon. Upon the unanimous vote of all members present to move the item, the Committee convened in closed session at 7:05 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 45957 .2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the action taken will be publicly reported at the time that the approved action becomes final. At 7:25 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 27, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:26 p.m . . dta\admin\GM\STEERING COMMITIEE\97\JUL\July Minutes.doc DRAFT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box8127•10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: {714) 962-2411 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday. August 7. 1997 at 630 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on August 7, 1997, at 6:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. Prior to the meeting, there was a tour of the Secondary Treatment Facilities Upgrades (P1-36-2) at Plant No. 1. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present: Burnie Dunlap, Chair Tom Carroll John Collins, Joint Chair Shirley Dettloff, Vice Chair Brian Donahue Eva Miner-Bradford Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Absent Patsy Marshall Christina Shea Todd Spitzer Bob Zemel APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Staff Present: Don Mcintyre, General Manager Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications John Linder, Construction Manager Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor Jim Harris, Principal Engineering Associate Others Present: Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers Tom Dawes, Consultant Steve Uthoff & Narver The minutes of the July 3, 1997 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page2 August 7, 1997 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR After being advised that all Committee members had spoken with Frank Dryden, the consultant who is putting together the program on Engineering Processes, the Chair asked the Assistant General Manager of Operations if there was a target date for the orientation and workshop. The Assistant General Manager advised that the two dates they were looking at were Thursday, September 18th for the orientation, and Saturday, September 20th for the workshop. Committee members agreed that two sessions would be beneficial. All Board members would be given the opportunity to attend both of these sessions. Some Committee members advised that those dates would not be good. It was decided a telephone poll would be taken of the Committee to pick a date when the majority of the people can attend. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager passed out copies of a letter from Mark Asturias of the City of Garden Grove. The letter comments on what a good job consultants and staff are doing with the Rate Advisory and Planning Advisory Committees. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION The Assistant General Manager of Administration was not present. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER -OPERATIONS The Assistant General Manager of Operations advised that Frank Dryden will issue a report and summary of issues by the middle of next week. Frank believes that with the constructive comments and the issues that have come forward, this will be a really powerful and positive opportunity to make some constructive changes in how the Committee conducts business. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering distributed copies of the process flow diagram. Director Donahue had asked for some informational material whil~ on the tour this evening. It was also suggested during the tour that in order to have a comparison of our plant to other treatment plants, a time be set to visit another plant such as L.A. County Sanitation Districts or Irvine Ranch Water District. The Director of Engineering reported on his presentation at the City Council of Huntington Beach on Monday, August 4. After the Board meeting on July 10, Councilman Harman had asked him to report on the Slater Avenue Pump Station. Dave Ludwin ~;we a brief overview of the project. Minutes of the Planning. Design and Construction Committee Page3 August7. 1997 REPORT OE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. MONTHLY REPORT ON CHANGE ORDERS Information Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Report dated August 7. 1997. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (1-2) 1. DISCUSSION RE: COLLECTION SYSTEM INFORMATION IN COMPUTERIZED MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CMMS) DATABASE. RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action recommended by staff. The Engineering Supervisor. Planning. presented a discussion regarding the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) data which required corrections by COM during development of the collection systems model as part of the Strategic Plan. It was explained that the CMMS data was entered jointly by Districts• staff and RJN. an outside firm. It was further stated that the original intent of the CMMS was a maintenance management tool used for scheduling work and locating manholes. It was not intended to provide exact elevations of manholes -a requirement to do an accurate predictive hydraulic model. The additional work required of COM was due to 11stretching" the CMMS data for this engineering application. This turned out to be a cost-effective method of getting the most out of an old database. 2. DISCUSSION RE: SEISMIC RETROFIT OF STRUCTURES AND NONSTRUCTURAL SYSTEMS. RECOMMENDED ACTION:. Information Only Item. No action recommended by staff. The Engineering Manager presented the history of the seismic retrofit program the Districts has been implementing since 1989. The discussion included the soils investigations. defining the relationship between the Districts' facilities and local earthquake faults zones. predicting most likely maximum magnitude earthquake events, developing criteria for the upgrade of existing structures and minimum standards for new construction. and designs for supporting existing piping systems and mechanical/electrical equipment. The presentation also included information related to construction budgets and anticipated schedules for completion of the facilities upgrade. The original budget of approximately $60 million included all upgrades to facilities and the work required to stabilize the soils under structures. The soil stabilization was found to be impractical during the initial study and was not considered a viable means to increase the resistance of structures to an earthquake and subsequent liquification of the soil underlying the Huntington Beach facilities. The final cost of this program is approximately $9 million with final completion anticipated in the fourth quarter of 1998. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page4 August 7, 1997 ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 3-6) 3. PDC97-38: CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS. J-34-1 AND P2-35-5 WITH ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. FOR OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND PHASE II SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing six items of added work. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 2 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for an addition of $50,415, increasing the total contract amount to $7, 168,938. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. 4. PDC97-39: CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 TO JOB NO. P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 9 providing four items of additional and deleted work. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 9 to Job No. P1-36-2 with Margate Construction, Inc. for a credit of $2,479, decreasing the total contract amount to $35,255,318. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve recommended action. 5. PDC97-40: ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORK (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of selection of Black and Veatch for preliminary engineering and environmental work in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve selection of Black and Veatch to provide Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Work for the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $449,500 as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 29, 1997. The Districts' share is $224, 750, or fifty percent of the total fee of $449,500 in accordance with the Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated February 26, 1997. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. 6. PDC97-41: ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of a Task Order with Adler Public Affairs for public information services in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve selection of Adler Public Affairs to provide public information services in support of the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $99, 796, as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 22, 1997. The Districts' share -; Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Pages August 7, 1997 is $49,598, or fifty percent of the total fee of $99, 796, in accordance with the Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated February 26, 1997. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS. OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday, September 4, 1997. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Submitted by: /.Gail Cain ;:;ann;ng, Design, and Construction Committee Secretary :gc H:\WP.DTA\ENG\PDC97\AUG\MIN.WPO 1· MEETING DATE OMTS: POC: 8/7/97 FAHR: EXEC: STEER: JT.BOS: 8/27/97 DISTRICT NO. All AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: AGENDA ITEM TRANS MITT AL CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Originator) Dept. 3790, Tod Haynes, 6304 Division No., Name, and Extension CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NO. J-34-1 AND P2-35-5 WITH ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. FOR OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND PHASE II SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing six items of added work. Recommended Action(s): 1. Approve Change Order No. 2 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for an addition of $50,415.00 increasing the total contract amount to $7, 168,938.00. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO Date Notice of Exemption Filed: EIR approved July 1989 Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on July 1989 and Notice of Determination filed on 219/95 CURRENT BUDGET/COST INFORMATION TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ 8,750,000.00 SOURCE: CORF Schedule/line Items: line B(B)d and C(2)a AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:NA Schedule/line ltem:NA TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET INFORMATION First Year in Budget: Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR BUDGET AMOUNT $1,075,000 ORIGINAL BUDGET TOTAL $8, 750,000.00 ORIGINAL BID, PO, CONTRACT AMOUNT $7, 122,693.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES If YES, state number: _ Permanent _ limited Term DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: 11/20/96 CURRENT YEAR- TO-DATE EXPENDITURES $785,204 PREVIOUS BUDGET CHANGES $0.00 CHANGE ORDERS, FUNDS PREY. APPROVED ($4, 170.00) YEAR-TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE $289,796 BUDGET CHANGE THISAIT $0.00 AMOUNT REQUESTED THIS AIT $50,415.00 REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO REVISED BUDGET TOTAL (Total Budget plus Transfers) $1,075,000 REVISED TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $8, 750,000.00 AMENDED PROJECT AMOUNT $7,168,938.00 If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Revised 05/14/97 H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\J-34-1\AIT.C02 Page 1 of 2 ..C/ Date 7-'B · 'l7 Date ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List): 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List) 1. Budget Information Table 2. Chane Order Status Report 3. Signed Change Order ) Job No. J-34-1, Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, consists of improving the reliability of the standby Ocean Outfall Pipeline by constructing a new Surge Tower in this line and adding valves to the existing system. Job No. P2-35-5, Phase II Site and Security Improvements consist of miscellaneous site and landscape improvements at Plant No. 2. The plans and specifications for J-34-1 were prepared by Carollo Engineers and the plans and specifications for P2-35-5 were prepared by Brown and Caldwell Engineers. The construction contract was awarded to Advance Constructors, Inc. in November 1996. This contract is approximately 29% complete. Change Order No. 2 is an addition in the amount of $50,415.00 to the contract for 6 items of added work. There is no time extension for this change order. The following is a summary of the contract: Original Contract Price Previously· Authorized Changes This Change(Add){Deduet} Change Order to Date Percent Increase Amended Contract Price $ 7, 122,693.00 $ (4, 170.00) $ 50,415.00 $ 46,245.00 0.65% $ 7, 168,938.00 The following summarizes the Change Order. For additional details on individual items, see the attached Change Order: ITEM NO, DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE 1 Repair Outfall No. 2 3,629.00 0 Changed Condition 2 Undisclosed Structures and Pipe 14,750.00 0 Changed Condition 3 Conduit Revisions 6,928.00 0 Design Change 4 Over Excavation at Effluent Trunk 16,081.00 0 Changed Condition 5 Industrial Water System Revisions 2,718.00 0 Omission 6 Modifications at Effluent Sampler Building 6,309.00 0 Design Change TOTAL -Change Order No. 2 $50,415.00 0 All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the design phase. Liquidated damages on this contract is $500.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions. c: Department Head AGM-Administration A GM-Operations General Manager Revised 05114/97 H:\WP .OTA \ENG\ENG\J-34-1 \AIT .C02 Page 2of2 PROJECT/TASK CONSULTANT STAFF CONTRACTOR TOTAL BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site And Security Improvements Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED TOTAL (ADOPTED BY AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURE TO CORF) DATE REQUEST FUNDS DATE $ 247,000.00 $ 227,000.00 $ 227,000.00 $ 97,000.00 $ 1,024, 172.00 $ 1,024, 172.00 $ 1,024, 172.00 $ 465,631.00 $ 7,478,828.00 $ 7, 118,523.00 $ 50,415.00 $ 7, 168,938.00 $ 1,499,316.00 $ 8,750,000.00 $ 8,369,695.00 $ 50,415.00 $ 8,420, 110.00 $ 2,061,947.00 H:\wp.dta\eng\eng\J-34-1 \C02budgetbl.xls ESTIMATED COMPLETE TO DATE(%) 42.73% 45.46% 20.91% 24.49% ITEM CONTRACT CO N0.1 CO NO. 2 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site And Security Improvements Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) 11/20/96 $ 7t122,693.00 $ 7,122,693.00 730 730 6/25/97 $ (4,170.00) $ 7, 118,523.00 (0.06) 0 730 Proposed $ 50,415.00 $ 7,168,938.00 0.65 0 730 H :\wp.dta\eng\ENG\J-34-1 \C02chngstat.xls COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 1of4 Contractor: Advanco Constructors. Inc. CO. No. Two(2) Job: Date: August 27. 1997 Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade. Job No. J-34-1 Phase II Site and Security Improvements. Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access. Job No. SP19950003 Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduet) $ 50.415.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. J-34-1 ITEM 1 -REPAIR OUTFALL NO. 2: This item is for cost associated with investigation and repair Ocean Outfall No. 2 after a leak was discovered during excavation operations. The work includes excavation, epoxy grout injection, and backfill. This work was accomplishe.d by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 3) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,629.00 O Calendar Days ITEM 2 -UNDISCLOSED STRUCTURES AND PIPE CONFLICTING WITH CONSTRUCTION This item is for revising shoring in Area 1 to allow removal of undisclosed structures and debris discovered during construction operations. The additional work includes revised pile and lagging, removal of existing structures, and removal of pipe conflicting with the work. The structures and debris were not disclosed in the contract documents. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ITEM 3 -CONDUIT REVISIONS $14,750.00 O Calendar Days This item is for revising the conduit specification to meet new conduit material standards adopted by the Districts on August 17, 1996. The new standards were adopted after the design for this project was completed. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Field Change Order No. 10). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,928.00 0 Calendar Days COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 2of4 ~ Contractor: Advanco Constructors. Inc. CO. No. TwoC2l Job: Date: August 27. 1997 Ocean Outfall Reliabilitv Upgrade. Job No. J-34-1. Phase II Site and Security Improvements. Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access. Job No. SP19950003 ITEM 4 -OVER EXCAVATION OF 120" EFFLUENT LINE This item is for providing equipment, labor, and materials to remove unsuitable material below the proposed 120" Primary/Secondary Effluent line. The unsuitable material was encountered between Station 1 + 00 and Station 2 + 67 and was not shown in the contract documents. The unsuitable material was replaced with crushed rock surrounded by geotextile fabric. This work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b )2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 8) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Job No. P2-35-5 ITEM 5-INDUSTRIAL WATER SYSTEM REVISIONS $16,081.00 O Calendar Days This item is for revising the specification for industrial water pipe and valve boxes to provide color complying with Orange County Health Department standards for industrial water piping used for irrigation purposes. The color coding requirement for the pipe was not included in the contract documents. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b )2(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference Field Change Order No. 5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ITEM 6 -MODIFICATIONS AT EFFLUENT SAMPLER BUILDING $ 2,718.00 O Calendar Days This item is for revising grading requirements, increasing the size of the gas meter pit, and providing an access road to the meter pit adjacent to the Effluent Sampler Building. The revised grading requirements improve drainage for the area. The access road was not shown on the contract drawings but is needed for maintenance access. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOT AL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 6,309.00 O Calendar Days $50,415.00 0 Calendar Days f Contractor: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Advanco Constructors. Inc. CO. No. TwoC2l Page 3 of 4 Job: Date: August 27. 1997 Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade. Job No. J-34-1. Phase II Site and Securitv Improvements. Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access. Job No. SP19950003 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: Original Contract Time: Original Completion Date: Time Extension this C.O.: Total Contract Time Extension: Revised Contract Time: Revised Final Completion Due Date: January 9, 1997 730 Calendar Days January 8, 1999 0 Calendar Days 0 Calendar Days Not Applicable Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price Prev. Authorized Changes This Change (Add)(Dedt1et) Amended Contract Price $ 7. 122.693.00 $ (4. 170.00) $ 50.415.00 $ 7. 168.938.00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Page 4of4 \ Contractor: Advanco Constructors. Inc. CO. No. TwoC2l Job: Date: August 27. 1997 Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade. Job No. J-34-1. Phase II Site and Security Improvements. Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access. Job No. SP19950003 Board Authorization Date: August 27, 1997 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _Re__Jvie~-w~ed~by~;j 21"'~~~· . ·~i;;J~--~~~---=i.uZ3!!.g{ f :f Date Accepted by: Sub~by: 0-· ~ Co~StrUCiion Manager 2-U--t'z Date Approved as to Form: !\ tMEETING DATE OMTS: PDC:S/7/97 FAHR: EXEC: STEER: JT.BDS: 8/27/97 DISTRICT NO. All AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Originator} 720, Jim Herberg, ext. 5086 Division No., Name, and Extension ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORK (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of selection of Black and Veatch for preliminary engineering and environmental work in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project. Recommended Action(sl: 1. Approve selection of Black and Veatch to provide Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Work for the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $449,500 as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 29, 1997. The Districts share is $224,750, or fifty percent of the of total fee of $449,500 in accordance with the Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated February 26, 1997. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on _and Notice of Determination filed on _ CURRENT BUDGET/COST INFORMATION TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $500,000 SOURCE: CORF Schedule/Line ltems:C. 9 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET INFORMATION First Year tn Budget: Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR BUDGET AMOUNT (FY 97-98) $500,000 ORIGINAL BUDGET TOTAL NIA ORIGINAL BID, PO, CONTRACT AMOUNT NA WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO If YES, state number: _ Permanent Limited Term Revised 05/14197 H:\WP. OTA \ENG\3730\HERBERG\AITOCR.2 DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: February 26, 1997 CURRENT YEAR· TO-DATE EXPENDITURES $0 PREVIOUS BUDGET CHANGES N/A CHANGE ORDERS, FUNDS PREV. APPROVED $0.00 YEAR-TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE $500,000 BUDGET CHANGE THISAlT $0.00 AMOUNT REQUESTED THIS AIT $224,750.00 REVISED BUDGET TOTAL (Total Budget plus Transfers) $500,000 REVISED TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $116,000,000.00 AMENDED PROJECT AMOUNT $0.00 REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Page 1 of 2 Originator Date /J3-f1 Date Sig a Assistant Genera! Manager (Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) ..,,.,,,.,: .. ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List): ··~~-"." J • • -$) ·i. ·Agenda Item Submittal from July 29, 19~. OCR Project Coordinating Committee Meeting. ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List) 1. Agenda Item Submittal from July 29, 1997 OCR Project Project Coordinating Meeting. See attached Agenda Item Submittal from July 29, 1997 OCR Project Coordinating Committee. c: Department Head A GM-Ad ministration A GM-Operations General Manager Revised 05/14197 H:\WP. OTA \ENG\3730\HERBERG\AITOCR .2 Page 2 of2 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: July 29, 1997 TO: Joint OCR Project Cooperative Committee FROM: William R. Mills Jr. Donald F. Mcintyre Staff Contact: Thomas M. Dawes Budgeted: Yes Program/Line Item No.: 901-4030-600. 701 O Cost Estimate: $450, 000. 00 - General Counsel Approval: Pending Engineers/Feasibility Report Approved: Pending CEQA Compliance: Pending SUBJECT: CONSUL TANT SELECTION FOR THE OCR PROJECT PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. SUMMARY: Staff of the Orange County Water District, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the United States Bureau of Reclamation have evaluated the proposals received from the five (5) pre-approved teams and recommend award of a professional services contract for engineering and environmental work. RECOMMENDATION: Receive the staff report dated July 21, 1997 on the selection process followed for the OCR Project preliminary engineering and environmental compliance work, and award a professional service contract for completion of said work to Black & Veatch in an amount not to exceed $449,500.00. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a lengthy and detailed process to select a team of engineering and environmental specialists to prepare a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and serve as an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) .. The work includes preparation of a Supplement to the Engineer's Report on the OCR Project, providing additional information necessary to support the environmental process, and information needed by the United States Bureau of Reclamation for project evaluation under federal guidelines. The engineering supplement will also provide additional data requested by this committee and by the CSDOC/OCWD staff team for project development. As detailed in the attached July 21 staff report, the selection process started with a solicitation of statement of qualifications (SQQ) from environmental and engineering teams, pre- qualification of teams based on the SOQ's; preparation of a Request for Proposal with a detailed scope of work, and final evaluation of the proposals, including presentations by the $ proposing teams, all evaluated by staff from CSDOC, OCWD and USBR (proposals only). While the evaluation team found all the consultants to be highly qualified for this work, it is recommended that the committee recommend award of a professional services contract to Black & Veatch in an amount not to exceed $449,500.00. If the committee makes a recommendation on award of a professional contract, the recommendation will proceed to the CSDOC's Planning Design and Construction Committee and then to the CSDOC and OCWD Board of Directors for final approval consideration in August. PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S): Committee approval of RFP process on May 13, 1997. Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project EIR/EIS and Supplemental Engineering Request for Proposal Evaluation and Selection Process Introduction and Summary A thirteen (13) member evaluation committee made up of staff from the Orange County Water District, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, and the United States Bureau of Reclamation has reviewed the proposals and evaluated the presentations of the five (5) pre-qualified teams proposing on the preliminary engineering and environmental work for the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation (OCR) Project. The five teams, a combination of environmental firms and engineering firms (plus specialty consultants in some cases), are all highly qualified to do the work outlined in the Scope of Services. The team selection process, described below and previously approved by this committee, was very thorough and detailed. This report describes the evaluation process that led to the staff recommendation. Based on the proposals and, to a lesser extent, the presentations, the staff selection team recommends that a professional services contract be awarded to Black & Veatch in an amount not to exceed $449,500. The Evaluation and Selection Process On November 20, 1996, the OCWD Board authorized solicitation of Statements of Qualifications from qualified consulting firms to prepare California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance documents and provide engineering necessary to support document preparation. The Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFQ) was advertised in the Orange County Register, by direct mailing, through two engineering marketing services and by word- of-mouth. Fifty-six copies of the RFQ were distributed. Seven teams responded to the RFQ by submitting a Statement of Qualifications. On May 13, 1997, the Joint OCR Project Cooperative Committee authorized staff to solicit proposals from the five top- rated teams. Proposals were received on July 3, 1997 9 from each of the five teams that were pre-qualified. An evaluation team with various areas of expertise was formed to review the proposals. The team consisted of OCWD/CSDOC staff members and a member of USBR as shown in Table 1. 