Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-07-30 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA July 23, 1997 NOTICE OF MEETING phone: JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS (7141 962- 411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS maifing nddresa: NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 PO.aove127 rw, Vanev.rn OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 92 z7zealzj Was address: WEDNESDAY, JULY 30. 1997 - 7:30 P.M. 10e44 aes Avenue Fountain Valle,C 927067019 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 108" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member A..n.iaa The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will CiPeS be held at the above location, time and date. Anabehm Brea / Buena Park Lypress Fount Fullerto orm C' Ci Fun t. Manbngtpn Beach e Bo r S tary bLa Habra v L.Palma Los Alemd" Newport Beach Orange Pna Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Santa s An ana Seaf Beach swea $teach Tustin Who Park PLANNING, DESIGN AND - Thursday,August 7, 1997, at 5:30 m. Yorbe Linda 9 P' CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE county or orange JOINT ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL - Tuesday,August 12, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. sanitary Districts WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT to be held at Orange County Water District costa Mesa COORDINATION COMMITTEE Garden Grove Midway cvj AD HOC COMMITTEE RE - Wednesday,August 13, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. Walter Disp9ees STRATEGIC PLAN Irvine Ranch STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday,August 27, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Commlued re Protecting we Environment 91nce 1954 a JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Joint Board Meeting August August 27, 1997 September September 24, 1997 October October 22, 1997 November November 19, 1997 December December 17, 1997 January January 28, 1998 February February 28, 1998 March March 25, 1998 April April 22, 1998 May May 27, 1998 June June 24, 1998 July July 29, 1998 August August 26, 1998 CSOOC 0 P.O. Box 8127 0 Foonlain Valley.C 9272e-9127 0 (714)962-2411 AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING JULY 30, 1997 — 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public !, inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. 1. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation 2. Roll Call 3. a. DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Seal Beach re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director, as follows: ('Mayor) Active Director Alternate Director George Brown Gwen Forsythe' 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 07/30197 6. The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Joint Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1- June 25, 1997 District 2- June 25, 1997 District 3- June 25, 1997 District 5- June 25, 1997 District 6- June 25, 1997 District 7- June 25, 1997 District 11-June 25, 1997 District 13- June 25, 1997 District 14- June 25, 1997 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District) ALL DISTRICTS 05/14/97 0528/97 MISC. Joint Operating Fund $ 394,580.99 $386,016.11 $50,669.43 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 3.286.351.21 355,312.70 58,364.94 Joint Working Capital Fund 138,089.17 580,675.28 17,688.37 Self-Funded Insurance Funds 0.00 93,582.37 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 1 225.00 10,076.48 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 2,772.50 35,027.51 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 11,137.42 547,342.87 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 27.15 13,382.87 0.00 DISTRICT NO.6 0.00 3,455.71 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 800.95 10,531.54 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 5,219.62 6,477.24 1,670.20 DISTRICT NO. 13 0.00 421.94 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 0.00 438.43 0.00 DISTRICTS NO. 5&6 0.00 498.40 0.00 DISTRICTS NO. 6&7 0.00 216.49 0.00 DISTRICTS NO. 7 & 14 0.00 17_18 0.00 $3.839.204.01 $2 043 472 53 $128.392.94 2 07/30/97 CONSENT CALENDAR: ITEM NO. 9 All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: 9. DISTRICT 2 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE PETITION RECEIVED FROM PHILLIP AND BARBARA JOUJON-ROCHE TO ANNEX .608 ACRES OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICTS IN THE VICINITY OF SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD AND MOHLER DRIVE IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF ANNEXATION OF SAID TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, (PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 78 JOUJON-ROCHE ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 97-29-2, initiating proceedings for Annexation No. 78—Joujon-Roche Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 3 07/30/97 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 11. a. Verbal report by Chair of Steering Committee re July 30,1997 meeting. b. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on June 25, 1997 to be filed. C. SEWER SERVICE CHARGES—PROPOSITION 218 (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize staff to execute the Proposition 218 Certification as required by the County of Orange 12. a. Verbal report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re July 2, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 2, 1997 to be filed. C. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. FOR PRIVATE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DISTRICTS'OXYGEN GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2: The Operations-Maintenance Department requests consideration from the Board of Directors to amend several terms and conditions of the original agreement for an estimated cost savings of$215,000 for each year of the remaining seven (7) years of the fifteen-year contract. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Authorize the General Manager to execute an amendment to the original agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the private operation and maintenance of the Districts'oxygen generation system at Plant No. 2, approved as to form by the Districts' Contracts/Purchasing Manager. 13. a. Verbal report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re July 3, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES— NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 3, 1997 to be filed. 4 07/30/97 7 ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 4) 13. c. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1 WITH COUCH BROS., INC. DBA COUCH &SONS, FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (Districts 3 and 11) The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 6 providing thirteen items of additional work and granting a time extension of 101 calendar days for completion of the additional work. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve Change Order No. 6 to Contract No. 11-17-1 with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich&Sons for an addition of $92,305.00 and 101 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $6,005,724.03. d. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO JOB NOS. P1411, P1413, P1-44, P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021 AND SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3, 4, AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1; SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON-STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 1; SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 1; REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS D THROUGH 0 AT PLANT NO. 2; SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON-STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO.2; SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 2; TUNNEL COVER REPLACEMENT AT BILLINGS TUNNEL AT PLANT NO.2; AND SLUDGE PIPING MODIFICATION AT PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS 6-15: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 1 providing eleven items of added and deleted work and granting a time extension of 37 days for completion of the added work. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P1-41, at al. with Margate Construction, for a deduction of$85,680.00 decreasing the total contract amount to$8,375,458.00, and an addition of 37 calendar days time extension. e. ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE(CDM) FOR JOB NOS. JAD-1 AND J40-2 RE PREPARATION OF PHASE 1 OF STRATEGIC PLANS(ALL DISTRICTS): The Director of Engineering requests approval of an Addendum to the PSA providing for additional work in three areas: (1) updating trunk sewer system information contained in the Districts' CASSWORKS data base, (2) development of pump station discharge curves, and (3) additional public, staff, and Board meeting support. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the PSA with CDM in the amount of$199,489 for a total amount not to exceed$1,958,717. 5 07/30/97 ALL DISTRICTS 14. a. Verbal report by Chair of Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee re July 9, 1997 meeting. b. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES—NO ACTION REQUIRED (Information only): The Chair will order the draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on July 9, 1997 to be filed. C. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 1997 (FAHR97-45) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of June 1997. d. ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 97-27, granting delegation of investment authority to the Director of Finance/Treasurer. e. DECLARATION OF DISTRICTS' OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICTS' EXISTING CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE OF, AND IN ANTICIPATION OF, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES, FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE INDEBTEDNESS ISSUE (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 97-28, declaring Districts' official intent to reimburse the Districts'existing capital reserve funds for certain expenditures made in advance of, and in anticipation of, capital improvement expenditures from proceeds of a future indebtedness issue. f. 1997-98 FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE UPDATE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE DISTRICTS' FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE VENDOR, JD EDWARDS, IN THE AMOUNT OF$55,384.87 (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the 1997-98 financial information software update and software maintenance agreement with the Districts' financial information software vendor, JD Edwards, in the amount of$55,384.87. 6 07/30/97 r ALL DISTRICTS—(Continued from page 6) 14. g. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT (All Districts): GSA staff requests approval of offering a computer financial assistance program to employees. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a computer financial assistance program to employees providing for a maximum loan of$3,000; 10% down payment; 24 months repayment period; interest rate at 5%; and aggregate maximum loan fund of $150,000.00. h. AUTHORIZE STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH R.W. BECK TO DEVELOP ASSUMPTIONS AND STRATEGIES TO IMPLEMENT A REPLACEMENT FUND FOR FIXED ASSETS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED$75,000 (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Directors authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with R.W. Beck to develop assumptions and strategies to implement a Replacement Fund for fixed assets for an amount not to exceed $75,000. 15. Annual election of Joint Chair(Nominee: Director John Collins); and, nomination and election of Vice Joint Chair. 16. DISTRICTS 7& 14 ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1, AND ABANDONMENT OF NINE DISTRICT NO. 7 PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 7-14 (Districts 7& 14) : RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Director of Engineering requests approval of Addendum No. 4 to the PSA providing for additional work for construction contract support services during the construction of Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1. 17. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS. P1-41, P1.43, P1-44, P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2, SP19950D21 and SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR PAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH FACILITIES TO PERMIT DISCHARGE OF EXCESS RECLAIMED WATER TO THE DISTRICTS' OCEAN OUTFALL SYSTEM TO BE FUNDED BY DISTRICT 5 (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests approval of Change Order No. 2 for construction costs for an increased amount not to exceed$197,299. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Authorize the General Manager to execute Change Order No. 2 for Job Nos. P1-41, P1-53, P1-44, P2-48, 132-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021 and SP19950059 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the Green Acres Project distribution system and the Districts' ocean outfall system for an amount not to exceed $197,299, to be funded by District 5; and, DISTRICT 5: 2. Approve District 5 funding of Change Order No. 2 for Job No. P2-48 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the Green Acres Project distribution system and the Sanitation Districts' ocean outfall system at a cost not to exceed $197,299. 7 07/30/97 18. ALL DISTRICTS CLOSED ES SSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chair may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Boards take final actions on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with Districts' Negotiator re pending MOU Labor Negotiations, Government Code Section 54957.6. 2. Confer with Districts' Management and General Counsel re appeals of termination of employees from investigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1), (2)). 3. Confer with Special Counsel re status of litigation, Louis Sangennano v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732680 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)). 4. Confer with General Counsel re status of litigation, Larry and Donna Anderson v. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 773598 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)). 5. (DISTRICT NO. 3) Confer with General Counsel to status of litigation, County Sanitation District No. 3 v. United Technologies Corporation, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 722816 (Government Code Section 54956.9(a)). b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 19. Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting 20. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 22. Adjournments 8 07/30/97 NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411, ext. 2026 H:\wp.dla\admin\BS\AG97\073097.doc 9 SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS'ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING (Date)—7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public '.. inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. .: '.. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item, or that there -: is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the _ posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to '.. the meeting date. '.. 21. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: a. DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 Consideration of motion authorizing consideration of Item 20.b. and c. listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). b. Verbal report of General Counsel C. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE, DAVID P. GATLIFF V.WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 779933 (Districts 5 and 6): Receive and file Summons and Complaint, David P. Gatliff, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 779933, in connection with Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Motion to: 1. Receive and file Summons and Complaint; and 2. Authorize the Districts'General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. H:%wp.dlatadminOS W G971W 3Msuppagenda.dw ME{NNO DATE: 07/30/97 TIME: 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1,2,3.5.6.7.11. 13 & 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS ILUTLI.............................MC DUIOAN..................� IHOLMBEROI....................ANDERSON............_..... (FERRY/SCHARM............FERRYMAN .................. (FORSYTHE).....................SHOWN....................... _ IDOONTO........................MURPHY......... IJONESI...........................CARROU. .................... IPOTTIH...........................SALTARELL.................. V IPEINIKINI.......................COLLINS...................... ISTEINERI........................SPTRER....................... MOYESTHOMSONI..........DEBAY........................ IBELL.............................DIMES......................... DISTRICT 2 MARMANI.......................DETTLOFF..................... IMAERTZWEILEW.............ECKEN IDDE.................. MOTBONI.......................OSNMWC................... ICOONRI........................MURPHY....................... ISMONOFFI.....................DUNLAP....................... (HOLMBERG)....................ANDERSON................... (MAIHI Z ILER).............ECKENRODE.................. IPETREINI.......................MUMS....................... IPERRY/SCHAFERI............FERRYMAN................... IBELU.............................DIMES.......................... IBROADWATEIS...............(EVES.......................... ISIMONOFFI.....................DUNLAP...................... IMAULLERI......................MARSHALL................... (BROADWATE(1...............LEYES......................... ILUTU.............................MC SUMAN.................. ILURI.............................MCGUMAN................... (WALKER)........................MMM BRADFORD......... IBANKHEAD)....................NOW......................... ICOONM........................MURPHY.......................JG ISTEINERI........................SPRZER....................... IBANKHEADI....................NOW.......... (SCHWIND)......................WEDAA........................ MEBAYI..........................NSVMI ....................... •� MALY)............................ZEMEL.......................... IEVANSI..........................HIM............................. IPOTTSI..........................SALTAAELL.................. DISTRICT 3 IWEDAAI........................SCHWIND..................... IEVANSI..........................RICE.............. .......... (HAMMOND)....................SN6A.�.A..................... .... _ — STEINERI.........................SPTREI....................... MOLMBEI........................AN ER SRAOFORD......... ISPITZEM...................I....WIENER...................... r IHOLMBER01....................BROWN.ON................... _ — (HARMANI.......................SULLIVAN...... IFONEYR.EI.....................BROWNL...................... _ — (MILLER)..........................SWAN.................... .... IJONESI...........................CARROLL...................... INETRI MOTSKIN).......................COLLINB....................... — — IJEMPSAI........................SYLVIWISDA ........................ IDOTSONI......................wBBNANtlE.................... (SCN W INOI......................Z WISDAA........................ ISIMONOTFI.....................DUNLAP....................... —_ IDalvl............................ZENEL.......................... IBROADWATEM...............LEVES.......................... _ IMAULLER)......................MARSIALL................... STAFF ILUTLI.............................MCDUIOAN.................. — MANKHEAUI....................NORBY......................... ISTEMERI........................SPRZER....................... ANDERSON......................� (HARMAN).......................SULLIVAN..................... HOUOES...... ...................�� IJEMPSAI........................SYLVIA........................ "a........... MALYI............................ZEMEL.......................... LINOOEfl............................ yN.//� LUW N.......................... I�'/�j�-'��^.��./ DISTRICT B MCWTYDOWN.RE....................... (NOVESC.........................OFBAV......................... OOTEN.RE....................... IDEBAVI..........................NOYES......................... STREW�.N..................... LJ7Wd i.//,•... (SPNZERI.......................�NWR1EF.......................� STREW.N...................... DISTRICTS WHEATIEY...................... `4 L„G6� (PERRYISCHAFERI............FERRYMAN................... ✓ WIUON........................... ISPRZERI........................9160,1606................ .. ............................. ,.aII^�^'L DHOMSONI.....................DEBAY................... ......................................_ �y_../ .�fJk,Gi� DISTRICT] ....................................._ Mons)...........................SALTARELU.................. ✓ OTHERS (HAMMOND)...................`BN6 .......................... //u�P�L /�N>LNBr`AL MOMSONI.....................DEDAY................... WOODRUFF..................... (PERRY/S.....I I............FERRYMAN................... ANDRUS mom............................. (Lurz)n)........................MURPHIAN................... KNo1F............................._ ICO(INR......................... MURPHY....................... LLEE INDS....OM....................._ (SPR2Efl1.......................'SIENIER'...................... LINDSIROM....................._ NIXON............................._ DISTRICT 11 SHAW............................. WARMAN)........................ISIS R:.................... STONE............................ NISTEINER). � SULLNAN..................... INE ........................................:.....SRTZEIi....................... DISTRICT 13 IsIMONOFFI.....................DUNLAP.................... ... IW ITZERI........................somme..................ISP 10DON O........................MURPvIElNHI:...................... IDOONRI........................MURPHV....................... DISTRICT 16 MAMMONDI.................. ...................... POTT .. . SALTARE L..L:MOORZ).......................M RRNV ISPR2ER1...................... EINSA .I.................................................... SW . . .AN H:WwP•dMMdMnW10MECTORWUM2 00124/97 PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/nRM Please Print Please Print T pvz c 4rK EsA d S JUL 28 '97 12:19 FR PI1 L56JRY MRDIRN 619 236 1995 TO 1714962OM6 P.02/03 OMCE OF CITY ATTORNEY PA Boz 190 20DO Mom Street GN HmWe Hunt a mn Brach, C9&wnia 9764E (rN StG s555 Pat(IR 374-Ift VIA FAX AND U.S.MAIL July 25, 1997 Patrick C. Shea,Esq. Pillsbury,Madison& Sumo,LLP 101 West Broadway,Suite 1900 San Diego,California 92101 Re: DISTRICT ATI'ORNEY/MERRILL LYNCH SE1IT.EMENT PROCEEDS Dear Mr. Shea: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach has directed that I communicate to you directly regarding the above matter on behalf of the City Attorney, Gail Hutton, who is currently on vacation. When Huntington Beach made a decision to execute the relevant banlauptcy-related agreements' with the County of Orange it did so based on the fact that the claims we assigned would be pursued vigorously by the Cou nty's civil attorneys and the District Attorney. The District Attorney's recent`settlement^ with Merrill Lynch operates.as a failure of consideration because the City of Huntington Beach had a reasonable expectation that the criminal investigation would be helpful in the civil action. That ctpectation has now been seriously impaired by the settlement,especially since the Grand Jury testimony may now be sealed,according to recent news reports. Moreover, every contract carries with it the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. `The Compreheovt'e Sdfl a tAge amt(CSAJ Plan ofAdjust=u Ageemem,M. ' JUL 29 •97 12: 19 FR PILLS9JRY MAD15014 619 236 1995 TO 17149628356 P.03/03 Patrick Shea, Esq. July 25, 1997 Page 2 Each party has a duty to refrain from actions which defeat or impair the reasonable expectations of the other party. The District Attomey's action in settling the civil causes of action with Merrill Lynch is a breach of such covenant of good faith and fair dealing because the evidence gathered may be unavailable in the civil action- On the other hand, the evidence in the County officials' criminal cases may be used against the County to Merrill Lynch's advantage. _ To further impair Huntington Beach's expected consideration in the Agreement with the County, we are now told that the Orange County C.E.O. has taken the position that the $30 million in"settlement proceeds"will=be distributed to the schools as set forth in the CSA. Failure on the pan of the County to distribute fords which are to be paid pursuant to an "Agreement of Settlement . . ." between the People of the Stan of California and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner& Smith" on "ell civil Causes of Action"is, in our view,a breach of the CSA. Please advise the undersigned of action you intend to take on behalf of the pool participants, including the City of Huntington Beach relative to the County C.E.O.'s position on the$30 million settlement proceeds. Also, kindly let me know if there is anything the City of Huntington Beach should do to assist in your efforts. Your prompt response would be greatly appreciated. very truly yours, ARTHUR DELALOZA Deputy City Attorney c: Grad Hutton,City Attorney Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Michael Uberuaga,City Administrator Ray Silver,Assistant City Administrator Scott Field,Deputy City Attorney xa TOTPL PAZE.e3 « 07/29/97 14:40 'S714 724 6045 CITY OF IRVINE LaJ0a2/002 3ULY 29, 1997 TO: THE HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF ORANGE FROM: PAUL BRADY,IR.,VICE CHAIRMAN ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL COADMTTEE _ It has come to my attention that the Board of Supervisors will be considering the proceeds of litigation as a result of the$30 million settlement in the Merrill Lynch case. I would respectfidly request that your Honorable Board find a way to accomplish what the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement(CSA)and the Plan of Adjustment sought to accomplish;namely,per the terms of these court approved documents,provide proceeds of litigation,including the Merrill Lynch settlement funds,to all of the Orange County investmem Pool(OCIP)investors,including am schools,special districts, cities,etc. The OCIP members, not just the cities,but all of us collectively,believe that the Board of Supervisors can and will pay back the$30 million to those of us who were injured by the 1994 County badwptcy. I would strongly recommend that the$30 million be delivered immediately to Mr.Tom Hayes. Vim Chairman Orange County Investment Pool Committee c: Orange County Investment Pool Committee Members Attorney Paul Glassman JUL 29 '97 16:43 FR PILLSBURY MRDISID! 619 236 1995 TO 17149620356 P.02/03 Pillsbury An "Ar uW IN W pYyApWAY wrTi IbO SAN IXrf.O.Wh'OpN1A R1YlfI19 'L �T�� iIIIliCP'E(619)33H000 fIJL 161QZ141Rf Kali In$ Sutro LLF Ww.saner dee)mu (619)5443177 Settlement Negotiation Materials PRIVILEGED AND NOT ADMISSIBLE CaBferma Evidence Code §1152 Federal Rule of Evidence §408 July 29, 1997 VIA FACSB[IILE & U.S. MAIL. (714 7ap59) Laurence M. Watson, Esq. Assistant County Counsel County of Orange 10 Civic Center Plaza, Room 404 P. O. Box 1379 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Re: County of Oranrre - Disposition of Proceeds of Orange County Dimct Attomey-Settlement with Merrill Lynch Dear Lon: I have been disappointed by the recent newspaper articles and other reports emanating from the County regarding the County's ref Beal to nun over the $30 million Merrill Lynch settlement proceeds to the Representative. The agreements between the County and the Pool Participants, and the provisions of the County's Plan of Adjustment, contemplate the distribution of these proceeds to Orange County schools, cities, special districts, and to the County, in accordance with and agreed upon distribution protocol. In particular, the definitions of Pool Related Claims and Litigation Proceeds square with the claims which were compromised under the Settlement Agreement with Merrill Lynch giving rise to the $30 million of proceeds. I have not been provided with any materials from any source suggesting a construction of these documents in a manner which would exclude these proceeds from the requirement that they be turned over to the Representative. Beyond that, any such attempted construction SAs tarn{(8 AVGnE H[W YOYR OM.YGE(WMY 1�MAhYIO SA.Y IRN14X0 514COH YALL£i WASNO#ION.OC 1[F1'CRl TORIO 1lfain0. JUL 29 '97 16:44 FR PILLSH RY MRDISON 619 236 1995 TO 17149620356 P.03/03 s Laurence Watson, Esq. July 29, 1997 Page 2 would be inconsistent with the benefits conveyed to the County by Pool Participants under the Comprehensible ScWcmem Agreement and Plan of Adjustment. I do not know of any mechanical reason why such a trmsfer cannot take place immediately, either as an appropriation by the Board, or alternatively, by stipulated Order between the County and the OCIP Committee submitted to U.S. Bankruptcy Judge John Ryan confirming the Merrill Lynch settlement as "Net Litigation Proceeds" under the County's "Plan." 1 would be happy to help facilitate that process, and will assure you of its prompt approval I would appreciate hearing from you regarding the County's legal position with respect to the Merrill Lynch settlement proceeds. I remain hopeful of a constructive resolution of this issue, however, the positions articulated by representatives of the County in the press have created a need for prompt clarification of the County's position Thank you for your courtesy in this matter. Very sincerely, Pat, riwmo. + TOTRL PR6E.03 06/23/1997 21:07 310-312-9507 PAUL R CLASSMLIN P.C. PAGE 02/10 ' PAUL R.GLASSMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 11400 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, 2N°FLOOR LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90064 PHONE:(310)3124MS FAX:(310)312.9507 June 23, 1997 To: All Orange County Cities In the Subcommittee of Orange County Cities("The Subcommittee") Re: In Re County of Orange Case No. SA-94-22272JR Settlement Between County o/Orange and Merrill Lynch Dear Counsel for Orange County CMes: As many of you have probably heard by now, the District Attorney for the County of Orange has entered Into a $30 million settlement with Merrill Lynch of potential criminal charges. As you may also be aware, the Pool Committee has made demand upon the County for payment of the $30 million as'11 igation proceeds' under the Plan. Attached for your information are copies of the following documents: 1. Press Release from the District Attomey's Office, dated June 19, 1997. 2. Settlement Agreement between the County and Merrill Lynch, June 17, 1997. 3. Letter from Pool Committee Counsel Pat Shea to the County's Bankruptcy Counsel, Bruce Bennett, dated June20,1997. 1 will be following up on developments with respect to the settlement and will be sending out a further report when I have more Information. If you have any questions conceming the settlement or any other matter, please do not hesitate to call me. � W./X_ , Paul R. Glassman P.C. Mitchell, Silberberg 6 Knupp PRG:cp a^99% 310 312 9501 06-23-97 09:07PU P002 421 06/23/1997 21:07 310-312-9507 PAUL R a-ASSMAN P.C. PAGE 03/10 _ avlvr 19:21 NO.= PM SENT Ml _ 8-19-97 ;10:S9AAI ;trfTgyIM t47t= Blur• 919194411414;9 21 a . DISTRICT ATTORNEY ORAW�C011Nfy.CA11F0lUUA UMHAa.1L CA►=Dl Mla ATTOMkV r�.«mLlrara ffi�A]iSEAB� raaaad r.wiw 7997 ,ra«w ar« rrrraear Oomacllaem: M1o1miRcapimi 014)04406 aeeualuw arar D4Mn AlhAev M3dmel R.Cenral anmmood bdgAM Mamll Lladltras .pw3u««cwu... apdbyq'Sw MlWmmapmlMlAulm aati.mam afPawdW dnT dais ty 13e PaopleofltaBlue of Onll(omia GadaaEdea�lLymhaetl� 1�n�voJlvh�rA.lya��xselBas:O(s�n4�e�Cmyeg�d�.6yla�Miytrp�bl lM...�IA MMWW M/.�rPVA l mE81 LYmAMA$mAlo impiemmllmaedmala�sr emdmddsy °."'«�. �m+>arfdpeae<m.11�,eI.=ainuK�n�aeet .la.t>ridie. y .. lSteaeafCaAAmda. Ampy otde eet9emoatageeamee6a9Arid btlaa media aam :r1.s. mri'r'rarwiiws Mw ML'Ww t hrlhupmida that MOM Lyhcb file MAMA a pm nw>w�.slaw w6ea allIDW6d>at6�tliaa abaaamYm9api mbUalKU bbap�aad, eaonfo:�aad ducbaed l�•ddpated'1DUdawncApt•rdA�Almfll .Ou..rrrw��r 16VA Tl8a8emmddw"Wkj11*Md5p&m it, lthben pmhd b*c nr Omw Cmao DEd wAlamq and Oa6(mala Aftmoy GomW m-1 bmUfrQwmw9rey«m. MwMLywb Im alter fags wtra«an«n n+aa� 7haoUan of a275 yam' .dttyana6 1y Cn Dltfeiat aae�rmMam A�r �ayC.meol mid 0lm®eCmN}r Camdhry itsa Ae «r aatl�Mbe afa099ye�.WBGmdn�ceL�Kaemaa aa6otp 6nmaal aymhdsp LM dadepigm othwhWmy LyOift4p cme y as ww `va�am. naandwo, LM r T>te aaalrmtaapery poNtW daaUL®a.banr lfmDl lJ'meS aNtb grua r ymyla ofdle lmb*fCAffwdaaad aha ma92ee.inru ww,say NNUM .�r rwww Pa�aYdrB Bdytle6D»t�lR ydmtMmL717a�10'ab'o01e9aI19. .m„�r.,«�. 1mNdlat tie Omtap'of Or®gerad alLepapd«I mLY1'1�. O'4wm IUN 19 '97 13:27 PQM-22 CB'd BS 01 IASWU4 Aa-GSTIId ?W TZ,LT L6, 6T Hlf a-97Y 310 312 9507 06-23-97 09:07PM P003 #21 Rb/28/1a97 21:07 310-312-9507 PAOL R GLASSM" P.C. PAGE 04/10 tm/I8i97 0831 NO.365 raR3 Aw Bri eLLlo-91� ;ID:SM ;)fj )OM AOM BEW- 01818141141a:1 !/ 8 w. w n m .�.+ .,.,� 7hej"mwi,aAwalett bldohsSl llUlbn bloaaoofn.ein bg rile DW Amaay WdAliaasy Omeml 1a ear&m &af®a llwa6UB & L PmmaQUO Ca.ay'Iwft aTaxCaaea.RobatLCtampw Vft d�Q mim0aimi � Nidr.fahfttb Polk Rnkmkmoaeg QuamIna=edaedm*lft Aaaataameem leetsau.afxaaidm. Ceom�ylaeReta4 to mo7�Snlba comb1W76r IorAapdr.lb+laler CaatJalaalSyea Caalp fa6med by bc�C�rayeCom�t6eed lfttW redeamMe40bP ahi�l lKa7 of fiw fun0'emmro aed bae allude/alll>atlom�rlb atmdtlm dung ,Mad 1d44imlrAef atPub+bLmlk Bdlwaamrts pablla fumb,mMMalnnaj fabc mats b!apabticltaard,apd tukin�b6a RatasdaMrievkkef 1�.drb ammly ledtga)M plveoeaaoe �ebr�Q Camllad p8taea D�and wiB b aasemd by� nmuNto.. fdeyaldraandadaaeftYal 1. 1wM DawWafMwA &WM SaeftR Wd&Rdriao 4Vw{ iod&W and abd mmWp ww"afmiap�nlplodaaotpblic faed aed f RM a b=l,%PalboU&&%inj 1997 aad loos WhM beaieljay bw tubbmat4adideiq,be DWnb a'" toada*lkydWrnr &W694M ofVd&mw&aM way Qbmambdlmeuet aftms ofmo Yam paw— o nwmd ma "tdolem olwmmmibmww by Lm 7bb*WtftMW)aff&dv*eoa 60Dlabia A>4mWs iaYgti sfim fala die aweq FKNMmetadaeplaj. Nr1N IlheYaaaT nw a .n ,rm 00'd 6I Ol 0 312YW A2ll105111d t!d T -23 91 6T Fill R�9'I% 310 312 960'i 06-23-9'! 09:0'f P2C P004 a21 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA pun n: July 24, 1997 (714)%2-2411 meYing Wd.: Ro.El.al 27 Fouman Valley,CA 92)26812) To the Members of the Boards of Directors meet aearese: 10044 Ellis avenue Fwmain Valley CA 92708-7019 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional information on any of them, please call me. Consolidation Bill Approved Member A,ruo8s On July 11, 1997, Governor Pete Wilson signed AS 769, which provides for a new • governing system for the consolidated Districts. The bill is effective January 1, 1998. dues The next step is to prepare an application and submit it to LAFCO. The Fxecutive Anaheim Committee will be meeting September 17, 1997 to continue review the Resolution of Bras Application to LAFCO. Buena Park Cypre Fountain Valley Fullerton Correspondence with SAWPA Huntington Bead Irvine Le Habra As you may recall, after many months of negotiating, agreement was finally reached La Palms on a new agreement with SAWPA that provides for the purchase of additional Los yporr each Capacity in the Districts' collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The attached Newport Beach P Orange letter dated July 16, 1997 from Neil Cline, outlines their position. Staff and General Placentia Counsel will continue discussions in the hopes that these issues ran be resolved. I Santa Allewill kee osted. Seel Beach P ou P Y Stamm glean Vila Park yorba❑nda The Districts at the Orange County Fair Daa.ty o1 Dranga An ultra-low-flush toilet, a 4'x6'working model of our plant, and a 50-gallon fish tank filled with live ocean specimens comprised the centerpiece of this year's booth at the soma, oisixict, Orange County Fair. The display was designed to educate (and entertain!) both Coats Mese children and adults on what happens to the wastewater they generate. The "working" careen Brae toilet, which was donated by the Metropolitan Water District of Orange County, was Midway City positioned on a 15-inch high, enclosed base that housed a recirculating water system. water Movies. Visitors to the booth could actually flush the toilet and follow the wastewater as it was lrvine Pouch processed through the plant and discharged into the ocean (as represented by the fish tank). The stylized model also included our central power generation facilities and a small golf course to depict two of the uses of reclaimed water. Our 10'x20' booth also included a marine monitoring display and information about our biosolids program. A Public Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment Since 1954 Members of the Boards of Directors Page 2 July 24, 1997 OuNall as an Artificial Reef "The Evolution of an Outfall as an Artificial Reef" is the newest addition to the Districts' informational brochures and handouts. Initiated by the Marine Monitoring staff and produced in-house by Graphic Services, the piece colorfully depicts how the discharge of improved, high-quality effluent has contributed to the recovery of the biological community near our outfall over the past twenty years. "The Evolution of an Outfall as an Artificial Reef"will be added to our public information packet, which was distributed at the Orange County Fair and will be given to our visitors following their plant tour. A copy is enclosed. If you would like additional copies, please call Cymantha Atkinson, Ext. 2056. Pricing Survey for Cationic and Anionic Polymer Marc Dubois, our Contracts/Purchasing Manager has completed a survey of both cationic and anionic polyelectrolyte chemical polymers. The survey data was compiled from a select group of public agencies with similar core businesses and consumption levels. After reviewing the attached chart, you will find that our pricing is favorable in comparison to other agencies with much high consumption levels and extremely competitive when compared with agencies of somewhat equal or lower consumption levels. If you have questions on this issue, please call Marc Dubois at Ext. 2650. Boise Chica State Beach Sanitation System Attached is a letter of appreciation from Jack Roggenbuck, District Superintendent for the State of California's Department of Parks and Recreation. Construction on this system should be completed next year. Biosolids Update: An alphabet soup of CNN, EIR and TSDC There is new public attention being directed toward biosolids. CNN's Money/ine recently broadcast a multiple part series on biosolids. Transcripts of the broadcasts are included along with responses from the Water Environment Federation. It is our opinion that CNN's reports were unbalanced and grossly misleading. The Regional Water Quality Control Board in Central California has been directed by the Superior Court to produce an Environmental Impact Report regarding the use of biosolids on agricultural land in the Central Valley of California. The Sanitation Districts and other wastewater treatment agencies in California will fund the EIR because no other funding source is available, because we have a vested interest in seeing the practice continue, and because we have a responsibility to be certain that Members of the Boards of Directors Page 3 July 24, 1997 seeing the practice continue, and because we have a responsibility to be certain that we are causing no harm. We will contribute $50,000 toward the preparation of an EIR expected to cost approximately$500,000. The attached July 11, 1997 memo outlines this issue. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control is revising California's system for identifying and regulating hazardous waste. TSDC proposes to define biosolids as a Managed Industrial Waste. Materials falling within this classification would not be permitted to be beneficially used unless an exemption was received by a wastewater treatment agency like ours. Otherwise, the material would have to be disposed in a lined landfill. California wastewater treatment agencies are working together to convince the TSDC to proceed cautiously so that beneficial reuse is not unintentionally impacted by regulations that are poorly written and thought out. A memo on this issue, dated July 16, is attached. Naturally,we are concerned about these three developments because all of the biosolids that we produce are beneficially reused by agriculture in full compliance with EPA requirements. We are convinced that reuse is being conducted safely here in California as well as the rest of the United States. It's important that the practice continue because it conserves landfill capacity and returns a valuable nutrient source to agricultural land. The data is quite clear: biosolids significantly improve agricultural productivity. EPA has established reuse regulations under Section 503 of the federal Clean Water Act. The standards appearing in the regulations were developed using very rigorous scientific and risk assessment methods. A team of scientists from agronomy, soils and public health fields worked together to establish conservatively set limits that protect the public and agricultural lands from adverse impacts. DARTBOARD I have included the July 1, 1997 issue of the DARTBOARD, which provides a progress report. County of Orange Bankruptcy Attached is a July 8, 1997 letter to the County's allomey withdrawing the settlement recommendation submitted by the attorney for the OCIP, and demanding that the County turn over the entire $30 million Merrill Lynch settlement. Also attached is a May 22, 1997 article entitled, "Orange County, California- One Year Latef', which was prepared by A. G. Edwards &Sons, Inc. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 4 July 24, 1997 District 7 Contract Sewer Maintenance Nick Arhontes, Maintenance Manager, reports that in January of this year, the District 7 Directors authorized GSA's Collection Facilities O&M Division to proceed with preparing detailed sewer maps for three District 7 areas. This was necessary in order to issue a Request for Proposal to outsource the"routine"cleaning of the small lines (12-inch and below) in these areas. At this time, maps of the Irvine Business Complex, within the City of Irvine, have been completed by a team consisting of Camp, Dresser& McKee Inc., Division 2540's Manager, and the Maintenance Planner, using digital data provided by the City of Irvine and IRWD. Detailed specifications, including the cleaning sequence, are being finalized and are expected to be forwarded to the Contracts/Purchasing Manager by July 15. Allowing for the advertise/bid/review/award cycle, a recommendation will be presented to the FAHR Committee for information and to the District 7 Directors for action in September. In addition, mapping work is proceeding on the two remaining areas of District 7; the City of Tustin, and the County's unincorporated areas north of Tustin as well as pockets in the City of Orange. This work required purchasing digital base map information from the County of Orange and the Public Facilities and Resources Departments' Survey Division. The County data, in the Intergraph format, was converted to the ARClnfo format by Forma Systems for use by CDM. The digital data was delivered to CDM on May 28. Copies of original construction record drawings are being utilized for developing the sewer overlay on the street, and the County is providing parcel data. The 90% review of the sewer maps for these two areas is scheduled for the second week in September. Delivery of the final product is set for early October. After that, the cleaning sequence can then be developed in approximately three weeks. Specifications and bid documents should be identical to those used for the Irvine Business Complex. Board action by District 7 Directors to award a contract is scheduled for December. The selected contractor(s)will be managed by Division 2450's Contract Administrator. If you have any questions on this project, please call Nick Arhontes at Ext. 3011. Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Proaect(OCRI Attached is a copy of a June 24, 1997 participation request letter to John Wodraska, General Manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, seeking their involvement in the development and funding of the OCR Project. As we reported in May, Mr. Wodraska attended a Joint OCR Cooperative Committee meeting and suggested that a request be submitted. Members of the Boards of Directors Page 5 July 24, 1997 Proposition 218 and the Newly Adopted User Fees Also attached is a response letter written by Judy Wilson supporting our actions re the newly adopted user fees. If you have any questions on this matter, please call Judy at Ext. 2005. "Whisky's for Drinkin'and Water is for Fighting About• This quote was made a century ago by Mark Twain, and is included in the attached article recently published in the Automobile Club of Southern California's July/August 1997 Avenues magazine. It's a good overview on water resources, including importation, reclamation, conservation and water banking. Published Articles of Interest Attached are 11 articles from various publications that you may find interesting. If you would like ur€fi(0 Lion on any of these items, please call me. Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt Attachments: July 16, 1997 Letter from SAWPA re Purchase of Additional Capacity OCSD Public Information brochure, 'The Evolution of an Outfall as an Artificial Reef' Polymer Pricing Survey Chart Letter of Appreciation re Bolsa Chica State Beach dated July 8, 1997 from Dept. of Parks and Recreation Information re CNN's Presentations on Biosolids—Hazardous Harvest July 1, 1997 DARTBOARD Letter dated July 8, 1997 re Merrill Lynch Settlement with County of Orange Letter to MWD dated June 24, 1997 re OCR Project Response Letter dated June 26, 1997 re Prop. 218 Article from ACSC's Avenues, "What About Water?', July-August 1997 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority COMMISSION FOR THE PROJECT AUTHORITY CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT SAWPA ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER July 16, 1997 NEIL M.CLINE Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Don, As we discussed at our meeting last month, it is SAWPA's intent to acquire two additional increments of 1.0 MGD treatment and disposal capacity in the CSDOC system, consistent with the current agreement between agencies. At your request, and as approved by the Commission, we will purchase 1.0 MGD for cash in the amount of$4,543,176.53. As you are aware, SAWPA is constructing an 8.0 MGD desalting plant in the lower Chino Basin utilizing low interest loans from the Federal Government and the State of California. The plant will require treatment and disposal capacity for brine reject produced by the desalting process. Because of Federal budget constraints, funds for construction have been planned to be allocated over a four or five year time spread. We have notified the Bureau of Reclamation of the immediate need for additional funding to purchase the capacity from your agency, and as the attached letter from the Bureau indicates, we anticipate receiving the supplemental funds to enable us to pay CSDOC by the end of August 1997. The second 1.0 MGD unit will be purchased utilizing the time payment provisions of the new agreement. You have noted in previous correspondence, SAWPA and CSDOC have separate opinions on the method the contract provides regarding the costs for the deferred payment option computation. We anticipate that the difference can be resolved in accordance with the "Meet and Confer" requirements of paragraph 31 of the agreement, and, if necessary arbitration pursuant to paragraph 13. Thank you for your understanding and continued support for SAWPA's water resources protection programs. V�1�L Neil M. Cline General Manager am:Lever from USER 11615 Sterling Avenue,Riverside,CA 92503 • (909)785-5411 Administration FAX(909)785-7076 • Planning FAX(909)352-3422 United States Department of the Interior jUN 3 0 1997 �k 1 a BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SANTA. ANA`:VAT cnSF:cD Lower Colorado Regional Office FnJJ'_1:T AUTHORITY � P.O.Box 61470 LC w -2302 Boulder City.NV 89006.1470 LC302 WTR-4.072 ju; 2 5 1997 Mr. Neil M. Cline General Manager Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, California 92503 Subject: Fiscal Year 1997 Appropriations for the Chino Basin Desalination Project - Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), California - Small Reclamation Projects Act Dear Mr. Cline: This letter is in response to our telephone discussion of June 24, 1997. The reprogramming request for additional fiscal year 1997 funds for the subject project was submitted to the Washington Office last week. Approval for the reprogramming request should be received before the end of July 1997. Advance of funds for expenditure by SAWPA should be accomplished by the end of August 1997. Current estimates of the total amount of funds available for expenditure in fiscal year 1997 on the subject project are approximately $11.3 million. If you have any questions, please call me at 702-293-8618. Sincerely, Jean K. Shepherd Regional Loan Program Manager MARKET SURVEY FOR CATIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMICAL POLYMER Agency Polymer Product Name Type Quantity Used Contract Polymer Cost Supplier Per Year-Ibs. Renewal Per Active lb. Date County Sanitation Pdydyne Clarifloc LW-794 Mannich 552,000 V98 $1.779 Districts of Orange County L.A.City- Hyperion Pdydyne Clarilloc LA 1251 Mannich 1,500,000 6198 $1.0615 L A County-Bid 1• Polydyne Clarifloc LW 668 Mannich 1,642,603 W98 $0.997. L A.County-Bid 2• Allied Coiliods Pemol 79540K Mannich 1.875,000 "8 $0.006 East Bay Mud Polydyne Hydrofloc 748A Emulsion 600,0D0 8/98 $1.43 Chino Basin-Pit 1 Aqua Ban Hydrofloc 740D Emulsion 300,000 7198 $2.27 Chino Basin-Pit 2 Aqua Ben Hydrofloc 748A Emulsion 65,000 12/97 $2.41 •Vanous locations MARKET SURVEY FOR ANIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE CHEMICAL POLYMER Agency Polymer Product Name Type Quantity Used Contract Polymer Cost Supplier Per Year-tbs. Renewal Per Active lb. Date County Sanitation Districts Pdydyne Cladloc LW-689 Mannich 150,000 W97 $1.394 of Orange County L A.City- Hyperion Neutron Photofloe 1125S Mannich 245,000 6/98 $1.765 L A.County-Bid 1• Pohydyne Clarifloc LW921 Mannich 4.566,163 W99 $1.478 L A County-Bid 2• Alied Colloids DPA 700326 Mannich 1.667,732 7/99 $1.647 East Bay Mud No Contract Chino Basin-Ph. 1 Polydd Clarifloc LB4281 Emulsion 66,000 12/97 Chino Basin- Pit.2 Poly Clarflloc LB4281 I Emulsion 30,000 12197 .various locations H.1W P.DTA\RN12230W ELLERIDUBOIS W OLYSURV.W PD STATE OFCAUFORMA—T E RESOURCESAGENCY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Orange Coast District 3030 Avenida Del Presidente San Clemente, California 92672 (714)492-0802, FAX(714)492-8459 July 8, 1997 Mr. Don McIntyre General Manager, Operations County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, CA 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA. 92708 RE: Bolsa Chica State Beach Sanitation System Dear Mr. McIntyre: This is a short note to say thank you for the assistance the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(CSDOC)has provided to State Parks with its problem at Bolsa Chica State Beach. It is comforting to know that an agency such as CSDOC is at the ready to assist other entities by providing technical assistance with such highly skilled, professional people as that employed by you. Your organization went the extra mile to help us in finding the best solution to remedy the faulty sewer collection system in this park unit. Of special note are the assistance and expertise offered by Technical Services Director Nancy Wheatley and Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson. Their involvement in the team effort leading to our Department being able to implement a solution was without question critical to success. These people, and the many others working within CSDOC, are the reason your organization is recognized as a leader in service excellence. If there is anything we can do to help you in the future in similar fashion as you have helped us, please do not hesitate to call upon us. Again, Thank You! Sin ly, Jack B. Roggenbuck District Superintendent CC: D. Ito,Park Superintendent B. Anderson, CSDOC N. Wheatley, CSDOC asR07-0W625/534BCSE W ER a n July 11, 1997 MEMORANDUM TO: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager -y FROM: Layne Baroldi ) i ' — Regulatory Specialist THROUGH: Michael D. Moore k�v ECM Manager SUBJECT: Information for the Letter to the Boards of Directors Regarding the Funding for the Central Valley Biosolids Land Application EIR The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with a summary of the developments related to the funding of the Central Valley biosolids land application EIR for your letter to the Boards of Directors. Summary: In May of 1996, a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)-based lawsuit was filed by the Central Delta and South Delta Water Agencies in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, basically seeking to rescind biosolids land application permits issued pursuant to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board's (CVRWQCB) General Order unless an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. A majority of the Districts', as well as many other agency's, biosolids are currently being managed on sites permitted under this General Order. On June 12, 1997, the decision was made by Judge Ford that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should have been prepared by the CVRWQCB. Fortunately, Judge Ford has allowed the General Order sites to continue to operate for only 90 days. During these 90 days, those parties desiring to keep the sites permitted will have to devise a plan that will satisfy Judge Ford that there is a strong commitment to the funding of an EIR and present a schedule for the EIR preparation process. If Judge Ford is satisfied with the funding commitment and the EIR schedule, he will allow for the General Order sites to continue to operate during the EIR preparation process. This decision is a partial victory, considering that the Judge could have prohibited biosolids application on General Order sites during the EIR preparation process. CSDOC 0 F.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 `N y Donald F. McIntyre Page 2 July 11, 1997 Over 50,000 acres of land permitted for biosolids land application under the General Order is at stake. It is vital to the future of biosolids beneficial reuse in California, that the biosolids generators, land appliers, and fanners continue to advocate biosolids land application by funding this EIR. Completion of the EIR and adoption of the CVRWQCB's General Order will not only preserve the existing permits, but will also provide a more streamlined permitting process for biosolids land application in the Central Valley for the future. The funding of this EIR also provides POTWs with an opportunity to address, on a scientific basis, public perception issues that have increasingly plagued biosolids land application. If the EIR is not funded, the resulting loss of over 50,000 permitted acres would have an adverse economic impact on POTW's biosolids management programs. POTW biosolids managers strongly believe that the scientific research used to support EPA's 40 CFR Part 503 will provide the basis for this EIR's certification, but please note that certification is not guaranteed. If an EIR is funded, the CVRWQCB would be the lead agency for the project since they are responsible for the protection of the ground and surface waters in the Central Valley. The CVRWQCB would hire, and provide oversight to, a consultant firm for the preparation of the EIR. The CVRWQCB estimated that the funding required for this EIR will be approximately$500,000, with the entire project estimated to take about two years. Legal council for the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) believes, that by utilizing much of the information generated from a similar Stanislaus County EIR, the cost of the CVRWQCB EIR can be significantly reduced. Possible legal challenges may add an estimated $1.5 million to the cost. Unfortunately, recently passed SB 205 prohibits the use of State General Funds for this type of EIR. Michael D. Moore, the Districts' Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Manager and Chairman of the Tri-TAC Land Committee, has been instrumental in notification of other POTWs to the potential impacts of this litigation and in the solicitation of funds from over 200 agencies for this EIR. CASA has also been involved in the solicitation effort from their member agencies and will be the entity responsible for the distribution of funds as needed during the EIR development. As of July 11, 1997, approximately $250,000 has been pledged by POTWs throughout California to help fund this EIR. MDM/LB:wh JAWPL75501BAROLDIWEAD1750260 MEM c: N. J. Wheatley K Hadden ECM File TR i -TAC Reply To: Jointly sponsorotl by: League of California Cities California Association of Sanitation Agencies California Water Environment Association June 27, 1997 SUBJECT: Funding for Biosolids Land Application EIR Tri-TAC is a nonprofit professional organization sponsored by the League of California Cities, California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA), and the California Water Environment Association(CWEA). Tri-TAC's mission is to work with regional, state, and federal regulatory agencies on matters relating to publicly owned treatment works(POTWs), with the goal of improving the overall effectiveness of environmental programs and regulations that impact POTWs in California. The purpose of this letter is to alert your agency to recent litigation adversely affecting biosolids land application permits in California's Central Valley that demands our immediate collective action. In 1995, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) created a General Order permit for the land application of biosolids. The General Order permit process was established in order to streamline the biosolids land application permitting process. In order to comply with California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)requirements for the General Order, CVRWQCB staff utilized a negative declaration. In April of 1996, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) overturned the CVRWQCB's General Order but allowed for the continued land application on General Order sites that filed a Notice of Intent (NOI) on or before April 1, 1996. In May of 1996, a CEQA-based suit was filed by the Central Delta and South Delta Water Agencies in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, basically seeking to rescind the interim permission for biosolids land application under the General Order unless an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)is prepared. On June 12, 1997, the decision was made by Judge Ford that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should have been prepared by the CVRWQCB. Fortunately, Judge Ford has allowed the General Order sites to continue to operate for only 90 days. During these 90 days, those parties desiring to keep the sites permitted will have to devise a plan that will satisfy Judge Ford that there is a strong commitment to the funding of an EIR and present a schedule for the EIR preparation process. If Judge Ford is satisfied with the funding commitment and the EIR schedule, he will allow for the General Order sites to continue to operate during the EIR preparation process. This decision is a partial victory, considering that the Judge could have prohibited biosolids application on General Order sites during the EIR preparation process. Approximately 50,000 acres of land permitted for biosolids land application under the General Order is at stake. It is vital to the future of biosolids beneficial reuse in California, that the biosolids generators, land appliers, and farmers continue to advocate biosolids land application by funding this EIR. Completion of the EIR and adoption of the CVRWQCB's General Order will not only preserve the existing permits, but will also provide a more streamlined permitting process for biosolids land application in the Central Valley for the future. The funding of this EIR also provides us with an opportunity to address, on a scientific basis, public perception A technical advisory committee on POTW regulatory and policy issues 0 a issues that have plagued biosolids land application. If the EIR is not funded, the resulting loss of these 50,000 acres would have an adverse economic impact on POTW's biosolids management programs. POTWs strongly believe that the scientific research used to support EPA's 40 CFR Part 503 will provide the basis for this EIR's certification, but please note that certification is not guaranteed. If an EIR is funded, the CVRWQCB would be the lead agency for the project since they are responsible for the protection of the ground and surface waters in the Central Valley. The CVRWQCB would hire, and provide oversight to, a consultant firm for the preparation of the EIR. Ken Landau, the Permitting Engineer with the CVRWQCB, estimated that the funding required for a Central Valley EIR will be approximately $500,000, and the entire project will take about two years. Possible challenges to the EIR may add an estimated $1.5 million to the cost. The proposed EIR would be applicable to the entire Central Valley, with possible specific exclusions. The attached survey form is similar to that which has been already sent to CASA member agencies. Tri-TAC, along with CASA, is attempting to determine how many POTWs, land appliers, and farmers are willing to support the Central Valley General Order through the funding of the EIR. We would appreciate it, if you would complete this form and return it by fax or mail by July 11, 1997 to: Michael Moore 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714)962-2591 Fax Please feel free to contact me at(714)962-2411 ext 3654, if you have any questions. Tri-TAC Survey Funding for the Central Valley General Order Environmental Impact Report Agency Name: Contact: Telephone: I would recommend to my Board that our agency support the development of an EIR for the Central Valley General Order and would be willing to provide funds in the following amount. The purpose of the funding categories is simply to get a general idea of the importance of this issue to your agency. This does not represent a commitment. We will not know the precise amount of funding required until we determine how many agencies, land appliers, and farmers are willing to participate. $5,000 $5,000 to $10,000 $10,000 to $25,000 $25,000 to $50,000 Over$50,000 Please Fax or Mail to: Michael Moore(714)962-2591 Fax 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Thank You! Please return this survey form by July 11, 1997. s TR i -TAC Reply To: Jointly sponsoretl by. League of California Cities California Association of Sanitation Agencies California Water Environment Association June 27, 1997 SUBJECT: Department of Toxic Substances Control Regulatory Structure Update Task D.3 Waste Classification The Department of Toxic Substances Control(DTSC)is currently in the process of reviewing and revising California's system for identifying and regulating hazardous waste. The Regulatory Structure Update(RSU)process is a multi-part process which includes an evaluation of all aspects of California's hazardous waste regulatory program which difTer from the federal RCRA program. One of the components of the RSU is a waste classification review. A concept paper has been prepared that establishes a two tiered classification system. This would replace the existing system where a waste is classified as either hazardous or nonhazardous based on meeting the Tide 22 Total Threshold Limit Concentrations(TTLCs)or Soluble Threshold Limit Concentrations(SLCs). The new system would classify wastes as either"Hazardous"or"Special" (also called Managed Industrial Wastes)based on newly established TTLCs and/or Soluble or Extractable Regulatory Thresholds(SERTs). DTSC has recalculated and/or added new TTLCs and SERTs based on new scientific information and risk assessment modeling. DTSC has used EPA's maximum 503 values for cadmium,lead,and zinc as lower TTLCs. Based on the current proposal,it appears that biosolids would fall into the Managed Industrial Waste(MIW)category. Materials in the MIW category could no longer be beneficially reused and would have to be disposed of in a lined sanitary landfill. The option of exempting certain materials that are beneficially recycled has been discussed,but is still of concern based on public perception that the material would still be a hazardous waste. Attached for your review is an issue paper prepared by Ray Kearney of the City of Los Angeles,which provides a layman's description of the DTSC concept paper and its potential impacts. In developing this proposal, DTSC has not considered the impact the rule may have on biosolids reuse. This matter has been brought to the attention of Jesse Huff who is the Director of DTSC.To better understand what these impacts might be,Tri-TAC and CWEA are distributing the attached survey table. The table lists the existing and proposed hazardous waste limits. Also included is a shaded column titled"P077FBiosolids Concentration."For each constituent listed,please indicate what levels are found in your biosolids in terms of mg/kg wet weight-total concentration and mgMsoluble concentration For constituents not detected,please show the method detection limit (don't use ND). Your agency may not have been required to test for all the constituents listed-these can be left blank. Please return the survey table by July 11, 1997 to: CWEA c/o Mike Moore 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 714/%2-2591 (Fax) Tri-TAC and CWEA hope that this information will alert your agency to the potential impact this proposed policy will have on biosolids management programs. For further updates on the DTSC program,please contact Mike Moore at 714/962-2411,or check the CWEA home page at http://www.cwea.org/tritod. A technical advisory committee on POTW regulatory and policy issues 0 CWEA/TRI-TAC SURVEY Agency: Flow: MGD Biosolids: Tons/yr Contact: Biosolids Disposal Cost : S/yr % Industrial Flow: _MGD Phone: Cost to Divert to Disposal in Lined Landfill: Wye DTSC HAZARDOUS WASTE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTICS POTW Biosolids Concentration Proposed SERTs' Current Current Proposed TTLCs Existing mg/L STLC' RCRA mg/kg' TTLC Constituent mg/kg' m�e mg/L RL mg/kg3 Upper Lower B/L Upper Lower Aldrin 0.01 None 0.14 None 0.32 2E-5 1.4 Benzene 0.5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 Chlordane 0.01 0.004 0.25 0.03 12 0.14 2.5 ' Soluble or Extractable Regulatory Threshold based on TCLP test. 'Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration,mg/L soluble concentration based on CA WET test. 'Mg/kg wet weight,total concentration. 'Mg/L soluble concentration. 1 POTW Biosolids Concentration Proposed SERTs Current Current Proposed TTLCs Existing Constituent mg/L STLC RCRA mglkg TTLC mg/kg mg/L RL� m mg/kg mg/L Upper Lower m Upper Lower Chlorobenzene 100.00 Chloroform 1 6.0 o-Cresol 200.0' m-Cresol 200.02 p-Cresol 200.0z Cresol 200.O2 DDT and metabolites 0.6 0.001 0.1 None DDT and congeners 34 0.03 1 2,4-1) 7 None 10 10 14,000 21 100 IA-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 I,1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13 Dieldrin 0.01 0.002 0.8 None 1.8 7E-5 8 Dioxins 3E-5 4E-8 .01 Endrin 0.2 0.002 0.2 0.02 380 36 0.2 ' If o-,m-and p-Cresol concentrations cannot be differentiated,the total cresol(D026)concentration is used. The regulatory level of total cresol is 200 mg/I. 2 POTW Biosolids Concentration Proposed SER7's Current Current Proposed TTLCs Existing Constituent mg/L STLC RCRA mglkg TTLC mg/L L mg/kg mg/kg mg/L Upper Lower m Upper Lower Hexachlorobenzene 0.13 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.5 Hexachloroethane 3.0 Heptachlor 0.001 0.004 0.47 0.008 5.6 0.03 4.7 Kepone 0.01 None 2.1 None 1.5 MI 21 Lead (organic) 6E-5 2E-6 13 Lindane 0.02 None 0.4 0.4 280 0.03 4 Methoxychlor 4 1.8 10 10 33,000 1800 100 Methyl ethyl ketone 200.00 Mirex 0.01 0.001 2.1 None 4 0.004 21 Nitrobenzene 2.0 Pentachlorophenol 0.1 None 1.7 100 3,300 11 17 PCBs 0.03 0.014 5 None 0.7 0.0008 50 Pyridine 5.0 2,3,7,8-TCDD 2E-6 None 0.001 None Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 0.7 Toxaphene 0.2 0.0002 0.5 0.5 2.4 2.4 10 TCE 0.5 None 204 0.5 110 1.4 2,040 3 POTW Biosolids Concentration Proposed SERTs Current Current Proposed TTLCs Existing Constituent mg/L STLC RCRA mg/kg TTLC mg/L L mg/kg mg/kg mg/L Upper Lower m Upper Lower 2,4,5- 400.00 Trichlorophenol 2,4,6- 2.0 Trichlorophenol 2,4,5- 12,000 17 5 trichlorophenoxy 5 None I 1 propionic acid (Silvex) Vinyl chloride 0.05 None None 0.2 1.5 1.25 0.1 Antimony 0.6 None 15 None 1,400 80 500 Arsenic 1 None 5 5 220 21 500 1% 1% Asbestos N/A (by wt) (by wt) Barium 100 None too 100 250,000 I4,000 10,000 Beryllium 0.03 None 0.75 None 63 6 75 Cadmium 0.5 None I 1 970 39 100 Hexavalent Cr 0.5 None 5 None 33 3 500 Total chromium 3,200 I80 560 5 Cobalt 190 None 80 None 39,000 7,200 8,000 Copper 120 11 25 None 130,000 7,500 2,500 Fluoride 190 None 180 None 28,000 12,000 18,000 4 POTW Biosolids Concentration Proposed SERTs Current Current Proposed TTLCs Existing Constituent mg/L STLC RCRA mg/kg TTLC mg/kg mg/L mg/L RLmom, mg/kg Upper Lower Upper Lower Lead 1.5 None 5 5 8,500 300 1,000 Mercury 1 0.2 0.012 0.2 0.2 1,000 0.7 20 Molybdenum 16 None 350 None 8,400 1,000 3,500 Nickel 10 None 20 None 18,000 4,000 2,000 Selenium 5 5 1 1 18,000 4 100 Silver 16 3.4 5 5 18,000 1,000 500 Thallium 0.2 one 7 None 280 14 700 Vanadium 22 None 24 None 24,000 1,400 2,400 Zinc 950 100 250 None N/A 2,800 1 5,000 5 - CITY OF LOS ANGELES Bureau of Sanitation Ray Kearney Regulatory Liaison June 10, 1997 ISSUE PAPER Proposed Changes to the State's Waste Classification System May Double the Cost of the City's Biosolids Management Program WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED AND WHY On February 13, 1997, Cal-EPA's Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) issued to members of a Waste Classification Focus Group a draft concept paper which proposed to develop and adopt a revised California waste classification system establishing two tiers of regulated wastes. The proposal is part of DTSC's Regulatory Structure Update which is intended to ensure that California has a scientifically defensible method of classifying waste which protects public health and the environment without unnecessarily hindering sustainable growth and development. The reality is that this proposal, if enacted, would classify virtually everything (i.e., biosolids, municipal waste, dirt, etc.) as a Managed Industrial Waste under DTSC control and require that it e m: nifested and disposed in a composite lined landfill. DTSC believes that the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) system is incomplete and does not, by itself, adequately protect human health and the environment in California. California already has the strictest waste classification standards in the country and is the only state (to my knowledge) to not adopt the RCRA system. The differences between the two standards are based more on polity decisions than on science. The existing waste classification system in California considers such characteristics as the ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, and toxicity of the waste. This paper will discuss the proposed changes to the toxicity characteristic. California's toxicity evaluation includes Total Threshold Limit Concentrations (TTLCs) were established to protect human health and the environment from improper management of toxic ISSUE PAPER—Waste Classification June 10, 1997 Page 2 wastes. If a waste contains a concentration of listed constituent above the limit it is hazardous and must be managed accordingly. If it contains a concentration below the limit it is nonhazardous. DTSC is considering establishing a two-tiered limit, i.e., an upper and a lower limit for TTLCs. If a waste contains a concentration above the upper limit it would be hazardous. If it contains a concentration below the lower limit it would be nonhazardous. If it contains a concentration between the lower and upper limits it would be a Managed Industrial Waste. The limits that DTSC is considering for each constituent are based on either human health risk, on ecological impacts, on protecting groundwater or on detection limits. The risk assessment is similar (but uses different criteria and assumptions) to the process U.S. EPA used in developing the sewage sludge (biosolids) use and disposal regulations in 40 CFR Part 503 which were proposed in 1989 and finalized in 1993. The human health risk exposure scenario for setting lower TTLC limits is a resident living atop soil where the top three feet of fill is hazardous waste. Some of the lower TTLC limits for inorganics are based on aquatic and sediment toxicity for waterfowl. WHAT THE NEW REGULATIONS WOULD MEAN The following table shows the proposed lower TTLCs, the existing TTLCs, the Part 503 limits, and Hyperion's 1994 average concentration, in mg/kg, for three critical constituents: Constituent Lauver T1LC Exist 7rLc I Pan 503 H TP Diomn 4E-9 IE-2 IE6 Mercury 0.70 20.00 57.00 3.00 Selenium 4.00 100.00 100.00 6.00 ISSUE PAPER—Waste ClassJcadon - June 10, 1997 Page 3 The proposed lower limit for dioxin is almost two orders of magnitude below the most sensitive analytical procedure available today which is IE-6, or one part per trillion. The proposed lower limit for dioxin is almost six orders of magnitude (a million times) lower than the existing TTLC limit and almost two orders of magnitude below the level in Hyperion biosolids which is one order of magnitude below the level in background soils. Hyperion biosolids easily meet the existing requirements in Part 503 and TTI.Cs and are therefore nonhazardous and recyclable. These new limits are a radical departure from previous limits and the science behind them. Before such a radical departure is allowed to destroy successful recycling programs statewide, it would seem prudent to take a detailed look at the policy decisions and the science behind the new limits. What these numbers mean is that the City's biosolids will be classified as a Managed Industrial Waste necessitating their disposal in a composite lined RCRA Subtitle D landfill. This would not only destroy the City's award winning biosolids management program, but also increase the amount of waste going to landfill which conflicts with the landfill waste diversion requirements of AB 939. At a minimum, it would double the cost for managing biosolids from approximately $6 to $12 million per year. This assumes there is such a landfill available and willing to take the biosolids. July 16, 1997 0 - MEMORANDUM TO: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager FROM: Layne Baroldi ?I Regulatory Specialist IL THROUGH: Michael D. Moore AA ECM Manager U SUBJECT: Information for the Letter to the Boards of Directors Regarding the Department of Toxic Substances Control Waste Classification Modifications The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is currently in the process of reviewing and revising California's system for identifying and regulating hazardous waste that may adversely impact biosolids recycling. DTSC is using a process called the Regulatory Structure Update (RSU) to evaluate all aspects of California's hazardous waste regulatory programs that differ from the federal RCRA program. One component of the RSU process is a waste classification review. A concept paper has been prepared by DTSC that establishes a two tiered waste classification system based on "newly established scientific information"and risk assessment modeling for pollutant concentration limits. The two tiered waste classification system would replace the existing system where a waste is classified as either hazardous or nonhazardous. The new system would classify wastes as hazardous if it contains a concentration above the upper limit, special (also called Managed Industrial Wastes) if it contains a concentration between the lower and upper limits, or nonhazardous if it contains a concentration below the lower limits. Based on the current proposal, it appears that biosolids would fall into the Managed Industrial Waste (MIW) category. Constituents of concern that would place the Districts' biosolids into this category are dioxin and mercury. Materials in the MIW category could no longer be beneficially reused and would have to be disposed of in a lined sanitary landfill. The option of exempting certain materials that are beneficially recycled, like biosolids, from the MIW category has been discussed with DTSC officials. Biosolids land application could continue under an exemption from the MIW category, CSOOC 0 P.O.Boa 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 9212E-8127 0 (7M)962-2411 Donald F. McIntyre Page 2 July 16, 1997 but would create a public perception concern since by definition biosolids would be considered an "MIW." Unfortunately, in developing this proposal, DTSC has not considered the impact the rule may have on biosolids reuse. This matter has been brought to the attention of Jesse Huff, Director of DTSC. To help better understand what these impacts might be the Districts, through Tri-TAC, has distributed a biosolids pollutant survey table to 200 POTWs throughout California. The table lists the existing and proposed hazardous waste limits. We hope that this survey may provide notice to other POTWs of the potential adverse impact this proposed policy will have on biosolids management programs in California. Currently, the Districts' biosolids meet the existing requirements of 40 CFR Part 503 and California's Title 22 and are therefore nonhazardous and recyclable. The proposed limits are a radical departure from previous limits. If adopted without exemption, the proposed rule, at a minimum, would double the cost of managing the Districts' biosolids from approximately $4 to $8 million per year. Before such a radical departure is allowed to destroy the successful biosolids recycling programs statewide, the Districts and POTW member associations are reviewing DTSC's policy decisions and the science behind the proposed limits. MDM/LB:wh JAW 3550SAROLOINAEMOSOTSCAEM c: B. P. Anderson N. J. Wheatley K. Hadden ECM File July 16, 1997 MEMORANDUM TO: Blake P. Anderson Assistant General Manager-Operations FROM: Layne Baroldi P Regulatory Specialist THROUGH: Michael D. Moore iN 2- ECM Manager SUBJECT: Article for the Letter to the Boards of Directors Reporting on the CNN Biosolids Broadcasts and Relevant Responses On June 25, 26, and 27, 1997, a three-part special report on biosolids use in America titled "Hazardous Harvest" was broadcast on CNN's Moneyline program. Unfortunately, each day's broadcast was unbalanced and contained technical inaccuracies and omissions on different aspects of biosolids reuse in the United States. The titles of each broadcast; More than a bad smell?