HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-08-27phone:
(714) 962-2411
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley. CA
92728-8127
str eet address:
10844 Blis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA
92708-7018
Member
Agencies •
Cit ies
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Park
Cypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Huntington Beach
Irvine
La Habra
La Palma
Los Alamitos
Newport Beach
Orange
Placentia
Santa Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tustin
Villa Park
Yorba Linda
County of Orange
Sanitary Districts
Costa Mesa
Garden Grove
Midway City
Water Districts
Irvine Ranch
COU NTY SAN ITATION DISTRI CT S OF ORANG E COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
August20, 1997
NOTICE OF MEETING
JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1997 -7:30 P.M.
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will
be held at the above location, time and date.
Tentatively -Scheduled Upcoming Meetings
OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND
TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
PLANNING, DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
RATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
WORKSHOP
JOINT ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL
WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT
COORDINATION COMMITTEE
STEERING COMMITTEE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
WORKSHOP
-Wednesday, September 3, 1997, at 5:30 p.m.
-Thursday, September 4, 1997, at 5:30 p.m.
-Wednesday, September 10, 1997, at5:30 p.m.
-Thursday, September 11 , 1997, at 5:30 p.m.
-Tuesday, September 23, 1997, at 5:30 p.m.
to be held at CSDOC (Tentative)
-Wednesday, September 24, 1997 at 5:30 p.m.
-Thursday, September 25, 1997, at 9:00 a.m.
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954
JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES
Month Jojnt Board Meeting
September September 24, 1997
October October 22, 1997
November November 19, 1997
December December 17, 1997
January January 28, 1998
February February 28, 1998
March March 25, 1998
April April 22, 1998
May May 27, 1998
June June 24, 1998
July July 29, 1998
August August26, 1998
September September 23, 1998
AGENDA
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 27, 1997 -7:30 P.M .
In accordance with the requi~ents of California Govemmeri Code S~ction 54954.2, this agenda h~J~i<-1 ! been po.sted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the.J~i i
meetit)Q date and time ab All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for publi l
inspection in the office of oard Secretary. @,
~ . ~~~ .
In the event any m~r not listed on this agenda Is proposedfto be submitted to the Boards for discu
and/or action, it wj · · do • compliance with Section 54 ,(b} as an emergency item, or that there
,, is ~ ne~o t!kft · · .. n Wtiis!l~eed ~·to .·· ' ~i~ Distnssubseq · ~-'
posting oMhe a forth on a supple~otal a , ~"oot less 1tlan 72 hou
the meeti'ng date. qi "'*: @.
... ~····.:
1. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
2. Roll Call
3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to
appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
4. Appointment of Chair pro tern, if necessary
5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters
of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be
deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot
have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b).
08127197
Page 2 of 7
6. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous
matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no
action by the Directors.
a. Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and
awards
b. Report of General Manager
c. Report of General Counsel
7. EACH DISTRICT
If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as
mailed and be so ordered by the Chair:
District 1 July 30, 1997
District 2 July 30, 1997
District 3 July 30, 1997
District 5 July 30, 1997
District 6 July 30, 1997
District 7 July 30, 1997
District 11 July 30, 1997
District 13 July 30, 1997
District 14 July 30, 1997
8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each
Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District
represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.)
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving fund
Joint Working Capital Fund
Self-Funded Insurance Funds
District No. 1
District No. 2
District No. 3
District No. 5
District No. 6
District No. 7
District No. 11
District No. 13
District No. 14
Districts Nos. 3 & 11
Districts Nos. 5 & 6
Districts Nos. 6 & 7
Districts Nos. 7 & 14
TOTALS
06/11/97
$867,353.30
2,434, 124.01
195,794.42
24,032.97
253.80
76,719.29
33,118.42
2,671.68
1,323.93
3,885.38
5,088.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,327.43
1,904.83
3,856.22
3.654.453.98
06/25/97
$776,271 .71
446,441.28
517,886.00
27,919.24
9,818.18
31,687.15
293,950.90
8,255.07
6 ,195.81
10,206.57
77,066.10
239.52
1,869.92
0.00
473.56
216.49
828.58
2.209,326.08
07/09/97
$2,377,316.20
3,603,262.09
399,088.05
7,203.44
357.40
15,400.40
15,987,51
4,790.81
148.20
14,444.05
113,705.87
0.00
0.00
25,790.00
5,387.92
1,901.67
4,381.99
6.589,165.60
CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM NO. 9
08127197
Page 3of7
Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
DISTRICT NO. 7
9. REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE: The Engineering Department
requests approval of an agreement that provides reimbursement by District No. 7 to the County of
Orange, Public Facilities and Resources Department, for the cost of adjusting approximately
12 existing District No. 7 manholes within several County of Orange streets in unincorporated
areas in District 7 in conjunction with the County's "Resurfacing Program 1996-97".
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a reimbursement agreement with the County of Orange
authorizing District No. 7 to deposit the sum of $2,340.00 with the County of Orange as the
estimated cost for adjustment of approximately twelve District No. 7 manholes in several County
of Orange streets.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
1 O. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.
11 .
12.
08127197 ~
Page 4of7
NON-CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re August 27, 1997 meeting.
b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES -NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information
only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on
July 30, 1997 to be filed.
a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re
August 7, 1997 meeting.
b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES -NO
ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design
and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 7, 1997 to be filed.
c. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS. J-34-1 AND P2-35-5 WITH ADVANCO
CONSTRUCTORS, INC. FOR OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND
PHASE II SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS: The Construction Manager and
Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing for six items of
added work. (PDC97-38)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. -2 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5
with Advance Constructors, Inc. for an addition of $50,415, increasing the total contract
amount to $7, 168,938.
d. ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORK (All Districts): The Joint
Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of selection of Black and Veatch for
preliminary engineering and environmental work in support of the Orange County
Reclamation (OCR) Project. (PDC97-40)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve selection of Black and Veatch to provide Preliminary
Engineering and Environmental Work for the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed
$449,500 as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 29, 1997.
The Districts' share is $224,750 or fifty percent of the total fee of $449,500 in accordance
with the Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation
Project, dated February 26, 1997.
08127197
Page 5of7
ALL DISTRICTS -(Continued from page 4)
12.
13.
e.
a.
ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR
PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating
Committee requests approval of a Task Order with Adler Public Affairs for public
information services in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project.
(PDC97-41)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve selection of Adler Public Affairs to provide public
information services in support of the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $99, 796,
as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 22, 1997. The Districts'
share is $49,598, or fifty percent of the total fee of $99,796, in accordance with the
Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project,
dated February 26, 1997.
Verbal Report by Chair of Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan August 13, 1997 meeting.
b. AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATETIC PLAN MINUTES-NO ACTION REQU IRED
(Information only): The Chair will order the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan Minutes
for the meetings held on March 25, June 18 and August 13, 1997 to be filed.
14. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1997 (All Districts)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July
1997.
15. JOB NO. J-31-3, PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE (All Districts):
The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to add
instrumentation and equipment to automate processes at the Plant No. 1 Headworks, and provide
additional capability to monitor process information from a remote location.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2) Waive
bid irregularities as to form; and 3) Authorize award of a contract for Job No. J-31-3, Plant 1
Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, to Systems Integrated, to add instrumentation and
equipment to automate processes at the Plant No. 1 Headworks, in a total amount of $694,000.
16. JOB NO. P2-46-2, RECLAIMED WATER EXTENSION TO HEADWORKS "C" AT PLANT NO. 2
(All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to
extend the reclaimed water piping to Headworks "C" for improved reliability of water supply for the
main sewage pumps.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and
2) Authorize award of a contract for Job No. P2-46-2, Reclaimed Water Extension to Headworks
"C" at Plant No. 2, to Atlas Allied, Inc., extending reclaimed water piping to Headworks "C", in a
total amount of $139,680.
17. DISTRICT 3
08127197
Page 6of7
CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3, IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM,
REACH 3: The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to
Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. to replace a portion and increase the capacity of the
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System in Imperial Highway between Beach and Harbor Boulevards in
the City of La Habra.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2) Approve
Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the plans and specifications; and 3) Authorize award of a contract to
Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System,
Contract No. 3-38-3 in the total amount of $4,587,000.00.
18. DISTRICTS 7 & 14
ACCOMMODATION OF FLOWS AND TRANSFER OF CONNECTION FEES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD) AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NOS. 7 AND 14: The Engineering Department requests approval of an agreement that provides
for the accommodation of flows from two small drainage areas in District No. 7 which are
currently served by District No. 14 through IRWD. Under this agreement District No. 7 will
transfer to District 14 connection fees previously collected by the City of Newport Beach on behalf
of District No. 7.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve Accommodation of Flows and Transfer of Connection
Fees Agreement with IRWD and Districts Nos. 7 and 14.
19. ALL DISTRICTS
a. Convene in closed session, if necessary
08127197
Page 7 of 7
19. ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6)
a. 1. Confer with Districts' Management and General Counsel re appeals of termination
of employees from investigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1), (2)).
2. Confer with Special Counsel re status of litigation, Louis Sangermano v. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No.
732680 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)).
3. Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Larry and Donna Anderson v.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case
No. 773598 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)).
b. Reconvene in regular session
c. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session
20. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting
21 . Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report
22. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
23. Adjournments
NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: T OJ>lace item~· pn the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards,
Directors shall subrn{t items:tdt,the Board~~~C,retary no later th~g*the close of busi11f.1: 14 days .
preced'ingdhe Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary sha • elude on the ageilfl<i all items
submitt y DirectOJ'S. the General Manager and General C I and all formal "COmmunications.
tary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-241 1t ext. 2026
H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\A.G97\A.UG97\082797.doc
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AMENDED MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
JULY 30, 1997
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended
07/30/97
Page 2of11
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Diredors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on July 30, 1997, at 7:30 p.m., in
the Distrids' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll
was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT x Pat McGuigan, Chair Thomas E. Lutz
N0.1 x James M. Ferryman, Chair oro tern Arthur Perry x Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz x Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts
x Todd Soitzer William G. Steiner
DISTRICT x Norman Z. Eckenrode. Chair Michael L. Maertzweiler -
N0.2 x Mark A. Murphy, Chair pro tern Joanne Coontz x Steve Anderson John Holmbera
x John Collins James Petrikin x Barry Denes Bob Bell x Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff x Mark Leyes Bruce A. Broadwater x Pat McGuiaan Thomas E. Lutz x Chris Norby Don Bankhead
-x Todd Soitzer William G. Steiner x HankWedaa Mark Schwing x Bob Zemel Tom Daly
DISTRICT x Maraie L. Rice. Chair James V. Evans
NO. 3 x Eva Miner-Bradford, Chair pro tern Paul F. Walker x Steve Anderson John Holmberg x Georae Brown Gwen Forsythe x Tom Carroll Marv Ann Jones
Brian Donahue x Harry M. Dotson x Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff x Mark Leyes Bruce A. Broadwater
A Patsv Marshall Jack Mauller x Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz x Chris Norby Don Bankhead x Todd Soitzer William G. Steiner x Dave Sullivan Tom Harman x Charles E. Sylvia Alice B. Jempsa x Bob Zemel Tom Daly
DISTRICT x Jan Debay, Chair John E. Naves
N0.5 x John E. Noyes, Chair pro tern Jan Debay
William G. Steiner x Todd Spitzer
DISTRICT x James M. Fenvman. Chair Arthur Perry
NO. 6 William G. Steiner. Chair pro tern x Todd Spitzer x Jan Debay Tom W. Thomson
.....
-
• I(
-Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended
07/30/97
Page 3of11
ACTIVE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT x Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair
NO. 7 Christina Shea, Chair pro tem x Jan Debay x James M. Ferryman x Pat McGuigan x Mark A. Murphy
William G. Steiner
DISTRICT Shirley Dettloff, Chair
N0.11 x Dave Sullivan, Chair pro tern x Todd Spitzer
DISTRICT x Burnie Dunlap, Chair
N0.13 x Mark Schwing, Chair pro tern x Mark A. Murphy
William G. Steiner x Bob Zemel
DISTRICT Christina Shea, Chair
N0.14 x Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair pro tern x Mark A. Murphy
William G. Steiner x Peer A. Swan
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
Jim Potts x Barry Hammond
Tom W. Thomson
Arthur Perry
Thomas E. Lutz
Joanne Coontz x Todd Spitzer
x Tom Hannan
Tom Hannan
William G. Steiner
Marty Simonoff
HankWedaa
Joanne Coontz x Todd Spitzer
Tom Daly
x Barry Hammond
Jim Potts
Joanne Coontz x Todd Spitzer
Darryl Miller
Don F. Mcintyre, General Manager; Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager of
Operations; Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager of Administration; Penny Kyle, Board
Secretary; Nick Arhontes; Jeff Armstrong; Barbara Collins; Mark Esquer; Ingrid Hellebrand;
Brian Keating; Steve Kozak; John Linder; David A. Ludwin; Mike Moore; Mike Peterman;
Suzanne Smith; Gary Streed; Moira Sullivan; Mitch Trivanovich; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy
Wheatley; Chuck Winsor; Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT:
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel; Art Perry, Alternate Director; Denis Bilodeaux; Don
Jamison
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR
The Joint Chair reported that Governor Wilson had signed the Districts' consolidation
bill, AB769. Staff was preparing the application to LAFCO and the Executive
Committee would be meeting on September 17th to discuss the filing and the next steps
to be taken.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended
07/30/97
Page 4of11
Chair Collins also referred to a fax sent to all Directors announcing that Judy Wilson has
accepted a position with the Los Angeles Department of Public Works as Director of
Sanitation, subject to confirmation by the city council.
It was then announced that only the Planning, Design and Construction Committee
would be meeting on August 7. All other committees would be dark. In addition there
would be a Directors' workshop on Saturday, August 2, focusing on the Districts' ocean
discharge permit.
The Joint Chair directed attention to the booth set up in the back of the room, which was
the set up for a 17-day run at the Orange County Fair. Michelle Tuchman, Director of
Communications, spoke briefly about the fair and introduced key staff that was in
charge of the project.
ADOPT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING EMPLOYEE CAii Districts): The
Joint Chair requested that Resolution No. 97-30 be adopted expressing appreciation to Judith A.
Wilson for her contribution and dedication to public service upon her retirement from the
Districts. The resolution was then presented to Ms. Wilson.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts)
There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 25,
1997, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director Todd Spitzer abstained.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS CAii Districts)
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims
set forth on exhibits "A", "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and
summarized below. ·
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended
07/30/97
Page 5of11
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
Joint Working Capital Fund
Self-Funded Insurance Funds
DISTRICT NO. 1
DISTRICT NO. 2
DISTRICT NO. 3
DISTRICT NO. 5
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICT NO. 13
DISTRICT NO. 14
DISTRICTS NO. 5 & 6
DISTRICTS NO. 6 & 7
DISTRICTS NO. 7 & 14
5/14/97
$ 394,580.99
3,286,351.21
138,089.17
0.00
225.00
2,n2.5o
11,137.42
27.15
0.00
800.95
5,219.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$3 839 204.01
Directors Mark Leyes and Todd Spitzer abstained.
DISTRICT NO. 2
05/28/97
$ 386,016.11
355,312.70
580,675.28
93,582.37
10,076.48
35,027.51
547,342.87
13,382.87
3,455.71
10,531.54
6,477.24
421.94
438.43
498.40
216.49
17.18
$2 043472 53
MISC.
$50,669.43
58,364.94
17,688.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,670.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$128 392.94
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE PETITION RECEIVED FROM
PHILLIP AND BARBARA JOUJON-ROCHE TO ANNEX .608 ACRES OF TERRITORY TO THE
DISTRICTS IN THE VICINITY OF SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD AND MOHLER DRIVE IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AND AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF ANNEXATION OF SAID
TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT. <PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 78 JOUJON-ROCHE
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2).
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to adopt Resolution No. 97-29-2, initiating proceedings
for Annexation No. 78 -Joujon-Roche Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2.
DRAFT STEERING COMMITIEE MINUTES CAii Districts): Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of
Steering Committee presented A verbal report, re the July 30, 1997 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held-on July 25,
1997 to be filed.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended
07/30/97
Page 6of11
DRAFT OPERATIONS. MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES CAii Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting,
summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
Minutes for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed.
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS. INC. FOR
PRIVATE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DISTRICTS' OXYGEN GENERATION
SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2: The Operations-Maintenance Department requests consideration
from the Board of Directors to amend several terms and conditions of the original agreement for
an estimated cost savings of $215,000 for each year of the remaining seven (7) years of the
fifteen-year contract.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Authorize the General Manager to execute an
amendment to the original agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the private
operation and maintenance of the Districts' oxygen generation system at Plant No. 2, approved
as to form by the Districts' Contracts/Purchasing Manager.
DRAFT PLANNING. DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES CAii
Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Planning,
Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting, summarizing the
actions taken and referring to the draft min~tes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee
Minutes for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1 WITH COUCH BROS .. INC. OBA
COUCH & SONS. FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS (Districts 3 and 11 ): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering
request approval of Change Order No. 6 providing thirteen items of additional work and granting
a time extension of 101 calendar days for completion of the additional work.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Change Order No. 6 to Contract No. 11-
17-1 with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons for an addition of $92,305.00 and 101 calendar
days, increasing the total contract amount to.$6,005,724.03.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended
07/30/97
Page 7of11
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO JOB NOS. P1-41. P1-43. P1-44. P2-48. P2-50. P2-53-2.
SP19950021 AND SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR REHABILITATION
OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3. 4. AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1: SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON-
STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 1: SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 1:
REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS D THROUGH Q AT PLANT NO. 2: SEISMIC
RETROFIT OF NON-STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2: SEISMIC RETROFIT AT
PLANT -NO. 2: TUNNEL COVER REPLACEMENT AT BILLINGS TUNNEL AT PLANT NO. 2:
AND SLUDGE PIPING MODIFICATION AT PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS 6-15: The
Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 1
providing eleven items of added and deleted work and granting a time extension of 37 days for
completion of the added work.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P1-41, et
al. with Margate Construction, for a deduction of $85,680.00 decreasing the total contract
amount to $8,375,458.00, and an addition of 37 calendar days time extension.
ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP
DRESSER & MCKEE CCDM) FOR JOB NOS. J-40-1 AND J-40-2 RE PREPARATION OF
PHASE 1 OF STRATEGIC PLANS CALL DISTRICTS>: The Director of Engineering requests
approval of an Addendum to the PSA providing for additional work in three areas: (1) updating
trunk sewer system information contained in the Districts' CASSWORKS data base, (2)
development of pump station discharge curves, and (3) additional public, staff, and Board
meeting support.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the PSA with COM in
the amount of $199,489 for a total amount not to exceed $1,958,717.
Director Mark Leyes abstained.
DRAFT FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION. AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES
CAii Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance,
Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting, summarizing
the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee
Minutes for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed.
TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 30. 1997 CAii Districts)
A motion was made, seconded and carried to receive and file this information-only item.
· Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended
07/30/97
Page 8of11
ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND
DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF
FINANCE/TREASURER CAii Districts):
After discussion among the Directors, the motion was moved, seconded and carried to refer this
item back to the Finance~ Administration and Human Resources Committee for further study
and consideration, to be brought back before the Joint Boards in September; and to place a
moratorium on investing in reverse repurchase agreements until the Joint Boards vote to
approve the final policy on reverse repurchase agreements.
DECLARATION OF DISTRICTS' OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICTS'
EXISTING CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE IN
ADVANCE OF. AND IN ANTICIPATION OF. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES.
FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE INDEBTEDNESS ISSUE CAii Districts):
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Adopt Resolution No. 97-28, declaring Districts'
official intent to reimburse the Districts' existing capital reserve funds for certain expenditures
made in advance of, and in anticipation of, capital improvement expenditures from proceeds of
a future indebtedness issue.
1997-98 FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE UPDATE AND SOFTWARE
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE DISTRICTS' FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SOFTWARE VENDOR. JD EDWARDS. IN THE AMOUNT OF $55.384.87 CAii Districts):
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Approve the 1997-98 financial information software
update and software maintenance agreement with the Districts' financial information software
vendor, JD Edwards, in the amount of $55,384.87.
Director Mark A. Murphy abstained.
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR PURCHASE OF COMPUTER
EQUIPMENT CAii Districts): GSA staff requests approval of offering a computer
financial assistance program to employees.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Approve a computer financial assistance program to
employees providing for a maximum loan of $3,000; 10% down payment; 24 months repayment
period; interest rate at 5%; and aggregate maximum loan fund of $150,000.00.
Director Mark A. Murphy abstained.
AUTHORIZE STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH R.W. BECK TO DEVELOP
ASSUMPTIONS AND STRATEGIES TO IMPLEMENT A REPLACEMENT FUND FOR FIXED
ASSETS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75.000 CAii Districts>:
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: That the Directors authorize staff to negotiate an
agreement with R.W. Beck to develop assumptions and strategies to implement a Replacement
Fund for fixed assets for an amount not to exceed $75,000.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended
07/30/97
Page 9of11
ANNUAL ELECTION OF JOINT CHAIR
The Joint Chair announced that this was the annual meeting at which election of the Joint Chair
of the Joint Administrative Organization is to be held. The Secretary stated that Diredor John
Collins had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 25, 1997, in
accordance with established procedures.
There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled and the Secretary the unanimous
ballot for Director John Collins as Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization.
ANNUAL ELECTION OF VICE JOINT CHAIR
This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards of Diredors for the election of the Vice Joint
Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Joint chair then called for nominations-for the
post, whereupon Director Peer A. Swan was nominated.
There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary cast the
unanimous ballot for Director Peer A. Swan as the Vice Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative
Organization.
DISTRICTS 7 & 14
ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE
ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION.
CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1. AND ABANDONMENT OF NINE DISTRICT NO. 7 PUMP STATIONS.
CONTRACT NO. 7-14 (Districts 7 & 14) :
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: The Director of Engineering requests approval of
Addendum No. 4 to the PSA providing for additional work for construction contract support
services during the construction of Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract
No. 7-7-1.
Director Todd Spitzer abstained.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended
07/30/97
Page 10of11
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS. P1-41. P1-43, P1-44. P2-48, P2-50. P2-53-2.
P19950021 and SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR PAYMENT OF
CONSTRUCTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH FACILITIES TO PERMIT DISCHARGE OF
EXCESS RECLAIMED WATER TO THE DISTRICTS' OCEAN OUTFALL SYSTEM TO BE
FUNDED BY DISTRICT 5 (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests approval of
Change Order No. 2 for construction costs for an increased amount not to exceed ~197,299.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to execute Change
Order No. 2 for Job Nos. P1-41, P1-53, P1-44, P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021 and
SP19950059 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the Green Acres
Project distribution system and the Districts' ocean outfall system for an amount not to exceed
$197,299, to be funded by District 5; and,
DISTRICT 5: Moved, seconded and carried to approve District 5 funding of Change Order
No. 2 for Job No. P2-48 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the
Green Acres Project distribution system and the Sanitation Districts' ocean outfall system at a
cost not to exceed $197,299.
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE (District Nos. 5 and 6): Receive and file
Summons and Complaint for negligence, David P. Gatliff v. Wal-Con Construction Company,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 779933, in connection with Replacement of Pacific
Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1) Find that the matter arose subsequent to the
posting of the agenda pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); 2)
Receive and file Summons and Complaint; and 3) Authorize Districts' General Counsel to
appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTIONS 54956.9 AND 54957.6 (All Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at
9:12 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(a) and 54957.6(a). Confidential
Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in
accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board
Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
No action was taken re Agenda Item No. 18(a)(5).
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 9:31 p.m., the Boards reconvened in
regular session.
APPROVE MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SUPERVISOR AND PROFESSIONAL
EMPLOYEE UNIT RE SALARIES. BENEFITS AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT (All Districts):
Authorize the General Manager to sign the Memoranda of Understanding with the Supervisor
and Professional Employee Unit re salaries, benefits and terms of employment for the period of
July 4, 1997 to June 30, 1998.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting -Amended
07/30/97
Page 11 of 11
ADJOURNMENTS CAii Districts>: The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 9:32 p.m.
(j of Directors of
ist cts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
\\lead\data2\wp.dta\admln\BS\MIN97\073097.doc
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE 1
,,
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
158819 A & G INDUSTRIES $1,805.22 STRAINER PROBES
158820 AT & T • MEGACOM SERVICE $3,013.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
158821 AT & T ·CELLULAR CR & R $1.47 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
158822 AWSI $30.00 D.O.T. TRAINING PROGRAM
158823 ABRASIVE ENG. TOOLING & EQUIP. $154.24 HARDWARE
158824 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES $420.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
158825 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. $417,891.60 CONSTRUCTION J-34-1, P2-35-5
158826 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $139.25 AIRFREIGHT
158827 ALADDIN HOUSE $604.56 WINDOW BLINDS
158828 ALCO PRODUCTS INC $267.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
158829 ALLOSEP $431.81 FILTERS
158830 ALPHA RESEARCH GROUP $14,430.00 ON-SITE TRAINING DEVELOPMENT
158831 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
158832 AMERICAN DIGITALTECHNOLOGIES $1,200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
158833 AMERICAN INST OF GRAPHIC ARTS $245.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
158834 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $257.33 PUBLICATION
158835 APCO VALVE & PRIMER CORP. $346.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
~ 158836 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4,841.70 NOTICES & ADS
158837 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
158838 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
...... 158839 AWARDS & TROPHIES $172.69 PLAQUES
rt 158840 BAR TECH TELECOM, INC. $200.00 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION
~ 158841 BARNEBY-SUTCLIFFE CORP. $136.96 FILTERS
~ 158842 BARNES & NOBEL BOOKS $23.27 PUBLICATION
158843 BATTERY SPECIAL TIES $7,500.21 BATTERIES
158844 BLACK & VEATCH $3,221.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-46
158845 BLACK BOX CORP $4,557.87 FIBER OPTIC CONVERTER
158846 BOOT BARN $96.87 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
158847 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $11,770.12 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18
158848 ROBERT B. BRESKIN $2,232.50 PERMIT FEE REFUND
158849 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $61.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
158850 CS COMPANY $712.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
158851 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $1,164.49 LAB SUPPLIES
158852 CALIFORNIA AUTO REFRIGERATION $357.20 REPAIR KITS
158853 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION, INC. $1,469.01 TRUCK BODY REPAIR
158854 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $120.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
158855 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $679.00 MOVING SERVICES
158856 CAMALI CORP. $1,200.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
158857 CANUS CORPORATION $37,298.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
158858 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $49,486.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95
158859 SUSAN W. CASE $165.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
158860 CATAPULT INC. $2,720.00 ON-SITE TRAINING
158861 MARK CASTILLO $3,038.97 EXPENSE REIMB.
158862 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $17,328.79 INSPECTION SERVICES
158863 CLEAN SOURCE $651.35 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
158864 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $8,328.70 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
158865 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2,007.38 PUMP PARTS
158866 COMPUTERS AMERICA $219.70 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
158867 COMPUSERVE $821.03 COMPUTER SERVICES
158868 CONDENSER & CHILLER SERVICE $1,275.00 SERVICE ANALYSIS
158869 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $116.31 TRUCK PARTS
158870 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL $8,309.60 ELECTRIC PARTS
158871 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,057.15 ENGINE PARTS
158872 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $74.60 TRUCK PARTS
158873 COUNTY CLERK $228.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
158874 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $3,065.67 ELECTRIC PARTS
158875 CHARLES P. CROWLEY, CO. $785.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS
158876 DELL MARKETING L. P. $46,595.42 COMPUTERS
158877 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $380.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS
158878 DIAMOND H RECOGNITION $270.15 SERVICE AWARDS
158879 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $3,596.00 INSPECTION SERVICES
158880 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $1,065.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
158881 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $105.16 PAINT SUPPLIES
~ 158882 EMA SERVICES INC $3,100.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
158883 ESP INDUSTRIES, INC. $130.86 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
158884 EATON CORP/CUTLER HAMMER $3,942.71 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
...... 158885 ELECT AIR $360.11 PNEUMATIC CYLINDERS rt 158886 ENCHANTER, INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95 :r 158887 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,181.55 LAB SERVICES
N 158888 JIM EVANS $2,597.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
158889 FAIRBANKS SCALES INC $3,885.83 SERVICE AGREEMENT
158890 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $380.36 FRAMES
158891 FIBERTRON $198.63 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
158892 BAILEY FISCHER & PORTER CO. $267.39 FILTERS
158893 FLICKINGER CO $239.66 VALVES
158894 FLORIDA CONVEYOR & EQUIP $11,714.71 POLY-ROLLER ASSY.
158895 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $256.02 PAINT SUPPLIES
158896 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $89.47 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES
158897 GCS SERVICE, INC. $137.13 TIMER
158898 GCOE $99.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
158899 GST, INC. $14,735.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES
158900 GTE COMMUNICATONS (FLOOR 3) $164,342.54 PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADES
158901 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,115.21 LUMBER/HARDWARE
158902 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $5,660.92 CHEMICALS
158903 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $952.50 REPAIR SCRUBBER TOWERS
158904 . GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,175.66 , TELEPHONE SERVICES
158905 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $92.00 PUBLICATION
158906 GRASBY S.T.I. $530.48 ENGINE PARTS
158907 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO., INC. $6,751.90 ELECTRICAL PARTS
158908 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $111.54 PRINTING
158909 DGA CONSULTANTS $950.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94
158910 HACH COMPANY $3,319.04 LAB SUPPLIES
•)
• FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
158911 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $2,484.19 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
158912 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $6,254.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
158913 PL HAWN CO, INC. $314.88 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
158914 LINDA HOLMES $2,312.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
158915 HOME DEPOT $63.46 SMALL HARDWARE
158916 HRDIRECT $123.34 LABOR LAW POSTERS
158917 RS HUGHES CO, INC. $87.77 PAINT SUPPLIES
158918 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,341.73 WATER USE
158919 IC ENGINE & EQUIP SERVICE $2,159.99 GENERATOR PARTS
158920 IPCOSAFETY $922.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES
158921 ISCO, INC. $49.39 INSTRUMENT
158922 IMAGING PLUS $594.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES
158923 IMAGING AND RECORDS MGMNT $200.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
158924 INORGANIC VENTURES $139.00 LAB SUPPLIES
158925 IAML $1,675.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
158926 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $677.15 BATIERIES
158927 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $2.90 WATER USE
~ 158928 JAMISON ENGINEERING $22,642.65 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
158929 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $2.412.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
158930 JAY'S CATERING $440.69 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE ...... 158931 JENSEN TOOLS, INC. $226.28 OFFICE EQUIPMENT rt" 158932 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $100.00 TRUCK REPAIRS :r 158933 JOHNSTO~E SUPPLY $301.46 ELECTRIC PARTS w 158934 TERRI JOSWAY $250.00 TRAINING EXPENSES
158935 KEENAN SUPPLY $590.21 WELDING SUPPLIES
158936 KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. $25,454.82 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95
158937 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $441.21 MACHINE SUPPLIES
158938 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $897.75 TOOLS
158939 VLADIMIR KOGAN $342.58 EXPENSE REIMB.
158940 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,618.73 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
158941 LAOUG (LA ORACLE USER GROUP) $495.00 MEMBERSHIP
158942 MDT $936.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
158943 MACOMCO $455.55 SERVICE AGREEMENT
158944 MANDIC MOTORS $44.00 TOWING SERVICES
158945 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $1,406,500.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2
158946 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $490,980.23 CONSTRUCTION P1-41, P1-43
158947 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $68,018.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-40-2(REBID), P2-47-2(REBID)
158948 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $82.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
158949 MATI -CHLOR, INC. $201.86 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES
158950 MC INFO $10,460.67 COMPUTER HARDWARE
158951 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $120.88 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB.
158952 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $173.08 HEATER
158953 MELLON TRUST $15,227.10 INVESTMENT CUSTODIAN BANK
158954 MESA MUFFLER $137.75 TRUCK PARTS
158955 MICRON SPEARATION INC $58.34 LAB SUPPLIES
158956 MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING $2,732.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
158957 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,744.44 UNIFORM RENTALS
158958 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $3,020.06 CONST INSP TRAILER LEASE
158959 MORTON SALT AND/OR $1,405.47 SALT
158960 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. $442.15 PUMP PARTS
158961 NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S $69.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
158962 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP $451.28 TRAINING VIDEO'S
158963 NETWORK CATALYST, INC $9,417.27 COMPUTER HARDWARE
158964 NICKEY PETROLEUM CO., INC. $3,637.64 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
158965 SY NIELSON SERVICE INC $50.00 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION
158966 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $103.00 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE
158967 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,954.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES
158968 OMNI WESTERN INC $410.85 TOOLS
158969 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $185.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
158970 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,063.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
158971 ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. $1,007.56 FITTINGS
158972 OXYGEN SERVICE $3,980.20 SPECIAL TY GASES
158973 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,685.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
~ 158974 COUNTY OF ORANGE $280.00 PLAN CHECK FEES
158975 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $431.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
158976 PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. $2,554.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS
~· 158977 PACIFIC BELL $18.05 TELEPHONE SERVICES rt 158978 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $2,417.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES :r 158979 PASCAL & LUDWIG ENGINEERS $21,794.00 CONSTRUCTION J-33-2
~ 158980 PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC. $63,617.20 CONSTRUCTION P1-38-2
158981 CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY $500.81 REIMB. PETTY CASH
158982 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC. $83,986.48 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 3-29-95
158983 US FILTER I POL YMETRICS INC $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
158984 POL YPURE, INC. $26,771.02 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
158985 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
158986 PRYOR RESOURCES, INC. $158.95 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
158987 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $88.83 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
158988 HIPOTRONICS, INC. $59.59 FREIGHT CHARGE
158989 RJN GROUP, INC. $2,249.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
158990 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $3,533.93 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
158991 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $329.34 TRASH REMOVAL
158992 RAND MATERIALS HANDLING $142.80 FREIGHT CHARGE
158993 RD SYSTEMS INC $222.03 CAMERA REPAIR
158994 REAL TIME $3,044.40 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES
158995 RED WING SHOES $151.71 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
158996 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $334.03 I VALVE
158997 REMEDY TEMP $10,297.82 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
158998 REVCO I LINDBERG $233.67 DISPLAY PANEL
158999 GEORGE ROBERTSON $834.94 EXPENSE REIMB.
159000 MARCY ROTHENBERG $1,695.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159001 RUTAN & TUCKER $10,296.00 LEGAL SERVICES
159002 SCOTT SPECIAL TY GASES, INC. $1,449.03 SPECIAL TY GASES
4j .....
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159003 SEWER EQUIP CO OF FLORIDA $7,141.51 HOSE
159004 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,705.58 TOOLS
159005 SHURELUCK SALES $608.62 TOOLS/HARDWARE
159006 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,337.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94
159007 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $30.00 PERMIT FEES
159008 SO. CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $880.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
159009 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. $103.63 WATER USE
159010 SUCCESSORIES $520.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
159011 SUNSET FORD $189.11 TRUCK PARTS
159012 SUPELCO, INC. $1,032.89 LAB SUPPLIES
159013 SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $15,250.00 CONSTRUCTION
159014 SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $432,604.15 CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, P2-55
159015 SYMCAS, INC. $142.50 CONSULTING SERVICES
159016 TEKTRONIX, INC. $247.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159017 THERMO SEPERATION PRODUCTS $446.66 LAB SUPPLIES
159018 THERMO JARRELL ASH CORP $503.39 TRAINING PACKAGE
159019 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $10,986.32 MECHANICAL PARTS
~ 159020 TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE $330.59 LOCKS&KEYS
159021 EDWARD M. TORRES $300.55 EXPENSE REIMB.
b= 159022 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $3,139.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS ..... 159023 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $722.90 TRUCK PARTS rt 159024 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $698.64 TRUCK PARTS :r 159025 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,811.00 LAB SERVICES
U1 159026 JG TUCKER & SON, INC. $1,503.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159027 MICHELLE TUCHMAN $110.52 EXPENSE REIMB.
159028 TULE RANCH/MAGAN FARMS $38,620.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL
159029 DANIEL TUNNICLIFF $250.00 EXPENSE REIMB.
159030 TUSTIN DODGE $45.32 TRUCK PARTS
159031 UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $656.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159032 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $110.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE
159033 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,208.50 LAB SUPPLIES
159034 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,873.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159035 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $79.48 VALVE
159036 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC. $1,993.37 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
159037 VERNE'S PLUMBING $632.30 PLUMBING SERVICES
159038 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $1,672.77 FIBER OPTICS
159039 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,138.56 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
159040 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $220.00 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
159041 WAXIE $136.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159042 WEF $500.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
159043 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $22,768.99 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
159044 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $57.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
159045 WESTSIDE BLDG MATERIAL CORP $340.15 TOOLS
159046 XEROX CORP. $10,148.73 COPIER LEASES
159047 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $455.96 LAB SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 $3,839,204.01
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
SUMMARY
#1 OPERFUND
#20PERFUND
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#30PERFUND
#3 CAP FAC FUND
#50PERFUND
#70PERFfJND
#11 OPER FUND
#11 CAP FAC FUND
JTOPERFUND
CORF
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
$225.00
$422.50
$2,350.00
$10,187.42
$950.00
$27.15
$800.95
$2,382.63
$2,836.99
$394,580.99
$3,286,351.21
$138,089.17
$3,839,204.01
PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
.. ,
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159070 AGX CORPORATION $424.06 GAUGE
159071 ABRASI~ ENG. TOOLING & EQUIP. $722.52 HARDWARE
159072 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $3,235.60 I LAB SUPPLIES
159073 AIR COLD SUPPLY, INC. $99.36 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS
159074 ALLIED PACKING & RUBBER INC $652.50 GASKETS
159075 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
159076 AMERICAN CRANE INSTITUTE $825.00 CRANE & MANLIFT TRAINING
159077 AMERICAN Dl~ITAL TECHNOLOGIES $6,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159078 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $1,245.00 PUBLICATION
159079 AMER SOC FOR QUALITY CONTROL $351.50 PUBLICATIONS
159080 AMETEK $78.33 CIRCUIT BOARD REPAIR
159081 LLOYD ANDERSON $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159082 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES $1,233.39 MACHINE SUPPLIES
159083 ARMOR-VAC $1,146.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
159084 ASAP SOFlWARE EXPRESS $24,413.12 SOFlWAREUPGRADES
~ 159085 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH, INC. $260.78 FILTER
159086 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159087 CYMANTHA ATKINSON $18.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
I-'· 159088 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO .$214.42 AUTO SHOP SUPPLIES rt 159089 AVIS CONTRACTOR LICENSE SVC CE $2,085.00 EXAM PREPARATION
tp 159090 BAYSHORE PSYCHOLOGY CENTER $125.00 SEMINAR FEE
..... 159091 BECWAR ENGINEERING $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159092 BELL PIPE & SUPPLY CO $502.22 VALVE PARTS
159093 BLACK BOX CORP $157.89 MODEM REPAIR
159094 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $5,259.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1 & P2-48
159095 BRENNER-FIEDLER & ASSOC., INC. 1330.32 GENERATORS
159096 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. 244.84 INSTRUMENT
159097 BUSH & ASSOCIATES, INC. $1,424.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94
159098 CPI -THE ALTERNATIVE $755.32 LAB SUPPLIES
159099 CS COMPANY $1,516.35 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159100 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $203.65 LAB SUPPLIES
159101 CAL TROL, INC. $3,109.62 HARDWARE
159102 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $435.54 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159103 CALOL YMPIC GLOVE & SAFETY $3,119.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES
159104 CAMALI CORP. $1,300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159105 CAMP DRESSER & MC KEE INC $15,938.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
159106 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $4,403.12 OFFICE FURNITURE
159107 CENTURY PAINT $121.93 PAINT SUPPLIES
159108 CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY $50.00 PUBLICATION
159109 CLEAN SOURCE $450.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159110 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159111 COLE SCIENTIFIC, INC. $20.10 LAB SERVICES
159112 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $293.84 LAB SUPPLIES
159113 COLOR ARTS INC $1,749.75 VEHICLE DECALS
159114 COMMUNITY ACTION\ EAP $950.00 DISTRICT EAP -MAY 97
159115 COMPUTERS AMERICA $1,741.94 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122197 PAGE2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05128/97 POSTING DATE 05128/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159116 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $485.52 ELECTRIC PARTS
159117 CONSUMER PIPE $4,397.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159118 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $7,702.97 CONSUL TING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93
159119 DOUG COOK $140.30 EXPENSE REIMB.
159120 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $307.24 ENGINE PARTS
159121 CORPORATE EXPRESS $175.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159122 CUMMINS-ALLISON CORP $981.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
159123 CA DEPT OF HEAL TH SERVICES $3,119.00 MEMBERSHIP
159124 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $20,126.00 1ST QUARTER UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
159125 DCC/CAL INC $137.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159126 CHRISTOPHER DAHL $817.37 EXPENSE REIMB.
159127 DATA CLEAN CORP $2,910.00 EARTHQUAKE PROOFING
159128 JIM DAVIDSON $392.34 EXPENSE REIMB.
159129 TOM DAWES $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159130 DAYS INN HOTEL $545.80 HOTEL RESERVATIONS
~ 159131 DELL MARKETING L. P. $13,210.15 COMPUTERS
159132 DEL TA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $34,449.24 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94
159133 DEL TA INTERNET SERVICES, INC. $100.00 DOMAIN SET-UP FEE ..... 159134 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,583.99 OFFICE EQUIPMENT rt 159135 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $515.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES
tD 159136 PIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $3,480.00 INSPECTION SERVICES ... , rv 159137 ~OBERT DUMITY $713.76 EXPENSE REIMB.
159138 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,001.25 PAINT SUPPLIES
159139 ESP INDUSTRIES, INC. $456.06 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
159140 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $150.65 TRUCK PARTS
159141 J.D. EDWARDS s29,1n.3o SOFlWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7-24-96
159142 EL-COM HARDWARE $81.62 FAN
159143 ELECTRA-BOND, INC. $1,621.64 REPAIR
159144 KENNETH J EMANUELS & ASSOC $16,500.00 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATE SERVICES
159145 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $900.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
159146 ENCHANTER, INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95
159147 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,030.35 LAB SERVICES
159148 JIM EVANS $4,519.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159149 EXCALIBUR ENTERPRISES $95.97 VIDEO CAMERA ADAPTER
159150 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $486.33 AIRFREIGHT
159151 FIBERTRON $2,754.23 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
159152 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $733.30 FILTERS
159153 FIRST CHOICE $1,236.56 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
159154 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $4,729.43 LAB SUPPLIES
159155 FLO-SYSTEMS $531.10 PUMP PARTS
159156 FORD TRUCK PARTS $431.00 TRUCK PARTS
159157 FORMA SCIENTIFIC, INC. $10,108.81 LAB EQUIPMENT
159158 FORKERT ENGINEERING & SURVEY $570.83 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 6-8-94
159159 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $146.91 PHOTO SUPPLIES
159160 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,806.83 PAINT SUPPLIES
159161 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $338.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES
~
ca\ •
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159162 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $144.28 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES
159163 GKK CORPORATION $498.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159164 GST, INC. $7,941.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159165 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE $110.00 PERMIT FEE
159166 GARTNER GROUP, INC. $1,185.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS
159167 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $166.34 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
159168 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,544.58 TELEPHONE SERVICES
159169 N. GLANTZ & SON INC. $207.72 TOOLS
159170 GOV'T FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $88.00 PUBLICATIONS
159171 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $930.70 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
159172 GRASSY S.T.I. $505.24 ENGINE PARTS
159173 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $2,680.65 PRINTING
159174 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,692.91 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94
159175 HACH COMPANY $51.92 LAB SUPPLIES
159176 HAESTAD METHODS $295.00 SOFlWARE
~ 159177 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,868.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159178 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW $85.00 SUBSCRIPTION
159179 Pl HAWN CO, INC. $16.97 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
~· 159180 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $4,151.50 CONSUL TING SERVICES rt-159181 HIGHLANDER LAUNDROMAT $179.19 PERMIT FEE REFUND
tD 159182 Jill Tl, INC. $530.13 TOOLS I w 159183 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF., INC. $187.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS
159184 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $335.75 LAB SUPPLIES
159185 HUNSAKER & ASSOC IRVINE, INC. $600.59 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159186 JOHN HUNT $5,420.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-44-3
159187 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $780.00 WATER USE
159188 IPCOSAFETY $27,159.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES
159189 IMAGING PLUS $227.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159190 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFGS $2,462.82 FILTERS
159191 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $207.05 CONNECTORS
159192 INORGANIC VENTURES $244.81 LAB SUPPLIES
159193 INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED MGMT $1,575.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
159194 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $926.05 BATTERIES
159195 INTERSTATE ENGINEERING $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159196 ISCO, INC. $792.61 INSTRUMENT
159197 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $310.32 PRINTING
159198 JAMISON ENGINEERING $5,910.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
159199 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,286.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159200 JAY'S CATERING $735.22 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE
159201 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $172.64 GAUGE
159202 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,732.05 ELECTRIC PARTS
159203 KAISER PERMANENTE $43,223.37 INSURANCE PREMIUM
159204 DIONNE KARDOS $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159205 KELAR CORPORATION $2,880.00 CONSUL TING SERVICES
159206 KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. $86,174.01 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95
159207 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4,285.33 TOOLS
I '
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05128/97 POSTING DA TE 05/28197
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159208 DUSTIN LE $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159209 DAVID A LUDWIN $153.00 EXPENSE REIMB.
159210 MPS $686.11 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
159211 ~COMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159212 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOC $70.00 MEMBERSHIP
159213 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,507.69 WELDING SUPPLIES
159214 MANTEK $321.99 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
159215 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $662.83 VALVE PARTS
159216 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $22.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
159217 MIKE MCCARTHY $399.52 EXPENSE REIMB.
159218 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $69.32 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB.
159219 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $1,794.21 TOOLS
159220 CHARLES MCRANEY $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159221 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $2,940.94 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
159222 METRA HEAL TH $114,457.98 INSURANCE PREMIUMS
~ 159223 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $5,668.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
159224 MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING $11,431.51 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
~ 159225 PORTIA MINA $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
I-'· 159226 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $344.80 OFFICE TRAILER LEASE
rt 159227 MONTGOMERY WATSON $6,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 2-26-97
tp 159228 MICHAEL D. MOORE $1,181.50 EXPENSE REIMB.
.i:::. 159229 MOTEL SIX #34 $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159230 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC $1,137.68 ELECTRICAL PARTS
159231 MOTOROLA, INC. $893.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159232 SAM MOWBRAY $188.47 EXPENSE REIMB.
159233 NADINE'S LAUNDRY $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159234 NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHOPS $139.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
159235 NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS $5,233.10 ELECTRICAL PARTS
159236 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $758.14 EXTERIOR METAL LETTERS
159237 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $9,217.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159238 NETWORK CATALYST, INC $62,916.30 COMPUTER HARDWARE
159239 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE
159240 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE $26,658.68 SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE
159241 NWLAND/OR $12,986.21 LIFE INSURANCE
159242 01 CORPORATION $181.02 LAB SUPPLIES
159243 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $386.93 SAFETY GLASSES
159244 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $3,047.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159245 OMEGA CORPORATION $153,145.35 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
159246 OMNI WESTERN INC $235.62 TOOLS
159247 ORACLE CORPORATION $1,600.00 SOFTWARE
159248 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $187.68 PUMP PARTS
159249 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $4,074.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
159250 COUNTY OF ORANGE $23,473.58 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
159251 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $41,942.97 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
159252 COUNTY OF ORANGE $66.00 PERMIT FEE
159253 PSI $646.50 HARDWARE
Cl '"'/
<>\ ..
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122197 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05128/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159254 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $122,470.00 INVESTMENT MGMT. SERVICE RES 95-75
159255 PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. $602.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159256 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. $1,379.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
159257 PACIFIC BELL $1,275.50 TELEPHONE SERVICES
159258 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $1,611.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159259 PAGENET $589.43 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
159260 PAINE WEBBER $60,848.44 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT
159261 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $447.31 AIR REGULATOR
159262 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159263 PARTS UNLIMITED $831.15 TRUCK PARTS
159264 PERMASEAL $5,087.94 LUBE OIL
159265 CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY $2,099.66 REIMB. PETTY CASH
159266 JERRI Pl $46.65 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159267 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,025.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
159268 MIKE PRLICH & SONS $518,068.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-35R-1
~ 159269 RM CONTROLS $50.72 PLOTTER PENS
159270 R & R INSTRUMENTS $549.70 ELECTRIC PARTS
159271 REAL TIME $255.00 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES
..... 159272 THE REGISTER $200.00 NOTICES & ADS
rt 159273 t.AWRENCE ROOD $79.26 DEDUCTION REIMB.
tp 159274 SAVANT $2,017.60 LAB SUPPLIES
U1 159275 R. CRAIG SCOTT & ASSOC. $22,164.30 LEGAL SERVICES -PERSONNEL ISSUES
159276 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,215.42 LAB SUPPLIES
159277 SEARS $486.79 TOOLS
159278 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO $1,016.69 REFRIGERATOR
159279 SECOND-SUN $281.39 OFFICE FURNITURE
159280 SERPENTIX CORPORATION $6,558.58 NYLON ROLLER ASSEMBLY
159281 STUART SEVERN $893.66 EXPENSE REIMB.
159282 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,603.56 TOOLS
159283 SHURELUCK SALES $2,267.81 TOOLS/HARDWARE
159284 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $130.00 PROBE
159285 SMITH-EMERY CO. $5,402.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94
159286 SNAP ON I SUN CORP $608.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
159287 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1,315.84 TOOLS
159288 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO $46,030.36 POWER
159289 SO CALIF EDISON CO $30,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15-95
159290 SO. CAL. GAS. CO. $20,328.71 NATURAL GAS
159291 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,084.94 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
159292 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO., INC. $250.00 METER
159293 SPRINT $32.70 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
159294 SRECO FLEXIBLE $175.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
159295 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $539.67 LAB SUPPLIES
159296 STRATEGIC FRAMEWORKS, INC. $12,180.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159297 SUNSET FORD $771.18 TRUCK PARTS
159298 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $143.55 HOSE
159299 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $24.43 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122/97 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159300 SYMCAS, INC. $878.75 CONSUL TING SERVICES
159301 T J SAUSAGE KITCHEN INC $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159302 TEL-A-TRAIN INC. $6,529.50 TRAINING VIDEO TAPES
159303 TELEDYNE $1.248.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159304 TEST EQUITY, INC. $1,947.72 POWER SUPPLY
159305 THOMAS BROS MAPS $210.00 PRINTING
159306 TERRY THROOP $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159307 TORNELL & COTTEN $2,219.00 LEGAL FEES
159308 TOXGAURD SYSTEMS, INC. $1,995.00 REPAIR STORAGE TANK MONITORS
159309 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $173.41 TRUCK PARTS
159310 TRUESDAIL LABS $992.00 LAB SERVICES
159311 JG TUCKER & SON, INC. $2,679.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159312 UNIRULE INDUSTRIES $28.94 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159313 UNISOURCE&IOR BUTLER PAPER $93.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159314 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $331.07 PARCEL SERVICES
~ 159315 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE
159316 UNOCAL CORPORATION $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159317 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $213.00 LAB SUPPLIES
~· 159318 U S POSTAL SERVICE $5,000.00 POSTAGE rt 159319 VWR SCIENTIFIC $865.68 LAB SUPPLIES tp 159320 TONY VALENZUELA $150.00 EXPENSE REIMB.
CJ'\ 159321 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $667.45 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159322 VERNE'S PLUMBING $880.22 PLUMBING SERVICES
159323 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $144.84 FIBER OPTICS
159324 VISION SERVICE PLAN -(CA) $7,644.00 VISION INSURANCE PREMIUM
159325 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $392.00 BUILDING REPAIRS
159326 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,130.56 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
159327 WATERS CORPORATION $5,415.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159328 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY $1,905.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159329 WEKA PUBLISHING, INC. $145.50 PUBLICATION
159330 WELLS SUPPLY CO. $1,171.02 VALVES
159331 WEMAC DIV OF PURITAN-BENNETT $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159332 WESTERN BUSINESS SYSTEMS $938.29 PAYROLL CHECK STOCK
159333 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1,312.90 FILTERS
159334 NANCY WHEATLEY $1,207.00 EXPENSE REIMB.
159335 JUDITH A. WILSON $70.89 CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES REIMB.
159336 WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART $116,330.24 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95
159337 XEROX CORP. $9,527.70 COPIER LEASES
159338 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $567.88 LAB SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 $2,043,472.53
FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97
SUMMARY
#1 OPERFUND
#1 CONST FUND
#20PERFUND
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#2 CONST FUND
#30PERFUND
#3 CAP FAC FUND
#3 CONST FUND
#SOPER FUND
#5 CAP FAC FUND
#5 CONST FUND
#60PERFUND
#6 CONST FUND
#70PERFUND
#7 CAP FAC FUND
#7 CONST FUND
#11 OPER FUND
#11 CAP FAC FUND
#11 CONST FUND
#13 OPER FUND
#13 CAP FAC FUND
#14 CONST FUND
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND
#6&7 OPER FUND
#7&14 OPER FUND
JTOPERFUND
CORF
SELF·FUNDED INSURANCE FUND
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
$2,057.52
$8,018.96
$13,957.76
$600.59
$20,469.16
$9,021.35
$519,689.47
$18,632.05
$1,379.31
$7,702.97
$4,300.00
$1,272.33
$2,183.38
$3,866.43
$2,639.18
$4,025.93
$2,613.21
$1,158.70
$2,705.33
$347.41
$74.53
$438.43
$498.40
$216.49
$17.18
$386,016.11
$355,312.70
$93,582.37
$580,675.28
$2,043,472.53
PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO.
06112197 159659
06/19/97 159676
06/19/97 159677
06/24/97 159945
06/25/97 159946
06/25/97 159947
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID -MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS
VENDOR
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
NETWORK CATALYST, INC
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID
SUMMARY
#11 OPER FUND
JTOPERFUND
CORF
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
$17,410.87
$5,318.89
$47,020.74
$138.75
$138.75
$58,364.94
$128,392.94
AMOUNT
$1,670.20
$50,669.43
$58,364.94
$17,688.37
$128,392.94
PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE
POWER
POWER
BANKING SERVICES
BANKING SERVICES
SOFTWARE
I ,
•..
"Protecting the Public R l h .
ea t and Environment Through Excellence in Wastewater Systems"
N~~PIPELINE
fgro~ l
"3i/tflJ1f11 of )J/8 ~mf!"
So how does it feel to be
Operator of the Year for
Plant 1? Well, we asked
Doug Emery who was
recently presented with
this award. "It makes me
feel appreciated for
doing a good job."
The Operator of the
Year is chosen by the
entire Operations staff
including supervisors
and managers. They
have a first round of
votes to choose the
primary candidates and
then a final vote for the
winner.
"It is not a popularity
contest. There are
several attributes that
we look for in an
operator," says John
Finias, Chief Operator.
Attitude, job interest,
knowledge and quality
of work are a few of the
qualities that staff
consider. Other traits
include initiative,
New Reporting
Relatlonshlps Assigned
Assistant General
Manager for
Administration Judy
Wilson marked her last
day at the Districts on
Thursday, August 21 ,
exactly two years and
one day after joining the
Vol. 4 No. 6 August 22, 1997
dependability, and how quickly the employee learns new
procedures.
Doug began his career at the Districts in 1988 as a
Mechanic. After two years, he became a Plant Operator.
His role as operator contributes to the success of the
Districts in many ways. "Although I am only a small part
of the Operations and Maintenance Department, it is up
to me to make sure that wastewater coming through the
plant is treated according to industry standards .... every
time," says Doug.
Most of the work he does is routine but, on occasion,
the excitement can increase with a crisis such as the
one that occurred five months ago.
Doug was out on a second routine round just to make
sure that everything was running smoothly. There were
no signs that anything was wrong but, when he made
it to the basement of the thickener building, there was
sludge all over the floor and walls. He could not tell
off the top of his head where the problem was but he
knew he had to move fast. He called on the help of
his co-workers and within a few minutes realized that
a coupling had come undone which was causing a
powerful leak. Through careful maneuvering and with
the help of another mechanic, they were able to fasten
the coupling and avoid a major spill.
Doug, who is a first time award recipient, is proud to be
a part of such a dedicated team and is a very dedicated
employee himself. In fact, in the 9 years that Doug has
been at the Districts, he has never missed a day of work.
Congratulatlonsl In the next issue of Pipeline we will
spotlight Plant 2 Operator of the Year, Peter McGrath .
agency, to become the
Director of the Bureau of
Sanitation for the City of
Los Angeles.
Judy's accomplishments
belie her short tenure
here. She was
responsible for designing
and implementing a
performa nee-based
organizational structure
and for developing new
policies and procedures
to enhance the efficiency
of our administrative
functions.
She established our
Communications
Department and our
Training and Education
Division and worked with
Ed Hodges and Chris
please turn to page 3 ~ • • '
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Californi1
• • • '• . .
As part of the Bring Your Son to Work Day,
representatives from various areas of the plants told
our young guests about what they do at the Districts
and the training and experience required to do those
jobs. Some presentations were funny; others were
more serious in nature.
Mitch Trivanovich, Plant 2 Mechanical Maintenance,
wrote a poem. It was so popular, we decided to
oublish it in Pipeline. We hope you enjoy it as much
3S our guests and their parents did.
If gears don't turn
or gates won't close,
when pumps can't pump
'cause shafts are froze,
the bearing needs changi.ng,
the alignment needs set,
a bolt needs tightening,
there's one sure bet.
There's a fellow in blue
with certification
who's out in the field
with real dedication
to keep the plants running t
and never get mad l
and you should be proud ...
because he's your dad (or mom).
• • • II • •
lntergrated Emergencgy
Response Plan (IERP) Update
•
The Integrated Emergency Response Plan (IERP)
has been completed, all employees have received an
overview of the Districts' I ERP, and specific training
for the Districts' Incident Command System (ICS)
personnel has begun. Here's an update ... and a look
at what's next ... in our emergency-preparedness
efforts, according to Dan Tunnicliff of the Safety and
Emergency Response Division.
All Department Directors, Division Managers, and
IERP Review Team Members have received a copy
of the IERP. Until the IERP is available on-line,
please contact one of these individuals if you'd like
to see a copy of this two-volume document.
e Information on evacuation diagrams posted in buildings has
been updated to include assembly areas to report to during
an evacuation. The diagrams will also illuminate in the dark.
• Additional training courses for the Districts' ICS personnel
are under development.
• Functional exercises are being planned to test specific
components of the IERP. HAZMAT drills, evacuation drills,
and damage assessmenVsearch and rescue exercises are
under development. A HAZMAT Group drill will be conducted
during September. The skills and lessons learned from
functional exercises will be used in a Full-Scale Exercise
which will involve outside agencies, including the Fountain
Valley and Huntington Beach fire departments.
e The Safety and Emergency Response Division is working
with the Information Technology Division to provide the IERP
on-line.
If you have any questions or are interested in
becoming a member of the Districts' ICS Organization
please contact Dan Tunnicliff at extension 2143.
MEETING DATE: 08/27/97
DISTRICT 1
(LU12) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• MC GUIGAN •••••••••••••••••• _L
(PERRY/SCHAFER) •••••••••••• FERRYMAN •••••••••••••••••• _L
(COON12) ........................ MURPHY ••••••••••••••••••••••• _L__
(POTTS) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• SALTARELLI •••••••••••••••••• ~
(STEINER) ........................ &Pffl!R ....................... _v_
DISTRICT 2
(MAER12WEILER) ............. ECKENRODE .................. _L__
(COON12) •••••••••••••••••••••••• MURPHY ••••••••••••••••••••••• _L
(HOLMBERG) •••••••••••••••••••• ANDERSON ................... ...f'd:::::_
(PETRIKIN) ••••••••••••••••••••••• COLLINS ....................... ~
(BELL) ............................. DENES .......................... ..L
(SIMONOFF) ..................... DUNLAP ....................... _L._
(BROADWATER) ............... LEYES •••••••••••••••••••••••••• ,.L._
(LU12) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• MCGUIGAN ................... ~
(BANKHEAD) .................... NeR6¥-......................... v
(STEINER) ........................ ~ ....................... ~
(SCHWING) •••••••••••••••••••••• WEDAA ........................ ~
(DALY) ............................ ZEMEL •••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~
DISTRICT 3
· (EVANS) •••••••••••••••••••••••••• RICE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• _1L
(WALKER) ........................ MINER BRADFORD ......... ~
(HOLMBERG) .................... ANDERSON ................... ~
(FORSYTHE) ..................... BROWN •••••••••••••••••••••••• ..L_
(JONES) ........................... CARROLL ...................... _L_
(PETRIKIN) •••••••••.••••••••••••• COLLINS ....................... ~
(DOTSON) •••••••••••••••••••••••• DONAHUE •••••••••••••••••••••
(SIMONOFF) ..................... DUNLAP •••••••••••••••••••••••
(BROADWATER) ............... LEYES .......................... ~
(MAULLER) •••••••••••••••••••••• MARSHALL ................... ~
(LUTZ) ••.••••••••••••.••••••••••••• MCGUIGAN ••••••••••••••••••• ~
(BANKHEAD) •••••••••••••••••• '!':-NeRB'f"' ••••••••••••••••••••••••• _JL.
(STEINER) ........................ 'SPFF2ER' ....................... ~
(HARMAN) ••••••••••••••••••••••• SULLIVAN ..................... _L
(JEMPSA) ........................ SYLVIA ........................ _IL_
(DALY) ............................ ZEMEL .......................... L...
DISTRICTS
(NOYES) .......................... DEBAY ......................... _L
IDEBAY) .......................... NOYES ......................... ~
(SPl12ER) •••••••••••••••••••••••• STEINER ....................... ~
DISTRICTS
(PERRY/SCHAFER) ............ FERRYMAN ................... ~
(SPITZER) ........................ STEINER ...................... .
(THOMSON) ..................... DEBAY ....................... ..
DISTRICT 7
(POTTS) ........................... SALTARELLI .................. ~
(HAMMOND) ................... £ Stll?A ......................... ..
(THOMSON) ..................... DEBAY ....................... ..
(PERRY/SCHAFER) ............ FERRYMAN ................. ..
(LU12) ............................. MCGUIGAN ................. ..
(COONTZ) ........................ MURPHY ....................... ~
(SPITZER) ........................ STEINER ....................... _L
DISTRICT 11
(HARMAN) ....................... BE I TLOFF ..................... ~
(HARMAN) ....................... SULLIVAN •••••••••••••••••••••
(STEINER) ........................ Sfl IZEH ..................... ..
DISTRICT 13
(SIMONOFF) ..................... DUNLAP....................... $-
(WEDAA) ......................... SCHWING ................... ..
(SPITZER) ........................ STEINER ....................... ~
(COONTZ) ........................ MURPHY ...................... .
(DALY) ............................ ZEMEL ........................ ..
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
DISTRICT 14 · t (HAMMOND) .................... ~ •••••••••••••••••••••••
(POTTS) ........................... SALTARELLI.................. · :::=
{COONTZ) ........................ MURPHY....................... __
(SPITZER) ........................ STEINER ....................... .....J::!:./ __
(MILLER) .......................... SWAN .......................... _£ __
DISTRICTS: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
JOINT BOARDS
(HOLMBERG) .................... ANDERSON................... t"v
(FORSYTHEt ..................... BROWN ........................ ~
(JONES) ........................... CARROLL •••••••••••••••••••••• -V
CPETRIKINt ....................... COLLINS....................... v
(NOYES/THOMSON) •••••••••• DEBAY ......................... v
CBEW ............................. DENES .......................... ~
(HARMAN) ....................... e!1"Pl:8PP ..................... ~
(DOTSON) •••••••••••••••••••••••• DONAHUE..................... V
(SIMONOFF) ••••••••••••••••••••• DUNLAP ••••••••••••••••••••••• ..L....._
(MAERTZWEILER) ............. ECKENRODE •••••••••••••••••• ....i:::::_ __
(PERRY/SCHAFER) ............ FERRYMAN ................... ~ .L-___,_
(BROADWATER) ............... LEYES .......................... ~
(MAULLER) •••••••••••••••••••••• MARSHALL ••••••••••••••••••• _;L
(LUTZJ ............................. MC GUIGAN .................. ~
(WALKER) •••••••••••••••••••••••• MINOR BRADFORD ......... ...L
(COONTZ) ........................ MURPHY ....................... ..L
(BANKHEAD) .................... UOr\B: ; ........................ ~
(DEBAY) .......................... NOYES ......................... ~
{EVANS) •••••••••••••••••••••••••• RICE ............................. ~
(POTTS) ........................... SALTARELLI •••••••••••••••••• ~
(WEDAA) ......................... SCHWING ..................... __L
(HAMMOND) ................... ~ ......................... ...Ji:::::::.
