The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996-11-20 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA November 14, 1996 NOTICE OF MEETING pM1One: JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 1714)962.2411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 mean,P.G.Box 8127 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Fountain Valle,CA 9272"127 WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 20, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. spear address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain V 9270-770 8 DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Member The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Agena 0 Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will CIGes be held at the above location, time and date. Anaheim / - Bare /! Buena Perk Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton and ec etary Huntington Beech l J wine La Hahra L. Palma Los Alemitae Nava.1t Beech Tentatively - Scheduled Upcoming Meetings Orange Placentia Same Ana Seat Beech AD HOC COMMITTEE RE - Thursday,December 5, 1996, at 5:00 p.m. st.nt.n Tustin STRATEGIC PLAN mu. Ville Perk Yarba Linda County of orange FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION AND - Wednesday,December 11, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Beall Districts Cost. Md. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 18, 1996, at 5:30 p.m. Garden Grove Midwey City water DI.p'icta Irvine Ranch A PubLc Wastewater and Environmental Management Agency Committed to Protecting the Environment since 1954 JOINT BOARD MEETING DATES Month Joint Board Meeting December Dec 18, 1996 January Jan 22, 1997 February Feb 26, 1997 March Mar 26, 1997 April Apr 23, 1997 May May 28, 1997 June June 25, 1997 July July 23, 1997 August August 27, 1997 September September 24, 1997 October October 22, 1997 November November 19, 1997 December December 17, 1997 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r A November 14, 1996 phone: (714)962 241 1 To the Chair and Members mailing address: Po. Box 6127 of the Joint Boards of Directors Faurnam valley CA 92728e127 Subject: Board Letter spree,addreea: 1 a44 Ellis Avenue Fountain valley09-7 CA The followingare items that you may find interesting. If you need additional 927o9aDCA Y Y 9 information on any of the items, please call me. Orange county Investment Pool Update Member Attached is an October 31, 1996 FAX from Patrick C. Shea updating the OCIP Ag'"G05 members on the status of the lawsuit. • Cities Strategic Plan Progress Report A"eBr/ea Attached is a report dated November 4, 1996, detailing the progress and schedule for Baena Park the Strategic Plan. Please note that the next Directors Workshop is scheduled for Cypress January 25, 1997 between 9 and Noon, and I encourage you to attend. Founnal Valley Fullerton HunUrgmn Beach SCAP Appoints Blake Anderson as Orange County Director Irvine La Habra At their October 29, 1996 Board meeting, the Southern California Alliance of Publicly La Putsemito Las Ala s Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) appointed Chief Administrative Officer Blake Newport Beach Anderson as its Orange County Director. SCAP, with a membership of approximately Orange 50 people from public agencies, reviews a wide range of legislative and regulatory Pn.Ar e sal a issues impacting POTWs in Southern California, including air quality, biosolids and seal Beach water quality. swn[on r sun Letter of Appreciation Villa Park yorba Linea Attached is a copy of an October 25, 1996 letter to Nancy Wheatley, Director of county of orange Technical Services, from Silverado Constructors which demonstrates how the Districts are committed to facilitating solutions to problems. eenftaa y Districts Costa Mesa Orange County RegisterArticle on Special Districts Gorden Grove Mldwey Ely Attached is a copy of an article from the October 24, 1996 Register on Special water Districts Districts—are they still needed in O.C.7 Gary Slreed, Director of Finance, was asked to provide the information, however, it was misconstrued and resulted in inaccurate fn-;ne Ranch figures. If you have questions, please contact Gary at (714) 962-2411, ext. 2500. A Public Wastewa[er and Environmental Management Agency committed[a Protecting the Environment since 1954 Chair and Members of the Joint Boards of Directors Page 2 November 14, 1996 Orange County PROFILES Attached is a copy of the Orange County Center for Demographic Research newsletter, Orange County PROFILES, which outlines the projections on population, employment and housing for the next 25 years. Because we are in the middle of our Strategic Plan, this information is very important to us. Fundina for Boise Chica State Beach Repairs Attached is a November 12, 1996 memo with an attachment from the California Department of Finance, which addresses the issue of funding the repair of the Boise Chita State Beach's sewer system. A draft agreement will be prepared to assist the State with these repairs. General Election Results Also attached is a FAX from Eric Sapirstein, ENS Resources, Inc., which discusses how the new Congress may be more moderate on environmental issues during the 105th Congressional session. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. <`/ — Donald F. McIntyre General Manager DFM:jt Jiw�u+o L. Hoye Attachments: October 31, 1996 FAX from Patrick C. Shea Strategic Plan Progress Report dated November 4, 1996 October 25, 1996 letter from Silverado Contructors October 24, 1996 Article from the Register Fall 1996 Orange County PROFILES Newsletter November 12, 1996 memo re Funding for Bolsa Chica State Beach Repairs November 6, 1996 FAX from Eric Sapirstein re 105th Congress OCT 31 '96 16:50 FR PILLSRJRY MADISON 619 236 1995 TO 18 P.02 Pillebnry ♦rs AT W 101 W6r aRMalAYn IM �` y' SAN GE4Q CAIanWA93101Q19 ✓'SA`� jl iP1P➢HCN! (61�L4fWY lNL I6191 D0.1A5 hladlsOrt Q8[ Svtso LLP W,m'aa;m as®esa m.o: (619) 544-3177 October 31, 19,96 VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION TO: ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL PARTICIPANTS' DISTRIBUTION LIST Re: In Re Cmmty mf Orange Case No. 94-22272JR Dear Pool Participants: We continue to monitor the status of various post-confirmation issues in the County's bankruptcy case. With regard to the Option B Pool Participants' litigation against the County of Orange, on October 23, 19916 the Bankruptcy Court entered an order dismissing the action. The action was dismissed pursuant to a stipulation between the County of Orange and the Option B Pool Participants which was executed on May 16, 1996. We will continue to monitor the status of these post-confirmation issues and will periodically provide you with status reports. If you have my questions, please call me. Very y yours. Patrick C. Shea W: Official Investment Pool Participants Committee and Counsel (AN[+roo Wf MfM'YR[l>¢/Jl�f.Wlx'rt sap.U6]l!p sAN i41ATSCV su1QT1 V1 WApONC16V,nc 11R1'[ T o rW11r23. .w TOTAL PAGE.02 +� Strategic Plan Progress Report November 4, 1996 This report is on the progress of the Strategic Plan and its overall project status. Also, included is a detailed schedule of the upcoming planned goals and events. Completed Tasks (Sept.96-Oct. 96) Subiect RAC Workshop 1, September 12 Presented background material on the Districts existing rate structure PAC Workshop 1, September 19 Presented background material on peak flow management and stormwater impacts Quarterly Board Workshop, September 21 Reported status of Project 2, Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge Meeting with RWQCB Staff, September 30 General briefing on Strategic Plan, particularly the Ocean Discharge Options Ad Hoc Committee Meeting, October 9 Background briefing on Strategic Plan, determination of Committee's role RAC Workshop 2, October 24 Presented background material on issues that effect rates, including allocations of our 0&M and Capital Costs Planned Tasks (Nov. 96) Subiect Water Conservation Committee,November 4 Staff of several public agencies will explore a joint water conservation program PDC Meeting,November 7 Staff will review revised Strategic Plan Schedules PAC Workshop 2,November 14 Review results of land use and population projections; flow management options and evaluation criteria PHASE Work Com feted Project No. 1, Investigation and Repair of Ocean Ouifall, Job No. J-39 The consultant completed a draft report summarizing alternate ways to increase outfall capacity. The report was circulated to staff for comments;no comments were received. These alternatives were also discussed in general with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)on September 30. The RWQCB Staff indicated they were more concern with discharges through the 78-inch outfall than with discharges of secondary treated water into the Santa Ana River. These same alternatives are now being evaluated together with alternatives to reduce inflow and retard flows developed under Project No. 2. Specifications were prepared and proposals solicited from ten (10)diving firms for more investigative work on both outfalls. Only one proposal was submitted, at a cost of $264,000. This work was budgeted at$60,000. After extensive negotiations with the sole firm, it was decided to reject the bid and solicit new proposals. Next week, we plan to install a pressure measuring device on the 120-inch pipe just ahead of the diffuser in order to measure friction losses. Project 1 will be delayed because of the above reasons. Therefore,cleaning of the 120-inch outfall will probably now be done in the fall of 1997. erect No. 2.Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge,Job No. J-40-1 Note:Project meetings are generally held the second andfourth Tuesday ofeach month, 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. in Conference Room B. Project Staff and the Consultant have been working on the first volumes, which are expected next week for review. These are fifty percent (50%)submittals. I hope staff can set time aside to read them and participate in a future scheduled workshop to give comments. We have formed an active Planning Advisory Committee (PAC)with a good community cross-section. Support for this effort from our Communications and Engineering Departments has been excellent and is much appreciated. We completed our dry weather flow monitoring at some thirty (30)selected sites. This information will be used to verify discharge coefficients and as a base for I&I studies. An Intermin Flow Management Plan developed with Operations and Maintenance Staff will be completed in time for the current winter season. The project is thirty six percent(36%)completed and on schedule. An increase in funding for added public support will be presented to the Planning,Design and Construction(PDC) Committee on November 7, 1996. Prohrct No. 3.Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedules,Job No. J-40-2 To date we have held two (2)meetings of our Rate Advisory Committee (RAC). I'm concerned with the low attendance; the first meeting had eighteen of the twenty-eight proposed members and the second meeting had 13 out of 28. I am also concerned with the mix of this Committee; we now have predominately industrial and commercial interest. We have completed our rate survey; the results proved to be comparably lower than other wastewater agencies. We have developed land use data,strength and flow information, and preliminary cost allocations and numbers. PHASE II. Wastewater Treatments and Reuse Facilities, Job No. J-40-3 and FAASE III.Environmental Impact Report,Job No. J-40-4 We will present new schedules for completion of the Strategic Plan to the Planning, Design and Construction Committee on November 7, 1996. That Committee decided in September to delay the start of Phase III until Phase I is substantially complete. We plan to issue a Request for Proposal for Phase II in the next two weeks. I've met with the Orange County Water District on the idea of preparing a joint site layout to cover both our wastewater and reclamation needs.This meeting included exploring the possibility of combining our plant tours,and sharing maintenance and laboratory facilities. attachment: 11/12/96 1997 SCHEDULEDWORKSHOPS - - - — JANUARY RATE ADVISORY COMMRTEE(PAC)Men w/Eng.San on RAC Slides - - - Meet w/EMT on RAC Slides Dry Run --- — — - - — RAC Mailer RAC Meeting at Disuk:t Offices PLANNING ADVISORY COMMDTEE(PAC) PAC W Meat w/E .Slaff on PAC Slides 1 Management Components Mestw/EMTcn PACSlkKs 6t— Dry Run ----- 6 2 6 PAC Mailer 7 PAC Meeting at Dtetrkt Olfiees IB--d AD HOC COMMITTEE Meet w�Eng.Staff an Ad Hoc Slides Meet w%EMT on Ad Him Slides ry R Dun Ad Hoc Mailer Ad HOc Meetingat District Offices BOARD WORKSHOP Meet w/Eno.State on Bd.Wkshp Slides orkah 4 Meet w/EMTan Bd.Wkshp Slides Dry Run 2 Board Workshop Mailer 114 Board Iliflohip Mee tin at District Offices 15 WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Water Conservation Meeting at District Offices BOARD AND COMMRTEE MEETNW Board Meeting _ PDC Meek 7 OMT22 S Meeting S 2 FAHR — 8 HOLIDAYS S. Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Holiday Christmas Holiday New Years Da Purple- Workshop Meeting Date �+c+ucscexis Gray Holiday 1996 November 1996 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY ICirculate PAC 2 Slides(Draft)to Eng. A. Staff and EMT 4Receive comments Meet w/EMT on Dry Run DelWer PAC 2 slides to f/EMT on PAC 2 5 PAC 2 slides 2:00 6 PAC 2 3:OOp.m. I Communication&3up 8 9 Slides by 2:00 p.m. p.m. pg.format by 10:00 am. OMTS Meeting Water Conservation PAC Mailer Committee,9.1 la.m. City Mgr.Meeting PDC Meeting 10 11 Veteran's Day 12 Meet w/Eng. I 3 Workshop, p, 15es GR's to RAC 3 16 on RAC 3 Worksho Slid Storyboard FAHR Mtg. 9-II a.m. 10:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. I I QGR's to PAC I QGR's to RAC 20 Meet w/EMT 2 I GR's to RAC 22 GR's to RAC 23 vSlides Slides an RAC 3/ and Ad Hoc Slid and Ad Hoc Ad Hoc Slides Slides 9:00 am.- 12:00 p.m. Tom Dawes- Board Meeting Jury Duty 24 25 26 Mailr` 27°aesto 2gThanksgiving 29Holiday 30 Communicadona by&00&m. GR's—Graphic Revisions 1997 January 1997 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 1 Meet w/EMT GR's to PAC 3 4 New Years Day on PAC 3 and Slides Bd.Wkshp 4, 9:00 a.m.-12p.m. Deliver Slides to Communications GR's to PAC 3 GR's to PAC 3 PAC 3 Mailer GR's to Board GR's to Board 5 Slides 7Slides, Imaged and 8 9 Wkshop 4 Slides I0 Wkshop 4 11 Processed Slides Dry Run- PAC 3,2:00 p.m. OMITS/FAHR Mtg GR's to PAC Board 12 13 Hoard 4 Workshop 3 15 Wkshp 4 16 17 18 Slides, Imaged 9-11 a.m. Mailer and Processed Dry Run- Board Workshop 4 Meet WBoard 19 20 21 22 235aR to/ 24 25Wkshop4 RAC 4 9a.m:12p.m. 9:00 a.m: 12:00p.m. 26 27 28 Circulate Circulate 3 1 EMT Comments(/ RAC 4 slides to RAC 4 slides to EMT on Eng.Staff EMT RAC 4 slides due by 2:00 p.m. OR's - Waphlc Revisions 1996 December 1996 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY GR's to RAC 3 GR's to RAC 3/Ad GR's to RAC 3 and RAC 3 Mailer Slides Hoc Slides Imaged Ad Hoc Slides 5 6 Hanukkah 7 Imaged/Processed Ad Hoc 2 Dry Run- 5 P.M. RAC 3&Ad Hoc 9:OOa.m.- 12:OOp.m. PDC Meeting 8 9 10 11 12RAC W kshop 3 13 14 9a.m.-12:30pm 15 16 Water I Meet w/Eng. I Board Meeting 1 QCirculate PAC 3 20 2 1 Conservation Staff- PAC 3 8 7&Bd Wksh 4 Committee and Board Slides to EMT Mtg.2, 9.11 a.m. Workshop 4, by 9:D0 a.m. 9:00 a.m.-12d10 p.m. Commen22 23EMTontsC 24 25 26GR'stord 27andBord 28 EMT on PAC 3 and Board and Board Q &Bd Wkshp 4 Christmas Holiday Workshop 4 workshop 4 due by 1:00 p.m. Slides Slides 29 30 31 BR's - Graphic Revisions Silvefddo CON sr' rzuc:..r.(:)r;s October 25, 1996 DCN: S10850 Nancy Wheatly Director of Technical Services CSDOC P.O-Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Subject: CONTRACT NO.E94-01 EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR CSDOC/IRWD AGREEMENT Dear Nancy: I am writing to express our appreciation for your assistance in the development of the agreement to facilitate the discharge of construction groundwater to the sewer system as a part of construction of the Eastern Transportation Corridor. Your professionalism in assisting us with this unique request is indicative of your personal dedication and a positive reflection on CSDOC. We appreciate your candor during development of the agreement and your accommodation of the constraints imposed by our construction schedule; schedule is critical to the success of a design- build project. I wish you continued success in your position at CSDOC. Sincerely, Scott Taylor,P.E. Silverado Constructors Sri& cc: Donald McIntyre, CSDOC G.M. Stricklin, Silverado h:krcWeainMp)pd N TWENTY-Two EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE TWO HUNDRED, IRVIN(. CAI FORNIA 92614 PHONE 714-752-0990 FAX PHONE: 714-752-8959 The tan w wlRalWhm OBITUARIES and SOCIAL ISSUES Themosi Ga.E4 fwN Special districts - are they still needed in O.C.? GOVERNMENT:Vetere eWvl<u m lane to in.late a. Nblx.nd kanmtee the data we Lion mmmlan eppxvd mar' .Irdlue•. will derJde It eonedida- arn.wIS momui �ir::enrtnf xn make m,eppromm de. den Graki. .rnatxxv.. tylm.. rarh ena x r llama "'Mf h"I""Ixee or nxt[ GOB is the BBewer. 1e^ ^Pavel[ xY Wert Ian ra- IUWtivnm nut...... and dnJmOm,ena W,Y'n keel Mike . eN fan mar mi.,dl.mtl.-em Dw me ran 1 Ile Bx.a er supervlxn Ninno In...Y M myn:' mat fr0lCA ore2aW W a rMwtlanl d tlaebetbll iris lot Jptllwor Pmppm,al Be[. 10 - aMul Nelm to 'Ale n Jvry, .1[enry Agnter vmeal entem nl lwl reeler.A id er 1.1-wo l uran Ytan an., dw pane khan 1.Iry m tul nonfat maryL Tea Yxn LleG v�thn Jt Dur Dlppvl mete al lrvine led w and end dupl',aion, ll me miser ru p.r lo.m[xN ' peale'.vnvemmIJoe.are in rweElne loom rear eDo'eer rlunotal H.do[D a.ate,ena Meer- .Auemelr s rider Cyn 1 l:rdr xe too,'It kaki a..11 V<ry Illlle. lDue m.n artn'1,vine la pe xud-Lid uepNe eovn par Bman Nor S,lenMWJtlme WMoe Ilia a mnmxodWlim nplWletl.pi'to vn.NL Imuve meant xace•• 1' me Jive ollLu. 'in 0.."i Y.volenvW PogeervlWomuo 1.1 WJ d.leUOnnp Cwnrymatvdlr pA p.opoul la mmplelelY le - .to Moe ,.00.....0 didapmvm[P a... mwlr: led mi Set - be I do wand e Po.it, vo le Dri it WI N del in On nal Land am" orJn.ul uWnmla'..YJem- near Wa DWmm W tlouar. flit. ar eneld .gle De. _Dist Proam von. `Mt_ Lrwtwdefie ovefmvamea. ,ant M'ttxt doomed Orxee EI(hlNfmrJNanll epe[W al refillperttn1.i11.0eNIJin eau ll NtDextl Jy Wlllrew rtcnl Nel,iN aoavul<mwe C0un1Y1nrnlmml Yon.b..l l Malawi beMl Lie urnp led paD. IDedela W.11',Maulmple Me am [mtlenllWlraremmrnl. - menl WI)up in 14T.And Il vx b be^ee Ca1n1Y Eleclbn ,nor•,' - pu1N...drink In the .e.mau roremmme no Lot am Mk Wu.l ru wook ed 1To.e vxo min Nw. f weli 'Tx[eeeblrin,i ti neBJ< In1WWlrt. mtl.m[Jlx-Inetlm elxnJ am ornotlomnJllane.That 1, lust Lit Ya, v.er ena lever Iw wlanedxxm.onnepipx M D.n tmMenini ro[fLa Du. me Ou..Wn m Jmm Mi ram.Tallyer tat-d...Hell�[ oll.1.1..,at.' to 1. no Deanne mnmY Trunr tied brew So Met me M hid. u. P-none..Tier man n.r.l0 Nonew. ml I. ..do Y. tlm Aulnonlr Icunrnetl a In weed,comes. uJ nv. am , mmee me rant to make dead kite two vw.nm of mnetl3 Imt..it-it xe Mi.aer Dad io......In m0.ep.rne We, to Mae The m.d. thee. m t Inplo-1 ma .m. d.tlm. ..it xm a on weak vim teu.lud gen<It.. aem..nln...pennalemn., reake uad JMn Win...whin an at"' ei.M al.,Y.Hen. u.x-@ne aide firdemmMe Militia,-me hena.mmv filth Nve keplmN aovpm m be rtWIi m lM In t;nreb[Intl:mminp: me took[amid-.M leq 1. m take,Sam Allmeeeelen,snore Ne lha ctlllu uaM Illem"Ian In< Rm[x a er Delntl'. On Auy. 1 ken mare Ihm .11 Ywln^Wano and Denem. .vend. Ill Mort we ano , ,inble eorernmene WxY du, mad."Tbut lot of vo,t In 0 Yeer.of x.pvlinp. Onnpe .ne u ntt o Ih<b b.rdm yv IRY mlpxl wmDlne In the .1-1.mwq need JI dYl<rtnt pmpru.but of i I. do We Cmn1Y. real bdwcY Pema am m.nyen aM W Wane.b fill- Gauging income vs. outflow, SPECIAL o x ^ as .x ammwM districts seem flush with Cash DISTRICTS 4mnJv 11. �11e IN ORANGE ac Noe Oewei Me SE. -Ifs GOVERNMENT: Cridre xwoseatlm. COUNTY DC Wnoemwol u v fin% St malaB 11 the a.n.. 1pmindal6Nm.e ewer Man S.NJn y u soy that means your s..I....Manama 1...1.. Mande man,link Mb.xannM.n se IS �fpe NBter Mail beater astea kaki.,lfu x.<r M. mr.^JUIWx+ar Ged. Ipo at a, SSD col ¢air Yxr. Vntlww/teat reemv 3m pen tik 11.1 uW ere toO high. n..wt diemmmry.m menu" cwmrsamm�.s u u oe or la sldVA .[[read 1.111.R e.tt 1.tDe fmmMNn rwmv L.phLM [i al •I{ eM nay(o-n,/•que. aaMii xhen m O deem. skedied Ne. ream tan Ded. 1. ter �.0e Few NwWe kind ollW e awn v. mad,Inun Je.Openedu m vnpt.t•Irum W+mY yn chill 1. to ®4 t30x Cnew Star In lone Sam u. "%,enJ.lment hall,] Nowsnm ma CaMn3.neM.m LS 1.0 Ml,nwd_ Lime IS .l..me wdo Dud MI 1vam Cw'smed,.1. rl U lrr. The D WM W. fee �Je pat. Nµanmx�xm (wnn."Make er Le •kx B-1 some Special almtu ain't Win pee itself Yxr far BW G.tpl Ilte me stake maroon[,.sum Ib/v. IMm nM WYIn IfL Il.e Jmlm xoge Yxrlm xee Den=.1.1:nlDmeh L.,M. 1pM.•wxWM )A Sl �%Y f CtlPemn i S.aW apecW ded vied me famn.. Yvb W W. IU 1. ..w -m<n-•ram J ewemmre, 11,kind W Mlfl,edl.Shan COUNTY PROFILES h.I vomprmrmnn.xn.m.r Senuloo�!'II."aid Me 'im ua.yrrwen W,a,.dx Wmamwtrmn w.ae...lrodwl-pun.un.nnlawm.y.w. , xv..,.ad xe.m.W In ner Inr ant Irvine o�ua,IblWm Ma.mDMnamwde NW4D raiyuWe,xlmlevMdee,WYn elan Ptmxn6 h ran xee,Dlarml. Limn ofew"'Mmarmwnonalm Lit MildornWS epx1.I ali .nMueh ve have nw Ili I look In$11S name...t.Mau Limn[mean[Ined,,eert.W rayl.um fprmmlw lW axWltlM[u <oNon e.n awe fern,mo be;.I rani nor Heel _.a ineto lwrw nrvrte.me L1. some e.pmaimrx mall, v we inn me.. ladlvJJM,rmm W[mme Ca Lin.a .. bnam inn.' 10 `vv Ll T.ly ,mow lie ed ern. MentmuJ Ln.I-xr.We Lr Oran 1,County'. maki Mi iW emofon mYmenu m dell xp mrat pulled In Me[ranee of. p Zg1 B,mu xld. r.. k er lhmn inn "Henan ran.., .1 me num mans ter dM`k. r nMe,. Dan I e.lhec ve 00 a ext ,.it.. dln.ln al Retei"I III. Md.eea.tNNvxnlwo-enY 1.6 T m Yev' II4 million. EI •.nu land,."',he Mld. 4%1 IA .panel[: bW Than. Tim �TSm,eywl l0 IM dJImM1 • p3e 'doesn't include Deep re amid opentlry Wdeel for a0 anMe deeMi mWeY nJ,a ena mpenl an Yen' T,t"v[ui'MAI mWlm a x L..enter lim,I.aw...I u1. m dhaf men Yl ore 1p1 -Wane[ p mviaee .v rYmme min[bJ wrmem on m blind debt. rye vW from axvefW plmcrq war, Me Be...xid. 6Te ¢TW uW 1lW III■[snare liana Wote.OMe al the he,itmumieve ll Drake :weJ GUIDI Me lrvine Rx[e lortduupmunYnu,me. = 6, e'aM xaYee O., 9W: er Dam..'abler,I.a W fl Jelwn time Lam-..Wa rW,y 4p bar Mp d. eAxm p M. m mq feel R Like my.Men eMi Eat.. Ix�axraar[w.rt..r nvamq,ramrynn .xo1b IMIA.5l pnunl inert In[Ia 1..e.M. WeeM 6.n It moral W refill,W 01 me)and mane n rvry font• CHtlu u1111 Ml led mist.. "Gmemmept entltly World �patttnt Ihen 11 panl In nln) dry. Itl Mlte Dw.r. ware If in mane J Ibe,,If ma hm moot.,lux..-to of Hei woman[ fo the ul a ger of the s0ulh Cmet W. )oM•rt Wn Me all Select. Y lamaJ dLmc1.aboard nrym. a er ObWcl.Tee,led Lrpe le M paall Ian muak far we kem prtak<ven oxntlon.. Lxel eo l MY on. 11.11 wo-I to I..dwil 1.1 Make ,IllprtltYalmVlC'Wd We' TlleY Mad ln Duanmumetee u1d JMn Neeon,,mYumu lOr mtm.Dl<Dretldavn to l.e an I am PgefoL.e00aenY xtvd pent ml me uprnu a the... Ammon S4.lkr Cun Pmele, rem nd ani np.m nxdlo .e Mann[Ceunp i IS radon WYen:'he Wd, .So be be.plump In,ebWtt Wmale.omrnb to .,I.....1M WnWpICM �OG•d /G fle✓ O1LM Orange County PROFILE sd� FurtO CENTER FOR DEMOGRAPHIC OCP 1996 : Population, Employment and Housing, The Next 25 Years Orange County continues to grow despite the perception that it is approaching build-out. According to the Orange County projections 19%(OCP-96)developed by the Center for Demographic Research,over 2.6 million people currently reside in the county and by 2020,an additional 700,000 will call the county home,bringing the total to almost 3.3 million 'people. An additional 200,000 homes and 873,000 jobs will accompany this population growth. CICP-96 includes popula- tion,housing and employment projections for Orange County through the year 2020. OCP-96 represents a glance into the future of Orange County, given the current conditions,past trends and anticipated future social changes. Population Between 1995 and the year 2020,Orange County's population is expected to increase from 2.67 to 3.28 million persons. The bulk of the growth will occur by 2010, with the largest five-year increase of 200,000 occurring before the year 2000. Although this increase of approximately 609,000 is significant when compared to growth in other metropolitan areas across the United States, it does reflect an anticipated slowing of growth in Orange County. This increase is less than the 716,500 persons that were added to Orange County's population base between 1960 and 1970. Much of this tempering of growth can be attributed to Orange County's maturing w a metropolitan area. Traditionally, in-migration accounted for a majority of population increase in Orange County spurred on by new development. More recently, however, natural increase has and will account for the overall majority of Orange County's population growth. It is projected that eighty- nine percent(89%)of the county's future growth will be attributed to natural increase. Thus, overall,the high and direct onhnue on page Demographics Projected Change: 5 Year Intervals 000,000 on the Web OHousing Change oloopulation Change DEmployment Change The internet has evolved into an invaluable 254000 source for demoraphic information. The earliest pioneers on the internet were schol- ars and this tradition continues today.Data 200.000 is available from government and private sources me variety of formals. The Center for Demographic Research is currently con- 15000) - w,-.F strutting a web site focusing on Orange 'l'_ "".i County demographics as well as informa- n �- tionre regarding additional products available 8 B p tOD.DpD from the center (hftp://cdrl.fulierlon.edu). Check out some of these sites on the web: k M1ttp9hmmr.dof SD.000 ca.gov California Department of Finance home :}4, page. Wealth of information for Califor- D nia cities and counties regarding housing 11195-2000 2000.2005 r 2010 20162015 2015-2M &population demographics. Also F•Year Pariod includes links to additional sites. hip;//rysr.orgleper/slate4talifomig4egi.html California Electronic Government Profiles is produced by the Center for Demographic Research, an affiliate of the Social Science Information. Hypertext links&resource Research Center at Cal State Fullerton. Profiles focuses on demographic issues and eyen[s in Or. onttnue on page ange County. We welcome your suggestions or comments and can be reached at(714)773-3185. PAGE 1 Table 1. Housing, Population & Employment Growth: 1995-2020 Housing Population Employment JURISDICTION 1995 2020 % Growth 1995 2020 % Growth 1995 2020 % Growth Anaheim 98,110 134,095 36.7% 299,793 405,205 35.2% 184,916 355,553 92.3% Brea 12,692 16,689 31.5% 34,732 43,110 24.1% 34,107 49,365 44.7% Buena Park 23,621 26,702 13.0% 73,767 82,326 11.6% 38,158 71 ,545 87.5% Costa Mesa 40,897 44,680 9.3% 103,954 111,498 7.3% 80,170 105,245 31.3% Cypress 15,501 16,890 9.0% 46,963 50,647 7.8% 14,022 52,369 273.5% Dana Point 15,613 17,875 14.5% 36,456 41 ,779 14.6% 6,554 10,055 53.4% Fountain Valley 18,125 19,630 8.3% 55,046 59,739 8.5% 19,331 32,542 68.3% Fullerton 44,838 49,854 11 .2% 123,952 140,108 13.0% 66,060 84,004 27.2% Garden Grove 46,571 49,627 6.6% 154,007 167,484 8.8% 46,381 50,888 9.7% Huntington Beach 74,147 81 ,829 10.4% 190,978 210,053 10.0% 65,762 85,162 29.5% Irvine 47,477 58,639 23.5% 130,087 157,153 20.8% 126,578 190,552 50.5% Laguna Beach 12,804 13,102 2.3% 24,163 25,363 5.0% , 8,528 13,020 52.7% Laguna Hills 10,804 11 ,030 2.1% 31,096 29,400 -5.5% 15,619 22,350 43.1% Laguna Niguel 22,855 26,239 14.8% 56,838 64,185 12.9% 13,699 22,897 67.1% s La Habra 18,957 20,323 7.2% 54,715 59,047 7.9% 18,675 23,817 27.5% m Lake Forest 20,857 21,609 3.6% 58,761 59,296 0.9% 10,383 39,430 279.8% La Palma 4,952 5,049 2.0% 15,717 15,772 0.3% 4,967 8,447 70.1% Los Alamitos 4,438 4,590 3.4% 12,238 12,365 1.0% 12.294 13,695 11.4% Mission Viejo 30,979 33,426 7.9% 89,439 90,526 1.2% 18,327 28,858 57.5% Newport Beach 35,600 38,525 8.2% 69,749 76,495 9.7% 46,405 57,092 23.0% Orange 40,064 45,347 13.2% 121,024 136,234 12.6% 86,021 117,398 36.5% Placentia 14,474 17,659 23.4% 45,208 54,824 21 .3% 11 ,717 18,638 59.1% San Clemente 19,843 25,125 26.6% 46,746 56,895 21 .7% 7,582 20,915 175.9% San Juan Capistrano 10,191 12,824 25.8% 29,221 36,155 23.7% 7,394 11 ,244 52.1% Santa Ana 75,140 81,486 8.4% 315,972 342,382 8.4% 183,804 314,978 71 .4% Seal Beach 14,414 14,799 2.7% 26,691 27,133 1.7% 7,764 10,503 35.3% Stanton 10,941 13,868 26.8% 32,570 43,427 33.3% 7,874 12,306 56.3% Tustin 22,622 29,125 28.7% 62,592 75,561 20.7% 39,319 55,183 40.3% Villa Park 2,025 2,069 2.2% 6,505 6,646 2.2% 547 617 12.8% Westminster 26,104 32,683 25.2% 82,929 103,472 24.8% 22,127 35,672 61.2% Yorba Linda 18,847 23,013 22.1% 58,659 69,246 18.0% 11 ,477 13,550 18.1% Unincorporated 72,317 175,970 143.3% 179,662 424,829 136.5% 24,358 186,385 665.2% Orange County 926,800 1,164,600 25.7% 2.670,200 3,278,400 22.8% 1,240,900 2.114,300 70.4% Source: Center for Demographic Research, CSU Fullerton F _ i .f Continued from page I County. Over 100,000 dwelling units MCAS Reuse Plan includes develop- - correlation between land development will be added to current unincorpo- ment of 3,000 dwelling units. While and Orange County's population rated areas of Orange County be- no plans have been approved yet, growth is weakening, although future tween 1995 and 2020. Continued each El Toro MCAS alternative has a development will still be a significant development of existing projects such residential component. As we move part of the growth equation. as Aliso Viejo,Rancho Santa into the twenty-first century,redevel- Most of Orange County's Margarita,Rancho Trabuco, Irvine opment will also play a growing role future population growth will occur Coast, Peters Canyon,East Orange, as vast amounts of Orange County's in the current unincorporated For- and Los Flores along with future existing housing stock reaches fifty to tions of the county,accounting for projects such as Ladera, and other sixty years of age. nearly forty percent of the growth. A undeveloped portions of Rancho significant portion of this growth is in Mission Viejo are all expected to Emplovment city sphere of influences,such as Brea, contribute to future housing growth Following the dramatic restructuring Huntington Beach, Irvine, and Or- in the unincorporated area. Often of the Orange County economy in the ange. Thus,the growth is antici- overlooked early 1990s,employment is expected Fated to occur after the unincorpo- - are the to rise by almost 853,000 jobs(70%) by rated land is annexed into the 'i„ the year 2020. Growth during the respective cities. Of the current early years of the projections are ' incorporated cities, Anaheim expected to be moderate with a is expected to experience the projected annual increase of approxi- largest increase with a gain " mately two percent(2.0%). This rate of 105,00 persons or a of growth is more consistent with thirty-five percent expected state and national rates (33%) increase, °� � of growth than was the case in vaulting it to the - the past when Orange county's largest city ,: County typically ex- again. The current - ceeded these rates. largest city,Santa Ana, Employment is will grow by only 26,410 expected to or 8.4%. Twenty-two of jump to an the remaining incorporated f..` M,. , . annual cities, distributed throughout (- .��. growth rate the county,are expected roz.. of 2.8% be- experience moderate growth. tween 2015 and These range from La Habra at the 2020 as a result of most northerly major projects tip of the Population Growth 1995-2020 coming on line,such as county, which Net Loss ® 500 to 1500 the reuse of El Toro will add 4,300 " MCAS. persons,to San [i 0 to 250 Over 1500 Of the total county Clemente at the increase, approximately most southerly Eu 251 to 500 769,000 jobs will be wage tip which will Data shown by Census Tract and salary jobs and the remaining add approxi- 83,000 jobs will be self-employ- mately 10,000 persons. The popula- large parcels of land in north- ment. Much of the employment tion in six cities is expected to remain ern Orange County that are growth is primarily expected in the virtually unchanged. These cities are transitioning out of oil production and service sector,accounting for nearly Lake Forest,La Palma,Los Alamitos, other uses and into residential devel- 376,000 additional jobs. Wholesale Mission Viejo,Seal Beach,and Villa opment such as Coyote Hills in and retail trade are also expected to Park. The city of Laguna Hills is Fullerton,and the Boise Chica area show significant increases at 57,000 projected to have a net loss in popula- adjacent to Huntington Beach. The and 153,000 job increases respec- tion of approximately 1,700 persons or cities of Anaheim, Brea,Fullerton, tively. Increases are also expected in a decline of 5.55. Huntington Beach,Irvine,Orange, construction, finance, insurance, real Placentia,San Clemente,Tustin,and estate,and state and local govem- Housin¢gUnits Yorba Linda all have large parcels of ment. Both non-durable goods and Paralleling population,most of the undeveloped land which will develop durable goods manufacturing are housing unit growth is expected to over the next several years. Military expected to decline initially, but will occur in the currently undeveloped base conversion will also play an eventually begin to show some and mostly unincorporated portions important role in the continued increases. Agriculture, mining,and of southern and eastern Orange growth of Orange County. Tustin federal government employment will PAGE 3 Continued from page 3 Table 2. ahl show declines. EMPLOYMENT GROWTH BY SECTOR Most of this pro- Sectors 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 jetted employment growth Agricultural 8,210 7,323 7,052 6,770 6,819 7,205 will occur in the existing Mining 977 839 780 698 677 675 and currently planned Construction 46,524 56,562 64,493 73,559 81,840 95.499 employment centers. Each Mfg: Non Durable 68,418 68,449 70,777 72,397 76,438 84,223 jurisdiction in Orange Mfg: Durable 131,948 122,164 121.970 120,472 124,315 133,967 County is expected to Transportation/Utifi ies 39,780 40.309 42,587 44.572 47,685 53.253 experience some employ- Wholesale Trade 80,244 87,495 98,120 108,198 119,508 137,224 ment growth. Anaheim, Retail 198,216 223,593 248,364 276.783 3D4,244 351.165 Irvine,Saner Ana,and the Finance 35.773 38,791 44,427 50,194 55,996 65,055 unincorporated areas are Insurance/Other 52,193 56,491 64,274 72.749 80,888 94,054 however,expected to ex Services 328.893 394,335 459,731 532,472 598,282 702,934 experience high levels of growth ranging from 64,000 Federal Government 14.661 14,002 13,696 13,062 13,242 13,924 added jobs for Irvine to Slate 8 Local Gov 109,664 122,046 129,828 137,873 148,167 166,821 162,000 added jobs for the Wage B Salary 1,115,501 1,232.399 1.366.099 1,509,799 1,658,101 1,905,999 unincorporated areas. Self-Employment 125,400 146,600 165,100 182,000 195,200 208,300 Demographic Sites- Total Employment 1,240,901 1,378,999 1,531,199 1,691,799 1,853,301 2,114,299 Continued from page 1 Source:Cenler for Demographic Research, &CA Employment Development Department descriptions for over 230 Califomia state,regional k murucipal databases.Links to other ,, compilations. OCP Assumption$ - All phases of the three transporla- http,11uavm.rensuxgw/cgi-bin/gamttre tion corridors will be complete US.Gazattear.This gazetteer is used to In order to develop projections of future prior to 2020. identify places m view with the Tiger Map trends in housing stock, social structure • While there may be recurring Server and obtain census dam from the and employment dynamics, many recessions, there will be no pro- 1990 Census Lookup server. The entire assmaptions mutt be made regarding longed national or regional depres- uwm.cemusgoa site is massive. Orange County. Over 100 conditional sions. httpJyWN4V SCAG.ORC1 events were incorporated into the While there will be moderate job Souther California Association of projections, and a few key assumptions growth in Orange County's produc- Governments(SLAG)Access ProjecL are as follows: tion sectors, most of the projected Chu can also use om Web pages to growth in jobs will be in the service obtain information about member . The final portions of available land industries. agencim in the county will achieve first a The proportion of sell and home- Commerdel Sources: generation build-out sometime after based employment to total employ- hftpV1u .mmkennghx1s cvuV 2020. meet will increase throughout the Amenom Demographics and Marketing a The countywide rate of residential period of these projections. Tools are Dow Jones publications for redevelopment from single family to a There will be a continued market of businesses looking to find,reach and keep uomers. multiple family units will increase home-buyers of an appropriate throughout the period of these range to sustain demand for housing hetp,.11 a.ari.com/besq*WA'nder.htod projections as the existing homing in Orange County. A wealth of AmInfe CIS data.Tour ESRI's stock ages and deteriorates. • Los Alamitos Armed Forces extensive collection of data resources to . Significant commercial and indm- Reserve Center and Seal Beach discover everything from free dam sets to trial development will occur along Naval Weapons Station will remain SPOT satellite images. major transportation ancries N government ownership and use. http//unurv.rlm•ftas.mm/ throughout the period of these a El Tom MCAS and Tustin MCAS Clarifad Precision Marketing.An integra- projections. will both be closed by mid-1999. tion of demographics,specialized dam, The fertility rate will decline over Reuse of the EI Toro MCAS facility customer dam,geography,mapping and marketing the projection period and will reach will emphasize employment mid-1980 levels by 2020. development and reuse of the Tustin help://u wu.mopinfo.mm1 . Net migration into Orange County MCAS facility will include both Mapinfo presents MapXpress-the online will continue to remain high during residential and employment devel- CISstore,where you can buy dam and the first years of these projections opmenL more This comprehensive online catalog and gradually decline out to the year lists hundreds of different dam types for 2020. use with Maputo. PAGE 4l,Y a November 12, 1996 m MEMORANDUM TO: Director John Collins Joint Chair FROM: Nancy J. Wheatley Director of Technical Services SUBJECT: Funding for Boise Chica State Beach Repairs Following is a copy of the determination from the Department of Finance that the Bolsa Chica sewer system repair should be funded as a deficiency authorization. The finding allows the system to be replaced at the present level of service, which involves the replacement of the pipe in kind. While that may not be the best action, at least the system will be fixed. My reading of this determination is that no further action is required by the legislature, and authorization to proceed will be provided to the Parks Department in 30 days. NJW:ahh 3510NancylmemoaWslajc.lnlno Enclosure c: D. McIntyre B. Anderson CSDOC 0 P.O.Box 6127 0 Fountain Valley.CA 92726-e131 0 (714)962-2411 I1-08-199 3:d0PM FROM ORANGE COAST NO. SEC 714 8A17830 P. 2 Fig1 :QFIIN{$IpGT{l.E se VXCIES sit 66.1 %GY 199G.11-eb is:16 4132 P,pZilba DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF CFTNEmwEnroe / 57A}ECAJ Raon IIN SMFAME CA 9ratulWe - November6, 1996 Honorable Alfred E-Alquist,Chaitpnr on Honorable Gary G.Miller.Chairperson Joint legislative Budget Committee Assembly Budget Committee Honorable Mike Thompson,Chairperson Honorable Charles Poochigian, Chairperson Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee Assembly Appropriations Commince Honorable Patrick Johnston,Chairperson Senate Appropriations Committee -- TRANSMITTAL Of DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POSl'1'ION ON DEFICIENCY AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED BY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Pursuant to the provisions of Section 27.00 of the Budget Act of 1996,we are submitting the following infmmatiom. We have reviewed the attached request submitted by the Department of Parks and Recreation(DPR)for a deficiency authorization of f 1,065,000 (General Fund). This request would provide funding to replace the main sewer pipeline at Bolen China Stare Beach The replacement of the main sewer pipeline would permanently repair the current system and would not improve nor enhance the current level of service now provided by the sewer system. As such,this would be considered an appropriate state operations cost Bola Chita State Beach is a popular day use part located in Orange County offering 22 miles of lifeguarded ocean ¢each front. During 1995-96, Rolm Chita State Beach ' attracted a total of 885,186 vispors, including 600,000 during the summer months and generated apprardmmely EL ton in revenues. On May 20, 1996,DPR was iaf meC by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County that the county had performed an oqensive investigation of the cause behind intermittent, elevated bacterial counts in the opearl waters ditccdy off Rolm Chita State Beach A video tape inspection of the sewer pipeline revealed that throughout the length of'the ?7 mere pipeline there was a total of 47 locations where the pipe had offset joins. Cracks and root intrusions wbich allowed small=on=of liquid raw sewage to seep from the pipeline into groundwater and eventually-into the oceen. As a result of the county's fildings, DPR was notified to take immediate action to eliminate this discharge of raw scwage into the ocean waters and submit a short-and long-term proposal. Immediate steps were taken to chlorinate the system but continued mtermittem,elevated bacterial court persisted I Oa Jame 16, 1996,doe to a possble risk to public health and to prevent the spend of disease. - the Orange County Health Care Agency ordered closure of two-thirds of the Bolm Chita State Beach until DPR could prot'ide an interim solution, DPR provided an interim proposal that included the use of chemical t'oile:s ar some locations and pumping of wet wells ar other locations;thus dimicad g any w%-22C!1A0 the main pipeline which lead to the reopening of the closed beach area on hue 29, 19%. To dare, Bolm Chita State Beach continua 10 operate under the interim propomL r II-ON-19.f 3.a IPM FROM ORANGF COAST NO SEC 714 8417630 I P 3 c.U, :tyW IN[S�TI�E 6ER,/1(£5 9l6 653 3a-1E 199G.33-W 3517 03a2 P.0Y0'3 . DPR's long-term proposal is to replace the main sewer pipeline. Because of the potential risk to public health, the Department is requesting funding to replace the existing sewer pipeline that would continue the usability at its mmeat designed level of se lice and to repair and replace existing wiring and pumps. in addition. funding is requested for chemical toilets, for public ore, during the conmuction period The completion of this project is critical in order to resolve a potential public health risk in the most efficient, timely and over the long run, less costly manor, avoid potential closure of the park unit with the attendant revenue - loss, and allow Bolsa Chica Stare Beach to operate safely for the recreating public. The department's current year deferred maintenance allocation is S2-9 million. There are 95 deferred ma sterance projects planned in the current year ranging from_$3,500_to_.. .__ .-..- - $200,000. Redirection of these hinds would use nearly 37 percem of the deferred maimenance allocation and would prevent funding of other high priority, health and safety projects. These projects include: sewer repairs, roof and stttulwe repairs, waterline . replaeemeats, septic system replacements, and electric fmc reptar..naffs , Not proceeding with these projects could result in ereatiag public health risk concerns at other state park facilities, mare costly repairs in the long terra, and potential loss of revenues because of degraded or unsafe 56 ities. Furthermore, the districts are formally wed of the¢ approved deferred maimera9nce projects and allocations at the star of the fiscal year, thus. . I many of these projects are already completed or are in process. We concur with the request and will send written approval to the Department no soon=tban 30 days from the elate of this letter. 1 Please call Carol Baker, Principal Pro-grata Budget Analyst, at 324-0043 if you have my questions. _ CRAIGL.BROWN Director of Finance By: ORIGINAL SIGNED BY UFtnus Stancell LaFBNUS STANCEU Chief Deputy Director Attachment cc: On naa page. 11-08-1996 3:42PM FROM ORANGE COAST NO SEC 71A 8A 17930 v et r Fitp1 !! J.IS1=r1V6 5a IMS 916 6S Sti'IB 19%•:1-� IS;II QSi2 P.Oo/0f 3 cc Honorable Cathie Wright,Vice Chairperson, Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee Honorable Denise Moreno Duchy,Ytce Chairperson,Assembly Budget Committee Honorable Quentin L Kopp,Champerson,Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Suboommiaallo-2 Honorable Howard:K�aloogiac,Chairperson Assembly Budget Subcommittee No.3 Ms.Elbmbeth a 01 Legislative Analyst(3) Mr.Douglas WhcFlw,Secretary,Resources Agency Mr.Donald W.Nfurpity,Director,Departmem of Parks and Recreation NU.Thomas Domich,Deputy Director-Admunstrarimt,Department of Parks and Rccreatioa ..__. . ---- ✓Ms.Becky Brown,Budget Officer,Department of Parks and Recreation Mr.Steve Larson, Staff Director,Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee . Ms.Kate=Frens h Staff Director.Senate Appropriations Committee Mr.Curt muter,StaffDireotor,Senate Minority Fiscai Office Ms Shannon Hood,Chief Consultant,Assembly Appropriations Committed Mr. 7ohn Latimer,Chief of Stet$Assembly Democratic Appropriations aefOeaceS ENS MEMORANDUM Pog4te Fee Nola 7.871 Om e► m ran cprerot eeij TO Blake Anderson prom. p pnp� FROM: Eric SaprstemX`--_ —a Fg,. DAZE November 6, 1996 i SUBJECT: Grneral Elation Results: Divided Government Maintains Stews with Jdmt of Moderating Influence on Environmental Policy 1 I The election returns are in and as the pundits ptalicled,the most expensive campaign season insulted in incremental changes overall with House Democrats picking up ten scats and Serrate Republicans obtaining a net gam of two seats. Oudook for 1051"Congress One:Congress convenes,action on unfinished business fiom the 104"Congress will begin in earnest. At Us stage it is too early to make definitive statements on how the new Congress will proceed. However,it is clear that compromise will be the order ofthe day. Failure to acbieve this may result in unparalleled gridlock, pattiadarly in the House,as working majorities appear to be elusive without such conciliatory efforts because of the new voting ratios. Once Congre55 converim the fast order of bustness will be the development of fiscal year 1995 budget. Pressure to meet the 2002 balanced budget deadline will cartinue to dominate spending decisions. This and the line item veto may play significantly into how the budget is developed. Aside fiom the budget, congressional staff indicate that dean water and SuperfuM am the tap environmental priorities for the coming year. In addition,the effortto renew the Endangered Species Ant is once again likely to be considered given the substantial efforts made over the past two years. Summary oJE7acoon Rau= As of today,without regard to a small number of congressional seats too close to call,the House of Representatives will remain in Republican control 227-207 with one Independent who usually votes with the Democrats. This ratio of nine votes is already razor thin but could be further eroded with three Texas congressional seats subject to mmoM in December. Nonetheless,most congressional observers believe the House Republican majority will settle near nine seats. The Senate will also remain in Republican control by 5545,although the Oregon Senate seat has riot been declared. ENS Rnources, Inc. 1130 Co.,W"t A•oaw, N.W./ Seile 300 WNhingrnn, O.C. 20O30/ Telephone (202)4663755 Teleran (202)466-3187 Both the House and Senate are scheduled to expedhe congressional organization activities. The House Republicans will hold Icadership,and enmmidee chairmanship elections November 20-22. Republican committee assignments will be made during the same poniod. House Democrats will hold their leadership elections on November 18-22 with committee assignments made between November 19-22. 'the Senate leadership elections are tentatively scheduled for December 3. The 1051 Congress convenes January 7, 1997. Crmgrrnional Leadership Unrlr 4 to Change Because the Republicans retained control over Congress,the leadership is expected to remain largely mrhmnged. While last minute challenges could be ovule,it now appears lilrelythat Speaker Gmench(R-GA),Majority Leader Array(R-T)n and Majority Whip Delay(F TX) Will continue in their mles Similarly,Minority Leader Gephardt(D-MO)and Minority Whip Houck(D-MI)will continue in 0reir leadership positions. Committee chairmanships and ranking Democrat positions are also expected to remain largely unchanged However,on the issue ofemnicar atal policy,modemte Republicans,lad by Boddert(R-NY),who sits as Chairman ofthe Subcommittee un Water Resour eca,me expected to exert new and stronger influence on environmental legislation. This enhanced rule should work to avoid the protracted and contentious debate that typified the split on environmental policies ofthe poet two years, Cahfonzia House CongressiondDeftalion is have Democratic Majority The number of changes in the House is minimal,but significant modifications to the commitice rosters will occur as part ofthe normal organization process. to addition,dmc defeat Of California Rxpresentatives Baker,Seasnand,and the still masand'urg results ofotber seats means that the Democratic California Members secured a majority within the delegation by at least two seats. The number of retirements along with defeats means that Members may elect to serve on other commit[oes than currently assigned. For example,the House Committee on Transportation and Inftnstructure with jurisdiction ova clean water,Superfund,and general infrastructure policies will have at least ten vacancies Two ofthese occur became of the defxat of California committee Members,decreasing California's repmsantetion Gem sue to fan members. On the Resources Committee with jurisdiction over natural resources policy including water reclamation,a minimum of six vacancies occur. No California vamneicv were created by the election. The Commerce Committee with primary jurisdiction over Superfond and Safe Drinking Water policies also has five vacancies to be filled but with no Californian seats being IosL 9 Pa0e 2 In the Appropriations Committee at Icast five vacancies have occurred making appointments to this important commithx potentially available to California Members. Smarr Com-Mee L me-Up UN(kely to Change The consequences for the Senate are Im clear. The Republican majority has increased by two votes,but the mom important outcome appear:to be that the ideological center has become sm Um as more Members are found to reside to the right of center. Therc are no vacancies created by the election or by retirements on the Senate Environment Committee where moderme Chairman Iuhn(ludee(R-RI)is anticipated to maintain an effort to limit dramatic uverhauls of laws,like clean water and the Endangered Species Act He believes that these laws only rogrme time tuning. Ifthe Senate committee approves legislation that is only foe tuning adsthrg law,it appears highly probable that significant Senate floor debate,where tho Senate as a whole scems to have become more conservative,will take place reshaping legislatimn along mom conservative Imes. In other Senate committees changes affecting environmental policy and spending priorities are expected to be equally subtle with little change in the committees'rosters occurring as a result of the elootum Mention Resahs Crewe NmAtmasphem for Environmental polity Issues The election returns will have a direct effort on the approach Congress takes to=owing such key laws as the Clean Water Act and Superfuad which failed to be reauthorized during the 104TM Congress. Since only two Senate seats changed party,the composition of the committees with jurisdiction over enviromnental policy is unlikely to change the emphasis on fine timing environmental laws. Additionally,the direction ofany reauthorization,like the House-passed clean water bill,H.R. 961.is unlikely to be the comae of action next year. In fact,the muming alter analysis of the election indicates that environmental Republican moderates will have significant leverage in the development of legisladnm given the slim majority the Republicans now hold in the House where major overhauls ofemvonnueatal mandates created a major political backlash The desire to repeat this situation should create an atmosphere drat will develop legislation that avoids pohri, on ofthe awbonmcntal policy debates in the House. 0 Page 3 1 "Protecting the Public Health and Environment Through Excellence in Wastewater Systems" • • • • • • ThePIPELINENPOCAnI EDITION News . . . . . . . . Special Edition No. 8 November 7, 1996 Director of Finance An Interview with ;~�� Gary Streed Tenure-wise, Gary Streed is the senior member of the r Executive Management Team, having celebrated his 29th anniversary with the Districts in September. Over the years, he's seen numerous changes at the agency, including a fourfold �� increase in the number of employees, from 150 in 1967 to about 600 in 1996. ' Gary refers to himself as a "Southern California product," having graduated from Santa Fe High School in Santa Fe Springs and from UCLA, where he earned a bachelor's degree in accounting. Gary and his wife Pat have two children,Jeff, 17,and Becky, 14,both of whom attend Laguna Hills High School. Waterskiing is the Streed's family hobby. And, as some employees already know, Gary is an avid surfer and mountain biker. QWhat happened to raises? The new pran ^ In the past there have been abuses does not address steps, or if a raise is due. associated with time cards. For example, If you are promoted, does your review date and a vacation would be taken but not reported on raise change to six months after the promotion? the actual time card. Currently, there does not AThere are two separate compensation systems; appear to be checks and balances about what one for exempt and one for nonexempt employees. is reported on a time card. Yes, it is the In general, exempt employees don't receive step supervisors' responsibility to ensure that what increases, but are reviewed annually on performance. is contained in the card is true and correct. Salaries are adjusted in July based on those reviews. However, are they provided with the tools to help them do their job? Shouldn'tthere be a Nonexempt employees continue to be on the ft've-step Districts-wide "Request for time off/Report of program with annual performance reviews and potential time off' used by everyone that would provide salary increases as determined by their MOM. a method for requesting time off and reporting If a person is promoted,his or her review date only absences such as sick leave? The employee changes if that employee is going from nonexempt to gets the original and the supervisor and payroll exempt status. All exempt employees have the same receive copies. Then there is a match between review date, which is July 1. Review dates for what time off has been approved and what is nonexempt employees are determined by their hire dates. actually contained on the payroll card. Every Raises for promoted employees are immediate and absence from work must be reported on this are not withheld pending satisfactory completion of a form. I've noticed a lack of good supervision in promotion probationary period, this area, but, to be fair, I don't think the tools ff you need more information, I'm certain Human are in place to assist them properly. Resources can answer your specific questions. If I understand the question correctly, this employee A is alleging that people are faking time off without reporting it. This is a serious allegation and f certainly t (tope that it is not true. I believe the ultimate do not equate to extra quality. Extra hours may, responsibility for correctly completing a time card rests however,be an indication of dedication or commitment with each individual employee. After that,the supervisor to a project or process. has the responsibility for ensuring that time cards are As far as the Accounting staff is concerned,they correct for(tours worked and work order charged. only input the hours worked and paid for, not the extra That's why supervisors must countersign all the time uncompensated lours. So, there's really no additional cards for their direct-report employees. work for the Accounting staff. Forms for requesting vacation or personal time off are already in place,and supervisors must sign this form I understand that "Executive-level to indicate their approval before the time is taken. 10Management Staff" receive "compensation" If supervisors maintain a calendarfor their employees' (twicea year) for the purchase of publications, vacation requests,personal holidays and sick days, there subscriptions, etc. When our department should be no problem double checking the information purchases such items, we complete a Purchase on the time cards. In addition,supervisors are provided Requisition for payment. Therefore, my with accrued leave balances and uses for their staff every questions are... two weeks. This report is beneficial in identifying any discrepancies. As you may know,we are in the early What actually is the purpose of this stages of implementing a new Financial Information "compensation" they receive and what is it to be System(FIS). AportionoftheworkwdlbetoeaduateaUof used for? our paperflowpmresses,andyour%Wgestionwil(becon5dered 2. If this "compensation" is to be used to In the metnitme,ifsommne knows about abuses,Iurge them to purchase publications, subscriptions, etc., does amfact their Department Head or me. Purchasing and/or Accounting monitor spending/usage and if a Department never QIt is my understanding that for years purchases these items, does the "Management division managers, department heads, Staff" continue to receive this "compensation". and perhaps others who are salaried employees 3. Where in the "Summary of Expenses by have submitted their time cards indicating the Line Item Report" is this "compensation" shown? actual number of hours they worked or were Salaries and Wages? at work. This appears to be a practice that /r► The "compensation"you're referring to is called na has carried over from the previous magement! A the Benefit Option Plan,or BOP. In addition to general manager (I'm not certain). What is the executive management, BOP monies are distributed to point of this? Sometimes an exempt employee professional,supervisory and management employees will have to put in some extra time. This is part and may be used in accordance with each group's MOU. of being exempt. But it certainly does not prove BOP funds may be used to offset insurance premiums, that an employee is putting in quality work time for additional training, subscriptions and professional just because extra hours are indicated on the journals,professional memberships, licenses or time sheet; it may even indicate a lack of focus certifications. Unused funds may be deposited to the or directed work during regular business hours. employee's Deferred Compensation Account subject to Isn't this a practice that just adds work for your legal limits. accounting people but really isn't a useful tool in Neither Purchasing nor Accounting monitors evaluating exempt employees? spending or usage of BOP money. Individual staff AAs you mentioned, most exempt employees work members must use these funds in accordance with the beyond their regularly scheduled work week plan. Use of these funds must be designated by the without additional compensation. However,to properly employee at the start of each year. determine the real costs for special projects, it may be You're correct in knowing that compensation is listed necessary or desirable to record all of the hours worked under salaries and urges in the Summary of Expenses for those employees working on the special projects. by Line Item Report,also known as the Joint Operating Some supervisors and managers are interested in the Fund Budget Review. If you or other employees have total number of hours worked for their exempt employees further questions about human resources policies and to better evaluate performance or determine whether procedures,you may want to stop by the HR office for a there's a need to reallocate work responsibilities. copy of the October 1995 "Red Book." Of course,you're right when you state that extra hours 2 On the "Summary of Expenses by Line Item .,of oil;ratepayers and to assure that proper policies and Report" what is the line item titled "General procedures are followed. While 1 know it's not always Manager Contingency" with a budget amount of possible, it helps if you give us plenty of lead time when $270,000.00 listed under Department 2150 used you have a request. I would appreciate hearing your for? Thank you for your clarification. speck suggestions far improving communications. AIn the budget development process,each division Please call me any time on ext. 2500. submitted budget requests for the upcoming fiscal Many of you may not know,but in the Districts' year. When all of these requests were summed to phone book there is a list of who to call in Accounting determine the Districts' total operating budget, (Page 36)and Purchasing/Warehouse (page 38 and 39). management reduced the budget by 2%or$540,000. I've also spoken with Communications to have another To ease the pain,one-half of that amount,or$270,000, list published in a future edition of Pipeline. was put back into the budget and set aside as the General Agreat deal of time and effort goes into developing Manager's Contingency fund. If, toward the end of this a budget,and I appreciate employees asking questions fiscal year,a division finds that it budgeted too closely about it. CORF stands for Capital Outlay Revolving or an unexpected need arose, the Department Head can Fund, which is tire process we use to account for request additional funds. The request is made directly improvements at fire plants paid for the Districts. to the General Manager with the approval of the This year we implemented a budget coordinator process. appropriate Assistant General Manager. The$270,000 Each division was represented in budget training and in the contingency fund is not intended to be spent by development. We hope to expand this opportunity in the General Manager, but to be used by any division, the future. subsequent to the General Manager's approval, as needed for expenditures not reasonably foreseeable during the Attached to this special-edition Pipeline is a copy budget process. of the Budget Executive Summary. I hope you find it helpfu[in answering your questions. If you have more detailed questions,you may be able to get answers from Trying to get information from accounting your supervisor or manager. If not,please call Brad and purchasing is like pulling teeth. Cagle at ext. 2525. One of our goals is to provide better, The first word that comes to mind when I think more timely information in a more understandable of those divisions is "mystery." What are you forma with the new FIS. doing to improve communication to staff outside your department (I have a couple of suggestions)? Could you provide all employees When we call the purchasing division, with a periodic listing of what job functions your some of your staff make us feel like they Accounting staff perform along with paper- are doing us a favor by answering our questions process flow information? This would really when in actuality all they are doing is performing help in knowing who to go to when you need the job they are being paid to do. What are you to contact that division. Could you provide doing about improving this? all employees with a data sheet explaining A Customer service and courtesy are very important, how the budget is split up and how it works? and we want to know when you,our customers, For example, what is CORF? Not all employees are unhappy. It would help tremendously if you called are accountants and understand the system. or wrote Marc Dubois or me if you experience a problem. AAccording to the recent Finance Department Please remember, thought, that an important fimction Customer Survey,53% of the 126 employees of both the Purchasing and Warehouse staff is to be sure who responded said that they strongly agree or agree policies and procedures are followed. 1 think there is that the Finance Department staff is doing a good job. always a natural tension between those who are trying Another 18% somewhat agree. Afew employees did to do something and those who must enforce the rules. express concerns similar to yours and they are being Staff doesn't have all of the process or facility knowledge addressed. The Accounting and Purchasing staff are that you do,but they will always go the extra distance primarily customer service divisions,serving nearly when they understand your need. If you have an idea 600 employees and 2.1 million citizens. Sometimes for improving practices,please call me. our two major customers seem to have different wants If you're in a division that relies on input from and needs. Our highest priority is to protect the assets others to perform your job,you knoto how frustrating it is when you receive incomplete or wrong information. 3 This happens frequently to the Purchasing and Is there anything you'd like to say Warehouse staff. They receive forms that are not Q to employees? completed in full or the wrong form was submitted. /� This past summer 1 was fortunate to be able to take To!yelp ensure that you get good service,please plan A a two-week canoe trip into the Boundary Waters ahead, use the right forms and fill them out completely. between Canada and Minnesota with my son and some other Boy Scouts. One of the things that struck me was QGetting a work order under our current how much the trip was like work,and not just because system is horrible. Unless you are aware it was work! Let me explain. of projects and who is doing what, you don't Many of you may have some canoe experience and know what work order to use. Every time we you know that a canoe is pretty stable until you put need a work order it's a guessing game -- people in it. Then keeping it right side up becomes an who do we contact first. When we do call your issue. With some basic training most anyone can keep department for information, we are given the a canoe from tipping in calm water. When the wind run-around, then we are told to call the project kicks up or waves are large or rapids must be negotiated, manager or look at our work order listing book more skill, experience and effort are needed. (then you better hope that someone in your We used two-person canoes on our trip. This means department has updated this book with the that two people must work together to make any periodic listings we get or heaven help you). Progress. If one person is too strong or too weak,the This process needs to be looked at from canoe just goes in circles. The strong can compensate for from someone who understands streamlining the weak paddler for a while, but a much better solution this process in the near and consistency. Is future?your plan to revamp is for the more experienced paddler to teach the novice how to improve so that both are strong and paddling is AIt is my understanding that division supervisors balanced. have a list of all the job cost work orders. Updated pages and copies of jab plans are issued as necessary. In a two-person canoe,one person is responsible for If you would like to be added to the distribution list, steering while the other is mainly a means of propulsion. please call Bill Aldridge on ext. 2552. This can lead the steerer into the false sense that only he We vn11 be modifyingand simplifyingthis list need know where they are heading. 1 found that even when my job was to propel,I could still steer,but not during the installation of our Financial Information very well. Mostly what 1 did was to make the work of System. Infect,a flexible work order system was one the steerer even more difficult. However,when both of us of our criteria for selecting an FIS. One of our first tasks knew exactly where we were heading, we could both will be to refine the current numbering system. But, no adjust or synchronize our effort to be sure we reached the system is any good if it is not properly used. I believe destination. that anyone assigning work is responsible to know the proper charge instructions. If a person has a question Perhaps some of you will see some similarities about a number, Bill is my staff person to call. between this anecdote and some of the things that are happening at the Districts. 1 think you will agree that By the way, this is not the only process that can all of us have been going through some rough water or benefit from a comprehensive review by someone who rapids and that some of us were not really prepared. understands streamlining and consistency. I'm glad to To make it to the goal we must continue our training be able to tell you we've already started this effort. efforts so that each of us is as strong and useful as possible. We cannot rely on only a few,everyone must QA few weeks ago you provided us with the contribute fully,everyone must know where we are opportunity to complete a survey regarding headed and everyone must know why we an headed your department. Thank youl Are you planning there. 1 think we are well on the way. If we keep up on having a follow-up survey down the road? tire good work,we'll have a good trip! AFirst of all,you're welcome. And, thank you for Thank you, Gary! taking the time to complete the survey. We really ++•••»+•++»•+••••+•••++•»••+••+•+•+•+•«_.•««»« appreciate the 20% of you who took the time to fill it out. Because of the worfrplace investigation just ended,General I hope the remaining 80%are equally or more satisfied Manager Don McIntyre will be the ne)d member of executive with our efforts. Yes,toe do intend to repeat the survey staff to be Interviewed. Please send your questions for Don annually, if not semiannually. The results of our first to the Communications Department by Nov 15. We will survey will be published in the November Pipeline. resume interviews with Department Heads in December. 4 W 11a' 4W 4W The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County budget for fiscal Performance Measures Management Performance Review Program 1996-97 reflects our continuing efforts to build a performance-based organization while,at the same time,reducing operating costs and In the past.we have compared ourselves with other publicly run The last component of our performance-based organization.the increasing overall efficiencies. wastewater facilities and the results have always been favorable. But in Management Performance Review Plan(MPRP1,was implemented with For example,we incorporated some maintenance functions into the early 1996,we compared our operations to private-sector wastewater the new fiscal year.The plan recognizes and rewards individual effort and Operations Department to increase work force flexibility, We decreased treatment facilities of similar size,and the results were not as reassuring. gives employees primary responsibility for their personal performance and authorized staffing levels and made reductions in contractual services and development It also emphasizes the responsibility supervisors and supplies to hold costs is prior year levels. And,reinforcing our belief that We learned that our staffing levels are slightly high,that we need to managers have for supporting employees'efforts. employees are the single most important contributors the success of improve work force flexibility through cross training and that our plant our wastewater treatment operation,we established new compensation automation efforts need to be accelerated. All of these areas have been Staffing and Training program that encourages end rewards individual efforts. targeted for fiscal 1997 and are part of our overall competitiveness efforts, As we noted earlier,we will hold our maximum number of authorized The impact of some of these measures will be immediate. The affect of positions in fiscal 1997 to 624,a move that will contribute to our overall others will take longer to realize. All of these activities reflect a panod of Organizational Changes competitiveness efforts as t more closely matches the staffing levels of change for the Districts Be we strive to become more competitive in an privately held or operated wastewater treatment agencies. en increasingly competitive environment We implemented several melon General Services changes for fiscal 1997, Department, including establishing a new General 6ervicos Administration Department, While staffing decreases through naWral attrition will occur over the next streamlining the Human Resources Department and incorporating some several years,we will also be working more efficiently as a result of plant Budget Overview maintenance functions into Operations. automation and such additions as a financial information system. Training Our two treatment plants,located in Fountain Valley and Huntington and cross training=if also help in this effort,and approximately 2%of Beach,process about 240 million gallons of wastewater each day General Services Administration (GSA) Department total salaries has been earmarked fortraining for fiscal 1997. generated by 2.2 million people in central and northwest Orange County. For fiscal 1996-97.we have budgeted$48.7 million to operate,maintain This new department consolidates all of the functions that Critical Goals and manage our sewage treatment and disposal system. This is the same indirectly support our wastewater treatment activities,including We identified seven critical goals for fiscal 1997. These goals form the as our projected expenses for 1995-96. the Auto Shop,Paint Shop,Rebuild Shop and the Collections framework of our efforts over the next 12 months and identity areas and Division,which maintains the sewer trunk lines and pump activities which we feel are essential for our continued success. They are: The cost per million gallons of wastewater treated, r industrywide stations in the individual Districts. Technology also incorporates two e1' performance measurement,will also be the some far fiscal 1997 at$556. restructured divisions,the p Information Technology and Plant ■Ensure that the Districts are competitive by improving Automation,and the proposed Compressed NeWrel Gas Section productivity through proactive manpower planning and the Our Capital Outlay Revolving Fund(CORF)budget for fiscal year 1996-97 And,GSA is responsible for managing plant security. application of technology. is$44.9 million. Funded by the nine districts comprising the County ■Increase the efficiency and effectiveness of compliance with Sanitation Districts of Orange County,the CORF budget finances ongoing Human Resources Department regulatory requirements for NPDES and other permits by improving and proposed joint works treatment and disposal system improvement monitoring and analytical activities to better understand and projects. An Education and Training Division has been established in the explain impacts of Disbrcts'operations Human Resources Department to ensure consistency of our ■Develop strategic plan which meets the future needs of the There is one notable decrease for fiscal 1997. We have eliminated 54 training and cross training efforts. And,by reorganizing other P a 9 P vacant positions from 1996 authorized levels. While we were authorized functions within Human Resources,the Department has service area through appropriate capital investment and to have 678 employees last year.we ended fiscal 1996 with 624 actual increased overall efficiency and productivity. environmental stewardship. employees. And,624 is the maximum number of employees we'll have ■Protect employees and the environment by developing and this year. Operations and Maintenance Department implementing comprehensive and costeffective safety systems, policies and procedures. Our new Operations and Maintenance Department includes ■Implement communications programs that support the Districts' all current operations functions as well as all mechanical, mission,promote understanding of our future endeavors and build instrumentation and electrical maintenance. In addition,Plant stronger working relationships with our varied audiences. loos sell $555 Operations is now spit into three separate divisions,Plant No. 1 ■Provide employee support and training to ensure that the Operations,Plant No,2 Operations and Central Generation. Districts have a highly trained and flexible work force. s,11 s,E3 We instituted this restructuring to increase efficiency and to simplify cross training between those functions most central to ■Improve management performance by establishing our mission. accountability at the cost center level and using performance s o measurement and bench marking to enhance productivity. vibt 199293 19930 195596 1M,0, Sources of Revenue How Revenue Is Spent Honesty, Trust and Respect nwzi`ew We aspire to the highest degree of integrity,honesty, trust,and respect in our interactions with each other.our suppliers,our customers and our community. Sources of Revenue Teamwork and Problem Solving We receive our sources of revenue from service and connection fees, We strive to reach Districts'goals through cooperative property tax revenues,investment interest and borrowing, efforts and collaboration with each other and our The Districts average single family residential sewer service fee is$71 per constituencies. We work to solve problems in a creative. year.less then half of the statewide average of$184, Approximately 2.B"., cost effective and safe manner,and we acknowledge team 19 9 6-9 7 of the 1%property tax revenue is earmarked for sanitary sewer service. and individual efforts. This source of revenue is used Exclusively to repay debt service through our Certificates of Participation(COP]funds. Leadership and Commitment Commercial.industrial and other major users are charged per 1,000 We lead by example,acknowledging the value of our BUDGET square feet of building, Significant industrial users are also charged by resources and using them wisely and safely to achieve our the treatment demands of their wastewater discharge, objectives and goals. We are committed to act in the best interests of our employees,our organization and our SUMMARY How Revenue is Spent community. Our revenue is spent on the cost of providing service,including employees' salaries,wages and benefits,debt service,our capital improvements and Learning/Teaching-Talents, Skills and Abilities We continuous) develop ourselves,enhancing our talents. County Sanitation Districts the cost of sel4insurenca, Y P g skills,and abilities,knowing that only through personal of Orange County Joint Works Operating Fund growth and development will we continue to progress as APPROVED BUDGET 1996-97 DETAIL an agency and as individuals. 191 PROJECTED 19YHJ PPFPOVEn SALARIES,WAGES S SENEFITe Recognition/Rewards BELA F..BOEe anL FsA A. u.'.'TOTAWe seek to recognize,acknowledge and reward TOTALSAL<Rea.wAr£9 s eENERTs $377a,sm III a.. contributions to the Districts by our many talented coos/OIST saunlEs s BENEFITS -Spas, 'sus"Lck" NET JOINT OFEMnNC Iao.I ENI sz7'.Ps9.zoo S2zon.OF. employees. MATERIALS.SUPPLIES a SERVICES JASOLINE.PE%L S OIL isecoot amd. INSURANCE <97.CN 1AEJCCO P6MIP5 OBJ— MEeE... SEES. NREI¢FATINosuPPLES S.A. e.1Oe.sm The County Sanitation Oisti of Orange County is a publicly awned wastewater ee9A.0po treatmentagency. Our vwrEe�Nni aRecuEs .mA.Jm eem plants,in Fountain Valley entl HuntlngtOn Beech. , vSINTING S PueucATION 311.1. <+xePC are the third largest facility of their kind west of the Mississippi Riven n1.1m 1Iii CC0 PENTaaL IN amashis RESEARCH s MwITORINo E,SEE pop z9p9eW MEETINGS ANDTFAININa Jae am J a00 To Protect the Public Health and Environment Through 111 UTILITIES es1e,am e.a49,em Excellence in Wastewater systems" - mNITIES NfiE m em. m Y "^ TOTAL MATH SUPS 6 SAI EFEB71Cl0 928 1. --- man I .as...I P,&SEEN. sas.e7eJ10 County Sanitation Districts of orange County — TOTTALJo.FfolIwEMENTs a2�.aL ,IW sE,7so. — vENUE 10em 9ml wnmooOl 10944 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 sae.Joi.em sAsom,m 714-962-2411 IS,MIIPIIa.O.11om $ibu i E55I AGENDA BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. [ In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts'Administrative Offices not less € than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. i In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) i as an emergency item or that there is a need to lake immediate action which need came i to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. .................................................................._........._................._..._............._._................_._........._............................................................i (1) Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance (2) Roll call (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (4) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). r 11/20/96 r (6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) EACH DISTRICT If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. District 1 - October 23, 1996 regular District 2 - October 23, 1996 regular District 3 - October 23, 1996 regular District 5 - October 23, 1996 regular District 6 - October 23, 1996 regular District 7 - October 23, 1996 regular District 11 - October 23, 1996 regular District 13 - October 23, 1996 regular District 14 - October 23, 1996 regular (8) Ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts, by roll call vote, as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) ALL DISTRICTS 10102/96 10/16/96 MISC. Joint Operating Fund - $783,414.37 $431,629.89 $179,773.72 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,303,031.20 298,210.03 0.00 Joint Working Capital Fund - 655,530.53 165,398.83 6,482.80 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 103,717.29 14,496.69 10,000.00 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 105.00 386.70 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 11,148.09 1,402.99 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 27,598.89 137,480.78 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 1,163.12 221.23 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 45.00 163.80 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 232,049.93 3,560.85 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 2,434.22 18.496.28 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 39.30 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 82.01 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 955.48 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 6 &7 JOINT - 213.74 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 15.78 0.00 0.00 $4.121.504.65 $1.071.487.37 $196,256.52 -2- 11/20/96 CONSENT CALENDAR- ITEMS (9) - (14) I All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or I further explanation and unless any particular Rem is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there i will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be i enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an Rem from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by number the Rem to be removed from the consent calendar. i The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (9) CLAIM OF J. D. LINCOLN FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY LOSS RE BAYSIDE DRIVE SEWAGE SPILL. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Refuse to accept the claim for Personal Property Loss and take no action to approve or deny based on being untimely; 2) Deny the claim for Real Property Loss; and 3) Refer to General Counsel and Claims Administrator. DISTRICT NO. 2 (10) ADOPT FINDINGS AND AFFIRMING DECISION RE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OF PORTER PLATING COMPANY, INC. AND JERRY PORTER. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt findings and affirm decision re Administrative Appeal of Porter Plating Company, Inc. and Jerry Porter. (11) ORDER ANNEXATION NO. 75 - BOWLER ANNEXATION: The Director of Engineering requests approval of ordering annexation of 0.57 acres of territory in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution ordering Annexation No. 75 - Bowler Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. -3- [CONSENT CALENDAR CONTINUED ON PAGE 41 r 11120/96 (Consent Calendar continued from Page 3) DISTRICT NO. 2 (12) THIRD MODIFICATION OF SEWER EASEMENT WITH UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT NO. 2: The Director of Engineering requests approval for the third modification to the easement for the Fullerton-Brea Purchase Sewer and the Fullerton-Brea Intercepter Sewer, Contract No. 2-25 relocating a portion of the easement around the portion of the trunk sewers found to be outside of the existing easement in the Coyote Hills Golf Course in Fullerton. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize execution of the Third Modification of Sewer Easement provided by Union Oil Company of California for the relocation of a portion of the original easement around a portion of the Fullerton-Brea Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-25, found not to be within the existing easement, at no cost to the District. DISTRICT NOS. 3 AND 11 (13) CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE ORDER NO. 62459 DATED JUNE 10, 1993, WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY: The Director of Engineering requests the approval of Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 62459, re Relocation of Gas Mains to accommodate construction of Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1, increasing the Purchase Order amount by $35,500.00 for a total amount not to exceed $99,500.00. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 62459, issued to Southern California Gas Company, for an addition of$35,500.00, increasing the total contract amount to$99,500.00. DISTRICT NO. 5 (14) QUITCLAIM EASEMENT ON LAND CONTAINING PORTIONS OF THE FORMER CORONA DEL MAR PUMP STATION: The Director of Engineering requests quitclaiming an existing easement to Auto Spa of Corona Del Mar, Inc., new landowner. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the General Manager to approve and execute the Quitclaim Deed. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (15) Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -4- 11/20/96 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR ALL DISTRICTS (16) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Steering Committee re November 20, 1996 meeting. (b) DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 23, 1996. (17) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee re November 6, 1996 Meeting. (b) DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 6, 1996. (c) SPECIFICATION NO. P-157, BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES: The Technical Services Department request approval of: 1)A Biosolids Management Agreement with Tule Ranch/Magan Farms providing for the transportation and management of approximately 1,000 wet tons of biosolids per week; 2) Demonstration Project Agreement with Waste Conversion Industries, Inc. to transport, manage, and chemically convert approximately 200 wet tons of biosolids per week; and 3)Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of Districts' Residual Solids with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. decreasing the cost from $21.92- $28.00 to $20.57-$28.00 per wet ton, depending upon the amount of biosolids transported. (OMTS96-024) RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1)Approve an Agreement with Tule Ranch/Magan Farms for a five-year period to be effective December 2, 1996 through December 1, 2001, for a cost of$19.85 to $25.00 per wet tone according to the technology utilized (estimated annual amount of$655,000.00); 2)Approve Demonstration Project Agreement with Waste Conversion Industries, Inc. for a one year period to be effective December 2, 1996 through December 1, 1997, for a cost of$17.00 per wet ton (estimated annual amount of$170,000.00); and 3)Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of Districts' Residual Solids with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. decreasing the cost from $21.92- $28.00 to $20.57-$28.O0 per wet ton, depending upon the amount of biosolids transported. [ITEM NO. (17) CONTINUED ON PAGE 6] 11/20/96 w (Item No. (17) Continued from Page 5) ALL DISTRICTS (17) (d) PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF SCREENINGS COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT (SPECIFICATION NO. E-270) : The Operations and Maintenance Department requests that the FSM Screenings Compactor Test Report prepared by staff be received and filed and that staff be authorized to proceed with the purchase and installation of screenings compactor equipment. (OMTS96.026) RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Receive and file FSM Screenings Compactor Test Report; and 2)Authorize staff to proceed with the Purchase and Installation of Screenings Compactor Equipment at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 (Specification No. E-270), in an amount not to exceed $150,000.00. Old Business (a) FUNDING OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH FOUNDATION (WERF) TO PERFORM WASTEWATER AND WATER QUALITY RESEARCH TO ADVANCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE WASTEWATER INDUSTRY. (OMTS96-022) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the budgeted funding for the WERF's Wastewater and Water Quality Research subscription from December 1, 1996 through November 30, 1997, in the amount of$63,250.00. ALL DISTRICTS (18) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Planning, Design and Construction Committee re November 7, 1996 Meeting. (b) DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 7, 1996. (c) ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER AND MCKEE, INC. FOR JOB NOS. J-40-1 AND J-40.2 RE PREPARATION OF PHASE I OF STRATEGIC PLAN: The Director of Engineering requests approval of Addendum No. 1 to the PSA providing for added public involvements for Project Nos. 2 and 3 of the first phase of the Strategic Plan (Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, Job No. J-40-1 and Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedules, Job No. J-40-2). (PDC96-054) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. in the amount of$138,985.00 for a total amount not be exceed $1,534,625.00. -6- [ITEM NO. (18) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7) 11/20/96 r ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 6) (18) (d) JOB NO. J-34-1, OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND JOB NO. P2-35-5, PHASE 2 SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2: The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to Advanco Constructors to rebuild an ocean outfall surge tower, landscape adjacent areas, and perform other miscellaneous work. (PDC96-055) RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Receive and file Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications, adding minor work; increasing the contract time from 550 to 730 calendar days; adding new construction scheduling requirements and changing the date for receipt of bids from October 7 to October 15, 1996; 2) Receive and file bid tabulation; and 3)Award contract for Job No. J-34-1, Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, and Job No. P2-35-5, Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2 to Advanco Constructors for construction of said project in the total amount of$7,122,693.00. (a) JOB NO. J-11-2, RESTORATION OF OLD LABORATORY FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT: The Director of Engineering requests an increase in authorized funds of$101,000.00, bringing the project total to$525,000.00 to cover all anticipated costs required to complete the project. (PDC96-057) RECOMMENDED ACTION:Authorize additional funds of$101,000.00 for a project total of$525,000.00 for the Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department. (f) ADDENDUM NO.4 TO MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-40-1, AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-1: The Engineering Department and the Director of Engineering request that the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., be amended providing for additional engineering services for design changes. (PDC96-058) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Addendum No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $244.277.00 for a total amount not to exceed $1,492,244.00. DISTRICT NOS. 5 AND 6 (g) APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO CONTRACT NO. 5-37-3 WITH WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, PHASE 3: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 4, providing for ten items of additional work and granting a time extension of 58 calendar days for completion of the additional work. (PDC96-052) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. 5-73-3 with Wal-Con Construction Company for an addition of$204,943.00 and 58 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$2,645,401.03. -7- 11/20/96 ALL DISTRICTS (19) (a) Verbal Report by Chair of Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee re November 13, 1996 Meeting. (b) DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 13, 1996. (c) TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1996 (FAHR96-064) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1996. (d) RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PURCHASING SYSTEM AND POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES, SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 86-81: The Contracts/Purchasing Manager and General Counsel recommend the adoption of a new Purchasing Resolution to streamline processes, reduce expenditures and provide increased staff efficiency. (FAHR96-066) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Purchasing Resolution repealing Resolution No. 86-81. (a) SELECTION OF DISTRICTS' COMMERCIAL BANK (FAHR96-068) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the selection of Union Bank of California to serve as the Districts' commercial bank for a three (3) year period commencing on January 1, 1997, with the Districts' option to renew for an additional two (2)years thereafter. (f) RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE THE DISTRICTS' COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 PREPARED BY STAFF AND AUDITED BY MORELAND AND ASSOCIATES, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS. (FAHR96-069) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive, file and approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1996. (g) RECEIVE AND FILE THE 1996-1997 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996. (FAHR96-070) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file the 1996-1997 Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter Ended September 30, 1996. -8- 11/20/96 i ALL DISTRICTS (20) APPROVE REVISED SAWPA CONTINUING GUARANTEE AGREEMENT. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution approving a Continuing Guarantee of the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement with SAWPA and each of its five (5) member agencies. (21) Verbal Report to the Boards of Directors by Jim Coleman, Confidential Management Services, Inc. re observations and assessments of the Districts' Corporate Culture. (22) CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on i i this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,the Chair may convene the i Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations,pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8,54956.9,54957 or 54957.6,as noted. Reports relating to(a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation;(c)employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives;or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act,may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Boards on any of these subjects,the j minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. j (a) Convene in dosed session, if necessary (1) Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1),(2), the Boards of Directors will convene to confer with their General Counsel as to one matter. (2) Confer with Districts' Negotiator re MOU Labor Negotiations, Government Code Section 54957.6 (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (23) Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (24) Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report (25) Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) Adjournments -9- 11120/96 i NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards, I Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close of business 14 days I preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all hems submitted by Directors,the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714)962-2411.ext.2026 i Secretary: Patricia L.Jonk (714)962-2411,azl.2029 j Secretary: Janet L.Gray (714)962-2411.ext.2027 J\WPDOCSSVGW6 0V 61A-11. 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 23, 1996 itlCTS OFp9gd � z z � s � a ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 r ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2, 3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 of y Orange County,California,was held on October 23, 1996, at 7:30 p.m., in the Diistrictss'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1,2, 3, 5, 6,7, 11, 13, and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: x Pat McGuigan,Chair _ Ted R. Moreno x_ James M. Ferryman,Chair pro tem _ Arthur Perry x Mark A Murphy _ Joanne Coontz x Thomas R.Saltsrelri Jim Potts x Roger Stanton William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: x Norman Z.Eckenrode,Chair Carol Downey Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tem x John M. Gallbmon • John Collins _ George Scott • Barry Denes _ Bob Bell • Burnie Dunlap _ Glenn Parker • James H. Flora Steve Anderson _y_ Pat McGuigan _ Ted R.Moreno • Mark Murphy Joanne Coontz • Chris Norby Don Bankhead Sheldon Singer x George L.Laket _ * Roger Stanton William G.Steiner * Bob Zemel _ Tom Daly DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A Sapien,Chair Harry M.Dotson Sheldon Singer,Chair pro tern x George L.Zlaket x Walter Bowman _ Gal Kerry x George Brown _ Marilyn Bruce Hastings x John Collins _ George Scott x Burnie Dunlap _ Glenn Parker x James H.Flora Steve Anderson x Don R. Griffin Patsy Marshall a Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer x Wally Linn Eva G.Miner x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno x Chris Norby Don Bankhead _x Margie L Rice James V.Evans x Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner x Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom a Bob Zemel Tom Day DISTRICT NO.5: x Jan Debay, Chair _ John C. Co;Jr. x William G.Steiner,Chair pro tern Roger Stanton x John C.Cm Jr. _ Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.6: x James M. Ferryman,Chair _ Arthur Perry x_ Jan Debay,Chair pro tern John C.Cox,Jr. x William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: x Barry Hammond,Chair _ Mike Ward x Thomas R.Saltarefii,Chew pro tem _ Jim Potts x Jan Debay John C. Cox,Jr. x James M. Ferryman _ Arthur Perry x Pat McGuigan Ted R. Moreno _ x Mark Murphy Joanne Coontz x William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: , a Victor Leipzig,Chair Ralph Bauer x Shirley Dettloff,Chair pro tern _ Ralph Bauer x Roger Stanton _ William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.13: x John M.Gullbreon,Chair Daniel T.Welch a Bob Zemel,Chair pro tem Tom Day x Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker x Mark A Murphy Joanne Coontz x William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: x Thomas R.Saharelfi,Chair Jim Potts _x Mark Murphy,Chair pro tem _ Joanne Coonh x Barry Hammond _ Mike Ward x William G.Steiner Roger Stanton v Peer A.Swan _ Darryl Miller -2- 0 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes v 10/23/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don F. McIntyre, General Manager, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager- Administration, Patricia Jonk, Board Secretary pro tem, John Defile, Janet Gray, Ed Hodges, Bob Ooten, Mike Peterman, Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARY PRO TEM (All Districts) In the absence of Board Secretary Penny Kyle, Joint Chairman John Collins appointed Patricia Jonk as Secretary pro tem. PUBLIC COMMENTS Leslie C. Smith addressed the Boards of Directors regarding consent calendar Item No. 11 on the published agenda concerning Contract No. 11-17-1, Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Districts 3 and 11. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair advised the Directors that the Rate Advisory Committee (RAC) would be meeting Thursday, October 24 from 9:00 a.m. until noon. The Planning Advisory Committee's (PAC) next meeting date would be held Thursday, November 14 from 9:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m. Meetings will be held in the Board Room at Plant No. 1. The following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings were then announced as follows: Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, November 6, at 5:30 p.m. (No meeting scheduled for December) Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, November 7, at 5:30 p.m. (No meeting scheduled for December) Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, November 13, at 5:30 p.m. (Tentative meeting scheduled for December 11) Steering Committee - Wednesday, November 20, at 5:30 p.m. -1- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v Minutes 10/23/96 APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Districts 1.2.3.6.7.11 & 14) There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 25, 1996, and the adjourned meeting held September 21, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Districts 5 & 13) There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 25, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS (All Districts MOTION: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , "B", and "C', attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 09/04/96 9/0 18/96 MISC. Joint Operating Fund - $1.005,194.97 $767,195.92 $ 35.184.64 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 746,224.68 2,541,379.07 0.00 Joint Working Capital Fund - 139,808.59 95,764.38 24,404.04 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 17,332.80 77,075.84 5,148,000.00 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 30.00 29,778.97 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 7,253.33 75,659.53 2.930.24 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 66,004.77 86,119.36 7,997.16 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,818.59 11,413.66 4,444.57 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 180.00 6.047.87 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 24,192.12 140,931.58 968.20 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 10,777.95 16,199.31 992.98 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 868.27 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1,568.33 447.92 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 7,647.67 20.90 5,848.06 DISTRICT NOS. 6 &7 JOINT - 3.082.59 0.00 2,694.11 DISTRICT NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 6,834.67 2,014.71 6,638.52 $2.039.951.06 $3.850.917.29 $5.240.102.52 -2- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes Q 10/23/96 JOB NOS. P1-36-1. P1-38-1. P1-38-4 AND P2-43-3: ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. SECURITY AND LANDSCAPING ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1 MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1 AND TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Domar Electric, Inc. vs. Advanco Construction, a division of Zurn Constructors, Inc., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 769089 relative to a stop notice filed by a subcontractor against Districts' contractor. MOTION: 1) Receive and file Summons and Complaint; and 2) Authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. ADOPT REVISED EXHIBIT TO 1991 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE (All Districts): The Board Secretary, on behalf of General Counsel, requests adoption of a resolution for a revised Exhibit to the Conflict of Interest Code. The revisions are contained within Exhibit A, "Designated Positions." MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 96-82 approving the revisions contained within Exhibit A of the 1991 Conflict of Interest Code. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by John Collins re the October 23, 1996 meeting. MOTION: Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on September 25, 1996. DRAFT AD HOC COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by George Brown re Strategic Plan for the meeting held October 9, 1996. MOTION: Receive and file draft Ad Hoc Committee Minutes re Strategic Plan for the meeting held on October 9, 1996. DRAFT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Pat McGuigan re October 2, 1996 meeting. MOTION: Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 2, 1996. -3- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P Minutes 10/23/96 CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM THE SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (SAWPA) AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL TO EXTEND THE DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR THE STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE AND TO ALLOW THE STRINGFELLOW SITE TO CONNECT DIRECTLY TO THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR IN LIEU OF TRUCK HAULING OF THE TREATED WASTEWATER (OMTS96-23) (All Districts) MOTION: 1) Authorize issuance of an extension to the agreement with Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority for Stringfellow Discharge Permit for five years to December 31, 2001, 2) Authorize the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority to allow the Stringfellow Treatment Facility a direct connection to the Santa Ana River Interceptor; 3) Modify Stringfellow self-monitoring requirements for heavy metals from each final effluent tank to weekly self-monitoring; and 4) Modify Source Control site visits from every time a final effluent tank is discharged to monthly visits. Director Roger R. Stanton stated his objection on this matter for the record. FUNDING OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH FOUNDATION (WERF) TO PERFORM WASTEWATER AND WATER QUALITY RESEARCH TO ADVANCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE WASTEWATER INDUSTRY (OMTS96-22) (All Districts) MOTION: Continue the matter to the next regularly scheduled Joint Boards meeting, November 20, 1996. DRAFT PLANNING, DESIGN. AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts : A verbal report was presented by Barry Hammond re October 3, 1996 meeting. MOTION: Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 3, 1996. -4- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 10/23/96 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS REFUELING STATION, JOB NO. P1-51 (REBID) (PDC96-51) (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests rejection of all bids for Job No. P1-51, and requests approval of plans and specification for rebid and authorization to advertise for bids for construction of a compressed natural gas refueling station and public dispenser. MOTION: 1) Approve Addendum No. 1 to Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51; 2) Receive and file June 25, 1996 letter from Nova Automation withdrawing bid; 3) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation rejecting all bids for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51; 4) Approve an increase in the budget of$184,992, increasing the total budget from $835,374 to $1,020,366 for Compressed Natural Gas Refueling Station, Job No. P1-51 (Rebid); 5) Approve plans and specifications on file at the office of the Board Secretary; 6) Authorize the General Manager to set November 26, 1996 at 11:00 a.m. for bid opening; and 7) Authorize the Board Secretary to publish the Notice Inviting Bids. APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO JOB NO. P1-36-2 WITH MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1 (PDC96-50) (All Districts): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 5 providing for four items of additional work and one credit item. MOTION: Approve Change Order No. 5 to Job No. P1-36-2 with Margate Construction, Inc. for a net addition of$29,251.00, increasing the total contract amount to $34,947,258.00. DRAFT FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by George Brown re October 9, 1996 meeting. MOTION: Receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 9, 1996. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTHS OF AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER 1996 (FAHR96-55) (All Districts) MOTION: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the months of August and September 1996. -5- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v Minutes 10/23/96 ESTABLISH ANNUAL FEES FOR MAILING AGENDA MATERIALS (FAHR 96-56) (All Districts): Board Secretary's Office recommends adoption of a resolution establishing fees for providing agenda-related materials to the general public. MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 96-83 approving the establishment of annual fees for mailing agenda-related materials to the general public. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS LEASE AT PLANT NO. 2 AGREEMENT WITH COX CALIFORNIA PCS, INC.. RE: SPECIFICATION NO. L-017 (FAHR96-63) (All Districts): The Director of General Services Administration requests approving the execution of Wireless Communications Lease at Plant No. 2 Agreement with Cox California PCS, Inc., allowing Cox California to install antennae and other devices on the roof of Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Plant No. 2. MOTION: Authorize execution of Wireless Communications Lease at Plant No. 2 Agreement with Cox California PCS, Inc. (Specification No. L-017) to receive $1,500.00 per month during the 10-year term of the lease, with provisions for four mutually agreeable five-year extensions. PROPOSED COST/BENEFIT METHODOLOGY FOR ALL COST-SAVINGS OR INCOME-GENERATED CIP PROJECTS (FAHR96-59) (All Districts) MOTION: Approve the proposed Cost/Benefit Template, including interest rate of return, for all cost-savings or income-generated CIP Projects; prepare a status report to the FAHR Committee and set an interest rate every six months. AMENDMENT TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR UTILIZATION OF RECLAIMED WASTEWATER AGREEMENT, DATED JUNE 9. 