1 Evaluator Susan Bradford Steve Conklin Tom Dawes Elizabeth Flammini Jim Herberg Roy Herndon John Kennedy Del Kidd Larry Kraemer Greg Leslie Dave Ludwin Tama Snow Doug Stewart Table 1 Evaluation Team Aeency Title OCWD Principal Regulatory Investigator OCWD Director of Engineering OCWD/CSDOC OCR Project Manager OCWD Senior Engineer -Advance Planning CSDOC Engineering Supervisor OCWD District Hydrogeologist OCWD Director of Advance Planning USBR Environmental Protection Specialist CSDOC Engineer OCWD Senior Engineer CS DOC Director of Engineering OCWD Senior Engineer -Advance Planning CS DOC Enjdneering Manager The evaluation team reviewe~ the written proposals from July 3, 1997 to July 16, 1997 and oral presentations of the five proposing teams were held on July 17, 1997. The proposals and interviews were evaluated based on the following criteria: • Related experience and qualifications of team and proposed key staff as determined by the Statement of Qualifications and proposals. • Understanding of the project scope, content, creativity and how scope will be accomplished. • Time commitment of key staff and ability to provide necessary staff by experienced practitioners. • Record of success on similar projects. • Knowledge and experience in working with environmental groups, regulatory agencies and local government officials. • Potential conflicts resulting from obligation to other clients, if any. • Ability and success of proposed key engineering and environmental staff working together as a team on past projects. • Ability to meet aggressive project schedule. • Ability to work with public relations firm. • Content of oral presentation; approach, logic, and creativity. • Communication skills; ability to respond to questions and communicate clearly and effectively. + Estimated fee for providing services outlined in the scope. • Other criteria determined by the selection committee. The selection criteria listed above were incorporated into the proposal and oral presentation evaluation sheets. The evaluation criteria followed the OCWD Board- 2 .. - ...... v approved Consultant Selection Procedure. Each member of the team completed written evaluatio:a sheets for both the proposals and oral presentations (the forms are included as Attachment 1). The weightings of the criteria were determined by the consensus of the evaluation team in advance of the proposals being reviewed. Each proposed team was allotted 45 minutes to make a presentation and answer questions from the evaluation team. The evaluation team asked each firm a list of pre- determined questions provided those questions had not been addressed in the firm's presentation. The predetermined questions are included as Attachment 2. The evaluation team also asked questions based on each team's presentation. Based on this evaluation process, the following ranking of the proposing firms was developed as shown in Table 2. Also included in Table 2 are the fee estimates that were submitted under separate cover by each of the firms. Table 2 Ranking of Firms to Prepare EIR/EIS and Supplemental Engineers Report Rankin2 Firms 1 Black & Veatch w/ P& D Consultants 2 Boyle w/ Jones & Stokes Associates 3 ESA w/ CH2M Hill 4 Parsons Engineering Science w I HY A 5 CDM w/ Planning Consultants Research Fee $449,500 $459,890 $448,953 $450,000 $429,175 Note that throughout the following report, individual team members are not named in relation to the scores or comments. In the interest of preserving the integrity of the RFP process and the team-based approach to the evaluation, the evaluators have been assigned numbers. The number assignments are consistent throughout the report. Numerical Evaluation For the proposal and oral presentation evaluations, Table 3 summarizes the total points that each of the proposing teams received from the evaluation committee. The scores given by each of the individual evaluation team members is provided in Attachment 3. 3 Table 3 Ranking of Proposals and Oral Presentations Proposal Oral Presentation Total Points Total Points Grand Total Received Received Points Received Proposine Firms (910 Possible) (390 Possible) (1,300 Possible) Black & Veatch w/ P& D Consultants 811.5 367.8 1,179.3 Boyle w/ Jones & Stokes Associates 769.4 360.5 1,129.9 ESA w/ CH2M Hill 725.6 355.0 1,080.6 Parsons Engineering Science w/ HY A 700.0 336.5 1,036.5 CDM w/ Planning Consultants 655.5 207.1 862.6 Research As shown in Table 3 above, the team led by Black & Veatch clearly received the highest rating for both their. proposal and oral presentation, followed closely by the teams led by Boyle, ESA, Parsons Engineering Science, and CDM, respectively. Narrative Comments Following is a brief description of each of the teams that proposed and the narrative comments that were received from various evaluation committee members. Black & Veatch/P&D Consultants/Montgomery Watson Black & Veatch will be the lead firm and will coordinate the activities between the various consultants. Black & Veatch will prepare the Supplement to the Engineer's Report and will be assisted by Montgomery Watson. P&D Consultants will prepare the EIR/EIS. Evaluator 1: This is an excellent team. They have experts in A WT facilities, sanitation facilities, river corridor issues and environmental work. The principal is an expert in water project development. The team understands this project, the environment and public health. This team could do an excellent job. Evaluator 2: Project Manager is very familiar with the District. Lead Engineer has worked on San Diego Project. They made good technical points in the RFP regarding TOC issues and how the EIR must explain the need for the project from a water supply perspective. They have prepared a model to assist with analysis of alternatives. They have some individuals on team that will be very helpful in obtaining permits and 4 Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 working with agencies. Appears team has not worked together on a large reclamation project. Evaluator 3: This team was strong in specifics. They understood the many aspects that go into preparing a good EIR/EIS, and seemed to know how to get there. They also wanted the engineering elements and compliance process integrated into a "seamless" unit. Uniting these two elements would help both facets of this proposed project. The team understands the importance of meeting the schedule, and are strongly committed to doing that. Again, from what is presented in their proposal, this team would do a credible job for the Districts. Evaluator 4: This team appeared to have a good understanding of the scope of work and a good approach to getting the job complete. The core people proposed for the project have related experience. This team emphasized and reemphasized how important the schedule was and that they would meet it. Concerned with the number of subconsultants proposed due to the amount of coordination that will be required. Number of hours proposed to do the job appears reasonable. Evaluator 5: Proposal shows an excellent understanding of issues related to the project. Team has designed or participated in design/build of seven demineralization plants. Strong team with experienced practitioners. This team appears to have the most experience with designing membrane treatment plants. The team includes Carl Nelson and Jim Crook who would be excellent assets with respect to acquiring the necessary permits from the County and ACOE ~d working with DHS. EvaluatGr 6: hnpressive team with B & V and Montgomery Watson together. The core team of Argo, Salenius and Richardson all have good related experience. Good presentation of project issues and approach. Evaluator 7: Best overall approach and statement of key EIR/EIS permitting hurdles. Primary emphasis on public health protection, perception issues and regulatory approval. Substantial staff experience on reclamation projects, EIR' s and engineering design. Evaluator 8: Team appears to have done research on pipeline alignments. Experience with OCWD and CSDOC. Jim Crook would be an asset to this project. Above average water treatment experience. Good related experience. Evaluator 9: Very strong proposal. Team understands that the EIR/EIS process is the public facet of the project. The team has identified the key technical issues, such as lack of vadose zone and treatment train design, that will require the most flexibility. The team has good qualifications on large pipeline projects (e.g. The Inland Feeder) and have identified several options to mitigate potential problems associated with alignment of the pipeline. This is a strong proposal. The only weakness is that the team is not as 5 experienced with the EIR/EIS process for reclamation projects as the ESA/CH2M Hill team or the ES/HY A team. Evaluator 10: The approach given is very specific regarding numerous issues and seems to indicate deep understanding of the project. The team has very strong experience. Overall, an excellent proposal. Evaluator 11: Project Manager's experience and expertise seems uniquely suited for this project. The wide range of experience available on this team makes this an exceptionally strong team. The staff shown in this proposal are those who will actually be performing the day to day work. Would like to have seen a stronger environmental team, but this team can do the job. Evaluator 12: Excellent local experience and regulatory experience. Strong EIR experience. Sylvia Salenius has extensive water and wastewater EIR experience. Proposal identified the TOC and vadose zone concerns and concerns with current pipeline alignment and provided potential solutions. Evaluator 13: A well put together team. Very strong in water reclamation technology, permitting and environmental issues. A very good technical presentation of the important issues. Boyle Engineering/Jones & Stokes~colm Pirnie Boyle will be the lead consultant for this team and will coordinate the overall management activities. Boyle will also be responsible for the preparation of the Supplemental Engineer's Report. The AWT evaluation will be done by both Malcolm Pirnie and Boyle. Jones & Stokes will be a subconsultant to Boyle and will be responsible for the preparation of the EIR/EIS. Evaluator 1: This is an excellent team. They understand the schedule and the project. Jones & Stokes is an excellent environmental firm, perhaps the best. Malcolm Pirnie brings A WT experience. Boyle knows local issues and how to manage a large project. This team could do an excellent job. Evaluator 2: The Project Manager is very easy to work with and understands the District. They have a good understanding of the project. Very good technical people which will help resolve some key project issues such as disinfection & CSDOC needs. The team has experience on the San Diego Project. Evaluator 3: This team had a good theoretical understanding of the compliance process. For example, they knew that a well crafted "Purpose and Need" could narrow down the number of reasonable alternatives. Alternatives are the heart of the NEPA process. There were other instances, but the "Purpose and Need" revealed they understand the importance of preparing a good EIR/EIS. Their engineering proposal 6 also seemed more than acceptable. They are aware that the schedule is aggressive, and are committed to meeting it. From what was presented in their proposal, this team would do a credible job for the Districts. Evaluator 4: Team has related experience. Currently working on the San Diego Project. People proposed have a wealth of experience. Jones & Stokes appears to be an excellent environmental firm and has prepared numerous EIR' s. Concerned that the proposed key people may not have the time to dedicate to this project. The number of hours proposed is high relative to other teams. Evaluator 5: Clear and logical approach to project objectives and EIR/EIS explanation. Good ideas with respect to facilities design. Key staff appear to be experienced and well qualified. Experience gained from San Diego Project will be directly applicable to OCR Project. Seem very well versed with respect to available treatment alternatives. Kris Lindstrom would be an asset to have on this project with respect to RWQCB and his work with CSDOC in preparing the waiver application. Evaluator 6: Fairly strong, but not outstanding, project staff. Fairly good· experience. Having MPI on the team adds significantly to the team's technical capabilities with membrane projects. Proposal shows the highest proposed man-hours at 5172. Average for the five proposals is 4662. Evaluator 7: Emphasized public concerns on water quality and health issues to address in EIR. Made distinction between EIR and EIS. Boyle and Pirnie are teamed on San Diego A WT. Strong in engineering but proposal did not indicate substantial experience doing EIR's for reclamation projects. No hydrogeology or groundwater modeling staff in proposal. Evaluator 8: Team appears to have a good understanding of the project. Excellent mixture of technical staff in all disciplines. Very well known experts in the field of A WT. Have worked with OCWD and CSDOC on many planning projects and have been successful. Evaluator 9: Without a doubt, "Start Design in 99" is a slick slogan for a proposal for the program EIR/EIS and supplement to the engineering report. The consultants have assembled a talented team. The experience with the San Diego Repurification project would indicate that this team could easily provide the engineering support for the EIR/EIS process. Also the team is sensitive to the issues raised by the public relations firm including public art, process reliability, and public access to the treatment train. The inclusion of Chris Lindstrom would suggest seamless coordination of the previous environmental work with both the CSDOC strategic plan and the OCR feasibility study. The detailed work effort suggests that the team recognizes the importance of a successful program EIR/EIS (4038 h out of 5172 h). The preponderance of time allocated for the engineering component is astutely allocated to site and corridor studies, visual displays, Engineer's Report Supplement and EIR/EIS support. 7 Furthermore, it is very encouraging that Bill Everest will be leading the engineering effort. It would be very easy for both OCWD and CSDOC staff to work with Bill Everest. The inclusion of Garret Westerhoff in the QA/QC meetings is also an asset to this proposal. One weakness is that the team does not have as much experience in EIR work on reclamation projects of this type or interaction with the Bureau of Reclamation as some of the other teams. Also, on face value the proposal did not contain as much detail on potential mitigation issues associated with alignment of the pipe as one of the other proposals. Similarly, the hydrogeology component was not as strong as one of the proposals. These weaknesses, however, only slightly detract from a very clear and concise proposal. Evaluator 10: Boyle's approach is very solid and conveys a very strong understanding of OCR issues. Bill Everest is an excellent choice for project manager due to his experience and the fact that he's easy to work with. Malcolm Pirnie adds good process experience. Jones & Stokes is also a strong environmental firm. Evaluator 11: Excellent understanding of scope and approach to environmental preparation. Proposed a very strong team and this team did their homework. Question Boyle's and Malcolm Pirnie's availability with the current San Diego work. Evaluator 12: Detailed project approach. Designed San Diego Project and designed Expansion to Water Factory 21. Good regulatory experience. Evaluator 13: Excellent experience with water reclamation at San Diego. Very good EIR firm in Jones & Stokes. Clear presentation of issues. Man-hours appeared high compared to others. Good pipeline and pump station experience. ESA/CH2M Hill The lead consultant proposed for this team is ESA. ESA would be responsible for coordinating the subconsultant's activities and would prepare the EIR/EIS. CH2M Hill would provide assistance to ESA and would be responsible for preparation of the Supplemental Engineering Report. Evaluator 1: ESA brings an exceptionally strong environmental presence to this project. CH2M Hill complements with AWT experience. ESA is doing the environmental work for CSDOC' s new Strategic Plan which could help with coordination. This team is weak in overall local permitting issues, but could do this job very well. Evaluator 2: The overall team is good and qualified with related experience. The Project Manager appears to be very good, but I am unaware if she has much experience working with the Districts or the local regulators. It appears that the team is already looking for extra work items. 8 Evaluator 3: This team makes a very strong commitment to having the project manager, Leslie Moulton, work full time on the project. She appears to have excellent credentials for managing the engineering and compliance process. This team also had a number of excellent ideas on how to improve the functioning of the overall project. This team would do a credible job for the Districts. Evalµator 4: This team has good related experience and is currently working with CSDOC on an impact analysis. Lead project manager does not appear to have as much experience as other team leaders. However, the proposed team is strong and as a whole appears to be more than capable of completing this project. John Gaston is very well known and would be an asset to have on this project. Evaluator S: Team suggested additional components that could be integrated into the OCR Project which demonstrates innovative and visionary thinking. Proposed project manager, Leslie Moulton, is well qualified for this work. Currently preparing BIR for CSDOC Strategic Plan. This work could be directly applied to the OCR Project. Not sure how familiar project manager is with local environmental groups and regulatory officials. Evaluator 6: Leslie Moulton., proposed overall project manager, has excellent relevant experience, including CEQA/NEPA documents for six water reuse projects in the last five years. BSA and CH2M Hill jointly prepared the Dublin San Ramon Groundwater Recharge Program BIR. Both firms have worked on several reclamation projects, including proposed senior staff. The proposal showed initiative and thought by describing optional tasks that could expand the project and its capabilities. Their project team appears to have the most related experience of all the teams. Evaluator 7: Approach appears to meet the requirements of the scope; however, there was insufficient emphasis placed on public awareness and public perception issues that must be addressed during the BIR. Team has comprehensive relevant experience in key areas including qualified hydrogeologists and groundwater modelers. Evaluator 8: Appears to have a good understanding of the project. Understands CSDOC's concern for reliability. Level of effort appears low. Proposed staff appears qualified. Does not appear to be enough staff proposed to get the project completed within the tight schedule. Knowledgeable and experienced in EIS/BIR process. Both firms appear to have relevant and related experience. Evaluator 9: Team has experience working together. Team recogni7.es the importance of continuity between OCR BIR and CSDOC Strategic Plan. Evaluator 10: Good team, particularly Leslie Moulton, John Gaston, and Bruce Mowry. These three individuals have excellent combined experience. Their experience on the Dublin San Ramon Project is relevant to OCR. Their approach was well organized, but not as detailed as some of the other firms. 9 Evaluator 11: Team had a very strong environmental approach but seemed short of staffing on the engineering side in the written proposal. Showed a good, seamless team approach. Tremendous experience with West and Central Basin Reclamation Projects. Evaluator 12: Presented innovative ideas in Appendix A. Project approach is logical. ESA currently working on CSDOC's Strategic Plan and EIR. Prepared EIR for Dublin San Ramon. Project Manager does not appear to have experience with local Southern California Agencies. Evaluator 13: ESA has good experience with reclamation type projects in California. Good understanding of EIR issues. CH2M Hill provides engineering support necessary for EIR. Currently preparing CSDOC Strategic Plan EIR which would provide continuity of EIR' s. Parsons Engineering Science/HY A If selected, this project team will be managed by Engineering Science. Engineering Science will be responsible for preparing the EIR/EIS and will assist with the A WT evaluation. HY A will provide support to Engineering Science in preparing the supplement to the engineer's report. Evaluator 1: This team has an excellent leader in Kasper. They have good AWT -experience and have prepared environmental documents on similar but much smaller projects. They don't have the local experience or CSDOC experience that some of the others have. They could do a very good job. Evaluator 2: This team has some very good individuals with recent experience on large reclamation projects. The Project Engineer is very good and credible in front of an audience. However, it appears that the team has limited, if any, experience working together. Evaluator 3: This team's proposal was generic in its presentation. Nothing really stood out in my mind even though the proposal was read twice. However, the team has been involved in many other similar projects. Evaluator 4: This team has been involved in numerous water reclamation projects throughout California. The Parsons Engineering Science team appears to be extremely strong and capable of preparation of the EIR/EIS. While HY A has been involved in many reclamation projects, they are not able to present experience applicable to this project such as knowledge of microfiltration, reverse osmosis, groundwater injection, groundwater modeling, etc. Not sure what HYA contributes to the overall team. Number of hours appear to be excessive relative to other teams. It does not appear that they have worked together on past projects of this nature. 10 Evaluator S: Excellent overall project approach including technical advisory panel that has led to successful environmental documents. Team has excellent record of success in preparing environmental documents for reclamation projects, none of which have been challenged. Proposed project manager Dennis Kasper is highly respected in the environmental field. -Harvey Collins would be an asset to have on this project with his experience as Chief of the Division of Drinking Water for Department of Health Services and Chairman of the SARWQH Study. Evaluator 6: Best presentation of key issues and how they should be addressed; very clear and concise. Project team is fairly strong, with Dennis Kasper as the project manager. Team has good experience in reclamation projects. Evaluator 7: Good emphasis on public concerns of "unknowns". Numerous EIR/EIS projects for water reclamation noted including the West Basin Water Reclamation Project. Team did not propose any qualified hydrogeology modeling staff to review OCWD's work in Forebay and at Talbert Barrier. Evaluator 8: Identified long range health effects, TOC, and Viral DNA. Good team to develop cost estimate. Appear strong in the environmental area but not so strong on the engineering side. Knowledge .and experience appears to be above average. Evaluator 9: Demonstrated good understanding of project. Team has best experience and success on the EIR/EIS process for indirect potable reuse projects. Team has success in working with the Bureau of Reclamation. Evaluator 10: Engineering Science lists a great deal of involvement in other reclamation projects. Strong team, but approach doesn't seem quite as strong. Overall, the proposed approach is not very specific to OCR Project. Evaluator 11: Proposal was very heavy on the engineering side and light on the environmental. Not all of the top names in proposal appeared in the workload distribution chart. It appeared that they would look to CSDOC Staff for support on the treatment plant evaluation. Team has good experience, however, does not appear that they have stretched any boundaries on the innovation envelope. Evaluator 12: Logical project approach. Prepared EIR for Terminal Island and West Basin Water Reclamation Project. Evaluator 13: Approach to project was presented well. Project manager bas limited AWT experience. Team has limited experience with OCWD and CSDOC. West Basin EIR is good experience. Man-hour estimate is high compared to other teams estimates. 