STEINER) ......................... SPIRER ....................... -
(SPITZER) ........................ STEINER....................... >
(HARMAN) ....................... SULLIVAN .................... .
(MILLER) .......................... SWAN .......................... ~
(JEMPSA) ........................ SYLVIA ........................ /
(SCHWING) ...................... WEDAA ........................ v
(DALY) ............................ ZEMEL .......................... -;:::;>"
STAFF
ANDERSON ...................... _L
~~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::~
UNDER ........................... .
LUDWIN ......................... .
MCINlYRE ....................... ~
OOTEN ........................... .
PETERMAN ..................... .
smEED .......................... .
TUCHMAN ..................... ..
WHEATLEY ...................... :Z
WILSON .......................... .
OTHERS
WOODRUFF ..................... ..L.
ANDRUS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••
KNOPF ............................. --
LEE ................................. V
LINDSTROM .................... .
NIXON •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
SHAW ........................... ..
STONE ............................ ,/
H:\wp.dta\admln\BS\DIRECTOR\OLI02.doc
06/24/97
phone:
[714] 962-2411
mailing address:
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA
92728-8127
street address:
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA
92708-7018
Member
Agencies •
Cities
Anaheim
Brea
Buena Park
Cypress
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Huntington Beach
Irvine
La Habra
La Palma
Los Alamitos
Newport Beach
Orange
Placentia
Santa Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tustin
Villa Park
Yorba Linda
County of Orange
Sanitary Districts
Costa Mesa
Garden Grove
Midway City
Water Districts
Irvine Ranch
COUNTY SANITATION DI STRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
August21, 1997
To the Chairman and Members
of the Joint Boards of Directors
Subject: Board Letter
Penny Kyle (2 copies no label)
Board Secretary
The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional
information on any of the items, please call me.
40 Days and 40 Nights of Rain: The Sequel
As you just read, this winter is expected to bring record rainfall as a result of an El
Nino condition in the Pacific Ocean. We are preparing for the worst. Staff from
Engineering, Operations and Maintenance, and Emergency Response is meeting
regularly to develop a winter game plan. We will use our experience with previous
wet winters, a recently drafted report by our Strategic Plan consultant, the Districts'
Integrated Emergency Response Plan, and staffs most recent thinking to formulate
the Flood Contingency Plan. We will also begin an outreach program to the city
managers and city public work directors to limit the practice of opening sanitary sewer
manholes to relieve local street flooding. On the facilities readiness side of the
equation, we will have the standby 78-inch outfall back in service in mid-October after
having improved it with a taller and more earthquake resistant surge tower. This
improvement adds capacity and reliability to the standby outfall. Other minor
improvements within the treatment plants will give us additional short-term storage,
which will allow us to decrease peak flow rates, if necessary. We'll let you know
about additional details as they develop.
SAWPA has Shown Us the Money
On August 19, SAWPA General Manager Neil Cline delivered the attached letter and
a check in the amount of $4,052,476.53, for the purchase of the 9th mgd treatment
capacity unit. As noted in the letter, "Meet and Confer'' discussions are continuing on
the payment method for the 10th mgd capacity unit. There are other issues besides
the additional capacity that need to be resolved, including interest payments.
Approximately $60,000 in interest has been paid. Gary Streed, Director of Finance,
will provide an update on this issue at the August 27 Joint Boards meeting.
Procurement Card Program
Marc Dubois, our Contracts/Purchasing Manager, is currently investigating and will
subsequently launch a pilot "procurement card" program with the goal of reducing
purchasing and accounts payable costs for small-dollar, high-volume purchases by
utilizing electronic commerce technologies. The procurement card, often called
"smart cards," provide stored intelligence using unique integrated circuitry embedded
in the card to store vital information. The stored data is pre-loaded on the card with
A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 19 54
Joint Chair and Members of the
Boards of Directors
Page 2
August21 , 1997
set dollar values and security features to insure the Districts' procurement policies
and procedures are not compromised. The pilot program will incorporate written,
stringent guidelines on appropriate staff usage, transaction dollar limits, and
oversight. Hundreds of public agencies throughout the United States have adopted
this procurement strategy as a common sense approach to utilizing technology as an
effective tool for increased efficiency. It was recently noted in Orange County's
agenda report that they are launching a similar program. If you have questions on
this program, please call Marc at Extension 2650.
August DARTBOARD
The August 5 edition of the DARTBOARD is included in the attachments for your
information. It provides an update on current DART team activities.
Odor Complaints
During the warmer, more humid weather, odor complaints increase. Attached is a
copy of an Complaint Report dated August 5/6, which is typical of the calls, and
outlines the steps taken by staff to determine the cause and correct the situation.
Operations' engineers and technical staff have evaluated our existing odor control
system and changed the fan operation of some facilities to improve performance.
"A Blast from the Past"
Staff recently found a scrapbook filled with pictures and articles from the early days of
the Districts. I have included a copy of an August 1959 article from the PUBLIC
WORKS Magazine that was written by the then General Manager Lee M. Nelson. If
any of you would like to see the scrapbook, contact Blake Anderson at Extension
2020.
Title V Federal Operating Permit Application for Plant No. 2
Staff reports that the Title V federal operating permit application for Plant No. 2 has
been completed and submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) by the July 28, 1997 compliance date pursuant to the Title V of the
Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) amendments of 1990. Title V is a federal operating
permit program for major sources of air pollutant~. The program is l~ca.lly .
implemented by the SCAQMD. Title V does not include any new em1ss1on reduction
requirements but includes new permitting, monitoring, reporting and record keeping
requirements.
Preparation of this Title V permit application was a major undertaking, which required
a substantial commitment of internal resources with some additional consultant
Joint Chair and Members of the
Boards of Directors
Page 3
August 21, 1997
support. We believe the result of this significant effort is an excellent Title V
application document that goes beyond the strict requirements of the SCAQMD. We
expect to receive the draft Title V permit from SCAQMD in November 1997. The
overall impact of the new Title V permit on Districts' operations will be increased
monitoring and reporting requirements, and more public scrutiny on the Districts'
operations. Experience operating under the new Title V permit is needed before staff
can determine its impact on resource requirements and the compliance status.
We saved considerable consultant fees by using our own staff to complete most of
the application.
Source Control Brochures for New and Existing Businesses
As we have informed the Boards on previous occasions, the Districts' Source Control
Division has been developing a Business Assistance Center to provide new and
existing businesses in Orange County a "one-point" contact w ith the Districts and a
resource for information regarding permitting, compliance and pollution prevention.
One of the tasks of the Center is to promote a better understanding of the Districts'
goal and how the Source Control Program works to protect the environment.
Particular emphasis is being placed on disseminating information regarding
regulations, permitting and compliance assistance to businesses, either new or
existing in Orange County, when dealing with the Districts' regulatory and
environmental mandates.
To that end, the Center is developing (with the assistance of Graphic Services) a
series of five educational brochures that will provide both business and the
community at large information on what they need to do "to connect" with the
Districts. This series of brochures will provide those concerned with a practical "how
to" handbook.
The first brochure called "New Business? Old Business? How to Connect", has
already been published. The second brochure in the series, "New Business? Old
Business? Wastewater Discharge Permits", has just been published and is a guide to
permitting wastewater discharges. It contains an easy-to-follow checklist and diagram
that assists industries determine what kind of permit they would need for the type of
operation they intend to run.
Copies of both brochures, which were prepared by our Graphic Services group, are
included with the attachments. If you would like additional copies of either or both of
these brochures, please call Adriana Renescu at Extension 3828.
Joint Chair and Members of the
Boards of Directors
Page 4
August21 , 1997
Rate and Planning Advisory Committee Member's Comments
We have received a very complimentary letter (copy attached) from Mark Asturias,
City of Garden Grove staff member and a member of both the Rate and Planning
Advisory Committees. We have passed this on to our consultants, who have guided
these efforts.
Biosolids "Reinvestment" and Related News
Included in the attachments is an August 4, 1997 fax from WEF that discusses a
July 31 joint WEF/EPA meeting to discuss a proposal for EPA to "reinvest" in
biosolids. For the past two years, EPA has decreased its support for biosolids
activities. The proposal follows a negative series of reports on CNN, which we
relayed to you last month. Related issues are also discussed in the fax.
Utility Deregulation
Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, has reviewed an August 15,
1997 LA Times article on power deregulation. In the event you did not read it, I have
attached a copy for you.
"Rule of Necessity" and the Political Reform Act (PRA}
Attached is the August 15, 1997 LAW WATCH newsletter from Foley Lardner
Weissburg & Aronson, which outlines regulations of the PRA pertaining to invoking
the "rule of necessity". This rule allows a public official with an actual or potential
conflict of interest on a particular matter to vote on that matter if the lack of his or her
vote would prevent the governing body from taking action. If you have any questions
on this issue, you may want to discuss it with Tom Woodruff, or your agency's
attorney.
Recent Newspaper Articles of Interest
Attached are articles that you may have missed in the local newspapers. I have
included the article from the Sunday, August 17, LA Times on reclaimed waste water,
which addresses the issues OCWD and OCSD may be facing with the OCR project.
Public Awareness Water Conservation Program
To possibly reduce the flows coming into the plants du~ng .thes~ p~ak flow perio?s,
the Districts will be contacting Los Angeles County Sanrtat1on D1stncts and the City of
Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation to develop a regional, public awareness
Joint Chair and Members of the
Boards of Directors
Page 5
August21 , 1997
water-conservation program. For example, we may be asking the public to limit the
number of loads of laundry done on anticipated peak flow days and to take shorter
showers, both of which will help reduce flows. By working on a regional rather than
countywide basis, we will increase the probability of media exposure. And, with
greater exposure comes greater awareness and participation. Michelle Tuchman,
Director of Communications, will be heading this project.
Computer Purchase Loan Program
The Computer Purchase Loan Program has been a great success. To date, we have
had 40 employees apply for loans. Approximately $100,000 dollars have been spent,
and the Human Resources Department is continually receiving applications. If
demand continues, the FAHR Committee has agreed to request additional funding by
the Boards.
Sewer Service Fee Refunds
One of the issues that RAC has been looking at is transitioning from a system of
charging commercial users on the basis of square footage to a system of property tax
categories that are then charged on the basis of strength and flow. Under the new
system being evaluated by RAC, restaurants would be a category and would have
higher rates because of the strength of the discharge. On the other hand, big box
retail and warehouses, although having significant square footage, would enjoy a
sizeable decrease based on low strength and flow.
The inequities in the current system have resulted in a large number of refunds.
Firms, such as Revenue Enhancement, file on behalf of their clients and receive a
share of the clients' savings as their fee. In 1996-97, the Districts refunded over $7 .5
million to firms filing appeals. This represents over 10% of our anticipated user fee
revenue for 1996-97. We are hopeful that a user fee system based on flow and
strength would result in a more equitable system with less administrative time spent
on appeals and less revenue loss to the Districts.
If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me.
Pn J)l (£~ 11
Donald F. Mcintyre /
General Manager
DFM:jt
H:IWP.OTA\AOMIN\GM\OFM\BOARO.L TR\97\082798.00C
Joint Chair and Members of the
Boards of Directors
Page 6
August 21 , 1997
Attachments: August 19 Letter from SAWPA
August 5 DARTBOARD
Odor Complaint dated August 5/6
Article from August 1959 edition of PUBLIC WORKS Magazine
Two Source Control Business Assistance Brochures
August 5, 1997 Letter from Mark Asturias
August 4, 1997 Fax from WEF re Biosolids
August 15, 1997 Memo re LA Times Article on Power Deregulation
August 15, 1997 LAW WATCH newsletter re "Rule of Necessity"
Articles of Interest published during the past month
Donald F. Mcintyre
Published by OARTCommunications Task Tieam August 5, 1997
DARTBOARD
DART: DISTRICTS ASSESSMENT AND BEfNVENTION TEAM
Arlmjnistratjon Pn1ctices Team
During July, APT members
contacted Department Heads
regarding the Retention of
, Records report. The report is used
to gather information on
recommended retention times,
permit requirements and records
computerized or hard copied. July
1 3, the APT invited Penny Kyle,
Michelle Tuchman and Algee
Eusley(Records Librarian Orange
County Water District.) Algoe
Eusley presented a general
overview of Records Management
and helped the team in
determining the right approach to
record management goals and
objectives. In June, the APT met
with Finance to discuss the use of
the emergency Overtime Report.
After discussion, Finance said that
they dfd not use or need the report.
However, a memo will be written
to inform Districts' staff that each
division should develop limited
procedures for their own needs.
This change significantly reduces
· the materials and labor r~quired
for distribution of these reports.
July 7. APT drafted a memo for
the main DART member's review.
The team continues to review the
Travel Authorization and Expense
Reports. 1-n August. a field trip 1o
Honda is scheduled to see their
· retention and as-built
documentation.
Adaptive Work Force
1 Late in June the AWF team
formed a P-2 area team. Their first
meeting included skilled trades
and cmerators. On Juty 1 they~ requirements. Chris talked about
discussed scheduling boards'"for data linking and recommended
PM's and receiving them before that the team choose an Oracle-
the first of each month, scheduling based CMMS. There will be a
and possible interaction between future project for warehouse data
the area team and TPIT. To integration so the CMMS can talk
improve productivity, TPIT is to J.D. Edwards. Currently team
looking at efficiency, best members are involved in polling
practices. communication, ; stal<eholders, review of the
effectiveness, planning, planning and scheduling reports
scheduling, integration, safety, and compiling survey comments.
accountability and warehouse! Also, the team is idenlifying f
maintenance to improve efficiency warehouse/purchasing and I
due to lack of parts. July 15 , the information technology/data
AWF team met with Raj concerns.
Savilingam a consultantfor j
maintenance reorganization and TPIT
voted to bring him on board. July The team is working closely with J
29, the AWF formed task teams the J-42 P.lant Automation Project. f
for broadhanding, skill-based pay Dean Fisher attended the July 1 I
and to evaluate cross-training. In meeting as a communication link ~
early August, Bob Ooten will between the projects. The team I
discuss the States Regional Board will work closely on Construction
approach. to certifying the drawings and P&IDs. TPIT is j
maintenance trades so that drafting a report to outline the work 1
equipment isolation can be done. for resources and scheduling ,
CMMSTeam
ln the later part of June a memo
went to Gerald Jones reporting
that each member will need to
spend approximately 15 hours per
week to do the required research.
A Project Plan is complete and
includes systems requirements
and performance, implementation
study, system baseline, bench
, marking, potential vendors, cost
analysis, finaLreport and
evaluation. The Project time line is
July ·97 io October '97. July 2,
members of the CMMS team met
with Chris Dahl to discuss systems
required to support J-42. July 2
marked the beginning of Digestion
map13ing tor both ptants. July 16,
Jill Howard met with Joe Tucker to
discuss CMMS automation
activities and tagging for the
' automation project. A table giving
team member responsibilities
were discussed and distributed at
the July 30 meeting.
' I
4 POTPOURRI I
July 16, selected members of j
DART pre!iented the Phase 111-Six I
Month Sta:\us Report to Don
Mcintyre. You can contact Randy I
Harris, ~.6017 for a copy. _
• ..
I -·
'
Plantl D
Plant2 [251
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Complaint Report
" ; . ~-. . .
. ··, ...
o.ate : ,A t.13 uQ T s ' b ) Complaint Type : Odor
Tim<. : 1.. "#'J _r'" ~~-----~~......--~~
Day : -~S (w.e,A Noise
other _o _________ _ Other
ca
n
Complaintant : .0{ . Wq41A f k Phone: 'J&S--~ s5--3
Address: Cif ~ (. C) /It ~ u~~ Cross Streets : e('f>-d fc. ~ft ff.. ~
< ! . /Vi
* Include the location of the complaint and the day and time when it was first noticed if dijf erent than
the date and time of the complaint.
Date: <:&I s-r~) I q 7
Time : __ -1.-____...-Z........,<2 ...... Q...,.._ __
Action Taken
Odor Circuit Taken:
Odor Circuit Included:
Wind Direction and Speed :
Yes
Yes
No
No B
Was the Treatment Plant the Odor Source? Yes ~ No D
** If Odor is related to Huntington Beach storm drain system call (714) 960-8861 and relay all inf o'?"ati.on
cc : General Manager
Asst. General Manager
Director : 0 & M
Control Center PL 1
Operations Center PL2
Pl Chief Operator
P2 Chief Operator
Air Quality Manager
3410 AQMD Engineer
Signed:=~· aperati ns Supervisor
Date : $ / <o / 'I 7 '
REVISED:12/18/96
G:\EXCEl.\OM\3440\LOSURDO\COMPLAINT.XLS
--. .... tLAllJ .! !!l!!l!. CIRCll!l ····-
-······ .. llCUll•
tU•Hftlf -· iiiia···
lllrLUEllT JLOU: l '1.c.2 HGD
H£1HE LL lEVEL 1 7.3 FEET
reel l FUD RAJ£ I '-\ :1 r BALS/HIN.
TOTAL PEROXIDE: q,oo GALS/DAY
[0111111:
. ' . \ NOTE1 Fnt.LnWIHG AH DOOR cm·PLAINT IN:UJOE lltE SQUAnE SPACES IN lHF. nnnn r.mr.un.
DATE: :»I s/9 7
PAY: (; (kMtlf)
TIHE: "'2-I ! S:
OPER: -0~ (-ltJ+.,.SJ?c
111 Hll Vl!l.OC I Tl 1 5
lllltll!Atl lllftltcflUN DRUJa.
m
z-
BERMUDA
3 KAHULUI
MAHALO
ALOHA
PLAY A
4
z :s !!!
if.
!!j MOKIHANA
HUDSON
< < ::;; u
-----
\
< a:
I-~RAMBLE (I)
GULSTRAND
DAYTONA <(
I (/) ::> CD
,_
< a:
0 ~ m _, < m Z MOLOKAI
TIKJ
< 3 LANAI
LEILANI
E
ii ::> t? :s _, ii < :;: (I) 0 5
iii ifi
ROCKPOINT (I)
BEACHS DE
z ::;; ~ < u w ifi ::;; u
8 ::> <
(I) (I) >
w ~BANNING
MELINDA
0 z ~
0 0 0 !:
(C)1994 T hnm::ls Arns M;:inc;
: ...
PUBLIC WORKS Magazine
Vol. 90, No. 8 • A~gust, 1959
103 Miles of Trunk Sewers ..
for CQUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
LEE M. NELSON,
General Manager,
Orange County Sanitation Districts,
Santa Ana, California
ONE of the largest sewer projects
ever undertaken in this coun-
. try was started in Orange County,
California, this past year. In July
and August voters in three of eleven
Sanitation Districts located in the
county went to the polls and ap-
proved bond issues totaling $23,-
180,000. The fact that passage of the
bund issues meant increased tax
rates from 9 cents to 20 cents per
$100 assessed property valuation had
no effect in deterring the voters. In
Sanitation District 11, for instance,
where a two-thirds majority was
needed the issue passed by a vote
of 567 to 147.
Voter acceptance of these bond
issues was not just a natural oc-
currence though. Through the ef-
forts of our Orange County Sanita-
tion Districts staff, an effective
public information campaign was
launched to make residents acutely
aware of the serious need for ex-
panded sewer facilities.
The people were informed that
many trunk sewers in the area were
flowing from 93 percent to 100 per-
cent full during peak hours; and on
a few occasions they had been so
overtaxed that sewage backed up
into the streets. This, plus the fact
that new residents are moving into
Orange County at the rate of 200
each day, necessitating 50 new
homes daily or over 18,000 homes a
year, made the residents realize that
they had no real choice in the mat-
ter. Disneyland, located in the popu-
lation center of Orange County,
attracts additional millions of visi-
tors to the area. New sewers were
needed, and immediately.
The development of any area, in
my opinion, is dependent on four
basic facilities: 1) water supply; 2)
transportation and communications;
3) power-electric and gas; 4) waste
·----~-.... : .~ ::~ . :: ~ ~~
~ -,J
. ' e LOCATION of trunk aewer lines needed by Orange County ii pointed out tO
the County Supervisors and the County Health Officer by the author, at right~
...• ----~ . -·· __ ..:...._ ----·-----·-• ·,!..;
disposal -domestic and industrial.
Orange County was in adequate
supply of the first three, but not the
fourth. It's my personal feeling that
sewers become important only when
absent. They're like the fourth
wheel on an automobile.
District Organization
Perhaps one thing that made the
project so.successful was the unique
organization of our Sanitation Dis-
tricts. They were created because
of a geographical need. Sewage dis-
posal in southern California poses
more of a problem than in most
areas of the nation as there are
no rivers with sufficient water the
year around to carry off treated
e GRAVEL bed in trench bottom
provides stable bed for the clay
pipe, Over Y2 mile was laid daily
in District 11 to complete work
before start of the rainy season.
wastes. In Orange County some of
our cities are many miles distant
from the shorelines of the Pacific.
In 1921 the Orange County Joint
Outfall Sewer (JOS) was organized
by agreement between the cities of
e EACH YEAR, in housing developments and growing cities, 18,000 new homes are being built in Orange County. New trunl..
sewers became a critical need and County sewage treatment plants were expanded. Plant No. 1 now has a capacity of 55 mgd.
Anaheim and Santa Ana for the
purpose of sharing jointly construc-
tion costs and the operation of a
screening plant and ocean outfall.
Between 1921 and 1927, the cities
of Fullerton and Orange and the
sanitary districts of La Habra,
Placentia, Garden Grove and Buena
Park became participants in this
joint agreement.
Through these participating agen-
cies, the JOS constructed a treat-
ment plant, several trunk sewers
and an outfall to the Pacific Ocean,
now known as the old ocean outfall.
Thus, eight of the northern and
central cities and sanitary districts
were served by a jointly owned
sewerage system at a cost within
the economic capability of each.
There were many problems in
administering this joint venture at
city levels due to limitations of city
authority outside of corporate limits.
Community organizations and civic
groups were conscious of county-
wide development over a period of
20 years and of the growing need
for a program to service rapidly
expanding areas. The factors of ad-
ministration, expansion and devel-
opment called for further action.
In 1946 the Orange County Board
of Supervisors authorized a board
of consulting engineers to prepare
a sewerage survey report. After
considerable study this report was
modified and became the basis for
the formation of the eight sanitation
districts. Organizational phases of
the sanitation districts were under
jurisdiction of the Board of Super-
visors. After formation, each district
became an independent political
subdivision with its own governing
board which operates under the dis-
trict act of the health and safety
code of the state.
The function of collecting and
transporting sewage from local areas
to the sanitation districts' facilities
is performed by cities, sanitary dis-
tricts and other special districts.
Through inter-district contracts,
means of administration, construc-
tion and operation of facilities for
the eight districts were established.
The joint administrative agreement
and the joint construction and
operation agreement are the two
basic contracts governing the com-
bined business of the districts. Pro-
visions are made to permit other
agencies or combinations of agencies
to participate in the Joint Adminis-
trative Organization. Under these
Functions of Sanitation Districts
TRUNK
SEWERS
OWN & OPERATE
TREATMENT
PLANTS OCEAN OUTFALL
e SCHEMATIC diagram of the sewage collection system owned and operated by the
Orange County Sanitation Districts. Trunk sewers are 1 S-inch to 78-inch diameter.
contracts the Joint Administrative
Organization, with one central of-
fice, administers the business and
operating expense in direct ratio
that its usage of facilities bears to
the cost, and all districts share the
joint administrative expense.
Under California law, county
sanitation districts have broad pow-
ers to provide collection, treatment
and disposal of all types of waste.
However, all of the sanitation dis-
tricts in Orange County limit their
activities to area-wide collection,
treatment and disposal of sewage
and liquid in.dustrial wastes. They
do not handle garbage, refuse and
other solid wastes; neither do they
own or operate local sewage col-
lection systems. Their function i..;;
the ownership and operation of ma-
jor trunk sewers (from 15-in. to
78-in. diameters), two sewage treat-
ment plants and a 78-in. diameter
disposal outfall 7 ,000 feet into the
BUlLETIN TO PHYSICIANS
retained independent engineering
firms to proceed with plans to pro-
vide the necessary sewage disposal
facilities. Lowry-Overmyer and As-
sociates of Santa Ana were assigned
the work in District 11 and the same
firm working jointly with Boyle En-
gineering, also of Santa Ana, pre-
pared surveys for Districts 2 and 3.)
Promoting Bond Issues
Early in 1958 the Orange County
Sanitation Districts started their
promotion campaign to acquire the
needed increase in collection facili-
ties. Individual promotion programs
were started in Districts 2, 3 and 11.
In District 2 a bond issue of S8,650,-
000 was proposed; in District 3, $13,-
015,000; and in District 11, $1,515,000.
The overwhelming voter approval
in all three Districts gave us the
confidence we needed and we im-
mediately set to work. Actual con-
struction started in September,
,._;;;-,..;,;.-
ff l~t re·
canc1 HOM1r
'ifu
....
·SEWER
BONDS • •ucri0~
·AUGUST ·5th
1958
PUBLIC \"FORMATION
PAMPHLET
e SPECIAL bulletins and public information pamphlets formed part of the effec-
tive promotional campaign that brought an overwhelming approval of the bond issue.
Pacific Ocean. The original collec-
tion of sewage at the local level is
handled by individual cities and
sewering districts within the Sani-
tation Districts.
Sanitation Districts
The accompanying chart shows
schematically the system owned and
operated by the Sanitation Districts
in Orange County and also shows
the cities and local agencies from
which sewage and industrial wastes
are collected in Districts 2, 3 and 11.
Late in 1957, the Directors of our
Orange County Sanitation Districts
1958, .·and will be completed, with
the system in operation, by Decem-
ber, 1959.
Extra strength, vitrified clay pipe
was selected as the most suitable
pipe for the job. Some 70 miles of
clay pipe, ranging from 12 inches
to 42 inches in diameter, will be
used in lengths up to 5 feet. The
proposed trunk sewers are designed
to serve and have a useful life of
at least 50 years. In areas within
the three districts where pipe over
42 inches in diameter is required,
the larger pipe will be protected by
mitable liners.
Many of the gravity sewers in the
area are located below sea level and
are subject to tidal actions. Hence,
rapid pipe laying is economically
necessary. George Dakovich, Los
Angeles contractor installing pipe in
District 11, has been laying over a
half mile of pipe a day all with hot
pour joints. Over 103 miles of pipe
in all 3 districts will be in the
ground and operating as an integral
part of our Orange County sanita-
tion system by December of this
year. To the best of my knowledge,
this makes it one of the largest sin-
gle sewer projects ever undertaken
in this country and scheduled for
completion in so short a time.
After treatment, all sewage from
the collection system passes into an
ocean outfall line and is pumped
into the ocean some 3 miles from
shore. Since this part of southern
California is noted for its vacation
areas and beaches we have to insure
that there is no danger of contami-
nating the coastal waters beyond
safe limits. To detect possible pol-
lution, readings and water samples
are taken twice a day, every 3,000
feet, along the coastal section in the
vicinity of the outfall.
A great deal of credit for the suc-
cessful planning and execution of
this undertaking must go to Willis
Warner, who has been Chairman of
the Orange County Board of Super-
visors for over 20 years. The mayors
and city officials of the cities within
the districts were also highly instru-
mental in informing the citizenry,
as were the various Citizens Com-
mittees composed of businessmen,
educators, the clergy and others.
Everyone pitched in to see that the
voters were apprised of the facts.
The voters did the rest.
We now have a sanitary collection
system that will be adequate to the
year 2000. The excellence of its de-
sign will make subsequent additions
a simple matter.
I'd personally like to urge officials
of other sanitation districts through-
out the country to take special note
of what has been done here. Public
works projects do not necessarily
take years to get under way; if the
need really exists, and you take ad-
vantage of every means available
to inform the taxpayers, it can be
accomplished quickly and efficiently.
Perhaps even more important is the
fact that if the people are fully in-
formed, they will not begin to won-
der where their monev went as
soon as the trenches a~e covered.
As public officials we can't afford
to forget that a satisfied citizenry
holds the key to the door of future
civic improvements.
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA
11222 ACACIA PARKWAY, P.O. BOX 3070, GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92642
AGENCY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
GARDEN GROVE
August 5, 1997
Mr. Don Mcintyre, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Administration Building
I 0844 Ellis A venue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728
RE: RATE ADVISORY AND PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEES
Dear Mr. Mcintyre:
(714) 741-5123
As a member of both the Rate Advisory and Planning Advisory Committees I wanted to pass on
a personal note to you. I appreciate CSDOC's efforts in working with the Orange County
community to establish these committees to look at CSDOC's future. The RAC and PAC have
met for almost a year now and CSDOC staff have been very professional and patient in
responding to our questions and comments. I have personally spoken with some of your staff,
including Nancy Wheatley, Gary Streed and Judy Wilson, to name just a few. They have always
been willing to take time out of their busy schedules to talk over issues or questions I have.
I also want to congratulate you on your choice of consultants. Mr. Paul Brown of Camp Dresser
& McKee and Mr. Steve McDonald of Carollo Engineers have made ,the process educational,
interesting and informative. To their credit they have also kept a widely diverse group of people
with different interests and agendas focused on our mission as an advisory body. They have also
been able to "roll with the punches" whenever the committee's throw them one. I know I have
tested Mr. Brown's and Mr. McDonald's patience several times but they have always listened
and taken the time to meet with me whenever needed to talk about my questions, concerns and
comments.
I look forward to completing the mission of the two committees. I believe the committees will
give CSDOC valuable input about business and residential concerns in Orange County. I know
that a few of your Directors have attended our workshops and are aware of our efforts. I hope
they appreciate the efforts of CSDOC staff, Camp Dresser & McKee and Carollo Engineers as
well, and communicate this to other Directors who have not been able to attend.
Sincerely,
JJ!~~
Mark Asturias
Economic Development Manager
MA :mi: (p/econdev/mark/sanitati/sandis7)
RUG-04-1997 16:00 LJEF
TO:
Water EnwiroDDtent Federation®
Preserving E, Bnbandng
the Global lJfzleJ" EnuhonmenJ
MEMORANDUM
Distribution
703 984--2492 P.01
l'KES!Dzr-T
Dillv G. lbnrLT
Co/-.,,_,CA
PRESQ)JNl'-ILECT
r.. Da!eJamb$Gll, P.f..
()1114ba,!lti
TX
ENT
bvris. P.E.
Stanlon A LcSicur
HillnanJ. OR
NJ' PiESIDliHl'
FROM: Tim Williams. Government Affairs Director
Ridwd 1). Kuchwithet, Ph.O •• P.li.
K.olUIU Ci~ NO
r.DCUml DIRECJ'OJl
DATE: August4. 1997 Quinala: Brawn
.41e:radria, VA
RE: This Week in Washington
WEF/EPA Meeting Focuses on Biosolids "Reinvestment''
WEF President Billy Tumer and USEPA Assistant Administrator for Water Bob
Perciagepe met July ~1 to di~UHi a proposal for EPA to areinve5r in bio&olid&. WEF,
USEPA, and other stakeholders will meet to further discuss the proposal during the
WEF/AWWA Joint Water Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference in
Philadelphia. PA starting August 2, 1997.
For the past two years, EPA has been .decreasing its support for biosolids activities,
citing budget constraints and the low risk associated with land application and other
management options. But during the July 31 meeting, Perciasepe outlined several
areas for increased USEPA support of biosolids recycling. These include: conducting a
new national biosolids quality survey (the last survey was completed in 1988);
developing a Code of Good Pradice for land application: inaeased USEPA oversight
and enforcement; and additional support for technical assistance and research and
development.
WE.F and other stakeholders have advocated a continued strong role for USEPA in
promoting biosolids recycling. The reinvestment proposal follows a negative series of
reports on CNN. For further information, contact Gene DeMichele, WEF Biosolids
Program Manager at 703/684-2400, or e-mail gdemichele@wef.org.
In Related News ••• -
A study released August 2 by the Worldwatch Institute warns against the •potential
dangers of using sewage sludge as fertilizer on farm lands.• The report, authored by
Gary Gardner of Worldwatch Institute, argues the wastewater treatment systems in the
United states usually combine household sewage and industrial runoff. and therefore,
foods fertilized with such wastes may be tainted with heavy metals and dioxins from the
industrial wastes. Gardner also conte~ds the USEPA limits on pollutants in landapplied
biosolids are less stringent than many other countries. For a copy of the report, contact
Gene DeMichele (see above contact information).
601 Wythe Street • Altundri¥, YA 22314-1994 USA• 1·703-684°2400 • 1-703-684-2492 (FAX)
,, : . .,
.I : . '•
This Week in Washington
August 4, 1997
page2
Clinton Commits Feds to Lake Tahoe Water Quality Plan
President Clinton committed the federal government to spend more than $50 million in
the next 2 years to stop pollution in lake Tahoe. Clinton said the administration would
''take more than 25 specific actions" to protect the Lake Tahoe Basin, which spans the
border between Northern California and Nevada. Among the priorities, he said, is
restoration of "the lake's fabled water quality" through cooperative efforts of federal and
state agencies, including development of computer models to predict how
watershed improvements will contribut~ to water quality and construction of a new
plpellne lu t;U1 1v~y wastewater out of the basin. C~Jifnmira ;md Nevada h;;1ve pledQed
$XO million to cupport preservatinn nf the lake. which suffers from heavy algae growth
Ann the effects of urban runoff. Clinton made the remarks during a visit to the region
with Vice President Al Gore, USEPA Assistant Administrator tsob Perclas~µt:, -=-• •d other
officials.
Correction
The July 21, 1997 issue of •This Week in Washington" listed an incorrect bill number for
the Toxicity Testing legislation currently before Congress. The correct bill number is
H.R.2138.
TOTAL P.02
,, : .. .. ,
August15, 1997
MEMORANDUM
TO: Don Mcintyre
General Manager
Blake Anderson
Chief Operations Officer
FROM: Bob Ooten ~l~
Director of Operations & Maintenance
SUBJECT: Article in the Times on Deregulation
Marketers are now trying to sell power (see attached article). The key paragraphs to
review are underlined on page 4 of the attachment.
• Purchasing power will only affect % of the power bill since that is the cost of
generation.
• Marketers promise savings but cannot guarantee.
• The Marketers price to beat will be the benchmark set up by the Statewide
Power Exchange.
RJO:pjm
H:\wp.dta\om\341 O\FINAL\RJO\CORRESP.97\970M0306MEM.DOC
Attachment
l
COLUMN ONE
~
L-, At, T,~
A~~
s l l~ 'l'l7
·~~ lo-(. j_
-·The State's New Power Brokers r
•With utility
deregulation months
away, salespeople are
scrambling to sell
electricity in what will
be a $6-billion market.
By CHRIS KRAUL
TIMES STAFF WRITER
UPLAND-Articulate and
armed with the tools of his
trade-glossy brochures and a
well-oiled spiel-salesman
Tony Wayne drew charts on the
conference room wall as he tried
to persuade his poker-faced po-
tential buyer that he could beat
the competition with the lowest
price possible.
At the top of his game, the
graying ex-Marine Corps officer
paused only to field questions
from his quarry, Lewis Homes
property manager Paul Lubin.·
·Simple answers to complex is-
sues came easily and nothing
threw him off stride. After all,
Wayne had given dozens of
presentations just like it during
thelastyear. ·
.. Bottom line, we save you 5%
to 15%, you're at no risk, and
you have 100% reliability, just
like now,'' Wayne, 57, said in a
calm, assuring tone as he slid a
·contract ·across the table.
Scenes like this one are
played out countless times a day
across California-that of a
practiced peddler seeking a lu-
crative prize. But Wayne is a
new and different kind of sales-
man. He's not pushing comput-
I .!"
t-ers, retirement plans, aluminum I
siding or locomotives.
He is selling electricity. !""
I •,\
There is a small army of Tony
Waynes called .. power market-~
ers" fanning out across the state
as the Jan. 1 date of California's i
·electricity deregulation ap-~
proaChes. All are vying for a 1
piece of a $6-billion market by L
bustling electrons to millions of t
California residential and com-
mercial customers who may
soon start choosing their power
source. i-It's part of a marketing free-
for-all that commenced in Sep-
tember when Gov. Pete Wilson
signed the nation's most com-
prehensive electricity deregula-
tion law. It ordered that each
, residential and business cus-
tomer of the three large inves-
Pleue see POWER, All
--··-.. ·--. __ !".~:..: __ 7'" .. _-.•··-·· ... -· ..... -.... -· •
Continued from A1 · ·
tor-owned utilities-Southern
California Edison, Pacific Gas &
Electric and San Diego Gas &
Electric-be given the choice of ·
power source. i
The upshot of the law i;8 that r
Californians who previously 1 thought about electricity only ;
when they paid their month9' bills r
will soon be making choices o~ I
where to buy their power. ~d this -
will create billions of dollars m new
business for . companies such as
Eastern Pacific· Energy in Brea,
where Tony Wayne ~orks. .
As Wayne noted: 'Everyone m f .
California is a potential custQmer." ,
The em~gence of a new power ;
. market echoes what happened ·
when the long distance telephone ·
market was deregulated a decade , .
ago. Suddenly a basic service. that
required little thought becomes a
major choice for consumers-and
one that can lead to significant
savings. · . ·
Wayile was wooing Lubin be-
cause of Lewis Homes' extensive
holdings in apartments, retail cen-
ters and industrial buildings where
common areas-laundries, parking
lots and so on-use $1 million
worth of electricity a year. Wayne
was only the latest salesman to
promise Lubin to shave big bucks
off his monthly Soutliern California
Edison bill. ·
Lubin represents only a tiny frac-
tion of the market up for grabs.
National retail cbaiDS, manuf1:c-
turers, breweries and the Univermty
of California system all are ''pursu·
· tng price quotations," said Mark L
·Shunk. vice president of Energy
Pacific, a 'power marketing venture
set up by· Southern California Gas
and San Diego Gas & Electric.
Cities from Long Beach to Davis
are considering bids . from energy
providers to power their municipal
buildings. Wayne Is also one of
many bidders on the Long Beach
contract. ·
California First
. to Deregulate l r A. ll that business-and Califor-'
nia's importance as a proving
ground for power marketers as the
rest of the nation deregulates-is
attracting the biggest energy com-
panies and utilities in the nation.
Enron of Houston, Southern Co.
of Atlanta, Dlinova near Chicago, ~
PacifiCorp. of Portland and . Duke i
Power of North Carolina are here, ~
.as are smaller companies such as ,
Green Mountain Energy of Ver-i
mont, a green energy retailer. Most ~
have opened offices in California .
and unleashed hundreds of sales-L
people who, like ·wayne, have one E
·goal in mind: stealing customers
. away from the utilities. f-
Emon alone now has 300 em-l
ployees in California, a "big chunk" ~
of whom are salespeople, an execu ..
· tive said. Wayne's Eastern Pacific
Energy, a relative small fry, has a -
sales force numbering more than 60.
; Smaller companies without the
. resources to send out salespeople r
·or buy expensive air time and. ;
·advertising space plan to ~e the Lf
: Internet and mailing lists to reach·
what the marketers call "affinity ~
groups" of consumers-those with
: shared interests or political beliefs. f ~ "We're going after ordinary folk
: who want their electricity pur-
. chases to refiect their values," said i
John Schaefer, president of Clean :
·Power Works, a Santa Cruz-based '
. company that is selling geother-
. mal, wind and solar power.
--Altogether, more thari 75 com-
panies have registered to -market t ·
power in the state. After Labor \
. Day, many will launch mass media • •
campaigns targeting residential 1
customers. f
Their opportunities flow from
the promise of cheaper energy in a
state where residents generally
piy 50% more than the national
average for electricity because of
the utilities' heavy reliance on
high-priced nuclear and alterna-.
ttve energy. . . !
· California utilities are not stand-1 .Ing by idly. They are trying tena-
·ciously to bang on to~~ custom-·
era-while slugging it out with
·Wayne and other newcomers for . .. .
I ·'
business outside thei? traditional Those power market mechanics
service areas. F.ach utility has are so important that Wayne, Gib-
formed" a power marketing subsidi-son and other members of his staff
ary to do ju&t that. now spend 25% of their time in San
Many companies, including -· Francisco, lobbying the state Public
Wayne's, have formed alliances. His Utilities Commission and duking it
Eastern Pacific Energy, largely a _ ., out with the utilities, each side
sales and service operation, is part-· striving for advantage in a market
nering with an affiliate of Washing-set to open in less than five months. ton Water Power, one of the lowest-. · · For example Wayne's company
cost generators in the nation. The and other power marketers are ~ affiliate will ship hydroelec:-. _ . fighting a ~tility proposal to charge
triC power to Wayne's California · consumers-up to $15 to switch over
customers from the Northwest via to outside providers. They also
--theinterstatepowergrtd. --· oppose the utilities' proposal to
The low cost of that hydropower : limit the number of accounts they
. J and a five-year commitment from ~ will switch over to outside power
I WWP to supply · him with 300. • peddlers to a combined 28,000 per
, megawatts of power-enough to I month statewide.
· light 300,000 homes-gives Wayne : The power marketers oppose the
a good chance of beating the price limits and fees because they be-
• of energy that will be sold over . lieve they will discourage people
California's soon-to-be-created from switching from the utilities.
Power Exchange. That's the pool They argue that transfers can be
for energy generated by PG&E made electronically and should not
.Edison and SDG&E whose bench~ incur a charge. With 12 million
mark will be set largely by more metered accounts in the state, the
costly fossil fuels. · limit on transfers could cause long
The first brass ring went to 4ielays and customer frustration.
Arizol)a Public Service, which "At that rate, it will take 10
: claims to have made the first retail years to get all the customers
: delivery of electricity in California, switched Why spend any money
supplying aerospace manufactW'el' advertising? It's like sending an
Aerojet of Rancho Cordova with invitation to the party and no one
· 20% of Its power starUng July 29 can get through the door," said Lou
That delivery was possible· becau00 · Pai, chief executive of Enron En-
; ~cramento Municipal Utility Dis-. erp Services. .
· trict decided to give some of its , 'We need to make sure restden-J customers "direct access" or free I tial customers don't get stuck·in ·a
· -choice on July l, six months in J queue for months on end . . . given l advance of the three investor-
1
our expectations for customer ex-owned utilities. citement about electricity choice," .
(Last summer's law covered said Julie Blunden, the San Fran-
. only investor-owned utilities cisco-based regional director for
leaving it up to the state's munici: 1 Green Mountain Energy Resomces.
pal utilities to decide when and if to ' Homeowners, by and large, have
open up their customers to outside not yet felt the marketing push, but
· power suppliers. Los Angeles De-. big businesses statewide have been
partment of Water and Power says hearing sales pitches such as
~ its 1.3 million custOmers will not be Wayne's for months. That's be-
.! able to choose providers on Jan. 1 cause most power marketers would
· but will be able to at some unspecl: prefer to grab the high volume j~ lied date.) . .. accounts of industry and big
Wayne is doing more than sell-
• 1 ing: He is helping invent the power
market as he goes. While Wayne
pitched Lubin, his associate Betsy
Gibson was in San Francisco talk-
ing up state regulators and other
power marketers, trying to hash
out a myriad of details, from com-
puter language ·to billing cycles
-· that will determine how the power
market will be implemented.
~ ~ ~o\4-
The eneration rtion of a t !-business. And because selling resi-cal mon ec c represents
dent.ial customers will be more . ut e • e
time-consuming and\ess profitable. l re8t o wis omes ayment
Other companies say they are . wo go to pay fixed
staying away from the homeowner costs, sucn as power delivery, cus-
market because they can't convert tomer service and debts related to
them with a Dip of a switch as ts nuclear and attematlve energy.
done with long distance telephone . Wayne tOld Liibin liOW the free
accounts. Wayne and other power ,power market will operate, how new
marketers need signed col)tracts state agencies will .regulate pooling
from new customers. . and delivery.of energy, and so on.
Wayne said selling power to · But Lubin still had ·a difficult
'. individual homeowners makes the 1 time grasping the market and
most sense when residents can asked a succession of questions:
somehow be approached in groups, "How will I know rm getting the
·such as apartment residents and lowest price? Whom do I call if
mobile home park dwellers. there's a problem? How much will I
; Lubin and Lewis Hoines were save and how do I know rm getting
attractive prospects to Wayne in the lowest price for energy?"
part because he hoped_Lubin would . He added: "I! this is W be !
· give him permission to market guesswork, rm not in Tn
energy. to tenants of 2,000 apart-~make a decision I need facts
. ment units that Lewis Homes ; m front of me." Lubin complained
I. owns.· . · ; that other companies had not been 1
1 able to quote him specific prices. Pitch Complicated \ · Wahl!e told Lubin he could not , . • • ~ ee hiDi a sPeCific pnce, that bv Uncertainties · no one could because energy prices I " · '. fiucfuate and the Statewide Power Just explaining the power market · Exchingm the commOdity ¥£:1 that
· to prospects, even sophisticated j will set e &enchriiirk p ~ce that
· customers such as Lubin, is a marlteters Will compete against,
: compUcated job, one that Wayne I bas not been set up xet.
hopes will be simplified next month I But Wayne promised Lubin
when utilities begin an $87-mlllion something he liked: a formula by
· education program-paid for by which Lewis Homes would receive
ratepayers-to explain the choices. i 70% of all energy savings from what
I In fact, much of Wayne's pres-I F.cDson Charged him, with Wayne's
. entation to Lubin was a primer in t F.astem Pacific Energy receiving ! Deregulation 101. He explained . ! 30%. The worst case for Lubin . ~ that the choices that Lubin and I would be to pay the same price for ~ other Californians make on their energy he now pays to Fmson,
'. PQWer B\lDj)lier Will iffect6i1'y which Wayne promised t.o match.
abOut o&i?uarter of their -"If we don't save you money, we
the raw of power generatlOn. don't make any money," Wayne
. He reminded Lubm that even if I told Lubin, who responded that ; he decided to buy power from Wayne's deal was .. the most con-
. Wayne's company, he would con-: creteproposalwe'vereceived."
• tinue to be billed by Edison, which ! Stepping out of Lubin's office
will simply pay Eastern Pacific and into the sweltering Upland
-Energy its generation portion, just aftemoon, Wayne exuded confi-
, as Pacific Bell pays long distance dence that he was .close to a sale.
telephone companies out of what it He had led Lubin through a mine-
. collects. ' field of murky market issues and
· pesky competitors and nudged him
toward a deal.
'1t's nice being the smartest guy
at the table. I always feel that way
after a presentation," Wayne said.
On Monday, five· days after
Wayne's presentation, Lubin
. agreed to a five-year contract. .
97-12 A Legal Newsletter from Foley Lardner Weissburg & Aronson AUG. 15, 1997
The governing body of a public
entity must explain, in the minutes
of the pertinent meeting, its rea-
sons for invoking the so called
"rule of necessity". This rule
allows a public official with an
actual or potential conflict of inter-
est on a particular matter to vote
on that matter if the lack of his or
her vote would prevent the govern-
ing body from taking action.
However, under the Political
Reform Act. ("Act"), a governing
body may only invoke the rule of
necessity_ (without violating the
Act) when that particular public
official's participation is "legally re-
quired for the action or decision to
be made."
Regulations adopted under the
Act. require a public official who
has a financial interest in a govern-
ing body's decision to follow a spe-
cific disclosure procedure in order
to participate in the decision. The
regulations also prescribe that the
official must "disclose as a matter
of official public record" the exis-
tence of the financial interest,
•describe with particularity" the
nature of the interest, and state
why no alternative source of
decision making exists {the
•Disclosure").
In Michael George Kunec v.
Brea Redevelopment Agency, the
court interpreted these disclosure
requirements to require the govern-
ing body to specify in the minutes
PUBLIC AGENCY'S
GOVERNING BODY
MUST EXPLAIN
REASONS FOR
INVOKING "RULE
OF NECESSITY"
of the applicable meeting the reasons
for invoking the rule of necessity.
Because the agency failed to do so,
its decision to condemn certain prop-
erty as part of a redevelopment
project was invalidated.
01997 Foley Lardner Weissburg & Aronson. Reprod~on Ylith amibution pe~
In this matter, two members of
the agency's five member govern-
ing body had financial interests
which could have been affected by
·a decision to condemn the prop-
erty. Because the statute autho-
rizing condemnation required four
affirmative votes, the governing
body could not act without the
participation of an additional
member. By invoking the rule of
necessity the agency sought to
rehabilitate at least one mem-
ber and act to condemn the
property.
Both the trial court and the
appellate court held that the agen-
cy's action was invalid. In particu-
lar, the appellate court, in review-
ing the agency's minutes, found
that the disclosure in the minutes
was inadequate. The minutes
stated that the vote was preceded
by a process to "legally invest" a
board member with the power to
participate, recognizing the mem-
ber's conflict of interest. The
interest was described in the min-
utes as property ownership "with-
in 300 feet of the perimeter of the
[redevelopment] project." This
description was found insufficient
because it did not clearly disclose
the nature of the financial interest,
but the court declined to indicate
how the disclosure could have
been adequately made. In addi-
tion, the court stated that the
minutes did not explain why there
was no alternative source of deci-
sion making as required by the
regulations. For example, the
court stated that the minutes did
not explain why this governing
body was the only body able to
reach a decision on the condem-
nation proceeding.
Since an official with a poten·
tial conflict, as opposed to an
actual conflict, is not exempt from
the disclosure requirement, the
appellate court also held that when
the rule of necessity is invoked
because of a potential conflict, the
public has the same right to know
and the same disclosure rules apply.
When a public official is uncer-
tain whether he or she has an
actual or potential conflict of inter-
est, he or she should consult with
the agency's legal counsel, as well
as his or her own legal counsel.
The regulations mandating disclo-
sure state that the official must
comply with the disclosure require-
ments. The official's own counsel
should advise on the nature of the
conflict of interest and the requisite
disclosure in order to avoid a viola-
tion of the Act. However, the agen-
cy must ensure that (1) a complete
disclosure is made before the time of
its decision, and (2) its minutes
reflect the Disclosure set forth above,
otherwise it may face a legal chal-
lenge that could render its action
invalid.
H you would like a copy of the
Brea Redevelopment Agency deci-
sion, or if you have any questions
about the case or the Political Re-
formAct, please contact Julie Ashby
or Greg Moser in our San Diego
office, or the member of the firm
who normally handles your legal
matters.
0 1997 Foley Lardner Weissburg & Aronson. Reproduction with attribution permitted.
-~ 'i -~ i~
:5' u Ol~
~ ~
,...., .. 1r= Q--::.
~
g~ :. ---
c i~
U)
l~ ~~ 0
G> • E ~ as z • --L
Reclaimed
Waste Water
May Ease
State's Thirst
• Recycling: Despite
'yuck' factor, the practice is
on the rise. San Diego is at
cutting edge of what
backers see as wave of
future: sending treated
sewage back to the tap.
By JILL LEOVY
TIMES STAFF WRITER
In an effort to help quench
California's unending thirst, offi-
cials are set to embark on unusual
plans to turn treated sewage into
drinking water.
San Diego is preparing to pipe
water from the local sewage treat-
ment plant directly into the city's
second-largest drinking water res-
ervoir.
Communities. in the South Bay
and Livermore, Calif., have re-
cently joined the Orange County
Water District in approving the
injection of treated waste water
into underground supplies used for tap water.
Water recovered from treated
sewage has already become an
integral part of the state's water
supply. Despite high costs and
worries over public squeamishness,
the use of "recycled" water has
increased about 30% in the last
year.
It is being used to make snow for
ski areas, grow hay, make news-
print and concrete, dye carpets,
hose down landfills arid flll cooling
towers in oil refineries.
Water reclamation in some form
has been going on for a long time.
Irvine is the granddaddy of recla-
mation in California, setting an as
yet unrealized goal in the early
1960s of recycling all its sewage
water for non-potable uses. The
Irvine Ranch Water District is still
a leader, recently introducing re-
claimed water to office air-
conditioning systems.
In another innovation, the dis-
trict recently created a special
plumbing system that supplies re-
cycled water to toilets and urinals
in a 20-story lrvirie office tower .
Irvine water officials also in-
stalled an underground irrigation
system at an elementary school
playground that allows reclaimed
water to be used. The system
irrigates the grass but does not
send any water to the surface,
where it could come in contact
with children.
The Orange County Water Dis-.
trict is now considering plans to
expand its reclamation operation
using treated waste water from the
county's sanitation districts.
The widespread use of waste
water is not without doubters. En-
vironmentalists and Newport
Beach residents are fighting plans
by Irvine Ranch to flush treated
water through the San Joaquin
Marsh and into Upper Newport
Bay. Opponents fear the treated
sewage will foul· the bay, a fear
water officials say is groundless.
Pleue see WATER, Al8 ·
..
) -.~ t~
4
CD 1ii 0
g
co ~
c 0
1J "'
.. !. ~ -0
CD E as z
LOS ANGELES TIMES
WATER
Continued from A18
The city conducted focus groups
to test monikers for the water, and
ultimately chose "repurifted" over
"recycled,'' which, it seems, left too
much to the imagination.
0 utreach to community groups
came next, with officials gin-
gerly pointing out that the city's
existing water source, drawn from
the Colorado River, contains sewage
that has been treated and dis-'
charged by cities upriver, such as
Las Vegas.
Across the state, similar public
relations efforts are underway, with
water agencies gently seeking to tell
the public that they are using a new
source of water that's quite close to
home.
"All water has gone through
countless other organisms before it
gets to us,'' said Hartling. "Dino-
saurs, fish, humans-some a lot
more recently than we would like to
think."
"It's a delicate balance,'' said
· Steve Kasower, water recycling
specialist with the state Water Re-
sources Board. "It's important the
public understands this and doesn't
get upset by fear-mongers ....
But, dirty or clean, water is just
molecules of Hp with stuff floating
between them.
Public acceptance for water recy-
cling is not without precedent
I n Northern Virginia, a sewage
utility has been treating waste
water so that it meets drinking
water standards for 20 years and
releasing it into the Occoquan Res-
ervoir in an unusual project similar
to what San Diego plans. No health
problems have been reported.
At the most ad11anced sewage
treatment facilities today, utilities
empl:>y reverse osmosis and micro-
filters, devices that involve pressing
water through microscopic mem-
branes, similar to what is used at
bottled water companies such as
Arrowhead Water.
Elsewhere in the state, environ-
mental regulation has also spurred ·
new efforts at reclamation.
San Jose is one example. The city
is under pressure to reduce the
sewage it dumps into South San
Francisco Bay, not because the
discharge is poisoning anything, but
because it is so high quality that it is
converting natural saltwater
marshes into freshwater ones.
"In effect, the water is too clean,''
said Steven Ritchie of the San
Francisco Public Utilities Commis-
-sion.
With bullrushes springing up in
the bay where pickleweed
once grew, and pressure mounting
to do something to help endangered
saltwater species, it was only a
matter of time before cities like San
Jose came to view their sewage as
an enticing supply of freshwater,
Ritchie said
San Jose now has a $140-million
reclamation system under construc-
tion that will deliver reclaimed wa-
ter to parks, farms and industries in
Silicon Valley, said Garcia, the city's
environmental services director.
Some areas are even using .re-
claimed sewage water to upgrade
the purity of their conventional
water supplies.
Monterey Regional Water Pollu-
tion Control Agency will unveil a
$75-million project next month that
will free farmers from dependence
on wells that have grown too salty.
Since statewide more than three-
quarters of urban water is used for
things other than drinking, the most
optimistic activists predict that
someday 20%, or even 40%. would
come from treated waste.
"Toilet to.tap" is the phrase that
they use to denote a futuristic
urban environment in which treated
waste water would be transferred
directly to drinking water pipes.
Such a system would require new
technology to instantaneously de-
tect germs in treated water. But
some reclamation enthusiasts still
see it as inevitable.
The very thought seems to make
Spath, of the state health depart-
ment, uncomfortable. "The time for
that is not now, I will tell you that,"
he said
Even the strongest advocates
sense that the quick turnover of
water from sewers to faucets may
be a bit too dicey to win wide public
acceptance.
"I forbid you to print this," said
Orange County reclamation advo-
cate and farmer Charles Peltzer,
while expounding ideas for mixing
reclaimed water into public drinking
water. "The public isn't ready to
hear it."
Already, one water recycling plan
has run afoul of the public: 'fhrEte
years ago, the Upper San Gabriel
Valley Municipal Water District was
forced to scale back a plan to
replenish ground water with recy-
cled water because Miller Brewing
Co. voiced fears that the project
might taint its nearby wells.
Other attempts to gauge public
reaction have shown conflicting re-
sults. A few years ago in Denver,
water agency officials conducted
focus groups to find out how the
public might feel about reusing
waste water for drinking. They
found to their surprise that many
people would rather not think too
much about where their water
comes from. "They wanted us to just
get on with it," said Jane Earle, of
D?nver Water.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Section Page Date Subject
ler '1ed ,,,,,,.;,r:H
WATER: Use of Treated Sewage on Rise in State
Continued from Al
In a larger sense, critics say that
the process is expensive and may
make many water drinkers opt for
the bottled variety or turn up their
noses and say, "Yuckl"
But Paul Gagliardo of San Di-
ego's Metropolitan · Wastewater
Department believes that his city is
about to begin "pioneering a proc-
ess . . . to get people comfortable
with the idea of drinking treated
sewage."
California spews enough sewage
into the ocean to meet a third to a
half of the state's urban water
needs, Gagliardo said.
He is among a small group of
zealots who dream of a future in
which Californians drink sewage,
processed to levels similar to bot-
tled water.
Those views are shared by cru-
saders such as Santa Rosa organic
farmer Lawrence Jaffe, who sells
vegetables nourished with recy-
cled water using the slogan, "Close
the loop," and Bahman Sheikh, a
San Francisco consultant who likes
to make the point by gulping down
a long, cool glass of tertiary efflu-
ent
"There is no reason to flush
toilets with pure water from Mono
Basin," Sheikh said.
The surge tn water recycling has
been propelled by improvements in
technology, regulatory changes
and a new crop of government
subsidies for reclamation systems.
Today, California uses more than
450,000 acre-feet of reclaimed wa-
ter annually. That is equal to about
one-and-a-half Castaic Lakes, or
the water consumed by two-thirds
of Los Angeles In a year.
decided to convert waste into drink-
ing water after court rulings forced
the city to better treat its sewage to
protect the ocean. The result is
water similar to what most people
would consider good for a swimming
lake.
Rather than dump that water
back into the ocean, San Diego has
designed a $150-million system to
add another level of treatment,
bring the water up to the quality of
extra-pure tap water, and pump it to
the city's San Vicente drinking
water reservoir.
The water will be mixed into
imported water supplies, comprising
up to 10% of the s.upply by 2001.
"It's a very significant step," said
Ken Weinberg, water resources
supervisor for the San Diego
County Water Authority. "We are
creating a new source of water."
The technology for recycled wa-
ter has developed to where San
Diego's water will supposedly be 10
times purer than tap water, Gagliar-
do said.
State health officials have already
approved San Diego's plan, develop-
ing a new set of guidelines for the
purpose because none exist. The
water will be fine to drink, they say.
The only worry is breakdowns in
the system, so duplicate safeguards
have been built in, Spath said.
So far, lhe project has been more
controversial because of its high cost
than because of health concerns.
San Diego officials estimate that it
will cost about $600 per acre-foot
to produce drinking water from
waslc waler, about 30% higher than
the cost of purchasing water from
the Metropolitan Water District.
They acknowledge that figure is
fuzzy, however, because it includes
federal subsidies and is counted
against current sewage treatment
costs.
And some San Diegans contend
that it would be better spent on
developing other water sources: "If
you are willing to spend that kind of
money, you could flood the city of
San Diego," said Elmer Keen, a
retired geographer and critic of the
project.
But supporters counter that the
cost of recycled water, although
expensive, is still far less than the
cost of desalinating water or build-
ing dams. "It's competitive in .my
book when compared to other new
sources," said Peter MacLaggan,
executive director of the Water
Reuse Assn. of California
San Diego officials are keenly
aware of how easily public percep-,
lion of the project could go awry.
"This issue," said one advocate, Dr.
Rosemarie Marshall Johnson, "gets
everybody in a very personal way."
Please see WATER, Al9
~
(..) -cc I-C/'J -CIJ CC!' Zz 0--a.. I-a.. ~::i -(.) Zc: <w (/)a..
~~ Zw ::>~ Ow Oz w ~ z < cc
0
~ Jl ::J UJ ~
s ~
& as CL
c i UJ
.. !. as CL -0
CD E as z
Projects now under construction
will soon boost usage another
20%, according to the California
Water Resources Board. ·
For all that, reclaimed water is
less than 2% of the water used
yearly by farms and cities in Cali-
fornia.
But advocates predict that will
change, and cite models such as
Irvine Ranch, where nearly a
quarter of the water comes from
treated sewage.
"It's like throwing money away
if you just let this water go," said
Jaffe, who spent his law school
student loan to start an organic
farm in the shadow of San Jose's
treatment plant. where he grows
vegetables using local compost and
reclaimed water.
People such as Jaffe are fond of
pointing out that while the state's
reliance on water from the Sierra
Nevada and the Colorado River is
coming under attack, recycled wa-
ter is the one s'lurce in California
that is growing.
It is also drought-proof.
And because reclaimed water is
produced locally by cities, it is also
largely politics-proof. "No one can
take it away from us," said Earle
Hartling, water reuse coordinator of
the Sanitation Districts of Los An-
geles.
As a result, the uses of reclaimed
water have multiplied so quickly
that health officials have been
scrambling to keep up. New regu-
lations should be completed this
year, said David Spath. chief of the
division of drinking water with the
state Department of Health Serv-
ices.
The rules are expected to soon
eliminate one of the ironies of this
emerging water supply: its classifi-
cation as a hazardous waste.
Until then, plant workers must fill
out lengthy reports when they spill
reclaimed water, even if it is drink-
ing water quality.
Despite the regulatory confusion,
recycled water is being used in a
number of ways.
It has been proposed as a source of
water to do laundry at San Quentin
Prison. It is even being pumped
under the sea floor {Jff Long Beach
to keep the harbor area from sinking
due to oil extraction. The oil compa-
nies have used tap water for this
purpose-enough to supply 20,000
people With water for a year-but
are switching to reclaimed water.
-:.-
Throughout the state, independ-I
ent sewer and water utilities are
cooperating, and in the case of San
Francisco, merging. Th~ir engineers
are taking on dual roles, and con-
verting acre-feet-the conventional
measure of drinking water-to gal-
lons per day-the conventional
measure of sewage.
In short, water agencies now see
waste water as a resource and
incorporate it into long-term supply
plans.
Once chiefly an issue of handling
sewage, reclaimed water is 11moving
over to the other side of the ledger,"
said Lou Garcia, director of environ-
mental services for San Jose, which
plans to divert nearly 40% of its
sewage stream to water supplies in
coming years.
The West Basin Municipal Water
District, which serves communities
from West Hollywood to Palos Ver-
des ~tes. has made water recy-
cling the linchpin of its plan to cut
dependence on imported water in
half over the next 20 years, largely
by converting the region's water-
hungry oil refineries to recycled
water.
The purest of West Basin's recy-
cled water is being injected into the
ground to protect drinking water
supplies from seeping seawater. The
plan will simultaneously cut sewage
discharge into the bay 25%.
San Diego leads the state. Officials
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Section Page Date Subject
L. I/. ---A ;ti 8/ts/11 'lei~·',~~°' 1,·me.s -LOS ANGELES TIMES
•
Pensioris Should Be Based on Bonuses Too,Justices Rule
• Retirement: State Supreme Court decision in
Ventura County c~ could increase payments up to 20%
for employees who received extra pay for special skills.
From Associated Prm
SAN FRANCISCO-Thou-
sands of county employees in
California are entitled to higher
pensions based on bonuses that
they are paid for such things as
education and special skills, the
state Supreme Court ruled
Thursday.
The unanimous ruling, in a Ven-
tura County case, coul<l increase
individual pensions 10% to 20% in
some cases, said Stephen H. Silver,
lawyer for the 700-member
Deputy Sheriffs Assn .• which filed
the lawsuit.