1993, WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT RE GREEN ACRES PROJECT (GAP) WATER. TO INCLUDE A LONG-TERM COMMITMENT TO PURCHASE AND TO SUPPLY RECLAIMED WATER AT A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE PRICE WHICH REFLECTS POTENTIAL OCWD SAVINGS AND DOES NOT EXCEED THE COSTS OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (CURRENTLY $89/AF) (FAHR96-60) (All Districts): An amendment to the 1993 Agreement between CSDOC and OCWD to include a long- term commitment to purchase and supply reclaimed water at a mutually agreeable price. MOTION: 1) Approve the tentative GAP water pricing agreement; and 2) Authorize the General Manager to enter into a final agreement with the OCWD in a form approved by General Counsel. -6- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 10/23/96 AGREEMENT FOR ADJUSTMENT OF DETERMINATION OF OWNERSHIP SHARE IN JOINT FACILITIES PURSUANT TO THE JOINT OWNERSHIP, OPERATION AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN DISTRICTS 1, 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11 AND 13 AND DISTRICT NO. 14 (FAHR96-61) (All Districts) MOTION: Approve the Agreement for Adjustment of Determination of Ownership Share in Joint Facilities Pursuant to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement between Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 and District No. 14. TEMPORARY DISCHARGE AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD) FOR THE DISCHARGE OF GROUNDWATER FROM THE EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR PROJECT TO THE DISTRICTS' SEWAGE SYSTEM (FAHR96-58) (District 14): Technical Services Department requests approval of a temporary Discharge Agreement with IRWD for the discharge of groundwater by Silverado Constructors during the approximate two-year Eastern Transportation Corridor construction project. MOTION: Authorize execution of Temporary Discharge Agreement with IRWD for the discharge of groundwater from Silverado Constructors during the approximate two-year Eastern Transportation Corridor construction project. ORDINANCE NO. 132, AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY GRANTING ADDITIONAL SERVICE CREDIT TO ELIGIBLE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LAW OF 1937, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 31641.04 (All Districts): The Director of Human Resources, in conjunction with the FAHR Committee, requests that an Ordinance be adopted providing for two additional years of service credit to eligible Districts' employees who retire between January 1 and March 31, 1997, in accordance with provisions of Government Code Section 31641.04. MOTION: 1) Second reading of proposed Ordinance No. 132 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance; and 2) Adopt Ordinance No. 132. -7- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County u Minutes 10/23/96 PURCHASE OF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SYSTEMS, SPECIFICATION NO. E-269 (All Districts): The Purchasing Manager, in conjunction with the Director of Engineering and the Director of Human Resources, requests that a purchase contract be issued to Centrepointe Commercial Interiors for the purchase of office systems for 17 work stations, in an estimated amount not to exceed $69,722, plus tax and shipping. MOTION: Authorize the issuance of a sole source purchase contract for Purchase of Human Resources Office Systems to Centrepointe Commercial Interiors, (Specification No. E-269), in an estimated amount not to exceed $69,722, plus tax and shipping. GENERAL COUNSEL'S COMMENTS PRIOR TO CLOSED SESSION (All Districts): General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a Closed Session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to discuss and consider the item specified as Item No. 23(a)(1) on the published agenda. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956(b)(2) (All Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at 8:30 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956(b)(2). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings No action was taken re Agenda Item No. 23(a)(1). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 9:22 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. UTILITY AGREEMENT WITH CALTRANS DISTRICT 12 AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY (District 2): The Engineering Department requests approval of an agreement that provides for reimbursement of inspection costs to Sanitation District No. 2 by Caltrans and permission for Caltrans to adjust a manhole to grade and protect the Santa Ana River Intercepter, Contract No. 2-14-1 in place to accommodate the 1-5 Freeway Widening Project, Segment Al. MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 96-84-2 approving the Utility Agreement No. 12462 with Caltrans District 12 providing reimbursement to County Sanitation District No. 2, of inspection costs estimated at $2,500. -9- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes ° 10/23/96 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (OCFCD) AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY (District 3): The Engineering Department requests approval of an agreement that provides for reimbursement by District No. 3 to OCFCD for construction and administration costs for OCFCD to rebuild a portion of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-46, on behalf of District No. 3, during the OCFCD construction project to modify and rebuild the Brea Creek Channel in the City of Buena Park at Kingman Avenue, just north of Franklin Street. MOTION: Adopt Resolution No. 96-85-3, authorizing execution of Reimbursement Agreement with Orange County Flood Control District allowing County Sanitation District No. 3 to deposit the sum of$100,000 to OCFCD for the cost of construction and administration of the County Sanitation District No. 3 portion of the OCFCD Brea Creek Channel construction contract. CONTRACT NO. 3-35R-1, MAGNOLIA RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, WESTMINSTER AVENUE TO TRASK AVENUE (District No. 3): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to replace a portion of the existing Magnolia Trunk Sewer identified as insufficient in capacity by the 1989 Master Plan. MOTION: 1) Approve Addenda No. 1 and 2 making miscellaneous clarifications and corrections; 2) Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and 3) Authorize award of contract to Mike Prlich & Sons for Contract No. 3-35R-1, Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Westminster Avenue to Trask Avenue, to replace a portion of the existing Magnolia Trunk Sewer identified as insufficient in capacity by the 1989 Master Plan, in a total amount of $1,808,440.00. CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1. SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (Districts Nos. 3 and 11): Receive and file Summons and Complaint, Leslie C. and Rosemary F. Smith, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 768088, relative to alleged property damage due to the construction of the Slater Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 11-17-1. Leslie C. Smith addressed the Boards of Directors regarding a pool leak and damage to his home which occurred during and subsequent to the construction of the pump station. He advised that he had filed a claim with the Districts, which had been denied. In August 1996 he stated he filed a lawsuit. Mr. Smith explained that he was seeking further documentation from the Districts about what might have caused the damage to his home. -9- - County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 10/23/96 Tom Woodruff, General Counsel, responded that to waive court rules relative to discovery would pose a potential risk to the Districts as the defense had been tendered to the insurance company. Mr. Woodruff advised that Mr. Smith would eventually obtain that information through the discovery process and that the time delay would not, in his opinion, prejudice Mr. Smith's position. MOTION: 1) Receive and file Summons and Complaint, and 2) Authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DIRECTORS' COMMENTS: Director Jan Debay requested a status report on the methane gas along Pacific Coast Highway. Bob Oolen, Director of Operations and Maintenance, advised that staff would contact Ms. Debay about her concerns. The Joint Chair advised Ms. Debay that if she wished further information than that provided by staff, she should advise the Board Secretary's Office that she wished the matter agendized. ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:22 p.m. ZGcG� Secretary pro tem of th ards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 -10- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OM9196 PAGE 1 c REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/04/96 POSTING DATE 09104/96 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154017 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $939.44 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154018 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $19.34 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 164019 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $9.29 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154020 ASATUL ENVIRONMENTAL $1,682.94 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154021 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING S EQUIP. $259.30 HARDWARE 154022 ACTS INC $43.10 MANAGEMENT TRAINING VIDEO 154023 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $1,885.63 MANHOLE FRAMES&COVERS 154024 AMERIDATA $5,946.72 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 154025 AMERICAN AIRLINES $4,174.70 TRAVEL SERVICES M06-26-H 154025 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $49.153.74 NATURAL GAS MO 6-28.95 154027 ANALYSTSINC $240.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 154028 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $315.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154029 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $104.83 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154030 AQUATIC BIOASSAY B CONSULT $2,835.00 LAB SERVICES 154031 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $5,628.72 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 154032 AZIMUTH TECHNOLOGIES INC $14,653.12 SOFTWARE fn 154033 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $75.41 AUTO PARTS = 154034 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $5.50 WASTE DISPOSAL 154035 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $1,350.00 LAB ANALYSIS 154036 BANANA BLUEPRINT $1,786.63 PRINTING M.O.11-07-94 -{ 154037 BANKOFAMERICA $173.21 BANKING SERVICES n 154038 BAUER COMPRESSOR $82.56 COMPRESSOR PARTS 1 154039 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $940.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 154040 BENCHMARK PUBLISHING CO $3,750.00 ADVERTISING SPACE 154041 BIO-GRO DIVISION $92.646.73 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26.95 154042 BNA COMMUNICATIONS INC $1,407.61 PUBLICATION 154043 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $2,362.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES 154044 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $71.61 GENERATORS 154045 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $123.89 INSTRUMENT 154046 BUDGET JANITORIAL $485.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 154047 BNI BOOKS $108.07 PUBLICATIONS 154048 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $2.344.50 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154049 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $119.80 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 154050 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $1.125.00 RELOCATE PHONES 164051 CS COMPANY $1.705.64 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154052 CALIFORNIA AUTO REFRIGERATION $391.06 AUTO PARTS 154053 CALIF CENTRIFUGAL PUMP $2.213.00 PUMP PARTS 154054 CALOLYMPIC GLOVE S SAFETY $1.279.79 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154055 CAMP DRESSER&MCKEY INC $114.026.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 154056 CANUS CORPORATION $1.900.62 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 154057 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $98.001.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES NO 0-23-95,5-24-95,6.28-95 154058 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL MIT. $3.106.15 OFFICE FURNITURE 154059 CLAYTON CONTROLS $193.51 LAB SUPPLIES 154060 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $5,864.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154051 COLD SAWS OF AMERICA,INC. $160,55 TOOLS 154062 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $538.02 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0829196 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09104N6 POSTING DATE 09104MS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1.. 164063 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $52,410.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M010-2595 154084 COMPUSERVE $138.05 COMPUTER SERVICES 154065 CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS $177.20 DOCUMENTHANDLING 154066 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST $3,214.98 ELECTRICPARTS 154057 CONSUMER PIPE $673.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154068 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY S213,38 TOOLS 154069 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC. $2.344.97 LAB SUPPLIES 154070 CONTROL CABLES INC $118.86 AUTO PARTS 154071 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $18,623.22 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11-93 154072 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $527.52 ENGINE PARTS 154073 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1.002.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154074 JAMES COWAN $44.00 EXPENSE REIMS. 154076 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $133.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154076 DCC/CAL INC $1.993.30 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154077 J.W.D'ANGELO CO,INC. $94.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES m 154070 ALBERT W.DAMES,INC. $3.450.00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE X 154079 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $190.00 BIOSOUDS ANAYSIS s 154080 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $430.17 VALVES 154081 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $286.53 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 154082 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 154083 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $3,798.01 PAINT SUPPLIES y 154084 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO. $21,463.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES I 154085 ESP NORTH $119.60 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES N 154086 EASTERN ELECTRIC $1,323.82 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154087 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $92.86 AUTO PARTS 154088 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $170.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154089 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.624-95 IS4090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1.273.40 LAB SERVICES 154091 EVENTUS SOFTWARE $522.59 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154092 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $91.80 AIR FREIGHT 164093 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $10,988.24 FILTERS 154094 FIRSTCHOICE $759.72 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 154095 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,839.70 LAB SUPPLIES 154096 FLICKINGER CO $3.473.86 VALVE 154097 FLO-SYSTEMS $9.577.30 PUMP PARTS 1540B8 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $80.75 PHOTO SUPPLIES 1640B9 FRYS ELECTRONICS $6.041.71 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 154100 GKK CORPORATION $7.742.89 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 164101 GENERAL PUMP $360.00 PUMP TEST ' 154102 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $101.16 TELEPHONE SERVICES 164103 GENICOM CORPORATION $839.00 PRINTING SUPPLIES 154104 GIERUCF MITCHELL,INC. $329.95 PUMP PARTS 154105 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $50.00 PUMP PARTS 154105 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $180.00 PUBLICATIONS 154107 WWGRAINGER,INC. $90.03 COMPRESSOR PARTS 154108 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $243.52 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OBU9196 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09104196 POSTING DATE 09M/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154109 GRASSY S.T.I. $942.26 ENGINE PARTS 154110 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $2.000.35 PRINTING 154111 DGA CONSULTANTS $9.822.33 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6.8-94 154112 HACH COMPANY $3,388.42 LAB SUPPLIES 154113 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,107.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154114 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $5,161.23 LAB EQUIPMENT 154115 PL HAWN CO,INC. $321.83 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 154118 HOSTLER'S MAILERS SERVICE INC $476.28 MAILING SERVICES 154117 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $31.04 PAINT SUPPLIES _ 154118 HUNTINGTON LAUNDRYMAT $182.27 OVERCHARGE REFUND 154119 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $79.30 HEX BOLTS 154120 IPCO SAFETY $880.87 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154121 ISA 96 $305.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 154122 ISCO,INC. $218.29 INSTRUMENT 154123 IMAGING PLUS $1,437.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES f1l 154124 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $25.27 CONNECTORS X 154125 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $13.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES = 154126 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $28.93 WATER USE 154127 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $576.68 PRINTING ,--, 16412B GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $1.066.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES --f 154129 JONAN US CORP $378.06 OVERCHARGE REFUND D 154130 KMI INDUSTRIES $76.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154131 KEENAN SUPPLY $155.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES W 154132 KELAR CORPORATION $54.787.84 SOFTWARE B TRAINING 154133 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $91.684.50 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95 154134 KETEMAIRODAN $19.81 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1541139 KING BEARING,INC. $2.985.58 MACHINE SUPPLIES 154136 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.301.24 TOOLS 164137 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,467.24 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 154138 LAB GLASS $316,68 LAB SUPPLIES 154130 LIMITORQUE CORP. $1.980.94 ELECTRIC PARTS 154140 SOCO-LYNCH CORP. $778.56 JANITORIAL SERVICES 154141 MACOMCO $464.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 134142 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. $610.25 VALVE 154143 MAMCO INTERNATIONAL $760.28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154144 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $556.95 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154145 MARDEN SUSCO,INC. $10.00 REFUND OVERPAYMENT FOR PLANS 154146 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $387.21 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154147 MC JUNKIN CORP $1.460.90 PLUMBING SUPPLIES ' 154148 MCWELCO RACK-N-BOX CO $5,505.05 TOOLBOXES 154149 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $1,207A1 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154150 LES MILLER $13.01 REFUND OVERCHARGES 154151 MISSION INDUSTRIES $2,30705 UNIFORM RENTALS 154152 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC $360.85 PUBLICATIONS 154153 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $375.00 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 164164 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $75347 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE O8MD/96 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAAD09/04M POSTING DATE 09104/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154155 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $40.05 WATER USE ` 154156 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $21,180.81 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 154157 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1,720.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154158 OMNI WESTERN INC $3,253.58 TOOLS 154159 ROBERT J.OOTEN $170.23 EXPENSE REIMB. 154160 ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS JOURNAL $800.00 NOTICES&ADS 154161 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $131.02 CHEMICALS 154162 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $50.00 BUSINESS INFO LUNCHEON 154153 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $72.11 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES . 154164 ORANGE COURIER S144A5 COURIER SERVICES 164185 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $574.24 FITTINGS 154165 COUNTY OF ORANGE $345.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 154167 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4.806.50 PERMITS 15416E PSSI $6.246.00 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 164169 PACIFIC PARTS $7.356.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS m 154170 PACIFIC BELL $1.210.20 TELEPHONE SERVICES x 154171 PARTS UNLIMITED $220.12 TRUCK PARTS 2 154172 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $660.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CV 154173 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $365.95 REIMB.PETTY CASH 154174 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $107.198.10 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 -1 154175 U.S.FILTER AND I OR $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES n 154176 POLYPURE,INC. $28,198.12 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92 154177 POWER DESIGN $1.425.11 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS r 154178 PRITCHETT AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $112.17 PUBLICATION 154179 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $981.25 PUMP PARTS 1541BO RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $888.83 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 154181 R&R INSTRUMENTS $312.10 ELECTRIC PARTS 154182 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $241.88 LAB SUPPLIES 154183 BOLT DELIVERY $102.00 FREIGHT 154184 THE REGISTER $947.20 NOTICES&ADS 164185 REMEDYTEMP $59,554.57 TEMP.EMPLOYMENT SERVICES B SUMMER PROGRAM 154156 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $256.11 OUTSIDE PRINTING 154187 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $161.24 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154188 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT'L $225,899.71 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.SA-94 164189 SCIENTIFIC REFRIGERATION $160.00 REPAIR OVEN 154190 SCIENTIFIC SPRAY FINISHERS $670.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 154191 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $88.56 SPECIALTY GASES 154192 SEARS ROEBUCK&CO $495.87 REFRIGERATOR 154193 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $189.11 METER CONNECTOR 154194 SEWER EQUIP CO OF AMERICA $613.21 TRUCK PARTS _ 154195 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $5,775.19 TOOLS 154196 SHASTA ELECTRIC $82,458.00 CONSTRUCTION J-31-2 154197 SHURELUCK SALES $2.040.46 TOOLSAIARDWARE 154198 M.LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS&ASSN $367.00 SUBSCRIPTION 154199 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $331.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 164200 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0829196 PAGE 5 c - REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0RANXIS POSTING DATE 09/04/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 15420 SCAP ,000.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP ODES 15/202 $82 SO CALIF EDISON CO E62,669.57 POWER 154203 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $22,851.35 NATURAL GAS 164204 SO CALIF MARINE INSTITUTE $880.00 OCEAN MONITORING 154205 SUPELCO,INC. $687.93 LAB SUPPLIES 154208 SUPER CHEM CORP. $406.82 CHEMICALS 154207 SUPER ICE CORP. $88.42 LAB SUPPLIES 154208 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $386.470.50 CONSTRUCTION P2-35.3,P246,PI-3M.P2.55 154209 TABBY ENGINEERING $11.008.00 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154210 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $527.24 VEHICLE RENTAL FOR SURVEILLANCE 154211 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,056.11 MECHANICAL PARTS 154212 THORPE INSULATION $62.88 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154213 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $41.28 CABLE SERVICES 164214 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $272.95 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154215 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $250.68 LOCKS 8 KEYS 154216 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $134.16 TRUCK PARTS TTI 154217 TRUESDAILLABS $953.00 LAB SERVICES X 164278 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $21025 TRUCK PARTS 154219 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $5920 LAB SUPPLIES bc1 154220 UNISOURCEB/OR BUTLER PAPER $6,258.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154221 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $22.32 PARCEL SERVICES 154222 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2.270.58 LAB SUPPLIES n 154223 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $247.61 PLUMBING SUPPUES 154224 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $540.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 154225 VALVATE ASSOCIATES 3302.31 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154226 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $5.874.02 FREIGHT 154227 VERNE'S PLUMBING $1,499XD PLUMBING SERVICES 154228 VILLAGE NURSERIES $27.70 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 154229 WACKENHUT CORP. $4,938.84 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 154230 WAXIE $641.01 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154231 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23.403.87 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23.95 154232 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $1.970.47 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE M04-24-96 164233 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC. $379.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 154234 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN B SMART $91.327.30 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-26.95 164235 XEROX CORP. $153.01 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/U496 $2,038.851.08 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0829196 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/04/96 POSTING DATE 09104196 SUMMARY AMOUNT \ 01 OPER FUND $30.00 92 OPER FUND $7,253.33 #3 OPER FUND $24.391.60 #3 CAP FAC FUND $41.613.27 #5 OPER FUND E3.818.59 #6 OPER FUND $180.00 #7 OPER FUND $20,438.12 97 CAP FAC FUND $3,754.00 #11 OPER FUND $2,422.52 #11 CAP FAC FUND $8,355.43 #14 OPER FUND $1.568.33 #586 OPER FUND 57,647.67 #687 OPER FUND $3.082.69 #7814 OPER FUND $6.834.67 m JT OPER FUND $1.005.194.97 X CORF $746.224.68 2 SELF-FUNDED RK INSURANCE FUND E17,SW.80 � JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL E739.808.59 D E2,039.851.06 O1 FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 09111198 PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0911BI98 POSTING DATE 09118I96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154265 ATB T-MEGACOM SERVICE $3,164.03 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154266 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING B EQUIP. $93.15 HARDWARE 154287 ACCU STANDARD $143.09 LAB SUPPLIES 164268 AIR PHOTO SERVICES $295.32 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 154269 AIR PRODUCTS 8 CHEMICALS $36,644.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9.89 154270 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $2.155.00 MANHOLE FRAMES B COVERS 154271 ALLIANCE FOR REDESIGN GOVT. $139.00 SUBSCRIPTION 154272 AMERIDATA $410.53 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 154273 AMERICAN BANKER NEWSLETTERS $59500 SUBSCRIPTION _ 154274 AMERICAN BUILDING $41.85 PUBLICATION 154275 AMERICAN COMPUTER B COMM. $149.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 154276 AMERICAN SIGMA $3.961.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154277 AMOCO ENERGY TRADING $66,750.07 NATURAL GAS MO 6-28-95 154278 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $93.26 EXPENSE REIMB. 164270 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $12,702.65 PLANT AUTOMATION SUPPLIES 154280 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $365.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT fT1 154281 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $431.67 NOTICES 8 ADS X 164282 ADS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $849.76 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 2 .. 154283 ARMOR-VAC $888.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 154294 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $2,071.97 PAYROLL SERVICES .� 1542B5 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $742.50 LAB ANALYSIS 154286 THESALBOABAYCLUB $328.07 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON i 154287 BANK OF AMERICA $164.08 BANKING SERVICES I� 154288 BARCLAYS BANK PLC $98.042.00 COP LETTER OF CREDIT 154289 LAYNE BAROLDI $835.44 EXPENSE REIMB. 154290 BARR LUMBER CO $1,536.08 LUMBER 154291 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $607.20 BATTERIES _ 154292 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $57.70 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 154293 BID-GRO DIVISION $74.799.32 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4.2&95 154294 BONA-RUES $258.10 TRUCK PARTS 154295 THE BOND BUYER $150.00 REGISTRATION 154296 BRANDALL MODULAR CORP $112,336.00 INFO TECH TRAILER MO 4.24-96 154297 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.815.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-1244 154298 BNI BOOKS $51.61 PUBLICATION 154299 THE BUREAU OF NATL AFFAIRS $1.064.09 SUBSCRIPTION 164300 BUSINESS PUBLISHERS INC $351 00 SUBSCRIPTION 164301 CCI TECHNOLOGIES $5,658.00 RELOCATE PHONES 154302 CLE INTERNATIONAL $405.00 TRAINING VIDEO . 154303 CS COMPANY $2,301.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154304 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $6,336.00 CONSTRUCTION 7-22 S 7.24 154305 CALTROL,INC. $956.24 HARDWARE 154306 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $259.76 SERVICEAGREEMENT ' 164307 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $6.842.86 MECHANICAL PARTS 154308 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $228,00 FILE MAINTENANCE 154309 CALIFORNIA SUPPRESSION SYSTEM $589.00 HALON MAINTENANCE 164310 CALLAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $3,750.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 091111M PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09118M POSTING DATE 09I1SM6 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154311 CALOLYMPIC GLOVE 8 SAFETY $118.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154312 CANUS CORPORATION $565.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLE 154313 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS $79.00 REGISTRATION 154314 CARLETON ENGINEERS 53,086A0 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 164315 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $46.017.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 4-14-93,3-27-96,5.12.93 154318 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $2.696.22 OFFICE FURNITURE 164317 CENTURY SAFETY INST.8 SUPPLY $6.275.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154318 CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 154319 CHEMINEER INC $5.052.05 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154320 CLARKE CONTRACTING CO $116.732.94 CONSTRUCTION 7-14-2 164321 COLEMAN I CASKEY ARCHITECTS $42,930.44 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J-38-1 154322 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $139.21 LAB SUPPLIES 154323 COUCH 8 SONS $12,375.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 154324 COMMUNICATION BRIEFINGS $79.00 SUBSCRIPTION 154325 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GRP $631.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 10.25-95 X 154326 COMPUTERS AMERICA $119.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES = 154327 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $404.72 TRUCK PARTS .. 154328 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST $5.468.79 ELECTRIC PARTS 154329 CONSUMER PIPE $36.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154330 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT 6 SUPPLY $122.71 TOOLS 154331 CORPORATE ENVIRON STRATEGY $185.00 SUBSCRIPTION W 154332 JOHN C.COX,JR. $507.23 CASA EXPENSE REIMB. N 154333 J.W.IYANGELO CO,INC. $946.05 VALVES 154335 JARCELD $309.60 CASACATION EXPENSE REIMB. 164338 MERCER ANALYTICAL INC. $840.00 PUBLICATIONS 154337 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL §869.60 PROFESDENTAL INSURANCE NCESER ICES PLAN 154338 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $/$940.00 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-04 154339 DUNN ED ARDS CORP.COMPANY $843.66 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 154339 DUNN EOWARDS ORP. §843.68 PAINT SUPPLIES 154340 ENS RESOURCES $1,818.75 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154341 ESP NORTH $2,048.46 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154342 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $326.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154343 EMPIRE SCALES CO $144.00 PRINTER MAINTENANCE 154344 ENCHANTER,INC. $350000 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-24-95 154345 EP(THE EXECUTIVE PROGRAM) $41.19 PUBLICATION 154346 FASTFRAME OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $72.19 AWARDS FRAMING 154347 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $249AS AIR FREIGHT 154348 FIRST CHOICE $591.91 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 154349 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $111.05 LAB SUPPLIES 154350 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $418.27 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154351 FLOSYSTEMS $380.15 PUMP PARTS 164352 FORD SAUVAJOT MGMT GROUP $1.323.48 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 154353 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $93.74 PHOTO SUPPLIES 154354 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $687.05 WATER USE 164355 FRYS ELECTRONICS $59.21 ELECTRONIC 6 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 164366 GIST.INC. $352.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09111M PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09118/96 POSTING DATE 0911B/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154357 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $81.99 LUMBER+MDWARE 154358 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.216.94 TELEPHONE SERVICES 164359 GERHARDTS INC $746.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 154360 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $171.97 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 154361 DR.ROGER H.GREEN $1,400.00 LAB ANALYSIS 154362 HARTZELL FAN $6,182.05 EXHAUST FANS 154363 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $4,365.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 154364 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 154365 HIGHWAY PRODUCTS $1,106.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154366 HILTI,INC. $946.06 TOOLS 154367 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $22,455.77 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d4 154368 HOME DEPOT $643.18 SMALL HARDWARE 154369 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $277.98 PAINT SUPPLIES 154370 HUNSAKER&ASSOC IRVINE,INC $266.00 SEWER EASEMENT RELOCATION Tn 154371 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,776.50 WATER USE X 154372 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $100.00 WATER SERVICE DEPOSIT s 164373 1 C M A DISTRIBUTION CTR $133.60 PUBLICATIONS 154374 ISI INFORTEXT $1.408.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT ,... 154375 INSIDE EPA $1,020.00 SUBSCRIPTION —1 154376 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.124.97 BATTERIES UJ 154377 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $9.80 WATER USE I 154378 DEE JASPAR&ASSOC $150.96 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES W 154379 JAYS CATERING $92.35 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 154390 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $616.28 ELECTRIC PARTS 154381 KEENAN SUPPLY $1,609.25 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154382 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $36,723.96 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 154383 KING BEARING,INC. $2.327.95 MACHINE SUPPLIES 164384 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $107.06 TOOLS 164385 LAB GLASS $225.53 LAB SUPPLIES 154386 LANDSCAPE PEST MGMT $1,400.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154387 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $3,713.00 SOIL TESTING 7.13.94 154388 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $22,944.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pi40.2 154389 LOS ANGELES TIMES $912.00 NOTICES&ADS 154390 MPS $210.98 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 154391 MSA $1.573.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154392 MAINTENANCE TECHNOLGY CORP. $609.65 WELDING SUPPLIES 154393 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $73.325.98 CONSTRUCTION P7<1,P143 154394 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $2.049,272.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2 154395 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $10.714.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 154396 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $197.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES _ 154397 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $1.475.08 EXPENSE REIMS. 154398 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $283.33 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 164399 METERMASTER INC $1,215.64 METER 154400 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $6,17728 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 154401 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $161.63 LAB SUPPLIES 164402 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $98.17 GLOVES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 09I11M PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09N8M POSTING DATE 09110M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 164403 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,076.84 UNIFORM RENTALS 164404 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $439.00 INSTRUMENT 164405 MICHAEL D.MOORE $835.45 EXPENSE REIMB. 15440E MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $28.646.25 AUDITING SERVICES MO 3.8-95 154407 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1.274.90 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 164408 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $7.00 WATER USE 154409 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $1,243.80 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL 164410 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $100.60 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 164411 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $351.80 SAFETY GLASSES 164412 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $1.034.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154413 OMNI WESTERN INC $685.48 TOOLS. 154414 ORACLE CORPORATION $14,584.32 SOFTWARE LICENSE 154416 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $25.00 REGISTRATION 164416 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING 00. $1.590.06 FITTINGS 164417 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES-TAXABLE COMER.PAPER X 164418 ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $425.52 SERVICE AGREEMENT = 164419 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.012.20 SPECIALTY GASES 164420 COUNTY OF ORANGE $53.521.60 PROPERTY ATTRIBUTES 1OW07 t7J 164421 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $53.891.76 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 154422 COUNTY OF ORANGE $248.50 PERMITS 154423 P&D CONSULTANTS INC $930.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES W 164424 PSSI $3.642.85 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION r 154425 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS $158.54 PUBLICATION ' 154426 PACIFIC BELL $18.83 TELEPHONE SERVICES 164427 PADGETT-THOMPSON $700.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154426 PAGENET $766.05 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 154429 PAINE WEBBER $61,394.69 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENTS 164430 PARAMOUNT TANK INC $538.21 INSPECTION 154431 PARKER HANNIFIN CORP. $217.36 REGULATOR 154432 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $1,200.83 TIRES 164433 PASCAL&LUDWIG $50,278.00 CONSTRUCTION P7.384 164434 PERMA SEAL $187.28 LUBE OIL 154435 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $68211 REIMB.PETTY CASH 164436 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $123,696.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3.29.95 164437 POLYPURE,INC. $18,202.94 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 154436 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $328.53 CHEMICALS 164439 POWER DESIGN $1.393.21 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 164440 POWERSYSTEMS $210.63 MAINTENANCE 154441 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $176.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 154442 PULSAFEEDER $660.84 PUMP PARTS 164443 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $495.31 PUMP PARTS 194444 DUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $167A4 BUILDING MATERIALS 154445 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $150.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 154446 R M CONTROLS $420.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154447 R&R INSTRUMENTS $3,349AS ELECTRIC PARTS 154448 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2,002.72 TRASH REMOVAL FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09111M PAGES e REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/18/96 POSTING DATE 09118M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154449 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $102.43 LAB SUPPLIES 154450 RANCHO SANTIAGO COLL I OCTOA $78.00 REGISTRATION 154451 REAL TIME SYSTEMS COR E10,000.00 INTEGRATION SERVICES 154452 RED WING SHOES $151.71 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 154453 BOLT DELIVERY E149.40 FREIGHT 154454 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $320.00 OCEAN MONITORING 154455 REMEDYTEMP $13.354.12 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 154456 SPSS,INC. $44.95 PUBLICATION 154457 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS E210.11 OUTSIDE PRINTING SERVICES 154458 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS E2,576.86 ELECTRIC PARTS 154459 SAVANT $15.00 FREIGHT 154460 SCHWIND AMERICA,INC. $718.97 PUMP PARTS 154461 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $87,496.67 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6.8-94 154452 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $551.68 SPECIALTY GASES 154463 SEMINARS INTERNATIONAL $59.00 REGISTRATION 154464 SEWER EQUIP CO OF FLORIDA $1,343.20 MISC HARWARE m 154465 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $986.55 TOOLS X 154466 SHURELUCKSALES $5.393.11 TOOLSBIARDWARE = 154467 SMI WEMERYCO. $4.003.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 .. bU 15dd68 SO COAST AIR QUALITY E7,84310 PERMIT FEES 154469 SOUTH COAST WATER $160.00 LAB SUPPLIES 154470 50 CALIF EDISON CO $19.06 POWER LA 164471 SO CALIF EDISON CO $58.136.09 POWER 154472 80.CAL.GAS.CO. $4,714.66 NATURAL GAS 154473 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $61.22 WATER USE 154474 SPECTRUM QUALITY PROD $1,103.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154475 SPEXCERTIPREPINC. $709.58 LAB SUPPLIES 154476 STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING $189.68 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154477 JOHN D.STEPHENS $667.85 EXPENSE REIMS. 154476 SUNSETFORD $110.00 TRUCK PARTS 154479 SUPER CHEM CORP. $810.88 CHEMICALS 154480 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $538.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154481 SYMCAS $3.437.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 154482 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $65.662.03 ELECTRIC CARTS 154483 TECHNIC COMPUTER SERVICE CORP $3,600.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 154484 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $3232.52 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM 164455 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $556.60 MECHANICAL PARTS 154486 TRISTATE SEMINAR ON-THE-RIVER $30.00 REGISTRATION 164467 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3.973.04 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5.11.94 154488 TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $370.86 TRUCK PARTS 154489 JG TUCKER B S0N,INC. E1,184AI INSTRUMENT PARTS 154490 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $19.03 PARCEL SERVICES 154491 DATAVAULT I US SAFE DEPOSIT CO $254.00 BACK-UP TAPE STORAGE 154492 U S POSTAL SERVICE E5,OOD.00 POSTAGE 154493 VWR SCIENTIFIC $12.114.06 LAB SUPPLIES 154494 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1.471.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O9 I/95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/18196 POSTING DATE 09/18M6 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTON 154495 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $151.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES ' 154496 VERNE'S PLUMBING $211.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 154497 VERTEX SYSTEMS $3.510.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 154498 WACKENHUTCORP. $12.663.05 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 154499 CARL WARREN&CO. $1.903.08 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 154500 WARRINGTON $721.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154501 WASTE MARKETS $13.751.02 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 3-27-M 154502 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION $89.00 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 154503 K.H.WATTS CO $56.03 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 154504 WAYNE ELECTRIC $2.591.40 AUTO SUPPLIES 154505 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $475.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154506 WEFTEC'96 $395.00 REGISTRATION 164507 THE WASTEWATER CONNECTION $596.08 FREIGHT 164505 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $14.548.39 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95 154509 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $6.322.08 CAUSTIC SODA MO 5-23-95 fTl 154510 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $40.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 154511 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL $503.47 TRUCK PARTS = 154512 NANCY WHEATLEY $534.39 EXPENSE REIMB. �--' 154513 JUDITHA.WILSON $84.38 EXPENSE REIMB. i-- 164614 WTTEG $667.44 LAB SUPPLIES —I 154515 WOODRUFF,SPRADUN&SMART E38,668.16 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-2695 154516 WORDPERFECT CORP E45.97 SUBSCRIPTION I 154517 XEROX CORP. $4,683.90 COPIER LEASES cn 154516 YORK INTERNATIONAL $269.64 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 154519 ZYMARK CORP. $5.000.00 LAB EQUIPMENT - TOTAL CLAIMS PAID O9/1SM6 E3,850.917.28 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 09111AM PAGE? o REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09N8196 POSTING DATE 09118196 SUMMARY AMOUNT ' #1 OPER FUND $4,176.53 #1 CONST FUND $25.600.44 #2 OPER FUND $17,020.86 #2 CAP FAC FUND $93D.50 #2 CONST FUND $57,708.17 #3 OPER FUND 27,379.43 #3 CAP FAC FUND 4,788.96 #3 CONST FUND 53,950.97 #5 OPER FUND 3.594.23 #5 CONST FUND $7,819.43 #6 OPER FUND $2.882.22 #6 CONST FUND $3.165.65 07 OPER FUND E71,118.38 m #7 CAP FAC FUND $123.068.94 X #7 CONST FUND $6.744.26 s #11 OPER FUND $11,681A3 #11 CAP FAC FUND $594.18 011 CONST FUND $3,923.70 -1 0136PER FUND $792.12 #13 CONST FUND $76.15 i #14 CONST FUND $447.92 V #5&6 CAP FAC FUND $20.90 #7&14 OPER FUND $2,014.71 JT OPER FUND $767,195.92 CORF $2,541,379.07 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $77,076.84 . JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $95,764.38 E3.850,917.29 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE -VARIOUS PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 09112MO 164520 MICHAEL D.MOORE $835.46 EXPENSE REIMS.\ 09/19/96 154521 CATAPULT INC. $24,740.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 0925/96 154541 ANDY C PATTERSON, JACKIE $100,000.00 PLANT 2 ACCIDENT SETTLEMENT D925/96 154542 DOROTHY M.R.HOLM B HER $833,000.00 PUNT 2 ACCIDENT SETTLEMENT 0925/96 154543 GEORGIANNE MILLER GRDIAN B $525,000.00 PLANT 2 ACCIDENT SETTLEMENT 0925/96 154544 ITT CEBSCO $967.500.00 PLANT 2 ACCIDENT SETTLEMENT 0925/96 154545 ANDY C PATTERSON.ADMNST OF $10.000.00 PLANT 2 ACCIDENT SETTLEMENT 0925196 154646 ROBIN PATTERSON B HER ATTYS $195,000.00 PLANT 2 ACCIDENT SETTLEMENT 0925/96 154547 SAFECO LIFE INSURANCE CO.; $987.500.00 PLANT 2 ACCIDENT SETTLEMENT 0927/96 154612 EDWARD M.TORRES $250.00 CASHADVANCE 10MM6 164813 MICHAEL D.MOORE $920.75 EXPENSE REIMS. 10/03/96 164814 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO $65,296.32 POWER 10/03/96 154815 ANDY C PATTERSON,ADMNSTR OF $10.000.00 PLANT 2 ACCIDENT SETTLEMENT 10/07/96 154816 CSMFO $6000 CSMFOLUNCHEON trI TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $5,240,102S2 a m SUMMARY AMOUNT 92 OPER FUND $2.930.24 93 OPER FUND $7.997 16 95 OPER FUND E4,444.57 97 OPER FUND $968.20 011 OPER FUND $992.98 9586 OPER FUND $5,848 06 9667 OPER FUND $2,694,11 97814 OPER FUND $6.638.52 JT OPER FUND $35,184 64 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $5,148,000.00 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $24.404.04 E5,240,102.52 ❑ COW,INFO.REM Fix N Se[Use OnN AGENDA ❑ COWL ACTION ITEM ITEM ❑ Jr.SOS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT.BUS.DISCUSSION (NON-CONSENT) ❑ PUBLIC HEARING y 9&Jr.SO&MEETING DATE JT.BUS.AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.9 MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION gnnals of Originator) OMTS. OMT$ PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR 2220/Ross H. Tipps 12558 EXEC: EXEC All STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: 11/27/96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: RATIFYING PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS BY ROLL CALL VOTE (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District). Recommended Action(s): Staff recommends approval of payment of claims/warrant listing CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed'. Negative Dedaration Approved on N/A Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination filed on BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES Troia ewee�gm n.n.re.I Schedulefl-me Item'. AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: ScheduieA-me Item'. AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE If YES,stale number: _Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONC RENC ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) To Committee 1 S Da e Divi ion Mana e ( e ignee Sri ture Date To A Bds.. 1. Warrant Listing Dnment Ld(Or Designee) Signature Dale Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date: Approved Amended: Forwarded to: ADDMONAL INFORMATION(Baaground andior Summary) PK:Ig c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager H\WP 0TAT1N@220\TIPPSXCLAIMS.WPO Page 2 of 2 Revision. Bn8M6 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0927196 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/02096 POSTING DATE 10/02M8 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154548 AEES PUBLICATIONS $174.00 PUBLICATION 154549 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $267.42 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154550 AT&T-PROWATTS $939A4 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154551 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $0.21 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154552 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $6.39 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154553 ABATIX ENVIRONMENTAL $338.34 MISC.HARDWARE 154554 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $117.75 DOOR REPAIRS 154555 AIR LIDUIDE AMERICA CORP. $622.45 SPECIALTY GASSES 154556 AIR PHOTO SERVICES $1,129.23 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 154557 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $162.47 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154558 AMERICAN AIRLINES $5.099.95 TRAVEL SERVICES 154559 AMERICAN BUILDING $43.43 SUBSCRIPTION 154560 AMERICAN SIGMA $10.574.72 CONTROLLER SAMPLER 154561 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS INC. $892.44 LAB SUPPLIES 154562 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $150.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154663 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $1,630.00 LAB SERVICES 154564 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $120.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 154565 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SER.INC. $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154568 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $3,879.00 WIRE ROPE 154567 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $810.00 LAB ANALYSIS 154568 THE BALBOA SAY CLUB $3,529.70 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON 164569 BANANA BLUEPRINT $619.66 PRINTING MO 11417-94 154570 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $327.58 BATTERIES 154571 BAUER COMPRESSOR $166.25 COMPRESSOR PARTS 154572 BIO-GRO DIVISION $70,751A7 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 154573 BLACK&VEATCH $848.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146,P2-55 154574 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4.994.21 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.4-14-93 154575 BNA COMMUNICATIONS,INC. $15.00 FREIGHT 154576 BOILER&COMBUSTION $890.00 REGISTRATION 154577 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $258.60 TRUCK REPAIRS 154578 BOOTBARN $96.87 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 154579 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,815.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 154580 BURLINGTON SAFETY LAB INC. $126.00 TESTING SERVICES 154581 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.316.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6A94 154582 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS 154583 CRC PRESS,INC. $112.70 PUBLICATION 154584 CS COMPANY $16,405.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154585 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $163,726.34 CONSTRUCTION 7-22,7-24 154588 CALTROL.INC. $137.21 HARDWARE 154587 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $373.37 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 154588 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $112.24 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154589 CALIF CENTRIFUGAL PUMP $5.110.00 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154590 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $125.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 154591 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTIC $425.00 DIRECT&OVERLAPPING DEBT STATEMENT 154592 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $763.50 MOVING SERVICES 154693 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEY INC $119,113.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J40.1,J40.2 FUNDNO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 09Q7M6 PAGE2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10102A18 POSTING DATE 10102M WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154594 CAPIO $125.00 MEMBERSHIP 154595 PATRICK CARNAHAN $250.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 154596 CARTER-AMER.FLEET SERVICE $171.00 AUTO PARTS 154597 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $80.02 OFFICE FURNITURE 154598 CENTURY SAFETY INST.S SUPPLY $6.05129 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154599 CERTIFIED APPLIANCE CO $51.04 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 154600 CHASE,ROTCHFORD,DRUKKER $30.70 LEGAL SERVICES MO 12-14-94 154601 CLARKE CONTRACTING CO $02.957.03 CONSTRUCTION 7-14-2 154602 CLAYTON CONTROLS $107.97 LAB SUPPLIES 154603 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $433.20 INSPECTION SERVICES 154604 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT S7DB.BB SERVICE AGREEMENT 154605 COLEMAWCASKEY ARCHITECTS $84.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J-38-1 154608 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $452.95 LAB SUPPLIES 154607 COUCH 8 SONS $30,971.70 CONSTRUCTION M-044 154609 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,247.75 PUMP PARTS 1546M COMPUTERS AMERICA $156.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 164610 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4,454.36 ELECTRIC PARTS 154611 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHiWAYS $173.26 FREIGHT 154612 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $334.00 UTILITY TRUCK 154613 CONSUMER PIPE $22.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154614 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT B SUPPLY $52.03 TOOLS 154615 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC. 8789.59 LAB SUPPLIES 154616 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $7,526.27 ENGINE PARTS 154617 CORPORATE EXPRESS $307.34 PUBLICATIONS 154618 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $291.07 TRUCK PARTS 154619 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $102.25 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154620 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 EXEMPTION FEES 154621 JOHN C.COX,JR. $539.71 EXPENSE REIMB. 154622 CHARLES P.CROWLEY.CO. $1,831.76 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154623 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $21.601.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 154824 CA UTILTRES EMERG ASSOC $1,000.00 MEMBERSHIP 154625 DAILY PILOT $48.00 NOTICES 8 ADS 154626 JAMES DARLINGTON $187.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154627 DELL MARKETING L P. $85.153.75 DESKTOP COMPUTERS 154628 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $4,034.71 VALVES 154629 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1.710.06 PAINT SUPPLIES 154630 ENS RESOURCES INC $881.07 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154631 ESP NORTH $183.49 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154632 EASTERN ELECTRIC $12,450.27 TRANSFORMER INSTALLATION 154633 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $53.85 AUTO PARTS 154634 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS SLOG SYS. $90881 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154635 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $619.56 SANDBLASTING SERVICES 154635 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 154637 EXECUTIVE EXCELLENCE $27600 SUBSCRIPTION 154638 EP(THE EXECUTIVE PROGRAM) $43,82 PUBLICATIONS 154639 FLUID TECH.SALES 5343.20 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0927/96 PAGE3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/02/96 POSTING DATE 10/02/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154640 FMC CORPORATION $171.172.72 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 9.14-94 154641 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $95.35 AIR FREIGHT 154642 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $4.075.41 FILTERS 154643 FIRST CHOICE $350.34 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 154644 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,133.83 LAB SUPPLIES 154645 FLOSYSTEMS $5,666.42 PUMP PARTS 154646 FOLSOM LAKE FORD $21.636.04 TRUCK 154647 FORD SAUVAJOT MGMT GROUP $5.623.55 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 154648 FORKERT ENGINEERING B SURVEY $1.230.53 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 5894 154649 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $13.31 PHOTO SUPPLIES 154650 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17,767.80 WATER USE 154651 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $766.46 PAINT SUPPLIES 154652 THE FOXBORO CO $889.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS 164653 FRANKUNOUESTCO E63.1M OFFICE SUPPLIES 154654 FR rS ELECTRONICS $2.622.91 ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 154655 EST,INC. 54,731.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154656 THE GARTNER GROUP 534,500.00 RESEARCH ADVISORY SERVICES 154657 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $342.17 ELECTRIC PARTS 154658 GENERALPETROLEUM $19,677.71 PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE 154659 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.834.49 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1546W GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $209.13 PUMP PARTS 154661 N.GLANTZ&SON INC. $538.75 MISC.HARDWARE 154662 GOLDENWEST WINDOWS $1,658.00 WINDOW CLEANING 154663 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $92.00 PUBLICATION 154664 WW GRAINGER,INC. $171.88 COMPRESSOR PARTS 154665 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $323.25 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 154666 GRASSY S.T.I. $2.089.57 ENGINE PARTS 154667 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $3,220A9 PRINTING 154668 DGA CONSULTANTS 52022.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.8-8-94 154669 GRIFFIN CARRICK $0,179.17 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE M.O.9.2745 154670 HACH COMPANY $3,869.01 LAB SUPPLIES 154671 KEAN HADDEN $574.28 EXPENSE REIMS. 154672 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $523.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154673 R E HART LABS INC $1.357.65 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154674 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT 52,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 154675 HEWLETTPACKARD $327.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154676 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $180.00 REGISTRATION 154677 HOLMES 8 NARVER,INC. $7,311.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES NO 9-14-94 154678 HOME DEPOT $489.07 SMALL HARDWARE 154679 CHRISTINE K.HROUNTAS NO INC 5200.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154680 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $30.92 PAINT SUPPLIES 154681 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,609.50 WATER USE 154682 IPCO SAFETY $4,816.86 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154683 ISCO,INC. $969,75 INSTRUMENT 154684 INFORMATION RESOURCES $125,00 PERSONNEL SERVICES 154685 INTEGRATED COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY $4,678.51 SOFTWARE FUNDNO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0927M PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/07/98 POSTING DATE IOM2= WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154686 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $64.26 WATER USE 154687 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $789.49 PRIMING 154688 JAMISON ENGINEERING $8,40SAO CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 154689 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $611.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154690 DEE JASPAR&ASSOC $28420 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154691 JAYS CATERING $376.44 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 154692 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $555,30 ELECTRIC PARTS 154693 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $910.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154694 KER'HLEY INSTRUMENTS,INC. $1,039.26 MISC.HARDWARE 154695 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $76,252.78 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95 154696 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $4.240.59 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.O.11-15-95 154697 KING BEARING,INC. $1.911.73 MACHINE SUPPLIES 154698 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5.147.37 TOOLS 154699 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY OO. $214.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154700 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $1,309.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 154701 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $4.849.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140.2 154702 LIEBERT CASSIDY&FRIERSON $2,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154703 LIMSILETTER $99.00 SUBSCRIPTION 154704 LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $64.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 154705 MPS $383.45 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 154706 MANTEK $627.99 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES , 154707 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $90.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154708 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $1.081.996.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-2 154709 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $72.046.80 CONSTRUCTION P141 154710 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $135.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154711 GREG MATHEWS $305.32 EXPENSE REIMB. 154712 MCCROMETER $310.23 METER PARTS 154713 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $113.16 EXPENSE REIMB. 154714 MCJUNKIN CORP $924.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154715 WILLIAM M.MERCER INC $705.25 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154716 MESA MUFFLER $205.49 AUTO PARTS 154717 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $12,649.69 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 154718 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $79.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154719 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4.274.76 UNIFORM RENTALS 154720 MICHAEL D.MOORE $01.81 EXPENSE REIMB. 154721 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $113.20 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 154722 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION $90.00 PUBLICATION 154723 NEALSUPPLYCO. $438.55 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154724 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $50.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154725 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $95.00 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 154728 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE $19.450.21 MEDICAL REIMB. 154727 OI CORPORATION $331.26 LAB SUPPLIES 164728 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $3,432.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154729 OLYMPIC CREATIONS $808.24 PINS 154730 ROBERTJ.00TEN $422.16 EXPENSE REIMB. 154731 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $26.00 MEETING EXPENSE FUNONO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0927/96 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10N2M6 POSTING DATE 10102/98 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154732 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $9,153.67 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154733 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $3.114.38 FITTINGS 154734 OXYGEN SERVICE 5681.42 SPECIALTY GASES 154735 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1.200.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 154736 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $410.667.49 REPLACEMENT WARRANT 154737 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $34,807.90 GAP WATER USE M.O.64-93 154738 PC MAGAZINE $26.97 SUBSCRIPTION 154739 PBD CONSULTANTS $1.476.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154740 PSSI $2.654.55 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 154741 PACIFIC BELL $1.285.03 TELEPHONE SERVICES 154742 PACIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS $1.850.00 CONTRACT SERVICES MO 3.27-96 154743 PAGENET $783.90 RENTALEQUIPMENT 154744 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $789.98 REIMB.PETTY CASH 154745 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $128.415.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29.95 154746 THE PLANNING REPORT $199.00 SUBSCRIPTION 154747 U.S.FILTER AND/OR $1,252.75 LAB SUPPLIES 154748 POLYPURE,INC. $21,906.98 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 154749 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $64.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 154750 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 154751 PUBLIC CONTRACTING IN CALIF. $395.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154752 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $2.071.10 FENCING INSTALLATION 154753 OUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $1.350.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 164764 R$R INSTRUMENTS $397.98 ELECTRIC PARTS 154755 REALTIME SYSTEMS CDR $3,360AG INTEGRATION SERVICES 154756 BOLT DELIVERY $252.40 FREIGHT 154757 REMEDYTEMP $1,574.52 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 154758 BANDON ENGINEERING,INC. $2.150.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 154759 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $1.439.77 PUMP PARTS 154760 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $75,495.01 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 154761 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $357.92 SPECIALTY GASES 154762 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $217.00 LAB REPAIRS 154763 SERPENTIX CONVEYOR CORP $3,270.87 MECHANICAL PARTS 154764 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $481.09 TOOLS 154765 SHASTA ELECTRIC $34.148.00 CONSTRUCTION J-31-2 154765 SHURELUCK SALES $5,108.80 TOOLSIHARDWARE 154767 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $27.500.50 PERMIT FEES 154760 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 LAB SUPPLIES 154769 SO.CAL GAS.OO. $22.820.53 NATURAL GAS 154770 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $880.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 154771 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $11.001.46 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 154772 SUMMIT STEEL $243.72 METAL 154773 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $721.93 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 154774 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $789,385.51 CONSTRUCTION P2-35.3,PI-38-5,P2-46,P2-55 154775 SWRCB/AFRS $10.000.00 WASTE DISCHARGE FEES 154776 SYMCAS $5,17T50 CONSULTING SERVICES 154777 TCH ASSOCIATES $964.56 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0927/95 PAGER REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/02/96 POSTING DATE 10102MG WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154770 TRW SPACE&ELECTRONICS GROUP $372.00 THERMOMETERS 154779 TEKMAR-DOHRMANN $37.61 LAB SUPPLIES 154780 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $4.848.78 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM 154701 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,239.53 MECHANICAL PARTS 154782 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS SM.78 CABLE SERVICES 154783 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $244.35 LOCKS&KEYS 164784 EDWARD M.TORRES 5250.00 EXPENSE REIMS. 154785 TRANSCAT $2,074.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154786 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,722.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5-11-94 154787 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $25.81 TRUCK PARTS 154788 TRUESDAIL LASS $3.078.90 LAB SERVICES 154799 USC-TRG $295.00 REGISTRATION 154790 ULTRASCIENTIFIC $157.00 LAB SUPPLIES 154791 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $1.270.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154792 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $761.91 PARCEL SERVICES 164793 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2.500.23 LAB SUPPLIES 154794 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $532.44 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154795 VARIAN CHROMATOGRAPHY SYS $315.66 LAB SUPPLIES 154796 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1.657.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 154797 VISION ENVIRO SERVICES INC $3,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE J-11-1-A 154798 WATERS CORPORATION $69.23 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154799 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17.982.43 CAUSTIC SODA NO B-23-95 15480D WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 58,621.23 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE NO 424/W 154801 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $886.09 MURIATIC ACID 154802 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. 52,738.79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 154803 NANCY WHEATLEY $1.236.03 EXPENSE REIMB. 154804 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN&SMART $83.542.76 LEGAL SERVICES MO 7-2&95 154805 WOODWARD GOVERNOR CO 54,999.77 FIELD INVESTIGATION J-33.1 15480E WORDPERFECT $27.97 SUBSCRIPTION 154807 WYATT DATA SERVICES $770.00 PUBLICATION 154808 XEROX CORP. $12,802.69 COPIER LEASES 154809 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $188.40 LAB SUPPLIES 154810 ZENON ENVIRONMENTAL INC $9.000.00 DEMONSTRATION EQUIPMENT 154811 ZYMARK CORP. $80.43 LAB EQUIPMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10N2198 34.121.504.65 6' � FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09127M PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IGM21M POSTING DATE 10/02/96 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $105.00 92 OPER FUND $2.343.81 #2 CAP FAC FUND $8.804.28 #3 OPER FUND $16,378.87 #3 CAP FAC FUND $11,220.02 #5 OPER FUND $1,163.12 #6 OPER FUND $45.00 #7 OPER FUND $5.365.76 #7 CAP FAC FUND $226,684.17 #11 OPER FUND $2,434.22 #14 OPER FUND $82.01 #586 OPER FUND $111.48 #586 CAP FAC FUND $844.00 #887 OPER FUND $213.74 #7&14 OPER FUND $15.78 JT OPER FUND $783.41C37 CORP $2.303.031.20 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $103.717.29 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $655.530.53 - $4,121,504.65 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 10/16/96 PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10116M POSTING DATE 10/16M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154867 ARKTECHNOLOGIES $3.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154858 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,521.27 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154889 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $17.88 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 164870 AWSI $235.04 MEDICAL TESTING 154871 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $267.31 HARDWARE 154872 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $998.51 DOOR REPAIRS 154873 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $981.82 SPECIALTY GASSES 154874 ALADDIN HOUSE $925.80 WINDOW BLINDS 154875 ALCO PRODUCTS INC $181.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154B76 AMER SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGR $55.00 PUBLICATION 154877 AMERIDATA $5,050.24 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 154876 AMERICAN SIGMA $509.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 154879 AMSCO SCIENTIFIC $226.14 LAB SUPPLIES 154880 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $103.48 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 154881 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $215.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154882 AQUATIC BI SSAY&CONSULT $235.00 LAB SERVICES 154883 NICHOLAS ARHONTES $265.91 EXPENSE REIMB. 154884 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $9,278.72 WASTE REMOVAL 154885 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $380.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 154806 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS 1290.93 BUILDING MATERIALS 154887 AMSA $825.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 154888 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 54,080.18 PAYROLL SERVICES 154889 AWARDS&TROPHIES 830.17 PLAGUES 154890 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $416.66 ROPE 154891 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $47.40 WASTE DISPOSAL 164892 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $270.00 LAB ANALYSIS 154893 BARNEBY-SUTCLIFFE CORP. $16.511.11 FILTER MEDIA 154894 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1.801.40 BATTERIES 154895 BEACH PAVING INC. $950.00 PAVING SERVICES 154896 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $34.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 154897 WT BILLARD $319.71 BUILDING REPAIRS 164898 BOOTBARN $182.98 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 154899 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $7.100.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES 154900 BRANDALL MODULAR CORP $81,460.00 INFO TECH TRAILER MO 4-24-95 154901 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $241.50 INSTRUMENT 154902 STEVE BURRILL $150.10 EXPENSE REIMB. 1549D3 BUSINESS ENTER.TRAINING SOLUTIONS $5,195.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154904 CEM CORPORATION $387.95 LAB SUPPLIES 154905 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $720.00 GASANALYSIS 154906 C.P.I. $1,567.22 LAB SUPPLIES 154907 CS COMPANY 52,261.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154908 CALTROL,INC. $648.38 HARDWARE 154909 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $178.09 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154910 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $619.50 MOVING SERVICES 154911 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $149,001.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 3.27-96,5-24-95,4-14-93 154912 DEON CARRICO $210.99 EXPENSE REIMB. FUNDNO 0199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 10/16M PAGE2 , REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10H6M POSTING DATE 10/16M WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154913 CATAPULTING. $2,720.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 164914 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $3.777.68 OFFICE FURNITURE 154915 CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 154916 GEORGE CHARETTE $190.95 EXPENSE REIMB. 164917 CHEMWEST INC $8.022.61 PUMP PARTS 154910 CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANTS $189.96 TRAINING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 154919 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $11.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154920 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $24.52 LAB SUPPLIES 164921 COUCH 8 SONS $11.020.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17.1 154922 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $31.205.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I0-25-95 154923 COMPUSERVE $310.05 COMPUTER SERVICES 154924 CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS $106.80 DOCUMENT DISPOSAL SERVICE 164025 CONNELL GM PARTS/DIV. 525.59 TRUCK PARTS 154926 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3.713.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 154927 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $2.783.51 PRINTING SERVICES 154926 CONSUMER PIPE $151.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154929 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $19.051.15 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93 154930 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $6,733.12 ENGINE PARTS 154931 COPELCO CAPITAL OR)IMAGE PLUS $1,432.00 COPIER LEASE 154932 CORPORATEEXPRESS $779.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 164933 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 3225.42 TRUCK PARTS 154934 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.055.24 ELECTRIC PARTS 154935 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $59.61 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154936 CAL STATE UNIV FULLERTON $1,185.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154937 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $208.32 UNDERGROUND PETROLEUM STORAGE FEE 154938 J.W.DANGELO CO,INC. $509.33 VALVES 154939 JAMES DARLINGTON $412.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154940 ALBERT W DAMES INC $100,673.81 CONSTRUCTION 338R 154941 DE GUELLE 8 SONS GLASS CO $255.72 SAFETY GLASS 154942 DELL MARKETING L.P. $20.192.52 DESKTOP COMPUTERS 164943 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $760.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 154944 DELTA DENTAL PUN OF CALIF. $14.496.69 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94 154945 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $1,549.23 VALVES 154US CARD DILLON $216.39 EXPENSE REIMB. 154947 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 154948 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $192.23 PAINT SUPPLIES 154949 ESP NORTH $212.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154950 J.D.EDWARDS $31.308.00 SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7.24-96 154951 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $170.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154952 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $8,140.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 154953 ENCHANTER,INC. $4.200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 154954 DARRELL ENNIS $153.75 EXPENSE REIMB. 154955 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,872.00 LAB SERVICES 154955 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS DEVELOP $3.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154957 FASION FAIR CLEANERS $44.08 PERMIT CANCELLATION REFUND 154958 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $315.15 AIR FREIGHT FUND NO 91N - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10116/96 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/16/96 POSTING DATE 10/16M WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154959 FIRST CHOICE $354.98 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 154960 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. $2,052.63 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 154961 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $996.24 LAB SUPPLIES 154962 TIM FOLEY $204.51 EXPENSE REIMB. 154963 FORNACIARI CO $138.59 FILTERS 154964 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $136.81 PHOTO SUPPLIES 154965 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,357.83 PAINT SUPPLIES 154966 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $921.67 ELECTRONIC S COMPUTER SUPPLIES 154987 CITY OF FULLERTON $298.39 WATER USE 154968 FURON CO. $426.39 CABLE 154969 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,490.18 CHEMICALS 154970 THE GARTNER GROUP $425.61 SUBSCRIPTION 154971 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $319.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 154972 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,123.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES 154973 THE GRAMMAR GROUP $1,500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154974 GRASBY S.T.I. $2,314.11 ENGINE PARTS 154975 GRAYBAR $1,941.97 TOOLS 154976 GREATAMERICAN PRINTING $691.53 PRINTING 154977 HB TYPE B GRAPHICS $4.442.07 PRINTING 164978 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,328.35 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154979 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2.010.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 154980 PL HAWN CO,INC. $1,082.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 164981 MICHELLE HETHERINGTON $244.60 EXPENSE REIMB. 154982 HOME DEPOT $26.78 SMALL HARDWARE 154983 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,132.07 PAINTSUPPLIES 164984 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,778.86 WATER USE 154985 HYDROTEX INC $1,532.15 AUTO SUPPLIES 154988 IPCO SAFETY $4,047.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154987 ISCO,INC. $4,633.25 INSTRUMENT 154988 INFORMATION RESOURCES $375.00 PERSONNEL SERVICES 154989 INSTITUTE B LAW $2,575.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 154990 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $747.14 BATTERIES 154991 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 154992 JAMISON ENGINEERING $1,783.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 154993 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $351.18 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154994 JAYS CATERING $979.93 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 154995 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $666.35 ELECTRIC PARTS 154996 MARK KAWAMOTO $229.35 EXPENSE REIMB. 164997 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $103.913.40 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 164998 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $1,426.80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.O.11-1595 154999 KING BEARING,INC. $531.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES 155000 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $438.24 TOOLS 155001 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,135.22 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 155002 LACA13A $185.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING REGISTRATION 155003 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $6,056.03 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DISPOSAL 155004 LAW/CRANDAL.INC. $278.37 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 10116M6 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10113198 POSTING DATE 10116M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 155005 LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL $2,990.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 155008 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $12.334.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES 155007 LEWCO ELECTRIC $284.70 TRUCK PARTS 165008 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $1.686.38 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90 155009 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO,INC. $387.90 UNIFORMS 155010 MPS $185.83 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 155011 MACOMCO $2,015.94 SERVICE AGREEMENT 155012 MSA $80.23 SENSOR BOARD REPAIR 155013 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $175.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155014 MIKE MASTERSON $229.75 EXPENSE REIMB. 155015 MIKE MCCARTHY $204.51 EXPENSE REIMB. 155016 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $744.66 EXPENSE REIMB. 155017 MCJUNKIN CORP $3,286.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155018 MESAMUFFLER $335AS AUTO PARTS 155019 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,954.34 UNIFORM RENTALS 155020 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES 54,282.00 AUDITING SERVICES NO 3-8-95 155021 MORTON SALT $688.52 SALT 155022 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $3.222.65 MEMBERSHIP 155023 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $703.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS 155024 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $742.71 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 155025 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $2,779.10 FILTERS 155026 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $165.05 SAFETY GLASSES 155027 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION 1,029.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 155028 OFFICE PAVIUONSIINTERIOR RESOURCES $111.53 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 155029 ORANGE COUNTY WATER ASSOC. $240.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 155030 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $143.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155031 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $554.33 FITTINGS 155032 ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $735.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 155033 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.869.78 SPECIALTY GASES 155034 COUNTY OF ORANGE $870.00 ROLL CHANGE PROCESSING FEE 155035 COUNTY OF ORANGE $101.00 PERMITS 155036 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $821.22 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155037 PACIFIC PARTS $10.985.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS 155038 PACIFIC PROCESS EOUIPMENT,INC. 599.60 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155039 PACIFIC BELL $16.68 TELEPHONE SERVICES 155040 PANENERGY TRADING&MARKET $86,172.09 NATURAL GAS 155041 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $332.95 TIRES 155042 PARTS UNLIMITED $409.94 TRUCK PARTS 155043 PEOPLE SOFT,INC. $33.550.00 BID BOND REFUND 155044 PERMA SEAL $2,955.46 LUBE OIL 155045 PERSONAL STRENGTHS PURL $410.98 TRAINING MATERIALS 155046 ELAN PHARMA 5210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 155047 POLYPURE,INC. $27,942.56 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 155048 POLYSPEDE 3201.45 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 155049 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $523.56 CHEMICALS 155050 PRENTICE HALL $49.62 PUBLICATION FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 10/16SS PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/16096 POSTING DATE 10/1&96 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 155051 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $192.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 155052 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $173.74 PUMP PARTS 155053 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $287.05 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 155054 R S 1 TRAINING,INC 5900.00 TRAINING MATERIALS 155055 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. S2=72 TRASH REMOVAL 155056 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $215.47 LAB SUPPLIES 155057 RANCHO AUTO WASH INC $427.60 TRUCK WASHTICKETS 155058 BOLTDELIVERY $158.85 FREIGHT 155059 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $279.63 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155060 THE REGISTER $1.736.80 NOTICES BADS 155061 REISH MARINE STUDIES.INC. $400.00 OCEAN MONITORING 155062 REMEDYTEMP $21.018.10 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 155063 RUPES-KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $1.051.21 PUMP PARTS 155064 SKC WEST $874.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES 155065 ST.SENA CONVALESCENT CENTER $839.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 155066 SCHERING-PLOUGH $64.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES 155067 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $3,998.10 PUMP PARTS 15508E CITY OF SEAL BEACH $146.10 WATER USE 155069 STUART SEVERN $183.18 EXPENSE REIMB. 155070 SHURELUCK SALES $5,309.30 TOOLS~DWARE 156071 MIKE SILBERMANN COMPANY $3,015.93 SEWER REPAIRS 155072 MELINDA SILVERMAN,PHD $125.00 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING SERVICES 155073 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $464.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 155074 SMITH-EMERYCO. $2.824.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 155075 SMITH PIPE B SUPPLY $169.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155076 SOUTH COAST WATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES 155077 SO CALIF EDISON CO $7,227.36 POWER 155078 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $2,758.18 NATURAL GAS 155079 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $11.669.88 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 155080 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $250.00 METER 155081 STANDARD SUPP 8 EQUIP CO $138.16 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155082 STERLING ART $246.31 ARTSUPPUES 155083 SUMMITSTEEL $1.008.54 METAL 155084 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $538.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 155085 SWRCB/AFRS 5400.00 ANNUAL WASTE DISCHARGE FEE 155086 TARBY OF DELAWARE INC $1,243.00 PUMP PARTS 155087 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $333.97 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 155088 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $61.26 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 155089 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,296.75 MECHANICAL PARTS 155090 TIMEMOTIONTOOLS $12521 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155091 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. 81,000.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 155092 MARKTOMKO $269.19 EXPENSE REIMB. 155093 TRUESDAIL LABS $500.00 LAB SERVICES 155094 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $925.21 INSTRUMENT PARTS 155095 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $31.89 PARCEL SERVICES 155096 VWR SCIENTIFIC $5.900.52 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 0199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 10lM5 PAGES , REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 101116195 POSTING DATE 10116MB WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 155097 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3.907.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155098 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $1,762.87 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155099 TEDVITKO $216.39 EXPENSE REIMB. 15510D WACKENHUT CORP. $13.392.62 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 155101 GUY L WARDEN 8 SONS $165.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155102 K.H.WATTS CO $90.48 FILTERS 155103 WESTERN FEDERAL INC $679.32 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1551D4 WESTERN METRO UNIT $523.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155105 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $15,127.11 CAUSTIC SODA MO B-23-95 155106 WESTERN TAP MANUFACTURING $163.34 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155107 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $875.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 155108 WESCO $1,093.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155109 JUDITH A.WILSON $79.44 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 155110 JAMES WYBENGA $196.95 EXPENSE REIMB.. 155111 XEROX CORP. $128.50 COPIER LEASES 155112 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $230.30 LAB SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 101IMS §1,071,487.37 SUMMARY AMOUNT #I OPER FUND $386.70 fit OPER FUND $1.402.99 fi3 OPER FUND $9,125.26 fi3 CAP FAC FUND $128,355.52 95 OPER FUND $221.23 96 OPER FUND $163.80 fi7 OPER FUND $3.560.85 fill OPER FUND $7,394.31 *11 CAP FAC FUND $11,101.97 #13 OPER FUND $39.30 JT OPER FUND $431,629.89 CORF $298,210.03 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $14,496.69 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $165,398.83 §1,071,487.37 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE -VARIOUS PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 10I10196 154866 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $1,032.36 PETTY CASH REIMB, 10H0616 155113 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN B SMART $45,000.00 LEGAL SERVICES 1028616 155396 ANDY C.PATTERSON,ADMNSTR OF $10.000.00 REPLACEMENT WARRANT 1029196 155397 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,529.70 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON 1029/96 155398 CWEA $650.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1029/96 155399 LORI COLAMONICO .$631.00 DEDUCTION WARRANT REPLACEMENT 1029/96 155400 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN B SMART $28,614.21 LEGAL SERVICES 10/31196 155401 AMSA $275.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 10511196 156402 EDWARD M.TORRES $250.00 CASH ADVANCE 11/07/96 155637 INGRID HELLEBRAND $151.58 EXPENSE REIMB. 11/07/96 155638 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $963.56 PETTY CASH REIMB. 11/07/96 155639 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN 8 SMART $104,969.11 LEGAL SERVICES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $198,256.62 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT OPER FUND $179,773.72 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $10,000.00 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $6,482.80 $196.266.52 AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL :�� sir• fir �, � -e.. , r iT MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Indlale or OdglnatoQ OMITS: FAHgc � ALL Thomas L.Woodruff EXEC: W STEER: +41. '"�"�3 DMslon No.,No",and E»enslon JT.BDS: 1120/96 y = z ;✓e` AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordina: CLAIM OF J. D. LINCOLN FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY LOSS RE BAYSIDE DRIVE SPILL. Recommended Action(s): 1) Refuse to accept the claim for Personal Property Loss and take no action to approve or deny based on being untimely; 2) Deny the claim for Real Property Loss; and 3) Refer to General Counsel and Claims Administrator. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Dale Notice of Exemption Filed: Negathm Declaration Approved on Na Final EIR Approved en_and Notice of Determination filed on_ BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: COST JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES a.,a•^ea v�usT��•r•�•I Solledula/LIce Item: WE n/a n/a n/a AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Xern: AMPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINALBID,PO, CHANGEORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AR n/a n/a n/a We WILL PROJECTREQUIRE ADDmONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POUCY ACTION? NO YES NOT APPLICABLE If YES,stetenumber Permanent Umeed Tenn If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) To Committee: 1. Signature Date Division Manager(Or Designee) Signature Date To Jt.Bds.: 1. Memorandum from Department Head(Or Designee) General Counsel dated 11/14/96. Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) =to. — ADIIITIONA�LCOMM. =COWM. FAHFR JOINT BOARDSw'— kgewu en .r Su.—rY) General Counsel dated I IM4196. PK:Ig c: Department Head AGM-Administrabon AGM-Operations General Manager JAWPDOMBS�AG96WOV961LINCOLN AIT Page 2 Of 2 R.mn: 82896 AGENDA { &t. DaNMAarroNveM ITEM °''r egs'coNssirr TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT eos.olseussiod � - {NnNCDNsts�F c HrAwNO • T a05 kff`RN o DATE E„iiry ENDATrEMIJO,: MEETING DATE 'i�.5. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initials of Odginator) 71 OMITS: PDC: FAHR: r 2160/Penny Kyle/2026 EXEC: t,.., f`='"�. 2 STEER: i i1' Ell' DMslon No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDs: 1120/96 p AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: ADOPT FINDINGS RE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OF PORTER PLATING COMPANY, INC. AND JERRY PORTER. Recommended Action(s): Adopt Findings and affirm decision re Administrative Appeal of Porter Plating Company, Inc., and Jerry Porter CECAREVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Dale Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Decl®ntlon Approved on 0626/96 Final SIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed!on_ BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ BUDGETAMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES n.Iaudaet W, T—d.iq Sche lule/Une Item: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: n/a n/a n/a n/a Scheduls/Line Item: AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AR n/a n/a n/a n/a WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE If YES,statenumEer—Pennanens Umfted Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) To Committee: 1. Signature Date Division Maf)ager-4Ar Design e) 11� I( 3� Signature > ate To Jt. Bds.: 1. FINDINGS&DECISION of tO/10/96 Depa m At Vie ( e gnee5 Administrative Appeal Sign a a Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) I Ed��t�AA x ks a ADDMONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summery) On October 10, 1996 the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 heard the appeal of Porter Plating Company, Inc. and Jerry Porter of the General Manager's December 15, 1995 administration determination, which imposed civil penalties of$46,000 on Porter Plating as a result of discharge and reporting violations by Porter Plating and Jerry Porter. lg c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager JAWPDOCUMAGNWOV96WORTER.AIT Page 2 of 2 Revision: 8128M6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL ) FINDINGS AND DECISION OF ) HEARING PORTER PLATING COMPANY, INC., ) DATE: October 10, 1996 AND JERRY PORTER ) TIME: 6:05 p.m. PLACE: 10844 Ellis Avenue 1 Fountain Valley, CA On October 10, 1996, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, heard the appeal of Porter Plating Company, Inc. ("Porter Plating") and Jerry Porter of the General Manager's December 15, 1995 administrative determination, which imposed civil penalties of $46,000 on Porter Plating as a result of discharge and reporting violations by Porter Plating and Jerry Porter. Having received evidence and considered the record of proceedings from the October 18, 1995 hearing before Hearing Officer Nancy J. Wheatley (Volumes 1 and 2), together with a report, dated October 2, 1996, submitted on behalf of the Source Control Division, the provisions of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations ("District's Ordinance"), and the presentations, information, and argument offered to the Board of Directors at the October 10, 1996 hearing, the Board of Directors hereby finds that the following matters are established by a preponderance of the evidence. o 710.01 m 1. Section 615.D.7 of the District's Ordinance provides that the District may impose civil penalties for the violation of waste discharge limitations, the failure to submit self-monitoring reports, and the failure to submit required waste management proposals. Government Code section 54740.5 authorizes the District to administratively impose civil penalties for violating discharge or reporting requirements after notice and a hearing held in accordance with that section. The amount of such penalties are limited per violation by statute, and are reasonably designed to induce compliance with the District's Pretreatment Program. Such civil penalties are not the equivalent of treble or punitive damages. 2. On eight occasions between March 29 and December 8, 1994, Porter Plating's wastewater discharge contained levels of chromium in excess of the concentration limits established in Porter Plating's Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit ("Discharge Permit") and the District's Ordinance. Each of these violations are shown on Attachment 1 to these findings. 3. On ten occasions during the same period, Porter Plating's wastewater discharge contained levels of nickel in excess of the concentration limits in the Discharge Permit and the District's Ordinance. (Vol. 2, Tab 7, District's Opening Brief, Exhibit "J".) Each of these violations are shown on Attachment 2 to these findings. 2 o 710.01 ,V 4. Porter Plating failed to submit to the District four required self-monitoring reports for heavy metals discharges (due April 14 1994, July 14, 1994, October 13, 1994, and January 23, 1995) and two required self- monitoring reports for cyanide discharges (due July 14, 1994 and January 23, 1995). (Vol. 1, Tab 4, District's Exhibits "A" and "B"; Vol. 2, Tab 6, Reporter's Transcript ("RT"), 45:14-46:3.) 5. Porter Plating further failed to submit a Wastewater Management Proposal, due November 4, 1994, as required by the terms of the Probation Order issued on August 17, 1994. (Vol. 1, Tab 4, Exhibit "E"; Vol. 2, Tab 6, RT, 46:4-8.) 6. These actions by Porter Plating and Jerry Porter are violations of the District's Pretreatment Program, the District's Ordinance, and the terms of the Discharge Permit which the District issued to Porter Plating. (Vol. 1, Tab 4, Exhibit "B".) 7. Through their appeal from the General Manager's December 15, 1995 determination, Potter Plating and Jerry Porter have presented this matter to the Board of Directors for independent review and determination. (Vol. 1, Tab 2.) Pursuant to this appeal, the Board of Directors has the discretion to make anew all determinations relating to liability of Porter Plating and Jerry Porter for violation of District regulatory requirements and for civil penalties. 8. On more than one occasion following the issuance of the administrative complaint in this matter, Porter Plating and Jerry Porter were informed that relevant, non-privileged District records were available for their 3 ao 710.01 v review and copying, but did not seek to review these documents. (Vol. 2, Tab 8.) 9. Porter Plating and Jerry Porter did not pursue a deposition of the custodian of records of District tiles. 10. At no time during these proceedings, either before the October 18, 1995 hearing or since the filing of their Notice of Appeal, have Porter Plating and Jerry Porter filed a motion to compel discovery either with the General Manager or the Board of Directors. Having failed to file such a motion, Porter Plating and Jerry Porter have waived any claim that they were entitled to additional discovery in these proceedings. 11. On March 13, 1994, the District provided notice to Porter Plating and Jerry Porter of the alleged violations and of the right to a hearing (Tabs 3-5). Porter Plating and Jerry Porter had the opportunity to present a defense to all allegations and to cross-examine District representatives at the October 18, 1995 hearing. (Vol. 2, Tab 6.) 12. Collection of wastewater samples and wastewater analysis of Porter Plating's wastewater discharge were performed pursuant to long established EPA methods of sampling and analysis; EPA approval of these methods constitutes acceptance by the relevant scientific community and confirms their reliability. (Vol. 2, RT, 66:25-67:12; 97:25-99:22; 107:4- 108:19; 111:13-112:8; 115:23-118:2.) 13. The District accepted the design of a pretreatment system submitted by Porter Plating and Jerry Porter. The District did not design Porter 4 0044710.01 Plating's pretreatment system. (Reporter's Transcript of Proceedings, October 10, 1996 "RTP," 43.) 14. The District did not raise the concentration limits in the Discharge Permit after the installation of Porter Plating's pretreatment system. (RTP 44.) 15. The Discharge Permit specifies the methods to be used for sampling and analysis of Porter Plating's wastewater discharge. The sampling and analysis was performed in accordance with the methods prescribed in the Discharge Permit. Prior to these proceedings, Porter Plating and Jerry Porter never objected to the sampling and analysis methods prescribed in the Discharge Permit. (Vol. 1, Tab 4, Exhibit "B".) 16. The District's Pretreatment Program is essential to the District's ability to beneficially reuse the bio-solids produced during the wastewater treatment process. (Vol. 2, Tab 6, RT, 82:8-83:24.) 17. Jerry Porter had knowledge of the continuing discharge problems at Porter Plating and was in a position to control the quality of the wastewater discharged from Porter Plating. (RTP 69) Jerry Porter failed to take adequate steps to remain in compliance with the District's discharge and other regulatory requirements. (Vol. 2,Tab 6, RT, 28:12-16; 34:11-35:4; 41:5-19;68:22-69:15;144:17-19;145:22-146:6;147:4-6; 147:13-148:23.) 18. During the time the discharge and reporting violations occurred, Jerry Porter was the owner of the real property occupied by Porter Plating as well as the President of Porter Plating. (RTP 24, 33.) 5 o 710M f Based upon the recurring discharge violations during March-December 1994, the failure to take corrective action to eliminate the discharge violations, and the refusal to submit self-monitoring reports and the Waste Management Proposal, the Board of Directors determines that civil penalties in the sum of$46,000.00 should be imposed jointly and severally on Porter Plating and Jerry Porter, individually. 6 a 710.oi Feted SmIfte Gnly _ AGENDA 17=:COMMA INFO..nEN _ ITEM O ".COAOJ.ACTIONITM . . 0r"Jr sG&G018E/fr TRANSMITTAL p JT.SOL MEETING GATE Jr.a05.AGH frBANo. MEETING DATE "d011111.to.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION RJR (InCleh of Originator) OMTS: ''r--':'OMB PDC: FAHR FAAHHR Div. 3720, Joe Rycraw, ExL5057 EXEC EXEC.- 2 STEER: J SD,S: 11120196 STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: RESOLUTION ORDERING ANNEXATION NO. 75- BOWLER ANNEXATION: The Director of Engineering requests approval of an annexation to the District consisting of 0.57 acres of territory in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim (Annexation No. 75- Bowler Annexation). Recommended Action(s): Adopt resolution ordering Annexation No. 75 (Bowler Annexation). CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Dale Notice of Exemption Filed: ar26r96 July 24, 1996 FUNDS BUDGETED: Total: N/A CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR-TO- YEAR-TO-DATE TOTAL REVISED SOURCE:WA BUDGET AMOUNT DATE E%PENDRURES BUDGET PROJECT COST Schadulaf-ine Item:WA BALANCE AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: N/A N/A N/A Scheduleiline Item: I N/A WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO CONSIST ENT WITH BOARD POLICY? YES I/YES.atm number _Permanent Limited Term CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) Ie�Le�4G a ure Data D. . ion M na r( D ignee) / To Commixes: t WA Sign 1 Date De e a ,(O es It O To JL Bds.: 1. 1 Signature Date Assistant Gernmil Manager(Or Designee) J:WPDOCNGENDAWTS%WONANNEx.75 OMTS Comm. PDC COMM, FAHRCOMM. . JOINT.BOARDS, Meednp'Dale: APPmvetlC. :. -Amended: Foiun ided to: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Backgmund andfor Summary) June 24, 1996 the District received a request from William and Patricia Bowler, occupants of a single-family residence located at 370 South Mohler Drive, to annex their 0.57 acre parcel into District 2. The Bowlers had experienced serious problems with their septic system. The annexation is in accordance with the term of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties under which the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. This includes the District Annexation Acreage Fee ($4,008), the recovery of cost for Local Agency Formation Commission Processing Fee ($950), State Board of Equalization Processing Fee ($250), District Processing Fee ($500), and California Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee ($38). The total annexation fee is $5,746.00. The local sewering agency is the City of Anaheim. RJR:jmf J:\WP000VIGENDAWITS-96WO\ ANNEX.75 c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:%WPDOCNGENDAWITS-96WOVWNNEX.75 Page 2 of 2 Fo,EJ.sec.U.ON AGENDA -0 CIX.N INFO.REM ❑ CDNMAD N EM ITEM R'JT.Bus,CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ Ji.EDS,DISCUSSION pANCONSENTJ ❑ PUBUO HEARING. x9D JT.SO&MEETING DATE .L; JI BDS,AGENDA ITEM NO, MEETING DATE COMM,ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Ind*%of Originator) OMTS: OMTS Poc: POC FAHR: FAHR 2 3720,John Dettle,5069 EXEC: EXEC' STEER: STEER Dmsion No-Name,and Exlension JT.BDS:11/20/96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordina: THIRD MODIFICATION OF SEWER EASEMENT WITH UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT 2: The Director of Engineering requests approval for the third modification to the easement for the Fullerton-Brea Purchase Sewer and the Fullerton-Brea Intercepter Sewer, Contract No. 2-25 relocating a portion of the easement around the portion of the trunk sewers found to be outside of the existing easement in the Coyote Hills Golf Course in Fullerton. Recommended Aclion(s): Authorize execution of the Third Modification of Sewer Easement provided by Union Oil Company of California for the relocation of a portion of the original easement around a portion of the Fullerton-Brea Purchase Sewer and the Fullerton-Brea Intercepter Sewer, Contract No. 2-25 found not to be within the existing easement. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination filed w BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $0 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: EXPENDITURES Ru�iewva p..I+^+�•+i $0 $0 $0 $0 AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT $0.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,stale numloer. Permanent Dmaed Term II YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION sedan CONCURRENC S: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) f� ?JO 16 To Committee: 1. Signatur Date Divisio Man r esigne /0-3616 Signatur Date To Jt.Bds.: Depara Be (Or De n e) / b /fib Stgniture ate Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) V a r'I r ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background andfor Summary) The original easement was granted to the City of Fullerton by Union Oil Company on July 27, 1954 for the Fullerton-Brea Sewer. Ownership of the easement was transferred to County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County with the purchase of the Fullerton-Brea Sewer. On March 10, 1988 the first Modification of Sewer Easement was recorded which widened the easement by 15-feet for the parallel construction of the Fullerton-Brea Intercepter Sewer, Contract No. 2-25. The Second Modification of Sewer Easement was granted by Union Oil Company and recorded on November 16, 1995 to grant District No. 2 maintenance crews additional access rights within the proposed golf course. During the preparation of the tract map for the Coyote Hills Golf Course, the Union Oil Company's civil engineering fine discovered that the alignment of the original easement and trunk sewer were not parallel and portions of the Fullerton-Brea Intercepter Sewer were outside of the easement. Union Oil Company agreed to the Third Modification of Sewer Easement to realign the portion of the easement where the sewers are outside the easement. This modified easement will now be centered over the existing sewer alignments. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:1W POOCIDETTLEICS02.AIT Page 2 of 2 Revision: e2a96 For M.Sec Use Crow AGENDA ❑ COMM.INI'U:ITEM - ITEM a ❑ COMM.ACTIONREM G�Jr.MS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ JT.MS.DISCUSSION p o (NON-CONSENT) 3 PU�BBUUCrr HEARING /Ti�r01JIT.MS.MEETING DATE' ��. /3�- Ir.BDs.AGENoA r1EM NO. MEETING DATE :^.COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION C(InlUals of Originator) OMITS: 1,y OMTS PDC: PDC FAHR: + FAHR 3& 11 3720, Chuck Winsor, Extension 5052 EXEC: GE)(EC STEER: `-STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: 11/20/96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda a WQrdina: CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE ORDER 62459 DATED JUNE 10, 1993, WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY : The Director of Engineering, in conjunction with the Director of Finance requests the approval of Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order 62459, re: Relocation of Gas Mains to accommodate construction of Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1, increasing the Purchase Order Amount by $35,500.00, for a total amount not to exceed $99,500.00. Recommended Action(s): Authorize the Director of Finance to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order 62459, increasing the amount by $35,500.00 for a total amount not to exceed $99,500.00. CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Final EIR Approved on July 19.1989 Notice of Determination filed on July 20,1989 February 10, 1993 BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED ART.: $8,059,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES Oauieuepdnarrenm,sl Schedule/Line FP Dist.3&11:17-v-1 AMOUNT TRANSFER: $785,000 $307,052 $477,948 $477,948 AMOU SchaduatUne Item:N/A AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT $64,000.00 -0- $35,500.00 $99,500.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? YES If YES,state number: _Permanent Limited Term 'REQUIRES explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES' ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) UA t.vr 7 .`+ To Committee: 1. N/A Signal Date Divis' n Man ( r esi, Sign re ! — Da To JL Bds.: Depa e Or esi as) � O 9 p Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM JOINT BOA , Meeting Date: Approved: Amended: Forwarded to: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Background and/or Summary) The following represents a sequence of events involving the Indemnification Agreement and Collectible Work Authorization (agreement) between County Sanitation Districts 3 and 11 (CSD 3 & 11) and the Southern California Gas Company (SCGC)for relocation of an 8-inch and a 2-inch SCGC gas main which otherwise would have interfered with Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1: 1. On 2-10-93, CSD 3& 11 Boards approved Resolution No. 93-17, authorizing the agreement. 2. On 6-10-93, Districts issued Purchase Order No. 62459 to SCGC for a "not to exceed" amount of $64,000.00 based on the work anticipated by SCGC. The agreement, however, did not include a .not to exceed" clause. It was in the standard SCGC agreement format. 3. On 6-16-93, Districts paid a deposit of$61,069.00 which was the initial estimate by SCGC, in accordance with the agreement. 4. On 10-2-95, SCGC sent the Districts Invoice No. 3A-200, in the amount of$38,362.61, for the remainder of the services due under the agreement. 5. In October 1995, Districts staff requested additional backup information for the 10-2-95 invoice. SCGC took another twelve months to produce the final invoice for the same amount, dated 10-3-96. The original purchase order authorized payment to SCGC in an amount not to exceed $64,000.00. The latest SCGC invoice is for a total amount of$99,431.61, less the amount of the initial deposit of$61,069.00 for a balance due of$38.362.61. Staff recommends that the Director of Finance be authorized to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order 62459, increasing the amount by$35,500.00, for a total amount not to exceed $99,500.00 and that the Finance Director be authorized to make the final payment of$38,362.61 per the latest invoice. CFW:jmf c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:\WPDOCNGENDAWITS-96WOV1.96-04 Page 2 of 2 Fa Bd.Sew G aDaN AGENDA ❑ co".INFO.ITEM ITEM n ❑.. CONIM.ACTIONITEM OJT,so&CONSENT TRANSMITTAL ❑ : JT.SOB:DISCUSSION I(NON-CONSENT) 17-'PUBLIC NEARING JT.BOS.MEETING DATE Jr.BOB.AGENDA'pEM NO. P MEETING DATE 'COMM.ID.NO. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION QVIL(lnhials of Originator) OMTS: OMTS PDC: >'PDC FAHR: -FAHR 5 3720, Chuck Winsor, Extension 5052 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension Jr.BDS: 11/20/96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONISI: Agenda Wording: QUITCLAIM EASEMENT ON LAND CONTAINING PORTIONS OF THE FORMER CORONA DEL MAR PUMP STATION: The Director of Engineering requests quitclaiming an existing easement, as described on Exhibit A to Quitclaim Deed, to new owner of land, Auto Spa of Corona Del Mar, Inc. Recommended Action(s): 1. Approve the Quitclaim Deed as submitted. 2. Authorize the General Manager to execute the Quitclaim Deed. CEOA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE(Not a Project) DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: February 8, 1961 BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: N/A BUDGET AMOUNT T043ATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: WA EXPENDITURES Rameueye0un Tv,E.n) Schedule/Line Item:N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Item:WA AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT N/A N/A N/A WA WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,state number. _Permanent Limited Tenn If VES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: /O� ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA (List) U )��Z�I ' To Committee: 1. N/A Signa a Date Divi n Ma ager D sign �p Signal r Date To A. Bds.: Departm t d Or si ne ) o ;c $o Si azure Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date: Approved: Amended: Forwarded to: CW:jmf J WJPDOCAGENDAAITS-96NOW6-05 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(eaagiound and/or Summary) On February 6, 1961, the Board of Directors approved Resolution No. 919-5, authorizing acquisition of an easement for the Corona Del Mar Pump Station site. The pump station was subsequently built and used for more than 30 years until 1992 when the District completed the connection to the new 24-inch diameter sewer line in Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) which was built under Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3. The new sewer line involved a tunnel under a portion of PCH to route the flow without having to use the former pump station. The Corona Del Mar Pump Station was then abandoned by removing all the mechanical and electrical equipment, removing the top four feet of the structure including a reinforced concrete slab, and filling the remaining portions of the structure with sand so that no settlement would occur in the future. During recent months, the adjacent property was acquired by a new owner, Auto Spa of Corona Del Mar, Inc. The Corona Del Mar Pump Station is constructed partially within an alleyway owned by the City of Newport Beach. The City will not complete the relinquishment of that property to the new adjacent property owner until the District completes the quitclaim process for relinquishing the existing sewer easement which encumbers the site. Staff recommends that the Directors authorize the General Manager to execute the Quitclaim Deed in a form acceptable to General Counsel. CWJmf JAWPDOCAGENDAWTS-91 WOA96-05 c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:\WPDOCAGENDAWTS-96\NOA96-05 Page 2 of 2 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE Wednesday, October 23, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, October 23, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Members Present: Staff Present: John Collins, Joint Chair Don McIntyre, General Manager Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Blake Anderson, Chief Operations Officer George Brown, Chair, FAHR Committee Judy Wilson, Chief Administrative Officer Pal McGuigan, Chair, OMTS Committee Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources John Cox, Past Joint Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Marc Dubois, Contracts/Purchasing Manager Absent: Lynda Heller, Purchasing Secretary Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Sheldon Singer, Chair, PDC Committee Roger Stanton, Vice Chair, FAHR Committee Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Others Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel John Gullixson, Dist. 13 Chair Jim Broder, CMS Jim Coleman, CMS APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 October 23, 1996 RECEIVE, FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION: Receive, file and approve draft minutes of the September 25, 1996 Steering Committee meeting. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair asked Nancy Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, to update the members on the status of the SAWPA agreement. A meeting has been scheduled for October 25 with the Chair and Vice Chair of the Eastern Municipal Water District and the President of Chino Basin Municipal Water Basin to try to reach consensus regarding the continuing guarantee agreement that Chino Basin has to now refused to sign. Chair Collins indicated that if the SAWPA members cannot reach agreement on this issue, the Districts would be forced to return to the terms of the existing agreement. A report will be made on this issue at the November 20, 1996 Steering Committee meeting. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager did not make a report. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-3) 1. PROPOSED CHANGES TO PURCHASING RESOLUTION. The Purchasing Manager presented proposed changes to the purchasing resolution that will streamline the purchasing process, reduce expenditures, and provide for increased staff efficiencies through revisions to the review and approval process and flexibility in standard purchase awards, Recommended Action: Information item only. RECOMMENDATION: The Steering Committee recommended that the revised purchasing resolution be presented to the FAHR Committee in November for detailed review. 2. LAFCO ACTIONS RE CONSOLIDATION. The Chief Administrative Officer discussed recent activities of LAFCO's staff regarding consolidation of the Districts and discussion of this item at the next LAFCO Board meeting. Recommended Action: Seek direction from the Steering Committee. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 October 23, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: It was agreed that Chair Collins would attend the next LAFCO Board Meeting on November 6 and discuss the position of the Districts, the status of consolidation and anticipated schedule if the Districts decides to proceed with consolidation. Because of the change in membership on the Districts' Boards of Directors in January, the issue has been tabled until the new members can be educated on the issues. LAFCO staff has indicated that, if requested, they would be willing to assist with special legislation. 3. AGENDA ITEMS SCHEDULED TO BE PRESENTED TO COMMITTEES IN NOVEMBER. The list of items scheduled to be reviewed by the working committees will be reviewed. Recommended Action: Information item only. CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in closed session at 6:35 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. There were no actions taken. The Committee reconvened in regular session at 7:29 p.m. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for November 20, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. bmitted by. 'n Tappan, Steerifigmmittee Secretary owsmtoMrnaencnoranesacr ° County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 6. 1996 - 530 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on November 6, 1996, at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present: Staff Presem: Pat McGuigan, Chair Blake P.Anderson, Chief Operations Officer John Collins, Joint Chair Bob Ooten, Director of OperationsBMaintenance Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Mark Esquer, Eng Supv, O&M Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance Barry Denes Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Norman Z. Eckenrode Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services Chris Norby Mike Moore, ECM Manager James M. Ferryman Jeff Brown, Project Specialist, O&M Mark Murphy Layne Baroldi, Reg Spec., ECM Division Sal Sapien Angela Holden, Committee Secretary Others Present: Representatives from: Pima Gro Systems, Inc. Bio-Source Tule Ranch John Carollo Engineers APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments by any member of the public. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee e Page 2 November 6, 1996 APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the October 2, 1996 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair McGuigan yielded the floor to Director John Collins. Director Collins had two items: SAWPA- Director Collins and staff met with SAWPA regarding an agreement to sign the contract. SAWPA and staff came to an agreement and after checking with Attorney Woodruff, it appears that we will have a signed contract very soon. LAFCO- LAFCO had on its agenda to force consolidation. This was removed from the agenda and we will proceed with our own consolidation effort. LAFCO has offered to help us with our effort if we wish to introduce new legislation. Since Directors Vic Leipzig and Sal Sapien are leaving the Committee, Chair McGuigan thanked them for their contributions to the Committee. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager did not make a report. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER The Chief Operations Officer, Blake P. Anderson, reported on the status of the Investigation. The investigation is in the disciplinary phase which is in four levels - people terminated, suspended, reprimanded and returned with no action. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Robert J. Ooten, Director of O&M Department, had two items: Investigation - O&M has lost approximately 6% of staff due to the Investigation. Staff reshuffled schedules, canceled vacations etc. to fill in. Air Quality Management District puts out a plan every three years. We have four items that will impact us that we are monitoring. We have approximately 100 permits now. O&M Monthly Report Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report: An Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Monthly Report for the OMTS Committee is submitted for review. The report focuses on compliance, safety, financial projects and performance measure for O&M and is intended to provide the Committee members O&M information on a timely basis. Minutes of the Operations. Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 V November6, 1996 Recommended Actionrsl: Draft report was reviewed and discussed. Staff was requested to add historical data, graphics, action plans including goals, schedules, team evaluations, resources and milestones; and a glossary of terms with explanation. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, had three items: Lab Surplus Equipment-All bids were from non-profit agencies. The purchase price totaled over $350,000. The total bid came in at$112,000. We will award each item to the highest bidder within the next week or two. Bolsa Chica-State Parks have approval to do emergency repairs only. They have asked us to try to assist them in getting legislative support to do the complete repair. They are hoping for FEMA funds. Water Quality Standards Permit-Staff met with Regional Water Quality Control Board on the status of our Permit. The Regional Water Quality Control Board is in the lead. We are working with several experts to develop alternative solutions for discussion. We do not have a schedule to date. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. STATE OF THE DEPARTMENTS PRESENTATION OF STATE OF THE DEPARTMENTS -TECHNICAL SERVICES. Nancy J. Wheatley, Director of Technical Services, presented a brief overview of the Technical Services Department. Recommended Action: Presentation of State of the Departments for Technical Services was received. DISCUSSION ITEM ( items) 1. OMTS96-024 SPECIFICATION NO. P-157, REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES: Technical Services Department staff provided a report on the proposals for biosolids management received on September 30, 1996. Recommended actions will result in a savings of approximately $120,000 per year. Recommended Action(s): (Changed from mailed-out AIT to:) 1. Authorized staff to negotiate a five-year biosolids management agreement with Tule Ranch/Magan Farms to transport and manage approximately 1,000 wet tons of biosolids per week. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 November 6, 1996 2. Authorized a demonstration project contract with Waste Conversion Industries to transport, manage, and chemically convert approximately 200 wet tons per week of biosolids to a Class "A" material at a cost of $17.00 per wet ton. 3. Amend the contract with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. To reflect lower cost of biosolids management and update the description of the agricultural sites used. 2. OMTS96-025 PRESENTATION OF TRI-AGENCY BENCHMARKING STUDY -WASTEWATER AGENCY MUTUAL EFFICIENCY EFFORT(WAMEE): The Director of Operations and Maintenance presented the objectives, approach, challenges encountered, comparisons between agencies, and actions taken as a result of this study. Recommended Adonis): No recommended action. 3. OMTS96-026 AUTHORIZE SCREENINGS COMPACTOR PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION (All Districts): The Operations and Maintenance Department requested that the project report prepared by staff be received and filed and that staff be authorized to proceed with the purchase and installation of screenings compactor systems for a cost savings of approximately$60,000/year. Recommended Adionfs): 1) Receive and file FSM Screenings Compactor Test Report, and 2) authorized staff to proceed with the purchase, design, and installation of screenings compactor systems at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 at a cost not to exceed the $150,000 budgeted in the FY 1996/97 CORF. 4. OMT96-027 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. TO PROVIDE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICE FOR OPERATING THE DISTRICTS'OXYGEN GENERATION SYSTEM: The Operations and Maintenance Department requests authorization to negotiate a cost reduction and amendment to the original agreement for an estimated savings of over$100,000 per year. Recommended Adion(M: Staff pulled this item until a later date. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 November 6, 1996 OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for January 8, 1996. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Submitted by: ie_, Ango Holden Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary ,wyusia.yeuwnuwvnmem e INFO IrFs�a orE°S =,J-CH- AGENDA CJ`JM y° cormn.ACTICNaal ITEM ❑ JT BCS,CISCJSS TRANSMITTAL -Rr JL a05.DISCUSSDN (HON.cousa Tr ?n cu=_I�c�Aam� da JT.sx n~=Erf;CATE JT.SOS.AGENDA ITEM N0. MEETING DATE COMM.ID.NO DISTRICT No. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION AdOM (Initials of Originator) OMTs: 1116196 CMTS - PDC: PD FAHR: FAHR 3550,Michael D.Moore,3654 EXEC: EXEC All STEER: STEER DMItoon No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: 1120/96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): grtda Wording: SPECIFICATION NO. P-157,BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES:The Technical Services Department request approval of: 1.A Biosolids Management Agreement with Tula Ranch/Magan Farms providing for the transportation and management of approximately 1,000 wet tons of biosolids per week;and, 2.Demonstration Project Agreement with Waste Conversion Industries, Inc.to transport,manage, and chemically Convert approximately 200 wet tons of biosolids per week; and, 3.Amendment No.4 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of Districts' Residual Solids with Pima Gro Systems, Inc.decreasing the cost from$21.92-$28.00 to$20.57-$28.00 per wet ton,depending upon the amount of biosolids transported. Recommended Action(s): 1.Approve an Agreement with Tula Ranch/Magan Farms for a five-year period to be effective December 2, 1996 through December 1,2001,for a cost of$19.85 to$25.00 per wet ton according to the technology utilized (Estimated annual amount of$655.000);and, 2.Approve Demonstration Project Agreement with Waste Conversion Industries,Inc.for a one year period to be effective December 2, 1996 through December 1, 1997,for a Cost of$17.00 per wet ton (Estimated annual amount of$170,000); and, 3.Approve Amendment No.4 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of Districts'Residual Solids with Pima GO, Systems,Inc.decreasing the cost from $21.92-$28.00 to$20.57-$28.00 per wet ton, depending upon the amount of biosolids transported. CEOAREVIEW: Projectis Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Dmiarabon Approved on Fuel EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determiretion tiktl on_ April 26, 1995 BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED All $4,704,000 BUDGET AMOUNT TOMATE BUDGET BALANCE Rona a�TOTAL��+=rsI SOURCE: JO !EXPENDITURES Sctiedule2ine Item:33 $4,704,000 $1,162,397 $3,541,603 $4,704,000 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Sohedulell Item: (Sept.30,1996) AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CNANGEORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PAEV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED Am $4,704,000.00 $0.00 ($600,000.00) $4,104,000.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO It YES,state number: _Permenent LIMW Term I If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section w CONCURR NCES, ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(Ust) To Committee: Signature Date Division Manager(Or Designee) 1 3 96 gnatun Date To A.We.: 1. Supplemental Staff Report Dep I e ad r es' ee r Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) k`{ 3 i QM] '/ �z PDC COMM. FAHR GOMM. JOINT BOARDS F 7-7 77 LB: J:\WPI38 OAROLDINGENDAIBIOSOUD.BRD Revision: d2896 ' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(BacRgmund anNor Summery) At the July OMITS meeting,Technical Services staff presented an informational report on the current status of the Districts' biosolids management contracts.Staff informed the OMTS Committee of their intent to issue a request for proposals(RFP) for biosolids management.The goal of this RFP is to add an additional active biosolids management contractor so that we avoid becoming too dependant upon one or two contractor(s)and lose our reliability.The Districts are presently managing their biosolids by recycling through land application in Kem County and Riverside County,California. Because of the difficulty in managing biosolids and the tenuous nature of reuse alternatives,the 1989 Master Plan was adopted with the policy guidance of using multiple options while striving for 100 per cent recycling. Accordingly the Districts has contracts with four separate firms for biosolids reuse,two of which are currently active and two of which are not active. Some of the information presented at the July OMTS Committee meeting has undergone change. In July,when the informational report was presented to the OMTS Committee,the existing contract with Pima Gro was for$25.95 to$28.00 per wet ton,depending on the number of loads they hauled,with an average cost of$26.74 per wet ton. The existing contract with Bio Gro was for$23.62 to$27.12 per wet ton,depending on the number of loads received, averaging$27.12 per wet ton. The 1995-1996 average cost per wet ton was$27.20,including a third contractor,Ag Tech's fiscal year 1995- 1996 average cost of$29.85 per wet ton. The annual cost for contractor biosolids management for 1995-1996 was$4.9 million. As of July,the projected annual cost for biosolids management for fiscal year 1996-1997 was$4.7 million. This estimate reflects cost savings caused by the redistribution of seven loads per day to Bio Gro in order to take advantage of their$23.62 per wet ton rate. Since July, additional price adjustments for biosolids management occurred. In early August, Pima Gro reduced their price to$21.92 per wet ton for 104 or more loads per week(28 tons per load). On September 30, Bio Gro reduced their price to$20.68 for 12 loads per day and$21.45 for up to 11 loads per day. In the past four months,the projected annual cost for biosolids management for fiscal year 1996-1997 has been reduced from$4.7 million to$4.1 million. ($300,000 is budgeted for grit and screenings disposal on the same line item in the Districts'budget.) In August,the Districts issued an RFP for biosolids management. Eight proposals were received by the September 30, 1996 deadline. During October,Technical Services staff will be reviewing and rating each proposal and inspecting each of the Proposal's biosolids management site. The eight proposals,with a few details of the proposal,are presented in the following table: Proposer Technology/Location Pricing/Wet Ton Revenue Shann USA Transport Land Application/Kem County $23.50 $0.05-$0.25ANT McCarthy Farms Land Application/Kings County $24.50 None Responsible Biosolids Management Land Application/Kem County $22.25 to$25.30 None Waste Conversion Industries Chemical Fixation/Corona, CA $17.00(ramp) None California Soil Products Chemical Fixation/Mecca,CA $25.09 to$25.70 $1.00IVYT or 25°/ Gardner Ranch an Application/Kem County $18.94 None Pima Gro Systems Land Application/Kem County $20.57 to$28.00 50%So1Ms Sold Tule Ranch Land Application/Kem&Kings Co. $19.85 to$25.00 5% Cro Price Staff will evaluate the proposals to see if the Districts have an opportunity to not only increase their reliability and diminish their risk but also to decrease their overall cost of biosolids management by contracting with an additional biosolids management contractor. As of October 14,the deadline for completion of this Agenda Item Transmittal,Technical Services staff has not completed the biosolids management RFP review and site inspections. A report on the biosolids management RFP review will be provided at the November 6 OMTS Committee meeting. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J UP115500AROLDRAGENDMBIOSOLID.BRD Revision: 828196 November 6, 1996 SUPPLEMENTARY STAFF REPORT OMTS96-024 Consideration of motion to recommend to the November Board of Directors to: 1. Authorize staff to negotiate a Five-Year biosolids management agreement with Tule Ranch/Magan Farms to transport and manage approximately 1,000 wet tons of biosolids per week. 2. Authorize a demonstration project contract with Waste Conversion Industries to transport, manage, and chemically convert approximately 200 wet tons per week of biosolids to a Class "A" material at a cost of $17.00 per wet ton. 3. Amend the contract with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. to reflect lower cost of biosolids management and update the description of the agricultural sites used. Summary Recommendation Rational • Tule Ranch earned the highest overall ranking under the Evaluation Criteria. • Reliability and diversity would be best achieved by Tule Ranch/Magan Farms. Their proposal offers four different types of biosolids reuse options in very remote areas of both Kern and Kings Counties. • Tule Ranch/Magan Farms offers a cost that is less than our existing contractors, with their lowest priced option ($19.85). This proposal provides an added incentive of revenue sharing with the Districts in the form of a minimum of 5% of the gross revenues from the sales of crops grown on sites receiving Districts' biosolids. • Pima Gro has provided the Districts with excellent service for the past eight years at a competitive price. • Pima Gro's proposal provides an option of using their proposal as a basis for amending their existing contract. CSOOC 0 P O.Ber 8127 0 Fountain Valle,CA 92728-8127 0 (714) 962-2411 OMTS96-024 Page 2 of 6 November6, 1996 • WCI offers the Districts an opportunity to participate in a Class A biosolids option at a local management site. • WCI's technology may provide a 'turn-key" operation that could be used at the Districts' treatme0t plants in the future. • The WCI proposed demonstration option would increase the Districts' diversity by adding a separate technology for beneficial reuse at a cost of$17.00 per wet ton. Districts' Biosolids Management Backaround The Districts are presently managing their biosolids by recycling through land application in Kern County, and Riverside County, California. Because of the difficulty in managing biosolids and the tenuous nature of reuse alternatives, the 1989 Master Plan was adopted with the policy guidance of using multiple options while striving for 100 percent recycling. Accordingly, the Districts has attempted to maintain contracts with up to four firms for biosolids reuse. The Districts' two current active biosolids management contracts are with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. (Pima Gro) and Wheelabrator Clean Water Systems, Inc. (Bio Gro). The contract with Pima Gro expires on March 31, 2000, and Bio Gro's contract expires on April 30, 2000. The biosolids management contract with Ag Tech Company expired on October 30, 1996, and the contract with Hondo, Inc., which never became active, is in the process of being terminated due to lack of performance. The Districts generate approximately 3,500 wet tons of biosolids per week. This volume of biosolids production requires contractors to beneficially reuse approximately 34 truck loads per day on a four-day-per-week basis. All of the biosolids are recycled by direct land application to agricultural land by Pima Gro and Bio Gro. The average cost for biosolids management in 1995-1996 was $27.20 per wet ton. This cost has already been reduced this year through price concessions by the two active existing contractors. The current biosolids management cost is $21.81 per wet ton. The total quantity biosolids produced by the Districts in 1995-1996 was 184,202 wet tons. The Districts' trend in biosolids production from 1985 through 1995 is provided in Table 2. Consideration of Reallocation of Districts' Biosolids Now Under Contract with Bio Gro and Pima Gro Staff reported at the July 1996 OMTS Committee Meeting that a Request for Proposals (RFP) was to be issued to potential biosolids reuse contractors. On August 30, 1996, the Districts issued a RFP to 92 potential contractors for the management of the OMTS96-024 Page 3 of 6 November 6, 1996 Districts' biosolids. The RFP was issued in anticipation of the approaching contract expiration of Ag Tech Company, the lack of performance of Hondo, Inc., and our desire to support the Districts' goal of multiple biosolids reuse options. Eight contractors responded with proposals. A thorough screening of each proposal was performed and ranked based on selected criteria listed in Table 3. The eight firms that submitted proposals were: • California Soil Products (Chemical Fixation) • Gardner Ranch (Land Application) • McCarthy Family Farms, Inc. (Land Application) • Pima Gro Systems, Inc. (Land Application) • Responsible Biosolids Management (Land Application) • Waste Conversion Industries, Inc. (Chemical Fixation) • Tule Ranch/Magan Farms (Land Application) • USA Transport (Land Application) Pima Gro and Bio Gro were told that as current Districts' contractors, their proposals would be evaluated differently than the other proposals because there would be no increased diversity gained by allocating additional biosolids to them, and as such would not be included in the RFP review process. Pima Gro chose to submit a proposal while Bio Gro chose to submit a unilateral pricing amendment to their existing contract by the RFP submittal deadline. As part of Pima Gro's proposal they provided an option to amend their existing contract to reflect operational changes, including a price decrease and the addition of permitted sites for biosolids application. The Districts' Environmental Compliance and Monitoring (ECM) staff recommends that Pima Gro's existing contract be amended to reflect these changes. Waste Conversion Industries, Inc. (WCI) submitted a proposal that named a temporary site in Corona, California. Due to the temporary nature of the site, ECM staff recommends that this proposal be considered as a twelve month demonstration project, and not be reviewed as part of the RFP. Proposal Evaluation A thorough evaluation of each proposal was performed by ECM staff, and was ranked based on 21 criteria of which cost was one criteria. In addition to the screening process staff conducted site inspections of all of the proposed firms sites as well as meeting with the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department. OMTS96-024 Page 4 of 6 November 6, 1996 The cost difference for the top five firms are listed in Table 4. The management costs are based upon 1,000 wet tons per week (52,000 wet tons per year). The estimated management costs will be based upon the estimated annual tonnage that the candidate firm would haul and manage. Conclusions From the proposal evaluation, several conclusions were drawn: • All five of the highest ranked firms are qualified to receive and properly manage the Districts' biosolids. • Tule Ranch earngd the highest overall ranking under the Evaluation Criteria. • Of the top five ranked firms, the Districts' criteria of reliability and diversity would be best achieved by Tule Ranch/Magan Farms. Tule Ranch/Magan Farms was established in 1963 with the sole purpose of fanning and began beneficial use of biosolids in 1994. Their proposal offers four different types of biosolids reuse options in a very remote area of both Kem and Kings Counties. • Tule Ranch/Magan Farms offers a cost that is less than our existing contractors with their lowest priced option ($19.85). Their proposal also provides an added incentive of revenue sharing with the Districts in the form of a minimum 5% of the gross revenues from the sales of crops grown on sites receiving Districts' biosolids. A typical wheat crop would yield $.55 per wet ton of biosolids. If Tule Ranch/Magan Farms was to receive 'h of the Districts' biosolids for this type of crop, the Districts would receive an estimated annual check for $33,550. • WCI offers the Districts an opportunity to participate in a Class A biosolids management option. WCI also provides the Districts with a local management site, albeit temporary. WCI's technology may provide a "tum-key" operation that could be used at the Districts' treatment plants in the future. Districts' biosolids processed into a Class A material at the WCI site can be used in Orange County without any regulation or permitting. A demonstration project would be limited to two loads per day at a cost not to exceed $17.00 per wet ton. • The WCI proposed demonstration option would increase the Districts' diversity by adding a separate technology for beneficial reuse. WCI uses a chemical process to produce a Class A material, as defined by 40 CFR Part 503, which is an organic-based soil amendment fertilizer. Because of the low management cost and low risk potential, the option should be considered. OMTS96-024 Page 5 of 6 November 6, 1996 • Adding Tule Ranch/Magan Farms (and WCI on a demonstration basis) to the Districts' biosolids management team will increase the reliability and diversity of the program, while decreasing overall management costs. This addition (including a new technology) will provide an added level of comfort during rainy periods. • RBM and Gardner Ranch do not add diversity to the Districts' biosolids management program because they operate in the vicinity or at the sites accessible to current Districts' contractors. • It is prudent, due to the need for reliability and diversity, for the Districts to maintain our current biosolids management contractors, Bio Gro and Pima Gro. Pima Gro and Bis Gro have provided the Districts with excellent service, and both have recently reduced their pricing prior to the RFP submittal deadline. Pima Gro's proposal should be used as a basis for minor modification of their existing contract. • After meeting with the Kam County Environmental Health Services Department, ECM staff believes that due to the increased amount of complaints in both eastern Kam County and other areas with significant public contact, biosolids management should be limited to remote areas in order to avoid adverse public acceptance issues and increased regulation. Staff Recommendation • Based on the conclusions stated above, staff recommends the following actions: 1. Authorize staff to enter into a five-year agreement with Tule Ranch/Magan Farms at a negotiated cost of not greater than $19.85 per wet ton for approximately 1,000 wet tons of biosolids per week. The agreement will include a provision for the Districts to receive revenue sharing of a minimum 5% of the gross revenues from the sales of crops grown on sites receiving Districts' biosolids. 2. Authorize staff to enter into a twelve month demonstration project with Waste Conversion Industries, Inc., at a negotiated price not to exceed $17.00 per wet ton for approximately 200 wet tons per week. The smaller quantity of biosolids recommended will allow this relatively new technology to continue to establish a market for the fertilizer product. Staff will monitor WCI closely to reduce the Districts' vulnerability. OMTS96-024 Page 6 of 6 November 6, 1996 3. Amend Pima Gro Systems, Inc., existing agreement with regards to cost to take advantage of the lower cost of service language proposed, and update the description of the additional agricultural sites used. LB:mcm J:WJN15.A1BAROLOINBIOSOUM50/56.RP f TABLE 1 BIOSOLIDS PROPOSAL COST AND TECHNOLOGY MATRIX Proposer Confidential Technology Location Pricing Per Wet Ton USA Transport None Land Application Kern County $23.50/Wet Ton (8 year contract) McCarthy Farms Financial Info Land Application/ Kings County $24.50/Wet Ton Cement Kiln Air Corcoran,CA/ Quality Treatment Luceme Valley RBM None Land Application Kern County (Wet Tons/Week) $25.30 @ 500 $2225 @ 900+ WCI None Chemical Fbartion City of Corona: $ 17.00/Wet Ton / Demo project site till May 97. Possible long tens site. CA Soil Products None Chemical Fbmfon San Bernardino Treat at Mecca: County (Wet Tons2 Wks) Mecca, CA $25.70 @ 2,000 $25.09 @ 6,000 Treat at CSDOC: $21.09 @ 2,000 $20.08 @ 6,000 Gardner Ranch Financial info Land Application Kern County $18.94/Wet Ton (no mind no max.) ERanchFinancial ncial info Land Application Kern County (Loads/Week) ding litigation Los Angeles $28.00 @ 0-69 County $21.92 @ 70-94 Riverside County $21.25 @ 85-03 $20.57 for 104+ info Land Application North Western $19.85 Kem County (Haul/spread/disc) South Eastern $22.40 Kings County (Haul/surface application/disc) $25.00 (HaulAnjection) $23.30 (Haul/combo of methods TABLE 2 BIOSOLIDS PRODUCTION HISTORY IN WET TONS PER YEAR Years/Flow Plant No. 1 Plant No. 2 Total Tons/ % Solids Tons / % Solids Tons 1986-1987/247 MGD 35,804/17.4% 109,339/21.3% 145,143 1987-1988/258 MGD 44.703/18.8% 104,406/23.5% 149,109 1988-1989/264 MGD 73,861 /18.6% , 129,324 24.3% 203,185 1989-1990/268 MGD 73,079/19.0% 144,880/23.8% 217,959 1990-19911269 MGD 55,123/18.5% 150,548/23.1% 205.671 1991-1992/227 MGD 46,368118.8% 155,105/22.5% 201,473 1992-1993 1232 MGD 50.359/18.8% 144,369/22.5% 194,728 1993-1994/231 MGD q 70,451 /19.8% 112,872/22.5% 183.323 1994-1995/243 MGD 69,927/19.9% 116,323/23.4% 186,250 t1995- 1996 1237 MGD 63,764/19.4% 120,438/22.5% 184,202 TABLE 3 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT EVALUATION CRITERIA Contractual Biosolids Management Site/Process Specifics Cost($NJet ton @ 200 WTPD) Years of Experience (Direct) Acreage Capacity(Wet Tons/Days Max) Years of Experience (Related) Proximity to Public Financial Stability Monitoring Program Process Reliability Insurance Requirements Duality Assurance Program Backup Provisions Responsiveness to RFP Emergency Response Program OdorNector Mitigation Reliability(Track Record) Private,Leased,or Indian Land Environmental Mitigabon Public Acceptance Responsiveness to RFP Responsiveness to RFP a TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED COSTS @ 52,000 WET TONSNEAR Firm Unit Cost Annual Cost Five-year Cost Ranked $Met Ton $ $ Tule Ranch 1 19.85 1,032,000 5,161,000 McCarthy Farms 2 24.60 1,274,000 6,370,000 USA Transport 3 23.50 1,222,000 61110,000 RBM 4 22.25 1.157,000 5,785,000 Gardner Ranch 5 18.94 984,880 4,924,400 TABLE 5 CURRENT VERSUS PROPOSED COSTS Wet Tons Per Year Cost Per Wet Ton Cost Per Year Contractor Current Proposed Current Proposed Current Proposetl Pima Gro 150,000 100,000 $21.92 $21.92 $ 3,288,000 $2,192,000 Bio Gro 33,000 40,000 $21.45 $21.45 $ 707,850 $ 858,000 Tule Ranch' 0 33,000 $ 19.85 $ 655,050 WCI 0 10,000 $ 17.00 $ 170,000 Average Cost Total Cost Per Wet Tan Per Year Current Prop, Current Proposed $21.81 $21.18 $3,995,850 $3,875,050 Cost Savings Cost Savings Per Wet ton Per Year $ 0.63 $ 120,800 Price does not reflect revenue sharing LB: J:\W PL1550\BAR0LDP8I0S0LID%50456.RP F,M s—.D- AGENDA ❑ COMIY.INFO.ITEM ITEM ❑ COM1M.ACTIONITEM ❑ Jr.BUS.CONSENT TRANSMITTAL B' Jr.BDS.DISCUSSION (NON{:ONSENT) ❑ PUBLIC HEARING 44/9 Jr.SM MEETING DATE L 9?40)JT.BOS AGENDA ITEM NO MEETING DATE COMM.ID. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION - (Indrals of Originator) OMITS: 11/6/96 PDC: PDC FAHR: FAHR ALL Div. 3410, Edward Torres,X3030 EXEC: EXEC Div. 3410.Jeff Brown,X3015 STEER: STEER JT.BDS: 1120196 Division Ne.,Name.And Exlereun AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wordina: AUTHORIZE SCREENINGS COMPACTOR PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION (All Districts): The Operations and Maintenance Department requests that the Project Report prepared by staff be received and filed and that staff be authorized to proceed with the purchase and installation of screenings compactor systems for a cost savings of approximately $60,000/year. Recommended Action(s): 1) Receive and file FSM Screenings Compactor Test Report, and 2) authorize staff to proceed with the purchase, design, and installation of screenings compactor systems at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 at a cost not to exceed the $150,000 budgeted in the FY 1996/97 CORF. CEQA REVIEW: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination flied on None BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $150,000 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF EXPENDITURES rcoe BA,el ow.Tn 1-1 SchedulefUre Item:Sm.S.pg.100.D.S.h $150,000 s0 $150,000 $150.000 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule t.me Item: AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED An (08M Budget for Grit and Screenings) $192,000.00 N/A ($60,000.00) $132,000.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE If YES,state numoer Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) IW211U To Committee: 1. Supplemental Staff Report _I Signature Date Division Manager(On si r ,Designnee) p— Signature Date To A. Bds.: Department Head (Or Designee)^^ p �� r �z�-c.�.s k�-rl �Al+t�ti- (o(z3(9b Signature Date Assistant General Manager (Or Designee) OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date: Approved: Amended: Forwarded to: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background arNor Summary) "Screenings" is the generic term for the rags, paper, and other material removed from the incoming wastewater by bar screens at the plant headworks. This material is removed from the plant by a contract hauler and landfilled. Since the screenings are saturated with water, a significant part of the total screenings weight is contributed by water. Some of the water can be removed by compacting (squeezing) the screenings. Screenings compactor devices accomplish this by forcing the screenings through a narrow opening or tube; mounting the tube at an upward angle allows gravity to aid in the compression process. An FSM screenings compactor was tested at Plant No. 1 for two months. The test demonstrated that the compactor removes substantial amounts of water from raw screenings. During the test period, the average weekly combined hauling weight for grit and screenings was reduced 41.1 percent, equivalent to estimated annual disposal cost savings at current rates of$23,790 (Plant 1) and $35,840 (Plant 2). Simple payback periods for permanent installations are estimated at 2.7 years (Plant 1) and 1.8 years (Plant 2), including allowances of $10,000 for installation costs at each plant. The compactor operated reliably throughout the test period, and O/M labor requirements were minimal. Operator involvement was limited to making periodic inspections to verify the machine's continuing operation. The test program was funded from a 1995-96 budget allocation. The total program cost was about$17,000, of which 90% were internal Districts costs. JB c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager H:\W P.DTAIOM'3410'BRO W NTSMCMPCTIAITCMPCT Revision: 812826 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS UI ORANGE COUMT,CALIFORNIA October 14, 1996 I I EWSAVENUE P.O.BOX 81" FOUNTAIN VALLEY.C IFORNIA 892&8127 (714)882.2In Supplemental Staff Report Screenings Compactor Procurement and Installation Background The Districts budgeted $192,000 (actual estimated expenditure is $144,000) in FY 96- 97 for disposal of headworks screenings material. This cost is based solely on the screenings' weight, and since the screenings are 80% water (20% solids), removing some of this water will directly reduce our costs. Compacting (squeezing) the material is effective in removing substantial amounts of excess water. Previous Studies In 1992, Districts staff conducted a field test of a Parkson RotoPress compactor. The manufacturer claimed the RotoPress would produce a product with 25 to 50 percent solids content. During the lest, the RotoPress did not perform acceptably. It experienced frequent operating problems and had difficulty processing the plant's peak screenings loads. In addition, a cost/benefit analysis showed that the annual costs for the RotoPress would exceed the projected savings even if the machine performed satisfactorily. By 1995, changes had occurred in the screenings processing equipment available on the market. Several dewatering devices were considered for testing. In late 1995, the Districts tested a Jones &Atwood Washpactor. This test was unsuccessful for two principal reasons: transporting the raw screenings into the machine was a continuing problem, and the intermittent operation of the bar screens produced short-term loadings that exceeded the machine's capacity, leading to severe plugging of the unit. However, the material that was processed successfully was relatively dry, clean, and compact, so the expected benefits of screenings washing and dewatering appeared to be validated. Current Study The FSM washing compactor was identified as a unit that might avoid the problems encountered with the Washpactor. The FSM machine uses a screw shaft to move the screenings as soon as they enter the feed hopper, thereby avoiding the conditions that led to the Washpactor's plugging. Also, the FSM device had successfully handled very large screenings loads in tests at the Talman Island W WTP in New York City, so short- term overloading in our operations did not appear likely. Screenings Compactor Procurement and Installation Page 2 October 14, 1996 Before the compactor was installed, grit and screenings disposal averaged 15.7 tons/week from Plant 1. While the compactor was in use, this figure was reduced to 9.2 tons/week, a 41.4% reduction. For a permanent installation, then, the hauling costs also should be reduced 41.4%. Budget Information The table below summarizes the estimated costs, cost savings, and payback periods for permanent compactor installations. The operating costs are negligible. A capital cost allowance is added for installation costs to account for the facilities modifications that would be needed to integrate the compactors with the screenings conveyors and disposal systems. Operations staff has worked with maintenance staff to develop costs for the installations. Staff expects that the engineering and installation work for permanent installations could be done completely in-house. Total Disposal w/o Disposal Simple Capital, Installation, Installed, Compaction, Cost Payback, Location $ $ $ $/yr Savings, $/yr years Plant 1 55,000 10,000 65,000 57,460 23,790 2.7 Plant 2 55,000 10,000 65,000 86,580 35,840 1.8 Total: 130,000 144,040 59,630 Staff believes there are sufficient proprietary design features of the FSM compactor that contributed to the success of the test program to justify a sole source purchase. These features include a single-motor/single-shaft design to improve reliability and an expanding diameter compaction zone to prevent plugging. However, if it is determined that a sole source purchase is not justified, the usual procurement procedures for competitive purchases will be followed. Recommendations 1. Receive and file the FSM Screenings Compactor Test Report. 2. Staff requests authorization to proceed with the purchase, design, and installation of screenings compactor systems at Plant 1 and Plant 2 at a cost not to exceed the $150,000 budgeted in the FY 96-97 CORF. m AGENDA z � ITEM TRANSMITTAL l �iQ�"BDS.i�EflNGDAYE .;, 5 „""..x �teQS;AGEtJCA£EEMN6- '�'� •"Y i . MEETING DATE CQMM: 'ljQ :-' -- DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initislsef Originator) ohrrs: 10/02/96 OMTgS , PDC: cocas. FAHR: .F All 3550, James Colston, 3655 EXEC .EC+j STEER: Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: 11/20/96 ; ___..;......_ AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wordina: Funding of the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) to perform wastewater and water quality research to advance science and technology for the benefit of the wastewater industry. Recommended Action(s); Authorize the budgeted funding for the WERF's Wastewater and Water Quality Research subscription from December 1, 1996 through November 30, 1997, in the amount of$63,250.00, CEQA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt• NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemphon Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on WA Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination filed on_ BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED ANT.: $63,250 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: JO EXPENDITURES (ra,llvdon eeTnvuft+) Schadulail ine hem:55(6765Do) $470.400 $0 $470,400 $470,400 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Una Item: AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT PO,CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT $63,250.00 $0.00 $63,250.00 $63.250.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRFSBOARD POLICY ACTION? NOTAPPLICABLE If YES,state number: —Permanent Limbed Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES' ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) & 6 �'////(-y4—_ /��76 To Committee: 1. Signature Date Division Manager( r Designe j tl b Signatu ate To A. Bds.: 1. List of WERF Subscribers Depa H It r sig a 2. List of WERF Research Projects V3.Abstract of Benchmarking Project igir ure 416 Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date: Approved: Amended: Forwarded to: ADDmONAL INFORMATION(Sadground aMror Summary) [See supporting attachments.] The Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) is a non-profit organization affiliated with the Water Environment Federation (WEF). WERF was established to advance science and technology for the benefit of the wastewater treatment industry and its customers by addressing water quality issues with a commitment to environmental protection, economic conservancy and enhanced quality of life. WERF is funded through voluntary contributions and grants. WERF manages research under four Thrust Areas: Collection and Treatment Systems, Human Health and Environmental Effects, Integrated Resources Management, and Residuals Management. WERF Subscribers represent wastewater utilities representing more than 60% of the U.S. sewered population and more than 60 corporations sharing concerns for water quality issues. WERF seeks cost-effective, publicly acceptable, environmentally sound solutions to water pollution control problems. WERF's goal is to eliminate redundant studies within the profession and increase the value and knowledge of each subscriber's individual research program. WERF provides workshops, newsletters, reports, papers, computer programs and video presentations as a means of disseminating research results which directly benefit subscribers. The Districts support of WERF provides an excellent return on its investment. With a total WERF research budget of$22.5 million,the Districts benefits from over$350 worth of research for every$1 contributed. Furthermore,the Districts takes part in project seeping and implementation, assuring that results are relevant to the day to day operations of the wastewater treatment plants(Chlorine replacement technologies alone save the Districts over$500,000 per year.). The Districts have already utilized WERF as a resource to help solve problems and network with other agencies sharing similar interest. The Districts has also received direct financial benefits from WERF, most recently realized with WERF's grant of$50.000.00 for the Districts' research on the use of biofiltration for odor control. WERF has contributed other grant monies to the Districts for research on human pathogens in wastewater. WERF manages the research and coordinates the parties involved,with the actual work being carried out by individual organizations, primarily utilities, and industrial and commercial firms. To ensure objectivity, an independent advisory committee of scientists and engineers help select researchers, oversees the studies, and provides periodic review and advice. Benefits accrue to the Districts in the form of services, technological advances, and information for direct application. Technical Services has budgeted for the WERF subscription in their fiscal 1996-97 budget, and has recently received an invoice from WERF. The subscription transaction cannot proceed without OUTS and Joint Boards approval. JC c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:\WPIAGENDA\0MTS\0CT\WERF1. Page 2 of Revsion: 628188 ATTACHM 9,'r # 1 ENVIRONMENTWATER • k • UTILITY SUBSCRIBERS Little Blue Valley Sewer District,MO Adrian,City of.MI Little Rock Wastewater Utiliy,AR Akron,City of,OH Lodi,City of.CA Ames,City of,IA Los Angeles,City of,CA Anchorage Water and Sewer Utilities,AK Loudoun County Sanitation Authority,VA Ann Arbor Utilities Department,MI Louisville&Jefferson County,KY Anne Arundel County Department of Utilities,MD Macon-Bibb County Water and Sewerage Authority,GA Atlanta Bureau of Pollution Control,GA Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District,WI Austin,City of,TX Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Baltimore,City of,MD Mesa,City of,AZ Belmont County,OH Metro Nashville Water Services,TN Bloomington Normal Water Reclamation District,IL Metro Sewer District ofGMder Cincinnati.OH Carbarrus County Water&Sewer Agency,NC Metropolitan Waste Control Commission,St.Paul,MN Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,CA Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago,IL Charleston Commissioners of Public Works,SC Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District,WI Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utility Department,NC Montecilo Sanitary District,CA Cleveland,City of,TN Montgomery,City of AL Cobb County-Mariena Water Authority,GA Mount Pleasant Waterworks and Sewer Commission,SC Cobb County Water System,GA Nassau,County of,NY Colorado Springs,City of,CO New York City Department of Environmental Protection,NY Columbus,City of,OH North Shore Sanitary District,IL Columbus Water Works,GA Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District,OH Contra Costa Water District,CA Orange County Public Utilities,FL Cmatline Sanitation District,CA Orange Water&Sewer Authority,NC Dallas Water Utilities,TX Orlando,City of,FL Detroit,City of,MI Owosso,City of,Department of Utilities,MI Downers Grove Sanitary District,IL Palo Alto,City of,CA Dublin San Ramon Services District,CA Philadelphia,City of,PA Durham,City of,NC Phoenix Water Services Department,AZ East Bay Municipal Utility District,CA Racine,City of,Wl El Paso Water Utilities,TX Reedy Creek Improvement Dist.,FL Escambia County Utilities,FL (Pan ofThe Walt Disney Co.) Escondido,City of,CA Richmond City of,VA Eugene/Springfield Water Pollution Control,OR Rio Rancho,City of,NM Fort Worth,City of,TX Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District,CA Fortuna,City of,CA Saginaw,City of,MI Fox River Water Reclamation District,IL Salt Lake City Corporation,UT Garland,City of,TX San Antonio,City of TX Glendale,City of,AZ San Diego Clean Water Program,CA Grand Rapids,City of,MI San Francisco,Department of Public Works,CA Green Bay Metro Sewerage District,W 1 San Jose,City of,CA Gwinnet County Public Utilities,GA Scottsdale Water Resources Department,AZ Hampton Roads Sanitation District,VA Seminole County Public Works-Environmental Services,FL Houston,City of,TX South Bayside System Authority,CA Independence,City of,MO South Coast Water District,CA Irvine Ranch Water District,CA Spartanburg Sanitary Sewer District,SC Jacksonville Department of Public Utilities,FL Spokane,City of,WA Jacksonville Suburban Utilities Corp..FL Stonington,Two of,CT Johnson County Unified Wastewater Districts,KS Tampa Sanitary Sewers Dept.,FL Kalamazoo,City of,MI Toledo,City of,OH Kansas City,City of,KS Tulsa,City of,OK Kansas City,Water and Pollution Control.MO Unified Sewerage Agency,OR Kenosha,City of,WI Union Sanitary District,CA King County-Dept.ofMctro Services-Metro,(Seattle,WA) Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission,MD Kissimmee Water&Sewer Dept.,FL Wausau Scwcmgc Utility Commission,WI Knoxville Utilities Board,TN West Palm Beach,City of,PL Las Virgenes Municipal Water District,CA Wyoming,City of,MI iv WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH FOUNDATION WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH FOUNDATION SUBSCRIBERS CORPORATE SUBSCRIBERS Member Associations AG-Chem Equipment Company,Inc. Alabama's WEA Alan Plummer&Associates Alaska Water Management Association Anglian Water Services Limited Arizona W&PCA Bio Gm Systems.Inc. British Columbia PCA Black&Veatch California WEA Boyle Engineering Corporation Central States WEA Brown and Caldwell Chesapeake WEA Burgett&Niple,Limited Federal Water Quality Association Bruns&McDonnell Florida WEA Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. Georgia W&PCA CH2M Hill,Inc. Hawaii WEA Chevron Research&Technology Co. Illinois WEA Delon Hampton&Associates Chartered Indiana WPCA Eastman Kodak Company Iowa WPCA E.J.duPont de Nemoars&Co.Inc. Louisiana WEA EMA Services,Inc. Michigan WEA Envirea,Inc. Minnesota WOA Etwimmega,Ltd. Missouri WEA The ERM Group Nebraska WEA The Eshelman Company,Inc. Nevada WPCA Fischer&Porter[Canada]Limited New England WEA Gore&Storrie Limited New Jersey WEA Hazen and Sawyer,P.C. New York WEA Hendon Engineering Associates Inc. North Carolina WEA Heyward Inc. North Dakota WEA Humboldt Decanter Inc. Ohio WEA—NW Section Infilco Degremont,Inc. Ohio WEA Jacobson Helgoth Consultants WEA of Ontario John Camillo Engineers,Inc. Pacific Northwest PCA Jordan,Jones&Goulding,Inc. Pennsylvania WEA Komline Sanderson Pennsylvania,Eastem WPC Operators Assoc. KW Brown Environmental Services Rocky Mountain WPCA Lawler,Matusky and Skelly Engineers W&PCA of South Carolina Malcolm Pimie,Inc. WEA ofTesss McNamee,Printer&Seeley Virginia WEA Metcalf&Eddy MoBa&Associates Montgomery Watson Norcheri Industries N-Viro International Corp. Parsons Engineering Science,Inc Post,Buckley,Schuh&Jernigan Roy F Weston,Inc. Royce Instrument Corp. Rust Environment and Infrastructure,Inc. Sharples Division,Alfa-Laval Separation,Inc. Shell Oil Company Sverdrup Corporation Tetra Tech,Inc. Trojan Technologies,Inc. Wade-Trim/Associates Water Research Center Wight Consulting Engineers,Inc. Subscribers and Member Aa Iaions as ofAp611,1995. Research & Development Plan: 1995-1999 v ATTAQA'lMT #2 IDENTIFIED RESEARCH PROGRAM Below is a listing of those projects which W ERF has identified for funding over the next five years.Those projects which are pan of WERF's Targeted Collaborative Research(TCR) Program or part of a cooperative research effort have been identified.Those projects asterisked are projects which are under development; however,the exact project period has not been defined. 1995 1 1996 1 1997 1998 1999 Collection and Treatment Systems i' Biodegradation of organic Pollutants in Anaerobic t' Digestion r Comparison of Uv Irradiation to Chlorination: Guidance for Achieving Optional UV Performance Control and Production of Toxic Air Emissiom j( by POTW Odor Control ;.. Equipment Vapor-Phase Biological Control of POTW Air Emisslom Evaluation of Biodegradation of Toxic Organic Chemicals I Son Aquifer Treatment COOPERA17VE I W Absorben in Wastewater. Charaderization,Effects,and pretreatment I The Equilibrium and Rate of Heavy Metal Uptake by Wastewater Particulates I I I •Municipal Water and Sewage Treatment project COOPERATIVE Secondary Clarification AssMsmeM •Assessment of Innovative Techrwlogies for Watewater Treatment I I I •Rainfall Induced Infiltration Impacts on Sanitary Sewer Overflows I I •Evaluation of Control Measures for SSCe and CSos ��•q�/�p� (Wet Weather Research Information Program) t� Research & Development Plan: 1995-1999 33 WERF'S IDENTIFIED RESEARCH PROGRAM 1995-1999 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Human Health and Environmental Effects Develop,Test,Validate, and Refine Protocols for Assessing Aquatic Ecological Risks Region Specific TimeScxle Toxicity in Aquatic Ecosystems I Whole Effluent Toxicity TCRALEArr POTW Survey -m-a.d- Whole Effluent Toxicity TCRALERT Variability Study Relationship of of Whole Effluent Toxicity to Instream Toxicity Integrated Resources Management Identification and Evalua- tion of Use-Attainability Methodologies for Aquatic Ecosystems Identifying Effective Sampling Protocols for NP5 Pollutants Models for Alteration of Sediments by Benthic Organisms Watershed Management Protocol and Watershed TCRALERT Level Risk Assessment I Stripping and Volatilization in Wastewater Facilities I Corutnrcted Wetlands Treatment of High Nitrogen Landfill Leachate I 1 Use of Riparian Buffer Zones and Constructed Wetlands in Water Quality Management Programs I I Understanding the Impact of NPS Snowmelt on Receiving Water Source Control Assessment 'Stormwater Indicators Demonstration Projects 34 WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH FOUNDATION WERF'S IDENTIFIED RESEARCH PROGRAM 1995-1999 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Residuals Management Polymer Characterization and Control in Biosolids Management The Use of Treated Municipal Wastewater Effluents and Sludge in COOPERATIVE the Production of Crops for Human Consumption Biosolids and Water Treatment jCRALFRT Residuals Marketing Manual �..m.....-...�- I Establishing Siosolids Stability Criteria I Evaluate and Quantify TCR ALERT Sludge Incinerator IWALER Hydrocarbon Emissions I Influence of Polymer Chemistry on Biosolids and the Environment I I Long Term Fate of Land Applied Wastewater Materials COOPERATIVE I Demonstration of the Soil Remediation with Biosolids to Reduce Bioavailability of Metals I Development of Innovative Low Cost Technology for Production of Class A Biosolids I Understanding Fate,Transport Sioavailability and Cycling of Metals in Land Applied Biosolids I •Biosolids Impacts on Watersheds I •Independent Assessment of Innovative Biosolids Management Techniques Research & Development Plan: 1995-1999 35 6 Water Environment Research Foundation Progress NRC Biosolids Report Looking Ahead.. Available Free to WERF Identifies Future Research Topics WERF Subscribers WERF is continually looking ahead in an effort to identify areas of future research. Below is a list of research topics created in response to Sub- scribers' priorities and recommended by WERF's Research Council for future funding. Some of these topics will be assigned to WERF Project �wrnn Subcommittees and Requests for Proposals will be developed as funding becomes available. If you are interested in any of these topics and would like to volunteer to participate on a Project Subcommittee, please con- tact the Foundation at (703)684-2470. vsa Assess Status Usefulness and ys Nitrogen Management Resource Requirements for Protocols for Biosolids Benefi- +-v^^'^: Implementation for cial Use Biocriteria Water Quality Standards Workplace Exposure Control The National Research Council's Innovative Enhancements to Low Emission POTW Collec- (NRC's) newly released report, Use Stormwater Detention Ponds tion System Assessment/ nd in o(Reclaimed Water a Sludge [o Remove Metals Workshop Food Crop Production is the result of a collaborative research effort .r Re-engineering W WTP to be Ny. Methodology for Document- involving the Water Environment Low Man-Hour Facilities ing Cost/Benefit of Research Research Foundation, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, h Obtaining Pathogen Equiva- N% Innovative Biosolids Dewater- and the Association of Metropoli- lency Certification of Selected ing Processes tan Sewerage Agencies. Innovative Class A Biosolids Assessment of Cases Where The report, based upon studies undertaken by NBC's Water Understand Fate&Transport Pollutant Trading and Multi- Science and Technology Board, of Selected Metals Anions media Effects Have Been Used found that treated municipal Incorporated in POTW to Establish POTW and wastewater biosolids can be used Particulates Industry Requirements safely on food crops when done in � Metals Bioavailability in Land accordance with federal regula- a'� Pathogen Destruction Effi- Applied Biosolids tions. "The survey, though con- ciency in Higher Temperature pP ducted and prepared indepen- Anaerobic Digestion Systems N�, Nonpotable Water Reuse dently by NBC, covered an area of N% Development of Practical Management Practices emphasis for WERF's Subscribers," Monitoring Techniques to Assessment of Decision said Glenn Reinhardt, WERF �'6 Executive Director. "The Founda- Identify the Probability of the Criteria Used to Determine Presence of Pathogens in Benefits of CSO/SSO/SW coltaborate with other agencies is always looking for ways to Receiving Waters Investments collaborate and organizations in order to -s„s Innovative Materials/Tech- Development of Predictive effectively leverage Subscriber niques for New and Replace- Tools for Measuring Sewer funds and meet their research ment Sewers Aging and Degradation needs." One complimentary copy of Adapt or Develop Metals -•,,, Ecological Impact of Biosolids this publication is available free of Control Technologies for Beneficial Uses, 1. Assessment charge to WERF Subscribers, with Municipal Treatment Applica- (1 Year);2. Protocol Develop- additional copies available for $10. tions ment (2 Years) To order, Subscribers should call the Foundation at (703)684-2470. Implementation of WERF WEF members may purchase the Products: Demonstration of report for$29 by calling(800)666- Ecological Risk Assessment 0206 and referring to order no. Ill 6138.A ATMC1^fEN"P =3 .x Water Environment Research Foundation 04 J a aI ! Fall 1996 Volume 7, Issue 4 Project Profile: Benchmarking New, Innovative Methods and Software Kick-Off Meeting Allow for Risk-Based Evaluations of WERP's project, Benchmarking Water Quality Problems Wastewater Treatment Plant Opera- tions, held a kick-off focus group The Water Environment Research ods are deterministic, whereas meeting on July 16, 1996 In Den- Foundation's most recently com- AERA is both quantitative and ver, CO.The project's goal is to pleted research project,Aquatic Eco- probabilistic. For example, deter- establish a benchmarking frame- logical Risk Assessment:A Multi-Tierert ministic methods may describe work to help focus efforts on when Approach, provides new, aquatic risk as "exceeding the acute water and how to improve treatment op- ecological risk assessment(AERA) quality standard for zinc in Clear erations and reduce costs.The pur- methods and Windows software Creek will cause adverse effects to pose of this meeting was to review that estimates the probability and aquatic Insects." In comparison, the project objectives,determine magnitude of adverse effects to or- AERA methodology could charac- stakeholders needs, performance ganisms from exposure to one or terize the same risk as"a 50%prob- measures, and explanatory factors. more toxic chemicals.The Project ability that 596 or more of the in- The focus group consists of Team, which consisted of research- sect species in Clear Creek will members of the Project Steering ers from The Cadmus Group, Inc., be lost from acute zinc toxicity." Committee who have financially developed the methods which will With use of the AERA, evalu- contributed to the research.This lead to more cost-effective alloca- ation of water quality problems group will help In the development tion of resources for water quality caused by toxic chemicals can be of the benchmarking survey and Improvement. Aquatic biologists risk-based instead of solely regula- will be the test group providing the and water quality managers can use tion-based. The difference between preliminary benchmarking data. the methods to estimate potential these two approaches can be ex- At the meeting, facilitated by aquatic ecological risks of chemicals plained as follows: A regulation- the Water Research Center(WRc) in surface water.The methods are based approach requires that an Project Team, participants were also a consensus-building tool to effluent be cleaned up to a concen- divided into seven workgroups help answer the question, "how tfation prescribed by a regulation (Table 1). Each group was asked to clean is clean enough?" (e.g., a water quality standard). consider the requirements of stake- Most existing assessment meth- continued on page 6 holders, develop candidate perfor- mance measures, Identify relevant explanatory factors, identify best Benefits of Aquatic Risk Methodology comimted oil page 10 N% Allows the comparison of the ecological benefits of alternative treat- ment, cleanup plans, or proposed water quality standards to deter- mine the most cost-effective option for protecting aquatic life. Inside This Issue... M. Includes easy-to-use Windows software, producing graphical illustra- tions of risks and uncertainties, that allows for the rapid assessment Research Focuses on and Interpretation of risks for multiple chemicals. Residual Polymer.....................................3 Provides methods that are applicable to single and multiple chemi- New Directors..........................................3 cals.These methods can be applied at different geographic levels to Publication Order Form........................7-3 assess risks of toxic chemicals at sites within waterbodies,a portion of a waterbody, an entire waterbody, or an entire watershed. RFP's Just Released ................................9 1 10 Water Environment Research Foundation Progress New Publication Release! Benchmarking live). Preliminary findings will be continued(roar page l shared with the Steering Commit. Controlling Odors, tee in October 1996. Results of Air Toxics, and Ozone practices, and identify practitioners the survey will be presented at a of best practices based on reputa. workshop on December 10, 1996 Precursor Emissions tion and personal knowledge. in Arlington, Va:(Seepage 4). WERF just released A Critical Review According to Peter Ruffier of For more information on this of Odor Control Equipment for Toxic the City of Eugene, OR, "the con- project, please call Kaye Grant at Air Emissions Reduction.This re- sensus was to decrease the depth of (703)684-2470.• search, conducted by Fast Bay Mu- the study and increase Its breadth nicipal Utility District,CA, provides to include elements outside of Table 1. publicly owned treatment works plant operations such as manage- Benchmarking (POTWs)with the advanced under- ment, collection systems, and Workgroups standing required to determine If an customer service.The project existing wet chemical odor control should focus on the elements Wet Train device might also control air toxics which create 20%of the problems Btosolids Management and ozone precursor emissions. and 801R,of the expenses. (Dry Train) POTWs are faced with the Since the.luly meeting, the Finance and Administration/ prospect of federal,state, and local benchmarking survey has been Capital Planning d ib to t d di d t an distributed lee regulation of air toxics and/or comp labor and Staffing ozone precursor emissions. Many the focus group.The survey was Collection Systems POTWs have Installed, or plan to structured to request both cost Customer Service Install,odor control facilities. Information (quantitative)and Therefore,a cost-effective and time- Information on practices(qualita. Automation effective approach for meeting the new and pending regulations might be to modify existing odor control equipment to control air toxics and ozone precursor emissions. This report chronicles three years of research Into: the develop- WaiprEnvironment metntnh of to artifact-free sampling Research Foundation Non-Profit Org. methodology and POTW-specific U.B.Postage sampling and analytical protocols 601 Wythe Street PAID that received extensive peer and Alexandria, VA 22314-1994 Southern Marylantl regulatory reviews; bench-scale PermB No.3905 evaluations that address complex issues regarding haloform formation In wet chemical foul air odor control equipment(e.g., packed tower and atomized mist scrubbers) and air toxics and ozone precursors emissions removal mechanisms; and full-scale and pilot-scale evalua. tions of packed tower and atomized mist scrubbers to further address these issues. To order a copy of A Critical NANCY WHEATLEY Review of Odor Control Equipment ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION D 10 for Toxic Air Emissions Reduction, ORANGE COUNTY WERF Subscribers should call (703) P.O. BOX 8127 684.2470,and Water Environment FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92728=8127 Federation Members and other II,III.IIIIIIIII,IIIIII,I.IIIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIIII.IIIIII.IIIII.I should call (800)666-0206, referring to publication number D53010. As a benefit of joining the Foun- dation, WERF Subscribers may re- ceive a complimentary copy of this research report with additional copies available at cost, or S 10. ® Printed on recycled palm County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 6127 • 10644 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 9272"127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, November 7. 1996, at 5:30 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on November 7, 1996, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Present: Staff Present: Sheldon Singer, Chair Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager John Collins, Joint Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Walter K Bowman Bob Collett, Director of Operations S Maintenance Shirley Dettloff Mike Fetterman, Director of Human Resources Don Griffin John Linder, Construction Manager Margie Rice Doug Stewart, Engineering Manager Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Tom Dawes, Planning Manager Charles Sylvia John Dettle, Project Manager Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager Absent Others Present: Barry Hammond, Vice Chair Daniel Welch Paul Gustafson, CDM Bob Zemel Duane Jensen, Carollo Engineers Bill Knopf, Carollo Engineers APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the October 3, 1996 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting were approved as drafted. r Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 2 November 7, 1996 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair had no report. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager had no report. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION The Assistant General Manager of Administration had no report. REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-OPERATIONS The Assistant General Manager of Operations provided an update on the status of the drug investigation at the Districts. He also provided information regarding an informal proposal from the City of Newport Beach to transport the naturally occurring methane gas that causes odors and explosibility concerns along Pacific Coast Highway, to our plant to be used in the central generation project. Status of our Ocean Discharge Permit was given. It was hoped to have it finalized this year. As EPA was writing the draft permit, they found a regulatory glitch in the designation of the offshore waters as recreational waters. We are working with them on this. A workshop had been scheduled with the Regional Water Quality Control Board on November 22, but it was thought better to delay the workshop until some of these technical and regulatory issues are better understood. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING The Director of Engineering advised that the Districts have formed a Water Conservation Committee, which includes Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Metropolitan Water District of Orange County, Orange County Water District, Irvine Ranch Water District, City of Anaheim, and several south county agencies. The purpose of the Committee is to look at water conservation programs, research programs for rebates and retrofits, and encourage public education on water conservation issues. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair advised that he and the Director of Technical Services met with SAWPA's Executive Board. SAWPA agreed to sign the payment guarantee agreement, and our General Counsel has redrafted and forwarded it to SAWPA's Boards to be signed. He also reported that LAFCO had on their agenda at yesterday's meeting an issue regarding the consolidation of the Sanitation Districts. He urged LAFCO to let the Districts handle the consolidation efforts through our Boards. He informed them that we wanted to get feedback from the Cities that are our major stakeholders, and that we believed that we needed some additional legislation because of the inadequacies of the two items in the state health safety code, existing sections 4730 and 4730.1, do not deal with our issues Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 3 November 7, 1996 specifically or satisfactorily, therefore, a new section that meets our needs should be written. Mr. Huntley, who was the proponent of this, made the motion to allow us to handle the situation ourselves. The Joint Chair provided an update on the Bolsa Chica State Beach sewer line repair and replacement. Mr. Pringle has not returned the Joint Chairs telephone calls. We had hoped for his support to have two governmental agencies work together to solve a State problem. The Assistant General Manager of Operations added that the State Park's staff is still trying to promote the repair. As of right now, given we can come up with an agreement, a straight replacement of the existing system would be allowable, with work probably not starting until the spring of next year. It is very likely there will not be a fixed sewer system at Bolsa Chica State Park until the fall of 1997. If the State does not get its collective act together, it could extend for another year. This should be relatively easy for someone within the legislation to get Bolsa Chica back on line in serving the public. MONTHLY REPORT ON CHANGE ORDERS Information Item. The Director of Engineering reviewed the Monthly Change Order Report dated November 7, 1996. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-8) 1. PDC96-52: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO CONTRACT 5-37-3 WITH WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, PHASE 3 (District No. 5): The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 4, providing ten items of additional work. RECOMMENDED ACTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval of Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. 5-37-3 with Wal-Con Construction Company for an addition of$204,943.00, increasing the total contract amount to $2,645,401.03. 2. PDC96-53: PRESENTATION ON STRATEGIC PLAN SCHEDULE (All Districts): The Director of Engineering will make a presentation on the Strategic Plan and changes in the schedule which result from delay in starting Phase III, Preparation of Programmatic Environmental Impact Report on Wastewater Strategic Plan, Job No. J-40-4. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Information Only Item. 3. PDC96-54: ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) WITH CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE FOR JOB NOS. J40-1 AND J-40-2 RE PREPARATION OF PHASE I OF STRATEGIC PLAN (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests approval of an Addendum to the PSA providing for added public involvements for Project Nos. 2 and 3 of the first phase of the Strategic Plan (Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, Job No. J40-1 and Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedules, Job No. J40-2). RECOMMENDED ACTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried with two nays to recommend approval of Addendum No. 1 to the PSA with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. in the amount of$138,985 for a total amount not to exceed $1,534,625. I Y Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 4 November 7, 1996 4. PDC96-55: JOB NO. J-34-1, OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND JOB NO. P2-35-5, PHASE 2 SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to Advanco Constructors to rebuild an ocean outfall surge tower, landscape adjacent areas, and perform other miscellaneous work. RECOMMENDED ACTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend 1) Approval of Addendum Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications, adding minor work; increasing the contract time from 550 to 730 calendar days; adding new construction scheduling requirements and changing the date for receipt of bids from October 7 to October 15, 1996; 2) approval to receiving and file bid tabulation; and 3) approval to authorize award of a contract for Job No. J-34-1, Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, and Job No. P2-35-5, Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2 to Advanco Constructors for construction of said projects in the total amount of$7,122,693. 5. PDC96-56: ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR ADDED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES RE JOB NO.J-34-1, OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND JOB NO. P2-35-5, PHASE 2 SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2 (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests approval of an Addendum with Carollo Engineering to provide a construction manager. RECOMMENDED ACTION: After much discussion, Committee requested this item be brought back to the January 1997 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting for further discussion. Staff was directed to investigate alternatives including permanent addition to staff and addition of contract employees. S. PDC96-57: JOB NO. J-11-2, RESTORATION OF OLD LABORATORY FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT(All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests an increase in authorized funds of$101,000.00, bringing the project total to $525,000 to cover all anticipated costs required to complete the project. RECOMMENDED ACTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried with one nay to recommend approval to authorize funds in the amount of$525,000.00 for the Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department. 7. PDC96-58: ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P140-1, AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. 152-47-1 (All Districts): The Engineering Department and the Director of Engineering requests that the Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers , Inc., be amended providing for additional engineering services for design changes. RECOMMENDED ACTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly carried to recommend approval of Addendum No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., in the amount of$244,277.00 for a total amount not to exceed $1,492,244.00. Minutes of the Planning, Design and Construction Committee Page 5 November 7, 1996 8. POC96-59: ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE AND RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., FOR FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO, 1, JOB NO. P140-2, AND FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P247-2. (All Districts): The Engineering Department requests approval of an addendum to the agreement providing for additional engineering services for design changes, deletion of a design task, engineering services to support Districts staff for rebidding and bid protest of a contract, preparation of second bid package due to phasing the work to support budget constraints and additional project management services due to project delays at an increase of$33,969.00. RECOMMENDED ACTION: It was moved, seconded, and duly cashed to approve Addendum No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., in the amount of$33,969.00, for a total amount not to exceed $593,715.00. CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS, OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY The Chair announced that this would be Don Griffin's last meeting, and he and the Joint Chair thanked Don for all his expertise in the past. There were numerous, positive comments by Committee members, and all wished him good luck. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee meeting is scheduled for January 9, 1997. ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Submitted by: r � Gail Cam Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Secretary :gc J:.a000nocaauro~w Swa AGENDA a ITEM TRANSMITTAL — ,= • mm MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (InRials of Onglnalan OMTS: PDc: 1117/96 FAHR: F ALL 3730,Tom Dawes, Extension 5080 EXEC: STEER: Oldslon No.,Name,and Edenton JT.BDS:11/20/96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT(PSA) WITH CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE FOR JOB NOS. J-40.1 AND J-40-2 RE PREPARATION OF PHASE I OF STRATEGIC PLAN (ALL DISTRICTS): The Director of Engineering requests approval of an Addendum to the PSA providing for added public involvements for Project Nos. 2 and 3 of the first phase of the Strategic Plan (Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, Job No. J-4D-1 and Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedules, Job No. J-40-2). Recommended Action(s): Approve Addendum No. 1 to the PSA with Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. in the amount of$138,985 for a total amount not to exceed $1,534,625. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Dale Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved an September 25, 1996 Final EIR Approved on_and Notice of Determination filed on_ BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $1,970,000 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF EXPENDITURES Reweuaoexiu.T.Ww j SchedAMOUNT le/une TRANSFER: D.l.d $900,000 $430,000 $470,1100 $1,970,000 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Lim ltam: AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AR $1,395,640.00 -0- $138,985.00 $1,534,625.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES 130AR13 POLICY ACTION? NO II YES,state number _P Umlted Term I If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section CON fjENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) Y `O/�s To Committee: Sig t e Date D' sion Me or r Design Signature Date To JL Sds.: Depa e e ;( sign e ( m /rEi Signafure ate Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) - q r , ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) Phase I of the Strategic Plan includes three projects, two of which, Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, Job No. J-40-1 and Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedules, Job No. J-40-2 were awarded under a Professional Services Agreement to Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. in March 1996. Project No. 2 is the study of the Districts' hydraulic system, including the collection and ocean disposal facilities. This project is on schedule and to date, land use, demographic and other wastewater generating data has been gathered together with information necessary for the first phase of an inflow and infiltration analysis. Work is proceeding on evaluating the data and determining the best alternatives. Project No. 3 is a financial analysis that is reviewing the capital facilities connection charge and the annual sanitary sewer use charge with a goal of obtaining the most equitable financial charge possible. Both of these projects (and Project No. 1, a separate project, Investigation and Repair of Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-39) include extensive stakeholder involvement. The decisions that will be reached through the strategic planning process will set the Districts' course for many years, Public participation is a major part of the work, including participation in a decision-model process with all stakeholders. Camp Dresser& McKee is using a decision support tool and structured public workshops. The first workshop held in June of this year was a disappointment. After sending out approximately 1,600 invitations to community leaders and placing advertisements in both local newspapers only about a dozen people attended the evening meeting. Because of that poor result, it was decided to forth advisory committees and two such committees, the Rate Advisory Committee (RAC)for Project No. 3 and the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) for Project No. 2 have been formed. About 25 community leaders serve on each committee, representing a variety of interests. These committees will provide oversight on the planning process, give independent recommendation to the Boards of Directors, and suggestions and guidance to the consultants and staff. Both the consultants and staff believe that this public involvement is necessary and will provide benefits. However, there is a substantial increase in the consultants' work effort to provide the necessary support for the meetings planned for the RAC, PAC and the newly formed Ad hoc Committee re Strategic Plan of the Boards of Directors. Estimates of the added public involvement work have resulted in the request for extra services in Addendum No. 1, in the amount of$138,985. The change in requested services follows: Public Participation Element Strategic Plan Phase I. Project Nos. 2 & 3 Original Scope Current Proposal Change Quarterly Board Workshops Quarterly Board Workshops Public Workshops One Public Workshops Meetings with interest groups 12 RAC& PAC Workshops Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Meetings with Interest Groups 2029 hours Requested: 3273 hours 1244 hours TMD:dI c: Department Head AGM-Administration JIWPDOCWGENDANITS-96WOV0602 Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM 2 TRANSMITTAL F V ( MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Inlasisof Originator) OMTS: PDC: 11m96 FAHR: ,w'. ALL EXEC: r 3730,Tom Dawes,extension 5080 STEER: JT.BOS: 1120/96 DWlebn No.,Name,and Extension AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: JOB NO.J-34-1,OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND JOB NO.P2-35-5, PHASE 2 SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO.2(ALL DISTRICTS):The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to Advanco Constructors to rebuild an ocean outfall surge tower, landscape adjacent areas, and perform other miscellaneous work Recommended Action(s): 1. Approve Addendum Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications,adding minor work;increasing the contract time from 550 to 730 calendar days;adding new construction scheduling requirements and changing the date for receipt of bids from October 7 to October 15, 1996. 2. Receive and file bid tabulation 3. Authorize award of a contract for Job No.J-34-1, Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, and Job No.P2-35-5,Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No.2 to Advanco Constructors for construction of said projects in the total amount of $7,122,693. CEQAREWEW: Prujectls Exempt: DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Dale Notice of Exampaon Filed:FIR approved July 1989 Supplement No.3 Approved on February a.1995 and Notice of Dekrmination filed on FebrrMry 9.1995 August 1996 BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TOAATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $8,T70,000 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF EXPENDITURES gomiamoeipw.ra,m.:sl SchedAMOUNT TRANSFER: and C2a $1,075,000 $55,000 $1,020,000 $8,770,000 AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: ScheduleANe Item: AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTEDTHIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AT $7,122,693.00 N/A $7,122.693.00 $7,122,693.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,state number. _Permanent 1-mited Term IIYES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONC7ENCE /� ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) yr 6A /`6 To Committee: 1. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation,4 Sig D si ture Date on ag r rD e) 2��j O'T / Signatur Date De a e (Or 'gn To A. Bds.: 1. Bid Tabulation and Recommendation / e r f gnature bate Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) y ,� RAT$CDMt,E Q$� FDG 6DMflC`'- �. -1 [:AFIR�CON�1. , .IOINT',BDARDS` APPro �arvlarded to E '- ' ' y E ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) This job is the construction of two projects. The largest portion of the work is the rebuilding of the surge tower on our standby outfall. The design of this work was completed by Carollo Engineers under a PSA dated April 1993 which included other, already completed tasks. One of those tasks was the preparation of a reliability study which recommended that the surge tower on our standby emergency outfall be extended higher for hydraulic reasons (it is currently about 20-feet lower than the surge tower on our 120-inch outfall). The old surge tower could not be extended because of structural problems. Under our earthquake resistance studies, a fracture of the Inglewood-Newport fault was found under the existing tower; therefore, the new tower was designed some 400-feet south of the existing tower. Separately, a design contract was awarded to Brown and Caldwell for landscaping and other improvements at Treatment Plant No. 2 estimated at $1,500,000. The landscaping work was added to this project in accordance with Coastal Commission Permit conditions. The Directors approved the plans and specifications for this work in August 1996. The Engineer's estimate for the combined work is $7.1 million. Addendum Nos. 1 and 2 made minor changes to the contract and added small amounts of miscellaneous work. The contract time was extended from 550 to 730 calendar days, scheduling requirements were revised and an extra week was added to the bid period. On October 15, 1996, 5 bids were received for the combined projects ranging from a high of$9,284,000 to a low of$7,122,693 submitted by Advanco Constructors. Staff recommends approval of Addendum Nos. 1 and 2 and award of the construction contract to the Contractor submitting the low bid. TMDAI c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J UPDOCV GENDAVWRS-9MOV0So1 Page 2 of 2 October 16, 1998 2:00 P.M. RID TARUI ATION o00 Job/Contract/Specification No.J-34-1 & P2-35-5 PROJECT TITLE: OCEAN DIITFAI I RFI IARII ITV IIPARADF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: .I-Ai1 A P2.19-R ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: 67.1 Mill* a ===emm�=�� em ==�vevee��neee�e� ee = ��neve�a �� vee TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID - -- ---- -- - - -- 1. ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS $7,122,693.00 2. SVERDRUP CIVIL, INC. $7,904,348.00 3. S.J. AMOROSO $8,247,000.00 4. MARGATE CONSTRUCTION $9,225,000.00 5. ZIEBARTH & ALPERS 89,284,000.00 8. 7. S. 9. 10. I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Advanco Constructors in the bid amount of $7,122,693.00 as the lowest and best bid. d; David A. Ludwin Director of Engineering JAW PDOCIENGU-34-11810TAB.M CSDOO 0 P.O.Box 8127 0 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 6 (714)962-2411 AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL a� MEETING DATE I°: DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initials of Otlginabr) OMITS: '"•'w :..`�i.."" _"..._ POD: 11(7/96 FAHR: \ : All 3720,John Dettle,5069 EXEC: LI„ r\ ',. STEER: -.- Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS:112Dta6 "''.,.... ." AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION($): Aaenda Wordina: JOB NO. J-11-2, RESTORATION OF OLD LABORATORY FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT The Director of Engineering requests an increase in authorized funds of$101,000.00, bringing the project total to $525,000 to cover all anticipated costs required to complete the project. Recommended Action(s): 1) Authorize funds in the amount of$525,000.00 for the Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed:6H496 Negative Declaration Approved on 6114/96 WSW BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $353,700 BUDGET AMOUNT TOZATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF EXPENDITURESSched gwl6eepmqus rnmrcrsl AMOUNT Item-C.1.Ee. $330,000 $49,467 $280,533 $525,000 AMOUN70F TRANSFER: AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED Art $424.000.00 $101,000.00 $525,000.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO It YES,slate number. Permanent UmXed Term II VES,ext, I.MADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRE! ES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA (List) ' W64A MINIM To Committee: Sig tum ate 1. Budget Information Table D' sion ge ( Desig Sig a[ Date To Jt. Bds.: Depa en � d( r 1. Budget Information Table O 2 R& nature D e Assistant General Manager (Or Designee) OMITS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date: _ Approved: Amended: - Forwarded to: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background and/or Summary) At the January 24, 1996 Board of Directors meeting, the Board approved a motion for Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department, Job No. J-11-2 and provided for funds in the amount of $375,000. The Board also authorized the budget amount of$150,000 for the Interior Asbestos Removal from Old Laboratory, Job No. J-11-1. This established a total budget for the conversion of the Old Laboratory of $525,000. In June 1996, staff presented to the POC Committee a request to approve plans and specifications for the Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources, Job No. J-11-2 and a motion authorizing a fund of $575,000 to cover all related costs to the project, including design, construction, administration, asbestos removal, termite extermination, office furniture, and moving expenses. The approval of plans and specifications was approved and staff was directed to take a closer look at the costs for this project and provide back up to support the budget. The PDC Committee and the Board did authorize $55,000 for design, permitting, asbestos removal and termite extermination. At the same Board meeting the 1996-1997 Budget was approved which only included $330,000 for the 1996-1997 fiscal year and a project total of$353,700. At the August 28, 1996 Board of Directors meeting the Board approved Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications, received and filed bids and awarded the construction contract for Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources, Job No. J-11-2 to Varkel Construction, Inc., in the total amount of$288,800. Staff presented a more defined Budget Information Table as requested by the PDC Committee based again on the original budget amount of$525,000. Staff did not, however, speclfically request an authorization of funds totaling $525,000. On October 24, 1996, the Boards of Directors authorized expenditure of$80,200 for the purchase of furnishings for the building. This request is to authorize $101,000 for consultant support during construction and staff costs for project management and construction inspection. See attached Budget Information Table for a breakdown of project costs. JD c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager J:\WPDOCIOETTLEU-11-2AIT Page 2 of 2 Revision: 82896 W BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Job No. J-11-2 Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department TASK BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED (ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURES % IN CORF) TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE COMPLETE FUNDS TO DATE Design Consultant $30,000 $32,555 $10,515 $43,070 $27,078 100% City Permit -0- $2,200 -0- $2,200 -0- -0- Construction $323,700 $288,800 -0- $288,800 -0- -0- Contractor Asbestos Removal -0- $15,745 ($2,000) $13,745 $13,745 100% Termite -0- $4,500 ($2,000) $2,500 $2,500 100% Extermination Furnishings -0- $80,200 -0- $80,200 -0- -0- Moving and -0- -0- $11,430 $11,430 $5,575 50% Hook Up Administration and -0- -0- $83,055 $83,055 $51,055 60% Inspection TOTAL $353,700 $424,000 $101,000 $525,000 $99,953 J'1W POOCOETTLEIEXAMPLE78L F 01 Btl AGENDA a o GOMM INFO I IT ITEM ❑ cavm,.nACTIONN¢Ent U JT BD CONSENT TRANSMITTAL IY JT.BD O SCUiSION ,p m (NONLONSENT) PUDLpIC HEARING e05 MT1 TING ORAL J1eDS,A4FNDA ITEMNO.: 111: f MEETING DATE T"SXT11 oMM.ID No DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION �(Inftlals of Originator) OMTB: MTS PDC: 11/7196FAHR: AIia —_ All 3720,Wendy Sevenandt,5058 EXEC:STEER: a Division Na,Name,and Extension JT.BD8:11/20196 ,,T. AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: ADDENDUM NO.4 TO MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1,JOB NO. Pl-40-1,AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO.2,JOB NO.P2.47.1 (All Districts):The Engineering Department and the Director of Engineering requests that the Professional Services Agreement With Lee 8 Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc.,he amended providing for additional engineering services for design changes. Recommended Action(s): Approve Addendum No.4 to Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $244,277.00 for a total amount not to exceed$1,492,244.OD. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: YES DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Dale Notice of Exemption Filed: 12115M 9/25/96 BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO4DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $23,918,000 BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: DORF EXPENDITURES Rwlauaee,pluaTnnelsl Schedule/Line llam:8.1,A.5.e,A.5.a.,B.5A.,B.4.a.AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: $650,000 $15,000 $835,000 $23,918,000 Schedule/Line Item: AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT $1,160,000.00 $87,967.00 $244.277.00 $1,492,244.00 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REOUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,aUle number: _Permanent _Limited Term II YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION secUen CONCURRENC ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) Jh a o Q(> To Committee: 1. Budget Information Table gnat a[e ivisio M er r Desi e) /L Signatur Date To JL Bds.: 1. Budget Information Table Depa e t r D sl ne ) Signature Date Assistant General Manager (Or Designee) OMITS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMNL -- Meeting Date: Approved. Amended: Forwarded to: ' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background IuWar Summary) In December 1993, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., for the design of Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems and Process Evaluations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Jobs Nos. Pl-40-1 and P2-47-1. This project is for studies and the preparation of plans and specifications for twenty-three miscellaneous tasks. In addition to the twenty-three tasks, the scope of work includes the design of the Rehabilitation of Digesters I, J. K, L. M. N, and 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39. Of the 23 miscellaneous tasks, three tasks are complete. The remaining twenty tasks have design memoranda completed. The design memorandum for Job No. P2-39 is also complete. During the review of the design memoranda by Districts' staff, additional criteria have been identified that need to be incorporated into the design. Incorporating the criteria into the design is beyond the work identified in the Consultant's scope of work. Further design on the 23 miscellaneous tasks has not proceeded pending the approval of this addendum. The consultant has developed the plans and specifications to the 50% design level for Job No. P2-39. The work added by this addendum will be incorporated into the 75% plans and specifications. The changes to the Consultant's scope of work are itemized below and summarized in the table that follows. JOB NO. P1-40-1 ITEM 1 A design memorandum was developed for the automated backwash of the trickling filters and the replacement of trickling filter recirculation pumps at Plant No. 1. This design memo is combined with a task for the rehabilitation of the trickling filter media and structural repairs. Subsequent to the completion of the draft design memorandum, the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation (OCR) Project Feasibility Study was completed. This OCR Project has a direct impact on the fate of the trickling filters. Major modifications to the trickling filters should be postponed and implemented only if recommended in the Strategic Plan. This item will delete the development of plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of the trickling filters. The work remaining for Lee & Ro will be to make revisions to the design memo and submit the final design memorandum. ITEM 2 A design memorandum was developed to assess the impact of altematives for handling waste flows from the belt filter presses on the level of nitrogen in the secondary effluent reclaimed by the Orange County Water District. The Consultant would prepare a design for the most feasible J:WOPDOC%GENDANITS-98wOVV`l4 1NAD4 Page 2 of 6 Redsion:1021M alternative to reduce the level of nitrogen in the secondary effluent while minimizing retreatment of these waste flows. Subsequent to the completion of the draft design memorandum, the Orange County Regional Water Reclamation (OCR) Project Feasibility Study was completed. This OCR Project has a direct impact on the treatment of nitrogen at Plant No. 1. The Strategic Plan will address the OCR Project and nitrogen treatment. The recommendations for the handling of waste flows from the filter presses and nitrogen management is an important part of the Strategic Plan. Design and construction of any alternatives should be postponed and implemented as recommended in the Strategic Plan. This item will delete the development of plans and specifications for facilities to improve filtrate routing and nitrogen management. The work remaining for Lee & Ro will be to make minor revisions and submit the final design memorandum. JOB NO. P2-47-1 ITEM 3 The activated sludge control system at Plant No. 2 is outdated and replacement parts are unavailable. The Consultant's task is to recommend and design replacement of the process controllers and field mounted instruments. During the preparation of the design memorandum, the control philosophy changed from an older technology to the use of a programmable logic controller (PLC). Additionally, the design of the Plant No. 2 Secondaries Control Systems Upgrades, Job No. J-31-4, was initiated with CH2M-Hill to replace the existing controllers with a PLC. This item is to revise the design for the activated sludge plant control system at Plant No. 2 to PLC based control. Lee & Ro will design the field mounted instrument replacement while coordinating with the CH2M-Hill design for the installation of a new PLC. Deficiencies in the wiring between field mounted instruments and the PLC, safety devices and alarms were recognized. This item adds the replacement of associated wiring to meet current codes. ITEM 4 The Districts are committed to follow the recommendations of the National Fire Protection Association for fire protection in our wastewater treatment and collection facilities. Thus, a task was included in this project to evaluate and design improvements to bring the Gas Compressor Facility at Plant No. 2 into compliance with this code. Subsequently, another project was started to evaluate all the facilities and areas within the treatment plants. Staff agreed to shift the upgrades to the Gas Compressor Facility to this second project and delete the work from Lee & Re's project. This item will delete the development of plans and specifications for upgrades to the Gas Compressor Facility. ITEM 5 Instruments exist at the effluent termination channel to measure the depth of the effluent in the main channel and two overflow channels. Based on the levels measured, a complex system with redundant level measuring devices controls the pumps at the Ocean Outfall Booster Pump Station (OOBS)and emergency pumps at Foster Pump Station. These instruments are tied into a level measurement system at OOBS. The control system at GOBS is currently undergoing modifications through the GOBS Control System Retrofit, Job No. J-31-2. The Consultant's scope is to upgrade the instruments at the effluent termination channel. This item revises the design to include revisions to the complete control system based upon details provided by the O&M Electrical and Instrumentation Divisions. The design will also be revised to incorporate modifications implemented by Job No. J-31-2. JAWPDOCWGENDA14ms-96NOW14D.1 KAN Page 3 of 6 Reisim 10/21M ITEM 6 The current scope is to design fault protection for a primary effluent pump which is on a common electrical bus with the oxygen generation compressors at Plant No. 2. Subsequent electrical studies identified that the starting of a oxygen generation compressor causes a voltage loss in the main bus. This voltage loss in turn causes the shutdown of the primary effluent pump. With the source of the pump failure identified, a design change is required. This item revises the design to provide soft-start motor starters for the oxygen generation compressors at Plant No. 2 which will eliminate the voltage loss in the main bus. ITEM 7 The current scope is to provide two existing electrical power distribution buildings at Plant No. 2 with air conditioning to reduce the corrosion. This item adds a third existing electrical power distribution building to the scope of work. Operations and Maintenance has requested that providing air conditioning to this third building be expedited. Engineering can support this request by including the task in Lee & Ro's scope of work. ITEM 8 A design memorandum was developed recommending two alternatives to provide a redundant power feed to the Plant Water Pump Station (PWPS). The O&M Electrical Division preferred the second alternative which entails out of scope work. The extra work includes the addition of power back up from the existing emergency generators and replacement of a 20 year old Motor Control Center(MCC). This item revises the design to implement the recommendations requested by the Electrical Division ITEM 9 The task to provide redundant power feed to the PWPS will make available a transformer that can be utilized for the replacement of a PCB transformer at Power Building "B". Additionally, recent electrical studies have identified deficient circuit breakers in an MCC at Power Building "B". This item revises the design to use the transformer removed from PWPS to replace the PCB transformer. This item also adds the replacement of deficient circuit breakers in MCC "SL"at Power Building "B". ITEM 10 Currently, a primary clarifier with the capacity of 12 million gallons per day (mgd) is dedicated solely for the purpose of settling 3-4 mgd of waste flows from the belt filter presses. A design memorandum evaluated options to return this clarifier to primary settling. Operations prefers the alternative to provide a smaller settling basin for these waste flows. The permanent siting of a new settling basin will be considered in the overall recommendations for new facilities in the current Strategic Plan. A temporary settling basin is requested by Operations until the recommendations of the Strategic Plan are implemented. This item will change the design from a permanent to a temporary facility. JOB NO. P2-39 ITEM 11 A thorough review of the design memorandum for the Rehabilitation of Digesters at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-39 was conducted. Eight specific design changes were identified to meet requirements of the Operations and Maintenance Division and to keep pace with changes being implemented by the Plant Automation Group. These design changes are summarized below: a. Move a PLC from Digesters R&S to the Dissolved Air Flotation (OAF) area. This PLC controls the DAFs and Thickened Waste Activated Sludge (TWAS) functions. b. Replace four Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) in the Dewatering Control Room that are old and require high maintenance. These VFDs transfer sludge from holding digesters to sludge loading. The Consultant must prepare a detailed construction sequence and equipment layout. J9WPDOCNGENDANITS.