- Sewage sludge could affect every American (June 25), Denver sludge is a stinky biz-EPA policy raises troubling questions(June 26), and EPA defends sludge rules- Selling sludge is a stinky business(June 27). reveal CNN's biased attempt to sensationalize biosolids recycling for viewer attraction. Attached you will find copies of the broadcast text for each segment from CNN's Internet page. At the federal level, the Water Environment Federation (WEF) has been active in responding to CNN's allegations. Immediately after the first broadcast, Albert Gray, WEF's Deputy Executive Director, responded by providing information to CNN that refuted each allegation. Mr. Gray explained the difference between the previous practice of ocean disposal of untreated sludge and the land application of treated biosolids. Mr. Gray dispelled the notion that industries dump hazardous waste into the sewer by explaining that federal law requires industries pretreat waste to remove toxics and other contaminants before discharging wastewater into collection systems. WEF offered to provide a representative for an on-camera interview to dispel some of the myths and provide the factual context that was so sorely lacking in the broadcast. CNN chose not to accept WEF's offer. WEF provided CNN with a report on the National Research Council's findings that reaffirmed biosolids safety in food crop production as well as a list of quotes from scientist, academics, farmers, and regulators that support biosolids recycling. EPA reacted quickly to the CNN broadcast. On June 26, John Walker, leader of EPA's Biosolids Management Implementation Team, faxed a list of detailed answers to the questions raised by CNN's broadcast, and a biosolids fact sheet to the national biosolids spokespersons, WEF's Residuals Committee members, and AMSA Public Information Officers. This information reflects decades of research by EPA on biosolids CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 F vnlaln Valft C 9272B-8127 • (714)%2d411 Blake P. Anderson Page 2 July 16, 1997 that conclude that human health and the environment are protected when biosolids are land applied in accordance with the requirements of the Federal 40 CFR Part 503 Rule. All of this information supplied by WEF and EPA is on file at the Districts and can be found on WEF's Internet home page at www.wef.org. I am pleased to report that as of July 14, WEF has observed "little or no increase in calls" related to biosolids issues as a result of the CNN story. The Districts' has not received any calls regarding concerns over biosolids management as a result of CNN's stories. WEF will keep us apprised of any additional federal or state activities related to the CNN stories. LB:wh J'%WPl'i55 AROLMREAM750265.MEM Attachments c: N. J. Wheatley (w/o attachments) K. Hadden (w/o attachments) ECM File .9 sµ i ueB� p QfA {L„L7-..YIiJYEfJ1 p,�Lt(-1r_tf•L\�I t,�^i'�j p LP lUS'ILEJ! ♦ M� _ I L\VGNEIY Q� �EPFOiYgTCE Q _ I ,( MT Z, i MON A z 0.1= More than a bad smell? Moneyline Special Report: sewage sludge could affect every American From Correspondent Bill Dorman June 25, 1997: 8:53 p.m. ET Search the r et related stories EPA has pollution solution -Nov. 27, 1996 related sites U.S. Environmental Protection Aeencv Environmental Justice Information Paae 0W".'.'.' fk' NEW YORK (CNNfn)-Sludge. Usually thought of as mundane, stinky and belonging in a septic tank,the slimy stuff is now unavoidable and could affect the food supply and the health of every American. U.S. residents generate 22,000 tons of sludge every day, and by federal law,that sludge can no longer be dumped in the ocean. The Environmental Protection Agency now reclassifies that waste as "biosolids," and farmers spread it on their pastures. One farmer made a home video to show how he thinks sludge killed more than a hundred of his cows. "We had the vet for her this morning. And the vet says there's something toxic in a her," farmer Bob Roane said. "She don't know what it is. She says to take the cow to the slaughterhouse right away because the cow is going to die." State and federal officials say they studied the case and found problems with the way Bob Ruane ran his farm, but no demonstrable link between the cows'deaths and sludge. Roane's evidence is largely circumstantial. He says the cows got better after he stopped feeding them com grown with sludge. A lawsuit is pending. Whether or not sludge killed Bob Ruane's cows,the federal government is pushing the use of sewage sludge as fertilizer. And ifs spreading across the country. Fames in eastern Colorado use sludge to grow wheat for human consumption. In Frenchtown,N.J., Bill Pandy uses it on his crops grown mostly for animal feed. "I've never seen any adverse effects on my cows, on me ... using it, on plants, on wildlife, on anything," Pandy said. But there's one small problem. "It smells. It has an offensive odor," he said. No doubt about it, sludge production is a dirty business. It's made from everything you flush down the toilet, and everything industries put down the drain. The EPA does set limits on nine heavy metals,such as arsenic, cadmium, and lead. But the agency does not regulate or even monitor the levels of potentially deadly dioxins in sludge. There are no regulations for PCBs and no monitoring for pesticides. The EPA is not testing sludge on a nationwide basis. The last comprehensive national study ended in 1989, and the agency scrapped plans for a new study last year. "They're not testing for the chemicals or the synergetic effect of all these chemicals coming to ether and becoming more potent" said Charlotte Hartman, national coordinator for the National Sludge Alliance. "What are we talking about here?We're talking about toxic soup." A threat is posed not just to food grown with sludge. but to the land and the groundwater wherever sludge is applied. "It was banned from ocean dumping because of its threat and risk to the water and marine life," said Stephen Lester, science director for the Center for Health, Environment and Justice. "How can you take the same material and say that now it is safe to ...apply on farmland?" he asked. "That just makes no common sense,let alone technical sense." In New Hampshire, eight towns have either banned or sharply restricted sludge fanning.The rolling White Mountains may seem like an unlikely place to talk about industrial waste, but some area residents are worried about sewage sludge that's tracked in from out of state. The concern on a June night in the town of Webster is whether to continue a moratorium on spreading sludge on faun land. "There isn't a farmer in this state that goes down to the grain store and says to the man behind the counter,I want some fertilizer. I want lead. I want arsenic. I want cadmium. I want mercury. Give it to me in a big bag,because I'm going to spread it on my fields and make my crops grow,'" said Charlie Reid, an organic farmer at the town meeting. But federal sludge policy is not about crop growth, and it is not about agriculture. The policy is driven by the economics of waste disposal. "Our cost on the application sites run about 4 to 5 cents a gallon,"said Dennis Palmer, executive director of the Landis Sewerage Authority. "If we were hauling off-site,to another disposal site, it would be closer to 10 to 12 cents a gallon." Consider that the United States produces 8 million tons of sludge a year. Recycling sludge is much cheaper than legally dumping it. The savings run from $100 to $600 a ton. The potential savings nationally could approach $5 billion a year. But to Bob Ruane,those savings come at a greater cost. "I would say to any farmer right now, Don't even think of it. Don't even consider it,"' Ruane said. "They'd be making a big mistake. And I know this from experience." In part two ofMoneyline's special report, Bill Dorman will report from Colorado on what could be a precedent-setting stretch of federal sludge policy: an EPA plan to take waste from a hazardous, toxic Superfund site near Denver and Turn it into government-ap roved rtilizer. w Bob Ruane says sludge killed this cow. Sludge production is a dirty business. Ow. Bill Pandy a Charlotte Hartman w' •JYR bJ541E65 1Y RERR JV xTNCh 1 t- Denver sludge is stinky biz Moneyline Special Report: EPA policy raises troubling questions More than a bad smell? -Part One - June 25, 1997 From Correspondent Bill Dorman June 26, 1997: 8:41 p.m. ET search the net related stories EPA has pollution solution -Nov 27, 1997 related sites U.S. Environmental Protection Aaencv Environmental Justice Information Pa e 1 n:oserK DEER TRAIL, Colo. (CNNfn)-Beneath the ground in a suburb of Denver, lies some of the foulest toxic waste in the United States --the Lowry Landfill Superfund site. On the other side of Denver lies the biggest sewage treatment plant between the Mississippi River and the West Coast, and 60 miles to the East, rolling fields of early season wheat, which will be harvested for human consumption. What links these three sites is the federal government's plan to take ground water from the toxic dump, treat it at the Metro Plant sewage treatment facility, and then spread it as fertilizer on the wheat crop. "This is not a precedent-setting proposal. It is being done at Superfund sites across the country. And provided it is implemented properly and in compliance with all state and federal regulations, it will work and be safe for both the public and the environment," said Marc Herman, of the Environmental Protection Agency. Richard Price,however, is not so sure. Price's cattle ranch shares a five-mile border with those wheat fields. The Price family has been ranching there for a century, nearly as long as Colorado has been a state. Four generations of Prices weathered drought and depression. The threat they see from industrial waste, and at least trace amounts of radioactive elements, is something new. "It's going to affect not only us, but a lot of people if it gets into our food product, and particularly if it gets into our water supply," said Lylamae Price. Those fears are bringing together farmers, ranchers and environmentalists. "We are putting our food chain at risk, and we are going to be assuming the liability in what we eat in our tuna fish sandwiches and our peanut-butter and jelly that we spread for our kids in the morning and put in their lunches," Professor Adrienne Anderson, of the University of Colorado,said. Anderson and the Prices are fighting a policy which is a point of pride for the environmental protection agency. The agency considers the policy a recycling success story, and Metro Sewage of Denver a prize pupil. Last year,the Metro Plant won a national award from the EPA for"outstanding pre-treatment management" of sewage sludge. Most of Denver's treated sludge winds up about sixty miles east of the city, on farmland owned by Metro. All of the wheat is fertilized with sludge,then harvested, and sold on the open market. One obvious advantage Metro has in owning the farmland: Denver's sewage plant has a guaranteed customer for its sludge. Metro has no plans to specially treat the water from the Superfund site at Lowry. The agency believes federal regulations on Superfund sites, and sewage treatment, are sufficient. "We've obviously extensively studied the waste materials proposed to be discharged from Lowry, and we have years of experience determining what's going to go into our biosolids. The effects will be absolutely negligible. In fact Pretty much immeasurably negligible," Stephen Pearlman, of the Metro Waste Water Reclamation, said. Those words from Denver don't count for much in Deer Trail, Colo.,where the Prices are fighting to protect the land and the water they've guarded for more than 100 years,while also trying to convince the people of Denver to join their fight. "But how are you going to get 1.3 million users on your side, when they live in the city, and aren't even aware of the land that is laying out here, and the beauty of it, and the crops that are being grown. They don't have a picture of it, and we live in it," said Lylamae Price. "I guess what Ion looking at is,40 years from now, are they going to come back and say, 'well, we didn't have the technology,we didn't know about those elements at the time,they were considered safe,"' said John Price. Across the country, more and more people are demanding a re-evaluation of federal sludge policy, but so far the government shows no interest in revisiting the issue. For the Price family and others in Eastern Colorado,time is running out. The federal government's public comment period on the Superfimd to sludge proposal ends on Monday. In part three ojMoneyline's special report: Iffood grown with sludge is safe, then why won't major U.S.food companies such as Heinz and Del Monte buy it? ,'Link to ton; {video still} Lowry Landfill Superfund site {video still} Treated water from a toxic dump could wind up as fertilizer {graphic} {video still} Lylamae Price {video still} John Price home I business unusual I hot stories I contents I search I stock uuotes I hell) Copyright C 1997 Cable News Network, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ryt t � P EPA defends sludge rules Moneyline Special Report: Selling sludge is a sticky operation From Correspondent Bill Dorman January 21, 1997: 8:14 p.m. ET Search the net related stories Denver sludge is stinky biz - June 26, 1997 More than a bad smell" -June 25 1997 WASH NGTON (CNNfn)- As opposition to the federal policy of recycling sewage sludge as farm fertilizer grows, the story the selling of recycled sludge of who's not buying continues. Sewage sludge. It's waste from households and industries treated at a sewage plant and soon to be recycled as fertilizer. The Environmental Protection Agency prefers you call it"biosolids." So does the Water Environment Federation,the industry group for sewage plants across the country. "What it should convey is that this is a material that is carefully processed and tightly regulated, carefully monitored and fully controlled. precisely for the purpose of protecting public health," said Albert Gray,deputy executive director of the Water Envvorunent Federation. But selling the concept of sludge as a fertilizer has been difficult despite a high-powered lobbying effort. Powell Tate, the Washington public relations firm that advises sludge producers, conceded as much in a 1993 memo. OF THE position of hoVing to"sell" a new 11 product that is accompanied so The largest of America's food producers remain unconvinced. You won't find any tomatoes fertilized with sludge in a bottle of Heinz ketchup. Heinz guarantees that none of its products are grown with sludge. Heinz tells CNNfn it is "adamant" in its policy and "aggressive" in enforcing it." Del Monte has a similar policy. The National Food Processors'Association says it "does not endorse the use of sewage sludge on crop land" in part because "state and federal oversight may not be sufficient." The Water Environment Federation insists science is on its side, citing studies by the National Academy of Sciences and other reports that say biosolids are safe for food crops. "There is a very strong consensus in the scientific community about the safe levels of biosolids when applied to food crops," Gray said. The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals says otherwise. In a case early in June,the court said "experts have yet to reach a consensus on the safety of land application of sludge." And there is other evidence. Take cadmium a hea metal and the lack of global consensus on safe levels. 0 ILLSILM Denmark limits cadmium in sludge fertilizer to less than one part per million. Germany allows 10 parts per million. The state of New York allows 25. The EPA-- even in what it calls "exceptional quality sludge" --allows 39 per million. The EPA policy faces strong criticism even within the agency. "Official U.S. government policy in the Clinton administration is to grow food chain crops --the food supply of America-- on poison. And not to tell the public," EPA engineer Hugh Kaufman says. The EPA denied a request by a New Hampshire citizens group, which asked for special labels on food fertilized with sludge. r "For one thing, biosolids --sewage sludge --are in a lot of different fertilizers -- used as filler in fertilizers," said Dana Minerva of the EPA's water office. "So you'd almost have to label every single jar and can." That would be just fine with Helane Shields of Alton, N.H. "The only way we can fight back and stop this assault on our environment is by enacting ordinances on a town-by-town basis," Shields said. But in almost every city and town, it's economic, rather than environmental, concerns that are driving this debate. Sludge recycling saves money for thousands of sewage plants. and that economic reality has shaped a policy that up to now has also been marked by a lack of public awareness. ► r . A sewage plant"aawwou to call it "biosolids." The jury is still out on the safety of sludge. home I business unusual I hot stories I contents I search I stock quotes I help Copyright C 1997 Cable News Network, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 60:41 JUN 27, 1997 ID: WRTER ENV FED TEL NO: (703) 684-2492 #24153 PR(E: 1/3 �17�D�r oS URGENT FAX MEMORANDUM TO. Biosolids Spokespersons WEF Residuals Committee AMSA Public Information Officers FROM: Nancy Blatt, Public Information Director, Water Environment Federation DATE: June 26, 1997 RE: CNN Biosolids Story Tonight(Thursday, June 26), CNN will continue its'special report' on biosolids recycling, entitled Hazardous Harvest, during the Moneyline program (7 p.m. EST). The first piece in the series aired June 25 and, despite input from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) and the Water Environment Federation(WEF),was anything but balanced and contained a number of technical inaccuracies and omissions. While WEF is working with CNN to rectify this situation, the EPA has issued official responses to the allegations made in the initial segment. For your information, those responses are included here. The Federation will also keep you apprised of additional activities. Meanwhile, please contact WEF Public Information (Nancy, Loraine Loken, Dave Trouba)at(703)684-2400 if you have 7 questions. Also, please let us know of any media calls you get and what they are asking. If you didn't see the report on CNN and would like a text version, send a request to Dave Trouba via e-mail at dtrouba@wef.org or call (703)684-2480. Thank you ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS RAISED IN THE CNN TV SEGMENT ENTITLED HAZARDOUSNARVEST RUNE 26,1997 P.dud by the Office of water of the U.S.Eowoommtal Protection Agency Rohm wa]ker,IraderBiomlids Mmagement Implmnmlafim Team,202-260-7283 • Am blosueds the asbefn+ofthe 90s? No.biosolids are one ofthe most studied maierials the have ever be mregulated by EPA EPA strongly concludes that the land application of biosolids,when pcifmmed under the Federal Part 503 Rule,is fully protective of pubbe beamh and the mvironmemt. Decades ofresearch om biosolids have not demonstrated negative human health or environmental impacts when the biosolds quality and conditions of land appheation have met the appropriate requirements of the Pan 503 Rule. • Cam therw7clingorblos lbis af/ fbefmdsuppty=dheaChofewryAmoiemr? Although the recycling ofbiosobds back m the land is a com s o pmetice,there are not nearly enough biosolids to fertilize every crop in the US. Only a small pmcemage(much less that I percent)of the miel food supply has been faultred with biosolids Decades of studies have demonstrated thai biosolids cm be safely used on food mops Ile National Research Counca,atic studying the issue for three years,confirmed bmsolids safety under emtemt federal regulaliws. In additiou,an epidemiological 00:42 JUN 27, 1997 ID: 1JRTER OW FED TEL NO: (703) 684-2492 824153 PRGE: 2/3 study of the health of farm families caving bu ohds showed that the use ofbiomlids was safe. • Did sludge cause the cowa to get skis in Vermont? The State Vetermarim of Vermont has investigated Bob Rume's farm and reported thin Rome,was a dealer and received cows from marry diBere n areas. His cows were not property nourished;however,the percentage of sick or dying cows in Roan 'a herd was no different from herds that did not eat fads grown on bionolids treated soils. • why would farmers use bhrmllds? Contrary to the CNN-TV airy that showed virtually no benefits from using bio adids,biosolids provide fames with$60 to$160 per acre worth of fertilizer,including many essential nutrienu that the farmer may not normally replenish in the soil.Biomlids also contain valuable organic matter which improves the health,quality and structure of the soil. • Did the federal government ban ream damping of sludge bamume of threat to marine ecology? Then was little threat to the marine environment from the disposal ofbmmlids 0 the 1O6 We Ocean Dumping Site from pollutants in the bicsolids. Years after this activity bas ceased,mormaring surveys a Out sin have never demonstrated adverse efforts on name life there. The reason why Congress banned roan dumping was not that biomlids were uric to som me life. Congress recognmed that to nutrients in biosolids could case increased algae pmduetimt,eventually leading to oxygen depletion at the site. Congress properly decided that it made much more aces:and better policy to get biosolids our of the ocean and¢se the nutrients in biosolids mom productively to provide crop nutrients and to improve soil quality. • Does biosoltds have a bad sail? Each biocolids will have its owv distinctive sam,depending on the type oftreaanew,it has been though. Some biosnlidv may have only a slight musty,ammonia odor. Others have a stronger odor that may be offensive to surcpeople when lbebimolids arefreshlyapplied Theodor is cased prummilyby mmpoundscontaining sulfur and aomonie,both of which=plan nutrients. • Is blowlids production a dirty bushman? Themea mtandcleaningofsewageendwastewatormaybecorrtidemdbyminewbea"dirtybusiness"biro•,veitdealswith wage products. But it ism essential public health service. '1'oday's wastewater profcWmiats not mdycleam our wan,but create usable by-products Me bicsolids. • Doer EPA regulate dlaxim In biosolids? Dioxam were among the pollutants=intend in the EPA-sponsored 1988-89 National Biosolids Survey. Results from that survey indicated low levels ofdimdas in biomhds Watwere within the range of value seen in sails and other media A prdimmmynskaesasm®tofdoorsathenlevelsindim anegligible risk topublichealth and ereenviroomentham denims iubiomlids. Today,several publicly owned treatment works(POTWs)continue to monitor fordioxins inbirsolids. Tbeirresults show Out dictum levels we within the range found in the 1989-89 survey. • Don EPA regulate PCB•in bioaolids? EPA don have regulations fmPCBs under the authority of the Tories Substances Control Act This regulaesumurialswith PCB contamination of a least 50 mglkg. In the 1988-89 National Emsulids Survey.PCB levels were generally found to be in the range of one-hundredth to onc-thousandth of this level That,together with a risk assessment that demonstrated negligible risk to public health ad the cnv mmenl from Wee levels of PCBs in biosotrds and the fact that PCBs are no longer manufactured in the US,convinced EPA that it was not necessary to include PCBs in the Pat 503 Rule or to require monitoring for PCBs in bfosolids. However,an with doxiav,many POTWs continue to monitor for PCBs in biosolids and their results we in line with the low levels found in the national survey. • Doer EPA regulate pesticides in hiosofids? In the development of the Part 503 rile,EPA conducted rids= i+a•for 22 organic coogoueds,including nine chlorinated pesticides. The results of that assessment showed neghipble risk to public health and the eavironmeat font the trace commum mus of the pesticides in biesolida Therefore,u wild dioxin and PCBs,TPA decided not t m&g leals err regni e monitoring of these pesticides in bimolids. As with doors sod PCBs,many POTWs continue to monitor pesticides in their biosolids and ihe'm results we wrvvi9cot with the very low levels fund in the national survey. • why did the EPA net update Ili National Biosolid•Survey? 00:43 JUN 27, 1997 ID: WRTER EW FED TEL NO: (703) r84-2492 024153 Pi%,E: 3/3 "w Basil on routine muoni"data submitted by bimnlids generators received over the past six years,it appears that,as a minimum,biosolids quality is unchanged,or has even improved compared to the quality docsonmtad in the 1988-89 covey. • Why Is the EPA not testing sludge on a nationwide basis? The EPA requires all POTWs throughout the country to mordmr and report the contents ofits sludges or biosolids,not only for the Part 503 pollutants(metals)but all the priority pollutants ofthe Clean Water Act,including pesticides,PCBs and dicir ms. • Is sludge made from ewrythiugyou fhuh down the oiler and evoydhmg fit lusby put,down Use m®r? This question implies that the biceolids that are being recycled in laud are row,untreated,and full ofmwes. This is not the case. Bicselids that are land applied are usefully treated and used in accordance with Part 503 rule and have ilreir quality further assured by required industrial pretreatment May analytical soldier by municipalities show the the quality ofbiosolids has continued m inrrrase braise of mdwmal pretrahm t. For example 98%of all biesolids in Moonset Table 3 high quality bioserlids values in the Part 503 rule. • Is there a synergistic effect(an manse in effect)from the combmaliun ofcompo®dt in biosolids? Them is no empirical evidence that the combination of pollutants in today's quality bimolide,are exerting eegative synergistic effects. Asa math of bzt,the oppoate is gmwaffy true. Ferexsmple,there is strong evidence in indicate that the presence of zone in bicsolids suppmssrs the uptake of admit®in crops and calcium,iron and me from biosolids are absorbed and reduce the biaavailability,of cadmium,selmium and molybdenum in foods. • Is there really a threat to crops,land or groundwater from biorolida? Thereisnothr mtheenv'uevurm4humans,oranimals whmbiomkdsareapphodpmperlyaceordingmfedadregdatioo and good farming practices.As with my fatilaer,however,tut much can be applied Ova-fertilizaimn can result in too much oitmgen(the primary nutrieN in ferutvnrs),which can pollute groundwater This is the reason that the mount ofbicsolids added to crops is carefully calculated m matcb the amount needed Crops fenifnrd properly with biosthds have the same content of nutrients and metals ofolher crops and are not contaminated • Why would an organic former make the ammeat that nofarmer•waldgo down to the grain store adsay that lwsadca&nbum4admm curylogrowmycsop? Organic famers want in grow crops without the adi ilicr of ehemials m pesticides.However sells initially contain mmy substances,over,so-called heavy metals like me,cadmium,lead,and mercury. Theseamnanuel substances which came from the earth's bedrock They are present in our suds,ourfoods,and our biaolida Wbeo we recycle biosolids,we ere retuning these elements,in small cmrozotmtiao,back to the earth Many fames,because of repeated crop cycles on their lands,are developing deficiencies of some of these elements. Biasolids an supply the needed elements,such as zone,and thereby maintain the suit's productivity. • Is EPA pushing the use of bloatids as a fertilizer? Is the federal policy for bioa0ds driven by economies of disposal? As a result of its decade-long asressrrmt of biosolids,EPA concluded that recycling biosetrds to land was an ensvomaentally respnnvble solution,when used in Ss^_e with the Part 503 rule. The Federal policies supporting and promising the beneficial recycling ofbiomlids are based upon stand science that has demonstrated the benefits ofsueu recycling. Those policies are not driven by canomia. Currently disposal by landfdlingis often less costly than land application. • Is recycling much eheaper than disposal? Disposal cols have mcressed dramatically m recentyears,because of shrinking Lndfill space and increased eats m maintain and monitor landfills.Cities and towns find that recycling bmsolids is generally much cheaper thin la dfillmg,especially when bioolids are in demand by local farmers for ferolimsg than crops. Donald F. McIntyre Published by DART Communications Task Team July 1, 1997 DART DARTBOARD DART: DISTRICTS ASSESSMENT AND REINVENTION TEAM As we come to the start of our first one involving our record control measures, new automation 1997-98 fiscal year and the end of keeping systems. The and our recent staffing losses have the last one,we'd like to take a Computerized Maintenance already reduced our gap to around moment to reflect on our progress Management Systems(CMMS) 3 million dollars and we feel to date. As you know, the group is putting together our strongly that the program of O&M/GSA D.A.R.T. process was various"Stake Holders'CMMS measures outlined by our"Change formed to find ways and means to system needs and requirements, Business Plan'will capture the reduce or eliminate the 5 million so that whatever system we end remaining gap. Lastly, sometimes dollar per year gap between the up with in the future, it meets every lost in the process of trying to Districts O&M costs and those of a users needs,fully and easily. The reach our multiple goals, is the contract O&M firm. Well, Ks been Adaptive Work Force Team(AWF) process itself. The Process we a long road to get to this point, and has initiated the formation of a are using is an inclusive process. we still have quite a way to go. To (Digester and Dewatering)O&M Reaching into all levels of our all the people who have given so area Workteam,which will be organization to form teams of much of their time and energy to meeting weekly to help coordinate individuals to help solve our this project, we'd like to give you a the large amount of maintenance problems and create our future. well meant"Thank You'. These work in this area with operational Re-invent our future. are difficult and complex issues needs, and the hope is that we can we've been dealing with and the eventually form similar teams in Ultimately, as we continue to move effort you've put forth has been other process areas as well. As this process along,we will be left extraordinary. To our the TPIT group begin to put with an organization made up of stakeholders,we'd like to'Thank together their optimization and empowered employees,who are You'or your patience. This automation plan for this area, allowed to make their own process that we are involved in they'll have a strong O&M decisions relative to the work they must be done carefully and Workteam already in place to help are performing. These employees thoughtfully, and that takes time. them with the plan and project. In will have a positive and proactive So,where are we today? The short,we are basically on track say in the direction of the agency. Treatment Process Improvement with the O&M'Change Business Further, if we also expect our Team(TPM team,who will be Plan' formulated, out of the Phase employees to be accountable for working with engineering and the 11 report DART generated last the results of this empowerment, Plant Automation Group to add to January. This is a long process then as an organization we have and renew our process automation and many of the elements will take an obligation to provide the systems, is getting ready to go out two to three years to complete. resources with which they can into the two plants and begin The good news is that even during successfully use this I collecting the necessary data to the development part of this empowerment That commitment ensure a successful automation process we have continued to is there, as has been stated project The Administrative make progress toward the multiple times by the General Practices Team(APT) has eventual elimination of the 5 Manager and others. Which formatted a rather extensive list of million dollar gap. Chemical brings us back to where we are issues to begin focusing on,the usage,and Solids Handling cost today, in the pis. JLIL GIB '97 13:05 FIR PILLS&IRY MADISON TO 1B P.02 v Pillsbury ir.:A ter. ' 2 ��'' wnquaYS wr ua tg1 ` IeF W{ST G{0.1DWwriVflE lero +_ p' A v 6wX mHA.GLLdUPMw 91101�19 y SRVX010 I619)2H.ff0] FwT(mq r)b.le➢f H ��j Sutro LLP (619) 544-3177 Settlement Negotiation Materials PRIVQ.EGED AND NOT ADMISSIBLE California Evidence Code §1152 Federal Rule of Evidence §408 July 8, 1997 VIA FACSUAME AND U.S. MAIL Bruce Bennett, Esq. Hennigan, Mercer & Bennett 6D1 S. Figueroa Street Suite 3300 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Colmty of Oran¢e $30 Million Merrill Lynch Settlement Dear Bruce: My letter to you yesterday reflecting my settlement recommendation regarding the above matter is withdrawn. The OCIP Comminee met today and unanimously demanded the County turn over the entire $30 million settlement to the Representative. Apart from the legal arguments for this demand under the Plan and our earlier agreements, the Committee strongly believes that the County sold out an important part of its strategic and substantive position against Merrill Lynch and that this settlement was crafted to advance only the political and economic inteiests of the County at the expense of the litigation interests of Pool Participants. swoaco ros w�Fsa rout owlce cotrvrr swccwF-tE.�o sw nwnmcomavFF vwurr awsFm+arov ac Flaw 9mmroF;yo SIT1119 .� JUL 08 '97 13:05 FR PI LLSI3JR1' MRD ISON To is P.03 w Bruce Bennett, Esq. - July 7, 1997 - — Page 2 The various constituencies of the OCIP Committee believe that the effect of this Settlement compromises the earliest payment in full of the School's S54.7 million entitlement under the Plan, and are of a single mind that the $30 million should be immediately transferred in full to the Representative. M tonvarded In his wismoe to avoid do* Patrick C. Shea cc: OCIP Committee and Counsel 210n U9. � TOTRL PRGE.03 »� JUL 02 '97 15:33 FR PILLSBURY MADISON 619 236 1995 TO le P.02 Orange County, California - One Year Later e �; , , : constraints, before a solldfnvesfinent- rade enrol ,CNaods Kva ,aK,';u"e"'.^. -'." ,. --T°,�•�t^:iss;`.. obligation bond rating In the single-A range can be .'S(eutl6rda�f$Otti;J' 5' i :1_ obtained. It has been approximately one year since Orange Financial Information County's plan of adjustment was consummated and Due to the county bankruptcy, the budget pro- became effective on June 12, 1996, Orange County cuss for fiscal 1995-96 represented a major depar- then issued its Series 1996 certificates or padiclpe- tuts from established policies and procedures. soli (COPS)and emu from bankruptcy with a Preserving the health, safety and welfare of Orange solid recovery plan. Th emerged he Orange County habW County residents was critical while bringing butl- was unlike most municipal bankruptcies (albeitt,,few ew getary expenditures in line with anticipated revenue in number)in that the demographics 0}the county sources. Critical program cuts were implemented Caland its position t e major economic center In during fiscal year 1994-95 which established base The 1994ornia and in the nation remained unchanged. budget levels for fiscal year 1995-96.The discre- The 1994 bankruptcy filing was related to the tionary part of the county's general fund budget heavy r budgeting practices at the time end its was reduced 41% from $462,5 million to heavy reliance on investment earnings from the Orange County Investment Pod(OCIP). $275 million, due primarily to a reduction in annual New invest- ment practices and many changes that impose interest Income.The County's discretionary general fund budget for fiscal 1996-97 Increased to greater accountability on county management have $295 million and is anticipated to increase to been implemented. Orange Countys economy approximately$300 million for fiscal 1997.98, which continues to recover from the recession of the early 1990s;its financial poslifl(tlon has Improved;and Its still appears manageable. tax-supported debt bad Is moderate. The Countys cash position suffered as well. Orange County's undesignated general fund balance declined Overall we believe Orange County has made financial position. from IM million(6.6%of general fund revenues) in fin m its budget process and fiscal 1993 to S25 million(t�%of general fund fl positron, some of which/s due to the slowly revenues)In fiscal 1995.which is low considering Improving economy. Orange County's undesignated Orange County's size. However, the county had an fund balance of$57 million in 1996 represents an operating surplus in its general fund of approximately adequate 4.7% of general fund revenues. As of $76 million in fiscal 1996, after two years of operat- June 30. 1996,the county's combined direct debt ng deficits in 1994 and 1995.The undesignated totaled approximately$1.7 billion. $637 of debt per general fund balance has grown since to approxi- capila which Is moderately low for a county of mately$67 million.0r 4.7%of general fund revenues, 2.6 million people. Additionally,Orange County as of June 30, 1996, which is adequate. However, adopted a credit and debt management policy on trial court funding issues yet to be resolved could Apr. 22, 1997, which we view positively Among further strain the county's general fund. other things, the objectives of this new policy are to continue to achieve an annual balanced budget, Orange County also had a designated(reserved) implement an investor relations program, build fund balance of$53 million in 1996, of which confidence with those in the financial community, $14.8 million is being held as a special reserve for including Investors, build contingency reserves and defeasing bonds in the future. In this way. Orange debt defeasance reserves and gain efficient access County hopes to lower its debt burden created by to the short-term capital markets. We continue to the bankruptcy. As part of its fiscal 1997 budget. believe an investment-grade rating In the BOB the county has budgeted another$12 million range Is warranted. Orange Countys new senior contribution to bring the defeasance reserve to management team and the Board d'Supervisors $26.8 million and plans to contribute a minimum of must develop a track record, given its new budget $15 million annually from uncommitted fund balance �1QFd�aRs&SaetLrc Mq•l;/D97 JLL 01 197 09:58 PAIE,02 JUL 02 '97 15:34 FIR PILLSBURY MADISON 619 236 1995 TO 19 P.O3 and excess revenue from its Teeter program. It is Recovery Bonds and Recovery COPS anticipated that the county's delsesance fund will Leverage Orange County's Future approximate$140 million by the end of fiscal 2002. While we consider Orange County's debt position This does not include approximately$108 million In to be moderate, the county has significantly lever- a special working capital fund that is used for the aged Its future.The Recovery Bonds and Recovery county's short-term cash needs. It the county is able COPS are both secured by motor vehicle license to gain efficient access to the short-term debt fees, with the Recovery Bonds having a superior market and issue TRANS in the future,the lien. Motor vehicle license fees historically have $106 million would become available to the county. been a county revenue that can be used for county The money could then be used at Orange County5 operation within the general fund. Orange County discretion to defease outstanding debt or fund elected to participate in an-'intercept program." various capital projects. whereby the State Controller will pay the motor vehicle license lees directly to the trustee for the Long-Term Obligations Recovery Bonds and Recovery COPS.The Recov- From 1993 to 1996, Orange Counly5 general long- ery COPS also have certain sales tax revenues term debt obligations increased from$391 million pledged as security,among other revenue sources, in 1993 to approximately$1.6 billion in 1996. exclu- that are deposited with the trustee pursuant to the s'rve of the county5 teeter bands and airport revenue intercept program.These fees and revenues are bonds which have their own funding sources.The pledged as long as the bonds and COPS are $1.6 billion Includes the counryk general Obligation outstanding and could have been used for future bonds, certain revenue bonds,certificates of capital projects or financings, thereby leveraging participation (COPS), master lease agreements, Orange County's future. In addition; the Recovery and pension obligation bonds. In its effort to COPS are secured by lease rental payments made emerge from bankruptcy, Orange County issued by the county for use and occupancy of what used approximately$280 million 1995 Refunding Recov- to be unencumbered assets.There are 49 Orange ery Bonds and$761 million 1998 Recovery COPS. County facilities covered by the master lease Debt service requirements increased from approxl- agreement. Had many of these facilities remained mately S36 million prior to the bankruptcy filing to a unencumbered, Orange County could have peak requirement of about$186 million in 2001. pledged them as collateral for future COP issues. according to the 1995 audit. Including the Recov- The Recovery Bonds and Recovery COPS are ery Bonds and Recovery COPS, peak debt service insured and rated AAA. However. the Recovery requirements represent approximately 14% of total COPS obtained an underlying rating of Bea1B/BBB general fund expenditures, which is high, by MoodyS. Standard 8 Poor);and Fitch Investors Although debt service requirements have increased Service, respectively, based on the strong legal by nearly six times,the Recovery Bonds and structure of the transaction and the revenue Recovery COPS have their own pledged revenue pledged towards payment of the COPS. We believe sources and, in our opinion, are not fully consid. debt service payments on the Recovery Bonds ered tax-supported debt of the county.Therelore. and Recovery COPS are insulated from any unoer- we consider Orange County§tax-supported debt to taintles regarding Orange County's budgetary have increased from$391 million in 1993 to approxl- process and financial position. In any case, these mately$550 million In 1996. primarily as the result insured issues still trade at a slight discount to the of the pension obligation bonds issued in 1994. insured market, offering yields up to five basis Excluding the two recovery issues, the county'a points higher, debt service requirements decline about$80 mil- Brad W. Bode lion, representing about 7.5% of total general fund Foxed Income Research expenditures,which is moderate. aowce! 1996 Comprehensive Annual Financiai Report An expanded version or this report Is available from the Supply Department(SUP). The order code Is R-010B. May 7;1997 .J4GFFT«aMs&.Smafx JUL 01 -97 09:59 PGYF-GC[ + TOTAL PAGE.03 + r OlTCbrs s,NLE t q-PHILIP L.ANTHONY . - WES BANNISTER P.W., WES BANNISTER DANIEL E.GRISET KATHRYN L.BARR ® rim Vice P. t JOHN V.FONLEY > ® ' Z ARNT.G.'BUD'OUIST DANIELE.GRISET C Se Vrc PreF w LAWRENCE P.KRAEMER JR. GEORGE OSBORNE �N JF ,r WILLIAM R.MILLS JR, GeMmK LANGDON W.OWEN CLARN IDE IDE IRV PICKLER ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT OBiBr810o "f ARNTG.'BUD'QUIST June 24, 1997 Mr. John R. "Woody" Wodraska, General Manager Metropolitan Water District of Southern California P.O. Box 54153 Los Angeles, CA 90054 Subject: Orange County Regional Water Reclamation Project (OCR) Participation Request Dear Woody: Thank you for attending the OCR Project Cooperative Committee meeting on April 22, 1997. Your comments on MWD's future and how the OCR Project may be integrated into your overall plan to provide regional benefits for the MWD service area were very informative. Please accept this letter as our formal request to develop a plan whereby MWD would participate in the development of the OCR project for the benefit of the MWD service area. As we indicated, the OCR Project would reclaim up to 100,000 afy of wastewater from the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County which is now being treated and discharged to the Pacific Ocean. The majority of this water would be percolated or injected into the groundwater basin where it would eventually be pumped into the potable supply system for use by Orange County residents. Five MWD member agencies in Orange County would benefit from this water which include the cities of Anaheim, Fullerton and Santa Ana along with Coastal MWD and the Municipal Water District of Orange County. Additional project information is attached. While we understand that the size of the OCR Project may make it difficult to fit within the existing MWD programs, the project provides unique opportunities for participation by a consortium of local and regional interests. The Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) that MWD recently completed calls for fully utilizing the existing potential for local groundwater conjunctive use and implementing cost effective water recycling projects identified by member agencies. You indicated that the IRP may be revised which we would agree with doing. We also suggest P.O. BOX 8300,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CA 92728-8300 • 10500 ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CA 92708 TELEPHONE(714)378-3200 FAX(714)378-3373 II Page 2 OCR MWD Participation Request that the OCR Project clearly supports the cooperative intent of the IRP and should be considered for inclusion in future MWD planning. The size of the OCR Project provides MWD the opportunity to participate in a regionally significant new water supply project with substantial "economies of scale" which will be very economical as compared with a greater number of smaller projects. Also keep in mind that the OCR Project will provide notable water to about 23 retail agencies and approximately 2 million residents in Orange County which represents approximately 20% of the total MWD assessed valuation. We believe that the OCR Project would offer MWD a significant return on investment in helping to meet the region's reliability requirements into the future. We understand that MWD is currently attempting to obtain additional water supplies from Northern California and the Colorado River system. The OCR Project, as a local project, will be much easier to develop and with significantly less financial support from MWD. Politically the OCR Project shows Southern California's strong commitment to recycling and should assist your efforts to obtain additional supplies from Northern California or the Colorado River. In summary, we believe the OCR Project will become a significant resource, both to local and regional interest, and that MWD should pursue the opportunity to become involved with its development. We look forward to discussing available options with your staff. Please contact Mr. William R. Mills Jr. of OCWD if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, William R. Mills Jr. 43en&ral Manager Donald F. McintyWOGeneral Orange County Water District Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County t 4 Page 3 OCR MWD Participation Request Stan Sprague,�e,,rnger R bert Carr, Assistant General Municipal Water District of anager/Water Services City of Orange County Anaheim Thom Coughran, Water Resources Hunter Cook, General Manager Manager City of anta Ana Coastal Municipal Water District n Robert Hodson, Director of Engineering City of Fullerton Enclosure cc: Debra Man, MWD Brian Thomas, MWD Andy Sienkiewich, MWD OCR Project Conceptual Schematic Fuilerton jAnaheim Spreading Facilities aiver Future - * Landscape + Irrigation & Typical Industrial -- ;� Well Users �m C„ 59C em4 Future Landscape ♦Irrigation & Industrial1q-- `� - - Users ,-� uture La dscape Huntington �m Jrd ation & Beach ♦ It ustrial y et> Seawater Intrusion Groundwater Barrier Basin Boundary Irvine WF21 reen CSDOC Acres Treatment Pr°je°f / Facilities i 4(!> N 0c 240 mgd / 0 Q 1( I Mep b mr ro scale d7 OCR PROJECT FLOW DIAGRAM Wastewater Inflow Oi Seawater Anaheim COO A U Barrier Spreading Basins U ' ° Primary Disinfection Disinfection Treatment yI 1 I 80%receives 53/ receives I Reverse Reverse ary Osmosis Osmosis Second I treatment treatment , I Treatment I I I Micro- I filtration Qce� �isclla}�ge I Landscape Disinfection' ---► Irrigation Needs y� OCR PROJECT PHASE I SUMMARY SCHEDULE TASK 1 1 1997 1 1996 1997 1998 1999 1 2000 2001 2002 1 L 3 4111213141 1 27 4 12 3 4 I 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 1 2 7 4 1 1 2 1 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 FINAL FEASIBILITY ROVRT MEMNON WATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES R RT ENGINEERS REPORT TMN CSDOC OCEAN DISCHARGE PERAOT SARWATERQUAL &NEALTNSMIY CRMMUNITY BLICPMLVEMENTPROGRAM CBQ"UA ENVIRONM AL DOCURffN15 IMINARY ERGINEEMNG DIX.STRATEGIC PLAN OR DESIGN PERMITTIN WQWSIM0N CONSTRUCTION Lqm C.Ok Wa - R.muftWW o PRELIMINARY OCR Unit COST ESTIMATE Phase I Total Estimated Capital Cost $246,000,000 USBR Federal Government Grant $20,000.000 Remaining Capital Cost shared by $226,000,000 OCWD & CSDOC Annual amortized capital cost $17,700,000 @ 6% interest over 25 years Annual Operation & Maintenance Cost $13,400,000 Annual Monitoring Cost $1,600,000 Total Annual Project Cost $32,700,000 Annual Water Production 60,000 afy (Includes 10,000 afy of existing WF21 production) Unit Cost of Water $545 /af (does not include cost to pump water out of the basin and assumes well capacity is available) Total Project Net Unit Cost - year 2002 $617 /af (inflated @ 2.5%for 5 years) Phase I, 50,000 afy of new water supplies in 2002 Phase II, 75,000 afy of new water supplies in 2010 Phase III, 100,000 afy of new water supplies in 2020 a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 26, 1997 p2411 Thomas P. Logan hone:p14198 p Deputy Director �Tng addreea-. Citizen's Bureau of Investigation P.O.Boa B127 Fountain Way,,rA P.O. Box 10911 927288127 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 straw:address: 108"95a Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 927M7018 Dear Mr. Logan: Thank you for your letter of June 16, 1997 wherein you discuss your issues Mamba, concerning Proposition 218 and its impact on the newly adopted user fees. Agand. 0 1 shared your letter with our General Counsel Tom Woodruff. Our position is e�naa as follows: Meneim area Beene PP&* - We agree with Mr. Grimm that sewer fees are exempt from the voting cmvas requirements of Prop. 218, but must follow the notification procedures. Fountain Valley Fullerton Hunungtnn Beach - Prop. 218 is effective for fees and charges on July, 1, 1997, not the Indna Le Habra day after the election. L.a Palma Les Alamitos Newport Beech - Although Section 5's effective date provides that the provisions of the Orenga 9 P Placentia article referring to assessments becomes effective the day after the - Be=Ana Sea/$each election, unless otherwise provided, Section 6 (d) notes that all fees Btammn and charges shall comply as of July 1, 1997. TuaGn Villa Park rasa undo Regarding the concerns listed under paragraph (4) of your June 16 letter, :ounty of Orange although Prop. 218 was not in effect at the time the user fee ordinances were adopted, these fees met all of the requirement which you have listed. 3ohm y Metal= Canape Maae These user fees are based on the operating costs, capital costs and debt Barden Cf M/dwey My service for each of the sanitation districts. Costs are allocated on the water Olatriate proportional cost of the service on the basis of flow. A public hearing was held on May 28, 1997, prior to the adoption of the ordinances and protests kvine Ranch were considered at that time. We had both oral and written comments. We did not follow the notification procedure established in Prop. 218 as it is not in effect until July 1, 1997. 4 Public Wa.hc afar and Enviranmantal Management Agency Camr,ncad to Protecting Me Environment Since 7954 ,a Thomas Logan Page 2 June 26, 1997 In closing, let me assure you that the Districts intend to comply with Prop. 216 at all times in the future when applicable provisions would apply to actions to be taken regarding fees and charges. Sincerely, Iud (,O�ezeK y Wilson Chief Administrative Officer JAW:cmc H:\WP.DTAWDMIN\2150\WILSONJV WILSON\CORRES�97\062797.L1 4 p w ' m i Y �^\ H.r y r '� •� /� � K--. � _ y 1. R{ ,Y .. r Y ♦♦, 4 IS- . I I l 0 Southern California 's water resources are embattled. Can we ensure a plentiful supply into the next century? I 'V H I $ K E Y is for drinking. and water is Traditionally, Southern Californians hate taken water ( for fighting about: )lark Twain quipped a cen- for granted—at least since 1913. when w'illiam >lulholland J I nm ago—but he could have made the statement unveiled the 230-mile aqueduct that brought a torrent of this morning. The drought may be only a mem- water here from the Eastern Siena. later. aqueducts were orv. but listen to what San Diego County Water Authority' built to bring in water from the Colorado River and the spokesman?laurice Luque has to sac: -Water is a matter of vast Sacramento Delta. That plentiful imported water tmns- survival. It will only become a bigger more critical issue as formed the and Southern California landscape into a lush. we near the year 20110.- green environment. Joly, 1[gar1 Ill' Utnfrs 2J r L The bad news, affording to ex- longer,' tern Gewe, DWP's chief of pens such as Charles White, chief of water resources, says. a � the Southern District of the California Department of Water Resources, is[hat Competition for water -�-'• -water supplies will diminish over the There's another side to the coin, of next 20 years.' At the same time, our course. And the problems start with z population is growing: The state pro- our biggest source of water: the Col- jeas that, by 2020. there will be near- orado River. Turn on a tap in'the ` ly 50 million Californian, up from 30 Southland, and it's Colorado River F million in 1990. water that's likely to Bow because The result'DWR predicts that "by more than 5 MAF of the river's water 2020, without improved management pours into the state annually. The _ and additional facilities, annual shon- Colorado River is central to the irri- ages of 3.7 to 5.7 million acre-feet will gation of the Southland, supplying occur in avenge water years. Annual up to 60 percent of our water. _ drough[-year shortages could increase to 7 to 9 MAE' u^,r,.,•_emu-- ' One acre-foot is 326,000 gallons—sufficient to satisfy a Southern California family of four for a year—so if the sure were to come up 3.7 MAF shon, that would be very dramatic," - - says Brian Thomas. assistant chief of planning and resources for the Metropolitan Water Dis- trict, a mammoth agency that supplies 60 percent of the waterused by 16 million Southern Cal- - ' ifontians in 145 cities and 94 un- incorporated communities. Referring to MWD's service area, a mostly urban strip run- ning from Ventura County to the Mexican border, Thomas says, "If we did nothing to pre- vent it, by 2020 we proper a 1 MAF shortage. That would Insurance policies: The Eottside Reservoir(page 22), now being built near Hemet, will hold 800,000 mean a 20 percent cutback. acre-feet of water, enough to supply Southern California for small months. The Roosevelt Golf Course `But we do not expect in Griffith Pork (page 23) is kept Lush and green with water fmm sources like the reclamation plant shortages,` he hastens to add. near the City of Industry(above);shown are the gate valves to the primary sedimentation tanks. The "The Metropolitan Water Dis- California Aqueduct (top), vast and beautiful almost beyond measure,stretches more than 230 miles trier is taking steps today to from the Eastern Siena to LA. (the safely line is to help anyone who might fall in the water). meet tomorrow's needs.` Much the same optimism is voiced California is now facing mcreasing use Colorado River water—Arizona, by officials of the giant Los Angeles pressure to live within the 4.4 MAF of Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Department of Water and Power,which Colorado River water it was appor- and Wyoming.--objected. Now Nevada alone provides water for a 465-square- coned long ago by acts of Congress and and Arizona are pondering how they mile area. "We believe that we have court decisions. For decades,California could better use the surplus water that adequate water supplies for at least routinely has used more than its allot- California takes. Neither state currently the next 20 years—hopefully much ment, and none of the other states that uses its full entitlement, and both are 2 4 Airives Jell/Allesl Ill% River has been reduced because of Boodplains. DWP has agreed to small- . grave environmental problems, in- er cuts but has dug in its heels over cluding salinity Intrusion caused by the full 13 percent reduction. - / overpumping and sharp declines in DWP's concern is that the science some native animal species. Delta isn't far enough along to know boo' water has annually provided as much water is needed to reduce dust. much as a MAP of water to the San "We have a responsibility to solve the Joaquin Valley and points as far dust problem: the department's Gewe south as San Diego. says. "but if we lose the water that's No one knows for sure if and proposed for Owens Valley dust con- ' - when the delm's water Row will re- trot, we'll have to find new sources to turn to normal. Until it does, its cus- make up that loss.' tomers—including MWD,which ta- And because DWP gets First i ibs ditionally has gotten up to 2 RAF on MWD water—ifs entitled to as Li^ of delta water annually—face mas- much as 24 percent of all water MV D om�..: . sive cutbacks. In one scenario, gets-that statement makes other wrier MWD sees its delta water dropping authorities in Southern California(such to as little as 600,000 acre-feet per as those of San Diego and Beverly growing fast—Las Vegas is the nation's year—and leaving a large shortfall that Hills) nervous because MWD is their fastest-growing city, and Phoenix isn't would have to be made up elsewhere. primary supplier of water. Most years. far behind.And some experts fear that But the water agency that has been DWP takes only a fraction of what it neither state is approaching the issue hit the hardest is the one least depen- could from MWD. but if It gets less in a spirit of compromise. dent on either Colorado River or Sacm- Owens Valley water, it likely would The threat of imminent water sup- mento Delta water: the Los Angeles need more MWD water. ply reduction took an upward turn last DWP. Historically, more than two out December when U.S. Secretary of the of every three cups of water that Grounds for OptiMiSM Interior Bruce Babbitt declared: "It is poured into Los Angeles originated in Despite the increased competition for ex- clear that surplus(Colorado River)water the Eastern Sierra, Together, Mulhol- isting water. many experts nonetheless will not be available indefinitely to meet land's 1913 aqueduct, a 105-mile ex- are downright upbeat about Southern demands beyond the 4.4 million acre- tension to Mono lake built in 1940,and California's water future. -There's plen- feet entitlement of California." a second aqueduct to Owens Valley that ty of water out there to satisfy Southern When will Cahfomia's take be re- opened in 1970 brought in nearly California's needs," flatly asserts Elmer duced? Nobody knows.Jerry Zimmer- 400,000 acre-feet of water to Los An- Keen, professor emeritus of geography man. executive director of the state's geles each year—and the city total at San Diego State. Colorado River Board, an agency that water consumption is just 600,000 acre- Sandra Postel,director of the Glob- represents California in discussions of feet. But the Mono Lake supply has al Water Policy Project.echoes that op- river issues with neighboring states and been curtailed by 80 percent since en- timism: "There's no question that there's the federal government, says, 'Exact- vironmenml groups Bled suit,and folks ample water in California.The problem ly when the decrease takes effect de- in the Owens Valley have been push- is that we keep chasing new supplies. pends upon the conditions of the river, inA for large-scale curs too. and that's a no-win game. In the end. the Secretary of the Interior(who an- The beef in Owens Valley is dust. it just depletes the aquatic environment. nually determines how much water Four million tons of salty particulates That's why the solution is to make bet- can be drawn off),and the agreements annually blow off the dry ground in ter use of the water we now have." reached by the various states that op- the valley, and residents have pursued Couldn't we just take the salt out erate the system.' action through the Great Basin Unified of the Pack and that wav have plenty But the odds are high that,sooner Air Pollution Control Board to restrict of water?Futunsts have long pointed to rather than later, California's share of DWP's siphoning of water from a large desalination as the cure for our water Colorado River water will dip. area of land DWP owns in the Eastern woes—but is such an idea feasible?De- Up north,meanwhile,Southern Cal- Siena. The Control Board wants DWP salination plants are operating in the ifomia's share of the water Bow out of to use 13 percent of its Owens Valley Middle East,and there are four in South- the Sacramento Delta and San Joaquin water to irrigate the valley and create em California(one on Catalina, one in Jull/lufssl Ipp' Uppers 25 r >uma Barbant. and m'n in Taut K Diego). but onh one nl the)r ` I Q I I s f e r s fro m is currently in operation I'hr tcchnolog; is pi n'en but ax- g 1- i e u L t e r a L : penMl\e. D\V rice ',.,it(l per acre-foot for MN'1) %eater." r a says lent' Gewe. Corn ell : urban uses ;;, seawater costs 32.000 per acre-toot. Projects noa on[he {: drawing hoards predict that >'jt t r a e t i v e, costs will drop below 51.000. - Eventually the price mar get n-e e d i n g competitive. and then w'e will have a virtually unlimit- ed supply of water. But for no%\ Its not an answer." Ditto for plans to build more dams on Northern Cali- fornia's wild rivers. from the Feather to the Russian it) build aqueducts from Washington nr Liter, al the lour', close. Handing screed feet of soil before entering the Canada: or to h:ml in icebergs from turns a spigot. fills a tumbler.and takes grmndwater. Harding .says. "That's -. points north. In all cases. either the a big gulp of the plants reclaimed :mother Imel of protection. costs are too high or the politics are water. "1\e done it for ve:u'.s." he says. lu.s't how much receded ater is � unrealistic or the science is fundamen- Before sewage flnws out of one produced% L.A. Counly :done getter. talk, Bowed. Northern Californians ce- ul the cuuntyB 10 rccyding plants. it ales 2111.1)1N1 acre-feel cerrlp. al an J%. hemently fight dams. for instance.and undergoes extensive pnn'essing. ful- erage cost of 5120 to 51.10 per acre- experts say that friction would melt an lowed by testing. -NY monitor for I IS foot. Still more reclaimed water is iceberg long before it reached us. constituents. including%hoses. bactc- produced in multiple Orange County. If these kinds of approaches ria. organic compounds such as pes- fixations. and L 4.'s DVT also raper- won't work. what will% Many author- ticides. and radioactive element,.' ales recycling plants. "U'e are confi- ities are hopeful that strategies such Handing says. 'V c remove all coma- dent that IN., is a satisfactory and eat- r as water recycling. bunking, and con- minunts. and what:+ left at the end of nnmical wa% to expand our water serration will extend our present the process is high-quality water. I ,upply." DN'P's Gewe sans. water resources. drink it because its a showy demon- -Reclaimed %rater is the ware ul' rr stralion of our confidence in the water the future." DRIt,Whileear,. -N'e be- Water Retycling we produce here." liece that thcrc,a recl:nnation potential "Recycling. banking. and consen'ation Even so. the state health depart- of up w I NIAF :mnu:dh': which is a are the only new sources of wane for men% asked Rattling to put a halt In hig chunk of urban Southern Califor- Southem California."says Lute Harding. his public quaffing of recycled water nia's current consumption of 3.i MAR water recycling coordinator for the Ihecause. he says. "They feared it gale p��+ Los Angeles County sanitation dis- people the wrong idea. The fact is, water Banking trick. Handing unravels the paradox this water does no[ become drinking It boggles the minds of ordinary' cili- jn of how to squeeze more drops out of water in your house." zens to watch millions of gallons of today tightening water.supply on his When water leaves a recycling runoff%%'a[cr pour into the Pacific dur- public tours of the water reclamation plant. .smile of it Roes directly to large ing he:trr slornhs. Recently experts plant near the intersection of the (i1) irrigation cumomers—golf courses. have taken step,tu capture w:ter dur- ' and 605 freeways. Pointing to the cemeteries. and parks—but most is ing periods of surplus :cod save it for p. wastewater Bowing into the plant. he used to recharge local groundwater times of scarcity. For example. a i I t- a What come, in here is disgust. supplies, meaning that it's put back mile-lot 2-mile-wide reservoir de- - •'%says. ` K PP 1• P K• 1. ij.. ing—no doubt about that.- into the ground -It percolates through signed to hind RUo.UI)u acre-feet of 26 urn ore JUI) /Ia f Y11 191- water is now under construction by for example—and use the water when use of groundwater storage facilities in SIW'D near Hemet in Riverside County. we need it.- Kern and Orange Counties. This is enough water to meet Plans are also afoot to investigate -We believe that water banking Southern California's needs for several trapping rain runoff from the Los An- during wet seasons will play an in- months.BIWD:s Thomas sa):s. -We will geles Riser—It is estimated that as much creasing role in meeting the area's fill it during times of abundance—we as I50.000 acre-feet could be captured water needs: Thomas says. -Therds could easily have filled it last winter, during a mine year—and to make wider great potential here.' The only problem: Water banking is expensive. The Hemet reservoir alone cost 51.9 billion, and billions more will be spent on other banking projects. -But making these invest- ments[odav is how we will meet to- morrow's needs.- Thomas says. 1 Water Conservation As promising as water banking and * •'eT� recycling are. probably the biggest contributor to meeting future water needs is the old-fashioned practice of e�r >w rbx as' getting by with less. 'Conservation will play an increasing role in how ' we meet our water needs.- DWP's Gewe predicts. II i Gewe is nor directing his remarks to the daily water-use patterns of or- dinary citizens bemuse homeowners and other urban and suburban water �. `. users have taken remarkably suc- cessful steps to curtail water con- sumption. For instance,today s DWP n +": customers use 100.000 fewer acre-feet than they did a decade ago. despite considerable population growth. -in effect. we've turned back our water rx' •~' .$" usage two decades,' Gewe says. "In the drought, our customers learned they could live well with less.' r Water use per mpim has fallen and stayed down as homeowners. land- lords, and businesses have imple- ' mcmed a range of water conservation programs, such as insmlling low-Row toilets and planting drought-resistant lawns. -Nobody wants to put water k i d ' •1: � down the drain needlessly.- Gewe says. -Give people good alternatives. and they will conserve water" The hitch.though.is that about 80 l a percent of all water consumed in Cal- ifornia is used in agriculture, and r' "farmers haven't been given an incen- feet of Colorado River water annually fight has shifted to Sacramento." sacs the to invest in conservation.- says San- from the Imperial Irrigation District. CCSD political scientist Erie. That s dra Postel of the Global Water Policy "We are seeking to buy water that where decisions will be reached." For Project. Most fame buy water at whole- Imperial County's farmers save by f al- now', though, most politicians are steer- sale rates—paying as little as S10 per lowing better farming techniques.' ing well clear of this touchy battle and acre-foot—and there haven't been Luque says. Some of the cash paid by hoping that,somehow. the parties will sound economic reasons to invest in San Diego for the water would be used work out their own compromises. water-conserving drip-irrigation equip- in implementing agrarian water conser- None of these programs aims to ment or to line canals and ditches to vation techniques such as drip irriga- shut down farms. The goal instead is minimize losses. tlon.So the water savings would be real, to use urban dollars to invest in tech- But now that's changing. "Water and San Diego would get the surplus. nology and infrastructure designed to transfers from agricultural to urban The swap sounds simple, but it more effectively use water in agricul- uses are very attractive to cities that promptly unleashed a brouhaha in the ture. and then to shift the savings to need to find new sources of water," Coachella Valley Water District, which thirsty urban areas. says Steve Erie, a political scientist at has demanded more water,citing a 1931 There are plenty of sensitivities the Cniversiry of California, San Diego. agreement giving the Palo Verde Irriga- involved. "Water transfers need to A case in point is San Diego, tion District in Blythe first call on Col- occur without disruption to the state's which now finds itself nervously orado River water as it enters the state, agricultural communities,- says Jerry watching the Southland's dwindling followed by—in order—the Yuma water Zimmerman of the state's Colorado water imports. "If we didn't import project, the Imperial Irrigation District, River Board. But there is nonetheless water, we could only satisfy a popu- Coachella,MWD, and San Diego. wide agreement, in the words of lation of 130,000," says San Diego "You use what you can for benefi- MWD's Thomas, that "transfers will County Water Authority's Maurice cial purposes and,by law, the rest Rows play an increasing role in how we Luque. 'Our population is 2.7 million down for use by other agencies,- says meet our water needs. The potential and growing. We know we need to Tom Levy, general manager and chief in this area is large." find a secure, reliable source of wirer." engineer of the Coachella Valley Water r With imports dropping, how can District.'If IID reduces its water use,the TgMarrpws water San Diego possibly obtain more water? Secretary of the Interior has no choice Add up the balance sheet, and is By looking next door, it turns out. The but to deliver that water to Coachella.' Southern California's water future wet San Diego County Water Authority Case closed?Not exactly. III) and or dry?There are unquestionably hur- managed to find water for itself in San Diego have launched a campaign dles, but that has always been the neighboring Imperial County by to get their way and, at this juncture, case here—an and land that is irri- proposing a deal to buy 200,000 acre- angry voices are everywhere. "The gated only because people such as 3A en a "'S Sir` 4 b 1 r V �T ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER I SECTION PAGE DATE SUBJECT The orange County Register COLUMNS Sunday, Jane 29, 1997 PUBLIC POLICY: U.S. manufacturing base will take another hit from new EPA standards. f you were disposed to being fa- urged President Clinton to recall the cetious, you could say the EPA's ERIC PETERS EPA's new clean standards and cor- proposed new "clean air" stan- rect their major defects. Failure to do dards for ozone and particulate ►Mr. Peters is a veteran Washington automo. so,he observes,will permanently matter—English translation: tive writer. alienate working men and women and smog and soot—contain both pluses doom Democratic chances of retaking and minuses. the House and Senate. On the one hand,the standards man- mates the national compliance costs of Officials at the Departments of Com- date significantly higher utility bills its tougher ozone restrictions at only merce,Transportation and Agriculture for American rate payers and signifi- SW million a year, Ohio'$Environ- as well as the Small Business Adminis- cantly higher price tags on a wide mental Protection Agency projects the tration have echoed Dingell's warnings range of manufactured goods for annual capital expenditures for Ohio in private meetings with White House American consumers. utilities alone will exceed S730 million officials. On the other hand,they almost cer- a year. Nevertheless,EPA Administrator tainly will result in fewer jobs, lower The added expenditures will boost - Carol Browner adamantly defends the wages and less economic growth. Ohio utility rates as much as 17 per- proposed new rules—particularly her Don't take my word for it. Take the cent in some areas,and force an aver- agency's attempt to regulate particu- word of President Clinton's own Coun- age increase of 7 percent throughout late matter(soot) as tiny as 2.5 mi- cil of Economic Advisers, who predict the Buckeye State. crons (about one-fortieth the width of a the national costs of reaching full at- Ohio manufacturers also are in a human hair). tainment with the EPA standards will bind. G & S Titanium,a company in This despite the fact that the federal total upwards of 560 billion—far ex- the northeast sector of the state, des- government's own figures show some ceeding the$1 billion value of the perately needs to expand to satisfy the 83 percent of all such emissions are benefits it projects. Even in Washing- demands of it current customers. generated by "fugitive dust,"which ton,D.C.,a 60 to 1 ratio of cost to ef- Right now, it's using the most modem comes from such benign sources as fectiveness is totally out-of-whack. technology available and complies farmers plowing fields,animals with Indeed,if science and sound econom- with all Federal and local environmen- dandruff and pollen released from is policy served to guide EPA policy ml standards. It won't be able to com- Flowers,weeds and other fauna. Most recommendations,the agency's cur- ply with the new EPA roles for a sim- of the remaining 17 percent comes rent clean-air agenda would never pie reason: the technology for comply- from burning wood, stoked-up barbe- have seen the light of day. ing isn't available. ques and idling internal combustion While virtually every state would As Ohio Gov. George engines that already have reduced lose under the draconian EPA propos- ge V. Voinovich emissions by more than 98 percent. als, some would lose more than others. pointed out to a House Commerce Since the nation's ambient air quab- The economies of such disparate Committee hearing last month: ty has improved exponentially over the states as Ohio, Virginia, Illinois, Ken- "These proposals are creating a Catch- past two decades one can only wonder tucky, Minnesota, Indiana,West Vir- 22. If they (businesses] do not expand, about the EPA's motives in pursuing ginia and Missouri all would receive they risk losing customers and market standards that are virtually impossible sledgehammer blows from tighter share. If they expand and the new to meet. Rather than voluntarily cut standards that studies show would pro- standards are implemented,they risk back its staff and budget and earn duce no overall measurable improve- being out of compliance." grateful applause from U.S. taxpayers, ' ment in the nation's air quality. Rep.John Dingell, D-Mich.,who the agency apparently has decided to Ohio is a particularly good case in long has fretted about the erosion of try its hand at regulating areas and point. Although the federal EPA esti- America's manufacturing base, has items that literally defy regulation. �T UHANUE UUUN I Y SANI IA I IUN UIS I HIU 16 r , e NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Date Subject D. C. loeko 5 9/1/,�7 .; w. South Coast Water District :seeks merger .. ., The Orange County Register several special districts In However, ' any. consolfdatiditrf Directors of the South Coast Orange County. The bill needs application fled before tgdi �( Water District, one of five s e-., approval from the state Senate would be considered by LafcQt p and Gov. Pete Wilson before be- clay districts providing water - P coming law. and sewer services to Dana Dana Point last week applied' Point,applied Monday to merge The-bill proposes to consols-: to merge the South Coast Water with the neighboring Laguna date- the Laguna Beach and District and the Dana Point Saniv. Beach and Capistrano Beach wa- South Coast water districts by Vary District. Some city officials ter districts. Dec.31, 1998. It also proposes to say a South Coast merger with- The application, filed with the consolidate the Capistrano the Laguna Beach Water Disirtor.- Local Agency Formation Com- 1 Beach Water District and the would be inefficient for Dana ' mission,beat the July 1 deadline Dana Point Sanitary District un- Point residents because 70 pert;, set in Assembly Bill 556, which der the city of Dana Point by the cent of the new district's,custom+'- - proposes the consolidation of same date. ers would live in Laguna Beach. C ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS r NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS � i Name of Pa r Section Page Date Su t lln f e�(S R 3� NIDPCtl Dcin� AT Thr— I. . B8n' THURSDAY,JULY 3.1997 LOS ANGELES TIMES EDITORIALS ell d •t idden :Danger at. the aeh, , . . Sacramento;should mandate health standards for the waters When you go to the ocean shore,it's easy to Nor do six other coastal California counties: tell whether the beach sand is clean and free of Contra Costa, Del Norte, Humboldt, Karin, junk or hazards:Thesame cannot be Bald for the '• Mendocino and Sonoma. water.The water may seem clean,but it in fact 'This situation would be corrected by AS 411, j may be polluted by a variety of organisms that authored by state Assemblyman Howard can came a range of health problems,from bore Wayne (D-San Diego).The legislation would throats to dysentery.The key to safe beaches is establish uniform state health standards for to have clear standards of water purity and to beach waters and require regular monitoring. advise bathers promptly when those standards Another measure.that merits legislative are exceeded,or to close the beaches altogether approval is SB 499, aimed at the more basic when there is a threat - problem of pollution such as street and highway But first, the water must be tested. Amaz• grime that reaches the ocean through storm ingly, California has no comprehensive state- . drains. The measure, sponsored by Sen. Dede wide standard for water safety and no require- '. Alpert (D-Coronado),would direct state agen- went that waters be regularly monitored. . I Iles to develop a plan to control this runoff in Fortunately for Southern Californians, the coastal areas., major counties do a good Job in this regard.Los California's swimming, surfing and diving Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties have waters are a vital recreational and economic ♦ such programs.But Ventura County still has no resource.The state has a compelling Interest in regular monitoring program, the Natural assuring their safety and taking prompt action Resources Defense Council reported this week. whenever there is a health threat' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Nafne of Paper Section Page Date Subject D-C . Q>2 i S��/' DANA POINT Two Capistrano Beach Water District administrators pleaded not guilty Thursday to Charges that they ordered employees to dump untreat- ed sewage in a vacant lot about 100 yards from where San Juan Creek empties into the ocean. During arraign- ' ant In Orange County So- �eriar Court,water district counsel Paul Meyer said his client also was not guilty. The district and operations manager Steven Corey San- cber,Jace 26 criminal com- plaints, including 12 felony accusations. Administrator Dennis Emerson MacLain has been charged with mis- demeanor counts by the Dis- trict Attorney's Office in May. Dan Chanp117141/54-735a (/. ///c-,r5re ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER I SECTION PAGE DATE SUBJECT QG. �it!