The case will cost the county
millions of dollars and affect future
negotiations.over worker benefits,
·.· ' .
because 11every benefit that is
granted will be more expensive,"
said Assistant County Counsel
Dennis Slivinski. He said the
county has more than 5,000 em-
ployees, not all of whom get the
range of bonuses provided to sher-
ifrs deputies.
The ruling applies to the 20
counties covered by. the County
·Employees Retirement Law of
1937. A list was not immediately
available, but Silver said Los An-
geles County and most other
Southern California counties were
covered. Most of the state's other
38 counties are part of the Public
Employees Retirement System,
which already provides similar
benefits. .
The court said the Ventura
County deputies were entitled to
increased current or future pen-
sions, but did not decide whether
the other 19 counties would have to
.raise the pensions they have al-
ready calculated or would be af-
fected only in the future.
The pensions are determined
by taking an employee's highest
annual compensation and using a
percentage that depends on re-
tirement age and years of serv-
ice. The issue in the case was
whether the compensation in-
cluded bonuses paid to some em-
The deputies in the case re-
ceived .extra pay for bilingual
skills, uniform maintenance, rid-
ing motorcycles, working as
training officers, and for some
holiday and vacation periods for
which they chose cash Instead of
time off.
ployees. ·
A Superior Court judge and the
2nd District Court of Appeal ruled
that those sums were not included
in compensation for pension pµr-
poses. They relied on a 1983 appel-
late ruling that said compensation
was the amount paid to all em-
ployees in the same job. But the
FRIDAY.AUGUST 15.1997 A21 .,~
state's high court said the 1983
ruling was wrong.
Compensation is .. the average
monthly pay, excluding overtime,
received by the retiring em-
ployee," sa~d the opinion by Jus-
tice Marvin Baxter. He said it
includes additional pay for spe-
cial skills, experience and the
other bonuses received by the
deputies.
In a partial setback for the
employees, the court said the
county's contribution to a
deferred-compensation plan is
not included in the pay level
on which the pension is based.
But Silver and Slivlnski said ·
those amounts were much iess
I
than the benefits awarded in the!
ruling.
.. The public policy question ls..
to what extent retirement ben-
efits should be equivalent to ac-·
tual salary-." said Sllvinski, the:
county's lawyer. ..It's been the:
interpretation of the (county) re-.
tirement board since (the 1983!
ruling) that retirement ls not.
supposed to include all the cash·
compensation that an employee
receives. This opinion radic.ally1
changes that."
That is a fair result, said Silver,,
because "the whole Idea of a pen-
sion is to maintain to a certain
extent. what you're accustomed to
live on."
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Section
L. a. Times
Date Page Subject
1l13l'li Joi~ di~(' (t!.ea.J.0n
~ -................ £
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
Mayor Is Reelected
to Sanitation Post
Mayor John J. Collins recently
was reelected joint chairman of
the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County.
The districts serve 2.2 million
Orange County residents with
two treatment and disposal
plants in Fountain Valley and
Huntington Beach.
A combined body of the
county's nine sanitation boards
operate the districts. Twenty-
nine members from each of the
boards meet regularly to discuss
issues that affect the boards and
county as a whole.
A seven-year member, Collins
represents District 2, which in-
cludes Fountain Valley and Hun-
tington Beach.
-JOHN CAN ALIS
CF.NARO MOLINA I Los Angeles Times
Royden Eu and Jack Hsu hold their catch of the day from Santa Monica Bay, which this year is filled with game fish. .
More Fish, Cleaner Water .. . ,
In Santa Monica Bay, 'Life Is Good'
By ALAN ABRAHAMSON
TIMES STAFF WRITER
Chugging out of the Redondo Beach harbor well before
dawn. the Sea Spray. 65 feet long. was packed to the
gills with people chattering in intense excitement. Their
wish: fish. The dish: the best "bite" in years in Santa
Monica Bay.
As the sturdy craft lumbered along. the huge industrial
landmarks dotting the bay receded into the distance: the
Hyperion sewage treatment facility, the Chevron refinery.
the Southern California Edison generating plants.
Skipper Jeff De Buys steered to one of his favorite spots
and dropped anchor. Nearly 50 fishing lines shot out into
the sparkling green sea. Zing! Nol even two minutes later.
Jack Hsu. a 36-year-old Hacienda Heights engineer,
roared oul a primitive battle cry as silvery line whizzed
from his pole.
The fish fought gamely. But Hsu reeled it in, a fat.
15-pound yellowtail, and shouted with glee: "Sashimi!"
Santa Monica Bay is swimming this year with fish,
particularly with exotic game fish such as barracuda.
dorado. bonita, bluefin tuna and yellowtail.
Experienced anglers say the fishing is the best in at least
15 years. Some proclaim it's the best in a generation or
more. "It's just been phenomenal." said Philip Friedman.
·~ w~o runs the Torrance-based 976-TUN A fishing hotline.
T he arrival of so many game fish in the bay is clearly an
oceanographic anomaly tied to the condition known as
El Nino. experts said. Yet the fish have stayed-a clear
sign that the bay water is clean enough and there is
enough food. primarily baitfish such as sardines, to keep
them here.
For those who still consider the bay a cesspool. who
wouldn't even on a dare eat a fish taken from it. experts
Please see BAY, B3
' ,
' ,\
' i '
1.
· .....
BAY: 'Bite' Called the Best in Years
Continued from Bl
say water conditions have improved over the last
decade.
"From the standpoint of marine life in the bay,
conditions are markedly improved," said Mark
Gold, executive director of Heal the Bay, the Santa
Monica-based environmental group.
Yet environmentalists, inarine biologists and
veteran dockhands caution that considerable work·
remains, primarily protection from storm-drain
run-off and the cleanup of historical accumulations
underwater of the pesticide DDT. .
Unlike bottom-feeding f1Sh that may pick at
DDT-laden sediment and are decidedly off limits
for dinner-for instance, the white croaker-game
fish prey on smaller fish, not off the bottom. ..
They are treats to eat, said Gold and others.
"If anyone wants to drop any by at my house, I'd
be glad to give them my address," Gold . said.
.0 Luckily, some of my friends have been dropping
off some yellowtail."
A long with nature, which has provided warmer
water, grand-scale cleanup and protection
programs have meant cleaner water in the bay,
experts said. ·In addition, sportfishing has been
enhanced-for some species-by the absence since
1994 of gill-net fishing in near-coast waters.
Among the massive cleanup efforts: the Santa
Monica Bay Restoration Project, approved in 1995.
As part of the project, rules took effect last year
that are designed to reduce the county's largest
source of p(>llution, the toxic muck-pesticides,
grease, oil and waste-that spills into storm drains.
At the same time, a campaign was launched to
educate the public about the dangers of dumping
into drains. ·
This summer, the water in the bay has been
cleaner in part because last year's dry winter
meant less gunk ran out of storm drains. .
However, the rains yet to come this winter will
wash a toxic soup into the water, making the water
quality hazardous and beaches "look like a land-
. fill,'' Gold said.
But, in the water, the ha?.ard is temporary, he
and others said. ·
"Pollution is not keeping the [game fish] out of
the bay,'' said Dan Pondella. an Occidental College
marine biologist · and director of the Vantuna
Research Group, which has monitored fJSh popula-
tions iil the bay since the 1970s.
Toxicity, he and others said, is typically evident
in underwater sediment and in bottom-feeding fish
such as the white croaker, also known as the
kingfish.
, hard for some environmentalists, scientists and
fishers to convince others that the bay is actually
showing signs of health.
According to the county's Department of Health
Services, there were 12 beach closures in 1987; so
far in 1997, there have been only two, and one of
those, ori Jan. 30, was due not to the typical cause, a
sewage ·pumping station malfunction, but to a
landslide that caused a break in a sewer line.
Another sign: Toxic metals discharges from local
waste water treatment plants, including the Hy-
perio~ plant, decreased 80% to 90% ·from 1982 to ·
1994, according to the Restoration Project and the
·Westminster-based Southern California Coastal
'.Waters Research Project
Other signs include significant kelp growth in
. test beds and a resurgence in the bay's resident sea
lion population, from about 150 animals a decade
ago to more than 700, said Terry Tamminen, who
runs the environmental group Santa Monica Bay-
Ke'eper.
· Tamminen, like many others, emphasized that
, much work remains. However, he said, "there is
· evidence that things are getting better."
Karen Caesar, a Restoration Project spokes-
woman, added: "There is more than just a glimmer
of hope for the bay." .
For instance, the .. bite,'' as anglers call it, began
in earnest in the spring. There has been almost no
letup since.
The fISh arrived from Mexico, driven north by a
complex mix of climate and ocean forces tied to a
potent El Nino in the equ;ltorial Pacific, said Tim
Barnett, a researcher at the Scripps Institution of
Oceanography in La Joll~
I n June, the Easy Reader, a weekly newspaper in
the South Bay, began reporting big fish hauls
from the Redondo pier. Last month, the tales
· became . whoppers: One boat captain, the paper
reported, gleefully "worked overtime to filet one of
the 162 yellowtail" caught that day. .
"It's like they say it was in the 1930s," said Eric
Hobday, 31, the Sea Spray's veteran deckhand.
"The bass are biting. The yellowtail are biting. The
barracuda-biting."
Bill Beebe, 70, who has been writing outdoors
columns for area newspapers for 45 years, said it's
not quite like it used to be in the old days-though
he did say that it is "better than it has been."
Beebe said he recalls fJShing 50. years ago for
· halibut in the morning, then albacore tuna in the
afternoon. Forty years ago, he said, he could catch ·
100 or more white sea bass in a single nighl
"I can tell you, this doesn't hold a candle to that,"
he said. Commercial catch of the white croaker has been Nonetheless, it's pretty dam good. One day's
illegal since 1990 in the near-shore waters of catch on the Sea Spray totaled 26 yellowtail, 57
the Palos Verdes shelf, where about 100 tons of barracuda, 35 bass and 11 bonita. "We caught 26
DDT sprawls across an area roughly the size of the but we probably lost 50," skipper DeBuys said.
city of Pasadena. "Fish running into rocks. Wily fish."
In June, a study released by Heal the Bay found As the boat rocked in the harbor, deckhand
that contaminated white croaker was sWl for sale Hobday cleaned Hsu's decidedly unwily fish, then
in Los Angeles and Orange County markets; 84% the nine that Hsu's buddy, Royden Eu, 34, a
of 132 samples exceeded the amount of DDT that · Rowland Heights stockbroker, had reeled in-four
state health officials say poses an acceptable cancer yellowtail, two barracuda, two bonita and a bass.
risk .. The worst of the fJSh were too polluted to be Soy sauce and wasabi for the yellowtail, green
. used legally as landfill. ,., onions and a steaming pot for the other fish, Eu
Most of the white croaker were probably caught proclaimed.
off the Palos Verdes shelf or Los Angeles Harbor in "Life is good!" someone called out from the
or near the state's "no-take" wne. Releasing the docks.
report, Gold said the rule is poorly enforced. Hsu responded with a thumbs-up sign and a big
It's that kind of horror story that makes it so smile. He said, "Very good! Very good fish!"
.
I •
The Bay Is His
Baby, and He's a
Fierce Guardian
By JOHN M. GLIONNA
TIMES STAFF WRITER
Rimm Fay rises with the fishes.
By dawn most mornings. he a lready has a couple of
cups of coffee down his gullet as he shoves off in his
24-foot trawler, preparing for yet another exploratory dive
beneath his beloved and beleaguered Santa Monica Bay.
For decades it has been this way: a sometimes stubborn,
always idealistic marine biologist continuing his life of
intimate contact with the sea. Four times a week. the
68-year-old Fay dons his scuba gear to wander the ocean
floor off the Malibu coast, harvesting marine specimens for
biomedical laboratories around the world.
Since the 1950s. his Pacific Bio-Marine Labs has sent
lobsters to Australia, South Korea and Japan. He has sent
horn sharks caught by hand to a Minnesota zoological
park. starfish to Columbia and Harvard. and sea urchins to
CLARENCE WILLIAMS I Los Angeles 'J'lmes
Rimm Fay is a curious mix of scientist and gadfly,
fisherman and no-nonsense environmentalist.
Santa Monica College so students could study their
evolution.
His specimens have been used to study human nerve
cell damage as well as to develop weapons against various
tumors and to concoct a nonaddictive pain reliever
stronger than morphine.
Fay, a Santa Monica native and former state coastal
Please see FAY, B3
t' r I· ;
FAY: Determined Defender of the Bay
Continued from 81
commissioner, knows the contributions his marine
creatures are making to mankind. But he questions
what favors man has done them and their ecosys-
tem in return. Despite some signs in recent years of
improvementin the health of the bay, he remains a
prodding voice against what he sees as mistreat-.
ment of the waters.
"They've dumped everything in this bay except
radioactive waste," he complains.
To meet Rimmon Fay is to see a crusty old·sailor
whose ruddy skin and reddened eyes suggest
someone who has logged too many sea miles under
the sun. He's a curious mix of scientist and gadfly,
f1Sherrnan and no-nonsense environmentalist.
For years, he bas carried his love for the
California coast like Don Quixote's lance and shield.
To local f1Shernien, fellow biologists, develOpers
and politicians, he's an unapologetic guardian of
the bay. Others see him as merely a crotchety
dreamer and a fool, a man who exaggerates the
plight of the bay, or as one city official put it, "a
well-meaning eccentric." ·
Other envirQnmentalists are more heartened by
the progress in cleaning up the bay.
"The bay in a lot of areas, like 'storrn~drain
. ·pollution, still has major problems,'' said Mark
Gold, an environmental scientist and head of Santa
Monica-based Heal the Bay. "But we have made
remarkable progress in the last 10 to 20 years in
pollutant reduction from sewage treatment plants
and from industrial waste sources."
Don't try telling that to Fay. In conversations, he
lunges irrepressibly at windmills. Big industrial
polluters, government sanitation departments, the
Environmental Protection Agency, even the Coastal
Commission on which he once served-all of them.
he complains, have failed to protect his bay.
Fay gets an audience for these convictions
because he has spent as much time on the bottom of
Santa Monica Bay as anyone. A former lifeguard,
he began diving Qff Malibu in 1955, collecting
specimens for professors at UCLA and USC, where
he did his postdoctoral research attempting to find
the cause of death and mutation of great quantities
of marine life in the bay. ;
Forty years ago, Fay's bay was polluted. Today,·
he stands along the docks of Marina del Rey
and looks down. "This isn't tropical water," he
says. "It's Santa Monica Bay water-off-color, sort
of brownish. There's suspended matter in il"
It embitters him that Los Angeles is better
known as an industrial county than a great fishing
port. He recalls ruefully how, in the 19308, heavy
industry began discharging hundreds of pounds of
effiuent a day into the sewer lines that emptied into
the bay. Bow harmful chemicals, including DDT,
killed off f1Sh, spoiling a vibrant industry. How the
cause of the poisoning was finally traced to a
Montrose chemical plant in the late 1960s, a time
when DDT concentrations in Santa Monica Bay f1Sh
had grown so high the fISh could not be exported.
"As far as anyone is concerned, the ocean is here
for our amusement and recreation, not sustaining
life. It's not important to people. But to me, it's my
life," Fay says.
He contends that drawing-board projects like
the Playa Vista housing and studio mega-develop-
ment near Marina del Rey would mean an
avalanche of fresh-water runoff into the bay's
fragile salt water habitats. Some other environ-
mentalists are also concerned, but are withholding
their judgment until.the developer's final plans are
in.
John Crosse, assistant director of the ~
Angeles city bureau of sanitation, takes issue with
Fay's charges of government irresponsibility.
"Our marine biologists think the bay is recover-
ing · quite well as to where we were in ·the
mid-1980s," he said "Back then, we were dis-·
charging fiye times as ·much waste. There were
. impacts to marine life around our outfalls.
"We cleaned up our act in 1989 and have made
some dramatic improvements to the ocean bottom
around our outfalls,'' lte said. "We've been meeting
Environmental Protection Agency standards for
treated waste since 1989 and don't see any
long-term damage to the health of Santa Monica
Bay." . . -:
Fay's battle involves not just the bay, but also
the diminishing coastal wetlands suc'1 as the
Ballona Wetlands below the Westchester bluffs.
f.
>
f
. Nearly gone, he says, are the flat shallow marshes
around Santa Monica Bay that provide a healthy
habitat for baby fish and migrating birds along the ~
coastal flyway. · '
These were the issues Fay championed during t
his six years as a coastal commissioner, until he .1. . was replaced by .a developer in 1979 after state
legislators decided that he had antagonized too
· many people.
"I let people know [that] the most important use t
of our ocean, other than development, always has i
13een and always will be the receipt of our waste. · ,.
Waste compromises all other uses. And that's what !:
they called offending people," Fay says. ~
· After his Coastal Commission stint ended, Fay ;.
largely washed his hands of politics and returned to
the sea, harvesting specimens and providing his ·
PXpertise to environmental causes where needed.
But he continues to attend meetings on water ·
quality control and to weigh in with his opinions-
and continues to be frustrated at his difficulty in
· turning people's attention to pollution. · ·
"When it comes to talking about this bay, I might
as well be mute and people might as well be deaf
and dumb, especially 1>9liticians,'' he says.
Dan Frumkes, director of the conservation
network for the American Sports Fishing Assn.,
sees Fay as a rare antidote to people who are "only
.concerned about what they can see-birds and
mammals. Everything else is out of sight, out of
mind. But Rimm has made a life of making them·
look at the sea, to see how we've been mismanag-
ing and over-exploiting." ·
Adds Dorothy Green, founder of Heal the Bay:
"Rimm is one of my favorite characters, someone
right out of Steinbeck's •eannery Row.' He feels it's
his ocean you're messing with."
And being on that water is Fay's therapy, where
he finds solitude and peace. He can't conceive of
hanging up his scuba gear. ·
"I can't retire," he says. "There's too much I
have to do."
Public Banned at Scehlc Waterway
in Marylai;id as Fish Kill Pers~ts . ( -.--.. . .
From the W,ashington Post
SHELLTOWN, Md.-As a mas-
sive fISh kill continued in the
Pocomoke River on Maryland's
Eastern Shore on Thursday, offi-
cials indefinitely banned the public
from a nearly five-mile stretch of
the scenic waterway.
The state Department of Natural
Resources sent a team of scientists
to the Pocomoke, where they
gathered water, mud and flSh sam-
ples for analysis. .
The fish kill, which began
Wednesday, destroyed thousands
of menhaden, roekfish, croakers
and blue crabs and marked a
dramatic escalation of problems on
the Pocomoke that began last fall,
when local watermen began re-
porting gaping red sores on fISh.
Officials . have not determined
the cause of the fish lesions but are
following procedures developed by
North Carolina researchers to test
for Pfiesteria piscicida, an obscure
microorganism that eventually was
pinpointed as the cause of massive
fish kills in that state.
With ·water samples taken
Wednesday from the Pocomoke,
. officials said they hope to have
some preliminary indications by
today whether Pfiesteria is respon-
sible for the lesions and the dead
fJSh. :
After conferring with·~ state
health and environment officials,
Somerset County Health Qfficer
Curtis Dickson cfosed the Poco-
moke River because of a potential
health threat to humans and be-
cause people were not heeding the
advisory to stay away from the
water. ·
Pfiesteria, a single-·cell ·micro-
organism, moves through 2• stages
and is harmful to fish .in several of
those stages. Scientists don't fully
understand how Pfiesteria in an
. unharmful state becomes danger-
ous, but they know that it thrives
in water polluted with nutrients,
such as nitrogen, which can wash
off farm fields or be emitted by
sewage-treatment plants.
9-P-Y'7
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Section Page. Date Subject
/ 5 1/2~{17
Huntington Beach holds .offon sewer maintenance fee . . \ . . ~
• City officials decid~ to ·
investigate the proposal .i'-
and form a task force for ·
resident ~put.: : ·; ·. ~ .. :
By Tim Grenda, Independent
HUNTINGTON BEACH -
City officials have ·dropped the;•.
idea of charging residents a ... :
monthly fee to pay for j.mprove:,
ments ,to the city's µumbllng · ... ~
sewer system -at least for the
near future. . · ·
Two weeks ago, City ·, ... , ·.: ..
Administrator Mike Uberuaga
proposed instituting a new
Sewer Maintenance Fee '.
Program that would collect
between $3.39 and $7.36 a
month from every property ··
owner in the city. '· ·.' -1
The amount of the fee,· ·· 1·· ·
which would be the same for ·
everyone, would depend on .. ,-.
how much of the multi-million :
dollar problem officials wan~ to \
fix. A tee of $3.39 would raise· ·-
enough money to covf!r only · .....
some of the repairs, while_the.,!i'
maximum charge of $7.36 .(.:-.
would mean officials"could : ·
mend most of the city's sewer •
problems.
City staff had recommended
implementing the $3.39 per ·
month fee. , ·
' • I •
input on how best to structure
such a program. .
"I most certainly support the
: sewer fee,• Uberuaga said.
"But the reason I changed my
recommendation is the irnpor-· ··
tance of the public supporting ·
. the tee . ." .1 ·• , .. ; .• , . . . , . ,_.~ ... BefQre ariy sewe~' mainte:;:,'.·~.,
: nance fee j.s imposed, the City
; CoUlldl agreed to form a task ·
> ~t.."'*l.lt.:u.~~-· force comprised 'of representa-:';
. ·i~t.abo~t ·~~iY~"u~:;~~! .. ,'., ·good.1de6ut'il~.'5U~g~t~'.ii~~; : :;:~P~f ;:~r;:~~=~::'Point-.
that the city's infras~cture --· the cotindl hold off1pn their ~;i;,.. ed by the council.
will be to design and imple-
ment a public awareness pro-
gram to inform residents of the
need for sewer improvements.
Officials hope once the public
knows the seriousness of the
problem, residents will be more
likely to liUpport paying a fee
for repairs.
Resident Ed Peierabend said
city officials better implement
some sort of remedy to fix the
sewers soon, before ·the entire
system "fails completely .
"Pretty soon,• Feierabend
said, •we'll have porta-potties. • including .miles of underground.: deciSion and first collect public .. The goal of the task force .....
sew!'!T lines, water PUI!lP sta,, '· L . . . ...J.. -----....,.,_,.,.,..,,__,==""""--------~~~---
tions and· storm drains -is in :
bad shape and literally crum~ J
.bling after decades of neglect.;
Huge breaks and cracks in ·
the sewers all over the city
allow untreated wastewater to"
pour rlght into the· ground, cre-
ating a serious public health
issue, officials said. .. .
Recently, the council saw ·
video of the extensive under-'
ground damage taken with a · ·.
remote-controlled camera that
city crews use ~o survey the
sewers .. :· ... ·
But cin Monday night, the·
council unanimously agreed to
table the idea and investigate
the issue some more.
Uberuaga said he still feels
the sewer fee program is a ·
,
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE
2.2-
:~:·· -.... , .. : .... --· ......... .
·World's· sanitatiOn · . . • .-:-~r,. seen as worsen1_,g . . ~ ........ . The New York Times . . . . · · ~ ....... ~. . ~·-·· UNITED NATIONS-Neariy 311il1r6fl
people -more than half the world's p~
ulation -do not have access to eve& a
minimally sanitary toilet, UNICEF sfli'1
in a report Tuesday, adding that tlii$
lack of basic hygiene contributes signifi::
cantly to the spread of new plagues,.tli~
resurgence of old diseases and -the
deaths of 2.2 million children a year) .t. :
Sanitation statistics are among thtise
getting worse woi'ldwide, said ·the·~
port. Since 1990, about 300 million pecijn~
have been added to populations witli'ol:'t-
sanitation. : ., · ' .. !ti":
UNICEF's annual Progress of NatibWi·
survey found that Brazil, Haiti, Camb~ ·
dia, China, India, Afghanistan, Egypt1, ~
Congo and Senegal are among the col.In-·
tries where less than half the population,
have acceptable sanitation. . ., •. ;. ••.••
Other countries have done much. bet.a:
·te.r, though not necessarily because. the~·
are richer. 'Among .the developing:iia.a·.
tions with standards equivalent to those~
of industrial couµtries are. Malaysia\·
Thailand, the Philippines, Iran, Jor<fan.t;
Saudi Arabia, Jamaica, Trinidad_4fl'd
Tobago, and nearly all of Central Ameritt•
ca except Nicaragua. · . ..~ .. ~
In a separate survey within the .Pm.·
· gress of.NJltions report, UNICEF tonf
eluded that' AIDS could wipe out mostt>f ·
the gains made in reducing infant·.anci
child mortality in the developing cdflfl-
tries in recent years. .:.:; ··-~ ·
SUBJECT
\
NAME OF PAPER
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
SECTION PAGE DATE SUBJECT
7 11 17
What America needs is a 3.5-gallon flush :I f you call yourself an Amer-~: ican, you need to know
about a crucial issue that is ~· now confronting the U.S. :r Congress (motto: "Re-
Jllaining Firmly In Office Since
p98"). This is an issue that af-
fects every American, regard-
,less of race or gender or religion
or briefs or boxers; this is an
issue that is fundamental to the
whole entire Cherished Ameri-
can Way of Life.
This issue is toilets.
~ I'm talking about the toilets
·now being manufactured for
·home use. They stink. Literally.
-You have to flush them two or
:three times to get the job done. It
has become very embarrassing
:to be a guest at a party in a newer
Jiome, because if you need to use
. the toilet, you then have to lurk in
tJle bathroom for what seems (to
you) like several presidential ad-
ministrations, flushing, check-
'ihg, waiting, flushing, checking,
while the other guests are whis-
·pering: "What is (your name)
'DOING in there? The laundry?"
'.': I know this because I live in a
home with three new toilets, and
I estimate that I spend 23 percent .~ my waking hours flushing
them. This is going on all over
f,merica, and it's causing a seri-
·ous loss in national productivity
that could really hurt us as we
try to compete in the global econ-
omy against nations such as Ja-
pan, where top commode scien-
-tists are developing super-effi-
cient, totally automated
household models so high-tech
that they make the space shuttle
look like a doorstop.
:· The weird thing is, the old
DAVE BARRY
American toilets flushed just
fine. So why did we change?
What force would cause an entire
nation to do something so stupid?
Here's a hint: It's the same force
that from time to time gets a bee
in its gigantic federal bonnet and
decides to spend millions of dol-
lars on some scheme to convert
us all to the metric system, or
give us all Swine Flu shots, or
outlaw tricycles, or whatever.
You guessed it! Our govern-
ment!
What happened was, in 1992,
Congress passed the Energy Pol-
icy and Conservation Act, which
declared that, to save water, all
U.S. consumer toilets would
henceforth use 1.6 gallons of wa-
ter per flush. That is WAY less
water than was used by the older
3.5-gallon models -the toilets
that made this nation great; the
toilets that our Founding Fathers
fought and died for -which are
now prohibited for new installa-
tions. The public was not consult-
ed about the toilet change, of
course; the public has to go to
work, so it never gets consulted
about anything going on in Wash-
ington.
But it's the public that has been
stuck with these new toilets,
which are saving water by re-
quiring everybody to flush them
enough times to drain Lake Erie
on an hourly basis. The new toi-
lets are so bad that there is now
-I am not making this up -a
black market in 3.5-gallon toi-
lets. People are sneaking them
into new homes, despite the fact
that the Energy Policy and Con-
servation Act provides for -I
am not making thi~ up, either -
a $2,500 fine for procuring and
installing an illegal toilet.
I checked this out with my lo-
cal plumber, who told me that
people are always asking him for
3.5-gallon toilets, but he refuses
to provide them, because of the
law. The irony is that I live in
Miami; you can buy drugs here
simply by opening your front
door and yelling: "Hey! I need
some crack!"
Here's another irony: The fed-
eral toilet law is administered by
the U.S. Department of Energy.
According to a Washington Post
article sent in by many alert
readers, the DOE recently had to
close several men's rooms in the
Forrestall Building because -I
am STILL not making this up -
overpressurized air in the
plumbing lines was CAUSING
URINALS TO EXPLODE.
That's correct: These people are
operating the Urinals of Death,
and they're threatening to fine us
if we procure working toilets.
The-public -and this is why I
love this nation -is not taking
this sitting down. There has been
a grass-roots campaign, led by
commode activists, to change
the toilet law, and a bill that
would do that (H.R. 859 -The
Plumbing Standards Act) has
been introduced in Congress by
Rep. Joe Knollenberg of Michi-
gan. I talked to Rep. Knollen-
berg's press secretary, Frank
Maisano, who told me that the
public response has been very
positive. But the bill has two
strikes against it:
1. It makes sense.
2. People want it.
These are huge liabilities in
Washington. The toilet bill will
probably face lengthy hearings
and organized opposition from
paid lobbyists; for all we know it
will get linked to Whitewater and
wind up being investigated by up
to four special prosecutors. So it
may not be passed in your life-
time. But I urge you to do what
you can. Write to your congress-
humans, and tell them you sup-
port Rep. Knollenberg's bill.
While you're at it, tell them you'd
like to see a constitutional
amendment stating that if any
federal agency has so much
spare time that it's regulating
toilets, that agency will immedi-
ately be eliminated, and its
buildings will used for some ac-
tivity that has some measurable
public benefit, such as laser tag.
So come on, America! This is
your chance to make a differ-
ence! Stand up to these morons!
Join the movement!
Speaking of which, I have to go
flush.
Dave Barry is a columnist for The Mi-
ami Herald. His column appears Sat-
urdays in Accent
nJESDA Y. JUL y 29. 1997 A3 R
!
Water Deal Spli!~ .:
San Joaquin VaileY ..
• Resources: MWD crafts plan for transfer from •
southern district to urban use. Northern farmers, fearing ..
effects on agriculture, join environmentalists in opposition~
ByMARKARAX
TIMES STAFF WRITER
ARVIN, Calif.-An elaborate
deal to move San Joaquin River
water from the farms of this heart-
land to t'te suburbs of Los Angeles
has eruJJt~d into California's ver-
sion of a nasty civil war.
It pits L.A.'s Metropolitan Water
District and big farmers in the
southern San Joaquin Valley on
one side against farming giants to
the north and Bay Area environ-
mentalists.
The south says the $45-million
water transfer is a win-win, ben-
efiting urban users in Southern
California and fruit and vegetable
growers in Kern County. The north
say.s it won't abide any deal that
allows a thirsty Southern Califor-
nia to tap into yet another distant
river vital to agriculture. It vows a
Jong legal fight
As · early as this week. federal
officials were set to approve the
transfer. shunting 350,000 acre-
feet of San Joaquin River water
over the mountains into Southern
California during the next 25
years-enough water to slake the
thirst of about 2.8 million people a
year.
Now the deal is on ice. perhaps
permanently, while farmers and
irrigation districts in the San Joa-
quin Valley try to work out a truce.
"Any time you propose a water
transfer, you expect some contro-
versy, but we frankly didn't antici-
pate the opposition that's now
coming at us." said Dirk Reed, the
MWD engineer who helped nego-
tiate the deal.
"They see Southern California
sitting here and they think we've
got an unquenchable thirst, and we
don't and that's what we're trying
to tell them."
Water transfers may be arcane
instruments, but they are vital to
Southern California's survival of
future droughts and an increased
population, according to MWD of-
ficials. The water agency serves 16
million people from Ventura to San
Diego and needs an additional
450,000 acre-feet by 2015 to meet a
projected increase of 4 million cus-
tomers. .
With Los Angeles losing much of
its Mono Lake water and its Colo-
rado River supply threatened by a
lawsuit, the region is naturally
ogling the abundant irrigation wa-
ter of the San Joaquin Valley.
Like many farmers opposing
water transfers. Kole Upton, a
cotton and nut grower in Madera
County, sees Los Angeles employ~
ing an old tactic to capture the
water of a faraway river: dividing
and conquering local farmers and
irrigation districts by playing to
the greed of a few.
In a recent opinion column in the
Fresno Bee, Upton all but accused
the Arvin-Edison Water Storage
District here of selling out to the·
big hydra in the 213 area code.
The ghost of the Owens Valley·
case-Los Angeles' turn-of-the-·
century water grab that milked dry:
the fruit orchards of a distant plain.
and turned a cabal of San Fernando
Valley developers into rich men-.
was not far away.
0 We're selling our future to L.A.,
because we're going to need this·
water for our farms and our own.
growing cities," Upton said. "This·
isn't a one-year transfer of surplus:
water. This is a 25-year commit-
ment."
In the five years since federal·
reform paved the way for water
marketing in California, only one
minor deal has sent additional San.
Please see WATER. A14 ·
t'
WATER: Deal for Transfer Divides SanJoaquin Valley
Continued from A3
Joaquin Valley farm water to
Southern California.
The last time MWD officials
knocked on the door of this distant
farm belt looking for water, they
managed to insult Callfomia's agri-
cultural giants and went home dry.
The year was 1994 and the MWD
had secretly inked a $5.6-million
deal with one hard-luck dairy near
Los Banos to buy 32,000 acre-feel
When the sale became public, it
generated so much heat from the
farming community that the trans-
fer never took place.
It didn't help matters that one of
the owners of the dairy-and the
MWD's chief negotiating partner-
was then-Assemblyman Rusty Ar-
eias from urban San Jose.
T
wo years later, MWD execu-
tives returned to this flaUand
still licking their wounds. · This
time, they bowed to all the rural
niceties. They said they took care
not to dangle millions of dollars in
front of some desperate fanner.
They dined at mom-and-pop res-
taurants in Arvin and Delano and
bartered long and hard with the
local big hats.
Rather than deal with Kem
County farmers directly, the MWD
decided it was better public rela-
tions to bargain upfront with the
Arvin-Edison Water Storage Dis-
trict. which delivers San Joaquin
River water to area farms.
Instead of planting a spigot di-
rectly into the river, the two sides
said they came up with an innova-
tive plan to bank enough water in
wet years to serve both the farm-
ing needs of Kem County and the
urban needs of Southern California.
With more than $20 million in
infrastructure funds from the ..
MWD, Arvin-Edison would con-
struct wells and percolaUon ponds
near Bakersfield that would store
thousands of acre-feet of river
water below ground. In dry years.
when its draw or San Joaquin
River water was cut, the irrigation·
district would then have plenty of
ground water to serve its carrot
and grape growers. And it would
have enough left over to ship an
average of 14,000 acre-feet a year
totheMWD.
Unlike the dairy farm deal, this
one wouldn't fallow any farmland,
according to Arvin-Edison offi-
cials. And the MWD, ever mindful
of its past mistakes, was careful to
let the irrigation districts that
share the river with Arvin-·Edison
know about the negotiations.
But just as the deal was headed
for Bureau of Reclamation ap-
proval, growers in Fresno and
Madera counties began mounting a
vitriolic opposition. How could our
brothers in the south valley sell
water to Los Angeles when we in
· the north are fallowing farmland in
dry years? How can we be sure
that the water you're sending
south is really surplus, banked
·water? If you want to pursue a
wet-year water banking system,
why not come to us :ind keep it in
the family?
"If Arvin had come to the group
and said we want to install millions
of dollars worth of percolation
basins for our future use, no one
would have a problem," said Dick
Moss of the Friant Water Users,
have long struggled with dry-year
cuts in their supply and that the
deal with the MWD would mean a
lot more certainty for farmers in
Kem County.
"We don't see this as chiefly a
Metropolitan program. This is an
Arvin program designed to regu-
late our erratic supply.'' he said.
Environmental groups have '
raised their own objections to the
water transfer in letters to federal
officials. They point out that the
San Joaquin River-part of Cali-
fornia's historic salmon run-has
been listed as one of the 10 most
abused rivers in America because
so much of its flow is now diverted
to agriculture. What water does
make it downstream is polluted by
pesticides and other farm runoff,
studies show.
"The San Joaquin River has
been devastated by water diver-
sions over the last 40 years," said
Hal Candee of the Natural Re-
sources Defense Council m San
Francisco. "Adding 16 million wa-
ter customers as additional divert-
ers before we've done anything to
address the river's environmental
needs is a terrible mistake."
which is made up of Arvin-Edison The war of words between
and two dozen other irrigation farming interests in the south
districts throughout the San Joa-and the north has sent the latter
quin Valley. into a rare embrace with environ-
"lt's only when the water goes mentalists. After weeks of recrimi-
out of the region that we begin to · nations, rival farmers and irriga-
have a problem." tion districts agreed last week to
Opponents fear that once the . stop writing opinion page pieces
MWD becomes a contracted user of and buying newspaper ads and to
the San Joaquin River, agricul-· sit down and talk.
ture's 98% draw of water will be In a show of good faith, Arvin-
forever jeopardized. In times of Edison withdrew the water trans-
drought, they point out, the needs fer from federal consideration. It
of cities supersede the needs of says fellow irrigators should either
farms. put up or shut up. If opponents
Steve Collup, head of Arvin--won't help the district finance a
Edison, believes that fear is greaUy similar water bank for Kern
overstated. He .says opponents County farmers, Arvin-Edison of-
have misrepresented the deal as a . ficials say, they will resubmit the
diversion of river water. ''The only MWD deal for Bureau of Reclama-
water we'll be sending to Los tion approval.
Angeles is water from conserva-That could provoke a lengthy
tion and banking. There is no net legal fight, pUWng on indefinite
loss." hold the water Southern California
. He said that district growers was counting on to sneak by in
1 future droughts.
"I'm not going to cast MW'
the evil villain. They're just tr
to get a job done for their cu:
ers,'' Moss said. "But our bo
line is we don't want San Jos
Valley water leaving the San
quin Valley."
..
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
NATION
WATCH:
Name of Paper
0. C. If(_,)
Where drinking water comes from ... a II .
URBAN
WATER
CYCLE
"''"w""'" . ~ rare commodity.
Water covers
more than 70%
Section
/l
Page
J
Subject
IJ II II
any remaining
~ i! ~ of the Earth's ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
surface, but less Where used water goes ...
than 1% of that m m
is readily
available for our
use. Here's how
water is cleaned
for use in the
home:
Source: National G•ographic Soci•ty;
Knight-Ridder Tribun•
Water is disinfected with
chlorine; chlorine is
removed; water is
recycled or discharged_
Into sea, rivers or onto·
the ground. ·
Sludge settles
and rs removed.
m
Remaining water is
sent to an aeration tank, where oxygen-
fed bacteria break
u~wastes.
m
In another settling
tank, smaller solids sink to the bottom and scum rises to the top.
Both are removed.
Gravel, seeds, etc ..
fall to bottom of a settling tank.
II
. Coarse screen
removes large solids, such as sticks, cans.
..... -~
The Earth's water .. (/ ~
~ . ,, . .. .. ,
Water-saving tips
... While waiting for tap •
water to warm up, save the
running water for o~ ~
. \ ··'. ' · ... Use a small plastic tub to::
rinse fruits, vegetables, : then use the water from
the tub to water plants. ..
... Turn off the water while
you brush your teeth, sha~;
or lat.her up in the sh~wert
"
' .
. .
Good management is· no-management.
. . . . 5.& /14L-<u> ~ ~1 · . . . -. J. ,, '· a, Ronald L V~~ ~ •• ' .. ...:.. . . . .. , ....... ~ -. 1. ·r ,.8 . .: ,.. ::: ::-~,-_. ~:~t·· . · ~Its time not addln1 value tor custom era .. · _will have simple, self.driven structures
.11•• ~caao ~rwn.:.,,r:" \"'il:V~1?~~~9rp~~ · BQ ·1• -~~ ... · . Because or this -and other nl!gatlvea ·and controls. . .
;. ··"Manail~k-Wltilgut MinLli&lent~-li~f" UI ·ti\~ .. ~ · · · .. ! . ~the so-ealled Golden Age pf manage-Controls? Yes, controls. The end or
sure to generate applause among the--._... ., REVIEW/'\'·.'·: . . .. · ment, which b~gan shortly after the management as we know It need '10t · lebelan masses wlio like to tack tho• . . . : · ~ . ....;.__ beginning or tlie Industrial revolution mean the end or control. ~heeky "Dilbert" eartoon• on walls of'' · · MANAGING~ MANAGEMENT, and peaked In the 1950s, will rapidly "The post-management corpdratlon their ~ompany eublcles. . •!·,. • ... . . • • . by Richard K~. , an Godden: Nlcholaa come to a close, the authors predict. will have authority and clear leader-: Its premise Is simple: Madagement as.· ·: . Brealav r.Ub~l~hfril,= .. · 8 pages. $25 What will replace all these redundant ship, but the control will be based on ..
we know It has become lirelevant; It has·: , . . '· .. •.-:. , managers? En~repreneurs, say the Internal motivation and on results, .
become an unnecessary and burilen· : Yea~; . ~ ''u t!lre probably saying. authors. Entrepreneurs who are part of rather th~n on external supervision by ,
some complexity, an end ltselhather . '. ;W~at are P~l\lt!11 suppos~d to do? large organizations. They, not managers, the boss, write the authors. . 1
than 8 legitimate means to the true end ' · Tum the asylum over to the Inmates? are the ones who create value. "People will do things because they
of business: prbvldlni value In the mar-Not exactly. But management as It It ls already happening. Just look at believe In what the corporation Is doing, ketplace. · . 1 exists today should not and cannot be software giant Microsoft Corp., already and because there are no other! roles
The major objective or any business salvaged by any Ravor-of-the-month a broadly entrepreneurial company. avalJ.able. People will not be super-
say the authors, Is detecting or ereatlng managerqent fad. In fact, management There Is an acid test In determining vlsea, though the results or their actions
customer demands and then wor•ln1 to as we know It today ls doomed as we Just how entrepreneurial your company will be transparent to all colleagues." : rpeet them. . head Into the next century, argue the and Its employees are: Do managers at Six major forces are driving the death·
Unfortunatel1, the dominant manage-· · authors, both or whom are management your company spend more time con-of management and shaping thtt new , ment fads ortbe 19901-re-en1lneerln1 consultants -Godden for Booz Allen le tributing to the Internal processes or post-management corporation, the . ·:
and empowerment -have not helr.ed Hamilton and Koch for bis own British managing and administering, or do they authors say. i . . . ~
much especially In bl1 ors"nlzat ons. . Orm, Odyssey. . spend more time adding, In some clear They are cu~tomer power; the spread: Whhe re-engineering has helped dl1-Koch and Godden are quick to . and direct way, to the welfare or cus-of Information tech~ology; sharphold-'. mantle aome of the "l\metlonal ner-acknowledge the paradox here: . · t~mers, Investors and society? . ·. ers' assertion of their legltlmac~ and , doms" that permeate so many arge · . Management consultants who ate saying · In 98 percent of today's companies, . rights; the emclenclee forced by lnter-
companlea, It .. 88 railed to fundamental-· th~t management Is no longer necessal')'. " managers do too much of the former and national competition; the drive for cbr-
ly change moat corporations. We may be perceived as biting the not enough of the latter. Ultimately, porate slmpllclty -reversing the trend ·
And empowerment, which 11 a kind of band that feeds ua by questioning the mapagers and employees must add of the last 50 years toward complex ·
throwbaclt to the reel-good, Dower-essence of management power and more to a company than ther subtracl lndustl'lal structures· and leader rower. power mentality or the 1960s, I• simply puthorlty,".they write ... Howeve~i we are No organization can sustain a manage-as a new breed orsu~cessful chle exec~
not workable In most large co111panle1, speaking out from a genuine des re to ment that Is preoccupied with organlz-utlves bury themselves In corporations.
where success depends on leadenhlp, paint a picture or the next generation of Ing rather than doing. Instead or relying on a bureaucratic control and singular direction. successful large corporations." . Companies such as Microsoft are ush-hierarchy or middle managers so what's the answer? Leaner man-· Management within a large corpora-erlng In an era of 11super corporations'' It all sounds a bit Utopian. But In agement? Actually, say the authors, the lion actually subtracts far more value led by entrepreneurs, not managers. reality It Is far rrom It.
solution ls more radical than that. than It adds, they say. Senior manage-These corporations will have standard-Makes you wonder If It's wGrih ft
The answer Is no management at all. ment alone spends about '10 percent or lzed operations throughout the world spending all that time and money earn-but lack a central headquarters. They Ing an MBA.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Section Page Date Subject Newpo~+ ~°"'I IJattr"sk.et( S"~ L.A. limes 04 e. g / tct I '11
-.
OK Likely for $500,000 Study of Newport Bay Watershed
The county is poised to join the
state Water Resources Board and
the Coastal ·Commission for a
two-year, $500,000 study of the
Newport Bay watershed.
County supervisors are ex-
pected to approve the second of
two grants today, with most of
the money coming from the state
water board. About a third.of the
funds will come from the Orange
County Transportation Corridor
Agencies because the proposed
Ea8tern tollway will be built near
San Diego Creek in Tustin,· close
to the El Toro Marine Cm:ps Air
Station.
The grants are provided
through the federal Clean Water
Act.
Upper Newport Bay and its
watershed are listed as impaired
because of nutrients, sediment,
toxins and bacteria, said Chris ·
Crompton, manager of environ-
mental resources for the county.
The state study will better map
the 150-square-mile watershed
and track the effects of develop-
ment and runoff.
"This is an attempt to find
some solutions for the long-term·
problems of the watershed,"
Crompton said.
The first grant, approved
.1 '
earlier this month, was for about
$50,000, with most of the money
coming from . the Coastal Com-
mission. The grant expected to be
approved today is for $137,000,
which will be used for evaluating
the impact of toxic materials on
the watershed and for a series of
public hearings.:
A third grant for $319,000 will
be used to buy one or two
additional booms used to capture
trash and debris along San Diego
Creek before it feeds into Upper
Newport Bay, Crompton said.
A separate project to dredge
built-up sediment and silt from
the bay received partial funding
earlier this month. The state .
budget signed by Gov. Pete Wit-
son includes $2 million for the
$4.9-million dredgipg project.
-JEAN 0. PASCO
f +
. (
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
Name of Paper Section Page Date Se.~'40-I Subject LA Ti·-~s o.c. ~4 B/t'll'n H o.t'tl Ssn\e.t\+ Tm·.'\·, "'I.+,,. rr\4~1~n: -..,
., ..
\ · ..
B4 R TUF3DAY,AUGUST 19, 1~
ORANGE COUNTY
. ~Qrintf Platis trailliligill Har~mentissues
: • Workplace: All 2,oOO bolster staff 4evelopment . pro-~ r.: The Lal>ucer we. ls the moSt A tOp. Soci8I . Services Agency
. • grams that were cut in the wake of · prominent of four smrual harass-administrator was placed on ad-. managers will" be taught · · Orange County's 1994 bankruptcy. ·, ~· ment complaints either pending or ministrative leave $-lier this year how to address the matter •. ~.. "~e conthiued to proVide [such] -.'>.recently. lodged ,ag~inst county after being accused of sexual bar-
. • · · ·· ·· : training. through the bankruptcy,-._ .. :.• managers. . . _ . . . . . . assmenl Move said not to be tn 1
:· but it Wa8 not as extensive as we : .' LaDucer stand& accused in a civil Despite the cases, county offi-. · · ·. response to currOOt caseS· :.:. '.; ._: wou1~ have _likett," .. satd Batt· Bart-\; . suit of. making inappropriate com-·· c1a1s 1ns1st. that sexual harassment
. · · . . • . . · lett, manager of the ~ounty's Equal . .ments . to Lt. Wendy Costello as . and sex discrimination do not ap-
-----------. ·.' .. Employment Opportunities Access·.,·., well as groping her and other .. pe~r. to be ·major problems lil
·. · By SHELBY GRAD ·. · . . · · . ·.office. "Now; we are able to beef up .: "~female Sheriffs Department .. em':' ' county government. "I feel one or
· TIMES ~APP WRITBR ·1· • ·; • : :. • •
1
! ,-; ·'. • ' · · the program· • · • . and mak~-sure :' ployees. After an internal investi;.: · . two· public cases can. 'distort. the
. .SANTAANA~Overtheiiextslx .. people are aware of the law and its · gation into the allegations,_ Sherif' ~.picture," Bartlett said. "We run. a
months, the ~~ty will provide~ provisions." . , . . . · .. : B~d Gates : last· wee~ ... fired his . · good shop.'~ . . . .. . . _:·: · .'. _ ·:
· training to all 2,000 of its managers, The training ~ touch on ;what ~. longtime aide. LaDucer s attomey, : . . He said employees have submit-.
supervisors and executives on how ··'·is,· censidered~ . appropriate. con-.!. however, denies that the" lawman_···~ ted only two sexual. harassment
. to deal with seXtial harassment In .... ~=duct .• and 1 bow ... m~nagers .. should . ':· .-~d anything wrong. ,: . . · :. . -_ _. . . .' cases to his office over the lastfew ·
. the workplace. i . . :-... · . ' . ·deal with complaints of sexual:\ __ : . · Helllth .. Care .. Agency. Dtreetqr: years. . . . . . The training~ w~ch ~ ~ ~er!<:···,.1 ·==~~v!~~~~~d;~~~:i'::J .i:·· ~= :i~:::b; f=~ . .f" s!~°:n~..!~=: :=~=n~~f~'
formed by a law fl~ that special".':'• ~' the training at one. time or another J ··county , Finance , Director Eileen. ' clals found some merit . to the '
izes in work~lace (ssues, comes ~~-'..·and that the new classes will be a J. Walsh,: 'who contencts Uram made ; · charBe and issued a· written warn-'
the county grapples with four ·· '~refresher.'' . . · • .. ~ · .. : (.~off-color remarks ·about women !. · 1ng to the person accused
'high-profile.-s,e~al. haras~ment . . . In June,· tlie ~cowity .. iit&il~ cOp· i: I and treated female' employ~ Im-. ·' In the other pase, an employee .
. . cases, Including.one· that~r~~~-· les:of its sexual harasSment gUlde-.·_; properly •.. Uram ~as .denied any ·claimed she was sexually harassed ·
·in the .flrinl. last week of Asilistant: : lines to all 14:000 employees in. '.-. wrorigdoirig, and the case is set to and then given a poor perfonmµ1ce
.. Sheriff Den~ LaDu~er. . : . . their pay envelopes. rrhe guidelines,:; . ~Bin later this year~ . : .. . . evaluation ~ter Cf?mplainlng. In-
County officials sald the training . said employees should refrain from . • And three Health Care· Agency vestigators didn't find evidence of
Is not being arrang~ in ~nse to "making-unwanted . sexuab ad-1;. ··workers filed suit ·last week,· · .harassment but did find inerit to
the recent rash of sexual harass-.· vances".or creating an "intimldat-. · charging that.their managers de-'the retaliation· charge. So they ~ent and sex discrimination ~ases · Ing, hostile and. offenBlve'~ ... work. -
1
;; ·· nied the~ promotions because of ··asked that the evaluation be re-
: : but rather marks . an . effort , to · environmenl . · . . · .. ' . · : :;-1 " • . their gender. .. .· written. . c. ·
·' . .';:". . • " . .. . I ; ;·,1. . ... ·--· :. __ ..:__· --------· -··· ...
I\ -J
/~J tl·\ 6-1)1&31\..L--
• •' •: : "' a
LOS ANGELES TIMES
County Gets Ul~tfuri-·
J.
to Pay 0µ.fMorieY from: ....... .
Agreemetit With MeITm .:·
. ·•. ..:~-. . ... :. ~--.... . ..... ~ . . . . : . t~-· : . . ;. ··,:· ... ~ .• :~:.·. ' ". • •.• : . ~.
_ • Governmint: Agericies that lOst funds m inyesiinent ··:·
:pool consider taking inatter top; S. Bankruptcy C9urt if . '.~-
the $30 million ls not is.med by Ti;iursday. .: --~ .... ··. . : : .. ·' . . .. .
By SHELBY GRAD · ·'· .: ,. 1. . • ~ ~oouri." -~._-::;~· .. :> :f:.-::-·:: · :, __
I
TIMBS STAPP WJUTBR .-.\ • ""< ··' . :: · '.. · · . · More .. than 200 government.. . ~ ._
• , . • ·: .. ::.;• --•. L ... ·; · .. : • -.,. • ;··agencies bad deposited money in. .
. ' SANTA ANA:~;L«al _clti~ and ,·the . county-run investment pc)of ,·::-. .. . ._
school districts ~d they will ~n-· .. that lOst $1.64 billion of Its value in ;. :._ _. ·
· ~der ~legal a~tiQn.uilJ.es8 the 1994, prompting county officials to ;~_ :· .. : ~
councy agrees by :Thursday _that · . declare bankruptcy. While most of · ... · ·
· they should be given the $30 mil-:_.:_.those agencies have received 80% :,· ·:. :·
lion that Merrill Lyn~ &: .Co. paid : · .w 90% of their investment back, ·. ,. . · ·
· to avoid prosecutio~ . ~n J>ank-'. .. · . . . . · . · .
ruptcy-rela~~es:.·~~·~::r;:·: .. < .. · · ~--.. , , .. · .. ... ~ . . . . ...
· The cities ~~. ~ool'.dist.ricts . _: · · . ~ ?: 'We wouid llke a ·
that lost money.ui the_ bankruptcy. · .. ·• ·~ · . . ·.:
contend that the binkniptcy re-·· · ~-· ·resolutl0'9 by Thursday. · t . ; · . ·
·covery . plan reci~es:. that _the , · ; Thi balfls In thecolinty!s :. -.:._ ·
$30 ~nbepaidouttothem.. --.·. :: .~. , , ~" . . , ·
.. But some county officials said · :·~ : · · .. : . ·'· COUf'.t... . . ~ . ·
the government agencies are not .:· ·, ·' <:-: ·J· . . -· · t :'.'~ · .... .. · •
entitled to 'ihe money, ·and they . · ~· : :,:;~--.: ~AULBIW>Y -.~
· have suggested usirig· it for a ". : ·. · ·~. ~-· ~ne .. clty manager
variety of p~ county projects. · ·. · ·. .. · · ~. . · .... ~-: .·
· Attorney& for the various parties · · ·· · ... :' •:~ ;_.-,.~ ~::: ::.-.~:;·£X-.t .. ~fl.. ·
.. have been meeting in ari attempt to . they wm see 'the ~der only if
= S()rt out the· legal issues since , . the coun(y Is eucees&fuUn its civil
.: . lh~rtly after Merrill Lynch agreed -_ .r ·uttgation · againSt. · :yernn· Lynch
. : .... 1
, ·to· the settlement · t.i ·June.· But . ~d otheridt. holds iesP01'81ble for
.· · patience appears ~ be'.·:.w~ ··· : oauslng thefinanchil collapse. · ·. · .
: "thin. . .. .. =/.~~~ ·:.::'t·:~~:._i;~:?~~"; --~~.;.:::~:~·under. the recovery J-P.lan, the
Irvine City Manlier Paul' Brady· · .. first~ from th~ civillitiga-
said a commit~ .of cl~; 'speclal. ·i tion· woUld gO tc>' sChoOl. districts,.
· districts and sc'h~ plan to meet· · :. ~hlch are still due ~ut $110 mil-
Thursday to discuss the matter:-~· •J :·.-lion they invested in th~· pool But
, If the county-~·~ agreed by ... · the ~very plan does not mention
. then to turn overjhe $30 uiillion, ·:~how settlements of~ cases
Brady said. the _comiDlttee··~uld .. ·· . .-shouldbehanc11~ ~;9~·t,t:, :: .
decide to briilg the dispute to the · -:-.:;· Some county supervisors .. favor
lJ. S. Bankruptcy Courtj\ldge who·_.::,.livinl most of:the $30 .~on to
approved the rec6very plan..,,·:.:.."".'·.::::: .. : ·.schools as·agestute of good faith.
•.•we have suggested' :_very···:.:;_ ·But' other ~Iii have ex-
. strongly that this money belongs to ~ pressed interest · 1n · using the
the [outside] investors (Iii the · $30 million for a 'variety· of press-
county's investment pool] and not ing"county projects, sucll ·as ex-
the county," Brady .. said._ ~~W'e ••. ,,. ~ding ~ spa~; __ constructing a
would like a resolution by: Thurs-·~.. new South Countj Courthouse and
day. The ~ Is in the comity's · . .;retiring bankruPiCr debts early.
. . ' .. : '• -~
L . . I I vt,U_-f1-tqutd Assets "w&J".
A Bass Play in Water
May Presage Big Shift
In I ts Distribution
Los Angeles Agency Sweats
Over Supplies, Gouging,
But Some See a Harvest
Why MarketsSeemlnevitable
By CHARLES McCOY
And G. PASCAL ZACHARY
Staff Reporters o/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
LOS ANGELES -If you think water is a
bland subject, listen to what the billionaire
Bass brothers, big time Texas investors,
are saying these days about the Metropoli-
tan Water District, one or the world's
biggest utilities: "A monopolist. A water
thief."
Replies John R. Wodraska, general
manager or the agency that serves 16
million urban-
dwelling Southern
Californians: The
Basses are profi-
teers trying to cre-
ate a "water cartel"
in hopes or making
a huge fortune on a
resource delivered
to them essentially
for free. Adds Mr.
Wodraska: "This is
going to get
nasty."
In fact, it al-Edward Bass
ready has.
A few years ago, the Basses, with a S7
billion empire in oil and real estate, raised
a re.w eyebrows when they began quietly
buymg up SBO million in irrigated [arm
land in the sprawling Imperial Valley
south and east of here. They were going to
raise cattle. But it became clear, soon
enough, that the Basses' real interest was
in the perpetual federal water rights con-
ferred with the 40,000 acres they acquired.
Seen as a longterm arbitrage play, the
strategy goes something like this: Eventu-
ally, water supplies for this area of vast
urban sprawl and water-hogging agricul-
ture will grow tight; those with the water,
and the right to sell any surplus, stand to
make megabucks.
Whether the Basses' gambit works ex-
actly as planned, their timing coincides
with an unprecedented effort by state and
federal governments to deregulate utilities
of all kinds. Many believe water, long
subsidized by taxpayers and ladled out by
public agencies under programs tilted to-
ward agriculture and against conserva-
tion, will be no exception.
The Basses' significant presence sim-
ply adds weight to what some think is the
inevitable: that water must become a
commodity, to be sold at whatever price
the market will bear.
"Without water markets, we can't solve
the problem of meeting the future water
needs or the West," Interior Secretary
Bruce Babbitt says.
If the slugf est between the Basses and
~he. M~tropolitan Water District is any
md1cauon. however. getting there may
prove to be a rancorous struggle reminis-
cent of an old-fashioned water war wherein
powerful elites wrested water from others
creating vast fortunes and plotlines for the
1974 film "Chinatown."
The Basses last year fired an opening
salvo at the district, known as the Met,
wh.en ~hey h.elped convince the Imperial
Imgat1on District. an agriculture-domi-
nated water agency, to strike a deal that
would pool IID surplus water from its
farmer clients, including the Basses. and
sell it to the city of San Diego for prices as
much as 40% less than it currently pays the
Met. Surpluses could be created by conser-
vation, switching to more water-efficient
c.rops or even ~eeping land out or produc-
t1~n: nothmg m the act conferring the
original water rights prohibits their sale.
The _75-year contract would fetch prices
starting at about 15 times as high as what
valley landowners currently pay the dis·
trict for the water, which it takes for free
from the Colorado River.
: San Diego. not coincidei:itally, happens
tp be the Met's biggest, and unhappiest,
customer. The Met
quickly denounced
the deal and, more
forcefully, bran-
dished a weapon
that could stop it.
Since the IID's wa-
ter would have to
move through the
Met's aqueduct. the
. Met has already
proposed a trans-<
port surcharge that
would make the
Lee Bass deal uneconomical.
And it escalated its
resistance just two weeks ago when it took
the extraordinary steps of appealing to a
federal agency that controls irrigation
outflows from the Colorado River; what the
Met ultimately is asking for is a share of
the IlD's Colorado River allocation -a
move that, if successful, would take water
right out of the hide of IID farmers,
including the Basses.
The Met doesn't pussyfoot around what
is at stake here. Losing San Diego, its
biggest customer, would raise costs for its
other customers and could eventually lead
to the Met's disintegration. "It could be the
end of the Met as we know it," says Tim
Quinn. the Met's chief dealmaker.
Matters have grown so testy that Mr.
Wodraska says, 'Tm afraid I'm going to
get my nose sliced off," referring to the
Please Turn lo Page A6, Column I
,,
'fk (YA 17-l.CD Hi.0 ~I
J)oµJ
A voc:::-r
J~n,JL)
AZ.n~
~A~J/t~~
H C-<t;_
/t-tf~tA-L-.
vAL-L-~
~
~h~C.~
A6 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL FRIDAY • .nJLY 11, 1997
Bass Brothers Roil the Western Waters
Continued From First Page
rate or the hardboiled hero in "Chinatown"
who takes on wealthy water grabbers.
Counters Ardon Moore. the Basses'
point man in the Imperial Valley: "If they
think their normal routine or spreading
misinrormalion and insults ... Is going to
make us hide under our tractor, they have
railed IO do their homework."
Deep Issues
The spat here has enormous policy
implications for water use In the West
which. like other regions or the country, is
governed by a hodgepodge of federal and
state regulations. Agriculture consumes
about 91m or the region's water. even as its
contribution to the urbanizing region's
economy is diminishing. Ir water can be
sold freely. the argument goes. farmers
will have powerful Incentives to conserve
and growing cities will have a mechanism
for obtaining water. The great practical
question. backers acknowledge. Is to what
degree the public will tolerate the poten·
tially huge profits that markets could mean
for some landowners. even when they have
their water because of taxpayer·funded
dams or other public investments. Some
suggest that several of the Imperial Val·
ley's biggest landowners could reap much
of the profits Crom an estimated S2 billion
to SJ billion in revenues over 50 years.
"My feeling is that ultimately if you're
perceived as profiteering in the sale or
water. you're going to unleash a lot or ugly
forces," says Don Cox. an Imperial Valley
grower and a director or its irrigation
agency.
Mr. Cox's view. in fact. highlights a fissure among Imperial Valley landowners
themselves. som11 or whom are leery or the
Basses and their plans even though many
rarmers there stand to make money should the contract with San Diego, or other
entities. eventually go forward. ·.
It probably hasn't helped that the
Basses. though they initially eased into
this desert valley, wasted no time In
rtexing their muscle. Consider that a 1996
Imperial County review board, a county·
appointed investigative citizens panel.
found that the Basses appeared to have
had "undue innuence" on irrigation dis·
trict decisions; among other things, Mike
Clinton. a Conner consultant whose Cinn ·
once worked for the Basses, was hired as
manager of the IID not long after the
Basses arrived on the scene.
The Bass brothers are Sid. Robert,
Edward and Lee. Edward and Lee are said
lo be the main drivers behind the Imperial
Valley waler play. The investments. how·.
ever, may be divisive within the Bass camp
Itself. A lobbyist for Robert Bass recently
conracted an opponent of the Bass plan to
assure him that Robert wasn't involved. (A
spokesman Cor Robert Bass declined to
comment.)
Nonetheless, Bass officials are galled
by the criticism otrheir strategy. A spokes·
man notes that selling water is a concept
that had been kicked around in the valley
long before the Basses arrived. "This Is a
real opportunity for the Imperial Valley to
do something that is good for the state,
Jrood for the economy. ~ tor the environ·
ment and will help move airrlcullure into
lhl' 21st century," says Mr. Moore, presi· ·
dent or Western Farms & Cattle Co.. a
Uass·owned California farming enterprise
lhmui:h which the Basses have made their
Imperial Valley purchases. As ror the
Imperial County review panel's report, the
Basses say they did nothing Improper.
Whatever the case, the Basses have
certainly waded into the middle or one or
California's longest-running feuds. The
Met and Imperial Valley growers are his·
toric enemies. Since its creation in 1928,
the Met has eyed with envy the vast water
resources of the Imperial Valley, a desert
that gets only two-inches or rain annually.
Though it has a population or only 160,000.
the valley, through the IJD, has old water
rights allowing it to draw about three
million acre feet or water annually from
the Colorado River. (An acre Coot ls 326,000
gallons. or a two-year supply for a family
or four.)
Landowners' water rights are held in
trust by the llD. governed by a Cive-mem·
ber elected board and based In.the valley.
As a result or agricutture·f rlendly policies
dating back decades, the district gets the
waler tor Cree (though It pays Cor dlstrlbu·
lion costs> and sells it for 512.50 an acre
fool lo desert Canners who grow alfalfa,
melons. lettuce and other crops. Under the
district's plan. tanners would generate
water savings by switching to less water·
intensive crops or conserve water through
new techniques. thus saving water that
can be shifted 10 cities.
The Met. by contrast, buys water Crom
a variety or sources for prices ranging up
to S200 an acre Coot: it sells water for about
SJ50 an acre Coot to its mostly urban users.
represented by 27 water agencies spread
over six counties. It is allowed to draw only
about 550,000 acre feet or water annually
from the Colorado River. and gets another
1.5 million acre feet or so Crom other sources.