% ONP140-1N.AD4 Page 4 of Revision:1021M ' c. Replace MCC "M" at Digesters I &J which is old and components are no longer manufactured for this MCC . Additionally, Maintenance can no longer get replacement parts for this MCC. d. Upgrade the pressure and level controls for each digester with transmitters, power supplies, cabling and local indicators. e. Replace level controls at the Ferric Chloride tank and put the signals on the data highway. f. Revise the design to install one flow meter in the pump room for each pair of digesters. g. Develop plans and specifications for a small construction contract to feed TWAS to Digesters "F" and "G". This would require piping, pneumatic valves, instrument air piping, remote input/output (RIO) panel, and control connection through the RIO panel to a PLC at Digesters "W and "S". This work would be expedited and constructed prior to the larger digester rehabilitation contract. h. Change all coaxial cable and twisted pair signal wiring to fiber optic network. The fiber optic network is currently being installed by the Plant Automation Group. Connect all RIOs for all digesters to CP-DIG with fiber optic cable. This item adds the eight changes to the Consultant's scope of work. PROJECT DELAYS (Job Nos. P1-40-1, P2-47-1 and P2-39) ITEM 12 The PSA was awarded in December 1993 with a scheduled completion of plans and specifications in June 1995. During that time frame, the Consultant completed the design memoranda and submitted these to the Districts for review. In December of 1994, the design of the miscellaneous tasks were placed on hold due to the bankruptcy, while work on the 12kV Distribution System and the Digester Rehabilitation continued. The preparation of plans and specifications incorporating the scope changes are now scheduled to be complete by December 1997. This delay adds 2 Y:years to the original schedule. Project delays increase the quantity of project management services required over the course of the project. These services include meetings, interfacing between the Districts and the Consultant, maintaining files, restarting work following delays, and handling invoices. This item adds additional services of project management over the extended schedule. In summary, a total increase in the Consultant's PSA of$244,277 is requested for the design changes, task deletions, and project delays which increases the contract amount from $1,247,967 to $1,492,244. The cost for each of the referenced items are shown in the Table titled Summary of Scope of Work Changes. Item 12 is divided evenly among the three jobs for cost accounting purposes. At this time, staff is seeking authorization for additional design costs. Construction cost changes are shown on the Summary of Scope of Work Changes table for information only. The added design costs are within the adopted CORF budget as shown on the Budget Information Table. J:\WPOOGAGENDAWITS-96WOVIP1-Q-1N.AD4 Page 5 of Revision:100196 SUMMARY OF SCOPE OF WORK CHANGES " JOB NOJ ITEM DESCRIPTION DESIGN COST CONSTRUCTION CHANGE COST CHANGE JOB NO. P1-40-1': ITEM 1 Delete preparation of plans and specifications for ($55,541) ($2,175,000) Trickling Filter System Upgrades ITEM 2 Delete preparation of plans and specifications for ($23,333) ($1,000,000) Filtrate Routing and Nitrogen Management ITEM 12 Project Delays $22,706 $0 SUBTOTAL ($56,168) ($3,175,000) JOB NO. P2-47-1 ITEM 3 Revise the design for Activated Sludge Plant Control $63.595 $260,000 System ITEM 4 Delete preparation of plans and specificafions for Gas ($21,861) ($680,000) Compressor Building upgrades to code ITEM 5 Revise the design for outfall level controls $26,094 $100,000 ITEM 6 Revise the design for motor starter improvements at $17,774 $175,000 12kV Distribution Center"B" ITEM 7 Design ventilation upgrades for a third electrical $21,673 $50,000 building ITEM 8 Revise the design of the Plant Water Pump Station $32,940 $100,000 electrical upgrades ITEM 9 Revise the design of electrical upgrades at Power $9.310 $20.000 Building "B" ITEM 10 Revise the design of the filtrate clarifier to be a $0 ($450,000) temporary unit ITEM 12 Project Delays $22,706 $0 SUBTOTAL $172,231 ($425,000) JOB NO. P2-39 ITEM 11 Revise the design of the Digester Rehabilitation to $105,507 $1.000,000 incorporate seven design changes ITEM 12 Project delays $22,707 $0 SUBTOTAL $128,214 $1,000,000 TOTAL $244,277 1 ($2,600,000) WTS:jmf c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager JAWPDOCWGENDAWITS-96WOV1P140.1 N.AD4 Page 6 of 6 Revision:10/21/96 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE PROJECT?ASK BUDGET FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED (ADOPTED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPEDITURES % BY CORF) TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZED TO DATE COMPLETE FUNDS TO DATE JOB NO.P137: DESIGN $300,000 $217,087 $0 $217.087 $120,000 65 CONST, $4,000.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 STAFF $500.000 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $40,000 SUBTOTAL $4.800.000 $717,087 $0 $717,087 $160,000 JOB NO.PI.40-1 Rams 1,2, 12 DESIGN $500,000 $282,476 ($56,168) $226,308 $95.000 35 CONST. $5,228,000 $0 $0 $0 s0 a STAFF $600.000 $600,000 $0 $600.000 $35,000 SUBTOTAL $6,328,000 $882.476 ($56,168) $826,308 $130,000 JOB NO.P2-47.1: Items 3-10,12 DESIGN $410,000 $215,444 $172,231 $387,675 $99.000 35 CONST. $2,270,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 STAFF $190.000 $200.000 $0 $200,000 $26,000 SUBTOTAL $2,870.000 $415.444 $172,231 $687.675 $125,000 JOB NO.P2-39 Items 11,12 DESIGN $1,000,000 $532,960 $128,214 $861,174 $265,000 70 CONST. $8,520.000 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 0 STAFF $400,000 $400.000 $0 $400,000 $110,000 SUBTOTAL $9.920,000 $932,960 $128,214 $1,061,174 $375,000 •PSA,COMBINED "S fi #Nxi. DESIGN $2.210.000 $1.247,967 $244,277 $1,492.244 $579,000 CONST. $20,018.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 STAFF $1,690.000 $1,700,000 $0 $1,7D0,000 $211,000 PROJECT TOTAL $23.918,000 $2,947,967 $244.277 $3,192,244 $790,000 J:1W PDOCAGENDAWITS4MONPI-Q-I.TBL o e Poreas.au enN , ,� � : AGENDA V o `gw+ry ar� J � "g" .0ITEM n t�eoscoNSENT y � � 1 ), TRANSMITTAL ------ mm ❑ PV@UgtfpARBW. ' ° I€ � �x'' r� tl JY aD8';AStaNOAfrB41i0- � -y - MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (InNels of Originalo0 OMITS: PDC: 1117/96 via FAHR: 3790,Bud Palmquist, 5132 EXEC: ftj: 5&6 STEER: ' .a DMeim No.,Na..and Etlension JT.BDS: 1120/96 t�S._•rvw-�7i. AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO CONTRACT 5-37-3 WITH WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, PHASE 3: The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 4, providing ten items of additional work. Recommended Action(s): Approve Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. 5-37-3 with Wal-Con Construction Company for an addition of $204,943.00, increasing the total contract amount to$2,645,401.03. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NO DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Final EIR Approved w 7/19M and Notice of Determination Netl on 7121e9 327/96 BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR•TOJMTE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $2.946,000.00 BUDGETAMOUNT TOMATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: DISTRICTS 586 C.I.P. EXPENDITURES a., T^ .) $250,000 $60.000 $190,000 $2,946,000 AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AR $1,985,000.00 $455.458.03 1 $204,943.00 $2,641,401.03 WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO C01 C RREENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(Ust) �-'� To Committee: 1. Change Order No.4 ature Date Ivisio ge Or De ' e) Ignatu Date To Jt. Bds.: 1. Signed Change Order No.4 Depa t q D 'gn 9 Signature Iale Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Backgrwr aM w Summary) Contract No. 5-37-3, Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Main Replacement, consists of replacing the old 30-inch sewer with a new 36-inch and 30-inch vitrified Gay pipe (VCP) gravity sewer and appurtenances in Pacific Coast Highway from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Arches (Newport Boulevard) and modifications of connecting City of Newport Beach sewers to Bayside Drive trunk sewer for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6. In addition, gravity sewers and appurtenances and abandonment of a pump station in Balboa Boulevard for the City of Newport Beach. The following is a summary of the contract: Original Contract Price $1,985,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 455,458.03 This Change(Add)(Beduct) $ 204,943.00 Change Orders to Date $ 660,401.03 Percentage Increase $ 33.27% Amended Contract Price $2,645,401.03 Note: Change Order No. 4 does not include the potential cost impact for compensable delays. These costs are now being negotiated with Wal-Con Construction Company. If agreement cannot be reached, a dispute resolution process may have to be initiated. The following table summarizes the Change Order. For additional details on individual items, see the attached Chan a Order: ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DAYS TYPE NO. 1 Over width paving on Pacific Coast Highway $20,300 3 Changed Conditions 2 Undisclosed and inaccurately plotted utilities 38,458 15 Changed Conditions 3 Delay due to heavy traffic volume 4,250 1 Other 4 Installation of gas collection pipeline and related 16,951' 8 Other work(CSDOC) 5 Removal of undisclosed rock, concrete 4.686 3 Changed Conditions encasement, at al. 6 Modification of forcemain relocation 23,300 7 Omission 7 Escalation of labor rates 7,469 0 Other 8 Modifications to truck landing pad 4,588 3 Design Change 9 Overtime premium to accelerate City work 10,000 0 Other 10 Change in conditions for City scope of work 74,941" 18 Changed Conditions TOTAL -Change Order No. 4 $204,943 1 58 All of the items would have been included in the scope of the original contract if discovered or known in the design phase. NOTES:*This is the Districts' portion only, see Item No. 10A for the City of Newport Beach's portion. "City of Newport Beach to reimburse the Districts per agreement. BP:Idh c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager JAW PDOCT NG617-3 W IT-FORM Revision: BrAM ' Y Page 1 of 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduet) $ 204 943.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -OVER WIDTH BASE PAVING AND OVERLAY ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY(CSDOC CHANGE OF CONDITION ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY) This item is to remove and replace approximately 1600 square feet of paving over existing telephone line trench located just outside the Districts mainline trench. The failed street sections in this area had only 44nches of asphalt over an improperly compacted Class II base between Station Nos. 36+90 to 53+73. Between Station Nos.52+73 to 55+53 on Pacific Coast Highway there were several weak street structural sections just outside the trench zone that failed when the shields were pulled and heavy equipment loads were placed on these sections. The Contractor charged only for asphalt material in these failed areas. In Change Order No.2, Item No.6 and Change Order No.3, Item No.5,reference was made to costs incurred to remove and replace asphalt concrete pavement outside the contract trench limits during mainline construction. The above change order items covered only the base paving for the over width trench. This change order Rem includes the grinding and placing the cap for these areas(Bitter Point Pump Station crossing and between Station Nos. 10+22 and 14+75. At various locations between Station Nos. 14+75 to 60+18 the Contractor was required to perform over width paving due to the poor structural street cross sections in adjacent existing utility trenches. These poor structural street sections could not sustain the loads from the heavy equipment movement and the pulling of the box shields. The majority of the extra costs in the above reaches were for grinding and capping in the over width areas. This Rem of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference FCO No.7. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $20,300.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER REM: 3 Calendar Days Page 2 of 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project, City of Newport Beach. Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 2-UNDISCLOSED AND INACCURATELY PLOTTED UTILITIES ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY FCO LOCATION DESCRIPTION JUSTIFICATION COST #8 Sta.25+25 Remove and replace an undisclosed 24inch Not shown on the $ 1,854. storm drain contract documents #12 Sta.31+17 Cut and remove an abandoned and undisclosed Not shown on the $ 835. 8-inch VCP sewer inside a 12-inch steel casing, contract documents Contractor incurred delay. #13 PCH & Temporary and permanent repairs to an Not shown on the $13,984. Superior undisclosed traffic signal conduit that was not contract documents shown on the contract documents(main power feed to the intersection). Temp. repairs to a traffic signal conduit routed Incorrectly marked on to a signal located on a median island. the contract documents. Delay encountered for an undisclosed 14nch Not marked on the gas line. contract documents. #14 Sta. Nos. Remove,cut and plug three utilities that Not shown on the $5.740. 39+65 to 39+95 were undisclosed and abandoned;a 104nch contract dcouments. steel oil line at Sta. No. 39+82,64nch steel pipe in an 184nch VCP encasement,and a 24-inch storm drain at Sta.No.39+95. #17 Sta. 57+45 Repair of an undisclosed 14nch street light Inaccurately marked $4,763. conduit. When the line was hit during utility. excavation it was pulled outside the trench zone which required additional concrete sawcutting. #22 Ste. Nos. An electrical duct bank was in direct conflict Inaccurately marked $5,219. 59+48 to 60+48 with new 30-inch VCP. SCE would not allow utility. the removal of the concrete encasement to provide enough clearance.The contractor used a VCP manufactured reducer and changed the pipe size to 27-inch in this reach to the tio4n point at the new manhole. Y Page 3 of 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Proiect. City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 2-(Continued) #28 Various Misc. change of conditions along mainline: Not shown on $6.063. locations Contractor raised monitoring well cover to contract drawings; along grade that was to be performed by others; Work that was to mainline removed an abandoned and undisclosed be performed by 18-inch sewer in a 30-inch steel casing that others. was 8-inches into design grade of a new 304nch VCP sewer line (Sta.55+60); remove and replace an undisclosed 244nch star drain (Sta.No.38+20);Contractor replaced 244nch blind flange in a 364nch FM manway that was to be performed by others(Sta. No.33+00); removed an undisclosed and abandoned 6-inch steel line (Sta. No.60+18). This Rem was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference FCO's above. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $38,458.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 15 Calendar Days ITEM 3-STANDBY TIME FOR HEAVY TRAFFIC VOLUME AND BAD WEATHER CONDITIONS ON SOUTH BOUND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Due to a severe backup in traffic for the south bound lanes on Pacific Coast Highway from Superior to Orange,the Contractor was directed to suspend his pipeline installation work and restore traffic to two southbound lanes. This condition was attributed to Contractor's construction activities at the intersection of Superior and PCH that reduced the southbound traffic flow to one lane. The problems with the traffic flows were compounded by the heavy rains. During the suspension period, Caltrans reset the traffic signals to allow for a longer green sequence for southbound traffic. The Contractor was compensated for standby time for equipment and crews during the delay. This Rem of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)l(b) of the General Provisions. Reference FCO No.9. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,250.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Days Page 4 of 11 Q COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20. 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 471h Street Pump Station Proied, City of Newport Beach Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 4-INSTALLATION OF GAS COLLECTION PIPELINE AND RELATED WORK ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY ADJACENT TO HOAG HOSPITAL. (CSDOC RESPONSIBLE FOR 50% PER AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH) The change of condition for this change order item was initiated by the City of Newport Beach via a letter to the Districts on March 25, 1996. The City requested that CSDOC install a 44nch PVC schedule 40 gas collection pipeline between Station 48+50 and Station 54+00 as part of the Districts sewer project. This letter stated that payment for the change order would be shared equally. Exploratory borings in the area adjacent to Hoag Hospital indicated that concentrations of methane and hydrogen sulfide represented extremely dangerous conditions that were potentially explosive and toxic. For public health and safety reasons the District directed the Contractor to install approximately 550 feet of 4-inch wrapped,slotted PVC pipe in the Districts mainline trench,and fie-in the 4- inch gas recovery pipeline into the Hoag Hospital's gas extraction system,including the installation of in-line flow valves(Methane and H2S valves.) To construct the above gas recovery pipeline the Contractor incurred additional change in condition costs and they are summarized as follows(major cost items): Directed to locate City methane gas vent line and make repairs;Contractor retained CTL environmental services to perform soil gas probes, laboratory analysis,report preparation, etc.;installed additional vapor barrier to seal off the gas that was following the pipe trench; performed additional exploration work to investigate methane and hydrogen sulfide gas levels;due to the methane gas following the excavation the Contractor incurred delays and lost production;saw cut street section to locate City gas lines and removed asphalt and concrete pavement at various locations (outside the mainline trench);per City's direction, Contractor assisted City driller to install test holes, locate existing methane gas recovery line in sidewalk adjacent to Hoag Hospital, remove a crushed plastic gas pipe under the sidewalk and excavated and replaced approximately 220 square feet of sidewalk. This hem of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference FCO No. 11. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $16,951.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 Calendar Days ITEM 5-REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED ROCK CONCRETE ENCASEMENT,TIMBERS AND ABANDONED UTILITY STRUCTURE The Contractor removed abandoned traffic controller concrete slab(12'x10'x15')that was not shown on the contract drawings(Sta.No.28+33);removed undisclosed rock with a 235 hammer(6'x10'x3) and had to break additional rock behind the shields and replace voids with slurry(PCH and Balboa);and removed undisclosed rock, Umbers and concrete around a new City manhole to be built at Sta.No.9+87. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. Reference FCO Nos, 10, 15, and 19. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,686.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days 4 Page 5 of 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3 and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 6-REMOVE AND RE-CONFIGURE AN EXISTING 244NCH FORCE MAIN RELOCATION During excavation for the relocation of an existing 244nch force main as shown on Sheet 8 of 18 of the contract documents and Detail 5 on Sheet 9 of 18,the Contractor found that the field layout was completely different from what was shown on the contract drawings. On three separate occasions the Contractor had to open up the excavation to perform the following:reset the shields to match the reconfiguration,to survey the existing layout to order new pipe and fittings,and to coordinate with Maintenance to arrange for the isolation of the force main system. During this period of time the Contractor incurred extra costs for shield rental, labor to open and secure excavation and lost production and delay costs. Approximately 50 percent of the costs for this change order Rem was for material costs for new pipe and fittings required to match the revised pipe configuration. The Contract drawings indicated to reuse the existing flange to flange fittings,but they were not ganged. The joints were restrained with a mega-lug system and were in very poor condition. In addition the majority of the fittings could not have been reused due to the revised layout. The Contractor was required to protect in-place an existing cable TV line that interfered with the new piping to be installed. R had to be stretched to provide enough clearance. Over width paving had to be performed due to the modified piping layout(additional 9-feet was added to the pit width requiring 122 tons of asphalt). This Rem of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference FCO No.21. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $23,300.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Day ITEM 7-INCREASE IN LABOR COSTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 12 In reference to Change Order No. 1, Item No.2,dated July 26, 1996,titled'Added escalation costs and time extensions due to delay in issuance of notice to proceed". In this change order Rem R stated that..'the increase in labor costs due to the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 12 is unknown at this time. Their contract expires on June 30, 1995 and a new contract has not been negotiated at this Rem, Therefore,this increase must be handled in a future change order". This change order Rem reflects the total escalated labor costs for the IUOP Local 12 contract from July 1, 1995 through the period ending July 20, 1996. This Rem of work was accomplished by farce account pursuant to Section 1D-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. Reference FCO No.23. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,469.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 6 of 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Protect. City of Newport Beach Contract No 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Ennineering Corporation ITEM 8-REVISE TRUCK LANDING PAD DESIGN TO IMPROVE LONG TERM MAINTENANCE The contract documents indicate a gravel landing pad(60'x20)that was designed using an&inch lift of 14nch gravel with redwood headers. During construction a decision was made to improve the long term maintenance of the pad by modifying the crass-section to include 4-inches of asphalt over 64nches of aggregate base and change the layout to include an additional manhole. The new layout better matched the existing topography by relocating the pad away from the toe of a slope. The majority of the extra costs is for 22-feet of curb and gutter,23 tons of AR4000 asphalt, extending the driveway depression and additional labor for excavation and removal. This Rem of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. Reference FCO No.24 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,588.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days ITEM 9-OVERTIME PREMIUM TO ACCELERATE THE WORK ON BALBOA PRIOR TO THE JULY 4TH HOLIDAY(CSDOC RESPONSIBLE FOR 50%PER AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH) The Contractor was directed to accelerate his contract work on Balboa to comply with a request by the City of Newport Beach to be completely off the street prior to the 4th of July weekend. There were no provisions in the City of Newport Beach encroachment permit nor in the detail specifications(traffic regulations and schedule sections)that would have prohibited the Contractor from wonting through the 4th of July holiday time frame. The only time restriction contained in the contract documents was for working hours on Balboa and the Contractor would not work on Pacific Coast Highway during the ThanksgMng and Christmas holiday time frame. Therefore, to accommodate the general public.R was considered mutually beneficial to allow the Districts contractor to work overtime between June 11,1996 to June 27, 1996(13 working days). This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuantto Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference FCO No.25. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10.000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 7 of 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Protect City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Enoineerinp Corporation ITEM 10-CHANGE IN CONDITIONS FOR THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SCOPE OF WORK ON BALBOA BOULEVARD AND BAYSIDE DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENTS A. Installation of pas pipe line and related work on Pacific Coast Highway adjacent to Hoag Hospital (City of Newport Beach responsible for 50% per agreement with CSDOC).Reference Item No.4 of this change order for a narrative description of this change of condition. $16,951.00 B. Over width base paving on Balboa Boulevard. The Contractor was directed to perform over width base paving at various location on Balboa Boulevard. This was attributed to the poor structural subgrade of the street,requiring the Contractor to repair and replace sections,that in some locations had only 2-inches of asphalt base. In addition, Balboa Boulevard's existing street section was built over an old concrete roadway thereby creating a situation where failures occurred at the cold joints(asphalUconcrete interface),heavy equipment loads contributed to the fractures that occurred at the cold joint locations. $8,600.00 C. Design profile grade of 36-inch force main that was to be relocated as shown on Sheet No. 3 of 5, Detail No.4 was in direct conflict with the City's new 12inch VCP sewer line. The City's 124nch line crossed the 22.5 degree bend fitting for the 364nch force main at a 33 degree angle versus the 90 degree shown on the contract drawings,thereby not allowing enough clearance to install per design. To install the 364nch force main below the 124nch VCP line would not have been cost effective due to the rack interference at that depth (4-feet deeper than the 124nch VCP line) and the high ground water level in this area,that would have required 24-hour per day pumping. In addition,a telephone and an electrical utility interfered with the installation of the City's new 124nch VCP line in this vicinity,forcing the Contractor to modify the alignment to provide sufficient clearance(telephone line 40-feet off mark). The extra cost associated with this change order item was for slurry used in lieu of contract backfill material to protect the structural integrity of the force main due to its closer proximity to street grade and over width conditions; slowed production;removal of interfering portion of an undisclosed encasement for an abandoned 244nch D.I.P.line in order to set shields, re-excavation costs and survey and layout work to modify alignment of City's 124nch VCP sewer crossing the District's force main (part of City plans). $7,000.00 D. Overtime Premium to accelerate the work on Balboa Boulevard prior to the July 4, 1996 holiday (City of Newport Beach responsible for 50% per agreement with CSDOC). Reference Item No. 9 of this change order for a narrative description of this Rem. $10,000.00 Page 8 of 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Proiect, City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 10-(Cont) E. Removal of undisclosed concrete,debris,concrete piers and slurry in voided areas. At Balboa and 46th Street,the Contractor had to jackhammer out an undisclosed concrete pier,remove a City water line kicker that interfered with the removal and installation of a new City manhole, place slurry due to the removal of concrete,timber,debris,etc.that caused an over width trench condition. At various other locations along Balboa the Contractor placed slurry to fill the voids caused by the removal of undisclosed rock, concrete,timber.etc. (over width trench conditions). $5,490.00 F. Installation of additional service laterals and the modifications and repairs to City utilities.The City of Newport Beach requested District Contractor to install two (2)additional 4-inch service laterals at Balboa and Rivers Street and Balboa and 45th Street. These laterals could not be installed at the bid amount due to the high ground water level,hand digging requirement, and to protect utilities in-place. At Balboa and 46th Street, due to the removal, repair,and reinstallation of an existing City water line the Contractor incurred extra costs for delays, paving and rock base, required to build a new City manhole. The City requested that two wye's be installed for future service connections, but subsequently changed their minds, requiring the Contractor to reexcavate and plug. At Balboa and 45th Street,during installation of a new City manhole the Contractor was directed to remove and replace two local sewer lines that were cracked just outside the shields and install new couplings. $13,000.00 G. Utility conflicts for abandoned, undisclosed and mismarked City utilities. The Contractor had to hand dig around a mismarked electrical line located in the center of the City's new 124nch VCP sewer line trench and protect in-place(PCH and Balboa). Just beyond the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Balboa,the Contractor encountered a utifay conflict with an encased electrical duct during the installation of the Citys 124nch line. The Contractor could not use trench shields,experienced production delays and high ground water problems. Al Bayside Site D location,an existing pole to be relocated by others was not performed, resulting in the Contractor incurring standby time to allow the City time to make a decision on the realignment of a new 64nch VCP City sewer line to be installed. At Bayside Drive Site A,the Contractor had to change pipe size from 84nch to 6-inch to avoid utility conflicts with two 24nch electrical lines that were not shown on the contract drawings and a 24nch waterline. In addition,during installation of a 84nch VCP City sewer line,the Contractor was required to tunnel by hand under other utilities and the curb(could not use excavator)and at Balboa and Rivers,the Contractor encountered abandoned and undisclosed utilities(84nch waterline and 44nch electric line)adjacent to a new City manhole to be built. The Contractor was delayed until a decision was made to resolve the interference problem. As a result the Contractor was committed to work overtime to complete the construction of the new manhole and related work(the pump station was shut down to allow adjacent lines to remain dry). $11,000.00 Page 9 of 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272MI27 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of Newport Beach, Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation ITEM 10 -(Cont.) H. Installation of two new City service laterals on Pacific Coast Highway. At the request of the City, the Contractor was directed to install two 44nch service laterals from new City manholes at Station Nos.33+69 and 34+68(part of the new 8anch City sewer line)to a pointjust beyond the curb line. This was not shown in the contract drawings. Both of these laterals required hand digging around an existing force main. $2,900.00 I. Credit for contract work not performed on Balboa Boulevard. The City of Newport Beach directed the District's Contractor to suspend the balance of his contract work on Balboa on approximately July 31, 1966 and return in mid-September. The City and the District's Contractor reached an agreement on a negotiated credit for the balance of the City work not completed. The credit primarily included deductions for traffic loops,grinding,traffic control and asphalt final cap. This credit in the amount of$14,500.00 will appear in the Change Order covering the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities(Change Order No.5) These items of work were accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. Reference FCO Nos. 7, 11, 16, 18,25,26,27, and 28. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $74,941.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 18 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $204,943.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 58 Calendar Days Page 10 of 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project. City of Newport Beach Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. 0 is therefore mutually agreed that 58 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order,but that no director indirect,incidental or consequential costs,expenses,losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date.' August 1, 1995 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: January 27, 1996 Time Extension this C.O.: 58 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 202 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 382 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 17, 1996 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable 'The original contract date was February 7, 1995. The'Notice to Proceed'was dated August 1, 1995 due to the bankruptcy. Original Contract Price $1.985,000.00 Prev.Authonzed Changes $ 455,458.03 This Change(Add)(Bednet) $ 204,943.00 Amended Contract Price $2,645,401.03 1 Page 11 of 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"EWS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Wal-Con Construction Company C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 20, 1996 Job: Replacement of Pack Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3. and Balboa Boulevard Sewer Replacement and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Protect. City of Newoort Beach. Contract No. 5-37-3 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Board Authorization Date:November 20, 1996 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA S itted by: Reviewed by: onstruction Manager Date Engineering anager Date �ppa,,�,da7 App ved to Form: L ,0 �� o Director of Engineering Date General ounsel Date Accepted by: WAL-CON CONSTRIJ TION COMPANY ontractor Date ' County Sanitation Districts Of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 DRAFT MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Wednesday, November 13, 1996, 5,30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, Califomia was held on November 13, 1996 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: George Brown, Chair Donald F. McIntyre, General Manager John J. Collins, Joint Chair Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager Jan Debay Mike Peterman, Director of Human Resources Burnie Dunlap Gary Streed, Director of Finance James Flora Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance John M. Gullixson Michelle Tuchman, Director of Communications Wally Linn Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Thomas Saltarelli Mike White, Controller Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chair Linda Eisman, Training Manager William G. Steiner Greg Mathews, Principal Admin. Analyst Peer Swan, Vice Joint Chair Marc Dubois, Contracts/Purchasing Manager Linda Heller, Purchasing Division Secretary Committee Directors Absent : Lenora Crane, Committee Secretary John C. Cox, Jr. (PJC) Others Present: Other Directors Present: Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Russ Patton, MOU Consultant None Susan Cotton, Money Matters Chuck Acocello, Moreland &Associates Mike Moreland, Moreland &Associates Kristie Thomas, Moreland &Associates Ruthann Moomey, Callan Associates, Inc. APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments were made. J Minutes of Finance, Admin, and Human Resources Committee Page 2 V November 13, 1996 APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the October 9, 1996 meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Chair advised that Director Collins had a few items to report. Director Collins updated the Committee on two issues: • Director Collins and Nancy Wheatley met with SAWPA regarding the terms of the proposed agreement with them. SAWPA represents several wastewater collection agencies east of us. The agreement will go before the Joint Boards in the near future. • A few weeks ago LAFCO had an item on their agenda to restructure the Districts. After contacting them regarding this issue, they have reconsidered and will give the Districts some time to reorganize on our own. The Districts have until late Spring to follow up with them on this issue. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER The General Manager indicated he would be reporting to the Committee in closed session on the status of the disciplinary actions which are the result of the recent workplace investigations. REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION The Assistant General Manager of Administration reported last month that revenues were about $2 million below budget projections. After investigation, she has found the following: • Property Taxes There has been a decrease in revenue from property taxes, due to an increase in the assessment appeals process. Assessed valuation continues to be relatively flat. Districts 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11 all had decreases in assessed valuation. The only Districts with significant increases in assessed valuation were Districts 13 and 14, however, the Districts receive no property tax allocation from them. (District 5 had a 1% increase in assessed valuation.) • User Fees The other part of the shortfall is due to recent actions taken by firms such as Ad Valorem and Revenue Enhancement who are reviewing charges on clients' property tax bills for a percent of the savings. These firms have filed over fifty claims in the past year-and-a-half, representing clients such as Fedoo and Price Club. Total refunds to date are approximately$1.1 million. The companies they represent are generally companies with large square footage and low water usage. Efforts to replace the current user fee schedule with one based on categories of land use should result in more accurate billings and fewer claims filed. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Y Page 3 November 13, 1996 Judy Wilson also advised, with the passage of Proposition 218 in the November election, General Counsel has been asked to take a careful look at the initiative. It appears that we will need to do the required notice, even if we are merely extending the current user fee schedule. The effective date of the initiative is July 1997. The Districts should adopt a new fee schedule in the spring to avoid the notification expense. General Counsel will have a report for the December FAHR meeting. REPORT OF ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER -OPERATIONS The Assistant General Manager of Operations had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Mr. Streed advised that two handouts were placed before the Committee. One of the handouts was from Ruthann Moomey of Callan Associates. Ms. Moomey will give a presentation regarding the Quarterly Investment Portfolio Report and, specifically, will review the new policy duration of the long-term portfolio. The other handout was prepared by Gary Streed which addresses a recent article in the Orange County Register. The handout which Mr. Streed prepared contains correct figures and information which was not accurately stated in the newspaper article which depicted Special Districts as being "flushed with cash." Mr. Streed advised that the Committee's January 1997 meeting is currently scheduled for January 8, 1997. Since the New Year holiday falls on the first Wednesday of the month, the OMTS meeting is being moved to January 8. In order to avoid a conflict, Mr. Streed requested the Committee's permission to move the FAHR meeting to January 15. The Committee had no objection to moving the meeting date. Gary Streed reported that the Districts' daily COP rates were included in the agenda package mailed to the Committee. Since the mailing, as usually happens, the rates have decreased and are now down to 3.40 and 3.50 percents. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES The Director of Human Resources had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION The Director of General Services had no report. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS The Director of Communications reported that the second Planning Advisory Committee will be held November 14, at the Districts from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Recent articles which appeared in the Times and Register regarding our workplace investigation were published on different dates. Calls were made to the newspapers, but only one reporter from the Times returned a call. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 4 November 13, 1996 On November 6, 1996, the City Managers Association met at the Districts. There were 37 guests. Dave Ludwin, Ed Hodges and Linda Eisman participated. The next meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan is scheduled for Thursday, December 5, at 5:00 p.m. The next meeting of the Rate Advisory Committee is scheduled for Thursday, December 12, at 9:00 a.m. REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Nos. 1-9) 1. FAHR96-64 RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORTS FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1995 (All Districts) MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file the Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1996, and forward to the Joint Boards. 2. FAHR96-65: RECEIVE AND FILE QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (All Districts) COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Steve Kozak and Ruthann Moomey gave the presentation. During discussion, 8 was agreed to allow Mr. Kozak to develop program alternatives for the possible extension of maturities and duration benchmarks for the Districts' Long-Term Investment Portfolio. The Committee further requested that Tom Woodruff supplement the staff report with copies of the sections of the Government Code which relate to the types of investments that the Committee has responsibility for. The Committee requested that this item be brought before them in January. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this information-only report. 3. FAHR96-66: RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PURCHASING SYSTEM AND POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES, SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 86-81 (All Districts): The Contracts/Purchasing Manager and General Counsel recommend the adoption of a new purchasing resolution to streamline processes, reduce expenditures and provide increased staff efficiency. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend the Joint Boards adopt a new Purchasing Resolution repealing Purchasing Resolution No. 86-81. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee v Page 5 November 13, 1996 4. FAHR96-67: EMPLOYMENT STATUS REPORT(AII Districts): Total head count for October 1996 at the Districts. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Mike Peterman advised that total head count was 597.25 at the time this report was prepared. The numbers have changed in the last couple of weeks. There have been ten resignations. Don McIntyre interjected that the actual figure is now 588 and will be going down to 562. The early retirement figures are not included in this count, since those are expected to take place in January, February and March 1997. Judy Wilson advised that 8 people are expected to retire. The Committee requested staff to generate a report which shows changes in the budget due to accelerated retirement and how these changes affect the work plan with a compressed staff. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file the Employment Status Report. 5. FAHR96-68: SELECTION OF DISTRICTS' COMMERCIAL BANK(All Districts). MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend that the Joint Boards approve the selection of Union Bank of California to serve as the Districts'commercial bank for a three (3) year period commencing on January 1, 1997, with the Districts' option to renew for an additional two (2) years thereafter. 6. FAHR96-69: RECEIVE, APPROVE AND FILE THE DISTRICTS' COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 THAT WAS PREPARED BY STAFF AND AUDITED BY MORELAND&ASSOCIATES, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTS; ANNUAL MANAGEMENT LETTER; AUDITOR'S REPORT TO FAHR COMMITTEE; AND THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT REPORT; AND FORWARD THE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT TO THE JOINT BOARDS (All Districts): COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Mike Moreland addressed the Committee's questions and advised that the areas that the audit found the Districts not to be in compliance with are due to new requirements of the California Government Code which went into effect on January 1. These areas have to do with rendering reports within 30 days. He stated that this is not unusual because even smaller entities cannot get the information in time. It is important to recognize these are new legislations and staff is trying to follow them. Staff initially had problems with the new requirements and efforts have been made to ensure these violations do not happen in the future. Staff advised that the Investment Policy has been adopted annually and will also come into compliance by being reviewed on time. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive, approve and file: 1.) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1996; 2.) the annual Management Letter and the Auditor's Report to the Finance, Administrative and Human Resources Committee; 3.) and the Appropriations Limit Report; and 4.) forward the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to the Joint Boards. Minutes of Finance, Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 6 U November 13, 1996 7. FAHR96-70: REVIEW, APPROVE AND FORWARD THE 1995-96 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 TO THE JOINT BOARDS (All Districts). COMMITTEE DISCUSSION: Mike White and Greg Mathews reported on the District's financial and operational status. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve and forward the 1996-97 Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter Ended September 30, 1996 to the Joint Boards. 8. FAHR96-71: PROGRESS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (FIS) (All Districts). MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file this information-only report. 9. FAHR96-72: RECEIVE AND FILE STAFF SUMMARY REPORT ON TRAINING FOR FIRST QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 (All Districts). MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to receive and file the staff summary report on training for first quarter fiscal year 1996-97. CLOSED SESSION The Chair reported to the Committee the need for a closed session, as authorized by Government Code Sections 54957.6, to discuss and consider the item that is specified as Items (8)(b)(1) on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in Closed Session at 7:30 p.m. Confidential Minutes of the closed session held by the Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re Agenda Items listed under Closed Session as items(a)(1) and (a)(2). At 8:42 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. Minutes of Finance. Admin. and Human Resources Committee Page 7 November 13, 1996 MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, December 11, 1996. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Submitted' by: e pra Crane Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Secretary HIWPDTATINMIOZRANETPC.MTGWAHR.Ml996_MINWFAHRN% v AGENDA V ❑ ecea.wro ITEM- a ❑ 'Ac ITEM ° rt-eas.goNSEN;I TRANSMITTAL ❑ eli'lIOS.DLSCU5510N �.:.. . 'vjNONCONSLTIT} ' ❑w�HENUFA+ -A ! e0.4 IPceTA1GDATE 3 S "eDS.AOENQA.riEM}TQ :. Ilu- '"Na I + MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION _(Initials of Origirtator) OMTS: =-� PDC:FAHR:11-13-95 ALL 2210,Gary G. Streed, Ext.2500 EXEC: 5TF0: f STEER: Division No.,Name,aM Extension JT.BDS:11-20-96 ' AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS): Agenda Wording. RECEIVE AND FILE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1996 (All Districts) Recommended Action(s): 1. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of October 1996. CECA REVIEW: Project le Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of ExamPlion Roal Negative Decleretion Approved on Final EIR Appmvad on_ml Nonce of Deterrminegon find on September 25, 1996 BUDGET INFORMATION WA CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR. YEAR-TO ATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED Ali BUDGET AMOUNT TOaATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDRURES 60 1awes pm.m,we,q ScheduwWre Item: N/A N/A N/A N/A AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/U.Item: AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AR WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POUCYACTION? NO If YES,slatenunme.. _Peimmnt LimadTeem If YES,eoplaln In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) To Committee: g nature pay ion Me 9 er esigner� 1 y6 natureDay To JL Bills.:partment Head(Or Designee) S ure Day Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Background andfer summery) The Districts have used Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO),as our professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust as our third-party custodian since September 1995. The Districts' Investment Policy adopted by the Joint Boards includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the"Liquid Operating Monies'and for the 'Long-Term Operating Monies.' All of the Investment Policy requirements are being complied with. Historical cost and the current market 'mark-to-market'values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The slight differences are caused by differing assumptions regarding marketability at the estimate date. The Districts' investments are in compliance with the Districts' adopted Investment Policy, and the California Government Code. In addition, sufficient funds are available for the Districts to meet its operating expenditure requirements for the next six months. Attached are schedules showing the detail for both the short-term and long-term portfolio investments. Balances Estimated CSDOC Sept 30,1996 Yield(%) State of Calif. LNF $9,939,191 5.6 Bank of America 447,200 3.6 Overnight Repurchase Agreement 1,485,000 3.8 PIMCO-Short-term Portfolio 14,077,025 5.3 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 289.565,378 6.5 District 11 GO Bond Fund 10,080 5.4 Debt Service Reserves @ Trustees 33,514,981 6.0 County Commingled 8,042 5A Petry Cash 3,900 — Deferred Compensation 9.602.516 $358 107 2B3 GGS:Ic c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager H:\WP.DTAIFIM2210\CRANETPC.MTGTAHR.95WOV.AITIFAHR96.64A Page 2 of 2 Revision: 8128196 OCSG000100 MELLON TRUST CSDOC-CONSOLIDATED FIXED INCOME CHARACTERISTICS SUMMARY BASE: USD 31-OCT-1996 XB650S 4 OF MARKET COST TERM OUR. YIELD BASE SECTOR COUPON TOTAL PRICE PRICE IYRS) (YRS) 4 MARKET VALUE BASE COST --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. GOVERNMENTS 6.930 34.40 102.6094 103.1934 3.07 2.01 5.93 90,790,345 91,326,197 U.S. AGENCIES 6.467 50.67 99.7557 99.9395 3.92 3.49 6.52 134,256,974 134,510,625 BANKING 6 FINANCE 7.036 10.46 101.6496 101.7023 1.92 1.94 6.14 27,598,990 27,627,437 INDUSTRIAL 9.400 4.27 107.3034 109.5914 2.94 2.50 6.44 11,264,175 11,507,100 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: 6.811 100.00 101.2576 101.6162 3.37 3.05 6.27 263,910,484 264,979,358 Page 1 OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-OCT-1996 HB1100 % OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALUE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD ______________________________ __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.40 0.40 0.00t 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 6,711,653.19 6,711,653.19 47.194 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LE 495,BB5.56 495,885.56 3.494 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THN 1YR 4,240,215.50 4,240,215.50 29.814 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THN 1YR 784,432.19 794,432.19 5.51i 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LES 1,684,725.49 1,694,725.49 11.84% 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 160,113.00 160,113.00 1.13% 0.00 6,004.24 3.75 __________________ __________________ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- TOTAL CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,077,025.33 14,077,025.33 98.977 0.00 6,004.24 0.04 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 147,069.49 147,069.49 1.03i 0.00 0.00 0.00 __________________ __ _____ ________ _________________ ________________ ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 147,069.49 147,069.49 1.036 0.00 0.00 0.00 ............... a----------------- ---=---- ----------------- veve»`--------- --- NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 14,224,094.82 14,224,094.82 100.00% 0.00 6,004.24 0.04 Page 1 OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPBR-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE USD 31-OCT-1996 HB1100 MARKET 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CORR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICR MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0 CASH 1.000 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL CASH 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 700,000 AMERICAN TEL 6 TL DISC 98.893 692,184.42 4.87 692,184.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/12/1996 200.000 BELL SOUTH TELCOM DISC 98.803 197,606.00 1.39 197,606.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/19/1996 1,500,000 CRISES D-AMORT DISC 98.215 1,473,228.75 10.36 1,473,228.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/13/1996 1,800,000 CANADIAN WHEAT BD DISC 98.609 1,774,967.50 12.48 1,774,967.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/12/1996 000,000 ELECTRIC PRANCE DISC 99.379 795,034.44 5.59 795,034.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/04/1996 300,000 KFW INTL FIN INC DISC 99.563 298,690.00 2.10 298,690.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/22/1996 1,500,000 WESTERN RUST TREY DISC 98.663 1,479,942.08 10.40 1,479,942.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/20/1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 6,711,653.19 47.19 6,711,653.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL BOMB LOAN MORTGAGE -LESS THAN 1 YR 500,000 FED HOME LN MTG CORP DISC HIS 99.177 495,885.56 3.49 495,885.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 11/13/1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 495,885.56 3.49 495,895.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS TEN IYR 1,600,000 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC NT 98.666 2,578,656.00 11.10 1,579,656.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 11/14/1996 2,700,000 FEDERAL NAIL MTG ASSN DISC HIS 98.576 2,661,559.50 18.71 2,661,559.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 11/21/1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FNMA ISSUES - LESS TEN IYR 4,240,215.50 29.81 4,240,215.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 FED RM LOAN SEE - LESS TEN IYR Page 1 OCSF075111 MELLON TRUST LIQUID OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-OCT-1996 HB1100 MARKET t OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CORE SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SOO,00O FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 97.662 488,311.11 3.43 488,311.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 MATURES 11/12/1996 300,000 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 98.707 296,121.08 2.08 296,121.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 11/13/96 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS TEN 784,432.19 5.51 784,432.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - LESS THAN 1 YEAR 600,000 FED FARM CR BK CONS DISC NTS 99.283 595,696.16 4.19 595,696.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 11/06/1996 1,100,000 FED FARM CR SK CONS DISC NTS 99.003 1,099,029.33 7.66 1,089,029.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAT 11/26/1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK - 1,684,725.49 11.84 1,684,725.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 160,113 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 100.000 160,113.00 1.13 160,113.00 0.00 6,004.24 3.75 PUBLIC II ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUN 160,113.00 1.13 160,113.00 0.00 6,004.24 3.75 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 14,077,025.33 98.97 14,077,025.33 0.00 6,DO4.24 0.04 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 0 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 1.000 147,069.49 1.03 147,069.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 147,069.49 1.03 247,069.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 147,069.49 1.03 147,069.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 ........................... ...--- ................-......:._........._____-- NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 19,224,099.52 100.00 14,224,094.82 0.00 6,004.24 0.04 Page 2 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-OCT-1996 HB1100 E OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CORE PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION COST MARKET VALVE TOTAL GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YIELD CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0.37 0.37 0.00E 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 19,320,978.00 19,328,978.00 6.64E 0.00 0.00 0.00 TREASURY BILLS - LESS TEN 1YR 4,719,669.45 4,719,669.45 1.62E 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 537,372.00 537,372.00 0.18E 0.00 20,L51.45 3.75 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 24,586,019.82 24,586,019.82 8.44E 0.00 20,151.45 0.06 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES V.S. GOVERNMENTS 91,326,196.95 90,790,345.00 31.18E -535,851.85 6,126,075.00 6.75 U.S. AGENCIES 134,518,625.00 134,256,974.00 46.11E -261,651.00 8,700,040.00 9.48 BANKING 6 FINANCE 27,627,436.61 27,598,990.45 9.48E -28,446.16 1,905,397,00 9.90 INDUSTRIAL 11,507,100.00 11,264,175.00 3.87E -242,925.00 988,500.00 8.79 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 264,979,358.46 263,910,484.45 90.64E -1,068,B74.01 17,720,812.00 6.71 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 2,656,930.23 2,656,930.23 0.91E 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------ ------------------ -------- ----------------- ---------------- ------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 2,656,930.23 2,656,930.23 0.91E 0.00 0.00 0.00 .................. .................. ........ ................. ................ ....... NET PORTFOLIO ASSETS 292,222,308.51 291,153,434.50 100.00E -1,068,874.01 17,740,963.45 6.09 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-OCT-1996 H11I100 MARKET k OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CURR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD _______________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH 0 CASH 1.000 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 ______________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL CASH 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 2,700,000 CAISSB D'AMORT DISC 99.190 2,678,137.50 0.92 2,678,137.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/25/1996 6,000,000 CAISSE D'AMORT DISC 99.123 5,947,301.94 2.04 5,947,381.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/04/1996 4,700,000 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 98.002 4,643,688.70 1.59 4,643,688.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 11/12/1996 2,200,000 KELL000 CO DISC 99.186 2,182,101.78 0.75 2,202,201.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/16/1996 900,000 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 99.330 993,974.00 0.31 993,974.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/13/1996 900,000 NATIONAL RURAL DISC 99.416 894,740.00 0.31 894,740.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/02/1996 2,100,000 NATIONAL RURUAL DISC 99.474 2,088,954.00 0.72 2,088,954.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12/22/1996 _____________________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 19,328,978.00 6.64 19,328,970.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TREASURY BILLS - LESS THN 1YR 5,000,000 U S TREASURY BILLS 94 .393 4,719,669.45 1.62 4,719,669.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 06/26/1997 DO 06/27/96 _____________________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL TREASURY BILLS - LESS THN 1 4,719,669.45 1.62 4,719,669.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS 537,372 BSDT RESERVE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT- 100.000 537,372.00 0.18 537,372.00 0.00 20,151.45 3.75 PUBLIC II _____________________________________________________________________________ SUBTOTAL BSDT REBER" DEPOSIT ACCOUN 537,372.00 0.10 537,372.00 0.00 20,151.45 3.75 _____________________________________________________________________________ TOTAL CASH a CASH EQUIVALENTS 24,586,019.82 8.44 24,586,019.92 0.00 20,151.45 0.08 Page 1 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD ' 31-OCT-1996 HB1100 MARKET 4 OF UNREALIZED ESTIMATED CORE SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. GOVERNMENTS 75,500,000 U S TREASURY NOTES 103.203 77,918,265.00 26.76 78,223,618.72 -305,353.72 5,379,375.00 6.90 07.1254 09/30/1999 DO 09/30/94 13,000,000 U S TREASURY NOTES 99.016 12,872,080.00 4.42 13,102,578.13 -230,498.23 747,500.00 5.81 05.750% 20/31/2000 DD 10/31/95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENTS 90,790,345.00 31.19 91,326,196.85 -535,851.85 6,126,875.00 6.75 U.S. AGENCIES 39,600,000 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BUS 99.844 39,538,224.00 13.58 39,890,500.00 -352,276.00 2,570,040.00 6.50 6.4904 09/13/2000 DO 09/13/95 15,000,000 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG CORP DEBS 98.266 14,739,900.00 5.06 14,554,687.50 185,212.50 898,500.00 6.10 5.990E 03/06/2001 DD 03/06/96 25,000,000 FEDERAL HOME IN MTG DEB 100.425 25,106,250.00 8.62 25,000,000.00 206,250.00 11680,000.00 6.69 6.720% 10/02/2000 DD 10/02/95 25,000,000 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEB 100.826 25,207,000.00 8.66 25,351,562.50 -144,562.50 1,712,500.00 6.79 6.050% 05/26/2000 DD 05/26/95 30,000,000 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN MTN 97.I56 9,715,600.00 3.34 9,593,750.00 121,850.00 564,000.00 5.81 5.640% 02/20/2001 DO 02/20/96 20,000,000 FEDERAL NTAL MTG ASSN 99.750 19,950,000.00 6.85 20,128,125.00 -178,125.00 1,275,000.00 6.39 6.3754 10/13/2000 DD 10/10/95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL U.S. AGENCIES 134,256,974.00 46.11 134,518,625.00 -261,651.00 8,700,040.00 6.48 BANKING 6 FINANCE 1,500,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR # 00201 100.450 1,506,750.00 0.52 1,534,950.00 -28,200.00 122,400.00 8.12 8.160% 01/31/1997 DO O1/11/95 465,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR # 00224 100.553 467,571.45 0.16 475,972.61 -8,401.16 37,572.00 8.04 8.0804 01/31/1997 DO O1/31/95 1,500,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR # 00258 100.620 1,509,300.00 0.52 1,522,140.00 -12,040.00 110,700.00 7.33 7.3804 03/17/1997 DO 03/03/95 2,900,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR # 00306 101.827 2,952,983.00 1.01 2,952,896.00 87.00 210,830.00 7.14 7.270E 04/13/1998 DO 04/13/95 1,000,000 CHRYSLER FINL MTN TR # 00335 100.351 1,003,510.00 0.34 993,160.00 10,350.00 62,600.00 6,24 6.260% 07/20/1998 DO 07/18/95 7,100,000 FORD MOTOR CR MTN TR # 00177 99.906 7,093,326.00 2.44 6,999,748.00 93,578.00 402,570.00 5.68 VAR/RT 03/30/1999 DO 03/30/94 4,000,000 FORD MTR CR MTN TRANCHE #TR 96 99.517 3,980,680.00 1.37 3,970,480.00 10,200.00 243,200.00 6.11 Page 2 OCSF075222 MELLON TRUST LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PORTFOLIO DETAIL BY SECTOR BASE: USD 31-OCT-1996 HB1100 MARKET t OF UNREALISED ESTIMATED CURR SHARES/PAR SECURITY DESCRIPTION PRICE MARKET VALUE TOTAL COST GAIN/LOSS ANNUAL INCOME YLD --------------- ------------------'------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLTG/RT 11/09/1998 DD 11/08/93 3,000,000 G M A C MED TERM NTS 106.362 3,190,860.00 1.20 3,227,070.00 -36,210.00 258,750.00 8.11 8.625% 1/10/2000 DO 1/10/95 3,700,000 GENERAL HIRE ACCEP MTN TR00324 104.470 3,865,390.00 1.33 3,911,640.00 -46,250.00 309,875.00 8.02 8.375% 02/03/2999 DO 0/03/95 1,000,000 LEHMAN BROS INC SR SUB NIS 100.551 11005,510.00 0.35 1,007,520.00 -2,010.00 70,000.00 6.96 7.000% 5/15/1997 DO 5/27/94 1,000,000 SEARS ROEBUCK MTN E TR 00491 102.311 1,023,110.00 0.35 1,031,960.00 -8,750.00 76,900.00 7.52 7.690% 02/27/1990 DO 02/28/95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL BANKING 6 PINANCE 27,590,990.45 9.48 27,627,436.61 -28,446.16 1,905,397.00 6.90 INDUSTRIAL 1,500,000 CHRYSLER CORP DEB 103 .221 1,548,315.00 0.53 1,603,320.00 -55,005.00 156,000.00 10.08 10.400% 08/01/1999 9,000,000 PHILIP MORRIS COS NT 107.954 9,715,860.00 3.34 9,903,780.00 -187,920.00 932,500.00 8.57 9.250% 02/15/2000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL INDUSTRIAL 11,264,175.00 3.07 11,507,100.00 -242,925.00 988,500.00 8.78 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------'- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 263,910,484.45 90.64 264,979,358.46 -1,068,874.01 17,720,012.00 6.71 OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 0 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 1.000 2,656,930.23 0.91 2,656,930.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- SUBTOTAL PAYABLES/RECEIVABLES 2,656,930.23 0.91 2,656,930.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL OTHER PORTFOLIO ASSETS 2,656,930.23 0.91 2,656,930.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 ............................................................................. NET PORTPOLIO ASSETS Z91,153,434.50 100.00 Z9Z,2Z2,308.51 -1,068,879.01 17,790,963.45 6.09 Page 3 MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ending 31 October 1996) Liquid Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $14,223,704 • Mellon $14,224,095 Historical Cost: $14,223,704 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.04 Of Index: 0.25 15.1.3 1% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact (gain/loss)of 1% Change: $5,689 0.04% 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: (see attached schedule) 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 100% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below "A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: 0.46 3 Months: 1.32 12 Months: 5.57 Year-to-Date: 4.54 Index Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: 0.44 N' _V'INAN('!`11/ONULI.CIKI/�PPI MONTHLY REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ending 31 October 1996) Long Term Operating Monies 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: PIMCO 291,058,257 • Mellon 1291,153,434 Historical Cost: $292,128,857 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 2.4 Of Index: 2.3 15.1.3 I% INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact aintloss of 1% Change: $6,985,398 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule % 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY % of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: NA 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW "A" RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Portfolio Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: 1.39 3 Months: 2.92 12 Months: 5.94 Year-to-Date: 3.68 Index Total Rate of Return: 1 Month: 1.38 v AGENDA y D ITEM ' TRANSMITTAL HRS h>Q2S�G DiTEL"�. � ✓�� SY _ft { r MEETING DATE COMM:ID NL). DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION It-q.. (Initials of Ongiretep POD: FAHR: 11/13/96 i'f .�,^:yj 7230,Marc Dubois, Ext. 2650 EXEC: P ti'?m&- ALL STEER: s STEER°'-' ""' '� `',?' Division No.,Name,and Ebension AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wording: RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PURCHASING SYSTEM AND POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES, SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 86-81 (All Districts): The Contracts/Purchasing Manager and General Counsel recommend the adoption of a new purchasing resolution to streamline processes, reduce expenditures and provide increased staff efficiency. Recommended Action(s): Adopt new Purchasing Resolution repealing Purchasing Resolution No. 86-81. CEQA REVIEW: Projec Is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Daciantion Approved on NOT APPLICABLE Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Deteminxtion filed on BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.:N/A BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES penal e.ape pe m^x.,.I Sclxadule/tJne Hem: AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: WA WA N/A N/A SchedulaiLm Hem: AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,M. CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT WA WA WA WA WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO If YES,stxtenumher Permanent Umhed Term I If YES,explain In ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONC CES� Il ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) lD�yr/5b To Committee: 1. Proposed Resolution Sign'alure D to D on Mana (O Designee) ro 1B yin ena ure Date To Jt. Bds.: 1. Proposed Resolution epartment Ld (Or Designee) /��,' ct L a, /O�z9/9L Sign a Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) ti ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Baoltg.nd and/or Summery) After a thorough evaluation of the current Purchasing Resolution, the Districts' Contracts/Purchasing Manager and General Counsel recommend the adoption of a new purchasing resolution which dramatically streamlines processes, reduces expenditures and provides for increased staff efficiency well beyond current levels. The proposed Purchasing Resolution's emphasis is directed toward review and approval processes, Flexibility in standard purchase awards and to accommodate Purchasing's strategy to incorporate "Best Practices"in daily procurement and contract activity District-wide. Enclosed is a "red-line"version of the proposed Purchasing Resolution with highlighted additions and line-through deletions for the Committee's review. The significant changes can be summarized as follows: 1. Recognizes position titled "Contracts Administrator/Purchasing Manager." 2. Includes disposition of surplus and by-products by methods other than "sale.' 3. Adds review, approve and maintain active insurance documents for all suppliers on site to duties. 4. Includes recent Board-approved language regarding change in company name without further Board action. 5. Allows Contracts Administrator/Purchasing Manager, rather than Director of Finance, to sign PO's reguiring Board approval. S. Allows staff to order supplies, equipment and services that are included within the adopted budget without Board approval. 7. Retains that all public works contracts would continue to be approved by the Board. 8. Allows renewal agreements, if included in original Board action, to be executed without annual Board action. 9. Allows informal bids to be obtained by fax as well as traditional methods. 10. Allows blanket orders for inventory stock items. MDD:Ih c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager HAWP.DTAT1N=10tCRANEtFPC.MTGIFAHR.98WOV.AITIFAHR96.6e Page 2 of 2 Rwslon: 828M y RESOLUTION NO. PURCHASING AND CONTRACTS AWARD RESOLUTION A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PURCHASING SYSTEM AND POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES, SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 86-81 WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 54202 requires that every local agency shall adopt policies and procedures, including bidding regulations, governing purchases of supplies, services and equipment and that purchases of supplies, services and equipment by the local agency shall be in accordance with said duly adopted policies; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 54204 requires that if the local agency is other than a city, county or city and county, policies provided for in Section 54202 of said Code shall be adopted by means of a written rule or regulation, copies of which shall be available for public distribution; and WHEREAS, in order to establish efficient procedures for the purchase of supplies, services and equipment and the letting of public works contracts at the best possible cost commensurate with quality and delivery needs, together with other relevant factors, to exercise positive financial control over purchases, to clearly define authority for the purchasing function and to establish bidding procedures, a purchasing system for the Districts and the Joint Administrative Organization, hereinafter referred TLW:Pj9 2SO:DrzR No.5:10/17M t 9 to as "Districts", beyond what is required by said Sections of the Government Code, is desirable and in the best public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE: ARTICLE I GENERAL 115DEX M y" secttortl e°�o+iu ftra °9sY IIx 4s� eff4r ijiacaAu +a MO PROUMN S;Bc�at%�' �ooP4fdt[v, ��gJ Section : System Adoption. In order to establish efficient procedures for the purchase of supplies, services and equipment, and the letting of public works contracts at the best possible cost commensurate with quality and delivery needs and other relevant factors, to exercise positive financial control over purchases, to clearly define authority for the purchasing function, to establish bidding procedures and in pursuance of Section 54202 of the Government Code of the State of California, a purchasing system is hereby adopted. Section : Purchasino Division Director of Finance Authority. There is hereby vested in the Purchasing Division (hereinafter referred to as "Purchasing"), under the T W:PJ> 250DMR No.SIM 7M 2 _Y general supervision and direction of the Director of Finance, the authority for the purchase of supplies, services and equipment, letting of public works contracts and establishment of rules, procedures and administrative policies relative thereto. The Director of Finance may delegate or assign any or all of the following duties to the ti Contracts Administrator/Purchasing Manager: (a) TG purchase or contract for supplies, services and equipment required by any Department or Division, in accordance with purchasing procedures prescribed by this Resolution; such administrative regulations as Purchasing shall adopt for the internal management and operation of Purchasing, and such other rules and regulations as shall be adopted by the Boards of Directors. (b) To negotiate and recommend execution of contracts for the purchase of supplies, services and equipment; for construction of public works projects; and for the saleanifflK of surplus property and by-products of the sewage treatment process. ti (c) o prepererev etw:app70 orsu m ;; o eirera%Counsal all contracts, purchase orders and other related documents, the original executed copies of which shall be delivered to the Board Secretary for custodianship. (d) Ret To prepare for the Districts, the needed sianda ar pecrflca`L'ons of quality in supplies, services, equipment and construction at the best cost and under the most favorable conditions, with due consideration to delivery and other relevant factors. (e) discourage uniform bidding and endeavor to obtain as full and open competition as possible on all purchases and sales. TLWy)f3C]503he11 No.5 1W7M 3 P (f) Ub prepare rules, regulations, procedures and administrative policies, and revisions thereto, governing the purchase of supplies, services and equipment;and for the letting of public works construction contracts ih accordance*Ift Tf te'pr y stori5sM Mate law; and seiesdisposlfign of surplus property and by-products. (g) T� prepare rules, regulations, procedures and administrative policies, and revisions thereto, governing the warehousing of inventories. (h) keep informed of current developments in the field of purchasing, ft tt;;,ftlg tl .. , rtedto prices, market conditions and new products. (i) r prescribe and maintain such forms as reasonably necessary to the eperetionimpli.,i tatlon of this Resolution and other rules and regulations,;gf Wstricts: Q) To develop specifications to establish minimum standards for all purchases. (k) Ta supervise the inspection of all supplies, services and equipment purchases to insure conformance with specifications. (1) To provide for transfer of surplus or unused supplies and equipment between Departments as needed. (m) rA have custodianship and control of all inventories and surplus property. (n) maintain a bidders' list, vendors' catalog file, and records needed for efficient operation of the Purchasing Division. fa) @v_qW approve akCii6k ttain active insurance documents fora!!' Districts'piocurements, TLW,J� Dmn No.5:1N17M 4 fefrpj such other and future duties as, in the Directofs discretion, are incidental and necessary to the conduct of the Division. e +s,�t�2f�sa(e��se"��a�ieo�gani�ilt. �",8u� ie b ts�Ta& f u1 LaZ S�9 t1 . si eF 9"MR5 W9IAe�M 54 a1 A 9; I 78ass` [9 iEra� as alJ Section 3: Requisitions. All employees of the Districts who need or require supplies, services endor equipment to carry out the defined duties of their positions, shall submit requisitions for purchases or warehouse requisitions to Purchasing on standard requisition forms and in accordance with the adopted rules, regulations, procedures and policies of the Purchasing Division. Section 4: Cooperative Procurement. (a) The Districts, through Purchasing, may participate in or sponsor, conduct and/or administer a Cooperative Procurement Agreement for the acquisition of procured items ervtces with any other public agency purchasing unit, in accordance with an agreement between the Districts and the other public agency. (b) The Districts, through Purchasing, may sell to, acquire from, or use any nwyl�zw:Dn NO.s:ianrse 5 property belonging to another public agency, including the cooperative use of supplies or services. ARTICLE II P R HA ES: SUPPLIES, SERVICESAND EQUIPMENT ffm OROo FWWSQ2MdM1 MSOMMQ. M x�aN�p�,al4' • , %5H iIie55 05VOL.Q g .StPtt Section 5. Purchases: Bidding Requirements. Except as hereinafter provided, purchasing of supplies, services or equipment shall be by bid procedures as set forth herein, when the purchase is estimated to have values greater than Twenty-Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars; end the commodities or services may be obtained from more than one vendor; are not standardized as to price; and no emergency exists. Section 6: Purchases: Emergency. Whenever an emergency arises which is, nwylsxxea:o No.5:10MM 6 Y or may be a threat to the continued required operations of the wastewater treatment plants and facilities owned by the Districts, or when purchases are immediately necessary for the preservation of life or property, or to avoid a threat to the public health or safety, the Division may purchase supplies, services or equipment required for immediate use, in an amount greater than Twenty-Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars without observing the procedures set forth in this Resolution. In such event, Purehasing #W,(W6re hi shall advise the District Chairman and/or Chairman Pro Tem, or the Joint Chairman and/or Vice Joint Chairman, as appropriate, of the action taken, and such action shall be ratified by the Boards of Directors at their next regular meeting. Section 7: Purchases: Standardized Prices and Specialized Services. In purchases of supplies, services or equipment in which the items to be purchased have a demonstrated uniformity in price, or it is determined that there is a sole source, or the provider of services is determined to be uniquely qualified to perform specialized services, Purchasing may make such purchases without observing the bidding procedures of Section 44_ below. a 8: Purchase Orders. Purchases of all supplies, services or equipment shall be made by purchase order and may also require a formal written contract, when determined necessary or appropriate by the Contracts Administrator/Purchasing Manager. To ensure that all policies and procedures governing purchase orders and contracts are followed, all contracts or purchase orders less then Fifty Thousand f%59;BB6-6B}Bof+ers will be executed by the Contracts Administrator/Purchasing TLW'pjlJ 25 ,Dml No 6:1011 7 F Manager. Purchasing and employees requisitioning supplies and equipment shall be responsible that orders and requisitions are in conformity with the spirit and intent of this Resolution and that no purchase has been broken into smaller units to evade any requirement of this Resolution. Purchasing shall retain, in its files, one copy of all purchase orders issued during two (2) years preceding, on which copy of the purchase order, there shall be a list of bidders and prices bid for the materials or equipment purchased, or if no bids or quotations were taken or received, a full statement as to the reason therefor. A record of all sales or surplus property and by-products shall also be maintained by Purchasing upon or in which is maintained the record of the bids received for the property or by-products sold, or if bids were not taken or received, a full explanation thereof. Such records shall be maintained for two (2) years after the sale. pf.e��. RW'OI��60DrzR No.6a Orzb96 g V Section 409: Purchases: Encumbrances of Funds. Except in cases of emergency, no purchase order shall be issued for any supplies, services or equipment, unless there exists an unencumbered appropriation balance in the fund against which said purchase is to be charged. Section+10: Bidding Procedure- Purchases end-Sates Greater Than $50.000.00. Except as otherwise provided bar$ dton,$ herein, purchases of supplies, equipment and services and the sale of personal pfepeFty of estimated value greater than Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars shall be by written contract or purchase order agreement with the lowest responsible bidder, pursuant to the procedures prescribed herein. }c 5 Mofsupl?�ia 4t�ln � o� �v@altP l 9eie - Vo_v8 . . _4.�....: ...Wa:u... l�c�t°'�"'OY 99T ecom b oia arr�caf7 nst IlPUNCOo'ffONOaets aF f&ecoa/zP> s�. r�orossuance or`a�'�l ....: .. ROMP s o zorf7 (a) Notice Inviting Bids. The notice inviting bids shall include a general description of the articles or services to be purchased or sold, shall state where bid forms and specifications may be secured, and the time and place for opening bids. (1) Published Notice. The notice inviting bids shall set a date for the opening of bids. The notice shall be published one (1) time at least ten (10) days nWyJ x250D� w.SAWI7I 9 8 before the date for the opening of the bids. Notice shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published within the Districtsllff L q. (2) Bidders List. Purchasing may also solicit sealed bids from all qualified, responsible prospective suppliers whose names are on the Bidders List maintained by the Districts, or who have requested their names to be added thereto- (3) Bulletin Boards. Purchasing shall also advertise pending purchases or sales by a notice posted on a public bulletin board in the Purchasing Division Office"MYWOR...:Li r1 1 oar s eemet/allplr h�a.:.. :.. (b) Bidder's Security. When deemed necessary by the Division, bidder's security may be prescribed in the contract specifications or in the public notice inviting bids. Bidders shall be entitled to the return of bid security upon the full execution of an awarded contract or issuance of a purchase order, by the successful bidder. A successful bidder shall forfeit his bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract within the prescribed time after the notice of award of contract has been matfedd on! f9< i.S , unless the Districts are responsible for they delay pee The Boards of Directors may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsive, responsible bidder. If the Boards of Directors award the contract to the next lowest bidder, an amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be forfeited te the Bistriets, and the surplus,if an�, shall be ,ettirmed to the lowest bidder to eeltial the diffefemee between the low bid and e ewefdeel bid. .6WAYWROldlee eri�e v4;d�h f `$ir1 ' TLMpJSUMO ft Na.5:1011755 10 awid€ Srsi�= �� et� Atleiist? s �0ftiesurplgs `-," , 41' �t��deG# (c) Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the Contracts Administrator and Secretary of the Boards of Directors, and shall be identified as bids on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public by the Contracts Administrator or his designated representative at the time and place stated in the public notices. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty (30) calendar days after the bid opening. (d) Rejection of Bids. In their discretion, the Boards of Directors may reject any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If all bids are rejected, the Boards of Directors, by majority vote, may declare that the materials or supplies may be acquired at a lower cost by negotiation in the open market and authorize the purchase in that manner. a"arded by the Beafds of BiFeCiOM to the lovgest responsible biddef, except as otherwise pFogided herein. (a) Tie Bids, If two or more bids received are for the same total amount or unit price, (with quality and service being equal), and if the public interest will not be best served by a delay of readvertising for bids, the Boards of Directors may accept the one they choose or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie bidders at the time of the award. n.WsJ� aft No.SAW17ea 11 (f) Performance Bonds. Purchasing shall have authority to require a faithful performance bond, a labor and materials bond and/or a warranty bond, before entering into a contract in an amount as it shall find reasonably necessary to protect the best interests of the Districts. If the Purchasing Division requires any of these bonds, the form and amount of the bond shall be described in the notice inviting bids and in the contract specifications. (g) Exception. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) through (f) above, the Purchasing Division may award a contract to purchase supplies, equipment or services in an amount greater than Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars without obtaining bids and following the procedures set forth above when the Z; .. .r ,X,W1j' urchasing N7aRa a Biaisiart determines that: (1) By purchasing immediately, it can avoid an imminent price increase or realize a substantial price discount that is available on a short term basis only; or (2) It can obtain equipment or supplies immediately that might not otherwise be available at such time as purchasing procedures could be completedr ,�i��n �. Q: .u.Rplle��e4ufltmen�.orpse�vice ?..a�B"'�cr�s VAN Yicecfbrs �"Y?ax°a1�1n�mtiC._.�E,.. Lim.��renewa7�'%.�.�Q �+ "cc c� N �(e auRS All such purchases shall be ratified by the Boards of Directors at their next TLWy1974250DnQ No.51 OM7/% 12 J regular meeting. Purchases of supplies, equipment and services, and the sale of emplus Bistfic personal property of an estimated value in the amount of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars or less on which bidding is not required by state law, may be made by the Purchasing Division in the open market without observing the procedures prescribed by Section 34 10 above. The procedures to be used for these purchases are as follows: (a) Minimum Number of Bids. Open market purchase shall, whenever possible, be based on at least three (3) bids and shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. (b) Solicitation of Bids. Bids shall be solicited by written requests to prospective vendors or purchasers and/or by telephone, facsimile'transrfrission and/or by public notice posted on a public bulletin board in the Purchasing Division Offices. (c) Receipt of Bids. Bids shall be submitted to the Purchasing Division, who shall keep a public record of all open market orders and bids for a period of two (2) years after the submission of bids or the placing of orders. (d) Purchases Less Than $1 ,000,00. The Purchasing Division may purchase supplies, equipment and services of a value in the amount of One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars or less per purchase order, without observing the procedures prescribed in this Section when, in its discretion, it is determined that observing such nw:clmasson ftu IW17M 13 H procedures would not result in a lower overall cost to the Districts. Section 4312: Blanket Purchase Orders. The Purchasing Division may issue annual blanket purchase orders for recurring purchases of miscellaneous supplies that: (d) Because of economic considerations are not carried in stock in the Districts' warehouse; (b_) Ytoillfrt§itjsafesgt»5les9{+1 WE has" li e e iaes a t "'w r jie best littefe $ } f is aeutvQr�� rgw. mn a. �;n_ r .i ve; o tera""�;�a"°� j��) �"w�il�scellaneaa�"� sices, amid fo viseellaneetts services, where such purchase of supplies and services in the aggregate will exceed an estimated value of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars from a single vendor during the budget year, without observing the procedures prescribed in Section ++TIO when, in its discretion, it is determined that such blanket purchase orders are at a cost favorable to the Districts and will result in more efficient procurement of such items. Blanket purchase orders shall be in conformity with the spirit and intent of this Resolution. The Purchasing Division shall, at the beginning of each budget year, file a list of such purchase orders and the estimated annual amount with the Director of Finance. Section +413: Inspection and Testing. The supplies and equipment delivered, and contractual services performed, shall be inspected to determine their conformance with the specifications set forth in the purchase order or contract. Purchasing shall have authority to request professional services, or to require chemical and physical 7LWyjt3025 DA N..5:1N17M 14 J tests of samples submitted with bids and samples of deliveries which are necessary to determine their quality and conformance with specifications. Section 45'f4: Purchases - Negotiated Contracts. Notwithstanding other provisions of this Resolution, the Boards of Directors may, when it appears in the best interests of the Districts, authorize the Staff to negotiate and award a contract for purchase of supplies, equipment or services without observing the procedures prescribed in Sections T and 13 covvef n J e<Sovia (a) When such authorization has been granted for purchase of supplies, equipment or services of an estimated value in the amount of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars or greater, the Staff shall obtain the concurrence of the District Chairman and/or Chairman Pro Tem, or the Joint Chairman and/or Vice Joint Chairman, as appropriate, prior to awarding such purchase. (b) Whenever any contract for supplies, equipment or services has been entered into between the Districts and a person or entity providing such supplies, equipment or services, and Purchasing determines that it is in the best interest of the Districts to continue said contract with such person or entity, Purchasing may, in its discretion, negotiate an extension of such contract without observing the procedures prescribed in Sections above, provided the amount of the extension does not exceed Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars. In the event the extension is in an amount greater than Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars, it shall be approved and awarded by the Boards of Directors. This Section shall not apply to the letting of public works construction contracts in excess of Twenty-Five Thousand nW�Jm 250M m o SAW17M 15 a ($25,000.00) Dollars. ARTICLE III fi6kEWIVIMAI, OF SURPLUS PROPERTY W—Ma Section 4615: Surplus Supplies and Equipment. All departments and/or divisions shall submit to Purchasing, at such times and in such farm as it shall prescribe, reports showing all supplies and/or equipment which are no longer used or which have become obsolete or worn out. Purchasing shall have authority, pursuant to the provisions of this Resolution, to sells or exchange for, or trade in on new supplies and equipment aYias (8e'ne ;opr% g all supplies and equipment which cannot be used by any other Department or Division, or which have become unsuitable for Districts' use. Section 471fi: Sale of Real Property. No real property of the Districts may be sold, or any negotiations leading to such sale may be made, without prior approval of the Boards of Directors. ARTICLE IV PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ISOMM R�gsswY1�S� `�:t�lraemer�C TLW#IM250Dr W5:1N1➢% 16 0 Section V,: Professional Services Agreement. All contracts for the retention of architectural, engineering and similar, related professional services shall be governed by the Policy of the Boards of Directors Establishing Procedures for the Selection of Professional, Engineering and Architectural Services, Resolution No. 90-43, dated May 9, 1990. WTAW 'ttie�� WgfrC_ 4�n1 � :, nea ! onstn I� e ift tl Section 2O% Public Works Contract Defined. Public works contracts are herein defined as contracts with duly licensed contractors in the State of California for the furnishing of labor, and materials and equipment and permits, 40404 rC for the erection, construction, alteration, repair, improvement of wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities, and any other public building, structure or improvement necessary to the operation of the Districts, in an amount greater than Twenty-Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars, as per Public Contract Code Sections 20783 at seq. E t iiet. EMMO in . edukiddi (terr ems);- J-h TLw,JZ34ZWD1 M.5:10117MS 17 a Section 21-20: Siddina Procedure - Public Works Construction Greater Than $25,000,00. Procedures for soliciting bids and awarding contracts for public works projects for more than Twenty-Five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars, shall be by written contract with the lowest responsible bidder, pursuant to the procedures prescribed herein and in accordance with applicable provisions of the Public Contracts Code 6cmn�U78"3 of the State of California. (a) Notice Inviting Bids. Notice inviting bids shall distinctly describe the work to be performed, shall state where bid forms and specifications may be secured, and the time and place for receiving and opening sealed bids. (1) Published Notice. Notice inviting bids shall set a date for the opening of bids. The first publication or posting of the notice shall be at least ten (10) calendar days before the date for the opening of the bids. Notice shall be published at least two (2) times, not less than five (5) days apart, in a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published within the Districts. (2) Mailed Notice. Unless the work to be done is proprietary, notice inviting bids shall be mailed to all contractors on the Districts' list of bidders for the category of work being bid and all trade journals(f1QW611iih notices specified for Orange County N�1f;J ?,95(7b�[ GS ti4t less than thirty (30) calendar days before the date of opening of bids. (3) Bidders List. Purchasing may also solicit sealed bids from all TLWy11742MM=ft No.SAW11% 18 j qualified, responsible, prospective suppliers whose names are on a Bidders List that may be maintained by Districts. (b) Bidders Security. When deemed necessary by the Purchasing Division, bidder's security may be prescribed in the contract specifications and in the public notice inviting bids. Bidders shall be entitled to return of bid security, upon full execution by the successful bidder of an awarded contract by the Districts. A successful bidder shall forfeit its bid security upon refusal or failure to execute the contract within the prescribed time after the notice of award of contract has been maifedF3F3 vp # h t dr�et, unless the Districts are responsible for the delay tji"" Ja S ,M ,¢,. The Boards of Directors may, on refusal or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the next lowest responsive, responsible bidder. If the Boards of Directors award the contract to the next lowest bidder, an amount of the lowest bidder's security e_p „e� ncert between the low bid and the awarded bid, shall be forfeited to the Districts, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder to-equal-the-diffefenee. (c) Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submitted to the Contracts Administrator and Secretary of the Boards of Directors and shall be identified as a bid, on the envelope. Bids shall be opened in public by the Contracts Administrator or his designee at the time and place stated in the public notice. A tabulation of all bids received shall be open for public inspection during regular business hours for a period of not less than thirty (30) calendar days after the bid opening. (d) ReLection of Bids. In their discretion, the Boards of Directors may reject nw*t1342om.nw.5:1W17M 19 1 any and all bids presented and readvertise for bids. If, after the opening of bids, all bids are rejected, the Boards of Directors, on a Resolution adopted by a four-fifths (4/5) vote, may declare that the work can be performed more economically by day labor, or the materials or supplies furnished at a lower price in the open market and may have the work done in a manner stated in the Resolution in order to take advantage of this lower cost. (e) ids. If two or more bids received are for the same total amount or unit price (with quality and service being equal) and if the public interest will not be best served by a delay or readvertising for bids, the Boards of Directors may accept the one itrq'g chooses, or accept the lowest bid made by negotiation with the tie bidders at the time of the award. (f) No Bids. If no bids are received, the Districts may have the work done by force account; may readvertise for bids pursuant to the procedures herein; or may select a contractor by negotiation. (g) Emergencies. Whenever an emergency arises which is, or may be, a threat to the continued operation of the wastewater facilities, support facilities and/or administrative facilities operated by the Districts, a contract for the repair or replacement of the public facility may be ordered by the General Manager without complying with the provisions of this Resolution or the Public Contracts Code. This authority is hereby delegated to the General Manager, or his designee, by the Boards of Directors pursuant to the authority of Public Contract Code Section 22050. In such event, the General Manager shall advise the District Chairman and/or Chairman Pro mwprxsan .SAW7 a 20 Tem, or the Joint Chairman and/or Vice Joint Chairman, as appropriate, of the action taken, and such action shall be confirmed by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the Boards of Directors at their next regular meeting. (h) Performance Bonds. The Purchasing Division shall require a faithful performance bond and a labor and materials bond. A warranty bond may be required before entering into a contract in an amount up to one hundred (100%) percent of the amount of the contract, as it shall find reasonably necessary to protect the best interests of the Districts. The form and amount of the bond shall be described in the notice inviting bids, or in the contract specifications. (i) Cost Records. Cost records shall be kept in the manner provided in Sections 4000 to 4007, inclusive, of the California Government Code. ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS 1N6�X reftftft Section 21i"<;: Noncompliance. Any transaction failing to comply with this Resolution in any respect is voidable in the discretion of the Boards of Directors, and any employee willfully and knowingly violating any provision of this Resolution may be TLW,] 9C]SOl1io .5=17M 21 subject to disciplinary action. Section 2a& Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the entire Resolution or any of the remaining portions thereof. The Boards of Directors hereby declare that they would have passed this Resolution, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 244A Repeal of Conflicting Rules. Resolution No. 86-81 and all Resolutions or motions, or portions thereof in conflict herewith, are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. Section Z59: Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption by the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held nwal2342500 eNo.s:rarriae 22 FeBdYBe�Nnh AGENDA O .,CDhMsWEOREM' x : 'I F D ITEM x InarBD Si � �� S �T{ '� ❑ JteD59oisalssgN TRANSMITTAL ❑ �DBL�C�IIE'M)NDrl�f I 903V'ME64N(MgTE _ +- Pr JTt BOB'AGEN�A REM'No. t MEETING DATE (CO blb iy0 ,# DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initial.of Originator) OMITS: PDC: FAHR: 11-13-96 F/tHR ALL 2220, Michael D. White, Ext. 2520 EXEC: _EXG •• """r .,.ej STEER: TEER'" ' S Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDs: ll-2D-96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Aaenda Wording: Consideration on the selection of the Districts' commercial bank. Recommended Action(,: Approve the selection of Union Bank of California to serve as the Districts' commercial bank for a three (3)year period commencing on January 1, 1997 with the Districts' option to renew for an additional two (2) years thereafter. CEQAREVIEW: Prolectis Exempt NOTAPPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on N/A Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination filed on BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR. YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES Roue Bwse FW.mermen) Schedule/Line Its.: NIA N/A N/A NIA AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedule/Line Its.: AIT/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT N/A N/A N/A N/A WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE If YES,slate number: _Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES, ATTACHMENTS /// Afx/� ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) �,� � �,�27 To Committee: 1. AtlachmentA Signat re —ale Divis' In Maine ( e i ne ) /° 2/ S' lure ate To Jt. Bds.: 1. Attachment A epanm11ent Head(Or Designee) Sig& re Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS ' Meeting Date: Approved: Amended' Fon,varded to: Additional Information: Background Prior to the Orange County bankruptcy In December of 1994.the County Treasurer reviewed and signed the accounts payable and payroll warrants of the Districts,transferred funds from the Districts' investment funds held with the County into the Districts' designated bank account with Bank of America, and reconciled the Bank of America bank account statement against the Districts'investment funds with the County. Following the County bankruptcy,the Board of Directors authorized the Districts'Finance Director to serve as the Districts'Treasurer and to establish the policies, systems, and procedures necessary for performing all cash management functions in-house. This process had to be completed in a relatively short period of time in order for the Districts to be able to pay claims on Districts' check stock. In order to expedite the process, commercial banking services were sole sourced in January 1995 to Bank of America,the bank that was already familiar with our size and banking needs. Staff has now completed a competitive bid process to ensure that all of the Districts'commercial banking needs have been addressed and that these services are being obtained at the lowest possible cost to the Districts. Proposal For Commercial Banking Services In September 1996, Susan Cotton, of Money Matters, Inc.,was contracted to perform a cash management review of the Districts' operations, develop a request for proposal (RFP)for commercial banking services, send RFPs to qualified banks in close proximity to the Districts, respond to questions submitted by bidders, structure and participate in interviews of short-list candidates, and prepare comparative evaluation of bids for the Districts' review and final selection. Ms. Cotton is a Certified Cash Manager and was previously aVice-President with First interstate Bank and oversaw the Bank's Government Unit. Following the review of the cash management operations,the RFP was developed and released on September 12, 1996. Listed below is a table on the schedule for the selection of a commercial bank: Activ Date Due Date For Vendor Questions September 20, 1996 Release of Responses to Vendor Questions Week of September 23, 1996 Proposal Due Date October 4, 1996 Bank Interviews Week of October 14, 1996 Finalist Notified Week of October 21, 1996 Recommendation to Finance Committee November 13, 1996 Bank Award by Joint Boards November 20, 1996 Commencement of Contract January 1, 1997 The request for proposal was submitted to five regional commercial banks that were in close proximity to the Districts. These five banks consisted of Bank of America, Sanwa Bank, Sumitomo Bank of California, Union Bank of California, and Wells Fargo Bank. All five banks submitted proposals to the Districts for consideration. These proposals were reviewed by the Districts' Director of Finance, Controller, Finance Manager, and Ms. Cotton. Based upon these reviews, it was determined that Sumitomo Bank and Wells Fargo Bank should not be considered any further for the following reasons: H:\WP.DTAIFINMIOCRANEIFPC.MTGTAHR.96WOVAIT AHR96.W Page 2 of Revision: 828M Sumitomo Bank- • It was determined that Sumitomo was not an approved State depository. • No Government Services Unit,just one person who handles public agency accounts. • Proposal did not indicate the bank's ability to provide for two requisite cash management services, end of the day sweep account or positive pay. • The RFP requested five references, but only two were provided. Wells Fargo- • No Government Services Unit dedicated to serving public agency clients. • Concerns on the impacts to customers on the acquisition/conversion with First Interstate Bank. • Wells Fargo's proposal was the highest pricing of the five banks. Recommended Vendor For Commercial Bankino Services Bank interviews for the three finalists were conducted on Wednesday, October 16, by the Controller, Finance Manager, and Ms. Cotton. It was at these interviews that staff discovered that Sanwa's sweep account service was actually an infra-day sweep, requiring controlled disbursements on a bank account address in the State of Tennessee, as opposed to an end of the day sweep whereby any excess of funds are automatically transferred into an overnight investment such as a repurchase agreement or U.S. Treasury obligations. Sanwa's intra-day sweep service in essence defeats the purpose of utilizing such a cash management service. In addition, Sanwa's fees were the highest of the three remaining banks. Of the two remaining banks, Bank of America and Union Bank of California were very comparable in the fact that both maintained Government Services Groups and offered end-of-day sweeps and positive pay services. However,there were three main factors that identified Union Bank of California as the best bank for providing commercial banking services to the Districts. Union Bank of California's fees were the lowest of all proposing vendors, and their end-of-the-day sweep account offers two investing options, overnight repurchase agreements that are backed with U.S. Treasury securities and are collateralized at 102 percent or a Treasury Money Market Fund that is rated AAA for credit quality by both Standard and Poor's and Moody s. Bank of America currently offers only the overnight repurchase agreement option. But the most compelling reason is that Union Bank of California can guarantee same day acceptance on all warrants issued by the County to the Districts because County checks are drawn against Union Bank of California. Staff estimates that the Districts'lose approximately$49,000 a year in interest because the County insists on disbursing all property tax and user fee apportionment by warrant instead of by electronic disbursement (wire transferring of funds). Since the County does not disburse these warrants until late morning or early afternoon on Fridays,the Districts' lose three days of interest because d takes a minimum of one banking day before County checks drawn on another bank are accepted. Included in Attachment A is a listing of the 19 most important factors used in developing a comparative analysis between the three finalist banks. As shown within this attachment, Union Bank of California is rated the best on 10 of these factors and tied as the best on another 4. The second alternative, Bank of America, is rated the best on 3 of these factors and is tied as the best on another 5. Staff therefore recommends the selection of Union Bank of California to serve as the Districts'commercial bank for a three (3)year period commencing on January 1, 1997 with the Districts'option to renew for an additional two (2) years thereafter. Mw c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations H:1WP.OTATIN%MiO CRANETPC.MTGIFAHR.a OVAITIFAHR%.68 Page 3 of 3 Revision: 648,96 ATTACHMENT A County Sanitation Districts of Orange County - Banking Services RFP (Comparative Analysis of Bids) October 22, 1996 ti' - t •h• 2 1 • f Estimated Mon**Cost $1.079 $1,045 $1,119 Union Cost w/ Hard $ Fees $1.057 $1,045 $1,119 Union (2% discount) Pricing Guarantee 3 - 5 years 3 years 3 years BofA Account Analysis Settlement Maybe Annual Monthly Annual Sanwa Earnings Credit Rate Calculation 91 Day T-Bill 91 Day T-Bill less 91 Day T-Bill BofA/ .10% Sanwa September. 