11 CDM/Planning Consultants Research (PCR) CDM would be the lead consultant for this project and coordinate the teams activities. PCR would be responsible for preparation of the EIR/EIS and CDM would be responsible for preparation of the supplemental engineers report. Evaluator 1: This team offers a strong project leader who is managing the strategic plan for CSDOC. This is a great plus in that project coordination issues would be eased. This team recognizes the potential of a future water education and research center. This team could do a very good job. Evaluator 2: Project Manager is very easy to deal with and able to get work accomplished despite bureaucracies. The lead engineer & Em team members lack experience on large reclamation projects. Appears the team does not have much local experience also. Evaluator 3: This team's main concern is with the engineering aspects of the project, and it appears that they have a firm grasp in this area. The compliance seems to be, at best, an afterthought. If the engineering is the most important aspect of the proposal, then this team appears to be an excellent one. Evaluator 4: This team really emphasized the engineering aspect of this project and it appeared from the proposal that the EIR/EIS was secondary. The total number of hours proposed appeared reasonable. However, more hours were attributed to the engineering effort than the EIR/EIS effort. Evaluator 5: Currently working on CSDOC Strategic Plan therefore, the learning curve with respect to CSDOC 's interests would be minimal. Proposal lacked suggestions for innovation. Team has worked together on large projects including Playa Vista and LAX Master Plan. Proposed project manager John Price was the project manager for the Tustin Desalter. Proposal focused more on engineering and missed the primary objective which is environmental compliance. Evaluator 6: The executive summary indicates that the issue of regulatory and public approval and acceptance are significant potential roadblocks. However, the proposal does not describe how these will be addressed and mitigated. The two projects that these firms have worked on together are not water projects. Greg Vail, proposed project manager for EIR/EIS, has not done such for a water or water reclamation project. Does Kelly Bum-Lucht, the proposed project director, have the time to direct this project and the CSDOC masterplan? PCR lists little or no experience in water reclamation EIR' s. Evaluator 7: Detailed discussion of engineering aspects of supplemental engineering report but grossly understated importance of EIR/EIS process which is the key purpose 12 of this contract. Very few, if any, EIR/EIS projects done by PCR staff on water and wastewater reclamation. No indication of CDM and PCR working together on past projects. Proposal did not indicate that this team had any previous experience with public involvement. Evaluator 8: Level of effort appears low compared to others. Kelle Bum-Lucht is an asset to this team, excellent project coordinator. Appear to have a strong team but does not appear to be as strong as others. CDM currently working with CSDOC preparing strategic plan. Evaluator 9: A very competent proposal. The team is very familiar with the technical issues involved in the project. The consultants have demonstrated an excellent understanding of current and future trends in most aspects of the design and operation of large scale membrane and conveyance process. The proposal contained an excellent description of water quality and quantity. The consultants identified important geological and seismic concerns with the alignment of the pipeline in the SAR channel and proposed innovative solutions for realignment based on the "separate reach" concept. Finally, the consultants also recognized the potential of the OCR Project to be a premier municipal reclamation plant and proposed the development of an International Water Resource Campus. Sµch a campus would fully exploit the development and training possibilities of the OCR Project and the consultants are to be commended for recognizing this important aspect of the project. The detailed level of effort, however, was skewed in favor of the engineering component of the program EIR and the Supplement to the Engineer's Report (396 h+ 1626 h) rather than the environmental component (77 h + 1186 h). The consultants did not emphasize the importance of evaluating (or discounting) project alternatives. The proposal only briefly described an approach to mitigate unforeseen problems and the importance of responding promptly and decisively to public and institutional concerns. With the exception of the 30 mgd project in Madras, the team has not had as much experience as other teams with indirect potable reuse projects. There is no doubt that this team could design the full OCR Project, however, at this stage the project requires more emphasis on the importance of satisfying the NEPA and CEQA requirements in concert with the public relations program. Evaluator 10: Kelle Bum-Lucht is an excellent project manager and brings knowledge of CSDOC and linkage with OCR and the Strategic Plan. CDM has strong membrane design experience. I am surprised that PCR doesn't have much (any) experience with reclaimed water or potable reuse project EIR's. The proposal didn't seem to have much emphasis on the EIR. Evaluator 11: Excellent written approach to project. CDM provided an in-depth analysis of the project. Proposal seems very weighted to having Kelle Bum-Lucht as the project manager. Question whether that is appropriate with all her other commitments to CSDOC Strategic Plan. Did not appear to have as strong of a backfield as some of the other proposals. 13 Evaluator 12: Limited reclamation experience. CDM currently preparing CSDOC Strategic Plan. There may be a time conflict with OCR EIR and CSDOC Strategic Plan. Limited regulatory work. Evaluator 13: Good insights into scope of work requirements. Understands CSDOC's needs through work on the Strategic Plan. Good project director that's easy to work with. It does not appear that the EIR project manager has prepared an EIR for a water reclamation project. Too many hours allocated for the project director, more than the project manager. The man-hour estimate for the engineering is higher than the EIR effort. Conclusion Significant consideration must go into the evaluation and selection of an environmental and engineering team to prepare an EIR/EIS Document so that approval of the OCR Project can be received. All five of the proposing teams are well qualified for this project. Note that the firms submitted their fee proposals under separate cover and the evaluation team did not open the envelopes until after the proposal and oral presentation rankings were completed. Tl~e overall ranking of the firms and their proposed fees are as follows: Ranking Firms Fee 1 Black & Veatch w/ P& D Consultants $449,500 2 Boyle w/ Jones & Stokes Associates $459,890 3 ESA w/ CH2M Hill $448,953 4 Parson Engineering Science w/ HY A $450,000 5 CDM w/ Planning Consultants Research $429,175 The evaluation team consisting of OCWD, CSDOC and the United States Bureau of Reclamation staff recommend the team led by Black & Veatch based on the evaluation process outlined above. The staff evaluation team recommends award of a professional services agreement to Black & Veatch in the amount not to exceed $449,500. This report is respectfully submitted for your consideration. h:\documents\tss\narrative comments 14 b -; ··, .'·. ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM PROJECT: OCR Protect Environmental/Engineering Proposals DATE: ----- WEIGHT REVIEWER'S WEIGHTING EVALUATION x EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE (1-5) SCORE COMMENTS 1. Projed Approach and Schedule 4 (understanding of what is required, clear presentation of how the scope will be accomplished, innovative ideas for approaching the projed, and identification of possible areas of concern and potential solutions) 2. Experience and Qualifications of Key 3 Staff (including experience with working together previously as a team on large, multi-faceted water reclamation projects) 3. Time Commitment of Key Staff (ability 2 to provide necessary staffing by experienced practitioners) tr• . ~. 4 . Record of Experience and Success on 3 Similar Projects 5. Knowledge of and experience in 2 working with environmental groups, regulators, and local government officials. SUBTOTAL (total score possible= 70 14 oints 6. Presentation (see evaluation form for basis of score) TOTAL (total score possible = 100 points Scoring: 5 = Excellent 4 = Above Average 3 = Average 2 = Poor 1 = Unacceptable t.... .. PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM PROJECT: OCR Project Environmental/Engineering Proposal Presentations PROPOSING FIRM ______________ REVIEWER: ----- EVALUATION CRITERIA 1. Content I (approach, logic, etc.) 2. Content II (creativity) 3. Project Team Compatibility 4. Communication Skills (clear communicators, proficiency using audio visual equipment, able to think quickly on their feet, answered questions satisfactorily, etc.) TOTAL Scoring: 3 = 2 = 1 = 0 = Excellent Above Average Average Poor WEIGHT OF CRITERIA 3 2 2 3 10 REVIEWER'S EVALUATION SCORE (0-3) WEIGHTING x SCORE Total possible= 30 points DATE: July 17. 1997 COMMENTS Attachment 2 General questions for all consulting teams Interviews on July 17, 1997 1. Are the people presented in the proposal the actual staff that will be working on the project? 2. What is the staff's availability? How much time will key staff devote to this project? 3. Approximately how many other projects has the proposed team worked together on? Was it the same staff members? 4. Where are the key people located, what offices? 5. We were told yesterday by the SWRCB that, if we submit the BIR in September, the OCR Project could possibly qualify for an SRF loan commitment. How difficult would it be for you to acc~lerate your schedule and have the BIR complete in September? 6. In a public hearing, Disney in conjunction with the City of Anaheim have voiced strong concerns that the OCR Project water may contain mutagenic compounds. They are especially concerned about production of these compounds as a result of chlorination. How would you address these concerns? 7. How do you see your team interacting with the public relations team? Evaluator 1 2 3 4 5 6 -7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Totals Note: Attachment 3 Numerical Breakdown of Proposal and Oral Presentation Evaluations by Evaluator PROPOSING FIRMS Black & Veatch Boyle ESA Parsons ES Proposal Oral Pres. Total Proposal Oral Pres. Total Proposal Oral Pres. Total Proposal Oral Pres. 70.0 30.0 100.0 68.5 30.0 98.5 65.0 30.0 95.0 60.0 27.0 65.0 29.0 94.0 65.5 30.0 95.5 64.5 28.5 93.0 64.0 28.5 64.0 30.0 94.0 66.0 30.0 96.0 52.0 29.0 81.0 48.0 24.5 62.5 29.0 91.5 62.4 30.0 92.4 48.6 28.0 76.6 40.5 23.0 62.0 28.0 90.0 58.0 27.0 85.0 63.0 22.0 85.0 65.0 28.0 60.5 28.0 88.5 54.5 29.0 83.5 61.5 28.0 89.5 61.5 28.0 56.0 28.0 84.0 48.0 22.0 70.0 48.0 23.0 71.0 52.0 24.0 60.5 25.0 85.5 63.0 26.0 89.0 56.0 28.5 84.5 54.0 28.0 ----63.0 27.8 90.8 65.5 26.5 92.0 58.5 27.0 85.5 62.0 28.0 51.0 28.0 79.0 44.0 30.0 74.0 52.5 25.0 77.5 54.0 23.5 63.0 27.0 90.0 57.0 25.0 82.0 55.0 30.0 85.0 40.0 28.0 -70.0 28.0 98.0 63.0 28.0 91.0 48.0 26.0 74.0 64.0 24.0 -· 64.0 30.0 94.0 54.0 27.0 81.0 53.0 30.0 83.0 35.0 22.0 811.5 367.8 1179.3 769.4 360.5 1129.9 725.6 355.0 1080.6 700.0 336.5 (1) Possible points per evaluator: Proposal = 70; Oral Presentation = 30; (2) Total possible points per firm= (13 evaluators)x(100 Points)= 1300 points; H:\doc\tss\Evaluatlon Rating COM Total Proposal Oral Pres. Total 87.0 64.0 21.0 85.0 92.5 64.5 24.0 88.5 72.5 44.0 21.0 65.0 63.5 46.0 12.0 58.0 93.0 47.0 13.0 60.0 89.5 54.5 17.0 71.5 76.0 30.0 9.0 39.0 82.0 61.5 14.0 75.5 90.0 61.0 16.1 77.1 77.5 39.0 20.0 59.0 68.0 67.0 17.0 84.0 88.0 40.0 13.0 53.0 ---57.0 37.0 10.0 47.0 1036.5 655.5 207.1 862.6 7122197 3:40 PM ' .. ..._\·· \. tMEETING DATE OMTS: PDC:8f7/97 FAHR: EXEC: STEER: · JT.BDS: 8/27/97 DISTRICT NO. All AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Originator) 720, J. Herberg ext. 5086 Division No., Name, and Extension ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of a Task Order with Adler Public Affairs for public information services in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project. Recommended Action(sl: 1. Approve selection of Adler Public Affairs to provide public information services in support of the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $99,796, as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 22, 1997. The Districts' share is $49,598, or fifty percent of the of total fee of $99,796, in accordance with the Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated February 26, 1997. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on _and Notice of Determination filed on _ CURRENT BUDGET/COST INFORMATION TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $500,000 SOURCE: CORF Schedule/Line ltems:C. 9 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET INFORMATION First Year in Budget:: Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR BUDGET AMOUNT (FY 97-98) $500,000 ORIGINAL BUDGET TOTAL N/A ORIGINAL BID, PO, CONTRACT AMOUNT NA WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO If YES, state number: _ Permanent Limited Term Revised 05114/97 H:\WP .OTA \ENG\3730\HERBERG\OCRAIT1 .WPD DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: February 26, 1997 CURRENT YEAR- TO-DATE EXPENDITURES $0 PREVIOUS BUDGET CHANGES NIA CHANGE ORDERS, FUNDS PREV. APPROVED $0.00 YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL (Total Budget plus Transfers) $500,000 $500,000 BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL THISAIT PROJECT BUDGET $0.00 $116,000,000.00 AMOUNT AMENDED REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AIT AMOUNT $49,598.00 $49,598.00 REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Page 1 of2 . "' 1~~77 Date ~1 Signature Assistant General Manager (Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA Clistl: I · 1. Agenda Item Submittal and, Minutes from.~ July 22, 1997 OCR Project Coordinating Committee Meeting. ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List) 1. Agenda Item Submittal and minutes from July 22, 1997 OCR Project Coordinating Committee Meeting. I See attached Agenda Item Submittal and minutes from July 22, 1997 OCR Project Coordinating Committee. c: Department Head AGM-Administration A GM-Operations General Manager Revised 05/14197 H:\WP.DTA\ENG\3730\HERBERG\OCRAIT1 .WPD Page 2 of2 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: July 22, 1997 TO: Joint OCR Project Coordinating Committee FROM: Donald F. Mcintyre William R. Mills Jr. Budgeted: Yes Program/Line Item No. 901-4030-600. 70-01 Cost Estimate: $100 ,000 General Counsel Approval: N/ A Engineers/Feasibility Report Approved: N/ A CEQA Compliance: N/A Staff Contact: T. Dawes/M. Tuchman/K. Coates SUBJECT: OCR PROJECT PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM CONSULTANT INTERVIEWS SUMMARY As requested by the Committee, staff has called all Offerors to make appointments for interviews. RECOMMENDED ACTION Select consultant to perform the first phase of the public re·lations work for the OCR Project, development of the public relations program, and negotiate a fee. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS As requested, each appointment allows for a 20-minute presentation by the Offerer, a 15-minute question-and-answer session, and 10 minutes for the Committee to vacate the room to allow the next Offerer to set up. The schedule for consultant interviews, together with each firm's proposed fee, is as follows: -~[!pointment Time 5:45 p.m. 6:30 p.m. 7:15 p.m. 8:00 p.m. 8:45 p.m. 9:30 p.m. Offeror Waters & Faubel Adler Public Affairs. Katz & Associates with Ellis/Hart Associates, Inc Gladstone International Morrison & Associates Urban Alternatives Proeosed Fee $95,000 $99,796 $113,445 $87, 114 $106,000 $65,878 Evaluation forms and a list of prepared questions are attached for use at the Committee's discretion. PRIOR RELEVANT ACTION(S) Committee approval of RFP submittal on April 22, 1997 and of overall selection process approach on June 10, 1997. OCR Project Public Information Program PREPARED INTERVIEW QUESTIONS 1. What is your availability to work on OCR? Do you have any time conflicts with other projects 7 2. What kind of experience do you have in preparing a public information campaign strategy for a project of this magnitude 7 3. What is your strategy to handle media issues? Who do you propose to handle media inquires? 4. What is your approach for dealing with media crises -any ideas on how to prevent crisis? 5. Who will write news releases? 6. Who will handle generating the creative Mideas" and write the copy? How will these be presented to the Board and staff? 7. Who will handle the actual execution/production and media placement of collateral materials & advertisements? 8. Do you plan to develop a project identity: Would it be the same identity for all audiences? 9. How do you propose to handle the negative •sewage" image w/public? 10.Who will handle the research? 11 • What is your connection/affiliation with Orange County government/politics 7 12.How would you handle the distance between the Districts' offices and your offices 7 13.What is your strategy for working with two agencies, one Joint Coordinating Committee and two Boards of Directors? 14.How does your previous experience prepare you to work on OCR? 15.Do you feel there are any constraints with the project budget or with your proposed fee? MINUTES OF JOINT ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION (OCR) PROJECT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE l\IBETING: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT July 22, 1997, 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint CSDOC/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the proposed Orange County Regional Water Reclamation (OCR) Project was held in the Boardroom at the OCWD offices on July 22, 1997, at 5:30 p.m .. All members of the Committee were present: CSDOC Directors George Brown, Norman Eckenrode, and Peer Swan; OCWD Directors Philip L. Anthony, Langdon W. Owen, and Irv Pickler, Chairman of the Joint Committee. Staff in attendance were CSDOC Assistant General Manager Judith A Wilson; and OCWD General Manager William R Mills Jr., Public Affairs Specialist Katie Coates, and District Secretary Barbara White. Also present was CSDOC Chairman John Collins. 1. Minutes of July 8, 1997 OCR Committee meeting Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Minutes of the Joint CSDOC/OCWD OCR Cooperative Committee meeting held July 8, 1997 were approved. 2. Consultant Selection for the OCR Project Public Information Program Tonight's meeting was held for the purpose of interviewing the six candidates for the OCR Public Information Program. Mr. Mills distributed a letter from one of the six proposers, Urban Alternatives, declining the invitation to participate in tonight's interviews while stating that the firm was not withdrawing from consideration to conduct Phase I of the OCR Public Relations Program. Thirty-five minute interviews, consisting of a 20-minute presentation by the Offeror and a 15-minute question and answer session, were then conducted with the other five proposers: 5 :45 p.m. Waters & Faubel, represented by Meg Waters and Roger Faubel 6:30 p.m. Adler Public Affairs, represented by Gary Lawrence, Cheryl Downey, Jeffiey Adler and Jacki Bacharach 7:15 p.m. Katz & Associates with Ellis/Hart Associates, Inc., represented by Sara Katz, Laura Wangenheim, Patricia Tennyson, and Peter MacLaggan for Katz; and by Scott Hart for Ellis/Hart 8:00 p.m .. Gladstone International, represented by Joan Gladstone and fill Kanzler 8:45 p.m. Morrison & Associates, represented by Joanne Rodriguez, Carl Morrison, and Lisa Ohlund At the conclusion of the interview program the Directors compared their interview notes, concurring to short-list to Adler Public Affairs, Katz & Associates, and Morrison & Associates. These candidates were then ranked by each Director, at which time it was determined that Adler Public Affairs received the highest overall ranking. It was moved by Director Brown, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried unanimously to recommend the firm of Adler Public Affairs to conduct the OCR Public Information Program. ADJOURNMENT The Committee adjourned at 9:50 p.m. The next Joint OCR Committee meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, July 29, 1997, at 5:30 p.m at the CSDOC Administrative Offices, 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley. 2 ~ ~ .• DRAFT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1997 AT 5 P.M. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Tuesday, March 25, 1997, at 5 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PRESENT: George Brown, Comm. Chair and Chair, FAHR John Collins, Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair Shirley Dettloff, Chair, Dist. 11 Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Sheldon Singer, Chair, PDC ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Kellene Bum-Lucht, COM Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers STAFF PRESENT: Don Mcintyre, General Manager Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Gary Streed, Director of Finance Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Tom Dawes, Planning Manager Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer Angie Berdanis, Engineering Aide Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page2 March 25, 1997 RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the December 5, 1996 Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair did not make a report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager did not make a report. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-3) 1. STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE: David Ludwin introduced Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer, who will be working on planning issues after Tom Dawes' retirement. Phase I: Project 1: Tom updated the Committee on the status of Phase 1 's Project 1, Investigation and Repair of the Ocean Outfall. As previously reported, the investigation is on track, however, problems have been encountered with the repair portion because of difficulty obtaining diving services. The low bidder the second time around, has had problems getting the required insurance. The second low bidder indicated that they had the same insurance company and would have the same problem. The third bidder's fee was very high. General Counsel is working to resolve the problem. If it can't be resolved, re-bidding may be required. Projects 2 and 3: The consultant and staff updated the Ad Hoc Committee members on the status of Projects 2 and 3. The activities of the PAC and RAC were reviewed. She also discussed preliminary results from interviews and surveys. The proposed category structure and rate changes have been introduced. Director Swan suggested having four categories for residential connections. The staff expressed concern about their ability to complete the review of the base data in time for the next scheduled RAC meeting on April 3. The Directors agreed to delay that meeting by at least two weeks, to a date to be determined. Phase II: Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Facilities Dave Ludwin reported that COM is the consultant for this Phase. A kick-off meeting is scheduled for April 9. . .., v Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page 3 March 25, 1997 Director Swan expressed concern that using the 78-inch outfall has been eliminated as an alternative. Staff said that it was still on the list, that nothing had been eliminated yet. The Regional Board will be contacted to discuss the use of this outfall in more detail. Phase Ill: Preparation of Programmatic Environmental Impact Report: Proposals have been evaluated and staffs recommendation to enter an agreement with ESA is going to the PDC in April with work scheduled to start in May. Water Conservation: Meetings are continuing and a plan is in development, which will be presented in April. Some of the pitfalls of other conservation programs were discussed. Director Swan indicated that I RWD experience has shown that there is a better return by replacing shower heads than low flow toilets. The biggest savings of all can be realized by changing the way cities and water districts charge for water, using block rate allocations. Water Reclamation: There is a meeting of the joint agencies immediately following this meeting. There are still several major issues that need to be addressed, including how to proceed, defining the scope of work for a public relations firm for Phase 1 only, and how the project will be governed. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting has not been scheduled. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:28 p.m. Submitted by: \. H:\WP.DTA\AOMIN\GM\ADHOC-97\STRATPLN\MAR\MINUTES.MST ~1 l DRAFT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN June 18, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, June 18, 1997, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PRESENT: George Brown, Comm. Chair and Chair, FAHR John Collins, Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair Shirley Dettloff, Chair, Dist. 11 Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap, Chair, PDC Blake Anderson, COO OTHERS PRESENT: Kellene Bum-Lucht, COM Tom Dawes, OCR Planning Manager STAFF PRESENT: Don Mcintyre, General Manager Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Jim Herberg, Planning Supervisor Angie Berdanis, Engineering Associate Corina Chaudhry, Committee Secretary pro tern APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM, IF NECESSARY No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the March 25, 1997 Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page2 June 18, 1997 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR There was no report by the Committee Chair. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Don reported on a meeting at the City of Huntington Beach at which they had asked the Districts for assistance in the replacement of their sewer lines. Don said that we could not assist them on this project. The long-term costs would be about $140 million, and the short-term costs would be about $7 million. Don mentioned that these type of requests may happen more in the future as older cities face up to these type of liabilities and as EPA puts more pressure for all cities to be accountable for maintenance of their sewer systems. Discussion followed on the need for a Districts-wide cooperative effort to move toward a more uniform or standardized system for maintenance repair. John Collins said that if we received a letter from the City of Huntington Beach, that he wanted to see it. Don mentioned that Blake would not be attending the meeting tonight. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-4) 1. Strategic Plan Status and Schedule (Dave Ludwin) • Dave Ludwin discussed some of the details regarding the peak flow and hydraulic management issues. Dave mentioned that the meeting tonight was not a presentation, but rather an open discussion. Handouts were provided and Dave discussed the handout information. Dave mentioned that relative to the treatment -Phase 2 of the work, COM would also be doing that portion of the work. He said that began back in April of this year. Dave mentioned the kick-off meeting that took place between staff and the consultants. Dave said that COM was in the process of gathering data and information and interviewing staff. Dave reported that we would be looking at a variety of issues. He said that we were going to take a look at power generation and the demands of the plants, and would be discussing the Cen Gen facilities and how we propose to utilize them in consideration of the upcoming deregulations. Dave mentioned that COM would be looking at how the Districts generate power and its future uses. Biosolids and alternative disposal options were discussed. Dave said that COM would be working with Mike Moore and T.S. staff on these issues and strategies for the future. Dave reported that the CEQA consultant from Environmental Sciences Associates (ESA), was now involved in the project, and was attending the coordination meetings with COM staff. Dave reported that this was important in order to ensure that there wouldn't be any fatal flaws relative to ocean discharge requirements. Dave said that Kelli Bum-Lucht would be discussing this in more detail later on in her presentation. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page3 June 18, 1997 Dave mentioned the 25 different alternatives that were brought up at the March meeting. Dave reported that Kelli and her staff were working to get those alternatives down to a reasonable number. Dave reported on the collection system deficiencies and the fact that the Districts had obtained a lot of information from the databases and that we had also built a hydraulic model of our collection system. Dave said that we had identified some of the deficiencies in the existing system and had taken this forward to the year 2020. Dave said that the wet weather flow information that we gathered last winter was limited because we didn't have many large storms. He said that we would continue to do more monitoring next winter to help us gather more data. General Discussion by all Attendees Kelli reported that we are 90% complete on the interim flow management plan, which gives us a plan for immediate implementation for this next rain event. Kelli said that this plan delineates step by step what the operator should do to minimize or eliminate any flows that may go to the 78 inch outfall or the Santa Ana River. Peer Swan asked about the 78 inch outfall and about its use in emergencies since the pumps hadn't run for at least 20 years. Jim Herberg said that the system was periodically tested and that OOBS pumps could be used for this purpose. The connection fee alternatives were discussed as well as methods for determining rates that might provide economic relief to industries and commercial entities. The agenda for the June 19 RAC #6 meeting was briefly discussed. It was mentioned that the RAC would be finalizing some of their recommendations for rate structure in October of this year and that there would be a quarterly Board workshop in November. It was expected to go to FAHR in the spring. Judy Wilson reported that we would be going to market maybe in June to issue debt to implement the plan later in the year assuming that it's adopted in December. Judy said that basically we would be going to the rating agencies for rating appraisal in the fall after we knew what our reserves policies were and that we would go back to FAHR after going through the user fee structure. Judy said that first we needed to know our rate structure. Peer suggested that we shouldn't go to the rating agencies this year if we were not going to issue until next year. The debt issuance and the practice of paying for things out of the capital account and their recovery by future bond issues was discussed. Dave mentioned that the PAC would finalize recommendations for treatment and peak flow management in January 1998. He said that the OCR Draft EIR/EIS would go to the public in March 1998, and the Strategic Plan Draft EIR would go to the public in May 1998. Tom Dawes said that the OCR project is moving at an accelerated pace and that two OCR Projects would go to the PDC in September. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page4 June 18, 1997 Dave mentioned that an additional Workshop for the RAC had been added because of the model work. 2. Ocean Outfall Investigation (Jim Herberg) Jim Herberg reported on the outfall investigation that is underway and discussed the three items. He said that the first two items were complete; structural strength testing and the hydraulic testing. He reported that the investigation and minor repairs was just now beginning and that this would be complete in September. Jim discussed the hydraulic testing which was completed in December of 1996. He said that the main purpose was to determine pipe friction losses and to identify possible hydraulic restrictions. Jim said that the conclusions from hydraulic testing were as follows: -Hydraulic friction of outfall pipe had gradually increased over time. -There were no apparent hydraulic restrictions identified, and -There was no increase in rated outfall capacity. Jim discussed the chart that was provided regarding the tide swings. Jim also discussed the future investigation and minor repairs scheduled for the summer 1997. The future investigation and minor repairs for the 78 inch outfall are: 1) Clean diffuser ports 2) Close end gate, and 3) Probe the sand levels. Jim mentioned that we might need a permit to clean out the pipes. For the 120 inch outfall, they are: 1) Replace end gate restraint, 2) Detailed inspection of manholes and end gate hinges, 3) Clean diffuser ports, and 4) Sediment profile and samples. Jim said that if we find any problems, Carollo would prepare a contract to replace the hinge pins. John Collins said he wasn't comfortable with having Carollo preparing up our contracts. 3. Peak Flow Management (Kelli Bum-Lucht) Kelli discussed the development of flow management alternatives. Kelli said that each alternative would contain three basic component building blocks. They are 1) Ways to reduce the base flow, 2) Ways to provide storage to dampen the flow, and 3) Ways to discharge the flow through reuse scenario or some modifications to the outfall system. Kelli said that water conservation measures can reduce baseline wastewater flows and can possibly reduce the dry weather base flows. Kelli discussed MWDOC 's toilet retrofit program and the fact that MWDOC had originally had an aggressive schedule for toilet retrofit; about 50, 000 toilets per year, and that it would take them to the year 2015 to retrofit all the toilets as planned. However, Kelli mentioned that the program had been scaled back and now they would only be retrofitting about 20,000 toilets per year. She said this would result in about a 13 mgd reduction by the year 2020. Kelli said that for CDM's study they would be assuming the more -conservative approach and that in CDM's studies they would be using the 13 mgd number. Kelli discussed the possible methods for reduction in inflow and the infiltration into the system. She said that one proposed method would involve using rubber stoppers in manhole cover vent holes and that this would have to be a cooperative effort by all cities. She said this would involve about 120,000 to 140,000 manholes and would result in a possible 10-20% reduction of rain-induced in flow. She said that for infiltration reduction, this would require a localized flow monitoring program. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Pages June 18, 1997 Kelli discussed the possibilities for storage of flows until after storm peaks, and she also discussed the discharge reuse options to handle peak flows from the Plants. The possibilities are; providing water reclamation, increasing capacity of existing 120 inch outfall through modifications, constructing a second 120 inch outfall, use of the existing 78 inch outfall, and the use of the Santa Ana River. Kelli discussed the spreadsheet data handout "Performance of Flow Management Altemativesn. Kelli elaborated on the various conditions, and discussed alternatives for exceeding our planned discharge method. Kelli reported that if we do nothing else today to improve our system, we will more than likely exceed the limit at least once every seven years. Kelli said that capital costs and our annual operations & maintenance costs had not yet been calculated. She said that these costs would be forthcoming. As an example, she said that with the OCR Project, not doing anything to the outfall, using the 78 inch outfall as a backup, and having 40 mgd of storage, the Districts would probably not · exceed the limit once every 19 -20 years. Kelli asked the AD Hoc Committee if she took this information to the RAC, whether they would be able to follow the technical information. The Ad Hoc Committee said that the material was easy to follow and that Kelli had presented it well. It was suggested that a column be added which included frequency per year, use of 78 inch outfall. 4. "The Big Picture" (Tom Dawes) Tom Dawes provided the Committee with an overall "optionsn picture. A process diagram was handed out and this was discussed in detail. Tom discussed regulatory requirements, level of treatment; discharge locations, amount of secondary treatment, disinfection alternatives, and the OCR Project. Tom discussed ways to manage increased salinity including brine bypass of the Reclamation Plant. Tom reported on the possible solutions to reducing wet weather peak flows including the OCR Project, the reduction of I/I in partnership with agencies served, water conservation, and local sewer management. Tom said that there were few resources and little incentives for cities to do anything on their own to reduce Ill. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page6 June 18, 1997 There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting is scheduled for August 13, 1997. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Submitted by: H:\wp.dta\admin\GMW>HOC-97\STRATPLN\JUNE\061897.MIN .· . --. DRAFT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN Wednesday, August 13, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, August 13, 1997, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PRESENT: George Brown, Comm. Chair and Chair, FAHR John Collins, Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair Jan Debay, Chair, Dist. 5 Shirley Dettloff, Chair pro tern, Dist. 11 Burnie Dunlap, Chair, PDC Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Kellene Bum-Lucht, COM Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Tom Dawes, Planning Consultant STAFF PRESENT: Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer Mike Moore, EMC Manager Angie Berdanis, Engineering Aide Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the June 18, 1997 Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page2 August13, 1997 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The committee chair did not make a report REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Don Mcintyre said that this meeting was critical because the data compiled to date needs to be defined to develop public presentations and to determine the best way to get the information to the Directors. Several policy decisions are required. Information will be presented that will help the Committee members provide direction to staff on how to proceed. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-4) 1. Review Outcome of RAC Workshop No. 7. "Develop Recommendations" Kelli Bum-Lucht, COM consultant, reviewed the results from the July 31 RAC meeting. The intent of the RAC was to have them review alternatives developed by the Strategic Plan consultants and then make recommendations on the structure of the fee schedules in an effort to make them equitable for the three user fee groups- residential, commercial and industrial. After seven meetings, the RAC members decided as follows: USER FEES Decision Keep Existing User Charge System Change Commercial Categories Should Multi-Family be Proportionate to Single Family Should Different Cost Allocations be Applied Constant O&M: Residential Only Replacement/Improvement: Residential Only Constant O&M and Replacement/Improvement: Residential Only Other Cost Allocation Vote Yes No 16 4 20 0 21 1 6 16 5 15 0 1 A summary report will be developed on what the RAC members thought and why they thought the way they did. There is an interim RAC workshop, 78, planned for September 11 , and the final Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page 3 August13, 1997 meeting of this group will be October 9 (8?). At the last meeting, there will be a recognition ceremony for all members. The connection fee, which is charged to new users of the system, was discussed. At the next RAC meeting (78), the decisions for the remaining questions on connection fee methods will be completed. The results of the decisions so far are: CONNECTION FEES Decision Change Existing Connection Fee Method Tiered Residential Connection Fees Provide Industrial Incentives Change Payment Method Apply Different Cost Allocations "Buy-in" Costs: Residential Only "Incremental" Expansion Costs for Industrial/Commercial Wet Weather Facilities Method Vote Yes No 20 2 20 2 16 5 lll1@11lllllllill!1llllllllllll!llllllllljl!lll1illiilliilllli!·I General Counsel Tom Woodruff said that Proposition 218 does have an impact on this process and takes away some of the options previously allowed. Action Item: At the request of Director Debay, staff will prepare examples of the effect of changes on the various categories for the next meeting. 2. Review Major Policy Issues for Board Consideration Blake Anderson outlined the major topics that require policy decisions by the Directors. These include determining the level of treatment based on permit requirements, OCR requirements and community expectations; peak flow management; water conservation efforts; water reclamation; treatment works siting; treatment works automation; biosolids reuse; rate structure; cooperative programs; public information and Board workshops. Several of the issues and concerns that related to these topics were reviewed, as well as the mechanism for informing the Directors. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page4 August13, 1997 The topics and the recommended review committee follow. Rate Structure FAHR Automation FAHR and OMTS Construction Program PDC Treatment Plan PDCand OMTS Permit Issues OMTS Cooperative Projects Steering and Ad Hoc Public lnvolvement/EIR Process Ad Hoc The Committee accepted staff's recommendation. 3. Review Logistics That will Support Boards' Decision-making Process Director of Engineering David Ludwin discussed the protocol for the decision process. The schedule for the various elements was reviewed, as well as considering the involvement of the RAC/PAC members in workshops. Staff asked for direction on holding Saturday workshops for the FAHR Committee and the other Board members. The Ad Hoc Committee members indicated that they will act as the screening group. RAC members may be invited to attend a workshop in October. In January a new group, the PAC2, will be formed to discuss the preferred level of treatment. This will help prepare staff and the Boards for the EIR process. The OCR EIR process time line must follow our approval process. 4. Local Agency Cooperative Projects Don Mcintyre announced that the Los Angeles City Council confirmed the appointment of Judy Wilson as their new Director of Sanitation and that this would be her last meeting with the committee. Judy thanked the members for their support over the past two years. She then gave some background on the County-wide sewer collection system and the responsibilities of the Districts. Most of the sewer lines in Orange County are constructed and maintained by the cities; the Districts have about 3% of all sewer lines. However, in order to handle I and I, there must be a cooperative program with the cities on how storm water and ground water I and I is handled. General Counsel prepared a memorandum dated August 13, 1997 (copy attached) that outlined funding limitations on such a program, as well as providing a recommendation. The Health and Safety Code limits the Districts use of user and connection fee proceeds ,, .. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Pages August 13, 1997 for the "purchase or construction of new local street sewers or laterals as distinguished from main trunk, interceptor and outfall sewers". However, there is no prohibition on the operation and maintenance of local sewers. Therefore, depending on the scope of a matching funds program with cities, special legislation may or may not be req·uired. The matching funds program would require that the Diredors determine the overall policy on how to upgrade the sewer system within the service area. One suggestion was to provide matching funds to the cities to insure that they maintain and operate their local systems with "best management" pradices as developed by the Districts, after a study on the condition of local sewers is completed by the cities. Tom Dawes said that there were other benefits besides reducing I and I. There would be reduced costs for operations and maintenance; and with peak flow redudion, less capital would be necessary. Director Swan agreed and asked Kelli Bum-Lucht if the I and I problem had been discussed with the cities. Kelli indicated that the cities, for the most part, don't have a handle on the local situation, and some weren't aware of the issue. Director Debay suggested we buy the equipment necessary to check the conditions of local sewers and loan it to the cities. Director Collins suggested sharing the costs through a sewer equipment rental program. Blake Anderson said that District 11 is ready to start a cooperative study to try to evaluate the I and I problem, and they would probably be open to our assistance. Action Item: Staff will prepare a draft position paper to help formulate this program. It will be discussed with the cities and the findings will be presented at future Ad Hoc and Executive Committee meetings. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY Director Debay mentioned that a special. public outreach plan be prepared to notify the public when they should reduce their discharges to the sewer, such as heavy rain storms. This would include not using clothes washing machines or dishwashers, reducing the flushing of toilets, keeping storm drain openings clear of debris, and not popping manhole covers to drain standing water. Action Item: Staff will begin work on this plan. Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re the Strategic Plan Page6 August 13, 1997 MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting is tentatively scheduled for the third or fourth week of October 1997; the exact date and time to be determined. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 7:20 p.m. Submitted by: J H:\wp.c:tta\admin\GM\AOHOC-97\STRATPLN\AUG\081397.min.doc For Bd. Sec. Use Only 0 COM'.1. INFO. ITEM 0 COM\t ACTION ITEM 0 JT. BDSfcoNSENT ' D JT. BOS. DISCUSSION (NON-CONSENl) 0 PVB!jCflEARJNG xh 'J/f? .rr. BOS. MEETING DATE ~ JT. BOS.AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE OMTS: PDC: FAHR EXEC: STEER: JT.BDS: 08/2.7 /97 EXEC. ___ _ STEER. ___ _ DISTRICT NO. ALL AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: AGENDA ITEM TRANS MITT AL CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Originator) 2210, Gary G. Streed, Ext. 2500 Division No., Name, and Extension RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1997 (All Districts) Recommended Action(s): 1. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1997. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on _ and Notice of Determination filed on • CURRENT BUDGET/COST INFORMATION TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET INFORMATION First Year in Budget: Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR BUDGET AMOUNT N/A ORIGINAL BUDGET TOTAL N/A ORIGINAL BID, PO, CONTRACT AMOUNT N/A WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL 7 NO If YES, state number: _ Permanent _ Limited Term Revised 05/14197 H:\WP.DTA\FIN\2210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR.97\SEPT\FAHR97-54 .. DOC DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: CURRENT YEAR- TO-OATE EXPENDITURES N/A PREVIOUS BUDGET CHANGES N/A CHANGE ORDERS, FUNDS PREV. APPROVED N/A YEAR-TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE N/A BUDGET CHANGE THIS AIT N/A AMOUNT REQUESTED THIS AIT N/A REVISED BUDGET TOTAL (Total Budget plus Transfers) N/A REVISED TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $0.00 AMENDED PROJECT AMOUNT $0.00 REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Page 1 of2 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List): 14--3\UC:: 'ir Date 1. Monthly Investment Reports. 2. Monthly Transaction Report. ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List) CONCURRENCES: 1. Monthly Investment Reports. 2. Monthly Transaction Report. Date Oi ( t/J ~7 r: Date ltment He d Or Designee) ~U-'~ Sign a Date Assistant General Manager (Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO}, has served as the Districts' professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust as the Districts' third-party custodian, since September 1995. The Districts' Investment Policy, adopted by the Joint Boards, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." All of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with. Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market"} values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. The Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. The table below details the book balances of the Districts' funds at month-end. State of Calif. LAIF Union Bank Checking Account Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement Bank of America Checking Account Bank of America Money Market Account Bank of America Overnight Repurchase Agreement PIMCO -Short-term Portfolio PIMCO -Long-term Portfolio District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees Petty Cash Deferred Compensation TOTAL $ 19,998,921 5.6 88,144 5.1 1,937,000 5.1 78,062 4.5 12,679 4.1 -0- 17, 075, 097 5.4 289,141,121 5.9 4,230 5.5 33, 112,905 6.2 4,400 11.062 796 (1.21) -27.25 $372 515355 Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of July 1997 is attached. Drawdowns from the Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio totaling $30 million were transacted in July to meet semi-annual debt service payment requirements, and other cash flow needs. The new yield analysis report is presented again this month as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for indMdual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the Districts' custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. GGS:lc Revised 05/14197 \\LEAD\DATA2\WP.DTA\FIN\2210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR.97\SEPT\FAHR97.54 Page2of2 MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 July 1997) Liquid Operating Monies . 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • ti~~~ • Historical Cost: • PIMCO • Mellon 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: Of Index: 15.1.3 1%INTERESTRATECHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1 % Change: 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return(%): 1 Month: 3 Months: 12 Months: Year-to-Date: Index Total Rate of Return(%): 1 Month: H: l.. \FINANCE\221 O\KOZAK\LIQ0797.RPT • f ,, $17,207,579 $17,208,143 $17,207,579 $17,210,011 0.17 0.25 .. $29,253 (0.17%) 0% 85% "AAA" 0% 0.47 1.38 5.52 3.22 0.43 MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 July 1997) Long Term Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • a~~~ • Historical Cost: • PIMCO • Mellon 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: Of Index: 15.1.3 1%INTERESTRATECHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1 % Change: 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A": 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:(%) 1 Month: 3 Months: 12 Months: Year-to-Date: Index Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: H:\... \FJNANCE\22 I O\KOZAK\L-T0797.RPT ~295,595, 772 295,333,338 $294,016,102 $293,911,655 2.03 2.30 $6,000,594 0% NA ''AAA'' 0% 1.56 3.19 8.73 4.77 1.47 OCSF075111 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO MELLON TRUST PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR 31-JUL-1997 BASE: USO HBllOO % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.82 0.82 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER -DISCOUNT 2,073,477.59 2,073,477.59 12.05% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 2,374,706.67 2,374,706.67 13.80% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES -LESS THN lYR 2,748,380.44 2,748,380.44 15.97% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK -LESS THN lYR 3,341,489.09 3,341,489.09 19.42% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK -LES 2,960,326.67 2,960,326.67 17 .20% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 175,662.00 175,662.00 1.02% 0.00 6,587.33 3.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 13,674,043.28 13,674,043.28 79.46% 0.00 6, 587. 33 0.05 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,402,921.88 3,401,054.00 19.76% -1,867.88 195,500.00 5.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3 '402 '921. 88 3,401,054.00 19.76% -1,867.88 195,500.00 5.75 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 133 ,046.00 133 ,046.00 0.77% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 133 '046. 00 133 ,046.00 0.77% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ================== ================== ======== ================= ================ ======= NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 17' 210' 011.16 17,208,143.28 100.00% -1,867.88 202,087.33 1.17 -----------·---------------------------------------- Page 1 OCSF075222 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO MELLON TRUST PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR 31-JUL-1997 BASE: USO HBllOO % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.15 0.15 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -44,997,430.52 -44,997,430.52 -15.24% 0.00 0.00 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT -DOME 9,995,220.00 10,009,329.40 3.39% 14,109.40 595,000.00 5.94 COMMERCIAL PAPER -DISCOUNT 9, 591,652. 33 9,591,652.33 3.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK -LESS THN lYR 1,785,796.00 1,785,796.00 0.60% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 56,364.00 56,364.00 0.02% 0.00 2,113.65 3.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS -23,568,398.04 -23,554,288.64 -7.98% 14,109.40 597,113.65 -2.54 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 145,449,419.24 146,964,130.00 49.76% 1,514,710.76 10,151,250.00 6.91 U.S. AGENCIES 126,777,718.50 127, 100, 671. 00 43.04% 322,952.50 8,250,390.00 6.49 BANKING & FINANCE 27,553,599.00 27,517,364.00 9.32% -36,235.00 1,848,315.00 6.72 INDUSTRIAL 11,507,100.00 11,113,245.00 3.76% -393,855.00 988,500.00 8.89 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 311,287,836.74 312,695,410.00 105 .88% 1,407,573.26 21,238,455.00 6.79 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 6,192,216.54 6,192,216.54 PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 2.10% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 6,192,216.54 6,192,216.54 2.10% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ================== ================== ======== ================= ================ ======= NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 293,911,655.24 295,333,337.90 100.00% 1,421,682.66 21,835,568.65 7.39 Page 1 _, •.,l YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 OCSF07511102 1997/07/31 RUN DATE 08/06/97 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TI"E 10.41.52 ================================c============================================================================================ PAR VALUE VTlt AT CURRENT QUALITY tlARKET TOTAL COST/ 1. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE tlARKET VALUE 1. TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 175,662.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-.ooo 3.750 100.000 175,662.00 1.28 999495906 PUBLIC II 175,662.00 1.03 700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN ffTG CORP DISC 5.398 .ooo P-1 99.478 696,345.42 5.09 313397KT7 HAT 08/22/1997 696,345.42 4.08 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN ffTG CORP DISC 5.478 .ooo P-1 98.946 2,374,706.67 17.36 313397LG4 HAT 09/04/1997 2,374,706.67 13.91 3,000,000.00 FED FARff CR BK CONS DISC MTS 5.483 .ooo P-1 98.678 2,960,326.67 21.64 313313"81 tlAT 09/23/1997 2,960,326.67 17.34 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 5.500 .ooo P-1 98.185 294,555.00 2.15 313385NY8 tlAT 11/7/1997 294,555.00 1.73 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 5.524 .ooo P-1 97.941 2,350,588.67 17.19 313385PJ9 tlAT 11/17/1997 2,350,588.67 13.77 800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.542 .ooo NR 99.070 792,558.00 5.79 36959HWH6 09/17/1997 792,558.00 4.64 2,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL ffTG ASSN DISC MTS 5.542 .ooo P-1 98.156 2,748,380.44 20.09 313589NE9 "AT 10/20/1997 2,748,380.44 16.10 500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 5.590 .ooo P-1 98.577 492,882.92 3.60 02S81RXF5 10/15/1997 492,882.92 2.89 800,000.00 FORD ffTR CR CO DISC 5.634 .ooo NR 98.505 788,036.67 5.76 34539TX83 10/08/1997 788,036.67 4.62 -----------------------------------------TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.364 .088 13,674,042.46 100.00 13.,674.,042.46 80.11 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,400.,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.340 5.748 AAA 100.031 3.,402.,921.88 100.00 912827V33 05.7501. 09/$0/1997 DD 10/02195 3.,401.,054.00 19.92 YLDANAL OCSF07511102 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING YIELD ANALYSIS 1997/07/31 PAGE RUN DATE RUN TIME 2 08/06/97 10.41.52 ============================================================================================================================= I PAR VALUE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION ---------------------------------------------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES TOTAL YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE 5.340 5.748 5.363 .336 TOTAL COST/ MARKET VALUE 3,,402,,921.88 3,,401,,054.00 17,,076,,964.34 17,,075,,096.46 ================= Y. TYPE Y. TOTAL 100.00 19.92 100.00 100.00 ========= _, YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 OCSF07522202 1997/07/31 RUN DATE 08/06197 ORANGE CTY-LONS TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.41.52 ================================c=~========================================================================================== PAR VALUE Yl1t AT CURRENT QUALITY "ARK ET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL -----------------------------·-----------------------------·--------·------------------------------ CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 56,364.