But the Met is widely res~nled In
Western water circles. For one thing, it has
typically exceeded its Colorado River enti· llement by sopping up water not used by
neighboring states. a practice resented by
the states and one which the federal gov·
emment is ordering it to stop. ·
Moreover. for decades the Met has
wielded political muscle in heavy-handed
ways. One of its members, Los Angeles,
engineered the most notorious water
power play ever. practically draining the
Owens River valley In the 1920s and leav·
Ing farmers there high and dry.
This isn't lost on Canners in the lmpe·
rial Valley. "The Met is an 800-pound
gorilla,'.' says John Pierre Menvielle, an
Imperial Valley grower. "Well, the Basses
arc our 800-pound gorilla."
Starting the Play
Which is what scares others. Louise
Willey, a 77·year-old rancher, met with two
Bass officials. including Mr. Moore, in the
spring or 1995. "They assured me they
were just a couple or good ol' boys" who
wanted to graze cattle. she says. "I said.
'Whatever you do. don't mess around wilh
our water. They said. 'Oh no ma'am, we wouldn't do anything like that.· "
Mr. Moore says the Basses never mis·
led anyone •. but In any case, they had made
their plan plain to others. Mr. Wodraska or
the Met, for instance, met with Mr. Moore
for· dinner at the Los Angeles Century
Pla1.a hotel in September 1994. Mr. Moore
eventually talked about the .JID selling
water to the Met.. He didn't lulk price, but
two weeks later, he met with Mr. Quinn,
the Mel's chief dealmaker. Whal happened
al lhat meetin~ is a maller or boiling
dispute.
Mr. Quinn says Mr. Moore proposed
selling water at S600 an acre root -more
than three times what the Met has ever
paid, even in a drought. Mr. Quinn says he
bluntly told Mr. Moore: "I don't see a
market where you do.·· Mr. Moore heat·
edly denies proposing any prices.
In any case, both sides agree that the
meeting left hard re~llngs; a Bass lobbyist
even called Mr. Wodraska the next day 10
complain that Mr. Quinn had treated Mr.
Moore brusquely. When Mr. Wodraska
called Mr. Moore to talk things over, their
conversation turned testy, too. both say.·
Meanwhile, in the valley, the Basses'
trademark low·prome was giving rise to
some strange rumors. At one point, the
Basses were said to be growing crops Cor
Russians. In fact. they were running cattle
and leasing land to other rarmers. But in
June 1995, at a public meeting before an
overflow crowd in the IID auditorium, Mr.
Moore urged growers to take advantage or
a historic "window of opportunity."
"We are firmly convinced that water Is
going to move In the·Western U.S." he
said. "The real Issue we are .trying to
figure Is how do all or us-and we are going
to be involved in this-do It wisely."
l\llxed Opinions.
Some people enthusiastically backed
the plan Crom the start, but It scared
others. "The great paranoia that hit this
valley was that the Basses would idle their
land and take their water sale money to
Fort Worth," recalls Mr. Clinton. general
manager of the IID. Indeed, the prospect of
rallowlng, the "F·word," as It is known
here. still rattles some. They rear th~t as
water is drawn off for sales. there will be less for Canning. land will lie fallow and the
local economy will crater.
"Only a few people will make money.
and the rest or us will have to go some·
where else." says Ed Brown, a farm·equip·
ment salesman in the valley.
The Imperial County review panel re·
port. released in 1996 and noting Mr.
Clinton's past ties to the Basses. didn't
help matters. Mr. Clinton says he told the
IID of his past work for the Basses before
they hired him: ·the agency says it did
nothing wrong: and a Bass spokesman
says the review panel itself was stacked
with antl·Bass members.
Whatever its merit, the report fanned
anti·Bass sentiment among some In the
valley. Bill Condit, a 20·year veteran or the
110 board and a supporter of water sales.
declined an orrer to meet the Bass brothers
in Fort Worth. "They wanted to prove to
me that they weren't some kind or mon·
sters," he says. But he declined for fear or
alienating his constituents.
The Basses are wounded by that kind of
commentary, and note that they have
plenty or supporters In the valley. "Some
people think we have horns. and some
don·t," Mr. Moore says. He points out that
the Basses have significant interests in
California real estate, a major stake in
Wall Disney Co. and many other invest·
ments -and argues that without water
transfers, the entire state economy could
be jeopardized as urban areas Inevitably
. nm short or water. · I '-.
l1Cis 3damaili.liial !ti~ 8~5;;;;-;;;~~-
. the long· haul in Imperial Valley. won't
ranow land· and want the whole community
10 beneCit. Bass supporters also note the
Basses have given heavily lo the United
Way and other local charities. and have
proposed earmarking a percentage of any
water·sale profits for county services.
The Bass interests· say the llD's pro·
posed deal with San Diego, which they
helped broker and strongly back, is further
proof or their good faith. The original San
Diego proposal. announced last fall. calls
ror the sale or as much as soo.ooo acre feet
or water a year annually for up 10 75 years
for prices that start at 5200 an acre Coot and
climb over time.
The proposal has other innuential
backers. in part because it is a shot at the
Mel's long dominance of urban water. Tom
Grarr, an Environmental Defense Fund
attorney and a frequent critic or agricul·
lure's water practices. nonetheless wel·
comes the Basses' role. "They've got the
toughness and · ag-gressiveness" to over·
come the Met. "which is not a trivial
opponent," he says.
Still, the Basses· promise to hang In Cor
the duration Is likely to be put to the test.
San Diego and llD have reopened negotia·
lions on the teff11s or their proposed deal
because or concerns by some valley Cann·
ers: the talks are so tough that Abraham
Sofaer, a former Mideast envoy, has been
called In to mediate. Any deal Is almost
certain to produce lawsuits. Some experts
doubt the matter will be resolved Cor
years.
And the talk only gets tougher.
Mr. Quinn, the Met's dealmaker, goes
over the math that he says sht>WS that the
Basses. and other valley landowners.
would reap enormous profits. even IC they
plowed back huge amounts of their water
sales into Improvements and conserva·
lions measures. "The math is staggering."
he says. "The rich get richer."
The Basses insist profits wouldn't be
anywhere near windfall levels and"say that
markets themselves will create competi-
tion and equitable pricing. or the Met. Mr.
Moore observes: "Communism has been
tried and it failed."
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority
August 19, 1997
' Donald F. Mcintyre
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Don,
COMMISSION FOR THE PROJECT AUTHORITY
CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
ORANGE COUNlY WATER DISTRICT
SAN BERNARDINO VALJE( MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGER
NEILM.CUNE
Enclosed is SAWPA's Check No. 1067 in the amount of $4,052,476.53.
Subject to the CSDOC/SAWPAAgreement, SAWPAis required to purchase additional
treatment capacity from tl)e County Sanitation Districts of Orange County.
In April 1997, SAWPA submitted $1,039,969.00 to acquire 2 additional MGD increments
over a 10-year period based upon SA WP A's understanding of the contract. CSDOC has not
agreed with SAWP A's method of computing interest for the time purchase acquisition and
has requested that full payment be made for the 9th MGD unit and additional funds be
submitted to cover the initial charge for the acquisition of the lO'h MGD.
The SAWPA Commission has reviewed this matter, as noted in our July 16, 1997
correspondence, and has agreed to purchase the 9th MGD capacity unit outright and seeks
. to resolve the method of payment for the lO'h MGD in accordance with the "Meet and
Confer" requirements of the Agreement.
Therefore, the purchase price for the gth MGD is $4,543, 176.53.
9'hMGD
lOthMGD
AmountDue ·· ·
Less Payment on 4/18/97
Balance Due
Very truly yours,
. N liJ. . Ut,;,i
Neil M. Cline
Genera1: Manager
$4,543, 176.53
549.269.00
$5,092,445.53
$1.039.969.00
$4,052,476.53
11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503 • (909) 785-5411
Administration FAX (909) 785-7076 •Planning FAX (909) 352-3422
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
JOINT BOARD MEETING
JULY 30, 1997
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
07/30/97
Page 2of10
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on July 30, 1997, at 7:30 p.m.1 in
the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll
was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 51 61 71 11, 13
and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT x Pat McGuigan, Chair Thomas E. Lutz
N0.1 x James M. Ferryman, Chair pro tern Arthur Perry x Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz x Thomas R. Saltarelli Jim Potts x Todd Spitzer William G. Steiner
DISTRICT x Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair Michael L. Maertzweiler
NO. 2 x Mark A. Murphy, Chair pro tern Joanne Coontz x Steve Anderson John Holmberg x John Collins James Petrikin x Barry Denes Bob Bell x Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff x Mark Leyes Bruce A. Broadwater x Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz x Chris Norby Don Bankhead x Todd Spitzer William G. Steiner x HankWedaa Mark Schwing x Bob Zemel Tom Dalv
DISTRICT x Mamie L. Rice, Chair James V. Evans
N0.3 x Eva Miner-Bradford, Chair pro tern Paul F. Walker
x Steve Anderson John Holmbera x Geome Brown Gwen Forsythe
x Tom Carroll Mary Ann Jones
Brian Donahue x Harrv M. Dotson
x Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff
x Mark Leyes Bruce A. Broadwater
A Patsy Marshall Jack Mauller
x Pat McGuiaan Thomas E. Lutz x Chris Norby Don Bankhead x Todd Spitzer William G. Steiner x Dave Sullivan Tom Harman
x Charles E. Sylvia Alice B. Jempsa
x Bob Zemel Tom Daly
DISTRICT x Jan Debav, Chair John E. Neves
N0.5 x John E. Noyes, Chair pro tern Jan Debav
William G. Steiner x Todd Spitzer
DISTRICT x James M. Fenvman, Chair Arthur Perry
NO. 6 William G. Steiner, Chair pro tern x Todd Spitzer
x Jan Debav Tom W. Thomson
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
07/30/97
Page 3of10
ACTIVE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT x Thomas R. Saltarelli. Chair
NO. 7 Christina Shea. Chair pro tern x Jan Debay x James M. Ferryman x Pat McGuiaan x Mark A. Murphy
William G. Steiner
DISTRICT Shirley Dettloff, Chair
N0.11 x Dave Sullivan, Chair pro tern x Todd Spitzer
DISTRICT x Burnie Dunlao, Chair
N0.13 x Mark Schwina, Chair pro tern x Mark A. Murphy
William G. Steiner x Bob Zemel
DISTRICT Christina Shea, Chair
N0.14 x Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair pro tern x Mark A. Murohv
William G. Steiner x Peer A. Swan
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
Jim Potts x Barrv Hammond
Tom W. Thomson
Arthur Perrv
Thomas E. Lutz
Joanne Coontz x Todd Soitzer
x Tom Hannan
Tom Hannan
William G. Steiner
Martv Simonoff
HankWedaa
Joanne Coontz x Todd Soitzer
Tom Dalv
x Banv Hammond
Jim Potts
Joanne Coontz x Todd Spitzer
Danvl Miller
Don F. Mcintyre, General Manager; Blake P. Anderson, Assistant General Manager of
Operations; Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager of Administration; Penny Kyle, Board
Secretary; Nick Arhontes; Jeff Armstrong; Barbara Collins; Mark Esquer; Ingrid Hellebrand;
Brian Keating; Steve Kozak; John Linder; David A. Ludwin; Mike Moore; Mike Peterman;
Suzanne Smith; Gary Streed; Moira Sullivan; Mitch Trivanovich; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy
Wheatley; Chuck Winsor; Paula Zeller
OTHERS PRESENT:
Thomas L Woodruff, General Counsel; Art Perry, Alternate Director; Denis Bilodeaux; Don
Jamison
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR
The Joint Chair reported that Governor Wilson had signed the Districts' consolidation
bill, AB769. Staff was preparing the application to LAFCO and the Executive
Committee would be meeting on September 17th to discuss the filing and the next steps
to be taken.
•
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
07/30/97
Page 4of10
Chair Collins also referred to a fax sent to all Directors announcing that Judy Wilson has
accepted a position with the Los Angeles Department of Public Works as Director of
Sanitation, subject to confirmation by the city council.
It was then announced that only the Planning, Design and Construction Committee
would be meeting on August 7. All other committees would be dark. In addition there
would be a Directors' workshop on Saturday, August 2, focusing on the Districts' ocean
discharge permit.
The Joint Chair directed attention to the booth set up in the back of the room, which was
the set up for a 17-day run at the Orange County Fair. Michelle Tuchman, Director of
Communications, spoke briefly about the fair and introduced key staff that was in
charge of the project.
ADOPT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING EMPLOYEE CAii Districts): The
Joint Chair requested that Resolution No. 97-30 be adopted expressing appreciation to Judith A.
Wilson for her contribution and dedication to public service upon her retirement from the
Distrids. The resolution was then presented to Ms. Wilson.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES CAii Distrids)
There being no corredions or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 25,
1997, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director Todd Spitzer abstained.
RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS CAii Distridsl
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims
set forth on exhibits "A", "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and
summarized below.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
07/30/97
Page 5of10
ALL DISTRICTS 5/14/97 05/28/97 MISC.
Joint Operating Fund $ 394,580.99 $ 386,016.11 $50,669.43
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 3,286,351.21 355,312.70 58,364.94
Joint Working Capital Fund 138,089.17 580,675.28 17,688.37
Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 93,582.37 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 1 225.00 10,076.48 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 2 2,772.50 35,027.51 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 3 11,137.42 547,342.87 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 5 27.15 13,382.87 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 6 0.00 3,455.71 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 7 800.95 10,531.54 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 11 5,219.62 6,477.24 1,670.20
DISTRICT NO. 13 0.00 421.94 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 0.00 438.43 0.00
DISTRICTS NO. 5 & 6 0.00 498.40 0.00
DISTRICTS NO. 6 & 7 0.00 216.49 0.00
DISTRICTS NO. 7 & 14 0.00 17.18 0.00
$3 839 204 01 $2,043 472.53 $128 392.94
Directors Mark Leyes and Todd Spitzer abstained.
DISTRICT NO. 2
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE PETITION RECEIVED FROM
PHILLIP AND BARBARA JOUJON-ROCHE TO ANNEX .608 ACRES OF TERRITORY TO THE
DISTRICTS IN THE VICINITY OF SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD AND MOHLER DRIVE IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AND AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF ANNEXATION OF SAID
TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT. <PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 78 JOUJON-ROCHE
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2).
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to adopt Resolution No. 97-29-2, initiating proceedings
for Annexation No. 78 -Joujon-Roche Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2.
DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES CAii Districts): Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of
Steering Committee presented A verbal report, re the July 30, 1997 meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 25,
1997 to be filed.
·j Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
07/30/97
Page 6of10
DRAFT OPERATIONS. MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
MINUTES CAii Districts}: A verbal report was presented by Diredor Pat McGuigan, Chair of the
Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting,
summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee
Minutes.for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed. ·
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS. INC. FOR
PRIVATE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DISTRICTS' OXYGEN GENERATION
SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2: The Operations-Maintenance Department requests consideration
from the Board of Diredors to amend several terms and conditions of the original agreement for
an estimated cost savings of $215,000 for each year of the remaining seven (7) years of the
fifteen-year contract.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Authorize the General Manager to execute an
amendment to the original agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the private
operation and maintenance of the Districts' oxygen generation system at Plant No. 2, approved
as to form by the Districts' Contracts/Purchasing Manager.
DRAFT PLANNING. DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES CAii
Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Burnie Dunlap, Chair of the Planning,
Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting, summarizing the
actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee
Minutes for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed.
DISTRICTS 3 & 11
CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1 WITH COUCH BROS .. INC. OBA
COUCH & SONS. FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS <Districts 3 and 11 >: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering
request approval of Change Order No. 6 providing thirteen items of additional work and granting
a time extension of 101 calendar days for completion of the additional work.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Change Order No. 6 to Contract No. 11-
17-1 with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons for an addition of $92,305.00 and 101 calendar
days, increasing the total contract amount to $6,005,724.03.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
07/30/97
Page 7of10
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO JOB NOS. P1-41. P1-43. P1-44. P2-48. P2-50. P2-53-2.
SP19950021 AND SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR REHABILITATION
OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3. 4. AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1: SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON-
STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 1: SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 1:
REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS D THROUGH Q AT PLANT NO. 2: SEISMIC
RETROFIT OF NON-STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2: SEISMIC RETROFIT AT
PLANT NO. 2: TUNNEL COVER REPLACEMENT AT BILLINGS TUNNEL AT PLANT NO. 2:
AND SLUDGE PIPING MODIFICATION AT PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS 6-15: The
Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 1
providing eleven items of added and deleted work and granting a time extension of 37 days for
completion of the added work.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P1-41, et
al. with Margate Construction, for a deduction of $85,680.00 decreasing the total contract
amount to $8,375,458.00, and an addition of 37 calendar days time extension.
ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP
DRESSER & MCKEE CCDMl FOR JOB NOS. J-40-1 AND J-40-2 RE PREPARATION OF
PHASE 1 OF STRATEGIC PLANS CALL DISTRICTS>: The Director of Engineering requests
approval of an Addendum to the PSA providing for additional work in three areas: (1) updating
trunk sewer system information contained in the Districts' CASSWORKS data base, {2)
development of pump station discharge curves, and (3) additional public, staff, and Board
meeting support.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: 1. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the PSA with COM in
the amount of $199,489 for a total amount not to exceed $1,958,717.
Director Mark Leyes abstained.
DRAFT FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION. AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES
CAii Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance,
Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the July 30, 1997 meeting, summarizing
the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting.
The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee
Minutes for the meeting held July 30, 1997 to be filed.
TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 30. 1997 CAii Districts)
A motion was made, seconded and carried to receive and fife this information-only item.
'
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
07/30/97
Page 8of10
ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND
DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF
FINANCE/TREASURER CAii Districts):
After discussion among the Directors, the motion was moved, seconded and carried to refer this
item back to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee for further study
and consideration, to be brought back before the Joint Boards in September; and to place a
moratorium on investing in reverse repurchase agreements until the Joint Boards vote to
approve the final policy on reverse repurchase agreements.
DECLARATION OF DISTRICTS' OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICTS'
EXISTING CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE IN
ADVANCE OF. AND IN ANTICIPATION OF. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES.
FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE INDEBTEDNESS ISSUE CAii Districts):
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Adopt Resolution No. 97-28, declaring Districts'
official intent to reimburse the Districts' existing capital reserve funds for certain expenditures
made in advance of, and in anticipation of, capital improvement expenditures from proceeds of
a future indebtedness issue.
1997-98 FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE UPDATE AND SOFTWARE
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE DISTRICTS' FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SOFTWARE VENDOR. JD EDWARDS. IN THE AMOUNT OF $55.384.87 CAii Districts):
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Approve the 1997-98 financial information software
update and software maintenance agreement with the Districts' financial information software
vendor, JD Edwards, in the amount of $55,384.87.
Director Mark A. Murphy abstained.
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR PURCHASE OF COMPUTER
EQUIPMENT CAii Districts): GSA staff requests approval of offering a computer
financial assistance program to employees.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: Approve a computer financial assistance program to
employees providing for a maximum loan of $3,000; 1 Oo/o down payment; 24 months repayment
period; interest rate at 5%; and aggregate maximum loan fund of $150,000.00.
Director Mark A. Murphy abstained.
AUTHORIZE STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH R.W. BECK TO DEVELOP
ASSUMPTIONS AND STRATEGIES TO IMPLEMENT A REPLACEMENT FUND FOR FIXED
ASSETS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75.000 CAii Districts):
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: That the Directors authorize staff to negotiate an
agreement with R.W. Beck to develop assumptions and strategies to implement a Replacement
Fund for fixed assets for an amount not to exceed $75,000.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
07/30/97
Page 9of10
ANNUAL ELECTION OF JOINT CHAIR
The Joint Chair announced that this was the annual meeting at which election of the Joint Chair
of the Joint Administrative Organization is to be held. The Secretary stated that Diredor John
Collins had been nominated at the regular meeting of the Joint Boards on June 25, 1997, in
accordance with established procedures.
There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled and the Secretary the unanimous
ballot for Director John Collins as Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization.
ANNUAL ELECTION OF VICE JOINT CHAIR
This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards of Directors for the election of the Vice Joint
Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Joint chair then called for nominations for the
post, whereupon Director Peer A. Swan was nominated.
There being no other nominations, the vote was then polled, and the Secretary cast the
unanimous ballot for Director Peer A. Swan as the Vice Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative
Organization.
DISTRICTS 7 & 14
ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE
ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION.
CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1. AND ABANDONMENT OF NINE DISTRICT NO. 7 PUMP STATIONS.
CONTRACT NO. 7-14 (Districts 7 & 14) :
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried: The Director of Engineering requests approval of
Addendum No. 4 to the PSA providing for additional work for construction contract support
services during the construction of Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract
No. 7-7-1.
Director Todd Spitzer abstained.
Minutes for Joint Board Meeting
07/30/97
Page 10of10
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS. P1-41. P1-43. P1-44. P2-48. P2-50. P2-53-2.
P19950021 and SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR PAYMENT OF
CONSTRUCTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH FACILITIES TO PERMIT DISCHARGE OF
EXCESS RECLAIMED WATER TO THE DISTRICTS' OCEAN OUTFALL SYSTEM TO BE
FUNDED BY DISTRICT 5 CAii Districts): The Engineering Department requests approval of
Change Order No. 2 for construction costs for an increased amount not to exceed $197,299.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to execute Change
Order No. 2 for Job Nos. P1-41, P1-53, P1-44, P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021 and
SP19950059 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the Green Acres
Project distribution system and the Districts' ocean outfall system for an amount not to exceed
$197,299, to be funded by District 5; and,
DISTRICT 5: Moved, seconded and carried to approve District 5 funding of Change Order
No. 2 for Job No. P2-48 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the
Green Acres Project distribution system and the Sanitation Districts' ocean outfall system at a
cost not to exceed $197,299.
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE <District Nos. 5 and 6): Receive and file
Summons and Complaint for negligence, David P. Gatliff v. Wal-Con Construction Company,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 779933, in connection with Replacement of Pacific
Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3.
MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1) Find that the matter arose subsequent to the
posting of the agenda pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2{b){2); 2)
Receive and file Summons and Complaint; and 3) Authorize Districts' General Counsel to
appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9
CAii Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at 9:12 p.m. pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of
Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2
and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board
and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item No. 18{a){5).
RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION CAii Districts): At 9:31 p.m., the Boards reconvened in
regular session.
ADJOURNMENTS CAii Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:32 p.m.
r s of Directors of
i ricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
\\lead\data2\wp.dta\admin\BS\MIN97\073097.doc
.... _,
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
158819 A & G INDUSTRIES $1,805.22 STRAINER PROBES
158820 AT & T -MEGACOM SERVICE $3,013.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
158821 AT & T -CELLULAR CR & R $1.47 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
158822 AWSI $30.00 D.O.T. TRAINING PROGRAM
158823 ABRASIVE ENG. TOOLING & EQUIP. $154.24 HARDWARE
158824 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES $420.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
158825 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. $417,891.60 CONSTRUCTION J-34-1, P2-35-5
158826 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $139.25 AIRFREIGHT
158827 ALADDIN HOUSE $604.56 WINDOW BLINDS
158828 ALCO PRODUCTS INC $267.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
158829 ALLOSEP $431.81 FILTERS
158830 ALPHA RESEARCH GROUP $14,430.00 ON-SITE TRAINING DEVELOPMENT
158831 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
158832 AMERICAN DIGITALTECHNOLOGIES $1,200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
158833 AMERICAN INST OF GRAPHIC ARTS $245.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
158834 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $257.33 PUBLICATION
158835 APCO VALVE & PRIMER CORP. $346.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
~ 158836 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4,841.70 NOTICES & ADS
158837 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
158838 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
I-'· 158839 AWARDS & TROPHIES $172.69 PLAQUES
rt 158840 BAR TECH TELECOM, INC. $200.00 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION :r 158841 BARNEBY-SUTCLIFFE CORP. $136.96 FILTERS
~ 158842 BARNES & NOBEL BOOKS $23.27 PUBLICATION
158843 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $7,500.21 BATTERIES
158844 BLACK & VEATCH $3,221.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-46
158845 BLACK BOX CORP $4,557.87 FIBER OPTIC CONVERTER
158846 BOOT BARN $96.87 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
158847 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $11,770.12 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18
158848 ROBERT B. BRESKIN $2,232.50 PERMIT FEE REFUND
158849 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $61.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
158850 CS COMPANY $712.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
158851 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $1,164.49 LAB SUPPLIES
158852 CALIFORNIA AUTO REFRIGERATION $357.20 REPAIR KITS
158853 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION, INC. $1,469.01 TRUCK BODY REPAIR
158854 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $120.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
158855 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $679.00 MOVING SERVICES
158856 CAMALI CORP. $1,200.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
158857 CANUS CORPORATION $37,298.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
158858 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $49,486.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95
158859 SUSAN W. CASE $165.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
158860 CATAPULT INC. $2,720.00 ON-SITE TRAINING
158861 MARK CASTILLO $3,038.97 EXPENSE REIMB.
158862 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $17,328.79 INSPECTION SERVICES
158863 CLEAN SOURCE $651.35 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
158864 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $8,328.70 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
158865 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2,007.38 PUMP PARTS
158866 COMPUTERS AMERICA $219.70 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
158867 COMPUSERVE $821.03 COMPUTER SERVICES
158868 CONDENSER & CHILLER SERVICE $1,275.00 SERVICE ANALYSIS
158869 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $116.31 TRUCK PARTS
158870 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL $8,309.60 ELECTRIC PARTS
158871 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,057.15 ENGINE PARTS
158872 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $74.60 TRUCK PARTS
158873 COUNTY CLERK $228.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
158874 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $3,065.67 ELECTRIC PARTS
158875 CHARLES P. CROWLEY, CO. $785.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS
158876 DELL MARKETING L. P. $46,595.42 COMPUTERS
158877 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $380.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS
158878 DIAMOND H RECOGNITION $270.15 SERVICE AWARDS
158879 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $3,596.00 INSPECTION SERVICES
158880 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $1,065.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
158881 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $105.16 PAINT SUPPLIES
~ 158882 EMA SERVICES INC $3,100.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
158883 ESP INDUSTRIES, INC. $130.86 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
158884 EATON CORP/CUTLER HAMMER $3,942.71 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
...... 158885 ELECT AIR $360.11 PNEUMATIC CYLINDERS rt 158886 ENCHANTER, INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95
~ 158887 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,181.55 LAB SERVICES
N 158888 JIM EVANS $2,597.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
158889 FAIRBANKS SCALES INC $3,885.83 SERVICE AGREEMENT
158890 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $380.36 FRAMES
158891 FIBERTRON $198.63 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
158892 BAILEY FISCHER & PORTER CO. $267.39 FILTERS
158893 FLICKINGER CO $239.66 VALVES
158894 FLORIDA CONVEYOR & EQUIP $11,714.71 POLY-ROLLER ASSY.
158895 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $256.02 PAINT SUPPLIES
158896 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $89.47 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES
158897 GCS SERVICE, INC. $137.13 TIMER
158898 GCOE $99.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
158899 GST, INC. $14,735.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES
158900 GTE COMMUNICATONS (FLOOR 3) $164,342.54 PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADES
158901 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,115.21 LUMBER/HARDWARE
158902 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $5,660.92 CHEMICALS
158903 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $952.50 REPAIR SCRUBBER TOWERS
158904 . GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,175.66 TELEPHONE SERVICES
158905 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $92.00 I PUBLICATION
158906 GRASSY S.T.I. $530.48 ENGINE PARTS
158907 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO., INC. $6,751.90 ELECTRICAL PARTS
158908 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $111.54 PRINTING
158909 DGA CONSULTANTS $950.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94
158910 HACH COMPANY $3,319.04 LAB SUPPLIES
........ .~
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
158911 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $2,484.19 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
158912 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $6,254.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
158913 PL HAWN CO, INC. $314.88 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
158914 LINDA HOLMES $2,312.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
158915 HOME DEPOT $63.46 SMALL HARDWARE
158916 HRDIRECT $123.34 LABOR LAW POSTERS
158917 RS HUGHES CO, INC. $87.77 PAINT SUPPLIES
158918 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,341.73 WATER USE
158919 IC ENGINE & EQUIP SERVICE $2,159.99 GENERATOR PARTS
158920 IPCOSAFETY $922.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES
158921 ISCO,INC. $49.39 INSTRUMENT
158922 IMAGING PLUS $594.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES
158923 IMAGING AND RECORDS MGMNT $200.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
158924 INORGANIC VENTURES $139.00 LAB SUPPLIES
158925 IAML $1,675.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
158926 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $677.15 BATTERIES
158927 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $2.90 WATER USE g 158928 JAMISON ENGINEERING $22,642.65 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
158929 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $2,412.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
b= 158930 JAY'S CATERING $440.69 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE
~· 158931 JENSEN TOOLS, INC. $226.28 OFFICE EQUIPMENT rt 158932 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $100.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 1' 158933 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $301.46 ELECTRIC PARTS
w 158934 TERRI JOSWAY $250.00 TRAINING EXPENSES
158935 KEENAN SUPPLY $590.21 WELDING SUPPLIES
158936 KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. $25,454.82 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95
158937 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $441.21 MACHINE SUPPLIES
158938 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $897.75 TOOLS
158939 VLADIMIR KOGAN $342.58 EXPENSE REIMB.
158940 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,618.73 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
158941 LAOUG (LA ORACLE USER GROUP) $495.00 MEMBERSHIP
158942 MDT $936.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
158943 MAC OM CO $455.55 SERVICE AGREEMENT
158944 MANDIC MOTORS $44.00 TOWING SERVICES
158945 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $1 ,406,500.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2
158946 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $490,980.23 CONSTRUCTION P1-41, P1-43
158947 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $68,018.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-40-2(REBID), P2-47-2(REBID)
158948 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $82.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
158949 MATT -CHLOR, INC. $201.86 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES
158950 MC INFO $10,460.67 COMPUTER HARDWARE
158951 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $120.88 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB.
158952 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $173.08 HEATER
158953 MELLON TRUST $15,227.10 INVESTMENT CUSTODIAN BANK
158954 MESA MUFFLER $137.75 TRUCK PARTS
158955 MICRON SPEARATION INC $58.34 LAB SUPPLIES
158956 MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING $2,732.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05114/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
158957 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,744.44 UNIFORM RENTALS
158958 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $3,020.06 CONST INSP TRAILER LEASE
158959 MORTON SALT AND/OR $1,405.47 SALT
158960 MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC. $442.15 PUMP PARTS
158961 NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S $69.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
158962 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP $451.28 TRAINING VIDEO'S
158963 NElWORK CATALYST, INC $9,417.27 COMPUTER HARDWARE
158964 NICKEY PETROLEUM CO., INC. $3,637.64 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
158965 SY NIELSON SERVICE INC $50.00 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION
158966 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $103.00 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE
158967 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,954.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES
158968 OMNI WESTERN INC $410.85 TOOLS
158969 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $185.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
158970 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,063.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
158971 ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. $1,007.56 FITTINGS
158972 OXYGEN SERVICE $3,980.20 SPECIAL TY GASES
158973 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,685.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
~ 158974 COUNTY OF ORANGE $280.00 PLAN CHECK FEES
158975 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $431.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
158976 PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. $2,554.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS ..... 158977 PACIFIC BELL $18.05 TELEPHONE SERVICES rt 158978 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $2,417.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES :r 158979 PASCAL & LUDWIG ENGINEERS $21,794.00 CONSTRUCTION J-33-2
~ 158980 PASCAL & LUDWIG, INC. $63,617.20 CONSTRUCTION P1-38-2
158981 CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY $500.81 REIMB. PETTY CASH
158982 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC. $83,986.48 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 3-29-95
158983 US FILTER I POL YMETRICS INC $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
158984 POL YPURE, INC. $26,771.02 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
158985 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
158986 PRYOR RESOURCES, INC. $158.95 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
158987 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $88.83 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
158988 HIPOTRONICS, INC. $59.59 FREIGHT CHARGE
158989 RJN GROUP, INC. $2,249.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
158990 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $3,533.93 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
158991 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $329.34 TRASH REMOVAL
158992 RAND MATERIALS HANDLING $142.80 FREIGHT CHARGE
158993 RD SYSTEMS INC $222.03 CAMERA REPAIR
158994 REAL TIME $3,044.40 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES
158995 RED WING SHOES $151.71 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
158996 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $334.03 VALVE
158997 REMEDY TEMP $10,297.82 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
158998 REVCO I LINDBERG $233.67 DISPLAY PANEL
158999 GEORGE ROBERTSON $834.94 EXPENSE REIMB.
159000 MARCY ROTHENBERG $1,695.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159001 RUTAN & TUCKER $10,296.00 LEGAL SERVICES
159002 SCOTT SPECIAL TY GASES, INC. $1,449.03 SPECIAL TY GASES
'-4'
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159003 SEWER EQUIP CO OF FLORIDA $7, 141.51 HOSE
159004 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,705.58 TOOLS
159005 SHURELUCK SALES $608.62 TOOLS/HARDWARE
159006 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,337.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94
159007 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $30.00 PERMIT FEES
159008 SO. CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $880.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
159009 SO. CALIF. WATER CO. $103.63 WATER USE
159010 SUCCESSORIES $520.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
159011 SUNSET FORD $189.11 TRUCK PARTS
159012 SUPELCO, INC. $1,032.89 LAB SUPPLIES
159013 SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $15,250.00 CONSTRUCTION
159014 SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $432,604.15 CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, P2-55
159015 SYMCAS, INC. $142.50 CONSULTING SERVICES
159016 TEKTRONIX, INC. $247.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159017 THERMO SEPERATION PRODUCTS $446.66 LAB SUPPLIES
159018 THERMO JARRELL ASH CORP $503.39 TRAINING PACKAGE
159019 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $10,986.32 MECHANICAL PARTS g 159020 TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE $330.59 LOCKS& KEYS
159021 EDWARD M. TORRES $300.55 EXPENSE REIMB.
b= 159022 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $3,139.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS ...... 159023 TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC . $722.90 TRUCK PARTS rt 159024 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $698.64 TRUCK PARTS :r 159025 TRUESDAIL LABS $1,811.00 LAB SERVICES
Ul 159026 JG TUCKER & SON, INC. $1,503.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159027 MICHELLE TUCHMAN $110.52 EXPENSE REIMB.
159028 TULE RANCH/MAGAN FARMS $38,620.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL
159029 DANIEL TUNNICLIFF $250.00 EXPENSE REIMB.
159030 TUSTIN DODGE $45.32 TRUCK PARTS
159031 UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $656.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159032 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $110.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE
159033 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,208.50 LAB SUPPLIES
159034 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,873.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159035 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $79.48 VALVE
159036 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC. $1,993.37 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
159037 VERNE'S PLUMBING $632.30 PLUMBING SERVICES
159038 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $1,672.77 FIBER OPTICS
159039 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,138.56 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
159040 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $220.00 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES
159041 WAXIE $136.13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159042 WEF $500.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
159043 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $22,768.99 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
159044 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $57.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
159045 WESTSIDE BLDG MATERIAL CORP $340.15 TOOLS
159046 XEROX CORP. $10,148.73 COPIER LEASES
159047 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $455.96 LAB SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 $3,839,204.01
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE 05/14/97
SUMMARY
#1 OPERFUND
#20PERFUND
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#30PERFUND
#3 CAP FAC FUND
#50PERFUND
#70PERFUND
#11 OPER FUND
#11 CAP FAC FUND
JTOPERFUND
CORF
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
$225.00
$422.50
$2,350.00
$10,187.42
$950.00
$27.15
$800.95
$2,382.63
$2,836.99
$394,580.99
$3,286,351.21
$138,089.17
$3,839,204.01
PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
' .... .._
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22/97 PAGE1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159070 AGX CORPORATION $424.06 GAUGE
159071 ABRASIVE ENG. TOOLING & EQUIP. $722.52 HARDWARE
159072 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $3,235.60 I LAB SUPPLIES
159073 AIR COLD SUPPLY, INC. $99.36 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS
159074 ALLIED PACKING & RUBBER INC $652.50 GASKETS
159075 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
159076 AMERICAN CRANE INSTITUTE $825.00 CRANE & MANLIFT TRAINING
159077 AMERICAN Dl~ITAL TECHNOLOGIES $6,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I
159078 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $1,245.00 PUBLICATION
159079 AMER SOC FOR QUALITY CONTROL $351.50 PUBLICATIONS
159080 AMETEK $78.33 CIRCUIT BOARD REPAIR
159081 LLOYD ANDERSON $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159082 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES $1,233.39 MACHINE SUPPLIES
159083 ARMOR-VAC $1,146.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
159084 ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS $24,413.12 SOFTWARE UPGRADES
~ 159085 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH, INC. $260.78 FILTER
159086 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159087 CYMANTHA ATKINSON $18.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
..... 159088 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO $214.42 AUTO SHOP SUPPLIES
rt 159089 AVIS CONTRACTOR LICENSE SVC CE $2,085.00 EXAM PREPARATION
tp 159090 BAYSHORE PSYCHOLOGY CENTER $125.00 SEMINAR FEE
~ 159091 BECWAR ENGINEERING $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159092 BELL PIPE & SUPPLY CO $502.22 VALVE PARTS
159093 BLACK BOX CORP $157.89 MODEM REPAIR
159094 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $5,259.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1 & P2-48
159095 BRENNER-FIEDLER & ASSOC., INC. 1330.32 GENERATORS
159096 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. 244.84 INSTRUMENT
159097 BUSH & ASSOCIATES, INC. $1,424.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94
159098 CPI -THE ALTERNATIVE $755.32 LAB SUPPLIES
159099 CS COMPANY $1,516.35 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159100 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $203.65 LAB SUPPLIES
159101 CALTROL, INC. $3,109.62 HARDWARE
159102 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $435.54 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159103 CALOL YMPIC GLOVE & SAFETY $3, 119.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES
159104 CAMALI CORP. $1,300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159105 CAMP DRESSER & MC KEE INC $15,938.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
159106 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $4,403.12 OFFICE FURNITURE
159107 CENTURY PAINT $121.93 PAINT SUPPLIES
159108 CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY $50.00 I PUBLICATION
159109 CLEAN SOURCE $450.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159110 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159111 COLE SCIENTIFIC, INC. $20.10 LAB SERVICES
159112 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $293.84 LAB SUPPLIES
159113 COLOR ARTS INC $1,749.75 VEHICLE DECALS
159114 COMMUNITY ACTION\ EAP $950.00 DISTRICT EAP -MAY 97
159115 COMPUTERS AMERICA $1,741.94 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122197 PAGE2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05128/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159116 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $485.52 ELECTRIC PARTS
159117 CONSUMER PIPE $4,397.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159118 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $7,702.97 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93
159119 DOUG COOK $140.30 EXPENSE REIMB.
159120 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $307.24 ENGINE PARTS
159121 CORPORATE EXPRESS $175.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159122 CUMMINS-ALLISON CORP $981.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
159123 CA DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES $3,119.00 MEMBERSHIP
159124 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $20,126.00 1ST QUARTER UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
159125 DCC/CAL INC $137.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159126 CHRISTOPHER DAHL $817.37 EXPENSE REIMB.
159127 DATA CLEAN CORP $2,910.00 EARTHQUAKE PROOFING
159128 JIM DAVIDSON $392.34 EXPENSE REIMB.
159129 TOM DAWES $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159130 DAYS INN HOTEL $545.80 HOTEL RESERVATIONS
~ 159131 DELL MARKETING L. P. $13,210.15 COMPUTERS
159132 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $34,449.24 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.0.1-12-94
~ 159133 DELTA INTERNET SERVICES, INC. $100.00 DOMAIN SET-UP FEE ..... 159134 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,583.99 OFFICE EQUIPMENT rt 159135 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $515.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES
tJj 159136 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $3,480.00 INSPECTION SERVICES ·Ii
l\J 159137 ROBERT DUMITY $713.76 EXPENSE REIMB.
159138 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,001.25 PAINT SUPPLIES
159139 ESP INDUSTRIES, INC. $456.06 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
159140 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $150.65 TRUCK PARTS
159141 J.D. EDWARDS $29,177.30 SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7-24-96
159142 EL-COM HARDWARE $81.62 FAN
159143 ELECTRA-BOND, INC. $1,621.64 REPAIR
159144 KENNETH J EMANUELS & ASSOC $16,500.00 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATE SERVICES
159145 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $900.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
159146 ENCHANTER, INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95
159147 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,030.35 LAB SERVICES
159148 JIM EVANS $4,519.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159149 EXCALIBUR ENTERPRISES $95.97 VIDEO CAMERA ADAPTER
159150 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $486.33 AIRFREIGHT
159151 FIBERTRON $2,754.23 FIBER OPTIC CABLE
159152 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $733.30 FILTERS
159153 FIRST CHOICE $1,236.56 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
159154 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $4,729.43 LAB SUPPLIES
159155 FLO-SYSTEMS $531.10 PUMP PARTS
159156 FORD TRUCK PARTS $431.00 TRUCK PARTS
159157 FORMA SCIENTIFIC, INC. $10,108.81 LAB EQUIPMENT
159158 FORKERT ENGINEERING & SURVEY $570.83 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 6-8-94
159159 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $146.91 PHOTO SUPPLIES
159160 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,806.83 PAINT SUPPLIES
159161 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $338.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES . t
... .,-.
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22/97 PAGE3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159162 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $144.28 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES
159163 GKK CORPORATION $498.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159164 GST, INC. $7,941.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159165 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE $110.00 PERMIT FEE
159166 GARTNER GROUP, INC. $1,185.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS
159167 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $166.34 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
159168 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,544.58 TELEPHONE SERVICES
159169 N. GLANTZ & SON INC. $207.72 TOOLS
159170 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $88.00 PUBLICATIONS
159171 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $930.70 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
159172 GRASBY S.T.I. $505.24 ENGINE PARTS
159173 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $2,680.65 PRINTING
159174 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,692.91 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94
159175 HACH COMPANY $51.92 LAB SUPPLIES
159176 HAESTAD METHODS $295.00 SOFTWARE
~ 159177 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.868.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159178 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW $85.00 SUBSCRIPTION
159179 PL HAWN CO, INC. $16.97 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
I-'· 159180 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $4,151.50 CONSULTING SERVICES rt 159181 HIGHLANDER LAUNDROMAT $179.19 PERMIT FEE REFUND tJj 159182 HILTl, INC. $530.13 TOOLS I w 159183 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF., INC. $187.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS
159184 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $335.75 LAB SUPPLIES
159185 HUNSAKER & ASSOC IRVINE, INC. $600.59 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159186 JOHN HUNT $5,420.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-44-3
159187 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $780.00 WATER USE
159188 IPCOSAFETY $27,159.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES
159189 IMAGING PLUS $227.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159190 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFGS $2,462.82 FILTERS
159191 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $207.05 CONNECTORS
159192 INORGANIC VENTURES $244.81 LAB SUPPLIES
159193 INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED MGMT $1,575.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
159194 INTERSTATE BATIERY SYSTEMS $926.05 BATTERIES
159195 INTERSTATE ENGINEERING $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159196 ISCO, INC. $792.61 INSTRUMENT
159197 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $310.32 PRINTING
159198 JAMISON ENGINEERING $5,910.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
159199 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,286.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159200 JAY'S CATERING $735.22 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE
159201 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $172.64 GAUGE
159202 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,732.05 ELECTRIC PARTS
159203 KAISER PERMANENTE $43,223.37 INSURANCE PREMIUM
159204 DIONNE KARDOS $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159205 KELAR CORPORATION $2,880.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
159206 KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC. $86,174.01 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95
159207 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4,285.33 TOOLS
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159208 DUSTIN LE $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159209 DAVID A LUDWIN $153.00 EXPENSE REIMB.
159210 MPS $686.11 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
159211 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159212 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOC $70.00 MEMBERSHIP
159213 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,507.69 WELDING SUPPLIES
159214 MANTEK $321.99 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
159215 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $662.83 VALVE PARTS
159216 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $22.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
159217 MIKE MCCARTHY $399.52 EXPENSE REIMB.
159218 DONALD F. MCINTYRE $69.32 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB.
159219 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $1,794.21 TOOLS
159220 CHARLES MCRANEY $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159221 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $2,940.94 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
159222 METRA HEAL TH $114,457.98 INSURANCE PREMIUMS
~ 159223 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $5,668.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
159224 MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING $11,431.51 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
159225 PORTIA MINA $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
~· 159226 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $344.80 OFFICE TRAILER LEASE
rt 159227 MONTGOMERY WATSON $6,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 2-26-97
tp 159228 MICHAEL D. MOORE $1,181.50 EXPENSE REIMB.
~ 159229 MOTEL SIX #34 $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159230 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC $1,137.68 ELECTRICAL PARTS
159231 MOTOROLA, INC. $893.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159232 SAM MOWBRAY $188.47 EXPENSE REIMB.
159233 NADINE'S LAUNDRY $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159234 NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHOPS $139.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
159235 NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS $5,233.10 ELECTRICAL PARTS
159236 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $758.14 EXTERIOR METAL LEITERS
159237 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $9,217.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159238 NElWORK CATALYST, INC $62,916.30 COMPUTER HARDWARE
159239 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE
159240 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE $26,658.68 SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE
159241 NWLAND/OR $12,986.21 LIFE INSURANCE
159242 01 CORPORATION $181.02 LAB SUPPLIES
159243 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $386.93 SAFETY GLASSES
159244 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $3,047.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159245 OMEGA CORPORATION $153, 145.35 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
159246 OMNI WESTERN INC $235.62 TOOLS
159247 ORACLE CORPORATION $1,600.00 SOFTWARE
159248 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $187.68 PUMP PARTS
159249 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $4,074.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
159250 COUNTY OF ORANGE $23,473.58 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
159251 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $41,942.97 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
159252 COUNTY OF ORANGE $66.00 PERMIT FEE
159253 PSI $646.50 HARDWARE
.. -.. ~ .,
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122197 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05128/97 POSTING DA TE 05/28/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159254 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $122,470.00 INVESTMENT MGMT. SERVICE RES 95-75
159255 PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. $602.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159256 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. $1,379.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
159257 PACIFIC BELL $1,275.50 TELEPHONE SERVICES
159258 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $1,611.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159259 PAGENET $589.43 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
159260 PAINE WEBBER $60,848.44 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT
159261 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $447.31 AIR REGULATOR
159262 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159263 PARTS UNLIMITED $831.15 TRUCK PARTS
159264 PERMASEAL $5,087.94 LUBE OIL
159265 CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY $2,099.66 REIMB. PETTY CASH
159266 JERRI Pl $46.65 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159267 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,025.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
159268 MIKE PRLICH & SONS $518,068.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-35R-1
~ 159269 RM CONTROLS $50.72 PLOTIERPENS
159270 R & R INSTRUMENTS $549.70 ELECTRIC PARTS
159271 REAL TIME $255.00 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES ..... 159272 THE REGISTER $200.00 NOTICES & ADS
rt 159273 LAWRENCE ROOD $79.26 DEDUCTION REIMB.
tp 159274 SAVANT $2,017.60 LAB SUPPLIES
U1 159275 R. CRAIG seen & ASSOC. $22,164.30 LEGAL SERVICES -PERSONNEL ISSUES
159276 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,215.42 LAB SUPPLIES
159277 SEARS $486.79 TOOLS
159278 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO $1,016.69 REFRIGERATOR
159279 SECOND-SUN $281.39 OFFICE FURNITURE
159280 SERPENTIX CORPORATION $6,558.58 NYLON ROLLER ASSEMBLY
159281 STUART SEVERN $893.66 EXPENSE REIMB.
159282 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,603.56 TOOLS
159283 SHURELUCK SALES $2,267.81 TOOLS/HARDWARE
159284 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $130.00 PROBE
159285 SMITH-EMERY CO. $5,402.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-13-94
159286 SNAP ON I SUN CORP $608.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
159287 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1,315.84 TOOLS
159288 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO $46,030.36 POWER
159289 SO CALIF EDISON CO $30,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15-95
159290 SO. CAL. GAS. CO. $20,328.71 NATURAL GAS
159291 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,084.94 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
159292 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO., INC. $250.00 METER
159293 SPRINT $32.70 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
159294 SRECO FLEXIBLE $175.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
159295 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $539.67 LAB SUPPLIES
159296 STRATEGIC FRAMEWORKS, INC. $12,180.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159297 SUNSET FORD $771.18 TRUCK PARTS
159298 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $143.55 HOSE
159299 SUPERB QNE-HOUR PHOTO $24.43 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122197 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28197 POSTING DA TE 05128/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159300 SYMCAS1 INC. $878.75 CONSUL TING SERVICES
159301 T J SAUSAGE KITCHEN INC $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159302 TEL-A-TRAIN INC. $6,529.50 TRAINING VIDEO TAPES
159303 TELEDYNE $1,248.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159304 TEST EQUITY. INC. $1,947.72 POWER SUPPLY
159305 THOMAS BROS MAPS $210.00 PRINTING
159306 TERRY THROOP $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB.
159307 TORNELL & COTTEN $2,219.00 LEGAL FEES
159308 TOXGAURD SYSTEMS, INC. $1,995.00 REPAIR STORAGE TANK MONITORS
159309 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $173.41 TRUCK PARTS
159310 TRUESDAIL LABS $992.00 LAB SERVICES
159311 JG TUCKER & SON, INC. $2,679.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159312 UNIRULE INDUSTRIES $28.94 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159313 UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER $93.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159314 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $331.07 PARCEL SERVICES
~ 159315 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE
159316 UNOCAL CORPORATION $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159317 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $213.00 LAB SUPPLIES
I-'· 159318 U S POSTAL SERVICE $5,000.00 POSTAGE rt 159319 VWR SCIENTIFIC $865.68 LAB SUPPLIES tp 159320 TONY VALENZUELA $150.00 EXPENSE REIMB.
°' 159321 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $667.45 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159322 VERNE'S PLUMBING $880.22 PLUMBING SERVICES
159323 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $144.84 FIBER OPTICS
159324 VISION SERVICE PLAN -(CA) $7,644.00 VISION INSURANCE PREMIUM
159325 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $392.00 BUILDING REPAIRS
159326 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,130.56 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
159327 WATERS CORPORATION $5,415.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159328 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY $1,905.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159329 WEKA PUBLISHING, INC. $145.50 PUBLICATION
159330 WELLS SUPPLY CO. $1,171.02 VALVES
159331 WEMAC DIV OF PURITAN-BENNETT $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND
159332 WESTERN BUSINESS SYSTEMS $938.29 PAYROLL CHECK STOCK
159333 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1,312.90 FILTERS
159334 NANCY WHEATLEY $1,207.00 EXPENSE REIMB.
159335 JUDITH A. WILSON $70.89 CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES REIMB.
159336 WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART $116,330.24 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95
159337 XEROX CORP. $9,527.70 COPIER LEASES
159338 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $567.88 LAB SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 $2,043,472.53
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 05/28/97 POSTING DATE 05/28/97
SUMMARY
#1 OPERFUND
#1 CONST FUND
#20PERFUND
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#2 CONST FUND
#30PERFUND
#3 CAP FAC FUND
#3 CONST FUND
#50PERFUND
#5 CAP FAC FUND
#5 CONST FUND
#60PERFUND
#6 CONST FUND
#70PERFUND
#7 CAP FAC FUND
#7 CONST FUND
#11 OPER FUND
#11 CAP FAC FUND
#11 CONST FUND
#13 OPER FUND
#13 CAP FAC FUND
#14 CONST FUND
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND
#6&7 OPER FUND
#7&14 OPER FUND
JTOPERFUND
CORF
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
$2,057.52
$8,018.96
$13,957.76
$600.59
$20,469.16
$9,021.35
$519,689.47
$18,632.05
$1,379.31
$7,702.97
$4,300.00
$1,272.33
$2,183.38
$3,866.43
$2,639.18
$4,025.93
$2,613.21
$1,158.70
$2,705.33
$347.41
$74.53
$438.43
$498.40
$216.49
$17.18
$386,016.11
$355,312.70
$93,582.37
$580,675.28
$2,043,472.53
.. '· "
PROCESSING DATE 05/22197 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO.
06/12197 159659
06/19/97 159676
06/19/97 1596n
06/24/97 159945
06/25/97 159946
06/25/97 159947
~ .....
rt
()
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID -MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS
VENDOR
FORTIS BENEFITS INS. CO.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO
BANK OF AMERICA
BANK OF AMERICA
NElWORKCATALYST, INC
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID
SUMMARY
#11 OPER FUND
JTOPERFUND
CORF
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
$17,410.87
$5,318.89
$47,020.74
$138.75
$138.75
$58,364.94
$128,392.94
AMOUNT
$1,670.20
$50,669.43
$58,364.94
$17,688.37
$128,392.94
PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE
POWER
POWER
BANKING SERVICES
BANKING SERVICES
SOFlWARE
·• . ...
' --'~ ----
For Bd, ~ec. Us~ Onlk'. AGENDA ' 0 COMM. INFO. ITEM
0 COMM. ACTION ITEM ITEM
0 JT. BOS. CONSENT TRANSMITTAL 0 JT. BOS. DISCUSSION
(NON-CONSENn
0 PUBLIC HEARING
gfa11/aJT. BOS. MEETING DATE
f_ :
JT. BOS. AGENDA ITEM NO.
MEETING DATE COMM. ID. NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION
OMTS: OMTS (Originator)
PDC: PDC
FAHR: FAHR 2220 I Ross H. Tipps I 2558
EXEC: EXEC
STEER: STEER Division No., Name, and Extension
JT.BDS: 08127197
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
RATIFYING PAYMENTOF CLAIMS OF THE JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS BY ROLL CALL VOTE
(each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District
represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District).
Recommended Action(s):
1. Staff recommends approval of payment of claims/warrant listing.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES NO NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC
Date Notice of Exemption Filed: ITEM:
Negative Declaration Approved on
Final EIR Approved on _ and Notice of Determination filed on_
CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR-YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET
INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
EXPENDITURES (Total Budget plus
Transfers)
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ NIA NIA NIA NIA
SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS
Schedule/Line Items:
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL
INFORMATION BUDGET TOTAL CHANGES THISAIT PROJECT
BUDGET
First Year in Budget: $0.00
Master Plan Estimate:
Year of First Costs:
THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED
INFORMATION PO, CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT
AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT
$0.00
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES NO NOT APPLICABLE
If YES, state number: _ Permanent -Limited Term If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
Revised 05114197
H:\WP.DTA\FIN\2220\TIPPS\AIT.WPD
Page 1 of 2
Signature Date
Assistant General Manager (Or Designee)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
Revised 05/14197
H:\WP.DTA\FIN\2220\TIPPS\AIT.WPD
ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List)
1.
Page 2 of2
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159365
159366
159367
159368
159369
159370
159371
159372
159373
159374
159375
159376
159377
159378
159379
159380
159381
159382
159383
159384
159385
159386
159387
159388
159389
159390
159391
159392
159393
159394
159395
159396
159397
159398
159399
159400
159401
159402
159403
159404
159405
159406
159407
159408
159409
159410
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97
VENDOR
A & D PARTY RENTAL
ADS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
AMA/KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER
ROMA SALES COMPANY INC.
ASTD (AM SOC FOR TRNG & DVLPT)
ASTD PUBLISHING SERVICE
AT & T -MEGACOM SERVICE
AT & T -CELLULAR CR & R
AT & T -PRO WATTS
AT & T -MEGACOM SERVICE
AT & T -CELLULAR CR & R
AWSI
ACOPIAN CORP
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC
AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS
ALADDIN HOUSE
ALLIED ELECTRONICS
AMERICAN AIR FILTER, INC.
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN SIGMA
AMSA/KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER
BLAKE P. ANDERSON
ACS (APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION)
ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC.
ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV.
BANANA BLUEPRINT
BAR TECH TELECOM, INC.
BATTERY SPECIALTIES
BELL PIPE & SUPPLY CO
BERENDSEN FLUID POWER
BIO-GRO DIVISION
BLACK BOX CORP
BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE
BORLAND INTERNATIONAL
BRENNER-FIEDLER & ASSOC., INC.
BUDGET JANITORIAL
BNIBOOKS
CCI TECHNOLOGIES
CS COMPANY
CALIF WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOC.
CALIF MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL
CAL TROL, INC.
CALOLYMPIC GLOVE & SAFETY
CATAPULT
CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT.
CHAPMAN COUNSELING
AMOUNT
$238.30
$13,000.00
$9,442.00
$35,600.00
$229.00
$150.00
$2,961.65
$1.64
$299.51
$843.30
$25.58
$1,839.41
$803.40
$411,843.60
$37,332.90
$3,500.00
$417.42
$6,190.75
$310.00
$10,736.95
$425.00
$307.40
$872.78
$628.00
$120.00
$3,239.65
$567.00
$811.13
$267.01
$30.74
$69,757.33
$2,162.40
$150.00
$1,095.76
$660.64
$3,085.00
$316.06
$1,638.63
$4,775.54
$93.88
$59.00
$958.04
$2,579.00
$2,720.00
$10,448.33
$7,285.00
PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
LEGISLATORS DAY RENTALS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TRAINING REGISTRATIONS
FUEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
MEMBERSHIP
PUBLICATION
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
D.O.T. TRAINING PROGRAM
POWER SUPPLY
CONSTRUCTION J-34-1, P2-35-5
O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN. SYST. M.0.8-9-89
VERTICAL BLINDS
FANS
MECHANICAL PARTS
VIEDO TAPE-CLEAN WATER ACT
MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
REIMBURSE EXPENSES
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
WASTE OIL REMOVAL
PRINTING M.0.11-07-94
TELEPHONE INSTALLATION
BATTERIES
COUPLER
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95
FIBER OPTIC CONVERTER
TRUCK REPAIRS
COMPUTER PARTS
GENERATORS
JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94
BOOKS
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
SOFTWARE
SUBSCRIPTION
HARDWARE
SAFETY SUPPLIES
ON-SITE TRAINING
OFFICE FURNITURE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
< J ,..
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159411
159412
159413
159414
159415
159416
159417
159418
159419
159420
159421
159422
159423
159424
159425
159426
159427
159428
159429
159430
159431
159432
159433
159434
159435
159436
159437
159438
159439
159440
159441
159442
159443
159444
159445
159446
159447
159448
159449
159450
159451
159452
159453
159454
159455
159456
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97
VENDOR
CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT
CLOSSON & CLOSSON
COAST RUBBER STAMP
COLE·PARMER INSTRUMENT CO.
COMPPLUS
COMPUCOM SYSTEMS
COMPUSA, INC.
COMPUSERVE
CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV.
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST
CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS
CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO
COOPER CAMERON CORP.
COPELCO CAPITAL
CORE LABORATORIES, INC.
CORPORATE EXPRESS
CORNELL MARITIME PRESS &
COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY
COASTAL CONSERVANCY
COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER
CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS
WILBUR C. CRIDLEBAUGH
CSUS FOUNDATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CA WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOC.
DWG ASSOCIATES
THE DARTNELL CORP
DAVE'S BICYCLES, INC.
DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO.
DELL MARKETING L. P.
DENNY'S RESTAURANT #136
DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION
DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY
ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOC
MARC DUBOIS
DUNN EDWARDS CORP.
ENS RESOURCES INC
EDISONITAC
EDWARDS DIV. OF GS BLDG SYS.
EMPLOYER ADVISORY COUNCIL
ENCHANTER, INC.
DARRELL ENNIS
FAIRBANKS SCALES INC
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.
FILTER SUPPLY CO.
AMOUNT
$11,271.29
$1,060.50
$92.92
$281.09
$2,730.00
$3,359.22
$651.72
$922.36
$17.81
$3,277.60
$1,010.13
$425.04
$7,998.88
$1,432.00
$800.00
$409.14
$24.95
$235.68
$18.00
$1,254.43
$738.49
$11,050.00
$10.05
$107.75
$848.00
$195.00
$1,980.00
$82.06
$143.89
$377.65
$9,004.67
$75.00
$3,248.00
$1,065.00
$21,104.00
$206.18
$663.50
$928.93
$1,280.00
$352.63
$80.00
$2,100.00
$250.00
$240.00
$82.12
$12,632.35
PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
INSPECTION SERVICES
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMPUTER PARTS
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
COMPUTER SERVICES
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRIC PARTS
FREIGHT
CRANE RENTAL
ENGINE PARTS
COLOR COPIER LEASE
LAB SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PUBLICATION
TRUCK PARTS
SUBSCRIPTION
ELECTRIC PARTS
VIDEO
CONSUL TING SERVICES
OVERPAYMENT REFUND
PUBLICATIONS
VERIFICATION & MANIFEST FEES
ADVERTISEMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SUBSCRIPTION
BIKE REPAIRS
TRUCK PARTS
COMPUTERS
PERMIT FEE REFUND
INSPECTION SERVICES
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
EXCESS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
FIS TRAINING EXPENSE REIMB.
PAINT SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TRAINING REGISTRATION
• SERVICE AGREEMENT
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95
CASH ADVANCE
SERVICE AGREEMENT
AIRFREIGHT
FILTERS
.£_·' ~I
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159457 FIRST CHOICE $379.39 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
159458 BAILEY FISCHER & PORTER CO $897.13 CHLORINATION SUPP.LIES
159459 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $118.53 LAB SUPPLIES
159460 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $323.14 PHOTO SUPPLIES
159461 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $11,552.40 WATER USE
159462 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $800.00 PERMIT FEE
159463 THE FOXBORO CO. $2,982.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
159464 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $7,422.80 OFFICE PRODUCTIVITY SUPPLIES
159465 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $140.02 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES
159466 CITY OF FULLERTON $138.01 WATER USE
159467 GST, INC. $11,785.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES
159468 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $86.06 LUMBER/HARDWARE
159469 GARTNER GROUP $95.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
159470 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $620.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
159471 GENERAL PETROLEUM $8,563.10 UNLEADED GASOLINE
159472 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,210.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES
159473 GIGA INFORMATION GROUP $6,000.00 RESEARCH SERVICES
159474 GOLDENWEST WINDOWS $2,543.00 STEAM CLEANING OF BUILDINGS
159475 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $85.00 PUBLICATION
159476 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2,131.30 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
159477 GRASSY S.T.I. $1,583.11 ENGINE PARTS
159478 GRAYBAR $72.26 ELECTRICAL PARTS
159479 DGA CONSULTANTS $2,965.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94
159480 HB TYPE & GRAPHICS $1, 131.37 PRINTING
159481 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $662.00 TRUCK PARTS
159482 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $594.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
159483 HATCH & KIRK, INC. $2,093.93 TRUCK PARTS
159484 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,821.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
159485 Pl HAWN CO, INC. $233.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
159486 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
159487 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $595.50 CONSUL TING SERVICES
159488 HILTl, INC. $127.19 TOOLS
159489 HOLMES & NARVER, INC. $3,575.06 ENGINEERING SERVICES
159490 HOME DEPOT $1,299.36 SMALL HARDWARE
159491 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,343.39 WATER USE
159492 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO $1,265.77 FINAL USER RECONCILIATION REFUND
159493 IBM $324.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
159494 IPCOSAFETY $4,408.38 SAFETY SUPPLIES
159495 ISCO, INC. $5,392.03 INSTRUMENT
159496 ISi INFORTEXT $856.61 SUBSCRIPTION
159497 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $19.04 CONNECTORS
159498 INTELLIGENCE PRESS, INC. $687.00 SUBSCRIPTION
159499 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $13.43 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
159500 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $54.84 WATER USE
159501 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $495.65 PRINTING
159502 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $339.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159503
159504
159505
159506
159507
159508
159509
159510
159511
159512
159513
159514
159515
159516
159517
159518
159519
159520
159521
159522
159523
159524
159525
159526
159527
159528
159529
159530
159531
159532
159533
159534
159535
159536
159537
159538
159539
159540
159541
159542
159543
159544
159545
159546
159547
159548
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97
VENDOR
JENDHAM INC
JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO.
JENSEN TOOLS, INC.
JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
TERRI JOSWAY
KAHL SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC.
APPLtED INDUSTRIAL TECH
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES
LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO.
LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
LAKEWOOD PUBLICATIONS
LASERALL CORP.
LAW/CRANDAL, INC.
LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
LEWIS, D'AMATO, BRISBOIS
K.P. LINDSTROM, INC.
MPS
MSTFASTPRO
MACOMCO
MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP.