1996 ECR 5,08% 4.98% 5.06% BofA Estimated Set-Up Costs $0 $400 $450+ BofA Conversion Allowance $1,000 $1,200 $1,000 Union Account Housed At: Corp. Center Govt. Services Local Branch Union Costa Mesa Los Angeles Huntington Beach # of Govt. Clients 1,000 (est.) 300 ? - small clientele BofA/ Union Govt. Services Group? Yes Yes No BofA/ Union End-of-Day Sweep Available? Yes Yes No BofA/ Union Type of Sweep Funds Repos Only Repos/Treas. N/A Union Indicative Sweep Rates 3.67% 4.6 - 5.5% N/A Union Orange County Check Solution? No Yes No Union Branch Cut-off on Fridays 7 pm 10 pm 6 pm Union Quality of Proposal Good Excellent Fair- Good Union Deficiencies of Banks -Low Sweep Yield -Bill Hill Retiring -No Auto. Sweep Union -Weak Branch -No Govt. Group Connection -No Depth in Market -Cash Mgmt.not as strong Benefits to CSDOC - Existing Bank - Best Pricing - Good Local Branch BofA/ Union - No Conversion - Best Proposal - Some Clients in OC - Many Branches - OC Check Clearing Solution For Btl SecU o ' - AGENDA FCOMR .REMION Mal ITEM CUSSI TRANSMITTAL ENT) NENT7RING aDS.MEETING DATE T.BDS.AGENDA REM N0. MEETING DATE cOMM. DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Inilials of Ongmati OMTS'. ONM PDC: PDC FAHR: 11/13/96 FAR ALL 2220, Michael D. White, 2520 EXEC: EXEC STEER: STEER Division No.,Name,and Extension JTGOS: 11/20/96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONjSj: Agenda Wording: Consideration of motion to receive, approve and file the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1996 that was prepared by staff and audited by Moreland &Associates, Certified Public Accountants; the annual Management Letter; the Auditor's Report to the Finance, Administrative and Human Resources Committee; and the Appropriations Limit Report; and forward the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to the Executive Committee. Recommended Action(s): Staff recommends the Committee receive, approve and file the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1996 and forward it to the Joint Boards. CEOA REVIEW: Project Is Exempt NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM: Dale Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Dedaration Approved on N/A Final EIR Approved on and Notice of Determination fled on BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENT YEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED All N/A BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: WA EXPENDITURES M.a 1W-inni1.., Schedulef-me Item: WA AMOUNT OF TRANSFER:N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA SchedulerLine Item:N/A AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AM N/A N/A I N/A N/A WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NIA REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTIONS NO If YES,stale number _Permanent Limited Tenn If YES.explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRE CES• ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) r/ %v L /o/Z9/y(. To Committee: 1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Red ' Siggnature Date for the year ended June 30, 1996. Div9 r esigneeo 2. Annual Management Letter. 3. Staffs Responses to the Annual 10 2j 4>° Management Letter. A@Iature Date 4. Auditor's Report to the F.A.H.R. epartment Aad (Or Designee) Committee. r 5. Appropriations Limit Report. S"tum sie 9 lure Date To A. Bds.: 1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) for the year ended June 30, 1996. 2. Annual Management Letter. 3. Staffs Responses to the Annual Management Letter. 4. Auditor's Report to the F.A.H.R. Committee. 5. Appropriations Limit Report OMTS COMM. PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Meeting Date: Approved Amended: Forwarded to: Summary: The Districts' independent auditors, Moreland &Associates, have completed their examination of the Districts'financial statements for the year ended June 30, 1996 and have again issued an unqualified opinion on the Districts' financial statements. Each year, the FAHR Committee reviews the results of the audit and the corresponding management letter. Michael Moreland, Partner, and Chuck Acocello, Senior Manager, will attend the meeting to respond to any questions of Directors. This year, staff has again prepared the a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that incorporates the audited financial statements. This report, including the audited financial statements, were completely prepared in-house. For the last two years, the Districts' has earned the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). This year's report will again be submitted to GFOA for their review in anticipation of another award. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, including the auditor's opinion letter, the management letter, staffs responses to the management letter, the Auditor's report to the FAHR, and the Auditor's Appropriations Limit Report are attached. If you should have any questions prior to the meeting, please call Gary Streed at(714)962-2411, ext.2500; or Mike White, ext. 2520. Staff and the auditors will make a brief presentation at the meeting. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Committee receive, approve and file the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1996 and forward H to the Joint Boards. c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager C:IWPDATAT-AHRt96CAFR.AR Page 2 of 2 Revision: WOO 12D1 DOVE STREET,SUITE M V NEWPORT BEACH.CALIFORNIA 926E9 M oreland &,Wjjoet L ek (714)221-0 26 CERTIFIED PUBUC ACCOUNTANTS 2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD.SUITE 150 CARLSBAD,CALIFORNIA 92 (619)431-M76 September 6, 1996 The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92827-8127 The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee: We have audited the combined financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) for the year ended June 30, 1996, and have issued our report thereon dated September 6, 1996. Under generally accepted auditing standards, we are providing you the attached information related to our audit Our responsibility under generally accepted auditing standards is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable,but not absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatement and are fairly presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of the concept of reasonable assurance and because we did not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material errors, irregularities, or illegal acts, including fraud and defalcations, may exist and not be detected by us. In addition, we considered the internal control structure of the Districts. Such considerations were solely for the purpose of determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such internal control structure. Significant Accounting_Policies The significant accounting policies of the Districts are described in Note 1 to the combined financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during the year. We noted no significant, unusual transactions during the year, or transactions for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. Management Judgments and Accounting_Estimates Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management's current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. The judgments and estimates which may significantly The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation V Districts of Orange County September 6, 1996 Page 2 effect the District's combined financial statements include establishing appropriate reserves for material liabilities such as general liability and workers' compensation claims. During our audit of the combined financial statements, we performed procedures to determine the reasonableness of the estimates used by management. These procedures included but were not limited to reviewing a third party administrator's report summarizing the liability needed for claims against the Districts' and inquiries of the Districts' Attorney. Based on these and other procedures performed, we were able to conclude that the liabilities recorded by management were reasonable. Significant Audit Adjustments As a result of our audit related testwork, we proposed no corrections of the financial statements that, in our judgment, either individually or in the aggregate, had a significant effect on the Districts' financial reporting process. Other Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements Our responsibility for other information in documents containing the Districts'combined financial statements and our report thereon does not extend beyond financial information identified in our report, and we have no obligation to perform any procedures to corroborate other information contained in these documents. We have, however, read the other information included in the Districts' comprehensive annual financial report; and no matters came to our attention that cause us to believe that such information, or its manner of presentation, is materially inconsistent with the information, or its manner of presentation, appearing in the financial statements. Disagreements With Management There were no disagreements with management on financial accounting and reporting matters that, if not satisfactorily resolved, would have caused a modification to our report on the Districts' 1996 financial statements. Consultation With Other Accountants We are not aware of any instances where management has consulted with or obtained opinions, written or oral, from other independent accountants during the past year that were subject to the requirements of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 50, Reports on the Application of Accounting Principles. The Finance, Administration and v Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County September 6, 1996 Page 3 Major Issues Discussed With Management Prior to Retention We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the Districts' auditors. These discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship. This information is intended solely for the use of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee and the Joint Board of Directors of the Districts, and should not be used for any other purpose. However,we understand that this document may be public information. a V ea November 13, 1996 MEMORANDUM TO: Finance, Administration and Human Resource Committee FROM: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: Management Letter Comments for the Year Ended June 30, 1996 As a part of their engagement, Moreland &Associates was asked to prepare a management letter for your review. The purpose of a management letter is to comment upon, and to make recommendations that may improve intemal controls or other phases of financial operations. The letter has been completed and is enclosed. This memo will supplement the comments with staffs understanding of the recommendations and will advise the Committee of any actions taken or being taken to implement the recommendations where appropriate. Staff is pleased to report that the auditors noted no matters that they considered to be of a material weakness. Investments The auditors noted that current investment procedures of the Districts' only include the review of monthly investment reports prepared by Mellon Trust, the Districts' custodian bank, to ensure that the prior month's ending balance was properly carried forward as the beginning balance of the following month's report, and that the reported transactions were in conformance to the Districts' investment policy. The auditors also recommended that the Districts obtain and retain broker/dealer confirmation notices for all investment transactions as evidence of reported investment transactions. Staff concurs with the Auditors recommendation and have now contacted the Districts' investment managers, Pacific Investment Management Company, requiring them to notify all broker/dealers who provide services on the purchase or sale of securities on behalf of the Districts' account to provide confirmation notices on all completed transactions directly to the Districts. In addition, staff will reconcile these notices against the Mellon Trust report at month end. CSOOC 0 P 0 Box 8127 0 Fountain Valle,CA 92728 8127 0 1714)962 2<t t V Management Letter for the Year Ended June 30, 1996 Page 2 November 13, 1996 Treasurer's Report and Investment Policy The Auditors noted that the Treasurers Reports for the last half of the fiscal year 1995-96 did not comply with the reporting requirements of California Government Code Section 53646, effective January 1, 1996 and recommended that the Districts' comply with California Government Code Section 53646; and that the annual investment policy to the Board of Directors was not rendered within the required time frame of one year. As of the October Treasurer's Report, the Districts' were in compliance with the reporting requirements of the Calffomia Government Code Section 53646, which includes: • a statement of the Districts' ability to meet expenditure requirements for the subsequent six months. • rendering the Treasurer's report to the Board of Directors within thirty days of month end. • reporting on all cash and investments held by the Districts including amounts held with the County of Orange, the amounts held in the worker's compensation bank account, and amounts within the Districts' deferred compensation account. The Districts' Treasurer will also ensure that the next annual investment policy will be rendered to the Board of Directors within the required time frame of one year, or by September 1997. C:1W PDATA\FAHRW GTLTRSP.AIT 1201 DOVE STREET.SUITE 680 V r �J� � ��/� NEWPORT BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92660 M oreland C�eXYOOQ(/AALG{ (714)221-0035 CERTFIED PUBUC ACCOUNTANTS 2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD.SUITE 150 CARLSBAD.CALIFORNIA 92009 (619)431 8476 September 6, 1996 The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92827-8127 The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee: We have audited the combined financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) as of and for the year ended June 30, 1996, and have issued our report thereon dated September 6, 1996. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free of material misstatement. In planning and performing our audit of the combined financial statements of the Districts for the year ended June 30, 1996, we considered its internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the combined financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. The management of the Districts is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal control structure policies and procedures. The objectives of an internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of combined financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate. The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation V Districts of Orange County September 6, 1996 Page 2 Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might be material weaknesses under the standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the specific internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the combined financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing then assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control structure and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above. However,we noted the following matters of less significance involving the internal control structure. INVESTMENTS During our testing of investment transactions, we noted that the Districts place heavy reliance on their custodial agent to properly post all investment transactions to the custodial records. Current investment procedures include reviewing monthly investment reports prepared by the custodial agent to ensure that the prior month's ending balance was properly carried forward as the beginning balance in the subsequent month's report, and the reported transactions were in conformance to the Districts' investment policy. The Districts do not obtain and compare broker/dealer confirmations to the reported investment transactions to ensure proper posting of the transaction. We recommend the Districts obtain and retain broker/dealer confirmation notices for all investment transactions as evidence of reported investment transactions. TREASURER'S REPORTS AND INVESTMENT POLICY We noted that the March, April, May and June 1996 Treasurer's Reports and the annual Investment Policy did not comply with California Government Code Section 53646, effective January 1, 1996 as follows: 1. The Treasurer's Reports did not include a statement of the Districts' ability to meet expenditure requirements for the subsequent sit months. 2. The Treasurer's Reports were not rendered to the Board of Directors within thirty days of month end. 3. The Treasurer's Reports did not report all cash and investments held by the Districts. The excluded information included: a. the cash balance held by the County of Orange in the Orange County Investment Pool; The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee v of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County September 6, 1996 Page 3 b. the cash balance in the workers' compensation account; and C. the deferred compensation account balance. 4. An annual investment policy was not rendered to the Board of Directors within one year of the previous policy. (The previous policy was effective May 24, 1995 and the replacement policy was prepared for submittal to the Board in September 1996.) We recommend the Districts' Treasurer's Reports be prepared and rendered in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646. We also recommend that the annual investment policy be rendered to the Board of Directors within the required time frame of one year. This report is intended for the information of management and the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Districts. This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record. We would like to express our appreciation for the courtesy and assistance extended to us during our audit by all of your staff. We would be pleased to discuss with you at your convenience the matters contained in this letter or any other matters which you would like to discuss. 1201 DOVE STREET.SUITE 6B0 V ��/�/� NEWPORT BEACH.CALIFORNIA 926W Moreland &,Wj000CQ.&a, (714)221-0025 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD,SUITE 150 CARLSBAD.CALIFORNIA 92009 (619)431 8476 September 6, 1996 The Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Independent Accountants' Report on A egr ed-Upon Procedures Applied to Appropriations Limit Worksheets We have applied the procedures enumerated below to the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet No. 6 (or other alternative computation) for each of the County Sanitation Districts #1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County (Districts) for the year ended June 30, 1996. These procedures, which were agreed to by the Districts and the League of California Cities (as presented in the League publication entitled Article XHIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines)were performed solely to assist the Districts in meeting the requirements of Section 1.5 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution. This engagement to apply agreed-upon procedures was performed in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The sufficiency of the procedures is solely the responsibility of the specified users of the report. Consequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described below either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other purpose. The procedures performed and our findings were as follows: 1. We obtained the completed worksheets No. 1 through No. 7 (or other alternative computations) and determined that the limit and annual adjustment factors were adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. We also determined that the population and inflation options were selected by a recorded vote of the Board of Directors. 2. For the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet No. 6, we added line A, last year's limit, to line E, total adjustments, and agreed the resulting amount to line F, this year's limit. 3. We agreed the current year information presented in the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet No. 6 to the other worksheets described in No. I above. 4. We agreed the prior year appropriations limit presented in the accompanying y Appropriations Limit worksheet No. 6 to the prior year appropriations limit adopted by the Board of Directors during the prior year. We were not engaged to, and did not, perform an audit, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion on the accompanying Appropriations Limit worksheet No. 6 (or other alternative computation). Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Had we performed additional procedures,other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. This report is intended solely for the use of the Districts and should not be used by those who have not agreed to the procedures and taken responsibility for the sufficiency of the procedures for their purposes. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited /, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,DISTRICT#1 u APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WORKSHEET#6 FY 1995-96 BUDGET AMOUNT A. LAST YEAR'S LIMIT $2,628,147 B. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 1. Population% .28% 2. Inflation% 4.72% Total Adjustment% C. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT $131,853 D. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS: Assumed Responsibility (Lost Responsibility) (Transfer to Private) (Transfer to Fees) Sub—total 0 E. TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $131,853 F. CURRENT YEAR LIMIT 2,760,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,DISTRICT#2 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WORKSHEET#6 W FY 1995-96 BUDGET AMOUNT A. LAST YEAR'S LIMIT $9,897,392 B. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 1. Population% 1.77% 2. Inflation% 4.72% Total Adjustment% C. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT $650,608 D. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS: Assumed Responsibility (Lost Responsibility) (Transfer to Private) (Transfer to Fees) Sub—total 0 E. TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $650,608 F. CURRENT YEAR LIMIT $10,548,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,DISTRICT#3 u APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WORKSHEET#6 FY 1995-96 BUDGET AMOUNT A. LAST YEAR'S LIMIT $13,605,671 B. ADJUSTMENTFACTORS 1. Population% 1.92% 2. Inflation% 4.72% Total Adjustment% C. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT $915,329 D. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS: Assumed Responsibility (Lost Responsibility) (Transfer to Private) (Transfer to Fees) Sub—total 0 E. TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $915,329 F. CURRENT YEAR LIMIT $14,521,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,DISTRICT#5 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WORKSHEET#6 FY 1995-96 BUDGET AMOUNT A. LAST YEAR'S LIMIT $2,460,324 B. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 1. Population% 1.08% 2. Inflation% 4.72% Total Adjustment% C. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT $143,676 D. OTITER ADJUSTMENTS: Assumed Responsibility (Lost Responsibility) (Transfer to Private) (Transfer to Fees) Sub—total 0 E. TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $143,676 F. CURRENT YEAR LIMIT $2,604,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,DISTRICT#6 v APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WORKSHEET#6 FY 1995-96 BUDGET AMOUNT A. LAST YEAR'S LIMIT $1,590,171 B. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 1. Population% 1.45% 2. Inflation% 4.72% Total Adjustment% C. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT $98,829 D. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS: Assumed Responsibility (Lost Responsibility) (Transfer to Private) (Transfer to Fees) Sub—total 0 E. TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $98,829 F. CURRENT YEAR LINUT $1,689,000 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,DISTRICT#7 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WORKSHEET#6 a FY 1995-96 BUDGET AMOUNT A. LAST YEAR'S LIMIT $4,366�55 B. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 1. Population% 5.08% 2. Inflation% 4.72% Total Adjustment% 10.04% C. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT 438,445 D. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS: Assumed Responsibility (Lost Responsibility) (Transfer to Private) (Transfer to Fees) Sub—total 0 E. TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS 438,445 F. CURRENT YEAR LIMIT $4 805 00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,DISTRICT#11 • APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT WORKSHEET#6 FY 1995-96 BUDGET AMOUNT A. LAST YEAR'S LIMIT $2,992,414 B. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 1. Population% .27% 2. Inflation% 1 4.72% Total Adjustment% C. ANNUALADJUSTN= $149,586 D. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS: Assumed Responsibility (Lost Responsibility) (Transfer to Private) (Transfer to Fees) Sub—total 0 E. TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $149,586 F. CURRENT YEAR LIMIT $3,142,000 u �'rv, wF'. t) " FoA�Gd96aYus to fu 444 L� }" �Yirj �t,'r AGENDA � akJ f _ 7F t ITEM ❑ cti s sr I,i �4 i r rr "m ', ,fit r? TRANSMITTAL ) t�o&11M nFEt1[f(TOATE MEETING DATE TjCOMM$IUNOI. )i DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION (Initials of Originator) OMITS: txfrOAlT&b :Is: FAHR: 11/13/96 .FAHRR „ it ALL 2220, Michael D. White, 2520 EXEC: 11 IXEC 7 ' ' STEER: i. J1TErER 3�:n Division No.,Name,and Extension JT.BDS: 11/20/96 AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: Consideration of motion to review, approve and file the Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter Ended September 30, 1996. Recommended Action(s): Staff recommends that the Committee review, approve and forward the 1995-96 Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter Ended September 30, 1996 to the Joint Boards. CEQA REVIEW: Protect is Exempt: NOT APPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approved on NIA Final SIR Approved on and Notice of Determination filed on BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENTYEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO-DATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT, $ BUDGET AMOUNT TO-DATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CUFF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES UdaleWyalylWTR dem) SchedulefiUm.Nam: N/A N/A N/A N/A AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Schedula line Item: AITIPROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREY. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED AIT N/A N/A N/A N/A WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NOT APPLICABLE If YES,state number. _Permanent Limited Term If YES,explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section COVEN S: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) , To Committee: 1. Financial and Operational Report for the SS'gn ture Date Quarter Ended September 30, 1996. Division Manager( r ' nee) C Sig ature Date To Jt. Bds.: 1. Financial and Operational Report for the De rtment ed (Or Designee) Quarter Ended September 30, 1996. /�®,..�, Cdce4.K /6�3I�4G Si ture Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) OMTS COMM. PDC.COMM. :'FAHRCOMM ilO1NT'B43'ARDs. . M9�r�ig'Dete-. � '•;9 a s.,�;: Ap t q Attached, in a separately bound document, Is the Districts' First Quarter Financial and Operational Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1996. This report is a consolidation of both the financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts'as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 1996-97. Contained within this report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating,the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, individual District Funds, and the Self-Insurance Funds. Also contained within this report is the status of the divisional performance objectives and workplan milestones identified in the 1996-97 Approved Budget. As indicated within the Overview Section of this report,24.06 percent or$11,717,772 of the 1996-97 net joint operating budget of$48.7 million has been expended. Although net costs have increased 5.49 percent in comparison with the same period last year, the Districts'are still at 24.06 percent of the budget. The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 1996 is$524 based on flows of 22,345 million gallons. This is$32 or 5.76 percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of$556. IA c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager C:\wPDATATAHR11 STQTRPT AIT Page 2 of 2 Revision: a28MG a exxealHFo rcp =, +r AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL MEETING DATE DISTRICT NO. CONTACT FOR INFORMATION _(Inthalsof Originator) OMITS: POC: FAHR: ALL Thomas L.Woodruff EXEC: F. STEER t;;'.. Division No.,Name,aM Extension JT.BDS:11/4XV96 y AGENDA WORDING AND RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): Agenda Wording: APPROVE REVISED SAWPA CONTINUING GUARANTEE AGREEMENT. Recommended Action(s): Adopt Resolution approving a Continuing Guarantee of the Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement with SAWPA and each of its five (5) member agencies. CEQA REVIEW: Project is Exempt: NOTAPPLICABLE DATE OF MOST RECENT BOARD ACTION ON THIS SPECIFIC REM: Date Notice of Exemption Filed: Negative Declaration Approvee on 0724/96 Final EIR Appmved on_and Notice of Determiretien filed on BUDGET INFORMATION CURRENT YEAR CURRENTYEAR- YEAR-TO43ATE REVISED BUDGET TOTAL BUDGETED AMT.: $ BUDGETAMOUNT T043ATE BUDGET BALANCE TOTAL SOURCE: CORF JO DISTRICTS EXPENDITURES !form suase P'+u Tim) Sche,lule/Llne Hem: Na n/a n/a Na AMOUNT OF TRANSFER: Sc ncuafum Item: AR/PROJECT COST INFORMATION ORIGINAL BID,PO, CHANGE ORDERS, AMOUNT AMENDED PROJECT CONTRACT FUNDS PREV. REQUESTED THIS AMOUNT AMOUNT APPROVED Am Na Na We Na WILL PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? NO YES REQUIRES BOARD POLICY ACTION? NO YES NOT APPLICABLE If YES,stalenumber _Permanent Urnie6Tenn IfYES.explain in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION section CONCURRENCES: ATTACHMENTS TO AGENDA(List) To Committee: 1. Signature Date Division Manager(Or Designee) Signature Date To Lt. Bds.: 1. Memorandum from Department Head (Or Designee) General Counsel dated November 13, 1996 Signature Date Assistant General Manager(Or Designee) OMTS COMM. � " PDC COMM. FAHR COMM. JOINT BOARDS Moeling Date:.: .Approved ._ Amended. Folwardod to: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION(Beckg=M andlor Summery) Original Agreement has been previously approved. Non substantive revisions to the included Continuing Guarantee have been made and require approval by the Boards. TLW:jg c: Department Head AGM-Administration AGM-Operations General Manager JIWPDOCW%AG98WOV%ASAWPAArT Page 2 of 2 Reftim: 84596 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1996 53\51RICTS of t�O� °Rqy z � o a 1 o��nNc THe t�A°�� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 Prepared By. Department of Finance Accounting Division Michael D. White ,., Controller U u u u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) U u u u u u u u u u u u u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents For the Year Ended June 30, 1996 Pace INTRODUCTORY SECTION: Letterof Transmittal..................................................................................................................... i GFOA Certificate of Achievement................................................................................................ ix Boardof Directors........................................................................................................................ x OrganizationChart....................................................................................................................... A Mapof Service Area..................................................................................................................... x1i FINANCIAL SECTION: Independent Auditors' Report....................................................................................................... 1 Combined Financial Statements(General Purpose Financial Statements): Combined Balance Sheets.................................................................................................. 4-5 Combined Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in RetainedEarnings ........................................................................................................... 6 Combined Statements of Cash Flows................................................................................. 7-8 Notes to Financial Statements..................................................................................................... 9-27 COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet................................................................................................... 30-31 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in RetainedEarnings....... ................................................. .................................................. 3243 Combining Statement of Cash Flows.................................................................................. 34-35 STATISTICAL SECTION: Expenses by Type-Last Ten Fiscal Years.................................................................................. 37 Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source-Last Ten Fiscal Years....................................... 38 Property Tax Levies and Collections-Last Ten Fiscal Years...................................................... 39 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property- LastTen Fiscal Years..................................... ......................................................................... 40 Property Tax Rates-Direct and Overlapping Governments- LastTen Fiscal Years............................................................................................................... 411 PrincipalUsers............................................................................................................................. 42 Ratio of Annual Debt Service-Last Ten Fiscal Years................................................................. 43 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt.............................................................................. 44 Bond Coverage- Last Ten Fiscal Years...................................................................................... 45 DemographicStatistics ................................................................................................................ 46 Property Values, Construction and Bank Deposits- LastTen Fiscal Years............................................... ............................................................... 47 Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Served by The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County.............................................................. 48 Insurancein Force...................................... .......... ..... ................................................................ 49 Comparison of Volume of Wastewater Treated With Expenses by Type-Lost Ten Fiscal Years 50 Biosolids;Produced-Last Ten Fiscal Years ............................................... ................................ 51 Miscellaneous Statistics............................................................................................................... 52 u u u u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INiENflONALLY BLANK) u u u u u u u u u u u u u u Introductory Section For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1996 r r r � r Z Q Q r 0 Z r N (p r ff. � r r t r r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Phone: n7`14l 962 2411 September 22, 1996 nailing add.: P.O.B.6127 Tbuntain Valle,M 9272BB127 Honorable Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts sil 8tltlirad of Orange County -etB44 Ellis Avenue 9 ty n Valley,G 9270 7019 Submitted herewith is the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996. This report includes all of the individual District funds and was prepared by the Accounting Division of the Districts' Finance Department. Responsibility of both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, Member including all disclosures, rests with the Districts. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed 8 � data are accurate in all material respects and are reported in a manner designed to present fairly the _ financial position and results of operations of the Districts. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader cwaa to gain an understanding of the Districts'financial activities have been included. Anaheim area The report presented herewith consists of three parts: (1) an introductory section consisting of a letter of Buena Pare transmittal, a list of principal officials, a Districts' organization chart, and a map of the individual Districts; Fbun �yye,la (2)a financial section consisting of the independent auditors' report, general purpose financial statements, Fullerton and combining statements of the individual District Enterprise Funds; and (3) a statistical section Huntington Beach consisting of pertinent financial and nonfinancial data that presents historical trends and other information rrvine L. Habra about the Districts. Le Palma Lae Alamitos Included within the accompanying financial statements are all of the organizations, activities, and functions Nowport Beach controlled by the Districts' Boards of Directors in accordance with the Governmental Accounting Orange Standards Board Statement Number 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity". For the purpose of this Placentia P 9 t1'" P Santo Are evaluation, control was determined by the Boards' responsibility for: (1) adoption of the budgets and user Saal Beach charges, (2) taxing authority, and (3) establishment of policies. The reporting entity and its services are Blanton described in further detail in Note 1 of the financial statements. Tul n Villa Perk YaMe Linos t -�nty of orange GOVERNMENTAL'STRUCTURE The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, incorporated in 1954, encompasses the Northern sanitary Districts section of Orange County. The Districts provide wastewater treatment for an area of the County covering Goya Mesa 470 square miles and serving a population of 2,260,825, or approximately 86%of the County's population. Garden Brove Mmway Grey The Districts are made up of nine separate public corporations. Each District is governed by a oiatriooa representative from each city or sanitary district within the District, and a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each District has its own budget and is responsible for the construction and _hi Ranch maintenance of its own collection system. All Districts, except Districts 13 and 14, receive their own share of the 1% ad valorem property tax levy. In addition, all Districts except District 14, collect user fees from property owners. District 14 receives contributions from user fees collected by the Irvine Ranch Water District. i A Public Wastewater and Environmencel Management Agency committed to Pmlacting we Environment Since 1954 u u The purpose of the Districts' wastewater management program is to protect the public's health, preserve the beneficial uses of the coastal waters, and maintain air quality. The objectives of operating the u treatment plants are to process and dispose of the treated wastewater and the separated solids in accordance with Federal, state, and local laws including the Environmental Protection Agency. The Districts sewerage system includes approximately 630 miles of sewers that convey wastewater generated within the Districts' boundaries to the Districts' two wastewater treatment plants, Reclamation Plant No. 1 located in the City of Fountain Valley, and Treatment Plant No. 2 located in the City of i I Huntington Beach. Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity of 108 million gallons per day (mgd). Treatment Plant No. 2's designed primary treatment capacity is 186 mgd. Approximately 50% of the advanced primary effluent also receives secondary treatment. Both plants are master-planned for a future u primary and secondary treatment capacity of 240 mgd for a combined total of 480 mgd. Outflows of treated wastewater from the two plants are combined, disinfected, and discharged to the u ocean off the Huntington Beach coast through an outfall pipe that is 120 inches in diameter and approximately five miles long. The last mile of the outfall pipe is a diffuser that dilutes the wastewater with seawater in a ratio of 148 parts seawater to one part treated wastewater at an average depth of 185 feet. u ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK The County of Orange continues to show economic improvement from the 1990-93 recessionary period. I The Chapman Universitys School of Business Economic and Business Review predicts a moderate but u steady economic recovery. In their June 1996 report, 22,000 jobs were created in 1995 at a 1.9 percent rate of growth, and new dwelling units are forecasted to increase 25 percent from the 8,277 unit starts in 1995. However, the 1995-96 assessed value of taxable property within the Districts' boundaries decreased$1.5 billion, or 1.2 percent from the prior year. This decrease appears to be attributable to the four year recession and the time delays that occurred in the processing of property reassessment claims, and in the recognition of the decrease in the value of homes as a direct result of homes selling for less than market value. This downturn should begin to reverse as the increase in dwelling unit starts will lead u to higher residential valuation in 1996. Chapman University believes that housing prices at year-end 1996 will only be slightly higher than as of year-end 1995. Because of the slow economic turnaround and the continuing financial problems of member agencies, the Districts again declined to raise sewer use service fees for 1996-97 even though the costs of complying with stricter environmental and public health standards have continued to rise. However, even with the , decision not to increase user fees to match increasing operating costs, the Districts still managed to u maintain designated retained earnings of $386 million. Designated retained earnings have been earmarked by the Districts'Joint Boards for the following specific purposes: Designated For Operating Cashflow $ 30 million Designated For Operating Contingency 12 million I I Designated For Future Capital Expansion 50 million u Designated For Environmental Requirements 5 million Designated For Self-Insurance 243 million Designated For Debt Service Requirements 46 million Total Designated Retained Earnings $386 million U ii II MAJOR INITIATIVES Current Activities �-, During 1995-96,the Districts established a Communication Division of the General Manager's Department for the purpose of improving communications with employees as well as with external groups such as board members, the State and other local governments, the press, schools, and with the general public and businesses the Districts serve. Some of the internal communication program accomplishments d achieved during 1996-97 include the establishment of a Communications Action Team for the purpose of establishing long-lens communications programs, establishment of periodic communication surveys in order to help gauge employee morale and attitude and provide a basis on which to improve the Districts' internal communications efforts, and improvements to the employee newsletter, including in-depth articles, employee features,and high quality photographs. The 1994-95 review of Human Resources and Maintenance and Operations by Ernst& Young noted that the Districts lacked a coordinated process for planning, budgeting, assessing, tracking, evaluating, and reporting on training provided to the Districts' employees and recommended that more opportunities be provided in the areas of safety, technical, and management training. During 1995-96, the Districts initiated ,•, a comprehensive training program that included the development of specific training programs for the cross-training of operations and maintenance personnel, safety training, management and executive training, and secretarial and clerical training. This new comprehensive training program also provides for: 1e the coordination of all Districts'-wide training in Human Resources. • the establishment of an employee training advisory committee. • the preparation of an annual training calendar. e1 the development of a centralized training database for tracking and monitoring program results. During this past fiscal year, the Districts' completed an internal operational analysis on the Information Technology Division for the purpose of improving the Division's efficiency and effectiveness. This report identified the there currently was a lack of appropriate planning, organizing, directing, and managing of the various resources and responsibilities within the Information Technology Division. Recommendations to be implemented over the next fiscal year include: • The development of procedures to aid in the decision making on prioritizing work, establishing work assignments, assigning staff, developing task standards, and in ,m documenting the work performed. • Improvement in project planning and monitoring of all Information Technology projects. • The establishment of adequate workload data to assist in the Division's ability to thoroughly m plan, monitor and modify workload based on resources available. In February 1996, a productivity assessment of Districts' staffing, technology and business practices was conducted by EMA Services, Inc. The purpose of the assessment was to estimate the Districts' position e, relative to modem wastewater treatment practices. Based upon this preliminary review, the Districts' Operations and Maintenance Departments were found to have staffing levels slightly higher than those found in private-sector wastewater treatment facilities of comparable size. Results also indicated the Districts' need to improve workforce Flexibility through cross-training and to expedite plant automation. In order to make the Districts'operations more cost effective while increasing the level of efficiency to match that of the most efficient wastewater treatment facility in the industry, the Districts' Operations and Maintenance Departments will need to modernize business practices in the area of automation and cross- training, and reduce solids disposal, chemical usage and energy costs. Based on this assessment study, the following recommendations were implemented in 1995-96: iii u • Operations and Maintenance core mission divisions were combined into one department. • Solids disposal is now budgeted within Operations and Maintenance. • Cross-training on novice tasks is being implemented. • Pump power operators were cross-trained to reduce maintenance positions. • General Services Administration was established to expedite the implementation of Plant Automation. u Future Activities The Districts are still in the process of implementing many of the recommendations resulting from the EMA Services, Inc. productivity assessment study, including: • Development of a Competitiveness Action Plan and Multi-Divisional Team IJ • Complete plant automation work with the goal of eliminating approximately twelve operators. • Re-engineer and automate around new Operations and Maintenance business practices. • Develop maintenance and operations accountability. V • Cross-train tasks of operators and maintenance workers. • Integrate plant, lab and maintenance accounting automation. • Develop union/management cooperation. I The Districts have begun preparation for a new Strategic Plan which, after completion in 1998,will replace V the 1989 Master Plan. The Strategic Plan will project population and flows, and include a review of the collection, treatment, and disposal facilities. The Strategic Plan will include elements such as financing, a review of our ocean outfalls, an operations plan, and plant aesthetics. The work is being completed in L.I three phases as described below: Phase I (June 1996-July 1997) L • Investigating, cleaning,and repairing our primary and emergency ocean outfalls. i • Increasing capacity of existing ocean disposal system to avoid building a new ocean outfall. • Identifying ways to reduce peak flows at the two treatment facilities during storms. • Conducting a financial analysis to determine options for revising the Districts' policies in V regards to connection fees and user charges and in long term capital financing. Phase II (June 1996-August 1997) it • Analyzing treatment, reuse,and disposal in order to determine: • secondary treatment requirements. V • existing and future water reclamation requirements. • biosolids disposal options. Phase III(May 1997-August 1998) y • Public participation in the development of an environmental impact report on the Strategic Plan. This process will include the review of alternatives, soliciting input from special interest V groups, cities, regulators and the public to determine the best plan, and obtaining the approval from local regulatory agencies as to conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. In 1996-97, the Districts will be implementing a new financial information system to replace the existing system that was installed in the late 1970's. This new system will enable the Districts'to produce a wider L IV V variety of financial information, such as reporting costs either at the Divisional level or at the treatment _ - process level, and in a more expedient manner. Staff will also be redesigning the administrative business practices of the Districts in order to take full advantage of the latest technology offered from the new financial information system. m SERVICE EFFORTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Districts has received the 1996 Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) Research and Technology Award for the Pilot Digester project. This AMSA award is presented to the member agency that produces a technological innovation related to the wastewater or biosolids area. In an effort to become more accountable as to the performance of the organization, Work Plans were m developed in 1995-96 for managing the performance of each and every division throughout the organization. The first step in the Work Plan development process was to identify the critical goals to be accomplished in the upcoming year. Once these goals were defined, a series of sub-tasks were developed with lead responsibility assigned to either the Administration or the Operations sides of the organization. Work plans were then prepared at the Division level of the organization and were specifically designed to carry out the critical goals of the organization. This is a comerstone in the Districts' effort toward creating a more performance-based organization. Department Heads, Division ,m Heads, Managers, Supervisors, and Professionals will all be held accountable for delivering these goals and sub-tasks in accordance with the milestones set forth in the detailed work plans. At the end of the - next fiscal year, these employees will be evaluated on the basis of their performance on their Divisional work plans. ACCOUNTING AND BUDGETARY CONTROLS The Districts' accounting records are maintained on the accrual basis for all funds. In developing and evaluating the Districts' accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance ^• regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition; and (2) the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management We believe that the Districts' internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions. Each year the Districts' Board of Directors adopts an annual operating plan. Joint works' budgets are first prepared that identity the specific capital projects and operating activities to be undertaken by the Districts during the year. Upon adoption, Districts'staff allocates the joint works' budgets proportionately to each of r, the individual Districts and obtains individual District budget approval. The budgetary level of control, the level at which expenses cannot exceed budget, is exercised at the District, or fund level. All of the Districts have adopted a Uniform Purchasing Policy that identifies the agreed upon purchasing standards. m ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS m Enterprise funds are used to account for the operations of the Districts, which are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises. This allows the Districts to determine that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing wastewater management services on a continuing basis are financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Sewer service user fees are rb evaluated annually based primarily on budget requirements for total operation, maintenance and capital expenditures in providing wastewater management services. Property tax revenues are dedicated for the v L' payment of debt service. Comparative data covering the Districts enterprise operations over the past two fiscal years is as follows: � Amount of Percent of Increase Increase Revenues 1995-96 1994-95 (Decrease) (Decrease) Operating revenues $68,448,019 $70,532,273 $ (2,084,254) (2.96%) Operating expenses, y including depreciation 91,563258 89,384,941 2,178,317 2.44% Operating V income(loss) (23,115,239) (18,852,668) (41262,571) 22.61% Non-operating income, net 24,183,193 23,396.080 787,113 3.369/6 Net income $ 1,057,954 $ 4,543.412 $ (3,475,458) (76.49%) The decrease in operating revenues is reflective of the three percent Decrease in service charges and permit and inspection fees. The decline is a continuing reflection of the stagnant economy and the lack of any increases in service fees since 1991-92. The two percent increase in operating expenses is reflective V of the of the increasing costs of operations that is comparable with the increase in the consumer price index over the same period of time. The three percent increase in net non-operating income is primarily the result of a 9.2 percent, or $1.7 million Increase in interest earnings, a 7.3 percent, or$2.0 million decrease in property tax revenues, and a 13.4 percent, or $3.2 million decrease in interest expense. Most of these increases to non-operating income were offset by a $6.8 million increase in other non-operating expenses. Interest earnings increased as a result of (1) higher cash and investment balances which in total grew by $22.8 million primarily as a result of the increase in the collection of receivables, and (2)and as a result of the increase in higher yields, up 1.76 percent from the prior year to 5.97 percent Interest expense decreased as a result of the decreases in interest rates within the Districts' variable debt programs and as a result of the V decreases in long-term,debt. The increase in non-operating expense is primarily the result of the recognition of one liability claim totaling$5.5 million. 6.0 DEBT ADMINISTRATION b At June 30, 1996, the Districts had a number of debt issues outstanding. These issues, net of applicable unamortized discounts, included $406.6 million of certificates of participation and $45,000 of general obligation bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation VI and As rating from Moody's Investor Services. No new debt was issued in 1995-96 and no debt issuances are contemplated for 1996-97. CASH MANAGEMENT Ld The Districts' investment portfolio, except for the Districts' debt service reserves, the investments of the Districts' Deferred Compensation Program, investments with the State Local Agency Investment Fund, L vi L and ovemight repurchase agreements of idle cash within the Districts' general bank account, are managed by an outside money manager, Pacific Investment Management Company, who perform the daily invesbment activities, and by Mellon Trust, who serve as the Districts' independent custodian bank. This externally managed portfolio consists of a short term investment pool of $52,327,000 at June 30, 1996 that have maturities out to 180 days, and a long-term investment pool of $281,427,000 that have maturities out to five years. Investments of this externally managed investment portfolio consist of U.S. Government securities, corporate bonds, and commercial paper. Investments of the Districts' debt service reserves totaling $33.5 million consist of bank investment contracts of $19.1 million with Texas Commerce Bank and State Street Bank, maturing out to August 1, 2013, and $14.4 million in open-ended mutual funds. Investments of the Districts' Deferred Compensation Program are managed by Lincoln National Life Insurance Company in open-ended mutual funds. The yield on maturing investments averaged 5.97 percent during 1995.96, up 1.76 percent from the prior m year average of 4.21 percent. Interest earnings for the year were$20,209,000, while earnings in the prior fiscal year were$18,500,000, an increase of$1,709,000. As previously mentioned, this increase is a due to a combination of larger cash balances available for investment and higher yield on investments. RISK MANAGEMENT For the year ended June 30, 1996, the Districts were self-insured for workers' compensation, property damage and general liability. The self-insured portion for worker's compensation is$250,000 per person - per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other parts is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess 4+ insurance coverage to $200 million for fire, flood, and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquake is$250,000 or 5% per unit of insurance, which ever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to $30 million. The Districts also maintain outside comprehensive boiler and .. machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to$100,000. Up until June 30, 1996, the Districts were completely self-insured for general liability -. coverage. Effective July 1, 1996, the Districts acquired outside general liability insurance to $25 million with a self-insured portion of$100,000. r Districts' management believes that there are no outstanding claims as of June 30, 1996 that would materially affect the financial posifion of the Districts. INDEPENDENT AUDIT r An audit of the books, financial records and transactions of the Districts is conducted annually by independent certified public accountants. The Districts selected the accounting firm of Moreland & Associates to perform the audit for the year ended June 30, 1996. The auditors'.report on the Districts' combined financial statements and combining statements is included in the financial section of this report. r This report renders an unqualified opinion on the Districts' combined financial statements for the year ended June 30, 1996. CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE - IN FINANCIAL REPORTING " The Government Finance Officers' Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County for the Districts' comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended June 30, 1995. r This was the second consecutive year that the Districts has received this award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized vii L l u comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. V ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report could not have been accomplished without the dedicated services of the Accounting Division staff, and 1 would like to especially express my appreciation to Brad Cagle and Dan Evangelista who assisted in its preparation. I would also like to thank the Districts' Boards of Directors, the General l Manager, the Chief Administrative Officer and the Director of Finance for their interest and support in "j conducting the financial operations of the Districts in a responsible and progressive manner. Respectfully submitted, V Michael D. White, CPA y Controller L V b+ I ' L+ L� L V L vill I ! L r Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting r Presented to County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1995 A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada to government units and public employee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial r^ reports(CAFRs)achieve the highest _ standards in government accounting and financial reporting. r Xi I m yg � Preside mevam r Executive Director r ix u L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Board of Directors As of June 30, 1996 ALTERNATE AGENCY/CITIES ACTIVE DIRECTOR DISTRICT NOiSi. DIRECTOR V Anaheim Bob Zemel 2, 3913 Tom Daly Brea Burnie Dunlap' 2, 3& 13 Glenn Parker I Buena Park Don R. Griffin 3 Patsy Marshall* Y�I Cypress Walter K. Bowman* 3 Gail Kerry Fountain Valley John Collins 2&3 George Scott* i..l Fullerton Chris Norby 2&3 Don Bankhead Huntington Beach Victor Leipzig 3&11 Ralph Bauer Shirley Dettloff 11 Ralph Bauer N Irvine Barry Hammond 7& 14 Mike Ward' La Habra James H. Flom 2&3 Steve Anderson* V La Palma Wally Linn 3 Eva G. Miner Los Alamitos Charles E. Sylvia 3 Robert Wahlstrom• I Newport Beach John C. Cox, Jr. 5 Jan Debay v Jan Debay 5, 6&7 John C. Cox,Jr. Orange Mark A. Murphy 1,2, 7, 13& 14 Joanne Coontz' Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode 2 Carol Downey Santa Ana Pat McGuigan 1,2, 3&7 Ted R. Moreno Seal Seach George Brown 3 Gwen Forsythe• Stanton Sal A. Sapien 3 Harry M. Dotson Tustin Thomas R. Saltarelli 1, 7& 14 Jim Potts ' Villa Park Barry Denes 2 Bob Bell W Yorba Linda Daniel T. Welch 2 John M. Gullixson' John M. Gullixson' 13 Daniel T. Welch LI SanitaryMater Districts Costa Mesa Sanitary Dist. James M. Ferryman 1,6&7 Arthur Perry 6d Garden Grove Sanitary Dist. Sheldon S. Singer 2&3 George L. Zlaket 1 Midway City Sanitary Dist. Margie L. Rice 3 James V. Evans L Irvine Ranch Water District Peer A. Swan 14 Darryl G. Miller County Areas L County of Orange Roger R. Stanton 1,2, 3&11 William G. Steiner County of Orange William G. Steiner 5,6,7, 13& 14 Roger R. Stanton V "County Supervisor L x V County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Organization Chart r r r r r atiw. ,.. w..o r r r r r r r %I r LA HABRA �dCF ryTy BREA FULLE TON YORBA 1I� PLACENTIA LINDA J LA B PARK PALMA CYPRESS ANAN IM O VILLA STANTON PARK o LOS / ;ALAMITOS ORANGE GARDEN GROVE ESTMINSTER SE 7 SANTA O STIR ANA 14 FOUNTAIN VALLEY s HUNTINGTON q BEACH 4/y COSTA t MESA IRVINE o� I 1 CIA\ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF .. ..,, .n ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 xii Financial Section For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 199B r r d r n N CD n r _9 O r �' r �( 1A1 DOVE STnEET,SUITE axl �/� oreland &�.o�:,�teo, (714MTBEACH,CALIrOPNIA 92HFp I1�1■ p1a12P1m2s CEflaFlED P11eUC ACCOUMAMS 2111 PA OMM AIRPORT ROAD,SUITE 150 CMLS6AD.CA IFOHNIA 92ID9 (619)431d 76 September 6, 1996 The Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Independent Auditors'Report We have audited the accompanying combined financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California(Districts)as of and for the years ended June 30, 1996 and 1995, as listed in the '— accompanying table of contents. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the Districts' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall combined financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion,the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly,in all material respects, the financial position of the Districts as of June 30,1996 and 1995,and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the combined financial statements of the D6tricts taken as a whole. The combining financial statements listed in the accompanying table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the combined financial statements of the Districts. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the combined financial statements and,in our opinion,is fairly presented in all material respects, in relation to the combined financial statements taken as a whole. The statistical information listed in the table of contents was not audited by us,and accordingly,we do not express an opinion thereon. ll u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK( I ' L u u u u u u u u u ll U u 2 u Yi r ae -- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS r r r r r r r b r 3 r L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Balance Sheets June 30, 1996 and 1995 u 1996 1M L Current assets: ' Cash and cash equivalents(note 2) $ 21,629,616 $ 149.586.827 u Investments(note 2) 160,125,730 Cash and investments held with fiscal agents(note 2) 8,878,988 5.976.593 Receivables: Accounts,net of allowances for uncollectables 4,984,403 11282,649 I Accrued interest 2.635,789 2:650,130 V Due from other governmental agencies 3,130,657 6,291,726 Total receivables 10,750,849 20.224.505 Inventories 3,960,259 4,731.259 Prepaid and other assets 134,304 1,560,576 Total current assets 205,479,746 182,089,760 'y Restricted assets: Cash and cash equivalents(notes 2 and 4) 62.795.706 193,846,099 l Investments(note 2) 151.232,919 19,493,434 r Receivables: Accrued interest 2.815.512 3,446,147 Connection fees 288,252 529,659 Due from other governmental agencies 2,106,074 3,003.559 64 Other 45.225 61.250 Total restricted assets 209,283.688 220,380,148 Due from other governmental agencies, LI noncurrent(note 11) 88.340.640 96.281.062 Deferred charges 2271,115 2.379.830 Property, plant and equipment,at cost(notes 3 and 8): V Land 7,121,673 7,121,672 Sewage collection facilities 307.799.843 297.097448 Sewage treatment facilities 482.107.095 482,938:632 L Sewage disposal facilities 80.031,892 80,149,899 General plant and administrative facilities 83,999,271 84.126,341 Construction in progress 115,442.484 95AX383 Total property,plant and equipment 1,076,502,258 1.046,868,285 V Less accumulated depreciation 310,169,802 282,776,401 Net property,plant and equipment 766,332,456 764,091.884 Excess purchase price over book value on acquired assets(notes 5 and 8) 13,401.910 14,059.519 i Other assets.at cost,less accumulated amortization 3,292,729 3,546,023 1� Total assets $t?68402.284 $1�R21 1 (Continued) 1 L See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. L' 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Balance Sheets(Continued) June 30, 1996 and 1995 ri 1996 1995 Current liabilities payable from current assets: Accounts payable $ 2.668,420 $ 4,882,538 Accrued expenses 4,203,875 2,421,614 Deposits 35,247 d Total current liabilities payable from current assets 6,907,542 7,304,152 .d Current liabilities payable from restricted assets: Retentions payable 1,173,272 595,992 Interest payable 4,873,592 5.521,823 Deposits 3,161,250 2,243,656 ea Claims and judgments payable,current portion(note 4) 5,709.248 162,506 General obligation bonds payable,current portion (note 4) 15.000 15,000 Certificates of participation payable,current portion e (note 4) 10,664,999 10,165,000 Total current liabilities payable from restricted assets 25,597,361 18,703,977 Long-term liabilities: Compensated absences(note 4) 2,711,500 2,556,103 Deferred compensation payable 8,878.981 5,976,593 m Claims and judgments payable,noncurrent portion(note 4) 488,247 379,177 Arbitrage payable(note 4) 477,126 - General obligation bonds payable,noncurrent portion (note 4) 30.000 45,000 u, Certificates of participation payable,noncurrent portion(note 4) 395,901,761 406.485,803 _.. Defamed revenue 80,408 57.620 Total long-term liabilities 408,568,023 415,500,296 Total liabilities 441,072,926 441,508,425 Fund equity: �+ Contributed capital(notes 5 and 8) 214,538,288 210,329,567 Retained earnings 632,791,070 630.990.334 Total fund equity 847,329,358 841.319.901 ee Total liabilities and fund equity $1 28a 402 284 $1282 62a.39R G ,., See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. 5 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Statements of Revenues,Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings For the years ended June 30. 1996 and 1995 L 1996 1996 L Operating revenues: Servicetand ngesinspection 8 68,327,669 8 70.240,184 009 Pamlk and inspection fees 120.360 24g.889 t Total operating revenues 68.441 19 70,532,273 Y.I Operating expenses other Man depreciation and amortizaton: Salad"add benefits 5,249,802 3,537,783 Utilities 555.528 549,596 V Supplies 244,040 514.723 Contractual services 2,296.164 3.379.533 Directors'fees 93,750 117,580 Travel and meetings 5,611 6,863 L Repairs and maintenance 322,839 412.023 Joint operating fund expense allocation,net(note 6) 47,858.580 46,632,488 Other 905,039 147,189 Total operating expenses other than depreciation and �y amortization 57,551,353 55.297, B Operating income before depreciation and amortization 10.886.666 15,234,495 Id Depredation 4n conldbuted facilities 75,073 75.073 Depredation on other facilities 33.269,123 33,205,113 Amortization on other assets - 149,268 Amortization of excess purchase force over book value on 6w acquired assets(notes 5 and 8) 657.709 657,709 Operating income(loss) (23,115,239) (18,852,6681 1 Non-operafing revenues: L Pmpeny taxes 29,264,892 27,285,629 Interest 20.209.438 18,499.786 .1 Federal ant state grant revenue - 203,921 Other 3.067.789 2.173262 Total non-operating revenue 52,552.119 48,163,090 Non-operating expenses: Lj Interest 20.730.753 23.940A00 Other 7,648,173 826.218 Total non-operating expenses 28.378,926 24,767,018 j Net income 1.097,954 4.543,412 1� Add depreciation and amortization related to contrbuted equlry (notes 5 and 8) 732.782 732,782 y� Net increase in retained earnings 1,800,736 5.276.194 Retained earnings,beginning of year 630.990.334 625 714.140 L Retained earnings,end of year $63>791 n>n 6 638 999 33a L L See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. L.I 6 I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Statements of Cash Flows For the years ended June 30, 1996 and 1995 1M 1995 -- Cash flows from(used by)operating activities: d Net cash provided(used) by operations $ 66,775.477 $(61.094.308) - Cash flows from(used by)capital and related financing activities: Additions to property,plant and equipment (34,927,059) (33,478.174) Interest paid,net of amounts capitalized (21,298.027) (25.438,739) Principal payments on taxable commercial paper - (50,000,000) Principal payments on certificates of r participation (10.166,000) (9,655,000) Principal payments on bonds (15.000) (15,000) Proceeds from caphal contributions 4,525,201 23,367,021 �. Net cash provided(used)by capital and related financing activi0es (61.879.885) (95,219.092) Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from the sale of investments 1,501,438,336 104.871,526 m Purchases of Investments (1,793,303.551) - Interest received 20,854,414 20,427,971 Increase(decrease)in obligation under reverse repurchase e agreement - (91.813.000) _ Net cash provided(used)by investing activities (271,010,801) 33.486A m Net increase(decrease)in cash and cash equivalents (266,115,209) (122,827,703) Cash and cash equivalents,beginning of year 349,419,519 472,247.222 Cash and cash equivalents,end of year $_a3�Os„ 4m $349 41A 51g ,., (Continued) d See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. 7 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Statements of Cash Flows(Continued) I For the years ended June 30, 1996 and 1995 L 1996 1$9 Cash flows from operating activities: I Operating income(loss) $(23,115,239) $(18,852,668) V Adjustments to reconcile operating income(loss) to net cash provided by operations: Depreciation 33,344,196 33,280,186 L Amortization 657,709 806,977 Proceeds from property taxes 29,264,892 27,285.629 Federal and state gram revenue - 203921 Other non-operating revenues 3,087,789 2,173:762 Other non-operating expenses (7,539,458) (701,502) Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease(increase)in accounts receivable 6,298.246 (5,143,845) i Decrease(increase)in due from other d districts - 8,948,250 Decrease(increase)in due from other governmental agencies 11.998,976 (97,706280) Decrease(increase)in other receivables 16.025 3.213:389 Decrease(increase)in inventories 771,000 (214,943) Decrease (increase)in prepaid and other assets 1,426,272 (1,040,295) Decrease(increase)in other assets,net of r amortization 253,294 (912,842) Increase(decrease)in accounts payable (2,214,118) 629,791 Increase(decrease)in accrued expenses 2.259,387 (2,867,926) Increase(decrease)in retentions payable 577.280 (657,D86) L Increase(decrease)in deposits 917.594 (278.733) Increase(decrease)in due to other districts - (8,954,781) I Increase(decrease)in other liabilities 36.247 - 61 Increase(decrease)in compensated absences 155,397 (502.205) Increase(decrease)in deferred compensation payable 2,902,388 62,379 Increase(decrease)in claims and judgments L payable 5,655,812 167,283 Increase(decrease)in deferred revenue 22,784 (22,789) Net cash provided by(used by)operations $Bfi Tl6477 $r61 09A306) V 1d t� y V See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. L 8 1 .� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Reporting Entity The financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(Districts) include the operations of nine separate Districts operating within the County of Orange, California. The Districts jointly own and operate certain sewage treatment and disposal facilities for the benefit of residents of Orange County, California. The Districts are managed by a joint administrative organization composed of directors appointed by the Districts. Each individual District is governed by a board consisting of the mayor, or a designee,of each of the cities, or a representative from the local sewering district within the District and a member of the Board of Supervisors. The Districts utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, which costs are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow. The Districts'balance sheets reflect the allocated balance sheet accounts of the joint operating, working capital and capital outlay funds. The Districts are independent of and overlap many formal political jurisdictions. There are many governmental entities, including the County of Orange, that operate within the Districts' jurisdictions; however, financial information for these entities is not included in the accompanying financial statements based on the following provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 14: . Each entity has an independent elected governing body. . Each entity is solely responsible for its daily operations. . The Districts are neither entitled to operating surpluses nor responsible for operating deficits of any of the entities. . Each entity is exclusively responsible for administration of its own fiscal affairs. Basis of Accounting Each of the Districts operates as an enterprise activity. Enterprise funds account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises,where the intent of the Board of Directors is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing services to the general public on a confining basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenses are recognized in the accounts and ,.r reported in the financial statements. All enterprise funds are accounted for on the flow of economic resources measurement focus and use the accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they are earned, and their expenses are recognized when they are incurred. Unbilled sewer service receivables are recorded at year end. The Districts apply all GASB pronouncements currently in effect as well as Financial Accounting Standards Board Statements and Interpretafions, Accounting Principal Board Opinions and e, Accounting Research Bulletins of the Committee on Accounting Procedure issued on or before November 30, 1989. (Continued) 9 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 L Operating Plans i Each year, Districts' staff prepare annual operating plans for each District. These annual operating plans, as adopted by the respective Boards of Directors, are used to serve as a basis for monitoring financial progress, estimating the levy and collection of taxes and determining future service charge rates. During the year, these plans may be amended as circumstances or levels of L operations dictate. Cash Equivalents Investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents. U Investments Investments are stated at cost except for assets of the defamed compensation plan which are J carried at market value. When market values decline below cost, no loss is recorded if such declines are considered temporary. The Districts' policy is to hold investments until maturity, or unfit market values equal or exceed cost. L Invento y Inventory is stated at the lower cost or market on a first-in, or first-out basis. j Property. Plant and Equipment �I Outlays for property, plant, equipment and construction in progress are recorded in the respective Districts. Such outlays may be for either individual District assets or their respective share of joint 140 assets. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, except for assets acquired by contribution, L which are recorded at fair market value at the time received. Cost includes labor, materials; outside services; vehicle and equipment usage; allocated indirect charges such as engineering, purchasing, supervision and other fringe benefits; and certain administrative and general II expenses. Net interest costs are capitalized on projects during the construction period. N Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets using the straight-line method. The Districts generally follow the guidelines of estimated useful lives as recommended in the State of California Controllers Uniform System of Id Acwunts for Waste Disposal Districts, which range from 3 to 75 years. Depreciation expense related to contributed plant and equipment is charged to contributed facilities. li Amortization W Amortization of other assets and excess purchase price over book value of joint assets acquired is If'f provided using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 5 and 30 years, respectively. Yi Discounts on the certificates of participation are amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the installment obligations based on their effective interest rates (note 4). When L certificates of participation have been refunded in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance, the related portion of the discount, acquisition costs and deferred gain or loss on terminated interest rate swaps are written off at the date of the refunding and classified as an extraordinary item in the accompanying combined statement of revenues, expenses, antl changes L in retained earnings(note 4). V (Continued) ,D I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 Restricted Assets s, Certain assets are restricted to comply with debt service and capital project requirements. Specifically, the assets are restricted for the purposes of installment payments due on certificates of participation,joint treatment works expansion and capital expenditures for improvements. Interest Rate Swaps The Districts enter into interest rate swap transactions in connection with the issuance of ,r certificates of participation as part of their overall financing program. These interest rate swaps are accounted for as hedges, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the terms of the swap agreement. Gains or losses on terminated interest rate swaps are defamed and amortized to interest expense over the remaining terms of the swap agreements, although the amortization may be accelerated in the case of a refunding of the related certificates of participation in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance(see discussion in Amortization above). ® Compensated Absences The Districts' employees, other than operations and maintenance personnel, are granted vacation and sick leave in varying amounts with maximum accumulations of 200 hours and 560 hours for vacation and sick days earned but unused, respectively. Operations and maintenance personnel accrue"Personal Leave"at a rate of between 60 and 200 hours per year depending on years of service. Personal leave can be accumulated up to a maximum of 400 hours. ,< Vacation and sick leave benefits and personal days are recorded when earned in the accompanying Districts' financial statements under the caption "Compensated absences." In determining the estimated sick leave liability at June 30 of each year, the Districts assume that all employee accumulated sick leave balances will ultimately be paid out. .. Claims and Judgments The Districts records estimate losses, net of any insurance coverage under its self-insurance program (see Self-Insurance Plans below) when it is probable that a claim liability has been incurred, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Claims payable, which includes an estimate for"incurred but unreported claims", is recorded in each of the Districts'funds. m Property Taxes Property taxes attach an enforceable lien on property as of March 1. Taxes are levied on July 1 and are payable in two installments which become delinquent after December 10 and April 10. The County bills and collects the property taxes and remits them to the Districts in installments during the year. Districts' property tax revenues are recognized when levied to the extent that they are available to finance current operations. The County is permitted by State law (Proposition 13) to levy taxes at 1% of full market value (at time of purchase) and can increase the assessed value no more than two percent per year. The Districts receive a share of this basic levy proportionate to what was received in the 1976 to 1978 period. (Continued) 11 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 L Joint Operations The Districts are co-participants in an agreement dated March 10, 1971, as amended July 1, 1985, V which provides for the joint construction, ownership and operation of certain treatment and disposal property, plant, equipment and other assets. Under the agreement, the respective District equity percentages in jointly owned assets are based on gallons of sewage flow. Equity percentages are L determined at the end of each fiscal year and prevail for the ensuing year. Construction costs of jointly owned assets are allocated to the various individual Districts. Joint operating expenses are allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow during the year. L Payroll, related benefits and certain overhead items are allocated to the individual Districts based primarily on direct labor hours. Deferred Compensation Plan ' Ld The Districts offers its employees a deferred compensation plan established in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan permits all employees of the Districts to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The amount deferred is not available to employees until termination, retirement,death or for unforseeable emergency. I" All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts and all income attributable to those amounts, property or rights are (until paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the Districts (without being restricted to the provisions of benefits under the plan), subject only to the claims of the Districts' general creditors of the Districts in an amount equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each participant. For the Districts' General Manager and Assistant General V Managers, the Districts have agreed to contribute $7,500 annually towards their deferred compensation plans. For Department Heads, the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 3%of their gross annual salaries, provided the employees voluntarily contribute an equal or greater sum. In addition, the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 3%of gross annual salaries, which does not require matching contributions by the employee. For Assistant Department Heads, the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 2% of their gross annual salaries, provided the employees voluntarily contribute an equal or greater sum. In addition, the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 2-112% of gross annual salaries, which does not require matching contributions by the employee. For Managers, Supervisors, and Professionals, the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 1%of their gross annual salaries, provided the employees voluntarily contribute an equal or greater LJ sum. In addition, the Districts have agreed to contrbute an amount not to exceed 2% of gross annual salaries, which does not require matching contributions by the employee. Earnings generated by the plan are nontaxable to the employees until received, which occurs after V refirement, termination, or District action approving withdrawal. Funds are invested for the participants, with earnings thereon accruing to the benefit of each participant in proportion to his or her investment The Districts have no liability for losses under the plan but do have the duty of due Li care that would be required of an ordinary prudent investor. The Districts believe that it is unlikely that they will use the assets to satisfy claims of general creditors in the future. Assets of the plan, stated at market value, totaled $8,878,988 and $5,976,593 at June 30, 1996 and 1995, L respectively. Self-Insurance Plans 6W For the year ended June 30, 1996, the Districts were self-insured for workers' compensation, property damage and general liability. The self-insurance portion of workers' compensation is (Continued) 12 L s, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 r $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to the statutory limit. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $200 million for flood, fire and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquakes is $250,000 or 5% per unit of - insurance, whichever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to$30 million. The Districts also maintain outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a$100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000, The Districts are completely self-insured for general liability coverage. As of February 1, 1995, the Districts obtained outside insurance coverage for group medical claims and are no longer self-insured. Claims against the Districts are processed by outside insurance administrators. These claims are .= charged to claims expense based on amounts which will ultimately be paid. Claims incurred but not yet reported have been considered in determining the accrual for loss contingencies. Insurance expense is allocated to the individual Districts based on wastewater flow. Districts' management believes that there are no unrecorded claims as of June 30, 1996 that would materially affect the financial position of the Districts. Contributed Equity Connection fees represent fees received from developers and residents to join new or extend existing trunk sewer systems in excess of the cost to connect. Capital replacement charges represent fees charged to certain special districts and agencies for their proportionate share of fixed asset expenditures. Connection fees and capital replacement charges are recorded as contributed equity. .e (2) Cash and Investments The Districts follows the practice of pooling cash and investments of all funds except for cash held by fiscal agents, and amounts in the deferred compensation plan. Interest income earned on pooled cash and investments is allocated quarterly to the various funds ,a based on month-end cash and investment balances. Interest income from cash and investments of funds excluded from pooled cash is credited directly to the related fund. Deposits Deposits in banks are maintained in financial institutions which provide deposit protection on the bank balance from the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation. The California Government ., Code requires California banks and savings and loans to secure local government deposits by pledging government securities equal to 110% of the deposits or by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes equal to 150%of the deposits. w (Continued) 13 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 i Deposits are categorized herein, in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 3, to give an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the Districts at year-end. 6 Category 1- Insured or collateralized with securities held by the Districts or by its agent in the Districts'name. I Category 2- Collateralized with securities held by the financial institution's trust department or u agent in the Districts' name. I I Category 3- Uncollaterelized or collateralized, but the pledged securities are not held in the L� Districts'name. Restricted investments, as classified on the balance sheet, are in reserve funds held by Texas Commerce Bank and State Street Bank as specified in the trust agreements (note 4). At June 30, V 1996 and 1995, these investments were limited to deposits within bank investment contracts (BIC). Although the BIC with State Street Bank is classified as Category 3, as shown below, the depositor, AIG Matched Funding Corporation, is required to pledge collateral in an amount equal to 103% of the amount of the investment contract if the long-term unsecured, unsubordinated debt securities LI of AIG falls below a S&P rating of`AA-"or below a Moody's rating of`Aa3". Investments L Statutes authorize the Districts to invest in obligations of the U.S. Government; state and local governmental agencies; negotiable certificates of deposits; bankers acceptance; commercial I paper, reverse repurchase agreements; and a variety of other investment instruments which are L allowable per the California Government Code. Investments are categorized herein, in accordance with GASB Statement No. 3, to give an indication of the level of credit risk assumed by the Districts at year-end. L Category 1- Insured or registered, or securities held by the Districts or their agent in the Districts' name. Category 2- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial institutions'trust department or agent in the Districts' name. , Category 3- Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the purchasing financial y institutions'trust department or agent but not in the Districts' name. The Districts invest in overnight repurchase agreements in order to maximize the yield on funds on j deposit as a result of outstanding warrants. At June 30, 1996, the Districts total demand cash bank balance amounted to$5,857,491, of which $1,015,000 was invested in ovemight repurchase agreements and$4.842.491 was the cash balance on hand with the bank. j Investments Not Subject to Cateeorization L Investments in the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the Orange County Investment Pool (OCIP) are not categorized, as GASB Statement No. 3 does not require 1 categorization of investment pools managed by another government. Funds on deposit within the L Districts' Defamed Compensation Plan and cash and investments held by fiscal agents are not categorized because the underlying assets of the funds are invested within open-ended mutual funds. Decisions regarding these investments are made by fiscal agents for the Districts who are L acting in accordance with agreements entered into with the Districts. All such investments are not required to be categorized under interpretive guidelines issued by GASB. (Continued) L' 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 At June 30, 1996, market value of LAW was$26,982,550,842, and the carrying amount of the pool was $26,781,148,920. The Districts' proportionate share of that value is $14,315.905. Included in LAIF's investment portfolio are certain derivative securities or similar products in the form of structured notes, totaling $1,100,720,000 and asset backed securities totaling $313,945,000. LAW's, and the Districts'exposure to credit, market, or legal risk is not available. d At June 30, 1996, market value of OCIP was$1,649,744,603, and the carrying amount of the pool was $1,645,099,838. The Districts' proportionate share of that value is $477,546. Included in OCIP's investment portfolio are asset backed securities, totaling $5.967,150. OCIP's, and the Districts'exposure to credit, market, or legal risk is not available. A summary of deposits and investments were categorized as follows: June 30, 1995 .e Caning Amount Bank Deposits: Unrestricted Restricted Balance Caueao Demand cash accounts $ 2,718,207 1,796,105 4,842,491 2 Bank Investment Contracts- -with Texas Commerce Bank - 4,482,934 4.492.934 3 -with State Street Bank 14,624,000 14.624,00D 3 Total Deposits 2,718,207 20,903,039 S a9 a4u 4g5 r Market or Contractual Investments: Value Repurchase agreement 3,188,540 3,011.460 7.215.000 3 Cash and investments with LAIF 7,307,439 6,901,610 14,209,049 WA Cash and investments with OCIP 429,265 46,947 476,202 WA U.S. Government Securities 132,076,714 124,740,701 254,051.756 1 Commercial Paper 13,497,935 12,748,300 26,093,015 1 Corporate Bonds 22,286,508 21,048,800 43,369,384 1 Cash and investments held with fiscal agents 251,748 14,627,768 14.879,516 WA Deferred compensation 8-878.988 8.878.988 N/A Total Investments 187,916,127 183,125,586 369.17�291 r Total Carrying Amount $1906n4nne v0a o2e ass Cash and cash equivalents and investments as reported on the combined balance sheet: Cash and cash equivalents $21,629,616 52,795.706 Cash and investments held with fiscal agents 8,878,988 - _ Investments 160,125.730 151.232.919 $190 634. 204 09a,6]7y (Continued) 15 IL L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 W Summary of deposits and investments (continued): June 30, 1995 U Camino Amount Bank Deposits: Unrestricted Restricted Balance Category Demand cash accounts $ 183,902 244,408 149,027 1 L Bank Investment Contracts- -with Texas Commerce Bank - 4,482,934 4,482,934 3 -with State Street Bank 15,010,500 15,010,500 3 Total Deposits 183,902 19,737.842 19 fia2 4fi1 to Market or Contractual Investments: _ Value Repurchase agreement - - 820,000 3 Cash and investments wkh LAIF 11.197,861 13,698,810 24,896,671 WA Cash and investments with OCIP 412.190 9,236 421,426 N/A U.S.Treasury Bills 137,802.871 168,579,989 306,714,408 3 Cash and investments held with fiscal agents - 11.313,656 11,313,656 WA Deferred compensation 5,976,596 - 5,976,596 NIA Li Total Investments 155,389518 193,601,691 350.142757 Ii Total Carrying Amount $155 573 420 21 a ug 594 V Cash and cash equivalents and investments as reported on the combined balance sheet: L Cash and cash equivalents $ 149,596,827 193,846,099 Cash and investments held with fiscal agents 5,976,593 Investments 19,493.434 L $1 557340 213311M L The Districts invest in overnight repurchase agreements in order to maximize the yield on funds on deposit as a result of outstanding warrants. At June 30, 1995,the Districts total demand cash accounts of$428,310 are reflected L by demand cash balances of$149,027 and repurchase agreement bank balances of$820,000. L L L (Continued) 16 L e„ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 19%and 1995 r (3) Property. Plant. Eauioment and Construction In Proaress r Respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress,at cost, at June 30, 1996 and 1995 follows: Property. Plant and Eauioment 1996 1995 District Jointly Separately No. Owned owned Total Total r 1 $ 66,968,919 7,054,161 74,023,080 72,538,883 2 194,122,587 97,661,184 291.783,771 293,480,215 3 200,441,401 63,902,520 264,343,921 265,621,999 5 25,404,142 34,296,917 59,701,059 58,694,941 6 29,394,543 5,276,748 34,671,291 35,563,723 7 59,853,166 40,096,116 99,949,281 93,633,414 11 45,288,853 19,229,323 64,518,176 81,331,505 13 6,849,836 2,751,557 9,601,393 9,012,216 14 36,878,956 26,588,646 62,467,802 61,657,196 665.202,403 295,857,371 961,059.774 951.433,892 Construction in Progress 1996 1995 District Jointly Separately No- Owned Owned Total Total 1 $ 10,683,822 72 10,683,894 8.814,734 2 28,815,167 450.549 29.265,716 23,942,989 3 28,731,325 8,133,410 36,864,735 27.634.686 5 4,073,138 679,138 4,752,276 3.379,747 6 3,853,464 2,500,119 6,353,583 4.577.258 7 7,592,006 3,303,834 10,895,840 8,711,717 11 5,711,666 6,091,781 11,803,447 8,638,880 13 740,966 - 740,966 501.977 r 14 3,960,979 121,048 4,082,027 9,232,405 94,162,533 21,279,951 115,442,484 95,434,393 ti Total property, plant and equipment $?5o_36e.936 317.137322 107650 2 8 1,046,868.285 r (Continued) 17 ICI L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 (4) Long-Term Debt The following is a summary of the changes in long-term debt for the year ended June 30, 1996: L Balance Balance July 1, June 30, 1995 Additions Deletions 1996 Arbitrage payable $ - 477,126 - 477,126 Compensated absences 2,556,103 155,397 2,711,500 L Claims and judgments payable 541,683 5,655,812 - 6,197,495 General obligation bonds 60,000 15,000 45,000 y Certificates of participation 418,375.000 10,165,000 408,210.000 Totals $ 421_532786 6288.336 t0.180.00o a17641-121 L Arbitrage Pavable v The Tax Reform Act of 1986 ('the Act") substantially revised the treatment to be afforded to the earnings on the proceeds of tax exempt debt, and now requires the Districts to calculate and remit rebatable arbitrage earnings to the Internal Revenue Service. Certain of the Districts' debt and interest earnings L on the proceeds thereof are subject to the requirements of the Act. The Districts have accrued a liability for the estimated rebatable arbitrage earnings. E4T7.1ffi Compensated Absences The Districts' policies related to compensated absences are described in Note 1. This liability will be paid in future years from future resources: $2 711.500 W Claims and Judgments Payable The Districts are self-insured in a number of areas as described in Note 1: V Claims and Judgments payable at June 30, 1995 $ 541,683 Claims incurred during the June 30, 1996 fiscal year 6,564,846 Payments on claims during the June 30, 1996 fiscal year (909,034) U Claims and Judgments payable at June 30, 1996 6,197,495 Less current portion: - 5,709,248 I Total long-term $�47 {r General Obligation Bonds 1958 District No. 11 General Obligation Bonds with interest at 1% payable in annual installments of$15,000 to maturity in January 1999: $45.000 Less current portion: 15 000 LI Total long-term (Contintlnuetl) 18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 Certificates of Participation The Districts issue certificates of participation in order to finance their respective share of the construction scheduled at the jointly owned treatment facilities. Each certificate of participation represents a direct and proportionate interest in the semiannual interest payments. Each district is responsible for its own installment payment and is not obligated for any other Districts' payments. Installment payments for the issues are payable from any source of lawfully available ,r funds of the Districts. All of the Districts'certificates of participation are 25-year issuances except for the 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation which is a 23-year issuance. Certificates of participation at June 30, 1996 are summarized as follows: 1990-1992 Series A Certificates of Participation $ 92,400,000 1990-1992 Series B Certificates of Participation 30,170,000 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation 94,000,000 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation 146,240,000 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation 45A00.000 Total certificates of participation 408,210,000 Less: current portion 10,664,999 unamortized discount 1,643,240 Total long-term $395.901.761 1986 Certificates of Participation On August 13, 1986, Districts Numbers 1, 2 and 3 completed the sale of $117,000,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments were due February 1 and August 1, beginning February 1, 1987, Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1988. On December 1992, the entire remaining principal balance of the certificates was refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below) in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. 1990-1992 Series A Certificates of Participation On December 5, 1990, all Districts completed the sale of $100,000,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly beginning January 1991. The interest rate on the d, certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996 was 3.4%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1991. All principal and interest payments are to be secured by nine separate irrevocable letters of credit issued by National Westminster Bank. The letters of credit will expire on December 15, 2000, unless earlier terminated. The Districts have the option of prepaying certificates in whole or in part ,., at an amount equal to the principal plus accrued interest, if any, without premium. (Continued) 19 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 L 1990-1992 Series B Certificates of Participation On May 1, 1991, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$117,555,000 of .. certificates of participation. Interest payments are due February 1 and August 1 of each year. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996 was 6.17%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1992. The certificates were issued with an original issue discount of$3,731,496. The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to$7,369,539, which was funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by Texas Commerce Bank, the trustee (note 2). In addition, Federal Guaranty Insurance Company provides municipal bond insurance for the certificates. In December 1992, $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was 6. refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below) in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. On September 1, 1993, $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was Ir refunded from the proceeds of the September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. L. 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation On September 1, 1992, Districts Numbers 1, 2,3,6,7 and 11 completed the sale of$96,500,000 of V certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly, beginning October 7, 1992. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996 was 3.5%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to$9,850,000, which was funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by State Street Bank, the trustee(note 2). ., December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation On December 3, 1992, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of $160,600,000 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. r On October 1, 1992, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 5.55% and receive a variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of$160,600,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the tern of the swap agreement The 2D- year swap agreement matures on August 1,2013. W L 20 L d COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 m The certificates were issued to refund the remaining outstanding principal balance of the 1986 certificates of participation and $38,350.000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts' combined financial m statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30, 1996 was $136,650,000. September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation On September 2, 1993, Districts Numbers 1,2, 3, 5,6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of$46,000,000 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1995. On September 1, 1993, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 4.56% and receive a variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of $46,000,000. This interest rate swap agreement is s, accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. The 22-year swap agreement matures on August 1, 2016. ®' The certificates were issued to refund $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly,the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts' combined financial statements. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30, 1996 was approximately$39,740,000. Annual Amortization Requirements The annual requirements to amortize all Districts' debt other than arbitrage payable, compensated absences and claims and judgments payable as of June 30, 1996, including interest payments of $290,966,326, are as follows: General Certificates ,y Obligation Bonds of Participation Year ending June 30: 1997 $ 15,450 34,500,054 1998 15,300 34,492,420 1999 15,150 34,597,510 2000 - 34,627,746 2001 - 34,738,246 ,r Thereafter 526,219,450 $ 45.900 699.1M _ ds m (Continued) 21 d L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 L (5) Contributed Eau! The following is a summary of the changes in contributed capital for the year ended June 30, 1996 and 1995, respectively: Capital Cci'r M.l Dtalons satlon ham of Irene us Connection Capita rcc Oepekon RBRU PurtJs Fees RepMm On Dis a Price Over B,N 1.i al M,,a9 meet CFavidomb etl Dis8icl Binoto at trie"eal (Farenaep) Sjl g®By FetilNes (* �py� Jame 30.1888 DIaMd No 5 B,W.W 04.654 (680.818) - - - 4.911.403 Dls d No.2 42.707.406 4,213.677 (1,W8.113) - - - 45,0]3,031) .y DIsMd Np.3 27A80,838 2.32BA41 (2,155,113) - - - 20014,00] 0"d No.5 12,B08,BB SB5.3 =8.601 (242.359) - - - 12, 205 DiaMd No.6 5,157,535 44.062 (350.884) - - 4,850,B33 DIa9Id No.] 15.057,09 1,945.203 (512.560) (75,0]3) - - 17.314.02 DisOid No.11 12ABD,200 408.335 (413.523) - - - 12,255,012 r Matnot No.13 G.M.I a 250A50 (03.558) - 6.028705 Dlspid No.14 51.147,79E f450691) 27A6189 (077M 112,305,561 Total 5J1n ff0'a+ AAR= 18a1]]5p1 $LM 21R819R (65]]aRl 41d cy]RR t✓ Gpitel MW3 uWn of Dutlona 2a Bmn Irvine Eunes W Connection CepRN Oeprnieean RanU Pul a Fees Rap102 on wal9r Papa Ov.r Uamo Eem96 nkM CFaoliketi DUMB Book Value nelant 19 ,l65C]._LB_4 IE4meaeE) IibB� FadlNn Imte 81 Im1e 81 June 30.1205 r Da01d No,2 $ 6.470.531 35.846 ]46,036 - - - 2.707.40 5.557.027 DISMd No.3 66,OD,531 3.662.852 2.383.710 - - - 42,]8)A38 DLRMd No.5 24MB.147 1,250.BB2 2,285,]10 - - - 27.880.839 DINrld No.6 12.751.M (228.015) RT,02B - 851.425 - 5.158,803 7.05 DisMd No.7 4.r51 AT1 58.015 51114M - - 5,W.052 (ssl District No.T 14,660,216 1,060.4Q 501.402 p5,Br5) - - 16,5$050 D=O No,11 11,666.T46 132,860 d60,T83 - - - 12,280.200 Di310d No.13 8,103.64 421.100 90,529 - 1147793 OiaMd No.10 ]43n 143 � 480 N2 6W2R16 (es1 T661 �,]�jj@g I r Total SIBR RR]RlR 9M= ]]11 R1] 9A= ]]R4 L1 I65]]IIR1 212.129.W (6) Joint Operating Fund Expense Allocation The Districts utilize joint operating,working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, which are subsequently allocated to the Districts based on gallons of sewage flow. A summary of joint operating costs follows: .L (ContinueM 22 L ,y COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 1996 1995 Revenue: Service charges $ 3,034,444 $2,617,227 Other 1,155,620 2,032.288 Total revenue 4190 4,649.515 Expenses: Salaries and benefits 27,410,392 25,861,439 Supplies 5,295.031 4,862,123 Contractual 8,034,206 8,624,455 Repairs and maintenance 3,276.772 3,407,073 Utilities 2,392.165 2,630,013 Other 5,640,078 5,896,900 Total expenses 52,048,644 51,282,003 Netjoint operating expenses $47.958 58 $46.6 f71 Pension Plan The Districts participate in the Orange County Employee's Retirement System ("OCERS"), a cost-sharing multiple-employer, defined benefit pension plan. OCERS was established in 1945 under the provisions of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, and provides members with retirement, death, disability, and cost-of-living benefits. The payroll of employees covered by OCERS was $27,473,413 for the year ended June 30, 1996 and $26,474,828 for the year ended June 30,1995; the Districts'total payroll was$29,534,540 in 1996 and$28,560,787 in 1995. Benefits All District full-time employees participate in OCERS. Employees who retire at or after age 50 with ten or more years of service are entitled to an annual retirement allowance. The amount of the retirement allowance is based upon the member's age at retirement, the members "final compen- `° sation"as defined in Section 31462 of the Retirement Law of 1937, the total years of service under OCERS, and the employees' classification as a Tier I or Tier II member. Benefits fully vest on reaching five years of service. OCERS also provides death and disability benefits. Contributions Tier I and Tier II covered employees are required to contribute 4.89%- 7.51% and 6.66%-10.23%, respectively, of their annual compensation to OCERS. The Districts are required to make periodic contributions to OCERS in amounts that are estimated to remain a constant percentage of covered employees' compensation such that, when combined with covered employees' contributions, will r, fully provide for all covered employees' benefits by the time they retire. The contribution requirement for the years ended June 30, 1996 and 1995 were $3,663,022 and $3,006,892, respectively, which consisted of $2,682,558 from the Districts and $880,464 from employees in 1996 and $2,189,501 from the Districts and $816,391 from employees In 1995. The Districts' contributions represented 9.8% and 8.3% of covered payroll and employee contributions represented 3.2% and 3.1% for the years ended June 30, 1996 and 1995, respectively. (Continued) 23 d L I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �+ Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 i V The Districts' contributions for the years ended June 30, 1996 and 1995 represented 3.9% and 2.2%of total contributions required of all participating enfties, respectively. Pension Benefit Obligation The amount shown below as the"pension benefit obligation" is a standardized disclosure measure of the present value of pension benefits, adjusted for the effects of projected salary increases and step-rate benefits estimated to be payable in the future as a result of employee service to date. The measure,which is the actuarial present value of credited projected benefits, is intended to help users assess OCERS' funding status on a going-concern basis, assess progress made in accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due, and make comparisons among other public employees retirement systems. OCERS does not make separate measurements of assets and pension benefit obligations for individual employers. The pension benefit obligation at December 31, 1996 for OCERS as a whole, determined through an actuarial valuation performed ` as of that date, is as follows: December 31, 1995 1994 `+ (in thousands) Pension benefit obligation: Retirees and beneficiaries y currently receiving benefits and terminated employees not yet receiving benefits $ 1,201.057 1,002,300 Active participants: V Provided by employee contributions including allocated investment income 438,949 413,058 Provided by employer contributions: Vested benefits 368,020 382,325 Nonvested benefits 430.865 416,478 Total pension benefit V obligation 2,438,891 2,214,161 Net assets available for benefits, at market value 3,026,490 2,498.489 V Overfunded pension benefit obligation $ 1587.5991 ) Actuarial Assumptions �r In 1992, several actuarial assumptions and methods changed. The mortality assumption was changed from the 1971 GAM Male Mortality to the 1983 GAM Male and Female Mortality. The assumed rates of withdrawal were reduced 15%. The unallocated fund balance was decreased to 5% of fund assets with the decrease split 75% to County Advance Reserves and 25% to the Additional Retiree Benefit Account. The Board of Retirement elected to phase in these changes in assumptions over three years, beginning December 31, 1992. Under the new funding method, the expected effect on the employer contribution rate is an increase in the contribution as employees reach retirement age. Significant actuarial assumptions used in the valuation include a rate of return of 80/6 and projected salary increases of 3.5%per annum per individual. (Continued) 24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 .e Historical Trend Information Ten-year historical trend information showing the OCERS' progress in accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due is presented in the OCERS' December 31, 1995 annual financial report. (8)Transactions with Irvine Ranch Water District District No. 14 The Districts formed Sanitation District No. 14 as a result of a negotiated Agreement between the Districts and Irvine Ranch Water District("IRWD') as of July 1, 1985. Pursuant to the Agreement, IRWD paid the Districts $34,532,000 for an initial 15,000,000 gallons per day capacity in the d Districts' joint treatment facilities (with an ultimate collection capacity of 32,000,000 gallons per day), together with a pro-rate interest in real property based on flow of 32,000,000 gallons per day. The book value of the assets purchased by IRWD was determined to be $14,553,000 as of June 30, 1986. The excess of the purchase price over the assets' book value of$19,979,000 at June 30, 1986 is being amortized over the remaining 30-year useful lives of the joint assets of District No. 14. As of June 30, 1996, $6,577,090 of the excess of purchase price over the assets' book value was amortized. IRWD entered into a separate agreement with District No. 14 whereby IRWD agreed to annually fund payment of District No. 14's proportionate share of the District's joint capital outlay revolving fund budget requirements and certain capital improvements during the term of the agreement, which contribution amounted to $2,266,189 in 1996 and $6.942,916 in 1995 (see note 5). The contributions are included as contributed equity in the accompanying combined balance sheet. ,., District No. 5 IRWD also entered into an agreement with District No. 5 to provide funding to District No. 5 for the construction costs of certain wastewater collection, transmission,treatment and disposal facilities to " be used by IRWD (the "Downwast Agreement'). No new funding occurred in 1996, however, funding amounted to $851,425 in 1995 and is included as contributed equity in the accompanying combined balance sheet. The agreement also provided that IRWD would not be required to pay connection fees related to development in the Downcoast Area (as defined in the Downcoast Agreement). d (Continued) 25 i Lr COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 I V (9)Segment Information 1 The Districts consist of nine individual Districts that provide sewerage services and are financed primarily through user charges. Key financial data of the individual Districts, in thousands of dollars,are as follows for the years ended June 30, 1996 and 1995: r 19� Property Tax Operating Dept.8 Amon. Operating Net Net Ina.To F.nd Rtnienues R vn�nues Exnanse Inc. Los Inc. Los Contrib.Coots) r District No.1 S 1,972 6.690 2,819 (1,642) (2,D60) (646) District No.2 8,927 21,449 9.937 (6,307) (877) 2.306 District No.3 9.991 22,627 9,533 (3,600) 4,689 133 District No.5 2,407 2,736 1.770 (1,502) 918 (14) r District No.6 1.117 3.529 1,389 (86) 1.011 (307) District No.7 2.896 7,348 3,29D (2,186) 1,031 1,358 District No.11 1,975 3258 2.110 (3,356) (1255) (5) District No.13 - W7 260 (8) 476 226 r District No.14 4 2.895 14,428) f2.865) 1.158 Total 9239M 6fi tl 34= (J311 S1LOW 4= W4 Fount Asset Total Net Working COPS 8 Bonds Total AdditionsAssets Capital le"able EcuiN r District No.1 8 3,372 89,121 9,450 50,757 35,004 District No.2 5.815 380.011 52,961 133.806 236.647 District No.3 10.355 370,282 73.638 126,374 234,282 District No.5 2,274 84,078 13,641 23,054 69.660 r District No.6 1,801 56.062 14,186 17.163 37,568 District No.7 7,759 126,692 16A87 27.855 95,343 District No. 11 5.621 86.693 9,526 25.441 58.645 District No.13 727 19,611 1.609 313 19,034 r District No. 14 (2,7971 75,833 7,075 1 939 71,146 Total 3=auu 1 tax m+ 1pa c73 9 6. IM Property Tax Operating Dept.8 AmorL Operating Net Net Ina.To 6,1 Fund Rev nues Revenues Expense Inc.