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-.ooo 3.750 100.000 56,364.00 .26 999495906 PUBLIC II 56,364.00 .02 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 5.403 .ooo P-1 99.211 1,785,796.00 8.32 313385LH7 HAT 09/05/1997 1,785,796.00 .53 4,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 5.576 .ooo P-1 98.988 4,256,484.00 19.85 02581RWC3 09/12/1997 4,256,484.00 1.27 2,400,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 5.581 .ooo P-1 99.078 2,377,880.00 11.08 02680JVN8 08/2211997 2,377,880.00 .71 l,soo,000.00 DU PONT DE NEttOUR DISC 5.585 .ooo P-1 98.472 1,477,083.33 6.88 26354AXF6 10/15/1997 1,477,083.33 .44 900,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC 5.618 .ooo P-1 98.797 8891 177.50 4.14 72447GWJ9 09/18/1997 889,177.50 .27 600,000.00 FORD HTR CR CO DISC 5.634 .ooo NR 98.505 591,027.50 2.75 34539TX83 10/08/1997 591,027.50 .18 10,000,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 6.000 5.944 100.093 9,995,220.00 46.67 0663JOKU7 05.9507. 06/19/1998 DD 06/19/97 10,009,329.40 3.00 -----------------------------------------TOTAL CASH &.CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.574 .872 21,429,032.33 100.00 21,443,141.73 6.42 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4,000,000.00 FORD HTR CR HTN TRANCHE •TR 96 .ooo 6.309 Al 100.329 3,970,480.00 1.28 345402DZ1 FLTS/RT 11/09/1998 DD 11/08/93 4,013,160.00 1.20 1,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR HTN TR I 00177 .ooo 5.872 Al 99.796 6,999,748.00 2.26 3454021U3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DD 03/30/94 7,085,516.00 2.12 24,ooo,ooo.oo U S TREASURY NOTES 6.015 6.282 AAA 101.484 24,216,237.92 7.78 9128272T8 06.3757. 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 24,356,160.00 7.29 35,ooo,ooo.oo U S TREASURY NOTES 6.044 6.727 AAA 102.203 35,583,789.06 11.43 912827R20 06.8757. 08/,1/1999 DD 08/31/94 35,111,050.00 10.71 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OCSF07522202 1997/07/31 RUN DATE 08/06/97 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERH OPERATING RUN TIME 10.41.52 ============================================================================================================================= PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL ----------------------------~-------------------------------------------------------------------- 11,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.147 6.345 AAA 102.437 11,159,843.75 3.60 9128272"1 06.5007. 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 11,268,070.00 3.37 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HTG ASSN MTN 6.291 6.177 AAA 100.859 4,488,705.00 1.45 31364CXV5 6.2307. 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 4,538,655.00 1.36 39,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DDS 6.305 6.497 AAA 99.891 39,890,500.00 12.65 313391586 6.4907. 09/13/2000 DD 09/13/95 39,556,836.00 11.84 1,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN I TR 00491 6.305 7.619 A2 100.934 1,031,860.00 .32 81238XUJ8 7.6907. 02/27/1998 DD 02/28/95 1,009,340.00 .30 4,500,000.00 CATERPILLAR FINL MTNS TR00389 6.322 5.799 A2 99.665 4,466,745.00 1.43 14912LSE2 8.7807. 07/15/1998 DD 12/15/95 4,484,925.00 1.34 34,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.391 7.431 AAA 104.297 35,102,165.70 11.34 912827S29 07.7507. 11/30/1999 DD 11/30/94 35,460,980.00 10.61 18,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.479 7.422 AAA 104.422 19,065,117.19 6.17 912827$45 07.7507. 12/31/1999 DD 01/03/95 19,318,070.00 5.78 1,000,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR I 00335 6.514 6.242 A3 100.282 993,160.00 .32 17120QPY1 6.2607. 07/20/1998 DD 07/18/95 1,002,820.00 .30 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.516 6.267 AAA 101.719 4,975,781.25 1.62 912827)(49 06.3757. 03/31/2001 DD 04/10/96 5,085,950.00 1.52 3,100,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN TR00324 6.532 8.094 A3 103.477 3,911,640.00 1.22 37042RPH8 8.3757. 02103/1999 DD 0/03/95 3,828,649.00 1.15 5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HAOKE LN BK CONS DDS 6.550 6.546 AAA 100.060 5,000,000.00 1.59 3133HOFB2 6.5507. 05/24/1999 DD 05/23/97 5,003,000.00 1.50 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.553 6.627 AAA 101.859 S,019,140.62 1.62 912827Q47 06.7507. 06/30/1999 DD 06/30/94 5,092,950.00 1.52 a,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HTG ASSN MTN 6.577 6.493 AAA 102.031 8,012,576.oo 2.61 31364CBD9 6.6257. 04/18/2001 DD 04/18/96 8,162,480.00 2.44 2,900,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR I 00306 6.591 7.205 A3 100.906 2,952,896.00 .93 17120QNT4 7.2707. 04/13/1998 DD 04/13/95 2,926,274.00 .88 9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 6.593 8.660 A2 106.810 9,903,780.00 3.07 718154882 9.2507. 02115/2000 9,612,900.00 2.88 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 OCSF07S22202 1997/07/31 RUN DATE 08/06197 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIHE 10.41.S2 ================================z=c========================================================================================== PAR VALUE YTll AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL -------------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------- 20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLHC 6.619 6.920 AAA 101.1S6 20,237,SOO.OO 6.46 999ABJ818 7.0007. 08/15/2002 20,231,200.00 6.05 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HTG ASSN MTN 6.636 5.749 AM 98.109 9,593,750.00 3.13 31364BWF3 S.6401. 02/20/2001 DD 02/20/96 9,810,900.00 2.94 3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 6.660 8.171 A3 105.SS6 3,221,010.00 1.01 37042RKQ4 8.62.57. 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 3,166,680.00 .95 1s,ooo,ooo.oo FEDERAL HOME LN HTG CORP DEBS 6.713 6.090 MA 98.3S9 14,SS4,687.SO 4.71 3134AOWW8 S.9907. 03/06/2001 DD 03/06/96 14,7S3,8SO.OO 4.42 2s,ooo,ooo.oo FEDERAL HOME LN ttTG DEB 6.720 6.708 MA 100.175 2.5,000,000.00 8.00 3134AOKQ2 6.7207. 10/02/2000 DD 10/02/95 2.5,043,7SO.OO 7.50 10,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.756 7.304 AAA 106.109 10,327,343.75 3.39 912827ZX3 07.7.607. 02115/2001 DD 02/lS/91 10,610,900.00 3.18 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER CORP DEBS 8.28S 10.398 A3 100.023 1,603,320.00 .47 171196AN8 10.4007. 08/01/1999 DD 08/01/87 1,500,345.00 .45 -----------------------------------------TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES S.908 6.710 311,287,836.74 100.00 312,695,410.00 93.60 -----------------------------------------TOTAL 5.903 6.623 332,716,869.07 100.00 334,138,SSl.73 100.00 ================= ========= MELLON TRUST OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN ADMINISTRATOR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DIST TO PLAN ADMIN 18-JUL-1997 NA9123459 ----------- CW ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 DIST TO PLAN ADMIN 31-JUL-1997 NA9123459 ----------- CW ----------- U.S. DOLLAR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 WIRE TO UNION BANK OF CALI 18-JUL-1997 NA9123459 FOR ADMIN FEE ----------- CW ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 TO REVERSE 18-JUL-1997 NA9123459 ----------- CWC ----------- U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 01-JUL-1997 313589JN4 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS ----------- CW MAT 07/24/1997 ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 24-JUL-1997 912827Z39 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- CW 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 24-JUL-1997 912827Z39 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- CW 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 ----------- PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 08-JUL-1997 02581RWC3 09/12/1997 08-JUL-1997 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS -10,000,000.00 -10,000,000.00 0.00 -20,000,000.00 -20,000,000.00 0.00 -10,000,000.00 -10,000,000.00 0.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 -3.00 -3.00 0.00 -3.00 -3.00 0.00 -3.00 -3.00 0.00 -4,256,484.00 4,256,484.00 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS -10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -20,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -4,256,484.00 4,256,484.00 •) BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 98.988000 98.9~8000 ---------------------------------------------------------~-------------------- Page 1 OCSG000100 CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------B MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES -FIX ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 08-JUL-1997 02581RWC3 09/12/1997 08-JUL-1997 FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 08-JUL-1997 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 14-JUL-1997 02581RXF5 10/15/1997 14-JUL-1997 B CHEMICAL BK COMMERCIAL PAPER/I ----------- LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 14-JUL-1997 02581RXF5 10/15/1997 14-JUL-1997 FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 14-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 26354AXF6 10/15/1997 B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 26354AXF6 10/15/1997 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 313385LH7 MAT 09/05/1997 B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 313385LH7 MAT 09/05/1997 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY LIQUID OP~R-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 313385NY8 MAT 11/7/1997 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 07-JUL-1997 07-JUL-1997 07-JUL-1997 07-JUL-1997 07-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 09-JUL-1997 09-JUL-1997 Page 2 0.00 -4,256,484.00 -4,256,484.00 0.00 -492,882.92 492,882.92 0.00 -492,882.92 -492,882.92 0.00 -1,477,083.33 1,477,083.33 0.00 -1,477,083.33 -1,477,083.33 0.00 -1,785,796.00 1,785,796.00 0.00 -1,785,796.00 -1,785,796.00 0.00 -294,555.00 294,555.00 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 -4,256,484.00 98.988000 0.00 98.988000 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 -492,882.92 98.576584 492,882.92 98.576584 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 -492,882.92 98.576584 0.00 98.576584 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 -1,477,083.33 98.472222 1,477 ,083. 33 98.472222 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 -1,477,083.33 98.472222 0.00 98.472222 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 -1,785,796.00 99.210889 1,785,796.00 99. 210889 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 -1,785,796.00 99.210889 0.00 99.210889 0.00 . 1.000000000 0.00 -294,555.00 98.185000 294,555.00 98.185000 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 ·--·~~--~- MELLON TRUST OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS 313385NY8 MAT 11/7/1997 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS 313385PJ9 MAT 11/17/1997 B MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS 313385PJ9 MAT 11/17/1997 FC MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES LIQUID OPER-PIMCO DISC DISC INC DISC INC EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE 09-JUL-1997 09-JUL-1997 09-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 ----------- 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 18-JUL-1997 313397KT7 MAT 08/22/1997 18-JUL-1997 B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 18-JUL-1997 313397KT7 MAT 08/22/1997 18-JUL-1997 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 18-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 23-JUL-1997 34539TUX1 07/31/1997 23-JUL-1997 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 23-JUL-1997 34539TUX1 07/31/1997 23-JUL-1997 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 23-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-JUL-1997 34539TX83 10/08/1997 03-JUL-1997 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-J·UL-1997 34539TX83 10/08/1997 03-JUL-1997 -----------· ·----- Page 3 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS -294,555.00 -294,555.00 0.00 -2,350,588.67 2,350,588.67 0.00 -2,350,588.67 -2,350,588.67 0.00 -696,345.42 696,345.42 0.00 -696,345.42 -696,345.42 0.00 -99,878.89 99,878.89 0.00 -99,878.89 -99,878.89 0.00 -591,027.50 591,027.50 o.oo' -591,027.50 -591,027.50 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS -294,555.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,350,588.67 2,350,588.67 0.00 0.00 -2,350,588.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 -696,345.42 696,345.42 0.00 0.00 -696,345.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 -99,878.89 99,878.89 0.00 0.00 -99,878.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 -591,027.50 591,027.50 0.00 0.00 -591,027.50 0.00 -~~------~ -----~--· '"#) ... BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ 98.185000 98.185000 1.000000000 97.941195 97.941195 1.000000000 97.941195 97.941195 1.000000000 99.477917 99.477917 1.000000000 99.477917 99.477917 1.000000000 99.878890 99.878890 1.000000000 99.878890 99.878890 1.000000000 98.504583 98.504583 1.000000000 98.504583 98.504583 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE --------------------------------------------------------------FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 03-JUL-1997 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-JUL-1997 34S39TX83 10/08/1997 03-JUL-1997 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 34S39TX83 10/08/1997 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 18-JUL-1997 369S9HWH6 09/17/1997 18-JUL-1997 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 369S9HWH6 09/17/1997 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC 72447GWJ9 09/18/1997 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 900,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC 72447GWJ9 09/18/1997 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 01-JUL-1997 02-JUL-1997 01-JUL-1997 02-JUL-1997 02-JUL-1997 108,818.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-01-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-JUL-1997 B 01-JUL-1997 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,441.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-01-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-JUL-1997 B 01-JUL-1997 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS ------------------0.00 -788,036.67 788,036.67 0.00 -788,036.67 -788,036.67 0.00 -792,558.00 792,S58.00 0.00 -792,SS8.00 -792,558.00 0.00 -889,177.50 889,177.50 0.00 -889,177.SO -889' 177. so 0.00 -108,818.00 108,818.00 0.00 -300' 441. 00 300,441.00 0.00 Page 4 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS --------------------0.00 0.00 -788,036.67 788,036.67 0.00 0.00 -788,036.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 -792,S58.00 792,558.00 0.00 0.00 -792,558.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -889,177.SO 889, 177. so 0.00 0.00 -889,177.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 -108,818.00 108,818.00 0.00 0.00 -300' 441. 00 300,441.00 0.00 0.00 BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ ------------------1.000000000 98.S04S84 98.504584 1.000000000 98.504584 98.S04S84 1.000000000 99.069750 99.0697SO 1.000000000 99.069750 99.069750 1.000000000 98.797SOO 98.797SOO 1.000000000 98.797SOO 98.797500 1.000000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000000 4 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST ..; ,, ,._' CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE BASE: USO 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 TMlOO SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ BASE AMOUNT/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COM PL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 22,916.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-07-JUL-1997 -22,916.00 -22,916.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 07-JUL-1997 22,916.00 22,916.00 1.000000 B 07-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,516.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-08-JUL-1997 -43,516.00 -43,516.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 08-JUL-1997 43,516.00 43,516.00 1.000000 B 08-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 7,117.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-14-JUL-1997 -7,117.00 -7,117.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 14-JUL-1997 7,117.00 7,117.00 1.000000 B 14-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,793.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-16-JUL-1997 -2,793.00 -2,793.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 16-JUL-1997 2,793.00 2,793.00 1.000000 B 16-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 10,783.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-18-JUL-1997 -10,783.00 -10,783.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 18-JUL-1997 10,783.00 10,783.00 1.000000 B 18-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 313.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-21-JUL-1997 -313.00 -313 .00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 21-JUL-1997 313.00 313. 00 1.000000 B 21-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 23,166.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-23-JUL-1997 -23,166.00 -23,166.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 23-JUL-1997 23,166.00 23,166.00 1.000000 B 23-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-JUL-1997 -4,488,705.00 -4,488,705.00 99.749000 31364CXV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 16-JUL-1997 4,488,705.00 4,488,705.00 99.749000 B CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NY -----------0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-JUL-1997 -103,573.75 -103,573.75 99.749000 ·--~----~ -- Page 5 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE 31364CXV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 16-JUL-1997 IB ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-JUL-1997 31364CXV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 16-JUL-1997 FC CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NY 16-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 912827S29 07.750% 11/30/1999 DD 11/30/94 23-JUL-1997 B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 912827S29 07.750% 11/30/1999 DD 11/30/94 23-JUL-1997 IB ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 8,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 912827529 07.750% 11/30/1999 DD 11/30/94 23-JUL-1997 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 23-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997 FC LEHMAN BROS INC 31-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997 9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 29-AUG-1997 B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997 9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 29-AUG-1997 IB ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 9128272Wl 06.500% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 23-JUL-1997 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- Page 6 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS 0.00 0.00 -4,592,278.75 -4,592,278.75 0.00 -8,308,750.00 8,308,750.00 0.00 -89,781.42 0.00 0.00 -8' 398' 531. 42 -8' 398' 531. 42 0.00 -33,621,290.82 -33,621,290.82 0.00 -24,319,224.00 24,319,224.00 0.00 -440,706.52 0.00 0.00 -11,159,843.75 11,159,843.75 0.00 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS 0.00 0.00 0.00 -4,592,278.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 -8,308,750.00 8,308,750.00 0.00 0.00 -89' 781. 42 0.00 0.00 0.00 -8' 398' 531. 42 0.00 0.00 0.00 -33,621,290.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 -24,319,224.00 24,319,224.00 0.00 0.00 -440,706.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 -11,159,843.75 11,159,843.75 0.00 0.00 ---·------------------- BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ 99.749000 1.000000000 99.749000 99.749000 1.000000000 103.859375 103.859375 1.000000000 103.859375 103.859375 1.000000000 103.859375 103.859375 1.000000000 100.548800 100.548800 1.000000000 101. 330100 101.330100 1.000000000 101. 330100 101.330100 1.000000000 101.453125 101.453125 1.000000000 "' OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 111 000 1 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 9128272Wl 06.500% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 23-JUL-1997 IB ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11 1 000 1 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 9128272Wl 06.500% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 23-JUL-1997 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 23-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20 1 000 1 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 18-JUN-1997 999ABG079 7.000% 07/15/2002 23-JUL-1997 FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 23-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20 1 000 1 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 17-JUL-1997 999ABJ818 7.000% 08/15/2002 21-AUG-1997 B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-JUL-1997 02581RUW1 07/30/1997 18-JUL-1997 S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4001000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-JUL-1997 02581RUW1 07/30/1997 18-JUL-1997 IS ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -400 1 000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-JUL-1997 02581RUW1 07/30/1997 18-JUL-1997 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 18-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2 1 600,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 31-JUL-1997 02680JVN8 08/22/1997 31-JUL-1997 S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS ------------------ -99,631.15 0.00 0.00 -11,259,474.90 -11,259,474.90 0.00 -20,175,000.00 -20,175,000.00 0.00 -20,237,500.00 20,237,500.00 0.00 397,845.56 -397,845.56 0.00 1, 421.11 0.00 0.00 399,266.67 399,266.67 0.00 2,576,036.67 -2,576,036.67 0.00 Page 7 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS -------------------- -99, 631.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 -11,259,474.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 -20,175,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -20,237,500.00 20,237,500.00 0.00 0.00 397,845.56 -397,845.56 0.00 0.00 1,421.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 399,266.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,576,036.67 -2,576,036.67 0.00 0.00 LOCAL .,., ~ BASE: USO TMlOO PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ ------------------ 101.453125 101.453125 1.000000000 101.453125 101.453125 1.000000000 100.875000 100.875000 1.000000000 101.187500 101.187500 1.000000000 99.461390 99.461390 1.000000000 99.461390 99.461390 1.000000000 99.461390 99.461390 1.000000000 99.078333 99.078333 1.000000000 MELLON TRUST OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE --------------------------------------------------------------LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,600,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 02680JVN8 08/22/1997 IS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 -2,600,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 31-JUL-1997 02680JVN8 08/22/1997 31-JUL-1997 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 31-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 18-JUL-1997 07815JUV8 07/29/1997 18-JUL-1997 S MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES -FIX----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 07815JUV8 07/29/1997 IS 18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 18-JUL-1997 07815JUV8 07/29/1997 18-JUL-1997 FC MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES -FIX 18-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 16-JUL-1997 36959HUP0 07/23/1997 16-JUL-1997 S MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES -FIX----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 36959HUP0 07/23/1997 IS 16-JUL-1997 16-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 16-JUL-1997 36959HUP0 07/23/1997 16-JUL-1997 FC MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES -FIX 16-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 36959HVF1 08/15/1997 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 Page 8 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS 15,192.66 0.00 0.00 2,591,229.33 2,591,229.33 0.00 1, 391,000. 33 -1,391,000.33 0.00 6,659.73 0.00 0.00 1,397,660.06 1,397,660.06 0.00 4,535,860.67 -4,535,860.67 0.00 59,210.94 0.00 0.00 4,595,071.61 4,595,071.61 0.00 9,124,828.33 -9,124,828.33 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS 15,192.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,591,229.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,391,000.33 -1,391,000.33 0.00 0.00 6,659.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,397,660.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,535,860.67 -4,535,860.67 0.00 0.00 59,210.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,595,071.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,124,828.33 -9,124,828.33 ----~------ BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ 99.078333 99.078333 1.000000000 99.078333 99.078333 1.000000000 99.357166 99.357166 1.000000000 99.357166 99.357166 1.000000000 99.357166 99.357166 1.000000000 98.605667 98.605667 1.000000000 98.605667 98.605667 1.000000000 98.605667 98.605667 1.000000000 99.182917 99.182917 a OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 36959HVF1 08/15/1997 IS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 -9,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 31-JUL-1997 36959HVF1 08/15/1997 31-JUL-1997 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 31-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 63743CVN0 08/22/1997 S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -8,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 63743CVNO 08/22/1997 IS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 -8,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 18-JUL-1997 63743CVNO 08/22/1997 18-JUL-1997 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 18-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 63743CVN0 08/22/1997 S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 63743CVNO 08/22/1997 IS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 63743CVNO 08/22/1997 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS ------------------0.00 53,973.34 0.00 0.00 9,178,801.67 9,178,801.67 0.00 8,124,423.34 -8,124,423.34 0.00 31,649.72 0.00 0.00 8,156,073.06 8,156,073.06 0.00 7,728,110.00 -7,728,110.00 0.00 45,435.00 0.00 0.00 7,773,545.00 7,773,545.00 0.00 Page 9 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS a) '". BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ --------------------------------------0.00 1.000000000 0.00 53,973.34 99.182917 0.00 99.182917 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 9,178,801.67 99.182917 0.00 99.182917 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 8,124,423.34 99.078333 -8,124,423.34 99.078333 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 31,649.72 99.078333 0.00 99.078333 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 8,156,073.06 99.078333 0.00 99.078333 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 7,728,110.00 99.078333 -7, 728,110.00 99.078333 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 45,435.00 99.078333 0.00 99.078333 0.00 . 