MANHOLE ADJUSTING
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
MARVAC ELECTRONICS
MASUNE COMPANY
MCJUNKIN CORP
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING
MILLIPORE CORP.
MILLTRONICS
MISSION INDUSTRIES
MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO.
MONITOR LABS
MOTOROLA, INC.
JAMES MULLINS
NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP
NEAL SUPPLY CO.
NETWORK CATALYST, INC
NEW ENGLAND WATER ENV. ASSOC.
NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS, INC.
OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION
THE OHMART CORP
ORACLE CORPORATION
AMOUNT
$676.00
$2,115.67
$66.84
$202.39
$109.68
$2,039.51
$1,091.76
$154,345.10
$32.40
$773.98
$1,259.66
$60.25
$78.00
$103.00
$2,771.98
$43,479.26
$453.64
$13,879.52
$80.34
$888.71
$464.10
$871.82
$9,000.00
$488,433.00
$267, 157.10
$177,970.00
$152.64
$1,120.45
$285.32
$71.42
$4,960.00
$176.00
$166.20
$5,973.57
$637.00
$465.71
$4,809.96
$329.49
$219.42
$875.88
$24,422.59
$5.00
$360.00
$2,398.59
$262.26
$8,474.54
PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
TRAINING REGISTRATION
GAUGE
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
TRUCK REPAIRS
ELECTRIC PARTS
EXPENSE REIMB.
SCALES
FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95
MACHINE SUPPLIES
TOOLS
CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
CHEMICALS
SUBSCRIPTION
PRINTER REPAIR
SOIL TESTING 7-13-94
ENGINEERING SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
ENVIR. CONSUL TING SERVICES MO 12-9-90
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SERVICE AGREEMENT
WELDING SUPPLIES
REMOVE & REPLACE MANHOLES
CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2
CONSTRUCTION P1-41, P1-43
CONSTRUCTION P1-40-2(REBID), P2-47-2(REBID)
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
FIRST AID KITS
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
TOOLS
MECHANICAL REPAIRS
LAB SUPPLIES
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
UNIFORM RENTALS
INSTRUMENT
INSTRUMENT
INSTRUMENT PARTS
EXPENSE REIMB.
TRAINING VIDEO
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
PUBLICATION
SOFlWARE TRAINING CLASSES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRAINING VIDEO
SOFlWARE
c{ ,,
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGES
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
159549 ORACLE CORPORATION $3,636.00 SOFTWARE
159550 ORANGE COAST PIPE SUPPLY $183.77 PIPE SUPPLIES
159551 ORANGE COUNTY COMPENSATION $35.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
159552 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR & EXPO CTR $75.00 EXHIBIT SPACE FEE
159553 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $878.99 CHEMICALS
159554 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $1,869.52 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
159555 ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO. $238.41 FITTINGS
159556 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,778.05 SPECIAL TY GASES
159557 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4,650.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
159558 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $28,658.00 GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93
159559 PBAS $15.00 AUDIO TRAINING TAPE
159560 PSI $116.97 HARDWARE
159561 PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC. $20,385.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS
159562 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. $4,392.43 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
159563 PACIFIC BELL $53.88 TELEPHONE SERVICES
159564 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $333.81 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
159565 PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC. $187.09 TIRES
159566 PARTS UNLIMITED $40.93 TRUCK PARTS
159567 R.F. PAULUS, INC $71,298.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-7A
159568 PENN WILSON, GNG $100,597.98 CNG FUELING STATION MO 1/24/96
159569 CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY $446.76 REIMB. PETTY CASH
159570 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC. $170,544.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 3-29-95
159571 PITNEY BOWES $4.417.75 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
159572 US FILTER/POL YMETRICS INC $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES
159573 POL YPURE, INC. $46,045.12 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
159574 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. $24.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
159575 POWER SYSTEMS $29.11 SPRING
159576 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES
159577 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $3,857.00 SOILS TESTING
159578 PUTZMEISTER, INC. $1,589.41 PUMP PARTS
159579 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $687.31 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
159580 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $478.25 LAB SUPPLIES
159581 RANCHO AUTO WASH $378.00 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
159582 REAL TIME $2,386.00 INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES
159583 RED WING SHOES $241.37 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
159584 BOLT DELIVERY $103.00 FREIGHT
159585 THE REGISTER $452.80 NOTICES & ADS
159586 REISH MARINE STUDIES, INC. $200.00 OCEAN MONITORING
159587 REMEDY TEMP $27,425.86 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
159588 RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL $15.00 PUBLICATION
159589 SARNOFF DEPOSITION SERVICE, INC $392.00 DEPOSITION SERVICES
159590 SAVAtfr AUDIO VISUAL $359.80 PUBLICATION
159591 SCHWING AMERICA, INC. $572.06 PUMP PARTS
159592 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT'L $31,142.54 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-8-94
159593 SCIENTIFIC REFRIGERATION $160.00 SERVICE CALL
159594 SCOTT SPECIAL TY GASES, INC. $478.33 SPECIAL TY GASES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159595
159596
159597
159598
159599
159600
159601
159602
159603
159604
159605
159606
159607
159608
159609
159610
159611
159612
159613
159614
159615
159616
159617
159618
159619
159620
159621
159622
159623
159624
159625
159626
159627
159628
159629
159630
159631
159632
159633
159634
159635
159636
159637
159638
159639
159640
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97
VENDOR
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
SEARS ROEBUCK & CO
SECOND-SUN
SHAMROCK SUPPLY
SIEMON, LARSEN & MARSH
SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC.
SKILL PATH SEMINARS
SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY
SNAP·ON TOOLS CORP.
SO CALIF A/C DISTRIBUTORS
SO CALIF EDISON CO
STAMINET INC
STANDARD SUPP & EQUIP CO INC
STEVEN ENTERPRISES
STREET SMART
SUCCESSORIES
SUMMIT STEEL
SUNSET FORD
SUPELCO, INC.
SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO
SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
SUPERIOR PLATING
SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC.
TPC TRAINING SYSTEMS
THOMAS SCIENTIFIC
THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS
TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE
TORNELL & COTTEN
TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL
TRADE SERVICE CORP
TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY, INC.
TROPITONJ: FURNITURE
TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC.
TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY
TRUESOAIL LABS
JG TUCKER & SON, INC.
TULE RANCH/MAGAN FARMS
DANIEL TUNNICLIFF
TURBINE SPECIALTIES INC
TUTHILL CORPORATION
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
WIR SCIENTIFIC
VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO. INC.
VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO.
AMOUNT
$75.90
$360.04
$213.57
$471.56
$1,999.53
$3,740.00
$725.00
$198.00
$180.78
$1,841.36
$102.36
$50,072.46
$3,847.77
$135.25
$663.52
$2,564.45
$570.63
$9,746.86
$2,326.85
$1,081.02
$41.24
$175.00
$458.89
$7 40,570.40
$249.91
$189.84
$3,377.75
$36.78
$358.53
$916.00
$3,208.82
$1,925.28
$450.00
$670.00
$169.39
$20.56
$1,007.00
$2,173.32
$86,377.87
$1,249.39
$13,413.56
$216.14
$63.68
$13,733.78
$88.75
$533.36
PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
WATER USE
WATER USE
MICROWAVE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TOOLS
LEGAL SERVICES
LAB SUPPLIES
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
TOOLS
PUBLICATION
POWER
PRINTERS
OVERHAUL KIT
REPAIR
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
FRAMES
METAL
TRUCK PARTS
LAB SUPPLIES
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
SUBSCRIPTION
OVERPAYMENT REFUND
CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, P2-55
TRAINING SOFTWARE
IMAGING CHAMBER
MECHANICAL PARTS
CABLE SERVICES
LOCKS&KEYS
LEGAL SERVICES
INSTRUMENT PARTS
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94
REFUND
TRUCK PARTS
TRUCK PARTS
LAB SERVICES
INSTRUMENT PARTS
RESIDUALS REMOVAL
EXPENSE REIMB.
TURBINE MAINTENANCE
TURBINE SUPPLIES
PARCEL SERVICES
LAB SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159641
159642
159643
159644
159645
159646
159647
159648
159649
159650
159651
159652
159653
159654
159655
159656
159657
159658
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97 POSTING DATE 06/11/97
VENDOR
VALVATE ASSOCIATES
VARKEL CONSTRUCTION INC.
VERTEX BUSINESS INTERIORS
VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
WACKENHUT CORP.
WATERS CORPORATION
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT
WESTERN CITY MAGAZINE
WESTERN MEDICAL CENTER
WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY
WHATMAN
WILLARD MARKING DEVICES INC.
WITEG
XEROX CORP.
YALE/CHASE MATERIAL HANDLING
GEORGE YARDLEY CO.
ZEE SERVICE CO
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/11/97
SUMMARY
#1 OPERFUND
#20PERFUND
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#30PERFUND
#3 CAP FAC FUND
#50PERFUND
#SOPER FUND
#70PERFUND
#11 OPER FUND
#11 CAP FAC FUND
#5&6 OPER FUND
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND
#6&7 OPER FUND
#7&14 OPER FUND
JTOPERFUND
CORF
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
$2,864.10
$27,076.50
$318.82
$1,078.96
$8,955.88
$624.58
$384.69
$946.55
$63.00
$502.12
$35,541.60
$502.06
$40.30
$667.57
$3,955.55
$664.86
$582.49
$466.02
$3,654,453.98
AMOUNT
$253.80
$5,298.01
$71,421.28
$29,417.33
$3,701.09
$2,671.68
$1,323.93
$3,885.38
$5,068.12
$20.18
$4,276.82
$50.61
$1,904.83
$3,856.22
$867,353.30
$2,434, 124.01
$24,032.97
$195, 794.42
$3,654,453.98
PROCESSING DATE 06/09/97 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
VALVE
CONSTRUCTION J-11-2
OFFICE FURNITURE
FIBER OPTICS
CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
SERVICE AGREEMENT
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
WIND SOC SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION
RECONCILIATION REFUND
CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
GENERATOR MAINTENANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
COPIER LEASES
YOKE ASSEMBLY
LAB SUPPLIES
FIRST AID KITS
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159678
159679
159680
159681
159682
159683
159684
159685
159686
159687
159688
159689
159690
159691
159692
159693
159694
159695
159696
159697
159698
159699
159700
159701
159702
159703
159704
159705
159706
159707
159708
159709
159710
159711
159712
159713
159714
159715
159716
159717
159718
159719
159720
159721
159722
159723
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97
VENDOR
AMS (ACOUSTICAL MAIL SERV)
ARMA INTERNATIONAL
AT & T,. .CELLULAR CR & R
AT & T -CELLULAR CR & R
AT & T -CELLULAR CR & R
ADVANCED WORKPLACE STRATEGIES, INC.
A'WNA
ACADEMIC PRESS
AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP.
AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS
ALLIED PACKING & RUBBER INC
ALPHA RESEARCH GROUP
AMERICAN COMPENSATION ASSOC
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
ASSOC. OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES
ANTHONY PEST CONTROL
APEX COMMUNICATONS
A-PLUS SYSTEMS
ACS (APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION)
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES
ARIZONA INSTRUMENT
AWARDS & TROPHIES
BALLANTYNE COMPUTER SERVICE
BC WIRE ROPE & RIGGING
BAR TECH TELECOM, INC.
BATTERY SPECIAL TIES
BELL PIPE & SUPPLY
BIO-GRO DIVISION
BLACK & VEATCH
CCI TECHNOLOGIES
CEM CORPORATION
CH2M HILL
CPI -THE ALTERNATIVE
CRG MARINE LAB
CS COMPANY
CAL TROL, INC.
CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE
CALIF SEA GRANT COLLEGE SYS
CAMAUCORP.
CAMAUCORP.
CAMP DRESSER & MC KEE INC
CANUS CORPORATION
CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT.
CLA-VAL COMPANY
CLOSSON & CLOSSON
COLICH & SONS
AMOUNT
$37.50
$320.00
$7.82
$26.42
$4.06
$99.00
$43.00
$19.95
$1,232.52
$18,666.45
$9,285.78
$9,320.00
$155.00
$935.00
$425.00
$790.00
$2,058.02
$6,818.24
$5,907.32
$393.99
$1,538.13
$15.73
$550.00
$995.35
$650.00
$2,540.55
$299.29
$39,344.88
$557.61
$1,801.00
$562.50
$20,198.68
$284.46
$4,625.00
$428.99
$290.93
$325.36
$24.00
$1,300.00
$2,175.00
$24,692.00
$2,425.00
$3,220.00
$128.96
$330.00
$61,262.00
PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
OFFICE PANEL
PUBLICATIONS ,
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE
0
SERVICES
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
D.O.T. TRAINING PROGRAM
PUBLICATIONS
PUBLICATIONS
SPECIAL TY GASSES
O&M AGREEMENT OXYGEN. SYST. M.0.8-9-89
VALVE PARTS
ON-SITE TRAINING
MEMBERSHIP
TRAINING REGISTRATION
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
SERVICE AGREEMENT
EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
NOTICES & ADS
COMPUTER SOFlWARE
PUMP PARTS
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
PLAQUES
CONSULTING SERVICES
ROPE
TELEPHONE INSTALLATION
BATTERIES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95
ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-46
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
LAB SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
LAB SUPPLIES
OCEAN MONITORING
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
HARDWARE
SERVICE AGREEMENT
PUBLICATIONS
SERVICE AGREEMENT
SERVICE AGREEMENT
ENGINEERING SERVICES
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
OFFICE FURNITURE
VALVE REPAIR
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159724
159725
159726
159727
159728
159729
159730
159731
159732
159733
159734
159735
159736
159737
159738
159739
159740
159741
159742
159743
159744
159745
159746
159747
159748
159749
159750
159751
159752
159753
159754
159755
159756
159757
159758
159759
159760
159761
159762
159763
159764
159765
159766
159767
159768
159769
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97
VENDOR
JOHN COLLINS
JAMES E. COLSTON
COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP
COMMUNITY ACTION\EAP
COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA
CONFIDENTIAL MGMT SERVICES
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST
COPELCO CAPITAL
CORE LABORATORIES, INC.
COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY
COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER
CRANE PRO SERVICES
CA & THE WORLD OCEAN 97
DAILY PILOT
DAY-TIMERS, INC.
DELL MARKETING L. P.
DEL MAR ANALYTICAL
DETECTOR ELECTRONICS
DIAMOND H RECOGNITION
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP.
DUNN EDWARDS CORP.
ENS RESOURCES INC
EDINGER MEDICAL GROUP INC
J.D. EDWARDS
LINDA EISMAN
ELECTRA-BOND, INC.
EMERGENCY MGMT NElWORK
ENCHANTER, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.
FIBERTRON
FILTER SUPPLY CO.
BAILEY FISCHER & PORTER
FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO.
FLO-SYSTEMS INC.
FOLSOM LAKE FORD
FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA
FRANKLIN QUEST CO.
FRAZEE PAINT & WALLCOVERING
FRY'S ELECTRONICS
GST, INC.
GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY
GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
GETINGE-CASTLE
GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC.
AMOUNT
$76.18
$139.51
$8,328.70
$950.00
$3,943.19
$6,045.20
$8,296.75
$1,432.00
$800.00
$118.39
$209.00
$1,985.00
$110.00
$38.50
$31.40
$63,506.81
$3,076.00
$76.45
$169.67
$20,943.60
$28.19
$1,169.04
$609.00
$27,580.75
$443.50
$2,537.51
$4,115.00
$2,100.00
$1,030.35
$144.21
$2,562.94
$797.07
$1,878.06
$1,278.59
$9,577.30
$31,348.30
$1,730.80
$105.40
$217.17
$200.42
$204.66
$1,995.62
$1,540.83
$5,527.86
$502.02
$26,579.26
PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
EXPENSE REIMB.
EXPENSE REIMB.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISTRICT EAP -JUNE 97
PUMP PARTS
INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES
ELECTRIC PARTS
COLOR COPIER LEASE
LAB SUPPLIES
TRUCK PARTS
TECHNICAL TRAINING
CRANE PARTS
PUBLICATION
NOTICES & ADS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
COMPUTERS
BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS
LAMP
SERVICE AWARDS
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
PAINT SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WORKERS COMP
SOFlWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7-24-96
EXPENSE REIMB.
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95
LAB SERVICES
AIRFREIGHT
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
FILTERS
CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
PUMP PARTS
TRUCKS
OIL ABSORBANT
PHOTO SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PAINT
ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CHEMICALS
TELEPHONE SERVICES
VALVE
PUMP PARTS
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159770
159771
159772
159773
159774
159775
159776
159777
159778
159779
159780
159781
159782
159783
159784
159785
159786
159787
159788
159789
159790
159791
159792
159793
159794
159795
159796
159797
159798
159799
159800
159801
159802
159803
159804
159805
159806
159807
159808
159809
159810
159811
159812
159813
159814
159815
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97
VENDOR
GLOBAL EQUIPMENT
WW GRAINGER PARTS OPER
GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS
GRASBY S.T.I.
GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING
DGA CONSULTANTS
HACH COMPANY
KEVIN HADDEN
HATCH & KIRK, INC.
PL HAWN CO, INC.
JAMES D. HERBERG
HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE
HOLMES & NARVER, INC.
HOME DEPOT
HYATT DIE CASTING
IBM
IPCOSAFETY
IMAGING PLUS
ITA, INC-TOSHIBA ACCESSORIES
INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS
INTERSTATE BATIERY SYSTEMS
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
ISCO, INC.
J2 PRINTING SERVICES
JH RECOGNITION CO.
JAMISON ENGINEERING
GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY
JAY'S CATERING
JOBS AVAILABLE
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES
LAB SYSTEMS
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC.
LANTRONIX
LASHER AUTO CENTER
LAW/CRANDAL, INC.
LEE & RO CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, INC.
LEXIS-NEXIS
K.P. LINDSTROM, INC.
LOS ANGELES TIMES
MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC.
MPS
MSA
MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP.
MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS, INC.
LESLIE MARELL, ATTORNEY/LAW
AMOUNT
$2,064.36
$156.80
$668.59
$1,518.67
$735.15
$4,355.00
$1,718.52
$301.78
$5,426.70
$1,157.60
$184.25
$81.89
$8,215.38
$150.60
$519.00
$324.00
$3,826.42
$1,593.13
$527.95
$358.26
$2,427.92
$48.82
$232.74
$1,328.56
$356.48
$6,920.00
$1,415.84
$916.64
$170.00
$858.51
$1,918.60
$5,100.00
$118.17
$2,656.00
$13,299.76
$270.00
$4,478.32
$264.50
$10,894.57
$176.80
$6,000.00
$11.86
$1,594.13
$529.48
$1,397.23
$300.00
PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
WORKBENCH
FAN
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
ENGINE PARTS
PRINTING
SURVEYING SERVICES M:0.6-8-94
LAB SUPPLIES
EXPENSE REIMB.
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
EXPENSE REIMB.
TRUCK PARTS
ENGINEERING SERVICES
SMALL HARDWARE
NON COMPLIANCE USER REFUND
SERVICE AGREEMENT
SAFETY SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BATIERY PACKS
CONNECTORS
BATIERIES
WATER USE
INSTRUMENT
PRINTING
SERVICE AWARD PINS
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE
NOTICES & ADS
MACHINE SUPPLIES
TOOLS
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
LAB SUPPLIES
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
TRUCK
SOIL TESTING 7-13-94
ENGINEERING SERVICES
SUBSCRIPTION
ENVIR. CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90
SUBSCRIPTION
OCEAN MONITORING
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
SENSOR
WELDING SUPPLIES
MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
ON-SITE TRAINING
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159816
159817
159818
159819
159820
159821
159822
159823
159824
159825
159826
159827
159828
159829
159830
159831
159832
159833
159834
159835
159836
159837
159838
159839
159840
159841
159842
159843
159844
159845
159846
159847
159848
159849
159850
159851
159852
159853
159854
159855
159856
159857
159858
159859
159860
159861
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 05/25/97
VENDOR
MARVAC ELECTRONICS
DONALD F. MCINTYRE
MCJUNKIN CORP
MCMASTER -CARR SUPPLY CO
MEDLIN CONTROLS CO.
MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP
MIDWAY MFG. & MACHINING
MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES
MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP
MONITOR LABS, INC.
MONTGOMERY WATSON
MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC.
MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOC
NABISCO
NATIONAL ENVIRO. INFO. SERV.
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
NAT WEST MARKETS
NEAL SUPPLY CO.
NElWORK CATALYST, INC
NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTERS, INC.
NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY
NORTHWEST NATIONAL LIFE
OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES
OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION
OFFICE PAVILIONS/INTERIOR RESOURCES
ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY
ORANGE VALVE & FITIING CO.
OXYGEN SERVICE
COUNTY OF ORANGE
ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY
PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC.
PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC.
PACIFIC BELL
PAGENET
PARKER SUPPLY CO
PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC.
KIMC.PATION
PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION
CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY
PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC.
PINNACLE MICRO
POLYPURE, INC.
POSTMASTER
POWER DESIGN
AMOUNT
$11.85
$532.23
$512.08
$3,190.76
$940.48
$596.00
$6,688.76
$117.27
$603.40
$1,591.10
$13,000.00
$2,880.17
$213.00
$210.00
$61.00
$4,143.04
$985.00
$70,445.97
$661.05
$43,567.16
$2,597.00
$19,829.72
$18,710.71
$1,025.13
$2,490.60
$859.46
$1,032.22
$4,261.88
$1,844.93
$4,740.00
$41,705.40
$403.50
$3,452.44
$5.95
$1,310.06
$657.03
$1,239.14
$1,151.71
$1,208.00
$143.47
$2,217.53
$171,431.94
$1,032.05
$44,443.70
$172.00
$4,849.35
PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
PHONE & EXPENSE REIMB.
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
TOOLS
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
SAFETY SUPPLIES
MECHANICAL REPAIRS
SAFETY SUPPLIES
OFFICE TRAILER LEASE
INSTRUMENT PARTS
AIR TOXICS PROJECT M.0.12-12-90
PUMP PARTS
MEMBERSHIP
PERMIT FEE REFUND
PUBLICATION
SAFETY FILM RENTALS
TRAINING REGISTRATION
COP INTEREST DRAW FEES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
SOFTWARE TRAINING CLASSES
LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL
DISTRICT LTD & STD -JUNE 97
SAFETY GLASSES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS
CHEMICALS
FITIINGS
SPECIAL TY GASES
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
GAP WATER USE M.0.6-9-93
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
INSTRUMENT PARTS
MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE SERVICES
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
FLOW INDICATOR
TIRES
EXPENSE REIMB.
LAB SUPPLIES
REIMB. PETTY CASH
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 3-29-95
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
PO BOX RENTAL
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
< .l ..
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159862
159863
159864
159865
159866
159867
159868
159869
159870
159871
159872
159873
159874
159875
159876
159877
159878
159879
159880
159881
159882
159883
159884
159885
159886
159887
159888
159889
159890
159891
159892
159893
159894
159895
159896
159897
159898
159899
159900
159901
159902
159903
159904
159905
159906
159907
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97
VENDOR
POWER MAINTENANCE INTER, INC
MIKE PRLICH & SONS
PRYOR RESOURCES, INC.
PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC
PUTZMEISTER, INC.
R & R INSTRUMENTS
RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO.
RANCHO AUTO WASH
RAND MATERIALS HANDLING
REAL TIME
BOLT DELIVERY
RELIABLE POWER METERS
REMEDY TEMP
RUSH ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
SFIC/NAT ASSOC METAL FINISH
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
SKCWEST
SANCON ENGINEERING, INC.
SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN
SCHWING AMERICA, INC.
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INrL
STEVEN ANDREWS ENGINEERING
SCOTT SPECIAL TY GASES, INC.
SEWER EQUIP CO OF FLORIDA
SHAMROCK SUPPLY
SHASTA ELECTRIC
SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO.
JEFFSHUBIK
SHURELUCK SALES
LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD SILBER
SKILL PATH SEMINARS
SOUTH COAST SEA FOODS INC.
SOUTH COAST WATER
SOUTHERN CALIF COASTAL WATER
SO. CAL. GAS. CO.
SO. CALIFORNIA MARINE INST.
SOUTHERN STEEL BREA CENTER
SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER
SPRINT
SUMMIT STEEL
SUPELCO, INC.
TAYLOR-DUNN MFG. COMPANY
TEXAS COMMERCE BANK
THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
TONER SYSTEM INTERNATIONAL
TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE
AMOUNT
$912.00
$249,606.00
$228.00
$184.66
$308.44
$66.10
$4,170.65
$360.00
$91.09
$191.25
$99.00
$100.00
$23,749.41
$6,925.00
$500.00
$18,000.00
$1,710.71
$1,850.00
$160.00
$82.02
$86,021.28
$2,830.00
$1,353.75
$216.74
$258.60
$94,243.40
$1,578.69
$403.70
$5,636.16
$450.00
$199.00
$210.00
$195.00
$300,000.00
$20,445.12
$880.00
$75.00
$2,047.22
$31.20
$1,901.11
$470.81
$157.57
$6,818.41
$867.59
$2,450.57
$218.80
PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
BATTERY REPAIR
CONSTRUCTION 3-35R-1
TRAINING REGISTRATION
MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
PUMP PARTS
ELECTRIC PARTS
TRASH REMOVAL
TRUCK WASH TICKETS
FREIGHT
INTEGRATION & SUPPORT SERVICES
FREIGHT
SOFTWARE UPGRADE
TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PUBLICATION
TIN-TDS STUDY
SAFETY SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING SERVICES
TRAINING REGISTRATION
PUMP PARTS
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-8-94
ENGINEERING SERVICES
SPECIAL TY GASES
HOSE
TOOLS
CONSTRUCTION J-31-2 RETENTION RELEASE
TRUCK PARTS
EXPENSE REIMB.
TOOLS/HARDWARE
LEGAL SERVICES
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
PERMIT FEE REFUND
LAB SUPPLIES
MEMBERSHIP
NATURAL GAS
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
PERMIT FEE REFUND
DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
METAL
LAB SUPPLIES
ELECTRIC CART PARTS
COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
MECHANICAL PARTS
PRINTER SUPPLIES
LOCKS &KEYS
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159908
159909
159910
159911
159912
159913
159914
159915
159916
159917
159918
159919
159920
159921
159922
159923
159924
159925
159926
159927
159928
159929
159930
159931
159932
159933
159934
159935
159936
159937
159938
159939
159940
159941
159942
159943
159944
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06125/97 POSTING DATE 06125/97
VENDOR
AEROFUND FINANCIAL/TOP HAT
TORNELL & COTTON
TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC.
EDITH TRAN
TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY, INC.
TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC.
JG TUCKER & SON, INC.
TULE RANCH/MAGAN FARMS
ULTRA SCIENTIFIC
UNISOURCE&/OR BUTLER PAPER
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO
UNIVERSITY OF CA. REGENTS
URBAN WATER INSTITUTE
VPPPA
VWR SCIENTIFIC
VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO. INC.
VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL
VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC.
VARKEL CONSTRUCTION INC
VERNE'S PLUMBING
VERTEX BUSINESS INTERIORS
VILLAGE NURSERIES
VISION SERVICE PLAN -(CA)
WASTE MARKETS
WATERS CORPORATION
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
WAYNE ELECTRIC
WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY
WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO.
WESTSIDE BLDG MATERIAL CORP
WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC.
WILLIAM T & LYNN S WHITE &
CHARLES F. WINSOR
WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART
XEROX CORP.
GARY YOUNG
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97
AMOUNT
$231.45
$1,154.00
$130.41
$311.27
$3,973.76
$222.57
$2,034.46
$34,249.19
$113.00
$152.16
$21.48
$94.00
$15.00
$150.00
$400.00
$6,728.16
$613.74
$247.28
$1,254.79
$34,230.30
$1,470.00
$571.51
$187.95
$7,614.60
$63,986.02
$1,067.64
$932.44
$350.19
$25,554.72
$306.12
$1,039.58
$505.91
15,000.00
$806.25
$99,686.72
$9,840.45
$300.00
$2,209,326.08
PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
MEETING EXPENSE
LEGAL SERVICES
TRUCK PARTS
EXPENSE REIMB.
CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94
TRUCK PARTS
INSTRUMENT PARTS
RESIDUALS REMOVAL
LAB SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PARCEL SERVICES
OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE
PUBLICATION
TRAINING REGISTRATION
TRAINING REGISTRATION
LAB SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
CONSTRUCTION J-11-2 RETENTION RELEASE
PLUMBING SERVICES
OFFICE FURNITURE
LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
VISION PLAN PREMIUM -JUNE 97
RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3-27-96
SERVICE AGREEMENT
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
MOTOR
CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
TOOLS
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
CLAIM SETTLEMENT
EXPENSE REIMB.
LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26-95
COPIER LEASES
MOVE LAB EQUIPMENT
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/25/97 POSTING DATE 06/25/97
VENDOR
SUMMARY
#1 OPERFUND
#1 CONST FUND
#20PERFUND
#2 CONST FUND
#30PERFUND
#3 CAP FAC FUND
#3 CONST FUND
#50PERFUND
#5 CAP FAC FUND
#5 CONST FUND
#60PERFUND
#6 CONST FUND
#70PERFUND
#7 CONST FUND
#11 OPER FUND
#11 CAP FAC FUND
#11 CONST FUND
#13 CONST FUND
#14 OPER FUND
#14 CONST FUND
#5&6 OPER FUND
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND
#6&7 OPER FUND
#7&14 OPER FUND
JTOPERFUND
CORF
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
$3,294.88
$6,523.30
$13,195.09
$18,492.06
$19,827.38
$254,138.00
$19,985.52
$2,127.65
$153.60
$5,973.82
$1,320.95
$4,874.86
$3,295.82
$6,910.75
$2,004.98
$69,023.90
$6,037.22
$239.52
$461.00
$1,408.92
$17.16
$456.40
$216.49
$828.58
$776,271. 71
$446,441.28
$27,919.24
$517,886.00
$2,209,326.08
PROCESSING DATE 06/21/97 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
159964
159965
159966
159967
159968
159969
159970
159971
159972
159973
159974
159975
159976
159977
159978
159979
159980
159981
159982
159983
159984
159985
159986
159987
159988
159989
159990
159991
159992
159993
159994
159995
159996
159997
159998
159999
160000
160001
160002
160003
160004
160005
160006
160007
160008
160009
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97
VENDOR
ABM BUSINESS MACHINES, INC.
AMA/PADGETT-THOMPSON
ARMA INTERNATIONAL
ASTD (AM SOC FOR TRNG & DVLPn
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
AIR DUCT CLEANING
AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
ALADDIN HOUSE
AMERICAN AIRLINES
AMERICAN CRANE INSTITUTE
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC
AMERICAN RED CROSS
AMERICAN SIGMA
AMSA
BLAKE P. ANDERSON
A-PLUS SYSTEMS
ARENS INDUSTRIES, INC.
ARGO ELECTRIC SUPPLY
ARMOR-VAC
ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV.
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING
BSCI (BALLANTYNE COMPUT SRV)
BANANA BLUEPRINT
BAR TECH TELECOM, INC.
BARCO PRODUCTS CO
BARNEBY-SUTCLIFFE CORP.
LAYNE BAROLDI
BELL PIPE & SUPPLY CO
ELOISE BENSON
ANGIE BERDANIS
810-GRO DIVISION
BLACK & VEATCH
BLACK BOX CORP
BLOOMBERG L.P.
BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE
BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP.
BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV.
BUDGET JANITORIAL
BURLINGTON SAFETY LAB INC.
CRG MARINE LAB
CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC.
CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE
CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES
AMOUNT
$323.52
$695.00
$140.00
$180.00
$561 ,093.90
$6,256.00
$56,026.03
$9.44
$162.45
$3,438.48
$2,975.00
$552.24
$2,900.00
$99.00
$5,808.40
$3,757.61
$675.00
$129.37
$8,079.63
$2,461.53
$102.52
$450.00
$105.00
$858.54
$440.00
$3,094.41
$6,171.87
$798.37
$263.22
$106.69
$3,011.62
$1,500.00
$245.00
$38,721.11
$430.27
$475.68
$4,994.21
$193.95
$4,531.93
$327.25
$3,085.00
$207.00
$500.00
$101.29
$997.56
$666.00
PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
TOOLS
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
MEMBERSHIP
MEMBERSHIPS
CONSTRUCTION J-34-1, P2-35-5
AIR DUCT CLEANING SERVICES
O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN. SYST. M.0.8-9-89
AIRFREIGHT
WINDOW BLINDS
TRAVEL SERVICES
ON -SITE TRAINING
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
TRAINING REGISTRATION
PUBLICATION
SAFETY VIDEO'S & MANUELS
MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
TRAINING REGISTRATION
EXPENSE REIMB.
NOTICES & ADS
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
ELECTRIC PARTS
VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
WASTE OIL REMOVAL
PAYROLL SERVICES
CONSUL TING SERVICES
PRINTING M.0.11-07-94
TELEPHONE INSTALLATION
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
FILTER MEDIA
EXPENSE REIMB.
VALVE PARTS
PERMIT FEE
EXPENSE REIMB.
RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95
ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-46
TOOLS
FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.4-14-93
TRUCK REPAIRS
ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18
I INSTRUMENT
JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94
TESTING
OCEAN MONITORING
LAB SUPPLIES
SERVICE AGREEMENT
MOVING SERVICES
< '/
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
160010
160011
160012
160013
160014
160015
160016
160017
160018
160019
160020
160021
160022
160023
160024
160025
160026
160027
160028
160029
160030
160031
160032
160033
160034
160035
160036
160037
160038
160039
160040
160041
160042
160043
160044
160045
160046
160047
160048
160049
160050
160051
160052
160053
160054
160055
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97
VENDOR
CALLAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
CALOL YMPIC GLOVE & SAFETY
CAMP DRESSER & MC KEE INC
CANUS CORPORATION
CAROLLO ENGINEERS
RICHARD CASTILLON
CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT.
CHAPMAN COUNSELING
CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT
COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION
COUCH & SONS
COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP
COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA
COMPUCOM SYSTEMS
COMPUCOM
COMPUTERS AMERICA
COMPUSERVE
JAMES CONG
CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV.
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST
CONSUMER PIPE
CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC.
CDS/NEDCO
COOPER CAMERON CORP.
CORPORATE EXPRESS
COUNCIL ON EDUCATION
COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
CHARLES P. CROWLEY, CO.
CUTLER HAMMER
JAN DEBAY
DELL MARKETING L. P.
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF.
DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES
DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION
ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOC.
DUNKEL BROS MACH MOVING
DUNN EDWARDS CORP.
ELECTRIC MACHINERY
ELECTRA-BONO, INC.
ENCHANTER, INC.
MARK ESQUER
DANNY EVANGELISTA
FMC CORPORATION
FST SAND AND GRAVEL, INC.
FAMILY HEALTH PLAN
FIBERTRON
AMOUNT
$7,300.00
$1,137.65
$370,707.00
$4,189.86
$72,525.47
$1,201.28
$28,092.44
$2,196.00
$1,980.00
$1,615.94
$37,727.97
$8,328.70
$10,310.60
$27,803.48
$216.61
$1,576.41
$1, 171.35
$960.38
$78.18
$5,185.03
$2,419.70
$3,195.94
$61.64
$90,661.76
$5,784.45
$295.00
$2,232.15
$901.62
$300.11
$63.68
$27,436.91
$37,120.71
$426.20
$4,640.00
$1, 136,091.00
$600.00
$109.65
$1,787.57
$969.75
$5,600.00
$586.55
$284.17
$293,876.44
$240.86
$34,394.08
$2,387.90
PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
INVESTMENT ADVICE SERVICES
SAFETY SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING SERVICES
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5-24-95
EXPENSE REIMB.
OFFICE FURNITURE
ON-SITE TRAINING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SOFlWARE
CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PUMP PARTS
COMPUTER PARTS
COMPUTER PARTS
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
COMPUTER SERVICES
EXPENSE REIMB.
TRUCK PARTS
ELECTRIC PARTS
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
ELECTRIC PARTS
ENGINE PARTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
ELECTRIC PARTS
INSTRUMENT PARTS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
DIRECTORS EXPENSE REIMB.
COMPUTERS
DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN
SERVICE CHARGE
INSPECTION SERVICES
PROPERTY INSURANCE MO 5-13-92, 6-10-92
MOVING SERVICES
PAINT SUPPLIES
ELECTRIC PARTS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
OCEAN MONITORING M.O. 5-24-95
EXPENSE REIMB.
EXPENSE REIMB.
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9-14-94
ROAD BASE MATERIALS
MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM
FIBER OPTIC CABLE
·c:.. , .,.
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
160056 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $547.80 FILTERS
160057 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE $360.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
160058 BAILEY FISCHER & PORTER CO. $756.34 ROLL CHARTS
160059 FISHER ROSEMOUNT $1,155.98 ELECTRIC PARTS
160060 FLAT & VERTICAL, INC. $703.00 CONCRETE CUTIING
160061 FLO-SYSTEMS INC. $1,279.00 PUMP PARTS
160062 FLOV\IERS BY CINA $91.59 FLOWERS (DECEASED EMPLOYEE)
160063 FORMA SYSTEMS $9,600.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
160064 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $2,986.75 WATER USE
160065 THE FOXBORO CO. $219.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
160066 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $111.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES
160067 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $2,102.37 ELECTRONIC & COMPUTER SUPPLIES
160068 GST, INC. $2,643.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES
160069 GARRATI-CALLAHAN COMPANY $6,133.67 CHEMICALS
160070 TOM GAWORSKI $215.15 EXPENSE REIMB.
160071 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,172.18 TELEPHONE SERVICES
160072 GEORGETOWN PUBLISHING $97.00 PUBLICATION
160073 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $54.00 LAB SUPPLIES
160074 VWJ GRAINGER, INC. $1,265.08 COMPRESSOR PARTS
160075 GRASBY S.T.I. $2,697.62 ENGINE PARTS
160076 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $229.68 PRINTING
15oon DGA CONSULTANTS $7,600.03 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94
160078 HACH COMPANY $1,104.34 LAB SUPPLIES
160079 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $914.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
160080 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,451.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
160081 PL HAWN CO, INC. $27.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
160082 HELLO DIRECT, INC. $219.93 TELEPHONE HEADSET
160083 HERB'S BLACK FOREST BAKERY $76.40 CATERING SERVICES
160084 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
160085 HEWLETT PACKARD CO $336.41 TOOLS
160086 HUNSAKER & ASSOC IRVINE, INC $4,206.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
160087 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,567.09 WATER USE
160088 IDEXX $659.97 LAB SUPPLIES
160089 IPCOSAFETY $19,942.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES
160090 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $78.66 CONNECTORS
160091 INGERSOLL-RAND EQUIP CORP $12,056.15 COMPRESSOR
160092 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $223.95 TRUCK PARTS
160093 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $2.90 WATER USE
160094 JAMISON ENGINEERING, INC. $27,080.27 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
160095 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $452.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
160096 JAY'S CATERING $253.00 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE
160097 JENSEN TOOLS INC $450.35 VACUUM
160098 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $933.44 ELECTRIC PARTS
160099 JOINT INSTRUMENTATION COMMITIEE $25.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
160100 KAISER PERMANENTE $24,027.23 MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM
160101 KEENAN SUPPLY $15.21 WELDING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
160102
160103
160104
160105
160106
160107
160108
160109
160110
160111
160112
160113
160114
160115
160116
160117
160118
160119
160120
160121
160122
160123
160124
160125
160126
160127
160128
160129
160130
160131
160132
160133
160134
160135
160136
160137
160138
160139
160140
160141
160142
160143
160144
160145
160146
160147
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97
VENDOR
KELAR CORPORATION
KELLY WRIGHT HARDWOODS
KEMIRON PACIFIC, INC.
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES
KOA, INC.
VLADIMIR KOGAN
LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO.
LAW/CRANDAL, INC.
JOHN M LEAVELL P E
LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
LEXIS-NEXIS
LIEBERT CASSIDY & FRIERSON
MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC.
MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS, INC.
MARDEN SUSCO INC.
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
MARVAC ELECTRONICS
MCJUNKIN CORP
MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
MEASUREMENT VARIABLES, INC.
MEDLIN CONTROLS CO.
METRA HEALTH
MISSlON INDUSTRIES
MONITOR LABS
MONTGOMERY WATSON
MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC.
NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES
NEAL SUPPLY CO.
NElWORK CATALYST, INC
NEW HERMES INC
NEWARK ELECTRONICS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE
NWLAND/OR
01 CORPORATION
OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION
OPTIO SOFTWARE INC
ORANGE COAST PETROLEUM EQUIP
THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM
ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE
ORANGE VALVE & FITTING CO.
ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
OXYGEN SERVICE
AMOUNT
$6,320.00
$2,362.62
$140,455.07
$53.90
$1,659.79
$510.31
$1,300.70
$2,056.36
$5,385.70
$5,015.00
$24,110.08
$277.50
$15,000.00
$35,280.00
$1,314.55
$112.49
$1,062, 154.00
$446,224.86
$124,290.00
$152.54
$667.26
$182.88
$269.86
$1,084.28
$136,324.72
$3,737.48
$1,591.10
$29,250.00
$788.38
$25,790.00
$3,079.93
$2,733.36
$81.20
$75.26
$51.35
$9,690.00
$9,760.48
$362.52
$1,197.90
$15,270.00
$307.09
$25.00
$4,892.10
$1,049.55
$2,000.00
$263.68
PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
ON-SITE TRAINING
PLYWOOD
FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95
MACHINE PARTS
TOOLS
PERMIT FEE REFUND
EXPENSE REIMB.
CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE
SOIL TESTING 7-13-94
ON-SITE TRAINING
ENGINEERING SERVICES
SUBSCRIPTION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
VALVE PARTS
CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2
CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2
CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
TOOLS
FILTERS
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUM
UNIFORM RENTALS
INSTRUMENT
AIR TOXICS PROJECT MO 12-12-90
PUMP PARTS
VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
PLASTIC FOR ENGRAVING MACHINE
INSTRUMENT PARTS
WATER USE
LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
LAB SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SOFTWARE
FUEL NOZZLE
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
FITTINGS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SPECIAL TY GASES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
160148
160149
160150
160151
160152
160153
160154
160155
160156
160157
160158
160159
160160
160161
160162
160163
160164
160165
160166
160167
160168
160169
160170
160171
160172
160173
160174
160175
160176
160177
160178
160179
160180
160181
160182
160183
160184
160185
160186
160187
160188
160189
160190
160191
160192
160193
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97
VENDOR
COUNTY OF ORANGE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
PSOC (POOL SUPPLY OF QC)
PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY
PACIFIC PARTS & CONTROLS, INC.
PACIFIC BELL
PAN ENERGY TRADING & MARKET
PARTS UNLIMITED
PENN WELL PUBLISHING CO
PERMASEAL
CTY SAN. DIST. OF ORANGE CTY
PIMA GRO SYSTEMS, INC.
POL YPURE, INC.
POWER MAINTENANCE INTER. INC
PUTZMEISTER, INC.
QMC
RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS
R & R INSTRUMENTS
THE REGISTER
MARCY ROTHENBERG
SCAP
SETACPRESS
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
RONALD E SALEM PSY D
SAVANT AUDIO VISUAL
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INrL
SCIENTIFIC REFRIGERATION
SHAMROCK SUPPLY
SHURELUCK SALES
SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC.
SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY
SOUTH COAST WATER
SO CALIF EDISON CO
SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SER
SO. CALIF. WATER CO.
SUMMIT STEEL
SUNSET FORD
SUPELCO, INC.
SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC.
SYMCAS, INC.
TVS CONSULTING
TAYLOR-DUNN MFG. COMPANY
TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS
TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS
A TINT OF CLASS
TONY'S LOCK & SAFE SERVICE
AMOUNT
$3,360.00
$5,120.11
$135.32
$1,121.38
$6,027.63
$21.73
$115,794.90
$280.54
$938.76
$7,873.22
$1,788.99
$83,624.80
$23,245.90
$1,433.00
sn9.34
$295.79
$53,1n.33
$73.89
$499.80
$787.50
$24,000.00
$53.00
$17,622.20
$125.00
$1,509.63
$9,384.84
$2,016.25
$2,427.79
$1,654.41
$255.00
$84.76
$350.00
$56,541.20
$2,050.52
$113.24
$371.49
$383.27
$826.71
$791,522.10
$285.00
$200.00
$230.80
$882.75
$36.78
$3,188.25
$249.88
PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
PERMITS
REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
OPERATING SUPPLIES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
INSTRUMENT PARTS
TELEPHONE SERVICES
NATURAL GAS
TRUCK PARTS
PUBLICATIONS
LUBE OIL
REIMB. PETTY CASH
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 3-29-95
CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
BATTERY REPAIR
PUMP PARTS
HOSES
ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS
ELECTRIC PARTS
NOTICES & ADS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEMBERSHIP
PUBLICATION
BENCHMARKING STUDY CONSULTANT
ON-SITE SEMINAR
PUBLICATIONS
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-8-94
CONTROLLER UPGRADE
TOOLS
TOOLS/HARDWARE
CERAMIC PROBE
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
POWER
CONDENSER HEAD
WATER USE
METAL
TRUCK PARTS
LAB SUPPLIES
CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3, P1-38-5, P2-46, P2-55
CONSUL TING SERVICES
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
ELECTRIC CART PARTS
INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
CABLE SERVICES
WINDOW TINTING
LOCKS & KEYS
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
WARRANT NO.
160194
160195
160196
160197
160198
160199
160200
160201
160202
160203
160204
160205
160206
160207
160208
160209
160210
160211
160212
160213
160214
160215
160216
160217
160218
160219
160220
160221
160222
160223
160224
160225
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97
VENDOR AMOUNT
TORNELL & COTTON $3,297.50
EDWARD M. TORRES $250.00
TOSHIBA ACCESSORIES I $264.00
TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $762.30
TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC. $727.31
TRANSCAT $4,617.14
TRI-STATE SEMINAR ON-THE-RIVER $40.00
TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY, INC. $7,750.00
TRUCK & AUTO SUPPLY, INC. $134.30
TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $66.34
TRUESDAIL LABS $312.00
JG TUCKER & SON, INC. $3,331.46
TULE RANCH I MAGAN FARMS $34,723.80
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $344.38
VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,827.16
VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $31.31
VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $387.09
VERTEX SYSTEMS $2,618.00
WACKENHUT CORP. $8,968.15
WASTE MARKETS $40,331.84
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY $1,859.30
WEFTEC'97 $1,470.00
WESTERN FEDERAL INC $500.00
WESTERN MEDICAL CENTER $1,253.02
WESTERN PACIFIC ALLIANCE CO. $183.00
WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $437.71
JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. $170.41
JUDITH A. WILSON $406.40
WOMEN'S ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL $500.00
XEROX CORP. $1,871.94
GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $865.36
ZYMARK CORP. $436.00
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 $6,589, 165.60
PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
DESCRIPTION
LEGAL SERVICES
TRAVEL ADVANCE
LAPTOP COMPUTER BATTERY
INSTRUMENT PARTS
TRUCK PARTS
CALIBRATOR
SEMINAR REGISTRATION
CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94
TRUCK PARTS
TRUCK PARTS
LAB SERVICES
INSTRUMENT PARTS
RESIDUALS REMOVAL
PARCEL SERVICES
LAB SUPPLIES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FIBER OPTICS
COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS
RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3-27-96
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
DEGREASER
ROCONCILIATION REFUND
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
PUBLICATION
EXPENSE REIMB.
BEACH CLEAN-UP SPONSERSHIP
COPIER LEASES
LAB SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 -JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/09/97 POSTING DATE 07/09/97
SUMMARY
#1 OPERFUND
#20PERFUND
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#30PERFUND
#3 CAP FAC FUND
#50PERFUND
#5 CAP FAC FUND
#60PERFUND
#70PERFUND
#7 CAP FAC FUND
#11 OPER FUND
#11 CAP FAC FUND
#3&11 OPER FUND
#5&6 OPER FUND
#5&6 CAP FAC FUND
#6&7 OPER FUND
#7&14 OPER FUND
JTOPERFUND
CORF
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
$357.40
$11, 194.40
$4,206.00
$9,281.81
$6,705.70
$2,542.81
$2,248.00
$148.20
$2,592.51
$11,851.54
$1,416.65
$112,289.22
$25,790.00
$5,344.90
$43.02
$1,901.67
$4,381.99
$2,377,316.20
$3,603,262.09
$7,203.44
$399,088.05
$6,589, 165.60
PROCESSING DATE 07/08/97 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
MEETING DATE
OMTS:
PDC:
FAHR:
EXEC:
STEER:
JT.BDS: 8127 /97
7
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
AGENDA
ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
CONTACT FOR INFORMATION
(Originator)
3720, Chuck Winsor, 5052
Division No., Name, and Extension
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE (District No. 7) : The Engineering Department
requests approval of an agreement that provides reimbursement by District No. 7 to the County of Orange,
Public Facilities and Resources Department, for the cost of adjusting approximately 12 existing District No. 7
manholes within several County of Orange streets in unincorporated areas in District 7 in conjunction with the
County's "Resurfacing Program 1996-97".
Recommended Action(s):
1. Approve a reimbursement agreement with the County of Orange authorizing District No. 7 to deposit the sum
of $2,340.00 with the County of Orange as the estimated cost for adjustment of approximately twelve District
No. 7 manholes in several County of Orange streets.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Date Notice of Exemption Filed:
Negative Declaration Approved on N/A
. .
CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR-YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET
INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
EXPENDITURES (Total Budget plus
Transfers)
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $100,000 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000
SOURCE: DISTRICT No. 7 CIP
Line Items: Item 13, Miscellaneous Projects
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL
INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET
First Year in Budget: N/A $100,000.00 NIA N/A $100,000.00
Master Plan Estimate:
Year of First Costs:
THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED
INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT
AU/'\ll•IT • ----~IC'r"\ AIT A••-•• .. •-
N/A N/A $2,340.00 $2,340.00
I WILL PROJECT R:EQUIR:E ADDITIONAL flER:SONNEL? l~O R:EQUIR:ES 80AR:D POLICY ACTION? l~O
Revised 05/14/97 Page 1 of2
H:\WP. OT A \AGENDA \AITS-97\AUGUSnENG.02.DOC
~2-/-9-1-
Signature Date
Assistant General Manager (Or Designee)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List):
1.
ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List)
1.
County Sanitation District No. 7 (CSD 7) owns many local and trunk sewers in the unincorporated portion of Orange
County near the City of Tustin. Most of those sewers are in public streets which are controlled by the County of
Orange. This year, the County of Orange Public Facilities & Resources Department is providing street
improvements on some of these streets by performing asphalt overlays as part of the County's "Resurfacing
Program 1996-97". The street overlay program will initially cover up some of the District No. 7 manholes which will
make it necessary to "adjust" (or raise) the elevation of the existing manholes to match the final elevation of the
newly paved streets. The County is proposing to charge CSD 7 $195.00 for each manhole that is adjusted under
this contract. It is customary for the District's to pay these cost when the Districts' facilities are located in the public
right of way under an easement or by an encroachment permit. For twelve manholes, the total is $2,340.00. The
funds for this project will be allocated from the miscellaneous project budget for District No. 7.
Staff recommends approval of the reimbursement agreement with the County of Orange, which provides for District
No. 7 to deposit the sum of $2,340.00 with the County of Orange.
CFW:jmf .
H:\WP .OTA \AGENDA \AITS-97\JUL Y\ENG.02
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
Revised 05/14197
H:\WP .OTA \AGENDA \AITS-97\JUL Y\ENG.02
Page 2 of2
DRAFT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962..-2411
MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, JULY 30, 1997 AT 5:30 P.M.
The regular meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, July 30, 1997, at 5:30 p.m.,
at the Districts' Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PRESENT:
John J. Collins, Joint Chair
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair
George Brown, Chair, FAHR
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS
Burnie Dunlap, Chair, PDC
ABSENT:
Bill Steiner, Supervisor
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
OTHERS PRESENT:
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
STAFF PRESENT:
Donald F. Mcintyre, General Manager
Blake P. Anderson, Chief Operations Officer
Judith A. Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer
Edwin E. Hodges, Director of GSA
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
There were no comments by any member of the public.
RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
MOTION: Receive, file and approve draft minutes of the June 25, 1997 Steering Committee meeting
as mailed. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page2
July 30, 1997
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager thanked Judy Wilson for her two years of service to the Districts. At this time,
her position will not be filled. The Administrative side of the house is in good order and with Don's
oversight can be maintained. He will meet with the administrative departments heads on a weekly
basis, as Judy has done.
Action Item: A revised organization chart will be prepared for the next meeting.
Director McGuigan suggested that Michelle Tuchman prepare an announcement on the plans to
eliminate this position. Don indicated that he will be making the announcement at the August
Board meeting.
REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel did not make a ~eport.
DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-10)
The discussion items were taken out of order to accommodate staff schedules, as follows:
1. Consider County of Orange Request for Certification and Indemnification of Districts' User
Charges and compliance with the provisions of Proposition 218 and make recommendation to
Joint Boards.
Discussion: General Counsel Tom Woodruff indicated that there is no longer a need to
present this item to the Joint Boards because the County Auditor has agreed to language
revisions suggested by Counsel. As it turned Ol.lt, 60 of the 63 entities that received this
certification request also refused to sign the form as written.
Action:
The Steering Committee authorized General Counsel to send the revised compliance letter
dated July 31, 1997 to the County Auditor. The Joint Chair will ask that the item be removed
from the Joint Boards agenda tonight.
3. Update on County of Orange 800 MHz Project proposed at Plant 2
Discussion: Ed Hodges, Director of General Services Administration, updated the
Committee on recent activities related to the County's Emergency Response system,
specifically the 800 MHz Communication System which is the backbone of the program. In
April, when the project was first discussed with the Steering Committee, staff was directed
to talk with the Huntington Beach Directors to get their concurrence. At that time, the
Directors indicated they were not interested in participating in the program. However, the
Huntington Beach City Council, on advice from their emergency services staff, voted in
June to go ahead and allow the County to site a facility on our property. However, after
meeting with the homeowners in the area, the specific site at Plant 2 has been changed.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 3
July 30, 1997
When staff was advised of the change, they notified the County that the location is on an
earthquake fault. The County determined that this would not be a problem and submitted a
proposed lease agreement that included a term of 50 years at no cost. During discussions,
Mr. Hodges suggested that if the lease was "no cost", then we would want to be provided
access to the 800 MHz system for free, which would result in a potential savings for the
Districts of about $1.2 million. The other key negotiating point would be to get the Districts
designated as an "essential public service", which we are not considered at this time by the
county communication system. Another requirement would be that at the end of the lease ,
the County would be responsible for removing the facilities at their expense. There is an
indemnity clause included as well.
Mr. Hodges then described the project in more detail and displayed an architectural
rendering of the project. The tower will be 150 feet tall and the footprint (including the
building) will be approximately 20' x 60'.
The Steering Committee authorized staff to proceed with negotiations, and directed staff to
discuss the project with the Directors from Costa Mesa and Newport Beach as well. The
lease agreement will be in a form acceptable to General Counsel. Director McGuigan
suggested that landscaping be considered around the facility.
5. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Station, Job No. P1-51, and proposal from Pickens Fuel
Corp.
Mr. Hodges reviewed the history of the project and the activities to date. In June, General
Counsel advised staff that there could be a problem with owning and operating a
commercial station. A meeting was held with Pickens Fuel Corp. to discuss the possibility
of their taking over the construction and financing responsibility for this station. They
indicated a willingness to consider this opportunity, and submitted a proposal. Mr. Hodges
outlined the deal points of the proposal. A meeting was held with AQMD to discuss the
proposed changes, and they agreed with the concept. Several issues still need to be
resolved, including obtaining the air emission credits associated with the project, and no
guarantee from us on minimum usage.
General Counsel explained the Districts' limited powers for business ventures that are
specified in the Special Districts Act. Director Dunlap questioned selling electricity.
Because this is a byproduct of our processes, there are no restrictions. There are studies
underway at this time to see how the deregulation of the electrical utilities may affect the
Districts.
The Steering Committee had no objections to the continued negotiations with Pickens Fuel
Corp. and AQMD.
2. Proposed Changes to the Delegation of Authority.
Blake Anderson updated the members on the status of the proposed revisions to the
Delegation of Authority resolution. These changes are tentatively scheduled to go to the
PDC and FAHR in October, depending on when the workshop for the PDC Committee
members is held. If approved, the changes would be effective January 1, 1998.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page4
July 30, 1997
4. Update on Investigation and Associated Costs.
Judy Wilson reported on the status of the appeal hearings. All of the Level 2 hearings have
been held. There are still three hearings for Level 1 employees and these should be
completed by the end of August. Only one decision was overturned, due to the lack of
cor:roborating testimony. The costs to date were also reviewed.
The committee questioned the impact of vacant positions in the Collections Facilities
Division on the collections system programs. Staff indicated that at this time there have
been no adverse effects.
6. OCR Project Governance Issues.
Blake Anderson discussed the process used for approving action items from the Joint OCR
Project Cooperative Committee. There are two actions moving forward at this time for
presentation to the Boards in August. Because no additional projects are anticipated that
would require PDC Committee or Boards action until 1999, further discussions on
streamlining the approval process will be deferred until mid-1998.
7. Next Steps for Consolidation.
Judy Wilson indicated that there will be an Executive Committee meeting on September 17
to review the LAFCO application. Cymantha Atkinson will be the lead for this project.
When the consolidation bill becomes law in January, LAFCO will hold public hearings.
Implementation is scheduled for July 1, 1998. Don Mcintyre mentioned that he had lunch
with Dana Smith of LAFCO and she is comfortable with the schedule. Staff is looking at
this as an opportunity to streamline many of the administrative processes. The issue of
rate equalization was discussed. Many of the issues of concern can be discussed after
consolidation is implemented.
8. Review FY 96-97 Year-end Numbers.
Staff reviewed the year-end numbers with the Committee. Year-end spending resulted in
an increase in the cost/mgd, from $511 to $530. Controls may have to be developed to
encourage staff to avoid this end-of-the-year budget spend down. The impact on the
budget of the CMS investigation was discussed.
10. Agenda Items Scheduled for Committee Review in August.
The OMTS and FAHR Committees are not meeting in August.
The items for the August PDC Committee were discussed. Chair Collins suggested that
Dave Ludwin and Chairman Dunlap meet with Supervisor Spitzer's aide before the meeting
to thoroughly review the items on the agenda.
Director McGuigan indicated that she has taken the liberty to change the OMTS scheduled
"dark" month from December to January. There will be a meeting of the OMTS on
December3.
Minutes of the Steering Committee
Page 5
July 30, 1997
Director Dunlap advised the Committee that the members of the PDC Committee
unanimously approved the hiring of Frank Dryden.
It was agreed that Item 9, Discussion on Performance Evaluations of Assistant General
Managers and Department Heads, would be moved to Closed Session.
OTHER.BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY
Blake Anderson updated the members on recent OCIP activities relative to the County's intention to
keep ali of the $30 million settlement with Merrill Lynch, and discussed possible options.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
CLOSED SESSION
The Joint Chair reported to the Directors the need for a closed session, as authorized by
Government Code Section 45956'.9, to discuss personnel evaluations. He reported that the item
could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the
Committee. No other item would be discussed or acted upon.
Upon the unanimous vote of all members present to move the item, the Committee convened in
closed session at 7:05 p.m.
Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in
accordance with California Government Code Section 45957 .2 and are maintained by the Board
Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
A report of the action taken will be publicly reported at the time that the approved action becomes
final.
At 7:25 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 27, 1997 at 5:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:26 p.m .
. dta\admin\GM\STEERING COMMITIEE\97\JUL\July Minutes.doc
DRAFT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P.O. Box8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: {714) 962-2411
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN,
AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday. August 7. 1997 at 630 p.m.
A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on August 7, 1997, at
6:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office. Prior to the meeting, there was a tour of the
Secondary Treatment Facilities Upgrades (P1-36-2) at Plant No. 1.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Present:
Burnie Dunlap, Chair
Tom Carroll
John Collins, Joint Chair
Shirley Dettloff, Vice Chair
Brian Donahue
Eva Miner-Bradford
Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair
Absent
Patsy Marshall
Christina Shea
Todd Spitzer
Bob Zemel
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Staff Present:
Don Mcintyre, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
John Linder, Construction Manager
Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor
Chris Cervellone, Engineering Supervisor
Jim Harris, Principal Engineering Associate
Others Present:
Mary Lee, Carollo Engineers
Tom Dawes, Consultant
Steve Uthoff & Narver
The minutes of the July 3, 1997 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were approved
as drafted.
Minutes of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee
Page2
August 7, 1997
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
After being advised that all Committee members had spoken with Frank Dryden, the consultant who is
putting together the program on Engineering Processes, the Chair asked the Assistant General
Manager of Operations if there was a target date for the orientation and workshop. The Assistant
General Manager advised that the two dates they were looking at were Thursday, September 18th for
the orientation, and Saturday, September 20th for the workshop. Committee members agreed that
two sessions would be beneficial. All Board members would be given the opportunity to attend both
of these sessions.
Some Committee members advised that those dates would not be good. It was decided a telephone
poll would be taken of the Committee to pick a date when the majority of the people can attend.
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR
The Joint Chair had no report.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager passed out copies of a letter from Mark Asturias of the City of Garden Grove.
The letter comments on what a good job consultants and staff are doing with the Rate Advisory and
Planning Advisory Committees.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION
The Assistant General Manager of Administration was not present.
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER -OPERATIONS
The Assistant General Manager of Operations advised that Frank Dryden will issue a report and
summary of issues by the middle of next week. Frank believes that with the constructive comments
and the issues that have come forward, this will be a really powerful and positive opportunity to make
some constructive changes in how the Committee conducts business.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
The Director of Engineering distributed copies of the process flow diagram. Director Donahue had
asked for some informational material whil~ on the tour this evening.
It was also suggested during the tour that in order to have a comparison of our plant to other
treatment plants, a time be set to visit another plant such as L.A. County Sanitation Districts or Irvine
Ranch Water District.
The Director of Engineering reported on his presentation at the City Council of Huntington Beach on
Monday, August 4. After the Board meeting on July 10, Councilman Harman had asked him to report
on the Slater Avenue Pump Station. Dave Ludwin ~;we a brief overview of the project.
Minutes of the Planning. Design
and Construction Committee
Page3
August7. 1997
REPORT OE GENERAL COUNSEL
General Counsel was not present.
MONTHLY REPORT ON CHANGE ORDERS
Information Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Report dated
August 7. 1997.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (1-2)
1. DISCUSSION RE: COLLECTION SYSTEM INFORMATION IN COMPUTERIZED
MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CMMS) DATABASE.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action recommended by staff.
The Engineering Supervisor. Planning. presented a discussion regarding the Computerized
Maintenance Management System (CMMS) data which required corrections by COM during
development of the collection systems model as part of the Strategic Plan. It was explained
that the CMMS data was entered jointly by Districts• staff and RJN. an outside firm. It was
further stated that the original intent of the CMMS was a maintenance management tool used
for scheduling work and locating manholes. It was not intended to provide exact elevations of
manholes -a requirement to do an accurate predictive hydraulic model. The additional work
required of COM was due to 11stretching" the CMMS data for this engineering application. This
turned out to be a cost-effective method of getting the most out of an old database.
2. DISCUSSION RE: SEISMIC RETROFIT OF STRUCTURES AND NONSTRUCTURAL
SYSTEMS.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:. Information Only Item. No action recommended by staff.
The Engineering Manager presented the history of the seismic retrofit program the Districts
has been implementing since 1989. The discussion included the soils investigations. defining
the relationship between the Districts' facilities and local earthquake faults zones. predicting
most likely maximum magnitude earthquake events, developing criteria for the upgrade of
existing structures and minimum standards for new construction. and designs for supporting
existing piping systems and mechanical/electrical equipment.
The presentation also included information related to construction budgets and anticipated
schedules for completion of the facilities upgrade. The original budget of approximately
$60 million included all upgrades to facilities and the work required to stabilize the soils under
structures. The soil stabilization was found to be impractical during the initial study and was
not considered a viable means to increase the resistance of structures to an earthquake and
subsequent liquification of the soil underlying the Huntington Beach facilities. The final cost of
this program is approximately $9 million with final completion anticipated in the fourth quarter
of 1998.