(Loss) Inc(Loss) Contrib.Capital District No. 1 31,768 6,591 2,835 (2,036) (1,5D5) 782 District No.2 0250 23.779 10.053 (4,549) 1,017 6,297 District No.3 9,366 23,297 9,835 (2,395) 5.083 3,653 District No.5 2,286 2.730 1,758 (1,493) 461 860 District No.6 978 3,732 1,457 253 1,106 406 District No.7 2,763 6,190 3,D03 (1,768) 1,681 1,567 L.I District No.11 1,873 3,320 2.045 (2.728) (1,489) 593 District No.13 - 845 252 387 736 498 District No.14 48 2,839 �,54 2331 I3,`d9¢2 6.77 Total tTi I2Bg ➢�93 708 J1�B ¢ 21= {el L (Continued) 26 i Y.I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements June 30, 1996 and 1995 Filed Asset Total Net Wonting COPS B Bonds Total Additions n Aasels Capital Payable E ultr District No.t s 1.966 92,223 10.922 52.025 37710 District No.2 6,300 379,870 46,798 137,244 235,218 ve District No.3 5,153 366,173 61.417 129.420 229,460 District No.5 129 $3.499 13.250 23.723 58.755 District No.6 1,928 55,348 10.817 17,544 36,864 District No.7 7.940 123,943 16,258 28.561 92,878 m District No.11 4.116 87,554 11,531 25.998 59,906 District No.13 549 18,824 1.525 319 18,331 Denial No.14 5,396 75,394 2.268 1876 72196 er Total 93�47 1B B2 PB 1Z4.zm 41B 1 841 1 (10)Other Required Individual Fund Disclosures District 14 has accumulated retained eamings deficits at June 30, 1996 and 1995 of$11,159,610 and $8,952,013, respectively. These deficits are expected to be eliminated by revised service charges in future years. L,Contingencies On December 6, 1994, the County of Orange (County) and the Orange County Investment Pools (collectively"Pool") filed petitions under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy code. On May 2, 1995, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Califomia, Santa Ana Division ("Bankruptcy CourC), approved the settlement entered into by and among the County, the Pool and Pool Participants. er On May 15. 1996, the County of Orange settlement(Plan of Adjustment and Joint Agreement)was approved by the Bankruptcy Court. The Settlement provided for the Districts to receive"Settlement Secured Claims" against the County. The settlement Secured Claims are secured by a first-prionty secured interest on 65% of net litigation proceeds if and when recovered by the County from third party defendants, The Districts also received "Repayment Claims'. The repayment claims are secured by a second-priority security interest on 65% of litigation recoveries by the County from r, third party defendants. The Repayment Claims are an "allowed" claim in the County's bankruptcy case under the terms of the Settlement. Under the Chapter 9 Plan of Adjustment filed by the County, any future receipt is contingent on this litigation. A litgation fund has been formed by the pool participants with approximately$50 million available to pursue litigation. The Districts' have recorded$88,340,640 as a non current receivable on their June 30, 1996 Balance Sheet, which represents the non-recovered principal balance of ,r investments in the Orange County Investment Pool. While collectibility of the receivable from the County cannot presently be determined, it is the opinion of the Districts' Management that the effect of non-payment of the claims would not materially affect the financial position of the Districts. 27 U (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) IU y U u u L' U U U u u u 26 u a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS u 29 COUNTY&1NR>TIOX OI9TNCTa OF OMNOB COUX]Y t9mdRBV 6BNYv&Met Jwo b,199B Wlln Cmderdln TdN fd Jwe m,1BB5 dWld MN VIM Nh dWM OXBId MI. WIIW ONad Im..t tM3 tl9.3 tl9.S W.H Ib..i tla11 Ne.1] I�..1.3 16� ]-BBF cuR«ea.de: cnnWUNpulrelRmR s 11,]]B s l.W5.BB0 f a]]x.055 { 6IM, $ x,ateaet f (5B]m s .675.m]) t (10I,WW) s l,W .BII t 21.M.516 s tae,s99,93> llnedn.nb ].762.�mil I20175] 59.6MIVlel.w tx,]6).177 IO.M 4, la)Nlw Y.5]5.]B] 1, 91AM 1,6AIW 1Belem CRNMb wiP teal e9om. eW.111 ]591]]] )678.13] 119.1]] .wJ.61 1W 1W RW 659 BIIW 1901m B.B)5980 SR>i541 lomNgNWlee'. PddMe 124AN 1,1]1.7M 11N.xxx IMASI` 1Ba5m ]M)W 1W.912 NMI 1.]27M 2.BY.CW t1,mx,YB pwvW Nlgoel I31,65a BIa,]]0 BIS.gi m5.151 115.35] m30'A 1t0.9+3 3<.WI 2).B03 3.6]S,)N 3,BNI,IaO Owhmanx 90reRmbnl.l eBa an no.a5e 9Baaao 9a01 t]x.xa m9.w2 19o.279 :w]u u.w] Wpm a.+m.es u61.7m TdvI�9wMId0f PY.Im 2M M 9o7sam aim U3741 ])] RI9.+21 low Iu5]Y 10750.849 M224S M.wMiae ba]BB 1,15 = "IM.WI Istm 175.W1 MA" mB,BW M,)91 218.M 3paa359 I.m1.2W P�RpeM dM 0111el aeule 134]i %bl 10<91 5131 SN? 1]OBe 9.145 1.3b ]III lmL Im5i6 Tad pmnlende 100i m Li69 M) )5I]9588 13"N IUMI]] 1)IM31N 103s+.30 IBB m 75)).06t mom M IKM?w R.I. Mmde: CIO qulWeme 5SW,535 +6,+b,bx 16.1m.5W 3,W1.SW I,B6B.W, 3,W9,171 9W370,I ]WRBJ ]]],W] 61)W.)09 1W.W90N lRw.aem. 9,t80.317 I9,]]]RN 12,M.213 11,7W379 I.7xx,3M 15,7OS161 liam..613 fi,6M.BW 1.01, 1 151,x3x,919 19,IBl.. RoniwNe,: Pm�Xe Mx9d 1m,502 M..16x 785931 213RI5 M..973 377,$)5 19T.590 110,]]3 N.In 2AI5.512 3, 9.W CvuwGm Me M..]N - N.7w 32.IM - 2M.2x 6m65B BwMm aMr Wwmm,md R,I ROM 99B.mB a1,Y3 YY].II6 Im.a)x 6).m1 5,893 May x.1W,0]I ],D3t, pIM, 5;B ISRS L'.]25 Y f50 Tdel 101Mdee Reede I])M9B9 6911UBb SB%S]W 15.I LB.B14 70011W 19]IXI BSB 115BI.119 I5]5.0]5 2248914 ]0R361.B69 OW Ndn dM139wwRXmll eWRd,e.Rda.,.,n 5m]R_• M,2M m2m)s1 5m3zW alW au 191a1.9n GM= 2276n6 I]1)n9 MW9Ya 9B.m1 mz OdMlee loops. PWM9 )56.zz3 7"975 Im 570 9zom 143.10 149 mB z3B I251 2V1115 2]i9633 P LI d.m and erylpwa.dmd. Lrd 515,113 1"lw .W,749 MM INN7ml.m 1.9]],W) M0,]51 MA51 Ma.WS ).tz1,6)3 i,1x1,6R 8sxe9e maNim+Rrililbs 5472,M IOtu5,5W 0,310.973 N,]YAIB S,310.= 39,Yt,b) URM3)S 3,913.+m n'slo 0 m.lw.W M.M.S3e SRxeW do l lrJlNas ia.310%, 1M,721.1m I45AIO.Bm l3.M.+Y 21,210.8@ 1],]5a,m+ 32A36]25 I,W.M 4,410.1% IW.IWABS Mx9m,sm 3wpReXmeeIIMIGRe 9.L60.Y1 x],]61.M5 21.119.I30 i1R0.Iss 3.YOa+6 >.xW.s+s s.Ma.m em.2B] IAu.IY a0A]t8B2 aO,149,B9B 6aRw.1 Pldx dw Remlmew6.e 1g49oe a.mm NAm.09 25 735 331Ip]6 ],)Bi,)m 45]9.m1 5,m"T 0.b.t0t 4MOT al.Nt.2)1 Y.1m,311 cTNutllblMpO911ee 1060.1.9W M'JW.]IR ]B WI)]5 1]m.2]B 91C1.593 IO BY.YO II Y3.M) ]M9PB IOBx M) IIS Mf MI Y.0.11.39] TalRl pgMi,aem dd pWpnenl W.iM.97I m1,WB,IB] b1.20B.656 BI,I53,m5 11.031.8II 110.605.121 )9,mt,6b t0.W,359 66,W9.B2B 1,01939x356 1.018,B69,3Bs Lee,eCd .d ERanddbll @5,mal311 192.WB.Im1 IWwow I+SW29551 1+0]0)Etl Im 6WM f2lW39191 12VS.♦_=. (ISM3�4Q 010.IB9.RY1 1292.]]6W Nd pepM.dRaW WUIP'wa W112.101 mdo 90].I]9868 I94101 W.317M ]B.INM W.65]]N BMW 61]W 371 ]PBSTJ.IM Mol BY Eimn wN�nw pin e.el mdi wlus O acpa�Re eseob I3I018ID 1301 B10 140961B ONm owls.RI w,l,ble vmmaelM pmdliulim 1RB.5'f0 6I9mi ]m Ib 1u5W IM)05 97973, IMo11 14 166 76aBi 3zP1.IM 3sW on TOXlnwl. t 99,+31,121 a W,010,971 3 370.2al.B60 t Y.078,2M 3 %.O 1.70 t IM.WI.M a a9.B91.611 5 19.610.a9 a 75.au.M 5 uW,W ,M 3 +282Am.32a See Iwdl. IC..i ) [ C [ [ [ [ [ [ [ �° C - C = [ C C C" [- C-- C- [ [ fl 1 [ l f f fl t 1 1 1 1 1 fl 1 1 f COUNW Sxttanox BlNxICTOOFOINNYECB W C.mm B•leme NeellC.-&..m Jwum,1BN WlN twnp•n11Ye TtlalaM Jmq m,IN$ DlI INebM OIeOM olW OINM 6NM ol.w Dili Dia Igl Ib.d tle t tl23 tle.4 tln.L f�.11 tln.Ia tl9.1 cRR.RI llwuuln pwede hem mmem easde. Smumepw•dR s 355.O19 s )n.en s 71732"61,QN PQwNYue U•iq•mn $ 9 ]N s 111,32. s m s ! 8. s tm, S 3N,4m S , N,3R M.3 1.w3. m t.Ome 191.n7 +S .Sm M.Y 01" 47,787 N,M 4,2MA73 2,421.614 4572 136 13M 1.)N }00] 15247 Ta l.1fr.dlmas panda Bmnwrtme WM M814 1107N3 1"1695 299p] m w 07 923N1 1311 W}977 8N)30} 7N 1n cmmmldelnnn wredelmm A xelnnm R.I.H.emr. e b M.ax NMI 60,M 191,+5 349.a2 1 . N a,m 8195 I.173.272 erebl. iMAN 1.)m,55] 1.571.811 3H. N 1NN 242.M H8,95 6 OB)].59 5,W.W3 0. mN 48.= B,m g141 Nm 45,7N 727AW ]]9.M3 ON 1391N ],161,350 3,303.8Y ❑mm•we hm9mem•pweels. mmem pmllpn 67IBm +.B]3.IN 1.710,N3 319,}B3 IN,S70 5131300 ]BOAS] 98.910 ]6B,3N 6.709.318 163.SN fbnrd cDII9Mlm Bella p]elx. mmem pwllm - - 1s,e39 +s.aN 1s.aN LmNUIn m pmllplgllM peyeds. gmeN pWlpn 1.mB.mB ].01A)1 ].Y11.012 ]N.1)3 9N.SY 737.061 5)]3N B.KO mnN 10.W.BBO IO.IN.0.tl T.mnnl liedlllln Mle M1mn mllbM a0d ]]SIGN 769.Bm 11N.m] 1LI5.528 9i1 M5 2<1}.Y19 1a1B9Y it}OS IBNI5• 259B)39f I9]0'.+.%) Bmq Ism I4BIIi1M.' tomwnaW eeeercea mgeW SiB.3W 6m.9m 33U. W.. M MAW 1 ,m 38.7W m.000 3.)II.SW 3.s5B.10} 0.hn•U vmponenllon pweBd BN.111 'jfi01}p 3.8)8.13] 5]e,tm 193,151 ]99,10) NI659 01 452 49J,110 B.BIB,NI 5.97B.SN Cdlme meMNe9menla pOYnle. eMlw. A,118 1N,B53 171.130 1B,ew 14.575 12.M ]).1W S,RN 1]A9 MB,nO ]]B.1]- MBmeOepende N.b9 1NA81 1I1.ISB 1B,BN <.5I5 13.BB3 5,7N � � LA,tm - Gsxr.l9elgmmR Bew.wY•de, Nmemanliromm m,lm - m.633 as.BeB CMmuln mpNtl W pw•Ble. va, pmlbnMm6M1mn1 MAI9,ON Im.10m 1m,t3t.eN zz.Ne.RB] I0.)3).00] z].In.a+O :6.6in.3N ms.63] 1,700.N1 "SWIM .L57 onenearanws a)NB 0M NM6 s)N6 Tmel bp�Mn14BIIINa SB.]101M 1L B100B5 1M.N]9ffi }1B}]6ml li]01HB0 }9}19.SN }6161.M0 e313e9 2]]53N 4N10e.623 e15500.}N TR llftll w millile 14=01 +L.MS28 2411OR4 18513e0 31 28 NT 576067 IBNN6 YI NI NB mI SO64m F.apdM. CmVIRUW®plel 4.911,M3 45,073Am m,014W7 12.N5,31K ICON] 17.311.6SR 13R55.012 s.M.M @.m3.Y1 314.SNM 210,m9Y1 O•WIne0 esmq+�eramublN CMdI) 9N2.Si0 1111M7 2M 2N.+25 wwg} •+WNI )BM) MSNI:: 122N.SN 171145971 st3]910]0 Ia's wal tan nRleaedry S9.mM.lO'f 2m.6i]250 }y 2B).132 NC9MG B>MB.mt 05.N25N1 NN3656 190N.161 )1155 BI1 6J1]19 N1 Tm•I tleMnlee mq M1VA wBmY ! 012I OI 3 }BOOIO R)1 S 0]0 J61M 3 NR]0)N 3 S9N1]N lJF6919R^ 3 86692011 3 I9810NB 3 ]503}0M S 1.3N4@,381 5 12B}A02M BNM pw4imhtlNpnMM!Wnme'IBBmI. 31 warm avllrnTmlJ asTxrcn os owNos couxsY Lmtlnlnp Slabmanl W Weanuae.Eryemep uY CMgea In RNameO Eem'upe Fa IM Yav EMM hme K,1986 WM LwryvMw TWla Nrtla Yev ErtleE Jvm b,1%s olebltl ol.w ouMa oubltl oi.tl 0. OYRIq MWq olWid tb.1 ULZ Na.3 tb.i NSA t6.2 No.t+ M" fm 1a Mli IM oa.r.wE mrenu.a: S.M.Wrpes s e.BK.zax s K,]BB,an a x2.599.N1 s z]as,sK s ds s T.aal.lu s a.:as,l]e s 90t.881 s K s N.aN s ]U,:sx1N Femw mEM.pegkn ieea �SI'mIvlo 26 ass �� 24M J �_2,lyg 8,s84 _�1pg m 12zMX)asz xaszN Taw aaer.orc re.muo. emm 21+1868 xxs2ez7 2,735975 3522M 7Na.247 3 wm 4713 e0l 19 Tomm owrauroe� leReaJNbnWwl.nlLlim: Ogle mMEmaPla alarm I.sN.m I,IM,B]] Iam IJ11.81a t.1Gem 150,sN x]5] ]eats sWAS a.sa].]6t urlitle. al.aso lo.2N am 2,na 10.sa1 u3.W iBAz- 2U.ue U9595 sWplKs 1.M 2x1,5]] x,oaa I6.ala IM xM.No 379= caNVJuel eeMus In,CB] Bs1.Nx TIJ,aN xae,a]a e1,Ka a]e,s2x 95.Ns 22]W 1a.UT :,PN,IN a"7,m piletldYleee z,Im 1]aa0 aZIN x.oxa lBK 7.52B 9.Mo s.ns s.N] N.]50 tl],s80 R" emd MI 1N 1,ao0 3.1N KI N aM I6E s1s a]E satt 2em .= Hameln uq melrMrema 1¢SB N.ne Il6,adl K119 19 E6,N8 VAIam N.aN ansas a1a.Pla JeM1tl apwelbq apnea elqullaA nM a.NB,Ns Is.zSs.ne 14.271,sx2 1,07058737IM I.sX99, a.aa.lro a—JUN s1fim 1.a14M a],m moo W,Wx in onw g9it 2mma nexm .]a 2p¢ �T a@2 _ a,2tg _ T� _��5 � Imo I47.1es T..clb ft egawa ollxr Nen Cepretlalbn eM mMlWbn _ZS1M l]Ne NI lseN.NB2,0741 2MOGO _t2141gfl 4 51MI sssma _1.STI 57561353 s+ar.»e OprN�q'umne Neel Oefve aegetiel'vleM emMivlbn 1.1]5,]20 3.630.021 5,&la,720 18B,Y0 I,Ml,59s 1.1NJlq (1Ii8,M51 251.830 (1,5ax,1152) 1a,BBB,6e 15,2N.183 OepadatianmwnaiWlea letllMa xS.Wa ]S.lm OegBa.IMan OlMr4tlNlx 2.NB.t2a 0.,&ll,txa 9Sa2.810 t,]]O.as] t,aNSW a,2leSIB 2.110305 259.810 2.238.N5 ]].a60.11a IM205113 bmMxallmmWm veW - - 1B.xEB rvnmo-.uan a umn InlTeee anw mm Orok r.luemacWlreJ.eeels 0.5))� F51]w 65170 Opralbg iMnO N..) 410,42011 re9llm 1359 M 11,501 W) rNx1N nrM.^+e 15.mm 14127_OGSe 1K1152 I "BMW) 18on�1 Seo e¢ampnyhg iMe@tle�e e W dare'�ep+l 2 _ r - � ILr- r- r r- r= �_ � r_ r-_ r_ r - r_ r r- r-- r- l 1 l [ fl I 1 [ [ [ l [ I [ I [ I fl l CWdA SANRLE OIBT)ELTBOi DR R W E CdMirurq BlelmvYd BereFy Egwee,w J—M.1InHWIM Eemupe(Cmtlwaf) Fw IM.o I..I.E .14b WM Cmpbalire Tale6lb w vw EMee.Fm]0.1P15 DIM. DIYnd OIYM O d Wmd Wu DeNq D.. Oseia IS].1 xo.a tb.3 NSA Nzl Vb z bo.11 x9 1, W 14 In im Hmapr.eq reremrai: Roperl]IWv 1.9) jw B.BM,S]0 MI= I.b4na I11>,nl t.eL9.5]0 1,m49M "MAN n)BS.BA M.e.1 m,]59 s,Nvos9 b.W1,]$ Iw].a]o Im9.9eo z9o9.]0) Saao.Bm s91,]n IW 90.]oo,9M 19.49o.7m Feeerdvp bale Brenl memre - Aa,9]t Lures 99.19s J7e9M MT We Irmo o3ss 93M MSM 9w 3essesl 3a]70 Jm)� T..mn(pnnhp rarMUM 3M"S 11Dt9.'_ I69Io459 tr]]I] ))]9056 5=219 3M34m 57I6Ie }MA]JB 5).:@,IIB 010 WB Nw�araliry eq:erwe. Mwnl ],7"41 2MIMI 21T7AB0 1.MIM )n.013 1,451,ml 1.=071 13.n8 ]<.C81 ]D.]]p,)s3 2].9M,BW OEs )65�1} aS51 i81 31116a9 S9B&N EBBI] P41 M1 3S9m9 ]PHW M.]BG ]BO91]9 9'tB.319 T.,ne9'eL 91Ia9 e.FpnvaJ 3M1X 95�9 9931]IB 1)mn] 11418Y 1Imm 1=I 91B 6731E W M316916 M751.919 M,b (lovv) R.DU'.109) (8]605) <.BBBXO 917,]]3 1.010.7. I,WI,M) (1,255,%0) 4MM2 (20.6=) 1AB7,051 4,W112 Ree bpedbion vq mMVLhi rMeCroea+ulWMeawN ]San Ml>oe na]BS _j]j,T� Nl16Clew IeeDPwl In rW elmG vb.rN lemmulelee MG.11 (2,M0.1091 I8I0.0]51 4.EB9lMl Bl),)n 1,010.70 IIf8,5]0 (1.355.'180) P><N] R]m.OB]I I,ro3,n0 5.378.1W Belevroesm:rgilvm^^Neun ae!tl, a9sebrB.ree. 27z9 19)4so.sss MI 5799es es]saSm 31>m 990 1B931399 e3w.910 IITI9.SY 189sxn131 M0.99]33e. 93s]letw b.e'vrv9 evaJr9.lemnn.dee ee5ol 1. ar.d Hb ! Y.bY1'L9 f I91571]A S NM Jux 135 f P8.97I J)9 S 3}]11839 3 ]B m1 M9 S M±9±t S 12M51]9 11111598Id f 9]a.791070 3 6tG 9]0]L See e..cwFwNre waceaeem wenwe reFm 33 coux3Y enxrtnnox Dmacre or oawoF coulm Fwg Yew E,,&WM M,MM ivtlx Yem EMN.Mha0,19F8 4Htn CakmelM Tavh rvtlre Yev FrtleG lun 30,1BB5 DAWd DIYmI DIMM IN. Wbd DlN DiMd DIfMd DINT. Ilz1 N9.3 HU HOA KRA tlPv &-U No 13 ml 1 1m im GN n9931mnI B])roerem9eMwnre.: Nm uM meNaawwalBeM WwermlCns S 53BO.elO } 19 eu9.a99 3 zi 161.OBe s 3B31Hm B _mm3 s e]zeul f ]m]zal s lm m] 3 nalw s FB.nSn] 3 IB.uuzm C¢N Bwn hwn(we]B/)epllel mp ra W M 1FYM t: IWS tle gJ911w1e le pgeM.l2eM mp epapmml (3.3]I,013) ISbls.es.1 I10.35..aL1 R374pml (1,ml,xfn 17.739.127I Is,emsnl OMa]el 2,797,215 (3e,m],Os9) Inne.nel IM a Pm4 ml aM me9s UNM[e0 p,70,M11 (7Ru.NI) (0.810.Bm) (t,n1,1e61 IBD2lex1 11]m.99e1 0.1mOn) (13.155) (A.B») 121.$90,@]) I25.4e.1m1 vrlrvl WI PMemns m caMAwlee agrWp.uon (I.3w.B80) 13aB9.2a1 Iltta,anl IW>ml I3i0.m31 I579.m21 lu7.391 IB.aeol (mlm) (10,1m.Om) 19.BSs.aml vnrlapsl prrnarxemmw � � � (IS,OWI - IIS.aro) (15.aa01 Prmtlyl ppmnN onlaaCb mmmnrlUl pOper - - IW,em.a93j vremee.9DmUN1eImMNWIm. leet@01 zal ve ue me 1u]a ram mtl 1so0m n?mel mzmz 115?]m eszSMl nm]oz1 NneeN 9rwkm fueeel ey mW1a eM rNeroe nwriro PNNIn reemmn na lm lml n9ma 9991 ra l9?B991 rae]mel rezamal n37emel rammn _SaO.a] rel aMeul 10219®zl Gen row M1om Imulbq.M .: RowO.tram tlx eW aimnlmeM. W,,MM] e2B.rol.M] ee .Wme 117.Bm.M ]]Allpm l57.402.759 Im,el7,307 ax,na"l 16.075,ml ISm.0 m Im,Bll.s]B P.M.almwlmmu P9,016m7I (s4nI.m31 (M.sm,e3Dl (140Mm0) (N.973,0]I (IMIX0,M) (INIM.es]) I50.431.273) (19.mo,m6) tl,]41.3m,utl MlemlremIMI 1,13x,000 B.OH.mI 9A]9An 1,m, m 1077.7130 2,161=4 1.SM.m 5e97e1 31,419 20,BS4A14 A,12].811 I....IaevMaj In MII9mlan urgm rererw reµnMYeyreemeM r81 Blltltlr !MI nM poNGea lu.ea I M IrvreeYry tl'nXl. rlt Yl0.1151 r774739111 40.289.BM1 121273m91 Iti e, ul r20.41e9G1 H9U4WSl rt tlB.mtl 130m 11B1 IZII OtOmtl i,eml9] NWIIMme(ae wmlIn. sh aM UM wwWMI. (N,919.990) 171.7M.Ml) 65,059.519) J2%WS.932) (I3,1142,8271 139.B15.Sm1 (23,b,1711) 11,]m,B15) 1,ul.m9 (ZB9115,m on,BD,]m) c... quXebMe,EpSmYpaSem 21 mm5 993135B0 �UQL $ 25 me Ml 19.92167I 33MI 112 Mxi� e.1BI01] 3+RI W419519 e72247Sl2 CBMUMfl.ne Iwft.mBa90m NO15 274M m9 3 29.14?0I0 E e110M 3 49010ae 3 30551B 3 2730zm 3 ]Ba.M2 3 4970 ma s OM310 lS N9419519 Sas eampvMrq it nwwl Man.UiM (C.ww,d) 34 r r_- r-:_ r7 r r- c r r- r. .- r- r- r- r - r- r r- r- r 1 ! 1 l fl t l fl H H t l ! l H l H I fl H WIJIMUWAn a9T91C]SOB 01 w 1!Couxry C xnkA"Slewwd dC.Flan(CdeldmN) FaWYwE WJ.b.1MS W%Cmp IWTdW Iw Ne Tw EM J.X.IMS 0iadid gahla M.m 0I.M DWd 01. A OI.Old DlwN Awd tlD..l t19.7 tiv.H tlx3 tl9.& NI Z tla.1x !19]2 rle.la .IB'A 1NS CeNOvxafram ape�¢ImO tllNllea: OBNOYtlq mSnY11We1 S 11 Bi31W1 f 19.b)OM1 f 195M.BN1 f 11lO1 B271 { IN7101 f 1}.IN.]NI f I3bB.2N1 S IBM f (4127NO1 f 1}3115}M1 S 11895)4E1 PNN»demtwsh n4dW4 mdns Sw11em1uM poMBee by gnrNlme: 0epe i x.B18,13< 9.N],1xJ B.s]x.S10 1]]O,N] 1,aB8,JW a,XB.sBt 2,1f0]M 3M,810 32b,Bes Sa.JN,IN J] MIMl.11.IUOm - M1.]M N].]M 20.M n.weefmn dm.m re»a I.M+,Ms a,BM.sxa 9.M+.IM zas 4 .n nn x sJD J +.+ ,tw. la 2u la.w - M. .Mx a,xN,eN Faew.I mp Nem OreNrewnue 301.Mt ONa mmaperdlrymvm» M,tN 218,&a M1.BN +b.Mo 43.235 f11.x91 N.M 90? z4WIW 7.M.]M z701,M Ch w in..tIIq»wneee OslaMl I2st5,M31 12.112.]MI 15M.9N1 fae5.O01 I4a.MB1 FM.NeI pa.SMl pJO,IN) O,e,M.4Nl ODISMI cndgee in»tle and n.alin»: Bedeew IeB+ee»)m eadnd nnI»de ]n.MJ 2,449,eM 22Md74 x9J.e7, aea,e13 BM,+op M3.M9 ]BRn U o)4459) 9,xN,20 pJq,Nsl oedew Dlldeaasl ln�uefmn dMr rneade - - - - 8,M4Y-0 9ed9ew lmdw»Imewtion alierBvmmnM}I pNsba 1.9W,1N ].9)1.N8 3.J11.251 @B.%! M3.157 1,44107 BOJ.131 JY3,J15 21),95] 11.98B.B1S (9),IN.3N) - B.v.e»Otl+eeel In dnx N 19,W6 - - 14015 3.31a,be cnc (lmeGea In inveMM» 11.517 zu.NS xN.l:a M.917 Ja,4M BI.B29 ss,BSB B,N] I117.9J41 nt.lpa 914.pfJ) OwealelmNu»)In pewN eMNMrewb 141,610 454,7M 431,673 &,507 N,x3S +IB.)Ot W.NS 14.YB1 aB,JxS 1.011.273 (1,d42O5) UedBMe lmde»q m Nnx ewl6 nd olemwl 1o.JN (x).BBa) iN.ais J).MJ ax.xM IM,4)31 SAIu s,OBx 94Mx 20.2. Ietx8e11 mNeew(eeNww)In In.v[muM. ye»Me RJO,JN) IBDLBNI OJInBI (M.3N) (1W.n11 I0.342I IISB.aal (32.010) IN, P.214.116) eM.791 Imaen leeaeeed lnfmwe egenaee 2M,240 441.103 Mx.MI 115.1N •v1,SL NAN <M,JOS 20.11112 bO,175 2,259.]M Ix,N),Y191 mde9w leeaee»I In rdeNlan gYMY loan48.M X..1N 170,1N 19AN tO5R99 xM.N] 25J1B (w 'm 5]).2N IN].NB) Irwee»(Jevew)ln lepeelle 4e,9N 2J3,1J4 - NA - 1.IJB 25,]13 Ne N9,9LU 911.sM I270,1111 I leeo Fewb annd.Oielna. - I9.B54lml mvwelBed9ewlln BDwlltllNme 4.673 13a5+ 13.BN 1.)Y 3.001 - 35.247 mvew leedeawlln wnae.+emeM ind 1s.ne N.em a.xu 1,3+3 e.esz +x,ns fe.e9D x,Me e,Me 1N,JM (SM.Ms) ImBNe INaeewl m eNwee umlvnwYan 2MM1 SB&2B7 ea4,7N IIo.M] 121,70 xM.bf 1M,48: 31.477 325.01 2Mx.JN Man mae.wle•dee-lm)ln aelna MO (d.Bq In 4]O.SSB t,0&.102 1,BN.9N 21],M1 34a.00.4 417,145 3M.JM MOOD Y96.JN 6,BN.BIx 1M]N I..feeae Iw)m somas le.enue 12aN 10.12e M.1N IM.)MI 1!N wM panaaa IuwBl tr/ CBdelmns f S9M810 ! 10 BBB.bB 3 23.191.9M f 3.01.1311 $ 3AN.M9 S 4)]9.321 f 11)117.24I i ]N.MI i 110,f49 f N.775.071 f 181.MLw1 S.eaaewnH.a lMapdtlanl Wdld(n0ort 35 u u u u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) u u u u u U 'U u u u u 36 u Statistical Section For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1996 n 03 n n� N - m o - County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Expenses by Type (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years $100,000 $90.000 $5D.000 $70,000 $80,000 $50,000 $40.OD0 $30.000 $20.000 $10,000 i - 1966a7 196748 195e-89 im8 90 19 91 lMl-92 1992-93 1993-94 199495 1995% ■Operating Expense ❑Nm Operating Expense Operating(1) Non-Operating Personal Maint& Depr& Interest Total Fiscal Year Services Utilities Other Amort Total Oper Expense Other Non-Oder. 1986-87 $ 12,935 $ 5.418 $ 12,845 $ 11,140 $ 42,338 $ 9.592 $ 1,308 $ 10,900 1987-88 15,752 4,956 16.910 13,164 50,782 6,964 374 7.338 1988-89 15,735 5,580 19.810 14,988 56,113 3,531 494 4,025 1989-90 19,170 5,578 19,224 17,726 81,698 9.368 1.048 10,416 1990-91 24,170 5,483 20,711 23,620 73,884 9,654 1.822 11,476 1991-92 26,757 6,920 20,416 23,346 76,439 11,825 2,405 14,230 1992-93 28,924 7,235 21,677 27,950 85,786 11,799 1,250 13,049 1993-94 28,886 4,589 21,599 33.988 89,062 16,964 2.414 19,378 1994-95 29.399 3,180 27,369 34.087 94,035 23,941 826 24.767 1995-96 32,660 2,978 26,114 34,001 95,753 20,731 7,648 28.379 (1)- The Individual cost components include a breakdown of the joint operating expenses,which,for 1993-94, 1994-95, and 1995-96. were as follows: Personal Maint& Depr& Fiscal Year Services Utilities Other Amon Total Ooer 1993-94 24,716 4,042 18,870 - 47,627 1994-95 25,861 2,630 22.791 - 51,282 1995-96 27.410 2,392 22,247 - 52.049 Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division 37 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years $105.000 - - S9o,000 S75,000 $60.000 $45,000 S30 000 $15,000 s � S(15,000) 19a4J7 lar!-0a 194a-0$ 1aaY-0a 19a0.111 1aa143 taB2-0] 1M$-04 1[M-0$ 1SB6M YOper Revenue ■Non-Ops Revenue �NetCartnd4ed Capital Net Contrib. Operating Revenue Non Operating Revenue Capital Federal Fiscal Service Pernil8 Prop. Cap SState Year Charge Ind Other Taxes Rights Irtensl Grants Other _ 1986-87 $ 6,302 $ 5,967 $ 1,090 5 24449 S 1,165 $ 26,261 $ 99 $ 2.282 $ 39,969 1987-88 9,418 6,299 1.349 27,368 1,009 24,823 1 648 1786 1988-89 12.775 16,669 1,919 28,768 324 22,091 865 5.238 (733) — 1989-90 23.009 1.241 31,122 1.242 18.993 2,070 1,887 94,132 1990-91 39.712 7429 33,395 1,172 17.279 64 3,496 15,683 1991-92 56,155 322 - 34.053 1,815 22,593 2,053 5499 12,898 1992-93 69.569 456 31054 2.228 27,569 18 1679 9.486 1993-94 70,908 540 35,854 - 33.226 - 6,450 13.471 1994-95 70,292 240 - 27.286 - 18,500 204 2.173 21,431 1995-96 68,328 120 - 29.285 - 20,209 - 3,068 4.209 Source: County Sanitation Disincts'Accounting Division 38 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Property Tax Levies and Collections (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $ 000 $40,000 E30.000 i $20,000 $10.000 198687 1987-88 198"9 1989-90 1990.91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995A8 DTalal Tax Ley ■Total Tax Collectlen %of Total %of Current Percent of Delinquent Tax Ols Delinq Fiscal Total Tax Tax Levy Tax Total Tax Collection Delinq. Taxes to Year Low Collection Collection Collection Collection to Lew Taxes Tax Law _ 1986-87 $ 26.267 $ 25,054 95.38% $ 1,013 It 26,067 99.24% $ 993 3,78% 1987-88 26,285 24,418 92.90 865 25,283 96.19 1,649 6.27 1988-89 34,118 32,816 96.18 942 33,758 98.94 981 2.88 1989-90 47,900 45,024 94.00 729 45,753 95.52 2.532 5.29 1990-91 72.180 68,841 95.37 845 69,686 96.54 2.774 3.84 1991-92 85.172 79,329 93.14 1,837 80,966 95.06 5,067 5.95 1992-93 92,926 86,511 93.10 2,152 88,663 95.41 5.465 5.88 1993-94 92,728 88.335 95.26 5,722 94.057 101.43 3.255 3.51 1994-95 91.562 86,294 94.25 2,239 88,533 96.69 2,942 3.21 1995-96 91,844 90,479 98.51 586 91,065 99.15 1,710 1.86 Source: Orange County Auditor-Controllers Office. 39 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property (Dollars in Millions) Last Ten Fiscal Years $140,000 $120.000 I I $80,000 $m.000 $40,000 i reo,000 � s 1994a1 1967i9 199929 /9a4Be 1X0.91 1991.92 1"M 199194 199499 INS." IlSecuretl Properly Assessed Value D Unsecured Property Assessed V91us Secured Property Unsecured Property Totals Ratio of Total Assessed Est.Actual Assessed Estimated Assessed Estimated Assessed to Fiscal Year Value Value Value Actual Value Value Actual Value Est.Value 1986-87 $ 76.969 $ 76,969 $ 2,987 $ 2.987 $ 79,966 $ 79,956 100% _ 1987-88 83,897 83.897 3,290 3,290 87.187 87.187 100 1988-89 88,632 88.632 3.464 3,464 92.096 92,096 100 1989-90 98,750 98.750 4.422 4,422 103.172 103,172 100 1990-91 109,048 109,048 3.575 3,575 112,623 112,623 100 1991-92 116,450 116,450 4,473 4.473 120,923 120.923 100 1992-93 122,510 122.510 4.687 4,687 127.197 127.197 100 1993-94 124.016 124,016 3,963 3,963 127.979 127,979 100 1994-95 123,525 123,525 3,871 3.871 127,396 127,396 100 1995-96 122,524 122.524 3,372 3,372 125,896 125,896 100 Source: Orange County Auditor-Controllers Office. 40 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Property Tax Rates-Direct and Overlapping Governments (per$100 of asessed value) ® Last Ten Fiscal Years m Fiscal Year 1906417 198748 198049 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Basic 1%Levy 1.00000 1,00000 1,00000 1.00000 1.0000D 1,00000 1,00000 1.00000 imcoo 1,00000 r Orange County No.1 -- Bond AR Fund-1951 0.00199 0.00138 0.00121 0.00024 - - - - - - Orange County No.3 Band MR Fund-1951 - 0.00521 0.00210 0.00039 - - - - - - Orange County No.5 "• Bond AR Fund-1951 0.00047 0.00034 0.00031 0.00041 - - - - - - Orange County No.6 _ Bond AR Fund-1951 0.00044 - - - - - - - - Orange County No.11 Bond MR Fund-1951 0.00030 0.00019 0.00017 0.00008 - - - - - - .n Bond MR Fund-1958 Q 00140 0.00076 0.00051 0.00021 0.00015 0 00012 0.00013 0.00019 0.00019 0.00018 ._ Total 1.00460 lQ0788 1Q4930 1001331M0151000123000131=101.0=9100018 v m Source: County of Orange Auditor-Controller's Office. w 41 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Principal Users For the Year Ended June 30, 1996 Sera-up B 12 g Marieim citrus Products 12% $ufldn Brands swil W astem E 8 P 18% oiarryland 21% FawrBe Foods 21% \ KtM 66 ClarF Pepsi-Cua 9alUirq 35 M1f HUM-W 38%38% lnc. adre Core At SYem 39% pwicentitges of Service Total Service User Chs� Cherie Revenues Sundor Brands $ 415,585 0.59% Kimberly Clark 389,776 0.55 Hunt-Wesson, Inc. 262,206 0.36 Marine Corps Air Station 277.834 0.39 Pepsi -Cola Bottling 248,082 0.35 Favorite Foods 145,773 0.21 Disneyland 145,725 0.21 Shell Western E 8 P 125.371 0.18 Anaheim Citrus Products 124,849 0.20 Seven-Up Bottling 119,454 0.12 Total $ 2,244,655 3.21% Source: County Sanitation Districts Accounting Division 42 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County _ Ratio of Annual Debt Service for Bonded Debt to Total Expenses (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years 70.00% 60.00% -- - - --- ---- - 50 oD% I eo 01% Woo 20.00% 1 p00% 0.00% -- - - 1956d7 1957-0 19 9 1969.90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 19 94 199F95 19 96 Total Operating Ratio of Debt Expenses Service to Total Total Debt Exclusive of Operating Fiscal Year Principal Interest service Derr. &Amort Expenses 1986-87 $ 1,607 $ 9,592 $ 11,199 $ 31,198 35.90% 1987-88 2,929 6,964 9,893 37,618 26.30 1988-89 3,002 3,531 6,533 41,125 15.89 1989-90 2,593 9,368 11,961 43,972 27.20 1990-91 2,396 9,654 12,050 50,363 23.93 1991-92 3,335 11,825 15,160 53,091 28.55 1992-93 6,075 11,799 17,874 54,096 33.04 1993-94 11,990 16,964 28,954 50,280 57.59 1994-95 9,670 25,439 35,109 55,298 63.49 1995-96 10,180 21,298 31,478 61,752 50.97 Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division 43 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt June 30, 1996 I I L 109S98 Assessed Valmlon(Lain 8lmpmvemenb Onty): Sconavo.199,tuadon) rde0ur2n9 s11,981,O1B,a54 re0evelopmem Inoemenbl lrelmtlon) DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEQ_T(Bmetl on tedevefterem adNabd all ptOwdy assessed Y IuaSbn of 5119.941IN1,882). Yrl %Moiable Debt8Yd0r9e Oren"County 75.41% $ 298.150 Maveownen Water DisblrJ of SoulNan California 16.923 90,288,481 Irvine United Soled DO W 99.997 7,n9,787 y OUa Shcool Dishide Various ;829,151 CllyalAwbNm 98.994 9,483,525 City of Inyme 100, 8.880,000 Mar Citles Various 2124,953 ou L Oren"County SaNtetlan District No.11 100. 45,w Iraw Ramp Water DbWd MproranaM Dbtizb Veriaur 320.)01,1)1 Water GisoW 93.01F2-100. 19,2B9.T29 Orange County Asamawnt Dlsbkb 100. 188,253,107 City ollmre 1B15 Act BOMB 100. M.4188,744 (y City of Tmtln 1915 Act BorWa 100. n,295,aw ONer CIty1915 Act troua N. 41.909,882 City olAwleim Commmlty Facilities Disbiar 100. 25.975.011) MAGIAN! George o Unelad Stl commuerer tricl Calls ity Distolce N .8es 74 No.80.1 99.995 53,838,918 City0County CBOMMm RFadlMm Dbbla t.M N.89) )54.M.18 Oitenf ommeaCommuntlyFmTs Db0itl NO.Bit 10a. 24,888,000 ONar Community Fadllties Dlalkb Various 04,198,789 OtherE Di aabicb Vrious 721,111111 TOTAL DIRECT OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT 31,228.811,351 l001 DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING LEASE OBLIGATION DEBT: %Aoolivble Orange County General Fund Ob9yatlem 75.01% $ 902A78,500 Oren"County Passion Obligation 75.461 20.1.11,13,518 Oren"County TeoWPion OMi9atlona 75.01 118,9ees'aw IJ Ore1ga County Trend OisMd ANnonry 75.481 15.929,491 CBaat Community College Dialed CerilSatee Of Par dw/on 99.333 20,287,900 SeddbEadr Community Coffee Distnel CeNfieatm of Participation 34.175 15,1`30,753 1 Brea-Ounrdaa Unirx.N School Dislmet CeNfiates of PeNtlwtlon 9101 31,810= L Santa Area UnlBed School District Cerifsatea of PaNdpatlnn 1". lo.M.000 Omno UnI Sdeol Dbmd Catiewtesof Patidpaon "Ns 12.048,551 Otler ShcoN Dstrid CeNfiarmoPamdptbn Vedadb 25.79!1 City Of Awholm General Fund Obli9allons "LlIN 2421M. de City of Costa Mesa General Furel Oteptions 100. 31'eare. " rl City Of Huntington Beads General Fund Obligations 99.078 ".6m.)35 City of Irvine General Fund Obligations 100. 82,1NIOND CM of Senb Ana General Fund Obligations 100. 134,283.324 Oter City General Fund ONVabons Various 123,82ZInn' 1l1 Orange County Sanitation District Cedifiatm o PenitlM pen 100. 408.210,000 Omer Spade Dbbid CeATNatea of Partldpatlan IN. 8.9115.000 lane Rand)Water Diseid Cerefiates of Partdwtion 98.983 59.371f.800 Orange County Water Dbtrid CerEfiares of Pdmdpmbe 98.342 20zm.a08 Wnidwl Water District of Oren,County Water Facilities Corpmalp 73.040 90.2981m y TOTAL GROSS OVERLAPPING LEASE OBLIGATION DEBT 52813,Bn.731 Leas: Orange County Treated Dblid Authority(80%se0-auppordng) 12,741.10 Orange County Weed District Cefteabs W Participation(100%ea8.supwtting) 202.838.809 City of Moreton se0supp eom,obligations 193.884,M3 MWDOC Warm FadlNm Corporation(to^W4.ppoNng) 80,298,172 FY Other tof-auppeo ug obl9elle. 4.834.BBT TOTAL NET OVERLAPPING LEASE OBLIGATION DEBT 32.339.M,M GROSS COMBINED TOTAL DEBT fA,p2,4BB,082 (1) J NET COMBINED TOTAL DEBT $3,548.282,219 ttl Exdutlm bx and revenw amdwtion was,revenw,molga"revanw aM larMbatlon bonds and wrvbonDed apilal lease obis"Iona. RaSm b: U Land&Impte remenb All Pm"ay Assumed Valuation Assessed VetwtlOn Combined led Deed (5408255.000) a m% e34% Total Dimd and Gredappin9 Tat and Asaeumenl Debt 1.06% 102% L GnKS Combined Total Dent 34T% 3.37% Net Combined TOW Debt 3.07% 2.97% I ' STATE SCHOOL BUILDING AID REPAYABLE AS OF 9Ta01g 9: $35.884,353 U Soune: Glifomb Mumdwl Stetlstla 44 u County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Bond Coverage (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years e _ 7 6 — - 6 - 4 3 --- 2 D 195E-57 0198788 ❑198889 O 1989-90 6 19 91 D 1991-92 D 19 2-93 0 199194 1111990.95 D 199596 Direct Net Revenue Debt Service Requirements Gross Operating Avail. For Fiscal Year Revenue(11 Expenses(21 Debt Service Principal Interest Total Coverage(3) 1986-87 $ 67.614 $ 31,198 S 36,416 $ 1.607 $ 9.592 S 11.199 3.25 1987-88 70.916 37.618 33,298 2,929 6,964 9.893 3.37 1988-89 98,649 41.125 47.524 3.D02 3,531 6,533 727 1989-90 79.563 43,972 35.591 2,593 9,368 11,961 2.98 1990-91 102,548 50.363 52,185 2.396 9,654 12.050 4.33 1991-92 122.489 53,091 69,398 3,335 11,825 15.160 4.58 1992-93 132,573 54,096 78,477 6.075 11.799 17,874 4.39 1993-94 146.979 50,280 96,699 11.990 16.964 28,954 3.34 1994-95 118,695 55,298 63,397 9,670 25,439 35,109 1.81 1995-96 121,010 57.561 63,449 10,180 21.298 31.478 2.02 (1)- Including non-operating revenues. (2)- Exclusive of depreciation and amortization. (3y Coverage requiremants per the Districts'certificate of participation indenture agreements range from 1.0 to 1.25. Although the coverage rate has fallen in the prior four years, 1995-96 reflected an increase. It is the Districts policy to be in compliance with all bond covenants and the Districts have the ability to raise user fees by a vote of the Board of Directors. Source: County Sanitation Districts Accounting Division 45 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Demograhic Statistics Covering The Entire County of Orange(1) u Last Ten Fiscal Years u (2) (3) (4) Population Median (2) Public School (5) U Fiscal Estimates Family Median Enrollment Unemployment Year (in Thousands) Income Age (In Thousands) Rate 1986-87 2,195 $43.264 32.0 338 3.3% �+ 1987-88 2,239 45,176 32.4 345 3.0 1988-89 2,280 49,916 32.8 354 3.1 1989-90 2,326 53,000 33.2 368 2.9 L 1990-91 2,411 56,380 30.4 385 4.8 1991-92 2,512 56.346 30.4 393 4.8 1992-93 2,557 54,380 30.4 400 6.7 1993-94 2.597 54,413 32.6 402 5.8 1994-95 2,641 55,507 32.9 412 5.5 1995-96 2,624 57,106 31.9 422 4.2 W L v Notes and Data Sources: r (1)- The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County services 470 square miles, or 59%out of the total 799 square miles that make up the boundries of the County of Orange. L (2)- Data Source-Demographic Research Unit California Department of Finance and Center for Demographic Research, California State University, Fullerton. (3)- Data Source-'The Chapman College Economic&Business RevieW'(estimates). u (4)- Data Source-Orange County Department of Education. (5)- Data Source-Orange County Employment Department u w 46 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits Covering The Entire County of Orange(1) ® (Dollars In Thousands) - Last Ten Fiscal Years Non- Assessed Residential Residential Property Value(21 Constr.(31 Construction(3) Total Bank Fiscal Calendar No.of Constr. Deposits Year Value Year Value Units Value Value 3 (3`4) 1986-87 $ 103,944,930 1987 $ 1.491,420 23.062 $ 1,788,598 $ 3,280,018 $ 16.167,780 1987-88 113.888,095 1988 1.324,186 20,522 1,779,847 3.104,033 18,0D3,803 .. 1988-89 125,682,613 1989 1,707,485 24,056 2,279,515 3,987,000 19,853,278 1989-90 141.941 723 1990 1,472,070 14,849 1,897,324 3,369,394 18,555,165 1990-91 158,342,197 1991 963,972 8,193 1,041,641 2.005,613 19.687.437 ® 1991-92 170.151.136 1992 704,135 7,698 1,297,452 2.001,687 27,223,764 1992-93 178,534,134 1993 520.214 6,122 1,083,565 1,583.779 22,837,820 1993-94 178 761.413 1994 523,480 7,333 1,338,519 1.861,999 24,925.640 1994-95 176,974,944 1995 622,189 11,726 1,576,136 2,198,325 24,979,857 1995-96 172.508.373 1996 586,590 10,323 1,597,418 2,184,008 24,866,776 r Notes& Data Sources: .d (1)- The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County services 470 square miles, or 59%out of the total 799 square miles that make up the boundaries of the County of Orange. (2)- Orange County Auditor-Controller. (3)- "The Chapman College Economic& Business Review. All amounts shown for 1994 are forecasted. (4)- The Bank Deposit amounts represent an annual average balance on deposit as of the last day of each quarter. 47 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Served by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County June 30, 1996 L V C�8 population CI�t Pooulatlon Anaheim 293,200 Los Alamitos 12,300 L Brea 34,800 Newport Beach 69,100 Buena Park 72,700 Orange 119,700 Costa Mesa 102,100 Placentia 45000 Cypress 46,400 Santa Ana 305:800 L Fountain Valley 54,300 Seal Beach 26,350 Fullerton 122,100 Stanton 31,900 Garden Grove 151,400 Tustin 63,600 v Huntington Beach 187,200 Villa Park 6,375 Irvine 127.200 Westminister 82,500 L La Habra 54.100 Yorba Linda 57,600 La Palma 15.500 23 Cities Subtotal 2.081,225 V Unincorporated 179,600 Total 2,260,825 L L L I✓I L JL� L� Source: Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. I V L 46 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Insurance in Force As of June 30, 1996 Type Insurer Deductible Limit All-Risk PropeM Ten Carriers Fire and Flood $25,000 $200 Mil. per Occurrence Earthquake Greater of 5%per $30 Mil. per Occurrence unit or$250,000 Boiler& Machinery Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co. $25.000 to $100 Million $100,000 Employee Dishonesty/ Faithful Performance Hartford Insurance Group $5,000 $2 Million Errors&Omissions See Employee Dishonesty/ Faithful Performance General Liability Self Insured Master Course of Construction Encon/Zudch 5%Values $45 Million �+ at Risk per Occur./ Location Travel &Accident ITT Hartford -0- $500,000 Insurance Co. Each Accident Workers' Self Insured .e Compensation 'y Excess Workers' Compensation National Union Fire $250,000 Statutory Limit Insurance Co. Each Accident Source: County Sanitation Districts' Risk Management Program 49 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY L Comparison of The Volume of Wastewater Treated With Expenses by Type (Dollars in Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years lions of L Ga Gallons of Wastewater Treated Fiscal Per Personal Maint Depr.& Total Interest Total Total V Year pay Services It ill. &Other Amort. Over. Expense Other Non-Oper. Expanses 1986-87 1 12,935 $ 5,4111 $ 12.845 $ 11,140 g 42,338 $ 9,592 $ 1,308 S 10,900 $ 53,230 L e; 7987-88 � 15,752 4,956 16,910 13,764 50,782 6,964 374 7,378 58,120 1988.89 ?; 15.735 5.580 19.810 14.988 56,113 3.531 494 4.025 60,138 L 8 1989-90 19,170 5,578 19,224 1],]26 61,898 9,366 1,048 10,416 72,114 1990-91 24,170 5,483 20.711 23,520 77,884 9,654 1,822 11,476 85,360 1991.92 0571 26,757 5.920 20.416 23,346 76,439 11,825 2.405 14,230 90,669 1992.93 "02927 26,924 7,235 21,677 27,950 85,786 11,799 1,250 13,019 98,873 L 5 199344 28,886 4,589 21.599 33.988 89,062 16,964 2.414 19,378 108,440 ti 1994-95 29,399 3,180 27,369 34,087 84,036 23,941 826 24,787 118,802 LI ax Y' x 1995-96 ., 32,660 2,978 26,114 34,001 95,753 20,731 7,648 28.379 124,132 LJ In 1989,the Districts completed a 30 year master plan which projected wastewater treatment flows to Increase from 275 millions of gallons per day(mgd)in 1990 to 300 mgd in 1995 and out to 400 mgd In the year 2020. In order to manage the increase in wastewater Bows,the Districts initiated a$1.5 billion 30 year capital expansion plan with projected debt financing costs of$1.2 billion and future operating and maintenance coats,excluding depreciation,of$62 million annually. Let As depicted from the chart above,actual wastewater treatment(lows increased from 249 mgd in 1986-87 to a high of 269 mgd in 1990-91. Flows suddenly dropped to a tan year low of 227 mgtl in 1991-92 and have since ratcheted themselms back up to 243 mgd in 1994-95,a year of above awnings rainfall. y The sudden drop in 1991-92 influent Is attributable to a combination of factors including: -the state-wide recession which not only reduced new development in Orange County,but caused a j migration of existing commercial and industrial facilities and reductions in hotel occupancies. L -the So.California water drought which lead to conservation measures and changes in water usage habits. Total expenses have Increased$52 million,or 72.1 percent since 1989-90 primarily as a result of the expected increases in wastewater Bows. Of this increase.depredation expense represented 20.2 percent and debt service interest represented L another 21.8 percent as a msuft of the capital facilities expansion that has been completed. The Districts are currently performing a master plan update to ensure that future plant capacity will match more closely the future needs of the residents of Orange County. L L Source: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. L s0 1 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Biosolids Produced Last Ten Fiscal Years MADD 45,000 40.000 35.000 30,000 y _ �s 25,000 2D.00D 01988.87 0 1997.88 0 1988.89 O 1989-M 0199(W (31991.92 ■1992-93 01993-M 1111199495 ■199598 Fiscal Year Tonnage 1986-87 29,519 1987-88 32,939 1988-89 45,164 1989-90 48,439 1990-91 44.968 1991-92 43.464 1992-93 41,964 1993-94 39.650 _ 1994-95 40.228 1995-96 38.802 Source: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 51 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Miscellaneous Statistics June 30, 1996 L✓ District Organiration: 9 Districts serAcing 23 cities,unincorpo ated areas and four special districts as fdl.: District Na.1 District No.3 District No.) IJ County of Orange County of Orange County of Orange Was: Cities: Cities: Orange Anaheim IMne Santa An. area, Orange L Tustin Buaaa Pak Same Are Special Districts: Cypress Tustin Coale Mess Sanitary Fountsin Valley Special Districts: District Fullerton Costa Mesa SenRmy L Huntington Beech District La Habra La Palma Los AlamRos District No.11 Santa Me County of Orange LI Seal Beach Cdycf Hun inglon Beach slanlorh District No.2 Special Districts: District No.13 County Orange Garden Gone Sandmy Canty of Orange V Cues: District Cities: Anaheim Midxay CBy Serihery Brea arm District Orange Fountain Valley vorba Linde Fullerton District No La Habra County of Orange Orange City of Nexpat Beach District N.14 L Placentia County oforage Same Me District No.6 Cities: Ylts Pad, County of Orange Irene yorba Linda ONm: Orange Spacial Districts: Nevpet Beech Tustin u Garden Gone Special Districts: Special Distride: Sanitary District Costa Mess Sanitary IMneReach Water District District 1 Governing Body: 29 member Beard of Directors LI Staff: 606 ful4Enre and 18 pat-time employees operatfoml Date: July t,195d u Authority: California Health a Safety Cade Section 47W eL set. Servlcea: wastexaler collection,treatment,and disposal. L Service Area: 470 sguae miles Population Served: 2,2W,625 Yap Operations: Total miles of bunk and subtrunk anvas 650 miles Number of pumping stations-22 Average Daily Flea-Plant No.1 79 MGD (1) I Average Daily Flex-Plan No.2 158 MGD (1) Tote) 237 MGD (1) (1)- millions of getters per day. L Source: County Sanitation Districts'Accounting Division. . 52 IL+ a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California Finance Department Accounting Division (714) 962-2411 mailing address, P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 927 2 8-81 27 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 csooc 10196 FINANCIAL & OPERATIONAL REPORT . . hP � OG > Z z.. � o � � n g9p�cT/N_ THE ENV\P�N�� County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Table of Contents Section1 - Overview........................................................................................................1 ,r FinancialReport - Section 2 - Joint Operating 8 Working Capital Budget Review Charts on the Gallonage Charge by Department..................................................1 Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge......................................................2 Summary of Expenses by Major Category............................................................3 Summary of Expenses by Line Item......................................................................4 Summary of Revenue by Line Item.......................................................................6 Comparison of Expenses by Department..............................................................7 Chart of Staffing Trends........................................................................................a Section 3 - Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Graphs by Type and Funding Source.................1 Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Current Year.....................2 Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirement - Project Life .......................6 Section 4 - Budget Review by Districts r Summary Budget Reviews - All Districts...............................................................1 District No. 1 Budget Review................................................................................2 District No. 2 Budget Review................................................................................3 District No. 3 Budget Review...............................................................................A District No. 5 Budget Review................................................................................5 District No. 6 Budget Review................................................................................6 District No. 7 Budget Review................................................................................7 District No. 11 Budget Review .............................................................................8 District No. 13 Budget Review..............................................................................9 r District No. 14 Budget Review............................................................................10 Section 5 - Self Insurance Funds Budget Reviews Public Liability Fund Budget Review.....................................................................1 Workers' Compensation Budget Review..............................................................2 Operational Report Section 6 - Performance Objectives and Work Plans......................................................1 L 1996-97 First Quarter Review V I Vi L L L L This Page Left Intentionally Blank I u v Lr L L L L L V LW Overview First Quarter Financial & Operational Report September 30, 1996 The Finance Department is pleased to present the comprehensive financial and operational report for the first quarter ended September 30, 1996. This report consolidates the financial and operational accomplishments of the Districts with the intent of providing the Directors, staff, and the general public with a comprehensive overview of the financial condition of the Districts, report on the status of all capital projects in progress, and provide detailed analysis on the status of each Division's 1996-97 performance objectives as established in the 1996-97 adopted budget. A summary of the sections contained within this report is provided below. Joint Operating & Working Capital Budget Review., At September 30, 1996, 24.06 percent or $11,717,772 of the 1996-97 net joint operating budget of$48.7 million has been expended. Although net costs have increased 5.49 percent in comparison with the same period last year, the Districts' are at 24.06 percent of the budget. The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 1996 is $524 based on flows of 22,345 million gallons. This is $32 or 5.76 percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of$556 while flows are two percent higher. Comparison of 10 Quarter Results with Year-End Actuals (Budget) Last Fiv%Years SS 3] 560- 53031 � 535 ti 540 ]3 523.t9 5 49 520 aw a 500 480 480 f ee 440 420 — T 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 tat Year tat Year tat Year tat Year /sl Annual Ctr end Ott end Qtr end Qtr end Qtr Budget Section 1 - Page 1 1996-97 First Quarter Review " 6. As highlighted in the graph shown on the previous page, the cost per million gallons at the end of the first quarter has been somewhat lower than at year-end for each of the last five years. This fluctuation is due in part to the time it takes to complete various r operating activities and when they can actually be recorded within the Districts' accounting records. The 1996-97 first quarter actuals are comparable to first quarter actuals of five years ago without even adjusting for the cost of living. In addition, the 1996-97 first quarter actuals are even more conservative in nature due to: • the preparation of better estimates on the accrual of environmental monitoring u services and the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority services received during the first quarter. L • the allocation of adjustments to prior period Joint Operating Revenues, such as the wastewater treatment services provided to the Santa Ana Watershed Protection Agency, to the current as well as future quarters once the actual revenue figures are known. r Based on the results of the first quarter, staff believes that the Districts' are on target with the 1996-97 budget and will approximate the budgeted gallonage charge of$556. r Some of the significant Joint Operating results as of September 30, 1996: • Salaries and Wages- Salary and wages are at 25.37 percent of budget after the �+ first quarter while staffing was 17 members or 2.72 percent below the total approved in the 1996-97 budget. The slight overage is primarily due to the bonuses paid in the first quarter to those professional, supervisors, and managers with exceptional performances in the prior year. • Repairs and Maintenance- First quarter expenses for"Materials and Services" and "Contracts" related to Repairs and Maintenance totaled $737,397, or only 19.5 percent of the combined budget of$3,772,700. However, staff expects this account to approximate budget by year-end as unpredictable equipment failures occur. " • Natural Gas- Natural gas is purchased as a supplement to the methane gas that is obtained from the digesters as a by-product and used to fuel the central generation Ir unit that provides the electricity to power the Districts' treatment facilities. Natural gas expenses are currently at $345,967, or 35.3 percent of the annual budgeted L amount of$980,000. This amount is somewhat inflated due to the high estimates that were made for September prior to receipt of actual billings. However, natural gas purchases will have to be carefully monitored throughout the remainder of the I year. L Section 2 - Page 1 provides a comparison of each Department's contribution towards the gallonage charge for the quarter ended September 30, 1996, as budgeted for 1996- r 97, and as actually incurred for the year ended June 30, 1996, in chart form. The r Section 1 - Page 2 r Overview charts for the quarter end September 30, 1996 and the 1996-97 budget are quite similar while comparisons are difficult to make with the 1995-96 actual chart since the combining of operation and maintenance functions, the establishment of the General Services Administration Department and the consolidation of Information Technology into the General Services Administration Department. For more detailed information, Section 2 - Page 2 provides for the divisional contributions to the gallonage charge through September 30 for the last five years, Section 2 - Page 3 provides a summary of expenses by category through September 30, 1996 and 1995, Section 2 - Page 4 and 5 provides a summary of expenses by line item through September 30, 1996 and 1995, Section 2 - Page 6 provides a summary of Joint Operating Revenues by line item through September 30, 1996 and 1995, Section 2 - Page 7 provides for a comparison of expenses by department for 1994-95, 1995-96 and 1996-97 year-to-date, and Section 2 - Page 8 provides staffing trends over the last _ five years including total authorized, actual staffing positions filled, and vacant staffing positions. Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Review., s$o,000.000 $5010001000 $00,000,000 530,0001000 $20,000.000 $10,000,000 w Outlays to Projected Budgeted date- 1996-97 1996-97 $10,086,000 Outlays- Outlays- $53,869,000 $A418951000 At September 30 1996, total Capital Outlay Revolving Fund outlays totaled $10,086,000, as depicted by the chart above, or 22.5 percent of budget. Total projected capital outlays for 1996-97 has been revised from $44.9 million to $53.9 million due to the acceleration of several major projects such as the: • Secondary Treatment expansion to 80 MGD at Plant No. 1 Section 1 - Page 3 1996-97 First Quarter Review .L • Fire Protection, Signs and Water System Modifications at both Plant No. 1 i and 2 �+ • Primary Clarifier Rehabilitation at Plant No. 2 • Chemical and Plant Water Modifications at Plant No. 2 • Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 6i For more detailed information, Section 3 contains project expense listings. V Budget Review by Districts: At September 30, 1996, revenues of all Districts totaled $9.1 million, or 7.15 percent of budget. Tax allocation and subvention revenues, budgeted at $31.0 million, are only at 4.3 percent of budget, or $1.3 million, and Other (User) Fees, budgeted at $68.0 million, are only at 1.5 percent, or $1.0 million, because most of the property tax apportionments and user fee receipts that are collected by the Ir County through the property tax roll are not distributed to the Districts until after the first quarter of each year. Connection fees, budgeted at $4.5 million, are currently less than one percent due to the lack of growth within the Districts. Interest& Miscellaneous Receipts are also high at 29.2 percent of budget, or $6.0 million, because of both larger available cash balances and the greater of the 7.5 percent interest rate yield over the 6 percent yield that was anticipated in the 1996-97 budget. Conversely, expenses and outlays of all Districts totaled $40.9 million, or 27.6 percent of budget at September 30, 1996 with no major deviations. Self-Insurance Funds Budget Reviews: The Districts' are self-insured for General y Liability and Workers' Compensation and the Districts' provide separate fund accounting for the revenue and expenses incurred in managing these liability Claims. The revenues to these funds represent individual District contributions based on each L District's share of Joint Works Operating Costs (sewage flows). Expenses to these funds include actual claims paid, claims administration, and excess loss policies. I V The Self-Insurance Fund revenues totaled $141,000 or 22 percent of budget at September 30 while total expenses were $272,000 or 41 percent of budget due to higher claim losses than anticipated. Operational Review: The Operational Review section of this report pertains to the L status of Performance Objectives as of September 30, 1996. Performance Objectives were established for each Division within the Districts and I. incorporated into the 1996-97 Adopted Budget. The adoption of these performance measures allows for the progress of the Departments and Divisions to be measured, achievements recognized, and opportunities for improvement identified. As a tool to further define divisional performance objectives and to ensure success of the Districts' critical goals for 1996-97, workplans were also developed at the Divisional level. Section 1 - Page 4 u Overview At September 30, 1996, the Districts had nearly 550 first quarter workplan milestone tasks that required completion or some work progress and 80 percent of these milestones, or the required progress toward the achievement of these milestones, had been met. In addition, 82 percent of the budgetary performance objectives for each division and department were also achieved. Section 1 - Page 5 Y�Y 1996-97 First Quarter Review L L L This Page Left Intentionally Blank v j u V J L L i u u I u u u Section 1 -Page 6 r J. O. & W. C. Budget Review Departmental Gallonage Charges For the Three Months Ended September 30, 19% Engmeenng 2n 06M 50% Fee. ]% E. Npmt 4% T. Sure. d% 3% J% Departmental Gallonage Charges For FV 1996-97 Budget Evgneer O&M 58% M/R d% Departmental Gallonage Charges For Fv 199596 Anual Ma.nt /R 2� 3% brto Svxces / d% t F.n % Ex Mgmt l% - Tech S a 5% Er, 2% Section 2 - Page 1 L 1996-97 First Quarter Report L Divisional Contributions to Gallonage Charge For The Throe Months Ended September 30 i 1992-93 1993A4 1984-95 1995-96 1996.97 1996-97 �I Actual Actual Actual Actual Annual Budget Actual Annual Flow In Million Gallons 21,340.80 20,544.34 21,794.23 21,B07.71 87,800.00 22,3M.81 1 2150 General Manager SJ4 7.13 14.96 13.54 11S7 14.82 Ysl 21W Boers Secretary 0.92 0.81 0.56 1.18 1.B5 1.48 2170 Management Support 3.51 3.20 2.02 - - - 2190 Communications 5.60 7.20 6.48 ircl Total Management 10.17 11.14 17.54 20.32 20.72 21.78. -_ 2510 HR Administration 8.89 a.81 1024 S W 2520 Human Resources - - - 2.0 5.16 5.60 2530 Safety B Emerg Response - - - 5.75 11.15 6.51 2540 Education 6 Training 8.96 SAi Total Numen Hesouroea 8.89 8.81 10.21 13.70 26.27 1823 y 2210 or of Finance 13.89 15.34 16.00 2081. 20.86 19.68 2220 Accounting 5.37 6.20 6.52 11.56 10.94 11.72 2230 Purchasing B Warehousing SAO 6.39 5.34 B.50 8.01 6.96 L Total Finance 26.16 27.93 27.66 40.87 39.63 38.25 2410 General Service Administration 11.59 13.93 11.98 2.77 7.93 7.23 2420 Handsome Support - - - 4.19 6.66 5.19 243D Sohware Support - - - 13.44 11.31 8.47 V 2440 Plant Automation - - - - 4,62 1.69 2450 Collection Facilities Maintenance 2.55 3.06 2.47 5,07 3,72 4A8 2460 Plant Facilities Maintenance 43.21 43.20 36.11 38.30 W.85 39.20 Total General Services Mmin 57.36 60.19 50.56 63.78 73.10 88.46 (rtl 3410 Oms B Maintenance Admin 10.52 U 9.12 1648 la.06 14.91 3420 Oms B Maintenance Scheduling - - - 5.06 5,19 4.24 3430 Plant No l Operaticne - - - - 74.99 76.76 led Wit Plant No.2 O;mcdom - - - - 119.22 108.90 UN Mechanical Maintenance 63.29 55.75 62.19 50.05 51.80 52.37 3460 Electrical Maintenance 17.98 19.16 17.15 17.65 24A5 17.78 U70 Instrumentation Maintenance 21.29 26.25 27.59 27A1 .75 28.06 two Instrumentation29 3490 Central Generation - - - - 20.22 26.48 3480 Plant Operations 199.61 181.50 14815 2W.04 Total Opera0ons 31283 292.90 264.67 320.39 =.a$ 326.50 � 3510 Dir of Tech Swim 5.22 3.26 1.64 7.08 6.72 6.67 3520 Compliance 19.67 20.24 04.62 - - 3530 Cone,Recl, Reuse 53.54 70.48 54.911 3540 Air dually 5.33 B49 10A3 - - - 3560 Environmental Mignon - - - 27.51 40.36 37.08 3580 Em Sciences laboratory 45." 45.61 35.44 39.37 38.48 32.15 V 3590 Source Control 9.20 8.52 4.52 7.70 3.03 4.43 Total Tseh Services 138A3 154.61 141.34 81.67 90.69 80.14 3710 Dir of Engr 0.69 0.25 037 1.99 0.76 1.19 3720 Planning B Design(Design®95-96) 3.41 (1.56) 1.70 5.39 1,76 2.68 6W 3730 Engineering Planning - - - 2.66 1.n 1.86 3750 Inetr 6 Controls - - - - - - 3790 Constr Mgmt 3.74 5,16 2.97 2.00 4.69 3.26 Total Engineering 7.84 3.85 6.04 12.04 8.99 9.18 V Total Esimmus 661A8 559.02 617.25 552.77 602.17 680.63 Less Revenues (37.99) (38,18) (47.a1) (43.43) (46.23) (36,12) V Net JO Expenses 623.49 520.84 469.43 509.34 565.94 524.41 li Section 2- Page 2 V J. O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Major Category For The Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 Exp. Exp. Incr. Incr. Percent Budget Tlrru Thru (Deer.) (Deer.) Budget Remalning ,., 1996=97 913856 grJORS $ % Realked Budget Net Saunas,Wages&Benefits 27.071,590 6.766.020 6,737,662 28.468 OA2% 24,99% 20,305,570 d Office Expanse 526,300 69,601 76,833 (7,032) - 13.22% 456,699 Odor Control B Chemical Coagulants 4,700.600 1.001.379 818,773 182,606 22.30% 21.30% 3,699221 Contractual Services 6,019.000 1,461,612 1,631,781 (170,169) -1043% 24.28% 4,557,388 Professional Services 1,55520D 375.038 321.803 56,235 1747% 24.31% 1,177,162 Equipment Charges 196,000 60,435 56,936 3,499 6.15% W83% 135,565 Repair&Maint, Materials&Services 3.772,700 737,397 841.028 (103.631) -12,32% 19 55% 3035303 Research B Monibdng 2,504,900 546,177 338,480 207,697 61.36% 21.80% 1,958,723 Training 714,000 100,313 90253 10,050 - 14.05% 613.687 Utilities 2,548,800 765.344 567,467 197,877 34.87% 30.03% 1.783.456 Other Materials, Supplies m &Outside Services 3.140,910 638.518 573,917 64,601 1126% 20.33% 2.502.392 Total Joint Operating F�eenses 52.750.000 12.524.834 12,054,623 470211 3.90% 23.74% 40.225.166 d Revenues&Offsets (4,050.000) (807,062) (947.039) 1391977 -14.78% 19.93% (3242,938) Net Joint Operating Expensa 48,700,000 11.717.772 11 107.584 610.188 5.49% 24.06% 36.982228 rb Gallonage Flm(MG) 87,600.00 22,344.81 21,807.71 537 2.46% 25,51% 66255 Gallonage Flow(MGD) 240.00 242.88 237.04 5.64 2.46% uv Gallonage Charge($e/MG) 555.94 524.41 509.34 15.08 2.96% .r Section 2 - Page 3 11 Iw 1996-97 First Quarter Report L Summary of Expenses by Line Item For The Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 L El(P EXP EXP INCR BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (OECR) Description 1996-97 9130195 SIM96 BUDGET 9131 f u Salaries. Wages, &Bor.% Selanes&Wages 31,782,010 8,063,075 2&37 23,718,935 7.035,264 1,027.811 Employee BeneBis: L Restranern 3,107,310 821,837 20.01 2,485,473 678,844 (57,007) Workers Comp 204,800 611 29.58 W.224 51.931 8,645 Urempaynned r Ire 59,000 21,801 36.61 37,399 4,054 17,537 Group Insurance, 2,733,970 769813 27.75 1.975,157 899,980 (141,167) L Untorm Randal 76,500 14,225 18.60 62,274 12,718 1,505 Total Benefits 6,181,550 1,477,063 23.89 4,700,W7 1,647,537 (170,48,1) I II Salaries, Wages, BBeogts 37,983,590 9,540,126 25.13 28.423.462 8,682,e01 867,327 u W.O.salaries&Ben.aloe Direct Charges-(' /Oust (8,987,000) (1,777,548) 25.44 (5,209.452) (1,419,99D) (357.558) V Coss Alles-Corfinsl (3,905,000) (995560) 25.62 (2,908.440) (525,259) (471,301) W.O.Salaries&Benefits (10.882,000) (2,774,106) 25.47 (8,117,892) (1,945,249) (81 Net J.O.Payroll 27,071,590 6,766,020 24.99 20,305,570 6,737,552 28.465 6j Mall,Supply,&Services I, Gasoline, Dead&Oil 203,500 97.888 33.36 135.612 29,353 38,535 L Insurance 1,487,000 329,864 2217 1,157,336 363,707 (34,043) Memberships 55,= X13D 53.18 20,470 28,400 6,73D Office Fes-Supplies 162.903 24,393 15.95 128,507 28,286 (3,893) O se Automation 207,50D 11,875 5.72 196.825 30.347 (18,472) del Other 105,8W 29,502 27.94 76.098 18,000 11,502 Minor FumBurs,Fixturas,a Bg300 3,831 6.35 56,469 - 3,831 Operating Supplies Oder Control 1,593,3D0 294.021 18.45 1299 M 245,769 48252 Sulfide Control 1,403,900 305,089 21.65 1,103,811 246,097 58,992 1 j Cherrucel Coagulants 1.296,100 354,084 28.05 934.016 241,791 122.205 V Lab Chamcals&Supplies 400,3DD 38.185 9.54 362,115 85,109 (46,924) Tots 107.800 20,218 13.76 87,582 24,439 (4,221) Siv, Paints,&Jan.Supplies 129,200 25.496 20.51 102,704 27,842 (1,346) OBar Operating Srppiiss 197,gDD 38,990 18.89 160,910 51,780 (14,79D) L contractual SeMces Groundskeeping &Janitorial 159,700 18,058 11.69 141,032 21,705 (3,(137) 1 ` Outside Lab Sonioas 91,200 10,094 11.07 81,106 9,364 73D bw Solids Removal 4.704,000 1.161 24.71 3,541.691 1.373,753 (211.444) Otiar Waste Disposal 110,OOD 5,873 5.34 104.127 13,009 (7,135) Oxygen Rand Oper 455,50D 118,932 25.55 346,568 127,764 (8,am) Other 488,000 145,735 29.83 342,864 66,186 59,550 V J Ij V Section 2-Page 4 L J. O. & W. C. Budget Review Summary of Expenses by Line hem For The Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 ro ExP EI(P DIP INCR INCR BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECK) (DECR) .e DESCRIPTION 1996.97 9130196 AM96 BUDGET 9130M 9 % Professlonal Services Lela WAX) 206.935 31.52 449.6B5 187,414 %521 10.42 Audi&Acmuning 44,100 20.181 66,12 14,939 15.844 13,317 84.05 Engineering 225.400 43.151 19,14 18Z249 27.797 15,354 55.24 Other 629,10D W791 15,70 5W.309 K748 0.043 &85 Printing&Publication Rquuln+laee 2SZ40D 53.748 21,29 1911,641 2Z367 31,381 140.30 Printing Outside 107.300 9,341 8.71 97.959 3,064 5,977 154.94 Photo Pnrmsing 31,2DD 9,377 30.05 21.823 5.834 3,543 80.73 Noiim&Ads 21.800 1,980 9,17 19,62D 10.847 (8.867) (81.75) c, Rom&Leases Oieside ENup Renal 67.000 25,92D 45.47 31,080 33.712 (7.792) (2111) Disoitt Epup Refal 139,000 34.515 24.83 104,485 23.224 11,781 48.62 Repairs&Maintenance Mateias&Seth. Z843,800 674,105 20,19 Z299,495 625.349 (51.244) (&to) Controls 929,100 163,M 17.5E 765,8W 215,679 (5Z387) (2429) Research&Monitoring Emnm Muiltonng 1,965900 459.677 23,39 1,506,023 288,335 171,542 50..49 c' Air Ouain Mmitonrrg e8.800 - 0.00 68.6DO - 000 Researrr 470,400 86,300 18.35 384,100 50,145 36.155 7210 Trsal, Meetings &Training Modirgs 153,000 33.607 22I0 119,193 70.173 (38,38M (51.82) Tranirg 561.000 esSOs 11.65 494.494 20,080 46,425 231.21 UncdleOable Aawb - 0.00 131 (131) (101100) Utilities �. Died For Gewfaters 14,800 - 0.00 14,800 - - 0.00 Pass 813,400 217,625 25.76 5%772 204,998 1Z03D 6..16 Nateal Gas MOOD 345.957 35.30 634,033 245.545 10D,422 4D.90 Tdaphone 106,000 25,677 24.22 80,323 28,512 (836) (315) Water 634,BOD 176,072 27.75 458,52B 90,412 85,880 94.74 Otim Expenses FragM 53,7010 10,119 18.54 43,581 10,317 (198) (1.92) General &Sally 319.900 54.415 17.02 255,455 7Z451 (AWS) (24.65) Agrnd Operating Fees 185,200 67.916 35.47 118,284 36.078 31,898 8&25 Pnor Years Fxpese - - O.OD - - - OAO Ohe NunOpe Expense 70,300 9,002 1281 61,295 14,837 (5,836) (3933) m General Manage CcrOngacy 270,000 0.00 270,000 0A0 Net J.O.-Maas,SupA&Sarv. 26,031,100 5.=610 22-48 20.178.490 5,445,201 4D7,409 7.48 Coat Alloc-Corf&Other (352.690) (93,796) 26.59 (258.894) (125.130) 34,334 (7&8O) Net J.O.-Marls,Supp.&Sm. 25,673.410 5,758,514 22.43 19,919.595 5,317.071 411,743 &31 Total J.O.Requirements SZ750,000 1Z624,834 23.74 40,225,165 1Z054.623 470.211 3.90 tns:: Rese4x+ (4.050.00(1) (813.625) 2109 (3.236.372) (947,039) 133.411 (14.09) cost All=ttian -CORF,Dlsts, &Otl er 6,566 O.OD (6,566) 6,556 0.00 Net Revenue (4.050.ODO) (807,082) 19.93 (3,242,938) (947,039) 139.977 (14,78) Net J.O.Expenditures 48,700.000 11,717,772 24.06 36,982,228 11.107,584 610.188 5.49 Section 2 - Page 5 1996-97 First Quarter Report 1V Summary of Joint Operating Revenues by Line item U For The Three Nbnths Ended September 30, 1996 REV REV REV INCR INCR L 1r BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECK) (DECR) DESCRIPTION 1996-97 SM96 SM96 BUDGET 91=95 9 % Interdstseneruse 1.700.000 247,208 14.54 1,452,792 411.692 (164.494) (39.95) Wastdrauler 400,000 86.581 21.65 313,419 78,193 8,388 10.73 Irwd sludge dsposal 848.000 218.398 25.75 829,B02 206,000 12,398 6.02 i Scrap sales 20,000 35 0.18 19.965 12,739 (12,704) (99.73) b Other sales 2,000 176 8.80 1,824 446 (270) (60.54) Biosdids reuse 5,000 - - 5,000 - WA Rents&lesses 75,000 - 0.00 75,00 1 0 ,000 (1,000) (100.00) L General mooperating 100,0D0 12,561 1256 87.439 90,221 (77.660) (86.08) Vehicle&equip 250,000 86,820 26.65 183,380 48.152 18,468 38.35 Mailing fee - 140 WA (140) - 140 WA L Sampling charges 250,000 69.872 27.95 180,128 51.170 18,702 36,55 Parer sales 400,000 105,471 28.37 294,529 47,426 58,045 122.39 V TOTALJO REVENUES 4,050,000 807,062 19.93 3,242,938 947.039 (139,9M (14.78) 6. Ir L If hd u j J Section 2-Page 6 V J. O. & W. C. Budget Review m Comparisons of Expenses by Department - For The Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 1996-9T 1994-95 1995.96 1996-96 Adopted Year to Date Bodeen% Department and DhIslon AB83al Budget Actual Budget 9M196 Rieared General Managers Deparbnent e Executive Management 1,410,640 783,700 8m.5&I 1.022.400 ni'm 3236% Board Sea9ary 54560 143.600 112,948 1111,640 30128 204916 Management Support - 54,700 28573 - communications 21"N 618,400 467,902 =,M IM1489 IBA2% .s Total 1,887.798 14838.4m tA75,9T7 1,814.780 468.885 2.82% Human Resources,Department Human Reewrcas Administration 1,042.149 299,000 3T1.312 451,790 125"T rl. Education 6 Training - 612,800 507,123 7fs.010 1]8,Q8 17.38% 'y Safely 6 Emergency Rwponee 6112m 651.287 Melt) 145.= 14.BB% Total 1,042149 IA25000 1,SYm 2.213,610 407,026 18,39% Finance Department i.e Rnance Administration 11510,739 I.W. m 1,1141 2 1,fi10.oBo 4s7.462 23.92% Accounting 817,506 1.042.600 a01.B56 Waite 261,906 n34% Pumliming 5 warehousing UAW 7605m mip36 7020311 155.340 2213% Total 2874,Bs5 3.3523m 3.a02,434 3,486030 864,706 24.50% m General Services Administration Genteel Services Adaldnlstm0on 1251,701 286.100 180080 BB5,010 161.657 23.26% Hardl Support - 643250 6591675 5a1,740 118,o46 1966% SoRware Support - W.2w 1,061,433 990380 189,319 19.12% PIaMAutomalion - - - 404,3m 42.314 10.47% Collector,Facilities Ma redline 249,469 34;3m 370,382 328,100 fill 30.55% Plant Facilities Malmanance alai 3261.300 3,M.M 3.410,650 071 25.74% Total 4,618.9111 5,155,2m 5,W.019 11,403,160 1,4M,993 23.1916 r Operations S Maintenance Departinem 08.M Administration l,W,020 286,000 425.6m 1,581,510 =237 21.07% 0&M Scheduling - 41l 471,980 461,300 84891 20.88% era plain No.l Opendi 5,4119.2110 - - B.SBa,390 I,W290I 25.77% Plant No.2 Operations 7,431,460 - - t0,N3,350 ZRili,743 23.51% Mochanicel Maintenance 5,192.610 5.516,6010 4721.67I 4.537.310 1,170,1N am Electrical Maintenance 1,856p01 I.WAM I.881,380 2,142,200 311"1 Ill ae Irslrumentaton Meimenance 2,561.127 zffi tin ;454137 ;1osix 592196 nu% Central Generation 1,932199 1,771,470 Sell 3214% Total 25,ST6.m li'lil ,tin 9.934,720 30,1054950 72965T7 24,23% r Operation Department Operatons Administmton - 1241.7m 1,302424 - -Plant Oriental 22.957,500 194BBo,Bm Total U'llil m 21,183,332 Technical Service Department Technical Senecas AdmIredroton 191,o53 Millet 573687 Mining 124,563 16.30% Fnvimnmedal Management 10,163,150 4,B21Am 3,839.914 3,535m 84e,195 24.01% Emimnmantel Sciencae tab 3241,725 3.581,600 3218.764 3.370,470 718,375 21.31% Source Control 839,%2 m.700 362612 015.840 fill 37.21% Total 14,437.670 10,1%,600 1,994.97 IF.M.1160 1.7110,616 2256% Engineering Department r Engineering Administration 78.220 125.dm @,085 e8,530 26,650 4 06% Design Engineering 281.W 243.8110 281,846 154,480 61,374 41.11M Engineering Planning - St.= 141275 155,380 41,330 28m CaneWclbn ManegemeM ;ftl 361,51,11, 347,114 411.240 72,875 17.T2% Total WMI 781,9110 a72.300 787,830 245,228 X(M Less Joint Operating Revenues (4,849.5151 p,800,0001 (4,190,m4) (4,1150,0001 R07,0821 19.0% Net Joint Operating Expenses 46298.9T6 51,3BO.m0 47,74rM 48,7110,00) 11,717,m 24.06% Section 2- Page 7 1996-97 First Quarter Report Staffing Trends Total Head Count For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 7w ew 665 664 666 673 a80 a. Boo- 56 -t4 50 624 70 r 6 7 Goo - No GOO 596 arlOR3 8'30194 BI30/95 al]0196 VXI% ■Actual ❑Vacant At September 30, 1996, the total head count was 607 employees, or a full time equivalency of 597.25 — Section 2 - Page 8 — CORF Review Capital Improvement Program For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 Plant 1 $5,522,000 51% Construction in Progress $312,000 3% Equipment $388,000 4% •� `.. Special Projects - Plant 2 8 Studies Interplant8 $2,634,000 25% $580,000 Joint Facilities 5% $1.275.000 12% Total Capital Improvement Expenses - $10,086,000 District 2 $2,944,000 29.19% District 3 $3.040,000 30.14% J District 1 $1,015.000 10.07% District 14 _ District 5 $567,000 5385,000 5.52% District 13 District 11 District 7 District 6 3.82% $104,000 $687,000 $908,000 $446,000 1.03% 6.31% 9.00% 4.42% Total Capital Improvement Funding - $10,086,000 Section 3- Page 1 FY 1996-97 First Quarter Report L Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements - Current Year L For the Three Months Ended September 30, 199E 799E-97 199E-97 L 1996-97 Actual Remaining Projected Budget @ 9/30196 Budget Outlay 1 A. Reclamation Plant 1 New and Ongoing Projects: y 2. Primary Treatment a. Primary Treatment 72 MGDFxpansion, P7-37 , f I Compr.Natural Gas Refueling Station, P7-51 - 25.411 (25,411) - L Sludge Piping Mods at Prim Sed Basins 6- 15 - 9,917 (9,917) 9.917 b. Prim Clarifiers 3.4 8 5 Rehab. P7-41 425,000 65,017 359.983 485,017 3.Secondary Treatment — a. Electrification of Pump Drives, P7-36-1 10,000 8.784 1,216 18.784 It.Sec.Treatment Expansion to 80 MGD, P7-36-2 14,500,000 4,883,187 9,616,813 17,883,187 Transfer to Project Below (148,361) - (148,361) - Value Engineering for Sec.Treatment,P7-36.2 148,361 3,744 144.617 10,744 V 5. Electrical Power Systems a. Elect. Facility Modins 8 Safety Upgr. ,Pt-40-1 100,OD0 5,406 94,594 100406 b. 12KV Dlsttlb.Syst.Support Facilities, Pi-47 200,000 7.534 192.466 197:534 aid S. Safety Improvements a. Fire Prot.,Signs and Water Sys Mods.,P1-38-5 1.300.000 110,533 1.189,467 1.510,533 b.Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Syst.,P7-43 426,000 45,942 379,058 465942 c.Seismic Retrofit Structurl Items,P7-44-1.2.3 300,0D0 149,739 150,261 624:739 6' 7.Miscellaneous Projects a. Security 8 Landscaping, Pi-38.1 10,000 11,373 (1,373) 21,373 j It. Misc. Mods. Priority Elements P1-38-2 10.000 72.468 (62.468) 112,468 c. Misc. Modifications to Plant 1,P1-38-4 10,000 34,740 (24,740) 54.740 d. Fac Moddns 8 Safety Upgrades, P7-40-2 800,000 8,551 791.449 728551 I.Chem.8 Wastehauler Facility Mods.P1-46-2,3 900.000 10.055 889,946 570:055 g.Allowance for Planned Small Projects 300,000 69,366 230,634 269,366 h.Allowance for Emergency Repairs/Impr. 400.000 400,000 150,000 Sub-Total-Reclamation Plant l 19,690,OD0 5,621,767 14,168,233 23.213,356 fy B. Plant 2 Now and Ongoing Major Projects: 1. Headworks a. Plant 2 influent Diversion 100.000 - 100,000 - V 2. Primary Treatment b. Primary Clarifier Rehab, P2-48 1,550,000 222,458 1,327,542 1,892,458 3. Secondary Treatment a. Secondary Treatment Expansion, P2.42-2 10,000 80.447 (70,447) 80.447 4. Solids Processing a. Rehab 7 Digesters.P2-39-1.2,3 250,000 39,407 210,593 249,407 d. Rehabilitate Solids Storage Equipment 300.000 - 300,000 45,000 5. Electrical Power Systems a. Elecll Fac Modifns 8 Safety Upgrades , P2-47-1 100,000 2.759 97.241 1D0,759 6. Safety Improvements a. Fac Modifns 8 Safety Upgrades,P247-2 800,000 11,485 788.515 881,485 y It. Seimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Syst., P2-50 400,000 46.385 353,615 556,385 c. Seismic Retrofit,Struct. Items P2-53-2,3,4,5,E 325.000 56,922 268,078 356,922 d. Chemical and Plant Water Modins, P2.55 1.450,000 579.325 870.675 3.579.325 e. Reclaimed Water System Pint.2 20.000 - 20.000 20,000 L f. Fire Prot.,Signs 8 Water Sys Mods, P2-46 1,900,000 612.712 1,287,288 3.612,712 (Continued) N Section 3-Page 2 U CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements - Current Year For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 1996-97 1996-97 - 1996.97 Actual Remaining Projected Budget W30196 Budget Outlay B. Plant 2 New and Ongoing Major Projects(cont.): . - 7. Miscellaneous Projects a. Pdodly Misc.Mod. , P2.43-1 10,000 4,101 5.899 4.101 ad b. Misc. Modifications , P2-43-3 10.000 3,823 6,177 23,823 _ c.Allowance for Emergency Repairs/Impr. 400,000 - 400,000 75,000 d.Allow. for Planned Small Projects 300,000 72,990 227,010 300.000 d, 8. Support Facilities and She Improvements a.Operations Building, P2-23-5-1 15,000 2,886 12,114 11,886 - b. Renovation of Existing Whse, P2.23-6-2R 450,000 12.497 437.503 449.997 c.Maintenance Building , 132-35-3 1,900,000 837,583 1,062.417 4,437,583 Transfer to Project Below (60,681) - (60,581) - Transformer upgrades at Operating Center 60,581 11,354 49.227 11.354 d. Phase II She 8 Security Imp., P2-35-5 260,000 18,770 231.230 250,000 r e.Constr. Mgnt Office, M-044(P2-35-4) 19,000 17,689 1,411 19,000 Sub-Total -Treatment Plant 2 10,559,000 2,633,493 7,925,507 16.957,644 C.Interplard and Joint Facilities 1. Support Facilities and Site Improvements - a. Rehabihationion of OLd Lab to Offices, J-11-1A,2 330,000 49,467 280.533 168.516 Transfer to Project Below (181,329) - (181,329) - Demolhion of Old Lab for Offices, J-11-1 181,329 189 181,140 181,140 -- d.CNG Refueling Station 790,000 - 790,000 815,411 e. Information Technologies Trailer Conplex, Pl-48-1 250,000 200,506 49,494 245,506 I.Open Bay Endoures at Pit 1 warehouse 60,000 - 60.000 60,000 _ 2. Outrall&Booster Pump Stations a.Surge Tower Replacement, J-34-1 825,000 33,401 791,599 783,401 e, 3. Infommation Management Systems a.Computerized Fac. Records and Dwg. Sys, J-25-1 5,000 2,959 2,041 4,959 _ - Transfer to Project Below (16,075) - (16,075) - New Safety Division Offices, J-41-1 16.075 12.279 3,796 12,279 b.Financial Information System (IT) 1.400,000 111,688 1,288,332 1,400,000 c.Network System Integration (IT) 156,000 45,788 110,212 45.788 Transfer to Projects Below (120,662) - (120,662) - ve Network Integration Consulting 20,521 1,188 19,333 20.521 Replace Fuel System Control 60,000 - 60,000 60.000 Network Interface Upgrade 39,110 285 38,825 39.110 O&WGSA Computer Upgrades 1,031 (22) 1,053 1,031 e. Information Cabling Addition (IT) 100,000 - 100.000 100.000 I. Upgrade Phone System (IT) 200,000 - 200,000 200,000 g. Network Hardware Upgrade(IT) 280,000 - 280,000 85,330 Transfer to Pmjects Below (194,670) - (194,670) - Network Hardware Upgrade-Small Hubs 7,620 - 7,620 7.620 Network Hardware Upgrade-Backbone 187,050 - 187,050 187.050 ., h. Replace Security Access System (IT) 180,000 - 180,000 180.000 I. Miscellaneous PLC Hot Standby Upgrades 160,000 - 160,000 160,000 -- (Continued) r -- Section 3-Page 3 FY 1996-97 First Quarter Report L Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements - Current Year V For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 1996-97 1996-97 L 1996-97 Actual Remaining Projected Budget 9130/96 Budget Outlay 1 C. Interplant and Joint Facilities (cont): 4. Plants 1&2 Monitor/Control Sys, J-31-1,2,3,4,5 350.000 653.634 (303.634) 653.634 Transfer to Projects Below (11.312) - (11,312) - SCADA Retrofit Hardware Platform at Pits 1 &2 6,112 6,112 - 8,112 Fiber Optic Data Hwy Upgrade 5,200 5.200 - 5,200 ].4 a. Fiber Optic Inter,J-31-1 150,000 - 150.000 150,000 It. OOBS's Control System,J-31-2 400.000 - 400,000 640.000 1 c. Plant Headworks System,J-31-3 300.000 - 300,000 55.000 d. Secondary Expansion, Plant 2.J31-4 200.000 - 200,000 95,000 e. SCADA/Automation Master Plan&Upgrades,J42 300.000 - 300,000 462.800 5. Electrical Power Systems a. Electl. Power Systems Rehab.Studies J-25-2,3&4 300,000 48.405 251.595 300.000 Yr b. Standby Power Reliability Modgra,J-33-1,2 150,000 30,968 119,032 1,092,342 C. MSP No. 3 at Headworks 2,J-33-2 400,000 - 400.000 384.400 e. Improvementsto Central Generation 180,000 - 180.000 - I Transfer to Projects Below (91,540) - (91.540) - W Piping Insulation Addition 3,352 1.090 2.262 1.090 Steam System Modifn 33,644 8 33,636 8 1 Battery Sys Addn at Central Generation 54,544 2.922 51.622 2.922 4l I.Cable Tray Improvements 50,000 - 50.000 - 7. Miscellaneous Projects a. In-Plant Sampling System Modifn 25,000 - 25.000 - � ' Y Transfer to Project Below (10,946) - (10,948) - Final Sampler System Upgrades 10.946 - 10.946 - b. Allowance for Planned Small Projects (Sch.E) 300,000 61,465 238.535 300000 c. Allowance for Emergency Repairs/Impr. 250.000 - 250.000 120:000 V 8. Biosolids Disposal Projects b. Land Acquisition 1.183 (1,183) 1.183 9. Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 250,000 - 250.000 25,000 l.d Transfer to Projects Below (6,119) - (6,119) - Reclmation Plant No. 1 Water Quality Mgmt.Study - - - - OCSD/OCWDRegional Water Recl. Plant Study 6,119 6,119 6,119 iJ Sub-Total -Interplant&Joint 8,341.000 1,274,814 7,066.186 9,058,472 Sub-Total - Major Projects 38,590.000 9,430,074 29,159,926 49,229,472 M D. Special Projects 1. Master Planning I a.Admin. Support Fac. Q Pit 1, J-38-1 300.000 43,015 256,985 43.015 J b. Ocean Outlall Rehab, J-39 400.000 102.774 297,226 652,774 c. Peak Hydraulic Discharge/Outfall Studies 700,000 - 700,000 - Transfer to Project Below (381.312) - (381,312) - Determination of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, J40= 381.312 381,312 - 1,281.312 d. Financial Planning,J-40-2 200.000 - 200.000 - e. Coll,Trtmnt&Disp Fac. Strategic Study,J-40-3 100,000 2,138 97,862 2.138 i f.CEOA, Public Participation,J404 5,000 3,207 1.793 16,207 (Continued) J Section 3-Page 4 u CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements - Current Year For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 1996.97 1996.97 1996-97 Actual Remaining Projected Budget @ 9130196 Budget Outlay m D.Special Projects(coot) - 2.Technical Service Projects b. Phase I L.I.M.S. Implementation 150,OOD 338 149,662 338 ' c.Misc.Lab Improvements 125,000 - 125.000 Transfer to Project Below (49,200) - (49,200) - rb Retrofitting Lab Fume Hoods 49,200 10.082 39.118 10,082 d. NPDES Permit Support 100,ODO 19.125 80,875 89,125 - e. Emission Modeling Testing 30,000 - 30,000 - d I.Air Quality Database Development 50,000 - 60.000 - g.SulfurMonitodng 80,0DO - 80,000 - h.Central Gen Parameter Monitoring 25,0D0 - 25,000 - a, I. Retrofit of Chemical Scrubbers 50,000 - 50,000 - 3.Operations Department Projects a.00B's Confined Space Study&Mad 25,000 - 25,OD0 - .. b.Energy Studies,Envest 330.000 330,000 - TransfertoProjectBelow (2,748) - (2,748) - Edison Envest Lighting Retrofit 2,748 2.748 430,000 e' c.Turbidity Monitor Regulatory Equip 85,000 - 85,000 - d.Full-Scale Biosolids Reduction 330.000 - 330,000 - e.Misc Optimization Stud ies&Improvements 300.000 - 300.000 - Transfer to Project Below (99,502) - (99,502) - Pulse Pwr Enhance Solids Proc(Part B)Eval 99,502 8,663 90,939 8,563 I.Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 200.000 - 200,000 - g. Pulse-PowerMicrobe Destruction Project 200.000 - 200,000 - h. Headworks Screening Mat. Dewaler.Dev. 150,00o - 150,000 - �' Transfer to Project Below (24.215) - (24.215) - Pulse Pwr Enhancement of Solids Proc(Part A)E• 24.215 6,2613 17,955 6.260 I.Miscellaneous Reliability&Redund.Projects 150.000 - 150.000 - m j. Plant Water Filtreation System 120.000 - 120,000 - - Rehab of Boise Chica State Beach Sewer 580 SUB-TOTAL-SPECIAL PROJECTS 4,205,000 580,142 3,625,438 2,539,814 E. Equipment Items 2.100,000 387,493 1,712,507 2,100,000 d Sub-Total -Joint Works Capital Requirements 44,895,000 10,397,709 34,497,871 53,869,286 - Construction In Progress Completed At 6130196 (311,863) 311,863 ® Total Joint Works Capital Requirements 44,895.000 10,085,846 34.809.734 53,869,286 Section 3-Page 5 FY 1996-97 First Quarter Report Lw Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements -Projected Life u For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 Current Total approved W30196 Year Projected Remaining Project accumulated Projected Coat at Future Budget Cost Cost 6130197 Budget V A.Reclamation, Plant 1 New and Ongoing Projects: 1. Headeorks a.Emergency Sewage Bypass System 1,992,000 - - 1,982,000 b. Heamorks W. 1 Rebuild 14,950,000 - - - 14,950,000 kw c.Headsarks No.2 Increase Capacity 2,600,000 - - - 2,600,000 2 Primary Treatment a. Rim. Treatment 72 MGD Exp., Pt-37 38.450,000 255,689 - 288,BB9 38,181,311 V Transfer to Projects Beim (BT7,574) - - - (877,574) Comps. Natural Gas Refuel Station, P7-51 835,374 32,048 32,048 SD3,328 Slue Piping Mods Prim Sad Bas. 6-15 42,2DD 128 9,917 10,045 32,155 b. Prim Clarifiers 3.4&5 Rehab. Pl-41 1,84.5,000 328,688 485,017 611,703 1,033,297 60 c.72 Wd Primary Treatment, 2OD4&2012 32,500,000 - - - 32,500,000 3.Secondary Treatment a. Setrifica0on of Pump Drives, PI-36-1 1,610,000 1,552,787 18.754 1,571,571 38.429 1 b. Sec.Treatment Exp.to 80 MGD, Pi-36-2 40,600,OOD 9.518,288 17.883.187 27,401,475 13,198,525 L Transfer to Une E Below - -Transfer to to"al Beim (165,000) - - - (165,OOD) Value Engineering for Sec.Trea., P1-35-2 165,000 16,639 10,744 27,383 137,617 y c.40 Mgd Oxygen Act'd Sludge&DAFs 65,453,000 - - - 55,463,000 d.40 Mgd Oxygen Act'd Sludge &DAF. 2017 34.000.000 - - - 34,000,000 4. Solids Processing a. Be8 Presses(4 Units) 14,300,000 - - - 14.300,000 Ir1 b. Solids Storage(4 Bma) 10,140,000 - - - 10,140,000 c.Digesters: 2®110'Diameter 9,100,000 - - - 9,100.000 d. Remove Trickling Pilters 1&3 1.300,000 - - - 1,300,000 V a. Renmve Trickling Pi6ers 2&4,2007 1,300,000 - - - 1,3D0,000 I. 119 It Digesters, 20M&2012 18,200,000 - - - 18,200,000 g.4 Belt Presses, 2004 10,920,000 - 10,920,000 LI 5. Electrical Pmer Systems a.Sect. Fac.Mods&Safety Upgr. ,P140.1 6,328,000 140,66 100.406 240.972 6.087,328 b. 12KV Dial Syst.for Sup. Facilities, P147 4,800,000 157,583 197.534 355.117 4,444,583 c. 12kv Electrical Poser Distributor, 2,450,000 2.450,000 v d. 12 KV Poser Distribution, 2001-2D12 1,099,000 - - - 1,099,0D0 a. Standby Poser Generation, 2005&2015 4,914,000 - - - 4,914,000 G. Safety Improvements a. Fire Prat. &Water Sys Mod, Pt-38.5 2,655,101) 551,347 1,510,533 2,081,880 623,220 ~ b.Sdmic Retrcfd of NomStrud. Sys., Pl43 1,3D0,000 121,441 485,942 587.383 71ZS17 c.Seismic Retrofit Struct. Items, P1-44-1,2,3 1,750,000 974,957 624,739 1,599,696 150,304 7. M iloallanscus Projects ad a.Security&Landscaping, P7-38.1 1,780,000 1,667,674 21,373 1,689,047 90,953 b. Misc. Mods. Priority Elenants P1-38-2 5,290,000 5,319.706 112,468 5,432,174 (142,174) c.Misc.Modifications to Rant 1, P1-384 2,255,000 2.251,685 54.740 2,316,425 (61.425) V d. Fac Modins &Safey upgrades, PI-40-2 1,665.000 335,216 728,551 1,083,769 601.231 e. Facility&Proceaa Mods., P1-40-3 2,100,000 - - - 2,100,000 f. Chem.&Westehauler Facility Mods,P148-2 2,950,000 418,100 570,055 988,155 1,971,845 '. g.Alm.for Planned Small Protects 3,275,0DD 231,223 269,366 500,559 2,T74,411 L h.A Imance for Emergency Repairstimpr. 4,000,000 150.000 150.000 3.850.000 Sub-Toth -Reclamation Plans 1 347,921,100 23,1194,465 23,213,356 47,107.821 300,813,279 V Section 3-Page 6 !r CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements - Projected Life For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 Current Total Approved 6130196 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cost 6/30/97 Budget B.Plant 2 New and Ongoing Major Projects: 1.Headvorks a. Plant 2 influent aversion 2,400,000 - - - 2.400.000 2 Primary Treatment - - m a. Primary Treatment 24 MOD Exp., P2-41 14,306,000 5,416 - 5,416 14,300,584 b. Primary Clarifier Rehab. P248 5,700,000 54ZS08 1,892,458 2,435,286 3,M4,734 o Replace Primary Basins A, B,C,2006 11,700.000 - - 11,700,OOD 3.Secondary Treatrrrertt _ _ a Secondary Treatment Expansion,P242-2 17.610.000 17,670,029 80.447 17,750,476 (140,476) 4.Solids Processing - - a.Rehab 7 Digesters,P2-39-1,2,3 9,920.000 699,419 249,407 948.80 8.971,174 b. Solids Storage: 2 Bins 5,200,000 - - - 5,200,000 c.Additional 105 Foot Digester 5.100.000 - - 5,100.000 d. Rehabilitate Solids Storage Equipment 500,000 - 45.000 45,000 455.000 5. Electrical Poxes Systems a. Electl Fac Modifns 8 Safety Upgr. , P247-1 2,870,000 143,225 10,759 153,964 2,716,016 _ b. Facility 8 Process Mods.,P247-3 2,410,000 - - 2,410,000 c. Standby Power Generation,2005 S 2015 - - - - - m 6. Safety Improvements _ _ a Fac Mod'dns 8 Safety Upgrades.P247-2 2,008,000 354,668 $81,486 1.236,153 771,847 b. Samic Retrofit of Non-Struct.Sys.,P2-50 1,680,000 182,764 556,385 739,139 940,861 c.Seismic Retro.,Items P2-53-2,3,4,5,6 4,076.000 3,383,439 356,922 3,720,361 354,639 - d.Chemical and Plant Water Modifns,P2-55 4,200,000 625,669 3,579,325 4,204,994 (4,994) e.Reclaimed Water System Pint 2 3,335,0DD - 20,000 20,000 3,315,000 f. Fire Prot., Signs 8 Water Sys Modfns,P246 4,535,000 629,918 3,612,712 4,242,630 292,370 7. Wscellaneous Projects a Priority Mist Mod. ,P243-1 5,145,000 5,196,646 4,101 5,200.947 (55.947) b.Net.Modfications,P248-3 2,730,000 2,730.909 23,823 Z,754,732 (24,732) c.Allmance for Emergency Repairstimpr. 4,250,000 - 75,000 75,000 4,175,000 - d.Nim.for Planned Small Projects 3,000.000 140,991 300,000 440,991 2,559,009 8.Support Facilities and Site Improvements -- a. Operations Building, P2-23-51 3,615,000 3,5D5,187 11,886 3,517,073 97,927 b. Renovation of Existing Whse,P2-23432R 485,000 1,642 449,997 451,639 33,361 c. Maintenance Building,P2-35-3 6,097.800 761.213 4,437,563 5.188,796 899.004 Transfer to Project Below (64.544) _ _ _ (64.544) Transformer upgr.at Operating Carder 64,644 3,963 11,364 15,317 49,227 - d. Phase II Site S Security Imp..P2-35-5 2,200,000 191.123 250,000 441,123 1,758,877 e.Constr. Mgmt Office, M-044(P2-354) 529,000 687.876 19,000 706,876 (177.876) Sub-Total -Treatment Plant 2 125,690,800 37.427.095 16.867.644 54,294,739 71,296.051 C. Interplant and Joint Facilities 1. Support Facilities and She Improvements - a Rehab.of OLd Lab to Offices.J-11-1A.2 353.700 47,357 119.656 167,013 186,607 Transfer to Project Below (230,000) - - - (230,ODO) Demolition of Old Lab for Offices,J-11-1 230.000 48.671 230.000 Z78,671 (48,671) b.Demo.or Reuse of Old Control Center 200.000 - - 200,0DD c Demolition of Support Bldg.@PIt2.J-27 215,000 109,504 - 109,504 105.495 d.CNG Refueling Station 840,000 - 815,411 815.411 24,589 e Inform.Techn.Trailer Conplet,P148-1 400.000 155.151 245.506 400,657 (657) I.Open Bay EndWres at Pit 1 warehouse 60,000 - S0,000 60,000 - (Corronued) -- Section 3-Page 7 FY 1996-97 First Quarter Report Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements - Projected Life For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 Approved 6/30196 year Projected Remaining jes Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cost 6130197 Budget C.Interplant and Joint Facilities lcontl 2. Outfall 8 Booster Pump Stations Issl a.Surge Tower Replacement.J-34-1 6.5m.000 804,276 783,401 1,587,677 4,962,323 b.OuBaII Rella.8 Pumping Annex OOBS"C"J.: 31,086.000 - - - 31, 00 085,0 i c.Fxt 8 Rapt 78•to Deep Water w1120"OUBell 111,000.000 - - - 111,000.000 3. Information Management Systems - - a.Comp.Fac. Records and Dwg.Sys.J-25-1 3.930,000 611,195 4,959 616.154 3.313.846 Transfer to Project Below (80,100) - - - (60.100) New Safety Division Offices.J41-1 80.100 64,025 12,279 76,304 3795 b. Financial Information System(IT) 2.025.000 310.899 1,400,000 1,710,899 314:101 V c. Network System Integration(IT) 797.000 183,157 45 789 228,945 558.065 Transfer to Projects Below (162,083) - - (162,083) Network Integration Consulting 42.700 22.179 1,188 23.367 19.333 V Replace Fuel System Control 60.000 - 60,000 60.000 - NemorkInterface Upgrade 49.808 10.698 39,110 49.808 - 08. WGSA Computer Upgrades 9,576 8.544 1,031 9,575 - d.CD-Optical Data Archiving(IT) 75,000 - 75.000 75.000 - L' a.Information Cabling Addition(IT) 100.000 - 100,000 100,000 I. Upgrade Upgrade Phone System (IT) 250,000 - 200.000 200,000 60,000 g.Network Hardware Upgrade(IT) 540.000 - 85.330 85,330 454,670 Transfer to Projects Below (194,670) - - - (194,670) yj Network Hardware Upgrade-Small Hubs 7.620 - 7,620 7,620 - NetwodHardware Upgrade-Backbone 187.050 - 187,050 187.050 - h. Replace Security Access System(IT) 180,000 - 180,000 180.000 i. Miscellaneous PLC Hot Standby Upgrades 160,000 - 160,000 160,000 - V 4. Plante 182 Monaca/Control Sys, J-31-1,2.3.4.f 4,200.DW 4,716.149 653,634 5,369,783 (1,169,753) Transfer to Projects Below (2,249.160) - - - (2,249,160) SCADA Retrord Hardware Platform at Pits 1 8 2.200.000 789,772 6.112 795,884 1,404,116 Fiber Optic Dale Hwy Upgrade 49.160 68,888 5,200 74.088 (24,928) lad a.Fiber Optic Inter,J-31-1 1,000.000 - - - 1,OD0,00D b.OOBS's Control System, J-31-2 950,000 - 640,0D0 640,ODD 310,000 c. Plant 1 Headworks System,J-31-3 850.000 - 55,000 55,000 795,000 d.Secondary Expansion,Plant 2,J-314 500.000 - 96,000 96,000 405,000 L e.SCADA/Auto.Master Plan 8 Upgrades,J42 1.350.000 - 462,800 462,800 887,200 S.Electrical Power Systems - - a.Electl. Pacer Syst Rehab. Studies J-25-2,38 1,330.000 97,531 30.000 127.531 1,202,469 b.Standby Power Reliability Modifns,J-33-1,2 13,9D0,000 667.176 1,092.342 1,779,518 12,120.482 c.MSP No.3 at Headworks 2,J-33.2 1,675.000 384.400 354.400 1,280,600 d.Electrical Power Distribution,12W 2,707,000 - - - 2,707,000 a.Improvements to Central Generaton 680,000 - - - 600,000 V Transfer to Projects Below (102,700) - - (102,780) Boller Chemical Dosing System 2,800 13.935 - 13,936 (11,135) Piping Insulation Addition 4,800 1,448 1,090 2,538 2.262 I ; Steam System Modifn 34,600 955 8 964 33,635 V Battery Sys Addn at Central Generation 60.560 6.010 2.922 8.938 51,622 I. Cable Troy Improvements 2,750,ODO - - - 2,750,000 5. Bushard Interplant Trunk Replacement 26,100,000 - - - - 28,100.000 7. Miscellaneous Pmjecis (rJ a. In-Plant Sampling System Modifn 70,000 - - - 70.000 Transfer to Project Below (30,250) - - - (30,260) Final Sampler System Upgrades 30,260 19.314 - 19.314 10,946 b.Allow.for Planned Small Projects 3.000.000 446.654 311 746,654 2,253,346 L c.Allowance for Emergency Repairs/Impr. 3,220,000 - 120,000 120.000 3.100.000 (Continued) J Section 3-Page 8 L CORF Review Summary of Joint Works Construction Requirements - Projected Life - For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 m Current Total Approved 6130196 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cost 6130197 Budget ® C.Interplant and Joint Facilities IcontJ _ 8. Biosolids Disposal Projects a. Compost Demonstration Plant 9,000.000 - - - 9,000,000 It. land Acquisition 22.550,000 647,082 1,183 548,265 21.901,735 C. Landfill Development Phase l 28,500,000 - - - 28,600,000 _ d.Compost Facility 50,OOO.D00 - - - 50,000,000 e. Bicsolids Disp.Landfill Phase II 2011 15,600,000 - 15,800,00D f.Siosolids Dist.Equip Phase 18 II 2001 11.550,000 - - - 11,550.000 9.Water Reclamation Regional Expansion 76,859,200 - 25.000 25,0W 76,834,200 Transfer to Line E Below Transfer to Projects Beim (680.000) - - - (680,000) Redmaaon Plant No. 1 Water Quality Mgmt S 280,000 1,693 1,693 278.307 OCSD/OCWD Regional Water Red. Plant Stu 400.000 151,472 6,119 157.591 242,409 Sub-Total -lnterplaMBJOiM 437.211.900 10.023.742 8.694.139 18.717,881 418.494.019 m Sub-Total-Major Projects 910.723,S00 71,345,302 48,775,139 120,120,441 790,603,359 D. Special Projects 1. Master Planning o a.Admin.Support Fac. @ Pit 1,J-38-1 2,472,000 93,660 43.015 136,675 2.335.325 b.Ocean Outfall Rehab,J-39 1,225,000 58,186 652,774 710,960 514.040 c. Peak Hydraulic DischargeJOutfall Sludms 1,500.000 - - - 1,500,000 ® Transfer to Project Below (1,151,OD0) - - - (1,151,000) Determination of Peak Hydraulic Disc.,J40 1,151,000 251.799 1,281,312 1,533,111 (382,111) d. Financial Planning,J40-2 470.000 - - - 470,OOD e.Coll,Trani 8 Disp Fee.Strategic Study,14 750,000 - 2,138 2,138 747.862 r f.CEQA,Public Participation,J404 155,ODO - 16,207 16,207 138.793 -- 2.Technical Service Projects a.Central Lab Modirls 641,300 - - - 641,30D r Transfer to Project Below - __ Central Lab Expansion J-17-3 4,224 - 4,224 (4,224) It.Phase I LI.M.S. Implementation 280,OOD 14,385 338 14,723 265,277 C. Misc.Lab lmprovenerms 125,000 - - - 125.000 _ Transfer to Pmlect Below (49,200) - - - (49.200) Retrofitting Lab Fume Hoods 49,200 - 10,082 10,082 39.118 ,m d. NPDES Permit Support 255,000 486,336 89.125 675,481 (320,461) e. Emission Modeling Testing 40,000 - - - 40,0DO f.Air Quality Database Development 60.000 - - - 60.000 ® g. SuBur Monitoring 223.000 - - - 223.000 h.Central Gen Paramder Monitoring 487.000 3.519 - 3.519 483,481 i.Retrofit of Chemical Scrubbers 50,000 - - - 50,000 ,a (Continued) - Section 3- Page 9 FY 1996-97 First Quarter Report L uSummary of Joint Works Construction Requirements - Projected Life For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 Current Total Approved 6130196 Year Projected Remaining Project Accumulated Projected Cost at Future Budget Cost Cast 6130197 Budget V D.Special Projects(cant.) 3.Operations Department Projects " a.OOB's Confined Space Study&Mod 50,000 - - - 50.000 b.Energy Studies,Envest 1,650,000 - - - 1,650,000 Transfer to Project Below (2,748) - - - (2,745) Edison Envest Lighting Retrofit 2,748 - 430,000 430,000 (427,252) c.Turbidity Monitor&Regulatory Equip 85,000 - - - 85,000 d.Full-Scale Bmsolids Reduction 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 e.Mist,Optimization Studies&Improvemema 430,000 - - 430,000 Id Transfer to Project Below (99,502) - - - (99,502) Pulse Pwr Enhan.or Solids Proc(Pan B)E 99,502 - 8.683 8,583 90.939 I I1 f.Scrubber Chemical Feed System Mod. 600,000 - - 600.000 g.Pulss-Power Microbe Destruction Project 1,665,000 - - - 1,655,000 In. 1(eadworks Screening Mel.Dewaler. Dev. 410,000 - - 410,000 Transfer to Project Below (36,520) - - - (36,520) Pulse Pwr Enhance.of Solids Free(Part A) 36,520 12,305 6.200 18,585 17.955 i.Miscellaneous Reliability&Redund. Projects 150,000 - - - 150.000 j.Plant Water Flheolion System 120,000 - - - 120,0W Rehab of Bolas Chica State Beach Sewer 580 Sub-Total-Special Projects 15,383,300 924,414 2,539,814 3,484,8O8 11,919,072 J E. Equipment Items 2,100,000 2,100,000 2,100,000 Sub-Total-Joint Works Capital Req. 928,207,100 72,259,719 53,414,953 125,685,249 802,522,431 LI Consh.In Progress Completed At 6130196 81,716,568 61,404,705 Total Joint Works Capital Req. 928,207,100 153.986,284 53.414.953 207,089,964 502,522,431 u L � I i u Section 3-Page 10 L " Budget Review by District District No. 7 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 Operating Budget Review 1996-97 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Dale REVENUES: Budget Date Budget %Expended Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) 3,056,000 135,048 2,919,952 4.42% w Federal and Stale Construction Giants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 224,000 7,060 216,940 3.15% Other Fees 5.960,000 187,401 5,772,599 3.14% Sale of Capacity Rights 50,000 - 50,000 0.00% Interest&Misc. Receipts 1,746.000 518,782 1,227,218 29.71% Other 0.00% Total Revenues 11,035,000 848,291 1 1186,709 7.69% OUTLAYS: Share of Joim Works Trait. Plant 4,041,000 907,726 3,133,274 22.46% District Trunk Serer Construction 970,000 238,641 731,359 24.60% COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2,316,000 1,049,283 1,266,717 45.31% m Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 4,695,000 1,069,491 3,625,509 22.78% District Operating&Other Expenditures 1,604,000 491,266 1,112,734 30.63% Total Outlays 13,826,000 3,756,407 9,889,593 27.57% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 711196 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130196 7-22 Parallel&Repl. Lemon Heights 2,077,117 14,735 - 2,091,852 7.23.1 College Ave. Pump Stn Rapt Force Mains 20,093 825 - 20,918 7-24 Manhole Access Modifications 15,121 - - 15,121 7.7-1 Man St.PIS Improv. 155,246 24,940 - 180,186 2-37 Miscellaneous Improvements to Pump Statiom 11,440 11 - 11.451 14-1-1 A&B Gisler Ind., 14-1-2 Baker Street - - - - Force Mein Districts 6,7&14 44,168 22 - 44,188 7-14 Abandon 9 PIS,7-14-1&2 858,064 136,570 - 994.634 7-16 Lemon Heights Seger 67,572 - - 57,572 Techite Pipe Replacement 2,663 - - 2,663 7-17 Orange Park Acres Serer Repl. 35,3W - - 35,360 7-1-2 Gisler-Redhlll Trunk Relocation 25,329 61,538 - 86.867 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed W.O. 1,663 1.663 Sub-Total 3,303,834 238,641 3,542,475 Share of Joint Works 6,707,688 9D7,726 (43,894) 7,571,620 Sub-Total 10,011,522 1,146,367 .(43,1194) 11,113.9% COMPLETED PROPERTY,PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 1,549,310 - 1,549.310 Collection Unes and Pump Sims. 38.438,218 - - 38,438,218 Disposal Facilities 10,782 - 10.782 General Plant and Admin. Fact. 97,805 - - 97,805 Equity In Joint Treatment Facil. 61.015,160 (15,476) 43,894 61.043.578 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. 142,327 (10,178) 132,149 Sub-Total 101,253,602 (25,654) 43,894 101,271,842 Total Property, Plant&Equipment&CIP 111.265,124 1,120,713 - 112,385,837 Section 4-Page 7 r 1996-97 First Quarter Report W District No. 11 - Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review Li For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 Operating Budget Review I ' 1996-97 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date L REVENUES: Budget Date Budget %Expended Tax Levy(Bond Funds)Only) 1,000 466 534 46.60% Tax Allocalions/SuWentions(Share of 1%) 2,041,000 91,223 1,949,777 4.47% V Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 224,000 - 224,000 0.OD% Other Fees 3.220,000 (82,228) 3,302.228 -2.65% ,V Sale of Capacity Rights 40,000 - 40,000 0.00% Interest&Misc.Receipts 1,250,000 339,981 910,019 27.20% Other - 0.00% Total Revenues 8.778.000 349,442 6,426,558 6.16% ~ OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant 2.999,000 686,846 2,312,164 22.90% Distnct Trunk Sewer Construction 846.000 307.056 537,944 36.34% V COP/Sond Retirement and Interest Expense 2.182,000 833,092 1,348,908 38.18% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 3,718.000 844.112 2,873,888 22.70% ) District Operating&Other Expenditures 770,000 194,686 575,314 25.28% jr Total Outlays 10.514.000 2865,792 7.648.208 27.26% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 711196 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130196 11-17 Slater PfS Sewage Sys Improv. Q086,728 307,052 - 6,393,780 2-37 Miscellaneous Improvements to Pump Stations 4,385 4 - 4,389 4 Miscellaneous Charge to Closed W.O. 668 668 Sub-Total 6,091,781 307,056 6,398,837 Share of Joint Works 5,074,110 686,1146 (33,213) 5,727,743 Sub-Total 11,165,891 993,902 (33213) 12,126,580 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 146,966 - - 146.986 Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 19,048.602 - - 19,048,602 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities 3.053 - - 3,053 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 30.682 - - 30,682 4 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 46.133.177 (11.710) 33.213 46.154.680 Other Assets at Cost Less Amon. - Sub-Total 65,362,500 (11,710) 33213 65,384,003 V Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 76,528,391 982.192 T7,510.583 L L IW Section 4-Page 8 J Budget Review by District District No. 13 -Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 Operating Budget Review r 1996.97 Year-To- Remaining Year-To-Date REVENUES: Budget Date Budget %Expended Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subventions(Share of 1%) - - - O.DD% Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00% Connection Fees 448,000 - 448,000 0.00% Other Fees 819,000 (7,610) 826.610 -0.93% Sale of Capacity Rights 6,000 - 6,000 0.00% Interest&Misc. Receipts 518,000 141,247 376.753 27.27% Other 0.00% Total Revenues 1,791.00D 133,637 1,657,363 7.46% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works TnnL Plant 462.000 103.884 358,116 22.49% District Trunk Sewer Construction 670,500 - 670,500 0.00% COPIBond Retirement and Interest Expense 28,0D0 9.502 18.498 33.94^k Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 624,000 126,034 395,966 24.43% District Operating&Other Expenditures 23,000 Z913 20,087 12.67% Total Outlays 1,707.500 244.333 1,463.167 14.31% Capital Facilities Budget Review Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 711196 8 Additions Fixed Assets 9130196 Share of Joint Works 76Z 103,894 (5,023) 866,509 Sub-Total 767,648 103,8&4 (5,023) 866,509 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights - - - - Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 2,751,557 - - 2,751,557 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - - General Plant and Admin. Facil. - - - - Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 6.839.993 (1,771) 5,023 6,843,245 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. s Sub-Total 9,591,550 0,T71) 5,023 9,594,802 Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 10,359.198 102.113 10,461.311 Section 4-Page 9 1996-97 First Quarter Report L District No. 14-Operating and Capital Facilities Budget Review L For the Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 Operating Budget Review i I 1996-97 Year-To- Remaining Year-to-Date 4.I REVENUES: Budget Date Budget %Expended Tax Levy(Bond Fund(s)Only) - - - 0.00 Tax Allocations/Subventions(Sham of l%) - - - 0.00% V Federal and State Construction Grants - - - 0.00 IRWD Fees 2,842,000 T77,004 2,064,996 27.34% Other Fees - 670 (670) 0.00% lr Sale of Capacity Rights 40,000 - 40,000 0.00 Interest& Misc. Receipts 345,000 110,548 234,452 32.04% Other 0.00% Total Revenues 3,227,000 888,222 2,338,778 27.52% OUTLAYS: Share of Joint Works Tent. Plant 2,564,000 556,739 2,007,261 21.71 District Trunk Sewer Construction 915,100 48.436 866,664 5.29% L COP/Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 166,000 55,893 110,107 33.67% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,304,000 293,574 1,010,426 22.51% District Operating&Other Expenditures 394,000 38,277 355,723 9.71% Total Outlays 5,343,100 992,979 4,350,181 18.58% LJ Capital Facilities Budget Review I Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance L CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 7/1196 &Additions Fixed Assets 9130196 14-1-1 A&B Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker St. Force Main, Districts6,7& 14 21,444 109 - 21,563 Main St. Pump Station Improvements 7-7-1 98,838 48,348 - 147,186 Main St. Flume Flometer 40 - - 40 Bay Bridge PIS Lighting Improvements 5&14 46 - - 46 Hydrogen Peroxide Trials 5&14 70 - - 70 4W Bay Bridge Platform Addition - (21) - (21) Bitterpoint P/S Fan Upgrade 5&14 631 - - 631 Sub-Total 121,069 48,436 - 169,505 u Share of Joint Works 4,170,276 556,739 (26,922) 4,700,093 Sub-Total 4,291,345 605,175 (26,922) 4,869,598 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT&EQUIP: Land and Property Rights - - - _ Lv Collection Lines and Pump Stns. 25,582,099 - - 25,582,099 Treatment Facilities - - - - Disposal Facilities - - - W General Plant and Admin. Facil. 6.747 - - 6.747 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 36,768,691 (9,492) 26,922 36,776,121 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. -Sub-Total 62,347,537 (9,492) 26.922 62,364,967 L Total Property, Plant& Equipment&CIP 66,638.882 595,683 67,234,565 L` L U Section 4-Page 10 ' I v Self Insurance Review Public Liability Fund Budget Review For The Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 r Percent of Actual Budget Remaining Actual 1988-97 Through Through 199&97 Through Ino. Budget 9ge198 9r"s Budget Worse tpeeroase) 1. Beginning Reserves- 3.366,382 3,074,185 3.315,495 (241,310) Revenues 2. In-lieu Premiums - - - - d 3. Interest&Miscellaneous 250,000 35,356 14.14% 214,644 45,224 (9,868) 4. Allocation to Other Funds 120,000 36,013 83,987 - 36,013 r 5. Total Revenues 370.000 71,369 19.29% 298,631 45,224 26,145 .e Expenses 6. Salaries, Wages and Bene0ts 4,500 - 4,500 - - ,,,, 7. Benefits/Claims 90,000 36,420 39.36% 54,580 (4,405) 39,825 8. Contractual Services 5,000 4,082 81.63% 918 300 3,782 uri 9. Legal Services 160,000 139,623 8726% 20,377 63,699 85,924 10. Professional Services 5,000 433 8.66% 4,567 462 (29) 11. Supplies&Other 500 500 35 (35) ae 12. Sub-Total Expenses 265,000 179,559 216.92% 85,"1 50.091 129,468 13. Excess Lou Policy 120,000 120,000 .. 14. Total Expenses 386,000 179,559 46.64% 205.441 50,091 129,468 r 15. Excess Revenue(Expenses) (15.000) (108,190) 721.28% 93,190 (4,867) (103.323) r 16. Ending Reserves 3.361,382 2,965,995 88.50% 386,387 3.310,628 (344,633) Includes$720.208 long term receivable due from the County of Orange. m em Section 5-Page 1 m 1996-97 First Quarter Report Worker's Compensation Fund Budget Review For The Three Months Ended September 30, 1996 L Percent Actual of Budget Remaining actual t 1 OW97 Through Through 1996-97 Through Increase V Budget 9ng/B6 9130196 Budget 9130/95 (Decrease) 1. Beginning Reserves' 771,110 746,627 648.241 98,386 1 l J Revenues 2. In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 60,577 26.92% 164,423 51.923 8,654 r 3. Interest 8 Miscellaneous 50,000 9.497 18.99% 40,503 9.836 (339) 4. Total Revenues 275.000 70,074 25.48% 204,926 61,759 8,315 y Expenses S. Salaries, Wages and Benefits - - - - 6. Benefits/Claims 160,000 80.672 50.42% 79.328 35,221 45,451 V 7. Contractual Services 30,000 6,250 20.83% 23,750 6,250 (0) B. Legal Services 5,000 6.000 - - hi 9. Professional Services 30,000 6,152 20.51% 23.948 5.340 812 10. Supplies 8 Other 10,000 5 0.05% 9.995 5 11. Sub-Total Expanses 235,000 93.079 91.81% 141,921 46,811 46,268 12. Excess Loss Policy 40,000 40.000 13. Total Expenses 275,000 93.079 33.85% 181,921 46,811 46,268 r 14. Excess Revenue(Expenses) (23.005) 23.005 14.948 (37,953) V V 15. Ending Reserves 771,110 723,622 93.84% 23.005 663,189 60,433 i Includes$151,754 long term receivable due from the County of Orange. Lu I 6d u Section 5- Page 2 d Performance Objectives Executive Management (Division 2150) Executive Management is currently tracking four budgetary Performance Objectives: Treatment Cost in Dollars per Million Gallons Flow($/MG), Completion of Workplan Milestones, Completion of Budgetary Performance Objectives, and Ensuring Agenda Item Approval Upon Initial Submission. As shown in the graph below, we have exceeded each of our performance targets the first quarter of fiscal year 1996/97. Cost per MG is$32/MG below projections. This is predominantly due to flows being 2% higher than projected and expenditures approximately 1% below budget for the first three months of the fiscal year. The Districts had nearly 550 first quarter Workplan milestone tasks that required completion or some work progress. As shown, the vast majority of these milestones were met, exceeding our projected benchmark estimate. Similarly, the budgetary Performance Objectives for each division and department, described in the subsequent pages, were largely achieved. The final Executive Management Division objective was to ensure Agenda Items are completed such that items are approved by sub-committees and the Boards upon Initial staff submission. Ninety-five (95%)percent of items submitted were passed with limited or no revision; only 5%were rejected or continued. 