1.000000000 0.00 7,773,545.00 99.078333 0.00 99.078333 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 ·---------··-·-~ .. OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETT.LE DATE/ COMPL DATE LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -889,178.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-02-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 02-JUL-1997 s 02-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -91,027.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-03-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 03-JUL-1997 s 03-JUL-1997 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -138,625.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-03-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 03-JUL-1997 s 03-JUL-1997 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -94,555.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-09-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 09-JUL-1997 s 09-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -85,796.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-14-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 14-JUL-1997 s 14-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,000.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-18-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 18-JUL-1997 s 18-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -6.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-25-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 25-JUL-1997 s 25-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -72' 751.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-31-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 31-JUL-1997 s 31-JUL-1997 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 US TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 ------- Page 10 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS 889,178.00 -889,178.00 0.00 91,027.00 -91,027.00 0.00 138' 625 .00 -138' 625. 00 0.00 94,555.00 -94,555.00 0.00 85,796.00 -85,796.00 0.00 47,000.00 -47,000.00 0.00 6.00 -6.00 0.00 72 '751.00 -72 '751.00 0.00 7,098,437.50 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS 889,178.00 -889,178.00 0.00 0.00 91,027.00 -91,027.00 0.00 0.00 138' 625 .00 -138' 625. 00 0.00 0.00 94,555.00 -94,555.00 0.00 0.00 85,796.00 -85,796.00 0.00 0.00 47,000.00 -47,000.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 -6.00 0.00 0.00 72 '751.00 -72,751.00 0.00 0.00 7,098,437.50 ------- BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000000 1.000000 1.000000 1.000000000 101.406250 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE 912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997 S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 US TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997 IS ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -7,000,000.00 US TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997 FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 23-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997 S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997 IS ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -10,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 23-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997 9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997 9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997 IS ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997 9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 31-JUL-1997 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS -6,908,125.00 190,312.50 179,279.89 0.00 0.00 7,277,717.39 7' 277' 717. 39 0.00 10,648,476.56 -10,362,187.50 286,289.06 Page 11 268,919.84 0.00 0.00 10,917,396.40 10,917,396.40 0.00 9,127,265.63 -9,081,089.22 46,176.41 120,050.95 0.00 0.00 9,247,316.58 9,247,316.58 0.00 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS -6,908,125.00 190, 312. so 0.00 179,279.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 7' 277' 717. 39 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,648,476.56 -10,362,187.50 286,289.06 0.00 268,919.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,917,396.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,127,265.63 -9,081,089.22 46,176.41 0.00 120,050.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,247,316.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 a\ ., BASE: USO TM100 LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ 101.406250 1.000000000 101.406250 101.406250 1.000000000 101.406250 101.406250 1.000000000 101.414062 101.414062 1.000000000 101.414062 101.414062 1.000000000 101.414062 101.414062 1.000000000 101.414062 101.414062 1.000000000 101.414062 101.414062 1.000000000 101.414062 101.414062 1.000000000 OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE -24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997 9128272T8 06.375%. 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997 S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997 9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997 IS ----------- LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997 9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 31-JUL-1997 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 999ABG079 7.000% 07/15/2002 S BANQUE NATIONALE DE, PARIS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 999ABG079 7.000% 07/15/2002 FC BANQUE NATIONALE DE, PARIS MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 02581RU84 07/08/1997 MT BOND MATURITY LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 26354AUE2 07/14/1997 MT BOND MATURITY LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,700,000.00 OU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 26354AUE2 07/14/1997 MT BOND MATURITY ---------------- 17-JUL-1997 23-JUL-1997 17-JUL-1997 23-JUL-1997 23-JUL-1997 08-JUL-1997 08-JUL-1997 08-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS 24,337,500.00 -24,216,237.92 121,262.08 320,135.87 0.00 0.00 24,657,635.87 24,657,635.87 0.00 20,260,937.50 -20,175,000.00 85,937.50 20,260,937.50 20,260,937.50 0.00 4,273,578.89 -4,273,578.89 0.00 496,933.33 -496,933.33 0.00 1,689,573.33 -1,689,573.33 0.00 Page 12 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS 24,337,~00.00, -24,216,237.92. 121,262.08 0.00 320,135.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,657,635.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,260,937.50 -20,175,000.00 85,937.50 0.00 20,260,937.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,273,578.89 -4,273,578.89 0.00 0.00 496,933.33 -496 I 933 • 33 0.00 . 0.00 1,689,573.33 -1,689,573.33 0.00 0.00 BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ 101.406250 101.406250 1.000000000 101.406250 101.406250 1.000000000 101.406250 101.406250 1.000000000 101.304688 101.304688 1.000000000 101.304688 101.304688 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 d OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 EMERSON ELEC DISC 29101CU16 07/01/1997 MT BOND MATURITY LIQUID OPER-PIMCO MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE Ol-JUL-1997 01-JUL-1997 Ol-JUL-1997 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS 299,948.75 -299,948.75 0.00 -2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 03-JUL-1997 2,379,429.33 313385HR0 MAT 07/03/1997 03-JUL-1997 -2,379,429.33 MT BOND MATURITY 03-JUL-1997 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 18-JUL-1997 691,643.17 313589JG9 MAT 07/18/1997 18-JUL-1997 -691,643.17 MT BOND MATURITY 18-JUL-1997 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 09-JUL-1997 199,172.00 34110AU92 07/09/1997 09-JUL-1997 -199,172.00 MT BOND MATURITY 09-JUL-1997 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 31-JUL-1997 99,878.89 34539TUX1 07/31/1997 31-JUL-1997 -99,878.89 MT BOND MATURITY 31-JUL-1997 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-JUL-1997 495,566.67 34539TU37 07/03/1997 03-JUL-1997 -495,566.67 MT BOND MATURITY 03-JUL-1997 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-JUL-1997 198,226.67 34539TU37 07/03/1997 03-JUL-1997 -198,226.67 MT BOND MATURITY 03-JUL-1997 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 07-JUL-1997 1,488,994.17 34539TU78 07/07/1997 07-JUL-1997 -1,488,994.17 MT BOND MATURITY 07-JUL-1997 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 23-JUL-1997 1,479,085.00 36959HUP0 07/23/1997 23-JUL-1997 -1,479,085.00 -------------------- Page 13 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS 299,948.75 -299,948.75 0.00 0.00 2,379,429.33 -2,379,429.33 0.00 0.00 691,643.17 -691,643.17 0.00 0.00 199,172.00 -199,172.00 0.00 0.00 99,878.89 -99,878.89 0.00 0.00 495,566.67 -495,566.67 0.00 0.00 198,226.67 -198,226.67 0.00 0.00 1,488,994.17 -1,488,994.17 0.00 0.00 1,479,085.00 -1,479,085.00 --~---------- a I ~ BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 OCSG000100 CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MT BOND MATURITY LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -400,000.00 IBM DISC 44922AU32 07/03/1997 INTEREST MT BOND MATURITY LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 63743CUJO 07/18/1997 MT BOND MATURITY U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 02581RU84 07/08/1997 IT LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 26354AUE2 07/14/1997 IT LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 26354AUE2 07/14/1997 IT LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 EMERSON ELEC DISC 29101CU16 07/01/1997 IT LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 313385HR0 MAT 07/03/1997 IT LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 313589JG9 MAT 07/18/1997 IT 23-JUL-1997 ' 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 08-JUL-1997 08-JUL-1997 08-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997 Ol-JUL-1997 Ol-JUL-1997 01-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 18-J'lJL-1997 18-JUL-1997 Page 14 0.00 398, 211. 67 -398' 211. 67 0.00 791,954.44 -791,954.44 0.00 26,421.11 26,421.11 0.00 3,066.67 3,066.67 0.00 10,426.67 10,426.67 0.00 51.25 51.25 0.00 20,570.67 20,570.67 0.00, 8,356.83 8,356.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 398,211.67 -398' 211. 67 0.00 0.00 791,954.44 -791,954.44 0.00 0.00 26,421.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,066.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,426.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 51. 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,570.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,356.83 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 100.000000 100.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 --------- G OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 34110AU92 07/09/1997 IT LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 34539TUX1 07/31/1997 IT LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 34539TU37 07/03/1997 IT LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 34539TU37 07/03/1997 IT LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 34539TU78 07/07/1997 IT LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 36959HUP0 07/23/1997 IT LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 IBM DISC 44922AU32 07/03/1997 IT LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 63743CUJ0 07/18/1997 IT LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE 09-JUL-1997 09-JUL-1997 09-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 07-JUL-1997 07-JUL-1997 07-JUL-1997 23-JUL-1997 23-JUL-1997 23-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997 Page 15 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS 828.00 828.00 0.00 121.11 121.11 0.00 4,433.33 4,433.33 0.00 1,773.33 1,773.33 0.00 11,005.83 11,005.83 0.00 20,915.00 20,915.00 0.00 1,788.33 1,788.33 0.00 8,045.56 8,045.56 0.00 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS 0.00 828.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,433.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,773.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,005.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,915.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1, 788. 33 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,045.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 ... , ... BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 ·-----------------·--·--. OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ TRANS CODE BROKER EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE 0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ 990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST CD AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-01-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-JUL-1997 IT 01-JUL-1997 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-01-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-JUL-1997 IT 01-JUL-1997 Page 16 LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ GAIN LOSS 11.06 11.06 0.00 1,192.81 1,192.81 0.00 443.69 443.69 0.00 BASE AMOUNT/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS 11.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,192.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 443.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 BASE: USO TMlOO LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/ 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000 OMTS: PDC: FAHR: All EXEC: STEER: JT.BDS: 8/27 /97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL CONTACT FOR INl:ORMATION (Originator) 720, Jim Harris, 5063 Division No., Name, and Extension JOB NO. J-31-3 PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE, JOB NO. J-31-3 (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to add instrumentation and equipment to automate processes at the Plant No. 1 Headworks, and provide additional capability to monitor process information from a remote location. Recommended Action(s): 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2) waive bid irregularities as to form; and 3) authorize award of a contract for Job No. J-31-3, Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, to Systems Integrated, to add instrumentation and equipment to automate processes at the Plant No. 1 Headworks, in a total amount of $694,000. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Final EIR Approved on 7/19/89 and Notice of Determination filed on 7/20/89 6/25/97 CURRENT BUDGET/COST INFORMATION TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $739,000 SOURCE: CORF Schedule/Line Items: C.4.a AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET INFORMATION First Year in Budget:: '91-'92 Master Plan Estimate: $850,000 Year of F'nt Costs: '91-'92 THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR BUDGET AMOUNT $739,000 ORIGINAL BUDGET TOTAL $850,000.00 ORIGINAL BID, PO, CONTRACT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES If YES, state number: _Permanent _ Limited Term Revised DSl14J97 H:\WP .DTA\ENG\ENG\J-31-3\AIT.723 CURRENT YEAR- TO-DATE EXPENDITURES $0 PREVIOUS BUDGET CHANGES $463,760.00 CHANGE ORDERS, FUNDS PREY. APPROVED $0.00 YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL (Total Budget plus Transfers) $739,000 $739,000 BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL THISAIT PROJECT BUDGET $0.00 $1,313,760.00 AMOUNT AMENDED REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AIT AMOUNT $694,000.00 $694,000.00 REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES NO NOT APPLICABLE If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Page 1of2 ~~ 0-~ 5?¥'14\ Jen Originator ------' ~ I Date ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List): 1. ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List) 1. Budaet Information Table 2. Bid Summary 3. General Counsel Memorandum dated July 23, 1997 4. Shasta Electric Bid Protest Letter Dated July 22, 1997 5. Shasta Electric Bid Protest Withdrawal Letter dated August 7, 1997 The Boards of Directors approved the plans and specifications for this project for bid at their meeting of June 25, 1997, two bids were submitted for the project Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job No. J-31-3. The bids ranged from a low of $694,000 submitted by Systems Integrated, to a high of $746, 100. The engineer's estimate was $700,000. Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job J-31-3, will provide additional automation which will allow operations staff to operate and monitor plant systems from the Control Center. These upgraded facilities will include additional fiber optic communication, process control equipment and miscellaneous additional control equipment. This work will ultimately increase system reliability and performance. Due to a printing error, several pages of the Detailed Specifications were omitted. These pages included background information about the contractor and other miscellaneous items that did not effect the final bid amount. Due to this information not being included with the bid documents, Shasta Electric submitted a protest to awarding this work to Systems Integrated. Subsequently the protest was withdrawn. It is the opinion of the Districts General Counsel that this omission was inconsequential and does not effect the final price quoted for this Bid Proposal. The Director of Engineering recommends waiving the bid irregularities associated with this Bid Proposal. The Director of Engineering recommends award of a contract to Systems Integrated, in the amount of $694,000. JRH:jmf H:\WP .OTA \ENG\ENG\J-31-3\AIT. 723 c: Department Head A GM-Ad ministration A GM-Operations General Manager Revised 05114197 H:\WP .OTA \ENG\ENG\J-31-3\AIT.723 Page 2 of2 TASK BUDGET (ADOPTED BY CORF) DESIGN Consultant $475,000 Staff $32,000 CONSTRUCTION Contractor $718,500 Staff $88,260 TOTAL $1,313,760 H:\WP .DTA\ENG\ENG\J-31.3\BUDTBL.AIT BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade Job No. J-31-3 FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE FUNDS $475,000 $475,000 $475,000 $32,000 $32,000 $32,000 $0 $694,000 $694,000 $0 $88,260 $88,260 $5,000 $595,260 $694,000 $1,289,260 $512,000 ~ • -I' ESTIMATED% COMPLETE TO DATE 100% 100% 0% 6% July 22, 1997 11:00 a.m. BID TABULATION JOB NO. J-31-3 PROJECT TITLE: PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGBADE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $700.000. ============================================== TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID ============================================== 1. SYSTEMS INTEGRATED $694,000.00 2. SHASTA ELECTRIC $746, 100.00 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Systems Integrated in the bid amount of $694,000.00 as the lowest and best bid. H:\WP .OTA \ENG\ENG\J-31-3\BIDTAB.LST David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering • ./-I~ '{ ~July22, 1997 SHASTA ELECTRIC LP LIC. NO. 683876 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County I 0844 Ellis A venue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attn: Ref: Mr. David Ludwin, P.E. Plant I Headwork's No. 2 Control System Upgrade Job No. J-31-3 Subject: Project Award to System Integrated Dear Mr. Ludwin, ?.ECEIVED Ef\iGINEERIN(J DEPARTMENT JUL 2 4 1997 COUNTY SANITATIQtl DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY In accordance with the Districts policies and procedures, Shasta Electric formally protests the award of Job No. J-31-3 to the apparent low bidder (Systems Integrated). Upon review of Systems Integrated's bid proposal the following required documents were not provided and therefore result in a non-responsive bid as submitted. a) Section 51 of the Contract Documents including but not limited to Sections 51-7, 51-8, 51-9, 51-10 and 51-11. b) Section 52-0110 Item C in its entirety. Shasta Electric has recently completed Job No. J-31-2 for the Districts which is practically a mirror image of Job No. J-31-3. This project was completed ahead of st:hedule and to the satisfaction of the Districts (see attached Districts Correspondence). Shasta Electric respectfully acknowledges that the District has the right to either reject all bids associated with Job J-31-3 or to award to the low responsive bidder. At this time rejecting all bids could undermine not only the public bidding fair policies but also provide the Districts with an inferior project. It is with this in mind that Shasta Electric formally requests the District to award Job No. J-31-3 to the low responsive bidder Shasta Electric. Respectfully, Dennis Derieg Vice President DD/dp 655 BREA CANYON ROAD •WALNUT, CALIFORNIA 91789 • (909) 594-2341 P.O. BOX 488 •WALNUT, CALIFORNIA 91788-0488 •FAX (909) 594-4134 April 29. 1997 Date: Location: Attendees: • • MEETING MJNYTES Ocean Outfall Control System Upgrade Job No. J-31-2 April 22, 1997 10:00 a.m. Plant 2 Construction Mgmt. Conference Room Dean Fisher. OCSD Jim Elo. OCSD Jim Niswonger, Shasta Electric Frank Steiger, CH2MHill Joe Chester. OCSD Wade Chilson, OCSD Randy Tinsley, Canus Corp. This is the final project meeting for this project. Currently the project is 100% complete and in service. This meeting was held to specifically discuss any outstanding punch list work, and outstanding aocumentat!on issues. Punch List Work The contractor was given direction regarding the final remaining work on the project on February 11. This "punch" list was developed from Construction Management input as wen as feedback from the Final Inspection held with other Districts• departments on January 21, 1997. For reference, this list is attached and was reviewed during the meeting. All the items are completed with exception of the following: OOBS PCMS. Item 1 -All of the jumper routing work is completed except labeling. The contractor will provide labeling for these jumpers by next week. OOBS PCMS. Item 5 • The required test plugs were given to the Districts during the meeting. These were given to Wade Chilson for maintenance use. OOBS PCMS, Item 6 -The nameplate legends on CB and CA were satisfied by the contractor, however since that time they have been removed. The contractor will print a new legend for the Districts. OOBS PCMS, Item 21 -This was determined to be out of the scope of the contract. OOBS PCMS. Item 28 ·All O&M information has been reviewed by the Districts. The contractor is currently making the required copies of this information for final transmittal to the Districts. Most as-built information has been reviewed and received by the Districts, including electronic copies of all drawings. One copy of the "markups" is still being reviewed by the Districts. Dean will return these plans and any review comments to the contrador. IFMS, Item 3 -The cover will be left as is. In lieu of this replacement. the contractor shall seal the floor opening of the new cabinet with grout. IFMS, Item 5 .. See OOBS PCMS. Item 28, above. I I :: I i . ! I J-31-2 Meeting Minutes 4/22/97 Page2 Software • The OOBS software documentation will be handled by the following: • Frank Steiger will E-Mail the OOBS PLC configuration with descriptors to Wade after the meeting. The IFMS software is already wen documented. For an practical purposes the software is final for the project. This software, however. will be continually refined and updated out of the scope of this project. Wade will make a hard copy for maintenance files. CH2MHill is also working on updating sections of the original OOBS Operation Manual provided by JCE. He said that they are nearing completion of these documents. • •• • •• •• I•. • •' ·-......... .. ·•··· One Final Note ........ '" The word •team" is used far too often to describe groups of individuals thrown together by circumstance who never really work together as a team. The use of this term becomes diluted to a point where true teamwork is not expected. nor is the value of teamwork recognized. Such is not the case here. The group below comprises the construction team for this project This project team represents a technically competent group ot individuals who focused on the project at hand, solved the problems as a group, and often chose the more difficult route for the good of the project. Every member of this team has a feeling of satisfaction and pride with the outcome of the project. As a member of this team, I am fortunate to have worked with this group. As a Districts representative for this project. the Districts would like to take this \ 1. \ \ j opportunity to say Athank you• for a job wen done. \ Shasta/Canus: Roger Cates, Jim Niswonger and Randy nnsley I \ CH2MHill: Alan Carrie, Dave Halverson and Frank Steiger . ~ CSDOC: Joe Chester, Wade Chilson, Dean Fisher, Jim Elo, Shamshad Hyder, Jim / 1 - ::~-d5ii~~:~~·--~~~-~~:-~~::·--·--··· .--···-·· .--------··' The meeting record above was compiled by Dean Fisher. If there is any discrepancy as to the accuracy or completeness of the record please notify him at once. If there are no comments received within 14 days after issuance, the minutes will be assumed correct and will become a part of the project record. OF:df l:\FISHER\JOBFILES\J..31 ·2'4--22·97.MTG Attachment c: J. Linder (file) C. Cervellone C. Lee D. Cook A. Carrie (CH2MHill) G. Jones S. Hyder L. Kraemer R. Thompson SHASTA ELECTRIC LP August 7. 1997 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attn: Mr. David Lud~ P.E. Ref: Plant I Headwork's No. 2 Control System Upgrade Job No. J-31-l LIC. NO. 683876 Subject: Project Award to System Integrated Dear Mr. Ludwin, Shasta Electric formally withdraws our protest letter for the above referenced project dated 7/2'2197. Respectfully" SHASTA ELECTRIC, LP ~ '~------Dennis ·eg Vice President DD/dp 655BRIACANION10AD •WALNUT. CALIFOINIA 91789 • (909) 594-2341 TOTAL P.01 1 .-----------------------. 0 COMM. INFO. ITEM 0 COMM. ACTION ITEM 0 JT. BOS.· CONSENT 0 JT. BOS. DISCUSSION (NON-CONSENT) 0 PUBLIC HEARING For Bd. Sec. Use Ontv f/_;l'J mT. BOS. MEETING DATE lb JT. BOS. AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE OMTS: PDC: FAHR: EXEC: STEER: JT.BDS: 8/27/97 COMM. ID. NO. OMTS ___ _ PDC ____ _ FAHR. ___ _ EXEC ___ __.. STEER....__ __ _ DISTRICT NO. All AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Originator) 720, Wendy Sevenandt, 5058 Division No., Name, and Extension JOB NO. P2-46-2, RECLAIMED WATER EXTENSION TO HEADWORKS "C" AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to extend the reclaimed water piping to Headworks "C" for improved reliability of water supply for the main sewage pumps. Recommended Action{s): 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 2) authorize award of a contract for Job No. P2-46-2, Reclaimed Water Extension to Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, to Atlas Allied, Inc., extending reclaimed water piping to Headworks "C", in a total amount of $139,680. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO Final EIR Approved on 7/19/89 and Notice of Determination filed on 7/20/89 CURRENT BUDGET/COST INFORMATION TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $784,000 SOURCE: CORF Schedule/Line Items: B.6.a. AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET INFORMATION First Year in Budget: '91-'92 Master Plan Estimate: 4,615,000 Year of First Costs: '91-'92 THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR BUDGET AMOUNT $784,000 ORIGINAL BUDGET TOTAL $4,615,000.00 ORIGINAL BID, PO, CONTRACT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO If YES, state number: _ Permanent _ Limited Term Revised 04/10/97 H:\WP .DTA\ENG\ENG\P2-46-2\AITAWD.WPD DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: 6/25/97 CURRENT YEAR- TO-DATE EXPENDITURES $0 PREVIOUS BUDGET CHANGES ($852,000.00} CHANGE ORDERS, FUNDS PREV. APPROVED $0.00 YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL {Tola! Budget plus Transfers) $784,000 $784,000 BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL THISAIT PROJECT BUDGET $0.00 $3, 763,000. 