�is (7pnme � 5 7A,/17 fee voted behind our ,backs s id' beware bureaucratic Should an issue so compelling as a di- fexation with representation. rem increase in fees to local residents r. The Orange County Saulm- be subject to some confirmation vote ' tion District passed a 180 by the majority of the elected officials percent"fee" increase for in the city affected? Should the staff of -Huntington Beach residents; only two county boards be responsible and bring elected members of that city vote on issues like lWpercent fee increases to that district's board.I am a council- the table for more of the public to an- member in the same city and have derstand? never voted on anything that size. If I Shouldn't we, as locally elected offi. had,it would have been after a series cials who sit on regional boards and of public hearings;a number of as. - -commission,bring back to our re- saults by activist groups and a few •spective councils issues when direct comments from my mom and two kids. taxation or fee increases are the result --Many municipally elected officials of our independent action? Is judgment i sit on various county-wide boards and and size of issue the point? : commissions.Two members of the With all the state legislation,Prdpo- I frwtington Beach City Council sit on sition 13 of ages ago and,recently, - Ihe Sanitation District board. They Proposition 218,there still seems to be voted to uphold a staff recommends- a way around giving all the people a tion to increase fees to local residents. choice. Their action is binding on all 181,000 - Cave Garofalo ` .residents. They only represent two of - ' Huntington Bea seven elected'officials. . e..to Beach - ,Mr.Garofalo'a a dry muncilmember in j II - They rest their rase on the informs. Huntington Beach. ,r titr given to them cmmty,ete[t. ax.. .a•%.:• j.s... .siuc -iti� I From the toilet to the tap? ibe tlry of San Diego Foos mat'repmifN'how a.0 wmermnllhemnpewsrgFmm San Dim" Xmm en Form or— 1 - :eosin MIlCitYOMmisaymemanyneatmenroroees:e:von eBeaHNywioahe neCnaiare IWamaLnFWt 'nrde,m the waste whom,teres what the comment adoration and pmdiotia.Maaeu who mYil: Prealama wan.wm rmmro Trewmam win n 1 q� Pell"' laed'�lo� plmr—� i Y selikent9albmef i6�XeI �manssentttoa:e fBIli11�PP / ®%,wie. e s 1 it Pow II wm"ma Oxodmoohm mWlmatla WdX�2_ aNewale: ly0r"n r'eWua;txae". y. !�sewed der, wuv yllll s .. eq IY w+9eatlminaw IeOeNil4l hey. &Trani:_",. s'+nse .. stiore F s'wasomemborthe M1P _d dwMw Nwm Gry Water.- F &Nieman.Wn[ Y',rP Xi.lY.e' - (WldlamMr f TwWryRXen UI.MnarW ®rmmdmere ioe-It �e[fedl :Twwa i airy-eesean- �pf61AB _ IAWfi adan :kow—omws omlwkmmdwu.amwm ral orana or vlor;,a wo,y ,� _ aw.how,I i.nm nows r .Ras pp�p. M Q lamwadly"nooeam a , t capon NreNe Resermovandehwia wwarom onwam. 0 w.y,Xmn � mawieswwb e6Pj1Pl pdMk Ia PI:mMam e �eN..:.dn hen %an[wwtrt L. xwiaietl xw.4 r. •-R war` Miam orHlwal.i a- �' 1 esoN.W. %Nrmtlm OlYnfwdon ..ona's.wesso.o....w.s.amwe..«..e.o.v< Water from (gulp !) where? ' City aims to '/1LU.ke vdlNii I aran[.nut we a Enid.n E a system ow met T fall.m N pa mime e y mans to a Wants promde We.habitat,and meeNeeoewr adv crescent W�16e Wild,e4 sewage drinkable ter roan date. o Gap y id a d. farm of cansmm�p puI d de weds, Tab Repunikatkn donnish shy the rp"m stWYiseapemea to I.far demands, They me a rot[eNmlopkal wed crow tlodrnk ngtie dour o oak,aid w 1"1.' INedme Toes hem[ove. 'amid rolummce to drink said. to do is to dacummt Wtface:Gagha.Ne Byllad,rYn BtlIM what was ice Inwake. said. 'We i a III tone diamonds.it tha The ymrryhoerpaneaythemomWtnq- iiH P.RSDDAL my 5. o man Diego "Prep[s Inad aysasuha.a thing escuu be Prime serape Baler me day,the cry proms" u entsjaserompleteuymechaddimly dm 1.vaned husso,wery Wyal weer recama- Pii"e William County.Va. weort Nu mmdown prove rd it..o that id,w%mr makes very pond sou:said Dr. It has hrose l tl son eIW3ves adj Day mY re wake wave, to nkdn tmleis and dnw tie ha them a Mod" eiilmmae.,Dieu merdm,of ported negative oo 111 Dwim.err Wastewater rMu ii TI sale to wink. Was. cwmY Metlpal 5ockay,wNN wporu the roger,director w c""Diego's Was[ewtm 0.- TM Bests at the rnv's smapuak ester rr itlea. Ilar[nim,. pankshern pan[mOe Sm Pashoo Valley were -1'se reken the uwe der and rant ma tha Despite cry olfidaa'hared.that the re ...dlanea ire,mark monms aiHemock sae shod. NmRyd waver as are,to.Cory ComdWnan The cite hopes such highly t.red waste Gmpmeo aM by well iss neon his Bruce Henderson has eased rmmrm. dip boom chromium,9m Diego's draw by month with torsions Na first show ro nations In a let,.to rise city.ha h—p the upwlfe ,he one of 2WI in whas would be[Ian tin,suet, a a more,r n re, toe mremwe 11.1.1 ra m plan to a'Dr.Franandmum"mpwaiwn[. eewiy,wrw re"Clea,Protein C in dmw. or. and to a(ideal court Where had, mom. Paul GagaMo,mare",or the MenaoWun -We faker mr,me MeraorpniaRw mad shm Hdder.o maned Nodded,:>m Diepns milt be Waste ,Deoremeo[remea non d ahot. we anal[ham.'ha and.' m we use re per-tad. wwittmp•gash piµ• e eme s mnlame i N rn e ulu of Nimmons mods mad Weres..a by film,soy miaaon 1 xutlim the poisms that were kit.Md men we W them 'Iles....11v n,nnnnm drum a iechmi.a- d.h— d kill Oahe amm who themes.- y tr SarMATHI-Paagai B-6 THE S.SN DIE4o ANION-TPJBME.SUNDAY.JULY 6.1997 Ir — i C ( , l Y. yy iii Yt ` J ya � � t All shook up:A vial of sewage water is mixed with a chemical •- that will make nitrates visible. Then the level of nitrates will , ' ` T, z be determined with a spectrometer and an ultraviolet light. "at city's legal battle with the federal Water government over sewage treat- f ment. �- a It's alread barn done Henderson is known for success- Y g fully challenging a federal mandate na to u g g upgrade city sewage treatment for ?'% in a county In Virginia and (or his failed effort to put the Continued from B-1 stadium expansion on the ballot. U.S. District Judge Ruth Brew- "We have to look at whether ster responded, "It appears to me scotruw+smunamtnwmpwt we're being forced to participate in (citizens) are being infinitely ex- a health experiment without our posed to greater toxins from the The ozone zone:Daniel Smith,operations supervisor at the consent,"Henderson said at a hear- drinking water they get from the city test plant, takes a watersamplefrom a device that ing that was intended to end the Colorado River:' aerates water with ozone,killing microorganisms. A total of 187 municipalities dis- charge treated sewage into the Col- orado upstream from where San Water Reclamation Plant in Univer- Diego Chapter of the Sierra Club. Diego takes it for drinking water. sity City. Instead of irrigating says the repurffication program David Spath, chief of the state's plants with it or dumping it into the makes economic sense because it division of drinking water and envi- ocean the city would treat it even will provide a locally controlled ronmental management, said stud- more. source of water. It also will cut ies an far have shown San Diego's Fourteen m18ion gallons a day of pollutants discharged into the idea to turn sewage into pouble this super-treated effluent would ocean,she said. water will work. then be piped 23 miles into the San On the other hand, Elmer Keen, 'oL "Right now, there's nothing to Vicente Reservoir, north of lake- a member of the County Water Au- lead us to believe that the project side. thority's repurified water review that they propose would not be a Finally, the mix would undergo committee, argues that the water safe one, said Spath,whose depart- traditional treatment at the Alvara- will cos[about $932 per acre-foot, ment conditionally approved the do Filtration Plant before Bowing compared with$550 to$600 it the program three years ago. "The from San Diegans'faucets. city got water from farmers in the treatment that they're proposing City sewer users face higher bills Central Valley.In addition,he said. and the (ail-safe mechanisms that to pay :he $152 million cost of the repurification process will gen- I� t they plan to put in place are signifi- building an advanced water treat- erate more sludge, produce more cant and provide a significant factor ment plant and a pipeline to San truck traffic and use more energy. Paul Gagllardo: "Wecan. . of safety." Vicente, Operating costs are esti- "Economically and environmen- provide safe, reliable and The project would involve waste mated at$4 million a year. tally," he said, "it just simply does cost-effective water." water treated at the North City Lori Saldana,who heads the San not pencil out:' July 8, 1997 Toxic Waste Use as Fertilizer on Distribution: Farms Reported Don McIntyre Fmrii AvociareAPims Blake Anderson (�EATITE—Toxic heavy mews, Judy Wilson Schemicals and radioactive Ed Hodges/Chris Dahl wastes are being recycled asfertil- David Ludwin Izer and spread over farmers'fields nationwide—and there is no fed- .-when it goes into our silo,it's a Bob Ooten eral law requiring that they be hazardous waste." said Bay Zinc's Mike Peterman listed as ingredients, the Seattle president, Dick Camp. "When it Times reported. comes out of the silo,it's no longer Gary Streed The issue came to light in the regulated The exact same ma- Jean Tappan central Washington town of terial." Michelle Tuchman Quincy, population 4.000, when Federal and state governments Mayor Patty Martin led an mvesti- encourage the recycling, which Nancy Wheatley gation by local farmers concerned saves money for industry and con- Tom Woodruff about poor yields and sickly cattle. serves space in hazardous-waste "It's really unbelievable what's landfills. happening, but its true," Martin The substances found in recy- Layne Baroldl told the newspaper, which pub- cled fertilizer, include cadmium, Mike Moore lished a series about the practice on lead,arsenic,radioactive materials Thursday and Friday. - and dioxins, the Times reported. Until now, the state Department The wastes come from incineration of Agriculture sampled fertilizers of medical and municipal wastes, only to see if they contained silver- and from heavy industries. Used levels of beneficial substances. But the state is currently testing a cross-section of fertilizer products to A- 7-1-(xs see if they threaten crops,livestock -7/ .7 /y.) or people, the Seattle Poet-inte0l- gencer reported Friday. "The key question is what twdcs am,w it were,along for the ride in fertilizers,"said Tom Fitzsimmons. director of the state Department of Ecology. Use of industrial waste as a fertilizer ingredient is a growing national phenomenon, the Times reported In Gore, Okla, a uranium-proc- easing plant gets rid of low-level radioactive waste by licensing it as a liquid fertilizer and spraying it over 9,000 acres of grazing land. At Camas, Wash., lead-laced waste from a pulp mill is hauled to farms and spread over crops des- tined for livestock feed. In Masse City,Wash.,dark pow- der from two Oregon steel mills is poured from rail cars into silos at Bay Zinc Co. under a federal haz- ardous waste storage permiL Then it is emptied from the silos for use as fertilizer.The newspaper called the powder a toxic byproduct of steel-making but did not identity it ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS V DATE SUBJECT NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE Legislation signed easing sewer-disirict unification The Orange County Register. Gov. Pete Wilson on Wednes- day signed legislation clearing the way for the merger of nine Orange County sewage districts. The measure, by Assembly- man Scott Baugh, B-Huntington Beach,changes state law so that all the new district's customers can be represented an its board of directors. The next step toward consoli- dation will be for the Orange County Sanitation Districts to ap- ply for consolidation of the nine districts into one governing board under the local Agency Formation Commission. Judy Wilson,chief administra- tor for the sanitation district,ex- pects an application will be filed in September.She hopes f.AFCO will hold a hearing by January, when the bill becomes law, and allow thenew board to takeoffice by July 1998. The sanitation district serves about 2.2 million customers in the north and central parts of the" county, including Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach and unincorporated areas. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE DATE SUBJECT f m :TALK SHOW EI Torlo airport rears lb head in Kurt Pringle's bill R"reptsbUcan kssmblyman Jim Morrissey has every reason to be concerned about his re-election. But his worries should stem from his constituents and not the politi- cal game playing by the Democratic lhadership in the Assembly.At election 130e,Morrissey,as;well as the rest of i$p Republican assemblymen and women who represent Orange County, ' W l have to explain their "yes" vote on Assemblyman Curt Pringle's bill This bill applies only to Orange , County. Why? This bill has no listed gypport other than its author, Curt eembly.only y? This bill cleared after e the Democratic Madership allowed it. Why?This bill mll eliminate (only iu"Orange County) , oly elected independent special water'.• and sanitary districts without a vote bry the residents who elected them. When at a loss for answers, follow Xe money; in this case, right to El Tests amd'the development at the Ma- tine Air Station. Eliminate the districts mid you eliminate the control of basic ! infrastructure, water and sewer, at the level that is closest to the people. Be- fore development can proceed at El Toro, each of the affected independent districts that surround the base would have to give their approval. Given the opposition in South Orange County this bill is needed—by the developers. Art DeeoB Los Alamitos -Mr. DeBolt is a director of the Rossmoor/tos Alamitos Area Sewer District. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS NAME OF PAPER SECTION PAGE DATE SUBJECT Raising Dam would Cap Flood Control Efforts,. to -a l By STlF YGRAD thekids,ora trip to the mounuim,".il: 1 nra oars sorry[ Spms;id'7twauldgetridofia.ylr alai Pretty big expense" 1 ,.■Tamel Speq can tpomtto,. yr f Thedam-rattingls thelmalptlec&, ■the Pmdo Dam ona map,or of the mammoth Santa Am flood - L explam the hydmlogKW '... ' control project,a il3-billion effort shencebe inda -'medat protecting whatfederaL_: i472-million plan to mtse its walls. I officials describe as potentially the Bmthe Huntmgmn Beachomtt -v' mmtvumerable Dowd plain weatof i manager is acutely aware ofhowlt-.-4 the Miatictlppi. i}+p affects his pocketbooL if the dame The long-delayed elevetlon of thes•),v raised,he and teas oftbouszndv of[ 'dam won a big boot earlar thle.'am E Yatherhomeowners&mgmthevssz. " month when the US.Army Coroahs Win Ana River flood plain will no, Engineers agreed tapay my'.' longer be required to purchase costly additional f100 million of the cos4 ai w Bond Insurance. ? 4kOi �.' St.y,raining its-hare from 30%to 50% fV^. '1payi500ayear Tbatwould ' " Thecomtyisnowoptimisticthe ". cover a cot of Christmas presents for � v Please me DAM,B4 DAM_ ` q $At�B< the�Pmdo to determine where flooding wow¢ re. L/i1f1�Y/1� t u J�� reduced flood dangers m; be most severe Property oaoma m. Riverside Freeway—from 566 feet .r ombal and made. zmm that waved emnawate more above see level to 5K4 feet The � r �e ��� m„ Wm a foot of water are regimM m r�N°vemenG rerlttlte the ecgiosi. G�dvved lrom ffi s�-i:.Wp-s+ r• i�a�.i.aej Bud the imps Fier de : 't . : ... 1:' .4r (�P of more than 1.'f00 acres of p[o)em WILL he btdl4 but mmeTls' tammd"that Predc could ;a,Zl FIVAagreedmat➢eatoreduce private property that would be etd needed fr®We etaletofnll➢.' nothhrg greets than e70-Year flood; flood lmiaantt Miss in the Bond- flooded when the dam is railed.-.: hmdthe wort < r '•"f1}' ryr('r, aadmgadthatthedamberabect- plain much a 50% because (• Officials have encountered oppo- Toe pl®utofineaee the-tosag - .1 • -r:_ „�. - i.sis the Santo Am flood control project �tlUon from-one eavw�entalisls t�adp of the dam by 50%,r—ed"''j-Gi o most purple,this dam L i i had reached the halfway point' ea: ,.and property owners unwilling to mg the p,eames to release waiei•�1 T'lmanrial leers be®use 0111101 Fla enmple the annual In.M:' ieell their land 6tlU. the most➢ corn the same dos Rive.While the. �ntt• Said Fountain VaDcy acne premftnn on a home values a hopes to have the project mm- riv the River hile tle.�osin iman lahkI. Cdlme. whoae 5150.000dmPpedh®R90u,$=. - 'Fisted by 2005. said William L dtIImg the.@➢ summer, the Santa':: lies m the heart d the Bond F]drldge said the mnwntt re." Zarin,NelouMicwortx director. Am ® nos desmxdvely.wdd m','p�'But it also Was m peace of quhmem would be elmmated al_- It The total met of the dam-rwsmg the iem7 see® and releases from .mko& - tr`Q. together if the county can protect `is estimated^at W million. and Nee®aggay.te theproblm''r:,lR About 40M homeowners along the flood ptam against a 100-year_ jbdme the corps derided m lack m Gffimalaand Neriverlsoverdue theriverarerequiredbythe Fdeml fl� ® — ethmg that can only,m jnesrly $100 million of the cost, the for a great 100-year flood,-which Emergency Management Agmcy to county and stale share was roughly mud muse an estimated $15 bll- have flood lnur la mole than Plain call for the county to raiea. i71%of the total,ar.M million. lion In damage and the deaths m soother Southland ' the elevation of the dam—off the 3Awpeaple. :.., - FEMA detettmna which areas Coruna Fpres-way m Sm Bermr- The increased federal mmnbu- itan now cleans that the Mte oA Aura ly a flood m bridge mskd ice fit haw ° n of wa� pld would dim Canty. Flat north of Ne attl lomt portion m the bill will fall nasty every fridge G the ammtdzte during floods So severe to S= m"', or smelly 50% m minty.submerged much a Garden occur only note a cen the total.Of that the state could pay iik Wem,n cd and Santa Ana they century. 1 killed dozen mpeople thenoverlaying throe 100-year- as Much a $163.5 County ®Wont leaving Good depth+ m mpograpbip C l roam the Orange (:minty Food Comm Dlstrim to pay f70 million f's'�i-�."""--_ ::�J' �Z"�:�t„a��s"h1^^^rl:�•-•'�-d.S�'�tY-ram. A `K r' �• �� •r .i�t` YNV -r SccCM yy��" Wl#rt t l t' YI - t O � Ss ' ri- y - ._ Vf1MIVl,]C %�IJVIv 1 1 0MI41 I M 11U14 UIJ I tilt-, 10 NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name pf Paper •S{eection age Datey S blect �L1 P Pb ���51/7 K Koll Group Files for Bankruptcy ■ Real estate: Firm's Has to nnaecured debt in Its filing, �46daye. 1. but about a third of that Is not In May, KREG repotted a(het, planned BGlso ChIca affected by the bankruptcy, Kau Carter lase of $4.9 million, or 10 project has been delayed attorney Greg Preston sad. [apenis a share,compered with a loss years by legal challe KoU Real Estate Group a f$ T.9 million,or 17 cents,a year ages. ll commercial and residential devel- earher. , oper. Its largest single met Is a ' The mmpnny's stock was re- ByJOHNO'DELL ', planned development adjacent to moved from Nasdaq market Us- TIMMaAITWR1i&R �' '`� "%the environmentally sensitive rem trading Monday and Will be NEWPORT BEACH—Bolea,'t Balm Chico Wellams near,.Hun- sated on fees-active Nasdaq over- Chien devel Hell Bat lv41s ' Ungton Beaeb. ` the-counter markets until the ° The development, which has bankruptcy Is terminated,Preston Group Inc. on Monday filed Its been tied up by environmental # previously announced bankruptcy challenges for nearly 20 years, Is 1 The bankruptcy—which was de- reorganization peUUon in Data- approved for Z400 homes—down mantled by KREG's bondholders— wars, - , . ,. from 6.700 homes In the original lets the Newport Beech-based The financial plan, already ap- plan. realdenUel and commercial Bevel- . proved by 95% of the company'& The delays caused many of opment company pay off its bond bondholders and shareholders, KREG's financial troubles by add- debts at a discount while preserv- calls for$210 million of bond debt ing more than$24 million a year In mg$200 million fa tax benefits that to be swapped for new stock. The interest charges on Ila bonds to the can be used to offset future income plan will give the bondholders a company's debt load. Lazes. . 1 90% stake in company and KREG Chairman Donald M.Koll KREG's major unsecured credl- repays them at an avenge rate of has said he expects the plan to be tore are the individuals and Invest- about 60 cents to the dollar, approved by the court and the ment funds that own the com- KREG listed a total of 9M mil- bankruptcy period to end In about pony a bonds. E` The Evolution of an O County Sanitation Districts of Orange Cou v �L • • • • • • z 1970s 1980s e County Sanitation Districts of Orange County'a 120-ocean ouffall was The '80s ushered in improved treatment cf effluent (treated wastewater) with the noted in 1970 and began operations in 1971. Domestic and industrial discharging a high-quality 50:50 blend of primary and secondary treated wastewater.Thr awaters received primary treatment before being discharged through also implemented a highly effective industrial Source Control Program that would become utfall five miles offshore at a depth of 200 feel onto the San Pedro Shelf. model The increased treatment reduced the amount of solids discharged by 50%and th xudall provided a new rock-covered ar ficial reef habitat that stood in Control Program would reduce the amounts of heavy metals and organic chemicals disc) 0 contrast with the surrounding full,sad-bodom mud habitat kitchens of their 1970'a values. treated wastewater contained high concentrations of heavy metals and The oudall began to serve as a functional artificial reef.Photographic surveys showed it.chemicals that accumulated in the sediments around the oudall.The varied growths of aquatic organisms on the ouffall, including pollutlon-sensitive specie amount of solids discharged created conditions of excessive levels of amount of solids and toxins discharged decreased,Me biologic community around the out! ,gen sulfate and decreased dissolved oxygen. The presence of these to recover The abundance and variety of bodom-living species found around the mdfal in Me sediments caused major changes in the bidogic community that improved and reached natural levels Pollution-sensitive species,absent from the study xJ There were high numbers of a few pollution-tolerant bottom-living '70s,beganto return totheirformer range.Fish diseases were rarely observed as.Diseases.such as fin rot and tumors,were common in fish caught idlheoudall utfall as an Artificial Reef 1ty 'f ill ++S 1990S istrcts The discharge of high-pualily effluent has allowed Me continued recovery of the biological community near the autfall. The levels of contaminants in t istricts sediment confine to decline and are now nontoxic to marine species. Although a'fooWrint'of sediment contaminants exists,they are now at or are near ational natural background levels. Areas nearer the ouffall have higher abundances oforganisms suggesting that the ouffall is enhancing the nearby community Fi iource tissue contaminant levels do not pose a threat to human health. It is concluded(hat human health and the biologic community are being protected, ged to The ouffallconiinueslomatumasanaNficialrcef.Photographs show that the exposed portions of the ouffall are covered by biologic growths and resident Populations exist The ouffall structure itself is found to influence the bottom sediments and thereby affect the bottom-living organisms Predationbygshlivi )e and sure outfall also impacts these organisms As the While the discharge of wastewater has historically negatively impacted the natural environment around the oudall.the continued discharge of high qua began wastewater combined with the ouffall acting as an adificial reef Provides a more complex and diverse habitat than the surrounding sand-mud environme teadily Organisms not normally found in the area now occur at the oulfall.The results a healthy and diverse environment that represents a new'resource-to the pool r in the of Orange County cspoc�, � - eG/23/1997 21:07 310-312-9507 PAID_ R GLASSKAN P.C. PAGE 02/10 PAUL R.GLASSMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 11400 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, 2X° FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 900114 PHONE:(310)312-M5 FAX:(310) 312.2507 June 23, 1997 To: All Orange County Chios In the Subcommittee of Orange County Cities (`The Subcommittee") Re: In Re County of Orange Case No. SA-94-22272JR Settlement Between County of Orange and Merrill Lynch Dear Counsel for Orange County Cities: As many of you have probably heard by now, the District Attorney for the County of Orange has entered Into a $30 million settlement with Merrill Lynch of potential criminal charges. As you may also be aware, the Pool Committee has made demand upon the County for payment of the $30 million as 'litigation proceeds' under the Plan. Attached for your information are copies of the following documents: 1. Press Release from the District Attorney's Office, dated June 19, 1997. 2. Settlement Agreement between the County and Merrill Lynch, June 17, 1997, 3. Letter from Pool Committee Counsel Pat Shea to the County's Bankruptcy Counsel, Bruce Bennett, dated June 20,1997. 1 will be following up on developments with respect to the settlement and will be sending out a further report when I have more information. If you have any questions concerning the settlement or any other matter, please do not hesitate to call ma. '15�w./A , Paul R. Glassman P.C. Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp PRG:cp A-98% 310 312 9507 06-23-97 09:07?M P002 a21 06/23/1997 21: 07 210-312-9507 PAUL R a-ASS7AN P.C. PAGE 03/10 Wlig, 7 13:2L N0.369 MM -sart BY! a-19-07 .10:58AN ;tffMl dV rAOM BM#. 918164411414;9 2f a OFR=OFTM DISTRICT ATTORNEY ORMU CMWry,CAL MMIA NMAGL IL CRP=DwmiCf AT ommy uwRaerA ere.rw� aMraaaaN aa.rr 19,7997 aaaeYY w aa..raer, (ba7aC1 laffaa: 1,/9aFadR Capron ~Rtew. 1714)04.3636 m+.aue ass �,�� Uiaa'ln Aebm�ABdfael R.�pippmoodladglltit Ldrnli LDedilna wuerMro�s,,.i acted so pay 230 bmian m a pmfblRtlma n0lemew afpaAmw dva dem, My 6a paglla of the ff ll+ti of f)etifami a Magid oa ltf af9!Lyanh aottlldm fn.elrloSbmMwaMba>0=V Caaatfdablas3tmpm 199b fa ddidoa, N.rev,o. MMM Laveft frl Wood to faydrmanlpmeeIMICW al and WMY tmddcdk=fflf fit pelmarl favet.ed mu,e Wve%ft at dabtlathe aa� DIa0a0(GWmnla. Atopy ofdn tealama0t agt�t6attteW bflfu medY mi�iaaa m 2k.r/1Med 1mtl>Qpeovima&u moom Lyr4 Uto attahfhdt a pmaahtc aw+�"e.u"� �aaflID►LtulfelhonWoa+ba4am�Pv Oah Create fob+p�asd, aemd'uated.std durJoaal b)adotipotad"A)tfaw>RAlom wffim!d'oill �, ...�e IdOt4 Tbt�mt aad 4i mtmfaOlf eIIMe�tam aognf/ad tobCmpomd loft �aar 0eaay Oabl6'f%tleMAmaaO'aod tSRfemiaAmamq Oewtal on rot unfm! )bola lgam H.aye.r9. Manllf Lq.ehol,Rud is fdl aaapaadion �w�ii nrw. �aa�am m6la�w�. useawaaarr teorr 7La latManfalt flmau@eaaA of a2 Y,yealpwpptlo06y�a1)ltltict ana�ia.a�ae.o Aao:eoy.lJd{Po�Aftamay Geeaml aed O�E�Cou6y CalttihoY imathe or a aw wivldefafaolmy Olseiala lmeur-h.W..b»�a(aeefr dadolm 6nanral a* ttlasData Na Qadedlae ottbpl211pbP bl��I'�Yo0 il�awr�wm 1laaaatble{, 90a. � 71MMt9ab�le¢atltb'pmvlNatirtftmabea barllaa M.miRl,7ncb aaltea qa.b. er�rm Poapfa or"slake a(Cmhfw&and than a a Affbet.In now wq,fty mono paoft dA ddgvM6btw4ft#cdW dani11 L7ab fn'ao DO=in", eMe= . mawft se Can*ofo. w ma Oda pe9deaf mD(hmm. pvrw J N 19 '137 13:27 AQW.02 cold 97 p1 NOS[adA AdlaSllld ild TZe6T d6, ST tall' R-97% 310 312 9507 05-23-97 09:07PM P003 #21 ecs-a IZa ooaa RAN 19 ' S 97 17:21 FR PILLSBURI MPDISON 'E TO 10 P.00 1n=Rmay qPN ap aPMM,mil rrlatmPV WMG FU M 4MW4W IRIANBWFP W rRL at6 rPYaC 1YaD spiry raj Ri W InYr 4Wemmm20 Yoa4001 Mwl m imf�Pm a°P�4ob ML o pmmawDPW'•W*$wpm*Vow oRgpdp wAimpIm m**ampwmaPvoN;91 10WWm31QWR am WT-mr owm 'mI P-wl tu!mPwpm 70vd3=4 ro=ym YNopow onrdAo mpuzd& lmlarlmmOutswPApapwptm saa aRTX s PpwH WKS Pw wwarmfPttp10*?Q+amad It 7loprq" wvp mjoaAwmamina419KPwonF"v4=00 4-+0 4pmawm q 10Ava caR"mvv lei aoamesa�6foSaYnPa�SP�q'�n A+tm�4W�P+awlw KVkR=pa'P�mKW1a!wpm=Rq '/Pep Mod 719 LRP"AAM,44amwPa4w Pam&MO'Jdpmu0X9L4Pam rb im<[melpw"Qwm;a twr"v k-oo alwm immd 't -wgarJ WAX1:aswt WOD-ppanq-Ffty e1 A LN kacw GRIU( rm nID um"I mm Ia"m m VI pmMOar a" aaPma F9 twousmiP 9AP-4-°WS"a*Pam Amm me a Awd pKd 99243-I�9otauwm=L^RhwvWl.6a.03*SUR) lrYtI va swo wp6mum nT lL>maPV Pmt SPY la?J:fQ oN r`C�9n+93a mae W mfll?►[CS�PrI PDSSplPlf eo!fBYIDCS o4J. „ ,. .w.m. u n •�'�A6 L� B /F •:YT9TIb1Bi8T8 -W38 liDM MYBOL;I: FPBS:OTI 0-0-9^ End 69C'ON SE ACT W/tT/9t OT/40 mvd 'D'd NvKssv—) 6 'lltld L096-ZTE-OTE LO:TZ Lii T/6LA[1 "A OFTasw WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROF iov. CGRNM " 701 SOUTH PARKER STREET.SUITE 7000 K ORANGE,CA MW114M K(7I4)558-TOW K FAX ITN)855-TT87 DIRECT Oft(718)5 24 DIRECT FAX(714)S5.25U5 July 11, 1997 Mr. Steven E. Lewis, County Auditor- Controller County of Orange 12 Civic Center Plaza Post Office Box 567 Santa Ana, CA 92702-0567 Re: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Sanitary Sewer Service Charges Dear Mr. Lewis: On behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, we wish to acknowledge and thank you for your letter dated June 30, 1997, advising that you were withdrawing your previous request of April 30, 1997, that all public agencies seeking to have their assessments or service charges collected on the Tax Roll pursuant to authorized provisions of statutory law, execute a certificate of compliance and indemnification. We have reviewed the revised certificate which you have now requested to be executed, and regrettably, we still must advise that the appropriate officers of the Districts are unable to execute that certificate. While we certainly recognize the concern of you and perhaps the other auditors throughout the State of California concerning the possible legal challenges to adoption of fees, charges and assessments, we must indicate that we are unable to have the Chairman of the District or even the general management execute the proposed certificate because it is essentially requiring them to certify as to a matter of law. Those elected officials and appointed management are simply not trained or able to make that judgment which rightfully will only be able to be made by an appropriate court of proper jurisdiction. In all probability, that will be the California Supreme Court. As for a possibility of General Counsel executing the certificate, that is analogous to having General Counsel issue a bond counsel opinion, which I, as the Districts' General Counsel, am not prepared to issue. I am prepared to provide to you a statement that says that the Districts have followed the appropriate procedures of law for the enactment and h YC.ANORVS•NL YE5L11 YI•M.I s0001K-91 T C.BMIV •IOHN E GVANACOR•MIO O.FARRMOWN RODDL R.FlIX KIOSDMW.FORBATI•RWSI.PoRINSODOFA•WM E 11A •MMOAIFNA UI.W-wIAVT•TIOFIAB F.NNW IASONE RpNI(1[•IORNX SNAW•KE 1-N XnA T.M.•MNM I.SrtNfE•OANHIK.Sp UN-NA0.WAT RTKWA9 L MOOp W Mr. Steven E. Lewis, July 11, 1997 Page 2 adoption of its ordinances wherein their user charges have been adopted. But, anything in addition to that is simply beyond the legal parameters that I am able to provide. It is my recommendation that your office withhold any further requests for certificates until such time as there is a more definitive evaluation of the law by rulings of courts of appeal or the California Supreme Court, so that all parties will know exactly what the applicable rules will be. In the meantime, I am simply unable to advise my clients that they should execute the certificate which you have submitted. I will be more happy than to review this with you or with County Counsel if you have any thoughts, concerns or suggestions. Based on the above, I have advised my client to proceed on the assumption that your office will not require this certificate to be executed by the Districts and that the user charges that have been recently enacted by ordinance and will be submitted to your office in accordance with all of the other requirements of your April 30th letter, will be placed on the Tax Rolls for FY 97-98. If that is not the action that your office will take, I would ask that you notify me immediately so that we may consider other alternatives. Very truly yours, WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART HOMAS L. WOODRUFF rLw:� Enclosures cc: John Collins, Joint Chairman Boards of Directors ✓ Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Farad Bea UseOnN AGENDA ❑ CO .INFO,ITEM ITEM ❑ COMM.ACTIONREM ❑ Jr.BOS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ Jr.BDS.DISCUSSION NON-CONSENT) ❑ PUBLIC HEARING ?*F.T.BDS.MEETING DATE JT BOS.AGENDA REM NO, MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMITS: OMITS (Onginator) FOG: POD FAHR FAHR 2220/Ross H. Tipps 12558 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No..Name.and Extension JT.BDS: 0723/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: RATIFYING PAYMENTOF CLAIMS OF THE JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS BY ROLL CALL VOTE (each Director shall be called only once and that vole will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Recommended Action(s): 1. Staff recommends approval of payment of claims/warrant listing. CEGA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: YES NO NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC Date Notice of Exemption Filed: ITEM: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination fikd an_ CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGETBALANCE TOTAL EXPENDRURES Tmxeal TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ N/A N/A NIA N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION BUDGETTOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES NO NOT APPLICABLE If YES,state number: Permanent Limited Tom If YES.explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Rn 06,1497 Page 1 of 2 H:IW P.DTAtFI N12220\TI PPSNR.W PD 1 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Lisp: � Ontlip for CONC ENCES: sign re DatV Divisi e e De n ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(Dsp Sign)fture Date Deifartment Head r Designee) Slgneture Date Asststent General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager sewaasarasr Page 2 of 2 H:\WP.DTA(FIN=0mPPMIT.VJPD FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05107/97 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05 tW!17 POSTING DATE 05/14/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158819 A&G INDUSTRIES $1.805.22 STRAINER PROBES 168820 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $3.013.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158821 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $1.47 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158822 AWSI $30.00 D.O.T.TRAINING PROGRAM 158823 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $164.24 HARDWARE 158824 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES $420.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 158825 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. 5417,891.60 CONSTRUCTION J-34-1,P2-35-5 158826 AIRBORNE EXPRESS $139.25 AIR FREIGHT 158827 ALADDIN HOUSE $604.56 WINDOW BLINDS 158828 ALCO PRODUCTS INC $267.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158829 ALLOSEP $431.81 FILTERS 158830 ALPHA RESEARCH GROUP $14,430.00 ON-SITE TRAINING DEVELOPMENT 158831 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158832 AMERICAN DIGITALTECHNOLOGIES $1,200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158833 AMERICAN INST OF GRAPHIC ARTS $245.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 158834 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $257.33 PUBLICATION 158835 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $346.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158836 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $4.841.70 NOTICES&ADS 158837 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. ' $60.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 158838 ATWNIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158839 AWARDS&TROPHIES $172.69 PLAQUES 158840 BAR TECH TELECOM,INC. $200.00 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION 168841 BARNEBYSUTCLIFFE CORP. $136.99 FILTERS 158842 BARNES&NOBEL BOOKS $23.27 PUBLICATION 158843 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $7,500.21 BATTERIES 158B44 BLACK&VEATCH $3,221.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1 46 158845 BLACK BOX CORP $4,557.87 FIBER OPTIC CONVERTER 158048 BOOT BARN $96.87 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 158847 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $11.770.12 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.18 158848 ROBERT B.BRESKIN $2,232.50 PERMIT FEE REFUND 158849 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $51.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158850 CS COMPANY $712.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 15BB51 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $1,154.49 LAB SUPPLIES 158852 CALIFORNIA AUTO REFRIGERATION $367.20 REPAIR KITS 168853 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $1,469.01 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 158854 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $120.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158855 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $679.00 MOVING SERVICES 158856 CAMALI CORP. $1,200.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158857 CANUS CORPORATION $37,298.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 158858 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $49,486.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO&24-95 158859 SUSAN W.CASE $165.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158860 CATAPULTING. $2.720.00 ON-SITE TRAINING 158861 MARK CASTILLO $3,038.97 EXPENSE REIMS, 158862 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $17,328.79 INSPECTION SERVICES 166863 CLEAN SOURCE $651.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158M COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $8,328.70 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OSM7197 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05114/97 POSTING DATE05114A37 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158M COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2.007.38 PUMP PARTS 158866 COMPUTERS AMERICA $219.70 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 158667 COMPUSERVE $821.03 COMPUTER SERVICES 158868 CONDENSER B CHILLER SERVICE $1,275.00 SERVICE ANALYSIS 158869 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. $116.31 TRUCK PARTS 150870 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL 58.309.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 158871 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,057.15 ENGINE PARTS 158872 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $74.60 TRUCK PARTS 158873 COUNTY CLERK $228.00 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 158874 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $3.065.67 ELECTRIC PARTS 155875 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $785.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 158876 DELL MARKETING L.P. 548,595A2 COMPUTERS 15B8T7 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $380.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 158878 DIAMOND H RECOGNITION $270.15 SERVICE AWARDS 158879 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION 83,596.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 1588M DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $1.065.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 158881 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $105.16 PAINT SUPPLIES 158882 EMA SERVICES INC $3,100.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158853 ESP INDUSTRIES,INC. $130.85 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 158884 EATON CORP/CUTLER HAMMER $3,942.71 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 158885 ELECTAIR $350.11 PNEUMATIC CYLINDERS 1588H ENCHANTER,INC. S4"0.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.52495 ISM87 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,181.55 LAB SERVICES 158588 JIM EVANS $2.697.30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158889 FAIRBANKS SCALES INC $3,885.83 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158890 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $380.36 FRAMES 158891 FIBERTRON $198.63 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 158892 BAILEY FISCHER&PORTER CO. $267.39 FILTERS 156893 FLICKINGERCO 5239.66 VALVES 158894 FLORIDA CONVEYOR S EQUIP $11,714.71 POLY-ROLLER ASSY. 15BB95 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $256.02 PAINT SUPPLIES 158896 FRYS ELECTRONICS $89.47 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 158897 GCS SERVICE,INC. $137.13 TIMER 158898 GCOE 899.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 158899 GST,INC. $14.735.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158M GTE COMMUNICATONS(FLOOR 3) $164,342.54 PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADES 168901 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $1,115.21 LUMBERMARDWARE 158902 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $5,600.92 CHEMICALS 158903 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $952.50 REPAIR SCRUBBER TOWERS 158904 . GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.175.66 TELEPHONE SERVICES 158905 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $92.00 PUBLICATION 158906 GRASSY S.T.I. 9530.48 ENGINE PARTS 158907 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.,INC. $6.751.90 ELECTRICAL PARTS 158908 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $111.54 PRINTING 158909 DGA CONSULTANTS $950.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-94 158910 MACH COMPANY $3.319.04 LAB SUPPLIES e FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O5114/97 POSTING DATE O5/14197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158911 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $2,484.19 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158912 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $6,254.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 156913 PL HAWN CO,INC. $314.88 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158914 LINDA HOLMES $2,312.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158915 HOME DEPOT $63.46 SMALL HARDWARE 158916 HRDIRECT $123.34 LABOR LAW POSTERS 158917 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $67.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 158918 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,341.73 WATER USE 158919 IC ENGINE 8 EQUIP SERVICE $2,159.99 GENERATOR PARTS 168920 IPCO SAFETY $922.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 158921 ISCO,INC. $49.39 INSTRUMENT 158922 IMAGING PLUS $594.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158923 IMAGING AND RECORDS MGMNT $200.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 168924 INORGANIC VENTURES $139.00 LAB SUPPLIES 158925 IAML $1.675.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 168926 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $677.15 BATTERIES IM927 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $2.90 WATER USE ISB928 JAMISON ENGINEERING $22,642.65 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 158929 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $2,412.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158930 JAWS CATERING $440.69 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 158931 JENSEN TOOLS,INC. $226.28 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 158932 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $100.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 158933 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $301.46 ELECTRIC PARTS 158934 TERRI JOSWAY $250.00 TRAINING EXPENSES 158935 KEENAN SUPPLY $590.21 WELDING SUPPLIES 158936 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. 525ASC82 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 158937 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $441.21 MACHINE SUPPLIES 158938 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $897.75 TOOLS 158939 VLADIMIR KOGAN $342.58 EXPENSE REIMB. 158940 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,618.73 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 158941 LAOUG ILA ORACLE USER GROUP) $495.00 MEMBERSHIP 158942 MDT $936.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158943 MACOMCO $455.55 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158944 MANDIC MOTORS $44.00 TOWING SERVICES 158945 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $1,406,500.00 CONSTRUCTION P7-36-2 158946 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. 5490,980.23 CONSTRUCTION P141,P143 158947 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $88,018.00 CONSTRUCTION PIA(42(RESID),P2-47-2(REBID) 158948 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $82.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158949 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $201.88 FERRIC CHLORIDE SUPPLIES 158950 MCINFO $10,460.67 COMPUTER HARDWARE 158951 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $120.88 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 158952 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $173.08 HEATER 158963 MELLON TRUST $15.227.10 INVESTMENT CUSTODIAN BANK 158954 MESA MUFFLER $137.75 TRUCK PARTS 158955 MICRON SPEARATION INC $58.34 LAB SUPPLIES 158956 MIDWAY MFG.a MACHINING $2,732.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 05/07/97 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 POSTING DATE O5114197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158957 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.744.44 UNIFORM RENTALS 158958 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $3,020.00 CONST INSP TRAILER LEASE 158959 MORTON SALT AND/OR $1.405.47 SALT 158960 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $442.15 PUMP PARTS 158951 NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S $69.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158962 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP $451.28 TRAINING VIDEO'S 158963 NETWORK CATALYST,INC $9.417.27 COMPUTER HARDWARE 158964 NICKEY PETROLEUM CO.,INC. $3.637.64 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 155965 SY NIELSON SERVICE INC $50.00 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION 158966 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $103.00 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 158967 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,954.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158968 OMNI WESTERN INC 5410.85 TOOLS 158969 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $185.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 155970 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2.063.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158971 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,007.56 FITTINGS 158972 OXYGEN SERVICE $3.980.20 SPECIALTY GASES 158973 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2,695.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 158974 COUNTY OF ORANGE $280.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 158975 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $431.02 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155976 PACIFIC PARTS&CONTROLS,INC. $2,664.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS 158977 PACIFIC BELL $18.05 TELEPHONE SERVICES 158978 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY 52,417.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158979 PASCAL&LUDWIG ENGINEERS $21,794.00 CONSTRUCTION JJ3.2 158980 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. $63.617.20 CONSTRUCTION PI-382 158981 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY 55D0.81 REIMB.PETTY CASH 158982 PIMA GRID SYSTEMS,INC. $83,986.48 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 158953 US FILTER I POLYMETMCS INC $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 158984 POLYPURE.INC. $26,771.02 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 158985 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 598.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 158986 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $158.95 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158987 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $88.03 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 158988 HIPOTRONICS,INC. $59.59 FREIGHT CHARGE 158989 RUN GROUP,INC. $2,249.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158990 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $3.533.93 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 158991 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $329.34 TRASH REMOVAL 158992 RAND MATERIALS HANDLING $142.80 FREIGHT CHARGE 158993 RD SYSTEMS INC $222.03 CAMERA REPAIR 158994 REALTIME $3.044.40 INTEGRATION&SUPPORT SERVICES 158995 REDWINGSHOES $151.71 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 1589% REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $334.03 VALVE 158997 REMEDY TEMP $10.297.82 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 166998 REVCOILINDBERG $233.57 DISPLAY PANEL 155999 GEORGE ROBERTSON $834.94 EXPENSE REIMB. 159000 MARCY ROTHENBERG $1,695.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159001 RUTAN&TUCKER $10,296.00 LEGAL SERVICES 159002 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1.449.03 SPECIALTY GASES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 05/07/97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O5/14197 POSTING DATE 05114197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159003 SEWER EQUIP CO OF FLORIDA $7.141.51 HOSE 159004 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,705.58 TOOLS 159005 SHURELUCK SALES $608.62 TOOLSMARDWARE 159006 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1.337.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94 159D07 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $30.00 PERMIT FEES 159008 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $880.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 159009 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $103.63 WATER USE 159010 SUCCESSORIES $520.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 159011 SUNSET FORD $189.11 TRUCK PARTS 159012 SUPELCO,INC. $1.032.89 LAB SUPPLIES 159013 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $15.250,00 CONSTRUCTION 159014 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $432ADC15 CONSTRUCTION P2-35-3,PI-38-5,P246,P2-65 159015 SYMCAS,INC. $142.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 159016 TEKTRONIX,INC. $247.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159017 THERMO SEPERATION PRODUCTS $446.66 LAB SUPPLIES 159018 THERMO JARRELL ASH CORP $503.39 TRAINING PACKAGE 159019 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $10.986.32 MECHANICAL PARTS 159020 TOWS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE , $330.59 LOCKS&KEYS 169021 EDWARD M.TORRES $300.55 EXPENSE REIMB. 159D22 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL $3,139.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159023 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $722.90 TRUCK PARTS 159024 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $698.64 TRUCK PARTS 159025 TRUESDAIL LASS $1,811.00 LAB SERVICES 169026 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $1,503.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159027 MICHELLE TUCHMAN $110.52 EXPENSE REIMB. 159028 TULE RANCHIMAGAN FARMS $38.620.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL 159029 DANIEL TUNNICLIFF $250.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159030 TUSTIN DODGE $46.32 TRUCK PARTS 159031 UNISOURCEIVOR BUTLER PAPER $656.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159032 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $110.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 159033 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7.208.50 LAB SUPPLIES 159034 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1.873.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159035 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $79.48 VALVE 159036 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC. $1,993.37 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 159037 VERNE'S PLUMBING $632.30 PLUMBING SERVICES 159038 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $1,672.77 FIBER OPTICS 159039 WACKENHUT CORP. $6,138.66 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 159040 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $22LI.00 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 159041 WAXIE $135.13 JANITORIAL SUPPUES 159042 WEF $500.D0 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 15SD43 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $22,768.99 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23.95 1590" WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $57.36 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159045 WESTSIDE BLDG MATERIAL CORP $340.15 TOOLS 159046 XEROX CORP. $10.146.73 COPIER LEASES 159047 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $455.95 LAB SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 05/14/97 $3.839.204.01 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/07/97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05114/97 POSTING DATE 0511497 SUMMARY AMOUNT 91 OPER FUN4 $225.00 92 OPER FUND $422.50 92 CAP FAC FUND 53,350.00 03 OPER FUND 570,187.42 93 CAP FAC FUND $950.00 95 OPER FUND 527.15 07 OPER FUND $800.95 911 OPER FUND $2.382.63 911 CAP FAC FUND $2.836.99 JT OPER FUND $394,580.99 CORF $3.280,351.21 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $138,089.17 $3,839,204.01 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O&WA7 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 052SA7 POSTING DATE 05/28N7 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159070 AGX CORPORATION $424.05 GAUGE 1SM71 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $722.52 HARDWARE 15SD72 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $3,235.60 LAB SUPPLIES 159073 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $99.36 AIR CONDITIONER REPAIRS 159074 ALLIED PACKING&RUBBER INC $652.50 GASKETS 159075 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION $85.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 159076 AMERICAN CRANE INSTITUTE $825.00 CRANE&MANLIFT TRAINING 159077 AMERICAN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES $6.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 169078 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $1.245.00 PUBLICATION 159079 AMER SOC FOR QUALITY CONTROL $351.50 PUBLICATIONS 159080 AMETEK $78.33 CIRCUIT BOARD REPAIR 159081 LLOYD ANDERSON $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159082 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES $1,233.39 MACHINE SUPPLIES 159083 ARMOR-VAC $1.146.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 159084 ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS S24,413.12 SOFTWARE UPGRADES 169085 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH,INC. $260.70 FILTER 159066 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159087 CYMANTHA ATKINSON $1&00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159088 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO $214.42 AUTO SHOP SUPPLIES 159089 AVIS CONTRACTOR LICENSE SVC CE $2,065.00 EXAM PREPARATION 159090 SAYSHORE PSYCHOLOGY CENTER $125.00 SEMINAR FEE 159091 BECWAR ENGINEERING $570.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159092 BELL PIPE&SUPPLY CO SS02.22 VALVE PARTS 159D93 BLACK BOX CORP $157.59 MODEM REPAIR 159094 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $5.259.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.7-1 &P2.48 159W5 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $330.32 GENERATORS 159096 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $244.84 INSTRUMENT I 159097 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.424.00 1 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.641-94 159098 CPI-THE ALTERNATIVE $755.32 LAB SUPPLIES 159D99 CS COMPANY $1,516.35 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 169100 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $203.65 LAB SUPPLIES 159101 CALTROL,INC. $3.109.62 HARDWARE 159102 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $435.54 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159103 CALOLYMPIC GLOVE&SAFETY 93.119.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159104 CAMALI CORP. $1,3W.CD SERVICE AGREEMENT 159105 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEE INC $15.938.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 159105 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. S4,403.12 OFFICE FURNITURE 159107 CENTURY PAINT $121.93 PAINT SUPPLIES 159108 CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY $50,00 PUBLICATION 159109 CLEAN SOURCE $4W.93 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159110 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $300.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 169111 COLE SCIENTIFIC,INC. $20,10 LAB SERVICES 159112 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $293.84 LAB SUPPLIES 159113 COLOR ARTS INC $1,749.75 VEHICLE DECALS 159114 COMMUNITY ACTION\EAP $950.00 DISTRICT EAP-MAY 97 169115 COMPUTERS AMERICA $1,741.94 COMPUTER SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0522/97 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0528/97 POSTING DATE 0528197 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159116 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $485.52 ELECTRIC PARTS 159117 CONSUMER PIPE $4,397.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159118 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $7,702.97 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11-93 159119 DOUG COOK $140.30 EXPENSE REIMB. 159120 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $307.24 ENGINE PARTS 159121 CORPORATE EXPRESS $175.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159122 CUMMINS-ALLISON CORP $981.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 159123 CA DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES $3.119.00 MEMBERSHIP 159124 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $20.126.00 1ST QUARTER UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 159125 DCC/CAL INC $137.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159126 CHRISTOPHER DAHL $817.37 EXPENSE REIMB. 159127 DATA CLEAN CORP $2,910.00 EARTHQUAKE PROOFING 159128 JIM DAVIDSON $392.34 EXPENSE REIMB. /59129 TOM DAWES $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159130 DAYS INN HOTEL $545.80 HOTEL RESERVATIONS 159131 DELL MARKETING L.P. $13,210.15 COMPUTERS 159132 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $34,449.24 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-1294 159133 DELTA INTERNET SERVICES,INC. $100.00 DOMAIN SET-UP FEE 159134 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,583.99 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 159135 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $515.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159138 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION $3,480.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 159137 ROBERT DUMITY $713.76 EXPENSE REIMB. 159136 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,001.25 PAINT SUPPLIES 159139 ESP INDUSTRIES,INC. $456.06 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159140 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $150.65 TRUCK PARTS 169141 J.D.EDWARDS $29,177.30 SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7.24-96 159142 EL-COM HARDWARE $81.62 FAN 159143 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $1.621.64 REPAIR 159144 KENNETH J EMANUELS&ASSOC $16,500.00 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATE SERVICES 159145 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $900.0D CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 159146 ENCHANTER.INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 159147 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,030.35 LAB SERVICES 159148 JIM EVANS $4,519.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159149 EXCALIBUR ENTERPRISES $95.97 VIDEO CAMERA ADAPTER 159160 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $486.33 AIR FREIGHT 159151 FIBERTRON $2,75423 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 159152 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $733.30 FILTERS 159153 FIRST CHOICE $1.236.56 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 159154 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $4,729A3 LAB SUPPLIES 159155 FLO-SYSTEMS $631.10 PUMP PARTS 159156 FORD TRUCK PARTS $431.00 TRUCK PARTS 159157 FORMA SCIENTIFIC,INC. $10,1D8.81 LAB EQUIPMENT 159158 FORKERT ENGINEERING&SURVEY $670.83 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 69-94 159159 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $146.91 PHOTO SUPPLIES 159160 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,8DB.83 PAINT SUPPLIES 159161 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $338.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES .o FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0522/97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0528M7 POSTING DATE 05128/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159162 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $144.28 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES 159163 GKK CORPORATION $498.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159164 DST,INC. $7.941.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159165 CITY OF GARDEN GROVE $110.00 PERMIT FEE 159186 GARTNER GROUP,INC. $1.195.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS 159167 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $166.34 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 159168 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5.544.58 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159169 N.GLANTZ&SON INC. $207.72 TOOLS 159170 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $88.00 PUBLICATIONS 159171 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $930.70 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 159172 GRASSY S.T.I. $505.24 ENGINE PARTS 159173 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $2,680.65 PRINTING 159174 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,692.91 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-844 159175 HACH COMPANY $51.92 LAB SUPPLIES 159176 HAESTAD METHODS $295.00 SOFTWARE 159177 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.868.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159176 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW $85.00 SUBSCRIPTION 159179 PL HAWN CO,INC. $16.97 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 159180 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $4.151.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 159181 HIGHLANDER LAUNDROMAT $179.19 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159182 HILTI,INC. $530A3 TOOLS 169183 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $187.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS 159184 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $335.75 LAB SUPPLIES 159185 HUNSAKER B ASSOC IRVINE.INC. $600.59 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159186 JOHN HUNT $5,420.00 CONSTRUCTION P1 44-3 159187 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $780.00 WATER USE 159188 IPCO SAFETY $27.159.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159189 IMAGING PLUS $227.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159190 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFGS $2,462.82 FILTERS 159191 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $207.05 CONNECTORS 159192 INORGANIC VENTURES $244.81 LAB SUPPLIES 159193 INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED MON T $1.575.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 169194 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $926.06 BATTERIES 159195 INTERSTATE ENGINEERING $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159196 ISCO,INC. $792.61 INSTRUMENT 159197 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $310.32 PRINTING 159198 JAMISON ENGINEERING $5,910.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 159199 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1,286.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159200 JAYS CATERING $735.22 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 159201 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $172.64 GAUGE 159202 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,732.05 ELECTRIC PARTS 159203 KAISER PERMANENTE $43.223.37 INSURANCE PREMIUM 159204 DIONNE KARDOS $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159205 KELAR CORPORATION $2,880.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 159206 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $86.174.01 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95 159207 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4.285.33 TOOLS FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0522/97 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0528/97 POSTING DATE 05rM97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159205 DUSTIN LE $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159209 DAVIDA LUDWIN $163.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159210 MPS $686.11 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 159211 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159212 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOC $70.00 MEMBERSHIP 159213 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $1,507.69 WELDING SUPPLIES 169214 MANTEK $321.99 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 159215 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $662.83 VALVE PARTS 159216 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $22.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159217 MIKE MCCARTHY $399.52 EXPENSE REIMB. 159218 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $69.32 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 159219 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $1,794.21 TOOLS 159220 CHARLES MCRANEY $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159221 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $2,940.94 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159222 METRA HEALTH $114,457.98 INSURANCE PREMIUMS 159223 MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP $5,668.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 159224 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $11.431.51 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 159225 PORTIA MINA $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159228 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $344.80 OFFICE TRAILER LEASE 159227 MONTGOMERY WATSON $6.500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NO 2-26.97 159228 MICHAEL D.MOORE $1,181.50 EXPENSE REIMB. 169229 MOTEL SIX 034 $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159230 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC $1,137.68 ELECTRICAL PARTS 159231 MOTOROLA.INC. $893.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159232 SAM MOWBRAY $188.47 EXPENSE REIMB. 159233 NADINE'S LAUNDRY $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159234 NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHOPS $139.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 159235 NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS $5,233.10 ELECTRICAL PARTS 159236 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $758A4 EXTERIOR METAL LETTERS 159237 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $9.217.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159238 NETWORK CATALYST,INC $62,916.30 COMPUTER HARDWARE 159239 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $98.20 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 159240 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE $26,656.68 SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 159241 NWLAND/OR $12,986.21 LIFE INSURANCE 159242 OI CORPORATION $181.02 LAB SUPPLIES 159243 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $386.93 SAFETY GLASSES 159244 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $3.047.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159245 OMEGA CORPORATION $153,145.35 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 159246 OMNI WESTERN INC $236.62 TOOLS 169247 ORACLE CORPORATION $1,600.00 SOFTWARE 159248 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $187.66 PUMP PARTS 159249 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $4,074.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 159250 COUNTYOFORANGE $23.473.58 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 159251 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $41,942.97 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 159252 COUNTYOFORANGE $66.00 PERMIT FEE 159253 PSI $646.50 HARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05122/97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05128W POSTING DATE 05128/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159254 PACIFIC INVESTMENT MGMT CO $122.470.00 INVESTMENT MGMT.SERVICE RES 95-75 159255 PACIFIC PARTS&CONTROLS,INC. $602.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159256 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $1,379.20 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 159257 PACIFIC BELL $1.275.50 TELEPHONE SERVICES 159258 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $1,611.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159259 PAGENET $589.43 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 159260 PAINE WEBBER $50,848.M COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 159261 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $447.31 AIR REGULATOR 159262 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159263 PARTS UNLIMITED $831A5 TRUCK PARTS 159264 PERMASEAL $5,087.94 LURE OIL 159265 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $2,099.66 REIMB.PETTY CASH 159265 JERRI PI $46.65 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159267 POWER SYSTEMS TESTING CO. $1,025.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 159268 MIKE PRLICH&SONS $518.068.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-35R-1 159269 R M CONTROLS $50.72 PLOTTER PENS 159270 R&R INSTRUMENTS $549.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 159271 REALTIME $255.00 INTEGRATION&SUPPORT SERVICES 159272 THE REGISTER $200.00 NOTICES&ADS 159273 LAWRENCE ROOD $79.25 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159274 SAVANT $2.017.60 LAB SUPPLIES 159275 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. 522,164.30 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 159276 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1.215.42 LAB SUPPLIES 159277 SEARS $486.79 TOOLS 159278 SEARS ROEBUCK&CO $1.016.69 REFRIGERATOR 159279 SECOND-SUN $281.39 OFFICE FURNITURE 159280 SERPENTIX CORPORATION $5,558.58 NYLON ROLLER ASSEMBLY 159281 STUARTSEVERN $893.66 EXPENSE REIMB. 159282 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,603.56 TOOLS 169283 SHURELUCK SALES $2.267.81 TOOLSIHARDWARE 159284 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTS INC. $130.00 PROBE 159285 SMITH-EMERY CO. $5.402.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94 159286 SNAP ON I SUN CORP $608.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159287 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1,315.84 TOOLS 159288 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO $46,030.36 POWER 159289 SO CALIF EDISON CO $30,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 11-15-95 169290 SO.CAL.OAS.CO. $20,328.71 NATURAL GAS 159291 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,084,94 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 159292 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $250,00 METER 159293 SPRINT $32.70 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 159294 SRECO FLEXIBLE $175.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 159295 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $539.67 LAB SUPPLIES 159296 STRATEGIC FRAMEWORKS,INC. $12,180.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 159297 SUNSETFORD $771A8 TRUCK PARTS 159298 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $143.55 HOSE 159299 SUPERB ONE41OUR PHOTO $24.43 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0522/97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0526197 POSTING DATE 0528197 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 159300 SYMCAS.INC. $878.75 CONSULTING SERVICES 159301 TJ SAUSAGE KITCHEN INC $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159302 TEL-A-TRAIN INC. $6,529.50 TRAINING VIDEO TAPES 159303 TELEDYNE $1.248.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159304 TEST EQUITY,INC. $1,947.72 POWER SUPPLY 159305 THOMAS BROS MAPS $210.00 PRINTING 159306 TERRYTHROOP $9.00 DEDUCTION REIMB. 159307 TORNELL&GOTTEN $2,219.00 LEGAL FEES 159308 TOXGAURD SYSTEMS.INC. $1,995.00 REPAIR STORAGE TANK MONITORS 159309 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $17341 TRUCK PARTS 159310 TRUESDAIL LABS $992,00 LAB SERVICES 159311 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $2,679.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS 159312 UNIRULE INDUSTRIES $28,94 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159313 UNISOURCEIVOR BUTLER PAPER $93,16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159314 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $331.07 PARCEL SERVICES 159315 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $94.00 OFFSITE BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 159316 UNOCAL CORPORATION $670.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159317 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $213.00 LAB SUPPLIES 159318 U S POSTAL SERVICE $5.000.00 POSTAGE 159319 VWR SCIENTIFIC $865.68 LAB SUPPLIES 159320 TONY VALENZUELA $150.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159321 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $667.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 159322 VERNITS PLUMBING $880.22 PLUMBING SERVICES 159323 VERTEX TECHNOLOGIES,INC. $144.84 FIBER OPTICS 159324 VISION SERVICE PLAN-(CA) $7,544.00 VISION INSURANCE PREMIUM 159325 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $392.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 159328 WACKENHUT CORP. $0,130.56 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 159327 WATERS CORPORATION $5.416.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT 159328 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY $1,905.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 159329 WEKA PUBLISHING,INC. $145.50 PUBLICATION 159330 WELLS SUPPLY CO. $1,171.02 VALVES 159331 WEMAC DIV OF PURITAN-BENNETT $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 159332 WESTERN BUSINESS SYSTEMS $938.29 PAYROLL CHECK STOCK 159333 WESTERN METRO UNIT $1.312.90 FILTERS 159334 NANCY WHEATLEY $1.207.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 159335 JUDITHA.WILSON $70.89 CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES REIMB. 159335 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN&SMART $116,330.24 LEGAL SERVICES M07-2&95 159337 XEROX CORP. $9,527.70 COPIER LEASES 159338 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $567.88 LAB SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0528/97 $2,043,472.63 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0522/97 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/2SM7 POSTING DATE 05/28M7 SUMMARY AMOUNT M1 OPER FUND $2,057.52 91 CONST FUND $8.018.96 $2 OPER FUND $13,957.70 $2 CAP FAC FUND $600.59 $2 CONST FUND $20.469.15 $3 OPER FUND $9,021.35 $3 CAP FAC FUND $519.669.47 $3 CONST FUND $18.632.05 $5 OPER FUND $1,379.31 45 CAP FAC FUND $7.702.97 $5 CONST FUND $4,300.00 $6 OPER FUND $1,272.33 $S CONST FUND $2.183.38 $7 OPER FUND $3,866.43 $7 CAP FAC FUND $2,639.18 07 CONST FUND $4,026.93 #11 OPER FUND $2,613.21 •11 CAP FAC FUND $1.158.70 011 CONST FUND $2,706.33 $13 OPER FUND $347.41 $13 CAP FAC FUND $74.63 #14 CONST FUND $438A3 $586 CAP FAC FUND $498.40 $687 OPER FUND $216.49 $7814 OPER FUND $17.18 JT OPER FUND $386,016.11 CORP $355.312.70 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $93.582.37 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $580,675.28 $2,043.472.53 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION O6112197 159659 FORTIS BENEFITS INS.CO. $17.410.87 SHORT TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE O6119M 159676 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO $5.318.89 POWER O6119/97 159677 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO $47,020.74 POWER 0624197 159945 BANK OF AMERICA $138.75 BANKING SERVICES 06125MI 159946 BANK OF AMERICA $138.75 BANKING SERVICES D625/97 159947 NETWORK CATALYST,INC E58,364.94 SOFTWARE TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $128.392.94 SUMMARY AMOUNT #11 OPER FUND $1,670.20 JT OPER FUND $50,669.43 CORF $58.364.94 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $17.688.37 $128,392.94 On For M,sec.Use N AGENDA ❑ COMM,INFO,REM � ❑ COMM.ACTION ITEM ITEM ❑ Jr.aDS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ NONe C.DISCUSSION N n m (NONCONSENT) ❑qUSLICHEARING JT.SOS.MEETING DATE JT.SOS.AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.to.NO, DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMITS: OMITS (Originator) PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR 2 3720,Joe Rycraw, Extension 5057 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:7/SM7 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wording: CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE PETITION RECEIVED FROM PHILLIP AND BARBARA JOUJON-ROCHE TO ANNEX .608 ACRES OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICTS IN THE VICINITY OF SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD AND MOHLER DRIVE IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF ANNEXATION OF SAID TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, (PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 78 JOUJON-ROCHE ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2). This property is currently inhabited with one single family residence. This proposed annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding AB8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties under which the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and, instead collects a higher annexation fee. The local sewering agency is the City of Anaheim. The total annexation fee $5,746.00. Recommended Action(s): 1.Staff recommends approval of the attached motion initiating proceedings for Annexation No. 78-Joujon-Roche annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negalive Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Deterrninaticn filed on_ NO past Board action CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES Rot.I Bud,.r pun w.d.nl TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ N/A N/A N/A N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Schedule/Line Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Une Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISEDTOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year In Budget: -0- -0- -0- $(100 Master Plen Estimate: Year of First Costs: nw; �Wlas, Page 1 of 2 H'%WP.DTAWGENDAW ITS-97VULYIENG.01 IS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED Ar AMOUNT -0- -D- -0- $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO II VES,date number _Permarred _U.ft d Tonn If YES,e,*In In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Lisa: �d�L/ 7 3— 97 1. N/A Originator Date CON URRENCE . S' n Date Melon a ( ) 2 /:31 ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) g r Dat` D (Or I ee I / S� S gn ure Det Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background) Letter to City of Anaheim (May 14 1997) The Joujon-Roches are Constructing an addition to their single family home. They have submitted an application and paid all fees for annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. Processing time for annexations normally is about four months after the matter has been submitted to the Board of Directors for consideration. In order not to inconvenience or delay the applicant's construction plans, a letter was sent to the City of Anaheim on May 14, 1997 informing the City that it was within the District's policy to proceed with connection of sewers prior to formal annexation completion, as long as all the fees were paid and applications(s) property initiated. RJR:jmf H:IW P.DTAAGENDAAITS-97UULYIENG.01 c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager R°"ee°Ml" Page 2 of 2 H:1W P.DTAAGENDAAITS-M ULYIENG.01 Minutes of the Steering Committee Pana 1 Y County Sanitation Districts - of Orange County,California P. O. Box 8127/10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, June 25, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, June 25, 1997, at the Districts, Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PRESENT: John J. Collins, Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair George Brown, Chair, FAHR Burnie Dunlap, Chair, PDC Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS _ William Steiner, Supervisor - ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel STAFF PRESENT: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Chief Operations Officer Judith A. Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer Corina Chaudhry, Secretary Pro Tem Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 A June 25, 1997 �'Ile a cooperative project. The cooperative project would involve the Districts in helping to fund the City of Huntington Beach s deficient sewer system. Their long-term capital needs are estimated to cost $140 million. The more immediate costs are estimated to be at $7 million. Don mentioned that he sees the possibility of these type of requests happening more frequently in the future. Blake said that he had talked to Les Jones, Huntington Beach Public Works Director, and the four issues of concern were the Operations & Maintenance costs, capital improvements, revenue streams, and the reserve policies. Don asked if we could legally enter into this type of agreement with a particular city. Tom Woodruff replied that we could not; however, we could enter into some type of maintenance agreements. Regional Collection Systems Districts-wide Policies. Nancy Wheatley reported on EPA,s position regarding maintenance of regional sewer lines. She stated that because regional agencies are responsible for wastewater treatment for the communities that discharge to the regional system, EPA and the states were looking to the regional agencies for leadership in managing these local systems. She mentioned that while it is uncertain just how and when EPA might impose this type of requirement on regional agencies, she also stated that is was clear that EPA and the state regulatory agencies favor this regulatory approach. She suggested that the Board begin focusing on this issue in order to be prepared. Nancy stated that we needed to begin focusing on this issue to get ahead of the regulators. Nancy said that it was important to_get Board buy-in and then involve Public Works Directors to work with our staff in a joint effort. Nancy said that this issue would be going to the OMTS Committee on Tuesday. Update on SAWPA Agreement Don reported that he had met with Neil Cline this afternoon and that Neil reported that SAWPA would be receiving a check for$11 million from the Bureau; therefore the Districts would then receive a check for$4 million. Don said that this, however, did not cover the interest, and that this issue would be addressed at a later time. Proposition 218 Judy mentioned that she had received a letter from Thomas Logan who was concerned about Prop 218 and its impact on the newly adopted user fees. Judy said that a letter was being sent out to Mr. Logan addressing his concerns. Judy mentioned that she had also been in contact with Mr. Jonathan Copple who was concerned about the $390 million in reserves, and wanted to know if these reserves were for a specific purpose. Mr. Logan wanted to attend the June 25 Board meeting, but Judy suggested that he attend the September FAHR Committee as this would be addressed then. CLOSED SESSION There was no need for a Closed Session. County Sanitation Districts "Y/ of Orange County,California P. O. Box 8127/10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 9272"127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, June 25, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, June 25, 1997, at the Districts, Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PRESENT: John J. Collins, Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair George Brown, Chair, FAHR Burnie Dunlap, Chair, PDC Pat McGuigan, Chair, OMTS _ William Steiner, Supervisor - ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel STAFF PRESENT: Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager - Blake P. Anderson, Chief Operations Officer Judith A. Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer Corina Chaudhry, Secretary Pro Tem , Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 June 25, 1997 y" APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION: Approve draft minutes of the May 28, 1997 Steering Committee meeting. Motion unanimously carried. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR There was no report by the Committee Chair. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Don mentioned that he would be going on vacation to Illinois on July 21. Don said that part of the trip would be vacation and part business as he would also be visiting two sanitation districts; one in Cleveland and one in Louisville. Don mentioned that Mike Peterman would be making a presentation on the drug investigation at the CASA Conference in San Diego in August. Don said that he would like to add three items for discussion; Accident on Bushard regarding the manhole covers, OCIP, and Streamlining of the OCR Project Process. Don discussed the procedure of the OCR project and how inadequate the system seemed to be. Don said that the way the system is set up for approvals is very inefficient and will eventually slow down the process. He said that this needed to be addressed for discussion at the next OCR meeting. Peer Swan suggested that John Collins go to the next meeting and address this issue directly. It was mentioned that we should go back to OCR and let them know that staff is working on procedures for the OCR project. Action Item: An AIT, which details a procedure for the OCR project, should be developed and included as an item for the August PDC Committee. Blake provided photographs on the accident and stated that there were a total of four cars involved. Blake reported that we are presently investigating the accident to see if the cause could have been a pressure wave. All parties involved in the accident have been authorized the use of rental cars until their cars are fixed. Blake reported on the OCIP regarding the letter from Merrill Lynch agreeing to pay $3 million dollars for reimbursement of attorney's fees and $27 million towards the General Fund Account. Blake said that he had sent a letter to Pat Shea asking what the likelihood was of the Districts getting a part of that money, and if the Districts was entitled to a portion, when could they expect payment. Blake also wanted to ensure that this would not impact the civil case. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Tom reported that the lawyer for Sangermano had filed a motion for attorneys fees from the Districts. Tom didn't think there was any basis for this motion. Minutes of the Steering Committee v. Page V June 26, 1997 Tom reported the status on the investigation hearings thus far. The dollars spent so far on the investigation is about $463 thousand, with $1 million dollars saved from payroll. Tom will update the Steering Committee monthly of costs incurred from the investigation. Tom reported on the Anderson case and briefly discussed the Voluntary Settlement Conference. He mentioned that there had been some movement from this meeting. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-6) Delegation of Authority Don asked the Steering Committee on how to proceed regarding the Delegation of Authority. The Committee said to wait for a couple of months, bring the AT to the PDC Committee and then proceed to the full board in September. Discussion of Hiring a Consultant for PDC for Member Orientation Don reported that after the last PDC meeting, it was suggested that a workshop be scheduled to provide the PDC members with procedural information on Engineering projects. The idea of hiring a consultant to coordinate this workshop and meet with PDC members one-on-one was also suggested. Blake had suggested that we use a consultant by the name of Frank Dryden (previously worked for L.A. County Sanitation Districts for many years), to help coordinate the workshop and meet with PDC members. Don reported that a meeting took place on June 20, with John Collins, himself, Blake Anderson, Doug Stuart, and Frank Dryden to discuss some of the possibilities. Bumie Dunlap couldn•t attend the meeting. The Steering Committee suggested that Bumie Dunlap be the lead in this project and that at the July PDC meeting, Bumie should inform the PDC Committee of the proposal to schedule a workshop and that a consultant would be meeting with PDC members individually. Action Item: Bumie to discuss this proposal at the July PDC Committee. Peer suggested that there be a brief history-type orientation on how the Districts previously conducted business. He said that this would provide new members with a tool to make a comparison on current procedures. The Steering Committee suggested that this orientation take place at the August PDC Committee. John suggested that there be some understandable process flow charts for this orientation. Don mentioned that Frank Dryden,s fees.are $125 an hour, and this project could take approximately 45 hours to complete. Meeting with Huntington Beach Don said that there had been two meetings with the City of Huntington Beach. At the first meeting where he made a presentation, Don said that he could have upset one of the city members by not handing out his presentation notes beforehand. Don reported that he had sent a letter of apology and had received a reply. Al the second meeting, the City of Huntington Beach had requested the Districts to participate in Minutes of the Steering Committee Page4 June 25, 1997 �, a cooperative project. The cooperative project would involve the Districts in helping to fund the City of Huntington Beach,s deficient sewer system. Their long-term capital needs are estimated to cost $140 million. The more immediate costs are estimated to be at$7 million. Don mentioned that he sees the possibility of these type of requests happening more frequently in the future. Blake said that he had talked to Les Jones, Huntington Beach Public Works Director, and the four issues of concern were the Operations & Maintenance costs, capital improvements, revenue streams, and the reserve policies. Don asked if we could legally enter into this type of agreement with a particular city. Tom Woodruff replied that we could not; however, we could enter into some type of maintenance agreements. Regional Collection Systems Districts-wide Policies. Nancy Wheatley reported on EPA,s position regarding maintenance of regional sewer lines. She stated that because regional agencies are responsible for wastewater treatment for the communities that discharge to the regional system, EPA and the states were looking to the regional agencies for leadership in managing these local systems. She mentioned that while h is uncertain just how and when EPA might impose this type of requirement on regional agencies, she also stated that is was clear that EPA and the state regulatory agencies favor this regulatory approach. She suggested that the Board begin focusing on this issue in order to be prepared. Nancy stated that we needed to begin focusing on this issue to get ahead of the regulators. Nancy said that it was important to.get Board buy-in and then involve Public Works Directors to work with our staff in a joint effort. Nancy said that this issue would be going to the OMTS Committee on Tuesday. Update on SAWPA Agreement Don reported that he had met with Neil Cline this afternoon and that Neil reported that SAWPA would be receiving a check for$11 million from the Bureau; therefore the Districts would then receive a check for$4 million. Don said that this, however, did not cover the interest, and that this issue would be addressed at a later time. Proposition 218 Judy mentioned that she had received a letter from Thomas Logan who was concerned about Prop 218 and its impact on the newly adopted user fees. Judy said that a letter was being sent out to Mr. Logan addressing his concerns. Judy mentioned that she had also been in contact with Mr. Jonathan Copple who was concerned about the $390 million in reserves, and wanted to know if these reserves were for a specific purpose. Mr. Logan wanted to attend the June 25 Board meeting, but Judy suggested that he attend the September FAHR Committee as this would be addressed then. CLOSED SESSION There was no need for a Closed Session. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 y June 25, 1997 _ OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for July 30, 1997 at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m. Submitted by: (l L,,,,4� --x^s'- '� Corina Chaudhry, Secretary Pr m N�gc,p9nc1GM nERING COMMmER9hw,Y mmLe�.bx Fo,Ed.S-.°°e Om" AGENDA ❑ COMM.INFO,REM ❑ COMM.ACTION ITEM ITEM 0 'Jr.SDS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ Jr.So$,DISCUSSION bm (NON-GONSENT) ❑ BLIC HEARING .3© Jr.SOS.MEETu.IG DATE ��• Jr.BOS.AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.10.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Originator) PDC: POC FAHR:7-9-97 FAHR ALL 2210, Gary G.Streed,2600 EXEC: EXEC ---T—STEER: STEERS Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.Bos:7-30-97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordina: SEWER SERVICE CHARGES - PROPOSITION 218 CERTIFICATION (All Districts) FAHR Committee Recommendation: The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee referred this item to the Steering Committee at their meeting of July 30, 1997. Recommended Action(s): 1. Authorize staff to execute the Proposition 218 Certification as required by the County of Orange. CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on N/A Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination glad on CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9.1 eves.11. T—m ) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ N/A N/A N/A N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS ScheduladUrn,Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SchedulelLine Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year In Budget: N/A N/A NIA $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $0.00 WL PROJECmbeT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REOUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE SiYE 1( s,;iota number. — Ten_Permanent Limited Te YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Rsiva MI"7 Page 1 of 2 H:\WP.DTATlNU2lOkCRANEWAHRTAHR.97UULYIFAHR97.52 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(UsI)'. � 1. Sauer Se wCharges-Praposhbn 218 Cergr"bon Originator Date CONCURRENCES: Signature Date Manager( r D ) @> 9 f ATTACHMENTS TO JOINS-PropBOARDS n 21S Ce(lht) / U � {- �7 1. Sever&erv�e Charges-PropoNtlon 2lS CeNfratlon store Data Department Hea (Or Designee) Sign re Date Want General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) The County Tax Collector and Auditor-Controller have recently prepared a memo, together with a draft certification to all public agencies that utilize the County Tax rolls for collection of user charges or fees. Specifically, they are requiring the agency to sign a certification that the fees and charges are in compliance with the requirements of Proposition 218, that the agency will agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County of Orange and all of its entities, agencies and officers; and that if any judgment is entered in favor of a claimant third party against the County or any of the indemnified parties, they Can offset the amount of judgment against any revenues collected. The estimated user fees to be collected in 1997-98 as a separate line item on the property tax bill total $63,177,000 for all Districts. Collecting these fees on the tax bill is the most cost-effective method of collection. Should there be a law suit regarding Proposition 218, the Districts would need to take the lead to protect our position and revenues. The requested certification does not change our position or increase our liability. Recommendation That staff be authorized to execute the Proposition 218 Certification as required by the County of Orange. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager aea Mw? Page 2 of 2 H:IW P.DTAWIN122101CRANEIFAHRIFAHR.9TUULMERT2f S.PRP , SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPOSITION 218 CERTIFICATION The COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 hereby certifies that the special assessments, special taxes, parcel taxes, charges, and/or fees which are to be placed on the FY 1997-98 property tax roll meet the requirements of Proposition 218 which added Articles XIIIC and MID to the State Constitution. The COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County of Orange, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange, the County of Orange Auditor-Controller and Treasurer- Tax Collector, and Orange County officers and employees from litigation over whether the requirements of Proposition 218 were met with respect to these special assessments, special taxes, parcel taxes, charges, and/or fees. If any judgment is entered against any indemnified party as a result of not meeting the requirements of Proposition 218 for these special assessments, special taxes, parcel taxes, charges, and/or fees, the COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 agrees that the County of Orange may offset the amount of anyjudgment paid by an indemnified party from any monies collected by the County of Orange on behalf of the COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, including property taxes, special assessments, special taxes, parcel taxes, charges, or fees. Signature of Authorized Representative of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 Title of Authorized Signer Date I�.tl16 gel ti STEVEN 6. LEWIS A�OROR•CONTROUER ' NTY OF FINANC!BUILmNa I 22 CMC CENTER Pt P. o. Box x) SANTA ANA•CA BiTV2 561 a 3 RANGE TELEPHONE:w-x�m AREA COOS 714 OFFICE OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER June 30, 1997 __—_-1.0._. _.. ._.._Claw.GIs.and Special Disni2s ATTEbMON: Fina`x<Directors and Public Works Msnagers SUHIECr: 1997-98 Special Assessrneab CartificadonAndentnd=t+on Bequaaaeot This office has recerved agmfiata reaaranw to =plunrsmng Star Association of County Auditors Guidelines on Propogmop 218.as nnF=nymph 15 of my subject letter dated April 30, 1997. All= talking to legal counsel, I mm rauivdusg such requce tents for subject is arufi®nanHodevuufiotimt before placing special esvessmmtWEs on the County's property tax bills I will however require the attached cgre=atim. II I believe the atmrhed catificatiaet addresses any coconTms you may have had, and I request your COopervam in responding to it Please let roe know nrnediately if you sm unwilling to sign and r: submd do rmw mrlScam with try speera ofsessmae,tn requests Additionally, please, rote chat all other rEgwancros stated to my letter of April 3G,4997 mctudmg a certified resolution of your governing body direamg the Auditor-Controller to add your assessment to she tax roll soh apply. Steven E.Lewis AuddoE-Conrnller JMLd-]r ..— . . . Arta,+ cc: James Mmermeier,GriefEuwtive OEccr Was Ruaoe,Director, Sttaregm Afftas,CEO Lon Watson, Carty Counsel Bob Austin, County Comsel _. . b selx.xe SAMPLE (Place on your Letterhead) SFECfAL ASSFSSME.N'IS CERTIFICATION ' The (CSty/Spmal District/Sdod Dieuia) berehy rn45o that the spaial assaanara, speaal taxes, pamd axes, dargRs and/or Bees which are to be placed m the FP 1997-99 ptopary tm roll haw been duly adopted in accordance with law and are legal and valid Sip=a ofAtuh==d Repreamtatw of City Corma7/ Special District Board ofLhrea«a/Schcol Dignict Board Idle of Authorized Signet Date LAW DFFK15 p WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART PROfFBBIOVALCMPOMT0.V 701 SOUTH PARKER STREET.SUITE 7OX)R ORAMOE,CA 95368.6M R 17161559.7WO R FAx 17141835.7767 DIRECT On(716)564-2605 DIRECT FAX(714)565-2505 July 11, 1997 Mr. Steven E. Lewis, County Auditor- Controller County of Orange 12 Civic Center Plaza Post Office Box 567 Santa Ana, CA 92702-0567 Re: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Sanitary Sewer Service Charges Dear Mr. Lewis: On behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, we wish to acknowledge and thank you for your letter dated June 30, 1997, advising that you were withdrawing your previous request of April 30, 1997. that all public agencies seeking to have their assessments or service charges collected on the Tax Roll pursuant to authorized provisions of statutory law, execute a certificate of compliance and indemnification. We have reviewed the revised certificate which you have now requested to be executed, and regrettably, we still must advise that the appropriate officers of the Districts are unable to execute that certificate. While we certainly recognize the concern of you and perhaps the other auditors throughout the State of California concerning the possible legal challenges to adoption of fees, charges and assessments, we must indicate that we are unable to have the Chairman of the District or even the general management execute the proposed certificate because it is essentially requiring them to certify as to a matter of law. Those elected officials and appointed management are simply not trained or able to make that judgment which rightfully will only be able to be made by an appropriate court of proper jurisdiction. In all probability, that will be the California Supreme Court. As for a possibility of General Counsel executing the certificate, that is analogous to having General Counsel issue a bond counsel opinion, which I, as the Districts' General Counsel, am not prepared to issue. I am prepared to provide to you a statement that says that the Districts have followed the appropriate procedures of law for the enactment and T YC.AVDRUER. A YEBWNINORM.=BOBRK•BET'C.BURNER•IORNECAVAVAUORBDU100.FA0.RINOTON RODE LR.RCK•tOSkPN W.PRiBATR R KRIBI.PoRKV60F]OFA•LOp E.RSRIBY•MAOO.U.ENA IDWNtA\T RTpMAE F.YIXON IASON E RgNN%•IONN R.SNAW�KFNNMD 0.RNRT.IR.�BAVB:1.F&KE 6WIELK.9NNBIJN R AIAV R.WATIB�INOMM L MVOpIUFP Mr. Steven E. Lewis, July 11, 1997 Page 2 adoption of its ordinances wherein their user charges have been adopted. But, anything in addition to that is simply beyond the legal parameters that I am able to provide. It is my recommendation that your office withhold any further requests for certificates until such time as there is a more definitive evaluation of the law by rulings of courts of appeal or the California Supreme Court, so that all parties will know exactly what the applicable rules will be. In the meantime, I am simply unable to advise my clients that they should execute the certificate which you have submitted. I will be more happy than to review this with you or with County Counsel if you have any thoughts, concerns or suggestions. Based on the above, I have advised my client to proceed on the assumption that your office will not require this certificate to be executed by the Districts and that the user charges that have been recently enacted by ordinance and will be submitted to your office in accordance with all of the other requirements of your April 30th letter, will be placed on the Tax Rolls for FY 97-98. If that is not the action that your office will take, I would ask that you notify me immediately so that we may consider other alternatives. Very truly yours, WOODRUFF, SIPPRADLIN & SMART HOMAS L. WOODRUFF TLW:mra Enclosures cc: John Collins, Joint Chairman Boards of Directors Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 July 2, 1997 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 • 108" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY. JULY 2. 1997-5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on July 2,1997, at the Districts' Plant No. 2 Operations Center. Prior to the meeting, a plant tour was provided for Directors and staff conducted by Bob Ooten. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: _ Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John Collins, Joint Chair Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer Peer Swan,Vice Joint Chair Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Steve Anderson Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Don Bankhead (Pro tem) Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Margie L. Rice Nick Arhontes, Mgr., Collection Facilities O&M Dave Sullivan Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Hank Wedaa Adrian Renescu, Enforcement& Permit Supv. Charles E. Sylvia Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialist Mark Leyes Kevin Hadden, ECM Supervisor Mark Esquer, Engr. Supervisor- O&M Pat Magnante, Committee Secretary Absent: Chris Norby Others Present: John E. Noyes James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair DWG Associates (1) John Carollo Engineers (1) Tule Ranch (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 July 2, 1997 Following adoption of the Basin Plan Admendment, the Regional Board is focusing on designated areas in the Off-shore Zone for protection for body-contact recreation. • A group of interest folks, including several members of the Surfrider's group, took a boat trip last Friday to the outfall. The Regional Board will be sponsoring workshops in the future. The Directors will be invited on the next boat trip. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given by General Counsel. DISCUSSION ITEM ( items) 1. OMTS97-013 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. FOR PRIVATE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DISTRICTS' OXYGEN GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2. Motion, Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to execute an amendment to the original agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the private operation and maintenance of the districts' oxygen generation system at Plant No. 2, approved as to form by the Districts' Contracts/Purchasing Manager. 2. OMTS97-014 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT otio Information only. 3. OMTS97-015 REPORT ON COOPERATIVE COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAMS. Motion: Information only. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS IF ANY No other business. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California - P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, JULY 2. 1997-5,30 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on July 2,1997, at the Districts' Plant No. 2 Operations Center. Prior to the meeting, a plant tour was provided for Directors and staff conducted by Bob Ooten. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: _ Present: Staff Present: Pat McGuigan, Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager John Collins, Joint Chair Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Bob Dolan, Director of Operations & Maintenance Steve Anderson Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Don Bankhead (Pro tem) Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Margie L. Rice Nick Arhontes, Mgr., Collection Facilities O&M Dave Sullivan Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Hank Wades Adrian Renescu, Enforcement& Permit Supv. Charles E. Sylvia Layne Baroldi, Regulatory Specialist Mark Leyes Kevin Hadden, ECM Supervisor Mark Esquer, Engr. Supervisor-O&M Pat Magnante, Committee Secretary Absent, Chris Norby Others Present: John E. Noyes James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair DWG Associates (1) John Carollo Engineers (1) Tule Ranch (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 July 2, 1997 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the June 4, 1997 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted after clarification of the action taken on Item 2. (OMTS97-010) was requested by Director Leyes. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR No report was given. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Don McIntyre, General Manager, reported on four items: • The court awarded $100,000 in additional court costs in the SanGermano case. It will be appealed as a part of the total appeal package. • A one-year contract with the Supervisory, Professional and Management Team (SPMT) was approved with 3 to 1 support. This was the last contract to be ratified -the 501 and CWEA contract negotiations were completed earlier this year. • AB769, the special legislation which would allow consolidation of the Districts, has gone to Gov. Wilson for his signature. The bill went to the Govemor with a"recommendation to sign". • Once again, the Districts will be represented at the Orange County Fair July 11-27. Directors are invited to stop by our Booth (#8) and to contact Michelle Tuchman on Ext. 2050 if you would like to volunteer to help staff the booth. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER No report was given. REPORT OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIONS OFFICER No report was given. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee _ Page 3 July 2, 1997 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Robert Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance, provided handouts and reported on the following items: • Three charts were distributed on plant emissions that indicated a significant amount of emissions although the Districts meet all parameters of the AQMD permit. • Portions of the Black&Veatch De-regulation Study have been received. The power plants are qualifying facilities and the Districts will be paid on the real-time market in the future. We can influence the amount of energy we sell during peak times by turning off parts of the plant. Director Wedaa requested that the distributed emissions charts be converted to ppm. Nancy Wheatley offered to provide a copy of Kevin Hadden's monthly charts referencing NOCs and CO to Director Wedaa. 0&M Monthly Report Operations& Maintenance Monthly Report: An Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Monthly Report for the OMITS Committee is submitted for review. The report focuses on compliance, safety, financial projects and performance measure for O&M and is intended to provide the Committee members with O&M information on a timely basis. A running trend of flows was also distributed that will be included in future Monthly Reports. Director Wedaa requested copies of the Compliance Tracking charts. Motion: Moved, seconded and carried to receive and file the report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, reported on five items: • Air report follow-up. The Ozone and PM 2.5 Regulations have been endorsed by the President and will go forward. There will be tighter control on particulates and on ozone in basins and areas such as the South Coast air basin. This has the potential to affect our operation. Regulations will be put in place. • It has recently been informally suggested that Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air at the EPA, will leave her post in September to accept another position running an environmental trust fund. Bob Perciasepe will leave the Water Section and go to the Air Section to replace Ms. Nichols. • The Basin Plan Amendment for the Santa Ana River Basin Plan, which affects water quality off-shore, has been placed on the State Board's July consent calendar. Once approved by the State Board, it has to go to the Office of Administrative Law and the EPA. Approval is anticipated by both agencies. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 July 2, 1997 • Following adoption of the Basin Plan Admendment, the Regional Board is focusing on designated areas in the Off-shore Zone for protection for body-contact recreation. • A group of interest folks, including several members of the Surfrider's group, took a boat trip last Friday to the outfall. The Regional Board will be sponsoring workshops in the future. The Directors will be invited on the next boat trip. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL No report was given by General Counsel. DISCUSSION ITEM ( items) 1. OMTS97-013 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. FOR PRIVATE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DISTRICTS' OXYGEN GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2. Motion: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize the General Manager to execute an amendment to the original agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the private operation and maintenance of the districts' oxygen generation system at Plant No. 2, approved as to form by the Districts' Contracts/Purchasing Manager. 2. OMT897-014 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT o 'o Information only. 3. OMTS97-015 REPORT ON COOPERATIVE COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAMS. Motiom Information only. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY No other business. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 July 2, 1997 MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING • Regulation Discussion-Strategies for Regional Model Grease Ordinance CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Strategic Workshop is scheduled for August 2, 1997. The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for September 3,.1997 at the Districts'Administrative Offices. ADJOURNMENT The Chair dedared the meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Submitted by: Patricia Magnante Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary H:1WP.DTAIOM%3410WIAGNANTE10Mr5 C-1VULT971MINUTE5.797 For 60 S, IT-ON AGENDA ❑ COMM.INFO.ITEM ITEM q❑ COMM,ACTION ITEM ❑ JT.BDS,CONSENT DISCUSSION TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT.BDSN-CONENT) (NON-CONSENT) o n ❑ PUBLIC HEARING 7 ✓&JT.BOB,MEETING DATE AX. el, JT.BDS.AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE COMM. to. NO,�.s � DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: 07/02/97 OMTSTy —v1 (Onginator) PDC: POC FAHR: FAHR Division 3410, Mark Esquer, X3010 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: 07/23/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordina: AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. FOR PRIVATE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DISTRICTS' OXYGEN GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2: The Operations- Maintenance Department requests consideration from the Board of Directors to amend several terms and conditions of the original agreement for an estimated cost savings of$215,000 for each year of the remaining seven (7)years of the fifteen year contract. Recommended Action(s): 1. Authorize the General Manager to execute an amendment to the original agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the private operation and maintenance of the Districts'oxygen generation system at Plant No. 2, approved as to form by the Districts' Contracts/Purchasing Manager. CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC Date Notice of Exemption Filed: ITEM: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination fled on Resolution No. 89-108 CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES ITarelewcm Rlw Trmnerq TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$400,000 $400,000 $0 $400,000 $400,000 SOURCE: JO SchedulelLlne Items:36 Oxygen Plant O&M AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGETCHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION BUDGETTOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: N/A NIA NIA NIA Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITIVENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION P0,CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $485,000.00 $0.00 ($215,000.00) $270,000.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,state number: _Permanent Limits I Tenn If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CSDOC 0 P,O. Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 0 (714)962-2411 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(List) 1. Staff Report dated 06/16/97 Originator Date CONCURRENCES: Signature Date Division Manager(Or Designee) ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) 1. Stag Report,dated 06/16/97 Signature % 1 Date Depanm ea rD It ) G Sig ature Data Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and Summary) The Districts own a cryogenic,oxygen generation system at Plant No.2 in Huntington Beach for the continuous supply of oxygen gas for use In the 90 mgd activated sludge process(secondary treatment). The Districts operated and maintained this equipment from start-up in 1982 to August 1989,when the Districts entered into a fifteen(15)year agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc(APCI)for the private operation and maintenance of the system. The agreement with APCI was developed due to the complex nature of operating and maintaining the cryogenic equipment. APCI is responsible for the 24-hour per day operation,maintenance,repair,spare parts and continuous supply of oxygen. The fifteen year agreement with APCI was approved by the Board of Directors in August 1989(Resolution No.89.100). Upon commencement of APCI's services,the District paid$397,00 for the first year of service which reduced the Districts'costs by$74,D00 per year. The annual payment to APCI is reviewed each year and adjusted based on increases/decreases in the Consumer Price Index(Urban)for the Los Angeles area(CPI-U). The Districts annual payment to APCI has increased over the past eight years by 23%to approximately$485,000. A Districts benchmarking effort indicated that our oxygen generation cost per million gallons of secondary treatment is higher than that of our two sister agencies and also indicated the new technology available for oxygen production. Staff commissioned a study(by Montgomery Watson Engineers, dated September 1996) to review various capital and operational alternatives to determine if building new facilities using new technology would further lower the Districts'costs and to provide an assessment of the cast of various alternatives(refer to study). The study concluded that the Districts would not realize a cast benefit by building new capital facilities at this time;however,it did reaffirm that there is a potential to lower costs by modifying the O&M contract. Staff commissioned another study to audit APCI's performance over the past eight years of the agreement. The study concluded that the facilities are in satisfactory condition but that the Districts costs,when compared to newer oxygen technologies, are between 30%to 35% higher than benchmark and new technology. Using new technology life-cycle costs to produce oxygen as a benchmark at$30 per ton,slag requested APCI to lower its operating costs to below the benchmark cast. After a series of discussions and negotiations,APCI made an offer to decrease their annual cost by$215,000 per year, bringing the Districts'unit cost to$30 per ton. In order to negotiate a lower annual cast, other terms of the agreement were revised. These"other'negotiated terms,such as the annual maintenance cap being lowered from $250,000 to$125,000 and the Termination for Convenience clause being modified to provide APCI at least two years of service,result in minimal risk being transferred to the Districts in return for lower contract amounts. (See attached staff report for more detailed information). At this point in time,staff did not pursue rebidding the agreement for the private operation and maintenance of the oxygen generation system at Plant No.2 for the following reasons.(1)There is a financial penalty for terminating the present APCI agreement at this time,approximately $60,000. (2)No oxygen contractors were located who would bid APCI's present scope of work,whereby APCI is responsible for a continuous supply of oxygen and for operating and maintaining these facilities,with repair and replacement costs coming directly out of their annual fee. APCI is completely responsible for this equipment for the fifteen years of the agreement. (3)Producing bid documents and a performance specification for bidding an O&M contract to get lower costs would require a significant amount of staff time and costs,and would lock the Districts into another long tens contract. (4)The Districts are in the process of developing a new Strategic Plan which may after any new agreement put in place. (5)There are significant cast savings that can be realized by amending the original agreement with APCI. (6)And, the proposed agreement amendment allows the Districts to terminate the APCI agreement two years after the date of the amendment,without a financial penalty. Staff recommends authorizing the General Manager to execute an amendment to the original agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the private operation and maintenance of the Districts'oxygen generation equipment at Plant No.2. The negotiated amendment will reduce costs by $215,000 per year and continue to provide a high level of service and support. LPK:pjm c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager H\WP.DTA\OM\34101KRAEMER\CRVOOM2.AIT 2 June 17, 1997 STAFF REPORT Subject: Amendment to Original Agreement with Air Products and Chemicals Inc. for Private Operation and Maintenance of the Districts Oxygen Generation System at Plant No. 2 Background The Districts own a cryogenic, oxygen generation system at Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach for the continuous supply of oxygen gas for use in the 90 mgd activated sludge process (secondary treatment). The Districts operated and maintained this equipment from start-up in 1982 to August 1989, when the Districts entered into a 15-year operation and maintenance agreement with Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (APCI). APCI has successfully performed the obligations of the agreement for the past eight years as documented in their annual reports and as observed by the Districts' operations and maintenance staff. The fifteen year Agreement with APCI was approved by the Board of Directors in August 1989 (Resolution No. 89-108). APCI is responsible for a continuous supply of oxygen up to 72.5 tons per day. If for any reason the system is unable to produce the required daily supply of oxygen, APCI supplies the required oxygen from one of it's own California facilities, or other sources, at no cost to the Districts. Contract services include responsibility for the day-today activities of the system and the maintenance and long-term care of the equipment. The contract includes all preventative, scheduled, unscheduled and emergency maintenance of the oxygen generation equipment. APCI is compensated for their work by being paid an annual fee subject to escalation based on the Consumer Price Index (Urban)for the Los Angeles Area (CPI- U). APCI is responsible for the first $250,000 per year of repair and replacement costs up to a lifetime cap of$1,100,000; after that, the Districts are responsible for the costs. Upon commencement of APCI's services in 1989, the Districts paid $397,000 for the first year of service plus a one time capital cost of$439,000 to enable APCI remote monitoring and control. The Districts annual payment has increased 23%, based on the CPI-U, over the past eight years to the current annual amount of$485,000. APCI's repair and replacement maintenance expenditures over the past seven years from 1989 to 1996 are $0, $0, $13,083, $3,063, $20,100, $47,180, and $52,774 , respectively, totaling $138,849. 1 of 4 Bench-marking Studies and Technical Reports In 1996, through bench-marking efforts and discussions with vendors touting new oxygen generation technology, the Districts realized that its oxygen generation costs ($/ton of 02 produced) for secondary treatment are higher than our two sister agencies' production costs. Staff commissioned a study to review various alternative aeration methods to determine if the Districts' costs could be lowered and to provide an assessment of the cost of various alternatives (refer to study by Montgomery Watson Engineers dated September 1996). The study evaluated whether the Districts should continue operating the existing cryogenic equipment or convert to a vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) oxygen production system or to a conventional air fine bubble aeration system. The study concluded that the Districts would not realize a cost benefit by converting the process from oxygen to air but that there is potential to further lower costs by utilizing new technologies or by modifying the 0&M contract for the existing cryogenic system. The new VSA technology for oxygen production is very energy efficient and cost effective in facilities ranging in size from 20 to 100 tons per day. However, when compared to the Districts' cryogenic system (which is essentially paid for), VSA is less attractive due to the large capital investment needed to construct new facilities. Another drawback to incorporating this technology into the process at this point in time is that the Districts' Strategic Plan will not be complete for a few years. The Strategic Plan will provide the Districts direction in terms of which technology the Districts should employ and the quantity of oxygen gas that will be required in the future. For these reasons, Staff commissioned DWG &Associates, an expert consulting firm in oxygen generation, to perform an audit of the Districts' cryogenic facilities and the operation and maintenance agreement with APCI. This analysis (which later became the basis for negotiating the APCI agreement) included an evaluation of the current state of the cryogenic facilities, an evaluation of whether CSDOC staff could operate the facilities more cost effectively than APCI, and a market survey comparison looking at the Districts cryogenic costs and VSA technology. The DWG report states that the Districts cryogenic facilities are in satisfactory condition and implies that there is no reason why these facilities should not operate for the remaining seven years of the APCI agreement. (A copy of the DWG report is attached.) The study concluded that the Districts costs, when compared to newer oxygen technologies, are between 30% to 35% higher than they should be. Using the VSA costs (approximately $30 per ton of oxygen produced) as a benchmark, staff requested APCI to lower its operating costs. After a series of discussions and negotiations, APCI made an offer to decrease their annual cost by $215,000 per year, bringing the Districts' unit cost to approximately $30 per ton. Staff has successfully negotiated several of the terms and conditions of the APCI agreement which will reduce costs by $215,000 per year and continue to provide a high level of service and support. 2 of 4 Amendment Terms and Conditions Attached is copy of the proposed amendments to the original agreement with APCI. Several sections were modified in the amendment and a few sections added; they are: Section 6 - Payment, Section 9 - Limits on Costs of Equipment Replacements, Section 11 - Special Tasks to be Included in Operation and Maintenance of the Oxygen Generation System , Section 19 -Termination for Convenience, Appendix E, and Appendix G. The following discussion summarizes each revision. In Section 6, the annual fee is reduced from $397,000 and eight years of escalation at the CPI-U (approximately $485,000 in Fiscal Year 1997/98), to $270,000 and escalation continues at the CPI-U. This results in a direct reduction in costs by $215,000. Also added to this section is an incentive clause which provides financial benefits to both the Districts and APCI. The incentive allows APCI to earn an additional payment for keeping the oxygen generation system on-stream more than 99% of available time. By keeping the system on-stream, the oxygen generation system produces and stores more liquid oxygen (a direct by-product of oxygen gas production). This liquid oxygen can be used during Force Majeure events and therefore provides the Districts with additional reliability in the event its needed. The maximum financial exposure assumed by the Districts for this additional incentive clause is approximately $5,500, (3.65 days ' $75/ton of liquid oxygen '40 tons/ day ) ' 0.5). In the past eight years of operation, APCI has averaged a 98.4% on-stream time; therefore, if the past continues to repeat itself, the Districts will not pay any more compensation to APCI as a result of this clause. In Section 9, the annual maintenance cap was reduced from $250,000 and a lifetime cap of$1,100,000, to an annual cap of$125,000 and a resulting $875,000 lifetime cap if the contract is continued for seven more years. This results in an additional $125,000 financial exposure to the Districts for repair and replacement costs; however, over the past eight years maintenance expenses have been well below the newly proposed $125,000. In Section 11, two sections have been added, one to provide the Districts with annual safety training in the production and use of gaseous oxygen, and another to provide an avenue to retain APCI for consulting services which fall outside their scope of work under this agreement. In Section 19, the termination for convenience clause is modified to give APCI at least one year and three months of work from the date of this amendment, at which time the Districts can terminate the agreement at any time. (The termination period remains unchanged at nine months). Also deleted from this section is the payment schedule which provided APCI with additional compensation should the Districts terminate the agreement. This reduces the Districts financial exposure over the remaining seven years of the agreement by eliminating the requirement to compensate APCI for early termination. 3 of4 In Appendix E, the Home Office and Field Services Rate Schedules for APCI's employees are adjusted for current rates. These expenses have increased on average by about 50% over the past eight years. This change will increase maintenance costs and will ultimately bring APCI's annual repair and replacement costs closer to the annual cap of $125,000. This will slightly increase the Districts financial risks. Estimated Cost Savings Cost savings, as a result of amending the agreement with APCI, are estimated at $215,000 per year, totaling $1,505,000 over the remaining seven years of the agreement. The Districts will be assuming more risk , approximately $125,000 more than previous years, on a yearly basis for the repair and replacement maintenance costs, but not on the lifetime cap if the contract is run out for seven years. The Districts exposure for the incentive clause to maximize on-stream performance is at most $5,000. Based on the previous eight years of experience, staff and its consultants are confident that savings will be close to $215,000 per year. Other Considerations At this point in time, staff did not pursue rebidding the agreement for the private operation and maintenance of the oxygen generation system at Plant No. 2 for the following reasons. (1) There is a significant financial penalty for terminating the APCI agreement at this time, approximately $60,000. (2)There are no other known agreements that are structured similar to the APCI agreement; whereby APCI is responsible for a continuous supply of oxygen and for operating and maintaining these facilities, with repair and replacement costs coming directly out of their annual fee. APCI is completely responsible for this equipment for the fifteen years of the agreement. (3) Producing bid documents and a performance specification for bidding an O&M contract would require a significant amount of staff time and costs, and would lock the Districts into another long term contract. (4) The Districts are in the process of developing a new Strategic Plan which may alter any new agreement put in place. (5) And, there are significant cost savings that can be realized by amending the original agreement with APCI. Recommendation Staff recommends authorizing the General Manager to execute an amendment to the original agreement with Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. for the private operation and maintenance of the Districts' oxygen generation equipment at Plant No. 2. The negotiated amendment will reduce costs by $215,000 per year and continue to provide a high level of service and support. 4 of 4 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue ' Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday July 3. 1997 at 5:30 p.m, A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on July 3, 1997, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present, Staff Present: Burnie Dunlap, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager Tom Carroll David Ludwin, Director of Engineering John Collins, Joint Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Patsy Marshall Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Eva Miner-Bradford Jim Herberg, Engineering Supervisor Christina Shea Todd Spitzer Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Absent Others Present: Shirley Dettloff, Vice Chair Bill Knopf, Carollo Engineers Brian Donahue Marcus Linden, CDM Bob Zemel Keith London, CDM APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the June 5, 1997 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair advised that as a result of cencems raised regarding the process of design and construction engineering, and change orders associated with the process, and some specific requests by PDC Committee members, the Steering Committee has approved that we hire a consultant to meet with each of us to discuss those issues, concems and values associated with the Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 2 July 3, 1997 planning, design, and construction process. The consultant would then have a Saturday workshop for all Directors. The goal is not only to explain the process, but to give Directors an opportunity to input values and concerns and possibly come up with some recommendations and considerations. The consultant would look at this objectively as an outside party, and someone who does not have an investment in the process. The consultant to be hired has expertise in sanitation districts and is retired from the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. He has been interviewed by the General Manager, the Joint Chair, and the Assistant General Manager of Operations. The Chair added that this will be a good opportunity for the Committee to have input into the process. Any changes that may be recommended would go to the Joint Board for approval. At present, the Steering Committee has approved the recommendation of hiring a consultant. The Saturday workshop will be in the fall after the consultant has had a chance to meet with each Committee member individually. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair agreed that the hiring of a consultant was a positive step. He advised that no formal action is required to undertake this because it was approved by the Steering Committee and is within the General Manager's authority to enter into a consulting agreement with the consultant. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager was not present. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION The Assistant General Manager of Administration was not present. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-OPERATIONS The Assistant General Manager of Operations advised that the recommended consultant for the workshop session is Frank Dryden, a civil engineer. He left the Los Angeles Sanitation Districts in the late 70s and has been working as an independent consultant since that time. He has a lot of strengths as both an engineer and a communicator which will help in getting views from new Directors as well as those Directors who have been here for some time. We see it as a good, positive step for taking a close look at the PDC Committee which has been in its present format for the past couple of years. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering reported on the item brought to the Committee last month regarding the seismic upgrades project. Director Miner-Bradford requested at that meeting that we present to the Committee a description of our seismic upgrade program. This will be placed on the agenda for discussion at the August PDC Committee meeting. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 3 July 3, 1997 MONTHLY REPORT ON CHANGE ORDERS Information Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Report dated July 3, 1997. He brought attention to the second change order on the spreadsheet. Under Changed Condition it reads $18,817; it should read $50,116. Under Errors and Omissions it reads $42,862; it should read $6,564. QUARTERLY REPORT ON CHANGE ORDERS Information Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Quarterly Change Order Report dated July 3, 1997. QUARTERLY REPORT ON PSA ADDENDA Information Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Quarterly Report on PSA Addenda dated July 3, 1997. ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 1-4) 1. PDC97-24: DISCUSSION REGARDING SELECTION PROCESS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH RESPECT TO OFFICE LOCATION OF THE FIRMS. RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action recommended by staff. DISCUSSION: The Director of Engineering reviewed the table of information provided with the Agenda package that outlined the consultants currently (as of April) doing work for the Districts, the fees and locations of their headquarters, and local offices. There was discussion as to the development of a policy that gives preference to Orange County firths, for selection, all else being equal. It was decided to not develop a written policy, but rather have a preference to local firms during the selection process. In addition, a semi-annual report should be prepared by staff outlining the consultants solicited for proposals and the selected consultant. 2. PDC97-33: CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1 WITH COUCH BROS., INC., DBA COUCH & SONS, FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (Districts 3 and 11): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 6 providing 13 items of additional work and granting a time extension of 101 calendar days for completion of the additional work. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 6 to Contract No. 11-17-1 with Colich Bros., Inc., dba Colich & Sons, for an addition of$92,305.00 and 101 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $6,005,724.03. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve recommended action. 3. PDC97-34: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO JOB NOS. P1-41, P1-43, P1-44, P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021 AND SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3, 4,AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1; SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON-STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 1; SEISMIC RETROFIT AT Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 4 July 3, 1997 PLANT NO. 1; REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS D THROUGH Q AT PLANT NO. 2; SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON-STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2; SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 2; TUNNEL COVER REPLACEMENT AT BILLINGS TUNNEL AT PLANT NO. 2; AND SLUDGE PIPING MODIFICATION AT PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS 6-15: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 1 providing eleven items of added and deleted work and granting a time extension of 37 days for completion of the added work. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 1 to Job No. P1-41, at al, with Margate Construction, for a deduction of$85,680.00 decreasing the total contract amount to $8,375,458.00, and an addition of 37 calendar days time extension. DISCUSSION: There was discussion regarding the development of a Geographical Information System (GIS)to provide a database of information on the Districts' facilities and equipment. Staff was directed to report to the Committee regarding the plans for such a system at the appropriate time. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve recommended action. 4. PDC97-35: ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE (CDM) FOR JOB NOS. J-40-1 AND J-40-2 RE PREPARATION OF PHASE 1 OF STRATEGIC PLAN (ALL DISTRICTS): The Director of Engineering requests approval of an Addendum to the PSA providing for additional work in three areas: (1) updating trunk sewer system information contained in the Districts' CASSWORKS data base, (2) development of pump station discharge curves, and (3) additional public, staff, and Board meeting support. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Addendum No. 3 to the PSA with CDM in the amount of $199,489 for a total amount not to exceed $1,958,717. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to approve the recommended action. Staff was asked to provide further explanation regarding deficiencies in the CASSWORKS database. This will be provided at the August PDC Meeting. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS, OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 5 July 3, 1997 CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday, August 7, 1997. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Submitted by: ail Cain Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Secretary :gc H:WP.DTAIEHGWDCWUULWIN WPD Fer Ba.sec.Uea OnN❑ COMM.WFO.REM AGENDA a ❑ caend.AcnDNrtDH ITEM ❑ Jr.SM.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ xr.BOs.WB SIOH ,p m (NONLVNSENT) ❑ PUBLIC HEARING sal al MEETING DATE JT.aDS.M3ENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE comm.ID.NO- DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS'. OMTS (01,41mNar) Poc 7/3/97 PDC tl- 3 FAHR: FAHR DIOS:= 3790, Bud Palmquist, Ext. 5132 EXEC EXEC 3&11 STEER'. STEER Dirriaton No.,Name,arld Extension JT aos. 723/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wording: CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1 WITH COUCH BROS., INC. DBA COUCH & SONS, FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (Districts 3 and 11) The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 6 providing thirteen items of additional work and granting a time extension of 101 calendar days for completion of the additional work. Recommended Action(s): 1. Approve Change Order No. 6 to Contract No. 11-17-1 with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons for an addition of$92,305.00 and 101 calendar days, increasing the total Contract amount to $6,005,724.03. CEQA REVIEW: ProjM Is Eseni NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOAR D ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Final EIR Approved on 7/19189 aM Notice of Determination filM on 7/20M9 March 1996 CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-0ATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES tTnn a,aan n•• Tn.a ens TOTAL BUDGETED ANI$8,059,000.00 $785,000 $600,000 $185,000 $785 000 SOURCE: DISTRICTS3&11 Scheduaft.me Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: &Itedule1me Item. TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AR PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budge: 1989 Masser Plan Estimate:INS $7,243,000.00 $816,000.00 $0.00 $8.059,000.00 Year of First Costs 1989 THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $5,626,370.00 $287,049.03 $92,305.00 $6,005,724.03 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,state number _Permanent _Limited Term If YES,esplain m ADDITIONAL INFORMATION se Wn H'1WP.DTAIENGIENGU 1-17-1NITJULY.WPD n� ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE Table AGENDA(List): j `7 1. Budget In Order Son Table Ori Inator ^� 2. Change Order Stator Report 3. Chengc Order No.6. If CON RRENCES: 6-/B- Sig Lure Date D sionA an er0 ea ) &7 ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT 90A11DS AGENDA(List) Sign Date 1. Budget lnlornutlon Table D¢Pa Ol nt tl e i9ne 2. Change Order Status Repod % CC 3. Signed Change Order No.6 gnature ate 3/` Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - Contract No. 11-17-1, Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, provides for the construction of a new 29 million gallons per day(MGD) pumping station, 42-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) and 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) gravity lines, and a 36-inch ductile iron force main. The design for this$5.7 million project was performed by Carollo Engineers and the construction contract was awarded in November 1993 to Colich Bros. Inc. dba as Colich & Sons. This contract is 95% complete. Change Order No. 6 is an addition of$92,305.00 to the contract for thirteen items of additional work, and a time extension of 101 calendar days. The following is a summary of the contract: Original Contract Price S 5,626,370.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 287,049.03 Change Order No. 6 $ 92,305.00 Percentage Increase 6.7% Amended Contract Price S 6,005-724.03 ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE 1 Replacement of 6-inch and 12-inch $36,298.00 14 Changed Condition ACP water lines 2 Installation of vent line from Manhole No. 12 $13,656.00 7 Design Change 3 Structural modifications to catwalk supports $6,564.00 0 Error 4 City of Huntington Beach Street restoration requirements $16,500.00 7 Other 5 Damage due to dewatering system shutdown and heavy rains $11,689.00 5 Changed condition 6 Manual bypass switch for the UPS system $2,45T00 1 Design change 7 Restoring two eastbound and two westbound traffic lanes $1,800.00 1 Other 6 Temporary standby generator $1,273.00 1 Changed condition H'%W P.DTATNGENGI 1-17-1 WIT-JULY.W PD �- ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE Y Change in lia-in of&inch City sewer — 9 from MH#24 to MH#12 $655.00 1 Changed condition 10 Repair of City 8-inch VCP sewer line $553.00 0 Other Additional pipe support in sump 11 pump well $160.00 0 Design change Regrading of driveway and sidewalk 12 area in front of new station $500.00 0 Design change 13 Time extensions inclement weather $0.00 64 Other TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.6 $92,305.00 101 All of the above items, except Item No. 3, would have been included in the scope of the original contract, if discovered or known in the design phase. Item 3 has a cost associated with the error identified above, which requires reimbursement by the designer and has been negotiated with Carollo Engineers for the portion that involves re-work. The-District will be reimbursed $6,564.00. Liquidated damages on this contract is$500 per day and there are no bonus provisions for the pump station construction phase of the project. Staff also recommends authorizing an additional $25,000 to be allocated to the tasks performed by Staff on this contract. (See attached Budget Information Table). The contract is behind schedule, believed to be caused by the Contractor. Liquidated Damages are being withheld to cover the added staff costs. BP:Ih c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager H:1WP.DTATNGTNGt11-17-1 WT-Jl1LY.WPD T BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements Contract No. 11-17-1 TASK BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED % (ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETETODATE BY CORF) TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE FUNDS DESIGN $700,000. $868,626. $0. $868,626, $860,000. 99.0% STAFF $375,000. $375,000. $25,000. $400,000. $375,000. 94.0% CONSTRUCTION $6,984,000. $5,913,419. 1 $92,305. $6,005,724. $5,533,743. 92.1% TOTAL $8,059,000. $7,157,045. $117,305. 1 $7,274,350. $6,768,743. 93.0% H:1WRDTAIENGIENG111-17-1AIT IULYWPD CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements Contract No. 11-17-1 Item Approval Date Contract Cost Contract Cost Percentage Increase Authorized Time Authorized Time to to Date Date Orig. 10-11-93 $5,626,370.00 $5,626,370.00 0% 500 Days 500 Days Contract C.O. #1 11-10-93 (27,625.00) 5,598,745.00 (4.9%) 0 Days 500 Days C.O. #2 9-14-94 20,986.00 5,619,733.00 (1.2%) 14 Days 514 Days C.O. #3 8-23-95 197,534.00 5,817,267.00 3.4% 95 Days 609 Days C.O. #4 8-23-95 42,625.70 5,856,425.70 4.1% 0 Days 609 Days C.O. #5 3-27-95 56,993.33 5,913,419.04 5.2% 8 Days 617 Days C.O. #6 Proposed 92,305.00 6,005,724.03 6.7% 101 Days 718 Days HIM.DTATMENG\71-17.1 WIT-NLYAM y Page 1 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros..dba Colich 8 Sons C.O.No.: Six (6) Date: July 23 1997 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage Improvements Contract No. 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order(Add)(Dedocl) $92. 005.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation ,the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - REPLACEMENT OF 6-INCH AND 12-INCH ACP WATERLINES Construction of the subgrade inlet box required relocation of a City of Huntington Beach 12-inch ACP water line to avoid a clearance conflict with the Contractors shoring system. The relocation effort involved relocation of approximately 65-feet of pipe,installation of a 12-inch valve east of the new Pump Station for isolation purposes and installation of three plugs and thrust blocks. After the construction of the inlet box was completed,the City of Huntington Beach's water division directed the District to make permanent repairs to the subject waterline (requirement imposed by the State Health Department). These repairs consisted of the following elements: 1) approximately 126 LF of the TRFLEX DIP pipe (reinstalled in the same trench location,including filings and couplings, 2)Installation of 6-inch C900 PVC pipe from the 124nch tee at Slater Avenue and Flower Street to an existing valve on the 64nch waterline in Flower Street(approximately 60-feet), 3) Remove an additional 54-feet of 12-inch transit pipe(ACP)to comply with limits of replacement as directed by City's Water Department,4) Installed new 6-inch gate valve and tapping saddle,5) Installed concrete kickers and removed temporary thrust blocks,6) Installed new 124nch x 64nch x 124nch tee and a 12-inch x 6-inch tapping sleeve,7) Backfilled and slurried the replacement trench lines and replaced street cross section in kind,8)Chlorinated,flushed and pressure tested replaced waterlines,and 9) Removal and Disposal of unsuitable materials from trench lines,The District staff agrees that this change order Rem is a changed condition. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $36,298.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days ITEM 2-INSTALLATION OF VENT LINE FROM MANHOLE NO. 12 Early in the project.the Contractor installed Manhole No. 12 and the 42-inch gravity sewer into Manhole No. 12. The Contractor also installed a bored and jacket casing from Manhole No. 12 to the Pump Station influent box to allow installation of 42-inch piping at a later date. Work on the Pump Station influent box did not start until several months later. In that time period,Manhole No. 12 apparently settled due to unstable peat soil conditions common in that area. This settlement resulted in a reverse slope for the 42anch gravity sewer between Manhole No. 12 and the Pump Station influent box. These calculations indicated the possibility of a hydraulic jump that could result in the release of odors. Plan Change No. 11 was prepared and the Contractor was directed to install an fl- inch PVC vent line from Manhole No. 12 to a tie-in point at the wetwell ceiling (connected to an existing 8-inch DIP foul air scrubber line). This foul air scrubber line will be connected to a future granular activated carbon based biofilter. The scope of this change order hem consists of the following elements: Page 2 of ;) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY '4 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros..dba Colich &Sons C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: July 23, 1997 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Stafion Sewage Improvements Contract No 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carole Engineers ITEM 2-CONTINUED 1) Installation of approximately 70-feet of 8-inch PVC pipe including all fillings,couplings,flanges,etc.,2)Core drilling at Manhole No. 12 and at wetwell wall (with two link seals), 3)Installation of stainless steel pipe support,4) Welded T-lock around ventline and spark tested T-lock at wall penetration point, 5) Construction and removal of scaffolding inside the wetwell to prepare for vent line wall penetration, and 6)Traffic control set-up and replacement of permanent street asphalt in kind. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 106(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,656.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days ITEM 3-STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS TO CATWALK SUPPORTS The Contractor was directed to structurally modify the upper walkway at plan elevation.8.88 feet to avoid a clearance conflict with Pump No.3 drive shaft(Reference Plan Change No.6). The structural modifications included the following: 1)Field cut and relocate a C 12 x 12.10 stringer, approximately 12 inches to the east, 2) Install a new C12 channel to match existing, 3)Add a diagonal knee brace (IL 64nch x 64nch x 5/8-inch aluminum)from the C12 stringer and tie Into the south concrete wall via bolted connection(SST bolts and 5/8-inch aluminum plate). This item or work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B(2(b)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,564.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4--CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH STREET RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS In response to a request by the City of Huntington Beach,the Contractor was directed to complete a list of street work on Slater Avenue located adjacent to the old and new lift station. The major items of extra work are as follows: removal and replacement of a concrete cross gutter and curb and gutter at the northwest corner of Slater Avenue and Flower Street; cold planning approximately 13,000 square feet on Slater Avenue between an area identified as approximately 50 feet west of the old lift station and 30 feet east of new station;installed an asphalt concrete leveling course,and final capping wear course(approximately 92 tons),etc. These items were in addition to the scope Identified as City of Huntington Beach street improvement bid Rams 30 to 33 in the contract documents. This work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 106(8)2(b) of the General Provision. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $16,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 7 Calendar Days Page 3 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros..dba Colich&Sons C.O. No.: Six (fi) Date: July 23, 1997 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewaae Improvements, Contract No 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 5 - DAMAGE DUE TO DEWATERING SYSTEM SHUTDOWN AND HEAVY RAINS During the peak rainstorm period the City of Huntington Beach directed the District to stop pumping dewatering effluent into the Central Park storm drain system. The Contractor had no alternative, but to pump water back into the excavation site until heavy rains subsided. As a result,the Contractor incurred added expenses,consisting of clean-up costs, removal of mud from the forms and footings, resetting of wall form panels that bowed;some shoring needed to be replated; ground stabilization and slurry backfill to secure the excavation area; resetting traffic control in front of the station; miscellaneous emergency work to repair Slater Avenue street section adjacent to excavated area,etc. This Rem of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provision. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $11,689.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days ITEM 5-MANUAL BYPASS SWITCH FOR THE UPS SYSTEM The Contractor was directed to install a manual bypass switch for the uninterruptible power system(UPS)to improve system reliability and provide the flexibility for changing out the UPS(take-off line) for servicing,The following design changes were required (Ref.Plan Change No. 12): 1) Replace an existing single-pole 30A circuit breaker with double-pole 15A;2)Install wall mounted maintenance bypass switch;3) Provide termination for 120240V at the SPC control panel;and 4)Run Input and output conduit for the UPS in a separate conduit. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,457.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day ITE 177- RESTORING TWO EASTBOUND AND TWO WESTBOUND TRAFFIC LANES The Contractor was directed to change approved temporary traffic control striping in front of the new and existing pump station on Slater Avenue for public safety reasons. This phase of the project called for two west bound lanes and one eastbound lane. Traffic control was reset to reflect the City's original street plan,which is two eastbound and two westbound lanes. The incurred extra costs were primarily for sandblasting the temporary striping in-place, prep work for the new striping, movement of equipment and materials,etc. This Rem of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,800.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Days Page 4 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O.BOX$127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros-dba Colich&Sons C.O.No.: sir (a) Date: July 211997 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage Improvements.Contract No 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 8 -TEMPORARY STANDBY GENERATOR The relocation of the existing trailer mounted standby generator to the new electrical building, required itto be converted from non-after-cooled engine to an after-cooled engine in order to comply with current AQMD permit requirements. To make the above conversion,the existing generator had to be towed to Valley Detroit Diesel Allison's Manufacturing facility. Valley Detroit Diesel required approximately five working days plus two additional days for preventative maintenance work to be performed (requested by the District's Maintenance staff). The additional cost for this change order Rem was the rental cost incurred by the Contractor to fumish,install and connect a potable standby generator to the existing pump stations automatic transfer switch during the conversion period. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(0)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,273.