Minutes of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee
Page4
August 7, 1997
ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 3-6)
3. PDC97-38: CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS. J-34-1 AND P2-35-5 WITH ADVANCO
CONSTRUCTORS, INC. FOR OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND PHASE II
SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS: The Construction Manager and Director of
Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing six items of added work.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 2 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 with
Advanco Constructors, Inc. for an addition of $50,415, increasing the total contract amount to
$7, 168,938.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
4. PDC97-39: CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 TO JOB NO. P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE
CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT
NO. 1: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change
Order No. 9 providing four items of additional and deleted work.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 9 to Job No. P1-36-2 with Margate
Construction, Inc. for a credit of $2,479, decreasing the total contract amount to $35,255,318.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve recommended action.
5. PDC97-40: ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT
FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORK (All Districts): The Joint
Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of selection of Black and Veatch for
preliminary engineering and environmental work in support of the Orange County Reclamation
(OCR) Project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve selection of Black and Veatch to provide Preliminary
Engineering and Environmental Work for the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed
$449,500 as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 29, 1997. The
Districts' share is $224, 750, or fifty percent of the total fee of $449,500 in accordance with the
Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project,
dated February 26, 1997.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
6. PDC97-41: ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT
FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating
Committee requests approval of a Task Order with Adler Public Affairs for public information
services in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve selection of Adler Public Affairs to provide public
information services in support of the OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $99, 796, as
approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 22, 1997. The Districts' share
-;
Minutes of the Planning, Design
and Construction Committee
Pages
August 7, 1997
is $49,598, or fifty percent of the total fee of $99, 796, in accordance with the Cooperative
Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated
February 26, 1997.
MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS. OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY
There were none.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
September 4, 1997.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
Submitted by:
/.Gail Cain
;:;ann;ng, Design, and Construction
Committee Secretary
:gc
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\PDC97\AUG\MIN.WPO
1·
MEETING DATE
OMTS:
POC: 8/7/97
FAHR:
EXEC:
STEER:
JT.BOS: 8/27/97
DISTRICT NO.
All
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
AGENDA
ITEM
TRANS MITT AL
CONTACT FOR INFORMATION
(Originator)
Dept. 3790, Tod Haynes, 6304
Division No., Name, and Extension
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NO. J-34-1 AND P2-35-5 WITH ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. FOR
OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND PHASE II SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS: The
Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 2 providing six items
of added work.
Recommended Action(s):
1. Approve Change Order No. 2 to Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5 with Advanco Constructors, Inc. for an addition
of $50,415.00 increasing the total contract amount to $7, 168,938.00.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO
Date Notice of Exemption Filed: EIR approved July 1989
Negative Declaration Approved on
Final EIR Approved on July 1989 and Notice of Determination filed on 219/95
CURRENT BUDGET/COST
INFORMATION
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ 8,750,000.00
SOURCE: CORF
Schedule/line Items: line B(B)d and C(2)a
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:NA
Schedule/line ltem:NA
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
INFORMATION
First Year in Budget:
Master Plan Estimate:
Year of First Costs:
THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST
INFORMATION
CURRENT YEAR
BUDGET AMOUNT
$1,075,000
ORIGINAL BUDGET
TOTAL
$8, 750,000.00
ORIGINAL BID, PO,
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
$7, 122,693.00
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES
If YES, state number: _ Permanent _ limited Term
DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
11/20/96
CURRENT YEAR-
TO-DATE
EXPENDITURES
$785,204
PREVIOUS BUDGET
CHANGES
$0.00
CHANGE ORDERS,
FUNDS PREY.
APPROVED
($4, 170.00)
YEAR-TO-DATE
BUDGET BALANCE
$289,796
BUDGET CHANGE
THISAIT
$0.00
AMOUNT
REQUESTED THIS
AIT
$50,415.00
REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO
REVISED BUDGET
TOTAL
(Total Budget plus
Transfers)
$1,075,000
REVISED TOTAL
PROJECT BUDGET
$8, 750,000.00
AMENDED
PROJECT
AMOUNT
$7,168,938.00
If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
Revised 05/14/97
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\J-34-1\AIT.C02
Page 1 of 2
..C/
Date
7-'B · 'l7
Date
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List):
1. Budget Information Table
2. Change Order Status Report
3. Change Order
ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List)
1. Budget Information Table
2. Chane Order Status Report
3. Signed Change Order
)
Job No. J-34-1, Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, consists of improving the reliability of the standby Ocean Outfall
Pipeline by constructing a new Surge Tower in this line and adding valves to the existing system. Job No. P2-35-5,
Phase II Site and Security Improvements consist of miscellaneous site and landscape improvements at Plant No. 2.
The plans and specifications for J-34-1 were prepared by Carollo Engineers and the plans and specifications for
P2-35-5 were prepared by Brown and Caldwell Engineers. The construction contract was awarded to Advance
Constructors, Inc. in November 1996. This contract is approximately 29% complete. Change Order No. 2 is an
addition in the amount of $50,415.00 to the contract for 6 items of added work. There is no time extension for this
change order. The following is a summary of the contract:
Original Contract Price
Previously· Authorized Changes
This Change(Add){Deduet}
Change Order to Date
Percent Increase
Amended Contract Price
$ 7, 122,693.00
$ (4, 170.00)
$ 50,415.00
$ 46,245.00
0.65%
$ 7, 168,938.00
The following summarizes the Change Order. For additional details on individual items, see the attached Change
Order:
ITEM NO, DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE
1 Repair Outfall No. 2 3,629.00 0 Changed Condition
2 Undisclosed Structures and Pipe 14,750.00 0 Changed Condition
3 Conduit Revisions 6,928.00 0 Design Change
4 Over Excavation at Effluent Trunk 16,081.00 0 Changed Condition
5 Industrial Water System Revisions 2,718.00 0 Omission
6 Modifications at Effluent Sampler Building 6,309.00 0 Design Change
TOTAL -Change Order No. 2 $50,415.00 0
All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the
design phase. Liquidated damages on this contract is $500.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions.
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
A GM-Operations
General Manager
Revised 05114/97
H:\WP .OTA \ENG\ENG\J-34-1 \AIT .C02
Page 2of2
PROJECT/TASK
CONSULTANT
STAFF
CONTRACTOR
TOTAL
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site And Security Improvements
Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5
BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED TOTAL (ADOPTED BY AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURE TO
CORF) DATE REQUEST FUNDS DATE
$ 247,000.00 $ 227,000.00 $ 227,000.00 $ 97,000.00
$ 1,024, 172.00 $ 1,024, 172.00 $ 1,024, 172.00 $ 465,631.00
$ 7,478,828.00 $ 7, 118,523.00 $ 50,415.00 $ 7, 168,938.00 $ 1,499,316.00
$ 8,750,000.00 $ 8,369,695.00 $ 50,415.00 $ 8,420, 110.00 $ 2,061,947.00
H:\wp.dta\eng\eng\J-34-1 \C02budgetbl.xls
ESTIMATED
COMPLETE TO
DATE(%)
42.73%
45.46%
20.91%
24.49%
ITEM
CONTRACT
CO N0.1
CO NO. 2
CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT
Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades and Phase II Site And Security Improvements
Job Nos. J-34-1 and P2-35-5
APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED
TIME TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS)
11/20/96 $ 7t122,693.00 $ 7,122,693.00 730 730
6/25/97 $ (4,170.00) $ 7, 118,523.00 (0.06) 0 730
Proposed $ 50,415.00 $ 7,168,938.00 0.65 0 730
H :\wp.dta\eng\ENG\J-34-1 \C02chngstat.xls
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Page 1of4
Contractor: Advanco Constructors. Inc. CO. No. Two(2)
Job:
Date: August 27. 1997
Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade. Job No. J-34-1 Phase II Site and Security Improvements.
Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access. Job No. SP19950003
Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduet) $ 50.415.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from
the contract price are hereby approved.
Job No. J-34-1
ITEM 1 -REPAIR OUTFALL NO. 2:
This item is for cost associated with investigation and repair Ocean Outfall No. 2 after a leak was
discovered during excavation operations. The work includes excavation, epoxy grout injection, and
backfill. This work was accomplishe.d by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(b) of
the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 3)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
$ 3,629.00
O Calendar Days
ITEM 2 -UNDISCLOSED STRUCTURES AND PIPE CONFLICTING WITH CONSTRUCTION
This item is for revising shoring in Area 1 to allow removal of undisclosed structures and debris
discovered during construction operations. The additional work includes revised pile and lagging,
removal of existing structures, and removal of pipe conflicting with the work. The structures and debris
were not disclosed in the contract documents. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force
account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(b) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order
No. 7)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
ITEM 3 -CONDUIT REVISIONS
$14,750.00
O Calendar Days
This item is for revising the conduit specification to meet new conduit material standards adopted by
the Districts on August 17, 1996. The new standards were adopted after the design for this project
was completed. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the
General Provisions. (Reference Field Change Order No. 10).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
$6,928.00
0 Calendar Days
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Page 2of4 ~
Contractor: Advanco Constructors. Inc. CO. No. TwoC2l
Job:
Date: August 27. 1997
Ocean Outfall Reliabilitv Upgrade. Job No. J-34-1. Phase II Site and Security Improvements.
Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access. Job No. SP19950003
ITEM 4 -OVER EXCAVATION OF 120" EFFLUENT LINE
This item is for providing equipment, labor, and materials to remove unsuitable material below the
proposed 120" Primary/Secondary Effluent line. The unsuitable material was encountered
between Station 1 + 00 and Station 2 + 67 and was not shown in the contract documents. The
unsuitable material was replaced with crushed rock surrounded by geotextile fabric. This work
was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b )2(b) of the General
Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 8)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
Job No. P2-35-5
ITEM 5-INDUSTRIAL WATER SYSTEM REVISIONS
$16,081.00
O Calendar Days
This item is for revising the specification for industrial water pipe and valve boxes to provide color
complying with Orange County Health Department standards for industrial water piping used for
irrigation purposes. The color coding requirement for the pipe was not included in the contract
documents. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b )2(A) of the
General Provisions. (Reference Field Change Order No. 5)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
ITEM 6 -MODIFICATIONS AT EFFLUENT SAMPLER BUILDING
$ 2,718.00
O Calendar Days
This item is for revising grading requirements, increasing the size of the gas meter pit, and providing an
access road to the meter pit adjacent to the Effluent Sampler Building. The revised grading
requirements improve drainage for the area. The access road was not shown on the contract drawings
but is needed for maintenance access. This work was negotiated with the contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions (Reference Field Change Order No. 6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER:
TOT AL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER:
$ 6,309.00
O Calendar Days
$50,415.00
0 Calendar Days
f
Contractor:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Advanco Constructors. Inc. CO. No. TwoC2l
Page 3 of 4
Job:
Date: August 27. 1997
Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade. Job No. J-34-1. Phase II Site and Securitv Improvements.
Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access. Job No. SP19950003
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work
and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by
this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time
is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs,
expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date:
Original Contract Time:
Original Completion Date:
Time Extension this C.O.:
Total Contract Time Extension:
Revised Contract Time:
Revised Final Completion Due Date:
January 9, 1997
730 Calendar Days
January 8, 1999
0 Calendar Days
0 Calendar Days
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price
Prev. Authorized Changes
This Change (Add)(Dedt1et)
Amended Contract Price
$ 7. 122.693.00
$ (4. 170.00)
$ 50.415.00
$ 7. 168.938.00
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Page 4of4 \
Contractor: Advanco Constructors. Inc. CO. No. TwoC2l
Job:
Date: August 27. 1997
Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrade. Job No. J-34-1. Phase II Site and Security Improvements.
Job No. P2-35-5. Conveyor Belt Access. Job No. SP19950003
Board Authorization Date: August 27, 1997
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
_Re__Jvie~-w~ed~by~;j 21"'~~~· . ·~i;;J~--~~~---=i.uZ3!!.g{ f :f
Date
Accepted by:
Sub~by:
0-· ~ Co~StrUCiion Manager
2-U--t'z
Date
Approved as to Form:
!\
tMEETING DATE
OMTS:
PDC:S/7/97
FAHR:
EXEC:
STEER:
JT.BDS: 8/27/97
DISTRICT NO.
All
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
AGENDA
ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
CONTACT FOR INFORMATION
(Originator}
720, Jim Herberg, ext. 5086
Division No., Name, and Extension
ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR PRELIMINARY
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL WORK (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating Committee
requests approval of selection of Black and Veatch for preliminary engineering and environmental work in
support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project.
Recommended Action(sl:
1. Approve selection of Black and Veatch to provide Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Work for the
OCR Project, in an amount not to exceed $449,500 as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee
on July 29, 1997. The Districts share is $224,750, or fifty percent of the of total fee of $449,500 in accordance
with the Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated
February 26, 1997.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE
Date Notice of Exemption Filed:
Negative Declaration Approved on
Final EIR Approved on _and Notice of Determination filed on _
CURRENT BUDGET/COST
INFORMATION
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $500,000
SOURCE: CORF
Schedule/Line ltems:C. 9
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
INFORMATION
First Year tn Budget:
Master Plan Estimate:
Year of First Costs:
THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST
INFORMATION
CURRENT YEAR
BUDGET AMOUNT
(FY 97-98)
$500,000
ORIGINAL BUDGET
TOTAL
NIA
ORIGINAL BID, PO,
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
NA
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO
If YES, state number: _ Permanent Limited Term
Revised 05/14197
H:\WP. OTA \ENG\3730\HERBERG\AITOCR.2
DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
February 26, 1997
CURRENT YEAR·
TO-DATE
EXPENDITURES
$0
PREVIOUS BUDGET
CHANGES
N/A
CHANGE ORDERS,
FUNDS PREV.
APPROVED
$0.00
YEAR-TO-DATE
BUDGET BALANCE
$500,000
BUDGET CHANGE
THISAlT
$0.00
AMOUNT
REQUESTED THIS
AIT
$224,750.00
REVISED BUDGET
TOTAL
(Total Budget plus
Transfers)
$500,000
REVISED TOTAL
PROJECT BUDGET
$116,000,000.00
AMENDED
PROJECT AMOUNT
$0.00
REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE
If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
Page 1 of 2
Originator
Date
/J3-f1
Date
Sig a
Assistant Genera! Manager (Or Designee)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
..,,.,,,.,: ..
ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List): ··~~-"." J • • -$)
·i. ·Agenda Item Submittal from July 29, 19~.
OCR Project Coordinating Committee
Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List)
1. Agenda Item Submittal from July 29, 1997
OCR Project Project Coordinating
Meeting.
See attached Agenda Item Submittal from July 29, 1997 OCR Project Coordinating Committee.
c: Department Head
A GM-Ad ministration
A GM-Operations
General Manager
Revised 05/14197
H:\WP. OTA \ENG\3730\HERBERG\AITOCR .2
Page 2 of2
AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL
MEETING DATE: July 29, 1997
TO: Joint OCR Project Cooperative
Committee
FROM: William R. Mills Jr.
Donald F. Mcintyre
Staff Contact: Thomas M. Dawes
Budgeted: Yes
Program/Line Item No.: 901-4030-600. 701 O
Cost Estimate: $450, 000. 00 -
General Counsel Approval: Pending
Engineers/Feasibility Report Approved: Pending
CEQA Compliance: Pending
SUBJECT: CONSUL TANT SELECTION FOR THE OCR PROJECT PRELIMINARY
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE.
SUMMARY:
Staff of the Orange County Water District, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the
United States Bureau of Reclamation have evaluated the proposals received from the five (5)
pre-approved teams and recommend award of a professional services contract for engineering
and environmental work.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the staff report dated July 21, 1997 on the selection process followed for the OCR
Project preliminary engineering and environmental compliance work, and award a professional
service contract for completion of said work to Black & Veatch in an amount not to exceed
$449,500.00.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
Staff has completed a lengthy and detailed process to select a team of engineering and
environmental specialists to prepare a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and serve as an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) .. The work includes preparation of a Supplement to the Engineer's Report on the
OCR Project, providing additional information necessary to support the environmental process,
and information needed by the United States Bureau of Reclamation for project evaluation
under federal guidelines. The engineering supplement will also provide additional data
requested by this committee and by the CSDOC/OCWD staff team for project development.
As detailed in the attached July 21 staff report, the selection process started with a solicitation
of statement of qualifications (SQQ) from environmental and engineering teams, pre-
qualification of teams based on the SOQ's; preparation of a Request for Proposal with a
detailed scope of work, and final evaluation of the proposals, including presentations by the $
proposing teams, all evaluated by staff from CSDOC, OCWD and USBR (proposals only).
While the evaluation team found all the consultants to be highly qualified for this work, it is
recommended that the committee recommend award of a professional services contract to
Black & Veatch in an amount not to exceed $449,500.00. If the committee makes a
recommendation on award of a professional contract, the recommendation will proceed to the
CSDOC's Planning Design and Construction Committee and then to the CSDOC and OCWD
Board of Directors for final approval consideration in August.
PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S):
Committee approval of RFP process on May 13, 1997.
Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project
EIR/EIS and Supplemental Engineering Request for Proposal
Evaluation and Selection Process
Introduction and Summary
A thirteen (13) member evaluation committee made up of staff from the Orange County
Water District, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, and the United States
Bureau of Reclamation has reviewed the proposals and evaluated the presentations of
the five (5) pre-qualified teams proposing on the preliminary engineering and
environmental work for the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation (OCR)
Project. The five teams, a combination of environmental firms and engineering firms
(plus specialty consultants in some cases), are all highly qualified to do the work
outlined in the Scope of Services. The team selection process, described below and
previously approved by this committee, was very thorough and detailed. This report
describes the evaluation process that led to the staff recommendation.
Based on the proposals and, to a lesser extent, the presentations, the staff selection team
recommends that a professional services contract be awarded to Black & Veatch in an
amount not to exceed $449,500.
The Evaluation and Selection Process
On November 20, 1996, the OCWD Board authorized solicitation of Statements of
Qualifications from qualified consulting firms to prepare California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance
documents and provide engineering necessary to support document preparation. The
Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFQ) was advertised in the Orange County
Register, by direct mailing, through two engineering marketing services and by word-
of-mouth. Fifty-six copies of the RFQ were distributed. Seven teams responded to the
RFQ by submitting a Statement of Qualifications. On May 13, 1997, the Joint OCR
Project Cooperative Committee authorized staff to solicit proposals from the five top-
rated teams. Proposals were received on July 3, 1997 9 from each of the five teams that
were pre-qualified.
An evaluation team with various areas of expertise was formed to review the proposals.
The team consisted of OCWD/CSDOC staff members and a member of USBR as
shown in Table 1.
1
Evaluator
Susan Bradford
Steve Conklin
Tom Dawes
Elizabeth Flammini
Jim Herberg
Roy Herndon
John Kennedy
Del Kidd
Larry Kraemer
Greg Leslie
Dave Ludwin
Tama Snow
Doug Stewart
Table 1
Evaluation Team
Aeency Title
OCWD Principal Regulatory Investigator
OCWD Director of Engineering
OCWD/CSDOC OCR Project Manager
OCWD Senior Engineer -Advance Planning
CSDOC Engineering Supervisor
OCWD District Hydrogeologist
OCWD Director of Advance Planning
USBR Environmental Protection Specialist
CSDOC Engineer
OCWD Senior Engineer
CS DOC Director of Engineering
OCWD Senior Engineer -Advance Planning
CS DOC Enjdneering Manager
The evaluation team reviewe~ the written proposals from July 3, 1997 to July 16, 1997
and oral presentations of the five proposing teams were held on July 17, 1997. The
proposals and interviews were evaluated based on the following criteria:
• Related experience and qualifications of team and proposed key staff as
determined by the Statement of Qualifications and proposals.
• Understanding of the project scope, content, creativity and how scope will
be accomplished.
• Time commitment of key staff and ability to provide necessary staff by
experienced practitioners.
• Record of success on similar projects.
• Knowledge and experience in working with environmental groups,
regulatory agencies and local government officials.
• Potential conflicts resulting from obligation to other clients, if any.
• Ability and success of proposed key engineering and environmental staff
working together as a team on past projects.
• Ability to meet aggressive project schedule.
• Ability to work with public relations firm.
• Content of oral presentation; approach, logic, and creativity.
• Communication skills; ability to respond to questions and communicate
clearly and effectively.
+ Estimated fee for providing services outlined in the scope.
• Other criteria determined by the selection committee.
The selection criteria listed above were incorporated into the proposal and oral
presentation evaluation sheets. The evaluation criteria followed the OCWD Board-
2
.. -
...... v
approved Consultant Selection Procedure. Each member of the team completed written
evaluatio:a sheets for both the proposals and oral presentations (the forms are included
as Attachment 1). The weightings of the criteria were determined by the consensus of
the evaluation team in advance of the proposals being reviewed.
Each proposed team was allotted 45 minutes to make a presentation and answer
questions from the evaluation team. The evaluation team asked each firm a list of pre-
determined questions provided those questions had not been addressed in the firm's
presentation. The predetermined questions are included as Attachment 2. The
evaluation team also asked questions based on each team's presentation. Based on this
evaluation process, the following ranking of the proposing firms was developed as
shown in Table 2. Also included in Table 2 are the fee estimates that were submitted
under separate cover by each of the firms.
Table 2
Ranking of Firms to Prepare
EIR/EIS and Supplemental Engineers Report
Rankin2 Firms
1 Black & Veatch w/ P& D Consultants
2 Boyle w/ Jones & Stokes Associates
3 ESA w/ CH2M Hill
4 Parsons Engineering Science w I HY A
5 CDM w/ Planning Consultants Research
Fee
$449,500
$459,890
$448,953
$450,000
$429,175
Note that throughout the following report, individual team members are not named in
relation to the scores or comments. In the interest of preserving the integrity of the RFP
process and the team-based approach to the evaluation, the evaluators have been
assigned numbers. The number assignments are consistent throughout the report.
Numerical Evaluation
For the proposal and oral presentation evaluations, Table 3 summarizes the total points
that each of the proposing teams received from the evaluation committee. The scores
given by each of the individual evaluation team members is provided in Attachment 3.
3
Table 3
Ranking of Proposals and Oral Presentations
Proposal Oral
Presentation
Total Points Total Points Grand Total
Received Received Points Received
Proposine Firms (910 Possible) (390 Possible) (1,300 Possible)
Black & Veatch w/ P& D Consultants 811.5 367.8 1,179.3
Boyle w/ Jones & Stokes Associates 769.4 360.5 1,129.9
ESA w/ CH2M Hill 725.6 355.0 1,080.6
Parsons Engineering Science w/ HY A 700.0 336.5 1,036.5
CDM w/ Planning Consultants 655.5 207.1 862.6
Research
As shown in Table 3 above, the team led by Black & Veatch clearly received the
highest rating for both their. proposal and oral presentation, followed closely by the
teams led by Boyle, ESA, Parsons Engineering Science, and CDM, respectively.
Narrative Comments
Following is a brief description of each of the teams that proposed and the narrative
comments that were received from various evaluation committee members.
Black & Veatch/P&D Consultants/Montgomery Watson
Black & Veatch will be the lead firm and will coordinate the activities between the
various consultants. Black & Veatch will prepare the Supplement to the Engineer's
Report and will be assisted by Montgomery Watson. P&D Consultants will prepare the
EIR/EIS.
Evaluator 1: This is an excellent team. They have experts in A WT facilities, sanitation
facilities, river corridor issues and environmental work. The principal is an expert in
water project development. The team understands this project, the environment and
public health. This team could do an excellent job.
Evaluator 2: Project Manager is very familiar with the District. Lead Engineer has
worked on San Diego Project. They made good technical points in the RFP regarding
TOC issues and how the EIR must explain the need for the project from a water supply
perspective. They have prepared a model to assist with analysis of alternatives. They
have some individuals on team that will be very helpful in obtaining permits and
4
Ranking
1
2
3
4
5
working with agencies. Appears team has not worked together on a large reclamation
project.
Evaluator 3: This team was strong in specifics. They understood the many aspects that
go into preparing a good EIR/EIS, and seemed to know how to get there. They also
wanted the engineering elements and compliance process integrated into a "seamless"
unit. Uniting these two elements would help both facets of this proposed project. The
team understands the importance of meeting the schedule, and are strongly committed
to doing that. Again, from what is presented in their proposal, this team would do a
credible job for the Districts.
Evaluator 4: This team appeared to have a good understanding of the scope of work
and a good approach to getting the job complete. The core people proposed for the
project have related experience. This team emphasized and reemphasized how
important the schedule was and that they would meet it. Concerned with the number of
subconsultants proposed due to the amount of coordination that will be required.
Number of hours proposed to do the job appears reasonable.
Evaluator 5: Proposal shows an excellent understanding of issues related to the project.
Team has designed or participated in design/build of seven demineralization plants.
Strong team with experienced practitioners. This team appears to have the most
experience with designing membrane treatment plants. The team includes Carl Nelson
and Jim Crook who would be excellent assets with respect to acquiring the necessary
permits from the County and ACOE ~d working with DHS.
EvaluatGr 6: hnpressive team with B & V and Montgomery Watson together. The
core team of Argo, Salenius and Richardson all have good related experience. Good
presentation of project issues and approach.
Evaluator 7: Best overall approach and statement of key EIR/EIS permitting hurdles.
Primary emphasis on public health protection, perception issues and regulatory
approval. Substantial staff experience on reclamation projects, EIR' s and engineering
design.
Evaluator 8: Team appears to have done research on pipeline alignments. Experience
with OCWD and CSDOC. Jim Crook would be an asset to this project. Above average
water treatment experience. Good related experience.
Evaluator 9: Very strong proposal. Team understands that the EIR/EIS process is the
public facet of the project. The team has identified the key technical issues, such as lack
of vadose zone and treatment train design, that will require the most flexibility. The
team has good qualifications on large pipeline projects (e.g. The Inland Feeder) and
have identified several options to mitigate potential problems associated with alignment
of the pipeline. This is a strong proposal. The only weakness is that the team is not as
5
experienced with the EIR/EIS process for reclamation projects as the ESA/CH2M Hill
team or the ES/HY A team.
Evaluator 10: The approach given is very specific regarding numerous issues and
seems to indicate deep understanding of the project. The team has very strong
experience. Overall, an excellent proposal.
Evaluator 11: Project Manager's experience and expertise seems uniquely suited for
this project. The wide range of experience available on this team makes this an
exceptionally strong team. The staff shown in this proposal are those who will actually
be performing the day to day work. Would like to have seen a stronger environmental
team, but this team can do the job.
Evaluator 12: Excellent local experience and regulatory experience. Strong EIR
experience. Sylvia Salenius has extensive water and wastewater EIR experience.
Proposal identified the TOC and vadose zone concerns and concerns with current
pipeline alignment and provided potential solutions.
Evaluator 13: A well put together team. Very strong in water reclamation technology,
permitting and environmental issues. A very good technical presentation of the
important issues.
Boyle Engineering/Jones & Stokes~colm Pirnie
Boyle will be the lead consultant for this team and will coordinate the overall
management activities. Boyle will also be responsible for the preparation of the
Supplemental Engineer's Report. The AWT evaluation will be done by both Malcolm
Pirnie and Boyle. Jones & Stokes will be a subconsultant to Boyle and will be
responsible for the preparation of the EIR/EIS.
Evaluator 1: This is an excellent team. They understand the schedule and the project.
Jones & Stokes is an excellent environmental firm, perhaps the best. Malcolm Pirnie
brings A WT experience. Boyle knows local issues and how to manage a large project.
This team could do an excellent job.
Evaluator 2: The Project Manager is very easy to work with and understands the
District. They have a good understanding of the project. Very good technical people
which will help resolve some key project issues such as disinfection & CSDOC needs.
The team has experience on the San Diego Project.
Evaluator 3: This team had a good theoretical understanding of the compliance
process. For example, they knew that a well crafted "Purpose and Need" could narrow
down the number of reasonable alternatives. Alternatives are the heart of the NEPA
process. There were other instances, but the "Purpose and Need" revealed they
understand the importance of preparing a good EIR/EIS. Their engineering proposal
6
also seemed more than acceptable. They are aware that the schedule is aggressive, and
are committed to meeting it. From what was presented in their proposal, this team
would do a credible job for the Districts.
Evaluator 4: Team has related experience. Currently working on the San Diego
Project. People proposed have a wealth of experience. Jones & Stokes appears to be an
excellent environmental firm and has prepared numerous EIR' s. Concerned that the
proposed key people may not have the time to dedicate to this project. The number of
hours proposed is high relative to other teams.
Evaluator 5: Clear and logical approach to project objectives and EIR/EIS explanation.
Good ideas with respect to facilities design. Key staff appear to be experienced and well
qualified. Experience gained from San Diego Project will be directly applicable to OCR
Project. Seem very well versed with respect to available treatment alternatives. Kris
Lindstrom would be an asset to have on this project with respect to RWQCB and his
work with CSDOC in preparing the waiver application.
Evaluator 6: Fairly strong, but not outstanding, project staff. Fairly good· experience.
Having MPI on the team adds significantly to the team's technical capabilities with
membrane projects. Proposal shows the highest proposed man-hours at 5172. Average
for the five proposals is 4662.
Evaluator 7: Emphasized public concerns on water quality and health issues to address
in EIR. Made distinction between EIR and EIS. Boyle and Pirnie are teamed on San
Diego A WT. Strong in engineering but proposal did not indicate substantial experience
doing EIR's for reclamation projects. No hydrogeology or groundwater modeling staff
in proposal.
Evaluator 8: Team appears to have a good understanding of the project. Excellent
mixture of technical staff in all disciplines. Very well known experts in the field of
A WT. Have worked with OCWD and CSDOC on many planning projects and have
been successful.
Evaluator 9: Without a doubt, "Start Design in 99" is a slick slogan for a proposal for
the program EIR/EIS and supplement to the engineering report. The consultants have
assembled a talented team. The experience with the San Diego Repurification project
would indicate that this team could easily provide the engineering support for the
EIR/EIS process. Also the team is sensitive to the issues raised by the public relations
firm including public art, process reliability, and public access to the treatment train.
The inclusion of Chris Lindstrom would suggest seamless coordination of the previous
environmental work with both the CSDOC strategic plan and the OCR feasibility study.
The detailed work effort suggests that the team recognizes the importance of a
successful program EIR/EIS (4038 h out of 5172 h). The preponderance of time
allocated for the engineering component is astutely allocated to site and corridor
studies, visual displays, Engineer's Report Supplement and EIR/EIS support.
7
Furthermore, it is very encouraging that Bill Everest will be leading the engineering
effort. It would be very easy for both OCWD and CSDOC staff to work with Bill
Everest. The inclusion of Garret Westerhoff in the QA/QC meetings is also an asset to
this proposal. One weakness is that the team does not have as much experience in EIR
work on reclamation projects of this type or interaction with the Bureau of Reclamation
as some of the other teams. Also, on face value the proposal did not contain as much
detail on potential mitigation issues associated with alignment of the pipe as one of the
other proposals. Similarly, the hydrogeology component was not as strong as one of the
proposals. These weaknesses, however, only slightly detract from a very clear and
concise proposal.
Evaluator 10: Boyle's approach is very solid and conveys a very strong understanding
of OCR issues. Bill Everest is an excellent choice for project manager due to his
experience and the fact that he's easy to work with. Malcolm Pirnie adds good process
experience. Jones & Stokes is also a strong environmental firm.
Evaluator 11: Excellent understanding of scope and approach to environmental
preparation. Proposed a very strong team and this team did their homework. Question
Boyle's and Malcolm Pirnie's availability with the current San Diego work.
Evaluator 12: Detailed project approach. Designed San Diego Project and designed
Expansion to Water Factory 21. Good regulatory experience.
Evaluator 13: Excellent experience with water reclamation at San Diego. Very good
EIR firm in Jones & Stokes. Clear presentation of issues. Man-hours appeared high
compared to others. Good pipeline and pump station experience.
ESA/CH2M Hill
The lead consultant proposed for this team is ESA. ESA would be responsible for
coordinating the subconsultant's activities and would prepare the EIR/EIS. CH2M Hill
would provide assistance to ESA and would be responsible for preparation of the
Supplemental Engineering Report.
Evaluator 1: ESA brings an exceptionally strong environmental presence to this
project. CH2M Hill complements with AWT experience. ESA is doing the
environmental work for CSDOC' s new Strategic Plan which could help with
coordination. This team is weak in overall local permitting issues, but could do this job
very well.
Evaluator 2: The overall team is good and qualified with related experience. The
Project Manager appears to be very good, but I am unaware if she has much experience
working with the Districts or the local regulators. It appears that the team is already
looking for extra work items.
8
Evaluator 3: This team makes a very strong commitment to having the project
manager, Leslie Moulton, work full time on the project. She appears to have excellent
credentials for managing the engineering and compliance process. This team also had a
number of excellent ideas on how to improve the functioning of the overall project.
This team would do a credible job for the Districts.
Evalµator 4: This team has good related experience and is currently working with
CSDOC on an impact analysis. Lead project manager does not appear to have as much
experience as other team leaders. However, the proposed team is strong and as a whole
appears to be more than capable of completing this project. John Gaston is very well
known and would be an asset to have on this project.
Evaluator S: Team suggested additional components that could be integrated into the
OCR Project which demonstrates innovative and visionary thinking. Proposed project
manager, Leslie Moulton, is well qualified for this work. Currently preparing BIR for
CSDOC Strategic Plan. This work could be directly applied to the OCR Project. Not
sure how familiar project manager is with local environmental groups and regulatory
officials.
Evaluator 6: Leslie Moulton., proposed overall project manager, has excellent relevant
experience, including CEQA/NEPA documents for six water reuse projects in the last
five years. BSA and CH2M Hill jointly prepared the Dublin San Ramon Groundwater
Recharge Program BIR. Both firms have worked on several reclamation projects,
including proposed senior staff. The proposal showed initiative and thought by
describing optional tasks that could expand the project and its capabilities. Their
project team appears to have the most related experience of all the teams.
Evaluator 7: Approach appears to meet the requirements of the scope; however, there
was insufficient emphasis placed on public awareness and public perception issues that
must be addressed during the BIR. Team has comprehensive relevant experience in key
areas including qualified hydrogeologists and groundwater modelers.
Evaluator 8: Appears to have a good understanding of the project. Understands
CSDOC's concern for reliability. Level of effort appears low. Proposed staff appears
qualified. Does not appear to be enough staff proposed to get the project completed
within the tight schedule. Knowledgeable and experienced in EIS/BIR process. Both
firms appear to have relevant and related experience.
Evaluator 9: Team has experience working together. Team recogni7.es the importance
of continuity between OCR BIR and CSDOC Strategic Plan.
Evaluator 10: Good team, particularly Leslie Moulton, John Gaston, and Bruce
Mowry. These three individuals have excellent combined experience. Their experience
on the Dublin San Ramon Project is relevant to OCR. Their approach was well
organized, but not as detailed as some of the other firms.
9
Evaluator 11: Team had a very strong environmental approach but seemed short of
staffing on the engineering side in the written proposal. Showed a good, seamless team
approach. Tremendous experience with West and Central Basin Reclamation Projects.
Evaluator 12: Presented innovative ideas in Appendix A. Project approach is logical.
ESA currently working on CSDOC's Strategic Plan and EIR. Prepared EIR for Dublin
San Ramon. Project Manager does not appear to have experience with local Southern
California Agencies.
Evaluator 13: ESA has good experience with reclamation type projects in California.
Good understanding of EIR issues. CH2M Hill provides engineering support necessary
for EIR. Currently preparing CSDOC Strategic Plan EIR which would provide
continuity of EIR' s.
Parsons Engineering Science/HY A
If selected, this project team will be managed by Engineering Science. Engineering
Science will be responsible for preparing the EIR/EIS and will assist with the A WT
evaluation. HY A will provide support to Engineering Science in preparing the
supplement to the engineer's report.
Evaluator 1: This team has an excellent leader in Kasper. They have good AWT
-experience and have prepared environmental documents on similar but much smaller
projects. They don't have the local experience or CSDOC experience that some of the
others have. They could do a very good job.
Evaluator 2: This team has some very good individuals with recent experience on large
reclamation projects. The Project Engineer is very good and credible in front of an
audience. However, it appears that the team has limited, if any, experience working
together.
Evaluator 3: This team's proposal was generic in its presentation. Nothing really stood
out in my mind even though the proposal was read twice. However, the team has been
involved in many other similar projects.
Evaluator 4: This team has been involved in numerous water reclamation projects
throughout California. The Parsons Engineering Science team appears to be extremely
strong and capable of preparation of the EIR/EIS. While HY A has been involved in
many reclamation projects, they are not able to present experience applicable to this
project such as knowledge of microfiltration, reverse osmosis, groundwater injection,
groundwater modeling, etc. Not sure what HYA contributes to the overall team.
Number of hours appear to be excessive relative to other teams. It does not appear that
they have worked together on past projects of this nature.
10
Evaluator S: Excellent overall project approach including technical advisory panel that
has led to successful environmental documents. Team has excellent record of success in
preparing environmental documents for reclamation projects, none of which have been
challenged. Proposed project manager Dennis Kasper is highly respected in the
environmental field. -Harvey Collins would be an asset to have on this project with his
experience as Chief of the Division of Drinking Water for Department of Health
Services and Chairman of the SARWQH Study.
Evaluator 6: Best presentation of key issues and how they should be addressed; very
clear and concise. Project team is fairly strong, with Dennis Kasper as the project
manager. Team has good experience in reclamation projects.
Evaluator 7: Good emphasis on public concerns of "unknowns". Numerous EIR/EIS
projects for water reclamation noted including the West Basin Water Reclamation
Project. Team did not propose any qualified hydrogeology modeling staff to review
OCWD's work in Forebay and at Talbert Barrier.
Evaluator 8: Identified long range health effects, TOC, and Viral DNA. Good team to
develop cost estimate. Appear strong in the environmental area but not so strong on the
engineering side. Knowledge .and experience appears to be above average.
Evaluator 9: Demonstrated good understanding of project. Team has best experience
and success on the EIR/EIS process for indirect potable reuse projects. Team has
success in working with the Bureau of Reclamation.
Evaluator 10: Engineering Science lists a great deal of involvement in other
reclamation projects. Strong team, but approach doesn't seem quite as strong. Overall,
the proposed approach is not very specific to OCR Project.
Evaluator 11: Proposal was very heavy on the engineering side and light on the
environmental. Not all of the top names in proposal appeared in the workload
distribution chart. It appeared that they would look to CSDOC Staff for support on the
treatment plant evaluation. Team has good experience, however, does not appear that
they have stretched any boundaries on the innovation envelope.
Evaluator 12: Logical project approach. Prepared EIR for Terminal Island and West
Basin Water Reclamation Project.
Evaluator 13: Approach to project was presented well. Project manager bas limited
AWT experience. Team has limited experience with OCWD and CSDOC. West Basin
EIR is good experience. Man-hour estimate is high compared to other teams estimates.
11
CDM/Planning Consultants Research (PCR)
CDM would be the lead consultant for this project and coordinate the teams activities.
PCR would be responsible for preparation of the EIR/EIS and CDM would be
responsible for preparation of the supplemental engineers report.
Evaluator 1: This team offers a strong project leader who is managing the strategic
plan for CSDOC. This is a great plus in that project coordination issues would be
eased. This team recognizes the potential of a future water education and research
center. This team could do a very good job.
Evaluator 2: Project Manager is very easy to deal with and able to get work
accomplished despite bureaucracies. The lead engineer & Em team members lack
experience on large reclamation projects. Appears the team does not have much local
experience also.
Evaluator 3: This team's main concern is with the engineering aspects of the project,
and it appears that they have a firm grasp in this area. The compliance seems to be, at
best, an afterthought. If the engineering is the most important aspect of the proposal,
then this team appears to be an excellent one.
Evaluator 4: This team really emphasized the engineering aspect of this project and it
appeared from the proposal that the EIR/EIS was secondary. The total number of hours
proposed appeared reasonable. However, more hours were attributed to the engineering
effort than the EIR/EIS effort.
Evaluator 5: Currently working on CSDOC Strategic Plan therefore, the learning
curve with respect to CSDOC 's interests would be minimal. Proposal lacked
suggestions for innovation. Team has worked together on large projects including Playa
Vista and LAX Master Plan. Proposed project manager John Price was the project
manager for the Tustin Desalter. Proposal focused more on engineering and missed the
primary objective which is environmental compliance.
Evaluator 6: The executive summary indicates that the issue of regulatory and public
approval and acceptance are significant potential roadblocks. However, the proposal
does not describe how these will be addressed and mitigated. The two projects that
these firms have worked on together are not water projects. Greg Vail, proposed
project manager for EIR/EIS, has not done such for a water or water reclamation
project. Does Kelly Bum-Lucht, the proposed project director, have the time to direct
this project and the CSDOC masterplan? PCR lists little or no experience in water
reclamation EIR' s.
Evaluator 7: Detailed discussion of engineering aspects of supplemental engineering
report but grossly understated importance of EIR/EIS process which is the key purpose
12
of this contract. Very few, if any, EIR/EIS projects done by PCR staff on water and
wastewater reclamation. No indication of CDM and PCR working together on past
projects. Proposal did not indicate that this team had any previous experience with
public involvement.
Evaluator 8: Level of effort appears low compared to others. Kelle Bum-Lucht is an
asset to this team, excellent project coordinator. Appear to have a strong team but does
not appear to be as strong as others. CDM currently working with CSDOC preparing
strategic plan.
Evaluator 9: A very competent proposal. The team is very familiar with the technical
issues involved in the project. The consultants have demonstrated an excellent
understanding of current and future trends in most aspects of the design and operation
of large scale membrane and conveyance process. The proposal contained an excellent
description of water quality and quantity. The consultants identified important
geological and seismic concerns with the alignment of the pipeline in the SAR channel
and proposed innovative solutions for realignment based on the "separate reach"
concept. Finally, the consultants also recognized the potential of the OCR Project to be
a premier municipal reclamation plant and proposed the development of an International
Water Resource Campus. Sµch a campus would fully exploit the development and
training possibilities of the OCR Project and the consultants are to be commended for
recognizing this important aspect of the project. The detailed level of effort, however,
was skewed in favor of the engineering component of the program EIR and the
Supplement to the Engineer's Report (396 h+ 1626 h) rather than the environmental
component (77 h + 1186 h). The consultants did not emphasize the importance of
evaluating (or discounting) project alternatives. The proposal only briefly described an
approach to mitigate unforeseen problems and the importance of responding promptly
and decisively to public and institutional concerns. With the exception of the 30 mgd
project in Madras, the team has not had as much experience as other teams with
indirect potable reuse projects. There is no doubt that this team could design the full
OCR Project, however, at this stage the project requires more emphasis on the
importance of satisfying the NEPA and CEQA requirements in concert with the public
relations program.
Evaluator 10: Kelle Bum-Lucht is an excellent project manager and brings knowledge
of CSDOC and linkage with OCR and the Strategic Plan. CDM has strong membrane
design experience. I am surprised that PCR doesn't have much (any) experience with
reclaimed water or potable reuse project EIR's. The proposal didn't seem to have much
emphasis on the EIR.
Evaluator 11: Excellent written approach to project. CDM provided an in-depth
analysis of the project. Proposal seems very weighted to having Kelle Bum-Lucht as the
project manager. Question whether that is appropriate with all her other commitments
to CSDOC Strategic Plan. Did not appear to have as strong of a backfield as some of
the other proposals.
13
Evaluator 12: Limited reclamation experience. CDM currently preparing CSDOC
Strategic Plan. There may be a time conflict with OCR EIR and CSDOC Strategic Plan.
Limited regulatory work.
Evaluator 13: Good insights into scope of work requirements. Understands CSDOC's
needs through work on the Strategic Plan. Good project director that's easy to work
with. It does not appear that the EIR project manager has prepared an EIR for a water
reclamation project. Too many hours allocated for the project director, more than the
project manager. The man-hour estimate for the engineering is higher than the EIR
effort.
Conclusion
Significant consideration must go into the evaluation and selection of an environmental
and engineering team to prepare an EIR/EIS Document so that approval of the OCR
Project can be received. All five of the proposing teams are well qualified for this
project. Note that the firms submitted their fee proposals under separate cover and the
evaluation team did not open the envelopes until after the proposal and oral presentation
rankings were completed. Tl~e overall ranking of the firms and their proposed fees are
as follows:
Ranking Firms Fee
1 Black & Veatch w/ P& D Consultants $449,500
2 Boyle w/ Jones & Stokes Associates $459,890
3 ESA w/ CH2M Hill $448,953
4 Parson Engineering Science w/ HY A $450,000
5 CDM w/ Planning Consultants Research $429,175
The evaluation team consisting of OCWD, CSDOC and the United States Bureau of
Reclamation staff recommend the team led by Black & Veatch based on the evaluation
process outlined above. The staff evaluation team recommends award of a professional
services agreement to Black & Veatch in the amount not to exceed $449,500. This
report is respectfully submitted for your consideration.
h:\documents\tss\narrative comments
14
b
-;
··,
.'·.
ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM
PROJECT: OCR Protect Environmental/Engineering Proposals
DATE: -----
WEIGHT REVIEWER'S WEIGHTING
EVALUATION x
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE (1-5) SCORE COMMENTS
1. Projed Approach and Schedule 4
(understanding of what is required, clear
presentation of how the scope will be
accomplished, innovative ideas for
approaching the projed, and
identification of possible areas of
concern and potential solutions)
2. Experience and Qualifications of Key 3
Staff (including experience with working
together previously as a team on large,
multi-faceted water reclamation projects)
3. Time Commitment of Key Staff (ability 2
to provide necessary staffing by
experienced practitioners)
tr• . ~.
4 . Record of Experience and Success on 3
Similar Projects
5. Knowledge of and experience in 2
working with environmental groups,
regulators, and local government
officials.
SUBTOTAL (total score possible= 70 14
oints
6. Presentation (see evaluation form for
basis of score)
TOTAL (total score possible = 100
points
Scoring: 5 = Excellent
4 = Above Average
3 = Average
2 = Poor
1 = Unacceptable
t.... ..
PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM
PROJECT: OCR Project Environmental/Engineering Proposal Presentations
PROPOSING FIRM ______________ REVIEWER: -----
EVALUATION CRITERIA
1. Content I (approach, logic, etc.)
2. Content II (creativity)
3. Project Team Compatibility
4. Communication Skills (clear
communicators, proficiency
using audio visual equipment,
able to think quickly on their
feet, answered questions
satisfactorily, etc.)
TOTAL
Scoring: 3 =
2 =
1 =
0 =
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Poor
WEIGHT OF
CRITERIA
3
2
2
3
10
REVIEWER'S
EVALUATION
SCORE (0-3)
WEIGHTING
x
SCORE
Total possible= 30 points
DATE: July 17. 1997
COMMENTS
Attachment 2
General questions for all consulting teams Interviews on July 17, 1997
1. Are the people presented in the proposal the actual staff that will be working on the
project?
2. What is the staff's availability? How much time will key staff devote to this project?
3. Approximately how many other projects has the proposed team worked together on?
Was it the same staff members?
4. Where are the key people located, what offices?
5. We were told yesterday by the SWRCB that, if we submit the BIR in September, the
OCR Project could possibly qualify for an SRF loan commitment. How difficult
would it be for you to acc~lerate your schedule and have the BIR complete in
September?
6. In a public hearing, Disney in conjunction with the City of Anaheim have voiced
strong concerns that the OCR Project water may contain mutagenic compounds.
They are especially concerned about production of these compounds as a result of
chlorination. How would you address these concerns?
7. How do you see your team interacting with the public relations team?
Evaluator
1
2
3
4
5
6 -7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Totals
Note:
Attachment 3
Numerical Breakdown of Proposal and Oral Presentation Evaluations
by
Evaluator
PROPOSING FIRMS
Black & Veatch Boyle ESA Parsons ES
Proposal Oral Pres. Total Proposal Oral Pres. Total Proposal Oral Pres. Total Proposal Oral Pres.
70.0 30.0 100.0 68.5 30.0 98.5 65.0 30.0 95.0 60.0 27.0
65.0 29.0 94.0 65.5 30.0 95.5 64.5 28.5 93.0 64.0 28.5
64.0 30.0 94.0 66.0 30.0 96.0 52.0 29.0 81.0 48.0 24.5
62.5 29.0 91.5 62.4 30.0 92.4 48.6 28.0 76.6 40.5 23.0
62.0 28.0 90.0 58.0 27.0 85.0 63.0 22.0 85.0 65.0 28.0
60.5 28.0 88.5 54.5 29.0 83.5 61.5 28.0 89.5 61.5 28.0
56.0 28.0 84.0 48.0 22.0 70.0 48.0 23.0 71.0 52.0 24.0
60.5 25.0 85.5 63.0 26.0 89.0 56.0 28.5 84.5 54.0 28.0 ----63.0 27.8 90.8 65.5 26.5 92.0 58.5 27.0 85.5 62.0 28.0
51.0 28.0 79.0 44.0 30.0 74.0 52.5 25.0 77.5 54.0 23.5
63.0 27.0 90.0 57.0 25.0 82.0 55.0 30.0 85.0 40.0 28.0 -70.0 28.0 98.0 63.0 28.0 91.0 48.0 26.0 74.0 64.0 24.0 -· 64.0 30.0 94.0 54.0 27.0 81.0 53.0 30.0 83.0 35.0 22.0
811.5 367.8 1179.3 769.4 360.5 1129.9 725.6 355.0 1080.6 700.0 336.5
(1) Possible points per evaluator: Proposal = 70; Oral Presentation = 30;
(2) Total possible points per firm= (13 evaluators)x(100 Points)= 1300 points;
H:\doc\tss\Evaluatlon Rating
COM
Total Proposal Oral Pres. Total
87.0 64.0 21.0 85.0
92.5 64.5 24.0 88.5
72.5 44.0 21.0 65.0
63.5 46.0 12.0 58.0
93.0 47.0 13.0 60.0
89.5 54.5 17.0 71.5
76.0 30.0 9.0 39.0
82.0 61.5 14.0 75.5
90.0 61.0 16.1 77.1
77.5 39.0 20.0 59.0
68.0 67.0 17.0 84.0
88.0 40.0 13.0 53.0 ---57.0 37.0 10.0 47.0
1036.5 655.5 207.1 862.6
7122197 3:40 PM
' .. ..._\··
\.
tMEETING DATE
OMTS:
PDC:8f7/97
FAHR:
EXEC:
STEER:
· JT.BDS: 8/27/97
DISTRICT NO.
All
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
AGENDA
ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
CONTACT FOR INFORMATION
(Originator)
720, J. Herberg ext. 5086
Division No., Name, and Extension
ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PROJECT, SELECTION OF CONSULTANT FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION
PROGRAM (All Districts): The Joint Agency Coordinating Committee requests approval of a Task Order with
Adler Public Affairs for public information services in support of the Orange County Reclamation (OCR) Project.
Recommended Action(sl:
1. Approve selection of Adler Public Affairs to provide public information services in support of the OCR Project,
in an amount not to exceed $99,796, as approved by the OCR Project Coordinating Committee on July 22,
1997. The Districts' share is $49,598, or fifty percent of the of total fee of $99,796, in accordance with the
Cooperative Agreement for Consulting Services for Orange County Reclamation Project, dated February 26,
1997.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE
Date Notice of Exemption Filed:
Negative Declaration Approved on
Final EIR Approved on _and Notice of Determination filed on _
CURRENT BUDGET/COST
INFORMATION
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $500,000
SOURCE: CORF
Schedule/Line ltems:C. 9
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
INFORMATION
First Year in Budget::
Master Plan Estimate:
Year of First Costs:
THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST
INFORMATION
CURRENT YEAR
BUDGET AMOUNT
(FY 97-98)
$500,000
ORIGINAL BUDGET
TOTAL
N/A
ORIGINAL BID, PO,
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
NA
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO
If YES, state number: _ Permanent Limited Term
Revised 05114/97
H:\WP .OTA \ENG\3730\HERBERG\OCRAIT1 .WPD
DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
February 26, 1997
CURRENT YEAR-
TO-DATE
EXPENDITURES
$0
PREVIOUS BUDGET
CHANGES
NIA
CHANGE ORDERS,
FUNDS PREV.
APPROVED
$0.00
YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET
BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
(Total Budget plus
Transfers)
$500,000 $500,000
BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL
THISAIT PROJECT BUDGET
$0.00 $116,000,000.00
AMOUNT AMENDED
REQUESTED THIS PROJECT
AIT AMOUNT
$49,598.00 $49,598.00
REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE
If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
Page 1 of2
. "'
1~~77
Date
~1
Signature
Assistant General Manager (Or Designee)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA Clistl: I
· 1. Agenda Item Submittal and, Minutes from.~
July 22, 1997 OCR Project Coordinating
Committee Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List)
1. Agenda Item Submittal and minutes from
July 22, 1997 OCR Project Coordinating
Committee Meeting.
I
See attached Agenda Item Submittal and minutes from July 22, 1997 OCR Project Coordinating Committee.
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
A GM-Operations
General Manager
Revised 05/14197
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\3730\HERBERG\OCRAIT1 .WPD
Page 2 of2
AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL
MEETING DATE: July 22, 1997
TO: Joint OCR Project Coordinating
Committee
FROM: Donald F. Mcintyre
William R. Mills Jr.
Budgeted: Yes
Program/Line Item No. 901-4030-600. 70-01
Cost Estimate: $100 ,000
General Counsel Approval: N/ A
Engineers/Feasibility Report Approved: N/ A
CEQA Compliance: N/A
Staff Contact: T. Dawes/M. Tuchman/K. Coates
SUBJECT: OCR PROJECT PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM CONSULTANT
INTERVIEWS
SUMMARY
As requested by the Committee, staff has called all Offerors to make appointments for
interviews.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Select consultant to perform the first phase of the public re·lations work for the OCR
Project, development of the public relations program, and negotiate a fee.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
As requested, each appointment allows for a 20-minute presentation by the Offerer, a
15-minute question-and-answer session, and 10 minutes for the Committee to vacate
the room to allow the next Offerer to set up. The schedule for consultant interviews,
together with each firm's proposed fee, is as follows:
-~[!pointment Time
5:45 p.m.
6:30 p.m.
7:15 p.m.
8:00 p.m.
8:45 p.m.
9:30 p.m.
Offeror
Waters & Faubel
Adler Public Affairs.
Katz & Associates with Ellis/Hart Associates, Inc
Gladstone International
Morrison & Associates
Urban Alternatives
Proeosed Fee
$95,000
$99,796
$113,445
$87, 114
$106,000
$65,878
Evaluation forms and a list of prepared questions are attached for use at the
Committee's discretion.
PRIOR RELEVANT ACTION(S)
Committee approval of RFP submittal on April 22, 1997 and of overall selection process
approach on June 10, 1997.
OCR Project Public Information Program
PREPARED INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
1. What is your availability to work on OCR? Do you have any time conflicts with
other projects 7
2. What kind of experience do you have in preparing a public information campaign
strategy for a project of this magnitude 7
3. What is your strategy to handle media issues? Who do you propose to handle media
inquires?
4. What is your approach for dealing with media crises -any ideas on how to prevent
crisis?
5. Who will write news releases?
6. Who will handle generating the creative Mideas" and write the copy? How will these
be presented to the Board and staff?
7. Who will handle the actual execution/production and media placement of collateral
materials & advertisements?
8. Do you plan to develop a project identity: Would it be the same identity for all
audiences?
9. How do you propose to handle the negative •sewage" image w/public?
10.Who will handle the research?
11 • What is your connection/affiliation with Orange County government/politics 7
12.How would you handle the distance between the Districts' offices and your offices 7
13.What is your strategy for working with two agencies, one Joint Coordinating
Committee and two Boards of Directors?
14.How does your previous experience prepare you to work on OCR?
15.Do you feel there are any constraints with the project budget or with your proposed
fee?
MINUTES OF JOINT ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION (OCR)
PROJECT COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE l\IBETING: COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
July 22, 1997, 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Joint CSDOC/OCWD Cooperative Committee for the proposed Orange County
Regional Water Reclamation (OCR) Project was held in the Boardroom at the OCWD offices on
July 22, 1997, at 5:30 p.m .. All members of the Committee were present: CSDOC Directors
George Brown, Norman Eckenrode, and Peer Swan; OCWD Directors Philip L. Anthony,
Langdon W. Owen, and Irv Pickler, Chairman of the Joint Committee. Staff in attendance were
CSDOC Assistant General Manager Judith A Wilson; and OCWD General Manager William R
Mills Jr., Public Affairs Specialist Katie Coates, and District Secretary Barbara White. Also
present was CSDOC Chairman John Collins.
1. Minutes of July 8, 1997 OCR Committee meeting
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Minutes of the Joint CSDOC/OCWD
OCR Cooperative Committee meeting held July 8, 1997 were approved.
2. Consultant Selection for the OCR Project Public Information Program
Tonight's meeting was held for the purpose of interviewing the six candidates for the OCR Public
Information Program. Mr. Mills distributed a letter from one of the six proposers, Urban
Alternatives, declining the invitation to participate in tonight's interviews while stating that the
firm was not withdrawing from consideration to conduct Phase I of the OCR Public Relations
Program.
Thirty-five minute interviews, consisting of a 20-minute presentation by the Offeror and a
15-minute question and answer session, were then conducted with the other five proposers:
5 :45 p.m. Waters & Faubel, represented by Meg Waters and Roger Faubel
6:30 p.m. Adler Public Affairs, represented by Gary Lawrence, Cheryl Downey, Jeffiey
Adler and Jacki Bacharach
7:15 p.m. Katz & Associates with Ellis/Hart Associates, Inc., represented by Sara Katz,
Laura Wangenheim, Patricia Tennyson, and Peter MacLaggan for Katz; and
by Scott Hart for Ellis/Hart
8:00 p.m .. Gladstone International, represented by Joan Gladstone and fill Kanzler
8:45 p.m. Morrison & Associates, represented by Joanne Rodriguez, Carl Morrison, and
Lisa Ohlund
At the conclusion of the interview program the Directors compared their interview notes,
concurring to short-list to Adler Public Affairs, Katz & Associates, and Morrison & Associates.
These candidates were then ranked by each Director, at which time it was determined that Adler
Public Affairs received the highest overall ranking.
It was moved by Director Brown, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried
unanimously to recommend the firm of Adler Public Affairs to conduct the OCR
Public Information Program.
ADJOURNMENT
The Committee adjourned at 9:50 p.m. The next Joint OCR Committee meeting is scheduled for
Tuesday, July 29, 1997, at 5:30 p.m at the CSDOC Administrative Offices, 10844 Ellis Avenue,
Fountain Valley.
2
~
~
.•
DRAFT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P.O. Box8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
RE STRATEGIC PLAN
TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1997 AT 5 P.M.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Tuesday, March 25, 1997, at 5 p.m.,
at the Districts' Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PRESENT:
George Brown, Comm. Chair
and Chair, FAHR
John Collins, Joint Chair
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair
Shirley Dettloff, Chair, Dist. 11
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS
Sheldon Singer, Chair, PDC
ABSENT:
None
OTHERS PRESENT:
Kellene Bum-Lucht, COM
Toby Weissert, Carollo Engineers
STAFF PRESENT:
Don Mcintyre, General Manager
Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative
Officer
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Michelle Tuchman, Director of
Communications
Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager
Tom Dawes, Planning Manager
Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer
Angie Berdanis, Engineering Aide
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page2
March 25, 1997
RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the December 5, 1996 Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The Committee Chair did not make a report.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
The General Manager did not make a report.
DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-3)
1. STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE:
David Ludwin introduced Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer, who will be working on planning
issues after Tom Dawes' retirement.
Phase I:
Project 1: Tom updated the Committee on the status of Phase 1 's Project 1, Investigation and
Repair of the Ocean Outfall. As previously reported, the investigation is on track, however,
problems have been encountered with the repair portion because of difficulty obtaining diving
services. The low bidder the second time around, has had problems getting the required
insurance. The second low bidder indicated that they had the same insurance company and
would have the same problem. The third bidder's fee was very high. General Counsel is
working to resolve the problem. If it can't be resolved, re-bidding may be required.
Projects 2 and 3: The consultant and staff updated the Ad Hoc Committee members on the
status of Projects 2 and 3. The activities of the PAC and RAC were reviewed. She also
discussed preliminary results from interviews and surveys. The proposed category structure
and rate changes have been introduced. Director Swan suggested having four categories for
residential connections.
The staff expressed concern about their ability to complete the review of the base data in
time for the next scheduled RAC meeting on April 3. The Directors agreed to delay that
meeting by at least two weeks, to a date to be determined.
Phase II: Treatment, Reuse and Disposal Facilities
Dave Ludwin reported that COM is the consultant for this Phase. A kick-off meeting is
scheduled for April 9.
. ..,
v
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page 3
March 25, 1997
Director Swan expressed concern that using the 78-inch outfall has been eliminated as an
alternative. Staff said that it was still on the list, that nothing had been eliminated yet. The
Regional Board will be contacted to discuss the use of this outfall in more detail.
Phase Ill: Preparation of Programmatic Environmental Impact Report:
Proposals have been evaluated and staffs recommendation to enter an agreement with
ESA is going to the PDC in April with work scheduled to start in May.
Water Conservation: Meetings are continuing and a plan is in development, which will be
presented in April. Some of the pitfalls of other conservation programs were discussed.
Director Swan indicated that I RWD experience has shown that there is a better return by
replacing shower heads than low flow toilets. The biggest savings of all can be realized by
changing the way cities and water districts charge for water, using block rate allocations.
Water Reclamation: There is a meeting of the joint agencies immediately following this
meeting. There are still several major issues that need to be addressed, including how to
proceed, defining the scope of work for a public relations firm for Phase 1 only, and how the
project will be governed.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY
There was no other business discussed.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting has not been scheduled.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:28 p.m.
Submitted by:
\.
H:\WP.DTA\AOMIN\GM\ADHOC-97\STRATPLN\MAR\MINUTES.MST
~1
l
DRAFT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
RE STRATEGIC PLAN
June 18, 1997 at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, June 18, 1997, at 5:30
p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PRESENT:
George Brown, Comm. Chair
and Chair, FAHR
John Collins, Joint Chair
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair
Shirley Dettloff, Chair, Dist. 11
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS
ABSENT:
Burnie Dunlap, Chair, PDC
Blake Anderson, COO
OTHERS PRESENT:
Kellene Bum-Lucht, COM
Tom Dawes, OCR Planning Manager
STAFF PRESENT:
Don Mcintyre, General Manager
Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Jim Herberg, Planning Supervisor
Angie Berdanis, Engineering Associate
Corina Chaudhry, Committee Secretary pro tern
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM, IF NECESSARY
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the March 25, 1997 Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page2
June 18, 1997
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
There was no report by the Committee Chair.
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
Don reported on a meeting at the City of Huntington Beach at which they had asked the Districts for
assistance in the replacement of their sewer lines. Don said that we could not assist them on this
project. The long-term costs would be about $140 million, and the short-term costs would be about
$7 million. Don mentioned that these type of requests may happen more in the future as older cities
face up to these type of liabilities and as EPA puts more pressure for all cities to be accountable for
maintenance of their sewer systems. Discussion followed on the need for a Districts-wide
cooperative effort to move toward a more uniform or standardized system for maintenance repair.
John Collins said that if we received a letter from the City of Huntington Beach, that he wanted to
see it.
Don mentioned that Blake would not be attending the meeting tonight.
DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-4)
1. Strategic Plan Status and Schedule (Dave Ludwin)
•
Dave Ludwin discussed some of the details regarding the peak flow and hydraulic management
issues. Dave mentioned that the meeting tonight was not a presentation, but rather an open
discussion.
Handouts were provided and Dave discussed the handout information. Dave mentioned that
relative to the treatment -Phase 2 of the work, COM would also be doing that portion of the
work. He said that began back in April of this year. Dave mentioned the kick-off meeting that
took place between staff and the consultants. Dave said that COM was in the process of
gathering data and information and interviewing staff.
Dave reported that we would be looking at a variety of issues. He said that we were going to
take a look at power generation and the demands of the plants, and would be discussing the
Cen Gen facilities and how we propose to utilize them in consideration of the upcoming
deregulations. Dave mentioned that COM would be looking at how the Districts generate power
and its future uses.
Biosolids and alternative disposal options were discussed. Dave said that COM would be
working with Mike Moore and T.S. staff on these issues and strategies for the future.