00 AMOUNT AMENDED REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AIT AMOUNT $139,680.00 $139,680.00 REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Page 1of2 .....-----------------------,.-----------------.-.. ·---·· ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List): Originator Date Signatu Assistant General Manager (Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) This project is for the extension of a reclaimed water pipeline. This new pipeline will supply reclaimed water to the main pumps used to pump sewage through Treatment Plant No. 2. These pumps are located in the Headworks "C" facility. The extension of the reclaimed water line to these Main Sewage Pumps is necessary to resolve two issues concerning the current use of potable water at these pumps. The first issue is the reliability of the water supply. The second issue is a health concern. This project will improve the reliability of water feed to the pump seals while meeting Health Code requirements by changing the water supply from potable water to reclaimed water with plant water back-up. A new City Water Pump Station is under construction at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-46). During construction of this pump station, Operations became concerned that a loss of both Edison and Central Generation power sources would cause the City Water Pumps to shut-down. The shut-down of the City Water Pumps would cause the loss of cooling and lubricating water to the Main Sewage Pumps. These pumps are a critical process component, since the Main Sewage Pumps are critical for maintaining sewage flow through the treatment facilities. The reliability of water supply to these Main Sewage Pumps is improved by switching the water supply from potable water to reclaimed water with a plant water back-up. Health Code requirements do not allow the connection of potable water systems to processes that directly treat sewage. This switch from the potable water supply for the Main Sewage Pumps to reclaimed water will correct this. The plans and specifications for this project were approved for bid by the Boards of Directors at their meeting of June 25, 1997. On July 22, 1997, six bids were submitted for the project Reclaimed Water Extension to Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46-2. The bids ranged from a low of $139,680 submitted by Atlas Allied Inc., to a high of $167,000. The engineer's estimate was $160,000. The Director of Engineering recommends award of a contract to Atlas Allied, Inc., in the amount of $139,680. The funds for this project, Job No. P2-46-2, are allocated from the CORF line item for Job No. P2-46. Thus, the Budget Information Table shows the allocation of the entire line item budget of $3, 763,000 between the two projects, Job No. P2-46-2 and Job No. P2-46. WTS:jmf H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\P2-46-2\TEST.WPD c: Department Head AGM-Administration A GM-Operations General Manager Revised 04/10/97 H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\P2-46-2\TEST.WPD Page 2of2 TASK BUDGET (ADOPTED BY CORF) P2-46/P2-46-2 DESIGN-Consultant P2-46 $320,310 P2-46-2 $10,000 DESIGN-Staff $75,000 CONST. Contractor P2-46 $2,920,000 P2-46-2 $150,000 CONST. Consultant $80,000 CONST.Staff $207,690 TOTAL $3,763,000 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Reclaimed Water Extension to Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-46-2 FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED AUTHORIZED AUTHO~IZA TION TOTAL AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURE TO TO DATE REQUEST FUNDS DATE $320,310 $320,310 $320,310 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $2,774,854 $2,774,854 $1,831,000 -0-$139,680 $139,680 -0- $80,000 $80,000 $74,000 $207,690 $207,690 $124,614 $3,467,854 $139,680 $3,607,534 $2.434,924 H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\P2-46-2\AGENDA2.TBL ESTIMATED °lo COMPLETE TO DATE 100% 100% 100% 66% -0- 92% 40% 67% July 22, 1997 11:00 a.m. BID TABULATION JOB NO I PZ-46-2 PROJECT TITLE: RECLAIMED WATER EXTENSION TO HEAPWORKS •c• AT PLANT NO. 2 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $160 000 ============================================== TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID ============================================== 1. ATLAS ALLIED, INC. $139,680.00 2. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $144,596.00 3. S.S. MECHANICAL CORP. $147,537.00 4. OLSSON CONSTRUCTION $154,000.00 5. MARGA TE CONSTRUCTION $158,300.00 6. ECOLOGY CONSTRUCTION, INC. $167 ,000.00 7. 8. 9. 10. I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Atlas Allied, Inc. in the amount of $139,680.00 as the lowest and best bid. H:\WP .OTA \EN6\ENG\P2-46-2\BIDTAB.LST David A. Ludwin, P .E. Director of Engineering ~~: ... :·· ~~~~~ ,~.AGENDA PDC: FAHR: EXEC: 3 STEER: JT.BDS: 8/27/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: ITEM TRANSMITTAL CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Originator) 3720, Chuck Winsor, x5052 Division No., Name, and Extension CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3, IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 3 (District 3) : The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. to replace a portion and increase the capacity of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System in Imperial Highway between Beach and Harbor Boulevards in the City of La Habra. Recommended Actjon(s): 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation ; 2) Approve Addenda Nos. 1 , 2 and 3 to the Plans and Specifications ; and 3) Authorize award of a contract to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3 in the total amount of $4,587,000.00. CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: NO Final EIR Approved on July 19, 1989; and Notice of Determination filed on July 20, 1989 CURRENT BUDGET/COST INFORMATION TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $3,330,000.00 SOURCE: CIP • DISTRICT 3 Schedule/Line Items: D3, Item 8 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET INFORMATION First Year in Budget 1995 -96 Master Plan Estimate: $1,440,000 Year of First Costs: 1995 • 96 Il:llS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR BUDGET AMOUNT $2,000,000 ORIGINAL BUDGET TOTAL $3,330,000.00 ORIGINAL BID, PO, CONTRACT AMOUNT $4,587,000.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO If YES, state number: _ Permanent _ Limited Term Revised 05114197 H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\3.38-3\AWDCONT.AIT DATE OF MOST RECENT BQABJ2 ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: 6/25/97 CURRENT YEAR-YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES (Total Budget plus Transfers) $9,917 $1,990,083 $2,000,000 PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL CHANGES THISAIT PROJECT BUDGET N/A $1,562,000.00 $4,892,000.00 CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT N/A $4,587,000.00 $4,587,000.00 REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES, explain In ADDmONAL INFORMATION section Page 1of3 Signature Assistant General Manager (Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List): 1. ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List) 1. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation In the 1989 Master Plan, the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System was listed as deficient along Beach Boulevard in the northern portion of the City of Buena Park , in the southern portion of the City of La Habra and along Imperial Highway between Beach and Harbor Boulevards. This deficiency is due to projected residential development on both sides of Beach Boulevard and in the surrounding area formerly dominated by oil field operations. That development is now going forward and the increased sewer capacity is needed. This project is to install nearly two miles of gravity sewer in the number three (slow) lane of Imperial Highway between Beach and Harbor Boulevards. The City of La Habra has requested that the District include their job; a right turn lane, sidewalk, curb and gutter modifications and street improvements at the intersection of Idaho Street and Imperial Highway, in this bid. The City had estimated that their portion of the job would cost $0.45 million. Their portion of the bid came in at $300,856.30. This will be reimbursed to the District through an agreement approved by the District No. 3 Board of Directors, on May 28, 1997. ,,. Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the plans and specifications were necessary to provide various technical clarifications to the plans and specifications during the bidding period to estimate the cost of the job, traffic control and related Caltrans requirements. The cost of this project has increased during the design phase. The District had proposed a sewer alignment for the median of Imperial Highway to avoid the congested amount of utilities on the south side of the highway where there are two existing District No. 3 sewers. Caltrans rejected the proposed sewer alignment based on their belief that it would potentially increase traffic congestion during maintenance periods. The District had little choice but to use the same alignment as the oldest existing sewer, thereby requiring more work and greater costs because of the greater amount of existing utilities on that side of the highway. The latest approved alignment requires shutting down one or more travelled lanes to do the work which could have been avoided in the median. The Caltrans encroachment permit severely restricted the hours of work due to traffic control concerns and has required night work at most intersections. The result is an increase in construction costs. On August 14, 1997, eleven bids were received for said contract. The bids ranged from a high of $6,474,423.00 to a low of $4,587,000.00, submitted by Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. The latest Engineer's estimate was $3.76 million, including the City of La Habra work. After consulting with Boyle Engineering Corporation, the consultant on this project, they indicated that their estimate did not adequately reflect the very restrictive working hours imposed by Caltrans after the work was complete and the amount of additional effort needed to protect the existing utilities in place due to Caltrans changing the pipeline alignment. After opening of the bids the contractors were polled for reasons for the higher than estimated bid prices. The contractors evidently feel that they have no room and tittle time during the day to maneuver construction equipment due to Caltrans restrictions and have limited their risk of exposure by increasing their bids. Many contractors are now quite busy whereas during the past two to three years their bids were more favorable to the District because of restrictive economic conditions and fewer jobs available. Staff recommends approval of this contract to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $4,587,000.00 and a budget increase of $1,592,000, increasing the total budget for this project from $3,330,000.00 to $4,892,000 to cover the cost of the bid plus the previously approved allowance for staff costs during the course of the project. The money is available from District No. 3 reserves. A complete bid tabulation and recommendation is attached. RO\llS8d051141W Page2 of3 H:\WP .DTA\ENG\ENG\3-38-3\AWDCONT.AIT BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3 Contract No. 3-38-3 TASK 1997-98 FUNDS APPROVED AUTHORIZED BUDGET - DESIGN $130,000 CONSTRUCTION $3,000,000 STAFF COSTS $200,000 CITY OF $0.00 LA HABRA STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2-R-97, TO BE BID WITH CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3, and Reimbursed by the City. - TOTAL $3,330,000 CFW:jmf H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\3-38-3\AWDCONT.AIT c: Department Head AGM-Administration A GM-Operations General Manager Revised 05/14197 H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\3-38-3\AWOCONT.AIT TO DATE $105,000 $0.00 $200,000 $0.00 $305,000 THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE FUNDS $0.00 $105,000 $101,575 $4,286, 143. 70 $4,286, 143. 70 $0.00 $0.00 $200,000 $59,166 $300,856.30 $300,856.30 $0.00 $4,587,000.00 $4,892,000.00 $160,741 ESTIMATED o/o COMPLETE TO DATE 96.7% 0% 29.6% 0% - 3.29% Page 3of3 August14,1997 12:00 p.m. ADDENDA:-3_ BIO TABULATION CONTRACT NO. 3.39.3 ANP PROJECT NO. 2-R-97 PROJECT TITLE: IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER·HOLPER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM. BEACH 3 CITY OF LA HABRA STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR AN EASTBOUND BIGHT· TURN LANE AT THE IMPERIAL HIGHWAYODAHO STREET INTERSECTION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $3.763.348 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Mladen Buntlch Construction Co., Inc. $4,587 ,000.00 2. KEC Engineering $4,775,684.80 * 3. Albert W. Davis, Inc. $4,856,000.00 4. Southern California Underground $4,888,590.50 * 5. Christeve Corporation $5, 158,012.98 6. Steve Bubalo Construction $5,484,873.44 * 7. Fleming Engineering, Inc. $5,540,831.00 * 8. Vldo Artukovich & Son $5,737,469.00 * 9. Mike Prllch & Sons, Inc. $6,248,861.60 10. Vadnais Corporation $6,370,698.64 11. Murray Company $6,474.423.00 * Indicates corrected bid amount after reviewing bids I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid Is a responsible bid. t, therefore, recommend award to Mtaden Bunttch Construction Company, Inc. In the bid amount of $4,587,000.00 as the lowest and best bid. ~ ~ ~~~~i~P.~o f Dlrecto~~lneering H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG~-38-3\BIDTAB.LST D COMM. INFO. ITEM D COMM .. ACTION ITEM D JT. BOS. CONSENT D JT: BOS. DISCUSSION (NON-CONSENT) D~ ;_u:~::.EARING For Bd Sec. Use Onrv .lf#Jl!lYJT. BOS. MEETING DATE J/( . Ji. BOS. AGENDA ITEM NO. . MEETING DATE COMM. ID. NO. OMTS: OMTS PDC: PDC FAHR: ·FAHR EXEC: . EXEC STEER: :. STEER·· .. JT.BDS: 8/27/97 '··· · .... ,., .. ,, ,,. ' . DISTRICT NO. 7 and 14 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Originator) 3730, Jim Herberg, 5086 Division No., Name, and Extension ACCOMMODATION OF FLOWS AND TRANSFER OF CONNECTION FEES AGREEMENT BETWEEN IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD) AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 AND NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY (DISTRICT NO. 7 AND NO. 14): The Engineering Department requests approval of an agreement that provides for the accommodation of flows from two small drainage areas, in District No. 7, which are currently served by District No.14 through IRWD. Under this agreement District No. 7 will transfer to District 14 connection fees previously collected by the City of Newport Beach on behalf of District No. 7. Recommended Action(s): 1. Approve Accommodation of Flows and Transfer of Connection Fees Agreement with IRWD and CSDOC NO. 7 AND NO. 14 as described herein. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES NO NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC Date Notice of Exemption Filed: ITEM: -- Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_ and Notice of Determination filed on_ CURRENT YEAR CURRENTYEAR-CURRENT BUDGET/COST INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET INFORMATION First Year in Budget Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST INFORMATION Revised 05/14/97 H:\WP.DTA\ENG\3730\BERDANIS\FORMAT\AIT _IRWO.WPD EXPENDITURES N/A N/A ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET TOTAL CHANGES NIA NIA ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, PO, CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. AMOUNT APPROVED YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL (Total Budget plus Transfers) NIA N/A BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL THISAIT PROJECT BUDGET NIA $0.00 AMOUNT AMENDED REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AIT AMOUNT $0.00 Page 1of2 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES If YES, state number: _ Permanent Limited Term Originator Date CONCURRENCES: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES NO NOT APPLICABLE If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List): 1. Accommodation of Flows and Connection Fees Agreement between CSDOC No. 7, No. 14 and IRWD. 2. Legal Description with Exhibit A and B ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List) 1. Two small drainage areas in DISTRICT NO. 7, referred herein as "Parcel A" and "Parcel B," are served by DISTRICT NO. 14 through IRWD. Both "Parcel A" and "Parcel B" are located in the northerly portion of the City of Newport Beach; "Parcel A" is located east of Jamboree Road, between Bristol and Bayview Way and "Parcel B" is located east of Jamboree Road, northerly of University Drive and adjacent to San Diego Creek. "Parcel A" is currently occupied by Fletcher Jones Motors, an automobile dealership and 11Parcel B" by Irvine Apartment Communities, a large apartment complex. Because there are no DISTRICT NO. 7 facilities within a reasonable distance to serve these areas, the two sites must receive sewer service from IRWD. The City of Newport Beach collected connection charges for both sites on behalf of District No. 7 when building permits were taken. Although, both sites are physically located in District No. 7, they are, in fact, served by District 14 through IRWD. Therefore, it is recommended that District No. 7 transfer the connection fees previously collected by the City of Newport Beach to District No. 14. Ninety-five (95%) of the total connection fees collected by the City are $85,078.46 for 11Parcel A" and $707,350.00 for "Parcel B." Five (5%) percent of the total connection fees will be retained by the City of Newport Beach, pursuant to agreement with the District as reimbursement for its administrative costs. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Revised 05114197 H:\WP.OTA\ENG\3730\BERDANIS\FORMAT\AIT _IRWD.WPD Page 2of2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government C~de Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13and14 held on ~ D<? , 19??, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ~ ~P , 19f'?. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this o2l;;tit.day of -~._,...._ __ , 19fZ BS/FormslF27A Penny Kyle, ret Boards of Dire tor County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE DATE L .. 4 Ti/1114.6 A I 3/ 1'J/1'l ; .... . , . ... ~ _ ... . ' . " .. ·~ ·-.. .ft, ..... ~r..····d1.·:·; trl: i::!~Ytnnc:e~::n·a th~ ;·projtictsnowunderv~~ :.Reclaune :;· '.. ~umcledbfngwatersystemto toilthaets;t suppandllurinalses re-3>9'~-~~~~~. , t · · · .. · · · .. ' ·" """ WaterResourcesBoard;·i(~ .. ~~~~j ·;~.:.· · ........ :~? .. ~~l"~:}·:~:· ·~,.;·i·:.;.: .• ~·.::.. lna20-storylrvineofficetower. · . · For alJ.that. rec1a1meci witet~·~ ··Waste·Water =an~::.~· i~~~of.:..;:= >r;. .. . . . " • · , . · syetem at an elementary school farnia. · .. ,,,. · ·-r.~i "'.·~·;~:;~~ ·> ,M· ~v--,.a·:·:;:?Y:·qE·· _.ra;_.·~~·s' .... e: ·:!~· .. ·?~~{; .; .. -;.r:dbetba!s:o~~ :~:::1::8:e~=~~~~ , . :f /'::; · •uaeates the grass but does not · Irvine Ran~·where:neirl1':"-· ·: .· ; ~~-~·i; send any water. to the surface, quarter Of the;~ter:comea.lfrom.l: . · .. ,. ·. . . .. ·. .. .... ' where it could come In contact treated-oe:·..,fo>~.~r'•Jii'~,,tt;-~~ :Sta.-.te ... ,., .. '"Thirs .•. 1 .. J.··>t, wtthchlldren. . :"It's•-~·-~~i . s . The Orange County Water ms~ If you juSt'let'th!s.water·~~r·BBldi.~. i .·· · . ·· , trlct is now considering plans ~ ·'.Jaffe, who _spent hfi:.law,~:ichoo~~" , . . ., . . . · ·. . · ·r ·, .. : . ezpand its reclamaUon operation ~dent loan to start· an· arpnieif . · .. · · ·" . ~.f~~··?~· ··~. using treated waste water from the farm In ~8'Bhadow of'.8aJ11Jose'~ I, · • R~ycllng: ~tte ·:.c.1; '~ · :. • county's sanitation districts. · treatment .p!Snt,' where htFgrowsi· . -..n .. ~•·' c,....,._ the -.....:.-• · The widespread use of waste · vegetableswdnglOcal~alnf~-1"'\;A uauur, P1~-~ water ts not without doubters. En-teclalmedwate? -~ ..,,.~-r:.f-":"'·1-"l.'.io#ilr on the rise. San Diego is at'· . vl.ronmentallsts and Newport '. . People. sueh' ~.Jaffe: ~ftmd~/ .. · .. · Beach residents are fighting plans poJntlng out'tbat whll~·the· state's~ artting edge of what : ... :\ .: . by Irvine Ranch to flush treated rellanNevadace anondwathetee-.:Cofroloramdo· thRle Sv.lerei'rats7.· . · · ~ . water through .the San Joaquin backers see as wave of . · · Manh and Into Upper Newport coming under attack. recycled wa-/ fu din · · ted. Bay. Opponents fear the treated ter ts the one 8'lU1'Ce in-California tore: sen g trm . . sewage will foul the bay,' a fear· . that ts srowtng. . . ... :: •"'i~·~· ... : :· .. ttts also drought-proof./'·"' i~ ·.; .. ~: sewage back to the tap. · ·· wateromc:.= !8::1= ~ . And because reclafmed. water ts~ By JIU. LFDVY TIMES STAFF WRITER. In an effort tO help quench California's unending thirst, offi- cials are set to embark on unusual plans to turn trea~ &e\Ylle fnto drinking water. · < . · San Diego ts preparing to pipe ·. water from the local sewage treat- ment pJant ~Uy into the city's second-largest drinking watel'. res- ervoir. • Communities in the South Bay_. and Livermore, Calif., have re-: cenUy joined the Orange Co1Dlty Water District In approving the Injection -of treated waste water Into undergroun~ supplies ~!or tap water. Water recovered from treated sewage has already become an .Integral part of the state's water supply. Despite high costs· and worries over public squeamishness, the use of "recycled" water has increased about. 309' In . the . last year. . . . . '.· ., . It is being used to make snow for · ~ I aid areas, srow hay, make news• print and ·concrete. · dye carpets, , .,.hose~ Jandfil1s and flP.cooJiDB ·-· t.Owera tn on refineries. · . Water reclamation in some form has been going on for a long time. Irvine is the granddaddy of recla- mation in California, setting an as yet unrealized goal. in . the early 1960s of recycling all its sewage water for non-potable uses. The Irvine Ranch Water District u sUll a leader, recenUy introducing re- claimed water to office air- conditioning systems. Continued from At produced 1ocally·by clUes, :it"ts aJso.·. In a larger sense, critics say that largely pollUcs-proof. ,.No one. can' the process is expensive and may : take it away from us."' said Farle ak ·. Hartling, water reuse coordinator of m e many water drinkers opt for the Sanitation Districts of.-1.at An.;..: the botUed variety or tum up their _,_ · ~ . , .. '· ?.:'·;;'" ··:•H noses and say, ''Yuck!" 0~ a result. the uses ·of~~'. But Paul Gagliardo of San Di-ultlplied ,. .. f.ckly eoo's Metropolitan Wastewater water have m · so 'i'!!'l 0 that health officials have. been Department believes that hJs city is scrambifng to keep up. New· 1'8'1· : about to begin "pioneering a proc-lations should be completed this.: ess • • • to get people comfortable year, said David Spath. cbief of the·: with the idea of drinking treated division of drfn1dng' water with the sewage." state Department. of_ Health ~~ California spews enough sewage Ices. ,_. .• · · · · · t:, · · .. into the ocean to meet a third to a The rules are expected tO · s0on half of the state's urban water eliminate one of the ironies of this needs, Gagliardo said emerging ~~...a~lys its-~.:... Be is among a small group of caUon as a wu.aiuuua waste. , · zealots who dream of a future in Until then. plant workers must fill which Californians drink sewage, out lengthy reports when they spill processed to levels similar to bot-reclafmed water, even if it is drink·· Ued water. : Ing water quality. .-' . Those views are shared by cru-· · Desptte the regulatory confusion. saders such as Santa Rosa organic recycled water ts beJng used· in· a : farmer Lawrence Jaffe, who sells numberOfways. · vegetables nourished with recy-lthasbeenproposedasasourceof: cled water using the slogan, "Close I water to do la1Dldry at San Quentin the loop.'' and Bahman Sheikh, a · Prison. It is even being pumped: San Francisco consultant who likes under the sea floor off U>ng Beach to make the point by gulping down to keep the harbor area from sinking. a long, cool glass of tertiary efflu-due to oil extraction. The oil compa- enl Dies have used tap water far this "There is no reason to Oush purpose-enough to supply· 20,000 toilets with pure water from Mono 1 people with water for a year-but Basin," Shei~ said. · are switcbfng to ~ed ~ter. The surge m water recycling has I · · been propelled by improvements in technology, regulatory changes and a new crap of government subsidies for reclamation systems. Today, Califqrnia uses more than 450,000 acre-feet of reclaimed wa. ter annually. That is equal to about one-and-a-half Castaic Lakes. or the water consumed bv two.thirds ,..! T.~~ ..\!'l'£'1{'~ iP. i1 •;t>,"r SU~ IM /\.t.11 .. -~·b~ ~ ~ ·---· . ....... . "' .... r ~·181=~~.· .. .l entsiwer imf=uWltieS~ ·. . ·imd in' the1Ue af Smr ~..-..9·TJietr:eDg1neen FranciscD, UIUA~dual'"'~·· •::.'if':....a • are taking on · · ~ .. can-_....,. acre-feet~tiii~-1 ·~..we of .. ~~ ·~ · ~--· ·.:ctm•'"tlonil· per~.·~ .· ......... _ .measure of~.-•. ~ .. ,. . .. . ·. · ·1n short, water see Wa&te water. m1-.·····~:ana -~.~ft.!t~e~~~· , ~.-.:. ,~~: • .... ti):t_Jfi". • ••••• : Once cbfeDY aJi • o{.~­ aewage, zeclaimed water is.~ over to the other side of tbe ledger." saldlaiGarda, ~Of environ• ment8l services 'for San Jose. whicll p1ans to divert nearr,· 4Q~· of its sewage stream to water supplies in cxm:dDg ye&rlL-. f)'·!:'t· ~ :" ···~~ :~'£ .. : ~ . . ,' . · · The West Basin Municipal Water DJstdct, which seives cmmmmities from West llollywood to Palos Vet· des &dates, bari made water· recy- cllng Qle ~ of its plan to cut 'dependence OD iiDparted water in half over the nm 3> years, largely by converting tJie regloil'if water-I hungry on refineries to· recycled · water~.··~. r _ :~·-~ii;:.~: ~ .. ;·j '~ Til ':'~~-. ~ .. ~~·.: .. :. ·.:-The purest of West Basin's recy-. C1ed water.is being injected into the pound· to profect drinking water · supplies from seeping seawater. The pJan will simultaneously cut seV!8P ·dischargeintothebay2li9':-:-·• ~ . San Diego leads the state. Officials . decided to convert waste into drink- ing water after court rulings forced the city to better treat its sewage to protect the ocean. The result is water similar to what most people would consider good for a swimming lake. Rather than dump that water back into the ocean, San Diego has designed a $150-million system to add another level of treaunent. bring the water up to the quality of extra-pure tap water, and pmnp it to the city's San Vicente drinking water reservoir. The water will be mixed into imported water supplies, comprising up to 10% of the supply by 2001. 