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day ITEM 9-CHANGE IN TIE-IN OF 8-INCH CITY SEWER FROM MANHOLE#24 TO MANHOLE#12 The design detail called for an 8-inch VCP sewer line to be installed between an existing City manhole at Flower Street and Slater Avenue and a new 48-Inch manhole to be built(Manhole#24). Prior to construction of Manhole #24,R was determined that there was a direct conflict with a recently installed fiber optics cable TV conduit. To avoid this conflict,Manhole#24 was eliminated and the 8-inch City line was tied into a new 844nch manhole(#12). To make this change,the Contractor had to add approximately 27.5-feet of 8-inch VCP pipe and remodel existing Manhole#12's base. This work was accomplished pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $855.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Day ITEM 10-REPAIR OF CITY 8-INCH VCP SEWER LINE During construction of the Districts new 36-inch forcemain at Station No. 16+ 17,the Constructor observed that two joints were leaking (cracked bells)on the City's 8-inch VCP line. The Contractor was directed to replace approximately 25-feet of this line to ensure its integrity for the City of Huntington Beach. This work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $553.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days a Page 5 of 7 p COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 EWS AVENUE,P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros..dba Colich&Sons C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: July 23. 1997 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage Improvements Contract No. 11-17-1 Consultant: John Cargllo Engineers ITEM 11 -ADDITIONAL PIPE SUPPORT IN SUMP PUMP WELL The Contractor was directed to add a pipe support at the sump pump well to provide more rigidity for the lower discharge header. Structural loads were concentrated at this point where the lower discharge header turns vertically to the upper discharge header. Within the sump pump well the Contractor doweled holes into the concrete slab and sides,added additional rebar, and poured a concrete pier, approximately 10"x 10"x 4'6". This work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $160.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 12 -REGRADING OF DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK AREA IN FRONT OF NEW STATION After the Contractor finished his grading in front of the new station in preparation for the concrete pour, he was directed to modify the grades to include a grade break(approbmate area of 2,000 square feet) . The contract documents indicated a straight grade from pump station building to rolled curb,but due to street settlement the curb grades had to be adjusted. This work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 13-TIME EXTENSIONS Pursuant to contract documents,the Contractor is entitled to be granted time extensions to the contract for excusable delays including inclement weather as defined in section seven of the construction agreement. The Contractor to date has accumulated 72 days due to inclement weather(Pump Station, Phase 1 scope). There were 20 days of inclement weather built into the original contract(Reference Section 50-8(A)of the special provisions). Twelve out of the above twenty days have been deducted out in Change Order No. 3(street phase). Therefore the net effect will be a 64 calendar day time extension. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 64 Calendar Days ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $92,305-00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 101 Calendar Days Page 6 of 7 ,) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V 108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros.,Me Colich 8 Sons C.O.No.: Six (6) Date: JUw 23. 1997 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage Improvements.Contract No. 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 101 calendar days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order,but that no direct or indirect,incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be Incurred by Contractor,except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: October 11, 1993 Original Contract Time: 500 Calendar Days Original Completion Date:' February 22,1995 Time Extension this C.O.: 101 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 218 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 718 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: - Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Contractor was allowed a delay start date to January 3, 1994 as noted in previous change orders. Original Contract Price $5,626,370.00 Prev.Authorized Changes $ 287,049.03 This Change (Add)(Bedeet) $ 92,305.00 Amended Contract Price $ 6 005 724.03 g Page 7 of 7 ( COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE,P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros..dba Colich&Sons C.O. No.: Six (6) Date: July 23. 1997 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Saw ne Improvements Contract No 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: July 23, 1997 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA id By: q Rec�mended by: Engineeringyanager Da a nstruclion Manager Date pprov d Appr ved as to Form: /_ G- 7qJ cca 7 7.-4 i ctor of Engineering Date neral Cou el 0 Dale Accepted by: C�OLICH BROS., INC. dba COLICH &SONS U -� G�L �.-2S-on Contractor Date Bd s� a w AGENDA ❑ Cam e COMA.I,CTION TION ITEM ITEM ❑ Y ❑ JT.BDS.CONSENT o JT.BDs OZ�S TRANSMITTAL trvoNzoNBENry ❑ PLauCn nR:NG 7dCy7JT.BCSMe—ETW OHTE 9 JT.BDS.AGENDA REM NO. MEETING DATE 'COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO, CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS ON1TS (Onginator) PDC'. 713/97 PLC FAHR. FANR All Dept.3790. David Erdkamp,6304 EXEC. EXEC STEER. STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDs:723/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO JOB NOS.P1-41, P143,P144,P248, P2-50,P2-53-2,SP19950021 AND SPI9950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3,4,AND 5 AT PLANT NO.1; SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NONSTRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 1;SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO.1; REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS D THROUGH O AT PLANT NO.2;SEISMIC RETROFIT OF NON- STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO.2;SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO.2;TUNNEL COVER REPLACEMENT AT BILLINGS TUNNEL AT PLANT NO.2;AND SLUDGE PIPING MODIFICATION AT PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS 6-15:The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 1 proving eleven items of added and deleted work and granting a time extension of 37 days for completion of the added work. Recommended Action(s): 1.Approve Change Order No. 1 to Job No.P141,at al.with Margate Construction,for a deduction of$85.680.00 decreasing the total contract amount to$8,375,458.00,and an addition of 37 calendar days time extension. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on July 1996 Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination filed on_ Y CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES T.,Mo.P1. Tnwenl TOTAL BUDGETED AMr.:$15,180.000. $3,870,000 $3,088,000 $782,000 $3,870,000 SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS SCNMuIVLine Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SCNetluMJLine Hem: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Yenm Budget: $15,180,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15,180,000.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED An AMOUNT $8,461,138.00 $0.00 ($85,680.00) $8,375,458.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNELT NO REQUIRES HOARD POLICY ACTION? NO II YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section RemN OYIYd] WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO r If YES,a plain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(List): W —/) 1. Budget Information Table Originator Date 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order No. 1 CO RRENCES: a- 'fZ 6 -�.-T) Sid W Date n M go De ' I J G ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) p j 1. Budget Information bible Signa Date 2. Change Order Status Report De It tI d(O igne 3. Signed Change Order No. 1 I / skiRiature Date Assstant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) Job No. P1-41, Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P2-48, Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, consists of replacement of deteriorated access bridges and other steel framing with new fiberglass components, replacement of sweep motors and automation of the instrumentation and control systems for the clarifiers. The plans and specifications for Job Nos. P1-41 and P2-48 were prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation. Job No. P1-43, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. t and Job. P2-50, Seismic Retrofit of Non- Structural Systems at Plant No. 2, consists of seismic anchorage of electrical, mechanical and process Control equipment throughout both plants and replacement of deteriorated pipe supports in existing tunnels. The plans and specifications for Job Nos. Pl-43 and P2-50 were prepared by John Carollo Engineers. Job No.P1-44, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1 and Job No. P2-48, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, consists of upgrading the structural connections and foundation anchorage in twenty-four existing buildings throughout both plants. The plans and specifications for Job Nos. Pl-44 and P2-53-2 were prepared by Holmes and Narver. SP19950021, Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2 and SP19950059, Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 at Plant No. 1 are small projects designed by Districts' staff. The construction Contract was awarded to Margate Construction, Inc. In July, 1996. The contract is approximately 37% Complete. Change Order No. 1 is a deduction in the amount of($85,680.00) for eight items of additional work and two credit items. There is a 37 day time extension associated with this change order. The following is a summary of the contract: Original Contract Price: $8,461,138.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (85,680.00) Change Order to Date $ (85,680.00) Percent Decrease (0.94)% Amended Contract Price $8,375.458.00 The following summarizes the Change Order. For additional details on individual items, see the attached Change Order. n..em o601"R Page 2 of 5 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE 1 Modification of shear walls at Purchasing $19,430.00 0 Omission Building supply room. 2 Valve access platform at Distribution Box B at $ 7,965.00 0 Design Change Plant No. 2 3 Primary sludge pumps in Basins F & G pump $(3,819.00) 0 Changed Condition room at Plant No. 2 4 Primary Basins gear drive motors at Plant Nos. $ 9,515.00 0 Changed Condition 1 &2 5 Deletion of work at Distribution Boxes P-1 & C $(140,103.00) 0 Design Change 6 Shims required at hold-downs to align sub- $4,075.00 0 Changed Condition puriins 7 Relocate two, 2-inch diameter sodium $ 1,500.00 0 Changed Condition hypochlorite PVC chemical lines 8 Add receptacles,-telephone and computer $8,074.00 0 Design Change and outlets in warehouse. Remove and replace Omission surface mounted wiring not shown on plans 9 Replacement of termite damaged wood in shop $ 5,324.00 0 Changed Condition building complex at Plant No. 1 10 Tie-downs at Turbine building at Plant No. 2 $2,359.00 0 Design Change 11 Time Extension due to inclement weather and $0.00 37 Other District delays TOTAL-Change Order No. 1 $(85,680.00) 37 All of the above items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the design phase. Liquidated damages on this contract is $500.00 per day and there are no bonus provisions. DE:lh c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager w.a.a ov�w> Page 3 of 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3,4,and 5 at Plant No. 1,'etc. Job No. P141, at al TASK BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED% (ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE COMPLETE TO DATE BY CORP) TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE FUNDS DESIGN $3,704,075, $2,959,418. $2,959,418. $2,959,418. 100% STAFF $2,800,000. $2,618,706. $2,618,706. $1.718,442. 66% CONSTRUCTION $11,316,425. $8,461,138. ($85,680.) $8,375,458. $3.325,057. 40% TOTAL $17,820,600. $14,039,262. ($85,680.) $13,953,582. $8,002,917. 57% H:\WP.DTAIENGIENGT1411AIT- 0.1 4 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3, 4, AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1, ETC. JOB NO. P1-41, ET AL Item Approval Contract Contract Percentage Auth. Auth. Date Cost Cost to Date Inc. To Date Time Time to Date Orig. 7-22-96 $8,461,138. $8,461,138. 0% 720 720 Contract Days Days C.O. #1 Proposed $(85,680.) $8,375,458. (0.94%) 37 757 Days Days Re sAWWWWA1ENWENGTI-41 WT-COA 5 ,� - v Page 1 of B COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mareate Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: July 23, 1997 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-41: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No 1 Job No P1-43' Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No. P144: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant No 2 Job No. P248: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP19950021: and Sludge Pioino Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 SP19950059 Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Deduct) $(85 680,00) In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. PI- 4 ITEM 1 - MODIFICATION OF SHEAR WALLS AT PURCHASING BUILDING SUPPLY ROOM This item is for modification of two shear walls in the Purchasing Supply Room. One wall was modified to include a doorway between Purchasing and the Warehouse Supply Room. The second wall was to modify the Supply Room wall with pass-through windows at the counter that is used to issue warehouse supplies. These modifications were required to allow for proper access and improved serviceability of the Purchasing Building. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. Reference: Plan Change Order No. 2A. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 19,430.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Job No. 132-48 ITEM 2 -VALVE ACCESS PLATFORM AT DISTRIBUTION BOX"B"AT PLANT NO. 2 This item provides an access platform for a valve located on the top of Distribution Box'B'that was not shown on the contract drawings. The work involved a new structural aluminum platform, fiberglass grating and anodized aluminum handrails. This work will eliminate a potential safety hazard when operating the valve. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (b) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. Reference: Plan Change Order No. 3. COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,965.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days y Page 2 of 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: July 23, 1997 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-41 7 Seismic Retrofit of Nonstructural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P11-43: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No 1. Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No 2 Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No 2. Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No 2. SP19950021: and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 SP19950059 Job No. 1132-48 ITEM 3- BASINS F &G PUMP ROOM This item includes the deletion of a scum pump and the required piping modifications necessary to install new pumps as specified in the pump room for Basins F and G. The center scum pump had recently been replaced by Districts staff and did not required replacement as shown on contract drawings. The installation of two new pumps in this area required modifications to existing piping which was not shown on the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: Plan Change Order No. 4). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(3,819.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Job No. P1-41 and P2-48 ITEM 4- PRIMARY BASINS GEAR DRIVE MOTOR MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NOS. 1 &2 The specifications for rehabilitation of the primary basins required that each of the drive motors be replaced on the seventeen primary basins. During the design phase the existing motors in the basins were not able to be accessed by the designer due to the area being classified as a confined space. The assumption was made that the motors were typical. Upon actual inspection by the Contractor it was found that the motors were not typical and differed in configuration. These modifications were required to match the existing conditions and were not shown on the contract drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (B) (2) (a) of the General Provisions. Reference: Plan Change Order No. 5). COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,515.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days (P1-41 = 18% / P248= 82%) v Page 3 of 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mamale Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: Julv 23. 1997 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P7-41, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No, 2. Job No P2-50, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No 2 Job No P2-53-2, Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No 2 SP19950021 and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 SP19950059 Job No. P141 and P248 ITEM 5- DELETION OF WORK AT DISTRIBUTION BOXES P-1 AND C This item deletes the work on Distribution Box P-1 at Plant No. 1 and Distribution Box C at Plant No. 2 for the following reasons; the Distribution Box at Plant No. 1 accepts flows from the waste sidestream pump station and also supplies water to the trickling filters. It was not feasible to take the box out of service for thirty days to perform contract work as specified in the specifications. The proposed work at Distribution Box C at Plant No. 2 did not address the draw-of of foul air and the required protection of exposed concrete within the box under the new covers from the gases. It was not feasible to schedule a shutdown of this facility at this time. Staff determined that it would be in the District's best interests to delete the referenced work from this contract and investigate including this work in a future contract where the intricate scheduling of active facilities would be accomplished. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (B) 2 (a) of the General Provisions. (Reference Plant Change#7). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ( P141 = 60.6% I P248 = 39.4% ) $(140,103.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Job No. P144 ITEM 6 - SHIMS REQUIRED AT HOLD-DOWNS TO ALIGN SUB-PURLINS This item required plywood shims to be added to the wood roof sub-purins sides to line up with the 4'x 14" roof purlins. These were added to the Purchasing, Fleet Services and Buildings"A"and"B". The as-built conditions differed from what was shown on the contract drawings. One hundred and sixty- three shims were required. The prices agreed upon is $25.00 each. This item of work should have been included in the seismic retrofit of buildings at Plant No. 1, but was not shown on the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (b)2 (a) of the General Provisions. (Reference Field Change Order#1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,075.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Maraate Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: July 23, 1997 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P141: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P143: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2.48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No 2 Job No. P2-53-2: Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No 2 SP19950021: and Sludoe Pioinu Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6.15 SP19950059 Job No. Pl-43 ITEM 7- CHEMICAL LINE RELOCATION This item will relocate two PVC chemical lines that interfere with the installation of seismic pipe bracing in Tunnel No. 10 at Plant No. 1. Three-hundred feet of polyvinyl chloride pipe was installed in a different Iocabon on the pipe rack to allow seismic bracing to be attached to larger pipes as proposed. Installing this new piping allowed the existing lines to remain in service and prevented scheduling an expensive shut-down of the plant operations. This item was negotiated in accordance with the General Provisions, Section 10-6 (B) 2 (a). (Reference: Field Change Order No. 8.) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Job No. Ptd4 ITEM 8- ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS AT WAREHOUSE- PLANT NO. 1 This item includes three separate portions of work. The first portion is to install new electrical, telephone and computer outlets in a new seismic shear wall. Along this wall is a new equipment and supply check-out counter. The Districts'future new computer network will track inventory of all material stored in the warehouse. This future installation will require additional outlets. There is a cost saving in installing new circuits, wiring and conduits at this point in the contract. The second portion required removal and replacing surface mounted electrical conduits and receptacles in the Mechanical Shop and not shown on the contract plans. The third portion of this item required removal and replacing surface-mounted conduit and wire, wiring of lighting and roll-up doors in the warehouse. The above items of work were negotiated in accordance with the General Provisions. Section 10-6 (B) 2 (a). (Reference Field Change Orders 11, 3, and 2.) ADDED COST THE ABOVE CHANGE ORDER ITEMS: $ 8,074.00 TIME EXTENSION THE ABOVE CHANGE ORDER ITEMS: 0 Calendar Days Y Page 5 of 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction C.O. No.: One f11 Date: July 23, 1997 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1.41: Seismic Retrofit of Nan-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. Pt-43: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D throuoh O at Plant No 2 Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2.50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No 2. Job No. P2-53.2: Tunnel Cover Reolacement at Billinas Tunnel at Plant No 2 SP19950021: and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6.15. SP19950059 Job No. P1-44 ITEM 9 - REPLACEMENT OF TERMITE DAMAGED WOOD IN SHOP BUILDING COMPLEX AT PLANT NO. 1 This item replaces termite-damaged wood found in several of the westerly shop buildings at Plant No. 1. The damage was found behind the plastered walls which were subsequently removed to allow for structural seismic retrofit. The damaged sills and studs were removed and replaced with sound wood. This required replacing the plastered dry walls and painting on both sides of the damaged walls. Termite damaged fascia boards were also replaced and painted to match existing buildings. The foregoing work was not foreseen and was necessary in order to proceed with the seismic revamping. This item was negotiated in accordance with the General Provisions, Section 10-6 (B)2 (a). (Reference Field Change Order#4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,324.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Job No. P253-2 ITEM 10-TIE-DOWNS AT TURBINE BUILDING, PLANT NO. 2 This item installed tie-down angles between the walls and Floor for seismic shear wall ties. Along the southerly-side of the Turbine Building there is a raised steel deck floor with electrical control equipment mounted on top with power and control cables underneath this flooring. The Districts Operations and Maintenance Department determined that it was almost impossible to safely disconnect the power to this building since it provides emergency stand-by power to Districts critical facilities in case of an emergency. Therefore, the Contractor could not work on top of these live wires to do the proposed work and was directed to fabricate new tie-down plates and to install the plates on the south side of the Turbine Building. This item was negotiated in accordance with the General Provisions, Section 10-6 (B) 2 (a). (Reference Field Change Order#19) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,359.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 4 Page 6 of 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Mamate Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: July 23. 1997 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3. 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-41: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No 1. Job No. P1-44' Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D throunh Q at Plant No 2. Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No P2-50: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2.Job No. P2-53.2:Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. 81319950021: and Sludae Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15. SP19950059 ITEM 11 -TIME EXTENSION In accordance with Section 50-8 of the contract specifications, time extensions for inclement weather will be granted when contract work could not be accomplished. The first portion of this item grants a 16 day time extension for inclement weather between the dates of October 30, 1996 and January 24, 1997. The second portion of this time extension is for delays to the Contractor caused by maintenance issues within the Primary Claimer Basins. Upon completion of Basins P and Q, Districts staff determined that it would be cost effective to perform some routine maintenance work on equipment within the basin. This maintenance work delayed the preparation of the next pair of Basins (D and E) for contract work to be performed. Also when Basin E was being prepared and drained by Districts staff for the Contract it was found that the basin drain was plugged. This delayed the contract work from being started on the basin. The inclement weather delay totaled 16 days. The routine maintenance work delayed the contract by 14 days and the plugged drain delay equated to 7 days, ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 37 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(85,680.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 37 Calendar Days r Page 7 of 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Margate Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: July 23, 1997 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-41, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No, Pl-44: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D throuah O at Plant No 2. Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No P2-50' Seismic Retrofit at Plant No 2 Job No P2-53-2, Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billings Tunnel at Plant No. 2. SP19950021: and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 SP19950059 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 37 calendar days extension of time is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME - Original Contract Date: July 22. 1996 Original Contract Time: 720 Days Original Completion Date: July 18, 1998 Time Extension this C.O.: 37 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 37 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 757 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 28, 1998 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Onginal Contract Price S 8,461,138.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $,( 85.680,001 Amended Contract Price $8,375,458.00 Page 8 of 8 ` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Marcate Construction C.O. No.: One(1) Date: July 23, 1997 Job: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1. Job No 131-41, Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-43: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1. Job No. P144: Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-48: Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Plant No. 2. Job No P2-50- Seismic Retrofit at Plant No 2 Job No P2-53-2, Tunnel Cover Replacement at Billinas Tunnel at Plant Ng. 2. SP199500217 and Sludge Piping Modification at Primary Sedimentation Basins 6-15 SP19950059 Board Authorization Date: July 23, 1997 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Reviewed by: Sub mi d by: Engineering Imager Date Co traction Manager Date Ap 6ove&k. Ap oved sto Form: �// Director of Engineering Dat Gener I 'ounsel ate Accepted by MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. C rector Date AGENDA - � ❑ COhTA.WFO.REM ❑ caM Ac loNl vn ITEM ❑ JT.805.CONSENT N ❑ JT N� D�US IO" TRANSMITTAL ❑ URIC HEARING 73 97JT.eos £ETING.DA E � /3. e1 JT.eOS.AGENO ITEMNO. MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMITS: OMITS (Originator) PD0:7/3/97 PDC '/ FAHR: FAHR All 3730,J.Herberp,X5086 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,aM Ebensbn JT.BDS:723/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): eaenda Wordina: ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE (CDM) FOR JOB NOS. J-40-1 AND J-40-2 RE PREPARATION OF PHASE 1 OF STRATEGIC PLAN (ALL DISTRICTS):The Director of Engineering requests approval of an Addendum to the PSA providing for additional work in three areas: (1) updating trunk sewer system information contained in the Districts' CASSWORKS data base, (2) development of pump station discharge curves, and (3) additional public, staff, and Board meeting support. Recommended Action(s): 1. Approve Addendum No. 3 to the PSA with CDM in the amount of$199,489 for a total amount not to exceed $1,958,717. CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of Exemption FNed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination glad on_ CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR.TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9m16. pus Tmmenl TOTAL BUDGETED AMY.:$500,000 (FY 97.98) SOURCE:CORF $500,000 $0 $500,000 $500,000 sclrt ulabne Karns:D.I.b S D.I.c AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SchedulelLlne s m- TOTALPROJECTBUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGETCHANOE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AFT PROJECT BUDGET First Year In Budget:: $2,118,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,118,0o0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,P0, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AR AMOUNT $1,395,640.00 $363,615.00 $199,489.00 $1,958,744.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE If YES,state number _Parmanet Unsw Term If YES,expain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Rwie°04n.7 Page 1 of 3 ✓Is" 6 2 S 7 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Llag: r 1.CDM proposal letter dated June 11.1997. Originator Date 2. ......us report. table_ 3. PSA status report. CON NICE 4. Summary of Meetings for Strategic Plan. G 2(0% S" nature Date vision a g O esi e �e_5,77 ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) 1.CDM proposal letter dated June 11,1997. Signalur Date 2. Summary of Meetings for Strategic Plan. Depa n a ( e gn (�-Z6-Y 1- Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) The proposed Addendum No. 3 involves work in three areas: (1) updating trunk sewer system information contained in the Districts' CASSWORKS data base, (2) development of pump station discharge curves, and (3) additional public, staff, and Board meeting support. UDdatino CASSWORKS Data Base The scope of work for J-40-1, Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge includes development of a computer model of the Districts' collection system that will identify areas of the collection system that do not have sufficient capacity for current or future peak Bows. This model will allow the Districts to set priorities for capital projects in the collection system, so that capital expenditures are optimized. The model will be updated in future years as new development occurs in the Districts service area, and as new collection system projects are undertaken. The model requires accurate physical data about the collection system such as the diameter, length and elevation of pipes, and diversion structure dimensions and positions. When complete, the model will contain over 5,000 individual pieces of data on the collection system. The original scope of work and CDM's proposal stated that this data would be obtained from the Districts' CASSWORKS computer data base. The CASSWORKS data base was originally developed as a maintenance inventory and management tool containing 10,000 individual pieces of data. Development of the model is nearly complete. During development of the model, it was discovered that the CASSWORKS data base did not contain accurate and complete engineering data on portions of the collection system. Staff had CDM proceed with updating the CASSWORKS data base and cross-checking the data, in order to keep the project on schedule. An additional fee of $55,583 is required for this work. Development of Pump Station Curves The Districts have 18 pump stations which were included in the collection system model. Data from pump discharge curves for these stations is required for the model. The original scope of work and CDM's proposal assumed that accurate pump curves were available in the Districts' records. When CDM began analyzing the pump curve data, it was discovered that much of the data was either outdated or inaccurate. CDM submitted a proposal to staff for conducting field tests to develop pump curves at a cost of$63,370. In order to keep the project on schedule and on track, staff authorized CDM to develop theoretical discharge curves based upon equipment data and discharge piping configurations. The fee associated with this additional effort is $15,870. Additional Public Staff and Board Meeting Su000rt As the strategic plan moves forward, an increased level of technical and management analysis, decision making, and intemal and external communication is required beyond what was Originally estimated. The internal communication can be best accomplished through an additional bi-weekly meeting with executive management and CDM. The purpose of this Strategic Plan management meeting (STRAP) is to ensure that the executive management team is deeply involved in the strategic planning process, including the Rate Advisory Committee (RAC) and the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC). In November 1996, Districts staff determined that additional meetings were required to provide adequate communications to the various stakeholders (Board and public). Addendum No.1 addressed these needs by adding four Ad Hoc Committee meetings, two RAC meetings, two PAC meetings and one Board Workshop. At that point, Page 2 of 3 e W Wtael ` however, the role of the Ad Hoc Committee was not known, or the extent of the alternatives that have emerged from the public outreach program. Because the increased activities required in communicating with the Board and public, the following additional work is anticipated: — - Five additional Ad Hoc meetings (four held to date) - Three additional Quarterly Board Workshops (five held to date) -Twenty additional bi-weekly management meetings (STRAP) - One additional RAC meeting plus additional effort for RAC meetings 5 and 6 - One additional PAC meeting Each of these meetings requires significant preparation and follow-up effort. A summary of meetings required for the Strategic Plan is attached. Although this additional work is becoming necessary to keep the Strategic Plan on track, it is not included in the original scope of work. An additional fee of$128,036 is required for this work. Additional Work Items, Addendum No.3 Updating CASSWORKS Database $ 55,583 Development of Pump Station Curves $ 15,870 Additional Meeting Support $128,036 Total, Addendum No. 3 $199.489 In addition, staff is recommending that additional funds be authorized in the amount of$125,000 for staff expenditures to continue the coordination and oversight of the strategic planning effort. JDH:jmf H:\WP.DTA�ENr%3730N ERBERGUITCDM2.WPD - c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Page 3 of 3 CDMCamp Dresser & McKee Inc. X4Jnnh11,ee9tm1 ca OM 1925 Palomar Coke Way,Suite 300eapneenny Carlsbad.California 92008 c4 —t— Te1819438.7755 Fax:819a38-741t ?' ry June11, 1997 Mr David A. Ludwin Director of Engineering County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Subject: Addendum No.3 Job J-40-1: Services for Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge Job J-40-2: Financial Charges and Fee Schedules Dear Mr. Ludwin: During the course of the Strategic Plan Phase I work, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC)and Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. (CDM)have agreed that revisions to the scope of work were appropriate and in the best interests of the projects. To date, two addenda have been authorized to accommodate these changes to the original contract scope of work. Recently,CSDOC requested CDM to provide a proposal to again modify the current scope of work for the projects. These items of out-of-scope work have been discussed with your staff,and we have reached tentative agreement that these changes should be formalized. Therefore,CSDOC has requested CDM to prepare this proposed Addendum No.3 to summarize the additional work. Each component of Addendum No. 3 is discussed below: ■ Updating the CASSWORKS Database To develop the trunk sewer system model,the CASSWORKS database provided by CSDOC was to be used to obtain the physical configuration of the system,including pipe diameters,lengths and slopes. CDM assumed that the database was accurate, and the CDM budget was based on working with CASSWORKS to develop connectivity relationships between contracts. However,CDM has encountered a variety of additional, unbudgeted problems in conjunction with the CASSWORKS information that has required attention in order to complete the model development. These problems include: - Over 100 pipe lengths and 150 invert elevations were missing; - Approximately 200 data entries were incorrectly entered into the system; - Benchmarks varied between contracts(no consistent benchmark system); - The approximately 100 diversion structures were not consistently noted,and diversion structures settings were not in the database; and - Data for at least seven recent sewer contracts had not been entered. CDM Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. Mr. David A.Ludwin May 16, 1997 Page 2 As a result of these deficiencies,CDM has incurred a substantially greater amount of time in researching,cross-checking and entering information than had been originally planned. Without the cooperation from CSDOC Engineering Department and Collection Facilities Division staff in tracking down contract drawings for cross- referencing purposes, this effort needed to address the CASSWORKS database inadequacies would have been even greater. ■ Development of Pump Station Discharge Curves CSDOC operates pumping stations throughout the entire wastewater collection system. The CDM budget assumed that accurate information on these facilities was available from CSDOC files. While CSDOC provided information packages for thirteen(13)of the facilities,this information did not match data presented in the 1989 Master Plan. Following discussions with CSDOC staff, it was recognized that additional work would be required to provide correct information and obtain missing data,and CDM prepared a proposal to conduct field tests of the existing pumping equipment at eighteen(18)active stations. Ultimately,CSDOC decided to take this work forward separately. To date,no updated information has been received. Because of the need to include realistic station discharge information into the collection system model,CDM has had to develop a set of theoretical discharge curves. The effort to research drawings,develop discharge piping configurations, and create discharge curves was not in the original scope of work. ■ Additional Public,Staff and Board Meeting Support As the strategic planning process evolves, both the Districts and CDM have discovered that the process warrants an increased level of technical and management analysis,decision making,and communication,both internally and externally. At this point,it has become apparent that the the internal communication needs can best be met with the addition of bi-weekly meetings with the management team (STRAP). Additional external meetings are also required with the Boards of Directors,Ad Hoc Committee, the Rate Advisory Committee (RAC)and the Planning Advisory Committee(PAC). In October of 1996,both Districts staff and CDM determined that additional meetings would be required to provide adequate communication to the various stakeholders(Board and public). in fact,Amendment No. 1 addressed these anticipated needs by adding four Ad Hoc meetings,two RAC meetings, two PAC meetings and one Board Workshop. However,at that point,we did not know the role that the Ad Hoc Committee would play or the extent of the alternatives that would emerge from the public outreach program. Because of these increased activities,we now anticipate the following additional meeting and work requirements: 'CDM Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. Mr.David A. Ludwin May 16, 1997 Page 3 - Five additional Ad Hoc meetings(four held to date) Three additional Board Workshops(five held to date) - Twenty additional bi-weekly management meetings (STRAP) - One additional RAC meeting plus additional effort for RAC meetings 5 and 6 - One additional PAC meeting Although the extra work efforts are warranted to keep the planning and communications on track,the level of effort will exceed current budget authorization. We have prepared and attached a summary table which quantifies the additional budgets needed to address these issues. Based on the out-of-scope work which has been delineated above, the value of Addendum No.3 is estimated to be$199,489. We believe that the work described in Addendum No.3 adds important value to CSDOC and the strategic planning effort. If you or your staff have any questions regarding the information in this letter,or wish to clarify any of its points,please contact me at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, CAMP D RESSER&�M�cKEE�INC. Kellene M. Bum-Lucht,P.E. Vice President KBLC .1DCS"RQINAISCLTRSIO6I IKBDLLTR cc: Jim Herberg/County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Paul Gustafson/CDM County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Sumnay ufSa.M of Wmk C., P,m is in Addamlmn Na.3 C.Mpomnl Labor Re ulmnents.bnurs Total TMM PWDPD PM QAAX Pral E.j GIs En !Engineer Drafter. WP/Admin Ilnurn SUPS Out Updaling the CASSWORRS Damhme 16 40 240 24 260 IN 'Flll 355.581 Uevela nenl M Pump Simian Curve S 2 26 120 d0 2e 22e SI5.S20 Addilitmal Wed.t S,punl Ad R.Cmnminm IS emml 100 d0 13 M $25.341 Ruard WorkAWm Clot.) 90 29 10 12 IN 321713 Man ement Mmin sIMAM(20 meek ) w 40 120 $20.821 RAC mmaing I l exlm.addilional eRm RAC W 29 29 S13.990 S39.924 PAC mmlin II extol 0 32 40 32 16 1to SIS,1162 [Total Houn 3N 160 d8 200 2/ NO 22S 62 1359 S... 5199,9A9 svH'uNwm:mxmvnu utmxu:.tvnnauaxss PN.i Summary of Meetings for Strategic Plan Meetings Original Scope Addendum No, 1 Addendum No 2 Addendum No. 3', Total Board Quarterly 1 1 — 3 5 PAC 5 2 — 1 8 RAC 5 ' 2 — 1 8 Ad Hoc — 4 — 5 9 Staff 36 — — 20 56 Total 47 9 30 86 i Original Scope Included 10 public workshops which were later dgsignsted as RAC and PAC. HAWF.DTA�NOU1WHW ffEae UNMTRAT.WPO County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 9272MI27 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday, July 9. 1997. 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, Califomia was held on Wednesday, July 9, 1997, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Offices. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: George Brown, Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager John J. Collins, Joint Chair Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay Mike Petennan, Director of Human Resources Barry Denes Gary Streed, Director of Finance Norman Z. Eckenrode Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Thomas R. Saltarelli Chris Dahl, Information Technology Manager Mark Schwing Barbara Collins, Senior Administrative Analyst Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Linda Eisman, Training Manager Lisa Loney, Human Resources Manager Committee Directors Absent : Terri Josway, Safety& Emergency Response Manager Dan Tunnicliff, Safety& Emergency Response Supvr. Mark A. Murphy Steve Kozak, Financial Manager William G. Steiner Mike White, Controller Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary Other Directors Present: Others Present: None Tom Woodruff, General Counsel APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the June 11, 1997 meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. P Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 2 July 9, 1997 •` REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER • General Manager Don McIntyre reported that he sent a fax to the Directors today regarding AS 769- Consolidation of the Districts. He advised that the bill was signed by the Governor today. There will be a meeting of the Executive Committee in September to approve the LAFCO plan. Director Collins noted that the bill is not effective until January. The hearing process for LAFCO will be after January 1, 1998. REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION Assistant General Manager Judy Wilson had no report. REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-OPERATIONS The Assistant General Manager of Operations had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE • Finance Director Gary Streed advised the Committee that the monthly Treasurers Report was distributed prior to the meeting in accordance with policy. Total cash and investments total $390 Million, including deferred compensation, and we are in compliance with all of the Investment Policy guidelines. • Tax apportionments will be started in November. • Since the Agenda was mailed, COP rates have gone down. Interest rates are one half of what they were when the report was mailed. They were 4% at the mailing and are now at 2%. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION The Director of General Services Administration had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS • Communications Director Michelle Tuchman reported that since word has gotten out that AS 769 has been signed, we received phone calls from two reporters from the a ister and one reporter from the Times. The Times reporter spoke to Director Collins and the other two reporters from the Resister have spoken to Judy Wilson. Michelle anticipates there will be articles in the "Metro"sections of either or both of those two newspapers tomorrow. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee w Page 3 July 9, 1997 • Michelle reported that some of her staff has spent the day setting up the Districts' booth at the Orange County Fair which opens on Friday and will run from the 11th through the 27th. She invited those Directors who can find the time to stop by building number 8 at the Fair. She also advised that tickets can be picked up at her office. Metropolitan Water District of Orange County(MWDOC)will be helping staff the booth and has donated an ultra low-flush toilet for the display model. The public will be given information about the low-flush toilet exchange program at the Fair. A 4' x 6'stylized model of all of the Districts' treatment processes has been set up. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 11 -71 1. FAHR97-45: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 1997 (All Districts): The Treasurer's Report was handed out at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of June 1997 and forward to the Joint Boards. 2. FAHR97-46: CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION(COP) REPORT(All Districts): RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this information-only item. 3. FAHR97-47: EMPLOYMENT STATUS REPORT(All Districts): Total head count at the Districts as of June 19, 1997 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this information-only item. 4. FAHR97-48: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCEITREASURER (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration& Human Resources Committee adopt a motion to recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 97-XX. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 p July 9, 1997 5. FAHR97-49: DECLARATION OF DISTRICTS' OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICTS' EXISTING CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE OF, AND IN ANTICIPATION OF, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE INDEBTEDNESS ISSUE (All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee adopt a motion to recommend that the Joints Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 97-XX. 6. FAHR97-50: 1997-98 FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE UPDATE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE DISTRICTS' FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE VENDOR, J.D. EDWARDS, IN THE AMOUNT OF$55,384.87(All Districts) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee accept the 1997-98 financial information software update and software maintenance agreement with the Districts'financial information vendor, J.D. Edwards, in the amount of$55,384.87, and recommend approval by the Joint Boards at the July 30, 1997 meeting. • Director Swan requested that staff include in the COP report a char that shows the aggregates of each of the remarketing agents at the end of the month. They should be pretty close, he noted. This will allow the Committee the opportunity to compare the remarketing agents' performance at the end of the month. MOTION: A motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 1 through 6 under"Consent Calendar." ACTION ITEMS (Nos. 7 -9) 7. FAHR97-51: FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT (All Districts): COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Barbara Collins, Senior Administrative Analyst, GSA, advised that a computer purchase assistance program will allow Districts employees the opportunity to work with a computer at home to enhance their computer literacy and skills and increase their cross- training capabilities. Barbara advised that a recent survey of 450 cities, with responses from 218 of those agencies, showed 40.4% of the respondent cities already have some type of financial assistance programs; 82% offer a program at no interest; 84% have programs with 24-month or more pay-back periods. A survey of cities and special districts within the CSDOC Districts showed 30.4% of the cities have computer purchase assistance programs, 80% of the water districts have programs, with the sanitary sewer districts having none. A survey of sanitation districts in California and Nevada indicated that 18.2% of those districts have programs. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 5 July 9, 1997 In response to Committee questions regarding computer purchases, credit worthiness, priority lists, and loan repayments, staff advised that an employee would need to purchase software, a monitor and a printer to properly function with the computer. Monitors and printers have become relatively inexpensive. Any equipment to be purchased with the loan money must first be approved by Chris Dahl, Information Technology Manager. The loan must be paid through payroll deductions over 24 months. The employee is to make a 10% down payment on computer purchases. If an employee leaves the Districts, the loan must be paid off by deductions from the employee's last paycheck and using accumulated leave, if necessary. The maximum loan amount per employee will be $3,000. If the aggregate maximum loan fund is expended, a waiting list will be established until the fund is replenished through payroll deductions. The Irvine Ranch Water Districts' program will be our model. The program will initially be established on a first come, first serve basis. However, adjustments may be made later, if it is necessary to establish a priority list. During discussion, the Directors agreed such a program would be of enormous benefit to the Districts by enhancing the skills of its employees and creating a more efficient work force. Prior to the final motion, several motions were made and failed. MOTION: A motion was moved, seconded, and approved with 5 ayes and 2 nays to recommend that the Joint Boards establish a computer financial assistance program for Districts' employees with the following terms: • Maximum loan of$3,000 _ • 10%down payment • 24 months repayment period • Interest rate of 5%per year • Aggregate maximum loan fund of$150,000 • Equipment purchased must be compatible with Districts' equipment 8. FAHR97-52: SEWER SERVICE CHARGES- PROPOSITION 218 (All Districts) COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Gary Streed advised that the County Tax Collector collects the Districts' sewer service fees as a separate line item on the property tax bill. Since this is a special assessment, the County has requested that the Districts sign a certificate that indemnities and holds the County harmless to any challenges based upon the provisions of Proposition 218. General Counsel Tom Woodruff informed the Committee that he received a faxed memo yesterday from the County Auditor which was sent to cities, schools and special districts indicating that he has backed off, on the advise of County Counsel, of his original request. The County Auditor does, however, have a smaller certificate which he is asking the Joint Chair to sign indicating that the assessments have been adopted in accordance with law and are legal and valid. Mr. Woodruff advised he is concerned that they are asking the Joint Chair to certify as to a matter of Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 July 9, 1997 law. This is putting the Directors in an impossible position. Mr. Woodruff felt that this request probably will also be withdrawn, since many of the other government agencies will not be supportive of it. MOTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to refer this item to the Steering Committee at their meeting of July 30, 1997. 9. FAHR97-53: AUTHORIZE STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH R. W. BECK TO DEVELOP ASSUMPTIONS AND STRATEGIES TO IMPLEMENT A REPLACEMENT FUND FOR FIXED ASSETS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED$75,000 (All Districts) COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Mr. Screed advised that during the user fee and budget processes, several Directors requested a formal review of the Districts' accumulated funds policies. R. W. Beck is a firm that has experience in this area, they know a lot about Orange County, they know the soil conditions, earthquake faults and political conditions. R. W. Beck recently completed a model for the Irvine Ranch Water District. A firm proposal can be negotiated later this month after they complete a site visit to review records. Mr. Slreed advised that initial discussions indicate the project can be completed by September 1997 at a cost not to exceed $75,000. Director Swan advised that he recommended this firm highly. They are based in Seattle. They did an extensive job for the Irvine Ranch Water District. Its a computer model which allows all kinds of variables to be plotted. Director Eckenrode questioned if equipment replacement would be included in this model and staff indicated it would be. Staff advised annual depreciation is about 3% for assets in the ground. We depreciate, but do not fund the depreciation. This program will clear up misconceptions that the public and media may have regarding the Districts' accumulated fund balances. Judy Wilson announced that the reserves study is being moved to the October FAHR Committee meeting in order to allow time for the study to be completed in September. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with R. W. Beck to develop assumptions and strategies to implement a Replacement Fund for fixed assets for an amount not to exceed $75,000. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 7 July 9, 1997 INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS 10. SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE STATUS REPORT (All Districts) COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Dan Tunnicliff advised that since fiscal year 1995-96, the Safety and Emergency Response Division has been working on three critical programs: 1) The Integrated Emergency Response Program, which includes specific training for emergency response personnel. Dan advised that the Districts have been conducting table top exercises, which are classroom responses to specific emergency scenarios, since February. Functional exercises which are specific activations of components of the IERP are in the planning phase; 2)The Industrial Hygiene Monitoring Program which looks at hazards in the workplace; and 3)The Hazardous Energy Control Procedures Needs Assessment Program which is to ensure that employees are protected from stored energy such as electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic and mechanical energy during maintenance and repair. Dan gave a status report and slide presentation on each of these critical programs. Mike Peterman, Human Resources Director, advised the Committee that the work plan for this fiscal year for the Safety and Emergency Response Division will not only include table top exercises, but requires participation in full-scale exercises, particularly concerning critical incidents, with local emergency response agencies. Terri Josway, Safety & Emergency Response Manager, exhibited the Districts' Emergency Response Plan and advised the Directors that copies are available upon request. CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item specified under'Closed Session" as Item 11(a) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in closed session at 6:20 p.m. At 6:42 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 549057.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 8 t July 9, 1997 MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 10, 1997, at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Submitted by: f I�IJ L9utIA/ l Lahore Crane Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Secretary H:\WP.DTATINMIOCRANEXFAHRXFAHR.9T NLV 7MIN.97 F.,W Sec.Use 0,, AGENDA ❑ COMNI.INFO.ITEM ❑ COMM.ACTION ITEM ITEM 9 ❑ Jr..SDO ❑ Jr.BolDS.DISCUSSION TRANSMITTAL - m m (NONLYJNSENT) ❑DO" 17 O" -OJT.WS RffETINO DATE JI.BDS.AGENDAITENINO. 22 MEETING DATE COMM.to.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMITS: OMTS (Originalor) PDC: POC FAHR:07/09/97 FAH ALL _ 2210,Gary G.Streed,Ex[.2500 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:07/30/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordina: RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 1997 (All Districts) Recommended Action(s): 1. Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of June 1997. - CEQAREVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination filed on CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENT YEAR CURRENTYEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES Fudl Buda•,plus T—si l TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ N/A N/A, N/A N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS Schedulel Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item: TOTAL PROJECTBUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS Art PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: N/A NIA NIA $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Vearaf First Costs'. - THISAITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED An AMOUNT N/A N/A NIA $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION?NOT APPLICABLE If VEs,stale numEer: _Permanent Limited Tarm If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section R~mnwr Pagel oft H:WP.DTATINU21 O\CRANETAHRIFAHR.97LIULWAHR97.45 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(List): Y- 9�rxcv9� 1. Monthly lnve st Reports. Anginal ri Date 2. M IySrensaction Report. •. - V CONCURRENCES: Signature Date Division Manager(O esignea ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) t. Monthly Investment Repous. natut Date 2. Monthly Trareaclion Report. g 4Depe IHea (Or Designee) Signature Date _ Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) Pacific Investment Management Co.(PIMCO),has served as the Districts'professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust as the Districts'thlyd-party custodian,since September 1995. The Districts'Investment Policy,adopted by the Joint Boards,includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the"Liquid Operating Monies"and for the"Long-Term Operating Monies" All of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with. Historical cost and the current market('mark-to-market's values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability aithe estimate dale. The Districts'investments are in compliance with the Districts'adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition,sufficient funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next sbr months. The table below details the book balances of the Districts'funds at month-end. Book Balances Estimated TE Funds/Accounts 2.1une 30,1907 Ylald(%) _. State of Calif.LAIF $ 9,381,490 5.6 Union Bank Checking Amount 163.297 5.1 Union Bank Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,940,000 5.1 Bank of America Checking Account 338.035 4.6 Bank of America Money Market Amount 125.243 4.1 Bank of America Overnight Repurchase Agreement 600.000 4.0 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 17,032,044 5.5 PIMCO-Long-term Pamalio 316,546.704 6.0 District 11 GO Bond Fund 921 4,277 5.5 Debt Service Reserves Q Trustees 33.112.005 6.2 Petty Cash _ 4,400 -- Deferred Compensation - 10,925,746 (.075)-17.7 TOTAL $ g39 .i6d.141 Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios. In addition,a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month of June 1997 is attached,in compliance with SB 109,which became effective on January 1, 1997. The new yield analysis report Is presented again this month as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report,yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings,as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust,the Districts'custodian bank,is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. GGS:Ic s..407 Page 2 of 2 H:1W P.DTAIFIN11210lCRANEIFAHRTAHR.97V ULVIFAHR97.45 MONTHLY REPORT `- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENTMANAGEMENTPROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 30 June 1997) Liquid Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: $17031,247 • MeM�llon0 $17:031,773 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $17,031,247 • Mellon $17,032,044 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.16 Of Index: 0.25 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact aiMoss)of I%Change: $27,404(0.16%) 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 84% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return(%): 1 Month: 0.45 3 Months: 1.42 12 Months: 5.52 Year-to-Date: 2.74 Index Total Rate of Return(0/"): 1 Month: 0.42 ML-IFINANCE02101K0Z4KtUQ0697.APr MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 30 June 1997) Long Term Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: $g33 gg Mepono 1316:165, 24 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $316532,589 • Mellon $316:546,704 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.22 Of Index: 2.30 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)ofI%Change: $7,133,682 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 00/0 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 0.84 3 Months: 2.59 12 Months: 7.45 Year-to-Date: 3.16 Index Total Rate of Return: (%) 1 Month: 0.78 H:I..TJNANCEV1101 0VZ -T0°97.E➢T OCSF07S111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USO 30-JUN-1997 HBll00 % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.81 0.81 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2 394,446.86 2,384,446.86 13.92% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 2:374,706.67 2,374,706.67 13.87% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN IYR 3 440,023.61 3,440 023.61 20.09% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 2:379,429.33 2,379:429.33 13.89% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 2,960,326.67 2,960,326.67 17.29% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 90,188.00 90,188.00 0.53% 0.00 3,382.OS 3.7S __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 13,629,121.9E 13,629,121.9E 79.58% 0.00 3,382.05 0.02 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 3,402,921.88 3,402,6S2.00 19.87% -269.88 195,500.00 S.7S __________________ __________________ ________ ----------------- _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,402.921.88 3,402,652.00 19.87% -269.88 195,500.00 S.75 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 94,359.80 94,3S9.80 O.S5% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 94,3S9.80 94,359.90 O.SS% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 17,126.403.63 17,126,133.75 100.00% -269.88 198,882.05 1.16 Page 1 OCSF07S222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 30-iUN-1997 HB1100 % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURB PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 107,625.25 107 625.25 0.03% 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAYABLES -53,796,290.32 -53,796:290.82 -16.75% 0.00 0.00 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - DOME 9,995,220.00 10,010 038.40 3.12% 14,818.40 595.000.00 5.94 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 45 682,782.96 45,682:782.96 14.22% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 1:040,913.00 1,040,923.00 0.32% 0.00 39,034.24 3.75 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 3,030,250.39 3,045,068.79 0.95% 14,818.40 634,034.24 20.82 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 152,229,241.13 1S2,816 140.00 47.58% 586,898.87 10,S27,500.00 6.89 U.S. AGENCIES 122,226,S13.50 121,883:472.00 37.95% -343,041.50 7,970,040.00 6.S4 BANKING & FINANCE 27,SS3,599.00 27,487,914.00 8.56% -65,685.00 1,848,31S.00 6.72 INDUSTRIAL 11,S07,100.00 11,040,255.00 3.44% -466,845.00 988,S00.00 8.95 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ _______ TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 313,516,453.63 313,227,781.00 97.53% -288.672.63 21,334,3S5.00 6.81 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 4,880,009.19 4,880,009.19 1.52% 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 4,880,009.19 4,890,009.19 1.52% 0.00 0.00 0.00 NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 321,426,713.21 321,152,BSB.98 100.00% -273,854.23 21,968,389.Z4 6.84 Page 1 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 1 OCSF07511102 1997/06/30 RUN DATE 07/57/97 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME U 14.22.37 PAR VALUE TIM AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY 1D SECURITY DESCRIPTION SOCK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 0 CASH EQUIVALENTS 90,188.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 90,188.00 .46 99%95906 PUBLIC Il 90,188.00 .53 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN MG CORP DISC 5.479 .000 P-1 98.%6 2,374,706.67 17.42 313397LG4 HAT 09/04/1997 2,374,706.67 13.94 3,000,000.00 FED FAR" CR BK CONS DISC MS 5.483 .000 P-1 98.678 2,960,326.67 21.72 313313HB1 "AT 09/23/1997 2,960,326.67 17.38 2,800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC CUTS 5.542 .000 P-1 98.156 2,748,380.44 20.16 313589M9 MAT 10/20/1997 2,746,300." 16.14 200,006.00 FLORIDA PNR CORP DISC 5.543 .000 P-1 99.586 199,172.00 1.46 NIZOAU92 07/09/1997 199,172.00 1.17 500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEIIOUR DISC 5.554 .000 P-1 99.387 496,933.33 3.64 26354AUE2 07/14/1997 496,933.53 2.92 2,400,500.00 FEDERAI. HOME LN M CONS DISC 5.558 .000 P-1 99.143 2,379,429.33 17.45 313MSKRQ MAT 01/03/1997 2,379,429.35 13.97 400,000.00 IBM DISC 5.575 .000 P-1 99.553 399,211.67 2.92 44922AU32 07/03/1997 398,211.67 2.M 700,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MG ASSN DISC 5.577 .000 P-1 98.806 691,643.17 5.07 313509JG9 MAT 07/18/1997 691,643.17 4.06 800,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 5.627 .000 P-1 98.994 791,954.44 5.81 63743CUJ0 07/18/1997 791,954.44 4.65 200,000.00 FORD MR CA CO DISC 5.650 .000 P-1 99.113 198,226.67 1.45 MS39TU37 07/03/1997 196,226.67 1.16 300,000.00 EMERSON ELEC DISC 6.151 .000 MR 99.983 299,%6.75 2.20 2910IM16 07/01/1997 299,948.75 1.76 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 8 CASH EQUIVALENTS 5.463 .037 13,629,121.14 100.00 13,629,121.14 80.02 YLUANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE t 2 OCSFOIS11102 1997/06/30 OUR DATE t 07/07/97 ORANGE CTY LIQUID OPERATING RUN TINE t 14.22.37 ------------ PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION ROOK YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 3,400,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 5.340 5.746 AAA 100.078 3,402,921.00 100.00 912821V33 05.7S02 09/30/1997 OD 30/02/95 31402,"2.00 29.90 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.34E 5.746 3t402t921.00 300.00 3,402t632.00 19.90 TOTAL 5.460 .211 17,032,043.02 306.00 17,031,773.14 300.00 YLUAIAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 3 MFO7522202 1997/06/30 RIM DATE 07/07/97 ORANGE CTY-LOO TERN OPERATING RUM TIME , 14.22.37 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY MARKET TOTAL COST/ X TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOO( YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE X TOTAL --------""'---- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ --------- CASH S CASK EQUIVALENTS 1,040,913.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- .000 3.750 100.000 2,040,913.00 1.83 99%95906 PUBLIC II 11040,913.00 .26 1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 5.546 .000 P-1 99.357 1,391.000.33 2.45 07815JUV6 07/29/1991 1,391,000.33 .SO 1,700,000.00 OU PONT BE MEMO R DISC 5.554 .000 P-1 99.387 1,689,573.33 2.97 26354AUE2 07/14/1997 1,689,573.33 .46 4,300,000.00 AMERICAN ER CR CP DISC 5.564 .000 P-1 99.386 4.273,578.89 7.53 OMIMN84 07/08/1997 4,273,578.89 1.16 400,000.00 AMERICAN ER CR CP DISC 5.570 .000 P-1 19.461 397,045.56 .70 02501RUN1 07/30/1997 397,045.56 .11 5,000,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 5.581 .000 P-1 99.078 4,953,916.67 8.73 026BOJVN8 0B/22/1997 4,953,916.67 1.34 26,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DIST 5.561 .000 P-1 99.078 15,852,533.31. 27.% 63743CVN0 08/22/2997 15,652,533.34 4.28 9,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.596 000 P-1 99.183 9,124,828.33 16.08 - 36959MVF1 08/15/1997 9,124,828.33 2.47 1,500,000.00 FORD MR CR CO DISC 5.662 .000 MR 99.266 1,488,994.17 2.62 34539TU78 07/07/1997 1,488,994.17 .40 6,100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 5.720 .000 MR 90.606 6,014,945.67 10.60 36959M1PO 07/23/1997 6,014,945.67 1.63 20,000,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/D 6.000 5.944 100.100 9,995,220.00 17.64 0663JOKU7 05.950% 06/19/1996 DO 06/19/97 10,010,038.40 2.71 500,000.00 FORD MR CR CO DISC 23.004 .000 P-1 99.113 495,566.67 .87 34539TU37 07/03/1997 495,566.67 .13 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASK EQUIVALENTS 5.415 .541 56,716,915.96 100.00 56,733,734.36 15.35 YLORNAL YIELD ANALYSIS PACE : 4 OCOF07592202 1997/06/30 RUN DATE : 07/07/97 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATES RIM TINE 14.22.37 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT QUALITY HARRET TOTAL COST/ 2. TYPE SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRI►TION BOOK YIELD RATING PRICE NARRET VALUE Z TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 4,000,000.00 FORD MR CR NUN TRANCHE *TR 96 .000 6.307 Al 100.365 3,970,480.00 1.28 345402DZI FLTC/RT 11/09/19" DO 11/08/93 4,014,600.00 1.09 7,100,000.00 FORD ROTOR CR NTN TR 6 00172 .000 5.864 Al 99.937 61999,748.00 2.26 345402HJ3 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 7,095,527.00 1.92 35,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.044 6.774 AAA 101.484 35,593,789.06 11.33 912827R20 06.8752. 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 35,519,400.0E 9.60 33,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.138 6.352 AAA 100.359 33,1%,341.06 10.57 9128272TB 06.37SY. 05/15/2000 DO 05/15/97 33,118,470.00 8.95 39,600,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN OR CONK BUS 6.305 6.528 AAA 99.422 39,890,300.00 12.56 3133915B6 6.490Y. 09/13/2000 DO 09/13/95 39,371,112.00 IS.64 1,000,000.00 SEARS ROEBUCK HTH 0 TR 00491 6.305 7.615 A2 100.984 1,031,860.00 .32 8123SXUJ8 7.690% 0V27/1995 US 02/28/95 1,009,840.00 .27 4,500,000.00 CATERPILLAR FIN. WKS TR00389 6.322 5.806 A2 "99.553 4,466,745.00 1.43 14912LSE2 8.780Y. 07/15/1998 DO 12/15/95 4,479,805.00 1.21 26,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.469 7.489 AAA 103.484 26.793,415.70 8.56 912827S29 07.750Z 11/30/1999 00 11/30/% 26,905,840.00 7.27 18,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.479 7.482 AAA 103.578 19,065,117.19 6.11 912827S45 07.750% 12/31/1999 DO 01/03/95 19,161,930.00 5.18 1,000,000.00 CHRYSLER FINL MN TR 0 00335 6.514 6.250 A3 100.168 993,160.00 .31 17120QPYI 6.260Y. O7/20/1998 OD 02/18/95 1.001,600.00 .27 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.516 6.366 AAA 100.141 4,975,781.25 1.59 912827K49 06.375% 03/31/2001 DO 04/10/96 5,007,050.00 1.35 3,700,000.00 GENERAL MRS ACCEP NTN TR00324 6.532 8.117 A3 103.173 3,911,64G.00 1.21 37042R%M 8.3T52. 02/03/1999 DO 0/03/95 3,617,401.00 1.03 5,000,00D.00 FEDERAL MORE LN BK CONS BUS 6.550 6.541 AAA 100.130 51000,000.00 1.59 3133NDF82 6.5502 05/24/1999 DD 05/23/97 5,006,500.00 1.35 5,0D0,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.553 6.669 AAA 101.219 5,019,140.62 1.61 912827Q47 06.7SOZ. 06/30/29" DO 06/30/94 5,060,950.00 1.37 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE : 5 OCSF07522202 1997/06/30 RUN DATE 07/07/97 ORANGE CTY-LONG TERN OPERATING RUN TIRE 24.22.37 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT QUALITY RABBET TOTAL COST/ 7. TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD RATING PRICE MARKET VALUE 2 TOTAL 8,000,000.00 FEDERAL RAIL "TO ASS" MTN 6.577 6.597 AAA 100.422 810121576.00 2.56 31364CBD9 6.6257. 04/18/2001 DO 04/18/96 8,033,760.00 2.17 2,900,000.00 CHRYSLER FM NTH TR R 00306 6.591 7.207 A3 100.879 2,952,896.00 .93 17120RNT4 7.2707. 04/13/1998 DO 04/13/95 2,925,491.00 .79 9,000,000.00 PHILIP "ORRIS COS NT 6.593 0.731 A2 105.948 9,903,760.00 3.04 718154BB2 9.2502 02/15/2000 9,535,320.00 2.SO 10,000,000.00 FEDERAL MAIL MG ASS" HTM 6.636 5.815 AAA 96.984 9,593,750.00 3.09 313648NF3 5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 9,698,400.00 2.62 3,000,000.00 G M A C RED TERM MS 6.660 8.231 A3 104.783 3,227,070.00 1.00 37042MR4 8.6252 1/10/2000 OR 1/10/95 3,143,490.00 .85 20,000,000.00 CONPIT TO MR FHLNC 6.699 6.976 AM 100.343 20,175,000.00 6.40 999AB0079 7.000% 07/15/2002 20,068,600.00 5.42 15,000,000.00 FEDERAL HIRE LN M6 CORP DEBS 6.713 6.121 AAA 97.859 14,5M,687.50 4.68 31MAOMO 5.9907. 03/06/2001 OD 03/06/96 14,678,850.00 3.97 25,000,000.00 FEDERAL NONE LN MG DEB 6.720 6.713 AAA 100.105 251000,000.00 7.98 3134AOHR2 6.720% 10/02/2000 OR 10/02/95 _ 25,026,250.00 6.76 10,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.756 7.411 AAA 104.578 10,327,343.75 3.33 912827ZX3 07.750% 02/15/2001 DO 02/15/91 10,457,800.00 2.83 I 17,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 6.849 6.469 AAA 100.484 17,270,312.50 5.61 912827Z39 06.500% 08/31/2001 DO 09/03/96 17,SB4,700.00 4.75 1,500,000.00 CHRYSLER CORP DEBS 8.285 10.366 'AS 100.329 2,603,320.00 .48 171196ANS 30.4002 08/91/1999 DO 08/01/87 1,504,935.00 .41 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 5.950 6.756 313,516,453.63 100.00 313,227,761.00 ".65 -------- ------- ----------------- --------- TOTAL 3.916 6.359 370,235,369.59 100.00 369,961,515.36 100.00 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-3UN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS U.S. DOLLAR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 20-JUN-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827Q47 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 cw 06.750% 06/30/1999 DO 06/30/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 24-7UN-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827R46 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.125% 09/30/1999 DO 09/30/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 24-7UN-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827529 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 07.750% 11/30/1999 DO 11/30/94 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 24-3UN-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 912827V66 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 05.7SO% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 0.00 FED WIRE FEES 24-7UN-1997 -3.00 -3.00 0.000000 9128272T8 U S TREASURY NOTES ----------- -3.00 0.00 0.000000 CW 06.375% OS/15/2000 DO 05/15/97 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 PURCHASES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-7UN-1997 -397,845.56 -397,845.56 99.461390 02581RUWI 07/30/1997 25-JUN-1997 397,845.56 397,845.56 99.461390 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM DPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 AMERICAN EX CR CP DISC 25-JUN-1997 -397,84S.56 -397,845.56 99.461390 02581RUW1 07/30/1997 25-7UN-1997 -397,84S.S6 0.00 99.461390 FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 25-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 23-7UN-1997 -4,953,916.67 -4,953,916.67 99.078333 02680JVN8 09/22/1997 23-3UN-1997 4,9S3,916.67 4,9S3,916.67 99.078333 B LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI)- ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 1 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD . 01-7UN-1997 - 30-7UN-1997 TM1DO BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ ______________________________________________________________ __________________ ____________________ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S,000,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 23-7UN-1997 -4,953,916.67 -4,953,916.67 99.078333 026803VNB 08/22/1997 23-7UN-1997 -4,9S3,916.67 0.00 99.078333 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 23-7UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 10.000 000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO INSTL C/O 17-3UN-1997 -9,995,220.00 -9,995,220.00 99.952200 06�370KU7 05.950% O6/19/1996 OD O6/19/97 19-7UN-1997 9,995,220.00 9,995,220.00 99.952200 8 GOLDMAN SACHS & COI NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMC 1010D0,000.00 BANKERS TRUST CO IN TL C/O 17-7UN-1997 -9,995,220.00 -9,995,220.00 99.9S2200 066370KU7 OS.950% 06/19/1998 DD 06/19/97 19-7UN-1997 -9,995,220.00 0.00 99.952200 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 19-7UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1.400 000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 17-7UN-1997 -1,391,000 33 -1 391 000.33 99.357166 071l57uvS 07/29/1997 17-7UN-1997 1.391,000:33 1:391:000.33 99.357166 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. NY ----------- 0.00 0:00 1.000000000 ' 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,400,000.00 BELLSOUTH TELECOM DISC 17-]UN-1997 -1,391,000.33 -1,391,000.33 99.357166 078153uv8 07/29/1997 17-7UN-1997 -1,391,000.33 0.00 99.357166 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 17-IUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700 000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-7UN-1997 -1,689,S73.33 -1,689,573.33 99.386666 M54AUE2 07/14/1997 04-7UN-1997 1,689,S73.33 1,689,573.33 99.396666 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY --------•+-- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,700 000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-7UN-1997 -1,689,573.33 -1,689,573.33 99.386666 MS4AUE2 07/14/1997 04-7UN-1997 -1,689,S73.33 0.00 99.386666 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 04-7UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500 000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-7UN-1997 -496,93333 -496 933.33 99.386666 26154AUE2 07/14/1997 04-7UN-1997 496,933:33 496:933.33 99.386666 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 500,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-7UN-1997 -496,933.33 -496.933.33 99.386666 Page 2 a OCSGOOOIOO MELLON TRUST ' CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-3UN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 263S4AUE2 07/14/1997 04-JUN-1997 -496,933.33 0.00 99.386666 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 04-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 EMERSON ELEC DISC 30-JUN-1997 -299,948.75 -299,948.7S 99.982916 29101cu16 07/01/1997 30-JUN-1997 299,948.75 299,948.7S 99.982916 B GOLD14AN SACHS & CO, NV 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 EMERSON ELEC DISC 30-JUN-1997 -299,948.75 -299,948.7S 99.982916 29101CU16 07/01/1997 30-JUN-1997 -299,948.75 0.00 99.982916 FC GOLD14AN SACHS & CO, NY 30-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,000,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NTS 26-3UN-1997 -2,960,326.67 -2,960,326.67 98.677556 313313MB1 MAT 09/23/1997 27-JUN-1997 2,960,326.67 2,960.326.67 98.677556 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3.000,000.00 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NTS 26-]UN-1997 -2,960.326.67 -2,960,326.67 98.677S56 313313MB1 MAT 09/23/1997 27-JUN-1997 -2,960,326.67 0.00 98.677SS6 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 27-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 11.400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 19-JUN-1997 -11,398,321.67 -11,398,321.67 99.985278 31338SHC3 MAT 06/20/1997 19-JUN-1997 11,398,321.67 11,398,321.67 99.985278 B FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 11.400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 19-JUN-1997 -11,398,321 67 -11.398,321.67 99.985278 31338SHC3 MAT 06/20/1997 19-JUN-1997 -11,398,321:67 0.00 99.985278 FC FIRST 805TON CORP, NY 19-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200.000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 20-JUN-1997 -2,198,031.00 -2,198,031.00 99.910500 313385HJ8 MAT 06/26/1997 20-3UN-1997 2,198,031.00 2,198,031.00 99.910500 B MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 20-JUN-1997 -2,198,031.00 -2,198,031.00 99.910500 31338SH38 MAT 06/26/1997 20-JUN-1997 -2,198,031.00 0.00 99.910500 FC MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY 20-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 __-_- Page 3 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 26-JUN-1997 -2.374,706.67 -2.374,706.67 98.946111 313397LG4 MAT 09/04/1997 26-3UN-1997 2,374,706.67 2,374,706.67 98.946111 B MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 26-JUN-1997 -2,374,706.67 -2,374.706.67 98.946111 313397LG4 MAT 09/04/1997 26-3UN-1997 -2,374,706.67 0.00 98.946111 FC MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SM 26-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS 20-JUN-1997 -6,367,239.11 -6,367,239.11 99.488111 313589JN4 MAT 07/24/1997 20-JUN-1997 6,367,239.11 6,367,239.11 99.488111 e FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 6,400 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS 20-JUN-1997 -6.367,239.11 -6,367.239.11 99.488111 M5893N4 MAT 07/24/1997 20-JUN-1997 -6.367,239.11 0.00 99.488111 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 20-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPEN-PIMCO 2.800,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS 20-3UN-1997 -2,748,380.44 -2,748,380.44 98.1S6444 313589NE9 MAT 10/20/1997 20-3UN-1997 2,748,380.44 2.748,380.44 98.156444 B MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,800.000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS 20-JUN-1997 -2.748,380.44 -2,748,380.44 98.156444 313589NE9 MAT 10/20/1997 20-JUN-1997 -2,748,380.44 0.00 98.156444 FC MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES INC 20-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 12-3UN-1997 -199,172.00 -199,172.00 99.586000 34110AUS12 07/09/1997 12-JUN-1997 199,172.00 199,172.00 99.586000 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200.000.00 FLORIDA PWR CORP DISC 12-JUN-1997 -199,172.00 -199,172.00 99.586000 34110AU92 07/09/1997 12-JUN-1997 -199,172.00 0.00 99.S86000 FC FIRST CHICAGO CAPITAL MARKETS, 12-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 23-3UN-1997 -9,124,828.33 -9,124,828.33 99.182917 Page 4 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1997 - 30-3UN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 36959HVF1 08/15/1997 23-JUN-1997 9.124.828.33 9,124,828.33 99.182917 B CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,200,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 23-JUN-1997 -9,124.828 33 -9,124,828.33 99.182917 369S9HVF1 08/15/1997 23-3UN-1997 -9,124.828:33 0.00 99.182917 FC CITIBANK/CP/IPA, NEW YORK 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400,000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 04-JUN-1997 -398,211.67 -398,211.67 99.SS2918 44922Au32 07/03/1997 04-JUN-1997 398.211.67 398,211.67 99.SS2918 B BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 400.000.00 IBM CR CORP DISC 04-JUN-1997 -398,211 67 -398,211.67 99.552918 44922Au32 07/03/1997 04-JUN-1997 -398,211:67 0.00 99.SS2918 FC BANKERS TRUST CO/COMMERCIAL PA 04-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16.000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 23-JUN-1997 -15,852,533.34 -15,852,533.34 99.078333 63743CVNO 08/22/1997 23-JUN-1997 15,852.533.34 1S,8S2,533.34 99.078333 B LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI)- ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,000,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 23-]UN-1997 -15,852,533.34 -15,852,533.34 99.078333 63743CVN0 08/22/1997 23-JUN-1997 -15,852,533.34 0.00 99.078333 FC LEHMAN COML PAPER INC (LGSI), 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 541.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-JUN-1997 -541.00 -541.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 02-JUN-1997 541.00 541.00 1.000000 B 02-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 1,666,751.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-]UN-1997 -1,666.751.00 -1,666,751.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 02-]UN-1997 1,666,751.00 1,666,751.00 1.000000 B 02-]UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 828.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 12-JUN-1997 -828.00 -828.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 12-3UN-1997 828.00 828.00 1.000000 B 12-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 5 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSOOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 9,000.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 17-JUN-1997 -91000.00 -9,000.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 17-JUN-1997 91000.00 9,000.00 1.000000 B 17-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 18-JUN-1997 -2,200,000.00 -2,200,000.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC II 18-JUN-1997 2,200,000.00 2.200,000.00 1.000000 B 18-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 1,678.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 19-JUN-1997 -1,678.00 -1,678.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 19-JUN-1997 1.678.00 1,678.00 1.000000 B 19-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 86,350.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 20-JUN-1997 -86.350.00 -86,350.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC II 20-JUN-1997 86,350.00 86,3SO.00 1.000000 B 20-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 386.456.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 23-JUN-1997 -386.456.00 -386 456.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC II 23-JUN-1997 386,456.00 386:456.00 1.000000 8 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100 000.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 24-JUN-1997 -100.000.00 -100,000.00 1.000000 99649S906 PUBLIC iI 24-JUN-1997 100.000.00 100,000.00 1.000000 e 24-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S1.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 30-JUN-1997 -51.00 -51.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 30-JUN-1997 51.00 S1.00 1.000000 B 30-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO BBS,62S.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 30-JUN-1997 -BBS,62S.00 -885,625.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC II 30-JUN-1997 88S,62S.00 885,625.00 1.000000 B 30-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 6 0 OCS0000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-IUN-1997 - 30-3UN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 35,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JuN-1997 -35,583,789.06 -35,583,789.06 101.667968 M827R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DD 08/31/94 23-JUN-1997 3S,583,789.06 35,583,789.06 101.667968 8 FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 35,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 -751,953.13 -751,953.13 101.667968 91527R20 06.875% 08/31/1999 DO O8/31/94 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 101.667968 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3S,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 -36,335,742 19 -36,335,742.19 101.667968 M827R20 06.87S% 08/31/1999 DO 08/31/94 23-3UN-1997 -36,335,742:19 0.00 101.667968 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 23-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-JUN-1997 -3,402,921.88 -3 402,921.88 100.085937 M827V33 05.750% 09/30/1997 DO 10/02/95 27-JUN-1997 3,402,921.88 3:402,921.88 100.085937 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-JUN-1997 -47,005.46 -47,005.46 100.085937 M827V33 05.750% 09/30/1997 DD 10/02/9S 27-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 100.085937 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3,400 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 27-JUN-1997 -3,449,927 34 -3,449,927.34 100.085937 91f827V33 05.7S0% 09/30/1997 DO 10/02/95 27-JUN-1997 -3,449,927:34 0.00 100.085937 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 27-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-3UN-1997 -33,181,104.00 -33,181,104.00 100.548800 91'L8272T8 06.375% OS/15/2000 DO 05/15/97 31-3UL-1997 33,181,104.00 33,181,104.00 100.548800 B LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 33.000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-3UN-1997 -440,186.82 -440,186.82 100.548800 M8272T8 06.37S% 05/15/2000 DO 05/15/97 31-JUL-1997 0.00 0.00 100.548800 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,000 000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 -17,107,578.13 -17,307,S78.13 100.632812 91f8272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DO 05/15/97 23-JUN-1997 17,107,578.13 17,107,S78.13 100.632812 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 Papa 7 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 17,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 -114,853.94 -114,853.94 100.632812 9128272T8 06.37S% OS/lS/2000 DO OS/15/97 23-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 100.632812 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 17,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 -17,222,432.07 -17,222.432.07 100.632812 9128272T8 06.375% OS/15/2000 DD OS/15/97 23-JUN-1997 -17,222,432.07 0.00 100.632812 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,000.000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 -16,100,000.00 -16,100,000.00 100.62S000 9128272T8 06.375% OS/15/2000 DO 05/15/97 23-JUN-1997 16,100,000.00 16,100,000.00 100.625000 B GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 16,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 -108,097.83 -108,097.83 100.625000 915272T8 06.375% 05/15/2000 DO OS/15/97 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 100.625000 IB ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 16,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-3UN-1997 -16,208,097.83 -16,208,097.83 100.62S000 9128272T8 06.375% OS/15/2000 DO 05/15/97 23-3UN-1997 -16,208,097.83 0.00 100.62S000 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 23-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 14-MAY-1997 -20,062,S00.00 -20,062.500.00 100.312500 999ABD944 7.000% 06/1S/2002 23-JUN-1997 -20,062,500.00 0.00 100.312500 FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 18-JUN-1997 -20,175,000.00 -20 175 000.00 100.875000 999ABG079 7.000% 07/1S/2002 23-JUL-1997 20,17S,000.00 20:175:000.00 100.875000 B FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 SALES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -6,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS 26-3UN-1997 6,367 239 11 6,367,239.11 99.488111 3135893N4 MAT 07/24/1997 27-JUN-1997 -6,367:239:11 -6,367,239.11 99.488111 S MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, NY ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 0 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SNARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -6,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS 26-JUN-1997 6,792.89 6,792.89 99.488111 313589JN4 MAT 07/24/1997 27-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 99.488111 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -6,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NTS 26-JUN-1997 6,374,032.00 6,374,032.00 99.488111 313S893N4 MAT 07/24/1997 27-JUN-1997 6,374,032.00 0.00 99.488111 FC MORGAN STANLEY & C9 INC, NY 27-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC, 19-JUN-1997 1,585,813.33 1,SSS,813.33 99.113333 34539TU37 07/03/1997 19-3UN-1997 -1,585,813.33 -1,585,813.33 99.113333 S ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 19-JUN-1997 10,733.34 10,733.34 99.113333 34539TU37 07/03/1997 19-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 99.113333 Is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,600,000.00 FORD MTR CR CO DISC 19-JUN-1997 1,596,546.67 1,596,S46.67 99.113333 34539TU37 07/03/1997 19-JUN-1997 1,596,546.67 0.00 99.113333 FC 19-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO i -1,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-JUN-1997 992,728.06 992.728.06 99.272806 36959Hu13 07/01/1997 19-JUN-1997 -992,728.06 -992.728.06 99.272806 S MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES - FIX ---------i- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-JUN-1997 5,425.27 5,425.27 99.272806 36959HU13 07/01/1997 19-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 99.272806 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1.000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 19-JUN-1997 998,153.33 998,153.33 99.272806 36959HU13 07/01/1997 19-JUN-1997 998,153.33 0.00 99.272806 FC MORGAN (J.P.) SECURITIES - FIX 19-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,689,573.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 04-JUN-1997 1,689,573.00 1,689,573.00 1.000000 Page 9 _._- OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM10D BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 999495906 PUBLIC II 04-3UN-1997 -1,689,573.00 -1.689,573.00 1.000000 S 04-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -95,145.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 04-JUN-1997 9S,145.00 95,145.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC IT 04-3UN-1997 -95,145.00 -95.145.00 1.000000 5 04-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,175,619.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 19-JUN-1997 2,175,619.00 2,175,619.00 1.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC II 19-JUN-1997 -2,175,619.00 -2,175,619.00 1.000000 5 19-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -3.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 20-JUN-1997 3.00 3.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 20-JUN-1997 -3.00 -3.00 1.000000 S 20-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -12.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 24-3UN-1997 12.00 12.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 24-3UN-1997 -12.00 -12.00 1.000000 S 24-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -397,846.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 25-JUN-1997 397,846.00 397,846.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 25-JUN-1997 -397,846.00 -397,846.00 1.000000 S 2S-JuN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -174,707.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 26-JUN-1997 174,707.00 174,707.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 26-JUN-1997 -174,707.00 -174,707.00 1.000000 5 26-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -36,222.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 27-JUN-1997 36,222.00 36,222.00 1.000000 999495906 PUBLIC TI 27-3UN-1997 -36,222.00 -36,222.00 1.000000 S 27-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR FIXED INCOME SECURITIES LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -S,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-JUN-1997 S,066,406.2S S,066,406.25 101.328125 912827Q47 06.7SO% 06/30/1999 DO 06/30/94 19-JUN-1997 -5,019,140.63 -5,019,140.63 101.328125 S LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 47,265.62 47,265.62 1.000000000 Page 10 e, OCS0000100 MELLON TRUST e CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-JUN-1997 158,494.48 158,494.48 101.328125 912827047 06.7SO% 06/30/1999 DO 06/30/94 19-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 101.328125 i5 ----------- 0.00 0.00 11000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 17-JUN-1997 5 224 900.73 5,224,900.73 101.328125 912827047 06.7SO% 06/30/1999 DO 06/30/94 19-JUN-1997 5:224:900.73 0.00 101.328125 FC LEHMAN BROS INC 19-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,500 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 35,276,250.00 35,276,250.00 102.250000 9D827R46 07.125% 09/30/1999 OD 09/30/94 23-3UN-1997 -35,710,849.21 -35,730,849.21 102.250000 5 FIRST BOSTON CORP. NY ----------- -434,599.21 -434,S99.21 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,500 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 564,159.84 564,159.84 102.250000 M827R46 07.12S% 09/30/1999 DO 09/30/94 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 102.250000 I5 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -34,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 35 840,409.84 35,840,409.84 102.250000 912827R46 07.125% 09/30/1999 OD 09/30/94 23-JUN-1997 35:840,409.84 0.00 102.2S0000 FC FIRST BOSTON CORP, NY 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 17,635,507.81 17,635,SO7.81 103.738281 912827529 07.750% 11/30/1999 DO 11/30/94 23-JUN-1997 -17,518,771.80 -17,528,771.80 103.738281 s GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. NY ----------- 116,736.01 116,736.01 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 82,793.72 82,793.72 103.738281 91f827529 07.750% 11/30/1999 DO 11/30/94 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 103.738281 is ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -17,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-3UN-1997 17,718,301.53 17,718,301.53 103.738281 912827529 07.750% 11/30/1999 DO 11/30/94 23-3UN-1997 17,718,301.53 0.00 103.738281 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Page 11 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1997 - 30-3UN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ -13,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-3UN-1997 12,835,468.75 12,835,468.75 98.734375 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DD 10/31/95 23-JUN-1997 -13,102,578.13 -13,102,578.13 98.734375 5 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY ----------- -267,109.38 -267,109.38 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13.000 000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-3UN-1997 109,687.50 109,687.50 98.734375 91f827v66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 98.734375 IS ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -13,000,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 20-3UN-1997 12 945 156.25 12.945,156.25 98.734375 912827V66 05.750% 10/31/2000 DO 10/31/95 23-JUN-1997 12:945:156.25 0.00 98.734375 FC GOLDMAN SACHS & CO, NY 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-3UN-1997 33,216,562.50 33,216,562.SO 100.656250 9128272TB 06.375% 05/1S/2000 DO O5/15/97 23-JUN-1997 -33,194,341.07 -33,194,341.07 100.656250 S LEHMAN BROS INC ----------- 22,221.43 22,221.43 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33,000,000.00 U 5 TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 222,951.77 222,951.77 100.656250 9128272T8 06.375% OS/15/2000 DO O5/15/97 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 100.656250 35 ----------- 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -33.000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 20-JUN-1997 33,439,514.27 33,439,514.27 100.656250 9128272T8 06.375% OS/15/2000 DO 05/1S/97 23-3UN-1997 33,439,514.27 0.00 100.6S62S0 FC LEHMAN BROS INC 23-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 18-JUN-1997 20,203,125.00 20,203,125.00 101.015625 999ABD944 7.000% 06/1S/2002 23-3UN-1997 -20,062,500.00 -20,062.500.00 101.015625 5 FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & ----------- 140,625.00 140,625.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -20,000.000.00 COMMIT TO PUR FHLMC 18-JUN-1997 20,203,125.00 20,203.125.00 101.015625 999ABD944 7.000% 06/15/2002 23-JUN-1997 20,203,125.00 0.00 101.015625 FC FREDDIE MAC SECURITIES SALES & 23-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 MATURITIES U.S. DOLLAR CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -300,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 30-JUN-1997 297,SS3.17 297,553.17 100.000000 Page 12 v. OCS0000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-3UN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE %RATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ 02680JTwl 06/30/1997 30-JUN-1997 -297,553.17 -297,553.17 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 30-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -2,200,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 18-JUN-1997 2,181,143.56 2,181,143.56 100.000000 263S4ATJ3 06/18/1997 18-JUN-1997 -2,181,143.56 -2,181,143.56 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 18-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -800,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-JUN-1997 794,255.56 794,255.56 100.000000 26354AT46 06/04/1997 04-JUN-1997 -794.255.56 -794,2SS.56 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 04-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -11,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 20-JUN-1997 11,398,321 67 11 398,321.67 100.000000 31338SHC3 MAT 06/20/1997 20-JUN-1997 -11,398,321:67 -11:398,321.67 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 20-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 26-JUN-1997 2,198,031.00 2,198,031.00 100.000000 31338SH38 MAT 06/26/1997 26-JUN-1997 -2,198,031.00 -2,198,031.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 26-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-JUN-1997 199,120.33 199,120.33 100.000000 313397GU9 MAT 06/12/1997 12-JUN-1997 -199,120.33 -199.120.33 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 12-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -11,400,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-JUN-1997 11,339,263 33 11,339,263.33 100.000000 313S89HB2 MAT 06/19/1997 19-JuN-1997 -11,339,263:33 -11,339,263.33 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 19-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO -1,400,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 17-JUN-1997 1,388,345.00 1,388,345.00 100.000000 369S9HTHO 06/17/1997 17-JUN-1997 -1,388,345.00 -1,388,34S.00 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 17-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO -100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 24-JUN-1997 99,042.44 99,042.44 100.000000 369S9HTQO 06/24/1997 24-JUN-1997 -99,042.44 -99,042.44 100.000000 MT BOND MATURITY 24-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 13 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD O1-JUN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURB GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ INTEREST U.S. DOLLAR LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 300,000.00 AMERITECH CORP DISC 30-JUN-1997 2,446.83 2.446.83 0.000000 02680JTH1 06/30/1997 30-]UN-1997 2,446.83 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 2.200,000.00 DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 18-]UN-1997 18,856.44 18,956.44 0.000000 26354ATJ3 06/18/1997 18-3UN-1997 18,B56.44 0.00 0.000000 iT 19-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 800,000.00 OU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 04-3UN-1997 5,744.44 5,744.44 0.000000 26354AT46 06/04/1997 04-3UN-1997 5,744.44 0.00 0.000000 IT 04-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 11,400,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS DISC 20-JUN-1997 1.678.33 1,678.33 0.000000 313385HC3 MAT O6/20/1997 20-JUN-1997 1,678.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 20-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 2,200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 26-JUN-1997 1,969.00 1,969.00 0.000000 313385H38 MAT 06/26/1997 26-JUN-1997 1,969.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 26-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 200,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 12-3UN-1997 879.67 879.67 0.000000 313397GU9 MAT O6/12/1997 12-JUN-1997 879.67 0.00 0.000000 IT 12-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 11,400 000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 19-3UN-1997 60.736.67 60,736.67 0.000000 315589HB2 MAT 06/19/1997 19-JUN-1997 60,736.67 0.00 0.000000 IT 19-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 7,100,000.00 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR N 00177 30-JUN-1997 107,624.33 107,624.33 0.000000 345402H33 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 30-JUN-1997 107,624.33 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 14 e, OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED POSTED TRANSACTIONS - LOCAL/BASE BASE: USD 01-JUN-1997 - 30-JUN-1997 TM100 BASE AMOUNT/ SHARES/PAR VALUE EFFECTIVE DATE/ LOCAL AMOUNT/ COST/ LOCAL PRICE/ SECURITY ID/ DESCRIPTION/ SETTLE DATE/ COST/ INV GAIN LOSS/ BASE PRICE/ TRANS CODE BROKER COMPL DATE GAIN LOSS CURR GAIN LOSS BASE XRATE/ -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------------ LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 1,400.000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 17-JUN-1997 11,65S.00 11,655.00 0.000000 369S9HTHO 06/17/1997 17-JUN-1997 11,655.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 17-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 24-JUN-1997 957.S6 957.56 0.000000 36959HTQO 06/24/1997 24-JUN-1997 957.56 0.00 0.000000 IT 24-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 5,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-JUN-1997 168,750.00 168,750.00 0.000000 912827Q47 06.750% 06/30/1999 DO 06/30/94 30-JUN-1997 168,750.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 43,000.000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 02-JUN-1997 1.666,250.00 1,666,250.00 0.000000 912827529 07.750% 11/30/1999 DO 11/30/94 31-MAY-1997 1,666,250.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 18,500,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES 30-3UN-1997 716.875.00 716,875.00 0.000000 912827S45 07.750% 12/31/1999 DO 01/03/95 30-3UN-1997 716,875.00 0.00 0.000000 IT 30-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-JUN-1997 541.44 541.44 0.000000 99949S906 PUBLIC II 01-JUN-1997 541.44 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-3UN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 LONG TERM OPER-PINCO 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 02-3UN-1997 501.54 501.54 0.000000 999495906 PUBLIC II 01-3UN-1997 501.54 0.00 0.000000 IT 02-JUN-1997 0.00 0.00 1.000000000 0.00 Page 15 S'1 4 M'P'1'P. i �ffira ,VwJ YI v � ha € u 7 wa 'r�kl�az , air' AGENDA e IN REA7 , �YY k Y'3 1u s'n n♦rt �� OgON'1JETAh�I f .P6�k', '� fi� ITEM coiBEtFra1 TRANSMITTAL O,� DSTDISCUSSION r d k ""' ) r + �7 tO,y ��BDS°MEE71Nf30ATEy�h„a 4 +gl�a 'u � � �y TM w� , '' h'¢nc'�BDS AGENDAfIFM irk n s� of FtY)I, i F MEETING DATE .'.0 FOR INFORMATION OMITS: OMT$' n: (Originator) POC: PDC OMMf1D..N0._:h DISTRICT NO. CONTACT_ FAHR: 9 JuI97 PAH ALL 2210, S. Kozak,2504 EXEC: ..,EXEC. STEER: -STEER'`' Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: 30 Jul 97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER (ALL DISTRICTS) Recommended Action(st: - 1. Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration 6 Human Resources Committee adopt a motion to recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt attached Resolution No. 97-27. CEOA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: NOTAPPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC Data Notice of Exemption Filed: ITEM: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on January 22, 1997 - CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES mx.1 ewes ow. T.W.) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $21,958,000 $21,958,000 NIA NIA NIA SOURCE: DISTRICTS Schedule,Une Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Lina Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION BUDGETTOTAL CHANGES THIS AR PROJECT- BUDGET First Year In Budget: Revenue producing program. $21.958,000.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AT AMOUNT WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES If YES,state number. _Permanent Limited Term I If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section BavaeEea9ear Page 1 of 3 H:\WP.OTAtFIN12210U(OZAK1971NVEST.AIT ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(List): Odgn r DUB 1. Investment Policy Statement 2. Board Resolution N RRENCES: 2-+ Signet r Data D)dsi n anage (OIeeJ, ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) 4 Y / 1. Investment Policy Statement Deparenent H( d(Or Designee) 2. Board Resolution %7. !�+/r/Saw /i 17/4'1 Sig a Date Assis nt General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background andfor Summary) Backoround The Districts' current Investment Policy Statement was reviewed and approved by the Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee (FAHR) on September 11, 1996, and originally adopted by the Joint Boards on September 25, 1996 (Resolution No. 96-79). On January 22, 1997. the Joint Boards approved certain technical revisions to the Districts' Investment Policy as recommended by the FAHR Committee. The Investment Policy governs the investment activities of Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO), the Districts' external money manager, on behalf of the Districts. The Districts' Investment Policy Statement has received the Investment Policy Certification of Excellence Award from the Municipal Treasurers' Association of the United States & Canada. The attached Investment Policy document consists of the Policy Statement itself, and the following four Appendices: A. Summary of Investment Authorization; B. Board Resolution No. 97-XX; C. California Govemment Code Section 53600, Investment of Surplus Funds; and D. Glossary of Terms. Annual Review of Investment Pollcv The Investment Policy includes the requirement that the Districts shall review its Investment Policy annually (Sections 1.2 and 16.1). Likewise, Section 53646 of the California Government Code (the"Codej requires local agencies to review their investment policy annually, and readopt their policy at a public meeting. This staff report presents the second annual review of the Districts' Investment Policy Statement to the FAHR Committee for consideration in your capacity as the oversight committee for the Investment Policy(Section 16.2). With adoption of the attached Resolution, the Joint Boards would readopt the Districts' current Investment Policy Statement, portfolio performance benchmarks, and monitoring and reporting requirements. Annual Delegation of Investment Authority Effective January 1, 1997, SB 109 introduced a new requirement to the annual review process. Section 53607 of the Code now states that governing boards of local agencies may delegate authority to invest and/or reinvest agency funds to the agency's Treasurer for a one-year period only. With adoption of the attached Resolution, the Joint Boards would delegate investment authority to the Director of Finance/Treasurer for a one-year period commencing on the date that the Resolution is adopted. Recommended Action Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee adopt a motion to recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt attached Resolution No. 97-)(X. R.a.aaos W Page 2 of 2 H:IW P.DTAIFINI22t OWOZAKL971NVEST.AIT tl RESOLUTION NO. 97-27 AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS, AND ADOPTING DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS, AND ADOPTING DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS . . . .. . .. .. .. . . . WHEREAS, on December 8, 1994, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 94-156, appointing the Director of Finance as Treasurer of County Sanitation District Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California; and, WHEREAS, on September 25, 1996, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 96-79, readopting the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, and establishing specific performance benchmarks and objectives, together with a schedule of frequency of investment performance reports; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53607, the Boards of Directors may delegate authority to invest and/or reinvest Districts' funds to the Treasurer for a one-year period; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53646, the Districts are required to review their Investment Policy annually and readopt their Policy at a public meeting, which Policy will establish specific performance benchmarks and objectives, and specific monitoring and reports. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the authority of the Boards of Directors to invest or reinvest Districts' surplus funds, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, or to deposit for safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with depositories, as provided for in California Government d Code Sections 53608 and 53630, is hereby delegated to the Districts'Treasurer for a one-year period commencing on the dale this Resolution is adopted, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53607. Section 2: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Investment Policy Statement of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, as set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following specific performance benchmarks for their two investment funds in accordance with Section 14.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy: LIQUID OPERATING MONIES: The Short-Term Operating Fund will be compared to the three month T-Bill rate, and the Callan Active Cash Flow Income Style Group. The Callan Active Cash Flow Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a maximum maturity of one year. LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES: The Lang-Term Operating Fund will be compared to the Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate One-to-Five Year Maturity Index and to the Callan Defensive Fixed Income Style Group. Section 4: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt a performance monitoring and reporting schedule, as required by Section 15.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy, which schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit"B," and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED AND ADOPTED at regular meeting held July 30, 1997. H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\RES\97-27.DOC p5\PlCil O� 9Pf i 49 • C�p Ik COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT Reviewed and Approved by Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee on July 9, 1997 Adopted by Joint Boards of Directors on July 30, 1997 (Resolution No. 97-27) osum � h b b o COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT Reviewed and Approved by Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee on July 9, 1997 Adopted by Joint Boards of Directors on July 30, 1997 (Resolution No. 97-27) krVI 00 MUNICIPAL TREASURERS'ASSOCIATION December 10, 1996 V"IT1n tT<T ` ' ` ` °"°°° Gary G. Streed Director of Finance/Treasurer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Mr. Streed: The Municipal Treasurers'Association is pleased to present the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California with the Association's Investment Policy Certification. Members of the Association's Investment Policy Certification Committee congratulate the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California for its success in developing a comprehensive written investment policy which meets the criteria set forth by the Association's Investment Policy Certification Program. Our review of your investment policy is limited to the documentation submitted. The Certification is not a guarantee against loss due to economic and market conditions or human behavior. The Association's Investment Policy Certification Committee Chairman, Rod Rich, will be presenting the Investment Policy Certification plaque to all recipients at the Association's 1997 Annual Conference in Sacramento,California. The County Sanitation Districts will be recognized during the Awards Luncheon on Wednesday, August 20. We hope that you will be able to attend this luncheon, however, if your schedule does not permit you to attend, please call me at (202) 833-1017. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California is to be commended for enhancing its fiscal responsibility in the management of fiscal funds. Sincerely, Ex�we hector 1229 Nineteenth Street N,W-Washington,DC 20036 PHONE 202-833-1017 FAX 202-833-0375 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I2pk Page 1.0 Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3.0 Standard of Prudence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4.0 Investment Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5.0 Delegation of Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions . . . . . . . . . 4 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 9.0 Collateralization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 10.0 Safekeeping and Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 11.0 Diversification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 12.0 Maximum Maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 13.0 Internal Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 14.0 Performance Objectives and Benchmarks . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 15.0 Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 16.0 Investment Policy Adoption and Revision . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Appendix A. Summary of Investment Authorization B. Board Resolution No. 97-27, Authorizing the Districts' Treasurer to Invest and/or Reinvest Districts' Funds, and Adopting Investment Policy and Performance Benchmarks C. Government Code Sec. 53600 D. Glossary COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT 1.0 Policy: It is the policy of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) to invest public funds in a manner which ensures the safety and preservation of capital while meeting reasonably anticipated operating expenditure needs, achieving a reasonable rate of return and conforming to all state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds. 1.1. This Investment Policy is set forth by CSDOC for the following purposes: 1.1.1. To establish a clear understanding for the Boards of Directors, CSDOC management, responsible employees and third parties of the objectives, policies and guidelines for the investment of the CSDOC's idle and surplus funds. 1.1.2. To offer guidance to investment staff and any external investment advisors on the investment of CSDOC funds (see Appendix"A"). 1.1.3. To establish a basis for evaluating investment results. 1.2. CSDOC establishes investment policies which meet its current investment goals. CSDOC shall review this policy annually, and may change its policies as its investment objectives change. 2.0 Scope: This Investment Policy applies to all financial assets of CSDOC, except for the funds of the Deferred Compensation Plan, which are managed externally; proceeds of CSDOC's capital projects financing program, which are invested in accordance with provisions of their specific bond indentures; and such funds excluded by law or other Board-approved covenant or agreement. These funds are accounted for by CSDOC as represented in CSDOC's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and include: General Fund Special Reserve Funds • Debt Service Funds (unless prohibited by bond indentures) • Capital Project Funds Enterprise Funds • Internal Service Funds • Trust and Agency Funds Any new Fund established by the Boards of Directors, unless exempted by the Board Page 1 of 13 3.0 Standard of Prudence: 3.1 The standard of prudence to be used by CSDOC internal staff shall be the "prudent person"standard defined below in Section 3.1.1, and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. Investment staff acting in accordance with written procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. 3.1.1 The Prudent Person Standard: Investments shall be made with judgment and care—under circumstances then prevailing— which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. 4.0 Investment Objectives: The primary objectives, in priority order, of CSDOC's investment activities shall be: 4.1 Safety: The safely and preservation of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program of CSDOC. Investments shall be selected in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in CSDOC's overall portfolio. This will be accomplished through a program of diversification, more fully described in Section 11.0, and maturity limitations, more fully described in Section 12.0, in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed the income generated from the remainder of the portfolio. 4.2 Liquidity: The investment program will be administered in a manner that will ensure that sufficient funds are available for CSDOC to meet its reasonably anticipated operating expenditure needs. 4.3 Return on Investments: The CSDOC investment portfolio will be structured and managed with the objective of achieving a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with legal, safety, and liquidity considerations. Page 2 of 13 5.0 Delegation of Authority: 5.1 Authority to manage CSDOC's investment program is derived from the California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq. and Sections 53635 at seq. The Boards of Directors hereby delegates management responsibility for the CSDOC investment program to it's Director of Finance/Treasurer, who shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program, consistent with this Policy. The Financial Manager/Assistant Treasurer shall be responsible for day-today administration, monitoring, and the development of written administrative procedures for the operation of the investment program, consistent with this Policy. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this Policy and the procedures established by the Treasurer. The Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken by CSDOC internal staff, and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of internal staff and external investment advisors engaged in accordance with Section 5.3. 5.2 The administrative procedures for the operation of CSDOC's investment program will provide for, but not be limited to, the following: 5.2.1 Formats for monthly and quarterly reports to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, and the Boards of Directors. 5.2.2 Compliance with generally accepted accounting principles of the Government Accounting Standards Board. 5.2.3 Establishment of benchmarks for performance measurement. 5.2.4 Establishment of a system of written internal controls. 5.2.5 Establishment of written procedures for competitive bids and offerings of securities that may be purchased or sold by internal CSDOC staff. 5.2.6 Establishment of a Desk Procedures Manual for treasury operations and management. 5.3 The Boards of Directors of CSDOC may, in its discretion, engage the services of one or more registered investment advisors to assist in the management of CSDOC's investment portfolio in a manner consistent with CSDOC's objectives. Such external investment advisors, which shall be selected through a competitive process, shall be granted discretion to purchase and sell investment securities in accordance with this Investment Policy. Such advisors must be registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or be exempt from such registration. Page 3 of 13 6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest: 6.1 Officers and employees of CSDOC involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activities that could conflict with proper execution of CSDOC's investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials shall disclose to the General Manager any material financial interests in financial institutions that conduct business within CSDOC's boundaries, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial investment positions, the performance of which could be related to the performance of positions in CSDOC's portfolio. 7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions: 7.1 For investment transactions conducted by CSDOC internal staff, the Treasurer will maintain a list of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services to CSDOC, including "primary" or regional dealers that qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15C3-1 (uniform net capital rule), and Federal or State of California chartered banks. No public deposit shall be made except in a qualified public depository as established by State law. All financial institutions which desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions with CSDOC must supply the following for evaluation by the Treasurer: 7.1.1. Audited financial statements for the institution's three (3) most recent fiscal years. 7.1.2. A statement, in the format prescribed by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), certifying that the institution has reviewed CSDOC's Investment Policy and that all securities offered to the Districts shall comply fully and in every instance with all provisions of the California Government Code and with this Investment Policy. 7.1.3. A statement describing the regulatory status of the dealer, and the background and expertise of the dealer's representatives. Selection of financial institutions, broker/dealers, and banks authorized to engage in transactions with CSDOC shall be made through a competitive process. An annual review of the financial condition of qualified institutions will be conducted by the Treasurer. Page 4 of 13 7.2 Selection of brokerldealers used by external investment advisors retained by CSDOC, shall be in compliance with contract provisions between CSDOC and any external investment advisors, and shall be in substantially the following form: Use of Securities Brokers Neither the Investment Advisor nor any parent, subsidiary or related firm shall act as a securities broker with respect to any purchases or sales of securities which may be made on behalf of CSDOC, provided that this limitation shall not prevent the Investment Advisor from utilizing the services of a securities broker which is a parent, subsidiary or related firm, provided such broker effects transactions on a "cost only" or "nonprofit" basis to itself and provides competitive execution. The Investment Advisor shall provide the Districts with a list of suitable independent brokerage firms (including names and addresses) meeting the requirements of Government Code Section 53601.5, and, unless otherwise directed by CSDOC, the Investment Advisor may utilize the service of any of such independent securities brokerage firms it deems appropriate to the extent that such firms are competitive with respect to price of services and execution. 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments: All investments shall be made in accordance with Sections 53600 at seq. of the Government Code of California, and as described within this Investment Policy. Permitted investments under this Policy shall include: 8.1 Securities issued by the US Government or an agency of the US Government and fully guaranteed as to payment by the US Government or agency of the US Government. Investment in mortgage-backed bonds and CMOs is not governed by this Section 8.1, even if such bonds are issued by agencies of the US Government. See Section 8.2 for conditions of purchase of mortgage-backed securities. See Section 8.11 for conditions of purchase of CMOs. 8.2 Mortgage-backed securities issued by an agency of the US Government, which are backed by pools of mortgages guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, or an agency thereof. Selection of mortgage derivatives, which include interest-only payments (1Os) and principal-only payments (POs); inverse floaters, and RE-REMICs (Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits), is hereby prohibited. 8.3 Commercial paper rated a minimum of"PV by Moody's Investor Services (Moody's), or "Al" by Standard & Poor's Inc. (S&P) provided that: (a) the maturity does not exceed 180 days from the dale of purchase; (b) the issuer is a corporation organized and operating in the United States with assets in excess of$500 million; and (c) no more than 15% of the portfolio is invested Page 5 of 13 in commercial paper, except that a maximum of 30% of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper, so long as the average maturity of all commercial paper in the portfolio does not exceed 31 days. 8.4 Banker's acceptances issued by institutions, the short-term obligations of which are rated a minimum of "P1" by Moody's, or "Al" by S&P provided that: (a) the acceptance is eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; (b) the maturity does not exceed 270 days; and (c) no more than 40% of the total portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances. 8.5 Medium term (or corporate) notes issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States, the long-term obligations of which are rated at least "AY by Moody's, or"A-" by S&P. No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in eligible medium term or corporate notes. 8.6 Shares of mutual funds investing in securities permitted under this policy and under California Government Code Section 53601. Such funds must either: (1) attain the highest ranking, or the highest letter and numerical rating, provided by not less than two of the three largest nationally recognized rating services; or(2) have an investment Advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years of experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized under this Policy and under California Government Code Section 53601, and with assets under management in excess of $500 million. The purchase price of such shares may not include any commissions. Investment in mutual funds may not exceed 15% of the total portfolio. 8.7 Certificates of deposit: 8.7.1 Secured (collateralized)time deposits in banks meeting the following criteria: (a) in good standing with the California State Collateral Pool; and (b) having a net operating profit in the two (2) most recently completed fiscal years. 8.7.2 Negotiable certificates of deposit(NCDs) issued by financial institutions which shall have long-term debt rated "AY or higher by Moody's, or "A-" or higher by S&P; or have short-term debt rated at least "131" by Moody's, or"Al" by S&P, or as otherwise approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors. 8.8 Taxable ortax-exempt municipal bonds issued by the State of California or its subdivisions. Such securities must be rated "A3" or higher by Moody's, or"A-" or higher by S&P; or as otherwise approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors. Page 6 of 13 8.9 The State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). 8.10 The Orange County Investment Pool. 8.11 Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) issued by agencies of the US Government which are backed by pools of mortgages guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, or an agency thereof, and asset- backed securities rated "Aaa" by Moody's and "AAA" by S&P. Selection of mortgage derivatives, which include interest-only payments (IOs) and principal-only payments (POs); inverse floaters, and RE-REMICS (Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits), is hereby prohibited. Securities eligible for purchase under this Section 8.11 shall be issued by an issuer having a rating on its unsecured long-term debt of"A" or higher. Combined purchases of mortgage-backed securities, CMOs and asset-backed securities as authorized under this Section 8.11, may not exceed 20% of the total Long-Term Operating Monies portfolio. 8.12 Repurchase agreements provided that: 8.12.1 All repurchase agreements shall be collateralized with securities eligible for purchase under this Policy, and are maintained at a level of at least 102% of the market value of the repurchase agreements. Collateral securities shall be delivered to a third-party safekeeping agent or to CSDOC's custodian bank. 8.12.2 All repurchase agreements must be the subject of a Master Repurchase Agreement between CSDOC and the provider of the repurchase agreement. The Master Repurchase Agreement shall be substantially in the form developed by the Public Securities Association. 8.13 Reverse repurchase agreements provided that: 8.13.1 Generally, no more than 20% of CSDOC's portfolio shall be invested in reverse repurchase agreements, and there shall be no long-term reverse repurchase agreements unless otherwise authorized by the Districts' Boards of Directors. 8.13.2 The maximum maturity of reverse repurchase agreements shall be ninety (90) days. 8.13.3 Reverse repurchase agreements shall mature on the exact date of a known cash flow which will be unconditionally available to repay the maturing reverse repurchase. Page 7 of 13 8.13.4 Proceeds of reverse repurchase agreements shall be used solely to supplement portfolio income or to provide portfolio liquidity, and shall not be used to speculate on market movements. 8.13.5 All reverse repurchase agreements must be the subject of a Master Repurchase Agreement between CSDOC and the provider of the reverse repurchase agreement. The Master Repurchase Agreement shall be substantially in the form developed by the Public Securities Association. 8.14 Sales of CSDOC-owned securities in the secondary market may incur losses in order to improve the risk or return characteristics of the portfolio, to prevent anticipated further erosion of principal, or when trading for securities that result in an expected net economic gain to CSDOC. 8.15 If securities owned by the CSDOC are downgraded by either Moody's or S&P to a level below the quality required by this Investment Policy, it shall be CSDOC's policy to review the credit situation and make a determination as to whether to sell or retain such securities in the portfolio. If a decision is made to retain the downgraded securities in the portfolio, their presence in the portfolio will be monitored and reported monthly to the CSDOC General Manager, the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and Boards of Directors. 9.0 Collateralization: Collateralization will be required for secured time deposits, as more fully described in Section 8.7.1; and repurchase agreements, as more fully described in Section B.12.1. Collateral will always be held by an independent third-party, as more fully described in Section 10.1. The right of collateral substitution is granted. 10.0 Safekeeping and Custody: 10.1 All securities transactions, including collateral for repurchase agreements, entered into by, or on behalf of CSDOC, shall be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment(DVP) basis. Securities will be held by CSDOC's third-party custodian bank, which shall be selected through a competitive process, or that agent's representative, or in the agent's account at the Federal Reserve Bank, and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. 11.0 Diversification: CSDOC will diversify its investments by security type, issuer, and financial institution in accordance with the following: Page 8 of 13 11.1 There is no limit on investment in securities issued by or guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. 11.2 No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in securities of a single agency of the U.S. government, which does not provide the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. 11.3 No more than 5% of the portfolio may be invested in securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. government or its agencies. 11.4 No individual holding shall constitute more than 5% of the total debt outstanding of any issuer. 11.5 No more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances. 11.6 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper, except that 30% of the portfolio may be so invested so long as the average maturity of all commercial paper in the portfolio does not exceed 31 days. 11.7 No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in medium-term (corporate) notes. 11.8 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in mutual funds. 11.9 No more than 30% of the portfolio may be invested in negotiable certificates of deposit. 11.10 No more than 10% of the portfolio may be invested in eligible municipal bonds. 11.11 No more than 20% of the Long Term Operating Monies portfolio may be invested in a combination of mortgage-backed securities, CMOs and asset- backed securities. Mortgage-backed securities, CMOs and asset-backed securities may only be purchased by the Districts' external money managers with prior Board approval, and may not be purchased by the Districts' staff. 11.12 No more than the lesser of 15% of the portfolio or the statutory maximum may be invested in LAIF. 11.13 No more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in the Orange County Investment Pool. 11.14 No more than 20% of the portfolio may be invested in repurchase agreements. Page 9 of 13 12.0 Maximum Maturities: To the extent possible, CSDOC will attempt to match its investments with reasonably anticipated cash flow requirements. The Treasurer shall develop a five-year cash flow forecast, which shall be updated quarterly. Based on this forecast, the Treasurer shall designate, from time-to-time, the amounts to be allocated to the investment portfolio. CSDOC monies invested in accordance with this Policy are divided into two (2) categories: 12.1 Liquid Operating Monies. Funds needed for current operating and capital expenditures are known as Liquid Operating Monies. 12.1.1 The maximum final stated maturity of individual securities in the Liquid Operating Monies account portfolio shall be one (1) year from the date of purchase. 12.1.2 The average duration of the Liquid Operating Monies account portfolio shall be recommended by the Treasurer based on the Districts' cash flow requirements, but may never exceed 180 days, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, and shall be updated as needed. 12.2 Long Term Operating Monies. Funds needed for longer term purposes are known as the Long Term Operating Monies. 12.2.1 The maximum final staled maturity of individual securities in the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall be five (5) years from the date of purchase, unless otherwise authorized by the Districts' Boards of Directors. 12.2.2 The duration of the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall be recommended by the Treasurer based on the Districts' five- year cash flow forecast, shall be reviewed and approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Services Committee, and shall be updated as needed. 12.2.3 The duration of the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall never exceed 120% of the duration as established in accordance with Section 12.2.2. 12.2.4 The duration of the Long Term Operating Monies account portfolio shall never be less than 80% of the duration as established in accordance with Section 12.2.2 Page 10 of 12 13.0 Internal Controls: 13.1 The Treasurer shall establish an annual process of independent review by an external auditor. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures. 14.0 Performance Objectives and Benchmarks: 14.1 Overall objective. The investment portfolio of CSDOC shall be designed with the overall objective of obtaining a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with investment risk constraints and reasonably anticipated cash flow needs. 14.2 The Liquid Operating Monies. The investment performance objective for the Liquid Operating Monies shall be to earn a total rate of return over a market cycle which exceeds the return on a market index approved by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee, and by the Districts' Boards of Directors, when the duration of the portfolio is established. This market index is more fully described in Board Resolution No. 96-79 (see Appendix "B"). _ 14.3 The Long Term Operating Monies. The investment performance objective for the Long Term Operating Monies shall be to earn a total rate of return over a market cycle which exceeds the return on a market index selected by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors, when the duration of the portfolio is established. This market index is more fully described in Board Resolution No. 96-79 (See Appendix"B"). 15.0 Reporting: 15.1 Monthly and quarterly investment reports shall be submitted by the Treasurer to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee which shall forward the reports to the Districts' Boards of Directors. The monthly reports shall be submitted to the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee within 30 days of the end of the month. These reports shall disclose, at a minimum, the following information about the risk characteristics of CSDOC's portfolio: 15.1.1 Cost and accurate and complete market value of the portfolio. 15.1.2 Modified duration of the portfolio compared to Benchmark. 15.1.3 Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a 1% change in interest rates. Page 11 of 12 15.1.4 Percent of portfolio invested in reverse repurchase agreements, and a schedule which matches the maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay them at maturity. 15.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only, the percent of portfolio maturing within 90 days. 15.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality. 15.1.7 Percent of portfolio with credit ratings below "A" by any rating agency, and a description of such securities. 15.1.8 State that all investments are in compliance with this policy and the California Government Code, or provide a listing of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with this policy or with the California Government Code. 15.1.9 Time-weighted total rate of return for the portfolio for the prior three months, twelve months, year to date, and since inception compared to the Benchmark returns for the same periods. 15.1.10 State that sufficient funds are available for CSDOC to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months, or if not, state the reasons for the shortfall. 15.2 CSDOC's Treasurer shall meet quarterly with the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee to review investment performance, proposed strategies and compliance with this investment policy. External investment Advisors may be required to attend said meetings at the discretion of the Chairman of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. 16.0 Investment Policy Adoption and Revision: 16.1 The Investment Policy of CSDOC shall be reviewed by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and shall be adopted by resolution of the Boards of Directors of CSDOC. The Policy shall be reviewed on an annual basis by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee,which shall recommend revisions, as appropriate, to the Boards of Directors. Any modifications made thereto shall be approved by the Boards of Directors. Page 12 of 13 16.2 The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee shall serve as the oversight committee for the Districts' Investment program and shall adopt guidelines for the ongoing review of duration, quality and liquidity of the Districts' portfolio. Page 13 of 13 i APPENDIX i I i j I I I I I I I i - APPENDIX "A" SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT AUTHORIZATION INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL MANAGERS SHORT TERM OPERATING FUND INVESTMENT INTERNAL EXTERNAL U.S. Treasuries OK OK Federal Agencies Fixed coupon, fixed mat. OK Mortgage-backed NO NO Commercial paper OK OK Banker's Accept. OK OK Medium Term Notes Fixed coupon, fixed mat.' OK Mutual Funds Money Market Only" Money Market Only Negotiable CDs Fixed coupon, fixed mat.` OK Municipal Bonds OK" NO LAIF OK NO OCIP OK NO CMOs NO NO Asset-backed NO NO Repurchase Agree. OK OK Reverse Re os OK" OK LONG TERM OPERATING PORTFOLIO INVESTMENT INTERNAL EXTERNAL U.S. Treasuries OK OK Federal Agencies Fixed coupon, fixed mat. OK Mortgage-backed NO OK Mutual Funds Money Market Only" OK Negotiable CDs Fixed coupon, fixed mat.` OK Municipal Bonds OK" OK LAIF OK NO OCIP OK NO CMOs NO With Board Approval Asset-backed NO With Board Approval Repurchase Agree. OK OK Reverse Re os OK' OK "Wdh prior approval of the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee. "Using financial institutions approved by the Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee. H\ MA4'1�IN NEINVMPLW71NVESr.PLY L APPMDIX-B- RESOLUTION NO. 97-27 AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS, AND ADOPTING DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS, AND ADOPTING DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . WHEREAS, on December 8, 1994, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 94-156, appointing the Director of Finance as Treasurer of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California; and, WHEREAS, on September 25, 1996, the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 96-79, readopting the Districts' Investment Policy Statement, and establishing specific performance benchmarks and objectives, together with a schedule of frequency of investment performance reports; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53607, the Boards of Directors may delegate authority to invest and/or reinvest Districts' funds to the Treasurer for a one-year period; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53646, the Districts are required to review their Investment Policy annually and readopt their Policy at a public meeting, which Policy will establish specific performance benchmarks and objectives, and specific monitoring and reports. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the authority of the Boards of Directors to invest or reinvest Districts' surplus funds, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, or to deposit for safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with depositories, as provided for in Califomia Government Code Sections 53608 and 53630, is hereby delegated to the Districts' Treasurer for a one-year period commencing on the date this Resolution is adopted, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53607. Section 2: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Investment Policy Statement of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, as set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following specific performance benchmarks for their two investment funds in accordance with Section 14.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy: LIQUID OPERATING MONIES: The Short-Tenn Operating Fund will be compared to the three month T-Bill rate, and the Callan Active Cash Flow Income Style Group. The Callan Active Cash Flow Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a maximum maturity of one year. LONG-TERM OPERATING MONIES: The Long-Term Operating Fund will be compared to the Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate One-to-Five Year Maturity Index and to the Callan Defensive Fixed Income Style Group. Section 4: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt a performance monitoring and reporting schedule, as required by Section 15.0 of the Districts' Investment Policy, which schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit"B," and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED AND ADOPTED at regular meeting held July 30, 1997. H:\wp.dta\ad min\BS\R ES\97-27.DOC EXHIBIT "B" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING FOR THE DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT PROGRAM POLICY REFERENCE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC REPORTING PARTY* PIMCO MELLON CALLAN 15.1.1 Cost and market value of the portfolio (monthly mark-to-market). M,Q M, Q q 15.12 Modified duration of the portfolio compared to benchmark. M,Q Q 15.1.3 Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a 1% change in interest rate. M,Q q 15.11A Percent of portfolio invested in reverse repurchase agreements,and a schedule which matches the m iturfly of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash Flows which are available to repay them at mat M,Q 15.1.5 For the Liquid Operating Monies account only,the percent of portfolio maturing within 90 days. M,Q Q 15.1.6 Average portfolio credit quality. M,Q Q 15.1.7 Percent of portfolio with credit ratings below A"by any rating agency,and a description of such securilies. M,Q Q 15.1.8 Listing of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with this policy or with the California Government Cade. M,Q 15.1.9 Time-weighted total rate of return for the portfolio for the prior three months,twelve months,year-to- date,and since Inception compared to the benchmark returns for the same periods. M. Q Q ADDL'" Comparison of portfolio performance to market index benchmark. M,O Q ADDL'" Comparison of Manager's performance to peer group benchmark. Q ADDL" Monitoring of organizational and structural changes of investment management firm. Q ADDL" Audit portfolios for compliance with Investment policy guidelines. Q 15.1.10 CSDOC will report If sufficient funds are available for it to meet operating expenditure requirements for the next six months,or if not,state the reasons r the shortfall. Notes •M=Monthly Q=Quarterly APPENDIX Section 53600 of the California Government Code Introduction A requirement of Section 8,Authorized and Suitable Investments,of the Districts'Investment Policy Statement, is that all investments shall be made in accordance with Section 53600 et seq. of the California Government Code. This section presents a copy of Section 53600,Investment of Surplus, for the reader's reference. Investment of S=lus Sec. 53600. Local agency, definition As used in this article, 'local agency" means county, city city and county, including a char- tered city or county, school district, community college district, public district, county board of education, county superintendent of schools, or any public or municipal corporation. (Added by Stats.1949,c.81,p.289,Sec. 1;Stats.1984,c. 124,Sec.2; Stats. 1984,c. 1226,Sec. 1; Stats.1987, c. 887, Sec. 2.) Sec. 53600.3. Prudent investor standard; investments on behalf of local agencies Governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds pursuant to this chapter are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When investing, reinvesting, pur- chasing,acquiring,exchanging,selling,and managing public funds,a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person Page 1 of 8 acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like alms, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency. Within the limitations of this section and considering individual investments as pan to an overall strategy, a trustee is authorized to acquire investments as authorized by low. (Added by Stats.1995, c. 784 (S.B.866), Sec. 11.) Sec. 53600.5. Objectives; managing public funds When investing,reinvesting,purchasing,acquiring,exchanging,selling,and managing public funds, the primary objective of a trustee shall be to safeguard the principal of the funds under its control. The secondary objective shall be to meet the liquidity needs of the depositor. The third objective shall be to achieve a return on the funds under its control. (Added by Stots.1995, C. 784 (S.B.866), Sec. 12.) Sec. 53600.6. Legislative findings and declarations; solvency and creditworthiness The Legislature hereby finds that the solvency and creditworthiness of each individual local agency can impact the solvency and creditworthiness of the state and other local agencies within the state. Therefore,to protect the solvency and creditworthiness of the state and all of Its political subdivisions, the Legislature hereby declares that the deposit and investment of public funds by local officials and local agencies is an issue of statewide concern. (Added by Stats.1995, C. 784 (S.B.866), Sec. 13.) Sec. 53601. Authorized investments; circumstances The legislative body of a local agency having money in a sinking fund of, or surplus money in, its treasury not required for the immediate necessities of the local agency may invest any portion of the money that it deems wise or expedient in those investments set forth below. A local agency purchasing or obtaining any securities prescribed in this section, in a negotiable,bearer, registered, or nonregistered format,_shall require delivery of the securities to the local agency, including those purchased for the agency by financial advisors, consultants, or managers using the agency's funds, by book entry, physical delivery, or by third party custodial agreement. The transfer of securities to the counterpart bank's customer book entry account may be used for book entry delivery. For purposes of this section "counterparty" means the other party to the transaction. A counterpart bank's trust department or separate safekeeping department may be used for the physical delivery of the security if the security is held in the name of the local agency. Where this section does not specify a limitation on the term or remaining maturity at the time of the investment, no investment shall be made in any security, other than a security underlying a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement authorized by this section, that at the time of the investment has a term remaining to maturity in excess of five years, unless the legislative body has granted express authority to make that investment either specifically or as a part of an invest- ment program approved by the legislative body no less than three months prior to the invest. ment: (a) Bonds issued by the local agency, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the local agency. (b) United States Treasury notes,bonds,bills,of certificates of indebtedness,or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. (c) Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this state, including bonds pay- able solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled,or operated by the state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the state. Page 2 of 8 (d) Bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of any local agency within this state, Including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency,or by a department,board, agency, or author- ity of the local agency. (e) Obligations issued by banks for cooperatives, federal land banks, federal intermediate credit banks, federal home loan banks, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, or in obligations, participations, or other Instruments of, or issued by, or fully guaran- teed as to principal and interest by,the Federal National Mortgage Association; or in guaranteed portions of Small Business Administration notes; or in obligations, participations,or other instru- ments of, or issued by, a federal agency or a United States government-sponsored enterprise. (f) Bills of exchange or time drafts drown on and accepted by a commercial bank,otherwise known as bankers acceptances. Purchases of bankers acceptances may not exceed 270 days ma- turity or 40 percent of the agency's surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this section. However, no more than 30 percent of the agency's surplus funds may be invested in the bankers acceptances of any one commercial bank pursuant to this section. This subdivision does not preclude a municipal utility district from investing any surplus money in its treasury in any manner authorized by the Municipal Utility District Act (Division 6 (com- mencing with Section 11501) of the Public Utilities Code). (g) Commercial paper of"prime" quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and numerical rating as provided for by Moody's Investors Service,Inc.,or Standard and Poor's Corpo- ration. Eligible paper is further limited to issuing corporations that are organized and operating within the United States and having total assets in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) and having an "A" or higher rating for the issuer's debt, other than commercial paper, if any, as provided for by Moody's Investors Service, Inc., or Standard and Poor's Corpora- tion. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 180 days maturity nor represent more than 10 percent of the outstanding paper of an issuing corporation. Purchases of commer- cial paper may not exceed 15 percent of the agency's surplus money that may be invested pursu- ant to this section. An additional 15 percent, or a total of 30 percent of the agency's surplus money, may be invested pursuant to this subdivision. The additional 15 percent may be so in- vested only if the dollar-weighted average maturity of the entire amount does not exceed 31 days. "Dollar-weighted average maturity"means the sum of the amount of each outstanding commer- cial paper investment multiplied by the number of days to maturity, divided by the total amount of outstanding commercial paper. (h) Negotiable certificates of deposits issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank or a state or federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code) or by a state-li- censed branch of a foreign bank. Purchases of negotiable certificates of deposit may not exceed 30 percent of the agency's surplus money which may be invested pursuant to this section. For purposes of this section,negotiable certificates of deposits do not come within Article 2(commenc- ing with Section 53630), except that the amount so invested shall be subject to the limitations of Section 53638. (1) (1) Investments in repurchase agreements or reverse repurchase agreements of any se- curities authorized by this section, as long as the agreements are subject to this subdivision, including,the delivery requirements specified in this section. (2) investments in repurchase agreements may be made, on any investment autho- rized in this section, when the term of the agreement does not exceed one year. The market value of securities that underlay a repurchase agreement shall be valued at 102 percent or greater of the funds borrowed against those securities and the value shall be adjusted no less than quarterly. Page 3 of 8 (3) Reverse repurchase agreements may be utilized only when either of the following conditions are met: (A) The security was owned or specifically committed to purchase, by the local agency, prior to December 31, 1994, and was sold using a reverse repurchase agreement on December 31, 1994. (B) The security to be sold on reverse repurchase agreement has been owned and fully paid for by the local agency for a minimum of 30 days prior to sale; the total of all reverse repurchase agreements on investments owned by the local agency not purchased or committed to purchase, prior to December 31, 1994,does not exceed 20 percent of the base value of the portfolio; and the agreement does not exceed a term of 92 days, unless the agreement Includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement and the final maturity date of the same security. . (4) After December 31, 1994, a reverse repurchase agreement may not be entered into with securities not sold on a reverse repurchase agreement and purchased, or committed to purchase, prior to that date, as a means of financing or paying for the security sold on a reverse repurchase agreement,but may only be entered into with securities owned and previ- ously paid for for a minimum of 30 days prior to the settlement of the reverse repurchase agreement,in order to supplement the yield on securities owned and previously paid for or to provide funds for the immediate payment of a local agency obligation. Funds obtained or funds within the pool of an equivalent amount to that obtained from selling a security to a counterparty by way of a reverse repurchase agreement, on securities originally purchased subsequent to December 31, 1994,shall not be used to purchase another security with a ma- turity longer than 92 days from the Initial settlement date of the reverse repurchase ogree- ment, unless the reverse repurchase agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement and the final maturity date of the some security. Reverse repurchase agreements specified in subparagraph(B)of paragraph(3)may not be entered into unless the percentage restrictions specified in that subparagraph are met, including the total of any reverse repurchase agreements specified in subparagraph (A)of paragraph (3). (5) Investments in reverse repurchase agreements or similar investments in which the local agency sells securities prior to purchase, may only be made upon prior approval of the governing body of the local agency. (6) (A) "Repurchase agreement" means a purchase of securities by the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the counterparty seller will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date and for a specified amount and the counterporty,will deliver the underlying securities to the local agency by book entry, physical delivery, or by third party custodial agreement. The transfer of underlying securities to the counterparty bank's customer book-entry account may be used for book-entry delivery. (B) "Securities,"for purpose of repurchase under this subdivision,means securities of the same issuer, description, issue date, and maturity. (C) "Reverse repurchose agreement" means a sale of securities by the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the local agency will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date and includes other comparable agreements. (D) For purposes of this section, the base value of the local agency's pool portfolio shall be that dollar amount obtained by totaling all cash balances placed in the pool by all pool participants, excluding any amounts obtained through selling securities by way of reverse repurchase agreements or other similar borrowing methods. Page 4 of 8 (E) For purposes of this section, the spread is the difference between the cost of funds obtained using the reverse repurchase agreement and the earnings obtained on the reinvestment of the funds. (F) Repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements shall only be made with primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. (1) Medium-term notes of a maximum of five years maturity issued by corporations orga- nized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. Notes eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated in.o rating category of"A" or its equivalent or better by a notion- ally recognized rating service. Purchases of medium-term notes may not exceed 30 percent of the agency's surplus money which may be invested pursuant to this section. (k) Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies investing in the securities and obligations as authorized by subdivisions(a)to(1),inclusive,of this section and that comply with the investment restrictions of this article and Article 2 (commencing with Sec- tion 53630). To be eligible for investment pursuant to this subdivision, these companies shall either. (1) Attain the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two of the three largest nationally recognized rating services. (2) Retain an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commis- sion with not less than five years' experience investing in the securities and obligations as authorized by subdivisions(a)to(m),inclusive,and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). The purchase price of shares of beneficial interest purchased pursuant to this subdivision shall not include any commission that these companies may charge and shall not exceed 15 percent of the agency's surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this section. 0) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this section, Section 53635, or any other provision of law,moneys held by a trustee or fiscal agent and pledged to the payment or security of bonds or other indebtedness, or obligations under a lease, installment sale, or other agreement of a local agency, or certificates of participation in those bonds,indebtedness, or lease installment sale, or other agreements, may be invested in accordance with the statutory provi- sions governing the issuance of those bonds, indebtedness, or lease installment sale, or other agreement, or to the extent not inconsistent therewith or if there are no specific statutory provi- sions, in accordance with the ordinance, resolution, indenture, or agreement of the local agency providing for the issuance. (m) Notes, bonds, or other obligations that are at all times secured by a valid first priority security interest in securities of the types listed by Section 53651 as eligible securities for the pur- pose of securing local agency deposits having a market value at least equal to that required by- Section 53652 for the purpose of securing local agency deposits. The securities serving as collat- eral shall be placed by delivery or book entry into the custody of a trust company or the bust department of a bank which is not affiliated with the issuer of the secured obligation, and the security interest shall be perfected in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Commer- cial Code or federal regulations applicable to the types of securities in which the security interest is granted. (n) Any mortgage pass-through security,collateralized mortgage obligation,mortgage-backed or other pay-through bond,equipment lease-backed certificate,consumer receivable pass-through certificate, or consumer receivable-backed bond of a maximum of five years maturity. Securities eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be issued by an issuer having an"A"or higher Page 5 of 8 rating for the Issuer's debt as provided by a nationally recognized rating service and rated in a rating category of"AA"or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service. Pur. chase of securities authorized by this subdivision may not exceed 20 percent of the agency's sur. plus money that may be invested pursuant to this section. 1983 Main Volume: (Added by Stats.1949, c. 81, p. 289, Sec. 1. Amended by Stats.1951, c. 1643, p. 3697, Sec. 1; Stats.1953, c. 537, p. 1798, Sec. 2; Stats.1954, Fx.Sess., C. 10, P. 257, Sec. 1; Stats.1967, c.275,p. 1433,Sec. 1; Stats.1967,c. 1316,p.3140,Sec.2; Stats.1974, c. 1354, p.2938, Sec. 1; Stats.1975, c. 649, p. 1406, Sec. 1; Stats.1977, c. 1138, p. 3657, Sec. 1.5; Stats.1978, c. 65, p. 181, Sec. 1; Stats.1979, c. 158, p. 354, Sec. 1; Stats.1979, c. 275, p. 942, Sec. 2.5; Stats.1981, c. 185, Sec. 2; Stats.1982, c. 508, Sec. 2.) 1996 Pocket Part: (Amended by Stats.1983,c.550,Sec.1; Stats.1983,c.567,Sec. 1.5; Stats.1984, c. 659, Sec. 2; Stats.1984, c. 741,Sec. 1; Stats.1985, c.983, Sec. 14, eff.Sept.26, 1985; Stats.1985, c. 983,Sec. 15, eft.Sept. 26, 1985,operative Jan. 1, 1988; Stats.1985,c. 1526,Sec. 1; Stats.1985, c. 1526, Sec. 1.5, operative Jan. 1, 1988; Stats.1986, C. 784, Sec. 1; Stats.1986, c. 784, Sec. 2, opera- tive Jan. 1, 1988; Stats.1986, c. 853,Sec. 1,eff. Sept. 17, 1986; Stots.1986, c. 853,Sec.2, operative Jan. 1, 1987; Stats.1986, c. 853, Sec. 1.5; Stats.1986, c. 853, Sec. 2.5, operative Jan. 1, 1988; Stats.1987, c. 446, Sec. 1; Stats.1987, c. 887, Sec. 3.5; Stats.1988, c. 294, Sec. 1, elf. July 7, 1988; Stats.1988, c. 491, Sec 1; Stats.1992, c. 173 (A.B.3576), Sec 1; Stats.1994, c. 705 (S.B.1804), Sec. 10; Stats.1995, C. 784 (S.B.866), Sec. 14.) Sec. 53601.1. Investment in financial futures or financial option contracts The authority of a local agency to invest funds pursuant to Section 53601 includes,in addition thereto, authority to invest in financial futures or financial option contracts in any of the Invest- ment categories enumerated in that section. (Added by Stats.1983, c. 534, Sec. 3.) Sec. 53601.5. Investments; qualified purchase agent The purchase by a local agency of any investment authorized pursuant to Section 53601 or 53601.1, not purchased directly from the issuer, shall be purchased either from an institution licensed by the state as a broker-dealer, as defined in Section 25004 of the Corporations Code, or from a member of a federally regulated securities exchange, from a national or state-chartered bank, from a federal or state association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code) or from a brokerage firm designated as a primary government dealer by the Federal Reserve bank. (Added by Stats.1984, c.929,Sec. 1. Amended by Stats.1985,c. 983,Sec 16,eff.Sept.26, 1985.) Sec. 53601.6. Prohibited investments (a) A local agency shall not invest any funds pursuant to this article in inverse floaters, range notes, or interest-only strips that are derived from a pool of mortgages. (b) A local agency shall not invest any funds pursuant to this article in any security that could result in zero interest accrual if held to maturity. However,a local agency may hold prohib- ited instruments until their maturity dates. The limitation in this subdivision shall not apply to local agency investments in shares of beneficial interest Issued by diversified management com- panies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. Sec. 80a-1, and follow- ing) that are authorized for investment pursuant to subdivision (k) of Section 53601. (Added by Stats.1995, c. 784 (S.B.866), Sec. 15.) Page 6 of 8 Sec. 53602. Investment in legal investments for savings banks; securities of public districts The legislative body shall invest only in notes, bonds, bills, certificates of indebtedness, war- rants, or registered warrants which are legal investments for savings banks in the State,provided, that the board of supervisors of a county may, by a four-fifths vote thereof, invest in notes, war- rants or other evidences of indebtedness of public districts wholly or partly within the county, whether or not such notes,warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness are legal investments for savings banks. (Added by Stats.1949, c. 81, p. 289, Sec. 1. Amended by Stats.1953, c. 537, p. 1799, Sec. 3; Stats.1954, 1st Fx.Sess., c. 10, p. 257, Sec. 2.) . Sec. 53603. Direct purchase of securities The legislative body may make the investment by direct purchase of any issue of eligible securities at their original sale or after they have been issued. (Added by Stats.1949, c. 81, p. 289, Sec. 1. Amended by Stats.1953, c. 537, p. 1799,Sec.4.) Sec. 53604. Sale or exchange of securities, reinvestment of proceeds The legislative body may sell, or exchange for other eligible securities, and reinvest the pro- ceeds of,the securities purchased. . (Added by Stats.1949, c. 81, p. 289, Sec. 1. Amended by Stats.1953, c. 537, p. 1799, Sec.5.) Sec. 53605. Sale of securities, application of proceeds to original purposes From time to time, the legislative body shall sell the securities so that the proceeds may be applied to the purposes for which the original purchase money was placed in the sinking fund or the treasury of the local agency. (Added by Stats.1949, c. 91, p. 289, Sec. 1. Amended by Stats.1953, c. 537, p. 1799, Sec. 6.) Sec. 53606. Bonds issued by purchaser, cancellation, resale The bonds purchased,which were issued by the purchaser,may be canceled either in satisfac- tion of sinking fund obligations or otherwise. When canceled, they are no longer outstanding, unless in its discretion, the legislative body holds them uncanceled. While held uncanceled, the bonds may be resold. (Added by Stats.1949, c. 81, p. 299,Sec. 1.) Sec. 53607. Delegation of duties to treasurer; monthly report The authority of the legislative body to invest or to reinvest funds of a local agency,or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, may be delegated by the legislative body to the treasurer of the local agency, who shall thereafter assume full responsibility for such transactions until such time as the delegation of authority is revoked,and shall make a monthly report of such transactions to the legislative body. (Added by Stats.1957, c. 220, p. 882, Sec. 1.) Sec. 53608. Deposit of securities; receipt; delegation of authority The legislative body of a local agency may deposit for safekeeping with a federal or state association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a trust company or a state or Page 7 of 8 national bank located within this state or with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or any branch thereof within this state, or with any Federal Reserve bank or with any state or national bank located in any city designated as a reserve city by Me Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the bonds, notes, bills, debentures, obligations, certificates of indebtedness, war- rants, or other evidences of indebtedness in which the money of the local agency is invested pur- suant to this article or pursuant to other legislative authority. The local agency shall take from such financial institution a receipt for securities so deposited. The authority of the legislative body to deposit for safekeeping may be delegated by the legislative body to the treasurer of the local agency; the treasurer shall not be responsible for securities delivered to and receipted for by a financial institution until they are withdrawn from the financial institution by the treasurer. (Added by Stats.1959,c. 1392,p.3670, Sec. 1. Amended by Stats.1967, c.582, p. 1928, Sec. 1; Stats.1980, c. 689, p. 2080, Sec. 1; Stats.1985, c. 983, Sec. 17, eff. Sept. 26, 1985.) Sec. 53609. Eligible securities for investment of funds held by local agency pursuant to deferred compensation plans Notwithstanding the provisions of this chapter or any other provisions of this code, funds held by a local agency pursuant to a written agreement between the agency and employees of the agency to defer a portion of the compensation otherwise receivable by the agency's employees and pursuant to a plan for such deferral as adopted by the governing body of the agency,may be invested in the types of investments set forth in Sections 53601 and 53602 of this code, and may additionally be invested in corporate stocks,bonds, and securities, mutual funds,savings and loan accounts, credit union accounts, life insurance policies, annuities, mortgages, deeds of tout, or other security interests in real or personal property. Nothing herein shall be construed to permit any type of investment prohibited by the Constitution. - Deferred compensation funds are public pension or retirement funds for the purposes of Sec- tion 17 of Article XVi of the Constitution. (Added by Stats.1971, c. 1629, p. 3511, Sec. 2. Amended by Stats.1972, c. 1370, p. 2736, Sec. 12; Stats.1974, c. 544, p. 1254, Sec. 26; Stats.1975, c. 822, p. 1874, Sec. 1; Stats.1979, C. 373, p. 1320, Sec. 162.) Page 8 of 8 r I APPENDIX "D" I I I I I I i I APPENDIX "D" GLOSSARY OF INVESTMENT TERMS Agencies. Shorthand market terminology for any obligation issued by a government- sponsored entity(GSE), or a federally related institution. Obligations of GSEs are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government. There are eight GSEs, five of which are currently active in the new issue market. The five include: FFCB. The Federal Farm Credit Bank System provides credit and liquidity in the agricultural industry. FFCB issues discount notes and bonds. FHLB. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLB issues discount notes and bonds. FHLMC. Like FHLB, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation provides credit and liquidity in the housing market. FHLMC, also called "FreddieMac" issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage pass-through securities. FNMA. Like FHLB and FreddieMac, the Federal National Mortgage Association was established to provide credit and liquidity in the housing market. FNMA, also known as "FannieMae," issues discount notes, bonds and mortgage pass- through securities. SLMA. The student loan marketing association, also known as "SallieMae," provides liquidity to private lenders who make various types of loans for education. SLMA currently issues floating rate notes. Federally related institutions are arms of the federal government. Most do not issue securities directly into the market. Those which do issue directly include the following: GNMA. The Government National Mortgage Association, known as "GinnieMae," issues mortgage pass-through securities which are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US Government. PEFCO. The Private Export Funding corporation assists exporters. Obligations of PEFCO are not guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US government. TVA. The Tennessee Valley Authority provides flood control and power and promotes development in portions of the Tennessee, Ohio and Mississippi River valleys. TVA currently issues discount notes and bonds. Page t of 7 Amortized Cost. Measure of the cost of a security whereby the cost value will change over time as the discount or premium paid for the security is gradually incorporated into the principal value as interest payments are received. Asked. The price at which a seller offers to sell a security. Asset-backed securities. Securities collateralized with consumer receivables, such as automobile loans, credit card receivables, or home equity loans, which are owned by the issuer, but placed with a trustee for the benefit of the investor. Average life. In mortgage-related investments, including CMOs, the average time to expected receipt of principal payments, weighted by the amount of principal expected. Banker's acceptance. A money market instrument created to facilitate international trade transactions. It is highly liquid and safe because the risk of the trade transaction is transferred to the bank which "accepts" the obligation to pay the investor. Benchmark. A comparison security or portfolio. A performance benchmark is a partial market index which reflects the mix of securities allowed under a specific investment policy. Bid. The price at which a buyer offers to buy a security. Broker. A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a transaction for which the broker receives a commission. A broker does not sell securities from his own position. Bullet structure. A portfolio strategy in which a manager overweights both the short and long end of the yield curve, and underweights the middle part of the curve. Certificate of Deposit (CD). A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large denomination CDs may be marketable. Collateral. Securities or cash pledged by a borrower to secure repayment of a loan or repurchase agreement. Also, securities pledged by a financial institution to secure deposits of public moneys. Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMO). Classes of bonds which redistribute the cash flows of mortgage securities (and whole loans) to create securities which have different levels of prepayment risk, as compared to the underlying mortgage securities. Commercial paper. The short-term unsecured debt of corporations. Page 2 of 7 Conditional prepayment rate (CPR). A measure of mortgage prepayment activity. It assumes that a constant fraction of the principal prepays each month and is based on the previous month's remaining balance. The rate is expressed as an annualized percentage. For instance, a CPR of 6% indicates that each month 6% of the remaining principal balance prepays on an annualized basis. Convexity. The rate of change in a bond's price as duration changes. It is a particularly important component of price change for longer term bonds, or for large changes in interest rates. Cost Yield. The annual income from an investment divided by the purchase cost. Because it does not give effect to premiums and discounts which may have been included in the purchase cost, it is an incomplete measure of return. Coupon. The rate at which a bond pays interest. Credit risk. The risk that principal and/or interest on an investment will not be paid in a timely manner due to changes in the condition of the issuer. Current yield. The annual income from an investment divided by the current market value. Since the mathematical calculation relies on the current market value rather than the investor's cost, current yield is unrelated to the actual return the investor will earn if the security is held to maturity. Dealer. A dealer acts as a principal in security transactions, selling securities from and buying securities for his own position. Debenture. A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. Derivative. Any security that has principal and/or interest payments which are subject to uncertainty (but not for reasons of default or credit risk) as to timing and/or amount, or any security which represents a component of another security which has been separated from other components ("Stripped" coupons and principal). A derivative is also defined as a financial instrument the value of which is totally or partially derived from the value of another instrument, interest rate or index. Discount. The difference between the par value of a bond and the cost of the bond, when the cost is below par. Some short-term securities, such as Tbills and banker's acceptances, are known as discount securities. They sell at a discount from par, and return the par value to the investor at maturity without additional interest. Other securities, which have fixed coupons trade at a discount when the coupon rate is lower than the current market rate for securities of that maturity and/or quality. Page 3 of 7 Diversification. Dividing investment funds among a variety of investments to avoid excessive exposure to any one source of risk. Duration. The weighted average time to maturity of a bond where the weights are the present values of the future cash flows. Duration measures the price sensitivity of a bond to changes in interest rates. (See modified duration and effective duration). Effective duration. Measures the price volatility of a fixed income security that contains embedded options. A more accurate measure of price volatility when the cash flow characteristics of the bond change when interest rates shift. Federal funds rate. The rate of interest charged by banks for short term loans to other banks. It is established by the Federal Reserve Bank through open-market operations. Federal Open Market Committee. A committee of the Federal Reserve Board which establishes monetary policy and executes it through temporary and permanent changes to the supply of bank reserves. Ladder structure. A portfolio strategy in which a manager attempts to weight securities equally across the yield curve. Leverage. Borrowing funds in order to invest in securities which have the potential to pay earnings at a rate higher than the cost of borrowing. Liquidity. The speed and ease with which an asset can be converted to cash. Market risk. The risk that the value of securities will fluctuate with changes in overall market conditions or interest rates. Market value. The price at which a security can be traded. Marking to market. The process of posting current market values for securities in a portfolio. Maturity. The final date upon which the principal of a security becomes due and payable. Medium term note. A corporate bond which is brought to market over a period of time rather than at a single offering. Generally issued as senior unsecured obligations of the borrower. Page 4 of 7 Modified duration. Measures the percentage price volatility of a fixed income security or portfolio. Modified duration approximates the change in price for small changes in interest rates, assuming that the cash flow characteristics do not change when the yield curve shifts. Money market. The market in which short term debt instruments (Tbills, discount notes, commercial paper and banker's acceptances) are issued and traded. Mortgage Pass Through Securities. Securities collateralized with residential mortgage loans, the principal and interest payments of which are distributed, or "passed-through" to the investor. Many of these securities are issued by agencies of the federal government, including GNMA and FHLMC. Mutual fund. An entity which pools the funds of investors and invests those funds in a set of securities which is specifically defined in the fund's prospectus. Mutual funds can be invested in various types of domestic and/or international stocks, bonds and money market instruments, as set forth in the individual fund's prospectus. For most large, institutional investors, the costs associated with investing in mutual funds are higher than the investor can obtain through an individually managed portfolio. Negative convexity. A phenomenon associated with bonds which have embedded call options, it measures the rate at which duration of a callable bond gets smaller as interest rates fall. Negative convexity is an undesirable characteristics in bonds. PSA Standard Prepayment Model (PSA). A measure of mortgage prepayment activity. The model is expressed as a monthly series of annual prepayment rates. The series begins at .2% per year in the first month, and increases by .2% per year in each successive month until month 30, where it levels out at 6% per year until maturity. This series is labeled 100 PSA. 200 PSA doubles this series, and 50 PSA would cut the series in half. Option adjusted spread. A measure of the value of a bond relative to a benchmark security, which takes into account the value of the embedded option inherent in any bond that has uncertain cash flows (i.e., callable bonds). Premium. The difference between the par value of a bond and the market value of the bond, when the market value is above par. Prepayment speed. A measure of how quickly principal is repaid to investors in mortgage securities. Prepayment window. The time period over which principal repayments will be received on mortgage securities at a specified prepayment speed. Page 5 of 7 Prudent man (person) rule. A standard of responsibility which applies to fiduciaries. In California, the rule is stated as "Investments shall be managed with the care, skill, prudence and diligence, under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person, acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters, would use in the conduct of an enterprise of like character and with like aims to accomplish similar purposes." Realized return. The change in value of the portfolio due to interest received and interest earned and realized gains and losses. It does not give effect to changes in market value on securities which have not been sold from the portfolio. Repurchase agreement (RP, Repo). Short term purchases of securities with a simultaneous agreement to sell the securities back at a higher price. From the seller's point of view, the same transaction is a reverse repurchase agreement. Safekeeping. A service to bank customers whereby securities are held by the bank In the customer's name. Scenario analysis. A portfolio management technique that measures the performance of the portfolio under varying scenarios including, but not limited to, interest rate movements, spread changes and nonparallel yield curve shifts. Structured note. A complex, fixed income instrument which pays interest based on a formula tied to other interest rates, commodities or indices. Examples include inverse floating rate notes which have coupons that increase when other interest rates are falling, and which fall when other interest rates are rising, and "dual index floaters," which pay interest based on the relationship between two other interest rates -for example, the yield on the ten-year Treasury note minus the Libor rate. Issuers of such notes lock in a reduced cost of borrowing by purchasing interest rate swap agreements. Total rate of return. A measure of a portfolio' performance over time. It is the internal rate of return which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending value, and includes interest earnings and realized and unrealized gains and losses on the portfolio. U.S. Treasury obligations. Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Treasuries are considered to have no credit risk, and are the benchmark for interest rates on all other securities in the US and overseas. The Treasury issues both discounted securities and fixed coupon notes and bonds. Treasury bills. All securities issued with initial maturities of one year or less are issued as discounted instruments, and are called Treasury bills. The Treasury currently issues three- and six-month Tbills at regular weekly auctions. It also issues "cash management" bills as needed to smooth out cash flows. Page 6 of 7 Treasury notes. All securities issued with initial maturities of two to ten years are called Treasury notes, and pay interest semi-annually. Treasury bonds. All securities issued with initial maturities greater than ten years are called Treasury bonds. Like Treasury notes, they pay interest semi- annually. Volatility. The rate at which security prices change with changes in general economic conditions or the general level of interest rates. Yield to Maturity (YTM). The annualized internal rate of return on an investment which equates the expected cash flows from the investment to its cost. Yield to maturity (at market). The discount rate that equates the present value of the promised cash flow (interest payments and redemption value)to the market price, assuming that all cash flows are invested at the YTM rate. Yield to maturity (at purchase cost). The YTM that equates to the purchase price of the security Page 7 of 7 Fe,Ed a-.D=e 00 AGENDA ❑ COMM INFO.REM n ❑ CONIM1 ACTION ITEM ITEM ❑ Jr.EDS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT.BDS.MCUSSION (NON, SNSENT) ❑ USIIS HEARING 9 Jr.DOS.MEETING DATE i Xr.SDS.AGENOAITEMNO. MEETING DATE COMM.to,NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMITS (Odginator) PDC POC FAHR:719197 FAHR 9 7-5g ALL 2210, Gary G. Streed,2500 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER DMsian No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wordina: AUTHORIZE STAFF TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH R. W. BECK TO DEVELOP ASSUMPTIONS AND STRATEGIES TO IMPLEMENT A REPLACEMENT FUND FOR FIXED ASSETS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED$75,000 (All Districts) Recommended Action(s): 1. That the Directors authorize staff to negotiate an agreement with R. W. Beck to develop assumptions and strategies to implement a Replacement Fund for fixed assets for an amount not to exceed $75,000. CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Dale Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Appmved an_and Notice of Determination riled on_ CURRENT BUDGETICOST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES Rem B„da.t plus Tnmi.,$) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ $200,000 N/A NIA $200,000 SOURCE: CORF Schedule i-ine Items: Strategic Plan AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Une Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget:: 199E-97 $470,000.00 $11,000.00 $0.00 $481,000.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: 199597 THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $75,000.00 $75,000.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES If VES,Made rum., _PemnaneM Lim9ed Term If VES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section It.,:.d 05MMIR Page 1 of 2 H:\W P.DTATIN(?210tCRANEIFAHRIFAHR.9NULYIFAHR97.53 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMn-rEE AGENDA(La): 1. Originator Date 9 CONCURRENCES: Signature Date � ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) 1. Sig ature Date Department Head(Or Designee) Signature Dale Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) During the User Fee and Budget adoption processes, several Directors requested a formal review of the Districts' accumulated funds and reserves policies. At the May FAHR Committee meeting, staff reported that the Strategic Plan consultants had agreed to accelerate the Financial Plan portion of their work at no additional Cost. As part of the Strategic Plan, the mix of pay-as-you-go and debt financing would be evaluated as well as the accumulated funds and reserves policies of other agencies. The FAHR Committee directed staff to add to the scope an analysis of assumptions and strategies to develop a replacement reserve for fixed assets. Originally, staff believed we had sufficient information available to proceed in- house. However, after review of the scope of work and the work product obtained by IRWD earlier this year, we have determined we would get a better, more solid report from a Consultant. Staff has contacted the firm that was selected by IRWD after a Competitive process and held preliminary discussions as to scope, scheduling, and compensation. A firm proposal can be negotiated later this month after a site visit to review records and availability of other information. However, initial discussions indicate the project can be completed by October 1997, at a cost not to exceed $75,000. The scope of work would include preparing an inventory of existing fired assets in the collection, treatment, disposal and general facilities; reviewing the nature and extent of facilities to be constructed through system build-out; developing replacement costs and schedules; developing a computerized spreadsheet model; and preparing a final report. Timing of this project is very important as the accumulated funds and reserves policy will be critical for our rate- setting process and for future debt financing. The firm of R. W. Beck has experience with the type of project we are expecting, has experience with the local environmental impacts on sewers and facilities, and has experience with the Orange County attitude toward fees and reserves. Recommendation Staff recommends authorization to negotiate an agreement with R. W. Beck to develop assumptions and strategies to implement a Replacement Fund for fixed assets for an amount not to exceed $75,000. GGS:lc c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager ae.awosnaar Page 2 of 2 HAWPOTATIM221 MC RANETAH R1fAHR.97WLY A R97.53 n 0 May 14, 1997 ---- Accumulated Funds Pot icy From 1996-97 Budaet As a part of the"2020 Vision" Master Plan, the Five-Year Financial Plan and subsequent financial planning sessions, the Directors have developed a comprehensive policy regarding reserves accumulated funds. The levels and purposes are described as follows: • General Liability: In 1979, the Directors established a Self-Insurance Fund for liability insurance and a reserve of$250,000. The fund was designed to self-insure for basic small claims, and to purchase excess-loss insurance for larger claims. Each year an in-lieu premium would be paid and any excess would accumulate in the reserves. In 1986, the Directors decided to become completely self-insured and not purchase any liability insurance. However, in 1996 the Directors voted to limit the Districts' self-insurance exposure to $100,000 and acquired excess public liability insurance of$25 million at a cost of$115,000 annually. A goal of$2.5 million has been established for this fund. • Operating Fund General or Dry Period Funds: The principal revenue stream of the Operating Funds follows the County of Orange Tax Collection and apportionment schedule as the Sanitary Sewer Service Fee is collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill. Since the first major apportionment is scheduled for late November, the first five or six months of operating costs must be paid from funds on hand. For this reason, "Dry-Period Funds"of 50 percent of the current year's operating budget have been established. The goal for these funds is approximately$30 million. _ • Operating Fund Contingency Funds: The Sanitary Sewer Service Fee Can only be assessed once each year. The fee is Collected on the County property tax bill to minimize Collection Costs and delinquencies, but Cannot be changed after the tax bills are mailed. Since a District Cannot generate any additional revenues at mid-year, a Contingency has been added to the budgetary requirement. This requirement has been established at 20 percent of the annual operating expense, or approximately$12 million. • Capital Projects Funds: Funds for capital improvement projects, estimated to exceed $1.5 billion by the year 2020, come from connection fees, savings and borrowing. Because the capital improvement program is master-planned to meet federal and state environmental regulatory requirements and additional capacity needs, projects must be started and Completed on a schedule. While the "2020 Vision"Master Plan proposed a 50:50 mix of construction funds from pay-as-you-go and borrowing, the financial markets may not be optimal for a debt issue when construction funds are needed. In order to provide for cycles in the financial market, Capital Projects Funds equal to one year's estimated Capital outlay has been established. The current goal is $50 million, but was $100 million when the policy was adopted. • Environmental Requirement Funds: An Environmental Requirement Fund has been established at 10 percent of one years estimated capital outlay program to provide for contingency capital funding for unforeseen or quick-breaking environmental requirements on projects to improve the quality of the air, ocean, or the land. Current plans are to have $5 million in this fund. CSDOC • P.O.Box 8127 6 Fountain Valley.CA 9272a.8127 0 (714)962-2411 Accumulated Funds Policy FY 96-97 Page 2 May 14, 1997 • Earthquake and Flood Damage Reserve: The current replacement value of the Districts' sewerage system is estimated to be approximately$1.5 billion. The two treatment plants are adjacent to the Santa Ana River and near the Newport-Inglewood Fault. Although our facilities are designed and built to the highest seismic standards, property insurance is very expensive and difficult to obtain. The 1995-97 property insurance premium for excess loss is estimated at $1.37 million for$200 million of all-risk insurance, but only$30 million of earthquake coverage. Because of the minimal amount of cost-effective insurance available, an Earthquake and Flood Reserve of$100 million has been established. This is aproximately equal to 10% of fixed asset value at cost. • Debt Service Reserves: A condition of some Certificate of Participation (COP) issues is that a reserve be established to guarantee some future payments. Required Debt Service Reserves, under the control of the Trustees, are approximately $32 million. • Debt Service Dry Period Funds: The main revenue source for debt service payments is property lax revenues also collected by the County of Orange orr the property lax bill. Since the first major apportionment is scheduled for late November, and the annual principal payments on COP debt is due in August, the payment must be paid from cash on hand. For this reason, "Dry-Period Funds"equal to the Debt Service requirements due in August of each year have been established. The current requirement is approximately$26 million. GGS:Ic H'%WP.DTA\FIN@ lOkCRANETAHRTAHR.9T WINOVRA97 ❑ caved.INFO.ITEM arBd S" OL&Only AGENDA O cOMd.AOnoRiTErl ITEM ❑ JT.OD5.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT.BOS.DISCISSION (NON-CONSENTj .,'�❑ PUBLIIC�Cy�HaSARaw ^r'JT.aDS.L£ErWG DATE rf.SM.A3ENOA REM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OUTS: OMTS (Originator) PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR ALL 2410,Barbara Collins,3027 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:7/30/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION)S): Agenda Wording: FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT:On July 9, 1997,the FAHR Committee approved a Financial Assistance Program recommended by General Services Administration. Recommended Recommended Adon(s): 1. Based upon the information in the attached report,the FAHR Committee approves and recommends a computer financial assistance program wilh the following terms: -Maximum loan of$3000. -interest rate of 5% per year. •10%down payment. -Aggregate maximum loan fund of$150,000 -24 months repayment period. -Districts'compatible equipment. 2.Allocate$150,000 of short term investments to establish a revolving fund of$150,000 to be repaid within 24 months. CEQA REVIEW: ProjeM is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on N/A Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination fled on_ CURRENT BUDGET/COST CUIRRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-0ATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES IT.,Me.P' . Trvmssl TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ N/A N/A N/A N/A SOURCE: JIG ScheduleUr a Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SchedulelLvre Item. TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS NT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: N/A N/A N/A $0.00 Master Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AFTNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,Po, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT N/A N/A N/A $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES If YES,ante number: Pemlanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section Iesn. Qsl"7 Page 1 of 2 A:ULY97GB.WPD I/ 4� ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Liet): ta. '( _ /Q Stan report • Originator ate 2. Financial Assistance Program Paacies and Procedures 3. Computer Purchase Specification Sheet r CONCURRENCES: 4. Participation and Leon Agreement Signature Date DiNsion Man gar(Or Designee) /n ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List)C / 7/1/97 1. Stan report 2. Finarrcbl Assistance Program Policies and procedures Signature 3. Computer Purchase Specification Sheet Department Head(Or Designee) q, Participation and Loan Agreement A l q-7 S. Example of a ban repayment w4mdute Sig a Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background andfor Summary) Education and training make employees more valuable and flexible. Computer skills are a priority for both administrative and field personnel to prepare for changes in technologies at the Districts. The new information systems (LIMS, FIS, Plant Automation)will require higher computer skills from employees and will also eliminate some current job responsibilities. Employees with home personal computers, especially employees without access to PC's at work, will increase their computer literacy and, in doing so, increase cross-training Capabilities. BAC c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager R.meemaew Page 2 of 2 A:u LV97GS.wPD July 30, 1997 STAFF REPORT Consideration of a proposal to establish an employee computer purchase assistance program. Proposal Based upon the following report Executive Management Team and Steering Committee recommend an employee assistance program for purchasing computers with the following suggested terms: • Maximum loan of$3,000. • 5% interest (Local Agency Investment Fund rate) • Repayment period of 24 months. • Aggregate maximum loan fund of$150,000. • 10% Down Payment • Districts' compatible computer equipment Report The City of San Louis Obispo recently surveyed 450 California cities concerning computer assistance programs. They received 218 responses ( 48.4% response rate) with 88 cities (40.4%) indicating some type of financial support. There are direct loan programs in 73 of the responding cities, and a breakdown of the supplied information indicates that: Maximum Loan Amount Number Percent >$4,000 14 19% $3,500-$3,999 8 11% $3,000-$3,499 22 29% $2,500-$2,999 14 19% <$2,500 15 21% Interest Rate Number Percent No interest 60 82% Low Interest (5-6%) 13 18% Maximum Repayment Time Number Percent >36 months 24 33% 25-35 months 3 4% 24 months 34 47% <24 months 12 16% Computer Assistance Program Page 2 of 4 July 30, 1997 The following table includes the computer assistance information of some local cities and agencies within the service area of the Districts. City Eligibility Interest Loan Repayment Period Maximum Maximum La Palma 1070 hours 0% $2000 24 months Los Alamitos 1 year 0% $5,000 24 months Orange None 0% $5,000 48 Months Fullerton 6 months 0% $3,000 30 months Stanton None 0% $2,500 24 months Garden Grove 6 months 0% $3,000 24 months Anaheim 6 months 0% $3,000 24 months Irvine Ranch W. D. 1 year 0% $3,000 24 months 0. C. W. D. 1 year 0% $3,000 12 months O. C. W. D. 1 year 1 0% $5,000 24 months Metropolitan W. D. 1 year. 0% $2,000 12 months There are aggregate caps in some cities/agencies. When the aggregate maximum amount is loaned to employees, waiting lists are established; as loan amounts are repaid, the citylagency will loan available funds to more employees. City/Agency Aggregate Cap Number of Employees $ per Capita Irvine Ranch W. D. $150,000 261 $575 Orange County W. D. $50,000 175 $286 Metropolitan W. D. $10,000 25 $400 San Clemente $38,000 169 $225 City of Orange 1 $200,000 1 650 $308 Stanton $10.000 38 $263 Anaheim $200,000 2400 $83 Chino Basin S. D. $100,000 213 $470 r Computer Assistance Program Page 3 of 4 July 30, 1997 Employee eligibility for loans varied: • 1 year of employment • After probationary period. 1070 hours worked. Six months (often probationary time). • No waiting period, immediate eligibility. A few cities, computer assistance to part time employees. • Most cities, regular full time employees after probation. In addition to direct loans, there were other means of assistance. Purchase surplus computers. • Purchase computers at a city negotiated price with volume discounts. • Reimburse the employee for the interest on a privately secured loan on a yearly basis. Direct reimbursement for career enhancement and professional development programs. • Conversion of sick leave accruals toward computer purchase. • Loans from employees deferred compensation plans (457 and 401 a). During interviews, representatives from various local cities indicated areas of concern and interest with programs that they had implemented. • City/agency must ensure that employee has no garnishments or liens before granting loan, causing extra administrative work. Some of the cities surveyed required a down payment, usually of 10%, but most did not. When participating employees terminated employment, payments from last check usually covered the remainder of the loan. Infrequently, they did not and the city/agency either lost the income or lost time and money pursuing the claim. • Public perception of giving employees benefits generated from taxes could be a problem. • One agency decided against claiming money from the families of employees who had died. • No MAC's were allowed at one agency because of incompatibility. Some agencies allowed upgrades, others did not. • Some agencies had a stated minimum to prevent "nickel and dime" purchases. Some agencies allowed the purchase of any software and some were highly restrictive. • Most stipulated that the software be similar to the software used at work. • Some cities dealt with one manufacturer and the employees were limited to those packages; some cities allowed any vendor and any packages. and some cities offered combinations of all three. Computer Assistance Program Page 4 of 4 July 30, 1997 The cities and agencies which are serviced by the Districts offered computer assistance in the following manner: Type of Organization Number Total Percent Cities 7 23 30.4% Sanitary Districts 0 4 0% Water Districts 4 5 80% Interviews with representatives of 22 sanitation districts of varying size throughout the States of California and Nevada determined that only four of 22 agencies (18.2%) offered employee assistance in purchasing computers. Sanitary Eligibility Interest Loan Repayment #of Agg.Cap $ per District Period Maximum Maximum Emp. Cap. West Bay 6 months 0% $3,000 24 months 21 0 ? Chino 6 months 0% $3,000 24 months 213 $100,000 $470 Central C.C. Off prob. 6% $2,000 $100/mo. 247 0 ? Union 6 months 0% $3,000 36 months 139 $100,000 $719 The attached contracts, policies and procedures, and computer specification form were created based upon existing plans at the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and adapted to the requirements of the Districts. If you have any questions regarding this report, or if you require and further analyses, please call me at extension 3027. \BAC A:VULY97-1.WPD Attachments COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMPUTER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM POLICIES PURPOSE The Financial Assistance Program for purchasing computer equipment is provided to assist employees in developing and/or increasing computer skills which will enhance performance and prepare for the Districts' plans to implement progressive information technology systems. EMPLOYEE ELIGIBILITY Regular and part-time employees, in good standing, who have completed six months of service with the Districts are eligible for loans under this program. Participants must agree to comply with all requirements and provisions. LOAN LIMITATIONS • Loans will be made to employees on a first-come, first-serve basis, until the $150,000 loan fund is depleted. As funds become available through loan repayment, additional loans will be processed. • A written agreement between the District and the participant is required. The Participation and Loan Agreement outlines the responsibilities of the participant, terms of the agreement, payroll deduction arrangements, and other conditions of the plan. • The purchase of games and entertainment software is not allowed with loan funds. • All computer equipment purchases must be approved by the Manager of the Information Technology Division before the loan is issued. LOAN CRITERIA The provisions of the Financial Assistance Program are: • A maximum of $3,000 will be lent to eligible employees for purchase and/or upgrades of systems and peripherals determined to be eligible under the plan. An employee may apply for another loan when a previous loan has been repaid. • Due to administrative costs, the minimum loan amount will be $500. • Each loan will be repaid over a maximum period of two years and will be issued at a 5% interest rate. Early repayments or shorter payback periods are acceptable at an employee's request. • Loan payments will be made through bimonthly payroll deductions. Payment will be determined by the amount financed, plus interest over the finance period, divided by 52 pay periods (26 per year for two years). • Loans are due and payable in full upon termination of employment for any reason. The loan balance will be deducted from the final paycheck. Outstanding balances will be paid within 10 days of termination. SYSTEM CRITERIA Computers and peripheral hardware/software conforming to the Districts' internal Windows-based system standards are required equipment for Information Technology approval. RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OR ASSIGNMENT Each participant in the Program agrees that equipment and software purchased with Districts' funding remain the property of the employee or a member of the employee's family. Any reassignment or transfer of the equipment until the loan is repaid violates the agreement and cancels the right to participate in the plan. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Y COMPUTER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PROCEDURE TO APPLY FOR A LOAN • Obtain an explanation of the Policies of the Computer Financial Assistance Program, a Computer Specification Sheet, and a Participation and Loan Agreement from Human Resources. • Obtain a quotation(s) from a vendor(s) for the hardware and software purchases to be funded by the program. Submit the Loan Application Form and the Computer Specification Sheet with attached quotation(s) from vendor(s) (or invoices of purchased equipment) to Human Resources. • Human Resources will route the Specification Sheet and quotations to the Manager of Information Technology for approval. Human Resources will notify the employee if equipment is not approved. • After approval, Human Resources will verify employment, calculate payroll deductions, prepare the Loan Agreement, and route it to the Director of Finance/Accounting. • The Director of Finance/Accounting will approve and sign the loan agreement, and, within two weeks of approval, have the check(s) prepared and issued to: Either the employee for the purchase price, less the 10% down payment amount, for reimbursement of purchased, approved equipment. (Note: Employees purchasing equipment before approval by the InformationTechnology Manager risk non-reimbursement.) Or the employee and the vendor(s) jointly for purchase of approved equipment in the amount of the agreed upon price, less the 10% down payment. • Human Resources will notify the employee that the Participation and Loan Agreement is ready for signature. The employee will sign Loan Agreement and pick up checks at Human Resources. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMPUTER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM �4 Employee's Computer Specification Sheet Employee: Department: Check one: ❑ Addition to Existing System ❑ New System Computer Equipment Price Sub Total Tax Total Purchase Price Less 10% Down Payment Total Loan Amount (Not to exceed $3000.) Employee Signature: Date: Manager of Information Technology Signature: ❑ Approved ❑ Denied r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMPUTER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Participation and Loan Agreement Employee Name: Social Security Number: The above named employee(Participant)of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(CSDOC) has been provided a copy of the CSDOC Computer Purchase Financial Assistance Program and hereby elects to purchase a computer and/or certain related equipment and/or software as specified on the attached Employee's Computer Specification Sheet and to participate in the financing arrangement offered under the Program and further agrees to and accepts the following terms and conditions: 1. The total price of the equipment to be purchased is $ and is identified on the attached Employee's Computer Specification Sheet. The Participant provides a down payment equal to ten percent of the total price of the equipment to the vendor. 2. CSDOC agrees to make a 5% loan to the Participant in the amount of$ for a period not to exceed 24 months to purchase the computer equipment shown on the Employee's Computer Specification Sheet. 3. Participant authorizes CSOOC to deduct$ from each paycheck of the Participant beginning until the amount identified in Paragraph 2 has been paid in full. Participant may elect to pay the remaining unpaid balance at any time prior to the last payroll deduction. 4. Participant agrees not to sell,trade, or otherwise dispose of the Equipment until the loan has been paid in full. Participant also agrees that any reassignment or transfer of the Equipment or this Agreement will result in cancellation of this Agreement. Violation of these provisions will require Participant to immediately pay to CSDOC the remaining amount due on the loan. 5. Upon termination of the Participant from the employment of CSDOC for any reason, any remaining amount to be paid to CSDOC under this Agreement shall immediately become due and payable. Participant hereby authorizes CSDOC to withhold from his/her final pay, including sick leave and vacation payoff, any amount remaining under this Agreement. If such Participant's final pay is not sufficient to cover said balance, then such Participant shall personally be responsible for paying the balance to CSOOC within ten It 0)days of termination. 6. All warranties and service or maintenance contracts shall be between the vendor and the Participant. Participant shall deal directly with the vendor, and in no event shall Participant look to CSDOC for any claims relating to warranty, service, or maintenance. 7. This Agreement may be changed only by a written document signed by CSOOC and the Participant and supersedes any and all written or oral agreements, proposals, and communications concerning the Program. 8. In the event either party hereto brings any suit against the other party to enforce any rights under this Agreement,the prevailing party in such suit shall recover from the other party its reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection therewith. Accepted: Participant: Dale: Approved: Director of Finance/Accounting: Date: 7/21/97 e Computer Loan Repayment Schedule For computer loan to: Enter: Principal, Months to Repay.Annual Rate and Loan Date Interest Amounts, Payment Amounts, Remaining Balances and Term Are Automatic Principal: $3,000.00 Loan Date mm/dd/yy: 07/30/97' Months to Repay: 24.00 Tenn of Loan: Payperiods: 26/yr 52.00 Payroll Deductions Start Dale: Aug-97 Annual Rate: .0000 r5.00% Approx Payroll Ded End Dale: Aug-99 Payperiod Interest: 0.19% Remaining Interest Principal Periodic Remaining Interest Principal Periodic Period Principal Payment P2ympnf Payment Period Principal Payment Payment Payment 1 $3,000.00 $5.77 $54.91 $60.68 27 1,537.46 2.96 57.72 60.68 2 2,945.09 5.66 55.02 60.68 28 1,479.73 2.85 57.83 60.68 3 2,890.07 5.56 55.12 60.68 29 1,421.90 2.73 57.95 60.68 4 2.834.95 5.45 55.23 60.68 30 1.363.95 2.62 58.06 60.68 5 2,779.72 5.35 55.33 60.68 31 1.305.89 2.51 58.17 60.68 6 2,724.39 5.24 55.44 60.68 32 1,247.73 2.40 58.28 60.68 7 2,668.94 5.13 55.55 60.68 33 1,189.44 2.29 58.39 60.68 8 2,613.40 5.03 55.65 60.68 34 1,131.05 2.18 58.51 60.68 9 2,557.74 4.92 55.76 60.68 35 1,072.55 2.06 58.62 60.68 10 2,501.98 4.81 55.87 60.68 36 1,013.93 1.95 58.73 60.68 11 2,446.11 4.70 55.98 60.68 37 955.20 1.84 58.84 60.68 12 2,390.14 4.60 56.08 60.68 38 896.35 1.72 58.96 60.68 13 2,334.05 4.49 56.19 60.68 39 837.40 1.61 59.07 60.68 14 2,277.86 4.38 56.30 60.68 40 778.33 1.50 59.18 60.68 15 2,221.56 4.27 56.41 60.68 41 719.14 1.38 59.30 60.68 16 2,165.15 4.16 56.52 60.68 42 659.85 1.27 59.41 60.68 17 2,108.64 4.06 56.63 60.68 43 600.43 1.15 59.53 60.68 18 2,052.01 3.95 56.73 60.68 44 540.91 1.04 59.64 60.68 19 1,995.28 3.84 56.84 60.68 45 481.27 0.93 59.75 60.68 20 1,938.43 3.73 56.95 60.68 46 421.51 0.81 59.87 60.68 21 1,881.48 3.62 57.06 60.68 47 361.64 0.70 59.98 60.68 22 1,824.42 3.51 57.17 60.68 48 301.66 0.58 60.10 60.68 23 1,767.25 3.40 57.28 60.68 49 241.56 0.46 60.22 60.68 24 1,709.96 3.29 57.39 60.68 50 181.34 0.35 60.33 60.68 25 1,652.57 3.18 57.50 60.68 51 121.01 0.23 60.45 60.68 26 1,595.07 3.07 57.61 60.68 52 60.56 0.12 60.56 60.68 Subtotal $115.15 $1,462.54 $1.677.69 Subtotal $40.23 $1.537.46 $1,577.69 Grand Total $155.38 $3.000.00 $3,155.38 Computer_loan.xis 11:06 AM F�,N S- Us.D„r, AGENDA ❑ COMM.WED.ITEM ❑ caa.ACTroN, EM ITEM ❑ Jr.BS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ Ji.BOS.DSCUSSION ap pp (PUBLIC HNSENQ O PUBAl1nC HEARING 7�l/�x/ jr.BD5.AEETIq DATE 1 •`. JT.BDS.AGEND11TEM NO. / MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. J CONTACT FOR INFORMATION CUTS: (Ongmaw') POC:FAHR: 7-9-97IK ALL 2210.Steve Kozak,2504 EXEC:STEER: Division No..Name,and Uina bn JT.SDS: 7.3D97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wordina: DECLARATION OF DISTRICTS' OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE THE DISTRICTS' EXISTING CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE OF, AND IN ANTICIPATION OF, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES, FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE INDEBTEDNESS ISSUE (All Districts) Recommended Action(s): 1. Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee adopt a motion to recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt attached Resolution No. 97-XX. CEOA REVIEW: ProjM is Exempla NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Dale Notice of Exemption Flkd'. Negative Declaration Approved on July 13, 1994 Final EIR Approved on and Notice o1 Determination fled on U Y CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-0ATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT T043ATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES as,ews.t in. Tnnaen) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ N/A N/A N/A N/A SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS ScInedule&me Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SclneduWLlne Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET Fist Year in Budget: S0.00 Master Plan Estimate'. Year of Fist Casts: THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS. AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES II YES,efale rumba, Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section It „„ WI"7 Page 1 of 2 H 1WP.DTAT IN1221 MCRA N ETAHRIFAHR.97U U LYTAHR9749 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Usl): L SaulLY ej} Ongin Or Date 1. Board Resolution RRENCES: Sign a Date D. . . obit n g (Or e I I77 7 ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(Us) Si re Date 1. Board Resolution D arhnent Heal(Or Designee) Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background andlor Summary) Background The "2020 Master Plan" and the "Five-Year Financial Plan"call for a 50:50 mix of capital improvement funding from borrowing, and pay-as-you-go, over the 30-year Master Plan period. The 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program Certificates of Participation (COP), Series "A," "B," and "C;were issued in the aggregate amount of$316,055,000 in accordance with this policy direction. The last"new money' COP (Series "C')was issued in September 1992. Two Refunding COPS to refinance already existing debt, were completed in December 1992, and September 1993. However, there were no new borrowings in 1993-94, 1994-95, or 1995-96. The Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee has previously expressed the Committee's intent to conduct a selection process for a public financing team prior to the next financing; and this process will take several months. During the selection process, the Districts will use accumulated capital reserves to fund capital projects at the Plants, or within individual Districts, until the proceeds from a new COP issue are available. Update Intent to Reimburse In accordance with U.S. Treasury Regulations, the Joint Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No. 94-81 (July 13, 1994) declaring the Districts' intent to reimburse, from future long-term borrowings, Districts' reserve funds expended for certain capital improvement costs. However, the capital financing program planned for 1994-95 and 1995-96 was postponed due to the Orange County bankruptcy. Staff is initiating preparations for a new capital financing program to support the "Strategic Plan Update;and related capital projects. To ensure that the Districts can include monies in upcoming borrowings to reimburse reserve funds for expenditures made in advance of available COP proceeds, it is necessary to update the Districts' declaration of intent to do so. Therefore, the attached "Reimbursement Resolution"has been prepared by General Counsel for adoption by the Joint Boards of Directors. Under provisions of U.S. Treasury Regulation 1.15D-2, the Districts may reimburse its reserves for preliminary expenditures, such as design, engineering and similar costs, advanced to fund projects covered by the July 1994 Reimbursement Resolution. The Regulations permit up to 20% of the aggregate par amount of bond proceeds from a new issue to be used for reimbursement of preliminary project expenditures, subsequent to the July 1994 Reimbursement Resolution. Recommended Action Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration & Human Resources Committee adopt a motion to recommend that the Joint Boards of Directors adopt attached Resolution No. 97-XX. sack Rya av,.er Page 2 of 2 H:\W P.DTA\F]N=10lCRANETAHRTAHR.97UULYIFAHR97.49 RESOLUTION NO. 97-28 DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL INTENT TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN OF THE DISTRICTS'CAPITAL RESERVES FUNDS FOR EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE FOR 1997-98 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM PROCEEDS OF FUTURE INDEBTEDNESS ISSUE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THEIR INTENT TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN OF THE DISTRICTS'CAPITAL RESERVES FUNDS FOR EXPENDITURES MADE IN ADVANCE FOR 1997-98 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM PROCEEDS OF A FUTURE INDEBTEDNESSISSUE ...... ....... .. WHEREAS, on July 13, 1994, the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California(collectively the "Issuer") adopted Resolution No. 94-81, declaring their official intent to reimburse their existing capital reserve funds and accounts for certain expenditures made in advance of and in anticipation of issuing indebtedness for capital improvements to be acquired, constructed, or paid for, by or on behalf of the Districts during the period from July 1, 1994 to June 30, 1995, or such later date as the Districts shall determine; and, - WHEREAS, the Issuer intends to acquire and/or construct, or otherwise improve, certain capital improvements during Fiscal Year 1997-98, as described in Exhibit"A" (the "Project"), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and, WHEREAS, the Issuer expects to pay certain expenditures (the "Reimbursement Expenditures") in connection with the Project prior to the issuance of indebtedness for the purpose of financing costs associated with the Project on a long-term basis; and, WHEREAS, the Issuer reasonably expects that the debt obligations in an amount not to exceed $100 million will be issued and that certain of the proceeds of such debt obligations will be used to reimburse the Issuer for Reimbursement Expenditures; -1- NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: SECTION 1: That the Issuer finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: That this declaration is made solely for purposes of establishing compliance with the requirements of Section 1.150-2 of the U.S. Treasury Regulations. This Resolution declaration does not bind the Issuer to make any expenditure, incur any indebtedness, or proceed with the Project. SECTION 3: That the Issuer hereby declares its official intent to use proceeds of indebtedness to reimburse itself for the Reimbursement Expenditures. SECTION 4: That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 30, 1997. H:\wp.dta\admi n\BSVRESRES97\97-28.doc -2- EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The following capital projects and improvements shall constitute the Project, to the extent such capital projects and improvements are acquired, constructed or paid for by or on behalf of the Districts during the period commencing July 1, 1997, and ending on June 30, 1998 (or such later dale as the Districts shall determine.) Category A. Plant No. 1 new and rebudgeted major projects to provide increased primary and secondary treatment plant facilities and Master Plan projects for headworks, digesters, and power systems. Also includes seismic retrofit, primary treatment, and secondary treatment upgrades and expansion and other safety and miscellaneous improvements. Category B. Plant No. 2 new and rebudgeted major projects to provide the necessary digestion capacity to serve the increased primary and secondary treatment plant facilities. Includes Master Plan projects for primary basins and power systems. Also includes seismic retrofit, primary treatment, and secondary treatment upgrades and expansion and other safety and miscellaneous improvements. Category C. Includes improved treatment and additional capacity projects for regional water reclamation. Category D. Includes replacement and rehabilitation, improved treatment, and additional capacity projects for interplant and joint facilities such as support facilities, ouffall and booster pump stations, sludge disposal, and other Master Plan projects. Category E. Includes special projects, studies, and research for improved treatment and additional capacity at Plants No. 1 and No. 2. Category F. Includes certain equipment for replacement and rehabilitation, improved treatment, and additional capacity at Plants No. 1 and No. 2. Category G. Includes miscellaneous capital improvement projects within County Sanitation District No. 1. Category H. Includes certain manhole access modifications, subtrunk rehabilitation, pump station rehabilitation, pump station rehabilitation, sewer line crossing upgrades, and projects required by freeway widenings and other miscellaneous projects within County Sanitation District No. 2. Category 1. Includes certain sewer line replacements, trunk rehabilitation, force main replacements, pump and lift station rehabilitation, sewer line crossing upgrades, and projects required by freeway widenings and other miscellaneous projects within County Sanitation District No. 3. Category J. Includes certain pump station improvements, trunk rehabilitation, and other miscellaneous projects within County Sanitation District No. 5. Category K. Includes pump station improvements and rehabilitation, sewer line and trunk rehabilitation, and other miscellaneous projects within County Sanitation District No. 6. -1- Cateaory L. Includes manhole access modifications, trunk replacement, sewer system , improvements, pump station expansion and rehabilitation, projects required by freeway widenings, and other miscellaneous projects within County Sanitation District No. 7. Cateaory M. Includes pump station improvements and replacements, sewer line and trunk rehabilitation, and other miscellaneous projects with County Sanitation District No. 11. Cateaory N. Includes certain subtrunk and interceptor capacity projects and other miscellaneous projects within County Sanitation District No. 13. Cateaory O. Includes certain interceptor capacity and other miscellaneous projects within County Sanitation District No. 14. H\w .DTATIW21 U,CRANE AHRTAHRMULMIPE '2 Fo,M S. UseOnN AGENDA ❑ COMM.INFO.REM ❑ COMA.ACTION ITEM - ITEM 4' ❑ Jr.SD$,CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ N BOS.OISEN-n V m o MONLONSENn ❑ PU&IC HEARING ��y!�3'4�4 JT.BIDS,MEETING DATE JT.BDS.AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.to.NO. DISTRICT NO. o CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OUTS: OMITS (Originator) PDC: PDC FAHR: 7/9/97 FAHRR 4�p ALL 2220,Michael D.White,2520 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Dmsian No.,Name,arM Extension JT.BDs:7/30/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordino: 1997-98 FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE UPDATE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE DISTRICTS' FINANCIAL INFORMATION SOFTWARE VENDOR, J.D. EDWARDS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,384.87 (All Districts) Recommended Action(s): Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee accept the 1997-98 financial information software update and software maintenance agreement with the Districts' financial information software vendor, J.D. Edwards, in the amount of$55,384.87, and recommend approval by the Joint Boards at the July 30, 1997 meeting. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: _ Negative Declaration Approved an Jul 24. 1996-A Approval Of J.D. Edwards contract. Heal EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination fled on Y PP CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENTYFAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES (^m ll c 0. Try l ) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$57,860 $57,860 $- $57,860 $57,860 SOURCE: JO Schedule/ mItems: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: ScWuktUm Item' TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year in Budget: N/A WA N/A WA Nester Plan Estimate: Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AR AMOUNT $- $- $55,384.87 $55,384.87 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REOU!RES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOTAPPLICABLE If YES,slate number: Permanent Umded Term If YES,e,W,n in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION r.edion Rm DS1497 Page 1 of H 9WP.OTAITIM221MCRANEIFAHRVAHR 97LIULYr AHR9750 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(UN): 7 / 7 ngina e D t CONCUR NC �147 gna a Date D ion Manager(O sigmas) nq ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) gnature Date epar6n Head(Or Designee) Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) At the July 24, 1996, the Joint Boards approved the acquisition and installation of a new financial information system through J.D. Edwards at a cost not to exceed $1,485,000. The payroll, budget, and human resource modules were implemented in January, February, and June of 1997, respectively. General ledger, accounts payable, and accounts receivable went "live"this month, and we are projecting to go"live"with purchasing, warehousing, inventory, and fixed assets in October of this year. Final hardware, software, and installation costs are now projected to be under budget by as much as$200,000. Part of the cost of any computer system is the annual cost of maintaining the system and upgrading the software as new releases become available. During the negotiations for the acquisition and installation of a new financial information system in July of 1996, J.D. Edwards Informed us that the annual software update and software maintenance agreement for fiscal year 1997-98 would be $52,292, excluding sales tax. The amount of this service has now been reduced to$51,401.37, or$55,384.87 including sales tax. Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee accept the 1997-98 financial information software update and software maintenance agreement with the Districts'financial information software vendor, J.D. Edwards, in the amount of$55,384.87, and recommend approval by the Joint Boards at the July 30, 1997 meeting. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager Rw UM Page 2 of 2 H:1W P.DTAIFIN(12101CRANEIFAHR(FAHR.97UULV1FAHR97.W Fm eE.Sm Uce OnN AGENDA ❑ CONM.aJFO.REM ❑ CCMO.ACTION ITEM ITEM ❑ IT.SOS.CONSENT ❑ JT.BDS.DISCUSSION TRANSMITTAL (NONLONBENT) ❑ PUBLIC HEARING 7 30 �JT.BOB.MEETItG DATE JT.BOS.AGENDA REM NO. MEETING DATE comm.10.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OMTS (Onginatur) Poo: POC All 310,Penny Kyle,2026 FAHR: FAHR EXEC: EXEC Division No.,Name,and Extension STEER: STEER JT.BDS: 07/30/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: Annual election of Joint Chair(Nominee: Director John Collins); and, nomination and election of Vice Joint Chair. Recommended Actions): Staff has no recommendations. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt:NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Data Notice of Exemption Filed: JUIy 24, 1997 Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination riled on- CURRENTBUDGET/COST CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TU-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES R.ol Men 0. T woo,) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$ SOURCE: CORE JO DISTRICTS N/A N/A N/A N/A Sehedulelline Items: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Scheduslune Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Year In Budget: Master Plan Estimate: $0.00 Year of First Costs: THIS AITNENDOR/PROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NOYES REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES NO NOT APPLICABLE If YES,state numEer: _Permanent Limited Term If YES,eplain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section RM.. 0111.1 Page 1 of 2 klEADIDATA2\WP.DTAIAGEN DAW ITS-97UULYWITI 5.DOC ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(LIM) Originator Date CONCURRENCES. Signature Date ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(List) Division Manager(Or Designee) t. Signature/ Date Depe § (OfD ee) Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedure, nominations for Joint Chair were made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chair will be Conducted immediately following the election of the Joint Chair. For the Directors information, included below is an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedure relative to the election of the Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. "Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, A Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint Chair shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June of each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Joint Chair. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. The nominations and election for Vice Joint Chair shall be made at the regular Board meeting in July of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Joint Chair. The Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chair becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Joint Chair shall automatically succeed to the office of the Joint Chair and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Joint Chair becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Districts. Subject to the provisions of serving at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts, the Joint Chair shall not serve more than two consecutive one-year terms for which he/she has been elected to the office of Joint Chair. " c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager R,,;,aa,I,W Page 2 of 2 1LLEADIDATAZWPDTAWGENDAWITS 97UULYWITiS.DOC For ad Sac Jr,0 N AGENDA ❑ COMM.INFO,ITEM ITEM ❑ CONTA.ACTION ITEM ❑ J .BOG.