Dave reported that the CEQA consultant from Environmental Sciences Associates (ESA), was
now involved in the project, and was attending the coordination meetings with COM staff. Dave
reported that this was important in order to ensure that there wouldn't be any fatal flaws relative
to ocean discharge requirements. Dave said that Kelli Bum-Lucht would be discussing this in
more detail later on in her presentation.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page3
June 18, 1997
Dave mentioned the 25 different alternatives that were brought up at the March meeting. Dave
reported that Kelli and her staff were working to get those alternatives down to a reasonable
number.
Dave reported on the collection system deficiencies and the fact that the Districts had obtained a
lot of information from the databases and that we had also built a hydraulic model of our
collection system. Dave said that we had identified some of the deficiencies in the existing
system and had taken this forward to the year 2020. Dave said that the wet weather flow
information that we gathered last winter was limited because we didn't have many large storms.
He said that we would continue to do more monitoring next winter to help us gather more data.
General Discussion by all Attendees
Kelli reported that we are 90% complete on the interim flow management plan, which gives us a
plan for immediate implementation for this next rain event. Kelli said that this plan delineates
step by step what the operator should do to minimize or eliminate any flows that may go to the
78 inch outfall or the Santa Ana River.
Peer Swan asked about the 78 inch outfall and about its use in emergencies since the pumps
hadn't run for at least 20 years. Jim Herberg said that the system was periodically tested and
that OOBS pumps could be used for this purpose.
The connection fee alternatives were discussed as well as methods for determining rates that
might provide economic relief to industries and commercial entities.
The agenda for the June 19 RAC #6 meeting was briefly discussed. It was mentioned that the
RAC would be finalizing some of their recommendations for rate structure in October of this year
and that there would be a quarterly Board workshop in November. It was expected to go to
FAHR in the spring.
Judy Wilson reported that we would be going to market maybe in June to issue debt to
implement the plan later in the year assuming that it's adopted in December. Judy said that
basically we would be going to the rating agencies for rating appraisal in the fall after we knew
what our reserves policies were and that we would go back to FAHR after going through the
user fee structure. Judy said that first we needed to know our rate structure.
Peer suggested that we shouldn't go to the rating agencies this year if we were not going to
issue until next year.
The debt issuance and the practice of paying for things out of the capital account and their
recovery by future bond issues was discussed.
Dave mentioned that the PAC would finalize recommendations for treatment and peak flow
management in January 1998. He said that the OCR Draft EIR/EIS would go to the public in
March 1998, and the Strategic Plan Draft EIR would go to the public in May 1998. Tom Dawes
said that the OCR project is moving at an accelerated pace and that two OCR Projects would go
to the PDC in September.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page4
June 18, 1997
Dave mentioned that an additional Workshop for the RAC had been added because of the
model work.
2. Ocean Outfall Investigation (Jim Herberg)
Jim Herberg reported on the outfall investigation that is underway and discussed the three
items. He said that the first two items were complete; structural strength testing and the
hydraulic testing. He reported that the investigation and minor repairs was just now beginning
and that this would be complete in September.
Jim discussed the hydraulic testing which was completed in December of 1996. He said that the
main purpose was to determine pipe friction losses and to identify possible hydraulic restrictions.
Jim said that the conclusions from hydraulic testing were as follows:
-Hydraulic friction of outfall pipe had gradually increased over time.
-There were no apparent hydraulic restrictions identified, and
-There was no increase in rated outfall capacity.
Jim discussed the chart that was provided regarding the tide swings. Jim also discussed the
future investigation and minor repairs scheduled for the summer 1997. The future investigation
and minor repairs for the 78 inch outfall are: 1) Clean diffuser ports 2) Close end gate, and 3)
Probe the sand levels. Jim mentioned that we might need a permit to clean out the pipes. For
the 120 inch outfall, they are: 1) Replace end gate restraint, 2) Detailed inspection of manholes
and end gate hinges, 3) Clean diffuser ports, and 4) Sediment profile and samples. Jim said
that if we find any problems, Carollo would prepare a contract to replace the hinge pins. John
Collins said he wasn't comfortable with having Carollo preparing up our contracts.
3. Peak Flow Management (Kelli Bum-Lucht)
Kelli discussed the development of flow management alternatives. Kelli said that each
alternative would contain three basic component building blocks. They are 1) Ways to reduce
the base flow, 2) Ways to provide storage to dampen the flow, and 3) Ways to discharge the
flow through reuse scenario or some modifications to the outfall system.
Kelli said that water conservation measures can reduce baseline wastewater flows and can
possibly reduce the dry weather base flows. Kelli discussed MWDOC 's toilet retrofit program
and the fact that MWDOC had originally had an aggressive schedule for toilet retrofit; about
50, 000 toilets per year, and that it would take them to the year 2015 to retrofit all the toilets as
planned. However, Kelli mentioned that the program had been scaled back and now they would
only be retrofitting about 20,000 toilets per year. She said this would result in about a 13 mgd
reduction by the year 2020. Kelli said that for CDM's study they would be assuming the more
-conservative approach and that in CDM's studies they would be using the 13 mgd number.
Kelli discussed the possible methods for reduction in inflow and the infiltration into the system.
She said that one proposed method would involve using rubber stoppers in manhole cover vent
holes and that this would have to be a cooperative effort by all cities. She said this would
involve about 120,000 to 140,000 manholes and would result in a possible 10-20% reduction of
rain-induced in flow. She said that for infiltration reduction, this would require a localized flow
monitoring program.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Pages
June 18, 1997
Kelli discussed the possibilities for storage of flows until after storm peaks, and she also
discussed the discharge reuse options to handle peak flows from the Plants. The possibilities
are; providing water reclamation, increasing capacity of existing 120 inch outfall through
modifications, constructing a second 120 inch outfall, use of the existing 78 inch outfall, and the
use of the Santa Ana River.
Kelli discussed the spreadsheet data handout "Performance of Flow Management Altemativesn.
Kelli elaborated on the various conditions, and discussed alternatives for exceeding our planned
discharge method. Kelli reported that if we do nothing else today to improve our system, we will
more than likely exceed the limit at least once every seven years.
Kelli said that capital costs and our annual operations & maintenance costs had not yet been
calculated. She said that these costs would be forthcoming.
As an example, she said that with the OCR Project, not doing anything to the outfall, using the
78 inch outfall as a backup, and having 40 mgd of storage, the Districts would probably not ·
exceed the limit once every 19 -20 years.
Kelli asked the AD Hoc Committee if she took this information to the RAC, whether they would
be able to follow the technical information. The Ad Hoc Committee said that the material was
easy to follow and that Kelli had presented it well.
It was suggested that a column be added which included frequency per year, use of 78 inch
outfall.
4. "The Big Picture" (Tom Dawes)
Tom Dawes provided the Committee with an overall "optionsn picture. A process diagram was
handed out and this was discussed in detail. Tom discussed regulatory requirements, level of
treatment; discharge locations, amount of secondary treatment, disinfection alternatives, and the
OCR Project.
Tom discussed ways to manage increased salinity including brine bypass of the Reclamation
Plant.
Tom reported on the possible solutions to reducing wet weather peak flows including the OCR
Project, the reduction of I/I in partnership with agencies served, water conservation, and local
sewer management. Tom said that there were few resources and little incentives for cities to do
anything on their own to reduce Ill.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page6
June 18, 1997
There was no other business discussed.
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting is scheduled for August 13, 1997.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Submitted by:
H:\wp.dta\admin\GMW>HOC-97\STRATPLN\JUNE\061897.MIN
.· .
--.
DRAFT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
MINUTES OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
RE STRATEGIC PLAN
Wednesday, August 13, 1997 at 5:30 p.m.
A meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, August 13, 1997,
at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office.
ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
PRESENT:
George Brown, Comm. Chair and Chair,
FAHR
John Collins, Joint Chair
Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair
Jan Debay, Chair, Dist. 5
Shirley Dettloff, Chair pro tern, Dist. 11
Burnie Dunlap, Chair, PDC
Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS
ABSENT:
None
OTHERS PRESENT:
Kellene Bum-Lucht, COM
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
Tom Dawes, Planning Consultant
STAFF PRESENT:
Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer
Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer
David Ludwin, Director of Engineering
Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications
Jim Herberg, Planning Engineer
Mike Moore, EMC Manager
Angie Berdanis, Engineering Aide
Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM. IF NECESSARY
No appointment was necessary.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments by any member of the public.
RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the June 18, 1997 Ad Hoc Committee meeting were approved as drafted.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page2
August13, 1997
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR
The committee chair did not make a report
REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER
General Manager Don Mcintyre said that this meeting was critical because the data compiled
to date needs to be defined to develop public presentations and to determine the best way to
get the information to the Directors. Several policy decisions are required. Information will
be presented that will help the Committee members provide direction to staff on how to
proceed.
DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-4)
1. Review Outcome of RAC Workshop No. 7. "Develop Recommendations"
Kelli Bum-Lucht, COM consultant, reviewed the results from the July 31 RAC meeting.
The intent of the RAC was to have them review alternatives developed by the
Strategic Plan consultants and then make recommendations on the structure of the
fee schedules in an effort to make them equitable for the three user fee groups-
residential, commercial and industrial.
After seven meetings, the RAC members decided as follows:
USER FEES
Decision
Keep Existing User Charge System
Change Commercial Categories
Should Multi-Family be Proportionate to Single Family
Should Different Cost Allocations be Applied
Constant O&M: Residential Only
Replacement/Improvement: Residential Only
Constant O&M and Replacement/Improvement:
Residential Only
Other Cost Allocation
Vote
Yes No
16 4
20 0
21 1
6 16
5
15
0
1
A summary report will be developed on what the RAC members thought and why they
thought the way they did.
There is an interim RAC workshop, 78, planned for September 11 , and the final
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page 3
August13, 1997
meeting of this group will be October 9 (8?). At the last meeting, there will be a
recognition ceremony for all members.
The connection fee, which is charged to new users of the system, was discussed.
At the next RAC meeting (78), the decisions for the remaining questions on connection
fee methods will be completed. The results of the decisions so far are:
CONNECTION FEES
Decision
Change Existing Connection Fee Method
Tiered Residential Connection Fees
Provide Industrial Incentives
Change Payment Method
Apply Different Cost Allocations
"Buy-in" Costs: Residential Only
"Incremental" Expansion Costs for
Industrial/Commercial
Wet Weather Facilities Method
Vote
Yes No
20 2
20 2
16 5
lll1@11lllllllill!1llllllllllll!llllllllljl!lll1illiilliilllli!·I
General Counsel Tom Woodruff said that Proposition 218 does have an impact on this
process and takes away some of the options previously allowed.
Action Item: At the request of Director Debay, staff will prepare examples of the effect of
changes on the various categories for the next meeting.
2. Review Major Policy Issues for Board Consideration
Blake Anderson outlined the major topics that require policy decisions by the Directors.
These include determining the level of treatment based on permit requirements, OCR
requirements and community expectations; peak flow management; water conservation
efforts; water reclamation; treatment works siting; treatment works automation; biosolids
reuse; rate structure; cooperative programs; public information and Board workshops.
Several of the issues and concerns that related to these topics were reviewed, as well as
the mechanism for informing the Directors.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page4
August13, 1997
The topics and the recommended review committee follow.
Rate Structure FAHR
Automation FAHR and OMTS
Construction Program PDC
Treatment Plan PDCand OMTS
Permit Issues OMTS
Cooperative Projects Steering and Ad Hoc
Public lnvolvement/EIR Process Ad Hoc
The Committee accepted staff's recommendation.
3. Review Logistics That will Support Boards' Decision-making Process
Director of Engineering David Ludwin discussed the protocol for the decision process.
The schedule for the various elements was reviewed, as well as considering the
involvement of the RAC/PAC members in workshops.
Staff asked for direction on holding Saturday workshops for the FAHR Committee and the
other Board members. The Ad Hoc Committee members indicated that they will act as
the screening group. RAC members may be invited to attend a workshop in October.
In January a new group, the PAC2, will be formed to discuss the preferred level of
treatment. This will help prepare staff and the Boards for the EIR process.
The OCR EIR process time line must follow our approval process.
4. Local Agency Cooperative Projects
Don Mcintyre announced that the Los Angeles City Council confirmed the appointment of
Judy Wilson as their new Director of Sanitation and that this would be her last meeting
with the committee.
Judy thanked the members for their support over the past two years. She then gave
some background on the County-wide sewer collection system and the responsibilities of
the Districts. Most of the sewer lines in Orange County are constructed and maintained
by the cities; the Districts have about 3% of all sewer lines. However, in order to handle I
and I, there must be a cooperative program with the cities on how storm water and
ground water I and I is handled.
General Counsel prepared a memorandum dated August 13, 1997 (copy attached) that
outlined funding limitations on such a program, as well as providing a recommendation.
The Health and Safety Code limits the Districts use of user and connection fee proceeds
,,
..
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Pages
August 13, 1997
for the "purchase or construction of new local street sewers or laterals as distinguished
from main trunk, interceptor and outfall sewers". However, there is no prohibition on the
operation and maintenance of local sewers. Therefore, depending on the scope of a
matching funds program with cities, special legislation may or may not be req·uired.
The matching funds program would require that the Diredors determine the overall policy
on how to upgrade the sewer system within the service area. One suggestion was to
provide matching funds to the cities to insure that they maintain and operate their local
systems with "best management" pradices as developed by the Districts, after a study on
the condition of local sewers is completed by the cities.
Tom Dawes said that there were other benefits besides reducing I and I. There would be
reduced costs for operations and maintenance; and with peak flow redudion, less capital
would be necessary. Director Swan agreed and asked Kelli Bum-Lucht if the I and I
problem had been discussed with the cities. Kelli indicated that the cities, for the most
part, don't have a handle on the local situation, and some weren't aware of the issue.
Director Debay suggested we buy the equipment necessary to check the conditions of
local sewers and loan it to the cities. Director Collins suggested sharing the costs
through a sewer equipment rental program.
Blake Anderson said that District 11 is ready to start a cooperative study to try to evaluate
the I and I problem, and they would probably be open to our assistance.
Action Item: Staff will prepare a draft position paper to help formulate this program. It
will be discussed with the cities and the findings will be presented at future Ad Hoc and
Executive Committee meetings.
CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session.
OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY
Director Debay mentioned that a special. public outreach plan be prepared to notify the public
when they should reduce their discharges to the sewer, such as heavy rain storms. This would
include not using clothes washing machines or dishwashers, reducing the flushing of toilets,
keeping storm drain openings clear of debris, and not popping manhole covers to drain standing
water.
Action Item: Staff will begin work on this plan.
Minutes of the Ad Hoc Committee re
the Strategic Plan
Page6
August 13, 1997
MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT
MEETING
There were none.
CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
The next Ad Hoc Committee meeting is tentatively scheduled for the third or fourth week of
October 1997; the exact date and time to be determined.
ADJOURNMENT
The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 7:20 p.m.
Submitted by:
J
H:\wp.c:tta\admin\GM\AOHOC-97\STRATPLN\AUG\081397.min.doc
For Bd. Sec. Use Only
0 COM'.1. INFO. ITEM
0 COM\t ACTION ITEM
0 JT. BDSfcoNSENT '
D JT. BOS. DISCUSSION
(NON-CONSENl)
0 PVB!jCflEARJNG xh 'J/f? .rr. BOS. MEETING DATE ~ JT. BOS.AGENDA ITEM NO.
MEETING DATE
OMTS:
PDC:
FAHR
EXEC:
STEER:
JT.BDS: 08/2.7 /97
EXEC. ___ _
STEER. ___ _
DISTRICT NO.
ALL
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
AGENDA
ITEM
TRANS MITT AL
CONTACT FOR INFORMATION
(Originator)
2210, Gary G. Streed, Ext. 2500
Division No., Name, and Extension
RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 1997 (All Districts)
Recommended Action(s):
1. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of July 1997.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE
Date Notice of Exemption Filed:
Negative Declaration Approved on
Final EIR Approved on _ and Notice of Determination filed on •
CURRENT BUDGET/COST
INFORMATION
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $
SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS
Schedule/Line Items:
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
INFORMATION
First Year in Budget:
Master Plan Estimate:
Year of First Costs:
THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST
INFORMATION
CURRENT YEAR
BUDGET AMOUNT
N/A
ORIGINAL BUDGET
TOTAL
N/A
ORIGINAL BID, PO,
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
N/A
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL 7 NO
If YES, state number: _ Permanent _ Limited Term
Revised 05/14197
H:\WP.DTA\FIN\2210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR.97\SEPT\FAHR97-54 .. DOC
DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
CURRENT YEAR-
TO-OATE
EXPENDITURES
N/A
PREVIOUS BUDGET
CHANGES
N/A
CHANGE ORDERS,
FUNDS PREV.
APPROVED
N/A
YEAR-TO-DATE
BUDGET BALANCE
N/A
BUDGET CHANGE
THIS AIT
N/A
AMOUNT
REQUESTED THIS
AIT
N/A
REVISED BUDGET
TOTAL
(Total Budget plus
Transfers)
N/A
REVISED TOTAL
PROJECT BUDGET
$0.00
AMENDED
PROJECT
AMOUNT
$0.00
REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE
If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
Page 1 of2
ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List):
14--3\UC:: 'ir
Date
1. Monthly Investment Reports.
2. Monthly Transaction Report.
ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List)
CONCURRENCES: 1. Monthly Investment Reports.
2. Monthly Transaction Report.
Date
Oi ( t/J ~7
r: Date
ltment He d Or Designee)
~U-'~ Sign a Date
Assistant General Manager (Or Designee)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO}, has served as the Districts' professional external money manager, and Mellon
Trust as the Districts' third-party custodian, since September 1995.
The Districts' Investment Policy, adopted by the Joint Boards, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most
column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies." All
of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with.
Historical cost and the current market ("mark-to-market"} values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The
slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date.
The Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code.
In addition, sufficient funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months.
The table below details the book balances of the Districts' funds at month-end.
State of Calif. LAIF
Union Bank Checking Account
Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement
Bank of America Checking Account
Bank of America Money Market Account
Bank of America Overnight Repurchase Agreement
PIMCO -Short-term Portfolio
PIMCO -Long-term Portfolio
District 11 GO Bond Fund 921
Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees
Petty Cash
Deferred Compensation
TOTAL
$ 19,998,921 5.6
88,144 5.1
1,937,000 5.1
78,062 4.5
12,679 4.1
-0-
17, 075, 097 5.4
289,141,121 5.9
4,230 5.5
33, 112,905 6.2
4,400
11.062 796 (1.21) -27.25
$372 515355
Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition, a
consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of July 1997 is attached. Drawdowns from the
Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio totaling $30 million were transacted in July to meet semi-annual debt service payment
requirements, and other cash flow needs. The new yield analysis report is presented again this month as a monitoring and
reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for indMdual
holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the Districts' custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions
that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected.
GGS:lc
Revised 05/14197
\\LEAD\DATA2\WP.DTA\FIN\2210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR.97\SEPT\FAHR97.54
Page2of2
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 July 1997)
Liquid Operating Monies .
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• ti~~~ •
Historical Cost: • PIMCO
• Mellon
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio:
Of Index:
15.1.3 1%INTERESTRATECHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1 % Change:
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule)
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days:
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A":
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return(%):
1 Month:
3 Months:
12 Months:
Year-to-Date:
Index Total Rate of Return(%):
1 Month:
H: l.. \FINANCE\221 O\KOZAK\LIQ0797.RPT
• f ,,
$17,207,579
$17,208,143
$17,207,579
$17,210,011
0.17
0.25 ..
$29,253 (0.17%)
0%
85%
"AAA"
0%
0.47
1.38
5.52
3.22
0.43
MONTHLY REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
(for the month ending 31 July 1997)
Long Term Operating Monies
15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate:
• a~~~ •
Historical Cost:
• PIMCO
• Mellon
15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio:
Of Index:
15.1.3 1%INTERESTRATECHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss) of 1 % Change:
15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS % of Portfolio in Reverse Repos:
(see attached schedule)
15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days:
15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality:
15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING % of Portfolio Below "A":
15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance"
15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return:(%)
1 Month:
3 Months:
12 Months:
Year-to-Date:
Index Total Rate of Return: (%)
1 Month:
H:\... \FJNANCE\22 I O\KOZAK\L-T0797.RPT
~295,595, 772 295,333,338
$294,016,102
$293,911,655
2.03
2.30
$6,000,594
0%
NA
''AAA''
0%
1.56
3.19
8.73
4.77
1.47
OCSF075111
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO MELLON TRUST PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR
31-JUL-1997
BASE: USO
HBllOO
% OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 0.82 0.82 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER -DISCOUNT 2,073,477.59 2,073,477.59 12.05% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 2,374,706.67 2,374,706.67 13.80% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES -LESS THN lYR 2,748,380.44 2,748,380.44 15.97% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK -LESS THN lYR 3,341,489.09 3,341,489.09 19.42% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK -LES 2,960,326.67 2,960,326.67 17 .20% 0.00 0.00 0.00
BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 175,662.00 175,662.00 1.02% 0.00 6,587.33 3.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 13,674,043.28 13,674,043.28 79.46% 0.00 6, 587. 33 0.05
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,402,921.88 3,401,054.00 19.76% -1,867.88 195,500.00 5.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3 '402 '921. 88 3,401,054.00 19.76% -1,867.88 195,500.00 5.75
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS
PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 133 ,046.00 133 ,046.00 0.77% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 133 '046. 00 133 ,046.00 0.77% 0.00 0.00 0.00
================== ================== ======== ================= ================ ======= NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 17' 210' 011.16 17,208,143.28 100.00% -1,867.88 202,087.33 1.17
-----------·----------------------------------------
Page 1
OCSF075222 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
MELLON TRUST PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR 31-JUL-1997 BASE: USO HBllOO
% OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR
PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH 0.15 0.15 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00
PAYABLES -44,997,430.52 -44,997,430.52 -15.24% 0.00 0.00 0.00
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT -DOME 9,995,220.00 10,009,329.40 3.39% 14,109.40 595,000.00 5.94
COMMERCIAL PAPER -DISCOUNT 9, 591,652. 33 9,591,652.33 3.25% 0.00 0.00 0.00
FED HM LOAN BNK -LESS THN lYR 1,785,796.00 1,785,796.00 0.60% 0.00 0.00 0.00
BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 56,364.00 56,364.00 0.02% 0.00 2,113.65 3.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS -23,568,398.04 -23,554,288.64 -7.98% 14,109.40 597,113.65 -2.54
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
U.S. GOVERNMENTS 145,449,419.24 146,964,130.00 49.76% 1,514,710.76 10,151,250.00 6.91
U.S. AGENCIES 126,777,718.50 127, 100, 671. 00 43.04% 322,952.50 8,250,390.00 6.49
BANKING & FINANCE 27,553,599.00 27,517,364.00 9.32% -36,235.00 1,848,315.00 6.72
INDUSTRIAL 11,507,100.00 11,113,245.00 3.76% -393,855.00 988,500.00 8.89 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 311,287,836.74 312,695,410.00 105 .88% 1,407,573.26 21,238,455.00 6.79
OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 6,192,216.54 6,192,216.54 PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 2.10% 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 6,192,216.54 6,192,216.54 2.10% 0.00 0.00 0.00
================== ================== ======== ================= ================ ======= NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 293,911,655.24 295,333,337.90 100.00% 1,421,682.66 21,835,568.65 7.39
Page 1
_, •.,l
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1
OCSF07511102 1997/07/31 RUN DATE 08/06/97
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TI"E 10.41.52 ================================c============================================================================================
PAR VALUE VTlt AT CURRENT QUALITY tlARKET TOTAL COST/ 1. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE tlARKET VALUE 1. TOTAL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
175,662.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-.ooo 3.750 100.000 175,662.00 1.28
999495906 PUBLIC II 175,662.00 1.03
700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN ffTG CORP DISC 5.398 .ooo P-1 99.478 696,345.42 5.09
313397KT7 HAT 08/22/1997 696,345.42 4.08
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN ffTG CORP DISC 5.478 .ooo P-1 98.946 2,374,706.67 17.36
313397LG4 HAT 09/04/1997 2,374,706.67 13.91
3,000,000.00 FED FARff CR BK CONS DISC MTS 5.483 .ooo P-1 98.678 2,960,326.67 21.64
313313"81 tlAT 09/23/1997 2,960,326.67 17.34
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 5.500 .ooo P-1 98.185 294,555.00 2.15
313385NY8 tlAT 11/7/1997 294,555.00 1.73
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 5.524 .ooo P-1 97.941 2,350,588.67 17.19
313385PJ9 tlAT 11/17/1997 2,350,588.67 13.77
800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.542 .ooo NR 99.070 792,558.00 5.79
36959HWH6 09/17/1997 792,558.00 4.64
2,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL ffTG ASSN DISC MTS 5.542 .ooo P-1 98.156 2,748,380.44 20.09
313589NE9 "AT 10/20/1997 2,748,380.44 16.10
500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 5.590 .ooo P-1 98.577 492,882.92 3.60
02S81RXF5 10/15/1997 492,882.92 2.89
800,000.00 FORD ffTR CR CO DISC 5.634 .ooo NR 98.505 788,036.67 5.76
34539TX83 10/08/1997 788,036.67 4.62
-----------------------------------------TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.364 .088 13,674,042.46 100.00
13.,674.,042.46 80.11
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
3,400.,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.340 5.748 AAA 100.031 3.,402.,921.88 100.00
912827V33 05.7501. 09/$0/1997 DD 10/02195 3.,401.,054.00 19.92
YLDANAL
OCSF07511102
ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING
YIELD ANALYSIS
1997/07/31
PAGE
RUN DATE
RUN TIME
2
08/06/97
10.41.52 ============================================================================================================================= I
PAR VALUE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION
----------------------------------------------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
TOTAL
YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET
BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE
5.340 5.748
5.363 .336
TOTAL COST/
MARKET VALUE
3,,402,,921.88
3,,401,,054.00
17,,076,,964.34
17,,075,,096.46 =================
Y. TYPE
Y. TOTAL
100.00
19.92
100.00
100.00 =========
_,
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3
OCSF07522202 1997/07/31 RUN DATE 08/06197
ORANGE CTY-LONS TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 10.41.52
================================c=~==========================================================================================
PAR VALUE Yl1t AT CURRENT QUALITY "ARK ET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
-----------------------------·-----------------------------·--------·------------------------------
CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
56,364.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-.ooo 3.750 100.000 56,364.00 .26
999495906 PUBLIC II 56,364.00 .02
1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 5.403 .ooo P-1 99.211 1,785,796.00 8.32
313385LH7 HAT 09/05/1997 1,785,796.00 .53
4,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 5.576 .ooo P-1 98.988 4,256,484.00 19.85
02581RWC3 09/12/1997 4,256,484.00 1.27
2,400,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 5.581 .ooo P-1 99.078 2,377,880.00 11.08
02680JVN8 08/2211997 2,377,880.00 .71
l,soo,000.00 DU PONT DE NEttOUR DISC 5.585 .ooo P-1 98.472 1,477,083.33 6.88
26354AXF6 10/15/1997 1,477,083.33 .44
900,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC 5.618 .ooo P-1 98.797 8891 177.50 4.14
72447GWJ9 09/18/1997 889,177.50 .27
600,000.00 FORD HTR CR CO DISC 5.634 .ooo NR 98.505 591,027.50 2.75
34539TX83 10/08/1997 591,027.50 .18
10,000,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 6.000 5.944 100.093 9,995,220.00 46.67
0663JOKU7 05.9507. 06/19/1998 DD 06/19/97 10,009,329.40 3.00
-----------------------------------------TOTAL CASH &.CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.574 .872 21,429,032.33 100.00
21,443,141.73 6.42
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
4,000,000.00 FORD HTR CR HTN TRANCHE •TR 96 .ooo 6.309 Al 100.329 3,970,480.00 1.28
345402DZ1 FLTS/RT 11/09/1998 DD 11/08/93 4,013,160.00 1.20
1,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR HTN TR I 00177 .ooo 5.872 Al 99.796 6,999,748.00 2.26
3454021U3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DD 03/30/94 7,085,516.00 2.12
24,ooo,ooo.oo U S TREASURY NOTES 6.015 6.282 AAA 101.484 24,216,237.92 7.78
9128272T8 06.3757. 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 24,356,160.00 7.29
35,ooo,ooo.oo U S TREASURY NOTES 6.044 6.727 AAA 102.203 35,583,789.06 11.43
912827R20 06.8757. 08/,1/1999 DD 08/31/94 35,111,050.00 10.71
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4
OCSF07522202 1997/07/31 RUN DATE 08/06/97
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERH OPERATING RUN TIME 10.41.52 =============================================================================================================================
PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
----------------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------
11,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.147 6.345 AAA 102.437 11,159,843.75 3.60
9128272"1 06.5007. 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 11,268,070.00 3.37
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HTG ASSN MTN 6.291 6.177 AAA 100.859 4,488,705.00 1.45
31364CXV5 6.2307. 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 4,538,655.00 1.36
39,600,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DDS 6.305 6.497 AAA 99.891 39,890,500.00 12.65
313391586 6.4907. 09/13/2000 DD 09/13/95 39,556,836.00 11.84
1,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN I TR 00491 6.305 7.619 A2 100.934 1,031,860.00 .32
81238XUJ8 7.6907. 02/27/1998 DD 02/28/95 1,009,340.00 .30
4,500,000.00 CATERPILLAR FINL MTNS TR00389 6.322 5.799 A2 99.665 4,466,745.00 1.43
14912LSE2 8.7807. 07/15/1998 DD 12/15/95 4,484,925.00 1.34
34,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.391 7.431 AAA 104.297 35,102,165.70 11.34
912827S29 07.7507. 11/30/1999 DD 11/30/94 35,460,980.00 10.61
18,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.479 7.422 AAA 104.422 19,065,117.19 6.17
912827$45 07.7507. 12/31/1999 DD 01/03/95 19,318,070.00 5.78
1,000,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR I 00335 6.514 6.242 A3 100.282 993,160.00 .32
17120QPY1 6.2607. 07/20/1998 DD 07/18/95 1,002,820.00 .30
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.516 6.267 AAA 101.719 4,975,781.25 1.62
912827)(49 06.3757. 03/31/2001 DD 04/10/96 5,085,950.00 1.52
3,100,000.00 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP MTN TR00324 6.532 8.094 A3 103.477 3,911,640.00 1.22
37042RPH8 8.3757. 02103/1999 DD 0/03/95 3,828,649.00 1.15
5,000,000.00 FEDERAL HAOKE LN BK CONS DDS 6.550 6.546 AAA 100.060 5,000,000.00 1.59
3133HOFB2 6.5507. 05/24/1999 DD 05/23/97 5,003,000.00 1.50
5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.553 6.627 AAA 101.859 S,019,140.62 1.62
912827Q47 06.7507. 06/30/1999 DD 06/30/94 5,092,950.00 1.52
a,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HTG ASSN MTN 6.577 6.493 AAA 102.031 8,012,576.oo 2.61
31364CBD9 6.6257. 04/18/2001 DD 04/18/96 8,162,480.00 2.44
2,900,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR I 00306 6.591 7.205 A3 100.906 2,952,896.00 .93
17120QNT4 7.2707. 04/13/1998 DD 04/13/95 2,926,274.00 .88
9,000,000.00 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 6.593 8.660 A2 106.810 9,903,780.00 3.07
718154882 9.2507. 02115/2000 9,612,900.00 2.88
YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5
OCSF07S22202 1997/07/31 RUN DATE 08/06197
ORANGE CTY-LONG TERM OPERATING RUN TIHE 10.41.S2 ================================z=c==========================================================================================
PAR VALUE YTll AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE
SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 7. TOTAL
-------------------------------~-----------------------------------------------------------------
20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLHC 6.619 6.920 AAA 101.1S6 20,237,SOO.OO 6.46
999ABJ818 7.0007. 08/15/2002 20,231,200.00 6.05
10,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL HTG ASSN MTN 6.636 5.749 AM 98.109 9,593,750.00 3.13
31364BWF3 S.6401. 02/20/2001 DD 02/20/96 9,810,900.00 2.94
3,000,000.00 G M A C MED TERM NTS 6.660 8.171 A3 105.SS6 3,221,010.00 1.01
37042RKQ4 8.62.57. 1/10/2000 DD 1/10/95 3,166,680.00 .95
1s,ooo,ooo.oo FEDERAL HOME LN HTG CORP DEBS 6.713 6.090 MA 98.3S9 14,SS4,687.SO 4.71
3134AOWW8 S.9907. 03/06/2001 DD 03/06/96 14,7S3,8SO.OO 4.42
2s,ooo,ooo.oo FEDERAL HOME LN ttTG DEB 6.720 6.708 MA 100.175 2.5,000,000.00 8.00
3134AOKQ2 6.7207. 10/02/2000 DD 10/02/95 2.5,043,7SO.OO 7.50
10,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.756 7.304 AAA 106.109 10,327,343.75 3.39
912827ZX3 07.7.607. 02115/2001 DD 02/lS/91 10,610,900.00 3.18
1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER CORP DEBS 8.28S 10.398 A3 100.023 1,603,320.00 .47
171196AN8 10.4007. 08/01/1999 DD 08/01/87 1,500,345.00 .45
-----------------------------------------TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES S.908 6.710 311,287,836.74 100.00
312,695,410.00 93.60
-----------------------------------------TOTAL 5.903 6.623 332,716,869.07 100.00
334,138,SSl.73 100.00 ================= =========
MELLON TRUST OCSG000100
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS
U.S. DOLLAR DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DIST TO PLAN ADMIN 18-JUL-1997
NA9123459 -----------
CW -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 DIST TO PLAN ADMIN 31-JUL-1997
NA9123459 -----------
CW -----------
U.S. DOLLAR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 WIRE TO UNION BANK OF CALI 18-JUL-1997
NA9123459 FOR ADMIN FEE -----------
CW -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 TO REVERSE 18-JUL-1997
NA9123459 -----------
CWC -----------
U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 01-JUL-1997
313589JN4 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS -----------
CW MAT 07/24/1997 -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
0.00 FED WIRE FEE 24-JUL-1997
912827Z39 U S TREASURY NOTES -----------
CW 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEE 24-JUL-1997
912827Z39 U S TREASURY NOTES -----------
CW 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 -----------
PURCHASES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 08-JUL-1997
02581RWC3 09/12/1997 08-JUL-1997
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/
GAIN LOSS
-10,000,000.00
-10,000,000.00
0.00
-20,000,000.00
-20,000,000.00 0.00
-10,000,000.00 -10,000,000.00
0.00
10,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
0.00
-3.00
-3.00
0.00
-3.00
-3.00
0.00
-3.00
-3.00
0.00
-4,256,484.00
4,256,484.00
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS
-10,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-20,000,000.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
-10,000,000.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
10,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-3.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
-3.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
-4,256,484.00
4,256,484.00
•)
BASE: USO
TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000
1.000000000
0.000000 0.000000
1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000
1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000
1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000
1.000000000
98.988000
98.9~8000
---------------------------------------------------------~--------------------
Page 1
OCSG000100 CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
MELLON TRUST
POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
EFFECTIVE DATE/ SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/
GAIN LOSS
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS
BASE: USO TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------B MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES -FIX -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 08-JUL-1997
02581RWC3 09/12/1997 08-JUL-1997 FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 08-JUL-1997
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 14-JUL-1997
02581RXF5 10/15/1997 14-JUL-1997
B CHEMICAL BK COMMERCIAL PAPER/I -----------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 14-JUL-1997
02581RXF5 10/15/1997 14-JUL-1997 FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 14-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC
26354AXF6 10/15/1997 B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC
26354AXF6 10/15/1997 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC
313385LH7 MAT 09/05/1997 B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,800,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC
313385LH7 MAT 09/05/1997
FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY
LIQUID OP~R-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC
313385NY8 MAT 11/7/1997 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY
07-JUL-1997
07-JUL-1997
07-JUL-1997
07-JUL-1997 07-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997 14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
09-JUL-1997
09-JUL-1997
Page 2
0.00
-4,256,484.00 -4,256,484.00
0.00
-492,882.92
492,882.92
0.00
-492,882.92
-492,882.92 0.00
-1,477,083.33
1,477,083.33 0.00
-1,477,083.33
-1,477,083.33 0.00
-1,785,796.00
1,785,796.00
0.00
-1,785,796.00 -1,785,796.00
0.00
-294,555.00
294,555.00 0.00
0.00 1.000000000
0.00
-4,256,484.00 98.988000
0.00 98.988000 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
-492,882.92 98.576584 492,882.92 98.576584
0.00 1.000000000
0.00
-492,882.92 98.576584 0.00 98.576584
0.00 1.000000000
0.00
-1,477,083.33 98.472222 1,477 ,083. 33 98.472222
0.00 1.000000000
0.00
-1,477,083.33 98.472222 0.00 98.472222
0.00 1.000000000 0.00
-1,785,796.00 99.210889 1,785,796.00 99. 210889
0.00 1.000000000 0.00
-1,785,796.00 99.210889
0.00 99.210889 0.00 . 1.000000000
0.00
-294,555.00 98.185000 294,555.00 98.185000
0.00 1.000000000
0.00
·--·~~--~-
MELLON TRUST OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS
313385NY8 MAT 11/7/1997
FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS
313385PJ9 MAT 11/17/1997 B MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS
313385PJ9 MAT 11/17/1997
FC MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
DISC
DISC
INC
DISC
INC
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
09-JUL-1997
09-JUL-1997 09-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997 -----------
03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997
700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 18-JUL-1997 313397KT7 MAT 08/22/1997 18-JUL-1997
B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY -----------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 18-JUL-1997 313397KT7 MAT 08/22/1997 18-JUL-1997 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 18-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 23-JUL-1997 34539TUX1 07/31/1997 23-JUL-1997 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 23-JUL-1997
34539TUX1 07/31/1997 23-JUL-1997
FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 23-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-JUL-1997
34539TX83 10/08/1997 03-JUL-1997
B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-J·UL-1997
34539TX83 10/08/1997 03-JUL-1997
-----------· ·-----
Page 3
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/ GAIN LOSS
-294,555.00
-294,555.00
0.00
-2,350,588.67
2,350,588.67
0.00
-2,350,588.67
-2,350,588.67
0.00
-696,345.42 696,345.42
0.00
-696,345.42 -696,345.42
0.00
-99,878.89 99,878.89
0.00
-99,878.89 -99,878.89
0.00
-591,027.50
591,027.50 o.oo'
-591,027.50
-591,027.50
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS
-294,555.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-2,350,588.67
2,350,588.67
0.00
0.00
-2,350,588.67
0.00
0.00 0.00
-696,345.42 696,345.42
0.00 0.00
-696,345.42 0.00
0.00
0.00
-99,878.89 99,878.89
0.00
0.00
-99,878.89 0.00
0.00
0.00
-591,027.50
591,027.50
0.00
0.00
-591,027.50
0.00
-~~------~ -----~--·
'"#) ...
BASE: USO TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/
98.185000 98.185000
1.000000000
97.941195
97.941195
1.000000000
97.941195
97.941195 1.000000000
99.477917
99.477917
1.000000000
99.477917
99.477917
1.000000000
99.878890 99.878890
1.000000000
99.878890
99.878890
1.000000000
98.504583
98.504583 1.000000000
98.504583
98.504583
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE --------------------------------------------------------------FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 03-JUL-1997
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-JUL-1997
34S39TX83 10/08/1997 03-JUL-1997
B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA -----------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC
34S39TX83 10/08/1997
FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK
03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 18-JUL-1997
369S9HWH6 09/17/1997 18-JUL-1997
B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA -----------
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC
369S9HWH6 09/17/1997 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC
72447GWJ9 09/18/1997 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
900,000.00 PITNEY BOWES CC DISC
72447GWJ9 09/18/1997 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
18-JUL-1997
18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997
01-JUL-1997
02-JUL-1997
01-JUL-1997
02-JUL-1997 02-JUL-1997
108,818.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-01-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 01-JUL-1997 B 01-JUL-1997
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,441.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-01-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 01-JUL-1997 B 01-JUL-1997
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/
GAIN LOSS ------------------0.00
-788,036.67
788,036.67
0.00
-788,036.67 -788,036.67
0.00
-792,558.00
792,S58.00
0.00
-792,SS8.00
-792,558.00
0.00
-889,177.50
889,177.50
0.00
-889,177.SO
-889' 177. so 0.00
-108,818.00
108,818.00
0.00
-300' 441. 00
300,441.00
0.00
Page 4
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS --------------------0.00
0.00
-788,036.67
788,036.67
0.00
0.00
-788,036.67 0.00
0.00
0.00
-792,S58.00 792,558.00
0.00
0.00
-792,558.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
-889,177.SO
889, 177. so
0.00
0.00
-889,177.50
0.00 0.00
0.00
-108,818.00
108,818.00
0.00
0.00
-300' 441. 00
300,441.00
0.00 0.00
BASE: USO TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/ ------------------1.000000000
98.S04S84
98.504584 1.000000000
98.504584
98.S04S84
1.000000000
99.069750 99.0697SO
1.000000000
99.069750 99.069750
1.000000000
98.797SOO 98.797SOO
1.000000000
98.797SOO
98.797500
1.000000000
1.000000
1.000000 1.000000000
1.000000 1.000000
1.000000000
4
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST ..; ,, ,._'
CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE BASE: USO 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997 TMlOO
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/
BASE AMOUNT/
LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COM PL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
22,916.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-07-JUL-1997 -22,916.00 -22,916.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 07-JUL-1997 22,916.00 22,916.00 1.000000
B 07-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,516.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-08-JUL-1997 -43,516.00 -43,516.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 08-JUL-1997 43,516.00 43,516.00 1.000000 B 08-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
7,117.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-14-JUL-1997 -7,117.00 -7,117.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 14-JUL-1997 7,117.00 7,117.00 1.000000
B 14-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
2,793.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-16-JUL-1997 -2,793.00 -2,793.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 16-JUL-1997 2,793.00 2,793.00 1.000000 B 16-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
10,783.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-18-JUL-1997 -10,783.00 -10,783.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 18-JUL-1997 10,783.00 10,783.00 1.000000 B 18-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
313.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-21-JUL-1997 -313.00 -313 .00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 21-JUL-1997 313.00 313. 00 1.000000 B 21-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
23,166.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-23-JUL-1997 -23,166.00 -23,166.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 23-JUL-1997 23,166.00 23,166.00 1.000000
B 23-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-JUL-1997 -4,488,705.00 -4,488,705.00 99.749000 31364CXV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 16-JUL-1997 4,488,705.00 4,488,705.00 99.749000 B CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NY -----------0.00 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-JUL-1997 -103,573.75 -103,573.75 99.749000
·--~----~ --
Page 5
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
31364CXV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 16-JUL-1997
IB -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 14-JUL-1997
31364CXV5 6.230% 03/01/2002 DD 03/03/97 16-JUL-1997
FC CHASE MANHATTAN BANK N A, NY 16-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
912827S29 07.750% 11/30/1999 DD 11/30/94 23-JUL-1997
B SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997 912827S29 07.750% 11/30/1999 DD 11/30/94 23-JUL-1997
IB -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
8,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
912827529 07.750% 11/30/1999 DD 11/30/94 23-JUL-1997
FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 23-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
33,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997
9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997
FC LEHMAN BROS INC 31-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997
9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 29-AUG-1997
B LEHMAN BROS INC -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997
9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 29-AUG-1997
IB -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
9128272Wl 06.500% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 23-JUL-1997
B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY -----------
Page 6
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/
GAIN LOSS
0.00 0.00
-4,592,278.75
-4,592,278.75
0.00
-8,308,750.00
8,308,750.00
0.00
-89,781.42 0.00
0.00
-8' 398' 531. 42 -8' 398' 531. 42 0.00
-33,621,290.82
-33,621,290.82
0.00
-24,319,224.00
24,319,224.00 0.00
-440,706.52
0.00
0.00
-11,159,843.75
11,159,843.75
0.00
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS
0.00
0.00
0.00
-4,592,278.75
0.00 0.00
0.00
-8,308,750.00 8,308,750.00
0.00
0.00
-89' 781. 42
0.00
0.00 0.00
-8' 398' 531. 42 0.00
0.00 0.00
-33,621,290.82
0.00
0.00 0.00
-24,319,224.00
24,319,224.00
0.00
0.00
-440,706.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
-11,159,843.75
11,159,843.75 0.00 0.00
---·-------------------
BASE: USO TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/
99.749000
1.000000000
99.749000
99.749000
1.000000000
103.859375
103.859375
1.000000000
103.859375
103.859375
1.000000000
103.859375
103.859375
1.000000000
100.548800
100.548800 1.000000000
101. 330100
101.330100
1.000000000
101. 330100
101.330100
1.000000000
101.453125
101.453125 1.000000000
"'
OCSG000100
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/ COMPL DATE
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
111 000 1 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
9128272Wl 06.500% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 23-JUL-1997
IB -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 11 1 000 1 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
9128272Wl 06.500% 05/31/2002 DD 06/02/97 23-JUL-1997
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 23-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20 1 000 1 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 18-JUN-1997
999ABG079 7.000% 07/15/2002 23-JUL-1997
FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 23-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
20 1 000 1 000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 17-JUL-1997
999ABJ818 7.000% 08/15/2002 21-AUG-1997
B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & -----------
SALES
U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-400,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-JUL-1997 02581RUW1 07/30/1997 18-JUL-1997
S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4001000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-JUL-1997 02581RUW1 07/30/1997 18-JUL-1997
IS -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-400 1 000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 18-JUL-1997 02581RUW1 07/30/1997 18-JUL-1997
FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 18-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2 1 600,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 31-JUL-1997
02680JVN8 08/22/1997 31-JUL-1997
S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY -----------
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/
GAIN LOSS ------------------
-99,631.15 0.00
0.00
-11,259,474.90 -11,259,474.90
0.00
-20,175,000.00
-20,175,000.00
0.00
-20,237,500.00
20,237,500.00
0.00
397,845.56 -397,845.56
0.00
1, 421.11
0.00
0.00
399,266.67 399,266.67
0.00
2,576,036.67
-2,576,036.67
0.00
Page 7
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS --------------------
-99, 631.15
0.00 0.00
0.00
-11,259,474.90 0.00
0.00
0.00
-20,175,000.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
-20,237,500.00 20,237,500.00
0.00
0.00
397,845.56
-397,845.56 0.00 0.00
1,421.11
0.00 0.00
0.00
399,266.67
0.00 0.00
0.00
2,576,036.67
-2,576,036.67
0.00
0.00
LOCAL
.,., ~
BASE: USO TMlOO
PRICE/
BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/ ------------------
101.453125
101.453125 1.000000000
101.453125 101.453125 1.000000000
100.875000 100.875000
1.000000000
101.187500 101.187500
1.000000000
99.461390
99.461390
1.000000000
99.461390
99.461390 1.000000000
99.461390
99.461390 1.000000000
99.078333 99.078333
1.000000000
MELLON TRUST OCSG000100
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE 01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE --------------------------------------------------------------LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-2,600,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC
02680JVN8 08/22/1997
IS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997
-2,600,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 31-JUL-1997
02680JVN8 08/22/1997 31-JUL-1997
FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 31-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 18-JUL-1997
07815JUV8 07/29/1997 18-JUL-1997 S MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES -FIX-----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC
07815JUV8 07/29/1997 IS
18-JUL-1997
18-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 18-JUL-1997 07815JUV8 07/29/1997 18-JUL-1997 FC MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES -FIX 18-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 16-JUL-1997 36959HUP0 07/23/1997 16-JUL-1997 S MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES -FIX-----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC
36959HUP0 07/23/1997
IS
16-JUL-1997
16-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -4,600,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 16-JUL-1997
36959HUP0 07/23/1997 16-JUL-1997
FC MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES -FIX 16-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC
36959HVF1 08/15/1997
31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997
Page 8
LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/
GAIN LOSS
15,192.66
0.00
0.00
2,591,229.33
2,591,229.33
0.00
1, 391,000. 33
-1,391,000.33
0.00
6,659.73
0.00
0.00
1,397,660.06
1,397,660.06
0.00
4,535,860.67 -4,535,860.67
0.00
59,210.94
0.00
0.00
4,595,071.61
4,595,071.61
0.00
9,124,828.33 -9,124,828.33
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS
15,192.66
0.00
0.00 0.00
2,591,229.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,391,000.33 -1,391,000.33
0.00
0.00
6,659.73 0.00
0.00
0.00
1,397,660.06 0.00
0.00
0.00
4,535,860.67 -4,535,860.67 0.00
0.00
59,210.94 0.00
0.00 0.00
4,595,071.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
9,124,828.33
-9,124,828.33
----~------
BASE: USO
TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/
99.078333 99.078333
1.000000000
99.078333
99.078333 1.000000000
99.357166
99.357166
1.000000000
99.357166
99.357166
1.000000000
99.357166
99.357166 1.000000000
98.605667 98.605667 1.000000000
98.605667 98.605667
1.000000000
98.605667
98.605667
1.000000000
99.182917
99.182917
a
OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED
MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC
36959HVF1 08/15/1997
IS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997
-9,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 31-JUL-1997
36959HVF1 08/15/1997 31-JUL-1997
FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 31-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-8,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC
63743CVN0 08/22/1997 S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-8,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC
63743CVNO 08/22/1997 IS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
18-JUL-1997
18-JUL-1997
18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997
-8,200,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 18-JUL-1997
63743CVNO 08/22/1997 18-JUL-1997
FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY 18-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC
63743CVN0 08/22/1997
S MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC
63743CVNO 08/22/1997
IS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC
63743CVNO 08/22/1997 FC MERRILL LYNCH GOVT SECS/MONEY
31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/
GAIN LOSS ------------------0.00
53,973.34
0.00
0.00
9,178,801.67
9,178,801.67
0.00
8,124,423.34 -8,124,423.34
0.00
31,649.72 0.00
0.00
8,156,073.06
8,156,073.06
0.00
7,728,110.00
-7,728,110.00
0.00
45,435.00
0.00
0.00
7,773,545.00
7,773,545.00
0.00
Page 9
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/ CURR GAIN LOSS
a) '".
BASE: USO
TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/ --------------------------------------0.00 1.000000000
0.00
53,973.34 99.182917
0.00 99.182917 0.00 1.000000000 0.00
9,178,801.67 99.182917
0.00 99.182917 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
8,124,423.34 99.078333
-8,124,423.34 99.078333 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
31,649.72 99.078333
0.00 99.078333 0.00 1.000000000 0.00
8,156,073.06 99.078333
0.00 99.078333 0.00 1.000000000 0.00
7,728,110.00 99.078333
-7, 728,110.00 99.078333
0.00 1.000000000 0.00
45,435.00 99.078333
0.00 99.078333 0.00 . 1.000000000 0.00
7,773,545.00 99.078333 0.00 99.078333 0.00 1.000000000
0.00
·---------··-·-~ ..
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETT.LE DATE/
COMPL DATE
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-889,178.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-02-JUL-1997 999495906 PUBLIC II 02-JUL-1997 s 02-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-91,027.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-03-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 03-JUL-1997 s 03-JUL-1997
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-138,625.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-03-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 03-JUL-1997 s 03-JUL-1997
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -94,555.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-09-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 09-JUL-1997 s 09-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -85,796.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-14-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 14-JUL-1997 s 14-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -47,000.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-18-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 18-JUL-1997 s 18-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-6.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-25-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 25-JUL-1997 s 25-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-72' 751.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-31-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 31-JUL-1997 s 31-JUL-1997
U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 US TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
-------
Page 10
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/
GAIN LOSS
889,178.00
-889,178.00
0.00
91,027.00
-91,027.00
0.00
138' 625 .00
-138' 625. 00 0.00
94,555.00
-94,555.00
0.00
85,796.00
-85,796.00 0.00
47,000.00
-47,000.00 0.00
6.00
-6.00
0.00
72 '751.00
-72 '751.00 0.00
7,098,437.50
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS
889,178.00
-889,178.00
0.00
0.00
91,027.00
-91,027.00
0.00 0.00
138' 625 .00 -138' 625. 00 0.00
0.00
94,555.00
-94,555.00 0.00
0.00
85,796.00
-85,796.00 0.00
0.00
47,000.00
-47,000.00
0.00
0.00
6.00
-6.00
0.00
0.00
72 '751.00 -72,751.00
0.00
0.00
7,098,437.50
-------
BASE: USO
TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/
1.000000
1.000000
1.000000000
1.000000
1.000000
1.000000000
1.000000
1.000000
1.000000000
1.000000
1.000000 1.000000000
1.000000
1.000000 1.000000000
1.000000
1.000000
1.000000000
1.000000 1.000000
1.000000000
1.000000
1.000000
1.000000000
101.406250
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997
S SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 US TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997
IS -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-7,000,000.00 US TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997
FC SALOMON BROS INC, NEW YORK 23-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997
S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997
IS -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-10,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 22-JUL-1997
912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DD 09/03/96 23-JUL-1997
FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 23-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997
9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -9,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997
9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997
IS -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-9,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997
9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997 FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 31-JUL-1997
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/
GAIN LOSS
-6,908,125.00
190,312.50
179,279.89
0.00
0.00
7,277,717.39
7' 277' 717. 39 0.00
10,648,476.56
-10,362,187.50
286,289.06
Page 11
268,919.84
0.00
0.00
10,917,396.40 10,917,396.40
0.00
9,127,265.63
-9,081,089.22
46,176.41
120,050.95
0.00
0.00
9,247,316.58
9,247,316.58
0.00
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS
-6,908,125.00
190, 312. so 0.00
179,279.89
0.00
0.00
0.00
7' 277' 717. 39 0.00
0.00
0.00
10,648,476.56 -10,362,187.50
286,289.06
0.00
268,919.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
10,917,396.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
9,127,265.63
-9,081,089.22
46,176.41
0.00
120,050.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
9,247,316.58
0.00
0.00 0.00
a\ .,
BASE: USO
TM100
LOCAL PRICE/ BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/
101.406250
1.000000000
101.406250
101.406250
1.000000000
101.406250 101.406250
1.000000000
101.414062 101.414062
1.000000000
101.414062 101.414062
1.000000000
101.414062
101.414062 1.000000000
101.414062 101.414062
1.000000000
101.414062 101.414062
1.000000000
101.414062
101.414062
1.000000000
OCSG000100
CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED
MELLON TRUST
POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
-24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997
9128272T8 06.375%. 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997
S LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997 9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997
IS -----------
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-24,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUL-1997
9128272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DD 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997
FC LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NY 31-JUL-1997
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC
999ABG079 7.000% 07/15/2002
S BANQUE NATIONALE DE, PARIS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC
999ABG079 7.000% 07/15/2002 FC BANQUE NATIONALE DE, PARIS
MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-4,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC
02581RU84 07/08/1997 MT BOND MATURITY
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC
26354AUE2 07/14/1997
MT BOND MATURITY
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,700,000.00 OU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC
26354AUE2 07/14/1997 MT BOND MATURITY
----------------
17-JUL-1997 23-JUL-1997
17-JUL-1997 23-JUL-1997
23-JUL-1997
08-JUL-1997 08-JUL-1997
08-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/
GAIN LOSS
24,337,500.00 -24,216,237.92
121,262.08
320,135.87
0.00 0.00
24,657,635.87 24,657,635.87
0.00
20,260,937.50 -20,175,000.00
85,937.50
20,260,937.50 20,260,937.50
0.00
4,273,578.89
-4,273,578.89
0.00
496,933.33
-496,933.33
0.00
1,689,573.33
-1,689,573.33
0.00
Page 12
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS
24,337,~00.00, -24,216,237.92.
121,262.08
0.00
320,135.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
24,657,635.87
0.00
0.00 0.00
20,260,937.50
-20,175,000.00
85,937.50 0.00
20,260,937.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,273,578.89
-4,273,578.89
0.00
0.00
496,933.33
-496 I 933 • 33 0.00 .
0.00
1,689,573.33
-1,689,573.33
0.00 0.00
BASE: USO TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/
101.406250
101.406250
1.000000000
101.406250
101.406250
1.000000000
101.406250
101.406250
1.000000000
101.304688
101.304688 1.000000000
101.304688
101.304688 1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000 1.000000000
100.000000 100.000000
1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000 1.000000000
d
OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR VALUE
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-300,000.00 EMERSON ELEC DISC
29101CU16 07/01/1997
MT BOND MATURITY
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
Ol-JUL-1997
01-JUL-1997
Ol-JUL-1997
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/
GAIN LOSS
299,948.75
-299,948.75
0.00
-2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 03-JUL-1997 2,379,429.33
313385HR0 MAT 07/03/1997 03-JUL-1997 -2,379,429.33
MT BOND MATURITY 03-JUL-1997 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 18-JUL-1997 691,643.17
313589JG9 MAT 07/18/1997 18-JUL-1997 -691,643.17
MT BOND MATURITY 18-JUL-1997 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 09-JUL-1997 199,172.00
34110AU92 07/09/1997 09-JUL-1997 -199,172.00
MT BOND MATURITY 09-JUL-1997 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 31-JUL-1997 99,878.89 34539TUX1 07/31/1997 31-JUL-1997 -99,878.89
MT BOND MATURITY 31-JUL-1997 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-JUL-1997 495,566.67
34539TU37 07/03/1997 03-JUL-1997 -495,566.67 MT BOND MATURITY 03-JUL-1997 0.00
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-200,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 03-JUL-1997 198,226.67
34539TU37 07/03/1997 03-JUL-1997 -198,226.67
MT BOND MATURITY 03-JUL-1997 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 07-JUL-1997 1,488,994.17
34539TU78 07/07/1997 07-JUL-1997 -1,488,994.17
MT BOND MATURITY 07-JUL-1997 0.00
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
-1,500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 23-JUL-1997 1,479,085.00
36959HUP0 07/23/1997 23-JUL-1997 -1,479,085.00
--------------------
Page 13
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS
299,948.75
-299,948.75
0.00
0.00
2,379,429.33
-2,379,429.33 0.00
0.00
691,643.17
-691,643.17
0.00
0.00
199,172.00
-199,172.00 0.00
0.00
99,878.89
-99,878.89
0.00 0.00
495,566.67
-495,566.67
0.00
0.00
198,226.67
-198,226.67
0.00
0.00
1,488,994.17
-1,488,994.17
0.00
0.00
1,479,085.00
-1,479,085.00
--~----------
a I ~
BASE: USO TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/
100.000000
100.000000
1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000 1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000 1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000 1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000
1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000
1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000
1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000 1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000
OCSG000100 CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
MELLON TRUST
POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/ GAIN LOSS
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS
BASE: USO
TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MT BOND MATURITY
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-400,000.00 IBM DISC
44922AU32 07/03/1997
INTEREST
MT BOND MATURITY
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
-800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC
63743CUJO 07/18/1997 MT BOND MATURITY
U.S. DOLLAR LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
4,300,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC
02581RU84 07/08/1997
IT
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC
26354AUE2 07/14/1997
IT
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,700,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC
26354AUE2 07/14/1997 IT
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
300,000.00 EMERSON ELEC DISC 29101CU16 07/01/1997
IT
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC
313385HR0 MAT 07/03/1997
IT
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
700,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC
313589JG9 MAT 07/18/1997
IT
23-JUL-1997 '
03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997
18-JUL-1997 18-JUL-1997
18-JUL-1997
08-JUL-1997 08-JUL-1997
08-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
14-JUL-1997
Ol-JUL-1997
Ol-JUL-1997
01-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997
18-JUL-1997 18-J'lJL-1997
18-JUL-1997
Page 14
0.00
398, 211. 67
-398' 211. 67 0.00
791,954.44
-791,954.44 0.00
26,421.11
26,421.11 0.00
3,066.67
3,066.67
0.00
10,426.67
10,426.67 0.00
51.25 51.25
0.00
20,570.67
20,570.67
0.00,
8,356.83
8,356.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
398,211.67
-398' 211. 67 0.00
0.00
791,954.44
-791,954.44 0.00
0.00
26,421.11
0.00 0.00
0.00
3,066.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
10,426.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
51. 25 0.00
0.00
0.00
20,570.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
8,356.83
0.00 0.00
1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000
1.000000000
100.000000
100.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000
1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000 0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000
1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000
1.000000000
---------
G
OCSG000100 CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED
SHARES/PAR VALUE
SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC
34110AU92 07/09/1997 IT
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
100,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 34539TUX1 07/31/1997
IT
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 34539TU37 07/03/1997
IT
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
200,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 34539TU37 07/03/1997
IT
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC
34539TU78 07/07/1997
IT
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
1,500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC
36959HUP0 07/23/1997
IT
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
400,000.00 IBM DISC
44922AU32 07/03/1997
IT
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC
63743CUJ0 07/18/1997
IT
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
MELLON TRUST POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
Ol-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
09-JUL-1997
09-JUL-1997
09-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997 31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997
07-JUL-1997
07-JUL-1997
07-JUL-1997
23-JUL-1997
23-JUL-1997
23-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997 03-JUL-1997
03-JUL-1997
18-JUL-1997
18-JUL-1997
18-JUL-1997
Page 15
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/ GAIN LOSS
828.00 828.00
0.00
121.11 121.11
0.00
4,433.33 4,433.33
0.00
1,773.33 1,773.33
0.00
11,005.83 11,005.83
0.00
20,915.00
20,915.00
0.00
1,788.33
1,788.33
0.00
8,045.56
8,045.56
0.00
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS
0.00
828.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
121.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,433.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,773.33
0.00
0.00 0.00
11,005.83
0.00
0.00 0.00
20,915.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
1, 788. 33
0.00 0.00 0.00
8,045.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
... , ...
BASE: USO
TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/ BASE XRATE/
0.000000
0.000000
1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000
1.000000000
·-----------------·--·--.
OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST
CS DOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS -LOCAL/BASE
01-JUL-1997 -31-JUL-1997
SHARES/PAR VALUE SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/
TRANS CODE BROKER
EFFECTIVE DATE/
SETTLE DATE/
COMPL DATE
0.00 SHORT TERM FDS INT ADJ
990000PJ4 NET OF OVERNIGHT INTEREST
CD AND OVERDRAFT EXPENSES
LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO
31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997
31-JUL-1997
0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-01-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 01-JUL-1997
IT 01-JUL-1997
LIQUID OPER-PIMCO
0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT-01-JUL-1997
999495906 PUBLIC II 01-JUL-1997 IT 01-JUL-1997
Page 16
LOCAL AMOUNT/
COST/ GAIN LOSS
11.06
11.06
0.00
1,192.81
1,192.81
0.00
443.69
443.69 0.00
BASE AMOUNT/
COST/
INV GAIN LOSS/
CURR GAIN LOSS
11.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,192.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
443.69
0.00 0.00
0.00
BASE: USO TMlOO
LOCAL PRICE/
BASE PRICE/
BASE XRATE/
0.000000
0.000000
1.000000000
0.000000
0.000000 1.000000000
0.000000 0.000000
1.000000000
OMTS:
PDC:
FAHR: All
EXEC:
STEER:
JT.BDS: 8/27 /97
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
AGENDA
ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
CONTACT FOR INl:ORMATION
(Originator)
720, Jim Harris, 5063
Division No., Name, and Extension
JOB NO. J-31-3 PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE, JOB NO. J-31-3 (All
Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to add instrumentation
and equipment to automate processes at the Plant No. 1 Headworks, and provide additional capability to
monitor process information from a remote location.
Recommended Action(s):
1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; 2) waive bid irregularities as to form; and 3) authorize
award of a contract for Job No. J-31-3, Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, to Systems
Integrated, to add instrumentation and equipment to automate processes at the Plant No. 1 Headworks, in a
total amount of $694,000.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
Final EIR Approved on 7/19/89 and Notice of Determination filed on 7/20/89 6/25/97
CURRENT BUDGET/COST
INFORMATION
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $739,000
SOURCE: CORF
Schedule/Line Items: C.4.a
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
INFORMATION
First Year in Budget:: '91-'92
Master Plan Estimate: $850,000
Year of F'nt Costs: '91-'92
THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST
INFORMATION
CURRENT YEAR
BUDGET AMOUNT
$739,000
ORIGINAL BUDGET
TOTAL
$850,000.00
ORIGINAL BID, PO,
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
$0.00
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES
If YES, state number: _Permanent _ Limited Term
Revised DSl14J97
H:\WP .DTA\ENG\ENG\J-31-3\AIT.723
CURRENT YEAR-
TO-DATE
EXPENDITURES
$0
PREVIOUS BUDGET
CHANGES
$463,760.00
CHANGE ORDERS,
FUNDS PREY.