11lt's a very significant step," said Ken Weinberg, water resources supervisor for the San Diego County Water Authority ... We are creating a new source of water." The technology for recycled wa- ter has developed to where San Diego's water will supposedly be 10 times purer than tap water, Gagliar- do said State health officials have already approved San Diego's plan. develop- tug a new set of guidelines for the purpose because none exist The water will be rme to drink, they say. The only worry is breakdowns in the system. so duplicate safeguards have been built in. Spath said. So far, U1c project has been more controversial because of its high cost than because of health concerns. San Diego officials estimate that it will cost about S600 per acre-foot to produce drinking water from waste water, about 30% higher than the cost of purchasing water from the Metropolitan Water District They acknowledge that figure is fuzzy, however, because it includes federal subsidies and is counted against current sewage treatment costs. ·And some San Diegans contend . that it would be better spent on developing other water solll'Ces: "If you are willing to spend that kind of money, you could fiood the city of , San Diego:• said Elmer Keen, a 1 retired geographer and critic of the : project I "It's a delicate balance," said 1 Steve Kasower, water· recycling specialist with the state Water Re-sources Board. "It's important the public understands this and doesn't get upset by fear-mongers .•.• · But, dirty or clean, water is just molecules of '1!?,0 with stuff floating between them. I Public acceptance for water recy-~ cling is not without precedent I n Northern Virginia. a sewage utility has been treating waste water \SO that it meets drinking water standards for 20 years and releasing it into the Occoquan Res- ervoir in an unusual project similar to what San Diego plans. No health problems have been reported. I At the mmt advanced sewage : treatment facilities today, utilities I empl:>y reverse osmosis and micro-mters. devices that involve pressing water through microsccpic mem- branes, similar to what is used at baWed water companies such as Arrowhead Water. Els~here in the 'state, environ- mental regulation has also spurred new efforts at reclamation. San Jose is-one example. The city is under pressure· to reduce the sewage it dumps into South . San Francisco Bay, not because the discharge is poisomng anything, but because it is so high quality that it is converting natural saltwater marshes into freshwater ones. "In effect, the water is too clean,'' said Steven Ritchie · of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commis- sion. But supporters counter that the : cost of recycled water. although ! expensive, is still far less than the . cost of desalinating water or build-· ing dams. "It's competitive in my book when compared to other new sources," said Peter MacLaggan, executive director of the Water Reuse Assn. of California. ' with bullrushes springing up in San Diego officials are keenly the bay where pickleweed aware of how easily public percep-once grew, and pressure mounting lion of the project could go awry. to do something to help endangered "This issue:· said one advocate. Dr. saltwater species, it was only a Rosemarie Marshall Johnson, "gets matter of time before cities like San everybody in a very personal way." Jose came to view their sewage as Please see WATER. A19 an enticing supply of freshwater WATER Continued from A18 The city conducted focus groups to test monikers for the water, and ultimately clime ,.repurified" over .. recycled," which. it seems, left too much to the imagination. Outreach to commlDlity groups came next, with officials gin- gerly pointing out that the city's existing water source. drawn from the Colorado River, contains sewage that has been treated and dis- charged by cities upriver, such as Las Vegas. Across the state, similar public relations efforts are underway, with water agencies gently seeking to tell the public that they are using a new source of water that's quite close to home. .. All water has gone through countless other organisms before it gets to us," said Hartling. "Dino- sams. fish, humans-some a lot I more recently than we would like to 1 think." I ·Ritchie said. ' San Jose now has a $140-million reclamation system under construc- tion that will deliver reclaimed wa- ter to parks, fanns and industries in Silicon Valley, said Garcia, the city's environmental services director. Some areas are even using re- claimed sewage water to upgrade the purity of their conventional water supplies. Monterey Regional Water Pollu- tion Control Agency will unveil a $'15-million project next month that will free farmers from dependence· on wells that have grown too salty Since statewide more than t.hr~­ quarters of urban water is used for things other than drinking, the most optimistic activists predict that someday 20%, or even 40%, would come from treated waste. "Toilet to tap" is the phrase that they use to denote a futuristic urban environment in which treated waste water would be transferred directly to drinklllg water pipes. Such a system would require new technology to instantaneously de- tect germs in treated water. But some reclamation enthusiasts still see it as inevitable. The very thought seems to make Spath. of the state health depart- ment, uncomfortable. "The time for that is not now, I will tell you that," he said. Even the strongest advocates sense that the quick tmnover of water from sewers to faw:ets may be a bit too dicey to win wide public acceptance. '1 forbid you to print this," said Orange County reclamation advo- cate and farmer Charles Peltzer, while expounding ideas for mixing reclaimed water into public drinking water. 1'The public isn't ready to hear it." Already, one water recycling plan has nm afoul of the public: Three years ago, the Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water Dmrict was forced to scale back a plan •to replenish ground water with recy- cled water because Miller Brewing Co. voiced fears that the project might taint its nearby wells. Other attempts to gauge public reaction have shown confilcting re- sults. A few years ago in Denver, water agency officials conducted focus groups to find out how the public might feel about ~ waste water for drinking. They found to their surprise that many people would rather not think too much about where their water comes from. ''They wanted us to just get on with it." said Jane F.arle, of Denver Water. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION SUBJECT J~ A ~td~ PAGE L.A. Mayor Steps Into Owens Valley, Long-Running Feud • Water: Protesters tum out for his arrival. The city of Los Angeles and air quality officials there remain at odds over how to proceed with the dry lake bed. By JIM NEWTON TIMES STAFF WRITER INDEPENDENCE, Calif.-Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan waded directly into his city's oldest, most passionate feud Wednesday, joining a group of local leaders on a trip to the Owens Valley, the farming community Riordan's predecessors stealthily bled dry of water a century ago so that they might build a modern city. So long and bitter has the dispute been that Riordan's appearance Wednesday marked the first ; time that a Los Angeles mayor has visited the Inyo County seat since the construction of the aqueduct· that formed the basis of the rifl That aqueduct was completed in 1913, forever transforming the city that got the water and the valley that lost il So determined has Los Angeles' effort been to dry the Owens Valley and bring the water south that dust clouds now pollute the air and frighten the residents who remain. The dust blows off what once was Owens Lake but now is a dry lake bed covering 110 square miles. The Los Angeles officials also got helicopter views of the vall~Y. . apd the major DWP projects in it, including the long, broad stretch of the dry lake bed, a desiccated reminder of the water that used to pool at the end of the Owens River. But the day was not just a social occasion or an aerial tour for the mayor. The city of Los Angeles and the air quality officials in Owens Valley remain at odds over how to proceed with the dry lake bed, and. Riordan used his visit to sound out his counterparts about the problem and recommendations for how to cure il So far, the two sides appear far apart. Air quality officials have proposed a variety of measures to knock down the dust in a 35-square-mile area of the lake. All told, those measures would require the city to give up i Please see WATER, A18 /)If ,Cli_ V VI-_ ' .-- i WATER: Protests Greet Riordan in Owens Valley Continued from A1 · 51,000 acre-feet of water annually, about one-seventh of Los Angeles' total draw from the Owens Valley. City officials are concerned that those estimates are based on ques- tionable research and have not agreed to the req1:1est.. · The proprietary quality of that besitattoµ is based on something more than just what the:law calls "water rights." · , At the aqueduct's christening, William Mulholland, the legendary· Department of Water and Power chief, turned to the mayor of Los Angeles as the water streamed down the canal and said: "There it is. Taite it." Los Angeles has taken that wa- ter ever since,. so it. was· not surprising that· ~iordan's welcome in the Owens Valley drew some testy reactions. Several dozen pro- testers gathered for his arrival, politely but impatiently awaiting the man wbose office represents the w-ter empire they detest. Some carried signs deriding "King Riordan." . '1've seen a lot of devastation, a lot," said 66-year-old Stan Matlick, who, like his father and grand- father before him, has fought the DWP. Like many who gathered '· Wednesday, he complained that holdings. Working with a few lo-the air. the water department's power in cals, the DWP secr~tly bought up Several residents said the dust is the valley is so all-encompassing it land and withdrew it from agricul-a serious health hazard. Ann Capo- has made residents feel as if they t~al production. . . danno, who has lived in the valley live in a colony of Los Angeles. . When residents caught on, the: for more than 30 years, complained ·1 don't like these people," Ma-battle·was joined. It unfolded over of sinus problems. Vernon Rea, a tlick said of the DWP. "I don't like decades, peaking in extraordinary . five-year resident, said he has their tactics." bursts of intensity and violence. · · start~d gettjng ·summer colds. Oth- The crowd chanted and waved There was the Owens ·valley ers expressed alarm at studies signs as the van carrying Riordan lawman who shook down the Los showing ar~enic and cadmium in approached. But the mayor de-Angeles city clerk buying up land the dust. fleeted the group's anger. Moments · ·and water rights. There was the In fact, Rea carried a sign ad- . after arriving, he crossed under a near-lynching of one man who ·dressed to the mayor: !'King Rior- barricade erected to keep the dem-worked behind the scenes for the dan. Add a little arsenic and cad- pnstrators out of a private bar-city of Los Angeles: And in 1924, JDlum to that barbecue sauce to get becue party. He took a few ques-there was the series of dynamite authentic Owens Lake taste." tions, got a short lecture from one blasta 'that ripped holes in the Spying the sign, Riordan yelled · man ·and ~greed with the demon-aqueduct carrying water from the ·to the crowd: ''What I want to strators that. it was important to valley to the city and that launched know iS who promoted me to 11work out a solution to some of the· . an insurrection among valley resi-king?'~ · many legitimate gripes that people · dents. . · The visit by· the mayor was have here." . That particular chapter ended largely social. Along with City · Joking with one protester, a oiµy after an armed confrontation Council President John Ferraro, reUred DWP worker; Riordan said: was narrowly averted. · council members Ruth Galanter "J've got bad news for you. Your Throughout, Los Angel~ lead-· and Cindy Miscikowski and oth~r pension program is being looked ers have remained steadfast-Mui-. Los Angeles officials, the mayor al" . , holland for". the ·rest of his life· hobnobbed with Owens Valley dig- The roots of this struggle' date to referred to Owens Vall~y r~sidents nitaries at the Eastern California 1904, when Los Angeles leaders-·as "dynami~ers." The city lead~r~ Museum, where he snook hands on Mulholland's advice-began have never wavered from their . and made small talk with. local eyeing the Owens Valley as a · insistence that the· water is more . sui)ervisors, air quality officials, water source for the city and badly need~ for Los ~geles resi-. 1 81\d others. particularly the San Fernando Val-·dents than valley farmers. ; ,...· ----!'.---~----- ley, where some of those leaders · When the wind blows up the - ow~ed considerable real est~te .. valley, as it was doing Wednesday afternoon, particles sometimes kick up off the lake bed and ·c1oud ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS SUBJECT NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE DATE ~(7-'L/1'7 .. fYlJ:;tJy .. xaJ~~ ~ Using Water Reclaiit;ted FrOm Sewage aRe .. ReclaimedWasteWaterMay allows; raises the possibility of· Ease State's Thirst," Aug. 17: · involuntary exposure to barinful I was portrayed as one of the bacteria or other pathogens. Add-. "crusaders" for increased use of Ing reclaimed sewage water to our recycled water and as making .. the aquifers and reservoirs without point by gulping down a· long, cool stifficient, fail-safe· treatment and glass of tertiary effluent" While continual monitoring for viruses the point is exactly correct, the puts our scarce water supplies and imagery is misleading. I would gulp our health at aJJ. unacceptable risk. down tertiary effluent to demon-The addition of significant strate my confidence in its safety-amounts of recycled waste water to if pressed to do so. However, I also our fresh water supplies results in would point out that tertiary efflu.. elevated levels of total dissolved ent is not quite at the quality level solids. Such salty or hard water ·for everyday drinking purposes. may increase one's plumbing repair Water recycling agencies .-outtnely · costs ~d necessitate the ·use of alert the public not to drink from · larger amounts of detergents. Wa- sources of recycled water. ter with high salt content may also· It is possible and· economically adversely affect one's health and feasible to bring the water up to a garden. Segregating reclaimed potable level of quality with addl-sewage water from fresh or potable tlonal treatment-as correctly supplies with a double-piping sys- pointed out in the article. That tem, while costly, is the better way elixir I would gulp down in a long, to go. cool glass at the drop of the pro-· ELLEN STERN HARRIS verbial hat. · Fund for the Environment . BAHMAN SHEIKH PhD, PE Beverly Hills San Francisco : • It's fantastic that water agencies technology work well I. think they are toO concerned · . that the public is not ready for this. Eighty percent of the complaints will come from 20% of the people. rd bet the other 80% of us have the common. sense to see that reclahned or .. repurified" water is.~ . good·thlng. . .. JOHN DELANEY Aliso Viejo • The use of reclaimed sewage are making this important water for industrial applications · J. and for irrigating golf courses, freeway landscapes and appropri- ate crops is certainly to be com- mended. However, using inade- qua~ely tr~ated and poorly momtored recycled·waste water for . potable purposes is quite another· matter. · .. Placing such water in air condl- tio~g sys~. as California now Sure~~ • Three things are for sure: death, taxes and no mean- ingful campaign finance reform. KEN JOHNSON Pinon Hills .· .·· .. j I .. , , .. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE L-A /fl t~Al S Bl Water Importation: Tide to Keep Rising • Public works: Job growth, development to raise over all demand 30% by 2020, Orange County Water District projects. Rate increases likely. By SHELBY GRAD TIMES STAFF WRITER Orange County's reliance on expensive imported water is ex- -pected to increase significantly over the next 20 years, raising the prospect of higher bills for con- sumers and prompting officials to seek new sources of less-costly local ground water. Job growth and new residential developments across the county should increase overall water de- mand by 30% by 2020, according to new estimates by the Orange County Water District. But because local water sup- plies are limited, the district pre- dicts that use of imported water from the Colorado River, North- ern California and elsewhere will jump by at least 37% over the same period. These projections trouble some officials, who note that imported water costs twice as much as tapping local supplies and is a less dependable a source. "It goes beyond cost to a ques- tion of reliability," said Wes Ban- nister, president of the Orange County Water District "If we had a major earthquake that shuts the California Aqueduct down for six months or had a major drought, what would we do?" Most of the cities in northern and central Orange County get 50%. to 70% of their water from the ground and import the rest But South County has far less ground water and thus must rely more heavily on importation. Local water agencies hope to reduce their reliance on imported water by drilling dozens of new wells, at a cost of more than $30 million. They are also consid- ering much more expensive plans to build a new water reclamation plant and make a variety of improvements to the county's waterworks. All this comes at the height of a bitter water war between San Diego County and the Metropoli- tan Water District, which sup- plies Southern California-and Orange County-with much of its imported water. ··1~ San Diego wants to.reouce its reliance on the MWD by pur- chasii:tg water from Imperial County. MWD opposes the plan, saying that if San Diego buys less from the MWD, and consequently begins paying less of the pumping and other transmission costs, it will result in higher water rates for other MWD customers in Southern California, including those in Orange County. · Pleue see WATER, B6 DATE SUBJECT a--zs ~tti V{CLIC-Y--_ C\-Sr" po<Z..:, T toYL- 86 R MO!'filAY. AUGUS.1.'.25, 1997 ORANG Photce by KEVIN P. CASEY I Loe Angde11 'limes A reflection is cast in treated waste water during a clarification proc- ess at an Orange County Water District plant in Fountain Valley. WATER Continued from Bl , The MWD is also under pressure from the federal government to reduce the amount of water it takes from the Colorado-River, a devel- opment that might reduce the amount of water available to Orange County. . ''We are looking for _any oppor- tunities we can to increase our use of local ground water," said Ronald E. Young, general manager of the Irvine Ranch Water District, which is drilling ~ new wells this year . alone. "By its nature, ground water is very reliable. It's tbere in times of drought." The projected surge in demand ·over the next 20 years· comes after water use in Orange County actu- . ally dropped by nearly 10% earlier in the decade. Officials attributed. the dip to the drought and eco- nomic recession of the ear1y·1990s. But since 1993, water use is up 16%, and the Orange County Wa- ter District predicts a further 30% increase by 2020 because of new . growth. . To meet the rising demand, . northern and central county water agencies plan to increase ground .. water production from 70% of capacity today to 75% by 2020. The . effort will require more than two dozen new wells, and experts still aren't sure if the goal can be met. ~'It's still a q1:1estton whether we . can pump that much water out of the basin,'' said William R. Mills Jr., general manager of the~· · County Water District.· "Our 'first· .1 indications are that this is doabie. But we will have to wait and see." · Even with the cost's of the new: wt'lls and other improvements, Mills said ground water pumping will still cost far less than importa- tion or other options, such as desalinization of ocean water. In 2000, the Orange County Wa- ter District estimates that an acre- foot of ground water will cost $182, compared with at least $468 for imported water and. more .than · $1,200 for desalinized water. An acre-foot is 324,000 gallons, enough to supply the needs of two families for a year. · Officials also hope · to bolster local water supplies by building a new reclamation facility that would treat waste water. Some of the recycled· water would be pumped into the Santa Ana River as part of a recharging process designed to increase the county's ground water supply as river water filters down through the riverbed and holding ponds into the aquifer. The (ll'St phase of this reclamation project would cost about $240 mil- lion. The Orange Cow:ity Water Dis- trict has not yet come up with estimates of how water rates will change over the next 20 years. But officials have expressed concerns about a proposal by the MWD that would increase water charps to areas like Orange County t.hit are experiencing growth in. water d.e- mand .' ... · · · Acc0rding· io an Orange County Water District report, the cost of imported water from the MWD could rise as much as 35%. The MWD would use the extra revenue to pay for infrastructure improve- ments needed to accommodate re-gional growth. .But MWD officials insist that they haven't decided how to apply so-called "new demand charges'' and that customers prob~bly won't · see sharp increases in their water bills. '1 don't think you will see that : kind of impact on waie.-rates," said Brian Thomas, . assistant · chief of planning and resources for the MWD. "Our 10-year forecast ·shows that rates should remain ; pretty flal" . Thomas, however, said that. Orange County residents might ·take a modest ·hit if San Diego . County is successful in receiving water from Imperial County and reduces the amount it pays to the MWD . . . Average monthly residential water bills range from less than $14 in .Irvine and Garden Grove to more than $35 in some South County communities such as· Lagiina Beach and Trabuco Can- yon, according to a 1~ survey by Black & Veatch. Anaheim's average monthly wa- ter bill is $21.87, while Santa An~'s is $18.23. By contrast, Los Angeles ·bills average $24.69 a month, Riverside $10.90 and San l)iego $24.49. The p~h to reduce reliance on imported water ·is also driven by more than concem about cost. Huntington Beach's water de- partment ls just completing a $43-· million waterworks upgrade that : adds three wells and millions of ·gallons of extra reservoir capacity. Linda Daily, a senior analyst with· the city, said the additional reser- ; voir should give the city a decent I supply of watei: in case wells and : pipes are damaged during an : earthquake. . · "We could have a situation in which we will have to live with what is within our reach," she said ~. ti -\ i -9. ~ ;? ,c:; ii c L') $ z ry ~1 G: I ~ ITi -~ Zc-; me lj~c CD (,/J Z -o~ '3::· I)> -< lJ= c "'O (J; "l t S:l ~ ("')= ,. <:::. -)> ~ -0 _, \\ ..,., --uo ~ Zz \v G)Ci "\) \ en Ci5 -i g'' ~ s: () a _, en ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE LA fl /rJ e.!J I> 3 Water Panel Won't .Go With the Flow · • Government: Tri-cities district has been deemed unneeded, but its board opposes a proposal to dissolve it By DAVID REYES TIMES STAFF WRITER SAN CLEMENTE-The sentl- .. ment was widespread: A small wa- ter district in South County with overlapping jurisdiction had be- come impractical. It was deemed an unnecessary layer of government. So the grand jury recommended consolidating the Trt-aues Mu- nicipal Water District with another agency. "Ninety-nine percent of their customers want them to go away," said James Holloway, San Cle- mente community development di- rector. "Their own in-house com- mittee recommended · consolldatiqn, and Ute city and [neighboring) Coastal· Municipal Water Dlstri:ct want them to go away." Although perhaps harsh. the an- .ti-government attitude was spawned in the aftermath of Orange County's bankruptcy, a •A consolldatlon Is maybe you eliminate one or two boards by forming only . one district. Dlssolutlon Is doing away with the district entirely and giving the alsets away. My objection Is that when you dissolve the district, $35 million In assets and $2.5 mllllon In relerves go to the city of San Clemente.' JAMES LAWSON . Member of the Tri-Cities Municipal water DJstl'lct Ume when a series of recommen- dations targeted the county's mul· tllayered special districts handling everything from sanitatlon to· li· braries. The grand jury urged stream· lining to make government more efficient. In an era of rapidly rising water rates. consumers are paying too much for water, partly because of government inefficiency, the county panel found. Tri-QUes, which operates on a S13-million annual budget, owns a pipeline and serves about '10.000 customers as an intermedi- ary in the county's water-delivery system. It wholesales water to local districts and the· city of San Clemente, which has its own water department. . The agency only has abOut. three field employees and it hires outside cansultants for management, pub- llc relations and accounting. . So what is happening to Tri-Cit· ies? The county's Local Agency Formation Commission voted Aug. 5 to dissolve the :n ~year-old water agency, but Tri-Cities board mem- bers have vowed to fight. "It's much more politics than anything," said James Lawson. a retired UC Irvine director of archi· tecture and c:onstruct.Jon. and 11· year member of the Tri-Cities board. .• . Lawson wants Tri-Qties to ap- . peal LAFCO's decision and, if the appeal fails, me a lawsuit aiming to put the issue before voters. "You know, the recommenda- tions made for Tri-Cities were to consolidate, not dissolve," Lawson said. "A consolidation is maybe you elimihate one or two boards by · forming only one district. DlBsolu- tion is doing away with the district. entirely and giving the assets away. My objection is that when you disso!ve the district, $35 mil- lion in assets and $2.5 million in reserves go to the city of San Clemente." DATE 8/~(;/1? Dana M. Smith. LAFCO's s- ecutiVe officer, who bas had experience With mergers, consoli- datlons and dissolving districts, said such procedures are never easy. "It's so hard. And when the bell is rung, usually it's the directors who don't want to go away, and that's what you have here,'' Smith said. '-rhere is no other overlap- ping district ln Orange County... • • • Their own clients med the request far them to. be dissolved." In recommending dissolution to LAFCO commissioners, Smith cited cost reductions of $363,700 to $476.200 should the agency be operated by San Clemente. Lawson said Tri-Citles' oppomtion isn't a matter of board members feeding their egos but of anger that assets from the regional agency must be turned over to a city. In addition, Tri-Citles counters Smith's cost-saving figures with an esUmate that taxpayers would save only about $15,000. (In her r~­ mendatlon, Smith did note that a loss of $266,000 in property tax revenue from Tri-Cities customers in San Diego County would reduce overall savings.) The Tri-Citles service area in- cludes the San. Onofre Nuclear Generatlng Statton and state parks in north San Diego County. While LAFCO has approved the dissolution of Tri-Citles and designated San Clemente as the successor agency, lt will be at least 60 days before the issue is taken up by the Orange County Board of Supervisors, Smith said. ''We're eliminatlng a layer of government that is unnecessary and there are substantlal cost sav- ings that wW accrue to taxpayers," Smith said. "San Clemente will take over its responsibility because it's bigger and can handle the additlonal load." As for Lawson, he fears that San Clemente may use Tri-Citles' re- serves to help the cash-strapped municipality and not far water projects as intended. But the city's Holloway said that by law, the money must go into a special fund and cannot be used for the general budgeL · "I want it to go to an electlon," Lawson said, "because as far as I'm concerned, that will put their feet to the fire and show everyone how they divide up the assets." SUBJECT Ju.(lt,,~,