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ Jr.BOS.DLSCUBSIDN (NONLbNBENT) (❑ PUBBIJU HEARING JT.DIM MEETING DATE Jr.BOS.AGENDA ITEM NO MEETING DATE COMM.ID,NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMITS: OMTS (Originator) PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR 3720,Chuck Winsor,x5052 EXEC: EXEC 7& 14 STEER: STEER DMsion No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:7/30/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wording: ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-7-1, AND ABANDONMENT OF NINE DISTRICT NO. 7 PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 7-14 (Districts 7 & 14) : The Director of Engineering requests approval of Addendum No. 4 to the PSA providing for additional work for construction contract support services during the construction of Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1. Recommended Action(s): 1. Approve Addendum No. 4 to the PSA with Boyle Engineering Corporation in the amount of$123,947.00 for a total amount not to exceed $487,945.00. CEOA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Final EIR Approved on July 19,1989;am Notice of Detemlinalion filed on July 20,1989 423/97 CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES (mm Budget slue Tr.,'..) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$3,371.000 $1,250,000 $364,798 $885,202 $1,250,000 SOURCE: CIP-DISTRICTS 7514 Schedule/Line Items:D7,Item 10;D14,Rem 1 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: SchedulelLine Item: TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL BUDGET PREVIOUS BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET First Yearin Budget: 1990-91 $3,371,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,371,000.00 Master Plan Estimate: $1,000," Year of First Costs: 1990-91 THIS AITNENDORIPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT $216,168.00 $147,830.00 $123,947.00 $487,945.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,state number: _Pemlanent Llmded Term If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL IN FORMATION sachem R"WovtAsv Page 1 of 2 HAVVP.DTAI GENDAWITS-97UULYIENG.04 ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(Uot): -7 3/`/7 1. Boyle Englneering propmel ktler dated May 1,1997 Originator Did 2. Budget lnlormatlen Tads 3. PSA Statue Repo" CONCURRENCES Sign re Date D on Man ( gn ^ ATTACHMENTS TO"N'T BOARDS AGENDA(UN) Signatur Date De a ign Signs re Data Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) The original PSA provided very limited Construction contract support services Commensurate with the original project scope of providing five new pumps, motors, VFD's, shafts, discharge header, electrical and instrumentation modifications and miscellaneous appurtenances. The previous three addenda added a significant amount of additional design services because of changes to electrical and safety codes, the very significant addition of an emergency generator and separate building to house it, the decision to add automation to the pump station through a fully"programmable logic Controller" (PLC), and the change to increase the reliability through redundant force mains and discharge headers leaving the pump station. All of these items added significant Cost and complexity to the project resulting in the greatly increased need for additional construction contract support services from the design Consultant, Boyle Engineering Corporation, during the construction phase of the project. The Director of Engineering and Selection Committee made up of the Chairs of District Nos. 7 and 14 recommend approval of Addendum No. 4 to the PSA, increasing the amount of Compensation by$123,947.00, for a total not to exceed amount of$487,945.00. BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Improvements to Main Street Pump Station Contract No. 7-7-1 TASK ORIGINAL REVISED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATE BUDGET BUDGET AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE % (1990-91) (1996-97) TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE COMPLETE FUNDS TO DATE DESIGN $500,000 $500,000 $363,998 $123,947 $487,945 $340,298 69.7% CONSTRUCTION $2.875,000 $2,721,000 $2,394,700 $2,394,700 $0 0% STAFF COSTS $150 000 $150 000 $150 000 $150 000 $24 500 16.3% TOTAL 1 $3,525,000 $3,371,000 $2.908.698 $123.947 $3,032,645 $364.798 1 12.03% CFW: H:\WP.DTA%GENDA%ITS-97UUI- I NG.04 c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations Rye osna o Page 2 of 2 H:\W P.DTA%GENDA%ITS-97UULTIENG.04 ❑ COMM.wFG.REM F,,M Soc U-Orl, AGENDA yy, ❑ COMM ACTION ITEM ITEM ❑ JS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL _ ❑ Jr..W BCS.DISOLISSION (1JONCONSENT) ❑p�jPUU�BLILI/C�HEARING JW?Jr.SIDS.METING DATE 1T.BDS.AGENDA ITEM NO. MEETING DATE COMM.ID,NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION OMTS: OUTS (Originator) PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR 720,Jim Herberg,x5086 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:07/30/97 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO JOB NOS. P141, P1-43, P1-44, P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021, AND SP19950059 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION FOR PAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH FACILITIES TO PERMIT DISCHARGE OF EXCESS RECLAIMED WATER TO THE DISTRICTS' OCEAN OUTFALL SYSTEM TO BE FUNDED BY DISTRICT 5 (All Districts). The Engineering Department requests approval of Change Order No. 2 for construction costs for an increased amount not to exceed $197,299. Recommended Action(s): All Districts 1. Authorize the General Manager to execute Change Order No. 2 for Job Nos. P1-41, P1-43, P1.44, P2-48, P2-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021, and SP19950059 with Margate Construction to construct intertie facilities between the Green Acres Project distribution system and the Districts' ocean outfall system for an amount not to exceed $197,299, to be funded by District 5. District 5 2. Approve District 5 funding of Change Order No. 2 for Job Nos. P1-41, P1-43, P1-44, P2-48, 132-50, P2-53-2, SP19950021, and SP19950059 with Margate Construction for an amount not to exceed $197,299. CEOA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice or Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on May 1997 Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on y CURRENT BUDGET/COST CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET INFORMATION BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES Irma su^aet xu. T.n.km) TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:$200,000. $125.000 $0 N/A $200,000 SOURCE: DISTRICTS Schedul'i-ine Items:Mies.Projects AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:$75,000 Schedulell.ine Item:District 5 Earthquake/!Flood/Fire Reserves TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINALBUDGET PREVIOUSBUDGET BUDGET CHANGE REVISED TOTAL INFORMATION TOTAL CHANGES THIS AIT PROJECT BUDGET P141,P143,P144,P248,P250,P2.53.2, $13,897,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,897,000.00 SPI9950021,and SP19950059 First Year In Budgel: Master Plan Estimate: Yearof FIre Costa: BM..009,ea7 Page 1 of H:\WP.DTAIAGENDA\AITS-97NUGUST\P248.WPD S MNENDOPJPROJECT COST ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED INFORMATION CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS PROJECT r AMOUNT APPROVED AIT AMOUNT Y $8,461,138.00 $0.00 $197,299.00 $8,658.437.00 w WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDIMNAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE It YES, O mber. Pemnaneet UnI Tenn If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section �7 I- �,.�/ ATTACHMENTS TO COMMITTEE AGENDA(List): Q L - ( l Originator ate CONCURRENCES: ignatur Date ?vision a er rD ) ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT BOARDS AGENDA(Usn -a�77 Signature Date Depart n 4 Or D s'gne Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDMONAL INFORMATION (Background andlor Summary) At the May 1997 Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, the General Manager was authorized to negotiate and execute a change order for Job No. J-34-1 with Advanco Constructors to Construct interne facilities between the Green Acres Project distribution system and the Sanitation Districts' ocean ouffall system at a cost not to exceed $200,000. Subsequent to this authorization, staff solicited an additional proposal from Margate Construction, also working on-site, to get more competitive pricing. Margate Construction submitted the lower price of the two contractors. Staff is requesting that the General Manager's authorization, given in May 1997, be changed to authorize execution of Change Order No. 2 to Job No. P141, at al, with Margate Construction for$197,299. Below is the information presented at the May 1997 Board Meeting as backup information: In September 1996, the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD), the Orange County Water District (OCWD), and the City of Newport Beach (Newport Beach) entered into a three-way agreement (titled the "Basic Integrated Reuse Project" or"BIRP") to allow for the year-round operation of IRWD's water reclamation facilities. This reclaimed water would be used during the winter months of October through March to serve OCWD's Green Acres Project (GAP) customers, who include the Sanitation Districts. It is expected that there will be excess water during these months when landscaping irrigation and other reuse demands are lower than the 7.8 mgd of Flow that OCWD is obligated to accept into its system. It will be necessary to have facilities to dispose of excess reclaimed water. The preferred solution was to use the Sanitation Districts' ocean ouffall. Discharge through the ocean ouffall system requires additional facilities (pipes, valve, and instrumentation) at the Sanitation Districts Plant 2. These facilities are referred to as the "ouffall intertie° in this AIT. (Note that additional intertie facilities are under construction between IRWD and OCWD reclaimed water distribution systems). In January 1997, the Sanitation Districts renegotiated its agreement with OCWD for the purchase of reclaimed water for use at the Districts' two treatment plants, in large part to allow for the discharge of IRWDlGAP excess reclaimed water through Districts'facilities during the winter months. The provisions of this renegotiated agreement included: • A commitment by the Sanitation Districts to purchase 4.2 million gallons per day of reclaimed water; R.acn49a Page 2 of 3 H:1W P.DTAW GENDAWTS-9TAUGUSTIP24 .WPD . An agreement that up to 3.2 million gallons per day of excess reclaimed water could be discharged to the -r Districts' ocean outfall system; and • A provision that the construction costs for the intertie facilities necessary to get the excess reclaimed water into the ocean outfall system would be paid by OCWD, or as otherwise agreed by the parties to the three-way agreement. The intertie to the ocean outfall system had originally been designed to bring the excess reclaimed water to the surge tower. Sanitation Districts' staff concluded that construction of such facilities was undesirable because of the congestion at Plant 2. Perhaps more importantly, staff also realized that, with the OCR project moving forward quickly, the discharge of excess reclaimed water to the ocean was likely to go on only for a few years, making the investment in the pipeline of questionable value. Therefore, the plan now is to build a short connection to the Plant 2 process water system. The excess reclaimed water will be discharged through this system to the Ocean Ouffall Booster Pump Station (OOBS). This plan requires additional pumping costs of about$10,000 per year for the discharge, but reduces construction costs from over$300,000 to approximately $200.000. The Districts would be reimbursed for the pumping costs for the discharge on an annual basis by either OCWD or IRWD. An operating agreement for the disposal will be brought to a later Joint Boards meeting. Construction of the intertie must begin as soon as possible to have the facilities in place by October 1, 1997, to avoid IRWD discharge to Upper Newport Bay. The Districts plan to accomplish the work using change order to Job No. J-34-1. The construction contractor for J-34-1, Advanco, is working in the area where the facilities need to be constructed, and it is most efficient to request that this contractor do the work. Al the request of IRWD and the City of Newport Beach, District 5 authorized funding the cost of constructing the outfall intertie estimated to be$200,000 at the June 25th meeting of the Joint Boards. During a meeting between the Irvine Ranch Water District and the City of Newport Beach, attended by Directors Debay and Swan, it was suggested that District 5 could fund the change order using its capital funds. District 5 does have sufficient funds to pay for this change order. Following completion of all facilities to connect the Green Acres Project and the IRWD reclaimed water distribution system, the parties to the three-way agreement (City of Newport Beach, IRWD, and OCWD)will discuss final funding responsibility for the project. The details and certainty of a reimbursement to District 5 are unknown at this time because the principals (City of Newport Beach, IRWD, and OCWD) have not committed to a reimbursement plan. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager x..,.wosnam Page 3 of 3 H:\W P.DTA W G EN DA V ITS.9TAUG UST1P2-4,W PD . COUNTY OF ORANGE SS. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on &4 &f) 19L was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on� 1342 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 19V- Penny Kyle, Se r of each of the Boards of Director County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California BWoffwJF27A F 's COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING JUNE 25, 1997 RICiS Of099y c� ` co � Z z s v a TMH E ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 _ Minutes for Joint Board Meeting V 06/25/97 Page 2 of 11 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on June 25, 1997, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT X Pat McGui an Chair Thomas E. Lutz NO.1 X James M.Ferryman, Chair pro tem —HArthurPerry X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coomz A I Thomas R. Saaarelii I I Jim Potts Todd Spitzer I X I William G.Steiner DISTRICT X Norman Z.Eckenrode Michael L. Maenzweiler NO.2 X Mark A. Murphy,Chair pro tern Joanne Coontz X Steve Anderson John Holmberg X John Collins James Petdkin X Barry Denes Bob Bell X Burnie Dunlap Marty Simonoff Mark Le es X Bruce A. Broadwater X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz A Chris Norby Don Bankhead Todd S ttzer X William G. Steiner X Hank Wedaa Mark Schwin A I Bob Zemel I I Tom Dal DISTRICT X Marcie L. Rice Chair James V. Evans NO. S X Eva Miner-Bradford Chair pro tem Paul F.Walker X Steve Anderson John Holmberg X George Brown Gwen Forsythe X Tom Carroll Mary Ann Jones X John Collins James Petdkin X Brian Donahue Harry M. Dotson X Burnie Dunlap Marty SlmonoR Mark Le es X Bruce A. Broadwater X Pats Marshall Jack Mauller X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz A Chds Norby Don Bankhead Todd Spitzer X William G.Steiner X Dave Sullivan Tom Hannan X Charles E. Sylvia Alice B.Jempsa A Bob Zemel Tom Dal DISTRICT X Jan Deba , Chair 1 John E. Noyes NO.6 1 X I John E. Noyes, Chair ro tem I Jan Deba X I William G. Steiner I Todd Spitzer DISTRICT X I James M. enyman, Chair 1 Arthur Perry NO.6 X I William G. Steiner I Todd Spitzer X I Jan Debay I Tom W.Thomson Minutes for Joint Board Meeting , 06/25/97 O Page 3 of 11 ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT A Thomas R.Saharelfl Chair Jim Potts NO.7 X Christina Shea Chair pro,tern Barry Hammond X Jan Debay Tom W.Thomson X James M. Ferryman Arthur Perry X Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz X Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coontz X William G. Steiner Todd Spitzer DISTRICT X Shide Dettloff,Chair 1 Tom Hannan NO. 11 X Dave Sullivan,Chair pro tern I I Tom Hannan Todd Spitzer I X I William G.Steiner DISTRICT I X Bumie Dunla Chair Ma Simonoff NO. 13 X Mark Schwin Chair pro tem Hank Wedaa X I Mark A.Murphy Joanne Coontz X I William G.Steiner I I Todd Spitzer A I Bob Zemel I I Tom Dal DISTRICT X Christina Shea Chair Barry Hammond NO.1I A 1 Thomas R. Saltarelli,Chair pro tem Jim Potts X Mark A.Mu Joanne Coontz X I Wiliam G.Steiner I Told Spitzer X I Peer A.Swan I Danyl Miller STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT. Don F. McIntyre, General Manager, Blake P.Anderson,Assistant General Manager of Operations; Judith A. Wilson,Assistant General Manager of Administration; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Jim Harris; John Linder, David A. Ludwin; Bob Ooten; Mike Peterman; Doug Stewart; Gary SVeed; Michelle Tuchman; Nancy Wheatley; Chuck Winsor, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L Woodruff, General Counsel; Mary Lee; Phil Stone RECEIVE AND FILE MINUTE EXCERPT RE BOARD APPOINTMENT (Districts 2 and 3) MOTION: A motion was made, seconded and carried to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Garden Grove re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Director, as follows: ('Mayor) Active Director Alternate Director Mark Leyes Bruce A. Broadwater ` Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 06/25/97 Page 4 of 11 ANNUAL NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIR OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION (All Districts) The General Counsel briefly reviewed the provisions of the Districts' Rules of Procedure relating to nomination and election of the Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair. This being the annual meeting foxed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations open. Director John Collins was then nominated as a candidate for the office of Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. There were no further nominations. It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular July Board meeting. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held at said July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chair will also be held at the regular July meeting. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair reported that A6769 had passed the Senate Local Government with a unanimous vote and should go to the floor later the following week. The Executive Committee was tentatively scheduled to meet in September to review the IAFCO application. Meetings were announced as follows: Rate Advisory Committee—Thursday, July 31 Strategic Plan Board Workshop—Saturday, August 2 at 9:00 a.m. Planning Advisory Committee—Thursday, August 21 Chair Collins also announced that the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee and the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources committee would not be meeting in August. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager referred the Directors to handouts included in their meeting folders that evening. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL The General Counsel reported there would be no need for a Closed Session for those items listed. He provided brief updates on: the status of the appeals of the employees terminated as the result of an investigation; the L. Sanger mano v. County Sanitation Districts; the Bay Bridge Pump Station spill claim; and United Technologies v. District 3. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 06/25/97 p Page 5 of 11 APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts) There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 25, 1997, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Bruce Broadwater requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS (All Districts) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A° "B° and "C°, attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 04/16/97 04/30/97 MISC. Joint Operating Fund - $611,876.46 $682,276.74 $15,687.50 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 3,596,484.96 336,038.60 0.00 Joint Working Capital Fund - 235,856.98 284,700.60 216,922.52 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 169,352.78 24,334.91 36,402.09 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 165.00 2,370.48 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 7,805.87 26,461.88 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 13,301.65 253,232.62 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 177.74 1.195.41 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 150.00 1,692.48 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 1,446.46 7,195.89 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 28,282.50 3.853.71 60,000.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 5 &6 - 224.52 14,94926 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 6 & 7 - 74.84 216.49 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 7& 14 - 3 536.21 4,160.56 0.00 54668.735.97 $1.642.879.63 $$29.01211 AUTHORIZING THE JOINT CHAIR TO DESIGNATE MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS AND AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER. OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO DESIGNATE STAFF TO TRAVEL AS NEEDED ON BEHALF OF THE DISTRICTS : The General Manager requests authority to designate staff to attend and participate in various training programs, meetings, hearings, conferences, facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations providing speck training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the Califomia Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Environment Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Environment Federation. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1) Authorize the Joint Chair to designate members of the Boards of Director to travel and attend meetings, as needed; 2)Authorize the General Manager or his designee to designate staff to travel as needed on behalf of the Districts; and 3)Authorize reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging, and incidental expenses in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1997-1998. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting Y 06/25/97 Page 6 of 11 DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Joint Chair John Collins, Chair of Steering Committee, re the June 25, 1997 meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on May 28, 1997 to be filed. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Pat McGuigan, Chair of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee, re the June 4 and June 14, 1997 meetings, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meetings. The Chair then ordered the draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meetings held on June 4, 1997 and June 14, 1997 to be filed. DISTRICT 2 PERMIT AGREEMENT WITH UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (UNOCAL) FOR THE DISCHARGE OF GROUNDWATER FROM THE UNION COLLIER CHEMICAL PLANT(UCCP) TO THE DISTRICTS SEWERAGE SYSTEM (District No. 2): Technical Services Department requests approval of a Permit Agreement with Unocal for the discharge of groundwater from the UCCP for a two-year period. (OMTS97-010) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to authorize execution of Permit Agreement with Unocal for the discharge of groundwater from the UCCP for a two-year period. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES (AtI Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director Bumie Dunlap, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee, re the June 5, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Planning, Design, and Construction Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held June 5, 1997 to be filed. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, WITH SMITH-EMERY COMPANY, CONVERSE CONSULTANTS, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES (PSI) AND LAW/CRANDALL SPECIFICATION NO. P-175 FOR SOILS. CONCRETE AND OTHER MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of the PSA for geotechnical and testing services. (PDC97-26) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to approve Professional Services Agreements with Smith-Emery Company, Converse Consultants, PSI Consultants and Law/Crandall for geotechnical and materials testing in the amount of$75,000 each for a one-year contract Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 06/25/97 y Page 7 of 11 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FORKERT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING. DGA CONSULTANTS AND BUSH AND ASSOCIATES. SPECIFICATION NO. P-176 FOR SURVEYING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM CONTRACTS AND TREATMENT PLANT JOBS AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2:The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of the PSA for surveying services. (PDC97-27) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to approve Professional Services Agreements with Forkert Engineering and Surveying, DGA Consultants, and Bush and Associates for$100,000 each for a one year contract APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RE RECLAIMED WATER EXTENSION TO HEADWORKS "C"AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P246-2 (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests approval of plans and spec rations and authorization to advertise for bids for extending the reclaimed water piping to Headworks "C" for improved reliability of water supply for the main sewage pumps. (PDC97-28) MOTION: Moved, seconded and cared to: 1)Approve the plans and specifications on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2)Authorize the General Manager to set July 22, 1997, at 11:00 a.m. as the tentative date for bid opening; and 3)Authorize the Board Secretary to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RE PLANT 1 HEADWORKS NO. 2 CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE, JOB NO. J-31-3 (All Districts):The Director of Engineering requests approval of plans and specifications and authorization to advertise for bids for additional computerized automation of plant processes to allow for remote monitoring and control. (PDC97-29) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1)Approve the plans and specifications on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2) Authorize the General Manager to set July 22, 1997, at 11:00 a.m. as the tentative date for bid opening; and 3) Authorize the Board Secretary to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RE SEISMIC RETROFIT OF FOUR STRUCTURES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-44-4(All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests approval of plans and specifications and authorization to advertise for bids for modifications to existing structures necessary to improve resistance to earthquake damage. (PDC97-30) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1) Approve the plans and specifications on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2)Authorize the General Manager to set July 22, 1997, at 11:00 a.m. as the tentative date for bid opening; and 3)Authorize the Board Secretary to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting T 06/25/97 Page 8 of 11 DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION, AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re the June 11, 1997 meeting, summarizing the actions taken and referring to the draft minutes of the meeting. The Chair then ordered the draft Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held June 11, 1997 to be filed. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MAY (All Districts) A motion was made, seconded and carried to receive and file this information-only item. ANNUAL RENEWAL OF THE DISTRICTS'ALL-RISK PROPERTY AND EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 25, 1997, TO JUNE 25, 1998 (All Districts) (FAHR97-37) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to renew the Districts'All-Risk Property and Earthquake Insurance Program for the period June 25, 1997, to June 25, 1998, in an amount not to exceed$1,136,525 million. ANNUAL RENEWAL OF THE DISTRICTS' GENERAL LIABILITY AND EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 1997, TO JULY 1. 1999 (All Districts) (FAHR97-38) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1) Renew the Districts' General Liability and Excess Liability Insurance Program for the period July 1, 1997, to July 1, 1998, in an amount not to exceed $125,000; and 2) Renew the Districts' General Liability and Excess Liability Insurance Program for the period July 1, 1998 to July 1, 1999, in an amount not to exceed $120,000. PROPOSED FY 1997-98 JOINT WORKS OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS, AND 1997-98 INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS' BUDGETS(All Districts) (FAHR97-42) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to approve the proposed Joint Works Operating and Capital Budgets for 1997-98 as follows: Joint Works OperatingNVorking Capital $46,922,650 Workers Compensation Self-Insurance 270,000 Public Liability Self-Insurance 525,000 Joint Works Capital Outlay Revolving 54,540,200 And, Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 06/25/97 p Page 9 of 11 MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to approve the proposed Individual Districts' Budgets for FY 1997-98 as follows: District No. 1 $ 41,537,000 District No. 2 170,725,500 District No. 3 185,427,000 District No. 5 37.245,000 District No. 6 30,140,000 District No. 7 50,928,000 District No. 11 37,117,000 District No. 13 11,246,000 District No. 14 12,954,000 Director Bruce Broadwater requested that his abstention from voting on these matters be made a matter of record. AMENDMENTS TO FY 1997/98 PROPOSED BUDGET (All Districts): As a result of meetings with the FAHR and OMTS Committees, changes to the Budget document are recommended. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to approve changes recommended by the FAHR and OMTS Committees to the Districts' FY 1997/98 Proposed Budget. The recommended changes do not change the proposed budget amounts. Director Bruce Broadwater requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. ADOPTION OF °IDEA" PROGRAM AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE PRIDE PROGRAM IN ORDER TO REWARD EMPLOYEE SUGGESTIONS FOR COST SAVINGS (AII Districts) (FAHR97-44) MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1)Approve an increase from the current$150 minimum award amount to $200 minimum for approved IDEAS for improvement; and 2)Approve an increase from the current$1,500 maximum award amount to $3,000 maximum award amount for approved IDEAS that offer significant cost savings. Cost saving awards to be calculated as the equivalent of 10% of the initial first year's projected savings upon implementation of the suggestion. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3, 5. 6. 7& 11 (ONLY) ADOPT RESOLUTIONS SELECTING THE ANNUAL CHANGE IN CALIFORNIA PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME AS THE COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT FACTOR.AND ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 FOR EACH DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE 1 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1)Adopt resolutions selecting the annual change in California per capita personal income as the cost-of-tiving adjustment factor, and establishing the annual Gann Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 1997-98 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California Government Code as follows: Minutes for Joint Board Meeting t 06/25/97 Page 10 of 11 District Resolution No. Limitation 1 97-20-1 $ 3.022,000 2 97-21-2 11,637,000 3 97-22-3 16,083,000 5 97-23-5 2,892,000 6 97-24-6 1,859,000 7 97-25-7 5,615,000 11 97-26-11 3,469,000 SPECIFICATION NO.V-013. PURCHASE ONE TRUCK MOUNTED HYDRAULIC CRANE (All Districts): Staff requests that a purchase contract be issued to Great Pacific Equipment, Inc.,for the purchase of one truck mounted hydraulic crane for a total amount not to exceed $174,444.46, plus tax for a total of$187,963.90. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 2)Authorize the issuance of a purchase contract for Specification No. V-013 to Great Pack Equipment, Inc., for the purchase of one truck mounted hydraulic crane to be used in the servicing of equipment and facilities at treatments plants and outlying pump stations in an amount not to exceed $174,444.46, plus tax This vehicle replaces V-215, a fifteen-year-old crane that experienced a failure and was auctioned off. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS- IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM, REACH 3. CONTRACT NO. 3-38-3 (District No. 3) : The Director of Engineering requests approval of plans and specifications and authorization to advertise for bids for a replacement gravity sewer line in Imperial Highway between Beach Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard due to deficient capacity on the existing line and the need to construct this line in advance of the OCTA "Smart Street Project" in the City of La Habra. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carried to: 1)Approve the plans and specifications on file at the offices of the Board Secretary; 2)Authorize the General Manager to set July 22, 1997 at 11:00 AM for bid opening; and, 3) Authorize the Board Secretary to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER &MCKEE (CDM) FOR REVIEW OF THE REGIONAL COLLECTION SYSTEM IN THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND DISTRICT NO. 11: The Director of Engineering requests approval of a Professional Services Agreement providing for engineering services to perform a comprehensive review of the local and trunk sewer systems in the northwest portion of Huntington Beach and District No. 11. This work will take place in FY 97-98 and has been included in the proposed FY 97-98 District No. 11 CIP budget. MOTION: Moved, seconded and carded to: 1)Approve Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee in the amount of$84,672. Minutes for Joint Board Meeting 06/25/97 7 Page 11 of 11 ADJOURNMENTS(All Districts : The Chair declared the meeting adjoumed at 8:30 p.m. Secretary f e of erectors of County S nit tlon Di riots Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 H:Wip.dtatadmin�BSNAIN97W62597.doc FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/11197 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID W16197 POSTING DATE 04/16/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158257 MAG SYSTEMS $351.26 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 158258 AM BEST COMPANY $104.95 INSURANCE PUBLICATION 158259 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,889.53 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158250 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $15.07 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 15B261 AT&T-PROWATTS $482.36 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158262 ACCURATE AIR ENGINEERING $1,441.30 FILTERS 158263 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $119,957.40 CONSTRUCTION J-34-1,P2355 158254 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $37,332.90 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-939 158285 JUDYALBERT $125.00 ON-SITE TRAINING 168266 ASM 97TH GENERAL MEETING $225.00 MEETING REGISTRATION 158267 AMSA $1.050.00 MEETING REGISTRATION 158268 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC $973.25 LAB SUPPLIES 158269 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $658.70 NOTICES&ADS 158270 ADS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1.608.72 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 158271 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $236.00 LAB SERVICES 158272 ARENS INDUSTRIES,INC. $3,424.82 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158273 AWARDS&TROPHIES $217.11 PLAQUES 158274 SNI BUILDING NEWS $64.53 PUBLICATION 158275 BAR TECH TELECOM,INC. $100.00 TELEPHONE INSTALLATION 158276 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $209.87 BATTERIES 156277 GENTLY NEVADA $932.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS M 158278 910-GRO DIVISION $70,100.93 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-25-95 y 158279 BLUE WHITE INDUSTRIES INC $210.00 REFUND USER PERMIT FEE F, 158280 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $237.05 TRUCK REPAIRS 158281 RALPH BOYER $319.95 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 95-93 158282 BROWN&CALDWELL CONSULTANTS $11.735.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 93.101 158283 CRM FILMS $1,0112.12 TRAINING VIDEO 158284 CS COMPANY $4,695.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158285 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $96.98 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 158286 CALTROL,INC. $2,812.76 HARDWARE 158287 CALIFORNIA LABORATORIES&DEV $735.00 ESL CERTIFICATION 158288 CAPITAL WESTWARD SYSTEMS $605.10 ELECTRIC PARTS 158289 CAPIO $150.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 158290 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $2,370.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 8.23-95,5-24-95,6-28.95 158291 CASA $170.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 158292 MDTTECHNIONICCO $401.59 GASKETS 158293 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $81,499.15 OFFICE FURNITURE 158294 CENTURY PAINT $183.38 PAINT SUPPLIES 158295 CHRIS CERVELLONE $310.00 FIRE LOSS CLAIM REIMB. 1511296 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $17,428.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 158297 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $158.40 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 168298 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $1.167.85 LAB SUPPLIES 168299 COUCH&SONS $24,923.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 158300 JOHN COLLINS $27.41 EXPENSE REIMB. 168301 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $10.197.10 ELECTRIC PARTS 158302 CONSUMER PIPE $609.03 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 04/11/07 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/18/97 POSTING DATE 04/16/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 168303 CONTROL CONCEPTS $291.52 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158304 ADI CONTROL TECHNIQUES,INC. $568.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158305 CORPORATE EXPRESS $906.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158305 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $42.57 TRUCK PARTS 156307 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $807.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 168308 COVEY LEADERSHIP CENTER $35.95 VIDEO PREVIEW 158309 DAILY PILOT $314.60 NOTICES&ADS 158310 J.W.D'ANGELO CO.,INC. $428.85 BUILDING MATERIALS 156311 DELL MARKETING L.P. $3.272.37 COMPUTERS 158312 DICKSONS $1.336.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158313 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2,261.16 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 158314 JERRY DOSS $05.00 FIRE LOSS CLAIM REIMB. 158316 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $1,065.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 155316 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $13.876.00 EMPLOYEE DISHONESTY/FAITHFUL PERFOR.BOND INS, 158317 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $517.31 TRUCK PARTS 158318 EDISON RAC $1,900.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158319 ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING $656.00 SUBSCRIPTION 158320 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC, $546.15 LAB SERVICES 158321 DAVID ERDKAMP $580.00 FIRE LOSS CLAIM REIMB. 158322 FAIRBANKS SCALES INC $480.00 SCALES MAINTENANCE F„ 158323 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $564.65 AIR FREIGHT rt 158324 FIBERTRON $660.72 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 0+ 158325 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURA $450.00 PUBLICATION N 158326 FIRST PRIORITY COMPUTERS $76.00 CONFUTER REPAIR 158327 FISCHER S PORTER CO. $1,107.45 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 158328 DEAN FISHER 521.00 FIRE LOSS CLAIM REIMS. 158329 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $222.05 LAB SUPPLIES 158330 FLAT&VERTICAL,INC. $236.50 CONCRETE CUTTING 168331 FLOSYSTEMS $748.91 PUMP PARTS 168332 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $12.76 PHOTO SUPPLIES 158333 THE FOXBORO CO. $3.894.64 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158334 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $671.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158335 FRAZEE PAINT&WALLCOVERING $94.39 PAINT 158336 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $1.295.66 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES 158337 CITY OF FULLERTON $81.15 WATER USE 158338 GST,INC. 53,570.85 OFFK:E SUPPLIES 158339 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2.228.27 CHEMICALS 158340 THE GARTNER GROUP $45,000.00 SUBSCRIPTION 158341 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $375.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 158342 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $142.73 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS 158343 GENERAL PETROLEUM $9,343.80 UNLEADED GASOLINE 158344 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,356.78 TELEPHONE SERVICES 158345 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $43,203.07 PUMP PARTS 158346 N.GLANTZ&SON INC. $38.25 TOOLS 158347 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $12,965.64 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158348 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $88.10 PRINTING y FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04111/97 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04116M7 POSTING DATE 04/16/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158349 DGA CONSULTANTS $4,606.37 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.S.8-94 158350 WILLIAM HAMILTON AND ASSOCIATE $585.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158351 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,646.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158352 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $8,234.82 TRUCK PARTS 158353 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $10,217.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES 158354 HOME DEPOT $712.11 SMALL HARDWARE 158355 J.T.HORVATH 5 ASSOC. $300.00 FIRE LOSS CLAIM REIMB. 158356 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $366.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 158357 HUNSAKER BASSOC IRVINE.INC $1.834.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158358 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,668.81 WATER USE 158359 IPCO SAFETY $870.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES 158360 ISCO,INC. $969.75 INSTRUMENT 158361 IMAGING PLUS $2,366.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158362 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $312.53 CONNECTORS 158363 INORGANIC VENTURES $820.05 LAB SUPPLIES 158364 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $3.54 WATER USE 158365 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $224.12 PRINTINO 158366 JAMISON ENGINEERING $42.580.84 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 158367 JAYS CATERING $1,089.85 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 158368 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,211.50 ELECTRIC PARTS t,. 158369 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $17,869.92 FERRIC CHLORIDE NO 9-27-95 rt 158370 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 INVENTORY SEMINAR 0Y 158371 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $652.77 MACHINE SUPPLIES w 155372 KIT KITTRELL $139.96 FIRE LOSS CLAIM REIMB. 150373 KNO%INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,186.52 TOOLS 158374 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,316.54 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 158375 JAMES D.LAWHON $123.90 FIRE LOSS CLAIM REIMB. 158376 SANDRA LEE $213.00 FIRE LOSS CLAIM REIMB. 158377 LEXIS-NEXIS $232.00 SUBSCRIPTION 158378 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $714.33 JANITORIAL SERVICES 158379 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. $8,000.00 OCEAN MONITORING 158380 MPS $37.67 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 158381 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $554.94 WELDING SUPPLIES 158382 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $2.230,393.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2 158383 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $261,151.95 CONSTRUCTION PIA1,P143 158384 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $76,90.40 CONSTRUCTION PI10-2(RESID),P247-2(REBID) I58385 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $147.55 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158386 GREG MATHEWS $936.94 EXPENSE REIMB. 158387 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $1.624.29 EXPENSE REIMB, I58388 MC JUNKIN CORP $3.561.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158389 LARRY W.MCLEMORE $625.00 FIRE LOSS CLAIM REIMB. 158390 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO $1,086.86 PAINTING SUPPLIES 158391 MESA MUFFLER $414.77 TRUCK PARTS 158392 MICROFLJEX MEDICAL CORP $608.00 LAB SUPPLIES 158393 MIDWAY MFG.$MACHINING $850.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 158394 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $198.26 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/11/97 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/16/97 POSTING DATE 04/1SM7 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158395 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $344.80 OFFICE TRAILER LEASE 158395 MONITOR LABS $2,520.50 INSTRUMENT 158397 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $233.62 PUMP PARTS 158398 NASCO $632.41 VALVE 158399 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $1,288.13 INSTRUMENT PARTS 158400 HUAN NGUYEN $781.63 EXPENSE REIMS. 168401 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $97.40 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 168402 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2.466.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158403 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $890.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 158404 ORACLE CORPORATION $5.200.00 SOFTWARE 158405 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $189A3 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 168406 ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER $129.43 SUBSCRIPTION 158407 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2.397.07 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158408 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,917.09 FITTINGS 155409 ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $735.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158410 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,821.87 SPECIALTY GASES 158411 COUNTY OF ORANGE $2.445.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 158412 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $11,873.93 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 155413 COUNTY OF ORANGE $50.00 PERMITFEE 155414 PSI $494.87 HARDWARE ISU15 PACIFIC PARTS&CONTROLS,INC. $37,919.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS R 158416 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $270.96 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 156417 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,765.21 TIRES a 158418 PEERLESS WIPING MATERIALS $72IS3 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158419 PERMA PURE INC. $9.533.93 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158420 PERMA SEAL $559.68 LUBE OIL 158421 PERVO PAINT $938.50 PAINT 158422 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $1,110.95 REIMS.PETTY CASH 158423 PITNEY BOWES $331.42 POSTAGE METER 158424 POLYPURE,INC. $8,778.16 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 158425 PORTSUPPLY $269.37 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ISU26 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $543.56 CHEMICALS 158427 POWER DESIGN $3,519.35 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 155428 PRICECOSTOO MEMBERSHIP $30.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE 158429 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $96.0O ICE FOR SAMPLES 158430 PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS PUBLICATIONS $195.50 PUBLICATIONS 168431 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. $59.95 PUBLICATIONS 1 SM32 PU ZMEISTER,INC. $680.15 PUMP PARTS 155433 PRYOR RESOURCES INC. $35S00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158434 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $198.11 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 158435 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $150.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 159436 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,002.72 TRASH REMOVAL 1SM37 RANCHO AUTO WASH $283.50 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 158438 RAND MATERIALS HANDLING $1,232.55 MATS 158439 RED WING SHOES $134.47 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 158440 BOLT DELIVERY $132.00 FREIGHT FUND NO 9199 - H DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/11197 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/1697 POSTING DATE 04I1697 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 155441 THE REGENTS OF THE $155.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 155442 THE REGISTER $749.70 NOTICES&ADS 158443 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $560.00 OCEAN MONITORING 158444 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $576.51 ELECTRIC PARTS 158445 REMEDYTEMP $26,0W.39 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 158446 RICHARDSON ENGINEERING SER,INC. $1,890.50 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158447 ROSEMOUNT.INC. 5174.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 158448 MARCY ROTHENBERG $630.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158449 SCESA(SO CA EMERG SERV ASSOC) $160.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 158450 SCAOS4D SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES $767.21 SUBSCRIPTIONS 156451 PAUL SAGBERG/HAGASTUBBEN 15 $800.00 PRESENTATION-OPERATIONS&MAINT.PRACTICES 158452 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $205.956.42 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.64L94 155453 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $156.445.28 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 158454 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $436.49 SPECIALTY GASES 158455 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $233.00 LAB REPAIRS 158466 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $93.95 WATER USE 158457 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $784.80 TOOLS 158458 SHASTA ELECTRIC $59,021.60 CONSTRUCTION JJI-2 158459 SHERATON ANAHEIM HOTEL $75.00 USER PERMIT REFUND 168460 SHURELUCK SALES $3.198.16 TOOLS/HARDWARE F.. 158461 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $99.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158462 SMITH-EMERY CO. $7.140.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 0j 158463 HUGH SOULAGES $85.00 FIRE LOSS CLAIM REIMS. In 158464 SOUTH COAST WATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES 158465 SO CALIF EDISON CO $1.870.83 POWER 158466 SO CALIF EDISON CO $3,163.92 POWER 158467 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $21.505.55 NATURAL GAS 158468 STAMINET INC $6,983.84 COMPUTER 158469 STERLING MEDICAL $283.04 MATS 158470 STEVEN ENTERPRISES $38,496.93 PLOTTER 158471 SUMMIT STEEL $618.49 METAL 166472 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $8.25 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 158473 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1,478.93 CHEMICALS 158474 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $538.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 168475 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $558,464.99 CONTRUCTION P2-36-3,P246,P1-38.5,P2-55 158476 TCH ASSOCIATES $792.03 LAB SUPPLIES 158477 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $35,905.78 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 158478 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2.232.97 MECHANICAL PARTS 158479 TORNELL&GOTTEN $2,170.80 LEGAL FEES 158480 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $3,730.36 TRUCK PARTS 158481 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,973.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5.11-94 155482 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $305.58 TRUCK PARTS 158483 TRUCK PARTS SUPPLY $150.29 TRUCK PARTS 158484 TRUESDAIL LABS $362.00 LAB SERVICES 155485 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $1.580.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS 158486 TULE RANCH/MADAN FARMS $69,323.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0411M97 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04116IB7 POSTING DATE 04/16/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158487 US RENTALS,INC. $291.00 BOOM EXTENSION FOR CRANE 158488 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $974.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 155489 UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX $1,350.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158490 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $238.00 LAB SUPPLIES 158491 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2,636.96 LABSUPPUES 158492 VALCOM $151.93 SOFTWARE 158493 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,126.21 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158494 VARKEL CONTRUCTION INC $21.076.20 CONSTRUCTION J-11-2 158495 VISTAR $72.13 BUILDING MATERIALS 158496 WACKENHUT CORP. $7.806.96 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 158497 WILLIAM WALLIN $562.32 EXPENSE REIMS. 158498 CARL WARREN 8 CO. $1,033.57 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 158499 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $264.72 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 158500 WAXIE $208.78 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 158501 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $154.48 WIND SOC FRAME 158502 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $11,905.78 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95 158503 WESTERN STATES CORROSION $325.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158504 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $122.61 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158505 NANCY WHEATLEY $561.50 EXPENSE REIMS. 158506 JUDITH A.WILSON $485.10 CELLULAR PHONE 8 EXPENSE REIMS. 158507 WTTEG $221.48 LAB SUPPLIES 158508 XEROX CORP. $10.160.15 COPIER LEASES 158509 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1,898.T7 LAB SUPPLIES 'bl 158510 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $231.84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158511 ZYMARK CORP. $2.805.00 SOFTWARE TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/16/96 $4,668,73S97 FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/11/97 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04N6/97 POSTING DATE 04/16/97 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $165.00 #2 OPER FUND $5,971.87 #2 CAP FAC FUND $1,834.00 #3 OPER FUND $12.081.66 #3 CAP FAC FUND $1,220.00 #5 OPER FUND $177.74 #6 OPER FUND $150.00 #7 OPER FUND $696.76 #7 CAP FAC FUND $749.70 011 OPER FUND $3.340.41 #11 CAP FAC FUND $24.942.09 05&8 OPER FUND $224.62 #S&7 OPER FUND $74.84 #7&14 OPER FUND $3.536.21 JT OPER FUND $611.876.46 CORF $3,596.494.98 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $169.352.78 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $235.856.95 Y N 54,865,735.97 Y FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/26*7 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/30/97 POSTING DATE 04/30/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158637 A-1 ALL AMERICAN ROOFING $13,484.00 RE-ROOF POWER BUILDING AT PLANT 150538 ATB T-CELLULAR CR BR $7.34 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158539 ATB T-MEGACOM SERVICE $843.30 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158540 AT&T-CELLULAR CR BR $6.69 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158541 AWSI $7,495.68 D.O.T.TRAINING PROGRAM 158542 AARON BROTHERS INC $258 43 FRAMES 158543 ACCURATE AIR ENGINEERING $167.05 FILTERS 158544 ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEM $276,94 HOSE 158W AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1,627S9 SPECIALTY GASSES 15850 AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS $37,33290 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89 168647 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $528A7 MECHANICAL PARTS 158548 AMERICAN AIRLINES $5,502.50 TRAVEL SERVICES 158549 AMERICAN CRANE INSTITUTE $2,975.00 SAFETY TRAINING 158550 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $846.00 PUBLICATION 158551 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $81.46 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 158552 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $10,348.44 NOTICES&ADS 168653 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $235.00 LAB SERVICES 158554 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $3.104.76 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158555 ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS $91,197.20 SOFTWARE LICENSES 158556 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158557 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO $135.82 FILTERS M 158558 BALBOA BAY CLUB $1.320.87 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT RETREAT MEETING p1 158559 BANANA BLUEPRINT $3.701.25 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 I 158560 BANKOFAMERICA $27.55 BANKING SERVICES 158561 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $556.85 PUBLICATIONS 158562 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $133.29 BATTERIES 158563 BAUDVILLE,INC. $134.45 FRAMES 158564 BAUER COMPRESSOR $40.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS 158565 BIO-GRO DIVISION $31,688.12 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO4-26.95 158566 BIOSOURCE PUBLISHING $175.00 SUBSCRIPTION 158567 BLACK BOX CORP 5254.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158668 BLAIR-MARTIN CO,INC. $1,021.99 VALVE MANIFOLDS 158569 LAURIE BLUESTEIN $1,071.54 EXPENSE REIMS. 158570 BUDGET JANITORIAL $2.837.50 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1.12.94 158571 BNI BOOKS $338.03 PUBLICATIONS 158572 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $61.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158573 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $13,540.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-94 158574 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $7,202.30 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 158575 CS COMPANY $4.517.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158576 CALTROL,INC. $8,250.86 HARDWARE 158577 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $380.20 SERVICE AGREEMENT 158578 CALIF UTILITIES EMER ASSOC $95.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 158579 CALIF URBAN WTR CON COUNCIL $250.00 SUBSCRIPTION 158560 CANUS CORPORATION $587.16 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 158681 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $16.746.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 5.24-95 158582 CASADA CONSTRUCTION CO 52,925.00 SINK HOLE REPAIR FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/25/97 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/J0/97 POSTING DATE 04/30/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158583 CASHCO INC. $62.30 VALVE PARTS 158584 MARK CASTILLO $784.58 EXPENSE REIMS. 158585 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $1289.77 OFFICE FURNITURE 158586 COAST CRANE COMPANY $3,510.50 CRANE RENTAL 158587 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $50522 LAB SUPPLIES 158588 JAMES E.COLSTON $533.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 158589 COMMUNITY ACTIONIFAP $950.00 DISTRICT SHARE OF EAP 158590 CONFIDENTIAL MGMT SERVICES $7.877.21 INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES 158591 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $54.77 TRUCK PARTS 158592 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL $3,988.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 158593 CONSUMER PIPE $535.39 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158594 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $3,688.48 ENGINE PARTS 158595 COPELCO CAPITAL $1,432.00 COLOR COPIER LEASE 158596 CORPORATE EXPRESS $2,146.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158597 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,670.83 ELECTRIC PARTS 158598 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS $7,370.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 158599 CALIF STATE UNIVERSITY $41.45 PUBLICATIONS 51 158600 CUSTOM CONTROL SENSORS,INC $698.92 PISTON SWITCH 15BB01 DAPPER TIRE $730.44 TIRES 1. 158502 DELL MARKETING L.P. $41.776.76 COMPUTERS 158603 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $1,140.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS �T 158604 DIAMOND H RECOGNITION $4.055.11 SERVICE AWARDS 00 158605 DIONEX CORP. $4,314.08 EXTRACTION CELL t� 158606 ROBERT DUMITY $1,019.71 EXPENSE REIMB. 158607 PAMELA E.DUNN $125.00 ON-SITE SEMINAR 158608 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $590.90 PAINT SUPPLIES 158609 EDD $14,758.70 REIMBURSABLE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 158610 EAGLE DISTRIBUTION $274.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 158611 J.D.EDWARDS $58,440.35 SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7.24-96 158612 ELECTRIC MACHINERY $1.787.57 ELECTRIC PARTS 153613 KENNETH J EMANUELS&ASSOC $1,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158614 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.5-24-95 158615 EVANS CONSOLES $19,690.71 OFFICE FURNITURE 158616 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $188.80 AIR FREIGHT 158617 THE FEED BARN $795.16 OUTDOOR FURNITURE 158618 FIBERTRON $3.636.56 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 158619 FILTERLINE CORP $620.03 FILTERS 168620 FLICKINGER CO $488.30 VALVE 158621 FLOSYSTEMS INC. $201.02 PUMP PARTS 158622 FLORIDA CONVEYOR&EQUIP $5,886.42 ROLLERS 15BB23 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $13.31 PHOTO SUPPLIES 158524 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1.610.26 PAINTSUPPLIES 158625 THE FOXBORO CO. 8662h6 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158526 FRANCOEUR ENGINEERING SVCS INC $4.986.25 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158627 AMOT CONTROLS CORP. $523.88 VALVE PARTS 156626 FRYS ELECTRONICS $1,652.05 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/2597 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/3097 POSTING DATE 04/30/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158629 GKK CORPORATION $6,595.97 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158630 GNEIL COMPANIES $568.97 DISPLAY SUPPLIES 158631 EST,INC. $32,901.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158632 GARRAT7-CALLAHAN COMPANY $211.19 CHEMICALS 158633 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $64.35 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 158634 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $5,040.35 TELEPHONE SERVICES 158635 GEORGETOWN PUBLISHING $97.00 SUBSCRIPTION 158636 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC WHOLESALE $4,252.90 ELECTRICAL PARTS 158637 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $2,721.00 PRINTING 158638 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $2.366.51 CYLINDER REPAIR 158639 DGA CONSULTANTS $4,114.14 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.64L94 158640 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $214.00 TRUCK PARTS 150641 WILLIAM HAMILTON AND ASSOCIATE $350.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158642 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $10,402.31 MECHANICAL PARTS 158643 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,T74.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158844 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $374.66 TRUCK PARTS 158645 PL HAWN 0O.INC. $3,852.23 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 158646 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 158647 HIGH410INT RENDEL $14,098.55 CONSULTING SERVICES 158648 HILTI,INC. $2,251.76 TOOLS r, 158649 HOME DEPOT $959.26 SMALL HARDWARE r* 158650 HR DIRECT $123.34 LABOR LAW POSTERS I�1 158651 IBM $324.00 SERVICE CONTRACT 158652 IBM CORPORATION-WAY $4,OOD.00 AS400 HARDWARE 158653 IPCO SAFETY $5,710.95 SAFETY SUPPLIES 158654 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. $1,304.19 SAFETY SHOES 158656 INTELLIGENCE PRESS,INC. $687.00 SUBSCRIPTION 158656 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $55.02 WATER USE 158657 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $1,688.05 PRINTING 158658 JP MORGAN SECURITIES $22,758.90 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 158659 JAMISON ENGINEERING $985.D0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 158660 JAYS CATERING $1,774.25 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 158661 JOHN JACOBS ASSOCIATES $1,512.6D MACHINERY REPAIR 158662 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $595.3D ELECTRIC PARTS 158663 KEENAN SUPPLY $146.50 WELDING SUPPLIES 158664 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $53,127.65 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO9-27-95 158665 KENSINGTON GARDENS MOBILEHOME $75.00 PERMIT REFUND 158666 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH $2,691.60 MACHINE SUPPLIES 158667 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.651.20 TOOLS 158668 KOMAX SYSTEMS INC $193.04 LINE STRAINER SCREENS 158669 LASERALL CORP. $221.52 PRINTER REPAIR 158670 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $30.00 MEETING REGISTRATION 158671 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $40,737.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES 158672 LEXIS,IYAMATO.BRISBOIS $3.159.68 PATTERSON CLAIM 158673 LEXIS-NEXIS $291.75 SUBSCRIPTION 158674 LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $139.25 AUTO PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OU25/97 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0430/97 POSTING DATE 0//30/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158675 MIRIAM LOYD $1,081.54 EXPENSE REIMB. 150676 S0004LYNCH CORP. $94.77 JANITORIAL SERVICES 158677 MPS $225.54 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 158678 MSA $74.51 SENSOR 158679 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $2,071.45 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 158680 MANDIC MOTORS $65.00 TOWING SERVICES 158681 MANAGEMENT ACTION PROGRAMS $2.400.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158682 MARELL LEGAL PRODUCTS $277.54 SOFTWARE 158683 DENISE MARTINEZ $310.47 EXPENSE REIMB. 158694 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S268.82 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158685 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $68.07 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 15W86 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $432.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 15W87 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $4.976.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 158688 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $176.69 SAFETY GLASS 158689 MISSION INDUSTRIES $9,816.20 UNIFORM RENTALS 158690 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $116.00 INSTRUMENT 158681 MOBILE MODULAR MANAGEMENT CORP $344.60 OFFICE TRAILER LEASE 158692 MONITOR LABS $1,519.60 INSTRUMENT 1SN93 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $701.45 PUMP PARTS 158694 NATIONALTECHNOLOGY TRANSFER $8.20525 OWSITE TRAINING N. 158695 NETWORK CATALYST,INC $500.26 POWER SUPPLY rt 158696 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $440.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS 01 158697 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $53.30 WATER USE ,p 158698 HICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $282.84 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 158699 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $181.73 SAFETY GLASSES 15870D OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $2,44BA9 OFFICE SUPPLIES 158701 THEOHMARTCORP $5,395.57 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158702 ORACLE CORPORATION $5,164.78 SOFTWARE 158703 ORANGE COUNTY PUMP CO $3,916.07 PUMP 158704 ORANGE COUNTY REPORT $236.00 SUBSCRIPTION 158705 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $375.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 158708 ORRICK HERRINGTON B SUTCLIFFE $35,D00.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 168707 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1,800.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 150708 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $47,855.30 GAP WATER USE M.O.&9-93 15B709 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $155.59 OPERATING SUPPLIES 150710 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $13,189.38 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 158711 PACIFIC BELL $1,30517 TELEPHONE SERVICES 158712 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $1.905.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1SB713 PAGENET $354.13 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 158714 PAN ENERGY TRADING&MARKET S47,901.31 NATURAL GAS 158715 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $376,50 TIRES 155716 PARTS UNLIMITED $578 09 TRUCK PARTS 158717 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $284,16 LAB SUPPLIES 158718 PERVO PAINT $155.16 PAINT 158719 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $1,140,77 REIMB.PETTY CASH 158720 PHARR-PALOMAR INC. $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 04125N7 PAGE5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/30/W POSTING DATE 04I30/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158721 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $86,895.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29-95 158722 US FILTER POLYMETRICS INC - $1.262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 158723 POLYPURE,INC. $33,346.77 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11.92 158724 POWER DESIGN $4,766.09 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 168725 POWER SYSTEMS 5426.46 FILTERS 158726 MIKE PRLICH 8 SONS $201.328.08 CONSTRUCTION 3-35R-1 158727 PROLIFICS $5.625.00 SOFTWARE 158728 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $50.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 158729 PRYOR RESOURCES,INC. 5445.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 158730 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $299.58 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 158731 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $1,495.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158732 HIPOTRONICS,INC. $3.798.18 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 158733 RJN GROUP,INC. $1,250.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 155734 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 54,187.65 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 155735 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $622.60 LAB SUPPLIES 155736 REALTIME $255.00 INTEGRATION B SUPPORT SERVICES 158737 BOLT DELIVERY AND/OR $103.00 FREIGHT 168138 THE REGENTS,UNIVERSITY OF $215.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 158739 REMEDYTEMP $16,172.49 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 158740 ROMAC SUPPLY COMPANY $2.541.71 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES W 158741 ANDREW ROZENSTRATEN $1,063.64 EXPENSE REIMB. rt 158742 SKC WEST $73.83 SAFETY SUPPLIES p1 158743 JAN SCLERFIG $595.81 EXPENSE REIMB. 158744 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $627.52 SPECIALTY GASES 158745 SEA COAST DESIGNS $579.69 LAB SUPPLIES 158746 SEARS ROEBUCK 8 CO $781.70 TOOLS 158747 SECONDBUN $550.28 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 156748 STUART SEVERN $1,071.74 EXPENSE REIMB. 158749 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,217.38 TOOLS 158750 SHASTA ELECTRIC $2,498.00 CONSTRUCTION-PLANT 2 CEN-GEN 156751 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $1,031.90 TRUCK PARTS 158752 SHURELUCK SALES $3,406.41 TOOLS/HARDWARE 158753 M.E.SILBERMANN COMPANY $24,959.00 SEWER REPAIRS 158754 SKALAR,INC $962.44 LAB SUPPLIES 158755 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $445.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 168756 SMITH-EMERY CO. $2,771.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 158757 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY $344.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158758 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $153.60 PERMIT FEES 158759 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES 158760 SO CALIF EDISON CO $3.144.05 POWER 158761 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $507.28 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 158762 SPRINT $33.60 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 158763 KEITH D STOLZENBACH $3,600.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158764 STRATEGIC FRAMEWORKS,INC. 122,260.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 155765 SUNSET FORD $736.22 TRUCK PARTS 158766 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PARTS $81.55 HYDRAULIC HOSE } FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 04/25/97 PAGE 5 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/30197 POSTING DATE 04/30/97 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 158767 SUPELCO,INC. $655.01 LAB SUPPLIES 158768 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $8.87 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 158769 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG,COMPANY $321.47 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 158770 TEL-A-TRAIN INC. $5,025.20 TRAINING VIDEOS 158771 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS 5804.75 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 158772 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $438.91 MECHANICAL PARTS 158773 ROBERT THOMPSON $1.135.17 EXPENSE REIMB. 158774 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 158776 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $306.65 LOCKS&KEYS 158776 TORNELL&COTTEN $4,584.60 LEGAL FEES 158777 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $4,633.54 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5.11.94 158778 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $406.20 TRUCK PARTS 158779 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $542.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 158780 MICHELLE TUCHMAN $99.87 EXPENSE REIMB. 158781 TULE RANCHBMGAN FARMS $38,703.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL 158782 UNIQUE CREATIONS $510.00 REFINISH CONFERENCE ROOM TABLE 158783 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $431.13 PARCEL SERVICES 168764 UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX $750.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION ISB785 VWR SCIENTIFIC 56,320.89 LAB SUPPLIES 158786 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $928.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 158787 VERNE'S PLUMBING $9,872.64 PLUMBING SERVICES 158788 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1.190.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT tI 158789 VILLA MAGOLIA MOBILEHOME $75.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 168790 VISION SERVICE PLAN-(CA) $7.952.70 VISION SERVICE PLAN PREMIUM 158791 WACKENHUTCORP. 54,094.16 CONTRACT SERVICESECURITY GUARDS 158792 WASTE MARKETS $37,228.77 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3-27-96 158793 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $13.30 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 158794 WEIGH TRONIX,INC. $387.86 SCALE REPAIR ISB795 WESTERN METRO UNIT $562.95 FILTERS 158796 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $9.853.10 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 158797 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $885.89 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 155798 ROY F WESTON INC $3,757.35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158799 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN&SMART $125,317.96 LEGAL SERVICES MO7-26-95 158800 XEROX CORP. $2,903.65 COPIER LEASES 158801 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $865.36 LAB SUPPLIES 168802 YOST&SON INC.,CHEM FEED SYS $2.452.94 JAR MIXER TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/30/96 $1,64Z679.63 FUND NO 9199 - ,R DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0425197 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/3097 POSTING DATE 049097 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $80.00 #1 CONST FUND $2,310.48 #2 OPER FUND $18,990.43 #2 CAP FAC FUND $1,117.39 #2 CONST FUND $5.354.05 #3 OPER FUND $7,82D.58 03 CAP FAC FUND $237,671.74 #3 CONST FUND $7,740.30 #5 OPER FUND $1,195.41 #6 OPER FUND $75.00 #6 CONST FUND $1,617.46 07 OPER FUND $3,473.52 07 CAP FAC FUND $1.989.51 #7 CONST FUND $1,732.86 #11 OPER FUND $843.12 #11 CAP FAC FUND $6.87 r, #11 CONST FUND $3,003.72 r* #586 OPER FUND $16.59 �1 #586 CAP FAC FUND $14,932.67 #687 OPER FUND $216.49 #7814 OPER FUND $4,160.66 IT OPER FUND $682,276.74 CORF $336.038.60 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $24,334.91 Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL $284,700.60 $1,642,679.63 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE-VARIOUS PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 05/16M7 159050 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF $34.374.00 DENTAL INSURANCE 05H6/97 159051 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE $5,250.15 LIFE INSURANCE 05/1697 159052 NWL ANDIOR $773.70 LIFE INSURANCE 05/1697 159053 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $26.402.09 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 05/1697 159054 PARAMOUNT FABRICATORS $60,000.00 RELEASE STOP NOTICE 11-17A SETTLEMENT 05/28/97 159339 LAURIE BLUESTEIN $1,071.54 EXPENSE REIMS. 0528/97 159340 RON DEWIT $173.11 SETTLEMENT 052897 159341 JOHN COLLINS $350.D0 CASH ADVANCE 0528/97 159342 JAN DERAY $350.00 CASH ADVANCE 052897 159343 FAMILY HEALTH PLAN $29.429.02 MEDICAL INSURANCE 0528197 159344 TERRY THROOP $84.07 EXPENSE REIMS. OW30197 159345 THE CITY ASSOCIATES,INC. $15,687.50 HEARING OFFICER 05/3097 159346 FAMILY HEALTH PLAN $29.836.13 MEDICAL INSURANCE 050097 159347 J.D.LINCOLN&MELISSA LINCOLN $10,00D.00 NEWPORT SPILL O5130197 159348 METRA HEALTH $115,230.80 MEDICAL INSURANCE TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $329.012.11 M- tf f] SUMMARY AMOUNT #11 CAP FAC FUND $60,000.00 JT OPER FUND $15,687.50 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $W,402.09 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $216,922.52 $329.012.11