APPROVED
$0.00
YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET
BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
(Total Budget plus
Transfers)
$739,000 $739,000
BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL
THISAIT PROJECT BUDGET
$0.00 $1,313,760.00
AMOUNT AMENDED
REQUESTED THIS PROJECT
AIT AMOUNT
$694,000.00 $694,000.00
REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES NO NOT APPLICABLE
If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
Page 1of2
~~ 0-~ 5?¥'14\ Jen
Originator ------' ~ I Date
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List):
1.
ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List)
1. Budaet Information Table
2. Bid Summary
3. General Counsel Memorandum dated July 23, 1997
4. Shasta Electric Bid Protest Letter Dated July 22, 1997
5. Shasta Electric Bid Protest Withdrawal Letter dated August 7, 1997
The Boards of Directors approved the plans and specifications for this project for bid at their meeting of
June 25, 1997, two bids were submitted for the project Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade,
Job No. J-31-3. The bids ranged from a low of $694,000 submitted by Systems Integrated, to a high of $746, 100.
The engineer's estimate was $700,000.
Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade, Job J-31-3, will provide additional automation which will allow
operations staff to operate and monitor plant systems from the Control Center. These upgraded facilities will include
additional fiber optic communication, process control equipment and miscellaneous additional control equipment.
This work will ultimately increase system reliability and performance.
Due to a printing error, several pages of the Detailed Specifications were omitted. These pages included
background information about the contractor and other miscellaneous items that did not effect the final bid amount.
Due to this information not being included with the bid documents, Shasta Electric submitted a protest to awarding
this work to Systems Integrated. Subsequently the protest was withdrawn. It is the opinion of the Districts General
Counsel that this omission was inconsequential and does not effect the final price quoted for this Bid Proposal. The
Director of Engineering recommends waiving the bid irregularities associated with this Bid Proposal.
The Director of Engineering recommends award of a contract to Systems Integrated, in the amount of $694,000.
JRH:jmf
H:\WP .OTA \ENG\ENG\J-31-3\AIT. 723
c: Department Head
A GM-Ad ministration
A GM-Operations
General Manager
Revised 05114197
H:\WP .OTA \ENG\ENG\J-31-3\AIT.723
Page 2 of2
TASK BUDGET
(ADOPTED
BY CORF)
DESIGN
Consultant $475,000
Staff $32,000
CONSTRUCTION
Contractor $718,500
Staff $88,260
TOTAL $1,313,760
H:\WP .DTA\ENG\ENG\J-31.3\BUDTBL.AIT
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Plant 1 Headworks No. 2 Control System Upgrade
Job No. J-31-3
FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED
AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE
TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE
FUNDS
$475,000 $475,000 $475,000
$32,000 $32,000 $32,000
$0 $694,000 $694,000 $0
$88,260 $88,260 $5,000
$595,260 $694,000 $1,289,260 $512,000
~ • -I'
ESTIMATED%
COMPLETE TO DATE
100%
100%
0%
6%
July 22, 1997
11:00 a.m.
BID TABULATION
JOB NO. J-31-3
PROJECT TITLE: PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGBADE
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $700.000.
==============================================
TOTAL
CONTRACTOR BID
==============================================
1. SYSTEMS INTEGRATED $694,000.00
2. SHASTA ELECTRIC $746, 100.00
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible
bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Systems Integrated in the bid amount of $694,000.00 as the
lowest and best bid.
H:\WP .OTA \ENG\ENG\J-31-3\BIDTAB.LST
David A. Ludwin, P.E.
Director of Engineering
•
./-I~
'{ ~July22, 1997
SHASTA ELECTRIC LP
LIC. NO. 683876
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
I 0844 Ellis A venue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Attn:
Ref:
Mr. David Ludwin, P.E.
Plant I Headwork's No. 2
Control System Upgrade
Job No. J-31-3
Subject: Project Award to System Integrated
Dear Mr. Ludwin,
?.ECEIVED
Ef\iGINEERIN(J
DEPARTMENT
JUL 2 4 1997
COUNTY SANITATIQtl
DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY
In accordance with the Districts policies and procedures, Shasta Electric formally protests
the award of Job No. J-31-3 to the apparent low bidder (Systems Integrated).
Upon review of Systems Integrated's bid proposal the following required documents were
not provided and therefore result in a non-responsive bid as submitted.
a) Section 51 of the Contract Documents including but not limited
to Sections 51-7, 51-8, 51-9, 51-10 and 51-11.
b) Section 52-0110 Item C in its entirety.
Shasta Electric has recently completed Job No. J-31-2 for the Districts which is practically
a mirror image of Job No. J-31-3. This project was completed ahead of st:hedule and to
the satisfaction of the Districts (see attached Districts Correspondence).
Shasta Electric respectfully acknowledges that the District has the right to either reject all
bids associated with Job J-31-3 or to award to the low responsive bidder. At this time
rejecting all bids could undermine not only the public bidding fair policies but also provide
the Districts with an inferior project. It is with this in mind that Shasta Electric formally
requests the District to award Job No. J-31-3 to the low responsive bidder Shasta Electric.
Respectfully,
Dennis Derieg
Vice President
DD/dp
655 BREA CANYON ROAD •WALNUT, CALIFORNIA 91789 • (909) 594-2341
P.O. BOX 488 •WALNUT, CALIFORNIA 91788-0488 •FAX (909) 594-4134
April 29. 1997
Date:
Location:
Attendees:
• •
MEETING MJNYTES
Ocean Outfall Control System Upgrade
Job No. J-31-2
April 22, 1997 10:00 a.m.
Plant 2 Construction Mgmt. Conference Room
Dean Fisher. OCSD
Jim Elo. OCSD
Jim Niswonger, Shasta Electric
Frank Steiger, CH2MHill
Joe Chester. OCSD
Wade Chilson, OCSD
Randy Tinsley, Canus Corp.
This is the final project meeting for this project. Currently the project is 100% complete and in service.
This meeting was held to specifically discuss any outstanding punch list work, and outstanding
aocumentat!on issues.
Punch List Work
The contractor was given direction regarding the final remaining work on the project on February 11. This
"punch" list was developed from Construction Management input as wen as feedback from the Final
Inspection held with other Districts• departments on January 21, 1997. For reference, this list is attached
and was reviewed during the meeting.
All the items are completed with exception of the following:
OOBS PCMS. Item 1 -All of the jumper routing work is completed except labeling. The contractor will
provide labeling for these jumpers by next week.
OOBS PCMS. Item 5 • The required test plugs were given to the Districts during the meeting. These were
given to Wade Chilson for maintenance use.
OOBS PCMS, Item 6 -The nameplate legends on CB and CA were satisfied by the contractor, however
since that time they have been removed. The contractor will print a new legend for the Districts.
OOBS PCMS, Item 21 -This was determined to be out of the scope of the contract.
OOBS PCMS. Item 28 ·All O&M information has been reviewed by the Districts. The contractor is
currently making the required copies of this information for final transmittal to the Districts. Most as-built
information has been reviewed and received by the Districts, including electronic copies of all drawings.
One copy of the "markups" is still being reviewed by the Districts. Dean will return these plans and any
review comments to the contrador.
IFMS, Item 3 -The cover will be left as is. In lieu of this replacement. the contractor shall seal the floor
opening of the new cabinet with grout.
IFMS, Item 5 .. See OOBS PCMS. Item 28, above.
I I :: I
i .
!
I
J-31-2 Meeting Minutes
4/22/97
Page2
Software
•
The OOBS software documentation will be handled by the following:
•
Frank Steiger will E-Mail the OOBS PLC configuration with descriptors to Wade after the meeting. The
IFMS software is already wen documented. For an practical purposes the software is final for the project.
This software, however. will be continually refined and updated out of the scope of this project. Wade will
make a hard copy for maintenance files.
CH2MHill is also working on updating sections of the original OOBS Operation Manual provided by JCE.
He said that they are nearing completion of these documents.
• •• • •• •• I•. • •' ·-......... ..
·•···
One Final Note ........
'" The word •team" is used far too often to describe groups of individuals thrown together by circumstance
who never really work together as a team. The use of this term becomes diluted to a point where true
teamwork is not expected. nor is the value of teamwork recognized. Such is not the case here. The
group below comprises the construction team for this project This project team represents a technically
competent group ot individuals who focused on the project at hand, solved the problems as a group, and
often chose the more difficult route for the good of the project. Every member of this team has a feeling of
satisfaction and pride with the outcome of the project. As a member of this team, I am fortunate to have
worked with this group. As a Districts representative for this project. the Districts would like to take this
\
1.
\
\ j
opportunity to say Athank you• for a job wen done.
\ Shasta/Canus: Roger Cates, Jim Niswonger and Randy nnsley I
\ CH2MHill: Alan Carrie, Dave Halverson and Frank Steiger . ~ CSDOC: Joe Chester, Wade Chilson, Dean Fisher, Jim Elo, Shamshad Hyder, Jim /
1
-
::~-d5ii~~:~~·--~~~-~~:-~~::·--·--··· .--···-·· .--------··'
The meeting record above was compiled by Dean Fisher. If there is any discrepancy as to the
accuracy or completeness of the record please notify him at once. If there are no comments
received within 14 days after issuance, the minutes will be assumed correct and will become a
part of the project record.
OF:df
l:\FISHER\JOBFILES\J..31 ·2'4--22·97.MTG
Attachment
c: J. Linder (file)
C. Cervellone
C. Lee
D. Cook
A. Carrie (CH2MHill)
G. Jones
S. Hyder
L. Kraemer
R. Thompson
SHASTA ELECTRIC LP
August 7. 1997
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Attn: Mr. David Lud~ P.E.
Ref: Plant I Headwork's No. 2
Control System Upgrade
Job No. J-31-l
LIC. NO. 683876
Subject: Project Award to System Integrated
Dear Mr. Ludwin,
Shasta Electric formally withdraws our protest letter for the above referenced project
dated 7/2'2197.
Respectfully"
SHASTA ELECTRIC, LP
~ '~------Dennis ·eg
Vice President
DD/dp
655BRIACANION10AD •WALNUT. CALIFOINIA 91789 • (909) 594-2341
TOTAL P.01
1
.-----------------------.
0 COMM. INFO. ITEM
0 COMM. ACTION ITEM
0 JT. BOS.· CONSENT
0 JT. BOS. DISCUSSION
(NON-CONSENT)
0 PUBLIC HEARING
For Bd. Sec. Use Ontv
f/_;l'J mT. BOS. MEETING DATE
lb JT. BOS. AGENDA ITEM NO.
MEETING DATE
OMTS:
PDC:
FAHR:
EXEC:
STEER:
JT.BDS: 8/27/97
COMM. ID. NO.
OMTS ___ _
PDC ____ _
FAHR. ___ _
EXEC ___ __..
STEER....__ __ _
DISTRICT NO.
All
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
AGENDA
ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
CONTACT FOR INFORMATION
(Originator)
720, Wendy Sevenandt, 5058
Division No., Name, and Extension
JOB NO. P2-46-2, RECLAIMED WATER EXTENSION TO HEADWORKS "C" AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts):
The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to extend the reclaimed water
piping to Headworks "C" for improved reliability of water supply for the main sewage pumps.
Recommended Action{s):
1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 2) authorize award of a contract for
Job No. P2-46-2, Reclaimed Water Extension to Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, to Atlas Allied, Inc., extending
reclaimed water piping to Headworks "C", in a total amount of $139,680.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO
Final EIR Approved on 7/19/89 and Notice of Determination filed on
7/20/89
CURRENT BUDGET/COST
INFORMATION
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $784,000
SOURCE: CORF
Schedule/Line Items: B.6.a.
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
INFORMATION
First Year in Budget: '91-'92
Master Plan Estimate: 4,615,000
Year of First Costs: '91-'92
THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST
INFORMATION
CURRENT YEAR
BUDGET AMOUNT
$784,000
ORIGINAL
BUDGET TOTAL
$4,615,000.00
ORIGINAL BID,
PO, CONTRACT
AMOUNT
$0.00
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO
If YES, state number: _ Permanent _ Limited Term
Revised 04/10/97
H:\WP .DTA\ENG\ENG\P2-46-2\AITAWD.WPD
DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC
ITEM:
6/25/97
CURRENT YEAR-
TO-DATE
EXPENDITURES
$0
PREVIOUS BUDGET
CHANGES
($852,000.00}
CHANGE ORDERS,
FUNDS PREV.
APPROVED
$0.00
YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET
BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
{Tola! Budget plus
Transfers)
$784,000 $784,000
BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL
THISAIT PROJECT
BUDGET
$0.00 $3, 763,000. 00
AMOUNT AMENDED
REQUESTED THIS PROJECT
AIT AMOUNT
$139,680.00 $139,680.00
REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO
If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
Page 1of2
.....-----------------------,.-----------------.-.. ·---··
ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List):
Originator Date
Signatu
Assistant General Manager (Or Designee)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
This project is for the extension of a reclaimed water pipeline. This new pipeline will supply reclaimed water to the
main pumps used to pump sewage through Treatment Plant No. 2. These pumps are located in the Headworks
"C" facility. The extension of the reclaimed water line to these Main Sewage Pumps is necessary to resolve two
issues concerning the current use of potable water at these pumps. The first issue is the reliability of the water
supply. The second issue is a health concern. This project will improve the reliability of water feed to the pump
seals while meeting Health Code requirements by changing the water supply from potable water to reclaimed
water with plant water back-up.
A new City Water Pump Station is under construction at Treatment Plant No. 2 (Job No. P2-46). During
construction of this pump station, Operations became concerned that a loss of both Edison and Central Generation
power sources would cause the City Water Pumps to shut-down. The shut-down of the City Water Pumps would
cause the loss of cooling and lubricating water to the Main Sewage Pumps. These pumps are a critical process
component, since the Main Sewage Pumps are critical for maintaining sewage flow through the treatment facilities.
The reliability of water supply to these Main Sewage Pumps is improved by switching the water supply from
potable water to reclaimed water with a plant water back-up.
Health Code requirements do not allow the connection of potable water systems to processes that directly treat
sewage. This switch from the potable water supply for the Main Sewage Pumps to reclaimed water will correct
this.
The plans and specifications for this project were approved for bid by the Boards of Directors at their meeting of
June 25, 1997. On July 22, 1997, six bids were submitted for the project Reclaimed Water Extension to
Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46-2. The bids ranged from a low of $139,680 submitted by Atlas Allied
Inc., to a high of $167,000. The engineer's estimate was $160,000.
The Director of Engineering recommends award of a contract to Atlas Allied, Inc., in the amount of $139,680.
The funds for this project, Job No. P2-46-2, are allocated from the CORF line item for Job No. P2-46. Thus, the
Budget Information Table shows the allocation of the entire line item budget of $3, 763,000 between the two
projects, Job No. P2-46-2 and Job No. P2-46.
WTS:jmf
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\P2-46-2\TEST.WPD
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
A GM-Operations
General Manager
Revised 04/10/97
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\P2-46-2\TEST.WPD
Page 2of2
TASK BUDGET
(ADOPTED
BY CORF)
P2-46/P2-46-2
DESIGN-Consultant
P2-46 $320,310
P2-46-2 $10,000
DESIGN-Staff $75,000
CONST. Contractor
P2-46 $2,920,000
P2-46-2 $150,000
CONST. Consultant $80,000
CONST.Staff $207,690
TOTAL $3,763,000
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Reclaimed Water Extension to Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2
Job No. P2-46-2
FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED
AUTHORIZED AUTHO~IZA TION TOTAL AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURE TO
TO DATE REQUEST FUNDS DATE
$320,310 $320,310 $320,310
$10,000 $10,000 $10,000
$75,000 $75,000 $75,000
$2,774,854 $2,774,854 $1,831,000
-0-$139,680 $139,680 -0-
$80,000 $80,000 $74,000
$207,690 $207,690 $124,614
$3,467,854 $139,680 $3,607,534 $2.434,924
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\P2-46-2\AGENDA2.TBL
ESTIMATED °lo
COMPLETE TO DATE
100%
100%
100%
66%
-0-
92%
40%
67%
July 22, 1997
11:00 a.m.
BID TABULATION
JOB NO I PZ-46-2
PROJECT TITLE: RECLAIMED WATER EXTENSION TO HEAPWORKS •c• AT PLANT NO. 2
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $160 000
==============================================
TOTAL
CONTRACTOR BID
==============================================
1. ATLAS ALLIED, INC. $139,680.00
2. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $144,596.00
3. S.S. MECHANICAL CORP. $147,537.00
4. OLSSON CONSTRUCTION $154,000.00
5. MARGA TE CONSTRUCTION $158,300.00
6. ECOLOGY CONSTRUCTION, INC. $167 ,000.00
7.
8.
9.
10.
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible
bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Atlas Allied, Inc. in the amount of $139,680.00 as the lowest
and best bid.
H:\WP .OTA \EN6\ENG\P2-46-2\BIDTAB.LST
David A. Ludwin, P .E.
Director of Engineering
~~: ... :·· ~~~~~ ,~.AGENDA
PDC:
FAHR:
EXEC: 3
STEER:
JT.BDS: 8/27/97
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
CONTACT FOR INFORMATION
(Originator)
3720, Chuck Winsor, x5052
Division No., Name, and Extension
CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3, IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 3
(District 3) : The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to Mladen Buntich
Construction Co., Inc. to replace a portion and increase the capacity of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System
in Imperial Highway between Beach and Harbor Boulevards in the City of La Habra.
Recommended Actjon(s):
1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation ; 2) Approve Addenda Nos. 1 , 2 and 3 to the Plans
and Specifications ; and 3) Authorize award of a contract to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. for
Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3, Contract No. 3-38-3 in the total amount of
$4,587,000.00.
CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: NO
Final EIR Approved on July 19, 1989; and
Notice of Determination filed on July 20, 1989
CURRENT BUDGET/COST
INFORMATION
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $3,330,000.00
SOURCE: CIP • DISTRICT 3
Schedule/Line Items: D3, Item 8
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
INFORMATION
First Year in Budget 1995 -96
Master Plan Estimate: $1,440,000
Year of First Costs: 1995 • 96
Il:llS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST
INFORMATION
CURRENT YEAR
BUDGET AMOUNT
$2,000,000
ORIGINAL
BUDGET TOTAL
$3,330,000.00
ORIGINAL BID, PO,
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
$4,587,000.00
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO
If YES, state number: _ Permanent _ Limited Term
Revised 05114197
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\3.38-3\AWDCONT.AIT
DATE OF MOST RECENT BQABJ2 ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM:
6/25/97
CURRENT YEAR-YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET
TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
EXPENDITURES (Total Budget plus
Transfers)
$9,917 $1,990,083 $2,000,000
PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL
CHANGES THISAIT PROJECT BUDGET
N/A $1,562,000.00 $4,892,000.00
CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED
FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT
APPROVED AIT AMOUNT
N/A $4,587,000.00 $4,587,000.00
REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO
If YES, explain In ADDmONAL INFORMATION section
Page 1of3
Signature
Assistant General Manager (Or Designee)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List):
1.
ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List)
1. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation
In the 1989 Master Plan, the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System was listed as deficient along Beach Boulevard in
the northern portion of the City of Buena Park , in the southern portion of the City of La Habra and along Imperial
Highway between Beach and Harbor Boulevards. This deficiency is due to projected residential development on
both sides of Beach Boulevard and in the surrounding area formerly dominated by oil field operations. That
development is now going forward and the increased sewer capacity is needed. This project is to install nearly two
miles of gravity sewer in the number three (slow) lane of Imperial Highway between Beach and Harbor Boulevards.
The City of La Habra has requested that the District include their job; a right turn lane, sidewalk, curb and gutter
modifications and street improvements at the intersection of Idaho Street and Imperial Highway, in this bid. The
City had estimated that their portion of the job would cost $0.45 million. Their portion of the bid came in at
$300,856.30. This will be reimbursed to the District through an agreement approved by the District No. 3 Board of
Directors, on May 28, 1997.
,,.
Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to the plans and specifications were necessary to provide various technical clarifications
to the plans and specifications during the bidding period to estimate the cost of the job, traffic control and related
Caltrans requirements. The cost of this project has increased during the design phase. The District had proposed a
sewer alignment for the median of Imperial Highway to avoid the congested amount of utilities on the south side of
the highway where there are two existing District No. 3 sewers. Caltrans rejected the proposed sewer alignment
based on their belief that it would potentially increase traffic congestion during maintenance periods. The District
had little choice but to use the same alignment as the oldest existing sewer, thereby requiring more work and
greater costs because of the greater amount of existing utilities on that side of the highway. The latest approved
alignment requires shutting down one or more travelled lanes to do the work which could have been avoided in the
median. The Caltrans encroachment permit severely restricted the hours of work due to traffic control concerns and
has required night work at most intersections. The result is an increase in construction costs.
On August 14, 1997, eleven bids were received for said contract. The bids ranged from a high of $6,474,423.00 to a
low of $4,587,000.00, submitted by Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. The latest Engineer's estimate was $3.76
million, including the City of La Habra work. After consulting with Boyle Engineering Corporation, the consultant on
this project, they indicated that their estimate did not adequately reflect the very restrictive working hours imposed
by Caltrans after the work was complete and the amount of additional effort needed to protect the existing utilities in
place due to Caltrans changing the pipeline alignment. After opening of the bids the contractors were polled for
reasons for the higher than estimated bid prices. The contractors evidently feel that they have no room and tittle
time during the day to maneuver construction equipment due to Caltrans restrictions and have limited their risk of
exposure by increasing their bids. Many contractors are now quite busy whereas during the past two to three years
their bids were more favorable to the District because of restrictive economic conditions and fewer jobs available.
Staff recommends approval of this contract to Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of
$4,587,000.00 and a budget increase of $1,592,000, increasing the total budget for this project from $3,330,000.00
to $4,892,000 to cover the cost of the bid plus the previously approved allowance for staff costs during the course of
the project. The money is available from District No. 3 reserves. A complete bid tabulation and recommendation is
attached.
RO\llS8d051141W Page2 of3
H:\WP .DTA\ENG\ENG\3-38-3\AWDCONT.AIT
BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE
Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Reach 3
Contract No. 3-38-3
TASK 1997-98 FUNDS
APPROVED AUTHORIZED
BUDGET
-
DESIGN $130,000
CONSTRUCTION $3,000,000
STAFF COSTS $200,000
CITY OF $0.00
LA HABRA
STREET
IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO.
2-R-97, TO BE
BID WITH
CONTRACT
NO. 3-38-3, and
Reimbursed by
the City.
-
TOTAL $3,330,000
CFW:jmf
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\3-38-3\AWDCONT.AIT
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
A GM-Operations
General Manager
Revised 05/14197
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG\3-38-3\AWOCONT.AIT
TO DATE
$105,000
$0.00
$200,000
$0.00
$305,000
THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED
AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE
REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE
FUNDS
$0.00 $105,000 $101,575
$4,286, 143. 70 $4,286, 143. 70 $0.00
$0.00 $200,000 $59,166
$300,856.30 $300,856.30 $0.00
$4,587,000.00 $4,892,000.00 $160,741
ESTIMATED
o/o COMPLETE
TO DATE
96.7%
0%
29.6%
0% -
3.29%
Page 3of3
August14,1997
12:00 p.m.
ADDENDA:-3_
BIO TABULATION
CONTRACT NO. 3.39.3 ANP PROJECT NO. 2-R-97
PROJECT TITLE: IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER·HOLPER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM. BEACH 3
CITY OF LA HABRA STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR AN EASTBOUND
BIGHT· TURN LANE AT THE IMPERIAL HIGHWAYODAHO STREET
INTERSECTION
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $3.763.348
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Mladen Buntlch Construction Co., Inc. $4,587 ,000.00
2. KEC Engineering $4,775,684.80 *
3. Albert W. Davis, Inc. $4,856,000.00
4. Southern California Underground $4,888,590.50 *
5. Christeve Corporation $5, 158,012.98
6. Steve Bubalo Construction $5,484,873.44 *
7. Fleming Engineering, Inc. $5,540,831.00 *
8. Vldo Artukovich & Son $5,737,469.00 *
9. Mike Prllch & Sons, Inc. $6,248,861.60
10. Vadnais Corporation $6,370,698.64
11. Murray Company $6,474.423.00
* Indicates corrected bid amount after reviewing bids
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid Is a responsible
bid. t, therefore, recommend award to Mtaden Bunttch Construction Company, Inc. In the bid amount of
$4,587,000.00 as the lowest and best bid. ~
~ ~~~~i~P.~o f Dlrecto~~lneering
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\ENG~-38-3\BIDTAB.LST
D COMM. INFO. ITEM
D COMM .. ACTION ITEM
D JT. BOS. CONSENT
D JT: BOS. DISCUSSION
(NON-CONSENT)
D~ ;_u:~::.EARING
For Bd Sec. Use Onrv
.lf#Jl!lYJT. BOS. MEETING DATE
J/( . Ji. BOS. AGENDA ITEM NO.
.
MEETING DATE COMM. ID. NO.
OMTS: OMTS
PDC: PDC
FAHR: ·FAHR
EXEC: . EXEC
STEER: :. STEER·· ..
JT.BDS: 8/27/97 '··· · .... ,., .. ,, ,,.
' .
DISTRICT NO.
7 and 14
AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):
Agenda Wording:
AGENDA
ITEM
TRANSMITTAL
CONTACT FOR INFORMATION
(Originator)
3730, Jim Herberg, 5086
Division No., Name, and Extension
ACCOMMODATION OF FLOWS AND TRANSFER OF CONNECTION FEES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD) AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 AND NO. 14 OF
ORANGE COUNTY (DISTRICT NO. 7 AND NO. 14): The Engineering Department requests approval of an
agreement that provides for the accommodation of flows from two small drainage areas, in District No. 7,
which are currently served by District No.14 through IRWD. Under this agreement District No. 7 will transfer to
District 14 connection fees previously collected by the City of Newport Beach on behalf of District No. 7.
Recommended Action(s):
1. Approve Accommodation of Flows and Transfer of Connection Fees Agreement with IRWD and CSDOC
NO. 7 AND NO. 14 as described herein.
CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES NO NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC
Date Notice of Exemption Filed: ITEM: --
Negative Declaration Approved on
Final EIR Approved on_ and Notice of Determination filed on_
CURRENT YEAR CURRENTYEAR-CURRENT BUDGET/COST
INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE
TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $
SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS
Schedule/Line Items:
AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:
Schedule/Line Item:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
INFORMATION
First Year in Budget
Master Plan Estimate:
Year of First Costs:
THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST
INFORMATION
Revised 05/14/97
H:\WP.DTA\ENG\3730\BERDANIS\FORMAT\AIT _IRWO.WPD
EXPENDITURES
N/A N/A
ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET
BUDGET TOTAL CHANGES
NIA NIA
ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS,
PO, CONTRACT FUNDS PREV.
AMOUNT APPROVED
YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET
BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL
(Total Budget plus
Transfers)
NIA N/A
BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL
THISAIT PROJECT
BUDGET
NIA $0.00
AMOUNT AMENDED
REQUESTED THIS PROJECT
AIT AMOUNT
$0.00
Page 1of2
WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES
If YES, state number: _ Permanent Limited Term
Originator Date
CONCURRENCES:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary)
REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES NO NOT APPLICABLE
If YES, explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section
ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA (List):
1. Accommodation of Flows and Connection Fees Agreement
between CSDOC No. 7, No. 14 and IRWD.
2. Legal Description with Exhibit A and B
ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA (List)
1.
Two small drainage areas in DISTRICT NO. 7, referred herein as "Parcel A" and "Parcel B," are served by
DISTRICT NO. 14 through IRWD. Both "Parcel A" and "Parcel B" are located in the northerly portion of the City of
Newport Beach; "Parcel A" is located east of Jamboree Road, between Bristol and Bayview Way and "Parcel B" is
located east of Jamboree Road, northerly of University Drive and adjacent to San Diego Creek. "Parcel A" is
currently occupied by Fletcher Jones Motors, an automobile dealership and 11Parcel B" by Irvine Apartment
Communities, a large apartment complex. Because there are no DISTRICT NO. 7 facilities within a reasonable
distance to serve these areas, the two sites must receive sewer service from IRWD.
The City of Newport Beach collected connection charges for both sites on behalf of District No. 7 when building
permits were taken. Although, both sites are physically located in District No. 7, they are, in fact, served by
District 14 through IRWD. Therefore, it is recommended that District No. 7 transfer the connection fees previously
collected by the City of Newport Beach to District No. 14. Ninety-five (95%) of the total connection fees collected
by the City are $85,078.46 for 11Parcel A" and $707,350.00 for "Parcel B." Five (5%) percent of the total connection
fees will be retained by the City of Newport Beach, pursuant to agreement with the District as reimbursement for its
administrative costs.
c: Department Head
AGM-Administration
AGM-Operations
General Manager
Revised 05114197
H:\WP.OTA\ENG\3730\BERDANIS\FORMAT\AIT _IRWD.WPD
Page 2of2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government C~de Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that
the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13and14 held on ~ D<? , 19??, was duly posted for public
inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ~ ~P , 19f'?.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this o2l;;tit.day of
-~._,...._ __ , 19fZ
BS/FormslF27A
Penny Kyle, ret
Boards of Dire tor County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
of Orange County, California
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE DATE
L .. 4 Ti/1114.6 A I 3/ 1'J/1'l
; .... . , . ... ~ _ ... . ' . " .. ·~ ·-.. .ft, ..... ~r..····d1.·:·; trl: i::!~Ytnnc:e~::n·a th~ ;·projtictsnowunderv~~ :.Reclaune :;· '.. ~umcledbfngwatersystemto toilthaets;t suppandllurinalses re-3>9'~-~~~~~. , t · · · .. · · · .. ' ·" """ WaterResourcesBoard;·i(~ .. ~~~~j ·;~.:.· · ........ :~? .. ~~l"~:}·:~:· ·~,.;·i·:.;.: .• ~·.::.. lna20-storylrvineofficetower. · . · For alJ.that. rec1a1meci witet~·~ ··Waste·Water =an~::.~· i~~~of.:..;:= >r;. .. . . . " • · , . · syetem at an elementary school farnia. · .. ,,,. · ·-r.~i "'.·~·;~:;~~
·> ,M· ~v--,.a·:·:;:?Y:·qE·· _.ra;_.·~~·s' .... e: ·:!~· .. ·?~~{; .; .. -;.r:dbetba!s:o~~ :~:::1::8:e~=~~~~
, . :f /'::; · •uaeates the grass but does not · Irvine Ran~·where:neirl1':"-·
·: .· ; ~~-~·i; send any water. to the surface, quarter Of the;~ter:comea.lfrom.l: . · .. ,. ·. . . .. ·. .. .... ' where it could come In contact treated-oe:·..,fo>~.~r'•Jii'~,,tt;-~~ :Sta.-.te ... ,., .. '"Thirs .•. 1 .. J.··>t, wtthchlldren. . :"It's•-~·-~~i . s . The Orange County Water ms~ If you juSt'let'th!s.water·~~r·BBldi.~. i .·· · . ·· , trlct is now considering plans ~ ·'.Jaffe, who _spent hfi:.law,~:ichoo~~" , . . ., . . . · ·. . · ·r ·, .. : . ezpand its reclamaUon operation ~dent loan to start· an· arpnieif . · .. · · ·" . ~.f~~··?~· ··~. using treated waste water from the farm In ~8'Bhadow of'.8aJ11Jose'~
I, · • R~ycllng: ~tte ·:.c.1; '~ · :. • county's sanitation districts. · treatment .p!Snt,' where htFgrowsi· . -..n .. ~•·' c,....,._ the -.....:.-• · The widespread use of waste · vegetableswdnglOcal~alnf~-1"'\;A uauur, P1~-~ water ts not without doubters. En-teclalmedwate? -~ ..,,.~-r:.f-":"'·1-"l.'.io#ilr
on the rise. San Diego is at'· . vl.ronmentallsts and Newport '. . People. sueh' ~.Jaffe: ~ftmd~/
.. · .. · Beach residents are fighting plans poJntlng out'tbat whll~·the· state's~
artting edge of what : ... :\ .: . by Irvine Ranch to flush treated rellanNevadace anondwathetee-.:Cofroloramdo· thRle Sv.lerei'rats7.· . · · ~ . water through .the San Joaquin backers see as wave of . · · Manh and Into Upper Newport coming under attack. recycled wa-/
fu din · · ted. Bay. Opponents fear the treated ter ts the one 8'lU1'Ce in-California tore: sen g trm . . sewage will foul the bay,' a fear· . that ts srowtng. . . ... :: •"'i~·~· ... : :· .. ttts also drought-proof./'·"' i~ ·.; .. ~: sewage back to the tap. · ·· wateromc:.= !8::1= ~ . And because reclafmed. water ts~
By JIU. LFDVY
TIMES STAFF WRITER.
In an effort tO help quench
California's unending thirst, offi-
cials are set to embark on unusual
plans to turn trea~ &e\Ylle fnto
drinking water. · < . ·
San Diego ts preparing to pipe ·.
water from the local sewage treat-
ment pJant ~Uy into the city's
second-largest drinking watel'. res-
ervoir. •
Communities in the South Bay_.
and Livermore, Calif., have re-:
cenUy joined the Orange Co1Dlty
Water District In approving the
Injection -of treated waste water
Into undergroun~ supplies ~!or
tap water.
Water recovered from treated
sewage has already become an
.Integral part of the state's water
supply. Despite high costs· and
worries over public squeamishness,
the use of "recycled" water has
increased about. 309' In . the . last year. . . . . '.· .,
. It is being used to make snow for · ~
I aid areas, srow hay, make news•
print and ·concrete. · dye carpets, ,
.,.hose~ Jandfil1s and flP.cooJiDB ·-· t.Owera tn on refineries. · .
Water reclamation in some form
has been going on for a long time.
Irvine is the granddaddy of recla-
mation in California, setting an as
yet unrealized goal. in . the early
1960s of recycling all its sewage
water for non-potable uses. The
Irvine Ranch Water District u sUll
a leader, recenUy introducing re-
claimed water to office air-
conditioning systems.
Continued from At produced 1ocally·by clUes, :it"ts aJso.·.
In a larger sense, critics say that largely pollUcs-proof. ,.No one. can'
the process is expensive and may : take it away from us."' said Farle
ak ·. Hartling, water reuse coordinator of m e many water drinkers opt for the Sanitation Districts of.-1.at An.;..: the botUed variety or tum up their _,_ · ~ . , .. '· ?.:'·;;'" ··:•H
noses and say, ''Yuck!" 0~ a result. the uses ·of~~'.
But Paul Gagliardo of San Di-ultlplied ,. .. f.ckly eoo's Metropolitan Wastewater water have m · so 'i'!!'l 0 that health officials have. been Department believes that hJs city is scrambifng to keep up. New· 1'8'1· :
about to begin "pioneering a proc-lations should be completed this.:
ess • • • to get people comfortable year, said David Spath. cbief of the·:
with the idea of drinking treated division of drfn1dng' water with the
sewage." state Department. of_ Health ~~ California spews enough sewage Ices. ,_. .• · · · · · t:, · · ..
into the ocean to meet a third to a The rules are expected tO · s0on
half of the state's urban water eliminate one of the ironies of this
needs, Gagliardo said emerging ~~...a~lys its-~.:... Be is among a small group of caUon as a wu.aiuuua waste. , ·
zealots who dream of a future in Until then. plant workers must fill
which Californians drink sewage, out lengthy reports when they spill
processed to levels similar to bot-reclafmed water, even if it is drink··
Ued water. : Ing water quality. .-' .
Those views are shared by cru-· · Desptte the regulatory confusion.
saders such as Santa Rosa organic recycled water ts beJng used· in· a :
farmer Lawrence Jaffe, who sells numberOfways. ·
vegetables nourished with recy-lthasbeenproposedasasourceof:
cled water using the slogan, "Close I water to do la1Dldry at San Quentin
the loop.'' and Bahman Sheikh, a · Prison. It is even being pumped:
San Francisco consultant who likes under the sea floor off U>ng Beach
to make the point by gulping down to keep the harbor area from sinking.
a long, cool glass of tertiary efflu-due to oil extraction. The oil compa-
enl Dies have used tap water far this "There is no reason to Oush purpose-enough to supply· 20,000
toilets with pure water from Mono 1 people with water for a year-but
Basin," Shei~ said. · are switcbfng to ~ed ~ter.
The surge m water recycling has I · ·
been propelled by improvements in
technology, regulatory changes
and a new crap of government
subsidies for reclamation systems.
Today, Califqrnia uses more than
450,000 acre-feet of reclaimed wa.
ter annually. That is equal to about
one-and-a-half Castaic Lakes. or
the water consumed bv two.thirds
,..! T.~~ ..\!'l'£'1{'~ iP. i1 •;t>,"r
SU~ IM /\.t.11 .. -~·b~ ~ ~ ·---· . ....... . "' .... r ~·181=~~.· .. .l entsiwer imf=uWltieS~ ·. . ·imd in' the1Ue af Smr ~..-..9·TJietr:eDg1neen FranciscD, UIUA~dual'"'~·· •::.'if':....a • are taking on · · ~ .. can-_....,. acre-feet~tiii~-1 ·~..we of .. ~~ ·~ · ~--· ·.:ctm•'"tlonil· per~.·~ .· ......... _ .measure of~.-•. ~ .. ,. . .. . ·. · ·1n short, water see Wa&te water. m1-.·····~:ana -~.~ft.!t~e~~~· , ~.-.:. ,~~: • .... ti):t_Jfi". • •••••
: Once cbfeDY aJi • o{.~
aewage, zeclaimed water is.~ over to the other side of tbe ledger."
saldlaiGarda, ~Of environ• ment8l services 'for San Jose. whicll
p1ans to divert nearr,· 4Q~· of its
sewage stream to water supplies in
cxm:dDg ye&rlL-. f)'·!:'t· ~ :" ···~~ :~'£ .. : ~ . . ,' .
· · The West Basin Municipal Water
DJstdct, which seives cmmmmities
from West llollywood to Palos Vet·
des &dates, bari made water· recy-
cllng Qle ~ of its plan to cut
'dependence OD iiDparted water in
half over the nm 3> years, largely
by converting tJie regloil'if water-I
hungry on refineries to· recycled · water~.··~. r _ :~·-~ii;:.~: ~ .. ;·j '~ Til ':'~~-. ~ .. ~~·.: .. :.
·.:-The purest of West Basin's recy-. C1ed water.is being injected into the
pound· to profect drinking water ·
supplies from seeping seawater. The
pJan will simultaneously cut seV!8P
·dischargeintothebay2li9':-:-·• ~
. San Diego leads the state. Officials .
decided to convert waste into drink-
ing water after court rulings forced
the city to better treat its sewage to
protect the ocean. The result is
water similar to what most people
would consider good for a swimming
lake.
Rather than dump that water
back into the ocean, San Diego has
designed a $150-million system to
add another level of treaunent.
bring the water up to the quality of
extra-pure tap water, and pmnp it to
the city's San Vicente drinking
water reservoir.
The water will be mixed into
imported water supplies, comprising
up to 10% of the supply by 2001.
11lt's a very significant step," said
Ken Weinberg, water resources
supervisor for the San Diego
County Water Authority ... We are
creating a new source of water."
The technology for recycled wa-
ter has developed to where San
Diego's water will supposedly be 10
times purer than tap water, Gagliar-
do said
State health officials have already
approved San Diego's plan. develop-
tug a new set of guidelines for the
purpose because none exist The
water will be rme to drink, they say.
The only worry is breakdowns in
the system. so duplicate safeguards
have been built in. Spath said.
So far, U1c project has been more
controversial because of its high cost
than because of health concerns.
San Diego officials estimate that it
will cost about S600 per acre-foot
to produce drinking water from
waste water, about 30% higher than
the cost of purchasing water from
the Metropolitan Water District
They acknowledge that figure is
fuzzy, however, because it includes
federal subsidies and is counted
against current sewage treatment
costs.
·And some San Diegans contend
. that it would be better spent on
developing other water solll'Ces: "If
you are willing to spend that kind of
money, you could fiood the city of ,
San Diego:• said Elmer Keen, a 1
retired geographer and critic of the :
project I
"It's a delicate balance," said 1
Steve Kasower, water· recycling
specialist with the state Water Re-sources Board. "It's important the
public understands this and doesn't
get upset by fear-mongers .•.• ·
But, dirty or clean, water is just
molecules of '1!?,0 with stuff floating
between them. I
Public acceptance for water recy-~
cling is not without precedent
I n Northern Virginia. a sewage
utility has been treating waste
water \SO that it meets drinking
water standards for 20 years and
releasing it into the Occoquan Res-
ervoir in an unusual project similar
to what San Diego plans. No health
problems have been reported. I
At the mmt advanced sewage :
treatment facilities today, utilities I
empl:>y reverse osmosis and micro-mters. devices that involve pressing
water through microsccpic mem-
branes, similar to what is used at
baWed water companies such as
Arrowhead Water. Els~here in the 'state, environ-
mental regulation has also spurred
new efforts at reclamation.
San Jose is-one example. The city
is under pressure· to reduce the
sewage it dumps into South . San
Francisco Bay, not because the
discharge is poisomng anything, but
because it is so high quality that it is
converting natural saltwater
marshes into freshwater ones.
"In effect, the water is too clean,''
said Steven Ritchie · of the San
Francisco Public Utilities Commis-
sion.
But supporters counter that the :
cost of recycled water. although !
expensive, is still far less than the .
cost of desalinating water or build-·
ing dams. "It's competitive in my
book when compared to other new
sources," said Peter MacLaggan,
executive director of the Water
Reuse Assn. of California. ' with bullrushes springing up in
San Diego officials are keenly the bay where pickleweed
aware of how easily public percep-once grew, and pressure mounting
lion of the project could go awry. to do something to help endangered
"This issue:· said one advocate. Dr. saltwater species, it was only a
Rosemarie Marshall Johnson, "gets matter of time before cities like San
everybody in a very personal way." Jose came to view their sewage as
Please see WATER. A19 an enticing supply of freshwater
WATER
Continued from A18
The city conducted focus groups
to test monikers for the water, and
ultimately clime ,.repurified" over
.. recycled," which. it seems, left too
much to the imagination.
Outreach to commlDlity groups
came next, with officials gin-
gerly pointing out that the city's
existing water source. drawn from
the Colorado River, contains sewage
that has been treated and dis-
charged by cities upriver, such as
Las Vegas. Across the state, similar public
relations efforts are underway, with
water agencies gently seeking to tell
the public that they are using a new
source of water that's quite close to
home. .. All water has gone through
countless other organisms before it
gets to us," said Hartling. "Dino-
sams. fish, humans-some a lot I
more recently than we would like to 1
think." I
·Ritchie said. '
San Jose now has a $140-million
reclamation system under construc-
tion that will deliver reclaimed wa-
ter to parks, fanns and industries in
Silicon Valley, said Garcia, the city's
environmental services director.
Some areas are even using re-
claimed sewage water to upgrade
the purity of their conventional
water supplies.
Monterey Regional Water Pollu-
tion Control Agency will unveil a
$'15-million project next month that
will free farmers from dependence·
on wells that have grown too salty
Since statewide more than t.hr~
quarters of urban water is used for
things other than drinking, the most
optimistic activists predict that
someday 20%, or even 40%, would
come from treated waste.
"Toilet to tap" is the phrase that
they use to denote a futuristic
urban environment in which treated
waste water would be transferred
directly to drinklllg water pipes.
Such a system would require new
technology to instantaneously de-
tect germs in treated water. But
some reclamation enthusiasts still
see it as inevitable.
The very thought seems to make
Spath. of the state health depart-
ment, uncomfortable. "The time for
that is not now, I will tell you that,"
he said. Even the strongest advocates
sense that the quick tmnover of
water from sewers to faw:ets may
be a bit too dicey to win wide public
acceptance.
'1 forbid you to print this," said
Orange County reclamation advo-
cate and farmer Charles Peltzer,
while expounding ideas for mixing
reclaimed water into public drinking
water. 1'The public isn't ready to
hear it."
Already, one water recycling plan
has nm afoul of the public: Three
years ago, the Upper San Gabriel
Valley Municipal Water Dmrict was
forced to scale back a plan •to
replenish ground water with recy-
cled water because Miller Brewing
Co. voiced fears that the project
might taint its nearby wells.
Other attempts to gauge public
reaction have shown confilcting re-
sults. A few years ago in Denver,
water agency officials conducted
focus groups to find out how the
public might feel about ~
waste water for drinking. They
found to their surprise that many
people would rather not think too
much about where their water
comes from. ''They wanted us to just
get on with it." said Jane F.arle, of
Denver Water.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
NAME OF PAPER SECTION SUBJECT
J~ A ~td~ PAGE
L.A. Mayor Steps
Into Owens Valley,
Long-Running Feud
• Water: Protesters tum out for his
arrival. The city of Los Angeles and air
quality officials there remain at odds over
how to proceed with the dry lake bed.
By JIM NEWTON
TIMES STAFF WRITER
INDEPENDENCE, Calif.-Los Angeles Mayor
Richard Riordan waded directly into his city's oldest,
most passionate feud Wednesday, joining a group of
local leaders on a trip to the Owens Valley, the farming
community Riordan's predecessors stealthily bled dry
of water a century ago so that they might build a
modern city.
So long and bitter has the dispute been that
Riordan's appearance Wednesday marked the first ;
time that a Los Angeles mayor has visited the Inyo
County seat since the construction of the aqueduct·
that formed the basis of the rifl That aqueduct was
completed in 1913, forever transforming the city that
got the water and the valley that lost il
So determined has Los Angeles' effort been to dry
the Owens Valley and bring the water south that dust
clouds now pollute the air and frighten the residents
who remain. The dust blows off what once was Owens
Lake but now is a dry lake bed covering 110 square
miles.
The Los Angeles officials also got helicopter views
of the vall~Y. . apd the major DWP projects in it,
including the long, broad stretch of the dry lake bed, a
desiccated reminder of the water that used to pool at
the end of the Owens River.
But the day was not just a social occasion or an aerial
tour for the mayor. The city of Los Angeles and the air
quality officials in Owens Valley remain at odds over
how to proceed with the dry lake bed, and. Riordan
used his visit to sound out his counterparts about the
problem and recommendations for how to cure il
So far, the two sides appear far apart. Air quality
officials have proposed a variety of measures to knock
down the dust in a 35-square-mile area of the lake. All
told, those measures would require the city to give up
i Please see WATER, A18
/)If ,Cli_ V VI-_
' .--
i
WATER: Protests Greet Riordan in Owens Valley
Continued from A1
· 51,000 acre-feet of water annually,
about one-seventh of Los Angeles'
total draw from the Owens Valley.
City officials are concerned that
those estimates are based on ques-
tionable research and have not
agreed to the req1:1est.. ·
The proprietary quality of that
besitattoµ is based on something
more than just what the:law calls
"water rights." · ,
At the aqueduct's christening,
William Mulholland, the legendary·
Department of Water and Power
chief, turned to the mayor of Los
Angeles as the water streamed
down the canal and said: "There it
is. Taite it."
Los Angeles has taken that wa-
ter ever since,. so it. was· not
surprising that· ~iordan's welcome
in the Owens Valley drew some
testy reactions. Several dozen pro-
testers gathered for his arrival,
politely but impatiently awaiting
the man wbose office represents
the w-ter empire they detest.
Some carried signs deriding "King
Riordan." .
'1've seen a lot of devastation, a
lot," said 66-year-old Stan Matlick,
who, like his father and grand-
father before him, has fought the
DWP. Like many who gathered '·
Wednesday, he complained that holdings. Working with a few lo-the air.
the water department's power in cals, the DWP secr~tly bought up Several residents said the dust is
the valley is so all-encompassing it land and withdrew it from agricul-a serious health hazard. Ann Capo-
has made residents feel as if they t~al production. . . danno, who has lived in the valley
live in a colony of Los Angeles. . When residents caught on, the: for more than 30 years, complained
·1 don't like these people," Ma-battle·was joined. It unfolded over of sinus problems. Vernon Rea, a
tlick said of the DWP. "I don't like decades, peaking in extraordinary . five-year resident, said he has
their tactics." bursts of intensity and violence. · · start~d gettjng ·summer colds. Oth-
The crowd chanted and waved There was the Owens ·valley ers expressed alarm at studies
signs as the van carrying Riordan lawman who shook down the Los showing ar~enic and cadmium in
approached. But the mayor de-Angeles city clerk buying up land the dust.
fleeted the group's anger. Moments · ·and water rights. There was the In fact, Rea carried a sign ad-
. after arriving, he crossed under a near-lynching of one man who ·dressed to the mayor: !'King Rior-
barricade erected to keep the dem-worked behind the scenes for the dan. Add a little arsenic and cad-
pnstrators out of a private bar-city of Los Angeles: And in 1924, JDlum to that barbecue sauce to get
becue party. He took a few ques-there was the series of dynamite authentic Owens Lake taste."
tions, got a short lecture from one blasta 'that ripped holes in the Spying the sign, Riordan yelled
· man ·and ~greed with the demon-aqueduct carrying water from the ·to the crowd: ''What I want to
strators that. it was important to valley to the city and that launched know iS who promoted me to
11work out a solution to some of the· . an insurrection among valley resi-king?'~ ·
many legitimate gripes that people · dents. . · The visit by· the mayor was
have here." . That particular chapter ended largely social. Along with City
· Joking with one protester, a oiµy after an armed confrontation Council President John Ferraro,
reUred DWP worker; Riordan said: was narrowly averted. · council members Ruth Galanter
"J've got bad news for you. Your Throughout, Los Angel~ lead-· and Cindy Miscikowski and oth~r
pension program is being looked ers have remained steadfast-Mui-. Los Angeles officials, the mayor
al" . , holland for". the ·rest of his life· hobnobbed with Owens Valley dig-
The roots of this struggle' date to referred to Owens Vall~y r~sidents nitaries at the Eastern California
1904, when Los Angeles leaders-·as "dynami~ers." The city lead~r~ Museum, where he snook hands
on Mulholland's advice-began have never wavered from their . and made small talk with. local
eyeing the Owens Valley as a · insistence that the· water is more . sui)ervisors, air quality officials,
water source for the city and badly need~ for Los ~geles resi-.
1
81\d others.
particularly the San Fernando Val-·dents than valley farmers. ; ,...· ----!'.---~-----
ley, where some of those leaders · When the wind blows up the -
ow~ed considerable real est~te .. valley, as it was doing Wednesday
afternoon, particles sometimes
kick up off the lake bed and ·c1oud
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
SUBJECT NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE DATE ~(7-'L/1'7 ..
fYlJ:;tJy
..
xaJ~~ ~
Using Water Reclaiit;ted FrOm Sewage
aRe .. ReclaimedWasteWaterMay allows; raises the possibility of·
Ease State's Thirst," Aug. 17: · involuntary exposure to barinful
I was portrayed as one of the bacteria or other pathogens. Add-.
"crusaders" for increased use of Ing reclaimed sewage water to our
recycled water and as making .. the aquifers and reservoirs without
point by gulping down a· long, cool stifficient, fail-safe· treatment and
glass of tertiary effluent" While continual monitoring for viruses
the point is exactly correct, the puts our scarce water supplies and
imagery is misleading. I would gulp our health at aJJ. unacceptable risk.
down tertiary effluent to demon-The addition of significant
strate my confidence in its safety-amounts of recycled waste water to
if pressed to do so. However, I also our fresh water supplies results in
would point out that tertiary efflu.. elevated levels of total dissolved
ent is not quite at the quality level solids. Such salty or hard water
·for everyday drinking purposes. may increase one's plumbing repair
Water recycling agencies .-outtnely · costs ~d necessitate the ·use of
alert the public not to drink from · larger amounts of detergents. Wa-
sources of recycled water. ter with high salt content may also·
It is possible and· economically adversely affect one's health and
feasible to bring the water up to a garden. Segregating reclaimed
potable level of quality with addl-sewage water from fresh or potable
tlonal treatment-as correctly supplies with a double-piping sys-
pointed out in the article. That tem, while costly, is the better way
elixir I would gulp down in a long, to go.
cool glass at the drop of the pro-· ELLEN STERN HARRIS verbial hat. · Fund for the Environment
. BAHMAN SHEIKH PhD, PE Beverly Hills
San Francisco : • It's fantastic that water agencies
technology work well
I. think they are toO concerned ·
. that the public is not ready for this.
Eighty percent of the complaints
will come from 20% of the people.
rd bet the other 80% of us have the
common. sense to see that
reclahned or .. repurified" water is.~ . good·thlng. . ..
JOHN DELANEY Aliso Viejo
• The use of reclaimed sewage are making this important
water for industrial applications · J.
and for irrigating golf courses,
freeway landscapes and appropri-
ate crops is certainly to be com-
mended. However, using inade-
qua~ely tr~ated and poorly
momtored recycled·waste water for .
potable purposes is quite another·
matter. · ..
Placing such water in air condl-
tio~g sys~. as California now
Sure~~
• Three things are for sure:
death, taxes and no mean-
ingful campaign finance
reform.
KEN JOHNSON
Pinon Hills
.· .·· .. j I .. , , ..
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE
L-A /fl t~Al S Bl
Water Importation:
Tide to Keep Rising
• Public works: Job
growth, development to
raise over all demand 30%
by 2020, Orange County
Water District projects.
Rate increases likely.
By SHELBY GRAD
TIMES STAFF WRITER
Orange County's reliance on
expensive imported water is ex-
-pected to increase significantly
over the next 20 years, raising the
prospect of higher bills for con-
sumers and prompting officials to
seek new sources of less-costly
local ground water.
Job growth and new residential
developments across the county
should increase overall water de-
mand by 30% by 2020, according
to new estimates by the Orange
County Water District.
But because local water sup-
plies are limited, the district pre-
dicts that use of imported water
from the Colorado River, North-
ern California and elsewhere will
jump by at least 37% over the
same period.
These projections trouble some
officials, who note that imported
water costs twice as much as
tapping local supplies and is a less
dependable a source.
"It goes beyond cost to a ques-
tion of reliability," said Wes Ban-
nister, president of the Orange
County Water District "If we had
a major earthquake that shuts the
California Aqueduct down for six
months or had a major drought,
what would we do?"
Most of the cities in northern
and central Orange County get
50%. to 70% of their water from
the ground and import the rest
But South County has far less
ground water and thus must rely
more heavily on importation.
Local water agencies hope to
reduce their reliance on imported
water by drilling dozens of new
wells, at a cost of more than
$30 million. They are also consid-
ering much more expensive plans
to build a new water reclamation
plant and make a variety of
improvements to the county's
waterworks.
All this comes at the height of a
bitter water war between San
Diego County and the Metropoli-
tan Water District, which sup-
plies Southern California-and
Orange County-with much of its
imported water. ··1~
San Diego wants to.reouce its
reliance on the MWD by pur-
chasii:tg water from Imperial
County. MWD opposes the plan,
saying that if San Diego buys less
from the MWD, and consequently
begins paying less of the pumping
and other transmission costs, it
will result in higher water rates
for other MWD customers in
Southern California, including
those in Orange County. ·
Pleue see WATER, B6
DATE SUBJECT a--zs ~tti V{CLIC-Y--_ C\-Sr" po<Z..:, T toYL-
86 R MO!'filAY. AUGUS.1.'.25, 1997
ORANG
Photce by KEVIN P. CASEY I Loe Angde11 'limes
A reflection is cast in treated waste water during a clarification proc-
ess at an Orange County Water District plant in Fountain Valley.
WATER
Continued from Bl ,
The MWD is also under pressure
from the federal government to
reduce the amount of water it takes
from the Colorado-River, a devel-
opment that might reduce the
amount of water available to
Orange County. .
''We are looking for _any oppor-
tunities we can to increase our use
of local ground water," said Ronald
E. Young, general manager of the
Irvine Ranch Water District,
which is drilling ~ new wells
this year . alone. "By its nature,
ground water is very reliable. It's
tbere in times of drought."
The projected surge in demand
·over the next 20 years· comes after
water use in Orange County actu-
. ally dropped by nearly 10% earlier
in the decade. Officials attributed.
the dip to the drought and eco-
nomic recession of the ear1y·1990s.
But since 1993, water use is up
16%, and the Orange County Wa-
ter District predicts a further 30%
increase by 2020 because of new .
growth. .
To meet the rising demand,
. northern and central county water
agencies plan to increase ground
.. water production from 70% of
capacity today to 75% by 2020. The
. effort will require more than two
dozen new wells, and experts still
aren't sure if the goal can be met.
~'It's still a q1:1estton whether we . can pump that much water out of
the basin,'' said William R. Mills Jr., general manager of the~· ·
County Water District.· "Our 'first· .1
indications are that this is doabie.
But we will have to wait and see."
· Even with the cost's of the new:
wt'lls and other improvements,
Mills said ground water pumping
will still cost far less than importa-
tion or other options, such as
desalinization of ocean water.
In 2000, the Orange County Wa-
ter District estimates that an acre-
foot of ground water will cost $182,
compared with at least $468 for
imported water and. more .than
· $1,200 for desalinized water. An
acre-foot is 324,000 gallons,
enough to supply the needs of two
families for a year. ·
Officials also hope · to bolster
local water supplies by building a
new reclamation facility that
would treat waste water. Some of
the recycled· water would be
pumped into the Santa Ana River
as part of a recharging process
designed to increase the county's
ground water supply as river water
filters down through the riverbed
and holding ponds into the aquifer.
The (ll'St phase of this reclamation
project would cost about $240 mil-
lion.
The Orange Cow:ity Water Dis-
trict has not yet come up with
estimates of how water rates will
change over the next 20 years. But
officials have expressed concerns
about a proposal by the MWD that
would increase water charps to
areas like Orange County t.hit are
experiencing growth in. water d.e-
mand .' ... · · ·
Acc0rding· io an Orange County
Water District report, the cost of
imported water from the MWD
could rise as much as 35%. The
MWD would use the extra revenue
to pay for infrastructure improve-
ments needed to accommodate re-gional growth.
.But MWD officials insist that
they haven't decided how to apply
so-called "new demand charges''
and that customers prob~bly won't
· see sharp increases in their water
bills.
'1 don't think you will see that
: kind of impact on waie.-rates," said
Brian Thomas, . assistant · chief of
planning and resources for the
MWD. "Our 10-year forecast
·shows that rates should remain ; pretty flal" .
Thomas, however, said that.
Orange County residents might
·take a modest ·hit if San Diego
. County is successful in receiving
water from Imperial County and
reduces the amount it pays to the
MWD . . .
Average monthly residential
water bills range from less
than $14 in .Irvine and Garden
Grove to more than $35 in some
South County communities such as·
Lagiina Beach and Trabuco Can-
yon, according to a 1~ survey by
Black & Veatch.
Anaheim's average monthly wa-
ter bill is $21.87, while Santa An~'s
is $18.23. By contrast, Los Angeles
·bills average $24.69 a month,
Riverside $10.90 and San l)iego
$24.49.
The p~h to reduce reliance on
imported water ·is also driven by
more than concem about cost.
Huntington Beach's water de-
partment ls just completing a $43-·
million waterworks upgrade that
: adds three wells and millions of
·gallons of extra reservoir capacity.
Linda Daily, a senior analyst with·
the city, said the additional reser-
; voir should give the city a decent
I supply of watei: in case wells and
: pipes are damaged during an
: earthquake. . ·
"We could have a situation in
which we will have to live with
what is within our reach," she said
~.
ti
-\ i
-9. ~ ;?
,c:; ii c
L') $
z
ry ~1 G: I ~ ITi -~ Zc-; me lj~c
CD (,/J Z
-o~
'3::· I)> -< lJ= c "'O (J;
"l t S:l ~
("')= ,. <:::. -)> ~ -0 _, \\ ..,., --uo ~ Zz \v G)Ci
"\) \ en Ci5
-i
g'' ~ s: () a _,
en
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS
NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE
LA fl /rJ e.!J I> 3
Water Panel Won't
.Go With the Flow
· • Government: Tri-cities district has been deemed
unneeded, but its board opposes a proposal to dissolve it
By DAVID REYES
TIMES STAFF WRITER
SAN CLEMENTE-The sentl-
.. ment was widespread: A small wa-
ter district in South County with
overlapping jurisdiction had be-
come impractical. It was deemed an
unnecessary layer of government.
So the grand jury recommended
consolidating the Trt-aues Mu-
nicipal Water District with another
agency.
"Ninety-nine percent of their
customers want them to go away,"
said James Holloway, San Cle-
mente community development di-
rector. "Their own in-house com-
mittee recommended
· consolldatiqn, and Ute city and
[neighboring) Coastal· Municipal
Water Dlstri:ct want them to go
away."
Although perhaps harsh. the an-
.ti-government attitude was
spawned in the aftermath of
Orange County's bankruptcy, a
•A consolldatlon Is maybe
you eliminate one or two
boards by forming only .
one district. Dlssolutlon
Is doing away with the
district entirely and
giving the alsets away.
My objection Is that when
you dissolve the district,
$35 million In assets and
$2.5 mllllon In relerves
go to the city of San
Clemente.'
JAMES LAWSON
. Member of the Tri-Cities Municipal water DJstl'lct
Ume when a series of recommen-
dations targeted the county's mul·
tllayered special districts handling
everything from sanitatlon to· li·
braries.
The grand jury urged stream·
lining to make government more
efficient. In an era of rapidly rising
water rates. consumers are paying
too much for water, partly because
of government inefficiency, the
county panel found.
Tri-QUes, which operates on a
S13-million annual budget,
owns a pipeline and serves about
'10.000 customers as an intermedi-
ary in the county's water-delivery
system. It wholesales water to
local districts and the· city of San
Clemente, which has its own water
department. .
The agency only has abOut. three
field employees and it hires outside
cansultants for management, pub-
llc relations and accounting. .
So what is happening to Tri-Cit·
ies? The county's Local Agency
Formation Commission voted Aug.
5 to dissolve the :n ~year-old water
agency, but Tri-Cities board mem-
bers have vowed to fight.
"It's much more politics than
anything," said James Lawson. a
retired UC Irvine director of archi·
tecture and c:onstruct.Jon. and 11·
year member of the Tri-Cities board. .• .
Lawson wants Tri-Qties to ap-
. peal LAFCO's decision and, if the
appeal fails, me a lawsuit aiming to
put the issue before voters.
"You know, the recommenda-
tions made for Tri-Cities were to
consolidate, not dissolve," Lawson
said. "A consolidation is maybe you
elimihate one or two boards by ·
forming only one district. DlBsolu-
tion is doing away with the district.
entirely and giving the assets
away. My objection is that when
you disso!ve the district, $35 mil-
lion in assets and $2.5 million in
reserves go to the city of San
Clemente."
DATE 8/~(;/1?
Dana M. Smith. LAFCO's s-
ecutiVe officer, who bas had
experience With mergers, consoli-
datlons and dissolving districts,
said such procedures are never
easy.
"It's so hard. And when the bell
is rung, usually it's the directors
who don't want to go away, and
that's what you have here,'' Smith
said. '-rhere is no other overlap-
ping district ln Orange
County... • • • Their own clients
med the request far them to. be
dissolved."
In recommending dissolution to
LAFCO commissioners, Smith
cited cost reductions of $363,700 to
$476.200 should the agency be
operated by San Clemente.
Lawson said Tri-Citles' oppomtion
isn't a matter of board members
feeding their egos but of anger that
assets from the regional agency
must be turned over to a city.
In addition, Tri-Citles counters
Smith's cost-saving figures with an
esUmate that taxpayers would save
only about $15,000. (In her r~
mendatlon, Smith did note that a
loss of $266,000 in property tax
revenue from Tri-Cities customers
in San Diego County would reduce
overall savings.)
The Tri-Citles service area in-
cludes the San. Onofre Nuclear
Generatlng Statton and state parks
in north San Diego County.
While LAFCO has approved
the dissolution of Tri-Citles
and designated San Clemente as
the successor agency, lt will be at
least 60 days before the issue is
taken up by the Orange County
Board of Supervisors, Smith said.
''We're eliminatlng a layer of
government that is unnecessary
and there are substantlal cost sav-
ings that wW accrue to taxpayers,"
Smith said. "San Clemente will
take over its responsibility because
it's bigger and can handle the
additlonal load."
As for Lawson, he fears that San
Clemente may use Tri-Citles' re-
serves to help the cash-strapped
municipality and not far water
projects as intended. But the city's
Holloway said that by law, the
money must go into a special fund
and cannot be used for the general
budgeL ·
"I want it to go to an electlon,"
Lawson said, "because as far as I'm
concerned, that will put their feet
to the fire and show everyone how
they divide up the assets."
SUBJECT
Ju.(lt,,~,