024 Treavre,n coal $per Ma(em Workplan M,bstme A hleam 020 (%7 OAeW ■TV" Pedwn me Otgwtw e20 nchie.errent(%1 $0.0 _. AgendaiWm Appowl- 1st 00.0 $IATaelen�h) 20.0 30.o Al0.0 50.0 0a0 70.o 010 Sao 100.0 Section 6 - Page 1 1996-97 First Quarter Report Board Secretary (Division 2160) The Board Secretary's Office has three Performance Objectives that are tracked: Agenda Package Preparation Tracking of Task On-time Performance, Ensuring Timely Filing of Board Files, and Development of an Agenda Procedures Manual. As shown in the graph, significent improvement is required in the timely submittal of agenda package materials. The Board Secretary's Office prepared a tracking sheet to assist in determining whether target dates for steps in agenda preparation have been met. These targets include drafting of the agenda, agenda approvals,final changes/edits, photocopying and mailing. Numerous issues have been identified that have delayed milestone completion. These include: drafting of the agenda at the department level occurred, in some instances, beyond the target date resulting in other"slips" in milestones; agenda packages mailed one day late due to last minute changes to documentation, photocopier malfunction; etc. Many factors are typically beyond the control of the Board Secretary's Office which strives to maintain flexibility while meeting the various milestones. With time and experience, departments and other agenda preparation participants will submit items to the Board Secretary within deadlines more consistently, thereby improving the Secretary's ability to reach milestone targets. In regard to the other performance objectives, we have exceeded our initial benchmarks. All filing as been accomplished within the 30 day time frame and we have completed the Agenda Procedures Manual three quarters prior to the established due dale. 8% Agentla Package Tmeline iMlesrore ta9e6 Mei - - RW At BmM Doc.m -30 1W% OncWai Dry Wx Turrrrw ❑Target - 80% r—_ 100% A{prda PromEuras Maival Carryler. --- _. 0% 10% a%s BO% m% sit% W% TM eo% s0% t00% �. L � i r Section 6 - Page 2 Performance Objectives Communications (Division 2190) The Communication Division implemented three on-going survey mechanisms to measure customer satisfaction. As sham in the graph, graphics services, photocopying services and visitor(tour/speaker)services exceeded our benchmark estimates defined as a 75% or'above average'satisfaction rating. As shown in the graph below, all three performance objective targets exceed exception reporting standards, resulting in exceptional service ratings. This is predominantly due to our re-focus on customer service, product quality and rapid turnaround time. Our employee satisfaction rating (based on morale, perceived Districts' support of the employee, etc.)did not meet our benchmarks and was significantly lower than hoped. Based on last year's survey responses, we anticipated an average score of 4.0 on a 5.0 scale (80%). It is assumed that lower scores resulted from the significant and on-going change at the Districts. Such change often brings about increased levels of dissatisfaction among many employees. Furthermore, the timing of the survey instrument, which coincided with the beginning of labor negotiations, has likely impacted survey results. Lower morale throughout much of the Districts has largely contributed to the decrease in average survey responses. 6npb,.s.e.r=ern FW1, 65% inlwnenm CvnrunicareC- 43% smslacbm Lapel vivmr Jov/Sp Win 9051 ❑Final Saosfaceon rbEry 75% ❑Targn PnobcoDY Serwca Se Viixi5m 51% ibnng 76% CagicsS cn smdt m 9 An g 75% X 0% 10% any 30% 60% 70M m% IM IM _. Section 6 - Page 3 1�I 1996-97 First Quarter Report GOALS TASK MILESTONES Executive Management Division Complete Behind Not Started L Develop and implement competitiveness plan 6 0 0 Re-engineer O&M organization,procedures and practices 3 0 0 rnl Develop and implement plant automation plan 1 4 0 L I megraw computer system he link users to databases 0 1 0 Restructure Ocean Monitoring Program 1 1 0 Negotiate changes in action discharge monitoring repuiremema 1 1 0 Cooninate wlth SCCWRPto improve regional monitoring efforts 0 2 0 Develop new info.products to communicate compliance performance 1 1 0 � I Complete study and implement firerciel program 3 0 0 Y.I Initiate walarconservetico study 3 0 0 Continue reclamation feasibility efforts with OCWD 3 0 0 Hold quarterly Board workshops fo mvlev progressfaMain gwdance 4 0 0 Li Continue DistrctswideSafety Policy Review Committee 2 0 0 Develop communications,strategies to promote competitiveness plan 1 0 0 Implement connamunicoticas programs to promote strategic plan process 0 1 0 I Evaluate effectiveness of employee communicoticoa programs 1 0 0 u Develop loneness,tadmicaleseialerce program 1 O 0 Estedlsh community,outreach re:compliance performance 1 0 0 I I Implement employee recognition and wollnesa LJ programs 1 0 0 Improve PRIDEpmgrem 2 0 0 Implement ra-training and aoss4+ainirg program 1 1 0 Publish annual training calendar 1 0 0 Y.I Evaluate broad-banding and skill-0ased pay 1 0 0 Implement a pedamence measurement moniloring''productivity,pmgran 0 1 0 Tie management ewtuetiorn to workpan performanm 2 0 0 i• Conduct efficiency studies using i"ouss msources 2 0 0 V Improve CIP Process and project delivery 0 1 0 TOTAL: 42 14 0 Id Board Secretary's Office Develop agenda package preparation timeline 3 0 0 Monitor enough daily time logs filing of monthly agenda items 2 0 0 LJ Develop agenda procedures manual 9 0 0 Finalizafess for agenda Packages delivered to public 2 0 0 Improve mcoNs management Processes 2 0 2 L+ Assist HR staff with Conflict of interest filings 3 0 0 Continue cress-refemrce of easement and grant deed files 1 3 0 TOTAL: 22 3 2 Lei U j Ll Section 6-Page 4 L Performance Objectives .a GOALS TASK MILESTONES ,r Communications Division Complete Behind Not Started Support Strategic Planning process 7 0 0 Prepare communications program for competitiveness plan 2 0 1 y Expand Internal communications programs 10 0 1 Protium highyuelity brochure for Districts"centerpece' 2 0 0 Work with TS to protluea rradne monitoring eaeadlve report 0 0 1 Keep Boards apprised or DlsbicW progress 3 0 0 m Establish outreach program for City OlficialwState Legislators 1 0 0 Strengthen waking relationship with business,community 1 0 1 Implement outreach program to srlimis/unHersitles 1 0 1 m Developsfidellbmry 1 1 0 Lease cola copier 1 2 0 Improve Graphic Users Group program 2 0 0 Improve photocopying and mall man cusromor service 2 0 3 TOTE: 33 3 8 Grand Total: 97 20 10 m a. Section 6- Page 5 1996-97 First Quarter Report Executive Management Department 12T Milestone Tasks t00% - x s 74 90% SM ❑NAS W ■BMM ❑Comgae A 20% — 0%Lit Fzeasive Boartl Cammuniotims MaiaOemaX Secretary's Divivm Divisim Otfim Section 6- Page 6 Performance Objectives Finance Administration (Division 2210) Finance Administration has three active Performance Objectives: Average Rate of Return on Investments, Development of a Risk Management Workplan, and Average Interest Rate Paid on Certificate of Participation (COP) Borrowing. As shown in the graph, objectives were met or exceeded. The average rate of return for the .. Districts' short and long-term investment portfolios for the first quarter was 6.00%. Overall, the fixed income market was unstable, based on mixed economic indicator reports, and fears that the Federal Reserve would increase interest rates. A draft Risk Management Workplan was completed and presented to the Safety and Risk Management Policy Review Committee for review and comment; all milestone objectives were met. The Districts'variable rate debt traded at an average interest rate lower than the benchmark which, in this instance, is beneficial as it reduced the Districts' borrowing costs for this period. 6% Aye %Wl an lmeslmmts ' r 1Y% Risk Mrrlpment WrMgen(x10) — OAaIUY r 111irW L13% Interest PWe on COP Bone ng 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 0.00% 4.00% 5.00% e.00% 1.00% &(x% 9.00% 10.00% —. Section 6 - Page 7 1996-97 First Quarter Report Accounting (Division 2220) The Accounting Division has two Performance Objectives with milestones. Development of a Financial Information System (FIS)and Development of a Finance Policies& Procedures Manual. In addition, one other Performance Objectives, Financial Reporting Within 10 Days, has been established. The Division is on track With development of a comprehensive policies& procedures manual and has completed budget monitoring procedures and training. The development and implementation of a Financial Information System is behind due to the longer than expected contract negotiation and signing process which was completed approximately 5 weeks late. Nevertheless, staff is committed to the implementation of the system by the end of the fiscal year. _ The distribution of monthly financial reports Within 10 Working days of the beginning of the month has only been accomplished for two of the three months Within the first quarter. July's report was not distributed until the 15th of August because of additional Work required to complete the June 30 year-end closing. It is expected, however, that our 90%objective Will be reached by year's end. r_ I N1t Fin n nii Re ns Within 10 Deye r sox yy TO" F,narcial Information System(Fte) MNgM 100% Pd,.,.&Pm W..Manual 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 5096 00% 7M 00% 90% 100% Section 6 - Page 8 Performance Objectives Purchasing & Warehouse (Division 2230) The Purchasing &Warehousing Division has five Performance Objectives: Physical Inventory Accuracy, Supplier Performance Measurement System, Disposal of Obsolete Items, Reduction of New Items to Inventory, and Improved Contract Oversight and Administration. The warehouse is on target for physical inventory accuracy with a 95.97% rating. A supplier hot sheet has been developed (and improvements are on-going)to assist with supplier performance measuring;we targeted a turnaround time 50% better than last fiscal year and have exceeded this benchmark. The graph reflects a bid let for sale of 1,282 obsolete items in October—this represents more than double our annual target for physical disposal of such items. We currently have stocked twenty-three(23) new items this quarter which represents 24%of our annual target. Finally, we are tracking with our contracts oversight and administration having monitored 75% of the non-Public Works agreements during the first quarter. Yeti Phyaicellmentory Accuracy StaeSuppller Tumam and Time 801i (Implmeme,d ixpacted) e0% — 4e% GMW Dis%sal of Obsdete Inuantory ETV" U% Now Stack Memo WaMqusM 7M D tmcta Oars,ht 0% 10% MPb 30% 40% SO% e0% 70% B0% Y0% 100% Section 6-Page 9 l: 1996-97 First Quarter Report u GOALS TASKMILESTONES Finance Administration Complete Behind Not Started L Complelecomract negotiationsand begin FIS implementation 1 1 0 Eland sower connection fee and user fee programs 2 0 0 Revitalize Risk Management Task Foroa 3 0 0 L Improve stairs abiligeslo monitor budgetary performance 2 0 0 Conduct an RFP process for commercial bank 3 0 0 Improve conaact and consultant mangemem skills 2 1 0 Issl Conduct RFP for Brokeraf-Record for PropertyNabllity,Insurance 1 0 0 Earn GFOA,CAFR and MTA awards 2 0 0 TOTAL: 16 2 0 I . 6 Accounting Complete contract negotatlons for FIS 1 0 0 Implement FIS 0 1 0 Develop Districts-widebudget monitoring program 3 0 0 Completefinance Policiesand Procedures manual 1 0 0 Improve monthly accounting dose cycle crew 1 0 0 L Increase level of dMalonlMdetreining 3 0 0 TOTAL 9 1 0 Purchasing 8 Warehouse �. lmplememABC cycle count program 2 0 0 Increasesuppllopedormmramtirgs 2 0 0 Dispose of Dlstads'wsehousa surplus by 20%+ 4 0 0 VI Ensure PurchasingnroNtorscor 1 compliance 0 1 0 Develop Blanket Orders for repetitivewsrahouse Inventory 1 0 0 L TOTAL: 9 1 0 Grand Total: 34 4 0 II V L I � V L 'L II Section 6-Page 10 u Performance Objectives Finance De part ment 38 Milestone Tasks IW% 90% — 80% —' 70% 60°6 o Not Starled W% eeenme Y 9 ❑Complete a0% aa% 20% t0% FbYRlAhnlnislralron Acmunling PIR ft&Warellouse Section 6- Page 11 1996-97 First Quarter Report General Services Administration (Division 2410) General Services Administration has four Performance Objectives: The Re-engineering of Information Technology, The Automation of"C' Headworks at Plant 2, The Installation of an NT Network Throughout the Districts, and a Market Analysis of the Collections System. With the recent hire of a new Information Technology Manager, the reorganization of the IT Division has progressed well; we have met our benchmarks identified in the graph below. Approximately 25%of the Headworks Automation is complete which reached first quarter milestone objectives. We are on schedule for complete implementation of the NT Network by year's end. The market analysis for collections was completed eady, nearly six months ahead of schedule. r EWn IT PHsim- [0% tMmnaMaian Irtpbnn0e0 14X JJt lbltlMpb II�YYIm OAq/ ■Tww M nNaM IrYOm r 100% Wd bons VII Ar*W r 0% 10% a1% JU% 00% 00% 11 70% 00% 00% 10111% r r r r r r Section 6-Page 12 �+ Performance Objectives End User Support (Division 2420) The Division has recently been reorganized to improve customer service. Previously known as Hardware Support, the new End-User Support Division is tracking four budgetary Performance Objectives: Work Order Backlog, Work Order Turnaround Time, Productive Time of Staff, and Implementation of a Hardware (PC and peripheral) Inventory Database. As shown in the graph below, significant strides have been made in some areas while opportunities for improvement exist in others. Our current work order backlog is larger than the benchmark target. This issue will be addressed in the forthcoming quarters. Similarly,turnaround time,which is targeted at 90% of work orders completed in 5 calendar days or less, requires improvement. Conversely, however, our staff productivity is above the benchmark standard set, and a significant improvement over prior quarters. Also, we have completed the Hardware Inventory three quarters ahead of schedule. 74% Bm,klo3 Turnemu,M Time-sow w.o in 5 a% Jays«less — o�aui ■T.rper e1% Pxmeed Pmtuane Time 6 100% Pmtluce WNxsre Inw.Pry M 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% TO% 50% 00% 100% — Section 6 -Page 13 1996-97 First Quarter Report Network, Communications, Programming & Database Support (Division 2430) The Division has recently been reorganized to improve customer service. Previously known as Software Support, the new Division is tracking three budgetary Performance Objectives: Productive Time of Staff, Windows NT Implementation Districts-wide, and Source Control Database Development. As shown in the graph Wow, the Division has exceeded our productive benchmark. Additionally, based on milestone targets, Windows NT installation is on target. Only one milestone of four was met in the source control database development. The staff involved in this effort were redirected by their management to pursue other, higher priodty tasks at the expense of the Source Control milestones. The majority of these tasks will be made up by the end of the second quarter. axwde Tim 1001E wlMwvf M MIe4pMa OPCW (mpbee ■TiOM r ax sw«comd Oahease Mror�Conpbb0 � r ox lox zox amc an sox eox rmt edK tlox laoz k. r r r Section 6 Page 14 — Performance Objectives Collection Facilities Maintenance (Division 2450) The Collections Facilities Maintenance Division is tracking three budgetary Performance Objectives: Implement Time Tracking Process for Trouble Spot Maintenance, Develop Weekly Line Clean Productivity by Crew Type and Use as Benchmark, and Track Wrench Time for Pump Station Maintenance Crews. Implementation of the trouble spot tracking mechanism is progressing well such that first quarter milestones have been met and preliminary data on time required for such tasks is being gathered. As originally scheduled, the Division has completed data gathering during the first quarter for weekly line cleaning production. As shown in the graph below, the weekly footage portrayed for the Hydroflusher and Cable Rig are the new benchmark standards based on quarterly production, and will be used as a "Target"for subsequent line cleaning performance measurement evaluations. These benchmarks will be adjusted accordingly based on new data. Wrench time for Pump Station Maintenance crews is very close to our annual benchmark targets. TmWb spot Tracking RoPd W.0 Inplenenmtlm(%) Weakly Clenirp Produclim In FL-Hyrdrddaler(000) ❑ALL91 8 Ta get We"Clewing Producbon in Ft .Cade ft(r W) y Punp StA.M nni,nnce Cree -0 Wrench n.(%) i 10.0 010 Wo 40.0 00.0 eao feo Section 6- Page 15 1996-97 First Quarter Report Plant Facilities Maintenance (Division 2460) The Plant Facilities Maintenance Division is tracking four budgetary Performance Objectives: Conduct Customer Satisfaction Surveys for Fleet, Landscape and Janitorial Services, Implement a Zone Assignment Program for Division Staff, Ensure a Ratio of 80%/20% Planned/Preventive Maintenance versus Corrective Maintenance, and Track Wrench Time for Fleet Services Mechanics. As shown in the graph below, an outstanding average rating was achieved in the first customer service survey compared to the benchmark target. The areatzone assignment project is underway with full implementation targeted by years end. Plant area maps and building drawings are being developed. The CMMS database will be modified for the resulting areas/zones. Most first quarter project implementation milestones have been completed. Percentage of time spent on maintenance tasks yielded a distribution of 67%/33% PM/CM ratio. The completion of the area assignment project and ongoing development of the database will increase this ratio. Wrench time for Fleet Services is close to our annual benchmark targets. Although comparatively high to most other public sector garages, further improvements are expected as we focus additional efforts on accurate work order record keeping. I Q15C'satisfaction-Fber 93% Services � Zone 0. gr Prgecr 99% I�rpbrteimtim �- PbnnetlM Mwwce COMicletl 9T,6 OkWI _ ■Tar" !bn-Planneb MaiMenanco �% Concocted 2046 61% Nhmdi Tina-Fleet Barites 1 110 0% 10% 2C% 30% 40% 60% 60% TO% 81% 90% 100% r Section 6 - Page 16 r. Performance Objectives GOALS TASK MILESTONES General Services Administration Complete Behind Not Started Maintain collection system regulatory compliance 2 0 0 Assist In development of complian9mstaeective safety,systems 2 0 0 Build stronger working relationships withlnour watershed 2 0 0 Provide employee support and training 2 0 0 1e Support Improvements in management performance 6 1 0 TOTAL: 14 1 0 ,., End-User Support Replace sewdty card access system 2 1 0 Select,install and startup communications server 2 0 0 r Upgrade Plem No.1 PBX system 0 1 0 Install network hardware upgrades 1 0 0 Install IT volcefdata cabling additions 1 0 0 Conduct core ongoing section work 3 2 0 wa TOTAL: 9 4 0 Networking,Communications, Programming Complete Behind Not Started Complete work ord.on target 2 0 0 Phawm Windows NT 7 0 0 Meet programming milestones for source control database 0 0 1 Meet Oracle programming milestones for swore control database 1 1 1 TOTAL: 10 1 2 s Plant Automation Complete work orders on target 3 1 0 Conduct Ocean Outfall Booster Station work 1 0 0 rb Conduct Metre Human/Machine Interface at Plant 1 0 1 0 Develop CRISP report generation program 1 0 0 Conduct Plant No.2 HeedwodB work 0 1 0 Workon PoaarMonioring 1 0 0 Install StraemlineClients-NT 2 0 0 Upgrade PI-Cs 1 0 0 Train staff on fiscal management 0 0 1 r TOTAL: 9 3 1 Facilities Maintenance r Ensure work units am competitive 1 0 0 Maintain regulatory compliance 3 0 0 Develop strategic plan for service area 1 0 0 rb Assist development of compliant/cost-effective safety systems 1 0 0 Build relationships within our watershed 1 0 0 Provide employee support and training 2 0 0 Support Improvements in menagmenl performance 7 0 0 �.e TOTAL: 16 0 0 Grand Total: 58 9 3 Section 6- Page 17 1996-97 First Quarter Report GSA Department 70 Milestone Tasks WA x gOj5 trey so°e ❑NM started SIP.b 18 ■BeNm U ocompere JO°k to 9 9 3096 x04 to% General Servims End lleer SupPorl Netxorki,, Plant A Onaaon Faolilies P4mim5Valion Communications. mium ran. Programming Section 6 - Page 18 Performance Objectives Human Resources (Division 2520) Human Resources Administration has three active Performance Objectives: Number of Recruitment Days for Exempt Positions, Number of Recruitment Days for Non-exempt positions, and ensuring a reasonable statistical distribution for the Performance Management Program. As shown In the graph below, the number of days for exempt recruitment exceeded our target. The Plant Automation Manager and Senior Engineer positions recruited for this quarter are classified as"hard to fill"due to the specialized nature of each position. The extended period of time required to fill these positions did not significantly impact either the division or the department, yet impacted the averages. The third exempt position, Information Technology Manager, was a replacement and filled within 33 days. New recruitment practices for non-exempt positions(e.g. re-assignment of various responsibilities) resulted in a significant reduction in our"time to fill"compared to the objective. During the first quarter, 263 employees were reviewed and 49% fell within the"Meets Expectations" category. This is a good indication that the integrity of the performance management system is achieving appropriate statistical distribution. w a W Repiu .l t Days-Esempt td _ k M R mitmmt nays-Non OActuY E[empt �Taryel tl %"Meets Exp tml ns -- PeO ao eManagement -_ 10 a) so b w eo M -- Section 6-Page 19 1996-97 First Quarter Report Safety & Emergency Response (Division 2530) The Safety and Emergency Response Division has three Performance Objectives with milestone deliverables. the Integrated Emergency Response Plan, the Industrial Hygiene Monitoring Program, and the Hazardous Energy Control Needs Assessment. The Division also has two Performance Objectives with internal standards of measure: Resolve Requests for Service within 5 working days and a total Injury Frequency Rate 45% below industry standard averages. As shown in the graph below, all milestone deliverables and both internal standards were met. Injury frequency rate remains on target, and as predicted is well below Industry averages. Nearly all service requests were resolved within five days, well exceeding our standard. This success is largely attributed _ to two factors. First, the Division has made customer service and customer satisfaction an internal priority which has resulted in rapid turnaround times. Secondly, this is a new performance objective and a historical baseline had not been previously established; therefore, the current target for performance may underestimate our ability to consistently deliver in a timely manner. A..E t Rala BMox IMuatry NHL St.Ma M7G Sr. Repuaelc 5 My TurremuM r HazaNpua Eragy Co1MM 100% Odd Mdmlpnm ■Tup! r IM IM W"l Hyg,ene Mileat r Int%,rWEm Response 100% Mlleatwwa -� 0% 10% 20% 00% 00% SO% 6M ](1°b S0% 90% 100% Section 6- Page 20 Performance Objectives Education & Training (Division 2540) The Education &Training Division has three active Performance Objectives: Develop& Implement an Automated Training Management System, Develop& Implement a Training Cost System, and collect data based on Training Class Evaluations. Two objectives are based on milestone deliverables and 100% of targets have been met. An automated training management system was implemented that can distribute weekly training reports that include no shorn, quarterly training histories, and expenditures by department. These expenditures are integral to the training cost system. We have reviewed all of the first quarter training feedback surveys. Based on our survey mechanism, a 70% score is classified as an "above average"rating for the overall training course. We exceeded this objective, achieving an average approval rating of 81%for all training courses offered _ 100°b Tmmmg management System 90% - 1m°b O 9 T2inrtp Cost System 10lG pTry0 81% Tiammg Class Evaluxims E70%M M 10% a81 30% 80% 80% 70% 80% 90% 100% Section 6 - Page 21 V 1996-97 First Quarter Report u GOALS TASK MILESTONES Human Resources Department Complete Behind Not Started Develop new employee recognition and wellness program 3 0 0 Complete move of HR and Training to the renovated lab building 4 0 0 Develop an intemal performance management strategy, 3 0 1 Update and distribute HR survey and communication results 1 0 0 YI Evaluate and imp emem recommendations of Broedbanding Con. 2 0 1 Develop new employee relations pmgmm 1 0 0 I Revise benefits administration 1 0 0 Ensure fair and consistent application of Disbicts'P&P 3 0 0 Streamline the Distncts'mcosbnent process 4 0 0 Complete l abor negotiations to implement organizabonel goals 3 0 0 TOTAL: 25 0 2 Safety and Ememencv Response w Develop an Integrated Emergency Response Plan 2 0 0 Complete initiation of Industrial Hygiene Mortorirg Program 8 0 0 Conduct needs assessment for hazardous energy control pmosduret 5 0 0 L Generate useful quarterly reports for managers&policy makers 2 0 0 Develop and Implement costeRskdow safely sysW=,P&P 5 0 0 Implemert a comprehensive safety training program for employees 5 0 0 TOTAL: 27 0 0 Yrl Education &Training i Implement comprehensive safety training program for employees 5 0 0 1j Implement Individual Development Plans(IDPs)for employees 4 0 O Implement departmental training programs 2 0 0 ) Implement retraining and cross training programs 2 0 0 V Publish annual training calendar FY 97 2 0 0 Implement centralized bedding and database 7 0 0 r Implement training cost system tracked by department/category, 3 0 0 Develop and implement retrain]rig program to address new skills 5 0 0 TOTAL: 30 0 0 Grand Total: 82 0 2 L U V u to I Section 6 - Page 22 U Performance Objectives Human Resources Department B4 Milestone Tasks IW% 2 90% e0% 70% B0% ❑Not SlaAW 5 % - 72 00 ■Behind 28 ❑Complete 40% . W% 20% 10% - 0% Human Safety and Educauon8 Resources Emergency Traineg �panmmt Response Section 6 - Page 23 1996-97 First Quarter Report _ Operations Administration (Division 3410) Operations 8 Maintenance Administration has four Performance Objectives that include: Reduction of Dry Tons of Ferric Chloride, Number of Compliance Violations, Cost of Biosolids Disposal, and Reduction in O&M Administrative Staffing Levels. Operations Administration staff worked diligently during the first quarter to identify, prioritize and implement process optimization measures and cost reduction goals. Engineers were assigned as project managers to oversee the development of implementation strategies and data tracking mechanisms specific to their respective goals. Reduced ferric chloride consumption is one of the targeted performance objectives. Historically, the plants have used between 8,000 to 8,300 dry tons annually. The FY 96197 annual target is 7,900 tons, with 2,000 dry tons consumed this quarter. Process related upsets due to substandard polymer efficiency in the digesters and the temporary WAS bypass to Plant 2 account for the higher than anticipated dosage. Optimization measures are in place for the remaining quarters to the target is met by year end. No air or effluent violations occurred. Both treatment plants maintained full operations during the August electrical blackout due to the Districts cogeneration facilities. Process optimization measures implemented in digestion and dewatering, in conjunction with increased Advanced Primary Treatment, reduced the quantities of solids in secondary treatment. Lower unit costs were negotiated for both biosolids and residuals disposal. The Districts are in the process of soliciting bids for biosolids hauling and reuse. Our annual cost benchmark is$4.9 million; as shown we are tracking at below this figure. Operations 8 Maintenance Administration staffing is below our annual target. We expected an 8% decrease, to 22 FTE positions, by years end through re engineering; however we have experienced a significant drop in staffing levels from 24 to 17.5 FTEs(27%). This is largely due to inter-District transfers. Some positions will likely go unfilled. m.m Dr,Tons Ferric cNonEs(a1 W) Ur M Canqurce Vidrtims ' oAa ■Trill $t 1e Biwdids Disposal C t $Million 51 ze r FTE's O&M Aaminislrri�51afl r2 0 5 10 15 20 25 1 r Section 6 - Page 24 -- Performance Objectives Operations & Maintenance Support (Division 3420) The Operations& Maintenance Support Division has identified five Performance Objectives for tracking: Annual Sluice Gate Exercise Program, Variable Frequency Drive Survey, Multi-Disciplined Large Projects Coordination, Fine Tuning of Warehouse Stock, and Small Projects Initiation/Facilitation. The Division is coordinating the annual exercising of 91 sluice gates at the plants. We are slightly behind our quarterly target due to discovered damages and requisite repair on some sluice gates. Additionally, we have spent time assisting O&M and engineering on pilot projects. The goal of surveying all of the variable frequency drives (VFDs) by year's end is to determine the manufacturers'average recommended useful life expectancy and utilize this information for potential parts stocking, upgrade, or change-out/replacement. We are currently ahead of schedule on this project. As shown in the graph, by the end of the fiscal year 75% of scheduled projects(proportionally, 19% by first quarter)are to be underway/completed. Currently we are on target with 39% of projects underway/ completed by the first quarter. Fine tuning warehouse stock is to eliminate and consolidate stores items to further reduce the number of parts stocked and free up shelf space. We are slightly behind the target of evaluating 13,000 items by year's end due to increased focus on small projects. Similar to large projects, we are initiating and facilitating small projects with an objective of 75%completion (proportionally, 19% by first quarter) of all projects undertaken. Based on our project logs, we are currently tracking on target as 40% of those projects assigned have been completed the first quarter. 20X Sluice Gate E+ea:ise ail ux 36%Pop vF0 surrey 26% 1 JeX ti Cawdinale large Pralecb GAi I tY,L IN TAW I px Flne Tune Warele uee Stock Up b% Cawtlirale Smell PrOjrKI9 1YR 0% 5% 10% Is% 20% 25% 30% M% COY. Section 6- Page 25 1996-97 First Quarter Report Plant No. 1 Operations (Division 3430) Plant No. 1 Operations has three active budgetary Performance Objectives: Percentage of Total Suspended w Solids(TSS) Removed, Percentage of Biochemical Oxygen Demand(BOD)Removal Efficiency, and Overtime as a Proportion of Time-off. As shown in the graph below, the plant performance numbers(BOD/TSS)are generally on track, yet can be improved. Polymer performance has been questionable at times and chemical system failures this quarter have required manual operations thereby reducing effectiveness. Both areas are being evaluated to further improve performance. Overtime is slightly above target, approaching 29%of leave hours taken. Efforts to reduce overtime continues to be impacted by increased training,committee meetings and lack of plant automation. Reductions in staffing have reduced Flexibility in meeting personal and compensatory leave needs without overtime coverage. T&M %Ms ib� N.NL %WD ibnoea D ncn.i ■T.9M PropoNm oaro,re Ms ra. ffie% � LBdM N9 - r o.o% 10.0% 10.0% 0a0% 40.0% 50.0% W.0% 70.0% no% y r r Section 6- Page 26 Performance Objectives Plant No. 2 Operations (Division 3440) Plant No. 2 Operations has three active budgetary Performance Objectives. Percentage of Total Suspended Solids (TSS)Removed, Percentage of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal Efficiency, and Overtime as a Proportion of Timeoff. As shown in the graph, the effluent TSS and BOD figures for this quarter do show some differences and in the case of BOD, a significant reduction. The Primary Effluent TSS and BOD numbers are a composite of the A.S. influent sampler("A' side of the plant)and the 108" line sampler("B'and "C' sides of the plant). These numbers are flow weighted and combined for a composite primary effluent average. Recently, the 108" BOD averages have been better than anticipated. We are currently evaluating these numbers to determine if in fact we have an especially effective"B" and "C'operational protocol or if this is an artifact of the sampler itself. At this report, this has not been resolved. Current overtime control policy consists of closely monitoring and scheduling staff time off and setting minimum allowable shift staffing levels while safely staffing the Plant No. 2 facility. Overtime percentages change seasonally due to staff's tendency to request additional time off during summer and holidays, and somewhat less time in fall and winter. We have implemented an Operator floater system to allow for shift coverage during leave periods. Additionally, we have been more flexible in moving Senior Plant Operators to fill shift supervisor positions. 7404 %Ms fbnoaJ 740% 620% %BOD Rlnoratl 7k"0 ■T�pl e.m Prgiptim O.erOrte Hs.w. i Vsa�Ks 2L -1;7 00% 10.0% lae% 911e% 40.0% 67.0% 80.0% 74e11 aab% Section 6-Page 27 1996-97 First Quarter Report Mechanical Maintenance (Division 3450) The Mechanical Maintenance Division has two active Performance Objectives: Proportion of Wrench Turning Time and Preventive Maintenance to Corrective Maintenance(PM/CM)Ratios. As shown in the graph below, the percentage of wrench time for mechanics has averaged 59%or approximately 5.4 hours per 9 hours worked. The Maintenance Division has implemented a time card system internal to the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS)during the first quarter. This allows us to track and report upon preventive, predictive, and corective data in man-hours as opposed to number of work orders completed. Based on this new data collection method, the graph shows a 54%to 46% PM/CM ratio— less than our initial target benchmarks due to additional focus on updating the CMMS database with accurate baseline information. Further refinement throughout the year should help us approach the expected ratios by year's end. rrz Wre«n Tvn.,mire tort«me FbinMrerics-� orwr GortplW ■Tier • • P.M.Manbre«e-!M 6t'i �rP� • r 0.0% to.aw M.ax so.o+s .aox so.ox w.ow ro.ovs r • Section 6-Page 28 r Performance Objectives Electrical Maintenance (Division 3460) The Electrical Maintenance Division has three active Performance Objectives: Preventive Maintenance to Corrective Maintenance(PM/CM) Ratios, Proportion of Wrench Turning Time, and Equipment Records Detailing in the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). The Electrical Division has implemented a time card system internal to CMMS during the first quarter. This allows us to track and report upon preventive, predictive, and corrective data in man-hours as opposed to number of work orders completed. Based on this new data collection method, the graph shows a 35%to 65% PM/CM ratio—this is not reflective of the actual goal. Many of the hours which would have been focused on preventive and predictive maintenance were spent detailing the electrical CMMS database. As shown in the graph below, the percentage of wrench time for electrical staff has averaged 51%or approximately 4.6 hours per 9 hours worked. This exceeds our target. Nearly one-fourth of the CMMS electrical database detailing has occurred thus tracking with our end of year performance objective. Cmrecb�e Alalnmrvnce-Its CanpNh Prey nbw IAeinwe nc Cortpbla OACrmI ■Target 01. % wrenu,rvnhp niro 21aK Detail CAMS I i Z 0.0% 10o% 20.0% 30.0% 4om 50.0% 60.0% Me% Section 6 - Page 29 1996-97 First Quarter Report Instrumentation Maintenance (Division 3470) The Instrumentation Maintenance Division has four active Performance Objectives: Preventive Maintenance to Corrective Maintenance(PM/CM)Ratios, Proportion of Wrench Turning Time, Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) Evaluation Program, and Equipment Records Detailing in the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). The Instrumentation Division has implemented a time card system internal to CMMS during the first quarter. This allows us to track and report upon preventive, predictive, and corrective data in man-hours as opposed to number of work orders completed- Based on this new data collection method, the graph shows a 55%to 45% PM/CM ratio—this is short of the anticipated goal. Many of the hours which would have been _ focused on preventive maintenance were directed to cross-training with the Plant Automation Group and preparation for detailing the instrumentation CMMS database. As shovm in the graph below, the percentage of wench time for instrumentation technician staff has averaged 47%or approximately 4.25 hours per 9 hours worked. The database listing all VFD equipment in service at the Districts and pertinent data related to each unit has been compiled. The project is on schedule based on milestone completion. Only 4.4%of the CMMS equipment records detailing has occurred. The project is thus behind schedule but staff have now been assigned to ensure completion of the project as anticipated. LmacE�e Mai�rce-Ma �6% ' � �rPpb 11r Prow hainarence-I i; l61L ('ArrVble Wrercn Tvniig Trte e]% ❑ACE¢I ■Targn 86X vF0 Propran IA Dead CM.15 �.. 7 0.M 10.0% 20.0% 200% 40.0% 800% 80.0% 70.0% NUM 80.0% f00.0% r r Section 6-Page 30 Performance Objectives Central Generation (Division 3490) The Central Generation Facility has four budgetary Performance Objectives: Dollars per Kilowatt Hour at Plant No. 1, Dollars per Kilowatt Hour at Plant No. 2, Therms per Kilowatt Hour, and FERC Efficiency. The Central Generation Division operated satisfactorily for the first quarter of fiscal year. Based on existing record-keeping, reportable data is for the first two months of operation. This is due to the gas and water billing cycles as well as Accounting reporting procedures. Reportable data meets benchmark objectives. Lower costs for the production of power are attributed to the combining of O&M tasks with the Central Generation staff. Thermal efficiency has been reported as the average of both plants. FERC efficiency, a calendar year efficiency requirement, is higher than necessary to allow for current contractor work designed to ultimately lower this number. I ! in osT $pa lNgh.PWt w. 1 $per Mwe Plait M. 2 ❑Pcp®I ®Target 0AW TherinikWT I _ 0.6i FERC EtOciemy(%A W) 0.10 0.W 0.W eW 0.W 0.W Section 6 - Page 31 u 1996-97 First Quarter Report L GOALS TASK MILESTONES i Operations Administration Complete Behind Not Started �y Developand implemeacornpefifiveness plan 2 0 0 Improve managemmd performance accountability 1 0 0 Develop staffing projection for O&M department 1 0 0 V Develop Strategic Plan 2 0 0 Evaluate plant Process and systems to reduce operating costs 1 0 0 Completebanchmarldnge8ons 2 0 0 Work to increase plant reliability,redundancy,and efficiency 1 0 0 Develop procedures to properly allocate costs to oollections/const, O 0 1 Develop dear identification for Air Quality and special projects group 4 O 0 Develop and Prioritize Special Projects and Reseach 2 2 0 J Develop 3 year Special Projects and Research Plan 2 1 0 Ensure cwndiancewith air quality laws and SCAOMDpermit 2 0 0 I Maintain low number of odor complaints 2 0 0 yl TIIIeV Federal Operating Permit 1 3 0 TOTAL: 23 6 1 L Operations&Maintenance Support Develop Goal Statement work plan 2 0 0 Increase DivisioneRectivenass through training 4 0 0 Provide customer services to coordinate projects 5 0 1 Manage Capital and JO budgets 1 0 0 TOTAL: 12 0 1 I L' Plant No.1 and 2 Operations Developand implementptard automation 3 0 0 j Assist Training Divisicnin developingimplementingooss-baining 1 0 0 V Develop understanding of budget to control was 0 2 0 Comultwith Safety to develop lockkag and hard.energy control 1 1 0 i Provide direction for/eil evaluation of employees 0 1 0 L, Unify Operations&Maintenance groups at two plants 1 0 0 Develop and implement competifivenese plan 1 0 0 TOTAL: 7 4 0 Li Mechanical Maintenance Idend"ining needs and implementtraining programs 3 0 0 4 Assist Safe"th hazardous energy control needs assessm ent 2 0 0 Update and standardize CMMS database 1 0 0 Menage division's capital and JO budgets coal effectively 1 0 0 Workplan devolapmentfor fiscal year 1997-98 1 0 0 L TOTAL: 8 0 0 L L L I ! Section 6- Page 32 Li Performance Objectives m GOALS TASK MILESTONES Electrical Maintenance Complete Behind Not Started Assist O&M to reenginaer organization toward total prod.operations 1 0 0 Assist Safety with hazardous energy central needs assessment 1 0 0 ti Identify training needs and implement traintng programs 1 0 0 Implement cross-training with O&M to marsntim efficiency 1 1 0 Implement 12 Kv Basolineprogram 2 0 0 Continue developing electrical CMMS database 4 0 0 r Evaluate work practices to maximize wrench time 3 0 1 - Obtain 2:1 PM to CM miles 2 0 1 Manage olvision'scepital and JO budgets cost effectively 1 0 0 TOTAL: 16 1 2 Instrumentation Maintenance e. Assist O&M to reengineer organization toward total prod.operations; 1 0 0 Assist Safety with hazardous energy control needs assessment 1 0 0 Identify training needs and implement training programs 1 0 0 implement cross-training with O&M M maximim efficiency 1 1 0 Develop VFD evaluation program to determine replacement needs 1 0 0 - Contirnedeveloping instrumentation CMMS database 3 0 0 .y Evaluate work practices to memorize wrench time 3 0 1 Obtain 2:1 PM to CM ratios 2 0 1 Menage division's capital and JO budgets cost effectively 1 0 0 TOTAL: 14 1 2 . - Central Generation Reengineer O&M at CenOen l and CenOen 2 3 0 0 Develop Plant Automation Plan O 0 1 Maintain safe work place 3 0 0 Maintain Compliance 3 0 0 .,. Implement departmental training program 1 1 0 Defiredivision staffing needs for 5-year plan 1 0 1 TOTAL: 11 1 2 Grand Total: 91 13 6 v `° Section 6- Page 33 1996.97 First Quarter Report O&M Depahment 112 Milestone Tasks tOD% 1 2 2 2 !D% �% ❑Not Sunae ■Behind tE Ocompe�e 40% 1• 1t T _ m% A _ k E2 oe Ogc a0 — i r r r r ,r r r Section 6 - Page 34 Performance Objectives Technical Services (Division 3510) Technical Services Administration has three budgetary Performance Objectives: Ensure 85%+ of Division Performance Objectives are Achieved, Improve Inter-departmental Communications for Projects with Technical Services in Lead Role, and Ensure Prompt Annual Reviews for Staff. As shown in the graph, we exceeded our expectations related to the Divisions' individual performance objectives, with ten of eleven division benchmarks tracking on target. Of the five major inter-departmental projects with Technical Services in a lead role, four have been identified as improved through enhanced communications. Some annual/semi-annual reviews have slipped past the ten-day review threshold, thus improvement is needed in this performance objective. 01% Mach quiti.n i PBrlmmBnee CEjecliws I 00% Inp.o Prq tCormuniceeoro CA W i G Target Sd0 Feirrxs 10 dI/ Turrnr.0 0% 10% 20% 3M 40% 00% 80% 70% W% M 100% Section 6-Page 35 1996-97 First Quarter Report Environmental Compliance & Monitoring (Division 3550) The Environmental Compliance& Monitoring Division has four Performance Objectives that are tracked. These include: Percentage of Non-Compliance Incidents Resulting from ECMD Lack of Response, Meeting Regulatory Deadlines for Submittal, Prioritize& Disseminate Regulatory Material in 2-day Turnaround, and Review and Monitor Biosolids Processing/Handling. During the first quarter, no non-compliance incidents occurred resulting from lack of communication. Ninety-one (91) ECMD notifications occurred to ensure Districts' compliance. The Division met all of its regulatory deadlines including such responsibilities as monthly sewage spill reports, ocean monitoring field sampling, monthly biosolids report, etc. One-hundred percent(100%)of high priority legislative/regulatory actions were disseminated within two days. Finally, all biosolids consultation and advocacy occurred within the stipulated 5-day turnaround time. /ate %cl Noncon alai cite due to ECHO Meet Regulatory ntllinas 100% oxer • ■T�W le9isaliue Pl ulalOy Material-2 100% day Turnaround Bo ids RewewGoreuleddn.9 d00% dry TurnarcuM r 0% 10% 2096 00% d0% 90% e0% ION, M 90% 10eX r Section 6-Page 36 Performance Objectives Environmental Sciences Laboratory (Division 3580) The Environmental Sciences Laboratory is currently tracking three budgetary Performance Objectives: Develop Laboratory Productivity Enhancement Programs and Meet Milestones, Maintain Laboratory Sampling Workload Within Defined Parameters, and Implementation of a Laboratory Information System (LIMS). Programs to enhance lab productivity are currently focused in identifying task processes and opportunities for improvement; developing customer defined quality standards; and implementing a process for monitoring lab quality. Of the milestones identified, four of eleven have been completed the first quarter. The goal of sampling is to maintain an analysis load within 10% of that projected in the budget. The lab performed 2% more sample analyses than was originally projected, slightly exceeding our benchmark but within the established range of 90% -110%of estimated samples taken. Due to reporting processes, the database for this quarter represents one month of sampling. Progress on LIMS has progressed such that 100% of all first quarter milestones have been completed. The project is on schedule for 75% implementation by the end of the fiscal year. r asx , IabareNry ProducOury — INbabres 1 10M ' l Wrabry Sa Hng Wald oftwl 100% MTsw 100% UMS I,ry6�ren6Eon MiMbrcs 0% 2VA 4096 &eA r0% 100% 120% Section 6 - Page 37 1996-97 First Quarter Report Source Control (Division 3590) The Source Control Division has four budgetary Performance Objectives: Source Control Inspector Field Productivity, Enforcement Follow-up Within 30 Days, Permit Issuance/Renewal, and Development of Automated Permit Program and Assistance Center. The overall performance of the Source Control activities relative to the budget performance objectives is on target. The field inspection productivity estimate at 2.25 monitoring events per employee/day nears our target of 2.5 events per day. The enforcement follow-up and permit issuance/renewal is 100%on target. Automated permit and assistance center milestones indicate that 25% of the work is completed during the first quarter of 1996-97. Field InygcDmN a, Wy(25 SOIL _ EMo ce nt Fdb up Whim 3) mays 1 — � ❑Pceal 0 T.rW Permt iaeuarcNRerwwl P.b Evra 7 A�WrrriYrA 2VA c�AWMr r 0% 10% WK 3016 /01A 50% WK 70% rp% W% 111110116 br r r r r i Section 6 - Page 38 ® Performance Objectives m GOALS TASK MILESTONES ,. Environmental Compliance 8 Monitoring Complete Behind Not Started Finalizesbuchued ECMDreorgammtion 4 0 0 Reswdure Oman monitoring program 3 1 0 m Negotiate monitoring charges in ocean discharge pennh 3 0 0 Coordinate SCCWRPtoimpavaregimalmmftaingeHoda 4 0 0 Develop new information products to communicate compliance 7 0 0 Improve tear cork and mmmunimtirnrswithin ECMD 3 0 0 Develop dear identification for division 3 0 0 Coordinate Districts participation in Orange County Fair 3 0 0 Define and support compliance regulatory activities 5 0 0 Regulatory and legisletivetrecldng 7 0 0 Provide quality,control for compliance with CSOOC rag.requirement: 7 0 0 Provide tedmical support for the Districts'biosdids handling 4 0 0 ® Maintain Districts scientific and technical epedise 2 0 0 TOTAL: 55 1 0 Environmental Sciences laboratory Monhor activities in support of general technical programs 1 0 0 Develop systems/processes for monhorl ng lab quality 4 0 0 m Implement Laboratory information System to75%functionally 2 0 0 Assist ECMD in optimizing productivity,in Ocean Monitoring program 2 0 0 Support the District-wide Safety Policy 3 0 0 TOTAL: 12 0 0 V' Source Control Develop a technical assistance program for businesses 2 0 0 ® Develop marketable,automated perut and moutoring program 2 0 0 Ensure 90%+SignificamlrMustiial Users eon in Only.Compliance 4 1 0 Ensure impehon staff conduct ave.2.5 deity monitoring events 4 1 0 Reum1W%Discharge Permits prior to epiration 5 0 0 Develop tedmically based local limits 2 0 0 -- Achlevecompetitive practices 0 1 0 TOTAL: 19 3 0 Grand Total: 86 4 0 s. tie Section 6 - Page 39 1996-97 First Quarter Report Technical Services Department 90 Milestone Tasks 100% 90% ❑Not Starteel 1] ■Behind m CanPb e 19 40% 20% Ervironmeolal Environmental Source Control complonoe& Sciences Monitor, Laboratory Section 6 - Page 40 Performance Objectives Engineering Administration (Division 3710) The Engineering Administration has two Performance Objectives that are tracked: Management of the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF)and Management of the Department Budget. Of the total S44.89 million budgeted for CORF in fiscal year 96-97, $10.09 million (22.5%)has been expended the first quarter; this tracks well with our annual target of 80%* of the CORF budget spent by year's end. Similarly, the Engineering Department's budget is on target with expenditures representing 24.1% of the annual budgeted for all engineering divisions. usX Manage CORF Budge oAU ■TYge N.1X Manage anmeM Budge MCA ".M ".0% 21.s% N.0% am N.0% mm Section 6-Page 41 1996-97 First Quarter Report Design Engineering (Division 3720) The Design Engineering Division has three Performance Objectives: The return of Construction Submittals by Due Date, the Bid of Construction Projects based on CIP Schedule, and the Implementation of Design Project Tracking Mechanisms by the first quarter. The entire backlog of construction submittals has been cleared and all submittals are now being processed within the allotted time frame. All construction projects were bid at the approved bid dates as set by the Board of Directors. Project management software, SureTrak and Primavera, has been purchased, staff has been given training on the use of the software, and all the active capital project schedules are loaded into the software such that full tracking can begin the 2nd Quarter. All first quarter implementation milestones were achieved. toox Sui nml Reim w are Dale eax r taow one u cmvunim aift m scn.nN �Toort A taox ar�Trx.ro _ noi.n.udm � ox tax mx sox 41o+c sow saw rax row sox tmx .. r r Section 6 - Page 42 Performance Objectives Engineering Planning (Division 3730) The Strategic Plan will not make the schedule projected since the Board of Directors elected not to proceed in the manner originally proposed; as a result, some milestones for the first quarter have not been met. New schedules are being developed and a revised Plan implementation proposal is underway that will soon be presented to Executive Management and the Boards. As indicated in a prior chart, CORF expenditures are on schedule. All environmental correspondence has been responded to within five(5)working days or less. Water Reclamation Plan development is in progress; however, new opportunities and questions are being reviewed, thus milestone deliverables have changed on no significant"official"progress accomplished. SIMI"c Plan MIWSI a 2L&% CORE Mild M "a w OA� 07ryM 1011% EMimm Tu =nW-5 dey, WbrbeWmlian PMn 10% DrAb M 0% 10% ane 3046 40% a0% am 7M 90% 90% 1W% L - Section 6 - Page 43 1996-97 First Quarter Report Construction Management (Division 3790) The Construction Management Division has four budgetary Performance Objectives: Change Orders no Greater Than 5% of Original Contract, Achievement of Beneficial Occupancy, and Conduct Quality Control Inspections to Ensure Minimum Correctable Deficiencies. Our change orders are currently on target. Two of nine contracts _ which were delayed beyond 90 days for beneficial occupancy were the result of an accident. These two jobs were just accepted as completed during this reporting quarter. The Quality Control inspection checklist was finalized at the end of the first quarter as opposed to completing the form design earlier this fiscal year. Consequently, no formal quarterly inspections were performed this quarter and thus no reporting data is available. Changa Cr Maximum-5% 4AM Contract yX 0X Banafinal Occupancy 2a0 Days i ❑Actual ■Target Via 6{X Beneficial Occupancy 90 Days Quality contmi<10%ota ies 47 0% 10% 20% J A 4g116 M fi0°.4 r Section 6 - Page 44 Performance Objectives GOALS TASK MILESTONES Engineering Administration Complete Behind Not Started ` Develop and implement competitiveness plan 1 0 0 Develop and implement plant automation plan 1 0 2 Improve CIP process and project delivery 1 0 0 TOTAL: 3 0 2 Design Engineering Improve compaativanessby streamliningdesignfunctions 2 0 0 Produce realistic 5-year division projecf/sW projections 1 0 0 Improve smell projects design/implemematicn 2 1 0 �..i Implement individual training programs for all staff 2 0 0 Implement retraining and goss4ralnl rig programs 2 0 0 Improve CIP process and project delivery 2 0 0 TOTAL: 11 1 0 Engineering Planning Achieve 90%+milestones for Strategic Plan development 4 0 0 " Retain Engineering library and as-builts for security and access ease 1 0 0 TOTAL: 5 0 0 m Construction Management Enhance communications/Feedback within divislaNdepemnent 2 0 0 Hold quarterly safety coordination meetings 3 0 0 w Improve technical skills/competencythrough training 1 0 0 Developrimplementcost reduction methotls lerjoim open.budget 0 1 0 Update onrelmctlon polidesand procedures manuals 2 0 0 r Evaluate staling needs vs.workload 2 0 0 Enhance design feedback for construction pmjeds 2 0 0 TOTAL: 12 1 0 Grand Total: 31 2 2 m w. ,y Section 6- Page 45 1996-97 First Quarter Report Engineering Department 76 MlleebmTnke go% Bo% 2 7 2g% t ❑Nal Star ■Behind 11 S� ❑ComGWe a0% 06 g — 2M 10�b A g°b Ee ineenng AGminisrrarion Design Engineering Eipirm MPW Mre CaWr whbrrop� r r r r. r Section 6- Page 46 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California (714) 962-2411 mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 9272 8-81 2 7 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 CSDOC 913DI96 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS `4 Name of Paper Secllon page Dale Subject THE SEOWW'ER SQMM At the same time, technicians By the time the strike-team along walls, sloppy waste-han from the Orange County Sanita- Searching out sewer dumpers members moved in on the busi- sling in a back lot that might sig lion Districts open a manhole has become the hottest trend in ness,they had already developed no trouble inside. NFORCEMENT: EHVi- cover about half a block away environmental enforcement. a detailed case against it: timed 'Sometimes we pick h a routine h tar inmental cos combat and draw from the depths a "People are a lot more intelli- and dated computer readouts of K nn ngs sets aid d as he drove arouna p drum-shaped device that resem- gent,more advanced in how they all the chemicals, in parts per Ki Anaheim industrial area. Bar se in illegal disposal bles an industrial vacuum clean- dump this waste," said Deputy million, that had allegedly District Attorne Valerie Cris- more often, the tip-off comes bl i chemicals down er. Y Bowed downstream from the phone. The device, an automatic wold of the office's environmen- business over the previous ,range County sewers. chemical sampler attached to a tal-protection unit."We see them month. Catching sewer dumpers is r computer, shows on its electron- going underground,getting more One of those chemicals was far tricky business, however. If ni i PAT eRENNAN is readout That a huge spike in sophisticated." above federal and slate limits for one is watching,dumping poison .e Orange County Register acid levels Bowed past its sensor The array of tools that enforce- sewer dumping. Acidic copper ous chemicals down the drain t: ment agencies have at their fin- an anonymous way to gel rid o n a dim, hazy morn- foal that morning. waste rocketed to more Than Within two hours, ough tga- MAgertips900 also has grown. The SIG- them. They mix into the larger ing, Anaheim jolts tors have obtained enough evi- R2 2, MAX looks like Ilse robot morns parts per million each Road of waste water that make. awake. Thousands of Rasa, main beau charm, but it morning shout d a.m. The r mil-to charge Pacific Image its way in slow-moving under showers flaw, thou- Co with 74 felony counts of ille- has a certain beauty to l strike al cutoff is three parts per mil- ground rivers to the Orange sands of toilets flush of the environmental strike lion. Such acid levels can burn id waste water sluices through gaily dumping z,toxic waste. team. human flesh. County Sanitation Huntington Alex Godmez, whose father - "That's the highest copper treatment plants in Valley. iIn an u r miles rks le induer striales. owns the firm, said the accuse- "The computer can be pro- g pP Reach and Fountain V ho In an unremarkable industrial grammes virtually any way we history of the ever found in the lion is false. ' ncn convicted owners who have Dar- irk lucked into the south side of ••We're a very responsible want;' said Kelly Christensen, history of the agency,"said Dar- been convicted of sewer dumping wn,another morning ritual be- company dealing with a lot of supervisor of inspectors at the tell Ennis of the sanitation dis-icts. were usually adept enough to aste ahe cidiecaustic enal ough to quality oaknow ournies reputations Go- oac s. "Werange can collect samples Sanitation Dis- IrThe raid ended months of un- perk everyth heir ing a that, an pa. irn the flesh off fingers. Down over a period of days or for just, dercover work by district attor- Y g appeared nor dinez said. "We would never do P Y 4 mat; the amount of waste sent e drain and into the sewer goes anything like that." say, a4 hours. This is an indis- nay investigator. quk-huKip detects a out for legal disposal matched e bluisb-green liquid, as it has True or false,the sewer-dump- pensable piece of equipment." quiet, quick-humored detective ery day for weeks. ing accusation is one of the most The team is composed of 30 with a fondness for backyard as- she amount of material coming But this time,Orange County's serious that the District Attor- agencies.On this day,it included tronomy and cowboy boots. Kin- an. rvironmental cops are ready.A ney's Office has ever made. But not only the sanitation districts Rings has his own lingo—crime- Only tedious surveillance, fre. travan of cars,trucks and vans it is far from unique. and District Attorney's Office, nals are "desperadoes" and sus- quint "below-deck" sampling irrounds a small circuit-board In recent years,the number of but the Orange County Health pect businesses are "targets"— and a trained eye can spot the anufacturer suspected ofosecu- Care Agency and Anaheim police and uses a magnifying glass and signs of illegal dumping. Angry such cases has grown. ore buss- emplo ees ar dis imptng the waste. [ors cite two reasons: More bust- and fire departments. disguises in the course of his in. Y trended neigh- ls andiwears, armed with Pis- ness owners are using the sewers The raid on the circuit-board vestigations. burs often tip off the District At- Is and wearing District Attar- to dump waste that would be ex- maker came after nearly two Instead of searching for drops torney's Office to possible viola- •y's Office jackets, present to dispose of legally,and months of dead-of-night surveil- of blood or telltale hairs,howev. Lions, but that is only the begin- pensiveeir search warrant to sur- law-enforcement officials are us- lance and the covert lowering er,Kinnings seeks[lie signatures rang- ised employees. ing new, high-tech instruments and raising of SIGMA 900. of illegal waste disposal: suspi- ,,.... ... 11 HUNTING HAZARDOUS-WASTE DUMPERS Process of elimination -Bracketing-is one strategy i Orange County Sanitation District investigators use samplers to test sewage for pH levels, that uses samplers near which determines amount of acids or alkalis.High acid levels generate low pH.High alkali a business suspected r levels generate high pH.High levels of alkali or acid are toxic and can burn skin or corrode of dumping - metalandconcrete,so investigators look for extremely low or high pH levels. toxic waste. Chemical sampler ©oases-vamfer Closing in SamplerA O>t Sgla� IIIa1 Programmed to I unitlnformation placed up di gred ►If a business is sus take sewage downloaded; parted of dumping stream of , to samplesatspecific downloaded' toxic waste,invest- businessks t combined later g4tlesof intervals PH nd at by igalor hegmmanhole, piing specific pH levels � with<heminl by.manhole sampling pal (mm anatysis of sample ofsewage, otherrggaf r:. ^,.r'�. '20lb 4 Com en tr 0 Ism ►mp at wine time businesses 4errrpler9 hay Records time. dump en in time of _ 3 Sdate,imp pH level of day,often in morning stream down a esr 4yy? rI sample and bottle stream ofrti" J � inwhich it'srtacd s!' petled torski ►Each business has ness to take If Sampler A does a ©Distributor. permit on Ile with Y r"•'Othe!" - samples of ias notshowabnormal k Pourssxmple in to county detailing .s F bus uteskes:.. diuharge. 'pH h'reH but one of 24 plastic chemicals .. -;n Satlryly Bdoes, battles it uses �.?t investigatolf Llp.�. determine illegal ©Sample probe: v _ �� - dumper. Sucks water Sam ple Into unit when triggered by cum PIS tic puter or PH Probe Sampler ` ) _ Sous un:Orange Coty hisles V r s Sanitation Dmmas p probe: Chemical e: ► emica signature 0H Graphics reporting: Measureas i level tracked to specific Manholes be CHRIS BOUCL r—{ fof lws by asit busked to spxific Manholes _ � I slows by businesses. t 1 r MARY ZISIs/She Orange County Register But the biggest price lur sewer dumping is paid by businesses. The motive for dumping waste in When Kennings picks up a po- the sewer is usually financial, etttially hot case,he begins what Kennings said. if company presi- •rienaddsupto weeks ofsurveiI- dents or owners don't have to pay :mce. A quick site inspection. to dispose of waste, they can art on a weekend morning, for" make more money printing cir- Y coat boards. ,,,stance, to snap pictures of the "The profits could create a I• ly while no one is around. new Corvette or Mercedes-Benz alea will go over the photos with far the president or vice prest- lais magnifying glass for eve- dent by theendof the Year,"Kin - dlence of illegal dumping. nings said. Or maybe a visit to the comps- That means undercutting the ny during business hours — in competing firm down the street. quickisgl of course o to catch s And that means the desperadoes perform glimpse of how workers get rich at the expense of law- perform their tasks. Kennings abiding citizens. ems even slipped into the crow) :around a lunch wagon near a sus- pect company's property, chat- ling up employees and getting tidbits that he can later use to build his case. If he finds nothing wrong that the business is complying a .rith regulations —he fades into _ she twilight. ,d "The businesses never know I + was there," Kennings said. But if he suspects that a buss- w uess is dumping illegally, it _,. won't be long before the enforce- ment squad rolls in. The county prosecutes sewer- yc - ,. j•E..7+a4� dumping cases for various rea- sons. But unlike other environ-. mental crimes, sewer dumping. ',,'"c'= `• usually does not involve a direct .'i " �• -`:i„' threat to the public. The threat,instead, is to sewer workers, who can suffer injury nr death if they breathe poison- DOWN IT uus vapors. GOES: Darrell There also is a financial threat Ennis, an ,F r +' rs • i'f•u-:. k s to the sanitation districts' waste assistant source- water treatment plant,which re- control TESTING,- moves and recycles human inspector for the TESTING: A waste for fertilizer. Contamina Orange County s-•�' + �' county Lion of the waste with excessive Sanitation `- �. . - sanitation heavy metals, such as copper, Districts, lower employee means it cannot be recycled; the the Isco device smeasures the p districts must pay to have the into a drainpipe •4'� .� of samples waste hauled away. so it can analyze i collected from the levels of sewer drain by acids and bases ,e� t tI using a device there al'y'a :W (Ad ralled the hers IT RTT 3 - i - :t DRAIN SLEUTH: .` Kip Kinnings, investigator for the District •'i�.'j Attorney's Office,examines a storm drain in south county last month. Kinnings — who often wears disguises during the course of his investigations — looks for the signatures of illegal waste disposal: supicious etchings in concrete drainage channels, discoloration along walls and sloppy waste- handling in a company's back lot that might . signal trouble inside. Photos by DANIEL A. ANDERSONflhe Orange County Register L.A. Ci ty Council Will Go to Court Oyer Prop : 219 , , ■!Government: Measure . - mark property-tax limitation;that ' voters approved in 1978 u gives voters 1nuc'h gFeater "I don't think we should be SAbStmce Abuse control Ove[municipal "Pending any taxpayer dollars" to r thwart the wishes of the voters lII the WOLkpiSCC levies,Major loss of who roundly approved Proposition. + 218,Bernson said. x .:.' .. revenue 18 j1rMllCteli. Joel Fos,_head of the organize- aRe Inquiry Leads to FSrings at t.,. F ' A' Lim-that. sponsored Proposition O.C.Sewage Plants,"Nov.1.' : . By JEAN MERE " t'.' 218, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers It seems rather appropriate that SIMas rrsry watraanp 'Z? : ,;Assn.,said he was not surprised by we discover a group of druggies ?,'''fie hoe Angeles City Council 31 on -the own tote but nonetheless operating in Orange County's sew-, , P4The narrowly decided m sue fomndit"outrageous" . age plants. ." over Proposition 2de the r to mently %" -Thew first response is to try to .,ALLENC HOWLETT ktek send m the [ace of their passed atsts..imitiRtive that gave _ . ___._Ftillerlon ;.constituents,"defended Fro the - ooters much greater say over local He defended the assessments ■The fact that a.number ut era- texandfee measures. ,tw ployees at a sewage treatment :Although several Iocel'govern-.:.Provision„saying his organization plant ere drug users is not surpris- went groups have talked about "carefully built (the meesureJ on ing. The Problem of substance going to court over the measure— previous law." *,.i^ •rr, +It abuse among workers seems to be approved by California voters Up to now,many types of asess- pervasive. ;565+%-43.57 on Nov. 5—Los An- ments could be levied by mum;pk When an employer, contracts 'geles could well he the fast to lawmakers users a majonty,of the with an employee to provide a 'actually do so, initiative-watchers affectedpropertyowgmsprometed... service, the employer expects the I+eatd Friday. . . . ' A spokeswoman for the league employee to show up.for .work ,,!"'Proposition 218 targets all mu- of California Cities said the orgard drug-and alcohol-free. "j',';"i idcipal levies—general.taxes such zation has been working with a The employer shoWd �not be j 'as those imposed on hotel rooms; -team otvolunteer city,attorneys to expected to.pry someone who,by t fees for specific services such ee °:�through Proposition 218 and see his or her own tiendt,Ias made ! 1s�reet sweeping and special assess- -.what it will take to implement it, himself or `hereeH incapable mot apants on property m pay for such `hots In terms of new legislation performing the job for which he or ;things lie 8bradea po&e and RrR ' �litigation.... Hr. st . she was hired. .� ,,.-¢.' Bervfces. J^^5F,� rc t;.,; a M1:.. The league 6trongly opposed Thepuggeffiton that an emp�oYer I It calls for oVei;,!,I to `:-Proposition 218 during the.cam= is responsible for providing teat- win approval from a majority of paign, but spokeswoman_Debbie -went for the employees' problems -,Voters before raietng existing taxes. .'Thornton said its efforts'mow are troubles me.The simple answer is, or imposing new ones, ktroactive focused on trying to ',clarify,the, you "Get act together m getout." i January1995. "`'r`r.. ' measures prwiions not on over This problem is an indicator of ��pState fiscal officials estimated turning it. ' the overall breakdown of our Sod_ ghat the measure would cost local "The voterp havR spoken,", sty. .- ,, ;; governments about 8109 million a Thornton said.'Now we ere trying In recent Years We, Va created Rar, and T.os Angeles officials tssee how it can bgrmplemented." "politically correcVP terms to mini- ve identified about sill mrWan m ` M¢tso on krid$y ply Councilmen mize the Impact of macceptable anus"they he8eve are affected. >U"hard Alamrr'e,heatl of the cou"- behavior or to make it seem ac- calledforthe ceptable.H the behavior isn't con- :bete that Preceded the 8-3',vote' ' city attorrrey:to 5eport,to his com-, doned, we place blame on,others directing the.city.attsrney tsPre- .mrttee within tyro weeksmhelp sort for the problems we cause for jars a lawsdt—a move spear- out m dated what effect Proposition ourselves and we look to someone,elsetoprovidesolutions. headed'Iy Cotmcilw,,othan 7eckie"'218 wdl havemn the any ^'- is seeking Isn't it time we face reality and zeroed in onaproYtYon ethayatallowe take responsibility for our own 'only property ownersa �J In moat , x`!A 8st of general teesimposed,. actions? .'.:."' . .'_.:�...., : types of assessments. +,g ,atended or mnreased.,aRer the to about 's Jan Life T1 RYFI G.feeling MANN ;who do notchialng own ProPeCtY' appalhos 8.',whhi should belQecod'betore Mission Viejo ling ,_ ,;regardless of how,yon._,,. aters on the Junamumapal lu8ot.,,, happen m feel about Proposition a An analysis af'ifie likely effect 218," Counmwo"man'Ruth Galan- —of the me891ne an'the city's special ter said in urging her colleagues to utilities rates for':low-income a ask the courts to sort out the elderlyreisidents 'r' ,` constitutional Issues involved. *An analysis of bow it will affect . But Councilman Hal Bernson, current onto and what steps. who joined Joel Wachs and Rudy mustbetakentopreservethem. Svorimch, Jr. in voting no, said JA report on what,if any,other local government' officials had city revenues will be affected by "brought this on ourselves by themeasure.� using assessment districts and •Information about any other other devices to "try to get lawsuits that might be filed against around" Preposition 13, the land- the measure. Ara ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ems'"` NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Dale Subject D.C. ?1 i i�°r l //�l�tZ I �Il MIA THE SmvVER At the same time, technicians By the time the strike-team along walls, sloppy waste-han front the Orange County So ita- Searching out sewer dumpers members moved in on the busi- net in a back lot that might sig tion Districts open a manhole has become the hottest trend in ness,they had already developed flat trouble inside. NFORCEMENT: Envi- cover about half a block away environmental enforcement. a detailed case against it: timed "Sometimes routine Dick h tar and draw from the depths a "People are a lot more intelli- and dated computer readouts of Bets through a routine check; mmental cops COfflhal an Anaheim industrial drove are .unt Bu p drum-shapeddus device that cl a n- gent,mare advanced to how they all the chemicals, in parts per an Anaheim e tip- ff area. Bw se in illegal disposal tiles en industrial vacuum clean- dump this waste," said Deputy million, that had allegedly er. District Attorney Valerie Gris- Bowed downstream from the more often, the tip-off comes bi i chemicals down The device, an automatic wold of the office's envtronmen- business aver the previous Phone. ,range County sewers. chemical sampler attached to a tal-protection unit."We see them Catching sewer dumpers is oil underground, month. tricky business, however. If ni computer, shows an its electron- going 6 und,getting more One of those chemicals was far one is watching, r PAT BRENNAN is readout that a huge spike in sophisticated." above federal and state limits for B.dumping poison e Orange County Register acid levels flowed past its sensor The array of tools that enforce- sewer dumping. Acidic copper ous chemicals down the drain is ment agencies have at their fin- than an anonymous way to get rid o just that morning. waste rocketed to more than n g dim, hazy morn- Within two hours, investiga- MAgertips 900also has grown.The robot them. They mix into the larger ing, Anaheim jolts tors have obtained enough evi- MA 911a MAX looks like the robot morns Darts per million each flood of waste water that makes awake. Thousands of has a main the charm, but it morning about a a.m. The feder- dence to charge Pacific Image Y al cutoff is three arts per mil- its way in slow-moving wider showers flow, thou- Co with 74 felony counts of ille- has a certain besot nt members D V ground rivers to the Orange sands of toilets flushtoxic of the environmental strike lion. Such acid levels can burn Districts' A waste water sluices through goAlexuGodinez, whose waste.father team. human flesh. treatment plants in Htington indredsof milesof sewer pipes. owns the firm, said the accuse- "The computer can be pro- That's the highest copper Beach and Fountain Valley. In an unremarkable industrial grammed virtually any way we concentration ever found in the lion is false. ' useless owners who have irk tucked into the south side of "We're a very responsible want," said Kelly Christensen, history of the agency it said Dar- been convicted of sewer dumping wn,another morning ritual be- company dealing with a lot of supervisor of inspectors at the roll Ennis of the sanitation des- were usually adept enough to aste the aidillegal causticd enough to quality onknowu ournies around us reputation," Go- Orange collect samples Sanitation Dis- trThe raid ended months of un- perk everything gs so that,appearednn pa. r- irn the flesh off fingers. Down dtnez said. "We would never do over a period of days or for just, dercover work by district attor- mal; the amount of waste sent e drain and into the sewer goes say, 24 hours. This is an indis- ney investigator Kip Kinnings,a e bluish-green liquid, as it has anything like True or false,the sewer-dump- pensale piece of eqpmenl.thanb ui " quiet, quick-humored detective out for legal disposal matched l ery day for weeks. ing accusation is one of the most The team is composed of 30 with a fondness for backyard as- the amount of material coming But this time,Orange County's serious that the District Attor- agencies.On this day,it Included tronomy and cowboy bunts. Kin- in. Ivironmenlal cops are ready.A not only the sanitation districts nil s has his own lingo—crimi. Only tedious surveillance, fre- e nays Office has ever made. But y Y g D g uent "below-deck" sampling ,raven of cars,trucks and vans it is far from unique. and District Altorne s Office, flats are'•des"desperadoes"and sus- q Plin :mounds a small circuit-board In recent years, the number of band the Orange County Health pect businesses are "targets"— and a trained eye ran spot the anufacturer suspected of Care Agency and Anaheim police and uses a magnifying glass and signs of illegal dumping. Angry tmping the waste. such cases has grown. Prosecu- and fire departments. disguises in the course of]its in- employees or disgruntled neigh- Investigators, lors cite two reasons: More busi- burs often ti o armed with pis- ness owners are using the sewers The raid on the circuit-bgard vestiga[ions. p off the Uisirict At- Is and wearing District A[tor- to dump waste that would be ex- maker came after nearly two Instead of searching for drops torney's Office to possible viola. .y's Office jackets, present pensive to dispose of legally,and months of dead-of-night surveil- of blood or telltale hairs, Itowev- tons, but that is only the begin- eir search warrant to sur- law-enforcement officials are us- lance and the covert lowering er,Kinnings seeks the signatures rung. iced employees. ing new, high-tech instruments and raising of SIGMA 900. of illegal waste disposal: suspi- HUNTING HAZARDOUS-WASTE DUMPERS process of elimination Orange County Sanitation District investigators use samplers to test sewage for pH levels, -Bracketing-is one strategy that use samplers near which determines amount of acids or alkalis.High acid levels generate low pH.High alkali a business suspected / levels generate high PH.High levels of alkali or acid are toxic and can burn skin or corrode of dumping - metal and concrete,so investigators look for extremely low or high PH levels. toxic waste. Chemical sampler lilijamigm,©DMattransfer Closing in Sampler "moo } III I Programmed to unit Information ►If a business is sus placed uP dl take sewage stored in sampler stream of samplesatspecfik _ downloaded: toxicw asfte,dumping bynneu to intervals and at combined later get of igalorf begin manhole, from dy j specific PH levels with chemical q,manhole sampling d - 44 analysis ofsample bymanhole dsch3fgeof sewage other Q Computer: ►Offenders usually busmeoes. "a, Samili Records time. dumPalsamb emeof 3 date,pH level of day.often in mom ng emplaced dowo- t sample and bottle stream of scs inwhkhil'sstored petted bud-,►Each business has ess totake 1, Ij Sampkrgdoes ©DHtribulor. Permit on file with t Othef" samples of in' rwtshaw abnomwl counlydetailing discharge.Pours sample into btniressesa115amPH Hr but one of 24 plastic chemicals Samplerli rt use \ , bottles V investigatorson determine illegal suckss water sam- ©Sam �� dumper. ater pleintounkwhen - triggered by con, Pla tic pater ar pH probe Sampler 71 lyP1 ' v' Source:Orange Cowry b. Ins Santaran Dntrins OPH probe: P.Cabe al sigwtur. Graphic reponing: Measures PH level of wastewater can be eHalS poll n of water as tracked to specific Manholes Bows by businesses. MANY IISNrrhe Orange County Register But the biggest price tar sewer dumping is paid by businesses. The motive for dumping waste in When Kinnings picks up a po- the sewer is usually financial, entially hot case,he begins what 'Kinnings said. If company presi- dents to dispose of waste, they dentsowners , they can or e to pay ante. A quick site inspection. Irl on a weekend morning, for make more money printing cir- % Y coif boards. instance, to snap pictures of the "The profits could create a •,roperty while no one is around.le will go over the photos wit new Corvette or Mercedes-Benz ih for the president or vice presi- Ts magnifying glass for evi- dent by the end of the year,"Kin- ence of illegal dumping. nings said. Or maybe a visit to the compa- That means undercutting the oy during business hours — in competing firm dawn the street. Jnick l of course o la catch s And thatmeans the desperadoes perform glimpse of how workers Ilerform their [asks. Kinnings bet rich at the expense of law- has even slipped into the crowd abiding citizens. :hound o lunch wagon near a sus- pect company's property, chat- ling up employees and getting lidbits that he can later use to build his case. If he finds nothing wrong — All ,hat the business is complying •� f .%ith regulations —he fades into -lie twilight. "The businesses never know I "'3t % _•` ••, was there," Kinnings said. But if he suspects that a busi- ness is dumping illegally, it Allim won't be long before the enforce- p 4 r ,I, ment squad rolls in. The county prosecutes sewer dumping cases for various reo- .. ' Ys sons. But unlike other environ- .>ef �. �l-•i .J - mental crimes, sewer dumping. usually does not involve a direct ' i - R ;i';i• `: ` threat to the public. The threat,instead,is to sewer workers, who can suffer injury t ' nr death if they breathe poison. DOWN IT uus vapors. GOES: Darrell .e K t+ai t, There also is a financial threat Ennis, an "LL t h,�r q` '+.4"v �� f:',. sr to the sanitation districts' waste assistant source- t yUf f water treatment plant,which re- control rye-�"L' it ` TESTING, moves and reycles human inspector for the i{; `! :- b TESTING: A waste for fertilizer. Conla nina. Orange County , , , . :,, 4: county Hon of the waste with excessive Sanitation ` I % t sanitation heavy metals, such as copper, Districts, lowers I i t:.f employee means it cannot be recycled; the the Isco device � i, measures the p districts must pay to have the into a drainpipe of samples waste hauled away. so it can analyze c ' �. .. collected from the levels of > '" sewer drain by acids and bases I I ` :� r �. • 11 using a device there. �,.. fy' 7+• a % rallyd thr hm. ,. ,•5�� ;A DRAIN SLEUTH: • ..r�` Kip Kinnings, investigator for the District ;J Attorney's Office, examines a storm drain in out county last month. Kinnings — who often wears disguises during the course of his investigations — looksforthe signatures of illegal waste disposal: ' .r supicious etchings in 4 concrete drainage channels, discoloration along walls and sloppy waste- handling in a cornpany's back - lot that might signal trouble inside. Photos by DANIEL A. ANDERSON/yhe Orange County Register L.A. City Council Will Go to Court.Over Prop. 218 ii Qovernment: Measure ,, mark property-tax limitations that ' voters approved in 1878 ' �+ gives voters=6 greater 1 don't think we should be • SubstaIIce AbUW .. control over municipal spending�,Buy p taxpayer the voters ia.Le R 7Or1.�1.d� levies, MRAr loss of who roundly approved Proposition. n Lth Yv Ll 1 v 218,Bernson said. r-; .�..:,. .. revenue IS predlC'teA. Joel Fox. head of the organiza- ■Re "Inquiry, Leads to Filings at t., t ! uon'Umt sponsored Proposition O.C.Sewage Plante, Nov.h " " By JEAN MERL '? �3",'<<! a ' 218,the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers It seems rather appropriate that Hues sum warren .h!. ', ^,� �`t: t;Asm.,said he was not surprised by we discover a group of draggles . The Los Angeles City Council6n the council vote but nonetheless operating in Orange County's sew Friday narrowly decided, a we found it"outrageous." age plana. .� , G.HOWLE'1T over Proposition 218, the reeantly ," nse is to tr� to .il =it Inw. !!Their rust the ace ck of Net/ passed state Imitative that gave _Fullerton =,constituents,"Fox said. voters much greater say over local He defended We assessments ■The fact that a number of em- tax and fee measures t-':'i 't ployees at a sewage Vestment Although several local 'govern- `•provision..saying his organization plant are drug users is not surpris- went groups have talked about carefully built [the measure] on ing. The problem of substance going to court over the measure— Previous law." *s,r si5 -?-{ abuse among workers seems to be approved by California voters Up to now,many types of assess-, pervasive. 56.57o•93.Sgo an Nov. 5—Los An- ments could be levied by mumcfpab When an employer contracts 4ela could well be the first to lawmakers milers a majority,of the with an employee to Provide a actually do so, initiative-watchers affected properly ownersprotestM service, the employer expects the teatd Friday. - " - A spokeswoman for the lAague employee a show:up for .work -t Proposition 218 targets all mu- of Calfforna Cities said the organ- drug-andalcohol-free. " '*," nicipal levies—general axes such zation has been working with a The employer.should not be am Nose imposed on hotel raoits;. '.�otvolunteer city.atarneys m expected to pay someone who,by ' 'fees for specific services such an ;,gofhrougti Prope®tlon 218 and see his or her own Bondi ties "made *eet sweeping and special assess- What It will take to implement it, himself or 'herself anapable "of ants on property to pay for such `Toth in terms of new legislation performing the job[or which beer %ngCeas lib es pohce.and fire '" B�gaea gde ltr ugly opposed she was hired. ,: `L,: Thepuggestian diet an employer ['Il calls for 7oeel^goVernm�me to Proposition 218"during. the.cam= is responsible for providing treat- .win approval from a majority of Paige, but spokeswoman Debbie went for the employees' problems •peters before ralstng exisflitg axes .'Thornton said its efforts Now are troubles me.The simple answer is: .Dr imposing neat/gnesretroactive. -focused on trying to clarify the. "Get your act together or get om." 7t January3965 - 0.. measure's provislana notonoder This problem Is an indicator of FpSate decal otficiais estimated lurnng n. ' . ^ , ,; the overall breakdown of our Beef- ithat the meesure'would coal local '"The voters.;hays .:spoken, sty. . _:. �,;:. 'governments about $100 million a Thoroan said:fNow we ere trying In recent years we have created ytsar, and Lae Angeles otficislsn a see how It can beimplemented" "politic�lly correct"terms a mini- 'pave tdentifted about$31 milllouln..t i fSllso on:l;Yljltyy ty;;CouneWnan mize the Impact of,unacceptable revenues they believe are effected. - Richard Aatorre,timed of the coun- behavior or to make it seem ac- j-ifn [he someanes emotional de 'sg's budget committee,celled for the cepable.if the behavior an't con- :bate that preceded the 8-3',vot'e" 'city at(otvey,to'[epurt tg his,corn- doned. we pace blame on;others 'ojrecting the.dty,atarney epee- mfttee within two weeks to helpsori. for the problems we cause for yore a aweult—a move spear- mil in detail what effect Proposition ourselves and we look to someone headed tiq Counellwoman 7eCl[a "`218'.vt8 have on the tlty ""-"'�" else to provide solutions ;Goldberg=eovnef "> memberg.- •,tlrheintormatlon hap seeking. ant it time we face reality and aeroed Iron a Innvi n thatallow �i'mdudes '','' =t wi th 4 y 4, take responsibility for our own 'oNy Property owners:a say in qA Bet of general taxes Imposed. actions? "_:t.-... . -.types o[aeeessmena..:. $y r„g r Oded o inereased.�sller the Life bei tjuat about feeling good. =Dlsentranchieing tl}oee Yotere measure's January 1995 cute:date, KATHRYN G.WEINMANN l2tme1r8P;sP'oe lnCd o.i,aunn urcfilegweilno gma bhaoenur'tRc oPull.trohea pgGousa"eiltias onan-.._".."ouft W•t hAtleen sm a neraaasltyeasse ts'taoon(''[U':�ti lteoelw aded before Mission Viejo npilbeUoL tey ls cit3es special -income or eek the courls 'to sort out the elderly resdentA eonsntutional issues involved *An analyse of bow it will affect .. But Councilmen-Hal Hernson, current assessments and what steps. who joined Joel Wachs and Rudy must be taken to preserve them. ' - Svorinch• Jr. in voting no, said. e A report on what,:any,other local government officials had city revenues will be affected by 'brought this on ourselves by the measure.` using assessment districts and elnformation about any Baer other devices to "try to get lawsuits that might be filed against around" Proposition 13. the land- the measure. � �/�aa�9lrAzf-awu oli r PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL r r r r PHASE V REPORT FOR SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA r r r CONFIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 247 West Bonita Avenue San Dimas, California 91773 r (909) 592-7070 LIC. l/P.I.13889 r r 1 INTRODUCTION r As an integral page part of the recent investigations, Confidential Management Services conducted secondary interviews in an effort to provide management with insight and analysis based upon interviewee responses. Utilizing the exit interview format, we have attempted to provide tangible information which the Sanitation Districts of Orange County organization can use to improve prospective employment experiences. The interviews were structured to encourage frank and constructive comments. We believe these comments will provide not only valuable insights, but also a road map for management to follow in identifying problem areas which may negatively impact the organization. We have focused on those areas which influence the culture and behavior of employees. We urge the reviewers of this report to keep in mind that these interviews are obviously a random sample. Total validation would require interviews with a larger sample of the organization. ,r The following five objectives governed the interview process: 1. to ascertain how Sanitation Districts of Orange County is perceived as a place to work; 2. to assess the effectiveness of the communication process; r 3. to determine if employees believe the districts are sensitive to their concerns; 4. to assess the emotional atmosphere within the organization; and °r 5. to provide appropriate recommendations. It is paramount to keep in mind that these comments are employee perceptions and, as such, constitute reality, policy and truth, regardless of the organization's or management's intentions. v r MORALE ANALYSIS The responses of employees interviewed reflect a perception that morale is on the downside of average. Employees perceive management as having little, if any, concern for their well being other than to get the product out. There were continuing references to "management's" knowledge of employee participation in employee malfeasance regarding theft and participation in substance use. These actions were perceived as indicators of a lack of management concern about employees so long as there was not impact on performance. Upon closer analysis, there are several issues which need to be reviewed to put these r perceptions into perspective: Cultural Change, Cultural Clash r Major changes have been put into place in an effort to change the culture of the district. The "old" culture, which was one of benevolent paternalism, is being replaced by a culture that is based upon more communication and employee empowerment. A new managerial style and philosophy has emerged. The new management team appears to be putting into place a structure which involves greater accountability and enhanced performance expectations. District employees are reacting to these changes with fear and resistance. In spite of the increased volumes of communication, there is not clarity with respect to the goals of the district, and a review of the methods utilized to communicate the "changes" must be undertaken and redirected for maximum impact and effectiveness. Organizational Resistance "Managers/supervisors" are resistant to the "new organizational order" in large part because it requires a different skill set than the one required in the ^• command and control environment which has existed in the past. A lack of "buy- in"/ownership exists principally due to the very real belief that they lack the skills to manage/supervise in the new cultural environment. Equipping these employees with the requisite skill set will enhance the necessary buy-in/ownership and make them active change agents for facilitation. Blue collar workers are resistant, because they have a major concern about job stability within the district. Virtually all of the district's efforts are viewed as motive (privatization) driven and, therefore, suspect. Additionally, the behavior (continued) change expected of employees - bottom-up communication, open door policies, etc. - faces strong resistance from the required major change agent facilitators (fast line supervisors and managers). Additionally, these perceptions are further compounded by an inconsistent application of policies and procedures. The cumulative effect of these perceptions have contributed in a major way to the perception of morale being poor. In order to improve morale, the district must redirect its effort to bring about the desired changes by adopting focused, pro-active approaches to convince employees that these perceptions are unfounded and that management can be trusted. Managers, supervisors and leads must be assessed in terms of their ability to manage their y work force in a positive manner. They should be provided with the appropriate training to accomplish this purpose. If they do not possess the capacity to be successful, then the district will have to take the necessary actions to remove them from these positions. KEY POINTS: ♦ Morale Perceived As Fair To Low ♦ Major cultural change ,,, ♦ Fear of new culture ♦ Perception that "management' does not care .. ♦ Privatization . ♦ Credibility and Fairness ♦ Policy and procedure administration r ♦ Disciplinary process administration ♦ Resistance Barrier m ♦ Managers/supervisors skill sets ♦ Buy-in/ownership ♦ Relinquishing old management style (continued) ♦ Employee Empowerment ♦ Managers and employees not operating from an agreed upon definition ♦ Change Facilitator "' ♦ Creating "change agents" ♦ Introduce change facilitation training into organization r ♦ Management Culpability ♦ Leads and supervisors participating in malfeasant behavior ♦ Management knowledge of malfeasant behavior without taking effective action r r r r r r r r r DISCIPLINE ANALYSIS Discipline, as a concept, appears to be evolving from a state where it existed in theory to a state of structured accountability. Employees clearly perceive discipline as being much stricter than in the past. Overall, it appears that the concept of discipline lost much of its impact in translation to practical action. Employees recognize that supervision was somewhat lax with respect to disciplinary action and they took advantage, as the results of this investigation have demonstrated. Most critical is the fact that many managers and supervisors do not feel empowered to discipline. Their past experiences with the process has caused many to simply "talk the talk" but not "walk the talk." Past reversals of disciplinary actions have also contributed to this feeling of a lack of empowerment. Summarizing the analysis of discipline, it is clear that discipline was not being applied consistently or on a timely basis. A review of culpable employee personnel records will probably reflect a number of employees who, by reasonable standards, should have been terminated or at least been well into the progressive disciplinary cycle. „. Managers and first line supervisors will require training in the basic fundamentals of rudimentary discipline. It will be necessary to develop an agreed upon approach for administering discipline, with expectations and policies clearly communicated to all employees, especially fast line supervisors. �- KEY POINTS: ♦ Lax Discipline/Dual Frustrations ♦ Employees and supervisors not clear on expectations, creating weak, confusing policies and procedures ♦ Management inaction - tacit approval of employee malfeasance (continued) ♦ Administrative Procedures r ♦ How well do supervisors understand the disciplinary process with accompanying documentation requirements? r ♦ Tolerance Training -� ♦ How much is too much? ♦ Progressive vs. non-progressive disciplinary actions r ♦ Diminishing return: too little vs. too much "' ♦ Communication Training r ♦ Supervisory ability to communicate behavioral expectations ♦ Disciplinary Empowerment r ♦ Allow managers/supervisors to have ownership of the process r ♦ Skill Set Development ♦ Managers' understanding of disciplinary concepts and application r r r r FAVORITISM ANALYSIS Employees expressed rather strong feelings regarding their perceptions concerning �— favoritism. There were several specific incidents which allowed employees to point specifically at as indicators of how the district practices or allows favoritism to occur. The issue involving the DUIs and salaried employees has become somewhat of a "cause cdRbre" for many employees. If these perceptions were taken at face value, it would lead to the conclusion that employees truly believe the district does practice or allow favoritism. Upon closer analysis, however, the major underlying factor which contributes to this perception is the inconsistent application of policies and procedures. A further example, such as attendance related discipline, adds to this perception rather than the simple fact ,d that each supervisor has his/her own standard in terms of disciplinary action. Clearly communicated policies and procedures, with consistent application, are needed to help eliminate this perception. KEY POINTS: ♦ Inconsistent Policy Application ♦ Policy and Procedure Erosion ti. ♦ Precedent Actions ♦ Policy erosion ♦ Employee discovered culpability - no management action °" ♦ Policy Application ♦ Application on a timely basis ♦ Lead Selection TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS r The district's approach is very extensive and broad based and is, principally, compliance driven. The emphasis on training represents a major shift in philosophy in that the district has evolved from minimum training to an urgency-driven, aggressive process. Employees, for the most part, are embracing the training opportunities favorably. Managers and supervisors, however, perceive the training as "too much too fast." Basically, there is a feeling that the time allowed for training impacts their departments' productivity and needs to be cut back. Training is viewed as the responsibility of the training department with r managers/supervisors having the responsibility of providing employees to attend the training sessions. Viewing training as being driven by something outside of their control r and input, the ownership and buy-in is somewhat lacking. Overall, the district's approach has been very good in that its major objective was to get into compliance as quickly as possible. Essentially, that objective has been completed. Now, the emphasis should be focused on training which builds the infrastructure to support and facilitate the new culture and management style. r First line supervisors are a major priority. Stoll set training, which will allow them to - function effectively within the new management philosophy, is critical to the ultimate ., success of this major organizational change. It is fair to say that most of the present supervisors have had little, if any, training in becoming "change agents"; yet, they have a major, if not the most critical, role in the success of the process. Middle and upper management are faced with the same issue; therefore, they must also be trained in the "change agent" facilitation process. The role of outside consultants should be re-examined as it relates to the district's ultimate mission and philosophy. Consultants should be utilized to train trainers and serve as resource facilitators to the internally designated trainers. Management and employees should receive training on working in an "employee empowerment environment." It is fairly clear that the definition and expectations of employee empowerment are drastically different, and perhaps even incompatible, at different levels of the organization. The training effort in this critical area should focus on managing and working in this environment, and arriving at a common agreed upon - definition of the concept and how it will function within the district. (continued) KEY POINTS: ♦ Training Accountability ♦ Establish buy-in/ownership at management and department levels * ♦ Training hour allocation to departments similar to budget allocation process ♦ Managers' performance appraisals are impacted by how they manage their training hour allocatings [Training department maintains the overall responsibility of training but becomes more of a resource.) ♦ Train Trainers e. ♦ Focus on developing more in-house trainers �, ♦ designate core trainers ♦ establish supervisor accountability ♦ establish trainer recognition ♦ establish trainee recognition ♦ Use consultants as facilitators as opposed to doers ♦ Prioritize First Line Supervisor Training ♦ Focus on skill set development that is correlated to new management style, expectations, etc. ♦ Middle management should also receive skill set training that focuses on managing in the "new" district style '" ♦ Overall Training _ ♦ Focus on development and improvement needs identified in performance appraisal process COMMUNICATIONS ANALYSIS The district has put together a comprehensive communication approach which includes hotlines, open door policy, regular meetings, voice mail usage, employee action teams, town hall meetings, pipeline, and performance appraisals. Employees and managers acknowledge that meetings are held with consistent regularity, and that the management team affords employees the opportunity to express their opinions and concerns. Employees, also, acknowledge that while they are afforded the opportunity, they are not speaking up in the meetings. It is clear that each of the communication methods are working with varying degrees of success. However, considering the purpose for the needed emphasis on communication (communicating and facilitating organization change), the focus should be re-directed. The two essential ingredients in communicating organizational change are the participation of the front line supervisors and their ability to communicate the message of what is changing and why. The credibility of the changes is directly correlated to where the message is coming from and how it is delivered. "Employees would rather receive information from their immediate supervisors than from senior managers." It is therefore critical that the communication process and message be tied into teaching your first line supervisors how to communicate. In other words, teach them the process ,. from A to Z and allow them to do it. Middle managers are not exempt from this need; therefore, they also need to be taught the communication process. The ability to communicate the facts and answer questions is critical (particularly for first line supervisors) for change agent facilitation. The other existing communication methods are, as mentioned, all working to varying degrees, but a review and minor modification will probably serve to enhance their success. KEY POINTS: ♦ Employee Meetings ♦ Conduct smaller group meetings to encourage better participation (continued) ♦ Implement "coffee chat meetings" (supervisors conduct short meetings with employees during break periods) ♦ Process basically controlled by first line supervisors ♦ Establish accountability for communicating feedback ♦ Open Door Policy ♦ Periodic request initiated by managers ♦ Communication Card Development °" ♦ Once per month, employees submit questions on cards. Supervisors provide answers to these questions at scheduled meetings (i.e., safety) or other planned meetings ♦ Development of a Communication Matrix .. ♦ Develop a communication matrix for first line supervisors to communicate directly with employees ♦ Introduce Ombudsman Concept ♦ Provide a communication trust bridge ♦ Resource Support ♦ Use managers and communication department as resource to develop organizational communication skills r WAGES r ANALYSIS r Employees' perception regarding wages was, generally, positive. There is a clear r recognition by employees that wages are more than competitive. KEY POINTS: r ♦ Favorable Perception of Wages ♦ Human Resources Offset `r ♦ Addressing issues such as communications, favoritism, etc. r r r r r r r r r r BENEFITS ANALYSIS a. There was virtual unanimity with respect to benefits. Employees have a great recognition of the value of the benefit package. KEY POINTS: ♦ Positive Perception of Benefit Package ♦ Communication of Benefit Package ♦ Illustration of dollar cost comparison reflecting employee cost for medicines (out of pocket) vs. cost of procedure .. ♦ Communicate benefits on an on-going basis (not connected to negotiations) m d r V SPECIFIC PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISORY TRAINING OBJECTIVE: to develop the first line and district management group into an effective and confident team of professional managers trained in the principles of supervision. WE RECOMMEND supervisory training focused specifically on the following outline: Supervisory responsibilities in management procedures 1. Progressive discipline: how to accomplish 2. How to discipline poor performance .. 3. Employee redress procedure a. what does it mean? r b. how does it work? 4. Effective documentation 5. Manage without fear of third party review 6. Consistent application of policies and procedures .. 7. Team building/facilitation training r W r ee DISTRICT COMMUNICATION PROGRAM r OBJECTIVE: to establish a broader, overall inclusive communication plan for the ., district, utilizing present communication tools. WE RECOMMEND: r ♦ Develop a management communication matrix focusing on first line supervision and management involvement and accountability ♦ Establish communication skill development training for managers '� ♦ Evaluate present tools ♦ Supervisors and management conducting regularly scheduled meetings with their departments to improve the communication effort BASIC SKILLS DEVELOPED: r a. Listening skills b. Verbalizing skills r C. Responding skills d. Re-enforcing skills e. Questioning skills r r r r r r r SUBSTANCE ABUSE AWARENESS TRAINING OBJECTIVE: to have all managers be able to identify, and effectively intervene in, employee substance abuse situations. WE RECOMMEND that the Sanitation Districts of Orange County put all managers through -� a substance training program. BASIC SKILLS DEVELOPED: a. Awareness - knowledge of substance abuse b. Identification - recognition of symptoms C. Intervention - effective intervention to resolve problem i i i i i i i Y Y Y i i SCREENING OBJECTIVE: to "screen out" as opposed to "screening in." WE RECOMMEND: ♦ Broad background checks .. ♦ Interview skill training for managers r CLIMATE ANALYSIS SURVEY OBJECTIVE: to ascertain the opinions of all employees to corroborate the opinions expressed by culpable employees. WE RECOMMEND that the district conduct a climate analysis (employee opinion survey)with ^� timely feedback and resolution (by outside source). r r r PERIODIC MINI-AUDIT r OBJECTIVE: to assess progress on these or any other items embarked on by the district. r WE RECOMMEND conducting mini-audits to determine effectiveness and impact. r r r r r r r r JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT JOINT BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 1996 1 . I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE AND ASK THE DIRECTORS TO ADOPT JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 96-86 COMMENDING FRED BARRERA FOR HIS OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE UPON HIS RETIREMENT AS A DIRECTOR OF THE DISTRICTS. DIRECTOR BARRERA SERVED AT VARIOUS TIMES AS A MEMBER OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE AND THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, AS CHAIR OF DISTRICT NO. 1 , AND AS A REPRESENTATIVE TO DISTRICTS 1 , 2, 7, 13 AND 14. IS THERE A MOTION? 2. AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO REMIND YOU OF THE MEETING SCHEDULES FOR THE NEXT TWO MONTHS FOR THE WORKING COMMITTEES: OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE WILL NOT MEET IN DECEMBER. THE NEXT MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 8TH, 1997. PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE IS NOT SCHEDULED TO MEET IN DECEMBER. THE NEXT MEETING WILL BE JANUARY 9TH, 1997. THERE IS AN AD HOC COMMITTEE RE STRATEGIC PLAN SCHEDULED FOR THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5TH AT 5 P.M. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE: AT THIS TIME THE FAHR COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET DECEMBER 11TH. BECAUSE OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS, HOWEVER, THE COMMITTEE MAY BE REQUESTED TO MEET IN LATE NOVEMBER OR EARLY DECEMBER, DEPENDING IN PART ON OUR DECISIONS IN CLOSED SESSION TONIGHT. THE STEERING COMMITTEE WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 18TH AT 5:30 P.M., IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE JOINT BOARDS MEETING, SCHEDULED AT 7:30 P.M. FOR YOUR INFORMATION, THE DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES WILL BE CLOSED THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 28TH AND FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 29TH, TO OBSERVE THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY; TUESDAY, DECEMBER 24TH AND WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 25TH FOR CHRISTMAS; AND WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 1ST, NEW YEAR'S DAY. 3. 1 WILL BE HOSTING A RECEPTION FOR DEPARTING MEMBERS ON DECEMBER 18TH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE JOINT BOARDS MEETING AT CHEVY'S ON BROOKHURST, SOUTH OF ELLIS. I'D LIKE ALL OF OUR DEPARTING AND CONTINUING DIRECTORS, AS WELL AS THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT AND BOARD SECRETARY STAFF TO JOIN ME. 4. AN ORIENTATION FOR NEW BOARD MEMBERS IS SCHEDULED FOR SATURDAY, JANUARY 18TH, 1997 AT A TIME TO BE DETERMINED. RETURNING DIRECTORS ARE ALSO INVITED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED NEXT MONTH. 5. 1 ADDRESSED LAFCO ON NOVEMBER 6TH AND RECOMMENDED THAT THEY NOT INITIATE A CONSOLIDATION OF THE DISTRICTS. I REMINDED THEM THAT WE WOULD HAVE SEVERAL NEW BOARD MEMBERS AFTER THE ELECTIONS, AND THAT OUR BEST OPTION APPEARS TO BE SPECIAL LEGISLATION. IT WILL TAKE SOME TIME TO BRING THESE NEW MEMBERS UP TO SPEED AND TO DEVELOP THE LANGUAGE FOR A BILL. LAFCO AGREED TO THIS ALTHOUGH THEY DID INDICATE THAT THEY EXPECTED PROGRESS TO BE MADE. IN THE ABSENCE OF PROGRESS, THEY MAY INITIATE CONSOLIDATION. MUMNO DATE: NOVEMBER 20. 1996 Tore 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS: 1.2.3.5.6.7.11.13 & 14 MnrnICT 9 JOINT BOARDS '/ IMMFMOI..............AM GUIGAN........... IKEPNYI .................BOWMAN............yam _ IPERPVBCHMERI........FFMVMAN ........ IFCRSYTND..............BROWN ...........•.y' _— ICOONTD..............AQIRPHr IBcO .................COWNS tom. BSI............... BALTAPE1.11 .......... .•.•••••• _ICOXI . ................TDESAY .............. 18TDNFAI ..............BTAMON ............ ICO%I ...................DE9AY .............. DIIIBIA I .... BREW ...................DMES .. IMUAI ....... . ....D L . GWM .............ENPODE IPAPI ................DUNA ............... GUWXSOM ... .. .. . WCH ...............ECKFNNDE .......... ............DOLLN6 PERRYS .........FERRYMAN ..... ............Dmm ...............IBew .... (ANDEf8MI ............. LOM ......... PARKER) D ................ _ _ _—_IMARSHAW .............ORIFNN .. ........... _ WloEpsDM ...........JIOPA ............... IWELCMI ..............—"— _ IMORENOI..............MCOUIOAN ........ IWAROI..................HAMMOND............ _ (DOONTD..............ARMPHY ............. IBAUFPI .................LDPDD.............. _ (BANKHEAM............NMBY ............... IMINERI..................MNN ................ EMAKIM...............SINGER .. ....... IMORENOI................MC GUIOAN........... _ (BTMERI ..............9TANTM .......... ICOONTD......I.........MUMHY IDALYI ................SDAD. ...............(� = ..... NDPBY .............. _ IEVANS) ...............—SAL ................. DISTRICTS IRO WN)................MLTMBIE .......... ,/ IMAKIM ..............9A%EN ............... j IWBONI................SINGER..............X- IIlANETI...............LNGER ................/L SMON�AKET.................SINGER .............\4�� IXERRYI ...............JOWMAN............. STHNW ............... BTAHTM............. — IFORStt ............JDH)WN WANTON)...............9H1MEq.............. WRLE _ .— ISCm'TI ...............DOWNB ............. fWML(.................SWAN .............. (PARKER( ..............DUNUP.............. JL pVAHLSTR0IA............SYIMA .......... IANDERBDM ...........ROM ............... IGULLIX9014 .............WELCH.............. IMAPSHaUJ ............MIFRN .............. IDMYI ..................MINIM .............. — IMUERI ...............IHPTIG ............ — (MINER)................MNN ................. (MORENO)..............=WIGMI ............ STAFF OTHERS . IMNKHEADI............110RBY............... ANDERBDN WOODRUFF ...�� (EVANS) ...............flCE ... ... MAY ....... ANDRUB ... JK. 18TEINDB..............9TANTM ..••• •••... HOMES..... DEMIR ... ...... IMY) TRO.............9YLVIA KME .......JG XNOPF .......�� IOALYI ................3MEL ....>•.......... 'i KYLE ......../ LEE ..........— UNDER ......� DNDSTpOM...— DISTRICT B LUOWIN ....._ NIXON .......� ... BNAW .......� ICO%1 .................DEM MCINWRE Y ............... JL ISTANTOM..........T.aFONFIr............= OOTEN STONE .......� PETERNA!::: ............. (DEBAYI ...............DEB ................ .�( .......... DISTRICT B TUMMAN ... .......... ._ WHFATIFT...yi _ ICO%IICOX)PIERR R]u1F6D........FERRYMAN ........... NT.LdON... .......... „ .................DFMY ............... .............� ISTANTOM............TBFENOr............ ... ...— OVAR01... WE*kwe .............HAMMOND ......... DMTT51................EKLTARDL 1/YfW IcwI :MOREIPERP ....E ...........5 NO)..............MCOUIMN ........... ICOONTD..............MMPHr .......... _ DISTRICT 19 ImamIMUEPI BAUERl ...............1BPDG .......... V^ A.1 (, ............... (S JMNT FF ............ _ G(/ (STONER( ..............BTAMON ............ � DISTRICTIS •///,�_ �PP [PARKIDALVI ................]Gi1FL ............... NLW.'..'� (J ER( ..............DUMAP..............y/ / ICOONRI..............ARIRPIIY .............J� _ IBTAMONI............:'9i9NDr.............� DLSTBICT 14 iPOTTSI................SALTAREW ........... coMMEl.........M.M..MURPHY .............. IWAROI................HAMMMD ........ _ I .I..................... (MIUFRI .....SWAN ...............Jl H:\WP_OTAUOMIN\08lOIpECTOP\,10190 0910/95 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ' ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 7 //oLu AGENDA ITEM NO. o� * * * * k k * k * k * * * * k * * k * t * * k t t * t NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) l?q4 Whfe,lov� HOME ADDRESS: I y 8.3 a m..iland S& , NUMBER STREET /rliolwa� crl.. CITY YZIwl, 9a6ss � P COD TELEPHONE: 8 78 - 6 y07 REPRESENTING: Se if (SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION F28A PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY November 20, 1996 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print Please Print CSpp DATE PAID 10/02/95 10/16/96 HANDWRITES ALL DISTRICTS Joint Opereeng Fund - 783,414.37 431.629,89 179,M,72 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,303,031.20 298.210,03 0.00 Joint Woddng Capital Fund - 655.530,53 165,398.83 6,48280 Salf-Funded Insurance Funds - 103.717.29 14,496.69 10.000.00 DISTRICT NO.1 - 105,00 386.70 000 DISTRICT NO.2 - 11,148,09 1,402,99 0.00 DISTRICT NO.3 - 27,598,89 137,480,78 0.00 DISTRICT NO,5 - 1,163.12 221.23 O.OD DISTRICT NO.6 - 45.00 163.80 0.00 DISTRICT NO.7 - 232,049.93 3,560.85 0.00 DISTRICT N0,11 - 2,434.22 18,496.28 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 39.30 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - $2,01 0.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NO.187 JOINT - 0,00 0.00 0.00 DISTRICTS NO.3 A 11 JOINT - 0,00 080 0.00 DISTRICTS NO.586 JOINT - 955.48 0.00 000 DISTRICTS NO.5 A 7 J0INT - 213.74 0.00 OM DISTRICTS N0,7814 JOINT - 15.78 0.00 0,00 TOTALS 4,121,5D4.65 1,071,487.37 195,256,52 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0927/98 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10MMS POSTING DATE 10/02i96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPRON 154548 AEES PUBLICATIONS $174.00 PUBLICATION 164649 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $267.42 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154550 AT&T-PROWATTS $939.44 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 164551 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $0.21 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154552 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $6.39 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154553 ABATIX ENVIRONMENTAL $336.34 MISC.HARDWARE 164564 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $117.75 DOOR REPAIRS 154555 AIR UQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $822.45 SPECIALTYGASSES 164656 AIR PHOTO SERVICES $1,129.23 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 154557 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $162.47 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 164658 AMERICAN AIRLINES $5,098.95 TRAVEL SERVICES 154559 AMERICAN BUILDING $43.43 SUBSCRIPTION 154560 AMERICAN SIGMA $10,674.72 CONTROLLER SAMPLER 154561 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS INC. $892.44 LAB SUPPLIES 154562 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $150.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154563 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $1,630.00 LAB SERVICES 154564 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $120.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 154565 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SER.INC. $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154566 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $3,879.00 WIRE ROPE 154567 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $810.00 LAB ANALYSIS 154568 THE BALBOA SAY CLUB $3,529.70 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON 164669 BANANA BLUEPRINT $61SAS PRINTING M011-07-94 164570 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $327.58 BATTERIES 154571 HAUER COMPRESSOR $166.25 COMPRESSOR PARTS 154572 BIOGRO DIVISION $70,751.47 RESIDUALS REMOVAL NO 4.26-95 154573 BLACK&VEATCH $846.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI 46,P2-55 154574 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,994.21 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.4-14-93 154575 BNA COMMUNICATIONS,INC. $16.00 FREIGHT 154576 BOILER&COMBUSTION $590.00 REGISTRATION 154577 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $258.60 TRUCK REPAIRS 154578 BOOTBARN $96.87 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 164579 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3,815.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES M01.12.94 164580 BURLINGTON SAFETY LAB INC. $126.00 TESTING SERVICES 154581 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,316.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.8-8-94 154582 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $720.00 GASANALYSIS 164683 CRC PRESS,INC. $112.70 PUBLICATION 154584 CS COMPANY $16.405.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154585 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $163,728.34 CONSTRUCTION 7-22,7-24 154686 CALTROL,INC. $137.21 HARDWARE 154587 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $373.37 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 154588 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $112.24 SERVICE AGREEMENT 164589 CALIF CENTRIFUGAL PUMP $5,110.00 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154590 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $126.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 154591 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTIC $425.00 DIRECT&OVERLAPPING DEBT STATEMENT 154592 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $763.50 MOVING SERVICES 154593 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEY INC $119,113.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-40-1,J-40-2 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/27/BB PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10102M POSTING DATE 10/02M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154594 CAPIO $125.00 MEMBERSHIP 154595 PATRICK CARNAHAN $250.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 154596 CARTER-AMER.FLEET SERVICE $171.00 AUTO PARTS 164597 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $866.02 OFFICE FURNITURE 154598 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $6.051.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154599 CERTIFIED APPLIANCE CO $51.04 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 154600 CHASE,ROTCHFORD,DRUKKER $3D.70 LEGAL SERVICES MO 12-14-94 154601 CLARKE CONTRACTING CO $62,957.83 CONSTRUCTION 7-142 154602 CLAYTON CONTROLS $107.97 LAB SUPPUES 154603 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $433.20 INSPECTION SERVICES 154604 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $708.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154605 COLEMAN/CASKEYARCHITECTS $64.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J-38.1 154606 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $452.96 LABSUPPLIES IMS07 COUCH&SONS $30.071.70 CONSTRUCTION M-D44 154608 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,247.75 PUMP PARTS 154609 COMPUTERS AMERICA $158.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154610 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4.454.36 ELECTRIC PARTS 154611 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $173.26 FREIGHT 154612 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $334.00 UTILITYTRUCK 154613 CONSUMER PIPE $22.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154614 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $62.06 TOOLS 154615 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC. $789.58 LAB SUPPUES 15016 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $7,526.27 ENGINE PARTS 154617 CORPORATE EXPRESS $387.34 PUBLICATIONS 154618 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $291.07 TRUCK PARTS 16019 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $102.25 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 15462D COUNTYCLERK $38.00 EXEMPTION FEES 154621 JOHN C.COX,JR. $539.71 EXPENSE REIMB. 154622 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $1,831.76 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154623 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $21,601.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 164624 CA UTILITIES EMERG ASSOC $1.000.00 MEMBERSHIP 154625 DAILY PILOT $48.00 NOTICES&ADS 154626 JAMES DARLINGTON $187.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 164627 DELL MARKETING L.P. $85.153.75 DESKTOP COMPUTERS 154628 DEZURICK ANDIOR CS CO. $4,834.71 VALVES 154629 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,710.08 PAINTSUPPLIES 164630 ENS RESOURCES INC $881.07 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IW31 ESP NORTH $183.49 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154632 EASTERN ELECTRIC $12,45027 TRANSFORMER INSTALLATION 154633 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $53.86 AUTO PARTS 154634 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $908.81 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154635 ELECTRA-BOND,INC. $619.66 SANDBLASTING SERVICES IW36 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 154637 EXECUTIVE EXCELLENCE $276.00 SUBSCRIPTION 154636 EP(THE EXECUTIVE PROGRAM) $43.82 PUBLICATIONS 154639 FLUIDTECH.SALES $34320 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/27M PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/02/96 POSTING DATE 10/02M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154640 FMC CORPORATION $171,172.72 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE MO 944-94 154641 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $95.35 AIR FREIGHT 154642 FILTER SUPPLY CO. S4,07SA1 FILTERS 154643 FIRST CHOICE $350.34 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 154644 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 00. $1.133.83 LAB SUPPLIES 154645 FLOSYMMS $5,868.42 PUMP PARTS 154646 FOLSOM LAKE FORD $21,636.04 TRUCK 154647 FORD SAUVAJOT MGMTGROUP $5,623.55 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 154648 FORKERT ENGINEERING&SURVEY $1.230.53 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 64-94 154649 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $13.31 PHOTO SUPPLIES 154650 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17.767.80 WATER USE 154651 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $766.46 PAINTSUPPLIES 154652 THE FOXBORO CO $889.28 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154653 FRANKLIN QUEST CO $53.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1646M FRY'S ELECTRONICS $2.622.91 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 154655 GET,INC. $4,731.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154656 THE GARTNER GROUP $34,500.00 RESEARCH ADVISORY SERVICES 154657 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $342.17 ELECTRIC PARTS 154658 GENERAL PETROLEUM $19,677.71 PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE 154659 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,834.49 TELEPHONE SERVICES 154660 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $209.13 PUMP PARTS 154661 N.GLANTZ&SON INC. $538.75 MISC.HARDWARE 154662 GOLDENWEST WINDOWS $1,058.00 WINDOW CLEANING 154663 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC $92.00 PUBLICATION 154664 WW GRAINGER,INC. $171.88 COMPRESSOR PARTS 154655 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $323.25 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 154666 GRASSY S.T.I. $2,089.67 ENGINE PARTS 154667 GREATAMERICAN PRINTING $3.220.49 PRINTING 154668 DGA CONSULTANTS $2.022.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6SS4 164669 GRIFFIN CARRICK $8.179.17 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHRE M.O.9-27-95 154670 HACH COMPANY $3,869.01 LAB SUPPLIES 154671 KEVIN HADDEN $574.28 EXPENSE REIMB. 154672 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $523.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154673 RE HART LABS INC $1,357.65 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154674 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 154675 HEWLETT PACKARD $327.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT 164676 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $180.00 REGISTRATION 154677 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $7,311.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 9-14-94 154678 HOME DEPOT $489.07 SMALL HARDWARE 1546M CHRISTINE K.HROUNTAS MD INC $200.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154680 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $30.92 PAINTSUPPLIES 154681 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,609.50 WATER USE 154652 IPCO SAFETY $4,816.86 SAFETY SUPPLIES 164683 ISCO,INC. $969.75 INSTRUMENT 154684 INFORMATION RESOURCES $125.00 PERSONNEL SERVICES 154685 INTEGRATED COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY $4,678.51 SOFTWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0927M PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/02196 POSTING DATE 10*2196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154656 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $64.26 WATER USE 164687 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $789.49 PRINTING 15468E JAMISON ENGINEERING $8,406.40 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 154689 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $611.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154690 DEEJASPARBASSOC $284.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154691 JAYS CATERING $376.44 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 164692 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $555.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 154693 FRANCES L.KALUZNY $910.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154694 KEITHLEY INSTRUMENTS,INC. $1,039.26 MISC.HARDWARE 154696 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $76,252.78 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09.27-95 154M KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $4.240.59 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.0.11-15-95 154697 KING BEARING,INC. $1,911.73 MACHINE SUPPLIES 154698 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5,147.37 TOOLS 154899 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 0O. $214.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES 164700 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $1,399.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 154701 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $4.849.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-40.2 164702 UEBERT CASSIDY B FRIERSON $2,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154703 UMSILETTER $99.00 SUBSCRIPTION 164704 LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $64.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 154705 MPS $383.45 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 154706 MANTEK $627.99 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 154707 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $90.61 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 15470E MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $1,081,9%.00 CONSTRUCTION P7-0&2 164709 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $72,046.80 CONSTRUCTION P141 164710 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $136.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154711 GREG MATHEWS $305.32 EXPENSE REIMB. 164712 MCCROMETER $316.23 METER PARTS 164713 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $113.16 EXPENSE REIMB. 164714 MCJUNKIN CORP $924.68 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 164715 WILLIAM M.MERCER INC $705.25 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154716 MESA MUFFLER 11205.49 AUTO PARTS 154717 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $12.649.69 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 154716 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $79.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154719 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,274.76 UNIFORM RENTALS 164720 MICHAEL D.MOORE $81.81 EXPENSE REIMB. 154721 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $113.20 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 154722 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION $90.00 PUBLICATION 154723 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $436.55 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154724 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $50.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154725 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $95.00 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 154726 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE $19,458.21 MEDICAL REIMB. 154727 OI CORPORATION $331.25 LAB SUPPLIES 154728 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $3,432.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154729 OLYMPIC CREATIONS $888.24 PINS 154730 ROBERT J.OOTEN $422.16 EXPENSE REIMB. 164731 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $25.00 MEETING EXPENSE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 09/27/96 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/0296 POSTING DATE 10102IN WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154732 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $9.153.67 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154733 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING 00. $3.114.38 FITTINGS 154734 OXYGEN SERVICE $681.42 SPECIALTY GASES 154735 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1,200.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 154736 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $410,667.49 REPLACEMENT WARRANT 154737 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $34.807.90 GAP WATER USE M.O.8.9.93 154738 PC MAGAZINE $26.97 SUBSCRIPTION 164739 P&D CONSULTANTS $1.476.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154740 PSSI $2.664.65 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 164741 PACIFIC BELL $1,285.03 TELEPHONE SERVICES 154742 PACIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS $1.850.00 CONTRACT SERVICES M03.27-96 154743 PAGENET $783.90 RENTALEQUIPMENT 154744 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $789.98 REIMB.PETTY CASH 154745 PIMA GRID SYSTEMS,INC. $128,416.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 154746 THE PLANNING REPORT $199.00 SUBSCRIPTION 154747 U.S.FILTER AND/OR $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 154748 POLYPURE,INC. $21,906.98 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92 164749 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $64.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 164750 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 154751 PUBLIC CONTRACTING IN CALIF. $395.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154752 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $2,071.10 FENCING INSTALLATION 154753 QUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $1,350.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 164754 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $397.98 ELECTRIC PARTS 154755 REAL TIME SYSTEMS COR $3,360.80 INTEGRATION SERVICES 164756 BOLT DELIVERY $02.40 FREIGHT 154767 REMEDYTEMP $1.574.52 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 154758 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $2,150.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 154759 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $1,439.77 PUMP PARTS 154760 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $75,495.01 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 154761 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $367.92 SPECIALTY GASES 154762 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $217.00 LAB REPAIRS 154763 SERPENTIX CONVEYOR CORP $3.270.87 MECHANICAL PARTS 154764 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $481.69 TOOLS 164765 SHASTA ELECTRIC $34.148.00 CONSTRUCTION J31-2 154766 SHURELUCK SALES $5,108.80 TOOLSHARDWARE 154797 SO COASTAIR QUALITY $27,500.50 PERMIT FEES 164788 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 LAB SUPPLIES 154769 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $22,820.53 NATURAL GAS 154770 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $880.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 154771 SPARKLE178 DRINKING WATER $11.001.46 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 154772 SUMMIT STEEL $243.72 METAL 164773 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTK)N) $721.93 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 154774 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $789,385.51 CONSTRUCTION P2353,P138-5,P246,P2-55 164775 SWRCB I AFRS $10,000.00 WASTE DISCHARGE FEES 154776 SYMCAS $5.177.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 154777 TCH ASSOCIATES $954.58 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0927/98 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10102M POSTING DATE 10/02/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154778 TRW SPACE B ELECTRONICS GR0UP $372.00 THERMOMETERS 164779 TEKMAR-DOHRMANN $3761 LAB SUPPLIES 154780 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD 54,848.78 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM 154781 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,239.53 MECHANICAL PARTS 154782 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 154783 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $244.35 LOCKS&KEYS 164784 EDWARD M.TORRES $250.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 164785 TRANSCAT $2,074,37 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154786 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3,722.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5.11-94 154787 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $25.81 TRUCK PARTS 164788 TRUESDAIL LABS $3,078,98 LAB SERVICES 154789 USC-TRG $295.00 REGISTRATION 154790 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $157.00 LAB SUPPLIES 154791 UNISOURCEMOR BUTLER PAPER $1,270.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154792 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $761.91 PARCEL SERVICES 164793 VWR SCIENTIFIC 52,500.23 LAB SUPPLIES 164794 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $532.44 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154795 VARIAN CHROMATOGRAPHY SYS $315.66 LAB SUPPLIES 154796 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1,657.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 154797 VISION ENVIRO SERVICES INC $3,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE J-11-1-A 154798 WATERS CORPORATION $69.23 SERVICE AGREEMENT 164799 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17,982.43 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8-23-95 154800 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $8,621.23 SODIUM HYPOCHL0RTTE M04124196 154801 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $886.09 MURIATICACID 154602 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $2,738.79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 154803 NANCY WHEATLEY $1,236.03 EXPENSE REIMB. 164804 WOODRUFF,SPRADUN S SMART $83,542.76 LEGAL SERVICES M07-26-95 154805 WOODWARD GOVERNOR CO $4,999.77 FIELD INVESTIGATION J33-1 154606 WORDPERFECT $27.97 SUBSCRIPTION 154807 WYATT DATA SERVICES $770.00 PUBLICATION 164MB XEROX CORP. $12,802.69 COPIER LEASES 154809 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $188.40 LAB SUPPLIES 154810 ZENON ENVIRONMENTAL INC $9,000.00 DEMONSTRATION EQUIPMENT 154811 ZYMARK CORP. $80A3 LAB EQUIPMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10102M $6,121,504.65 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE O9R7/96 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/02I98 POSTING DATE 10102198 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $105.00 #2 OPER FUND $2,343.81 #2 CAP FAC FUND $8,804.28 #3 OPER FUND $16.378.87 #3 CAP FAC FUND $11,220.02 #5 OPER FUND $1,163.12 #6 OPER FUND 545.00 #7 OPER FUND $5,355.76 #7 CAP FAC FUND $226,684.17 #11 OPER FUND $2,434.22 #14 OPER FUND $82.01 #566 OPER FUND $111.48 #888 CAP FAC FUND $844.00 #687 OPER FUND $213.74 #7814 OPER FUND $15.78 JT OPER FUND $783,414.37 CORP $2,303,031.20 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $103,717.29 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $555,530.53 $4, 221,504.65 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/16/96 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/16/96 POSTING DATE 10/i6196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 164867 ARK TECHNOLOGIES $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154868 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $2,521.27 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES ISMS AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $17.86 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154870 AWSI $235.W MEDICALTESTING 154871 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $267.31 HARDWARE 154872 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $998.51 DOOR REPAIRS 154873 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $981.82 SPECIALTY GASSES 154874 ALADDIN HOUSE $925.80 WINDOW BLINDS 154875 ALCO PRODUCTS INC $181.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154876 AMER SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGR $55.00 PUBLICATION 154877 AMERIDATA $5,050.24 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 159878 AMERICAN SIGMA $509.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 154879 AMSCO SCIENTIFIC $226.14 LAB SUPPLIES 154880 BLOKE P.ANDERSON $103.48 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 154881 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $215.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154882 AQUATIC BIASSAY&CONSULT $235.00 LAB SERVICES 154883 NICHOLAS ARHONTES $265.91 EXPENSE REIMB. 154684 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $9,278.72 WASTE REMOVAL 154885 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $380.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 154886 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $290.93 BUILDING MATERIALS 154887 AMSA $825.0D TRAINING REGISTRATION 154888 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $4,080.18 PAYROLL SERVICES 154689 AWARDS&TROPHIES $30.17 PLAQUES 164890 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $416.65 ROPE 164891 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $47.40 WASTE DISPOSAL 154892 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $270.00 LAB ANALYSIS 154893 BARNEBYSUTCLIFFE CORP. $16.511.11 FILTER MEDIA 154894 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,801.40 BATTERIES 154895 BEACH PAVING INC. $850.00 PAVING SERVICES 154896 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $34.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 154897 WT BILLARD $319.71 BUILDING REPAIRS 154898 BOOT BARN $182.86 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 154M BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $7.100.95 ENGINEERING SERVICES 154900 SRANDALL MODULAR CORP $61,460.00 INF0 TECH TRAILER M0424-96 154901 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $241.50 INSTRUMENT 1549M STEVE BURRILL $150.10 EXPENSE REIMB. 1549M BUSINESS ENTER.TRAINING SOLUTIONS $5,195.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154904 CEM CORPORATION $387.95 LAB SUPPLIES 154905 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS 154906 C.P.I. $1,567.22 LAB SUPPLIES 164907 CS COMPANY 52,261.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154908 CALTROL,INC. $648.38 HARDWARE 154909 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $178.08 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154910 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $519.50 MOVING SERVICES 154911 CAROLLO ENGINEERS $149,801.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 3-27-96.5-24-95.414-93 154912 DEON CARRICO $210.99 EXPENSE REIMB. FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10116/96 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10M6M POSTING DATE 10/iSM WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154013 CATAPULTING. $2.720.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154914 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $3,777.68 OFFICE FURNITURE 154915 CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 154916 GEORGE CHARETTE $100.95 EXPENSE REIMB. 154917 CHEMWEST INC $6.022.51 PUMP PARTS 154918 CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANTS $189.95 TRAINING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 154919 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $11.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 164920 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $24.52 LABSUPPLIES 154921 COUCH&SONS $11.090.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17.1 154922 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $31.205.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I0.25.95 154923 COMPUSERVE $310.05 COMPUTER SERVICES 154924 CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS $106.80 DOCUMENT DISPOSAL SERVICE 154925 CONNELL GM PARTS I DIV. $26.59 TRUCK PARTS 154925 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3.713.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 154227 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $2,783.51 PRINTING SERVICES 154928 CONSUMER PIPE $151.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154929 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $19.951.15 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11-93 154930 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $6,733.12 ENGINE PARTS 154931 COPELCO CAPITAL C/O IMAGE PLUS $1.432.00 COPIER LEASE 154932 CORPORATE EXPRESS Sn9.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154933 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $225.42 TRUCK PARTS 154934 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.865.24 ELECTRIC PARTS 164935 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $59.61 INSTRUMENTPARTS 154930 CAL STATE UNIT FULLERTON $1,185.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154937 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 5266.32 UNDERGROUND PETROLEUM STORAGE FEE 154938 J.W.IYANGELO CO,INC. $609.33 VALVES 154939 JAMES DARLINGTON $412.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154940 ALBERT W DAVIES INC $100.673.81 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R 154941 DE GUELLE&SONS GLASS CO 5255.72 SAFETY GLASS 154942 DELL MARKETING L.P. $20,192.52 DESKTOP COMPUTERS 154943 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $760.00 BIOSOLIDS ANALYSIS 154944 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $14,498.69 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN M.O.1-12-94 154945 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $1,64923 VALVES 164946 CARLA DILLON 5218.39 EXPENSE REIMB. 154947 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 154948 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $10223 PAINT SUPPLIES 164949 ESP NORTH $212.13 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 1549M J.D.EDWARDS $31,368.00 SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7-24-98 154951 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $170.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154952 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $8,140.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 164953 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 154954 DARRELL ENNIS $153.75 EXPENSE REIMB. 154955 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,872.00 LAB SERVICES 154956 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS DEVELOP $3.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154957 FASION FAIR CLEANERS 544.08 PERMIT CANCELLATION REFUND 15408 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $315.15 AIR FREIGHT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/16/96 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10116M POSTING DATE 10/16/98 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154959 FIRSTCHOICE $354.98 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 154960 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $2,052.63 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 154961 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $996.24 LAB SUPPLIES 154962 TIM FOLEY $204.51 EXPENSE REIMB. 154963 FORNACIARI CO $138.59 FILTERS 154964 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $136.81 PHOTO SUPPLIES 154965 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1.357.83 PAINT SUPPLIES 154966 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $921.67 ELECTRONIC&COMPUTER SUPPLIES 154967 CITYOFFULLERTON $298.39 WATER USE 154968 FURON 00. $426.39 CABLE 154969 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1.490.18 CHEMICALS 154970 THE GARTNER GROUP $425.61 SUBSCRIPTION 164971 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $315.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 164972 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.123.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1549M THE GRAMMAR GROUP $1,500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154974 GRASSYS.T.I. $2.314.11 ENGINE PARTS 154975 GRAYBAR $1,941.97 TOOLS 154976 GREATAMERICAN PRINTING $691.53 PRINTING 154M HBTYPE&GRAPHICS $4,442.07 PRINTING 154978 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.328.35 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154979 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $2.010.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 154980 PL HAWN CO,INC. $1,082.56 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 154981 MICHELLE HETHERINGTON $244.60 EXPENSE REIMB. 164982 HOME DEPOT $26.78 SMALL HARDWARE 164983 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.132.07 PAINTSUPPLIES 154984 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11,778.86 WATER USE 154985 HYDROTEX INC $1,532.15 AUTO SUPPLIES 154986 IPCO SAFETY $4,047.70 SAFETYSUPPLIES 154987 ISCO,INC. $4,633.25 INSTRUMENT 154988 INFORMATION RESOURCES $375.00 PERSONNEL SERVICES 154989 INSTITUTE&LAW $2,575.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 154990 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $747.14 BATTERIES 154991 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 164992 JAMISON ENGINEERING $1.783.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 154993 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $351.18 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154994 JAYS CATERING $979.93 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 154995 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $666.36 ELECTRIC PARTS 154996 MARK KAWAMOTO $229.35 EXPENSE REIMB. 154997 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $103.913.40 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9-27-95 164998 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $1.428.80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.O.11-15-95 154999 KING BEARING,INC. $531.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES 155000 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $438.24 TOOLS 155001 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE OO. $1.135.22 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 155002 LACABA $185.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING REGISTRATION 156003 LAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $5,055.03 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DISPOSAL 155004 LAW/CRANDAL,INC. $278.37 SOIL TESTING 7.13.94 FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 10116M PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1011&96 POSTING DATE 10116ft WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 155005 LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL $2.990.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 155M LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $12.334.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES 155007 LEWCO ELECTRIC $284.70 TRUCK PARTS IS5008 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $1,686.38 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12-9-90 1650D8 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO,INC. $387.90 UNIFORMS 166010 MPS $185.83 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 155011 MACOMCO $2.015.94 SERVICE AGREEMENT 165012 NSA $80.23 SENSOR BOARD REPAIR 155013 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $175.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155014 MIKE MASTERSON $229.75 EXPENSE REIMB. 155015 MIKE MCCARTHY $2D4.51 EXPENSE REIMB. M56016 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $744.66 EXPENSE REIMB. 155017 MCJUNKIN CORP $3,286.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155018 MESA MUFFLER $335.45 AUTO PARTS 155019 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.954.34 UNIFORM RENTALS 155020 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $4.262.00 AUDITING SERVICES MO 3-8-95 156021 MORTON SALT $868.52 SALT 155022 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $3.222.65 MEMBERSHIP 155023 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $703.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS 155024 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $742.71 LUBRICANTSIDIESEL FUEL 155025 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $2,779.10 FILTERS 155026 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $155.05 SAFETY GLASSES 155027 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION 1.029.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 155028 OFFICE PAVILIONSBNTERIOR RESOURCES $111.53 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIR$ 155029 ORANGE COUNTY WATER ASSOC. $240.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 165030 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $143.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155031 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $554.33 FIRINGS 155032 ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $735.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 155033 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.889.78 SPECIALTY CASES 166034 COUNTYOFORANGE $870.00 ROLL CHANGE PROCESSING FEE 155036 COUNTY OF ORANGE $101.00 PERMITS 155036 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $821.22 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155037 PACIFIC PARTS $10,985.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS 156038 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $99.60 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 15SD39 PACIFIC BELL $16.68 TELEPHONE SERVICES 155040 PANENERGY TRADING B MARKET $56.172.09 NATURAL GAS 155041 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $332.95 TIRES ISS042 PARTS UNLIMITED 5409.94 TRUCK PARTS 155043 PEOPLE SOFT,INC. $33.550.00 BID BOND REFUND 155044 PERMA SEAL $2,955.48 LUBE OIL 155045 PERSONAL STRENGTHS PUBL 5410.98 TRAINING MATERIALS 155046 ELAN PHARMA $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 155047 POLYPURE,INC. $27,942.56 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 155048 POLYSPEDE $201.46 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 155049 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $523.56 CHEMICALS 155050 PRENTICE HALL 549.82 PUBLICATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/16/95 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/16/98 POSTING DATE 10/16198 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 155051 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $192.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 155052 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $173.74 PUMP PARTS 155053 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $287.05 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 155054 R S 1 TRAINING.INC $900.00 TRAINING MATERIALS 155055 RAINBOW DISPOSAL OO. $2.002.72 TRASH REMOVAL 155056 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $215.47 LAB SUPPLIES 155057 RANCHO AUTO WASH INC $427.50 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 156058 BOLT DELIVERY $158.65 FREIGHT 155059 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $279.63 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 15WBO THE REGISTER $1,736.80 NOTICES B ADS 155081 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $400.00 OCEAN MONITORING 155082 REMEDYTEMP $21,018.10 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 155083 RUPES-KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $1,051.21 PUMP PARTS 155064 SKC WEST $874.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES 155065 ST.SENA CONVALESCENT CENTER $839.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 155066 SCHERING-PLOUGH $64.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES 155067 SCHWIND AMERICA,INC. $3,998.10 PUMP PARTS 155088 CRY OF SEAL BEACH $148.10 WATER USE 155069 STUART SEVERN $183.18 EXPENSE REIMB. 165070 SHURELUCKSALES $5,309.30 TOOLSMARDWARE 165071 MIKE SILBERMANN COMPANY $3,015.93 SEWER REPAIRS 165072 MELINDA SILVERMAN,PHD $125.00 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING SERVICES 155073 SKILL PATH SEMINARS $464.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 155074 SMITH-EMERYCO. $2,824.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 155075 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $169.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155076 SOUTH COAST WATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES 155077 SO CALIF EDISON CO $7,227.36 POWER 155078 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $2,758.18 NATURAL GAS 155079 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $11,669.88 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 155080 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $250.00 METER 156081 STANDARD BURP B EQUIP CO $136.16 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155082 STERLINGART $246.31 ART SUPPLIES 155083 SUMMITSTEEL $1,008.54 METAL 155084 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $538.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 155085 SWRCB/AFRS $400.00 ANNUAL WASTE DISCHARGE FEE 155086 TARRY OF DELAWARE INC $1,243.00 PUMP PARTS 155087 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $333.97 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 165088 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $61.26 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 165069 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2.296.75 MECHANICAL PARTS 155080 TIME MOTION TOOLS $125.21 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155091 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $1,000.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 155092 MARKTOMKO $269.19 EXPENSE REIMB. 155M TRUESDAIL LABS $500.00 LAB SERVICES 165M JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $925.21 INSTRUMENT PARTS 155095 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $31.89 PARCEL SERVICES 155M VWR SCIENTIFIC $5,980.52 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/16/96 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10116M POSTING DATE 10/16196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 155097 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3,907.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155098 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $1.762.87 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155099 TED VITKO $216.39 EXPENSE REIMB. 155100 WACKENHUTCORP. $13,392.62 CONTRACT SERVIC&SECURITY GUARDS 155101 GUY L WARDEN B SONS $165.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155102 KH.WATTS CO $90.48 FILTERS 155103 WESTERN FEDERAL INC $679.32 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 155104 WESTERN METRO UNIT $623.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155105 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $15,127.11 CAUSTIC SODA MO 8.23-95 155106 WESTERN TAP MANUFACTURING $163.34 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155107 WEST-LRE SUPPLY CO. $875.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 155108 WESCO $1,093.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155109 JUDITH A.WILSON $79.44 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 155110 JAMES WYBENGA $196.95 EXPENSE REIMB.. 155111 XEROX CORP. $128.50 COPIER LEASES 155112 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $230.30 LAB SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/1696 $1.071,467.37 SUMMARY AMOUNT 91 OPER FUND $386.70 #2 OPER FUND $1.402.99 #3 OPER FUND $9,125.26 03 CAP FAC FUND $128.355.52 #5 OPER FUND $221.23 #6OPER FUND $163.80 #7 OPER FUND $3,560.85 #11 OPER FUND $7,394.31 #11 CAP FAC FUND $11,101.97 013 OPER FUND $39.30 JT OPER FUND $431,629.89 CORF $298.210.03 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $14.496.69 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $165,398.83 $1,071.487.37 FUNDNO 9199 - JTDISTWORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE -VARIOUS PAGE1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 10/10/96 154866 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $1,032.36 PETTY CASH REIMB. 10/10/96 155113 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN&SMART $45.000.00 LEGAL SERVICES 1028/96 155396 ANDY C.PATTERSON,ADMNSTR OF $10.000.00 REPLACEMENT WARRANT Imam 155397 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,529.70 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON 1029M6 155398 CWEA $650.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1029/96 155399 LORI COLAMONICO $631.00 DEDUCTION WARRANT REPLACEMENT 1029195 155400 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN&SMART $28,814.21 LEGAL SERVICES 10/31/98 155401 AMSA $275.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 10/31/96 155402 EDWARD M.TORRES $250.00 CASH ADVANCE 11/07/96 155637 INGRID HELLEBRAND $151.58 EXPENSE REIMB. 11/07/96 155M CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $963.56 PETTY CASH REIMB. 11/07/96 155639 WOODRUFF,SPRADUN&SMART $104,959.11 LEGAL SERVICES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID $196,256.52 SUMMARY AMOUNT JT OPER FUND $179,773.72 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $10,000.00 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $6,482.80 8196.256.52 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1996 �\OaO�gTRICTS 0FO9gy � G Z � � a �`cCl/pTMH E ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 of Orange County,California,was held on November 20, 1996,at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos.1, 2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13,and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: _I_ Pat McGuigan,Chair Ted R.Moreno x James M. Ferryman,Chair pro tam _ Arthur Perry _X__ Mark A. Murphy Joanne Coonts x Thomas R.Saltarelli Jim Potts __X_ Roger Stanton William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: x Norman Z. Eckenrode,Chair Carol Downey Daniel T.Welch,Chair pro tam John M.Gullbdaon • John Collins George Scott • Barry Denes Bob Bell • Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker • James H.Flora Steve Anderson • Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno • Mark A Murphy Joanne Countz • Chris Norby Don Bankhead • Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket • Roger Stanton William G.Steiner $ Bob Zama[ Tom Day DISTRICT NO.3: _a_ Sal A Sapien,Chair _ Harry M.Dotson �•L_ Sheldon Singer,Chair pro tam _ George L Zlaket • Waiter Bowman Gail Kerry • George Brown _ Mariyn Bruce Hastings John Collins _ George Scott • Burnie Dunlap _ Glenn Parker • James H.Flora Steve Anderson • Don R.Griffin Patsy Marshall • _ Victor Leipzig Ralph Bauer • Wally Linn Eva G.Miner • Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno • Chris Norby Don Bankhead Margie L. Rice James V. Evans x Roger Stanton William G.Steiner x_ Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom .._i_ Bob Zonal Tom Daly DISTRICT NO. 5: _ x Jan Debay,Chair John C.Cox,Jr. William G.Steiner,Chair pro tam x Roger Stanton John C.Cox,Jr. x Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.6: x James M.Ferryman,Chair _ Arthur Perry x Jan Debay,Chair pro tam John C.Cox,Jr. William G.Steiner X Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: __X_ Barry Hammond,Chair _ Mike Ward x Thomas R.Sakarelli,Chair pro tam _ Jim Potts Jan Debay _ John C.Cox,Jr. x James M. Ferryman _ Arthur Perry x Pat McGuigan Ted R.Moreno �x Mark A.Murphy _ Joanne Coontz William G.Steiner x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: x Victor Leipzig,Chair _ Ralph Bauer X Shirley Dettloff,Chair pro tam Ralph Bauer x Roger Stanton _ William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: John M.Gulloson,Chair x Daniel T.Welch a Bob Zonal _ Tom Day _x Burnie Dunlap,Chair pro tam Glenn Parker x Mark A Murphy _ Joanne Coontz William G.Steiner x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Thomas R.Saltarelli,Chair Jim Polls Mark A Murphy,Chair pro tam Joanne Coonlz x Barry Hammond Mike Ward William G.Steiner If Roger Stanton Peer A Swan Darryl Miller -2- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Don F. McIntyre, General Manager, Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager- Operations, Judith A. Wilson, Assistant General Manager-Administration, Penny Kyle, Board Secretary, Marc Dubois, Janet Gray, Irwin Haycock, Ed Hodges, Patricia Jonk, John Linder, Mike Moore, Bob Dolan, Mike Peterman, Doug Stewart, Gary Streed, Michelle Tuchman, Nancy Wheatley OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Jim Coleman, William G. Knopf DISTRICT 13 A000intment of Chair pro tem In the absence of Chair John M. Gullixson and Chair pro tem Bob Zemel, Director Burnie Dunlap was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 13. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ryal Wheeler, an employee of the Districts, spoke regarding the contents of a report prepared by Jim Coleman of Confidential Management Services, Inc. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR DIRECTOR FRED BARRERA (All Districts) MOTION, Adopt Resolution No. 96-86 commending Director Fred Barrens for his contributions to the Districts during his tenure as Director. -3- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIR The Joint Chair announced the following tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Ad Hoc Committee re Strategic Plan - Thursday, December 5, at 5:00 P.M. Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee - Wednesday, December 11, at 5:30 p.m. Steering Committee - Wednesday, December 18, at 5:30 p.m. Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee - Wednesday, January 8, at 5:30 p.m. (No meeting scheduled for December) Planning, Design, and Construction Committee -Thursday, January 9, at 5:30 p.m. (No meeting scheduled for December) The upcoming holidays for which the Districts' office will be closed will be November 28 and 29 (Thanksgiving), December 24 and 25 (Christmas), and January 1, 1997. The Joint Chairman invited departing and continuing directors, executive management, and Board Secretary staff to a reception that he would be hosting at Chevy's on December 18th immediately following the joint boards meeting that date. The Joint Chairman advised of an orientation for new board members which has been scheduled for Saturday, January 18, 1997. Returning Directors were also invited to attend. He advised that his policy would be to permit Directors to serve on committees only if they have attended a Directors' orientation session. John Collins then reported that he had addressed the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) on November 6 and recommended that they not initiate a consolidation of the Districts. He stated that special legislation appears to be the best option, and LAFCO had agreed not to initiate consolidation at this time as long as progress was made with respect to providing new Directors with an orientation and developing language for a bill. -4- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 APPROVAL OF MINUTES (All Districts) There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 23, 1996, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF JOINT AND INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CLAIMS (All Districts) MOTION: Ratify payment of Joint and Individual District claims set forth on exhibits "A" , "B", and "C", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below: ALL DISTRICTS 10/02/96 10/16/96 misc. Joint Operating Fund - $783,414.37 $431,629.89 $179,773.72 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 2,303,031.20 298,210.03 0.00 Joint Working Capital Fund - 655,530.53 165,398.83 6,482.80 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 103,717.29 14,496.69 10,000.00 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 105.00 386.70 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 11,148.09 1,402.99 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 27,598.89 137,480.78 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 1,163.12 221.23 0.00 pISTRICT NO. 6 - 45.00 163.80 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 232,049.93 3,560.85 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 2,434.22 18,496.28 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 39.30 0.00 DISTRICT NO 14 - 82.01 0.00 0.00 pISTRICT NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 955.48 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 213.74 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 15.78 0 00 0.00 $4.121.504. 55 $1,071487.37 $196.256.52 CLAIM OF J. D. LINCOLN FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY LOSS RE BAYSIDE DRIVE SEWAGE SPILL (All Districts) MOTION: 1) Refuse to accept the claim for Personal Property Loss and take no action to approve or deny based on being untimely; 2) Deny the claim for Real Property Loss; and 3) Refer to General Counsel and Claims Administrator. -5- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by John Collins, Chair of Steering Committee, re the November 20, 1996 meeting. MOTION: Receive and file draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 23, 1996. DRAFT OPERATIONS. MAINTENANCE. AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Pat McGuigan, Chair of Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee, re November 6, 1996 Meeting MOTION: Receive and file draft Operations, Maintenance, and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 6, 1996. SPECIFICATION NO. P-157 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (OMTS96-024) (All Districts): The Technical Services Department requests approval of: 1) A Biosolids Management Agreement with Tule Ranch/Magan Farms providing for the transportation and management of approximately 1,000 wet tons of biosolids per week; 2) Demonstration Project Agreement with Waste Conversion Industries, Inc. to transport, manage, and chemically convert approximately 200 wet tons of biosolids per week; and 3) Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of Districts' Residual Solids with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. decreasing the cost from $21.92 - $28.00 to $20.57 - $28.00 per wet ton, depending upon the amount of biosolids transported. Mike Moore, Director of Environmental Compliance and Monitoring, addressed the board on this matter. -6- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 MOTION: 1) Approve an Agreement with Tule Ranch/Magan Farms for a five-year period to be effective December 2, 1996 through December 1, 2001, for a cost of$19.85 to $25.00 per wet ton according to the technology utilized (estimated annual amount of $655,000.00); 2) Approve Demonstration Project Agreement with Waste Conversion Industries, Inc. for a one year period to be effective December 2, 1996 through December 1, 1997, for a cost of$17.00 per wet ton (estimated annual amount of $170,000.00); and 3) Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of Districts' Residual Solids with Pima Gro Systems, Inc. decreasing the cost from $21.92 - $28.00 to $20.57 - $28.00 per wet ton, depending upon the amount of biosolids transported; and 4) Report back to the Boards of Directors in three months and quarterly thereafter. Directors James Ferryman, Barry Hammond, and Margie Rice stated their objection on this matter for the record. PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF SCREENINGS COMPACTOR EQUIPMENT (SPECIFICATION NO. E-270) (OMTS95-026) (All Districts): The Operations and Maintenance Department requests that the FSM Screenings Compactor Test Report prepared by staff be received and filed and that staff be authorized to proceed with the purchase and installation of screenings compactor equipment. MOTION: 1) Receive and file FSM Screenings Compactor Test Report; and 2) Authorize staff to proceed with the Purchase and Installation of Screenings Compactor Equipment at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 (Specification No. E-270), in an amount not to exceed $150,000.00. FUNDING OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH FOUNDATION (WERF) TO PERFORM WASTEWATER AND WATER QUALITY RESEARCH TO ADVANCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE WASTEWATER INDUSTRY (OMTS96-022)_(All Districts MOTION Authorize the budgeted funding for the WERF's Wastewater and Water Quality Research subscription from December 1, 1996 through November 30, 1997, in the amount of$63,250.00. -7- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 DRAFT PLANNING. DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts), A verbal report was presented by Sheldon Singer, Chair of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee, re the November 7, 1996, meeting. MOTION, Receive and file draft Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 7, 1996. ADDENDUM NO, 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAMP DRESSER AND MCKEE, INC. FOR JOB NOS, J-40-1 AND J-40-2 RE PREPARATION OF PHASE I OF STRATEGIC PLAN (PDC96-054) (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests approval of Addendum No. 1 to the PSA providing for added public involvements for Project Nos. 2 and 3 of the first phase of the Strategic Plan (Management of Peak Hydraulic Discharge, Job No. J-40-1 and Determination of Financial Charges and Fee Schedules, Job No. J-40-2). MOTION: Approve Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Camp Dresser and McKee, Inc. in the amount of$138,985.00 for a total amount not to exceed $1,534,625.00. Directors Walter Bowman, Don R. Griffin, Wally Linn, Margie Rice, and Daniel T. Welch stated their objection on this matter for the record. JOB NO, J-34-1. OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES AND JOB NO, P2-35-5 PHASE 2 SITE AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2 (PDC96-055) (All Districts)7 The Director of Engineering requests that a construction contract be awarded to Advanco Constructors to rebuild an ocean outfall surge tower, landscape adjacent areas, and perform other miscellaneous work. MOTION: 1) Receive and file Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications, adding minor work; increasing the contract time from 550 to 730 calendar days; adding new construction scheduling requirements and changing the date for receipt of bids from October 7 to October 15, 1996; 2) Receive and file bid tabulation; and 3) Award contract for Job No. J-34-1, Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, and Job No. P2-35-5, Phase 2 Site and Security Improvements at Plant No. 2 to Advanco Constructors for construction of said project in the total amount of$7,122,693.00. -8- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 JOB NO. J-11-2 RESTORATION OF OLD LABORATORY FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT (PDC96-057) (All Districts): The Director of Engineering requests an increase in authorized funds of$101,000.00, bringing the project total to $525,000.00 to cover all anticipated costs required to complete the project. MOTION' Authorize additional funds of$101,000.00 for a project total of$525,000.00 for the Restoration of Old Laboratory for Human Resources Department. Directors Walter Bowman and Don R. Griffin stated their objection on this matter for the record. ADDENDUM NO 4 TO MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO 1 JOB NO P1-40-1. AND MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P247-1 (PDC96-058) (All Districts): The Engineering Department and the Director of Engineering request that the Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., be amended providing for additional engineering services for design changes. MOTION: Approve Addendum No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement with Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the amount of$244,277.00 for a total amount not to exceed $1,492,244.00. DRAFT FINANCE ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES (All Districts): A verbal report was presented by Director George Brown, Chair of the Finance, Administration, and Human Resources Committee, re November 13, 1996, meeting. MOTION: Receive and file draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held November 13, 1996. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1996 (FAHR96-064) (All Districts MOT MOTIOM Receive and file Treasurers Report for the month of October 1996. -9- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PURCHASING SYSTEM AND POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES. SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 86-81 (FAHR96-066) (All Districts) The Contracts/Purchasing Manager and General Counsel recommend the adoption of a new Purchasing Resolution to streamline processes, reduce expenditures and provide increased staff efficiency. MOTION: Adopt Purchasing Resolution No. 96-87 repealing Resolution No. 86-81. SELECTION OF DISTRICTS' COMMERCIAL BANK (FAHR96-068) (All Districts) MOTION: Approve the selection of Union Bank of California to serve as the Districts' commercial bank for a three (3) year period commencing on January 1, 1997, with the Districts' option to renew for an additional two (2) years thereafter. RECEIVE FILE AND APPROVE THE DISTRICTS' COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30. 1996 PREPARED BY STAFF AND AUDITED BY MORELAND AND ASSOCIATES. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (FAHR96-0691 (All Districts) MOTION: Receive, file, and approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1996. RECEIVE AND FILE THE 1996-1997 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL REPORT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30. 1996 (FAHR96-070)(All Districts) MOTION: Receive and file the 1996-1997 Financial and Operational Report for the First Quarter Ended September 30, 1996. -10- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 REVISED SAWPA CONTINUING GUARANTY AGREEMENT (All Districts) The Joint Chair advised that due to two member agencies removing this item from their calendars, he would be revising the recommended action. The Joint Chair advised that he had met with director representatives of SAWPA and two member agencies and had reached an agreement in principle which had been set forth in the November 5, 1996 version of the Continuing Guaranty, which was on the agenda this date. Due to two agencies removing this item from their calendars without action, the Joint Chair recommended that no action be taken on the agreement, and that correspondence to SAWPA and its members be prepared to inform them of the Districts' position. MOTION: Direct the Joint Chair to prepare a letter requesting that an accord be reached by December 31, 1996 or the Districts would simply rely on the 1972 Agreement. VERBAL REPORT BY JIM COLEMAN, CONFIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. Jim Coleman, Confidential Management Services, Inc., presented a verbal report on his observations and assessments of the Districts' corporate culture. APPROVE WAIVER OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST RE PILLSBURY. MADISON & SUTRO. COUNSEL FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL (All Districts) Mr. Woodruff, General Counsel, stated that pursuant to his memorandum dated November 20, 1996, he would recommend execution of the waiver. MOTION; 1) Find that the matter arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2); 2) Approve waiver of potential conflict of interest re Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Counsel for the Orange County Investment Pool. -11- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 GENERAL COUNSEL'S COMMENTS PRIOR TO CLOSED SESSION (All Districts): General Counsel reported to the Directors the need for a Closed Session as authorized by Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss and consider the item specified as Item No. 22(a)(2) on the published agenda. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956(B)(2) (All Districts): The Boards convened in closed session at 9:21 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No action was taken re Agenda Item No. 22(a)(2). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION (All Districts): At 9:40 p.m., the Boards reconvened in regular session. ADOPT FINDINGS AND AFFIRM DECISION RE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OF PORTER PLATING COMPANY. INC. AND JERRY PORTER (District No. 2) IN QLION7 Adopt findings and affirm decision re Administrative Appeal of Porter Plating Company, Inc. and Jerry Porter. ORDER ANNEXATION NO 75 - BOWLER ANNEXATION (District No. 2): The Director of Engineering requests approval to order annexation of 0.57 acres of territory in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Mohler Drive in the City of Anaheim. M TI N7 Adopt Resolution No. 96-89-2 ordering Annexation No. 75 - Bowler Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2. -12- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 THIRD MODIFICATION OF SEWER EASEMENT WITH UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (District No. 2): The Director of Engineering requests approval for the third modification to the easement for the Fullerton-Brea Purchase Sewer and the Fullerton- Brea Intercepter Sewer, Contract No. 2-25, relocating a portion of the easement around the portion of the trunk sewers found to be outside of the existing easement in the Coyote Hills Golf Course in Fullerton. MOTION: Authorize execution of the Third Modification of Sewer Easement provided by Union Oil Company of California for the relocation of a portion of the original easement around a portion of the Fullerton-Brea Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 2-25, found not to be within the existing easement, at no cost to the District. CHANGE ORDER NO, 1 TO PURCHASE ORDER NO. 62459 DATED JUNE 10, 1993, WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (Districts Nos. 3 & 11): The Director of Engineering requests approval of Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 62459, re Relocation of Gas Mains to accommodate construction of Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1, increasing the Purchase Order amount by $35,500.00 for a total amount not to exceed $99,500.00. MOTION: Approve Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 62459, issued to Southern California Gas Company, for an addition of$35,500.00, increasing the total contract amount to $99,500.00. QUITCLAIM EASEMENT ON LAND CONTAINING PORTIONS OF THE FORMER CORONA DEL MAR PUMP STATION (District No. 5): The Director of Engineering requests quitclaiming an existing easement to Auto Spa of Corona Del Mar, Inc., new landowner. MOTION: Authorize the General Manager to approve and execute the Quitclaim Deed. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO, 4 TO CONTRACT NO. 5-37-3 WITH WAL-CON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER PHASE 3 (PDC95-0521 (Districts 5 & 6)7 The Construction Manager and Director of Engineering request approval of Change Order No. 4, providing for ten items of additional work and granting a time extension of 58 calendar days for completion of the additional work. MOTION7 Approve Change Order No. 4 to Contract No. 5-37-3 with Wal-Con Construction Company for an addition of$204,943.00 and 58 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $2,645,401.03. -13- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Minutes 11/20/96 ADJOURNMENTS (All Districts): The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. I Secretary o In Boa(r s of Directors of County Sam ion tricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 -14- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE DS/27/98 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/02J98 POSTING DATE 1D/M6 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154548 AEES PUBLICATIONS $174.00 PUBLICATION 154549 ATB T-MEGACOM SERVICE $257.42 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154550 AT&T-PROWATTS $939.44 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154551 ATB T-CELLULAR CR BR $0.21 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154552 AT&T-CELLULAR OR BR $6.39 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154553 ABATIX ENVIRONMENTAL $338.34 MISC.HARDWARE 154554 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $117.75 DOOR REPAIRS 154555 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $622.45 SPECIALTY GASSES 15455E AIR PHOTO SERVICES $1,129.23 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 154557 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $162.47 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154558 AMERICAN AIRLINES $5.099.95 TRAVEL SERVICES 154559 AMERICAN BUILDING 843A3 SUBSCRIPTION 154580 AMERICAN SIGMA $10.574.72 CONTROLLER SAMPLER 154561 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS INC. $892.44 LAB SUPPLIES 154562 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $150.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154563 AQUATIC BIOASSAY&CONSULT $1.630.00 LAB SERVICES 154564 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $120.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL m 154565 ATKINUONES COMPUTER SER.INC. $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT k 154566 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $3.879.00 WIRE ROPE 154567 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $810.00 LAB ANALYSIS 164568 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3.529.70 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON y 154569 BANANA BLUEPRINT $619.85 PRINTING MO 11-07-94 154570 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $327.58 BATTERIES Y 154571 BAUER COMPRESSOR $166.25 COMPRESSOR PARTS 154572 010-GRO DIVISION $70,751.47 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 4-26-95 154573 BLACK&VEATCH $846.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES P7<6,P2-55 154574 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,994.21 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.Q. 14-93 154575 BRA COMMUNICATIONS,INC. 915.00 FREIGHT 154576 BOILER B COMBUSTION $890.00 REGISTRATION 154577 SOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $258.60 TRUCK REPAIRS 154578 BOOTIIARN $96.87 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 154579 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.816.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES MO 1-12-94 154580 BURLINGTON SAFETY LAB INC. $126.00 TESTING SERVICES 154581 BUSH B ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,316.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.641-94 154582 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS 154583 CRC PRESS,INC. $112.70 PUBLICATION 154584 CS COMPANY $16,405.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154585 CALFON CONSTRUCTION $163,726.34 CONSTRUCTION 7.22,7.24 154586 CALTROL,INC. $137.21 HARDWARE 154587 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $373.37 TRUCK BODY REPAIR 154588 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $112.24 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154589 CALIF CENTRIFUGAL PUMP $5.110.00 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154590 CALIF.DEBT ADVISORY $12&00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 154591 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTIC $425.00 DIRECT&OVERLAPPING DEBT STATEMENT 154592 CALIF RELOCATION SERVICES $763.50 MOVING SERVICES 154593 CAMP DRESSER&MC KEY INC $110,113.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J40-1,J40.2 FUND NO 9199 IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 0927N6 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/02/96 POSTING DATE 10/0219B WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154594 CAPIO $125.00 MEMBERSHIP 154595 PATRICK CARNAHAN 5250.00 EXPENSE REIMB. 154595 CARTER-AMER.FLEET SERVICE $171.00 AUTO PARTS IM597 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. SSBIL02 OFFICE FURNITURE 154598 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $6,051.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154599 CERTIFIED APPLIANCE CO $51.04 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1646W CHASE,ROTCHFORD,DRUNKER $30.70 LEGAL SERVICES MO 12-14.94 154601 CLARKE CONTRACTING CO $52.957.83 CONSTRUCTION 7-14-2 154602 CLAYTON CONTROLS $107.97 LAB SUPPLIES 154603 CLAYTON ENVIRO CONSULT $433.20 INSPECTION SERVICES 154604 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $708.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154605 COLEMAN/CASKEY ARCHITECTS $84.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J-38.1 154606 COLS-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $452.95 LAB SUPPLIES 154607 COUCH&SONS S3Q971.70 CONSTRUCTION M-0" ISMS COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,247.76 PUMP PARTS 154609 COMPUTERS AMERICA $155.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154510 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4,464.36 ELECTRIC PARTS m 154611 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $173,26 FREIGHT y 154612 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $33400 UTILITY TRUCK �+ 154613 CONSUMER PIPE $22.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r 154614 CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT&SUPPLY $62.08 TOOLS y 154615 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS INC. $789.58 LAB SUPPLIES > 154616 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $7,526.27 ENGINE PARTS 154617 CORPORATE EXPRESS $387.34 PUBLICATIONS ro 154618 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $291.07 TRUCK PARTS 154619 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $102.25 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 164620 COUNTY CLERK $38.00 EXEMPTION FEES 154621 JOHN C.COX,JR. $539.71 EXPENSE REIMB. 154622 CHARLES P.CROWLEY,CO. $1,931.76 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154623 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $21,601.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE IM624 CA UTILITIES EMERG ASSOC $1,000.00 MEMBERSHIP 154625 DAILY PILOT 548.00 NOTICES&ADS 154626 JAMES DARLINGTON $187.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154627 DELL MARKETING L.P. $85.163.75 DESKTOP COMPUTERS 154628 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. 54.11U.71 VALVES 154629 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $1,710.08 PAINT SUPPLIES 154630 ENS RESOURCES INC $881.07 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154631 ESP NORTH $183.49 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154632 EASTERN ELECTRIC $12,450.27 TRANSFORMER INSTALLATION 154633 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT 553.86 AUTO PARTS 154634 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $908.81 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154635 ELECTRA80ND,INC. $619.56 SANDBLASTING SERVICES 154636 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,500.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5.24-95 164637 EXECUTIVE EXCELLENCE $276.00 SUBSCRIPTION 154638 EP(THE EXECUTIVE PROGRAM) $43.82 PUBLICATIONS 154639 FLUID TECH.SALES 5343.20 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 09R719fi PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10102M POSTING DATE 10N2/88 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154640 FMC CORPORATION $171.172.72 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE NO 9-14-94 154641 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $95.35 AIR FREIGHT 154642 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $4,075.41 FILTERS 154643 FIRSTCHOICE $350.34 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 154644 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,133.83 LAB SUPPLIES 154645 FLOSYSTEMS $5.868.42 PUMP PARTS 154646 FOLSOM LAKE FORD $21,638.04 TRUCK 154647 FORD SAUVAIOT MGMT GROUP $5,623.55 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES 154648 FORKERT ENGINEERING B SURVEY $1.230.53 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO 6-8-94 154649 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $13.31 PHOTO SUPPLIES 154650 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $17,767.80 WATER USE 154651 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $766.46 PAINT SUPPLIES 154652 THE FOXBORO CO $889.28 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154653 FRANKLINQUESTCO $53.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154654 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $2,622AI ELECTRONIC 8 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 154655 CST,INC. $4.731.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 164656 THEGARTNERGROUP $34.500.00 RESEARCH ADVISORY SERVICES 154657 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $342.17 ELECTRIC PARTS x 154658 GENERAL PETROLEUM $19,677.71 PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINE S r+ 154660 GENERALRLICH- ITCHEL ,INC. $$209.13 TELPUMP HONE SERVICES IMS61 N.GLANTZ& C N INC. C. $538.75 PUMP PARTS y 154661 N.GLAN W$SON INC. E658.00 MISC.WIND HARDWARE 154663 GOVERNMENT WINDOWS E1,$92.00 WINDOW CLEANING 154663 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC E92.00 PUBLICATION w 154664 W W GRAINGER,INC. $171.88 COMPRESSOR PARTS 154665 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $323.25 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 154666 GRASBYS.T.I. $2.089.57 ENGINE PARTS 154667 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $3.220.49 PRINTING 154666 DGA CONSULTANTS $2.022.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.G.5-94 154669 GRIFFIN CARRICK $6,179.17 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHRE M.O.9.27-95 154670 HACH COMPANY $3,869.01 LAB SUPPLIES 154671 KEVIN HARDEN $574.28 EXPENSE REIMB. 154672 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $523.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154673 R E HART LASS INC $1.357.65 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154674 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 154675 HEWLETT PACKARD $327.58 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154676 HIGH-POINT RENDEL $180.00 REGISTRATION 154677 HOLMES 8 NARVER,INC. $7.311.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 9.14-94 154678 HOME DEPOT $489.07 SMALL HARDWARE 154679 CHRISTINE K.HROUNTAS MD INC $200.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154680 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $30.92 PAINT SUPPLIES 154681 CRY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,6D9.50 WATER USE 154682 IPCO SAFETY $4,816.86 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154683 ISCO,INC. $969.75 INSTRUMENT 154684 INFORMATION RESOURCES $125.00 PERSONNEL SERVICES 154685 INTEGRATED COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY $4.670.51 SOFTWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0927I96 PAGE4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10102NO POSTING DATE 10N2/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154686 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $64.26 WATER USE 154687 J2 PRINTING SERVICES E78949 PRINTING 154688 JAMISON ENGINEERING - E8,406.40 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 154689 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $811.57 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES IM690 DEE JASPAR 8 ASSOC $28420 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154691 JAYS CATERING $376.44 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 154692 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $555.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 154693 FRANCES L.KALU2NY $910.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154694 KEITHLEY INSTRUMENTS,INC. $1.039.26 MISC.HARDWARE 154695 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $76252.78 FERRIC CHLORIDE M09.27-95 154696 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $4.240.59 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.O.11-16-95 154697 KING BEARING,INC. $1.911.73 MACHINE SUPPLIES IM698 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5,147.37 TOOLS 1546N LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $214.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES 154700 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $1.399.00 SOIL TESTING 7-13-94 154701 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $4,649.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140.2 154702 LIEBERT CASSIDY B FRIERSON $2,500.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES m 154703 LIMSA.ETTER $99.00 SUBSCRIPTION X 154704 LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $64.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 5 154705 MPS $393AS PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 154706 MANTEK $627.99 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES y 154707 MARDEN SUSCO INC. $90.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154708 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $1.081,996.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-36-2 Y 154709 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $72,046.80 CONSTRUCTION P141 i. 154710 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $136.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154711 GREG MATHEWS $305.32 EXPENSE REIMB. 154712 MCCROMETER $316.23 METER PARTS 154713 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $113.16 EXPENSE REIMB. 154714 MCJUNKIN CORP $924.68 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154715 WILLIAM M.MERCER INC $705.25 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154716 MESA MUFFLER $205.49 AUTO PARTS 154717 MIDWAY MFG.8 MACHINING $12,649.69 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 154718 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $79.17 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 164719 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,274.76 UNIFORM RENTALS 164720 MICHAEL D.MOORE $81.81 EXPENSE REIMB, 154721 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $113.20 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 154722 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION $90.00 PUBLICATION 154723 NEALSUPPLYCO. $436.55 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154724 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $50.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154725 NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE $95.00 MAIL DELIVERY SERVICE 154726 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE $19,458.21 MEDICAL REIMB. 154727 OI CORPORATION $331.25 LAB SUPPLIES 154728 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION $3,432.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154729 OLYMPIC CREATIONS $888.24 PINS 154730 ROBERT J.OOTEN $422.16 EXPENSE REIMB. 154731 THE ORANGE COUNTY FORUM $25.00 MEETING EXPENSE - FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 09/2796 PAGES - REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1010296 POSTING DATE 10/02/96 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 164732 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $9.153.67 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 154M ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $3,114.38 FITTINGS 154734 OXYGEN SERVICE $681.42 SPECIALTY GASES 154735 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1,200.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 154736 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $410.667.49 REPLACEMENT WARRANT 154737 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $34,007.90 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9A3 154738 PC MAGAZINE $26.97 SUBSCRIPTION 154739 P&D CONSULTANTS $1,476.10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154740 PSSI $2,654.55 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 154741 PACIFIC BELL $1,285.03 TELEPHONE SERVICES 154742 PACIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS $1,850.00 CONTRACT SERVICES MO 3.27-96 154743 PAGENET $783.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 154744 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS $789.98 REIMB.PETTY CASH 154745 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $128,416.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-29-95 154746 THE PLANNING REPORT $199.00 SUBSCRIPTION 154747 U.S.FILTER AND/OR $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 154748 POLYPURE,INC. $21,906.98 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 �y 154749 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 564.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES K 154750 PROMINENT FLUID CONTROL,INC. $799.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL .si 154751 PUBLIC CONTRACTING IN CALIF. $395.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING p1 154752 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $2,071.10 FENCING INSTALLATION '+ 164753 OUICKSTART TECHNOLOGIES $1,350.00 CONSULTING SERVICES i3 154754 R&R INSTRUMENTS $397.98 ELECTRIC PARTS > 154755 REAL TIME SYSTEMS CDR $3.360.50 INTEGRATION SERVICES in 154756 BOLT DELIVERY $252.40 FREIGHT 154767 REMEDYTEMP $1.574.52 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 154758 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $2.150.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 154759 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $1,439.77 PUMP PARTS 154760 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. 575,495.01 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 154761 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $357.92 SPECIALTYGASES 154762 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. 9217.00 LAB REPAIRS 154763 SERPEN7IX CONVEYOR CORP $3,270.87 MECHANICAL PARTS 154764 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $481.69 TOOLS 154765 SHASTA ELECTRIC $34.148.00 CONSTRUCTION J-31-2 164766 SHURELUCK SALES $5.108.80 TOOLS/HARDWARE 154767 SOCOASTAIROUALTTY $27,500.50 PERMIT FEES 154768 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 LAB SUPPUES 154769 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $22.820.63 NATURAL GAS 154770 SO.CALIFORNIA MARINE INST. $880.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 154771 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $11,001.46 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 164772 SUMMIT STEEL $243.72 METAL 154773 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $721.93 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 164774 SVERDRUP CIVIL,INC. $789,385.51 CONSTRUCTION P2-3S3,PI.38.5,P246,P2-65 164775 SWRCB/AFRS $10.000.00 WASTE DISCHARGE FEES 154776 SYMCAS $6.177.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 154777 TCH ASSOCIATES $964.58 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 0927/96 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/02M POSTING DATE 1DAMISS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154778 TRW SPACE&ELECTRONICS GROUP S37200 THERMOMETERS 154779 TEKMAR-DOHRMANN $37.61 LAB SUPPLIES 154780 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $4.848.78 VEHICLE RENTAL-SUMMER PROGRAM 154781 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,239.53 MECHANICAL PARTS 154782 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS $36.70 CABLE SERVICES 164703 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $244.35 LOCKS&KEYS 154784 EDWARD M.TORRES $250.00 EXPENSE REIMS. 154785 TRANSCAT $2,074.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS 154786 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3.722.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5.11-94 154767 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $25.81 TRUCK PARTS 154788 TRUESDAIL LABS $3,078.98 LAB SERVICES 154789 USC-TRG $295.00 REGISTRATION 154790 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $157.00 LAB SUPPLIES 154791 UNISOURCEWOR BUTLER PAPER $1,270.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154792 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $761.91 PARCEL SERVICES 154793 VWR SCIENTIFIC 52,50D.23 LAB SUPPLIES 154794 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $532.44 PLUMBING SUPPLIES to 154795 VARIAN CHROMATOGRAPHY SYS $315.66 LAB SUPPLIES y 154726 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1,657.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 154797 VISION ENVIRO SERVICES INC $3,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE J-11-1-A 154798 WATERS CORPORATION $69.23 SERVICE AGREEMENT y 154799 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $17.982.43 CAUSTIC S0DA MO 8-23-95 154800 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $0.621.23 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE M0424196 > 154801 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 5886.09 MURIATIC ACID a 154802 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $2,738.79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 154803 NANCY WHEATLEY $1,236.03 EXPENSE REIMB. 154804 WOODRUFF,SPRADUN S SMART $83.542.76 LEGAL SERVICES NO 7-M95 154805 WOODWARD GOVERNOR CO $4.999.77 FIELD INVESTIGATION J-33-1 154806 WORDPERFECT $27.97 SUBSCRIPTION 154807 WYATT DATA SERVICES $770.00 PUBLICATION 164808 XEROX CORP. $12.802.69 COPIER LEASES 154809 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. S1SSA0 LAB SUPPLIES 154810 ZENON ENVIRONMENTAL INC $9,000.00 DEMONSTRATION EQUIPMENT 154811 ZYMARK CORP. $80.43 LAB EQUIPMENT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10102M 54,121,604.65 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE OW7196 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1W02MG POSTING DATE 10/02/96 - SUMMARY AMOUNT 91 OPER FUND $105.00 #2 OPER FUND $2.343.81 #2 CAP FAC FUND $8,804.28 #3 OPER FUND $16,378.87 #3 CAP PAC FUND $11,220.02 #5 OPER FUND $1,163.12 #6 OPER FUND $45.00 #7 OPER FUND $5.365.76 #7 CAP FAC FUND $226.684.17 #11 OPER FUND $2,434.22 #14 OPER FUND $82.01 #588 OPER FUND $111.48 #588 CAP FAC FUND $844.00 9887 OPER FUND $213.74 #7814 OPER FUND $15.78 cn JT OPER FUND $783,414.37 x CORP $2.303,031.20 S SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $103.717.29 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $655,530.53 $4.121,504.65 a FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/16/96 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1O116M POSTING DATE 10116196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154867 ARK TECHNOLOGIES $3.000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154868 AT&T-MEGACOMSERVICE $2.521.27 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154869 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $17.86 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 154870 AWSI $235.04 MEDICAL TESTING 154871 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOLING&EQUIP. $267.31 HARDWARE 154072 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $998.51 DOOR REPAIRS 154973 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $981.82 SPECIALTY GASSES 154874 ALADDIN HOUSE $925.80 WINDOW BLINDS 154875 ALCO PRODUCTS INC $181.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154876 AMER SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGR $55.00 PUBLICATION 154877 AMERIDATA $9.050.24 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 154878 AMERICAN SIGMA $509.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 154879 AMSCO SCIENTIFIC $226.14 LAB SUPPLIES 154880 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $103.40 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 154881 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $215.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154882 AQUATIC BIASSAY B CONSULT $235.00 LAB SERVICES 154893 NICHOLAS ARHONTES 5265.91 EXPENSE REIMB, 154884 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $9,278.72 WASTE REMOVAL x 154885 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. S3B0.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL m 154886 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $290.93 BUILDING MATERIALS 154887 AMSA $825.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 154889 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $4,080.18 PAYROLL SERVICES ^3 154889 AWARDS B TROPHIES $30.17 PLAQUES y 154890 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $416.66 ROPE 154891 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS $47.40 WASTE DISPOSAL 154892 E S BABCOCK&SONS INC $270.00 LAB ANALYSIS 154893 SARNEBY-SUTCUFFE CORP. $16,511.11 FILTER MEDIA 154894 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,801.40 BATTERIES 154895 BEACH PAVING INC. $950.00 PAVING SERVICES 154896 BEACON SAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $34.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 154897 WT WLLARD $319.71 BUILDING REPAIRS 154898 BOOT BARN $182.98 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 154899 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $7,100.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES 154900 BRANDALL MODULAR CORP $61.450.00 INFO TECH TRAILER M04-24-90 154901 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $241.50 INSTRUMENT 154902 STEVE SURRILL $150.10 EXPENSE REIMB. 154903 BUSINESS ENTER.TRAINING SOLUTIONS $5.195.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154904 CEM CORPORATION $387.96 LAB SUPPLIES 154905 MICROBAC LABORATORIES,INC. $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS 154906 C.P.I. $1,567.22 LAB SUPPLIES 154907 CS COMPANY $2.251.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 164908 CALTROL,INC. $648.38 HARDWARE 154909 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $178.08 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154910 CAUF RELOCATION SERVICES $519.50 MOVING SERVICES 154911 CARDILLO ENGINEERS $149,801.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES MO 3-27-96,5.24-95,4-14-93 154912 DECK CARRK* 5210.99 EXPENSE REIMB. FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/16/96 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/16195 POSTING DATE 10116/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154913 CATAPULTING. $2,720.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 164914 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $3,7T7.68 OFFICE FURNITURE 154915 CERFNET $20.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 154916 GEORGE CHARETTE $190.95 EXPENSE REIMB. 154917 CHEMWEST INC $8.022.51 PUMP PARTS 154918 CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANTS E189.96 TRAINING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 154919 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $11.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154920 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO. $24.52 LAB SUPPLIES 154921 COUCH 8 SONS $11,090.00 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 164922 COMMUNICATIONS PERFORMANCE GROUP $31.205.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MO I0-25415 154923 COMPUSERVE $31005 COMPUTER SERVICES 154924 CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS $106.80 DOCUMENT DISPOSAL SERVICE 154925 CONNELL GM PARTS 1 DIV. $26.59 TRUCK PARTS 154926 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3,713.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 154927 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $2,783.51 PRINTING SERVICES 154928 CONSUMER PIPE $151.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 154929 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $19,851.15 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.6.11-93 154930 COOPER CAMERON CORP. $5,733.12 ENGINE PARTS M 154931 COPELCO CAPITAL C/O IMAGE PLUS $1.432.00 COPIER LEASE DC 154932 CORPORATE EXPRESS $779.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES m 164933 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $225.42 TRUCK PARTS m 154934 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,855.24 ELECTRIC PARTS H 154936 CHARLES STATP. NIV FUL E TO $59.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS 'j 154936 CAL STATE UNIV FULLERTON E7,185.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING Ip 154937 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $266.32 UNDERGROUND PETROLEUM STORAGE FEE 154938 J.W.IYANGELO CO,INC. $609.33 VALVES 154939 JAMES DARLINGTON $412.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154940 ALBERT W DAVIES INC $100,673.81 CONSTRUCTION 3-36R 154941 DE GUELLE B SONS GLASS CO $255.72 SAFETY GLASS 154942 DELL MARKETING L.P. $20,192.52 DESKTOP COMPUTERS 154943 DEL MAR ANALYTICAL $760.00 BIOSOUDS ANALYSIS 1549" DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $14.496.69 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN MO.1.12-94 154945 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $1,549.23 VALVES 154946 CARLA DILLON $216.39 EXPENSE REIMS. 154947 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 154948 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $192.23 PAINT SUPPLIES 154949 ESP NORTH $212.73 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 154950 J.D.EDWARDS $31,388.00 SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES MO 7-24-96 154951 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $170.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 154952 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $8,140.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 154953 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,200.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.5-24-95 154954 DARRELL ENNIS $163.75 EXPENSE REIMB. 154955 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $1,872.OD LABSERVICES 154956 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS DEVELOP $3,000.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 154957 FASION FAIR CLEANERS $"De PERMIT CANCELLATION REFUND 154958 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $315.15 AIR FREIGHT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 10116M6 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10116NO POSTING DATE 10118196 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 154959 FIRST CHOICE $354.98 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 154960 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $2.052.63 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 154961 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $996.24 LAB SUPPLIES 164962 TIM FOLEY $204.51 EXPENSE REIMS. 154983 FORNACIARI CO $138.59 FILTERS 154964 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $136.81 PHOTO SUPPLIES 154966 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,357.03 PAINT SUPPLIES 154966 FRYS ELECTRONICS $921.67 ELECTRONIC B COMPUTER SUPPLIES 154957 CITY OF FULLERTON $298.39 WATER USE 154968 FURON CO. $426.39 CABLE 154969 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1.490.10 CHEMICALS 154970 THE GARTNER GROUP $425.61 SUBSCRIPTION 154971 GATEWAY MEDICAL CENTER $315.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 154972 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,123.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES 154973 THE GRAMMAR GROUP $1.500.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 154974 GRASSYS.T.I. $2,314.11 ENGINE PARTS 154975 GRAYBAR $1,941.07 TOOLS 154976 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING 3891.53 PRINTING m 154977 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $4,4112.07 PRINTING >4 154978 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,328.35 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 5 �+ 154979 HAULAWAV CONTAINERS E2,010.00 CONTAINER RENTALS btl 154980 PL HAWN CO,INC. $1,082.56 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES y 154981 MICHELLE HETHERINGTON $244.60 EXPENSE REIMS. 154982 HOME DEPOT $26.78 SMALL HARDWARE CO 154983 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.132.07 PAINT SUPPLIES w 154984 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH E71,778.86 WATER USE IM985 HYDROTEX INC $1.532.16 AUTO SUPPLIES 154986 IPCO SAFETY $4,047.70 SAFETYSUPPLIES 154987 ISCO,INC. $4,633.25 INSTRUMENT 164988 INFORMATION RESOURCES $375.00 PERSONNEL SERVICES 154989 INSTITUTE B LAW $2.575.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 154990 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $747.14 BATTERIES 154991 IRMNE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 154992 JAMISON ENGINEERING $1.783.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 154993 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY $351.18 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 154994 JAYS CATERING $979.93 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 154995 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $666.35 ELECTRIC PARTS 154996 MARKKAWAMOTO $229.35 EXPENSE REIMS. 154997 KEMIRON PACIFIC,INC. $103,913.40 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO 9.27-95 154998 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP $1,426.80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES M.O.11-15-95 154999 KING BEARING,INC. $531.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES 155000 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $438.24 TOOLS 155001 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $1,135.22 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE 155002 LACABA $185.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING REGISTRATION 155003 TAIDLAW ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $6.058.03 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL DISPOSAL 155004 LAWICRANDAL,INC. $278.37 SOIL TESTING 7-13.94 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10116MS PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10N6MG POSTING DATE 10/16/96 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 155005 LEARNING TREE INTERNATIONAL $2.990.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 155006 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. $12.334.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES 155007 LEWCO ELECTRIC $284.70 TRUCK PARTS 155008 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $1,686.38 ENVIR.CONSULTING SERVICES MO 12.9-90 155009 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO,INC. $387.90 UNIFORMS 155010 MPS $185.83 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 155011 MACOMCO $2,015.94 SERVICE AGREEMENT 155012 MSA $80.23 SENSOR BOARD REPAIR 156013 MARVAC DOW ELECTRONICS $175.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155014 MIKE MASTERSON $229.75 EXPENSE REIMB. 155015 MIKE MCCARTHY $204.51 EXPENSE REIMB. 155016 DONALD F.MCINTYRE $744.66 EXPENSE REIMB. 155017 MCJUNKIN CORP 53,286.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155018 MESA MUFFLER $335.45 AUTO PARTS 155019 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,954.34 UNIFORM RENTALS 155020 MORELAND&ASSOCIATES $4.262.00 AUDITING SERVICES M03."S 155021 MORTON SALT $868.52 SALT 155022 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $3,222.65 MEMBERSHIP P1 155023 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $703.71 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 155024 NICKEY PETROLEUM COMPANY $742.71 LUBRICANTS/DIESEL FUEL .x. 155025 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $2.779.10 FILTERS m 165026 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $155.05 SAFETY GLASSES "^ 155027 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION 1,029.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 155028 OFFICE PAVILIONSBNTERIOR RESOURCES $111.53 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS m 155029 ORANGE COUNTY WATER ASSOC. $240.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 1 155030 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $143.89 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 0 155031 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $554.33 FITTINGS 155032 ORTIZ FIRE PROTECTION $735.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 155033 OXYGEN SERVICE $1.869.78 SPECIALTYGASES 155034 COUNTY OF ORANGE $870.00 ROLL CHANGE PROCESSING FEE 155035 COUNTY OF ORANGE $101.00 PERMITS 155036 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $821.22 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155037 PACIFIC PARTS $10,985.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS 155038 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $99.60 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155039 PACIFIC BELL $16.58 TELEPHONE SERVICES 155040 PANENERGY TRADING&MARKET $86.172.09 NATURAL GAS 155041 PARKHOUSE TIRE,INC. $332.95 TIRES 155042 PARTS UNLIMITED $409.94 TRUCK PARTS 155043 PEOPLE SOFT,INC. $33,550.00 BID BOND REFUND 155W4 PERMA SEAL $2,955AS LURE OIL 155045 PERSONAL STRENGTHS PURL 5410.98 TRAINING MATERIALS 155046 ELAN PHARMA $210.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 155047 POLYPURE,INC. $27,942.56 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 155048 POLYSPEDE $201.45 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 155049 POSTTIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $523.55 CHEMICALS 155050 PRENTICE HALL $49.82 PUBLICATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 1011W196 PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10116M POSTING DATE 10/161% WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 155051 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $192.00 ICE FOR SAMPLES 155052 PUMPING SOLUTIONS INC $173.74 PUMP PARTS 155053 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $287.05 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 155054 R S I TRAINING,INC $900.00 TRAINING MATERIALS 155055 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $2.002.72 TRASH REMOVAL 155050 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $215.47 LAB SUPPLIES 155057 RANCHO AUTO WASH INC $427.50 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 155058 BOLT DELIVERY $158.65 FREIGHT 155059 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST $279.63 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155060 THE REGISTER $1,736.80 NOTICES BADS 155061 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $40D.00 OCEAN MONITORING 155062 REMEDYTEMP $21,018.10 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 155063 RUPES-KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $1.051.21 PUMP PARTS 155064 SKC WEST $874.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES 155055 ST.SENA CONVALESCENT CENTER $639.60 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 155066 SCHERING-PLOUGH $64.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES 155067 SCHWING AMERICA,INC. $3,998.10 PUMP PARTS 155068 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $148.10 WATER USE to 155089 STUART SEVERN $183.18 EXPENSE REIMB. x 155070 SHURELUCK SALES $5.309.30 TOOLSIHARDWARE m 155071 MIKE SILBERMANN COMPANY $3,015.93 SEWER REPAIRS 155072 MELINDA SILVERMAN,PHO $125.00 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING SERVICES , 155073 SKILL PATH SEMINARS 5464.00 TECHNICAL TRAINING 155074 SMITH-EMERYCO. $2,624.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13.94 m 155075 SMITH PIPE B SUPPLY $169.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155078 SOUTH COAST WATER $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES U 155077 SO CALIF EDISON CO $7.227.36 POWER 155078 80.CAL.GAS.CO. $2,750.13 NATURAL GAS 155079 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $11.669.88 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 155080 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO..INC. $250.00 METER 155081 STANDARD SUMP B EOUIPCO $136.16 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155082 STERLING ART $246.31 ART SUPPLIES 155D03 SUMMIT STEEL $1.008.54 METAL 155084 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $538.75 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 155085 SWRCS/AFRS $400.00 ANNUAL WASTE DISCHARGE FEE 155086 TARBYOF DELAWARE INC $1.243.00 PUMP PARTS 155087 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $333.97 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 155088 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $61.26 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 155089 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,296.75 MECHANICAL PARTS 155090 TIME MOTION TOOLS $125.21 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155091 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $1,000.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 155092 MARKTOMKO $269.19 EXPENSE REIMB. 155093 TRUESDAIL LABS $500.00 LAB SERVICES 155094 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $925.21 INSTRUMENT PARTS 155095 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $31.89 PARCEL SERVICES 155M VWR SCIENTIFIC $5,980.52 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IWISMS PAGES REPORT NUMBER AP43 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1011696 POSTING DATE 101ISM WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 155097 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3.907.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 155098 VALVATE ASSOCIATES $1.762.87 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155099 TED VITKO $216.39 EXPENSE REIMB, 155100 WACKENHUTCORP. $13.392.62 CONTRACT SERVICE-SECURITY GUARDS 155101 GUY L WARDEN B SONS $165.22 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155102 K.H.WATTS CO $90.48 FILTERS 155103 WESTERN FEDERAL INC $679.32 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 155104 WESTERN METRO UNIT $523.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155105 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $15.127.11 CAUSTIC SODA MO8-23.95 155105 WESTERN TAP MANUFACTURING $163.34 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 155107 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $875.69 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 155108 WESCO $1,093.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 155109 JUDITH A.WILSON $79.44 CELLULAR PHONE REIMB. 155110 JAMES WYBENGA $196.95 EXPENSE REIMB.. 155111 XEROX CORP. $120.50 COPIER LEASES 155112 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $230.30 LAB SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/18816 $7,071,487.37 M >4 S M W H � SUMMARY AMOUNT m #10PER FUND $386.70 fit OPER FUND $1.402.99 fi3 OPER FUND $9,125.26 93 CAP FAC FUND $128,355.52 95 OPER FUND $221.23 06 OPER FUND $163.80 fi7 OPER FUND $3,580.85 fill OPER FUND $7,394.31 911 CAP FAC FUND $11.101.97 013 OPER FUND $39.30 JT OPER FUND $431.629.89 CORF $298,210.03 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND $14,496.69 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $165,398.83 $1,071,487.37 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE -VARIOUS PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID-MISCELLANEOUS HANDWRITE WARRANTS WARRANT DATE WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 10110FJ8 154866 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $1,032.36 PETTY CASH REIMB. 10110/96 155113 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN&SMART $45,000.00 LEGAL SERVICES 1028MB 155396 ANDY C.PATTERSON,ADMNSTR OF $10,000.00 REPLACEMENT WARRANT 1029/98 155397 THE BALBOA BAY CLUB $3,629.70 NEWPORT SPILL-ANDERSON 1029N8 155398 CWEA $650.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 102956 155399 LORI COLAMONICO $631.00 DEDUCTION WARRANT REPLACEMENT 1029M 155400 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN B SMART $28.814.21 LEGAL SERVICES 1051I98 155401 AMSA $275.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 10131AJ6 155402 EDWARD M.TORRES $250.00 CASH ADVANCE 11/07AJ6 155637 INGRID HELLEBRAND $151.58 EXPENSE REIMB. 11/07/98 155638 CTY SAN.DIST.OF ORANGE CTY $963.56 PETTY CASH REIMB. 11/07/96 155639 WOODRUFF,SPRADLIN&SMART $104,959.11 LEGAL SERVICES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID E796.258.52 l'1 SUMMARY AMOUNT x m JT OPER FUND $179,773.72 $10.0 � SELF4R1NDE0INSURANCE FUND E70.000.00 y JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $6,482.80 $19 2256.52 _V STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda ,for ,t`he,Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on /G Ww a0 199pwas duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on�UlUfirn //Lv LS,, 19-60 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this��day of Penny Kyle ecret of each of the Boards of ctork9f County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California BSFwmsIF21R